THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.

Translate

Thursday, February 9, 2017

U.S. SUPREME COURT ASKED TO HEAR APPEAL OVER BAN ON HELPING YOUTH STRUGGLING WITH HOMOSEXUALITY

U.S. SUPREME COURT ASKED TO HEAR APPEAL OVER BAN ON HELPING YOUTH STRUGGLING

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

WASHINGTON —A religious rights organization has petitioned the U.S. Supreme

Court to hear an appeal regarding California’s ban on “conversion therapy” and

counseling youth to resist romantic desires toward the same sex.

“SB 1172 directly violates the fundamental constitutional
right to privacy in that it prohibits minors from defining their own
existence. The law prevents minors from accessing mental health services
and spiritual mentoring that would assist them in diminishing same-sex
attraction in accordance with self-defined religious, moral, cultural,
and philosophical beliefs,” the Writ of Certiorari recently filed by the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) reads.As previously reported,
in 2012, as the ban was being contemplated in the legislature, Gov.
Jerry Brown remarked that he hoped reparative therapy would be forever
heaved into “the dustbin of quackery.” The bill’s author, Democratic
Sen. Ted Lieu of Torrance, claimed that counseling and therapy aimed at
helping youth turn from the homosexual lifestyle is the equivalent of
“psychological child abuse.”
The legislation
prohibited any type of “conversion therapy,” “sexual orientation
therapy,” “reparative therapy” or “sexual orientation change efforts,”
by licensed therapists and counselors, but did not apply to those who
“provide acceptance, support, and understanding of clients or the
facilitation of clients’ coping, social support, and identity
exploration and development, including sexual orientation-neutral
interventions to prevent or address unlawful conduct or unsafe sexual
practices; and do not seek to change sexual orientation.”

It pointed to statements from the American School Counselor
Association, the American Counseling Association, the American Academy
of Pediatrics and others.
“No one should stand idly by while children are being
psychologically abused, and anyone who forces a child to try to change
their sexual orientation must understand this is unacceptable,” Lieu
wrote in a written statement.
Soon after the bill became law, PJI and the Florida-based
Liberty Counsel filed suit in hopes of obtaining an injunction against
its enforcement. A psychiatrist, a licensed therapist who also oversees a
church counseling ministry, and a resident who struggles with same-sex
attraction and has been helped by the therapy were all represented in
the suit.

“School counselors in private religious schools will only be
allowed to give counseling that affirms same-sex attraction,” lamented
PJI President Brad Dacus. “Youth in the early stages of puberty, when it
is normal for them to be curious, often have fears that they may be
homosexual. These youth are going to be subjected to tremendous
victimization [via the affirmation that is] mandated through every
counselor in the state of California.”
As the legal battle continues five years later, PJI has now
appealed its case to the U.S. Supreme Court, presenting questions such
as, “May a state bar ministers from inculcating or encouraging certain
religious values in youth, when those ministers are also licensed by the
state as mental health providers?”
“Are minors’ rights to privacy, autonomy, and
self-definition violated by a State’s determination that they may only
seek to reduce same-sex attraction on their own or with the assistance
of unlicensed individuals, and they may not seek professional help to do
so?” the legal challenge also asks the court to determine.
Plaintiff Donald Welch, who serves at Skyline Wesleyan
Church in LaMesa, says that the law now subjects him to potential
discipline by the California Board of Behavioral Sciences if he counsels
youth in accordance with the Scriptures.
“In his pastoral role, Dr. Welch is prohibited from
encouraging, enabling or validating sexual beliefs or behaviors contrary
to the teachings of the Church. Dr. Welch’s clientele includes minors
who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, heterosexual and questioning
youth,” the lawsuit notes, pointing to conflict between his job as a
church counselor and the law.
PJI says that if the court accepts the case, it could be one of the most significant of 2017.
“If the Supreme Court grants our petition for Certiorari,
this will be the most important freedom of religion case for this year
and will impact the rights of counseling ministries across the country,
potentially for generations to come,” Dacus said in a statement.

PAYPAL.ME-SUPPORT THIS BLOG

INFOWARS: THE FOURTH ESTATE, NOT STAR WARS

Adolf Hitler

ACTS 5:29

“Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.”

GEORGE WASHINGTON:

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

THOMAS JEFFERSON 1800

"I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

GOD ABOVE GOVERNMENT

Bible Obedience; Civil Disobedience

DISCLAIMER

Disclaimer: We are not responsible for all views posted on this website. Authors of articles, videos and/or selected texts are solely responsible for the content of their material. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Those sharing stories or testimonies are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of www.ratherexposethem.blogspot.com and/or its author.Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Total Pageviews

Content in full or in part may be copyrighted.. Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger.