How tall is Daniel Cudmore

Daniel Cudmore's Height

6ft 6.5in (199 cm)

Canadian Actor best known for playing Colossus in X2 and X-Men: The Last Stand. He has also appeared in The Twilight Saga as Felix. He said in a 4tnz.com interview "I'm 6' 7". We met him at Massive Events Twilight Event in 2011. At that event when the host described him as being 6ft 8, he replied, "Actually, I'm not even that tall". In our shot I had a 1 inch shoe, daniel/jenny had 0.6 inch converse sneakers. In 2015, on twitter he now stated "Last time I had a physical I was measured at 6'6 1/2"

5ft 8 Rob, 5ft 8 Jenny and Daniel

You May Be Interested

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (22 Votes)6ft 6.59in

berta said on 7/Dec/16
i think he is a guy that would like to be 4 cm shorter than he is. he is in that range that his height it little to tall. i can beleive him being measuresd to 199 and was standing with loose posture and if he really stetch up he is 200-200,5 cm

Leonardo 1.73m said on 30/Nov/16
Hi Rob, he should be the first guy listed two meters tall because he is that, that mark (200cm) sounds very cool for all the world (except UK/US because you use inches)

Nik said on 11/Nov/16
@Ian jiao

Yes I agree. To be honest anyone 6'5" or more would get my attention in a shopping mall. I would be respectful though and not make it noticeable and I am sure you would do the same.

@James

Yes 6'7" (and 6'6") is more than just very tall. It's the start of the giant range for me. Anyone who is 6'6" looks very very tall compared to most people. It's rare enough and standout enough to deserve the giants tag.

Nik said on 11/Nov/16
I would say a man of 6'6" is at the bottom end of being a giant for me. People of 6'6" look that much taller than most people so I don't see why they shouldn't be labelled as giants or giantesses.

shiva 181 cms said on 28/Oct/16
This guy could be upgraded to 6'6.75 he doesn't look anything less than this listing he could've measured 6'6.5 range and got with that claim

S.J.H said on 19/Oct/16
@berta said on 10/Oct/16

I feel that too. He might be 200cm and change in anyday. 199cm absolute lowest

berta said on 10/Oct/16
could be a wrong measurement the guy look 2 meter easy. 199 is the absolute lowest possibly.201 was maybe little to mutch i think exactly 2 meter is fair. he is in that height range where i think many guys rather say they are a little shorter than they are than taller. exept if they are wrestlers :P

TJE said on 3/Oct/16
Nah, he's under the 6'6 mark on the chart, but he could stander a little better and has 0.4 inch less footwear. 6'6.25 is more likely.

S.J.H said on 26/Sep/16
I would honestly say most 6'7 listing guy in this site doesn't look taller than cudmore out of this picture here

shiva 181 cms said on 24/Sep/16
Daniel cudmore's height is (6'6.75) he might have measured 6'6.5 at night at his lowest he might be 6'8 out of bed comfortably granted his height he might lose 1'+

Brandon said on 18/Sep/16
6'5.5" judging by the scale+0.4" and you get basically 6'6" flat. To be honest though this new height scale is never accurate, everyone always looks 1-2 inches shorter on the scaled picture than their listed height.

Mark said on 15/Sep/16
He had a disadvantage footwear here, so Cudmore easily clears 6'7" without question in the morning.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Sep/16
The chances of this guy hitting 6ft6 flat or less are impossible. I still think he could be brushing 6ft8 first thing

James B said on 8/Aug/16
To be fair to Glenn 6'6.5 isn't that much taller than 6ft5

184guy said on 22/Jul/16
Haha in the pic he really looks closer to 6'5 than 6'6 counting the lines but this is not precise and it's just a indicator
In the X-Men he had about 5in on Hugh Jackman, however

184guy said on 21/Jul/16
Rob,how much taller Daniel looked than AJ In person and counting the footwear ?
They look excaclty the same.6ft reachs the lower middle of 'em noses

Editor Rob: Cudmore really looked taller and that's before considering the swing in footwear, which is why I believe Cudmore wasn't at his lowest mark.

Joshua might dip under 6ft 6 a little fraction.

the funniest thing I ever read though was Big G thinking Cudmore was 6ft 5...that's why I don't guess on streets ;)

Canson said on 16/Jul/16
we can't always use the standard "below the chin" as 9". Cudmore does have sort of a long face typical for a 6'6 guy or above (look at Ali Baba). Now I do agree maybe he isn't 6'6.5. Depending on what time he went to the doctor of course and at that range. So it's not impossible that he wakes at 6'7 and may only be 6'6" by night but doubt he falls much below that.

Alex said on 28/Jun/16
He looks more 197 cm, nothing more. Rob had to be under his chin if he was a real 199 cm

Jordan87 said on 13/Jun/16
He is 6'6 with his hair. 6'5 Without if you are going by this photo.

Lord Beerus said on 21/May/16
Rob how is he 6ft6.5, when he looks like 6ft6 on the dot.

James B said on 15/May/16
He only looks 6'6 under the ruler cause of his hair

Josh said on 12/May/16
The ruler you added shows exactly 6'6...

James B said on 3/May/16
He would be the first 6'6.75 on this site

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/16
Rob, maybe 200cm is a better compromise?

Might have measured both claims

Editor Rob: I'd say this listing is a low mark for him.

Moke said on 24/Apr/16
Rob, for me his eyelevel looks pretty much 6'1.
Do you think his eyelevel is 5.3 inches?

Editor Rob: his eyelevel doesn't look much more than 5 inches

Johno said on 23/Apr/16
Between 6'5.75-6'6 at his lowest and around 6'6.75 or so at his peak.

6'6.5 (Morning measurement)

Peter 180cm said on 13/Apr/16
Looks 196-197cm range above with Rob,but with 1cm less footwear,so 198cm or legit 6'6 looks reasonable,imo...Maybe he had a morning physical and got measured at 6'6.5 or solid 199cm,that's what i believe anyway,and could be a guy who wakes up at 6'7 and goes to bed at 6'5.75-6'6 range,afterall 1 inch loss at that height is very normal.

S.J.H said on 2/Apr/16
Rob, i agree with you he's like 6'7.5 out of bed and probably an easy 6'7 for a morning physical. But i still doubt he might be measured 199.4-199.6cm on afternoon physical which he just say 6'6.5 (199.2cm) and this could be he's lowest height

S.J.H said on 30/Mar/16
Rob, do you think that cudmore might be downplay a little like he atually measured close to metric 200cm (6'6.75) but not quite?

Editor Rob: I can believe his 6ft 6.5 measurement as an afternoon, and is a guy who is nearer 6ft 7.5 out of bed.

joe @@ said on 21/Mar/16
James B
Forget Graphical height
it look like bad posture and has disvangem footwear here

Jedi Master 5'11 said on 19/Mar/16
I mean, if we're going to the very tip of where our hair lands then I can just start calling myself Jedi Master 6'0". Looks like he's hunched over a bit so 6'6.5" would probably be right.

If this guy was bald, he'd still be 6'6"!

James B said on 19/Mar/16
oe @@ said on 17/Mar/16
it definitely is above 6'5.25
this time it is between 199cm and 198cm

his hair makes him 6'6 but if it's was flattened down he would not be over 6'5 under the scale

joe @@ said on 17/Mar/16
it definitely is above 6'5.25
this time it is between 199cm and 198cm

TJE said on 15/Mar/16
198 cm

James B said on 13/Mar/16
Comes in at 6'5.25 against the height chart

joe @@ said on 1/Mar/16
Rob, 6'6 possible?

Editor Rob: he rarely looks that low, more often nearer 6ft 7 than 6.

joe### said on 1/Mar/16
**** does not seem appears to be in 6'6

mrtguy said on 17/Feb/16
kurtz said on 11/Feb/16
6' 5-1/2"

Just because Rob scaled the image doesn't mean he's 6'5.5'' , cudmore is at least 6'6'' minimum anything under that is ridiculous.

kurtz said on 11/Feb/16
6' 5-1/2"

S.J.H said on 31/Jan/16
Only time he was 6'7 could be morning out of bed by an half hour and probably 201cm out of bed

120 said on 26/Jan/16
Well, i predicted it. He is definitely a bit underneath the 6'7" mark at night time.

Guyster said on 17/Jan/16
Rob with Cudmores height being amended to 6"6.5 would we be making 6"7 as his peak height, regards.

Editor Rob: I'd say he could be anywhere between 1-1.5 inches taller first thing out of bed.

Tarinator said on 22/Nov/15
6'6.5" (199 cm) tall? Interesting...... Well I did say that would be the bare minimum. But depending on the time, he should like 2 m tall.

CD said on 17/Nov/15
So in conclusion 6ft 6.5 is of course the best guess now he is saying it, just there is more chance he's over that mark than under.

Editor Rob: could depend on the time of day measured. I cannot now recall which day we got this, so am not sure if it was 9.30am or 12-12:30pm, but either way he wouldn't be at his lowest.

CD said on 17/Nov/15
@Andrea
That can be said for pretty much any celeb who has been measured, although I'd say Daniel has a higher probability of getting a low measurement than a "tall" one. I think many others would naturally stand at their tallest, but for him there's a chance he'd stand a bit looser. Just think about Big G, he was measured by Rob in the most careful way, but people still argued about his actual height (a lot of it on the basis that he actually stood "too tall"!). But I can see why he will stick at 6ft 6.5 now, he looks 10 inches taller than Rob and with 0.4in less footwear, and Rob even thinks he may not have been at his lowest when they met...

Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 15/Nov/15
6'6.5" legit.

Andrea said on 14/Nov/15
CD, this way you can go on discussing over and over again... Rob said he doubt he'd measure under 6'6.5 (in one of the older comments)! Daniel came out with this 6'6.5 measurement, so i think it's fine to go with that!
What about Kobe Bryant? Not only we do not know whether he was standing at his tallest but he was measured by her wife!!! And, even if he looks taller than that next to other celebrities (and even some basketball players), he still is listed at 6'4.75, her wife measurement!
Anyway, since Daniel is so nice and answered me on the first try, i will ask him if he can go visit Rob at his place to get PROPERLY measured by his stadiometer! And hey Rob remember to tell him to stand at his tallest, the same way you did with Big G :)

CD said on 13/Nov/15
I'd definitely say 6ft 6.75 is still very arguable for him, he looked to clear 6ft 6 in person to Rob (which the photo shows) and with 0.4in less footwear. Not only will the guy round down at any opportunity, but he might not stand fully tall.

CD said on 11/Nov/15
Rob, is there a chance Daniel could stretch out another fraction from his 6ft 6.5 measurement (you couldn't rule out him not standing at his tallest)? You did think he was near enough 6ft 7 range.

Editor Rob: I suppose you could say - he was measured that mark, but was he standing at his tallest?

I doubt he was at his lowest mark when we seen him...

Andrea said on 11/Nov/15
Thanks, i'm glad to help with "better" listings... ;)
After all, you were right... He IS over 6'6 flat but not quite the full 6'7! He simply doesn't bother about that half an inch! It's good to see that there are some celebrities who are still honest!
I think a guy like Lance Reddick might have done the same thing and just goes with 6'2, even if he's a fraction taller than that!
Then you have a guy like Kristian Nairn who has claimed to be even 6'11 but i doubt he's 4.5 inches taller than Daniel in person, right?

Editor Rob: to be fair to Nairn, his walking posture is probably a helluva lot worse than cudmore, who seems to walk tall.

Andrea said on 10/Nov/15
Rob, just for you: Click Here
What did i win? :)

Editor Rob: congratulations on getting the statement of 6ft 6.5 from him :) We will give him that mark.

Andrea said on 9/Nov/15
Well, Nairn looks 6'7-6'8 with you, Daniel is not any taller than 6'7, so yeah he must be a bit shorter than him... Btw, would you mind if i link this page to Daniel on Twitter? I'm curious to see what he says about it...

Editor Rob: yeah sure, I don't know if he would respond or not, but he seems to be going with that 6ft 6 mark now...

Andrea said on 6/Nov/15
Talking about Twitter, Rob, Daniel has claimed to be 6'6 a lot of times, someone recently asked him if he is 6'6 or 6'7 and he said 6'6... So he's pretty consistent with this 6'6 claim. I tried to ask him too, let's see what he says...

Editor Rob: to be fair, it is a bit like Lee Pace (who we know does claim that 6ft 4-5 range, although I still don't know if he is that tall barefeet)...

it seems like Daniel is rounding down to get a foot in the door for more projects because of the rejection based on 6ft 7.

I seen a photo but lost it of Cudmore shorter than nairn in a photo...it was from a convention but didn't bookmark the thing!

Moke said on 13/Oct/15
I think this guy is 2.00m (6'6.75) almost on the dot. He's got a full head on Rob and is still standing a bit further away from the camera. 173 cm + aprox. 25 cm (one head) + 1 cm shoe disadvantage + standing a bit behind = 2m : )

[Editor Rob: we're very close (within half inch), although Jenny is a few inches closer to the camera...his left shoulder is rotated back a bit and right shoulder forward because I stood beside first...

compare actual head size on left to the cudmore shot and you see my head appears smaller because I'm obviously a few inches further away from the lense than Jenny...
]

Matthew190 said on 28/Sep/15
I think his 6'6" claims point to him probably dipping under 6'7" at the very least. 6'6.5" or 6'6.75" should be his listing I think. Tall guy, for sure. Big G thought he was 6'5".

Luke 5'8.25 19 years said on 22/Sep/15
6'7.75 downgrade

Arch Stanton said on 13/Sep/15
Yes, I'd have guessed 6'6.75 (200 cm) for him too. Crouch is nearer 6 ft 8 than 7.

James B said on 30/Aug/15
Cudmore 6'6.75
Crouch 6'7.75

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Aug/15
Rob, is 200cm possible?

I have a feeling that Peter Crouch would have about 1in on this dude, back-to-back.

[Editor Rob: it's only a fraction under 6ft 7, it is possible, but I wouldn't try to argue only 6ft 6 for daniel.]

joe said on 19/Aug/15
I think it was less flat footwear 6'7 think she looks this time

James B said on 17/Aug/15
Very big man indeed

Jakertini said on 9/Aug/15
I feel like he is around 6'6.5". I pictured a 1' ruler on the top of rob's head and he seems to be around 10-10.5 inches taller than 5'8" rob

Tarinator said on 28/Jul/15
I think he would have the edge on solid 6'6" guys like Victor Williams or Nicholas Braun. 200 - 201 would be an excellent guess for this guy's height of course. I'd probably see this guy on average stooping down 5 cm in his later years. Maybe 6'5"?

Allie said on 24/Jul/15
Nothing below 200cm

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jun/15
I could see him dropping closer to 200cm at his low (i.e. 200.3cm) but never beloe that.
Probably 203-204cm range out of bed

Tarinator said on 14/Jun/15
He looks of 200 cm in height in this photo.

Lorne??? said on 14/Jun/15
Understating with the 6'6. And/or, as Rob mentioned, really did get something like 6ft6.8 one day, and went with that, but he seems to downplay his height anyway.

I'd be truly surprised if this guy was really much less than 2 meters tall...

mrtguy said on 25/May/15
Luigi says on 5/Mar/15
he looks 6'9''

He looks shorter than Nairn who is listed at 6'9''. 6'6.5 or 6'7'' seems about right.

Matthew said on 8/May/15
Looks about 198 cm here but I do believe 199/200 cm if measured.

120 said on 28/Mar/15
He looks a sub 6ft 7

joe 193cm night said on 7/Mar/15
looks very close to 6'7 (2001) if it is not to be at least 6'6.75 (200)

S.J.H said on 6/Mar/15
6'6 and 3/4 out of this picture

Luigi said on 5/Mar/15
he looks 6'9''

Tunman said on 17/Feb/15
Doubt it Mr.L his head is more likely 10",9.5 would be small for someone that height,I think Rob could be closer to the camera.
At least 10" taller and with shoe disadvantage,making him at worst 6'6.5-6.75.
Maybe 200 or 6'6.75 is perfect.

Mr. L said on 15/Feb/15
Rob, your head is 9.5 inches long. His chin starts at the top of your head, and his face is about the ame size as yours. This means that he's about 9.5 inches taller than you are, making him 6' 6" max and possibly 6' 5.5"

Andrea said on 9/Feb/15
Rob, you think he'd be similar to Lebron James? Lebron looks taller next to Hugh, he looks at least 6 big inches taller, i'm not sure Daniel looks that much taller from the few pics out there...

[Editor Rob: there's a good chance jackman is a fraction less today than when he filmed with cudmore, but Lebron does generally look a big 6ft 7 ranger.]

Alex 6'0 said on 28/Jan/15
Looks exactly a head taller than Rob with about 1/2 inch less footwear so Rob would be a fraction below his chin. Now depends on much his head length is. Figure a 10 inch head plus 1/2 inch less footwear we got 10.5 inches. That's 6'6.75. Really at worst 6'6.5 would be his height.

Lillo thomas said on 9/Jan/15
Arch stanton dennis rodman claimed 6'6 for himself and the nba listed him at 6'8 , between 6'6 and 6'7 must be his real height. I would give him 6'6.5

Arch Stanton said on 6/Jan/15
Rob, can you or somebody please just clear up Dennis Rodman's actual height! I've heard 6'6 or 6'8" for years now and I'm still no closer to the truth. On Big Brother I thought he looked 6'6" next to the 6'5 rapper from Goldie Lookin Chain but with Hulk Hogan in that clip he looks near 6'8!!

Lonestar said on 4/Jan/15
LOL. Afrojack is no way taller than cudmore. Afrojack only look max 6ft6.5 next to 6ft4 snoop dogg on a music video.

Ericlegrand said on 30/Dec/14
Rob, do u think this guy would edge out Afrojack? I think Afrojack could be a fraction taller. Cudmore about 6'6"75, Afrojack a full 6'7

[Editor Rob: they could be very close.

But I'd be surprised if Cudmore really was sub 6ft 7 more than a small amount at worst.]

blue said on 15/Dec/14
@Rob
Daniel seems to be very muscled! do you think that his musculature make him shrink more than normal?...but he must have a very muscled back, maybe that compensate,no?

[Editor Rob: his long spine might mean he shrinks more than your average 1.8-1.9cm, he might go 3cm from rising to bed.

If you do a lot of weights and measure afterwards you might find your spine gets compressed to an absolute low that those who don't do as intensive physical work wouldn't reach.]

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Nov/14
I can understand people mistaking him for 6ft8. He'd definitely clear that mark out of bed

Vegas said on 25/Nov/14
Arch Stanton says on 4/Nov/14
@Vegas. Rodman was barely taller than the 6'5" rapper from Goldie Lookin Chain on Big Brother and no more than four inches taller than 6'2" Callum Best.
_________

how tall does hogan look here next to rodman..and thats over 20 years ago Click Here

remember the shortest guy in this shot isiah thomas was roughly same height as a peak will smith Click Here

Judd said on 21/Nov/14
he has one head on jenny (with same shoes)...6'6-7" is believable

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Nov/14
Rob, do you think Cudmore is taller than Bruce Spence?

lion said on 28/Aug/14
He's an honest guy about his height. He knows he is between 6'6-6'7 but not sure which one to claim. I estimate him to be 6'6.75 give or take .25 inch.

Bishop said on 6/Aug/14
I would say exactly 6'6.75". I'm only saying that because I would like to see someone on this site that's exactly 200 cm.

Sam said on 6/Aug/14
Rob did he look taller than Clive Russell in person?

[Editor Rob: with effectively 0.4in less footwear than Clive, Cudmore still came across taller.]

DaDang said on 5/Aug/14
he look's 6'5.5'' to 6'6''

KROC said on 28/Jul/14
Looks 6'6.5 to me. Probably explains why he rounds down on occasion in interviews.

Mathew said on 23/Jul/14
Somewhere 199 - 200 cm range. People often forget how tall that really is!

Josh said on 19/Jul/14
Looks 6´6

Alex 6'0 said on 7/Jun/14
Rob, you said his head is 10 inches long? Well it looks just over a head difference with the small footwear advantage. Lowest I could say he looks is 6'6.5

Rhonda said on 30/May/14
Looks not quite a head taller but considering footwear, say he has 10 inch head above Rob then 6ft 6 he is.

Mathew said on 19/May/14
berta says on 8/May/14
Click Here he says that he is 6 foot 6 in this interview afgter 6 minutes and 55 seconds. i think he is a very very strong 6'6 , weak 6'7 . 199,5-200 cmv

---

I agree 6'6.5" would be a good listing for him. He doesn't look a strong 6'7" in the photo but he's also claimed 6'7" so I think it would be fair to list him between the two heights he claimed.

Andrea said on 18/May/14
Rob, i saw your old friend G met him and Daniel told him to be 6'6 too... He's said to be 6'6 too many times to be no less than 6'7 in my opinion. Of course, i doubt he's 6'6 flat but he's not 6'7 either!! 6'6.5 could be on the money...

[Editor Rob: hah, I wonder if anybody would believe G would think that he looked 6ft 5 in person!

all the 6ft 5 guys want to be 6ft 6 and Cudmore, a guy near 6ft 7 wants to be 6ft 6...must be the magic number with casting directors!]

berta said on 8/May/14
Click Here he says that he is 6 foot 6 in this interview afgter 6 minutes and 55 seconds. i think he is a very very strong 6'6 , weak 6'7 . 199,5-200 cm

Alex 6'0 said on 30/Apr/14
His head looks more than the average 9.5. Id say 10-10.5 inches. Really at worst he would be 6'6.5.

At 6'0 I think I'd come up to bottom of his nose

Arch Stanton said on 26/Apr/14
I really think 6'6.5" is the lowest you could really argue. He looked roughly 200cm in the comparison I did.

Arch Stanton said on 26/Apr/14
6 ft 6 flat is impossible, I did a comparison with Challenger 15 and there's absolutely no way he only had 3/4 on inch on him.

Matthieus said on 18/Apr/14
He looks like a giant! And I'm a bit shorter than you, Rob.

Mathew said on 14/Apr/14
[Editor Rob: it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.]

---

Maybe a 199 - 200 cm listing to split the difference would be fair. Sounds like you'd lean more towards 200 cm having seen him in person.

Andrea said on 13/Apr/14
In fact, i said 6'6 flat is hard to believe but you yourself said 6'6.5 is not impossible so he could have measured near it on a bad day and just went with 6'6... The same way Lance Reddick claimed 6'2...

[Editor Rob: it's not impossible, but much more than a little shy of 6ft 7 I'd find hard to believe.]

Andrea said on 13/Apr/14
Well, if he claimed 6'6, he must have measured that mark! Probably got measured between 6'6 and 6'7 and claimed both heights! Still doubt he's 6'6 flat, but he's not a full 6'7 either (or that claim wouldnt make any sense). 6'6.5-6'7 is definitely his range, over 6'6 but not quite 6'7...

[Editor Rob: he's downplayed it with a 6ft 6 claim (or he could have measured just under 6ft 7 and has dropped the 7/8ths!)...at his height getting roles is a tough business.

I would be shocked beyond belief if he was only 6ft 6 flat...I mean he looked over 6ft 6 and with less footwear I believe the 6ft 7 claim is real.]

Pedro said on 12/Apr/14
In this video-interview he actually said that he is 6'6": Click Here
So he was either understating his height or he is maybe more like 6'6.5".

[Editor Rob: I do think he really is 6ft 7.]

Emmett said on 10/Apr/14
He's very handsome and well proportioned for a man this huge. He's very well built, so he avoids looking lanky, but he's also doesn't give off a 'giant' impression.

avi said on 14/Feb/14
@Lorne
Not a full head but close A 6'6.5 listing is fair but 6'7 is close. There's about 10.25 inches here factor in the .4 advantage for Rob then we are talking 6'6.75 almost. That's his real listing I think.

176,2Tunman said on 9/Feb/14
At least a strong 10in taller than Rob,without footwear disadvantage I would say 10.5.Since Rob is a little over 5'8, Daniel is probably very close to 6'7 maybe 6'6.75 would suit him better.Great actor anyways.

carl199cm said on 7/Feb/14
im 110 kgs for 199 he has to be around that too.

Colossus said on 19/Jan/14
Hey Rob How much do you think he weighs on this photo: Click Here at least 100kg,no?
Is he a nice guy?

[Editor Rob: yes he was a cool guy to meet and I'd say yeah at least a bit over 100kg, maybe nearer 110 there.]

Chris said on 18/Jan/14
I am 6'4 ft (193-194), where do you think the edge of my head would be at, Rob?

[Editor Rob: normally I would look around the mouth of a 6ft 4 man, even sometimes under his mouth if the camera angle favoured the tall man.

in your case a 6ft 4 man would look about a good inch above daniel's eyebrows ]

avi said on 13/Jan/14
@Rob
Would I get to the middle of his nose?

[Editor Rob: at 6ft you'd probably be end of his nose.]

Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/14
In the comparison with #15 I guessed Cudmore at 200cm. I think he'd measure very close to the 6'7" mark if not on the nose earlier in the day.

Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/14
Trust me, I did a sheet comparison during the 15 people contest and Cudmore DEFINITELY had over an inch on Challenger 15 accounting for the footwear. I know #15 can look like 6'7-6'8 at first glance but the lowest you could argue for Cudmore is really 6'6.5".

sigge said on 10/Jan/14
10 inches taller than rob+about 0.5 for shoe disadvantage. He is 6'6.5.

Mathew said on 8/Jan/14
Lorne says on 19/Dec/13
No less than 2 meters. People saying the 196cm challenger looks taller just don't understand height works, Rob is a full head shorter, and the guy is in Converse. People who understand that, you can trust they're estimates ;)

---

Not to be picky, but challenger 15 also appeared a head taller than Rob. I do think Cudmore would measure over 6'6", but in the photo he doesn't look it.

issuetall said on 20/Dec/13
Shaun says on 10/Aug/12
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
@@@
Steven=6'5< Robert Maillet=6'11(210cm), average height in Russia didn't you know? You short chinese ?

Mathew said on 12/Dec/13
Looking at this photo you see about a 24 cm difference in height (25 including footware), rather than 28. But people can look a little bit taller or shorter than they really are in one photo, especially because I'm sure he's not a guy who is trying to look extra tall for photos.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Dec/13
I'm beginning to lean more toward 199-200cm range for Cudmore.
But, let me say this, being 6ft5 to 6ft7 has more pros than cons.

Manza said on 1/Dec/13
He looks like 6.5

Arch Stanton said on 19/Nov/13
When you look at Cudmore standing it really is difficult to imagine he's practically the same height as Peter Crouch. Crouch's proportions make him look 6 ft 9, Cudmore's make him look 6'5"-6'6". I wouldn't bet on Cudmore measuring under 200cm, although it is possible his low is 199.

Arch Stanton said on 16/Nov/13
6 ft 7 would generally be a negative height I think but some guys like Cudmore/Peter Jones etc who are good looking and well proportioned for their height it could be a positive thing in the work place and walking in public. Every guy I know at this height though gets negative attention for being lanky, and they don't like being this tall. I still think 6'5" would be a more comfortable very tall height. 6'7" really is excessive.

Matt 184.7-186.7cm said on 3/Oct/13
If his head is 10 inches, he looks 6ft 6 with rob here +the shoe disadvantage 6ft 6.5, definitely 6ft 7+ at an earlier time of day

Lorne??? said on 26/Sep/13
Considering he is in Converse, I think he looks. Just as tall as Kristen Nairn!!! Seriously, make a line, then Knock half an inch off. Okay, do Nairn's head is bigger, but still, to me he doesn't look more than an inch shorter.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Sep/13
Could very well be a 199cm guy. But for sure nothing 6ft6.

Mathew said on 12/Sep/13
Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!

---

He isn't 197, but he sure does look 197 cm with Rob above. He's gotta be at least 199 - 200 cm in reality though.

avi said on 4/Sep/13
@Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13

I think he dips into the 6'6.5 area most of day if not by evening at the worst. Still could be weak 6'7.

Lo sgozzatore said on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!

Sixseven said on 23/Aug/13
Daniel Cudmore is 197cm tall(6'5.6")

Dean 5ft 9.25 said on 19/Aug/13
Rob what would you rather be 6ft 7 or 5ft 10?

[Editor Rob: 6ft 7 would be interesting if i was doing a height site like this, but living day to day 5ft 10 would be non stand out, nowhere near as many look at or notice you compared to giant heights...]

avi said on 11/Aug/13
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]

Theres no doubt hes a very tall guy but i was merely asking if its psosible hes in the 6'6.5 range at night at least. sssuming you are n par with his chin theres no way his head is 11 inches! his head must be 10 inches and he must be a 6'6.5 range. Jenny seems to come 1/4 below his chin or equal with it so about 10.25 difference here.

[Editor Rob: I think his head is a decent 10 inch, so 6ft 6.5 isn't impossible but I think measuring him you'd get 6ft 7]

avi said on 1/Aug/13
@Rob
Rob you may have been too busy to answer this:
"@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here..."
rob can you maybe show me a picture of him next to a 5'10 guy and to 6'1 guy? it may be easier to see the difference there

[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]

avi said on 17/Jul/13
@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here...

Connor 184cm said on 22/Jun/13
Rob do you think 6ft 7 is a bad height?

[Editor Rob: it's a standout height. More eyes are on you than the average man...for some people that would be a bad thing, but others would like the feeling of that and also taller people are given more leeway in work and are thought of in a better sense than the smaller man.

There can be advantages and disadvantages in general day to day living. Imagine going on the tube/buses/flights/cars regularly - it's more physically challenging being extremely tall than being average in situations like that.]

lelman said on 14/Jun/13
Rob, is he the tallest guy you and Jenny have gotten a photo with?

Real big guy, easily 6'7"

[Editor Rob: there's ian whyte who is tallest so far.]

avi said on 7/Jun/13
the difference between me and my mom is like this so 10 inches probably.

Thor/Johno said on 30/May/13
I rest my point, ian is so tall that i could not tell the difference between 6'11, 7'0, 7'1 or 7'2

Thor said on 30/May/13
Jimmy, i have no idea. He is to tall and the difference between rob, jenny and him is far to great.

Put it this way, if rob measured him at 7'1, i would say cool he looks it, if measured him at 7'0, i would say cool he looks it and if rob measured him at 7'2 or 7'3, i would say cool he looks it.

You see, if rob was at least 6'5, i could reasonably deduce ian's height but he isn't. The only way round it would be to compared challenger 15 with rob and ian with rob and work out the difference and even then it wouldn't be accurate.

In real life if i saw a 6'7 contender or 6'8, 6.8.5 i would not able to tell. I cannot tell the difference between 6'9 - 7'0 honestly. Similarly, i cannot tell if some is 4'10, 4'11 or 5'0? or eg 3'3 - 3'8 - the height's are just to far out from my height. I doubt those individuals would be able to tell how tall i am but if someone was 5'0 or above, could reasonably predict my height, or someone that was upto 6'5, probably could deduce my height to.

I can tell the difference between someone who is 5'0 - 6'6, those parameters.

Ian is massive guy, i'll leave him at his listed height of 7'1

jimmy said on 29/May/13
Johno how tall do u think this guy is?Click Here

jimmy said on 17/May/13
So Cudmore looked at least 1.25" taller than #15 who is 6'5.2" at his lowest having 0.4" less footwear than Rob.So he can't be under 6'6.75".And as Rob has said #15 looks taller than he measures.Rob have you seen Joe again? I doubt that he is legit 6'5",but with a tad more footwear he looks closer to 6'5" than 6'3" or 6'4" as Johno insists.He looks clearly taller than a guy like Kevin Sorbo.

johno said on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.

As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .

rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty hard to tell since the difference between him and rob is great )

johno said on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.

As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .

johno said on 14/May/13
Jimmy my point is, joe looked a strong 6'3 range with rob rather then strong 6'4 so effectively he could be around 6'3.75 aswell not neccessarily at 6'3.25 in the evening.

With cudmore i put him at upper 6'5 range, lower 6'6 judging by the above picture. Taller then challenger 15 as rob stated. As stated earlier, cudmore is one head length taller then rob ie 9 - 9.5 inches plus shoe deficit. Another approach is to compare this picture with challnger 15's and you will see that he comes a fraction shorter with a footwear disadvantage but obviously taller without. Even from an overall profile perspective, cudmore gives me 6'5 indication but taking account of footwear, a weak 6'6 profile man.

Sure he could measure 6'7 or 6'6.5 by the measuring tape but since he is so tall a 0.75 inches margin of error becomes irrelevant in the context of things. If i didn't have rob's guideline of 6'7 and using challenger 15's picture, head length and general overview i would have put cudmore at a weak 6'6 evening time. I would pretty nervou with a 6'7 or 6'6.5 bet and that's the criteria i go by and it is not fullproof but i am comfortable with my estimation.

joe strong 6'3 range or weak 6'4 (sound better)
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6

[Editor Rob: I saw the big height challenger the other day in the supermarket and he definitely gives a bigger look than joe does, but Cudmore is taller in person, at least 1-1.5 inches]

jimmy said on 13/May/13
@Johno Manganiello at 6'.3.25" this guy at 6'5.5".I think u are underestimating heights a big time.

Johno said on 5/May/13
Jimmy, i was scaling the picture of rob with challenger 15 and cudmore comes out a bit shorter. The fact that cudmore has footwear disadvantage would make cudmore about the same height as challenger 15. I have given cudmore an extra 0.5 inches for assurance.

Further, cudmore skull is not any longer then rob's ie 9-9.5 inches. Rob is around his chin level, which would make cudmore about 6'5.5 - 6'6 taking footwear into account. Thats why i put cudmore in the upper 6'5 range.

Rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6 (pretty fair)

jimmy said on 28/Apr/13
Johno says on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration

Daniel has longer head than 15.And the angle of the photo makes 15 look taller than he really is.

Johno said on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration

John said on 25/Apr/13
Well, at last someone taller then me...

wiltonstilts said on 25/Apr/13
He does appear to be 6'6

jimmy said on 8/Apr/13
His head looks quite long.10"-10.5" Rob?

[Editor Rob: not more than 10 inches]

jimmy said on 2/Apr/13
He looks at least 10.5' taller than Rob who is 5'8.2" and with 0.4 advantage.Minimum flat 6'7".

Arch Stanton said on 16/Mar/13
A legit 6'7" barefoot is just a huge body frame to be carrying around. I feel pretty tall at my height and if I hold a mirror up and see where 6'7" is on my door I always find it amazing how a guy could be that big or more barefoot. Guys like Cudmore must feel extremely tall wherever they go. To the point of being awkward i think. A legit 6'7" and over is an extreme height for a human being, without a doubt!

Elijah said on 10/Mar/13
Legit listing. You two look like his children. lol

Fern194cm-192cm said on 18/Feb/13
No guys, He looks a legit 6,7. First off, Rob is really 5,8 and change (not just 5,8 flat) and second my brother is 6,6.5 at night and beside a 5,8.5 guy he looks about the same!

Nick 189 said on 15/Feb/13
Looks 6'6

Nick 189 said on 15/Feb/13
Looks 6'6

Ramsay said on 21/Jan/13
Aragorn, why do you think you can estimate his height so precisely? Have you stood with him next to a stadiometer?

Aragorn 5\'11 said on 17/Jan/13
Legit 200 cm. (6'6.75) Just a little bit under 6'7.

John said on 9/Jan/13
Tim, well I'd definitely prefer to not be that tall if thats what you mean

Mathew said on 31/Dec/12
Looks 6'5.5" - 6'6" in the picture, although with the 1 cm footware disadvantage. He could be 6'6.5" - 6'6.75" rather than the full 6'7".

truth said on 30/Dec/12
a solid 6ft7. Gigantic.

Lo sgozzatore said on 17/Dec/12
Legit 6'7 guy, i doubt he's anything less than 2 metres

J.J. said on 10/Dec/12
@Larc-186.7-188.6cm I'd say 6'7" or exactly 200cm/2m is when people start to appear extremely tall. because that is over 99.9% on the growth chart

Tim said on 8/Dec/12
Is 6'7" past the point of being reasonably tall? Seems like with that height you'd have a lot of trouble just doing usual things like driving or showering

mId said on 25/Nov/12
Hmm.. I'm 183 cm and have a friend that's 202 cm and somehow this difference between Rob/Jenny and this guy doesn't shock me? I remember me and my friend stood next to eachother in a shopping-mall mirror and I looked like a kid next to him. Rob/Jenny is supposed to be 4" shorter than me.. so adding 4" on them in this photo and they wouldn't look that "towered".. but I thought I did with my friend.. weird :/ I would have guessed maybe 194-195 for this guy based on this pic.

James said on 19/Nov/12
6'6.5. Its not that shocking seeing this guy next too 2 5'8ers.

I think if you stood this guy next too peter crouch there would be a good 1 inch between the 2.

runt said on 19/Nov/12
Not a hair over 6'6.875"

getting_taller said on 17/Nov/12
So this is what a 6'7" looks like standing beside 5'8" footers whew. Clearly taller than Manganiello,Mcpartlin,Momoa.

The Exorcist said on 12/Nov/12
Very tall!

Larc-186.7-188.6cm said on 7/Nov/12
6'6-6'7 starts to appear extremely tall.

He's 6'7 for sure.

Caren said on 5/Nov/12
It's nice to see such a tall person stand up so straight! So many of them slouch!

Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Looking again that right photo of the Challenger 15 he looks MASSIVE. At first glance you think he's near 6 ft 8.

Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
That's right I think Cudmore had an inch on #15 and adjusting for Rob's shoe advantage I added half an inch and pretty much got 200 cm for him in comparison

Here he is next to Jackman. Jackman's posture isn't the best and Cudmore's is almost Stallone like but Cudmore actually makes Jackman looks a 6'1"er here. In that photo its difficult to see him even a hair under 6 ft 7 even accounting for posture differences.

Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Mathew says on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]

I did the comparison Mathew when we were doing the Challenges. Cudmore had about 1.5 inches on Challenger 15 accounting for Rob's footwear advantage. If the big guy is just shy of 6'5.5" Cudmore is pretty much around 6'7" as he claims legitimately. Cudmore does look more 6'6" to the eye here but I think the lowest he could possibly be in comparison to #15 is 199.5-200cm. Cudmore could be 2 metres flat which is virtually 6'7" but for sure he's nothing under 6'6.5".

TNTinFL said on 23/Aug/12
Can't argue with that height. I actually thought he was taller; 6'8". When I first saw him on X2 was during that scene where they were raiding the mansion. He was barefoot and still towered over 6'2" (and change) Jackman.

Mathew said on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.

[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]

Hob said on 7/Aug/12
"Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?"

shuan, i don't get you. i did not claim 6'5 by you were think 0.5" shape off to 6'4.5 my height? im tall and not far to reach cudmore claim but i choose not to claim height here. thankful shuan.. by the way cudmore does't not look 6'7 even to pity to him without shoe advantage next to 5'8.25 rob in 1 inch shoe. my guess still 6'6.5 for cudmore or max 6'6.75

matt789 said on 27/Jul/12
he looks a solid 6 foot 6 and a weak 6 foot 7

Mathew said on 7/Feb/12
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?

---

I don't think he looks an inch and a half taller than Challenger 15, I know he's loosing a cm to footware though so it becomes closer to that. 6'6.5" is okay to me, but 6'7" is kind of pushing it.

Shaun said on 28/Jan/12
6'6.5" is 199.5 cm right? Yeah I can buy about that or 200cm but I cant see him as a flat 6'6" guy or lower, he looks a couple of inches taller than somebody of Ryan McPartlin's height, as you say Cudmore looks extremely tall and McPartlin a more modest "very tall". He does look close enough to 6'7" to round up half an inch as is common amongst taller guys in Hollywood and in general. He looks well proportioned at this height though, compared to several other English lamposts I can think over LOL...

Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?

[Editor Rob: well he looked in the 6ft 6 range, and the challenger 15 looked 6ft 5 range, but cudmore of course had converse while i had an inch, so I would doubt he'd measure under 6ft 6.5.]

Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
If you compare this guy to Challenger 15 and then take into account Rob's footwear he's close enough to 6'7" if not on the mark. I can see 200c, but I doubt he under that.

Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?

steven said on 18/Jan/12
rob, cudmore should be downgrade at least 6'6.5. #15 guy does't look much on 1" shorter than cudmore look.

steven said on 14/Jan/12
i see daniel cudmore here is 6'6 and 6'7 in shoe 6'6.75 in sneakers. i usually think 6'3 for ryan mcpartlin , but after some reason i convince he is about 6'4 and looks it with rob. from here we see daniel cudmore had less footwear by 1cm than rob he look full almost 10" taller than rob which could have make him 6'6.25 and 6'6 flat min. he had regular size head ,does't had over 10" head so 6'6 would't be wrong.

JM9 said on 13/Jan/12
I would agree Witchdoctor, but there are three other things: Rob has a 1 cm footwear advantage here, and he is standing nearer to the camera than Cudmore. Plus, Cudmore appears to have a longer head (maybe 2-3cm) than the man in that challenge. Put that together and I can see 4-5 cm.

Witchdoctor said on 13/Jan/12
if Challenge 15 is 1.96m than Daniel cudmore is around 1.99m,chances that daniel is 5cm taller are just really slim!

ANDREA[ITA] said on 2/Jan/12
Rob, what about around 199 before bed? You said that very tall guys loose more height during the day! So if 202-203 out of bed and 199 before bed is a possibility? Or he never dips below 200?

ChiasmataX said on 24/Dec/11
He looked a legit 6'6 in this picture. It is easy to tell because a legit 6'6 will have a full head over 5'8-5'8.5 people.

avi said on 24/Dec/11
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.]

yes maybe you feel that way but the evidence points to Cudmore being about 1.5 inches taller than Mcpartlin. but lets say you are right and it is 2 inches then Cudmore should be a weak 6'6.5 dipping into the 6'6 .25 zone. plus Mcpartlin could be 6'4.25. So you should drop Cudmore down to 6'6.5 he looks a weak 6'6 with you BUT like you said you have .4 advantage. So 6'6 is very generous. Not a 6'7er...

samuel said on 24/Dec/11
6'6 fine

Mathew said on 23/Dec/11
He looks about 197 cm in the picture. Factor in the footware disadvantage and he looks 6'6".

Shaun said on 18/Dec/11
I think at some point in the day he might measure 200cm barefoot. He's clearly very close to 6'7".

anonim said on 15/Nov/11
Up to 192 I think this guy does not stop 2 meters!

Physics Enemy said on 13/Nov/11
For me 6' 2" evening is the start of very tall.

Tom101 said on 13/Nov/11
id say around 6-7" here,my friend is 6-7" and im 6-2.5" so i think knowing my other friends around 5-8" mark so to me hes that height.

think the half cm could make a little difference. if put lebron stand next to cudmore with both straight up , cudmore is 5mm down lebron but might had hair advantage 2-2.5cm on almost bald lebron and came out people would argue cudmore is 6'8 and lebron is shorter. this thing happen in reality we seen.

Lucoso said on 26/Oct/11
very tall almost 2m

Shaun said on 25/Oct/11
Na a legit 6 ft 6 barefoot guy will usually be considered extremely tall. A 6'5" guy though very tall. I'd agree on 6 ft 10 for a giant though.

Alex said on 22/Oct/11
Solid tall is 6'1-6'3. Very tall 6'4-6'6. 6'7-6'9 extremely tall then 6'10 plus is a giant

Legend said on 20/Oct/11
He's close to 6'7 whatever he is...I think I've guessed 6'6.5 before.

george555 said on 16/Oct/11
he looks at least 6'6-probably 6'6.5, 6'7 is too big of a height, he doesn't have 11 inches on Mamun.

Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" range, Virtual/borderline giant 6'8"-6'10", true giant 6'10" +??

Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" ramge

Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
For me a legit 6'3" evening height is the start of very tall.

Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah I'd probably agree with you on that Alex. A true giant has to be over 6'10" really but anything over 6'8" for me is the "mark". Cudmore I'd describe as extremely tall but not a "giant". Kim Kardashians husband Chris Humphries at 6'9" to me at times looks a giant or a borderline one.

LAN Jiao said on 16/Oct/11
rampage, u lost counting mamun hair. with mamun he look legit 199cm not even 201 or 202cm stop upgrading celebs..
i doubt his 6'7 201 claim was morning measurement. he only look 200 at best. between 199-200cm. maybe he hover just 199.5cm

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Oct/11
Looks 201cm-202cm or a strong 6ft7 with Mamun.

Alex said on 8/Oct/11
Could be 6'6 1/2 compared to Ryan but 6'7 is very possible too.

avi said on 6/Oct/11
Rob, looks more like 6'6. especially if compared to 6'4 and change Mcpartlin...

[Editor Rob: cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.]

Moke said on 3/Oct/11
So his head is 11 inches long then? wow!

James said on 2/Oct/11
Â® says on 29/Sep/11
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.

Swagger looks very bioo me and can even look bigger than 6'5 with his hairstyle like 6'6-6'7.

LAN Jiao said on 28/Sep/11
up here rob mention cudmore wore 0.6 converse but i did believe it is less than 0.6 while cumore is a very big guy probably 230pounds so his heavy after wore in the converse could be 0.35-0.4(1cm flat or under) therefore i can tell a giant 200cm daniel cudmore is easily over 2inch taller than armie hammer. because armie not 6ft5 , if you compare him to "6ft" leo di caprio he was big 4inch taller.

[Editor Rob: I doubt they shrinked much]

James said on 23/Sep/11
Shaun says on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.

Well Armmie could be 1 or 2cm less than 6'5 in my opinion. certainly tim robbins looks not normal height in photos. If you look at Ralf Moller who is 6'5-6'6 he looks far from normal sized in pics as well.

i think 6'4 is normal too a degree but i am not sure i would give 6'5 that label? i would defenintnly call 6'5 'super tall'. even 6'3 or 6'4 be branded as super sized.

Shaun said on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.

James said on 18/Sep/11
Shaun says on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.

I have heard people describe '6'5' as being circus show material. Although 6'5 is super tall i don't know about circus material? I know 6'4 is 'big' but it is defenintly not circus like since i had friends who were that tall. the thing is i rarely see legit 6'5 guys around and i don't have any friends who are that tall either.

Kostas said on 14/Sep/11
Cranberries,I know for sure that i do NOT,even if he is around a foot taller than me
i prefer being able to fit in cars and airplane seats

Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.

Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
A true giant I'd agree is 6'10" or over. But if you measure 6'9" barefoot last thing at night hard to deny that's a giant...

Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
Balthier says on 11/Sep/11
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.

And Jenny's a tall woman too, sure she towers a lot of short women.

James said on 11/Sep/11
Greenbolt says on 10/Sep/11
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart: