Abstract

Neoplastic infiltration of the extraocular muscle (EOM) is a rare condition which can pose a diagnostic dilemma due to its rarity and overlapping ultrasonographic features with orbital myositis. The ultrasonographic features of neoplastic enlargement of EOM have not been systematically studied and previously have been described in only a few case reports. Orbital ultrasonography, in conjunction with the pattern of ocular misalignment, was assessed for its potential role in identifying patients with neoplastic EOM enlargement. Retrospective chart review of patients with neoplasm and myositis. The clinical features of 8 patients with neoplastic infiltration of the EOM were compared to 15 patients with myositis. In the neoplastic group the width of the EOM was (10.5 mm) almost twice the normal width of the muscle with myositis (p < 0.001). All the muscles in the neoplastic category were low to medium reflective. Paretic deviation was seen in 4/8(50%), purely restrictive in 2/8 (25%) and combined pattern in 2/8 (25%) were noted. In the myositis group the average EOM enlargement was 5.8 mm and all muscles showed low reflectivity. Although ultrasonographic features overlapped between the 2 groups paretic deviations were more common in the neoplastic group versus the myositis group (50% versus 7%). Neoplastic muscle enlargement tends to be larger with paretic deviations of ocular motility seen clinically. These findings in a patient with EOM enlargement should raise the suspicion of neoplasm as the etiology and further work up should be considered.

title = "Orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of neoplastic extraocular muscle enlargement",

abstract = "Neoplastic infiltration of the extraocular muscle (EOM) is a rare condition which can pose a diagnostic dilemma due to its rarity and overlapping ultrasonographic features with orbital myositis. The ultrasonographic features of neoplastic enlargement of EOM have not been systematically studied and previously have been described in only a few case reports. Orbital ultrasonography, in conjunction with the pattern of ocular misalignment, was assessed for its potential role in identifying patients with neoplastic EOM enlargement. Retrospective chart review of patients with neoplasm and myositis. The clinical features of 8 patients with neoplastic infiltration of the EOM were compared to 15 patients with myositis. In the neoplastic group the width of the EOM was (10.5 mm) almost twice the normal width of the muscle with myositis (p < 0.001). All the muscles in the neoplastic category were low to medium reflective. Paretic deviation was seen in 4/8(50%), purely restrictive in 2/8 (25%) and combined pattern in 2/8 (25%) were noted. In the myositis group the average EOM enlargement was 5.8 mm and all muscles showed low reflectivity. Although ultrasonographic features overlapped between the 2 groups paretic deviations were more common in the neoplastic group versus the myositis group (50% versus 7%). Neoplastic muscle enlargement tends to be larger with paretic deviations of ocular motility seen clinically. These findings in a patient with EOM enlargement should raise the suspicion of neoplasm as the etiology and further work up should be considered.",

N2 - Neoplastic infiltration of the extraocular muscle (EOM) is a rare condition which can pose a diagnostic dilemma due to its rarity and overlapping ultrasonographic features with orbital myositis. The ultrasonographic features of neoplastic enlargement of EOM have not been systematically studied and previously have been described in only a few case reports. Orbital ultrasonography, in conjunction with the pattern of ocular misalignment, was assessed for its potential role in identifying patients with neoplastic EOM enlargement. Retrospective chart review of patients with neoplasm and myositis. The clinical features of 8 patients with neoplastic infiltration of the EOM were compared to 15 patients with myositis. In the neoplastic group the width of the EOM was (10.5 mm) almost twice the normal width of the muscle with myositis (p < 0.001). All the muscles in the neoplastic category were low to medium reflective. Paretic deviation was seen in 4/8(50%), purely restrictive in 2/8 (25%) and combined pattern in 2/8 (25%) were noted. In the myositis group the average EOM enlargement was 5.8 mm and all muscles showed low reflectivity. Although ultrasonographic features overlapped between the 2 groups paretic deviations were more common in the neoplastic group versus the myositis group (50% versus 7%). Neoplastic muscle enlargement tends to be larger with paretic deviations of ocular motility seen clinically. These findings in a patient with EOM enlargement should raise the suspicion of neoplasm as the etiology and further work up should be considered.

AB - Neoplastic infiltration of the extraocular muscle (EOM) is a rare condition which can pose a diagnostic dilemma due to its rarity and overlapping ultrasonographic features with orbital myositis. The ultrasonographic features of neoplastic enlargement of EOM have not been systematically studied and previously have been described in only a few case reports. Orbital ultrasonography, in conjunction with the pattern of ocular misalignment, was assessed for its potential role in identifying patients with neoplastic EOM enlargement. Retrospective chart review of patients with neoplasm and myositis. The clinical features of 8 patients with neoplastic infiltration of the EOM were compared to 15 patients with myositis. In the neoplastic group the width of the EOM was (10.5 mm) almost twice the normal width of the muscle with myositis (p < 0.001). All the muscles in the neoplastic category were low to medium reflective. Paretic deviation was seen in 4/8(50%), purely restrictive in 2/8 (25%) and combined pattern in 2/8 (25%) were noted. In the myositis group the average EOM enlargement was 5.8 mm and all muscles showed low reflectivity. Although ultrasonographic features overlapped between the 2 groups paretic deviations were more common in the neoplastic group versus the myositis group (50% versus 7%). Neoplastic muscle enlargement tends to be larger with paretic deviations of ocular motility seen clinically. These findings in a patient with EOM enlargement should raise the suspicion of neoplasm as the etiology and further work up should be considered.