LE

She is eligible to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship. Revoking her citizenship on these grounds is at least controversial and possibly illegal. It's right that she's able to challenge a government decison like that in court.

Personally I think it's a godawful decision by David because it sets a precedent for a Corbyn government to be able to remove citizenship from any Jewish citizen they see fit, given that all would be eligible for Israeli citizenship. That's a political issue though. She should get legal aid on the grounds that the government needs to comply with the law and should be open to challenge in the courts.

LE

She is eligible to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship. Revoking her citizenship on these grounds is at least controversial and possibly illegal. It's right that she's able to challenge a government decison like that in court.

Personally I think it's a godawful decision by David because it sets a precedent for a Corbyn government to be able to remove citizenship from any Jewish citizen they see fit, given that all would be eligible for Israeli citizenship. That's a political issue though. She should get legal aid on the grounds that the government needs to comply with the law and should be open to challenge in the courts.

LE

She is eligible to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship. Revoking her citizenship on these grounds is at least controversial and possibly illegal. It's right that she's able to challenge a government decison like that in court.

Personally I think it's a godawful decision by David because it sets a precedent for a Corbyn government to be able to remove citizenship from any Jewish citizen they see fit, given that all would be eligible for Israeli citizenship. That's a political issue though. She should get legal aid on the grounds that the government needs to comply with the law and should be open to challenge in the courts.

LE

There’s lots of smoke and mirrors. Where people have stated that you can’t make someone stateless under international law is incorrect, it’s not binding, it’s to be aspired to and I think, occasionally there are exceptions.

You may not believe in God or a God, but trust me, when you’re really in the shit you will pray to everyone.

LE

Personally I think it's a godawful decision by David because it sets a precedent for a Corbyn government to be able to remove citizenship from any Jewish citizen they see fit, given that all would be eligible for Israeli citizenship. That's a political issue though. She should get legal aid on the grounds that the government needs to comply with the law and should be open to challenge in the courts.

LE

Personally I think it's a godawful decision by David because it sets a precedent for a Corbyn government to be able to remove citizenship from any Jewish citizen they see fit, given that all would be eligible for Israeli citizenship.

No international law is binding. However, if you want other states to obey the rules then you generally need to obey them yourself. Other states may also stop engaging with you positively if you breach international law.

LE

No international law is binding. However, if you want other states to obey the rules then you generally need to obey them yourself. Other states may also stop engaging with you positively if you breach international law.

I appreciate that, but there are exceptions to every rule and as every state’s first consideration should be the protection of itself and its citizens, I can’t see many others having too much problem with it.

You may not believe in God or a God, but trust me, when you’re really in the shit you will pray to everyone.

LE

MIA

She is eligible to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship. Revoking her citizenship on these grounds is at least controversial and possibly illegal. It's right that she's able to challenge a government decison like that in court.

Personally I think it's a godawful decision by David because it sets a precedent for a Corbyn government to be able to remove citizenship from any Jewish citizen they see fit, given that all would be eligible for Israeli citizenship. That's a political issue though. She should get legal aid on the grounds that the government needs to comply with the law and should be open to challenge in the courts.

LE

I appreciate that, but there are exceptions to every rule and as every state’s first consideration should be the protection of itself and its citizens, I can’t see many others having too much problem with it.

Possibly fair, although it turns out I was wrong. It transpires that making someone state-less is illegal under both international and British law. A conversation with a lawyer friend today informs me that the British Nationality Act 1981, which is binding on the government, applies.

War Hero

You know what dingerr? Clearly my posts get on your tits, I try to be civil and you just come across as someone with a big chip on each shoulder. Why don't you do both yourself and me a favour and just ignore me, eh?

You know what Mike Barton, you need to gain a bit of respect. If anybody would know about EOD, then i’ll Take dingers word for it, rather than a fat lipped nobody.
Besides have you got a road named after you? No I thought not

Last edited: 20 Apr 2019

I take pride in my incompetence and ability to wind up fellow Aarsers with my command of the English language and incompatible spelling.

Yet
Apparently on top of membership/supporting a bunch of peace living nutters, she went round with an AK encouraging other black bin-liner devotees to cover up, as well as sewed other devotees into their Sunday best.
Do keep up darling.

I take pride in my incompetence and ability to wind up fellow Aarsers with my command of the English language and incompatible spelling.

LE

Yet
Apparently on top of membership/supporting a bunch of peace living nutters, she went round with an AK encouraging other black bin-liner devotees to cover up, as well as sewed other devotees into their Sunday best.
Do keep up darling.