Mark J. Reed skribis 2006-08-31 9:45 (-0400):
> According to S05, the string method equivalent of the s/// operator is named
> "subst". (Just going by the spec here; the method doesn't exist yet in
> Pugs). I anticipate typos galore from the near-collision of names between
> "subst" and "substr"; perhaps "replace" would be a better name, even though
> it breaks the mnemonic association with s///?