The below email ballot
closes 2PMedt 03Sept 2004. The tentative tally for the
below motion is

06 Approve02 Disapprove07 Did Not
Vote00 Abstains

I suggest that Bob Grow's and Bob O'Hara's
comments be endorsed as friendly ammendments by the mover/seconder
(Carl/Mat).

If the mover/seconder agree to adopt the
comments as friendly ammendments, I further propose we delay the ballot close
until 2PM 10 September 2004 to give the EC members to consider the
ammendments and have an opportunity to change their votes.

Please verify your vote, if I did not
record it correctly below, send me a correction note.

1. The release confuses clear IEEE 802 branding. It
should not include any abbreviations that will confuse our standards customers
between organizational groups and standards projects. I find "task
group 802.11T" and "IEEE 802.11t Task Group" as confusing. While some
of us identify our subgroups with the project name, I don't believe that is the
case here. The project is P802.11.2 and the group driving the project is
IEEE 802.11 TG-T (or pick some other abbreviation that isn't like the name of a
project).

2. Inconsistent placement of "P". Early on, it is properly
located (IEEE P802.11.2) but toward the end it is improperly located (PIEEE
802.11.2). Correct the instances of the latter.

3. I believe the circle R is improperly used near the bottom of the
release. The committee is not a product, it is a group of people and
registration marks are only applied to products. I note that marks are not
applied to IEEE Computer Society and IEEE Standards Associations, we are no
different!

Bob O'Hara comments:

Disapprove.

I support all of Bob
Grow's comments on what is wrong with this press release, except for the use of
802.11t as the task group name. The occurrence of "802.11T" should be
replaced with "802.11t". I also agree with the comment made by Carl
Stevenson, as well, striking out specific text.

I will make the motion if the deletion marked by "strikeout"
in theattached version is adopted.

I think the "and inherently
unstable" language could give an unfavorableimpression in the press that
would not be good for 802.11.

I think it's sufficient to say "dynamic"
and leave it at that.

Regards,Carl

> -----Original
Message-----> From: <A ---------- This email is sent from the
802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.