ouch, that is rough.
While I do agree it was a huge generalization, most (I would say 88%) of extensions are Firebird oriented and only then back-ported to mozilla.
Heck this has been the case since Extension-Room was first started.
So his sacrasm is not so inapropriote in the thread. (athough this is the first Indep. Status report I have seen with so many Suite-only/compatible extensions. Pretty cool.

Yeah, this is off topic :)
And you are right, there are "quite a few extensions for Firebird which are porting Mozilla features".

But again, this is only "quite a few", out of currently 142 extensions for Firebird. :)

My whole purpose is not to flame war Suite/Vs/*Birds, just to bring up the argument that thanks to the *birds, we have many more extension devs these days.
I appreciate the suite as many others do, I just hate to see the *birds/dev/love/hate emotions in the community.
They are both very important.

If you look at the stuff mentioned in this update (he said, desperately attempting to get back on topic), they seem to be Mozilla only or Mozilla and Firebird. I'm not sure anyone was attempting to have a suite vs birds flame war. The initial post implied that nobody cared about any of this stuff and "we" only wanted Firebird news, bzbarsky's response was pointing out that there are people that don't care about Firebird and do care about this stuff...

People screamed about the suite being bloated and now most of you install all sorts of 'bloatware'...just to get it back in line with the suite...or to get even more features installed...I still don't get it...Bleh :-)