The Blog That Burns

Warning: This post may come across as burnier-than-thou, and I apologize in advance if so - it's not my intention, but where that line between passionate and burnier-than-thou lies is different for everyone.

Let's get this out of the way: Burning Man is a festival. Unequivocally. What it isn't is a music festival in the sense of events ranging from Coachella to Lightning in a Bottle are, and it's the use of the word 'festival' to lump Burning Man in with music festivals that bugs me. (And I've got nothing against music festivals at all.)

There is a fundamental difference between the two:

I haven't exactly been fair to music festivals in selecting the two pictures here, admittedly. No idea who the idiots on the left are, but the awesome woman on the right is Kristin Humphries.

We create Burning Man.We do it without much coordination (camp placement, early entry passes mainly) from the organizers. And we do it for free, as a gift.

Contrast that with music festivals, where everywhere you look someone is trying to make a buck off you, and where the management pays people to come entertain an audience. They're completely different animals to my mind.

Burning Man

Minimal vendors. You are not a commercial victim once you're on the playa.

Virtually all activities provided as a gift by attendees, for attendees.

It's all about participation.

Music Festivals

Everything is for sale.

Virtually all activities organized and created by the festival management.

It's all about watching paid performers.

There are plenty of other differences too, of course, but those are the ones that are the most salient to me, and make Burning Man different enough that I personally just avoid using the word festival to refer to it.

I mean, we have a word for it, and it works really well: city**, as in Black Rock City.

Because that's what it is. It's not a rave. It's not a concert. It's not a music festival. It's a temporary city that rises from the dust every year like a goddamn phoenix thanks to the generosity of spirit and incredibly hard work that the non-tourists put in. Did you know that the hard-working placement team placed over 1300 camps in 2014? Think about that - that means there are over 1200 camps providing some kind of interactivity to the city. Where else do you get that kind of density of experience besides a city?

And like other cities, you'll find many different things in the it. You'll find bars. Radio stations. Newspapers. Raves. Roller rinks. Classes. Participatory sex seminars. Dojos. Restaurants (Dust City Diner!). Temples. Bakeries. Bike repair 'shops'. On and on and on. Hell, you'll find a whole installation art festival as soon as you step onto the open playa. And of course, you'll find a lot of music stages, because it's a city whose inhabitants definitely do place a lot of importance on music.

And once again, it's largely built by the city's inhabitants. By us, for us. Just like in permanent cities. A central authority builds the basic infrastructure, and we build the rest. We just do it all as a gift rather than as commerce.

City is at least as accurate as festival as it frames the event in our minds such that some of the ideals we value, like participation, communal effort, and civic responsibility, are simply natural outgrowths of that framing. Of course you don't simply passively consume in a city - you live in it. Of course you want to work together with your community to make it a better place. And of course you care about the welfare of those around you.

And yeah, I do get that calling it a temporary city might seem a little pretentious to some ears, but I think it's a far more accurate and meaningful term than music festival for it (though just 'festival' is fine), so that's what I use. May the haters be forever afflicted with bros.

**Some people claim the correct spelling of city in this context is actually c-u-l-t. It is difficult to dispute sometimes, and certainly I have friends who wonder why I won't shut the hell up about it already.

Addendum: Reddit user 'theseekerofbacon' made a good point: "I would describe thinking of burning man as a giant rave/party is like going to a major city and only ever visiting the tourist locations.It's bright and flashy and the easiest to talk about, but it doesn't even cover a sliver of what the city has to offer."

Where the hell had BM gone wrong? This was meant to be a community where the basic rule applies: first, do no harm. I got the middle finger from an asshole who was driving much too fast: A) he was kicking up a lot of dust and B) he might hit and even kill someone. Community standards meant squat to that bastard; but he bought a ticket, so he was Entitled.

Reply

Deepdownjoe

8/23/2015 06:03:15 pm

Why can't it be both? Are the terms mutually exclusive?

Reply

Jimbo splice

8/24/2015 01:10:35 am

How do you know those bros in the picture aren't just practicing their own kind of radical self expression? Or maybe their douchebag costumes are part of an ironic performance art piece, you never know. Judge not...

Reply

ApolloPan

8/24/2015 06:52:16 am

"Minimal vending" is rather new- seems like "No Vending" was the rule, before the Ten Principles appeared. Also, there are fewer tiny children & Federal Agents at most music festivals.

Categories

Please like the Burn.Life FB page to get BM info, news, opinion pieces, and more.

I'm Dr. Yes, a fan of Burning Man, Burners, and Burner culture.

Burn.Life is a non-commercial, hobbyist website and no commerce, ads, paid endorsements are involved. Any products mentioned or linked to are done so because I or people I trust have used them and I view them as reasonable recommendations. You can email me here: yes (-at-) burn (-dot-) life.