When the anti-gun Mayors Against Illegal Guns (MAIG) released a "study"
parroting previously discredited lies, most major media outlets turned
into Michael Bloomberg's puppets

A lot of things have changed since 1989. Back then, the musical group
New Kids on the Block were still kind of new, Barack Obama was a
first-year student at Harvard Law School and had not yet written even
one autobiography, and what we today call "the old media" was just "the
media."

But some things haven't changed: That same media continues to report as
fact the fabrications and falsehoods of the anti-gun lobby. No matter
how often NRA and other civil rights advocates provide the media with
corrections, the media go right on reporting the same old untruths.

Back in the day, the media kept reporting that "assault weapons" were
super-powerful machine guns that were frequently used by criminals. NRA
kept explaining that these so-called "assault weapons" didn't fire
bigger bullets, and they fired one round every time the trigger was
pulled. And police gun seizure data from coast to coast showed that
criminals rarely used these guns.

Yet the media continued repeating the same old lies, and thus paved the
way for the Clinton-Feinstein-Schumer bill that outlawed 19 guns by
name, plus 200 more by generic definition, and also banned magazines
holding more than 10 rounds.

The Clinton gun ban expired in 2004, but today the media are leading the
charge to reimpose it and make it permanent. This time, the pretext is
that American guns are the cause of Mexico's crime problems. Again, much
of the media relentlessly repeat the propaganda of the gun prohibition
lobby, while ignoring repeated evidence that those claims are wrong.

Since 2008, most major media have insisted that the United States is the
source of 90 percent of "Mexican crime guns." America's 1st
Freedom, and many other sources, has repeatedly pointed out the
problems with this factoid:

The large majority of guns seized by Mexican police are never submitted
to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE)
offices in Mexico for tracing.

There are many reasons a gun may not be submitted. The national
government of Mexico has a comprehensive firearms registry, so any gun
that was once legally possessed in Mexico would be found on the
registry, without need for a U.S. trace. Corrupt Mexican law enforcement
officials sometimes refuse to allow BATFE to trace large arms caches.
Sometimes Mexican officials just keep seized guns for themselves. Guns
with obvious origins outside the U.S. (e.g., those with Chinese
manufacturing markings) are not submitted for American tracing. Also,
guns on which serial numbers have been removed are not submitted.

Moreover, according to BATFE, the large majority of Mexican trace
requests submitted to BATFE fail. This means that--despite 42
years of American recordkeeping about the manufacture (or import),
wholesale distribution and retail sale of every American
firearm--no records could be found. This suggests that many of the seized
guns did not, in fact, originate in the U.S.

Additionally, even a successful trace does not prove that agents of the
Mexican cartels purchased the gun in the U.S. To the contrary, we know
that the cartels have set up gangs in the U.S. to steal American guns
and smuggle them into Mexico.

Finally, we know that the cartels have been caught with enormous
supplies of grenades, rocket launchers, machine guns and other military
weapons--none of which can be purchased over the counter at a gun store
in Texas or Arizona. This indicates that the cartels have extensive
supplies from a global black market of weapons stolen from national
armies or sold by corrupt military or police officers.

Yet, only rarely are these facts mentioned in the so-called "mainstream"
American media. Instead, the media continues churning out stories
blaming American gun owners for Mexican gun crime.

For example, in September, billionaire New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg
put out another "study" blaming America's Second Amendment freedoms for
Mexican violence. The study came from Bloomberg's self-funded group,
Mayors Against Illegal Guns (MAIG). (A more accurate name would be
Illegal Mayors Against Guns, since many of the mayors in the group have
been convicted of crimes, and since the group supports every gun control
scheme possible.)

The Bloomberg group, using data from BATFE, announced that 90 percent of
traced Mexican guns come from the United States, and 75 percent from the
four border states of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California.

As expected, much of the media--having no inclination to investigate the
veracity of the study--parroted Bloomberg's 90 percent figure as fact.

A story from the ABC News "Investigative Team" began: "A shocking new
report obtained by ABC News ..." Well, "obtaining" the report was, despite
the story's implication, not exactly a feat of Woodward and
Bernstein-style sleuthing. MAIG sent out press releases en masse to tout
the report.

The report was further publicized by taxpayer-funded press releases from
the mayoral offices of the members of Bloomberg's group, such as Boston
Mayor Thomas Menino and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

ABC found the figures "shocking," although they're essentially the same
misleading figures that have been all over the media for the last two
years.

ABC also sensationalized Mexico's "unprecedented bloodshed." Actually,
the 2009 homicide rate in Mexico was 14 per 100,000, the same as it was
in 2000. Nor did ABC inform readers that even Mexico's President Felipe Calderón has admitted that the vast majority of homicides are drug gangsters
killing each other.

Instead of reporting the MAIG factoid so credulously, ABC should have
done a bit of investigation of its own. If ABC had, it might have found
this statement, about an earlier version of the Mexico trace factoid:

"DHS [U.S. Department of Homeland Security] officials believe that the
87 percent statistic is misleading as the reference should include the
number of weapons that could not be traced (i.e., out of approximately
30,000 weapons seized in Mexico, approximately 4,000 could be traced and
87 percent of those--3,480--originated in the United States.) Numerous
problems with the data collection and sample population render this
assertion as unreliable." (See p. 69 of the Government Accountability
Office report available at
www.gao.gov/new.items/d09709.pdf.)

In fact, in a 16-paragraph story, ABC's investigator did not include a
single word of perspective from a different viewpoint.

One rule of good journalism is to not just turn a press release into a
news article. A press release can be used as a starting point, but
additional reporting should be done. Unfortunately, the BNO News wire
(which provides news to MSNBC, among others) essentially rewrote the
MAIG press release into a "news story," while adding no new content.

