Subscribe to this blog

LIKE THIS BLOG? Get the latest post in your email box

When a Novelist Defies All Conventions: "The Blazing World"

Siri Hustvetd's latest novel, The Blazing World, defies all
conventions about novel writing. Its format is quite literally like no other
novel ever written (that I know of), which is why I bought it and read
it. I love it when someone has the courage to break
down all the rules. It's wonderful to find yourself in unknown,
undiscovered territory. Very refreshing.The Blazing
World is a novel different in both form and structure. To begin with,
it presents itself like non-fiction. It pretends to be the work of an
"editor" who has put together a biography/portrait of a recently deceased contempory
artist, Harriet Burden. The (fictitious) editor uses, as
is always done in this kind of work, testimonials from art critics,
family and friends and extracts from the artist's personal diary.This
format enables the author to tell Harriet Burden's story from various
points of views. I was struck by the novelist's remarkable ability to
change "voice" and convincingly draw a highly sensitive portrait, as
Harriet is differently perceived by the people who knew her. From
the start, you are told that she has recently shaken the New York art
scene, putting on highly successful shows using male artists as "screens" or pseudonyms
for her work. She has used three artists, two unknowns and one
well-known, for this bizarre project that she has called "maskings" - a
project intended to "prove" that one's perception of the art one sees is
governed by one's knowledge of the artist. In particular, she wants to show that art made by a man sells better than art made by a woman; that
there is a diffuse gender bias in the art world. Harriet Burden's art
had never attained prominence when it was shown under her own name but now it suddenly achieves success simply because it is seen by the public as the work of a
man.Harriet Burden's plans go awry when Rune, the third
artist who is a celebrity in his own right, refuses to reveal that she
is the author of the show. He takes on all the critical acclaim, leaving
her in the dirt. She smarts from the injustice and as a reader, you
smart along with her - which shows how effective the author's writing
is.No spoilers and I won't give out more of the plot,
except to say that the story is practically known from the start. That's
another peculiarity of this novel: there is next to no suspense. You
know from the first page that Harriet is dead and you know very soon what
happens to the man who betrayed her (the third artist in her "maskings"
project).So why do you keep reading? Because of the
superb writing of course, and because of something else too. Questions
are asked that you never thought of asking. The book is filled with gems
- insights into life and art and the human condition. The sort of thing
that gives you arresting moments of self-revelation and a deeper
understanding of the world around you.

Here's a few quotes to give you an idea:

"...it is not what is said that makes us who we are. More often, it
is what remains unspoken" (this came up in connection with Harriet's
upbringing and difficult relationship with her father);

"It is my time, and I will not let them take it away from me. The
Greeks knew that the mask in the theater was not a disguise but a means
of revelation. And now that I have started, I can feel the winds behind
me...(Harriet, commenting on her "maskings" project);

"Mostly, the art business has been about men. And when it has been
about women, it has often been about correcting past oversights. It is
interesting that not all, but many women were celebrated only when their
days as desirable sexual objects had passed."

"Human beings are the only animals who kill for ideas."

"Celebrity is life in the third person."

I actually underlined the book 51 times. That (for me) is
something of a record and a good indication of how much I enjoyed it
(lucky I read the digital version, if it had been the printed one, it
would have looked very messy indeed).Is
there anything wrong with this novel?

Yes, for anyone looking for
suspense. There is none.

And yes, there's a little too much about art,
perception and gender. To a large extent - you're warned! - this is a
feminist book. Harriet Burden makes a lot of allusions to philosophers
in her diaries, allusions that would get lost or misunderstood without
(very academic) footnotes. So you find yourself reading the footnotes.
Actually, there's a certain, perverse pleasure in reading them but at
times, it does become a little too much. And perhaps, while the
footnotes make sense in a book that pretends to be non-fiction, they
certainly detract from the pleasure of reading the book as a novel - in
principle, a form that never has any footnotes (unless it's a classic
for school use).My conclusion? It is well worth
reading and I highly recommend it. But it really isn't a novel as such -
more an intellectual joy ride. I doubt that this book will spawn off
many more books of the same type. The format is enticing but not easy to
follow or reproduce.However this total departure from the
novel form is interesting inasmuch it seems to indicate that we may be
reaching a certain degree of fatigue with the "standard" novel and the
three act structure. We live in an age of experimentation. That is certainly what I did in Luna Rising (in Book One, I combined novel and play writing). Many books
lately are "cross-genre" and even "serialized" (broken up in bits like a
TV series, making them easier to consume in our fast-paced,
attention-squandering digital age). And of course we have fictionalized
biographies and documentaries.

For those curious about the author: she is the wife of Paul Auster and author of five internationally acclaimed novels, The Sorrows of an American, What I Loved, The Enchantment of Lily Dahl, The Blindfold, and The Summer Without Men, as well as nonfiction, notably Living, Thinking, Looking, a compendium of 32 essays about philosophy, memory and imagination. The same questions that animate The Blazing World recur here: How do we see, remember, and feel? How do we interact with other people?
What does it mean to sleep, dream, and speak? What is "the self"?

The Blazing World, just published (March 13, 2014) is available on Amazon here and Living, Thinking, Looking can be found here. Note that The Blazing World is expressedly called after Margaret Cavendish's own magnum opus (available here - yes, titles cannot be copyrighted!)

Margaret Cavendish was a 17th century aristocrat and a brilliant scientist and philosopher who suffered from that fact that, being a woman, she wasn't taken seriously by anyone in her own time, though she corresponded with Descartes and Hobbes. Siri Hustvetd's main character, Harriet Burden, considers Cavendish as her idol and role model.

Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle (1623-1673)

Blazing World was reviewed by the New York Times, see here, as well as in the following articles in the British press:

Popular Posts

In the 40 years I have lived in Rome, I have never seen the city is such bad shape, graffiti vandalizing graceful, ancient buildings everywhere, piles of dirt and s--t on the sidewalks, potholes in the streets, large enough to trap a scooter's wheel and kill the driver.

A friend of mine, Giuseppe Bonanno, in desperation, put up this blog post that I reproduce here - if you read Italian, you'll find it a good, rousing read...though depressing: When will the newly elected Mayor of Rome, Ms. Raggi do something?

And she's so new to the political game (she comes from the 5 Star protest party) and young (just 37), can she defeat "Mafia Capitale" as it is known here, i.e. the incredible corruption that has been linking local politicians to the Mafia for decades and that has led Rome to this final, dramatic juncture?

So far, what she's done is meet with the Pope, here's the video:

Here's Giuseppe Bonanno's blog post, if you want to read this on his blog, …

I just reviewed Steve Case's bestseller, “THE THIRD WAVE – AN ENTREPRENEUR’S VISION OF THE FUTURE” for Impakter Magazine:

When Steve Case’s book came out on 5 April 2016 (publisher: Simon and Schuster), it was an immediate New York Times and Wall Street Journal sensation, hailed as the number one business book of the year.

Part memoir, part business manual, it’s a must read for at least two reasons: one, because it is a unique memoir from someone who was on the leading edge of the Internet revolution: Steve Case was a co-founder of AOL in 1985, the first Internet company to go public (in 1991), the first to bring millions of Americans online; AOL was a corporate giant that arose a full decade before Google, Amazon and Facebook; Case oversaw the Time Warner-AOL merger in 2000 and became chairman of the combined business, the largest media and communications empire in the world at that time.It is clear that any aspiring entrepreneur could learn from Case’s unique insights into the st…

Another one of my articles published on Impakter - I interviewed the founder of Authorea, a startup for scientists to share and advance research. Here is his picture, his name is Alberto Pepe, he's a young Italian astrophysicist who now lives in New York:

And here is the start of the article:

You’d think that writing scientific papers today, with all the digital tools at hand, would be a breeze. But you’d be wrong. Scientific work is not helped along by the Internet but challenged by it.

Why?

Because scientists, for the most part, still follow traditional methods for sharing their research findings. Or, as young Italian astrophysicist Alberto Pepe put it in an interviewwith Il Corriere della Sera, a major Italian daily, “Scientists today produce 21st century research; they use the writing tools of the 20th century and force their writing into formats similar to those of the 18th century.”

In short, the way scientific articles are written goes back 400 years, and the ability to sha…