I can see that you are a disruptor who is suffering from a bad case of self-imposed ignorance. . . . . . your fault, not mine.

You have proof of nothing. We have thousands of documented facts like 43 of 67 counties in Florida supposedly had 100% republican turnout. In addition to that they claim that just about every independent in the state voted for the world's most hated man. You have to be snorting some pretty strong stuff to believe that.

The next time the repugs may be in the receiving end. Let's see how honest you think it will be then.

"We have thousands of documented facts like 43 of 67 counties in Florida supposedly had 100% republican turnout. In addition to that they claim that just about every independent in the state voted for the world's most hated man."

What are you talking about? Please show me this because even I find that hard to believe. How come the liberal media hasn't ran with what you are saying? Anyway, I love your false statements and wannabe facts. I'm sure no independent group did these documents you speak of.

"We have thousands of documented facts like 43 of 67 counties in Florida supposedly had 100% republican turnout. In addition to that they claim that just about every independent in the state voted for the world's most hated man."

What are you talking about? Please show me this because even I find that hard to believe. How come the liberal media hasn't ran with what you are saying? Anyway, I love your false statements and wannabe facts. I'm sure no independent group did these documents you speak of.

Bush won so please MoveOn.org....

By Independent, I assume that you mean Republican. Have no fear. The figures are posted on the My Florida web site by appointed Republican bu$h butt kisser, Glenda Hood. Look it up yourself, since you are so smart.

A Corrupted ElectionDespite what you may have heard, the exit polls were rightRecall the Election Day exit polls that suggested John Kerry had won a convincing victory? The media readily dismissed those polls and little has been heard about them since.

Many Americans, however, were suspicious. Although President Bush prevailed by 3 million votes in the official, tallied vote count, exit polls had projected a margin of victory of 5 million votes for Kerry.

This unexplained 8 million vote discrepancy between the election night exit polls and the official count should raise a Chinese May Day of red flags.

The U.S. voting system is more vulnerable to manipulation than most Americans realize. Technologies such as electronic voting machines provide no confirmation that votes are counted as cast, and highly partisan election officials have the power to suppress votes and otherwise distort the count.

Exit polls are highly accurate. They remove most of the sources of potential polling error by identifying actual voters and asking them immediately afterward who they had voted for.

The reliability of exit polls is so generally accepted that the Bush administration helped pay for them during recent elections in Georgia, Belarus and Ukraine. Testifying before the House Committee on International Relations Dec. 7, John Tefft, deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, explained that the Bush administration funded exit polls because they were one of the "ways that would help to expose large-scale fraud." Tefft pointed to the discrepancy between exit polls and the official vote count to argue that the Nov. 22 Ukraine election was stolen.

[Is that some hypocrisy or what? All exit polls are highly accurate except the ones that say bu$h lost? ]

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1970/ The exit polls were based on more than 70,000 confidential questionnaires completed by randomly selected voters as they exited the polling place. The overall margin of error should have been under 1 percent. But the official result deviated from the poll projections by more than 5 percent—a statistical impossibility.

The Edison/Mitofsky report confirms there were large differences between their exit polls and the official results of the 2004 presidential election – much more so than in previous elections(p. 31). The national exit poll indicated a 3 point victory for Kerry; whereas the official election results indicated that he lost by 2.5%, a difference of 5.5%.

The Edison/Mitofsky report fails to substantiate their hypothesis that the difference between their exit polls and official election results should be explained by problems with the exit polls. They assert without supporting evidence that (p. 4), “Kerry voters were more likely to participate in the exit polls than Bush voters.” In fact, data included within the report suggest that the opposite might be true.

having NAALCP workers give drugs to the homeless so they will vote for the Dems or best yet, slash the tires of a van carrying people to the voting stations. Nah, Liberals are saints when it comes to this.

I am unfamiliar with any organization known as the NAALCP, Willie. Is that a new group formed recently in your tight, closed, bigoted, and misinformed little mind in order to give credence to your rantings and unsubstantiated accusations?

Prove what you've just posted in the quote above. Support it by citing sources and links.

You did do term papers in school, didn't you?

Catherine

_________________

"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime."Honore de Balzac

"Democrats work to help people who need help. That other party, they work for people who don't need help. That's all there is to it."~Harry S. Truman

having NAALCP workers give drugs to the homeless so they will vote for the Dems or best yet, slash the tires of a van carrying people to the voting stations. Nah, Liberals are saints when it comes to this.

I am unfamiliar with any organization known as the NAALCP, Willie. Is that a new group formed recently in your tight, closed, bigoted, and misinformed little mind in order to give credence to your rantings and unsubstantiated accusations?

Prove what you've just posted in the quote above. Support it by citing sources and links.

You did do term papers in school, didn't you?

Willie marched in and made his announcements, proclaiming them to be holy writs of some kind and we were supposed to roll over and accept his twisted excuses as facts.

I'm sure that Wille knows about as much about the "NAALCP" as he does about honest elections........... not much!

But I'm willing to bet that he knows about george bu$h's Kompassionate Konservative Khristians!

having NAALCP workers give drugs to the homeless so they will vote for the Dems or best yet, slash the tires of a van carrying people to the voting stations. Nah, Liberals are saints when it comes to this.

I am unfamiliar with any organization known as the NAALCP, Willie. Is that a new group formed recently in your tight, closed, bigoted, and misinformed little mind in order to give credence to your rantings and unsubstantiated accusations? :roll:

Prove what you've just posted in the quote above. Support it by citing sources and links.

AH........... Willie tried to do a funny and with Newsmax non the less.

Isn't that the outfit that is second only to Free Republic for it's hate mongering? Frequented by the confused Ann/Dan Coulter and escorted by the equally gay Matt Drudge who hang out at gay bars in DC?

Of course Willie sees absolutely nothing wrong with a gay guy who spews the Kompassionate Konservative Khristianity of king george!

This article should tickle old Willie's fancy........ of course it won't be acceptable because it's not Faux Spews or Free 'Willie' (hehehe) but never the less gets the point across in short order.

The most oxymoronic phrase in the English language has got to be: Christian Conservative.

One of my favorite pieces of Bush-bashing propaganda illustrates my point with comic elegance. The piece is a mock ad entitled, “The Bush Campaign’s TV Commercial If He Was Running Against Jesus. ” There are six panels, four of which contain a compassionate quote from Jesus, and then the Bush campaign’s twisted twist on the quote. For example, one panel says, “ Jesus of Nazareth says, “ Do not resist one who is evil. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other, ” and the Bush campaign spin is, “Can we trust Jesus to fight the War on Terror? ” The ad sums up what the Bush campaign considers Jesus’ inability to govern by saying, “ Jesus - Wrong on social services. Wrong on crime. Wrong on defense. Wrong for America. ”

This ad not only wonderfully encapsulates everything that is wrong with Bush’s approach to, well, everything, but it also sharply targets the neanderthal neo-conservative hypocrisy regarding Christianity.

Now, I renounced Christianity a while ago, when it became clear to me that the teachers and administration at my private Baptist high school - and, by extension, many who called themselves Christian - were shameful shams.....

Memo to pious pretenders: Jesus would love trailer park trash and project-dwellers. Indeed, he would have inhabited a cozy double-wide rather than a sterile McMansion, and would have mingled with the modest masses over the fur-wearing flaunters. Indeed, Jesus would have been on welfare, as he would have been out of work. After all, no corporation in America has a position open for Selfless Saint...........................

A true Christian, you see, is pro-poor and anti-war. A true Christian is peace-loving and community-oriented. A true Christian is not a gay-bashing, homeless-hating, war-mongering bigot. In other words, a true Christian is LIBERAL - that is, RATIONAL and HUMANE - and not CONSERVATIVE - in other words, MENTALLY CONFUSED AND CRUEL TO THE CORE. ....................

Just What Exactly Would Jesus Do? Jesus would denouce all those who exploit his image in the name of arrogance, belligerence and greed. Yet he would do so without malice.

If only we could all be so restrained in our outrage toward the Tyrannical Theocrats mis-leading our country.