FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?TradCatKnight- MOST VIEWED & FOLLOWEDTraditional Catholic APOSTOLATE Worldwide!As Seen on:Gloria.tv, SpiritDaily, Shoebat, Canon212, VeteransToday, Beforeitsnews& many other notable websitesBOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!Welcome to my Nest.#EagleoftheFortress WEBSITE OWNERS: Don't Forget To Add Us On Your Page!ALEXA- TOP 25K WEBSITE WORLDWIDE

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Dangers of Porn: Famed liberal novelist visited porn sets: what he saw left him in disbelief

Dangers of Porn: Famed liberal novelist visited porn sets: what he saw left him in disbelief

Warning: Sensitive Material

The assertion was a rather bold one: Pornography, the famed British
novelist Martin Amis told his interviewer, was going to “change human
nature.”

Jacob Weisberg of Slate.com was somewhat incredulous. “It’s quite a claim—that this is going to change human nature in some way?”
Amis was brusque and firm. “Oh, I think it will.” Like most men, he
explained, he has very little resistance to pornography, the impact of
which he thinks is “incalculable, and will change the nature of
sexuality from here on. One suspects that any child old enough to walk
will within a few months have access to it. I think it’s a great attack
on innocence, and I know from personal conversations with my children
that pornography determines the style of the whole operation. And since
that form is…misogynistic, I can’t believe that’s a good thing.”
Pornography is “widening the chasm between sex and love,” Amis informed a
sceptical-looking Weisberg. “Pornography must set itself against significance in sex.”

Amis is more correct than he himself probably realizes. Pornography is reshaping sexuality, as detailed in Dr. Norman Doidge’s fascinating work on the neuroplasticity of the brain. Children are
accessing pornography younger and younger—the average age of first
exposure is now nine—and it is serving as their sex education. That is
why, in later years, pornography will often determine the nature of
their sexual interactions, as Amis’s own children have told him. And of
course, pornography is horrifyingly misogynistic, much more so than it
was when Amis was young.

“I shudder to think what my
girls have certainly seen,” Amis wrote. “The effect of pornography on
sexual praxis—how does it bleed into that, I’m sure it does, I know it
does. ... Why does every sexual act end with something girls hate?”

It is interesting that Martin Amis, predominantly well known for
being the son of novelist Kingsley Amis, his own novels (for which he
has twice been listed for the Booker Prize), and his close relationship
with the late essayist Christopher Hitchens, has such a strong opinion
on pornography considering his age: He is 67 years old. Amis is also
known for both speaking and writing about what he considers to be the
essential nature of the Sexual Revolution, and the human misery that
preceded it. Despite that, he is overtly hostile to pornography.
Amis’s hatred for pornography seems to have begun when he traveled to
several porn sets in 2001 to interview members of the industry and
report on what was going on behind the scenes. He was shocked by what he
saw. “Features porno is much, much dirtier than it used to be,” he
wrote. “But Gonzo porn is gonzo: way out there. The new element is
violence.”

