Follow us

:( Oops! Something went wrong...

Blog

blog

Media

media

Events

events

Scholars

publications / reports / 2013

Measured or Makeshift? Parliamentary Scrutiny of the European Union

Share this

In this 2013 pamphlet, leading politicians, commentators and academics set out growing concerns that parliamentary scrutiny of EU business at Westminster was inadequate, questioned whether there was a democratic deficit at the heart of the UK’s relationship with the EU, and canvassed ideas for reform of Parliament’s EU engagement.

Download the publication

Measured or Makeshift – Parliamentary scrutiny of the European Union comprises a series of essays from leading politicians and experts, exploring how the system for Parliament’s engagement with the EU could be improved to address the democratic deficit and ensure that Parliament is more effective and influential in its scrutiny of European issues.

The collection raised challenging questions including:

Do parliamentarians want to be better informed, to shape decisions or to make the government change its mind?

Should Parliament’s intervention in EU business take place at an earlier, more strategic, stage?

Should parliamentarians seek to influence the development of policy and provide an early warning system for government, as well as holding it to account at a later stage?

How do other parliaments scrutinise European issues, and are there lessons for the UK?

The essays evidenced a common desire to ‘mainstream’ European issues across Parliament, making a range of suggestions including:

Changes to departmental question time sessions

Greater involvement by departmental select committees

Giving MPs more decisive influence through votes that bind government action

Greater direct engagement between MPs and MEPs and with EU institutions as a whole

‘A common thread running through the pamphlet is that the House of Lords scrutiny model is better than that in the House of Commons. Too few MPs have a real understanding of how the EU works and many more of them need to engage more actively with the detail. Our membership of the EU affects almost every aspect of national life, but too many MPs deal in broad populist headlines rather than engaging actively with the details of policy and legislation emerging from Brussels. The ideas for reform outlined in the pamphlet are neither pro-European or anti-European – providing effective scrutiny of policy and laws is important whatever side of the debate you stand.’

Table of contents

Foreword Rt Hon David Lidington MP, Minister of State for Europe

Introduction Dr Ruth Fox, Director, Hansard Society

Is it time to reconstruct the European scrutiny system in the House of Commons? Bill Cash MP, Chair, European Scrutiny Committee, House of Commons

Effective House of Lords scrutiny of the European Union Lord Boswell, Chair, European Union Committee, House of Lords

The politics of European scrutiny Gisela Stuart MP

What does putting Parliament back in control entail? Christopher Howarth, Open Europe

Improving Commons scrutiny of the EU - while we work on a new UK-EU relationship Chris Heaton-Harris MP and Robert Broadhurst

Parliamentary scrutiny of Europe: what lessons from our neighbours? Dr Ariella Huff and Dr Julie Smith, University of Cambridge

Latest

blog / 04.09.19

Parliament and the Declaration of War in September 1939

3 September marked the 80th anniversary of the UK’s declaration of war on Nazi Germany. As the House of Commons again engages in tumultuous and historic proceedings, Professor Stuart Ball recounts the debates in the Chamber in the two preceding days that helped to precipitate the declaration.

‘Erskine May’, the authoritative guide to Parliament’s procedures and practice, went online on 2 July. The move has significant implications for democratic transparency and for Parliament’s interaction with the public. Here, one of the editors of the new edition, Clerk of the Journals Mark Hutton, explains why and how the innovation came about.

Power of the Purse: what is the Estimates process and how does it work?

Some backbench MPs are seeking to use House of Commons approval of the government’s Main Estimates for 2019-20 as a vehicle against a ‘no-deal’ Brexit, meaning the process is attracting greater interest than usual. We set out how the Estimates process works, how it has changed over the years, and how it could be improved in the future.

The increased stature of select committees and their chairs: reflections by Harriet Harman MP

On the 40th anniversary of the creation of departmental select committees, Harriet Harman, the longest continuously-serving woman MP, offers some personal reflections on the growing importance of select committees and their chairs, particularly at a time of considerable political instability.