Republicans showcase budget differences with Obama

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., second from left, gestures as he speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 12, 2013. He is joined by, from left, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn of Texas, and Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

House Republicans are staking out stark differences with Democrats as they prepare to meet with President Barack Obama for talks over the budget impasse, while Obama is conceding that a political accommodation may be impossible.

On the one hand, many Republicans who long have chided Obama for failing to engage their party on the nation’s biggest problems are applauding his newfound outreach — part of a concerted effort by the president to mend ties with Congress in hopes of reaching a grand compromise on fiscal issues.

On the other hand, neither side is backing down from entrenched positions that have prevented deals in the past — a status quo scenario that Obama acknowledged could preclude any agreement.

“Ultimately, it may be that the differences are just too wide,” he said in an interview broadcast Wednesday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” hours before he was to meet with House Republicans at the Capitol.

“It may be that, ideologically, if their position is, ‘We can’t do any revenue,’ or ‘We can only do revenue if we gut Medicare or gut Social Security or gut Medicaid, if that’s the position, then we’re probably not going to be able to get a deal,” he said.

The issues separating the two parties are the same as they have been all along — fundamental disagreements over whether to pair tax increases with budget cuts in an effort to rein in the nation’s deficit.

Exhibit A: the House GOP’s new budget proposal, crafted by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., who ran against Obama as the 2012 Republican vice presidential nominee but broke bread with him last week as the president initiated his congressional “charm offensive.”

Ryan and House Republicans put forward their 2014 budget fully mindful that it would be dead on arrival at the White House and in the Democratic-controlled Senate. The plan, which the White House immediately panned, doubles down on longstanding Republican proposals to slash funding for programs Obama and Democrats sorely want to protect. It includes a repeal of Obama’s health care law — a major component of his legacy — and Medicare changes that would shift more of the cost to future patients.

“I understand that not everyone shares our view. And I respect that difference of opinion. All I ask is that you join in the effort. If you don’t like our plan, offer your own,” Ryan said Wednesday at a budget committee meeting.

Democrats rejected it out of hand, arguing that November’s election, in which Democrats gained seats and Obama won a second term after campaigning on the need for more revenue, showed Americans had rejected the GOP approach.

“While providing a tax windfall to the very wealthy, this proposal absolutely guts vital investments that are essential to shared prosperity, upward mobility, and rising middle class,” said Democratic Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the budget panel’s top Democrat.

Nor has Obama budged from his insistence that any budget include new tax revenues — the key sticking point in February’s failed attempt to avert $85 billion in automatic spending cuts that both parties agreed made for bad policy.

Meanwhile, Senate Democrats were to unveil a counterproposal Wednesday that aides said would raise taxes by almost $1 trillion and would use savings to repeal the automatic spending cuts — a nonstarter for House Republicans.

The resolve from both sides to dig in their heels on the most contentious issues raises an important question about Obama’s efforts to make nice with Republicans: What’s the point?

The president, who was returning to Capitol Hill Wednesday for more discussions, said in the network interview that he was searching for the “common-sense caucus.”

Earlier, White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters, “We’re not naive. There are disagreements and obstacles. But the president is at the head of this effort because he believes deeply in it.”

In reaching out to lawmakers, Obama hopes to attract more moderate elements from both parties in Congress to deal comprehensively with the nation’s long-term fiscal imbalance. The fence-mending campaign started with a dinner Obama hosted last week at a hotel near the White House for a dozen Senate Republicans and continues this week with the House GOP meeting Wednesday and a pair of closed-door sessions with House Democrats and Senate Republicans on Thursday.

In interviews and on Sunday talk shows, many Republicans on the receiving end of Obama’s overtures have praised the president for making an effort — even if they feel it’s too little, too late.

“We welcome it,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Tuesday. “I told the president on Friday I hope he’ll invite all of our members down for these dinners.”

But other Republicans are refusing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt.

Fueling their reluctance is the not-so-distant memory of being hammered by the president on a near-daily basis amid last month’s fight over the automatic spending cuts; Obama claimed Republicans alone were responsible for blocking a deal.

“All of a sudden there’s a pivot literally overnight, where he wants to come to the caucus and everyone should get out the drums and pound them and sing songs,” Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., who chairs the House GOP’s campaign committee, said in an interview. “It doesn’t work like that in any relationship I’ve been in.”

White House aides say Obama is also sensitive to the fact that for Republicans looking ahead to the 2014 elections, appearing too chummy with a Democratic president could inflict more harm than good — especially for Republicans from conservative states who fear a primary challenge from their right.

A House leadership aide said that Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, believes Obama’s outreach is genuine but that GOP leaders perceive it to be geared mostly toward boosting Obama’s own standing. The aide was not authorized to discuss publicly internal GOP deliberations and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The White House argues it’s the opposite. Freed from the need to run for re-election, aides said, Obama feels more flexibility to strike deals with Republicans that include provisions that liberals in his own party might not want, such as an adjustment for Social Security cost-of-living increases. Obama proposed the idea Tuesday in a meeting with Senate Democrats, but it’s not included in the plan Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash., was to unveil Wednesday.

Murray’s proposal would raise taxes by almost $1 trillion over a decade and cut spending by almost $1 trillion over the same period. But more than half of the combined deficit savings would be used to repeal the spending cuts that began to hit the economy on March 1 and are set to continue through the decade.

The president will release his own budget proposal in early April, although aides are playing down its significance because prospects that Congress will take up his plan are negligible.

1 COMMENT

Republicans are smart enough to realize that generations of heads of the household are no longer responsible for the welfare of the family. Our schools gave up quality for entertainment. The kids don’t realize how lacking they are in communications because they do just fine among themselves. We are working on a third generation of Americans who lack the ability to realize what they are missing. Books are a thing of the past.

We need the immigrants to train for the new jobs. We also need some well-trained fathers to pass on their skills to their kids. Academics must be introduced at home because the core of public schools focus on the lower students. The missing link here is “equal standards”

Charter schools might be the answer but people are going to have to put up the funds because the GOP will never work for the the more poorly educated of our kids. It is easier to lower the standards than to raise the tide of academics.

The Republican House despises the President and will never back a plan or even a suggestion in any level of improvement. The parents will never stand up for a change and would rather issue a label and blame the government.

Comments are closed.

Our Privacy Policy

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site.

These companies may use aggregated information (not including your name, address, email address or telephone number) about your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you.