Thinfilm, a Norwegian developer of printable memory, has co-announced with California's PARC a development that takes a big step towards the day when every manufactured object will report in to the internet.
Yes, the "internet of things" – the buzzword of the decade.
Thinfilm and PARC's breakthrough is a technology that can …

...wha..HUH! Is it still the 1960s?

You realize...

...that all ICs are is a large collection of very small transistors, right?

OK, so we're not talking nanometer process here - but we ARE talking about (eventually) about Marty McFly's self-resizing jacket. Possibly about the end of shoplifting (and equally possibly, the end of checkout registers in stores) - The items you think you're lifting will simply report themselves to the store system, your personal biometrics will be queried by the door as you exit, your identity established, and your bank account suitably debited.

Of course, that means that even the illusion of privacy will be extinct.

It also means that your car can rat you out every time you exceed a limit, that fines can be assesed 'on the fly,' that your underwear can tell your spouse that you've been banging someone else - and WHO that 'someone else' was...

'on the fly'

Now just imagine...

Now just imagine radio interfaces, solar panels and sticky surfaces all made in this technology. You could easily build a meshed network of routers which just sit on lamp-posts creating a censorship proof network.

Of course this is still a long way down the road, but if technology progresses in that direction we might get there.

"we got two kinds of teknology, nfc AND rfid, around here"

You can already make tags reasonably cheaply, yet uptake has been slower and generally more forced than the hype would suggest. Dropping the price further will likely increase uptake, sure, but how much is something else again. And, well, so far there's been an abundance of stupidity and entirely predictable security problems with this sort of thing. Like those rfid pressure sensors in tyres. "Wireless" is so seductively easy it causes its very own, very "special", classes of problems. And it'll will be a while before we'll catch on to it and learn to deal with it. Fun times ahead, fun times for the cheesehole-plugging "security" industry. But no comprehensive security solutions designed in right from the start though we know exactly what's gonna happen. Oh well, have fun then.

Sir

Along with this technology I hope someone bright can come up with a way of destroying these infernal things, like a suicide booth for tracking things.

You go out and buy loads of shit like a good consumer, are blissfully unaware your every movement is being tracked. But hey, what's that? Step right in, kkkkkkkzzzzzzap. All your printed tracking devices are belong to dead.

Grazio, I can walk my way down the street blissfully unaware I'm being tracked by 73 camera's all linked to a centralised database with facial recognition.

I'm now flagged as a subversive, and they came for me in the dead of night.

OLED?

Forgive me, but I thought that OLED display screens were printed circuitry, at a much higher density than this? Hundreds of thousands of polymer light emitters and thousands (at least) of transistors addressing them.

Silicon transistors cheaper

It isn't really the cheapness of the transistors - If you need a lot of them you better go with silicon. It is really making something with big and robust contacts. A tiny silicon chip might actually be cheaper transistor-wise, until you figure in how to connect to it.