If someone were to make that into a ad for American TV, it would be social/political dynamite. You'd have the entire Conservative voting bloc on your side.

I'm serious, a lot of Conservatives are sick and tired of namby pamby, statist, global trade worshiping Republicanism and their bland candidates that really stand for nothing being stuff down their throats.

You see that need for speaking truth to power when someone like Donald Trump goes on a tear and rips both parties for letting China rip us off on trade policy and costing us millions of jobs. People instantly and positively respond to it.

Was on a march in Warsaw on Poland's independence day (November 11) last year, expressing similar sentiments.

Naturally, before the march ultra-leftists decried the marchers as "fascists", warning that there'll be swastikas etc. Busloads of violent "Antifa" anarchists from Germany even turned up!

When it became clear that no Nazis or Nazi symbols were actually present (but quite a few combatants from the Warsaw Rising against the Nazis), the leftist media changed their tune and claimed that the march was full of hooligans wanting a fight.

Well, here is the march of "fascists" and "violent hooligans" in full :) Media said there were around 5,000 of us. I estimate around 30,000. Others even 50,000.

On second thoughts - while I'm broadly in agreement with Generation Identitaire's complaints and frustrations with the "May 68" generation, why the need for the "declaration of war"?

Do they even know what they're talking about?! If they want a real war, then they can always go to Syria. Otherwise, especially after Breivik, why give leftists added ammunition by using such language??

" wonder how long they will last until they cave in, or the system destroys them in favor of Muslim peace?" they'll last a lot longer than you with an attitude like that. Defeat is in the past . We should be encouraging them and uniting with them not trying to pour cold water on teh fire. And green infidel F18k leftist's , their opionions and their plans , they are not on our side anything they disapprove off is good. You don't win by lying down, or asking a group that has activly sought to wipe us out if it's ok to fight back.

The best way to defeat the enemies of western conservatism is... to state an obvious and (yet) ignored fact. Our "liberals" in reality act as apologetics for conservative islam and non-white nationalists.

This is ideological/psychological war, we can't win if we play the game with their own rules "conservatives vs liberals"... the situation is much more complex than that.

The far-right in middle-east (Hamas, Hezbollah) is supported from the european far-left (ANTIFA, Indymedia), don't forget that...

Don't call our enemies "liberals", "lefties"... you only will fuel their agenda. Call them with their real names- "useful idiots" or "apologetics for non-white conservatives"

I've been anticipating this sort of thing for over a decade now. The long awaited revival of Western consciousness. The long awaited dawning of a new generation that recognizes that the Leftist filth of the "progressive era" are genocidal traitors.

In the home of Charles the Hammer, we see a new sun arising on the doorstep of civilization.

We must accept the fact that the US establishment as it now stands is against this unfolding salvation. We must decide where our loyalties will lie in the future.

Green Infidel, some of us have lost our fear of the Leftist media machine... when has appeasing them with politeness ever made a difference?

What they fear MOST OF ALL are words like these. What they fear MOST OF ALL is militant resistance from a white majority that has every advantage imaginable against their tenuous hold on power. What they fear MOST OF ALL is having to do the sorts of things that they will have to do to surpress this resistance... because our apathy allows them a facade of morality.

I agree with your reasoning regarding the need to avoid giving ammunition to the left.

Then again, it's the truth, we are in a war, a cultural ideological and sometimes generational war against our own leaders elites, and leftist groups and the path they have taken us along, including mass immigration.

Perhaps care needs to be taken to emphasise these aspect of the struggle,rather than letting others eg the left demonise and undermine the movement as they will surely attempt to do.

The name of this group is very evocative and has the potential of worldwide appeal for all those who value freedom and western or european ideals rather than middle eastern or islamic tyranny, including people of all colours and ethnicity who identify more with the civilised western world

"leftist's , their opionions and their plans , they are not on our side""You don't win by lying down"

All true, Rob - but do you win by alienating the "middle 80%" of a population either? They probably want jobs, peace and security more than "a declaration of war", and so are not represented by "generation identitaire". And although those 80% may well also have deep suspicions about immigration, the leftists can use such violent rhetoric as evidence that the likes of the angry young men in the video here are "dangerous", even "fascist". And the middle 80% won't even feel the need to spend time digging into the details.

The leftists know how to play this game of propaganda perfectly. And we need to deal with it. NOT play into their hands...

Well,I´m very curious for their programmatic follwo up. I´d be very surprised if these jeunes have managed a critique that´s in anyway coherent and thoughtful I really don´t like the scowling faces, as I can just a well imagine antifa-thugs looking at me like that, or Occupiers, and I don´t like the generational anger at all.Wasn´t that exactly what their parents used to look like? Half of the western population has been silenced and exploited, so the people these kids are adressing would be allies, not enemies

To me this trait is simply an example of the divide and conquer-approach employed by the mainstream dor the last forty years in order to keep the proles apart, seething and clueless.

So I´ll reserve judgement, and I´ll wait.

For now I feel quite a bit of outrage at the bullying tone of the jeunes..I haven´t seen any jeunes saying anything close to what we say, and to what we seem to think they are saying. I´ve seen jeunes exactly like them wearing Che Guevara berets, desert boots and swamp beards for nigh on thirty years now. Can´t imagine the contents have changed all of a sudden.

But they don't alienate them! They lure them with nice smiles, and sell them nice food - and only a "tiny minority" show their less-nice side when they need to let someone know who's boss.

Meanwhile "Generation Identitaire" are potentially provoking whole swathes of society with their talk of a "declaration of war". They could have instead called it something more cryptic, like a "call to action". Making too many enemies when you're small is not a good idea. All I'm saying.

What leftists fear most are hard-hitting arguments. Not "violent" appeals to emotion, such as "a declaration of war"... plenty of words like these have come out from Breivik, and also the likes of the EDL... what have they done, except for giving the Left a big "fascist" bogeyman to scare people with?

@Dinan

Agree that the name of the group, and its allusions to youth and against the "'68 generation" resonates, and has large potential. Especially if things really kick off against the Religion of Peace (as surely they will, sooner or later)

@Balkaner

Yes, leftists is not a perfect word. Perhaps intellectual laziness on my part, as many genuine left-wingers are NOT happy with the continuous acting "offended", calls for censorship, shouting down people as fascists etc. (apologies to any "offended" anti-Islamic leftists out there!) But what better word to use, given it's leftists, often supported by the KGB, who've been employing these methods in Europe/USA for the past 50 years?! And "leftist" is shorter, and easier to say in a conversation than "useful idiot" :)

Heart warming and inspiring. This should, no, MUST be the rallying cry of the West!

Shine enough truth on political correctness and it reveals itself the house of cards it really is. Although a lie can run half way accross the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes, if you push a determined people against the wall, you don't get pulp, but rather a crack on the wall.

We freethinking people are made of something else. We may look soft on the outside, but our inniards ane not pudding. We intend to defend our birthright and take the political battle to where it belongs. The elites may ignore us for a living as they may ignore reality. But Ayn Rand did teach us that you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. Well, some of us at least.

This is the only form of protest that matters: NUMBERS. Showing the elites (we don’t even call them leaders anymore, do we?) that they are NOT in charge and when the level of social upheaval they are responsible for is just around the corner, they finally get a taste of just how NOT in charge of anything they really are. Throwing more money at failed projects is their way of admiting they lost it. There is a line they must not cross and they have become generous with what doesn’t belong to them: our freedom. They were elected to be its custodians and are not allowed to abolish it. That message will be driven home, one way or the other!

It’s like they are playing this poker game with barbarians; the Left elites keep losing and upping the ante: they threw the kitchen sink, the cat-in-the-hat, the geese with the golden eggs and the gift that keeps on giving, you name it. Now they are reaching for our checkbooks and paying with our freedom and identity for the chimeric Peace of accommodation. Like junkies, they cannot admit they became addicted and imagine against all logic that “next time will be different”. But after a while the accommodation becomes the purpose. And that’s when they finally wake up to the fact that there is in effect nothing left to trade.

Numbers reach the ears of politicians and actually penetrate them. Not violence (cf Hussein O’s reaction to the murder of an American embassador), not the releasing of doves and/or baloons for Peace(TM), not the preening self righeousness of bumber stickers and T-shirts. This is instead the abdication of thought or arguments and letting someone else do the "thinking" and the humour on your behalf.

Out here in the (once) Great Brittain, a former "glamour model" Jordan is lending her face to the campaign "wear Jeans / save lives". Innaction as a mission. Brilliant! If it was this easy, doctors the world over would swap their hospital gowns for denim, but such is not forthcoming.Those are the "causes" for the lazy, the indolent, the pointless and the self-righeous who think that trolling the witticisms or platitudes of someone else is the equivalent of (or that it even qualifies as) a struggle.

To unite a people you need an identity. You cannot unite through “diversity” in and of itself, but diverse people (read “diverse of opinion”, the only diversity that matters) will naturally come together when they have a common goal. Diversity as a purpose is only good at dividing, at generating injustice, social instability and hardship. It negates the social compass that any healthy society needs, because to know where we are going as a Civilization, we must first know who we are and where we came from. By pretending there’s no Us or Them, the most fundamental difference between Barbarism and Civilization has already disappeared. It’s not the job of the elites to tell our History and Culture what they are. There’s a reason why Nations are built and Peoples created; these are the result of heritage, identity, values and traditions that are important to this group rather than that group, and occur in this part of the World and not on that other.

There was some reference above to the white majority. Time is running out very fast for us. White minorities in the USA by 2040, Britain by 2066 and I read that in France 50% of the population will be black or muslim by 2050. Similar figures probably for Holland and Scandinavia.

There is, however, a possible unexpected development in the battle between the Christian West and Islam. Behind closed doors debate is taking place on the successor to the hopelessly wet Rowan Williams as Archbishop of Canterbury and leader of the world-wide Anglican communion.

The possible front-runner is the first black Archbishop of York the Ugandan John Sentanu. He was the Chief Justice in Uganda at the time of Idi Amin. Amin forced all Ugandans to become muslims and yet here is a possible leader of all Anglicans who has faced him down.

Sentanu is a devout Christian who has stood up against a muslim dictator. Sometimes we need to step outside the white world to find people with the courage and experience to deal with the enemies of white Christendom.The Marxists will have a bit of a problem with Sentanu without falling foul of their own anti-racism agenda.

Green Infidel said... "What leftists fear most are hard-hitting arguments. Not "violent" appeals to emotion, such as "a declaration of war"... plenty of words like these have come out from Breivik, and also the likes of the EDL... what have they done, except for giving the Left a big "fascist" bogeyman to scare people with?"

So, in other words, you favor the status quo as it now stands? And we'll just go quietly and passively into the night. We'll lose our civilization, but at least we'll know we're better than the barbarians who exterminated us.

And if you think Leftists fear "hard hitting arguments", you really, really are naive. The irrational don't fear reality. They ignore it. The "Truth" after all, has nothing to do with what they want.

You mistake me anyway. Reread my post. We don't get violent. We force them to get violent first. Then we defend ourselves.

So WHY is there this status quo? Nationalist groups have existed in France, Britain and other places for over 50 years. And have had plenty of youth in them... So why is this status quo still existing? Maybe because the majority prefer the thought of a career or hip-hop, eating kebabs, multiple relationships etc to joining "boneheads" and "losers"? And yeah - those so disgruntled with what's happening, but backing up their words of a "declaration of war" with actions such as "spraying graffiti" will be seen as exactly that: losers.

If we are EVER to change the status quo then we need to connect with the mainstream and get more people to our side. Enough people that we don't get swamped by "anti-fascists" or Islamists at every opportunity. The only way to do that (without compromising our principles) is to get our message across effecively. To make ourselves both visible and striking a chord with people. Which is something that the likes of Winston Churchill, Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, Allen West and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff have managed to do. But not what phrases such as a "declaration of war", from fresh faces who don't have a clue about the meaning of those words, can ever accomplish...

Green Infidel, the lefties use emotional based propagandas, they don't use reason, they don't use stats.

"Be militant", for me is to participate in nationalist black blocks, promote with graffiti our cause and publish personal information of dangerous left-nutters, we need the support of the young people... They are the future, not us.

You said "the lefties and islamists feed the poor, take care for homeless children". Well... radical nationalist movements like "Opir" (from Ukraine) also do such things. I hope that "GI" from France is in favour of social work.

Only with reason and social work we can get the support of the majority. Not with being "nice" or playing the games of the lefties

Spot on Jonny, leftards don't fearrational argument, they totally ignore it. Lefties suffer from adistortion in the way they deal with reality. This distortion must occurearly on in life, when faced with atough decision the lefty chooses the cowards way out, and the dye is then set for their entire lives. The problems occur when too many of these fantacists get into positions of influence.

Green infidel: unless you are a political party alienating the 80% should not really be of a concern. In England the edl have been trying very hard to win over "middle England" for a while now. Although middle England may sympathise, they aren't going to do anything. They are laden with debt, mortgages, bills and jobs which they will lose if found out to be supporting "fascists".

Speaking from a u.k point of view its more of a class divide rather than a generational one I feel. majority of those that voice their concerns are the working class, those that experience first hand what the failed states policies are doing. The middle classes are largely insulated even in the cities by living in leafier surburbs.

However I have noticed one aspect of the generational trend that i believe is unique to the uk (solely opinion). I believe the peak of opposition comes largely in those aged roughly 25-35. With perhaps Lower numbers 5years either side.. As someone who is 26,(and belongs to The 80% mortgage, debt ridden, tired, ill, slave to the work machine) I feel we are the generation of discontent.

We are the generation that largely rejects the socialist generation of our parents, the multicultural hogwash of our youth, and admire our grandparents (ww2) generation. We were not the generation to push socialism, nor have we been utterly brainwashed by the state as the young have during their school years. We have felt the changes, but only caught the latter end of a pc country gone mad.

What highlighted this to me the most was during London riots (I feel this event was significant in many ways). The looters ( of all races) were largely under 20. The Enfield lads were largely late 20s early 30s.

To sum up we are the generation that was sold a lie, told you can be anything you want to be, told what you can and can't say anymore, we are doped up on prescription drugs just to get us through the day, breaking our backs and lives bound by a 40 year mortgage that even if paid off your kids will be taxed on it if you die, bills, taxes, cost of living etc. So for that 80% to physically do anything (includes myself) is unlikely, unless we are pushed too far. In the meantime we voice our discontent through voting, mutter under our breath in the street, talk frankly amongst friends and express our true feelings online

The fear of violence from blacks/browns in the US pushed it wide, and the new fear of violence from the majority whites is on the way (with a side of Islam vs Christianity).

Violent black and brown youth are the revolutionary vanguard with legitimate greivances. Violent white youth will be depicted as white supremacist fascists...instead of having legitimate greivances to be appeased.

Just the way it is. It is going to be tough to take back our nations and civilization. The Left (and Islam) isnt interested in living up to principles and values. They are interested in smashing the traditional European Christian order and replacing it with Utopian Visions.

We have to keep on talking about these issues, to spread articulate language and analysis wider and wider in the population. You have to be able to defend the agenda without scaring people, to usurp legitimacy in the face of an extremely hostile Establishment.

One useful endeavor is to study the Left of the last century or so going back to Gramsci, but also the myriad of identity politics and special interest groups of the New Left, even the more radical operational groups like the Black Panthers. There is a lot to learn as far as what tactics work and organizational and funding strategies, entryism, protests, sit ins, demands for recognition(legitmacy) for European identity groups in the Universities for example, pushed via sit ins, and then redress of greivances.

Only with reason and social work we can get the support of the majority.

A VERY important point. Check out Hamas, Hezbollah and the rest. It's exactly how they won the support of "the people"...

You say "publish personal information of dangerous left-nutters". Been there, done that... This happened recently in Poland - when nationalists published details of far-left activists. The media just took this as proof of the danger of - you've guessed it - fascism!

No - leftards have networks ready to protect them. Besides, the hardcore ones live in squats anyway, so one will never know their "official" address... they don't have one!

No- the method has to be different. We need to make our message attractive to more people. And get them to see any accusations of "fascism" as the propaganda they are. Which means getting our message out, and getting it right. Be active - especially at universities. For any confrontations (which there'll inevitably be), have cameras ready. And be ready to hold debates and discussions, as well as standoffs with the more aggressive leftists/Islamists on campus.

And we need to be careful not to copy the dirtier parts of leftists' tactics, such as publishing addresses etc. They have the media behind them - so they can easily turn this against us...

"unless you are a political party alienating the 80% should not really be of a concern. In England the edl have been trying very hard to win over "middle England" for a while now."

The EDL is a great example of the point I was trying to make - how exactly are they seen by the middle 80%? As nice? Honourable? Fighting the good fight? Or fascist? Well, such is the popular attitude that leftists can throw bricks at them, with no police response, and ordinary people don't care. Papers don't even talk about it, without a murmur of dissent from their readers.

So - honourable as their fight may be - are they being successful in winning over the masses? The moral of their story seems to be: It's not how correct your message is that matters. It's how people see it... And right now, people see the EDL as being almost like the BNP.

I'm only 4 years older, and I know exactly how you feel. But is there much to be gained from "discontent" and "anger" alone? It's on such a wave of anger that Hitler came to power - and set his country on a path to destruction - of itself. Come to think of it, where did anger get people in years gone by? For example, the miners during the 80s' strikes? They mostly ended-up unemployed, and largely powerless...

I used to share your optimism about our generation rejecting "multicultural hogwash" - but looking at my old schoolmates' facebook posts brought me back down to reality. It's not that they love multiculturalism. It's that they don't care about it... Are the posts from your friends different?

If not - then will such anger win them over? Anger is seen as being employed by the desperate. The desperate are seen to be those losing the battle. And the public don't like those who lose. Instead, they like powerful messages, delivered by people they respect...

As Osama bin Laden once said: "If people have the choice between a strong horse and a weak horse, they will choose the strong horse."

We need to present ourselves as the strong horse. Not the angry and discontented one.

@14, obviously you didn't understand the video. The notion that the west needs to share itself with all ethnicities and races (especially browns and blacks) is antithetical to the video, and you your comment is therefore bizarre. Watch the video again!