Pedders, can’t argue anything. Pedders, built like a 12 year old lesbian. Pedders, acts all indignant and shocked about debatable points so he doesn’t have to engage and reveal how little he actually knows about boxing.
Pedders is Pedders.

Dealt With has a long documented history of being spot on about Lomachenko, while clowning and proving Pedders wrong.

DKSAB

Pedders, can’t argue anything. Pedders, built like a 12 year old lesbian. Pedders, acts all indignant and shocked about debatable points so he doesn’t have to engage and reveal how little he actually knows about boxing.
Pedders is Pedders.

Dealt With has a long documented history of being spot on about Lomachenko, while clowning and proving Pedders wrong.

DKSAB

The revisionist history here is hilarious. Was anybody here watching boxing when Pac was coming up? He was always seen as a limited but exciting fighter, who likely had a short shelf life because of the way he fought. It wasn’t until the DLH, Hatton, Cotto fights that he was thought about as an all time great. And we’re going to sit here and pretend that Pac was a master boxer? He was always criticised for his straight line boxing, his limited arsenal of punches, his lack of a right hand, and how many punches he took. Even us who didn’t like Floyd knew he would always beat Pac due to his style, due to his counter punching.
Now we want to pretend that he is on Lomachenko’s level as a boxer? Hilarious, and dweeb Pedders agenda is clear as always. Suck off anybody from the past, idealise them as an untouchable religious figure, while downplaying clearly the most skilled boxer to ever have lived.

Pedders, can’t argue anything. Pedders, built like a 12 year old lesbian. Pedders, acts all indignant and shocked about debatable points so he doesn’t have to engage and reveal how little he actually knows about boxing.
Pedders is Pedders.

Dealt With has a long documented history of being spot on about Lomachenko, while clowning and proving Pedders wrong.

Linares losing, in any way barring a Freak accident or blatant robbery, which neither of those were, against scrubs like Demarco and Thompson is quite alarming to say the least. Especially for a so called “elite fighter”.

I never said he hits harder than Pacquiao, are argument was that he was more skillfully sound. Loma's shots are a mix of pitty pats in between harder shots. My beef is the downplay of what he's done so far in under 15 fights, the easier he puts someone away the more we take away from him.

Linares losing, in any way barring a Freak accident or blatant robbery, which neither of those were, against scrubs like Demarco and Thompson is quite alarming to say the least. Especially for a so called “elite fighter”.

Manny knocked out Hatton who was a 140 pound fighter. What full fledged Welterweights did he knock out? He generally stopped bigger guys due to an accumulation of damage. Lomachenko knocked out better fighters at 130 and 135 so to claim that it’s not even a maybe that Lomachenko might hit harder just shows your ridiculous bias.

Stop looking at numbers you imbecile. I know how he was regarded at the time, I watched him as he moved up and I was a fan. Nobody ever thought he was some unbeatable, ultra skilled fighter. The general consensus was that he was limited boxing wise but was special in terms of offensive output with very good power, and that he was in entertaining fights. You’re making the claim that he’s some Uber-skilled boxer when the view was always that his athleticism and power helped him to win some close decisions against his more skilled contemporaries at the time.
He started to appear more skilled when he moved up and fought bigger, slower guys. It was the DLH fight that put Pac into the elite category, and we know what DLH’s condition was for that fight. I admit that I picked DLH at the time. It was that fight, Hatton, Cotto and Margarito that put him into the view that we have of him now. At the lower weights he wasn’t considered ATG and a skilled boxer. He was nothing close to the level of Lomachenko, and you saying otherwise is either your bs bias or you simply didn’t watch boxing at the time.

Go to page

Go to page

About us

Our community has been around for many years and pride ourselves on offering unbiased, critical discussion among people of all different backgrounds. We are working every day to make sure our community is one of the best.