Homework 5: Heuristic Evaluation of Each Other's
Implementations

Assigned: Mon, June 17, 2013; Due: Mon,
June 24, 2013 at 10:30am EDT (note: no late turn-ins for
HW5!)

Each person will evaluate the user interfaces of two other people in the class. After you turn in your system for Homework 4, the TA will e-mail you the two systems you are to evaluate. You can also see the assignment of systems to people
on Blackboard.

You will be getting two (2) systems. You should write a heuristic evaluation of the site using Neilsen's Ten Usability
Heuristics. (There are lots of different lists of heuristics, but for this
assignment, you must use only the ones that Nielsen
lists). Although two people are assigned to evaluate each project. you
should do the evaluation individually.

Your report can include both problems and things done well, but it is better to list problems.

You should include pictures of the system that illustrate each of your points (either
directly in the "Prototype Screen" column as in the example, or below
the table with a hyperlink reference, as in the template). You can use screen captures to do this (on a PC, the print screen key puts the screen on the clipboard; on a
Mac, command-shift-4 let's you pick a selection on the screen to send to a file, command-control-shift-4 puts it on the clipboard).

Each point should be annotated with the particular Name of Heuristic that
is being violated or being followed (put this in the "Name
of Heuristic" slot). If violated, you might suggest a fix in
the Way(s) to rectify column.

For each system you are assigned, you
must list at least 8 (eight) points that illustrate at least 4 (four) different guidelines. I am looking for insight, subtlety and depth. Thus, saying "the system doesn't have good color choices because it doesn't use color" is pretty trivial and won't count for much.
Also, since this is a prototype, saying that functions aren't implemented
also doesn't count. For example, prototypes generally won't have "documentation and help" so it is not useful to point that out.

Be sure each row lists which heuristic is violated or upheld, and why, and
what you recommend be done about it. Be sure it is clear in your description whether you
are saying the interface violates the heuristic or does it well.

You will be graded for this homework on how well you evaluate the prototype, the quality of the feedback you are providing, how many problems and good things you found, and the extent to which you assign them to the correct heuristics.

In homework 6, you will be trying to fix the problems that other people identified with your system,
and your grade will be based in part on your response to your classmate's Heuristic Analysis of your prototype (what you did based on what they found), so it is important to you
to make sure your classmate gets a chance to evaluate your prototype.

The deliverable for this assignment are two HE Report templates
filled out, one for each of the
systems you evaluated. This will be at least 2 (systems) x 8 (items) = 16
items.

Please keep the documents as two files, so that
we can email them to the people whose projects you evaluated. Please name
your two files as follows: HE-Report-of-otherPersonsName-from-yourname.
For example, if one of the systems I was evaluating was by Stephanie Chow, my
file about that evaluation would be named: HE-Report-of-Chow-from-Myers.docx.

Collect all your files together into one zip file, and upload the one zip file named HCI-HW5-lastname-firstname.pdf to Blackboard, as described in the submitting instructions.