Fraud Number 1: MARSHALL

As BB's idiots keep diverting debate to my person, instead of adressing
RM issues I pointed out...I will begin quoting some of their posts to
demonstrate their incoherence, ignorance or both...I will let the
people judge for themselves...

An example of Marshall *enlightenning* ideas

BEGIN

//Marshall declares// --> (he responds to a post made where I claim
that SQL projected are nothing but bidimensional OR tridimensional at
PHYSICAL LEVEL/)
<< No, I don't think that's correct at all. Physical memory is
> unidimensional;>>

//Me//
> Please explain your point. -->Gave him a chance to explain (maybe did not get it?)

//Marshall declares// --> persists and signs on ignorance...
You keep saying that physical representation is two
dimensional. But that's not correct. Physical memory
is one dimensional; it is a single line of memory from
address 0 to address n.

As you can see above, this ignorant obviously confuses CPU adressing
scheme and memory adressing scheme that are bidimensional or
tridimensional
(RowAdress/ColumnAdress or RowAdress/ColumnAdress)...

He totally ignores the memory architecture of physical RAM memory at
memory controller level which does not prevent from pretending he
knows.

He even persists and signs that on physical level a you have to deal
with column store and row store which are logical constructs of how
data is projected from a relvar which do not say anything about they
are represented *physically* in memory...

So I ask what's more physical then adressing schemes of
banks/row/adresses who precisely represent data from SQL projections in
memory ?
Received on Sat Jun 17 2006 - 21:36:25 CEST