/sci/ Science & Math

Warning: All the content of this page originally come from 4chan.org. This is only a partial archive made to avoid destruction. Some posts and images may be missing. All the messages below have been posted by anonymous users and we do not guarantee any truth of what they said.For any illegal content, please contact me so that I can immediatly destroy it!Anonymous 2015-02-12 17:18:38 No.7064341

[Missing image file: ]

This is considered PhD level research at Georgia Tech.

So, the author of the paper will get a PhD from Georgia Tech and if you actually see what she does, you'll see it is in shit areas.

Meanwhile STEMfags at Georgia Tech will barely get a PhD in Math/CS/Physics etc.

Andrew Kraebel: “English Traditions of Biblical Criticism and Translation in the Later Middle Ages” directed by Alastair Minnis, Jessica Brantley, and Ian Cornelius

Tessie Prakas: “The Office of the Poet: Ministry and Verse Practice in the Seventeenth Century” directed by John Rogers, David Kastan, and Catherine Nicholson

Nienke Christine Venderbosch: “‘Tha Com of More under Misthleothum Grendel Gongan’: The Scholarly and Popular Reception of Beowulf’s Grendel from 1805 to the Present Day” directed by Roberta Frank and Paul Fry

>>7064363
What in your opinion should English PhDs be writing about? Or do you think literature isn't an appropriate object for academic study at all?

>>

Anonymous 2015-02-12 17:57:41 No.7064420

>>7064341
If you research dumb subjects in a shitty field, you just have a shitty PhD, that's all. It isn't as if a PhD is of uniform value regardless of where you get it or in what subject, you can get fucking PhDs in communications from shitbutt U if you want, but who will give a shit?

Contact me | All the content on this website come from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.