• A modest proposal for wealthy countries to reforest their land for the common good• Asia’s real contribution to the global health of forests• Debt-for-nature swaps• Forests plus: looking outside the box•Leaders define pathway to restoring 150 million ha of lost forests• Ministers back binding European forest agreement• Plans to protect forests could do more harm than good unless power is in local hands

Non-Wood News 23

An information bulletin on Non-Wood Forest Products

November 2011

Anniversaries are times of reflection, and reflections provide a good opportunity to look back in order to move forward with continued commitment. This edition of Non-Wood News is the twentieth issue I have been involved in: my involvement started with issue 3 in March 1996. Changes have obviously taken place during this time, but important issues still remain. For example, issue 3 included an article on “Bioprospecting or biopiracy?”, covering plant-based pharmaceutical potential, a topic that is still relevant today and a regular feature in our News and Notes section for many years. Much progress has been made in this area since 1996, as can be seen from the recent historic Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing. In acknowledgement of this, in the present issue we have a Special Feature on “Recognition of traditional knowledge”, which includes articles on bioprospecting and benefit sharing, as well as information on how countries are developing policies to protect traditional knowledge from biopiracy.

Over the years, we have strengthened our reporting on the role of people, their communities and their use of NWFPs. Mindful that “Forests for People” is the theme of the International Year of Forests 2011, we have reflected this focus throughout this issue. For example, we provide information on how NWFPs are used in Amazonian life (Special Feature); how people are using rattan in a sustainable way in the Greater Mekong (International Action); how a project in Central Africa is helping communities achieve greater food security (Country Compass, International Action); and how edible insects – important food sources in many forest communities – are now being considered as an alternative solution to livestock in feeding a hungry world (Products and Markets, and Country Compass).

A strong feature of the 1996 issue was its Country Compass section. This emphasis
has been maintained over the years and throughout the current issue, which
includes news reports and readers’ contributions from 34 countries: in fact, you
will find diverse stories ranging from wildlife in Afghanistan and the economic value
of NTFPs in Canada, to the impacts on beekeeping of the earthquake and tsunami
in Japan, as well as the ecological and financial impacts of the bushmeat trade in
Zimbabwe.

The use of the Internet has also brought changes, with more readers now contacting us –
and each other – through e-mail (non-wood-news@fao.org). In fact, one of the aims of Non-
Wood News is to enable networking among readers. Contributions from readers in this issue
cover a variety of subjects, including the potential of nettles in the Indian Himalayas,
conservation ethnobotany in the North Atlantic, reconciling selective logging with the livelihood
importance of NWFPs, and pine resin extraction in southern Europe. Contacts with readers
have also led to joint initiatives; for example, we have entered into a copublishing agreement
with CIFOR to produce a book on the Amazon, and our next issue will help the Rainforest
Alliance celebrate 20 years of their Kleinhans Fellowships (see Readers’ Response).

So, thank you to all readers for your contributions. Whether it is an article or highlighting an event or publication on NWFPs,
these contributions have played an integral part in putting together Non-Wood News. Reader feedback is always useful and
much appreciated so please do continue to contact us.

Finally, our reflections on the past 20 issues demonstrate that we here at Non-Wood News need and will take every opportunity to
move forward in our efforts to promote the importance and potential income-generating aspects of NWFPs, as well as the recognition
that many people depend upon them – whether for their livelihoods, their health or as a source of food.

NON-WOOD NEWS

Is compiled and coordinated by Tina Etherington of the FAO Forest Economics, Policy and Products Division. For
this issue, editing support was provided by Giulia Muir and Sandra Rivero; language editing by Roberta Mitchell,
Anouchka Lazarev and Deliana Fanego; design, graphics and desktop publishing by Claudia Tonini.

Non-Wood News is open to contributions by readers. Contributions are welcomed in English, French and Spanish and may be edited to fit the appropriate size and focus of the bulletin.
If you have any material that could be included in the next issue of Non-Wood News for the benefit of other readers,
kindly send it, before 31 January 2012, to:
NON-WOOD NEWS – FOEI
FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00153 Rome, Italy
E-mail: non-wood-news@fao.orgwww.fao.org/forestry/nwfp/nonwood.htm

All Internet links cited were checked on 24 October 2011. Articles express the views of their authors, not necessarily
those of FAO. Authors may be contacted directly for their reference sources. The designations employed and the
presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of
the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal status of any country,
territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

Non-wood forest products (NWFPs) are goods of biological origin other than wood, derived from
forests, other wooded land and trees outside forests. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs), another term frequently used to cover this vast array of animal and plant products, also include small wood and fuelwood. However, these two terms are used synonymously throughout this bulletin. Other terms, such as “minor”, “secondary” or “speciality” forest products, are sometimes used to keep original names and/or titles. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.