There are many customs and trends which have their affiliation with the non-Muslim culture and lifestyle.

Many Muslims, due to being afflicted with what appears to be a truly insecure and inferior complex, look towards and choose the customs and trends of the non-Muslims over that of the beautiful Sunnah.

It seems as if the need is to secure a kind of acceptance in a non-Muslim society and just blend in with them – so that we are not recognized as Muslims.

(sadly) Bridal Showers and Baby Showers have become synonymous with the Muslim lifestyle as it is with the rest of the non-Muslim lifestyle.

Many may ask: What’s wrong with giving gifts, congratulating the bride-to-be or the new mother, or having a get together with friends?

There is nothing wrong with giving the bride or the new mother a gift, or congratulating the person. To give a gift and congratulate are from the teachings of Islam – and would draw rewards … but there are conditions to be met in even these noble deeds.

What is extremely wrong and objectionable is the background to these good deeds. They are not within the parameters of Shari’ah.

The picture of a typical bridal shower and baby shower is not typical with the Sunnah.
It is typical of the non-Muslim way of life.

By following suit, we fall into the sin of “Tashabbu bil Kuffaar” (emulating the disbelievers). It is aligning oneself with those who have rejected Allah Ta’ala, who live their lives in immorality and disobedience (to their Owner, Allah the Owner and Master of All the worlds).

Jews do not have baby showers prior to the birth of a child. Some do not buy any baby items or set up the nursery until the child is born.

The custom stems from the idea that drawing attention to a happy occasion draws the attention of evil spirits and the evil eye. They believe that a baby shower is an outright invitation to the evil eye to descend upon the unborn baby in vengeance for rubbing your happiness in others’ faces and “counting your chickens before they hatch.”

Nikah is a great Ibaadah. Pregnancy and the birth of a child also have their requisites in Islam.

However, the west has commercialized all of these noble occasions, and made them into money-making events. The sacredness of these occasions is forgotten.

…Today, Nikah’s have taken on a distinct mould of a Hollywood or Bollywood style wedding – where the bride is dressed to look like a Christian bride or a Bollywood actress – with no sign of Islam on her; and the groom is dressed in a suit and tie, looking like a typical (non Muslim) Christian groom.

Adding insult to injury is the extravagance and open sin at the time of the wedding and Walimah. One’s mind moves in the direction of the millions and millions who are suffering famine and starvation, who have no home, no water, no food, no clothing – but the Muslim ignores all that suffering just for some fleeting attention and praise???

All those hundreds of thousands of Rands wasted on draping a hall, on dressing the chairs, on wine glasses, on musicians, photography, on wedding cards that are thrown away, etc. is money which could have been the means of alleviating the plight of so many suffering people.

One brother handed me an elaborate invitation card for his daughter’s wedding. I enquired as to the cost of the wedding card, and was told that each card cost R50. Advising him, I told him that almost all people throw away wedding cards. People generally dispose of them. So he should regard that as people throwing away hundreds of his R50 notes. Would he throw R50 notes into a bin? No.

However, the throwing away of those cards is equal to throwing away R50 notes. That same money could have been used in making the Aakhirah. (the Hereafter)

Even those who are known to be religious will waste thousands on halls, on décor, etc. sacrificing the pleasure of Allah Ta’ala and Rasulullah (šallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam).

Those who were meant to set the noble example of the Sunnah, who we expect are living the Sunnah – knowingly choose to forsake the Sunnah.

Simplicity, which is part of Imaan (true belief), is a rare sight in these times.

We have a perfect Sunnah – a Perfect Way of Life in the life of our Nabi (šallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) and in the lives of his Companions, men and women.
We have what is superior to all other cultures yet we consider everything else. It shows great weakness if we give preference to the culture of the Christians, Jews and Idol worshippers over the noble Sunnah of Rasulullah (šallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam).

We are exchanging (flawless) diamonds for (worthless) stones… and what an unprofitable exchange this is! What a great loss!

Nabi (šallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) also said that we will be raised on the Day of Reckoning with those whom we imitate in this worldly life. (May Allah Ta’ala save us from such disgrace and humiliation, Aameen)

Emulating the non-Muslim culture is one downfall but there are many more that are found in the Bridal and Baby Showers.

The non-Muslims have coined a novel concept of begging – especially amongst the upper-class. It seems as if some, from amongst the wealthy, have developed an art to begging. They even have a name for it. In the name of Bridal Showers, Baby Showers, Registries, people gracefully and politely extend their hands, and they ask and take from others.

The bride-to-be chooses her gifts from exclusive stores that offer a “registry” or she unashamedly hands out a list of those items she wants gifted to her. In the process, she places pressure and financial difficulty and sometimes a great burden on others – to purchase those gifts that she has chosen.

At the get-together, these gifts and other gifts are presented to the bride-to-be, who opens them and shows them to all present – and each person can assess the kind of money that was spent on the gift given.

Let us now consider the various wrongs in this act:

..a person is forced to purchase gifts that the bride has chosen – which may be beyond her budget in spending.

..a person who gives something simple or inexpensive will feel ashamed and embarrassed, considering the manner in which gifts are being received and shown to others.

If Muhabbah is not created then this proves that either the giver or receiver in insincere.

..sometimes, people give with intentions other than expressing their Muhabbah. However, there are many who request or are desirous of receiving and there is a kind of greed from the receiving side. This request or expectation (ishraaf) reveals insincerity from the one who is receiving.

A gift must be given happily and willingly – and should be received graciously and thankfully. This is the Sunnah. (practice & teachings of Nabi Moehammad peace and blessings be upon him)

However, when we ask of people, as in the case of registries, etc. – people will give, but they give unhappily and unwillingly. …and if some gift is given, which is not to our liking, then we receive it without any appreciation and thanks. This is our lamentable condition.

Another aspect that has also been brought to attention is the immorality and shamelessness at such gatherings – with indecent talk, shameless dressing by Muslim women, inappropriate games, music, dancing and such filthy entertainment, that we would not want to bring on to our tongues. It is not permissible for a person to attend such gatherings. The Shari’ah instructs us:

‘IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE TO BE PRESENT IN A GATHERING WHERE ALLAH TA’ALA IS BEING DISOBEYED.’

Moreover, a person’s presence is aiding in promoting and glorifying what is not permissible. We are told not to assist each other in sin; rather to assist in what is righteous:

“Help each other in righteousness and piety, and do not help each other in sin and aggression.”
[Al Quran Surah Al-Maa’idah 5:2]

A bride-to-be is known for her modesty and shyness – but all of this is lost in adopting the culture of the non-Muslims. Their dressing and their fashion nurtures immodesty. Added to this, these sins are publicized and photographs are taken and uploaded on social media – for all and sundry to view the level of our degeneration.

The heart bleeds at this miscarriage of the Sunnah. … Nay, this abortion of the Sunnah. How will we meet our Beloved Nabi (Peace and Blessings of Allāh be upon him) on the Day of Judgment?

How will we show our faces to the one whose entire life was sacrificed so that today we be the reciters of the Kalimah?

May Allah Ta’ala have mercy upon us since we stand to lose by adopting this culture. If we continue in this line and direction, we will lose the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala and we will lose the great rewards for enlivening and practising the Sunnah. (example and advice of the last Prophet of Allah)

We also stand to lose the companionship of Rasulullah (šallallaahu ‘alayh wasallam) at the (thirst quenching) fountain of Kauthar on the Day of Judgment and even stand to lose the success of our marriages due to having sacrificed the beautiful, noble Sunnah by means of our emulation (mindless copying) of the Hollywood and Bollywood (sinful) culture.

If our allegiance is to Allah Ta’ala and His Rasul (šallallaahu ‘alayhi wasallam), then there should be no delay in repentance and mending our ways and coming back to what is pure and beautiful – Islam and the Sunnah.
In this… is the success of both worlds.

May Allah Ta’ala grant us the understanding, the concern and the Taufeeq of Aml, Aameen

Question: There is a Turkish drama, ‘Ar Tughrul’ being shown on television. The Muftis of Madrasah Jaamiatur Rasheed of Karachi have issued a fatwa of permissibility. The following is their fatwa.

Translation of the Fatwa

Among the contemporary Ulama-e-Kiraam there is difference of opinion pertaining to digital pictures. According to some, such pictures are permissible while others (other Ulama) say that it is not permissible. According to us, in the light of the dhuroorat (dire need) there is scope for making and viewing digital pictures. Hence, in our opinion there is scope for viewing and selling the Ar Tughrul drama because in this drama is shown the history and culture of Khilaafat-e-Uthmaaniyyah. In viewing it, there is the opportunity for the Muslim youth to become aware of Islamic history and culture which is a very important need of this age.

However, since in this drama the activities of some females are also shown, it is necessary to abstain from looking at these women. If it is difficult for any man to restrain his eyes from the women, then for him it will not be permissible to view this drama because it is a principle of Fiqh: Warding off harm has priority over deriving benefit. Therefore, if there is the fear of evil looking when viewing the drama, then it is incumbent to abstain from sin. In this instance it is not permissible to look at the drama. (End of the fatwa which is signed by three Muftis of the Madrasah).

Please comment in the light of the Shariah on this fatwa.

ANSWER AND COMMENT (By Mujlisul Ulama):

The drivel (ghutha) which this fatwa contains is indeed surprising. It is surprising and lamentable that three Muftis from a well-known Islamic institution have acquitted themselves with such puerility and incompetency as illustrated in their fatwa. They have displayed lamentable ignorance regarding the application of the principles of Fiqh which they have referred to in their fatwa. Such incompetence is not expected of even students who have not as yet acquired qualification in the sphere of Iftaa’. Minus Taqwa, shaitaan exercises a strong influence of the muftis.

The objective of Fatwa is to bring Muslims closer to Allah Ta’ala, not to widen the chasm which transgressors have created with their fisq and fujoor.

In addition to portrayal of academic incompetence, the Muftis have displayed spiritual (Roohaani) bankruptcy. They appear to be bereft of Khauf-e-Ilaahi (Fear for Allah Ta’ala/Taqwa), hence they have so audaciously and stupidly legalized something (the drama/TV show) which consists of several major (Kabeerah) sins. To soothe their conscience and to display expertise, the Muftis have cited Fiqhi principles without having correctly understood the import and the incumbent conditions for the applicability of the Fiqhi principle.

Pictures

Pictures of animate objects – people and animals – are haraam by the Consensus of the Sahaabah and all the Fuqaha of all the Math-habs from the era of Khairul Quroon. Regardless of the method of production, pictures of animate objects are Haraam. Whether the method is drawing by hand, painting, by pen, by camera or by any means whatsoever, such pictures remain haraam. A haraam picture does not become halaal if the method of production differs from the method which had existed during the age of the Sahaabah. Thus, the picture produced by the camera or by digital process or by any other method still to be developed by technology will be haraam.

Only morons who are bereft of fear for Allah Ta’ala stupidly claim that digital and TV pictures are permissible. To understand the prohibition of pictures, be such pictures digital, expertise in academic knowledge is not necessary. Even a layman will understand the reality of a digital picture provided he has sincerity and he does not seek justification for the purpose of gratifying carnal lust and perpetrating the sin. Only those whose brains are convoluted with shaitaaniyat and nafsaaniyat moronically deny the reality of the prohibition of pictures regardless if the method of production is the digital process or by the camera. Brains which are jarred by Satanism into imbalance shamelessly aver that a digital picture is not a picture. They have absolutely no logical argument for their stupid claim of a digital picture not being a picture. It is therefore absolutely satanic for muftis to claim that digital pictures are not pictures.

The claim that there is difference of opinion among the Ulama regarding the prohibition of digital pictures is stupid and false. Moronic difference has no validity in the Shariah. If some or most scholars today say that pork is now halaal in view of it not being the same type of diseased pork prohibited by Islam, then such satanism will remain satanism, and no amount of fatwas by a whole world full of muftis will be able to halaalize pork. Similarly, if the vast majority of scholars claim that Vodka is permissible because it is not the type of khamr (grape wine) prohibited by the Qur’aan, then obviously such a stupid difference will be rejected and understood to be Satanism.

The difference of the ‘ulama’ who legalize digital pictures is not valid in the Shariah. It has absolutely no status in the Shariah other than it being baseless and haraam. As far as the Ulama-e-Haqq are concerned, there is consensus on the prohibition of digital pictures and pictures made by any more technologically advanced method than the digital process. Now when the Shariah has explicitly prohibited pictures of animate objects, then regardless of even thousands of maajin muftis issuing fatwas to legalize this major sin, all their fatwas will be fit for the waste. Such fatwas as Jamiatur Rasheed has disgorged in its abortive attempt to halaalize the major sin, are the effluvium of the nafs. There is no difference of opinion regarding the prohibition of all kinds of pictures, including the prohibition of digital pictures.

Scope for permissibility

The ‘scope for permissibility’ averred by the three muftis is the hallucination of molvis gone astray. It is the baseless opinion of the ulama-e-soo’ (evil scholars). There is absolutely no scope for permissibility for an act which Allah Ta’ala and His Rasool (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) have prohibited. In this regard, the Qur’aan states:

“It is not proper for a Mu’min nor for a Mu’minah to have any choice whatever in any of their affairs when Allah and His Rasool have decided it.”

The opinion of the three muftis is putrid, invalid and baseless. It is devoid of Shar’i substance. It is the product of intentional, self-imposed stupidity for the sake of gratification of the nafs and for soothing the nafsaani palates of the liberals and zindeeqs masquerading as Muslims.

Depiction of Islamic history

The depiction of Islamic history and a smattering or even an abundance of the history of the Khilaafat of the Ottoman Empire in no way whatsoever is a licence for halaalizing one of the worst kabeerah sins. Acquisition of knowledge, and that too such knowledge which is not compulsory, may not be pursued via haraam avenues. Haraam methods are shaitaaniyat, and shaitaan has adorned and beautified haraam for the maajin muftis who have lost their Imaani and Deeni bearings. It is not possible for a man of even secular intelligence even if he is an atheist to utter the rubbish of a digital picture not being a picture. Only men on whose brains Iblees has urinated are capable of disgorging such nonsense.

If anyone is interested in Islamic history, mounds of books on this subject are available in all languages. The method of gaining knowledge of Islam’s history is not haraam media and methods.

The Youth

‘Youth’ is another western hallucination imposed on muftis and Muslims in general who suffer from inferiority complexes which are diseases which the western colonial masters have infused into the brains of their subjects. Thus, we find today all strata of Muslim society in every Muslim country insanely adopting western culture in every aspect and field of life. Even the molvis, muftis and shaikhs suffer from this satanic malady.

The profuse regurgitation of the word, ‘youth’ by stupid Muslims has rendered it stupidly monotonous. They mention the ‘youth’ as if it is some sort of idol/deity which should be worshipped and pandered to. The moron muftis lick the boots of modernity and westernism to appease the jaahil so-called ‘muslim’ intelligentsia. They lean over backwards in stupid exercises of bootlicking and truckling thereby piling compound humiliation on themselves. These fatwas are designed to show to the world of juhala that “we muftis” are ‘progressive’ in terms of the western ideology of atheistic life.

Stupid so-called ‘deeni’ personnel – molvis, sheikhs and maajin muftis – have developed the penchant of dangling in front of the Muslim Ummah the chimera of ‘youth’, as if it is some sacred determinant for deciding Deeni issues, for legalizing explicit haraam practices. Now these muftis of Jamiatur Rasheed are moronically and monotonously citing the incongruity of ‘youth’ as if it is some Shar’i daleel for the halaalization of major sins and haraam. What has constrained these muftis to introduce the laughable dimension of the ‘youth’? What relationship does this stupidity have with the hurmat of tasaaweer?

If the evil of pictures is halaal on the basis of it being digital productions, then what is the need to introduce other arguments to bolster the digital picture permissibility? Without the stupid ‘youth daleel’, it will suffice to say that the shaitaani drama is permissible since digital pictures are permissible. What is the need of constructing a meandering edifice consisting of a maze of labyrinthal ‘proofs’ to bolster the ludicrous claim of the permissibility of the haraam, immoral television picture-show? Since these muftis have opined the permissibility of haraam pictures, what need constrained them to bolster their corrupt fatwa with the ‘youth’, the principle of ‘dhuroorat’, etc.?

Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed: “In fact, man has insight over his nafs even though he presents excuses.” Since they are unable to convince even themselves regarding the hallucinated validity of their digitable mirage, they deem it expedient to present other flapdoodle figments of ‘proofs’ to accord some superficial credibility for their permissibility averment. But whatever they have produced by way of ‘daleel’ is devoid of Shar’i substance.

The youth cannot be educated by means of haraam. Indulgence in haraam only compounds the evil of the youth. They contaminate further their decomposed hearts by gratifying their nafs with the haraam fisq and fujoor displayed on the screen. They commit zina of the eyes and mind looking at the pictures of the females portrayed on the screen, and so to the females by viewing the pictures of men. What has happened to the Aql of these muftis of Jamiatur Rasheed? Only vermiculated brains are capable of purveying falsehood and baatil, and presenting it as laudable permissibility for the guidance of Muslims.

Aham Dhuroorat

The miscreant muftis boldly assert that because of the aham dhuroorat (dire and pressing need), the haraam drama show is permissible. Firstly, why hallucinate a ‘dire need’ when the satanic show is permissible in terms of their ludicrous digital argument? What is the need to fabricate permissibility on the basis of the principle of dhuroorat?

Let it be known that something which is haraam becomes temporarily permissible on the basis of the Shar’i principle of dhuroorat (dire need). By introducing this principle, the muftis have contradicted themselves with their permissibility view. The principle of dhuroorat is not adopted to render a permissibility more permissible. Its action is to render a haraam act permissible in view of the dire need. But from the perspective of the muftis, the drama show is permissible from the very inception since they have opined the permissibility of the pictures portrayed in the satanic show. Thus, there is no need for arguing the case on the basis of dhuroorat, for it (i.e. dhuroorat) pre-supposes hurmat, i.e. the issue for which it (i.e. dhuroorat) has been introduced is haraam, and there is a dire need for upsetting or cancelling the hurmat ruling. The incongruity of the fatwa should therefore be quite evident.

Furthermore, it is quite clear that these muftis lack understanding of the principle of dhuroorat. They have failed to understand the Shar’i conception of dire need which legalize prohibitions. It will serve them beneficially to refer to the kutub to re-study the Shar’i meaning of dhuroorat. There is no such dire need to legalize the haraam drama stupidity. The shaitaani television show is not an Imaan-saver. If the hallucinated youth are hovering on the brink of kufr or if their Imaan has already been eliminated, the drama show designed to gratify the nafs will not save their Imaan.

A dire need halaalizes even pork and liquor. But the dhuroorat here is to stave off death due to starvation and non-availability of any halaal alternative. Starvation is a valid ground for the introduction of the Fiqhi principle.

Pictures of females

The Jamiatur Rasheed muftis acknowledge the display of haraam female images despite their digital argument. They are constrained to concede that looking at these female images is haraam. However, they seek to overcome this zina evil by stupidly advising the fussaaq and fujjaar to lower their gaze and not look at the females on the screen. Even kuffaar will accept that the brains of these muftis are convoluted by some process of satanic vermiculation.

Whilst the Qur’aan Majeed commands: “Do not approach even near to zina”, these maajin muftis advise and encourage the fussaaq youth to enter into the den of zina, but to lower their gaze. Is this acceptable and feasible? Will any person whose Aql is not malfunctioning believe that the fussaaq youth viewing a nafsaani television show will turn away their gazes each time a female’s image turns up on the screen? These muftis appear to be village muftis. They should confine themselves to the affairs of rural villages which they may better understand. Just imagine the ludicrousness of the suggestion! The youth should sit watching a show in which pictures of women appear, but only divert their gaze.

Furthermore, the prohibition of staring at ghair mahrams is not confined to males. Females too have to observe the same command. They too may not look at ghair mahram males. The Qur’aan Majeed directs the command to both males and females. Is it intelligent to believe that the fussaaq and the faasiqaat viewing the drama show which has been designed to satanically titillate the nafs, will divert their gazes throughout the show whenever the opposite sex appears? Perhaps baboons will believe in this hallucinatory proposition of the muftis.

Dafa’ madharrat…

This principle means that warding off harm has priority over gaining benefit. If one is confronted by harm and benefit – haraam and halaal, then in terms of this principle it is manifestly obvious to abandon the harmful and the haraam act. In the background of the dhuroorat principle mentioned earlier, and which the muftis had presented as a daleel for permissibility, it is superfluous to present this Dafa’ madharrat….issue. This principle recedes into oblivion when the rule of dhuroorat becomes permissible and applicable. Now when the muftis have argued the existence of dhuroorat, they contradict themselves with the Dafa’ madharrat rule. They do not know whether they are coming or going. They have to learn first to distinguish between right and left before they can qualify for the sacred post and function of Iftaa’.

Fear of evil gazes

The muftis aver that if there is fear of bad nazri (zina gazing), then in this case it will not be permissible to view the drama show. This is indeed a stupid acquittal unexpected of muftis. It is not an issue of a possibility of bad nazri. The bad nazri is a 100% certitude. How is it possible to avoid bad nazri when people bereft of Taqwa intentionally gaze at zina filth? Even Buzrugs are not safe from nafsaani and shaitaani depredations when they lower their guard of Imaani inhibition by flagrantly violating the Prohibition of Allah Azza Wa Jal. Are these muftis so stupid that they are unaware of the many cases of Buzrugs falling into the zina trap of Iblees because they had reposed trust on their nafs, lowered their guard by ignoring the safety measures commanded by Allah Ta’ala for our own protection?

Shaitaan had the fullest confidence in his own piety, hence he fell and was transformed into Iblees, Laeen and Mardood. Reposing confidence on one’s own supposed spiritual stamina and taqwa, is the way of Iblees, and it is this accursed way which the muftis of this baatil fatwa have advised.

We have thoroughly debunked the digital arguments of Mufti Taqi and of other deviated molvis and sheikhs. Several booklets have been published on this issue. These are on our website and also available in hard copies.

The fatwa issued by the muftis of Jamiatur Rasheed is baseless, devoid of Shar’i worth, and academically unsound. It opens the door to great fitnah in the same way as Mufti Taqi Uthmaani has opened the door of fisq and fujoor by proclaiming haraam pictures to be halaal. Do not be deceived with their stupid, donkey arguments by means of which they seek to convince the unwary and ignorant of their ridiculous and stupid claim that a digital picture is not a picture.

Shaikh al-Akbar, Mohiuddin ibn Arabi Rahmatullah Alaihi, in his book “FUTOOHAT AL MAKKIYA”, writes about “Rijaal ullah” (The MEN of ALLAH), and confidently states that there are only three types of them and no fourth! After detailed description of the first two types, he turns his attention to the third type, and praises them with such glorious words “Lahum tabqatul ulya” (these are the best of all). Please note that this praise is coming from Imam ul Auliya, and no less than a person who is known as “SHAIKH AKBAR” amongst sufis.

Now let us see how Shaikh al Akbar describes these people:

1) As far as salaat is concerned, they do no more the FARA’IZ and RAWATEB (i.e. sunan-e-muakkada after farz salat). One will never find them involved in nawafil.

2) Not only salat, but even in the rest of Deeni requirements, and the rest of the Fara’iz they keep to the bare essentials, and no more.

3) The way they do these Fara’iz they try to do as the common people, no distinction can be found between them and a common Mu`min.

4) They wander in bazaars like common people, and involved in small talks common to the rest of the people, one will never find any “Arifaana Rumooz” in their discussions.

5) They deliberately try to be seen as commoners and no different than Awaam (general public)

6) Their clothing is similar to the tradition of the common working class people of the area they live in.

7) They never specify a place for themselves in the masjid, they keep themselves along with the crowd.

8) They are never known for karamat, people consider them no more than ordinary people, sometimes not even up to the level of ordinary Saliheen.

DESPITE THEIR APPEARANCES:

1) In the depths of their hearts they are connected to Allah Ta’ala in such a way, as if there is nothing except ALLAH in their Batin

2) In this particular Sifat, i.e. their inner connection to Allah Ta’ala, they are so firm, so concentrated and so determined, that nothing can move their attention away from Allah Subhana wa Ta’ala.

3) Their constant effort remains to keep their relation of “’Uboodiyat” with their creator fresh, evergreen, and never out of their sight.

4) They are always under the intense realization (Istihzaar) of the grandeur of Allah Ta’ala; their extreme helplessness, total dependency, complete misery in front of their creator is always in front of their eyes, resulting in utter lack of pride, a feeling of absolute nothingness and total annihilation of ego.

5) Their eyes are always on the Creator even for the smallest of their needs, despite that, they obey all the rules of “alam e asbab” without fail; the reality that everything been done by Allah Rabbul ‘Izzat is never hidden from their eyes

Shaikh Akbar thinks —

“THEY ARE THE HIGHEST TABQA OF AHLULLAH, THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE MASTERS OF THE TRUE TARIQA, THEY ARE CLOSEST TO ALLAH SUB-HANA WA TAA’ALA, THEY ARE THE BEST, NOW, AND IN FUTURE,

Hakeem-ul-Ummat Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi Rahmatullah Alaih writes;

“In the terminology of Sufis a group whose physical deeds are limited only to faraez, but their “Deeds of the Heart” (A’maale qalbiya) are more, are called QALANDAR. And the deeds of the heart are those in which Qalb is constantly kept attentive to Allah Subhana wa Ta’ala,keep love of Muslims in heart, most of the time keep one’s heart busy in remembrance of Allah Subhana wa Ta’ala, for example SABAR is a batini amal, similarly SHUKR is a batini amal, RAZA BIL QAZA is a Batini amal. These are not visible, but those who practice these and other such amaal, are constantly becoming closer and more closer to Allah. Subhana wa Ta’ala”.

Similarly Niyyat (intention) is a batini amal, when one practices it his whole life become Ibadah, for example, early in the morning going to office for his duty, if one makes an intention of “Rizqe halal” plus “earning for his family” plus “service to humanity”….his whole day is spend in Ibadah, even if one is apparently involved in worldly things.

Care in observing Sunnah in daily routines with correct intention is highest Ibadah, for example, we have to wear shirt anyway, why not put right sleeve first and left sleeve second, and same with shoes; but remove the left shoe first and right second. We have to wear shoes anyway.

These are just 2 examples. (A good reference book for similar Sunnah is Uswa-e-Rasool-e-Akram by Dr. Abdul Hayy Al Aarefi (Rahmatullah Alaih)

The purpose of writing this post is this: “If someone thinks that he is so busy that he cannot spare time for Roohani mujahidaat, the way of Allah Subhana wa Ta’ala is open to all”

All the praise is for Allah Alone. We praise Him, seek His assistance and beseech Him for His Forgiveness. We seek refuge with Allah from the evils of our own souls and from the evils of our actions. Whomsoever Allah Most High guides, there is none who can lead him astray, and whomsoever Allah Most High sends astray there is no one who can guide him. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah Alone, Who has no partner, and I testify that our Nabi Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam is the Slave and Messenger of Allah. May Allah bestow His choicest Salutations, Peace and Blessings on our Nabi Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi wasallam), his family and his companions.

“Oh you who believe fear Allah how He ought to be feared and do not die except in a state of submission to Allah as Muslims.

Oh people fear your Lord who created you from a single being and from him created his spouse and from the two of them brought forth men and women in abundance.

Fear Allah through Whom you ask your mutual rights and keep the family ties. Indeed Allah is ever watchful over you.

Oh you who believe fear Allah and speak a word that is true and just, Allah will rectify for you your deeds and forgive you your sins.

And whoever obeys Allah and His messenger has attained the ultimate success.

Indeed the truest of speech is the speech of Allah and the best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi wasallam) and the worst of affairs are innovations in the Deen and every such innovation is a heresy, a Bid’ah and every Bid’ah is misguidance and every misguidance is in the fire. We ask that Allah Ta’ala save us all from the fire.

O Muslims! It has recently been circulated in the news and the social networks some pictures and some information regarding a ‘Nikaah’ that took place between a ‘Muslim’ woman and a Hindu man. Attending this Nikaah, being present in it and taking the stage was one of the most senior of the Mashaaikh of this city, or from the people who are considered to be from the most senior of the Mashaaikh of South Africa, the former president of the MJC Shaykh Ebrahim Gabriels. The daughter who got married, the Muslimah, is the daughter of the former premier of the Western Cape, Ebrahim Rasool. A Muslim woman was marrying a kaafir mushrik.

What is the ruling on this as many people have become confused due to the attendance of the Mashaaikh, due to seeing their Shaykh being present and their Shaykh taking the stage and participating in this activity. This is a very dangerous affair. An example is being set, a precedent is being set. When the ulama maintain silence and those in attendance are pleased and participate, what message is it giving to our youth? What message is it giving to our daughters and to our sisters? That you can go and marry the enemies of Allah, the enemies of Al-Islam. Not only from the kuffaar but from those kuffaar who hate Islam the most, from the Hindus, the idol worshippers. Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala has informed us that those who hate the Believers the most, are the Jews and the people of shirk. They hate the Believers the most because Islam fights shirk. Islam is the Deen of Tawhid. So, the mushrikoon – the people who worship idols and associate partners with Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala – hate the believers the most along with the Yahood upon whom is Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’la’s Wrath.

If nothing is said about this and people are led to believe that this is ok, SubhaanAllah, what will Muslim sisters do? How much should we fear for our daughters when they see the likes of this? As Muslims who believe in the Book of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala, we say that this Nikaah is baatil. This Nikaah is baatil and the ulama are agreed that if the woman knows the ruling on this Nikaah and she still contracts it with a mushrik or a kaafir then she is a zaaniyah who is deserving of the Shar’i punishment.

If she knows what is the ruling in Islam for women to marry kuffaar and she still marries a kaafir, she is an adulterous. (In fact she is a murtaddah – The Majlis) And if she does not know the ruling then she will be excused on account of her ignorance but it is Waajib to separate them without any formal separation like Talaaq or Fasakh because that Nikaah was baatil in the first place. There is no need for formal separation. (In a flagrant violation of the Shariah on an issue of this nature, the woman is not excused. She has sufficient intelligence to understand the notoriety of ‘marrying’ a mushrik and participating in customs of flagrant shirk and kufr.- The Majlis)

It is Waajib upon the Muslim community, the Wali of this woman, to separate her from this man without any formal process. (The Muslim community has no coercive power to enforce the Shariah. The Wali himself has become a murtad. Hence, then question of separating the woman from the zina and kufr relationship cannot be practically enforced in this country – The Majlis).

Shaykh-ul-Islam, Ibn Taymiyyah said the Muslims have consensus – the entire Ummah is in agreement, Subhaan Allah! – when the ulama use this term and they don’t say Ajma’ul Ulama, they say Ajma’ul Muslimoon, then this is a matter known to every Muslim. This is a matter known by necessity to all Muslims. It is common knowledge for us. The Muslimoon are agreed that the kaafir does not leave a Muslim as his heir. There is no inheritance between the two. It is not permitted for a disbelieving man to marry a believing woman. The Muslims are agreed upon this as stated by Shaykh-ul-Islam, Ibn Taymiyyah, in Fataawal Kubra. Why is this consensus found amongst the Muslims? Because Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala has made it clear in His Book, because Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala has stated it without any ambiguity in His Book. Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala has said to the believing men:

“You Believing men, do not marry a mushrik female – a polytheist, a pagan, an idol worshipper, one who makes shirk with Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala – do not marry the mushrikaat until they believe”.

Until they believe in Allah, and in His Nabi and in the Deen of Islam – do not marry them otherwise.

“And a slave woman who is a believer is better than a mushrik free woman.”

She is better than a polytheist who is free and who is wealthy and who has status and who has authority. A slave – a believing slave woman is better than her “…even if she appeals to you with her beauty (or with her status or with her wealth)”.

Then Allah said to the believing males, to the fathers, to the Auliya of the women, to their guardians in this Ummah, “…Do not give your daughters (or your sisters or those under your authority from the believing women) to the Mushrikeen”- to the polytheist. Do not give them in marriage to them “…until they believe” – until they believe in Allah and in His Deen and His Nabi (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) – until they become Muslims.

“And a believing slave (who has nothing and who is owned by someone and who is under someone’s authority) is better than a free mushrik even if he amazes you (even if he is the most beautiful mushrik, even if he has the wealthiest, hold the highest status and is from the highest family. A believing slave is better than him.”

Then Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala makes it clear to us believers why this great difference:

“Those people are calling to Hell Fire whilst Allah is calling to Paradise and to Forgiveness with His Permission.”

Those people – the Mushrikeen – are calling you to Hell Fire, and Allah is calling you to Jannah and to forgiveness.

“And He makes clear His signs, He makes clear His verses to the people so that they may take heed.”

The ruling is clear in the Book of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala. The Muslims are agreed upon it, there is consensus upon it and Allah Ta’ala has made it so clear so that people can take heed, and people can reflect, and they can remember, they can recall it. So when the likes of these situations arise, we recall the Aayaat of Allah and we remember it and we take heed and we put it above everything else. And Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala said in Suratul Baqarah and Suratul Mumtahinah with regards to the believing women when they depart from the mushriks, whereas they were with them before and they were from them before, Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala says:

“O you who believe! When the believing women come to you (as immigrants), having made Hijra from the Mushriks because they believed, they’ve received the message and they come to the Muslims…” Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala says “…test them”, ascertain their Imaan, ascertain that they are believers in Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala and in His Deen, and that they have truly come with the purpose of Hijra. Then Allah says:

“Allah knows best with regards to their Imaan.”

You must test them, Allah knows best.

“And if you come to know that they are Mu’minaat (that they are believers) then don’t send them back to the disbelievers. They are not permissible for them as wives, and those disbelievers, they are not permissible for them as husbands”.

Clear is the Qur’aan, the Book of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala, which speaks the truth. SubhaanAllah, the ruling is clear. It is not permissible for a Muslim woman to marry a non-muslim man, whether he is a Yahoodi or a Nasraani or any other kaafir, or any other disbeliever – Hindu or Zoroastrian, Majoosi or whatever he may be. If he is not a Muslim, it is not permitted for a Muslim woman to marry him. This is the ruling of the Book of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala. This is the ruling of Islam.

As for those who oppose it – as for those who are pleased with this kufr (they are murtaddeen). In the Book of Allah, kufr shown towards the Aayaat of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala that is, rejecting it, overlooking (and over-riding it), throwing behind our backs, and doing the opposite – it is kufr. Subhaan Allah! How many verses – (numerous Aayaat declare this attitude to be kufr). In the same Suratul Mumtahina Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala says:

“Oh you who believe don’t take My enemies and your enemies as Auliya (as friends, as allies) showing to them affection and love whilst they have disbelieved in what has come to you of truth”.

How do you find it in yourself to take as an ally and to show love and affection and attachment to the one who disbelieves in what has come to you from Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala – who disbelieves in Allah, who disbelieves in His messenger, who disbelieves in His Book, in His Signs, in His Tawheed? How do you show love to such a person? How do you take him as an ally, as a friend when Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala has prohibited you from doing so?

This matter is very dangerous because the one who is pleased with this, the one who makes this permissible or who justifies it, is guilty of an act of kufr. If he makes it permissible saying that these people – the Hindus or whatever other mushrikoon – they are not kuffaar as you believe kuffaar, then he is a kaafir.

Then we say to them, there is consensus of the ulama, of former times and contemporary, upon the principle of the Shari’a, and this is a principle with regards to At-Takfeer (Declaring one to be a kaafir), and this principle is that: Man shakka fee kufril kaafir…… (Whoever doubts in the kufr of a kaafir has committed kufr).

Imaam Nawawi (Rahmatullah alayh) said in Raudhatut-Taalibeen: “Whoever does not declare a disbeliever (someone who practices a religion other than Islam) a kaafir, or he refrains from giving a ruling with regards to them, or he doubts with regards to their kufr, or he says that their way is also correct, he is a kaafir even if he professes Islam and claims to believe it.”

Whoever does not declare a person who follows a religion other than Islam as a disbeliever or he refrains from giving a judgment with regards to them, or he doubts with regards to the fact that they are disbelievers or he considers and declares their way correct, then that person is a kaafir even if he displays overtly Islam and claims to believe it. Imaam Nawawi says he is a kaafir. Likewise, Al Qaadhi Iyaadh al Maaliki said almost exactly the words of Imaam An-Nawawi.

This is not something new, so that when the ulama, like Shaykh Bin baaz and Shaykh-ul-Islam al-Mujaddid and, others besides them from the Ulama of Islam, say Mal lam Yukaffiril Kaafir Fa Huwa Kaafir, this is not something new. This is not something that they have innovated. This is the ruling of the Shari’ah. This is the ruling known to the ulama. The Hindus are kuffaar and Allah Ta’ala prohibits that the Muslim woman is sent to be with the kuffaar. And Allah says it is not halaal for the Muslim woman to be married to a kaafir or to a mushrik. Whoever says the opposite, then he disbelieves in the Book of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala. Whoever says it is permissible, then he has made halaal what Allah has made haraam regardless of whoever he may be, whether he is the Shaykh that was present or whether it is the father of the girl that permitted them or other Imaams who were present, or whom they consulted. If he made halaal for the Muslim woman to marry a mushrik Hindu man, then he has made halaal what Allah has made haraam and that is kufr. That is disbelief! That is disbelief! (its kufr and irtidaad).

They always come up with excuses to justify their haraam acts. “When you see kufr in your presence and you don’t say anything and you don’t do anything and you don’t feel bad in your heart but you smile and you enjoy the food and you drink the drinks and you sing along with them, this is an indication that you are pleased with what is happening. And whoever is pleased with kufr, he has disbelieved. Whoever is pleased with disbelief, he has himself disbelieved.

SubhaanAllah, this affair is dangerous. We’ve always heard this happens amongst the Awaam (the general public) – amongst people who are ignorant. Wallaahi! We have heard this! Wallaahi! We’ve dealt with it. A Muslim woman is married to John. A Muslim woman is married to Craig, to Regan, whatever the case may be. And we have to go and give the rulings of Islam and separate them. But when, SubhaanAllah, the Mashaaikh, and the leaders of the Mashaaikh and the elders of the Mashaaikh and those who are perceived to be leaders, are part of this – Wallaahi we have nothing for them except the words of Rasulullah SallAllahu Alayhe Wasallam:

“I only fear for my Ummah the misguiding leaders”.

The misguiding Imaams. SubhaanAllah, people look to them for guidance and they are taking people to the fire of Jahannam. They are taking people to the fire of Jahannam.

Slaves of Allah! You must not doubt. You must not be weak. You must not make hesitate to proclaim the truth in a matter the Qur’aan and Sunnah have stated clearly. In a matter that Rasulullah (SallAllahu alayhi wasallam) has implemented and practiced – in a matter that the ulama of Islam and the Muslims have consensus, you must not be weak. What is the ruling on this (haram affair)? It is kufr! What is the ruling on this Nikaah? This Nikaah is baatil! This Nikaah is baatil! And if they knew and the woman knew what is the ruling of Islam, she is a zaaniyah, and if she didn’t know, then she is excused due to ignorance and the two of them must be separated. (Regarding this issue she cannot plead ignorance, hence she is not excused from the commission of kufr and irtidaad. –The Majlis) Her father must separate them, not give her to a mushrik, SubhaanAllah! (her father himself have become a murtad. He is proud of the Hindu marriage and the customs of the idolaters – The Majlis)

Our daughters, Subhaan Allah!, the bondswomen and the slaves, the female slaves of Allah, the female believers – we must protect them. We must be their guardians. The men are the guardians of women. How can you not look where you are putting your daughter? You have descended to such a low level as to give her to a Hindu? You don’t give her to a faasiq Muslim nor to a kaafir from Ahlul Kitaab – a Yahoodi or Nasraani – but you give her to the worst – to the mushrikoon, with the people of idolatry and shirk who ascribe partners unto Allah Tabaaraka Wa Ta’ala and worship idols besides Him. Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala! Where is your Islam? What do you believe regarding Islam? How do you believe in that Qur’aan wherein Allah Ta’ala prohibited this deed? You’ve thrown the Qur’aan behind your back because you think that you have position and status. SubhaanAllah!

And those who flocked to participate, to be in the lime light for prestige and honour? Wallaahi that’s not honour, it’s a disgrace. That leader, that Shaykh who sits on the stage whilst this takes place and participates in it, Wallaahi he was not honoured by that gathering, he was disgraced by it. He was disgraced by it. He is not fit to lead the Muslims. He is not fit to lead the Muslims. (He is a murtad). How many people has he misled with this misguidance? How many people are going to say its ok because Shaykh Fulaan was there? How many people are going to do it because he was part of that? (Part of the haram shaitaaniyat, kufr and irtidaad.)

We ask that Allah protects us from these evil misguiding Imaams, callers to the doors of Jahannam. This is the reality, they are callers to the doors of Jahannam and Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi Wasallam) described them as such. We ask Allah to protect us, to protect our families and our children, to protect our daughters and our sons from these misguiding leaders, and that Allah establishes them firmly on His Book and the Sunnah of His Messenger (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam), and that Allah saves them from these fitan, from the trials and tribulations which are apparent and that which are hidden.

Slaves of Allah! We fear for the Imaan of those people who participate in the likes of such misdeeds. We fear for the Imaan of those people who are pleased with it. We fear for the Imaan of those people who take as allies and as friends and protectors, the enemies of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala, who disbelieved in that which has come from Allah as truth. Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala says:

“You will not find people believing in Allah and the Last Day showing love, showing affection to those who oppose Allah and His Rasool, whether it be their fathers, or their sons, or their brothers, or their next of kin”.

You will not find people who believe in Allah and the Last Day that they show love for those who oppose Allah and His Messenger. Shaykh-al-Allaama-al-Fawzaan (Hafidhallahu Wa Ta’ala) said that this means that if a person shows love and affection to the enemies of Allah and to the kuffaar and the Mushrikeen, does not have true Imaan! He does not have true Imaan! He does not have true faith! Because Allah says and Allah speaks the Haqq and Allah knows the creation and Allah knows the state of everyone better than he knows himself – and Allah says:

“You will not find people who believe in Allah and the Last Day that they have love for those who oppose Allah and his Rasool even if it be his father, or his son or his brother or his next of kin”

Even if it is his entire family – he will not have love for them. Why! Because those are the people whom Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala in whose hearts Allah has embedded Imaan. He, Himself has aided them. Those people who have true Imaan and do not show love and affection to the kuffaar, Allah Ta’ala does not say don’t be good to them. If they are not enemies to you, if they do not fight you, if they do not counter your Deen (then be good, fair and just to them). Allah Ta’ala does not say don’t be just, don’t be fair to them. But Allah prohibits that you take them as Auliya. Allah prohibits that you show love to them. If you give a Muslim woman in marriage to a Mushrik, you are taking him as friend. Is that not taking them as your beloved? Whereas this is a mushrik who opposes Allah and His Rasool. You will not find this occurring from people who have true Imaan because people who have true Imaan and who love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah, they are the ones in whose hearts Allah has stamped Imaan. So you cannot love someone who opposes Allah. How do you love someone who opposes and has enmity for the one that you are supposed to love the most – that you are suppose to love more than all creation? It is in fact a sign of deficient Imaan, that the Imaan is extremely weak.

We ask that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala guides and protects us, and that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala saves us from the misguiding Imaams, and that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala makes us from those who command virtue and prohibit evil, and change it with the hand or with the tongue or with the heart. We ask that Allah Ta’ala does not make us of those whose hearts are not stirred when he sees disbelief in Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala and enmity towards Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala. We ask that Allah saves our youth, the males and the females, and that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala grants those who are not married from them righteous pious wives and husbands. and that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala strengthens the community of the Ahlus-Sunnah, and strengthens the Ahlus Sunnah-wal-Jamaat with more of the community. We ask that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala makes us true rightly guided guides for mankind and that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala makes our hearts firm upon His Deen and turns our hearts towards his obedience. We ask that Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala not to deviate our hearts after he has guided us and that he grants us mercy. Verily He is Al-Wahhaab. We ask Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala to grant us goodness in this dunya, and the goodness of the Aakhirat and to save us from the punishment of the Hellfire. Aameen!

Immunization/Vaccination is a massive fraud perpetrated by Satanists. It is a dark, bizarre and grotesque conspiracy. It is a multi-billion dollar industry of the Satanists whose satanic objective besides the boodle, is the decimation of the people of the so-called third world countries to enable the West to pirate the natural resources of the richest countries of the world – the lands of Arabia, Africa and Asia which are all rich in natural resources of all kinds.

The multi-billionaires who have established the satanic vaccination industry and who are campaigning for mass immunization of the people of the third world countries, save their own children from the dangers and disasters of vaccination. Read the following article for better understanding of the dark plot of the Satanists.

HEALTH, 19 Feb 2018 Baxter Dmitry | Your News Wire – TRANSCEND Media Service The physician who served as Bill Gates’ private doctor in Seattle in the 1990s says the Microsoft founder and vaccine proponent “refused to vaccinate his own children” when they were young.

7 Feb 2018 – “I don’t know if he had them vaccinated as adults, but I can tell you he point blank refused to vaccinate them as children,” the physician said at a behind closed doors medical symposium in Seattle, adding “They were gorgeous kids, really smart and vivacious, and he said they would be OK as it was, they didn’t need any shots.”The comments caused a stir among physicians at the symposium with claims he was breaking doctor-patient confidentiality, according to reports. However as he was speaking to other physicians, he was not breaking the industry code of conduct.

Gates has three children with his wife Melinda – Jennifer, Rory and Phoebe – born between 1996 and 2002, and according to his former doctor, they are all unvaccinated and healthy. The news that Bill Gates does not vaccinate his own children,despite being the world’s most active campaigner for mandatory vaccinations, should come as no surprise. Studies prove that the elite do not vaccinate their children. But at the same time they expect the masses to have their children vaccinated.

THE ELITE DO NOT VACCINATE

In California, the children most likely to be unvaccinated are white and come from the wealthiest families in Los Angeles, according to a recent study. The percentage of kindergartners with state-issued personal belief exemptions doubled from 2007 to 2013, from 1.54% to 3.06%. That’s about 17,000 of the wealthiest children, out of more than half a million, opting out of receiving vaccinations.

Vaccine exemption percentages were highest in mostly white, high-income neighborhoods such as Orange County, Santa Barbara and parts of the Bay Area, according to CNN. The study, which was published in the American Journal of Public Heath, looked at more than 6,200 California schools and found vaccine exemptions were twice as common among kindergartners attending private institutions.

“Very rich and privileged parents like the idea of herd immunity, but they don’t want to take the risks associated with vaccinations when it comes to their own children. They are worried about adverse reactions including autism.”(End of report)

Now why would the world’s most active campaigner for mandatory vaccination refuse to have his children vaccinated? There is no conundrum underlying the vaccination farce and fraud. Bill Gates and his cohorts are fully aware of the horrendous consequences of vaccination, Stupid lackeys of the West such as the Pakistani government and all other regimes in the third world countries, bootlicking the West have all become entrapped in this satanic vaccination project.

Moron molvis in Pakistan and elsewhere, without understanding head or tail of vaccination conspiratorial project, are proclaiming the virtues of this bizarre satanic practice in truckling obedience to the evil regime of that unfortunate country. Millions of people have been subjugated to the disease consequences of immunization. These Satanists are fully aware of the horrors of vaccination. It is for this reason that they do not allow their children to be vaccinated. This is the attitude of Satanists which even Muslims are acclaiming as virtue. While the vaccine Satanists are believed to be philanthropists with altruistic motives, they are in fact the worst plotting devils who harbour deep hatred for humanity from which they exclude their own children.

The news of Bill Gates and others of his ilk protecting their children from vaccination should serve as a sufficient eye opener for the morons who have been ensnared into the satanic, murderous cauldron of vaccination.

Maulana Rahmatullah Kayranvi (may Allah have mercy on him) (1818-1891) – the Indian origin scholar of the Islamic sciences including jurisprudence best known for his magnum opus ‘Izhar ul Huq or The Truth Revealed!‘ was a honorable warrior in the battle for freedom (also known as the Sepoy Mutiny or The 1857 Uprising) from the British occupied India which took place in 1857. The uprising failed due to various reasons, and Maulana Kayranvi who also happens to be a descendant of the third caliph of Muslims, Caliph Usman bin Affan (may Allah be pleased with him) migrated to Makkah Mukarramah via Mocha, Yemen (where he arrived aboard a ship from Bombay, India). He actually walked the distance of about 600 miles (970 kilometers) from Mocha, Yemen to Makkah which took him about 2 years !!

