The nature of information science: changing models

ArticleEnglishOPEN

Robinson, L.
;
Karamuftuoglu, M.
(2010)

Publisher: UNIV SHEFFIELD DEPT INFORMATION STUDIES

Subject: Z665

Introduction. This paper considers the nature of information science as a discipline and profession.\ud \ud Method. It is based on conceptual analysis of the information science literature, and consideration of philosophical perspectives, particularly those of Kuhn and Peirce.\ud \ud Results. It is argued that information science may be understood as a field of study, with human recorded information as its concern, focusing on the components of the information chain, studied through the perspective of domain analysis, in specific or general contexts. A particular aspect of interest is those aspects of information organization, and of human information-related behaviour, which are invariant to changes in technology. Information science can also be seen as a science of evaluation of information, understood as semantic content with respect to qualitative growth of knowledge and change in knowledge structures in domains.\ud \ud Conclusions. This study contributes to the understanding of the unique 'academic territory' of information science, a discipline with an identity distinct from adjoining subjects.

Karamuftuoglu, M., (2006), Information arts and information science: time to unite? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(13), 1780-1793 Kari, J. (2010), Diversity in the conceptions of information use, Information Research, in press Kuhn, T.S., (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.