There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt, this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 26th of March 2009.

I advise newcomers
to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the website, you can download
hundreds of hours of talks I've given in the past, where I try to show you the
big picture of the system that runs this world. There's one continuous system
at the top, they have an agenda, they know where they're going and they have to
get the consent of the public all along the way. They keep giving us New Deals,
New Deal Mark 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and we're coming up to the next New Deal, where we
must consent to our own depopulation and voluntary sterility, basically, when
to get little snips done here and there. To sustain the planet, you understand
and all of this utter nonsense, but it's been put over to the public in such a
massive way of indoctrination, over many years, they're pretty confident they
can get them to go along with it. And, sure enough, the public seldom really
retaliate and complain about anything, unless their television breaks down or
something like that, or the costs of their cable TV goes up; that's the sad
truth of things.

Also, look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of the talks I give, which you can print up, they're
written in the various languages of Europe.

You can also go
into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and buy that which I have for sale
there, that keeps me going; or, you can donate to me, there's a donate button
on the site. And I should say that I'm only here as long as you want me here,
when the cash dries up, I'm out of commission as well, because it costs money
to do what I'm doing. I pay for satellite because I live in the country, they
can't get cable piped into here, it's over a $100 a month for this shitty
service that I get from a very well known military-industrial complex that owns
the satellite and shares it with the peasants down below. So, it's up to you to
keep me going, because, believe you me, and I’ve said this years ago, the only
reason I came out into the public was to try and do something, although I
thought it was pretty futile at the time, I wasn't even sure people were
willing to listen or even comprehend that which I had to say, because I spent years
studying this agenda. Growing up, I made full use of the libraries around me,
full use; and I was astonished to find, sure enough, there is an agenda,
there's always been an agenda, there's always been, as Aldous Huxley said, a
dominant minority, and, as he said in his speech at Berkeley, I don't
see why there won't always be a dominant minority ruling the people. Well,
this dominant minority is the only thoroughly organised association on the
planet. It doesn't really see any opposition anywhere. They wrote copiously
about the Marxist system, because they helped set up the Marxist system, as the
big-big / huge experiment. And they said it would work because, once again,
they set up a system that was in that area of the world, that region, the only
organised system available to the people.

We have many
apparent opposition parties and groups to what's happening in the world today;
but, really, many of them are part of what the elite want to bring in. The
upcoming demonstrations will have the greenies there of all kinds and the ones
for sustainable development, the ones that want green and equality etc etc
across the world; and they always use the young to do it because the young are
idealistic. They know how to use idealism, the young see things in black and
white, there are no shades of grey; they have no wisdom to fall back on. They
don't realise that what they're demanding from the elite, the same elite who
have given us wars, world wars and all the other wars and depressions, will
just give them a new deal. So why would you ask the shark to help you out this
time? It won't work, you'll ask for what they want to give you ultimately
anyway.

I'll be back with
more - after this break - on more on this topic, it's a very important
topic.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt, this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I try to give you the histories of
the big system, the organised system that includes the bankers who put the
politicians in place, that use Foundations and NGOs and front groups, to get
their way in the world. They fund all universities and then when they fund
universities, they also put out little handouts to the Deans to tell them what
they'd like to have studied in the universities and what they'd like to have
omitted, there's always a catch you see to everything they do for the public,
there's always a catch that’s for their own benefit, not for the public's. And
down through history, as I say, we've been given New Deals, we're given
new deals, supposedly, when Britain got a Parliament together, that's a New
Deal, even though you had to be a land-owner to vote at that time. That held
steady for an awful long time, in fact, up until World War I when they gave the
ordinary people the vote; but they never decided, at all, to allow the public
to guide the course of the country, or the world, for that matter. Because,
democracy, of course, would take the power away from those who held it; power
never ever gives itself up, never, never ever abdicates.

Before they even
gave the vote to the ordinary people in Britain, for instance, you had the
Cecil Rhodes Foundation and the Darwinists, all one big group in fact, all
intertwined / inter-married, who set up a system to bypass any idea of the
coming democracy that would be used to fool the people. We have front
organisations we call governments; if governments were there for the people,
you wouldn't have them going into Congress or Parliament and voting with the
party, against their own constituents. So, why have politicians who must vote
with the party and not for their constituents, what's the point in having them?
Democracy is supposed to be when the politician goes off to the main meeting
hall, or his Upsala, as they used to call it and speaks on your behalf, it
doesn't happen. 'Well, I'm sorry constituents, I have to vote with the party',
so you don’t have that, we never did really have it in fact. And Margaret
Thatcher, I've gone over this many times, gave talks on this in her New World
Order speeches, including the one she gave at Massey Hall in Toronto, in the
'90s, early '90s on the coming New World Order, where she said that "I
belong to a parallel government". A parallel government that was made up
of ex politicians, the heads of state, high level bureaucrats who’d left
government positions and she said that we get the jobs done, whereas democracy
can't, it's too cumbersome, with all the haggling that goes on in the Houses,
the big political houses; and there are too many competing interests etc,
therefore they have their agenda. Now, what agenda are they talking about?
Remember, the whole idea of free-trade was based in England in Queen Elizabeth
the 1st's era; and all around Queen Elizabeth the 1st you had this openly
Rosicrucian Order. Francis Bacon joined, all these boys, Francis Drake, Raleigh
etc; and they came up with the idea of a British Empire that would expand into
the world and the world would copy this system, governmental system and come
into an order of free-trade, free-trade, in the 1500s. Out of that one Court,
they gave birth to the first giant corporation, international, which was the
British East India Company and the East India Company also went into countries
and through gradualism and bringing envoys with them, from England, they would
try and get a similar system, an appendage, if you like, of Britain's set up in
that country; free-trade. They even came up with term 'Most favoured Nation'
trading status, the one they gave China only a few years ago.

We're living
through a vast plan, by people who came out, in the time of Darwin, and
admitted that they believed that they were physically, mentally, biologically
superior and that Darwin had proven their point, something they'd always known
they said, in their own writings on eugenics, that they, obviously, had evolved
more than the peasants down below. You find Mr. Rockefeller and all these
characters are all part of this one big clan that finance the NGOs and the
Foundations and the universities and the media and all education, to get us to
go along with their big plan. Their plan has a timetable, like a long-term
business plan, implementation dates for certain things. Now, these same people
came out with the conspiracy theorists, to ridicule those who follow what they
print and publish. They slap 'conspiracy theorist' on you. They also put out
red herrings, people who come out and mix the truth with utter nonsense, sci-fi
nonsense, to discredit the truth; that's called counter-intelligence. They have
published so much about their intentions and there's never been a time when they're
on a roll as today, as they roll out the next part of their agenda.

Now remember, this
twenty-first century, as they said in the last century, was to be a century of
change; and they gave the mantras to Obama and different ones too: 'change is
good' 'change is good' rah-rah-rah like a parrot. Slogans win for them you see,
repetition and slogans.

What do they want?
They want a world where their sciences, which they own and control, will bring
in a new population eventually, down the road, they’ve published all this stuff
in all the science magazines, of enhanced beings that will serve them better.
However, they want a really reduced population, because, after all, they don't
like extra livestock around that aren't being of any use to them, they're not
producing. The Western world has gone past that great transition from
industrial-technological to a service economy. These boys at the top are like
the lord farmers, the old lord farmers that had all the tenant farmers down
below them; and there's simply too much livestock around for their liking. We
get in the way, we're untidy across the landscape; and therefore, they must
convince us all that we are the problem and they've done a darn good job so
far. Ordinary people now will chat to each other about 'well I guess they're
right, there's too many of us'. These people all live in cities, where
unlimited immigration has been bulging their seams out for years, to make them
believe that they're overcrowded. While the United Nations, that's a front
group for this big dominant minority, publish every year that the Western
families and offspring have been reduced, for years and years and years. We're
not replacing ourselves; and that's the reason they give for the immigration:
we've got to bring in people to pay off the debt. Since the debt keeps
accumulating, because it's planned to, how could you ever pay it off? It's not
intended to, they're going to bring in a new system but first they must get
everyone rioting and complaining to them, especially the young, who've already
had about ten years of indoctrination into the greening agenda and
sustainability. At the end of it all, when we're all war weary and battle torn,
they'll unroll another New Deal, which is the one that they'd probably written
fifty-odd, sixty years ago, shake the dust off it and present it to the public.
We'll breathe a sigh of relief and be good willing servants. That's how they
plan to do it.

