On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2007 1:18 PM, Gregory Hicks <ghicks at cadence.com> wrote:
>>>>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:11:14 -0800
>>> From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
>>> To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: nanog-futures at nanog.org>>> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
>>>>>>> Should we remove this person or not?
>>>>>> why? just because he calls you on your bs? pfui! pick on someone your
>>> own size.
>>>> It seems to be a cut and dried case of "mail bouncing". If mail
>> bounces, the address is "not good" and should be removed.
>>>> I would NOT remove him for the content of the messages though but for
>> mail connectivity. (White listing could have solved the connectivity
>> issue.)
>>>>> Not for the content. Randy is a little excitable since he and the SC
> have been marginalized for the most part. AUP Item #8 seems to apply.
> I'm asking if it's what people really want.
no, that's not what I want.
- Lucy
>>> -M<
>> _______________________________________________
> Nanog-futures mailing list
>Nanog-futures at nanog.org>http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures>