Remember that often in a deletion vote, it doesn't look good for one side to pull out a lot of new members on wiki. Also, numbers don't always matter. Either way, those who support restoration are making very valid points compared to those voting for deletion.

Remember that often in a deletion vote, it doesn't look good for one side to pull out a lot of new members on wiki. Also, numbers don't always matter. Either way, those who support restoration are making very valid points compared to those voting for deletion.

Then Why does it still feel like we're losing?

I don't think anyone is truly out to get us on this, but Splash (A moderator there) seems to more more then determined to try to keep us from claiming noteabillity by completely ignoring the evidance we put forth.

Come on people, they've got it back to a tie, We need more votes, please! PLEASE! (If you haven't voted yet please do so. and Try to add a constructive comment about it's noteabillity.)

« Last Edit: March 15, 2006, 01:12:00 pm by sgore »

Logged

What meme is relevant right now? Look, just imagine I'm riffing on that. Updating signatures is exhausting.

Since he posted the company does that mean I can finally use it (The Fact you started that company) for the undeletion thing? It would really help my case Not too long from now mods will see that and and realize the article is still up for undeletion, and that'll be promptly deleted, really hurting my case

Logged

What meme is relevant right now? Look, just imagine I'm riffing on that. Updating signatures is exhausting.

Since he posted the company does that mean I can finally use it (The Fact you started that company) for the undeletion thing? It would really help my case Not too long from now mods will see that and and realize the article is still up for undeletion, and that'll be promptly deleted, really hurting my case

Not to mention that if the person who made that IP address is among the votes being cast, it could really be bad.

Spizzma? I think he has an account here, but he never voted so he's been unaware of it. still it will surface and unless we can use his company's name in the argument (Like it says in the article) we cannot get anyone to change their votes. Have we your permission steve?

Edit: What the heckuba? You've had it listed on this site the whole time in the about you section?! I thought there was some whole thing and... well Thank goodness. Now I can finally mention it.

« Last Edit: March 16, 2006, 07:22:22 pm by sgore »

Logged

What meme is relevant right now? Look, just imagine I'm riffing on that. Updating signatures is exhausting.

Since he posted the company does that mean I can finally use it (The Fact you started that company) for the undeletion thing? It would really help my case Not too long from now mods will see that and and realize the article is still up for undeletion, and that'll be promptly deleted, really hurting my case

Oh yeah, you can mention SuperNova all you want now. All NDAs and such that I had are now expired.

Since he posted the company does that mean I can finally use it (The Fact you started that company) for the undeletion thing? It would really help my case Not too long from now mods will see that and and realize the article is still up for undeletion, and that'll be promptly deleted, really hurting my case

Oh yeah, you can mention SuperNova all you want now. All NDAs and such that I had are now expired.

Logged

"By placing a light in a field at night, the boy flies fly in, and as they pass near the light they are unknowingly shot in the reproductives by invisible radiation and sterilized...They mate and die happy. The female lays her eggs and she dies happy. The eggs die and we are happy..."

Oh yeah, you can mention SuperNova all you want now. All NDAs and such that I had are now expired.

Is that just a case of good timing?

It seems like only a week ago that we couldn't tell any one.

Maybe I am wrong. It has happened once before...

It is very complex. It wasn't that I couldn't talk about it, but I just didn't want to.

Long story short, after you sell a company there is a time afterwards where there are certain things you can't talk about for a period of time. And just to make things easier I just didn't talk about the topic at all. But now the time has expired and I can talk about it if I wish. So it's not that I couldn't talk about it at all in the past, but it was just easier not to promote discussion on this topic, that's all really.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaming_SteveHm, just came across this...probably won't last long. Doesn't do justice to the site anyway. But still, It's gone about 5 days without anyone saying anything by looking at the history.

Logged

What meme is relevant right now? Look, just imagine I'm riffing on that. Updating signatures is exhausting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaming_SteveHm, just came across this...probably won't last long. Doesn't do justice to the site anyway. But still, It's gone about 5 days without anyone saying anything by looking at the history.

If you can, report it. That way you can build a big reputation of being a steadfast supporter of the rules. And next year, when they bring up notability, you can say how many ime Glicker just popped up on the radar. I also reccomend shutting this topic down. Should they see it, it could hurt your arguements for next year. Also, everyone who voted already, keeping contributing whenever you can. So they can't cite "they're all new members and therefore their opinions mean less than ours."