Dear Dan,
Thank you for your comments on the SSML specification last year. Our
responses are below.
If you believe we have not adequately addressed your issues with our
responses, please let us know as soon as possible. If we do not hear
from you within 14 days, we will take this as tacit acceptance.
Again, thank you for your input.
-- Dan Burnett
Synthesis Team Leader, VBWG
[VBWG responses are embedded, preceded by '>>>']
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 12:06 PM
To: www-voice@w3.org
Cc: w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org
Subject: error in Speech Synth doc re RDF acronym / referencing RDF
specs
http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-synthesis/#S3.4
...has an error:
"RDF" expands to "Resource Description Framework" not "...Format".
>>> Proposed disposition: Accepted
>>>
>>> We will correct this.
I have cc:'d the Semantic Web Coordination Group since there may be a
more general issue here w.r.t. the way your spec references RDF. W3C has a
new batch of clarified/bugfixed RDF specs approaching Last Call. We should
take care to note that your spec references RDF, and try to offer
suggestions for referencing this work rather than the older efforts currently
cited.
>>> Proposed disposition: Accepted
>>>
>>> We would appreciate any specific suggestions you have for
>>> more appropriate referencing of the RDF specifications for
>>> any of the Voice Browser Working Group's specifications (SSML,
>>> VoiceXML, SRGS).
I've not reviewed the rest of the doc yet, but wanted to jot down the
acronym expansion error and flag up the cross-spec referencing issue while
I have a minute.
cheers,
Dan