Entries in Clear and Present Danger
(20)

Just before America's First Czar was sworn in twice, the Neo Marxist Obama issued an order for his Goon Squads, Trolls and other inane and mindless drones to go forth and multiply and pretend that the entire USA was a suburb of South Chicago. He did so in a video. Not to give the video site any hits, I have obtained the audio and present it here:

The Czar-Select Announces and Commissions His Brown Shirts

The purpose of this article is to draw attention to all of the articles on this subject of Obama's Civilian National Security Forces.National. In part, this is what the would be Czar stated in July of 2008:

Obama let this slip out and the media was silent

I first heard of this six days after he first uttered these ominous words and there I started watching this cretin like a hawk and sent audio clips and pieces of articels to the media in the hopes they would start talking about the portents portrayed and presented for all to see. The media was silent. Now, and only now that the legislation authoriziing the Obama Brown Shirts called HR 1388, it is only now that the media is starting to talk about this. There is nothing like closing the barn doors after the horses got out.

I will repost my article dated 19 MAR 2009 entiltled, "The Czambi Yoots Corp Is Here!". There is no respect offered for this Neo Marxist upstart Obama because there is no respect earned. Everything he stood for, stands for and presentds to the American People cannot be reconciled with the United States Constitution. He once said that the Constitution was flawed and didn't go far enough to give the federal government enough power to "take care of the people". Therein he reveals his ignorance and stupidity. He knows nothing of history and he also must hate the provisions for States Rights. His hero is Abraham Lincoln that could have stopped the War Between the States and did not...much like Obama is doing now. So, without further ado, I present the article promised and via "updates" to this article, I will repost every single article I have written on this subject since 08 JUL 2008.

Yes indeed. This BHR, Black Helicopter Republican, has been spouting off about this issue since I fist heard about it in early July of 2008. Every article I wrote about this subject is right here. Have a nut. By the way, it is now REAL! So, all you Fair Weather Conservatives out there I say this, either drop dead, go to hell or bite me.

This was passed in the House 321 to 105. There are 321 Neo Marxists in the House and need to be removed from the House and make it illegal for them to ever hold a Public Service job for the rest of their lives.

(a) General Purpose- The purpose of the Commission is to gather and analyze information in order to make recommendations to Congress to--

(1) improve the ability of individuals in the United States to serve others and, by doing so, to enhance our Nation and the global community;

(2) train leaders in public service organizations to better utilize individuals committed to national service and volunteerism as they manage human and fiscal resources;

(3) identify and offer solutions to the barriers that make it difficult for some individuals in the United States to volunteer or perform national service; and

(4) build on the foundation of service and volunteer opportunities that are currently available.

(b) Specific Topics- In carrying out its general purpose under subsection (a), the Commission shall address and analyze the following specific topics:

(1) The level of understanding about the current Federal, State, and local volunteer programs and opportunities for service among individuals in the United States.

(2) The issues that deter volunteerism and national service, particularly among young people, and how the identified issues can be overcome.

(3) Whether there is an appropriate role for Federal, State, and local governments in overcoming the issues that deter volunteerism and national service and, if appropriate, how to expand the relationships and partnerships between different levels of government in promoting volunteerism and national service.

(4) Whether existing databases are effective in matching community needs to would-be volunteers and service providers.

(5) The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service.

(6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.

(7) The need for a public service academy, a 4-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders.

(8) The means to develop awareness of national service and volunteer opportunities at a young age by creating, expanding, and promoting service options for elementary and secondary school students, through service learning or other means, and by raising awareness of existing incentives.

(9) The effectiveness of establishing a training program on college campuses to recruit and educate college students for national service.

(10) The effect on United States diplomacy and foreign policy interests of expanding service opportunities abroad, such as the Peace Corps, and the degree of need and capacity abroad for an expansion.

(11) The constraints that service providers, nonprofit organizations, and State and local agencies face in utilizing federally funded volunteer programs, and how these constraints can be overcome.

(12) Whether current Federal volunteer programs are suited to address the special skills and needs of senior volunteers, and if not, how these programs can be improved such that the Federal Government can effectively promote service among the `baby boomer' generation.

(c) Methodology-

(1) PUBLIC HEARINGS- The Commission shall conduct public hearings in various locations around the United States.

(2) REGULAR AND FREQUENT CONSULTATION- The Commission shall regularly and frequently consult with an advisory panel of Members of Congress appointed for such purpose by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the majority leader of the Senate.

Last I knew, MANDATORY labor went out when slavery was outlawed.

At one point, Section 120 had some similar language but has since been amended so I have not included the verbiage here.

If that wasn't bad enough, the Senate is also considering similar Civilian Army Recruiting legislation.

S 3487: A bill to amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to expand and improve opportunities for service, and for other purposes.

You always have to watch out for that "and for other purposes" bit. That's where the unconstitutional CONgress Critters sneak in their unconstitutional crap on top of the already unconstitutional pretenses.

Damn. Thank God - D'OH! I mean (g)od - don't want to damage the sensitivities of those moron libtard moonbat fruit loop brigades - that Al Goreacle, the Global Warming Myth Fraud for inventing the internet that he denied and then Pelosi reaffirmed. That way, I could store a BUNCH of stuff for a rainy day via my Google Reader (the enemy camp). It just so happens that we got several inches of rain recently - like YESTERDAY - and I couldn't help but recall how John McCain was raked over the coals for making the claim that Obama was talking to HAMAS.

John McCain dropped the issue all in the name of High Road Politics and I can only surmise that he didn't want to be classified as a racist. Well, Obama is the #1 racist in the Nation today and he is also a pathological liar. I know - I am being mean-spirited because I am revealing Truth. SIGH.

Remember that headline at the Huff and Puff? I do. And I dragged it out of retirement just for this post. Oh. Darn. The libtard moonbat fruit loop brigade members will be a little tweaked about this but, that is what I like about blogging the most...driving the libtards more libtardier.

However, a little foreground before the background.

Recently, the illegal alien Marxist Obama went to the White House to speak confidentially with President Bush. Apparently, Obama doesn't respect anything in confidence. He was with President Bush alone...no aids...no aides...just a man (GWB) and a boy (BHO). Some how, the confidential chat "leaked out". I can only surmise that Barry has the inability to store data so it has this trickle down aversion and he cannot hold down a thought for very long.

First he whined about the meeting. Pat Dollard says that the "Bushes Meet Natural Born Muslim And His Husband"...not sure what that means but I thought to throw it into the mix. Then, Barry's cocaine brain sprung a leak and now GWB and the rest of the world now know that Barry cannot keep secrets or anything close in when it is understood that confidentiality does actually mean something. Makes me wonder about all these CIA Briefings and National Security Briefings the fool is getting. Nothing like telling an illegal alien with terrorist attachments State Secrets. DAMN! I mean, D.A.M.N.!

By divulging the content of his private conversation with Bush, Barack Obama has just demonstrated to world leaders that he cannot be trusted with confidential information. So much for Obama personal diplomacy as an asset, if not a cure all, for America’s pressing international problems. I cannot imagine any savvy politician ignoring the lesson or not advised by his advisers to remember it well. [...]

Barack will be a GREAT disinformation and misinformation tool in the years to come. No wonder he didn't conduct any committee meetings. Anyway...back to HAMAS.

In an interview published Tuesday in the London-based Al-Hayat, Dr. Ahmad Yousef, political adviser to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, said senior Hamas figures had held a secret meeting with advisers to Barack Obama in Gaza before the U.S. elections.

Throughout his campaign Obama’s official line was that he would “only talk with Hamas if it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and agrees to abide by past agreements.”

Yet Damascus-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal responded to Obama’s win on an optimistic note, telling Australia’s Sky News on Saturday that his organization was “ready for dialogue with President Obama and with the new American administration with an open mind.”

For those who don’t want America to have dealings with an Islamist terror organization like Hamas, that may have sounded reassuring. But now it seems it may be too soon to feel reassured.

According to Yousef in the Al-Hayat interview, the Obama-Hamas talks were already ongoing during the U.S. election campaign: “We were in contact with a number of Obama’s aides through the Internet, and later met with some of them in Gaza, but they advised us not to reveal this information as it may influence the elections or become manipulated by McCain’s campaign.” [...]

Six months ago Obama's foreign-policy adviser, Robert Malley, resigned from the campaign. The resignation was due to Times of London reporting that Malley had been meeting privately with Hamas leaders on a regular basis - something that Obama had publicly pledged not to do.

Two Israeli newspapers print the claim from Hamas today that Barack Obama’s team met with the terrorist group before the elections. The Jerusalem Post and Ha’aretz both report that Hamas says it met with Obama advisers in the Gaza Strip before last Tuesday’s elections, after first having made connections via the Internet: [...]

Ahmad Yousef, political advisor to the Hamas government in Gaza, has said that advisors to U.S. president-elect Barack Obama have met secretly in Gaza with senior Hamas officials.

Source: Al-Hayat, London, November 11, 2008

Democrats and terrorists ladies and gentlemen...democrats and terrorists. Two peas in a pod with the same motivation and end game. Can't hardly tell which one is listening or talking to whom or which one is negotiating with whom or which one is dictating to whom.

News services in Israel are on fire with talk that Barack Obama has just sent a supporter of the terror group Hamas as his envoy to Syria and Egypt to relay news of his policies to come. Last September Israel's suspicions were heated up about "former" Obama advisor Robert Malley being sent to Syria with a George Soros funded group. It was then claimed by Egyptian sources that Malley was still working as an advance man for Obama which angered Israelis because six months earlier Malley announced that he had held "regular meetings" with Hamas. At that time, Malley's comment caused the Obama camp to hurriedly distance the candidate from any connection with Malley. But, with the election over, it seems that Obama's claims that Malley didn't really work for him are not quite true. It also seems that we already have the very first example of Obama sticking his finger in the eye of our allies in Israel. Naturally, the U.S. press is not reporting this news. [...]

In conjunction with the above, Czarbie the Fraud is "exploring a new approach" in the GWOT. He is going to get Iran involved. Um...they already ARE involved you moron! They are supplying troops and arms to the ENEMY you complete blithering IDIOT!

Iran is testing nukes under ground and test firing long range missiles on the border of Iraq and Czarbie the Illegal Alien Marxist wants to cozy up to Iran and "get them involved". Judas H Priest people. Maybe he just wants to get his mitts on those secrets Pakistan just found on the strengths of the Taliban and give them to Iran for exchange of no nukes ... maybe not. Maybe is it just the confirmed reason why the "agricultural plant" in Syria was hit that inspires the Czarbie to consort with our enemies and his friends.

In a previous post here, I made mention of the post by JB Williams located here. This is the start of that post.

The 2008 presidential campaign of Barack Obama is a case of truth being stranger than fiction and conspiracy being more than just theory. Hollywood couldn’t write a more intriguing script of crime, corruption, deceit, cover-ups and international intrigue. Obama’s cultish grip on his young ill-educated minions makes Jim Jones and David Koresh look like beginners. [...]

Awhile ago, the socialist power structure in America quietly decided that revolution was out, and that taking over and establishing a socialist dictatorship from within, was in. Bill Ayers was not really talking about the past when he said about his days as a Leftist terrorist, an IED bomber of Americans, that he wished he’d “done more”. He was really signaling that he wasn’t finished since his work thus far had failed. He was going to do more, much more. He was putting his energy into setting up a socialist dictatorship ala Fidel Castro in America, and Barack Obama was both his stalking horse and his candidate. The first proponent of the “working from within” strategy was none other than William Ayers himself. [...]

Now, go read the List of 45 and see if you cannot connect the dots and get over your idiocy about McCain. I did because there is a huge threat before us.

JB Williams (whom I used to post to before he vanished) has a great article up at Canada Free Press entitled, "Campaign (or) Coup d’état The Obamessiah Movement". It is a must read for everything you need to know about the attempted Marxist take-over from withing of our Federal Republic that morons refer to as a Democracy.

[...] A sudden and decisive action in politics, especially one resulting in a drastic change of government illegally, or by force, is a Coup d’Ètat.

It’s important to recognize the difference between a “legal” honest, open Democratic campaign for “change” and a corrupt coup d’Ètat. A campaign offers voters an honest unfettered look at their options and does nothing to trick, con, threaten, intimidate, defraud or force voters into dramatic “change” completely at odds with all conventional precepts.

Obama has not run an open, honest campaign. Far from it! He is running the clock out on his coup d’Ètat. [...] Go read the rest

The racists of the Obama Camp say the White Folk shouldn't be allowed to vote anymore.Why is it that white people need to be denied the vote? Why, because they're racist, of course! But hey, the idiot pundit calling for this is white, so therefore it's OK. [...]World Government to Reign in "Fascist" America?

Richard Falk, who justly earned his way into David Horowitz's book The Professors as one of the "101 Most Dangerous Academics in America," now lectures more august audiences at the United Nations. Appointed as the United Nations Human Rights Council to serve as its special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories in March, Falk has in a matter of months lived down to his opponents' worst expectations.

In addition to The Professors, Falk should be added to a list of the most biased anti-Israel UN human rights investigators, not an easy list to make at the UN. He believes Israel, and the United States, are guilty of Nazi-like barbarism, which the United Nations decries even as it dismisses investigations into North Korea and Cuba. Falk would abolish the alleged democratic atrocities by establishing a "world government" in which foreigners could overturn U.S. policies through "binding referenda."

Falk not only hates Israel but his own country. Falk has accused the United States of imperialism, Nazi-like tendencies, and possibly manufacturing the official story-line for what happened on 9/11. He has referred to the nation in recent years as slipping toward "fascism." Falk views the democratically elected governments of the United States as no better than the world's most notorious dictatorships.

He has a plan to make sure Nazism never breaks out again: allowing foreigners to veto the American voter. [...]

With Obama more and more frequently adopting the tactics of the Jihadis, I find it interesting that the silly ones that think Obama will be good for the Nation in the long run think folks should take them seriously about anything.

Obama assumes that Islamic terrorism is driven by despair, poverty, inflammatory US policy and the American presence on Muslim soil in the Persian Gulf. Thus he adopts the agenda of the Islamists themselves.

No doubt. But, that's OK. The American People are catching on. I see it every day out on the streets unlike the pollsters that just look at numbers and have no earthly idea what the man on the street is saying and thinking. That is why the Obama Camp is worried and is counting on the Eeyores to bring them to victory. Obama cannot win without them.

Barack Insane Nobama said he hates Fox News. Well, maybe not in those exact words but he is feeding his faux patriots. Did I say faux patriots? Why, yes I did. I'm sorry. I meant to say fraud patriots. There. That's better.

Perhaps it is due to the fact that the only dinosaur media that actually does report on His Marxism Obama is Fox News. I failed to view the Special Report last week but I have another chance this evening. Dr Sanity reminds us all that Fax News will be having the Special Report several times this weekend. Don't forget to watch. I will be recording it to gather sound bites for my BTR presentations in the weeks ahead.

WATCH THE SPECIAL REPORT ON OBAMA'S ASSOCIATIONS ON FOX TONIGHT

Stanley Kurtz announces the following, (and I pass it around): FOX News is going to be airing a special report this weekend on Barack Obama’s background, associations, etc. I did a long taped interview for the show, and I expect that parts of it will be used. The report is scheduled to air today (Saturday) at 9PM ET, Sunday at 5AM ET, and again on Sunday at 2PM ET. [...]

Do not fail to view this Special Report. What is the incentive to watch it and take notes? The Messiah doesn't want you to and he will use force against you in order to squelch your knowledge of his attempt to invalidate our Constitution should he occupy the White House.

[...] “At least in Europe, the Socialist leaders who so admire my opponent are upfront about their objectives. They use real numbers and honest language. And we should demand equal candor from Sen. Obama. Raising taxes on some in order to give checks to others is not a tax cut; it’s just another government giveaway.” [...]

[...] A socialist is a socialist, regardless of nationality and race and culture and any American who believes their great country is immune to the consequences of electing one to the White House is a fool. Stop Obama, here and now and begin the work to roll back the scummy tide that brought him this far. [END]

A Republican congresswoman from Minnesota said Friday that some of Senator Barack Obama's associations raise the possibility that he has "anti-American views."

May have? MAY HAVE?? When anyone asks the Justice Department to use its power to shut down opposition in any shape or form, that individual or group violates the very Constitution that they have said they are bound by Oath to protect and SERVE. The would-be First Czar, the wanna-be Trotsky, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, has done such a thing. Is this a sign of a True American Patriot? Not hardly. Barack is a Traitor to the United States Constitution, plain and simple. (more of this at Memeorandum)

Barack Obama’s campaign asked the U.S. Justice Department to expand a special prosecutor’s investigation to include possible improprieties surrounding reports the FBI is looking into voter fraud in the presidential race.Obama’s campaign attorney said the investigation should look into a leak to the news media that the FBI is probing allegations of voter registration fraud by a grassroots organization called ACORN. The group’s activities were denounced by Republican nominee John McCain in the Oct. 15 presidential debate. [...]

[...] Maybe when he becomes Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler he can have Joe the Plumber retroactively prosecuted for a hate crime for daring to speak in his presence. [...]

I have been warning of this for decades people and I have also been saying that Barack is indeed a Marxist for at least 4 years. I am glad people are finally catching on. John McCain had this to say about the Fraud Obama: (emphasis mine)

ARLINGTON, VA — Today, McCain-Palin 2008 Spokesman Ben Porritt issued the following statement in response to the Obama campaign’s letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey:“After a week of shifting stories and clumsy corrections regarding Barack Obama’s connections to ACORN, the Obama campaign resorted to their now-customary heavy handed tactic of attempting to criminalize political discourse. Today’s outrageous letter to Attorney General Mukasey and Special Prosecutor Dannehy at the Justice Department asking for a special prosecutor to investigate Senator McCain and Governor Palin’s public statements about ACORN’s record of fraudulent voter registrations (including in this week’s Presidential debate) is absurd. It is a typical time-worn Washington attempt to criminalize political differences. For someone who promises ‘change,’ it is certainly only more of the same. “The letter’s request that the Department of Justice investigate ‘recent partisan Republican activities throughout the country’ is almost a parody of the Obama campaign’s attempt to intimidate their political opponents. In case Sen. Obama’s lawyer did not notice, we are in the midst of a political campaign, not a coronation, and the alleged criminal activity he calls ‘recent partisan Republican activities’ are what the rest of us call campaign speeches and debates. All of this is unfortunately reminiscent of the Obama campaign’s recent creation of a ‘truth squad’ of Missouri prosecutors and sheriffs to ‘target’ people who criticize Sen. Obama. Rest assured that, despite these threats, the McCain-Palin campaign will continue to address the serious issue of voter registration fraud by ACORN and other partisan groups, and compliance by states with the Help America Vote Act’s requirement of matching new voter registrations with state data bases to prevent voter fraud.”

Hello? Are you listening America? Or, should that be Amerika? Screw Obama and his Truth Goons and criminal-political hacks. There is a fairly decent article here you might find interesting.

World New Daily asks: "Is Obama socialist?" The answer is yes, naturally. However, Henry Lamb presents solidifying data. With Obama wanting to change the world and all, who else has tried and stated the same? The names, Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Mau and Osama come to mind. They have all failed. Perhaps Czarbie seems to think he will succeed. Talk about a Clear and Present Danger. As a reminder, please view this video. It is Michelle Obama in all of her hateful and socialist self, presented by Glen Beck, hat tip to ARRA.

Donald Douglas has the video up of Rep Bachmann where she goes on and explains how much Obama is not a pro-American candidate (my words not hers) and what dangers to freedom he represents. Chris Matthews has issues with that.

[...] It's best to watch the whole interview to see Chris Matthews trying to pin down Bachmann to name names of anti-American legislators in Congress (and there's certainly a few).But I'll say right now, though, frankly, Bachmann nails it: She singles out Barack Obama's radical associates one by one: William Ayers, Michael Pfleger, and Jeremiah Wright and tells it like it is. These folks by word and deed can't stand America? Obama himself has gone through a life of ideological contortions and scheming political machinations to get where he is today, which is in hot water for admitting he wants to take the private property of everyday Americans and "spread the wealth." [...]

SPOT ON! I have also been opining about the Anti-Americanists for decades. I know what they sound like. I know what they smell like and I know what they look like. It isn't all that difficult. Naturally, the "progressives" have taken their marching orders from the trouser worshipers of one Soros.

The Obamatards are running scared because their Messiah goofed and openly admitted that the era of Freedom will soon end if he manages to successfully steal the election via his Campaign Arm in ACORN. I will end this epistle with the following from a special place: these will be excerpts because the entire piece is 40 paragraphs or so...

[...] The American soviet government will take firm possession of the commanding heights of your business system: the banks, the key industries and the transportation and communication systems. It will then give the farmers, the small tradespeople and businessmen a good long time to think things over and see how well the nationalized section of industry is working. [...]

[...] Even the intensity and devotion of religious sentiment in America will not prove an obstacle to the revolution. If one assumes the perspective of soviets in America, none of the psychological brakes will prove firm enough to retard the pressure of the social crisis. This has been demonstrated more than once in history. Besides, it should not be forgotten that the Gospels themselves contain some pretty explosive aphorisms. [...]

[...] While the romantic numskulls of Nazi Germany are dreaming of restoring the old race of Europe's Dark Forest to its original purity, or rather its original filth, you Americans, after taking a firm grip on your economic machinery and your culture, will apply genuine scientific methods to the problem of eugenics. Within a century, out of your melting pot of races there will come a new breed of men -- the first worthy of the name of Man. [END]

Be sure to view the List of 45 Videos Series I am collecting. There are only three at the moment but that number will grow as I locate them and link them here.

Listen, we are under attack from within. The media has been indistinguishable from the Democrat party having thrown off any semblance of objective reporting. No negative Obama Biden stories - no investigative journalism on the deep corruption of Obama's ascent and sketchy background and terrible alliances. The massive vote fraud is unfathomable.

The Democrats want their Black president - no matter if his father was more Arab than African. No matter if he grew up on the streets of Indonesia. Nothing matters. [...]

Be sure to check the post out. There is actionable duties thee to perform.

Whereas we cannot distinguish between the "media" and the Democrats, we also cannot distinguish the Democrat Party leadership from terrorists. For instance, in recent days the terrorists have stated that the current financial non-crisis crisis is a victory for them like they had something to do with it. Isn't it just like a democrat to lay claim to something they had nothing to do with? Oh. Wait. Democrats didn't say that. See? One cannot tell the difference between a democrat or a terrorist.

When an enemy of the USA proclaims that they want to see Obama as President, one has to wonder about that one. And while we are at it, when an American Presidential Aspirant tries to lose the war we are in for political gain, shouldn't we question his treasonous actions and his loyalties? Sarah Palin is correct...Obama is indeed unfit to command. When a Presidential Contender says that our Troops are "just air raiding villages and killing civilians", I certainly do question the frauds' motives.

Even Joe Biden knows Czarbie is unqualified and is a liar as well as a proponent of the usual DCN Double Standard. I spit in his face. Every political leader in our nation and many others knows for a fact that Obama was willing to lose the war for political expediency. Not only id he a pathetic anti-Americanist, he is a traitor.

A profoundly important point is being missed in the campaign debate over which candidate was right on Iraq. In 2006, when conditions on the ground were trending downward and a decision was required either to continue the struggle or to cut our losses, Barack Obama stated that the proposed deployment of more forces, the "surge," was doomed to failure and instead called for a phased withdrawal of all forces within a defined period.

In short, Sen. Obama was willing to lose. It was an astonishing display of ignorance to be so cavalier about defeat, almost as if losing a war was tantamount to losing a set of tennis -- something without lasting consequence.

I recall very vividly April 30, 1975, the day we acknowledged defeat in the Vietnam War -- the day Ambassador Graham Martin and others were evacuated ignominiously from the roof of our embassy in Saigon. Only later did it become clear how damaging that defeat was.

There were consequences for all nations, especially small states who are vulnerable to great-power pressures. In the late 1970s it contributed to a greater Russian willingness to take risks and a more aggressive Soviet foreign policy. Indeed, in the years immediately following our defeat in Vietnam, an emboldened Soviet Union established a dominant influence in Angola, Ethiopia, South Yemen, Mozambique, Nicaragua and ultimately invaded Afghanistan with 100,000 troops. [...]

I remember as well. I know first hand what it is like when filthy, dirty, scum politicians turn their backs on the lives of Troops protecting their worthless lives from situations that THEY got us into in the first damn place. Screw Czarbie and his followers and may they rot and burn in hell for the sins and the crimes they have committed against our Troops for their precious and pathetic power grabs.

And now, due to political expediency, as his own son heads of to war, Joe Biden is now balking and doing what he accused Czarbie of doing. What a coward and political hack bastard he is.

Not only is Czarbie unqualified to lead a fart factory, Joe Biden should be ashamed. They disgust me beyond contempt.

I originally wrote this when I was with A Newt One. and that site is no longer running. This is a repost of the same piece.

Many years ago, there came a point in my life when I had to deal with the demons that came to me from time to time once and for all. They still appear from time to time but I know what to say to them now to dispense with their intent to destroy anything they are set out to destroy. And no, I am not talking about some grotesque monster or some sabre-toothed, four-eyed beast-man nor am I referring to some anti-angelic supernatural presence. I am talking about things that cannot be described unless someone has experienced the same events. I am referring to memories triggered by people, places and things beyond my control. I am talking about fighting the “what if” or the “if I had only done this differently” syndrome(s).

Those that have met me don’t really know who I am but yet I sense that they sense things about me…kind of hard to explain that but there it is. Those that have read selected readings from my manuscript know a little bit more about me but have a stronger sense as to who I am. Those that have read my articles, pieces and blog posts might think they have an inside track as to a beginning of a glimpse into the Real Me.

Years ago, an individual that I respected very deeply asked me a question during a time of reckoning in my life. He asked, “What do you tell the demons when they come out at night?” The question floored me because at the time, we were doing the deal for God, Flag and Country. We were marking targets. We were observing enemy movements. We were plotting their very demise. My answer was, “I tell them to kiss my ass”. We laughed and never spoke of it again. Until. There was nothing for us to fear really because after all, we owned the night. Demons? Screw them. Until.

A short time later, we watched a movie entitled “In The Line Of Fire”. It had our hero Clint Eastwood in it so naturally it just had to be a good flick. Yes? Certainly. Until. Until “Frank” asked the “Bad Guy” a question: “What do you see in the dark when the demons come?” The answer? “I see you”. We didn’t remember much of the movie thereafter because we looked at each other in complete amazement and our world crumbled before us. The cat was out of the bag. One can only suppress so many things for a specific period of time until the bottom drops out from under you. No one knows when that will take place but take place it will.

The dialog just before that question and answer period is as follows: “They made you into a real monster didn’t they?” “That’s right. And now they want to destroy me because we can’t have monsters running around the quiet countryside now can we?”

Does that give you chills? Does it? Does it not? I have seen this movie several times since and that particular part of the movie to this day sends chills up and down my spine because that movie started my “associate” and I on our long journey of recovery.

He has since passed on to the Soldier’s Lair having died where he wanted to, on the beaches of Australia almost two years ago. I will miss him but, before he left for Australia, he asked me to promise that I will never give up the fight and I swore an Oath to him, knowing that I would never see him again on this planet, that I would Soldier On. We shook hands, hugged and saluted our last. And, I - Soldier On. Will you Soldier On? Will you Embrace The Suck?

I believe that I have more insight than most into that which we face in this nation at this current time in the cosmos. Barack Hussein Obama or, Czarbama as I have come to call him, is America’s latest Demon. What will we say to our children and our children’s children when they ask us, “Why did we sit idly by and allow this cretin to become president and destroy the last hope of freedom in the world?” As this country spirals down into some allusively morphed form of socio-communist-American liberal tyranny, what will you say to the demons as they come to you at night as you lay in bed kicking yourself in the ass for not standing up and fighting?

The time has come to choose sides. Will you be a part of the AmericanAwakening or will you sit idly by and let others do the dirty work because it is too inconvenient to turn the TV off? In this era of the pollsters knowing absolutely nothing, will you sit idly by and allow the politicians under a Leftinistra veto-proof Congress with a Marxist Thug Demon as in Czarbama at the helm bring about forced servitude of those between the ages of 18 and 42? Is this your Grand Scheme? And, it is a Good Plan? Not hardly. We saw how well that worked in 2006, didn’t we? Why are Conservatives so stupid at times anyway?

We all know why the Unions - read that Teamsters - all favor the Democrats, I mean Leftinistra, don’t we? We do know that union wages are tied to minimum wage, don’t we? We do know that union wages are set to be at times 6 times the minimum wage, don’t we? Is it any wonder why the labor unions suck up to the socialists? Can you spell useful morons? With The American Demon Czarbama at the helm, he wants to get rid of Teamsters oversight. Is that a good thing? Why, no, it isn’t. Perhaps Czarbama wants to create his Civilian National Security Force with the culling from the Teamsters. One never knows.

Rick Moran at Right Wing Nut House a few days ago placed an article up entitled, “TOP TEN THINGS THAT CREEP ME OUT ABOUT OBAMA”. Whereas he has touched Spot On, I would like to add a few things to that list. Behold:

#11) Czarbama has stated publicly that he intends to create a Civilian National Security Force that is just as powerful, just as strong and just as well funded as the United States Armed Forces.

#12) Czarbama has publicly confirmed that he intends to create a Civilian National Security Force that is just as powerful, just as strong and just as well funded as the United States Armed Forces.

#13) Czarbama carries with him at all times his magic wand of indecisiveness, charlatanism and the ability to agree with every point of every issue from every side and has the uncanny ability to have everyone he speaks to think he is the Pied Piper.

#14) Czarbama has stated publicly that he will review and reverse everything that President Bush has done.

#15) Czarbama has publicly presented himself as the New Lenin and all one has to do to confirm that is to gaze upon his posters in Berlin and compare them to the posters from the age of Lenin.

#17) Czarbama associates himself with those that have financed our enemies to fight against us and to kill and wound our Troops in battle.

#18) Czarbama blames the United States for 91101 and he did that eight says after the infamous day when the dust and smoke hadn’t even subsided yet.

#19) Czarbama denies that the Troop Surge was an ingenious plan and that it was successful.

#20) Czarbama wants to increase our taxes by $4,000 per household.

Is that enough yet? Not quite.

#21) Czarbama wants to add an additional $845 BILLION in taxes to finance the American Global War on Poverty. [EDITED…285 changed to 845]

#22) Czarbama wants to ratify L.O.S.T..

That is all for now. So, tell me again how he will be good for the nation in the long run. Czarbama wants to strip this nation of its sovereignty and surrender to our enemies. Some say that he will be a lame duck from his first day. Consider this.

Czarbama gets into the White House and along with him comes a veto-proof conglomerate and there will be nothing to stop him from reversing all of President Bush’s accomplishments, both good and bad. There will be nothing to stop the Fairness Doctrine from becoming a reality. There will be nothing to stop him from raising taxes to the degree of which we have never seen. There will be nothing to stop him from creating his Civilian National Security Forces and there will be nothing to stop the Universal National Service Act. We will no longer have a voice to be heard. Conservative talk shows both professional and BTR will cease to exist. Conservative bloggers and Conservative outlets will vanish.

Czarbama mentioned at one time his presidency would be for 8 to 10 years. So much for the 22nd Amendment and kiss the United States Constitution goodbye because once we are turned over to the One World United Nations Consortium and World Court, the Conservative Voice is history. Remember the List of 45? Have you read it? Have you memorized it? Are you armed? Do you give a damn? If not, why then, did we fight for you? Do you give a damn? If not, why then, should we fight for you again?

Previous posts in regards to the Enemy of The State running for President of the USA

NOTE: Many thanks go out to my friend RG from RADARSITE for this commentary to this post which he posted at his site:

A note from Radarsite: Radarsite is fortunate to have made a lot of good friends in this small part of the blogosphere. Many of these friends and fellow bloggers are veterans. Some from the deadly jungles of Vietnam. And some from unheralded battles and wars that must still remain classified. These people are special. They all seem to share some common fundamental traits: a certain toughness of mind, coupled with a deep hard-won humility. And one common trait which I particularly value — an absolute and uncompromising self-honesty, and a correspondingly low threshold for bulls**t. It’s almost as though they’ve developed a sixth sense that picks it up immediately. This is one of the reasons why it pays to listen to their opinions and to heed their warnings. They are coming to you directly without interference from the ego.

Our good friend Snooper is one of these special people. For those of you who know him you are familiar with the sound of his voice. And it’s an impressive sound, isn’t it? It gets your attention immediately. It reaches right out and grabs you. There’s no equivocation there, no fumbling ambiguities. Just dead on truth. His truth. And if you don’t like it, tough.

Men like this seldom wax nostalgic. They seldom complain, they rarely talk about their feelings or their fears. But on those rare occasions when they do, we listen. And we listen closely.

This is one of those times. This particular posting took me completely off guard. It ‘reached out and grabbed me’. It is something special. Something we don’t see every day. Something we will remember.

I am posting this short essay of Snooper’s today in honor of all of those friends of ours who have learned what truth really means. Those who have served and have sacrificed, and who, in their very private moments in the darkness still serve and still sacrifice. - rg

Thanks RG and IHHR too..

The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.Sic vis pacem para bellumFight Accordingly

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the favorable treatment afforded combat pay under the earned income tax credit, and for other purposes.

To REQUIRE? Forced servitude? To AUTHORIZE THE INDUCTION? Forced servitude? I am detecting a pattern here. And for OTHER PURPOSES? What might those other purposes be..prey tell?

Short Title - This Act may be cited as the 'Universal National Service Act of 2007'

There's that "universal" term again. Reps Charles B Rangel, Yvette D Clark and Jim McDermott are responsible for this crap. Yes, it was introduced months and months ago but it hasn't died yet and is still in committee. The fact remains that it is being brought up again this coming September, on the 7th anniversary of 91101. Coincidence? Not hardly. I don't believe in coincidences at all - never, ever. There is no such thing as a coincidence in my book. At least not when it involves the Marxist Leftinistra in this country.

This bill is in the following committees: Committee of Armed Services, Committee On Ways and Means, House Armed Services and Subcommittee On Military Personnel. Now, why would this bill for "inducing" servitude of "civilians" go to the military? Remember Czarbama's words?

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.

Did Czarbama jump the shark on this one? Was he informed of this September "convention" in which this EXACT issue was scheduled to take place? Is this why the Service Nation web site was scrubbed, just like Czarbama's web site often is? Is this why at this moment there are folks on his web site arguing over who is a better communist? Once again, so many questions and yet, no answers.

