PER CURIAM: Reversed pursuant to Rule 220(b) (1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Edwards v. State, 372 S.C. 497, 642 S.E.2d 738 (2007) (Court will reverse the PCR judge’s decision when it is controlled by an error of law); Clark v. State, 315 S.C. 385, 434 S.E.2d 266 (1993) (this Court will reverse the grant of PCR based upon after-discovered evidence where movant must fails to demonstrate the evidence: (1) is such that it would probably change the result if a new trial were granted; (2) has been discovered since the trial; (3) could not in the exercise of due diligence have been discovered prior to trial; (4) is material; (5) is not merely cumulative or impeaching).