Followers

Friday, May 13, 2016

Poor Refugees Make For Convenient Scapegoats

One would be forgiven
for thinking the Kenyan government has something against sheltering the poor.
The last two weeks have displayed some reflexive, ill-advised and even callous
decision making that has left hundreds of thousands of our most vulnerable citizens
facing the prospect of enduring nights out in the cold and refugees being
pressed back into the arms of the very oppressors they had fled from in the
first place.

Last week, I noted
that on his visit to the site of the collapsed building in Huruma where at
least 50 people died, President Uhuru Kenyatta did not appear overly concerned
about the fate of the many who would be rendered homeless by his order that all
Nairobi residents living in unsafe buildings be evicted. By his administration’s
own count, more than half of the city’s buildings were unsafe, the vast
majority in poor areas.

Then came another
decision seemingly out of the blue. The Dadaab refugee camp in the remote northern
part of the country has been ordered to empty by November, the hundreds of
thousands of refugees living there to be forcibly repatriated, most to still
warring Somalia. This not only violates Kenya’s obligations under international
law, but also rubbishes an arrangement with the United Nations High Commissioner
For Refugees for voluntary repatriation of Somali refugees. But more than that,
like with the poor in Nairobi, government’s treatment of refugees exposes a
callous disregard for their humanity and welfare.

It has long been clear
that the poor in Kenya have been considered to be little more than sources for
elite plunder, foot soldiers for elite battles and excuses for elite failures.
The foreign poor have been especially badly treated by the state - relegated to
the margins of society; confined in remote camps; robbed and raped by both
state officials and bandits (who are many times one and the same); and then
scapegoated for the government’s own security failures.

In an article
published in the UK explaining the decision to close the camps, Interior
Secretary Joseph Ole Nkaisserry says it was prompted by national security
concerns, and especially the threat posed by Al Shabaab terrorists whom, the
government claims, used the camps to plan and execute attacks like the September
2013 Westgate Mall atrocity. Of course, the Secretary was not concerned with
inconveniences like facts and history.

Perhaps there is a
good reason why the piece was published abroad. Many back home will remember
that the though the government never provided any tangible evidence linking
Dadaab to Westgate, this did not stop it demonizing refugees as security
threats. Further, many will recall Operation Usalama Watch in April 2014 which
was little more than officially sanctioned pillage of the sort residents in the
North East are unfortunately familiar, cloaked in the language of
counter-terrorism.

Even more importantly,
many will remember the government’s shambolic response to Westgate and other
subsequent attacks, the many failures to act on intelligence to stop the
attacks and the failure to institute promised public inquiries into them. Many
will remember that it was easier to blame the refugees rather than look at the
real causes and failures leading to the atrocities.

Of course this did not
stop Gen Nkaissery doubling down on his accusations. In an address to the local
press a few days later, he accused the refugees of everything from gun running
to wildlife poaching. Again, little evidence was offered for the claims. It was
another blatant attempt to blame the refugees for the government’s own shortcomings.
For example, despite the photogenic bonfires with which it likes to declare its
commitment to wildlife conservation, the government’s actual record in this
area is far from inspiring.

This same dynamic is
present in the response to Huruma and in the implication that poor families
move into decrepit buildings out of choice. The idea of evictions, and now of
giving those displaced by the collapse tiny amounts to help them move on,
implies there is somewhere for them to go. Yet as Kwame Owino of the Institute
for Economic Affairs noted in November 2014, what is commonly seen as a housing
problem is actually an income and employment problem. He says that in a country in which poverty is
pervasive, “a cheap house will necessarily be a bad house.”

Of course the reasons
for poor incomes and high land and construction costs are to be found squarely
within the policies pursued by the government as well as the interests it has
prioritized. But, as with refugees, it is easier to blame the poor.

1 comment:

Anonymous
said...

The refugees will be given voter cards in the election...try track them down and prove me wrong! Why do you think the kit was given to Nys...? These guys are always ahead....plus cbk directors are still not in place one year later....so campaign money can flow.