"v8 performance improvements"I'd like to get more details about this. I ran a Sunspider benchmark before updating. I got 577.6 ms with 3.0, and 616.6 ms with 4.0. Not that I care about it, but this isn't an improvement, it actually got worse.Do I have to run your own Javascript benchmark to see the improvement?Anyway, now that I've updated, I can't make other comparisons...

For the record, I'm using a Q6600 @ 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM on Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit.

Huh, Google really tries to sell everything under name the "HTML5".Notifications has nothing to do with HTML5.And actually WebSockets is also a separate draft, and so is Web Database (well, actually there is nothing called "Web Database")

Firefox and IE are able to update automatically when a computer is connected to internet VIA Proxy. But Chrome can not be updated unless there is a direct connection to the internet.. Chrome Team, Please work on this, there are a hell lot of chrome users connected to internet through proxy.

Overall, Google Chrome development team have made a great mistakes in their newly launch browser. Some of the essentials element is completely omitted from the menu and the performance rendering is reduced significantly. Moreover, one of the most frustration things is that the extension application is not perform efficiently as what the Mozilla Firefox did and this could directly hurts the Google Chrome supporter. Hence, by comparing the features as well as capabilities, Mozilla Firefox was significantly perform better than Google Chrome in terms of compatibility as well as user friendliness.

Well, actually what is more important - speed, or less functionally serious bugs? I would prefer browser which is maybe slower by a few millisecons but it's functional. However Chrome is doing well compared to IE, Safari etc.

How can we get 3.x back 4.x does not work with my GWT application, it seems to cache it and wont' reload the main page. Only way around it is to delete the cache every time which is thoroughly annoying.

Just wondering... Has Chrome always rendered the picture incorrectly on Acid 3 or is it just my computer? All I get is the box saying ACID 3 and 100/100 but there are no colors...Ok, Just tried it again... It sometimes works but sometimes doesn't.

@gcstang: what if you append ?nocache to your URL? Does that work/help?

@everyone that's looking for "Clear browsing data:" Have you looked under Tools, Options, "Personal Stuff" tab, "Browsing data:" section, "Clear browsing data" button? @Eric: Maybe they're *NOT* emulating IE by *NOT* making the same thing available in several different places!

@wpdunn: I've been using this version since it entered beta & have had no problems whatsoever with Flash. Have you tried all the usual things, like clearing cache, etc? Perhaps it scrambled along the way...

I have used the Embed Gadget (Insert >> More Gadgets >> Featured) to display movies from YouTube in a bigger size in my site created with Google Sites. It worked very well in Google Chrome 3, and also works in Firefox 3 and IE 7-8, but the movies does not display in Google Chrome 4.0.249.78.

For an example, see http://sites.google.com/site/enkateronline/grunderna

Yes, I reported it at http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?fid=3010b9d7e9757c8e00047e8ae127c8e8&hl=en and I hve seen that it is also reported at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=embed+gadget&colspec=ID+Stars+Pri+Area+Type+Status+Summary+Modified+Owner+Mstone+OS&x=mstone&y=area&cells=tiles