MOORE MATHS

Tim Blair

–,
Friday,
December,
14,
2012,(12:21pm)

I’m very optimistic about the future, young people. Adelson and all those people will be gone, just like the people who voted for Reagan, the older generation that really was behind Reagan. You know, if were 55 or 60 years old in 1980, when Reagan ran, you’re dead now. They’re not alive, they left. And when they left, you know, things got better. Nothing against – my dad is 91.

So Mike’s dad was 59 when Reagan first ran for President. And he’s not dead.

Things got better when they left because they set up the future for things to be better, Moore should know better.
If his Dad is still alive it is probably because of the way the economy was run under Reagans rule.

Michael Moore - another oxymoronic rich lefty.
Strange how lefties just love money - especially other peoples money - as they decry any conservative who is rich.
Michael Moore’s lakeside house
How do they get away with supposedly having empathy with the poor and downtrodden yet live in splendour themselves?

.... and those who voted for Rooseveldt, Truman, Kennedy, Jimmy Carter - they’re also DEAD.

And now with Obama, it’s the same stinking Democrat Party, the same corruption, the same union feather-bedding, the same politics of envy, the same vote rigging, the same gargantuan debt, the same monumental mismanagement, the ssame politics of smear....

“If you’re not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you’re not a conservative at forty you have no brain.”

Supposed to have been said by Winston Churchill. But it applies to Michael The Moor.

Moore is not only a goose, he is chronically dishonest.
He will run a definitive statement up the flagpole as “fact” and, when he is called on it, he resorts to one of a number of tactics, as follows-
(1) Outright denial that he said what is attributed to him;
(2) If the critic directly points out the source from Moore’s own material, he will say that his statement was “polemic” or “intended as humour”;
(3) His last resort, if criticism persists, is an asymmetrical attack on the critic’s motives or connections, typically that they are “in the pay of big oil/pharma/hamburger/whatever” or “a pawn of Wall Street”

The only time I have seen Moore act was in a TV comedy where he played a slovenly man who visits people’s offices and behaves like an oaf. It was a bit like Sasha Baron Cohen, where an extremely annoying character is injected into real-life situations for laughs.

Cohen had Borat, Ali G and Bruno for variety but Moore was the same slob in all the TV shows and from the trailers, looks to have been the “annoying slob in baseball cap” in all his movies too. From his latest remarks, sounds like Moore has played the character so often he is starting to think he is “annoying slob in baseball cap.”

I really don’t understand how the Leftard brain works. They can preach moderation while climbing aboard their personal helicopters. They can rage against rising seas while buying beachside properties. They can condemn non-Leftard views while claiming to be tolerant.

And here we have some old git preaching to the young that old types are worthless.

yeah, that’s obvious, but there’s nothing easy about understanding that degree of hypocrisy. What’s even harder is trying to understand how so many ordinary and otherwise sane people buy what they’re selling.

Moore simply says what many on the left believe, but won’t admit- that they think everything would be better if everyone that thinks differently is dead.