Sites like ATS are monitored by an analyst and assigned a threat level

Any evidence? Proof? You know, anyone can come up here, spend a few hours making up stories about how analysts are supposed to read every post here in
ATS and write up a good strory just to get some stars.

Really if there was no proof of this happening then this isn't happening. Who the heck are you trying claim the stuff that you simply wrote has any
truth in it? Where do you exactly found this out? Any evidence to go with it?

There are a lot of bored people on ATS making stuff up, just look at Skunk Works. Endless of useless, unproven baseless fallacies with nothing to
support iit other than mere WORDS. WORDS.

No evidence, no proof, then your post is just a bunch of BS. I hate to say this to you but if you don't have anything better than just your words as
evidence
then your post is no better than some kid claiming to see shape shifting reptilians on TV.

You are getting a lot of stars because people WANT to believe, but doesn't want to know whether it's the truth or not, and doesn't give a rat's
behind if a proof exists or not to support the claim.

Here is a typical thought pattern of a gullible ATS member:

"I want to believe this. I don't care if there wasn't any evidence. It fits my perception of how things should be in my mind, it must be true. If
it fancies my hunger for anything with shady people sitting in a room conspiring against the world then you are the truth! A star for you bro!"

Never once did I say they read every single post. Never once did I say they sit on ATS all day. I said sites LIKE ATS, again I used ATS as an
EXAMPLE, because most people on here are most familiar with it. To be honest like I stated before, I did not know it would turn into this. I thought
I might get one reply and people would move on.

IT SEEMS that ATS has become a space where people feel glorified by flags and stars. I am sorry if that has tainted your mind. This is cyber space.
I CAN CARE LESS about a star or flag. How does that further my lifes goals, what does this do to me, how does this advance my life?

Are you sure that you work for the government? Because if you dont know the difference between the SIPR and NIPR net, then I really have to question
what you say is real or not. Anyone, and I mean anyone who is around either of these 2 networks would know the difference....even if they just mop
the floors.

And to say that you dont have to have a clearance to access the SIPRnet is laughable. You absolutely do have to have a secret security clearance to
access it.....and having someone with no clearance log onto it would be a huge security breach.

So judging by your complete lack of knowledge on the subject I am coming to 1 of 2 conclusions.

1. You are totally full of crap and do not work for the government at all or...
2. You may work in some low level unclassified ho-hom government job that does nothing important at all, and you have heard some co-workers talk about
other things that only have a grain of knowledge about.

The things you state in your post are just the most simple, elementary facts about working the classified government jobs, that I have to believe that
you are full of it.

If you can tell me how to prove this, then I will. I can't go into one of these rooms and bring live interviews or photos, that would be treason. I
give you a task. Befriend an intelligence officer and ask them. They have their limits in what they can and what they can't say. But, just ask him
about this, when you get your answer, then you have it.

By the way, something that Jhill did not mention about Government Agents or Entities or Assigns, is that Security Clearance information is given on a
Need to Know basis. You might know several folks in the spook squad, but anything relayed to you may either be a lie or a fabrication or the truth,
based on your security clearance rating and your need to know.

Your post is not only insulting to ADVISOR but to the entire staff, by inferring that we would allow a mod to post false information. ADVISOR does
indeed work for the government. The rest of the content in your post and it's tone leaves much to be desired. You may want to take that into account
in further posting.

No, I am saying he is incorrect on the clearance issue on the computer systems. For the rest of the stuff that is between you guys. I provided the
powerpoint for a clarification, a government powerpoint that confirms the clearance issue on a government website.

This thread is still useless. As it sets a stage for more disinfo.
I'll admit now I've been monitoring ATS for at least 3 years now.
But by admitting this no one will believe me.
It's likely this post will be passed over.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.