L'ONU nella
tua lingua!

UN EXPERTS EXPRESS CONCERN AT LENGTH OF CUSTODY FOR ILLEGAL MIGRANTS IN MALTA

A group of independent United Nations
human rights experts today voiced concern about the length of time immigrants
rescued off the coast of Malta spend in custody, saying it is not “in line with
international human rights law.”

The human rights experts noted that
illegal immigrants arriving in Malta after enduring risky voyages from North
African shores are subject to long periods of automatic detention without
genuine legal recourse.

“We consider that the detention regime
applied to them is not in line with international human rights law,” said Chairperson
of the Working on Arbitrary Detention Manuela Carmena Castrillo.

“We have met an 8-year-old boy, who
should not be detained at all, and a Somali man, suffering from HIV and chicken
pox, vegetating in a cell in complete isolation, who should rather be in
hospital,” added Ms. Carmena Castrillo.

The Maltese Government releases
asylum-seekers after 12 months of detention, at the latest, if their asylum
claim is still pending. Those who do not apply or whose applications are
rejected can end up in custody for 18 months under appalling conditions, the
Working Group said at the conclusion of its five-day fact-finding mission to the
country.

Although disagreeing with the mandatory
detention of immigrants in an irregular situation, the experts said that if
incarceration is necessary, its length should at least be clearly defined under
law, adding that there appears to be no connection between the specifics of an
individual case and the length of custody.

The Group questioned the legitimacy of
mandatory detention, pointing out that under Maltese immigration law detention
is resorted to in order to carry out removal from its territory.

The Government, however, informed the
Working Group that out of the 12,000 immigrants detained since 2002, only around
2,000 have been repatriated.

“In particular, we cannot accept how
detention of vulnerable groups of persons can be deemed to be the last resort,
as required by applicable international human rights law and also by the
so-called ‘EU Return Directive,’ which the Government of Malta has to transpose
into national law now,” said Ms. Carmena Castrillo.

Malta applies a fast-track
procedure for the release of families with children, unaccompanied minors,
pregnant women and breast-feeding mothers, and people with disabilities, serious
or chronic physical or mental health problems. However, according to the
Government, it may take up to three months to free them and those who are
considered a health risk for the community must stay in detention.

“We must not forget that immigrants
arriving without proper documentation are not criminals. What we must not
forget, either, is that Malta is a small country with by far the highest
population density in Europe and limited financial and human resources at hand,”
stressed Ms. Carmena Castrillo, stressing that the country cannot manage the
large increase of arrivals without the help of the international community.

“We are facing a truly human tragedy
here, but we sense that the Government can and should do better already at this
point in time.”

The experts also noted the relatively
long periods of time defendants spend in detention while awaiting trial and the
high rate of detainees on remand in comparison to the overall prison population.

“We are concerned about the figures we
have heard: more than 50 per cent of the prisoners in Malta are pre-trial
detainees, which is a comparably high rate,” said Vice-Chair of the five-member
Group El Hadji Malick Sow.

“We are also concerned about allegations
received that the rules of release on bail were not to be equally applied by
courts to Maltese citizens and foreigners alike,” he added.

Mr. Malick Sow recommended that “the
Government considers establishing a system of release on parole,” recalling the
fundamental right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and
the right to be tried without undue delay, both of which are well-entrenched in
international human rights law.

During its mission to Malta, the Group
met with senior government authorities of the executive, legislative and
judicial branches, as well as with representatives of UN agencies, international
organizations, civil society and the Chamber of Advocates.