have worked for a specific period of time at one of the SEC Work Sites

Claims compensated under the SEC do not have to go through the dose reconstruction process, as is required for other cancer claims covered by The Act.

The Act also allows for additional groups of employees (called classes of employees) to be added to the SEC. Classes of employees and work sites can be considered for addition to the SEC through a petition process run by NIOSH.

To answer questions about the SEC, NIOSH has developed a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) below. Links to other program FAQs are located on the “Find It!” navigation box under “On this page . . . ”

Select the topic you are interested in below by clicking its link. You will be taken to the section of this page that lists FAQs about the topic. Links throughout the FAQs will guide you to further information.

SEC General Information

The SEC is a uniquely defined category of employees established under The Act (42 CFR Part 83). The SEC is comprised of classes of employees who have any of 22 “specified cancers,” who worked for a specified period of time at one of the SEC Work Sites or participated in certain nuclear weapons tests, and who meet other additional requirements under The Act. An individual member (or the eligible survivors of a member) of a class of employees included in the SEC is entitled to compensation without having to undergo a dose reconstruction performed for his or her case by NIOSH, or to have a decision by the Department of Labor (DOL) as to whether the cancer was “at least as likely as not” caused by occupational exposure to radiation, as is required for other cancer claims covered by The Act.

A class of employees is defined in the regulation as a group of employees who work or worked at the same Department of Energy (DOE) facility or Atomics Weapon Employer (AWE) facility, and for whom the availability of information and recorded data on radiation exposures is comparable with respect to the informational needs of dose reconstructions under the dose reconstruction regulation.

Neither NIOSH nor the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health developed the list of 22 “specified cancers,” and neither can modify the list. The list is part of the EEOICPA statute, and only Congress can modify the list of “specified cancers.” The origin for the list of “specified cancers” began in the Radiation-Exposed Veterans Compensation Act (REVCA) of 1988. The Radiation-Exposed Veterans Compensation Act’s original list included 13 cancers that were based on published reports from National Research Council Committees that identified elevated risks of contracting these cancers after exposure to radiation. This list of 13 cancers was then incorporated into the original enactment of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act in 1990. In 2000, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act was amended to incorporate a variety of changes, including the addition of 6 more specified cancers. The list of “specified cancers” for inclusion in the SEC is comprised of 22 cancers: 19 cancers specified in RECA; renal and bone cancers as specified in EEOICPA; and male and female breast cancers, which are considered separately under EEOICPA.

The following table shows a comparison of the “specified cancers” under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, the Radiation-Exposed Veterans Compensation Act, and EEOICPA.

Comparison of “Specified Cancer” Lists1

Cancer site

REVCA and RECA (1990)

RECA (2000)2

EEOICPA

Bile duct

X

X

X

Bone

X

Brain

X

X

Breast (female and male)

X

X

X

Colon

X

X

Esophagus

X

X

X

Gall bladder

X

X

X

Kidney

X

Leukemia (exc. CLL)

X

X

X

Liver

X

X

X

Lung

X

X

Lymphoma (NHL)

X

X

X

Multiple myeloma

X

X

X

Ovary

X

X

Pancreas

X

X

X

Pharynx

X

X

X

Salivary gland

X

X

Small intestine

X

X

X

Stomach

X

X

X

Thyroid

X

X

X

Urinary bladder

X

X

1This table is provided for comparison purposes only and does not include other requirements that might apply, such as latency period and primary and tumor status (i.e., primary or secondary).

2This list is specifically for those cancers covered by RECA under open- air nuclear testing.

Aggregated days of employment are the total number of days that a worker was employed in a class at multiple covered SEC facilities. The total number of days of employment in a class at each facility can be combined together to meet the 250 day requirement.

Under The Act, DOL was designated the responsibility of determining the eligibility of energy employees with covered occupational illnesses and their survivors and managing claims for compensation and benefits.

The SEC rule does provide for an alternative to the 250 work days employment requirement whenever classes of employees may have been exposed to radiation during discrete incidents likely to have involved exceptionally high-level exposures, including any such incidents that may have occurred during projects of short duration. In this case, mere presence during the incident would substitute for the 250 work days employment requirement. It is important to note that in order to qualify an incident would have to be both high enough to be similar to a criticality and be one where NIOSH did not have the information needed to reconstruct dose with sufficient accuracy. Clean-up operations of highly radioactive materials would need to be evaluated based on the specific circumstances, such as the amount and type of exposures and the data that are available.

Yes, the SEC petition process is intended to be complete, independent, and open to all interested individuals. NIOSH makes every effort to ensure that SEC petitioners and members of the public are kept informed about, and included in, the process.

Detailed information is provided on our website for petitions that meet the minimum qualification for review and evaluation. Petition information is posted on the work site page to which the petition applies, the Advisory Board page, and the Special Exposure Cohort page, such as:

Yes, NIOSH is aware that the SEC process can sometimes seem complex. Joshua Kinman, NIOSH SEC Petition Counselor, works with petitioners in overcoming any frustrations or confusion that they may feel when submitting an SEC petition. In addition, Denise Brock was appointed as a Consultant/Ombudsman to NIOSH under The Act. She helps individuals with a variety of issues that involve the SEC petition process and the dose reconstruction process.

How the SEC Petition Counselor Helps Claimants:

SEC Petitions

Mr. Kinman provides advice to those who wish to submit an SEC petition. Some of the things he assists the petitioner(s) in understanding include:

What information does an individual need to submit in SEC petition

How to submit an SEC petition

What happens to the petition once it is received by NIOSH

If the petition qualifies for further evaluation, what that means

If the petition does not qualify for further evaluation, what the petitioner can do

What happens when the petition is presented to the Advisory Board

What happens to the petition after the Advisory Board has talked about the petition

Denise Brock also was appointed as a Consultant/Ombudsman to NIOSH under The Act to help individuals with a variety of issues that involve the SEC petition process and the dose reconstruction process. In her work as the Ombudsman to NIOSH, Ms. Brock has built a strong working relationship with the Department of Labor’s Ombudsman’s Office, District Offices, and National Office in an effort to help the claimant community.

Ms. Brock has been an outspoken and effective advocate for workers for many years. She is the daughter of former uranium workers from the Mallinckrodt Chemical Plant in St. Louis, Missouri. She was the Founder/Director of The United Nuclear Weapons Workers advocacy group. Ms. Brock has extensive experience and expertise in preparing and filing SEC petitions for classes of workers. In fact, the SEC petition Ms. Brock filed on behalf of workers at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Plant led to the first class of workers being added to the SEC. Ms. Brock was a strong force in organizing former workers and providing necessary information to the Advisory Board to push forward the SEC petition.

Ms. Brock has acted as not only a worker advocate but as a consultant to several law firms which helped The Act claimants. She has been recognized for her experience and was asked to testify before the Judiciary Committee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims, U.S. House of Representatives, Hearing on Implementation of The Act in an effort to bring forward ideas to help change the program to better serve the needs of the Workers.

How the Ombudsman to NIOSH under The Act Helps Claimants:

SEC Petitions
Ms. Brock directly helps petitioners in gathering the materials, information, and documentation needed to file an SEC petition. She also helps petitioners in preparing and presenting comments to the Advisory Board. Ms. Brock also helps petitioners who may be having problems with their current petition.

Dose Reconstruction
In some cases when a claimant has problems with the dose reconstruction process, NIOSH will ask Ms. Brock to help the claimant. Claimants also contact her for help in reviewing their case, even if previously denied. Ms. Brock will review the entire case file, including the Department of Labor initial case file, the NIOSH dose reconstruction report, and the medical records. Ms. Brock has built a strong working relationship with the Department of Labor’s Ombudsman’s Office, District Offices, and National Office in an effort to help the claimant community.

Outreach Meetings
Ms. Brock conducts outreach meetings and workshops for claimants, advocates, consultants, and the public in order to promote a better understanding of The Act and the claims process.

The evaluation of a qualified petition includes in-depth research on the available monitoring records and worker data to determine if NIOSH has the information needed to reconstruct radiation doses with sufficient accuracy and if it does not, whether the radiation doses may have endangered the health of the class of workers defined in the petition. In this process, we may uncover new information that confirms, refutes, or supplements the information in the petition and the existing information in NIOSH’s database.

