Education

Practices

Bar Admissions

Dan Marmalefsky specializes in complex civil and criminal business litigation. His civil practice covers issues relating to securities, unfair competition, fiduciary and shareholder rights and obligations, and general business litigation. His civil cases have included matters related to the subprime banking crisis, alleged backdating of stock options, fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, inaccurate financial reporting, and deceptive sales practices in the insurance, telecommunications and food industries. Recently, he has successfully obtained judgments dismissing securities and consumer class action claims in actions filed throughout California and across the country.

Mr. Marmalefsky's criminal practice frequently overlaps with civil matters. He has simultaneously defended clients targeted by state and federal law enforcement agencies in parallel civil litigation and in regulatory proceedings before such agencies as the SEC, state insurance departments and attorneys general, and other agencies.

His criminal matters have included defending public company officers in investigations of alleged securities fraud, obtaining dismissals of criminal charges in high profile matters in New York, Washington, D.C., and Boston, Massachusetts, and representing a prominent brokerage firm in a criminal investigation arising from the Orange County bankruptcy and in subsequent California Supreme Court proceedings.

Mr. Marmalefsky is frequently retained as appellate counsel in significant civil and criminal matters. Issues he has argued in recent years include such diverse matters as whether a court erred in dismissing a juror during jury deliberations, whether a representative ERISA action for breach of fiduciary duty can be prosecuted pro se, whether California Proposition 64 should be given retroactive effect, whether the internal affairs doctrine required a California court to apply the law of the British Virgin Islands in a shareholder derivative action, and the proper scope of a criminal restitution order.

Mr. Marmalefsky regularly handles pro bono matters and has been recognized by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and California Lawyer for his ongoing commitment to pro bono representation. He has worked with the ACLU and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in criminal law cases before the United States Supreme Court, and with the ACLU in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit concerning FBI surveillance of former-Beatle John Lennon and in separate class action lawsuits concerning rights of the homeless and the right of high school students to a free public education.

Mr. Marmalefsky serves on the California Litigation Advisory Committee of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He is a member of the White Collar Crime Committee of the American Bar Association, as well as a member of California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, the Federal Bar Association, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

At Yale Law School, Mr. Marmalefsky was awarded the C. Larue Munson award for excellence in the representation of numerous individuals through Yale's Legal Services Organization.

Following graduation, Mr. Marmalefsky worked with a private, non-profit criminal defense organization in San Diego before joining Hufstedler, Miller, Carlson & Beardsley in 1982, where he became a partner in 1986. He joined Morrison & Foerster as a partner in 1995.

Mr. Marmalefsky is recommended by Legal 500 US (2014–2018), Best Lawyers in America (2013–2017), and Super Lawyers (2006–2017).

Stock Option Backdating Proceedings Involving Former CEO of High-Tech Company(S.D.N.Y.) Lead defense counsel for founder and former CEO of a high-tech company in DOJ and SEC proceedings alleging stock option backdating and improper revenue recognition. Two jury trials resulted in acquittal on six counts and hung jury on remaining count. (2006-2014)

FDIC Litigation(C.D. Cal.) Defense of former officers and directors in pending and threatened litigation by the FDIC, as receiver for various financial institutions that failed during the past few years, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, gross negligence and other misconduct. (Ongoing)

In re LJ International, Inc. Securities Litigation(C.D. Cal.) Represented LJ International, Inc., a Hong Kong-based jewelry manufacturer, and certain of its officers in a securities class action filed in the Central District of California and two related derivative actions filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles. One of the derivative actions was dismissed on defendants' motion, and the decision was upheld in the Court of Appeal. Following the Appellate Court’s decision, the other derivative action was dismissed a few months later. The securities class action was settled on favorable terms for our client. (2009)

Securities Litigation Involving Medical Device Manufacturer(C.D. Cal.) Defended a medical device manufacturer in proceedings commenced by the DOJ, SEC, and Dept. of Labor and in derivative and securities litigation commenced following public disclosure of inaccurate financial reporting. Negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ and a consent decree with the SEC, and settled private litigation on favorable terms. (2004)

United States v. Hitt249 F.3d 1010 (D.C. Cir.); 107 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C.) Lead defense in trial court, and obtained rare dismissal based on statute of limitations, on behalf of the China program director of McDonnell Douglas, who was charged with criminal conspiracy to violate export laws in connection with the shipment of aircraft machining tools to China. (2000, 2001)

Merrill Lynch Investigation(Orange County Super. Ct.) Represented Merrill Lynch in criminal investigation following Orange County bankruptcy. No charges were filed and the matter was resolved with a civil settlement. Also defended applications for unsealing of grand jury materials following the conclusion of the investigation. (1999)

Stock Option Backdating Proceedings Involving Former CEO of High-Tech Company(S.D.N.Y.) Lead defense counsel for founder and former CEO of a high-tech company in DOJ and SEC proceedings alleging stock option backdating and improper revenue recognition. Two jury trials resulted in acquittal on six counts and hung jury on remaining count. (2006-2014)

FDIC Litigation(C.D. Cal.) Defense of former officers and directors in pending and threatened litigation by the FDIC, as receiver for various financial institutions that failed during the past few years, alleging breaches of fiduciary duty, gross negligence and other misconduct. (Ongoing)

In re LJ International, Inc. Securities Litigation(C.D. Cal.) Represented LJ International, Inc., a Hong Kong-based jewelry manufacturer, and certain of its officers in a securities class action filed in the Central District of California and two related derivative actions filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles. One of the derivative actions was dismissed on defendants' motion, and the decision was upheld in the Court of Appeal. Following the Appellate Court’s decision, the other derivative action was dismissed a few months later. The securities class action was settled on favorable terms for our client. (2009)

Securities Litigation Involving Medical Device Manufacturer(C.D. Cal.) Defended a medical device manufacturer in proceedings commenced by the DOJ, SEC, and Dept. of Labor and in derivative and securities litigation commenced following public disclosure of inaccurate financial reporting. Negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with the DOJ and a consent decree with the SEC, and settled private litigation on favorable terms. (2004)

United States v. Hitt249 F.3d 1010 (D.C. Cir.); 107 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C.) Lead defense in trial court, and obtained rare dismissal based on statute of limitations, on behalf of the China program director of McDonnell Douglas, who was charged with criminal conspiracy to violate export laws in connection with the shipment of aircraft machining tools to China. (2000, 2001)

Merrill Lynch Investigation(Orange County Super. Ct.) Represented Merrill Lynch in criminal investigation following Orange County bankruptcy. No charges were filed and the matter was resolved with a civil settlement. Also defended applications for unsealing of grand jury materials following the conclusion of the investigation. (1999)

Mr. Marmalefsky is recommended by Legal 500 US (2014–2018), Best Lawyers in America (2013–2018), and Super Lawyers (2006–2018).

Email Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison & Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our Privacy Policy, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison & Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison & Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.