Editorial: Larkspur's process, decision right on redwoods

That was evident in the process the city followed in approving the removal of five redwoods that have become a risk to a home on Park Way.

The property has more than 50 redwoods and the homeowners sought the city's permission to remove seven of them, some of which had grown to the point that they are causing structural damage to the house.

The council voted to OK the felling of the trees, but not before a hearing and review before the city Park and Recreation Commission, independent reports by arborists and a structural engineer and an appeal hearing by the City Council.

Larkspur's process worked, reflecting a community appreciation for protecting heritage trees — when and where it makes sense.

The council's 5-0 vote was the right decision. It confirms the findings of city staff and arborists that the relationship between the home and the stately trees had become incompatible. The council vote came down on the side of the house.

The homeowner originally proposed removal of two more trees, but the city said those trees should remain.

The city's decision to remove five redwoods was based on worries that the trees — one of which is 10 feet in diameter — had grown so close to the house that it wasn't safe for the structure or healthy for the trees. Experts advised the city the trees were damaging the dwelling's foundation and interfering with sewer lines.

The city's laws are aimed at preserving stately heritage trees important to the character and feel of the town.

These trees are not being removed on a home owner's whim, but because there is clear proof that they have grown to a point where they cannot co-exist with the house.