what they also said was they were not willing to put their names in a statement saying what was done is true.
no one wanted to put their name on paper because they didn’t want their name tied to saying - yes this guy can reveal mistakes and errors in one of the worlds most holy book.

Dude, people have been doing that for hundreds of years now. It is what led to the Documentary Hypothesis, it is part of what led to the fundamentalism backlash that we experience today. I find it hard to believe that you could have traveled this much, talked to this many people and not come across someone else who has told you this. Also, there are many theologians doing the same thing to some degree or another. You are starting to sound like someone who is trying to invent a conspiracy where there isn’t one.

and sir you are talking without reviewing the zip file i posted.
my work is different from all others. my work is based on finding hidden formats. the mistakes speak for them self.

so there is no study or book like the zip file i posted for revelations

I don’t need to read anything more to know that people have been “finding errors in the Bible” for hundreds of years. The first famous one was a Jewish guy, then there were Protestants, theologians all. More recently it has been people who might have started out theistic, but were disillusioned when they really started studying the Bible. This is not controversial history. It may not be well known, but it is known in seminary, it is known in scholarly halls, and it is known if you do a little research yourself.

That’s “evidenced based reasoning”. You’re asking me to review your work and compare it to all the other work done in this field and rate its ease of reading and what it shows. How could I evaluate if you “show all the errors” if I don’t first know what the set of “all errors” consists of?

I don’t need to read anything more to know that people have been “finding errors in the Bible” for hundreds of years. The first famous one was a Jewish guy, then there were Protestants, theologians all. More recently it has been people who might have started out theistic, but were disillusioned when they really started studying the Bible. This is not controversial history. It may not be well known, but it is known in seminary, it is known in scholarly halls, and it is known if you do a little research yourself.

That’s “evidenced based reasoning”. You’re asking me to review your work and compare it to all the other work done in this field and rate its ease of reading and what it shows. How could I evaluate if you “show all the errors” if I don’t first know what the set of “all errors” consists of?

why would you need to compare my work to all other work?
you might find my work is ‘self evident’. it’s not really debatable when the text speaks for itself.

why would you need to compare my work to all other work?
you might find my work is ‘self evident’. it’s not really debatable when the text speaks for itself.

Because you make comparative claims. I already agree with your general claim, that the Bible has “mistakes”, so what is different about your claims? How do they further the work of those who have already made similar claims?

why would you need to compare my work to all other work?
you might find my work is ‘self evident’. it’s not really debatable when the text speaks for itself.

Because you make comparative claims. I already agree with your general claim, that the Bible has “mistakes”, so what is different about your claims? How do they further the work of those who have already made similar claim?

errors and mistakes!

>How do they further the work of those who have already made similar claim?

by finding the hidden formats, they explain themselves as to errors, lost endings, words left out, added texts sticks out. it corrects the starting of new chapters. it also shows where new chapters should start. it makes the text the easiest biblical text to read. with the formats changing it shows that there is a different writer adding his words. it shows how the books were pieced together.
my work will also help prove or disprove what others have said they have found as errors or writers.

ex. if you read either of the books in the zip files. you can see and “read/taste” the different writers. thus there is no argument as to how many writers there were. a whole lot of thing become self evident proof.
it is better to print them out. so you can read them without having to scroll as you read.

you might want to call it “evidence-based reasoning”.

most of the time people are looking for a sign from GOD or a sign from a male saying GOD MADE me see HIM.
here i am. the message/sign from me. is reading the hidden formats reveal i’ve changed biblical history as you know it.
that’s right, all biblical history as it is know today.

Fella, if you don’t know about Friedman, Quelle, probably Bart Ehrman, and others, then please just stop. You’re not qualified to write on the subject.

Folks - Like that other guy who posted images of some crazy theory, I think this guy is just baiting the forum on to get click-thrus to the links he’s included. Then he can get $ for the clicks. Don’t fall for it.

Fella, if you don’t know about Friedman, Quelle, probably Bart Ehrman, and others, then please just stop. You’re not qualified to write on the subject.

Folks - Like that other guy who posted images of some crazy theory, I think this guy is just baiting the forum on to get click-thrus to the links he’s included. Then he can get $ for the clicks. Don’t fall for it.

you come along and post something that just doesn’t make since.

what does >Friedman, Quelle, probably Bart Ehrman, and others,
have to do proving there is hidden formats thought the bible?

did you read over my work? - if not, how do you know what i’m even posting about to make a comment like that?

that said let me go to this statement >You’re not qualified to write on the subject.
i didn’t write nothing, i used word for word in order to show the hidden formats. to say i’m not qualified to write is just laughable. i copied word for word in order.

then to say i want you to click on the links i posted. that’s laughable too. like there are hundreds of people here clicking away.

instead of just posting to post ‘something’. try to pay attention to the words i’m saying and the proof i’m posting.

Actually, it does. The sources and the names he points to are sources and names which anybody who is genuinely well versed in academic/technical Biblical scholarship should know. YOU obviously do not know about any of this and even worse, don’t even seem to care. You’ve taken your own “work” for authoritative and it’s nothing of the kind.

This much renders you unworthwhile to listen to or even engage anymore.

Am I being harsh?

You’re damned right I am. When I see some evidence that you’ve done your homework and actually know what you’re talking about, I might consider engaging you. Since it’s going to be months if not years before you achieve that much, I think I’m pretty much done here.

And so are you.

Signature

Question authority and think for yourself. Big Brother does not know best and never has.

Fella, if you don’t know about Friedman, Quelle, probably Bart Ehrman, and others, then please just stop. You’re not qualified to write on the subject.

Folks - Like that other guy who posted images of some crazy theory, I think this guy is just baiting the forum on to get click-thrus to the links he’s included. Then he can get $ for the clicks. Don’t fall for it.

you come along and post something that just doesn’t make since.

what does >Friedman, Quelle, probably Bart Ehrman, and others,
have to do proving there is hidden formats thought the bible?

did you read over my work? - if not, how do you know what i’m even posting about to make a comment like that?

that said let me go to this statement >You’re not qualified to write on the subject.
i didn’t write nothing, i used word for word in order to show the hidden formats. to say i’m not qualified to write is just laughable. i copied word for word in order.

then to say i want you to click on the links i posted. that’s laughable too. like there are hundreds of people here clicking away.

instead of just posting to post ‘something’. try to pay attention to the words i’m saying and the proof i’m posting.

so far this site seems to have only a peanut gallery.

Yes I did read a little of your post. For starters, your English is horrible. That’s not a crime by any means, but if you’re going to be doing textual analyses of any kind, you’d better be an expert in the language of your subject. BUT…the real language of your subject isn’t English, so you’re doubly off base. Biblical scholars know Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, etc. so that they can get to the source of their analysis. Short of that you’re just playing word games, nothing more.

That said, if you’re not just posting to attract click thrus, then maybe you are serious about Biblical Textual analysis. If so, stop these silly posts, do your research, then try to contribute in a small and humble way in the appropriate forum.

This much renders you unworthwhile to listen to or even engage anymore.

Am I being harsh?

You’re damned right I am. When I see some evidence that you’ve done your homework and actually know what you’re talking about, I might consider engaging you. Since it’s going to be months if not years before you achieve that much, I think I’m pretty much done here.

And so are you.

........................

here you go

GOD MADE ME see HIM,
i’m i being to harsh to you.

i’m s pea king to you,
freaking to all others.

lets play the game,
who knows more.

o mankind,
i explained the bi-ble.

taken the mistakes out,
showing the errors within.

now your thinking,
that can’t be.

you wanted prove of my education,
go look at the drug isle in the stores.

look for the x,
its in the 1st or 2nd font size.

then come here,
i am waiting.

what knots,
who’s not.

i’m a little boy,
who did come from the woods.

teachers did not whisper in my ear,
professors lacked the knowledge when i walked before them.

Yes I did read a little of your post. For starters, your English is horrible. That’s not a crime by any means, but if you’re going to be doing textual analyses of any kind, you’d better be an expert in the language of your subject. BUT…the real language of your subject isn’t English, so you’re doubly off base. Biblical scholars know Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, etc. so that they can get to the source of their analysis. Short of that you’re just playing word games, nothing more.

That said, if you’re not just posting to attract click thrus, then maybe you are serious about Biblical Textual analysis. If so, stop these silly posts, do your research, then try to contribute in a small and humble way in the appropriate forum.

i was told by those in the know,
i am the highest writer of the english language.

they told me that,
after i showed them.

for i know why each letter is,
just symbols invented by mankind.

the long lost art of knowing this,
gave me a way in to explain to people like U.

HEBREW WRITE IN ALL CAPITALS,
PROBOYS PROGIRLS.

the little letters,
well lets see.

the p,
falls below the line.

the f,
lacks stiffness.

yet some one told you not to write in capital words,
THEY SAID THAT IS YELLING.

but i said,
ITS NOT SO.

SO IF YOU NOW CAN READ HEBREW,
you can now read hebrew 2.

i’m the greatest grand master of chan-zen,
i write with a mud brick pen.

penning an opening,
s pea king to U.

tea c hers,
pro fess o r s.

this virgin has been writing very high,
higher then U have been reading.