Dear Common Dreams Readers: Common Dreams is a small non-profit that exists only because of the support of our readers. No advertising; no paywalls: our content is free. But our costs are real. A free and independent press is essential to the health of a functioning democracy. Independent journalism and democracy itself have never been more fragile, more at risk than now. Without your support, we will not exist. Will you join again with those readers who have come forward to make sure Common Dreams has a future?Every donation makes a difference.

'Torture-Tainted Evidence' Mars US Legal Image: Rights Group

'Torture-Tainted Evidence' Mars US Legal Image: Rights Group

by

The use of torture to extract evidence from detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba has tarnished the US legal system's image and alienated allies in the war on terror, a rights group said Monday.

"The use of evidence tainted by torture and other inhuman treatment is pervasive and systematic in the cases of prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay, and has already infected legal judgments made there," Human Rights First said in a report titled "Tortured Justice."

By hearing testimony extracted under torture when trying Guantanamo detainees, the United States is "tainting the legitimacy of the proceedings, both at home and in the eyes of the international community; alienating US allies and empowering terrorists," it said.

A Pentagon spokesman defended the legal process set up to try "war on terror" detainees.

The Human Rights First report "makes ill-founded assumptions about the evidence upon which our military prosecutors will rely," said Commander Jeffrey Gordon.

"In fact, military prosecutors are building cases based on solid evidence that will withstand the scrutiny under both the law and in the eyes of the public," he said.

The report was released two days after President George W. Bush vetoed legislation on intelligence funding because it called for interrogation methods to be limited to techniques outlined in a US military manual.

That would have excluded waterboarding, a method of simulated drowning widely seen as a form of torture.

In vetoing the bill on Saturday, Bush called hardcore interrogation methods "one of the most valuable tools in the war on terror," and praised them for preventing another attack on the United States, such as those on September 11, 2001.

But according to scientific studies and former interrogators cited in Monday's report, torture and other forms of cruelty do not produce useful evidence.

"There is no scientific record that establishes that torture and coercion are going to produce accurate or reliable information," said Avi Cover, co-author of the report.

"Tortured Justice" quoted former FBI interrogator Jack Cloonan as saying the abusive interrogations conducted at the US detention facility at Guantanamo were "a complete and unmitigated failure."

Better results were obtained by providing suspects with legal representation and giving them a fair hearing.

"A tremendous amount of information came our way as a result of treating people humanely," Cloonan was quoted as saying.

The military commissions at Guantanamo were created by an act of Congress in 2006, which also allowed coerced evidence to be used against some suspects.

"This system flies in the face of law that has been in place for more than 200 years in this country and taints the legitimacy of the proceedings at home and internationally," said HRF's Debra Colson, one of the lead authors of the report.

Allowing evidence obtained by torture would be "inconsistent with the justice system of a civilized society", said Cover.

The report cites the cases of six Guantanamo detainees who were allegedly abused by US government interrogators, but also covers interrogations that took place at secret rendition prisons operated by the United States in Afghanistan, Iraq, "all over," said Cover.

"The techniques go well beyond waterboarding. Stress and duress techniques were quite common and alleged by many people. Beatings, isolation, sensory deprivation were alleged by many," he said.

"These tactics were part of the catalogue of interrogation techniques used by communist countries during the Cold War that were studied and many times adopted by the CIA," Cover said.

"While it was found often that they produced statements, they have no real record of producing reliable information."

Torture and other inhuman treatment are banned under US criminal, military and international law, the report said.

"The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that due process prohibits the government's use of involuntary statements extracted through psychological pressure, physical intimidation, torture or other mistreatment," it said.

"As the military commission proceedings gather momentum in 2008, the American public and the international community will be watching," it added.

Further

In the vile wake of Charlottesville - those sweaty young white men, pasty faces contorted, screaming, "Blood and Soil!" "Jews Will Not Replace Us!" "Fuck You Faggots!" - what to say? Just this: This is racism, domestic terrorism, pure hate. This is not who we are, and this is not ok. Most vital, those "whose pigmentation matches theirs" must speak "with unflinching clarity (or) we simply amen it... They need white faces speaking directly into their white faces, loudly on behalf of love."

Common Dreams brings you the news that matters.

Sign up for Newsletter

Connect With Us

X

Your Support Makes A Difference: Over 90% of the Common Dreams budget comes from reader support. We rely on you. Will you join again with those readers who have come forward to make sure Common Dreams has a future? We can't do it without you.