It shows that Guccifer 2.0's "Russian Fingerprints" were actually fabricated in a methodical, sequential, 2-stage process that certainly was not indicative of any accidental 'tainting' of the files.

Further information provided also indicates where Guccifer 2.0's first files were more likely to have been created and who is really likely to have been behind the Guccifer 2.0 operation.

To date, nobody in the USIC, MSM, Congress or the Senate have raised the evidence presented on the http://g-2.space web site and yet it is legitimate and even verifiable.

Please could you confirm receipt of this email (if not automatically provided by your contact form system)

The one exception was the message to Luther Strange separately 2 days ago, where I mentioned that Guccifer 2.0 was an effort to discredit Wikileaks preemptively.

With the exception of 2-3 individuals, half have given no response at all and the other half have only provided automated responses. Of the few that did provide a response beyond the automated receipt notification, all but one appeared to ignore the evidence being raised and responded with a cookie-cutter response (and so I've retained "auto" as the status for this because what they have sent does not constitute a proper, coherent response to the issue being raised).

Of course, I will now proceed to try to contact all of the unresponsive senators in a less subtle manner, however, there is only so much I can hope to achieve alone. I've tried to reach out to every senator and will persist but it's fair to assume that many will care little for communications from someone outside of their state and especially from outside the country. - So, I'm calling on all who are willing, to contact your Senators and make sure they acknowledge and respond to the new evidence. - I think mentioning that Guccifer 2.0 was an effort to preemptively smear Wikileaks before they had a chance to verify and publish the DNC Leaks may also be important to include.

Why Contact The Whole Senate?

This is necessary so that senators outside of the intelligence and judiciary committees know that there are questions that should be asked by their colleagues and so that those colleagues inside such committees are encouraged to challenge the flawed intel provided in the DHS/ODNI assessments released on January 6th, which has been repeatedly referenced by USIC leaders when they are questioned about the attribution to Russian intelligence agencies.

Those that had auto-responders thanking me for contacting them about something I did not contact them for:

Lindsey Graham

Rob Portman

Those that didn't acknowledge what I was contacting them for but had an auto-responder that pushed the mainstream narrative at me:

John Cornyn

Bob Casey Jr

Ron Wyden

Thom Tillis

Todd Young

Those that have responded with a genuine response to my communications so far: