Recommended Posts

Rarely do admins make solo decisions, very unlikely. Admins usually always ask for second opinions etc. Also requesting another admin to handle your situation is stupid as well. If everyone thought oh this admin has a biased against me I want another admin, reports would never get handled. If you think there is an admin being biased report them, I doubt the rating system would do much anyway.

so if I've been having bad altercations with an admin frequently on the forums, IG, w/e or lets say they're in a rival faction and we're gonna do something in relation to their faction it's stupid to ask for another admin?

so if I've been having bad altercations with an admin frequently on the forums, IG, w/e or lets say they're in a rival faction and we're gonna do something in relation to their faction it's stupid to ask for another admin?

Yeah because admins aren't "biased" and if they were they'd be removed/infracted if someone reported them with evidence.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

There's many downsides to this. Some people just don't like certain admins even if the admin is doing a good job. For example, QueenC would get negative feedback as she already gets so much hate by everyone even though she's a great fucking admin and she does a brilliant job. It won't cut out.

I'd say if you wanna give a feedback, just do it on the thread in OOC section where you appreciate admins for their work. As for a briefly explained feedback, you can always send it to one of the UATs, they'd probably appreciate it as long as you are backing up your feedback with legible evidence.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Yeah because admins aren't "biased" and if they were they'd be removed/infracted if someone reported them with evidence.

lol how would you know if they're gonna be biased or not my guy? I expect decisions to go one way when certain admins accept my reports because of previous altercations, we're all human, they can't help it regardless of how you view them

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Yeah because admins aren't "biased" and if they were they'd be removed/infracted if someone reported them with evidence.

I think that this is an extremely naive statement, there will always be corrupt administrators. Most aren't demoted since there is just no solid evidence of them metagaming and such, a great example of an admin like this would be Destroyed, who was an admin for like a year and was recently kicked out due to a ticket on him with evidence that dated back to last year.

They are like roaches, you see one and you know there's a million others crawling within the walls and cracks.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

The problem with the rating system it's not accurate, we wouldn't have enough people to judge it accurately because of, like previously mentioned in the thread salty or people who just don't really care not giving a correct score.

A solution to this would be to sending a UAT contact in giving us this feedback instead of a voting system? Send it in, little points you want to bring up it allows us to see what the communities views are a lot clear in terms of GAT and even other areas in the server.

Alternatively, you can contact myself or any of the other UAT bringing it up But just for those who don't know, we do have eyes and ears and we can see who is performing and who isn't.

Come n' speak to us about this instead of having a voting system, please n thanks x

Link to post

Share on other sites

The problem with the rating system it's not accurate, we wouldn't have enough people to judge it accurately because of, like previously mentioned in the thread salty or people who just don't really care not giving a correct score.

A solution to this would be to sending a UAT contact in giving us this feedback instead of a voting system? Send it in, little points you want to bring up it allows us to see what the communities views are a lot clear in terms of GAT and even other areas in the server.

Alternatively, you can contact myself or any of the other UAT bringing it up But just for those who don't know, we do have eyes and ears and we can see who is performing and who isn't.

Come n' speak to us about this instead of having a voting system, please n thanks x

Share on other sites

my comment alone got so much backlash, this just shows how unnecessary this whole suggestion itself is.

^This @BremboBG, some of the comments on this thread proves exactly why this system would not work. Besides, if an admin does a horrible job then they get staff reported, if they do a great job then people can pm them letting them know or put it in the appreciation thread.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

What if we don't want to report you but we just want to give feedback on how you could improve where do we go then? The second we PM you you'll take it as an attack, people even get kicked or banned for it

He comes back after unban, makes a dummy report and attempts to have it accepted by his banning admin (there are numerous ways he can do it). The admin does their job, closes the report. User X rates 1 because he wants to take out the old hate on the admin.

This is just one example. There are countless other ones posted above which support the denial of this suggestion.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

spend a month as staff and you'll change your mind about what u just wrote mate.

that's why I don't work in the field on direct customer service. It's your own choice to be an admin so yeah. It's no argument to say "WELL DUH SPEND A DAY IN MY BOOTS". no I don't because I know it's shit.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

that's why I don't work in the field on direct customer service. It's your own choice to be an admin so yeah. It's no argument to say "WELL DUH SPEND A DAY IN MY BOOTS". no I don't because I know it's shit.

not quite where i was going. my comment was regarding you thinking ppl are mature enough to leave a solid feedback after being denied something.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

The problem with the rating system it's not accurate, we wouldn't have enough people to judge it accurately because of, like previously mentioned in the thread salty or people who just don't really care not giving a correct score.

A solution to this would be to sending a UAT contact in giving us this feedback instead of a voting system? Send it in, little points you want to bring up it allows us to see what the communities views are a lot clear in terms of GAT and even other areas in the server.

Alternatively, you can contact myself or any of the other UAT bringing it up But just for those who don't know, we do have eyes and ears and we can see who is performing and who isn't.

Come n' speak to us about this instead of having a voting system, please n thanks x