Respondent appeals as of right from an order terminating his parental rights to his two
adopted children pursuant to MCL 712a.19(3)(b)(i) and (ii), (g), (j), (k)(iii) and (iv), and (n).
Because the trial court did not clearly err in finding clear and convincing evidence for
termination of parental rights, and termination was not clearly contrary to the children?s best
interests, we affirm.
The evidence established that respondent sexually assaulted his son. Moreover, the
evidence showed that the son?s bedroom was a windowless crawl space in a Michigan basement
that also housed a sump pump, furnace and hot water heater. It was accessible by a ladder
through a trap door in respondent?s bedroom closet.
Respondent argues that termination of rights was in error since there was no showing of
reasonable efforts to reunite him with the children. However, reunification was never a goal and
such efforts were not required. MCL 712A.19b(4) and MCR 3.997(E) authorize an order
terminating parental rights at the initial dispositional hearing if a petition seeking termination is
filed. In this case, termination of respondent?s parental rights was expressly sought in the