I've sometime suspected that, when eventually elaborated, the
self-congratulatory complexity and "sophistication" of human mechanisms of
cognition/consciousness would be found to arise out of humblingly
unsophisticated brute force computational capabilities of bulk assemblages
of neurons.

By the most fortunate accident, the researchers whose work is the subject
of the above article, may have stumbled upon--perhaps "reinvented"--a basic
mechanism of human linguistic ability--or something fruitfully close to
it--and by doing so brought us one large step closer to understanding the
basic, elegantly humble architecture of mind--one large step closer to
assembling the suite of "meta-neuronal" mechanisms that will eventually
lead to AI.

The beauty--the delicious irony of this for me--is that they achieved what
they did not by seeking complexity but, quite the contrary, by seeking--and
finding--a sort of moronically-simplistic, number-crunch,
statistical-database-sort-of blunt instrument. I'm reminded of the ancient
shao-lin lesson: "Imagine, grasshopper, the sound of one ego deflating."

And of course the words of the bard:

"What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite in
faculty, in form and moving how express and admirable, in action how like
an angel, in apprehension how like a god-the beauty of the world, the
paragon of animals!"