Talk:Dragon

Dragon is a failed featured article nomination, which means it has been identified as lacking in key areas and not up to the standard of quality required by the Harry Potter Wiki community to be a featured article. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute.

Should we make articles for each of the dragon varieties and move the information for each dragon into an article about its species? - Scrimgeour

I dont think so. There is not alot of info on each individual species to have a good sized thread. They would all be stubs.
-Lemniwinks

I think that they all should have maybe a bit of a 'teaser' on the main page, and then on the 'stub' be explained in greater detail.--AngelicDemon92 19:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

If you'll look at the article, you'll see that I'm in the process of doing that. Although there isn't enough info for a teaser and an article. I'm updating the descriptions from Fantastic Beasts

Is anyone going to create a page for 1709 Warlocks Convention and for the book "From Egg to Inferno, A Dragons Keeper Guild" ? if not then why have broken links in the article to them? The Unbeholden 16:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Found the article, fixed the link. its called "From Egg to Inferno: a Dragon-Keeper's Guide", is there enough information to create a page for the Warlocks Convention? I remember reading about it, and theres I think enough information for a article The Unbeholden 17:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove redlinks from articles to pages that haven't been created yet. Someone will create the page eventually - a redlink tells people that the page is needed. Removing it only causes confusion. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 08:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

The Dragon medler

Sombody has put LOADS of voilting to this page, can sombody figure out how to reverse it? ARCWorker 16:10, July 17, 2011 (UTC)