Blog

blog

Media

media

Events

events

Scholars

Brexit questions for Theresa May and the Liaison Committee

The House of Commons Liaison Committee questions Prime Minister Theresa May on 20 December, a year to the day since it last did so. On Brexit, here’s what we think it should ask her.

Dr Brigid Fowler

Senior Researcher, Hansard Society

Dr Brigid Fowler

Brigid joined the Hansard Society in December 2016 to lead its work on Parliament and Brexit, as well as contribute to its ongoing research on the legislative process, parliamentary procedure and scrutiny, and public political engagement. From 2007 to 2014 she was a Committee Specialist for the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, where she led on the Committee’s EU-related work. In the first six months of 2016 she was on the research team of Britain Stronger in Europe. She has also worked as assistant to an MEP in Brussels and as an analyst and researcher on EU and European affairs in the private sector and at the University of Birmingham and King’s College London.

After completing BA and MPhil degrees at the University of Oxford in PPE and European Politics, respectively, she spent the first part of her career focusing on the politics of post-communist transition and EU accession in Central Europe, and completed her PhD at the University of Birmingham on the case of Hungary. She has given media comment, appeared before select committees and published several journal articles and book contributions.

After a general election-induced gap of a year since the last evidence session, it might have been hard for the Committee to decide on the other two topics, but Brexit was probably unavoidable.

Brexit is the quintessential all-of-government project on which the key decisions can only ultimately be made by the Prime Minister. As such, it is an archetypal issue for the Liaison Committee to address.

We identified five Brexit-related tasks the Liaison Committee could usefully fulfil.

Four are largely behind-the-scenes: steering select committees’ inquiry choices to avoid duplication; perhaps going further into some light-touch strategic planning; ensuring committees are sufficiently resourced for Brexit; and engaging with the government on committees’ behalf on Brexit process issues (although this last could also generate some public questioning).

The fifth task, the questioning of the Prime Minister, is the most high-profile. Along with Prime Minister’s Questions, Liaison Committee evidence sessions with the premier are among the few parliamentary proceedings to appear routinely on mainstream TV news broadcasts. As such, the Liaison Committee’s performance could affect public perceptions of Parliament’s Brexit role.

Conducted effectively, Liaison Committee evidence sessions with the Prime Minister can also generate an important element of the historical record. And, compared with statement or question sessions on the Floor of the House, or media interviews, they offer an unparalleled opportunity to probe the premier’s thinking and decision-making, and hold her to account.

Current Brexit context

The current evidence session will be an important first test of the capacity of the new Liaison Committee - under new chair Dr Sarah Wollaston - to fulfil these roles, above all in relation to Brexit.

Vast amounts of Brexitry have taken place since the previous Committee last heard from Mrs May a year ago.

That EU decision, opening the way to phase two negotiations from January on the terms for a post-Brexit transition, and from March on a framework for the post-transition UK-EU relationship, forms the immediate backdrop to the current Liaison Committee session.

But so does the government’s first parliamentary defeat since the general election, on 13 December on Amendment 7 to the EU (Withdrawal) Bill. As passed, the amendment requires Parliament to have approved any UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement in primary legislation before ministers may use the delegated powers in the EU (Withdrawal) Bill to implement it.

The Liaison Committee will question the Prime Minister as debate continues on the EU (Withdrawal) Bill’s final Committee Stage day, with a further contentious vote – on ‘exit day’ – due later in the evening.

The Liaison Committee session also comes the day after the Cabinet held what has been reported as its first formal discussion of the desired end-state for the UK’s post-transition economic relationship with the EU.

Brexit questions

The Liaison Committee is supported by expert staff, and considerable preparation typically goes into a prime ministerial evidence session.

But, in the spirit of seeking to improve Brexit scrutiny, here are our suggestions for some Brexit questions the Committee could usefully ask on 20 December.

1. Past Brexit decision-making

On what basis are you interpreting the wishes of those who voted Leave in the EU referendum?

Your October 2016 Conservative Party conference speech on Brexit had significant implications for the UK’s post-Brexit relationship with the EU. Have there been any such implications that you did not anticipate at the time?

Who did you consult before making that speech, and what material did you see in preparation?

Why did you decide on the end of March 2017 as your deadline for triggering Article 50?

What specific pieces of preparatory work for the negotiations did you ensure were done before you triggered Article 50?

When did you accept that talks with the EU on withdrawal issues and on the post-Brexit UK-EU relationship would take place sequentially, not in parallel?

For the record, can you confirm that the full Cabinet held its first formal discussion of the desired end-state for UK-EU economic relations on Tuesday 19 December 2017?

In June, the UK accepted the EU’s preference to sequence the negotiations into a phase one dealing only with withdrawal issues, before moving to transition and the future relationship. How, why and by whom was the UK decision to do so made?

2. Lesson-learning

Has anything surprised you about the Brexit negotiations so far?

Have you, or to your knowledge any of your ministers, sought information from third countries, or countries which joined the EU relatively recently, about their experiences of negotiating with the EU?

Are there lessons for Brexit to be learned from previous major all-of-government undertakings? If so, what are they?

To what do you attribute the government’s success in securing the EU’s agreement on 15 December that ‘sufficient progress’ has been achieved in phase one of the Brexit talks?

You set out at Lancaster House and in Florence, and in a series of government papers, a picture of a desired end-state UK-EU relationship; and yet there seems to be a perception, not least in the EU, that the government has not specified what it wants. Why do you think this is?

Have you learned any lessons in phase one of the Brexit talks that will cause you to do things differently in phase two, with respect to the government’s handling of the role of Parliament?

And, similarly, have you learned any lessons in phase one that will cause you to do things differently in future with respect to the devolved administrations?

Has the UK or the EU been the more transparent in its negotiating behaviour in phase one, or have they been roughly the same? In your experience, has the EU’s degree of transparency hampered its negotiating effectiveness?

3. Looking ahead: Phase two talks

Will the negotiations with the EU in phase two revert to taking place in pre-announced rounds, as they did in phase one between June and November?

For the record, could you set out the current roles in the Brexit negotiations of the Department for Exiting the European Union and the Europe Unit in the Cabinet Office?

How does the government plan to try to get the European Council (at 27) to adopt negotiating guidelines for the post-transition relationship in March that are as helpful to the UK as possible?

Will the government be tabling a formal paper to the negotiations on its desired post-transition economic relationship with the EU? If so, when, and what arrangements do you envisage for its parliamentary scrutiny?

Latest

blog / 04.09.19

Parliament and the Declaration of War in September 1939

3 September marked the 80th anniversary of the UK’s declaration of war on Nazi Germany. As the House of Commons again engages in tumultuous and historic proceedings, Professor Stuart Ball recounts the debates in the Chamber in the two preceding days that helped to precipitate the declaration.

‘Erskine May’, the authoritative guide to Parliament’s procedures and practice, went online on 2 July. The move has significant implications for democratic transparency and for Parliament’s interaction with the public. Here, one of the editors of the new edition, Clerk of the Journals Mark Hutton, explains why and how the innovation came about.

Power of the Purse: what is the Estimates process and how does it work?

Some backbench MPs are seeking to use House of Commons approval of the government’s Main Estimates for 2019-20 as a vehicle against a ‘no-deal’ Brexit, meaning the process is attracting greater interest than usual. We set out how the Estimates process works, how it has changed over the years, and how it could be improved in the future.

The increased stature of select committees and their chairs: reflections by Harriet Harman MP

On the 40th anniversary of the creation of departmental select committees, Harriet Harman, the longest continuously-serving woman MP, offers some personal reflections on the growing importance of select committees and their chairs, particularly at a time of considerable political instability.