nmm 22 4500ICPSR02826MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02826MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1998
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
1999-11-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2826NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program measures
levels of and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in
the United States. The ADAM Program is a redesigned version of the Drug
Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN
THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]), upgraded methodologically
and expanded to include 35 cities. The data address the following
topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on self-reports
and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs, (3)
self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the relationship
between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5) the
relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and
indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the
project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees
is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age,
race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge
at the time of booking. The recently modified ADAM/DUF interview
instrument (used for part of the 1995 DUF data and all of the DUF
1996, DUF 1997, and ADAM 1998 data) also collected information about
the arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type,
arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at
which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within
the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the
past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the
drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the
interview. Data from the new interview instrument also included
information about whether arrestees had ever injected drugs and
whether they were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed
the crimes for which they were arrested. The data also include
information about whether the arrestee had been to an emergency room
for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had prior arrests in
the last 12 months. Data that continue to be collected with the new
version of the ADAM/DUF interview provide information about arrestees'
histories of drug/alcohol treatment, including whether they ever
received drug/alcohol treatment and whether they needed drug/alcohol
treatment. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked to
provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of the
following ten drug types: marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone,
benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon),
barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines
were confirmed by gas chromatography).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1
drug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2826Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02826.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02994MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02994MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 1999
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2994NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, the
successor to the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program (DRUG USE
FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR
9477]), measures levels of and trends in drug use among persons
arrested and booked in 35 sites across the United States. The data address the
following topics: (1) types of drugs used by arrestees (based on
self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported dependency on drugs,
(3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug treatment, (4) the
relationship between drug use and certain types of offenses, and (5)
the relationship between self-reported indicators of drug use and
indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation in the
project is voluntary, and all information collected from the arrestees
is anonymous and confidential. The data include the arrestee's age,
race, gender, educational attainment, marital status, and the charge
at the time of booking. The modified ADAM/DUF interview
instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the 1996, 1997,
1998, and 1999 data) also collected information about the arrestee's
use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day
drug use), age at first use, and whether the arrestee had ever been
dependent on drugs. As part of the ADAM program, arrestees were asked
to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of
ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone,
benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon),
barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines
were confirmed by gas chromatography).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2994Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02994.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03270MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03270MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2000
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3270NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
thadone, methaqualone,
barbiturates, amphetamines, and methamphetamine. The adult data files
include several derived variables. The male data also include four
sampling weights, and stratum identifications and percents. For the
juvenile data, demographic variables include age, race, sex,
educational attainment, employment status, and living
circumstances. Data also include each juvenile arrestee's
self-reported use of 15 drugs (alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, powder
cocaine, crack, heroin, PCP, amphetamines, barbiturates, quaaludes,
methadone, crystal methamphetamine, Valium, LSD, and inhalants). For
each drug type, arrestees reported whether they had ever used the
drug, age of first use, whether they had used the drug in the past 30
days and past 72 hours, number of days they used the drug in past
month, whether they tried to cut down or quit using the drug, if they
were successful, whether they felt dependent on the drug, whether they
were receiving treatment for the drug, whether they had received
treatment for the drug in the past, and whether they thought they
could use treatment for that drug. Additional variables include
whether juvenile respondents had ever injected drugs, whether they
were influenced by drugs when they allegedly committed the crime for
which they were arrested, whether they had been to an emergency room
for drug-related incidents, and if so, whether in the past 12 months,
and information on arrests and charges in the past 12 months. As with
the adult data, urine test results are also provided. Finally,
variables covering precinct (precinct of arrest) and law (penal law
code associated with the crime for which the juvenile was arrested)
are also provided for use by local law enforcement officials at each
site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3270Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03270.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03688MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03688MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3688NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM)
Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use
in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were
collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year
in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program
adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male
(Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in
juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile
instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE
FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also
continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in
adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male
adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling
stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2)
ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the
case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs,
(5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs,
(7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains
demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued
use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3688Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03815MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03815MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3815NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention
facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from
previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series
(ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of
probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which
was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes
weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For
the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1)
demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based)
data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a
verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and
mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use,
abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most
commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights.
The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's
self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other
drug-related behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3815Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04020MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04020MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4020NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the
use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult
facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult
sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification
of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM
facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case,
including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5)
data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7)
urine test results, and (8) for males, weights.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4020Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28141MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28141MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Project in Rural Nebraska, 1998
[electronic resource]
Denise C. Herz
2011-01-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR28141NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
A pilot outreach project of the National Intstitute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, the rural Nebraska ADAM program examined the prevalence and type of arrestee drug use in four rural Nebraska counties and compared the results to those found in Omaha, Nebraska, an established ADAM site. The data were collected in Madison (n=78), Dawson (n=50), Hall (n=53), and Scotts Bluff (n=149) counties, and Omaha, Nebraska, (n=202) in October and November of 1998. The catchment area for Omaha was the central city. The ADAM interview provided demographic and descriptive data, including race, age, marital status, source of income, screens of substance abuse and dependency, treatment history, arrest and incarceration experiences, and participation in local drug markets. At the conclusion of the interview, respondents were asked to provide a urine specimen. The current study included a supplemental questionnaire about methamphetamine use. The methamphetamine addendum included variables on why the respondent began and continued the use of methamphetamines, how often and how much methamphetamine was used, if and why the respondent had ever sought and completed treatment, source of the methamphetamine, and if the respondent had ever made or sold methamphetamine.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramHerz, Denise C.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28141Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28141.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30061MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30061MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2011-02-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30061NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeHunt, Dana Rhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30061Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32321MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2011-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramHunt, DanaRhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03541MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03541MiAaIMiAaI
