Charlie Hebdo and the Poison for Europe’s Soul

During the night of January 7, tens of thousands of French citizens took to the streets in several cities to pay homage to the twelve people who were gunned down earlier that day in Paris.

Most of the victims, who included four leading cartoonists, worked for the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. The left-wing publication had been at the forefront in publishing cartoons. It spared no religion or creed.

Charlie Hebdo’s offices had already been attacked in 2011. The magazine’s provocative depiction of the prophet Muhammad enraged those who believed that the press had no right to publish such images. The latest shooting should encourage European governments to protect press freedom and other civil liberties, not restrict them.

The January 7 attack on Charlie Hebdo coincides with growing anti-Islam movements across Europe. The most recent group to be spawned is in Germany. There, an organization called Pegida (Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West) is attempting—although it would deny it—to sow hatred against immigrants and refugees, mostly Muslims who are fleeing the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, and Libya.

In the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attack, the worry now is that the leaders of these anti-Islam and populist movements will use the murders of the cartoonists to justify their propaganda. Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s National Front party, has called for a referendum on reintroducing the death penalty.

The danger too is that Muslims, whether European citizens or not, will become the target of such Islamophobia. Alexander Gauland, the vice chairman of Germany’s populist, right-wing, Euroskeptic Alternative for Germany party, said the attacks on Charlie Hebdo justified the anti-Islam protests. “All of those people who have ignored or derided people’s concerns of the imminent danger posed by Islamism have been proved wrong by this bloody deed,” he said.

Some government leaders, but not nearly enough, have already spoken out loudly against attempts to incite hatred and racism.

Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has not hidden her disgust for such populism and nasty rhetoric. She has taken a tough stand against Pegida. And as soon as she heard about the attack on Charlie Hebdo, she made no bones about the need for Europe to further defend, not weaken, its values. Those values, she said, are universal. No doubt, authoritarian regimes and the Islamic State would—and indeed do—challenge that assumption.

Freedom of the press is inextricably tied to universal values and is not an exclusively Western liberty. To curb that freedom now, and for anti-Islam movements at the same time to use the attacks on Charlie Hebdo to incite hatred against Muslims, would undermine the civil liberties and tolerance espoused by the West.

Such steps would also undermine the efforts of advocates of human rights in nondemocratic countries or in states where such rights are under increasing threat, such as Turkey and Russia. Yet however much authoritarian regimes or fundamentalists believe that the West’s values are poison, European governments must resist the temptation that they themselves poison those values.

The reaction by any government after such an attack as happened in Paris is to increase security. French President François Hollande has put his country on attack alert. His duty, as he said soon after the murders, was to protect the people of France. Any leader would say that. And any country’s citizens would expect that, too. But the line between protecting citizens and protecting civil liberties is very fine.

As it is, civil liberties movements, particularly in the UK and the United States, are increasingly critical of the way in which their governments’ antiterrorism measures impinge more and more on individual freedoms. The decision by Britain and the United States to suspend habeas corpus—thus preventing a detained person from being brought before the courts to examine that detention—was a serious blow to civil liberties.

That is just the tip of the iceberg. U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein’s devastating report on CIA detentions and torture has greatly damaged America’s standing as a country passionate about defending human rights and civil liberties.

Those at #CharlieHebdo paid a high price for not poisoning freedom of speech.

France’s and Europe’s reaction to the attack on Charlie Hebdo will be watched closely by those struggling for freedom across North Africa and the Middle East. Freedom House, a nongovernmental organization that monitors press freedom around the world, in 2013 reported an increase in the repression of the media. More recently, restrictions on the press in Turkey—not to mention the rise of the Islamic State—has imposed further pressure on the media, particularly on cartoonists.

And since cartoons are one of the few ways of describing so much with a minimum of words, their artists have become easy prey for those who fear that kind of freedom of expression. Those at Charlie Hebdo paid a high price for not poisoning that freedom.

Well done, well written presentation. The "idea" is what we aspire to protect, not alone our "security". It seems a very difficult and uncertain point in time, but those murders in Paris can "avenged" by standing firm, the citizen as much as the state, to protect our beliefs and freedom. Patience and respect will be required, towards those who challenge us and towards those who are angry.

Post your comments 2500 character limit. No links or markup permitted. Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Screen names appear with your comment.

Screen Name

Follow the conversation—Sign up to receive email updates when comments are posted to this article.

Email Address

Characters Used 0

eric siverson

January 09, 20159:18 pm

It is against the law to ask anyone more than once to attend a Christian Church It may also be a crime to make derogatory remarks against Islam . I suppose cartoons are offending Islam too Over 60 % of all Muslims say this is a serious crime only 11 % think death is the most appropiat punishment . Sharia law is the law of the Muslims France should have learned this by now and stpped offending Muslims .

Post your comments 2500 character limit. No links or markup permitted. Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Screen names appear with your comment.

Screen Name

Follow the conversation—Sign up to receive email updates when comments are posted to this article.

Email Address

Characters Used 0

simon

January 10, 201512:59 am

How sad this reaction is.
Instead of conceding that there is a problem with the so called religion called Islam. The knee-jerk reaction is to completely side-step this and focus only on those who oppose this Ideology and are in the difficult position of having to weed out the evil people who take their religion too seriously and those who without knowing it actually subscribe more to the western constitutions than to their evil book.
Merkel has no problem with Mein Kampf being forbidden (which can also be read by millions who do not subsequently turn to violence) so why does she not ban the Koran on the same grounds?

Post your comments 2500 character limit. No links or markup permitted. Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Screen names appear with your comment.

Screen Name

Follow the conversation—Sign up to receive email updates when comments are posted to this article.

Email Address

Characters Used 0

R Srinivasan

January 11, 201511:11 pm

The articles focuses on one of the most important challenges the we face - civil liberties v. Security. It is important that governments across the world realize that they have an obligation not only to provide security but also an obligation to protect citizens from abuse in the name of security.

Post your comments 2500 character limit. No links or markup permitted. Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Screen names appear with your comment.

Screen Name

Follow the conversation—Sign up to receive email updates when comments are posted to this article.

Email Address

Characters Used 0

mohamed lafouairas

January 11, 20153:30 pm

i deeply condemn the recent attacks against a french magazine . i want to emphasize that the terrorists have no common link with the true spirit of Islam , and therefore they represent themselves or in a broader sense , the terrorist doctrine they are adherent to .security measure alone an not be the magic solution as it becomes necessary and urgently to start a true and authentic dialogue between the west and the east based on mutual understanding of each other's own morals , historgy and religious beliefs and economic and social privacy.

Post your comments 2500 character limit. No links or markup permitted. Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. Screen names appear with your comment.

Screen Name

Follow the conversation—Sign up to receive email updates when comments are posted to this article.

Email Address

Characters Used 0

Jeannine Struck

January 12, 201512:52 am

Thanks, Judy, for a balanced, unbiased view of the situation. While our media focuses primarily on fear of future attacks by people claiming to represent Islam, there is little focus on violent acts of vengeance that have happened since the Charlie attacks. These attacks threaten our freedom here just as much as the Charlie attacks have.

Comment Policy

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Subscribe Today

Sign up to receive Judy Dempsey’s Strategic Europe updates in your inbox! Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.