Abstract

Background

The nurse-doctor relationship is historically one of female nurse deference to male
physician authority. We investigated the effects of physicians' sex on female nurses'
behaviour.

Methods

Nurses at an urban, university based hospital completed one of two forms of a vignette-based
survey in January, 2000. Each survey included four clinical scenarios. In form 1 of
the questionnaire the physicians described were female, male, female, and male. In
form 2, vignettes were identical but the physician sex was changed to male, female,
male, and female. Differences in responses to questions based on the sex of the physician
in each vignette were studied

Results

199 self-selected nurses completed the survey. The responses of 177 female respondents
and 11 respondents who did not specifiy their sex, and were assumed to be female based
on the overall sex ratio of respondents, were analysed. Persistent sex-role stereotypes
influenced the relationship between female nurses and physicians. Nurses were more
willing to serve and defer to male physicians. They approached female physicians on
a more egalitarian basis, were more comfortable communicating with them, yet more
hostile toward them.

Conclusion

When nurses and doctors are female, traditional power imbalances in their relationship
diminish, suggesting that these imbalances are based as much on gender as on professional
hierarchy. The effects of this change on the authority of the medical profession,
the role of nurses, and on patient care merit further exploration.

Keywords:

Background

The income, prestige, and authority of doctors in most western countries reflects
their omnipotence amongst health care professionals and their power within our society.
The power of physicians appears to arise from knowledge and social class. However,
concurrent with the increasing number of women entering medicine, there has been a
recent decrease in that power.[1] For example, a significant proportion of female family physicians reports being sexually
harassed by male patients.[2] Sexual harassment is an abusive behaviour perpetrated by those with power on the
more vulnerable. The victimization of female doctors could only occur if the offending
male patients saw their physicians as vulnerable women rather than powerful professionals,
that is, if gender rather than professional role was the primary determinant of power
in the relationship.

If female physicians are "women first" in the eyes of some male patients, do their
overwhelmingly female nurse colleagues also view them through a gender lens? How will
the increasing percentage of women in medicine change professional relationships between
doctors and nurses? This study examines whether the traditional authority of doctors
over nurses is eroded when that authority arises solely from profession and not from
gender.

Historically both the gendered role of nursing and the sex of nurses was almost exclusively
female. The profession primarily attracted working class or immigrant women whose
background fostered unquestioning obedience to authority. [3,4] The "doctor – nurse" game described by Stein (1967) indicated that despite the passage
of time, roles had not changed substantially. By showing initiative and making important
recommendations, while appearing to defer passively to the doctor's authority, nurses
could avoid usurping physician power and thus deflect open disagreement.[5] Stein revisited the nurse-doctor game in 1990 and argued that nurses had unilaterally
decided to stop playing. The change was, in part, attributed to an increasing number
of female physicians and male nurses, both of whom were unable to play. [6] Nurses' recent overt refusal to be dominated by physicians is also a reflection of
the decrease in power differentials between men and women in western society at large.

In contrast to nursing, the gender role and the practitioners of medicine one hundred
years ago were male. Physician education emphasized scientific expertise, autonomy,
and authority. [3,7] Although current medical education generally mentions teamwork and collaboration,
the emphasis remains unchanged.

Many nurses and physicians still overtly and covertly resist the equalization of power
that true teamwork requires. Salvage and Smith argue that while assertive nurses resent
being put down by doctors, physicians resent being challenged by nurses.[8] Obstacles to collaboration include gendered thinking [9], different styles of learning, models of working, regulatory mechanisms [10], role ambiguity, and incongruent expectations.[11]

There is limited research on interactions between female nurses and doctors. Nurses
generally experience greater satisfaction when communicating with female rather than
male physicians [12] and prefer a female managerial style.[13,14] Women doctors are perceived to be less demanding and more consultative in their approach.[15] Nurses doubt that physicians' sex affects their behaviour, although some admit anger
or disappointment when female physicians do not exceed the standards nurses set for
male physicians.[15] They deny any sexual chemistry that favours male physicians, despite the female doctors'
impression to the contrary. Some female nurses describe female doctors in stereotypic
terms such as "demanding", "domineering", and "bitchy".[16] Female physicians, on the other hand, resent both having to make extra efforts to
be nice to nurses, and devising conscious strategies to cultivate egalitarianism and
friendship. More than 80% feel that at some time in their careers they have experienced
unequal treatment [15,17], more intense scrutiny [18], or a lack of respect [19] from nurses because they (the doctors) were female. A recent Norwegian study examined
the physician's perspective on what happens to the doctor-nurse relationship when
both are women. Both male and female physicians thought the relationship was influenced
by the doctor's gender. Female doctors perceived that they received less respect or
help than did their male colleagues. The physicians interpreted this in two ways,
thinking that either nurses' wishes to reduce status differences between nurses and
physicians affect female doctors more than male, or that there is an "erotic game"
taking place between male doctors and female nurses.[20]

Method

Hypothesizing that the sex of the physician could affect nurses' behaviour, we examined
differences in the interaction between female nurses and female and male physicians.
A self selected population of nurses working in an urban, university based hospital
was asked to complete one of two forms of a three page questionnaire in Jan. 2000.
The questionnaire included four clinical vignettes reflecting some previously identified
areas of strain in the doctor nurse relationship.[15] In form 1 of the questionnaire the physicians described were female, male, female,
and male. In form 2 they were male, female, male and female. Scenarios were otherwise
identical and described common hospital activities. Participants were asked five point
Likert type questions about nurse physician interactions, their expectations, probable
actions, and feelings about the physicians. Open-ended comments have been noted and
quoted, but were not quantified.

