Thursday, June 28, 2018

Inside the Eye - Live! - Prime Time 2018.06.28

Dennis Fetcho, aka "The Fetch", is an American ex-patriot living in Amman, Jordan. He is the author of the Illuminatus Observor, a blog regarded by many as simply the finest Hermetic Qaballa blog in all of blogdom. The Fetch also has a second site called "Inside The Eye - Live!"

16 comments:

It’s too bad Fetcho was more interested in flogging his own prejudices and hijacking the interview than in focusing on my book and US foreign policy. I refused to buy into his lazy, all-purpose label of “Jewish,” and indulge his digressions, and this is what he calls “bad arguments.” Pathetic!

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet. "The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

WELLS, H. G. 20th century British writer "Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people." (The Anatomy of Frustration)

DERSHOWITZ. ALAN - "People say Jews are too powerful, we're too strong, we're too rich, we control the media...we have too much of this, too much of that. And we, apologetically, deny our strength, deny our power. Don't do that. Don't do that. We have earned the right to influence public policy."

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25 "The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom."

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921 "Jews have always controlled the business . . . The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada . . . is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind."

FETCH - When we look at the policies of Jewish groups out there, we have a very clear support for Islam, Muslim immigration into Western nations. They (Jews and Muslims) don't seem to be enemies. They seem to be allies targeting the Western nations here. But Christian Zionists don't seem to be standing up, I guess at all. A majority of Christians are not even standing up for their own national interests. How much are you equating that to Jewish control of media. That is part of the occupation, I would have to assume?

Greg Felton - 16:32 into the InterviewWell, I would caution the use of the word "Jewish", because that gets a little extreme.

Greg lost the interview, right there. Greg's presentation digressed to a bullshit expression of political correct nonsense, that tried to button hole the discussion into his very narrow (and rather idiotic) use of language.

He says he doesn't want to get into "what is Jewish". He frets over being called an "antisemite".

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 - November 1, 1937 "In 1848 the word "anti-Semitic" was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word "Jew." The right word for them is "Jew" . . . "I implore all of you to be accurate—call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat—that is your reward."

I didn't put you on the show to listen to your pseudo-intellectual nonsense about what is and is not a Jew and how we can or can't use our own language to shed light on what is a very real and present danger to the United States and Western civilization at large.

Further, your insult towards the host (and the audience) was not missed, and your comments here very well support that your commentary held within in it a contempt for the host and the audience. Seeing how this is so, your attempt at some superior pseudo-intellectualism more that "justifies" the tone and direction the interview went.

Your attempt to deflect from reality is intellectually dishonest or simply naivite bordering on stupidity.

Still waiting to hear some criticism of Islam/muslims, incompatibility of cultures, possible jewish origins of Saudi fambly. However, I won't be holding my breath. It seems to me that you only want to present 1/2 of the problem. Jews and Muslims both present a dire threat to western culture, albeit in totally different ways.

BTW: RALPH WALDO EMERSON was a flaming homosexual. HG Wells was a Fabian Society member and a supporter of world government.

Yet their statements about Jews holds. And there are thousands and thousands of quotes and historical evidence about Jews that Greg absolutely tried to sweep under the table. The Muslim problem solves rapidly if you take out the Jewish problem.

Islamic civilization has nothing technologically that can threaten the West, nor do they have human capital capable of competing.

End the ability of them to reside in your country just as they do not allow us to reside in theirs and your problem is solved. As we say in the business world - TARGET THE DECISION makers - Jews.

You can divide your attention all you want. That is your business.

In the mean time, the case of Greg Felton is pretty clear now. He tried the same bullshit on the Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show. A guy with an inflammatory title like "The Host and the Parasite" would be expected to grasp the degree of Jewish subversion of the West. We would not be expecting him to come to the aid of Jewish power at the very first breath f speaking about Jews.

Just because a flaming homosexual made an off hand comment about jews, it doesn't validate his position. Maybe you should try quoting some of the steamy love letters he wrote to his various male lovers. Don't they execute homosexuals in Saudi Arabia? As for Wells, anyone who believes in world government can't exactly be an enemy of the tribe since that's been their pet project for 100's of years.

I never said that the threat Islam makes towards the west was 'technological' but I think you already know that.

Not all of the 'decision makers' are jews. Take the new mayor of London for example. He wants to bring millions of more muslims over there. Is that the work of the Jews? obviously not. I could post countless other examples but I simply don't have time.

If you want to accuse me of 'dividing the attention' then that's your business. (I already know you like to get insulting when confronted with a disagreement). My political understand has gone beyond 'it's the jews and only the jews', although we are certainly in agreement that their power constitutes a threat to western civilization and the world in general. You simply can't blame all of the bad behavior muslims exhibit in Europe on the Jews, and it's beyond naive to believe that the problem will somehow magically 'solve itself' once jewish power is 'taken' out. Sharia law and women walking around with a bed sheet over their head simply isn't compatible with western society. Obviously, you don't want them to restrict our ability to live in Muslim countries, since you yourself live in one and have for many years.

As for Greg Felton, I am not defending him. I an only pointing out your mono-focal view of the world. I will say however, that it's possible for someone to have a legitimate viewpoint without focusing on jews although they are obviously missing a big piece of the puzzle. I don't think any of us have all of the puzzle pieces put together sine most of the power structure is occulted.

The problem with Islam is that it is being allowed into our countries. That is not the fault of Islam, it is the fault of political leadership, which is largely based on Jewish leadership, and you know that.

The current political elite DOES NOT GET INTO POWER without Jewish approval, by and large, although that is slowly changing as Jewish policies have wreaked havoc on the West. Italy is an example. Hungary and Poland are others.

Saddiq Khan is a mayor of a city. Contrary to popular belief, mayors do not ever control immigration policy of nations. Whatever he "wants" is irrelevant to the actually immigration policy of a nation.

Regarding Wells. So on one hand you are saying he had access to Jewish circles and on the other hand you want to dismiss his statements out of hand because he was a homosexual? .

Regarding Saudi Arabia. No. They don't execute homosexuals. There is political effort to do so, but there is very little public support. Open secret: Saudi Arabia has a large number of homosexuals/bi. Sexual segregation perhaps creates needs for out of the norm sexual intimacy? Who knows.

Truth be told, Greg brought NOTHING to the table that I am not already aware, and in some issues, I don't even agree with the guy. However, his lecture to me of a very old and tired line that "we can't use the word 'Jew'", but we have to use the word "Zionists", is itself far more "monofocal" that focusing on the far larger and complex issues that is encompassed in the word "Jew".

"Jew" provides us an infinite number of permutations to explore. The term "Zionists" is just a very large fragment of an even larger permutation/formula.

Jews don't get upset when you can them "Zionists", but as Greg pointed out, they get quite squirmy when you call them for what they are, "Jews". They may knee jerk and call you an "antisemite", which, parenthetically, Greg seemed quite fearful of being labelled.

I will take a squirming, screaming Jew over a placid poker faced Jew anytime. The former reveals himself in ways that the latter will never do.

You are getting confused, Fetch. I never said Wells was a homo. - lol I can't believe you didn't look into Emmerson's background before cherry-picking a quote from him.No point in discussing things further. You have it all figured out. Jews are to blame for everything. Islam is wonderful.Western civilization has had wars/serious problems with Islam for over 1000 years but never mind that. - lol I don't want to argue with you or have this devolve into a pissing match. At least we agree on some things.Cheers.

Dude - won't don't you get. Islam has traditionally been separated from the West and is adhered to by over 1.3 billion people. The ability of Islam to infiltrate the West is not brought about by Islam. It has been brought about by Jews (who are an alien race in our midst) and their "rectified Goy" - which you can call traitors.

The history of Jewish subversion of the West vis a vis changes in immigration policy is so well know that it amazes me that you are so confused here.

And to add further to your genius, it is Jews who are behind the Clash of Civilizations, which means more White people get to die for Jews and their views as Western men and women are sent off to fight yet more wars against Islam while Jews flood the internal walls with the worst of Islam which then ends up in the rape and pillage of the home front.

Yes, you will defend Islam to your dying breath. Got it. Thanks.I tried end my last message with a conciliatory tone, but you prefer to fight on.

"Dude - won't don't you get" - lol,

You have now, once again, entered into the realm of intellectual dishonesty, and you have knowingly misrepresented my position. You are trying to make it sound like I am oblivious to the Jewish problem when I have repeatedly stated otherwise.

Even a cursory look at European history will prove your position to be incorrect regarding Islam and western culture.I guess it's the Jews making Muslims build mosques all over Europe and AMerikwa and making them demand Sharia law as well. It's the Jews making them rape beautiful white women because they've never seen a woman who wasn't fully covered from head to toe. Islamic governments could forbid their citizens from immigrating to the west if they so chose.

Mind you, I have plenty of respect for Islam and support any people's right to live the way they choose.The thing is, I don't want to live around it. It's a lifestyle choice. - lol

You enjoy fighting and being rude to people who disagree with you, but that's part of your act. I have nothing more to say. Make sure your final response is full of insults and zingers, that way 'you win' - lol.

When was the last the time Europeans had to wage war on their own continent against Islam? And of those wars (like Spain), how much of this was brought about because Jews opened the gates (which they certainly did in Spain)?

The West has been fighting Jew wars for so long they have been reduced from 33% of global population to less than 8%, and you want to focus on peripheral issues like "Muzzies" instead of the core infiltration?