BACK in July last year in a boardroom of a western Australian free-market think tank, the extrovert British climate change sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton was holding court.

The topic for discussion? How to better capture the Australian media to help push a right wing, free-market and climate sceptic agenda. At the time, Lord Monckton was in Australia at the behest of a mining association and Gina Rinehart to deliver a series of talks on climate change and spread his conspiracy theories that human-caused climate change is a left-wing plot to bring down the West.

At one point during the tour, Monckton told a boisterous partisan crowd: “So to the bogus scientists who have produced the bogus science that invented this bogus scare I say, we are coming after you. We are going to prosecute you, and we are going to lock you up.”

Lord Monckton had been invited to Australia by the iron and coal mining boss Rinehart, the country’s richest woman with a rising personal fortune in the region of $20 billion.

Hosting the meeting was the Mannkal Economic Education Foundation, a group chaired by mining “Hall of Fame” member Ron Manners to promote free-market ideals and low government intervention.

Manners is also a member of Gina Rinehart’s lobby group ANDEV, which has been joined by the Institute for Public Affairs to lobby for a separate low-tax low regulation economic zone for the north of Australia to make mining projects easier to develop.

It would be safe to presume, given Manner’s background in mining and the make-up of his staff, that this aim to lower government intervention would include any regulations and taxes on mining.

The Lord Monckton gathering, posted on YouTube [see below], had all the air of a strategy meeting. ***SEEUPDATEBELOW***

“Is there an Australian version of Fox News?… No,” Monckton told the gathered group, which included Manners himself.

“Frankly whatever you do at a street level – which is what you are talking about here – is not going to have much of an impact compared with capturing an entire news media.

“You look at the impact that Andrew Bolt has had since he was rocketed to fame and – without giving away too many secrets – Joanne [climate sceptic Jo Nova] is going to end up doing quite a bit more on that channel if all goes according to plan.”

In a second YouTube video, sceptic blogger Jo Nova is heard talking about her own work as the group discuss a way to create an improved echo chamber of online climate sceptic blogs. Another guest, writer and blogger Rafe Champion, describes socialising with Tim Blair, another climate sceptic blogger who works for the same Murdoch-owned News Ltd stable as popular sceptic blogger and commentator Andrew Bolt. Champion also blogs and promotes climate sceptic views at the centre-right, libertarian blog Catallaxy Files.

Just a few months after this meeting, Gina Rinehart finally secured herself a seat on the board of Channel Ten after buying up shares the previous year. Just before that meeting, right-wing blogger and Andrew Bolt was given his own show The Bolt Report on which to promote his climate “sceptic” agenda.

Rinehart is not averse to overt climate science denial herself, writing in a mining publication last year that she had “never met a geologist or leading scientist who believes adding more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere will have any significant effect on climate change, especially not from a relatively small country like Australia.”

Last night, it emerged that Rinehart had made a $192 million purchase of shares in Fairfax Media Ltd, giving her a 9.9 per cent stake.

Fairfax owns leading print and online newspapers the Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the Brisbane Times (which I have worked for on a freelance basis), a suite of regional rural newspapers and popular city-based radio stations including 4BC, 4BH and 2UE and 3AW.

Commentators on the ABCare already indicating that Rinehart is looking to increase her influence on the public discourse through her media interests.

Back in the Mannkal boardroom, Monckton told the group that Australia needed to emulate the Fox news model from the United States and should target the “super rich” for some investment.

He also discusses working with Nova, a staunch climate sceptic blogger, and Andrew Bolt to “put together a business plan”.

“That is the way to do it,” Monckton continued. “You have to capture the high ground on what are still the major media and I think will remain so for some time and until we crack that one both in the UK and Australia, we are going to suffer from a disadvantage over and against the more libertarian-minded right-thinking people in the US who have got Fox News and therefore have got things like the Tea Party movement and therefore have at last put some lead into the pencil of the Republican party.”

“If you look at Glenn Beck, for instance, who has been explaining how the US constitution works - an essentially libertarian democratic document - you have the business people explaining how free-market concept in business works every day and reaching thousands of millions of people around the world.

“It seems to me that devoting some time and effort to encouraging those that we know who are super-rich to invest in perhaps even establishing a new satellite news channel – not an expensive thing to do – and getting a few Jo Novas and Andrew Bolts to go on and commentate – but keep the news fair, straight and balanced as they do on Fox.”

“That,” Monckton said to an approving board room, would “break through and give to Australia a proper dose of free market thinking”.

Whether or not Australia is about to get a further dose of free market climate denial through the outlets of Fairfax is now open to question.

UPDATE: The original YouTube versions of the video footage were removed from YouTube by the user. DeSmogBlog has located the videos elsewhere on YouTube (same user) and reposted them above. Below is a video from GetUp that includes the original footage with transcript added in:

Previous Comments

This is really perfidous. The Sydney Morning Herald has some of the best climate change reporting out there. I even have a permanent link to it on my blog. This reminds me of the Wall Street Journal blog “Environmental Capital,” which was one of the few places a person could get decent information on renewable energy investments. It was so good that Murdoch got rid of it.

Monckton says “the more libertarian-minded right-thinking people in the US who have got Fox News and therefore have got things like the Tea Party movement” Hold on a moment. I thought the Tea Party was supposed to be a grassroots movement,now the noble lord is saying its all been got up by a corporate interest.

It’s obvious that the right wing t.v show the Bolt report is propped up by Rhinehart & she probably pays for it to stay on the air, when ratings would dictate that it would normally be removed after 2 or 3 shows. The show has virtually no balanced opinion whatsoever & pretty much features only guest appearances from the conservative party & right wing lobbyists.

Its sad that in the USA& Australia, so much oxygen is being given to such extreme views & media personalities & even worse, that there are people out there gullible enough to goop it up. Monckton obviously realises that there is little chance of him getting a Fox news type program in his own country, so like some travelling Musolini, goes where there is the most fertile ground for his extremist views. This Rhinehart acquisition of fairfax shares is a real worry & will no doubt lead to something similar to the Bolt report in the fairfax press, or a dilution of pro science views, to be replaced by corporate views.

No doubt Rhinehart seeing the carbon tax coming & the super profit resource tax coming, she wants to head them off before they bear too much fruit. Fruit that the Australian public will find hard to give up ( an extra 4% super for employees & generous tax cuts for small business).

She didnt bother with the Murdoch press, as it is already running a successful propaganda campaign where many states & towns dont have any choice but to get Murdochs corporate & partisan views. She knew that Fairfax while its radio talk back shows were nearly all right wing, provided the only paper that didnt tow the corporate view.

“Its sad that in the USA& Australia, so much oxygen is being given to such extreme views & media personalities & even worse, that there are people out there gullible enough to goop it up.”

There is plenty of room for discussion after the facts about Climate Change are accepted. I really detest the attacks on Science. Its not like these buffoons are wondering around challenging Fowler Nordheim Field Migration. But they use it every day, and it affects their bottom line.

After the fact we can talk about all kinds of things that are far more relevant;

Do we really care about the third world? They take the brunt of it, and it’s not like we care now.

Can our children live in the future world we plan to leave for them, and do we care?

If we want to adapt (first world) lets take a hard look at it, how hard is it, how much will it cost?

If we want to shift from fossil fuels, what do we need to do to make it happen, what are the far reaching impacts.

I’m sure their more to discuss.

But all these discussions being jammed by the attack on science. They all demand and require the use of Peer Reviewed science to make their day to day operations run, but they just don’t like this rather inconvenient kind of science.

getting a few Jo Novas and Andrew Bolts to go on and commentate – but keep the news fair, straight and balanced as they do on Fox

So, let’s see: Jo Nova, Andrew Bolt and Fox News are fair, straight and balanced? When did that start happening? We sure could use some fair, straight and balanced news reporting from the MSM, but these days MSM stands for Murdoch Spruiking Monckton.

It is a good thing we in Oz still have the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (our government run ABC) and it is not in danger of being absorbed by the cancer of radical right-wing disinformers like Limited News. Without ABC and the internet, I would have no ‘fair, straight and balanced’ sources of information.

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Keep In Touch

Representatives from 30 European cities got together in Paris last week to formally commit themselves to reducing greenhouse gas emissions no less than 40% by 2030 — the same target set by the European Union’s climate change roadmap — and to call attention to the role major urban centers can play in combating global warming.