This new information may impact the SEC petition, and/or a related Site Profile or Technical Basis Document. With NIOSH’s commitment and the requirement in the dose reconstruction rule to apply the best available science in dose reconstructions, when relevant information becomes available, we will revise technical documents and evaluate whether that new information will impact the compensability of a completed dose reconstruction with a probability of causation less than 50%.

A Program Evaluation Report (PER), details the effect, if any, of the new information on completed dose reconstructions. If it appears that the new information may result in an increase in dose for a completed dose reconstruction with a probability of causation of less than 50%, we are committed to working with DOL to reopen and rework the dose reconstruction, as appropriate.

NIOSH’s evaluation of an SEC petition is not dependent on the status of a Site Profile or Technical Basis Document. Site Profiles provide tools and guidance for continuity in dose reconstructions for a facility; however, NIOSH does not necessarily require a Site Profile or Technical Basis Document to perform a dose reconstruction. The evaluation of a petition by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health may be conducted at the same time as the Advisory Board’s review of a Site Profile or Technical Basis Document. The information the Advisory Board decides to consider in its evaluation of an SEC petition is determined by the Advisory Board.

SEC Final Rule for the Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the SEC

How HHS will determine whether or not it is feasible to estimate the radiation dose that the class received and if there is a reasonable likelihood that the radiation dose may have endangered the health of members of the class

The procedures that are necessary to add a class of employees to the SEC

Individuals and organizations that are qualified to submit an SEC petition on behalf of a class

Minimum requirements that must be met for an SEC petition to qualify for consideration

Procedures to involve and notify petitioners in the petition process and to allow petitioners to seek administrative reviews of proposed decisions

Make the final recommended decision as to whether to add or deny adding a class to the SEC after considering recommendations provided by NIOSH, the Board, and from the HHS administrative review, if applicable

Develop and send a report of the final recommended decision to the petitioners, including a description of the relevant criteria and a summary of the information and findings that the decision is based upon

Provide Congress with a report giving the final recommended decision, the definition of the class of employees covered by the decision, and the criteria and findings upon which the decision was based for classes to be added to the SEC

Congress reviews the Secretary of HHS’ final decision. Congress can reverse or expedite the decision to add a class to the SEC. If Congress takes no action that effects the decision, it will take effect 30 calendar days after Congress receives the Secretary’s final decision.

DOL’s role is to determine the eligibility of claims to be paid under the SEC. DOL will determine if the energy employee worked during the defined period established by the class, meets the 250 days of employment requirement, and has one of the 22 “specified cancers” or an eligible secondary cancer.

SEC Petition Requirements

If NIOSH determined that the dose reconstruction cannot be completed, then the petition must provide:

Identifying and contact information; and

The justification that the dose reconstruction cannot be completed due to insufficient records and information, as indicated in the written notification from NIOSH.

All other petitioners must provide:

Identifying and contact information; and

A proposed class definition; and

A description of why the proposed class should be added to the SEC (e.g., records and information available are inadequate to estimate the radiation doses acquired by members of the proposed class of employees with sufficient accuracy; identification of any exposure incident that was unmonitored, unrecorded, or inadequately monitored or recorded if the petition is based on an exposure incident, etc.).

Please Note: Petitioners may be required to provide evidence that the incident occurred if NIOSH is unable to obtain records or confirmation of the incident form sources independent of the petitioners. This evidence is not required at the time the petition is submitted. The petitioners will be directly informed of the need for the supplemental information.

Documentation or worker statements provided by affidavit that indicate the radiation exposures and doses of the members were not monitored, either through personal or area monitoring;

Documentation or worker statements provided by affidavit that indicate that radiation monitoring records for members have been lost, falsified, or destroyed.

A report from a Health Physicist or other individual with expertise in dose reconstruction that documents the limitations of existing DOE/AWE records on radiation exposure at the facility; or

A scientific or technical report published or issues by a government agency of the Executive Branch of Government, the Government Accounting Office, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, or published in a peer-reviewed journal that identifies dosimetry and related information that are unavailable due to either a lack of monitoring or the destruction or loss of records for estimating radiation doses of employees covered by the petition.

If relevant, inclusion of information indicating an exposure incident that was unmonitored, unrecorded, or inadequately monitored or recorded.

Please Note: Petitioners may be required to provide evidence that the incident occurred if NIOSH is unable to obtain records or confirmation of the incident from sources independent of the petitioners. This evidence is not required at the time the petition is submitted. The petitioners will be directly informed of the need for the supplemental information.

Petitioners may be required to provide evidence that the incident occurred if NIOSH is unable to obtain records or confirmation of the incident from sources independent of the petitioner’s source. This evidence is not required at the time the petition is submitted. The petitioners will be directly informed of the need for the supplemental information.

Medical evidence that one or more members of the class may have been exposed to high dose of radiation from the incident

If the above is not available, then

Notarized affidavits from one or more employees who witnessed the incident may qualify

Please Note: The affidavits alone, however, may not be sufficient to confirm the occurrence of an incident. As with all evidence provided, NIOSH will consider the adequacy and credibility of the evidence provided in the affidavits.

Notarized affidavits from one or more individuals who did not witness the incident may be substituted if the individual was directly informed by one or more employees who witnessed the incident. The affidavits alone, however, may not be sufficient to confirm the occurrence of an incident. As with all evidence provided, NIOSH will consider the adequacy and credibility of the evidence provided in the affidavits.

SEC Petition Process

General Questions

The petition then goes through a qualification stage to ensure that the petition meets all of the minimum requirements for review and evaluation.

Once the petition meets the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, NIOSH publishes a notice in the Federal Register to notify the public of its decision to evaluate the petition.

NIOSH evaluates the petition and writes a report detailing the findings.

NIOSH sends the report to the Advisory Board and to the petitioner(s).

NIOSH presents the evaluation of the petition to the Advisory Board in a public meeting where petitioners and other interested parties can attend. During the meeting, petitioner(s) have the opportunity to speak to the Board.

The Advisory Board provides a recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The Secretary of HHS reviews all of the information and makes a final decision.

The Secretary of HHS submits the final decision to Congress.

Congress reviews the Secretary of HHS’ final decision. Congress can reverse or expedite the decision to add a class to the SEC. If Congress takes no action that effects the decision, it will take effect 30 calendar days after Congress receives the Secretary’s final decision.

The Secretary of HHS sends DOL a report providing the final decision on the petition after the Congressional review period.

NIOSH provides guidance to SEC petitioners throughout the petition process. Both an Ombudsman to NIOSH and an SEC Petition Counselor are available to help petitioners understand the requirements and information needed to file an SEC petition. They will discuss the petition with the petitioner, clarify the information submitted, and discuss deficiencies in the petition, if any. Additional information on the Ombudsman to NIOSH and the SEC Petition Counselor can be found on the Special Exposure Cohort page of our website.

If you have questions regarding the SEC petition process, Joshua Kinman, NIOSH SEC Petition Counselor, can be contacted via email at jkinman@cdc.gov or by calling 513-533-6831. Information on filing an SEC petition can also be found on our How to Submit an SEC Petition web page.

Petition is Denied (does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation)

If an SEC petition does not meet the minimum requirements set forth in the SEC petition procedures, NIOSH may determine that the petition does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation and may deny the SEC petition.

If the SEC petition does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, NIOSH will notify petitioners of any requirements that the petition failed to meet and provide guidance to the petitioners in developing the relevant information.

Petitioners have 30 calendar days from the date of notification to revise the petition. If, after 30 days, the petition remains unqualified, NIOSH will issue a decision that the petition does not qualify for evaluation. Petitioners then have 30 calendar days to request a review of that decision. If a review has been requested, NIOSH will make the final decision as to whether to accept or deny the petition based on results of the review. If at the end of the 30 calendar days the petition does not meet the minimum requirements or is not reviewed, NIOSH’s proposed finding will become a final decision.

After the 30 calendar days from the date of the initial notification, NIOSH will let the petitioners know that the petition still does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation. The petitioners will have 30 calendar days to request a review of that decision.

If after 61 days from the original notification, the petition still does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, and a review has not been requested, NIOSH will inform the petitioners of the decision to deny the petition and provide the basis for the finding.

Yes, if the petition is denied because it does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, the petitioner can request a review of that decision. The petitioners have 30 calendar days after notification that the petition remains unqualified to request the review, in writing, and must specify why the finding should be reversed.

The request may not include any new information or documentation that was not included in the original completed petition. If petitioners obtain new information within the allotted 30 day period, petitioners should provide the new information to NIOSH. NIOSH will consider this new information as a revision to the petition.

Petition is Accepted (meets the minimum requirements for review and evaluation)

When the Director of NIOSH determines that the SEC petition meets the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, the petitioners, the Board, and the public will be notified. NIOSH will proceed with an evaluation of the petition and provide the petitioners and the Board with information on the steps of the evaluation and other required procedures.

An evaluation report will be given to the petitioners and the Board for review. The Board will review and discuss the evaluation report and submit a recommendation to add or deny adding the class to the SEC to the Secretary of HHS. The petitioners will be notified of the Board’s recommended decision.

The Secretary of HHS, after considering information and recommendations provided by NIOSH, the Board, and from the administrative review, if applicable, will submit the final recommended decision to add or deny adding the class to the SEC to Congress. If Congress takes no action that effects the Secretary of HHS’s final decision, it will take effect in 30 calendar days after the date the Secretary of HHS’s report is submitted to Congress. The Secretary of HHS will provide a report to DOL and the petitioners containing the definition of the class and either the addition of the class to the SEC and/or the result of any action by Congress that effects the decision. A notice will also be published in the Federal Register notifying the public of all decisions.

No, if the SEC petition meets the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, the class does not automatically get added to the SEC. Meeting the minimum requirements for review and evaluation just means that the petition will continue in the SEC petition process. The petition will receive a full evaluation by NIOSH, the Board, and HHS.

The date and time of the meeting will be posted in the Federal Register and on the Advisory Board page of our website. Joshua Kinman, NIOSH SEC Petition Counselor, also notifies petitioners of Board meetings where the petition will be discussed.

the definition of the class of employees covered by the recommendation

a recommendation as to whether or not the Secretary should designate the class as an addition the SEC

the relevant criteria under 42 CFR 83.13(c) and findings and information upon which the recommendation is based, including NIOSH evaluation reports, information provided by the petitioner(s), any other information considered by the Advisory Board, and the deliberations of the Advisory Board.

Secretary of HHS Makes a Final Decision on the Class

After the Secretary makes a recommended decision, the report containing the recommended decision is sent to the petitioners. This report includes a description of the relevant criteria and summary of the information and findings that the recommended decision is based upon.

Secretary Makes a Final Decision to Add the Class to the SEC

When a decision is made to add a class, the Secretary provides Congress with a report of the final decision, the definition of the class of employees covered by the decision, and the criteria and findings upon which the decision was based for classes to be added to the SEC. If Congress takes no action that effects the Secretary’s decision, the Secretary’s decision to add the class of employees will take effect 30 calendar days after the date the Secretary of HHS’ report is submitted to Congress.

SEC Petition Evaluation Report

The SEC rule requires that NIOSH evaluate all petitions that meet the minimum requirements to add a class of employees to the SEC. The evaluation is intended to provide a fair, science-based determination of whether it is feasible to estimate with sufficient accuracy the radiation doses of the class of employees through NIOSH dose reconstructions. NIOSH documents its findings in an SEC Petition Evaluation Report.

Once completed, the SEC Petition Evaluation Report is provided to the petitioner(s) and to the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health. The evaluation will then be discussed by the Advisory Board, which provides advice to the Secretary of Health and Human Services on whether to add a class of employees to the SEC.

Yes, SC&A’s pre-decisional reports are provided to the petitioners, the public, and all pertinent Advisory Board Work Groups. The reports are also posted on our website on the Advisory Board page, under the “Reports from the Technical Support Contractor” section, and the work site page to which they apply. Copies of the report can also be obtained by contacting NIOSH directly at 513-533-6800 (toll-free at 1-877-222-7570) or by e-mail at dcas@cdc.gov or ocas@cdc.gov.

