Great result. We had quite a few misssing aswel like newman, broadbent and whitely aswel as having 8 (i think) first year 19's in the seventeen. Our packs got some real size and talent in it, i read a report of our 19's game against saints last week on the saints website, the writer described our pack as, a pack of giants resembling the great bradford packs of the late 90's early 2000's. Whats your take on spencer darley? Seen he was captain last night, he seemed under the radar coming through compared to some others.

mattsrhinos1978 wrote:Great result. We had quite a few misssing aswel like newman, broadbent and whitely aswel as having 8 (i think) first year 19's in the seventeen. Our packs got some real size and talent in it, i read a report of our 19's game against saints last week on the saints website, the writer described our pack as, a pack of giants resembling the great bradford packs of the late 90's early 2000's. Whats your take on spencer darley? Seen he was captain last night, he seemed under the radar coming through compared to some others.

In all honesty im very late on the uptake wrt Darly but the lad has potential.I will add our Pack maybe Giants but they can all play RL aswell they aren't straight forward drive it in players.

RHINO-MARK wrote:In all honesty im very late on the uptake wrt Darly but the lad has potential.I will add our Pack maybe Giants but they can all play RL aswell they aren't straight forward drive it in players.

Yeah theres some good ability there to complement there size and power. Said it in a thread at the end of last season, think the talent in our acedemy right now is the best its been for 15 plus year. To think walker,smith and oledzki still qualify for the 19's aswel. Exciting times.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:

Jump to:

It is currently Sat May 25, 2019 3:03 pm

All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or it's subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.