Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Friday, December 30, 2011

If a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they'll save the man, 'who is obligated to perform more commandments,' whereas a woman's 'wisdom is only in the spindle.' In fact, 'words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women.'

"We will direct your attention to (Talmud) Tractate Shabbat, which does a good job of summing up halakha's attitude toward women: 'a sack full of excrement with a bleeding hole."

If you would like to know the source from which your brothers derive their brazen behavior, go over to the study hall and open a page of Talmud. It's true that the Torah has 70 faces, but the trend of these faces is clear: The source of the pollution is in halakha (Jewish law) itself.

What is happening in Beit Shemesh and its satellites is not "contrary to halakha," it is mandated by halakha. And the rest will be told to the grandmothers, daughters and granddaughters.

Anyone ignoramus knows that the Torah's "ways are ways of pleasantness," that "the honor of a king's daughter is within," and that "proper behavior comes before the Torah," but it's worth knowing more. It's worth knowing that a woman is unfit to be a judge, and is also unfit to give testimony. She is unfit for any public position with authority. "Thou shalt appoint a king over thee" - a king and not a queen. A daughter, commanded the sages, must not be taught Torah, because "the mind of woman is not suited to be taught, but [only] to words of nonsense." Women are light-minded and have little knowledge.

And if a man and a woman are drowning in a river, first they'll save the man, "who is obligated to perform more commandments," whereas a woman's "wisdom is only in the spindle." In fact, "words of Torah should be burned rather than being given to women."

A man must say three blessings every day during morning prayers: He thanks God "that He didn't make me a gentile, that He didn't make me a woman, that He didn't make me an ignoramus." And it's not proper to speak to a woman too much, since "all her conversation is nothing but words of adultery," and whoever talks to her too much "causes evil to himself and will end up inheriting hell." And let's not even talk about the fate of someone "who looks even at a woman's little finger."

The extremists who spit at women, who call themselves Sikarikim, learned their lesson 101 times and learned it well: A husband would do well not to let his wife go outside, into the street, and should restrict her outings "to once or twice a month, as necessary, since a woman has no beauty except by sitting in the corner of her house." Because inside the house - very deep inside - her glorious honor awaits her: "Every woman washes her husband's face and feet and pours him a cup and prepares his bed and stands and serves her husband. And any woman who refrains from doing any of these tasks that she is obligated to perform - is forced to do them." Some recommend forcing her with a whip or by starvation "until she gives in." And needless to say, she is at her husband's disposal whenever he is overcome by a desire "to satisfy his urges with her." And if she continues to rebel, he always has the right "to divorce her without her consent."

And there are many similar halakhot, only a few of which we have collected here. Nor have we cited everything in the name of the ones who said them, for lack of space. The readers are invited to find the references on Shabbat - and to browse around - on their own; this is a good opportunity for study.

We will direct your attention to Tractate Shabbat, which does a good job of summing up halakha's attitude toward women: "a sack full of excrement" with a bleeding hole. Some people will seek to console themselves: It's true that this is the halakha both m'doraita (from the Torah ) and m'drabanan (from the rabbis ), but that is not what is taught nowadays.

But it suffices to listen to the sermon the sage Rabbi Ovadia Yosef delivered five years ago, based on the well-known halakhic work Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: "A man must take care not to walk between two women or between two dogs or two pigs, and men should also not allow a woman or a dog or a pig to walk between them."

Treating women as impure and filthy begins with halakha and continues with actions. As long as the religious and ultra-Orthodox (Israeli political) parties - Shas, United Torah Judaism, Habayit Hayehudi and National Union, none of which have any women in the Knesset - are not disqualified, their nakedness will continue to sing out and the nakedness of the land will be revealed. (End quote from Yossi Sarid).

While we have serious reservations about Rep. Paul due to his support for the system of usury and the Austrian School of Economics, we believe that he promotes this system of finance out of tragic (and abysmal) ignorance. He is, however, an honest man who distinguishes himself from the entire field of Republicans in the primary contests by the crucial fact that he is the only peace candidate and the only genuine enemy of of the privately controlled Federal Reserve banking structure which is endowed by Congress with the power to manufacture money.

The Times referenced twenty-year-old issues of Rep. Paul’s newsletters that made politically incorrect statements about Martin Luther King and compulsory integration. Together with his support for ending foreign aid and abolishing the Federal Reserve Bank -- which a Dec. 27 New York Times editorial published on the 7th day of Hanukkah described as “claptrap” — all this allegedly “disqualifies" him as a trustworthy candidate for President of the United States:

"Ron Paul long ago disqualified himself for the presidency by peddling claptrap proposals like abolishing the Federal Reserve, returning to the gold standard, cutting a third of the federal budget and all foreign aid and opposing the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Now, making things worse, he has failed to convincingly repudiate racist remarks that were published under his name for years — or the enthusiastic support he is getting from racist groups. Mr. Paul, a Republican congressman from Texas who is doing particularly well in Iowa's precaucus polls, published several newsletters in the '80s and '90s with names like the Ron Paul Survival Report and the Ron Paul Political Report. The newsletters interspersed libertarian political and investment commentary with racial bigotry, anti-Semitism and far-right paranoia....Mr. Paul, who, beginning in 2008, has disavowed the articles and their ideas, now says that most of them were written by others and that he was unaware of their content. Even if that were the case, it suggests a stupendous level of negligence that should force a reconsideration by anyone considering entrusting him with the White House."

Peace is not a qualifying factor for the New York Times. The newspaper does not detract legitimacy from the presidential aspirations of Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann, Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney because if elected president, each of these candidates would burn and bomb Iran with American warplanes as soon as a pretext to do so would present itself. The spectacle of thousands of Iranian civilian corpses does not trouble the liberals at the Times. What infuriates them is the possibility that the Israeli capacity to make war on Iran, Palestine and Lebanon would be seriously curtailed by a Paul presidency.

_________________________________________

"How can rhetoric critiquing a Martin Luther King federal holiday compare on the scale of human atrocity with turning an Iranian nation of 50 million people into a smoking cinder at the behest of the Israeli Lobby?"

_________________________________________

Despite Zoharic theatre in which a Times columnist recently denigrated Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Netanyahu's staff in turn denounced the Times, the paper is one of the most Talmudic on the planet, its facade of liberal humanism not withstanding. Judaic victimhood trumps the travail of all other people in its pages. The memory of thousands of Palestinians and Lebanese killed in the first decade of the 21st century by Israeli forces long ago faded from the pages of the Times, while on the 8th day of Hanukkah the Times published a prominent Op Ed about “saving Jews,” which is ever their primary focus. The Talmudic religion teaches that Judaics have higher souls than gentiles; that pernicious dogma filtered into the Times decades ago and has been a mainstay ever since, as it is in most of the American media.

Many of the other Republican candidates have ties to extremist rabbis. Bachmann receives advice at the feet of a Kabbalist rabbi. Santorum, while U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania, regularly conferred with and pledged his support to Hasidic rabbis who have an exceedingly low estimation of Arabs and gentiles in general. The New York Times couldn’t care less.

