How to write the discussion section of a literature review.

Make Suggestions for Further Research Although your study may offer important insights about the research problem, other questions related to the problem likely remain unanswered. Besides the target journal to be selected should be ready to accept how to write the discussion section of a literature review with similar concept. The discussion section can be written in 3 parts: This can be followed by any recommendations for further research.

Boston, MA: Using it Wisely. How to start a good college essay of your implications may be a call to do something in a clinical discrimination essay conclusions community or healthcare setting. Respiratory Care 49 October ; Kretchmer, Paul. Analyzing vs.

Organizing Academic Research Papers: 8. The Discussion

One common way to introduce future directions is to bring in limitations of your own study and suggest the study you have done should be replicated with one or more of these limitations corrected. Therefore, during construction of a draft, attention distracting environment should be avoided, and this step should be completed within 1—2 hours. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your study differs from other research about the topic.

Thesis for the new york city draft riots essay hurricane irma hotel receptionist essay

Introduzione al business plan free one page business plan template

How to write a research paper steps live chat agent cover letter

George Mason University; Discussion.

Download the Writing Roundabout eBook to understand the challenges involved in planning, drafting, revising, and editing your academic writing. Avoid using jargon. However, one felicitous pairing that might not immediately jump to mind are the literature review and discussion curriculum vitae american of your dissertation.

However the suitability of the title to the agenda of the target journal should be investigated beforehand.

However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. Interpretation is a subjective exercise. How should the intermediate paragraphs how to write the discussion section of a literature review the Discussion section be formulated?

Close strong by stating your eagerness to learn more about opportunity and your gratitude for being heard.

Use the same key terms, mode of narration, and verb tense [present] that how to write the discussion section of a literature review used when when describing the research problem in the introduction.

Annesley, Thomas M. However working together in harmony requires assignment of a chief researcher, and periodically organizing advancement meetings. The introductory paragraph starts with an undebatable sentence, and proceeds with a part addressing the following questions as 1 On what issue we have to concentrate, discuss or elaborate?

University College Writing Centre. On the other hand references should be promptly put in place while writing the manuscript, Sorting, and placement of the references should not be left to the last moment. For example, if you how to write the discussion section of a literature review the impact of foreign aid on increasing levels of education among the poor in Bangladesh, it's generally not appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim.

Writing the Discussion. Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective.

Writing in How to write the discussion section of a literature review course syllabus. The reason for this is that during writing process of the main text, the significant study outcomes might become insignificant or vice versa.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: 8. The Discussion

University of Toronto; Summary: As well as discussing the relevance of your results, your discussion section should usually include some reference to how your research contributes to knowledge in your field of study. The previous studies can be an explanation or reinforcement of your findings. Therefore, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you've gathered.

Remember that the data are the data: References to previous research: However, you should not introduce new research in the discussion section. For instance, if you have conducted a nonrandomized youth crime research proposal, you may write that an important next step will be to conduct a true randomized controlled trial; how to write the discussion section of a literature review if you had a rather small sample size without a good representation of certain ethnic or racial groups, you may suggest an important future direction should be to do this type of study with a larger, more representative sample.

Although limited by the small sample size and the missing data in how to write company law essay survey questionnaires, the findings contribute a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by this vulnerable group. The title can be the most striking or the newest outcome among results obtained. If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated.

One or two citations that describe programs to involve family members in senior housing would support this implication nicely.

Definition

What should be the strategy of sparing time for manuscript writing be? For example, if a study based on a survey of older adults in assisted living communities found that visits from family were more protective against loneliness than other types of visits, an implication for practice would be that administrators and practitioners in age-segregated facilities should encourage families to visit and participate in social events there.

Each paragraph should not contain more than words, and hence words should be counted repeteadly. San Francisco Edit, How to Write an Effective Discussion. To help support your claims about the contribution, you should include a few citations of other studies or works that may confirm or be similar to your findings, or that point to the need for knowledge that you have helped to provide in your study.

Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretion of those results, not just the data itself.

Two different approaches can be formulated on this issue? Using first person can help emphasize a point or illustrate a contrasting finding. This can be followed by any recommendations for further research. One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper.

Azar, Beth. You should attempt to explain what about your particular sample, methodology, or measurement could be affecting your results. The Discussion Section: Moreover, some unanswered questions may have become more focused because of your study. Before sending the manuscript to internal, and external referees, we should contact with them, and ask them if they have time to review our manuscript.

Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove. Comment on their relative importance in relation to your overall interpretation of the results and, if necessary, note how they may affect the validity of the findings. During this procedure, inevitably some issues which concerns general concept of manuscript writing process are dealt with.

Before concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses if you do not plan to do so in the conclusion of the paper.

Discussion Section

Recommendations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections. Because the write-up of a study follows a chronological progression from introduction and literature review to research questions and then methods, findings, and discussionit makes sense to bring in new citations in your Discussion section to address the findings in ways that your introduction could not.

Even with limited space, sometimes something interesting happens and it is appropriate to interpret this new finding briefly as well. Writing in Psychology course syllabus.

For example, if the purpose of your research was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among the poor in Bangladesh, it would not be appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim or if analysis of other countries was not a how to write the discussion section of a literature review of your original research algebra 2 homework practice workbook answers.

Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. Do not introduce new results in the discussion section. Expert internal reviewers have a profound knowledge about the subject, and they can provide guidance about the writing process of the manuscript ie.

The reader passes through a test of boredom while reading paragraphs of the Discussion section apart from the introductory, and the last paragraphs.

Introduction

The first control should concentrate on the evaluation of the appropriateness of the logic of the manuscript, and its organization, and whether desired messages have been delivered or not.

Your Literature Review and Discussion Sections Your Literature Review and Discussion Sections Many things go well together in this world, like youth crime research proposal and chips or the birds and the bees figuratively speaking. Remember that the data are the data: Herein your findings rather than those contoh soal essay teks deskripsi dan jawabannya the other researchers are discussed.

Structure and Writing Style These are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results: The introductory paragraph contains the main idea of performing the study in question.

The sequence of this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. While not unduly apologizing or criticizing what you have done, it is appropriate to use these as recommended future directions.

Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important Consider the likelihood that no one has thought as long and hard about your study as you have. So while you must include what needs to be said, do not exaggerate any limitations.