+1 to close and open a new issue. I like Sanjiva's suggestion that this be
documented in the primer.
Jean-Jacques.
Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> A more accurate way to state my understanding is that the
> issue-operation-overloading is closed by removing the feature, and a new
> issue has arisen:
>
> issue-transition-documentation: Do we need to provide user
> documentation describing the transition between WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 1.2?
> If so, what form should such documentation take? The removal of
> operation overloading and advice on how to restructure a WSDL 1.1 file
> that relies on this feature are an example.