Follow Blog via Email

The Arizona law designed to protect religious freedoms, is under attack by leftist extremists that hate freedoms. Leftist only believe in equality, not liberty, there is a huge difference. By taking away religious freedoms, the leftist extremists thinks that will make us more equal. We are all equal, but the leftist activist’s does not allow liberty to thrive with equality. People of conscience are denied liberty on how they to decide to run their businesses. The Government will now decide how you will run your business, under penalty of Intolerance.

No One Is Dictating Who You Can Love!

Only The Intolerant Leftists Are Saying That!

The NFL? Really? The NFL??? How far has leftism encroached onto society?

The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and freedom of expression, no matter if you don’t like it. Suppose the government forces you to listen to Islamic hatred about gays, Jews and Christians? Suppose the government forces you to participate in gay marriages, and watch them engage in sexual acts? Suppose the government forces your children to be taught about the joys of anal and oral sex? Without learning the consequences of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Is that what you want? You won’t have a choice! The government will mandate these laws as “Social Justice” and a reconciliation to the past perceived injustices. Injustices that have been long ago been exposed and reconciled. However, that’s not enough for the liberal extremists. They want more of your freedoms. So much so, they will take your existing freedoms away. They call it, ‘Progressiveness’!

If someone comes into my business and wants to buy my cakes and flowers, there is no problem! If someone wants me to participate in baking a cake to Satan, the government will now force me to comply. If I don’t, the government will jail me and put me out of business. So I have to expose my family and my children to immorality, to comply with the law of immoral politicians. I am not equating homosexuality with either atheism or satanism. I am just using this as an example of the extremist position being foisted upon the people. The point is; no one is as intolerant as the leftist extremist that uses absurdity to create laws in an atmosphere of fear. The Arizona law is trying to protect people from this absurdity.

That’s not what the First Amendment is about. Freedom of conscience, and freedom of speech, is not just a one way street. Freedom of expression is not limited to a select few. Freedom of choice is not to be regulated by the government. COMMON SENSE, used to be a reasonable way and to make good decisions that benefited everyone. The Constitution is the LAW of the LAND. The Constitution is the Supreme Law. It is fundamentally based on the laws of freedom: The Magna Carta. The Freedom of Natural Law. The Rights of Human Liberty. From liberty and freedom, comes equality. It is the end result we all desire!

If the bakery, and the florist, don’t want to participate in your gay wedding: CHOOSE ANOTHER! MOVE ON!

Taking people to court and suing them only demonstrates yourintolerance for others. Enjoy your cake and flowers. When the real forces of intolerance comes for you, you’d better hope we, the ‘tolerant one’s’, still have the faith in God to help you.

Niemöller, said it best: When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.

The Intolerant Godless Leftist are setting the stage, and you are all being played upon it. Wake up! Before it’s too late.

Like this:

What the heck are the Hawai’i Public [or rather Pubic] Teachers thinking? A new sex education program being introduced called “Pono Choices” gets into explicit sexual activity. To the point of actually describing certain sexual acts in graphic detail. The program is targeted at middle school children ages 11 through 13. This 10 hour program has been taught to about 1,700 middle school students at a cost of $800,000 as a pilot program. One state legislator has concerns about the programs content.

“Pono”, in the Hawaiian language means: goodness, uprightness, morality, of moral being. Of course, we all know the definition of porno, but is this curriculum’s content seems inappropriate for middle school children of 11 to 13 years of age?

State Rep. Bob McDermott, whose eight children are enrolled in Hawai’i’s public schools, doesn’t want his children exposed to a controversial taxpayer-funded sex education program. He believes parents should have the say in a subject matter that goes outside the normal education curriculum of reading, writing and math.

McDermott said the program is “medically inaccurate” and not biology based, and that it teaches children about topics such as anal sex, sex with multiple partners and how to put on a condom — using a cucumber or wooden replica of a penis.

“The program normalizes a homosexual lifestyle and anal sex, while failing to warn students of the extreme dangers of anal sex; it references multiple sex partners, while failing to inform students about the health benefits of monogamy; it fails to warn students about the ineffectiveness of condoms against HPV, herpes, and anal sex; and fails to educate students on the stages of human reproduction,” McDermott said, providing Hawaii Reporter with an early copy of his report.

