2. Order of CSS Concepts section

This section will explain or point to references for browser support,
incompatibilities, and possible assistive technology incompatibilities.

4. Units of measure

Create exhaustive lists for which css properties can use em, % vs px.

5. Creating movement with style sheets and scripts

This section needs work. How will it link to or share responsibilities
with the client-side scripting techniques?

8. References

References need to be updated and references consistently. In previous
versions, we did not link direclty from text but linked to a reference at the
end of the doc which linked to the actual reference. Continue to do this?
Need to link to refererences that are only listed. What is the best grouping
of references?

9. WCAG 1.0 vs WCAG 2.0 techniques

I stripped out all of the references to WCAG 1.0 checkpoints, and moved
references to WCAG 2.0 checkpoints to the end in the assessment table. Do we
want to do some sort of mapping? This document should be referenced by both
WCAG 1.0 or WCAG 2.0, right?

10. General additions and work needed

We need:

More examples of good and bad practices, particularly to replace the
long laundry lists of what properties are possible to use.

18. Color Contrast section needs work

19. Example of rules and borders

Closed Issues

6. Assessing accessibility of CSS for HTML

This section needs the data for which tools will automatically identify
accessibility problems with CSS usage, versus those that will flag possible
problems. Also need to finish filling in the manual checks.

7. Assessing accessibility of CSS for XML

This section needs info. At this point, no info at all.

12. Convert to new wcag-tech.dtd and set up publishing process

I created the table of contents by hand (mostly using the table of
contents from the WCAG 1.0 draft). Need to set up the publishing process that
checks spelling, broken links, etc. as we had for that draft. Part of this is
to conver the doc to the wcag-tech.dtd instead of xhtml1.1.