this forum welcomes all forumers who appreciate decent and well thought out views and discussions. all forumers are encouraged to accept that different forumers have different views and often there is no absolutely right or wrong views.

The Truth Behind US Aggressive Posture And Hostile Provocations In The South China Sea And The East China Sea

Why is US so dead against China? China has never done any harm to US both in the past and in the present. But US has always treated China with contempt. US has never conceal its great dislike for China because it is a communist state.All American leaders both past and present have always harboured the determination to take China down because they claim China as an authoritarian communist state is anathema to Western Democracy in which US is the outspoken Champion and leader.All US elites, intellectuals, military and political leaders have always uttered that China as an authoritarian state will not last and will soon collapse into the scrap heap of history.. To enhance the quick demise of China they have always adopted all plans and means and insidious policies to make sure China become a fail state.In the 1930s and 1940s US supported the imbecile Chiang Kaishek Kuomintang against Mao Tse Tung. In 1950 US started the Korean War to involve China so as to wear down China from rising. It started trade and economic sanctions against China to prevent China's national reconstruction and development. It intervened in China's Civil War between Mao Tse Tung and KMT by stationing the Seventh Fleet in the Taiwan Strait to prevent Mao Tse Tung from taking Taiwan thus preventing China from taking the Chinese Civil War to a fruitful conclusion.

In the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Treaty and San Francisco Treaty , Japan was supposed to give back to China all the territories that Japan took from China and they include the Diau Yudao, Taiwan, the Pescadores, the Paracel Islands, the Spratley Islands and its shoals and surrounding seas. However in 1976 US treacherously handed Diau Yudao to Japan inspite of protest from Taiwan KMT and China.. In the mid 1970s when China announced the discovery of rich oil and other mineral resources under the sea bed of the South China Sea, US secretly encouraged Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia to grab some of the Chinese islands in the Spratley and Paracel group.

Though US says it is not a claiment to all these islands and does not take sides among the claiments it is adopting the most aggressive hostile posture towards China. US is openly championing and supporting the spurious illegal claims of the Philippines and Vietnam.We have yet to know by what dubious corrupted means US had used behind the scene to encourage and embolden the Pinoys and the Viets to steal Chinese territories and challenge Chinese ownership.

US is supporting Japan in the Diau Yudao and the Pinoys and the Viets in the South China Sea issues not because US believes that Japan, Philippines and Vietnam have a genuine case . US support of the Japs, Pinoys and the Viegts is part of the US calculus to bring China down by all means economically, politically and militarily. The Diau Yudao and the South China Sea issues are exploited by US to serve its agenda and excuse of open confrontation with China. The crap that US is constantly harping that it is challenging China in the South China Sea for freedom of passage is hogwash because China has never and will never stop free passage in the sea lanes of the South China sea.But free passage does not mean US has the right to conduct nefarious activities against China in encroaching on China's airspace and naval spying activity close to China's long coastline. The Diauyu Dao and the South China issues just serve as a convenient excuse and platform for US to undermine China's rights and national security and this is part of the whole conundrum of bringing China down.

US leaders both civilian intellectuals, professors, politicians, presidents and the military always openly and proudly declare that US will not allow any country to become as rich and powerful as US not to say becoming richer and more powerful than US. To the US establishment it sees China as committing a sin of becoming rich and powerful now. Therefore US has to take down China. It tried economic sanctions on China before but it didn't work. So now US is tinkering with the thought of using the military means to destroy China. US is using the Diaoyu Dao and the South China issues as a heaven sent excuse for opening hostilities against China. It is intent on luring China out to fight with its provoking spying overflights and naval incursions.which threaten China's sovereign security. US believes whether rightly or wrongly that it now has a chance to destroy China by military means with its overwhelming military might of fourteen aircraft carriers, hundreds of warships and nuclear armed submarines and twenty thousand bombers both conventional and nuclear armed as well as space armed satellites and thousands of nuclear armed rocket missiles.

So it is not true that US is fighting for freedom of passage in the South China Sea and neither it really believes that philippines and Vietnam have a strong case in their nefarious claims on Chinese territories . It is a twisted logic for US to falsely and insidiously accuse China of trying to grab its neighbours' territories.. It is just US establishment look at a rich and powerful communist China with jaundiced eyes and its inherent hatred for China is so great that it feels it has a mission to destroy China. Another reason is that US has a latent desire to secure hegemonic control over the East China Sea and the South China Sea and the rich oil and mineral resources under the sea bed respectively. But US may have miscalculated for China is no more "The Sick Man of Asia " as in the last century , but is now a rich and powerful nuclear armed military power with second strike capabilities. US mistakenly thinks it can kill the Chinese without incurring injury to itself. An attack on China now could be the last battle for US and the demise of USA itself. Well, man proposes but God disposes. The earlier the moronic US establishment comes to its senses the better for mankind.

Trojan Horses and Little USAs, got difference meh?
The South China Sea dispute has led to the often quipped terms in the lips of the protagonists like Trojan Horses and Little USAs. Both terms are unique in their origins, from Singapore or by Singaporeans. You don’t hear them being repeated by leaders, diplomats or analysts from other Asean countries, not even from the USA. And the way the terms were used, especially Trojan Horses, came with very strong negative connotations.
What about the term Little USAs, are there any negative connotations? It depends on where the person using it is coming from. This term first appeared in an article by Simon Tay. He put it politely and tried not to ruffle feathers knowing where the sensitivity is.
What does the term Trojan Horses mean? No guessing, it means exactly in the same way as the Trojan Horse of Troy. It means those countries in Asean that were labeled as Trojan Horses of China were the agents of China and out to protect China’s interest in the South China Sea and to harm Asean.
What about Little USAs? Actually Little USAs and Trojan Horses are terms that meant the same thing and doing the same thing, serving their masters and working to protect the interests of their masters. If one is ugly, the other is just as hideous.
The Trojan Horses have been named as Laos and Cambodia. What about the Little USAs, who are they or which countries are the Little USAs or Trojan Horses of the USA? A clue, not the Philippines, not Vietnam. They are open in opposing China and siding with the USA.
While there will be Little USAs versus Trojan Horses to support their masters, Singapore’s relations with China is on the mend with Hsien Loong and Xi Jinping saying that there might be differences but these should not be allowed to affect the strong bilateral ties. So, would Singapore’s civil servants still be allowed to accuse China of trying to divide and rule Asean? Or would they be allowed to call China’s friends Trojan Horses? If these would continue, then Singapore is really punching above its weight, a class of its own, and China just got to accept it and take the bollocking as sign of strong bilateral relations._________________what i posted is just my personal view. feel free to disagree.