Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224:1119]

This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by Manc Skipper

Those suicides might be alive if that gun they used wasn't there. They all count in the death toll. If you get a suicidal impulse with a gun handy, you're gone before you can change your mind.
Gun lovers wade through the blood of innocent victims, braying of thier gun-love.

I don't care. you want to ban guns in a country you aren't even a citizen of. people like you pretend its about saving victims when its all about punishing lawful gun owners.

Originally Posted by EarlzP

Why would you not want to register your weapon?

Originally Posted by Celebrity

, as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by Threegoofs

Obsessed? It's a large developed area with almost no gun violence? Why wouldn't a rational person look there for possible solutions?

why don't you come out and say you want European style gun bans in the USA even though there is no evidence they would work here. but what they will do is harass lawful gun owners which many of us suspect is the real goal of so many gun restrictionists who shed crocodile tears over dead victims

Originally Posted by EarlzP

Why would you not want to register your weapon?

Originally Posted by Celebrity

, as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by TurtleDude

why don't you come out and say you want European style gun bans in the USA even though there is no evidence they would work here. but what they will do is harass lawful gun owners which many of us suspect is the real goal of so many gun restrictionists who shed crocodile tears over dead victims

Such a victim.

I never said I want European style gun bans. But I guess you must have noticed that they are working very well over there, huh?

Many Trump supporters have lots of problems, and those deplorables are bringing those problems to us. They’re racists. They’re misogynists. They’re islamophobic. They're xenophobes and homophobes. And some, I assume, are good people.

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by Kobie

While I have no interest in banning guns, it's a pretty weak argument that those who do hold the sole goal of inconveniencing you, rather than actually hoping to reduce the body count.

well it has been proven. The Hughes amendment was nothing about crime control but spite. and since its illegal for any felon to have any gun, stuff like "assault weapon bans" are clearly designed to harass lawful gun owners. same with Magazine bans or waiting periods

now some politicians push these bans to pander to the low IQ or low information Sheeple and don't really care about other matters. But there is no doubt that politicians like Feinstein, Biden, and Schemer-Its about trying to hurt the NRA

once again, the Hughes Amendment proved my argument-and it cannot be rebutted

Originally Posted by EarlzP

Why would you not want to register your weapon?

Originally Posted by Celebrity

, as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by TurtleDude

well it has been proven. The Hughes amendment was nothing about crime control but spite. and since its illegal for any felon to have any gun, stuff like "assault weapon bans" are clearly designed to harass lawful gun owners. same with Magazine bans or waiting periods

now some politicians push these bans to pander to the low IQ or low information Sheeple and don't really care about other matters. But there is no doubt that politicians like Feinstein, Biden, and Schemer-Its about trying to hurt the NRA

once again, the Hughes Amendment proved my argument-and it cannot be rebutted

Ronald Reagan was a real gun banning nut, huh?

And while the megalomaniacal angle suits you well, I'm pretty sure it hasn't been 'proven' that the entire point of Hughes was to inconvenience you and you gun buddies.

Many Trump supporters have lots of problems, and those deplorables are bringing those problems to us. They’re racists. They’re misogynists. They’re islamophobic. They're xenophobes and homophobes. And some, I assume, are good people.

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by Manc Skipper

Those suicides might be alive if that gun they used wasn't there. They all count in the death toll. If you get a suicidal impulse with a gun handy, you're gone before you can change your mind.
Gun lovers wade through the blood of innocent victims, braying of thier gun-love.

If the Daily Mail is to be believed, Brits are extremely creative in the ways they commit suicide. In the absence of guns, those intent on killing themselves do seem to find a way--throwing themselves off roofs and etc.

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by TurtleDude

well it has been proven. The Hughes amendment was nothing about crime control but spite. and since its illegal for any felon to have any gun, stuff like "assault weapon bans" are clearly designed to harass lawful gun owners. same with Magazine bans or waiting periods

now some politicians push these bans to pander to the low IQ or low information Sheeple and don't really care about other matters. But there is no doubt that politicians like Feinstein, Biden, and Schemer-Its about trying to hurt the NRA

once again, the Hughes Amendment proved my argument-and it cannot be rebutted

Re: Police: Multiple Victims in South Carolina church shooting [W:224]

Originally Posted by nota bene

If the Daily Mail is to be believed, Brits are extremely creative in the ways they commit suicide. In the absence of guns, those intent on killing themselves do seem to find a way--throwing themselves off roofs and etc.

Eh, the Daily Mail will run the more sensational stuff, but anecdotes aren't data.