Saturday, January 31, 2015

LISBON,
Portugal (AP) — Five centuries after burning thousands of Jews at the stake,
forcing them to convert to Catholicism or expelling them, Portugal is granting
citizenship rights to their descendants as part of an attempt to make amends.

The
Portuguese Cabinet on Thursday approved a law offering dual citizenship to the
descendants of those Sephardic Jews — the term commonly used for those who once
lived in the Iberian peninsula.

Like
Spain, Portugal says its sole reason for granting citizenship is to redress a
historic wrong.

"There
is no possibility to amend what was done," Portuguese Justice Minister
Paula Teixeira da Cruz said. "I would say it is the attribution of a
right."

The
measure is the latest step in Portugal's modern efforts to atone for its past
harsh treatment of Jews, whose ranks once numbered in the tens of thousands,
but have been reduced to only about 1,000 today.

In
1988, then-president Mario Soares met with members of Portugal's Jewish
community and formally apologized for the Inquisition. In 2000, the leader of
Portugal's Roman Catholics publicly apologized for the suffering imposed on
Jews by the Catholic Church, and in 2008 a monument to the dead was erected
outside the Sao Domingos church where the massacre of thousands of Jews began
at Easter in 1506.

Jose
Ribeiro e Castro, a lawmaker who was involved in drafting the legislation, sees
the persecution of Sephardic Jews as a "stain" on Portuguese history.

"We
wish it had never happened," Ribeiro e Castro said. "Given that it
did happen, and that it can be put right, we thought we ought to do so."

"We
regard it as an act of justice," Michael Rothwell, a delegate of the
Committee of the Jewish Community of Oporto, said of the new law. He described
it as "another important step toward reconciliation with the past."

The
Portuguese Inquisition, established in 1536, could be more cruel than its
Spanish counterpart. It persecuted, tortured and burned at the stake tens of
thousands of Jews.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Jews prove critical to founding of America

In
1492, Columbus was sent to find a sea route to India and China by the Spanish
Monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella, who had just liberated Spain from 700 years of
Muslim occupying forces.

Statue of Robert Morris, left, George Washington, center, and Jewish financier Haym Solomon, right, in Chicago

Spain
then forced Sephardic Jews to flee.

Some
Jews went to the Ottoman Empire, and some went to Portugal and then went to
Amsterdam. From Amsterdam, some Jews sailed with Dutch merchants to South
America, settling in the city of Recife. In Recife, they built the first
synagogue in the Americas, Kahal Zur Israel Synagogue.

When
Spain and Portugal attacked Recife, the Jews fled again.

Twenty-three
sailed to Port Royal, Jamaica, then, on the French ship Sainte Catherine, they
arrived in 1654 at the Dutch Colony of New Amsterdam, becoming the first Jews
in North America.

Dutch
Governor Peter Stuyvesant attempted to expel them, but they were allowed to
stay, as the Dutch West India Company in Holland considered Spain and Portugal
its main enemies, not Jews or other dissenters.

The
Dutch were in a global contest with Spain and Portugal over possessions in
Indonesia, India, Africa and South America, and so they wanted to quickly
populate the colony of New Netherlands for its defense and profitability.

In
1663, the Dutch West India Company, while officially establishing the Dutch
Reformed faith, instructed Peter Stuyvesant regarding Quakers “and other
sectarians”: “Immigration … must be favored at so tender a stage of the
country’s existence, you may therefore shut your eyes, at least not force
people’s consciences, but allow everyone to have his own belief, as long as he
behaves quietly and legally, gives no offense to his neighbors and does not
oppose the government.”

Jews
in New Amsterdam were not allowed to worship outside their homes or join the
city’s militia.

Then,
in 1664, British forces took control of New Amsterdam, renaming it New York,
and Jews gained more freedom.

In
1730, Jewish citizens in New York bought land and built the small “Mill Street
Synagogue,” the first Jewish house of worship in North America.

During
the colonial era, America’s population grew to 3 million, with a Jewish
population of around 2,000 in seven Sephadic congregations:

·Shearith
Israel, New York City, begun 1655;

·Yeshuat
Israel, Newport, Rhode Island, begun 1658;

·Mickve
Israel, Savannah, Georgia, begun 1733;

·Mikveh
Israel, Philadelphia, begun 1740;

·Shaarai
Shomayim, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, begun 1747;

·Kahal
Kadosh Beth Elohim, Charleston, South Carolina, begun 1749;

·and
Kahal Kadosh Beth Shalom, Richmond, Virginia, begun 1789.

