UNESCO's World Heritage Committee has summarily dismissed the Abbott government's bid to wind back protection of Tasmanian forests.

The committee meeting in Doha took just seven minutes to consider the bid, which member nation Portugal called "feeble", and setting an unacceptable precedent for the future.

Members of the Tasmanian Aboriginal community looking over forests in the Florentine Valley in southern Tasmania. Photo: Peter Mathew

No country spoke in favour of the bid to de-list 74,00 hectares of old-growth forest, which official cultural and natural values advisers told the meeting would weaken the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.

Advertisement

Colombia and Germany supported the recommendation to reject the de-listing, but only Portugal spoke at length to the meeting in a passionate defence of the World Heritage system.

"The justifications presented to the reduction are to say the least feeble," the Portuguese delegation said.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott said on Monday that the government was ''disappointed''.

''We’re disappointed with the decision but the application we made to remove from the boundaries of the world heritage listing areas of degraded forest areas of plantation timber we thought was self-evidently sensible. We will be carefully looking at the decision and deciding what’s best now,'' he told reporters in Canberra.

In a statement issued on Monday morning in response to the decision, Environment Minister Greg Hunt and the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Agriculture, Tasmanian Senator Richard Colbeck, said the government had honoured an election commitment by seeking the boundary change.

"The Committee has not approved the Australian government’s request. Australia accepts and will consider the decision of the World Heritage Committee,'' the statement said.

Greens Leader Christine Milne said on Monday that she was ''absolutely thrilled" by the decision.

"It is another case of the Abbott government humiliating Australia on the global stage. It clearly was a humiliation for Australia, and so it should have been, because it would have been a shocking precedent if governments can just fiddle with the boundaries of their world heritage areas, destroy outstanding universal values, just for cheap politics,'' Senator Milne told ABC TV.

Labor’s environment spokesman Mark Butler said the proposal should never have gone to the committee.

‘‘Australians do not support Tony Abbott’s ‘dig it up, chop it down’ attitude,’’ he said.

‘‘I’m tickled pink,’’ he said of the decision. He said he hoped that the government did not unilaterally withdraw from the world heritage framework.

‘‘It would be an appalling development if Australia set that precedent,’’ he said.

Environmental lobbyist Alec Marr, who was in Doha, said: “The World Heritage Committee saw through the deception of the Australian Government’s efforts here, and the high quality science and professionalism of the advisory bodies was exemplary.”

“Today is vindication for every Australian, and people around the world, who love Tasmania’s forests and want to see them protected,” Mr Marr said.

Also in Doha, Environment Tasmania spokesman Dr Phill Pullinger described the decision as ‘‘a great relief for the wild forests of the Great Western Tiers, Weld Valley, Butlers Gorge and the Upper Florentine Valley’’.

However, ‘‘much of Tasmania’s natural heritage remains at risk, with the Tasmanian Government aiming to turn vast areas of protected forest into logging zones’’, Dr Pullinger said.

‘‘The World Heritage Committee’s decision sends a clear message that the international community holds Tasmania’s forests in the highest regard,’’ he said.

Also part of the Doha delegation, Australian Conservation Foundation campaigner Jess Abrahams said the finding underlined the fact Tasmania’s forests were some of the most spectacular on earth and ‘‘the Southern Hemisphere’s equivalent of the Californian Redwoods’’.

The de-listing bid, one of few in UNESCO history, arose of out a 2013 election promise by the Abbott government to roll back a 170,000 hectare extension to the 1.5 million hectare Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.

The extension fulfilled a key plank of the peace deal struck by industry and green groups to end the generation-old Tasmanian forest conflict, and was guided through by former Labor environment minister Tony Burke.

Mr Burke, now Labor's finance spokesman, said on Tuesday: "The world heritage committee has confirmed the position that has always been held by Labor and by every Liberal Prime Minister except Tony Abbott: World heritage means protected forever."

After Liberal landslide wins in three of the five Tasmanian seats in the election, the government claimed a strong mandate to wind back the listing.