The “claptrap” drumbeat for war with Iran, led by homicidal rabbis and their clean-shaven Zionist fellow-travelers, does not trouble the august New York Times even one-tenth as much as some marginal characters from the South supporting Ron Paul’s campaign. The equivalence does not even bear comparison. When has Ron Paul ever supported racist legislation in his decades of service in Congress? He has not done so. How can rhetoric critiquing a Martin Luther King federal holiday compare on the scale of human atrocity with turning an Iranian nation of 50 million people into a smoking cinder at the behest of the Israeli Lobby?

What riles the New York Times is Ron Paul’s peace advocacy at a time when the media are gearing an exhausted American populace and a drained U.S. treasury for another adventure in messianic invasion and therapeutic war according to Rabbi Moses Maimonides’ principles, even as the neocon intervention into the thousand-year-old Shiite/Sunni civil war in Iraq is proving to be the most egregious waste of American blood and treasure since Vietnam.

Media smears directed against the only peace candidate in the field of Republican presidential aspirants is one of the oldest tools in American politics for destroying the chances of a leader who the American people would actually overwhelmingly support if they were given a fair and accurate representation of his views. Instead, the Times casts Ron Paul in a white sheet while their anointed candidates walk about in the bloody robes of perpetual war for Talmudic ends.

Michael Hoffman is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods, published in November by Independent History and Research.

Tuesday, December 06, 2011

This is a series of lectures based on ongoing research being gathered for Michael Hoffman's proposed book, "Usury: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now Is Not." In these audio CDs, Hoffman challenges the conventional history of the revolutionary permission for usury, documenting a pre-Protestant, Catholic source for this permission. In addition, he offers evidence of widespread, early Puritan resistance to usury.

This 2.5 hour lecture series on 3 CDs counters the widespread ignorance of the history of early Protestant resistance to usury and exposes the propaganda which assigns the blame for usury to John Calvin, rather than the philosophers and theologians backed by the Fugger banking dynasty and indoctrinated by the liberal Tübingen school of Catholic philosophers.

We cannot successfully contest the Wall Street/Federal Reserve system without accurate knowledge of the 1500-year history of the Christian campaign against indebtedness, social injustice and plutocracy. This history is mostly unknown today.

Many contemporary conservative Christians imagine that the Church was a sort of early branch of laissez-faire capitalism, and that it was the Protestant Reformation which was responsible for the revolutionary overthrow of the Christian ban on interest on loans. None of this is true.

Setting the historical record straight by telling the suppressed story of the Catholic and Protestant churchmen who vigorously fought usury, as well as the modernizing Judases who supported it, gives us the clarity of vision necessary in our time to successfully fight the dragon that is the Money Power. Note: these talks are study lectures, not entertainment.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

The Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Bishop Bernard Fellay, has given an 'interview' in his familiar style intended to dispel suspicions raised by his secretive negotiations with the suspicious characters in Rome where "there is no lack of indiscretions!" The 'interview' doesn't accomplish its goal.

The 'interview' is largely unremarkable: reassuring words, summary deflection of justified suspicion and criticism, summary dismissal of internet channels not under Fellay control, redirection of focus back onto an apparition claimed by 3 children in Portugal 100 years ago, reemploying the busywork of tens of millions of rosaries -- all very familiar and predictable. The 'interview' can be read here:

One item mentioned in the 'interview' is very relevant to us here. I quote: "... leeway has been allowed for a 'legitimate discussion' about certain points of the [Second Vatican] Council."

Note that the Novus Ordo Church allows 'discussion' of its own teaching. In this context, 'discussion' concerns doubts and outright denials. The SSPX denies that certain points contained within the authoritative documents of the Novus Ordo Church's Second Vatican Council can be reconciled with the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church. The Novus Ordo has allowed the SSPX to present its case to this effect in doctrinal 'dialogues' over the past two years. The Novus Ordo is now negotiating an arrangement to bring the SSPX into 'full communion' while allowing discussion of doubts of its own authoritative teachings.

This was also stated in a February 2009 statement from the Pope's Secretary of State: "... the Holy See will not fail, in ways judged opportune, to engage with the interested parties in examining outstanding questions, so as to attain a full and satisfactory resolution of the problems that caused this painful rupture."

Note, however, that this typically lenient allowance pertaining to the Novus Ordo's own teachings is immediately followed by a mandate in absolute terms virtually unseen in Rome in the past 100 years:

"The positions of Bishop Williamson with regard to the Shoah are absolutely unacceptable and firmly rejected by the Holy Father ... In order to be admitted to function as a Bishop within the Church, Bishop Williamson must also distance himself in an absolutely unequivocal and public way from his positions regarding the Shoah ..."

Nota bene, it is not demanded that SSPX Bishop Richard Williamsonabsolutely and unequivocally publicly distance himself from his doubts regarding relativistic Novus Ordo teaching on religious liberty, collegiality, ecumenism. These "outstanding questions" are open to "examination." No such questions or examination can be countenanced in the absolutist realm of "The Holocaust," however. Here we see the resurrection of the old ipse dixit and anathema that are otherwise entirely unheard of from Catholic prelates for nearly 100 years.

This is remarkable, is it not? In light of this, perhaps readers may understand where Rabbi Berenbaum is coming from when he says: “As I observe young people in relativistic societies seeking an absolute for morals and values, they now can view the Holocaust as the transcendental move away from the relativistic, and up into the absolute ..." (Source: Speech by Rabbi Berenbaum, Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust, January 26-28, 2000).

How opportune for Rabbi Berenbaum and "The Holocaust" that the authorities of the Catholic Church hold "The Holocaust" to be absolute while Church teachings are ever increasingly relativised away.

Bishop Fellay certainly knows how to go with the relativist/absolutist flow of the Noahide Novus Ordo. Soon after the February 2009 statement from the Pope's Secretary of State was issued, Bp. Fellay was interviewed in the German magazine Der Speigel saying that he would cast Bp. Williamson out of the SSPX if he "denied" "The Holocaust" again:

There may be space between the SSPX Superior and the Novus Ordo on religious liberty and a number of other matters, but not where "The Holocaust" is concerned, which Rabbi Ignaz Maybaum said "replaced Golgotha":

"The Golgotha of modern mankind is Auschwitz. The cross, the Roman gallows, was replaced by the gas chambers...In Auschwitz, the Jewish people was the High Priest and the sacrificial lamb in one." - Rabbi Ignaz Maybaum, The Face of God After Auschwitz (1965), pp. 36 and 71.

To receive “On the Contrary" by e-mail, send an e-mail to hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org with the subject: Subscribe Hoffman Wire. You will receive an invitation by return e-mail to which you must reply.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Michael Hoffman's Note: The reader may be asking, why publish a review for an out-of-print book? The fourth edition of Judaism Discovered was never printed because we did not raise the approximately $18,000 necessary to print and ship to Idaho a massive, textbook-size hardcover of 1100 pages in the minimum quantity (1,000 books) required by the printer in order to qualify for a decent discount; moreover, just to truck 1,000 copies of Judaism Discovered, which weighs 4.5 pounds per copy, from the plant back east, would cost nearly $2,000. The book is officially out of print, true. However, a few single copies are still available from us directly. Judaism Discovered is out of print in terms of quantity copies at a reasonably low price. We can't sell you five copies at a wholesale discount. (If you purchase electronic e-books, Amazon offers Judaism Discovered on its Kindle device). We have condensed Judaism Discovered's 1100 pages into an affordable paperback of 381 pages, Judaism's Strange Gods, which also contains new material.

The author of this book, Michael A. Hoffman II, is one of my favorite writers. He has written several other books including: Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, The Great Holocaust Trial (about Ernst Zündel), and Judaism's Strange Gods. He has also written numerous tracts on Freemasonry, and other occult topics. I consider him an expert in these areas. I don't know how to characterize him or his work. It seems like he's a Christian scholar, revisionist historian, and occult expert, all rolled into one! But I'll bet he doesn't like to labeled, so I'll just call him a truth seeker, like myself.

This book is over 1000 pages with nearly 1200 footnotes. He uses quotes from famous Rabbis to make his case, which is, that Judaism is not the Old Testament religion that many believe. It's a mishmash of various pagan superstitions that go back to Babylonian times. It is a religion of racial self-worship. The purpose of this "religion" is to replace Calvary with a lie known as Auschwitz. It must have taken many years to put this book together and it is an astounding achievement. He is very thorough and uses quotes from many older little known texts.

The Talmud

I used to think that the most important book of the Rabbis was the Old Testament. Some would call the Jews, the "People of The Book". This is not true. The Talmud is the book to be studied, along with the Cabala, by orthodox Jews. The Old Testament is relegated to minor status. Why? Well, the Rabbis worship themselves, not Yahweh, the God of the Old Testament. The Pharisees, who were the early Rabbis, murdered the prophets as Jesus told us. The Talmud tells us that the prophet Isaiah was sawn in half! In the Talmud it is said that a Rabbi won a debate with God! The Judaic people are God! Only Jews are human. Gentiles are animals.

The Talmud consists of two parts, the Mishnah and the Gemara. The Mishnah is the codified "Oral Law" passed on by the Pharisees, who were the early Rabbis. With this "Oral Law", the Rabbis can make up anything they want. The Gemara is commentary on the Mishnah.

The Talmud is a book (many volumes) of rules which orthodox Jews should follow. It is full of all kinds of arcane rules which will drive one insane. Like, meat and dairy products should be kept in separate refrigerators. There are toilet rules, and rules with dealing with menstruating women (they should be shunned) and so on.

The Cabala

The Cabala is a book on witchcraft. It is used for cursing people and invoking demons. According to Hoffman, it contains some seventy volumes. I realize that many people will have a problem with that.

The Rabbis routinely curse Christian graves, churches, and the Cross. Orthodox Jews spit on Christians. They won't deny this. But we are not privy to the witchcraft that the Rabbis practice behind closed doors. But thanks to God, they let things slip out. Yitzhak Rabin was cursed by a Rabbi and was dead in a month. That was for signing the Oslo peace agreement. The Rabbis curse countries too.

Treatment of Gentiles

The Talmud clearly states, that gentiles caught reading it should be killed. That has got to be a shocker! When it comes to the Gospels, don't they say, "Spread the good word."? But the hate directed toward gentiles and Christians in particular, permeates this work. It is repeatedly stated that, it is OK to steal from gentiles, as long as Jews are not harmed by doing so. If a gentile strikes a Jew, he deserves death. The gentiles are inferior (a different species) and are not to be treated as equals. Having sex (including rape and sodomy) with children is OK according to the Talmud. Although, it is unclear whether this includes Jewish children. The famous Rabbi, Maimonides, said that Christians should be killed (or not treated by Jewish doctors) when Jews are dominant, and that the Christians are idol worshippers. One Rabbi said that, "Even the best of gentiles should be killed".

Treatment of Jews

Women should sit in the back of the bus, according to orthodox Jews. The Rabbis hate their own people and use them for their own ends. The Rabbis encouraged segregation (ghettos) so that they could control their Jews.

Paganism

In the book, there is a picture of an orthodox Jew holding a chicken over his head, in a ceremony to transfer sins to the chicken! There is also info on the propitiation of the moon goddess Shekhinah (remember Shock and Awe). Rabbis sell lucky amulets to ward off evil. Like, perhaps, the demons that they summon on occasion! They take astrology and Gematria (number/letter combinations important) very seriously.

The Sacred Six Million Number

No, no, no. Not that six million number! The other six million number! Didn't you know? Six million Jews were threatened by Germany during and after World War One! I had a problem with that number ever since I learned about it in high school. Too precise. I mean, if the numbers of the dead were really known, precisely, wouldn't the number be more like five million eight hundred thousand, or six million one hundred thousand? Why six million?

That number has Cabalistic significance. It is ten times six hundred thousand. Six hundred thousand is the number of letters in the Torah (supposedly). That's where the Rabbis got the number (my opinion). The six million number is surely an exaggeration, as many researchers say. But exaggeration is OK, according to the Talmud. For example, didn't Hadrian slaughter 800,000,000 Jews? It's in Talmud! The Holocaust should be debated. But it is not, because the Rabbis would lose. The authorities have reduced the number of dead (mostly Jews supposedly) at Auschwitz by several millions. The current figure is about 1.5 million. But where are the bodies?

Jesus

It is said in the Talmud that Jesus deserved what he got. There was no resurrection. He is burning in Hell in boiling hot feces. The Talmud mocks Jesus and the hatred of Him is incessant. Those who read the Gospels go to hell. Mary was promiscuous and Jesus was a bastard. The New Testament was burned recently in Israel.

Rules for Lying

The Talmud has many rules for lying. God rewards clever liars. The overriding rule is, don't get caught lying.

The Kosher Tax

This is a racket. I can buy Kosher aluminum foil from my grocery store. The Kosher symbol has nothing to do with quality. Even junk food is sometimes kosher. Why should we pay this tax? The Rabbis are probably cursing the food for Gentiles at the same time that they bless it for their fellow Jews.

Noahide Laws

Now this is cause for concern. These laws are for Gentiles. There are seven of them. One of the Noahide Laws says that Idolatry is to be punished by death. Does that mean that those possessing a Christian Cross should be killed? The Rabbis made up the Noahide Laws. They have nothing to do with Noah. One of those laws says that homosexuals should be killed. Perhaps someone should tell the homosexual lobby this bit of info. As far as I know, the homosexual lobby is allied with the Jewish lobby to fight hate. Aren't the Noahide laws hate?

Owen's comments on Hoffman's book

Wow! Buy this book. It is one of the best books I have ever read. I started taking notes from the beginning, and ended up with nearly thirty pages! This review is the most important thing that I have ever written. Hope it gets out there, to make a difference.

Hoffman seems to be one of the few out there in this fight against the Talmudists. Why? The Talmud is full of filth and hate. Why aren't more people talking about it? The mainstream media pretends that Muslims are the problem, not the Rabbis. The laws of our land are slowly being Talmudized.

It's OK to lie to, swear false oaths to (see Kol Nidre), cheat from, and steal from Gentiles. This is clear and spelled out at length in the Talmud. Now the reader can understand why a bunch of Jewish banksters on Wall Street have no problem with looting the USA. Leo Strauss, an orthodox Jew spoke of the "noble lie". Like for example, the Holocaust? A student of his (Wolfowitz) lied to get the US into a war in Iraq. What happens when we believe these lies or don't challenge these liars? Well, do we end up like the US? Everyone reading this must think that something has gone horribly wrong with America. But, the same thing is happening in Canada and Europe. Jesus said that Satan was the father of lies.

Murdering Gentiles is acceptable too. One can now understand how an IDF soldier, or perhaps a settler, can shoot an unarmed Palestinian child and "harvest" their organs to sell on the black market. We know that these things happen. A Rabbi was caught in New Jersey with organs. The Palestinians are considered sub-humans.

