TERRAFORMING TERRA
We discuss and comment on the role agriculture will play in the containment of the CO2 problem and address protocols for terraforming the planet Earth.
A model farm template is imagined as the central methodology. A broad range of timely science news and other topics of interest are commented on.

Monday, May 6, 2013

Cancer Doctors Protest Drug Costs

What a surprise! The sheep are finally squealing. Of course it is obscene profiteering driven
entirely by the inability of the insurance industry to contain their own costs
when everything they do is juiced on the way through and more is better for
them as it rationalizes higher premiums.

We are rapidly reaching a point were tens cents of medical care is delivered for a dollar spent. The present state easily approaches twenty five cents at best provided my comparables happen to be fairly efficient and that is unlikely. It has been seriously
unsustainable for so many years that we can not see through the pain anymore.

It needs to be radically reformed
or outright abandoned. The latter
remains the most likely.

Just remember that the private
insurance model as presently operated has completely failed however often they
bleat. Keeping that in mind avoids a lot
of self serving lies. Fortunately most productive
people stay healthy most of their lives and avoid most of the ugly.

With some new, potentially lifesaving cancer drugs costing up to
$138,000 a year, about 120 leading cancer specialists have joined forces in an
unusual protest aimed at getting pharmaceutical companies to cut prices.

Charging high prices for drugs cancer patients need to survive is like
“profiteering” from a natural disaster by jacking up prices for food and other
necessities, leading cancer doctors and researchers from around the world
contend in a new paper published in Blood, the journal of the American Society of
Hematology.

Of 12 new cancer drugs that received FDA approval last year, 11 of them
cost in excess of $100,000 a year—prices that the specialists attack as
“astronomical,” “unsustainable,” and maybe even immoral. What’s more, only
three of these drugs were found to improve patient survival rates and of these,
two only increased it by less than two months, according to the Washington Post.

“Advocating for lower drug prices is a necessity to save the lives of
patients,” say the specialists who wrote the paper, who specialize in chronic
myelogenous leukemia (CML), but emphasize that sky-high drug costs affect
patients with many types of cancer.

Going Bankrupt to Stay Alive

“Medical illness and drug prices are the single most frequent cause of personal bankruptcy” in the US, according to the specialists, where patients’ copayments on drug prices average 20 percent of the total cost of the drug. That means that cancer patients often face having to shell out $20,000 to $30,000 a year, simply to stay alive.

The specialists also note that astronomical drug prices may be the
single most common reason why patients stop taking lifesaving drugs. This is
particularly true for those with CML, which requires daily treatment for
long-term survival.

As a result the paper says, “grateful patients may have become the ‘financial victims’ of the treatment success, having to pay the high price annually to stay alive.” One study found that 10 percent of cancer patients fail to fill new prescriptions for oral cancer drugs.

For some patients, such as breast cancer survivor Patti Tyree, medical
costs—not the disease—are stealing their future. The 57-year-old postal worker
inherited $25,000, but after just one round of treatment for breast cancer,
nearly half of the money is gone—and bills continue to pour in, she told USA Today.

One of the more expensive therapies for CML is Gleevac, a cancer drug
that generated $4.7 billion in sales last year, making it the bestselling drug
for its manufacturer, Novartis. Another Novartis leukemia drug, Tasigna, had
sales of $1 billion, according
to The New York Times.

Doctors Pressure Drug Companies to Slash Prices

Some of the specialists who joined the protest were inspired by the doctors from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) who refused to use a new colon cancer drug called Zaltrap because it cost more than twice as much ($11,063 on average for one month of treatment) as another drug (Avastin) without improving outcomes.

“Soaring spending has presented the medical community with a new
obligation. When choosing treatments for a patient, we have to consider the
financial strains they may cause alongside the benefits they might deliver,”
the MSKCC doctors wrote in an
October, 2012 op-ed for The New York Times about their
boycott.

Subsequently, the drug’s manufacturer slashed the price by 50 percent.

Cancer Drugs Rank Among the World’s Most Expensive

The idea that "one cannot put a price on a human life” has led to
wildly overblown healthcare costs in the U.S., estimated at $2.7 trillion in
2011, according to the paper’s authors, who urge insurers and government to
more aggressively negotiate with pharmaceutical companies.

Many reports show that cancer drugs consistently rank as the most
expensive therapies, even though some only extend life by a few months or offer
no benefit over older, less expensive drugs.

The paper discussed Gleevac, which was originally priced at about
$30,000 a year when it was approved in 2001. Since then, the price has tripled.
However, its manufacturer told The New York Times that relatively few
patients actually pay the full cost—and that the price reflects the high cost
of developing new medications, which reportedly exceeds $1 billion.

Yet even doctors involved with developing Gleevac, such as Dr. Brian
Druker, are criticizing Novartis, which raked in $4.7 billion in sales for the
drug in 2012.

“If you are making $3 billion a year on Gleevec, could you get by with
$2 billion?” Dr. Druker, now director of Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon
Health and Science University, said in an interview with The New York
Times. “When do you cross the line from essential profits to profiteering?”

No comments:

About Me

18 years old, having cleaned out my HS library, I concluded the only ambition worth having was becoming a great genius. An inner voice cheered. Yet it is my path I have shared much to the Human Gesalt. Mar 2017 - 4.56 Mil Pg Views, March 2013 - Posted my paper introducing CLOUD COSMOLOGY & NEUTRAL NEUTRINO described as the SPACE TIME PENDULUM. Sep 2010 -My essay titled A NEW METRIC WITH APPLICATIONS TO PHYSICS AND SOLVING CERTAIN HIGHER ORDERED DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS has been published in Physics Essays(AIP) June 2010 quarterly. 40 years ago I took an honors degree in applied mathematics from the University of Waterloo. My interest was Relativity and my last year there saw me complete a 900 level course under Hanno Rund on his work in Relativity. I continued researching new ideas and knowledge since that time and I have prepared a book for publication titled Paradigms Shift. I maintain my blog as a day book and research tool to retain data, record impressions, interpretations and to introduce new insights to readers.