False doctrines abound in the church today over the volatile
subject of divorce.It seems that very
frequently some new theory or interpretation arises.The motivation usually appears to be the desire
to believe some doctrine that has a favorable result for a close friend or
family member rather than an honest search for truth.Some of the variant doctrines are examined in
these pages.

Does the innocent party in a marriage affected by
fornication maintain his right to divorce his wife even some time after they
have reconciled and gone back together?This article considers this question and examines the nature of the
marriage covenant and the principles of reconciliation.

This article originated as further study on divorce after
reconciliaiton.However,
foundationally the study became focused upon the marriage bond itself: what
it is, what it means, how it is created, broken, and restored.Due to how these studies evolved, the
author apologizes for some overlap in content.

Some preachers are privately teaching divorce after
reconciliation, some Christians are practicing it, and some churches are
tolerating it.This study examines the
various scriptural attempts to validate this doctrine heard by this writer in
private discussions.