Assessing the Texas Christian University Drug Screen Instrument with Texas Department of Criminal Justice Inmates, 1999-2000
[electronic resource]
Kevin D. Knight
,
Dwayne Simpson
,
Janis Rhodes
2003-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3541NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The overall purpose of this study was to examine the
psychometric properties and credibility of the Texas Christian
University (TCU) Drug Screen as an instrument to assess drug use
severity for treatment referral decisions in correctional
settings. TCU Drug Screen data were collected on 18,364 Texas
Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) inmates (15,816 males and 2,548
females) who completed the screen between January 1 and April 30,
1999. Of the 18,364 subjects, 13,902 were Institutional Division
(TDCJ-ID) inmates and 4,462 were State Jail Division (TDCJ-SJD)
inmates. The TCU Drug Screen was administered by TDCJ staff almost
exclusively in a small group setting (12-25 inmates per group) as part
of a larger battery of assessments during the intake process at a TDCJ
facility. The level and intensity of treatment services needed was
then determined and a referral decision was made. As part of this
study, the relationship between TCU Drug Screen information and
post-release reincarceration was examined. Although one original goal
in the study was to assess the comparability, or concurrent validity,
of the TCU Drug Screen with the lengthier, more comprehensive
Addiction Severity Index (ASI), TDCJ changed the administration
protocol for the ASI so that it was given only to a subsample of 3,245
inmates who failed to disclose drug use problems on the TCU Drug
Screen. The data include inmate responses to all items of the TCU Drug
Screen and the overall drug screen score. There is also demographic
information as well as incarceration, release, and reincarceration
data.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1
drug treatmenticpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmatesicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtesting and measurementicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrtreatment programsicpsraddictionicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeKnight, Kevin D.Simpson, DwayneRhodes, JanisInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3541Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03541.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02730MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02730MiAaIMiAaI
Assessment of a Single-Purpose Substance Abuse Facility for Committed Juvenile Offenders in Virginia, 1995-1997
[electronic resource]
Jill A. Gordon
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2730NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The objective of this data collection was to provide a
preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of treatment offered at
the Barrett Juvenile Correctional Center, a substance abuse treatment
facility in Virginia for convicted male offenders that began operation
in late 1993. The center uses a holistic approach in the treatment of
youth to identify the triggers for substance abuse and to investigate
the relationship between substance abuse and delinquent behavior. For
the facility assessment, various types of data from the Virginia
Department of Juvenile Justice were gathered. Baseline data on each
juvenile were obtained from the department's Reception and Diagnostic
Center and consisted of demographic information and I.Q. scores,
criminal history, and substance abuse history. Demographic variables
include the youth's race, last grade placement, and with whom the
youth lived. Youths' scores on standardized tests were also compiled,
including SASSI, verbal I.Q., performance I.Q., and full-scale
I.Q. scores. Criminal histories covered whether the committing offense
was a felony or misdemeanor, the type of committing offense, the total
number of committing offenses, whether a prior offense was a felony or
a misdemeanor, the type of prior offense, the total number of prior
offenses, the age at first criminal adjudication, age at commitment,
and degree of delinquency. Alcohol and drug use data focused on the
age at which alcohol was first used, number of times alcohol was used
in the past year, age at which marijuana was first used, number of
times marijuana was used in the past month, and whether the youth ever
used cocaine, crack, inhalants, speed, depressants, hallucinogens, or
other drugs. Another source of information was the youths' parole
officers, who provided data on youths' criminal offending status and
substance abuse at three, six, and twelve months after release from
the center. Data obtained from parole officers assessing youths'
improvement after leaving the center include whether they were
rearrested, the type of offense if rearrested, the total number of
offenses rearrested for, disposition, most serious offense overall,
and youths' overall drug use.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1
treatment outcomesicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrdrug law offensesicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemGordon, Jill A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2730Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02730.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04439MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04439MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Tribal Justice Agencies, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-07-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4439NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study compiles data on the law enforcement, courts and
administration, corrections and intermediate sanctions, criminal
history records, and justice statistics of the federally recognized
American Indian tribal governing bodies. The data determine which
tribes have sworn law enforcement personnel and the source of
authority, what the number and type of tribal court systems are, who
performs the tribal detention function and what types of sanctions are
imposed. It also looks at whether tribes have access to state and
national criminal record systems.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04439.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrcorrectionsicpsrcorrections managementicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrinmatesicpsrjail inmatesicpsrjailsicpsrNative Americansicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrprobationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNACJD IX. PoliceICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeRCMD IX.F. Native AmericanUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4439Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04439.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20352MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20352MiAaIMiAaI
Characteristics of Arrestees at Risk for Co-Existing Substance Abuse and Mental Disorder in Cleveland, Ohio, 2003
[electronic resource]
Sonia A. Alemagno
,
Elizabeth Shaffer-King
,
Peggy Tonkin
,
Rachel Hammel
2009-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR20352NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The current study was conducted as a supplemental study to the Cleveland/Cuyahoga County Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program in the second quarter of 2003 (April-June). A risk screening instrument was implemented to classify Cleveland/Cuyahoga County adult arrestees into four groups: arrestees at no risk for substance abuse or dependence or mental disorder; arrestees at risk for substance abuse or dependence with no risk for mental disorder; arrestees at risk for mental disorder with no risk for substance abuse or dependence; and arrestees at risk for both mental disorder and substance abuse or dependence. A total of 311 adult arrestees were interviewed and provided a urine sample submitted for testing. The dual risk screening instrument includes six mental disorder risk questions and six substance abuse risk questions. The mental disorder risk questions include questions on having feelings or emotions that make it difficult to complete normal day to day activities, feeling hopeless or depressed, having thoughts of hurting oneself or committing suicide, and hearing or seeing things that others cannot hear or see. The substance abuse risk questions include questions on problems caused by drinking or drug use, arrests due to alcohol or drug use, time spent on thinking about or trying to get alcohol or drugs, and feelings of guilt about drinking or drug use.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20352.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsraddictionicpsralcohol abuseicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrmental disordersicpsrmental health servicesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemAlemagno, Sonia A.Shaffer-King, ElizabethTonkin, Peggy Hammel, RachelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20352Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20352.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33921MiAaIMiAaI
Comprehensive Investigation of the Role of Individuals, the Immediate Social Environment, and Neighborhoods in Trajectories of Adolescent Antisocial Behavior in Chicago, Illinois, 1994-2002
[electronic resource]
Christopher Sullivan
2012-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The overall goal of this study was to acquire a greater understanding of the development of adolescent antisocial behavior using data from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN). Longitudinal cohort data from PHDCN were analyzed to assess patterns of substance use and delinquency across three waves for three age cohorts and 78 neighborhoods. This analysis of existing PHDCN data used multiple cohort and multilevel latent growth models as well as several ancillary approaches to answer questions pertinent to the development of adolescent antisocial behavior.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33921.v1
adolescentsicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdrug useicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsroffendersicpsrparental influenceicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsocial environmenticpsrsocial influencesicpsrsocial supporticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrviolent crimeicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD II. Community StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSullivan, ChristopherInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33921.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03986MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03986MiAaIMiAaI
Correlates and Consequences of Juvenile Exposure to Violence in the United States, 1995
[electronic resource]
Stacey Nofziger
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3986NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined the effect of exposure to violence on
juveniles. It was specifically concerned with juveniles' perceptions
of violence in schools and communities and how exposure to violence
served as a risk factor for juvenile drug and alcohol use and
participation in other delinquent activities. It also sought to
develop a more complete picture of the context and consequences of
violence in schools. The data for this study were drawn from the
NATIONAL SURVEY OF ADOLESCENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995 (ICPSR
2833). The data were collected through a national probability
telephone sample of 4,023 juveniles and their parents or guardians.
The current study drew primarily on the questions that were asked
about respondents' experiences witnessing violence, their own
victimization, peer and family deviance, their own delinquent
activities, and drug and alcohol use.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03986.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrfamily violenceicpsrjuvenilesicpsrschool violenceicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrviolenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNofziger, StaceyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3986Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03986.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02564MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02564MiAaIMiAaI
Crack, Powder Cocaine, and Heroin
[electronic resource] Drug Purchase and Use Patterns in Six Cities in the United States, 1995-1996
K. Jack Riley
2012-08-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2564NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was designed to address the practical and policy
implications of various drug market participation patterns. In 1995,
the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and the National
Institute of Justice (NIJ) collaborated on a project called the
Procurement Study. This study was executed as an addendum to NIJ's
Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program (DRUG USE FORECASTING IN 24 CITIES
IN THE UNITED STATES, 1987-1997 [ICPSR 9477]) with the goal of
extending previous research in which heroin users were interviewed on
various aspects of drug market activity. The present study sought to
explore additional features of drug market participation and use, both
within and across drug types and cities, and included two additional
drugs -- powder cocaine and crack cocaine. Data were collected from
recently arrested users of powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin
in six DUF cities (Chicago, New York, Portland, San Diego, San
Antonio, and Washington, DC). Each of the three files in this
collection, Crack Data (Part 1), Heroin Data (Part 2), and Powder
Cocaine Data (Part 3), is comprised of data from a procurement
interview, urine test variables, and a DUF interview. During the
procurement interview, information was collected on purchase and use
patterns for specific drugs. Variables from the procurement interview
include the respondent's method of using the drug, the term used to
refer to the drug, whether the respondent bought the drug in the
neighborhood, the number of different dealers the respondent bought
the drug from, how the respondent made the connection with the dealer
(i.e., street, house, phone, beeper, business/store, or friends),
their main drug source, whether the respondent went to someone else if
the source was not available, how the respondent coped with not being
able to find drugs to buy, whether the respondent got the drug for
free, the means by which the respondent obtained money, the quantity
and packaging of the drug, and the number of minutes spent searching
for, traveling to, and waiting for their last purchase. Urine tests
screened for the presence of ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates,
cocaine, PCP, methadone, benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone,
propoxyphene (Darvon), barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test
results for amphetamines were confirmed by gas chromatography). Data
from the DUF interview provide detailed information about each
arrestee's self-reported use of 15 drugs. For each drug type,
arrestees were asked whether they had ever used the drug, the age at
which they first used the drug, whether they had used the drug within
the past three days, how many days they had used the drug within the
past month, whether they had ever needed or felt dependent on the
drug, and whether they were dependent on the drug at the time of the
interview. Data from the DUF interview instrument also included
alcohol/drug treatment history, information about whether arrestees
had ever injected drugs, and whether they were influenced by drugs
when the crime that they were charged with was committed. The data
also include information about whether the arrestee had been to an
emergency room for drug-related incidents and whether he or she had
had prior arrests in the past 12 months. Demographic data include the
age, race, sex, educational attainment, marital status, employment
status, and living circumstances of each respondent.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrestsicpsrcocaineicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrheroinicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRiley, K. JackInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2564Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02564.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09964MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09964MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Careers, Criminal Violence, and Substance Abuse in California, 1963-1983
[electronic resource]
Ernst Wenk
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR9964NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the criminal
career patterns of violent offenders. These data are intended to
facilitate the development of models to predict recidivism and
violence, and to construct parole supervision programs. Original data
were collected on young male offenders in 1964 and 1965 as they
entered the California Youth Authority (CYA). At this time, data were
collected on criminal history, including current offenses, drug and
alcohol use, psychological and personality variables, and sentencing, and
demographics such as age, education, work experience, and family
structure. The data collection also contains results from a number of
standardized psychological instruments: California Psychological
Inventory, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, California
Achievement Test Battery, General Aptitude Test Battery, Army General
Classification Test, and the Revised Beta Test. After release from the
CYA and over the following 20 years, subsequent arrest information
was collected on the offenders, including the nature of the offense,
disposition, and arrest and parole dates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09964.v1
arrest recordsicpsrcareer criminalsicpsrcrime predictionicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcriminality predictionicpsrmale offendersicpsrparoleicpsrpersonality assessmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrviolent crimeicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemWenk, ErnstInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9964Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09964.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06122MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1994 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06122MiAaIMiAaI
Criminal Histories and Criminal Justice Processing of Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Sample Members in Washington, DC, 1989-1991
[electronic resource]
Jay Carver
,
Eric Wish
,
Douglas A. Smith
,
Christina Polsenberg
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1994ICPSR6122NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data provide information on the relationship between
arrestee drug tests and future criminality once other risk factors,
such as prior criminal history, are accounted for. Also explored is
whether the association between drug test results and future offending
varies depending upon the attributes of individual offenders. The
dataset contains information drawn from the Pretrial Services Agency
(PSA) in Washington, DC, and the National Institute of Justice's Drug
Use Forecasting (DUF) program. Data are available from each source for
1989 and 1990 with subsequent arrest data provided by PSA through
August 1991. The 1989-1990 data supplied by PSA contain information on
criminal history and drug test results taken at the time of arrest.
Data provided from the DUF program include drug test results from a
sample of persons arrested as well as information obtained from
arrestee interviews on items such as family and work status. The
combined data contain the arrestees' demographic characteristics,
arrest and charge information, prior criminal history, and subsequent
offending. Drugs tested for include cocaine, opiates, methadone, PCP,
amphetamines, barbiturates, marijuana, methaqualone, Darvon, and
Valium. In addition, self-reported information regarding an
individual's use of and dependency on these drugs is supplied.
