The concept of a smart city involves bringing together various modern technologies and solutions that can ensure comfortable and convenient provision of services to people, public safety, efficient consumption of resources, etc. However, something that often goes under the radar of enthusiasts championing the smart city concept is the security of smart city components themselves. The truth is that a smart city’s infrastructure develops faster than security tools do, leaving ample room for the activities of both curious researchers and cybercriminals.

The data obtained by Honeypot sensors requires manual analysis and interpretation, and in most cases cannot be used in automated tools to identify the threat in other segments of the network. It is necessary to create and demonstrate a set of data that can be used as indicators of compromise (IoC) and which is received in an automated mode. The use of this data by other automated tools should not lead to false positives.

Almost two years I’ve been focused on cybersecurity of smart medicine. The result was collected in 3 reports:
1. Introduction in the topic: https://t.co/RJDxzpyBHY
2. Threat landscape: https://t.co/mxLEXX3CDg
3. Recommendations and mitigation strategy: https://t.co/v7S3kwmufD