Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: LA ORG WOMEN
Message-ID: <9511180758.0B7FV00@support.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 95 07:58:38 -0800
Lines: 88
rogue@ccs.neu.edu (R Agent)
Diane Richardson wrote:
>I don't believe you're anything but what you claim to be, Wolf -- a
>former Scientologist who still has a good relationship with the
>"Church" .
>I believe, however, that unaffiliated ex-Scientologists[tm] in good
>standing with the "Church" are in a very good position to be
>asked by OSA to get into "comm" with a.r.s. critics to learn more
>about the critics and to funnel information back to OSA. I would be
>no more surprised to see declarations signed by you than I was to see
>them signed by Kim Baker.
Rogue:
>This is a fair statement. Whether Wolf is curerently "in comm" with OSA,
>if they should decide Wolf would make a useful asset I'm sure they'd have
>little difficulty acquiring him. Sorry, Wolf.
Easiest thing in the world for OSA to contact known
scieno.netters and ask them to "help out". One way to check
the loyalty of those who might otherwise drift away. Or to
get them back into good standing/graces with the top
sci-nazis.
They practice the conspiracy they accuse us of. You can tell
by looking at how they accuse arserws of conspiring. It fits
the pre-programmed thought process that Issued directly from El
Rotundo's Orifice. "One accuses others of what he is
actually doing."
It's hard-wired into their think.
Diane:
>Others may choose to agree or disagree with my assessment. I have no
>influence or power over the opinions of others here. I merely state
>my own opinion. It appears that Scientologists[tm] and
>ex-Scientologists[tm] alike have difficulty realizing that it's
>possible for critics to disagree (even sharply at times) and yet still
>remain friends. I guess that has a lot to do with the ARC
>indoctrination -- a faulty piece of tech if I've ever seen one.
Toad'l Clockwork Orange. Making mechanical something as
organic as love.
Rogue:
>Spot on. You & I pretty clearly don't see eye to eye on a number of
>issues, including Mr. Tripp. :) But that doesn't stop me from seeing that
>your research is second to none, and appreciating your keen eye for detail
>in peoples' statements. I greatly value what you contribute here.
Our Steamrollin' Librarian is clearly one of the newsgroup's
greatest assets. So she gets crabby sometimes. Who doesn't?
ars would seem kinda empty if Diane decided she'd taken
enough insults and walked away.
S'give a hand, folks.
>>>Rogue Agent
>>> Wolf, credibility doesn't come cheap around here. You gotta put in the
>>> time and then buy it by proving your trustworthiness with some brave but
>>> stupid act that gets the church pissed at you. For now you just have to
>>> wear the "OSA plant" sticker on your shirt and stop trying to peel it off.
>>> When the time comes it'll come off on its own.
>
>Rogue, I would suggest that Wolf would achieve a greater amount of
>credibility around here if he were more direct about his own beliefs
>about Scientology[tm] and more honest about his motives for posting
>here.
>
>Yes, I agree. Wolf does have some motives he's being less than up front
>about. He's not been totally disingenuous, but there's some things he
>could be more open about.
His last post about the cult finally telling the silly story
that constitutes their Holy Droppings is the most revealing
of any to date in explaining to me what he's doing. He's
now here to establish a fall-back position for the sci-nazis.
You betcha.
+--------------------------------------+
Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *
dennis.l.erlich@support.com + inForm@primenet.com
"tar baby"