I think this broadcast format of skeptics vs. believers has run its course. It's become remarkably boring.

The dynamic is predictably polarized, and we watch people getting pissed off at and then rudely interrupting each other rather than hearing any substantive discussion at length.

The more informative way to handle this would be to have a skeptic segment and a believer segment without any televised verbal combat among the parties. However, broadcasters live with the mistaken assumption that we viewers enjoy watching people argue and behave badly toward each other. Actually, most of us really don't.

This is just more of the same tired old TV we've been watching forever, especially from Larry King the master of this kind of schlock. Just because he routinely covers UFOs doesn't mean he's any friend to those with a serious interest in the subject. He's likely done more harm to the subject of UFOs than anyone else.

I'd rather see a serious UFO discussion on tv than none at all. It's better than Chasing UFOs!

As for the "skeptics vs. believers" format, James Fox makes it clear multiple times that he is not saying UFOs are extraterrestrial -- only that UFOs are a genuine mystery that deserve serious study. The irony is, it's Fox who is the real skeptic, and Shermer the believer.