Local elections were held in Croatia on May 21st. This was the first time since the 1990 that the radical left has made significant gains, which is especially encouraging in light of the probable parliamentary snap elections in September.

In the capital of Zagreb, the wide left front (consisting of five, mostly new or newish, parties – ranging from left liberals to anti-capitalists) got 7,64% in the elections for the city council (around 24.000 votes). In lower levels of local government, the left front “Zagreb je nas” had even better results – close to 30% in some cases.

The explicitly anti-capitalist Workers’ Front party got one city council member in Zagreb – which is the first such case since the introduction of multiparty elections in 1990. The Workers’ Front also gained 3 representatives in city district councils and 12 representatives in local councils in Zagreb, which is also a huge advance for an upstart radical left party.

Outside of Zagreb, the anti-capitalist WF did not pass the electoral threshold of 5% but has made significant gains nonetheless, which may be crucial in the upcoming parliamentary election. In the coast town of Pula, the 8th largest city in Croatia the Workers’ Front mayor candidate got 4,21% (the list for the city council got 3,83%, the list for the whole region of Istria, including the rural areas, 1,99%). In Samobor, a smaller town close to the capital of Zagreb, the Workers’ Front mayor candidate got 3,12% (the list for the city council 2,39%).

In the second largest town in Croatia, Split, the coalition of the Workers’ front with a left liberal/social democratic party got 4,36%, staying just a couple of hundred votes from the 5% threshold for the city council.

These results may not seem spectacular, but they’re the highest results the radical left has won electorally in the 27 years of post-socialist Croatia and they indicate a strong tendency in the rise of the left vote – and a good sign for the upcoming parliamentary elections.

Breaking news!

A court announced the verdict in the May 2 case, known as Odessa massacre. The winners of political conflict accused their political opponents, supporters of federalization. The court decision says of federalists: "There is not a single piece of evidence to support the prosecution. Moreover, the prosecution did not even try to prove the guilt."
The court acquitted the accused due to the lack of evidence of the charges and decided to release them in the courtroom. However, the triumph of justice lasted no more than three minutes. Two federalists were arrested again on the other accusation.

There was and still is a kind of unspoken racism that was inherent in the west’s coverage of The Odessa Massacre. Had the events happened in the Arab world and under an ISIS flag, things would have doubtlessly got more coverage. But because the victims were ethnic and cultural Russians, things were interpreted through the prism of two paradoxical but equally potent forms of racism.

A months-long investigation which tracked and exposed a massive covert weapons shipment network to terror groups in Syria via diplomatic flights originating in the Caucuses and Eastern Europe under the watch of the CIA and other intelligence agencies has resulted in the interrogation and firing of the Bulgarian journalist who first broke the story.

On May 9, Ukraine traditionally celebrates the day of victory in the Great Patriotic War. However, the fascists, who came to power, are trying to ban this holiday. It resulted in numerous clashes and arrests. Celebration demonstrated the battle for historical memory in Ukraine has not ended on May 9. It continues and will continue until the overthrow of the Kiev regime.

Around 580,000 respondents in 35 countries were asked the question: Would you actively participate in large-scale uprising against the generation in power if it happened in the next days or months? More than half of 18- to 34-year-olds said yes.