Over at AOL News, Dana Chivvis wrote a more balanced story. She reported
the 90 percent factoid from MAIG, but also pointed out that previous
stories by FOX News and theExaminernewspaper had pointed out
the flaws of the "90 percent" factoid.

Unlike ABC and many others, she was neutral as to who was right,
writing, "No matter whose count you believe ..."

It was commendable that she informed readers that there were two points
of view.

It would have been even better if she had dug into the different
sources. Then, she would have discovered that the high and low figures
are compatible. Only a fraction of Mexican crime guns are submitted to
BATFE for tracing, and of the trace requests, most fail. But for the
trace requests that succeed, most do find a U.S. origin.

The rest of the article discussed other gun issues, some not accurately.
For example: "ATF can't fine those dealers who sell guns illegally--it
can only revoke the dealer's license." It's true that BATFE can't impose
administrative fines, but if a gun dealer is knowingly selling guns
illegally, BATFE can refer the case to the local U.S. Attorney's Office
for criminal prosecution. If the dealer is found guilty, the court can
send him to prison for many years, and also impose enormous fines.

Homeland Security Today, a news website and digital magazine, is not
written for a mass audience; however, special publications for people
who work in or with federal departments and agencies can be very
influential to their select audience. The MAIG report got a 20-paragraph
story from Homeland Security Today--an entirely one-sided presentation of
MAIG's viewpoint. If you wonder why some people in the Department of
Homeland Security are hostile to gun ownership, articles like this are
one reason.

Globally, there's no more influential magazine than The Economist,
a newsweekly published in London. Since 1843, it has established a
stellar reputation for trenchant analysis, careful reporting and
incisive, crisp writing. Critics, though, complain that The Economist
is not as good as it used to be, and that it often reflects the smug
worldview of the Oxford University graduates who predominate at the
magazine.

I don't know enough background facts to discern whether The Economist's
stories about German coal mining are reliable, but I do know that the
American coverage tends to align with the conventional wisdom of the
East Coast's establishment.

Plenty of The Economist stories on the U.S. are often
under-reported. Consider The Economist's Sept. 30 piece on the
Bloomberg research. The article quoted MAIG's self-description of being
dedicated "to protecting the rights of Americans to own guns, while
fighting to keep criminals from possessing guns illegally." That would
actually be a good description of NRA, but it's not really accurate for
MAIG. Claiming that ordinary Americans have no right at all to
possess guns, MAIG kingpin Michael Bloomberg filed an amicusbrief in Heller.

In a few sentences, The Economist adequately summarized the main
points of the MAIG report on Mexico, and another MAIG report on firearm
traces within the United States.

The Mexico study, wrote The Economist, "has attracted the sort of
response one might expect: Andrew Arulanandam, director of public
affairs for the National Rifle Association, called Mayors Against
Illegal Guns, 'intent on enacting some form of gun control,' and
predicted that people would be 'wary about believing so-called studies
that come from groups that have an interest in the outcome.' And he
ought to know."

How droll.

That's the kind of wit and insight you could get for free at the Keith
Olbermann Fan Forum, instead of having to pay money to read in a news
magazine.

Obviously, NRA has a strong point of view on gun issues, and just as
obviously, MAIG has its own viewpoint. The Economist's snarky
point seems to be that if you're biased to pro-gun positions, you're not
supposed to point out that somebody else is biased toward anti-gun
positions.

A serious writer for the old-fashioned Economist would have
talked to a couple of neutral experts (or perhaps one expert from each
side), and synthesized the expert material to provide readers with the
pros and cons of whether the MAIG reports were credible.

The funny thing is, AOL News did a more intellectually rigorous job than
did The Economist, even though in journalistic prestige, The
Economist far outranks AOL News.

Greatly exceeding The Economist'slow standard of coverage on
this issue was an Arizona Daily Stararticle by Brady McCombs.
Most of the article provided the data about how many traced guns had
come from each of the four border states in 2007, 2008 and 2009. McCombs
included a paragraph summarizing two of NRA's reasons for doubting the
90 percent figure: "So many guns are unaccounted for"; and the high
numbers of automatic rifles, grenades and rocket launchers in cartel
hands suggests that cartels have other significant sources of weapons.

The most diligent reporting on the "study" came from the El Paso
Times. Reporter Daniel Borunda interviewed a BATFE official in El
Paso, a spokesperson from the mayor's office in the border town of
Juárez and also asked NRA for comment. (NRA declined as it had not yet
reviewed the study.)

The El Paso Timesalso provided the essential context: "An El
Paso Timesinvestigation last year found that the '90 percent'
figure, which was even quoted by President Barack Obama, refers to only
the percentage of the guns submitted by Mexico to the ATF for tracing
and not all guns seized in Mexico."

As the El Paso Times and Arizona Daily Star articles show,
it would not be accurate to say that all the media are unfair on
firearms reporting. The problem, though, is that the audiences for ABC
News and The Economist dwarf those of local newspapers.

Mayor Bloomberg is very, very good at using the media. He is, after all,
the founder and largest shareholder of Bloomberg L.P., a media empire
with over $6 billion in annual revenue from television, radio, Internet,
print publications and data services. So MAIG is going to continue to
use its expert skills to push anti-gun propaganda throughout the media.

There will always be some conscientious journalists who don't take that
propaganda at face value. But there may be many more--especially at the
top of the media food chain--who will gladly tell their audiences that
whatever Bloomberg says about guns is all they need to know.

Make a donation to support Dave Kopel's work in defense of constitutional
rights and public safety.

Nothing written here is to be construed as
necessarily representing the views of the Independence Institute or as an
attempt to influence any election or legislative action. Please send
comments to Independence Institute, 727 East 16th Ave., Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone 303-279-6536. (email)webmngr @ i2i.org