With today's technology the whole video would be very easy to produce. The little flash that was called a foo could have been created very easily,
you wouldn't need 3d animation for that part. All that being said it could also just be a cloud reflecting the sun setting and the flash could be a
reflection or an object between the camera and the cloud that only caught the sun light briefly. This doesn't mean that it was faked. IMO

In case you wonder why I would consider myself qualified to answer, I've been working with the following editing and CGI software since 2001

Originally posted by Mrgone
Someone asked for a CGI maker to give an opinion so here is mine.

With today's technology the whole video would be very easy to produce. The little flash that was called a foo could have been created very easily, you
wouldn't need 3d animation for that part. All that being said it could also just be a cloud reflecting the sun setting and the flash could be a
reflection or an object between the camera and the cloud that only caught the sun light briefly. This doesn't mean that it was faked. IMO

Question Everything

I have also done extensive work with 3D animation and other graphic editing tools and I agree that these sorts of video effects (editing a light into
a pre-existing video) , is very simple to do.

People have flooded YouTube and the Internet with spam "UFO" hoaxes created with and digital graphic editing tools. There still might be "real UFO"
sightings out there that are truly unexplained but it is very hard to find any discernible "signal" due to all the hoaxes and "lights in the sky" or
"bug/bird" videos that are posted.

Posting a video like this and claiming it is a "UFO" shooting out of a "cloud portal" just makes a mockery of the whole topic of UFOs. However, I
acknowledge that this is something happening probably hundreds of times a day - not just on this web forum but all over the Internet.

Sorry , I lately found this statement from the guy who posted this video in youtube and he said:

To make sure that it was not reflection of lamb, i turned﻿ off all the indoor lights. The cloudy thing was visible from all windows. You may
also can not judge the size of the object, i was nearly 2 miles away from me.

How can you say that is a lamp? That is the strangest looking lamp I have ever seen, longer on the right and shorter on the left???

Perhaps I was unclear. What I intended to suggest was that it looks like light from a lamp shining on the ceiling behind the person shooting
the video, and reflected off the window.

The suggestions of clouds is also interesting and I'll take another look when I have time, but my first impression was indeed that it was just the
light from a lamp shining on the ceiling and reflected by the window.

You're telling everyone to look closely at 0:21, but you yourself didn't see that the white dot appears well before the 0:21 point.

Look closely at 0:14.5 seconds in....the dot appears very briefly at the left side of the cloud or whatever it is, then dissapears, to reappear at
0:21...

Practicing with the laser pointer maybe?

Who knows..could be fake, could be real.

That's the problems, unless you witness something like this with your own eyes, there's no real way to varify any video as genuine. It would be a
different story if hundreds of people saw and recorded it, but so far only one..

Great pics, so i guess it happened?
This may or not be hoaxed,,, but it is interesting to note the other things UFO related going on in turkey lately as well....
I sure hope somebody posts corroborating film...
Or other pics of similar, maybe from Hessdalen? (which we KNOW is NOT a HOAX)
worth a comparison anyways.....
cheers

So painfully obviously lenticular clouds and ball lightning around 00:21 sec mark. The lighting either being the city lights being reflected upon the
lowest cloud or the sunset illuminating the cloud formation.

People, before calling "UFO 2012 OMFG INVASION BLUE BEAM ILLUMINATI" do some actual ground level research. Rule out all possible and probable means
for something you have not seen ever or often, its likely less 'out of this world' then you would think.

I am more concerned with the whoosh noise he makes around the 23 second mark. Of all the noises I might make if I had just witnessed something
real(if I made any at all because I would most likely be in shock), this would not be it. Now, I know nothing about CGI but I do know something about
human response to visual stimuli, and that sounded, honestly, like the response of someone who knew what was going to happen. The video, however,
does look strange and not manipulated through back lighting. Camera angle changes too much for that and the flash of light would most likely be seen
again.

Its no more a hoax than calling a video of a Cumulonimbus cloud a hoax. Its a natural weather phenomenon called Lenticular clouds and Ball lightning.
The lighting is either caused by the city light reflecting (unlikely due to the low amount of city glow on the other clouds) or the right angle of the
sunset as the sun light passes past the planar view and only hits vertical objects. (Likely due to low amount of light in the city and more vertically
close clouds)

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.