COVID-19 - Risk assessment dashboard

Gov. Jay Inslee and the state’s public health leaders consider many factors when making decisions related to the governor’s Safe Start reopening efforts and approval of county applications for reopening. This dashboard provides an overview of the key metrics and data used by state leaders to assess whether it’s safe for a county to enter a new phase of reopening.

Key metrics have been developed in each of the five risk assessment areas: COVID-19 activity, testing, healthcare system readiness, case investigations and contact tracing, and the protection of high risk populations. The metric goals are intended to be applied as targets, not hardline measures. The targets reflect recommendations from the Washington State Department of Health. They each contribute to reducing risk of disease transmission, and are to be considered in whole. Where one target is not fully achieved, actions taken with a different target may offset the overall risk.

ABOUT THIS DASHBOARD

Dependent on the measure, data may be available at a county or regional level. When you’ve chosen a particular filter, that value will apply as you move from measure to measure. You can change your view by clicking the menu on the left.

This dashboard does not represent the totality of all COVID-19 related data or information used by public health officials. Counties provide additional information about these risk assessment areas, as well as their ability to prevent or respond to outbreaks, when they submit their Safe Start applications. The state is continuing to refine and update its systems for collecting, compiling and reporting data. This dashboard will link to those new systems as they are completed. Data displayed on individual county websites may be different due to differences in when they pull or post their data. The state Department of Health also reports COVID-19 data as of the midnight the day prior.

This dashboard is viewed best on a desktop. If viewing on your phone, please rotate your phone to view horizontally.

Summary Data Tables

County

Rate per 100K of newly diagnosed cases during the prior two weeks

Rate per 100K of newly diagnosed cases during the prior two weeks (Goal is fewer than 25 per 100,000)

Number of individuals tested for each new case during the prior week

Number of individuals tested for each new case during the prior week (Goal is greater than 50)

Percent of individuals testing positive for COVID-19 during the past week

Percent of individuals testing positive for COVID-19 during the past week (Goal is less than 2%)

Percent of licensed beds occupied by patients

Percent of licensed beds occupied by patients (Goal is less than 80%)

Percent of licensed beds occupied by COVID-19 cases

Percent of licensed beds occupied by COVID-19 cases (Goal is less than 10%)

Adams

109.2

No

2.6

No

38.6%

No

11.1%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Asotin

4.4

Yes

70.0

Yes

0.0%

Yes

68.0%

Yes

8.0%

Yes

Benton

82.3

No

6.3

No

15.8%

No

63.8%

Yes

12.6%

No

Chelan

86.7

No

15.7

No

6.4%

No

68.4%

Yes

1.3%

Yes

Clallam

5.3

Yes

193.0

Yes

0.0%

Yes

70.2%

Yes

1.2%

Yes

Clark

31.1

No

13.4

No

7.5%

No

62.9%

Yes

1.4%

Yes

Columbia

0.0

Yes

11.0

No

0.0%

Yes

40.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Cowlitz

4.6

Yes

212.0

Yes

0.5%

Yes

21.7%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Douglas

102.8

No

9.9

No

10.1%

No

Yes

Yes

Ferry

0.0

Yes

25.0

No

0.0%

Yes

16.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Franklin

165.8

No

3.1

No

32.0%

No

92.0%

No

16.0%

No

Garfield

0.0

Yes

6.0

No

0.0%

Yes

72.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Grant

21.3

Yes

22.1

No

4.5%

No

50.9%

Yes

0.9%

Yes

Grays Harbor

4.0

Yes

112.0

Yes

0.9%

Yes

36.6%

Yes

8.5%

Yes

Island

2.4

Yes

162.0

Yes

0.6%

Yes

33.3%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Jefferson

3.1

Yes

52.0

Yes

1.9%

Yes

34.7%

Yes

4.1%

Yes

King

25.7

No

37.1

No

2.7%

No

71.7%

Yes

2.9%

Yes

Kitsap

0.7

Yes

824.0

Yes

0.1%

Yes

72.6%

Yes

5.1%

Yes

Kittitas

53.7

No

33.8

No

3.0%

No

23.0%

Yes

3.3%

Yes

Klickitat

22.3

Yes

60.4

Yes

1.7%

Yes

18.0%

Yes

2.0%

Yes

Lewis

2.5

Yes

84.0

Yes

1.2%

Yes

44.4%

Yes

1.3%

Yes

Lincoln

0.0

Yes

19.0

No

0.0%

Yes

60.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Mason

4.6

Yes

223.0

Yes

0.4%

Yes

68.0%

Yes

8.0%

Yes

Okanogan

21.1

Yes

47.3

No

2.1%

No

23.3%

Yes

1.4%

Yes

Pacific

0.0

Yes

72.0

Yes

0.0%

Yes

27.8%

Yes

5.6%

Yes

Pend Oreille

7.3

Yes

42.0

No

0.0%

Yes

33.3%

Yes

8.3%

Yes

Pierce

16.3

Yes

35.9

No

2.8%

No

69.9%

Yes

4.1%

Yes

San Juan

0.0

Yes

75.0

Yes

0.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Skagit

7.7

Yes

35.8

No

2.8%

No

76.3%

Yes

1.2%

Yes

Skamania

0.0

Yes

40.0

No

0.0%

Yes

Yes

Yes

Snohomish

21.4

Yes

45.7

No

2.2%

No

73.7%

Yes

3.7%

Yes

Spokane

39.2

No

19.8

No

5.0%

No

57.2%

Yes

1.2%

Yes

Stevens

2.2

Yes

169.0

Yes

0.0%

Yes

50.0%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Thurston

9.4

Yes

44.2

No

2.3%

No

86.5%

No

1.6%

Yes

Wahkiakum

0.0

Yes

17.0

No

0.0%

Yes

Yes

Yes

Walla Walla

8.0

Yes

71.7

Yes

1.4%

Yes

51.4%

Yes

1.4%

Yes

Whatcom

17.3

Yes

26.3

No

3.8%

No

75.1%

Yes

1.7%

Yes

Whitman

4.0

Yes

35.0

No

2.9%

No

45.7%

Yes

0.0%

Yes

Yakima

532.5

No

3.3

No

30.1%

No

74.4%

Yes

18.4%

No

Additional Data

These are snapshots of additional data collected and reviewed by public health officials. This data is updated weekly on Wednesdays. Last updated: June 3, 2020

High Risk Populations

Risk among communities at higher risk remains a concern especially in Eastern Washington. We continue to see elevated number of outbreaks in non-healthcare settings such as fruit and vegetable packing plants that are associated with populations commonly known to be employed in the agricultural communities.

Case Investigations & Contact Tracing

Ability to rapidly isolate those with COVID-19, and identify/quarantine their contacts measured by:

For cases investigated over the past month, we achieved the goal of reaching 90% of individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 within 24 hours of receiving a positive test report. Planning is still underway to ensure long-term staffing needs can be met for contact tracing investigators.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Availability of Personal Protective Equipment

Demand far exceeds supply so the state continues its aggressive procurement of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This effort is one of the state’s top priorities, due to the critical importance of PPE in protecting frontline workers from infection as well as the state’s ability to move forward under the Safe Start reopening plan.

Due to serious shortages of PPE in Washington - similar to those experienced around the country - the state must continue to prioritize distribution of PPE to local jurisdictions based on the most urgent needs.