while I was aware that there had been a letter it didn't occur to me that it was a ransom note.(i use to be blond)lol. let's see now we have a ransom note and a telephone call consistent with faulkner's pmi of Feb16-18th and none of this was heard by the jury......how many other things do we know the jury didn't hear that may have made a difference in the verdict?
Taken together is that enough for reversable error?.I know it definitely raises a third party culpulbility......hmmm i think i'm going to start a list of things that didn't make it to trial..