From
the 3rd century on, the teaching of Rabbi Samuel in Babylonia, that “the law of
the land is the law,” resulted in Jews refraining from trying to change their
political situation. The American Revolutionary War was the first time since
being exiled from Jerusalem that Jews fought alongside Christian neighbors as
equals in the fight for freedom.

Jewish
merchants, such as Aaron Lopez of Newport and Isaac Moses of Philadelphia,
sailed their ships past British blockades to provide clothing, guns, powder and
food to the needy Revolutionary soldiers. Some merchants lost everything.

An
estimated 160 Jews fought in the Continental American Army during the
Revolutionary War, such as Lieut. Solomon Bush and Francis Salvador of South
Carolina, the first Jewish State Legislator, who was killed in a Revolutionary
War battle; Mordecai Sheftall of Savannah was Deputy Commissary General for
American troops, 1778; Abigail Minis supplied provisions to American soldiers
in 1779; and Reuben Etting of Baltimore fought and was appointed U.S. Marshall
for Maryland by Jefferson, 1801.

President
Calvin Coolidge recounted, May 3, 1925: “Haym Solomon, Polish Jew financier of
the Revolution. Born in Poland, he was made prisoner by the British forces in New
York, and when he escaped set up in business in Philadelphia. He negotiated for
Robert Morris all the loans raised in France and Holland, pledged his personal
faith and fortune for enormous amounts, and personally advanced large sums to
such men as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Baron Steuben, General St. Clair,
and many other patriot leaders who testified that without his aid they could
not have carried on in the cause.”

In
1975, a U.S. postage stamp honored Haym Solomon, with printing on the back: “Financial
hero-businessman and broker Haym Solomon was responsible for raising most of
the money needed to finance the American Revolution and later saved the new
nation from collapse.”

George
Washington sent a letters to the Jewish Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island,
and in Savannah, Georgia, stating: “May the same wonder-working Deity, who long
since delivered the Hebrews from their Egyptian oppressors, planted them in a
promised land, whose providential agency has lately been conspicuous in
establishing these United States as an independent nation, still continue to
water them with the dews of heaven.”

Ashkenazic
Jews were few in America until a persecution in Bavaria in the 1830s resulted
in many thousands immigrating.

President
Martin Van Buren sent a letter to the Muslim Ottoman Turks requesting that they
stop the killing of Jews in Syria, “on behalf of an oppressed and persecuted
race, among whose kindred are found some of the most worthy and patriotic of
American citizens.”

David
Yulee, “Father of Florida Railroads,” was the first Jew elected to the U.S
Senate in 1845. He was joined in 1853 by Senator Judah P. Benjamin from
Louisiana.

Governor
David Emanuel of Georgia was the first Jewish Governor of any U.S. state.

In
1818, Solomon Jacobs was Mayor of Richmond, Virginia.

Uriah
P. Levy was the first Jewish Commodore in the U.S. Navy, fighting in the War of
1812 and commanding the Mediterranean squadron. He was responsible for ending
the practice of flogging in the Navy. A chapel at Annapolis and a WWII
destroyer were named after him.

When
Jefferson’s Monticello home was decaying, Levy bought it in 1836, repaired it
and opened it to the public. He commissioned the statute of Jefferson that is
in the U.S. Capitol rotunda.

Samuel
Mayer Isaacs, editor of the Jewish Messenger, wrote of the United States, Dec.
28, 1860: “This Republic was the first to recognize our claims to absolute
equality, with men of whatever religious denomination. Here we can sit each
under his vine and fig tree, with none to make him afraid.”

In
1862, the London Jewish Chronicle reported: “We now have a few words of the
Jews of the United States in general. … The Constitution having established
perfect religious liberty, Jews were free in America. … They … in a
comparatively short time, prospered and throve there in a degree unexampled in
Europe.”

At
the time of the Civil War, the population of the United States was 31 million,
including around 150,000 Jews. An estimated 7,000 Jews fought for the Union and
3,000 fought for the Confederacy, with around 600 Jewish soldiers dying in
battle.

