Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama made their final push across Pennsylvania, rallying their committed supporters and seeking to win over a dwindling lot of undecided voters in the most expensive — and exhaustive — presidential primary in state history.

Say no to fat-cats’ and lobbyists’ influence. HRC has been funded by more lobbyists than any Democratic or Republican candidate. Obama has been funded by 1.3 million donors. Twenty-one of HRC’s fat-cat backers sent a threatening letter to Nancy Pelosi asking her to change her comments about superdelegates…an example of the Washington game-playing that’s been going on too long. Time to end the gridlock and turn the page. Obama ‘08

Sen Clinton has gone nuts – look at what she has to say – she sounds totally Bush like:Headlines from abcnews – Clinton on Iran Attack: ‘Obliterate Them’
Hillary: If Iran Attacked Israel With Nukes ‘We Would Be Able to Totally Obliterate Them’

OMG! Iran, Persia is an ancient civilization. Its a sophisticated culture. Although it is true that their regime is anything but perfect, the Iranians are a fine people. Sen Clinton reminds us of Bush when he went on his speech about the axis of evil – demonizing so many nations and cultures.

This is not the future for the 21st century. We have to stop this kind of thinking on the part of the US, tis kind of bullying stance, no wonder people abroad do not think too kindly about our great country. Sigh. The Quakers in Pennsylvania will feel so pained.

The reason PA has been the most expensive primary in history is because Obama has outspent Hillary by at least 3-1. He’s spent Millions, but he’s still going to lose, as he already conceded today. He hasn’t won any of the big states, and he’ll never win them in November. Hillary is the only chance the Democrats have to defeat John McCain. Without her, and her supporters, McCain wins. Hillary ’08

Hillary said this morning on ABC that she would obliterate Iran? My word. She is worse than McCain. Yeah, she would do good in Middle East negotiations with Iran, I am sure. Oh my goodness. How can we have her shooting off her mouth like that? Obliterate… that means leaving no one alive. How can she claim to have international experience? That is awful. She must be trying to pretend she is John Wayne. Where is the outcry?

I’m not surprised that Sen. Obama and Sen. Casey are together and Gov. Rendell isn’t around Sen. Clinton in these shots today. Perhaps he’s off at another Louis Farrakhan love-fest. It’s the hypocrisy, stupid! I don’t think Sen. Clinton should have to denounce and reject Gov. Rendell because of his embrace of the Minister … but aren’t the goose and gander getting closer together??? Doubt me? Check this clip out….

” ‘I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,’ Clinton said. ‘In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.’ ”

Is this what she’s means by “heat”?

No, these are not the words of a Commander in Chief. These are the words of a Megalomaniac.

This blog has been hijacked by the far left liberals who hate Clinton with a passion. You might hate Clinton, but do you need to hate your country too? That’s a question all Democrats should be asking themselves. Obama will not win in November. If you want to see a Democrat in the White House, you have no choice but to vote for Clinton. And if she gets the nomination, she will definitely win the White House.

Yes, Logan, we need someone like Hillary Clinton who is not afraid to defend the country from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. That is the first duty of government. Hilllary Clinton gives me the confidence that she will go to war if necessary.

” ‘I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,’ Clinton said. ‘In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.’ ”

Is this what she’s means by “heat”?

I certainly hope that is what she means by heat. A tough person is needed as president. I favor defending Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East. Hillary has guts. The liberals are whimps. The only problem for Hillary is that the liberals do not understand that the world is not sitting down for an international Woodstock. Hillary as commander-in-chief will let me sleep at night. She also had the courage to say what alienates the LIBER-ALS, who never do live in the real world. War in part of real life. Hillary is good Democrat.

” ‘I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,’ Clinton said. ‘In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.’ ”

Is this what she’s means by “heat”?

No, these are not the words of a Commander in Chief. These are the words of a Megalomaniac.

— Posted by Logan

Appeasement policies don’t have a good track record

Your comment does not make any sense. (I have not taken the trouble to check the full accuracy of your truncated quote).

An attack on Israel by Iran would be tantamount to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, insofar as Western interests are concerned.

I think the amount of money that Senator Obama is spending in Pennsylvania is great for the economy of Pennsylvania (and any other State, here on end). I, for one, am glad to see my money being reinvested into Pennsylvania. And, the fact that he has the money speaks volumes about the number of people who are supporting him.

And for those who may chide him for his expenditures even though he may not “Win,” I think he’s spending his money wisely considering that he has faced an uphill battle against the name recognition that Clinton has, and the Rendell operation.

Hillary Clinton’s latest ad in Pennsylvania, demonstrating how tough the job of president is, contains a selection of historical events, including the depression, the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Cuban Missile Crisis, etc. One of the images is that of Osama bin Laden. However, I wouldn’t press that last one too much if I were her — bin Laden bombed the World Trade Center the first time around in 1993, on Bill Clinton’s watch, and he attacked the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam in 1998–while husband Bill was busy with Monica. Indeed, during those eight years, al-Qaeda was building itself up without Bill taking much notice, and we know what that led to in 2001.

i hope Hillary wins the PA primary. Obama is weak and does not share American values. No matter how many photo-ops there are of Obama, nobody will convince me that he believes in what this country stands for. Hillary may be outspent, but I hope that the people in PA who vote tomorrow realize that Obama is a fake. Hillary is the real deal.

Hilary’s recent blunder with the bin laden commercial will only cost her votes. Her feeble strategy to employ the politics of fear to get what she wants will back fire. In this day in age, her Bush like tactics of arousing fear to control behavior are so transparent its pathetic. Just another good reason why its time to get rid of the old Washington game book and its devoted players.

I wonder about that pic of Clinton looking thoughtful on the runway. Remember, her campaign owes millions and millions. They owe people as far back as the first Iowa primary. You think one of them managed somehow to get her cellphone number?

You gotta love the fabulously rich populist who can’t bother paying the vendors.

If Bill was focused on the national affairs instead of having affairs with government paid interns and wasting 80M dollars in enquiries putting this nation through an impeachment – may be just may be – he could have gone after bin Laden when he was a manifest target. The lady did not even read the NIE before voting against Iran (I am willing to grant her the excuse on Iraq). The lunatic is trying bait some of us into saying something by mistake a positive on Iran, so that she could turn it against Obama supporters and drive another wedge. Shame on you Billary.
It is time you won up the disaster in Iraq and Bin Laden – both problems grew in momentum in your hubby’s administration.

And you would prefer that your president do what in the event that Iran, now generally considered to be the biggest emerging security threat in the region, launched an attack against Israel?

Convene UN meetings maybe? Send in Obama’s ivory-tower radical envoys to sit down and negotiate with the likes of Ahmadinejad?

The US response to a geopolitical security crisis of this severity and magnitude anywhere in the world would be the same.

Consider what the US would need to do if, say, North Korea were to actually launch an attack on Japan. North Korea, for all its saber rattling and overheated threats over the years, will probably never do that, though, precisely because they know that the response would in fact be something on the order of “obliteration.”

This is known as deterrence. History has taught us that you can’t charm and cajole the likes of Kim Jong-il and Ahmadinejad to the bargaining table. They have to be compelled into an awareness that that is the only sensible choice, if only to avert their own utter “obliteration.”

Billary’s paid operatives, please stop posing as free thinkers. I know that some of you are paid to post here. I regret to break it to you – HRC is broke – you will left with a pink slip. Chapter 11 notices is far from green $ – no pay at the end. I am sorry.

On Clinton saying she would obliterate Iran, I guess this is the last stage in her transformation from a centrist Democrat to a neocon.

Two things:

1. Israel itself is a nuclear power (although no one will ever bring it up). I don’t think Iranians are stupid enough to attack a nuclear power.

2. In the past, Clinton has refused to answer hypothetical questions about doomsday scenarios (which I always thought was quite smart on her part). What made her answer this one — and in the way she did — we will never know.

Hillary is just the type of Democrat that is needed. She is capable of moving the party to the center and away from the liberal wing, which destroyed the Democrats.

What the heck is wrong with using strong language like “obliterate Iran.?” It puts them on notice. It puts the world on notice that the U.S. is not a country that will stand by idly when its interests are threatened. How does anyone know what the U.S. will face over the course of the next four years? None of us knows. It certainly is a welcome change from the usual wishy-washy Dmeocratic gab-fest that loses elections. Elections are lost on many issues, including defense. The party of FDR/Truman would not still be fighting WWII. It would have lost it if today’s liberals had control. How many elections do the Democrats need to lose before they get it? Tough talk can avoid war. Wishy-washy talk is the talk of losers. Everyone understood Hillary. She was perfectly clear. That is what is needed.

April 21st,2008 9:05pm Obama Is black but he is also white. Why is it that the news keep separating the two? If we support him He is young can get the job done also!! He has enough informed constiguents to help him including Hilliary.Why don’t we leave color out of this election altogether. He will bring all cultures together!!!

This is like a young person out of college of even High school. When they go in for an interview for a job. First question asked is : How much experience has you got? Or, Sorry you don’t have enough ecperience. Give the man a chance everyone! He will make you proud!!!He can pull this nation together!!!!

President Obama drew criticism on Thursday when he said, “we don’t have a strategy yet,” for military action against ISIS in Syria. Lawmakers will weigh in on Mr. Obama’s comments on the Sunday shows.Read more…