Demographic information includes age, sex, income, and employment
status. Due to changes in the DUF measurement instrument from 1989 to
1990, the variables contained in the two data files are not completely
identical.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06122.v1
substance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrgun useicpsrhandgunsicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemCarver, JayWish, EricSmith, Douglas A.Polsenberg, ChristinaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6122Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06122.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09236MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09236MiAaIMiAaI
Cross-Validation of the Iowa Offender Risk Assessment Model in Michigan, 1980-1982
[electronic resource]
Richard Alfred Bradshaw
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR9236NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data were collected in an attempt to cross-validate
the 1984 and 1985 versions of the Iowa model for assessing risk of
offending while on parole by applying the model to a Michigan sample of
male parolees over a follow-up period of two and one-half years.
Different measures of predictors such as prior criminal history,
current offense, substance abuse history, age, and recidivism on parole
are available. The first file contains information on parolees such as
demographic characteristics, drug use history, prior criminal history,
risk scores, and parole history. The second file includes parolees'
detailed criminal histories including the total number of violent and
nonviolent felony arrests and dates, and charges and dispositions of
each arrest with a maximum of eight arrests.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09236.v1
substance abuseicpsrageicpsrcrime predictionicpsrcriminal historiesicpsroffensesicpsrparoleicpsrparoleesicpsrrecidivismicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemBradshaw, Richard AlfredInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9236Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09236.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09919MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09919MiAaIMiAaI
Deterring Drug Use With Intensive Probation in New Jersey, 1989-1990
[electronic resource]
Frank S. Pearson
2002-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9919NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data were collected to measure the degree to which
subjective deterrence and rational choice are effective in reducing
drug-use recidivism rates. Baseline interviews were conducted with
participants upon entering a drug rehabilitation program in New
Jersey. Under the terms of this program, which was an alternative to
prison, any incident of drug use occurring during the rehabilitation
period would result in the participant's returning to
prison. Follow-up interviews were conducted when the participant
either had a drug/alcohol use relapse or successfully completed a year
in the program without a drug-use incident. Baseline interviews
included questions about criminal and drug-use history, as well as
initial reactions to the drug rehabilitation program. Follow-up
interviews probed for participants' feelings about the drug
rehabilitation program experience. Further questions concerned
participants' failure or success at staying away from drugs or
alcohol.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09919.v1
recidivismicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsralternatives to institutionalizationicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdeterrenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrprobationicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimePearson, Frank S.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9919Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09919.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09325MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09325MiAaIMiAaI
Disturbed Violent Offenders in New York, 1985
[electronic resource]
Hans Toch
,
Kenneth Adams
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9325NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection was designed to investigate the
relationship between mental illness and violent involvement over an
offender's criminal career and to develop a typology of violent
offenders that takes into account both mental health history and
substance use history. The collection is organized so that data for the
violent offender cohort can be matched with records of offender mental
health history, substance abuse history, and criminal career history.
The offenders were convicted of statutorily-defined "violent
offenses." Included in the collection are variables concerning
conviction offenses, intoxication status, victim-offender relationship,
injury result, type of violence, employment, marital status, gender,
and race. The criminal history file contains variables on dates of
arrest or juvenile contacts. The mental history file includes dates of
entry and types of mental health services received.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09325.v2
career criminalsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsroffendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrviolenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyToch, HansAdams, KennethInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9325Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09325.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03585MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03585MiAaIMiAaI
Domestic Violence and Substance Abuse Among the Arrestee Population in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1999-2001
[electronic resource]
Paul Guerin
2003-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3585NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The focus of this study was to examine levels of aggressive
behavior during incidents of domestic violence in relation to
self-reported drug and alcohol use among an arrestee population from
Bernalillo County in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The research questions
motivating this project were: (1) Are acts of domestic violence
committed while the offender is taking illicit psychoactive substances,
as ascertained by self-reports? (2) For those individuals with domestic
violence charges, do urinalyses conducted within 48 hours of an
individual's arrest indicate the recent use of a psychoactive substance?
(3) Which substances are most prevalently associated with incidents of
domestic violence? (4) Is there a difference in levels of aggressive
behavior that is dependent on the individual? (5) Does the severity of
domestic violence increase with the presence of psychoactive substances?
(6) What differences (if any) exists between batterers who take
psychoactive substances and batterers who do not? The data for this
research were collected in conjunction with the National Institute of
Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs. The domestic
violence survey addendum was administered to all arrestees from
Bernalillo County in Albuquerque, New Mexico, who had completed the ADAM
interview and provided a urine specimen and were willing to answer
additional questions concerning domestic violence. Variables from the
ADAM instruments were comprised of demographic data on each arrestee,
calendar of admissions to drug treatment-related programs, data on
dependence and abuse, drug market and use data, and urine test results.
Variables from the domestic violence addendum include demographics on
the intimate partner, whether specific physical events occurred, whether
specific injuries had been sustained by both arrestee and partner, and
the specific circumstances surrounding the physical abuse event.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03585.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsraggressionicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrdrug useicpsroffendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramGuerin, PaulInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3585Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03585.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02756MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02756MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), 1994
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2756NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) survey is designed to
capture data on emergency department (ED) episodes that are induced by
or related to the use of an illicit, prescription, or over-the-counter
drug. For purposes of this collection, a drug "episode" is an ED visit
that was induced by or related to the use of an illegal drug or the
nonmedical use of a legal drug for patients aged six years and
older. A drug "mention" refers to a substance that was mentioned
during a drug-related ED episode. Because up to four drugs can be
reported for each drug abuse episode, there are more mentions than
episodes in the data. Individual persons may also be included more
than once in the data. Within each facility participating in DAWN, a
designated reporter, usually a member of the emergency department or
medical records staff, was responsible for identifying drug-related
episodes and recording and submitting data on each case. An episode
report was submitted for each patient visiting a DAWN emergency
department whose presenting problem(s) was/were related to their own
drug use. DAWN produces estimates of drug-related emergency department
visits for 50 specific drugs, drug categories, or combinations of
drugs, including the following: acetaminophen, alcohol in combination
with other drugs, alprazolam, amitriptyline, amphetamines, aspirin,
cocaine, codeine, diazepam, diphenhydramine, fluoxetine,
heroin/morphine, inhalants/solvents/aerosols, LSD, lorazepam,
marijuana/hashish, methadone, methamphetamine, and PCP/PCP in
combination with other drugs. The use of alcohol alone is not
reported. The route of administration and form of drug used (e.g.,
powder, tablet, liquid) are included for each drug. Data collected for
DAWN also include drug use motive and total drug mentions in the
episode, as well as race, age, patient disposition, reason for ED
visit, and day of the week, quarter, and year of episode.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02756.v2
demographic characteristicsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug overdoseicpsrdrug useicpsremergenciesicpsremergency servicesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhospitalizationicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA VIII. Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2756Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02756.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02834MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02834MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), 1997
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2834NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) survey is designed to
capture data on emergency department (ED) episodes that are induced by
or related to the use of an illicit, prescription, or over-the-counter
drug. For purposes of this collection, a drug "episode" is an ED visit
that was induced by or related to the use of an illegal drug or the
nonmedical use of a legal drug for patients aged six years and
older. A drug "mention" refers to a substance that was mentioned
during a drug-related ED episode. Because up to four drugs can be
reported for each drug abuse episode, there are more mentions than
episodes in the data. Individual persons may also be included more
than once in the data. Within each facility participating in DAWN, a
designated reporter, usually a member of the emergency department or
medical records staff, was responsible for identifying drug-related
episodes and recording and submitting data on each case. An episode
report was submitted for each patient visiting a DAWN emergency
department whose presenting problem(s) was/were related to their own
drug use. DAWN produces estimates of drug-related emergency department
visits for 50 specific drugs, drug categories, or combinations of
drugs, including the following: acetaminophen, alcohol in combination
with other drugs, alprazolam, amitriptyline, amphetamines, aspirin,
cocaine, codeine, diazepam, diphenhydramine, fluoxetine,
heroin/morphine, inhalants/solvents/aerosols, LSD, lorazepam,
marijuana/hashish, methadone, methamphetamine, and PCP/PCP in
combination with other drugs. The use of alcohol alone is not
reported. The route of administration and form of drug used (e.g.,
powder, tablet, liquid) are included for each drug. Data collected for
DAWN also include drug use motive and total drug mentions in the
episode, as well as race, age, patient disposition, reason for ED
visit, and day of the week, quarter, and year of episode.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02834.v2
emergency servicesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhospitalizationicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug overdoseicpsrdrug useicpsremergenciesicpsrSAMHDA VIII. Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2834Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02834.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09686MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09686MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Testing of Juvenile Detainees to Identify High-Risk Youth in Florida, 1986-1987
[electronic resource]
Richard Dembo
2002-06-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9686NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection examines the interrelationships among
drug/alcohol use, childhood sexual or physical abuse, and encounters
with the juvenile justice system. To identify high-risk individuals,
youths in a Tampa juvenile detention center were given urine tests and
were asked a series of questions about past sexual and/or physical
abuse. Official record searches were also conducted 6, 12, and 18
months afterward to measure later encounters with the juvenile or
criminal justice systems. The investigators used the youths' urine
test results as the primary measure of drug use. On the basis of their
review of Florida's statutes, the investigators developed outcome
measures for the following offense categories: violent felonies
(murder/manslaughter, robbery, sex offenses, aggravated assault),
property felonies (arson, burglary, auto theft, larceny/theft, stolen
property offenses, damaging property offenses), drug felonies (drug
offenses), violent misdemeanors (sex offenses, nonaggravated assault),
property misdemeanors (larceny/theft, stolen property offenses,
damaging property offenses), drug misdemeanors (drug offenses), and
public disorder misdemeanors (public disorder offenses, trespassing
offenses). Other variables measured physical and sexual abuse,
emotional and psychological functioning, and prior drug use.
Demographic variables on sex, race, age, and education are also
contained in the data. The individual is the unit of analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09686.v1
aggravated assaulticpsrdrug law offensesicpsrdrug testingicpsrfelony offensesicpsrjuvenile justiceicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrsex offensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsryouths at riskicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDembo, RichardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9686Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09686.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09477MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09477MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Use Forecasting in 24 Cities in the United States, 1987-1997
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice
1998-07-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9477NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program measures levels of
and trends in drug use among persons arrested and booked in the United
States. The data address the following topics: (1) types of drugs used
by arrestees (based on self-reports and urinalysis), (2) self-reported
dependency on drugs, (3) self-reported need for alcohol/drug
treatment, (4) the relationship between drug use and certain types of
offenses, and (5) the relationship between self-reported indicators of
drug use and indicators of drug use based on urinalysis. Participation
in the project is voluntary, and all information collected from the
arrestees is anonymous and confidential. The data include the
arrestee's age, race, gender, educational attainment, marital status,
and the charge at the time of booking. The recently modified DUF
interview instrument (used for part of the 1995 data and all of the
1996 and 1997 data) also collected information about the arrestee's
use of 15 drugs, including recent and past use (e.g., 3-day and 30-day
drug use) of each of these drugs, age at first use, and whether the
arrestee had ever been dependent on drugs. In the original DUF
interview instrument (used for the 1987 to 1994 data and part of the
1995 data), the information collected was the same as above except
that the use of 22 drugs was queried, and the age at which the
arrestee first became dependent on the drug was included. Arrestees
also were questioned in the original instrument about their history of
intravenous drug use, whether the consideration of AIDS influenced
whether they shared needles, history of drug and alcohol treatment,
their past and current drug treatment needs, and how many persons they
had sex with during the past 12 months. Finally, arrestees were asked
to provide a urine specimen, which was screened for the presence of
ten drugs, including marijuana, opiates, cocaine, PCP, methadone,
benzodiazepines (Valium), methaqualone, propoxyphene (Darvon),
barbiturates, and amphetamines (positive test results for amphetamines
were confirmed by gas chromatography). The Gun Addendum Data (Parts
27, 35, and 37) contain variables on topics such as arrestees'
encounters with guns, whether they agreed or disagreed with statements
about guns, gun possession, how they obtained handgun(s), whether they
were armed with a gun at their arrest or during crimes, and if they
had ever used a gun against another person. The Heroin Addendum Data,
1995 (Part 29) contains information that was formerly covered in the
main annual file in 1992-1994, but in 1995 was revised and prepared as
a separate dataset.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2
drug related crimesicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrgun useicpsrhandgunsicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrdrug offendersicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9477Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09477.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06567MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06567MiAaIMiAaI
Estimating the Elasticities of Demand for Cocaine and Heroin with Data from 21 Cities from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program, 1987-1991
[electronic resource]
Jonathan P. Caulkins
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6567NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The objective of this research was to estimate the
elasticity of the demand for cocaine and heroin with respect to the
price. Price elasticity is the percentage of change in the dependent
quantity corresponding to a one-percent change in price. The project
involved the development of an econometric model to determine price
elasticity, given that national- and city-level data on the
consumption of cocaine and heroin are insufficient or nonexistent. The
researchers circumvented this lack of data by partitioning the desired
elasticity into the product of two elasticities, involving a
measurable intermediate quantity whose relationship to the quantity of
consumption could be modeled and estimated by measurable
techniques. The intermediate quantity used for this project was the
fraction of arrestees testing positive for cocaine or heroin as
measured by the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) System. From the Drug
Enforcement Administration's (DEA's) System to Retrieve Information
from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) data, expected purity was computed by
regressing on log quantity and dummy variables for location and
quarter. Price series were produced by finding the median standardized
price per expected pure gram for each location and quarter. Variables
for Part 1, National Data, include year, quarter, standardized prices
for a gram of cocaine and a gram of heroin, and expected purity of
cocaine and heroin. The Cities Data, Part 2, cover city, year,
quarter, number of observations used to compute the median price of
cocaine and heroin, standardized prices, and expected purity.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06567.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrcocaineicpsrconsumptionicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug useicpsrgun useicpsrhandgunsicpsrheroinicpsrprice fluctuationsicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramCaulkins, Jonathan P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6567Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06567.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09947MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09947MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of Adult Urine Testing/Drug Use Surveillance Project in Washington, DC, 1984-1986
[electronic resource]
Mary Toborg
,
Anthony Yezer
,
John Bellassai
1993-05-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9947NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data were gathered to assess whether drug users are
greater risks than nonusers for rearrest or failure to appear for
scheduled court appearances while on pretrial release. The data also
evaluate the relative effectiveness of periodic surveillance through
urinalysis, traditional narcotic treatment, or neither in reducing
rearrest and failure to appear during the pretrial period. The
collection provides information on arrestees who both tested positive
for drugs and were released on recognizance as well as those arrestees
who tested negative but were not released on recognizance. Drugs
tested for include heroin, cocaine, PCP, methadone, and
amphetamines. Arrestees who were released were randomly assigned to
one of three groups: weekly urine testing, referral to drug treatment,
or a control condition. The data offer information on the offender's
background, family and employment status, probation and parole status,
pending charges, and prior convictions. Other variables include date
of arrest, charge, initial release, decision, date of disposition,
type of final disposition, number of subsequent arrests before trial,
and number of bench warrants issued. Results of urine tests at arrest
are available for about 65 percent of the total sample. For those in
the experimental surveillance group, summary urine test results from
the periodic testing program are available. There is no measure of
treatment for the drug treatment or control groups.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09947.v1
drug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrpretrial proceduresicpsrrecidivismicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemToborg, MaryYezer, AnthonyBellassai, JohnInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9947Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09947.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25741MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25741MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance's Indian Alcohol and Substance Abuse Demonstration Programs, 2002-2006
[electronic resource]
Jennie R. Joe
2015-01-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25741NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Lummi Nation's Community Mobilization Against Drugs (CMAD) Initiative successfully achieved its four stated goals, which were to reduce illicit drug trafficking, reduce rates of substance use disorder and addiction, prevent drug abuse and underage drinking among youth, and mobilize the community in all aspects of prevention, intervention, and suppression of alcohol and drug use, drug abuse, and drug trafficking. The study also aimed to evaluate whether the outcomes of the demonstration project had application for other tribal communities confronting similar public safety issues related to substance abuse. Qualitative information from focus group interviews was collected. Six focus groups were held with individuals representing the following populations: service providers, policy makers, adult clients and family members, youth, traditional tribal healers, and community members. In addition to the focus groups, the evaluation team conducted an interview session with two traditional providers who preferred this format. All focus groups were conducted on-site at Lummi by two trained moderators from the evaluation team. There were six different sets of questions, one for each group. Each set included 9 to 10 open-ended questions, which addressed knowledge and impact of the Community Mobilized Against Drugs (CMAD) Initiative; issues or problems with the Initiative; how the community viewed its actions; the importance and inclusion of a cultural perspective (traditional healers and others) in implementing various aspects of the CMAD Initiative; and how the Initiative had affected work and networking capabilities, policy making decisions, and/or treatment. Participants were also asked to think about what they would like CMAD to address and about their perceptions and definitions of some of the service barriers they may be experiencing (clients, community, and/or youth). All of the focus groups were openly audio taped with full knowledge and agreement of the participants.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25741.v1
indigenous peoplesicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrime controlicpsrcrime preventionicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug educationicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug treatmenticpsralcohol abuseicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNACJD II. Community StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemJoe, Jennie R.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25741Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25741.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20348MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20348MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of Drug Treatment Programs at the State Correctional Institution in Chester, Pennsylvania, 2003-2004
[electronic resource]
Wayne N. Welsh
2007-12-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20348NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this project was to evaluate the alcohol and
other drug (AOD) treatment programs at a specialized treatment prison,
the State Correctional Institution (SCI) at Chester, Pennsylvania. The
Chester prison is a 1,215-bed medium security prison for male inmates
with a documented history of substance abuse. Programs included an
intensive, 12-month therapeutic community (TC) drug treatment for
high-need inmates and a 12-month outpatient (OP) program for inmates
requiring less intensive treatment. Inmates who met eligibility
criteria for the Chester facility were randomly assigned to the TC (n
= 347) or OP (n = 384) program. The researchers utilized individual
measures and outcome measures in this study.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20348.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrinmatesicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemWelsh, Wayne N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20348Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20348.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04339MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04339MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Juvenile Breaking the Cycle Program in Lane County, Oregon, 2000-2002
[electronic resource]
Pamela K. Lattimore
,
Christopher P. Krebs
,
Alexander J. Cowell
,
Phillip Graham
2006-09-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4339NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was conducted between April 15, 2000 and
November 15, 2002 to evaluate the effects of the Juvenile Break the
Cycle program (JBTC) in Lane County, Oregon on the interim and
longer-term outcomes for juvenile offenders who were deemed high risk
and had a history of alcohol and/or other drug use. The study was
conducted using three waves of interviews as well as administrative
data. The baseline interview was given to and administrative data were
collected on 306 juveniles. The 6-month follow-up interview was
completed by 208 juveniles and the 12-month follow-up interview was
completed by 183 juveniles. Variables included in the study are
history of alcohol and/or other drug use, diagnosis of mental health
problems, history of previous contact with the juvenile justice
system, substance abuse risk score, total risk score, and history of
substance abuse treatment or mental health counseling. Variables
related to JBTC include program assignment, the number of drug test
administered between interviews, and the number of positive drug
tests.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04339.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrevaluationicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenile justiceicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrrecidivismicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsryouths at riskicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeLattimore, Pamela K.Krebs, Christopher P.Cowell, Alexander J.Graham, PhillipInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4339Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04339.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03540MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03540MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of Prison-Based Drug Treatment in Pennsylvania, 2000-2001
[electronic resource]
Wayne N. Welsh
2003-06-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3540NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to examine multiple treatment
process measures and post-release outcomes for inmates who
participated in Therapeutic Community (TC) drug treatment programs or
comparison groups provided by the Pennsylvania Department of
Corrections at five state prisons. The project attempted to examine
more closely the relationships among inmate characteristics, treatment
process, and treatment outcomes than previous studies in order to
explore critical issues in prison-based drug treatment programming and
policies. Researchers examined in-treatment measures and multiple
post-release outcomes for inmates who participated in TC drug
treatment programs or comparison groups at five state prisons:
Graterford, Houtzdale, Cresson, Waymart, and Huntingdon. Matched
comparison groups were made up of TC-eligible inmates who participated
in less intensive forms of treatment (e.g., short-term drug education
and outpatient treatment groups) due to a shortage of intensive
treatment slots at the five institutions. Included in the treatment
sample were all current TC residents as of January 1, 2000. New
subjects were added to the study as they were admitted to treatment
programs. Between January 1 and November 30, 2000, data on all inmates
admitted to or discharged from alcohol or drug treatment programs were
collected on a monthly basis. Monthly tracking was continued
throughout the study to determine treatment outcomes (e.g., successful
vs. unsuccessful). TC clients were asked to complete additional
self-report measures that tapped psychological constructs and inmate
perceptions of the treatment experience, and TC counselors were asked
to complete periodic reassessments of each inmate's participation in
treatment. Self-reports of treatment process and psychological
functioning were gathered within 30 days after admission, again after
six months, again at the end of 12 months, and again at discharge if
the inmate remained in TC longer than 12 months. Counselor ratings of
inmate participation in treatment were similarly gathered one month,
six months, and 12 months following admission to treatment. After
release, both treatment and comparison groups were tracked over time
to monitor rearrest, reincarceration, drug use, and employment.
Measures can be broken down into the following four categories and
their sources: (1) Inmate Background Factors were collected from the
Pennsylvania Additive Classification System (PACT), the Pennsylvania
Department of Corrections Screening Instrument (PACSI), and the TCU
(Texas Christian University) Drug Screen. (2) Institutional
Indicators: Impacts Internal to the Prison Environment were collected
from the Department of Corrections Misconduct Database, research and
program records, and TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment
(REST) forms. (3) Intermediate or "Proximal" Outcomes: Reductions in
Risk for Drug Use and Criminal Behavior were collected from research
and program records, TCU Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) forms, and
TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST) forms. (4)
Post-Release Indicators: Inmate Behavior Upon Release from Prison were
collected from the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole,
Pennsylvania state police records provided by the Pennsylvania
Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD), and the Department of
Corrections inmate records system.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03540.v1
treatment programsicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrinmate programsicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemWelsh, Wayne N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3540Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03540.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02888MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02888MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility, 1997-1998
[electronic resource]
Paul Guerin
,
Robert Hyde
,
Mitzi Wyatt
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR2888NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal for this study was to conduct a process evaluation
of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program, called
the Genesis program, at the Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility
(SNMCD) by examining the program's structure and assessing its
intermediate impact upon participating inmates. The study focuses on
answering three research questions: (1) Who were the program
participants? (2) What were the characteristics of the program? (3)
Was the program reaching the most appropriate offenders, or were its
participants primarily offenders who were not likely to become
recidivists? The study contains information on every inmate who
entered the Genesis program from July 31, 1997, to July 31, 1998. For
evaluation purposes, the researchers designed their own data
collection form which they used to collect relevant information from
each participant's treatment program file. Each participant's file was
maintained by Genesis program staff and was kept for the duration each
inmate was in the program. From each program participant at intake,
using the data collection instrument, the researchers collected
demographic information, substance abuse history, and criminal
history. The data are provided in two parts. Both parts are from the
same data collection instrument. Part 1 covers Questions 1 through 15
of the data collection instrument, while Part 2 covers Questions 16
through 34 of the data collection instrument. Part 1 includes
demographic variables about the inmate such as birth date, age,
ethnicity, citizenship, years of education, prior employment status,
longest employment, and average weekly income. It also includes
incarceration information such as confinement date, length of current
sentence, RSAT admission date, and expected parole date, and criminal
history information such as age at first adult arrest, number of
juvenile arrests, number of adult arrests, date of first adult arrest,
date of last adult arrest, and number of years served in prison.
There are also variables to address the inmate's drug use history as a
juvenile and as an adult. Part 2 continues with the drug use history
of the inmate as an adult with information about drugs used by IV
injection, number of alcohol withdrawals, number of drug overdoses,
number of detoxes, inpatient treatment received, outpatient treatment
received, average amount of money spent on drugs, percentage of income
spent on drugs, number of family members who use alcohol or drugs, and
how they were related to the inmate. In addition, the file contains
demographic information, such as current marital status and number of
children, and the inmate's psychological history including depression,
anxiety, anger, trouble understanding, concentrating, or remembering,
attempted suicide, prescribed medication, and hospitalization.
Criminal career variables include length of criminal career, all past
charges, weapons used during any crime, number of times a weapon was
used, and total number of convictions.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02888.v1
recidivismicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment outcomesicpsraddictionicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug useicpsrinmate programsicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrprocess evaluationicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemGuerin, PaulHyde, RobertWyatt, MitziInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2888Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02888.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04080MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04080MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Tribal Strategies Against Violence (TSAV) Initiative in Four Tribal Sites in the United States, 1995-1999
[electronic resource]
V. Richard Nichols
,
Ted Holappa
,
Anne Litchfield
2005-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4080NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study evaluated the Tribal Strategies Against Violence
(TSAV) Initiative. The TSAV was a federal-tribal partnership, lasting
from 1995 to 1999, designed to develop comprehensive strategies in
tribal communities to reduce crime, violence, and substance abuse.
