So something has made it around the sun, but is now on a different path?

I hope not. If the orbit changed significantly, that would mean it lost too much mass and thus all we are seeing is dispersing rubble. If what
emerged is in the same basic orbit, then the comet was massive enough and cohesive enough to survive, and therefor might still put on a show.

during the rush too control,, there is one , image out there somewhere ,,which shows a perfect sphere,, which was called a bad pixel,, ,, but a
perfect sphere inner core would make , logical sence,, in the vacumn of "outer-space",,

maybe that is what they don't want too accept???

can you explain what you mean? THey did not accept what ? and why wouldnt they show it?

Alright so I went to the NASA website dedicated to streaming the SDO video of ISON's close up approach to the sun, and it appears to not only be
completely absent from the videos, but the videos themselves are a looped image repeated over, with time stamps included.

What is up with this website? Why is there no close up video of ISON's interaction with the sun?

It's ISON, it's not coming towards us, but it's getting dimmer, and seems to have just disintegrated into a puff of dust and possibly some larger
fragments. I think we can now officially say "bye bye" to ISON.

Well, the initial pictures didn't look like these ones that have been released. The initial ones showed Ison looking very different emerging on the
other side to the ones now. So which is it?
Rainbows
Jane

Well, the initial pictures didn't look like these ones that have been released. The initial ones showed Ison looking very different emerging on the
other side to the ones now. So which is it?
Rainbows
Jane

The tail effects took time to really see properly since the reduction in the nucleus mass and speed was far greater than expected.

The remaining dust and rubble still traveling at a good speed finally appeared, be in mind how big the sun is and how much "wash out" you get on all
the instruments etc. So simply delayed.

Nasa is good in circus shows... They made up to 5+ hours live stream and they all said : buy buy ison, till the last minute! I saw a part of it

while, if you check this video, ison pass really fast and left from the other side. So nasa wanted deliberately to convince people that ison was gone.
All in all, the SDO mp4 files are tweaked, so nasa also knew from the beginning that Ison was just fine, because they could see it there. And why they
faked the SDO sun videos? Why they hide the comets pass?

So what is your take on why they faked the video since you are so convinced that they did, and what exactly would be the reason to fake it?

This conversation/question belongs to another topic/section of this forum. If you check my prev comment, I link my 2 old posts into this topic... in
the "1st post" I even say that ISON will survive and I also discribed how ISON will look like after...

I watched the whole thing live - i am under no impression for any reason that any of it was faked.

Can you offer any ideas or speculation as to why 'they' would fake the exit, or deliberately delay the images?

EDIT: Delaying the images or updates could potentially be a safety net, like a pause on live tv so they can edit out accidents (aka swearing) in case
anything "unexpected" happened, that is to say that somthing other than breaking up, impacting or slinging as first projected.

I was listening and refreshing this and other threads for most of the swing-around too, and there was no indication of anything hidden. The NASA
people of the livecast seemed very disappointed, and were hoping against hope that something would emerge. When it didn't most of them left to eat
turkey, having given ISON it's obit. Only later did some of the images start to emerge, and I'd guess those same people who left for turkey may have
rushed back into the Nasa facility to share the new data as it became available with their colleagues, and they seem to have told the public about the
updates quite close to the time they found out themselves. Not a moment to be placed in the NASA Hall of Fame, but a livecast which will be reviewed
for what they can do better next time.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.