Topspinmoron, I just fail to see how 9 slams can be greater than 16 slams, simple maths here if you ask me

It ain't just that.

What sums it up is if Federer played his A game every match, he would win.

If Nadal played his A game every match, he wouldn't always win (unless it was clay)- there are guys, particularly on hardcourt, whose A game will beat Rafa's A game if they are 'on'. Whereas if Roger is 'on' against anyone, he wins. It's simple really. It's all about game style.

Number of slams is a clown argument when defining greatness but age on the other hand is a relevant?!?!

As I told so many times, undisputed GOAT = Chang

Once again you fail to grasp the point. Nadal, at 24, achieved more than Federer at the same age, so who's to say he can't surpass him when it's all said and done? You, on the other hand, are trying to compare a career of a guy who's pretty much done winning slams, vs a guy who just entered his peak.

At the risk of looking rather silly here, may i ask, What does the GOAT argument have to do with Djokovic winning a slam in 2011?.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slade's Motivational Coach

By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda on tennis forums, one can make an extremely skilled and talented player appear to be a fluke and even make a clueless mug sound like one of the greatest players to have ever graced the sport.

Once again you fail to grasp the point. Nadal, at 24, achieved more than Federer at the same age, so who's to say he can't surpass him when it's all said and done? You, on the other hand, are trying to compare a career of a guy who's pretty much done winning slams, vs a guy who just entered his peak.

Again, before gloating on every thread about how Rafa is the undisputed GOAT follow your own advice and wait till "everything is said and done"!!! Tennis history showed us how tough it is to dominate the tour over a long period, so chances are high that Rafa won't win everything in sight till he retires you know... :retard:

By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda on tennis forums, one can make an extremely skilled and talented player appear to be a fluke and even make a clueless mug sound like one of the greatest players to have ever graced the sport.

P.Clowntonius is the worst of all Federer fans: Gloater (always brings out 16>>>X whenever losing an argument), arrogant, cocky and makes excuses for his idol's every loss in every thread, always failing to acknowledge other players' accomplishments just like Federer himself - no class.

Try to be sympathetic. He's going trough a difficult time now that Federer is slumping and Nadal and Djokvic are playing in the Slam finals. Must be hard to accept

That slam wasn't a fluke, he destroyed Federer in 3 sets. It was a great match

Thats pathetic. Its like me playing a cripple in life, taking advantage and bragging to my mates about it. WOnder what happened to that might spartan at that tourney

@Topspindoctor, its pretty simple. Yeah rafa started his shit earlier than Fed but he gona finish earlier aswel. He has already suffered many injuries..and due to is gamestyle im sure they where will more. Hes not a machine ffs. You act as if there will be no decent players breaking through.

The sma arguement is the most important thing..thats why Fed chased it for so long and showed so much emotion when doing so. I dont give a shit about Rafa future. Right 16>>>>9...and thats what matters, along with Feds many other records that will neva be broken i.e the 24 slam semi record