Wikiphilia??Hacknot's got an essay
that demands at least 30 minutes of ones time to make an equally
elequent response to what looks like a narrow experience.
Yet it starts out with a one-two punch: Horrible associative label,
then slam on the inevitable gap that follows a hopeful venture. (Ya
know, unless it's a sure thing, you're an idiot. vs. Somethings better
than nothing, why not experiment?)
Yet because it's a popular website, popular topic, and written
intelligently, it will be held up as agnostic gospel. There's a pattern there somewhere... Maybe it'll get Slashdotted and put through that meat grinder...
Final thought: Wiki's are as varied as styles of poetry.