Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

"... the uplift of the continents mid-way through Noah's Flood" (after150 days of flooding from 40 days of incessant rain covering thehighest mountains by over 20 feet of water, presumably). Really? Thereis no mention of any 'uplift' in Genesis. Or are you referring to Psalm104:8 in the NASB - but that might be referring to 'creation week' asdescribed in Genesis 1. Genesis implies that the floodwaters recededfrom the mountains because it had stopped raining, because of a 'wind',and because and the 'springs of the deep' and 'floodgates of heaven' hadbeen closed. Not because (in part) of any drastic worldwide 'uplift' ofwhat the NIV says were already 'high mountains'.

"In fact, it is only the receding waters of Noah's Flood that explainthese flat plateaus at high elevation." What about glaciers or volcanicactivity?

"This uplift was the last major uplift of the continents, which formedthe present-day mountains." Those mountains were there more than 5,000years ago. And huge ranges such as the Andes, the Alps and the Himalayado not all date from the same [typo corrected] single year in Earth's history.

"This water that remained trapped from the Flood would have containedlots of unusual chemicals and organic material that accumulated duringthe Flood, quite different in composition from the sort of environmentsthat are found today. The waters were also likely warmer than forsimilar lakes today." Evidence? And the lithium deposits in Bolivia arenot typical of what is found elsewhere as far as I know.

"Most wood and organic material found in Flood sediments gives 'ages'in this range." That proves nothing (you dispute the dates of '30,000to 42,000 years' anyhow). Carbon-14 dating cannot be used to ascertain,in cases where the animal or plant died longer ago than around 60,000years, how old organic material is likely to be. Besides (as well as noworldwide flood 4,500 years ago) there has been precisely no 'ice age'more recently than that date.

I also note that your receding 'worldwide' Noah's Flood convenientlynot only was accompanied in its latter stages by massive worldwide'uplift' - forming today's very highest mountains apparently - but atthe same time the draining floodwaters also then managed to carry out amassive amount of localised erosion in just several months to formthese flat Bolivian salt pans at high altitude (as well as the GrandCanyon etc). Presumably the erosion either all happened once the'uplift' had stopped - or (if the two happened concurrently at thishigh altitude) the 'uplift' did not prevent the simultaneous erosionfrom forming an almost perfectly flath surface (where shallowdepressions allowed lakes to form that later drained leaving behindunusual and valuable salt deposits)?"

PS Further message to CMI sent on 15 February (referring to the latest comments):

"http://creation.com/salar-de-uyuni-boliviaThe 'correction factor' is not real. You cannot demonstrate that it is. It is pseudo-science - motivated by fundamentalist religion. Falsification factor would be a more accurate term for what you are performing. I will now check my email to see to see whether my previous rebuttal has been acknowledged, let alone refuted, by anyone at CMI."

"http://creation.com/evolutionary-programmingIt is not 'indoctrination'. It is science education. You are anti-science. Yes - you DO lie about the age of the universe, spreading false information and propaganda. I don't need to be rude or abusive - just speak the truth about CMI. And your so-called 'biblical worldview' teachings go WAY beyond what the Bible actually teaches."

http://creation.com/proclaiming-creationBiblical creation is a myth and a lie. And perhaps there is NO God out there rather than a bad God who also pretends NOT to exist. So no Christian utopia either. And just an appearance of 'design'."We must dispel any notion that this defence of an historical Genesis (by an acknowledged minority of today’s Christians) is akin to Custer’s Last Stand —a sort of forlorn hope in the teeth of the evidence from the sciences." But you can't. Or else you would have done so. Science shows our history. Genesis is mythology. The worldwide flood is total fiction. "Moreover, with the easy access to information via the Internet, the fatal flaws in this great delusion of our age are being exposed. An excellent source of such information was compiled during CMI’s Evolution’s Achilles’ Heels project." Which is a PACK of LIES.You are backing the wrong horse.