Hello Anne,
FYI, are you aware of a new Internet Draft "The
application/www-form-urlencoded format" [1] that tries to address some
shortcomings of x-www-form-urlencoded ?
cheers,
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoehrmann-urlencoded-01
2010/9/27 Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>:
> I discussed the application/x-www-form-urlencoded format with Ian earlier
> today. I'm not sure what the most appropriate place would be for this
> between the URL semantics/syntax specification and the URL API
> specification. Since you plan on specifying an API for query parameters it
> would make sense if the application/x-www-form-urlencoded format was defined
> together with the URL stuff. Yay more work? :-)
>
> Might even make sense to have all the URL stuff in one specification, but I
> do not know how that plays with IETF/W3C.
--
@prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name
"KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].