Comments on: Should Non-Citizens Have Concealed Carry Permits in South Dakota? Lawsuit May Decide Questionhttp://www.gundigest.com/gun-rights/should-non-citizens-have-concealed-carry-permits-in-south-dakota-lawsuit-may-decide-question
Expert advice from the world's leading authorities on gun values, gun prices, gun history, gunsmithing, shooting and tactical gearThu, 08 Dec 2016 16:32:07 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.4By: dhghttp://www.gundigest.com/gun-rights/should-non-citizens-have-concealed-carry-permits-in-south-dakota-lawsuit-may-decide-question#comment-221
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:30:45 +0000http://www.gundigest.com/?p=46001#comment-221Since when did the Bill of Rights or the Constitution state the rights of “residents” or “inhabitants”? To my knowledge, the Bill of Rights (including the 2nd amendment) were written for CITIZENS, legal citizens, of the United States of America. And in my judgement any other interpretation is a violation of the Laws of this nation and a bastardization of what our founding fathers composed and ratified as the laws of this nation. I don’t care what some liberal/socialist anti-sovereignty fecal track says whether they are a citizen, resident, elected official, or even Supreme Court Justice. Those elected to “serve” as representatives of the true citizens of the USA and those appointed as judges and/or Justices have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution including the Bill of Rights. To do otherwize is to negate their oath of office and borders on treason, high treason!
]]>