H ISTORY 348 F INAL E XAM S TUDY G UIDE E XAM DATE AND T IME : T UESDAY , A PRIL 28, 10:30-12:30 P LACE : R EGULAR LECTURE CLASSROOM ***Please remember to bring blue books to the final! (You will probably need 2, since there are 2 essays). The final exam is made up of two parts, as follows: I. Identification terms (5) : 30-40 minutes; 30% of grade (6% each). Seven ID terms (drawn from the lists found at the bottom of your lecture outlines) will appear on your exam. You will be asked to identify and indicate the significance of five of these ID terms. Note : The ID’s will not be cumulative; you will only be tested on terms from Unit III. As in previous exams, make sure to explain not just what the terms refer to, but also identify time, place, people involved, and most importantly, their broader significance and effects in the specific country and, if applicable, in Latin America in general. You should be able to do this fairly briefly, in 4 or 5 sentences. (Please refer to the Unit 1 study sheet for an example). IDs: 3/25 Alliance for Progress; National Security Doctrine; “politics of anti-politics”; disappearance; Salvador Allende; Augusto Pinochet. 3/30 “New Left”; Montoneros; 1

This preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.

“The Hour of the Furnaces”; Ezeiza Massacre; Tropicalists. 4/1 1 word 4/6 Ladino; liberation theology; Efraín Ríos Mott. 4/8 Structural adjustment; “lost decade”; EZLN (“Zapatistas”) 4/13 –movie, 4/15-guest speaker Alliance for Progress: Refers to one of the interventionist tactics of the US during the 1960s. The US gave aid to LA neocolonial military dictatorships in order to defend capitalism in the area and defend against communism. It was sparked by fear after Cuban Rev. The AforP is one example of intervention where JFK gave development aid to political groups in LA that were centrist (b/c centrist over leftist were willing to make concessions to prevent revolution). Wanted to reduce revolutionary pressure by stimulating econ development and political reform. This is based on the Bolivian model where US supported MNR through funding and brought it from left to center. Failed in Chile when Allenede won in 1970 because open intervention by US was not secretive…US supported Fiei and he was seen as their “doup” Failed by 1970s because harder to change entire society than just give guns. National Security Doctrine

This is the end of the preview. Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.