From the BBC,
today, March 26th 2009, it says:

Population growth 'unsustainable'

Now, this is a
handout to the BBC that, again, is owned by the British Government remember.
There used to be so many complaints about the BBC because they didn't hire
anyone that wasn't from Eton, to make sure their own class ran it you see; and
it's funded from the government by tax payers’ money. It's a propaganda outfit,
for the agenda; and I mentioned a few days ago, that the Optimum Population
Trust, which is a private front group for the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds,
the Carnegie, Ford, etc, all these Foundations. I mentioned how their boss,
their boss man, who will shortly be a lord himself (they inherit their titles
from their daddies, good old superior papa) and who is Prince Charles' green
advisor by the way, who runs this Optimum Population Trust. They've now given
out their handout, their official handout, at the same time as other handouts
are coming, that's how they do it, everything happens at the same time, they
give you a little bit of preparation, because we adapt so fast to ideas and
then they come out with the whole thing; and we swallow it all, bean by bean
basically.

The Optimum Population Trust is holding a conference on how population
growth will affect climate change, with a leading environmentalist, Dr Martin
Desvaux warning that the UK will be unable to reach its carbon emission
reduction targets whilst sustaining its population.

Now remember: this
is the same BBC that called for halving the population of Britain last week. It
had to be done.

Correspondent Caroline Duffield reports from Lagos, Nigeria on the
problems caused by a rapidly growing population, while correspondent James
Rodgers reports from Moscow, where the population is shrinking. Professor John
Guillebaud, professor of family planning

at UCL, discusses how population growth can be brought down without
infringing on people's right to reproduce.

How can they bring
down the population "without infringing on people's right to
reproduce"? Well, they've got to convince you to do it voluntarily, that's
all there is to it, quite simple, isn't it? And you should go through that
particular article, look into the Optimum Population Trust and Mr. Porritt,
soon to be lord Porritt, when good old papa goes to his final superior resting
place. And we find, as I say, it all comes out at the same time.

CNN politics.com
March 25th 2009 - this is a beauty! It's on their page called political-ticker.
I'll read this, it's really astonishing and yet not astonishing.

Back in a moment-
after these messages.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, showing you how the boys at the top
plan their agenda, while they make us all believe in the accidental view of
history: accidents just happen; crashes just happen, no one can foresee them
and so on and so on, as they guide us along to the new system. It's a world
system of world service, where money eventually will be supplanted really, or
replaced with tokens of some kind or another, then that'll be done away with
altogether when we're so happy to be born into a world to serve the big green
planet in which we, I don't know if you can call it live, but exist.

I talked about the
Optimum Population Trust, a massive organisation again, funded by the big
Foundations at the top and the Royal Institute of International Affairs and all
these big boys at the top, all these lords know each other; and they're all
part of the pyramid structure that controls our lives and guides us with our
thoughts and where we're all going. And these guys will never, you cannot, you
cannot negotiate with these guys; I hope people realise that that go to London.
There's no negotiations with people who are ruthless, who come from ruthless
families, going back centuries; and who will always come out at the end and
give you the new deal, while the same ruthless guys are in control of it, what
do expect will keep happening? The same thing, obviously. Back to what I’m saying here, how this ties
in with the Optimum Population Trust:

Planned Parenthood to honor Hillary Clinton

cnnpolitics.com March 25th

Planned Parenthood Federation of America will hold a gala honoring
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Friday in Houston, Texas. The health care
provider

Did you know it was
a 'health care provider', that's what it was, Planned Parenthood? Look
into the history folks of what Planned Parenthood is and who set it up. So,
it's a “health care provider”.

announced it will host the awards and dinner ceremony in the Lone Star
State to pay tribute to those who have made significant contributions to the
advancement of women's reproductive health and rights and promotion of family
planning and prevention efforts.

Clinton is set to receive PPFA's highest honor, the Margaret Sanger
award,

Who was Margaret
Sanger? She was the one who set it up; she was a top eugenicist, Fabianist. She
loved Adolf Hitler and his policies, for getting rid of the weak and infirm and
those who are below par mentally. She loved Lenin, she loved Stalin, she loved
all of these people, because Socialism was up her alley. Socialism is the
technique they use for all of this you see - you're just a creature, they can
manipulate you forever and ever. You are the clay; they can keep remoulding you
into the perfect being, to serve them, that is. So, she can get the Margaret
Sanger award. Doesn’t that make you feel better the Secretary of State is a
believer in Margaret Sanger and all her policies of getting rid of all the
weak, the elderly, the infirm and those that they claimed were below par in a
few gene areas. Eugenics is out in the open today, out in the open, in your
face; but you have a dumbed-down public who live on trivia and that's why they
can put it in your face. As I say, everything ties in together, everything is
tied in together.

Now, the Mail
online, and I use this as an example of how psychology is used in the media, to
the extent that most folk are unaware of, in fact. The British papers are
really the prototype for the planet; everything that happens in fact in Britain
is done world-wide, after it's been tested in Britain; and the newspapers
across the planet are emulating the British style, because it's down to a
perfected state. From the mail online, it says:

G20 rioters

They're calling
them rioters, before they riot, you see.

to hang banker effigies from lampposts as city staff are told to wear
disguises

This is from the
Daily Mail, 26th March 2009. It says

City workers are being urged to stay at home or to dress down

In other words:
dress like a commoner.

during next week's G20 summit to avoid being targeted by anti-capitalist
protesters.

So now, you see,
they're anti-capitalist protesters. I think, last week, the same newspapers had
other phrases that they used for them, this week it's anti-capitalist
protesters. They’re already telling us what to think of the coming protesters,
that's how it's done. It says:

Unprecedented measures are being put in place to prepare for thousands
of demonstrators targeting the City

That's the
sovereign city of London, it says "the city"

and Canary Wharf. About 3,000 anti-capitalist

Here's repetition
again.

About 3,000 anti-capitalist protesters are expected, with groups next
Wednesday marching to the Bank of England, holding

And they don't have
camping anymore, they used to call them camps, now the media's calling them
like the 'flashmobs'

'flashcamps'

'flashcamps' oh,
they're going to hold 'flashcamps'

outside the European Climate Exchange in Bishopsgate,

I didn't even know
we had one, a European Climate Exchange, I didn't know it was in
England.

and marching on the US Embassy. Demonstrators have vowed to hang
effigies of bankers from lampposts along the protest route.

He probably threw a
brick through it himself. I'll read more on this, after these messages, because
there's a lot more to it, what's coming up; and the protesters should know
what's going on, so should the public, back in a moment, after this
break.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt and
this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Mail Online, to
do with the upcoming - what they're claiming here are - riots. They don't even
bother to call it demonstrations; no, it's "riots - by anti
capitalists". Last week, they said they were all anarchists. You know the
Mail Online and all the newspapers in Britain are owned by members, generally
lords, of the CFR, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, same thing you
see. Because, knowledge is power and they've never ever allowed the major power
out of their hands, never; therefore, they give hand-outs to these papers who
just print them, print them up, willingly, because that's their job. And they
demonise, you see, those they want to demonise and stigmatise those they want
to stigmatise; and elevate those they want to elevate. So, the bankers are
great boys you see, they’ve ripped us off I can't remember how many times in my
life, or my parents’ or my grandparents' times, just so many times that you
just can't count them; they're good guys, good guys at the top. And all those
who oppose them, after getting ripped off, are "anti capitalist" /
anarchists, supposedly, according to this article here. It says:

An extra 2,500 police, including riot units and intelligence officers,
are being deployed at a cost of £10 million to tackle any violence, while
security consultants are giving firms constant updates on threat
levels.

There's Fascism
right there: security consultants, they must be into everybody's data you see,
private organisations, working with Government and the Law.

The demonstrations, as 20 world leaders meet at the ExCeL Centre in
Docklands to discuss how to end the world recession,

This is what it's
all about: how to end the world recession, this big accident that just
happened

are expected to be the biggest in London this decade.

Remember now, I've
read the articles in the recent past about the Military's Think-tank in Britain
and the one for the US, have come out with identical massive papers on the
future, for the next 50 years. They want thirty years of rioting, apparently,
in those particular documents, that's what they foresee, so you're going to see
the start of it. How do you kick it off? Well you collapse the economy and
screw the people, again; that's how you start it off; simple, all techniques
have been used before. It says:

One warns: 'The front door is to be permanently locked during these two
days.'

This is
companies.

The London Chamber of Commerce have warned businesses to take security
precautions, including making sure staff carry ID, keep movement in and out of
the offices to a minimum and cancelling all but essential meetings.

That's when these
big fat fellers run off to see their call-girls.

Colin Stanbridge, chief executive of the LCCI, said: 'There will be
concern among businesses at the protests but the vast majority of firms will
have robust security

The private
security firms are all run by ex SAS guys and MI5 and MI6 guys, are just
booming these days, great business.

The financial advisory group Bluefin, which employs 500 staff in London-has
told employees not to go to its office in Mark Lane in the City unless
absolutely necessary. A spokesman for the bank UBS said: 'We are telling people
to be cautious. If you have client meetings do you need to have them
here?"

Now, who, who lead
the young down through the years? Now, remember Bertrand Russell, in a book
about him in fact, written for him, has photographs of him at what they called
the Committee of 100, these were the real vanguards of the peace leagues / the
anti-bomb leagues. He ran these groups; now Lord Bertrand Russell also was a
eugenicist who believed and worked for these boys at the top. His job was to go
out into the world and get everyone behind him, to create a fake anti-war
movement, that they really would believe in it, all the followers really
believed in it; so that the public who watched these demonstrations on their TV
would live in horror they were going to get nuked at any minute, keeping you in
constant fear, that was the idea of the Cold War, apart from making high-tech
advances with unlimited tax money from the people, to make more chains for the
future. We're seeing it all come out now, with security etc etc watching
everything that we do.

They always give
you the opposition, but they also use university leaders, professors, to get
the young up and going. Now, who's leading one of these groups?

Chris Knight, professor of anthropology

Those guys who
believe in evolution

at the University of East London, is organising protests under the
banner G20 Meltdown.

That's one group
that's going. He also is a member of what they call Radical Anthropologists,
they've got a whole new theory on Anthropology and how vocabulary itself and
changes in language advance social causes and literally are sort of evolutions
in themselves. I have a different opinion: I believe they're created by those
who know how to create them, because civilisation and knowledge is very-very
ancient and well-studied. It says; this is what Chris said:

'We are going to be hanging a lot of people like Fred the Shred

That's Sir Fred who
got the massive bonus after collapsing his bank.

from lampposts and I can only say let's hope they are just effigies. If
he winds us up any more I'm afraid there will be real bankers hanging from
lampposts.' Meanwhile, the group claiming responsibility for vandalising the
former Royal Bank of Scotland chairman's home has threatened further action
against 'criminal' bank bosses. A statement claiming to be from the group
responsible for damage at his £3 million mansion

That's nowhere near
his bonus there.

warned of further attacks, saying: 'This is just the beginning.' The
threat sparked fears of a terror campaign against those blamed for the collapse
in the financial system.

