The Virtue of Nonviolence: My Impressions of the Dalai Lama

By Qin Weiping

January 31, 2014

New York City was still wrapped in slumber when I arrived at the
Hotel Beacon, near Central Park, at six a.m. on October 20, 2013.

I had been invited to meet a legendary
figure: the Fourteenth Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibet.
Despite his worldwide renown as a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, he is excoriated
in the official Chinese media as an arch-villain the likes of Chiang
Kai-shek. In Chinese propaganda, he appears as an “enemy” Tibetan
separatist conspiring in exile with his “clique” to gain Tibetan independence
and fragment the motherland, while instigating Tibetan unrest and
self-immolations within China to further his plot.

As a young person born and raised in
China, I opposed Tibetan independence. Frankly, I had a rather low
opinion of the Dalai Lama, after having had it drummed into my head all my life
that he was a criminal ring-leader. My eyes were first opened to other
possible viewpoints while I was attending an international scholarly conference
in America in May 2013. There I heard Mr. Kunga Tashi, Chinese Liaison
Officer at the Office of Tibet in New York, explaining the Dalai Lama’s “Middle
Way Approach.” Instead of independence for Tibet, he said, the Dalai Lama
advocated only that Tibet be accorded the rights guaranteed to Autonomous
Regions under the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China. This
contradicted all that I had ever been taught. I wondered why I had never
heard mention of the Dalai Lama’s “Middle Way” during my time in China.
Whom should I believe?

My curiosity aroused, I made an
appointment with Mr. Kunga Tashi in June. He was the first Tibetan I had
ever met, and he impressed me as a modest, reasonable, and scholarly
individual. He told me how the Chinese military had occupied Tibet, unleashing
a chain of events involving the Dalai Lama, who had fled into exile in India in
order to preserve the unique Tibetan religion and culture, followed by more
than 100,000 Tibetans. After leading his exile government into the modern
democratic fold, he had retired from his political duties in 2011 and now
functioned only as a religious figurehead, traveling the world to promote
Buddhism, ecumenical human values, and religious tolerance.

I resonated deeply with Mr. Kunga
Tashi’s account of the tragedy of modern Tibetan history, and I remarked to him
that historical materials had recently come to light documenting the starvation
deaths of tens of millions of Han Chinese during the endless turmoil of
Communist political campaigns. Moreover, it was clear that the Tibetan people
had only worsened their plight through their valiant attempts to resist Chinese
suppression, and that the Chinese Communist Party had deliberately driven a
wedge between Han Chinese and Tibetans as part of its “divide and conquer”
strategy. Official Chinese claims that Tibet sought outright independence had
alienated Han Chinese who would have supported the more limited Tibetan goal of
autonomy within China, with its laudable aim of preserving the Tibetan
linguistic, cultural, and religious heritage.

Nonetheless, in the free
atmosphere of the West I had also heard calls for Tibetan independence,
particularly from the Tibetan Youth Congress. Realizing that the Tibetan
diaspora was divided, it occurred to me that the Dalai Lama’s “Middle Way”
might be a mere expedient. To allay my misgivings, Mr. Kunga Tashi
arranged an opportunity for me to meet the Dalai Lama and assess his sincerity
firsthand, which I accepted eagerly. I was a former news reporter, and
history makers fascinated me.

At the Hotel Beacon on that dark
October morning, I underwent a rigorous security inspection and proceeded into
the lobby, which was bustling despite the early hour of the day. There
were about a dozen Tibetan Buddhists of all ages, who smiled at me politely,
although I was unable to communicate with them in Tibetan. There was also a
young Han Chinese woman exchange student from out of state, who had squeezed this
trip to New York into her demanding schedule. With her was a young
Tibetan woman for whom an encounter with the Dalai Lama was the fulfillment of
a lifelong dream.

Finally, the Dalai Lama appeared
in his monk’s robes, with a radiance and vigor that belied his advanced age of
seventy-eight. Following the Tibetan custom, I presented him with a white silk
ceremonial scarf, and he shook my hands warmly and inquired where I was from. I
replied that my home was Guangji, in Hubei, birthplace of Sima Daoxin, the
Fourth Patriarch of Zen Buddhism. The Dalai Lama thanked me in Chinese
for coming, winning my heart with his kind, unassuming demeanor. The
young Tibetan woman beside me had burst into tears at the mere sight of him, a
reminder of Tibetan suffering under the draconian religious policies of the
Chinese Communists.

Our morning meeting with the Dalai Lama
was necessarily brief, because he was on his way to conduct a Buddhist
ceremony. However, I knew I would hear more about his doctrine of nonviolence,
love, and compassion at his public lecture on “The Virtue of Nonviolence” at
the Beacon Theatre that afternoon. I arrived at the theater a couple of
hours ahead of time, and found crowds already milling around in front.
Tickets were scarce and expensive, but throngs of pious Tibetans in traditional
dress had come nonetheless, believing that proximity to the Dalai Lama would
bring them supreme joy and glory, even if they did not manage to catch a
glimpse of him.

A full-house audience of almost three
thousand—an approximately equal mix of Tibetans and Americans—had passed the
security clearance and awaited the Dalai Lama in the theater. Thanks to the
educational system the Dalai Lama had established in Dharamsala, many of the
Tibetans spoke fluent English.

At two p.m., the Dalai Lama entered to
a standing ovation from the audience. After starting off with a few humorous
remarks, he moved on to the heart of his message, which overturned the usual
definitions of “violence” and “nonviolence.” Nonviolence, he said, was
any altruistic, compassionate act, even a harsh or seemingly violent one.
Conversely, true violence was the failure—through selfishness—to take righteous
action or to speak out against injustice. According to this Buddhist wisdom,
then, silence in the face of Chinese Communist tyranny counted as an act of
violence!

The Dalai Lama stated that the
twentieth century had been excruciatingly painful, as its two world wars had
exacted a staggering human cost. Regrettably, stubborn conflicts
persisted in the new century, but violence was entirely
counterproductive. As the world population soared toward ten billion,
each ethnic group, nation, and individual needed to stop thinking in terms of
“us” and “them,” learning instead to regard all humanity as a single human
community faced with shared problems: climate change, degradation of the
environment, and the gap between rich and poor. Every human being, no
matter how destitute, deserved the basic social guarantees that would enable
him or her to strive for progress. The Dalai Lama wholeheartedly endorsed
former Chinese Communist Party Secretary Hu Jintao’s ideal of a harmonious
society. However, he cautioned that China had fallen short of its
proclaimed goal: true harmony was not merely external, and could not be secured
by the use of force.

The Dalai Lama stood and lectured
extemporaneously for an hour in English, exuding the vigor of a man half his
age, and interacting constantly with his spellbound audience. After
hearing him declare humbly that he was “just one of the seven billion beings
who inhabit this planet,” subject to the same physical, mental, and emotional
problems as anyone else, it was easy to forget that he was an exalted religious
leader lecturing from on high. He seemed more like a wise, humorous,
grandfatherly figure explaining his simple credo that “warm-heartedness” was
the “real source of a happy life.” Suddenly I saw why he was so popular
in the West: he addressed concerns that far transcended the borders of Tibet or
China.

During the question-and-answer session,
dissident Chinese artist Ai Weiwei asked the Dalai Lama (via Twitter) if he had
any hope of returning to China. He replied that he had always wished to
do so, but the Chinese government had denied him permission. He had not
completely given up, and especially hoped to make a pilgrimage to Mt. Wutai, a
sacred Buddhist site.

In response to questions about Tibetan
independence, the Dalai Lama affirmed that he neither sought it nor considered
it a feasible option. True autonomy, on the other hand, with its
preservation of Tibetan language, culture, and religious traditions, would be
advantageous to both China and Tibet. Moreover, he added, most Tibetans in
the diaspora supported his “Middle Way Approach,” with only a small minority
demanding complete independence. This group was merely exercising its
right to freedom of speech, he felt, as it had neither the capital nor a
realistic strategy for achieving its goal. He said that he had discussed
his “Middle Way” repeatedly with the Chinese since the 1970s, but they had
shelved his proposal for reasons of their own. As he recalled his
interactions with Mao and other Chinese Communist leaders, he seemed well disposed
toward them and even called Mao a great revolutionary. I, however, saw
things rather differently: I believed that Tibet would never have real
autonomy unless China achieved true democracy.

I hope that the Dalai Lama will live
long enough to see both dreams come true, for he is the key to solving the
question of Tibet, and we who advocate democracy for China wholeheartedly share
his respect for nonviolence. Han Chinese and Tibetans, both in China and
abroad, must forge friendship through mutual understanding. We are, after
all, fraternal peoples. And I now understand that the Dalai Lama,
esteemed worldwide, is a font of wisdom for the entire human race.

NOTE: Qin Weiping, penname Qin Bang, was born in Hubei Province in
February 1980. A former news reporter, young entrepreneur, and
independent economist, he is an advocate of nonviolent democratic revolution in
China. He maintained the officially registered micro-blog @QinBang on Sina and
NetEase, totaling 9,000 entries and 320,000 followers, but it was silenced
after tens of thousands of people within China responded strongly to an
impassioned plea he made at a rally for human rights and democracy in China in
Times Square, New York in 2013. The above article has been published in several Chinese news portals and it was translated into English by Susan Wolf.

I hope more people read this article! It kept me engaged till the end. Thanks to Mr.Qin Weiping for a wonderful piece. Your one meeting with His Holiness made a big difference by letting the world know about Tibet.

Though he is just one Chinese, I think it signals our Middle Way Approach has got a future. Thumps up to the Middle Way Approach believers. Not really a thump down to the Rangzen advocates, but this kind of articles by China's own citizens are the proofs that Rangzen believers need to change their stance and join MDW advocates under CTA leadership.