The sculpture was quickly righted, then almost immediately set upon again. Just 90 minutes after being re-erected, the Alamo Square sculpture was again toppled, causing officials to just give the fuck up and truck the thing away.

Victory for the resistance!

Sponsored

So why is San Francisco so dead-set against the existence of these things? (I mean, other than the obvious fact that they are ugly-ass advertisements for the NFL, paid for by taxpayer dollars, hyping a game that won’t even take place in the city.)

This post does a good job of breaking down many of the factors in play, but the biggest one is that San Francisco is paying to host the festivities ahead of the Super Bowl, even though the game will be played in Santa Clara. The cost to San Francisco is at $5 million and rising, and it’s all coming out of the general fund. Meanwhile, all of Santa Clara’s costs will be reimbursed by the Host Committee, with money from the NFL and private interests.

More than that, the sculpture vandalism is a natural outcome when the NFL’s insistence on being the biggest thing in town comes to a city like San Francisco—with a deeply ingrained mischievous streak, and the confidence to know it doesn’t need a damned football game to have civic pride.

Advertisement

So the war continues. There’s a week left, and nine of the Super Bowl 50 sculptures remain standing. They won’t go down without a fight: