Sunday, December 22, 2013

An important note: Nancy Willing argues vehemently that this post smears Mr. Grimaldi, and that he certainly has his own side to these lurid stories, as she argues here, here, and here, among other places. Moreover, Nancy tells me (I wouldn't know) that Mr. Grimaldi doesn't even own a gun. That said, I think she misses the overall point of the post in her anger that I chose her friend to use to make that point. And, I've made the point more clearly above. But if you get the linkage to Minority Report and the reference to a Pre-Crimes Unit, then you'll get the point. If not, read the post above for a more explicit explanation.

The whole point of the resurrected HB 88 is to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally unstable and potentially violent, right?

uhm, I messaged you privately in a fb chat and you decided to go ahead and publish bit and starts of the private conversation. It would have been more helpful if you'd A) asked if and what part of the private chat you were welcome to use publicly and B) I don't know if Grimaldi owns a gun but I do not think he does. So, could you please, please, stop taking private conversations public without permission? If I knew you wanted to publish that and other statements I made privately I would have said - hold off until I have a chance to ask David. Thanks.

get a grip, the only possible "confidential" aspect of your message was that you didn't think Mr. Grimaldi owned a firearm. the rest of it was complaining that I didn't acknowledge that he had a side to his story or your posts I tried to correct the record on both accounts. aside from not giving you a damn unicorn you got what you wanted now you bitch about it.