Total Visits

Wednesday, 18 January 2017

“Fight the Good Fight with all thy might!"

Fight the Good Fight with all thy might!

I am a strong believer in the idea that we owe it to ourselves and to our English Cause to use all appropriate tools and opportunities etc. that are open to us to advance the Cause and also to defend ourselves from opponents.

One of the things that is altogether too obvious is that the police have come down hard on Right-wing, nationalistic, patriotic protesters even when they are being basically law-abiding. This is in stark contrast to their treatment of Left-wing, anti-racist, anti-FA, Hope not Hate types and other multi-culturalist campaigners. My suspicion has been that not only is there a degree of bias, as people have often maintained, but also there has been insufficient action on our side to use all available opportunities to counter-attack or to get in a pre-emptive attack on opponents.

One example is the Government’s new “Prevent” strategy, which has been sold to the public as being part of an anti-terrorism campaign. Most people, who only skim read news stories and do not pay close attention to what is going on, may still think “Prevent” is focussed solely on Islamist terrorists and troublemakers.

Let me tell you now unequivocally that it isn’t!

You don’t need to be an English nationalist for this to apply to you. It will be enough for you to be a traditional Conservative!

So let’s see whether, as far as the Government is concerned, YOU are an “EXTREMIST”?

The Government has been busy developing a wholly partisan definition of “Britishness” and/of “British values”.

Those who do not read these things carefully, may think that their values because they are traditional and that they are historically British that they would qualify as part of “Britishness”.

Let me tell you now - no they don’t necessarily!

Here is the Government definition of "Britishness" and of "British" values. They only apply in England so read it carefully!

I have highlighted the bit that you need to pay particular attention in bold and underlined.

“The Department for (English only) Education has … published guidance on promoting British values in schools to ensure young people leave school …

The guidance aims to help both independent and state-maintained schools understand their responsibilities in this area. All have a duty to ‘actively promote’ the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs. These values were first set out by the government in the ‘Prevent’ strategy in 2011.

Until now schools have been required to ‘respect’ these values, but as a result of changes brought in earlier in the year all schools must now have a clear strategy for embedding these values and show how their work with pupils has been effective in doing so. In a letter to the Education Select Committee in March, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Schools Lord Nash explained the changes were designed to “tighten up the standards on pupil welfare to improve safeguarding, and the standards on spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils to strengthen the barriers to extremism”.

Ofsted and the independent inspectorates now take the work of schools in this area into account during inspections.

Publishing the guidance today, Lord Nash said:

A key part of our plan for education is to ensure children become valuable and fully rounded members of society who treat others with respect and tolerance, regardless of background.

We want every school to promote the basic British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance for those of different faiths and beliefs.

This ensures young people understand the importance of respect and leave school fully prepared for life in modern Britain.

Examples of the understanding and knowledge pupils are expected to learn include: an understanding of how citizens can influence decision-making through the democratic process an understanding that the freedom to hold other faiths and beliefs is protected in law an acceptance that people having different faiths or beliefs to oneself (or having none) should be accepted and tolerated, and should not be the cause of prejudicial or discriminatory behaviour an understanding of the importance of identifying and combatting discrimination

Examples of actions schools can take to promote British values are to: include in suitable parts of the curriculum - as appropriate for the age of pupils - material on the strengths, advantages and disadvantages of democracy, and how democracy and the law works in Britain, in contrast to other forms of government in other countries ensure all pupils within the school have a voice that is listened to, and demonstrate how democracy works by actively promoting democratic processes such as a school council whose members are voted for by the pupils use opportunities such as general or local elections to hold mock elections to promote fundamental British values and provide pupils with the opportunity to learn how to argue and defend points of view consider the role of extra-curricular activity, including any run directly by pupils, in promoting fundamental British values

The government today also published its interim response to a consultation of the revised Independent Schools Standards (ISS). The revised standards cover independent schools, academies and free schools, ensuring they - along with local authority-maintained schools - must promote British values.”

If you are not absolutely certain that I have got this right, check it out on the link.

On the other hand if you have read the definitions carefully, ask yourself if you agree with EVERY aspect of that definition being applied only in England? If you don’t then you are what the Government is trying to redefine as an “Extremist”.

