Every time one of the review sites issues a silly score, I'm reminded of the RVB PSA: Game On.

Sir Robin, the Not-Quite-So-Brave-As-Sir-Lancelot.
Who had nearly fought the Dragon of Angnor.
Who had almost stood up to the vicious Chicken of Bristol.
And who had personally wet himself, at the Battle of Badon Hill.

There isn't even a single flaw listed in the review, which is ironic because by logic shouldn't it be "more of the same with a new label"? That's what most shooter sequels are like, Halo isn't any different.

To be honest reviewing a game by giving it a score from 0-10 is stupid to begin with. You can't quantify how good a game is like that unless you have really specific criteria.

I agree fully, I dislike scores as a whole but I realize that it isn't going away so I just want to champion the 0-5 scoring which I find less obnoxious ^^
Scores are for people that don't care to read a full review, the what lies in the words not the number.