On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain
> whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why
> this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build.
>
> Other packages have build-dependencies on snacc (I originally just
> wanted to compile kismet on amd64)...
Sorry for the late reply: The reason for the delay is that snacc
is orphaned and neither the to-be maintainer, Martin von Loewis
<martin@v.loewis.de>, nor the ex-maintainer (me) seem to have
much time. Now we have to wait for the Big C++ ABI Bang anyway,
so don't expect any action before that smoke evaporated.
Cheers, WB