The hotel maid who claims former IMF boss Dominique Strauss-Kahn raped her has been accused of working as a prostitute.

Allegations have emerged that the 32-year-old cleaner was was taking extra money from male guests at the hotel for sex.

'There is information... of her getting extraordinary tips, if you know what I mean. And it's not for bringing extra f**king towels,' a source close to the defence investigation told the New York Post.

The woman also had 'a lot of her expenses  hair braiding, salon expenses  paid for by men not related to her,' the source added.

As Strauss-Kahn was yesterday sensationally released from house arrest and had his security ankle tag removed, it emerged in a letter to court from Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon that the woman:

It may well be true, given that DSK is released on his own cognisance it probably is true, but on the other hand it was expected that the defence would throw this kind of dirt around, whether true or not.

Let us wait and see until the trial finishes.

2
posted on 07/02/2011 10:24:18 AM PDT
by ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)

If this woman isn’t an American citizen, and she is engaging in both prostitution and international intrigue tying up the court system with her accusations against a powerful figure, isn’t she the very definition of an undesirable alien?

Even if she has permanent residency, can’t she be deported for this behavior?

You decent naive soul. She will make millions in book deals, maybe even a movie. Later she will be elected to the U.S. Congress and maybe President. Then filled with honors she will retire with a $100,000,000 per year pension paid for by the taxpayer and filled with the highest honors will die of old age on her $250,000,000 estate in the Colorado Rockies. Such is today’s fate of of those who used to be considered foul and vice ridden.

14
posted on 07/02/2011 10:38:14 AM PDT
by AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)

Yes, they can and are, but it does not make a false allegation any more legitimate. Too much is now coming out about this woman and if you were DSK, wouldn’t you use all your resources to defend yourself? Remember the Duke University students? Rich whites are a favorite target.

17
posted on 07/02/2011 10:41:53 AM PDT
by Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)

I think the trial should proceed anyway. If her background is relevant, so is his - he has a pattern of doing exactly the kinds of things she accused him of, relying on his position to get away with it. All that came out with this.

Her co-workers who found her directly after the incident would have something to say. So would those in the NYPD who routinely deal with these kind of crimes and were convinced credible charges should be filed against him.

In answer to your questions: yes; and of course lawyers do what they’re paid to do, and the more you pay them, the more they do.

There was another article yesterday that pretty much lays out the case against this woman and how she set DSK up. We’re talking taped evidence among other things.

The only thing the article yesterday didn’t go into was how they have significant amounts of money being deposited into this woman’s bank accounts (recall she’s on the dole). Now with the accusation popping up that she’s a whore, well, now the other large amounts of cash. Even caught her lawyer off-guard.

The only question I have is whether she’ll be prosecuted and deported. Probably not.

20
posted on 07/02/2011 10:57:23 AM PDT
by VeniVidiVici
(Join the AFL-CIO. The Communist Party needs new blood.)

“Too much is now coming out about this woman and if you were DSK, wouldnt you use all your resources to defend yourself?” That’s what struck me as well. All of a sudden, the demons from hell were unleashed (motivated by $$ no doubt).Perhaps the truth is somewhere in the middle, but there is a stench here.

If he’s innocent, a lot of people are going ot look like total idiots, the DM among them who were quick enough to condemn him. The women protesting in the streets against rape, the feminists, the neighbors who he was on excellent relations with and I can’t imagine how this is affecting his daughter.

23
posted on 07/02/2011 11:04:26 AM PDT
by Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)

Certainly with her credibility compromised, the prosecution has its work cut out. But, as I understand it, her credibility issues arise from her immigration status, association with unsavory characters and purportedly drug dealings. It is possible that while she is not pure as the driven snow, the rape also took place.

Her being a prostitute may be a stretch if, as was written in the early days of this soap opera, she lives in public housing specially set aside for HIV/AIDS sufferers. Also, over the past weeks there have been several revelations about DSK’s escapades, but I haven’t read of any ‘clients’ of the woman having stepped forward (but who would?). I also can’t reconcile the idea of rich, powerful men staying in $3500/night hotel suites not ordering up the city’s best prostitutes if they’re after pay-for sex. It just doesn’t add up, but none of this makes much sense. The evidence is that there was sex, now its nature is an open question.

New York is rotten to the core and if you can pay there you can pay anywhere...

Strauss-Kahn is a modern day Marquis de Sade, an aristocratic serial rapist and quite possibly an accomplished killer.

He got caught up with an equally conniving piece of shiite and there was an unavoidable scene.

So, now the New York establishment has to run this big puppet show to find out if this raped whore has any information on any of the other equally filthy VIP characters they love before they arrange a cover up and her death...

Strauss-Kahn is a modern day Marquis de Sade, an aristocratic serial rapist and quite possibly an accomplished killer.

He got caught up with an equally conniving piece of shiite and there was an unavoidable scene.

So, now the New York establishment has to run this big puppet show to find out if this raped whore has any information on any of the other equally filthy VIP characters they love before they arrange a cover up and her death...

It may well be true, given that DSK is released on his own cognisance it probably is true, but on the other hand it was expected that the defence would throw this kind of dirt around, whether true or not.

The biggest problem is that the accuser will be forced to testify in a trial. If her character is so shady and her story has holes in it (I understand the latter to be the biggest reason why the case is likely to be dropped), then there’s no way any marginally competent prosecutor would let it go to trial. If he did, he would stand a very good chance of having the alleged victim turn into the star witness for the defense.

She and her partners figured out how to game the system, and has been doing it quite successfully. Sexual crimes in America? The accused white male is guilty until proven innocent. It’s a trend, fashion, just like the so-called Recovered Memory Syndrome was in fashion during the 80s, destroying lives of thousands of innocent men. Nowadays it’s Catholic priests and other white males.

This is New York where a man was accused of sexual harassment for holding a door open for a woman. (A European pointed me to a link in a New York newspaper.)

The prosecutor (one Cyrus Vance, Jr, wouldn’t you know) is now trying to figure out how drop the charges with minimal damage to New York’s treasury, as the accused criminal is certain to sue.

I recognize the problems with her story, and with her as a witness. Those closer to the case should make the decision. From my distance I still say the case should be made against the annoying acronym, who may very well be guilty without ever being convicted or even tried - he seems to have been so several times before.

There is physical evidence of sexual contact, including trauma; there are the witnesses to a traumatized woman after the attack she’s alleged; there are the police who deal with rape cases, and their professional opinions; and facing that there’s a smirking socialist with almost inexhaustible funds to influence the media and, by doing so, the justice system.

Let it all be heard in open court, even if he’s not convicted. Would you trust this skell with a woman you cared about as his employee or servant? Let it be widely known all that there is to be made public in this case.

If this woman isnt an American citizen, and she is engaging in both prostitution and international intrigue tying up the court system with her accusations against a powerful figure, isnt she the very definition of an undesirable alien?

Even if she has permanent residency, cant she be deported for this behavior?
............................................................

At the least we could put her in with Obama’s Aunt Zuni, in a Boston slum. Deporting is such a hard thing to do.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.