Google translate:
The whole country must know my position around a series of corruption events that involve several members of the dictatorship, some disappointing individualities of Parliament and clear international interests that finance this crude plan.

So. Here is a really good article/good source about the Trump/Ukraine issue; my only question now is, so why did the Dems proceed with this sham impeachment bs when the DOJ had already cleared this issue? Wasn't aware that Congress could over-ride decisions made by the DOJ.

Quote:Department of Justice Clears Trump Less Than 24 Hours After Pelosi’s Impeachment Announcement
September 25, 2019

Quote:September 25, 2019

The Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it opted not to investigate President Donald Trump over a controversial phone call he had in July with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The news came hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California announced the start of an official impeachment probe.

“The actions of the Trump presidency revealed the dishonorable fact of the president’s betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our elections,” Pelosi told reporters on Tuesday from the Capitol Building, according to ABC News.

Pelosi cited the Ukraine controversy in her brief statement about impeachment.

Prior to the Wednesday release of the transcript of the call, Trump critics claimed the president was withholding $400 million in aid from Ukraine as a bargaining chip he was using to get Ukraine to investigate past activities of Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden’s son.

TRENDING: Letter Democratic Senators Sent to Ukraine Urging It To Investigate Trump Resurfaces

The transcript released by the White House does not mention the aid, which was eventually released to Ukraine in September.

Investigators looked into the call to see whether Trump had sought a sort of campaign contribution from Ukraine by asking Zelensky to probe the family of a political opponent, and decided there was no basis for a criminal investigation, The Washington Times reported.

The Department of Justice’s Criminal Division “reviewed the official record of the call and determined, based on the facts and applicable law, that there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted,” DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec told HuffPost for an article published Wednesday.

So, how are things progressing at GITMO, you may ask? Here's an interesting article explaining the pre-trials and what's been going on. Then, Barr stepped in. Long read, so grab a cup of coffee and make a sandwich. Worth the read. Article is written by a Citizen Journalist, a Digital Warrior, btw.

(12-01-2019, 12:55 PM)Firefly Wrote: So. Here is a really good article/good source about the Trump/Ukraine issue; my only question now is, so why did the Dems proceed with this sham impeachment bs when the DOJ had already cleared this issue? Wasn't aware that Congress could over-ride decisions made by the DOJ.

Quote:Department of Justice Clears Trump Less Than 24 Hours After Pelosi’s Impeachment Announcement
September 25, 2019

Quote:September 25, 2019

The Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it opted not to investigate President Donald Trump over a controversial phone call he had in July with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The news came hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California announced the start of an official impeachment probe.

“The actions of the Trump presidency revealed the dishonorable fact of the president’s betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our elections,” Pelosi told reporters on Tuesday from the Capitol Building, according to ABC News.

Pelosi cited the Ukraine controversy in her brief statement about impeachment.

Prior to the Wednesday release of the transcript of the call, Trump critics claimed the president was withholding $400 million in aid from Ukraine as a bargaining chip he was using to get Ukraine to investigate past activities of Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden’s son.

TRENDING: Letter Democratic Senators Sent to Ukraine Urging It To Investigate Trump Resurfaces

The transcript released by the White House does not mention the aid, which was eventually released to Ukraine in September.

Investigators looked into the call to see whether Trump had sought a sort of campaign contribution from Ukraine by asking Zelensky to probe the family of a political opponent, and decided there was no basis for a criminal investigation, The Washington Times reported.

The Department of Justice’s Criminal Division “reviewed the official record of the call and determined, based on the facts and applicable law, that there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted,” DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec told HuffPost for an article published Wednesday.

Be sure and look at the date on this article. Looks like we'll be trimming trees before Congress gets this memo.

The DOJ is part of the Executive branch. They have, in the past, done much leg work for all sections of government because
they are equipped to do so plus they have the people TRAINED to do the research. Congress is the Legislative branch and can do
as they please. As of late, they are real good at wasting time and money on stupid shit. When they passed the amendment after
WW 2 to limit a President's term, they should have done so for themselves. Maybe the Judicial branch as well. Rotten bastards.

I saw this on 8kun research, and thought it was fitting to post here, as a reminder about the censorship going on right now:

Quote:Legacy media shills lie to protect child rapists their content is mental rat poison, generated primarily for the purpose of social control, management of consumer behavior and psycho-sexual demoralization; not an accident, but as an IW (Information War) tactic.

Our common information supply (circulating news and entertainment media content) has been poisoned; progressively degraded over decades with media content engineered to cause harm. Our vocabulary has been gradually reduced until and we’ve been taught to let ‘experts’ and others think for us.

“Information Poisoning” is a form of psychological attack or “psyop” that damages our cognitive capacity over time.

The primary purpose of legacy media news and entertainment content is not to amuse and inform but to control. Legacy media content suggests we buy things, adopt a fashion, get a piercing.

Can you think of any self-destructive social behaviors promoted by legacy media since 1950?

We human beings are extremely suggestible and highly imitative.

Legacy media is part of a social control system built by the clowns and used by the clowns to guide and constrain human consciousness, to manipulate purchasing behavior and limit what we are capable of understanding.

Legacy media has been used by satanist pedovores to create a distracted, obsessive hyper-sexualized consumer cargo culture.

(12-01-2019, 12:55 PM)Firefly Wrote: So. Here is a really good article/good source about the Trump/Ukraine issue; my only question now is, so why did the Dems proceed with this sham impeachment bs when the DOJ had already cleared this issue? Wasn't aware that Congress could over-ride decisions made by the DOJ.

Quote:Department of Justice Clears Trump Less Than 24 Hours After Pelosi’s Impeachment Announcement
September 25, 2019

Quote:September 25, 2019

The Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it opted not to investigate President Donald Trump over a controversial phone call he had in July with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The news came hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California announced the start of an official impeachment probe.

“The actions of the Trump presidency revealed the dishonorable fact of the president’s betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our elections,” Pelosi told reporters on Tuesday from the Capitol Building, according to ABC News.

Pelosi cited the Ukraine controversy in her brief statement about impeachment.

Prior to the Wednesday release of the transcript of the call, Trump critics claimed the president was withholding $400 million in aid from Ukraine as a bargaining chip he was using to get Ukraine to investigate past activities of Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden’s son.

TRENDING: Letter Democratic Senators Sent to Ukraine Urging It To Investigate Trump Resurfaces

The transcript released by the White House does not mention the aid, which was eventually released to Ukraine in September.

Investigators looked into the call to see whether Trump had sought a sort of campaign contribution from Ukraine by asking Zelensky to probe the family of a political opponent, and decided there was no basis for a criminal investigation, The Washington Times reported.

The Department of Justice’s Criminal Division “reviewed the official record of the call and determined, based on the facts and applicable law, that there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted,” DOJ spokeswoman Kerri Kupec told HuffPost for an article published Wednesday.