As I noted at the time, this was a very complex story and I had a pretty good hunch that Mrs. Sherrod was not the angel she appeared to be. I am correct. She is a picture perfect product of the liberal policies that make African-Americans dependent on the Federal Government and foster a victimization mentality. Mrs. Sherrod claimed she learned something when she helped that white farmer, but what she learned may be worse than the presumed racism from the clip of her at the NAACP meeting in March.

SHIRLEY SHERROD, FMR. GEORGIA DIRECTOR, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, USDA: I don’t think he’s [Andrew Breitbart] interested in seeing anyone get past it, because I think he’d like to get us stuck back in the times of slavery. That’s where I think he’d like to see all black people end up again. And that’s why –

ANDERSON COOPER: You think he’s a racist?

SHERROD: — I think he’s so vicious. Yes, I do. And I think that’s why he’s so vicious against a black president.

Are you f–ing kidding me?????? So Shirley is in the camp of — “If You Criticize Obama, You are a Racist”. Give me a bloody break.

He worshiped with Jeremiah Wright for years. He potentially appointed a racist black liberationist Marxist to the USDA. Just how many of them does he have around him, as he sits in the WH waging war on capitalism? And, finally, what might all those college documents of his they won’t let us see tell us about him … especially given this?

Ultimately, given all this now beginning to come out as a result of Andrew Breitbart’s original work makes him a hero in my book. These are the tough questions the press doesn’t even want to ask. It brings to the front important issues on race and racism, black, or otherwise, the press and the WH don’t wish to confront. But that’s what’s suppose to happen in a genuinely free, open and democratic society.

As things stand, an extremely controversial woman is sitting there with a free ticket for a promotion at the USDA from an incompetent in the WH who created this mess by appointing her, then firing her too quickly for some reason. This isn’t Breitbart’s mess. This is now Obama’s mess to clean up, or justify, as far as I’m concerned. Heckuva job, Barry. Heckuva job. At least we’re starting to get used to it. I believe the word is: incompetent.

Obama really does seem to have some of the strangest friends, just like Joan Walsh, of Sherrod’s white media conspiracy against blacks. Who’d a thunk it?

So I’m through with this story. The edited video was unfortunate, but the true racist stripes of the NAACP, the Sherrods, and the Obama Administration have certainly come out over a week’s time. So bravo, Mr. Breitbart. You hit the target.

It’s pretty messed up that you can’t criticize the president without being called a racist. People criticizing Obama don’t do so because he’s black, they do it because he’s an asshole. The constitution is being ignored, we have 2,500 page bills being signed into law that nobody has a chance to read with polls showing they are against the will of the people. I don’t care if your black, white or a flippin’ panda bear; when you ignore the document that makes America, AMERICA and ignoring the will of the people like a tyrant king then you are an asshole and you’re damn right he will be called out on it.

Call me a racist? Fine, you have successfully taken one of the most despicable acts human kind has seen and made it the equivalent of calling someone a butt head. It’s the boy that cried wolf. It has no more teeth making accusations of racism. Go ahead and keep playing the race card, liberals because i would rather be a faux-racist than an actual liberty-hating asshole.

Let us not forget that Vilsack and by default Obama have lashed themselves to her from now on. They took back the termination. Yes, she has yet to agree, but from this point on everything she says, whether in or out of the Administration she is ALL theirs. Hoist on their own race baiting petard is too good for the lot of em.

#4: “Let us not forget that Vilsack and by default Obama have lashed themselves to her from now on. They took back the termination. Yes, she has yet to agree, but from this point on everything she says, whether in or out of the Administration she is ALL theirs.”

Excellent point, Delusional Bill. Let’s hope that the mainstream press, including media outlets like the Oprah Winfrey Show and The View, continue to give Sherrod airtime because every time she opens her mouth, she confirms that she doesn’t object to people being accused of racism without proof–she only objects to people other than leftists accusing people of racism without proof. The more she talks, the more she sounds like a race-baiting hypocrite and that her supposed “transformation” really didn’t take.

The race industry has, IMO, poisoned this country beyond hope and killed any chance of a colorblind country where the only thing that matters is the content of one’s character.

A few years back, there was a report in the newspaper of Claire McCaskill (D-MO, white) stating that “George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black”.

At the time, I wrote her to ask if she was so blindingly stupid that she actually believes what she was saying or if she’s just plain evil.

What a sad irony that many americans voted for Obama because they wanted to prove to themselves and the rest of the world that it’s ok to have a black president. We all, even those of us who didn’t vote for him, wanted racism to be behind us.
Unfortunately, this guy and many black americans have taken us back many years by stirring the race pot. Do they think white americans will give them a pass a second time? We are all sick of this racial politics. I’m especially sad for the innocent black americans who are being dragged through this filth.

I read your blog all the time. I totally agree with you about the Sherrod episode. I jumped the gun myself and re-learned a valuable lesson. If you think about it, the Sunday shows didn’t need her because they all beat the drum of Fox and Breibart are racist. If she had been right in front of them they would not have asked any hard questions. Howard Dean accused Fox of that on their own show. Wallace shot him down with “I know facts are inconvenient”. The undercarriage of the Obama bus can’t fit too many more people.

The Center for Disease Control has issued a warning about a new virulent strain of this old disease. The disease is called Gonorrhea Lectim. It’s pronounced “Gonna re-elect ‘em,” and it is a terrible obamanation.

The disease is contracted through dangerous and high risk behavior involving putting your cranium up your rectum. Many victims contracted it in 2008…but now most people, after having been infected for the past 1-2 years, are starting to realize how destructive this sickness is.

It’s sad because Gonorrhea Lectim is easily cured with a new drug just coming on the market called Votemout. You take the first dose in 2010 and the second dose in 2012 and simply don’t engage in such behavior again; otherwise, it could become permanent and eventually wipe out all life as we know it.

[...] “So I’m through with this story. The edited video was unfortunate, but the true racist stripes of the NAACP, the Sherrods, and the Obama Administration have certainly come out over a week’s time. So bravo, Mr. Breitbart. You hit the target.” [...]

Isn’t it amazing that Mrs. Sherrod has never felt the need to apologize for the racism of her (presumed) past? Even Robert Byrd and George Wallace did that. I wonder if she ever told the couple that she (finally) helped that she was sorry for thinking the husband was a racist, and taking him to see “one of his own”?

There is the missing link in this story. Mrs. Sherrod doesn’t talk about that time in her life as if it was inherently wrong. Nor does she talk about her racist attitude as if it is a thing of the past. She doesn’t apologize for her “racist past”.

Is the fact that she eventually helped a white couple somehow supposed to negate her race-baiting? Or the conspiratorial tone with which she described the event to the NAACP gathering? She doesn’t deserve any kudos for helping a white couple once upon a time – it was her job to help. If that makes her a hero, then we have seriously degraded the qualifications for that designation.

The NAACP has to be nervously waiting for the next video to be posted by Breitbart. They look over their shoulder and see what he did to the other 5 character organization … ACORN… in revealing their true nature.

Yes they will come and get you if should you utter one word against the King Obama . Or so it seems. But we should not be surprised at his association with this couple of racist bigots , given the racist filth he sat through in church for years.
Nice to see someone turn around and see the truth.

#7: Yes, GP, I did notice that Sherrod’s media appearances suddenly dried up over the weekend. Clearly, the Obama Administration realized they were dealing with a loose cannon who is too dumb to realize that it might harm her image as a victim, wrongfully accused of racism without proof, if every time she opens her mouth on national television it’s to call some individual, political group, or news organization racists without proof. Like I said, this isn’t about evidence or the lack thereof. She believes only the Left is allowed to accuse other people of racism, period. Conservatives aren’t allowed to make such accusations, with OR without proof. In fact, this week we have learned the lesson that as far as the Left is concerned, a conservative accusing a black person of racism is racist. Black people simply can’t be racist. End of story.

What’s interesting is that conservatives certainly predicted that if Obama was elected President, it would not “heal” the nation on matters of race, but rather the accusation of racism would be leveled at anyone criticizing the Administration’s policies. That was an easy prediction to make and there’s no question it has turned out to be true. However, I don’t think conservatives predicted anything close to what we have seen since Obama’s inauguration. The Left, after claiming that Obama “transcends race” and proclaiming his victory a shining symbol of “racial healing,” immediately went on the attack and has been playing the race card to such an extent that all other political discourse has been virtually drowned out. What the Left really meant by “racial healing” is that Obama’s election to the Presidency confirmed that THEY were not racists. Conversely, everyone that did NOT support Obama is hopelessly, shamefully racist to the core. Consequently, thanks EXCLUSIVELY to the Left, the issue of race is the most predominant political issue of our time. The Left has intentionally polluted our culture with their vile, false accusations to the point that our country is just as divided as it was 6 or 7 decades ago when race actually WAS an issue. It’s sickening and it confirms that liberals know that racial harmony is a threat to their political influence. Liberals accuse conservatives of spreading the “politics of fear,” but if liberals can’t convince the weak-minded that racism, sexism, and homophobia lurks around every corner, their entire political philosophy consists of nothing more than stealing money from productive people and accepting the fact that once in a while people in other counties who hate us are going to kill some of us and there’s really nothing we can do about it. That’s not a very appealing mission statement, so to survive liberals spice it up with the lie that everything they do is motivated by correcting all of the injustices in the world.

More of Ms. Sherrod’s own words: “You know, I haven’t seen such a mean-spirited people as I’ve seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn’t it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush’s and we didn’t do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President.”
To quote a very well-liked poet by the Black community, Maya Angelou, “When people show you who they are, believe them.”

America is OVER 74% White and OVER 80% if you take out the ILLEGALS. America is OVER 80% Christian and over 92% Christian/Jewish. Yet these facts are being DENIED, omitted, and everyone else afforded ‘special rights”. ENOUGH. Lets all ensure that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. dream is kept alive and stop throwing away our values and who we ARE. God bless America!

Thank the lord David showed up to comment here! This comment thread was in danger of going on without a victim. Hey Dave, Festivus is not for a couple of months yet, so you’re gonna have to hold off with the airing of grievances. Poor lefties, the world is made of only two types of people; victims and villains. What a joke! The tremendous error we have made was ever taking the pack of whiners, that is the left, seriously.

Enjoyed your post. I thought the same at first, but changed my mind when she said on one of her talk show rounds that she may consider suing Breitbart over this. For what? It was her boss who didn’t stand by her — didn’t they ask her to explain this or get her side of the story before they fired her? Truly, the fault in the firing lies with her former boss and administration. They didn’t review the entire video until after she was fired. Then the backpedalling and apologizing began.

David,
Millions and millions of minority Americans (including women) are conservatives and regularly vote Republican. By proclaiming that those millions and millions of people are conservative solely because they suffer from some psychological condition (i.e. “self-loathing”), all you are proving is that you’re too stupid and/or intellectually lazy to learn what conservatives actually believe and then consider why those beliefs might appeal to minorities and not just “rich old white men.” I don’t think you realize how ignorant and uneducated you sound when you announce that millions and millions of people that you’ve never met belong to a political party that you disagree with because they hate themselves. You don’t have the first fu*king clue what we believe. You believe exactly what you are told to believe about conservatives because you’re a sheep and too stupid to think for yourself. I mean, it’s not like you made up that “self-loathing” and “rich old white men” stuff on your own. You started saying those things because some Democrat told you to believe it. And like a pathetic robot you just started saying it too. If that weren’t the truth, you would be capable of making an intelligent argument in opposition to what conservatives actually believe. Obviously, that’s beyond your intellect.

Republicans believe that minority members have just as much capability and ability to succeed as do non-minorities.

Obama Party members, such as yourself, believe that minority members are inferior and need the plantation kindness of the government to feed and wipe themselves.

The only reason the Obama Party cares about “rights” is that the Obama Party needs slaves who are helpless and dependent on their Obama Party massas to tell them what to do, what to think, and how to behave. Hence the Obama Party purchases these slaves like you with “rights”, such as jobs based on quotas instead of performance, reparations based on skin color, and so forth.

You accept plantation kindness at the price of staying on the plantation. It’s no surprise that you are terrified to leave it — and bitter and hateful towards those of us who have.

As an overseas observer on US politics for the last 10 years l cannot help but be amazed how self deluded American Right wingers who are minorities are.

You sit there and prostitute yourselves for a party who feel no shame in demonizing you, your friends and your loved ones an like battered spouses you defend them to the hilt in a vain idea that some of their money, and it comes down to money, will filter to you, which is why you support the false notion of trickle down economics.

It’s sad because Gonorrhea Lectim is easily cured with a new drug just coming on the market called Votemout. You take the first dose in 2010 and the second dose in 2012 and simply don’t engage in such behavior again;

Side effects may include erections lasting more than four years. Call your partner if this occurs.

The GOBP and right-wingers are all about rich old white men, corporate profits and creeping American fascism.

Rich old white men? You mean, like George Soros, Bill Clinton, John “No Taxes on my yacht” Kerry, and Al “Take Care of this” Gore?

Corporate profits? You mean like the billions in taxpayer dollars Obama and Tim Geithner have used to prop up their cronies at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and AIG? Or the other billions they used to prop up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Creeping American Fascism? You mean like when Shirley Sherrod suggests the Government shut down media outlets that criticize the president? You mean like the Justice Department refusing to prosecute thugs who engaged in voter intimidation on behalf of the ruling party?

The whole point of the RiehlWorld post was to allege that Mr. Sherrod was 1) a radical “black liberationist Marxist” and 2) a Communist, and is therefore not a Civil Rights hero, a racist, etc., etc.

But who do you think ran the Civil Rights movement? Popular historians, conservatives in particular, whitewash the fact that the movement was theologically aligned with liberationism, and philosophically aligned with Marxism. Everyone gets the idea that the Civil Rights movement was a collection of mainstream capitalists (who happened to be black) because people like Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks were savvy enough to put a socially acceptable face on what was, and still is, a very challenging ideology. The fact is, the Civil Rights movement was mainstream only in appearance, on substance it was always incredibly radical, especially by today’s standards, so stop being shocked when the NAACP or its affiliates don’t live up to the Huxtable family facade.

People like Mr. Sherrod spent their youth fighting Jim Crow laws in Selma, laws that were – surprise – supported and enabled by vote-stealing whites and Uncle Toms. Is his analysis of current day politics an accurate one, or a quaint throwback to a bygone era? I don’t know; I’m a 26 year old white man with a college education living in a nice middle class neighborhood, everybody wants to listen to what I have to say. Things may be different for people of color living elsewhere. And if they’re not, Mr. Sherrod is guilty of being an irrelevant curmudgeon, a throwback to a bygone era, but no less an important Civil Rights era figure.

If you want to side with Breitbart, that’s fine. But all this umbrage to justify the “racism” of the NAACP and to discredit Mrs. Sherrod (like the baffling assertion that her father was not lynched, ergo, she’s a liar) is just posturing as far as I’m concerned.

It pretty clever. Find some non-sense to distract people for 48~72 hours; find some republican to die it to; natter-natter-natter; rinse-wash-repeat. Keeps attention off the incompetence of the administration and focused on trivia. And it seems to work, more’s the pity…

It was so good to read a blog from someone who knows the truth about sherrod’s true intentions. She wasn’t hurt by that video one bit because as soon as she found out about the video being shown on tv she was seeing little holograms of dollar signs everywhere she went. She’ll just add this money to the money they received from tax payers in the first suit.

Let’s cut her some slack. She is obviously pretty stupid. I mean, she thinks opposition to ObamaCare(tm) is because he is black. Then how does she explain opposition to HillaryCare(tm) and RomneyCare(tm)?

Either you are stupid and make racist statements or you are racist an it makes you stupid. Or you are just plain stupid. Whatever.

Bruce look a little further into the mud on this one. Breitbart was set up with the first video. No sooner did he release the first with the intent of showing the world that the NAACP has sunk so low that they applaud racism amidst their ranks, right after they said in a double secret resolution to be released in October (funny the elections are in November) that the TEA Party needs to police their rank and file to throw out their racists. As soon as Breitbart released the vid another vid came out not refuting Breitbarts POV but making poor $13.3million “victim” and new sob story of the VRWConspiracy.
Following right behind the first vid was the WH demanding the poor dear to “pull over and resign” just like they did to the Inspector General Gerald whatshisname who caught Kevin Johnson of Sacramento. This smacks of coordination at the higher levels. Vilsack gets left holding the bag, bad white guy.
The MSM selectively gets outraged over Breitbart ignoring AB’s POV accusing him of race baithing and the whole plethora of evils that whities do. The meme goes on and on about how we shouldn’t jump the gun etc. etc..
The original video was from the NAACP, the second video was also from the NAACP all with the intention of outing Breitbart for calumning Sherrod.
I don’t think whoever thought of this scheme knew or thought out that it would expose the Reparations lawsuit of Reagan-Clinton racisim against blacks in the Pigford suit.
That to me is the real story but it will never see the light of day in the MSM. At this point Breitbart is taking a beating from the pundits both left and right while his original point is being ignored. Cue the crickets.

The GOBP Republican party and right-wingers are the party of white male, religious nutjobs that will support cooperate interests over civil rights, the environment, etc.

The GOBP and right-wingers are all about rich old white men, corporate profits and creeping American fascism.

So:

1) Rich old white men are the enemy. Take their money and make them bow and scrape.

2) Religious nutjobs must be neutered. Anyone who believes in hope and change (redemption, forgiveness, brotherly love) must be reeducated or isolated.

3) Corporate profits are pure greed. They feed the greed of retirement plans, the structure of insurance companies, endowment funds and the whole system of credit and loans. Down with profits and usury.

4) Never disturb the environment. Step on an ant and you must be immediately eliminated in an environmentally neutral manner.

5) Creeping American fascism is all around us. Even though Jonah Goldberg wrote an excellent book demonstrating that no one has the least idea of what constitutes “fascism” it does not mean we don’t know it when we see it. Right? Fight creeping American fascism with rampant American progressivism. That will fix it.

The Chairman needs to give everyone a little red book so we can study and recite the progressive mantra and have a roadmap to the future. I relish seeing conservatives out doing the jobs that poor illegal aliens are doing now. Boy! That would sure teach them. And, anyone who had some screwy idea about free market capitalism would look at them and choose the progressive life instead. Wow!

You know what? We need mass graves. When the progressives drop by and disappear someone from the family, it has an amazing ripple effect on the whole community. Cowering old white men will sweat with the relief of knowing that they missed the train ride one more time.

What a bunch of moronic rubbish. The FACTS are clear. Andrew Breitbart LIED about this woman and now, like a typical right-winger extremists, refuses to take responsibility for his lies. I personally hope Sharrod sues Breitbart for everything he’s worth. He is nothing but a smear artist, and all you lemming-like followers swallow his crap, then desperately try to justify it after the fact. Breitbart LIED. PERIOD. And you’re just compounding the lies by trying to defend his disgusting smear tactics.

And by the way, any gay person who supports right-wing causes is an idiot. You are voting against your own interests. The Republican Party platform says clearly that gay people deserve NO PARTERSHIP RIGHTS WHATSOEVER. They hate you, and like a pathetic Uncle Tom, you beg for more hatred from them. Disgusting. Totally disgusting.

And another Orwellian conservative media narrative closes the loop; Shirley Sherrod is a racist, Shirley Sherrod has always been a racist. And the chocolate ration goes up another 25%….

This is what’s most unbelievable about Bruce’s walk-back of his walk-back;

Are you f–ing kidding me?????? So Shirley is in the camp of — “If You Criticize Obama, You are a Racist”. Give me a bloody break.

I don’t know how what you universe you have to be living in to think that somebody just making sh*t up is considered criticism. That’s one of the dumbest things I’v’e read on the internet.

This all makes sense though. Part of being a conservative is never having to repent. Even when it looks and feels like you’ve made a complete fool of yourself by giving a platform to a completely fabricated racial smear, you just have to wait about a week for it to all blow over and the conservative myth-makers to begin rewriting history.

When the left finished their most recent revision of the rules for political discourse, I’m pretty sure they were confident that most people would just play along with the changes. Nuh-uh. Socialist movers and shakers here in America and abroad n…

“I don’t know how what you universe you have to be living in to think that somebody just making sh*t up is considered criticism. That’s one of the dumbest things I’v’e read on the internet.”

Ah, So Levi wasn’t criticising Fox when he was making stuff up about them waging a ceaseless campaign and working to get the woman fired by running news articles after she resigned. Good to know.

I guess he wasn’t criticising capitalism when he stated there are ‘many successful socialist countries’ or criticising religion when he stated that with a little more brain volume, an animal would be more intelligent.

So, Levi, let us try a little CONTEXT in tying your blockquote to what it was calling out, shall we?

SHIRLEY SHERROD, FMR. GEORGIA DIRECTOR, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, USDA: I don’t think he’s [Andrew Breitbart] interested in seeing anyone get past it, because I think he’d like to get us stuck back in the times of slavery. That’s where I think he’d like to see all black people end up again. And that’s why –

ANDERSON COOPER: You think he’s a racist?

SHERROD: — I think he’s so vicious. Yes, I do. And I think that’s why he’s so vicious against a black president.

To which Bruce notes:

Are you f–ing kidding me?????? So Shirley is in the camp of — “If You Criticize Obama, You are a Racist”. Give me a bloody break.

Please note: Shirley Sherrod says Andrew Breitbart wants blacks “stuck back in the times of slavery. That’s where I think he’d like to see all black people end up again.”

Sherrod drops a cherry on top of her racist rant with this: I think he’s so vicious. Yes, I do. And I think that’s why he’s so vicious against a black president.

Bruce comments: So Shirley is in the camp of — “If You Criticize Obama, You are a Racist”.

See how the CONTEXT thingie works?

I am particularly impressed with this bit of analysis from you:

I don’t know how what you universe you have to be living in to think that somebody just making sh*t up is considered criticism. That’s one of the dumbest things I’v’e read on the internet.

I can not quite ascertain who said what and where it was said and what it means in or out of CONTEXT. Being an ignorant religious nutcase, homophobe member of a laboratory for cultish behavior, perhaps I am too dense to appreciate your wisdom. But, with patience, perhaps I can learn. Could you explain your dumbest things on the internet blast?

Isn’t it funny to watch how the so-called “tolerant” Obama Party members viciously attack any minority member who doesn’t do exactly what they say as an “Uncle Tom” and “self-loathing”?

I mean, it’s funny. Hispanics, black Americans, Asians, gays and lesbians, and whatnot are supposedly diverse populations that do not adhere to a single mindset of any sort and have numerous members of different opinions, backgrounds, educations, and whatnot — but they all toe, absolutely believe, and must follow the Obama Party line, or they’re a traitor to their race/minority.

We can say that Sherrod’s hate rhetoric is part and parcel of the Obama Party mentality. If you are a minority, you may only think, act, and behave in one way — as an obedient plantation slave who does whatever the Obama Party tells you to do. If you dare disagree with the Obama Party massas, you are a traitor, self-loathing, stupid, etc. etc. etc.

It’s ironic that these leftists always invoke battered spouses — when they themselves are clearly attempting to abuse, batter, and intimidate other minority members into shutting up and doing what they’re told.

Guess what, “ukobserver” and “Kevin Little”? We found out that, not only do people not hate us out here, but that the food, the jobs, and the living are actually much better than your slave cabins and table scraps on the Obama Plantantion.

So all your whining and screaming is sour grapes. You are so pathetic that you would support a party that confiscates all of your property and wants control of your life right down to ordering you not to drink a sugared soda or to salt your food — because they claim they want to issue you a piece of paper.

First of all i just seen the CNN video of shirley sherrod!! If people look at the bigger picture that she was trying to say then you guys wouldnt be so judgemental about the speech! You guys sit on this computer making judgement. you want to judge shirley and Obama but they are trying to be a solution and you guys are the problem. I do think he owes her an apology because he took the speech way out of context on what the message was suppost to bring. she basically ststed it dosent matter about race!! and i dont like to bring out the racist card but for you to cut out the whole speech and make it negative. When it really was a positive speech then something is wrong with that picture.

Wow, we’ve a bumper crop of new posters. Welcome, if you’re going to stick around.

Ashley, if you’re referring to the original clip Bretibart aired, he accepted it wasn’t the complete tape (which the NAACP refused to release initially) but it was the complete tape he received. The subsequent full tape may not have been as damning, but her comments were.

Saying that airing a tape he received is the same as ‘wanting to go back to slavery’ is absurd. Saying that Andrew Breitbart is ‘vicious’ because the President is (half) black is absurd. Saying that her vile (or vial, if you’re with the NAACP) comments are allowed ‘because her father was killed by a white farmer’ is absurd. 6 million of my relatives were killed by Germans, the Divine knows how many were killed by Russians, Persians, Arabs, etc. So using Joan Walsh’s standard, how many hateful comments should I be allowed to make? Given the left’s pogrom against homosexuality in the past, shouldn’t Dan, Bruce et. al. be lauded for their conservative stance?

As to the initial speech being ‘positive’ it’s not. She realzied that it’s not ‘black against white’ it’s black and poor white against the rich. So it’s still baiting, just the same tired old class warfare trope over and over again.

This all makes sense though. Part of being a conservative liberal is never having to repent. Even when it looks and feels like you’ve made a complete fool of yourself by giving a platform to a completely fabricated racial smear, you just have to wait about a week for it to all blow over and the conservative liberal myth-makers to begin rewriting history.

My dear Levi, if you wish to stick your fingers in your ears, slam your eyes shut and make weird noises in order to drown out the world, you’re perfectly free to do so.

However, you’re certainly not entitled to fling poo at the walls in the heat of a petulant hissy fit.

You know when you need to think outside the box and realize, “Damn! Look what I’ve missed!” And change your opinion accordingly.

When a whole lot of people were throwing everything and the kitchen sink at Andrew Breitbart, I took it upon myself to see the forest from the trees. The picture that showed itself stank to the eye: the NAACP is filled with Marxists and race-mongers of the worst sort. Exactly the kind that Obama loves to promote and cultivate. Birds of a feather flock together. Then, the full tape of her came out. And then, her husband’s speech.

Those people, the Sherrods included, are NOT the people I came to watch and admire from “Eyes on the Prize”. Wait: I take it back! There is the “Black Power” part of the documentary. The Sherrods are addicted to “Black Power”, and have been for a long time. You can see the effects: it’s just like Gollum and The Ring.

It is sorrowful that the NAACP has transformed itself, from the organization that supported Thurgood Marshall’s case against “separate but equal” to just another race-mongering group among many. Where do they get their funding for this? Why didn’t anyone confront them for this awful turn of events?

It is interesting that it took Andrew Breitbart to show this to the world. He’s perfumed like a rose compared to all those who attacked him.

Lesson learned here: cameras (open, compact, Flip, hidden) are the Obama-nation’s worst enemies. They better watch what they say from now on: the next time they talk, someone can record them into oblivion.

The Pigford settlement looks a lot like hidden reparations to me… with so many that never even had a farm getting tons of taxpayer dollars.. for what??? That’s what the Obama administration doesn’t want us to examine… It could not be clearer that this was a case of reparations being paid out under the guise of helping black farmers…. unbelievable!

If you think continuing the slander of a person who dedicated her entire life to fighting racism is helpful to your cause, go for it say I. You’ll never learn the lessons of history. Continuing to attack Shirley Sharrod because she has the audacity to speak out in reaction to vile slanders which cost her her job and way of life, is really a fool’s errand. Women, and older women in particular, are not fooled by this tactic, and the GOP cannot afford to continue to give up ground to women and minorities. So by all means, keep stoking the white supremacists if you think that’s where the short-term money lies. We on the liberal side will enjoy the continued slow erosion over time of your influence and power, conservo-snots.

@Zorro: The Pigford case happened over 20 years ago. You’ve had all the time you need to complain about it up until now. The irony is that you required Shirley Sharrod to enlarge your brain, so in a sense you are carrying out her mission.

He didn’t hit the target, he made an indirect hit which flushed out the target from cover. While Breit was thinking more than one move ahead, everybody else was doing knee jerks and monday quarterbacking thinking they had wise judgment just cause they were one move ahead.

Why shouldn’t Sherrod hate Breitbart? The evil son of a bitch tried to ruin her life through dishonest and contemptible means. And why should you be so ready to condemn her over it anyway, you self hating, unbelievably neurotic and pathetic gay guy?

Brietbart proved once again with a brilliant act journalism how brainwashed by their victimhood, and racist most blacks are. If they were actually smart their would be more Michael Steeles, Alan Keyseses and Condilissa Rices and more than 2% would get the real news from the right channel.

Even though I find your lifestyle an abomination at least you vote correctly and you’re right about those people.

It’s amazing what a difference a week makes. One week, all over the news, folks on the left and the right working to make you a hero. Next week, your true colors (pardon the pun) come out and it turns out you’re nothing more than just another race-baiting leftie bent on changing America into Russia-lite.

So Shirley is in the camp of — “If You Criticize Obama, You are a Racist”.

Or maybe she’s in the “If Your Entire Goal In Life Is To Take Down The NAACP, So That You Will Go To Any Length To Achieve That Goal, Including Trying To Stir Up Racial Tension By Posting Out Of Context Videos And Pretending That They Prove Your Fear Of Black People Taking Over And Making Whitey Sorry, You Are A Racist” Camp.

Gay Republicans are like JEWS FOR HITLER. How ignorant and stupid do you have to be to align yourselves with those who would prefer that you all drop dead of AIDS? Shame on every one of you jerks — you are a disgrae to Mankind.

Like I have said many times before, those apologizing to Sherrod never listened to her entire speech. She never did really repent and her speech was filled with racist comments right up to the end of it. Her epiphany was half baked at best. She simply, and temporarily switched from race baiting to class baiting. The most telling part of her speech and never reported was this “It is not about blacks against whites, well it is, but is is also about rich versus poor.” She just double downed on her division-ary tactics. she did not learn from her racist behavior, she just branched out into other forms of division. Especially since after her so called revelation she went right back, in the exact same speech, into saying that if you oppose Obama health care it was because he was black, and that when republicans oppose Obama (on any subject) it is because he is black.

Gay Republicans are like JEWS FOR HITLER. How ignorant and stupid do you have to be to align yourselves with those who would prefer that you all drop dead of AIDS?

How ignorant and stupid do you have to be to vomit the same shit everybody else says?

so stop being shocked when the NAACP or its affiliates don’t live up to the Huxtable family facade.

Sorry. It’s a habit I picked it up in puhblik skrewl right before we were forced to sing “We Shall Overcome”.

Breitbart LIED. PERIOD. And you’re just compounding the lies by trying to defend his disgusting smear tactics.

Except they were her words. Contrary to what you’ve been taught by the KOSholes, using a liberal’s words to expose them is not a “smear”. It’s the God’s honest truth. See? I just demonstrated that you’re a retarded dumbass. That’s not a smear.

Gay Republicans are like JEWS FOR HITLER. How ignorant and stupid do you have to be to align yourselves with those who would prefer that you all drop dead of AIDS? Shame on every one of you jerks — you are a disgrae to Mankind.

Funny, I’ve never had a Republican or conservative express to me that they want me to drop dead of AIDS.

But I have liberals like you, Kelly Hamilton, screaming and yelling at me all the time that I am a Hitler supporter, a jerk, ignorant, stupid, and a disgrace to mankind.

So let’s see: I can align myself with people with whom I agree politically and aren’t abusive, or I can align myself with people with whom I don’t agree politically and who ARE abusive. Like you.

When one reads through the hate language of gays and lesbians like Kelly Hamilton, you figure out very quickly that the gay community’s intellectual solidarity comes more from the bullying of bigots like Kelly Hamilton than it does any degree of intelligent thought.

I mean Pat is an example of someone on the other side of the aisle (as it were) who is more than willing to have a civil discussion. I don’t agree with Pat on a lot of things, but I respect him.

These new crop o’trolls don’t have anything to offer but the same old tired insults. They like to pretend that President W Bush didn’t increase AIDs funding, or that Reagan ignored the issue entirely. They like to pretend that DADT and DOMA were the efforts of those ‘Wasclally Wepublicans’, and not the party they kiss the ring of. They honestly think the party of the Klan, the party who’s ‘conscience of the Senate’ was the man who filibustered civil rights, likes them for anything more than their paychecks and their votes.
A party who’s former vice presidential candidate stood against the holy grail of same sex marriage, while the former Republican VP, who campaigned with his lesbian daughter, has said it is up to the people.

Fox Nation had the story at 1:43 p.m. but it didn’t break big until Drudge linked to … a CBS story at around 4:30 p.m., 48 minutes before FoxNews.com reportedly published anything. Two points, though. First, didn’t Sherrod say she was told that one of the reasons she had to resign was because she was “going to be on Glenn Beck tonight” (which she wasn’t)? That suggests that the gears were turning to push her out before Beck hit the airwaves at 5 p.m. ET … which was also 18 minutes before FoxNews.com published anything. You have to read waaay down into the Politico article to be reminded of that. Second, as Johnny Dollar noted in replying to Media Matters, if you look at the comments to the original FoxNews.com article, the first one doesn’t appear until 6:22 p.m., more than an hour after Politico claims the article first went live. Er, how can that be? Wouldn’t there have been 64 minutes of comments in there if Politico’s timeline is correct?

People like Andrew Breitbart represent the single biggest threat to the Left, because he is an ex-liberal turned conservatibe who understands the liberal mindset better than a life long conservative with a conservative background. Breitbart was actually a campaign worker for the Democrats at one time.`

Does Shirley Sherrod really believe that Breitbart became a conservative because he discovered his inner racist? Michelle Bachmann was also an ex-liberal. So many baby boomers and GenX’ers grew up being taught to believe that liberalism was the norm. Now more and more of these people are rejecting liberalism and embracing conservatism.

This does not compute in the minds of liberals. Their concept of conservatism is that all conservatives come from conservative backgrounds. The idea of someone coming from a liberal background and rejecting liberalism is something that people like Shirely Sherrod can’t comprehend.

oh please, Andrew Brietbart is a failed drunken christian who has taken it up the ass by some father figure in the sewer you slime call a church and his little anus hurts weely bad and that is what yall have in common . Meanwhile I’m yawning. What else is new?

Andrew Brietbart is a failed drunken christian who has taken it up the ass by some father figure in the sewer you slime call a church and his little anus hurts weely bad and that is what yall have in common

How nice of Barack Obama to join us personally.

Really, though, scooter is doing us a favor by showing us how all Obama supporters talk, what all Obama supporters believe, and how the Obama Party views anyone who disagrees with them.

You people are real winners. I suggest you leave that woman and her family alone. Not so brite bart doesn’t need your help. His fate is cast. His credibility is shot to hell. There is nothing you can say or do to the Sherrod’s that will help him get it back. He is toast.

As for your apology, you didn’t mean it. So no one really cares about you withdrawing it. IOW blow it out of your behind.

So by all means, keep stoking the white supremacists if you think that’s where the short-term money lies.

Ehh, these dumb, conservative opportunists…they would trash their own grandmother in a post, if they thought it would make the GOP gaybaiters they are trying to impress look twice at them without putting them in an ambulance from a gay bashing.

I see it really burns your ass that folk stand up to white supremacy when they see it. That’s what we disagree with. And for the record: you are not now nor ever were the master race. You show yourselves for what you really are with every word that spew forth from your bony fingers.

But please keep up the yeoman’s work that you have been doing. You are going to make massive numbers show up in November. And you know as well as I do, the only time deceptiCons win is when turnout is low.

oh please, Andrew Brietbart is a failed drunken christian who has taken it up the ass by some father figure in the sewer you slime call a church and his little anus hurts weely bad and that is what yall have in common .

You don’t have to hide by using other people’s names. Is this what happened to you that makes you so angry and full of hate? Seriously, you can talk to us. We’ll listen.

Andrew Breitbart didn’t ‘try to ruin her life’ he ran a clip of a tape. the NAA(L)CP tried to ruin her life, condemning her even though they had the full, unedited tape.

The Administration tried to ruin her life, forcing her to resign because of their fears of what a network might do.

Andrew Breitbart used the free press and free speech to show a tape, unaltered, that he received. It doesn’t change that she lies about him ‘wanting to go back to the days of slavery’ or that her husband makes racist comments on the record.

In fact JR, Andrew Breitbart was more honest than you, since he didn’t put words in her mouth, lie, or accuse large groups of racism just the ones in the unaltered video he received.

You are entitled to your own opinion, small minded as it is. You are not entitled to your own facts..

So, Levi, let us try a little CONTEXT in tying your blockquote to what it was calling out, shall we?

Nice try, but no.

I was specifically referring to Bruce describing Breitbart’s actions as “criticism of Obama.” Regardless of what Sherrod said about Breitbart and to what extent he is a racist, it is absolutely insane to suggest that what Breitbart did could be called criticism. If I just made up some random garbage about you, as in; “Heliotrope likes to rob banks and kick puppies,” would you consider that criticism? We’ll add that to the growing list of words which Republicans are only pretending to know the definition of. This is the only point I was making, and all of your babbling about me ignoring the context is irrelevant.

Now, if you’d like me to speak specifically to her comments, I can do that if you’d like. It certainly appears to me that Andrew Breitbart is a racist, based not only on his actions in this scandal but during the ACORN affair as well. As I’ve pointed out before, I think that most of the racism in the Republican party is borne of opportunism and electoral necessity and not so much hatred, but that’s still racism. Do I think Breitbart wants to return blacks to slavery? I couldn’t say, but I’ll assume that he doesn’t. Is Sherrod over the line with what she said? I don’t think so. I think her anger is understandable given what’s been done to her and I’m not even going to pretend to know what life is like for a black woman whose father was killed by racists.

In the real world, Sherrod is the victim here, always and forever, no matter how you mis-characterize Breitbart’s role in this thing. She was deliberately targeted because she was black, was fired from her job, and her personal life is now a sideshow for the media… But oh! She shouldn’t get too angry!! Would you criticize a rape victim for expressing a desire that her attacker is raped in prison? Would you condemn the family of a murder victim for wanting to kill the murderer? Victims are prone to hyperbole, and its basic human decency to let them vent.

Or, you know, you could pretend that she’s not a victim at all and pretend that Andrew Breitbart is some kind of hero to your cause. Depending on how intellectually dishonest you’re feeling.

And while you’re all pretending that Sherrod is a racist, I suppose that it’s time to start praising the Obama administration for firing her as quickly as they did, right? This should be an important part of the discussion here.

But Levi, accoding to you, Fox news conspired to have her fired by playing the tape after she was fired. So are you saying that you agree that Fox news is not racist?

Oh wait, I forgot, to Levi Logic, Fox news is racist for airing the tape after she was fired in a conspiracy to get her fired, but the NAACP (who had the complete tape) and the administration are not racist for actually firing her.

Again, for those of us who exist in Linear time, you’re making no sense in your desperate attempt to project your racism on others.

Let us not forget, Levi doesn’t think brown people can handle democracy. Maybe that’s why he’s so conflicted over this mess? Maybe he thinks that the media is unfair to Sherrod and President Obama because he thinks brown people can’t handle media either?

Let us remember, by his own admission he’s to the left of the socialists, since Obama had to ‘gut his policies’ to get them through a democratically held congress. Of course when asked to back up his vitrol, he can’t. Facts are a foreign topic to Levi, like honesty.

First, I like the way The Anchoress puts it: Are the Sherrods race-baiters? It is an oblique step from asking if they are racists, but it is easier to debate.

Second, at about #90 above, a swarm of nasty liberal bile spitters show up. We all know that sliming is lowest level of “discourse” and is the dullest knife in the set. I suppose some link somewhere stirred these folks up and they came here to display their “talents.”

To wit:

#90 So by all means, keep stoking the white supremacists if you think that’s where the short-term money lies. We on the liberal side will enjoy the continued slow erosion over time of your influence and power, conservo-snots.

Comment by TR_Ucknuttz

Love advice on how to be a better opposition.

#95 LOL! You knuckle dragging neanderthal moron teabaggers are a hoot. Don’t ever change. You are keeping a lot of comedy writers employed!

Comment by Fred

*Comment below.

#98 Why shouldn’t Sherrod hate Breitbart? The evil son of a bitch tried to ruin her life through dishonest and contemptible means. And why should you be so ready to condemn her over it anyway, you self hating, unbelievably neurotic and pathetic gay guy?

Comment by Matt

Unsolicited psychoanalysis is always worth less than the price paid.

#99 Brietbart proved once again with a brilliant act journalism how brainwashed by their victimhood, and racist most blacks are. If they were actually smart their would be more Michael Steeles, Alan Keyseses and Condilissa Rices and more than 2% would get the real news from the right channel.

Even though I find your lifestyle an abomination at least you vote correctly and you’re right about those people.

Comment by Bruce Hoby

How exceedingly clever. Post what you think a knuckle dragging Neanderthal moron would post in order to contaminate the comments. Only liberals can dream up this type of Journolist tactic.

#101 So Shirley is in the camp of — “If You Criticize Obama, You are a Racist”.

Or maybe she’s in the “If Your Entire Goal In Life Is To Take Down The NAACP, So That You Will Go To Any Length To Achieve That Goal, Including Trying To Stir Up Racial Tension By Posting Out Of Context Videos And Pretending That They Prove Your Fear Of Black People Taking Over And Making Whitey Sorry, You Are A Racist” Camp.

Comment by Ann

Love those Capital Letters. They Really Tell Me How Really, Really Angry You Are and How You Think We Are All Dirty Birdies.

#103 Gay Republicans are like JEWS FOR HITLER. How ignorant and stupid do you have to be to align yourselves with those who would prefer that you all drop dead of AIDS? Shame on every one of you jerks — you are a disgrae to Mankind.

Comment by Kelly Hamilton

My comments of this at #112.

#115 oh please, Andrew Brietbart is a failed drunken christian who has taken it up the ass by some father figure in the sewer you slime call a church and his little anus hurts weely bad and that is what yall have in common . Meanwhile I’m yawning. What else is new?

Comment by scooter

I love the failed drunken christian theme. It fulfills every dream a lib-bigot ever had. Then, scooter, comes on like a knuckle dragging Neanderthal moron attacking gays for sodomy. Clever. (I had a dog that dragged his bottom across the carpet when his rear portal itched. We called him “Scooter.” Just saying….)

*My prize goes to Fred. “Knuckle dragging neanderthal moron teabaggers” is so very compact, unoriginal and expected that it stands out as the most brilliant contribution.

Levi, no matter what you say, you compulsively lard it with hyperbole that puts you beyond mere exaggeration —

it is absolutely insane to suggest that what Breitbart did could be called criticism.

If I suggest that what Breitbart did is “criticism” that makes me “absolutely insane.” You have erected an amazing iron curtain here. Naturally, I would not accept your analysis of my sanity, but, more importantly, you are walling yourself off from criticism. I do not see the difference between what you have written and slapping your hands over your ears and chanting: “I can’t hear you.”

Ergo, I have no opening, by your rules for debating with you. Why do you consistently do this? You have a compulsion for saying things are “absolute” and “ironclad” and “abject” and other such superlatives.

Try coming back with thoughtful discourse. If there are varying points of view, you should at least be open to hearing them and debating them with no holds barred.

What you are consistently doing is issuing proclamations. Ironically, if you want to spend time with a large aggregation of proclamation givers, you should visit a mental institution.

*Yawn*here“Fox News and the rest of the conservative movement would like to portray as some kind of Black Panther intent on getting revenge on the white man. They do this by attempting to destroy black people that have some kind of connection to Obama, usually by directing the full force of their news network into either making something out of nothing and applying double standards (as in Rev. Wright), or by flat out making sh*t up (Sherrod).”

or here“I don’t know how you explain away the actions of Breitbart and right wing media outlets otherwise. They tried to destroy a completely benign black woman in order to slander the black President”

“a black woman getting fired for <bno reason because of the concerted efforts of racist, right-wing media organizations. Do you think they would tell you that I’m a bigger problem than Fox News and Andrew Breitbart?” link

And again from my link the story was aired after she ‘resigned. So they ‘attempted to apply the full force of their news network’ to make her resign after she resigned.

Oh look what I did there, Levi. Your own words, with these neat things called hyperlinks. You can take your self admitted socialist leanings and try to emulate your idol Gobbels and repeat the big lie all you want. You’re not ‘dragging us kicking and screaming’ into your future.

If I suggest that what Breitbart did is “criticism” that makes me “absolutely insane.” You have erected an amazing iron curtain here. Naturally, I would not accept your analysis of my sanity, but, more importantly, you are walling yourself off from criticism. I do not see the difference between what you have written and slapping your hands over your ears and chanting: “I can’t hear you.”

Ergo, I have no opening, by your rules for debating with you. Why do you consistently do this? You have a compulsion for saying things are “absolute” and “ironclad” and “abject” and other such superlatives.

Try coming back with thoughtful discourse. If there are varying points of view, you should at least be open to hearing them and debating them with no holds barred.

What you are consistently doing is issuing proclamations. Ironically, if you want to spend time with a large aggregation of proclamation givers, you should visit a mental institution.

Okay heliotrope, I don’t know what you want from me. I hate the kind of semantic arguments that you’re trying to drag me into, you’re not the first conservative to do. If you don’t like my writing style or my word choice then I can’t help you. Playing stupid and pretending that words like ironclad and insanity have singular, rigid meanings and that you are some kind of definition arbiter is not impressive.

If you’d like to get back to talking about the issue, feel free to substitute ‘utter stupidity’ in the place of ‘absolute insanity’ in the comment that has so offended your sense of vocabulary.

Aslo note how he changes the terms again (and I fell for it for a moment) I say that his rancid lies are that “Fox conspired to have her fired.” Levi tries to change it, since he’s caught in his quotes to ‘forced her to resign.’

Guess what Levi. The Administration forced her to resign, because of their irrational fear of one man. You have said over and over, Fox conspired to destroy her. I was kind enough to limit it to ‘fired.’

Yes… because wanting to ‘destroy’ someone includes letting them keep their job.

Levi, do you ever get motion sickness from spinning so hard?

Ah, I think you’re starting to figure out. You’re trying to pretend that my vague assertion (Fox wanted to destroy Sherrod) was actually a specific claim (Fox made Sherrod resign.) This is the last resort of people that are terrible at debate, though actually, in this situation it is your first resort. I meant what I said, my meaning was clear, I’ve clarified it numerous times, I’ve attempted to correct your misunderstanding of my statement…. and you’re still at it, because it’s all you’ve got. The problem I run into with people like you is not that you’re incapable of understanding or I’m incapable of making myself clear – you simply refuse to understand and choose to fight with a fabricated version of my argument.

Let me recap; I’ve never blamed Fox News for Sherrod’s firing. I have blamed the administration, which is 100% at fault in my opinion. The case I have been making is that Fox News is racist and that it has no journalistic credibility. Neither of those claims require me to prove that Fox News made her resign, that’s always been a construct of yours to squelch discussion and avoid the topic.

Aslo note how he changes the terms again (and I fell for it for a moment) I say that his rancid lies are that “Fox conspired to have her fired.” Levi tries to change it, since he’s caught in his quotes to ‘forced her to resign.’

Actually, your initial mischaracterization in the other thread was that I’d said ‘Fox News made her resign.’ Go dig it up, and then you can tell me who is changing the terms.

Guess what Levi. The Administration forced her to resign, because of their irrational fear of one man. You have said over and over, Fox conspired to destroy her. I was kind enough to limit it to ‘fired.’

See? This is exactly what I’m talking about above. You think it’s your prerogative to limit the meaning of my words for no other reason than it benefits your argument. Further, you think that this putting of words into my mouth is a ‘kind’ gesture. Are you even capable of grasping what you’re admitting to here?

He can’t. All he cann do is prattle on that this massive conspiracy to destroy this woman is engineered by an evil organization that is soooo evil, that they didn’t report it until after she was resigned.

Bu hey, we’re making progress. Note how he’s not contesting his own racisim and socialist beliefs any longer.

As an overseas observer on US politics for the last 10 years l cannot help but be amazed how self deluded American Right wingers who are minorities are.

You sit there and prostitute yourselves for a party who feel no shame in demonizing you, your friends and your loved ones an like battered spouses you defend them to the hilt in a vain idea that some of their money, and it comes down to money, will filter to you, which is why you support the false notion of trickle down economics.

I thought I’d comment on this. The problem is the Democratic Party is not any better then Republicans on treating minorities well. The truth is that anyone can succeed in life, *if they believe they can and work hard enough*, and I have a lot of family experience in what the Democrat’s policies do to poor people (so don’t tell me they are any better or they don’t encourage people to be poor).

Besides, the discrimination I’ve suffered from Democratic policies far, far outweights republican ones (or do you genuinely believe Democrats support minorities for any other reason then simply grabbing power?). Opposition to charter schools and school vouchers was one biggy (it screws the invisibly disabled), the Employee Free Choice act is another (if you think taking away secret ballots is at all acceptable, tell that to the 20% of us with the “highly sensitive personality type”, have trouble saying no, and tend to be sensitive to those bigger then us–or did you think only women suffer from that?).

In the end, Republicans preach a philosophy that make their own bigotry hypocritical, and I’ve watched many, many of them realize this and change. On the other hand, the Democratic philosophy is more openly corrupt, traps people I care about in poverty, tells them they can’t succeed (human beings can overcome an incredible amount of adversity), insists on toeing a party line and this ridiculous “solidarity” concept (collectivism always screws some minorities; it’s the nature of populism), etc.

Would you criticize a rape victim for expressing a desire that her attacker is raped in prison? Would you condemn the family of a murder victim for wanting to kill the murderer?

And now out comes the moral relativist.

First, Levi is arguing that Sherrod should be allowed to hate and discriminate against all white people because the person who allegedly killed her father was white.

Second, in Levi’s hypothetical scenario, desiring and wanting are not the same as doing. If the rape victim pays someone to rape her attacker in prison, if the family of the murdered hunts down and kills the murderer, that is a different matter entirely.

And that is exactly what Sherrod did. She generalized what happened to her father to all white people, and she acted to discriminate against them.

By that pathetic Levi logic, someone who is mugged by a black person is not only justified in hating all black people and holding them responsible, but also using whatever power they have to discriminate against black people.

Sherrod must truly be an inferior human being for you to hold her to such a pathetically low standard. And that is why you are a racist, Levi; you refuse to hold Sherrod accountable for her behavior because of her skin color.

I see it really burns your ass that folk stand up to white supremacy when they see it. That’s what we disagree with. And for the record: you are not now nor ever were the master race. You show yourselves for what you really are with every word that spew forth from your bony fingers.

Sounds like someone’s got a real problem with white people. That’s typical; Barack Obama himself supports and demands that school children be taught ludicrously racist theories, including this:

Carruthers is a defender of Leonard Jeffries, professor in the department of black studies at City College in Harlem, infamous for his black supremacist and anti-Semitic views. Jeffries sees whites as oppressive and violent “ice people,” in contrast to peaceful and mutually supportive black “sun people.” The divergence says Jeffries, is attributable to differing levels of melanin in the skin.

So when you have defenders of Barack Obama who insist that personality traits are based on skin color, I think it’s pretty clear who the actual racists are. Sherrod is a racist. You are a racist.

Fox News does deserve some degree of blame, because without a massive media organization to mindlessly parrot these kinds of ridiculous attacks, people like Breitbart wouldn’t have the back-up they need to even attempt the con. Fox News creates the environment where this kind of opportunistic racism is expresssed.

As expected, you’re going to be a whiny little child and continue to dodge responding to me. I don’t suppose it would matter, but just know that I have absolutely no faith in you to respond. Your type always attaches these little disclaimers to their comments so that you can excuse yourself from arguing and pretend like it’s my fault.