On 2010-08-23 20:52, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
> We offer an optional internet content filtering service to our residential
> and business customers using M86's appliance
> (http://www.m86security.com/products/web_security/m86-web-filtering-reportin> g-suite.asp).
>> I've been in conversation with them since Q1 regards IPv6 support, but the
> update I received today was that IPv6 support won't be available until
> middle to late next year. That's not ideal, because the local college is a
> significant user and they started with IPv6 this summer. College students
> can easily bypass content filtering by using the IPv6 version of the site
> (i.e. http://www.playboy.com.sixxs.org)
Emmm.. if they can use that to circumvent your filter don't you think
those same people won't be able to find out about other proxy servers,
it is not like the internet is not filled with them or anything.
Please note to yourself that you are fighting a lost cause as there are
more locations on the Internet that are annoying for the policy than you
can list, thus one of the very few ways to make it very hard to 'filter'
is to only allow approved sites, and with 'approve' I mean fetch the URL
on a controlled machine, scrub it and pass it back, as the moment
somebody can have a host on the outside and can send a few bits to it
and get an answer back they are outside, if you like it or not.
That said, there are loads of free HTTP proxies, anonymizers and other
such tools and most of them are not caught by your filtering toy anyway.
But indeed, it is a bad thing that they are unable to update their
little box to do IPv6, there really is not that much different there.
Greets,
Jeroen
(Who could block stuff on the above URL actually, but except for
silly people trying to run torrents over it which does not work but
which do hammer those boxes nothing gets blocked [CP is the except])