The Oversight and Practice of Oocyte Donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada

Abstract

In vitro fertilization using donated oocytes is an important medical technique that provides the only option for some infertile patients to have children. The technique remains ethically contentious, however, and, as a result of this controversy, different oversight approaches have been developed in countries around the world. This paper examines the oversight and practice of oocyte donation in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States to examine how policy choices have influenced the development and use of this medical technology. Examining per capita utilization of oocyte donation in these three countries provides evidence that supply-side policies—specifically policies affecting the compensation of potential oocyte donors—have substantially influenced the use of this technology. These results should provide useful insight for policymakers developing or revising oocyte donation policies.

Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society (1986). Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility,46(3 Suppl 1), 1S–94S.Google Scholar

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2007). Financial compensation of oocyte donors. Fertility and Sterility,88(2), 305–309. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.104.

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2009). Interests, obligations, and rights of the donor in gamete donation. Fertility and Sterility,91(1), 22–27. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.062.

Hope, J. (2006, January 11). Rethink on IVF: Millions spent on multiple births could be used to help more childless couples, say doctors. Daily Mail, p. 35.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2005). Seed report: A report on the human fertilisation and embryology authority’s review of sperm, egg and embryo donation in the united kingdom. London: HFEA.Google Scholar

McLaren, A. (1990). Research on the human conceptus and its regulation in Britain today. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,83(4), 209–213.Google Scholar

Medical Research International, & Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (1989). In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in the United States: 1987 results from the national IVF-ET registry. Fertility and Sterility,51(1), 13–19.Google Scholar