Blog Archives

Updated: April 11th 2018

Are you starting to suffer from #DraftTwitter mock draft fatigue? Honestly, I am. There are so many mock drafts out there that I’ve actually found myself tuning out and avoiding those tweets, articles, blog posts, etc. Instead, I started to work on my own NFL mock draft. Mocking is a great way to force yourself to do some research and make qualitative decisions about specific players. It’s also the best way to define your own opinions on the players, rather than relying on the #DraftTwitter groupthink.

Here’s the method to my madness… I started out by creating positional rankings and tiers for each position, concentrating on players who could potentially be drafted in the Top 100. Next, I consulted my preferred team needs resource which was a community effort on the r/NFL_Draft subreddit. The spreadsheet collects info about primary and secondary team needs, scheme, draft strategy and character risk tolerance. While it may not be perfect, I think it’s more useful than most similar sites and is far better than I could compile on my own. Next, I referred to Our Lads depth charts which are my favorite (you should also bookmark their glossary). For some teams I also visited Spotrac to get invaluable information about contracts and free agency. To keep track of my picks, I am using the mock draft spreadsheet created by Reddit user Mbrr1214, to which I made a few slight tweaks. Team names are color coded for quick recognition; colored pick numbers correspond to the pick’s original owner.

A few notes before we get started…

This mock draft was compiled predominantly on March 30-31 with some edits in the following days. It will be posted in pieces over the three weeks leading up to the NFL Draft so please keep in mind the dates in which it was first created should there be any breaking news in the interim.

My knowledge of offensive skill players far outpaces that of offensive linemen and defensive players. That’s not to say I haven’t seen the other players play, it’s just that my analysis is more shallow. I covered many of these linemen and defensive players during the season and during my bowl previews but I have admittedly not done a deep study.

I did not include any trades which can obviously turn this mock draft on its head. Personally, I think mock drafts that include trades are a cop-out and a way for the author to skirt around tough decisions. Real GMs may not always have the option of trading out of a pick and must make a decision on whether they go BPA (Best Player Available) or reach to fill a team need. For a mock draft author to say “well, Quenton Nelson is the best player on the board, let’s trade this pick to a team that needs a guard” is missing the point of the exercise.

What Did I Learn?

I’ve done mock drafts before but never a full two rounder with “honorable mentions.” I walked away with a few insights:

More quarterbacks will be drafted than you think and they will be drafted earlier than you hoped.

Solid offensive tackle prospects are becoming less common and, as such, teams will have to reach for them nearly as often as they do for quarterbacks.

If I had to build my own team, I would rarely use a top 75 pick on a running back or wide receiver. Offensive skill players, aside from the quarterbacks, fell much further down my mock than anticipated.

Honorable Mentions

These players did not get selected in my mock but I had originally listed them as potential targets when I started my research. Since I considered them while working on this project, I thought I should share their names as they could be some of the top targets in Rounds 3 and 4. They are ordered by position then by last name – they are not ranked.

Welcome to the 2018 NFL Mock Draft…

#64 – Browns – Kemoko Turay, EDGE, Rutgers

Homer pick alert. With my last pick in my two-round mock, and the first one that you’re reading, I have the Browns taking Kemoko Turay. As a Rutgers season ticket holder, I have been both enticed by and disappointed by Turay. His blocked field goal against Michigan in 2014 remains one of my favorite football moments ever experienced in person at the stadium. The “Kemoko Dragon” performed well at the Senior Bowl and became a darling of one of my favorite draft resources: NDT Scouting. NDT had numerouspieces highlighting Turay around the Senior Bowl but I feel like his name has fizzled a bit as of late. Turay’s career stats are marred by injuries and ineffectiveness but he has raw ability that teams covet. I use the word raw on purpose because he definitely needs some work. His senior season at Rutgers was a pretty good one: 60 tackles, 6 tackles for loss, 3 sacks. Edge rusher is not a position of immediate need for the Browns, but when you five of the first 64 picks, you can afford a luxury pick or two. The depth chart ahead of him is why I would love to see Turay taken by the Browns. He can come in and learn while he bulks up. Given time, I think that Turay will be a starting end in the league.

#63 – Patriots – Kyle Lauletta, QB, Richmond

Rumors are swirling that the Patriots might take a quarterback late in the first round. I think it’s more likely that they take one here at pick #63 (mostly because I doubt they hold onto both of those late first rounders). If the Patriots pull the trigger in the first round, it would be for Mason Rudolph, whereas if they wait until the second I think it would be Kyle Lauletta. Lauletta played at Richmond in the Colonial Athletic Association in the FCS. Lauletta threw for 3,737 yards and 28 TDs last season, adding 4 rushing TDs. Lauletta has a career completion percentage of 63.5% and improved his accuracy each year as the starter. He does throw too many interceptions though, 35 over the last three seasons. My first look at Lauletta came in the lead up to the Senior Bowl when I read Benjamin Solak’s “Contextualized Quarterbacking” piece about the Senior Bowl quarterbacks. He went on to win the MVP award at the Senior Bowl, moving himself up draft boards. I went back and re-read Lauletta’s section and two words confirmed for me that the Patriots would target him: “mechanically pure.” In case you were wondering, the Pats took Jimmy Garoppolo, an FCS quarterback who thew too many interceptions but had a quick release, with pick #62 in 2014.

