If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

why the facepalm? if you can get a franchise right fielder, then i'd be more than okay with Joey B at 3rd and Lawrie at 2nd. I may be the only one, but I definately think Lawrie would be a better fielder at second base.

why the facepalm? if you can get a franchise right fielder, then i'd be more than okay with this move. I may be the only one, but I definately think Lawrie would be a better fielder at second base.

Why the facepalm?

Lawrie is not just succeeding at third-base, he's excelling there.

Bautista is a below-average fielder at third, so why would you move an excelling third-baseman to second-base, only to replace him with someone who, defensively, has not succeeded there? I would much rather just keep Lawrie at third, and move Bautista to first if, by some miracle, the Jays were to acquire Stanton.

Bautista is a below-average fielder at third, so why would you move an excelling third-baseman to second-base, only to replace him with someone who, defensively, has not succeeded there? I would much rather just keep Lawrie at third, and move Bautista to first if, by some miracle, the Jays were to acquire Stanton.

Alright fair enough. All great points.

Im more than happy to have Lawrie at 3B but I still do believe though that he could also be an elite second baseman.

why the facepalm? if you can get a franchise right fielder, then i'd be more than okay with Joey B at 3rd and Lawrie at 2nd. I may be the only one, but I definately think Lawrie would be a better fielder at second base.

Lawrie at second base is not happening....people need to stop with this idea that Lawrie at second base is plausible and even Bautista at 3B as plausible. Please everyone stop it!