Gregory Woodhouse writes:
> Maybe it's possible to create a curried version of a
> function taking a variable number of arguments, but I'm not sure how
> it would be done.
I don't think it makes sense to "fully" curry a varargs procedure.
Which of these should return numbers, and which should return procedures?
(curry +)
((curry +) 1)
(((curry +) 1) 2)
((((curry +) 1) 2) 3)
--dougorleans at gmail.com