An apparatus and process for applying a synthetic lenticule to the cornea of a human eye is disclosed, the process also contemplating selective reprofiling of the lenticule while it is in place over the cornea. The process involves securing the lenticule over the cornea with an adhesive, thus leaving the visual axis of the eye undisturbed or with the peripheral edge thereof being retained by a peripheral slit. A laser delivery system is used to reprofile the lenticule if necessary for refining the refractive power of the lenticule.

Claim:

We claim:

1. A process for application of a synthetic lenticule over the cornea of a human eye for correcting vision, said lenticule having the inherent capability to be profiled with a laser,said process comprising the steps of:

a) removing the outer epithelial layer from the anterior surface of the cornea;

c) cross-linking the said material to form said material into a lenticule; and

d) profiling the lenticule thus formed with a laser to the extent necessary to effect correction of the patient's vision.

2. A process for application of a synthetic lenticule over the cornea of a human eye for correcting vision, said lenticule having the capability to be profiled with a laser, said process comprising the steps of:

a) removing the epithelial layer from the anterior surface of the cornea;

c) forming said synthetic material into a lenticular shape with a molding device; and

d) cross-linking of said material.

3. A process as defined in claim 2 and including the additional step of:

profiling said lenticule with a laser to adjust the refractive power thereof.

4. A process as defined in claim 2 and including the additional step of:

profiling said lenticule with a laser to the extent necessary to effect correction of the patient's vision.

5. A process as defined in claim 2 in which said synthetic material is resistant to invasion by cells and cellular agents.

6. A process for application of a synthetic lenticule over the cornea of a human eye for correcting vision, said process comprising the steps of:

a) removing the epithelial layer from the anterior surface of the cornea;

b) applying a viscous synthetic material over the exposed corneal surface layer; and

c) causing said viscous material to be formed into a lenticule.

Description:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Thirty to forty percent of the human population develop an ocular refractive error requiring correction by glasses, contact lens, or surgical means. Refractive errors result when the optical elements of the eye, the cornea and the lens, fail toimage light directly on the retina. If the image is focused in front of the retina, myopia (nearsightedness) exists. An eye which focuses images behind the retina is said to be hyperopic (farsighted). An eye which has power that varies significantlyin different meridians is said to be astigmatic. The focusing power of the eye is measured in units called diopters. The cornea is responsible for about two-thirds of the eye's 60 diopter refracting power. The crystalline lens contributes theremainder.

The search to find a permanent cure for refractive errors, including myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism has gone on for many years. An effective, safe, predictable, and stable correction for these ametropias would have enormous social andeconomic impact.

Ophthalmologists have derived a number of surgical procedures which attempt to correct refractive errors. None of these techniques have gained widespread acceptance because the procedures generally have unpredictable outcomes and undesirableside effects such as glare, fluctuating vision, and corneal scarring. Unpredictable refractive outcome is the primary reason radial keratotomy has not been accepted by a majority of ophthalmologists as an effective treatment for myopia. Two otherrecent techniques to correct ametropias are briefly described below.

Epikeratophakia (meaning lens on top of the cornea) is a technique in which a portion of a donor cornea is used to make a lens which is sewn or glued to the surface of the patient's cornea in an attempt to correct his refractive error. Thisprocedure involves freezing the donor corneal tissue and grinding the posterior surface to achieve the desired optical configuration. This donor lenticule is then usually sewn into a groove in the patient's cornea cut by a circular mechanical trephinewith hand dissection of a circular pocket. Epikeratophakia is used primarily in patients who have had cataract operations and in whom an intraocular lens is contraindicated, such as children or older patients with certain eye diseases, and has also beenused to correct for myopia.

There are several problems with epikeratophakia which render its routine use for patients with refractive errors unsatisfactory. The procedure is highly unpredictable and errors in refraction exceeding thirty percent of the expected change arecommon. Decrease in the patient's best corrected visual acuity is also encountered following epikeratophakia. The refractive change achieved by epikeratophakia is not adjustable, and patients who are grossly over or under corrected must have thelenticule removed and replaced.

A second technique to correct refractive errors, termed photorefractive keratectomy, has recently been developed. Energy generated by a pulsed argon fluoride excimer laser at a wavelength of 193 nm causes a precise removal of corneal tissuewithout adjacent thermal or mechanical damage. Several optical laser delivery systems have been described which attempt to achieve a controlled etching of the anterior cornea to the desired refractive curvature. Unfortunately, three major shortcomingsrender this technique clinically unacceptable for some patients: scarring, unpredictable outcome, and refractive instability.

Since this procedure is performed directly in the visual axis, any scarring is unacceptable. Several investigators have demonstrated relatively dense opacification of the cornea in animals and humans following photorefractive keratectomy withthe 193 nm excimer laser. Although the scarring may be reduced by improvements in the optics of the delivery systems, there will remain very significant risks associated with irreversible treatment of the central optical axis of the eye.

A second problem with photorefractive keratectomy is the unpredictable refractive outcome of the technique. The final curvature of the ablated cornea will be influenced by stress and strain distribution changes occurring following ablation. Since the eye is a pressurized sphere, removal of some of its anterior surface causes the remaining tissue to accept a higher load of wall tension caused by the intraocular pressure. The net affect of this redistribution will cause the ablated cornea toshift in an anterior direction following photorefractive keratectomy, inducing a steepening of the optical zone. The extent of this shift will vary with the intraocular pressure, the patient's age, and tissue characteristics and therefore can causesignificant variations in optical outcome.

Another serious problem with directly reprofiling the central area of the anterior corneal surface is the inability of the procedure to achieve a stable outcome. The majority of the thickness of the cornea is termed the stroma and consists ofwater, collagen fibers, a matrix substance, and numerous cells called keratocytes. The keratocytes, which reside between Bowman's layer and Descemet's membrane, help produce and maintain the collagen structure of the corneal stroma. These cells arealso responsible for wound healing following corneal injury. When Bowman's layer is violated, these cells produce new collagen as scar tissue and attempt to reform the injured or disrupted fibers. The cornea heals in a very slow fashion with thekeratocytes laying down and remodeling new collagen over many months to years.

During photorefractive keratectomy, a certain depth of the anterior cornea is ablated, depending on the refractive change desired. The more refractive change needed, the deeper the required ablation. Despite the fact that the collagenoussurface re-epithelializes normally after laser ablation, the keratocytes begin to produce new collagen in an attempt to restore the thinned stroma. This regeneration of new collagen (which is highly variable) in the anterior stroma will cause thecorneal curvature to continually change as new collagen is added.

In addition to stromal collagen regeneration, investigators have noted a compensatory thickening of the epithelium following photoablative keratectomy. This hyperplastic epithelium, which may result from wound healing mediators, will vary in itsthickness over time and contribute to the instability of the refractive outcome. Since the processes of stromal collagen regeneration and epithelial hyperplasia occur over a long period of time, the refractive power of the eye will be constantlyfluctuating for many months or years following the procedure, and these wound healing processes will undermine the overall predictability of the procedure.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is, therefore, one of the principal objects of the present invention to provide an apparatus and process for application of a synthetic lenticule for effecting corrections in visual acuity, obviating the need for glasses and/or contact lenses,the process including steps for safely and easily reprofiling the lenticule after application without its removal should future refractive adjustments be necessary.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for application of a synthetic lenticule which does not require ablation of the central corneal region or Bowman's layer, thereby avoiding irreversible disturbance of the visual axisof the patient.

A further object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and a process in which the synthetic lenticule can be safely and easily removed and replaced with a different synthetic lenticule if necessitated by the physical condition ofthe patient or by other factors.

A still further object of the present invention is to provide a process which corrects refractive errors in patients and which avoids the previously mentioned problems associated with current techniques and procedures.

These and additional objects are attained by the present invention which relates to an apparatus and a process for application and reprofiling, if necessary, a synthetic lenticule for vision correction. The process first involves the removal ofthe overlying epithelium. A synthetic lenticule, which has been formed or selected to correct the particular refractive error in the patient's vision, is then secured over the undisturbed central corneal region utilizing the present apparatus. Theapplication of the lenticule may be carried out under vacuum conditions and certain pharmacological agents may then be applied to the surface of the lenticule to enhance the regrowth of the normal epithelial cells over the lenticule. A further stepincludes selective reprofiling of the lenticule by laser ablation for refining the refractive power of the lenticule, if necessary.

The process thus provides a safe and effective means for correcting refractive errors without the central surgical invasion of the cornea attendant in certain prior art techniques. Adjustment or fine tuning of the visual correction imparted isquickly and easily performed in a matter of minutes if needed after application of the lenticule.

Various additional objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description, with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a partial, side elevational and cross-sectional view of the outer half of a normal human eye.

FIG. 2 is an enlarged; partial cross-sectional view of the outer half of the eye, shown prior to the operation embodying the present process;

FIG. 3 is an enlarged, partial cross-sectional view, similar to the preceding figure, with the epithelium removed, exposing the anterior surface layer of the cornea;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged, partial cross-sectional view, similar to the preceding figure, shown with an outer peripheral groove formed in the cornea;

FIG. 5 is a diagrammatical view of a laser apparatus suitable for ablating the peripheral groove or slit and for reprofiling the lenticule.

FIG. 6 is a partial top plan view of the eye, corresponding to the view shown in FIG. 4;

FIG. 7 is an enlarged, partial, cross-sectional view showing a sealant means disposed in the groove for receiving the edge of the lenticule, the view being taken on line 6--6 of FIG. 5;

FIG. 8 is a diagrammatical view, shown partially in cross-section, of the apparatus used for placing the lenticule over the cornea;

FIG. 9 is an enlarged, partial, cross-sectional view, similar to FIG. 4, showing the lenticule secured in place over the cornea;

FIG. 10 is an enlarged, partial, cross-sectional view, similar to the preceding figure, schematically illustrating reprofiling of the lenticule;

FIG. 11 is an enlarged, partial cross-sectional view, similar to the preceding figure, showing the reprofiled lenticule in place with the epithelium regrown thereover;

FIG. 12 is an enlarged partial, cross-sectional view illustrating an alternate embodiment of the present invention in which no host bed preparation is done to the cornea;

FIG. 13 is an enlarged, partial, cross-sectional view illustrating another embodiment in which a peripheral slit is formed in the cornea to receive the lenticule; and

FIG. 14 is an enlarged, partial, cross-sectional view illustrating an alternate embodiment of the embodiment shown in the preceding figure;

FIGS. 15A through 15E illustrate an embodiment of a viscous synthetic material applied over the intact cornea and formed into a lenticule; and

FIGS. 16A through 16H illustrate an alternate embodiment for application and shaping of a viscous synthetic material over the intact cornea.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now more specifically to the drawings, and to FIG. 1 in particular, numeral 20 designates generally the outer half of the human eye upon which the present process for vision correction is performed, portions thereof being describedhereinbelow as an aid in understanding the present process. The portions of the cornea 21 of the eye which are involved in the present process include an outer layer of epithelial cells 22 which cover the outer cornea, which is known as Bowman's layer24. The cornea has an inner corneal membrane 26, known as Descement's membrane, which has covering layer 28 on its posterior surface, termed the endothelium. Between the anterior and posterior boundaries are layers of striated tissue, termed the stroma30, which comprise the bulk of the cornea 21.

The optical axis of the eye, one point of which is indicated generally at 32, can be considered as an imaginary line which extends through the central region, including the cornea 21, the lens 34, and the vitreous region 36 to the rear of theeyeball near the optic nerve (shown above). This region of the cornea is the most important region of the cornea with regard to the vision of the patient. This factor, which has been observed in the outcomes of several of the prior art techniquespreviously described, is a major reason why the present process specifically avoids any surgical invasion of the central region of the cornea.

FIG. 2 illustrates in magnified detail the section of the eye shown in FIG. 1, shown prior to beginning the process embodying the present invention. Before any corrective measures are undertaken, a detailed analytical profile of the patient'scornea is normally made and analyzed by the physician. Such a profile may be obtained with a conventional keratoscope or by a corneal topographic mapping system such as, for example, the Corneal Modeling System developed by the Computed Anatomy Corp. of New York, N.Y. Such computer modeling provides the physician with a three dimensional profile of the cornea and precisely defines its anterior shape. Thus, patients with refractive errors would undergo ocular examinations to obtain data used indetermining the lenticule manufacturing or selection criteria. Corneal topographic data may be used to determine the posterior shape of the lenticule, and refractive data is used to determine the anterior shape. The lenticule can then be manufacturedto meet individual patient specifications.

Armed with this data, the physician designs, orders, or selects an appropriate lenticule having the desired refractive characteristics. The lenticule is manufactured from a synthetic or reconstituted polymer, such as a preferred syntheticcollagenous polymer, or other suitable synthetic material that is biocompatible with the tissues of the eye. The lenticule is prepared and treated with appropriate chemical means to achieve the desired properties of constituency, optical clarity, andstability. The material also has characteristics such that it is resistant to invasion and/or degradation by cells and cellular agents. The material can be shaped to the desired specifications by injection molding, lathe cutting, laser profiling, or acombination of these and/or other techniques. Additionally, the material used for the lenticule has the capability to support and maintain epithelial growth in a normal fashion over its anterior surface and has favorable optical characteristics for thetransmission of light in the visible spectrum. A final requirement of the synthetic material is that it will allow laser reprofiling of its anterior surface after attachment to the cornea, which is a significant and unique step disclosed by the presentinventive process. Such materials meeting the above requirement are currently available on the market and other suitable synthetic materials are likely to be developed. It is important to note however, that the present process does not involve orcontemplate the use of donor corneal material from a human eye.

With the detailed profile of the anterior surface of the cornea, that is, Bowman's layer 24, provided by a suitable mapping system, the posterior surface 38 of the lenticule 40 (FIG. 8) is configured such that it precisely matches the patient'santerior corneal curvature after the removal of the epithelium 22. The anterior surface 42 of the lenticule, which serves as the new optical curve for the cornea, is shaped prior to application to the curvature necessary to correct the patient'srefractive error, when using a lenticule that is relatively rigid.

In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, the physician determines in a more general manner the approximate contour of the anterior surface of the cornea to provide an indication of the refractive error to be corrected and to provide ageneral indication of the required thickness of the lenticule to be applied thereover. This type of general determination is made possible since attachment of the lenticule according to the present method avoids any surgical invasion of the cornea inthe visual axis and, as disclosed hereinafter, some attachment techniques avoid any surgical invasion of the cornea whatsoever. The material used for the lenticule in this alternate embodiment has the characteristics defined hereinabove, i.e.,capability of being reprofiled, resistant to invasion by cells and cellular agents, and constructed of a material designed to correct refractive errors. In addition, the material also has sufficient flexibility to conform to the anterior surface of thecornea. This also obviates the need to profile the posterior surface of the lenticule to conform to the anterior surface of the cornea since the material is self-conforming. Attaching this flexible material to the cornea is accomplished with any of thetechniques disclosed herein.

With the synthetic lenticule prepared, reference is made to FIGS. 3 through 14, which illustrate the additional steps of the present invention. The corneal epithelium 22 is normally removed mechanically, as shown in FIG. 3, with a chemicalsolution on a swab or by other suitable means.

FIG. 5 illustrates diagrammatically a combination scanning device for mapping the contour of the eye and laser delivery system 44, a preferred system providing energy generated by a pulsed laser for reprofiling the lenticule after itsapplication. One suitable laser system is an argon fluoride excimer laser, the energy produced having a wavelength of 193 nm. The system is capable of a precisely determined removal of material without thermal or mechanical damage to adjacent regions. Such a system is discussed in L'Esperance, Jr. U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,913 for a Method For Ophthalmological Surgery. Other suitable laser delivery systems may also be used, such as a 2.9 micron infrared laser system, and other systems are underdevelopment.

The patient's eye is fixed at the limbus 46, to the housing 48 of the system, by a limbal suction ring 50, a vacuum within the ring being created by evacuating the air within the ring through ports 51. Taking into consideration the diameter andthe configuration of the peripheral edge 52 of the prepared lenticule 40, the laser delivery system is programmed to etch a shallow peripheral groove 54, extending into or through Bowman's layer 24 and into the stroma 30. A template (not shown) or aspecialized lens, such as an axicon lens (not shown) may be used to direct and focus the microprocessor controlled laser output, forming the groove in a peripheral, optically insignificant region of the cornea. Thus, as shown in FIG. 6, the groove isformed well outside the visual axis of the patient. In addition to a suitable laser delivery system, mechanical cutting means, such as a trephine, may be used to form the groove provided the mechanical means used includes the required precision to formthe groove without damage to adjacent tissue under the control of a skilled surgeon.

With the groove 54 formed, a suitable adhesive means 56 is applied therein to receive and bond the lenticule to the cornea, as shown in FIG. 7. A preferred adhesive is collagen-based glue so as to be biocompatible with the corneal stroma andwith the lenticule. Other suitable securing means may also be used, for example, suturing, with a suitably prepared lenticule, preferably having preformed apertures to receive the sutures, thus preventing asymmetrical tension on the eye or lenticule.

FIG. 8 diagrammatically illustrates a lenticule application apparatus 58, which may be used in some cases. In the alternative, the lenticule can be placed manually by the surgeon. The eye is fixed as shown in FIG. 5, like elements being definedby like numerals, with suction ring 50 securing the apparatus to the limbus 46 of the eye. The apparatus is similar in use to that shown in FIG. 5 as far as attachment to the eye; however, certain features have been added as described hereinbelow. Thelenticule 40 is held by a suction ring 60 having a vacuum line 61, the ring 60 being attached to a micromanipulator system. The vacuum line communicates with the posterior surface of the suction ring so as to selectively create a vacuum between the ringand the lenticule. The micromanipulator has a horizontal carriage 62, a vertical carriage 64, and a 360.degree. gimbal 66, thus being capable of movement in any axis as well as translations across these axes. The unit is powered through electricalpower lines or cables 67 and is driven by a motor 65 which receives signals from a microprocessor 68. The micromanipulator unit is controlled by the surgeon with conventional remote control means (not shown). In this embodiment, after the adhesivemeans 56 is applied in the groove by a suitable applicator (not shown), the main chamber 69 is evacuated of air through suction ports 70. With a sufficient vacuum obtained, the lenticule 40 is lowered into position on the cornea. The surgeon mayutilize fiber optic viewing ports 72 to assist in alignment of the peripheral edge 52 of the lenticule with the groove 54.

Once the lenticule is in position, as shown in FIG. 9, the vacuum in the main chamber is released. Since the mating of the lenticule with the corneal surface occurs under conditions of low pressure, the return of ambient air pressure causes afirm seating of the lenticule to the cornea. This assures good approximation of the posterior surface of the lenticule to the corneal layer during the bonding period of the glue which normally takes several minutes. The glue achieves permanent bondingof the peripheral edge of the lenticule in the groove. The precision etching of the groove by the laser, as dictated by the diameter of the lenticule and the configuration of the peripheral edge 52 thereof, assures that the anterior surface of the edgeportion is substantially flush with the outer, adjacent corneal layer, thus providing no mechanical barrier to the epithelial cell layer which then regrows over the lenticule.

Immediately after attachment of the lenticule, the anterior curvatures can be remeasured to determine if the anticipated correction has been achieved. If there were inaccuracies in the initial circulation of the lenticular shape or changes inlenticule curvature due to the attachment technique, these may be immediately corrected by laser profiling of the lenticule by the laser delivery system.

After placement of the overlay into position on the cornea, certain pharmacological agents may be applied which enhance and speed the growth of epithelial cells over the lenticule, agents such as fibronectin, epidermal growth factor, andantibiotics. With these agents, epithelial covering will normally be complete within several days, this being illustrated in FIG. 11.

After the lenticule is covered with epithelium, it is expected the patient's refractive error will be largely, if not completely, corrected. However, if further refractive adjustments are necessary, a suitable laser delivery system, aspreviously described and shown in FIG. 5, can be used to reprofile the anterior curvature of the lenticule to the desired shape. The data used to determine reprofiling criteria are determined in follow-up examinations and may include the previous dataobtained on the patient, corneal topographic mapping, automated cycloplegic refraction measurements, and any other pertinent data.

Should reprofiling of the lenticule be required at any time after placement of the overlay, the corneal epithelium is removed as previously described, the eye then being as shown in FIG. 9. The laser delivery system shown in FIG. 5 is set up andthe eye is fixed at the limbus 46 as discussed hereinabove. Assuming, for example, that a myopic condition still exists or develops later, the laser is directed to reprofile the surface of the lenticule 40 in the central region thereof, thereby reducingthe curvature, this being schematically illustrated in FIG. 10. To increase the curvature, the laser ablation would be directed to the peripheral regions of the lenticule (not shown), thus steepening the curve and adjusting for hyperopic condition. After reprofiling, the epithelium regrows over the lenticule, as shown in FIG. 11. Thus, the lenticule's design, including its thickness and composition, allows for laser reprofiling of its anterior surface after attachment to the patient's eye. Suchreprofiling allows correction of residual refractive errors. The process thus provides patients with refractive errors an alternative means of correcting their vision without the need for spectacles, contact lenses, or current surgical techniques, andallows for future corrections to be made as needed.

Thus, it is believed apparent to those skilled in the art, the many advantages of the process of applying a synthetic overlay, laser-adjustable, refractive surface over present techniques of refractive surgery including improved safety,predictability, and stability, as well as the option to adjust or remove the overlay.

The safety of the process is evident in that the central optical zone of the patient's cornea is never violated. A shallow peripheral excision is made well outside of the visual axis. In contrast, photorefractive keratectomy involves directlyablating corneal tissue within the optical zone. Any malfunction of the laser delivery system, debris on the cornea, or unintended ocular motion during ablation could result in severe optical effects for the patient.

Compared with current techniques, no significant structural weakening of the cornea occurs with the method described with this invention. Radial keratotomy, on the other hand, significantly weakens the cornea by making multiple, near fullthickness incisions. Photorefractive keratectomy will remove a variable amount of anterior corneal tissue depending on the required refractive change. For example, correcting a 10 diopter refractive error over a six mm optical zone will requireremoving nearly 20% of the corneal thickness, a very significant amount.

Another safety advantage to the synthetic overlay technique is the avoidance of direct irradiation of the optical axis of the eye with far ultraviolet laser energy. Although current evidence suggests the 193 nm excimer laser appears to be safefor corneal surgery, long term hazards such as delayed corneal scarring are minimized by confining laser ablation to a small peripheral region of the cornea which is optically insignificant to the patient.

A significant improvement in predictability of the refractive outcome is provided by the present technique. Since there is no significant structural weakening of the cornea, variables induced by curvature changes of the patient's cornea will notbe encountered after the procedure, the actual result closely approximating, if not matching, the anticipated change.

Once the lenticule covers with epithelium, the refractive result remains stable over time. Since the overlay is composed of a material which prevents invasion or degradation by cells or cellular agents, no refractive shift caused by collagendeposition or removal is encountered as is seen in photorefractive keratectomy.

A further, significantly unique feature of the synthetic overlay process described herein is the ability to adjust the refractive power of the lenticule after it is placed on the cornea. Unlike procedures such as radial keratotomy orepikeratophakia which are not adjustable, the overlay can be reprofiled while in place on the corneal surface if a new refractive power is needed. Although photorefractive keratectomy procedures could be repeated on patients who did not achieve theirdesired correction, each treatment would irreversibly remove more of the patient's central corneal tissue, and risk causing corneal scarring with every treatment.

The techniques described in this invention provide a mechanism to apply and secure a synthetic lenticule to the surface of the eye while avoiding the undesirable mechanical distorting forces associated with present techniques of corneal bedpreparation and suturing.

Referring now to FIG. 12, an alternate embodiment of the present invention, with regard to the application of the lenticule, is illustrated in cross-section. In this embodiment, after the epithelium is removed, the lenticule 140 is applieddirectly over Bowman's layer 24 with no disturbance at all to Bowman's layer or the stroma 30. The peripheral edge 152 of the lenticule is chamfered so as to provide a smooth transition between the lenticule edge and Bowman's layer, thus presenting noobstacle to the regrowth of the epithelial cell layer. The lenticule is secured in place with a suitable biocompatible adhesive means 56, which is applied either beneath the peripheral edge 152, as shown in FIG. 12, or where the adhesive issubstantially completely transparent, beneath the entire lenticule, as shown in FIG. 13 for the succeeding embodiment, or by other suitable means.

This embodiment offers advantages in that no receiving means, i.e. a peripheral groove, etc. is formed in the cornea, thus making the procedure completely reversible. Further advantages are identical to those discussed previously, regarding,among others; the amenability of the lenticule to profiling or reprofiling, using a suitable laser delivery system; the adjustability of the imparted vision correction; and the avoidance of any surgical invasion of the central corneal region, thusobviating the possibility of scarring from keratocyte regeneration or other factors.

FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate another embodiment of the present invention, the application differing only in the use and/or non-use and placement of the securing means, as between the two figures. In each of the illustrated applications, aperipheral slit 180 is formed in an optically insignificant region of the cornea, the slit being formed by any of a number of conventional means, such as a trephine. The chamfered edge 252 of lenticule 240 is inserted into the slit 180 where it isretained by means of the design of the chamfered edge portion and the angle at which the slit 180 is formed without the need for an adhesive or other securing means. The lenticule 240 may also be further secured by the application of an adhesive means56 either beneath the entire lenticule, as shown in FIG. 13, or at the peripheral edge, as shown in FIG. 14.

In either case, lenticule 240 is designed with the same principles in mind as the previously described embodiments, providing the capability of profiling or reprofiling the lenticule with the laser after its application over the cornea, providingfor reversibility of the operation with no disturbance of the central corneal region, and providing a smooth transition between the peripheral edge thereof and Bowman's layer, thus facilitating the regrowth of the epithelial layer. In addition, asdiscussed hereinabove, the lenticule may be relatively rigid or flexible and thus, self-conforming.

A further possible material for the lenticule is a viscous material which could be spread in place over a patient's cornea or simply flow into place. A suitable molding device is placed over the viscous mass to generally form the shape of thelenticule. The viscous lenticule material is then solidified, using, for example, UV cross-linked collagen molding. The cross-linking may also be carried out using light in another region of the spectrum, (visible, infrared), having an appropriatephotoinitiator such as an organic dye or the cross-linking may be effected using chemical means. Once solidified the material is stable and can be profiled, reprofiled and/or removed if necessary or desirable. Similarly, a collagenous adhesive meansmay be used to secure the lenticule in place over the cornea, utilizing a similar system of cross-linking via radiation or chemical means.

These embodiments are illustrated in FIGS. 15A through 15E and 16A through 16H. FIGS. 15A through 15E illustrate one possible molding technique. The mold 200 may be designed with the required corrective profile needed for the lenticule 202 orthe lenticule may be reprofiled after curing as has been discussed hereinabove. Curing of the viscous lenticular material on the cornea 204 may be effected by radiation means or chemical means.

FIGS. 16A through 16H illustrate an embodiment in which the viscous lenticular material 206 is applied to the exposed cornea 204 after removal of a portion of epithelium 205 whereupon it flows into place, bounded by the remaining epithelium. Theflowing action may even be augmented by the polymerization activator, whether it be radiation or chemical means. The cross-linking is completed with radiation means 207 or chemical means. In both of the just-described methods, the edges 209 of thelenticule are tapered so as to provide no physical barrier to the epithelium which re-covers the new lenticule.

FIG. 16G illustrates graphically ablation of the lenticule to provide the necessary or desired vision correction. The laser 210 may be an excimer laser or other suitable reprofiling device. The epithelium 205 then recovers the lenticule asshown in FIG. 16H, regardless of the molding or shaping method, as is described in detail hereinabove.

Finally, the method described herein is reversible. Unlike radial keratotomy or photorefractive keratectomy which are essentially irreversible procedures, the synthetic lenticule may be removed if unforeseen problems develop. Thus, amalfunction in the laser reprofiling delivery system when used as described above may render the synthetic lenticule optically unacceptable, but would leave the patient's central cornea completely intact, and a substitute lenticule can easily be applied. This ease of removal also permits the profiling or reprofiling steps discussed hereinabove to be easily accomplished with the lenticule having been removed from over the cornea. For example, a lenticule having the peripheral edge disposed in a slit withno use of securing means can easily be removed for reprofiling if necessary, the determination of what adjustments are needed being made by the ophthalmologist,

While an embodiment of an apparatus and process for application and adjustable reprofiling of synthetic lenticules for vision correction and modifications thereof have been shown and described in detail herein, various additional modificationsmay be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.