The law was deliberately violated bythe AGES officials, Mr. ММMag. UNTERKOFLERand Mr. Mag. WÜRKNER, because they deliberately did not want to allow the use of the anticancer drugNSC 631570for the treatment of cancer patients and especially children diagnosed with cancer. On their initiative on 11th of November 2011 5 654 ampoules with NSC631570 were confiscated (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/2011-11-11-ages-niederschrift.pdf). With these actions theyconsciously made the access to the NSC 631570 for cancer patients and especially children with this diagnosimpossible all over the world. On their initiative there was ordered to confiscate as well to remove the NSC 631570 from the postal parcels sent to the cancer patients in different countries. Thanks to this medical preparation many human lives could have been saved, prolonged or at least quality of patients’ lives could have been improved.

The confiscation of all ampoules with NSC 631570 from NOWICKY PHARMA as well the prohibitionto produce and to send to customers the preparation already manufactured by DYCKERHOFF Pharma GmbH & Co KG (Köln, Germany), which dissolved theconcentrate after the quality control by the laboratoryFa. LAT in Gräfeling near Munich (Germany), filledampouleswith NSC 631570 according to GMP guidelines and packaged it,as well as the prohibition for Fa. LAT in Gräfeling near Munich (Germany), which performed experiments according to GLP guidelines, to conduct research with NSC 631570, made this drug inaccessible for the cancer patients (and especially children) all over the world.

This illegal action against me began in 2011 after I suggested to the Austrian Government to provide my anticancer preparation NSC 631570 free of charge for the treatment of 11 children with cancer who hadalready exhausted all other types of conventional treatmentand who had been sent home to die. This step I made after the dissemination of very positive results of the research conducted by Dr. Burkhard Aschhoff from Germany(http://www.ukrin.com/docs/Aschoff_2000.pdf). From August1997 to 31.12.1999 203 cancer patients were treated at his clinic who had already exhausted all kinds of conventional therapy and who due to regression and/or progress of the disease no further forms of treatment were available. Therapy was started with the alkaloid derivatives from Chelidonium Majus L. This treatment was conducted in accordance with § 73 Abs. 3 AMG.

Dr. Burkhard Aschhoff presented the results of this treatment of these 203 patients with various cancer diseases. The point was that all these patients were terminally ill and had been sent home to die by their doctors. Among them there were 16 children. The results of this treatment were: amongadults there was a complete remissionin16.58%of cases, itwas possible to achieve apartial remission in62.57% of cases and for20.86%of patients there was no influence.At the same time the results with children were as follows: complete remission 62.5%, partial remission 31.25% and no influence 6.25%.Such a high percentage of complete remissions with children with help of the medical preparation NSC 631570made me decide to make an offerto give this medicine free of charge. However, all my letters have still remained unanswered.(http://www.ukrin.com/de/taxonomy/term/18 )

The question arises then: why didn’t this action happen for example in 1983, 1993 or 1994 when the results of the clinical studies, conducted according to the protocolsapproved by the Austrian Ministry of Health, were submitted? E. g., the comparison of the research results shows that in the group of patientswith colotectal cancerwho were treated only with NSC 631570 the survival rate was 78.6% (up to 21 months) and in corresponding control group 33.3%. (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/Susak_1996.pdf)

The positive results of the treatment of children with cancer with NSC 631579 should be noted: 62.5% compete remission withchildren and 16.58% withadults, meraning that the perrcentage amongchildren was 4 times higher than withadults. We all know that chidren arethe most important thing we have.If my proposal had been acceptedby the Ministry then it would have been possible to treat the children, their successful treatment would have been able to have been concealed and NSC 631570 should have been registered in Austria. These facts arethe only way to explain this inhuman crime and this horrible violation of the law.

The worst thing is that this illegal action still lasts until today.

I see it as extremely critical because, due to the present circumstances, many patients cannot continue their treatment because they are being denied access to the medicine.

What is NSC 631570 ?

