Saturday, March 31, 2012

The only reason the Illuminati are running rings around the anglo-germanic branch of the white race, is because of the lack of awareness of most whites. White racism is a creation of the Illuminati. Black dislike of whites is a reaction to the effects of racism.
You have to look beyond the surface to find the correct cause of things. Racism has allowed the Illuminati to use most whites as their stooges, in the process of subjugating and owning the world. When whites stop being racist, the power of the Illuminati will end. But this can’t happen because to many whites, benefit from the unjust way the world is currently set up. That’s why the libertarian movement can’t make a real difference.
White racism is a trick that the Illuminati plays, and many libertarians fall for, which prevents whites from focusing on the enemy within. They know, that all those gun toting whites that so love freedom, are seeing blacks in the minds eye when they practice their gun craft on the range.
As long they keep thinking of shooting blacks, the libertarians pose no threat to their real enemy at all. Judging from many of the posts and comments on Infowars, the Illuminati has nothing to worry about, as far as the libertarian movement is concerned, because it is mainly composed of hypocritical racists, who love to hate blacks, far more than they hate the Illuminati.
The Truthorator
I’ll Be Black…

IN just one month's span there's also: Rekia Boyd- a Black woman shot to death by a Chicago Cop in an incident where no weapon was found.

Anna Brown incident in St Louis- who went to a hospital complaining that her legs were in serious pain- but she was a Black homeless woman, so the hospital called the cops who arrested her. When she told them she couldn't walk they dragged her into the police station & then left her on a cold cell floor - where she died of blood clots- from her legs that lodged in her heart- shortly there after.

So in a month's time there's Trayvon & these 2 sisters & that's only the ones we know of.

At Common Dreams site many supposed liberal / progressives commentors [of article's on Trayvon's case posted @ CD] apparently didn't like my tone RE: how this whole Trayvon case is being spun in the MSNM media. One person even accused me of playing the so-called 'Race-Card'. So I threw out this challenge: Name the last time they could recall the cops in the USA shooting [or beating] to death an unarmed non-violent white person since Kent State in 1970. - One person [the same one who said I was playing the 'Race-Card'] told of an incident involving an 'upset' white guy w a KNIFE [Duh-UH!]. Another talked about the Ruby ridge incident which involved a shoot-out & prolonged armed stand-off w FBI, & ATF [Duh-UH!] & also an off-duty cop who killed his wife & her boy-friend[Duh-UH!].

I told them that I, off the top of my head, could name 10-12 incidents [& probably more than 2 dozen if I really did some research] of cops involved in the suspect shooting deaths of unarmed Blacks in just the past 10-15yrs.

White folks can talk about a fairy-tale so-called 'Post-Racial' USA & accuse Blacks who say that's a bunch of BS- of playing the 'Race-Card' all they want to. Until most whites get at-least half as upset & outraged about Trayvon's murder & Rekia's killing & Anna's negligent homicide [& Aiyana Jones, Oscar Grant, Sean Bell, Kathryn Johnston, Timothy Stansbury, Ousmane Zongo, & Amadou Diallo, the New Orleans / Katrina Danziger Bridge Murders, & on & on & on...] as so many of them [including so-called 'liberals' ] were/are over the OJ's acquittal, there will NEVER be a so-called post-racial USA!

The entire landscape of criminal justice in America was shaped by Ronald Reagan. The prison-building boom, the exponential increase in the number of Americans behind bars, the billions poured down the drain in the so-called war on drugs, the racial-profiling scandal on the nation’s highways, the attacks on habeas corpus and the exclusionary rule, the exaggerated hero worship of the police officer – all of these can be laid at Reagan’s doorstep. The law-and-order debate in America has always been a spawning ground for demagoguery, but the forces of reason and dispassion had the upper hand for much of the middle decades of the last century. Reagan helped make sure that criminal justice questions would close out the century steeped in hysteria. Since he established crime as a potent wedge issue, politicians across the country have been falling over one another to press for tougher criminal statutes, whether they make sense or not.
The Man Who Sold the World, Ronald Reagan and the Betrayal of Main Street America
by William Kleinknecht

The problem with Infowars analysis of Obama’s 2012 election strategy, is that Obama does not need to race bait to win the next election. Romney is such a poor opponent and Ron Paul has been contained by his own party. So Obama is likely to win regardless.
If anything the Trayvon case could back fire against Obama, as it divides the nation along racial lines causing many white and white hispanic democrats to vote for a white candidate, in support of Zimmerman.
It’s highly unlikely that whites will vote for Obama out of guilt, over the Trayvon issue. The Infowars race baiting spin on the Trayvon case, is just a way of pandering to its core followers.
There are much bigger issues, that the Trayvon murder raises. Namely the way the blacks are being criminalized in the USA. It’s high time the remaining racial injustices in America are addressed. Alex needs to stop oversimplifying the matter. It’s not all about whites being evil. It’s about the systematic criminalization and destruction of the black male in America. This effects the lives of all black people in the country. Everything that Alex claims he is fighting against and wants to prevent from happening to whites, has been happening to blacks for decades and also centuries. If whites want to make their country better, stop giving the powers that be a group to practice their evil on.
If the white supporters of Alex Jones had any sense they would be fighting for Zimmerman’s arrest. Because if Zimmerman get’s off it will result in more gun control and the self defense and stand your ground laws being changed. It will also give cops even more of a power trip, that they can get away with anything. Whites just don’t seem to understand that they need to support the civil rights of blacks if they want to prevent their own rights being taken away. Ignorance of this simple fact is why Alex and his followers are losing the fight.
The NWO is counting on the fact that the range of genuine concern of the libertarian movement will remain to narrow to care about actual injustices as they happen to others. As long as whites don’t care about racism and injustice towards blacks, they will never be able to protect it for themselves.
Why isn’t Alex Jones mentioning any of the evidence against Zimmerman. Stop being so damn biased Alex. Represent both sides of the evidence, if you are against stoking a race war. Help you own core followers to see both sides and to see, the evidence that supports Zimmermans guilt, not just his innocence.
If you can’t do that, you are the one stoking the other side of what could become a race war. So stop being such a d___ hypocrite. Obama is a con man , but this is one con he does not need to run to get re-elected.

Yeh, that’s what Alex is trying to claim to give more credence to his hypocritical stance on Trayvon. A week ago he was saying it was about re-election. But since that looks it might back fire he is upping the anti now and claiming its about declaring martial law to postpone the election etc.
Obama does not need to postpone and election he is going to win anyway. And if anyone is stoking a race war right now it is Alex Jones himself, inflaming his own core following. So maybe if people like you would and Alex would calm down and show more concern for justice, the race war that you claim Obama is stoking, but which Infowars is stoking more, won’t happen.
Infowars has more need of it than Obama does, to bring the NWO out into the open. Maybe that would be a good thing to expose them, but just be clear why things are really being said, before you jump to simplistic conclusions. If a race war did come that resulted in martial law, finally whites would understand what blacks are complaining about. So go for it sucker.