What about if, for example, you are a serious and practising Christian and you believe Jesus’ statement in the Gospel of St John, Chapter 14, Verse 6:- “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me”? If so then you are an “Extremist” and your values are not the British Government’s “British values”!

Since these values are the litmus test, here in England, as to whether or not you are an “Extremist” that means that so far as the system is concerned you are an “Extremist” and the “Prevent” strategy is there to disrupt you, your life and your associations.

You might ask how does all this relate to what I said in the beginning, that we are not doing enough to use what is available to us? Well the point is that it is not only us who would not necessarily support every last bit of the Government’s definition of multi-culti “Britishness”, but also the Left don’t support it either.

There is a case that I have recently been advising in which is relevant.

As part of the case we reported a Leftist troublemaker to the police. He was visited by the relevant police Prevent Team and has now been put on the Prevent “Watch List” as an Extremist!

What that means is that if that Leftist now takes part in any activity in the future which is hostile to, for example, English nationalists, then the police are far more likely to crackdown on him than they would have been hitherto.

From now on he will be on the “Watch List” and will be flagged up as somebody whose activities ought to be disrupted.

It is the same with reporting anti-English so called “Hate Crimes”. These always ought to be reported. If a police officer shows any reluctance to accept it as a “hate crime” then a complaint should be made against the officer concerned. The complaint should be taken as far as it can up the Police Forces' complaints system so that it gets into the records that a lot of the “hate crime” is perpetrated against the English rather than by them.

Equally no opportunity should be lost to insist that you are “English” on ethnic monitoring forms rather than permitting yourself to be put down as “British” which is a legally invalid category and therefore waives your rights and your community’s rights under the Equality Act.

I could of course give many other examples of where we need to make sure that we do pull our weight, but I am sure you get the point! But don’t be put off by any official discouragement!

Remember the parable of the unjust Judge in the Gospel of St Luke, Chapter 18, Verse 6:- “There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man: And there was a widow in that city; and she came unto him, saying, Avenge me of mine adversary. And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard man; Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me. And the Lord said, Hear what the unjust judge saith."

3 comments:

Perhaps a start in this regard would be to report supermarkets who describe Scottish sourced foods as "Scottish" (complete with Saltire logo)but English sourced foods as "British" (complete with Union Flag logo) for perpetrating a "Hate-Crime". (Yes, I AM serious!) Any advice as to how to proceed?Clive,W-s-M.

I think I am right in saying that Trump has said that countries have a right to object to mass immigration changing their national identities. This should be flagged as the number one hate crime in Europe, against its indigenous peoples. Could you not argue that this is the greatest hate crime, Robin?

The ultra-rich in Davos are running around like headless chickens faced with populism. The odious Joe Biden who has used "liberal" interventionist policy in the Ukraine to enrich himself and his family has said they must carry on with the good work. And then the spotlight shining on him went out. Hopefully, he and his ilk will now fade into history in the same manner; afer all these are the people who have used globalism/globalisation to line their pockets and of whom eight of their number own as much as half the world's population.

Six British people have been killed in a road accident in Saudi Arabia on their way to Mecca and today we hear that a Briton has been killed building a stadium for the 2022 in Qatar; but then so many Indians have been killed in this way. I way to see what a Briton means as now it can mean somebody from anywhere in the world. As for a hate crime, surely mass immigration into England was/is a hate crime against the English, as it is against our continental cousins, the theft of our country from us by people from all over the world? In a video made last year, Alex Jones of Infowars, referred to hatred against white people by others; or more often by their own. Following the War this has been the world's major hate crime; an attack on Europeans, their homelands and their culture and Christianity. I cannot see how making such an obvious statement constitutes a hate crime by me since I am only telling the truth that they will not acknowledge.

The Davos headless chickens have now changed tack in the light of the populist revolt and are now talking localism. Do not be fooled; devolving powers to Town Councils by the government is one way of ensuring that when the parish precept and the council tax go up then the government can tell the voters that their town council is not doing its job economically. And I have heard that the ultimate aim is localism and regionalism. Already in Oxfordshire there is talk of abolishing the district councils and having one unitary county authority. They will not give up easily as Trump is finding out. John Kerry at Devos has given him two years whilst Palmyra, liberated by the Russians and the Syrians is now being blown up again even though the area is meant to be covered by the US-led coalition as a way of preventing this happening.