Major
Raphael J. Moses was Commissary Officer of Georgia, and after the war began
Georgia’s peach industry.

Whereas
the first Catholic U.S. Army chaplain was appointed during the Mexican-American
War, the first Jewish chaplain was appointed during the Civil War, Rev. Jacob
Frankel of Philadelphia’s Congregation Rodeph Shalom.

On
March 1, 1881, Tsar Alexander II of Russia was assassinated and a pogrom began
against Jews, leading to over 2 million fleeing to America.

By
1916, the United States population was 100 million, of which 3 million were
Jewish.

During
World War I, President Woodrow Wilson wrote: “Whereas in countries engaged in
war there are 9 million Jews, the majority of whom are destitute of food,
shelter, and clothing; driven from their homes without warning … causing
starvation, disease and untold suffering … the people of the U.S. have learned
with sorrow of this terrible plight. … I proclaim Jan. 27, 1916, a day to make
contributions for the aid of the stricken Jewish people to the American Red
Cross.”

Monday, January 26, 2015

Christians’ Love of the Warfare State Is
Killing Other Christians

When Will Evangelical Christians Start To
See Through This Charade?

Chuck Baldwin

Ever
since the George W. Bush administration, evangelical pastors and churches have
been America’s loudest cheerleaders for virtually every act of war the U.S. has
waged against foreign countries. For pastors such as John Hagee, wars of
aggression in the Middle East are predicated upon the notion of protecting
Israel--even though military meddling by the United States has only served to
make life more dangerous for Israel. But leaving Israel out of the equation,
evangelicals are the first to trumpet U.S. wars of aggression. I would even
suggest that the favorite hymn of most evangelical churches these days is no
longer John Newton’s “Amazing Grace,” but John McCain’s “Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb, Bomb Iran.”

I
would go even further to say that evangelical churches have become the very
best friend that the military/industrial complex has ever had. It is
congressmen and senators from districts and states heavily-laden with
evangelical churches that continue to pump unlimited tax-dollars into the
Warfare State. One could even make the argument that in most evangelical
churches, Jesus’ adage “Blessed are the peacemakers” has been changed to
“Blessed are the warmongers.”

Let’s
set the record straight: perpetual war is a tool of elitists and globalists to
enslave the U.S. citizenry. While we are killing thousands of people abroad
(most of whom are innocents)--all in the name of “liberating” them--we are
tightening the tyrannical noose around the necks of the American people. In the
name of the “War on Terror,” the most sophisticated surveillance society in the
history of mankind has been created right here in the continental United
States. With the advent of the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) under G.W. Bush, Washington, D.C., has constructed (and is
continuing to construct) a burgeoning police state the likes of which Joseph
Stalin, Mao Tse-tung, and Adolf Hitler could have only dreamed about. And for
the most part, evangelicals are fine with it.

But
what is really happening in those countries that these endless wars are
supposedly “liberating?” And specifically, what is happening to the thousands
and millions of Christians within those countries after having been “liberated”
by Uncle Sam? After all, America’s evangelical churches of every denomination
spend millions of dollars every year sending missionaries around the globe to
evangelize folks. How many missionary slides have we seen? How many passionate,
tearful sermons have we heard imploring us to get a burden for missions? One of
the most sacred elements of any Christian church is its missions program.

So,
on the one hand, evangelicals are weeping, praying, and giving millions of
dollars to make Christians out of the peoples of the world and on the other
hand, they are leading the charge for America’s efforts to rain death and
destruction down upon those same people.

Aside
from the utter inconsistency of the above, what are all of these endless wars
accomplishing for the Christians who live inside the countries that we are
“liberating?” What is all of these Christian-endorsed wars doing to the people
of God around the world? The answer will shock most believers.

According
to an Infowars.com report, “In areas where we spent hundreds of billions of
dollars and where thousands of precious American lives were sacrificed,
churches are regularly being bombed, Christians are being brutally beheaded,
and laws have been passed to make it illegal for a Muslim to convert to
Christianity. If we were not even able to provide the most basic of
liberties and freedoms to the people living in those nations, what in the world
did we actually accomplish by ‘liberating’ them?

