And that is the irony. When Jihadists threaten to kill, Twitter leaves them alone so they do not come across as islamophobes. But when I fight jihadists on twitter, they banned me and My account was/is suspended for good. Go figure. M

Heh! Well answering the phone is fine SAK but I can’t abide social media like FB and Twitter. I can’t even believe these things exist. Idiotic, right Artie. They’re really anti-social media. There’s no privacy anymore.

This woman is clearly a security threat, knowledge in the wrong hands can be really haramful & apparently MIT is filled with jihadists ….

Remember Afia Siddiqui fellow MIT alumni?

“In a bag she was carrying, the police found that she had a number of documents written in Urdu and English describing the creation of explosives, chemical weapons, Ebola, dirty bombs, and radiological agents (which discussed mortality rates of certain of the weapons), and handwritten notes referring to a “mass casualty attack” that listed various US locations and landmarks (including the Plum Island Animal Disease Center, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, the Brooklyn Bridge, and the New York City subway system), according to her indictment.[3][10][20][84] The Globe also mentioned one document about a ‘theoretical’ biological weapon that did not harm children.[15] She also reportedly had documents detailing US “military assets”, excerpts from The Anarchist’s Arsenal, a one-gigabyte digital media storage device that contained over 500 electronic documents (including correspondence referring to attacks by “cells”, describing the US as an enemy, and discussing recruitment of jihadists and training), maps of Ghazni and the provincial governor’s compounds and the mosques he prayed in, and photos of Pakistani military people.[3][9][10][19][20][85][86] Other notes described various ways to attack enemies, including by destroying reconnaissance drones, using underwater bombs, and using gliders.[9][10]

She also had “numerous chemical substances in gel and liquid form that were sealed in bottles and glass jars”, according to the later complaint against her,[3][10][19][20][85][87] and about two pounds of sodium cyanide, a highly toxic poison.[9][16] The US prosecutors later said that sodium cyanide is lethal even when ingested in small doses (even less than five milligrams), and various of the other chemicals she had can be used in explosives.[88] Abdul Ghani, Ghazni’s deputy police chief, said she later confessed that she intended to carry out a suicide attack against the provincial governor.[86]”

We’ll probably hear about her being arrested for terrorist activities. Nobody will care because, just as at Fort Hood, we cannot sacrifice diversity just because Muslims are vastly more likely to engage in terrorism than every other group in the world.

Wow. MIT.
Intelligent.
Informed.
And yet, too trusting.
I wonder what this intellectual powerhouse will do with his knowledge.
And I wonder if his instructors understand that they are, in effect, arming a potential terrorist.

Oops, I forget, Allah asks the muslims to do the dirty job (9:14), that is why it is useless asking Allah to kill somebody. I wonder why Allah can not do what Allah wants, even when Allah makes a promise, it must be with the words “if Allah’s willing”.

She also wants to murder staunch Anti-Jihadists Daniel Pipes and Geert Wilders. No one may speak out against Islam.

And “arrested”? Clearly, Obaid Karki envisions Shari’ah law in the US at some point—or perhaps she just considers Muslim assassins to be the law.

And why not? If the state is not enforcing Shari’ah, then any part of the Ummah may do so. We’ve already seen informal “religious police’ in Europe enforcing the wearing “modesty” in “Muslim areas”.

How long before they become more violent?

And speaking of Shari’ah, here’s more from Obaid Karki on her Twitter feed, crudely sneering at both Joy Brighton and the US Constitution.

Joy Brighton is a liberal who has come to at least *partially* understand the threat of Islam. Ridiculously, she refers to it as “Shari’ah-ism”—but even this is too close to the truth for pious Muslims like Obaid Karki.

Karki also urges Boko Haram not to release the girls they have abducted and gang-raped. She describes this, oddly, as their “war against the West”. Never mind that none of the victims are “Western”. She pretends that this is all some sort of protest against Shell Oil.

I’m not sure it’s a woman. It is a very strange collection of social media. Also the account tweets what would seem too frequently and repetitively to seem like the product of a female psyche. I think it could be more insidious than the ramblings of some female Muslim fanatic working at MIT. That is the profile they want you to believe. But it’s not believable.

We have to ask:
1. do we favor the rights of religious institutions, or
2. do we favor the right of the individual to worship in the first place.
If we weight our interpretation of the 1st Amendment toward the second objective, then we’re safe.
Privilege religious institutions and we’re finished.

As a Christian living in a free society, I have the right to say that Islam is profane.
And I do.
And I believe that it is.
Respect my beliefs and all is well.
I really think another civil war could be fought in this country over the Islamization of the society, should it happen.
Now, it may not and we may be spared.
But given the wild-eyed love of conquest I’ve seen in Muslim history, and the enthusiasm many modern Muslims have for re-living the gorgeous past, I’m not so sure.

Ida Wells Brown understood that lynching denies and undermines the rule of law. Look at the case against Southern lynching, it can be made handily against the Muslim tendency toward lawless action upon the infidel.
To impose Sharia, culturally or otherwise, is to undermine secular law.
To silence any infidel is indeed to impose Sharia.

These comments are unacceptable and this person should be investigated by law enforcement. This type of calling for violence against those who disagree is typical under islam/muslim/mohammedan culture. disagreement = murder

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Robert Spencer’s Free Speech Book

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.