Central Asian

Next, you develop this idea, you end up saying, "Our way of recovery – from below." By and large, you're right, without a creative, grassroots voluntary work will not be created the blossoming of the country. Read additional details here: NY museums . But is small and insignificant role in the capital 'Vitality of the country and in the vitality of its culture? " From time immemorial, the legislature was in capitals. Another thing – the executive power. It is scattered across the country, but were accountable to the capital again. This is something that concerns a single state with its capital city, one people and the sole legislative and executive branches. But all this does not exist currently in Russia. After all Russia is divided (and it was fixed Constitutionally) to the subjects of the federation, more than half of whom are public entities with their national Constitution, the President, the legislative and executive power, in name only subordinate to the Federal government.

Good or bad? For these states themselves in the state it's pretty good: you can dictate their terms to the center, scaring the constant threat of withdrawal from the Federation in the event of failure requirements (a kind of political blackmail), but on the other hand – do not bear any responsibility for the economic, financial, legal and social status of its citizens, referring to his "servile" position, determined by the "center." Resembles the situation when a thief stole a purse itself loudly shouting: "Stop thief!". And yet, given the available in the Russian Federation territorial division of the national (I emphasize – with national) of the Federation, let me quote excerpts from a newspaper article "Central Asian underbelly" on "a democratic government that provides rights and freedoms of its citizens at the level of internationally recognized standards. " I quote: "The originality of democracy in any country should be determined by the mentality of the people, national traditions and customs.