While Jermaine O'Neal is a great player and all, he does not fit into what the Warriors are doing offensively. I also happen to think his best days are behind him. That does not mean he will not average 20 and 10 the next two or three seasons, but I like the make up the Warriors have right now and I do not want to see any big adjustments messing up the chemistry. Thus, I would not take that trade.

Richardson is still young and I do not want to see him traded.

Dunleavy and Murphy I think could be traded if the right deal comes along, but Stephen Jackson and Jasikevicius are not the type of players I want to see in a Warriors uniform.

Now, if things turn sour for the team, as I don't expect to happen over the course of the season, Nellie and Mullin will have to look into some trade possiblilites of the blockbuster kind to shake things up a bit. But, until things go bad, no need to mess with things in my opinion.

Intriguing trade, but more for what we lose than what we gain. Losing both Dun and Murph would be great... but losing J-Rich would be hard to swallow. Also, we wouldn't get cap space to re-sign our young players... so, no, thanks. Next.

TMC wrote:Intriguing trade, but more for what we lose than what we gain. Losing both Dun and Murph would be great... but losing J-Rich would be hard to swallow. Also, we wouldn't get cap space to re-sign our young players... so, no, thanks. Next.

That's it! Jermaine is real good but the other two coming in are average and not getting salary space makes it all useless.

The players we have here will do but two or three (Foyle, dun and Murphy) need to go to resign the players that are the future