As regular readers of this page know, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels in 2008 ignored state law and the advice of the state’s attorney general and created so-called “gun-free” zones in public recreational facilities within the city. These restrictions applied to all lawful carry, including by those with a state-issued concealed carry license. A state court, however, soundly rejected Seattle’s theory that the state’s comprehensive firearms preemption law did not apply because the ban only affected city owned or controlled property. As the trial judge noted in her opinion, “If I were to accept the City’s argument … [n]othing would prevent the City from preventing people from being on the street with their firearms, being on the waterway with their firearms, being on any part of a park with their firearms, or being in any other place that the City of Seattle has control over.”

Despite this series of defeats (or perhaps because of them) Mayor McGinn remains committed to the vision of a defenseless Seattle. The mayor is now teaming up with a local gun control organization to establish new “gun free zones” in the city’s private businesses. Businesses are being provided with stickers, designed at the expense of the gun control group, and encouraged to post them to warn visitors that those in possession of firearms will be considered trespassers.

The business owners at least in theory retain the choice as to whether or not to post their premises. Nevertheless, the mayor’s partnership with a private organization that claims it is engaged in a “culture war” against firearms and their owners sends a strong message to those whose livelihoods depend on operating a business in the city. Whether compulsory or not, the officially sanctioned view is clearly anti-gun.

The president of the gun control group involved acknowledged that these so-called gun free zones are not going to stop a “determined killer.” Yet in statements to the press, he invoked the typical anti-gunner’s paranoid view of his neighbors and fellow citizens as would-be murderers whose irresistible impulses to kill are thwarted only by the absence of readily-available firearms. The group’s website also claims the measure is intended to “change the conversation around gun violence.” Apparently, however, the only word Mayor McGinn and his gun control sidekicks are interested in having with Seattle residents who would exercise their constitutional rights to bear arms is “No!”

Perhaps not coincidentally, this public-private partnership to restrict constitutional rights comes on the heels of a failed campaign to pressure Starbucks into instituting a strict no-firearm policy in its retail outlets. Like most businesses serving the public in most locations, Starbucks simply defers to local law regarding the carrying of firearms in its restaurants. This has attracted the wrath of some anti-gun activists who apparently consider coffee houses an especially crucial theatre of conflict in their self-proclaimed “culture war.”

Of course, just as businesses have the prerogative to determine terms of entry on their premises, customers have the prerogative of determining who gets their business. If the Starbucks example is any indication, freedom-friendly businesses have nothing to fear, as the coffee chain’s profits have surged following anti-gunners’ insistent calls for boycotts.

On May 20th, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington rejected a motion by the government defendants to dismiss the lawsuit filed by NRA and the SAF against Washington’s gun control ...

Beginning July 1, 2019, all ammunition transactions in the state of California will be subject to a background check requirement. But in order to implement this requirement, the California Department of Justice (“DOJ”) must first ...

On May 10, President Trump signed the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act into law. This NRA-backed law will help promote firearm safety and training and enjoyment of the shooting sports by freeing up more federal ...

By now gun owners have become accustomed to a certain measure of ignorance from anti-gun politicians and their lapdogs in the mainstream press on matters of firearms policy. It’s the flamboyant stridency of that ignorance that remains ...

Ever since taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives, Democrats have been waging an unprecedented assault on the Second Amendment. Led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Cali.), the caucus has been an entity in virtual ...

At the National Retail Federation’s 2018 convention in New York City, Levi Strauss & Co. Brand President James Curleigh told those assembled that the multinational pants manufacturer intends to be the “most relevant lifestyle brand.” Evidently, part ...

When I started with NRA in 1995, most of the attention our organization received was over legislative efforts in Congress. Firearm-related legislation at the federal level obviously has an impact on far more law-abiding gun ...

Week two of the Bloomberg school massive open online course on “Reducing Gun Violence” ran the same week that one of the lecturers was in the news for exclusionary comments that apply more readily to his course ...

As NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox reported in March, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a challenge by an NRA state affiliate to a New York City gun control scheme that effectively prohibits lawfully ...

More Like This From Around The NRA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.