THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.

Translate

Saturday, December 5, 2015

Will They Cancel Christmas To Appease Muslims?

Published on Dec 5, 2015

Will Christmas Trigger More Terror Attacks The notion that a Christmas party could've triggered the massacre in San Bernardino California is being pushed by some establishment analysts. This is absolutely ludicrous until you consider that all across the globe countries are inviting in refugees with the understanding that they will not be assimilating into the culture, and schools are already banning Christmas because it has the potential to offend. The United States of America is ruled by the Constitution, not the social justice agenda. DOJ To Arrest Americans Outraged By Jihadists Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Thursday at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner she will take aggressive action against the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric.” Lynch’s grandstanding before a Muslim group reveals the Justice Department and the Obama administration are promoting the so-called social justice agenda at the expense of the Constitution and the First Amendment. It also underscores the collectivist idea that government has the authority—enforced by its monopoly of coercion and violence—to protect the rights of preferred groups at the expense of the rights of the individual. Meanwhile the female shooter in San Bernadino posted her allegiance to ISIS on Facebook. And Arab Festivals in Dearborn, Michigan openly promote Sharia law. Meanwhile Obama constantly inappropriately takes jabs at the Christian faith. Attorney General Lynch, why are we supposed to be politically correct while our traditions, rights, country and lives are threatened on a daily basis? You do remember swearing in on Fredrick Douglass’ Christian Bible at your request? You do know it was Douglass who famously said, "I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.” The protection of religious freedom is the cornerstone of American Society and of course all Muslims are not hellbent on Jihad. But it turns out a percentage of them are. And those psychopaths are in the United States and mixed in with the refugees streaming in as I speak. They have no clue what Civil Rights are, nor do they care.

INFOWARS CONTEST: $1,000 FOR BEST WAR ON CHRISTMAS MEME

Create a viral War on Christmas meme and you could win big bucks!

The politically correct left is warning that Christmas and other constitutionally protected western traditions will offend religious extremists, as radical jihadists wage multiple attacks across the globe.

Infowars’ latest contest aims to declare to authoritarian leftists and ISIS that we won’t capitulate and run up a white flag, or give up our crosses, nativity scenes or Christmas trees, regardless of political correctness.

This quick-running contest awards $1,000 to the creator of thebest meme image highlighting the absurd war on Christmas. We’ll upload the best images to the Official Alex Jones Facebook page.

Infowars and Alex Jones will pick the winner and announce it on the Sunday, December 6 transmission at 5pm CST during the live show.

The deadline is only 2 days away so you’ll want to get started as soon as possible! Good luck!

Official Rules:
– Make an original “War on Christmas” meme image, send totips@infowars.com or contest@infowars.com.
– Image should include “Infowars.com” somewhere, and should be .gif or .jpeg, .jpg format
– The majority of the Content must be newly created and previously unpublished
– Multiple unique submissions are allowed and encouraged
– Winner to be selected at Infowars’ and Alex Jones’ discretion
– Deadline to enter, and winner to be announced: Sunday, December 6 at 5pm during Alex Jones Show (infowars.com/show)

Suspects had a detailed model of World Trade Center and binoculars; FBI said 'they knew' towers would be hit

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Donald Trump was right all along.

Muslims were seen celebrating the 9/11 attacks in Jersey City and beyond. And even more disturbing than that, some of them knew AHEAD OF TIME that the twin towers were going to be attacked, according to statements made to reporters by the FBI in the days after the planes hit.

A news report has emerged that corroborates the claims alluded to by Trump over the past few days.

Jersey City 9/11 Celebration Report CBS

The report, which is a WCBS newscast broadcast 6 days after the attacks, details how FBI investigators revealed that some muslim suspects living in an apartment building in Jersey City held a PRE-PLANNED rooftop party on the day of the attacks.

The task force investigators even stated that the suspects had a detailed model of the Word Trade Center, the type architects use, on the rooftop with them, along with binoculars.

The report, which is a WCBS newscast broadcast 6 days after the attacks, details how FBI investigators revealed that some muslim suspects living in an apartment building in Jersey City held a PRE-PLANNED rooftop party on the day of the attacks.

The task force investigators even stated that the suspects had a detailed model of the Word Trade Center, the type architects use, on the rooftop with them, along with binoculars.

The report, which is a WCBS newscast broadcast 6 days after the attacks, details how FBI investigators revealed that some muslim suspects living in an apartment building in Jersey City held a PRE-PLANNED rooftop party on the day of the attacks.

The task force investigators even stated that the suspects had a detailed model of the Word Trade Center, the type architects use, on the rooftop with them, along with binoculars.

From the newscast:

“Calling this a ‘hot address’ the task force investigators ordered everyone detained. They saw something else: a model of the Trade Center on the roof along with sets of binoculars. The kind of model used by an architect or engineer for a presentation an investigator told me. “They knew,” he said, “that the planes were going to hit and they wanted a ringside seat.”

The report also details how the building in question was notorious for being the home of the terrorists who carried out the first attack on the WTC with a truck bomb in 1993.

The FBI investigators made a note of how they remembered the exact building from that investigation. They should know, of course, given that they ensnared the suspects into the attackthrough informants.

CBS News - FBI Foreknowledge of the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing

The WCBS newscast is almost identical to the Washington Post report cited by Trump after he was attacked by the media for making the claims.

From the Washington Post report:

…”In Jersey City, within hours of two jetliners’ plowing into the World Trade Center, law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river.”

Not only does this corroborate the previously known fact that muslims in Jersey City did celebrate the 9/11 attacks, it reaffirms that there was widespread prior knowledge that the attacks were going to happen.

If a group of unconnected people in Jersey city knew the exact target and time of the attacks before they took place, then it is simply unbelievable that the US government did not.

With the emergence of this newscast, detractors may once again claim that this only details a small group of muslims celebrating, and not the hundreds or thousands cited by Trump and others.

However, other witness reports, such as this caller to the Howard Stern show reported “rioting” celebration by muslims in the streets in Paterson, New Jersey.

The Day After Howard Stern 9 12 01 Muslims
celebrating in street

Multiple witnesses reported this, including Carmine Sabia, the person who penned this report, posted on Infowars, which was retweeted by Trump himself last week, causing his detractors togo into meltdown on social media.

EXCERPTS: The lawsuit alleges that the officers came to the Hagan residence because a social worker was investigating a report of a messy home. The case worker wanted to inspect the home a second time, but the Hagans refused, so she called Glidden and White. Glidden first demanded to be allowed into the home and was denied permission. So, according to the complaint, he pepper-sprayed Jason and then Laura.

"Glidden then turned to Jason, who was still standing, and shot him in the back with his Taser," according to the complaint.

When Laura closed the front door, Glidden continued triggering the Taser through the closed door. Then White joined in the attack. "Together they forced open the door and found Laura and Jason lying on the floor," HSLDA said. They "slapped Laura, knocking her glasses off of her face, they threatened to shoot the family dog, they threw a telephone across the room, called Laura a 'liar,' handcuffed the parents and threatened to let Jason fall down."

The entire assault occurred in the presence of the three children, aged 13, 10 and 8. The children were taken into state custody, where they remained for months. After allegations made by social workers and the officers against the couple reached court, a judge summarily tossed the case.

________________________________________________________________

Homeschool Couple Pepper Sprayed in Front of Children Reach Settlement With Sheriff, Deputy

NEW HAMPTON, Mo. —A homeschooling couple has agreed to accept a settlement offer from a Missouri sheriff and his deputy after they filed a lawsuit for being pepper sprayed and tasered for refusing to let police in their house without a warrant.

As previously reported, the situation occurred in September 2011 after a Missouri Child Protective Services (CPS) agent had visited the home of Jason and Laura Hagan of New Hampton following a complaint of a messy home. When the caseworker sought to return a second time for a follow-up, the couple refused. CPS then called the police.

According to the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Sheriff Darren White and Chief Sheriff’s Deputy David Glidden then arrived at the home, seeking to enter. Mr. Hagan told the men that they needed to obtain a warrant from a court.

When Glidden stated that he would enter anyway, Hagan turned to go back in the house, and was consequently pepper sprayed in the back of his head, and then in his face. Mrs. Hagan was then sprayed as well.

As Mr. Hagan was still standing after the ordeal, he was then tasered, which caused him to fall to the floor just inside of the door. Mrs. Hagan then closed the door on the deputy.

But at this point, White joined Glidden on the porch, and together they busted open the Hagan’s door, forcing their way inside. They found both Mr. and Mrs. Hagan lying on the floor and began pepper spraying them again. They also sprayed a “chemical agent” on the dog and threatened that they would shoot if he did not stop barking at them.

The Hagans were then handcuffed and charged with child endangerment and resisting arrest, and the children were taken to the hospital for exposure to the pepper spray used by the sheriff and his deputy on their parents. The children at the time were ages 13, 10 and 8.

As the Hagans were then forced to appear in court to answer for the charges, a judge instead found that Glidden and White had violated the couple’s Fourth Amendment rights by forcing entry into their home without a warrant.

“All too often, law enforcement officers and child-welfare workers act as if the Fourth Amendment does not apply to CPS investigations. They are wrong,” said HSLDA Senior Counsel James Mason. “The Fourth Amendment is a legal shield that protects people from exactly the kind of mistreatment the Hagans endured.”

Therefore, as the criminal matter was dismissed against the Hagans, HSLDA filed a federal civil rights lawsuit last November against White and Glidden to seek retribution for the ordeal. While the organization provided few details this week in its update on the matter, it announced that a settlement has now been reached.

“After protracted negotiations, both the officers and the Hagans have agreed to settle the case out of court,” HSLDA reported. “With the case closed, the Hagans will be able to turn the page on this chapter of their lives.”

Officials in Norway have moved to place five children that were seized from their parents on charges that included “Christian radicalization and indoctrination” up for adoption, reports state.

As previously reported, on Nov. 16 and 17, Norway’s child welfare services, the Barnevernet, seized Marius and Ruth Bodnariu’s two daughters, two sons and their baby, Ezekiel. The two eldest children were reportedly removed from school without their parents knowledge, and then Barnevarnet representatives arrived with police at the Bodnariu home, where welfare services seized the remaining children, minus the baby.

The organization returned the following day and removed the infant as well after the family tried to resolve the matter after being arrested.

On Nov. 18, the Barnevernet told Ruth Bodnariu that the children had been split up with three separate families.

Marius Bodnariu’s brother, Daniel, who is a pastor, explained in a recent statement that the matter began when the children’s principal contacted welfare services after expressing concerns over how they were being raised, including in regard to the family’s Christian beliefs.

“The process of confiscating the Bodnariu children started when the Vevring School principal, the middle school attended by Eliana and Naomi, called the Barnevernet and expressed her concerns regarding the girls’ religious upbringing, her understanding that the girls are being disciplined at home, and that she considers the parents and grandmother to be radical Christians; an overriding concern that the principal’s perception of the parents’ and grandmother’s religious beliefs inhibit and handicap the girls’ development,” he outlined.

“In the same call to the Barnevernet, the principal stressed that she was only requesting the Barnevernet’s counseling services, as the girls are intelligent and creative, and that she, the principal, doesn’t believe that the girls are being physically abused at home,” Bodnariu said. “This same principal had previously scolded and categorically forbid one of the Bodnariu girls from singing as a result of the girl singing a Christian song to her schoolmates.”

But despite the principal’s request for counseling only, the Barnevernet instead pursued proceedings against the parents, alleging that they had abused the children.

“The Barnevernet ordered extensive medical examination of the children, as there was no evidence to support the allegations of physical abuse, but the medical reports emphasized that there was no sign of physical or mental abuse,” Bodnariu states.

He says that Norwegian officials claim that the children told them that they were abused, but the family rejects the notion.

The situation has sparked protests in the country and beyond, including on Dec. 21, when over 300 people protested at the Embassy of Norway in Bucharest, Romania. Supporters of the family held signs and banners such as “Norway, return the children to the Bodnariu family” and “Norway, give us back the children you stole.” On Dec. 26, over 400 protesters gathered in Madrid, Spain in support of the Bodnariu family, and other events are planned in the UK, Poland and Belgium.

In the meantime, the Romania Insider reports that Norwegian authorities have opened the adoption process for the children, which some believe is unlawful.

“Barnevernet is going ahead with the process of adoption because they say that such a long time has passed and now it is going to be traumatic for the children to be returned to their parents,” Cristian Ionescu, pastor of Elim Romanian Pentecostal Church in Chicago, told the Christian Post.

