Bain compensation call no surprise: Karam

Joe Karam: 'Having your freedom taken away and being
incarcerated for years for something that you didn't do, no
amount of money can probably fix that up because your life
is irrevocable destroyed.'

Long-time David Bain supporter Joe Karam says he's not
surprised by a judge's recommendation that Mr Bain receives
Government compensation for being wrongfully imprisoned for the
murder of his parents, brother and two sisters.

According to a confidential report on David Bain's claim for
wrongful imprisonment, obtained by the New Zealand Herald,
Canadian Supreme Court judge Ian Binnie believes that on the
balance of probabilities, Mr Bain is innocent and should be
compensated.

Justice Binnie came to New Zealand in July to interview Mr
Bain and other people, including the police, whom the defence
accused of planting a spectacle lens, a key piece of evidence
in the prosecution case.

Mr Karam, who has campaigned for years for Mr Bain, told
TV3's Firstline programme today he was not surprised by this
finding.

"If the report is accurate, and on the assumption that it is,
I'm not at all surprised that Justice Binnie has found that
David Bain is innocent because anyone who analyses the
evidence carefully, as Justice Binnie certainly has done over
the last 12 months, would come to the same conclusion.

"As I've always said, I believe that the evidence shows that
David Bain is innocent and according to this report that is
what Justice Binnie has determined after his very lengthy and
careful analysis of getting on to 10,000 pages of evidence."

Mr Karam said it was difficult to put a dollar figure on how
much compensation Mr Bain should receive.

"Having your freedom taken away and being incarcerated for
years for something that you didn't do, no amount of money
can probably fix that up because your life is irrevocable
destroyed."

Speaking to reporters in Japan, Prime Minister John Key
refused to offer a view on Mr Binnie's recommendations.

"I know the Minister of Justice has received the report and
is taking some advice. I personally haven't read the report.
I've had some top line indications of what is in the report.
I'm just not in a position to comment."

The Cabinet would need to fully consider the recommendations
and advice it might receive before making a decision, Mr Key
said.

Mr Bain was convicted of murdering his parents, Margaret 50,
and Robin 58, and his siblings, Arawa, 19, Laniet, 18, and
Stephen, 14, in June 1994 by shooting them with a .22 rifle.

He had served almost 13 years of his minimum 16-year life
sentence when the Privy Council quashed his convictions in
2007 and ordered a retrial. He was acquitted after the
three-month retrial in Christchurch in 2009.

Former Justice Minister Simon Power chose an overseas judge
to examine Mr Bain's application for compensation because of
the high-profile nature of the case in New Zealand.

The Cabinet faces a difficult decision over Justice Binnie's
findings because of the polarised views about Mr Bain's
innocence and because his case falls outside the 1998
guidelines for compensation for wrongful conviction and
imprisonment.

Under those guidelines, eligible claimants must have had a
pardon or had their convictions quashed on appeal without the
order of a retrial.

But it has the discretion to pay compensation if it is
convinced there are "extraordinary circumstances".

And there is a precedent for compensation in a case that
falls outside the guidelines.

Last year, Aaron Farmer was paid $351,575 by the Government
and received a statement of innocence and an apology for his
conviction in 2005 for rape. He served two years and three
months of an eight-year sentence.

If a similar formula were applied to 13 years' imprisonment,
the figure would be $1.94 million, with possible add-ons for
pecuniary loss and improper conduct by the authorities.

The Ministry of Justice will report to the Cabinet on whether
"extraordinary circumstances" exist, and if so, how much
should be paid.