I wonder about the obsession with filth in the Talmud. Perhaps this can partly explain the "potty humor" of Jewish "so-called" comedians, like the filthy Larry David who urinated on a picture of Jesus recently on TV. Or, how about the sickening Joan Rivers. After all of these decades she is still around making with the potty humor. She was never funny decades ago and she's not funny now. I don't suppose that Mel Gibson thought she was funny when she said that he should be killed for making anti-semitic comments.

Now we have the trashy Sarah Silverman (heir-apparent to Rivers?). How long are we going to have to put up with her? She was on video making some disparaging remarks about Jesus while pretending to wipe her bottom. Hilarious!! As I write this, there is a pic of her on the net with her pants down sitting on a toilet.

Hoffman says that the Rabbis encourage segregation. Or used to. I have heard this before. In all of my net reading, some things are hard to forget. I remember reading a Yiddish proverb. It went something like this, "Our own Jews are going to destroy us". I did not understand this at the time. But I do now. The Rabbis hate the ordinary rank and file Jew.

I thought that I would mention one more thing. The Rabbis are obsessed with numbers and symbols. This goes back to Pythagoras. Today, his theorem is revered by Freemasons.

Pythagoras and his followers believed that numbers guide the universe. He found out how to construct a five-pointed star using a compass and straight edge. The pagans and the Rabbis attach great importance to this symbol. We now see five pointed stars on the flags of many countries.

After reading this far, the reader must agree, that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. Judaism is the antithesis of Christianity. The Old Testament belongs to Christians, not Jews. The God given laws of Moses have been negated by Judaism. And what about Christian-Zionists? Perhaps they have been brainwashed by the Scofield bible. I hope that the reader will send some of these people a link to this review.

And that leads me to this. I agree with Hoffman, that Judaism is a religion based on deceit. To his credit, it is an ideology which he fights, not a racial group. The Talmud is a book full of extreme hate and filth. However I wouldn't ban it. I just think that we should discuss it.

Thank you Mr. Hoffman. You are very courageous.

Please Note: Hoffman has recently published, Judaism's Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded, which is essentially, a shorter version of the book reviewed here.

To receive these On the Contrary columns by e-mail: send an e-mail to hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org with the subject: Subscribe Hoffman Wire. You will receive an invitation by return e-mail to which you must reply.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Rabbi Boteach and Reverend Sharpton: A Trip Down New York's Memory Lane

By THE NATION OF ISLAM RESEARCH GROUP

Nation of Islam Report v. 2 no. 45, November 18, 2011

"Blacks must comply with incessant Jewish demands for apologies, and the Jews maintain a deliberate amnesia of their own 'dishonorable and incendiary' racist past."

In his recent commentary titled "Time for the Jewish Community to End the Sharpton Wars," the self-proclaimed "America's Rabbi" Shmuley Boteach of New York calls his friend the Reverend Al Sharpton "dishonorable and incendiary," an anti-Semitic "rabble-rouser," and even charges him with collaborating with "terrorists."

The Reverend Sharpton has travelled to “Israel” with Rabbi Boteach, broken bread with him at a kosher restaurant, and interceded at his request with Governor Patterson to try to obtain a pardon for a Jewish murderer. As the rabbi himself might say, "This, you call friendship?"

But that is indeed what passes today as the "Black–Jewish" relationship. Blacks must comply with incessant Jewish demands for apologies, and the Jews maintain a deliberate amnesia of their own "dishonorable and incendiary" racist past.

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan accurately characterized the dysfunctional relationship that Rabbi Boteach remembers so fondly: "Whenever the Light of Truth has been shone on them, they reach for you [Black leaders] to defend them against the Truth that uncovers the horror that has been done to us. They have always been successful pitting us against each other thus keeping them from facing the Truth of their real relationship with us.”

Top: Rev. Al Sharpton

Bottom: Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

And this is precisely what Rabbi Boteach is now trying to do with the Reverend Al Sharpton. The substance of Boteach's poisonous appeal is to urge his Jewish brethren to give Sharpton a mulligan— a pardon, or a do-over—for all his "anti-Semitic history."

After all, concludes the rabbi, he's not like "Louis Farrakhan."

...Boteach and Sharpton are both from New York, where that cherished and fabled Black–Jewish relationship started—not in the civil rights movement of the 1900s—but way back before Rabbi Boteach would care to remember, back in the 17th century.

Like all European settlements after Christopher Columbus, New Yorkers were desperate for free labor and so, predictably, they turned to the African, the greatest builder in world history. But first, they turned to Rabbi Boteach's people, the Jews. Early New Yorkers knew that if they wanted Black Africans, they must consult the Jewish merchants of Brazil, who had monopolized the slave trade for all of the western hemisphere. According to their own words, they needed to contact the "Jobbers and Jews," who were known to "buy up the slaves for cash" and sell them on credit.

Through these Jewish slave merchants New Yorkers hoped to "be adequately supplied with laborers," and that the slave trade "might be again revived." It was 1655 when enslaved Africans started arriving in New York in great numbers, and not coincidentally, that was just one year after Jews first settled in New York; and these Jews just happened to be from Brazil!

The most important Jewish American historian Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael went further in his "incendiary" language than Rev. Sharpton ever did when he wrote that Jews "frequently dominated" the slave trade. He said that in Brazil "Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday," and throughout the Caribbean "Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade."

So, Rabbi Boteach, this is why early New Yorkers needed a relationship with the "Chosen People."

In 1717 and 1721, two slave ships owned by Jewish merchant Nathan Simson sailed into the New York harbor with a total of 217 enslaved Africans. Another Jewish historian confirmed that the shipments were "two of the largest slave cargoes to be brought into New York in the first half of the eighteenth century."

So it may have been by Rabbi Boteach's ancestors that many Blacks, perhaps even Sharpton's ancestors, came to New York as slave laborers. By 1743, according to New York tax records, of 422 Jews listed, 2 had seven slaves, 5 had six slaves, 14 had four slaves, 21 had three slaves, 54 had two slaves, 282 had one slave, and only 39 reported none—but they probably hired slaves from the others. There are several advertisements reprinted in the book Jews Selling Blacks showing New York Jews actually seeking the return of their runaway slaves!

Twenty years ago near Manhattan's Foley Square, 415 graves were uncovered with as many as 20,000 of these forgotten, abused Black human beings. Stacked five deep, their decayed bones told a chilling tale of violent oppression, starvation deaths, chronic infections and unspeakable suffering. Muscles had been ripped from bone, necks had been broken and spines jammed into skulls—all injuries from lives cursed with carrying heavy loads. If they had not perished in infancy, they had lived just long enough to be worked to death. How many of these 20,000 were enslaved by these 422 Jewish people, we may never know.

Lehman Brothers

Go a few blocks to Wall Street, which became the financial center of the world through slave dealing and cotton trading. The Lehman Brothers had grandiose offices at that prestigious address, but before that they could be found with many, many other Jewish firms in the cotton plantations of Alabama when slavery was at its peak. They gave loans to white plantation masters to buy Black slaves and expand their slavery operations. Then at harvest time they took the cotton bales to sell on the world markets. One of the Lehman Brothers was actually in charge of all cotton production in the state! Think about that, Rabbi Boteach. That would be like Motown Records or Ebony Magazine setting up in Nazi Germany and using Jewish concentration camp inmates for labor.

