mina-dev mailing list archives

On Jun 29, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Samuel Doyle wrote:
> Any way I can make it so that I don't have to add every specific
> instance of a message I want to encode to the types list in my
> encoder?
>
> I would basically just like a base class and have that as the only
> type in my encoder types.
Sorry for the delay, I was traveling back to NYC from Dublin :)
You're using the DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory?
I'd recommend just making your own factory that has the logic that
you want.
-pete
--
proyal@apache.org - http://fotap.org/~osi