On Jun 23, 2005, at 8:24 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> Until just now, I had forgotten that sometimes you really do need a
> python that's built with the same compiler you're testing for -- I
> guess that's something we'll need to build into BBv2.

Can you expand on that "sometimes"?

All of the Python failures on gcc-3.4.4-linux disappeared once I built
Python with it; should I do the same for the other gcc-*-linux
variants?