Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on
November the 2nd, 2012. For newcomers, make sure your help yourself to the
website cuttingthroughthematrix.com;
there’s lots of audios for free download. You’ll start to understand the big
system of conology – I call it, conology – that you’ve been born into. It’s a
good system; it conned your parents and grandparents before you, so it works
very, very well. And it’s ongoing because there’s a definite agenda to it
all. I go through the organizations that set up in the late 1800s/early 1900s
to take over not just the world but all of its resources and manage it properly,
including us, human resources, and how they’d bring in a new scientifically
controlled society under authoritarianism. And we’re here right now with it
all, in fact. They have accomplished many of their objectives. It was the same
objectives as Karl Marx had, and Lenin and Stalin, and of course the big banks
that funded them, because it was international bankers who funded communism
into existence. It works out very well. It’s called the Hegelian dialectic. You
both start off on opposite roads and end up on the same one. And you can’t get
change without having conflict between the two, so you plan the conflict, you
plan the change and you guide it. Quite simple. So you’re living through it
today.

So
help yourself to the website. Remember too, you are the listeners that bring me
to you. I don’t bring on guests that either pay to get on to flog books or
whatever or to flog their magic potions or whatever. It’s up to you to keep me
going, because I just depend on you, the listeners, to buy the books and discs at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com or to donate. [Order and donation options
listed above.] Straight donations are awfully, awfully welcome in these
hyperinflationary/quantitative easing times of hyperinflation. And we’re only
really starting at it, because we’ve got a long way to go.

Remember
too, the banks planned this a long time ago, they’d bring in, and use money and
their central banking system, to crash economies and then renew themselves into
a higher form of authority. That’s exactly what’s happening today, as the
central banks are given more power than ever before, after plundering us all,
these private banks. They’re all under the Bank for International Settlements
at Basel, Switzerland, all of these private central banks. They also have their
front organizations called the United Nations, for instance, and the Council on
Foreign Relations that gives you all of your media news and the Royal Institute
of International Affairs that set up the whole thing, and all of it in the very
first place, these international bankers and their sons. They mainly came from
Germany and were based in London at the time.

Their
history was well spelled out by their own historian Carroll Quigley and you’ve
got to get the book The Anglo-American Establishment because he gives
you the agenda in it. He actually thought it worthwhile publishing that book
because he says, it’s time the public
knew that there’s another force guiding and shaping all of the major history
throughout their lives, and it’s been working steadily for well over a hundred
years to make all this possible. And you are living through THEIR
system. The right-wing see it as communist, but the communists see it as
right-wing. It’s wonderful because only the top of the communist and the
right-wing know the real purpose of it all, as they play the dialectic, and we
go along with it all. That’s the system we’re living in today. It’s a
managed society going into a technocratic society, run by technocrats, and
literally scientists as well, all beneath them, using technologies to make sure
the world is progressing along the directed path. There is nothing happenstance
about the big changes. There’s nothing that happens, with spontaneous wars and
9/11s, that type of thing, and the flurry of wars that follow it, they were all
planned long before 9/11 happened. I’ll be back with more after this break.

Hi
folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s interesting to
see how the big agenda works, because you have to study it for a long time,
many, many years, and you understand the tricks that are pulled upon the
public, and how INCREMENTALISM is generally the technique that’s used, pushing
the envelope a little bit at a time on different areas. And you adapt to the
changes thinking, well that’s not much of a change at the moment, and
the next step comes, until literally you’re 180 degrees away from where you
started. That’s been the technique for actually hundreds of years by those who
rule the world. They take simple things, they make a big deal out of them, they
obfuscate them, make them complicated, and most folk just simply give up and
let them go ahead and do what they want to do. But you don’t understand there’s
a big agenda there.

You
have to understand that Karl Marx came out with a theory that wasn’t his in the
first place. Karl Marx, too, was a good pal of Charles Darwin and wanted
to actually put Darwin down in the third edition of his book; Darwin wanted to
do it as well but he had to pretend that he was a bit different from Marx, for
the general public of that time. But they were both brought out at the same
time, and Freud later of course, to change society. That was the reasons for
it, all from the same groups of people.

We
find that they knew a long time ago what they wanted to do. If you want to
conquer the world and conquer nations then you must conquer and destroy, utterly,
the cultures of the nations. Again, Theodor Adorno talked about this many times
in his writings with the Frankfurt school, and many other schools too.
Even the Weather Underground [Organization] talked about using words and so on
to confuse people, and to silence people who were against particular programs.
So they’d label you with a word and that would shut you up, like Nazi or
whatever, whatever it happened to be, it would work awfully well. And phobias,
you know, anything with phobia at the end of it now is a politically correct
thing to do.

So
we find that the same techniques are being used, and these are psychological
techniques. Behaviorists came up with the idea, that worked with Adorno and
also Bertrand Russell too, who claimed he was a philosopher but he actually
worked with the Vienna school and other schools that were there to change the
world. They thought it was all just too abnormal for them to bear, so they
would change it all and make it proper, with themselves in charge as the new
authoritarians. But we find this article here, for instance. I’ve
read this before, a bit of it, but it’s on a different site and it says…

Children to be taught 'heterosexuality not the norm'

in Australian schools project

lifesitenews.com / Hilary White / Oct 18, 2012

(Alan: It’s
from the United Nations.)

SYDNEY, October 18,
2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – Australian school children are to be told that
heterosexuality is not the norm, according to a new education department pilot
program called “Proud Schools.” (A: ...all this pride stuff, you
know.)

“Heterosexism” is
one of the evils that the Proud Schools program is intended to stamp out, along
with “homophobia and transphobia,” (A: ...they’re getting all of these
kinds of phobias all involved now, that didn’t exist before.) education
officials have said. According to the minutes from the Proud Schools steering
committee (A: ...and that’s a private organization, Proud Schools, you
know. We’re run by private organizations, for those who haven’t figured out
what democracy is.) on March 22, 2011, the program focuses on reversing
“the dominance of heterosexism rather than on homophobia.” (A:
See, they dream up the terms, they make the terms, they create the divisions,
then they get you fighting, then they get what they want.)

The program defines
“heterosexism” as the practice of “positioning heterosexuality as the norm for
human relationship,” (A: Well if it wasn’t the norm none of us would
be here, obviously, right. And the same with all nature as well, all the
other creatures.) According to the Proud Schools Consultation Report. “It
involves ignoring, making invisible or discriminating against non-heterosexual
people, their relationships and their interests. Heterosexism feeds
homophobia.” (A: That’s nonsense. Years ago you didn’t hear all
this stuff, because once folk were in their own houses they could do whatever
they wanted and nobody cared. But now it’s got to be in your face, you see, as
they destroy the target. The target of course is actually what they call
heterosexism – that’s the target of all of this – and heterosexuals are the
enemy, you see. Remember, getting back to the war, you understand there’s a long-term
ongoing war here; it’s never changed. And you’ve got to destroy all cultures,
completely, utterly, and cause mayhem – Theo Adorno went right into that –
utter mayhem in the cultures. Government agencies step in to clean up the mess
and take over the responsibilities that heterosexuals and that used to have –
and they’ve done a good job of that with all their agencies – and the State
comes in and provides abortions. So everyone then is responsible for everybody
else’s acts. Someone decides that they could get pregnant, then you have to pay
for them for the rest of their lives. You see, this is communism, you
understand, how communism really works.)

The committee
suggested that teachers must monitor the playground in order to stamp out
“heterosexist” language among children in out-of-class hours. (A:
What is heterosexist language? You know.)

The education
department has allocated $250,000 for the pilot program that is running now in
12 state schools.

The program was
initiated in 2010 by Labor’s former Education Minister Verity Firth (A:
...what a name, Verity Firth... It’s like a magazine eh?) and has been
implemented and supported by current New South Wales Education Minister Adrian
Piccoli. Piccoli said his department was dedicated to “stamping out homophobic
bullying”. A similar program is already in use in Victoria, called the “Safe
Schools Coalition” to “support sexual diversity”. (A: Now,
why is this a priority? Think about it. With all of the things happening in the
world, this is a priority; the United Nations has made it THE priority.)

Proud Schools
recommends using Personal Development, Health, and Physical Education classes,
starting in Year 7 (12- and 13-year-olds), to “incorporate learning about
same-sex attraction and sexual diversity.” (A: In other words, how can you tell if you haven’t tried it all?
Maybe you should see a counselor… Maybe you are phobic yourself… Maybe you’ve
got inhibitions… Why don’t you try it? Do you understand what this is
all about? I hope you really do. I hope you do.)

Homosexualist groups
and left-leaning columnists are furious and aiming editorial attacks at the
Sydney Telegraph for having criticized the program as “politically correct” and
for having revealed the text of the Proud Schools steering
committee. (A: They prefer that parents don’t know what’s
going on, you see.)

The Telegraph’s
Miranda Devine wrote that “at least” 10 Liberal Party MPs are “extremely
concerned” about the program, and will complain to Education Minister Adrian
Piccoli this week.

Devine quoted Upper
house MP Fred Nile who called the program “propaganda” and asked the government
to defund the program.

“I’m totally opposed
to the brainwashing of high school students, especially when they are going
through puberty,” Nile said. “Homosexuals at most make up 2 percent of the
population - I don’t know why the education department would give priority to
promoting this. (A: Well, it’s not to stop bullying and all that
stuff. It’s to literally confuse all the other students – this is a war, folks,
it’s a war – confuse all the other students and make them inhibited in saying
anything at all, that they find rather awful or perhaps even disgusting if
someone comes on to you, of the same gender, etc., etc.)

“We will have more
confused teenagers than ever…(A: ...that’s the purpose.) children
should be allowed to develop themselves,” he said.

NSW Premier Barry
O’Farrell defended the program, vowing that it will not be shut down.

“I don’t believe
that sexual orientation is any more a matter of choice than one’s gender,”
O’Farrell said. “Whether discrimination is on the basis of gender, sexuality,
race or something else - it is unacceptable.”

Now
people, you understand, prejudice used to have a different meaning. See, the
same boys give you the terms to use that make you feel ashamed or whatever. But
at one time you had a prejudiced taste, if you were a wine taster or of Brandy
or whatever. But they changed it all to make it sound like something really
awful. So you’re not allowed an opinion or a bias anymore. Everyone is
biased towards something, that’s why folk vote left or right, you see. So the
ones who run the war always run… They set out the path, you know, the course of
the war, the battlefield, they give you the terms to go by, but they generally
run it in such a way using neurolinguistics, and neologisms, new words, to
confuse you until they get their way. That’s exactly what Theodor Adorno went
through, and so did the Weather Underground as well. They talked about using
terminology to confuse people to get their way, and to shame people, because
they make you ashamed about nothing… nothing, you see; having an opinion is to
be ashamed. You see, it’s amazing too, because Theo Adorno talked about the
authoritarian personality. You understand, in liberalism they are the ultimate
authoritarians because under the guise of freeing everyone, they’re completely
intolerant of anyone with any other opinion. And they make it legal, all their
intolerance, you see.

Now...

U.N. Agency Calls for Teaching Children 5-to-8 Years
of Age about Masturbation

cnsnews.com / August 24, 2009 / Christopher
Neefus

(A: Now,
this started off when Janet Reno was in with Clinton, in fact. That’s why the
head of the US Department, where that woman used a military uniform for health,
she was actually fired because she put it forward; she wanted to get it done in
classrooms. This is like mutual masturbation in the classroom, folks. And
who put it out? UNESCO, the United Nations, you see.)

(CNSNews.com) – A
June report from the United Nations Economic, Social and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) suggests children of all countries and cultures are entitled to sexual
and reproductive education beginning at age five.

The report, called
International Guidelines on Sexual Education, was released in June in
conjunction with the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) (A: ...the one that wants to
bring down the population, and abortion and all that...), an organization
which works for universal access to “reproductive health care.” (A:
...meaning abortion care, because that’s all they’re about.)

In its rationale for
creating the guidelines, the UNESCO report said it is “essential to recognize
the need and entitlement of all young people to sexuality education.” An
appendix backed that claim by pointing to a 2008 report from the International
Planned Parenthood Federation (A: See, they work together. In fact,
Planned Parenthood is under the umbrella of UNESCO. So they ask their
next-door neighbor in the next office, what
do you think, we’re writing this and you back us up on it. They do this
all the time.) that argued governments “are obligated to guarantee sexual
rights,” and that “sexuality education is an integral component to human
rights.” (A: Now, I read the article last night, and it’s from
Exclaim, which is put out by Planned Parenthood International, and the United
Nations, that want to abolish all consenting age for sex with children. Now,
you better understand, pedophilia is wide open now for this, because that’s
where it’s heading. That’s what it’s all about, folks. You know,
intergenerational sex has taken over from the term pedophilia... It’s the right of the child if they want to.
You better understand what’s running your world here. Back with more after
this.)

Hi
folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and cutting through all the nonsense
that we’re force-fed. And we are force-fed this rubbish. And you never
ask the questions, of all these people that you think you vote for and that you
think you choose, how come they go along with it and sign all these things into
law? across the whole planet? How come? See, they’re all preselected by the
Council on Foreign Relations. Every
member, every president, every Prime Minister, according to Quigley who
was the historian for this group said,
has been a member of the CFR for a hundred years. It doesn’t
matter what party you vote for, they’re all on board with it, all the ones at
the top are, you see.

I’m
reading this article here about the United Nations calling for teaching
children 5 to 8 years of age about masturbation and so on. It goes into
homophobia, trans-phobia, abuse of power and all that kind of stuff, and how to
have pleasure in sex, yada-ya. Understand how clever it was too, that the same
group, working together as always, Planned Parenthood and the United Nations –
because as I say they’re all under the umbrella of the United Nations – wanted
the Rights of the Child, you see. And everyone says, okay, that’s fair
enough, you know, we’re not bad people, let’s give children rights. Well
this was the right so that children could eventually, you can’t stop them from
having sex with some, you know, ancient old sod, because they’ll say, well
that’s the child’s right if they approve, you see. This is what it was all
for. It was nothing to do with giving them other rights. It was purely to do
with this agenda here and get them into early sex, prepubertal sex and, again,
abolishing the whole term of pedophilia and every other term that’s used with
abusing children. That’s what it’s about, for those that care. I think society
is so jaded today, because everyone’s been contaminated with the trash they’ve
poured out for years, again, all on board with the agenda. It really is.
You have no idea of how many think tanks that do nothing but work, for a
hundred years, on every facet of society, bringing it down, nonstop… nonstop.
This is a war to them, you see, to change the world. And the war is all on you.

Also
I read an article last night about the children, the amount of children getting
born in the US is way down and most of them are to single parent families and
so on. In an article on the Mail Online today it says…

Lonely UK: Number of middle-aged people
living alone rises dramatically as marriage continues to decline

dailymail.co.uk / Steve Doughty / 1 November 2012

The decline of
marriage has left ever-increasing numbers of middle-aged men and women living
alone. (A: Well the State takes care of you; they give you a
euthanasia pill.)

Almost 2.5million
between 45 and 64 have their own home but no spouse, partner or children to
live with them.

The army of such
loners has grown by more than 50 per cent – 800,000-plus – since the mid-1990s,
an official analysis said yesterday. (A: See, they’re always
doing these analytics to see if they’re on target with the big agenda of
destroying society. Do you know how much time and effort these foundations have
put in, over many years, to utterly destroy society?)

And the number of
men on their own has increased far more than women.

Lonely: The decline
in marriage has seen huge increases in the number of people living alone.
Around 2.5m people aged 45-64 now live by themselves

The Office for
National Statistics (A: Just like Orwell said in 1984, you
always have an office of national statistics; they always prattle out your
stats. And you can’t argue with that can you? I mean, as they say, there’s lies, damn lies, and then there are
statistics. Pretending it’s a scientific cover, it must be true.) Report
suggests that men who have not committed to long-term relationships or whose
marriages have been ended by divorce are finding it harder to win partners once
they reach middle age.

One reason could be
that middle-aged women with good qualifications and jobs have little interest
in forming relationships with lower-earning men. (A: It’s not
that at all. It’s all the stuff that they’re feeding the women, they can just
have partner after partner after partner; they’ve been doing it since about the
80s at least, the 70s even. That was a big push, you see. And the government
would guarantee to take care of them and their children, etc., etc.
Meaning, society does, which is communism again.)

Pedophilia
again...

Newsnight caught and fresh pedophile storm amid claims
that a senior political figure will be outed on tonight’s show.

dailymail.co.uk / Martin Robinson and Leon Watson / 2
November 2012

Editor of the
London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, Iain Overton, had claimed on
Twitter that Newsnight would name him.

The tweet prompted
furious speculation online about the identity of the alleged paedophile, who is
still alive. (A: It’s a politician.)

Channel Four’s
Michael Crick claims he is spoken to the man who denies the allegations and
will sue if Newsnight shows the investigation.

The BBC refuses to
confirm if the investigation into the alleged abuser exists.

The BBC is dragged
into a fresh storm over a second Newsnight pedophile investigation, it emerged.

Editor of the London-based
Bureau of investigative journalism, Ian Overton, mysteriously tweeted that a
senior political figure was to be outed as a child abuser on the program this
evening. (A: Well, you can take your pick from a whole bunch of
them, actually.)

The investigation
about the unnamed man whose life is being looked at by the BBC’s legal teams,
Newsnight took the decision despite Mr Overton’s crystal clear message online:
‘If all goes well we’ve got a Newsnight out tonight about a very senior
political figure who is a pedophile.’

Mr Overton’s bureau
is a not-for-profit organisation which works with news outlets to publish
in-depth investigations. It says it has been working on this project for the
BBC.

It piles more
pressure on the beleaguered corporation after last month it was revealed
Newsnight dumped an investigation into paedophile Sir Jimmy Savile, even though
they had interviewed his victims.

It took a ITV
documentary to reveal that Savile had carried out decades of abuse involving
hundreds of children, some of whom were attacked on BBC premises. (A:
It wasn’t just Savile of course, and he also was a procurer, remember; Savile
said that on a video, he was a procurer – he got children for higher-ups.
He was already a Sir, right.)

It emerged that
Newsnight had carried out its own investigation into the paedophile DJ –
including an interview with the same victim in the ITV documentary- nearly a
year before. (A: So they’re still ongoing with all this abuse.
But they’ll really have to clam up, as I say, and divert us into other things
because it can’t go any higher. You know, the elite and the nobility must, you
know, close ranks and stop all of this before it gets any further. Back with
more after this break.)

