5 entries competed together for this second CodeWalrus contest. What we wish is that we could have gotten the chance to offer larger prizes for a few of the best entries, because many of the participants truly deserves it for getting an elaborate . Unfortunately, our status as an unaffiliated website ran mostly by students, low-income staff, along with the falling Canadian dollar exchange rate, have prevented us from doing so so far. We hope, however, that you have enjoyed this second CodeWalrus contest.

Without further ado, let's see who will win the CAD$30 and CAD$70 (approximately $22 and $50 in US dollars) gift cards for Steam(EDIT: Important announcement regarding Steam), iTunes or Amazon, depending of what the winner chooses and what is available in his country. Here are the contest results!

(click to show/hide)

*(20 pts) Originality: Is it just an old game of yours where you just replaced sprites with walruses? Is it just a guessing game (we never know)? *(20 pts) Walruses: How well did you integrate Walrii and/or its relatives into your game? Was your game choice reasonable? *(20 pts) Gameplay: How well does the game play? Are controls well-chosen? Is it too slow to be playable? *(15 pts) Fun: Is the game fun? Would you play it again in the future? *(15 pts) Graphics: How great the game looks like? How easy is it to distinguish stuff? *(10 pts) Size, speed, installing & bugs: Is the game file size reasonable for what it offers? Is it too slow? Is installation easy? is the game bug-ridden?Total: 100 points

We would like to congratulate the winner, the one who came in second place and everyone for their hard work for pulling off such games in just a bit over a month, despite school exams and life. And thanks everyone for participating!

Congrats to unicorn and c4ooo for winning the contest!(imho I think the votes were valued too high)

Votes value decrease every contest since 2010 (in this case, due to the lower amount of voters and the fact we could only vote for 1 entry), yet there is always someone who complains that it's still too high. As a result, I tend to take such criticism with a grain of salt. But I'll see what we can do for future contests. It's possible that we go for a judges-only thing like Cemetech (but then I bet someone will complain about lack of democracy )

Great job everyone on there contest entries! I personally think that semipro's entry was very nice, but I guess with less people having Nspires that was an issue.

And great job to you too, c4ooo! Your entry was definitely sorta addicting, except it could've used a menu with high scores, in my opinion. (I'm not trying to say that mine is better or anything like that) I think the judging was fair

Wow! I can't believe that Walrii Throw did well! It did not have the replay value, and was a little bit buggy with character selection and all that, but I guess it was an ok game...

Congrats to unicorn and c4ooo for winning the contest!(imho I think the votes were valued too high)

Votes value decrease every contest since 2010 (in this case, due to the lower amount of voters and the fact we could only vote for 1 entry), yet there is always someone who complains that it's still too high. As a result, I tend to take such criticism with a grain of salt. But I'll see what we can do for future contests. It's possible that we go for a judges-only thing like Cemetech (but then I bet someone will complain about lack of democracy )

Looks like I am that one person But really, I'm not trying to criticize you because I didn't do a thing related to the event

Congrats to unicorn and c4ooo for winning the contest!bote(imho I think the votes were valued too high)

Votes value decrease every contest since 2010 (in this case, due to the lower amount of voters and the fact we could only vote for 1 entry), yet there is always someone who complains that it's still too high. As a result, I tend to take such criticism with a grain of salt. But I'll see what we can do for future contests. It's possible that we go for a judges-only thing like Cemetech (but then I bet someone will complain about lack of democracy )

I think that the value of votes should depend on the number of votes. 'Value = 100/totalVotes' or something