Is Donald trump a rapist -- do we want a rapist as president:?:

If we are to believe one percent is what's reported or assumed by journalists, reporters etc.. , then we tone it down a lot... . Hillary is still a
murderous traitorous demon fiend, and Donald trump cat called some lady.

It's amazing that you guys have all this concern for a story with zero evidence, yet Bill Clinton has several women accusing him of rape and he lied
during investigation into sexual harassment. And yet you guys give Bill Clinton a complete pass. It's baffling.

If Hillary can have evidence leaked and still no charges, then a story with no evidence isn't even worth mentioning...NEXT!

I also see a lot of people complaining about being labeled as Hillary supporters. Well get over it, because a bunch of people on here that get
labeled as Trump supporters even though we're just voting against the proven criminal. The only difference is we bring stories that have a little
evidence to back it up instead of this non-story.

originally posted by: neutronflux
And Hillary never harassed and conspired against Bill's rape victims? Seems to be a hypocritical post? Not justifying anyone's behavior, but let's
compare Trump allegations to Clinton allegations.

“We have to destroy her story,” Mrs. Clinton said in 1991 of Connie Hamzy, one of the first women to come forward during her husband’s first
presidential campaign, according to George Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton administration aide who described the events in his memoir, “All Too
Human.” (Three people signed sworn affidavits saying Ms. Hamzy’s story was false.)

When Gennifer Flowers later surfaced, saying that she had had a long affair with Mr. Clinton, Mrs. Clinton undertook an “aggressive, explicit
direction of the campaign to discredit” Ms. Flowers, according to an exhaustive biography of Mrs. Clinton, “A Woman in Charge,” by Carl
Bernstein.

Now you are worried about women's issues? Where have you been for twenty or thirty years?

How is it hypocritical, the post isn't about Hillary

Trump supporters really need to stop doing this

Lack of support for trump doesn't = Hillary support

This black and white attitude is a symptom of a larger disease that's turned terminal

I have a rotten apple and a rotten orange. You can choose one to keep. You have to choose one, or someone else will choose for you. Either way, one is
kept.

The apple has visible worms in it and fruit flies. The orange is bright orange and looks ok, but you don't like the smell of oranges.

So you are keeping the apple, and discarding the orange. You can't argue against one, and not expect the other to be supported by default.

But really it doesn't matter, the apple prefers to blame her fruit flies and worms on the orange anyway.

People don't have to stoop to new lows with Trump they just have to wait for him to open his mouth.

I've not heard anything in his speeches that betray his ability to be president. Sounds like more of the same mud slinging hoping it sticks.

No he doesn't. If you listen to his economic plan the wealthy will get what they want like usual.

You really think any of the alternatives are going be changing anything? Especially by people who are funded by the very criminals that are creating
almost all of the economic chaos globally? They do not have your interests in mind.

Tell me, what is your economic plan that fixes things? Is there one? Can you foment something? Will everyone agree with you? What is the magic
solution...

Sounds like the wealthy will get treated equally, while not negating the benefits of hard working citizens, whilst also allowing for
reconsiderations.

First, let’s talk tax reform.

Taxes are one of the biggest differences in this race.

Hillary Clinton – who has spent her career voting for tax increases – plans another massive job-killing $1.3 trillion-dollar tax increase. Her
plan would tax many small businesses by almost fifty percent.

Recently, at a campaign event, Hillary Clinton short-circuited again – to use a now famous term – when she accidentally told the truth and said
she wanted to raise taxes on the middle class.

I am proposing an across-the-board income tax reduction, especially for middle-income Americans. This will lead to millions of new good-paying
jobs.

The rich will pay their fair share, but no one will pay so much that it destroys jobs, or undermines our ability to compete.

As part of this reform, we will eliminate the Carried Interest Deduction and other special interest loopholes that have been so good for Wall Street
investors, and people like me, but unfair to American workers.

...

While we will develop our own set of assumptions and policies, agreeing in some areas but not in others, we will be focused on the same shared goals
and guided by the same shared principles: jobs, growth and opportunity.

He does? Please link them I'm ready for a good chuckle.

Pointless. You are not even interested in the prosperity and safety of your own country, I see. Go watch youtube videos if you want a chuckle, I'm not
your personal comic.

The second accusation of sexual assault comes from a 1997 lawsuit. Jill Harth says she and her romantic partner were working with Trump on a
business deal, when The Donald started making unwelcome sexual advances.

Could there ever be a case for 'welcomed' sexual advances from Donald Trump?

Anything, and I mean anything coming from Glenn Beck is garbage news, Fusion included. The real question one needs to ask is, do we want a certified
serial rapist enabler, thief, liar, deceiver former secretary of state to be president. I think the only answer to the question is no. The hit piece
on Trump is just tabloid wishful thinking from Glenn Beck.

originally posted by: jjkenobi
This thread should go to the HOAX bin. What a joke.

There is a pending lawsuit against Trump and convicted billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein (whom Bill Clinton partied with just as much as Trump
did) for the rape of a then 13 year old girl back in 1994.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.