Just another WordPress.com site

Menu

Tag Archive | Washington

Anytime a country has to legislate basic manners and civility, it is an indication that the country becoming a third world-esque nation. Maryland is already considering street harassment laws, while it is rumored that Los Angeles, California has already passed ordinances in which street harassers will receive citations. Yet France, on a national level decided to officially tackle the pervasive issue of sexual/street harassment. At least one western nation is taking a stand. America, leader of the free world, what will you do?:

Men in France could be fined €90 for harassing women in the street Thursday 25 January 2018 12:25 GMT

Men in France could face fines of €90 (£78) for making lewd comments about women in public, under new plans to tackle street harassment.

A government report recommends enforcing the fine for behaviour that infringes on “the freedom of movement of women in public spaces and undermines self-esteem and the right to security”.

The plans come from a parliamentary working group on street harassment launched by gender equality minister Marlene Schiappa.

A longtime ally of President Emmanuel Macron, Ms Schiappa said in September that new measures were needed to address the “grey zone between consented seduction and sexual aggression”.

Men who make loud and lewd comments about women, follow them or block their path could be fined, according to measures suggested in the report.

The parliamentary group suggested imposing a €90 fine on those who pay immediately, increasing to €200 (£174) if it is paid within 15 days and €350 (£304) if the payment is later than that.

It did not recommend impose fines for wolf-whistling, according to French daily Le Croix, contrary to earlier reports.

The report is set to be presented to Ms Schiappa next week, along with France’s Minister of Justice Nicole Belloubet and Minister of the Interior, Gerard Collomb. The ministers will then put a bill on sexism and sexual violence to parliament.

Mr Macron has said tacking street harassment will be a priority for his government and in November said ”women in the republic cannot be afraid to go out” .

I wanted to take a further look into gang stalking in general, and my continued personal experiences of black “Christians” targeting me.

Of course stalking is an unlawful/criminal act, so it does not surprise me in this day and age that black “Chrsitians” (both male and female) are the primary perpetrators of it. Most of them are ghetto, faux gangster, down-low, over the top false maschismo and down-low lesbians. This is a fact. However, let’s take a deeper look into gang stalking.

Gang stalking involves a group of individual, some have argued, that are part of a ‘system.,’ Some have argued that gang stalking is governmental. Let’s being with the understanding that gang stalkers are social degenerates who have no means nor intention to create any progress in their lives. Thus, we are, for now taking a gander of this system from a socially dysfunctional perspective. The system is to destroy, annihilate, embarrass and or impoverish the targeted individual through gaslighting, stalking and street harassment. Gang stalkers are part of groups but not in obvious clusters that laymen have witnessed on the news who engage in the ‘knockout’ game. These are yet another group of criminals who travel in packs similar to wolves and target random individual.

Someone could easily think I am a random individual since I don’t know any of the black pagan “Christians” who engage in this activity directed towards me, but unfortunately this is to the contrary. This group of people selects an individual that they have been watching, observing, sending texts and emails about for weeks, months and in most cases years. A targeted individual usually have a talent, skill, personality or perceived benefit that this system wants access to. Beware, it is not because they desire you for you, no, they are envious—they seek to take by destruction that which they cannot have access to, which is you.

What I have noticed in the Washington, D.C. metro area, including Maryland, is that most black pagan “Christians” are hateful and jealous of people in general. Whatever their personal failings, desires or general hate will not dissipate if they ever achieve their sinister goals. No, they will still be left the same empty shells of soulless bodies that they invited demonic spirits to inhabit just as before they targeted an individual. These are the things you will observe about them:

These black pagan “Christians” find joy in disrespecting, gaslighting, physically attacking and verbally abusing total strangers for sport or to see if that targeted individual will break.

These strangers know personal details about your life, share information about you with other strangers. Black pagan “Christians” like to watch their prey to sense their awareness of their impending attacks. Any normal person would respond with apprehension that total strangers are trying to get into your personal life just so they can insult and perpetrate even more criminal acts against you.

Targeted individuals are usually selective, have or maintain high standards regarding what type of people they would allow themselves to be in contact with and are focused on higher goals. For gang stalkers, their goals are nefarious and they seek to curse them upon the targeted individual.

Gang stalkers are part of a system, not a progressive one that seeks to build character, community and build strong relationships. It is a simple groupthink mentality of hatred and dissatisfaction with their own lives. Thus a targeted individual who is not a willing participant in their ‘staged’ arena is someone who sees through their façade of fake ‘pro-black’ consciousness, false disdain of certain systems as they are the exact replica who purvey a similar system on members of their own race.

They are of the most evil of hypocrites when it comes to race matters, spirituality and belief in God. As mentioned so many times that most street harassers are demonic, and upon research those who have studied gang stalkers have consistently purported that it is a spiritual war, I would dare add that it is a mental war as well.

Gang stalkers, both the sexual depraved black pagan “Christian” males and the undercover black “Christian” lesbian who are dissatisfied with the direction of their lives, are unapologetically OBSESSED with the targeted individual. Their obsession has caused even further social dysfunction in their ability to act like normal human beings. They have an inability to integrate for the purposes of learning to better themselves, nor do they care to. Gang stalkers who are another form of street harassers are the embodiment of the demonic spirit whose primary arsenal is deception, diversion and distraction. The targeted individual is the diversion and distraction from their own personal failings in life and the deception is the modis operandi or justification they use to rationalize their criminal and indecent conduct.

Female gang stalkers among black pagan “Christians” of today are usually lesbian. Think about it for a moment: what normal functioning, well-adjusted grown women in western society bothers another grown woman who is a total stranger for no reason? For what purpose? They are trying to get the attention of heterosexual women because the targeted individual’s mere existence is an affront to their well-being. Black female pagan “Christian” gang stalkers will follow you into the bathroom (yes, this true), will find ways to ‘brush up’ against a female targeted individual and will also attempt to instigate an altercation either by putting their hands on the targeted woman, standing too close behind and snorting and exaggeration of clearing the throat. This is very disgusting and that’s their goal to show the targeted individual who they really are in a subversive manner while ironically seeking that targeted individual’s approval. Female black lesbian gang stalkers are obsessed with straight women of their own race and this nothing more than sexual/street and workplace harassment.

Black pagan “Christians” hate Sunni Muslims, especially those of the same race as them. Imagine these types of “Christians” applaud lesbian, switchhitters in their houses of worship, multiple children born out of wedlock with multiple fathers, down-low black males, black males raping their own mothers and children, acceptance of their disrespecting others as long as they pay their ‘tithes,’ vandalism as long it is against someone they agree on who is their target, dishonest black pagan “Christian” politicians, their religious leaders disrespecting women; but for some reason they cannot handle law abiding, highly educated Sunni Muslims who mind their business? Think about it for a minute, why is every sin and evil act condoned by this core group of today’s black “Christians”? It is because they are minions of the anti-Christ and whatever the TRUE God says do not do, they say do–just like Satan. They are the biggest undercover purveyors of the Church of Satan.

Gang stalkers do not walk in groups. They position themselves in certain places known to be frequented by the individual, separately. It is not that they are being insidious. They believe that their goal to target the individual will be more affective if they do it at different times of the day, with different people as part of a mind game. Gang stalkers make it obvious that they are part of this group as they consistently are on their mobile phones disseminating and transferring data that they have gathered about the individual. Thereafter, they will stare at you with a look or accompanied with a snort or some clearing throat growl to indicate that you are the targeted individual.

There is really no need to discuss in detail political motives that black pagan “Christian” gang stalkers and street harassers may have for targeting individuals of their own race. We know from history that every black leader, black person who was intelligent, had potential or could have been a force for social change (for black people’s benefit, mind you) was undermined by a black pagan “Christian.” For example, Hughie Newton a member of the Black Panther Party was assassinated because a black “Christian” told details of not just the building but where his actual bedroom was. El Hajj Malik Shabazz, formerly known as Malcolm X was killed by black “Christians.” The shooters were neither part of the former group he left nor were they Sunni Muslims, they were black “Christians” who were government agents. I always found it so ironic how black “Christians” attempt to pretend to look up to these leaders when they in their own generation attempt to destroy any potential that may spring forth out of their race. Even during the Civil Rights march where black peaceful protesters had signs which read ‘I AM A MAN’ the primary photographer was a black “Christians” who worked for the U.S. government and merely sought to get closer to Martin Luther King, Jr.’s inner circle. So, if one learned even some tidbits of American and black history, there is no surprise that gang stalkers are dark-skinned, black pagan “Christians.” The same ones who will falsely disparage the targeted individual are the same ones yelling about being targeted by police, police brutality and black unity. Their evil and hypocrisy is so normalized amongst them who are part of their ‘system’ that is very clear that those who do not fall for their smoke and mirrors rhetoric would easily become targeted individuals. It was always these types who were the primary agents of the harm that befell targeted individuals.

They can be the biggest enemy of blacks in general and despite the targeted individual’s talent, intelligence or skill, they seek to destroy that person because they believe it should have been them who possessed those qualities or perceived characteristics. Never mind of taking personal responsibility for the direction their lives took, their failure to actually take the time to cultivate such virtues within themselves, no they rather destroy the targeted individual to placate the gaping hole that lies within them, where decency, honesty and code of ethos should lie.

Rape, street harassment and sexual assault are not only perpetrated by black males but also their black “Christian” female counterparts. One of the most publicized rapes committed by a black woman occurred in Seattle, Washngton in which a two black women picked up a white guy hitching a ride and pulled a gun on him while the other raped him:

In Maryland, Washington, D.C. and Virginia, a core group of black “Christian” females harass other black women. There is a subtle known fact that many of these black “Christian” females are butch or closeted lesbians and seek to hit on, verbally abuse and mock heterosexual women, especially if the latter is modest and religiously clad. You will witness these black lesbian “Christians” (oxymoron) in their best passive aggressive antagonism, beginning with an exaggerated, abrupt grunt or cough to get another woman’s attention; followed with jumping (literally) in another woman’s face or cutting her off the road or in line. Some of these black female street/sexual harassers will snatch your hand in the grocer check out line or as you use a computer in the public library.

Black FEMALE street harassers are just as dangerous and sexually deviant as their modern day male counterparts-so decent, heterosexual woman we must take heed of our safety on more levels than one. It’s so ironic and hypocritical for American “Christians” to teach children in school that their body belongs to them, warning signs of an inappropriate adult, etc., only to realize that as an adult no rules apply; both men and women will violate children and other women’s bodily integrity in broad daylight, that men will venture to social media erroneously defending their right to touch women strangers and street harass them while bashing other religions and culture. You will find that witnesses will pretend not to see anything or choose not to get involved resulting in lack of law enforcement of crimes as well as rape culture. So the question must be posited of what chance does a decent, law-abiding, heterosexual, religious woman have against these degenerates when they rape, molest or sexually assault their own children, let alone their neighbor’s? (here is a sample of what has been going on for decades):

There is no clear or easy answer. If women aren’t molesting children, they are harassing heterosexual women and making passes at them. This is a great portion and normalized social dysfunction of black “Christian” culture in the United States. There is no clear or easy answer except preventative measures which includes discerning their traits and characteristics so they may be readily identified as normally functioning, heterosexual women do not conduct themselves in such a manner.

There is so much disgusting conduct and breaking of common law, the laws of nature and human decency that I thought it necessary to take a break from the usual posts of black “Christian” males and their street/sexual harassment and assault of women who are total strangers.There is an increase in recent history of black American “Christians” raping their mothers, impregnating their daughters in the United States. So when a black man street harasses, what chance does a woman who is a total stranger have to be protected from their criminal inclinations, especially in broad daylight?This is a disclaimer, these true stories are graphic and quite honestly may induce vomiting:

…they rape their own daughters:

39-year-old father came home from prison & impregnated his 17-year-old daughter. November 21, 2017

This is just a sampling of stories in recent years demonstrating the demonic possession of today’s black male “Christians” in modern American society.You will find them with obnoxious, onerous and arrogant personalities as their belief of do ‘what thou wilt’ is their primary modus operandi, thus committing all types of evil and debauchery is what they are most proud of.Now, just imagine all the other stories of mothers and children being raped by their black “Christian” fathers in recent decades that have not made it into mainstream media’s various platforms. Then, take a moment to imagine all the other similar crimes where victims have been threatened or coerced into not even filing criminal charges.

Still, there are black males who are remain in denial as to what they have become but most black women who can at least discern truth from falsehood, have worked as social workers, child advocates, attorneys and the like seen first hand the proliferation of these types of cases OFTEN and for several decades. Unfortunately, certain black “Christians” with their blind loyalty to men who seek to destroy them all will deny, defend and deflect because they suffer from a longstanding psychosis compounded with Stockholm Syndrome with their ritualistic black male abuser.

These black American males will transgress the boundaries of consanguinity, common sense and human decency; then there should be no surprise that these hyper-sexual deviants would violate the bodily integrity of total strangers– let alone their own children! They respect no law or the concept of human life. Black males use the generic response that “white men do it too,” as if to say if some whites will sin, and delve into all types of degeneracy the black males of today’s self esteem is so low and so tied up into doing ANYTHING that a white does that it somehow automatically makes them equal in social standing. No, this makes you all devils regardless of race. For those of you who are not partial to religion, you can skip the rest of this paragraph. For those of you who can find wisdom in sayings and narrations and see how it can fit different situations, please read on. When I thought about this, it reminded me of a hadith, which to my knowledge is authentic but I am no theologian. Yet, I find it poignant in the debauchery and behavior of today’s black “Christian” male street harassers, assaulters, sexual abusers and molesters of women and children: “…You will indeed follow the ways of those before you, hand span by hand span, and an arms length after another. Even if they enter into a lizard’s hole, you will follow them…”

So much for modern society. Judeo-Christian values. Moral and democratic leader of the free world? Think again.

These black “Christian” males are actually Satanists, anti-Christ and demonic no matter how often they spew Jesus name as if they are imposing a curse on a random person who is of a different religion. You now see them bragging of how they practice voodoo and African pagan religions. You will even find them stating that it is hard to ‘program’ black women as if they are objects to be controlled and used as a rubbish bin for them to solely lay waste to their lowly desires. To deflect from their own deviancy they often enjoy calling the white man the devil (yes he is guilty too), but more often than not BLACK males are ATTACKING and verbally abusing black women who have done nothing wrong but dare to exercise their constitutional rights to walk freely, freedom of assembly and dare to breathe air in public while you lurk

All Rights Reserved

with heavy eyes, lustful souls and irrational temperament of a jackal seeking to devour their prey. All the while attempting to shroud your trident and harmful horns in a façade of black consciousness.

So the next time you are walking down the pathway, are at a bookstore, the post office or your local grocer, do not hesitate to keep your distance from these pugnacious vagrants and do whatever you can to seek help from a witness and local law enforcement against today’s black male street harassers (modern day coons). A woman who is minding her business, being a decent, law abiding citizen in her own homeland should not be treated like this. Remember this is not only violent crime, but gender-based discrimination and a violation of law, let alone basic human decency.

Reported cases of upskirting — taking unauthorized pictures underneath a woman’s skirt or dress — in the D.C. area have soared in the past three years.

A team of experts reviewed court records in D.C., Virginia and Maryland, and found cases had jumped 70 percent since 2015, according to a report published late last month by NBC Washington. Advocates said these cases, meant to demean and degrade women – including female students – in public, have become a growing threat with the growth of smart phones and social media.

Many of these cases occur at Metro stations, where women are three times more likely than men to be victims of harassment, according to a 2016 report from the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority – the agency that oversees the Metro.

Claire Gould, the communications director for Collective Action for Safe Spaces, a non-profit organization that works to combat harassment and assault, said harassment occurs most often in crowded areas, like a Metro station or Metro car.

“It’s always frustrating when women, in particular, have to be more careful in order to avoid things like this.”

“It’s demeaning and an invasion of privacy,” Gould said in an email. “Like any kind of public harassment, we believe everyone deserves the right to move through public spaces without fear of being harassed or assaulted.”

Gould said officials should start a public awareness campaign to curb harassment on the Metro, collect data on the number of incidents and train employees and transit police on how to address sexual harassment.

Terri Poore, the policy director for the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, said upskirting cannot be prevented easily because it occurs in crowded, busy areas — making it difficult to track down perpetrators.

“There is no shortcut around the fact that people are going to have to have courage and stepping in when they see these sorts of behaviors happening and not leave the onus on the victim,” she said. “Really everyone needs to take an active part in preventing this kind of behavior.”

Although upskirting is considered a form of voyeurism, experts said it is difficult to prosecute in D.C. courts. Consent for taking a picture or recording is only required when the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy according to voyeurism laws in D.C.

In 2014, a D.C. judge dismissed charges against a man accused of taking photos up a woman’s skirt at the Lincoln Memorial, citing that the accuser could not have a reasonable expectation of privacy while on the National Mall, according to a Huffington Post report.

Amanda Lindamood, the director of training and community engagement for the D.C. Rape Crisis Center, said it’s difficult to prosecute upskirting because laws pertaining to sexual assault are relatively new and there is no general consensus about how they can be enforced and adjudicated.

“Every district, or every jurisdiction, approaches legislation related to violence in a very different way and it’s kind of a new category of consent to think about it, again as just not a physical violence, but that it has to do with images, has to do with social media,” Lindamood said. “It’s kind of a very new section of the law we’re playing catch up on.”

Students said upskirting and general street harassment is a constant menance, especially on an urban campus.

Freshman Andie Kemmerle said it’s aggravating that women have to constantly be on alert when riding the Metro.

“It’s always frustrating when women, in particular, have to be more careful in order to avoid things like this,” she said. “Whereas, it should be that people shouldn’t be doing this in the first place, but hopefully people are for their own safety, being careful about their surroundings when they’re in public.”

In February, the advocacy group Collective Action for Safe Spaces launched a petition that has garnered 333 signatures to urge the the D.C. Council to pass a bill to training and educate D.C. employees about sexual harassment.

“What can people do to keep themselves safe when the law doesn’t even know what’s legal and what’s illegal anymore?”

That same month, some students accused construction workers renovating Corcoran Hall of street harassment and catcalling. D.C. businesses have installed street exhibits and initialed training programs in recent months to try to prevent harassment across the city.

Gabrielle Battino, a sophomore, said living on an urban campus in a densely populated city makes sexual harassment more of a concern.

“It sucks that I’m a woman on campus and I don’t feel safe 100 percent of the time and I should because this is my community,” Battino said. “I guess the only thing I can do is be cautious and be an advocate for the issue.”

Tamara Criss, a graduate student in public health, said D.C should criminalize upskirting because it will encourage more victims come forward to report incidents.

“You can only imagine no one is going to report anything if nothing is going to happen. I think that increasing the criminalization of the activity would be smart,” Criss said. “What can people do to keep themselves safe when the law doesn’t even know what’s legal and what’s illegal anymore?”

It’s usually possible to tell when it’s about to happen. The signal could be a set of dull eyes staring out from the middle of a group of teenage boys. Or a brief smirk. Could be from a man in a suit, could be from someone looking like a grandad. Sometimes there’s no warning, just the prickling sixth sense of “I’m about to be told how my tits are looking today by a complete stranger”.

“Catcalling” is exasperating and humiliating, but something to be lived with if you’re female and you go outside a lot. Racism, ableism, homophobia and transphobia often get mixed into the cocktail of abusive comments, too, and as Noa Jansma’s @dearcatcallers project showed, they come from all ages and all classes. We recipients live with it, because of course we do. There is far worse than words for us to live through out there – #MeToo can show you a sample (only from women of certain economic backgrounds lucky enough to have an internet connection of course). Yet, strangely, a peaceful acceptance of street harassment as “only words” is something I’m yet to feel.

Violence could follow any insult or sexual comment, yelled or whispered, from a stranger on the street

Instead, each unprompted “slut” or “ugly dyke” from people I’ve never met causes embarrassment, irritation, but mostly anger within me. And it’s an anger that doesn’t bleed out; it builds. Latest example (which I’ll forget as new ones replace it): last week in Houston, a man was offering his opinion on each woman who walked by him. One in front of me was told she had a “nice ass”, I was called a “bitch”. I turned around and advanced on him, startled he grabbed at my forearms and babbled excuses. I yelled for him to get his damn hands off of me, until he let go and swiftly left the area, visually resentful.

Despite enjoying humiliating people who try to do the same to me first (I’m a “bitch”, remember), it’s no real outlet for the humiliation of street harassment – it’s a stupid and reckless thing to do. I know that, because everyone who has been catcalled knows that. The words of street harassment fall on a spectrum of disrespect. Violence could follow any insult or sexual comment, yelled or whispered, from a stranger on the street. The words are merely an opening parry, or a hint of how little your rights, or very existence, are respected. Women are still being hurt by people who hate them, everywhere.

The words are nothing compared with what they could be, but are also a reminder of that. They’re intended that way: a smug reminder, a smirking warning – don’t get too comfortable in your life. Don’t think you’re entirely safe out here; you aren’t. The actual message, and motive, behind street harassment is quiet and assured, and that’s why it’s so grating and tiring. Because we already know.

#MeToo is still so dissonant. Is sexual assault, violence, rape culture and ingrained misogyny actually being recognised, openly and honestly, as wrong at last? Are missing stairs not being stepped around any more?

More familiar and less confusing is Bryan Cranston commenting that there’s “room down the road” for forgiveness of outed abusers like Harvey Weinstein; that’s to be expected. Also predictable – Jennifer Garner’s assertion that it’s women who need to be “more of a force” to stop assault. Saturday Night Live and Lena Dunham’s “but my friend wouldn’t do that”-style silencing statements aren’t surprising, either. Women are more used to excuses like this than to being listened to. They’re symptoms of a sexist status quo being protected – whether Bryan, Jennifer, Lena, and their cohorts realise that or not.

Catcallers and street harassers, however, know they’re maintaining a system of sexism – it’s the motive, and that’s why it angers me so much. In 2015 a survey by Cornell University and the anti-harassment campaign Hollaback! on street harassment found that an international average of 84% of women have been victims of street harassment between the ages of 11 and 17. The 2014 Stop Street Harassment survey also featured some scary (but unsurprising, if you’ve experienced it) statistics of women being “reminded”.

In light of #MeToo, will the upcoming US-based survey report lower numbers of street harassment? Probably not – not yet. I suspect harassers will be offering more messages of the misogyny that still exists in the world for a while. But that’s a signal too – that change is coming, and they know it.

For a while now several Americans (both black and white) have decried mainstream media’s attempt to designate BLM as a legitimate civil rights group. Some have attempted to prove their source of funding as part of a larger agenda to divide and conquer the populace even further, i.e., breed chaos.

Whatever the reasons, most Sunni Muslim Black Americans know that BLM and its supporters, black “Christian” Americans do not stand for the rights of all black Americans, including them. They often defend the suspected criminal behavior of black male criminals who are the products of stereotypical inner city single black mother homes with a core belief to divert, distract, use or otherwise not take personal responsibility for their actions. In furtherance of these teachings, as well the Satanic doctrine of ‘do what thou wilt,’ these particular blacks will target, harass, mock law abiding, religious or any other black American who is minding their business and do not share and even are disgusted by their views. The majority of black American “Christians” could care less about the plight of black Americans, especially those such as Sunni Muslim black Americans who do not support the other side of other black supporters of BLM. Social media has revealed that several of the founders of BLM are homosexual or transgender and have admitted that most of their base support stems from those who fall into the same categories. This group has nothing to do with protecting the rights of heterosexual, law abiding and/or highly educated and religious black Americans. These types of blacks and ‘apes in heat’ of today have nothing to do with the real Black Americans’ true legacy of dignity, decency and fighting for true justice and civil rights of the old guard.

Anyway, when the immigration controversy was at its recent apex, BLM seized the opportunity to pretend that it was in defense of migrants from Muslim majority countries. The truth had to be revealed that this group and most of its supporters despises Sunni Muslims, street/sexually harass them on the job and in public spaces and ostracized Sunni Muslim members of their family, whether immediate or extended. Even though thousands are multi-generation Sunni Muslims or converts to this particular faith of their own accord. BLM, its supporters and sympathizers would like the public to think that it is the friend of any group that the white majority is perceived to be against, yet they are worse than they. Any whites who have an objection to Sunni Muslims in general have no problem in voicing their opinions, which is better than having a group with a deep-seated hatred for Muslims to pretend not to only as a means to kill two birds with one stone: false self-righteous indignation to whites and a sly attempt to get Sunni Muslims to let their guard down to a group of people who have no good intentions towards them. They believe it is especially easy to do so at the hands of immigrant Muslims who have not experienced a lifelong interaction with them and are likely more susceptible to their connivance. I continue to share my personal experiences with black “Christian” Americans to warn people, regardless of your belief, ideology and whether you think another person is in error for having it; be warned of today’s black American “Christians” most are not sincere, have bad character, deceptive and seek to harm you either spiritually/emotionally (verbal abuse, invocation of curses, etc.) or physically (assault, street harassment, sexual harassment). This includes both genders. They have never apologized, atoned nor made amends and are not deserving of forgiveness.

That being said, if you would like quick links to PARTS I-IV, please tick the following links:

So, you are probably wondering, how can so many incidents happen in the Washington, D.C. metro area and its surrounding suburbs? Let’s take a look at the profile of a typical street harasser shall we? He or she is usually uneducated, poor, dark-skinned (inclined to aggression), made a series of poor decisions in his life, is unfortunate looking has low self-worth and thus seeks external validation from and latch himself onto a total stranger. Although there are plenty of attractive people around the world who are handsome and beautiful who happened to be dark complexioned, this is not the case for the typical black “Christian” American street harasser. Their natural ugly facial features, combined with an unclean spirt and a darkened heart is only highlighted by their dark skin. When he or she meets resistance or is not acknowledged, their true nature of unclean spirit, hostile insecurity and wicked desperation is readily manifested.

For decades, the world has witnessed countless stories of uneducated, ghetto, stereotypical blacks shooting and murdering one another. What was always absent is that 97% of the perpetrators were ghetto Black “Christian” Americans. When the casual observer moves for examining the murder rate among them and against victims who have no affiliation with them and of the same race, you can easily discern that these similar types are prone to street harassing, assaulting, insulting, accosting and molesting black American strangers (especially Sunni Muslims who are covered and are of the same race as them). With today’s black American “Christian” females one has to be even more careful, as many of them are closeted lesbians, including the ones with children, and have been exposing themselves reality television programs. They conduct themselves in odd and aggressive manners towards women who are complete strangers to them as a form of under-handed social engagement. Even black “Christian” males who are guilty of so much harm to all black women, men and children and are of their same communities refer to them as beasts and ‘beasties’ because of their savagery and natural aggression towards innocent victims. Their behavior does not reflect a rational, well-adjusted woman and its intention is to cause harm to straight women of their own race, especially if they can readily see that you are a religious woman (covered Sunni woman).

They are filled with hate, self-loathing, envy and cannot be trusted. I also noticed that these black “Christian” vagrants will nearly always defend a wrongful assailant and lambast victims in nearly all circumstances and spew non-sensical “pray for them” when referring to the CRIMINAL. Why is this? because most of their men nowadays are on the down-low and nearly all the rest are simply homosexuals who justify their conduct in Jesus’ name, they lie as a matter of course, falsely impugned the character of others for sport, they actually conjour demons in their houses of worship but try to hide it calling it praise dancing though they are humping the ground in a suggestive manner, they defend homosexuality among their men who deposit their seeds in them without marriage or other responsibility, they have taken advantage of the welfare system by agreement for as long as they are single multiple times mothers they receive benefits. It is no wonder when they witness someone who is religiously clad, at peace and mind their own business it is affront to everything they defend (anti-Christ). As this dysfunction is normalized among the underbelly of the today’s ever-devolving black American “Christian” race, it is no surprise that more stories are waiting to be told of their criminal and savage behavior:

1. One sunny day I was walking towards the Food Lion which was south of the sidewalk I was on which is in between Crain Highway and Ritchie Highway in Glen Burnie (Anne Arundel County), Maryland. A dark-skinned ghetto black female was sitting on a wooden bench that would be on my right side and began to yell “hey, you, the lady with that African thing on her head!” She began to engage in some hysterical laughter which apparently was brought on by her entertaining herself by insulting random strangers who walked by. I was more abruptly shocked as I was of the same race as her, wearing my hijab in a traditional manner (draped and lower) and had an inkling of traditional African dress. I noticed that whites in the vicinity looked at her like she was crazy and being rude. It was only when she was not met with the approval of white passer-bys that she stopped. This is another indicator of ghetto black “Christians”, they ALWAYS seek a pat on their head or other social approval by whites by attacking or attempting to disgrace another Black Americans who are minding their business.

2. One year I had the opportunity to attend a conference civil rights and human rights and what countries are doing to resolve these violations. The conference had workshops, official side panels and events in which targets of xenophobia discussed their experiences and a reconvening of non-profit organizations. An Afro-Canadian woman asked whether I would join her in witnessing a video press release of this one organization that was supposed to be about the upliftment of black people in America. It became obvious that the head of the organization, a dark-skinned black “Christian” female had not followed the rules and was quite rude with a conference organizer who was a white male. They were shooting their video without prior permission, including not obtaining the proper authority to use a side office. The dark-skinned black “Christian” female had a cropped coarse haircut (like a black male’s) was enraged and became quite uncivil with the man who was just doing his job. She was belligerent and began to yell and curse at the organizer. Now, other than members of her organization, only myself, the Canadian and one other person were not a part of their group, yet we watched the entire incident unfold. Nevertheless, everyone present just stared at her for her inappropriate, disrespectful behavior with the conference organizer and really towards the entire conference (everyone who is following the schedule, rules and protocols). When she finally obtained some level of calm and notice the silence and stares from everyone this was her exact response.: “I apologize to all my “Christian” brothers and sisters…for my behavior…” She then rolled her eyes at me. So, in her eyes, the only people who took offense of her conduct was in her organization or in the alternative, anyone who was not in her group was also a target of her verbal tirade. This black female, who was supposed to be the president of a non-profit for civil rights for blacks felt that she could do whatever she wanted in another country, disrespect everyone and thought it was her prerogative and everyone else must concede to it. Her epic meltdown consisted of disrespecting me, a covered Sunni Muslim Black woman twice, because in her eyes, as well as so many of today’s black “Christians” civil rights do not pertain to all blacks just thugs, criminals, ghetto black “Christians”, black homosexual and down-low males and black transgenders. Yet, she felt herself to hold a standard of religious dogma. These are the people who falsely claim to be the garrisons of the legacy for civil rights for blacks—the very same ones who violate the civil rights of or disrespect other blacks without just cause other than their exorbitant bigotry.

3. It was an evening of Ramadan in which I was driving to a restaurant to break my fast. I was driving north on 295 (Baltimore-Washington Parkway) and had took the Anne Arundel/Casino exit for the restaurants location. Once you make your way up a small ramp-like street, the driver has the option to keep moving straight or merge further left to make a left turn. This area has five lanes, three to remain straight ahead and two left turning lanes. I turned on my left signal when a ghetto black “Christian” in an old model grey four door sedan, who had a tattered weave and knit cap was driving already in the middle lane. She began to yell at me as I waited for her to go, as she appeared to be heading straight. She refused to let me over and began calling me epithets such as “b@*#%.” I kept my signal on in order to remain calm and moved to the left lane closest to the remaining straight lanes. Apparently, she felt that unless she allows a driver to get into the lane, you have no right to. The light remained on red at Dorchester Boulevard. At this point, she was two cars behind but in the left lane closer to the median. She slammed her door after getting out and wanted to escalate a non-situation into an altercation. It was not until I picked up the phone and she knew I was calling the police that she ran back to her car, speedily drove back into the straight lanes and sped off. I concluded that she had no intention of visiting any of the shops there or even lived in the area. This black American “Christian” female was seeking to cause harm to a covered Muslim of the same race because she thought she could get away with it. Nevertheless, I did nothing wrong and she knew that there were two lanes of witnesses to her conduct.

4. One early afternoon I went shopping at the Old Navy outlet at Arundel Mills Mall located at: 7000 Arundel Mills Circle, Hanover, Maryland 21076. There was an aisle with women’s tee shirts that I was entering into and as soon as I came near, two dark-skinned black “Christians” began to snicker, followed with rolling their eyes at me. One of them said to the other, “don’t sey nuffin’ ” and continued laughing. From what I could discern, one of the gestures was a mockery of me wearing hijab (religious head covering). I simply turned towards the merchandise in an attempt to ignore them and soon thereafter they walked away from the area.

5. A very similar incident as no. 4 above occurred when I went to the Macy’s at the Mall in Columbia, Maryland (Howard County). The incidents where identical, except these two women were both obese and louder. I also had my head in wrap that appeared more ethnic than religious but I they still squawked and laughed about my headdress. This occurred in the women’s section for plus size women when I ventured to the area only looking for the rest room. Also, in this particular incident, it was a white male who observed the two black, dark-skinned “Christians” behavior who began yelling at them and embarrassing them because it was apparent that either they were lesbians and/or some form of adult bullies who attempt to veil their own insecurities by targeting others. Although the evil duo became quiet, the gentleman refused to leave the area until they left. In an ironic twist, once a again, a white man had to protect a decent woman from two ghetto, savage evil black “Christian” females.

6. One morning, I decided to visit the Howard County Columbia library, this branch located at 6600 Cradlerock Way, Columbia, Maryland 21045. There were several other patrons already waiting in the lobby as the librarian had not yet released the sliding iron gate at the entrance of the library. Some were returning books, others were on their cell phone. I was standing, just like everyone else and waiting. I checked the clock on the wall and noticed that we had a few more minutes before we could enter. As I was waiting, a dark-skinned either obese or pregnant black “Christian” female appeared from behind my right side and just came into my face for absolutely no reason. I had never seen her before. I did not know her from any place, and was just waiting. I looked back at her, thinking she had an odd question or the like, but she said nothing. As she stared at me, I stared back; she then made some look like most black females make when they want to fight you and want to make you flinch. I continue to say nothing and thereafter she retreated and I watched her to make sure she did not try to hit me from behind. She took some steps towards a white “Christian” woman who was probably her lover (more likely) or her handler and they hugged each other. It was a strange and dangerous moment, which made no sense even to the other people waiting in the lobby. I did notice that one white guy with a cell phone saw what was happening as he was closest to me and the gate, but he said nothing and just kept looking at his phone.

7. It was an early afternoon in Anne Arundel County in which I decided to go to the Royal Kebab located at 738 Rt.3N, Gambrills, MD 21054. It is part of a small complex of a Subway sandwich shop and gas station. Most people park at or near the gas pumps. On this occasion I did, I noticed that a dark-skinned, overweight, black male pedestrian suddenly went in front of the double doors and just stood there. He was simply staring at me while I was exiting my vehicle. He then pulled out his cell phone and pretended that he was talking with someone. He did not go into the place of business. He had no car so he wasn’t getting case and one may assume he was simply loitering like most black male ex-convicts (in Maryland, their criminal records usually include Maryland handgun violation/mandatory 5 years, CDS-controlled dangerous substance/Schedules I or Schedule II, and of course some form of assault) and vagrants do. However, he kept blocking the doors instead of going to a side wall or even inside where there is plenty of seating. I remained at the gas station pump while an Indian gas station worker wearing a green polo was already walking near me. He looked at the black male for a while as well and was making his way over. I asked him whether he would escort me (yes in broad daylight), inside. He politely agreed and as soon as the black male saw me walk towards the building with the employee he suddenly moved out of the way. After I purchased my buffet to go, I noticed the same black male was now inside, not speaking on his phone, nor buying any items—just loitering again, this time inside. It is good to remember to be observant and take offensive measures as black male “Christian” predators’ primary behavior is to lurk and loiter outside of places of business and disturb, harass or rob paying customers.

8. One very early fall morning I was commuting to Washington D.C. for work on 295-S (Baltimore Washington Parkway). It was cool enough to turn your heat on but one of those days where you had to balance your interior temperature as to not fog up your windows. I was driving in the left lane of the two-lane parkway and as usual with commuter traffic, it was at a standstill. My passenger rear window was rolled down only about an inch and a half. I heard a sinister voice in the middle of traffic yell, “hi haw ya doin’ in the middle of traffic while in my car. I turned to my right and at the window and there was a dark-skinned black male “Christian” driving a late model SUV with a disgusting smirk on his face staring at me. I hurriedly rolled my window up and returned looking straight ahead in my lane. Traffic began to pick up the pace and I drove as quickly as I could to not be near this black male’s vehicle.

9. One morning I went to the Columbia Workforce Center located at: 7161 Columbia Gateway Drive, Columbia, MD 21046. Protocol dictates that when a visitor seeks to use any of the services provided, one must sign in at the front desk. I decided to use the free computer lab to get some work done. Others may choose the option of visiting with a counselor and/or using the fax machine, copier machines or search guides provided. I was in the lab being productive, when a large dark-skinned black male “Christian” walked in and poked me harshly in my left arm. I looked at him like he was crazy because there was absolutely NO reason for a stranger to put their hands on a woman, let alone a religiously clad woman. He claimed he thought my name was something, which I knew he was lying because people who wait for a counselor sit out front in the waiting area where there is a row of seats. So, he decided to bypass all the people waiting in those seats and to disturb me. I did not have any headphones on, and it was apparent that I did not have this ‘urban’ stereotypical name. He had the audacity to be upset with me though he violated my bodily integrity for no reason at all and was trying to find a pretext to ‘talk to me.’ He was truly dark-skinned, obese and over 6′ feet tall and aggressive. He said, “oh are you so and so.” I responded with a simple “no.” I then turned away from him and back to the computer station I was seated at. Thereafter, he proceeded to semi-curse me out, saying “don’t you look like that at me, I work here.” So, he is defended his inappropriate and offensive conduct by saying that he works for the local government and therefore has the right to put his hands on people without permission and I should not be offended by it? Of course with state and federal jobs, these types of blacks whom usually populate support staff positions in this area are not disciplined. They possess ghetto black “Christian” privilege which has run rapid in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

10. One sunny late morning I ventured to the Starbucks at 13600 Baltimore Ave #308, Laurel, MD 20707 fruity black male. It is a smaller coffee house of the chain in the area and the area where customers can pick up drinks can be cramped. Some had already ordered their drinks online and were checking with the barista. Nothing initially appeared out of the ordinary. There was even a tall Caucasian Catholic priest waiting wearing his religious garb. Suddenly a dark-skinned flamboyant black male who had indicators of being a homosexual stepped into the area where most of us were. His behavior was quite noticeable as everyone, including myself had glanced at him. Apparently, he had some sort of disdain for Muslims or shame of himself or something. He came to the counter literally snatched his drink, stopped to look at me dead in my face, rolled his eyes and stomped off. It was obvious that I am a Sunni Muslim by my hijab, but what was even interesting is that he did not do anything similar to the Catholic priest, who was also in his religious attire. So, if both (he the Catholic priest and I the covered Sunni Muslim woman) have exhibited religious characteristics, why did the black male target me? It is because he knows that black women in general are not protected in American society. I also have to assume that seeing a religiously clad woman causes him to feel insecure or guilty about his lifestyle. Yet, not one person that I could tell laughed at him, mocked at him or even gave him dirty looks—but he felt the need to target his hatred and insecurity upon me. Black males who are even homosexual cannot even leave Black women alone.