#62 – Vikings – Braden Smith, G, Auburn

The most immediate need that I identified for the Vikings was their offensive line. I wanted to address the line with both of their first two picks, hopefully ensuring that new QB Kirk Cousins can last for the duration of his fully guaranteed contract. Smith is my highest rated lineman on the board at this point so it was an easy pick. He was an AP All-American in 2017 and starred at the combine. Smith came in as the biggest guard (6’6″ and 315lbs) in the class. He also had the highest vertical jump and came in second in the bench press and broad jump. He’s big enough and athletic enough to hold his own across the line so he could prove to be a valuable addition to the Vikings offense.

#61 – Jaguars – Michael Gallup, WR, Colorado St

I was surprised when the Jaguars let Allen Robinson leave in free agency and then cut Allen Hurns. I figured they would at least hold onto one of them. Instead, they decided to re-sign Marqise Lee and add Donte Moncrief from the Colts. Moncrief is now the highest paid receiver on the team, but they must not be too convinced because they only gave him a one year deal. Michael Gallup has an interesting personal story which I wrote about a few weeks ago. He had numerous Power 5 scholarship offers but his test scores were not good enough so he had to go the JUCO route and then ended up at Colorado State. If he had played at a school like Missouri originally, we could be talking about the top receiver in the class. Some experts still feel that way about Gallup and trust his pedigree over his route to the pros. I like Gallup but he has a few negatives that bump him down for me. Primarily, he lacks elite measureables and is prone to losing focus. There’s a lot to like though so that seems like nit-picking. Gallup plays faster than his 4.51 forty indicates. He is good with the ball in his hands after the catch, utilizing his all-around athletic ability (he earned sixteen varsity letters in high school). I believe Gallup’s play strength is better than advertised which will be a useful trait as he adds weight for the NFL. If Lee continues to ascend as he did in 2017, and Moncrief proves he’s not a bust, the Jaguars could be looking at an under the radar receiving corps this year.

#60 – Steelers – Darius Leonard, LB, South Carolina St

Similarly to the 49ers below, the Steelers brass would not have expected to need to spend draft capital on an inside linebacker if you had asked them a few months ago. Unfortunately, though, that is the reality after Ryan Shazier’s frightening spinal injury. Shazier says he’ll play again but I think it’s safe to say that that will not be any time soon. You’re forgiven if you have never heard of Darius Leonard. Leonard is a fifth year senior from South Carolina State, a 3-7 MEAC side. I had heard the name a few months back but never did any research so I decided to watch one of his 2017 game films and a highlight reel as a quick primer. Against FCS foe NC Central, he often looked like the best player on the field, showing good speed, especially to the sideline. He is effective in coverage and plays a great QB spy because he has the quickness to shadow the passer and then meet him at the edge. Leonard tallied 100+ tackles each of the last two seasons and is an adept pass rusher despite his coverage responsibilities (20 career sacks). Leonard will likely compete with free agent signing Jon Bostic for a starting role. Bostic is on his fifth team in five years so I’d put my money on the rookie.

#59 – 49ers – Malik Jefferson, LB, Texas

The thought of the 49ers drafting a linebacker in the second round of the 2018 draft would have seemed a little crazy eleven months ago. Fast forward though and it’s possible that San Fran needs to plan for a future without MLB Reuben Foster. Foster was arrested twice this offseason and missed six games due to various injuries in 2017. When researching his off-field issues, I also came across a story about him getting sent home from the combine last year which I had forgotten all about. Jefferson would be a good pick for the 49ers because he could fill the MLB slot until Foster returns from an anticipated suspension. Jefferson’s best position, according to Charlie Campbell and Lance Zierlein, may end up being at WLB. The projected starter at that spot for the 49ers is Malcolm Smith who missed all of 2017 with a torn pectoral. Either way, whether it’s in the middle or on the weak side, Jefferson will prove valuable from Day One.

#58 – Falcons – Tim Settle, DT, Virginia Tech

This feels a little early for Settle because I had at least one other DT ranked above him, however, he fits a more immediate need for the Falcons at NT. The Falcons signed Dontari Poe to a one year deal in 2017 and let him move on to division rival Carolina this offseason. Settle is big at 6’3″ and 329lbs and would be a space eater for the Falcons. Settle is a former 5-star recruit who was ranked by ESPN as the 19th best overall recruit in his class and the second best at the position. In college, he never really “settled” in. He’s a redshirt sophomore so maturity and experience are a concern, as is his low level of production. Settle has just four career sacks, all coming in 2017, and 53 career tackles. The Falcons are a pretty complete team so I think it’s best for them to address a need, even if it may be a bit of a reach.

#57 – Titans – Taven Bryan, DT/DE, Florida

Any time somebody draws comparisons to JJ Watt, you should take note. When researching Bryan, I came across multiplesources running with the comp, including the NFL Research Twitter account. Bryan’s production continued to increase in 2017, when he finished with career highs in snaps, sacks, quarterback hits and hurries. Bryan played as a DT in a 4-3 at Florida and will likely play DE in 3-4 sets with the Titans. I expect the Titans to use multiple sets though so Bryan could move inside when they switch to a 4-3. I also envision Bryan playing inside of the 3-4 on passing downs to give offenses a different look and increase pass rush pressure. Bryan blew away the DT class with his explosiveness and agility at the combine, leading in four drills: vertical jump, broad jump, shuttle and 3-cone.

#56 – Bills – Billy Price, G/C, Ohio State

This is Buffalo’s fourth pick in the first two rounds. Earlier I have them address quarterback, wide receiver and linebacker. With #56, I wanted the Bills to make a value pick for the future. If Billy Price didn’t tear a pectoral muscle at the combine, he would have been a late first round prospect. Price can play at either guard position or center, as he did for the Buckeyes, but I’d expect him to find a home as an NFL center. Sadly, starter Eric Wood was forced to retire after last season due to an injury so the Bills could use a long term solution at the position. They did sign Russell Bodine from Cincinnati last month but it’s just a two year deal with a potential out after 2018. That would be perfect timing to give Price time to recover before becoming the permanent starter in 2019.

#55 – Panthers – Anthony Miller, WR, Memphis

Miller is my favorite player in this draft class. His measureables don’t stand up to others in the class, which is why we find him at #55 and not at the top of the second, but I’m not deterred. Miller’s release is superb and he makes the spectacular catch look routine with excellent body control. In addition to his playmaking ability, Miller has repeatedly impressed me with his toughness and determination. There were times when he willed the Tigers to comeback or to victory, often exhausted or banged up. He has the versatility to line up anywhere and was Pro Football Focus’ sixth ranked slot receiver in 2017. With Devin Funchess and Torrey Smith on the field with him this season, I would anticipate seeing Miller in the slot. In terms of Miller’s long term projection, this fit works well because I doubt that either Smith or Funchess stick around long.

#54 – Chiefs – Josh Sweat, EDGE, Florida State

I was of two minds when considering the Chiefs first pick of the 2018 draft (they traded their first rounder in the deal to land Pat Mahomes last year). My first thought was that the Chiefs should be cautious, opting for a sure thing since they are missing a first rounder. My second thought was that because they were missing that first rounder that they should be more aggressive and make a high risk, high reward pick. My id won out and here we have Josh Sweat. Sweat is a complicated prospect because he has a history of knee injuries that make him a risk. Those injuries though are the only reason that Sweat would be available to the Chiefs at this pick. A player with Sweat’s combine measureables (4.53 40 yard dash at 6’4″ and 251lbs) and production (29 career tackles for loss and 14.5 career sacks) would not normally be available here.

#53 – Bills – Josey Jewell, LB, Iowa

It’s startling how little draft capital the Bills have invested in the linebacker position. Only two of the seven backers currently on the roster were drafted, the rest were all college free agents. Those two who were drafted, Matt Milano and Tanner Vallejo, were fifth and sixth rounders last year. The Bills drafted the position this high twice before in recent memory, in 2013 and 2016, but both Reggie Ragland and Kiko Alonso were traded away. Jewell is the next up in my linebacker rankings and he would be a good fit at MLB in the Bills system. It’s fun reading scouting reports on Jewell and seeing how the author tries to tiptoe around the fact that Jewell is simply unathletic. However, he is quite productive: he recorded 124 or more tackles each of the last three years. In his write up about Jewell, Matt Miller said that “all those hyperbolic cliches like ‘tackling machine’ actually apply to Jewell.” If history is any indication, Jewell may not be long for Buffalo but I’m confident that he would make an impact before his subsequent trade.

#52 – Ravens – Martinas Rankin, T/C, Mississippi State

The Ravens offensive line ranked 18th in 2017 according to Pro Football Focus. Perhaps that should come as a surprise given that the Ravens spend the 28th most, on a per player average, on the offensive line. The team spends even less at center where they rank 29th in spending. Rankin is a versatile lineman who played tackle in college but could end up playing center in the pros. The Bulldogs tried him out at center last Spring but kept him at tackle instead. Drafting a player like Rankin would give the Ravens a lot of flexibility and could help solidify the line both at tackle and center, wherever the immediate need is.

#51 – Lions – James Daniels, C, Iowa

The Lions need a center and James Daniels is a damn good one. Last year’s starting center, Travis Swanson, has signed with the Jets. The Lions did sign G/C Wesley Johnson, ironically from the Jets but he doesn’t really satisfy the team need. Johnson is a former tackle who moved inside for the NFL, he’s not a true center. Neither is guard Graham Glasgow who would project as the starting center for Detroit this year if they don’t address the position. While doing some research on Daniels, I came across this highlight where he owns a BC linebacker and I couldn’t help but watch it a number of times. Daniels came in smaller than some of the other top center prospects but he showed his supreme agility by owning the competition in the shuttle and 3-cone.

#50 – Cowboys – D.J. Moore, WR, Maryland

There’s been a number of rumors that the Cowboys are considering a wide receiver with their first pick, specifically Calvin Ridley I think that would be a mistake, even though Ridley is my highest rated receiver, and sincerely hope they continue to add to their already-strong offensive line instead. I’d much rather see the Cowboys wait, full disclosure that I’m a fan, and grab a receiver at this pick. I have Anthony Miller ranked higher in my rankings at the moment but I think that Moore is the more likely selection for the ‘Boys. Per WalterFootball.com, Moore has met with the Cowboys on multiple occasions. Moore was not on my watch list to start the season but by the end of it he had worked his way into my positional rankings. Moore is quick (4.42 speed) and explosive (first among WRs in the broad jump, second in the vertical) and runs with purpose once he has the ball in his hands. He had awful quarterback play at Maryland so the fact that he performed as well as he did at times is impressive. In my preview of Moore, I called him a “trick play master” which could come in handy when the Cowboys offense becomes predictably run-heavy.

#49 – Colts – Nick Chubb, RB, Georgia

I believe there’s zero chance that the Colts head into training camp with just Marlon Mack, Christine Michael, Josh Ferguson, Robert Turbin and Matt Jones competing for running back reps. They are a lock to add a running back in the first few rounds. Mack should be the favorite to come out of that group but I don’t think he’s able to be a bellcow and none of the journeyman inspire confidence. Chubb was pegged as the top back of this class years ago as a freshman but he has since fallen down the rankings due to an ACL injury and sharing the spotlight with Sony Michel. I still prefer Chubb to Michel as a pro prospect but I do admit that Chubb’s running style likely means he’ll serve a shorter career. Chubb had three 1,000+ yard seasons and averaged 6.3 yards per carry over 47 games. His 44 career rushing TDs are fourth most in the SEC since 1956, per Sports-Reference. Chubb is not a receiving back but that’s okay because that’s Mack’s strength. The biggest knock on Chubb is his ACL injury from 2016. I’m not that concerned because he returned and completed two full seasons since then, even if he has lost some of his pop. Having a formidable running back duo will help Andrew Luck get back into form because the team will not have to rely solely on him to move the offense.

Note: When watching film for a player in the offseason, I typically pick two games at random to watch. If game film is not available I will search for highlight reels, but keep in mind these are the best plays that player had all season so they really need to jump off the screen. I do not necessarily want to watch games where they did very well or very poorly as that may not be a great illustration of their true ability. If possible, when comparing players at the same position I also like to watch film against common opponents. Full disclosure, I am not watching film of every single game any player plays, instead I am looking for a representative sample. When researching college players I use a number of resources, I would recommend bookmarking the below sites…

Robert F. Cowper is a freelance writer who lives in New Jersey. Robert works as a recreation professional, specializing in youth sports, when he isn’t acting as commissioner for his many fantasy sports leagues.

Updated: December 21st 2017

Welcome to The Watch List, a resource to help RSO owners identify the storylines, players and matchups from the college game that deserve your attention. To view my weekly picks, follow me on Twitter @robertfcowper. During the college bowl season, The Watch List will continue to update you on who is fantasy relevant and worth your draft capital next year. Note: times listed are Eastern.

“Buzz, your girlfriend, woof.” That’s how I’m feeling about this one. Florida State just barely managed bowl eligibility after a late season makeup game against UL-Monroe. They lost pro prospect QB Deondre Francois in the season opener and struggled with freshman James Blackman under center since. They also lost head coach Jimbo Fisher who, mistakenly in my opinion, abandoned Tallahassee for College Station. FSU will be playing the Independence Bowl without another potential pro: safety Derwin James. James has decided to skip the bowl in order to preserve his NFL Draft stock; expect James to be in consideration for a Top 10 pick in April although he was surpassed by Alabama’s Minkah Fitzpatrick as the top defensive back prospect. If you’re looking for a reason to tune in to watch the Seminoles, check out freshman RB Cam Akers, WR Auden Tate and CB Tavarus McFadden. McFadden will likely come out but his stock has definitely been dented by the team’s subpar season. McFadden himself disappointed too going from 8 INTs in 2016 to zero in 2017. He’s not great in run support (just 27 tackles this season) so he needs to remind scouts that he has ball skills. Akers has been streaky this season but I would attribute that more to poor quarterback play than anything else. He finished the season with a strong game against UL-Monroe (117 yards, 2 TDs) to give him a solid 931-7 line for the year; interestingly, he has not had a reception in the last three games. Tate has just 60 receptions, 873 yards and 13 TDs in his career (35-464-7 this season) but is still an NFL Draft prospect because of his size (6’5″ and 225lbs) and ability to make contested catches.

Southern Mississippi is led by JUCO transfer QB Kwadra Griggs. He has 15 TDs to just 2 INTs plus 2 rushing TDs. Griggs started the year sharing the starting role and suffered a hand injury but since a dismal game against Tennessee he has played well (722 yards, 7 TDs, 0 INT). I’m a bigfan of South Miss RB Ito Smith. He’s undersized at 5’9″ 195lbs but he’s durable (50 career games). He’s a true three down back because he is a good receiver (36 for 370 and 2 scores this season) and a good pass blocker (94.6% pass blocking efficiency per Pro Football Focus). Back in Week 8, I predicted that Smith might be the 2018 version of Kareem Hunt and Tarik Cohen for fantasy owners: an underappreciated prospect whose pass catching skill ensures he gets on the field early in his career.

Despite my love of Smith, FSU just has the better athletes. Prediction: Florida State

No team influenced the College Football Playoff picture more than Iowa did with their blowout of #5 Ohio State. If it weren’t for that loss, the Buckeyes could be playing for a national championship. The Hawkeyes are led by three guys who will be playing on Sundays next year: CB Joshua Jackson, LB Josey Jewell and RB Akrum Wadley. Jackson offers solid run support (47 tackles), has good instincts when the ball is in the air (7 INTs, 18 passes defended) and is incredibly clutch. In the two biggest games Iowa played this season, against Ohio State and Wisconsin, Jackson combined for 6 tackles, 1 forced fumble, 1 pass defended, 5 INTs and 2 return touchdowns. One of those interceptions against Ohio State was an OBJ-esque one-hander; another was a hard fought battle with the receiver where he had the strength to rip the ball from the receiver’s hands. Those two games established him as a Top 10 CB heading into the 2018 draft. Josey Jewell enjoyed an equally impressive season that buoyed his draft stock. Jewell has 120+ tackles in three straight seasons and is the conference’s #2 career tackler since 2005 (when www.sports-reference.com/cfb started tracking the record). Jewell also set career highs for tackles for loss, sacks and passes defended on his way to being named the 2017 Big Ten Defensive Player of the Year. Jewell trusts his instincts and play recognition which allows him to be the first to the hole or the ball carrier on most plays. RB Akrum Wadley leads the offense. He went over 1,000 yards again this season (1,021) but his yards per carry did decrease from 6.4 to 4.4. He’s also a factor in the passing game with 62 receptions, 644 yards and 6 TDs over the last two years. In my 2018 fantasy draft positional rankings I had Wadley at RB9 and would expect him to stay in the RB8-12 range when I update in the offseason.

Boston College’s best weapon is freshman RB AJ Dillon, other than that the cupboard is pretty bare on offense. Starting QB Anthony Brown is out for the rest of the season (and wasn’t particularly effective anyway). Career backup QB Darius Wade had his best game of his career in the season finale against Syracuse: 16-20, 248 yards and 1 TD. Because of Brown’s ineffectiveness, the Eagles don’t have a WR of note (the leading receiver was Kobay White with 32-396-4). Dillon has gained 1,432 yards (#2 in the ACC) on 268 attempts (#1 in the ACC). Oddly, he doesn’t have a single reception; he had the most carries of any FBS back without a single catch. Dillon has a rare combination of size (6’0″ and 240lbs) and speed (4.55 range coming out of high school) that compares to Leonard Fournette’s combine measureables. Dillon has a way to go before we’re considering him for the NFL Draft but I’m optimistic. Unfortunately, DE Harold Landry likely will not play in this one. Landry will be a first round pick in the Spring but his stock has decreased due injury and decreased production.

Despite them having the same record, I don’t have a doubt about this one: Iowa is the better team. Prediction: Iowa

In late October, it would have been tough to predict these two teams matching up in the Foster Farms Bowl. Arizona was 4-1 in the conference (6-2 overall) and looking like a serious contender for the division. Purdue meanwhile was 3-5 and coming off their third straight loss. The fortunes for both teams changed though from that point forward. Arizona lost three of their last four while Purdue won three of four. So, here we are.

Purdue head coach Jeff Brohm was one of the many coaches in the running for Tennessee’s opening. Brohm stayed put and used the courting as a bargaining chip to get a better contract. Brohm has used a two-quarterback rotation throughout the season featuring David Blough (1,103 yards, 65% completion percentage, 9 TDs, 4 INTs) and Elijah Sindelar (1,730 yards, 55.6% completion percentage, 14 TDs, 6 INTs). Blough suffered a serious knee injury against Illinois on November 4 and will not factor in here. In the three games without Blough, Sindelar has thrown the ball a ton: 126 attempts. In those three games he has 7 TDs and just 1 INT. Sindelar’s best game came against #25 Iowa when he went 22-37 for 229 yards and 3 TDs. Hindsight is always 20/20 but maybe if Brohm stuck with Sindelar all season they could have been better than 6-6. The Boilermakers have a quartet of backs with 250+ yards each, the leader of which is junior Markell Jones (480 yards, 1 TD, 11 receptions). On defense, Purdue is led by LB Markus Bailey. Bailey is a redshirt sophomore and likely doesn’t have enough hype to come out in 2018 but if he continues to improve we’ll see him drafted in 2019 or 2020. This season Bailey has an impressive stat line of: 78 tackles, 10 tackles for loss, 7 sacks, 1 INT, 2 passes defended, 1 forced fumble and 1 fumble recovery.

Arizona has two players that I wanted to highlight: QB Khalil Tate and CB Lorenzo Burns. Burns is a redshirt freshman so he’s not draft eligible but his stats caught my eye. He has 75 total tackles which is a lot for a corner. He also has 5 INTs which led the PAC-12. Tate took over the starting role in October and led the team to four straight victories. He’s not the best passer but he’s efficient enough to keep the offense on the field until he can make a big play with his legs. Tate threw for more than 200 yards just once this season and averages about 150 yards per game. Amazingly, he actually has more yards rushing (1,353) than passing (1,289) on the year. He has 9 passing TDs and 12 rushing TDs. Tate’s biggest game of the year came against Colorado when he racked up 327 yards rushing and 4 TDs. Something that is worth noting: Tate only has 60 total rushing yards over the last two regular season games. I did not watch him in either contest so I cannot say whether it was due to scheme or maybe he has a minor injury.

This game is a toss-up for me so I’ll take the team featuring the best player on the field and that will be Khalil Tate. Prediction: Arizona

The Texas Bowl features two former conference foes in Texas and Missouri. The teams last faced off in Big 12 play in 2011 before Mizzou left for the SEC; Texas leads the all-time series at 15-4 (not that it matters, these players were all in middle school, but it’s just interesting to see teams matching up with so many prior meetings in a bowl game). Despite the teams having a combined 13-11 record, I found quite a few interesting storylines to research.

Texas started the season with sophomore QB Shane Buechele as the starter but they have gone back and forth between him and freshman Sam Ehlinger due to injury. Neither guy has been great: they combine for 3,153 yards, 16 TDs and 11 INTs. Based on the raw passing stats, Beuchele is the better play in the bowl game but Ehlinger offers a dimension as a rusher (364 yards, 2 TDs). Since the start of bowl practices, both quarterbacks have reportedly been getting first team work. My money would be on Ehlinger since he was the primary passer in the team’s last two games (66 attempts to Buechele’s nine). WR Colin Johnson will be the main target no matter who is under center. Johnson is huge (6’6″ 220lb) but just a sophomore so thankfully he’ll have another season to improve before hearing the siren song of the NFL Draft. Johnson has 79 receptions, 1,050 yards and 5 TDs so far in his career – not amazing but encouraging given the struggles of the Texas offense the last two seasons. The Longhorn running game is a mess. Ehlinger is actually the team’s leading rusher by both attempts and yards, although he’s not very efficient as he averages just 3.5 yards per attempt. Chris Warren, a big and bruising back who was slowed by injuries early in his career but looked promising, changed positions mid-season and is now transferring. Freshman RB Daniel Young finished the season as the lead back with 58 rushes for 238 yards and 2 TDs over the last four games. Leading the defense is LB Malik Jefferson who is one of the nation’s leading prospects at ILB. Jefferson has 110 tackles this season. Jefferson flashed in my eyes when playing against Sam Darnold and USC early in the season (he had 11 tackles and 2 tackles for loss). He had six double-digit tackle games on the season and added four sacks. Jefferson measures in at 6’3″ and 240lbs with a projected speed of 4.72 per NFLDraftScout.com. Similar size and speed comps include a number of key IDP players: Sean Lee, Kiko Alonso, Blake Martinez and Nick Vigil. Phil Steele’s preview magazine listed him as the #1 ILB for 2018 while NFLDraftScout.com has him listed as their #2 ILB in Jefferson’s 2019 class. Chances are that he comes out and that he is a Top 15 pick.

Missouri’s season has been one of streaks. They started the season with a loss over FCS also-ran Missouri State then lost five straight then won six straight. Stories of the team’s turnaround all point to head coach Barry Odom as the rock that keep the team on track despite the struggles. I don’t know Odom from Adam but it seems that the players love and respect him so that’s what matters. Throughout Missouri’s winning streak, I continually wanted to spotlight QB Drew Lock but I never got the chance. Lock is a three year starter who has improved on his stats year over year. In 2017 he finished the regular season with 3,695 yards, 43 TDs and 12 INTs. His completion percentage could be better (just 58.2%) but there is enough potential there to consider him as a draft prospect. Lock is listed at 6’4″ and 225lb and will run in the 4.80-4.90 range at the combine should he declare. Unfortunately, there aren’t many good comps in that size range, the best likely being AJ McCarron. McCarron did not produce like Lock has though. Lock led the SEC this year in attempts, yards and passing touchdowns (he also led the FBS in passing touchdowns). I’ll do more research and film study on Lock in the offseason if he declares, for now he’s definitely a player to watch. Lock’s top target is WR J’Mon Moore. In three years with Lock throwing him the ball, Moore has totaled 151 receptions, 2,389 yards and 21 TDs. His production in 2016 and 2017 was nearly identical, essentially 60 receptions and 1,000 yards. Moore won’t be a draftable WR fantasy rookie but could get late round NFL Draft consideration because of his height (6’3″).

I think Texas’ defense will outperform their 108th ranking and that they’ll slow Lock enough to keep the game close just not close enough. Prediction: Missouri

Since I was using Sports-Reference.com’s “Rivalry Finder” tool to look up the Texas/Missouri matchup I figured I might as well check out Virginia/Navy as well since that felt like a natural rivalry given the geography and military connections (it’s no coincidence the Military Bowl picked either team when given the chance). Turns out that the teams have met 33 times in their history but not since 1994. For what it’s worth, Navy leads the “rivalry” 23-10.

Navy is coming off a tough loss to Army on December 15 so there could be a bit of a “hangover” in this one. Even aside from the Army loss in the snow, the Midshipmen have been cold as of late, winning just one of the last seven. As most casual college football fans know, Navy, like the other service academies, runs a rush heavy triple-option offense. So, it’s no surprise to see Navy with two 1,000+ yard rushers (and another at 500+). What might be surprising is just how often the quarterback keeps the ball, eschewing his two other options. Junior QB Zach Abey leads the team with 1,325 yards rushing and 14 TDs (plus 805 yards and 7 TDs passing). Abey missed time during the season with both a concussion and a shoulder injury. In his stead, sophomore QB/WR Malcolm Perry emerged as the primary playmaker. If you watched the Army vs Navy game, you’ll no doubt remember Perry. Perry is not a threat to pass (just two attempts) but he is electric with the ball in his hands, so much so that when Abey was healthy Navy got Perry involved as a a receiver (13-303-2) and as a kick returner (24.5 yards per return). Even if Abey is fully healthy, expect to see more of Perry.

Bronco Mendenhall’s Cavaliers improved significantly after a 2-10 campaign last season. It’s the first time UVA has been bowl eligible since 2011 and just the second time in a decade. Leading the offense is senior QB Kurt Benkert. Honestly, I did not know Benkert’s name to start the season but he had enough success this year (3,062 yards and 25 TDs) that he’s been getting somebuzz. I have not watched Benkert’s film so the bowl will be a good introduction against Navy’s mediocre pass defense. Benkert’s favorite target is the versatile Olamide Zaccheaus. Zaccheaus has 80 receptions for 833 yards and 5 TDs while adding 182 rushing yards and a rushing score. Earlier in his career he also returned kicks and even threw a touchdown pass in 2015. He’s the type of player that offensive coordinators love scheming for. On defense, UVA features two mid-round NFL Draft prospects in LB Micah Kiser (132 tackles, 5 sacks this season) and S Quin Blanding (120 tackles, 4 INTs this season). Both players are mutli-year starters who have nearly 900 career tackles between them. Kiser and Blanding will be key against the Navy rushing attack. In their November 11 matchup, Virginia held the Georgia Tech triple-option offense to just 220 yards. Just 220 yards you ask? It may sound like a lot but it’s the fourth lowest total of the season for Tech, so Virginia’s defense played well considering. In that game, Kiser had 18 tackles while Blanding had just three but added an interception.

This one may be a home game for Navy but I believe UVA has the better athletes all over the field. Prediction: Virginia

It’s not quite the “Grandaddy of them all” as Keith Jackson would say, but this Big Ten vs PAC-12 matchup is a good one. I’m a Michigan and Rutgers fan, a Big Ten apologist and huge Rose Bowl fan. My favorite pieces of memorabilia are a program and press pass from the 1998 Rose Bowl when Michigan won a share of the national championship; I found the pieces in a used bookstore in Ann Arbor, bought them immediately and had them framed. So, you can see I’m a sucker for a Big Ten vs PAC-12 matchup. I’ll call this one Rose Bowl Lite.

Michigan State’s mediocre offense is led by QB Brian Lewerke and RB LJ Scott. Lewerke is a redshirt sophomore who is starting for the first time this season. He has 2,580 yards, 17 TDs and 6 INTs plus 489 yards rushing and 5 rushing TDs. Lewerke finished mid-pack in the conference in most passing statistics so he’s solid but he’s not on the level of recent Spartan QBs like Conor Cook and Kirk Cousins. Scott started the year with some hype but he mostly disappointed. In my early 2018 rookie mock draft, I had Scott as my 2.05; I had him ahead of other backs like Sony Michel and Ronald Jones who are definitely ahead of him now. A running back of his size should see more TDs because of his utility near the goal line. In 2016 Scott had just 6 TDs and he duplicated that output in 2017. That’s just not good enough. Scott did injure an ankle during the season but he was actually dressed and active for the Michigan game that he supposedly missed due to the injury. I didn’t believe this when I first read it while doing my research but Scott was arrested in October for his seventh charge for driving without a valid license. That is staggering. I don’t know Scott and don’t want to cast aspersions but how can you be so irresponsible? Either get your driver’s license right or stop driving. If Scott is convicted, which I doubt would happen but who knows, he could face jail time. Oh, I forgot to mention that despite being the primary ball carrier in each of his three years, Scott has failed to break 1,000 yards in a season. Between the poor production, a small injury concern and an alarming pattern of behavior, I am out on Scott if he does declare early. I would rather miss on him than draft him in my league and deal with dead cap if I have to cut him. On defense, Sparty’s heart and soul is sophomore LB Joe Bachie. He has 94 tackles, 7.5 tackles for loss, 2.5 sacks, 3 INTs, 2 forced fumbles and 1 fumble recovery on the season.

Cougar QB Luke Falk was my QB4 in early November when I did my early positional rankings for 2018 rookies. I will probably bump Falk down a bit (or more accurately, bump Lamar Jackson and Baker Mayfield up a bit) but that doesn’t mean I am down on him. Depending on his landing spot after the NFL Draft, I would consider drafting Falk late in my superflex leagues as a stash. Falk is a three year starter at Washington State and has incredible career stats: 1,403 completions, 14,481 passing yards, 119 passing TDs, 39 INTs and a 68.3% completion percentage. Falk’s stats did decrease a bit this year so that concerns me slightly but not enough to push him off my board. Falk’s best attributes are his experience, size and accuracy – those traits will definitely get him drafted to be a backup behind an aging vet. Washington State doesn’t bother running the ball too much (second worst rushing offense in the FBS at 71.1 yards per game) but that does not mean that RBs Jamal Morrow and James Williams are worthless. Both backs excel in the passing game with 898 combined receiving yards. The team’s leading receiver is junior Tavares Martin (70-831-9) but Falk spreads the love around because five guys have 50+ receptions. One other prospect to keep an eye on, not that you could miss him, is G Cody O’Connell. O’Connell’s nickname is “The Continent” and he deserves the title because he is listed at 6’9″ and 354lbs. It’s odd to see such a big guard and that could be telling that he’s not playing tackle. Per WalterFootball.com, one of my favorite draft resources, team sources think O’Connell will go undrafted. Reading that tempered my excitement but still how often do we get to see a 6’9″ player?

Maybe I’m blinded by my Big Ten fandom but I’m going with Sparty here. Michigan State has the better defense and is more likely to stop Washington State’s offense than vice versa. Prediction: Michigan State

Note: When watching film for a player in the offseason, I typically pick two games at random to watch. If game film is not available I will search for highlight reels, but keep in mind these are the best plays that player had all season so they really need to jump off the screen. I do not necessarily want to watch games where they did very well or very poorly as that may not be a great illustration of their true ability. If possible, when comparing players at the same position I also like to watch film against common opponents. Full disclosure, I am not watching film of every single game any player plays, instead I am looking for a representative sample. When researching college players I use a number of resources, I would recommend bookmarking the below sites…

Robert F. Cowper is a freelance writer who lives in New Jersey. Robert works as a recreation professional, specializing in youth sports, when he isn’t acting as commissioner for his many fantasy sports leagues.