I'm a libertarian atheist who enjoys reading, playing instruments, debating, and learning about everything. I very much enjoy politics, and I believe in the separation of church and state, as well as maximum freedom and liberty. I cannot talk to a person unless they pose some kind of intelligence, that's just the way I am. I love discussing life, the meaning behind it, and everything that involves deep thought/philosophical thinking. I am a chatterbox, and will often write long paragraphs about something, and you won't find me using short answers unless I'm not interested.
I like to sing, and I play the clarinet, guitar, and drums. I write essays for fun and am very opinionated, but will change my opinion if there is reason that I am wrong.
My personality type is INTP, but I show my extroversion quite often when around friends. I would love to be an astronomer/astrophysicist/cosmologist when I am older.

Activities:

Amatuer astronomy, reading, writing.

Beliefs:

Atheist (because of lack of evidence for a deity), and total/maximum freedom for all (libertarian).

I am going to be arguing that the title of this debate is NOT reasonable. My opponent will attempt to give an argument as to why the Bible should be the law of the land, and that the moral teachings/commandments/commands of the book should be adopted into law. (I do realize it is against the Constitituon, but this is simply a "what if...and why" topic and probably won't ever happen) First Round: Acceptance Second Round: Opening argument Third Round: Rebuttals Fourth Round: Further argument...

I am going to be arguing that the title of this debate is NOT true. My opponent will attempt to give an argument as to why modern, 3rd-wave feminism is beneficial to America, and does not cause any harm. First Round: Acceptance Second Round: Opening argument Third Round: Rebuttals Fourth Round: Further argument/rebuttal Fifth Round: Closing The only rules are to keep this civil and without personal insult (e.g. ad hominem) I wish you the best of luck, opponent!...