Two paragraphs about Cusack and a law professor's criticisms, nothing specific or germane to the thesis.

Seven paragraphs about speculations of what Cusack or said attorney may/might say/think and economics.

Conclusion:

The Obama administration’s national security and counterterrorism policies are worthy of serious discussion and criticism. But some so-called civil libertarians who obsess over “Rubicon” lines to be protected at all costs are unlikely to provide much of either.

So what have we learned her kiddies? Perhaps that when "The American Constitution Society" (whoever the hell that is) wants to discuss CIA torture and Holder's failure to make them accountable, they shall invoke John Cusack and discuss economics as a way to illustrate the "sanctimonious criticism" some people may have of CIA torture and drone strikes.