Wednesday, February 24, 2016

“Lady Murderface”, Yelp, and the National Labor Relations Act

By now, you’ve likely heard about the employee fired by Yelp for her very public blog post directed at her former employer’s CEO, criticizing her $24,000 annual salary. Here’s a particular biting excerpt:

I wonder what it would be like if I made $24,000 more annually. I could probably get the headlight fixed on my car. And the flat tire. And maybe even get the oil change and renewed registration — but I don’t want to dream too extravagantly. Maybe you could cut out all the coconut waters altogether? You could probably cut back on a lot of the drinks and snacks that are stocked on every single floor. I mean, I could handle losing out on pistachio nuts if I was getting paid enough to afford groceries. No one really eats the pistachios anyway — have you ever tried answering the phone fifty times an hour while eating pistachios? Those hard shells really get in the way of talking to hundreds of customers and restaurants a day.

Within two hours of the post going live, Yelp fired her (which she tweeted).

i love to get fired because i said out loud that i can’t afford to pay my rent, this has solved all of my problems!

At his HR Capitalist blog, Kris Dunn commented, “You’re tone deaf if you’re calling out your company online with your name attached.” But, it’s not that black and white, because the National Labor Relations Act protects employees who engage in protected concerted activity.

So, here’s the $64,000 question: does Lady Murderface have a claim against Yelp?

The Yelp firing illustrates the difficulties that arise when the NLRB’s protected-concerted-activity protections intersect with social media. Back in the day (oh, five years ago), we knew what concerted activity looked like. It was groups of employees standing around a water cooler, or sitting around a break-room table, or huddling in a quiet corner, complaining to each other about this or that. Social media, however, has not only removed the complaints from the physical work space, it also permits employees to complain to no one, or, maybe more accurately, to everyone.

We need to keep in mind that half of term “social media” is social. One does not take to Facebook, or Twitter, or a blog, to have a conversation with oneself. Social conversation is not masturbatory, it’s participatory. It’s entire focus is to initiate or induce a share, like, retweet, or comment from others. By its very definition and nature, everything on social media is concerted.

Thus, it’s safe to assume that part of Lady Murderface’s intent in writing the post was to engage with some of her co-workers at Yelp. She wrote:

So here I am, 25-years old, balancing all sorts of debt and trying to pave a life for myself that doesn’t involve crying in the bathtub every week. Every single one of my coworkers is struggling. They’re taking side jobs, they’re living at home. One of them started a GoFundMe because she couldn’t pay her rent. She ended up leaving the company and moving east, somewhere the minimum wage could double as a living wage. Another wrote on those neat whiteboards we’ve got on every floor begging for help because he was bound to be homeless in two weeks.

If her intent was to engage her co-workers to initiate or induce group action, then the NLRA protects her, at least as the NLRB currently interprets the law. Maybe, however, the law needs to be rewritten to account for the ubiquitous power of social media. Until it is, however, employers need to treat very carefully before firing anyone for something written about work online.

Disclaimer

This blog is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Further, your use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Online readers should not act upon any information presented on this blog without seeking professional legal counsel. The legal information provided in this blog is general and should not be relied on as legal advice, which I cannot provide without full consideration of all relevant information relating to one's individual situation.

The author apologizes for any factual or other errors in this blog. If you believe that some content is inaccurate, false, disparaging, slanderous, libelous, or defamatory, please post a comment or contact me; I will consider editing existing content, removing that content, or posting a retraction. Information herein is provided on an "as is" or "as available" basis; we make no warranty of any kind to you regarding the information provided and disclaim any liability for damages from use of the blog or its content.