Imposing sanctions on Russia is an act of war and will not serve its purpose, Ron Paul Institute's Daniel McAdams told RT. The Ukrainian stalemate can only be resolved by returning to February 21 agreement between Yanukovich and the opposition.

RT:Russia is pushing Europe to reconsider
the legitimacy of the new leadership in Kiev and also investigate
its alleged crimes. Do you think any of that will actually
happen?

Daniel McAdams: Well, I’m pretty skeptical about
these kinds of investigations, but the core disagreement between
the US, the EU and Russia is really very simple – was the
government installed after the coup legal, or is it not? And is
Yanukovich legally, according to Ukrainian constitution still the
president? So everything else I think is sort of window dressing.
The two sides fundamentally disagree on this.

I think there is a quite easy solution to this problem, which is
probably, not that I’m in the business of giving advice, but go
back to the 21 February agreement where you will have an
extremely weak president in power. He will have some sort of a
technical government taking over until the elections can be
organized. It is a face-saving measure for the US. The Russians
don’t get everything that they want. The problem can be solved,
but it will take some sacrifice, some listening and some
consideration that the coup is not legitimate.

RT:And the things have moved on now rapidly
with this upcoming referendum in Crimea on Sunday. Why are the
Western governments so opposed to its bid for independence?

DM: Well you know it is funny, former ambassador
to Moscow Michal McFaul has been twitting away about “Crimea is
not Kosovo, Crimea is not Kosovo!” Madeline Albright, former
secretary of state has chimed in as well.

It is kind of interesting to see the people who supported the
lawless coup in the streets of Kiev, now all of the sudden being
the strongest stringers for every fine point in the Ukrainian
constitution. You know it is quite funny. The point of the matter
is that there are differences and there are similarities…

RT:Alright, what are the parallels then? Do
you think the Crimeans do have the right to draw a parallel to
what happened in Kosovo?

DM: Well the point to be made is the double
standards of the US and the hypocrisy of the US. The US has been
endlessly going on about the will of the Albanian people in
Kosovo, how they have the right to express their view and their
will and have their own future.

And now that the shoe is on the other foot, the place that they
don’t want to break away, they are saying something very, very
different. Which is that they don’t have the right to do the same
thing. So the hypocrisy is more important, than whether or not
they have the right to do this.

RT:If the vote does go ahead, and the
Crimeans vote for independence, the G7 says they will not
recognize this bid for independence. What actually could these
countries do about it?

DM: Well are they going to isolate, are they
going to sanction a major world power, in particularly when you
have both China and India recently expressing support for the
Russian position? It is absurd. This is not Syria, this is not
Cuba that you are going to embargo. In any case sanctions are an
act of war. And it is a ridiculous move for the US and EU to
face. Even the referendum is not necessary if you go back to the
21st agreement, back down, and look for a way forward. Can the US
do that? I doubt it.