Angered by the fact that Thad Cochran‚Äôs camp stiffed him after he helped them commit a massive voter fraud in the GOP primary, a Black Mississippi minister, the Reverend Stevie Fielder of the First Union Missionary Baptist Church, has come forward to admit his part in the crimes‚Äďand he is naming names. Fielder says that, acting in concert with Saleem Baird of the Cochran camp, he agreed to pay $15.00 each to black Democrats who crossed over to vote for Cochran in last month‚Äôs runoff against Chris McDaniel. Fielder was to receive $16,000 in return.

The conduct admitted to by Rev. Fielder constitutes violations of both federal and Mississippi State voting laws and could put all of the conspirators in prison. What makes this charge so believable is that just three years ago, the head of the Mississippi NAACP was sent to prison for...

Since liberals are primarily emotionally driven absurd accusations serve them well,such as this one,they label any attempt to hold minorities to any standard such as showing identification to vote as a return to slavery,irresponsability is freedom and responsibility is slavery in their warped view of the world.

That being the case it is those of us who are paying for it all who are the slaves.

William S. Sutherland wrote:Jim,When you spout LIES like "the Tea Party would want to reinstitute slavery" you show yourself to be without integrity, just like that reprobate in the White House. It's the Demoncrat Party that has continued slavery up to our present day with their welfare state plantation.Remember this next time you LIE through your teeth about Tea Party members: Revelation¬†21:8 "...and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."

Not his fault. He can't help it, he's just working out his own programming without fear and trembling.

And "The Reconstructionist movement and its allies and offshoots, by substituting political and cultural action for the proclamation of the Gospel, by substituting eschatology for soteriology, and by mangling the Gospel itself, have become tools of Romanist political action" (3/02, The Trinity Review).' excerpt from, Notes on Reconstructionism

Makes me wonder... Its a good thing that the pastor felt bad about being on the take from the establishment Republicans but I wonder if he think it wrong to do the same thing for his own party. Something tells me that he and other pastors have been doing this all the time.

Jim,When you spout LIES like "the Tea Party would want to reinstitute slavery" you show yourself to be without integrity, just like that reprobate in the White House. It's the Demoncrat Party that has continued slavery up to our present day with their welfare state plantation.

Remember this next time you LIE through your teeth about Tea Party members: Revelation¬†21:8 "...and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."

UPS, yes, my Republican party voted for those Constitutional amendments, but the only reason it didn't contain any white Southerners in it! Don't try to say the neo-Confederates would've voted for those amendments, because obvious they didn't.Oh,

Wikipedia wrote:After World War II, during the civil rights movement, Democrats in the South initially still voted loyally with their party. After the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the old argument that all whites had to stick together to prevent civil rights legislation lost its force because the legislation had now been passed. More and more whites began to vote Republican, especially in the suburbs and growing cities. Newcomers from the North were mostly Republican; they were now joined by conservatives and wealthy Southern whites, while liberal whites and poor whites, especially in rural areas, remained with the Democratic Party.

excerpt from, Southern Democrats. There are issues with the article--one is they didn't mention many Northern Jews moved to Florida, and they remained Democratic.

Too many Protestants doing the bidding of Catholics, like they did in the Spanish-American War, courtesy of Hearst.

Lemme think this out which party did not vote for the 14-16th amendments, that would be the democrats. Which party, with majorities in both houses, voted in much smaller percentage for the civil rights act, that would be democrats.

Racism and Jim Crow laws were nearly ubiquitous in the South. Which party had been in charge since radical reconstruction, that would be the democrats.

Which president (as a senator) BLOCKED civil rights legislation under Eisenhower and then put it through say he was get those ******** to vote democratic, that would be democrat LBJ.

Which party started the KKK? Think I am seeing a pattern here, go to the head of class if you said, democrats.

Who started the NAACP to counter them, not democrats, republicans. (although you'd never know that now)

Jim Lincoln wrote:They should know the tea party types have plenty of money. They should've put the touch on them. Besides smart Blacks would know that the Tea Party would want to reinstitute slavery, so they wouldn't have to be bribed to crossover and vote for Cochran Oh, and Sam‚Äôs Club Republicans Vs. the Tea Party

They should know the tea party types have plenty of money. They should've put the touch on them. Besides smart Blacks would know that the Tea Party would want to reinstitute slavery, so they wouldn't have to be bribed to crossover and vote for Cochran Oh, and Sam‚Äôs Club Republicans Vs. the Tea Party.