Editor’s note: When we received an advance copy of Rob Bell’s new book, Love Wins, in our offices a couple of weeks ago, we knew it would spark quite a bit of controversy. We just didn’t know it would happen before anyone else actually read the book.

But when his publisher, HarperOne, released a video “trailer” for the book last week, and blogger Justin Taylor wrote a blog suggesting Bell might be a universalist based on its content (sparking many national leaders to follow suit), the Internet exploded into a heated debate about heaven, hell, eternal consequences and universalism.

While our editors have indeed read Bell's book, we've chosen not to comment on the actual content of Love Wins until other people have had a chance to read it as well and can thoughtfully agree or disagree with our assessments. To jump into the fray with a quickly constructed 1,000-word knee-jerk reaction or quasi-book report, only because the topic is being debated this week, would be a grave disservice to our readers and to the book itself. Instead, we've chosen to do an in-depth piece on the topic in the May/June issue of RELEVANT, including a substantive interview with Bell himself.

However, to address the debates happening this week (mind you, about a book nobody's read yet), we turned to Scot McKnight, a noted theologian and Professor of Biblical & Theological Studies at North Park University, for some much-needed perspective. This is his piece:

Whether evangelicalism was paying attention or not, it is now. Universalism, or at least the prospect of it, is the single most significant issue running through the undercurrent of evangelicalism today. This all became clear this past Saturday when some noted faith leaders decided to publicly accuse Rob Bell of universalism on the basis of excerpts of his (not yet released) book, Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived, and on the basis of a video and the book’s description at HarperOne. So, while this new story is about Rob, I want to contend it is even more about the significance of universalism.

My own estimation is that somewhere near 75 percent of my students, many if not most of them nurtured in the church, are more or less universalist. They believe in Jesus and see themselves as Christians but don’t find significant problems in God saving Muslims and Buddhists or anyone else on the basis of how God makes such decisions. The Baylor Study of Religion, if my memory is correct, asked a question or two that reveals that an increasing number of American evangelical Christians think the majority of humans will be saved. That’s the issue, and Rob Bell had the moxie to write a book about it. He’s rattled cages with his promo video, and he will undoubtedly stir the waters in the book.

Many in the evangelical church have happily lived as if universalism is not an issue for good ol’ evangelicals. Those of us with our ears to the ground know better, and that is why I addressed this issue in a chapter in my book One.Life: Jesus Calls, We Follow. I called that chapter Eternity.Life. I begin by saying I believe in hell, but I want to believe in hell the way Jesus does. And I believe in heaven, but I want to believe in heaven as Jesus does. What Jesus believed about heaven and hell diverges at times from what many Christians think about heaven and hell.

As I wrote that chapter and as I listen to this new round of volleys, some of them embarrassing and some of them so over the top and so many of them without having read one word of the book, I keep thinking we need once again to define some terms, so I want to sketch a set of simple options. (Then I’ll say a few things about Rob Bell.)

Which of the following views do you think are “unorthodox”?

Universalism is the general belief that all will be saved, regardless of religious beliefs. The Muslim and the Christian are on the same basic path—and for universalists all will be saved.

Universalism needs to be distinguished from pluralism (though as I have sketched “universalism” above there is precious little difference). Pluralism focuses on the legitimacy of each religion and belief system and that each of them prepares a person for final existence with God. For pluralists, there’s no unique saving place for Jesus Christ.

Christian universalism is a bit different: Christian universalism denies pluralism and balder forms of universalism by contending that all can or will be saved, but only through the saving work of Jesus Christ. While many who advocate this fail to recognize that those in other religions simply don’t believe such a thing, and in fact may say they don’t want to be saved through Christ, the Christian universalist confidently trots out the idea that whether they know it or not, God saves through Jesus Christ. But the big point here is that all can and will be saved through Christ.

Evangelical universalism is newer on the block and argues that God saves exclusively through Christ and that those who deny Christ, or who have not heard of Christ, or who have rejected God’s natural revelation to them, will be judged and will experience hell. In other words, these folks believe in hell—though they believe “less” (or as they might say “more”) than the traditionalist. But they believe hell is not eternal but instead temporary and once one has experienced judgment for one’s sins one will have, by the grace of God and through the merits of Christ, the opportunity to respond to the Gospel—and this news is so good and God’s offer so gracious that eventually hell will be emptied and all will find redemption in Christ to enjoy God’s salvation forever.

There is yet another version: annihilationism or conditional immortality. This view is traditional in its appeal to evangelism and to the gospel of salvation through Christ alone—it is an exclusive claim—and that those who don’t respond to the Gospel will be judged and will experience hell, but that eventually their punishment will run out and they will be utterly destroyed and annihilated and cease from existence. Here one has both a traditional view of hell and, at the same time, some kind of correlation between temporary sins—say 75 years of utter rejection of all things pertaining to what they know of God and Christ—and the experience of justice. When that justice runs its course that person will be utterly extinguished. Instead of an eternal consciousness of separation from God, these folks believe only in eternal consequences.

Then there’s the traditional view: those who reject Christ, and some believe God’s mercy will be wide enough to include those who have never heard of Christ but have responded to the light they have comprehended (inclusivism)—and there’s latitude here for variations of several sorts—will be judged on the basis of that light. For traditionalists and some inclusivists their number is few so that billions who have not responded to Christ will suffer eternal and conscious separation from God. Some inclusivists would contend that many, if not most, humans will be finally saved.

The pressing issue today is both to comprehend the absolute seriousness of the Christian claim, to realize that the ground has shifted in that many who are associated with evangelicalism simply don’t believe the traditional view and have embraced some kind of universalism, and we need also to understand the options so we can all, one more time, go back to the Bible, to our church traditions, and study all over again—as if for the first time—what to believe.

Now a word or two about Rob Bell.

I’m grateful to God that Rob Bell is opening this after-life door and, from what I’m hearing, he’s only looking inside the door to see the prospects of universalism, asking you and me to realize both that we have some thoroughly unbiblical ideas and that we need to rethink this stuff all over again.

You Might Also Like

Friends, this is an old discussion, and there are some great studies out there. Rob Bell is almost certainly not adding something new, but he’s pushing the door open and saying: “Folks, this vast and massive room of universalism and what’s awaiting us when we die are things we must take much more seriously. The next generation of Christians are pressing upon this door and we better stop and listen and think it through one more time.”

My contention is this: the approach to this generation is not to denounce their questions, which often enough are rooted in a heightened sensitivity to divine justice and compassion, but to probe their questions from the inside and to probe thoughtful and biblically responsible resolutions. We need to show that their questions about justice and God’s gracious love are not bad questions but good questions that deserve to be explored.

Rob Bell is asking my students’ questions on that promo video and then, as you watch the video, he walks away. Rob and his people are artists, and you can read that walking away any way you want—but I’ll wait until we can all read the book. I hope you do too.

Scot Mcknight is Karl A. Olsson professor in religion studies at North Park University and author of One.Life. This article originally appeared on Jesus Creed. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Top Comments

this dude has gotten wacked out....use to like his stuff at first, esp the nuema videos...now... WOW, are you kidding me...none of it is biblically based. Jesus came to keep God from sending you to hell and thus Jesus came to save you from God?....are you kidding me...that is NOTHING at all of what God's Word teaches. On the contrary it teaches that ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God and without accepting Christ as a propitionary (which God offers freely for ALL to choose) hell is the place we are destined for...not of God's choosing, but of our own. I think this whole universalism CRAP is just a way of Christians finding yet another excuse for not sharing their faith.

