At 7/21/2014 8:59:59 AM, Installgentoo wrote:1. if I say something doesn't have a cause, it doesn't have a cause2. I say the universe doesn't have a cause3. therefore, the universe doesn't have a cause4. therefore, God doesn't exist

1) Atheist: "You shouldn't believe in God because there's no evidence of it."(2) Theist: "But God revealed Himself to me."(3) Atheist: "That's not evidence."(4) Theist: "But it's evidence as far as I'm concerned."(5) Atheist: "No it's not because I didn't experience it. You shouldn't believe things unless I experience them too."(6) Therefore, God does not exist.

(1) There's some evidence that Jesus Christ did exist.(2) But there's not that much.(3) Therefore, it's stupid to think he existed.(4) Therefore, God does not exist.

thomism.org.

So you have time to post this crap yet have no time to debate me? Are you hit-and-run or something?

If you are too scared of losing, debate me on whether God exists. I have only one debate under my belt and only won because my opponent forfeited. Surely you won't turn down an easy victory against a newbie ?

At 7/21/2014 8:59:59 AM, Installgentoo wrote:1. if I say something doesn't have a cause, it doesn't have a cause2. I say the universe doesn't have a cause3. therefore, the universe doesn't have a cause4. therefore, God doesn't exist

1. if a theist says their gawd doesn't have a cause, it doesn't have a cause2. A theist says the gawd doesn't have a cause3. therefore, gawd doesn't have a cause4. This is still not evidence (let alone proof) that God exists

(1) Atheist: "You shouldn't believe in God because there's no evidence of it."(2) Theist: "But God revealed Himself to me."(3) Atheist: "That's not evidence."(4) Theist: "But it's evidence as far as I'm concerned."(5) Atheist: "No it's not because I didn't experience it. You shouldn't believe things unless I experience them too."(6) Therefore, God does not exist.

(1) Atheist: "I don't believe in God because there's no evidence of it."(2) Theist: "But God revealed Himself to me."(3) Atheist: "How, precisely, did you receive this revelation?"(4) Theist: "In a dream, and it's evidence as far as I'm concerned."(5) Atheist: "If dreams were evidence or validation, this world would already have been fixed..."(6) Therefore, your dream does not qualify as evidence (neither does falling down on the ground and babbling incoherent gibberish...), and your gawd doesn't exist.

(1) There's some evidence that Jesus Christ did exist.(2) But there's not that much.(3) Therefore, it's stupid to think he existed.(4) Therefore, God does not exist.

(1) There's some evidence that Jesus Christ did exist.(2) But there's not that much, and there is ZERO evidence of miracles or that he was, in any way, divine.(3) Therefore, it's stupid to automatically jump to a conclusion you held before examining historical "evidence."(4) Therefore, your gawd does not exist.

I thought I'd just give a quick correction on your obvious disingenuous biblebabblewoowooprattle...

Logic and Reason are the precursor to Justice.
Faith and zealotry are the precursor to Folly.