“Just
look at what has happened in Afghanistan. We have been at war in
Afghanistan for more than a dozen years, and yet things are so bad for
Christians in that country at this point that there is not a single church left
. . .”

The
report goes on to say, “We find a similar story in Iraq. It is estimated
that before the invasion, there were up to 2 million Christians living in
Iraq. Now that number is down to less than 450,000, and it is falling
fast.

“In
fact, things are so dire for Iraq’s Christian community that some Iraqi
Christian leaders are warning that Christians may soon become ‘extinct’ in that
nation…”

The
report continues, “In Syria, the Obama administration is shamelessly allying
with radical al-Qaeda jihadists in a desperate attempt to overthrow the Assad
regime.

“As
these jihadists torture, behead and even crucify Christian believers, the mainstream
media in the United States is virtually silent about it.

“Why
is the media being so quiet?

“Well,
because exposing what is going on would make the Obama administration look bad.

Those
carrying out this persecution of Christians in Syria are being directly funded
and aided by the governments of the United States and Saudi Arabia.”

But
remember that these wars of aggression began in earnest under the “Christian”
George W. Bush administration and have been ongoing throughout the Barack Obama
administration. In fact, Obama’s continuation of the Bush preemptive war policy
is the one thing about the Obama administration that most evangelical
Christians actually support.

And
please understand that what has happened to Christians in Middle Eastern
countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria has happened in every other
country that U.S. government has chosen to pressure--either by military
intervention or economic sanction--including Nigeria and The Sudan.

A
report in National Review Online states, “Prominent indicators confirm that the
U.S. is the chief facilitator of the persecution of Christians around the world
today.

“According
to the recently released 2014 World Watch List, which ranks the 50 nations
where Christians are most persecuted, Syria is the third worst nation in the
world in which to be Christian, Iraq is fourth, Afghanistan fifth, and Libya
13th. All four countries receive the strongest designation, ‘extreme
persecution’ (other designations are ‘severe,’ ‘moderate,’ and ‘sparse’
persecution).

“Aside
from being so closely and harshly ranked, these four nations have something
else in common: heavy U.S. involvement. Three--Iraq, Afghanistan, and
Libya--were ‘liberated’ thanks to U.S. forces, while in the fourth, Syria, the
U.S. is actively sponsoring ‘freedom fighters’ against the regime, many of whom
would be better labeled ‘terrorists.’”

The
author of this report, Raymond Ibrahim, concludes by saying, “I am often asked,
‘How can we help persecuted Christians?’ At this point, one must respond: ‘How
about starting with getting the U.S. government to stop being the chief
facilitator of Christian persecution?’ Altruism aside, it would be in the
interests of all freedom-loving people--and especially their descendants.”

I
wonder what the vast majority of evangelical Christians would think if they
realized that their support for all of these preemptive wars around the
world--especially in the Middle East--are actually the major cause of much of
the persecutions against their fellow brothers and sisters in Christ. I shudder
to think what America’s Christians will say to their fellow-believers in Heaven
who were savagely martyred due to the wars of aggression that they, America’s
Christians, so enthusiastically supported.

America’s
Warfare State, complete with the military/industrial complex, is facilitating
the most egregious persecution of Christians since the days of Stalin, Hitler,
and Chairman Mao and is turning the land of the free into a giant police state.
When will the American people start to see through this charade? When will
America’s pastors and Christians start to see through this charade?

If
America’s evangelical pastors and churches would end their constant support for
all of these foreign wars, if they would recognize the danger--globally and
domestically--that the military/industrial complex poses, and if they would
start putting the interests of this country above their parochial
preoccupations with favored foreign states and personal eschatological opinions
and interpretations, the Warfare State would collapse.

The
Church has always been the compass of the country; and right now, the compass
is broken, and the ship of state is way off course.

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Presbyterian Church and Palestinian Liberal Christians
Rewriting the Bible to Remove References to Israel

By Julio
Severo

Sabeel
(Palestinian Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center) has partnered with the Presbyterian Church (USA) to produce a new Bible
version that changes God’s Word.

U.S. Presbyterian delegations celebrating 25 years of the Palestinian Liberation Theology at Sabeel

The
new version has no mention of Israel as Jewish and no mention of Jesus as a Jew.
In fact, Jesus (Yeshua) is changed from being Jewish to being a Palestinian
Arab, according to Geri Ungurean in NowTheEndBegins.