you are merciless ruthless psycho - believing in billions should end up in hell for eternity. whats the point of dying on cross and great redemption scheme. just to save handful and the rest throw them like discarded - created by God and his choice. excuse me. i am sick and tired of people who love this kinda of stuff. so happy to get ridd of the guilt by preaching the gospel so they can be free from guilt to enjoy heaven while the rest burn in hell whether they were good or bad human.

this dude has gotten wacked out....use to like his stuff at first, esp the nuema videos...now... WOW, are you kidding me...none of it is biblically based. Jesus came to keep God from sending you to hell and thus Jesus came to save you from God?....are you kidding me...that is NOTHING at all of what God's Word teaches. On the contrary it teaches that ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God and without accepting Christ as a propitionary (which God offers freely for ALL to choose) hell is the place we are destined for...not of God's choosing, but of our own. I think this whole universalism CRAP is just a way of Christians finding yet another excuse for not sharing their faith.

why we are destined to hell.. whose choice, well you mean us. so who created the man and who created the hell. it was for fallen angel and they should have been thrown their without wasting a single moment. but he was let loose so he can tempt humans as programmed by God. he knew it all didn't he. you know it Jared. you are very cruel to say human are destined to hell. excuse me. we are not created by choice we were not given choice to eat red or blue pill. yes we were ,as bible says, given free will. coz he did not want robots to follow him. the whole creation and Eden stuff is nothing but tragic drama plot to inflict pain and misery to human created by God's desire. he installed the virus of free will, original sin in us by himself. he put the temptation, planted in the garden delibrately, he allowed satan to enter the Eden to tempt and provoke. which he knew they will fall and so can bring twist to his drama and plot.

you are merciless ruthless psycho - believing in billions should end up in hell for eternity. whats the point of dying on cross and great redemption scheme. just to save handful and the rest throw them like discarded - created by God and his choice. excuse me. i am sick and tired of people who love this kinda of stuff. so happy to get ridd of the guilt by preaching the gospel so they can be free from guilt to enjoy heaven while the rest burn in hell whether they were good or bad human.

if God is loving and so caring he wouldn't or should not do such thing. this is against just and fair God. we see this kind of injustice in the world and we do not and should not expect from God to do the same stuff. if this is the teaching of bible than we must shake our intellect and sanity to think of the biblical plot again.

NHL
jerseys The
Sabres will hang onto the alternate sweater they introduced this season as part
of their 40th anniversary celebration.

Though nothing is changing, I thought it worth mentioning here as some
thought perhaps the NFL
jerseys would be
worn only this season and then retired. In fact, it seems the royal blue will
hang around at least one more year. Possibly longer.

Also, the jersey does feature the throwback Sabres logo with their
founding year, 1970, set inside. This was used as the team's 40th anniversary
mark but it's not specific to this year, which means it's likely to stay on the
sweater.

It goes without saying, but Buffalo's home and road uniforms will also
stay the same for 2011-12. Overall, this might be the best set of sweaters in
the MLB
jerseys. And
it's all because they're paying attention to their past.

Two

Apparently
the Kings intend to toss out everything and go back to the drawing board in
2011. Wow.

Actually,
if I'm being honest this complete reboot wasn't entirely unforeseen. The
teamNBA
jerseys has been dropping hints over the past year.
For example, the players opted to wear the black third jerseys throughout their
2010 playoff run. And the throwback launched this season is very popular among
fans.

Not
only that, but Icethetics reported in October on photos of possible jersey
prototypes seen in Luc Robitaille's office at the Kings' practice facility.
They are essentially white versions of the current third jersey (right).

Kings
throwback jersey / from Getty ImagesSo if I had to guess, the crown logo along
with the black and purple sweaters will disappear. Replacing them will be the
LA shield logo along with black and white Football
jerseys.
And as for the third, obviously the purple and gold throwback is the
front-runner.

And
that suspicion just got a little more meat on it last night when the Kings
added nameplates to those cheap
jerseys.
Surnames are a league requirement on uniforms, but they got away without them
for opening night against the Canucks as they were celebrating the 40th
anniversary of their first meeting which was at a time when
jerseys didn't have nameplates.

So now this is a complete uniform and it looks phenomenal. Fans like it
and there's no reason not to keep it around. I wouldn't be at all surprised if
that's how things shake out for the Kings next season. Black and white regular
unis and very colorful thirds.

Three

writing
methods to compose a composition, permit the learners making utilization of the
text message inside the expression of information to method, pursuing creating
to alter with text message sense..comprehension a forward of within pride and
also to spring vibrant common xiaoxinganling common tone elegance learners
garnish pursuing the with mountain cheap nfl jerseys abundant resources,
read." this sequence of parallelism pandora charms sentence and metaphor
sentences, the campus that visual element the elm modelling is genuine sports
jerseys
genuinely about is perfectly. creating methods for some oral and

For the
states 2011 nfl
pro
sentence,inside the cheap jerseys as trees of casual, compose log leaves
produce the jerseys parable of. In assisting released some places of interest,
humanities landscape away from your text, I inspire the scholar to participate
inside the wrestle "little guide" activities, on this particular way
the scholar is astonishingly easy to recognize the text message concept
content... In developed creating training, I in instruction the stunning xiaoxinganling
mountain, "a type pursuing the spring, arrange, permit the learners
composition recently to some toy store or look at out outside the observed the
stunning scenery getting a signifies to compose down. low cost mlb jerseys For
example: some learners nfl jerseys in NFL Canada Goose JERSEYS describing the
campus when scenery wrote: "we campus the elm modelling how stunning elm
trees planted The North cope with visual element condition: some, that consist
of the giraffe, in partnership; some are just like a peacock, looking for at it
to show grownup males and females the stunning feather, laugh to fulfill
guests,...... Migration can be to permit the learners to convey within text
message comprehension to convey method.Reading assisting can't from unique
vocabulary discussion activity, should and method of lifestyle closely linked
together. Summer, autumn, the winter time period three components to
information the learners to take advantage of the exact exact same method to
wholesale nfl jerseys comprehend.

Four

For Sale nhl jerseys
discount or participating in the physical activity you perhaps can endure for
making a wonderful bit from performing this kind of work consistently.Williams
wants to aid the Philadelphia colleges learners reach their goals, hoping to
inspire others to support higher schooling in Philadelphia.Most investors
inside scholarship applications for Philadelphia colleges learners recognize
the some thing should be done to aid the citys youth succeed.

A night time out around the town for dinner and
movie could provide you with an chance for making some cash babysitting.
cheap nfl jerseys transformation
nfl jerseys discount you perhaps can post adverts for the time and day for the
vehicle rinse as good as the location. But truth is love in its purest sense.In
order to evaluate reading fluency, there are very a few measurement tools.
Truth is often brutal and belligerent. They wish to have got an access to
higher schooling and add degrees to their profiles.Detroit Lions Jerseys

It outings me out to hear Believers speak about their encounters during
evangelism and how disgusted they're with the globe or those who dont believe
that Jesus Christ is Lord.transformation football discount
or participating in the physical activity. This nfl jerseys
store is within truth the best time to
allow them to know the worth of dollars and how difficult it is often to earn.
by no means cursed,hermes handbag, drank or smoked themselves.

Five

As rumored, the Maple Leafs will be debuting a new
third jersey for the 2011-12 season.

The current third
nfl jerseys wholesale jersey in its Reebok
incarnation launched in 2008. Prior to that, the same design was used from 2000
to 2007. It was based on a uniform and logo the Leafs used from 1958 to 1967.

When team management has recently discussed
changing the uniform with the media, they've said the plan is to borrow from
their own history once again.

Leafs '70s throwbacks / from Getty ImagesA year
ago, Toronto paid tribute to the 1970s as the players skated out in replica
jerseys for warm-ups. They nfl
jerseys store matched
sweaters worn by the team from 1970 until 1992. Rumors suggest the team may
look to that era for its next alternate uniform.

They look great and just different enough to
distinguish themselves from the recently altered home and road jerseys. Fans
always love the retro look so the Leafs would probably be wise to go this
route.

Beyond that, there's not much else in the Maple
Leafs' jersey history that isn't a little crazy. So unless they go with the
'70s throwbacks, they'll have to come up with something completely new. And
that doesn't usually work out well for them.

And I'll say it once again. We won't really know anything until next
summer, fall at the latest. But the Leafs nfl jerseys usually like to make a big deal about jersey unveilings so I'm sure
we'll know when it's

Six

The
fact that Facebook found itself addressing a regulatory charge of some kind
should have come as no surprise, given the brouhaha about annual changes to its
user interface and profile privacy settings. Little wonder, too, cheap NFL JERSEYS, that such a conflict would have widespread implications for digital
marketing.

Late
last month, Facebook reached an agreement with the Federal Trade Commissionmlb regarding accusations that it misled users
about the privacy of data shared on the site. The company "deceived
consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private,
and then repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made public," the FTC
said in its announcement of the settlement.

The
settlement requires audits of Facebook privacy practices. VentureBeat has
reported that this has led to a reorganization. Five product groups must report
to CEO Mark Zuckerberg. This will eliminate questions about how informed
leadership should be about product development.

The
various reactions to the Facebook news are fascinating to watch -- and not just
because of the company's place in social media and its ability to connect 800
million people to events, articles, and one another. Many people have nba
jerseys criticized Facebook's privacy measures, but numbers suggest
that its use continues unabated. Participants reportedly spend as many as 15
hours per month on the site. AllAnalytics.com community editor Shawn Hessinger
captured Facebooks relationship with privacy best in his comment,
"Facebook is simply the poster child for this kind of problem today, but
there is no evidence it has hurt the company's popularity or revenue."

doctrine of hell sucks. it is unfair to send humans there if this actually exist. so unfair and unjust. God created man by His own choice, he created hell for fallen angels, they should have been dumped over there soon after found guilty. but no no no they were let loose to cause more problems, intentionally by God with all the knowledge of future and eternity, poor creature, billions of them will end up there. no nono human choose to go there not God. really??? joking me. you gave free will, you plant the tree in the Garden, you allow Satan in the Garden, you put them high security risk to put their eternity and future at stake deliberately!!!!! thats not fair at all. why you programmed such a world where you finally want to throw majority of your creation to hell fire for eternity?? you could have programmed it other way. Whats the point of this whole drama of human history and fall and redemption and punishment. Why started it at first place. excuse me. this is not fair. we need to ask serious questions about the whole plot instead of doing this silly theological reasoning which does not make any sense to anyone - ever. a sound mind does not and cannot accept this whole creation redemption plot. accusing people of being sinners by giving them the ability to sin first then sending them to hell to justify the written plot which cannot be changed. what a joke!

doctrine of hell sucks. it is unfair to send humans there if this actually exist. so unfair and unjust. God created man by His own choice, he created hell for fallen angels, they should have been dumped over there soon after found guilty. but no no no they were let loose to cause more problems, intentionally by God with all the knowledge of future and eternity, poor creature, billions of them will end up there. no nono human choose to go there not God. really??? joking me. you gave free will, you plant the tree in the Garden, you allow Satan in the Garden, you put them high security risk to put their eternity and future at stake deliberately!!!!! thats not fair at all. why you programmed such a world where you finally want to throw majority of your creation to hell fire for eternity?? you could have programmed it other way. Whats the point of this whole drama of human history and fall and redemption and punishment. Why started it at first place. excuse me. this is not fair. we need to ask serious questions about the whole plot instead of doing this silly theological reasoning which does not make any sense to anyone - ever. a sound mind does not and cannot accept this whole creation redemption plot. accusing people of being sinners by giving them the ability to sin first then sending them to hell to justify the written plot which cannot be changed. what a joke!