A campaign spokesman said Wednesday that the campaign was "looking into" whether to ask for a recount in Kentucky, where Sanders narrowly lost on Tuesday night, and he fired up his crowd in Southern California Tuesday night by calling out the Democratic establishment.

The Sanders campaign on Tuesday did condemn unruly behavior from supporters and those who made threats to party leaders, but made clear it is sticking with its stance that the party is subverting the process in a way that benefits Clinton.

Location: "You are the poster child for an uninformed brainwashed American" -OmegaConcern

Posts: 20,666

Sanders is a shit head. He apparently wants to go full Nader on this election.

No matter the rules at this point it is impossible for him to win the nomination. He can't win enough delegates and he won't win the majority of Dem Primary votes either. Unlike Obama, who finished behind Clinton by 700k votes in 2008, Sandera is already 3,000,000 votes behind and not closing the gap

But he keeps telling his cult members that he can win "if only the system wasn't rigged..."

The Democratic Party allowed him to run. They could have shut him out last year but they didnt. He wasn't even a Democrat. If he wants to change Dem primary rules why did he only start pissing and moaning about it once he got so far behind Clinton? This was a none issue for him prior to 12 months ago. The individual States and State parties establish their primary rules and laws. Sanders is operating under the same rules as his opponent.

There's nothing controversial or illegal about Clinton's emails. She did the same as the Secretaries of State before her.

This is a partisan shit show with no basis in law.

No she didn't do the same thing. No Sec-State ever put a private server in their house until Hillary. There's no comparing Colin Powell and Condi Rice's using a private email account (A TOTAL OF 3 EMAILS BETWEEN THEM ON THOSE ACCOUNTS) to Hillary Clinton having an entire server placed at a private residence (which she used FOR 4 TO 5 YEARS) which is why over 140 FBI agents are on the investigation.

But nice try towing the DNC party line attempting yet another cover-up of Clinton criminality.

Sanders is a shit head. He apparently wants to go full Nader on this election.

No matter the rules at this point it is impossible for him to win the nomination. He can't win enough delegates and he won't win the majority of Dem Primary votes either. Unlike Obama, who finished behind Clinton by 700k votes in 2008, Sandera is already 3,000,000 votes behind and not closing the gap

But he keeps telling his cult members that he can win "if only the system wasn't rigged..."

The Democratic Party allowed him to run. They could have shut him out last year but they didnt. He wasn't even a Democrat. If he wants to change Dem primary rules why did he only start pissing and moaning about it once he got so far behind Clinton? This was a none issue for him prior to 12 months ago. The individual States and State parties establish their primary rules and laws. Sanders is operating under the same rules as his opponent.

Spoken like a true Communist: Party over nation and rules be damned and when shown facts that support a rigged vote -- deny, deny, deny.

This is like the pro-Hillary crowd saying there’s no proof Hillary is influenced by big money donors. They want an unfair standard of proof — irrefutable evidence and admissions. Who cares that the Clinton Foundation gets 8 figure donations from Saudi Arabia and then soon after the State department approves unprecedented weapons sales to them?

The Pike County Clerk’s office told local Kentucky station WKYT there were issues with one of their card readers which caused a delay in the numbers and as a result, the AP then erased Sanders’ votes, pushing Hillary to the lead by over 4,000 votes.

bernie sanders is just a fuckin human being. this worship of him is really disturbing, and the most confounding things is that these are the same people who did this with obama in 08 and then when they realized that the real world is not an ideological feel good playground they turned on him like a pet chimp. how fuckin naive are you all that you really htink any one person is going to go into that office and fundamentally change the government

unless yous are actually talking about violent revolution which almost always fails and usually worsen the situations, all democratic options are different incarnations of slow change over time. modern democracy is specifically designed to put teh brake on radical change of any kind.

these barnie saunders nuts are the kinds of people who think their feelings are the truth so they invest everything in this really short term kind of change that strips the sanctity of the larger system and fucks over ten generations in the future. not all but alot of them are basically the same as trump supporters in the different costume. if yous can't have a real conversation about policy and how government really works, just dont vote because you dont know shit and you treat this all like a sports event

bernie isn't like that so much but even after he concedes and tells his people to support clinton, a lot of his supporters are just too crazy. this kind of thinking creates a perpetuating cycle of craziness where eventually even the author of the ideology (barnie saunders) is unable to amend it or reign in the people he inspired. this is the same shit that happened with the republican party that led to donald trump. you create a monster by using insane emotional rhetoric that riles people up and then its impossible to shut it down

538 is reporting that in actuality only about 6% of Democrats polled say they will not vote for Clinton, which is far less than said they wouldn't vote for Obama at this point in 08. This election has become the ultimate example of the craziest, most extreme voices completely taking over the stage and making it seem like they are in charge when in fact the huge middle of the road bloc of voters is just not receiving attention.

lol that's not even close to what I am saying but like usual there is probably no way to dumb it down enough for you to understand

when she wins I think you should suck my dick

my point is that it's totally normal for the underdog to overtake the clear frontrunner at certain points in the race, but when you analyze polls at a macro level with an understanding of how they have played out in the past, her early lead shows us what is most likely to happen in november. She's probably gonna win, and it's probably not going to be within a percentage point, it will be a clear victory. Electorally, she is going to clean up. if you are interested in learning how guys like nate silver and co. actually study polls and make predictions, you should go read a book about political poll statistics.

I've been waiting for the Dictatorship of the Proletariat since I was 18, but if we're gonna do this shit, we do it right. Bernie is all like we can have a gentle intellectual revolution xoxo <3, but we need someone who is more I come not to bring peace but the sword

it's like you are incapable of understanding anything that doesn't have an immediate black and white answer.

i'm not your fucking professor and I'm not getting paid to try and teach some little contrarian shit who wants to be class asshat instead of learning. go educate yourself. and when clinton wins, you can suck my dick or cock, your choice.

don't the two finalists always go back and forth in the polls? if i recal correctly there is usually a point in october around which if one candidate is too far behind though it becomes impossible to catch up. look how obama took off after mccain's palin bump in that chart up there. I think if you look at the same thing for obama romney, you would see something similar. back and forth but usually the person with the advantage takes off in the last few weeks

lol that's not even close to what I am saying but like usual there is probably no way to dumb it down enough for you to understand

when she wins I think you should suck my dick

my point is that it's totally normal for the underdog to overtake the clear frontrunner at certain points in the race, but when you analyze polls at a macro level with an understanding of how they have played out in the past, her early lead shows us what is most likely to happen in november. She's probably gonna win, and it's probably not going to be within a percentage point, it will be a clear victory. Electorally, she is going to clean up. if you are interested in learning how guys like nate silver and co. actually study polls and make predictions, you should go read a book about political poll statistics.

You ignore the evidence of tampering, why? Only way she wins is if she continues to get the help of the DNC and the Neo-Con's to steal it for her.

But hey, you being oblivious to the nakedness of these leaders is your m.o.

Virginia’s party boy-turned-governor Terry McAuliffe, a longtime friend and confidant of the Clintons, is being investigated by the FBI and Department of Justice for potentially taking illegal campaign contributions.

A very simply worded and basic analysis (maybe even simple enough for the two most prolific boarders in this thread) of what is happening in the polls right now, complete with explanations as to how Trump's sudden surge is pretty standard and predictable and is not necessarily indicative of an American public suddenly deciding they want to elect this motherfucker.