Hi Filip,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:44:04PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> Fairly late to get into this discussion but I'll air my thoughts anyway.
Feel free :)
> Actually I have run into issues with 2.1+BDB on a SuSE system, on reiserfs.
> And more people have, apparently, to the point where they have documented
> how to reconfigure to use ldbm:
> http://sdb.suse.de/en/sdb/html/rsimai_slox_ldap.html
That's funny. LDBM is by default actually using Berkeley DB for storing
the data adding just another layer.
> So I'd suggest significant testing on Debian, to see whether it is a general
> problem with bdb & those filesystems or SuSE specific, and stick to ldbm by
> as the default until we're sure it is no problem with us.
Yep, automatic testing of the database backend is another thing on my
todo. Stuffing some 100MBs into the directory and doing some stress
testing.
Greetings
Torsten