Thursday, 21 July 2016

In the beginning was the end and in the end is the shape of things to come.

The forces, routed, have reformed their regiments and renewed
the Long March to 2020.Fahrenheit 451 (Ray Bradbury, 1953)

“We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy."

- Fire Chief, Beatty

Revisionist History:

"Established 1790, to burn English-influenced books in the Colonies. First Fireman: Benjamin Franklin."

- Fireman’s Rulebook

"Do you
ever read any of the books you burn?"

He laughed. "That's against the law!"

"Oh. Of course.”

"You're not like the others.
I've seen a few; I know. When I talk, you look at me. When I said
something about the moon, you looked at the moon, last night. The others would
never do that. The others would walk off and leave me talking. Or threaten
me. No one has time any more for anyone else. You're one of the few
who put up with me. That's why I think it's so strange you're a fireman. It just
doesn't seem right for you, somehow.'"

"I sometimes think drivers
don’t know what grass is, or flowers, because they never see them
slowly. If you showed a driver a green blur, Oh yes! he’d say, that’s
grass! A pink blur! That’s a rose garden! White blurs are houses. Brown blurs
are cows. My uncle drove slowly on a highway once. He drove forty miles per
hour and they jailed him for two days. Isn’t that funny, and sad, too?"

They crashed the front door
and grabbed at a woman, though she was not running, she was not trying to
escape. She was only standing, weaving from side to side, her eyes fixed upon a
nothingness in the wall as if they had struck her a terrible blow upon the
head. Her tongue was moving in her mouth, and her eyes seemed to be trying
to remember something, and then they remembered and her tongue moved again: "Play the man, Master Ridley; we shall this day light such a candle, by
God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out."

How inconvenient! Always before it had been like snuffing a candle. The police
went first and adhesive-taped the victim's mouth and bandaged him off into
their glittering beetle cars, so when you arrived you found an empty house. You
weren't hurting anyone, you were hurting only things! And since things really
couldn't be hurt, since things felt nothing, and things don't scream or
whimper, as this woman might begin to scream and cry out, there was nothing to
tease your conscience later. You were simply cleaning up. Janitorial work,
essentially. Everything to its proper place. Quick with the kerosene! Who's got
a match?

Fahrenheit 452 (Reality Check, 2016)

"The Constitution, as a charter of negative liberties, says what the States can't do to you, says what the Federal Government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do on your behalf."

- Commander in Chief, Obama

Revisionist History:

NHS England's first strategy for end of life care in England, published in 2008, has succeeded in reversing the trend of increasing the proportion of deaths taking place in hospital.

The LCP Review itself stated: “There are no precise ways of
telling accurately when a patient is in the last days of life.”

DNR also provides a moral dilemma. A passive decision to not
intervene to save a life is tantamount, morally, to an active decision to take
a life.

They are being sent home to die...

The final word must go to the Archdeacons of the Pathway,
Chairman Ellershaw et al –

“It might strike lay people as odd, but there is little empirical data onthe physician skill of diagnosing imminent death. It
would appear that muchremains to
be learned.” There is limited evidence in medical literature of howthe dying phase can be identified.- Diagnosing Dying

That said and done, there are those who boldly go where none
have gone before:

We care. We can help you end your life. In Ontario, doctors are being invited to register their interest in providing assistance to die.Federal
legislation, passed on June 17, 2016 has amended the Criminal Code
to permit the taking of life.Active killing is become a medical therapy.Doctors and nurse practitioners in Ontario can now provide medical assistance in dying. There is even a referral service available should there not be a doctor or nurse practitioner available to provide treatment.

Your treatment is your right. You may not be abandoned.And when the swing is complete, it will have gone full circle:

GPs have been dropped between a legal rock and a hard place. While
the Data Protection Act demands that personal data is handled transparently and
held in confidence, the Health and Social Care Act has stated that GPs are legally
required to provide data to the Health and Social Care Information Centre for
the Care.data programme with presumed consent.Presumed consent is the positive rights and negative liberties model. It is the 'deemed consent' model adopted for organ donation in Wales.Care.data pseudonymised and anonymised personal data. Even so...

For purposes of demonstrating to Commissioners 'value for
money', we are required to pseudonymise and anonymise clients data online using reference
numbers instead of names. The reference numbers consist of the Scheme identifier
and the tenancy identifier. Effectively, anyone who is determined to discover the
client’s identity may do so.Care.data pseudonymised and anonymised personal data, likewise, has not been impregnable to anyone determined to source identity.No more...

The NHS announced that the scheme to store all patient data on a single database would be cancelled following the publication of a long-awaited review from Dame Fiona Caldicott, the National Data Guardian (NDG).

In response, NHS England said: “In light of Dame Fiona’s recommendations, NHS England has taken the decision to close the care.data programme. However, the government and the health and care system remain absolutely committed to realising the benefits of sharing information, as an essential part of improving outcomes for patients.“Therefore this work will now be taken forward by the National Information Board, in close collaboration with the primary care community, in order to retain public confidence and to drive better care for patients.”- nhe

The NIB was set up to advise
the Secretary of State for Health on the use of powers to set aside
the common law duty of confidentiality in England where identifiable
patient information is needed and where consent is not practicable.NIB now works in collaboration with the DOH to digitalise the
NHS and tweets as NIB @Health_2020.

The goal is a radical alliance of Health and Social Care to move forward the digital revolution regardless.Whatever impediment there is placed in the path the pathway will be followed...And they are all back where Wee Belong...It is 'not new or additional guidance' for it is only what has gone before they once belonged.

"It builds on legacy work from NHS Improving Quality and provides practical
advice and support for frontline clinicians and leaders on ‘how to’ identify,
lead and implement change for themselves to improve their local services in
collaboration with their local partner organisations across their community."

It is now 'personalised care' but it is the same graphics and annotations.The same questions are asked, the same documents sourced -

Sunday, 19 June 2016

This is all just overboard PC or sounds like it; this is all
just puff ‘n stuff for a MissionStatement –

We have:

•Given due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination,harassment and victimisation, to advance equality ofopportunity, and to foster good relations between peoplewho share a relevant protected characteristic (as citedunder the Equality Act 2010) and those who do not shareit; and

• Given regard to the need to reduce inequalities betweenpatients in access to, and outcomes from healthcareservices and to ensure services are provided in anintegrated way where this might reduce healthinequalities

•We have also given due regard to the responsibility thatCCGs have a duty to actively involve local people asstated in the Health and Social Care Act [2006 amended],2012 Health and Social Care Act (amending the NHS Act2006) c. 7 PART 1 Further provision about clinicalcommissioning groups Section 26 Section 14z(2)1,Health and Social Care (Safety and Quality Act) 20152.

NHS England's first strategy for
end of life care in England,
published in 2008, has succeeded in reversing the trend of increasing the
proportion of deaths taking place in hospital.

The EoLC Strategy actually produced the medical holocaust that
was the LCP.

The EoLC strategy subsequent to the discrediting of the LCP has
been to carry on as before but call it something else and, using EPaCCS,
shunting the punters out the hospital back into the community and, better
still, signed off onto an AD that keeps them in the community setting.Here is NHS England with
"Commissioning person centred end of life care – a toolkit for health and
social care" -

Providing high quality end of life care that is truly
centred around the needs of the individual and their loved ones is an important
outcome to aim for. Given the complexity of ensuring all the patient’s needs
are met, wherever possible, requires all the agencies to work together.

As Lenin might have asked: What is to be done?What is all this obsession about ‘end of life’ care? What about
just basic ‘care’?Let’s look at that statement again with some basic amendments…“Providing high quality end of life care that is truly
centred around the needs of the individual and their loved ones is an important
outcome to aim for. Given the complexity of ensuring all the patient’s needs
are met, wherever possible, requires all the agencies to work together.”THAT should be basic to ALL care. That should be at the heart of
all care. So, why isn’t it?And all that Mission Statement
twaddle above…?Of COURSE there is discrimination. Just ask the Cancer Drugs
Fund why Ibrutinib was suddenly ‘disappeared’ off the NHS website last
November/December!Everyone must have fair and reasonable access to dying but not
fair and reasonable access to living.This is Ambitions for
Palliative and End of Life Care -

The building blocks for achieving these ambitions:

Honest conversations

Person centred care

Helping to take control

Clear expectations

These may be ‘said and dones’ for all care. To single out ‘end
of life’ is discriminatory. Determining ‘end of life’ and ‘diagnosing’
dying is a self-fulfilling prophecy.Ambition statements:

“I live in a
society where I get good end of life care regardless of who I am, where I live
or the circumstances of my life.”

“I live in a society where I get goodend of lifecare
regardless of who I am, where I live or the circumstances of my life.”

These are musts for all care, not just EoL care. But it
isn’t.Forward Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care:

“Death and dying
are inevitable. Palliative and end of life care must be a priority. The quality
and accessibility for this care will affect all of us and it must be made
consistently better for all of us. The needs of people of all ages who are
living with dying, death and bereavement, their families, carers and
communities must be addressed, taking into account their priorities,
preferences and wishes.”

A New Perspective:Death and dying are inevitable; therefore, care is always a priority. The
quality and accessibility for this care will affect all of us and it must be
made consistently better for all of us. In this world 'nothing can be said to
be certain, except death and taxes' [Ben Franklin]. Everyone, of what any age,
is living with dying, death and bereavement. Death does not differentiate;
Death is the ultimate leveller. Therefore treasure life. Treasure the life we
create in the womb. Treasure life until the end of life. Life is too readily
snuffed out. Life is not too readily ‘reassembled’ [Johnny Five]. Life and
concern for life is always paramount because life is precious and living
matters.There is a Foreword in the extended
document -

The Foreword is signed off by –Professor Bee Wee National Clinical Director for End of Life
Care, NHS EnglandDr Jane Collins Chief Executive, Marie Curie

John Powell Policy Lead for End of Life Care Association of
Directors of Adult Social ServicesThe Wee Belong of the Leadership Alliance and her stiff unswerving advocacy of
the LKP is well known to readers of these pages...

The National Palliative and End of Life Care Partnership which
publishes this document includes –National Palliative Care Nurse Consultants GroupReaders of these pages will be acquainted with this group(s) and
their lead, Margaret Kendall...

Review Date: 24 September 2015Next Review: Aug 2016Reviewed by: Jay Over - Resuscitation Officer• A TEP must be completed if the answer to the life expectancy question “Wouldyou be surprised if this patient died within next 6-12 months? is no.• A TEP must be completed for all patients who are at risk of deterioration/cardiac arrest.• The responsibility for making treatment decisions including resuscitation rests with the consultant in charge of the patient’s care.• In the absence of a consultant, other doctors with at least 3 or more years registration with the GMC (deputy) may make these decisions in urgent circumstances for adult patients only; CT1 and above. If there are any doubts about the right course of action, a consultant should always be contacted to discuss what to do.An adult, over 18 years, with capacity can refuse treatment.A patient cannot demand resuscitation which is not clinically indicated.

The Version 4 Decision Record contains
the TEP -The TEP document itself advises use of the GSF Barton Method as
a prompt to enact the TEP.Elsewhere, the document states:

1.3. Nevertheless, it is not an appropriate goal of medicine to prolong life at all costs with no regard to its quality or the burdens of treatment on the patient.

It may sound commendable to say, as this document does, that 'it
is not an appropriate goal of medicine to prolong life at all costs with no
regard to its quality or the burdens of treatment'.However, a decision taken to not act to save a life is tantamount to a decision
taken to take a life...It is a cold and calculating judgement call over-riding the natural emotional
response to plunge in and help -

Over in the States, Affordable Care sounds like it means making
care affordable; it doesn’t. It means what it means on this side of the pond;
making care affordable for the provider, which means rationing care.Rationing care means downsizing treatment expectations.In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes [Ben
Franklin].The circle is come full circle...

