Tiffany Jenkins: Kirstie Allsopp’s fertility views

Kirstie Allsopp is well-known for her traditional views. Picture: Contributed

COMMENTS from TV presenter on when women should have children reveals sensitivities in a key debate, writes Tiffany Jenkins

The Location, Location, Location presenter Kirstie Allsopp is well-known for her traditional views. Type her name into Google and the search engine suggests adding the following words: crafts kits; stationery; husband; dresses.

But this week she overstepped the mark of what is considered an acceptable opinion to hold, when she gave an interview to a national newspaper in which she said we need to speak “honestly and frankly” about fertility. The incendiary part came when she said she would tell a hypothetical daughter: “Darling, do you know what? Don’t go to university. Start work straight after school. Stay at home, save up your deposit … then we can find you a nice boyfriend and you can have a baby by the time you’re 27.”

Social media erupted, criticising Allsopp as anti-feminist. Prominent experts were called upon to pontificate on how wrong she was. One of the nicest comments called her “patronising”. Elsewhere, the pro-vice chancellor of Sussex University pointed out: “Family and university are not mutually exclusive”.

Appearing on Newsnight, Allsopp underlined her comments, saying: “Nature is not a feminist. Do whatever you want, but be aware of the fertility window. Make your choices in an informed way. This has been a taboo topic. People have not discussed it.”

I don’t agree with her. Although it is true that fertility declines after our mid-30s, it is not the case that we are not aware of this – far from it. There have been a number of scares about declining fertility, so much so there are increasing numbers of women in their late 30s and 40s having abortions because they had wrongly assumed they were too old to become pregnant. And having spent a fair part of my adult life studying and working in universities, I am not on board with her suggestion that young women postpone higher education, that they go after they have had children. It’s not realistic for most women to start a career in their mid-30s; a career takes time to build. But it should also be possible to say university isn’t for everyone – female or male. This is something that we should be able to discuss.

But Allsopp is not wrong in highlighting issues with how we reproduce and organise our lives. More people get pregnant much later than they used to and not all the reasons for this are positive. Having a family is seen as such a difficult task that this could be scaring some people off. Allsopp made valid points and raised reasonable questions. And yet the anger and ridicule directed at her, often from other women – the supposed sisterhood – were nasty and unhelpful. We are in trouble if we cannot have a sensible discussion about how we produce and raise the next generation.

Now that the outrage has subsided, we need to ask: why did her comments cause such a furore?

One reason is that she disturbed a vocal community who (rightly, in my mind, even if they could be less hysterical) believe in the importance and priority of a woman’s education and career, both of which were once regarded as secondary to child-rearing. But I also think there is more to it. A recently published book – Parenting Culture Studies – sheds light on significant developments in how our culture thinks about parenting and child-rearing. In a series of chapters, academics from different fields explore in depth the contemporary obsession with parenting. Far from a neutral term describing raising children, parenting is now considered an important but potentially risky sphere of social life. The editor, Ellie Lee, writes: “Parental action, in most areas of everyday life, is now considered to have a determining impact on a child’s future happiness, healthiness and success.”

Partly because of this, everyday issues about how parents bring up their kids – how they feed them, talk to them, play with them or discipline them – have become public and policy debates. So breastfeeding or schooling is the subject of discussion not just between family and friends, but becomes hotly debated more broadly.

And it means parents are under constant scrutiny. Because, make no mistake, most of the messages from child-rearing experts or policy advisers is that the impact parents will have on their kids will be a negative one, one that they need to do everything they can to address.

One of the most important developments in recent decades is that any discussion about parenting or how children should be raised is that it is taken to be a personal expression of fundamental values. I expect we have all experienced this in some way. Anyone who has spoken about how they parent, or why they are childless, how they raise their children, or how they think others should, will know it ends being a fraught and emotional discussion. It is like walking in a minefield.

Raising the next generation is the future and about love, so we are bound to experience it as important, but something else seems to be going on. How we parent, if we parent – anything to do with fertility or children at all – is imbued with a heightened level of insecurity and sensitivity, as if it says something incredibly meaningful about us. This transforms ordinary questions and everyday problems such as how and when people raise their kids into decisions of great magnitude. Needless to say, as a consequence, talking about having kids, or choosing to not have them, is something we become defensive about, whatever choice we make.

There are discussions we need to have, such as: why are people leaving it so late to have children? Can we make it easier for people to raise a family? Can we alleviate some of the anxiety? Can we improve childcare, make it more affordable? Can we depoliticise parenting? But in order to do so, we all need to be able to have discussions and disagreements about maternity, paternity and raising kids without it being taken as a personal attack.

Honest and frank conversations are what is required. On that, Allsopp has a point.

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice.
If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the
Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the IPSO by
clicking here.

The Scotsman provides news, events and sport features from the Edinburgh area. For the best up to date information relating to Edinburgh and the surrounding areas visit us at The Scotsman regularly or bookmark this page.

For you to enjoy all the features of this website The Scotsman requires permission to use cookies.

Find Out More ▼

What is a Cookie?

What is a Flash Cookie?

Can I opt out of receiving Cookies?

About our Cookies

Cookies are small data files which are sent to your browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome etc) from a website you visit. They are stored on your electronic device.

This is a type of cookie which is collected by Adobe Flash media player (it is also called a Local Shared Object) - a piece of software you may already have on your electronic device to help you watch online videos and listen to podcasts.

Yes there are a number of options available, you can set your browser either to reject all cookies, to allow only "trusted" sites to set them, or to only accept them from the site you are currently on.

However, please note - if you block/delete all cookies, some features of our websites, such as remembering your login details, or the site branding for your local newspaper may not function as a result.

The types of cookies we, our ad network and technology partners use are listed below:

Revenue Science ►

A tool used by some of our advertisers to target adverts to you based on pages you have visited in the past. To opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Google Ads ►

Our sites contain advertising from Google; these use cookies to ensure you get adverts relevant to you. You can tailor the type of ads you receive by visiting here or to opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Digital Analytics ►

This is used to help us identify unique visitors to our websites. This data is anonymous and we cannot use this to uniquely identify individuals and their usage of the sites.

Dart for Publishers ►

This comes from our ad serving technology and is used to track how many times you have seen a particular ad on our sites, so that you don't just see one advert but an even spread. This information is not used by us for any other type of audience recording or monitoring.

ComScore ►

ComScore monitor and externally verify our site traffic data for use within the advertising industry. Any data collected is anonymous statistical data and cannot be traced back to an individual.

Local Targeting ►

Our Classified websites (Photos, Motors, Jobs and Property Today) use cookies to ensure you get the correct local newspaper branding and content when you visit them. These cookies store no personally identifiable information.

Grapeshot ►

We use Grapeshot as a contextual targeting technology, allowing us to create custom groups of stories outside out of our usual site navigation. Grapeshot stores the categories of story you have been exposed to. Their privacy policy and opt out option can be accessed here.

Subscriptions Online ►

Our partner for Newspaper subscriptions online stores data from the forms you complete in these to increase the usability of the site and enhance user experience.

Add This ►

Add This provides the social networking widget found in many of our pages. This widget gives you the tools to bookmark our websites, blog, share, tweet and email our content to a friend.