This bill is rife with oddities. One of the most notable, at least to myself, is the forced induction to volunteer. In my military service, I was volunteered quite often to perform one duty or another. "You are ordered to volunteer" was a common expression. Here is another gem on this bill...

(3) The term 'national service' means military service or service in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.

There's that reference to the AmeriCorps 250K strong and the doubling the size of the Peace Corps. Here is yet another poser...

(d) Selection for Induction -

(1) RANDOM SELECTION FOR MILITARY SERVICE - When the induction of persons for military service is authorized by subsection (b), the President shall utilize a mechanism for the random selection of persons to be inducted to perform military service.

(2) CIVILIAN SERVICE - Persons described in section 102(a) who do not volunteer to perform military service or are not inducted for military service shall perform their national service obligation in a civilian capacity pursuant to section 102(b)(2).

(e) Voluntary Service - A person subject to induction under this title may--

(1) volunteer to perform national service in lieu of being inducted; or

(2) request permission to be inducted at a time other than the time at which the person is otherwise called for induction.

Someone explain something to me, please. If this is a voluntary thing, why would they be classified as being subject to induction? I smell a Marxist Leftinistra in the midst. Yep. And we cannot leave out the ladies...

SEC. 111. REGISTRATION OF FEMALES UNDER THE MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT.

There ya go! We will now be registering the ladies for the New Amerikan Conscript Army. Nice.

I hardly think that this is all a fabrication. We remember when a draft was voted on several times during the GWOT. They were sore;y defeated and even the ones introducing the bills voted against them. It was all smoke and mirrors for the Fruit Loop Brigades, aka anti-war or peace thug groups, and other insignificant twits such as Code Skank.

Also, with Barack's apparent shark jumping in Colorado and the scrubbing of the Service Nation web site prior to their 91108 "convention" and the deafly silent alleged main stream (ripple) media, my pinger and palsy detectors are in full swing and the danger meter needle is not only pegged, it is wrapped around the spindle a few times.

With his profile set as Lenin, and his campaign staff in tow along with his 300+ advisors all bent on "fact finding", where in the hell were his Senate Staffers? And, who paid the tab on this non-campaign campaign fact-finding tour?

With his bald faced lies as to why he dissed our gravely wounded Troops in Germany, is it any wonder at all why this guy Czarbama creeps so many people out and why even Al Jazeera says he is a twit? Even the Germans that he wasn't able to bribe to attend with free beer, brats and concerts think he is an idiot.

Czarbama: the very definition of Clear and Present Danger if there ever was a definition...

This is getting even more and more curious and outrageous by the nanosecond.

In my previous post here (one of 19 including this one) on this subject of Barack Insane Hussein Nobama's Civilian National Security Forces, as shown here, I explained Obama's intentions utilizing his own verbiage as expressed in the USA Today interview in the Military Times on 08 July 08. His intentions are clear but the Lame Stream Media including Fox News are too busy licking the seats that Barack rises from.

Now, today, just a few moments ago, I noticed a Gateway Pundit post entitled, Obama Caught Stealing Ideas From Cuban Communist Regime. Sounds about right but to my surprise, it was in reference to Barack's Yoots Brigades. As Gateway has done, so will I.

In order to get the full import of the following blog post, one must actually click the link to Babalu Blog and read what someone that used to live under a regime that actually had a Civilian National Security Force. I might add that Gusana is very, very, very angry.

Our You Tube entry on this subject is here, major HT to x_dhimmi (deb). And yes, we are correct in our conclusions. Why else is Barack and his press moppets so silent?

HT goes to the JPA Live BTR Show and Danger Girl for an article in Military Times, which is owned by Gannett which also publishes the USA Today newspaper. I called your attention to the MT's affiliation because the MT in no way and by no means whatsoever is linked to the "official" military news outlets. All "official" news outlets of the military are either .org or .gov. Any alleged military news outlet which has a .com or a .net designator should be taken with a grain of salt - or something of a lesser value. This, however, does not apply to blogs or bloggers for the obvious - even to the oblivious - reasons. To perform a back-check, please visit this site.

Now that the disclaimer has been provided, we will now take a look at this interview by USA Today staffers with Barack Obama, giving the inference that the military is interviewing Barack Insane Hussein Obama. Scurrilous does not even come close to the implications here, does it?

In this interview the following question was asked:

Q: You said you don't want to rob Peter to pay Paul, so how are you going to pay Paul? Troop increases are an enormous expense.

To arrive at the full intent and the presented answer - if you can call it that - one will have to read the entire interview. This interview is a near prefect case study for a pretty verbiage explanation as to how the would-be First Czar of the newly formed USSA (with a "k") will decimate the now United States Armed Forces. He claims that he wants to expand the military but what he doesn't say is that he intends on taking the punch our military has away from them. We will have a bigger military with a lesser punch. This sounds counter productive to me.

In conjunction with this and before we continue with this interview by USA Today staffers, please recall thisstatement: (where he mentions AmeriCorps and Peace Corps as the "civilians")

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

That statement alone is scary but having it placed in context is frightening. Barack, in this interview, has placed it in context. One of the partners here at A Newt One, Loki, has stated that if Barack intends to utilize AmeriCorps and Peace Corps personnel to fill vacancies in embassies and missions "that have been boarded up", he certainly doesn't understand the United States Constitution that her has purported to have once been an instructor thereof. However, it gets worse than that. This has grown beyond the pale of frightening. Behold:

[...] I should add, by the way, that part of the change that I want when it comes to Army and Marine structures is the mix of training that we're providing and mix of personnel that are in these forces. One of the things I have been so impressed with is the heroic job that our men and women in uniform have done basically on the fly having to train themselves on the spot to function as engineers or function as social workers or function as translators or political consultants. There's just been a whole bunch of work that has been done that we haven't prepared people for. They learn on the job, but if anything Iraq should have given us a template for the kinds of skill sets that we're going to have to provide to our military. And that's true in Iraq. That's true in Afghanistan. That also means, by the way, that we're going to have to, I believe, reconfigure our civilian national security force. In a way that just hasn't been done.

I mean, we still have a national security apparatus on the civilian side in the way the State Department is structured and [Agency for International Development] and all these various agencies. That hearkens back to the Cold War. And we need that wing of our national security apparatus to carry its weight. When we talk about reinventing our military, we should reinvent that apparatus as well. We need to be able to deploy teams that combine agricultural specialists and engineers and linguists and cultural specialists who are prepared to go into some of the most dangerous areas alongside our military. [...]

Parse that.

This interview was published on 08 JUL 08, 6 days after his speech in Colorado Springs. However, he makes no mention of AmeriCorps or Peace Corps personnel but he does say this:

[...] Absolutely, but the only problem with soft power is the term itself makes people think it's not as strong as hard power. And my point is that if we've got a State Department or personnel that have been trained just to be behind walls, and they have not been equipped to get out there alongside our military and engage, then we don't have the kind of national security apparatus that is needed. That has to be planned for; it has to be paid for. Those personnel have to be trained. And they all have to be integrated and that is something that we have not accomplished yet, but that's going to be what's increasingly important in our future to make sure that our military has the support that it needs to do what it does the best, which is fight wars. [...]

And there you have it. He is going to arm State Department Personnel so they can fight along side the United States Military. He is going to utilize AmeriCorps and Peace Corps Personnel to go into areas the US Military does to be the Agents of Change. Case closed and checkmate.

Excuse me Barack but the US Military Special Forces already handle such activities. Does the Anbar Awakening ring a bell? Our military, in special detail, has the training you are babbling about and making it sound like this is a new concept and making it sound like a good idea because you thought of it. Sorry. The US Military has already been doing this for years and decades.

Thank you ever so kindly x_dhimmi (deb) for another fine video. The below video is a work still in progress but I thought to get this version up and running. For email subscribers, go here to view and vote.

I haven't heard any politician in my years on this planet espouse the things that Barack Insane Obama has said in his trek to be First Czar. I once thought that Hillary was trying to be the first Czarina but, with all of Hillary's leftist sillygisms, she is as level-headed as a leftist can get.

I have an audio file that everyone needs to hear, heed and fight for answers. The audio clip is from a speech delivered on 02 JUL 08 by Insane Boy. The You Tube is here and this clip has been culled from 16:35 to 17:02. The clip is sandwiched between what I thought to be a very appropriate song snippet.

The offending verbiage is not in the text of the speech...I wonder why that is?

World Net Daily now notices it as well that the "offending verbiage" is AWOL from the prepared speech text. Such a sly one this would-be Czar.

[...] The stunning comments from Democrat Sen. Barack Obama that the United States needs a "civilian national security force" that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar United States Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force have mysteriously disappeared from published transcripts of the speech. [...]

