17 Comments

I like the premise of this but I personally have worked for several small corporations that employed less than 50 people and paid all of them well. In fact one of them, an ATM company, was the best paycheck I've made to date. Most (not all) people that back the Anti-people ideas do so because of the media they have chosen to allow influence over them. That media and demographic uses the Christian religion as a hook. As such when you see those Anti-people, you are almost guaranteed a bite if you use the same hook. It's also easy to shut these people down because they don't want to pay for anything but they want everything. Greed is an easy attitude to expose and discredit with their own comments.

It needs refinement but I think you are onto something with replacing our current label system because it uses human nature as an assist. Good show.

I saw where13 dems voted to extend the oil corpoRATs subsidies. They should be on the anti people list. I'll look it up. Of course I would seek to replace them in a primary (which are now over) whith a pro people pol. But I can appreciate the spirit of this valuable effort.

Find the politicians that are supporting bad policy or are introducing bad policy - oppose them.

Find politicians that support or try to introduce good policy and support them.

This is only one part though.

Find and support good issues that are being campaigned - YES - Like the Move to Amend campaign - sign on in support.

The most positive change that can happen in our government - would be to get people working for the people into office = Senate & Congress.

The president is one single person - if the president is a people's president - he can only approve good legislation brought to him - he can do little in the way of stopping bad legislation - he can send it back - he can veto it - but if it is tied to something that must be approved and the time for action has run out - he can only do the best that can be done at the moment.

The key is to only get good legislation in front of the president for approval.

Revolution From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search "Revolt" redirects here. For other uses, see Revolt (disambiguation). For other uses, see Revolution (disambiguation) and Revolutions (disambiguation). Page semi-protected Part of a series on Revolution French Revolution Methods[show] Causes[show] History[show]

A coloured voting box.svg Politics Portal

v
t
e

A revolution (from the Latin revolutio, "a turn around") is a fundamental change in power or organizational structures that takes place in a relatively short period of time. Aristotle described two types of political revolution:

Complete change from one constitution to another

Modification of an existing constitution.[1]

Revolutions have occurred through human history and vary widely in terms of methods, duration, and motivating ideology. Their results include major changes in culture, economy, and socio-political institutions.

Scholarly debates about what does and does not constitute a revolution center around several issues. Early studies of revolutions primarily analyzed events in European history from a psychological perspective, but more modern examinations include global events and incorporate perspectives from several social sciences, including sociology and political science. Several generations of scholarly thought on revolutions have generated many competing theories and contributed much to the current understanding of this complex phenomenon.