FarketyFarkerson:Another article says they broke up in 2011 and the child is now two years old. Sounds possible the guy had a change of heart about having a child with her after she was already pregnant. Something doesn't add up here.

It's journalist math. Things get rounded both ways so often that at the end of the article nothing adds up. Rounding up 1 = 2 for a sufficiently large value of 1.

The important part here is that there is no other way Devall could have gotten pregnant. The vasectomy was done a decade before her kid popped out, and it's easy as hell to test if a vasectomy has reversed itself or not. Unless she managed to jab a syringe into his balls while he wasn't looking, she had to get the sperm from that sperm bank.

Man On A Mission:Let the court decide the amount of monthly child support is appropriate, then require the sperm bank to pay that amount so that not a dime comes out of the unwitting father's pocket and the child doesn't have to suffer either.

sgtbarthel:Women have reproductive rights. Men have reproductive responsibilities. Waiting for women who claim they want equality to accept the same responibilities as men or grant men the same rights they have.

The wronged party is the poor two year old with a crazy, selfish mother and a father who never wanted him. That sperm bank is farked three ways as I see it. The man has a suit for his sperm having been given to the wrong woman. The ex wife has a suit for the loss of any chance to conceive another child by her ex (whether or not she ever intended to, that was her option under the contract the couple signed and the sperm bank violated). The child, when he comes of age, has a suit for all the emotional pain and suffering he's going to suffer growing up as a result of this. That poor, poor kid.