Canadian Breast Chemo Regimen May Be Superior to AC/T

Canadian Breast Chemo Regimen May Be Superior to AC/T

• SAN ANTONIO The standard treatment for early breast cancerAC/T was not as effective as two regimens used in Canada in preventing recurrences. Specifically, CEF and a novel regimen, dose-dense EC/T, were both more effective than AC/T in the MA.21 study, reported by Margot Burnell, MD, at the 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (abstract 53). "This clinical trial may change the way many patients with breast cancer are treated in the future," said Dr. Burnell, an oncologist from Saint John, New Brunswick.

The MA.21 study was funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and coordinated by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group. The aim was to incorporate a taxane into an epirubicin (Ellence)-containing regimen and to compare this to existing standard regimens. The trial involved 2,105 women in Canada and the United States, all under the age of 60 and either premenopausal or early postmenopausal, with lymph-node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer. After surgery, the women were randomized to one of three 6-month regimens:

• AC/T: Four cycles of Adriamycin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

• CEF: Six cycles of cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m2 on days 1 to 14, plus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 on days 1 to 8, with antibiotics.

An interim analysis showed the 3-year recurrence-free survival rates to be 85% with AC/T, compared with 90.1% for CEF and 89.5% for dose-dense EC/T. Recurrences were experienced by 112 patients on AC/T, 79 patients on CEF, and 70 patients on EC/T. There was no significant difference between the two epirubicin-containing arms, but the differences between these arms and AC/T was significant (see Table).