(A) Schematic of steps in the biofabrication of the implant model. (B) Schematic of the study methods. First, alginate hydrogel beads and 3D‐printed PCL scaffolds were analyzed individually. Next, alginate and PCL were combined in one construct to develop an auricular implant model. PCL: Poly‐ε‐caprolactone.

As users around the world embrace 3D printing, the impacts continue to grow in a wide range of industries—but particularly medicine as researchers make strides in their own labs with bioprinting, as well as creating medical devices, implants, prostheses, and more. And although 3D printing in the realm of hearing devices and bioprinting of ear tissue is not entirely new, researchers in the Netherlands have been working on a novel method for auricular reconstruction.

“Tissue engineering, in combination with novel biofabrication strategies, is a promising solution to engineer auricular implants with patient‐derived donor cells. These biofabricated auricular constructs could ultimately function as patient‐specific implants for the reconstruction of a deformed auricle,” state the researchers in their paper.

The key for the these scientists was in finding a scaffold strong enough to bear cell growth as well as that of resulting tissue. This type of new scaffold must be durable but also porous and able to break down easily in terms of biodegradability. Bioink composed of synthetic or natural hydrogel could be used for 3D printing cells, or there is also the option of fabricating the support scaffolds and then adding the cell-hydrogel mixture. Poly‐ε‐caprolactone (PCL) is a plastic material used successfully to create scaffolds strong enough for such a purpose.

Scaffolds were created with differences in strands:

400 μm

600 μm

800 μm

1000 μm

1200 μm

Customized software created G-code, and medical-grade PCL was 3D printed on a 3DDiscovery. Afterward, the molds were cleaned, sterilized, and sealed. The researchers evaluated each sample’s structure using a microscope, digital camera, and fiber optic light. They then assessed cell viability, after which biomechanical analysis examined PCL scaffolds and the alginate hydrogel itself.

CAD view, gross view, and microscopic views of 3D‐printed PCL scaffolds with varying distances between strands. S represents the sample, with the number representing the distances between strands in micrometers (μm).

They then found that the scaffolds were viable:

“The structural properties of 3D printed PCL scaffolds were determined by examining the surface porosity and mechanical properties. Macroscopic analysis of the PCL scaffolds showed good printing quality,” stated the researchers. “However, microscopic analysis of individual PCL strands showed some variance in strand diameter over a short distance. In addition, the lateral view of the scaffold showed a large variety in pore width. Overall, the smaller the pore width, the more accurate the 3D printed scaffold.”

Overall results were examined further as the researchers considered the following:

Structural properties of 3D‐printed PCL

Cell viability and proliferation in alginate hydrogel beads

Hydrogel biomechanical properties

Neocartilage formation

Auricular implant model

The researchers state that the 3D printed cartilage implant does indeed possess the type of mechanical properties required to withstand challenges during in vivo tissue maturation, as well as a natural core that is able to form tissue.

“The mold can be easily printed and assembled, while the design makes it easy to inject any suitable hydrogel for tissue formation,” concluded the researchers. “While long‐term in vivo experiments are required to test its preclinical applicability, the work presented in this study provides a possible strategy for the use of biofabricated tissue constructs in the clinic.”

What do you think of this 3D printing news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

A) Gross view of the PCL‐alginate auricular implant model. Alginate can be found inside the grooves of the PCL mold. Note that one part of the 2‐part mold has been taken off for viewing. (B) in vitro cultured PCL‐alginate auricular implant models. (C) LIVE/DEAD stain of alginate taken out of the PCL mold after 21 days of culture. High‐cell survival was seen throughout the entire implant model.