Spreading the word about the growing presence of progressive Alaskans and their powerful ideas on the web

Monday, February 13, 2012

Begich to Stab Obama in the Back This Week? Most Likely

Most Americans do not want the Keystone XL shale oil pipeline built across the USA, from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico, to ship this nasty stuff overseas. That isn't keeping Alaska's junior (or senior) Senator from being part of the cabal in the Senate and House to bypass normal regulatory means, and shoving this nasty project up the ass of the American people and the planet.

“America needs more affordable energy and the jobs its development would produce, so the Obama administration’s decision to deny or delay the Keystone Pipeline project from moving forward is disappointing and frustrating. I’ll continue to push the administration to approve this jobs-creating project.

“Meanwhile, this development underscores the need to keep moving forward on developing Alaska’s enormous energy potential in the Arctic. Good progress has been made getting to work drilling offshore in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas and in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska this year. We must keep that momentum going.

“I’ll also continue to push for oil and gas development in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This area was set aside by Congress specifically for oil and gas production, and it needs to be part of a comprehensive energy plan for the country.”

This week, the U.S. Senate is considering whether to add language forcing approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline to major transportation legislation. In a C-SPAN interview on Friday, Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), the chair of the Senate energy committee, indicated his support for the construction of the risky project after sufficient environmental review. After agreeing with the Obama administration’s decision to require a full environmental review of the pipeline, Bingaman claimed that “the American public would like to see us go ahead with the project to the extent they know what the project entails,” calling it “meritorious”:

They shouldn’t be forced to issue a permit until they are satisfied on the environmental effects involved. So I think that point is valid. Whether that requires another six or eight months, that’s open to question. It is a good issue to try to get resolved some way or another. The American public would like to see us go ahead with the project to the extent they know what the project entails. It sounds meritorious. We’ve got pipelines all over the country. That is true with most members of Congress, too. I think most members of Congress probably would like to go ahead to get the issue resolved.

What Bingaman said is somewhat confusing, but he will vote with the GOP on this. So will Begich - unless we get on the phones and computers and call and email his office. As this is not a very central idea in the minds of 99.5% of Alaskans, I'm not expecting many to heed this appeal.

I've written a few articles about the pipeline controversy, but none recently. By far the best recent article on this issue by a local blogger was posted this morning, by Steve Aufrecht, at What Do I Know? Here's Steve, bringing a video he made two years ago into context:

I got this email about impending legislation which sneaks an approval of the Keystone Pipeline into a transportation bill. Here's a letter about it and the Citizens Climate Lobby is urging people to contact their Senators.

The Senate could vote as early as tomorrow on a plan to greenlight construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Despite President Obama's rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline a few weeks ago, Republicans in Congress are once again engaging in hostage-taking. Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) is trying to attach a measure to the transportation bill that would force approval of Keystone XL.

Tragically, some moderate Democrats appear to be playing along - so this bill could have enough votes to pass.

No evaluation process. No National Interest Determination. No new route identified through Nebraska.

To demonstrate a massive, urgent, grassroots backlash, our friends at 350 have organized a 24-hour petition drive to the Senate. Nearly three dozen groups are emailing their members right now, and 350's Bill McKibben will announce the effort tonight on the Colbert Report.

Republicans and some Democrats in Congress are so owned by Big Oil, that they are willing to bypass the pipeline review process designed to protect Americans from its very real danger.

Our grassroots pressure forced President Obama to reject the pipeline when Republicans tried to force a decision in 60 days. He said it wasn't enough time for the thorough evaluation process we need.

Republicans are claiming that incomplete process was enough. But just last week the State Department Inspector General released a report finding a lack of technical and scientific expertise at the State Department to evaluate the impacts of the pipeline.1 So clearly, this pipeline hasn't been adequately evaluated.

Our Congress should be in the business of acting in America's interest. Instead, their business appears to be Big Oil's business.

Please help make a big statement today to remind our Senators who they really work for, and show huge opposition to this ill-conceived, disastrous pipeline. And please share it widely so we make as large an impact as possible over the next 24 hours, and Bill McKibben has a large number of signatures to announce tonight on the Colbert Report.

Not convinced? At least look at Eriel's original video posted two years ago to hear how the Tar Sands are affecting her people. It should make people think about this project and what sorts of environmental oversight is needed.

Interestingly, Steve's post doesn't mention Begich, whose position has been known for almost four weeks. Steve has known Mark since before Begich was on the Anchorage Assembly. Back in the summer of 2008, before the Democratic Primary, Steve was one of the people who urged me to lighten up on Mark, and to use my contacts nationally to get Begich accepted by progressive funding organizations that were quite leery of Mark's bona fides as a real Democrat. I did that, especially after the primary. Given how close the election was, the money I helped raise then was probably more important than Begich or his staff have ever acknowledged.

Let's see if Begich votes with the GOP crowd and Blue Dogs on this one.

2 comments:

HarpboyAK
said...

Well, I wonder how many good Democrats we can get to show up at the Juneau Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner on March 4th at Centennial Hall and tell Senator Begich that Alaskans are appalled that he would support this Koch Bros project when they are only going to stab him in the back when he runs for re-election.

Mark ain't dancing with them what brung him, and he's rapidly assuring that he definitely will be a one term Senator.