Dear Peter
as an editorial ammendment concerning these URI references, I suggest the
following note at the end of section 6.4 RDF URI References
[[
Note: Because of the risk of confusion between RDF URI references that would
be equivalent if derefenced, the use of %-escaped characters in RDF URI
references is strongly discouraged, see also
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#URIEquivalence-15">
URI equivalence issue</a> of
the Technical Architecture Group [TAG]
]]
Where [TAG] links to a new informative reference of the TAG issue list.
The body of the text is copied from
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-xml-names11-20031105/#IRIComparison
Please reply, cc to www-rdf-comments, indiciating if you would be satisifed
with such a change.
thanks
Jeremy