No, but I don't get to pick which ones arouse me and which don't. I only get to choose how I respond to that arousal.

You seem to be confusing urges (or arousal, or attraction, or sexual orientation) with actions.

I choose who I have sex with; I don't choose who I'm attracted to.
Why shouldn't the same be true of someone who's gay?

OK. Cool. Now it is interesting. Now you are making sense. You are talking about a man who is born with a sexual desire for another man. This is not specific to one Man. Because just like the rest of us who find many women to be attractive so he too will find many men to be attractive.

So, we need data for this. Right? We can no longer speculate. We need science. I gave half of the picture in my sex test. The other half is the attraction to men. There is something called the Kinsey scale. I know a bit from trailers.

I think we need to update this for the age of porno, big data and fMRI. So to fix the picture, we would also have porno men with full erections, asking questions. But in this case you would excuse the straight man from spending no more than a few minutes looking at shit.

But seriously this is the whole point of the thread. The scientific method to determine if someone is Born Gay. Or if it is a choice. This test can be performed in many universities in both California and France who are centres for world wide porno industry.

man you are so dumb and lame. make sense. what is the point of this. I just gave "you" as an example. Your way of thinking and speaking. I give you an argument. What's your rebuttal? Find an example.
The flaw starts with your question. You have asked the wrong question and framed the issue around it, just so you don't counter argue what I am saying. Go back and make sense man.
What's the point? Again, if I say you win. You won't win anything. We are here to argue. Argue over the sex thing. Why homosexuality is not a sex thing.

BTW:
True gay movies are not so subtle about what is is really about to be gay. You don't get it from Will and Grace. You get it from "six feet under" and "angels in America".
It is a sex thing. They start out being confused. The media tells them, it is ok. You are "Born This Way". I gave you the counter argument for that. Born this way is impossible. How would the sodomite spread the gene. He doesn't like to fuck.
So, why tell him that he is born this way. If he is confused, why not guide him to what is best "for him".
Nick, you always say that you are not gay. I suspect that you are. But if you are not gay. Then you must like women. What is it about them that you like so much? Just give me an answer for that. Is that so difficult for you?

I'm not in the media.
I've said that I think it's not choice, and you have a right to think it's choice. You have accused the western media of white-washing.

I'm not in the media.
I've said that I think it's not choice, and you have a right to think it's choice. You have accused the western media of white-washing.

I have just stated my belief, like you've stated your belief.

No man. This is not a belief. Dropping an Apple to the floor, and expecting it to hit the floor, is not a belief. It is a fact.
We are here discussing a scientific method to determine if one is born Gay. We are not discussing religion. We are discussing Science. Not beliefs.

I once again call you up on it. You say that you are not gay. therefore you are attracted to women. What is it about them that attracts you?

OK. Cool. Now it is interesting. Now you are making sense. You are talking about a man who is born with a sexual desire for another man. This is not specific to one Man. Because just like the rest of us who find many women to be attractive so he too will find many men to be attractive.

So, we need data for this. Right? We can no longer speculate. We need science. I gave half of the picture in my sex test. The other half is the attraction to men. There is something called the Kinsey scale. I know a bit from trailers.

I think we need to update this for the age of porno, big data and fMRI. So to fix the picture, we would also have porno men with full erections, asking questions. But in this case you would excuse the straight man from spending no more than a few minutes looking at shit.

But seriously this is the whole point of the thread. The scientific method to determine if someone is Born Gay. Or if it is a choice. This test can be performed in many universities in both California and France who are centres for world wide porno industry.

I don't think you know much about sexuality at all.

In fact, some Lesbians are aroused by watching male-male pornography. Does that mean that they are attracted to men? Nope it sure doesn't.

__________________
"It is essential that there should be organization of labor. This is an era of organization. Capital organizes and therefore labor must organize."
Theodore Roosevelt

OK. Cool. Now it is interesting. Now you are making sense. You are talking about a man who is born with a sexual desire for another man. This is not specific to one Man. Because just like the rest of us who find many women to be attractive so he too will find many men to be attractive.

So, we need data for this. Right? We can no longer speculate. We need science. I gave half of the picture in my sex test. The other half is the attraction to men. There is something called the Kinsey scale. I know a bit from trailers.

I think we need to update this for the age of porno, big data and fMRI. So to fix the picture, we would also have porno men with full erections, asking questions. But in this case you would excuse the straight man from spending no more than a few minutes looking at shit.

But seriously this is the whole point of the thread. The scientific method to determine if someone is Born Gay. Or if it is a choice. This test can be performed in many universities in both California and France who are centres for world wide porno industry.

Ok. But I fail to see the point of putting together such an elaborate, expensive, (and kinda freaky) experiment.

If, for the sake of argument, we assume a binary division into those men who feel sexually attracted to women and those men who feel sexually attracted to men, what possible reason is there to even suspect that anyone consciously chooses which group to fall into?

All my personal experience with attraction and all my conversation with others on that topic universally confirms that no one just 'decides' who they will be attracted to. Does your experience differ? Did you just decide who you would be sexually attracted to and who you wouldn't?

Put another way, since (for a variety of reasons) none of us are actually going to do an experiment like the kind you suggest, doesn't it make the most sense to presume that homosexual orientation, like all other sexual orientations, is not consciously chosen by the individual?