Hate crime is more than “anti-social behaviour”

The case of Fiona Pilkington, the 38-year old woman who killed herself and her 18-year-old disabled daughter, Frankie, after years of abuse from local youths in Leicestershire, has shocked the nation—and so naturally, once the story broke, politicians were swift to respond. The home secretary, Alan Johnson, in a speech at the Labour party conference, said that he would use the case to “force” the police to do more to tackle anti-social behaviour. Gordon Brown echoed this in his speech later the same day, assuring “the British people that between now and Christmas, neighbourhood policing will focus in a more direct and intensive way on anti-social behaviour.” Johnson also said that the case showed that tackling anti-social behaviour should be prioritised by police—as it clearly was not in this case: many of Fiona’s pleas to the police for help were not treated with the level of seriousness they deserved.

Clearly anti-social behaviour and the “respect agenda” are popular topics for politicians of all parties, and we should expect to hear more from all of them on the case.

But that’s not enough. Fiona Pilkington and her daughter were targeted, day after day, because Frankie happened to have a learning impairment. The family were taunte…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days. But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Email

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

Related articles

Comments

Stephen Brookes

September 30, 2009 at 08:24

Katherine.
This case which we all knew of as existing, has actually turned out to be far worse than we ever imagined.
It is not just about being critical of Leicestershire police, it is about a total failure of the local council, the community safety teams, any neighbourhood watch and yes of course individual police. We all share the blame!
This is the 'Stephen Lawrence' moment for disabled people. Lets make sure we learn!
Stephen Brookes.
Disability Hate Crime Network

Dr Hannah Mason-Bish

September 30, 2009 at 10:32

As an academic working on disability hate crime, I must agree with Katherine. There is a case in Kent which is on the news today, where a disabled gay couple have been forced to flee their home. Kent Police said:
"Kent Police always takes reports of anti-social behaviour seriously and will react, provide resources and tackle the problems faced by people,"
Why is it not correctly labelled as hate crime? Because the victims were disabled? A racist incident would surely have not been called anti-social behaviour. It is important because it impacts on the police response.

Stephen Tindale

September 30, 2009 at 12:48

It is predictable that politicians will use the Pilkingtons' tragedy to make broader points about anti-social behaviour. Yes, it is 'anti-social' to torment someone until she kills herself and her daughter, just as it is 'anti-social' to murder someone. But politicians must be acknowledge the fact that the Pilkingtons were targeted because of mental health problems, so that this was a disability hate crime. A Mind study found that mentally ill people are eleven times more likely to suffer abuse and harassment than non-disabled people. Politicians can and should put pressure on the police and CPS to charge more people with disability hate crimes. They should also do all they can to help end the stigma still associated with mental illness.

Dave McQuirk

October 1, 2009 at 11:17

While this does have the potential to be 'our' Lawrence moment, I'm truly sceptical that it will. Not one commentator, either politician or broadcaster/journalist in the mainstream media has linked this to hate crime and it will be subsumed in the 'broken Britian' war of words that will accelerate as the next election draws nigh.
Until the life of a disabled person is seen as valid and valuable as that of a non-disabled person by the wider society, this will not change. The use of disabled people as the targts of jokes and ridicule in the media in ways that would never be premitted regarding other minorities and the lack of concern of the regulators only serves to perpetuate this.

Anne Novis UKDPC

October 1, 2009 at 14:22

I was involved in producing the 'Getting Away with Murder report' representing UKDPC. I have tried to raise awareness of Disability Hate crime for over fifteen years.
I have been attacked several times as a wheelchair user, told I should have been killed at birth and as I was not should be killed now, threatened, abused, harrassed. I have worked hard to get the police in London and natioanally more aware and active on this issue.
We see little initiatives here and there by police but this is no way good enough. So many disabled people are victims of hate crime, domestic violence and abuse yet most our stories do not get in the headlines and very little, if any, response from this government.
How many more deaths does there have to be? one? ten? fifty?
When will we be believed?
When will we get justice?
When will we get eqaulity?
Untill we get prompt responses to this issue we will always be a target as most perpetuators get away with it, if sentanced they get less time for murdering a disabled person then they do for a non disabled person.
This country and its justice system and all the police services need to ask themselves some very hard questions about the underlying discriminatory beliefs and attitudes towards disabled people that leads to them not giving us the justice we deserve and rightly expect.
We are not second class human beings whose life experiences can be disregarded and ignored as though we are of little importance and an irratant to society at large.
Passive acceptance of second class service provision around justice for disabled people is intolerable and unacceptable.
I for one, and UKDPC, will not stand by without challenging everyone in this country about the way we are treated, not believed, and murdered just because we are disabled people.
This is a human rights issue and one that a country like the UK should have been adresssing many years ago.
Now I ask, claim the right to equal justice and legislation that recognises the experiences of Hate Crime we experience.
It is not 'social misbehaviour'it is a crime!

