Labour needs a Corbynista leadership in Scotland

The Scottish Labour leadership contest this autumn is important for the entire Labour Party in Britain, because how the party performs in Scotland will be a significant factor in whether Labour can form the next UK government. For Labour to win it is vital Scottish Labour improves on its poor performances at the 2015 and 2017 general elections. That requires the Scottish party to change its political orientation. A new leadership is needed that will promote Jeremy Corbyn’s popular anti-austerity agenda to the Scottish electorate.

Scotland is key to Labour securing a majority at Westminster. Currently Labour would need to gain an extra 64 seats at the next general election; of these 18 – that is more than a quarter – are in Scotland.

Winning an extra 18 seats for Labour in Scotland is unlikely if Scottish Labour continues positioning itself to the right as it has done in recent years, as this has resulted in a catastrophic fall in support for Labour in Scotland – as is argued below – and from which it scarcely began to recover in 2017.

Scotland is represented at Westminster by 59 MPs and, until the 2015 election, was regarded as a Labour stronghold. But that changed dramatically in 2015. In 2005 Labour won 40 MPs in Scotland, in 2010 it won 41, but in 2015 Scotland only returned a single Labour MP, and this was only improved to seven in 2017. At the same time, the Tory vote has considerably recovered; from being almost eliminated from Scottish politics, after this year’s general election the Scottish Tories have more MPs than Scottish Labour for the first time in over 60 years.

Scottish Labour’s 2017 failure

At this year’s general election the Tories gained 12 new seats in Scotland, whereas they made a net loss of 25 seats across the rest of Britain. It is these 12 Tory gains in Scotland that gave Theresa May the numbers to form an alliance with the DUP and establish her minority government.

The number of votes received by the different parties in the 2015 and 2017 general elections, and the changes between the two, reveal the scale of Scottish Labour’s failure this year.

The table below sets out the votes for the main political parties in 2015 and 2017 for Britain as a whole and for Scotland and the changes between the two elections. The graphs illustrate the difference between the voting changes in Britain and Scotland. The figures draw on an excellent analysis by former MSP Lesley Brennan – which everyone who wants Labour to succeed in Scotland should read.

Table 1: Votes cast for the main parties at the 2015 and 2017 general elections and change in vote

Figure 1: Change in votes cast for main parties from 2015 to 2017 general election

At the 2017 general election, in Britain Labour secured the largest increase in numbers of votes – adding 3.5 million to its 2015 total, in comparison to the Tories who added 2.3 million votes. In Scotland on the other hand it was the Tories that made by far the largest gains – gaining an additional 0.3 million votes, with Labour securing less than 10,000 extra votes. Less than 10,000 votes gained by Labour in Scotland when it added 3.5 million in the country as a whole! In Britain as a whole Labour gained more than 15 extra votes for every ten the Tories gained. In Scotland the Tories gained more than 320 votes for every 10 extra votes Labour gained. This miserable failure is why Kezia Dugdale had to go – and should have gone earlier.

The differences in performance between the parties in Scotland and Britain as a whole speak for themselves.

Scottish Labour’s 2017 failure was rooted in its electoral strategy. It was unable to take advantage of the fact that the run up to Polling Day saw a sharp fall in support for the SNP relative to its 2016 Scottish Parliament and 2015 general election performances. The SNP’s vote share at the 2017 general election was 36.9 per cent, down from 50 per cent in 2015.

Scottish Labour’s leadership entirely failed to take advantage of this decline in SNP support, which it could have done by shifting the ground from for or against Scottish independence – which polarises the debate between the SNP on the one hand and the pro-Union Tories on the other – to setting an agenda against austerity which would have polarised the debate between the SNP and the Tories on one side, and Labour on the other.

Instead, Kezia Dugdale’s campaign continued the, already tested and failed, strategy of primarily opposing the SNP and Scottish independence, in a de facto alliance with the other pro-unionist parties, the Tories and the Lib Dems. Labour voters in Scotland are very much divided on the issue of independence, whereas the issue of the union unites SNP and Tory supporters into opposing camps. Choosing to polarise the electorate on the issue of the union rather than on the issue of austerity inevitably aided the most pro-unionist party, the Tories, to make the biggest advance in the context of some significant decline in support for independence in Scotland following the 2016 vote for Brexit in the EU referendum.

An independent Scotland in the context of a soft border with the rest of the UK as both would be in the EU – the context of the 2014 independence debate – is a very different prospect from an independent Scotland with a hard border with the rest of the UK, which is Scotland’s main trading and economic partner. Customs and immigration controls with the rest of the UK would have a huge adverse impact on the Scottish economy and living standards. When, after the EU referendum, the SNP called for a second independence referendum it found itself clashing with a shift in opinion amongst Scottish voters that was going in the opposite direction.

But by continuing to present the SNP as the main enemy in Scotland, rather than turning Labour’s fire on the Tories, while letting the political process work through in reducing the SNP’s vote, Kezia Dugdale’s policy tail-ended the Tories’ Scottish agenda and de facto aided the surge in support for the Tories.

As it did in the rest of Britain, Labour could have made significant gains in Scotland by prioritising promoting Corbyn’s anti-austerity policies. It did not do this, but instead just gave formal support to Corbyn’s manifesto and focussed its attacks on the SNP and anti-independence, not the Tories and anti-austerity.

Scottish Labour needs to fight the Tories

The graph below showing vote shares of the main parties at the last three general elections in Scotland illustrates how the votes have shifted since 2010, covering the period of the 2014 independence referendum, the 2015 General Election, the 2016 EU referendum and Scottish Parliament elections and the 2017 General Election this year.

From 1964 through to 2010 Labour secured the largest vote share in Scotland at every general election. It lost that lead in 2015, when its vote share collapsed to 24.3 per cent from 42 per cent in 2010. That share only rose to 27.1 per cent in 2017.

It is the right wing policies of Scottish Labour over this period that lay behind this, and should now be changed.

From before the Scottish Independence referendum in 2014 Scottish Labour has positioned itself to the right of the SNP and its prime focus has been to attack the SNP, not the Tories. It is this orientation – reinforced by a number of right wing policies – that has led to the slashing of Labour support over this period, and also contributed to the sharp rise in the SNP and, in 2017, the recovery of the Tories.

A key element of this has been the reality that Scottish Labour has prioritised opposing the SNP in Scotland over maintaining clear water between Labour and the Tories, whose austerity policies under Cameron and now May were responsible for real falls in Scottish working class living standards.

A huge error was the approach to the independence referendum in 2014. Instead of Labour running its own progressive ‘No’ campaign, Scottish Labour allied with the Scottish Tories, who were explicitly mobilising ‘No’ votes with appeals to a sectarian, unionist, anti-Catholic agenda. Labour put no clear separate progressive case for No, until Gordon Brown was brought in very late in the day, and the whole referendum campaign reinforced an emerging trend in Scottish politics of polarisation between pro-independence support for the SNP, and pro-union support going to the Tories. Continuing this orientation in 2017, when it was clearly well past its sell-by date, if it was every within one, has helped rehabilitate the Tories.

Additionally, this association with the pro-austerity Tories undermined Labour support on living standards and the economy, further driving a dramatic decline in its support in the run up to the 2015 general election. Under the leadership of Jim Murphy, Scottish Labour – and also UK Labour – attacked the SNP on austerity and cuts from the right. This assisted the SNP’s rise from 19.9 per cent in 2010 to 50 per cent in 2015.

Tax rises on everyone are vote losers

Under the leadership of Kezia Dugdale, Scottish Labour compounded these problems by campaigning on a pledge for an across the board tax increase of 1p. Some on the left mistakenly supported this policy, but a regressive, across-the-board, tax increase hitting lower and middle income groups, not just the top earners, even it is only 1p, was unpopular across the electorate. This is entirely different from the proposal in UK Labour’s 2017 manifesto to tax the top 5 per cent. With living standards declining in Scotland, voters decisively rejected this pledge of higher taxation for all.

At 2016’s Scottish Parliament election Labour’s vote share fell by 8.2 per cent from its 2011 share to 20.8 per cent, and for the first time in such elections Labour slipped to third place in vote share, behind both the SNP and the Tories. Neither of the latter two parties were planning to impose such tax rises.

The 2016 voting pattern was broadly repeated in the May 2017 local elections when the SNP secured 32.3 per cent of first preference votes, the Tories 25.3 per cent and Labour 20.2 per cent, Labour again dropping to third place.

In the 2017 general election campaign Dugdale continued to promote her 1p tax increase. Plus, in parts of Scotland it was reported she was encouraging voters to vote Tory to defeat the SNP.

To win Scottish Labour needs a change in directions

Scottish Labour’s recent leaderships have promoted a right-wing agenda and policies that have alienated large sections of Labour’s previous support. A new leadership direction is urgently needed, that focuses on repairing that damage.

In order to recover its position Scottish Labour needs its own version of Jeremy Corbyn’s policy agenda focussed on how to make people better off, clearly positioning Labour to the left of the SNP on living standards. No new taxes should be proposed that make those on low or middle incomes worse off, protecting 95 per cent of the population should be a priority in Scotland, with policies developed for Scotland in line with UK Labour’s general election manifesto. And Scottish Labour should re-establish that it is the Tories, not the SNP, that are Labour’s principal opponent in British politics. The Tories UK government and its austerity policies are responsible for falling living standards in Scotland, so the Scottish Labour should keep the Tories in its crosshairs, taking up the SNP when it fails to oppose the Tories, rather than vice versa.

Corbynism has shaken up politics in England and Wales. In Scotland, with a change of leadership, it could do likewise and rebuild Labour support for the elections ahead.

Richard Leonard MSP is standing for Scottish Labour Leader. He is the candidate most supportive of Corbyn’s leadership and his campaign on Facebook can be found here.

Nominations open on Monday 11 September; the last date to join as member, affiliated supporter, or registered supporter, in order to vote in the Leadership ballot is Monday 9 October; the ballot opens on Friday 27 October; and closes on Friday 17 November (12 noon).

9 Comments

Spot on. Labour will only move forward in Scotland once it fully embraces what the rest of the UK knows: that the Corbyn-led movement resonates with working class and middle income people.
The dirty deal with the Tories and the LibDumbs during the 2014 Independence referendum was a disaster and Dugdale’s attempts to cosy up to both parties has compounded that senseless decision.

Interesting, if disturbing, graphs. It would be good to have some analysis of how Scottish Labour could plummet from 42% to 24.3% in just two years. That surely indicates a deeply dysfunctional party.

Looking at Scottish Labour from afar (London) I have been struck by the very poor quality of the Party leaders (Lamont, Murphy, Dugdale). The problem for me was also that the challenges from the left seemed almost as weak.

I see that the membership is now growing significantly. I hope that will be the basis for some thoughtful politics combined with a move to the left for the Scottish Party. It needs it.

P.S. I just noticed that as well as being on the Political Council of the neo-conservative transatlantic think tank the Jackson Society, Jim Murphy took up an employed position in November 2016 as an adviser to Tony Blair. With advice like that what can go wrong?

If you think the graphs look bad now, wait and see what they look like after this leadership election is over.
Candidate 1. Anas Sarwar – Privately educated multi millionaire. Shareholder in the family business AWS. AWS does not recognise trade unions nor pay the living wage.
Candidate 2. Richard Leonard – Privately educated career politician. Outside of politics and trade unionism never had a job.

Richard MacKinnon is a Tory Troll, just shit-stirring again, after retiring in embarrassment for some time post June 8th from Left Futures comments , following his uber confident prediction of a General Election wipeout for Labour !

Subscribe!

On Facebook

By Gianluca Ferrara Almost nobody talks of the war in Yemen. It is a conflict that reveals how disgusting and dangerous our trading partners are in the Middle East. Amid international indifference, Yemen and its 28 million inhabitants are suffering from the consequences of Saudi Arabia’s criminal policies since March 2015. The Yemeni Houthi rebels, […]

Up to 4,000 workers at Amazon’s despatch centre at Piacenza in northern Italy will be striking for better pay and conditions on Black Friday. In addition, the workers organised by the unions Tertiary Ugl, Fisascat-Cisl, Filcams-Cgil, and Uiltucs-Uil decided on an overtime ban until 31 December, hitting Christmas shopping. Amazon’s strong growth justifies a more […]

“Jamaica” coalition talks collapsed on Sunday night after Christian Lindner (Fdp) said no to governing with the CDU and Greens, and Angela Merkel was forced to acknowledge that the margins for negotiation were depleted. For Lindner the biggest obstacle lay in defining the political line on European issues. Federico Ferraù caught up with Italian economist […]

Vittorio Agnoletto does not regret his native Milan lost out to Amsterdam in the bid to replace London as home of the European Medicines Agency. His concerns lie elsewhere The European Medicines Agency will move to Amsterdam, it has been decided by a draw. This has left a bitter taste in the mouth of Italians […]

About Left Futures

Meta

Left Futures

Left Futures is a new Labour Left network. If you want to get involved as a contributor, please contact James Elliott using the form on this page.
Header images: Wind farm [credit]. Balloons [credit] and crowd scene [credit].