What I’m asking is, is there anything in particular which you think deserves attention? The page seems to contain a lot of claims. What is the best evidence/logic provided which convinced you personally?

The matrix of ancient history is an introduction nothing more nothing the less. He picks up where A.T. Fomenko left. What he is trying to proof is that history before the 1700’s is almost complete in the dark.
Another good source for getting some information:http://www.chronologiekritik.net/

I have to manually upgrade free memberships to Part Membership, and this can sometimes (although rarely) take me a day or two, depending on email backlogs and also the fact that I try to have a life away from this computer. Your account has now been upgraded so I hope you enjoy the content which awaits you. Cheers.