Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Iraq Proposes Changing Its Provincial Borders

In July 2013, Iraq’s parliament passed along a draft law to
redraw the country’s provincial boundaries. The bill was proposed by President
Jalal Talabani back at the beginning of 2012 to reverse all the internal
changes made by Saddam Hussein. If passed it would dramatically change the
internal contours of the country. Unfortunately, Iraq’s legislature is not
known for its expertise. Many lawmakers are probably unaware of what the law
would do to Iraq. It would mean many elected politicians would lose their jobs
or get lower positions within existing governments. One thing the Iraqi elite
is most protective of is their privileges. That means that while the bill is
going through the motions there’s little likelihood that it will ever be
passed.

In early 2012, Iraq’s President Jalal Talabani submitted a
bill to modify Iraq’s internal borders. (1) The draft was based upon
re-doing all of the boundaries changed by Saddam. It took until July 2013 for it to move out of committee. At the beginning of that month, Kurdish
President Massoud Barzani visited Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in Baghdad.
The two made a number of promises to each other including cooperating on the
border law. Like any major piece of legislation this one has its supporters and
detractors. The Kurdish parties obviously support the bill claiming that it is
part of Article 140 of the constitution, which is meant to reverse the
Arabization policies of the former regime. A State of Law member said he was
for the draft as well. Two parliamentarians from the Iraqi National Movement
however came out against it saying that it would be wrong to go back in time
several decades, while the other believed that the law would simply increase
Iraq’s difficulties. Finally, a legal expert stated that the bill was not
covered by the constitution, and that it would only cause conflicts between the
parties and provinces. It sounded like the legislators were only talking about
the idea of changing the boundaries of the country’s governorates. If they knew
exactly how much would be altered the majority would probably reject it
outright.

Iraq’s provincial boundaries in 1970 when the Baath were
already in power, but Saddam was not the head of state (Dr. Michael Izady)

Iraq’s provincial boundaries in 1990 during the Gulf War (Dr. Michael Izady)

Iraq’s provincial boundaries today. Note that Baghdad is
much smaller than it actually is on the majority of modern Iraq maps. (Wikipedia)

Iraq’s provinces pre-Saddam look little like the current ones.
In 1970 before Saddam became the head of state there were 19 provinces not the
current 18. Not only that, but Dohuk did not exist, it was part of Mosul, present day Ninewa. Anbar was Dulaim and cut in half by the Northern Desert. Muthanna was Samawa and only consisted of the area around that city. The
southern part of Basra, the Zubayr district that borders Kuwait was part of the
Southern Desert. Dhi Qar was known as Mutafiq and the southern portion belonged
to Basra. The northern section of Muthanna, the Samawa, Rumaitha and Khidhir
districts were part of what was then known as Samawa governorate. Najaf was
much smaller, only consisting of the area around the city of Najaf. Babil was
Hillah, and it and Karbala were larger extending into present day Anbar. Diyala
on the other hand, was smaller with Kirkuk province cutting into its northern
region. Salahaddin was Samarra, but smaller. Mosul governorate consisted of
present day Ninewa and Dohuk, and part of northern Salahaddin. The two southern
districts of Sulaymaniya, Chamchamal and Kala belonged to Kirkuk. That province
was much larger extending into Salahaddin, Diyala, and Sulaymaniya. The only
governorates that were roughly the same as today were Irbil, Qadisiyah, which
was Diwaniya then, Maysan that went by Amarah, Wasit, which was known as Kut,
and Baghdad. By 1990, Iraq had 18 provinces, and their current names, but the
borders were still a little different. It is not known which map the bill is
based upon, but if it really intends to reverse all the changes made by Saddam
it would mean the elimination of several governorates, and the redrawing of
many of the others. Not only that, but the provincial council of Dohuk would
disappear, while those in Anbar, Basra, Muthanna, Salahaddin, Diyala, and
Karbala would face possible cuts, and Najaf’s, Tamim’s, and Ninewa’s could be
expanded. Elections would also have to be held in the new provinces of Northern
and Southern Desert. The Kurdish Coalition claimed that it supported the draft,
but it would mean that the Kurdistan Regional Government would lose a third of
its territory, while Sunni and Shiite areas would add one province each. That
would cause political and administrative chaos.

The idea of reversing Saddam’s border changes may seem like
a good idea in theory, but in practice it would only add more problems to a
troubled country. It’s doubtful that many parliamentarians have even looked at
a map to see the transformation that would happen if the draft bill were
passed. None of the ruling parties would want to give up seats in the existing
provincial councils, and the Kurds would never agree to losing Dohuk although
they would probably rule the expanded Ninewa. Iraq’s parties are not about to
see any diminution of their powers. Once the details of the law become known
there will be few who will support it. Like many major pieces of legislation,
this one will simply sit in parliament to die a slow death.

IRAQ HISTORY TIMELINE

TWITTER

About Me

Musings On Iraq was started in 2008 to explain the political, economic, security and cultural situation in Iraq via original articles and interviews. If you wish to contact me personally my email is: motown67@aol.com