ORDER: Defendant Stop & Shop seeks interlocutory relief, pursuant to G.L. c. 231, § 118, first par., from a Superior Court order allowing the plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint. After review, I find that the defendant has not sufficiently demonstrated any error in the motion judge's conclusion that the allowance of the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of summary judgment suspended the finality of that judgment and thus did not bar the plaintiffs from subsequently filing a motion to amend. Nor do I find that the judge otherwise abused his broad discretion in allowing the motion. See Cappuccino v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Spencer, 398 Mass. 304, 314 (1986). The petition is therefore denied (Rubin, J.). Notice/attest/Kinder, J. footnotes (1) Cernak Buick, Inc. (2) Dennis Courtney as trustee of the Margaret H. Courtney Family Trust; Courtney Easthampton, LLC; and the Stop & Shop Supermarket Co,, LLC.