Sunday, 22 May 2016

The RCM was established in 1881 as the Matron's Aid or Trained Midwives Registration Society, but has existed under its present name since 1947. In 1881, Vita Donum Dei was the College's slogan, which meant ''Life is the gift of God''. This was an old hymn that midwives used to sing.

The Chief Executive is:

Responsible for the day-to-day running and management of the RCM, the chief executive works with the executive management team to carry out the tactical operations of the organisation working towards the RCM strategic objectives. Cathy Warwick is the current chief executive.

If ‘life is the gift of God’, the taking of life is not something
to be entered into lightly.If God does not enter into your philosophy, still, life is
precious and the moral compass becomes the more steadfast and demanding. The
religious establishment warned that the godless were without any moral
restraint.

The great challenge of Darwinism and the rise of Atheism in the
19th Century asserted that removal of the Divine from the equation
impelled moral judgement to be the more forthright and certain. A Deity is not
necessary to ensure rightness of conduct.Doctrinaire science, the Left and the new atheism were inseparable. The political actor would tread the boards with a pocket watch in hand to challenge God, if there be one, to strike him dead in 30 seconds. The crowd would stand in thrall to watch the inevitable.The seconds ticked by and, marvel upon marvel, the human David was not struck dead and the divine Goliath made not an appearance to accept the challenge.

Owen, the founder of the Natural History Museum, did not
disagree with evolution; Owen could not reconcile the removal of the Divine
fingerprint that Darwinism demanded. His statue stood in the hall on the
landing of the grand staircase of the great institution his efforts had founded
until 2009. It was replaced with the statue of Darwin.

It has been asserted in these pages that it is not a matter of
Right and Left but of right and wrong. Likewise, belief or non-belief - or
disbelief - in a Supreme Being has no bearing on our actions and our moral
comportment.Whether religious or areligious; it is always correctitude which
impels us and correctitude which haunts us.A fellow student at Secondary School ever maintained that his upbringing had been all the more strict exactly because his parents were Atheists. Their Atheism demanded a moral independence from Divine intervention that had to be demonstrated and reflected in their child's comportment of himself.A religious perspective does not necessarily command moral rectitude as may be readily demonstrated by the actions of some members of the Roman Catholic priesthood on one hand and by Islamic Fascists on the other.This is the Daily Mail -

Midwives assist new life into the world, protecting the unborn
and the mother, the bearer of the unborn. They are there to nurture and to heal,
not to kill. That is the task of the Facilitator or Executioner.It is improvident and incongruous somehow; it is unfitting,
surely, that Cathy Warwick should also chair the UK’s biggest
abortion provider, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS).Question: In a democracy, does not the tail wag the dog?Answer: The Chief Executive has made an executive strategic decision over the heads of the membership because that, according to the RCM, is her function.BPAS receives £25 million of public money to carry out 63,000 terminations
a year on behalf of the NHS. Ann Furedi is its £145,000-a-year Chief Executive. As with euthanasia at the other end of the age spectrum, killing is lucrative and rewarding.Her other half, Frank Furedi, revived a revamped RCP in 1978. It was distinguished from its first incarnation by its opposition to state intervention in social and economic life.That husband Frank was a 'founding member of the Revolutionary Communist Party is mentioned in the short bio that accompanies wife Ann's picture. If that has any bearing or consequence on the story is not clear unless the Mail intends this information as if an additional slur to further emphasise and support the case for their argument, as if any were needed.That is no more sensible than were the actions of the Loony Lefties from Rotherham Borough Council who snatched
three children from their happy foster home solely on the grounds that the Foster
Parents' UKIP affiliation was inappropriate and not compatible with having in
their care children of ‘ethnic’ origin. Who, indeed, was the racist in that
case?That is no more sensible than were the actions of the Loony Lefties who found consort with intolerant Muslim activists to lay siege to the school where teacher, Ray Honeyford, taught to pillory him and parody his name: “Ray-cist, Ray-cist”.To cite Frank himself:

Critical judgement of the views of groups that are culturally different from our own is to be avoided, because to be judged is to be damaged. Criticism is psychological violence. All groups in society (except of course one’s own) are to be recognised as “vulnerable”, that is, unable to stand up against the injury of having their views and their culture subject to critical scrutiny.Mary Warnock – Review of 'Therapy Culture'

Who, indeed, was the racist in that case?

