13-7-16-9-13-3-9
I find this guy interesting. To me, he designs himself at 13-7-16-15-17-3-13, possibly 15-7-16-15-17-3-11, not sure what style. As an offensive, he's handicapped by the low speed, as a defensive, he's handicapped by the low con. I have had success with low speed lungers in the past, but I'm not sure if that's the way I want to go. One interesting note, Terrablood's simulator gives him a better chance for Tremendous damage with the 13 strength (I'm guessing due to small sample size).

I may never run this guy. I don't really plan on playing this team, and he's unlikely to make any tourney rosters with my limited budget, but I'm curious what others think.
Guido

Should get great damage with a decent shot at good endurance. Look for Ex ATT making it +4. You can also see any DEF bonus on this guy if he gets Incredibly Quick and Elusive.

_________________A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Street_Legal on Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:03 pm; edited 3 times in total

The ConsortiumArchMaster Poster

Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 8976
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting

Posted:
Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:42 am

Guido wrote:

13-7-16-9-13-3-9
I find this guy interesting. To me, he designs himself at 13-7-16-15-17-3-13, possibly 15-7-16-15-17-3-11, not sure what style. As an offensive, he's handicapped by the low speed, as a defensive, he's handicapped by the low con. I have had success with low speed lungers in the past, but I'm not sure if that's the way I want to go. One interesting note, Terrablood's simulator gives him a better chance for Tremendous damage with the 13 strength (I'm guessing due to small sample size).

I may never run this guy. I don't really plan on playing this team, and he's unlikely to make any tourney rosters with my limited budget, but I'm curious what others think.
Guido

We prefer the 15ST/11DF version and as a ST where natural quickness and decise can hopefully overcome the low SP.

My design philosophy is that if it isn't 17 or higher wit, I de-emphasize wit. This guy looks better to me doing just that.

15-11-16-11-17-3-11 looks like a reasonable hybrid.
13-13-16-10-19-3-10 looks like a fun burner

One of those designs is most likely what I'd choose.

_Buri_Grandmaster Poster

Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: 884
Location: Asgard

Posted:
Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:42 am

Assurnasirbanipal wrote:

My design philosophy is that if it isn't 17 or higher wit, I de-emphasize wit. .

I kind of do the same thing, but I'll go with a 15 WT if I can get it. Usually the same rule for WL, but a lot more flexible there, it depends on the other numbers.

As for this warrior in general, if it's not on a team already I wouldn't recommend running it, in hopes of a TV. I've had a whole slew of guys like this, I went through a size 17 kick a while back, graduated 2 LU out of about 10. I can tell you that they do about .500 in tourneys and a bit better in arenas.