MMORPG.com Discussion Forums

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

So It's time for me to build a new PC and I'm trying to challenge myself. To that end I've set the budget at $300. Monitor, keyboard and mouse are not included in the price because I already have all of those things. I'm also not factoring in the case or power supply since I'm just planning on gutting an old donor computer. Most older, off the shelf machines have and ATX form factor and a 400W power supply, so why pay top dollar for something I get by combing yard sales and dumpster diving for.

The first step is to choose a game to build for. I'm kind of thinking about using the recommended set-up for Hard Reset, The Witcher 2, Rage, or Battlefield 3. I want one set up that will potential run them all at medium settings. Since none of these games need more than 4 Gigs of Ram I'll probably just drop $30 for 4 Gigs of DDR3 at the highest speed that the motherboard would support, and I'll probably spend an extra $30 on an AMD CPU like the Athlon II x4. The only real question left is the graphics card(s).

Do I just get something like a Geforce 9800 or Radeon 5570? Or do I go for two cheap Radeon 4850s with Crossfire? SLI is out of the question since 1) there aren't that many SLI motherboards out there and 2) SLI motherboards cost way more than Crossfire X motherboards.

Maybe you guys could come up with something better on that budget. . . .

Report this post

That leaves you ... about $150 for a video card. That puts you in the ATI 6770/6850 area, and the nVidia 550 - maybe 560 region. The 6850 or 560 would be your best options, whichever you could get to squeeze into that budget, although for the 560 you'd probably be relying on rebates and/or sales to get it in there.

You will have the capacity to upgrade the CPU all the way to the latest Zambezi when it ships, that's your biggest bottleneck with this suggestion, and that will significantly help the computer. The Athlon II or Phenom II will run stuff, but you will be able to measure (and in some cases notice) the bottleneck they provide, even with a $150 video card.

I don't know what 400W power supply your using, that's a big question mark. Your budget can't really afford anything that would significantly stress a good 400W, but a poor 400W could make this whole build just an exercise in RMAing parts over and over.

You don't want Crossfire or SLI either one. Even if you got the video cards for free, your power supply would have a hard time, your case would need to be set up for it (ventilation-wise) and you'd need a much more expensive motherboard. Plus your at the mercy of drivers to enable and optimize for the extra performance from the second GPU, and that can take weeks or months after a game ships to get.

Report this post

I actually thought about buying a $30 case and a 500W power supply (about $50), but I could just swap out the power supply in a donor case for $20.

I'm not totally strict with the $300 price. I'm willing to be within $20 over/under my budget. So a 120mm fan for cooling wouldn't be an issue unless there was no place to fit it in the case.

I'd also like to keep the CPU and the graphics cards as close as possible to eachother in price. Hell, I could buy a cheap bare bones kit and put a $60 Geforce GT 520 and call it a day. But the idea is to try and get the highest power to price ratio that I can achieve on this budget. That's why I was looking at somthing along the lines of two Radeon HD 5450s. I'm hoping that the whole would be greater than the sum of the parts.

I haven't build a rig since 2007, so I'm a little lost. I'm pretty sure that I can put an Socket AM3 CPU in an AM3+, but I'm not sure I have to go there since I've seen the AMD Phenom II X6 is an AM3. Being able to upgrade and expand this thing is key. I want something that I can build cheap, and improve over time.

I've been eyeballing that graphics card quite a bit to be honest. I've also been wondering if I should just buy a decent used Dual Core computer for $100 and then just plug a $200 GeForce GTX 560 into it. I can't really do that with a bare bones kit because I end up going way over budget when I do that.

I'm canabalizing my old DVD burner, but I really don't see the point. Most of the games I get anymore are over Steam or GoG.com. Even the stuff that isn't available on Steam is available for download somewhere else.

The OS isn't a problem at this point because I'll be starting on Windows XP Home Edition, which you can download for free. I figure next month I'll have enough to pick up Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit OEM for $100. Hence the 4 Gigs of memory instead of the 2 Gig maximum that XP can handle.

For right now, this is kind of a proof of concept project. Once I've proven that you CAN make a decent gaming rig for a little more than a console, I'll be ramping this thing up into the $500-$700 performance range.