We are reaping today the results of that ignorance of the ignorant Left.

I used to have interesting discussions at our project with a visiting fire panel technician of 'ethnic' origin. I would share with him my own childhood experiences of his religion received through the filter of my father's eyes.

My father's time in North Africa during the war were a 'mind opener' for him. The locals he met gave him perspective and insight into their world view and their religion which he shared with his children. He would always say that he was 'C of E' but he would impart to us things like, "They believe in Jesus, too, but Muhammad as Prophet is greater" and "We all - Muslim, Christian and Jew - share the same God".

I would impart this to the visiting technician. He would respond, dogmatic and doctrinaire, inflexible and unwilling to depart from his position: "Of course, the problem that we Muslims have with Christianity is the Cross."

Ray Honeyford got it right.

Why the Mail should mention Ann Furedi's other half at all, apart from the RCP, is further substance that this is intended as a slur to support an argument by implication. It is not taken further nor elaborated upon.

There is a concern, however, that the reviewer quoted above, an admirer of Frank Furedi, is the Baroness Warnock who has discussed a 'duty to die'.

Glaring moral truth deteriorates into an intellectual debate on persons and potential persons, on non-persons and personhood. This has been reported in these pages and, therein lies substance for argument.

Wife Ann states that abortion should be accepted "as an essential method of family planning". Therein lies substance for argument.

Herein lies substance for argument: Society, to function, has to have rules of engagement. If killing, the taking of human life, is wrong then by definition abortion is wrong. The way society has skirted round this issue is to redefine the point at which an unborn human child becomes human, or is even a person.

Wife Ann says ‘on abortion, we trust women’. The ‘We Trust
Women’ campaign was launched in February. The campaign’s aim is to make
abortion just another medical procedure.Problem: Abortion is the taking of a
person’s life (Sections 58 and 59 of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act).

Solution: Redefine the personhood status of the unborn infant.

The 1967 Abortion Act provided exemptions from prosecution to permit abortions to proceed. This was the year Mr. Patrick Gordon Walker made his landmark observations in Parliament...

1967: Fifty years.The social scientists float their ideas for maximum impact. It is done for reason and by design to permit debate to proceed. The campaign plans are unfolding. They wish to scrap the Abortion Act and redefine the status of the unborn infant. They wish to...?

As Helga Kuhse rightly points out, the aim of our article was not that of making an altogether original contribution to the discussion about the moral status of infants. Our intent was rather to draw some conclusions which, in our opinion, had not adequately been spelt out in the past, but which nonetheless seem to follow from what authors like Michael Tooley, Peter Singer, and Jeff McMahan had written. These authors have suggested that newborns do not have a ‘serious right to life’ for reasons related to newborns limited level of neuropsychological development. Our conclusion was that when it comes to striking a balance between the alleged moral status of newborns or their alleged right to life and the interests of existing people, the latter should prevail in the same sense and to the same extent as they are agreed to prevail in the case of abortion. As Kuhse rightly wrote, we took the discussion a step further in that we claimed that parents should be able ‘to seek the death of their healthy newborn infant’ if this significantly affects for the worse their well being or that of existing siblings.

In the case of CP v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in 2014, Lord Justices Dyson and Treacey and Lady Justice King ruled at
the Royal Courts of Justice that a foetus is “not a ‘person’”; rather it is a 'sui generis organism'. Clearly, that decision precluded any possibility that, at any stage, was a human foetus considered a human being with the right to
life.

The Left, traditionally, loves a cause: the defence of a persecuted minority it perceives to be in need of protection. Unborn children, because they are unable to help themselves, are surely a silent minority in need of legal protection.

In 2004, a woman's unborn child was murdered 'terminated' in a French hospital. This isBBC News –

A woman whose pregnancy was wrongly terminated in a French hospital has lost her fight at the European Court to enshrine a foetus' right to life.Mrs Thi-Nho Vo went to the court after French courts said the doctor could not be prosecuted for homicide as the foetus did not have the right to life.She said it had that right under the European Convention on Human Rights.But the Court of Human Rights ruled against her, and involuntary abortion did not constitute manslaughter.

If unborn babes had rights, abortion would be murder.

Abortion, like euthanasia and the Liverpool Care Pathway, is a licence to kill.

Planning for a family is not shopping for children, returning to the store a delivery that was not ordered. A Child is not just a bi-product of sexual union. Just as the child must be taught responsibility, so the parent must take responsibility for the child.

Therein lies substance for argument. Whether religious or areligious; it is always correctitude which impels us and correctitude which haunts us.

Giving up a child, whether through abortion or adoption or surrogacy, cannot be an easy thing. The biological bond impels us and is, also, a source for correctitude.

The instinct to nurture is a drive that impels and which haunts the parent. It may be suppressed or become corrupted but it does not dissipate. The bond and bonding is, according to your belief, either Divine directive or what is coded into the gene to continue survival of the species.

It was not an easy thing for the 19 year old Kim West to give up her child for adoption just one week after he was born. It surely haunted her, such that, 30 years later, when that bond impelled her son to seek her out, she was impelled also to respond.

These days, pseudo-scientific psychologists have all sorts of fancy names for every manner of behaviour. It is lucrative and pays well. In this case, what is clearly the misdirected instinctual emotional bond between parent and child is called GSA (Genetic Sexual Attraction).

Parenthood is always the sum of two parts.

Roots are deep-rooted and written into our genes.They impelled author Alex Haley to write the story of his 'roots'. There is a need to know where we came from. Will 'roots' intrude upon the 'happy family' and impel the gamete or surrogate child to seek out the other part?

There is a hierarchy of influences at work that makes us what we are. There is nature which makes us; there is nurture which grounds us; there is culture which grooms us.

Wife, Ann, has pointed out that granting an abortion on the grounds of sex selection is not breaking the law.

Women give reasons why they want to end their pregnancies, and doctors sign a legal document to confirm that in their honest belief (‘good faith’) their patient meets the legal test – which is that continuation of the pregnancy would likely cause injury to the mental or physical health of the woman. -Spiked

Consideration that the intense cultural pressures on the woman may be immense and certainly such that they may very well give cause for concern for her continued mental and physical well-being may give grounds for agreeing to abortion.

There is a perverse parallel here in the innocuous logic of Baroness Warnock's 'Duty to die'...

Lady Warnock said: "If you're demented, you're wasting people's lives – your family's lives – and you're wasting the resources of the National Health Service."I'm absolutely, fully in agreement with the argument that if pain is insufferable, then someone should be given help to die, but I feel there's a wider argument that if somebody absolutely, desperately wants to die because they're a burden to their family, or the state, then I think they too should be allowed to die."Actually I've just written an article called 'A Duty to Die?' for a Norwegian periodical. I wrote it really suggesting that there's nothing wrong with feeling you ought to do so for the sake of others as well as yourself."She went on: "If you've an advance directive, appointing someone else to act on your behalf, if you become incapacitated, then I think there is a hope that your advocate may say that you would not wish to live in this condition so please try to help her die."I think that's the way the future will go, putting it rather brutally, you'd be licensing people to put others down."- Telegraph

Men and women are, or should be, social equals but, otherwise, they are not 'equal' but different. Difference does not make one better than the other; it just makes them different. It is that difference that has been lost in the feminist drive for equality.

In neglect of the fundamental difference which defines man and woman, Feminism has become a denial of the feminine.

Strength or aptitude is not what defines the difference.

Women can do most anything a man can do but a man cannot bear a child. With difference excluded from the equation, it may very well be that, as Margaret Thatcher said, when woman becomes man's equal she becomes his superior.

Obsession with defining 'equality' without including difference into the equation prejudices judgement. Failure or inability to acknowledge difference creates all manner of ills including Dawkins' determination to put Downs children down.

This is a scientifically-planned society and the social
scientists are beavering away, moulding our lives in plain sight, and yet do we
walk unaware, the fool on the hill, teetering on the edge of oblivion?

Like all sciences, social sciences evolve through the interplay of the ideas and theories of academics and the evidence that supports or refutes them.Social scientists influence our lives usually without us being aware they are doing so.-Economic and Social Research Council

Further reading -

Writing in Spiked, Furedi has accused environmentalists of 'misanthropy' for
supporting cuts in population and economic growth, rather than investment in
technological improvements...

The idea that civilisation is responsible for the perils we face today depicts the human species as the problem, rather than as the maker of solutions. And the most striking manifestation of this anti-humanism is the belief that, if the Earth is to survive, there will have to be a significant reduction in the number of human beings.

This position may appear incongruous with his partner's endeavours; it may be seen that these endeavours are an alternative (final) solution in the slaughter
of the unborn in an abortion holocaust on a par with the medical holocaust that has proceeded over the last decade.

He stands accused by Green activists of being ‘cultish’ and of ‘crypto-Trotskyist
entryism’. Certainly, members of the original RCP disappeared into the Labour
party.

Pernicious and insidious is this a draught spiked with provocative theories and ideas?

This social scientist has set up a driver to slowly infuse ideas into all sides of the body politic, a
persistent force that is relentless in purpose to accomplish an irreversible change
in perception.

Spiked is the curious 'Hell Child' of Living Marxism, intent on giving its own slant on any and every topic. It does become readily apparent that this is a rather odd assortment of people, all a-clamour with their own particular take on the world.

Traditional perceptions have melded such that they are not so readily categorised. Husband Frank attended the World Social Summit in 2008. A fellow 'protagonist' at the summit was French economist, Jacques Attali.

Jacques Attali, leading French intellectual and former President
of the European Bank for reconstruction and development, has said, "As
soon as he goes beyond 60-65 years of age man lives beyond his capacity to
produce, and he costs society a lot of money...euthanasia will be one of the
essential instruments of our future societies."

The WSS was sponsored by Fondazione Roma. According to the EFC
(European Foundation Centre) -

The history of the
Fondazione Roma dates back to 1539 when, in order to fight usury, Pope Paul III
issued an Edict establishing the pawn-broking institution ‘Mount of Piety of
Rome’. The mission was perpetuated through a Rescript issued in 1836 by Pope
Gregory XVI, in response to an initiative of worthy citizens, which then
instituted the savings bank called Cassa di Risparmio di Roma that subsequently
incorporated the Mount of Piety in 1937.

The Fondazione Roma is now a modern 'operating foundation' that
implements projects with 'considerable social impact'.

A housing association has secured £80 million to support construction of social housing and shared ownership.bpha announced it has secured the money, which will support the development of over 850 new social housing and shared ownership homes within the Oxford to Cambridge arc.Over half of the money, £44 million, was raised from the European Investment Bank (EIB) under the Affordable Homes Guarantee Programme.

TheDevo Next submissions are tied in with Berlaymont.The UK dissolution continues with English RSGs.England could never be swallowed whole. Is that theNUTS(Nomenclature des Unités Territoriales Statistiques) and Bolts of it?At our little Supported Housing project, the Commissioners have withdrawn to deliberate and we are left in the Green Room to ponder our fate.All lawyers are ambulance chasers and there is no justice for May.May's daughter continues her struggle for treatment...

About Me

I am distraught and I despair that these events have befallen this family. The picture is of me and my lovely mum, murdered on the NHS (National-socialist Health Service). Murdered. Is that too strong a word? Her life was taken without her permission. By omission and by commission, actions taken and not taken conspired to end her life. She was kept in ignorance of what was proceeding before her very eyes, as were we. Was she, then, not murdered?