Terror suspects entitled to reasons

Share via

Suspected terrorists who brought proceedings for abuse of process relating to the manner in which they had been removed from Somaliland to the United Kingdom and were then made subject to control orders and terrorism prevention and investigation measures were entitled to see the Home Secretary’s objections to their case for alleged collusion and mistreatment in their removal.

The Home Secretary was not permitted to confine reasons for rejecting their case on those issues to a closed judgment. The applicants and the public should not be denied all knowledge of the extent to which their factual and/or legal case had

Subscribe now

Login

Already a subscriber?

To see the full article you need to subscribe

Subscribe

Login

More from Law Reports

Chancery Division
Published: August 3, 2015
Flanagan v Liontrust Investment Partners LLP and Others
Before Mr Justice Henderson
Judgment July 24, 2015
The doctrine of repudiatory breach could have no application to multi-party
agreements which fell within the scope of section 5 of the Limited Liability
Partnerships Act 2000

Privy Council
Published: July 29, 2015
Robinson v State of Trinidad and Tobago
Before Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, Lord Clarke of
Stone-cum-Ebony, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson
Judgment July 20, 2015
The acceptance of pleas of guilty to manslaughter in appropriate cases was of
public benefit as it avoided trials on non-issues which would be both
expensive to the public and distressing to many of those involved