Adoption has always been the answer to orphans. The problem today is there are not enough babies thanks to the legal murder of babies. As a woman, I'm ashamed that well over 52 million of the unborn have been chemically killed, had their brains sucked out while being born and dumped aside to die alone without comfort because obama said to do that if the baby after treatment is still alive. This country is 350 million, if we keep this rate of killing our young this country will not exist. My neighbors went to S.America for two babies because the lists they were on were ridiculously long. And, wow, a Christian college can't stand up for not killing the innocent, seems to me that's the problem with Christians today, not willing to go to the cross and die. That college needs to close. A puppy set on fire in our area got more sympathy than a baby in it's carrier's womb being killed. Planned Parenthood (the main killer of babies) is still in business and those trying to kill the puppy are in jail. This is the U.S. today. I do not approve of abuse of animals or babies. As for women, please, in this age of longevity, what the heck is 9 months out of a woman's life to save her future sanity and make another woman happy who can't have children. As for rape, the sins of the father visited upon the children, good thing all the sins of fathers aren't visited upon their children. What does Jesus say about sin of one visited upon the innocent one.

What about if there were more babies born than could be adopted? If there were more unwanted babies than foster parents? If every single pregnancy resulted in a birth, as you insist would be moral and just, then the population of your country would balloon. There would be a consequent strain on resources and space and infrastructure, in the cities at least.
What happens to this excess population? Where do they go? Do they expand into the wilderness, further obliterating the nature reserves? Or do you want to become like India, teeming cities full of slums and shanty towns and street kids?

As for rape, the sins of the father visited upon the children, good thing all the sins of fathers aren't visited upon their children. What does Jesus say about sin of one visited upon the innocent one.

How convenient. You people forget that according to the bible, all women are destined to suffer in childbirth because of Eve's generational sin.

And now we're back to 'born innocent' again? What happened to 'we're all born evil and mired in our own sin'?

They are not babies, they are microscopic clumps of cells; PIMPLES ON YOUR ASS ARE BIGGER AND MORE COMPARABLE TO A LIVE INFANT; and your understanding of how abortions are actually performed is about as awful as one would expect from your typical sensationalist parrot - go visit your sins upon yourself.

First of all, crack a medical text book and look up the procedure. Or take two seconds to listen to yourself scream how they're killed three times in sequence.

Second, read up on current population growth, overpopulation, and the current number of kids up for adoption. Any one of those numbers outstrips the number of abortions performed in a year. Population growth wouldn't freeze if it tripled.

Third, rape babies often become surrogates for the rapist taking a lifetime of rage and abuse in their stead.

Finally, that puppy has cognitive function. A fetus does not develop such until late in the pregnancy.

Adoption has always been the answer to orphans. The problem today is there are not enough babies thanks to the legal murder of babies.

So what you're saying is that you wish there were fewer abortions so more babies could become orphans?

dumped aside to die alone without comfort because obama said to do that if the baby after treatment is still alive.

This was a lie spread by Ann Coulter.

This country is 350 million, if we keep this rate of killing our young this country will not exist.

Yeah, because nobody anywhere in this country are having kids they actually want. Are you F'ing kidding me? 350 million people and America is in danger of going extinct?

seems to me that's the problem with Christians today, not willing to go to the cross and die.

You know, I was just thinking the same thing.

A puppy set on fire in our area got more sympathy than a baby in it's carrier's womb being killed.

See, here's where your problem is. You keep thinking of tiny clumps of cells as babies, and keep thinking that they have more feeling than a born, living organism that can actually feel pain.

As for women, please, in this age of longevity, what the heck is 9 months out of a woman's life to save her future sanity and make another woman happy who can't have children.

But if she's poor, you'll complain that your tax dollars are paying for her hospital stay. And if she's black, chances are her child won't be adopted for a very long time, if ever.

As for rape, the sins of the father visited upon the children, good thing all the sins of fathers aren't visited upon their children.

I guess you've never understood the Catholic idea of Original Sin, or the similar Protestant idea that we all need to be "saved" by baptism (washing away our sin) or else burn in Hell for the sin of being born human. And don't get me started on all the people in the bible who were cursed because of what one of their ancestors did.

But at any rate, it's reprehensible to punish rape victims for forcing them to carry their rapist's baby.

Even with all the propaganda vids and religious idiocy, how does a girl get so self-loathing that they see women as broodmares who should be popping out kids in case complete strangers want one? She almost disgusts me as much as a teenager I knew that insisted women should die with a fetus if it's a non-viable pregnancy. Her reasoning? Women should be looking after their babies that are up in heaven. I guess Jesus must be a shitty babysitter!

"Carriers" are supposed to incubate "babies", even if inoculated with the spawn by force, but people like you will go to South America (the Southern Cone, no doubt) to get brand new, white, healthy ones, ideally blue-eyed boys, because the brown ones, black ones, older ones, or ones born with problems, who are now festering in group homes, just aren't nice enough to put on your coffee table.

I'd add that what you've described isn't an abortion. It's a destroying operation, carried out when there's no hope of a healthy delivery, usually because the mother didn't have prenatal diagnostics in time for a Ceasarian to prevent a stuck birth.

There are plenty of children in foster care who need either temporary foster parents or permanent adopters. Don't give a shit about those children because they're too old or what? And the babies in other countries just aren't good enough, apparently. Those babies who need a home, well, SOL for you if there are American babes around.

And, yeah, squeezing out a little hominid is no big thing, these days. You magically get all the emotional, mental, medical, and financial support you could need. If you just don't *want* to have one, well, TS. Like that's a valid excuse, ever. Somebody else (maybe) wants the thing and that's what's important.

And, sure, scraping out uterus contents and blood is the same as lighting a puppy on fire. Apples to apples. And Obama wants to kill all babies ever and hurr-durr-bluuh....

My neighbors went to S.America for two babies because the lists they were on were ridiculously long.

They're ridiculously long because we do strict background checks to make sure the child isn't being sent to some psycho. It has nothing to do with a lack of children to adopt.

This country is 350 million, if we keep this rate of killing our young this country will not exist.

Yeah? Because last I've checked abortion has been legal for almost 40 years and the population has only kept rising.

A puppy set on fire in our area got more sympathy than a baby in it's carrier's womb being killed.

That's because a puppy is far more complex and capable of feeling more pain than a zygote.

As for rape, the sins of the father visited upon the children, good thing all the sins of fathers aren't visited upon their children. What does Jesus say about sin of one visited upon the innocent one.

Yeah, what the hell. Let's force raped teenagers to carry to term even though they have an increased chance of complications and will now have to take time away from their career aspirations to raise a baby born of rape.

Oh, so you will only adopt babies? I will tell that to all the non-baby orphans so that when they grow up they will make sure you will never have the pleasure of adopting anyone. And "9 months out of a woman's life to save her future sanity"? What the hell does that mean? You do know some women have postpartum depression, and can be a detriment to both mother AND child? Oh, but apparently you live in La La Land where all is right and everyone should be God-Fearing Christians.