Jenna have you sent heads-up private messages to any of those people on the list?

If not I can help PM those who don't yet have their bet re-placed next to their username.

My PM is always full, so if you don't mind sending them a heads up that will help. As for the Odds.....If I made it 1 to 1 it only helps those that have currently the enough to do so. So like Chuck did....just figure out what the odds would be to get you what you should of walked away with if that event was paid out correctly...I can adjust the odds anytime before it closes

anyone that has the correct amount of v-cash, can place the adjusted amounts by their name at 1 to 1 odds

Haggis McJackass 4700 (5327)
2/15(0.13)

That's fine, but I don't have 5327 vcash to spare right now.

Now, with politeness, I am getting jerked around here.

I missed out on a 4000 refund when Tony Salam, my bet, pulled out of Prizefighter ahead of the tournament and did not compete.

On the same event, my 4000 winnings on a bet of 500 on Mendy were s****ped when the event was abandoned because of post-fight vbookie ****around.

I ate these significant losses with grace, because I can see that you vbookies are all volunteers.

Now, Boxing Girl, acknowledge that over 13,000 vcash in lost winnings/refunds, in three weeks, that is bull****. That's all my bankroll, I have nothing left to bet with. You can't dangle a large payout on a winning bet in front of me, conditional to buying the ticket again if I can afford it.

What I would like is for an option to be created just for me, to bet 1 vcash at 13,327/1. That's only to reclaim what is rightfully mine. I think that's fair, and then I consider all of this to be settled.

I missed out on a 4000 refund when Tony Salam, my bet, pulled out of Prizefighter ahead of the tournament and did not compete.

On the same event, my 4000 winnings on a bet of 500 on Mendy were s****ped when the event was abandoned because of post-fight vbookie ****around.

I ate these significant losses with grace, because I can see that you vbookies are all volunteers.

Now, Boxing Girl, acknowledge that over 13,000 vcash in lost winnings/refunds, in three weeks, that is bull****. That's all my bankroll, I have nothing left to bet with. You can't dangle a large payout on a winning bet in front of me, conditional to buying the ticket again if I can afford it.

What I would like is for an option to be created just for me, to bet 1 vcash at 13,327/1. That's only to reclaim what is rightfully mine. I think that's fair, and then I consider all of this to be settled.

Thank you.

I could give a 2 ****s about past losses not related to this event....those would of been on the other bookies to fix.....I'm only doing this one as my co-host screwed it up and his time is better spent working on our show then playing around in here....just put the correct betting odds for this event is you want a payout.

Haggis, I must respectfully disagree about the Prizefighter situation.

You did not, in fact, lose any vcash whatsoever. The event was abandoned, which means that all stakes were returned. The order of the bets got all jumbled, and I had to re-order them properly so people got the proper amount that they had actually wagered returned to them - but you did not lose anything. Everything you staked was returned to you in one piece.

In a perfect world, there would not have been technical difficulties and a payout could have been done, where anybody who bet on Mendy got winnings at the advertised odds.

HOWEVER.

In a perfect world, Salam also wouldn't have pulled out. Even if there hadn't been those technical difficulties, one of the bet options being s****ped with a fighter pulling out means that the entire event gets abandoned. That's just how it works, and has always worked.

That event was doomed from the start, with all the names popping in and out of the tournament up to the actual day of it.

Nobody would have been paid out, no matter what, because of the Salam situation. Fair is fair, and when an event becomes null and void, it's abandoned (all stakes returned). You can't "lose" anything on an abandoned event. You get your wagered money back and it's like nothing ever happened.

You are not entitled to the prospective winnings you would have had on an abandoned event if the event hadn't become null and void by a fighter pulling out.

You got your original $4000 back from betting on Salam, and your original $500 back from betting on Mendy (as well as your $125 on Paul David). You just didn't profit from the event - nobody did. You didn't take a hit, though.

So all that about being over 13,000 down is actually inaccurate. You're only down whatever was tied up in this situation with Hopkins and Arnaoutis.

Mcjackass, next time you get credited with 75 vcash, stick it in the event up top and Jenna will amend your odds to 70/1.

You'll be sorted then.

No!!!

I would strongly advise against that course of action.

That's exactly how things get jumbled in the first place, when you edit the date of an event or one of the options after people have already actively placed bets on it. The order gets all out of whack and it's a ***** to get it right, especially the more bet options there are. It's a ****ty glitch, but we have to live with it until the creators of VBookie release a version that doesn't have it.

That's exactly how things get jumbled in the first place, when you edit the date of an event or one of the options after people have already actively placed bets on it. The order gets all out of whack and it's a ***** to get it right, especially the more bet options there are. It's a ****ty glitch, but we have to live with it until the creators of VBookie release a version that doesn't have it.

I don't have that problem, as I have edited the odds quite a few times on my events and have not had a issue. In the worst case I can handle it the way I handled the Wimbledon situation....make all the odds even so at least everyone gets paid out.