Sunday, August 31, 2014

BEHEADING: WHY ISLAM CHOSE THIS METHOD FOR DEATH SENTENCE?

Now why in the world did I arrive to this
totally untimely subject you may ask. Well I just have this funny feeling, that
many “Enlightened Beings” (EB) in Facebook will have this burning question every
time a Muslim tries to become an attorney to Islam. Common questions, “Why
does Islam resorts to inhumane method like beheading as a punishment for murder?”
I figured I will just post them here and direct a link every time an EB
has a question on it.

Of course they won’t question the Japanese
beheading, Hara-kiri, Seppuku or the early Christian practices in the 1st
Century but will be dying to shoot down Islam.

Beheading or decapitation is the separation
of the head from the body. This form of injury invariably results in death, as
severing the head deprives all other organs of the involuntary functions that
are essential for the body to function while the brain itself is deprived of
oxygenated blood.

Beheading or decapitation is killing another
human is already a basic fact today is an inhuman act. I can’t comprehend if
there is a “humane” way to justify taking another human’s life. To me one human
taking another human life is “inhumane” no matter what the reasons are although
it has been written as mandatory punishment for murder and Islam includes
“fitnah” (defamation). However some are accepted by the very humans whom made
it a law and legal to do so.

If so, what difference does it make in the
man-made (or God made) laws of what method is used to take one’s life, of which
is acceptable? Are the EB’s referring to the humane way of Thomas Jefferson, A
Life, the British punishment for treason was hanging until almost dead, lowered
& disemboweled, and hanged again until dead? Whether its Jefferson style,
old cowboy style shoot first ask later, push him off the cliff, disembowelment,
lethal injection, firing squad, hanging, electrocution or beheading - history
has shown man takes another’s life using “inhumane” method to create fear and
remorse. Most of which “legalized” via Supreme Court, Appeals Court, Magistrate
Court, Syariah Court either Barbaric laws, Roman, British laws, Islamic,
Catholic, Hudud, California or Mississippi state whatsoever.

Contrary the ignorant EB’s, cutting the head
from the body has long been used as a means of execution, whether extrajudicial
or state-sanctioned. For example, in the 1st Century Biblical
Apocrypha, a widow named Judith famously cuts off the head of an Assyrian
general named Holofernes, who had been laying siege to her town [source:
Vatican]. Civilizations throughout history have used beheadings as a means of
punishment. The Romans considered it a more “honorable means” of execution and
decidedly “less painful” than crucifixion, which it used to execute
non-citizens [source: Clark]. In Medieval Europe, beheading was used by the
ruling class to dispatch nobles and peasants alike. Eventually, most of the
world abandoned beheading as a form of capital punishment, viewing it as
barbaric and inhumane. That said, judicial beheading followed in the 6th
century Islam is legal today in the Middle Eastern states of Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Yemen and Iran [source: Weinberg].

The factors that have always made beheading
so brutal are the tools used in beheadings and the people who use those tools.
The axe and the sword have always been the favored implements of beheading, but
they can go blunt and are subject to the physical force exerted by the
executioner. Today, only Saudi Arabia uses the law and the headsman (executioners)
are highly trained in their jobs (some historical cultures allowed unskilled
workers to act as headsmen who performed beheadings). The result was that it
often took a number of blows to the neck and spine to sever the head from the
body, meaning a painful and torturous death.

The guillotine was introduced in the late
18th century as a humane alternative to beheading. Contrary to popular belief,
the instrument doesn't get its name from its inventor; in actuality, surgeon
Antoine Louis invented the guillotine. The machine's namesake, Joseph-Ignace Guillotin,
was a physician who called for a humane means of dispatching the convicted and
championed the device that now bears his name. With the invention of the
guillotine, executions could be carried out more efficiently and
post-Revolutionary France officially adopted the contraption in 1792. This
major increase in efficiency led to the Reign of Terror in France, in which
more than 30,000 people suffered the guillotine in one year alone [source:
McCannon]. France used the guillotine for state-sanctioned executions until it
removed the last head in 1977.

Saudi Arabia however uses a high strength steel
curved sword. The sword is a symbol of serious craftsmanship and is owned by
the headsman (executioner) himself. It is extremely sharp and the headsman
makes a quick stroke from shoulder high to induce a clean swift severe. Contrary
to the image of the procedure, it leaves a profound impact on others to even
think about committing murder and “fitnah”. If the headsman's sword was sharp
and his aim was precise, decapitation was quick it will be relatively painless
form of death and suffering.

To apply a humane or inhumane method, the
answer to the EB’s can best be purged out from their own ego, when their loved
ones, daughters are raped and brutally murdered, would they be able to plug
their head out of their @$$ of hypocrisy and arrive to a conclusion of what
humane punishment would it be “justifiable” to them to choose hanging, lethal
injection or beheading.

Apart from the Hudud law practiced by Saudi
Arabia, two versus in the Quran does mention method of killing referring to the
Battle of Batr, circa 650AD,

“So when you meet those who disbelieve [in
battle], strike [the enemy] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon
them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom
[them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah
had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered
armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are
killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds”. – QS
47:4

Pro American Syrian Militant beheading a Syrian civilian watched by U.S. Soldier.

I have mentioned that in Islam that “fitnah”
(defamation) is considered worse than murder and the punishment is beheading. This
punishment however is not practiced in any nation today. There has been
unverified reports that the ISIS was carrying beheading of Syrian militants turncoats
working with U.S. in defaming Syrian military for using chemical weapons. The
photos of the beheading was later circulated by Christian extremists to be the
beheading of Christian Iraqis. They later changed the report to say it was the
beheading of Yazidis. The reports has yet to be verified, or having heard from
someone with firsthand knowledge and no evidence and no eyewitnesses or
journalists have been able to corroborate the story.

“And kill them wherever you overtake them and
expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than
killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you
there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the
disbelievers.” QS 2:191

Despite having the mental faculties to look
at the big picture, EB’s particularly the Malaysian “Mat Salleh celups”, racist
dumb fcks continue to harp on the religion factor, as if they have a birth
right having moral high ground for just being American speaking Christian to be
eligible as a “moral
prosecutor” of Islam. Not realizing they are the exact morons the CIA
needs to propagate
their agenda.

NOTE: For EB’s whom are not satisfied, whom
seek further clarification on the 72
Virgins, “Allah’u Ahkbar” or Prophet Muhammad’s (pbuh) marriage to a 9
year old Aisha, please
click here.