Then it goes on and
on and on, about how terrible it was to poor old Sir Fred. He lost a window.
People have been losing their homes, all over the planet. Poor Sir Fred, poor
Sir Fred, I'm sure he's well insured. He probably also owns the insurance
company.

We'll go to Kyle
from Connecticut on the phones, if he's there, is Kyle there?

Kyle: Hi
Alan.

Alan:
Hello.

Kyle: It's funny
everybody out here protesting the AIG execs at their mansions who are getting,
you know, a couple of million but they don't realise that there's big fish out
there to fry.

Alan: There's
bigger fish and here's the thing too: and I keep mentioning this little phrase
that was put out in New York during the Civil War, when they had the riots in
New York, the Tammany riots, where the Mayor said We can always hire half
the poor to kill the other half. Today they would say half the lower
classes to kill the other half of the lower classes; and what you'll always see
is the people at the bottom, who think they're middle class, and they're mainly
at universities and so on, clash with the hired cops who all come from the
working class themselves, while the boys in the ivory towers stand way high
above it all, looking down on it, with their grin and holding their brandy and
saying everything's going to plan, as always. You see, it's pointless to take
your aggression out on paid thugs, and that's really what today's military
police are; they're paid thugs, they're now contaminated with their
indoctrination, they've had ten years of intense indoctrination, that's made
them ultra paranoid about the public; and they see themselves as a fraternity,
they use military tactics to bond them together and so they will be utterly
ruthless upon the same public that goes for them. So, you have people at the
bottom squabbling with people at the bottom and they never go to the ones who
cause the problem in the first place.

Kyle: I know and
that was a good lesson you taught.

Alan: Yes, and
that's the problem with all of this, because the same ones at the top, they did
the same thing with the Great Depression, they pulled out FDR, out of Wall
Street, so they put a bankers' man in, to give us a 'New Deal' and here they
are, again, they're all waiting to give the public a New Deal. Bush, remember,
used the same term 'Here's the New Deal'.
They keep giving us, the same people, who use us like slaves, tax us to
the hilt, let us accumulate and then they plunder us every fifty years or so,
are going to give us another New Deal, after all these riots. It'll be coupled
with sustainability, the greening of the planet and that'll bring in population
reduction and we'll all say oh good, the riots are all over and you don't
realise they got exactly what they wanted at the top and they'll have a world
of service, a world of service, where we're here to serve the world economy and
the world economic system and the planet. However, in reality, we'll be like
the peasants of Russia, who went through the Revolution and will end up working
in the fields, for the elite, as usual. It's the same old thing: you can't go
to the killer shark and negotiate, because these guys have declared all out
war: biological, through your food, through your water, through inoculations,
on the general public a long time ago, they're utterly ruthless. And they can
hire as many thugs at the bottom to crash your skulls in; I hope people realise
that. War has been declared upon the people, by people who are absolutely
resolute in their agenda, utterly resolute in their agenda, there's no
negotiations with these characters at the top. They are not going to change
their agenda because we ask them nicely to do it.

Kyle: No and
they're really slick too.

Alan: Very
slick.

Kyle: They're
pushing the fair tax again.

Alan: A fair
tax!!

Kyle: A 23%
national sales tax and they claim they're going to abolish the IRS and the
income tax but, if they don't within 7 years, then they could get rid of the
national sales tax. So, it's perfect for them, to have a 7 year period to just
get rid of the baby boomers. And they're done paying their income tax, so
they're just going to pay sales tax.

Alan: There'll be
sales tax and then they'll phase in the individual carbon taxes that go to the
world government that'll be up and pretty well running by then.

Kyle: It's funny
the acronym WHO, the World Health Organisation.

Alan: Dr. Who I
call them! The time lords is their big joke because they rule the world
inter-generationally for centuries, so they're the time lords, Dr. Who.

Kyle: I look
forward to watching your time DVD where you explain some things about
that.

Alan: Oh they love
their jokes that are put out to the public in movies and television series and
so on. They do love their jokes because they truly believe they're so superior
and the reason is because they've always got what they wanted. They don't leave
anything to chance and, believe you me, they will lead any of what people think
are revolutions, they'll make sure that they have the leaders for it, who will
come to terms with exactly what the elite want them to come to terms with; and
everyone will go back home thinking 'good, we've won' - no, they haven't won,
they'll be into the new system, the next New Deal, which is exactly what elite
wanted in the first place.

Kyle: That's what I
see happening right now, this change; and I was driving myself crazy reading UN
documents and all their resolutions that are the problem here and the problem
there and you know their terms are just amazing: "trade distorting
domestic support"!

Alan: Ha-ha!

Kyle: I read that
one today,

Alan: Yes, they
love their terms and all the rest of it but everything, everything we read
that’s put out for us to read is predictive programming, so that we will -
subconsciously - adapt our ideas towards what they want us to adapt to, without
really reasoning it out for ourselves; and that's the technique of massive
control and psychology. In fact, getting back to that article I was reading,
from the Mail online, I was going to mention how it's laid out. The paper is
laid out, standard Britain, here's your main story that could just as well have
been the slaughter at Gaza, with the world's fourth largest military bombing
these peasants. However, on the right hand side, here's what they give the
women: they give the women all the movie stars and what's happening to them,
all these women you know:

'35 year old's recovery hampered by North Pole jaunt';

'Madonna prepares to fly to Malawi'.

They don't want
women involved in what's happening; and it's so black and white here: here's
the main story on the left and the guys will read that; women will
automatically look into all this trivia that's put out there, hoping to divert
them, because the last thing they want, the last thing they want are angry
women, or mothers, having their photographs taken in the streets because that
automatically wins public support when women and children are involved. So,
they divert the women into:

'Kitty Hopkins how I cost my married lovers £3 million'

This is next to the
main story in the newspaper. Or, how this film star:

'No gourmet sex please'

blah blah

'Lucy Cavandish says she's satisfied by Tesco's value added cuddles and
a quickie and it doesn't leave her exhausted'

And there's she's
in bed with a guy. This is how they psychologically lay out the media, to get
the guys to watch this stuff, as they give you the wording
"anarchist", "anti-capitalist"; and on the right hand side,
they want to divert the women off into that, they don't want the women coming
out and demanding their rights. It is so perfect, psychology is used in everything
that you look at; and the people have grown up with this, thinking its all
normal, they don't even realise why it's laid out that way!

Kyle: I could see
it in most news that I watch, they repeat the same thing over and over again.
As you say, eight times; and you believe it.

Alan: Yes, and what
you'll find is that after the news, they'll go off to a talk by experts on that
topic, who will, again, use the same terms; and then, later on in the night,
they get another series on, more experts using the same terms again, as though
they're all unrelated, but in fact that's predictive programming, getting you
used to the terms, eight times minimum, until we start to parrot them
ourselves. It's all psychology.

Kyle: I mean the
letters themselves, in your writings I see just, it's all distorted.

Alan: Yes. It is,
but they do love, as I say, their little codes, their little laughs and the
language is full of codes and that's also what I write about as well. They've
been at this for a long-long time. They created the English language, about the
1500s, they brought out the King James Bible at the same time, to introduce it
and all the Shakespearian plays. The modern dictionaries will tell you that
they owe about 180,000 words to Shakespeare, this busy-busy scribbler!

Kyle: I think
that's why they have such a problem with the Greeks and people that actually
know the meanings of words.

Alan: Yes, well,
again George Orwell came out with it very well, he said (in '1984') that the
dictionary will be very-very thin, it gets thinner every year, as they take
words out of the dictionary and you're left with linguistic minimalism, to the
extent that there can be no terror and no terrorists out there in society,
when, basically, you don't have the words to convey your thoughts. That
literally was the goal in '1984', with the dictionary.

Kyle: The memory
hole.

Alan: Yes, and so
we see it happening today with the songs, the rap and all the rest: minimalism,
linguistic minimalism, until people can't even convey properly a thought or
definitely philosophies; and if you want to riot about something, you must have
a philosophy to go by that has an outcome and a direction. They don't have
that, except for the ones they've been given, to do with greening and sustainability
and equality across the world and all that stuff.

Kyle: What do you
think about Timothy Leary's beliefs, I mean, he sounded similar to
Socrates.

Alan: Timothy
Leary, it was admitted a few years ago, Timothy Leary was employed by the
CIA.

Kyle: Just to hand
out acid and get everybody

Alan: His job was
to get the youngsters into the drugs; now, remember, the guys at the top, look
into the history of the Skull and Bones Society and all those boys at Yale
University, they all made their big pile of loot putting opium into China;
they've always been involved in the drug industry, using drugs on the people,
to conquer them. Back with more - after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, Alan Watt
here, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we'll go to Rachel from North
Carolina, are you there Rachel?

Rachel:
Hello.

Alan: Yes.

Rachel: Hi, good to
talk to you again. Oh, there just an avalanche of information out there, so
I've been pretty much buried, but I just decided to look into Geithner, just for
fun and I looked on Wikipedia and I'm just looking at his profile and it's
talking about how he's now the Secretary of Treasury, but he was previously the
president of the Federal Reserve; and the strange thing is, you know, I've
heard people talk about his ties with Goldman Sachs and all these conflictive
interests and I'm like what about that big one right there. Just the fact that
he was the president of the Federal Reserve; that seems to me, maybe I'm crazy,
but that seems me to be like appointing the former president of
Glaxo-Smith-Kline to health and human services or something and then giving
them the contracts and have them oversee that no corruption happens.

Alan: Of course,
they've got to keep it in the family and that's what they do. See, from their
perspective, they haven’t failed in anything, they're right on schedule and
course and - technically - they're doing a good job, because they want to
change the system into the next level of their system; so that's why.

Rachel: But, I mean
why, you know I see these congressmen grilling these people and everything,
it's like why don't they bring up that as obvious corruption. There's no
separation between corporations and the government anymore. It's basically like
you can go back and forth, you can be in a corporation and go ahead; it would
be like if it was Citibank and we'd just decide to have that president come and
be the head of the Federal Reserve and then Bernanke says well, I'm not going
to tell you where all that money went and maybe it went to all his friends, you
know the president of Citibank’s friends and everything. So, how would you
know? There would be no way of ensuring that your regulators, who are
supposedly the secretary of Treasury, are doing their job, because you know
they previously worked for these private companies.

Alan: Well,
exactly, the whole thing was a con to begin with, the whole Federal Reserve
System etc. etc. and the whole thing is a con, it's always been a con; and
that's the key to it. As I say: their boys have done the right thing, they
pulled off what they pulled off and they'll all get promoted for doing what
they're supposed to do, at the right time, which was to create another crisis
on top of many crises, during, supposedly, a war on terror worldwide that's
changing the world, just to add to the mayhem to bring in a new system.

Rachel: It's just,
for me, you know, I'm not even that smart; in fact, I really only discovered
you last year sometime, at the end of the year. It just seems so obvious to me
that these things are happening and it's obviously just a big crock; and then,
I thought ok, well let me get active, I'm going to go to our City Council
meeting, here in Durham. You know what their big serious problem was? It was
Duke Students are partying and disrupting the neighbours! I'm not kidding, they spent 20 minutes, at
the beginning they had kids singing and they were bringing people up and
patting each other on the back about what a great job they were doing; and
then, they had developers come in there and ask about re-zoning and then, I
mean, really their big thing was this Duke students' party.

Alan: Oh,
absolutely, and then they’ll all go off to their lodges, the Easter Star and
have a party!

Rachel:
Unbelievable.

Alan: That's how it
works.

Rachel: Well, thank
you very much.

Alan: Thank you.
Well, again, an hour flashes by and I had so many topics to say, but there's
simply not enough time in an hour. So, from Hamish and myself, in Ontario,
Canada: it's goodnight and may your god - or your gods - go with you.