I would think you'd share my concern with out hosr, Squiggles. I'm pretty sure Lilley knows just how stupid this argument is: however, CS, by his tone appears to actually believe his own interpretation.

However, only CS can clarify that.

Scenty, we care deeply about your mental well-being. Please reassure us that you understand this is only what those fancy university types call a "metaphor".

Myself? I warned the Left that "Two Can Play This Game", and that unless the Left stopped its disinformation agenda, I'd counter them with generous helpings of their own medicine. They wouldn't like it, I warned. And Terry's indignance, though barely concealed, is causing him to dig in. Attempting to suggest mental illness on my part? Oooh... not good at all, Mr. Rudden. Time to clean off the sole of your shoe... it smells like canine excrement.

Balbs-Terry is just the same old, same old. He hasn't changed in his advanced chronology. Though I fully expect him to throw age around, plus income, etc., to pretend he's superior and must therefore be right while I'm necessarily wrong... Same old, same old. We know this guy's inner cranial workings. Well-trained, well-experienced and highly aggressive ideologically. He is why we blog. He and his ilk. If there were no Fabianists to fight... we might be doing more idyllic stuff. But duty requires our labors...

Wow. Three responses, and you still haven't manage to answer the question.

So, Sentinel - do you actually believe that "this ad "accuses the Canadian Prime Minister of assassinating dissidents"?

Or do you understand that that's metaphorical?

(By the way, you seem to under the mistaken impression that I'm trying to pretend to be someone else - i.e., NOT balbulican. Balbulican IS me - Terry Rudden - and I now use the names pretty much interchangeably; unlike some bloggers, I don't inhabit a world full of scary monsters I have to hide from. :)