Hi
folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Again, I’ll put up
tonight that link to Exclaim, from International Planned Parenthood, the guise
that they use, this term, that are really into this promoting sexual activity
very, very young, sexual activity between young people and perhaps older ones
too. They’ve got all these rights now, you see. They want to make sure they
have rights. So I’ll put that link up once again and also one to the
United Nations. It’s UN Watch for those that are interested in what’s running
your lives. Because everything comes through the United Nations, including the
World Bank, the IMF, and all the rest of it, because it was all set up by the
Royal Institute of International Affairs, all of it, to change the whole world.
That’s what’s behind it all. We’ve got to get rid of the United
Nations. Very, very simple. Very, very simple, folks. It’s got to be gotten
rid of.

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va.
— John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, is calling on the
United States Senate Judiciary Committee to protect the privacy and civil
liberties of American citizens from police use of unmanned aerial vehicles,
commonly known as drones. In the wake of the passage of the FAA Reauthorization
Act, it is expected that at least 30,000 drones will occupy U.S.
airspace by 2020. (A: I think it will be long before
2020.) In alerting the Senate Judiciary Committee to the dangers posed by
drones to citizens’ privacy and civil liberties, The Rutherford Institute has
made model legislation available, titled “Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act,”
that would not only prohibit the federal government from using data recorded
via police spy drones in criminal prosecutions but would also prevent police
agencies from utilizing drones outfitted with anti-personnel devices such as
tasers and tear gas. (A: So I’ll put that up tonight too.)

“These
drones—aerial, robotic threats to privacy and security—are being unleashed on
the American populace before any real protocols to protect our privacy rights
have been put in place and in such a way as to completely alter the landscape
of our lives and our freedoms,” said Whitehead. (A: Well, that’s its
intention. See, forget this democracy rubbish; you’ve never had it. You’re run
by just one system now, a world system, it knows exactly where it’s taking us
all. And it has to go on. You understand, for a totalitarian society
everyone must be predictable. They must know what you’re doing at every minute
and second of every single day. That’s what that means, folks.) “It
is critical that Congress not only give serious consideration to the dangers
posed to our freedoms by these aerial devices but ensure that the American
people are protected against any resulting incursions on their rights as
provided for by the U.S. Constitution.” (A: Well, they’ve
already ruled just the other day that the US can use them wherever they want to
use them, and under the guise of, you know, looking for drugs, or anything
else. I mean, that’s as simple as that. They’re not going to stop unless you
say no, that’s it, you see.)

As The Rutherford
Institute’s fact sheet on drones details, the FAA Reauthorization Act, signed
into law by President Obama in early 2012, has opened the door for drones, once
confined to the battlefields over Iraq and Afghanistan, to be used domestically
for a wide range of functions, both public and private, governmental and
corporate. Yet without proper safeguards, these devices, some of which are
deceptively small and capable of videotaping the facial expressions of people
on the ground from hundreds of feet in the air, will usher in a new age of
surveillance in American society.

That’s
the purpose of it. I read an article a few days ago about the people who are
living under the drones over in the Middle East, and the psychological effects
it has when you’ve got 6 or 7 of these things buzzing over your head. See, it changes
your behavior. It’s like the cameras, the CCTV cameras, when they put that
in. It wasn’t to catch folk; it was to alter your behavior. You behave
differently. You’re not spontaneous. You’re not natural. You’re not having fun
walking the streets with your pals; you can’t do that anymore. You behave in a
completely different manner. But when these things are lethal and they’re above
your heads, now you’ve got a psychological terror above your heads, and you are
afraid of them, and you’re going to obey, obey, I’m always getting watched,
obey, just like Orwell’s 1984. That’s what it’s all about. These are
training YOU to be OBEDIENT and SCARED, and quivering, so you’ll obey
any figure of authority. That’s what it’s for, folks. I hope you understand
this.

Obama creates new homeland security
partnership council, to be led by John Brennan

gsnmagazine.com / 2012-11-02 / Jacob Goodwin

In an effort to
foster closer relationships (A: I love these ‘closer
relationships’...) between the field offices of various U.S. Government
departments and the state and local governments in those geographic areas
across the country, President Obama signed an executive order on Oct. 26 which
establishes a new White House Homeland Security Partnership Council, which will
be chaired by the assistant to the president for homeland security and
counterterrorism, which is currently John Brennan.

The new Council will
draw upon expertise residing in federal, state, local and tribal governments --
as well as the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations and
community-based groups -- to enhance the nation’s ability to “address homeland
security priorities (A: You better understand, all these
community-based groups and all the rest of it, and NGOs, non-governmental
organizations, that are funded by your tax money and the big private
foundations, are running your lives. Right down to some of the first articles I
was reading here; that’s all part of Homeland Security now too. So here they go
again into this new public/private partnership deal, only the public have no
input whatsoever, unless you are a UN registered politically correct
nongovernmental organization.) . . .

The new Partnership
Council will be composed of “Federal officials who are from field offices of
the executive departments, agencies and bureaus…,” says the executive order.
Selected members will represent about 18 different departments and agencies,
including Department of Homeland Security, State, Defense, Justice, Energy,
Interior, the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the
Small Business Administration and several others. (A: The ‘several
others’ are the ones you’ve got to watch, these private NGOs from the United
Nations.) “The Council may establish subgroups consisting exclusively of
Council members or their designees, as appropriate,” says the executive order.

A steering
committee, which will provide guidance to the Council, will include
representatives “at the Deputy agency head level,” or a designee, the order
specifies.

The Council will
promote opportunities for partnerships (A: This is a business, folks.)
between the federal field offices and local government stakeholders; raise
awareness of best practices at the local level; conduct outreach to the private
sector and various nongovernment groups (A: See, if you’re not a
member of a nongovernmental GROUP – I stress GROUP is the key here – then you
don’t have any say in anything anymore.); and convene an annual meeting to
exchange key findings, progress and best practices.

Within one year, and
annually thereafter, the Council will provide a report on its work to the
President, through the Council’s chairman.

The executive order
emphasizes that such partnerships are critical to U.S. success at home and
abroad. (A: ...because they’re international.) “This approach
recognizes that, given the complexities and range of challenges, we must
institutionalize an all-of-Nation effort to address evolving threats to the
United States,” it declares.

You
understand, anything, even, as I say, the first articles I was reading here
tonight, will be under evolving threats to the United States – that’s how
they’re going to expand it all. You’re looking at total communism. That’s what
you’re looking at here.

And
a couple of nights ago too I mentioned about the Nigerians. I think it was
Nigerians that were coming into Britain and, you know, they were practicing
Juju; they call it Juju, I’m a Juju man. They come into Britain
and they bring young girls that they’ve often kidnapped or blackmailed and they
turn them off as prostitutes and threaten them with black magic if they don’t
go along with all the stuff. And they really believe in that over there, you
understand; they’re not so sophisticated as Britain. Where, you know, the
juju guys literally threaten your life and all nasty kinds of things, and this
particular juju guy was cutting up some victims as well. They don’t do that in
the West. We’re more civilized, you know; they get folk to sign donor cards,
then they grab all your organs before you’re dead, and we sell them off for
profits, you know. It says here…

'This is outrageous abuse of hospitality': Judge's
anger as he jails family of Ugandan fraudsters who stole £4million in benefits (A: ...welfare
benefits…) to buy luxury homes and
restaurants in Africa

dailymail.co.uk / Christian Gysin / 1 November 2012

(A: Now,
Britain has been advertising openly for the last 40 years I think, that it’s the best welfare state on the planet. And
that was to attract, you know, this multicultural thing, to destroy the
culture. Tony Blair admitted that to his vice Prime Minister, and I’ve read the
articles here on the air. Tony Blair told the guy, his next in command, to open the floodgates to completely destroy
the culture of Britain forever, so that it could never get together again as a
British culture. So here you have all the gangs in Britain looting it
like crazy. They’ve had Romanians coming in, Gypsies that peddle the streets,
and they’re buying homes back home on all the money they’re conning out of the
various levels of welfare they can claim. But it says…)

-Ruth Nabuguzi got
leave to remain by using IDs of fake children and even stole her own two
children's identities.

-Ringleader of
'family firm' claimed more than £2million in HIV and AIDS drugs.

-Drugs were then
sent back to the Uganda and sold for profits.

-Members of nine
strong gang were jailed for a total of 19 years today.

-Scale of fraud so
wide that it is feared leader's identity may never be known.

A judge accused a
family of African fraudsters of an ‘outrageous abuse of the hospitality’ shown
to them by Britain as they were jailed yesterday for stealing £4million from
taxpayers.

The 20-year scam (A:
... 20 years they’ve been at this. That shows you nobody’s looking at
them to get off with this for 20 years. And that’s only one of them, right. The
average person in Britain, who’s been born and raised in Britain, they’re lucky
to get money to heat themselves through the winter. But if they walk in from
other countries, on special lists, you see, from the United Nations, every
layer of government is throwing cash at them.) included one of the fraud
ringleaders creating fake identities for up to 100 children to milk the
benefits system. (A: ...fake identities.)

Ruth Nagubuzi also
claimed to have HIV and Aids in order to receive costly drugs which she then
sent back to Uganda for huge profits.

It was estimated
that supplying the medicines to the 49-year-old, as well as four other made-up
‘sufferers’, cost the taxpayer more than £2million. (A: ...alone.)

A further £154,000
went on education (A: ...private education...) for members of the
‘family’, with £37,500 for a single higher education course. (A:
That’s for one person.)

Fraud relating to
accommodation costs and sub-letting of flats (A: She had flats all
over the place too.) by Nagubuzi cost £650,000, and the family’s benefits (A:
...welfare benefits…) including child allowances, disability benefits, and
council tax and tax credits totalled £900,000. (A: ...£900,000…
for one family. Can you believe…? That’s welfare. And you wonder why
you’re broke! [Alan laughing.])

The gang’s gains
were spent on a complex consisting of luxury apartments, shops, restaurants and
a hotel in Nagubuzi’s home city of Kampala, the Ugandan capital. (A:
And they’ve got all the photographs here, they’re awfully nice.) Plans for
building new properties were found when police raided the gang’s homes across
East London.

The Daily Mail told
last week how in a campaign of deceit lasting more than two decades their
‘family business’ saw them ‘conspire together to create, use and exploit’ false
identities to carry out the staggering fraud.

Yesterday eight of
the group were sentenced to a total of 19 years by Judge Nicholas Ainley at
Croydon Crown Court in South London.

He told Nagubuzi:
‘This was a fraud on a huge scale and it is an outrageous abuse of the
hospitality you were offered by this country when you came here in
trouble. (A: Well, they all come and claim they’re in trouble.
Don’t they?)

‘The identities you
used and no doubt sold were then used by other people. (A: ...they
pass them on.) You had no scruples in bringing children to this country and
then involving them in your criminal pursuits. This was motivated entirely by
greed. All these identities were, for you, valuable commodities.’

The use of so many
names to perpetuate the fraud led one investigator to remark: ‘The true figure
of what these people stole from us may never be known. It could be in excess of
£6million after they launched a systematic assault on our welfare
system.’ (A: So that’s what you get, as they destroy the
cultures.)

Remember
what I said at the beginning too. There’s a war on, a long-term war to destroy
every country’s culture. And Tony Blair ADMITTED that, because that’s what he
ordered for Britain, and this was from the horse’s mouth, at the top. You
understand, the elite don’t have to make excuses for anything; the public go
into disbelief. Oh, I know he said it, but he didn’t really mean it.
That’s all that has to be done. See, you’re trained to be… You’re trained in
socialism. You’re trained, so you make excuses for them.

And
the big thing too, is all the money, your money, going to find ways to get into
your brain. There’s very good, you know, algorithms and all the rest of it being
run all the time by supercomputers and God knows… there’s so many articles
every day on it, even super, super, super computers that the governments all
have, to check all of us 24 hours a day. But now they’re into, again,
they’re always trying to get into the human brain. And it says this has
happened...

Hackers backdoor the human brain, successfully extract
sensitive data

extremetech.com / Sebastian Anthony / August 17, 2012

With a chilling hint
of the not-so-distant future, researchers at the Usenix Security conference
have demonstrated a zero-day vulnerability in your brain. Using a commercial
off-the-shelf brain-computer interface, the researchers have shown that it’s
possible to hack your brain, forcing you to reveal information that you’d rather
keep secret. (A: Now, most folk, really, there’s nothing to
hack, because they’ve already told everybody on their tweets and everything
else and on their Facebook, what they’re up to. So they won’t care, you see.
And they really won’t.)

Now
again, this political correctness just gets crazier and crazier, and it’s meant
to get crazier and crazier. Eventually, as I say, there will be no such thing
as pedophilia or anything else that’s now a crime. Actually, I wonder if it is
a crime anymore, really, you know? Ever since Kinsey paid guys, who worked in
government by the way, a lot of them, they were inspectors for orphanages, to
actually have sex with two month old children, observe their pain and write it
all down very clinically, and used stopwatches and timed them. I’ve put the
links up before from Judith Reisman on it; I’ll try and do that again tonight.

The Kinsey Syndrome - youtube.com

Kinsey's Pedophiles - youtube.com

And
I’m not kidding you, folk. These are the folk that run the world. But it says…

A national legal
alliance is calling on officials at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash.,
to do something to make their campus safe after it was revealed that, because
of its controversial “nondiscrimination” policies, the school was allowing a
grown man to get naked and change into his swimwear right alongside a girls
swim team.

“Little girls should
not be exposed to naked men, period. A Colleges notions about
discrimination don’t change that” says David Hacker, a senior legal counsel for
the Alliance Defending Freedom.

“The idea that the
college and the local district attorney will not act to protect young girls is
appalling. What Americans are seeing here is the poisoned fruit of so-called
‘nondiscrimination’ laws and policies. Placing this man’s proclivities ahead of
protecting little girls is beyond acceptable.” (A: And that hits
it right on the head, you see. This is the technique that they use, as
they do away with YOUR rights and promote the PERV’s rights, you see.)

Nevertheless, a
school spokesman told WND the school would make sure “transgendered
individuals” would continue to have access to the women’s locker room, and the
school would uphold “civil rights” for all. (A: Now, what is a
transgendered individual? This guy had all his guy stuff on him. It doesn’t
matter how he pretends or thinks he is in his head or wants to be seen, you
know.)

“I mean, uh, at this
point, too, we have established a, um, privacy screens. These measures should
offer everyone more privacy,” the school spokesman said.

ADF jumped into
action when it discovered the situation by sending the school a letter warning
of the possible consequences of failing to act.

The letter to Matt
Newman, recreation director, and Art Costantino, vice president of student
affairs, pointed out that the school’s pool and locker rooms are used by swim
teams from Capital High School and Olympia High School, as well as children
with Evergreen Swim Club and the Aquatics Academy.

“Most of these
students are minors, and range from ages 6 to 18,” (A: ...and they
have to watch this guy displaying his genitalia. Back with more after this
break.)

Hi
folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, saying things as they are,
regardless of the PC and the Frankfurt school and all the other ones, and the
United Nations, etc., that are determined to destroy logic and common sense and
sanity its very self. But here’s a school I’m talking about in the US and it
says…

The letter said. “On
several occasions recently, the children saw a naked man in the women’s locker
room sauna who was displaying his male genitalia. The children saw him through
the sauna’s glass door, which allowed him (A: ...the man...) a
plain view of the young girls while they were changing. The children notified
their swim coach, who called police.”

The letter explained
that the man, identified as Evergreen student Colleen Francis, age 45, “to be
the man in the women’s locker room.” (A: You always go for your
victims, eh; this would be a… late student.)

“Sources indicate
that Francis believes he is a woman, even though he is biologically a man.
According to the police report, despite Francis’s obvious violation of
Washington’s indecent exposure statute, Wash. Rev. Code 91.88.010, the local
district attorney declined to pursue charges,” the letter said.

“We are aware
Evergreen intends to allow Francis to continue to use the women’s locker room
pursuant to its nondiscrimination policy,” the letter said. (A:
So you have to put up with the pervs, you see. And this guy believes, you
know... what do you mean, he thinks he’s a woman? He’s got all the
biological stuff… I’ve known people who thought that they were God; one guy
thought he was God once; he did get carted off, you know. And another one who
thought he was the devil. Today you’ll meet lots of people, women especially,
who think they were Cleopatra in previous lives. I’ve met a few of them, but I
could never afford all the milk to fill up their baths, you know.)

However, the legal
team warns the college that the situation “endangers the young girls who use
Evergreen’s locker room and pool.”

“If harm befalls one
of these students, Evergreen and its employees may be held liable for damages.
Evergreen has an ‘affirmative duty to use ordinary care to keep the premises in
a reasonably safe condition.’”

The lawyers said
that letting a grown man use the women’s locker room and expose himself “while
young girls are changing demonstrates a clear failure to keep Evergreen’s
premises in a safe condition.” (A: Well, all the pervs have to
say now is, well I look like a man but I
feel like a woman. [Alan laughing.] And that’s it, they’re
safe.)

“Placing someone in
a known danger with deliberate indifference to her personal, physical safety
violates her Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United State Constitution,”
the letter said.

ADF officials, who
had been alerted to the situation by parents concerned for their children’s
safety, told the school: “Any reasonable person would view this as dangerous to
the young girls involved. (A: Well, you’re not dealing with reason.
You’re dealing with lawyers and agendas by the United Nations, eh.) The
fact that this individual was sitting in plain view of young girls changing
into their swimsuits puts you and Evergreen on notice of possible future harm.”

The alliance said
the school’s installation of curtains with instructions that girls change
behind them “does not solve the problem.”

The police report
notes that the person (A: You know, this guy...) was “sitting with
(A: ...HIS...) her [sic] legs open with (A: ...HIS...
They say... ‘her’, you know.) her (A: Why do the media say
this? This guy is a guy, right?...) male genitalia showing.”

A swim coach who
made the report said that girls 6 to 18 years of age were present.

And
that’s the world they’re bringing in for everyone, as they destroy all that was
to bring in the new. All that was made imperfect… That’s what they claim, in
the ancient mysteries, ancient, very old stuff – that they would destroy all that was, and perfect that that
was left imperfect. If you want to study it for yourself it’s a long,
long history. And it’s on a roll now, folks. And you can trace it all
down through the ages to the present. It’s very real. And you’ve all been
affected by it. In fact, your own indoctrination and your own entertainment
comes from them too.

Well
from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God
or your Gods GO with you.