Does the Departure of Rex Tillerson Signal the End for the Nuclear Deal With Iran?

James Dobbins | Senior fellow and distinguished chair in diplomacy and security at the Rand Corporation, former U.S. assistant secretary of state for European affairs, former envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson seems to have carried little influence with President Donald Trump, so his departure may have little impact. Michael Pompeo, Tillerson’s replacement, seems to have generally respected his professional staff at the CIA, and accepted their considered assessments, including that Iran is adhering to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the nuclear deal with Iran. It is premature to conclude that Pompeo will disregard the cautionary advice he will receive from his new staff at the State Department. North Korea is a much more serious threat than Iran and also a more pressing problem, one likely to dominate Pompeo’s attention from his first day in his new posting, if not before. However much Pompeo may share Trump’s view that the Iran nuclear agreement is “the worse deal ever,” he will be urged not to advocate loosening the restraints on Iran even while seeking to negotiate what will inevitably be less effective ones on North Korea.

Paul R. Pillar | Nonresident senior fellow at the Center for Security Studies, Georgetown University, served in the Central Intelligence Agency from 1977 to 2005, author of Why America Misunderstands the World.

One of the strongest of President Donald Trump’s urges in foreign policy has been to destroy the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the nuclear deal with Iran. So far he has been restrained from doing so only by appeals from some senior advisers, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who recognized that such destruction would not serve U.S. interests or the interests of nuclear nonproliferation. Tillerson’s ouster—with Trump publicly singling out policy toward the JCPOA as a point of disagreement—opens the way for Trump to act on his destructive urge.

In Mike Pompeo, Trump will have a new secretary of state who will feed rather than restrain that urge. Like Trump, Pompeo has a visceral dislike for the JCPOA, rooted in a desire to undo anything former president Barack Obama accomplished.

U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA does not automatically preclude continuation of some version of the agreement among the other six parties. But the long arm of the U.S. Treasury will discourage European investment and trade with Iran, which may mean that Iran will not see enough economic benefit to make continuation of the agreement seem worthwhile. Iranian officials already have said that if the U.S. leaves the JCPOA, so too will Iran.

Robert Malley | President and CEO of the International Crisis Group, former White House coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa, and the Gulf region during the Obama administration

Two months are an exhausting eternity in the Trump era, but for now most everything points to a U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the nuclear deal with Iran, by May 12. Even before Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s replacement by Mike Pompeo, reasons abounded to feel this way, from the administration’s fixation on Iran to President Donald Trump’s obsession with undoing his predecessor’s legacy. But Tillerson’s ouster, Pompeo’s opposition to the deal, and Trump’s claim that differences regarding Iran motivated the change, are the clearest indications to date that the JCPOA’s fate hangs by a thread.

Europe holds keys to avoid a U.S. withdrawal or, should it occur, limit its damage. As it negotiates with Washington, Europe should be prepared to take steps that address U.S. concerns, but only if those are fully consistent with the JCPOA and only if in exchange the U.S. agrees to genuinely fulfill its economic obligations vis-à-vis Tehran. Barring that unlikely outcome, Europe should pivot to Plan B: It should seek to persuade Tehran to comply with its obligations, notwithstanding a U.S. withdrawal, by shoring up the political and economic benefits of bilateral ties between the European Union and Iran, which would be lost if Iran disregarded its commitments. In particular, Europe should try to minimize the harm caused to its businesses by secondary U.S. sanctions, invest in Iran’s economy and seek an energy partnership with Tehran. None of this will be easy—but all would be preferable to a renewed nuclear crisis and attendant regional escalation.

Richard Goldberg | Senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies

President Donald Trump wasn’t bluffing when he threatened to leave the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) unless Europe agreed to fix the flawed nuclear deal with Iran. The appointment of Mike Pompeo as secretary of state should remove any doubt about that. Pompeo’s appointment signals that Trump is serious about bringing back America’s toughest economic sanctions, including sanctions targeting the Central Bank of Iran, unless Europe agrees to eliminate the deal’s sunset clauses, demand intrusive inspections of Iranian military sites, and tie a snapback of sanctions to any further Iranian development of nuclear-capable missiles. Pompeo’s appointment delivered a strong message to European diplomats who thought they could sweet talk Secretary of State Rex Tillerson into keeping the deal. Like Trump, Pompeo will be clear-eyed about Iran’s expanding illicit and destabilizing activities throughout the Middle East, and he will be a strong voice for rolling Iran back whenever and wherever possible.

Gary Samore | Executive director for research at Harvard University’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, former member of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (2015–2017), former White House coordinator for arms control and weapons of mass destruction under president Barack Obama, and former special assistant and senior director for nonproliferation and export controls under president Bill Clinton

The nomination of CIA Director Mike Pompeo to replace Rex Tillerson as secretary of state clearly increases the likelihood that President Donald Trump will decide to withdraw the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or the Iran nuclear deal, on May 12, the deadline for waiving U.S. sanctions under the JCPOA. However, the U.S. and its European allies that are party to the JCPOA (the European Union, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France) are continuing to negotiate on the president’s demand that Europe agree to join the U.S. in seeking to “fix the flaws” in the JCPOA, specifically imposing sanctions on long-range missile development, strengthening inspections at military facilities, and eliminating the sunset clauses in the JCPOA.

Reportedly, the negotiators are making progress, but remain far apart on the sunset issue because the Europeans believe that any effort to end or modify the time bound limits on Iran’s nuclear program will lead to a collapse of the JCPOA. If Washington and the European capitals reach a compromise by May 12, Trump is likely to waive U.S. sanctions against Iran for another 120 days, although he may threaten not to issue another waiver unless the other parties to the JCPOA (Russia, China, and Iran) accept the proposed fixes. If Trump is unsatisfied with the proposal offered by the Europeans, then Pompeo, the new secretary of state, is likely to recommend that the U.S. withdraw from the JCPOA, which Trump is likely to do.

Trump's foreign policy is a disaster because he is a disaster as a person he lies all the time and contradicts himself all the time his dismissal of his secretary of state who was a moderate voice before he was retired and the hawks he replaced from his previous foreign policy advisors is a indiction he might be one of the worst presidents we have ever had

Comment Policy

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.