Thursday, 11 April 2013

Today at the hate site of anti-Muslim lunatic Pamela Geller, there are no less than eight posts raging and spewing nasty insults at the leaders of the Great Neck Synagogue for canceling
her event, after an outcry from the community. (There may be more by
the time you read this.) This is what she does every time someone has
the courage to say no to her — she flies into a berserk rage about it,
and incites her followers to harass the object of her anger.

Rather than highlight any one of these deranged posts, I thought it
might be illuminating to compile a few of the insults and ugly comments
she’s written so far. For someone who claims not to be a bigoted hate
maven, she certainly does seem full of rage and bile.

craven and cowardly
[…]
that synagogue caved to a leftist/Islamic supremacist smear and intimidation campaign
[…]
unconscionable self-imposed dhimmitude
[…]
vicious leftist reformed rabbis
[…]
crushing freedom of speech in the age of jihad
[…]
aligned with Islamic supremacists in their jihad
[…]I do not promote hate speech

She’s ranting about “free speech” again, as if the Great Neck
Synagogue were obligated to provide her with a venue to preach her
noxious hatred; of course, they’re not obligated at all, and this is no
free speech issue.
Just as Geller is free to emit as much poisonous rhetoric as she can find within herself (and that’s a lot
of poisonous rhetoric), organizations like the Great Neck Synagogue are
free to decide that decent people shouldn’t be exposed to it at their
facilities.

Meanwhile, another synagogue in New Jersey has offered to host Geller’s hatefest:

“I don’t want to happen to them what happened to me,” said Rabbi
Bernhard Rosenberg of Congregation Beth-El in Edison, N.J. “I’ve been
attacked like you’ve never heard — by rabbis, Democrats. I am a
registered Democrat. I voted twice for Clinton. I’ve also been a
Republican. This has nothing to do with party politics.”

Perhaps, but Rosenberg was among a certain segment of right-leaning
Jews put into a bit of panic this summer upon the launch of Rabbis for
Obama, a campaign-sponsored alliance that claimed at its inception “over
613 members.” That’s the number of commandments, or mitzvot, derived
from the Torah and, the Obama campaign says, more than double the number
of rabbis who signed on in 2008.

Conservatives have pounced on the group — which is made up of mostly
Reform, Conservative, Reconstructionist and other non-Orthodox clergy —
and have called on the Obama campaign to disown at least one “radical
rabbi” on the list. Progressive Jewish groups have protested the attacks
as an “unethical smear campaign” designed “to sow divisions in the
Jewish community for short-term political gain.”

Rosenberg said at first he didn’t think there should be “rabbis for
anybody” but felt compelled to form a “counterweight” to the Obama
group. Indeed, some Jewish and other religious leaders have echoed the
sentiment of Rabbi David Wolkenfeld, director of the Jewish Learning
Initiative on Campus at Princeton University, who wrote in The
Huffington Post that such partisan positioning is “unsettling.”

The head of Rabbis for Romney said of his members, “I’m not asking
them to do anything” other than spread the word. He said he has no plans
to run ads and, “I don’t speak about this from the pulpit.”

No comments:

Jewish eugenics pre-dates Hitler's Master Race According to the Israeli daily newspaper quoted below, before the Nazi Third Reich in Germany plotted to create a Master Race from the European gene pool, Zionists had already established a racial purification program to create the perfect Jewish bloodline. More

From the horse's mouth:

"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." -- Menachem Begin (Israeli Prime Minister, 1977-1983. Nobel Prize Winner for...Peace!)

At the dawn of civilization, the blood rite, in which human blood is drunk from the body of a still-living victim, was known to many tribes. However, only one people, that has never progressed beyond the Stone Age, has continued to practice the blood rite and ritual murder. This people are known to the world as Jews.

The author of this book is not Christian, Muslim or Hindu but a Jew and is the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome, and a professor of Jewish Renaissance and Medieval History at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, just outside Tel Aviv.

The following translation was performed free of charge to protest an injustice: the destruction by the ADL of Ariel Toaff’s BLOOD PASSOVER on Jewish ritual murder.

.

.

They cut this Palestinian kid's arms for "throwing Stones" before murdering him

Repeat: The author is the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome, and a professor of Jewish Renaissance and Medieval History at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, just outside Tel Aviv.

Dr. Toaff is uniquely qualified to write this book, being thoroughly familiar with the derivative literature in English, French, German and Italian, as well as the original documentary sources in Latin, Medieval Italian, Hebrew and Yiddish. This is not something he worked on in secret. On the contrary, he worked on it openly with his university students and colleagues in Israel for several years; one of his students was even going to publish a paper on the subject. The author is extremely careful about what he says, and his conclusions must be taken seriously. It reads like a detective story.

If it had been published in Israel, in Hebrew, no one would have cared. There are large bodies of literature in Hebrew that Jews do not wish Gentiles to know about. But Dr. Toaff’s announcement of its publication in Italy, in Italian, raised a worldwide firestorm of fury. Under unbearable pressure, the book was withdrawn from publication, and is not to be re-issued.

You can strike a blow against censorship by circulating this text by e-mail or posting in on the Internet. No one can sue hundreds of people.

If the text is all over the Internet, and everybody has it and everybody knows what is in it, the cat will be out of the bag, and it will have to be published – sooner or later.

"When I open the police files I find detailed reports about Jewish criminals. The archives have enough
material for 100 historians and for 100 years, and even then they won't finish." -- Haartez News. Jerusalem, Tuesday, November 2,2004

1 - Since being branded an "anti-Semite" has become quite a stigma, placing in jeopardy the individual's economic and social welfare, should not the phrase be exactly and rationally defined? Inevitably someone is going to be mislabeled sometime. And yet the arch-Zionist Anti-Defamation League of Banai B'rith, which usually has charge of wielding the branding iron, has repeatedly refused to answer queries from this committee asking for such a definition. We have sadly concluded by wondering whether that "upright" organization should not more accurately be called the Anti-Definition League!

aula

aula

2 - What is a "Semite"? Is it or is it not a member of a racial group? According to the prevailing Jewish authority, Jewry is a religious group only, with no racial (i.e., genetic) identity. Yet they continue tacitly to endorse a 19th century racialist conception of themselves every time they label an opponent "anti-Semitic." In order to get United Nations approval of a measure condemning religious discrimination recently, the so-called State of Israel gravely assented to having the word "anti-Jewish" substituted for "anti-Semitic." If the two are synonymous to any extent, would it not be more accurate if all Jewish organizations similarly dropped the meaningless and racist designation "anti-Semitic" in favor of "anti-Jewish"?

aula

aula

3 - As we have seen, the majority of today's Jews are not descendants of the Old Testament Hebrews but of a Mongolian people of Central Asia called Khazars. These people were fairly recent converts to Judaism, as Arthur Koestler and earlier writers have shown. Yet, the non-Semitic Mongolian "Jews" are by far the most powerful in Jewish and Zionist affairs, and are the ones who quickest raise the cry of "anti-Semitism" against ideas or activities that irritate them. In the interest of historical accuracy, should not this peculiar but evidently necessary vocabulary of swear-words be enriched by the term "anti-Khazar"? At the very least, should not intelligent people realize that anti-Zionism does not equal "anti-Semitism"?

The Six Million Reconsidered, Committee for Truth in History, Historical Review Press

"The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the "children of Israel" will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands."