Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

I’d have thought it was an amazing ability to not learn lessons from her mistakes.

More to the point, it was learning the wrong lessons while passing the buck on any real responsibility for those mistakes.

“Shattered” made a pointed observation that Hillary was relying on her campaign team to craft the message to be spread, not really understanding that the campaign’s message has to flow organically from the candidate. That her first instinct regarding her campaign slogan was to push “I’m With Her” showed the depth of her entitlement complex, and that her running for President was solely about her decades-long self-aggrandizement rather than any vision or devotion she had to the country as a whole.

Her interview yesterday was a fantastic example of her overall lack of accountability and the extent to which her party has fully absorbed identity politics, blaming everything that goes wrong on white people.

She’s probably right, but it was everything about Libya that cinched it for me.

I’ve loathed Hillary since 1992, but I’ve loathed the Donald since 1986. In 2008, I actually preferred Hillary to the other guys. But after Libya, no way could I vote for the warmonger who lied the US into the conflict, cackled over the brutalization of its dictator, and then lied over and over again about Benghazi.

The private e-mail system was really small change when compared to the fact that, when Hillary has opportunity, she is a murderous bitch.

I saw her interview yesterday morning. The big takeaway was how she is still hanging on to to the “it was everyone else’s fault but mine” line. I guess it’s really hard to change after all these years.

Notice how they call a legal process as ‘loopholes’. They’re not loopholes; they’re legal perks for people having taken risks. Morneau is your typical left-wing jerk off with shell corporations and off shore accounts.

“The Washington football team name mocks and insults Native Americans and does not deserve to be associated with the proud and welcoming city of Washington, D.C.,” Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) said in a statement today. “By kowtowing to Daniel Snyder, the National Football League (NFL) is equally complicit in his team’s shameful use of a racist slur that has no place in today’s society.”

“The team name will eventually change, so I urge Commissioner Roger Goodell ? and the NFL’s 31 other team owners ? to do the right thing and exert pressure on Mr. Snyder so that this embarrassing era in American sports may finally end,” she said.

There’s an organization here in Norfolk called Hope House. They run a group home for adults with mental retardation and other severe cognitive disabilities; they also have a thrift store where some of their higher-functioning clients can go during the day to work, because everybody needs to feel that they have a purpose in life and are doing something useful.

“I don’t know quite what audience he was playing to, other than– maybe some, you know, right-wing commentators, right-wing members of Congress, whatever,” Clinton said.

What is it called when you’re accused of playing both sides of the fence but instead of trying to please each side you’re angering each side. Comey, hopefully unintentionally, seems to have achieved this rare feat.

Left-wing agitators have falsely labeled conservative commentator Ben Shapiro a “white supremacist,” in an apparent attempt to inflame tensions ahead of Shapiro’s speech at the University of California, Berkeley on Thursday.

Shapiro, the editor in chief of The Daily Wire, is an Orthodox Jew and a vocal opponent of the alt-right and other fringe white nationalist groups. Nevertheless, Refuse Fascism, a group that has previously organized violent demonstrations in Berkeley, labeled Shapiro a “fascist thug” and “white supremacist” over the weekend.

“Fascist thug [and] white supremacist Ben Shapiro is coming to UC Berkeley ? The issue is not ‘Free Speech,'” the group wrote in a Facebook post. “The Issue is Fascism.”

Maybe not, but I think “supporting free speech, and offering those who disagree with and hate you a forum to debate their ideas equally alongside yours in an open and honest forum” would be a rare professional choice for a fascist.

Even though the game is rigged, she still lost because of free elections. Another reason why Nanny-Staters like Hillary want to get rid of elections, juries, the Constitution, and any other check and balance to these life-long politician’s power.

Hillary, in her own retarded way, did us a favor by making it fully clear that her party is reflexively anti-white. Tony admitted a few days ago that Hispanics are now the party’s most important constituency, and because they’ve spent the last 40 or so years pandering to minorities ever since the New Left took over the Dems, they obviously feel that there won’t be any political fallout from openly blaming white people for everything that goes wrong. It’s basically the Howard Zinn philosophy as a party platform.

