If I Remain Silent, You May Lodge Complaint In The Hereafter That I Have Not Briefed You The Truth. So, I Must write. I Must speak. Almighty Allah Commands : " And when you speak, Speak Just, Even Though It Be A Matter Of Your Relative, And Fulfill The Covenant Of Allah." [ Al Quran - Surah Al Anaam - Verse No 152 ] NB: To see the list of Aticles, please click on "বাংলা নিবন্ধ-সমুহের তালিকা" & "List Of English Articles" Pages.

Tuesday, 8 July 2014

AUTHOR : MAULANA MUHAMMAD A K AZAD [ ABU ARIF AL ALAWI]

In a reply to a Christian's
question about Jesus Christ's being Son of Allah, Brother Zakir Naik says
thatone who
obeys Allah is His son, not by birth but by obedience. Naik calls himself,
too, Allah's son as he obeys Him. Thus all who obey Allah are, according
to Naik, His sons. Dr Zakir says : " Adam, Israel,Isaac have been referred as Allah's son in Bible but son is not referred to as begotten son...... in Bible it is written whoever obeys Allah's words is Allah's son, If you obey Allah's word, according to Bible, you are also Allah's son. If I obey Allah's word, I am also Allah's son, but in the Biblical way, not in the begotten way" Link is : www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnHjMCSbFxU

Dear Readers
! Can you imagine? He always demands proof of Al Quran and
Sahih Hadith . But he himself provides Only logic, logic and logic !
Only strange logic he provides in support of his own beliefs. He provides
No Verse of Al Quran and no Hadith!

A Pro-Zakir Naik Institution, Central
Mosque.com tried to defend zakir Naik on this issue saying : "There
is no problem with is statement. It is obvious that Zakir Naik does not mean
that they are biological sons of Allah Ta'ala, especially since himself says
it. This is similar to how an authentic Hadith calls those who learn the Quran
and practice upon it the family of Allah Ta'ala. (Ibn Majah, 1/78) Another
Hadith states that all people are the family if Allah. (Al-Mujam al-Kabir,
10/86) "Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:29 AM . When I asked them ,"can one
call himself Allah's brother? Can a woman callherself Allah's wife? Can one call
Allah Subhanahu Taala his /herfather? Can one call himself Allah's
nephew ? What is Islam's ruling?"(Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:19 PM ), they maintained dead
silence. If this standpoint is accepted, one may call allah Subhanahu
Taala his brother because , as per Islam, each and every Mu'min is brother of
one another and Allah's one name is Mumin, therefore would Zakiris call
Him borther also ? Astagfirullah.

Even I approached Brother Naik
himself and his IRF on this issue. When in response of my 16 questions to Zakir Naik,
IRF briefed me that they "do not entertain queries on matters pertainingto Fiqh and Masaail, since our
speciality is propagating Islam tonon-Muslims i.e. matters pertaining
to Islam and Comparativereligion", I asked them :" In every
issue against Ahle Sunnat Wa zamaat, you demand evidencesfrom Quran
and Sahih Hadith but you yourself present all your cases onlywith the
help of logic and reason.' If' is your main weapon and with theword-game
you try to befool the audiences who is in the darkness ofIslamic
theology.In a reply to a Christian's question you say, one who obeys
Allah isHis son, not by birth but by obedience. Naik calls himself
Allah's sonas he obeys Him. What is it? How can you dare to utter
such dangerouswords? Which verse of Al quran or which Hadith can you preesnt asevidence in support of your strange views? This is not the only case .In countless cases, you have uttered poisonous views, harmful for youown
as well as the listners' Imaan." (Sent on Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:43 PM ). But
Zakir Naik and his IRF maintained dead silence.

Brothers &
Sisters! Dr.
Naik’s belief that he is the son of Allah is
actually belief of the Jews and The Christians. This belief is absolutely
against Islam.The Jews and The Christians too used to call themselves “ Allah’s
sons” and Allah refuted them harshly.
Almighty Allah says in Holy Quran Surah Al Maidah, Verse No. 18 says:

18. And the Jews and Christians said We are sons of Allah and His
dear ones'. Say you; 'why then does He torment you for your sins'? But you
are human beings of His creations. He forgives whom He pleases. And to Allah
belongs the Kingdom of heavens and earth and all that is between them. And
towards Him is the return.

Dear Readers ! We urge Brother Zakir not to comment on sensitive issues,
specially about Allah Subhanahu Taala. Loose talk on such issues may
lead to the destruction of Imaan. We are slaves of Allah. we are Gulam of
Allah. We are worshippers of Allah. Allah is our Absolute Malik. How can we
engaze in such nasty talks ? May Allah guide us along Siratwal Mustaqeem.

AUTHOR : MAULANA MUHAMMAD A K AZAD [ ABU ARIF AL ALAWI]

Dr. Zakir Naik says: " ......what
is the meaning of the word Hindu…….the word Hindu is a geographical
definition…..itmeans those people who live in the land of Indus valley
civilization….those who live in India…I live in India. by definition I am a
Hindu…..swami Vivekananda said Hindu is a geographical definition…swamin
vivekanda says it's a misnoma…..the correct word should be vedantist….because
Hindus follow the Vedas….vedantist should be the right word….Hindu is a misnoma….but if you say Hindu is a person who
does idol worship then am not a Hindu…"(Symposium- religion in the right
perspective------"Presenting Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions –Lecture
series by Dr. Zaakir Naik,Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening
Sessions

Respected Brothers &
Sisters! It is fard on Muslims to maintain the
distinction from kuffar and Mushrikin. Mr Naik's geographical
definition of Hindu is partly true. In the remote past, one might
have indicated the people of Indus Valley as Hindu.. But Today, Hindu is
rigorously religious identity, not geographical identity. His quoted
authority Swami Vivekananda himself in countless places referred Hinduism
as a religion. Vivekananda says: " The Hindu can worship any sage and
any Saint from any country whatsoever....." Swamiji clearly
distinguishes the Hindu Religion from the muslims in this words:
"When the Mohammedans first came, we are said-I think, on the authority of
Ferishta............to have been six hundred milliond of Hindus. And then every
man going out of the Hindu pale is not only a man less, but an enemy the
more." ( Teachings of Swami Vivekananda, published by Advaita
Ashrama, Page 113). Zains live in India. If geographical definition
of Hindu is accepted, Zains too should be called Hindus. But The Supreme Court
of India In the 2006 verdict, found that the "Jain Religion is
indisputably not a part of the Hindu Religion( para 25, Committee of Management
Kanya Junior High School Bal Vidya Mandir, Etah, Uttar Pradesh v. Sachiv, U.P.
Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. and Ors., Per Dalveer Bhandari J.,
Civil Appeal No. 9595 of 2003, decided On: 21.08.2006, Supreme Court of India).
In 1995, while considering the question "who are Hindus and what are the
broad features of Hindu religion", The Supreme Court of India highlightes
Bal Gangadhar Tilak's formulation of Hinduism's defining features:

Secondly, Persian dictionary titled
Lughet-e-Kishwari, published in Lucknow in 1964, gives the meaning of Hindu as
‘chore (thief), dakoo (dacoit), raahzan (waylayer), and ghulam (slave). If
Zakir Naik insists on being called Hindu by definition, one may take him to be
a chore or thief and I am sure Brother Naik would not love to be called
chore or thief.

