Criticism of Rigorous Censorship Imposed by Allies

Immediately after the outbreak of war in Europe, rigid censorship was imposed on press and radio by the belligerent governments. To date, more news of a military character has emanated from Berlin than from either London or Paris—a circumstance which, although due in part to the early success of the German drive into Poland, has given rise to much criticism in the Allied countries, particularly Great Britain.

Arthur Greenwood, daputy leader of the British Labour party, told the House of Commons, September 7, that there was “growing uneasiness” over the lack of information concerning the war, and urged the government to give the nation more news, whether good or bad. Six days later, Greenwood again criticized the government's censorship policy, asserting that many foreign correspondents were planning to move to a neutral country to escape the rigors of the censorship. At the same time, Sir Archibald Sinclair, parliamentary leader of the Liberal party, condemned the government's action in suppressing details of the Royal Air Force raid on the Kiel canal.

In the House of Lords, Lord Snell, Labour leader, declared that “we could get more information from America than we can get here,” and Lord Camrose, publisher of the London Daily Telegraph, said key positions in the newly-established Ministry of Information were held by inexperienced men, A resolution expressing “grave concern at the failure of the Ministry of Information to provide the public with adequate news of the conduct of the war” was adopted, September 8, by the executive council of the National Union of Journalists. In an editorial, September 12, the Yorkshire Post urged “that there should be introduced some power of imagination in dealing with news.”