Issac Ortega, president of Associated Student of the University of Arizona, says students don't relish the idea of having to spend more on a college education after deep state funding cuts to universities.

"But we do understand that we have to ensure some quality," he told the Board of Regents via videoconferencing at a meeting Monday night.

"I think the message from our students to the senior leadership is very, very clear: It's not our student's fault, it's not our administration's fault, and it's certainly not the fault of our wonderful regents," Ortega said.

Student after student took to the podiums set up on eight campuses around the state, connected through a live broadcast across the multiple locations, to tell the regents they understand the need for proposed tuition increases - even thanking the regents.

All three public universities have proposed increases to help offset a $99 million cut in state funding for the fiscal year beginning July 1. Regents are scheduled to vote on the plans in June.

ASU, for example, wants to have resident undergraduate students pay an additional $321, presented as a one-time surcharge, while nonresident undergraduate students would pay an additional $955.

Students in some programs, like Barrett, the Honors College, and new students entering the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication, would have to pay an additional fee.

Daniel Martin,19, a Barrett student and Undergraduate Student Government senator, told the regents he understands the proposed $250-per-semester program fee for those in the honors program.

"While I by no means celebrate the fee increase for Barrett, the Honors College, I along with many of my colleagues understand that it is necessary," said Martin, a physics major. "Furthermore, I want to commend Barrett, the Honors College, for their willingness to work with students, to dictate where the fee increase will go along with the transparency they've approached this issue."

Mark Killian, the board's chairman, said the students understand that elected state leaders, not the Board of Regents, caused the problem. He said involving students in developing the proposals was critical.

"If we're going to be successful in higher education today, we have to have the students involved in what we're doing," he said.