Gonzo, ten years later, is now mainstream porn—and as one porn
producer put it: “The future of American porn is pain.” Amis met this
ugly reality face to face. “Some girls are used in nine months or a
year,” one producer told him. “An 18-year-old, sweet young thing, signs
with an agency, makes five films in her first week. Five directors, five
actors, five times five: she gets phone calls. A hundred movies in four
months. She’s not a fresh face any more. He price slips and she stops
getting phone calls. Then it’s, ‘Okay, will you do anal? Will you do
gangbangs?’ Then they’re used up. They can’t even get a phone call. The
market forces of this industry use them up.”
“Using them up” seems like a good way to put it, and cuts to the heart of the problem. People are meant to be loved—things
are meant to be used. But that’s not the way porn works. Amis describes
speaking to Regan Star, who told him what being on a porn set was like:“I got the S*** kicked out of me,” she said. “I was told before
the video—and they said this very proudly, mind you—that in this line of
work most of the girls start crying because they’re hurting so bad…I
couldn’t breathe. I was being hit and choked. I was really upset, and
they didn’t stop. They kept filming. You can hear me say, “Turn
the…camera off,” and they kept going.”
It is scenes like this, Amis writes, that make his first instinct one
of protectiveness. The girls in porn, he noted with disgust, are just girls—and
one of them told him bluntly what they needed to survive in porn: “You
need damage in your past.” America is gobbling these girls up like the
products they’re presented as, and no one cares about the fact that
eventually, they get “used up.”
“American porno,” Amis noted, “is market-driven. We can see what the
above tells us about porno. But what does it tell us about America? And
if America is more like a world than a country, what does it tell us
about the world?” The answer, Amis is afraid, is nothing good. For
example: “Americans spend more on strip clubs than they spend on
theatre, opera, ballet, jazz and classical concerts combined.”
Porn, as Dr. Gail Dines often says, is the destroyer of culture.
It is also a destroyer of porn stars. “I have herpes,” Amis records
one girl telling him. “After you’ve been in the business for awhile, you
have herpes. Everyone has herpes.” It’s a little-known fact that
condoms do nothing to prevent herpes, and often, don’t even prevent HIV.
Amis notes that one male actor infected six girls before he was caught.
He was barely punished. They got a life sentence.
Amis’s conclusion after his encounters is blunt: “Porno, it seems, is
a parody of love. It therefore addresses itself to love’s opposites,
which are hate and death.” Hate and death, slowly spreading like a
virus. “I shudder to think what my girls have certainly seen,” he wrote
elsewhere. “The effect of pornography on sexual praxis—how does it bleed
into that, I’m sure it does, I know it does. My oldest daughter—I had
many candid conversations with her when she was in her twenties, about
how certain things were expected, just taken from pornography, which,
lest we forget, is a very misogynistic form. Why does every sexual act
end with something girls hate?”
The unfortunate answer to that question is that because increasingly,
that is what men want to see. The market forces heed only their own
carnivorous gods, and are no longer harnessed by any sense of social
morality. Amis admits this with startling candor: “As I sampled some
extreme productions on the VCR in my hotel room, I kept worrying about
something. I kept worrying that I’d like it. Porno services the
‘polymorphous perverse’: the near-infinite chaos of human desire. If you
harbour perversity, then sooner or later porno will identify it.” Or draw it out.
Or as so many men I speak with have revealed, conjure up demons they
never knew existed. Porn howls down the dark hallways of the mind, and
dark doors long locked and forgotten begin to rattle.
It is perhaps ironic that Martin Amis has celebrated the Sexual
Revolution—that historical cataclysm that blew sex out of the safe
harbor of marriage and cut it off from the lifeline purposes of unity
and procreation—throughout his writing. After all, as he told the Spectator, he despises the porn industry because of its insidious impact on human relationships:

I would say that it’s an attack on love and on significance in
relationships, significance in sex. Years and years ago, someone defined
pornography as a hatred of significance in sex. That’s what pornography
does. There’s not more talk about love in pornography than there is
about having babies, is there? It doesn’t come up. It’s as if you made
babies some other way, like sneezing at each other or something, but
certainly not with sex; that has nothing to do with it at all. And I
think that’s a big disconnection for human beings. It wouldn’t have
occurred to anyone 30 years ago that sex wasn’t connected with
reproduction. But now, the chasm between the two is huge.

Indeed it is. Pornography has normalized virtually every sex act,
poisoned the minds of men, and groomed women for sexual violence like
some horrifying cyber-pimp. It has spread hatred and death, and chewed
up and spat out thousands of young girls, leaving them broken and
shell-shocked. It has changed the very nature of human sexuality,
deforming it into something that even the first purchasers of Playboy
would not recognize. So obvious is this transformation that even an
aging member of the Sexual Revolution’s first wave, a man like Martin
Amis, can see that this poison is hurting his children.
Perhaps unlike Amis, we know what the antidote to this poison is. It
is the opposite of hatred and death, and it is a rejection of the Sexual
Revolution. It is a culture of love and life, and it is up to all of us
who must live in a society poisoned by pornographers to root out their
ideology, trash their products, and choose a different future. Amis’s
children were born into a world where pornography lurked beneath the
surface. Amis and many others have now exposed the danger—and it is our
task to fight it.

ALEXA RANK

Find The Rank Of Any Website

DAILY NEWS- Scroll Thru The Latest News

Archbishop Lefebvre

“This Second Vatican Council Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.”

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Archbishop Lefebvre

“And we have the precise conviction that this new rite of Mass expresses a new faith, a faith which is not ours, a faith which is not the Catholic Faith. This New Mass is a symbol, is an expression, is an image of a new faith, of a Modernist faith. ….Now it is evident that the new rite, if I may say so, supposes another conception of the Catholic religion-another religion.”

TRADCATKNIGHT FORUM

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON TUMBLR!

TCK Facebook

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON PINTEREST

Archbishop Lefebvre

That Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church, because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship, all already condemned by the Church in many a document, official and definitive.... The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church...

