I suspect that it will become a form of battery-backup, but it doesn't yet sound compelling as a primary powersource for anything high-power... and a lot of medium-power stuff too. If my math is right, then their 1 gram example would produce around 0.173611...e-3 watts if used in a continuous mode. The PIC10LF320/322 has numbers like 0.000036e-3 watts (sleep) to 0.025e-3 watts (at 1 MHz) consumption, so this could be used pretty directly, but for e.g. a rover, we find that the Sojourner (https://mars.nasa.gov/MPF/rover/descrip.html) used around 10 watts to move: roughly 50,000 times as much. You could just increase the amount that you use, but Sojourner only weighed 11,500 grams itself, so you wouldn't even equal the production of Sojourner's solar cells, which could peak-out around 15 watts.

I was thinking rovers further out, like on the moons of the gas giants or Ceres. Places where solar power won't give you enough. At the very least such a power source might be useful for tiding systems over during night periods.

_________________If every cloud had a silver lining, there would be a lot more plane crashes.

Sat Jul 01, 2017 5:33 pm

Mjolnir

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:24 amPosts: 392

Re: The Physics News Thread

A 1 g rechargeable lithium ion battery would be capable of the same output for around a month (self discharge aside). Even a supercapacitor should be able to manage a few days. High energy density/low power density power supplies can have some uses in spacecraft, but this one's a bit too low in power density.

I really don't see it being useful for any sort of ion thrusters. Those are quite power hungry, and you'd probably get more delta-v from a 1 g solar sail than such a system would provide over its operational lifetime. You might be able to use a beta emitter to directly produce the high voltages for a FEEP...you'd just want something with a shorter half-life than C-14.

Some medical implants can use such low levels of power. Or things like wireless sensors scattered throughout a building or other large structure where wired power would be inconvenient/failure prone and there's no light for photovoltaics. These might see use on a spacecraft, but not as any part of its overall power systems.

CRISPR is a breakthrough technique that makes gene-editing quick and inexpensive to use.

Eugenics war countdown: 3-2-1...

Yes I am a Star Trek fan to.

Eugenics? What? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EugenicsThat is precisely opposite of genetics. Also. In canon (old canon, 1960's-1990's) TV Star Trek, it took centuries and a secret Asian cabal to create Khan. Why so long? Because they were BREEDING people to get Khan. Not genetically altering.

Also. If you fucking read the article about CRISPR you would see that CRISPR is an Outside Context Problem for us. Why? Because in fifty or so years, once CRISPR is perfectly understood, someone could make a retrovirus plasmid plague with CRISPR with which they could change ANYONE in a Superman like Khan..minus the arrogance and egoism. CRISPR is a game changer on par with fire. It completely rewrites how the future will be like because..unlike now in obsolete dystopian fiction..we could give everyone an ideal human body with it.

Genetics is not the precise opposite of Eugenics. And even if it wasn't a parallel, depending on which definition you use, it's not even a concept that can be boiled down into a dichotomy to begin with. Frederick Osborn originally proposed it as a philosophy that is subject to advances in science and technology.

Also. This is not a work of fiction, and literary tropes are not being used to propel a narrative. Once CRISPR is fully understood, it wouldn't be an Outside Context Problem anymore, because we would then understand the context.

Successful traits are dependent on the environment the life-form is inhabiting, all genetic traits come with an opportunity cost, and therefore it is impossible to have a single perfect life form that is superior in all environments. CRISPR has the potential to do a lot of things, helpful and harmful.

It always seemed to me that when the villain in The Incredibles said the noteworthy line "when everyone is super, no one will be," it was done to illustrate the depths of his madness. Maybe it makes sense when one is an Objectivist, with a captial O, but in reality, people don't need to compare themselves to others in order to establish self-worth and capability. Comparing a condition to its opposite is not required to define and measure the condition.

Excitonium was hypothesized 50 years ago, but it hasn't been supported by experiment until now. If I understand the provided material correctly, it involves a substance where electrons end up pairing with empty spaces in the material's valence bands as though those spaces were particles.

CRISPR is a breakthrough technique that makes gene-editing quick and inexpensive to use.

Eugenics war countdown: 3-2-1...

Yes I am a Star Trek fan to.

Sadly such a war can only be won either by doing a better job of it yourself or take a hardline stance as they do n Star Trek. Sadly, doing THAT WILL and probably have going to bite them. Basically if someone are producing superhumans then they WILL take over unless you violently stop them OR make your own to match them. Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ in the world and they DOMINATE media, banking & science (they earn Nobel prizes like candy). If someone can, using artificial means, match AND surpass that they will dominate.

Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:36 am

Sweforce

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:00 pmPosts: 357

Re: The Science & Technology News Thread

Arioch wrote:

Blowing things up is the best science.

Considering my World of Warcraft days, any goblin engineer will agree with you.

Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:39 am

Sweforce

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:00 pmPosts: 357

Re: The Science & Technology News Thread

Diodri wrote:

Very nice. I hope we eventually get some transparent aluminum for our smartphone screens so we stop breaking them!

I guess we could make super strong covers today but they need to function as touch screens as well.