Pages

1/7/2017 Justin ArnA new video has surfaced from the Chilean Navy showing an Unidentified Flying Object over the skies of Chile. The 9 minute video shows what appears to be a hovering bulbous projectile travelling at high altitude. Investigative Journalist Leslie Kean has written an extensive article on the UFO sighting in the Huffington Post. Kean is less skeptical than most leading scientists claim to be and her work in this area could best be described as "thoughtful."

Not the least interesting feature of the video is that it shows the UFO emitting what appears to be a chemtrail or contrail of some sort. From Kean's piece:

"But there is one additional component that makes this footage particularly unique: “In two instances it discharged some type of gas or liquid with a high thermal track or signal,” the technician stated. After filming for about eight minutes, the stunning ejection of a massive plume of a very hot material is captured on the video, trailing behind the object. (The plume blended into the clouds when seen in HD.)"

The video itself can be difficult to watch and Kean recommends doing so on as large a screen as possible.

Has History been Altered?

Thucydides, the Ancient Greek Propagandist told as much. See what others had to say....

The Myth of Scientific Infallibility

Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, puts it like this:

"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness."

"To understand the potential costs of failing to engage at the level of method, consider theInnocence Project’s recent investigation of 268 criminal trials in which evidence from hair analysis had been used to convict defendants. In 257 of those cases, the organization found forensic testimony by FBI scientists to be flawed — a conclusion the FBI does not dispute. What is more, each inaccurate analysis overstated the strength of hair evidence in favor of the prosecution. Thirty-two defendants in those cases were eventually sentenced to death, of whom fourteen have either died in prison or have been executed. This is an extreme example of how straightforwardly deferring to expert opinion — without considering how those opinions were arrived at — is not only an inadequate truth-seeking strategy, but a potentially harmful one."