Comparison of Youth Released From a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Center to Youth at a Traditional Juvenile Correctional Center in Virginia, 1998-2000 (ICPSR 3538)

This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the
structured substance abuse treatment program at Barrett Juvenile
Correction Center in Virginia by comparing the outcomes of youth
admitted to Barrett with the outcomes of youth who were eligible for
admittance to Barrett but were detained at one of the traditional
juvenile correctional centers in Virginia. The effectiveness of
Barrett's program was also assessed by comparing the outcomes of youth
who were admitted to Barrett but who differed according to how many of
the four ph... (more info)

This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the
structured substance abuse treatment program at Barrett Juvenile
Correction Center in Virginia by comparing the outcomes of youth
admitted to Barrett with the outcomes of youth who were eligible for
admittance to Barrett but were detained at one of the traditional
juvenile correctional centers in Virginia. The effectiveness of
Barrett's program was also assessed by comparing the outcomes of youth
who were admitted to Barrett but who differed according to how many of
the four phases of treatment, focused on modifying negative attitudes
and behaviors, they completed. Barrett differs from the six other
juvenile correctional centers in Virginia in that it provides a highly
structured substance abuse treatment program to all admitted
youth. Youth are considered for admission to Barrett if they are male,
aged 11 to 18, have a sentence of six to 18 months, and have a
recommended or mandatory need for substance abuse treatment as
determined by the Reception and Diagnostic Center (RDC), which
assesses youths' needs prior to sentencing. Barrett's treatment
program takes a therapeutic community approach, which emphasizes
altering negative attitudes and behaviors through the completion of
four sequential phases of treatment. In contrast, the goal of the
traditional institutions was to achieve public safety while meeting
the disciplinary, medical, recreational, and treatment needs of the
youth. These facilities offered some treatment programs but only on an
"as needed" basis. The sample for this study consists of all 412 youth
released from Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center from July 1, 1998,
to June 30, 2000, and a matched sample of 406 youth released from
other juvenile correctional centers in Virginia during the same
period. The treatment staff at Barrett submitted information on
youths' treatment progress at the time of discharge. The RDC provided
demographic, criminal history, and assessment information for all
youths. The Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice provided
information concerning actual time served and recidivism at the
juvenile level. The Virginia State Police supplied additional
recidivism data, including information on adult recidivism. Parole
officers also provided data on recidivism and on progress toward
meeting the conditions of parole. Demographic variables included in
the dataset are race of the offender and his age at
commitment. Clinical variables for Barrett youth only are Substance
Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI) and Intelligence Quotient
(IQ) scores, total number of categories for which the youth scored yes
on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth
edition (DSM-IV), the length of the sentence, whether the youth had a
recommended or mandatory need for substance abuse treatment, and the
highest phase of treatment completed. Parole officers supplied data at
three, six, and 12 months after release on whether they judged youths
to be currently using a substance and whether youths were meeting the
conditions of parole. These conditions included curfew, counseling
services, educational programs, the employment requirement, and the
electronic monitoring requirement. Also included are arrests and
substance-related charges as reported by the Virginia Department of
Juvenile Justice, the Virginia State Police, and parole officers. A
variable for total reconvictions is included as well.

Access Notes

The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public.
Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

The user guide and codebook are provided by ICPSR as a
Portable Document Format (PDF) files. The PDF file format was
developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF
reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how
to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided on the ICPSR Web
site.

Methodology

Study Purpose:
Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center differs from
the six other juvenile correctional centers in Virginia in that it
provides a highly structured substance abuse treatment program to all
admitted youth. Youth are considered for admission to Barrett if they
are male, aged 11 to 18, have a sentence of six to 18 months, and have
a recommended or mandatory need for substance abuse treatment as
determined by the Reception and Diagnostic Center (RDC), which
assesses youths' needs prior to sentencing. Barrett's treatment
program takes a therapeutic community approach, which emphasizes
altering negative attitudes and behaviors through the completion of
four sequential phases of treatment. In contrast, the goal of the
traditional institutions was to achieve public safety while meeting
the disciplinary, medical, recreational, and treatment needs of the
youth. These facilities offered treatment in the areas of substance
abuse, sex offender education, individual and group therapy, skills
counseling, and educational and vocational training to the youth.
However, services were provided on an "as needed" basis. This study
sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment program at
Barrett by comparing the outcomes of youth admitted to Barrett with
the outcomes of youth who were eligible for admittance to Barrett but
were detained at one of the traditional juvenile correctional centers
in Virginia. The effectiveness of Barrett's program was also assessed
by comparing the outcomes of youth who were admitted to Barrett but
differed according to how many of the four phases of treatment they
completed.

Study Design:
The sample consists of all 412 youth released from
Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center from July 1, 1998, to June 30,
2000, and a matched sample of 406 youth released from other juvenile
correctional centers in Virginia during the same period. The treatment
staff at Barrett submitted information on each youth's treatment
progress at the time of discharge, which included phase of treatment
completed, scores from the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory
(SASSI), and whether the youth had a mandatory or recommended need for
substance abuse treatment. The researcher also followed up by
examining case files for all youths released. The RDC provided
demographic, criminal history, and assessment information for all
youth, which included SASSI scores, Intelligence Quotient (IQ) test
scores, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
fourth edition (DSM-IV) scores. The Virginia Department of Juvenile
Justice provided information concerning the actual time served and
recidivism at the juvenile level. The Virginia State Police provided
additional recidivism data, including information on adult
recidivism. Each youth's parole officer was sent data collection
instruments three, six, and 12 months after the youth was released
from his institution. A reminder letter was also sent to parole
officers two weeks after the initial mailing of the data collection
instrument. Parole officers provided data on recidivism and assessed
the substance use of the youth and the youth's progress toward meeting
the conditions of parole.

Sample:
Matched comparison sampling.

Data Source:

administrative records, mailback questionnaires

Description of Variables:
Demographic variables included in the dataset are
race of the offender and his age at commitment. Clinical variables for
Barrett youth only are Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory
(SASSI) and Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores, total number of
categories for which the youth scored yes on the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), the
length of the sentence, whether the youth had a recommended or
mandatory need for substance abuse treatment, and the highest phase of
treatment completed. Parole officers supplied data at three, six, and
12 months after release on whether they judged youths to be currently
using a substance and whether youths were meeting the conditions of
parole. These conditions included curfew, counseling services,
educational programs, the employment requirement, and the electronic
monitoring requirement. Also included are arrests and
substance-related charges as reported by the Virginia Department of
Juvenile Justice, the Virginia State Police, and parole officers. A
variable for total reconvictions is included as well.

Version(s)

Original ICPSR Release:2003-01-31

Version History:

2005-11-04 On 2005-03-14 new files were added to one
or more datasets. These files included additional setup files as well
as one or more of the following: SAS program, SAS transport, SPSS portable,
and Stata system files. The metadata record was revised 2005-11-04 to
reflect these additions.

Download Statistics

Located within ICPSR, NACJD is sponsored by the
Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Institute of Justice, and the Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

This website is funded through Inter-agency agreements through the Bureau of
Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of
the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its
components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this website (including, without limitation,
its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided).