Comments on: Our Viewpointhttp://www.ridenbaugh.com
from our writersTue, 07 Jul 2015 04:53:06 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.3By: John L. Runfthttp://www.ridenbaugh.com/index.php/our-stance/comment-page-1/#comment-24756
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:34:03 +0000http://www.ridenbaugh.com/index.php/our-stance/#comment-24756In re Barrett Rainey’s “American Democracy is Drowning in a Sea of Money, let me suggest that the solution is not to blame SCOTUS’s decision Citzens United and call for more repressive regulations. The decision is sound and complies with your above “Our Stance” # 7 regarding freedom. As you imply in # 7, the corollary to freedom is responsibility. The rationale of the decision is correct, as the Court explained, on grounds of individual freedom. Now, the next step which appertains to individual responsibility needs to take place to create the balance reflected in # 7. That next step could possibly be accomplished by bringing suit against one of the PACs on the ground that it cannot qualify for immunity, because of its inherent anonymity, as a “public persona” under the N.Y. Times v,. Sullivan doctrine. Subjecting the PACs and their contributors liability for their slanders will solve much of the problem (similar to Great Britain where there is no N.Y. Times v,. Sullivan doctrine – although there are other problems in the reverse in G.B). Regrets for the foregoing ” 30 sec. shorthand.” John L. Runft
]]>