No, the Advisory Board does not always task its technical contractor, SC&A, to review the report. The Advisory Board decides when to task its technical contractor to perform a review of an SEC Petition Evaluation Report, and on what areas the review will focus.

The petitioner has 30 days to request a review of NIOSH’s decision. If a review has been requested, NOSH will make the final decision as to whether to accept or deny the petition based on results of the review.

NIOSH

The decision to accept or deny a petition because it does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation becomes a final decision in 31 days if there is not a request by the petitioner to review the decision.

The 180 day time frame begins when NIOSH receives a petition and ends when NIOSH sends the SEC Petition Evaluation Report of that petition to the Advisory Board. This time does not include days when the petitioner is working on a response to a deficiency in the petition that affects the qualification of the petition or on clarification of information for qualifying the petition.

NIOSH makes every effort to meet the 180-day deadline to provide an SEC Petition Evaluation Report to the petitioner and to the Advisory Board. However, there are circumstances where NIOSH is unable to meet the 180-day time frame. This is most often due to data capture problems, either where a facility is having difficulty locating or assembling the records requested, or where DOE does not have the resources available to process the data.

The evaluation of a qualified petition includes in-depth research on the available monitoring records and worker data to determine if NIOSH has the information needed to reconstruct radiation doses with sufficient accuracy, and if it does not, whether the radiation doses may have endangered the health of the class of workers defined in the petition. This in-depth research may take longer than 180 days.

When a petition covers a very broad time frame, it also can take additional time to evaluate the petition.

In addition, NIOSH’s evaluation often goes well beyond the issues the petitioner identified in the petition. A petition might have identified a small number of issues to qualify, but NIOSH will review past Evaluation Reports, issues that are under review by the Advisory Board and its technical contractor, and any issues that might have arisen during NIOSH’s site research and add those issues to the list to be researched during the evaluation process. This ensures that NIOSH has made a thorough investigation of potential reasons that it might not be able to complete dose reconstructions with sufficient accuracy and if the radiation doses may have endangered the health of the class of workers.

The Secretary of HHS has 30 days from receipt of the Advisory Board’s recommendation to submit his decision to Congress. If this 30-day deadline is not met and the Advisory Board has recommended adding the class, the class will be added to the SEC automatically, even if the Secretary’s decision would have been to deny adding the class.

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

No formal timeframes have been placed on the Advisory Board to submit a recommendation to the Secretary of HHS at this time. The Board, however, has informally agreed to submit its recommendation to the Secretary within 21 days after the determination by the Advisory Board of their recommendation.

Not always. After an SEC Petition Evaluation Report is presented to the Advisory Board, the Board may form a Work Group to review the report or task the technical contractor assisting the board (Sanford Cohen & Associates-SC&A) to perform a review of the report before making a recommendation. If the Advisory Board tasks SC&A to conduct an independent review of the report, the Board’s Work Group will review SC&A’s findings and discuss any technical issues that have been identified. The Advisory Board will make a recommendation on the SEC petition after all identified issues have been evaluated.

Petition is Denied (does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation)

If the SEC petition does not meet the minimum requirements for review and evaluation, NIOSH will notify petitioners of any requirements that the petition failed to meet and provide guidance to the petitioners in developing the relevant information.

Petitioners have 30 calendar days from the date of notification to revise the petition. If, after 30 days, the petition remains unqualified, NIOSH will issue a decision that the petition does not qualify for evaluation. Petitioners then have 30 calendar days to request a review of that decision. If a review has been requested, NIOSH will make the final decision as to whether to accept or deny the petition based on results of the review. If at the end of the 30 calendar days the petition does not meet the minimum requirements or is not reviewed, NIOSH’s proposed finding will become a final decision.

Secretary Makes a Final Determination Denying Addition of the Class to the SEC

The Office of the Secretary Administrative Review Guidance Cdc-pdf[88 KB (3 pages)] document provides guidance regarding the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Administrative Review process. It includes a summary of the regulations at 42 CFR § 83.18 (“How can petitioners obtain an administrative review of a final decision by the Secretary?”), as well as additional instructions on how to appeal the Secretary’s determination to deny adding a class of employees to the SEC.