A gathering in support of the Bodnariu family has been scheduled for Jan. 8 at the Norwegian Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Children Seized from Parents on Charges of ‘Christian Indoctrination’ in Norway

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A Christian couple in Norway have reportedly become embroiled in a battle with social services after their five children were removed on charges that included “Christian radicalization and indoctrination.”

On Nov. 16, Norway’s child welfare services, the Barnevernet, seized Marius and Ruth Bodnariu’s two daughters, two sons and their baby, Ezekiel. The two eldest children were reportedly removed from school without their parents knowledge, and then Barnevarnet representatives arrived with police at the Bodnariu home, where welfare services seized the remaining children, minus the baby.

The organization returned the following day and removed the infant as well after the family tried to resolve the matter at the local police station.

On Nov. 18, the Barnevernet told Ruth Bodnariu that the children had been split up with two separate families.

An online petition calling for the return of the children has already been signed by over 26,000 people.

“The parents were interrogated and asked not to publicly reveal the situation so they wouldn’t aggravate their case!” text on the petition page reads in part. “They are just a normal Christian family trying to raise their children in the knowledge of God! There is no documented or otherwise abuse of any kind in this family!”

A Facebook page created to support the family, however, provides some insight from Marius Bodnariu’s brother, Daniel, who is a pastor. He explained in a statement on Wednesday that the children’s principal contacted welfare services after expressing concerns over how they were being raised, including in regard to the family’s Christian beliefs.

“The girls told her they are being disciplined at home. [She also said that] the girls are ‘challenging’ in the sense that they talk a lot and do not want to obey the school rules, but are creative and intelligent,” Daniel Bodnariu outlined.

“In her message she also said that the parents are faithful Christians, ‘very Christian’ and the grandmother has a strong faith that God punishes sin, which, in her opinion, creates a disability in children,” he said. “The complaint further says that although the girls are distinguished by good results at school and that she does not believe them to be physically abused at home, she believes that the parents need ‘help’ and guidance from the Barnevernet into raising their children.”

In a hearing on Monday, the Bodnariu family lost their appeal against the removal of their children. The court ruled that the couple could visit their three month old twice a week for two hours, as well as their sons, but could not visit their daughters.

Says “violent” language directed at Muslims unacceptable

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Thursday at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner she will take aggressive action against the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric.”

She told the group “we stand with you” and promised the Justice Department will protect Muslims from “violence” and discrimination.

“When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American,” said Lynch. “They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

Lynch did not clarify what “actions predicated on violent talk” means and did not draw a line between constitutionally protected free speech and violence. She also did not pinpoint individuals or groups she believes participate in “violent talk.”

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano notes “the willingness alone to use violence is not criminal; it is only the actual use of violence that is. Thus, it is the manifestation of hatred as lawless violence that may be prosecuted, but the manifestation of hatred as a unifying idea is protected and may not be prosecuted.”

The First Amendment “absolutely bars the government from interference with a person’s thoughts or associations” prior to any violent activity.

Lynch’s grandstanding before a Muslim group reveals the Justice Department and the Obama administration are promoting the so-called social justice agenda at the expense of the Constitution and the First Amendment.

It also underscores the collectivist idea that government has the authority—enforced by its monopoly of coercion and violence—to protect the rights of preferred groups at the expense of the rights of the individual.

_____________________________________________________________

Attorney says her GREATEST FEAR is violence against MUSLIMS, will PROSECUTE ‘anti-Muslim’ speech!

Published on Dec 5, 2015

In a long-winded answer to a question at the “Muslim Advocates Dinner” Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch tells the audience that violence against Muslims is her “greatest fear,” and promises that the Department of Justice will prosecute any “hate speech” against Muslims, especially that which leads to violence.

In her answer, Lynch says that her “greatest fear” is violence against Muslims, and that any “anti-Muslim speech” that leads to violence will be prosecuted. Now, I don’t think that speech calling for violence should be ignored, but she’s advocating that speech that merely leads to violence be prosecuted – that could be ANY speech against Muslims.

Should that really be the focus of the Department of Justice just two days after 14 Americans were slaughtered by Muslims?

DOJ Vows To Arrest Americans Who Talk Bad About Muslims

Published on Dec 5, 2015

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Thursday at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner she will take aggressive action against the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric.”

Lynch’s grandstanding before a Muslim group reveals the Justice Department and the Obama administration are promoting the so-called social justice agenda at the expense of the Constitution and the First Amendment. It also underscores the collectivist idea that government has the authority—enforced by its monopoly of coercion and violence—to protect the rights of preferred groups at the expense of the rights of the individual.

DOJ To Arrest Americans Outraged By Jihadists

Published on Dec 4, 2015

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said Thursday at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner she will take aggressive action against the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric.”

Lynch’s grandstanding before a Muslim group reveals the Justice Department and the Obama administration are promoting the so-called social justice agenda at the expense of the Constitution and the First Amendment. It also underscores the collectivist idea that government has the authority—enforced by its monopoly of coercion and violence—to protect the rights of preferred groups at the expense of the rights of the individual.

Attorney General Lynch, why are we supposed to be politically correct while our traditions, rights, country and lives are threatened on a daily basis?You do remember swearing in on Fredrick Douglass’ Christian Bible at your request? You do know it was Douglass who famously said, "I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.” The protection of religious freedom is the cornerstone of American Society and of course all Muslims are not hellbent on Jihad. But it turns out a percentage of them are. And those psychopaths are in the United States and mixed in with the refugees streaming in as I speak. They have no clue what Civil Rights are, nor do they care.

Maybe Attorney General Lynch is right. Maybe America needs to become as intolerant of free speech as Obama's friends in China, where according to the Wall Street Journal “A Chinese court sentenced a well-known free-speech activist to six years in prison on Friday, at least the fourth Communist Party critic sentenced in a week amid a sustained crackdown on dissent.” Or the benefactors behind 9/11 according to the classified 28 pages of the 9/11 she chooses to ignore while the Justice Department pretends to do its job by prosecuting Soccer Executives rather than the Saudi Arabians. Who according to the Guardian “A Palestinian poet and leading member of Saudi Arabia’s nascent contemporary art scene has been sentenced to death for renouncing Islam. “

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Despite the numerous Scriptures warnings given by Jesus himself, Seventh Day Adventist and presidential candidate Ben Carson told The Washington Post that he does not believe in hell.

“I don’t believe there is a physical place where people go and are tormented,” he stated. “No. I don’t believe that.”

As previously reported, Seventh Day Adventists believe in the “annihilation of the wicked,” rejecting the doctrine of eternal torment out of their assertion that the Bible doesn’t teach about a permanent place called Hell, but rather the snuffing out of the soul.

“How repugnant to every emotion of love and mercy, and even to our sense of justice, is the doctrine that the wicked dead are tormented with fire and brimstone in an eternally burning hell; that for the sins of a brief earthly life they are to suffer torture as long as God shall live,” wrote founder Ellen White in “The Great Controversy Between Christ and Satan.”

“The theory of eternal torment is one of the false doctrines that constitute the wine of the abomination of Babylon, of which she makes all nations drink … They received it from Rome,” she asserted.

The early Church “did not [believe the Scriptures meant] eternal punishing, but rather punishment in the world to come that ends in cessation of being,” also asserted Adventist author LeRoy Edwin Froom in as outlined in “The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers.”

Carson said that while he doesn’t believe Hell is a physical place, he does believe that Heaven is literal. However, he suggested that souls sleep until the Second Coming of Christ.

“The Bible says when you die, you know, there is no soul that kind of floats away. But essentially, when you die, the next thing you know is the coming of Christ because you don’t know anything when you’re dead,” he told the Washington Post. “If you’re dead for a second or a thousand years, it’s the same. But when he comes, according to the book of First Corinthians, that the sound of the archangel will rise and that’s when things happen.”

In Matthew 25:41, in speaking of the separation between the sheep and the goats, Jesus said, “Then shall He say also unto them on the left hand, ‘Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.'”

“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal,” He outlined.

Jesus also spoke of the punishment of Hell in the parable of the rich man and the beggar Lazarus.

“And in Hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom,” Jesus explained in Luke 16:23. “And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am tormented in this flame.”

“[I]t is better for thee to enter into the Kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into Hell fire, where the worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched,” He also warned in Mark 9:47-48.

A biology professor at the University of California, Irvine subjected his class to an off-topic discourse on gun control Thursday in response to the San Bernardino shootings.

In a video provided to Campus Reform by Peter Van Voorhis, a student in the class, Prof. Richard Symanski advises his introductory-level Biological Sciences 1A course—specifically singling out the many freshmen that he knew would be in attendance—that if they are looking for a cause with which to become involved, they should “probably jump on this gun issue,” noting that it “just boggles my mind every time I think about it.”

He succinctly summarized his “pitch” at the end of the discourse, saying, “If you want a cause—want to get on a bandwagon—then get these guns outlawed, and do something about the Second Amendment.”

“I am totally for people expressing their opinions, but when professors do it, they have a captive audience,” Van Voorhis told Campus Reform. “If I could debate him, I would win.”

Symanski’s remarks were inspired by the shooting in San Bernardino, California Wednesday afternoon, but he tied that into the subject of mass shootings in general, asserting that the National Rifle Association (NRA) is to blame for those tragedies because it opposes gun control, and contending that “automatic weapons” should be a common-sense exception to the Second Amendment.

“We are in a situation where Australia had a situation like ours a number of years ago, and Australia said, ‘look we’re just losing too many people’ … [and they] went out and bought guns from everybody; now it is extremely difficult to buy a gun in Australia and very few people get killed.”

Symanski then informed the class of “an article in the paper that said literally, and I’m not exaggerating,” that a mass shooting happens in this country “every single day,” on average.

“Who’s the big culprit of this?” he asked in a tone that discouraged hand-raising. “It’s the NRA—the National Rifle Association—which is enormously powerful in this country, in a way that you and I can’t imagine.”

Symanski lamented that the NRA’s central argument—that people, not guns, are responsible for violence—have never made sense to him, because he considers people to be incapable of resisting the universal urge to pull the trigger when firearms are at hand.

“Look,we’re all sort of off the edge at some point, right? We don’t know when we’re going to fly off edge. And what does the issue become? The issue becomes do we have access to a gun or an AK47 or an automatic weapon? If we don’t have access to the damn thing we can’t kill anybody.”

Later, as if sharing a secret with the class, Symanski observed that “theSecond Amendment to the Constitution came into play at the end of the 18th century,” when muzzleloaders were the technological state-of-the-art.

“We had a muzzleloader that took five minutes to load the goddamn thing, and then unless I was this close somebody I couldn’t hit them, it was impossible,” he exclaimed. “We’re not dealing with a muzzleloader that takes five minutes to load; we’re dealing with automatic weapons, that are just bang-bang-bang, and like that you can kill 12, 14 people.”

Van Voorhis told Campus Reform that he was almost surprised that his sole attempt at recording Prof. Symanski was so productive, because while Symanski typically wears his liberalism on his sleeve, the gun control lecture was a rare deviation from topics relevant to the course material, as Symanski tends to focus his ire on opponents to the theory of evolution, which he allegedly denies is a theory.

“The general tone of the course is generally pretty scientific, but it is somewhat in your face,” he said. “You can tell he has, in my opinion, something of a disdain for people who are religious. He mentioned that he grew up Catholic, but doesn’t believe it anymore.”

Van Voorhis told Campus Reform that he has generally gone with the liberal flow in the past, but that he could not resist bringing this particular incident to light because it was so flagrant.

“I’m a very vocal person, but I’ve never spoken out as a conservative in class,” he explained. “I’ve actually just pretended to be liberal, because there’s no point in me sacrificing my GPA and my future just to prove them wrong.”

Prof. Symanski (whose faculty profile bears the Cuban flag as a backdrop even though Van Voorhis attests that he is of self-proclaimed Polish descent) could not be reached for comment at press time, but this article will be updated if and when he responds.

PAYPAL.ME-SUPPORT THIS BLOG

INFOWARS: THE FOURTH ESTATE, NOT STAR WARS

Adolf Hitler

ACTS 5:29

“Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.”

GEORGE WASHINGTON:

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

THOMAS JEFFERSON 1800

"I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

GOD ABOVE GOVERNMENT

Bible Obedience; Civil Disobedience

DISCLAIMER

Disclaimer: We are not responsible for all views posted on this website. Authors of articles, videos and/or selected texts are solely responsible for the content of their material. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Those sharing stories or testimonies are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of www.ratherexposethem.blogspot.com and/or its author.Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Total Pageviews

Content in full or in part may be copyrighted.. Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger.