The Babe Theory of Political Movements

A couple years ago, after witnessing yet another National Organization for Women announcement at my school, I noted to a friend, "You know, if the people involved in feminist clubs were attractive, I think more people would listen up. Unfortunately, most of the ‘proactively feminist’ are unattractive."

P.J. O’Rourke, who I find hilarious, coined "the babe theory of political movements" some time ago:

"Best of all, there were hardly any beautiful women at the [Housing Now!] rally. I saw a journalist friend of mine in the Mall, and he and I pursued this line of inquiry as assiduously as our happy private lives allow. Practically every female at the march was a bowser. "We’re not being sexist here," my friend insisted. "It’s not that looks matter per se. It’s just that beautiful women are always on the cutting edge of social trends. Remember how many beautiful women were in the anti-war movement twenty years ago? In the yoga classes fifteen years ago? At the discos ten years ago? On Wall Street five years ago? Where the beautiful women are is where the country is headed," said my friend. "And this," he looked around him, "isn’t it."

I actually think you’re on to something if you mean to say that causes do better when they have attractive spokespeople. The offensive part of your post, though, was the baseless assertion that feminists are unattractive. You (I hope unwittingly) invoked the outdated and idiotic cliche that girls only become feminists because they can’t find a date.

Reply link does not work in your browser because JavaScript is disabled.Reply