After having migrated to the sacred land, he intended to set up an Islamic seminary but scarcity of resources proved to be a real hurdle.

Then the help of Allah subhanahu wa ta’ala descended.

Begum Sawlatunnisa (may Allah have mercy on her), a woman known for her generosity and a descendant of the pious Muslim ruler of the erstwhile kingdom of Mysore in South India, Hadrath Tipu Sultan (may Allah have mercy on him) (1750-1799) who fought against the hegemony of the English till his last breath (he died a martyr on the battlefield fighting against them in the fourth Anglo Mysore war) and who is said to be the descendant of the tribe of Quraish of Makkah (the tribe the last Prophet of God, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) belonged to) happened to visit the Holy land (probably for the pilgrimage) around that time.

While there, she received news regarding the setting up of the institution. She supported the proposal and donated a considerable amount of 30,000 (currency is not known, even though 30,000 rupees at that time too would have been a lot of money) for the noble cause. It was then that Maulana Rahmatullah Kayranvi attributed the school to her and named it ‘Madrasah Sawlatiyya’ (founded in 1875 / 1292 H) which continues to exist even to this day (a span of 142 years at the time of posting this article) and tens of thousands have been educated in the Islamic sciences since then.

“He who guides to what is good will have a reward equivalent to that of him who acts upon it” (Mishkaat Shariff, No. 209)

Maulana Kayranvi passed away 16 years later in 1891. Not much is known about Begum Sawlattunnisa after this, not even her death. Probably, she’ll be nothing more than a mere footnote in the pages of history. Yet, in the light of the Glorious Quran and the above Ahadith among many, I leave it to you to calculate the rewards they have and continue to acquire in the hereafter.

* * *

References:

1. مسلمان خواتین کی دینی اور علمی خدمات

2. Pg. No. 208, ‘Leading Ladies Who Made a Difference in the Lives of Others’ by Mufti Abdul Qadir.

3. Pg. No. 36, ‘Women and Waqf – A Series of Translations on Philanthropic and Voluntary Work’ by Imam Mohammad Al Humaidan, Dept. of Studies and External Relations (Kuwait Awqaf Public Foundation).

Presenting a character sketch of the evil scholars for dollars and the lovers of name and fame (the ulama-e-soo’), Imaam Ghazaali (Rahmatullah alayh) states in his Kitaab, Faslut Tafraqah Bainas Islam waz Zandaqah:

“Know that the reality of kufr and Imaan, and their definition, Haqq (the Truth of Islam) and Dhalaal (Deviation) and their natures do not become conspicuous for hearts filthied by hankering after fame and wealth and their love. But, these realities are revealed to the hearts firstly purified of the pollution of the filth of the world, then polished with perfect spirituality, then brightened with pure Thikr, then nourished with valid contemplation, then beautified with the limits of the Shariah so that they (the purified hearts) are permeated with the Noor (celestial and spiritual radiance) emanating from the Niche of Nubuwwat. Thus, they (these purified hearts) become like glittering mirrors. They become the lanterns of Imaan radiating anwaar.

How is it possible for the spiritual mysteries to unravel for people (ulama-e-soo’) whose vain desires have deflected them (from the Haqq); whose god is their rulers (sultans, kings and the like); whose qiblah is gold and silver; whose shariah is their evil flippancy; whose thikr is their evil devilish ideas (shaitaani wasaawis); whose treasure is their (nafsaani) vermin, and whose contemplation is the fabrication of schemes which their villainy demands.

How is it possible for these (vermin) to differentiate between the darkness of kufr and the glitter of Imaan? Their hearts have not been purified from the contaminations of the world. Their capital in knowledge is the rules of najaasat and the like.” (End of Imaam Ghazaali’s characterization of the ulama-e-soo’)

In fact these juhala-e-soo’ of our era are ignorant of even the masaa-il of Istinja. While the Ummah is ablaze and burning with fisq, fujoor, bid’ah and kufr, and groveling in squalor, extreme poverty and ignorance, these vile vermin molvis and sheikhs, indulge in merrymaking functions of futility, singing, devouring carrion, gluttony and excreting the effluvium of their gluttony.

Amid the heart-rending suffering of the decadent Ummah, these evil molvies and sheikhs squander millions of dollars of the Ummah’s trust funds in baatil accords, conferences and symposiums bootlicking the rulers and mutilating the Deen to appease the oppressive regimes and kings who bestow stupid accolades and financial perks to the vermin truckling at their feet. They satanically squander the trust funds jetting around the globe, enjoying themselves in 5 star hotels and in other nafsaani indulgences whilst their hearts incrementally become harder by the day. They are bereft of any pity and feelings of brotherhood for the suffering masses of the Ummah. That is why they are so obese. Their bodies are nourished with haraam, hence in terms of the Hadith, Jahannam has a greater claim over them.

They strike up dalliances with kuffaar and mushrikeen in the kufr interfaith shaitaani movement. They convert Musaajid into temples. They utilize Musaajid for entertaining the public with songs. They pollute and violate the sanctity of the Musaajid with droves of kuffaar tourists wallowing in physical and spiritual najaasat. They stare amorously with their carnal lusts at the ill-clad kuffaar women in the Musaajid. They join evil sporting clubs, and they organize sporting teams in the names of Musaajid. They teach Bukhaari Shareef and Qur’aan Tafseer in their Darul Ulooms, yet they have kuffaar sportsfield at their institutions. Their Bukhaari students run around the field like baboons in bermudas and T-shirts. Can such vermin ever become Warathatul Ambiya? They halaalize carrion, riba and alcohol. In brief, they are rotten inwards and outwards – rotten to the core, and they peddle all their rot in the name of the Deen. This is the Rot to which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) referred:

“Soon shall there dawn an age when nothing of Islam will remain except its name. Nothing of the Qur’aan will remain but its text. Their Musaajid will be ornate structures devoid of hidaayat. Their Ulama will be the worst under the canopy of the sky. From them will percolate fitnah, and the fitnah will rebound on them (and hem them in).”

A true Shaikh commented that under the canopy of the sky there are also the Yahood, Nasaara, mushrikeen, apes and swines. From this observation, the category of the juhala-e-soo’ (the evil sheikhs and molvies) will be understood.

No group of mankind has damaged the Deen and ruined the Ummah as much as the ulama-e-soo’- the likes of the sheikhs and molvies of the MJC, NNB jamiat, the Trinity of Iblees, Dajjaals such as Tariq Jameel and the rest of the vile scholars for dollars who operate Madaaris and other Deeni institutions solely for the acquisition of worldly and nafsaani objectives.

They overtly present ‘deeni’ goals whilst covertly they utilize the acts of the Deen for the acquisition of worldly objections. All of them are Signs of Qiyaamah and the fulfilment of the predictions of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).