__________

Cynical Negro - 03/29/2012 - 14:13

I’m still laughing at how Drudge, Fox News, Infowars, and the mainstream media convinced the public that “Zimmerman” was a Latin surname.

Zimmerman’s father, Robert Zimmerman, is a retired Orange County magistrate judge. Which explains why Zimmerman got away with his previous run-ins with the law, and why the cops covered it up from Trayvon’s family.

Trayvon Martin was put in a morgue for 3 days as 'John Doe' after mom reported him missing.

The Skin-head governor of Florida, Rick Scott, has appointed a racist special prosecutor “with the intent of toning down the rhetoric and preserving the integrity of this investigation.”

The officer in charge of the Trayvon murder scene was the same officer who failed to arrest a police lieutenant’s son who was videotaped attacking a black homeless man. The police lieutenant’s son was later arrested after local news broke the story.

The cops were witness tampering and ignoring witnesses that don’t go along with their narrative.

They’re paying off thirsty house negroes to be character witnesses for Zimmerman.

There is police and cellphone recordings all over the place clearly showing that Zimmerman was the initial AGGRESSOR!

Florida is thoroughly corrupt, and thoroughly RACIST!
You will see a lot of these FOOLS wearing hoodies, but the “Greek,” Freemasonic, Boule, sellout, HOUSE NEGROES won’t dare run ruffshod over FL state law and prosecute Zimmerman, and risk Obama losing this SWING STATE!

From TheGrio.com [@ www.thegrio.com/specials/trayvon-martin/robert-j-zimmerman-trayvon-shoot...]: 'George Zimmerman's father served as a Supreme Court magistrate in the Virginia court system until five years ago, serving as a court officer who dealt with criminal cases.' - Note Zimmerman's pops lives in a nearby community.
Also from TheGrio.com 'Surveillance video of George Zimmerman walking into the Sanford police department shows none of the injuries Zimmerman's supporters claim he suffered during his "life and death struggle" with Trayvon Martin. There are no [obvious] blood or gashes that are visible on the back of Zimmerman's head. And The tape does not show Zimmerman with a visibly broken or even bloody nose [nor bloody shirt].
The tape could prove damaging to the narrative being put forward by the Sanford police department and Zimmerman supporters, since it shows an uninjured, and seemingly unperturbed, Zimmerman walking into the station with police.
See the tape [@ www.thegrio.com/specials/trayvon-martin/trayvon-martin-case-surveillance... ] - MSNBC's Larrry O'Donell & his guest go on to say that not only did the Sanford Police lead homicide investigator come to the scene that Sunday night of Feb 26th - But also the Police Chief! - And afterwards they both met with the county DA! Apparently it was the Police Chief & the DA that made the decison to release Zimmerman.
So did the lead investigator, the police chief, & the DA pow-wow w Zimmerman's dad, who's a retired hi-Magistrate in Virginia, & then released Zimmerman after concocting this suspect story [IE: LIE] aboutTrayvon putting the beat-down on a guy that out-weighed him by 50 - 80 lbs- apparently w only 1 arm- since Trayvon was on the phone w his girl-friend at the time???

In Fact- Listening to the closest impartial witness to the scene of the crime-it damn near sounds like Zimmerman executed Trayvon-&- then the cover began immediately afterwards - Note: } Mary Cutcher, who lived closest to where Zimmerman shot Trayvon to death said- 'I heard a young boy crying & then a gun-shot & then the crying stopped. To me mind if it had been Zimmerman crying - he would have continued crying after the gun-shot. I've tried to tell this to the Police several times but they refuse to take my statement...' [Mary Cutcher, whose back door was steps away from where Trayvon was shot, said she heard a boy crying, then a gunshot, then the crying stopped. - “I heard someone crying – not boo-hoo crying, but scared or terrified or hurt maybe,” said Cutcher. “To me, it was a child.” - Cutcher and her roommate said they rushed outside to see Zimmerman Standing Over Trayvon, with one foot on either side of Trayvon’s body. In one hand, Zimmerman held a .9 mm handgun, his other hand was on Trayvon, who was face down in the grass. ] Note: http://sandrarose.com/2012/03/911-call-trayvon-martin-cried-for-help-bef...

The war on our social services hasn't ended with 2012. U.S. House of Representative members approve a plan to destroy Medicare, Medicaid, and food stamps. It is a part of a budget resolution. This resolution wants to have the privatization of Medicare, the elimination of Medicaid, food stamps, and many other federal entitlements benefits. This resolution represents both parties' goal of slashing spending on social programs. All Republicans (except 10 people) majority in the House supported the resolution. Those 10 who oppose it wanted even bigger cuts, which is sick. As if the huge cuts weren't enough for some reactionaries. Democrats voted against the resolution, but they offer less drastic cuts in spending (and token tax increases on the wealthy). No resolution from both parties desire to increase spending, so the American economy can radically improve in the fifth year of economic slump and mass unemployment. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin is the House Budget Committee Chairman. He called fort he abolition of Medicare. Medicare is a successful program that helps out the elderly. It was passed by Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1965. The current budget plan passed the House, but not the Senate. This year's resolution is more sweeping and reactionary. The reason is that it wants 5.3 trillion dollars in spending cuts over the next decades. The supporters of this plan wants to reduce the federal deifict, but the bulk of the resolution will go to reward the wealthy with tax breaks (the abolition of the estate tax and the Alternative mininum tax. This can make the Bush tax cuts for the super rich permanent and lower the top inocme tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent). The major spending cuts targets programs for the poor and the lower paid sections of the working class. According to a study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 62 percent of the $5.3 trillion in spending cuts come from “programs that serve people of limited means.” If implemented, the cuts would drastically increase income inequality and poverty. The resolution plans for record cuts in Medicaid, subsidies for low to moderate income people, and 134 billion dollar cuts in food stamps. There are cuts in Pell grants and other programs that help low income college students. This proposal is again a disgrace and satanic in my opinion. The budget will cut 200,000 children from Head Start, deny food stamps or WIC food commodities to 1.8 million infants, children, and pregnant plus nursing women. There are more cuts in transportation, federal employee, etc. The lesson here is this plan is about austerity period. They or the reactionaries worship deficit reduction and they don't care about the poor literally. In order to accomplish this goal, the Ryan plan would raise the age of eligibility for Medicare from 65 to 67, and end Medicare as a federal entitlement for all those now younger than 55. Anyone who turns 65 after 2023 would be relegated to buying private health insurance with a government grant that would be capped, shifting costs to the individual. Unlike last year, however, Ryan modified his Medicare plan slightly to obtain a Democratic co-sponsor, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon. The Ryan-Wyden plan would give those under 55 the option to stay with traditional Medicare, but only under financing options that would make the federal program unviable. The House rejected alternatives to the extreme Ryan plan. This is all the more reason why we should have progressive policies in terms of helping human beings and taxation policies. These are the same policies that Ron Paul, Alex Jones, and the Austrian Economic crew promotes. They promote a gradual banning of any federal public program to help society period. This is why that crew says that we can't do it all right away, but in a slow process. The Republican Study Group even wanted more cuts since that group is made up of Tea Party activists.

The more information that comes out about Zimmerman, the more the truth can come about. Zimmerman was convicted of assaulting a woman and assaulting a police officer. Yet, we don't hear anything about from reactionaries at all. Joe Oliver is the defender of the killer George Zimmerman. It doesn't take a genius to figure out about how he thinks about issues of race. LOL. I don't take shots. I show the truth. Now, we know that Oliver advances white supremacy since he denies that the c word is a slur and he tries to downplay of murder of the innocent black teenager named Trayvon Martin. He won't even expose white supremacy publicly. His manerisms and his attitude denotes an acceptance of corporate culture. Black people ought to never adhere nor submit to the status quo or the tranquilizing drug of gradualism as Dr. Martin Luther King said before. We should submit to strength, righteousness, peace, and justice. These awe inspiring concept can arose strength, inspire thinking, and move hearts foward into constructive activities. Now, Oliver didn't spend a lot of time with Zimmerman. Oliver was just an ex co-worker of Zimmerman. These racist hypocrites lecture about the Stand your ground law, but the Florida police arrested James Dooley (a black male). See, Dooley claims the stand your ground law as his defense. The Stand your ground law didn't prevent Dooley from experiencing an arrest, due process, and a criminal charge. Why not Zimmerman? We know the answer to that question. So, Zimmerman should have due process and be arrested within the concept of probable cause. The evil done to Trayvon Martin is occuring now against brothers and sisters throughout the world not just in the wilderness called America. When a criminal murders an unarmed black person with no criminal record at all, then we have a problem here. People of numerous backgrounds and ethnicities are speaking up for Trayvon Martin. The liars like Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity won't report on a black person (from Cameroon) being attacked with acid from a white racist either in the UK. There was a black girl being assaulted in South Carolina while she was just playing soccer. This is an epedemic of violent attacks by evil, degenerate souls. Infowars.com is so hypocritical to condemn Al Sharpton's civil disobedience calls in response to the murder of Trayvon Martin, but they advocate civil disobedience (in other cases) to oppose the new world order agenda. Infowars.com can cry about the New BPP (who didn't attack anyone period in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin murder. I don't agree with the New BPP in every issue, but they are right to promote self defense and black cultural solidarity), but they refuse to expose Ron Paul's hatred of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Now, Alex Jones is promoting the slander that Barack Obama wants to stir a race war. What? Barack Obama isn't perfect and he deserves legitimate criticism on foreign policy, his refusal to advance a public option, his support of the Patriot Act, and many other issues. Although, even the President isn't trying to forment a racial war. It is true that the international bankers wants a divide and conquer strategy along class and ethnic lines, but a black person promoting their own cultural identity isn't about racism nor advancing evil divisions at all. No one call all white people devils regardless of what Jones cries about. What people that look like me mention is that white supremacy is real and it ought to be obliterated from the face of the Earth period. Alex Jones and Ron Paul refuse to expose how eugenicists historically (then and now) advance the anti-immigration agenda. Police brutality and police repression of human rights are key ingredients of the new world order agenda too. I don't agree with fascism, racism, or Communism. I just agree with common sense and true harmony (that doesn't relate to ignoing our problems, but enacting militant steps in order for our complications to be solved diligently). People don't want revenge or vengeance. Individuals just seek out justice. Morality isn't just about following just laws. It's about following compassion, tolerance, and true love for your fellow man. God's Spirit would want us to improve our conduct, to have the journey of spiritual growth, and to eat the manna of unconquerable truth.

One aspect of popular culture is the control of TV networks. One kingpin in America is Sumner Redstone. He controls VH1, MTV, and yes even BET. Redstone admits that his major goal is to make a profit. He's a pure capitalist and these networks heavily benefit by promoting gross, false stereotypes, mayhem, and social nihilism on television. Even 20 years ago, the stuff back then was more tolerable than today. We live in a new time and a new age where anti-intellectualism is promoted. Tons of young and old human beings have insecurities, they use a record amount of prescription drugs (for anxeity or depression. I know colleagues all of the time of many background saying to me straight up that I need to take prescription drugs everyday for an issue). Redstone also owns Viacom and CBS, so he is a very powerful man. Like many people like him, he funds charities and other likeminded avenues to cover up the obscene programming in those various networks. Obscenity isn't just about obscene imagery or anti-moral rhetoric, but the war on terror. The war on terror is an obscenity. The actions of military industrial complex, the privatized prison system, and the war on Drugs are obscenities in our world as well. They (or the corporate elite) don't care about the common people. If they did, they would advocate the redistribution of the wealth to help people and the elimination of the Beast system domination the globe presently. It isn't just people like Redstone, but there are tons of other kingpins of numerous backgrounds that agree with the idea that society must confirm to some pop star image. The truth is that more folks are waking up about Secret Societies, popular culture, life in general, and the corporate executives dominating the Babylon of the entertainment industry. We know the stories of the secret stories of celebrities and so-called entertainment stars. This industry have their sellout agents. What I have learned is that the overt sellouts like Jesse Lee Peterson aren't the real threats since we know how to expose them. The dangerous sellout is the chameleon. The chameleon is a prized agent of the elite. This sellout knows the games, and tries to unite with the community. On the other hand, behind the scenes, this person promotes violence, drug usage for recreational purposes, hatred of women, the emasculation of men, and profanity (in societal culture). These types of sellouts (They have an obsession with claiming to be pro-black, but won't deal with their own people in a real, forthright fashion of self-improvement without evil. Some of them refuse to date or marry their own people for foolish reasons while claiming to be pro-black. That's a load of garbage on their part. These types of found in Hollywood. I don't have to mention their names, because their names are well known like so many celebrities) are a part of the industry too. The sellouts cry and say that we're judging them on their eccetic tastes. No. We aren't since there is no sin in being different, having diverse interests, speaking with an unique accent, speaking with great, eloquent diction, honestly accepting an alternative political philosophy, and loving intellectual hobbies. It is not sin to be you or to be what you are born to be with love and tolerance. Yet, it's a sin to treat your own race as socially inferior (expressing fear or disgust toward your own people), while treating the white race with worship, unlimited respect & support, and genuflection. That's the point. It's not how someone talks like. It's how someone acts like. We should promote people in a more unique light. We don't need to sugarcoat problems, but we should show the world our lawyers, doctors, engineers, plumbers, teachers, preachers, althetes (who don't submit to the world), and other leaders in our community.

I think that Vigilant Citizen and other sites plus people have done an excellent job in exposing this character named Raffles van Exel. He hanged out with Hollywood celebrities and corporate bigwigs like Clive Davis. He's been called an insider. We know about his scandals as well. He's been accused of being a drug dealer and exploiter of the suffers of drug addiction. He even was around Michael Jackson during Micheal's trials and tribulations. He is pictured with the self-hater, confused man OJ Simpson. Near the time of Whitney Houston's passing on home, Raffles van Excel (yes, he worked with Brandy's little brother Ray J) was around her. Van Exel was around the following people before they died: Peter Lopez, Nicole Simpson, Mike DiLeo (or Michael Jackson's ex-manager), Michael Jackson, etc. Researchers found out that the sick man Raffles took pictures of Whitney in her casket and then sent these pictures to the National Inquirer. Raffles admitted to taking evidence from Whitney's room. Why would he do that. He has no ties familially to the Houston family. Yet, he has this much access to the celebrity community. Some speculate that there is more to the story than meets the eye (or he might of been an insider that facilitates the sacrifice of stars). Raffles van Exel said that he had to remove items from the room in order for the room to be emptied. He didn't admit the types of items that were removed from her room. The Los Angeles County Coroner's Officer said that Whitney Houston died of an accidental drowning in a hotel bathtub with the effects of an atherosclerotic heart disease and cocaine use. This is interesting since women have high rates of experiencing heart disease symptoms in America (not just men). The investigation of Houston's death is still ongoing. Van Exel getting rid of some of the evidence can be potentially a case of obstruction of justice. If people like me know of this information, the elite knows completely about this story. He said "Someone had to do it" which is creepy to say the least. The man is obviously a slick exploiter and investigator of the celebrity community. In other words, he's an informant with connections with possible drug running. Raffles isn't the only person that should be exposed. This situation is much bigger than just one man. Everyone involved should be exposed publicly.

There is nothing wrong with real religion and real spirituality. I don't agree with the 501 c 3 church agenda, because it allows the state to dominate religious expression in the church. Religious freedom should be absolute and paramountly promoted in all religious places. Most people realize that lewdness, prejudice, unjust hatred, deception, murder, adultery, and other actions are morally wrong. The moral relativism that is promoted in society is so common place in Western society that this vice is found in political sphere in the world (not just in America). The good news is that God gives people an open invitation to repent of their sins before death, so they can meet up with God Almighty in a good space. Repent and changing your ways are better than living the life of sin and corruption. People know the truth even in the young generation of Generation Y, Z, and new kids from Generation Alpha. Media propaganda isn't just shown by FOX News as exposed via the documentary "OUTFOXED: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism." It exists among the military industrial complex, foreign government, and transnational corporations globally. 9/11 was the major quintessential event that increased the growth of the slick, so-called "benevolent" Western police state in the world. That is why you see the breaking up of our civil liberties and the constant bashing of people possessing firearms legally in their own homes. A law abiding man or a law abiding woman has the right to defend their family. It doesn't take a genius to realize any form of tyranny has occured in human history utilized the tactics of stealing weapons from innocent human beings. The JPFO website has thoroughly described that historical fact from the history of the Nazis to the evil Armenian genocide period. We still have secret, occult societies like the Order of Death (or Skulls and Bones), the Bohemian Grove, and Freemasonry whose membership make up some of the movers and shakers of the world. The CFR is a mid level organization that fronts for more powerful groups like the Bilderbergers, the Pilgrim Society, and the Vatican/Jesuit network with tons of international influence of world affairs. The FDA or the Food and Drug Administration deals with regulating the spreading of foods and drugs inside of America. Now, they deny BPA as a dangerous substance when BPA has been complicit in harmful risk factors among human beings. For example, scientists have found that BPA can increase the risk of depression, infertility, breast cancer, etc. Many nations other than America ban BPA because of its dangerous composition. So, we have a lot of work to. Yet, we will win in the end. The truth always wins out.

Do you mean he is truly an investigator on the elites’ behalf or that he is there to pretend to investigate and presumably do covert questionable things?
The fact that the elite are, according to your source, hiring him, screams volumes. That along with the fact that his behavior is contradictory (becoming “friends” with almost-dead celebrities and “consoling” their grieving families while appearing to use their death and fame to profit and promote himself) i.e. shady, tells me he is doing dirty work for the elite, then.
It’s the two things together, if your source is correct, that seem to point to Illuminati. “weeping unicorn” on here called him an “ndoki”:http://vigilantcitizen.com/musicbusiness/whitney-houston-and-the-2012-grammy-awards-mega-ritual/comment-page-1/#comment-170478
I looked up more on ndokis and added my comments below that.

Also Whitney, around 3:02 when Diane points out the headlines which were saying she was dying, says, “When they said I died, I did. I’d changed my mind,” then she smiles satisfiedly at the almost accusatory Diane. “I changed my mind. Yup, I didn’t want to look like the rest of them. I didn’t want to be like them. It frightened me. I didn’t ever want to be in the realm of where I’m caught in a mold and I can’t get out. Never. That’s over. I’m beyond it.” Later she says, “I enjoy what I do, I love to sing, but it’s just not fun anymore. … People are different in the industry. It’s about the money. It’s about ‘get it fast’.”

@VC
You are the super sleuth and I’m so glad you and the guy from Forbes are exposing that Raffles character. Ever since the late 80′s early 90′s I’ve always thought he was a weird, over-ambitious self-promoting wannabe. During that time, every now and then a fluff piece about him would appear in the entertainment section of the Chicago Defender newspaper (a local African American paper). His name was Raffles DAWSON and the story always was about him making some kinda triumphant return home to Chicago from Denmark where he supposedly had this illustrious career and according to him. Claiming he was about to be this huge break out star in America. Supposedly some ultimate showman. However nothing ever materialized. Nothing but another article in the Defender saying the same thing. Back then it wasn’t difficult to get Mr. Calloway to do a article on and up and coming artist. He was an elderly, old school entertainment critic that believed in helping youngsters get their start in the businessSo he’s definitely a con man and definitely desperate (and over eager) enough to get tangled up in the shady side of hollywierd.

I think that this man is an overseer for the sacrafices commited by the elite. I have been studying so much into this stuff that I think im crazy myself. I have a friend in the business who assists with alot of behind the scenes production because hes quote “a genius but doesnt have the superstardom required to be on camera.” Its not that he doesnt have the superstardom…its that hes not willing to sell his soul for a buck. Anyway, he told me that this man has no ties to film or music whatsoever but he is always there as a form of condolence for the family. He also some how becomes friends with celebrities a year before they are murdered or pass away. My friend tells me that he is paid a RIDICULOUS amount of money to be the elites “private investigator.” Mainly, if there is a murder or an attempted murder on a celebrity, this guy is sent there first incase a police officer or anyone else who isnt associated with the elite cant make it on time.

You forgot to mention LBJ yapping at how "bipartisan" his Warren Commission was. As if it mattered how many Republicans or Democrats were represented on a panel investigating the violent death of the POTUS. His selections were only intended to "legitimize" a phony "investigation" with a predetermined outcome. LBJ is heard on tape cajoling Sen. Russell to be "my man" on the Warren Commission, and said "all you (Russell) have to﻿ do is evaluate a Hoover report he's already made!"

Another reason the Warren Commission hasn't stood the test of time is the wholly implausible motive they attributed to Oswald. To wit: "He sought for himself a place in history- a role as the 'Great Man' who would be recognized as having been in advance of﻿ his times."
So..Oswald supposedly killed the leader of the Free World to achieve his 'place in history', yet he DENIED responsibility for the act that would have put him in that place?
Totally incongruous w/common sense.

I agree with Bumper Sticker – Zimmerman was not a police officer, and was told by 911 dispatcher to stop pursuing Trayvon. That should have been the end of it. My neighborhood isn’t gated, and my neighbors all watch out for each other, but it is the height of stupidity, in this day and age, to follow a stranger who may or may not be armed, just to see if they belong there or not. I also thought i had read somewhere that Zimmerman spotted Trayvon outside a store…gated communities have stores inside them now? really? interesting…but still not pertinent to the fact that Zimmerman had no right to pursue anyone, especially after being told to stop. Neighborhood watch groups are told to watch and report – not stalk and harrass.

I don;’t think so. It’s no ones job to stick thier noses in anyone’s business! Bullshit!
Let me tell you somthing bud, If I was Trayvon and I was walking home with no bad intentions, with a pop in my hand and some f*ckin thug ex cop tried to intimidate me or cause shit with me, I would’ve mouthed him off or better yet, I would pre emptivly attack him to defend myself.
Are you implying that because Trayvon approached Zimmerman, that he had bad intentions? Your ignorant if that’s the case. When I walk down the street I don’t allow anyone to intimidate me, I’m 5’6 and have had to learn how to stand up for myself because if you don’t people will exploit your weakness, it’sd at the point now where if someone looks at me for more than 3 seconds I question them, why are you looking at me, do I know you?
The point is, it’s up to each individual to protect themselves not some neighbourhood watch ex cop thug! It’s no ones job to protect me but MY OWN!

Of course there is a bounty on Zimmernan’s head, he got away with murder. There wouldn’t be any vigilantes if Zimmerman was arrested, yet people are out there defending Zimmerman are really inhuman. He’s not hooded thug you moron, he’s a 17 year old kid. Zimmerman on the other hand has a criminal record and is a over-zealous neighborhood watchman.
Zimmerman needs to be arrested and needs to be put on trial.

Why did you take the video down? People need to hear what is happening daily in our halls and offices of government. I heard Rick loud and clear and the fact that this video has been removed is further evidence of the truth.
Is this the kind a man that we want looking out for our best interests? I'm offended by everything that this man stands for, I am outraged by his stance on issues of women's health, the economy and education. And now, I know loud and clear where he stands as it relates to black people.

...smh..RACISM/RACISTS in UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has truly reared its ugly head in the "purist of forms" during the Presidency of Barak Obama (billboards, articles, headlines, Tea Party, bumperstickers, t-shirts, forums, Fox News, magazine covers, etc.) they have thrown the kitchen sink and all its contents at this man, yet he still "RISE"........because, God Sits High and Look Low!!!

Racism is not in an resurgence nor has it recently reared it's ugly head because RACISM has never left America.Racism did not START nor will it END with Obama so anyone that act as if Obama is the catalyst to this issue really just have not been paying attention.....

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Yet despite that fact, in 2008 all of the third party and independent presidential candidates combined -- including Ralph Nader and Chuck Baldwin -- got a mere one percent of the friggin vote!

This will continue to be the case until the countless millions of people who reportedly "want" what they already have stop falling hook, line and sinker for the bull___t "wasted vote/lesser of two evils" argument every single election season.

Yes, I'm in that 1-2% bracket--voted for McKinney.

The arugment I always got from the MSM demo/repubs--"Do you really expect your candidate to win? Hardly anyone will vote for her."
These box thinkers, like SO MANY of the sheep, are more concerned with who most people in the herd will be voting for, they don't consider who they feel would be a good candidate. The herd mentality is ground into the peeps at an early age: Don't think for yourself, think what everyone else thinks. If everyone would just make their own decision and not care about what the herd is going to do--you would have 3, or more parties representing the people.

The Mainstream Media has thinking for yourself equated with the "lone nut", the loner, the Oswald. People need to just listen to their own mind, form their own opinions, and forget the herd. The herd, are manipulated and lost.

Geolibertarian:
To all you self-righteous, insult-spewing, race-obsessed “liberals” out there who shamelessly wrap in the flag of “anti-racism” virtually each and every corporate fascist economic policy, Bush-style police state policy and imperialist foreign policy the Democrat-controlled Congress and White House propose, perpetuate or expand, I have a few questions for you:

If you’re as concerned with exposing and eliminating “racism” as you would have everyone believe, why do neither you nor the General Electric-financed Thought Police at MSNBC speak a word of protest against Obama's continuation of the racist drug war?

Why no word of protest against Obama's continuation and -- in the case of Afghanistan, Pakistan and other nations -- expansion of Bush’s terroristic war on “brown people”?

Why no word of protest against Obama's plan to impose IMF-style austerity measures on behalf of his Wall Street cronies, particularly in view of the fact that these measures will fall harder on poor black communities than on any other sector of society?

Why no word of protest against the anti-labor/pro-land speculation tax system that also falls hardest on poor black communities?

http://savingcommunities.org/issues/race.html

Why no word of protest against how neither Obama nor Democratic Congressional “leaders” have done anything (legislatively, not rhetorically!) to reverse the NAFTA-induced offshoring of countless millions of jobs -- yet another engineered trend that, as any black person from Detroit will readily attest, falls harder on poor, inner-city blacks than anyone else?

Why do you ignore the eery obsession that many of today’s limousine liberals continue to have with eugenics?

And last but certainly not least, why do you ignore the shameful, decades-old tradition among aristocrat-funded “foundations” -- particularly the Ford Foundation -- of employing the divide-and-rule/anti-MLK tactic of fomenting racial hatred within and between the lower and middle classes; and how this historical fact sheds a particularly unflattering light on all the racial provocateuring and hatemongering being engaged in by La Raza -- a hispanic supremecy group which is financed not only by the Ford Foundation, but by overprivileged corporations such as slave goods-selling Wal-Mart and toxic derivatives-peddling Citigroup?

Could it be that the real racists are you, and that your mindless accusations of racism against anyone who dares criticize God’s Obama's corporate fascist economic policies, Bush-style police state policies and terroristic foreign policies are thus nothing more than Freudian projection on your part?

Or is that yet another question you have neither the courage nor intellectual honesty to answer?

Why no word of protest against Obama's plan to impose IMF-style austerity measures on behalf of his Wall Street cronies, particularly in view of the fact that these measures will fall harder on poor black communities than on any other sector of society?

Why no word of protest against the anti-labor/pro-land speculation tax system that also falls hardest on poor black communities?

For the Obama administration, every bit of public space and property is "on the table" - subject to privatization. Transfer of public wealth to private hands seems a White House obsession. Next on the auction block: the nation's public housing stock. "This is gentrification and urban displacement on a gargantuan scale."

President Obama's greatest domestic imperative is the transfer of public wealth and resources to the private sector. He moved tens of trillions of dollars to Wall Street in the guise of rescuing the economy. Hundreds of billions in public funds are scheduled for transfer to private insurance corporations over the next decade or so, masquerading as a health care plan. His support for corporate-backed charter schools and other so-called public-private partnerships has dramatically escalated the privatization of education in the United States. Obama calls it a "Race to the Top." Now, the Obama administration is serving up to corporate vultures the nation's dwindling stock of public housing, with bankers as the ultimate beneficiaries.

The plan is slick, but easy enough to see through - like the president, himself. Dubbed the Transforming Rental Assistance initiative, or TRA, the scheme would allow banks and other speculators to mortgage public housing, and then raise the rents to ten percent above market value. The federal government would make up the difference, pumping the people's money directly into Wall Street accounts. Eventually, of course, the feds will halt or cut back payments, and the properties will revert to the bankers, who will sell them to developers and kick out the tenants. This is gentrification and urban displacement on a gargantuan scale - brought to you by the First Black President.

Imagine! Obama wants to transfer to banks and developers tens of thousands of acres of public-owned urban property - home to 1.2 million families, disproportionately Black and brown - all the while subsidizing the banksters' profits with billions of taxpayer dollars. He would entrust the fates of millions of poor people to the tender mercies of the same criminal-minded class that has destroyed a generation and more of Black homeowners and displaced legions of Black renters from the gentrifying cities.

Obama wants to transform public housing into a Section 8 subsidy program. That is the kiss of death. Section 8 housing has always been underfunded. In New York City, alone, 10,000 Section 8 voucher holders may not be able to pay their rent because the feds won't come up with the funding.

When public housing defaults on payments to the bankers under the Obama scheme, it will be a second bonanza for Wall Street - which is how billions are made in an economy ruled by parasites who create nothing, but charge a fee for everything.

Those are Obama's kind of people. I'm not just talking about the mega-banks and hedge-funders that backed him to the hilt in his presidential campaign. Obama's closest cronies and former clients from Chicago - including senior advisor Valerie Jarret - made their fortunes milking government subsidized housing programs for the poor until the federal government had to step in and pick up the pieces.

If Obama has his way, speculators will descend on all 3,000 of the nation's public housing agencies, bribing every official in sight in a frenzy of corruption over federal land and subsidies. And the poor will start counting the days before they are put out in the street.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.

Can’t happen here? Top academics and eugenicists are calling for what Obama’s science czar once advocatedPaul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Thursday, March 29, 2012

This is the shocking face of China’s brutal one child policy which many academics and pressure groups are now calling to be imposed in the west – the image shows a 9 month old baby lying dead in a bucket, forcibly aborted by Chinese family planning authorities in the town of Moshan, Shandong province.

Because the parents of the baby already had a child, they were hunted down and forced to comply with China’s draconian one child policy. The mother was injected with a poison that induced an abortion, but after the baby was “pulled out inhumanly like a piece of meat,” it was still alive and began to cry before doctors slung the defenseless child into a bucket and left it to die.

The time stamp on the image tells us the baby was killed on Monday. The image began circulating today on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, which has around 260 million members. The story has attracted widespread revulsion directed against the family planning authorities responsible for the murder of the baby.

China’s one child policy is enforced by way of forced abortions, infanticide and compulsory sterilization. In many cases, women are literally kidnapped off the street by state goons from the “Birth Control Office,” driven to government hospitals, drugged, and their child is forcibly aborted.

In one case in 2009, both a young woman and her baby were killed after such an abduction in Liaocheng City.

“According to a Doctor at the hospital where the two died, the young woman was kidnapped by the “Birth Control Office” and taken to the hospital where she was forced to undergo an abortion procedure,” reported the Epoch Times.

“The young woman fought with staff to protect her unborn child however a half a dozen men, pushed her down on a bed and injected her with a drug to induce labor. After the young woman had a still birth, she developed a massive hemorrhage and soon thereafter died.”

The practice of infanticide has its origins in barbaric eras of ancient history, but it is still common is many areas of the world today, including China where the one child policy allied with the social pressure to have boys has resulted in a massive imbalance in the population. Studies have found that 40 million girls are ‘missing’ in China as a result of gender-selective abortion and infanticide. In India, there are 50 million less females for the same reasons.

Advocates of population control, which is nothing more than a disguise for modern day eugenics, have long pressured for the one child policy to be enforced in the west. In 2009, an article written in Canada’s National Post argued for “A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate.”

In his 1977 book Ecoscience, current White House science czar John P. Holdren floated the idea of forced abortions and compulsory sterilization, amongst a raft of other draconian population control measures, all of which would be carried out by a “Planetary Regime”.

As we reported last month, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics authored by top academics at the University of Melbourne argued that abortion should be extended to make the killing of newborn babies permissible, even if the baby is perfectly healthy.

The authors argued that “both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons,” and that because abortion is allowed even when there is no problem with the fetus’ health, “killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.”

The scintilla of hope that we can take from this distressing story is the fact that this baby’s precious few minutes of life before it was murdered were not in vain and in fact could end up meaning more than most people who live to old age. Why? Because as a result of seeing this one image, scores of couples around the world could decide against having an abortion, saving many more babies’ lives in the long run.

The image also serves as a damning condemnation of China’s arcane one child policy, as well as a warning that calls to impose similar population control measures in the west should be forcefully discredited, resisted and rejected at every turn.

This story is an Infowars English-language exclusive.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The

TV NEWS, LAST NIGHT..
police released video of zimmerman being brought into the station.
NO INJURY to the back of his head
NO GRASS-MUD on his red jacket
NO BROKEN NOSE
police behavior was VERY unconcerned, LOOSE body language,
barely a pat down inspection, allowing him to just walk in..
like they all knew him personally on a friendly basis.

I agree with the Congressman and I applaud him for standing up for what he believes, after all we still have free speech even on the floor of Congress. Some of you may not agree with him but he does have the right of self expression. Isn’t this apart of what Alex is fighting for?

IF YOU PUT TOGETHER THE TESTIMONY FORM GEORGE ZIMMERMAN, TRAYVONS GIRLFRIEND AND THE WITNESS WHO SAYS HE SAW TRAYVON ON TOP OF ZIMMERMAN, IT SHOWS THAT ZIMMERMAN IS LYING ABOUT HOW THE FIGHT STARTED.
THE GIRLFRIEND SAYS TRAYVON TOLD HER THAT ZIMMERMAN HAD CAUGHT UP WITH HIM AGAIN. TRAYVON ASKED ZIMMERMAN WHY ARE YOU FOLLOWING ME. ZIMMERMAN SAID WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE. THE BOTH ASKED THIS TO EACHOTHER TWICE. THEN AS TRAYVON WAS ASKING HIM AGAIN HIS WAS CUT OF IN MID-VOICE, BY WHAT TO HER SOUNDED LIKE TRAYVON BEING PUSHED.
IT LOOKS LIKE ZIMMERMAN PUSHED TRAYVON AND THEN TRAYVOM HIT BACK. SO ZIMMERMAN IS LYING ABOUT HAVING PUSHED TRAYVON. ALSO ZIMMERMANS TESTIMONY OVER THE VERBAL EXCHANGE, IS A DEFINITE LIE AS IT WAS HEARD BY THE GIRLFRIEND AND THE WORDS WERE NOT AS ZIMMERMAN PUT THEM AT ALL.
ZIMMERMAN SAYS TRAYVON CAUGHT UP WITH HIM AND SAID “DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM”. ZIMMERMAN SAID “NO” AND TRAYVON SAID “WELL YOU NOW” AND THEN PUNCHED HIM. FIRST OF ALL NO BODY TALKS LIKE THAT. AND SECONDLY THAT JUST DOES NOT MAKE SENSE, BECAUSE TRAYVON WAS TRYING TO ESCAPE HIM AND THE GIRLFRIEND HEARD THE WHOLE CONVERSATION.
AS FAR AS INFOWARS IS CONCERNED THE SECRET OF THE TRAYVON MURDER IS TO ONLY LOOK AT ONE SIDE OF THE EVIDENCE.
LISTON TO GEORGE ZIMMERMAN’S RACIAL SLUT TECNICALLY ANALYZED
youtube.com/watch?v=MQdsJwpSUKw

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Taxes are controversial in the world. They are necessary for the world to promote. Taxes have many purposes. The government of Virginia and the federal use taxes as a means to fund services, make projects, and to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities. The government use taxes collected from individuals and corporations to finance their own operations. Congress is given the right to tax citizens from Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. The income tax is primarily found in the federal government. It’s paid by individuals and corporations. It’s the largest single source of revenue today. Taxation can be used to raise revenue. Revenue is a profit earned by a business, corporation, or the government in general. The Income tax has been legalized by the 16th Amendment. The 16th Amendment created the income tax to be a progressive tax. A progressive tax is a tax that the richer citizens pay more than poorer citizens. For example, hypothetically, a poor person can pay 16 percent of their income taxes and a richer person can pay about 30 percent of income as in the form of an income tax. An income tax is a tax on a yearly income. Corporate income taxes are when corporations pay for money on income. The payroll tax is assessed by the federal government in all 50 states including the District of Colombia. The payroll tax is one major way that the federal government can get revenues. These taxes are used to pay for Social Security, Medicare, and other forms of insurance. The payroll tax is regressive. This means that lower income person pay more than higher income persons. For example, a person making about 200,000 dollars a year can pay the same Social Security tax as someone earner over 97,000 a year. Custom duties are tariffs or taxes on the imports of goods sent into America. For example, if a good comes into America, there is a tariff or tax on them. On average, the tariff is about 3 percent of imported goods to America. Sales taxes can occur in the federal and state level. A sales tax is a tax on goods and services (when the consumer buys a product). For example, if I buy a ring or foods, a sales tax is added on the total amount of the cost of the stuff that I brought. Most local government has a real estate or property tax. A property tax is a tax on human property like a home or a business. Property taxes generated $436 million in 2011 in revenue. Differences among property taxes vary from state to state. The proportional tax plan or a flat tax means that everyone (regardless of income level) pays the same percentage of taxes. For example, regardless if a person’s income is 1 million dollars yearly or 40,000 yearly, they pay the same 15% tax rate nationally.

The more truth comes out about the Trayvon Martin murder, the more truth is coming on our side. Our side wants justice not tokenism. Our side wants tolerance not stereotyping your fellow man. For a time, the reactionaries from FOX News and other locations slandered the victim. Today, their lies caught up with them when new evidence pants a more accurate picture about the whole Trayvon Martin tragedy. Investigator Chris Serino said that Zimmerman didn’t use self defense. He wanted George Zimmerman to be charged with manslaughter, but the Florida state attorney’s office shot that idea down (since they felt that there was insufficient evidence to charge Zimmerman. This is silly since probable cause is merited in an arrest). Zimmerman’s father is a judge too. It’s 2012 and people can still be murdered if they wear a hoodie in a gated community. The Sanford police supported Zimmerman from the beginning and treated Trayvon as the criminal when he was not. Zimmerman weighs 250 pounds and Trayvon Martin weighed 140 pounds. He is skinny than me when I was 17 years old (and I was skinny back then). Many witnesses say that they heard a young man cry out for help before a shot was fired. After the shot was fired, the cries for help immediately ended. The police didn’t check Zimmerman’s criminal record or drug/alcohol content, but only Trayvon Martin’s. Zimmerman is found to have assaulted a police officer and he assaulted a woman. He’s a punk and a criminal. The police didn’t even talk to Trayvon Martin’s girlfriend, who had been on the phone with him before and during part of the attack. Police video proves that there are no signs of blood or bruises on Zimmerman. Zimmerman didn’t went into the hospital too. Captain Robert O’Donnor made the decision to release George Zimmerman. Yet, it’s important for us to not financially exploit this tragedy. We should fight for truth and fight for justice without a financial angle at all. Also, we should recognize the epidemic of police brutality, racial profiling, and other evils in the world today. The police still haven’t talked to Trayvon Martin’s girlfriend. In fact, the Sanford police have a history of protecting those who brutalize and murder black people. In 2005, two security guards, one the son of a Sanford police officer and the other a department volunteer, killed a Black man they claimed was trying to run them over. The guards were eventually acquitted. And the officer in charge of that case was the same one in charge at the scene of the Trayvon Martin murder. In 2010, police waited seven weeks to arrest a lieutenant’s son who was caught on video punching a homeless Black man. This is why even the celebrities are speaking out, because this Trayvon Martin unjust murder is so blatantly unjustified. The wars on drugs and mass incarceration policies have harmed America. It’s not the youth’s fault for these evils. It’s the fault of the oppressor alone. This oppression against people of color and all people should be fault against by the people.

Hunger Games is an unique, controversial movie. Some people wanted to rate the movie R because of its violence. Yet, the move was classified as PG-13. The movie talks about the place of Panem, which is the authoritarian high tech dictatorship described in the film. The film outlines the police state fictionally, which is similar to the so-called “benevolent” police state that we experience daily in America. It’s interesting The Hunger Games author Suzanne Collins gave her dystopian nation an appropriate name – Panem, from the Latin phrase “Panem et Circenses” which means “Bread and Circuses.” It was the basic Roman recipe for the required amusement and distraction of the masses existing within a military dictatorship. People already realize that we have huge civil liberty violations in America that negatively affect human beings. This film shows a collapsed society and a dictatorship running 12 regions in the world. There is feudalism and people killed who dare to eat. Men in the film are emasculated, so masculinity is based on the film. Femininity is based in the film as well. This film is similar to predictive programming or the plans of the elite shown in a fictional film. The film describes Agenda 21 like system. The 12 world regions are controlled by a centralized system. Agriculture is very limited in the film. The government has the high tech system that controls the masses. Agenda 21, the Biodiversity Treaty, etc. is about the violation of national sovereignty and the depopulation of the population of humanity. The elite control most of the land. The film shows sacrifices and also the showing of splitting the family up. A militarized society has occurred in nations worldwide. In the USA today, we have more militarized police, more tyranny since 9/11, and more innocent people being murdered under suspicious circumstances via the police. The reality is that life is worth living. We can see the moon, trees, animals, and humanity to see the beauty of God’s creations. Information is electrifying. Even some scientists have reversed aging in mice. There is still Big Brother in the world. The world is active and so many occurrences have been occurring. There has been a lot of hype surrounding the Hunger Games. The film describes t eugenics agenda. The film shows gladiatorial games and human sacrifice (which is supported in Biodiversity Treaty). The film talks about the time period of 47 years after the rebellion. There were genetically modified wasps. The film talks about sacrificing children and people cheer for their sons to die. There are nanotech creatures that are commonly shown in the Hunger Games movie. The film shows the last of resistance that wants to battle against the globalized system. The world in the movie is divided among groups and classes plus styles. The people in the film are very hungry and they live off a squirrel meat. Hunger Games shows reality. In real life, the elite promote rationing of foods, while they store grains secretly in the Arctic Circle (while restricting it from the poorer people in the world).

The Supreme Court is questioning the new heath care law, especially its component of the individual mandate (that forces people to have private health insurance). Populists have said that singer payer system is better than the current law. The current law has some legitimate parts in it though. The Republicans are very hypocritical to claim to oppose the mandate when the individual mandate was supported by Republicans since that late 1980’s (even before Mitt Romney’s Romney care in Massachusetts). Back in the late 1980’s, conservative economists like Mark Pauly wanted a mandate. He was a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of business. Pauly wanted a mandate to make an alternative to government sponsored universal health coverage. The Heritage Foundation with its people like Stuart Butler advanced the mandate as well. The Heritage Foundation worked with Mitt Romney to pass his 2006 health reform law (that forces citizens in his state to purchase insurance coverage). Some Democrats oppose this Republican idea, because it can be used as a gateway for the insurance industry to dominate health care services. Even Bill Clinton opposed it. President Barack Obama once opposed the mandate during the 2008 Presidential campaign. It’s very strange to support a mandate that forces people to buy into the same private insurance companies that is harming us. It’s better to promote a single payer, Medicare for all type of system. The private health care insurance industry supports both parties, but even the vast majority of Americans (as proven by polls supported single payer health care).

We should oppose the onslaught on American workers. We have the evil war on terrorism, the corporate crimes of the elite, the bailout of banks, and tax cuts for the super wealthy rich. We have jingoistic patriotism in America. We live in a country where the police and intelligence agencies monitor what you read and can arrest you on suspicion of subversive activity. Being a good citizen is not about submitting to the evil whims of the corrupt state. It’s about being knowledgeable of the world, strong for fight tyranny, and never giving up in your life. That’s honorable and true. We know that the war allows the Pentagon to militarily dominate Latin American nations. When the Drug war is strenghten, the privatized prison system has increased its powers as well. In fact, over 40 percent of the people in prison in America (made up of 2.3 million people) has been Congress passed legislation giving the same severe jail time for the milder cannabis as for the sale or possession of cocaine and heroin. This remains the foundation of current drug law. Even in some states, if you are convicted of non-violent possession of marijuana, you can get life in prison. Yes, life in prison, so this stuff is wrong blatantly. Tough on crime rhetoric doesn't solve the problem of crime conclusively, but it does increase the power of the prison industrial complex.

As I posted before Mr. Oliver own personal feelings about Black men helped feed into the racist, warped, hateful mind of George Zimmerman and contributed to mindset that led Zimmerman to murder Trayvon Martin in cold blood. Unfortunately Mr Oliver is not alone with his self hatred of Black folks, many other Black people harbor the same beliefs, those beliefs come from our history of Slavery and was passed down to him for generations. Instead of hating Mr Oliver I feel sorry for him, he has made himself a global embarrassment and he will fare worse than the racist murderer he's so willing to defend.

this is a good development because it completely discredits oliver. oliver is only useful to zimmerman's cause if he comes off as a reasonable, moderate black person who supports zimmerman. but by exposing himself as some caricature stepinfetchit who even defends blatantly derogatory racial slurs, oliver has undermined zimmerman's effort to convey himself as non-racist, since apparently to be a "black friend" of zimmerman you have to be a tom like oliver.

It appears that "racism" is not the only thing "alive and well"...
***********************************************************
It appears that "house negroism"...is also "alive and well"...
********************************************************

I won't even call this man retarded because that would be offensive to people who actually are mentally handicapped. A mentally handicapped person wouldn't even do that. They'd look at you like my mind isn't that messed up. Even Jerry Seinfeld wouldn't even back up Michael Richards during his racially charged rant on black people. Seinfeld wasn't stepping in those waters and he was smart not to. This guy here has to be a paid uncle Tom.

Followers

About Me

I'm a young adult learning new information and finding the truth. Over the years, I'm becoming more meek. I will still defend my beliefs though when it is necessary. I am 33 years old now. I like living in Hampton Roads. Hampton Roads is apart of Southeastern Virginia and Northeastern North Carolina. I live in the 7 city group of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, Newport News, Hampton, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach. Yorktown, Williamsburg, Glocuster, Cape Charles, Elizabeth City, Currituck, Sussex, and Poquoson are apart of Hampton Roads as well. So, I don't forget those important places as well. I enjoy looking at religious information, conspiracy fact information, and politics. Additionally, History is a subject that I delve into. If you have any comments and questions, you can email me at truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com. I'm usually very apt to respond to emails easily. This is a non-censorship blog so your comments will never be censored here.