And when the Lehmans made all that cotton money in Alabama, they then moved to Wall Street, where a market had been established in 1711 to be a "place where Negroes and Indians could be bought, sold, or hired."

We now know, through the research in The Secret Relationship, that the Jewish cotton/slavery merchants in the American South had cornered the cotton trade. They laundered this dirty slavery lucre in New York banks, which then financed the expansion of the infamous New York "Needle Trades"—the ubiquitous Jewish-owned sweatshops where women and children turned that cotton into even more profitable clothing for the world market. This is how Rabbi Boteach's people used the Rev. Sharpton's people to build their mighty financial infrastructure, making themselves the "Giants in the Land" the Bible speaks of in Numbers 13:33.

Rabbi Boteach's rabbinical predecessor, Morris Jacob Raphall, delivered a sermon to his delighted Jewish congregation in which he authoritatively asserted that the slave trade and African slavery were perfectly moral and indeed ordered by God! It was the most publicized sermon ever delivered by an American Jew up to that time. "The negro," he taught, has inferior intellectual powers, and "no man of his race has ever inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral."

The slave-owning Southern Confederates couldn't have been happier! They printed and reprinted this divine ruling from the New York-based leader of the "Chosen People." His New York Jewish congregation did not repudiate and denounce him for this "dishonorable and incendiary" speech—as they do to Rev. Sharpton—they made him the highest-paid clergyman in America!

Rabbi Boteach has never repudiated this hateful Talmudic nonsense, though he continually reminds his readers of all the "crimes" Sharpton has committed against the Jews. And though these alleged crimes are entirely in the form of spoken words they say emerged from the Reverend's mouth, the real Black–Jewish relationship goes way back and covers not only Jewish words of pure anti-Black hatred, but incredibly wicked Jewish deeds as well—including robbery, enslavement, and murder.

"Rabbi Boteach has never repudiated this hateful Talmudic nonsense,
though he continually reminds his readers of all the 'crimes' Sharpton
has committed against the Jews."

Rabbi Boteach is part of the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement in New York City. They adhere to the Talmud, which teaches that Jesus—the Christ—is now in hell boiling in excrement for his crimes against Jews. Further, the Chabad school system in Israel refuses to admit Ethiopian Jews because of their skin color.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach and some of his two million fellow Jewish New Yorkers, including standouts like the ADL's Abraham Foxman and former mayor Ed Koch, have made careers of punishing Rev. Sharpton, who has done nothing but stand up for the rights of his people. They obscure the fact that they are all still benefitting from the financial foundation that their ancestors' deeds laid for them (the list of public and private enterprises supported by the Lehman Brothers is astounding).

New York Jews were heavily involved in every aspect of this unforgivable behavior, often as leaders. They gave aid and comfort to our enemies, and have proved themselves—by their own historical record— to be our most consistent enemies of all the Caucasians.

Before the "never-forgetting" New York rabbi admonishes our brother and friend Rev. Sharpton, maybe he ought to first "never forget" the role his people played in creating the dire conditions that our people suffer—to this very moment.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

RACHEL ABRAMS wrote that Palestinians are "animals" and their children "devils' spawn." Mrs. Abrams' hatred was endorsed by the Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin ("Rubin said that she admires Abrams, has quoted her a lot, thinks she's an excellent writer and endorsed the sentiment behind the Abrams blog post").

Big Media, like the New York Times, have suppressed all reporting of this volcanic Talmudic hate by a prominent Zionist who is the wife of Elliott Abrams. Racist statements by Zionists and Khazars are protected from sustained reporting and editorial outrage.

The Talmud decrees that gentiles are lesser beings that do not possess the Neshamah HaElyonah which superior Judaics possess. Therefore, hate-speech directed against Palestinians and their children does not register in the western media the way it would if it were directed at fully human beings.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

...Israel's so-called Prevention of Infiltration Law. Originally promulgated in 1954 to curb Palestinians seeking to return to their homes...is a law that the government now wants to modify to enable three-year detentions without trial for illegal migrants entering from Africa via Egypt's Sinai Peninsula.

...Concerned about maintaining a Jewish majority, Israel has looked askance at allowing "return" rights to Palestinians. There is a broad worry in Israel that too many non-Jewish residents will erode the society's ethnic core.

...Across Israel more than 40,000 Africans bear identity cards that designate them as under "Conditional Release" - a form of house arrest that prohibits the designee from working. The designation frees the government from housing and feeding the illegal immigrants while stopping short of granting them asylum-seeker status. Tesfamariam Tekeste, Eritrea's ambassador to Israel, considers the "conditional" arrangement a travesty. The ban against working exposes Eritrean laborers to exploitation by unscrupulous employers, while poverty forces Africans to sleep in city parks or rent hovels from slumlords...

Today, the emergence of African districts in cities including Eilat, Ashdod and Tel Aviv is alarming to many. "Look at Tel Aviv," says Ya'akov Katz, of the religious National Union party, who complains that the city is already experiencing a variant of "white flight" from some districts. Within five years, he warns, "Tel Aviv is going to be an African city."

Mr. Katz approves of the new legislation, which envisions more money to complete a security fence along Israel's border with Sinai, and new funds to complete a detention city where "infiltrators" can be held for up to three years without trial." (End quote)

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Editor's Note: The insouciance with which the New York Times celebrates the life of the late atomic physicist Norman Ramsey, who died Nov. 4, is breathtaking. Accompanying their obituary (below), The Times published a photo of Ramsey signing the atomic bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki and killed tens of thousands of civilians, as if he were signing a birthday card. If Dr. Ramsey had been photographed signing the door of the alleged gas chamber at Auschwitz, the New York Times would have condemned him as a monster, but their laudatory obituary is oblivious to the horrors perpetrated at Nagasaki by war criminals like Ramsey, including Japanese children with acute radiation burns. This depraved indifference emanates from blind faith in the Allied dogma of The Good War, and the Talmudic mentality of Judaic-victim exceptionalism.

Norman Ramsey Dies at 96; Work Led to the Atomic Clock

By Jascha Hoffman

New York Times, November 7, 2011, page A19

Norman F. Ramsey in 1989

Ramsey signing the atomic bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan in 1945.

Norman F. Ramsey, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist who developed a precise method to probe the structure of atoms and molecules and used it to devise a remarkably exact way to keep time, died on Friday in Wayland, Mass. He was 96. His death was confirmed by his wife, Ellie. In 1949, Dr. Ramsey invented an experimental technique to measure the frequencies of electromagnetic radiation most readily absorbed by atoms and molecules. The technique allowed scientists to investigate their structure with greater accuracy and enabled the development of a new kind of timekeeping device known as the atomic clock. Dr. Ramsey received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1989 for both achievements.

“If you made a list of the most outstanding physicists of the 20th century, he’d be among the leaders,” said Leon M. Lederman, emeritus director of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., which Dr. Ramsey helped found.

Early in the 20th century, physicists began to decipher the structure of atoms from measurements of the wavelengths of light they released and absorbed, a method called atomic spectroscopy. In 1937, the physicist Isidor Isaac Rabi of Columbia University developed a means of studying atoms and molecules by sending a stream of them through rapidly alternating magnetic fields. As Dr. Rabi’s student at Columbia in the late 1930s, Dr. Ramsey worked to refine it.

