Fighting Fire with Fire: The Implications of (Not) Going Negative in a Multiparty Election Campaign

This paper draws upon data collected from an online voting experiment to test the implications of “going negative” in a multiparty election campaign. Specifically, we investigate two sets of questions: First, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to the tone (positive/negative) of their election campaign? Second, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to whether or not all candidates engage in similar (positive/negative) campaigns? While studies of “negative campaigning” have been prominent in the American context, our work builds upon this literature by using an experimental design to test for their effects in a multiparty setting.

Carraro, Luciana and Castelli, Luigi, Breazu, Ioana, Campomizzi, Giulia, Cerruto, Antonella, Massimiliano, and Toto, Ivano. 2012. “Just Ignore or Counterattack? On the Effects of Different Strategies for Dealing with Political Attacks.” European Journal of Social Psychology42: 789–97.

Clifford, Scott and Jerit, Jennifer. 2014. “Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies.” Journal of Experimental Political Science1 (2): 120–31.

Craig, Stephen C. and Rippere, Paulina and Grayson, Marissa Silber. 2014. “Attack and Response in Political Campaigns: An Experimental Study in Two Parts.” Political Communication31 (4): 647–74.

Curini, Luigi. 2011. “Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems: Ideological Closeness and Blames of Corruption in Italy and Japan Using Party Manifesto Data.” Japanese Journal of Political Science12 (3): 399–420.

Daignault, Pénélope, Soroka, Stuart and Giasson, Thierry. 2013. “The Perception of Political Advertising During an Election Campaign: A Measure of Cognitive Emotional Effects.” Canadian Journal of Communication38: 167–86.

Dermody, Janine and Scullion, Richard. 2003. “Exploring the Consequences of Negative Political Advertising for Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Political Marketing2 (1): 77–100.

Lau, R. R.1995. “Information search during an election campaign: Introducing a process-tracing methodology for political scientists.” In Political Judgment: Structure and Process, ed. Lodge, M. and McGraw, K.M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lau, Richard R. and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stevens, Daniel, Sullivan, John, Allen, Barbara, and Alger, Dean. 2008. “What's Good for the Goose is Bad for the Gander: Negative Political Advertising, Partisanship, and Turnout”. The Journal of Politics. 70(2): 527–541.