>From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au], Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 3:53 AM
>On 8/09/11 9:42 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
>> This appears to be one of the only cases for [CopyInheritedPrototype] in
>WebIDL, and if we don't want/need this to be available anywhere else, I'd
>prefer not to have to support it.
>
>Indeed. I've removed [CopyInheritedPrototype] now.
>
>Travis, I'm interpreting this as an "accept" resolution to your comment
>LC-34 (request for [CopyInheritedPrototype] use cases).
>
>Ian, I'm interpreting your original mail in this thread as a request to
>add support for the use case that [CopyInheritedPrototype] would've
>solved, which this is a rejection of.
>
>If both of you could indicate whether this is response is satisfactory,
>that would be appreciated.
This is acceptable resolution to my comment.
>Thanks,
>
>Cameron