> > I think fs sector size != disklabel sector size is useful if one
> > needs to have two or more different FS on one disk (like normal FS and
> > CD image).
>
> Uh, if you're making the 'normal FS', why not simply make it with the
> larger sector size?
I have one free partition ( I'm too lazy to repartition :-)
> Maybe it's just me, but I tend to build disk images either in files
> (vnd) or on seperate physical disks...
Since vnd has no disklabel, I think FS code doesn't care about
disklabel sector size. Am I wrong ?
--
Zdenek Salvet salvet@ics.muni.cz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If God had meant for us to be in the Army,
we would have been born with green, baggy skin.