Fr. Hesse Summary on Vatican II

Vatican II = Heretical & Schismatic

Exposing Vatican II & New Mass, Fr. Villa

Archbishop Lefebvre

“Well, we are not of this religion. We do not accept this new religion. We are of the religion of all time; we are of the Catholic religion. We are not of this 'universal religion' as they call it today-this is not the Catholic religion any more. We are not of this Liberal, Modernist religion which has its own worship, its own priests, its own faith, its own catechisms, its own Bible, the 'ecumenical Bible'-these things we do not accept."

Traditional Quotes & Prayers

The Real 3rd Secret of Fatima

Inlcudes Vatican II and the soon Apostate Church..."...because Fatima is a very apocalyptic message. It says that no matter what happens there are going to be terrible wars, there are going to be diseases, whole nations are going to be wiped out, there are going to be 3 days darkness, there are going to be epidemics that will wipe out whole nations overnight, parts of the earth will be washed away at sea and violent tornadoes and storms. It's not a nice message at all." Fr Malachi Martin

SSPX Marian Corps Donations

Marian Corps-Australasia

Fr. Chazal

Fr. Girouard

Or send a cheque made out to Fr. Patrick Girouard at : P.O.Box 1543, Aldergrove, BC, V4W 2V1, Canada.

St. Marcel Initiative

Or, if you prefer, in the U.S., make your contribution by telephone, toll free: 855-4-S. Marcel (855.476.2723), or internationally, by sending your donation directly to donations@stmarcelinitiative.com via PayPal.

TCK TESTIMONIALS

Eric Gajewski, Founder of DefeatModernism(formerly known as Defeat the Heresies)

Resistance Forum

True Traditionalist Forum

Pope XII: “Suicide Of Altering the Faith In Her Liturgy…..”

"I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past."A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, 'Where have they taken Him?'"

Signup To Google+. Then Youtube Then Begin Interacting! Click the Pic Above!

Current Crusaders Online Worldwide (RealTime)

St. Bernard:

Go forth confidently then, you knights, and repel the foes of the cross of Christ with a stalwart heart. Know that neither death nor life can separate you from the love of God which is in Jesus Christ, and in every peril repeat, "Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's." What a glory to return in victory from such a battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! Rejoice, brave athlete, if you live and conquer in the Lord; but glory and exult even more if you die and join your Lord. Life indeed is a fruitful thing and victory is glorious, but a holy death is more important than either. If they are blessed who die in the Lord, how much more are they who die for the Lord!

How secure, I say, is life when death is anticipated without fear; or rather when it is desired with feeling and embraced with reverence! How holy and secure this knighthood and how entirely free of the double risk run by those men who fight not for Christ! Whenever you go forth, O worldly warrior, you must fear lest the bodily death of your foe should mean your own spiritual death, or lest perhaps your body and soul together should be slain by him.

Indeed, danger or victory for a Christian depends on the dispositions of his heart and not on the fortunes of war. If he fights for a good reason, the issue of his fight can never be evil; and likewise the results can never be considered good if the reason were evil and the intentions perverse. If you happen to be killed while you are seeking only to kill another, you die a murderer. If you succeed, and by your will to overcome and to conquer you perchance kill a man, you live a murderer. Now it will not do to be a murderer, living or dead, victorious or vanquished. What an unhappy victory--to have conquered a man while yielding to vice, and to indulge in an empty glory at his fall when wrath and pride have gotten the better of you!

But what of those who kill neither in the heat of revenge nor in the swelling of pride, but simply in order to save themselves? Even this sort of victory I would not call good, since bodily death is really a lesser evil than spiritual death. The soul need not die when the body does. No, it is the soul which sins that shall die.

The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes, and serves himself when he falls. Neither does he bear the sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he is not a mankiller, but, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ towards evildoers and he is rightly considered a defender of Christians. Should he be killed himself, we know that he has not perished, but has come safely into port.

Once he finds himself in the thick of battle, this knight sets aside his previous gentleness, as if to say, "Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord; am I not disgusted with your enemies?" These men at once fall violently upon the foe, regarding them as so many sheep. No matter how outnumbered they are, they never regard these as fierce barbarians or as awe-inspiring hordes. Nor do they presume on their own strength, but trust in the Lord of armies to grant them the victory.

.

.

Saint Athanasius

"May God console you! ... What saddens you ... is the fact that others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises – but you have the Apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith?The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith? True, the premises are good when the Apostolic Faith is preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way ..."You are the ones who are happy; you who remain within the Church by your Faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has come down to you from Apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis. No one, ever, will prevail against your Faith, beloved Brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day. "Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray. Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ."