The duties of the housekeeper and mother, usually unite in the
same person; but difficult and perplexing as is the former relation, how
light and easy are all its claims compared with those of the latter. Among
my readers are many mothers — Let us for a little while hold counsel
together.

To the mind of a mother, who loves her children, no
subject can have so deep an interest as that which has respect to the
well-being of her offspring. Young mothers, especially, feel the need, the
great need of the hints and helps to be derived from others'
experience. To them, the duty of rightly guiding, forming and developing the
young mind is altogether a new one; at every step they feel their
incompetence, and are troubled at their lack of success. A young married
friend, the mother of two active little boys, said to me, one day,
earnestly,

"Oh! I think, sometimes, that I would give the world if I
only could see clearly what was my duty towards my children. I try to guide
them aright — I try to keep them from all improper influences — but rank
weeds continually spring up with the flowers I have planted. How shall I
extirpate these weeds, without injuring the flowers?"

How many a young mother thus thinks and feels. It is
indeed a great responsibility which rests upon her. With the most constant
and careful attention, she will find the task of keeping out the weeds
a hard one; but let her not become weary or discouraged. The enemy is
ever seeking to sow tares amid her wheat — and he will do it if she
sleeps at her post. Constant care, good precept, and, above all, good
example — will do much.

The gardener whose eye is ever over, and whose
hand is ever busy in his garden — accomplishes much. The measure of his
success may be seen if the eye rests for but a moment, on the garden of his
neighbor, the sluggard. Even if a weed springs up here and there, it is
quickly plucked up, and never allowed to obstruct or weaken the growth of
the healthy plants. A mole may enter stealthily, marring the beauty
of a flower-bed, and disturbing the roots of some garden-favorite, but
through the careful gardener's well-set enclosure, no beasts find an
entrance.

So it will be with the watchful, conscientious mother.
She will so fence around her children from external dangers and
allurements, that destructive beasts will be kept out. And she will, at the
same time cultivate the garden of their good affections, and extirpate the
weeds — that her children may grow up in moral health and beauty.

All this can be done. But the right path must be seen
before we can walk in it. Every mother feels as the one I have alluded
to; but some, while they feel as deeply, have not the clear perceptions of
what is right which others have. Much has been written on the subject of
guiding and governing children — much that is good — and much
that is of doubtful utility. I will here present, from the pen of an English
lady, whose work has not, we believe, been re-printed in this country, a
most excellent series of precepts. They deserve to be written in letters of
gold, and hung up in every nursery. She says —

The moment a child is born into the world, a mother's
duties commence; and of all those which God has allotted to mortals, there
are none so important as those which devolve upon a mother.

More feeble and helpless than any other living
creature, is an infant in the first days of its existence — unable to
minister to its own needs, unable even to make those needs known: a feeble
cry which indicates suffering, but not what or where the pain is — is all it
can utter. But to meet this weakness and incapacity on the part of the
infant, God has implanted in the heart of the mother a yearning affection to
her offspring, so that she feels this almost inanimate being to be a part of
herself, and every cry of pain acts as a dagger to her own heart.

And to humanity alone, of all the tribes of animated
beings, has a power been given to nullify this maternal feeling.
Beast, bird, and insect, attend to the needs of their offspring, accordingly
as those needs require much or little assiduity. But woman, if she will, can
drug and stupefy this feeling. She can commit the charge of
her child to servants, and need only to take care that enough is provided to
meet that child's wants, but need not see herself that those wants
are actually met.

But a woman who does this is far, very far, from doing
her maternal duty. Who is so fit to watch over the needs of infancy, as she
who gave that infant birth? Can a mother suppose, that if she can so stifle
those sensibilities which prompt her to provide for the needs of her
children — that her servants, in whom no such sensibilities exist, will be
very solicitous about their charge? How many of the infant's cries will be
unattended to, which would at once have made their way to the heart of a
mother! And, therefore, how many of the child's needs will in consequence
remain uncared for!

No one can understand so well the needs of a child
as a mother — no one is ever so ready to meet those needs as she.
And, therefore, to none but a mother, under ordinary circumstances, should
the entire charge of a child be committed. And in all countries in which
luxury has not so far attained the ascendency that, in order to partake
of its pleasures, a mother will desertheroffspring — the cares and
trials of maternal love are entered upon as the sweetest of enjoyments and
the greatest of pleasures.

It was a noble saying of a queen of France, "that none
should share with her the privileges of being a mother to her children." If
the same sentiment found its way into every heart — a very different aspect
in society would soon be produced.

How many, through ill-treatment and neglect in childhood
— carry the marks to their dying day, in weak and sickly constitutions!
These are but the too sure consequences of the neglect of a mother;
and, consequent upon that, the neglect of servants, who, feeling the
child to be a burden, lessen their own labors by not taking proper
care for the child. And many a mother who, perhaps, now that her child has
grown up, weeps bitter tears over his infirmities — might have saved his
pain and her own sorrow — by attending to his needs in infancy.

"Can a mother forget her nursing child?" asks the
inspired penman, in a way that it would seem to be so great an anomaly as
almost to amount to an impossibility. Yet modern luxury not only
proves that such a thing can be done, but it is one even of common
occurrence!

But if done, surely some great stake must be
pending — something on which life and property are concerned — that a mother
can thus forget the child of her bosom? Alas, no! The child is neglected,
that no interruption may take place in the mother's stream of selfish
pleasure! For the blandishments of the theater, or the excitements of
the dance — the child left to the charge of those who have no love
for it — no sympathy for its sufferings, no joyousness in
sharing in its pleasures.

A woman forfeits all claim to the sacred character of
a mother, if she abandons her offspring to the entire care of others.
For before she can do this, she must have stifled all the best feelings of
her nature, and become "worse than an infidel" — for she neglects her own
children!

Therefore should a mother, if she would fulfill her duty
— make her child her first care. It is not necessary that her whole
time should be spent in attending to its needs; but it is necessary that so
much time should be spent, that nothing should be neglected which could add
to the child's comfort and happiness. And not only is it needful that a
woman should show a motherly fondness for her child, so that she
should attend to its needs and be solicitous for its welfare — it is also
necessary that she should know HOW those needs are best to be
provided for, and how that welfare is best to be consulted.

To the natural instincts which prompt animals to
provide for their offspring — to humanity is added the noble gift of
reason; so that thought and solicitude are not merely the effects of
blind instinct, but the product of a higher and nobler faculty.

Yet without a knowledge of how the physical needs
of a child are to be met in the best manner, a mother cannot be said to be
performing her duty. For the kindness which is bestowed may be but the
result of natural feeling, which it would be far harder to resist, than to
fulfill; whereas the lack of knowledge may have resulted from ignorance and
idleness, and the loss of this knowledge will never be made up by natural
kindness and love. It will be like trying to work without hands, or to see
when the eyes are blinded.

But there is yet a higher duty devolving upon a mother.
She has to attend to the mental and moral needs of her
offspring, as well as to the physical needs. And as helpless as we
are born into the world if reference be made to our physical needs —
we are even yet more helpless if reference be made to our mental and
moral needs.

We come into the world with evil passions, perverted
faculties, and unholy dispositions. Let what will be said of the kindness
and attractiveness of children — there are in those young hearts the seeds
of every evil. It needs but that a note be taken of what passes in the
every-day life of a child, to convince that all is not so amiable as at
first sight appears — but that the heart hides dark deformity, headstrong
passions, and wicked thoughts!

Also to a mother's lot, it falls to be the
instructress of her children — their guide and pattern.
She fails in her duty, when she fails in either of these points. But it may
be said, that the requirement is greater than a mother can perform, and that
it would need angelic purity, to be able fully to meet it. For who shall say
that she is so perfect that no inconsistencies shall appear between what she
teaches, and what she practices? It would be, indeed, to
suppose mothers more than human to think that their instructions should be
perfect.

The best of mothers are liable to err, and the love a
mother has for her child may tempt her frequently to pass over faults
which she knows ought to be corrected. But making due allowance for human
incompetency and human sentimentality, still a mother will be bound to the utmost
of her power, to be the instructress of her child — equally by the
lesson she inculcates, and the example she exhibits.

There is, indeed, too much neglect shown in the
instruction of children. Mothers seem to think, that if amiable
qualities are shown in the exterior, that no instruction is necessary
for the heart. But this is a most futile attempt to make children
virtuous; it is like attempting to purify water half-way down the stream,
and leaving it still foul at the source.

The heart should be the first thing instructed. When
the heart is made to love virtue — the actions will be those
of virtue. For it is the heart which is the great mover of all actions
— and the moment a child can distinguish between a smile and a frown, from
that moment should instruction commence — an instruction suited
indeed to infantile capacities, but which should be enlarged as the child's
capacities expand.

It is very bad policy to allow the first years of a
child's life to pass without instruction; for if good is not written on the
mind when young — there is sure to be evil written there. It is a mother's
duty to watch the expanding intellect of her child, and to suit her
instructions accordingly. It is equally the mother's duty, so to learn the
child's disposition — to study its wishes, its hopes and its fears —
and to direct, control, and point them to noble aims and ends.

Oh! not alone is it needful that a mother be solicitous
for the health and temporal happiness of her child on earth —
a far higher and more important thought should engage her attention —
concern for her child as an immortal and an accountable being
to God!

To all who bear the endearing name of mother, thus
would we speak:

That child with whom you are so fondly playing — whose
happy and smiling countenance might serve for the picture of a cherub, and
whose merry laugh rings joyously and free — yes! that blooming child,
notwithstanding all these pleasing and attractive smiles — has a heart
prone to evil! To you is it committed to be the teacher of that
child; and on that teaching will mainly if not entirely, depend its future
happiness — or misery; not for only a few brief years — not for only a
life-time — but for eternity! For though a dying creature, the child
is still immortal, and the happiness or misery of that immortality, depends
largely upon your instruction.

Will you neglect or refuse to be your child's teacher?
Shall the world and its pleasures draw off your attention from
your maternal duty, when so much is at stake? Or will you leave your child
to glean knowledge as best it can, thus imbibing all worldly principles and
habits — most of them unwholesome, and many poisonous?

You can decide — you, the mother! You gave it life — you
may make that life a blessing or a curse, as you inculcate good or evil. For
if through your neglect, or through bad example, you let evil
passions gain an ascendency in your child — that child may grow into a
dissolute and immoral man! His career may be one of debauchery and
profaneness! And then, when he comes to die, in the agonies of remorse, in
the delirium of a conscience-stricken spirit — he may gasp out his last
breath with a curse on your head, for having given him life, but not
a disposition to use it aright — so that his has been a life of shame and
disgrace here on earth, and will be one of eternal misery hereafter!

That child's character is yet untrained; with you,
that decision rests — his destiny is largely in your hands. He may have
dispositions the most dark and foul — falseness, hatred and carnal lusts;
but you may prevent their growth. He may have dispositions the most kind and
attractive — and you can so order it, that contact with the world shall
never sully them. Yes, you — the mother — can prevent the evil — and nurture
the good! You can teach that child — you can train it,
discipline it. You can make your offspring so love you, that the
memory of your piety shall prevent their wickedness; and the hallowed
recollection of your goodness shall stimulate their own.

It is equally in your power to neglect your child.
By allowing pleasure to allure you — by following the follies of
fashion, or by the charm of those baubles which the world
presents to the eye, but keeps from your grasp — you may neglect your
child. But you have neglected a plain and positive duty — a duty which is
engraved on your heart, and put into your nature. A duty neglected is
sure, sooner or later, to come back again as an avenger to punish!
While, on the other hand, a duty performed to the best of the ability
— returns back to the performer laden with a blessing.

But it may be said,HOW are
children to be trained, in order that both
temporal and
eternal happiness may be the
result?

It is quite impossible to lay down universal rules
for the management of children; since those rules which would serve for
guidance in regulating the conduct of one child — would work the worst
results when applied to another. But we mention a few particular hints:

The grand secret in the management of children, is to
treat them as reasonable beings. We see that they are governed by hope,
fear, and love: these feelings, then, should be made the instruments
by which their education is conducted. Whenever it is possible (and it is
very rarely that it is not), a reason should be given for every
requirement, and a motive for undertaking any task. This would
lead the child to see that nothing was demanded out of caprice or whim, but
that it was a requirement involving their happiness, as well as their duty.

This method would also teach the child to reverence
and respect the parent. She would be regarded as possessed of
superior knowledge. Then the child would the more readily undertake demands
for which he could see no reason, from a knowledge that no commands of which
he understood the design were unreasonable.

The manner of managing children, should be one of
kindness, though marked by decision of character. An over-fondness
should never allow a mother to gratify her child in anything unreasonable;
and after having once refused a request — which she should not do hastily or
unadvisedly — no coaxing or tears should ever divert her from her purpose.
For if she gives way, the child will at once understand that he has a power
over his mother, and will resort to the same expedient whenever occasion may
require. And a worse evil than this is, that respect for the parent
will be lost, and the child, in place of yielding readily to her wishes,
will try the means of trick and evasion to elude them.

In order to really manage a child well — a mother should
become a child herself. She should enter into its hopes and fears, and share
its joys and sorrows. She should bend down her mind to that of her
offspring, so as to be pleased with all those trivial actions which give it
pleasure — and to sorrow over those which bring it pain. This would secure a
firm and ardent love, and at the same time lasting. For as a child advanced
in strength of intellect, so might the mother, until the child grew old
enough to understand the ties which bound them; and then, by making him a
friend, she would bind him to her for life.

There are none of the human race so sagacious and
keen-sighted as children! They seem to understand intuitively a person's
disposition, and they quickly notice any discrepanciesor
inconsistenciesof conduct. On this point should particular attention be
paid — that there be nothing practiced to cheat the child.
Underhand means are frequently resorted to, to persuade a child to
perform or abstain from some particular duty or object. But in a very short
time it will be found out, and the child has been taught a lesson in
deception which it will not fail to use when occasion requires.

And under this head might be included all that petty
species of deceit used towards children — whether to mislead
their apprehension, or to divert their attention. If anything is
improper for a child to know or do — better tell him so at once, than resort
to an underhand expedient. If a reason can be given for requiring the
abstinence; it should; but if not, tell the child that the reason is such
that he could not comprehend it, and he will remain satisfied. But if
trick or scheming is resorted to — the child will have learned
the two improper lessons of first being cunning, and then telling a
falsehood to avoid it.

Always
propose the highest and noblest motive — this will generally be a
motive which centers in God. Thus, in teaching a child to speak the
truth, it should be proposed not so much out of obedience to parents, as out
of obedience to God. And in all requirements, the love and fear of
God should be prominently set forth.

A child is born with feelings of religion; and if these
feelings are properly called forth, the actions will generally have a
tendency to good. Thus, with a child whose disposition is to deceive,
a mother has no hold upon such a one; for the child will soon perceive that
his mother cannot follow him everywhere, and that he can commit many actions
of deceit with impunity. But, if you impress the child with the truth that a
Divine Being is watching these actions, and that though done with the
greatest cunning, they cannot be committed with impunity — and it is more
than probable that they will never be committed at all.

A temptation may be thrown in the way of such a
child, but the child will not be powerful enough to overcome the feeling
that the action is being watched. That child may eagerly pant to perform the
forbidden action, or to partake of the forbidden pleasure; but he will not
be able to rid himself of the feeling that it cannot be done without being
observed. He will stand in a state of anxiety, and steal a glance
around, in order to see the Being he feels is looking upon him, and every
breeze that murmurs — will be a voice to chide him, and every leaf
that whistles — will seem a footstep; and never will he be able to break
the restraint. For wherever he goes and whatever he does, he will feel that
his actions are watched by One who will punish the bad actions, and reward
the good actions.

And in the same way might this be applied to all
dispositions and feelings. How cheering is it to a timid child, to be told
that at no time is he left alone: but that the Divine Being who made
everything — preserves and keeps everything, and that nothing
can happen but by His permission! This is to disarm fear of its terrors, and
to implant a confidence in the mind, for the child will feel that while his
actions are good, he is under the protection of an Almighty Parent.

In the same way, in stimulating a child to the
performance of a duty — the motive and end proposed, should be
the favor of God. This would insure the duty being entered upon with
a right spirit — not merely for the sake of show and effect, but springing
from the heart — and, at the same time, it would prevent anything of
hypocrisy. If it were only the estimation of the world which was to
be regarded, a child could soon understand that the applause would be gained
by the mere exterior performance — be the heart motive whatever it
might be. But when the motive is centered in God, it is readily understood
that the feeling must be genuine; otherwise, whatever the world may say, God
will look upon it as unworthy and base.

We believe it would be found to work the best results, if
all the actions of a child were made thus to depend upon their harmony with
the will of God; for it would give a sacredness to every action; make
every motive a high and holy one; and harmonize the thoughts of the
heart, with the actions of the life.

But in this mode of teaching, it is absolutely necessary
that a mother should herself be an example of the truth she teaches.
It will be worse than useless, to teach a child that God is always at hand,
'and sees all our ways,' if she acts as though she did not believe in the
existence of God.

In the same way, it will be vain to teach a child that
lying is a great crime in God's sight, when a mother in her own words
shows no regard to truth; and equally so of all other passions and feelings.
It is idle to teach a child that pride — hatred — revenge — anger, are
sinful passions — if a mother's own conduct displays any of them. How
useless is it to teach that vanity should never be indulged in — when
a mother delights in ostentation and display! Such instruction
as this, is like the web of Penelope — unraveled as fast as done.

Previously to becoming a teacher, a mother should learn
this hardest of all lessons — 'Know yourself.' Without this, the
instruction she gives to her children will at best prove very imperfect. It is
quite useless to teach children to reverence anything, when a mother's
conduct shows that, practically at least, she has no belief in the
truths she inculcates. And a very hard requirement this is: but it is a
requirement absolutely necessary, if the child's education is meant to be
anything more than nominal. The finest lesson on the beauty
of truth — must be enforced by a mother never herself saying what is
false; for children pay great regard to consistency, and very soon
detect any discrepancies between that which is taught — and that
which is practiced.

The best method of inculcating truth on the minds
of children, is by analogy and illustration. They cannot
follow a logical argument, though they readily understand an illustration.
And, by a judicious arrangement, everything, either animate or inanimate,
might be made to become a teacher.

What lesson on industry would be so likely to be
instructive as that gathered from a bee-hive? The longest dissertation on the evils of idleness,
and the advantages of industry, would not prove half so beneficial as
directing the observation to the movements of the bee — that ever-active
insect, which, without the aid of reason, exercises prudence and foresight,
and provides for the needs of winter. A child will readily understand
such instruction as this, and will blush to be found spending precious hours
in idleness.

And in the same way with all other duties, whether to God
or mankind — the birds of the air and the flowers of the field
might be made profitable teachers — and the child would, wherever he went,
be surrounded with instruction.

This mode of teaching has this special recommendation —
it raises up no evil passions: and a child which would display an evil
temper by being reproved in words — will feel no such rancor at a lesson
being inculcated in a way like this.

This instruction will also be much longer remembered
than one delivered in words, forasmuch as the object upon which the
instruction is based, would be continually presented to the eye.

And, we believe, almost all duties might be inculcated in
this same manner. Thus, humility by the violet, patience by the
spider, affection by the dove, love to parents by the stork —
all might be rendered teachers, and in a way never to be forgotten. And that
this mode of teaching is the best, we have the example of Christ himself,
who almost invariably enforced his instructions by an allusion to some
created thing. What, for instance, was so likely to teach men dependence
upon God, as a reference to the 'birds and the lilies,' which, without the
aid of reason, had their needs cared for? And in the same way with children
— what is so likely to teach them their duties, as a reference to the varied
things in nature, with whose uses and habits they are well acquainted?

God should be the object upon which the
child's thoughts are taught to dwell — for the minds even of children turn
to the beautiful, and the beautiful is the Divine. All thoughts and actions
should be raised to this standard. The child would then rise above the
feelings of self-gratification, and vanity, and the panting for applause —
to the favor and love of God. Thus should religion be the great and
the first thing taught. And a mother should be careful that neither
in her own actions, nor in the motives she holds out to her
children — should there be anything hypocritical, or contrary to Scripture.
And by this course, the best and happiest results may be expected to follow.

The perverse and headstrong passions of the human heart
are so many, that numerous instructions may seem to be useless, and a
mother may have often to sigh over her child as she sees him allowing evil
habits to obtain the mastery, or sinful dispositions to reign in his heart.
But, as we have before said, we do not think that the instruction will be
lost, but that a time will come when she will reap the fruits of her toil,
care, and concern.

Such then is the duty of a mother — to tend and
watch over the needs of her child, to guard it in health, to nurse it
in sickness, to be solicitous for it in all the changes of life; and to
prevent, as much as possible, those many evils to which flesh is heir from
assailing her fondly cherished offspring.

It is also her province to instruct her children in those
duties which will fall to their lot, both as reasonable and as immortal
creatures. And by so doing she will make her own life happy — leave to her
children a happy heritage on earth, and a prospect of a higher one in
Heaven. But if a mother neglects her duty, she will reap the fruits of her
own negligence, in the ingratitude of her children — an ingratitude
which will bring a double pain to her, from the thought that her own
neglect was the cause of its growth.

Mrs. Child, in her excellent "Mother's Book," a
volume which should be in the hands of every woman who has assumed the
responsibilities of a mother, gives some valuable suggestions on the subject
of governing children. I make a single extract and with it close my
present rambling work. She says:

Some children, from errors in early management, get
possessed with the idea that they may have everything. They even
pester for things it would be impossible to give them. A child properly
managed, will seldom ask twice for what you have once told him he should not
have. But if you have the care of one who has acquired this habit, the best
way to cure him of it is never to give him what he asks for, whether his
request is proper or not; but at the same time be careful to give him such
things as he likes, (provided they are proper for him,) when he does not ask
for them. This will soon break him of the habit of pestering.

I cannot say too much in praise of gentleness. Its
effects are beyond calculation, both on the affections and the
understanding. The victims of oppression and abuse are
generally callous, as well as selfish and hard-hearted. How can we wonder at
it? They are all the time incited to evil passions, and nobody encourages
what is good in them. We might as well expect flowers to grow amid
the snow and ice of winter!

But gentleness, as important as it is, is not all
that is required in education. There should be firmness united with
it — great firmness. Commands should be reasonable, and given in perfect
kindness; but once given, it should be known that they must be
obeyed.

I heard a lady once say, 'For my part, I cannot be so
very strict with my children. I love them too much to punish them
every time they disobey me.'

I will relate a scene which took place in her family. She
had but one servant, and at the time to which I allude, she was very busy
preparing for company. Her children knew by experience, that when she was in
a hurry, she would indulge them in anything for the sake of having
them out of the way.

George began, 'Mother, I want a piece of mince-pie.' The
answer was, 'It is nearly bed-time; and mince-pie will hurt you. You shall
have a piece of cake, if you will sit down and be still.' The boy ate his
cake; and liking the system of being hired to sit still, he soon
began again, 'Mother, I want a piece of mince-pie.' The old answer was
repeated. The child stood his ground, 'Mother, I want a piece of mince-pie —
I want a piece — I want a piece,' was repeated incessantly. 'Will you stop
pestering me, if I give you a piece?' 'Yes, I will — certainly.' A small
piece was given, and soon devoured.

With his mouth half full, he began again, 'I want
another piece — I want another piece.' 'No, George; I shall not
give you another mouthful. Go sit down, you naughty boy. You always act the
worst when I am going to have company.' George continued his pestering; and
at last said, 'If you don't give me another piece, I'll start shouting!'
This threat not being attended to, he kept his word. Upon this, the
mother seized him by the shoulder, shook him angrily, saying, 'Hold your
tongue, you naughty boy!' 'I will, if you will give me another piece
of pie,' said he. Another small piece was given him, after he had promised
that he certainly would not pester any more!

As soon as he had eaten it, he, of course, began again;
and with the additional threat, 'If you don't give me a piece, I will start
shouting after the company comes, so loud that they can all hear me!' The
end of all this was, that the boy had a sound whipping, was put to bed, and
could not sleep all night, because the mince-pie made his stomach ache!

What an accumulation of evils is in this little
scene! His health injured — his promises broken with impunity — his mother's
promises broken — the knowledge gained that he could always vex her when she
was in a hurry — and that he could gain what he would by pestering. He
always acted upon the same plan afterward; for he only once in a while (when
he made his mother very angry) got a whipping; but he was always sure
to obtain what he asked for, if he pestered her long enough.

His mother told him the plain truth, when she said the
mince-pie would hurt him; but he did not know whether it was the truth, or
whether she only said it to put him off; for he knew that she did sometimes
deceive. When she gave him the pie, he had reason to suppose it was
not true that it would hurt him — else why should a kind mother give it to
her child? Had she told him that if he asked a second time, she would put
him directly to bed — and had she kept her promise, in spite of entreaties —
she would have saved him a whipping, and herself a great deal of unnecessary
trouble. And who can calculate all the whippings, and all the trouble, she
would have spared herself and him? I do not remember ever being in her
house, without witnessing some scene of contention with the children.

Now let me introduce you to another acquaintance.
She was in precisely the same situation, having a comfortable income and one
servant; but her children were much more numerous, and she had had very
limited advantages for education. Yet she managed her family better than any
woman I ever saw, or ever expect to see again. I will relate a scene I
witnessed there, by way of contrast to the one I have just described.

Myself and several friends once entered her parlor
unexpectedly, just as the family were being seated at the supper table. A
little girl, about four years old, was obliged to be removed, to make room
for us. Her mother assured her she should have her supper in a little while,
if she was a good girl. The child cried; and the guests insisted that room
should be made for her at table. 'No,' said the mother; 'I have told her
that she must wait; and if she cries, I shall be obliged to send her to bed.
If she is a good little girl, she shall have her supper directly.' The child
could not make up her mind to obey; and her mother led her out of the room,
and gave orders that she should be put to bed without supper.

When my friend returned, her husband said, 'Hannah, that
was a hard case. The poor child lost her supper, and was agitated by the
presence of strangers. I could hardly keep from taking her on my knee, and
giving her some supper. Poor little thing! But I never will interfere
with your management; and much as it went against my feelings, I entirely
approve of what you have done.' 'It cost me a struggle,' replied his wife;
'but I know it is for the good of the child, to be taught that I mean
exactly what I say.'

This family was the most harmonious, affectionate, happy
family I ever knew. The children were managed as easily as a flock of lambs.
After a few unsuccessful attempts at disobedience, when very young —
they gave it up entirely; and always cheerfully acted from the conviction
that their mother knew best. This family was governed with great
strictness; yet firmness was united with gentleness.

But the indulgent mother above, who said she loved
her children too much to punish them — was actually obliged to punish them
ten times as much as the strict mother did!