No sorry, common sense is siding on one side of the equation, that any Youtuber can say anything doesn't make the what he says have any merit
whatsoever. If he was so informed and talented he wouldn't be wasting his life making Youtube videos. One would think a production company would do
that for him, like Michio Kaku or Bill Nye, the Science Guy. Really? Holy crap!

Oh yes, we are all well trained. We must take sides... left vs. right, blue vs. red, hoax vs. reality, truth vs. lie.

Nothing is simply interesting or worth more time to consider. We must accept or deny now and we must base our positions on the evidence available at
this moment, regardless of its value... or lack of it, lol.

But hey, it's your call to make. You can choose to believe whatever suits you. That's the beauty and the dangers of the process you just denied

Whats there not to buy? We've shown pictures side by side compared to that shown in the video. You think if this had any bit of credibility it would
have exploded around the world by now right? Or is that the big old bad MSM suppressing news again? I have news guys, we are all humans.... humans
want attention.. humans want money... journalists are humans.... journalists want attention... journalists want money. Proof there is a base on the
moon would give both to that journalist. If this were real, a journalist with a reputation for accuracy would announce this to the world.

Originally posted by redoubt
It is also a notable curiosity how we approach the subject of hoaxes.

If someone says they have a video of a UFO, we have our doubts. But the moment someone claims a hoax or a debunkery, we all go 'Ahhh!' as if one
side is more believable than the next.

Just because someone says something is real, doesn't make it real.
Just because someone says something is a hoax, doesn't make it a hoax.

It's all about planting seeds of doubt and watching them grow.

The original YouTube uploader is the person who planted seeds of doubt by trying to fool us by claiming that this picture was a brand-new picture from
the Chinese when it was actually taken from a 45-year old NASA picture.

Once the original YouTube uploaders's lie was uncovered, the seeds of doubt planted by the YouTube uploader began to grow.

All I suggested was the coincidence in the NASA site astronomy picture of the day , which showed a picture of the moon one day then shows a mining rig
the next , what has a mining rig got to do with astronomy ?

Anyways , who is to say that the parts werent assembled on the moon ?
you completely made out that I suggested the entire mining rig was launched whole into space
by a rocket !

Even I know that is logistically impossible due to its size , dont suggest im that stupid man ,
its quite rude.

Are you honestly suggesting that its not possible they could transport , this unit in sections
to be reassembled on the moon ?
It is possible

Looked back at page 2 no it hasn't been debunked i couldn't find it , lets see and wait what happens if the guy on youtube will release the real
source.

Actually you need to go to page 3 first post by Zarniwoop that should be where you start,because obviously you haven't read the thread from the
beginning. Also the OP has even admitted that this.....

Not at all honestly I'm ignorant on space subjects I had no idea and have read your post on the third page just now, so its a hoax? I can't answer
the question you posted but I just found the video really interesting.

page 6 3/4 way down the page.

How much more do you need to read or see that something smells fishy here?

Hasn't anyone wondered why the OP hasn't been back on to actually defend the video from it being called a hoax in the rest of this thread?

All I suggested was the coincidence in the NASA site astronomy picture of the day , which showed a picture of the moon one day then shows a mining rig
the next , what has a mining rig got to do with astronomy ?

Anyways , who is to say that the parts werent assembled on the moon ?
you completely made out that I suggested the entire mining rig was launched whole into space
by a rocket !

Even I know that is logistically impossible due to its size , dont suggest im that stupid man ,
its quite rude.

Are you honestly suggesting that its not possible they could transport , this unit in sections
to be reassembled on the moon ?
It is possible

Then who funded all of those moon launches, and lunar life support systems. 27 million pounds is alone 260 moon shots from Saturn V rockets themselves
weigh in on the pad just under 6 million pounds. You seriously can't entertain the idea that hundreds of Saturn V rocket launches have taken place
without anyone in the astronomy community noticing???!!!!

WOW! is right..these type of machines are just massive! I have a book on earth moving machines and the largest of these is the O&K BWE 292, completed
in 1991. This is the biggest one listed in this book. Maybe bigger ones now.

Highest point- 292ft
weight- 29,754,000lbs (14,877ton)
This machine , at the time, had state of the art computer software installed, which enabled it to learn, and make sudden changes, depending on how the
ground conditions were.
Impressive!!

Originally posted by The Shrike
The question that always has to be asked are the alleged lunar aliens so dumb that they would actually manufacture surface structures so that their
nearby neighbor would keep sending satellites to photograph and map the moon's surface? I think not.

www.abovetopsecret.com...www.abovetopsecret.com... Lunar surface, Neil Armstrong
>>God, what is that out there?... What the h... is that???... But this is
unbelievable!...Whats there?>Whats there? Mission Control calling Apollo 11...>These "Babies"
are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there, Lined up on the far side of the
crater edge! They're on the Moon watching us!>What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?>It was incredible, of course we had always known there
was a possibility, the fact is, we were warned off! (by the Aliens). There was never any question then of a space station or a moon city.>How do you
mean "warned off"?>I can't go into details, except to say that their ships were far superior to ours both in size and technology - Boy, were they big!
and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station.>But NASA had other missions after Apollo 11?>Naturally - NASA was committed at that time,
and couldn't risk panic on Earth. But it really was a quick scoop and back again.>Hey, this is
ours!

Interesting pictures really. I've always wondered, IF NASA is actually hiding pictures of Moon bases and structures. The question that arose each
time I asked myself, was Why hide them?. What's the point of hiding stuff like moon bases and other anomalies.

If I worked for NASA back in the early days(I don't or didn't but let's pretend) I'd edit photos to SHOW bases, then Milk the Gov't funding that
would flow our way, well not milk it, but use it to build better and faster 'shuttles' and replace them sooner with newer and faster ones. Even if
they found my doctored photos in 2012, I'd probably be dead. And they would STILL have awesome space craft!

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.