Thirdly, modern research dismisses the
theory of Hindu being the corrupt version of Sindhu. Dr Baldev Singh writes:
"The interpretation that the word Hindu is a corrupted version of Sindhu
does not explain why the Sindhu River or the people who live in the valley of
this river did not acquire the name “Hindu.” This river is called Sindh and the
people are called Punjabis and Sindhis. No body calls the state of Sindh as
Hind or Sindhis as Hindis.........this word Hindu is a corrupt form of
Sindhu but this is wrong because Sindhu was the name of the river and not the
name of the community." Dr Singh further wrires:

" The word Hindu may be as old as the Indus Vallay Civilization. To
find the meaning of “Hindu” one ought to look at the term “Hindu
Kush”(killer of Hindus). Who were the people, who named this
mountain range as Hindu Kush? Why these mountains were called the
killers of Hindus? As I mentioned earlier, the Indian subcontinent
was inhabited by dark complexioned people before the migration of
Caucasian tribes from the Caucasus region. The fair skinned
Caucasian tribes who lived on the Northwest of Hindu Kush Moutain
range called the Indian subcontinent as the land of Hindus (land of
black people). The Northwest expansion of the inhabitants of Indus
Valley was prevented by of Hindu Kush Mountains. Whenever the plain
dwelling Indians (Hindus) attempted to cross these mountains, they
met death due harsh terrain and heavy snow. That is how these
mountains were given the name Hindu Kush by mountain dwelling
Caucasian tribes. Once a large number of Indian people died on these
mountains due to heavy snow fall and that is how these mountains
acquired the name “Hindu Kush” – killer of the Hindus. [Bhai Kahan
Singh Nabha, Mahan Kosh, 1996 edn. p 275.]
Source : tritiopokhkho.wordpress.com/.../a-note-on-history-meaning-of-wor

Most Importantly,
Brother Zakir has made a distressing blunder by saying that he is a Hindu by
geographical definition. Islam is a deen, the complete code of life. A Muslim
cannot be a Hindu, Christian or Jew simultaneously whatever may be the meaning
of these words. Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa sallam warned :"Whoever
says that he is on Deen other than Islam then he is as he says." (Bukhari,
good manners and form, vol 8, hadith 073). Even Zakir Naik's own Salafi mentors
rebuke him thus: "And you degrade yourself to the position of those losers
claiming that you are a Jew and you are a Christian, it is authentically proved
by Ibn Umar رضى
الله عنه that Rasoolullah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said:
"Whosoever imitates with any nation then (indeed) the one is from amongst
them." [REF: Saiykh Yaheeya Al
Hazoorie under question no 25 & 26.]

Author : Maulana Muhammad A K Azad [ Abu Arif Al Alawi]

Pseudo-Reformer Zakir Naik’s horrible blunder
is that he makes his own tafsir of Al Quran like his mentor Abul Ala
Maududi. This is open declaration of war against Sharia Rules.
Maududi writes in favour of making own tafsir of Quran : ''The teachings
of Qur'an and Sunnat-e-Rasool are a must for all but not from the old
collection of Tafseer and Ahadith.'' (Tanqihaat, Page
114). Now let us see how Maududi's flag-bearer Mr Naik dares to cross all
limitations.

Dr Naik was
asked : " Assalamu Alaikum My name is Saba. I am a student.
My question to brother Zakir is that according to the Qur’an when a
man enters paradise, he will get hoor, i.e. beautiful maidens. What will a
woman have when she enters paradise? "

Brother Naik replied : " The word hoor occurs in the Qur’an in no less than
four different places: In Surah Dukhan chapter 44, verse 54 , In Surah Al-Tur
chapter 52 verse 20 , In Surah Rahman chapter 55 verse 72 , In Surah Al-Waqiah
chapter 56 verse 22 . Many translators of the Qur’an have translated the
word hoor as ‘beautiful maidens’ especially in the Urdu translations. If hoor
means ‘beautiful maidens’ or girls, then they are meant only for the men.
Hence, what will the women get if they enter Paradise? The word hoor is
actually the plural of ahwar (applicable to man) and of haura (applicable to
woman) and signifies a person having eyes characterized by hauar a special
quality bestowed upon a good soul, male or female in paradise and it denotes
the intense whiteness of the white part of the spiritual eye. The Qur’an
describes in several other verses , Surah baqara-Verse No 25 and Surah Nisah -
Verse No 57 that in paradise you will have azwaje mutahhara meaning
companion .Mohammad Asad has translated the word hoor as spouse and
Abdullah Yusuf Ali as companion. Therefore, the real meaning of hoor is
companion or partner. A man in paradise will have a hoor that is a
beautiful maiden with beautiful big and lustrous eyes and a woman in paradise
will get a man with beautiful big and lustrous eyes. Hope the answer is
clear."

Dear
Readers ! To mainatin the Hyaaa of women as well as men , I'll not delve deep
into this issue. Just let us Ponder over a basic Point. InshaAllah, it'll be
sufficient to expose Zakir Naik's word-game .

Did
Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam ever say in tafsir of the verses
relating to hoors that women will get male hoor in paradise ? Did Khulfae
Rashidin ever say in tafsir of concerned verses that women will get male
hoor in paradise ? Did any Tabi'i and Tab-Tabain, belonging to the age of
Khairul Quroon, ever say in tafsir of concerned verses that women will get male
hoor in paradise ? Did Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam shafi'i, Imam Maliki and Imam
Hanbal ever make such tafsir? Did any Tafsir-Specialist, from Tabari, Ibne
Kathir, Fakhruddin Razi, Qurtubi and Jalaluddin Syuoti to
Justice Karam Shah Azhari make such tafsir ? Did
any Scholar in the 1400-years history of Islam ever declare in
tafsi of the concerned verse that women will get male hoor? The answer is,
emphatic No. Even Ibne Taimiya and his followers did not dare to make such
tafsir. De facto, there is not the tiniest hint in Al Quran and Hadith
regarding women receiving male hoor in Paradise.

. Dear Readers !What Does Brother
Zakir Naik mean ? Does he mean that that there are gay men in
Jannah? That's what it means when you declare` the
"hoor" mentioned in the Qur'an refers to men when these verses
clearly states that no man or jinn has touched them.

Tafseer of Ibn Katheer on these verses

"(Qasirat At-Tarf) chaste females, wives restraining their glances,
desiring none except their husbands, seeing them as the most beautiful men in
Paradise. This was said by Ibn `Abbas, Qatadah, `Ata' Al-Khurasani and Ibn
Zayd. It was reported that one of these wives will say to her husband, "By
Allah! I neither see anything in Paradise more handsome than you nor more
beloved to me than you. So praise be to Allah Who made you for me and made me
for you.'' Allah said,

[لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ ]

(whom never deflowered a human before nor Jinn
) meaning they are delightful virgins of comparable age who never had sexual
intercourse with anyone, whether from mankind or Jinns, before their husbands.
This is also a proof that the believers among the Jinns will enter Paradise.
Artat bin Al-Mundhir said, "Damrah bin Habib was asked if the Jinns will
enter Paradise and he said, `Yes, and they will get married. The Jinns will
have Jinn women and the humans will have female humans.''' Allah's statement,

(whom never deflowered a human before nor Jinn.
Then which of the blessings of your Lord will you both deny) Then
Allah describes these women for the proposed:

[كَأَنَّهُنَّ الْيَاقُوتُ
وَالْمَرْجَانُ
]

(they are like Yaqut and Marjan.)
Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Ibn Zayd and others said, "They are as pure as rubies
and white as Marjan.'' So here they described Marjan as pearls. Imam Muslim
recorded that Muhammad bin Sirin said, "Some people either boasted or just
wondered who are more in Paradise, men or women. Abu Hurayrah said, `Has not
Abu Al-Qasim (Muhammad ) said,

(Verily, the first group that will enter
Paradise will look like the moon when it is full, and the next batch will be as
radiant as the radiant star in the sky. Each one of them will marry two
wives. The marrow of the bones of their shins will be seen through the
flesh. None will be unmarried in Paradise.)
This Hadith was recorded in the Two Sahihs. Imam Ahmad recorded that Anas said
that the Messenger of Allah said,

(A morning or an evening journey in Allah's
cause is better than the world and whatever is on its surface. And a place in
Paradise as small as that occupied by the whip of one of you, is better than
the world and whatever is on its surface. If one of the women of the people
of Paradise looks directly at the earth, she will fill what is between
Paradise and earth with a good scent and all of it will become delightful.
Verily, the veil over her head is better than this life and all that is on its
surface.) Al-Bukhari also collected a
similar narration. "

It was narrated that Anas
ibn Maalik (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “I heard the Messenger of
Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: ‘Going out and coming
back for the sake of Allaah is better than this world and all that is in it.
And a spot the size of the bow of one of you in Paradise – or a spot the size
of his whip – is better than this world and all that is in it. If a woman from
among the people of Paradise were to look at the people of this earth, she would
light up all that is in between them and fill it with fragrance. The veil on
her head is better than this world and all that is in it.’” (Narrated by
al-Bukhaari, no. 2587

FATWA OF SALAFI SCHOLAR Shaikh Ibn 'Uthaimeen

Allah, the Most Blessed, the
Most High says, regarding the blessings of Paradise:

" ..Therein you shall have (all) that your inner-selves desire, and
therein you shall have (all) for which you ask for. An entertainment from
(Allâh), the Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Surah Fussilat 41:31-32)

And He, the Most High says:

"..And therein all that inner-selves could desire, and all that eyes could
delight in and you will abide therein forever." (Surah Az-Zukhruf 43:71)

And it is well known that marriage is one of the things which the souls desire
most, and so it will be found in Paradise for the people of Paradise, whether
they be men or women. So, Allah, the Most Blessed, the Most High will marry the
woman in Paradise to the man who was her husband in the life of this world, as
He, the Most Blessed, the Most High says:

"Our Lord! And make them enter the 'Adn (Eden) Paradise (everlasting
Gardens) which you have promised them - and to the righteous among their
fathers, their wives, and their offspring! Verily, You are the All Mighty, the
All-Wise." (Surah Ghafir 40:8)

If she did not marry in the life of this world, then Allah, the Most High will
marry her to one who pleases her in Paradise.

[1] Al-Hur Al-'Ain: Beautiful maidens of Paradise

Taken from Fatawa Arkan-ul-Islam
Islamic Verdicts on the Pillars of Islam
Pages 178 - 179, By the Honorable Shaikh Muhammad bin Salih Al-'Uthaimeen

View of Sheikh 'Atiyyah Saqr,
former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious,
Most Merciful.

All thanks and praise are due to
Allah and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.

Dear questioner, we would like to
thank you for your good question and we implore Almighty Allah for His help in
furnishing you with the best answer.

In the very beginning, we would like
to cite Ibn Kathir's comment on the issue of men having Hoor Al-'Een. It
reads: "Almighty Allah tells us that He will provide the residents of
Paradise with beautiful wives who have big and lustrous eyes and 'whom no man
or Jinn before them has touched' and who are 'Like unto rubies and
coral'".

In fact, Paradise is the abode of
the believers in the Hereafter. Allah has prepared for His believing servants,
males and females, in Paradise indescribable bliss that which no eye has seen,
no ear has heard of and that has never ever crossed the minds of people, to the
extent that even the person who has the least blessings in Paradise will think
that he is the most blessed one.

In more than one Qur'anic verse,
Allah, Most High, calls upon His servants to do their utmost in order to be
favored with Paradise. For example, He says, "And vie one with another
for forgiveness from your Lord, and for a Paradise as wide as are the heavens
and the earth, prepared for those who ward off (evil)." (Al 'Imran:
133)

All this indicates that in Paradise
believing men and women will be showered with blessings; there is no room for
discrimination based on gender in Paradise.

Focusing more on this issue, Sheikh
'Atiyyah Saqr, former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, adds:

"Here Allah mentions the Hoor
Al'Een because in most cases men pursue women and not vice versa. As for women,
Allah Almighty may marry them to any of the believers in Paradise, if they did
not get married during worldly life, or He may compensate them by making them
feel content with their position. It is also said that Allah may grant women
some kind of beauty with which they will feel that they are better than the Hoor
Al-'Een and that they are their mistress, so they will not love anyone
other than their own husbands nor will they feel jealous of the Hoor Al-'Een."

Monday, 7 July 2014

Author : Maulana Muhammad A K Azad [ Abu Arif Al Alawi]

Dr. Zakir Naik, The Leader of The
Kharizi Bidatis, says : "Regarding the second part of the
question…that God can do everything?…Normally
I pose this question to most of the people who believe in God just so that they
have better understanding of Allah subhanwatala …I ask them the question.. that
can God create anything and everything …most of them will say Yes,… can God
destroy anything and everything…all will say Yes …my third question is ..can
God create
a thing which he cannot destroy… and they are trapped…if they say yes
.. that God can create a thing which he cannot destroy they are going
against the second statement that God can destroy everything ..if they
say no God cannot create a thing which he cannot destroy that means
they are going against first statement that God can create everything…
again they are not using logic… they are trapped …same way God cannot
create a tall short man ..yes he can make a tall man short but no
longer he remains tall….he can make a tall man short……no longer
remains tall..he make a short man tall ..no longer that man remains
short….but you cant have a tall short man ..you cannot ….(word
unclear)…who is ..neither tall neither short ..but God can't make a
man who is tall and short at the same time similarly God almighty
..Allah subhantala cannot make a fat thin man …there
are a thousand
things I can list which God almighty can't do ….God cannot tell a lie…
the moment he tells a lie.. he ceases to be God …God cannot be
unjust…the moment he is unjust he ceases to be God…God cannot be cruel
..God cannot forget …..you can list a thousand things ..God almighty
cannot throw me out of his domain….the full world the full universe
belong to him…he can kill me, he can obliterate me, he can make me
vanish ..but he cannot throw me out of his domain …to him belongs
everything ..where will he throw me…he can kill me ,…the can
obliterate me..he can make me vanish…but he cant throw me out of his
domain …nowhere does the quraan say God can do everything ..infact
quraan says…innAllaha ala kulli shai in Qadeer… that verily Allah has
Power over all things..quraan doesn't say God can do everything…quraan
says God has power over all things…several places….surah baqrah
chapter no.2 verse no.106 surah baqrah chap 2 verse 108.. surah imran
…aali imran chapter no. 3 verse 29 in surah nahl chapter no.16 verse
no. 77 in surah faatir chapter 35 verse no.1 …several places the
quraan says the quraan says innaAllaha ala kulli shaiin Qadeer..verily
Allah has power over all things…and there is a world of a difference
between Allah can do everything and Allah has power over everything
infact Quraan says in Surah Buruj chapter no.85 verse no. 15, and 16
it says that Allah is the doer of all He intends….see whatever He
intends He can do…but God only does Godly things ..he does not do
unGodly things……. ( Is Quraan Word of God, from the CD-"Presenting
Islaam and Clarifying Misconceptions –Lecture series by Dr.Zaakir
Naik, Developed by AHYA Multi-Media- 12 Enlightening Sessions)

Respected Brothers & Sisters !
This is open challenge to the sovereignty of Almighty Allah. Allahu Akbar!
Allahu Akbar! Brother Zakir demands proof of Quran and sahih hadith in every
step from Ahle Sunnat Wa Zamaat. But he himself in lieu of producing
evidence from Quran and Sahih Hadith, plays with words and sophisticated
logics. Has he furnished any evidence from Quran and Sahih Hadith in support of
his peculiar tawhid? Muslims! Is it tawhid? Doesn't Allah say in Quran not to say of
things of Allah that you don't know? Allah Almighty says : "Say
(O Muhammad [sal-Allâhu 'alayhi wa sallam]): "(But) the things that my
Lord has indeed forbidden are Al-Fawâhish (great evil sins and every kind of
unlawful sexual intercourse) whether committed openly or secretly, sins (of all
kinds), unrighteous oppression, joining partners (in worship) with Allâh for
which He has given no authority,and saying things about Allâh
of which you have no knowledge."(Al-A'araaf: 33).
By these words Zakir Naik has disrespected Allah subhanahu Taala
and restricted His peerless and unimaginable power by the Aqal of
human beings. Allah says: "No knowledge have they of such a
thing, nor had their fathers. Mighty is the word that comes out of their
mouths. They utter nothing but a lie." (Al-Kahf: 5)

Brothers
& Sisters ! Zakir Naik's
arrogance is matchless in the 1400-years old Islamic history. Throwing
challenge to the sovereignty of the Creator? Dear Reader! Please think! Has
our beloved Sayedina Rasulullah Sallallahu alaihi Wa Sallam ever
explained the tawhid of Allah in this way? Did respected Sahabae
Keram and Ahle Bait ever dare to utter such insulting words about Allah
Subhanahu Taala? Has any Hadith-Specialist, Tafsir-Specialist and Imams ever
made such derogatory words about Allah Subhanahu Taala? Did Imam Gazzali ,
the Sultan of logic, ever dared to use such poisonous words about my
Creator? Shaykh Mainuddin Chisti converted about 90 lakh Hindus to Islaam.Did
he ever utter such polluted words? Great Missionary Shaykh Abdul Aleem
Siddiquie, the Khalifa of Ala Hazrat Imam Ahmed Reza ,
converted countless Non-Muslims to Islaam throughout the west Indies .
Has this great Missionary ever made such venomous words? No, not at all.
Dr.Zakir shows that he has not obtained the knowledge of the Sunnah of
the Rasulullah Salllallahu Alahi Wa sallam and his companions and the
Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wa Zamaat. We seek refuge to Allah from utering these
Kufri words. To save ourselves from such infectious aqidah one should always
try to remember the following verses:

Quranic Verse No 1. : “Knowest thou not that it
is Allah unto Whom belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and earth; and ye
have not, beside Allah, any friend or helper?” [2: AL–Baqarah: 107]

Quranic Verse No 3 : “ Knowest thou not that
unto Allah belongeth the Sovereignty of the heavens and the earth? He punisheth
whom He will, and forgiveth whom He will: Allah is Able to do all thigns.” [5:
AL–Ma’idah: 40]

Quranic Verse No 4 : “Lo! Allah! Unto Him
belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth. He quickeneth and He
giveth death. And ye have instead of Allah no protecting friend nor helper.” [9:
At–Taubah: 116]

Quranic Verse No 5 : “ And let not their speech
grieve thee (O Muhammad). Lo! power belongeth wholly to Allah. He is the
Hearer, the Knower.” [10: Yunus: 66]

Quranic Verse No 6 : “ Now Allah be exalted, the
true King! There is no God save Him, the Lord of the Throne of Grace.” [23:
Al–Mu’minun: 116]

Quranic Verse No
7 :
“He unto Whom belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth, He
hath chosen no son nor hath He any partner in the sovereignty. He hath created
everything and hath meted out for it a measure” [25: Al–Furqan: 2]

Quranic Verse No
8 : “And He is Allah; there is no God save
Him. His is all praise in the former and the latter (state), and His is the
command, and unto Him ye will be brought back.” [28: Al–Qasas: 70]

Quranic Verse No 10. : “ Unto Allah belongeth the
sovereignty of the heavens and the earth. He createth what He will. He
bestoweth female (off-spring) upon whom He will, and bestoweth male (offspring)
upon whom He will” –[42: Ash–Shura: 49]