“Any talk of anal sex — which the curriculum does frequently — is instinctively repulsive for pre-pubescent children. Additionally, calling the anus a genital — as Pono Choices does — is just plain medically wrong,” McDermott said.

I wrote to the Hawai’i State legislature asking what are they doing about this, I got a two replies from some lawmakers:

Senator Russell Ruderman’s reply to me was less than enthusiastic, saying that he didn’t believe the program was that extreme as worded, and that he will be watchful of what’s presented to kids in school. He doesn’t believe, which means he doesn’t know.

I got the impression from Mr. Ruderman’s reply to me was to go pound sand. Then again, Ruderman is an extremist liberal who would probably welcome child sexual tourism in Hawai’i.

Being in the media, I am writing about the program and talking about it on my radio show, but believe it or not, most lawmakers are ignoring the issue, and the DOE continues to push the agenda.

Last night there was a parent meeting at the capitol and there were several hundred people in attendance, so we will see what comes out of it.

But the board of education is appointed by the governor and the governor, as far as i know, is in support.

We will continue to shine the light on what is happening and hope the parents will take it from here.

Tolerance vs. intolerance – pedophile tourism – sexual tourism – its common place in countries like Thailand and in some Islamic countries where sexual predators can marry children as young as 9 years old. Is this the future of Hawai’i tourism? Educating children to be tolerant and accepting of dangerous sexual activity, is that the new norm for sexual education?

I don’t know if Mr. Ruderman has any children in middle school being taught this curriculum, but Mr. McDermott may and I’m sure he’s familiar with some of the material being taught.

This story has gotten the attention of other media outlets in Hawai’i. Civil Beat is an online news media outlet that has also followed the story. Civil beat reporter Alia Wong reports that both Rep. McDermott and Senator Sam Slom have accused the Department of Education of stonewalling them from getting any information about the controversial program.

The DOE states that anyone wanting to learn about the material, which was also developed jointly by the University of Hawai’i at Manoa and the DOE, said they would be willing to have a professional discuss the curriculum material.

The course material includes a teacher’s handbook, a student workbook and a digital presentation; however, the DOE has refused to hand over the information. Both Sen. Slom and Rep. McDermott refused the DOE and University’s offer.

But why wouldn’t the UH and DOE allow the lawmakers the opportunity to review the materials for themselves? That doesn’t make sense to me unless the material did include some material that would be objectionable to some parents. It’s the job of the legislature to provide oversight for such things, especially since the DOE is now appointed by the governor.

As the DOE describes Pono Choices; it is described as a medically accurate teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention program for kids in grades six through eight. It was developed specifically for children in Hawaii by UH Manoa’s Center on Disability Studies through funding from the federal Office of Adolescent Health. The two-week review, according to the DOE, concluded that Pono Choices is indeed appropriate for schools.

Controversy surrounding Pono Choices — which is already being used at 12 public schools and could soon be adopted by another eight — emerged when opponents of same-sex marriage claimed its legalization would force schools to teach about the “homosexual lifestyle.” Slom, during a special session floor speech, brandished a Pono Choices workbook to argue that the DOE is already teaching kids that gay relationships and sex are appropriate.

There has been a push by liberal extremists to take parental control away from the family. Educators and liberals have maintained that they should assume the parental role because they believe they know what’s best for the child. Never mind that the parents’ values and religious objections to such material may be offensive to them. However, liberals don’t believe in individual rights, parental rights, or any rights. They believe that all rights come from the government and will be allowed by their approval.

In addressing criticism of the Common Core national education standards, a panelist at the Center for American Progress (CAP), a liberal think tank, said critics were a “tiny minority” who opposed standards altogether, which was unfair because “the children belong to all of us.”

Get that parents? You are a “tiny minority” to these big government people, and your children are not really yours. They belong to the state.

However, the larger picture may be missing here. Whenever the state claim ownership of your children, it should ring the alarms to any parent. History has shown abusive governments have been using children to do the states bidding. Hitler did that with his youth corps and so did Stalin, they encouraged children to turn in their parents if they disagreed with the states policies. Today in some Islamic countries they are using their children as human shields and even strapping bombs on them as future martyrs for jihad. We know they have used the mentally disabled as human bombs. Breeding the next generations of terrorism.

Conclusion: There has been a long pattern emerging, now with greater veracity by liberals to push an agenda of anti-American traditional values. Progressive liberals have been chipping away at American values of morality and goodness for years. Groups that used to provided moral guidance for boys and girls, are now given the seal of progressive liberal approval of immoral tolerance. Teachers should be educating children on how to balance a checkbook and not how to place condoms on a bananas. That should be left to the parents to decide what sexual education meets their religious and moral values, not the state.

Liberals will argue that promiscuity will be rampant among children without their guidance. However, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases will spread without liberal guidance anyway. Nothing will stop neither natures desires nor the raging hormones of some pimply teenager. Having some central planing educator introducing a melange of sexual choices at middle school ages is like grabbing a handful of prescription jellybeans drugs, and saying try these, and ignore your parents. Then they can eventually go to college and become a professor of leisure studies. Some future prospects to consider.

The Boy Scouts now allow gay members and leaders. The Girl Scouts now sell abortions along with cookies. Grassroots groups like the Tea Party have been trying to take back the letter of the United States Constitution: Individualism, liberty and freedoms. But the progressives liberals are taking your rights away for government dependencies, selfishness and entitlements. It’s an government proscription for addiction that once hooked, it cannot be changed. We’ve seen this before in history, and it has never turned out well.

It has been very troubling lately reading the commentary on the internet news websites like Civil Beat. Whenever there is a post, and a [less than civil] discussion about farming and ranching, there is an immediate hostility towards those that are farmers.

It is almost rabid, with the environmentalist, and anti-corporate liberal activists haters, leading the charge with hateful misinformation. They have found an easy target to attack; the very people that supply us with our food source. The people that work the land and grow crops for sale in the markets, they are now accused of poisoning our food supply. Deliberately!

In reality, the liberals hate agriculture corporations like Monsanto. Obama placed Monsanto executives in the Food and Drug Agency (FDA). So the liberal activists take out their anger on the farmer. They lobby politicians to pass laws preventing farmers from using the tools farmers need to provide the grocery stores with the food safety we all take for granite. They point their finger at farmers and accuse them of poisoning people. It is simply not true! Just like one of Obama’s many lies, the liberal activist’s, use fear and intimidation to attack generations of Hawaiian farmers that have been genuine stewards of the ‘Aina! (land)

Haole Liberal Activist Pointing Finger

It is absurd and beyond belief, but liberals are campaigning on a narrative of hate and fear to demonize Hawaiian farmers. Accusing them of deliberately poisoning people. They have no proof of any Hawaiian farmer poisoning the food supply, so the liberal activists make up false stories to scare people into believing this hoax!

Politicians and environmentalist have found a boogy-strawman argument regarding the techniques to modern day farming.

These ignorant people are going to destroy an industry because of their hatred of corporations. We will see the price of food increase, all because of fear mongering and ignorance. Thank a liberal for your higher food prices.

So Be It Then

Get back To Me

Challenged by modern society about exactly what his role is in the world, a lone farmer mounts a defence based on one phrase: “Get back to me.”

Once those chains are shackled upon us, there is no turning back

The late Paul Harvey had the insight to see many things into the future. The use of drugs in America, the moral decline in America, and the attacks on farmers in America. We are destroying our future by listening to people that think they know better than the rest of us. They are called progressives. Democrats and Socialists. They are the Nanny State America.

And on the 8th day, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, “I need a caretaker.” So God made a farmer.

God said, “I need somebody willing to get up before dawn, milk cows, work all day in the fields, milk cows again, eat supper and then go to town and stay past midnight at a meeting of the school board.” So God made a farmer.

“I need somebody with arms strong enough to rustle a calf and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild. Somebody to call hogs, tame cantankerous machinery, come home hungry, have to wait lunch until his wife’s done feeding visiting ladies and tell the ladies to be sure and come back real soon — and mean it.” So God made a farmer.

God said, “I need somebody willing to sit up all night with a newborn colt. And watch it die. Then dry his eyes and say, ‘Maybe next year.’ I need somebody who can shape an ax handle from a persimmon sprout, shoe a horse with a hunk of car tire, who can make harness out of haywire, feed sacks and shoe scraps. And who, planting time and harvest season, will finish his forty-hour week by Tuesday noon, then, pain’n from ‘tractor back,’ put in another seventy-two hours.” So God made a farmer.

God had to have somebody willing to ride the ruts at double speed to get the hay in ahead of the rain clouds and yet stop in mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor’s place. So God made a farmer.