The only problem is with the graphics card here. It's basically the same card that was in my old laptop and that thing could run Crysis at 45fps on medium settings. I have another $20 to play with here and I'm kind of wondering if it would be worth it to go with a GT 220 or even GT 520 with 1GB.

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

Originally posted by Jimmy_ScytheI haven't build a rig since 2007, so I'm a little lost. I'm pretty sure that I can put an Socket AM3 CPU in an AM3+, but I'm not sure I have to go there since I've seen the AMD Phenom II X6 is an AM3. Being able to upgrade and expand this thing is key. I want something that I can build cheap, and improve over time.

You can put an AM3 CPU in an AM3+ motherboard, but you can't put an AM3+ CPU in an AM3 motherboard.

So yes, the Phenom II X6 is AM3, and it would work in either motherboard, but the new Zambezi CPU's that are coming out now are AM3+, and there is a good chance the next generation of AMD CPU's will also use AM3+, and those won't work in an older AM3 motherboard (such as the one you have picked out).

The upgrade from AM3 to AM3+ would be a worthwhile investment of your $20. However, I think you will be disappointed with either nVidia 220 or 520 cards.

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

Originally posted by Ridelynn

Originally posted by Jimmy_Scythe
I haven't build a rig since 2007, so I'm a little lost. I'm pretty sure that I can put an Socket AM3 CPU in an AM3+, but I'm not sure I have to go there since I've seen the AMD Phenom II X6 is an AM3. Being able to upgrade and expand this thing is key. I want something that I can build cheap, and improve over time.

You can put an AM3 CPU in an AM3+ motherboard, but you can't put an AM3+ CPU in an AM3 motherboard.

So yes, the Phenom II X6 is AM3, and it would work in either motherboard, but the new Zambezi CPU's that are coming out now are AM3+, and there is a good chance the next generation of AMD CPU's will also use AM3+, and those won't work in an older AM3 motherboard (such as the one you have picked out).

The upgrade from AM3 to AM3+ would be a worthwhile investment of your $20. However, I think you will be disappointed with either nVidia 220 or 520 cards.

My other plan was to buy a barebone kit and stick a GTX 550 Ti in it. I would go a little over budget, but it seems like nVidia cardd have to have a -50 on them to be suitable for gaming while the Radeon cards have to have a --70 in the number. Not sure if that's the way that the two companies denote gaming cards, as opposed to multimedia cards, or not.

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

Originally posted by Jimmy_Scythe

Originally posted by Ridelynn

Originally posted by Jimmy_Scythe
I haven't build a rig since 2007, so I'm a little lost. I'm pretty sure that I can put an Socket AM3 CPU in an AM3+, but I'm not sure I have to go there since I've seen the AMD Phenom II X6 is an AM3. Being able to upgrade and expand this thing is key. I want something that I can build cheap, and improve over time.

You can put an AM3 CPU in an AM3+ motherboard, but you can't put an AM3+ CPU in an AM3 motherboard.

So yes, the Phenom II X6 is AM3, and it would work in either motherboard, but the new Zambezi CPU's that are coming out now are AM3+, and there is a good chance the next generation of AMD CPU's will also use AM3+, and those won't work in an older AM3 motherboard (such as the one you have picked out).

The upgrade from AM3 to AM3+ would be a worthwhile investment of your $20. However, I think you will be disappointed with either nVidia 220 or 520 cards.

My other plan was to buy a barebone kit and stick a GTX 550 Ti in it. I would go a little over budget, but it seems like nVidia cardd have to have a -50 on them to be suitable for gaming while the Radeon cards have to have a --70 in the number. Not sure if that's the way that the two companies denote gaming cards, as opposed to multimedia cards, or not.

Hmmm, i dont know where you came up with that idea lol but the 6850 is the one of the best "$/Power" cards on the market, and a referenced 6950 can flash to be the same as a 6970.

The only problem is with the graphics card here. It's basically the same card that was in my old laptop and that thing could run Crysis at 45fps on medium settings. I have another $20 to play with here and I'm kind of wondering if it would be worth it to go with a GT 220 or even GT 520 with 1GB.

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

I think I'm about to give this one to the console fanboys. You just can't build a decent gaming rig for the same price as a PS3. I'm sure that I could easily run Modern Warfare 2 on something along the lines of an Acer AX1420G, but you probably won't be able to run anything along the lines of Battlefield 3 on it. Oh yeah, and that machine costs MORE than a console.

After combing the internet for advice and configuring for the target games, the closest that I could get to the target budget was just under $400. And that's before installing an operating system. Here's what I've gotten so far:

And that will probably run just about anything at medium settings. The problem is that after you add the OS, Windows 7 64-bit, and a low end monitor, you go so far over budget that it just makes more sense to buy an XBox 360 or PS3 at a quarter of the price.

So can we please ditch this bullshit that PC gaming is just as affordable, or even as desireable, as console gaming? Even when I build my own rig, choosing the cheapest parts I can find, I'm unable to reach the PC gaming standard config without going over the $300 budget AND canabalizing the input and display from a previous build. If your trying to build your first PC, you're going to spend WAY more than you would on a console that you can just hook up to a TV that you already own.

I hear PC fanboys constantly talking about how you don't need a high end system for PC gaming, but they also tend to talk down to anyone that doesn't have a certian minimum system spec. Like the guy above that ejaculated about his triple monitor setup. It's velvet rope syndrome taken to a fucking obnoxious level.

Just once, I'd like to hear a PC purist admit that they were just fucking elitist. I won't ask that you admit to being groundlessly elitist, that would be to much truth for you to speak, but I would just like to hear the raw truth for a change. Behind all the insults, baiting, and bantering, it all boils down to what's under the hood more than what's on the screen. It's more about the cash you poured into the box, and less about actually playing the games.

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

Just a quick note on displays.....I play my xbox 360, and my PC on the same 32 inch TV so you can't include display in your price rant. also i do agree with some of your points, but the way you chose to state them makes it seem like this whole post was just a bait so you could bitch at people that tried to help you. I play MMO's on PC (because they don't have good ones on consoles) and all other games on my xbox. You need to calm down. Gaming isn't that serious.

This set up came to ~$321 with shipping for me. It is AMDs best APU with awesome intergrated graphics esentically giving you 4 cores + AMD Radeon HD 6550 for 139$. If there was anything I would improve on this it would be maybe a more known power supply and maybe some better RAM.

Edit: woops looks like the hard drive is IDE haha. well bump the price up another 20 or so for a low priced sata.

Report this post

Explain why you are reporting this post:(750 characters max.)

Originally posted by Jimmy_Scythe

I think I'm about to give this one to the console fanboys. You just can't build a decent gaming rig for the same price as a PS3. I'm sure that I could easily run Modern Warfare 2 on something along the lines of an Acer AX1420G, but you probably won't be able to run anything along the lines of Battlefield 3 on it. Oh yeah, and that machine costs MORE than a console.

After combing the internet for advice and configuring for the target games, the closest that I could get to the target budget was just under $400. And that's before installing an operating system. Here's what I've gotten so far:

And that will probably run just about anything at medium settings. The problem is that after you add the OS, Windows 7 64-bit, and a low end monitor, you go so far over budget that it just makes more sense to buy an XBox 360 or PS3 at a quarter of the price.

So can we please ditch this bullshit that PC gaming is just as affordable, or even as desireable, as console gaming? Even when I build my own rig, choosing the cheapest parts I can find, I'm unable to reach the PC gaming standard config without going over the $300 budget AND canabalizing the input and display from a previous build. If your trying to build your first PC, you're going to spend WAY more than you would on a console that you can just hook up to a TV that you already own.

I hear PC fanboys constantly talking about how you don't need a high end system for PC gaming, but they also tend to talk down to anyone that doesn't have a certian minimum system spec. Like the guy above that ejaculated about his triple monitor setup. It's velvet rope syndrome taken to a fucking obnoxious level.

Just once, I'd like to hear a PC purist admit that they were just fucking elitist. I won't ask that you admit to being groundlessly elitist, that would be to much truth for you to speak, but I would just like to hear the raw truth for a change. Behind all the insults, baiting, and bantering, it all boils down to what's under the hood more than what's on the screen. It's more about the cash you poured into the box, and less about actually playing the games.

Lol, random rant of the day winner.

PS. Sorry it took so long to respond, the word processor on the XBox isn't too hot

Report this post

The whole APU thing passed me by to be honest. I haven't built a rig since around 2007/2008. I'm going to google and find out what's what there.

I didn't mean to go into rant mode, but outside of this forum I've run into more fucking snobs using their rig as some kind of overcompensation for their obvious character flaws than I care count or remember. I wasn't attacking anyone here, but the more I dig into this project the more I kind of get why console players hate PC gamers. To get in the club, or stay in it in my case, you have to deal with the most insufferable assholes and douchebags this side of 4chan. It's no wonder why so many people just leave the PC to itself. PC gaming rocks, but the more vocal of PC gamers suck.

I've appreciated the help that I've gotten. And I've even met a few all around gamers like myself that really couldn't give a fuck less what a game is played on so long as the game is good. But the PC purists have got to fucking go. If we want PC gaming to grow and to thrive, we have to put this dickheads in their place. Otherwise, the community will just grow smaller and smaller until the only thing we're left with are iPhone games.

This set up came to ~$321 with shipping for me. It is AMDs best APU with awesome intergrated graphics esentically giving you 4 cores + AMD Radeon HD 6550 for 139$. If there was anything I would improve on this it would be maybe a more known power supply and maybe some better RAM.

Edit: woops looks like the hard drive is IDE haha. well bump the price up another 20 or so for a low priced sata.

Okay, now for my dumb questions. . . .

This build doesn't require a discrete graphics card?

Can I even put a discrete graphics card in this thing without disabling the graphics core?

Can I use this with a crossfire ready Radeon card?

That motherboard is awefully small, couldn't I save a little money by using a compact form factor rather than a mid tower case?

I can always shave costs by canabalizine the case and power supply off of a junker or bench beast, but your build hits the closest to the mark so far.

Report this post

The whole APU thing passed me by to be honest. I haven't built a rig since around 2007/2008. I'm going to google and find out what's what there.

I didn't mean to go into rant mode, but outside of this forum I've run into more fucking snobs using their rig as some kind of overcompensation for their obvious character flaws than I care count or remember. I wasn't attacking anyone here, but the more I dig into this project the more I kind of get why console players hate PC gamers. To get in the club, or stay in it in my case, you have to deal with the most insufferable assholes and douchebags this side of 4chan. It's no wonder why so many people just leave the PC to itself. PC gaming rocks, but the more vocal of PC gamers suck.

I've appreciated the help that I've gotten. And I've even met a few all around gamers like myself that really couldn't give a fuck less what a game is played on so long as the game is good. But the PC purists have got to fucking go. If we want PC gaming to grow and to thrive, we have to put this dickheads in their place. Otherwise, the community will just grow smaller and smaller until the only thing we're left with are iPhone games.

You are right about nerds getting elitist about computers, I always start by deciding the price I will pay, then just get the best I can for the money, if you ask for advice the graphics card alone costs more than my budget.

This set up came to ~$321 with shipping for me. It is AMDs best APU with awesome intergrated graphics esentically giving you 4 cores + AMD Radeon HD 6550 for 139$. If there was anything I would improve on this it would be maybe a more known power supply and maybe some better RAM.

Edit: woops looks like the hard drive is IDE haha. well bump the price up another 20 or so for a low priced sata.

Okay, now for my dumb questions. . . .

This build doesn't require a discrete graphics card?

Can I even put a discrete graphics card in this thing without disabling the graphics core?

Can I use this with a crossfire ready Radeon card?

That motherboard is awefully small, couldn't I save a little money by using a compact form factor rather than a mid tower case?

I can always shave costs by canabalizine the case and power supply off of a junker or bench beast, but your build hits the closest to the mark so far.

This build would not require a discrete graphics card. You can put most Radeon 6000 series graphics cards(I think the max is 6670?) into them I believe.. The APU and discrete GPU can "smart" crossfire to improve performance. Yes you could probably save money on the case, personally I have had bad experience with really cheap cases so I put the Rosewill in there because of the 2 fans and they make quality products(I even have a cheap 6 dollar gaming headset/mic from rosewill thata has lasted me 2 years now heavily gaming).