<quoted text>Off topic and completely irrelevant! Only a low life A-hole would use another's profile name! Grow up,or at least try to! And if you're only a 12 year old like I suspect never mind,I'll talk to your mom about her douche bag of a son and what he is up to! Do you like to watch? Are you a voyeur? Move along now sonny,the adults are trying to have a relevant conversation!

<quoted text>Off topic and completely irrelevant! Only a low life A-hole would use another's profile name! Grow up,or at least try to! And if you're only a 12 year old like I suspect never mind,I'll talk to your mom about her douche bag of a son and what he is up to! Do you like to watch? Are you a voyeur? Move along now sonny,the adults are trying to have a relevant conversation!

If you are a little boy, FAT king will be MORE THAN HAPPY to meet you and BLOW YOU. Make sure he realizes you are a little boy. Or else he'll think you are just f*cking with him like many people do on Topix because he "stamps his wittle feetzies" and it is so much fun to WATCH!!

I remember the night I bailed you out of jail.What made you steal a ladder and do that to a horse?You are one sick freak!

the fact king wrote:

<quoted text>Had to change your name AGAIN didn't ya sharon......Whats a matter they ban you AGAIN.....if you would quit talking about how much you & your son LOVE donkey c*cks MAYBE they would quit banning ya........JUST A THOUGHT LOSER.......

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;An apple tree bearing fruit.An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

And STILL, no logical response.

Just look at the gay twirl ad homoan attacks above.

A desperate attempt to stop light that is kicking the sh/t out of darkness!

Oh, and proving that the biggest blondes live in Texas! And there ain't nothing but steers and queers in Texas. There ain't no horns on me, maybe I should go

8.If you pretend duplicating sexuality is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

Rev Ken; Any so-called duplication of sexuality stereotypically ignores the basis for relationship which is specific to the individuals as consenting adults.

KiMare'a wrote; It is interesting that you generalize the meaning of 'sexuality' and 'relationship' to a meaningless opinion of anyone. The only thing it does is expose the duplicity of your argument...

The fact of the matter is, the range of masculine to feminine sexuality has been distinguished by social scientists with at least two hundred specific characteristics. Those differences are so vast, marriage has been portrayed as the union of Mars and Venus.

What you ignore is that evolution fundamentally operates on the basis of mutation. Some mutations enable survival, others are defective dead ends. There is no morality in that difference, it is simply a biological reality. GLBT's exist at the crossover point of masculinity and femininity holding about 4% of the population. That is an incredibly narrow position to not qualify for duplication. Especially when you remove bisexuals and transsexuals who readily admit a biological sexuality confusion.

Nor do I ignore the basis of any relationship. I rightly distinguish between relationships. As noted before, so does the law. It is why we have gender, age, relationship and number requirements regarding marriage.

You make the incredibly silly assertion that 'consenting adults' can define their relationship any way they want and society has to acquiesce to it.

Not trying to be crude, but by mentioning 'consent', you simply expose the inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning expression of sexuality at the most intimate physical level, a gay couple is the union of Uranus and Uranus. Hardly a comparison with the complimentary design of a male and female sexual union.

You make the incredibly silly assertion that 'consenting adults' can define their relationship any way they want and society has to acquiesce to it.Not trying to be crude, but by mentioning 'consent', you simply expose the inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning expression of sexuality at the most intimate physical level, a gay couple is the union of Uranus and Uranus. Hardly a comparison with the complimentary design of a male and female sexual union.

Society has accepted gay marriage. In several years, this will be a non issue. In several years, you'll still be an irrelevant screaming troll. Again, you attempt to reduce SSM to anal sex, Kuntmary.

<quoted text>Society has accepted gay marriage. In several years, this will be a non issue. In several years, you'll still be an irrelevant screaming troll. Again, you attempt to reduce SSM to anal sex, Kuntmary.I'm your smell mangina and I approve this message.

1. Society has not accepted gay 'marriage'.

2. I did not reduce ss'M' to anal sex, you reduced marriage to a friendship.

3. I pointed out the difference between natural sex and inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning sex.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.