NSC 631570 isthe only anticancer preparation which in therapeutic dose kills cancer cells but does not damage healthy cells. This selective effect of the drug has been demonstrated and proved by 12 universities throughout the world (including Rochester University (USA), University in Tübingen (Germany), University of Milan (Italy) etc.). (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/Roublevskaia_2000.pdf)

This preparation is produced on the basis of celandine alkaloids according to patent Nr. 354644. It accumulates in tumor cells few minutes after application. This is well illustrated under ultraviolet light thanks to the autofluorescence of the preparation. This medicine also kills viruses (http://www.ukrain.ua/statti/203.htm, http://www.ukrain.ua/statti/217.htm, http://www.ukrain.ua/statti/165.htm )and regenerates the immune system. It also has the ability to encapsulate cancer tumors which facilitates their surgical removal. The efficacy, safety and quality o fNSC631570 have been proved by many scientists from different countries, on the basis of theirexperiments atacademic institutions and research centers.(http://www.ukrin.com/en/efficacy) Their results have been presented at international medical congresses and arewell documentedin the specialistliterature(178 of these professional publications are represented on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=UKRAIN ).

As we already mentioned Dr. Burkhard Aschhoff presented the results of this treatment of 203 patients with various cancer diseases. The point was that all these patients were terminally ill and had been sent home to die by their doctors. Among them there were 16 children. The results of this treatment were: amongadults there was a complete remissionin16.58%of cases, itwas possible to achieve apartial remission in62.57% of cases and for20.86%of patients there was no influence.At the same time the results with children were as follows: complete remission 62.5%, partial remission 31.25% and no influence 6.25%.(http://www.ukrin.com/docs/Aschoff_2000.pdf ).

Everyone knows that children are certainly of the greatest importance in our lives. There is therefore almost nothing else that can affect a parent so much as a child being diagnosed with cancer. The family’s world falls apart. Apart from the serious disease family members must face the inhuman consequences to be expected during the course of chemotherapy. Hair loss caused by the highly destructive effect of the medicine on cells, inflammations which rage all over the body, constant vomiting and many other serious problems. If this ordeal is then a complete failure, it becomes clear to them that all these additional stresses and strains were of absolutely no avail and the child is more or less destroyed.

It should be noted that NSC 631570has excellent efficacy while treating children. This has been proved by clinical studies and therapeutic successes.

To show the potential and influence of this medical preparation on the children we present 8 medical histories which are well documented and listed below.

1) The three year-old Stefan Dan with the diagnosis of generalised lymphangiomatosis was sent home by doctors in 1995 as having exhausted all forms of therapy. (http://www.ukrin.com/en/obstructive-tactics-consequences) Stefan is now 23 years old. He is intelligent, can read, write and paint and plays the piano but is unfortunately lamed for life through the incomprehensible prohibition of Ukrain therapy.

2) Another case showing very impressive results is that of Daniel B. suffering from xeroderma pigmentosum who had to undergo 56 operations before the age of 16. (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/daniel-b-english.pdf)He began treatment with Dr. Aschhoff. Today he is a 27 years-old man and can work normally. It should be noted that this is the only case in the world of a xeroderma pigmentosum patient who has survived so long.

3) The 13 years-old Mariana Katic, who was suffering from tuberous sclerosis, was discharged from hospital as a hopeless case and treated with NSC 631570 in 1996. Ms.Katic is 29 years-old now and has given birth to a healthy son. (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/2003-nowicki.pdf)

4) An 8-years-old girl was twice operated for a Grade I astrocytoma of the chiasma. Because of the early recurrence and the fact that the tumour could only be extirpated subtotally NSC 631570monotherapy was initiated.(http://www.ukrin.com/docs/steinacker_1996_2.pdf)

5) Dr. Frank Daudert from Germany reported on his therapeutic success with a 7 years-old girl diagnosed with a brain tumor. “After 14 days I was astounded to see that her symptoms of paralysis were declining, the oblique position of the head had returned to normal and the child was again able to swallow. After a further 14 days the child once more attended the UNI-Klinik in Munich to check if the tumor was operable. During the course of further examinations it was found that the tumor had in fact reduced in size and the tumor was operable. The operation was carried outsuccessfullyand suffered no relapse later”. (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/308 )

6) Ewing’s sarcoma, first diagnosed 18.3.1996, histologically verified;tumor resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. NSC 631570therapy started on 13 October 1997.The patient, a 10-years-old girl, was treated in the high-risk arm of the EICESS 92 study. MRI examination of the pelvic region on 1.9.1997 showed progression in the cystic-edematous process. She was then treated with combined NSC 631570and local hyperthermia therapy. The therapy series consisted of 15 mg NSC 631570in an infusion with 250 ml glucose and 5 g vitamin C, followed by local hyperthermia treatment (http://ukrin.com/en/ewings-sarcoma-ukrain-therapy).

7) A 9-years-old girl with Ewing’s sarcoma who had been discharged from hospital with all treatment options exhausted and left to her fate. Thanks to his help and the medicine Ukrain she survived her illness and is now working as a nurse (http://ukrin.com/en/ewings-sarcoma-ukrain-therapy)

8) Patient S.S., an eight year old boy, was presented with an ulcering lesion of the nose. As he was 10 month old, xeroderma pigmentosum was diagnosed. (Patients with xeroderma pigmentosum have a severe sensitivity to all sources of ultraviolet radiation, especially sunlight and develop serious sunburns with onset of poikilodermia in the light-exposed skin. There is a wide range of symptoms: blindness and deafness, blistering or freckling on minimal sun exposure, developmental disabilities, dwarfism and hypergonadism, increased skin and eye cancers, and mental retardation. Squamous cell carcinomas, basal cell carcinomas and malignant melanomas already appear in childhood. The majority of patients die before reaching adulthood because of metastases of malignant melanoma). Until the age of three years the number of skin lesions increased considerably. In May 2002 skin cancer (squamous cell carcinoma) at the nose was diagnosed, T4NXM0, histologically verified. From May till June 2002 three cycles of chemotherapy were administered (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, vinblastine). The therapy failed and the tumors grew up. Clinical investigation in April 2004 revealed deforming malignant melanoma of the nose with invasion into the cartilage of nasal septum, measuring 3x3 cm. On the 20th of May 2004 the therapy with Ukrain was started, 5 mg intravenously twice a week, up to a total dose of 85 mg. One month after the last administration of Ukrain a complete regression of the tumor was revealed. The skin defect was partially replaced with connective tissue. Xeroderma skin lesions improved throughout the body (http://ukrin.com/en/xeroderma).

Until then, notonehad survivedchildhoodwith thediseases that Stephan, Daniel or Mariana had.Stephan began the treatment with NSC 631579 at the age of 3 andnowis 23 years-old; Daniel – at the age of 15 (from that time he had to undergo 56 operations) and is now 27 years-old; Mariana began her treatment with this preparation aged13 and now has a healthy 12year-old child (it should be noted, that patients with her diagnosis donotsurvive their 14th birthday) and the female patient with Ewing’s sarcoma is completely cured andnowworks as a nurse. All these facts should compelus to think seriously about the potential of this medical preparation, because all these children were inahopeless condition fromamedical point of view.

ThenI took into consideration the fact that in Ukraine this preparation was registered for the third time and itsefficacy, quality and safety were demonstrated and provedon6thOctober 2011 at apress conference in Kiev I made an offer to give NSC 631570 free of charge for 100 children in Ukraine. Complete remissions would have beenachievedin cases of at least 58 children and without any negative side effects in comparison with chemotherapy. A press conference was held and several people attempted to disrupt it. They were outraged that a toxic medicine could be given to children. It should be noted that at the press conference a relative of the patientMr. Stepan Gawrylow, Mrs. Olga Kowaltschuk,was shouting and arguing that her brother died after using NSC 631570 and waving her brother’s death certificate. The point is that in1998 this patient was diagnosed with metastatic kidney cancer as well with distant metastases in the lungs (which means stage IV cancer). The patient was treated with NSC 631570 in 1998 after he had been diagnosed and died in 2003 and thus he lived for 5 years.The patients with such a diagnosis using chemotherapy live for several weeks orafew months at most. Thispatient is thus not a victim but excellent proof of the positive effect of NSC 631570. Mrs. Olga Kowaltschuk was complaining and claiming that with the help of chemotherapy her brother would have lived much longer (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/312 )

At the same press conference I received the letter written by Mr. Unterkofler in English. And during a protest demonstration on14thOctober 2011at the Austrian Embassy in Kiev the organisers of the demonstration gave Austrian Embassy officials the letter written by Mr. Unterkofler but in Russian. This demonstration of about 40 people in Kiev was organised against the company NOWICKY PHARMA in Vienna. Iwas accused of wanting to carry out experiments with NSC 631570 on Ukrainian orphans. On the video it can be clearly seen that after the when the the demonstration finished the participants received money for taking part in it, which thus means that the demonstration was ordered.

As I found out from the document “Anlassbericht” written by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Internal Affairs(GZ: 2 699606/1-II/BK/31o55) from 18thJanuary 2012 to thePublic Prosecutor’s Office, Vienna(My Statement to this document – http://ukrin.com/de/node/287 )on7thNovember 2011MMMag. Unterkofler and Mag. Würknerappealed to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Austria with a request to open a criminal case against me as a criminal because I was sellingamedical preparation which had noeffect. It claimed thatinstead ofusing chemotherapy patients took NSC 631579 and thus I brought harm to them. Four case histories of patientswhowere called “victims” were added:

1) The first reason for the instigating the criminal case was an anonymous complaint from 19th October 2011 written by an unknown woman. The woman describes in her anonymous letter the death of a female patient, who allegedly had used NSC 631570 and died in 2009. The question is: why this letter was written in 2011 and not immediately after the death of the patient? Another interesting fact is that this letter arises at a time when a fake copy of NSC 631570 appeared in Austria produced on the basis of celandine (it must be noted that this drug found its appliance in clinics) and was manufactured not byNOWICKY PHARMA but by some uknown group of people in Austria.

If this fact actually occurred, the author of the letter would have written it immediately in 2009. The author of this letter as well the patient described in it are still unknown. Therefore, according to Austrian law it cannot be a reason for any legal action.

2) The second “victim” is Mr. Stefan Hagenbüchl who had small cell lung cancer. People with such a diagnosis live 6 months and with chemotherapy – 8 months at most. With patients with this disease water accumulates in the lungs which eventually causes death. This is what happened with this patient and the doctors had to pump this water out of his body. After using NSC 631570 he no longer had water in his lungs anymore. After the diagnosis this patient lived for almost two years. This example is excellent proof and confirmation of a positive influence of NSC 631570 for the treatment cancer patients with this diagnosis. (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/311)

3) The third “victim” was from Ukraine. A relative of the patient Mr. Stepan Gawrylow, Mrs. Olga Kowaltschuk, wrote a complaint. In 1998 the patient was diagnosed with metastatic kidney cancer as well with the distant metastases in the lungs (which means stage IV cancer). He started treating with NSC 631570 in 1998 after he has being diagnosed and died in 2003 and thus lived for 5 years.The patients with such a diagnosis using chemotherapy live for several weeks or few months at most. So this patient is not a victim but excellent proof of the positive effect of NSC 631570. (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/312 )

4) The fourth “victim” is Mr. Erwin Kellner. Diagnosed with pancreatic cancer,who didnotuse NSC 631570 at allas we know now from the statementof Dr. Frank Dauert, who was treating this patient: - “After looking through the invoices I am certain that Mr. Kellner was not treated with NSC 631570 in my clinic. If ‘infusion (Chel. Majus)’ is listed on invoices, it refers to another celandine product”.

Therefore, this cannot be the reason for my prosecution, since this patient did not use NSC 631570 but a completely different new drug on the basis of celandine produced ​​not by my company NOWICKY PHARMA but by an unknown group of people in Austria. (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/308 )

Based on these documents the representatives of AGES and Austrian Federal Ministry of Internal Affairs came into my office on 11th November 2011 and confiscated 5,654 ampoules with NSC 631570. (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/2011-11-11-ages-niederschrift.pdf) Besidesthis I was told that the other reason for the confiscation of my medical preparation was that the registration of NSC 631570 in Ukraine had beenwithdrawnfew days previously. The fact that the AGES officials illegally confiscated all the ampoules of NSC631570, justifying their actions by the false fact that the registration of NSC 631570in Ukraine had been withdrawn, gives a reason to believe that such an action had been ordered and that the AGES officials were sure that Ukrainian officials would support it. However, the Minister of Health of Ukraine had not withdrawn the registration of the NSC 631570 but only temporarily suspended it in the following week. (Appendix 3) After that he was dismissed by thePresident of Ukraine.

The AGES representatives brought this to the attention of officials of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Austria who are not medical specialists and thus could not properly assess the situation. The AGES officials deliberately misled the officials of the Ministryof Internal Affairs and thus caused irreparable harm to patients worldwide. Even in countries where NSC 631570 was registered, e. g. in Ukraine, Georgia, Mexico, Tunisia as well in countries where it has Orphan Drug Status – in USA and in Australia.

The rejection of the offer to provide free of charge NSC 631570 for the treatment of 11 children sent home to die (in some cases it could be the last chance for recovery, sometimes it could be possible to prolong a patient’s life and in some cases even the complete remission could be achieved), provokes some doubts that this event was initiated and organized by AGES representatives.

Justification of the above-mentioned actions was: ”On the one hand NOWICKY is accused in this letter of wanting to carry out experiments on Ukrainian orphans. On the other hand he and his “henchmen” are accused of illegally having enriched themselves for years by the sale of UKRAIN as a „cure“ for the widest range of cancer types – although such an effect cannot be proven”.

Obviously the authorities donot know about the numerous publications about NSC 631570 (there are about 300), 178 of which are published on the scientific website “Pubmed”, where the best scientific publications are collected. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=UKRAIN).

The reason for my arrest was: “Based on current investigations it can be supposed that since 2008 there are approximately a further 100 injured parties in Austria due to using UKRAIN. However, according to our present knowledge UKRAIN is distributed worldwide and the number of injured parties cannot currently be foreseen but should be around 8,000 people”.

As previouslymentioned, the first “victim” was anonymous. The complaint from the end ofthe year 2011 was written by an unknown woman. In her anonymous letter the woman describes the death of a female patient from Vienna, who allegedly had used Ukraine and died in 2009. The question is: why was this letter written in 2011 and not immediately after the death of the patient? If this actually occurred, the author of the letter should have written it immediately in 2009. The author of this letter as well the patient described in it both still unknown.

The second “victim” was from Ukraine Mr. Stepan Gawrylow who in 1998 was diagnosed with metastatic kidney cancer as well with distant metastases in the lungs (which means stage IV cancer). He started treating with NSC 631570 in 1998 after he had been diagnosed and died in 2003 and thus he lived for 5 years.Patients with such a diagnosis using chemotherapy live for several weeks or a few months at most.(http://www.ukrin.com/docs/2012-09-04-anordnung-der-durchsuchung.pdf, p.6, para. 1)

Moreover, the statementsof 10 employees of the company who testifiedtruthfully, were not taken into consideration and they were called as defendants. However the false statement of the eleventh worker of my company, Wassil Boychuk, born on 22nd February 1966, who had been working at the company formany years, wastaken into account and he was considered as a witness. It seems that he intentionally gave false information stating that he had never seen people cured with help of NSC 631570 and that I supposedly forbadepatients toaccept chemotherapy.(http://www.ukrin.com/docs/2012-09-04-anordnung-der-durchsuchung.pdf, p. 7, para. 3)However, as can be seen from the staementsof Manuela Hellar and Stephen Hagenbüchl, NSC 631570 was prescribed them by their doctors in accordance with§ 8 of AMG (http://www.jusline.at/8._AMG.html).

To find the justification for their illegal actions the statement of some witnesses were made ​​public, someof which are listed below:

Witness Mr. Wolfgang Stasny, husband of Mrs. Anita Stasny, in his letter of10th October 2009 thankedme for my drug: “For my family and I it is almost a miracle that she is still with us. Several doctors told her (…) that she would not live to see her thirtieth birthday.” (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/306) In his statement of 20th November 2012 (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/307, p. 4, para. 2) Mr. Stasny states: “My wife died on 4th November 2010 at the age of 33.” On the page 5, para. 1 of his statement Mr. Stasny can be read: “Question: what costs arose for you or your relatives from the purchase of Ukrain? Answer: None. Dr. Nowicky made UKRAIN available to us free of charge. And also covered the costs of staying at the Proleben Clinic. Exactly how these costs were covered I don’t know.” (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/307, p. 5, para. 1) He continues: “I include myself in this case as a private claimant.” (http://www.ukrin.com/de/node/307, p. 5, para. 9) (!!!) At the end of October 2010 the familyof Mrs. Anita Stasny was persuaded to stop taking Ukrain and to use chemotherapy. Approximately two weeks after treatment with chemotherapy Mrs. Stasny died.

How the authoritieswere trying to influence thestatements of the witnesses is clearly visible from the protocol of the witnesses Mr. Christian Rossbach as well as Mrs. Andrea Schebek and Mr. Schärf.

According to the statement of Mr. Christian Rossbach from 29th October 2012 we find that wife Petra Rossbach was diagnosed with cervicalcancer at stage PAP IV at the beginning of 2003 and died in June 2009 so she lived for more than 6 years. And according to the statement of Mrs. Andrea Schebek on 12th October 2012 we find that her sister took only 20 to 30 ampoules of NSC 631570. We would like to stress the fact that this patient lived for more than 6 years after having taken only 20 to 30 ampoules of NSC 631570. However, Mr. Christian Rossbach says in his statement: “To protect my civil claims I would like to include myself in the case as a private participant.”

This is a methodwhich Austrian authorities have used in this casewith NOWICKY PHARMA. Millions of people were killed help in the Soviet Union with the help of this method. It was invented by Mr. Felix Dzerzhinsky, who was actually a founder of the KGB, and who used to say: “Give us a person and we will find the reason for his arrest”.

And the worst happened on 04thSeptember 2012 around 60 officialsaccompanied by an AGES official when stormed all of my business and private premises at nine o’clock in the morning. More than200,000ampoules with my preparation, all the products of research, аll credit cards, cash and savings books of my whole family were confiscated. I was arrested and imprisoned. (http://www.ukrin.com/docs/2012-09-04-anordnung-der-durchsuchung.pdf).

If the authorities had anydoubtsconcerning the results of all the studies conducted with NSC 631570, it would have been the responsibility of the Austrian Ministry of Health to have checked these results.

Worldwide, every year thousands of people die of cancer as a result of the prohibition of treatment with NSC 631570 which is obviously a direct offence against all cancer patients.

In March 2013 I wrote a letter to the Austrian Minister of Health Mr. Alois Stöger, in which I described the situation with my preparation NSC 631570in detail but still have not received any reply from him. (http://www.ukrin.com/en/node/313 )

The research studies proved the fact that NSC 631570 can improve the life quality of some terminally ill cancer patients, can extend their lives and in some cases even achieve the complete remission. Preventing access to the NSC 631570 for the cancer patients is a violation of the human rights all over the world.

- Over 200,000 ampouls of NSC 631570 were confiscated in the period from 4thuntil the 18th September 2012.Tis action is contrary to thelaw“AMG”, §76b, p.5 – (http://www.jusline.at/76b._AMG.html) The appeal to the Court to legalize this actionwas dismissed by the Austrian Court and it was ordered to return the ampoules to the holder. However, Istill havenot received the confiscated ampoules with NSC 631570 until today.

- To order the return of the confiscated material and recognize the moral damage caused by these illegal actions because I was arrested without warning on 4th September 2012 and my passport is still confiscated.

- To compensate the moral damage caused to all of us:Wassil NOWICKY, W. N., B. N., Juri H., Heidrun T., Yarorslav Y., Vasyl KH., Elisabeth S., A. N., Ulrike T., Milan T., Stefan K., because in the mass media we werepresented as a criminal association that was enrichingitselfby selling a drug which had noeffect and thus were deceivingpeople. This is contrary to the facts.

P.S. As a child I experienced the war and was also in a concentration camp but what I was forced to experience in September 2012 was not comparable. During the war all forms of reason were destroyed – brother fought against brother and neighbour attacked neighbour.

On 4 September 2012 more than 50 officers stormed our house, took away the key to our flat and put me in prison, where I had to spend six weeks. These 50 officers then terrorised my family for two weeks and took away all our money, including our children’s savings books. We still do not know exactly what was confiscated and I have still not received a list of confiscated goods. Stalin tormented millions of people with such methods. We should not remain silent about this.

The public has a right to know who deployed 50 officials to act so unlawfully at the cost of the state.

During a house search at least one officer and one witness should enter a room, sign the search record and then close off the room. Not as in my case when officers arbitrarily rummaged through everything and were able to take me away without showing any form of documentation.

I can only find one explanation for such behaviour which is that with my invention – an anti-cancer preparation that attacks only cancer cells while leaving healthy cells undamaged, something that every cancer researcher has been striving for – I have pre-empted the political and economic interests of certain power structures.

My first patients have already lived longer than 25 years and even those who used my medicament and have spoken against me during these legal proceedings have ultimately lived for years rather than months.