Sabeel
(Arabic ‘the way’ and also ‘a channel’ or ‘spring’) is a Christian liberation
theology organization based in Jerusalem. It was founded by Palestinian
Anglican priest Rev. Naim Ateek, the former Canon of St. George’s Cathedral in
Jerusalem.

According
to Ungurean, Dr. Ateek “wants to rewrite the Bible in the same manner that
Catholic, Anglican and Reformed theologies have claimed that the Christian
Church is ‘The New Israel,’ also called ‘The Israel of God.’ Rewriting history
and inventing theology is a popular vocation. Revisionist historians take
liberties with facts until they cease to have meaning. Prime examples are the
Holocaust denial polemics or current trends to rewrite American history texts.”

Ungurean
says, “An official partner of the Presbyterian Church USA, Sabeel has Friends
of Sabeel chapters in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Sweden,
Denmark, Norway, Ireland, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Australia.”

Sabeel
is involved with the “Christ
at the CheckPoint” conference, which seeks to undermine the
traditional evangelical support for Israel.

Why
would the Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUSA), which is the
largest Presbyterian denomination in the U.S., get involved with Sabeel and its
Liberation Theology?

Liberation
Theology is the most widespread theological liberalism in our days. And PCUSA
is an evidence of its evils. Having firstly embraced the Social Gospel in the
late 19th century, Presbyterians later formed PCUSA, which is now a full-blown
liberal power-house, supporting homosexual “marriage,” abortion and anti-Israel
stances.

Liberation
Theology may be the Social Gospel’s most important offshoot.

A
Presbyterian missionary from the Social Gospel movement came to Brazil in 1952
and spent one decade teaching theology in the most prominent Presbyterian
theological institution in Brazil. His name was Rev. Richard Shaull, and he was
involved in several Marxist and communist causes in Brazil. The birth of the
Theology of Integral Mission (TIM) in Brazil is traced and credited to him.

Even
though TIM is labeled as the Protestant version of Liberation Theology, TIM was
born before Liberation Theology. For more information, download my free e-book
here: http://bit.ly/15AJmMC

TIM
is destroying the Evangelical Church in Brazil. And Liberation Theology is
destroying the Catholic Church in Brazil.

Probably,
TIM contributed for the birth of Liberation Theology in the 1960s. So you see
how powerful the Social Gospel was!

PCUSA
is representative of the future of churches under the Liberation Theology and
TIM spell: supporters of abortion, gay “marriage” and anti-Israel.

At
the end, what does difference make if they change the Bible or not? They do not
care about what God commands and teaches about Israel, the Church, the Kingdom
of God, the value of unborn human life, the natural marriage and family.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Beware of the Revolution Man: Socialist
Billionaire George Soros Spent $33 Million to Turn Ferguson Protest into
National Revolution

By Julio
Severo

Ferguson
protests were much more than about injustice, race or a black teen killed by
police.

Does
it make some sense a white teen killed by a black cop
receiving no significant media attention while a black teen killed by a white
cop receives
massive media attention?

When
a suspicious case does not make sense, follow the money.

According
to the Washington Times, socialist billionaire George Soros donated $33million
to left-wing organizations that helped turn events in Ferguson from a local
protest into a national and international firestorm.

A
high number of activists travelled from many cities across the United States to
pour into Ferguson to turn a local protest into a national revolution.

Buses
of activists from groups including the Drug Policy Alliance, Make the Road New
York, and the Center for Community Change in Washington — all funded in part by
Soros — went to Ferguson beginning in August and went on to organize gatherings
and protests there until late December, according to the Washington Times.

One
of the organizations that Soros funds, and which fueled the demonstrations in
Ferguson, is the Gamaliel Foundation, a network of grass-roots, interreligious
groups. President Barack Obama started his community-organizing career at a
Gamaliel affiliate in Chicago.

The
Gamaliel affiliate in St. Louis — Metropolitan Congregations United — organized
the “Weekend of Resistance” in October, in which clergy members from around the
nation were called to come to Ferguson to protest.

Representatives
of Sojourners, a national socialist evangelical organization headed by Jim
Wallis, attended the weekend. The group received $150,000 from Soros in 2011.

Clergy
representatives from the Samuel Dewitt Proctor Conference (SDPC), where the
Rev. Jeremiah Wright is a trustee, also participated in the protests. Wright
was Obama’s long-time pastor in Chicago. SDPC received $250,000 from Soros in
2011.

How is
Soros able to grant massive funds to socialist groups?

The
billionaire’s fortune was made from speculating on financial markets, most
notably making more than $1billion in the 1990s helping cripple the British financial
system.

Soros
is a well-known supporter of progressive-liberal causes and is a political
donor to Obama’s campaigns. He committed $1 million to Obama in 2012.

He
has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while
forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts
American and international politics and policy.

How
has he influenced in the international scenario?

Has
Soros also used the “Ferguson coup” in other places? Whenever you see a
revolution, follow the money, and do not be scared or surprised if Soros is
involved behind the scenes.

If
you think that the $33 million Soros spent to inflame the Ferguson protest is
much, consider the “mysterious” revolution in Ukraine. “Soros has provided more
than $100 million to support Ukrainian groups,” according to WorldNetDaily,
which also said that “Soros heavily invested in Ukraine crisis.”

Both in
the Ferguson crisis and the Ukrainian crisis, the U.S. government under Obama
has sided with Soros and his plots.

Christians
also have been targeted by Soros’ plots. In 2012, the Center for Constitutional
Rights, a Soros-funded Marxist group, filed
a lawsuit against Rev. Scott Lively for “crime against humanity.”
His crime? He expressed the traditional Christian view on the homosexual
perversions in the Ugandan Parliament.

If
Soros is able to turn a protest into a national revolution, what does it hinder
one of his groups from turning a Christian minister into a “criminal against
humanity”? His specialty is to inflame.

Sadly,
Soros has more plans against Christians. According to the ChristianPost,
he has been funding movements to weaken the tradition evangelical support for
Israel.

Soros
is a Jew. How can a Jew undermine pro-Israel evangelical churches?

In
fact, how can a capitalist billionaire Jew fund so many socialist revolutions,
protests and crisis around the world, from Ferguson to Ukraine?

If
there are betrayers among Christians (and most of them are socialist), why
would not there be equally socialist, betraying Jews?

Next
time you see a suspicious protest turning into a socialist revolution, follow
the money. In the end of the dark rainbow, there is a greedy socialist
capitalist and his plots.

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Malarkey Did Not Go to Heaven: The
Foolishness of Believing that All is False or True

NYT Best-Selling Author Lied About Going to
Heaven

By Julio
Severo

If
you believe that a bad name can bring a curse, consider Alex Malarkey, who says
now he did not die and go to heaven.

He is
co-author of Tyndale House Publishers’ “The Boy Who Came Back From
Heaven,” published in 2010. Now he says that his book is deceptive and he is
blaming Christian retailers for selling it. Because he is recanting the
story of his visit to heaven, mega news outlets — from Time magazine to
DailyMail — are covering his case.

This
seems their golden chance to say, “Hey, there is no Heaven!”

I do
not know the reason for Malarkey to go “malarkey,” an English word that means
“Exaggerated or foolish talk, usually intended to deceive.” But the same world
that loves exaggerated lies is attacking Malarkey’s malarkey.

There
is today a trend of homosexual malarkeys, but the same mega-media that have
condemned “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven” just love to believe that a man
is a woman and vice-versa. They have intensely worked to convince us that the
bogus woman who was born a man is a woman. And they have worked to change minds
and laws in favor of this lie.

Homosexual
malarkeys are the favorite lies today.

About
“The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven,” just because you found a false testimony
it does not follow that all testimonies about Heaven are false. Different is the
homosexual case. You know that all men that say that they are female are liars
because their DNA is male. Nothing can change it. Through DNA, science proves
that a man is a man and a woman is a woman. No one can lie against his own DNA.

The
author of “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven” lied to God, but his lie does not
disqualify other testimonies about heaven.

Two
days ago I read a Facebook comment by an Assemblies of God Brazilian-American
leader using “The Boy Who Came Back From Heaven” to condemn all similar
spiritual experiences. At the same time, he has used his Facebook to promote
and support comments and views by a Presbyterian minister who espouses
socialism and Freemasonry. In fact, this minister is a Freemason himself.

In
the past (70 years ago?) it would be perfectly normal to see a liberal Masonic
Presbyterian minister using a false testimony to condemn all spiritual
testimonies — and, by the way, to condemn also Assemblies of God ministers.

Times
have changed. Now Assemblies of God ministers play the old role of the Masonic
Presbyterian minister.

It is
very unfortunate that Malarkey went malarkey, but God’s Word has never changed.

“Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise
prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every
form of evil.” (1 Thessalonians 5:19-22 ESV)

The big
socialist media that love and spread all homosexual malarkeys is using Malarkey’s
malarkey to disqualify all Christian testimonies about the Heaven.

Christians
should not be an accessory to their malarkeys.

We
should reject malarkeys in our midst without rejecting true testimonies. And we
should reject and denounce all homosexual malarkeys promoted by the big
socialist media.

As to
Alex Malarkey, he should change his surname — Truthtelling, for the sake of a
good Christian testimony.

The
world forgives all homosexual lies, but it never forgives a “Christian” lie.

I
know that all testimonies — loved and promoted by the big socialist media —
that a man is a woman are bogus.

Yet,
I have no presumptuous right to say that all testimonies about Heaven are false
or true. The big socialist media would want you to believe that all of them are
bogus.

If
the media were correct, Apostle Paul, who went to Heaven, would have been a
liar. The problem is: the media love lies.

They
accept the lying testimonies from the darkness and reject the testimonies from
Christians. For them, there are no malarkeys about homosexuality. For
them, some malarkeys among Christians are an evidence that all Christian testimonies
are bogus.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

Gay Magazine Praises Jeb Bush

By
Julio
Severo

Jeb
Bush, the hope for American conservatives in the next U.S. presidential
elections, is flirting with the gay agenda.

Jeb Bush

In an
illuminating article entitled “Why
the Gay Agenda Is Praising Jeb Bush,” Peter LaBarbera says, “It is
becoming apparent that Jeb Bush is the favorite Republican Party presidential
contender of the Washington Blade-D.C.’s ‘gay news source’ — due to his
politically-correct evolution on homosexuality and same-sex ‘marriage.’
The Blade and other liberal media report favorably every time the
former Florida governor moves away from the conservative, pro-family,
Republican platform defending marriage as between man and woman.”

Why
would a homosexual magazine praise Jeb Bush? According to LaBarbera, gay
activists loved the “softer tone” of his reaction when they “overthrew of
Florida’s pro-natural-marriage amendment, which had passed with 62 percent of
the vote in 2008.” Here is Jeb’s speech:

“We live in a democracy, and regardless of our
disagreements, we have to respect the rule of law… I hope that we can show
respect for the good people on all sides of the gay and lesbian marriage
issue—including couples making lifetime commitments to each other who are seeking
greater legal protections and those of us who believe marriage is a sacrament
and want to safeguard religious liberty.”

LaBarbera
says a few hundred thousand Republican voters cast ballots to preserve the
common-sense definition marriage, and Bush says its striking down is a “rule of
law.”

Rule
of homosexual law? Traditionally, socialists — especially from the Democratic
Party — have supported such a “rule.” Now are even Republican politicians
chosen by conservatives flirting with the gay agenda?

LaBarbera
finished by saying,

“It appears Jeb Bush is not up to
the task, but he is not alone among a bevy of GOP governors, politicians and
libertarian-minded pundits who have chosen pandering over principle on this
critical issue that speaks to the character of a nation—a nation that claims to
be ‘under God’ while defying His moral law and created natural order.”

These
incompatibilities and inconsistencies scare away conservative Christians from
Republican demagogues and betrayers.

Good
conservatives have left the GOP, because the GOP has left them and conservative
values.

Conservative
champion Scott Lively run for governor of Massachusetts as an independent
candidate in the last election. By the way, the first U.S. state to legalize
homosexual “marriage” was Massachusetts under Republican Governor Mitt Romney,
elected by conservatives, fully betrayed by their political choice.

Fortunately,
Romney the Betrayer lost the last presidential election.

How
many betrayals will be enough for conservative Christians to wake from the
deception by politicians who cheat them?

We
need an army of Barbers and Livelys — men with solid and uncompromising
conservative convictions.

Monday, January 12, 2015

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama,
Bush, Brzezinski…

By Julio
Severo

Barack
Obama, in his biography “The Audacity of Hope,” says about Muslims, “I will
stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

So if
the Western world begins to reject the U.S. presidential propaganda portraying
Islam as a “religion of peace” and begins to treat this religion as a cowardly
ideology slaughtering innocents, Obama commits himself to side with the
oppressors.

Remember:
by far Islam is the ideology most martyrizing Christians around the world each
year.

It
would be so good if the U.S. had a president who said, “I will stand with
Christians now that the U.S. and Western fad is to flatter Islam.”

Of
course, if some other nation dares to side with Christians and goes against the
Islamic ideology, it will face Obama and U.S. sanctions.

There
is no hope in the two major U.S. parties. The U.S. president who began the
deceptive propaganda of Islam a “religion of peace” was not Obama. It was Bush.
The U.S. policy, in the two parties, shamelessly licks Islamic boots.

So did
everything begin with Bush? No. Everything began decades ago, more strongly
during the Jimmy Carter administration, who was a liberal precursor of Obama.
For Brazil, Carter is remembered as the man who protected Leonel Brizola and
other communists from the military. It was also under Carter that the U.S.
government began to collect papers against the military rule in Brazil. Some
of these papers were delivered to the Brazilian administration of socialist
Dilma Rousseff months ago to help the infamous ‘Truth’ National
Committee.

So
Brzezinski helped in the birth and funding of al-Qaida, which was created to be
a terror for the Soviet Union, but it got completely out of control and
eventually became a terror to the whole world. Brzezinski’s old ally, Osama bin
Laden, later used all his experience as a former CIA agent to torment the world
with his al-Qaida. It is a perfect example of schemes backfiring. Not much
different of ISIS, which, according
to WND, also was born with U.S. assistance.

In
his 1997 book “The Grand Chessboard,” Brzezinski contends that the U.S. have a
worldwide hegemony in the main domains. He says,

“America
stands supreme in the four decisive domains of global power: militarily…
economically… technologically… and culturally.”

The
only area, according to Brzezinski, that is not under total U.S. control is the
Eurasian region, an area of interest for the U.S. (which has no border there),
for Turkey (which occupies a small part of it) and for Russia (which occupies a
major part of that region).

About
Russia’s Islamic neighbors, Brzezinski foresees “something worse” than “the
painful precedents of Chechnya” may happen. “The Grand Chessboard” says, “For
the Russians, the specter of a potential conflict with the Islamic states along
Russia's entire southern flank (which, adding in Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan,
account for more than 300 million people) has to be a source of serious
concern.” Of course, as evidenced by Brzezinski’s anti-Russian pro-Islam
history, if Islam is a big threat to Russia, nothing more strategic than the
U.S. helping in the fulfillment of Brzezinski’s “foresight” by expanding the radical
Islamic influence in those regions.

His
book talks sparingly about worries over communist threat, but it address
abundantly Russia as an enemy to be conquered. Brzezinski’s main worry is to
extend U.S. hegemony to Eurasia.

Partially,
because of those hegemonic ambitions the U.S. keeps its alliance and flattery
to Islam.

By
following this strategy, the U.S.’s supreme message today is, “Islam is a
religion of peace.” This deception has been embraced around the world, because
the nation promoting this propaganda has, according to Brzezinski, the cultural
and technological hegemony and supremacy.

The
Soviet Union ended, but Brzezinski’s anti-Russia pro-Islam strategy remains. He
and his followers will not be satisfied while the U.S. does not extend its
supremacy to Eurasia, whatever it takes. And the cost of that hegemonic
ambition will come through Islam.

Mohammed’s
‘pacifists’ can kill millions of innocents and the only message you are going
to hear from the U.S. mass media is: Islam is a “religion of peace.”

Approximately
100,000 Christians are martyrized each years. The big martyrizer is Islam. Even
so, just because the U.S. has anti-Russia ambitions and wants to extend its
hegemony to Eurasia, you have to swallow down the deceptive propaganda that
Islam is a “religion of peace.”

Deception
helps to kill, especially when it comes from a nation founded by persecuted
evangelicals to help persecuted Christians. To help Islam in the worldwide
persecution of Christians is a total departure from the original mission that
the evangelical Founders had given to America.