Cisco Learning Home: Message Listhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/?view=discussions
Most recent forum messagesenMon, 05 Oct 2009 06:27:59 GMTJive Engage 7.0.3.1 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/)2009-10-05T06:27:59ZenRe: Nexus Traininghttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/36122?tstart=0#36122
Hi Paulsa, &nbsp; I would recommend looking at FastLane for Nexus trainings. They are Cisco premier training solution provider. Compared to Global Knowledge, who so far do the training on the Nexus Emulation Software, FastLane offers access to realMon, 05 Oct 2009 06:27:59 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/36122?tstart=0#361222009-10-05T06:27:59Z5 years 6 months ago20Re: Spanning tree question !https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29206?tstart=0#29206
Hi, &nbsp; just one addition to the topic, everything else has already been explained: &nbsp; You still could change the priority scheme back to the old one explained by Scott in an earlier posting, however neither Cisco best practices nor I wouldMon, 03 Aug 2009 13:51:13 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29206?tstart=0#292062009-08-03T13:51:13Z5 years 8 months ago0Re: MST Spanning Tree Mode - Why Is It There?https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29205?tstart=0#29205
Mike, &nbsp; Sudeep Khuraijam is fully right about the benefits concerning spanning-tree instances if you use MST. I give you one example from what I have seen in real life in the past. &nbsp; Using an old Catalyst 4006 switch and supervisor IIMon, 03 Aug 2009 13:34:35 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29205?tstart=0#292052009-08-03T13:34:35Z5 years 8 months ago0Re: MST Configuration Questionhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29204?tstart=0#29204
Jarred, &nbsp; I think there are two reasons why Cisco implemented the MST configuration as is. &nbsp; 1) Different from Per-VLAN-SpanningTree (PVST+) where each VLAN is running in its own spanning-tree process, MST has all VLANs mapped to an MSTMon, 03 Aug 2009 13:18:18 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29204?tstart=0#292042009-08-03T13:18:18Z5 years 8 months ago0Re: Data Center Designhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29203?tstart=0#29203
Hi, &nbsp; one important thing to know concerning the use of Nexus 50x0 in combination with the&nbsp; Nexus 2148 FabricExtender (FEX) at the access-layer for gigabit copper connections, is the fact that the FEX only supports 1Gbit/s. These interfacesMon, 03 Aug 2009 12:44:51 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/29203?tstart=0#292032009-08-03T12:44:51Z5 years 8 months ago0Re: DC implementation experiences VTP issueshttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/25027?tstart=0#25027
Hi Bjorn, &nbsp; you're absolutely right, in that problem scenario we did experience STP-problems with all the fun and joy... &nbsp; Best regards /RalphThu, 18 Jun 2009 17:01:30 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/25027?tstart=0#250272009-06-18T17:01:30Z5 years 9 months ago0Re: DC implementation experiences VTP issueshttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/21630?tstart=0#21630
Hi bloken, &nbsp; how do you run VTP v3? Really (primary-)server-client or all switches in server mode with one primary? &nbsp; My experience from the past using VTP v1,v2 and v3 on CatOS in a PVLAN infrastuctureisn't very encouraging. &nbsp; GuessThu, 07 May 2009 08:13:08 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/21630?tstart=0#216302009-05-07T08:13:08Z5 years 11 months ago20Re: Datacenter implementation experienceshttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/21489?tstart=0#21489
Hi Bjorn, &nbsp; I'd be interested in your experiences as well. We've recently startet with the design process for a new DC based on Nexus 7010 (might become 7018) as Core/Aggregation and Nexus 5020 MoR with 2148 FEX ToR for gigabit access. 10GEWed, 06 May 2009 11:59:02 GMTbounce@learningnetwork.cisco.comhttps://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/21489?tstart=0#214892009-05-06T11:59:02Z5 years 11 months ago0