Book 28

NUTRITIONAL AND PHYSICAL DEGENERATION

By Weston A. Price

Book 29

MINERALS FOR THE GENETIC CODE by Charles Walters

Dr. Richard Olree believes that the key to the biological role of all trace minerals has been available to science for decades,but nobody realized it. Will his Standard Genetic Code Chart prove to be the Rosetta Stone of trace nutrients?Through sequencing the amino acids in the process of constructing proteins,Dr. Olree has traced all the elements to their participatory function in the life process. In this cutting-edge book, the connection is made between the physical, chemical and biological aspects of minerals and subatomic particles in the life process, and assignment is made of the specific mineral that governs each entry in the genetic code. Natural Sources of Fluorides – plants/food-Olree

THE GREATEST FRAUD – Fluoridation

Book 46

A New Book: -“THE CASE AGAINST FLUORIDE

Book 47

THE EFECTS OF FLUORIDES IN ANIMALS -National Academy of Sciences

Book 48

Oral Hygiene for children age 6 Years

Book 49

HEALING IS VOLTAGE by Jerry Tennant MD, MD(H), PSc.,D

Chronic disease is defined by having low voltage. This book tells you how to measure your voltage in each organ, how to correct it, and how to determine why your voltage dropped enough to allow you to get sick. 580 pages. It also has more information on fluoride.

Extract from: “Healing is Voltage” by Jerry Tennant, MD,MD(H), PSc.,D Page 99 (Third Edition) – “…However when chlorine and fluoride [+2.85 volts] are placed in the water, it turns into an electron stealer. Thus every time we drink such water, it steals electrons from us. The water we should be drinking should contain electrons and be clean and free from toxins…

Book50

ABOUT FLUORIDATION -1966

The case against mass medication.

by Harvey Day – 1966

Book51

COMPULSORY MASS MEDICATION

by P. Clavell Blount 1964

Book52

ACT NOWFor Freedom and Pure Waterby J. C. Stannard

Book53

The Case Against Fluoride: How hazardous waste ended up in our drinking water and the bad science and powerful politics that keep it there, by: P, Beck J, and Micklem HS, summarizes the historical, political, ethical, toxicological, and epidemiological scientific data behind drinking-water fluoridation.

The book concludes that, if proposed today, fluoridation of drinking water to prevent tooth decay would stand virtually no chance of being adopted, given the current status of scientific knowledge.

In part one of The Case Against Fluoride, “The Ethical and General Arguments Against Fluoridation”: The requirement for the informed consent of the patient before administration of a medication is a basic human right. Yet with fluoride, which is added to drinking water as a therapeutic intervention, no such permission is sought or given. The process is enforced on every member of the population. The authors explore this fact in the context of medical ethics. Another aspect is the efficacy of fluoridation as a therapy, which, the authors argue, is marginal at best and deleterious at worst. The fluoride used for water fluoridation is not of pharmaceutical grade, but is in fact a chemical waste by-product. The lack of any rigorous studies as to the efficacy of fluoridation programs, the authors contend, means that the whole process is experimental.

There is no control of “dose”— how much fluoride anyone receives from the water.

In the case of water fluoridation, according to the above authors, the chemicals that go into the drinking water that more than 180 million people drink each day in the United States are not even pharmaceutical grade, but rather a hazardous waste product of the phosphate fertilizer industry. It is illegal to dump this waste into the sea or local surface water, and yet it is allowed in our drinking water. To make matters worse, this program receives no oversight from the Food and Drug Administration, and the Environmental Protection Agency takes no responsibility for the practice. And from an ethical standpoint, say the authors, water fluoridation is a bad medical practice; individuals are being forced to take medication without their informed consent; there is no control over the dose and no monitoring of possible side effects.

Historically, fluoride was quite expensive for the world’s premier chemical companies to dispose of, but in the 50s and 60s, Alcoa and the entire aluminum industry—with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste—somehow sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable) idea of buying this poison and then injecting it into our water supply as well as into the nation’s toothpastes and dental rinses. Consider also that when sodium fluoride is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately one part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink one-half of one percent of the total water supply, the hazardous chemical literally “goes down the drain” and voila—the chemical industry not only has a free hazardous waste disposal system, but we have also paid them with our health and our pocketbooks for the process.

The aluminum and phosphate fertilizer industries were not alone.The American government’s atomic weapons program was also producing huge amounts of fluoride and was getting sued by famers for the damage done to their cattle [and crops].

A masterful synchronization of history and cutting-edge science shines new light on humanities darkest diagnosis. In the wake of the Cancer Genome Atlas project’s failure to provide a legible roadmap to a cure for cancer, science writer Travis Christofferson illuminates a promising blend of old and new perspectives on the disease.