Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Brandon Stanton's "Humans of New York"

"Humans of New York," Brandon Stanton, All rights reservedJust a week after its publication, Brandon Stanton’s photo
book, Humans of New York, jumped to
number one on the Times best-seller
list. To make the book, Stanton walked all five boroughs (but mostly Manhattan)
with his camera, approached people he found interesting, started up conversations
and asked to take their pictures. Not only did the people agree, they opened up
for surprisingly unguarded portraits; many also gave Stanton intimate quotes for
attribution, as though he was a trusted friend.

Does this sound like a classic New York artist’s fairy tale?
Well, it is. And here comes its
modern twist: Stanton was not discovered by a John Szarkowski-style prince of
taste but by millions of viewers on the internet. To become the people’s choice
Stanton began showing his pictures on photoblogs and social media in 2010. The last time I visited his “Humans of
New York” (HONY) page on Facebook, it had been “liked” by 1,772,196 visitors,
and each of the page’s hundreds of pictures had themselves inspired hundreds or
thousands of comments.

These are astonishing numbers. What makes the pictures so
popular? Certainly, Stanton’s well-made color portraits are uniformly pleasing.
Straightforward and unfussy, they fill out a New York City “gorgeous mosaic” of
demographic diversity with an eye for individual style and a flair for tripping
the shutter at the perfect moment. Perhaps Stanton’s real gift, in fact, is his
ability to create that moment – to persuade strangers to feel good about him,
his project and ultimately themselves.

In addition, Stanton is a sympathetic interviewer. As he shoots, he asks big questions, such as “What is your biggest struggle?” The answers range from ironic (often very funny) quips to true attempts at self-revelation. Later, Stanton combines his subjects’ edited answers with their pictures to create funny, swoony or sad little stories.

"Humans of New York," Brandon Stanton, All rights reserved

On a rainy street, for instance, he asks a mysteriously smiling
young woman, “What was the happiest moment of your life?” The woman replies:
“There are two. The day my baby was born, and last night.” Responding to
another question, an elegant old woman in a fur hat looks proudly at the lens and says, “When my husband was
dying, I said, ‘Moe, how am I supposed to live without you?’ He told me, ’Take
the love and spread it around.’ “I’m told this collection moves many viewers to tears. I’m guessing most of these are what
people call ‘happy’ tears. Most viewers – like most of the people photographed --
seem helpless against Stanton’s optimistic charm and genuine affection. In this book, buoyed up by his eager
energy, dancers dance, lovers kiss and old grumps laugh aloud. For a moment this friendly young man seems
able to create an experience of deeply-felt community. His style, it seems to me, embodies our cultural moment’s ideal template for photographic portraiture.
Everything is in the open. No pictures are taken without full permission.
Editing and usage rights are theoretically collaborative. Recorded words are
reliably accurate and respect the true context in which they were spoken. The final
photographs represent a synergy of shooter and subject. Posted to the internet,
they become a kind of collective. I’m guessing that most of Stanton’s subjects felt they were posing
under just such an unwritten moral contract (legal realities may be different).
No doubt they felt good about it. Stanton’s wide-open, democratic style is the
flip side, after all, of the rampant insecurity and paranoia that curls more
and more insistently through our high-tech society – and often surfaces around
photography. “That man with the camera,” we fret. “Is he pointing it at us? Is he the government, a stalker, a
pervert? Is he looking at the kids?” Such fears may be extreme, but they’re not
contemptible. There’s a reason for them to exist.

"Humans of New York," Brandon Stanton, All rights reserved

Nevertheless, as a critic, I’m concerned about this trend. If photographers and their intentions are
forced to endure such fear-driven vetting, will only feel-good,
we-did-this-together projects like Stanton’s be able to thrive? I say this as a
sincere fan of “Humans of New York.”
I admire its steady, non-judgmental acceptance of its subjects’ offerings. But
I worry about photographers who use very different methods and mine very
different veins.

"Lower East Side Children," Helen Levitt, All rights reserved

Take Helen Levitt, who died a few years ago. Regularly
described as “shy and retiring,” she walked the streets of Harlem and the Lower
East Side anonymously for 60 years, photographing and filming people -- most
often, children – using cameras fitted with a right angle viewer, called a
‘Winkelsucher,’ that allowed Levitt to stand sideways to her actual subjects.
In other words, she snuck shots in pursuit of what legendary author James Agee
called “…a fleeting and half-secret world… most abundant in lyrical qualities.”

"Girl at Window," Helen Levitt, All rights reserved

Levitt’s colleague and friend Walker Evans did something
similar in his famous subway series, “Many Are Called.” With Levitt often sitting
by his side, Evans rode the New York trains for weeks making exposures with a
tiny camera through the buttonhole of his overcoat. Riders among the daily mass migration rarely noticed, but there
was nothing dishonest about the pictures. Looked at now, Evan’s pictures, like
Levitt’s, are a triumph of humanist affirmation.

"Many Are Called," Walker Evans, All rights reserved

Does “Humans…” give us a truer look at New Yorkers than the
street portraits of the past or today's by other photographers?
I’d say it gives us another kind of look – a familiar modern look,
balanced on the tightrope between disguise and revelation. Call it a social
media look. My recommendation is:
If you can’t afford the book, at least check out the website
(humansofnewyork.com). It may be the first big mainstream collection that takes
for granted the facebook selves – at once pleading and performative – that we willingly
reveal to our linked-up world.

Loved this Tim, found it on twitter. And I share your concerns! I actually try to have an "antennae" for overly-manufactured responses, which I choose not to share on the blog. I'm definitely a little bound in my honesty by the need to be respectful and kind, but honesty and authenticity is an ideal I strive for. And while I may sometimes fail, I am sensitive to how the nature of a "collaborative" project, as you describe it, could undermine this authenticity. Anyway, very thoughtful piece!

Brandon, Thanks for your response. It's a first for me to have the subject of a review get in touch. I'm glad you liked the piece. And I'm glad you understand that it wasn't criticism of your way of working, which I admire. It's something going on in the culture & I don't even pretend to understand it. A kind of fear about anything that isn't right out there for everybody to see & touch & examine. A fear of shyness or introversion maybe. Just a hunch really. I probably think too much about such things. Anyway, thanks again for your comments & your photographs. Keep going. They're terrific.

I enjoyed reading this. You managed to praise the work, and it’s brilliant work, while raising an interesting concern that doesn’t undermine the work at all. Thanks for a good, thought-provoking piece.