The spring storm

There must be something in the Vastu of Singha Darbar that makes its principal occupants think and behave like little emperors. Like Louis XV, Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal announced last month that any effort to dislodge his government would trigger another revolution and Maoists would eventually ‘capture’ power.

His Indian mentors who persuaded him in 2005 to join mainstream politics probably forgot to tell the guerrilla chief that a revolving-door government is an essential feature of the parliamentary system. The day Balkhu Darbar decides that it has no further use for Premier Dahal, he will have to make way for Madhab Nepal. The mood in the legislature is turning distinctly anti-Maoist. Almost all the parties, including the kangresis, would be only too happy to join a UML-led coalition, whatever the unpredictable consequences of such an unlikely formation.

Dahal needs to realise that like everybody else in any democratic set-up, he is neither irreplaceable in his own party nor indispensable to the country. History has an uncanny habit of getting rid of powerful men when they least expect it. In any case, no prime minister since Chandra Shamsher, incidentally the prime minister who built Singha Darbar, has served what could be called a normal term of office in that jinxed palace.

Since the British days and the rise of the Ranas, Lainchaur has always been a factor in influencing the outcome of court intrigues in Kathmandu. The other influential player was always the army. Popular support, when it mattered at all, came last. The first elected prime minister of the country BP Koirala realised this reality when he found himself behind bars despite two-thirds majority of his party in the parliament. Dahal’s party commands the loyalty of only about one-third of members of the legislative assembly.

The Tarai is another factor that can upset the best calculations of power brokers. Despite boasts of some Hindi-speaking Madhesi leaders and allegations of extremists of the left and right alike, the Indians have very few levers of manipulation in the plains of Nepal. Madhesis blame the Americans for funding and abetting King Mahendra’s planned transmigration of Pahadis in the Tarai as a part of a Cold War strategy. US-friendly non-governmentals have recently made inroads into the central Tarai, but their impact is still largely peripheral. It’s not for nothing that Matrika Yadav decided to explore China before designing a political outfit to face the challenges of the future?the northern neighbour has no baggage in the southern plains.

The Maoists realised the importance of the Tarai during elections last year, but they appear to still be confused about the strategy that would help expand their base into the restive region. They have been unwittingly falling for Panchayat-era practice of stoking the fire of fear among Pahadis that Madhesi’s aspirations for equal rights somehow constitute a threat to national integrity.

From Mohan Baidya to Krishna Bahadur Mahara, every Maoist leader considers it a part of his ‘nationalist’ duty to denigrate Madhes-based parties. This strategy may help them consolidate their base among former royalists but is unlikely to win friends and gain supporters in the Tarai. Perhaps a more sensitive approach is necessary to assuage the fears of Madhesis that they would not be short-changed once again by the new ruling class.

After their much-publicised pow-wow over the Madhes, the Maoists are planning to raise a storm in the spring to gain a foothold in the region. The UML is already there: it has pitted its Tharu front against Madhes-based parties. TMDP is out in the streets agitating for immediate implementation of peace accord signed with the previous government. If push comes to shove, the MJF and the pro-establishment Sadbhabana will have little hesitation in leaving the government.

A year after the Tarai acquiesced to constituent assembly elections on the promise of change, the plains are once again rife with apprehension that the coalition government isn’t serious about their concerns. There is a clear trust deficit between the rulers and the ruled and government hasn’t helped its case by floating the idea of Integrated Services Centres (ISCs) to be located along the east-west highway.

Before they raise a storm in the Tarai-Madhes, the Maoists would do well to earn the trust of Madhesis. The issue is too important to be left to slogan-mongers unthinkingly raising the bogey of separatism or chauvinism.

Share this:

Like this:

Related

You are right.
Madhesis have been repressed and now that they have realized and want equal rights, Pahadi leaders, not Pahadis though, think this is unjust and rather dismiss as some sort of revolution to disintegrate the country. But Madhesis will not sit back and watch this time. We have resources. We have brilliant minds. Dim-wit Madhesi leaders just don’t represent us. Only if we had one leader, by leader I mean a leader, justice would have been done. Whole Madhes would have supported him/her wholeheartedly unlike these dimwitters, selfish, irrational leaders who cannot look beyond their own personal differences, let alone have a vision for Madhes to take Madhes forward. We need change. Change has seem to come in the US. Let’s just hope this wave of change will affect the southern plains of Nepal too.