National governments use evidence selectively to argue that a successful policy intervention in one local area should be emulated in others ('evidence-based best practice'). However, the value of such evidence is always limited because there is: disagreement on the best way to gather
evidence of policy success, uncertainty regarding the extent to which we can draw general conclusions from specific evidence, and local policymaker opposition to interventions not developed in local areas. How do governments respond to this dilemma? This article identifies the Scottish Government
response: it supports three potentially contradictory ways to gather evidence and encourage emulation.

This article was made available online on April 17, 2016 as a Fast Track article with title: "Evidence-based best practice is more political than it looks: a case study of the ‘Scottish Approach’".

More about this publication?

Evidence & Policy is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to comprehensive and critical assessment of the relationship between research evidence and the concerns of policy makers and practitioners, as well as researchers.