Toby

October 2, 2009 at 00:57

It's crime, pure and simple, not "hate crime", which is a bogus leftist political project to privilege certain groups. The "hate crime" boondoggle is harmful to the "victims", as well as to the non-disabled, non-black, non-gay middle class people who are also the victims of crime (it does employ a whole load of Islington luvvies at universities and community organising groups though). This wave of crime in England is the direct result of PC pandering which means that police spend more time filling in forms about how homophobic they are and arresting students for calling a horse "gay" than actually going out on the beat. If they did go out on the beat and had stopped these evil youths from standing outside this poor lady's house, the "human rights" bandwagon would be suing them before they got back to the station.

Dave McQuirk

October 5, 2009 at 16:11

@ Toby
Hate crime exisits because the crime is specifically focused on one aspect of the victim. Alledging that some 'PC gone mad' element is why this crime is higher now than ever before is just nonsense. I got just as much abuse and as many threats because of my disability under the last Tory Govt as I do now under Labour.
I'd bet good money that most non-disabled, non-black, non-gay middle class people don't get anywhere near the amount of directed abuse on a daily basis as disabled people do.
If, as you say, this is a project to privilege certain groups, you've got nothing to lose by becoming diasbled and seeing just how privileged we are.

OJ

October 5, 2009 at 18:00

@ Dave
Toby's point is not denying that disabled people suffer more abuse than able bodied people (though in my closeted naivety i have to admit to being shocked at the apparent scale of it) but that giving it a label of “hate” crime changes nothing. It’s a crime. Equally I’ve never understood why a racially motivated crime is any worse than the same crime with no racist motive: why is beating somebody up because they are black or in a wheelchair worse than beating up someone who is neither?

Dave McQuirk

October 6, 2009 at 13:51

@OJ
The same could be said about killing a child compared with an adult but society deems this a more 'serious' crime. Murder is murder regardless of the victim?
Surely the aim of any just society is to reduce the persecution of the most disproportionately persecuted individuals? Using the term 'hate crime' is one tool in addressing this. Whilst the impact of an individual crime on a specific individual is roughly equal regardless of the circumstances of that individual (ignoring issues like insurance, support networks and the resources to overcome the crime), some groups of people experience more crime than others purely because of some unaltererable thing about them. Because of where I live and my house, my chances of being burgled are the same as my neighbours regardless of their ability or disability, however if we were out on a Saturday, my chances of being abused or threatened are much higher than theirs. So far, the desingator of hate crime seems to be the best tool for recording and addressing this. I've yet to hear any other suggestions from the "crime is just crime" lobby that address this point.

travel pillow

October 14, 2009 at 07:59

What a good idea! But then that means going back to Common Sense policing principles when police were police and not Nulabour Social Workers.
Rowing back from the mess of the ill conceived social engineering of the last 20 years will be heavy going. In what should become a memorable phrase, said we should stop treating adults like children and children like adults – but how to begin unpicking the nonsense and wrong headed ideology that now ensnares and neuters us in everything we do is hard to see.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Timothy Garton Ash says Britain could pull back from the Brexit brink and lead EU reform from within. David Allen Green says that if we must leave, there is a better way to do it. Plus: a new exhibition punctures the clichés around Islamic art

Sponsored features

Prospect was originally founded by Editor David Goodhart and Publisher Derek Coombs, as a home for intelligent debate. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. The aim is to tackle the big challenges confronting society, through rigorous thinking and fine writing.

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days.. PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.