Still in terms of math and extended mining you should yield the same btc in a larger or smaller pool (obviously) but still I think so many people have used cg miner or it's various 'mutations' over the years...... if you never contributed to it or sent btc......... joining the pool might be a way of showing some support !! For me the first time I got cgminer to compile I felt like a godess for 2 days. I cannot imagine all the hard work and testing ect... that had to go into coding a project like that......

Payout 337818 sent ... and also if anyone didn't know? S5 works fine on the pool

What kind of invalid share % are you getting for the S5? I'm pushing .35 compared to the other stuff of less then .10.

Update, the last 5,000 shares, 6 hrs, I've got (at diff 1024) have only been 0.263% invalid.I just changed queue from 8192 to 1 to see if that helps also.

I pointed 2 S5 to the pool. Workers 2 and 3 stock, didn't mess with the voltage yet. .27 and .29 invalids. Other pools I tested these on have gotten as high .75 this being the best so far being located in Sothern Nevada.

Payout 337818 sent ... and also if anyone didn't know? S5 works fine on the pool

What kind of invalid share % are you getting for the S5? I'm pushing .35 compared to the other stuff of less then .10.

Update, the last 5,000 shares, 6 hrs, I've got (at diff 1024) have only been 0.263% invalid.I just changed queue from 8192 to 1 to see if that helps also.

Edit - I deleted your 1st copy below of the same post.

No worries. I am on here a lot while I am monitoring network traffic at the job so I have to read type post quickly.

Best share is working now in the miner status after restarting them. I don't remember if it was working before on this pool it wasn't for any of the other pools I tested. Not really high on my priory list. I am letting the pool dictate work diff for S5s for about an hour now. Interesting that the pool gives an exact diff not the normal 512 1024 etc. A lot of work went into this. Thanks.