Very interesting...wish I had a screen shot. The speech verbiage can also be found here.

Another update: CJ at Soldier's Perspective has identified the fellows on the stage with The Big Dummy are Colorado Vets Against The War - associates with the Winter Soldier frauds IVAW. Go figure. No wonder they have the Bobble Head Syndrome.

Way back on 09 JUL 08, I penned a piece entitled, We Live In Upside Down Land, where we discussed the initial findings of the Obama Civilian Army. Since then, it has become even more clear the true intent. In the process of looking for this in the Lame Stream Media, I ran across these two pieces by observing links placed in several BTR chat rooms. One link is at Exurban League, Arizona's leading political blog and the other is The American Pundit. I originally read the initial data at the AARP site here.

[...] LOL WUT? Obama's going to create a civilian national security force as strong as the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines - combined? With the same budget? And hardware, apparently? Holy %^&*! [...]

I am curious as to what the hieroglyphics mean? ROFLMAO!

WE cannot afford to NOT demand an explanation to this. Some seem to think that the Obama premise would be a good idea to free up our military from duties that the Obama Civilian Army could do. I would sort of kind of maybe or maybe not could be might sort of go along with that IF it wasn't so painfully obvious that the Leftinistra are currently whining that our CURRENT military is being used as the world's police force. If Obama gets this "program" active, wouldn't they be doing the same thing that our military does? If so, then what is the difference? If not, what is the purpose of the Obama Civilian Army?

NY Daily News today and although short and sweet, it is exactly to the point. We can label the threats from the Jihadim as "politics of fear" as some of the Leftinistra and those suffering from the Ostrich Syndrome all we want to. The fact remains:

[...] But fear is what's called for in the face of an epic uprising of murderous fanatics who want all the planet as their gleaming caliphate. Standing in their way, fortunately, are people sensible enough to be alarmed. Like Evans. And Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. And, for that matter, rock star Bono, who recently startled a Rolling Stone interviewer with his unexpectedly illiberal opinion that jihadists are a real problem. [...]

Ask anyone that has ever been in a combat situation...fear can keep you alive or, fear can kill you. It all depends on what one does with or responds with or reacts to that fear.

I find it interesting that the Leftinistra will proclaim that the True Patriots of the United States are practicing "politics of fear" when driving home the point of the rise of The Caliphate yet, the myth of Global Warming is not "politics of fear". One threat is real...Islamofascism...it is a matter of historical record. The Jihadists sided with the Nazis in WWII. Global Warming, a non-threat, is a theory which hasn't been proven. As a young lad, I was told that by 1979/1980, Manhattan Island was going to be under water. I was also told that by 1973 > 1975, New England was going to experiencing a modern day Ice Age. Neither Global Weather Myth ever came true and the current Myth of Goracalism is certainly the biggest farce there ever has been in modern times.

The AIJAC has the perfect explanation that most will ignore because it is considered to be that dreaded fear mongering diatribe. Let me tell you. Fear can kill and fear can save. I know. And those close to me know what I mean. Fear kept me alive on many "activities".

Osama bin Laden's "Declaration of War Against the Americans," August 1996.

"The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies - civilians and military - is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it..."

Osama bin Laden in a fatwah issued February 23, 1998.

The article above was published 10/01.

Way back in August, I wrote a piece onMoral Paralysisand excerpts of that piece follow:

DECLARATION OF WARAGAINST THE AMERICANS OCCUPYING THE LAND OF THE TWO HOLY PLACES. A Message from Usama bin Muhammad bin Laden unto his Muslim Brethren all over the world generally, and in the Arab Peninsula specifically Praise be to Allah, we seek His help and ask for his pardon. We take refuge in Allah from our wrongs and bad deeds. Who ever been guided by Allah will not be misled, and who ever has been misled, he will never be guided. I bear witness that there is no God except Allah no associates with Him and I bear witness that Muhammad is His slave and messenger.

The above was a spattering of a 17-page document. In fact, the above is the preamble. Some would have us believe that this is a war of ideologies. This is an incorrect analogy and conclusion. Just reading the preamble should, to a rational being, reveal that this war declared upon the United States of America is a religious war. We, as a Nation, do not believe as they do. So, we must be either converted or put to the sword, as it were. Read the fatwa and prove me wrong.

Please note that the Fatwa was declared in 1998. Three years before the infamous Day of Infamy of 91101. Thank you for nothing President William Jefferson Clinton.

The Caliphate is a ruling body of "holy" Islamofascists "preachers" that want strict adherence to Islamic law from the Plains of Iberia to Indo-China, where it once ruled and existed. The Caliphate was dismantled before 1930. 77 years have gone by, approximately, and the Caliphate has started to roll right along and slowly begin to rise and assert itself.

Thomas Sowell has a piece up over atTownhall. It is entitled, "Morally Paralyzed". In the article, Mr Sowell draws some astounding conclusions which I have espoused through the years and his words ring true and every American needs to listen up.

"Moral paralysis" is a term that has been used to describe the inaction of France, England and other European democracies in the 1930s, as they watched Hitler build up the military forces that he later used to attack them.

It is a term that may be painfully relevant to our own times.

Back in the 1930s, the governments of the democratic countries knew what Hitler was doing -- and they knew that they had enough military superiority at that point to stop his military buildup in its tracks. But they did nothing to stop him.

Instead, they turned to what is still the magic mantra today -- "negotiations."

No leader of a democratic nation was ever more popular than British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain -- wildly cheered in the House of Commons by opposition parties as well as his own -- when he returned from negotiations in Munich in 1938, waving an agreement and declaring that it meant "peace in our time."

We know now how short that time was. Less than a year later, World War II began in Europe and spread across the planet, killing tens of millions of people and reducing many cities to rubble in Europe and Asia.

Looking back after that war, Winston Churchill said, "There was never a war in all history easier to prevent by timely action." The earlier it was done, the less it would have cost.

At one point, Hitler could have been stopped in his tracks "without the firing of a single shot," Churchill said.

Click the link to read the rest, please.

A brief synopsis from the CIC at McDill AFB follows. GWB is wrong in quite a few items of interest but, one thing is for sure, he is mostly correct in his assessment of the threat of The Caliphate. Just a few steps closer and he will be right on target.

MacDill AFB, Tampa, FL - President George W. Bush vowed to keep talking and educating Americans about the "consequences of failure" and praised Coalition members for their support during an address Tuesday afternoon at the U.S. Central Command Coalition Conference at MacDill Air Force Base.

Bush said he came to Tampa to thank America's partners who continue to stand with the United States on the Global War on Terror. His visit was significant in that it's the first time he has been to the command since Adm. William J. Fallon became commander in March.

Bush admitted the past four years haven't been easy, especially in Iraq, but that they were necessary if that nation and Afghanistan are to emerge as free societies.

"Once again, history has called on great nations to assume great responsibilities," Bush said. "The broad coalition has protected millions of people."

Bush reminded everyone that on Sept. 11, 2001, 19 terrorists went on a rampage that killed more than 3,000 people from 80 countries. Since that time, some 90 nations have worked in some capacity to stop Al Qaida and the Taliban.

The president likened the radical Islamic push for a caliphate to that of Nazi Germany.

"They are determined to bring days of greater destruction" Bush said. "We must go on the offense, stay on the offense, and take the fight to "them."

Since 9/11, America and her allies have shared intelligence that has essentially stopped numerous attacks, terror cells have been broken up and local law enforcement and armies have been trained around the globe.

"We're active," Bush told the Coalition members. "We're working together to make this world a safer place."

According to the president who has been at odds with Congress over the fighting in Iraq, said failure in Iraq should be unacceptable to the civilized world. He said point blank that he fully expected to veto Congress' bill, that calls for pulling troops out of the beleaguered Middle East nation, by the end of the day.

"Our enemies, the enemies of freedom, love chaos and out of that chaos, they can find safe havens," he said. "The Iraqis are suffering a lot, but they're still in this fight and I'm impressed by their courage.

Unfortunately, sectarian violence has increased since democratic elections were held in Iraq in 2005," he added. "A new strategy has emerged to curb the unrest. It's still in its early stages and it could take months to determine the success of it, however, some early successes have already been noted, mainly a decline in sectarian violence."

Once again, Bush thanked the Coalition for their efforts in making that happen. "I want your countries to know that the sacrifices made by your Soldiers are for a noble cause," Bush said. "Our nations are standing together in this fight and I want your citizens to know this nation is grateful."

Bush talked about a number of other items that included education of the American people regarding the war on terror. He called himself the educator in chief, as well as the commander in chief.

"We have got to keep talking about the consequence of failure," Bush said. "Failure will make this world a really dangerous place."

He also talked about opinion polls and that decisions that are in the best interest of the United States can't be based upon opinion polls.

He mentioned Abraham Lincoln, who wasn't popular when he decided to abolish slavery and Franklin D. Roosevelt who shrugged off isolationist opinion polls leading up to U.S. involvement in World War II.

"We can learn a lot from the past and we shouldn't fear the future," Bush said. "I will do my best to convince the American people it's worth it."

Denying the threat of The Caliphate to the Free World is akin to believing that Hillary Clinton would be a good President.

Not many people are familiar with the House Rules Committee, or why it has so much power to determine what legislation passes the House. Simply put, the Committee sets the terms for debate of all significant legislation--how long a bill is debated, who may offer amendments, what amendments may be offered, etc. Before a bill goes to the House floor, the Committee meets to review amendments, hear testimony from interested parties, and discuss how to structure the floor debate.

Rules Committee Chair Louise Slaughter did something unusual however, in the hearing on legislation to extend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act--she announced at the start of the hearing that no amendments of any type would be allowed for debate. Committee Democrats followed Slaughter's lead and voted against amendments to: authorize surveillance of those engaged in the creation of Weapons of Mass Destruction; authorize surveillance of foreign terrorists outside the United States; extend liability protection to telecommunications companies that relied on government directives and shared information deemed necessary for protection from terrorist attack; and, allow a debate on the Bush administration's alternative.

Nothing in this Act [H.R. 3773] or the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to prohibit the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))) from conducting surveillance needed to prevent Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, or any other foreign terrorist organization designated under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) from attacking the United States or any United States person.

[UPDATE by Jeff:] House Democrats were unable to whip enough votes to get their way. Today, they were against a simple vote on a Republican proposal to protect America's intelligence agencies ability to fight Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. That's it - they were against that and fought desperately today to kill it.

When they failed, they pulled the entire FISA bill.

-----------------[UPDATE by Erick:] House Democrats have fallen into disarray. They are currently holding the FISA legislation from the floor until later in the day, so they can have more time to work their voting numbers. If the vote were held right now, the Republican motion would pass. Dems are working their moderates furiously right now. Just a reminder, the proposal Democrats are working against simply protects the ability of our intelligence agencies to protect America from Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda.

“Our proposal gives Democrats a very simple choice: They can allow our intelligence officials to conduct surveillance on likes of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda or prohibit them from doing so and jeopardize our national security. Every member of the Majority will now have the opportunity to go on record and take a firm position for or against giving our intelligence community all the tools they need to keep America safe.”

Eric Cantor calls it drawing a line in the sand and putting everyone on public record:

The House is voting today on FISA legislation, the Democrats have played petty politics with this bill. As currently written, many of America’s national security experts are concerned that it will limit their ability to protect this country. Let’s be clear, the intelligence agencies only wish to use the same investigative tools that have been used against organized crime for decades.

Today, we will be offering an amendment to the legislation to clarify that nothing in the bill “shall be construed to prohibit the intelligence community from conducting surveillance needed to prevent Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, or any other foreign terrorist organization…from attacking the United States or any United States person.”

Later today, on the House floor, let’s put all Members of Congress on the record - which do they care more about, pleasing their MoveOn.org liberal base or making sure America is safe and secure? Stay tuned for updates.

UPDATE:House Democrats are holding the FISA bill off the floor, scrambling to figure out how to respond. Why would they possibly want to avoid a vote that merely says we need to allow our intelligence agencies to keep America safe from terrorism?

UPDATE:House Democrats have pulled the FISA bill. They are so desperately against allowing our intelligence agencies to fight OBL and AQ, that they pulled the entire bill to prevent a vote.

These games the Democrats keep playing (closing off debate and not allowing amendments to come to a vote) are the reason they have been and will continue to be known as weak on National Security.

When the Republicans in the house have to fight the hardest battle against Democrats to keep America safe, that is a pretty sad day in history and yet that is where we are right now.

Once again the Democrats would rather please their far left, liberal, unhinged portion of their base than to protect our country.

The above belongs to Wake Up America.

My comments/addendum is(are) below.

I have filed this post in the category of "Enemies of The State" and "Clear and Present Danger". Why, you ask? I am glad you asked. Do, please, try to follow along. It does relate to the conclusions drawn in the above post.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor – he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation , he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”Marcus Tullius Cicero 42 B.C.

Quite a statesman placed the above together. What does it mean? And, more importantly, how does the statement apply to today's political climate in America today?

On 91101, the entire country rallied together because another Day Of Infamy was upon us all. Our Nation was attacked on American Soil Proper. Our Nation has been under attack since the early 1970s but the politicos did nothing because the "enemy" was but a mere pimple on the buttocks of the world's society. Through the years of the Do Nothing Policy or Policies, the pimples have grown to be infected, bleeding and ulcerous boils with no cure but to exterminate the virus. This is too much for the Bleeding Hearts to accept. This is why they cannot be trusted with National Security issues. They haven't the Warrior's Stomach for it.

The stunt they pulled today is reminiscent of the Reidco ploy after his AllNightSlumberParty failed and was quite the International embarrassment.

On every turn, at every opportunity, the Leftinistra, the armies of the socialist liberal, scream and holler and call foul at every attempt to fulfill the guideline of our Constitution and that is to protect the PEOPLE of this country. They claim to represent the majority of Americans but I have yet to ascertain which Americans they represent the majority of. If they claim that the far-left Anti-Americanists are the majority of Americans, what are the rest of us? The far-leftists are NOT a majority in numbers, not by any stretch of the imagination. They are, however, financed and encouraged by George Soros. And, George Soros has said that he owns the Democratic Party. He holds the purse strings and he calls the shots as to what they say, do and vote on and how.

The liberals are our destruction. They want to destroy the United States and our people. This plan must be blocked.

There are no distinctions between liberals. Each liberal is a sworn enemy of the American people. If he does not make his hostility plain, it is only from cowardice and slyness, not because he loves us.

The liberals are to blame for each American soldier who falls in this war. They have him on their conscience, and must also pay for it.

If someone pulled the lever for Kerry, Pelosi, et al., he is an enemy of the people. He earns the contempt of the entire people, for he is a craven coward who leaves them in the lurch to stand by the enemy.

The liberals enjoy the approval of our enemies. That is all the proof we need to show how harmful they are for our people.

The liberals are the enemy’s agents among us. He who stands by them aids the enemy.

The liberals have no right to claim that their arguments and opinions equal ours. They should be ignored, not only because they are simply wrong, but because they are liberals who have no right to a voice in the community.

If the liberals appeal to your sentimentality, realize that they are hoping for your forgetfulness, and let them know that you see through them and hold them in contempt.

A decent enemy will deserve our generosity after we have won. The liberal however is not a decent enemy, though he tries to seem so.

The treatment liberals receive from us is hardly unjust. They have deserved it all. It is the job of the government to deal with them. No one has the right to act on his own, but each has the duty to support the state’s measures against the liberals, to defend them with others, and to avoid being misled by any liberal tricks.

Washington, DC – Richard Collins, founder of StopHerNow.com, today called on Sen. Hillary Clinton to release nearly two million pages of documents located at the William J. Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, AR. The documents detail her tenure as first lady and are said to contain memos, diaries, telephone logs, appointment logs, calendars, daily planners, and schedules. The library’s chief archivist does not expect the documents to be released until after the ‘08 Presidential Election.

“If Hillary Clinton is going to run on her experience as first lady, she cannot keep related documents under lock and key at the Clinton Library. What is she hiding and why? America needs to know now,” said Richard Collins.

Collins continued, asking how Sen. Clinton expects the voters to make an educated decision in the ‘08 election when she is hiding this information from the public.

“Sen. Clinton has continuously chastised the Bush administration for not releasing documents and called for a more transparent government. If this is her idea of transparency, one can only guess the level of hypocrisy she will achieve if she is elected President,” said Richard Collins.

In addition to the two million documents, there are also said to be more than 1,000 relating to Sen. Clinton’s efforts to enact Hillary-Care.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Rosalynn Carter, Nancy Reagan and Barbara Bush all have their records open to the public at their husband’s presidential libraries.

StopHerNow.com is an organization of concerned citizens that is dedicated to spreading the truth about Hillary Clinton and her dangerous ideas and plans for the country. www.StopHerNow.com.

To schedule an interview with Richard Collins, please contact Joe Turman with

And why? If Hillary aspires to be First Czarina of the United States, and she self-applauds her self-vaunted Good Deeds accomplished as First Lady, why, then, has she had her "records of achievements" locked up until AFTER the 2008 Presidential Elections?

I will tell you why. She is a closet communist. Her aspirations are to have a "Communal Society". Her goal is to have a federally sanctioned Robin Hood dictatorship dressed in Touchy-Feely Rhetoric. Ever hear of Karl Marx?

In a previous post on this blog yesterday, I outlined The List of 45 as presented to the CONgress in 1963 as one can so read in the book, The Naked Communist. There are other posts on this which can be found in the Tags section of the blog. Just look for "List of 45". Therein, one will find links galore to read and study.

Apparently, seeing that her thesis on her hero Alinsky has recently been made available for all to see, she is worried that her now "secret" documents will shed further light on the extension of her and Bill's 20-Year Plan. If the links in the post in regards to the Alinsky Thesis "no longer work", fear not and let not your heart be troubled...I have the pdf file.

More on Hillary's socialistic and communistic tendencies can be located all over the internet but there is no need to search. I, and others, have already accomplished the research. Naturally, you will want to substantiate these facts on your own which, by the way, is indeed commendable. For in-depth coverage and the exposure of the would-be Czarina, check out the Hot Rodham Blog which, is associated with the web site, Stop Her Now.

The above are merely a scratch in the surface at the Hot Rodham Blog. There are links therein. Prove me wrong. The gauntlet has been tossed.

Also, in the VODPOD at the Hot Rodham Blog, there are videos galore where Hillary herself as subliminally exposed her true calling to be Czarina. The problem "IS", she doesn't know it. To the keen eye and the sharp mind, it "IS" all too clear.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton cites her experience as a compelling reason voters should make her president, but nearly 2 million pages of documents covering her White House years are locked up in a building here, obscuring a large swath of her record as first lady.

Two million? She isn't all that Green Friendly to trees, "IS" she?

"IS" anyone buying into this garbage?

Before documents are released, archives staff must read them and, by law, must redact material that they determine contains classified information, invades a person's privacy, reveals trade secrets, reveals confidential advice from presidential advisors or raises other concerns specified in the records law.

Asked how long it might be before Hillary Clinton's records are released, the library's chief archivist said it could take years.

Yeah. Sure. Like they haven't ALREADY been read, cataloged and sorted. If you believe that lie, I'll introduce to you an intelligent Cindy Sheehan.

For an additional "ha-has" and another "OH MY GOD!", please check this out.

Clinton's first lady records locked up — Archivists say the former first lady's documents at her husband's presidential library won't be released until after the '08 vote. — LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton cites her experience as a compelling reason voters should make her president …

Presidential hopeful New York Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is hopping mad at Vice President Dick Cheney for charging her with “reinforcing enemy propaganda.”

In a letter to supporters, Clinton recalls that after she wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking him to “provide Congress with briefings of contingency plans for withdrawal — or an explanation of why no such plans exist,” she got a response from Under Secretary of Defense Eric Edelman who told her that discussing plans for withdrawal of our troops from Iraq “reinforces enemy propaganda.”

That, fumed Clinton, “was an outrageous response — and a dangerous one. Planning for withdrawal isn’t just common sense. It is vital to ensuring our troops return home safe.”

As long as this idiot Hillary rambles on about troops withdrawal, she and her kind put our troops further into harms way by enabling the enemy, plain and simple.

And her “candid concern” about the troops is laughably a criminal act in this DAV’s opinion.

John Perazzo knows his stuff and is quite the investigative dispatcher of truth. He is another one that knows full well the consequences to the American Way of Life should Czarina get elected to the presidency of the United States. Life as we know it now would turn to a socialist state where the only freedom we would enjoy is tyhe freedom to submit or die. Sound familiar? Islam. Convert or die.

There isn’t much difference between Hillary, Bill or “radical” Islam.

Hillary is the author of several books;

Living History (2003); An Invitation to the White House: At Home with History (2000); and It Takes a Village: and Other Lessons Children Teach Us (1996).In these books, she disguises her political aspirations and her communist rants in the form of touchy-feely sound-goods. The over-emotional and the week-kneed and those with no leadership capabilities will follow such drivel as blind mice would follow the Pied Piper.

She was originally a Republican but she was overcome by the Maoist writer Carl Oglesby. John Perazzo goes into much detail in this regard.

She became fully entrenched in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam Police Action and we all know how that ended up…they lied and millions died. Naturally, her friend Jihad Jane and Kerry the Worm will deny that.

Hillary worked hard at being a good little Marxist recruit and was lead by the short-hairs by those advocating the overthrow of the United States government. However, all in the name of free speech, she and her cohorts were allowed to prattle and entrench their hatred for everything Americana and set out to slowly rewrite our history and to so distort the United States Constitution that that document would eventually become meaningless. As a “yoot” during those times, I remember the rioting of the peaceniks and the destruction of private and government property and I never understood and I still don’t understand how peaceniks think it OK for THEIR strain of violent behavior to further their cause.

Hillary was mentored by such prominent communists as Tommy the Commie (Thomas Emerson), Charles Garry and

Robert Treuhaft, who According tohistorian Stephen Schwartz, “Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB.” Nice bedfellows Hillary kept company with, no?

There are many more socialist/communist groups and people that Hillary was mentored by and associated herself with which disqualifies her to become the CIC and the guarantor of American Freedom as proclaimed in our Constitution.

As I read this article by John Perazzo, this particular item leaped from the screen and slapped me across the face. It is so damaging and revealing that, for some reason, the Hot Rodham Blog won’t allow it to be published. Here it is:

A few days after rumors of Bill Clinton’s extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky first made headlines in January 1998, Hillary made a January 27 appearance on NBC’s Today Show, where she told interviewer Matt Lauer that the charges had been fabricated by “this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced [that he would run] for President.” Hillary would echo this theme numerous times thereafter. In a June 8, 2003 interview with Barbara Walters, for instance, she characterized the Republicans who had led the 1998 impeachment of her husband as “a right-wing network” that “was after his presidency” and had resorted to “perverting the Constitution.”

Pervert the Constitution? Is she kidding? What Hillary has set out to accomplish is give the front that she and she alone can be trusted to “protect and defend” the Constitution and by so doing, she is to be the next President of The United States. Clearly, this woman is a Clear and Present Danger to the very conyinuance of The United States as a free nation.

One other item slammed me fairly hard as well;

Striving to neutralize what she considered the pervasive racism of the American legal system, “Hillary was,” as Barbara Olson observed in Hell to Pay, “a budding Leninist.”Ibid., pp. 56, 62.

Read this piece and the article of Front Page Mag. Then, take a gander of the previously published posts here: List of 45, Hillary, Clintons, Double Standards, and Leftinistra, to name just a few. Especially in The List of 45,read through the list and see how many of them The Rodham espouses. If you agree with them, that would make you a Marxist and an Enemy of The State as well.

Well, sadly, I watched the entire Democratic Party Contenders For President Debate, hosted by CNN and they had a froggy YouTube thing. I wonder if Cal Worthington had anything to do with this. Debate. “IS” that what it was?

I can sum up the entire “debate” (for lack of a better word) in five (5 for those of you in CONgress) words. Bash Bush and Praise Reagan. We all know they HATED Reagan so the insidious referrals to one of America’s Heroes was disingenuous at best.

The MOST dishonest would-be Presidential Aspirant this evening was Hillary. Go to CNN, as I will be in the morning, and download the transcript for tonight. Zero in on Hillary’s answers and compare them to the videos in our VODPOD in the sidebar on the main page on this blog. Find the video in regards to “we are in this together”, “I am going to take from those that have and give it to those that don’t”, find out just what in the hell a “modern progressive ‘IS’” and compare it to her rhetoric of this evening and on the videos. Like Club For Growth was saying;

“Pigs were flying in South Carolina tonight during the Democratic presidential debate as Hillary Clinton announced that she is not a big-government liberal but a “modern progressive” that “believes strongly in individual rights and freedoms.”

If she isn’t for Big Brother Rule, she sure has quite a few people hood-winked. She really should pay more attention to her press releases and “remember” that WE ARE WATCHING and we have neat toys like camcorders and video cameras and B-L-O-G-S.

Modern Progressive? Is that like an old time communist? Click the link and check out the VERIFIABLE data therein. I thought I had a post on this blog the other day with this data. It vanished. Perhaps it went a little too far. Ho hum. I will place the post on my blog Take Our Country Back. If this link takes you to the main page, scroll around. If not, I have returned to place the exact link here.

Hillary is the epitome of communism with a little flare and condescension. Her detractors will deny this and so will she. Everything this Clear and Present Danger does is dishonest and entirely contrary to the United States. She wants to remake America in the vision of her mentors, Carl Oglesby, Saul Alinsky, Duncan Kennedy, Mickey Kantor, Thomas Emerson to name a few.

I take from conducting extensive research on The Rodham that a Modern Progressive “IS” an Old Time Leninist.

Do we want this in America?

Think about it.

“I am hard-pressed to imagine something more absurd than Hillary Clinton defending individual rights and eschewing the big-government label on national television,” said Club for Growth President Pat Toomey. “Kudos to CNN host Anderson Cooper for keeping a straight face.”

You are free to share, to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix, to adapt the work under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.
''