Incentive peanut butter

I’m worried that Duncan (and George Miller) is facing increasing pressure to spread the $4.3B Incentive fund around like political peanut butter.The skeptical side of me worries that it will be used to procure health care votes.

There’s not much of a constituency for real change and few states that could actually make good use of the funds; my current short list:

·FL: enough residual Bush leadership

·RI: Mayoral Academies are a breakthrough for new schools

·LA: Pastorek is the best and most aggressive state leader we have (interesting that he’s an outsider…)

·CO: strong leadership in Denver and from Lt. Gov

Bubble states:

·NY: maybe Klein can apply for the state

·TX: lots of great charter development

·GA: Bev Hall has been a steady hand in Atlanta and BAEO President Gerard Robinson is now leading the state charter board

I’ve probably missed one, making 8 states ripe for change.There’s certainly not twice that many, but there will be increasing pressure to include three times that many in the Incentive fund.

1 COMMENT

Yeah, thank god we finally are completely purging of all those Gates funded initiatives in Rhode Island and getting ready for some real change. Just wait until our first 75 mayoral academy students graduate in 2023. It is going to be reform-tastic.

[…] singles out Rhode Island Mayoral Academies for putting Rhode Island on the national map as one of four states he thinks should be the focus of the Obama administration’s “Race to the Top… for education […]

I’m all in favor of universal health care (my dad has spent 35 years fighting for it). The point is that Duncan is facing intense pressure to spread the Incentive fund around instead of concentrating it where important advances can be made. Having 6-8 states that achieve some important breakthroughs is more important than backfilling in complacent states.