Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swfMax filesize is 8 MB.Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.You may upload 5 per post.You may roll dice on this board, type "dice XdY+Z" in the email field where X is number of dice, Y is max roll and Z is modifier.

AS LONG AS WE DON'T GIVE UP ON EMAILING AND PUSH FORTH WITH #OPLOVENET AND THE #REBUILDINIATIVE YOU WILL SEE SJW MELTDOWNS LIKE THIS 100FOLD TILL THE END OF TIME! JUST IMAGINE MCINTOSH, DEVI, THE MSM AND THE LW CREW'S REACTIONS!

>>1409690well, that's easy. point to any one #gger who's a member of a minority group>but muh sockpuppet>but muh internalized misogyny/racism>but muh you don't represent #gg and have just been tricked by #gg into doing what they want

>>1409681>implying obongo had any power throughout his presidency>implying people didn't just vote for him because he was seemingly the lesser of two evils>implying the failings of the obama administration aren't because of the bizarre deterioration of the democratic party in the past decade

>>1409780That is what First Past the Post gets you. Single best thing the US could do is change to approval voting.>get list of candidates>check off the ones you'd be ok with winning>write in anyone else you'd like to win>eligible candidate with highest approval rating winsThen we can get rid of the ""2"" party system.

>>1409803Head animator definitely is. I recall someone claiming in a way older thread that another artist was too, that they were bitching on their tumblr about being on the Gamergate recommends stream curator page, which is funny as hell if true.

>>1409779No he hasn't. He's solicited donations from Ghazi and then edited related pages, but he hasn't admitted to getting money "to edit" the page. In fact he has outright denied it and made up bullshit about also soliciting donations in pro-GG subreddits. Why are you spreading misinformation when the reality is nearly as bad?

>>1409842>But she doesn't entirely agree with the bullshit anti is peddling.

Yes she does Creeos. I've been following her for a while. She fully bought into the harassment narrative. Tweeting shit like "sure is a scary time to be a lady in videogames" and "i wonder how i'll die" in reference to "death threats"

>>1409762Probably not, because enforcing anything like that would be essentially impossible and cause a massive legal shitstorm. The NSA monitoring has been used for private cases like major drug busts in what's called "parallel construction", where they use information from the mass warrantless wiretapping and then invent a different way to get the information or fabricate probably cause for a warrant so that they can use it in court. However they haven't completely thrown the 4th amendment to the wind and used it in private cases without that bullshit yet, especially not in mass-cases that would affect more than a small number of people.

Repeating what I said in the last delicious bread (thank you kind soul for this new, baked bread):

We will win simply by fucking existing and using the same spaces that they use. We don't even need to fucking DO anything if it came down to it.

Think about it. In their mind, anything that goes against their "moral" code is inherently evil, and anything that supports it or is associated with it is evil. Well, if that's true, and if Hotwheels ("morally" evil person) is allowed on Patreon (the supporter), then they themselves must be evil (associated via Patreon).

Because they become associated with the evil (and go against their crazy code), then two things have to happen: Either 1. They have to somehow remove the evil from what they are using (Patreon, gaming, twitter, whatever the fuck else they are held up in). If 1 does not work, then the only logical solution to the problem is 2. Remove themselves from wherever the evil entity is.

As long as people can nut up and say "fuck off" to whoever comes calling to bitch/whine/complain, then they will have NO CHOICE but to leave. If not, then they will kill each other over who is the least SJW of them all, and they will be too busy fighting each other to stop us. In the meantime, all the in-fighting will be shown upon EVERYONE to see how fucking stupid and insane they truly are.

Just exist. That's all you have to do to win against these simple fucks.

>>1409887I'll thank Kotaku when they>establish a code of ethics requiring such disclosures>follow up with it by putting disclosures on every article>discipline anyone who violates the disclosures>fires the people who already have been proven to be unethical>stop writing clickbait shit >apologize for being 100% wrong about GG

Oh but wait, they're a Gawker subsidiary. Burn them to the fucking ground.

I'm arguing with a fellow on twitter right now, and he wanted to see proof that potential harrassers of Zoe Quinn where shouted down immediately back on 4chan. I need a link to an archive or a screengrab of an old #GG thread asap.

Thank you for your email of Nov.14 addressed to Esther Enkin, CBC Ombudsman, drawing our attention to what you see as a “very lazy and one-sided” CBC News story that “slandered” #GamerGate. Moreover, you wrote that the report also “slandered” journalist David Pakman, among others, by calling them “’harassers of women’”. Although wrote that you were not sure where this story was broadcast, I expect you are referring to a report on the Nov. 13 editions of THE NATIONAL.

I fully understand that gamers are angry and frustrated at media coverage that too often appears to misunderstand #GamerGate, tarnishing what they feel should be seen as a noble cause with allegations of abuse and harassment. While it may have started as a well-defined topic, as with most hashtags, this one too has morphed and changed. #GamerGate now has multiple aspects, among them, certainly, ethics in game journalism. The treatment of women in gaming is another. Both are important.

