Is a Reverse Stock Split Good or Bad?

More Articles

Reverse stock splits boost a company's share price. A higher share price is usually good, but the increase that comes from a reverse split is mostly an accounting trick. The company isn't any more valuable than it was before the reverse split. Whatever value it has is just distributed over fewer shares of stock, thus increasing the price. A reverse split can sometimes save a stock sinking in value from a delisting.

Tip

Although a reverse stock split can improve share price over the short term, it is important to remember that the market capitalization of the company has not changed. With that in mind, some experts consider a reverse stock split nothing more than a distraction to assuage investors during times of corporate uncertainty.

The Mechanics of a Reverse Split

In a reverse split, a company cancels all of its outstanding stock and distributes new shares to its stockholders. The number of new shares you get is in direct proportion to how many you owned before, but the number itself will be smaller. In a 1-for-2 reverse split, for example, you would come out of the split owning one share for every two you owned previously.

If you owned 1,200 shares, for example, then you would wind up with 600 shares. In a 1-for-3 split, you end up with one share for every three you owned, so you would emerge from the reverse split with 400 shares.

Exploring An Example

One of the many reasons a reverse stock split might occur is to boost the attractiveness of a company's stock prior to significant changes, such as the splitting of a company into smaller organizations. This strategy has been used before by large international companies such as Tyco International, and Motorola Solutions. Even though the overall market cap remains unchanged, the split allows for a compelling boost in general share price.

Evaluating Share Prices

The company's market capitalization – the total value of all its shares – stays the same before and after the reverse split. Say a company has 10 million outstanding shares and a stock price of 50 cents a share, for a market cap of $5 million. It then executes a 1-for-4 reverse split, reducing the number of shares to 2.5 million.

The company's value remains the same, at $5 million, so now each share is worth $2. If you owned 100 shares at 50 cents apiece before, now you own 25 shares worth $2 apiece. The total value of your investment remains the same: $50. Nothing about the company has changed except the number of shares available.

Understanding Corporate Rationale

Companies pull off reverse splits to keep their stock prices out of the cellar. In part, it's aesthetics and public relations: A stock price in the pennies-to-a-few-dollars range just looks bad. But there are also practical reasons: To remain listed on a major stock exchange, a company usually has to maintain a stock price above a certain level, often $1.

In 2009, for example, financial giant American International Group was in danger of being pulled off the New York Stock Exchange when its stock fell below $2. The solution: a 1-for-20 reverse split that boosted the price above $20. In 2011, Citigroup executed a 1-for-10 split that took its stock from around $4.50 a share to about $45 literally overnight.

Expert Reactions to Reverse Splits

Charles Kaplan, president of the investment consulting firm Equity Analytics, told Bankrate.com, "It is usually a very negative sign when a company reverse splits their stocks." But how the market reacts often depends on what else the company is doing to reverse its fortunes.

If it simply declares the reverse split and goes on with business as usual, investors may see the split as nothing more than a smoke screen, and the price may go right back to falling as they sell their shares. But if the split is accompanied by serious changes in management, structure or strategy, investors may give the company more time to right the ship.

Video of the Day

About the Author

Cam Merritt is a writer and editor specializing in business, personal finance and home design. He has contributed to USA Today, The Des Moines Register and Better Homes and Gardens"publications. Merritt has a journalism degree from Drake University and is pursuing an MBA from the University of Iowa.

At the center of everything we do is a strong commitment to independent research and sharing its profitable discoveries with investors. This dedication to giving investors a trading advantage led to the creation of our proven Zacks Rank stock-rating system. Since 1986 it has nearly tripled the S&P 500 with an average gain of +26% per year. These returns cover a period from 1986-2011 and were examined and attested by Baker Tilly, an independent accounting firm.

Visit performance for information about the performance numbers displayed above.