A racial partition of the United States for the purpose of
racial preservation and independence would involve the creation
of separate, independent and sovereign racial nations in accordance
with the principles of racial rights, racial security and the
Racial Compact. A just partition would take into consideration
the relative historical role of each racial group as well as their
current position, and a practical partition would seek to create
compact racial nations with geographical integrity and the shortest
possible borders for their area. Persons of mixed racial ancestry
would be classified according to their visible racial traits,
characteristics and identity (or phenotype) and assigned to the
most appropriate racial nation. Racially-mixed families would
be classified and assigned according to the racial identity or
phenotype of the children. Many different plans for partition
are possible. The author offers the following proposal as one
possibility for consideration.

For the purpose of geographic partition for racial preservation
and independence, the population of the United States could be
divided into eight racial groupings, as listed below:

1. A European racial grouping consisting of the European-American
population (i.e., those Americans of European racial type and
ancestry) and centered around the Northern European or Nordish-American
population as its founding, racially defining and predominant
core element. It would also include those persons of mixed European
and non-European ancestry whose European ancestry is predominant,
whose non-European ancestry is not physically obvious, whose
physical phenotype or appearance is within the normal European
range (i.e., who are of European racial type), who are socially
recognized and identified as European, and who are assimilated
into, and personally identify themselves with, the European-American
population. This grouping comprised about 86% of the U.S. population
in 1880, 79.7% in 1970, and 72% in 1994.

2. A Congoid (Sub-Saharan African) grouping consisting of
all members of the Congoid race (including all persons of obvious
partial Congoid ancestry except the mixed Afro-Hispanic Caribbean
peoples of grouping #8 below) in North America, and all those
in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to
their own ancestral homelands. This group comprised 11.1% of
the U.S. population in 1970 and 12.1% in 1994.

3. A "Latino" Mestizo and Amerindian racial grouping
consisting of the Mexican, Central American and South American
Mestizo (mixed Amerindian and Caucasian) and Indian population.
This group, the great majority of the U.S. "Hispanic"
population, comprised 2.5% of the U.S. population in 1970 and
about 8.8% in 1994.

4. A North American Amerindian grouping consisting of the
native North American Indian population. This group comprised
.4% of the U.S. population in 1970 and .8% in 1994. This would
not include persons of mixed European and North American Indian
ancestry who are predominantly European and are assimilated into
the European-American population.

5. An East Asian racial grouping consisting of those members
of the Mongoloid Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian races in
North America, and all those in Europe who cannot be practically
or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This
group comprised less than 1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and
about 2.5% in 1994.

6. A non-European Caucasian and racially-mixed grouping consisting
of two major elements or sub-groups:

6.1) A North African and West Asian racial grouping consisting
of all the non-European Caucasian population elements (i.e.,
Caucasian elements of non-European racial type or ancestry) primarily
of North African, Middle-Eastern, Arabic, Anatolian, Central
Asian, Iranian, Afgan, Pakistani, Bangla Deshi and north Indian
racial type and origin, as well as the non-Australoid elements
of central and southern India. This would include the Saharid
(South Mediterranean), Orientalid, Armenid, Turanid (Turkic),
Irano-Afgan, Pakistani and Asian Indian (Indic and Dravidic)
populations in North America, as well as those in Europe who
cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral
homelands. This grouping comprised about 4% of the U.S. population
in 1970 and 4.8% in 1994.

6.2) Europeans with non-European or mixed-race children,
whether natural or adopted, and their non-European mates, who
choose not to be grouped with the non-European race of their
children, but to be grouped with a primarily Caucasian population,
as well as their European close relatives (e.g., the European
grandparents of the mixed-race or non-European child) who choose
to be with them. The inclusion of this large and growing racially-mixed
population element makes this grouping effectively multiracial.
The author estimates that in 2008 about 10% of the children born
to European-American women had non-European fathers. This is
a percentage that has approximately doubled about every twenty
years since 1948 -- from circa 1.2% in 1948, to about 2.5% in
1968, 5% in 1988 and 10% in 2008, and shows every indication
of continued growth.

7. An Australoid grouping that would include all those elements
of primarily Australoid racial composition, consisting primarily
of the Veddoid elements from central and southern India.

8. A grouping of "Afro-Hispanic" Caribbean peoples
of mixed Congoid-Caucasian ancestry who are distinct from the
African-American Congoid population. This grouping would include
most Puerto Ricans and Dominicans as well as many Cubans, Panamanians,
Columbians and Venezuelans. These elements comprised about .7%
of the mainland U.S. population in 1970 and 1.4% in 1994.

As illustrated by the above map, an independent nation for
the Sub-Saharan African racial group (#2 above) could be formed
out of the area of the states of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and
Arkansas north of the Colorado river, west of the Mississippi
river, and south of the Arkansas river. It would include the cities
of Little Rock, Shreveport, Oklahoma City, Dallas, Houston, Galveston,
Austin and Amarillo. Its territory would be about 257,823 square
miles (larger than France, which has an area of 213,009 square
miles, or Kenya, which has an area of 224,081 square miles).

An independent nation for the "Latino" or "Hispanic"
Amerindian and Mestizo racial group (#3 above) could be formed
from the territory of Texas south of the Colorado river, and New
Mexico south of the line of 35 degrees north latitude. It would
include the cities of San Antonio, Corpus Christi, El Paso and
Alamogordo. Its area would total about 198,901 square miles (larger
than Spain, which has an area of 195,988 square miles).

An independent nation for the North American Amerindian population
(#4 above) could be created out of the states of Arizona and New
Mexico north of the line of 35 degrees north latitude and east
of the Little Colorado and Colorado rivers. It would include the
cities of Santa Fe and Albuquerque. Its territory would be about
66,798 square miles.

An independent nation for the East Asian population (#5 above)
could be formed from San Diego, Orange, Riverside and Imperial
counties in California and Yuma county in Arizona. Its area would
be 21,961 square miles (larger than Taiwan, which has 13,814 square
miles) and would include the cities of San Diego, Anaheim, Palm
Springs and Riverside.

The non-European Caucasian and racially-mixed European combined
grouping (#6 above) could be formed into two independent nations.
One could consist of Florida south of the line of 29 degrees latitude
and north of Collier and Broward counties, with an area of about
21,900 square miles (larger by half than the Netherlands, which
has 15,770 square miles). It would include the cities of Palm
Beach, Tampa, Sarasota and Orlando. The other could consist of
San Bernardino, Santa Barbara, Ventura, and Los Angeles counties
in California, Clark county in Nevada, and all of Arizona except
for Yuma county and the territory which is part of the native
Amerindian nation, with an area of about 126,162 square miles
(larger than Italy, which has 116,311 square miles). It would
include the cities of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Las Vegas, Flagstaff,
Winslow, Phoenix and Tucson. The total combined area of both nations
would be about 138,211 square miles.

An independent nation for the Australoid grouping (#7 above)
could be formed from Monterey, San Benito, Fresno, Kings, Tulare,
San Luis Obispo and Kern counties in California. Its area would
be 28,307 square miles (about the same size as the Netherlands
and Belgium added together) and would include the cities of Fresno
and Bakersfield.

An independent nation for the Hispanic-Caribbean peoples of
mixed African-Caucasian ancestry (group #8 above) could be formed
from Broward, Collier, Dade and Monroe counties in Florida north
of Long Key. Its area would be about 6,160 square miles, almost
twice the size of Puerto Rico, which has 3,435 square miles. It
would include the cities of Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Naples.

The Hawaiian islands to the west of Oahu (Kauai, etc.) could
be reserved for the native Pacific Islanders. Oahu and the islands
to the east would belong to the Nordish nation, as the "crossroads
of the Pacific" providing a strategically vital link between
the Nordish countries of North America and those of Australia
and New Zealand.

The remaining territory of the United States would be an independent
nation for the Nordish-centered European racial grouping. Its
population of about 185 million (based on 1994 U.S. population
figures) would be about 78.9% Nordish or Northern European (146
million in 1994), 11.9% Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan or Central European
(22 million in 1994), and 9.2% Euro-Mediterranean or Southern
European (17 million in 1994). To preserve the predominantly Nordish
character and identity of the new European-American nation its
immigration policy should ensure that all future immigrants are
all European and are proportionately at least as Nordish (79%
or more) as the 1994 European-American population.

The land area of the 48 contiguous states is 2,962,031 square
miles. The partition proposal detailed above would allocate 2,234,573
square miles, or 75.4% of this area, to the Nordish-centered European
racial grouping, which comprised 79.7% of the U.S. population
in 1970 and 72% in 1994. It would allocate 727,548 square miles,
or 24.6% of the area of the 48 contiguous states, to the other
racial groups, who in 1994 totaled 28% of the population, but
in 1970 comprised only 20.3% of the population. Thus, this proposal
would grant 75.4% of the area of the 48 contiguous states to the
racial group that was 79.7% of the population in 1970, and 24.6%
of the area to the groups that totaled 20.3% of the population
in 1970.

All of the independent non-European nations resulting from
the racial partition would be situated along the southern periphery
of the United States. As the southern periphery already borders
a non-European country and region (Mexico and the Caribbean) this
would minimize the length of borders between the European and
non-European races. None of the territory allotted to the non-European
nations belonged to the United States before 1803. To prevent
the proliferation of nuclear weapons, any nuclear weapons or production
facilities located in non-European areas would be moved to new
sites within the European area. Prisoners and other institutionalized
persons would go with their race. With the exception of indigenous
peoples, non-European racial elements in the other European countries
of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand would be encouraged
to repatriate to their own racial homelands. If this is not practical
(e.g., if their ancestral homelands block their return) they could
join other members of their race in the appropriate successor
state as given above.