Monthly Archives: July 2014

The spirit of the creative mind is being dissolved by virtue of public institutions. Liberal institutions eventually shed their revolutionary and progressive or freedom expanding drives in order to adopt the tyrannical mold of the previous regime they seek to replace.

The technocracy controls the populations through various advancements in medical technology that is sold as a potential treatment for a serious condition like brain chips for Alzheimer’s disease, or the new Google contact lens with a camera inside that will aid the blind.

The state will produce a new religion with the intent of creating a renaissance, or new golden age. Some manifestations of the new religion are apparent in the transhumanist movement and the prophesy of the singularity. These are also outgrowths of the supposed green economy and the new eugenics movement cloaked in bio ethics.

In the midst of the new paradigm, both the systems of spirituality and whichever condition results from the singularity will be in competition for the elevation or destruction of the rights and souls of man.

Abortion became a loving liberal accepted phenomenon associated with women’s liberation from an “oppressive patriarchy”, promoted by religious zealots. The solution being a guided responsible family planning facade, the implication being that Planned Parenthood’s brand of liberation was a superior alternative to adoption; adoption is listed on the Planned Parenthood website, but it is the only possibility that suggests a woman could be heavily pressured or tricked into it.

Liberal Democrats, who are gung-ho about civil rights are also the most enthusiastic about literally killing off their constituency before they are even born.

Don’t forget the words of Rev. Leonard Childress of blackgenocide.org:

“The most dangerous place for an African American is in the womb.”

Minority babies in America are being aborted at a higher rate than whites, they are not safe from the deranged eugenicists who are dedicated to the elimination of the “inferior sub-humans”.

It is now considered the right of a woman to abort a baby based on the child’s sex. How is this possible? It really isn’t surprising considering how the death culture has conditioned the people over time, yes, a long-term agenda carried out over the course of decades in order to radically alter human values, through socially engineering the collective consciousness to accept wholesale death.

This is accomplished by indoctrinating the children to believe in resource scarcity based on overpopulation. This strategy is further implemented based on the assumption that humans are a disease, who need to be eradicated in order to save the planet.

There are many depopulation methods employed by the elites to carry out their agenda: sterilization, and abortion are the favorite methods used by the scientific dictatorship.

When the origins of Planned Parenthood are brought up,some people exclaim:

“Margaret Sanger?!?! But that was a long time ago! SHE can’t be used to show how Planned Parenthood is a nefarious eugenics death cult!”

They protest with trembling cries and flushed, tear stained cheeks:

“More evidence needs to be brought up about eugenics!”

Remember, their liberal sensibilities have been offended by the blasphemy of anyone daring to question their beloved idol, the sacred pillar of their secular humanist cult has been desecrated; with an effort, they continue to pout through voice-cracking sobs:

“Sure,” They readily confess. “Sanger was a deranged psychopath obviously bent on the elimination of the ‘lesser races’ in an effort to pave the way for the Aryan superman, but she is dead now, and her malicious hatred can no longer harm us from the safety of our glorious liberal paradise where the air is sweet and a gentle melody always plays in the background.”

Keep in mind, constant reader, that Sanger’s goal was a long-term plan to infiltrate the various liberal movements, her efforts were echoed by Zibigniew Brzezinski in his book Between Two Ages, and his official government memo about the black leftists where he describes the need to infiltrate these groups to control them because they all represented a threat to the establishment.

Many people forget Kissinger’s NSSM 220 memo which outlined a massive depopulation effort aimed at the third world countries to control them because they also threatened the establishment.

These plans are not things that lasted a few years, and were merely scrapped—these are long-term policies that continue to the present, and instead of dissipating over time, they became bigger. The public was conditioned to believe that sterilizing third world populations was a benevolent effort to save the planet.

False environmental movements designed to justify mass-murder via a seemingly innocuous depopulation agenda and De-industrialization for the earth.

The rise of a state-run dogmatic religion under the guise of a liberating and reason inspired philosophy, which was the necessary outgrowth of a covert neo eugenics movement designed to depopulate the planet to make way for the rise of the new superhuman.

History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes, and the gruesome composition created by the elites exhibits all the signs of a horrendous regime designed to snuff out the last bits of freedom forever in the ultimate revolution.

And for those who equate tyranny with Soviet Russia, and Nazi German, those who look for something similar, and are convinced we no longer need a constitution because the tyranny that inspired World War II “was like forever ago”, the mentality those people possess is very naïve and needs to be avoided like the plague.

The tyranny will come in the form of a smiling group clad in rainbow garb who will claim to give more rights, to free everyone from restrictive social mores—trading liberty for freedom to optimize security all for the greater good.

There is a huge divide in the libertarian party that is rarely discussed. This unspoken argument continues to weigh down those who are concerned with individual liberties.

The discussion is muddled with semantics, and meaningless labels. The realm of politics has been reduced to theater, and people have been conditioned to accept a diminished level of participation.

The issue of true liberalism is never properly articulated in the public forum. This stems from a general ignorance of classical liberalism verses modern day conservatism.

At this point, it is important to note that language in politics serves little purpose but to confuse, and has generally become ineffective for having a true debate. Genuine debate becomes stifled because of a serious inability to have meaningful conversations where both people involved in the discussion understand each others’ point because the language has been so drastically altered.

There are several different schools of thought in the libertarian realm, and it is most assuredly not an accident that these things are withheld from corporate-controlled media sanitized talking points.

Similar to the variety of Republicans that exist across the conservative spectrum, there are also many shades of libertarian philosophy. The tensions that are prevalent continue to plague the liberty movement mostly from a failure to realize the bigger picture.

Libertarianism appeals to many people across the party lines because of the emphasis on personal freedom, but the idea of true freedom with all its implications is a bitter pill to swallow for most because it suggests little to no government intervention. The real concept of a private citizen has been almost completely removed from the public mind. Domestication, social engineering practices have become the practices of the state to maintain control.

The private citizen ideal is now a foreign principal that few would recognize, and less would understand if it was able to manifest unfettered. In a truly liberal system the people are elevated above the government. The state is not supposed to be some god-like entity with unquestioned psychotic authority, but it is actually an instrument of the people.

“When the people fear the government there is tyranny and when the government fears the people there is liberty.”

The question of sacrificing liberty for security is not some impending decision America is on the verge of making, it has already been decided and it was a slow collective lobotomy orchestrated under the guise of progressiveness.

The real issue that more often than not gets diluted is that it is really about liberty verses tyranny. There’s going to be disagreements about certain issues like abortion, euthanasia, marriage, and drugs, etc.

This may be heresy, but Ayn Rand’s objectivist philosophy is not the be-all-end-all of libertarianism.

If the public is duped into being defined by these issues at the expense of striving for an overall state of legitimate classical liberalism then the tyrannical control freaks will always win by virtue of their ability to take advantage of people’s good will.

For example if people start saying, Rand Paul is a sell-out because of a stance on a certain issue like immigration and they effectively neglect his long record of liberty-minded policy then that must be examined as a symptom of corporate-controlled media propaganda designed to divide the people and create more in-fighting as a hedge against serious liberty growing at the grass roots level.

Rand Paul gets labeled an “isolationist” all the time, and somehow this term has been morphed to equate with a general sense of detachment from reality, the assumption being that if America ceases to have a policing presence in the world then all the country’s will collapse under the threat of terrorism, when nothing could be farther from the truth. The same liberal democrats that are criticizing Paul for wanting to reform America’s foreign policy were the same “conspiracy theorists” during the Bush years who questioned the legality of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

All in all everyone has to maintain a sense of perspective and refrain from getting locked into this senseless left right debate. Populist candidates like Rand Paul will always be painted as old fashioned racist conspiracy theorists, but the key to decoding the corporate propaganda, which will cleverly appeal to people in a manner that promises to grant more freedom to the people by means of some draconian liberal reform, is to gauge the end goal of the message—does the result of the promise empower the people, or is it simply a more oppressive measure decorated in pretty speeches? It will quickly become clear if the person in question supports liberty or tyranny.