The vote this weekend to strike down 17 of Mr. Karzai’s 24 choices for ministers comes days before Parliament breaks for a six-week recess. When the members reconvene, they will spend another week or more vetting Karzai’s second choices. Shortly thereafter, the government will be focused on parliamentary elections slated for May 22.

The international community had hoped to move quickly past last year’s fraud-ridden presidential elections by pairing a new surge of foreign troops with a new push for a more effective Afghan government. Instead, the messy process – while a potentially positive step for democracy – threatens to delay governing.

“We were hoping that by early 2010 we might have a new cabinet and could move forward. But now in front of us we have a cabinet crisis and in a few months we will have issues with Parliamentary elections,” says Haroun Mir, an analyst with the Center for Research and Policy Studies in Kabul. “The likelihood of having another dysfunctional government for 2010 is very high right now.”

The other casualty of the cabinet fight could be efforts to ensure a smoother election this year than last, says Nadery.

Step forward for democracy?

Some members of Parliament, however, argue that the delay over the cabinet marks an important achievement for Afghan government.

“This is not the sign of political crisis, this is the sign of democracy, a sign that Parliament is there, and the president is not the only decisionmaker,” says Shukria Barakzai, a member of Parliament from Kabul.

The Afghan Parliament has rarely been able to rally its members in opposition to Karzai’s decisions, making it an ineffective check on the president’s powers. With this action, some MPs suggest that Parliament may be finding its footing as a more equal partner.

The most prominent nominee to be rejected was Ismail Khan, a warlord who wields considerable influence in western Afghanistan. In some cases such as his, MPs could argue the vote was about elevating merit over might, but overall there did not appear to be a unifying principle or faction behind the 17 rejections.

Instead, the seven ministers who were confirmed had the most in common. Most were already serving in the cabinet and most enjoyed international support.