Following a radio show debate yesterday
in which a 9/11 hit piece article written by Jonathon Moseley for World
Net Daily was exposed
as containing numerous flaws and baseless allegations, the
online news site was later forced to issue a retraction.

One of the most glaring inaccuracies of
the article was Moseley's claim that Professor Steven Jones of the 9/11
Truth Scholars, during a conference aired on C-Span, called "for the
violent overthrow of the government."

After painstaking analysis of all the
tapes from the conference there was no evidence whatsoever that a statement
even close to this nature was ever made by Jones.

Following the radio debate, World Net
Daily were pressed into issuing the following retraction on their website.

Editor's note, Aug. 17, 2006: In paragraph
four of this column, the author makes an assertion about professor Steven
Jones' remarks at a 9/11 symposium broadcast by C-SPAN. A review of the
program online evidenced no such comments by Jones."

Despite the fact that the claim has been
ridiculed and a retraction issued, it can still be read in the fourth paragraph
of the article. Since the false claim is potentially damaging to Professor
Steven Jones' career - it should be removed altogether.

The last major instance where a retraction
to a 9/11 hit piece was issued was in the case of Cinnamon
Stillwell's San Francisco Chronicle article in which she claimed
that the "whole country witnessed the horrific sight of planes flying
into the....Pentagon," an obviously fraudulent claim given that no
clear footage of whatever hit the Pentagon was shown on 9/11 or to this
day.

"Cinnamon Stillwell's column
Wednesday on SFGate originally stated that images of the plane that struck
the Pentagon had been seen by the American public. No such images have been
made public," read the Chronicle's retraction.

Now we have forced two major websites,
one being one of the biggest newspapers in the country, to eat crow and
in the case of the journalists concerned, expose themselves as narrow-minded
and inept in performing the most basic research skills.

Mistakes mirrored by other large newspapers
who seem gung-ho about attacking 9/11 researchers yet seem to struggle when
it comes to actually naming them correctly or accurately citing their work.

This latest example of ineptitude on the
part of Moseley and World Net Daily only brings their other claims about
9/11 under further scrutiny. If they can't even ascribe the correct statements
to the right people, yet use false allegations to try and smear the characters
of respected professionals, how can we trust their assertions that 9/11
skeptics are wrong?

The agenda of these individuals is not
to research the subject matter and present an honest appraisal of the evidence,
it is to zealously savage and try and discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
In most cases this isn't because they are on a CIA payroll, it's because
any dissenting voice that challenges their cosey world view is an affront
to them - and they will go to any lengths to shout us down - including inventing
quotes and using them to tar people with.

Unfortunately, their faux pas are as stiflingly
obvious as a turd in a punch bowl - and their credibility sinks ever deeper
each time they try and pull one of these stunts.

Following a spate of editorials which
sought to debunk
the 9/11 truth movement and personally attack its progenitors,
released on cue almost as if an order went out, this website will continue
to defend our friends and colleagues from unfounded personal attacks and
also counter any attempts to debunk credible 9/11 evidence.