Thursday, 27 June 2013

In 2001 the BBC accused Nick Griffin of racism for denouncing that Asian gangs were raping boys and girls in the United Kingdom. Twelve-years later we are still learning about the actions of Asian gangs raping boys and girls.

Learning about what went on inside BBC headquarters for many years and the fact that the BBC protected rapists and paedophiles operating inside the BBC, it does not come as a surprise that the BBC chose to ignore Nick Griffin and even threatened him.

The Daily Telegraph reports that there is now an epidemic of 'sheds with beds' created by flood immigration. Oh, Flood Immigration is such a delightful things and so much benefits the United Kingdom's economy! Is it? How much do illegal settlements contribute to the British economy? The article also talks about neighbours who are up in arms because of the situations such 'sheds with beds' are creating.

Keep voting for other political parties other than the British National Party and soon the United Kingdom will be plagued by sheds with beds, the British version of Brazilian Favelas. Anybody who knows about Favelas knows the social costs in terms of crime including drug trafficking, alcoholism, prostitution, robberies and murder.

Ah, by the way, having a Favela near your property will do wonders for your community and the value of your property. You might be pleasantly surprise when you try to put your property in the housing market.

Bit by bit, the Conservative Party is adopting British National Party policies. Forced by a tidal wave of public discontent, the Chancellor George Osborne (Jeffrey Osborne according to President Barak Obama), stood up in the House of Commons to deliver the message: Learn English or forget about Welfare Payments.

The mainstream political parties are being dragged along the way by the British National Party, kicking and screaming. Of course Conservative Party representatives are still acting against Nationalists – working bans against political opponents and entry bans against Americans that share the feelings of the vast majority of the British people about the threat posed by Islamic extremists. But I reckon the so called bans, including libel and defamation against political organisations including the EDL that has now been categorized as Far Right while UKIP is categorized as Far Right and Racist, are issued merely in despair.

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer were denied the rights awarded to the killers of Drummer Lee Rigby and many other hate preachers who have been subsidized by the Welfare State.

Ms Geller said: “In a striking blow against freedom, the British government has banned us from entering the country. In not allowing us into the country solely because of our true and accurate statements about Islam, the British government is behaving like a de facto Islamic state. The nation that gave the world the Magna Carta is dead.”

Mr Spencer echoed her comments, and added: “This decision is a victory for the campaign of smears and defamation that has been waged against us in the UK since we announced we were going. In reality, our work is dedicated to the defense of the freedom of speech and equality of rights for all. If that is too hot for the U.K. now, then Britain faces a grim future.”

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

Francisco Franco was a Christian Monarchist and for some to classify Francisco Franco as National Socialist is the biggest display of ignorance ever. Francisco Franco fought to stop Spain from becoming a Socialist regime and he was very much supported by the Catholic Church.

In spite of the fact that Hitler used Spain to train Luftwaffe pilots – there is a painting called Guernica created by Pablo Picasso depicting mass bombing operations against civilian populations – General Francisco Franco did not join the Axe and kept Spain well away from the delusions of Nazi Germany.

Please find below a letter that I hope you will be able to publish in full in the next edition of your publication.

Regards,

Michael Jones

Rather than rebutting the smear article recently aimed at our party (published on 19-06-13), as the local British National Party organiser I would like to respond by raising some serious points, for a change.

We believe that the British people have a right to hear the truth on any particular issue however uncomfortable the truth may be in this politically correct climate.

This is why we recently planned a peaceful march from Woolwich barracks to Lewisham Islamic Centre, where adult Muslims are being trained in Wing Chun, a form of Kung Fu which includes fighting with weapons including knives and hatchets very similar to those used in the ritual slaughter of Lee Rigby. It is said one of the alleged attackers of Lee Rigby attended this Islamic Centre.

As a legitimate political party we campaign on many differentissues, but do not organise street marches, however we believe this problem needs highlighting and dealing with, so were prepared to do a one off march on this occasion.

The march was banned by the metropolitan police.

Many people have asked me the very important question as to why such an event was banned.

Is it because the government have no solutions to the growingproblem of WahhabiIslam on our streets, a problem that successive Tory, Labour and now Tory/Lib Dem governments have created with their failed immigration policies?

Dear Editor,After reading the article by Mark Chandler regarding the British National Party and the EDL, (link provided below) I would be grateful if you would give us an opportunity to reply to the dreams of Matthew Collins. In a fair and decent democracy, surely this wouldn't be an issue for you to print an unedited short piece from us in both your hard copy and online.http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/10480128.Woolwich_attack_march__shows_BNP_are_finished/

I look forward to your response.

Kind regards,Michael JonesBexley branch & south London sub regional organiserBritish National Party

Monday, 24 June 2013

Extrapolating
realities in Greece, in Hungary and in France with realities in Britain in an
attempt to justify Nationalist political and electoral strategies in Britain is
extremely childish and naïve. There is no ‘Et ceteris paribus’ kind of
analysis. We can only compare like with like. There are fundamental historical,
political, social and cultural differences. In political terms nothing is the
same and nothing remains the same for too long.

Some British Nationalists are making completely erroneous
assumptions by pretending that the political evolution of Greece, Hungary,
France and Britain are one and the same, when the said political evolution in
each of the above named countries has been dramatically different.
Unfortunately, in desperation, some Nationalists believe in fallacies. They
believe that same political strategies can apply to different political
realities and in so doing they fool themselves and condemn themselves to
eternal frustration.

Some time
ago, Paul Hickman, British National Party Birmingham Organiser, wrote me a
message and said that activists that had come all the way from the northern
England to take part in a memorial rally in Central London to honour the memory
of Lee Rigby were not happy with some words that I used in a speech during the
said rally.

Looking at
what Paul Hickman and the said activists face in Birmingham of all places it is
plain easy to understand certain angry attitudes given the sensitivities of the
issues we have to deal with, especially taking into account that most of those
involved in acts of terrorism in the UK and abroad come actually from
Birmingham and the fact that most of those involved in raping boys and girls
also come from places like Birmingham, in spite of the fact that many other
British cities are affected.

Irate
reactions and strong words have come to be expected from people that are
absolutely fed up with the realities they have to confront on a daily basis. I have been in British Nationalism long enough
to understand the anger and the frustrations that many Nationalists experience
and for this very reason I decided a long time ago that rather than attacking
fellow Nationalists that feel understandably angry and frustrated I would
use a constructive approach.

Paul
Hickman is a very strong character. Well, you have to be strong to survive in
places like Birmingham.What we have to
face in Southern England is still relatively mild compared to what Paul Hickman
and other activist have to cope with.

Saturday, 22 June 2013

Gigantic Crime: Edward Snowden is accused of saying that American spies spy
American agents can steal, torture, kill, traffic drugs, et cetera, et cetera, and American agents are not arrested nor persecuted. A civilian makes a statement saying that the American Government is spying on ordinary people and suddenly all hell breaks loose. Are those in charge of American security agencies mentally retarded? Are the political officers who oversee the actions of American agents deranged?
If anything, the American authorities can create a scandal out of nothing. So, a contractor says that the Government is spying on ordinary citizens. We have known about it for ages. No need to issue threats, no need to go on the offensive. By trying to kill a fly with a cannon ball the American authorities have covered themselves in mud that merely confirms that they are up to no good.

Thursday, 20 June 2013

When I hear Prime Minister David Cameron talking about bypassing Parliament when deciding to go to war, I do remember a man of the Labour Party called Robin Cook who stood up for Parliament against the expediency of Prime Minister Tony Blair who I believe, and this it my humble opinion, should be put on trial as a War Criminal.

When Tony Blair was rushing towards the illegal invasion of Iraq, Robin Cook put his conscience first and gave up his post as Foreign Secretary in the Labour Cabinet and that was the end of his political career.

Claire Short and many others did not have the guts to stand up and be counted.

Robin Cook will be forever in my memory as a man who rose to the occasion and passed the test with flying colours.
In January 2007, a headstone was erected in The Grange, Edinburgh Cemetery, where Cook is buried, bearing the epitaph: "I may not have succeeded in halting the war, but I did secure the right of parliament to decide on war.

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Do
you know this chap? His name is Mark Elliot Zuckerberg. He is an American
computer programmer and Internet entrepreneur born in New York in 1984. In 2004, this amazing Jewish guy together with Harvard classmates launched Facebook. Thanks to people like him we can express our views and reach many people that otherwise we could not reach. Anti-Semitism is nothing more than ignorance and sheer stupidity.

Aisha Duhulowa was a 13-year-old girl who was gang raped and then sentenced to be stoned to death by a Sharia Court that accused her of fornication.

According to Amnesty International, nurses were sent to check whether she was still alive. When they found that the girl was still alive, the girl was put back in a hole so that the stoning could continue.

Saturday, 15 June 2013

Very often
we hear people saying people who vote for the British National Party are this
or people who vote for the British National Party are that and in then end such
statements are nothing more than stereotypes and over-generalization.

We also need
to take stock of those amongst us that are very much prone to stereotypes and
over-generalization to the point of sounding not just silly but absolutely
irrational.

If
stereotypes and over generalization were the rule, not many people would vote
for any political party. They support political parties because of economic
policies, because of principles linked to ethics. Therefore, extreme views or
irrational arguments are not the key for success.

The British
National Party was born in 1982 – this means roughly over 40 years of existence
– and has struggled with stereotypes and as long as we keep struggling with
stereotypes there is not going to be any major political success.

I have a
habit of listening to everybody and listening to everybody I have a clear idea
of why certain political parties are successful and other political parties do
not succeed. We are battling against stereotypes but we need to accept the fact
that some amongst us behave in a way that justifies the existence of negative
stereotypes.

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Victor Meldrew’s line would be most appropriate - “I cannot
believe it”- Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, said that Ed Miliband’s
team is not authentic. Speaking on BBC Radio 4, Mr Danczuk said that “Labour
needs people like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson who are able to communicate
with voters.”

“In time gone by we
have had people like David Blunkett, people like Alan Johnson, people like Alan
Milburn, John Reid would be another example, John Prescott would be another
example,” Mr Danczuk stated on BBC Radio 4’s The World at One programme.

There is a
fundamental and powerful reason to keep Nationalism away from Universities and
in particular away from students.In the
very same manner that Marxism infiltrated Universities, Nationalism could be
sown in Tertiary Education that prepares members of the ruling elites.

This is why
and all we hear about freedom and extremism is just a propaganda lie to stop
Nationalism from rising to power and implementing policies that could bring
back prosperity by getting rid of the system that firstly creates chaos and
ultimately leads to a constant flow of social conflict and wars.

Sunday, 9 June 2013

I do believe that rather than walking away from certain
issues we must confront them head on and have clear stances on every one of
them. We are plagued by our own inconsistencies and lack of clarity. Official
statements must clearly indicate what we stand for and our behaviour and
attitudes must be at all times consistent with official statements.

In order to widen their appeal and attract more support,
many nationalists have committed a mortal sin: they have failed to come to
terms with their own views and their own attitudes. Rather than publicly
stating what they truly believe they have hidden their beliefs acting very much
like the political correct society that they constantly criticize.

Unfortunately, such strategy has been totally
counter-productive and many decades after the formation of nationalist
organisations, the said organisations have practically no role in British
politics other than acting as marginal organisations and being used as
scapegoats that are constantly demonised by other political organisations,
social organisations and the mass media.

There are about 650 seats in the House of Commons and more
than 20,000 council seats across the country and so called nationalist
organisations have no representatives in the House of Commons and have no
control of any local or regional authority. When we get second place in any
election, the feat is celebrated as brilliant success but in fact it is no more
than the confirmation that we have no power whatsoever because in order to
implement any policies you must not only be represented. You must have a
considerable number of seats to actually be able to deliver what we promise.

Friday, 7 June 2013

As Press Officer, I stated from the very beginning that I
was going to put the facts on the table for everybody to see and the title of
an article couldn’t be more explicit about the nature of those the politically
correct elites classify as ‘enrichment’.

The stated that they hope to spark a war on the streets of
Britain, that killing a group of people who oppose their acts of madness was
not enough, that they wanted to commit mass murder by turning the country into
mass graves.

They were armed with nail bombs, shotguns,
swords and knives and one needs to ask the question if many like them are being
trained in ‘Islamic Cultural Centres’ across the United Kingdom and subsidized
with taxpayers’ money.

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Under a Labour government, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith presented in the House of Commons some of the most draconian limitations of civil rights this country has ever known publicly known as Anti-Terror Legislation.

Anti-Terror Legislation including in fact the abolition of Habeas Corpus (the right to be told why you are arrested), of the right to have access to a Defence Attorney as soon as you are arrested and of the right your relatives and friends have to know that you have been arrested and to know where you are. Detention without trial for long periods of time was legitimised and the presumption of innocence was completely ignored.

Such attack on our civil rights was justified by the then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith and others because they said that such measures were needed to protect us from terrorist attacks and the legislation is being used by local authorities to spy on ordinary citizens for purposes that bear no relationship to terrorism.

What a paradox! Our civil rights were eroded to protect us from terrorist attacks and terrorists are free to go around preaching terrorism and violence.

Sunday, 2 June 2013

In 1980 due to discrepancies involving the way the National Front used to operate getting regulary involved in street confrontations, John Tyndall founded the New National Front and made a serious attempt to distance himself from what had been characterized as Neo-Nazism. It was an attempt to force a rethink within the National Front and on his magazine Spearhead, John Tyndall indicated that he hoped that the schism would be only temporary.

However, electoral disaster dictated political reality and in 1982 the New National Front became the British National Party with more moderate views that led John Tyndall to say in 1983 after the General Election that the party’s more moderate image had been sufficiently attractive to invite 3,000 enquiries from those willing to joining a political party that at the start had only 2,500 members. This moderate approach also led to policy changes and regarding immigration the party went from ‘mandatory repatriation’ to ‘voluntary repatriation’.

However, John Tyndall’s and in particular references to images depicting Nazi symbols haunted him for the remaining of his political career and by the end of 1998, the political party that had started with 2,500 members in 1982 had only 1,000 members. This led to a leadership election in which Tyndall had only 30% support and following which Nick Griffin became British National Party Leader. In his heyday, John Tyndall managed to obtain 35,832 votes in 1997 that were pale by comparison to the 563,743 votes obtained by Nick Griffin in 2010. In 2010, the party lost seats but saw support at national level grow from 192,746 votes in 2005 to 563,743 in 2010 and a record number of electoral deposits were saved.

A more moderate British National Party has had its political agenda imitated by other political parties like the United Kingdom Independence Party and forced other political parties to at least mention the issues presented by the British National Party in a much wider political debate.

Undoubtedly, the views across the party vary in terms of the strength of feelings regarding several issues but the main objectives are shared across the entire organisation across the country. The British political scene has been evolving. Membership of so called mainstream political parties like the Conservative Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party has been falling steadily and only last year, across Britain, more than 60 per cent of those entitled to vote did not vote in spite of all kinds of schemes including Postal Ballots that were designed to entice people to vote.

Undoubtedly, the origins of the British National Party and the constant campaign carried out by the mass media, political parties and parapolitical organisations to demonise the British National Party and its members has had an impact in terms of electoral results but, despite demonization, the British National Party has been proven right every step of the way forecasting developments that are now a reality.

Damian Thompson’s article on the Daily Telegraph is certainly a masterpiece and the title is a journalistic gem: “There’s a problem with Islam, says Tony Blair. He should know. He helped create it.”

Damian Thompson comment that Tony Blair’s statement is as if Neville Chamberlain had revealed in 1940 that there was a problem with some of these German nationalists and had asked what was Mr Churchill going to do about it.

Some of the achievements of Tony Blair included promoting extremism by subsidizing some of the very Islamists whose influence needed to be contained.

Damian Thompson writes ‘for many years there has been a spectrum of Muslim belief in this country ranging from unobtrusive Islamic observance to terrorist totalitarianism.’

We know the amount of ink used to depict images of an impending catastrophe for the Conservative Party and the sudden rise to power of the UK Independence Party. The announcement of the death of the Conservative Party, like the announcement of the death of Mark Twain, might be highly premature.

There are about 650 seats in the House of Commons and there are about 433 principal authorities in the United Kingdom as a whole. How many of the said seats in the House of Commons and of the principal authorities would UKIP have to win in order to have a realistic chance of implementing its political programme?

We must ask the same question when we talk about the British National Party because this is a question that affects any political organisation wishing to enter 10 Downing Street and have a meaningful majority in the House of Commons to be able to implement policies.

If anybody actually believes that a small political organisation will be capable of dictating the terms of engagement in British politics the said person must be deluding himself or herself. Purely and simply, it cannot be done.