Although it seems a most unlikely
thing to do, Dr Hicks has set out to create an A to Z cocktail menu of the
diagnoses that could theoretically plague us if we developed signs of any of
them. How politically correct, or wise, this may be is put aside for a moment,
as one contemplates the blurb on the inside dust cover. This book is written
for anyone concerned, amongst other things, about symptoms observed in family
or friends. Such an assertion I am sure brings chills to a scientologist’s
spine, well, possibly to many spines, fostering a hoard of family psych-sleuths
to venture forth and be diagnostic.

Its not quite an A-Z, covering 50
titles, from (no not anxiety) anger to trauma. Yet it is enough to worry a few
people I can think of. The introduction is sobering enough, warning that these
are signs and symptoms, but that one does not know what causes them. We are
warned that normality is not an absolute, nor a cultural universal, and is
somewhere on a continuum. Why it starts with anger, I am unsure, but we are
informed about how to deal with someone who is angry, as if it were a disorder,
but its useful information. Anger, jealousy, delusions, all such signs are
elaborated on so that the reader may follow them into the various conditions of
which they may be a feature. So Jealousy may reflect on some paranoia, or
dementia, or erotomania.

Each segment starts with a person
talking in the second person, a little vignette that sets the scene for the
discussion that follows. So for antisocial behaviour, we are listening to
someone chatting to a felon released from prison, with a sense of entitlement
and lots of victim blaming. Anxiety is a commentary on someone whose
daughter’s wedding coming up soon evokes an exacerbation of their natural
tendency to fret, a lot of worrying and some pretty sad sobbing. Anxiety is
passed off as a mental illness immediately, and, quite correctly, as being part
and parcel of most disorders, but not in this book as a perfectly normal
phenomenon which in evolutionary terms has kept us alive for millennia.
Further, his advice on ways to avoid anxiety by breathing or relaxing is no
longer considered state of the art, and is hard to reconcile with modern views
on the subject. The advice on medication is wise enough, but no mention of the
long-term effects of using antidepressants or the problems in getting off the
stuff, rebound anxiety and so on. Nowhere do we see what the Barlow NIMH
studies found out, or the value of psychotherapy; he is an MD after all, so his
focus is elsewhere.

Appetite however is regarded as one
of the more human drives, although anxiety didn’t fare so well. Avoidance gets
its own chapter, related more to personality than to avoidance of anxiety, and the
body image vignette is somewhat unimpressive, and a mother who watches her
teenage daughter fiddling with a hair iron, and a zit on the face, would
probably seek help after reading this vignette, and its assertion about
irrational preoccupations with appearance.

The compulsive section is better;
the confusion section is, well, confusing. Cravings, deceitfulness, delusions,
denial, depression, dissociation, euphoria and fatigue all follow in their
turn. While on the subject of dissociation, he handles this controversial and
contentious set of issues well, with a passing reference to psychodynamic
theory: 'The use of hypnosis or anxiolytic medications may help the therapist
to uncover the psychological conflict or trauma that caused the symptoms. Once
the conflict is made explicit, the symptoms promptly resolve' (page 110). This
is perhaps a little contentious in itself.

Fears, flashbacks and grandiosity
are next, followed by grief. This last is done well, with lots of sensible
advice, and I wish some of the GP’s around my area would understand the limits
of antidepressants in such applications.

Jealousy is an interesting, later
one, as are learning disorders. Physical complaints and pain are made
contentious with the inclusion of premenstrual dysphoric disorder, something
feminists are likely to be fed up with by now, and still petition against. Hicks
notes dissociative identity disorder as a contentious issue, but this one slips
under the radar. A lot of the statements appear to reflect on his own
practice, and his own views, which is fair enough, but as the saying goes 'a
little knowledge can be a dangerous thing' and I am unsure what the
ramifications there might be for the impressionable. The extent of the
discussions appears random, driven by his whim really, and not by what people
might need to know. So he discusses antipsychotic medication but not ECT, and
avoids the topic, although we hear about the long-acting Risperidone. Many of
the newer medications can cause weight gain and sedation he notes, but not that
the big culprits are olanzapine and clozapine, about which latter drug he
rightfully waxes a little lyrical. Although he talks about TD, and asserts
that all of the drugs with the exception of clozapine can do this, he neglects
the accepted fact that quetiapine doesn’t, although it is sedating. Many of
these drugs have been implicated in contentious studies about the risks of
death in the elderly, indeed those embarking on clozapine can be at risk of
heart failure, and so I am not sure about his choices on what to leave in, or
leave out. I am slightly perplexed by this lack of information, as I am sure
he knows all of this, and chooses his market in some way unknown to the
reviewer.

Self injurious behavior is dealt
with in the usual way, no mention of stress disorder and the like, although he
refers in passing that so many who engage in this behavior have been sexually
abused. As with dissociation, the reference frame is that of psychodynamics,
rather than of neurological substrate.

In any event this compendium
reflects a somewhat traditional approach to psychiatry, not so much a more
modern, neuroscientifically based and biopsychosocial approach, so one has sign
x because of the illness y, and there is little respect for the audience,
whatever that might be, that these are illnesses decided on by committees, with
global acceptance despite the lack of evidence, and that the variance within
diagnostic categories is often greater than that found between actual
categories. I am concerned that this book may mislead rather than inform the
layman, and create anxieties about someone on the extreme end of the continuum
of normal behaviour. We have medicalised so much of human behaviour, and I
remain unsure whether this book adds or detracts from that situation. I leave
the reader to decide, and perhaps this book goes next to the Reader’s Digest,
not the DSM-IV-TR.

A recent post on the Yahoo
Psychiatry Groups newsletter spoke of finally adding Symptom Deficit Sydrome,
in response to a patient who protests that they are normal, and solidly so
despite the evidence to the contrary, only just tongue in cheek.

Welcome to MHN's unique book review site Metapsychology.
We feature over 7800 in-depth reviews of a wide range of books and DVDs written by our reviewers from many backgrounds and
perspectives.
We update our front page weekly and add more than thirty new reviews each month. Our editor is Christian Perring, PhD. To contact him, use one of the forms available here.

Metapsychology Online reviewers normally receive gratis review copies of the items they review. Metapsychology Online receives a commission from Amazon.com for purchases through this site, which helps us send
review copies to reviewers. Please support us by making your Amazon.com purchases through our Amazon links. We thank
you for your support!