January 12, 2006

Exploring the house I share for the duration of my sabbatical, I came upon a thin tome in the living room: The Jefferson Bible[ISBN 0-8070-7702-X]. It
caught my eye because Seth Becker, a friend of ours who is a book collector,
had recently shown us a facsimile edition of this book and explained its
origins. I started to read the preface,
and therein found interesting fodder for our continuing attempt to bring order
to information.

The origins of the collection of the Library of Congress is
Thomas Jefferson’s Library, 6000 books which he offered for sale to the United
States for $23,999 in the aftermath of the burning of its predecessor in the
War of 1812. According to F. Forrester
Church, in his forward to The Jefferson
Bible, Jefferson’s scheme of
classification for his books was derived from Bacon’s 1605 essay now known as
The Advancement of Learning.

In light of the schismatic nature of current American
politics, it is somewhat reassuring to note that these same schisms were prominent
in Jefferson’s day as well. One objection to Jefferson’s offer was made
by the illiberal Massachusetts
congressman Cyrus King:

It might be inferred, from the character of the man who
collected it, and France,
where the collection was made, that the library contained irreligious and
immoral books… in languages that many cannot read, and most ought not.

Those pesky Frenchmen were apparently as disregardful of
American sensibilities then as now. Nice
to see that the verities of history endure. But I digress.

Jefferson’s scheme of
classification was built upon the processes of mind employed upon them:

(1)Memory,
which is applied to factual data, such as “History”

(2)Reason…
which is applied to theoretical investigations, such as “Philosophy”; and

(3)Imagination,
which is applied to innocent pleasures, such as the “Fine Arts.”

His departures from Bacon, if I read Church’s analysis
correctly, had to do with Jefferson’s desire to secularize the catalog… to
understand religious endeavor as subordinate to Reason, and indeed, The
Jefferson Bible was his ambitious exercise in understanding the gospels
themselves as a philosophical and moral system, rather than either the word of
God or as a narrative of superstition.

He did so by the method of cut and paste – literally
razoring passages from four different renditions of the gospels, in Greek,
Latin, French, and English, and pasting them in a blank book. Jefferson’s attempt was simply to identify
the words of Jesus himself, which he judged “as distinguishable as diamonds in
a dunghill”, undistorted by the misinterpretations of others (which is what Jefferson held a good portion of the gospels to be). No wonder they called it the Age of Reason.

postscript: There are many editions of The Jefferson Bible extant. I had some difficulty finding a link with the exact match of the ISBN I had in hand. The link in this post is as close as I could come (Beacon Press, 1989). In this case, the content that I found particularly interesting was the introduction by F. Forrester Church, son of the late Frank Church, Senator of Idaho, and the afterword by Jaroslav Pelikan. The historical context and analysis in these bookends to the actual text of Jefferson is quite interesting, and worth finding. In the preface, Church indicates that it was a custom since 1904 to give a copy of The Jefferson Bible to each new Senator.