in this case I was attacked for not being able to recognize a logical argument. the best response to that is showing an objective example that I am, in fact, able to reason logically. since I have not taken an IQ test recently, I point to the lsat.

redemption

there is nothing about being impressed by a score that implies you must think that the score has certain other interpretations. I'm not impressed by anybody's lsat. but it is an OBJECTIVE measure of logical reasoning.

what logic do I need to display? I asked how the "history of victimhood" reasoning for AA would account to the boost that would be given to a 2nd generation African-American whose parents emigrated from Nigeria more than a 2nd generation Vietnamese-American. I recieved an ad-hom response.