The United State Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, has denied an appeal by Rick Perry and the three other plaintiffs who filed suit to get on the Virginia GOP primary ballot.

The circuit judges today said that, For the reasons expressed herein, the court denies the motion for the requested injunctive relief. They cited the impending deadline to send out absentee ballots, by Jan. 21.

In the ruling papers, the judges also said, Movant had every opportunity to challenge the various Virginia ballot requirements at a time when the challenge would not have created the disruption that this last-minute lawsuit has.

The suit was originally filed by Texas Governor Rick Perry. Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Jon Hunstmanwho dropped out of the presidential race yesterday-- later joined the challenge.

On Friday, Jan. 13, Judge Gibney denied the suit.

According to documents, the candidates had asked the Court for a preliminary injunction ordering that they be listed on the ballot for the Virginia Republican primary despite the fact all failed to meet the 10,000 signature petition requirements to get on the ballot.

Only candidates Mitt Romney and Ron Paul met the state requirements.

The candidates argued that the 10,000 signature requirement and the Virginia rule that only registered state voters may collect petition signatures violates the Constitution.

They also challenged Virginia's rule that required candidates secure 400 signatures from voters in each congressional district calling it "burdensome."

The judge ruled that Virginia rules do infringe on First Amendment rights, but the challenge from the candidates came too late for courts to take action.

In his opinion issued on Friday, Judge Gibney wrote, "They [the candidates hoping to appear on the ballot] knew the rules in Virginia many months ago; the limitations on circulators affected them as soon as they began to circulate petitions. The plaintiffs could have challenged the Virginia law at that time. Instead, they waited until after the time to gather petitions had ended and they had lost the political battle to be on the ballot; then on the eve of the printing of absentee ballots, they decided to challenge Virginia's laws."

The ACLU of Virginia, which supported Perry's effort, said the judge's ruling will bring about change in Virginia.

"For the ACLU, the most important part of the decision is the judge's recognition that the Virginia law violates the right of free speech," ACLU of Virginia Executive Director Kent Willis wrote in a statement. "This clearly unconstitutional law will now almost certainly be repealed by the General Assembly or struck down in court. Either way, its end is near."

In further explaining why he denied the candidates an injunction, Judge Gibney wrote, "The traditional purpose of a preliminary injunction is to prohibit an action. Preliminary injunctions are meant to protect the status quo."

He continued, "In this case, the plaintiffs request that the Court require the Board to add their names to the primary ballot, which is a positive act that alters the status quo."

"I am pleased that the district court is allowing Virginia's orderly election process to move forward. The ruling today dealt only with the request for a preliminary injunction. The litigation is ongoing, and therefore, I will have no further comment," Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli wrote in a statement released after Friday's ruling.

Republican Party Virginia Chairman Pat Mullins said, in a statement, he was disappointed that more Republican candidates are not on our primary ballot.

Political analyst Paul Goldman called the ruling predictable. He told CBS 6 he was glad to see Judge John Gibney believed Virginia's rules were unconstitutional.

"It needs to be fixed, and the State Board of elections knew this. I don't know why they didn't fix it before," Goldman said.

CBS 6 Political Analyst Dr. Bob Holsworth agreed.

"The General Assembly is going to have to change the way Virginia collects petitions in the future. I think there's no doubt about that," said Holsworth.

As far as Im concerned, the states should call off their primaries, save some money, and force the people to face reality.

The Presidential Primary may have a few folks down in the mouth, but we have important down ticket races in these Primaries. Our chances look pretty good for electing another Conservative to replace Boob Casey here in PA. The Primaries are important this election cycle to clean out some of the dead wood.

6
posted on 01/17/2012 2:34:57 PM PST
by Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)

I’m from Virginia, and it’s mostly forcing most folks to just stay home instead of participating. I’m going strictly to vote for Ron Paul...making it a vote-against-Mitt moment only. I think this is silly that I have no real choices in the state, and I understand the state’s rule process. But you basically have the state Republican party offering me nothing to vote on....so most folks will just stay home that day.

Mullins’ days in politics are about over. You read through his list of elections, positions, awards, triumphs, and so forth at http://www.rpv.org/node/245 and consider the fact that when he finally reached the apex of almost any professional campaign manager ~ State Chairman ~ he had TWO RESIDENTS FROM VIRGINIA VYING TO GET ON THE VIRGINIA PRIMARY BALLOT and he blew it big time! Just totally FAIL. Snaked out by a guy who’s never had a real job (Bolling) and another one who’s got so much money he never needed one (Romney).

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.