I also appreciate that #GamerGate is the subject of continuing controversy, if not contention among gamers and others. But as interesting as the multiple issues it raises are – and they are very interesting – this report wasn’t really about #GamerGate at all, although it was mentioned at one point almost as an aside. (The tag also flashed for a few seconds as a superimposed title in the report under a video clip of game commentator Anita Sarkeesian. There is a relationship, of course, but we didn’t explain what it was and shouldn’t have used the #GamerGate tag so broadly).

The report was prepared by Deana Sumanac-Johnson in Montreal, one of the biggest gaming centres in North America, during Gamerella, a 48-hour marathon for aspiring game developers. The organizers’ focus, the report said, was to make female gamers feel comfortable and safe enough to create.

To illustrate the kind of abuse some women have experienced, Ms. Sumanac-Johnson included a couple of examples – Anita Sarkeesian and Gersande La Fleche. Ms. La Fleche said she was attacked by online gamers using the #GamerGate hashtag. For viewers unfamiliar with it, the report then offered a two sentence explanation: “Initially a social media hashtag for the discussion of ethics in gaming journalism, it has increasingly become a catch phrase for the online harassment of female gamers”. In the following sentence, the report quoted a Concordia University researcher saying, “Game developers are a particular target”, which then took Ms. Sumanac-Johnson back to Gamerella. That was the only time #GamerGate was mentioned in the report

With respect to Mr. Pakman, I believe the report misrepresented him.

David Pakman wrote to CBC shortly after the broadcast – as he also explained in a YouTube video – to say he was offended because his image pops up when Ms. Sumanac-Johnson was talking about harassment, an association he said was unfair and untrue.

The next day, in a written response to Mr. Pakman, the reporter explained that his image, along with three others, appears directly in illustration of the phrase, "Initially a social media hashtag for discussion of ethics of gaming journalism…." She said she included him because he was one of the first to discuss the issue publicly, adding that the other people appearing in the four-person on-screen panel are likewise just discussing the merits of GamerGate, not broadcasting hateful or violent messages. She added that Mr. Pakman’s image disappears before the phrase "…it has increasingly become a catchphrase for the online harassment of female gamers" is said.

I should add that the reporter did not intend to suggest that Mr. Pakman supported any particular aspect of #GamerGate only that he had been a leader in bringing public attention to the issue.

While this report on THE NATIONAL merely touched on the subject, we are continuing to follow the #GamerGate story closely, especially its concern with journalistic ethics, and will watch for an opportunity to carry more on it in the coming weeks.

>>1410007She worked together and is friends with Anna Anthropy, who Hernandez promoted while they were living together, is at least friendly on twitter with Christina Love, who Hernandez promoted after they were romantically involved, and is apparently friends with a bunch of Gamasutra people. She isn't anti-GG because she's a SJW, she's anti-GG because she's pro-corruption - or at least pro her friends, and her friends are corrupt and virulently anti-gg because they have a personal stake in it.

She's part of the indie clique on a personal level, not someone unrelated drawn in by ideology. It's probably a lot easier to believe the narrative fed to you by your friends than to denounce your friends and get ostracized by your social circle.

>>1410153Who the fuck cares about Literally Who and why is it so important that you do someone else's work for them on the matter of her "harassment"? Also, don't be surprised when the proof gets outright ignored.

>>1410274Anti-vax is pretty popular.>>1410290>we learned how to trick our immune systems.No, we learned how to put out an APB on diseases.>Is it worth it to get vaccines for every bug that goes around? Injecting something into my bloodstream? I'd like to reserve that for emergencies. This is the flu, and there's always a flu.Over 1000 Americans die from the flu every year. You can avoid that with near 100% certainty by taking a fucking shot.>muh mercuryAt least he admits he doesn't know enough to talk about it.]

He's acting like he's just asking innocent questions to get people skeptical. The problem with the questions he's asking is that the answers exist. Pretending they don't is being anti-vax even if it's through ignorance.

>>1410491I wonder if I always judged Dent through the eyes of the corrupt media in the past. Either way his game always looked shit and he felt like a con artist, but no more than what seems to be industry standard these days.

>>1410508Why the fuck do we not have images like that which cover every single goddamn instance of corruption, collusion, and blacklisting? We've been collecting evidence for months with no one getting punished and people who still don't understand that corruption has been proven.

>>1410597So attach citations. You don't need a citation to every individual thing either, just to an article or site like gamergate.me that compiles the evidence. Plus even without citations, since it's specific allegations, someone attacking it because no citations can then be provided those citations.

>>1410614>never tries to gain approval from both controlling parties>makes assumptions and empty promises he can't back up without the approval of the second party he doesn't try to win over>his defenders cry because he can't get anything done due to those horrible conservatives

He's a shit diplomat and president. He can't plan for shit and is an embarrassment on all fronts.

But for me I was burned out because I'm starting to take care of myself and get my life together, and doing that with GG was hard at first.>tfw GamerGate showed me there's hope left in the world, that I can make a difference, that we're all pretty excellent people, and all I gotta do is change my perspective, stand up, and get shit done

>>1410646You do understand that there's absolutely no point in him asking Republicans for anything, right? I mean you've seen time and again how they'd rather watch us burn than let Obama get credit for anything, correct?

>>1410777>OH MY GOD THEY HACKED ALL OUR MAINFRAMES WITH VISUAL GUIS AND LEAKED INTERNAL DOCUMENTS>OH NO, AN ANONYMOUS THREAT ON THE INTERNET FROM TOTALLY-NOT-NORTH-KOREA THREATENING TO SHOOT UP OUR THEATERS>BETTER SHUT DOWN OUR CHRISTMAS MOVIE DEBUT THAT WE'VE SATURATED THE AIRWAVES WITH ADS FOR A WHOLE MONTH

And thus began the age of Internet terrorism because Sony was a chickenshit company who cost themselves millions of dollars in response to an non-credible threat on the Internet.

>>1410903>How exactly does Occupy violate the first amendment?I'm thinking they're talking about the violent reaction to people gathering in a park. Though, the feminists were entirely responsible for that reaction, since they were being assholes who caused public health hazards because "fuck you."

>>1410903I think it's more to do with the fact that there has been a "law enforcement" machine in place since the 60s to deal with exactly that sort of thing, and we got to see exactly how well it worked.

A national, vigorous, protest movement that was actually out and doing things was dismantled in a matter of days. You saw the state swooping in with their militarized thugs, beating, assaulting, oppressing, arresting peaceful protesters, drumming up false charges for their leaders and violent dispersing their followers. All the while you had the media talking heads blathering about how this tremendous movement that saw representatives from thousands of groups had "no plan" or "no goals" or whatever, when it was clear from the beginning that their one goal was removing the corrupting influence of money from politics.

Surprise–moneyed interests weren't interested in giving up their winning advantage.

>>1410965This poll a shit. The only ways for us to stop winning are to stop, or to actually start engaging in harassment and shit. Also, send emails, tweet, dig dirt, and post ITT to motivate and inform.

>>1410957It really reminds me of Mostly Harmless>“It comes from a very ancient democracy, you see…">"You mean, it comes from a world of lizards?">"No," said Ford, who by this time was a little more rational and coherent than he had been, having finally had the coffee forced down him, "nothing so simple. Nothing anything like so straightforward. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people.">"Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy.">"I did," said Ford. "It is.">"So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't people get rid of the lizards?">"It honestly doesn't occur to them," said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates to the government they want.">"You mean they actually vote for the lizards?">"Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course.">"But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?">"Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in.

What if this was a false flag to make sure that even if people found out about HR4681, that it could get in?> Fund and push for a movie you know will piss off someone.> Use government agents to hack the movie makers. > Blame incident on the guy you've hyped as "shrouded in mystery" and shit.> Put in legislation to tighten movement online however you want.

Its a combination of general apathy and the ever rising tide of stupidity in america. Most people don't know about the bill, nor do they care, they don't know what a giant violation of privacy this is because institutions and everything else keep them ignorant compliant.

People made a huge stink about SOPA, they learned their lesson, every horrible anti anything law they want to pass will be done so quietly because at the end of the day, no senator is going to vote against stuff to protect our freedumbs.

Ok, keep telling yourself that. Maybe if your fucking hero actually tried shit would get done? Nope, instead he acts like a pubescent teenager and makes declarations and premature promises without consulting the other side. Of course people get pissed when they're not consulted first.

Maybe if he made his cabinet up of people who weren't a personal hugbox? Maybe some fucking advisers from other sides of the coin (you know, like a fucking DIPLOMAT is supposed to do).

>>1411065GamerGate is waking people up to the media's lies in general. This awareness can only spread. It's inevitable now that people are going to get similarly upset at the government and redpilling each other. It's an RPG and we're still in the early game. Game Journos are the low-level enemies we're using to learn the mechanics of psy-ops and level up our skills. GG is a consumer revolt, but the ramifications are much more far-reaching than just that.

Sony made a movie called the interview about a possible assassination ploy on kin jung what's his name, Sony got hit with a MASSIVE hack awhile ago that leaked tons of documents out and the FBI's investigation revealed that it was backed by quite a lot of money.

They demanded that the movie not be shown and name dropped 9-11 so Sony pulled it and probably won't release it which just goes to show, terrorism does work as long as you do it to corporations.

And by Sony doing this they just started the biggest goddamn fire ever regarding any sort of creativity or freedom of expression, because now extremists know they can push out shit they don't like by being forceful enough.