Friday, September 20, 2013

After Sandy Hook last year, you cannot be too careful on school security. Whether its schools, military bases or just the public in general, it takes very little to get a gun into many public places and some people just do not care about anyone including themselves. Many schools have adopted measures from being buzzed in, video surveillance in every part of the school and doing background checks on parents and volunteers that work with our young people. In Waterford for instance, every school will have a check point after all renovations have been completed and you will not have access to the building. In the story below, Huron Valley and Walled Lake Schools have taken a serious approach to solving the security issue.

Walled Lake, Huron Valley Schools Update Security Technologies

BY ANNE SEEBALDT

CONTRIBUTING WRITER

In the wake of the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary, and others like
it, schools are more concerned than ever about how to keep their
students, staff and administrators out of harm’s way.
Walled Lake Consolidated School District already had undertook
measures during the 2012-13 school year that included locking its doors
and installing door monitors at each open door of each school. The
monitors inquired of visitors who they were, and where they were going
and directed them to the office, where they needed to sign in.
That was the first portion of a three-phase plan, explained Superintendent Ken Gutman.

The second was implemented at the start of the 2013-14 school year.
Every building in the district has a AIPHONE audio/video intercom system
installed at its entry doors, Which was installed before the start of
the school year, said Bill Chatfield, director of operations.
“It’s worked very well,” Chatfield said. “The system allows each
school to have locked doors all day long and for visitors to be
identified before they enter the building by office staff ”.
Here’s how it works, he said: The visitor presses the button,
notifying the person in the main office, He or she speaks with the
visitor, asks who they are, and who the person is there to see. Once the
visitor is properly identified, the office staff member pushes the
button that releases the door latch.
Judy Evola, director of community relations added, “We always had a
sign in and sign out; it’s merely the intercom allowing them access to
the building. They still have to go to the office, get a visitor badge
and sign out.”
She added, “The whole purpose of the system is to keep our buildings
locked all day while students are in our building. You can never be too
safe. The more barriers we put up, the more obstacles, the safer they
are.”
Gutman said, “We are so grateful for our secretaries, they do such a
wonderful job already.” Now they also are in charge of running the new
system, identifying people before they enter at all facilities in the
district.
Next in line are the security items which are included in the bond
issue that will be voted upon November. 6, he said. The bond was
primarily called for because, based on district parents’ input, their
top priority was their children’s safety.
“They are willing to give up immediacy (of access) for safety,” the
superintendent added. “We’d rather err on the side of caution. We’re
going to treat all of our children like our own children.”
Chatfield said the initial items post-passage of a bond would include
enhanced security surveillance inside and outside of each school, “to
provide enhanced visibility and observation of all visitors.” Other
items for the future are keyless entry systems for all schools. Staff
and others with authorization would be issued key cards to swipe to gain
entry.
Additional safety measures the district hopes to incorporate are
upgrades to security alarms, fire alarm replacement, new Public Address
(PA) and mass notification systems. Evola added that the district, which
currently uses an analog phone system, also should upgrade to a new
phone system.
Huron Valley Schools is still in the process of choosing a new,
unified security system that will take its security to the next level,
as discussed in a presentation on the topic by Kim Root, at its Monday,
September 9 board meeting.
Root, who gave the summary presentation of Patriot Services’
findings, said the final report of the assessments, which took place at
all district buildings during May and June, were received in August.
Patriot Services was chosen because it was locally owned and
operated; in addition, the firm had previously been contracted by the
district and has no association with any specific security products and
technologies, ensuring an unbiased assessment.
An overview of the findings was shared with instructional staff on the district’s opening day.
They include the fact that while all schools are successful in
limiting exterior doors used, “many unsecured doors go unmonitored for
extended periods.” Among the considerations suggested were the
installation of “a proximity access system on primary exterior doors,”
with a particular focus upon the main entrance and doors regularly used
for outdoor activities.
Patriot Services’ evaluation also suggested the district may wish to
install a video access system that would allow communication between the
person outside the door and those inside.
Weak points found during the assessment included areas such as
propped open doors in the district’s many buildings. Solutions suggested
include creating a district-wide policy to discourage this practice as
well as conducting refresher training and performing regular
walkthroughs to ensure it is being followed.
Another problem uncovered was that many of the exterior doors do not
close properly. Patriot Services therefore recommended inspecting each
one and adjusting so that they all will shut properly.
The question of visitor control also was raised in the assessment.
Report solutions include laminated, school-specific visitor badges that
include name, date and time and also to improve visitor accountability
by emphasizing the importance of visitors signing out before they leave
the school.
In addition to visitor badges, ID badges for staff can be
problematic. Many staff members were observed without their ID cards on
their persons. Reasons given included that the policy isn’t enforced as
well as safety concerns the lanyards pose while instructing special
education students. Root added as an aside that this was not a valid
concern, since clip-on badges that can be worn at waist level are
available to staff if they ask.
Patriot Services advised the district to “consider enforcing this
policy in all buildings and ensure staff members properly display ID
cards at all times,” again, suggesting that alternate means of wearing
IDs be made available to alleviate any safety concerns.
Additional suggestions included:
· Installing hardware on inter-connecting classroom doors that allows the securing of adjoining rooms from either side
· Creating policy requiring all classroom doors/window to remain secure when not in use
· Enforcing “no parking” policies (In particular, Root said, there is
an area at Milford High School near the loading dock where people park
and block it. “Ticketing and/or towing are options that we may
consider,” she added.
· Purchasing “go kits” for each classroom (consisting of a bag with
water, snacks, class list and anything else deemed necessary if have to
evacuate classroom, Root said.)
·
Improving key control, meaning that the district would issue fewer keys, only to those who really need them.
Considerations for the future might include reconstructing entrances
to all buildings to funnel visitors directly to main office;
constructing fencing around dumpsters, and installing protective
bollards to prevent damage to utilities.
Already in progress is a 120- day plan to, as Root said, “tackle the
low-hanging fruit. In other words, the district will immediately address
items that are no-cost or low-cost, such as ensuring all ceiling
hatches latch, automatic closing exterior doors, moving trash cans to
safer areas, where potentially hazardous items would not be located
right by school doors, making policy changes that improve safety,
engaging in employee training, employing consistent visitor badges
district wide, and RFPs for access control systems.
Scott Hiipakka, owner of Patriot Services in Commerce Township, said
he was glad to help assess where the district stands from a security
standpoint. As a parent of two students in the district, he applauds the
district making “an honest assessment” of its strengths and weaknesses.
Secretary Bonnie Brown wanted to know why the district could not
install an expandable intercom system that would allow all schools to
keep their doors shut now that also would allow the district to add on
to it later.
Hiipakka strongly advised against what he described as a “knee jerk response.”
“When we look at any technology, we need to make sure the system is
expandable,” he explained. “You don’t want a ‘band-aid.’ I would not
recommend you go with a temporary solution.”
The board will make further discussion of the system at its October board dialogue on October 7.
When asked by Vice President Rebecca Walsh, who ran the meeting due
to Board President Sean Carlson’s military commitment being served, if
he would be at that meeting, Hiipikka said he would be available as long
as they needed him that day.

Friday, September 6, 2013

It seems like some are a little late to the party. The term Liberal college professors is an oxymoron just like jumbo shrimp. What do you think it was like during the 1960's when they encouraged draft dodging or changing the new world order? College campuses have been very politically intolerant for generations if you are a Republican or conservative. Look at the faculty at MSU or any school and they have filled young people's ideas up with a liberal bent and it did not start with the rant of Evan Schrage in an MSU classroom. The major difference is the cellphone can record any conversation and be the equalizer for any professor that gives his/her opinion as fact. Anyone that has graduated from college knows about the liberal bent from reading the campus newspapers, listened to lectures going to debauchery parties and so on. I am not advocating being a conservative or liberal ( I think both parties are full of crap) and only care about themselves and the people that grease them, so my bent is not the article below will give you specific journalistic facts.

Student who recorded MSU professor's bash on Republicans comes forward

Evan Schrage's video of professor William Penn has gone viral

The Michigan State University student who recorded his professor telling the class that Republicans have "raped this country" has come forward.

Evan Schrage's video of professor William Penn has gone viral.

Penn told a creative writing class that Republicans are cheap. He said they don't want to pay taxes "because they have already raped this country and gotten everything out of it they possibly could."

He also said, "I am a college professor. If I find out you are a closet racist I am coming after you. Okay. This country is full of closet racists. What do you think is going on in South Carolina and North Carolina? Voter suppression. It is about getting black people not to vote. Why? Because black people tend to vote Democratic. So, why would Republicans want to do it? Because Republicans are not a majority of this country anymore. They are a bunch of dead white people. Or dying white people."

The video was first posted online by Campus Reform, a Virginia-based conservative group.

What if a student could not go to school for whatever reason and perhaps it is for a few weeks due to mono or surgery or whatever. Some companies and school districts are using robots in the classroom to do everything from record lectures to let the student participate in all of their classes depending on the situation. This video story shows that the future is now.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

The issue is a hot potato. You can think of reasons both ways and the tough part is whose right.I certainly understand students not wanting their school being a part of their business whether they use the devices during classroom hours or after but in the Channel One News piece, schools say they could save lives. http://www.channelone.com/daily-show/

The September 5th newscast story outlines the question and makes for a good classroom discussion..

In my mind, I actually side with the kids. Between parents and peers, it is best handled outside of school unless the message is communicated during the school day or affects school itself. At that point, bring in the appropriate school resources. Comment on whether you agree or disagree.