South you are one of the people that really makes this forum such a success. I appreciate all your contributions. Disagreement is what gives any discussion the air it needs to sustain knowledge gathering.

I apologize for the quick response before awaiting yours. Was just about to delete my comment.

He loves to argue how the M3 is better in every aspect and everytime something else comes close or beats the M he'll resort to the classic high school repponse " Lets see it in the twisties"

T-Bag......if you get a sec you should pick up an issue of R&T, Car&Driver, etc and see how close the C63 is in Handling, and braking! I believe that should cover OVERALL performance.......no?!?!

Aren't you the idiot who bought a M3 and complained it lacked torque? Maybe you should get off your ass and test drive a car before you buy one.

I have never made a statement like "wait till the twisties"....why don't you actually do some reading on this forum before you comment? Can you not read Quattro / drivetrain losses in my posts on this thread?

Better yet, start off another stupid thread like you already did.

Quote:

Originally Posted by footie

Maybe I was a bit harsh saying you and TB were one in the same. Sorry about that.

Swamp and I disagree with you on different planes... I poke at you because this is how we interact, nothing personal of course since we are mates.

As Swamp noted the RS4 has a nice engine. But the RS4 has a sucky drivetrain, period.

__________________

"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari