We can include those MP’s that stood and chose not to side with Mr. Holland and voted not to kill Bill C-391.

The list of leaders isn’t complete without the person that leads Canadians, Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

_____________________________________________

From the “Mark Holland is NOT a leader” link:

“…Putting aside rights and freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism is dangerous, said Liberal public safety critic Mark Holland.

“When that happens, you risk doing serious damage to the things that supposedly democracies are all about,” he said.

“And that’s the right not to be unfairly accused or detained, or have your name destroyed without the opportunity of protecting yourself.” …”

When I read the above quote? I am compelled to point out that Mr. Holland’s disruptive behaviour and assorted antics when MP Garry Breitkreuz was chairing SECU C-391 hearings/meetings (I’ll toss in the Maria Mouraini hysterics, during a hearing, with a picture of and subsequent haranguing of Professor Gary Mauser and the later repeating of the drama on the floor of the House during her remarks prior to the September 22 motion vote, which was a flagrant violation of House rules).

Mr Holland and friends convieniently ignore the “self-defense” solution against the best interests of women. That “NOT a leader” leadership keeps women as victims and denies them the ability to empower themselves. I’m confident the “victim industry” in Canada is grateful and suitably expresses that gratitude when needed by him. CFUW gets involved and their reps will speak out.

Mr. Holland claims to be a leader. From the “He does NOT lead by example” link above? We see he talks out both sides of his mouth and practices censorship of private citizen’s dissenting commentary. A rather self-serving style. No?