I got curious about these cases, and found several opinions dismissing two of Fox's previous lawsuits. The first lawsuit, Fox v. Hawk, was dismissed sua sponte under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). (Cases filed pro se and in pauperis can be reviewed sua sponte under Hall v. Bellmon.) The Utah District Court gave Fox a chance to amend his Complaint, but the Amended Complaint still failed to state a claim and the case was ultimately dismissed on May 9, 2008.

Fox filed another pro se suit on February 27 of this year in the case Fox v. Eyring. Fox identified Henry B. Eyring as the leader of the Mormon Church, and alleged various claims, including that Eyring and the Church had violated his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and §1985 and had cyberstalked him. Acting sue sponte, the Utah District Court again found Fox's claims to be baseless and dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim.

Not easily deterred, Frank G. Fox filed a new case in his home state of Louisiana a mere week after the dismissal of the Eyring case. In Fox v. Tippetts he again alleges civil rights violations by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Fox says that the Church hasn't yet responded to the lawsuit, and I haven't seen any of the filings. However, unless Fox's pleadings have improved significantly since Eyring, this case may be doomed to a swift dismissal as well.

Go to the lawsuit at PACER ......Frank G Fox v Howard J Hawk. This explains the technology. "Howard J Hawk" went into my Yahoo email account and erased over 100 emails. He told me this. On the other hand, I have never met this man, nor talked to him or emailed him. I have had no contact whatsoever. Nor do I know anyone who knows him. If this is so, how did he get my email password?

The reason why they are doing this? Because they are afraid and they don't want anyone to know they have this technology. I only figured it out about 6 months ago myself. In effect, they want to know what I am doing and who I am talking to. They are not supposed to have this technology. It is highly classified.

(Here is my bio. I am listed in Who's Who in America, have 4 published books, and 4 college degrees. More importantly, I have nothing against the Church. I have good friends who are Mormons, very fine people. But I think the Elders are using the Church to make money and they don't want anyone to know about it. I have been sending emails out to newspaper editors and others for over a year regarding this matter. I have complained to the Church. The lawsuits are a last resort. I didn't want to do it, but it is a way to get people to listen and pay attention.)

Frank, you say that Hawk "told" you he hacked into your account but in the same sentence you say "On the other hand, I have never met this man, nor talked to him or emailed him. I have had no contact whatsoever."

So, if you have had no communication with him how is it possible that he told you he hacked into your email account?

He uses the same technology as in these two lawsuits .... it is classified technology. I can hear him and he can hear me. He utilizes the Church's Iridium sattellite capabilities. It is like a phone conversation but with remote equipment. Do a Google search on "Remote neural monitoring."

Watch this video, (there are a couple of commercials first) the technology that the NSA (and now the Church) has is similar, but about 10 times more advanced. The Church is not supposed to have this. It is still classified.

There is an ongoing investigation into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon Church) by the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC Case #08/735). The FPPC is looking into both the Church’s lack of reporting its non-monetary contributions to Prop 8, and also whether NOM was, in fact, established as a front group by the Salt Lake City based Mormon Church. The Mormon Church has used this tactic in several states beginning in Hawaii in 1996.

Frank, I'm not going to post your second to last comment unless you modify it. You can still make a your argument without 'naming names' or revealing personal information. Also, there are many ways in which someone could have got into your email account without using top secret technology.

This is my last comment on the matter, because this ia a lawsuit and I don't want to give away everything I know...... but I used to be an electrician, so I began to think of ways I can physically prove the existence of this satellite signal. So, I bought a "Ghost meter." You can find then at ebay. What I discovered is that I have a constant EMF on my body, that of .5 milliwatts, when I should not have anything, as the meter is adjusted to compensate for the body's natural EMF field.

I have names and other proof, that normally, would be impossible to know without this techology existing and being utilized.

Where is your proof that the LDS Church keeps files on its critics? What specific instances can you point to that show Church leaders encouraging its members to discriminate against its critics? What Constitutional right is the LDS Church trying to take from you?