SearchConfiguration.NextSiblinghttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/vstsqualitytools/archive/2010/04/10/searchconfiguration-nextsibling.aspxNote: Cross posted from Siddhartha Pandey - MSFT .
Permalink
In this post I will be describing what does NextSibling means in context of search. But before doing that I will mention the ways in which search can happen. There are two ways (exclusiveen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)re: SearchConfiguration.NextSiblinghttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/vstsqualitytools/archive/2010/04/10/searchconfiguration-nextsibling.aspx#10480889Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:38:34 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10480889Coded UI Tester<p>User &#39;me&#39; is right, bad text in bad language and with errors.</p>
<p>Useless.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10480889" width="1" height="1">re: SearchConfiguration.NextSiblinghttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/vstsqualitytools/archive/2010/04/10/searchconfiguration-nextsibling.aspx#10363952Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:38:54 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10363952me<p>Bad text in bad language. And with error! </p>
<p>Why is E sibling of D in Example2. D is parent of E.</p>
<p>Sorry, useless.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10363952" width="1" height="1">re: SearchConfiguration.NextSiblinghttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/vstsqualitytools/archive/2010/04/10/searchconfiguration-nextsibling.aspx#10322266Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:51:59 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10322266I have a Problem with manually adding the NextSibling search criteria<p>When I record and Action or an Assertion, the Recorder dos not use the NextSibling SearchConfiguration. &nbsp;Yet when my test is running in and Automated Fashion on a Test Agent it takes for ever to find message boxes of and application or and Ok button in and Application Sometimes. &nbsp;I can manually code the SearchConfiguration to spec NextSibling, but then it gets wiped out when I try to update a Text field Assertion for the next Version so another Assertion in the same UIMAP will work write. &nbsp;If out project had one Assertion and One Action this would be ok. &nbsp;I could just rerecord the Assertion and re-hand code the Action every release (In Our Case is every week). &nbsp;But I have 20 applications with Hundreds of test. &nbsp;The recorder won’t work with Multiple UIMAP with Specific names so each application has all its Actions and Assertions in the Same UIMAP. &nbsp;So how is this kind of Unit testing (Face it any company) feasible? &nbsp;Or did I miss something in this article? &nbsp;I mean I am open to suggestions.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10322266" width="1" height="1">