House Dems have often waived read-the-bill transparency rules

House Democratic leaders this year have repeatedly waived transparency
rules aimed at providing members with enough time to read bills before
they vote on them.

On at least two dozen occasions in 2009, the transparency rules have been shelved — including on votes on wage discrimination, climate change and children’s health insurance, according to statistics culled by the Sunlight Foundation, a nonprofit group.

ADVERTISEMENT

After hearing from disgruntled voters over the August recess, six House Democrats defied their leaders by signing on to a discharge petition calling for action on legislation mandating that all bills be posted online 72 hours before a roll call vote.

Since 1971, House rules contained a similar measure, but with a loophole: The read-the-bill rule could be waived by a majority of members.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has committed to allowing lawmakers to scrutinize the healthcare reform bill 72 hours before it is voted on, but other members say this policy should apply to all legislation, without exception.

Leaders of the majority party in the House frown upon their members signing discharge petitions.

Rep. Brian Baird (Wash.), one of the half-dozen Democrats who has put his name on the discharge petition, said vulnerable Democrats will take a hit politically back home if they don’t sign it.

Baird said, “This is a common-sense, oughta-be-done, good-of-the-country position. If you are not on that position, the question is, why not? And the answer is you are somehow being pressured not to get on it or you have to defend it [with] some arcane, workings-of-the-House, discretion-of-the-majority-leader [argument] — that’s a tough sell when at the end of the day you’re voting for something you haven’t read.”

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Md.), the second-ranking Democrat in the House, calls the concept “sound” but opposes Baird’s resolution because it’s not feasible.

“What if only one short word or amendment is made? It’s one thing initially for a bill to have a long time, but if you come out of a conference and they don’t change anything then, you don’t need 72 hours. Sometimes you are at the end of the session and you don’t have 72 hours,” Hoyer told The Hill in an interview last week.

Baird disagrees. He says that all the “shenanigans” happen in end-of-the-year catchall omnibus spending bills. Baird believes no bill should be exempt from the rule. His measure would require a supermajority (two-thirds) to waive the 72-hour requirement.

The White House has broken this campaign promise on at least a couple of bills.

A new Rasmussen poll of 1,000 voters found that 83 percent of the public wants Congress to post legislation online two weeks before voting on it.

When Republicans ran the House, they passed a read-the-bill rule, but it also had holes in it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier (R-Calif.) concedes that his party was guilty of waiving the rule when it was in power.

“Absolutely — it is among the most commonly waived rules the House has,” Dreier said.

The Sunlight Foundation’s Lisa Rosenberg said that, like the Republican majority before them, Democrats have not kept their promise: “The current rule requires that members be able to see legislation for 72 hours before there’s a vote, but from our perspective that isn’t good enough.”