Offices of The National Trust of Victoria

Built in 1878 for George Nipper

Designed by Architect Charles Webb

Tasma Terrace

The headquarters of the National Trust (Victoria), Tasma Terrace has a gift shop and features regular exhibitions and other events throughout the year.

One of the finest examples of a nineteenth century three storey terrace house in Australia, ‘Tasma Terrace’ was built in 1879 for wealthy grain merchant George Nipper as a stylish guest house and family home. Facing demolition and replacement with hi-rise towers in 1970, the unique building was saved through the advocacy of the National Trust.

Retail Shop, Gallery and Meeting Rooms

Tasma Terrace now houses the National Trust’s Victorian offices, a gallery space, period decorated rooms and meeting rooms. Tasma Terrace is available as a venue for hire for functions, conferences and meetings.

"The blend of elaborated stucco and cast iron which is so splendidly combined in Australian terraces is absolutely unknown elsewhere. 'Tasma Terrace' is a particularly fine example of its type."

English architect Ian Grant's UNESCO report on preservation in Australia

Spared from the wreckers!

On 6 March, 1973, Victorian Premier Rupert Hamer announced a Cabinet decision to give Tasma Terrace to the National Trust (Victoria) as a new headquarters.
"The Age" Newspaper that day reported the halt to plans for demolition of the 87 year old building to make way for a multi story complex of government offices.

Renovations to Tasma and other Trust properties were assisted by a Federal Government grant of $182, 900 in 1974. Minister for Urban and Regional Development Tom Uren and National Trust Chairman Rodney Davidson announce the news outside Tasma Terrace on 17 April, 1974.

Architects Bates Smart and McCutcheon worked on a partly honorary basis on the restoration of Tasma Terrace.

The renovations attracted wide interest, particularly the preservation of the elaborate iron work.

"The architects have spent considerable energy on an accurate restoration, wrote architect Norman Day in 1977, "even to scraping back the iron lace to discover the original colours. In fact, a glorious result of the project has been the unexpected grouping of abnormal colours which together provides a delightful break from the trendy chocolates (and worse) that many repainted terraces sport."

Tragedy At Parliament Place - read about a sad episode in the history of Tasma Terrace

WARNING - This content is not suitable for very young students. Teachers please use with discretion.

Constable William Harley was walking his beat in the vicinity of the public offices behind Parliament House on the night of 14th August 1890. It was late winter - overcast – becoming windier as the evening continued. All had been quiet on this Thursday evening until at 11.10 pm he met Mr Wright on the street. Wright was a barrister residing at Parliament Place. He had rushed to fetch Dr. Charles Ryan and was returning with him. A woman had been shot at the lodging house.

The police officer made his way past Treasury to the southern terrace recently re- named Marlborough House by the new proprietress. Constable Harley testified that he ran up the stairs to the front door and into the hall where he saw Mr. Alfred Turner, thence past the dining room, into the bedroom at the rear of the building on the ground floor. There he found a woman’s body supine, her left arm outstretched and a gun nestled on the fingers of her hand. The room was tidy with only slight evidence of a struggle, the pillows were disarranged and the bedclothes turned down as if the woman was about to retire to bed. She was clothed in a dressing gown unbuttoned to reveal a night dress, her slippers still on her feet, and the left side of her body was soaked in blood.

Hand-written in tight copperplate, the coroner’s report describes how the blood was ‘splashed’ and the carpet ‘covered’. Scorch marks were present on one hand, with traces of a black substance - gunpowder. Her right hand was lying across her stomach unblemished but splattered with a few spots of blood. The left hand side of her face was swollen and a bullet hole was visible beneath the outer angle of the left eye, a second wound was visible near the left ear. The first bullet fractured the woman’s upper jaw; the second was fatal.

Why did Edith Jane Forrester Jubb - business woman, lodging house operator, ex-pub licensee, mother of three, former actress and alleged adulteress - die? Melbourne newspaper, The Argus, reporting on the tragedy the following day, named it an "Attempted Murder and Suicide".

When a loud noise disturbed Mr D Wright he was sitting in his upstairs room. Thinking it was ‘someone violently kicking the back gate’ he ignored the sound for a few seconds before being startled by cries for help and the sound of rushing feet in the corridors. He opened his door to find Alfred Turner partly in the passage. Turner, with a slight graze like wound on his forehead, began to explain that Mrs Jubb attempted to shoot him and then shot herself. Three bullets in total were fired from a revolver belonging to Alfred Turner.

Dr. Youl, the City Coroner, opened the inquest at 12:00 pm on Saturday the 16th of August in the dining room of the deceased, at Parliament Place. The body was identified and the hearing was postponed till the following Thursday. The evidence presented led to Alfred Turner’s sentence to trial for wilful murder. The coronial evidence showed that Edith Jubb died in approximately 2 minutes from gun shot wounds to the left hand side of the head, the second shot piercing the pharynx. She died from both asphyxiation and blood loss.

One bullet strayed and hit the wall dislodging plaster which injured Turner superficially. The ‘old fashioned’ revolver owned by Alfred Turner required re-cocking between shots. In fact, it was found to be cocked when Constable Harley picked the firearm up when he arrived on the scene. The question that puzzled the court was could Edith have shot herself twice in the head using her left hand and did she have the strength to re-cock the pistol after each shot? Dr. G A Syme, who performed the autopsy, said that this was possible.

There was an immediate assumption of suicide, but witnesses, including her daughter Fanny, stated that Edith was right handed, with an intense horror of firearms.

In the Public records Office Victoria records, court transcripts and documents relating to the prosecution survive, the defence papers do not. The evidence presented by a number of witnesses who knew the couple all tell a sad story of abuse and violence. Fanny Jubb, Edith’s 15 year old daughter witnessed Turner violently mistreating her mother and threatening her with the same gun by which she died. He was repeatedly heard to say that he would shoot her. Edith had removed the gun from Alfred’s rooms for her protection.

From the transcripts in "The Argus" the defence’s case seemed to centre on a character assassination of Edith, presenting her as an immoral and jealous woman. The judge on the case was Sir Hartley Williams. Indeed Justice Williams in his summation comments that ‘He was grieved, pained, and somewhat shocked to hear great stress laid on the allegation that the deceased was a woman who drank and was of an abandoned character... They were told that the prisoner had a very strong affection for the woman, and he (his honour) was sorry that the prisoner’s counsel should have thought it necessary to make those observations.’ "The Age", 19 September 1890

The fact that the couple had not recently argued violently, although some coolness in manner had been observed, was offered to show that the situation had improved between the couple since residing in Parliament Place. The defence blamed Alfred’s previous aggressive behaviour on financial stresses whilst the couple were living in less salubrious and respectable circumstances. Once they had again been raised to their place in society cordial relations were apparently resumed. Justice Williams was also incredulous that Turner could be so callous as to coolly place the gun in Edith’s dying hand and premeditate his story of events. It seemed easier for the jury to believe that Edith was a hysterical woman bent on murder and suicide than Alfred as a cruel and brutal man.

After deliberating for 45 minutes, the all male jury found Alfred Turner not guilty.