“The ‘Domestication’ of Heredity: The Familial Organization of Geneticists at Cambridge University, 1895–1910”

Abstract

In the early years of Mendelism, 1900–1910, William Bateson established a productive research group consisting of women and men studying biology at Cambridge. The empirical evidence they provided through investigating the patterns of hereditary in many different species helped confirm the validity of the Mendelian laws of heredity. What has not previously been well recognized is that owing to the lack of sufficient institutional support, the group primarily relied on domestic resources to carry out their work. Members of the group formed a kind of extended family unit, centered on the Batesons’ home in Grantchester and the grounds of Newnham College. This case illustrates the continuing role that domestic environments played in supporting scientific research in the early 20th century.

Carroll Victoria (2004). “The Natural History of Visiting: Responses to Charles Waterton and Walton Hall”. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34: 31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadarevian Soraya (1996). “Laboratory Science versus Country-House Experiment: The Controversy Between Julius Sachs and Charles Darwin”. British Journal for the History of Science 29: 17–41Google Scholar

Desmond Adrian and Moore James (2001). “Redefining the X Axis: ‘Professionals,’ ‘Amateurs’ and the Making of Mid-Victorian Biology – a Progress Report”. Journal of the History of Biology 34: 3–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[Durham, Beatrice]. September 1895. “At a Conversazione.” The English Illustrated Magazine. London.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1969. “The Genetical Society – The First Fifty Years,” John Jinks (ed.), Fifty Years of Genetics. Proceedings of a Symposium held at the 160th Meeting of the Genetical Society on the 50th Anniversary of its Founding. Edinburgh: Olives and Boyd.Google Scholar

Magnello, M. Eileen. 1999. “The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson’s Career at University College London, Parts 1 and 2.” History of Science 37: 79–106, 123–50.Google Scholar

Saunders, Edith Rebecca. 1907. “Certain Complications Arising in the Cross-Breeding of Stocks.” Royal Horticultural Society. Report of the Third International Conference 1906 on Genetics London: Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Sollas, Igerna. 1909. “Inheritance of Colour and of Supernumerary Mammae in Guinea-Pigs, with a Note on the Occurrence of a Dwarf Form.” W. Bateson, E.R. Saunders, and R.C. Punnett (eds.), Reports to the Evolution Committee. Report 5. London: Royal Society of London, pp. 51–79.Google Scholar