Would This Be Wrong?

The girl tells the guy she loves him and wants to be his girlfriend. So he says:

"Okay, but these are the rules:

"#1: You are NOT the boss of me.

"#2. Do not try to manipulate me or control me. Do not make demands of me.

"#3 Allow me to be myself and let me express myself in my own way.

"If you can follow these rules, I'll follow the same ones for you and return the favor. What's fair is fair. If you can not follow any ONE of these
rules, then I want nothing to do with you, regardless of how I may feel."

Because, many women think that the guy has to obey their every whim and that they are the boss of the guy.

Here's an example of why these rules could be important.. I had a friend with a girlfriend who hated his jacket. She absolutely demanded that he get
rid of that jacket to please her. She raised a big ruckus and insulted and berated him all to hell and back until he finally relented and let her
choose the jacket she wanted him to wear.

Finally the day came where she wore a pornographic shirt. Well, very close to being a pornographic shirt anyway. He said it was inappropriate to wear
because it was just an offensive shirt. It had a muscle guy in a g-string in front of a Confederate flag showing off his muscle. He demanded that she
got rid of it, she refused and started insulting him and berating him all to hell and back. As in "how DARE you demand I get rid of this shirt. I
have every right in the world to wear this shirt you stupid sob..." yadda yadda yadda,,,

Eventually they broke up because she demanded that he be his boss and dominated and controlled every aspect of his life while she wouldn't give him
anything in return.

Unfortunately, there are far too many women like that in this day and age. It seems to me that many women can not be respectful towards men and are
quite irrational about it.

So that's where these rules come into play.

Because it seems to me that a healthy relationship borders on two-way respect, and a woman would respect the guy in this manner.

I'm not trying to say she should be a slave to him and his desires so please don't take it as such. It's just that to me a respectful person would
allow their significant other these things, and the partner would return the favor. Respect and trust is what builds a relationship, not domination,
control, and "do as I say not as I do" junk.

And there are a lot of women out there, as well as men, who don't seem to understand these things.

And personally, I just don't understand why some people have to be this way.

I think it's good to set up boundaries, healthy even but I wouldn't call them rules. Also as hard as it is, it's unfair to assume that this woman
is like the woman you wrote of. I'm not sure that laying out boundaries before the first date is necessary or prudent. Perhaps as the relationship
begins to become serious you could both sit down and talk about expectations, both yours AND hers.

If someone loves you they would not ask those things of you. They like who you are and wouldn't want you to change. That goes both ways. If your
with someone and you want them to change in some way, your with the wrong person and it will always end badly. If you meet someone you really want to
be with because you love who they are there is no need for those rules. You will understand that if you meet someone that you truely love for who
they are one day.

Too many women make it about the prize between the thighs, cheese between the knees, whatever you want to call it. Maybe that's just my opinion cause
I been trampin this desert for more than a few months, guys got to have some standards.

I think guys wear a lot of really ugly clothes sometimes and most men would wear the same clothes they wore in high school for the rest of their life
if their wives/girlfriends didn't make them buy new things.

I agree in equality, but for real, most guys need help with their wardrobe and will never understand why a woman wears anything but lingerie. Sorry,
but true.

Anyways, to add, mutual love and respect mean you never have to set rules. Deal with issues as they arrive and always respect each other's right to be
their own person.

This is getting off topic but don't men have a right to wear what they want to wear? My Husband has an ugly pair of plaid shorts that I think are
hideous but he likes them so I don't say anything. Conversely I'm sure on my "fat days" when I wear sweat pants and a huge t shirt he would rather
me wearing my skinny jeans and a halter but he has the sense to leave it.

Oh, yeah they still do. My husband was still wearing his juniour high clothes when we met. Some things had to go (the tye-dye and courdoroys) but his
favourite stuff I actually sewed up when the seams got holes.

The point is, most guys just don't care and really aren't expected to.
You could call it a labour of love, making things easy for those guys who hate shopping.

Originally posted by smilesmcgee
I think guys wear a lot of really ugly clothes sometimes and most men would wear the same clothes they wore in high school for the rest of their life
if their wives/girlfriends didn't make them buy new things.

I agree in equality, but for real, most guys need help with their wardrobe and will never understand why a woman wears anything but lingerie. Sorry,
but true.

Anyways, to add, mutual love and respect mean you never have to set rules. Deal with issues as they arrive and always respect each other's right to
be their own person.

edit on 18-9-2012 by smilesmcgee because: (no reason given)

You don't know how wrong you are! That is an extremely sexist thing to say and I just want you to know I am horribly offended. There is no way I
would wear the same clothes I wore in high school. They simply wouldn't fit any more. There's no way I could, it's physically impossible. AND
not all guys will never understand why women don't wear anything but lingerie. Some of us wonder why they just don't go around stark naked all the
time.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.