A Funny Thing Happened On the Way to the Meeting

The “default” for quorums for membership meetings and votes under the Corporations Code is one third of the members. Most homeowner association bylaws say the quorum is a majority (of members voting in person, by proxy or secret ballot). Some also say that if the quorum isn’t met, it “drops down” to one third of the members.

Quorum requirements for board action are different and have their own twists. Under Corporations Code section 7211 a quorum is a majority of the number of directors authorized in the articles or bylaws. They can provide for a different quorum with a few quirky rules, including a new one that says that if a specified person is required for a quorum (it would typically be a representative of the project “declarant”) the absence of that person means the quorum doesn’t exist even if all other directors attended the meeting. And, conversely, if there is only one director, she or he can appoint another and those two can appoint a third and in a board of five, those three can then appoint the forth and fifth directors (but usually vacancies created by a membership recall can only be filled by a vote of the members). Unlike membership meetings and votes, quorums for board action cannot be made by use of ballots or proxies. Personal attendance (including telephonic attendance) is required.

Wisconsin Roulette – Act 1

Here’s what happened in Wisconsin. The rules of their Senate required that any law involving spending money could not be approved unless a quorum of Senators were present for the vote. The Democrats’ gambit was to scoot over to and camp out in Illinois thus denying the Republicans the quorum they needed to “do business.”

Could this scenario play out in the world of homeowner associations? Absolutely. Here are some examples:

The Authorized Number of Directors Challenge: If the bylaws authorized five directors but only three are serving, all three would need to be present to establish a quorum so the board could lawfully act. So, if one director opposed a decision supported by the other two, the opposing director could simply not attend the meeting and no action could be taken since the quorum wasn’t met. (There are a number of remedies for this situation but a discussion of them is beyond the scope of this article).

Special Assessment? Under Civil Code section 1366, approval of a large special assessment requires the “yes” vote of a majority of ballots cast once quorum has been met. Under this law, a quorum is more than 50% of the membership. Thus, the fewest number of votes needed to authorize a large special assessment is about 26% of the members. When a vote only needs a majority of a quorum of members, we say the requirement is for a “simple majority” (and this is contrasted with votes requiring a majority of all owners, which are called an “absolute majority”).

Removal of Directors: Generally, it takes a “simple majority” of members to cast ballots in favor of removal of a board for the recall effort to succeed (for incorporated associations of 50 or more separate interests). This is standard stuff but add these two wrinkles: if the recall is against less than the whole board and the bylaws permit “cumulative voting” for the election of directors, removal of any particular director will take far more than a simple majority of members; in fact, in a typical case involving a 100 lot planned development, it would take about 84% of all members to approve the recall of one or more (but less than all) directors for the vote to succeed.

These last two examples mirror what the Republicans achieved in Wisconsin. The careful study of applicable voting rules can guide an association and its members and leaders in framing votes to achieve desired results. For a board, these rules may be used to help achieve goals believed to be in the Association’s best interest. For others, the rules may be used to oppose those goals or the timing, manner or conditions by which they would be achieved. In all cases, how an issue is framed may be among the most important decision made.

We needed structure and guidance and we are so appreciative to get that from this company.

R. BellTreasurerHope Crossing

I just want you to know that you have a very valuable asset and as we evaluated our relationship with Community Association Management – which we just did by upgrading our service package, signing up for a new 3 year term, which included a full time property manager and also investing in project management services – that our desire to enhance the scope of our relationship had a large part to do with your team.

BarryPresidentEastover VillasCharlotte, NC

Quite impressed with the eManageSuite system!!

S. Reavis; Charlotte, NCImpressive!

I honestly do not have the vocabulary to describe how much Community Association Management means to our community, and what a wonderful Job you do for our community. You treat us like we are the only community you manage. We feel so taken care of and well run. Thank you!

Dallas M. Indian Trail, NCI don't have the words....

Solid Customer Service!
Your focus on solid customer service has made the transition go as smoothly as possible and reassures us we made the right decision to go with Community Association Management. I personally appreciate the way you communicate, your availability, and the way you make things happen.

J. WilliamsArdrey Place - Charlotte, NC

Community Association Management has done a very good job for us . They provide good expense management and provide prompt monthly reports regarding all expenditures. Likewise , they have been quick to respond to the various problems that seem to always come up from time to time . In conclusion , I would highly recommend their organization.

Frank M., Charlotte ,NCGood Expense Management....

Community Association Management is a solutions provider that enables HOA Boards to run efficiently and effectively. Their service is off the charts and their depth of knowledge and experience are invaluable.

Ace T., Charlotte, NCInvaluable Knowledge and Experience

A good friend of mine who is a recent past president of a community here in Charlotte contacted me this evening to ask who we used for property management. I told him that the only game in town was Community Association Management! I also mentioned that you may be a young company in years but are now one of the top 5 HOA management companies in the Carolinas. We are very happy with our decision to use Community Association Management.

C.M. Layman, Charlotte, NC The only Game in Town!

“Community Association Management is extremely thorough and knowledgeable in their approach to business. They are also very timely in their communications. They have saved our community a lot of money. When they first approached us and told us how much we could save by working with them, we thought the promise was ‘too good to be true’. They have more than delivered on that promise and more.”

Significant Cost SavingsBob A., Raleigh, NC

I like the professionalism of Community Association Management and the reporting. our Portfolio Manager is great! Good to work with and responsive. I also like Community Association Management being involved with legislative issues.