If you like discussing politics and other related topics then your new home (hopefully) for doing just that can be found on Punndits.com! Come join us and help us grow Punndits into a wonderful and safe place to discuss politics with everyone.

i guarantee you USC wouldnt have hammered that Ohio state team on a neutral field. did you miss the part where terrell pryor barely played in the first game? the defense was much improved and beanie wells didnt play?

dbair1967;2564082 said:

If Texas had won convincingly the other night, I'd agree with you.

Utah I think got over on Alabama more because Alabama didnt care I think...huge letdown for them after losing the SEC Champ game, they had nothing to play for.

Texas did have something to play for, and performed poorly.

Click to expand...

so its all about winning convincingly to you? if it was about that, OU would have gone undefeated because they blasted everyone, but thats not how it works, its about players making plays when it matters most, like tebow showed today and colt has shown again and again.

Texas > USC this year. Just accept it. I know you are used to USC being the top dog, but every now and again, another team is just above them, this year it is Texas and even Utah. BTW, I would say ** also....since they beat #1 Alabama and #1 OU.

Click to expand...

Well thats all we have his opinions on it, because they dont play a real championship game.

Pac 10 was 5-0 in bowl games, Big 12 was 4-3. IMO USC was the best team in the country all yr, save one slip up on the road on Thursday night.

And for the record, Utah had the most impressive win beating Alabama who was number one for a good period of time, and they beat Bama in all phases.

Click to expand...

an Alabama team with nothing at all to play for, missing its best player

I'm not saying USC couldn't have beaten either of these teams but I am saying that they didn't deserve to be there more then Texas did.

Click to expand...

its a stupid system isnt it?

then again, I know I'm never going to hear an OU fan say Texas deserved it so it's cool. I understand how it goes.

Click to expand...

OU people shouldnt ever be running their mouths again...they should ban them from the BCS as long as they have this system...I do agree Texas deserved to play in the game more than OU, but I still think USC was the best team

an Alabama team with nothing at all to play for, missing its best player

its a stupid system isnt it?

OU people shouldnt ever be running their mouths again...they should ban them from the BCS as long as they have this system...I do agree Texas deserved to play in the game more than OU, but I still think USC was the best team

Click to expand...

TT is no fraud in Lubbock. They are as good in Lubbock as OU is in Norman or USC is at the Coliseum.

an Alabama team with nothing at all to play for, missing its best player

its a stupid system isnt it?

OU people shouldnt ever be running their mouths again...they should ban them from the BCS as long as they have this system...I do agree Texas deserved to play in the game more than OU, but I still think USC was the best team

Click to expand...

So, Alabama had nothing to play for but Texas should have crushed OSU because they had everything to play for? The whole AP voting thing is BS. They were never ever going to get a shot.

Penn State beat OSU on a fluke at the end of that game. Ohio State beat themselves in that game IMO. Tech was a top 5 team at one time but they were certainly a top 10 team. As for USC, they lost to an inferrior team and they played nobody other then Ohio State at the right time. I just don't agree but I do think, as you do, that the BCS sucks.