Magnitude 7.2 WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA January 10, 2012-------------------------------------------------------------​---

What does this all mean???

It means the statistical arguments that so-called skeptics attempt to use to debunk certain predictors hitting exact dates for major quakes over and over (generally within 3-4 days), not only debunks these pseudo-skeptics and that pseudo-argument, but if you look at the stats, they also debunk their argument and premise about 7+ quakes allegedly following a predictable pattern that can be PREDICTED!

And since the average for such quakes has already PEAKED for December and been met within the first 10 days of a 31 day month, the ODDS are STACKED against another 7+ occurring.

Or in other words, if just 1 more 7+ hits in December connected to "certain" QUAKE WARNINGS for 7+, the skeptics "STATS" argument is debunked and defunct permanently IMHO.

So if this happens, its gonna be very interesting to see how many of these skeptics are honest enough to start scrutinizing their own skepticism and consider NEW paradigms that challenged their out-moded standard models.

Now ccording to skeptics and the "STATS", the chance for a MAJOR 7+ occurring even 1 more time this month, especially on a specific DATE predicted/warned within 1-3 days, let alone an EXACT DATE warned, is almost NIL,,, not to mention if one has readings of an 8+ or MEGA-QUAKE... OH, and add to the mix, the 188 ley line factor of 50 - which raises the stakes to an even more difficult parameter.

So how about this...

a CHALLENGE ... SKEPTICS VERSUS QUAKE PREDICTORS!

WILL there or won't there be another 7 MAG.... That is the question!

There's 18 days left in the month I'll put down the 16th & 17th +-1 day and the 21st to 22nd +-1 day

------------------------------------------------In this corner we have the usual suspects...

Magnitude 7.2 WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA January 10, 2012-------------------------------------------------------------​---

What does this all mean???

It means the statistical arguments that so-called skeptics attempt to use to debunk certain predictors hitting exact dates for major quakes over and over (generally within 3-4 days), not only debunks these pseudo-skeptics and that pseudo-argument, but if you look at the stats, they also debunk their argument and premise about 7+ quakes allegedly following a predictable pattern that can be PREDICTED!

And since the average for such quakes has already PEAKED for December and been met within the first 10 days of a 31 day month, the ODDS are STACKED against another 7+ occurring.

Or in other words, if just 1 more 7+ hits in December connected to "certain" QUAKE WARNINGS for 7+, the skeptics "STATS" argument is debunked and defunct permanently IMHO.

So if this happens, its gonna be very interesting to see how many of these skeptics are honest enough to start scrutinizing their own skepticism and consider NEW paradigms that challenged their out-moded standard models.

Now ccording to skeptics and the "STATS", the chance for a MAJOR 7+ occurring even 1 more time this month, especially on a specific DATE predicted/warned within 1-3 days, let alone an EXACT DATE warned, is almost NIL,,, not to mention if one has readings of an 8+ or MEGA-QUAKE... OH, and add to the mix, the 188 ley line factor of 50 - which raises the stakes to an even more difficult parameter.

So how about this...

a CHALLENGE ... SKEPTICS VERSUS QUAKE PREDICTORS!

WILL there or won't there be another 7 MAG.... That is the question!

There's 18 days left in the month I'll put down the 16th & 17th +-1 day and the 21st to 22nd +-1 day

------------------------------------------------In this corner we have the usual suspects...

Re: STATISTICAL MONTHLY AVERAGE OF MAGNITUDE 7+ QUAKES EXCEEDED IN ONLY FIRST 10 DAYS OF DECEMBER?!?!? SKEPTIC CHALLENGE PART 2!

Boring....

All those 7s and 8s this year and very few casualties. I think not even 1000 deaths.

In the meantime, we had Gangnam Style further define the limits of human stupidity.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29851614

Actually, what defines a NEW LOW in human stupidity which now has no limits, is the IRONY, ignorance and utter idiocy level of your post. I give more merit to arguments and idiocy posted by Shills and Trolls who have far more intelligence than you've just displayed.

Lets be honest SKEPTARD... the reason you didn't even attempt to show how and where my argument and explanation is wrong and you IGNORED my CHALLENGE as those like you ALWAYS DO, is because you COULDN'T.

Instead of presenting any INTELLIGENT argument or evidence to support your premise that there's nothing significant about predicting exact dates and windows that hit ALL LARGE or MAJOR 7 & 8 magnitude quakes, you EVADE, deflect, ignore facts, and sling AD- HOMS to make it look like you've proven something.

and actually you have... you've just PROVEN everything I said in my OP about PSEUDO-SKEPTICS LIKE YOURSELF

But let me get this straight...

According to your MORON-LOGIC, unless 1000's of people DIE, then not only are 7 & 8 magnitude GREAT QUAKES of NO SIGNIFICANCE, but someone that hits EXACT DATES for such quakes over and over including ALL large to major quakes with a 80-90% accuracy, is "stupid" and doing nothing of any significance either.

Re: STATISTICAL MONTHLY AVERAGE OF MAGNITUDE 7+ QUAKES EXCEEDED IN ONLY FIRST 10 DAYS OF DECEMBER?!?!? SKEPTIC CHALLENGE PART 2!

You have no idea how statistics work mate... You should actually study stat before making wild claims like this:

"And since the average for such quakes has already PEAKED for December and been met within the first 10 days of a 31 day month, the ODDS are STACKED against another 7+ occurring."

Events in the past have absolutely no influence on the likelihood of future outcomes. It's called the "gambler's fallacy," or the fallacy of maturity of chances... Otherwise the odds of flipping heads or tails would change with every given flip/sequence...

Re: STATISTICAL MONTHLY AVERAGE OF MAGNITUDE 7+ QUAKES EXCEEDED IN ONLY FIRST 10 DAYS OF DECEMBER?!?!? SKEPTIC CHALLENGE PART 2!

You have no idea how statistics work mate... You should actually study stat before making wild claims like this:

"And since the average for such quakes has already PEAKED for December and been met within the first 10 days of a 31 day month, the ODDS are STACKED against another 7+ occurring."

Events in the past have absolutely no influence on the likelihood of future outcomes. It's called the "gambler's fallacy," or the fallacy of maturity of chances... Otherwise the odds of flipping heads or tails would change with every given flip/sequence...

Quoting: Mickey Swag 11826746

PS I learned this the hard way going broke in roulette betting against sequences :)