The Weiner Emails: What’s Being Missed

Remember back during the 2016 campaign, when Leakin’ James Comey assured us that the hundreds of thousands of Clinton emails found on Spanky Weiner’s laptop were meticulously examined at breakneck speed thanks to the “wizardry of technology”? Remember how you, me and everyone else with an IQ above room temperature suspected that maybe he wasn’t being totally forthcoming?

Well I’ll be darned — we were right.

Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations, who honestly should be competing with Sara Carter for a Pulitzer for the recent work he’s done regarding government corruption, recently published compelling evidence indicating that, yes, Comey did expedite the end of the Hillzdawg probe based on political motivations. And yes, he lied about the contents of the Spanky trove being investigated. In reality, they barely scratched the surface of what’d been found.

.

Here is the beef, taken directly from Sperry’s report:

Comey later told Congress that “thanks to the wizardry of our technology,” the FBI was able to eliminate the vast majority of messages as “duplicates” of emails they’d previously seen. Tireless agents, he claimed, then worked “night after night after night” to scrutinize the remaining material.

But virtually none of his account was true, a growing body of evidence reveals.

In fact, a technical glitch prevented FBI technicians from accurately comparing the new emails with the old emails. Only 3,077 of the 694,000 emails were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information. Three FBI officials completed that work in a single 12-hour spurt the day before Comey again cleared Clinton of criminal charges.

But man, it gets worse.

Even the tiny sliver of emails that were actually checked contained extremely sensitive classified information. Some of it may even qualify for Special Access Program (SAP) status. That means it deals with information on our enemies, some of which quite possibly taken from human sources, or HUMINT.

“Contradicting Comey’s testimony, this included highly sensitive information dealing with Israel and the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas,” Sperry reports. “The former secretary of state, however, was never confronted with the sensitive new information and it was never analyzed for damage to national security.”

Absolutely incredible.

.

This could be anything from information derived from Mossad agents undercover inside Hamas to what we know about their future missile plans to how Israel is planning to leverage themselves in upcoming negotiations. It’s all extremely important information that has dire consequences if leaked. Yes, Hillary should be in prison. She should be starting her third year behind bars, actually.

.

.

To add to this already investigation-worthy monstrosity, Sperry also reveals that no intelligence officials were alerted so as to analyze possible damage to national security:

Even though the unique classified material was improperly stored and transmitted on an unsecured device, the FBI did not refer the matter to U.S. intelligence agencies to determine if national security had been compromised, as required under a federally mandated “damage assessment” directive.

The newly discovered classified material “was never previously sent out to the relevant original classification authorities for security review,” the official, who spoke to RealClearInvestigations on the condition of anonymity, said.

In the good ole days we used to call that dereliction of duty.

According to the report, Comey was lying through his sanctimonious teeth when he testified before Congress that the case had been wrapped. Very important parts of the probe were indeed ongoing. That big white lie pales in comparison, though, to the charge levied by an agent directly involved with the probe. Sperry’s FBI source explicitly accuses the bureau of hiding evidence on behalf of Hillary.

“One career FBI special agent involved in the case complained to New York colleagues that officials in Washington tried to ‘bury’ the new trove of evidence, which he believed contained the full archive of Clinton’s emails — including long-sought missing messages from her first months at the State Department,” Sperry writes.

This is unreal.

.

HELLO GOP CONGRESS. DO YOU WANT TO MAYBE COMMUNICATE WITH THIS FBI AGENT THROUGH SPERRY IN ORDER TO OFFER HIM WHISTLEBLOWER STATUS? IF YOU DO THAT, HE CAN GET A FREE LAWYER AND PROTECTION FROM CAREER BLOWBACK. IT MAY ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO COME FORWARD AS WELL. JUST A THOUGHT.

.

.

.

.

BIG PICTURE:

.

.

Let’s not waste anymore time airing our frustration with the lack of prosecution. Rather, let’s look at what’s implicated by this latest info dump. Sometimes, the genesis of information is more important than the information itself. It tells the tale of how the story will unfold. With that in mind, let’s use logical inference/deduction to arrive at a larger understanding of what’s happening.

.

As I’ve suspected for a long time now, white hats on the inside are talking (at the very least). This information didn’t magically appear out of thin air. And the fact that there is exact data here (3K out of 700K emails searched) indicates someone who is indeed intimately involved with the investigation. The exact figures lend credibility to the story because they’re falsifiable. The FBI could correct the record at any moment, and #BelieveMe, they would love to. But they can’t, because they know this person has the goods.

.

Secondly, does this info leak have anything whatsoever to do with the ongoing probe into the Clinton Foundation? Oftentimes, when information like this is circulating after a long pause, it’s the result of an investigation bearing fruit. In other words, it wouldn’t be turning up if people weren’t stirring it up, and information of that sort isn’t stirred up by Zeke from the Creek. Sperry cites more than one inside source for his story, as he quotes one in claiming that evidence was hidden and a different one for the information regarding the email numbers.

.

This info isn’t coming from a lone white hat whistleblower, it’s being passed around between people with a great deal of informational access. Like, say, investigators. And bear with me for a moment, because this isn’t nearly as far-fetched as it may seem at first notion: there is a decent chance that some of the original Hillary investigators are working on the current Hillary probe. And no, that’s not a bad thing. We already know that one of Sperry’s sources worked on the original sham probe (the one now blowing the whistle on evidence-burying).

There have been myriad reports over the last two years of agents who were disgruntled about the way that probe was handled. This was a “7th floor special,” meaning the guys at the top ensured that it would go nowhere despite what was discovered. The guys and gals doing the discovering don’t necessarily appreciate that. Not everyone in the FBI is corrupt. What are the odds that the Hillary investigator used for Sperry’s report is happy to help an online political magazine but is being of no assistance whatsoever with the current crew investigating the Clinton Foundation from the Little Rock field office?

.

And this begs the question: Was Jeff Sessions truly in the dark about this information?

.

Did he, like most of us, only just now learn it from Sperry’s report? I understand the perception of him as shiftless and worthless, but I have a hard time believing that he’s completely in the dark on this. Let’s assume for a moment that this leak has nothing to do with the Sessions-appointed investigations. Are we then to believe that this FBI agent has reached out to Sperry and no one else? If Sessions is truly unaware of this, he has a far worse handle on the DOJ than previously feared. But as easy as it would be to believe that, I don’t.

.

In my estimation, our time is better spent getting to the bottom of how this information is being leaked, why and with whose authority than groaning about perceived inaction. The fact that we’re learning this information at all suggests that there is much more going on than we may suspect.

.

.

.

.

.

Donations

Hi everyone, if you enjoyed this article and feel that I’ve earned a tip, I would greatly appreciate any help you can give. If you would like to give more than $3, simply change the number in the box to multiply the donation. If not, I still love you and keep up the good fight!