That does not make sense. There are other ways to keep track of those records - like registration of the car itself. They can keep an index of everyone from Vital Statistics and do it that way (for example). No, the reasons for requiring a driver's license is to ensure that drivers have basic training in operating a vehicle.

Not to say I agree with treating cars and guns in exactly the same way. They are different things, and should be treated differently.

Do you keep a vehicle for your entire life? Your DL is yours for life and as such is the only way for insurance Co's to know when you screw up.

That will go absolutely nowhere, and would be (properly) found unconstitutional.

Besides, it makes no sense. Sell them to whom? Canadians and Mexicans? Other nations' citizens? Given the only other countries they could really go to (third-world dictatorships), they're better off in our hands.

RIIIIIGHT.....All cops everywhere in the United States are just like the 4 chicken-shit Sheriff's Deputies in Broward County, Florida, every single one of them.
Yep, sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

Perhaps only the (democrat) weasel Broward sheriff has chicken shit deputies, but no matter where you go, when seconds count the police are minutes away. If you prefer being unable to defend yourself, that's your business. But if you propose making other people unable to defend themselves... luckily that's none of your damn business.

No one I've read on PH is advocating taking our guns away.
That's an NRA distraction aimed at increasing sales.

That's not 100% true. But, it's not really what I am most concerned about... I have more attention on pointless rules that don't reduce crime, but just slice away at gun owners, making it too expensive, too troublesome, too time consuming, etc... to own/use guns.