Guess the fear of falling masks an antidote: comic relief: but what if per chance the mask drops, literally as in ancient Greece? Can that coincide with an analysis of what lies below it?(the mask)? Is that what the birth of tragedy is all about? The shared but unknown depth of which it is said, not to individually look into?

Underground travelers must loose some of the fear, all of it would drop to the fears of the jungle, and perhaps leave to unimaginable terrors.

I think taxes are little more and can be so much less then the contribution made for the environment in play to make money. Advantage is a creation. Those who reap it should pay for it because they didn't create the condition. Society, culture and government did.It really fucks with my head from a human rights perspective but I can understand it from an evolutionary perspective. Are values cultural or genetic, or a mix

my goal in life is to die and no one notices.in other words; to live as audaciously as possible while drawing the least attention. or at best, something vaguely similar.

That Hume prefigured that argument sowed the seeds for existential doubtful reduction into simplicity is itself a test for a clarity which emulated their very effects, which then were easy to repress, or, contrary, appearing in the guise of freedom.

Such transforms are at times necessary for the elimination of conscious guilt and its suppression into surreliasm. , including those from the world of dreams.

This necessity is a product of political pressures, brought again through abrogation of threatening by darker doubles using politics in a variable quantitative sense. Its ultimate source consists in sympathetic kindness. The other side brings mallebility into the realm of possible critical states approaching self defeating and chaotic panic. and chaos.

Political foes must come to some terms of agreement if, they be to survive, even at the point of apparent collusion.

On the other hand, honesty and fidelity needs to flourish, in such unlikely situation.

Mallebility is what I understand You are alluding to, as the apparent reduction from the volume through the linear. That this is possible , butunlikely in the average person, for such a person would not be able to tolerate it. Its like reversal of prpgressip from the linear to the identifiable process without all the missed steps along the way.

Meno, I do not agree with the criticism of your intelligence. Depth, breadth, and sensitivity, and an always "full" sort of constitution are the colors I see on the horizon. Bravo. I appreciate your prose. Thanks you.

MagsJ, a pleasant surprise, thanks you for gracing these digs. Sloths, they are an interesting choice. Someone I became quite fond of sparing with was fond of the expression "slow and steady wins the race" That does involve a sort of meekness. Not so much for winning but for the steadiness in process.

my goal in life is to die and no one notices.in other words; to live as audaciously as possible while drawing the least attention. or at best, something vaguely similar.

Thanks all through I wonder about very deeply hidden irony. The best are indistinguishable and opaque.

For that reason the safest is to lie low and assume one can never really know.

For me, its not purely a matter of intelligence but a strange way of apprehension as perhaps Rudolf Steiner would have it. This stretch perhaps is supported by unusual phenomena generated at a point of intersection.

Some doubt this but the focus on it bring probability closer to certainty.

And I can't help thinking that You are beginning to suspect the defining mode of slippage from reason to its contrary.

Thanks all through I wonder about very deeply hidden irony. The best are indistinguishable and opaque.

For that reason the safest is to lie low and assume one can never really know.

Prediction. That is the test of knowing for me. I have been involved with a few subjects which are inventions of man that do fall within an extremely predictable outcome. That is the best of what I can know. The further away from our invention the less I feel is knowable. Too many variables we couldn't account for.

There aren't many circumstance that come along that baffle me with regards to commercial printing. The variables are quantifiable and their relationships well understood. The process is understandable.

Life in general and what we run up against aren't so well definable. The variables less quantifiable, and their relationships misunderstood.

I believe beyond that, only belief is left.

I find it ironic that mathematically Pi is an approximation, yet so much is mathematically based on it. And it works depending on how far out or how narrowly you carry out the decimal places. Out past 10K of decimal positions seems overkill.That's ironic.

And if that qualifies me as slipping from reason to it's contrary? Perhaps the limits of reason are recognizable.

my goal in life is to die and no one notices.in other words; to live as audaciously as possible while drawing the least attention. or at best, something vaguely similar.

As prediction, You're not much of a soothsayer. The mechanics of the future will require much more 0's in front of pi, and only if you give in to relative spacetime, will You dampen Your response conditional to current predictable human inventions.

Is the gate, consisting of and through Preception, closing or opening at this shortening time , defines Your limits to recognizable reason, through which , at a critical moment, we must choose between the point at which we can separate our reason from its negative, and thus define it!

It is harder to win here on this battlefield then it is on the real one.