Players that missed from 6 meters or less: Hazard,Alonso,Fabregas,Christensenx2....All these things will come back as goals next month, same happened to Liverpool they were playing well but the ball wasn't going in at first.

2

History

Showing previous versions of this text.

2018-01-10 21:55:36

Players that missed from 6 meters of less: Hazard,Alonso,Fabregas,Christensenx2....All these thing will come back as goals next month, same happened to Liverpool they were playing well but the ball wasn't going in at first.

2018-01-10 21:55:36

Players that missed from 6 meters of less: Hazard,Alonso,Fabregas,Christensenx2....All these things will come back as goals next month, same happened to Liverpool they were playing well but the ball wasn't going in at first.

I disagree man, if there was contact then definitely it should be a free kick but all the angles that were shown to us were terrible which made it hard to see if there was contact or not. Most of all he should have went down straight away if there was contact but decided to only go down when he realised the ball was going out. Personally I think if there was contact then it's 100% a pen or if there was no contact and he's claiming there was then he should be booked but neither happened so that's the only thing that makes the decision look questionable. As for the VAR assistant he has all the angles and we don't so maybe there wasn't any contact, who knows. They certainly don't need to show us the proof they just have to show the FA although it would be nice if we could see it too.

It finally no longer matters what anyone thinks about the decisions which are viewed by the VAR, because they see what we see and they are professionals at their job whilst we arent. I will therefore agree with their decisions.

3

History

Showing previous versions of this text.

2018-01-10 22:49:15

It finally no longer matters what anyone thinks about the decisions which are viewed by the VAR, because they see what we see and they are professionals at their job. I will therefore agree with their decisions.

@kante_shoot his point is that Hazards actual penalty and Moses foul had very similar touches. But the same people arguing over the decision that Hazard deserves the penalty are saying that AMN did not deserve pk, though the touch was the same.

@amir_keal I understood what quikzyyy was getting at before I made my post and didn't need it pointed out but thanks anyway. Just in case you didn't understand what I meant in my post basically I also said it was a pen as it was similar to the hazard pen but I too couldn't understand why it was not given. but the big difference was we were shown a lot of good camera angles for Hazards pen but all awful ones for Niles pen which also made it harder for us normal folk to make a fair call as we only get to see what's broadcast whereas the VAR assistant has them all (and that place would be filled with cameras) so they can make a better call on wether it was a foul or not. Also nobody had replied to @quikzyyys origanal post before I started writing mine and when I finished there were 2 replies

but yeah @amir_keal there can and always will be bias against referees decisions which sometimes can be justified especially when there's been 3 successive games with penalty shouts first one not being a pen, hazards being an extremely soft pen and this one being too hard to tell with shitty camera angles but no one can say it was a pen or not besides the VAR assistance this time. Also @quikzyyy said all the people who said the hazard pen was a pen now "THINK" (not saying atow) that this one isn't. But anyone intelligent enough will know they can't make the call with the shitty camera angles we were given and the blame for that goes to the editor.