The Swiss supermarket chain Coop, to a bit of domestic hoopla, has begun selling burgers and balls made from insects. It’s being billed as a legal first in Europe, a continent more accustomed to steak, sausage, poultry and fish as a source of protein.

She ‘paid a friend to establish a completely unsecured homebrew server in her basement bathroom through which to conduct our nation’s State business, illegally circumventing both the FOIA requirements of the job, and the most basic of security protocols any 1st-week private working in a steel room would be liable to at the penalty of the law’.

Hillary Clinton says the “most important” of her mistakes was “using personal e-mail.”

There is something about committing thousands of counts of at least a few felonies in order to avoid transparency while conducting pay-to-play operations, then lying about it and destroying evidence (also a felony…) that tends to turn people off.

And the most amusing thing about it is that her own hubris wouldn’t allow her to own up to the mistake until long after the fact. Her people were begging her to show contrition about it and instead of heeding their advice, she acted all the way up to the election like it wasn’t a big deal, letting her proxies in the media make excuses for her.

“I mean, look,” she said, “the voters are willing to put up with a certain amount of shenanigans. But I really overdid it. In hindsight, I should have stood aside and allowed the Democrats to nominate someone more electable, like maybe a literal yellow dog.”

“Hillary Clinton says the “most important” of her mistakes was “using personal e-mail.””

And if you read the linked story, you’ll find out she lost because of sexism, racism (she’s 1/4 Indian, right), the Russkis, , bad lunar allignments, navel lint, toe jams, and so forth. According to her. It WASN’T her! Nope, not at all!

“When it comes to federal spending, one thing has become clear over the past month. Republicans and this heartless president, they think about budgets in terms of dollar signs and decimal points, but as I’ve said over and over again, budgets are moral documents. They put on paper the principles and the priorities of the nation,” Lee, a member of the House Budget Committee, said during a press conference on Tuesday held to show support for lifting the FY2018 domestic spending caps.

“They will need to seek compromise and consensus if they are going to govern, which of course is their responsibility as the majority party,” he said. “That means embracing parity and working with Democrats to keep the government open and avoid default.”

They started using the phrase “budgets are moral documents” after the famous poll after the 2004 election which purportedly showed that “values voters” supported Republicans. So the Dems huddled with the pollsters and decided they had to show they had values.

Approval of carpal decoration took off in 2012 when, according to the shopping site Mr Porter, “the sale of men’s accessories skyrocketed, spearheaded by what was then a new trend for men’s bracelets.” Haute bohemians in the pop-cultural community have led the charge: Kanye West, Channing Tatum, David Beckham?you cannot swing a mesh chain without hitting a star who does not favor the style. Most, moreover, find ways to wear them that are more varied, more interesting, and less overdone than the gaudy pirate mode favored by Johnny Depp.

The rules used to state that you should never contrast the beach cool of a bead bracelet with the formality of a business suit. But even those have begun to erode. For instance, I’m sitting here looking at a KitchenAid advertisement in the current issue of a food magazine. The ad is clearly making a pitch to self-styled rebels: The model is wearing a beaded bracelet and a leather wrap bracelet on one arm while the other bastes a hunk of meat in a Le Creuset pot with red wine?brace yourself for this hedonistic vision?poured straight from his glass. “It’s your playground,” the marketing copy proclaims. “You make the rules.”

The New York Post reported last year on the Clintons paying $1.16 million for the three-bedroom, ranch-style home next to their house in Chappaqua. The newspaper’s source said at the time it was thought to be a weekend retreat for their daughter Chelsea’s family.

In an interview from her home on the CBS program “Sunday Morning” delving into her 2016 election defeat, Clinton was asked about the property after she discussed attending President Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Host Jane Pauley noted Clinton had been “so sure” she would be the one giving the inaugural address in January.

“You specifically bought this house for a reason,” Pauley said as they walked outside.

“I did,” Clinton said.

“And this was to be?” Pauley asked.

“Well, I know a lot about what it takes to move a president, and I thought I was going to win,” Clinton said.

“The Clintons had acquired the house next door to accommodate White House staff and security during a second Clinton administration,” Pauley narrated.