The questionnaire was pre-tested amongst a small group of hospital nurses to assess
face and content validity. Criterion validity could not be tested as no appropriate
standard exists.

Letters explaining that the accompanying study's aim was to examine teamwork in a
hospital setting, that participation was voluntary, and that responses would be confidential
were left at all patient care planning areas (nursing desks) of the hospital. Registered
nurses were invited to complete the questionnaire. All surveys left at a specific
patient care planning area were of the same form. The two survey forms were randomly
distributed among hospital floors. Nurses were asked to return questionnaires, whether
completed or not, to an identified collection envelope, and to complete only one questionnaire.

Following the final collection date, letters explaining that responses to the two
forms of the questionnaire would be compared to identify differences in interactions
between nurses and physicians based on the doctor's sex, and describing the "nurse-doctor
game" were distributed.

Data were analysed using SPSS 9.0. The analysis compared the responses to each question
based on the sex of the physician in the particular vignette (ie responses to form
1 and form 2 of the questionnaire). Pearson chi-square analysis was used to test for
statistical significance (p < 0.05). In addition, a descriptive analysis was performed
on the comments made by respondents.

This study was approved by the Queen's University Health Sciences Ethics Review Board.

Results

Of the three hundred surveys printed, 265 were taken, 197 were returned completed,
2 were returned with no responses, and 66 were not returned. The overall response
was 74% (199 of 265 taken) and included approximately 22% of the 900 nurses employed
by the hospital.

The nurses' ages ranged from 21 to 63 years. The inpatient nursing specialties were
broadly represented amongst the 95% (n = 177) who indicated they were female, the
5% (n = 9) who were male, and the 11 respondents who did not specify. Based on the
overall sex ratio of respondents these 11 were assumed to be female and included in
the analysis.. Responses from men were excluded, leaving 188 surveys for inclusion
(95 surveys of form 1 and 93 of form 2).

In the first vignette a physician leaves a suture tray with needles at the bedside,
despite a department policy assigning cleanup responsibility to the user of any "sharps".
Female nurses expected physicians of either sex, to dispose of the needles (85.3%
– female physician, 86.0% – male physician, p = 0.97) but were significantly less
likely to remove the needles for female physicians (p < 0.05). Nurses expectations
of, and conflicts with physicians varied by sex. Those surveyed were more likely to
feel indifferent about a male physician, and negative about a female physician when
the nurse ultimately removed the needles herself (p < 0.01).

In vignette two, the nurse was interrupted while checking a patient's vital signs
and asked to do the same check on the doctor's patient. Nurses were equally unlikely
to immediately stop and help a female or male physician (p = 0.69). However assertive
requests by physicians were more likely to be acted upon if the physician were male
(p < 0.03) despite near universal resentment of this aggression (80% toward females,
and 77% toward males, p = 0.89). When physician requests for help were polite, nurses
felt positive toward both male and female physicians (68.5% toward females, and 65.1%
toward males, p = 0.33) but, as in vignette 1, were less likely to help the female
physician (p = 0.17).

The third vignette described a nurse and physician caring for an unresponsive newborn.
The nurse wonders if the physician remembers that the mother received meperidine (a
medication that could depress the baby's breathing and that could be reversed by giving
the baby naloxone) two hours previously. Nurses were more likely to suggest to the
physician that the newborn needed naloxone, (99% were likely or very likely to suggest
to female physicians and 97.8% for male physicians, p = 0.24), than they were to tell
the physician that the newborn needed naloxone (31.8% were likely or very likely to
tell a female physician and 26.1% for a male physician, p = 0.21). Again, though not
statistically significant in this case, there was a trend for nurses to be more forward
with female doctors. They were less likely to wait for a female doctor to make her
own decision about giving naloxone (p = 0.15), and more likely to suggest (p = 0.21)
or tell (p = 0.20) the female doctor to give the medication. Nurses also expected
female doctors would respond more positively to their suggestions (p < 0.04).

In the final vignette a doctor on call has just gone to sleep in her/his call room.
Nurses were asked if they would call the physician for an acetaminophen (an analgesic)
order. Responses to all questions lacked statistical significance. There was, however,
a consistent and contrary trend to that observed in the other scenarios. Nurses were
less likely to call a female physician than a male, regardless of whether the physician
had given the nurse a complement earlier in the day (p = 0.24), or had been rude earlier
on (p = 0.63). Nurses were more likely to feel that a male physician's anger was inappropriate
(p = 0.39). They were less comfortable approaching a female doctor to discuss her
anger (p = 0.38). In this vignette same sex, rather than opposite sex interactions
may have been somewhat more cooperative.

Discussion

In general, nurses' expectations of physicians of either sex were similar. Our findings
suggest, however, that the process of, and feelings around nurse physician interactions
are informed by gender stereotypes. In addition to professional hierarchy, gender
appears to account for physicians' perceived power over nurses. Although physicians
may well reinforce these same stereotypes this study did not examine their beliefs.
Overall, nurses' behaviour was influenced by the sex of the physician.

In vignette 1, those surveyed expected both male and female physicians to remove needles
left on a suture tray. They were, however, more willing to clean up after male physicians,
and to do so with indifference rather than with the hostility they directed toward
female doctors. Findings that nurses are statistically less likely to remove needles
for female doctors, and to feel somewhat more resentful toward female doctors for
whom they have cleaned up, speaks to the primacy of sex over hierarchy in defining
the doctor nurse relationship. Perhaps nurses feel role confusion because female physicians
do not fit into their learned male stereotypes, and instead better fit into traditionally
female roles such as "cleaner". These results corroborate Pringle's subjective findings
that nurses do more for male physicians and expect more of female physicians.[15]

That nurses were unlikely to drop everything to assist either a male or female physician
take a blood pressure is consistent with the increasing autonomy of the nursing profession.
Assertive physician requests met with resistance from these increasingly confident
nurses who commented, "Many times doctors feel they have the right to interrupt with
little to no consideration for the RNs. They feel their job is more important!" and,
"She is perfectly capable of doing vital signs." Pleasant requests for nursing help
were more effective. Again, however, sex role stereotypes appeared to enter the relationship
as nurses accepted aggressive male behaviour and acquiesced more readily to male requests
for help.

Responses to the third scenario suggest that the 'doctor-nurse game' [5,6] is alive and well. Nurses deferred to the physicians' status despite knowing what
was medically necessary, and would suggest, but not dictate, treatment for the unresponsive
baby. As one respondent wrote, "I would be more likely to phrase it in a way that
would make him feel in control." Nevertheless, there was again more deference to the
authority of male doctors.

In the final vignette, respondents showed a non-significant trend toward a more kindly
association with female than male physicians. At first this would seem contrary to
the preceding findings. This vignette, however was the only one of the four requiring
a nurse to initiate, rather than respond to an action. Perhaps nurses are hostile
and reactive to female physicians in situations where their expectations (often based
on sex stereotypes) are not met, such as when women fail to clean up after themselves.
However, when the nurse is in control, her less hierarchical relationship with another
female, despite the power differential of profession, may foster collegiality.

When doctors and nurses are both female, elimination of the power differential of
gender diminishes nurses' perceptions of professional power inequalities. As a result,
female nurses appear more comfortable approaching and communicating with female doctors,
but are also more hostile toward female physicians' use of medical authority. These
paradoxical behaviours will confuse female physicians if they view themselves as doctors
first, rather than as women, and expect nurses to interact with all physicians equally.
As females these same physicians may anticipate appreciation for their increased collaboration
and egalitarianism, and not understand the nurses' confusion at the lack of traditional
professional hierarchy. Perhaps the perception that female physicians are more caring
and compassionate than their male counterparts creates conflicts with nurses, who
define caring as their function, and may feel their role in health care delivery is
threatened by women physicians.[21]

In general, the nurses surveyed said they would resist being controlled by physicians.
This decrease in the power of medicine over nursing is concurrent with an increase
in the number of women physicians in North America. Although the feminization of medicine
could diminish the power and prestige of all physicians within the health care system,
our findings suggest that nurses are more resistant to domination by female, rather
than male doctors. Changes in power differentials between medicine and nursing appear
to be shaped by gender, suggesting that the traditional omnipotence of physicians
in the health care hierarchy arose from gender roles, and not solely from profession.

Study Limitations

Written responses may define socially desirable values rather than actual behaviours
in clinical situations, however the hostility toward physicians expressed in many
of the nurses' written comments (not reported here) mitigates against this concern.
Because the study was limited to hospital nurses and the scenarios were hospital based,
results may not be generaliseable. As with any study in which participants are self-selected
rather than randomly surveyed, selection bias is possible. Our relatively high response
rate (74%) minimizes, but does not preclude this limitation.

Conclusion

Historically, the power held by a predominantly male medical profession may have arisen
primarily from gender rather than from hierarchical position. Current relationships
between doctors and nurses appear to be shaped by gender as well as by profession.
When nurses and doctors are female the traditional power imbalance between the two
diminishes. The effects of this change on the authority of the medical profession,
the role of nurses, and on patient care remain undefined.

References

Riska E: Towards gender balance: but will women physicians have an impact on medicine?