No, it's ABCnews failing at making scientific polls yet again. If you want legitimate results and want to be seen as a legitimate news source, you need to learn how to make good polls and good options. That is to say, if it's a "yes" or "no" question, just give "yes" or "no" options and let us put our own reasons in the comments. Not "Yes because I want info" or "No because it's scary".

already have...it has helped to determine there was no known hereditary link to the cause of our 2 disabled children...and that our oldest healthy son and his wife would have the same risk for as anyone else....in some ways less risk as certain genetic problems were eliminated as possible due to the knowing of personal genetic issues....they now are proud parents of a healthy son and a healthy daughter.
It also enabled my husband and I, 19 years ago to decide intelligently with needed info versus just emotionally deciding whether we should have more children...after the 2 with disabilities. We had another healthy son....There was never a question that we could not love a child with disabilities....but we knew that we would not purposely have children that would have more challenging lives and would adopt should it be revealed that we would have a great risk for this happening.
Knowledge is power....not a lack of trust or commitment.

Actually, I am aware of the fact that I lost a lot of aunts and uncles to heart disease and diabetes . . . I really know that. Plus, my maternal grandmother died a double-amputee; falling victim to Diabetes. I am more concerned about the health of my two surviving children and their kids too . . . I lost one daughter to a brain tumor and my wife died from Heart Disease. Let's understand too that there are so many cases where the gene is carried but it is finally proven to be irrelevant . . . But then, again, I could be diagnosed next week as "The Probable Next One To Go" . . .

Yes but I would fly to a foreign country and have it done out of pocket. There is a strict limit on my trust for the increasingly corrupt interconnection between the govt, insurance and medical providers.

What is scary is that ABCnews.com would in anyway allow it's name to be associated with a question, a so called "poll" as horrifically unscientific and weighted as this one. My only options are "Yes. I want any info I can get" and "No... it's scary?" What does ABC news think it's getting here? If they are interested in the comments I guess but why not more poll options?

Not only would I, but I did. Before I started going out on dates to get married, I got myself checked for Tay-Sachs. It was negative, but had it been positive, I would have been able to filter out candidates for the honor of being my wife.