Search This Blog

Secular Drama: Flaws of Indian Secularism

If you are unable to notice the apparent irony in the aforementioned
statement, it is by no fault of yours for we have been raised, essentially, in
a society where notions of secularism are derived from political acuity and
intellectual hypocrisy. The term secular has been frequently in a skewed sense
by the government in order to justify controversial policies, political parties
to procure votes, by intellectuals to exhibit religious tolerance and
sensitivity and the revered media to denounce the so-called ‘non-secular
parties’. Various political parties and multitudes of wiseguys, for long, have
been meddling with the idea of secularism is such a way that it is being
misconstrued by the majority of commoners. For decades, policies have been amended,
minorities have been appeased and vote banks have been secured in the name of secularism.
Finally, I would like to pose the pertinent question: Are we truly secular?

There are several nuances of definitions for secularism and here I would employ
the one which is widely recognised. First and Foremost, secularism doesn’t
promote atheism (unfortunately) and can be exhaustive summarised in the
following points:

·Subject of state is free to preach, practice or
promote any religion or none of them. (Popularly known as Right to Religion

·State ensures equality to all its citizens
irrespective of their religion and prohibits discrimination on the basis of
religion.

·State is equidistant to all religion and laws of
state are pertinent to every citizen regardless of his/her religion.

“Hindutva”, professed by BJP in particular, is prominently
accepted form of non-secularism in modern India amongst the contemporary
parties and secular scholars. However, stating majority sentiment is as
non-secular as stating minority sentiments for in strict sense the parties
whether sensitive to majority or minority are religiously inclined and hence
violating the equidistance clause. On the other hand, if we adhere to the
pluralist interpretation of secularism (as publicised by many intellectuals)
promoting majority is equally secular as promoting minority. However, any of
this logic cannot justify the occasional scathing remarks that have been made
from pulpits in BJP rallies towards Muslims. This is an unequivocal case of
disrespecting the right to religion which allows promotion one religion but not
the defilement of other.

In addition to this perceptible form, there is a minority-appeasing,
intellectually-appealing, vote-winning form of pseudo-secularism which is even
more ubiquitous. It seems to have mustered a lot of appraisals and acceptance
and yet it flouts with the fundamentals of secularism. The denial of alimony
from husband to Muslim women (exclusively) after divorce, just to receive affirmation
of a male-dominated Muslim society is a typical case of denial of right to
equality to a Muslim woman (Shah Bano case) on the basis of religion (after all
women from other religion do receive monetary assistance). This can be
considered analogous to verdict by German lower court which justified Domestic
abuse against Muslim women as it was permitted in Islamic Culture (obviously
the verdict was altered later on). Another congruous example of such inequality
is reservations on the basis of religion. Also, the presence of separate Hindu
and Muslim Codes also demonstrates how laws of states are not equally
significant to all the citizens.

It shall be obvious to a man/woman with any rationale that
the path we have been treading upon doesn’t lead to secularism. It is even more
dismal that political parties and pioneers of the society are unwilling to
recognize this discernible transgression from secularist principles. While
alluding to such non-secular provisions, J.L. Nehru, one of the makers of modern
India stated that a lot of policies are borne out of need to sustain a newly
found nationalist sentiment and shall be undone in future. But, in tides of
time the zeal to reform the nation was lost in battles for power, ideals of
progress were replaced by strategies for victory and policies became a tool of
appeasement rather than an instrument of change, and in this era of transitions,
dreams of secular India were lost and never mourned upon.

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You look at your smartphone screen and try to calculate how much time will the cab driver take to finally reach your location. You acknowledge that, given the traffic in your city, the time you see on your screen may be quite off. You try to estimate whether you can squeeze in the final mail you want to drop before you call it a day. DROP, as if emails are bombs. They probably are. You click on the red compose button and, before the box opens, try to steal another peak. If ever every microsecond mattered, it is now. You start typing and notice how slow you are. You should have taken that touch-typing workshop in the college. Every 30 secs, you try to steal a peek at the dimly lit smartphone screen. You think you can pull it off. You have a mild sense of achievement and a smile sprinkled over your face. You are just there. You look back at the smartphone screen. The backlight is now turned off. You struggle to open the screen lock with one hand while typing the last line with another. …

Biting winds pierce by Ripping my soul into shreds Cold night that muffles me Whispers only of winter ahead. I dare not hope for a fireplace Nor heat of a rug do I aim I seek that flickering candle-light To help me have some warmth in dream Battered body, tattered soul Demand only one reply With goals lost and dreams crushed Why, o man, you still not die?

The above poem is merely a rephrasing of Robert Frost's poem A Question with my words and absorption of the core idea. The poem throws light on the immense pain and suffering that accompanies almost everyone's life; then, enquires meaning and worth of such an existence. Here is Robert Frost's original poem which is more lyrical and succinct. A voice said, look me in the stars, And tell me truly, man of earth, If all the body-and-soul scars Were not too much to pay for birth.

"I desire things that will destroy me in the end" -- Sylvia Plath While looking out of my balcony, I can always spot a single star in the sky. Probably with the pollution level in Bangalore , the dim ones are hard to spot. If it was southern sky, I could bet it was Sirius. But I don't know what direction it is in and I am too lazy to make any efforts to find out. Moreover the name of the star does not matter. However, it has a similar symbolic significance for me as green light had Fitzgerald's Gatsby. A dream well conceived , clearly visualised and yet beyond grasp. A dream thoroughly cherished and yet unattained. This brings me to another haunting question. How do people start dreaming whatever they start dreaming about? Frankly, it's Gatsby who comes to rescue. Gatsby's dream incidentally was a outcome of exposure to the girl( I wish I remembered her but I don't even care about finding right now) . We can't dream of things we cannot envisage. I t…

About Me

I believe nothing is definitive and thus, I can't really describe how I am. In actuality, how I am to X will certainly differ from how I am to Y. However, due to concurrence of opinion a majority of such X and Ys (my friends) I am forced to believe that I do possess certain traits which is witnessed by most of them. It is indisputable that I am more serious than I should be.
I am dogmatic(they all say and I always disagree, which eventually confirms their acquisition). I am weird and boring(disputable). However everything mentioned can be false as well. It depends on how much you know me..and frankly speaking you never know enough.
https://experientialism.wordpress.com/?p=2&preview=true&preview_id=2