On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 12:43:20AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 05:36:16PM -0500, James Chacon wrote:
> > Does it violate the principle of least surprise that the compiler is deciding
> > to call entirely different functions for me because it decided that was
> > "optimal" when all I did was specify -O2 or -O3?
>
> Not more than memcpy() being inlined and getting alignment restrictions
> that the "real" memcpy does not have.
At least it's still calling memcpy....
James