Pages

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Belloc on Henry VIII's First Two Wives

Tomorrow (a little after 6:45 a.m. Central/7:45 a.m. Eastern) on the Son Rise Morning Show, Anna Mitchell and I will continue our discussion of Hilaire Belloc's Characters of the Reformation, looking at Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn, Henry VIII's first two wives.

One of the most interesting aspects of his analysis of Catherine of Aragon is that Belloc rejects the usual explanation of Henry VIII wanting to have his marriage to Catherine annulled so that he could marry Anne Boleyn--the desire for a legitimate male heir:

Now here arises an important point. To what extent was Henry influenced in the abominable thing he did by the desire for an heir? Did his wronging of Catherine have any excuse in his disappointment at having only a daughter to succeed him?

The white-washers of Henry and the defenders of the great tragedy of the Reformation have argued with all their weight on that side. They have pretended in different degrees of sincerity that Catherine's ill success in providing him with an heir is the root of the affair. Not one who reads the contemporary documents of the time can believe that.

The root of the affair was Henry's miserable infatuation with Anne Boleyn. But the first duty of the historian is to be just; and we must allow a certain weight to Henry's desire for a male heir. These things cannot be put in exact proportion or percentages, but if one attempts to put it thus and give the disappointment at the lack of an heir from one fifth to one quarter of his motive, one may perhaps roughly represent the weight which it bore.

He was somewhat worried by not having a male heir because his throne was not too stable; his father had been a usurper and only captured the throne twenty-four years before his son's accession. It was in its way important to leave a son to carry on the dynasty; on the other hand the greatest thrones in Europe were handed on through women— Spain itself was a splendid example — and the little Princess Mary was so popular with everyone and would have
been so thoroughly supported that there was no real danger.

Put forward as the main excuse for the divorce, the
pretence that the necessity for a male heir was the leading
motive was falsehood and hypocrisy.
When it was clear that Catherine could bear no more
children, Henry gradually deserted her. He had several
affairs ; he took up with a woman whom he had known in
boyhood — one Blount — and had a son by her whom he
called the Duke of Richmond. He also took up with the
daughter of a courtier and diplomat of his called Boleyn,
a young lady of the name of Mary, and when he was tired
of her he married her off to one of his other courtiers with
a portion which did no credit to his generosity.

He probably ceased to live with his wife as early as 1521,
when he was no more than thirty, and she, poor woman,
still under thirty-seven. Even by his own admission (and
he was a great liar) he ceased to live with her within the
next three or four years.

And then Anne Boleyn shows up in 1522 and Belloc also has a different view of Anne's influence on Henry VIII's actions:

Anne, then, was neither the cause nor the inspirer of the first movement away from Catholicism. But she is what I have called her, the pivot figure. It is because she was what she was, and did what she did, that England is what England is to-day.

It is, therefore, of the first importance to history to under- stand what this woman really was and the real place of her action in the whole scheme of the time. From her day to our own it has been taken for granted by all national tradition and by every historian that she lay at the origins of the English Reformation, but latterly there has arisen
an effort to weaken or question this sound tradition and to
explain in other ways the quarrel between Henry and Rome
and the ultimate effect of it. This effort at supplanting
true history by false is part of the general scepticism of our
time, which is usually ready to accept anything new because
new falsehoods sound more picturesque as a rule than well-
worn truths. But there is here a more powerful motive,
to make the origins of the change of religion in England
look a littie less ignoble than they really are. That is why
Professor Pollard, for instance, who is the chief authority
on the details of the period in England, tries to maintain
the fantastic theory that Henry's attempt to get rid of his
wife was not connected with Anne Boleyn, but with larger
reasons of State, and that he had had the policy of getting
rid of Catherine of Aragon in mind for many years before
he met Anne Boleyn. The idea is not only fantastic, but
desperate; it has no chance of being accepted out of
England, and I do not think it will be accepted even in
England save by those who are very hard up for material
in the whitewashing of Henry VIII's character.

No, Anne remains and will always remain at the origins
of dire catastrophe. It behooves us therefore to understand
her and her effect as best we can.
Anne Boleyn was a Howard. That is the first thing to
grasp in connection with her, and it is all the more important to grasp it because historians have failed to stress as
strongly as they should have stressed this capital feature in
her position. She was a Howard through her mother, who
was the daughter of that old Duke of Norfolk, the victor of
Flodden, and who was the sister of his son Thomas, third
Duke of Norfolk, who played a great part throughout the
whole of Henry VIII's reign.

The Howards were semi-royal. . . .

And then Belloc comes to the Great Matter and Henry's intentions:

We have no documents; we can only judge by the nature of the case and by what followed. But it is fairly clear that some time before, or in the very early part of 1525, when Henry was thirty-four years of age, and Anne well over twenty, perhaps as much as twenty-three, there was some arrangement between them, and that Anne had already
given Henry to understand that she would not be his
mistress, but would envisage marriage if he could get rid
of Catherine. In that year her father was raised to the
peerage and given a new and more prominent position, and
in that year we have also large gifts from Henry to Anne,
and Henry interfering with her movements and saying
where she is to stop.

It does not follow that Henry had thus early accepted
the idea of marrying Anne. He probably still thought she
would become his mistress at last. To attempt the repudia-
tion of Catherine, the niece of the Emperor of Germany
and the King of Spain, the most prominent woman in the
greatest family in Europe, would be a very serious business
indeed, and Henry's hesitating and uncertain character
would hardly come to a decision at once in the matter. . . .

2 comments:

Not true! When Henry VIII married Jane Seymour, both Catherine and Anne were dead: that was a valid marriage. The Church would have recognized that marriage and welcomed Henry back IF he would have repented and asked to return to the fold!

SUPREMACY AND SURVIVAL

Face-off on the Cover: Henry VIII and Blessed John Henry Newman

Welcome to My Blog

The purpose of this blog is for me to publish not-quite-daily updates on my continuing research on the English Reformation and its aftermath, especially for Catholics until Emancipation in 1829; I'll particularly highlight the stories of the Catholic Martyrs of England and Wales, especially those beatified and canonized by the Holy See. I will also highlight promotional events for Supremacy and Survival: How Catholics Endured the English Reformation.

If you like my blog, you might like my book, available from these retailers, on Kindle, and Nook! [If you want a signed copy, please contact me via email: englishreform(at)cox(dot)net].

Comment moderation is turned on; since I am not a full-time writer/blogger but have a full-time job outside the home please be patient with me logging in to approve comments. Unsigned Anonymous comments will not be published.

Speakers Bureau

I am a member of the Speakers Bureau for the Diocese of Wichita. Please see my profile here, including a list of topics and sample presentations.

Copyright Notice

Copyright 2010-2017 by Stephanie A. Mann

Note about Pictures, Illustrations, and Links

The pictures and illustrations from other sources on my blog are in the public domain as far as I am able to ascertain. When I post photographs that I have taken, my common copyright to them is asserted. Please do not post on other sites without my express permission.

When I link to another blog or website, please understand that it does not necessarily mean that I recommend or agree with everything on that blog or website. Finally, please remember that links may not always work because pages move or expire on other websites. Thank you.