Winner of League 'Zero' will face winner of League 'Ninja'. The winner will be determined by overall point totals for the entire season, including playoff points. If there's a tie, I shoot the owner of both leagues in the face.

PackersHome Zero can hold up to 12 members. If this is exceeded we will then add to PackersHome Ninja. Each league will have an even amount of participants.

No changes will be made to the rules, scoring or transactions after September 6th, 2010.

PM me the email address you used and I'll send you an invite. Yes, I'm asking you to PM me. ;)

After you are logged in, you can click the "Draft" tab on the far right and click the "Rank" link to rank your players in case you miss the draft. I suggest doing this regardless if you able to attend.

I've been playing around on FleaFlicker for sometime now and I think it's smooth, easy GUI and I think you'll like it too.

Please share any thoughts or concerns with the rules, transaction settings or scoring.

im out I wont play in a league with 24 teams makes for a very boring league and alot of non activity. Sorry guys we had 2 leagues last year and by 1/2 way thru the year we only had like 5 active players in one league and like 3 in the other

im out I wont play in a league with 24 teams makes for a very boring league and alot of non activity. Sorry guys we had 2 leagues last year and by 1/2 way thru the year we only had like 5 active players in one league and like 3 in the other

24 teams is the most it would be. If we have a total of 28 teams between the leagues, then it'll be 14 team one league, 14 team another league.

I'm expecting 12-14 for a league.

The concept is what is being thrown down for a vote. Two leagues, one champion. Similar to how the NFL operates. There's a AFC Champ, NFC Champ and then the World Champ.

I would put the max qb and def. at 1, then an owner would have to make a decision when the bye week came for their qb and D whether to play without or release them with the chance of another team pickng the player up.This way if a QB goes down ith injury there would always be players out there to replace the injury.

Just a suggestion.

I am editing this after reading the whole thread, if there are more than 16 teams in each league, I would strongly suggest max of 1 qb and 1 D.

I would probably play, although I've never been a fan of bigger leagues. As Hazer says it leads to inactivity because a few teams have mostly low profile players and can't hardly get any good players for the rest of the year. Just creates minimal interest in my past experience.

It will end up a few teams seriously playing, especially considering those guaranteed few teams that miss the draft, lol

I've no interest in playing in a league where we're limited to one QB, and I find leagues where I can't customize my defense boring. I don't understand why in most fantasy leagues, it's all about offense, and defense is tacked on as an afterthought. I find the strategy and nuances of defense just as interesting as offense. I want to be able to choose my DL, LBs, CBs, Ss, etc. I don't want to put all my eggs in one team's basket. If someone gets the Steelers' D, they might dominate all year, while I am left with the Cardinals' D and suck the entire year. It's more fair to let everyone pick and choose from among the best players available.

Ive been playing Fantasy football since 2000 and I have found the best leagues consist of 8 teams, more than that you end up with alot of people not paying attention or just not caring. I really don't see you getting 24 guys to stay active. Like I stated we had what between 2 leagues last year maybe 10 guys stay active.

But thats just me from my experience, granted i won the huge league last year but thats because I was drafting backup players that happen to become starters. But there was no fun in it because there was no waiver because everyone was drafted.

Confusing? How is it confusing? Why are you underestimating the intelligence of the people who frequent this board? We have some great football minds on this board. If confusion is the issue, why are there no leagues in which you select a team offense and choose your defensive players? No, the reality is that offense is considered sexier than defense, so that is what these leagues cater to.

Obviously, set this up how you want to -- it's your league. To each his own. That's what makes this game great. I just personally have no interest in being stuck with a bad defense whose deficiencies I can't mitigate by choosing from among the best players available. Particularly since you're talking about limiting D and QB to one roster slot, meaning I have to bench or cut them on their bye weeks.

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.