In 1949, when he was at Harvard, Dr. Ramsey discovered a way to improve the technique’s accuracy: exposing the atoms and molecules to the magnetic fields only briefly as they entered and left the apparatus. His new approach — which Dr. Ramsey called the separated oscillatory fields method, but which is often simply referred to as the Ramsey method — is widely used today. Dr. Ramsey’s research helped lay the groundwork for nuclear magnetic resonance, whose applications include the M.R.I. technique now widely used for medical diagnosis. (Do his MRIs help diagnose elderly Japanese with radiation sickness from Nagasaki? -Michael Hoffman)

But the most immediate application of the Ramsey method has been in the development of highly accurate atomic clocks. Since 1967 it has been used to define the exact span of a second, not as a fraction of the time it takes Earth to revolve around the Sun, but as 9,192,631,770 radiation cycles of a cesium atom. In 1960, working with his student Daniel Kleppner, now an emeritus professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr. Ramsey invented a different type of atomic clock, known as the hydrogen maser, whose remarkable stability has since been used to confirm the minute effects of gravity on time as predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Atomic clocks like the hydrogen maser are also used in the ground-based timing systems that track global positioning satellites. Dr. Ramsey did not anticipate that his laboratory technique would have such applications. “I didn’t even know there was a problem about clocks initially,” he said in a 1995 oral history interview. “My wristwatch was pretty good.”

Norman Foster Ramsey Jr. was born on Aug. 27, 1915, in Washington, the son of Minna Bauer Ramsey, a mathematics teacher, and Norman Foster Ramsey, an Army officer. After receiving his Ph.D. under Dr. Rabi at Columbia, he worked at the M.I.T. Radiation Laboratory and served as a radar consultant to the secretary of war.

In 1943 he went to Los Alamos, N.M., to work on the Manhattan Project, leading a team that helped assemble the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan (the Times has no other comment on his role in the atomic holocaust - Michael Hoffman).

After the war, he taught for nearly four decades at Harvard, mentoring scores of graduate students, many of whom went on to start their own research groups. Although he officially retired in 1986, he continued his work through his early 90s. In recent years, he collaborated with a team of British physicists to study the symmetry of the neutron, searching for evidence that it was not perfectly spherical. Dr. Ramsey presided over the founding of Fermilab and another major particle accelerator laboratory, the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, where he was the first head of the physics department in the 1940s. As the first science adviser to NATO, he initiated summer school programs to train European scientists. He led a National Research Council committee that concluded in 1982 that contrary to the findings of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, acoustical evidence did not support the existence of a second gunman in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Dr. Ramsey had an athletic flair. He learned to ski in Norway in the 1930s. Later, he took up long-board surfing and ice sailing, and he traveled with his second wife, Ellie Welch Ramsey, from the Himalayas to Antarctica. After having a knee replaced in the 1980s, he continued to ski. Dr. Ramsey’s first wife, Elinor, died in 1983. In addition to his wife, he is survived by four daughters, Margaret Kasschau, Patricia Ramsey, Winifred Swarr and Janet Farrell; two stepchildren, Marguerite and Gerard Welch; eight grandchildren; and nine great-grandchildren.

Colleagues said Dr. Ramsey was a tall man with bright white hair who gestured energetically and walked briskly. “He had a messianic quality when talking about his work,” said Gerald Gabrielse, a physics professor at Harvard. William Phillips, a physicist at the University of Maryland, said Dr. Ramsey’s forceful presence and as his contributions “set the tone for a generation of physicists.”

Thursday, November 03, 2011

"Non-economic liberalism" was a philosophy developed by the longtime white Jewish president of the NAACP, Joel Spingarn, for Black people's social and political advancement without economic empowerment."It took fifty years of pressure at close quarters from these so-called Jews to finally tame Du Bois and make him change 'Jew' to 'foreigner' and 'immigrant'." in the 1952 edition of his book, thus concealing the Jewish presence in the post-slavery Southern economy."By Dr. Ridgely A. Mu'min MuhammadNation of Islam Research GroupVol. 2, Issue 43, 2011Finalcall.com

Joel Spingarn

"Non-economic liberalism" was the philosophy guiding the activities of the early NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), which sought the social acceptance of Blacks instead of building our own business economy. The Honorable Elijah Muhammad warned Black people that Whites would never teach us "the science of business," so "non-economic liberalism" was a philosophy developed by the longtime white Jewish president of the NAACP, Joel Spingarn, for Black people's social and political advancement without economic empowerment.This philosophy was in direct contrast to the economic and political empowerment goals of the Niagara Movement, which was supplanted by the historians write about the NAACP , they make you think that it was the direct outgrowth of the Niagara Movement, which was secretly started by 29 Black men, who stated in their 1905 Declaration of Principles that they "especially complain against the denial of equal opportunities to us in economic life; in the rural districts of the South this amounts to peonage and virtual slavery; all over the South it tends to crush labor and small business enterprises..." These Black men demonstrated that Black people in the South strove toward The Honorable Elijah Muhammad's brand of economic independence. In fact, by 1910 Black people had acquired over 16 million acres of land, mostly in the South, but Black landownership steadily declined after the advent of the NAACP, as this organization made the northern cities safer for Black people, thus facilitating the Great Migration(s) out of the South.When W.E.B. Du Bois brought a white woman, Mary White Ovington, into the Niagara Movement, founding members like William Monroe Trotter broke away and set up the all-Black National Equal Rights League (NERL). Now this William Trotter was a brother who had received a bachelor's degree in international banking from Harvard University, graduating Magna Cum Laude in 1895, and went on to earn his Masters from Harvard in 1896. However, he could never get a career started in the banking industry .Now, this same white woman, Mary White Ovington, a New York City news reporter, tracked Du Bois down in 1906, and later introduced him to 300 other white "liberals" in New York City ,who then founded the NAACP in 1910. Du Bois was the only member of the original 29 founders of the Niagara Movement to join the white-dominated NAACP. These early white leaders of the NAACP included wealthy Jewish merchants, rabbis, economists, scholars and journalists and others, such as Jacob Schiff, Julius Rosenwald, Joel Spingarn, Rabbi Stephen Wise, all of whom hypocritically pushed "non-economic liberalism.”

Jacob Schiff

For instance, one of these Jewish board members of the NAACP, Jacob Schiff, was a senior partner in the Wall Street banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Company. Schiff also became the director of many other important corporations, including the National City Bank of New York, Equitable Life Assurance Society, Wells Fargo & Company, and the Union Pacific Railroad.He could have hired and mentored William Monroe Trotter, who had two degrees in international banking from Harvard, but, instead, Schiff watched over the shoulder of Du Bois as he edited the Crisis Magazine. Schiff decided not to help the man who could have led Black people to economic independence and power, but decided instead to shepherd another Black man toward being the most eloquent complainer about Black people's condition.W.E.B. Du Bois was one of our great Black writers who travelled through the South and wrote The Souls of Black Folk in 1903. The book was very radical for the time and even pointed out the great influx of European Jews into the South, where they exploited the Blacks through the system of "sharecropping" cotton, while selling back to them cheap manufactured goods from their cousins up North. According to The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 2 (hereafter "TSRv2"), Du Bois made his way to Dougherty County , Georgia, a farming region and home to ten thousand Blacks, who outnumbered whites by five to one. However, according to the U.S. government's report of the Industrial Commission on Immigration (1901), "Nine-tenths of the storekeepers in Dougherty County are Jewish merchants— some Russian and German Jews, but most of them Polish Jews."His observations and facts led W.E.B. Du Bois to state, "The Jew is the heir of the slave-baron in Dougherty [County]," for Blacks all over the South fell victim to a system of debt peonage called "sharecropping," which Southern so-called Jews set up and used to their advantage to make the Blacks the poorest of the poor, while at the same time making a class of Jewish cotton merchants the richest of the rich. These Jews used "sharecropped" cotton to advance from peddler to store owner to banker to international financiers. These Jews kept this economic blue print to obtain wealth to and for themselves, while they led Black people to a strategy of "non-economic liberalism."According to "TSRv2," after the publication of The Souls of Black Folk in 1903, NAACP board members Jacob Schiff and Rabbi Stephen Wise hired Du Bois to be the editor of the NAACP’s Crisis Magazine and later pressured him to alter several passages of his book that referred to this nefarious Jewish economic activity. It took fifty years of pressure at close quarters from these so-called Jews to finally tame Du Bois and made him change "Jew" to "foreigner" and "immigrant" in the 1952 edition of his book, thus concealing the Jewish presence in the post-slavery Southern economy, a fact that they never wanted exposed. Du Bois was a writer who had a firsthand view of what the Jews were doing in the South, but now his pen had been compromised, as the original voices of the Niagara Movement had been marginalized. How , and through what means, they "pressured" him is a study in how a people with a plan and hidden agenda can manipulate unsuspecting and trusting souls away from their best self-interests. Why would financier Jacob Schiff and Rabbi Stephen Wise spend so much time and effort to sway the mind of one Black man, Du Bois, while ignoring and marginalizing another Black man, Trotter? Jacob Schiff was one of the most important men behind getting Pres. Woodrow Wilson elected in 1912, and then he lobbied him to sign the legislation in 1913 that set up the Federal Reserve System. Another prominent Jew and NAACP board member Rabbi Steven Wise, who founded the Federation of American Zionists in 1897, became one of Wilson's most trusted advisors. This is the same Wilson who initiated the wholesale firing of Blacks from government positions, and established segregation for those who remained, continuing the employment of Blacks only where whites did not find them "objectionable." While Jewish board members of the NAACP were changing the economic destiny and banking system of Gentile America, "TSRv2" exposed that they were also promoting and cheering the advancement of white supremacists who dedicated their lives to ensuring that Blacks would never rise in any capacity above servant and menial labor. They supported newspapers in the South such as the Raleigh News and Observer, which became a "malicious and vindictive negro- baiting organ" of white supremacy. While these Jewish NAACP board members courted white supremacists, they at the same time controlled the direction of Black people's struggle against these same white supremacists, carefully steering Blacks away from economic development, which is a human right, toward some type of “social liberation.”Powerful Jewish forces used the NAACP to effectively change the social climate in the northern cities, which were opened up to the Blacks from the South, who in the “great migration” to the North left their farms behind to be the servants for the northern elite and their immigrant white factory workers from Europe. Southern white Jews had made their fortune off “sharecropped” cotton and a captured Black market in the South, and, having moved to the northern cities to set up their clothing factories, they brought their Black “virtual slaves” with them.Therefore, “non-economic liberalism” was a product of white hypocrites and deceivers masquerading as friends to the Black man, who saw us coming down the intelligent road of economic development, but championed the enemies of our economic rise and herded us off into the wilderness and dead end of social liberation with their lower class of Whites.

Dr. Ridgely A. Mu’min Muhammad is an agricultural economist, National Student Minister of Agriculture and Manager of Muhammad Farms for the Nation of Islam. He can be reached at: drridge@bellsouth.net

[Publication of Dr. Muhammad’s essay herein does not imply endorsement of all of his views]

II. Hoffman’s condensation of Judaism Discovered, the new book, Judaism’s Strange Gods has been published, ahead of schedule. It contains all of Hoffman’s main facts and most effective research exposing Judaism, in an easy-to-read, quality paperback.

At 381 pages in paperback, Judaism’s Strange Gods is a shortened version of Hoffman’s huge hardcover reference work, Judaism Discovered, which is now out of print in hardcover and available only in the Kindle format.

If you pre-ordered this book, please be patient. We received more than 1300 (!) pre-publication orders and we have one lady in the shipping room trying to ship all the books as fast as humanly possible, including foreign orders which require extensive customs forms.

THE NEED IS GREAT

Judaism is overwhelming the Tea Party and the Right wing, masquerading as a family values partner with patriots against the forces of evil. Hoffman blows that facade to smithereens in clear and understandable writing, and does so charitably and without hatred. The devastating facts are presented forcefully — there is no arguing with the data because it comes straight from the secret rabbinic texts themselves!

If Judaism’s Strange Gods receives sufficient publicity and distribution it has the potential to inspire the conversion of Judaizers, public admonishment of Judaism for its atrocious sins and errors, and the revival of the Kingship of Christ in our nation.

Contents of Judaism’s Strange Gods: Principal Sources of the Divine Law of Judaism; Judaism's Attack on the Prophets and Patriarchs; Judaism's Bible Code Nullifies the Word of God; Loopholes and Escape clauses; Lying; Bribery; The X-rated Talmud; Warrant for the Murder of Gentiles Groundwork for Talmudic Courts in America; Anti-Black Racism; Christians attacked in the Talmud; Judaism and Reincarnation; Star of Bohemia, Not David; Judaism and Abortion; Yom Kippur and the Kol Nidrei Nullification of Vows; Birkat HaMinim: The Curse on Christians; Child Molestation and Homosexuality; Priestcraft in the Synagogue; and much more!

Thanks to the donors and the investor who made the publication of Judaism’s Strange Gods in a quality paperback possible!

In his Eleison Comments column last week, Williamson repeated 1965 years of Catholic teaching about the responsibility for the death of Jesus Christ. He reasoned ably, citing the fact that Pontius Pilate would have never ordered Christ’s crucifixion had it not been for the demands of the majority of the Jews of Palestine.

Collective Guilt is Talmudic

We would not have published Bishop Williamson’s column had he not referred to “noble exceptions” among the Jews who did not have a hand in Christ’s death. In our own writing we have always emphasized that the notion of collective racial guilt, such as the Allied World War II doctrine that every German man, woman and child was collectively guilty of Nazi crimes and deserved death, is a reflection of a rabbinic mentality. The same collective guilt attitude is at work in the Israeli state where all Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank are seen as bearing responsibility for the crimes of Hamas and deserving of death; or for example, all prisoners released by the Israelis in return for Gilad Shalit are terrorists and criminals; none of them innocent of the charges made against them. All of this is Talmudic.

Therefore, when people stoop to draw parallels between today’s Judaics and those who demanded their Messiah’s execution 2000 years ago, declaring these 21st century Judaics collectively guilty, we err grievously on the side of the Talmudic mentality and become, in a spiritual sense, rabbis ourselves.

It must be understood that rabbinic agents are in our midst. Here is a counter-intelligence secret: the rabbis wish to sow in all movements that contest Judaism and the Talmud a collective disparagement toward all Judaics without exception, leaving them nowhere to turn among gentiles and Christians for safe haven or liberation. Consequently, they step backward into the waiting arms of their rabbinic oppressors.

Contemporary Judaics only share in the responsibility for Christ’s death spiritually and ideologically if they are adherents of Judaism or a hyper-chauvinist Zionism with a strong ethnic, tribal component. A poor schmuck who was born a “Jew” (more likely a Khazar but I will not stress the point here), is not at fault for the circumstance of his birth. In the 1920s many German-Judaics wanted freedom from the rabbis. They were admirers of Bach and Beethoven, German science and literature. They had served patriotically in the Great War. They sought to progress beyond the ghetto. They desired to share in the freedom of Western Civilization. Instead, they were collectively rebuffed and told that they possessed ineradicable genetic tendencies toward subversion and degeneracy. This is the rabbinic doctrine about gentiles and it was projected, through an occult mirror, by the German nationalist leadership of the 1920, 30s and 40s onto Judaics.

Noble Exceptions Among “the Jews"

Bishop Williamson’s column eschewed that self-destructive rut by citing "noble exceptions" among the Judaics, and fingering, not their supposed attachment to the “old covenant” (the uninformed mistake Judaism for Karaitism), but to the Talmud, which nullifies from the Mishnah onward, the Old Testament. Without these two precise distinctions which the bishop made, we could not have circulated his column.

Hence, the writing at issue was free of racism, indicted the correct source of rabbinic perversion (Talmud) and otherwise repeated foundational truths that the spiritual heirs of the Pharisees in our midst today can no more bear to read than their ideological ancestors could bear to hear from the lips of Jesus Himself.

This is a very old war of ideas. Because the allies of the rabbis have massive clout with the media of the West it was decided, in the early 60s, that the papacy would seek accommodation ("aggiornamento”) with the modern world, and bend the entire mission of the Church away from proclaiming the radical truth of the Gospel toward avoiding giving offense to those who can’t endure its truth.

Due to that momentous alteration, we now find ourselves on the stage of an absurdist theatre where Benedict XVI is ordered by the spiritual sons of the Pharisees to punish the bishop and his priestly SSPX fraternity for daring to say in public what St. Matthew, St. Paul and the Fathers of the early church taught and proclaimed concerning who was responsible for the crucifixion of Christ.

This is an extraordinary state of affairs in that it puts all authentic Christians under an obligation: to be considered good goyim free of the antisemitism libel, we must agree to refrain from shouting that the emperor has no clothes. Or we can choose to dare to speak truth to power in the face of the rabbinic chutzpah which presumes to censor the speech of the Church of Jesus Christ by ordering us to affirm a lie.

Decades ago the Church of Rome did just that with the document Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Israel’s Messiah.

Auschwitz Over Calvary

Every once in a while, even in our degenerate days, a churchman of Williamson’s mettle arises and proclaims the truth irrespective of the pressure, and pays a terrible price for it, in earthly terms anyway. The propaganda system being what it is, he can’t be allowed to do so purely; the waters must be muddied and the truth-teller defamed. Mixed into reports of Bishop Williamson proclaiming the Biblical truth about the deicide were media allusions to his “conviction” in a German court for “denying the Holocaust.”

By this label we are made to think, Ah, he’s a convicted criminal; a shady character, a felon. There is always considerable shame attached to those who contest the Talmudic imperium. The Son of God was stripped nearly naked and made to appear as a felon deserving of death. No true follower of His can expect anything less.

In Germany defense attorneys can be jailed for offering too vigorous a defense of their World War II revisionist clients, and judges sanctioned for failing to convict a revisionist defendant. The western media doesn't report this because it would impugn the verdict issued by the German-Zionist kangaroo court (forgive my candor but this is a precise description of the “justice” dispensed by that judiciary).

Bishop Williamson never “denied the Holocaust.” He did undertake a very human and Biblical act -- he doubted a Judaic fable (Titus 1:14), that six million Judaic persons died and many of them perished in "gas chambers" in Auschwitz.

Odd, is it not, that anyone in Germany may doubt the Resurrection of Christ and the Virgin Birth or even the every existence of Jesus, with complete freedom and no fear of prosecution? Yet to doubt the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz is a crime punishable by five years’ imprisonment. Pope John Paul II called Auschwitz the new Golgotha and this writer has for decades argued that Auschwitz has replaced Calvary as the central and defining pole star in the western ontology of sacred suffering. Would it not be safe to say that the evidence for this revolutionary reversal can be found in the criminal penalties attached to so-called “holocaust denial” and the freedom by which "Resurrection denial” and even denial that Jesus ever existed, are promoted throughout the media, academia and the Internet?

Oh, but it is not very prudent or politic for Williamson to take on both the deicide and the gas chambers. Not at this time. He is a hand grenade! Uranium! He destroys the hermeneutic of continuity, the negotiations of the Vatican diplomatic corps, the delicate, behind-the-scenes arrangements.

And to this we say, hallelujuah! Fresh air at last. The truth at last, at whatever cost to reputation or bank account. If we had a dozen Richard Williamsons in high places we would convert Judaics and cause the rabbinic liars and masonic ADLers to back into their shuls and confine their prevarications to the precincts of their eruv.

Modernist Catholicism Constitutes Jew Hate

But the reverse prevails for the present time and Jew-haters infest the Vatican.

Say what? Yes, Jew haters: this pope, the last three, and those who persecute Bishop Williamson, Jew haters all. Jesus Christ loved His people and that is why he retailed to them difficult truths. The demonic spirit of the modern age declares that if we love the “Jew” we will encourage him in his sins and mendacity. What is asked of loved ones: introspection, examination of conscience and self-reflection, is denied to the Judaics out of deference to their engorged egos. This is hatred.

We bow to them and thereby encourage their pride and chutzpah, intransigence, racism, and religion of lies. We sentence their women to the pathological and destructive "family purity” (sic) laws of Chazal, the halachos of niddah, with all the suffering and oppression of women which that insanity entails. We sentence their men to absolute obedience to the rabbis and thousands of rules that daily micro-manage their lives, along with the burden of institutionalized contempt for goyim and Christians.

Pope Benedict XVI requires nothing of “Jews” in the Name of Christ. No repudiation of rabbinic racism or violence. No apology for Kol Nidrei or Birkat HaMinim, just more appeasement of their megalomania. Here is the operation of occult Jew hate, so long concealed since the Renaissance and now in the open. There is more love for Judaic people in one line of a radical call to repentance and conversion from Bishop Williamson than in all the lucubrations of the Nostra Aetate Church of Rome.

Rabbinic and Zionist bigots and their Vatican enablers will go wild in the days and weeks ahead, as they always do in the face of a truth that scalds their souls. They will do their best to gibbet Bishop Williamson from the highest pole of their unending vengeance.

Hoffman is the author ofJudaism’s Strange Gods, forthcoming at the end of November from Independent History and Research.

***

Coming Soon: ADDRESSING THE LONG OVERDUE NEED FORJUDAIC SELF-CRITICISM ABOUT THE JUDAIC HERITAGE OF ANTI-CHRISTIAN HATE. WE WILL PROVE THAT THE BIRKAT HAMINIM FUNCTIONED WITHOUT QUESTION IN THE MEDIEVAL WORLD AS A RABBINIC CURSE ON CHRISTIANS.