Why Don't We Have Artificial Gravity In Space?

In outer space, even though all the masses in the Universe gravitate just as normal, there is no 'up' or 'down' as there is on Earth, as the spacecraft and everyone on board accelerates due to gravity at the same rate.NASA / ESA / ISS Expedition 37

Put a human being up in space, away from the gravitational bonds of the surface of the Earth, and they'll experience weightlessness. Although all the masses in the Universe are still pulling on them gravitationally, they pull on whatever spaceship you're in equally, too, and so you float. In TV shows and movies like Star Trek, Star Wars, Battlestar Galactica and many others, though, you always see the ship's crewmembers stably on the "floor" of the starship, regardless of any other conditions. This would require some type of artificial gravity to be physically possible, but that's a tall order for the laws of science as we presently know them.

For gravitation, the big lesson from Einstein is the equivalence principle: that a uniformly accelerating reference frame is indistinguishable from a gravitational field. If you were in a rocket ship, and unable to view the Universe outside of your surroundings, you'd have no way of knowing which one was going on: do you feel the downward force due to gravity, or do you feel the downward force because your rocket is accelerating in a particular direction? That was the very idea which led to General Relativity, and more than 100 years later, it's the most correct description of gravitation and acceleration that we know of.

The identical behavior of a ball falling to the floor in an accelerated rocket (left) and on Earth (right) is a demonstration of Einstein's equivalence principle.Wikimedia Commons user Markus Poessel, retouched by Pbroks13

There's another trick we can use if we like: we can make a spaceship rotate. Instead of a linear acceleration (like a thrust on a rocket), you can have a centripetal acceleration at work, where a person on board will feel the outer hull of a spaceship pushing them towards the center. This was used famously in 2001: A Space Odyssey, and would, if your spacecraft were large enough, be indistinguishable from a gravitational force.

But that's absolutely it. Those three types of acceleration — gravitational, linear, and rotational — are the only ones we have that will have the effects of gravity. Which is a big, big problem aboard a spaceship.

A 1969 station concept, to be assembled on-orbit from spent Apollo program stages.The station was to rotate on its central axis to produce artificial gravity.NASA

Why? Because if you want to travel to another star system, you'll have to accelerate your ship to get there... and you'll have to decelerate your ship once you arrive. Unless you can shield yourself against those accelerations, catastrophe awaits you. For example, to accelerate to full impulse in Star Trek, a few percent the speed of light, would cause to to experience over 4,000 gs of acceleration even if you took an hour to get up to speed. That's more than 100 times the acceleration necessary to prevent the blood from flowing through your body: a bad situation no matter how you spin it.

This launch of the space shuttle Columbia in 1992 shows that acceleration isn't just instantaneous for a rocket, but occurs over a long period of time spanning many minutes. For a starship, versus a rocket, the acceleration would be many times greater, even if sustained, than a human body could withstand.NASA

Moreover, unless you want to be effectively weightless during the long journey — subjecting yourself to horrific biological wear-and-tear like bone loss and space blindness — you'll want some type of force exerted on your body continuously. For the other forces, this is easily doable. In electromagnetism, for example, you could place the crew inside a conducting shell, and any external electric fields get cancelled out. You could then set up two parallel plates inside, and have a constant electric field, causing charges to be "pushed" in a particular direction.

If only gravity worked the same way.

Schematic diagram of a capacitor, where two parallel conducting plates have equal and opposite charges, creating a uniform electric field between them. This configuration is impossible for gravity, unless there's some form of negative gravitational mass.Wikimedia Commons user Papa November

There is no such thing as a gravitational conductor, and no way to shield yourself from the gravitational force. There's no way to set up a uniform gravitational field in a region of space, either, such as between two plates. The reason? Because unlike the electric force, which is generated by positive and negative charges, there's only one type of gravitational "charge," and that's mass-and-energy. The gravitational force is always attractive, and there's simply no way around that. Instead, you have to do the best you can with the three types of acceleration — gravitational, linear, and rotational — available to you.

The overwhelming majority of all the quarks and leptons in the Universe are made of matter, but there exist antimatter counterparts from each of them, whose gravitational masses are undetermined.Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP), U.S. Department of Energy / NSF / LBNL

The only way you'd be able to have artificial gravity, both to shield you from the effects of your ship's acceleration and to give you a constant pull "downward" without needing to accelerate it, is if somehow you discovered a type of negative gravitational mass. All the particles and antiparticles we've ever discovered have a positive mass, but those are inertial masses, or the mass you talk about when you accelerate or create a particle. (That is, the m in F = ma, and the m in E = mc2.) We've demonstrated that inertial mass and gravitational mass are the same for all the particles we know of, but we've never tested this sufficiently for antimatter or antiparticles.

The ALPHA collaboration has come the closest of any experiment to measuring the behavior of neutral antimatter in a gravitational field.Maximilien Brice/CERN

There are experiments working to do this right now! The ALPHA experiment at CERN has created antihydrogen: a stable form of neutral antimatter, and is working to isolate it from all other particles at very low speeds. If it becomes sensitive enough, we could then measure which way it falls in a gravitational field. If it falls down, the same as normal matter, then it has positive gravitational mass, and we can't use it to build a gravitational conductor. But if it falls up in a gravitational field, that changes everything. With a single experimental result, artificial gravity would suddenly become a physical possibility.

The possibility of having artificial gravity is tantalizing, but it is predicated on the existence of negative gravitational mass. Antimatter may be that mass, but we don't yet know, experimentally.Rolf Landua / CERN

If antimatter has negative gravitational mass, then by setting up a ceiling of antimatter and a floor of normal matter, we could create an artificial gravity field that always pulled you down. By building a gravitationally conducting shell as the hull of our spacecraft, everyone inside would be protected from the forces of ultra-rapid acceleration which would otherwise prove lethal. And most spectacularly, humans in space would no longer suffer the negative physiological effects, from balance disorders to the atrophy of your heart muscle, that currently plague today's astronauts. But until we discover a particle (or set of particles) with negative gravitational mass, artificial gravity will only be brought about through acceleration, no matter how clever we are.

I am a Ph.D. astrophysicist, author, and science communicator, who professes physics and astronomy at various colleges. I have won numerous awards for science writing since 2008 for my blog, Starts With A Bang, including the award for best science blog by the Institute o...

Starts With A Bang is dedicated to exploring the story of what we know about the Universe as well as how we know it, with a focus on physics, astronomy, and the scientific story that the Universe tells us about itself. Written by Ph.D. scientists and edited/created by astro...