On 14/12/2010 08:35, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> On 12/14/10 03:13, John Smith wrote:
>> I would like to formally propose that Monad become a subclass of
>> Applicative, with a call for consensus by 1 February. The change is
>> described on the wiki at
>>http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Functor-Applicative-Monad_Proposal,>> That page isn't written as a proposal yet, it's written as a bunch of
> ideas. I would be happy to see something along the lines of Bas van
> Dijk's work
>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.libraries/14740 .
This is a proposal with far-reaching consequences, and with several
alternative designs. I'm not sure I understand all the tradeoffs. Some
parts of the proposal are orthogonal to the rest (e.g. changing fmap to
map), and should probably be considered separately.
Could someone please write a detailed proposal, enumerating all the pros
and cons, and the rationale for this design compared to other designs?
Cheers,
Simon