Bold italics underline and actually saying "Secure, Contain, Protect" puts a piece below professional wrestling in terms of believability and seriousness. It makes the Foundation look like it's staffed by tryhard 14 year olds.

And that's not even going into the fact that this is two paragraphs which involves a five year old somehow wandering onto a Foundation site. Who they then kill for no discernible reason.

First of all, the entire note is unclinical. It doesn't sound like something a Foundation doctor/researcher would write. (I'm not talking about Jimmy's letter)

Second, as I said, that escalated quickly. This article is way to short to be good, and it went from a little boy having nightmares to him being dead.

Subject was observed for a month before finally terminated after the repeated asking of others with the phrase "Please put this boy out of his misery I have to test him every day and he complains about the nightmares".

First: "The subject was observed for approximately one month before being terminated due to…" and I won't go further than that because,

Second: No. The Foundation would not kill a kid because some researchers felt uncomfortable. The article doesn't even convey the kid as being uncomfortable. What you're telling me here is that, because some researchers felt bad, they killed him. I mean, you could pull this off if you portrayed the kid being extremely miserable, sad, and scared.

Also, that's an extremely cliche ending. I'm fairly certain that a similar ending has been done at least 4-5 times or more, and they've pulled it off better than this has. I'd downvote as is.

tl;dr: Improve the tone, make it longer, make me actually care about the kid, and I'd likely upvote.