God said, “I need somebody strong enough to clear trees and heave bails, yet gentle enough to tame lambs and wean pigs and tend the pink-combed pullets, who will stop his mower for an hour to splint the broken leg of a meadow lark. It had to be somebody who’d plow deep and straight and not cut corners. Somebody to seed, weed, feed, breed and rake and disc and plow and plant and tie the fleece and strain the milk and replenish the self-feeder and finish a hard week’s work with a five-mile drive to church.

“Somebody who’d bale a family together with the soft strong bonds of sharing, who would laugh and then sigh, and then reply, with smiling eyes, when his son says he wants to spend his life ‘doing what dad does.'” So God made a farmer.

Politicians selling “ism’s”

Organics sell a utopia of healthy living, but they never tell you that they use more pesticides and poisons on their products.

Organic Poisoning Is Real

What’s For Dinner?

The Fruits Of Our Labor

Like this:

It seems Americans are accepting of the rules and regulations that come with the so called Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. Otherwise, there would be a firestorm of complaints and outrage, but where is it? If there is outrage over the denial of medical care because of Obamacare, then I’m not seeing it in either the media, the public or anywhere else. Except, of course, among conservative bloggers and commentators.

Remember last year when that the little girl that needed a new set of lungs, but was denied because she was too young? So, age discrimination is apart of the rules and regulations built into Obamacare. What other discrimination’s can we expect to find? The Obama regime keeps changing the rules and no one seems to care. Let’s remind ourselves of what the HHS Secretary said back then:

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said today that “someone lives and someone dies” when asked to waive a regulation that stands in the way of Sarah Murnaghan, a 10-year-old girl, from receiving an adult lung that will save her life.

“Well, I would suggest sir- that again- that this is an incredibly agonizing situation where someone lives and someone dies,” says Sebelius.

Without the transplant, Sarah has an estimated three to five weeks to live. Sebelius has the power to waive the federal regulation and help the girl. (Sebelius makes the comment around 2:13 in.)

That’s a pretty cold and callus response by Sebelius, and the Obama regime stood by her decision to deny care to a desperate little girl. Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa, begged Sebelius to wave the rules to help this little girl. Are we now at the mercy of our elected representatives to beg for our healthcare needs? A judge finally had to order Sebelius to wave the rules and allow Sarah Murnaghan the transplant she needed. The transplant was successful and her prognosis will allow her a full life expectancy.

Secretary’s refusal to set aside the Under 12 Rule to protect the very few children nationally who are subject to it, despite evidence showing that the Rule discriminates against children and serves no purpose, is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.

Is this how Obamacare is supposed to work? Is Obamacare in actuality, denied care? It seems that is the case, and it also seems the most vulnerable in our society will be the victims of this national healthcare nightmare. The very young, the elderly and the very sick are routinely being denied care. It is rationed care, make no mistake about it.

Remember that Obama promised that his healthcare plan will prevent insurance companies from dropping people’s coverage when they get sick. But that’s what’s happening!

Guy Benson, a conservative writer at Townhall magazine, has been following this story and others around the country:

Of the 125 appeals they’ve filed on behalf of young patients so far, fewer than 20 percent have received a response, and nearly half of those were denials.

In addition to being denied healthcare, people are seeing their healthcare insurance premiums increase. Remember that Obama said your insurance rates would go down. That’s isn’t happening. I’m guessing that’s what democrats and progressives had in mind when they wrote the 2,000+ page law. Deceptively named, the “Affordable Care Act“, Obamacare is just the opposite of affordable, for both patient and doctor. That is the nature of progressivism, it is always the opposite of what it is named for. But don’t be confused by the term “progressive”, it is who democrats are. It’s just another rebranding of their political philosophy. They say they are the party of the little guy, but their actions make the little guy littler. Progressives love to control and shape society into their vision of utopia; unfortunately, that vision is getting people killed.

Let’s review: people that refer to themselves as democrats, are actually progressives, and progressives are socialists. It sounds confusing, but when you listen to their political philosophy, you’ll hear it in their proposals and solutions to societies problems. They use flowery names like, “affordable” and “care”, to convince people they know what’s best for your needs. However, when progressives implement their ideas as policy, the opposite effect is always the case. Promising people free stuff is always enticing, and it’s all paid for by your government! Who could resist that idea?

Obama, a ueber progressive, swore up and down that insurance premiums would go down. Obama swore that if you liked your healthcare plan and your doctor, you can keep them, PERIOD! We know know that was all a lie! But where is the outrage? Crickets! Just like Obama’s other scandals, people don’t seem to want to care. I suppose being lied to is now acceptable to most Americans, until it begins to affect them. Wait till the employer mandate kick in.

Watch what happens when employees learn about losing their healthcare because of Obamacare. Listen to how more expensive their new healthcare plans will cost. Learn how their jobs are in jeopardy because of Obamacare’s progressive policies. Read it here!

OK, so you might be asking, what do conservatives have as the alternative to the destructive progressive policies? We offer plenty of solutions; starting by getting government out of the way. Obamacare puts a government bureaucrat between you and your doctor. Conservatives want to remove that barrier. Conservatives want you to keep more of the money you earn, so that you can spend it the way you want. The progressive philosophy says, no, government knows what’s best for you.

Conservatives want health insurance to be allowed to be purchased across state lines. Allowed the employee to take their coverage with them when that change jobs. Shop for the best coverage that they want, not dictated by some government bureaucrat. Conservatives have lots of ideas to help with healthcare, we call them free market ideas.

Conservatives want businesses to grow and profit. Progressives want to regulate businesses and decide which business will profit and which ones will be regulated. That’s the description of crony capitalism. It is the progressive perversion of capitalism. Conservatives want capitalism unfettered to grow and profit, progressives want to regulate and demonize profits. Progressives have no problem giving away other people money to corporations that agree with their causes. Environmentalism is one such cause that progressives embrace. Remember all the Green Projects that Obama pumped Trillions of dollars into? That’s your money they used to try and manipulate the green energy market. It failed miserably and lots of people lost jobs and money. That’s crony capitalism.

Conservatives are the real environmentalist. Progressives are the opposite of environmentalism. Environmental groups like the criminal organization “Sierra Club” are not for the environment, they are for regulating businesses out of business. The name conservative means to conserve; conserving the environment, conserving your savings, conserving your freedoms, conserving your liberty, conserving the United States Constitution. We conservatives don’t have to rebrand ourselves into cutesy names like progressives need to do. Conservatives keep their promises, whereas progressives use promises to get what they want, and to hell with everyone else. Why else would progressives want to regulate the health care industry, but to control your access to healthcare providers, i.e. Doctors. Conservatives want the traditional relationship between the doctor and patient, without some progressive government bureaucrat deciding if you are worthy of healthcare. Remember when Alaska Governor, and former Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin was excoriated by progressives by suggesting that Obamacare would be regulated by government “Death Panels”? She Was Right! There’s is no denying that!

Remember when conservative Senator Ted Cruz filibustered in the Senate against Obamacare? The progressives then decided it was in their political advantage to shutdown the government and then blame it on the republicans. Senator Ted Cruz knew what was coming, he tried to warn people, but progressives along with their corrupt media allies blamed the government shutdown on the republicans. The republican leadership, or lack thereof, didn’t have the principles to stand up and fight. Who loses? We all do.

True conservatives are for limited government, less regulations and more individual liberties. Freedom is not free, it comes with a price. Which is why we need a strong military to defend our freedoms. Conservatives understand that purpose of the governments role and responsibilities, but progressives abhor that and want to government to control your life, because they believe they know what’s best for you. It seems Americans agree with that philosophy. Americans have been giving up their freedoms for promises of free healthcare, free retirement, free housing; all the promises of Social Justice that progressives campaign on.

Americans are being wooed with the progressive promise of income equality. Progressives claim that corporations are making huge sums of money at your expense. Yet, progressives cozy up to ultra rich Hollywood types and sports athletes that make millions of dollars. Yet, these progressive allies offer little in jobs and advancement for the average American struggling to pay their bills. Progressive demonize corporate executives salaries saying they are being paid too much, yet the progressives get rich through crony capitalism at your expense. Corporations that offer jobs and upward mobility, a career path to success and the American dream. Progressives want to keep the American people on the government plantation where they can dictate what job you can have, what healthcare you’ll receive, and what freedoms you’ll lose. We’re losing our freedoms before our eyes, and people are blinded by progressive shiny objects. A heartless government, run by heartless progressives.