Greater Israel: Does it make sense now?
by Abid Ullah Jan
(Wednesday July 19 2006)

"For the Christian Zionists, every rocket that flies into Israel and every bridge that is blown up in Lebanon just brings them one step closer to establishing the dominion of God."

As Israel pounds Gaza and Lebanon simultaneously, there are no signs of diplomacy to halt the conflict. Bush says, “the best way to stop the violence is to understand why the violence occurred in the first place.”[1] Canadian prime minister says, “I think Israel's response under the circumstances has been measured.”[2] Above all, the U.S. vetoed Security Council’s call for a ceasefire.[3] Britain also opposed calling for ceasefire[4] and instead Defense Secretary Des Browne ordered for HMS Illustrious and HMS Bulwark to “make ready” for operations off Lebanon.[5] And Blair accused Syria and Iran.[6]

One would think that the United Nations' demand for a cease-fire would have been the most logical and humanitarian call these diplomats could have possibly made. Many analysts infer to Israeli prime Ministers address to Knesset that Israel is ready for a ceasefire.[7] Nevertheless, signals from the United States are totally different. The New York Times, echoed Hillary Clinton's conviction that all Americans stand behind Israel,[8] giving the impression that Israel has no interest in a ceasefire. Top online headline at CBS and the New York Times on July 18 was: “Israeli general says Lebanon offensive will last weeks.”[9] In Washington, Condoleezza Rice made clear Washington’s position that a ceasefire “won't help.”[10] This is the kind of double-talk that we witnessed during the so-called peace process since early 1990s.

The present role by the U.S. and U.K. is by design. Just when it seemed like neoconservatism was ready for a quiet death, the Zionists provided neoconservatives with an opportunity to get the war they've always dreamed of.

Exerting influence on the Bush administration is a breeze - all it has to be persuaded to do is do nothing. That is exactly the script followed in U.K and Ottawa. Meanwhile the commentators can work the airwaves and drum home the message that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is orchestrating all the chaos across the Middle East. It will only be a matter of time before Washington quietly gives the green light for Israeli jets to go screaming towards Tehran -- at least that's the vision William Kristol, Michael Ledeen and their cohorts believe is almost within their grasp.

The Israeli justifications for the escalation of war make no sense unless looked from a broader perspective. The real aim is total dominance over the Middle East and establishing greater Israel. In the final days, the British Empire paved the way for the creation of a Zionist state. Today, the United States is facilitating the emergence of a Greater Israel at the cost of its empire.

The blame for the current Israeli war falls entirely on Israel's friends, who approve occupation, racism, repression and deployment of inhuman methods in the service Zionists hegemonic designs. Myopic thinking and grand deception on the part of the United States and Israel in the last 13 years have led to the beginning of the present final show down in the Middle East.

For 45 years, 1948-93, Zionists’ strategic vision, brilliant planning, Western technological support, and logistical assistance helped it consolidate a state created without any moral, social, political or legal justification. Created on the basis of terrorism, the Zionist state survived through terror and tyranny.

The first American war on Iraq and the unflinching support of pro-Zionists in the U.S. and Europe made Zionists more confident. They started planning for phase two of the project towards establishing Greater Israel. They rightly concluded they had won round one. The Zionists started round two with gaining as much legitimacy as possible with the deceptive U.S.-led “peace process.” They were aware of the inconvenient fact that they cannot fool all people all the time. They were prepared for the day that is before our eyes today.

Most Arab countries gave up their goal to liberate occupied Arab territories and fell into the trap of ‘land for peace’ rhetoric.

After the first war on Iraq, emotions long held in check, fatigue and hubris, came flooding out in Arab capitals. Deciding that they had had enough of war and could end the war on some face saving terms, Palestinians and other Arabs went for the deceptions of “the peace process” and “disengagement.” None of the promises made to them were kept. They permitted the Zionist state to earn some legitimacy and buy time for amassing more weapons of mass destruction and putting plans in order to materialize phase two of the Zionist plan for establishing greater Israel.

In this mishmash of delusions, appeasement and retreat, Israel rapidly lost the left over fears, came to plan false Flag operation and effectively used the Israel lobby in the United States to a total war and occupation of Iraq.[11] The earlier fear of a United Arab front has been replaced with a disdain that borders on contempt. Despite the cosmetic withdrawal from Gaza strip, Israel’s policies of apartheid and ethnic cleansing continued unabated.

For the Phase two of the Zionist totalitarian design, Israel had to build on this foundation of 13 years. It requires that Israel return to the callous, bloody and terrorist work of war and aggression. That means renouncing the deceptive plans of compromise, the fake hopes for good will, the drama of withdrawals. After more than 120 years of work, Israel is now just one false flag operation away from expanding the war to the remaining hurdles in its way of materializing the dream of a greater Israel.

Three types of visible forces are fully determined to make the Zionist dream of a greater Israel a reality. The forces with unflinching determination are: Zionists, neo-conservatives and Christian radicals.

The neoconservatives have their own Islamophobic agenda. They are looking for a total war on the Muslim world. Israel is just providing them with an excellent opportunity and excuse to bring the United States into the conflict. For example William Kristal writes in Weekly Standard (July 24, 2006):

"Why is this Arab-Israeli war different from all other Arab-Israeli wars? Because it's not an Arab-Israeli war. Most of Israel's traditional Arab enemies have checked out of the current conflict. The governments of Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia are, to say the least, indifferent to the fate of Hamas and Hezbollah. The Palestine Liberation Organization (Fatah) isn't a player. The prime mover behind the terrorist groups who have started this war is a non-Arab state, Iran, which wasn't involved in any of Israel's previous wars…What's happening in the Middle East, then, isn't just another chapter in the Arab-Israeli conflict. What's happening is an Islamist-Israeli war."[12]

Former CIA man James Woolsey, appeared with John Gibson Today and joining in with the neocon chorus he said the U.S. need to attack Syria. He’s said that we are in World War IV since ‘03 as part of a group calling itself “Americans for Victory Over Terrorism.”[13] The group was founded by former Education Secretary William Bennett, who took part in Wednesday’s event along with Paul Bremer, a U.S. ambassador during the Reagan administration and the former chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism.

Former U.S. speaker of the House Newt Gingrich said on July 16 that he believed the United State is “in the early stages of World War III.”[14] Endorsing his statement, the editorial of the Christian magazine Trumpet concluded: “As extreme as it might sound, this observation by Newt Gingrich is the truth.”[15] Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell,[16] believe Israeli hegemony in the Middle East represents the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy about the coming of Jesus. A prophecy, in their view, can be self-fulfilling: it is, however, their Christian duty to expedite it.[17]

For the Christian Zionists, every rocket that flies into Israel and every bridge that is blown up in Lebanon just brings them one step closer to the end of the world. They consider it unchristian to think only of the innocent Arabs and Israelis instead of the Rapture. Instead of seeing the silver lining in every storm cloud, to Christian Zionists the storm clouds in the Middle East are the silver linings. It is, thus not surprising, to see the U.S. vetoing ceasefire resolution at the Security Council

With the aforementioned background, the fear of the region heading to a greater war is fast turning into reality. Imagine the aftermath of bombing Syria and Iran. Surrounded and squeezed by the United States and its Allies on all sides, frustrated Arab populations would turn on their aging, sell-out rulers in Jordan, Egypt, Yemen, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere. Oppressive regimes in the Muslim world would succumb to public demand, and the United States would expands its bloody occupation to other Arab states under the same pretext of fighting “Islamists” and preventing them from erecting an “Islamic empire.”

In the phase two of Zionist totalitarian design, extermination of Arabs in large numbers will take place. Peace would break out with the leftover terrorized and pacified Arabs, and trade would blossom, with Israel occupying almost all of the Middle East and its tourists spending millions in Baghdad, Damascus, Tehran, and Beirut.

Sounds absurd? No more so, perhaps, after all this talk of the impending world war. There are three well-known and basic causes that have made unprecedented bloodshed in the Middle East inevitable. 1: The incompetent United Nations. 2. The helplessness of the whole world before the Israeli terrorism under the auspices of the U.S. 3. Muslims’ inability to change their status from divided sitting ducks to a united bloc for defending their rights or, at least, making an effective demand for real independence, justice, and equality.

Furthermore, Israel requested the United States numerous times to attack Syria and Iran.[18] “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”[19]—co-authored by Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser—portrayed Syria as the main enemy of Israel, but maintained that the road to Damascus had first to pass through Baghdad. That part of the plan has already been completed. The initial report of U.S.-Israeli plans for aggression in 2003[20] have already turned to reports about possible nuclear attacks on Iran in 2006.[21]

Keeping these realities in mind, it is hardly logical to deny—unless these trends and initiatives are effectively reversed—that an escalation of conflict and unprecedented bloodshed is imminent, and realization of the dream of a Greater Israel—however ephemeral and tyrannical—is now set to take place within a matter of years, not decades.

Jamie. I don’t mean to be a Monday morning quarterback. I think you did a wonderful job talking about the Irish having a right to their island. No doubt much better than I could have ever done. There is however one thing I wish you would have said to the host. You should have asked him point blank

“Do you think it is a good thing that the Irish will be a minority in 50 years?”

I think that one question could have changed to whole course of the show and put him on the defensive.

I know it is easy for me to think of things like that sitting in my home listing on the computer. I am sure it is different when you are on the spot.

Re: Stormfront Radio & Town Hall July 19 - with Paul Fromm at Midnight

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roger Brown

Simple. Stop voting for the idiot. I'm tired of seeing these criminals being elected to two terms. It doesn't make any sense to me why the public lets this happen.

Give everybody around you a reason to do the same. Educate them.

That sounds like a good start to me.

Between the two major parties foisting candidates that will
support the same agenda, and black box voting in which votes
can be changed by a phone call, we're up against a pretty tough
nut to crack if we think we're going to change things by voting.

Re: Stormfront Radio & Town Hall July 19 - with Paul Fromm at Midnight

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messiah

Between the two major parties foisting candidates that will
support the same agenda, and black box voting in which votes
can be changed by a phone call, we're up against a pretty tough
nut to crack if we think we're going to change things by voting.

I'm disillusioned to say.....

Good point. So how do we hold our politicians accountable? Expose there crimes to the media?

Don't get me wrong. I know that we aren't going to vote our way out of this. I also know that doing nothing isn't the answer either.

Re: Stormfront Radio & Town Hall July 20 - with Paul Fromm at Midnight

I Hear Bob Whitaker's Footsteps....

Note: This post originally appeared in a thread about our amazing numbers that went whiney. I'm copying it here...as an all-purpose answer that I can reference every time the "sob-sisters of negativity" (but most of them are guys!) emerge.

Boy, some folks just refuse to be happy! About anything. Even the best of news.

Someone wonders how I can have any information about what "inactive" users are thinking, since they don't post. Well, one way is by meeting them in person. I do that. All the time. At conferences all over the U.S. Another way is by picking up the Stormfront phone when they call (561 351-4424). They do that all the time. That's primarily whence the 720 membership referrals for CAL came during just the last two years.

Stormfront adds 1,000 new Members every 12 days or so. The 88,000 people who have registered as Members on Stormfront over the last five years are our total. Nobody ever said that all 88,000 of the folks who each went to the trouble of thinking up a screen name, a password, providing an e-mail address, a birthday, and agreeing to the Terms of Service of Stormfront was a fired-up, enthusiastic White racial activist. I'm sure we've got some sourpusses in there somewhere. They're brothers and sisters too.

The tiny number of non-Whites, such as Jews, Mestizos, Asians and Blacks, who come and go on Stormfront can be viewed as having been useful debate practice for the enthusiastic White folks who comprise such a huge percentage of our Membership that it's silly and sophomoric to argue over whether the non-White presence is 1% or 2% or 1/2 of 1% or perhaps the square root of Pi. Anyone who feels that they might get cooties from the flailing little band of non-Whites vainly trying to beat our White warriors in verbal combat on Stormfront can wrap some Saran-Wrap over their monitor screen.

As for anti-racial White folks who stumble into Stormfront thinking that they're going to convert us....well, we all know what a big surprise they get here. And how happy we are each time one of these kinsmen comes to his or her senses after having made the fortunate mistake of spending too much time with their racially-awake brothers and sisters in Stormfront.

Somebody didn't read my statement that 90% of our readers are frequently Guests very carefully. I didn't make the silly statement that 90% of our Guests are inactive Members. (By the way, don't you like the thinking of those Members who realize that the first impression we Stormfronters make on our Guests is way more important than the impression we make on each other? Guess how many first impressions you get in ANY endeavor!)

In conclusion, we'll get to hear all of this again, when Stormfront hits 89,000 Members, in about 10 days. Stormfront Moderator, White-wing author, comrade of Sam Francis and Joe Sobran, professor, FAA negotiator, and Reagan subcabinet official Bob Whitaker, whose expertise is how to win in politics frequently likes to come into whiney threads like this one to castigate what he calls the "sob sisters of negativity". I think I hear Bob's footsteps now.

Re: Stormfront Radio & Town Hall July 19 - with Paul Fromm at Midnight

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roger Brown

Threats to a Free Internet
Jews pushing Senate to give them control of the world wide web

by Rev. Ted Pike
and V-News staff

The internet is an unprecedented means to leap over established media walls and to speak or receive the whole truth. No longer must Americans depend upon the popular press or the “Big Three” TV evening news programs. Much freer, unbiased news is now available on the web. This alternative is deeply troubling to those who want to control what we hear and think.

In this article, I will briefly discuss two enormous challenges to freedom on the internet. The first is the threat of "anti-hate" laws. In many countries, such as Canada, hate laws criminalize "cyber hate," which includes internet criticism of taboo subjects, particularly non-White races, racial mixing, homosexuality, and matters Jewish. The second is the threat from telephone and cable giants. They want to commercialize the internet, giving preferential service to those they favor, while discriminating against those they don’t.

Anti-"hate" laws are the most direct, effective way to destroy a free internet. Sec. 13.1 of Canada’s federal hate law, the Canadian Human Rights Act, forbids any statement on the internet which holds up members of federally protected groups to "hatred" or contempt. As a result, since its inception 28 years ago, many who have criticized homosexuality or Jews or have questioned the accuracy of the six million figure of alleged Jewish Holocaust victims have been prosecuted, fined thousands of dollars, and threatened with prison if they continue such internet "cyber hate." Paul Fromm, authority on Canada’s internet hate laws, summarizes: “In 28 years, no victim has ever been acquitted of a 13.1 charge-‘hate’ on the internet or on telephone answering machines. No one! Also, all of the victims have been on the right of the political spectrum. It’s Soviet-style political censorship.”

Under the United States' ADL-inspired Hate Crimes Statistics Act of 1990, the ADL obtained the right to teach all FBI, Justice Department, and local police its skewed definition of what "hate" is. ADL’s working definition of "hate" is simple: It means to be biased against a federally protected group, especially Jews, non-Whites, and homosexuals.

ADL wants America to come under the control of a federal anti-hate law like the one it persuaded Parliament to establish in Canada in 1971. Today, as a result of ADL’s Canadian Human Rights Act, criticism of non-Whites, homosexuality or Judaism, whether in publishing, on talk radio, or from the pulpit, is now punishable by huge fines and years of imprisonment. In America, ADL is lobbying Congress for passage of its Orwellian federal anti-hate bill, "The Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act" (LLEEA). LLEEA purports to only give the federal government power to put down violent hate crimes in the states. Actually, it destroys states rights and law enforcement, setting up a bias-motivation justice system like Canada’s.

Under Canada’s hate crimes tribunal system, evidence of bias against members of federally protected groups, plus plaintiffs' claims of being "traumatized" by such criticism, defines whether a hate crime has occurred. Truth is not accepted in this skewed justice system. Because such criteria are highly subjective, hate crimes cases are notoriously drawn out through trial and appeal, financially and emotionally exhausting dissidents and free speech advocates.

For the past five years, ADL/B’nai B’rith has been establishing a 55-nation European "hate crimes" bureaucracy, called the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). OSCE contains a special department dedicated to ending internet free speech. The International Network against Cyber Hate (INACH) is a think-tank of political, legal, communications and internet experts dedicated to finding ways to ban Internet criticism of Israel or matters Jewish.

1) Work to establish hate laws worldwide. ADL's ultimate intention is to create a global network, bringing everyone under international hate laws jurisdiction. To facilitate this, ADL persuaded Congress two years ago to establish an "Office of Global Anti-Semitism" in the U.S. State Department. Fourteen twisted criteria of anti-Semitism coming from a recent state department ADL report make critics of Israel into anti-Semites. ADL's next goal: Make such "anti-Semitic hate criminals" into "domestic terrorists," culpable under Homeland Security.

2) Punish satellite providers and nations which allow "cyber hate" into their countries.

The second major threat to a free internet comes from the huge telephone and cable monopolies, such as Verizon, Comcast, AT&T, and Bell South, whose phone and cable lines make the internet possible. Such phone giants are now committed to massive financial investment in order to combine all phone, internet, e-mail, and video transmission into unified ‘broadband’ communication ‘pipes’. These communication companies protest that Google, Yahoo, etc., as well as billions of internet users should no longer be allowed a relatively ‘free ride.’ Verizon and Comcast are spending millions lobbying Congress to deregulate the internet, allowing the phone and cable monopolies to commercialize and run it as a business. They desire ever-widening power to control not only the internet but all telecommunications.

If such consolidation happens, who will control the internet? Do we have clues concerning how such monopolies will respond to unpopular or politically incorrect ideas? Let’s consider two big giants of the telephone and cable industries: Verizon and Comcast.

Verizon is the largest American wireless phone company. Its CEO is Ivan Seidenburg, Jewish. Seidenburg's internet bio claims he "champions diversity both within and outside” Verizon. What kind of ‘diversity’ is Seidenburg advocating? He serves on the board of directors of Viacom, the world’s largest communication empire, which also promotes a new cable network called "Gay TV."

In 2003, Seidenburg was feted at a fundraiser dinner for the UJA-Federation, helping raise 1.2 million dollars for this Jewish charity. He was given the Stephen J. Ross Award in honor of the deceased Jewish owner of Warner Bros. Communications. Warner Music, a division of Ross's company, is now corrupting the minds and morals of tens of millions of young people worldwide with ‘gangsta’ rap music. Gangsta rap utterly degrades women, encouraging teenage boys to rape "bitches." Filled with unspeakable profanity, it also encourages violence against Whites and even murder of police.

Among the ‘good old boys’ of the Jewish mega media attending this benefit was Edgar Bronfman, Jr., heir of the Seagram’s Liquor Empire. Bronfman owns Interscope Records, the largest producer of ‘gangsta’ rap in the world today. Howard Stringer, Jewish CEO of Sony of America, was also in attendance with Seidenburg. Another conspicuous guest at the UJA dinner was Sumner Redstone (Murray Rothstein), Jewish head of the largest communications giant in the world, Viacom. A cable TV giant, Viacom owns MTV, pumping rock and rap music into 210,000,000 homes. MTV’s blatant degeneracy is the dominant influence on youth between 12 and 24 in the world today, encouraging race-mixing, homosexuality, and contempt for authority and social institutions.

Another Jewish communication monopoly lobbying for internet control is Comcast, the largest cable TV network in America. Twice the size of AOL/Time Warner, Comcast was founded by Jewish Ralph Roberts with his son Brian, now CEO. The "respect for diversity" of both Robertses has deeply pleased Jewry. Ralph Roberts was honored by the ADL with its perversely misnamed "Americanism Award." The Simon Wiesenthal Center, also a powerful advocate of censorship, awarded him their Lifetime Achievement Award. Son Brian received the Humanitarian Award from the Wiesenthal Center Museum of Tolerance, for his "great integrity" for being "intolerant of intolerance." Jeffrey Katzenburg of DreamWorks, presiding at the Wiesenthal Awards ceremony presented a silver menorah to Brian Roberts, saying, “I don’t know anyone who is more connected to his [Jewish] heritage.”

Do the owners of Verizon and Comcast sound like trustworthy custodians of the internet? Both the ADL and the Wiesenthal Center are bastions of Jewish supremacism. For Ralph and Brian Roberts to receive accolades from them means Comcast has satisfied Jewish criteria of "tolerance" - meaning tolerance of everything destructive of White society and intolerance of anyone who complains about it.

Clearly, the Jewish leaders of Verizon and Comcast circulate within the highest levels of evil Jewish media leadership. While the same cannot be proven about the leaders of AT&T or Bell South, it is virtually certain that Verizon and Comcast, if granted control of the internet, will assist the ADL in its desire to end "cyber hate" worldwide.
If a free internet is to be preserved, it is vital that all who love free speech protest to the U.S. Senate. The House of Representatives, buckling under phone and cable pressure, recently passed legislation (HR 5252) appeasing the big phone and cable companies. The Senate will also succumb unless lovers of free speech bombard all members of the Senate with protests.

The U.S. Senate can be contacted toll-free at 888-355-3588 or 866-340-9281. You can give senators this simple message: "Please do not allow the internet to be commercialized by the phone and cable companies. Keep the net neutral."

I don't expect very many people to have the patience and/or the time to do what I just did. I do hope that the majority of you will at least contact your local Senators though.

I know that a lot of people here think that its a waste of time and it might be. But if your Senators don't know what you want, the only voice they hear is from the lobby groups. You would only have your self to blame.

If the public makes there voice heard and your various government representatives ignore that voice, then you have a right to complain.

If nothing else, at least your opening up a dialog. I can tell you from experience that the majority of them will write you back, especially if your from the same state. Not every politician is in the sack with the enemy and you might find a new recruit in time, though they won't be able to admit it.

This is a very important issue and we need to do everything in our power to stop this.

Reading over my words it kind of sounds like an attack. I don't mean it that way at all.

Israel’s policies against Palestinians have prompted worldwide calls for a boycott of the Jewish state, its products, and all companies and organizations that provide it with the ability to continue its agression.

Recently the Jewish state stepped up its offensive against the Palestinian people as well as the Lebanese population, killing scores of innocent civilians and inflicting severe damage on both countries’ infrastructure.

Supporters of a Boycott Israel campaign say Starbucks, the Jewish-owned coffee giant with 4,709 locations worldwide, is helping to make it happen.

The Seattle-based company is known for its pro-Israel stance. Starbucks chair Howard Schultz is an active Zionist whose own activities include running propaganda seminars on behalf of Israel on college campuses in both North America and Israel.

In 1998 Schultz was honored by the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah with "The Israel 50th Anniversary Friend of Zion Tribute Award" for his great support to the Jewish state by "playing a key role in promoting close alliance between the United States and Israel".

The Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah is known for funding Israeli arms fairs chaired by the Israeli transportation Minister and former Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz.

Schultz had also been praised by the Israeli Foreign Ministry as being key to Israel's long-term PR success.

While the Israeli army was committing war crimes against Palestinians in Jenin, Nablus and Bethlehem, Schultz explicitly accused the Palestinians of supporting “terrorism”, and claimed that their Intifada, or uprising, was a manifestation of anti-Semitism.

Starbucks helped Israel's floundering economy and invested in Israel in a joint venture with the Israeli Delek Group for six Starbucks outlets in Israel.

But the company took heavy losses, and in April 2003 announced that it had ended its parntership with Delek and all six of its cafes in Israel would be closed.

However, numerous sources have revealed that Starbucks continues its support of Israel by sponsoring fundraisers for the Jewish state.

The company is also known for its strong support for President Bush's so-called "war on terror." Starbucks has donated a store to U.S. occupation forces in Afghanistan.