Please visit our new site at www.BlueMassGroup.com

Recent Posts

Wall Street Journal to MA: Freeze to death So, the wise men of the Wall Street Journal editorial page (who, wags have said, don't read the actual fine reporting of that paper) have upbraided Rep. William Delahunt and...

"Give. Me. A. Break." Mike Wallace was on WBUR's On Point this morning. You simply must hear the one question that he would ask George Bush. I won't transcribe it, but start listening to...

Tim Murray in the Lt. Gov. race? Mariposa at Beyond 495 calls our attention to a most interesting tidbit in a holiday party invitation sent out by DDemDispatch: the invite notes that Worcester Mayor Tim Murray has...

A Teacher Runs in Foxborough An important update in the 1st Bristol race from Cos. --David There's a Democrat running in the 1st Bristol special election, but it's not Feeney. The Sun-Chronicle reported last week...

Bush Closes in On One Year Off W., who already holds the record for most vacation days ever taken by a President, is closing on a full year of R&R as the death toll in Iraq mounts,...

More Patrick campaign tea leaves .08 acres points to this Adrian Walker column about Deval Patrick, which makes this intriguing comment: "I had called after reading that one of his top consultants, Dan Payne, had...

Cashing in their chips Now this is cool ... er, warm: Mt. Wachusett Community College has reduced its heating costs and CO2 output by switching to wood chips and other biomass fuels: Instead of...

March 30, 2005

Stem Cell Debate: Freedom versus Fear

The current stem cell debate is best framed as a contest between freedom and fear. ProgressiveDemocrats believe that if we give freedom to our finest minds cures may result for scourges like Parkinson's disease, diabetes, and Multiple Sclerosis. Optimism and responsibility are watchwords.

RegressiveRepublicans fear change and scorn responsibility. These extremists, like Willard, reject hope and ignore the suffering propagated by their intolerance. They seek to impose their personal religious prejudices on the entire community.

"People suffering from Parkinson's, from deafness, from diabetes and
from a host of other diseases and conditions potentially alleviated by
stem-cell therapies should not be forced to suffer -- or die -- for the
sake of someone else's religious belief," writes the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Amen.

TrackBack

» Remember Humveal? We're one step closer - introducting HoFu from Welcome to MassRight
Remember humveal (scroll down to the comments)? We're not there yet, but we've taken a step closer: we do now have HoFu - tofu that takes like human flesh. I'll refer those who don't read my personal blog to The Catholic Testudines's Thomas A.'s&n... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 23, 2005 10:29:58 PM

Comments

I beg to differ.

The current stem cell debate is best framed as a contest between chattle ownership of human beings, and not.

a) Adult Stem Cells and cord-harvested stem cells: lots of extant therapies, lots of trials underway (including one in our area for Alzheimers), lots of promise, no significant moral or ethical considerations. Thanks in part to the Catholic Church, you can grow nerve cells from stem cells in the nose. Shades of Sleeper, I know.

b) Embryonic Stem Cells - no extant therapies, no clinical trials underway, a massive moral and ethical issue. No evidence they will work better than ASC. Harvested from a 'quickened' egg.

c) This particular instance of thereupudic Cloning - take mama's egg, inject other cell's nucleus, convince it it's been fertilized. If implanted in a uterus, it might very well become a perfectly good adult (the procedure is substantially similar to the creation of Dolly). But, instead, they let it grow a bit in vitro, abort it, and harvesting the cells they want.

How about this, instead: let's just let the thing grow to full size, in a vat, and then harvest the organs? Would that be okay?Or, we could just grow it for meat, to feed the starving masses and tsunami victims. PETA would approve. I'm sure it would be a delicacy - mmmm....humveal...

I am sorry bob, that is not fair. Reasonable people can differ on this issue. And why do you speak for all progressives.
What is a progressive anyway? Tell me bob.

Posted by: The troll | Mar 30, 2005 1:51:09 PM

Honestly, if cloning humans for spare parts is legal in the US, then I want the CloneCo World Headquarters to be in Massachusetts if that means it's not in California. I want the humveal manufacturing plant here rather than in New Jersey. The Commonwealth simply cannot afford to say "We want jobs, but not those kind of jobs."

As long as it's legal in the US, we're competing with other states for jobs, and not only scientific jobs, but also jobs for support staff -- people to build the labs, clean the labs, and be admins for the researchers.

Let the Feds worry about the ethical considerations. If Congress wants to ban it, then that's a different discussion, but for Massachusetts to unilaterally disarm is foolish.