Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!!

yeah, i was going to ask him is he wanted to change that up just a little bit, but now it all makes sense.
sounds like dylan looked very good. don't understand the thing with mitch. looks like he was awesome. unless sos just see's something in him, and wants to really light a fire under his ass.

sounds like it was a good scrimmage. that is great in so many ways, considering that the juniors were there for junior day.

starting to scratch my head about these walkons. you always hear a little bit about one here or there, but from what i am reading on several different boards, the walkons are looking as good, if not better than a lot of the vets. and not just one, but several of them. wow.

__________________Tact is for those who are not witty enough for Sarcasm...

According to my tweets, Spurrier likes how quickly Orth gets the pass out while Connor still holds onto the ball too long....that's the only criticism I saw on Connor, although he is a RS-Freshman this year. In previous practices SOS commented on how Orth throws the prettiest ball out there. He throws a tight spiral, which gets SOS's juices flowing....

It started out as a reverse to Pharoah and he threw it across the field to Orth, but the defense read it well. The defender tipped it instead of going for the INT and Orth caught it off the tip and walked into the end zone. The entire offense went crazy, it was pretty awesome.

yeah, but you do have to pay attention to 5-8 for 95 yards. that still sounds a lot better than 6-13 for 89 yards. that's like 70 something percent completion percentage against less than 50 percent. i'm still scratching my head on this one. maybe sos will change his mind after looking at the film.

__________________Tact is for those who are not witty enough for Sarcasm...

yeah, but you do have to pay attention to 5-8 for 95 yards. that still sounds a lot better than 6-13 for 89 yards. that's like 70 something percent completion percentage against less than 50 percent. i'm still scratching my head on this one. maybe sos will change his mind after looking at the film.

I didn't see the scrimmage, but your post assumes the completion percentages of each were due only to the accuracy of the throws of each QB. What if all 13 attempts were on target but the receivers dropped the ball several times? Then on the other side, 4 of the 5 completions were because of spectacular efforts from the receivers. Wouldn't that make the raw numbers not quite as important? Again, I'm not saying that IS what happened, simply mentioning the possibility that the numbers don't always tell the whole story.