While the idea itself is not original, it execution was alright and would work nicely with other ideas that you might come up with. As a suggestion, you might want to check the "Formatting" tab in the "How to write an SCP" guide hub to do a propped addendum (A huge article does not necessarily attract more attention)

The issue with basically writing up werewolf lore is that they're so popular in media that it's really hard to find a unique enough approach that will hold an audience's interest.

Personally, I recommend getting the base idea polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you try fixing the draft. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone asks), and reviewers there can help you

Thanks for the suggestions. However, I do think my draft is sufficiently distinguishable from the examples discussed in the links you provided. I really haven't seen anything too similar to my draft on the site, specifically in the execution of the concept.

I would also like to add that trying to be too unique can often result in the opposite. I think doing a better version of something that people already understand is just as viable an option as any other. We don't always have to reinvent the wheel.

However, I do think my draft is sufficiently distinguishable from the examples discussed in the links you provided

I provided the examples to indicate how popular the idea is; furthermore, there are many other attempts that I didn't mention that are buried in months' worth of deletion records.

I really haven't seen anything too similar to my draft on the site, specifically in the execution of the concept.

Typically such articles are deleted after falling too low in ratings.

I would also like to add that trying to be too unique can often result in the opposite.

Sure, but this argument might not really hold as much weight with something as overdone as werewolves.

This is something better discussed in the ideas stage, at any rate.

I think doing a better version of something that people already understand is just as viable an option as any other.

It's not an issue of if people understand the concept or not, it's whether they've seen it already. If a reader is going through a mainsite piece, sees it's about werewolves, and notices that the first bits are pretty predictable given the classic and media portrayals of werewolves, they're probably going to downvote and then read something else rather than finishing the read.

After skimming through the draft, i'm going to give my (unofficial) second opinion that this just isn't going to work out. Even if it isn't identical to the other drafts, the base concept is just a werewolf, which most likely isn't going to succeed as an article. And while a better version of something people already understand can work in some cases, I don't feel this is one of those cases. There comes a point where a trope is so overdone that it becomes very, very difficult to pull of correctly, even as a very experienced author.1

You're the author and you can do what you want, but I agree with Zyn that moving forward with this draft is an all around bad idea.

Edit: Ninja'd

Footnotes

1. Not to mention that we as a community tend to be harsher than others when it comes to content.