]]>By: Danhttp://www.ammoland.com/2014/05/maxstop-irp/#comment-1945574 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:13:13 +0000http://ammoland.com/?p=153998#comment-1945574Thank you! Some people are idiots lol. ]]>By: trainerhttp://www.ammoland.com/2014/05/maxstop-irp/#comment-917693 Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:00:57 +0000http://ammoland.com/?p=153998#comment-917693We tested the orginal extensively on breaching doors and penetration tests. At that time we also tested an experimental option designed for wartime use (harder doors in the sandbox I guess)

All performed VERY well. Roughly 18 inches behind the door was safe from the breaching round.

]]>By: Robhttp://www.ammoland.com/2014/05/maxstop-irp/#comment-341530 Wed, 28 May 2014 18:25:24 +0000http://ammoland.com/?p=153998#comment-341530Jamie.. I think the point was that the round did nothing to the clear plastic or glass pane on the other side of the “Bad Guy.” The force of the round was spent by the “Bad Guy.” ]]>By: jamiehttp://www.ammoland.com/2014/05/maxstop-irp/#comment-341382 Wed, 28 May 2014 17:46:02 +0000http://ammoland.com/?p=153998#comment-341382I’m a bit confused, as to why they choose to demonstrate a round that does not over penetrate by shooting it through a wall at a target. ]]>By: Chuckhttp://www.ammoland.com/2014/05/maxstop-irp/#comment-340484 Wed, 28 May 2014 12:06:00 +0000http://ammoland.com/?p=153998#comment-340484I think ammo producers need to quit selling ammo the the cops and military so that prices can come down. This is just the industries way of keeping prices sky high. ]]>By: Dave from San Antoniohttp://www.ammoland.com/2014/05/maxstop-irp/#comment-340195 Wed, 28 May 2014 09:11:36 +0000http://ammoland.com/?p=153998#comment-340195So, per the video…are they advocating shooting through a wall? Could be bad news…if someone other than a “badguy” is behind it. Oh…that’s right…this video was probably for “law enforcement” use…who cares who is on the other side of the wall? ]]>