"We need to ensure that the great state of Tasmania is a strong economy as a well as a beautiful national park," Mr Abbott repeated as recently as last week.

The Parliamentary Secretary for Agriculture, Richard Colbeck, launched a campaign arguing that the listing of 74,000 hectares of forests made a mockery of World Heritage values because of previous logging.

But the federal Environment Department told a Senate inquiry into the de-listing bid that only four per cent of the 74,000 hectares had been heavily disturbed.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature advised the World Heritage committee that the wind back would be "clearly inappropriate", and diminished the wilderness' outstanding universal values.

Among areas targeted for de-listing was the bitterly disputed Upper Florentine Valley in central Tasmania.

A total of 150 hectares of its 7,000 hectares tall old growth forest was logged, and in its heart lies an ice age cave with ancient Aboriginal remains, part of the Tasmanian Wilderness' rare status as a combined cultural and natural World Heritage site.

The International Council on Monuments and Sites said the government had failed to make a convincing case to exclude areas with significant cultural attributes.

Lobbyists at the meeting said there appeared to be little evidence of Australian government lobbying for the wind-back, in contrast to concentrated effort last week to avoid the listing of the Great Barrier Reef as in danger.

"no country spoke in favour of the bid to de-list 74,00 ha. of old growth forest..."

"no country spoke in favour of the bid to de-list 74,00 ha. of old growth forest..."

186 comments

A victory for common sense. I wish we could take 7 minutes to dismiss Abbots other hairbrained plans, and the list is long.

Commenter

Innocent bystander

Location

Melbourne

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 5:04AM

Thankfully UNESCO can recognise the public advocacy of protecting the rarest and most precious commodity on Earth, pristine wilderness. What a pity we have to rely on the integrity and foresight of other nations to save us from our rapacious Federal Govnt

Commenter

KEEPITREAL

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 5:34AM

I agree, it hardly makes sense to pay some people to plant trees while allowing others to cut down fully grown ones.

Commenter

SteveH.

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 5:49AM

Shame on the Abbott Government for seeking this delisting. About time Greg Hunt put the environment first for a change.

Commenter

Flanders

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 6:18AM

Yes, one down - twenty to go (or thereabouts).

Commenter

Diane

Location

Sydney

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 6:29AM

'

I agree, it hardly makes sense to pay some people to plant trees while allowing others to cut down fully grown ones.'

Isn't that what happens in pine plantations ? You've missed the point about ecosystems, which are not replaced.

Commenter

adam

Location

yarrawonga

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 6:37AM

A Victory for the ill informed, those forests need selective logging or they become a mess. Humans stopping them from natural cycles by protecting them is stupid. We should not blanket log any forest but selective forest clearing is actually good for the forest. Its the reason forests in the USA and other places burn so hot an hard when a fire takes hold. Not to mention its destroying the Tasmanian economy ! Before you all start I don't want them destroyed but I think selective logging would be a good compromise this idea that loggers want to destroy forests is a Greeny Myth !!

Commenter

BigTedd

Location

Brisbane

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 6:39AM

Oh by the way its a pity some folks who probably have never been to Australia let alone Tasmania are making environmental and political decisions for everyone !

Commenter

BigTedd

Location

Brisbane

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 6:41AM

Well, looks like tasmanians need to pull their own weight now, more than ever before.

People of tasmania have to start making new jobs in other industries instead of demanding the rest of Australia pay for their welfare.

This is a victory alright- tasmanians need to create entirely new industries and that means getting seriously creative. One thing is for sure, I'll be opposing every attempt for tas to get more federal money from this point on.# You've done this to yourselves and now you need to reap the big nothing.

Commenter

Alex

Location

Finley

Date and time

June 24, 2014, 6:46AM

What you never understood, when this mob won the election and part of the IPA wish list was a smaller Coalition front bench, part of this wish has been provided, ministers taking more than one portfolio, some portfolios scrapped like science, the portfolio for environmental protection was renamed with this mandate, the new portfolio name is Environmental Destruction head by the Minister Hunt.