Re: Object-relational impedence

On 17 mar, 14:16, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail..._at_dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:52:37 +0000, S Perryman wrote:
> > Perhaps even Dijkstra himself said this.
>
> >> *CS is as much about computers then Astronomy is about telescopes*
>
> > Astronomy without telescopes is merely staring into the night sky.
>
> Dijkstra should have said "Astrology"...
Putting Astrology on the same stance than Astronomy is like putting
Alchemy on the same stance than Chemistry. One is science the other
is just hustler's way of doing things...You are a part of the second
category.

> Or, is it abstraction [away]
> of logical model went too far? So far that some of our honored posters from
> c.d.t. (surely otherwise sensible and intelligent gentlemen) just do not
> notice their fingers keeping on typing nothing but "fool", "idiot",
> "moron."
Sometimes one had to call a spade a spade. That you are an idiot is
not a assumption but a fact based on the endless gobberish you have
been posting.