This study involved four of the seven TSAV sites: the Chickasaw Nation
in Oklahoma, Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes in Montana, the
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians in Michigan, and
the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians in North Dakota. A survey
of TSAV stakeholders at the four sites was conducted in the summer and
fall of 1999. The objectives of the survey were to gauge TSAV
stakeholders' perceptions about the following: (1) the serious crime,
violence, and quality of life issues in each community and the extent
to which the local TSAV initiative had addressed those issues, (2) the
intent and ultimate outcomes of the TSAV program, (3) obstacles to
successful implementation of TSAV activities, and (4) decision-making
processes used in planning and implementing TSAV locally. Offense data
were also gathered at the Fort Peck site for 1995 to 1998 and at the
Grand Traverse Band site for 1997 to 1999.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04080.v1
violenceicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcrime reductionicpsrevaluationicpsrNative Americansicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsRCMD IX.F. Native AmericanRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNichols, V. RichardHolappa, TedLitchfield, AnneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4080Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04080.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21187MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21187MiAaIMiAaI
Exploring the Drugs-Crime Connection Within the Electronic Dance Music and Hip Hop Nightclub Scenes in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2005-2006
[electronic resource]
Tammy Anderson
,
Philip R. Kavanaugh
,
Ronet Bachman
,
Lana D. Harrison
2013-01-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR21187NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
To explore the relationship between alcohol, drugs, and crime in the electronic dance music and hip hop nightclub scenes of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, researchers utilized a multi-faceted ethnographic approach featuring in-depth interviews with 51 respondents (Dataset 1, Initial Interview Qualitative Data) and two Web-based follow-up surveys with respondents (Dataset 2, Follow-Up Surveys Quantitative Data). Recruitment of respondents began in April of 2005 and was conducted in two ways. Slightly more than half of the respondents (n = 30) were recruited with the help of staff from two small, independent record stores. The remaining 21 respondents were recruited at electronic dance music or hip hop nightclub events. Dataset 1 includes structured and open-ended questions about the respondent's background, living situation and lifestyle, involvement and commitment to the electronic dance music and hip hop scenes, nightclub culture and interaction therein, and experiences with drugs, criminal activity, and victimization. Dataset 2 includes descriptive information on how many club events were attended, which ones, and the activities (including drug use and crime/victimization experiences) taking place therein. Dataset 3 (Demographic Quantitative Data) includes coded demographic information from the Dataset 1 interviews.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21187.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrassaulticpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug useicpsrharassmenticpsrproperty crimesicpsrsexual assaulticpsrsexual harassmenticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvandalismicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemAnderson, TammyKavanaugh, Philip R.Bachman, RonetHarrison, Lana D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21187Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21187.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27521MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27521MiAaIMiAaI
Gender, Mental Illness, and Crime in the United States, 2004
[electronic resource]
Melissa Thompson
2011-02-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR27521NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the study was to examine the gendered effects of depression, drug use, and treatment on crime and the effects of interaction with the criminal justice system on subsequent depression and drug use. The data for the study are from the NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH (NSDUH), 2004 [ICPSR 4373]. In addition to the 2004 NSDUH data, the study utilized new variables that were derived from the original dataset by the principal investigator, namely recoded variables, interaction variables, and computed indices. Information was provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 years and older. Respondents also provided detailed information regarding criminal activity, depression, and other factors. A total of 55,602 respondents participated in the study. The dataset contains a total of 3,011 variables. The first 2,690 variables are drawn from the 2004 NSDUH dataset and the remaining 321 variables were created by the principal investigator. Variables created by the principal investigator are manipulations of the first 2,690 variables. Specifically, these variables include depression indices, drug dependence indicators, interactions with gender and other demographic variables, and dichotomous recoded variables relating to types of drug abuse and criminal behavior.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27521.v1
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrgendericpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental disordersicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeThompson, MelissaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27521Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27521.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20358MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20358MiAaIMiAaI
Integrated Approaches to Manage Multi-Case Families in the Criminal Justice System in Maricopa County, Arizona, and Deschutes and Jackson Counties, Oregon, 1999-2005
[electronic resource]
Nancy Thoennes
2009-07-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR20358NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The project goal was to collect data on approximately 100 Unified Family Court (UFC) cases at each of the three selected jurisdictions -- Maricopa County, Arizona, Deschutes County, Oregon, and Jackson County, Oregon -- that have developed systems to address the special needs of families with multiple court cases. The purpose of the study was to examine research questions related to: (1) dependency case processing and outcomes, (2) delinquency case processing and outcomes, (3) domestic relations/probate case processing and outcomes, and (4) criminal case processing and outcomes. The data used in this study were generated from a review of the court records of 602 families including 406 families served by the UFC as well as comparison groups of 196 non-UFC multi-case families. During the study's planning phase, an instrument was drafted for use in extracting this information. Data collectors were recruited from former UFC staff and current and former non-UFC court staff. All data collectors were trained by the principal investigator in the use of the data collection form. The vast majority of all data extraction required a manual review of paper files. Variables in this dataset are organized into the following categories: background variables, items from dependency/abuse and neglect filings, delinquency filings, domestic relations/probate filings, civil domestic violence/protection order filings, criminal domestic violence filings, criminal child abuse filings, other criminal filings, and variables from a summary across cases.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20358.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfamily courtsicpsrfamily historiesicpsrfamily servicesicpsrfamily violenceicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrrestraining ordersicpsrsexual abuseicpsrsexual behavioricpsrchild abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtruancyicpsrviolent behavioricpsrchild custodyicpsrchild neglecticpsrchild welfareicpsrcourtsicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdomestic relationsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingThoennes, NancyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20358Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20358.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09984MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09984MiAaIMiAaI
Intra- and Intergenerational Aspects of Serious Domestic Violence and Alcohol and Drug Abuse in Buffalo, 1987
[electronic resource]
Howard T. Blane
,
Brenda A. Miller
,
Kenneth E. Leonard
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9984NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data examine the interrelationships among alcohol use,
drug use, criminal violence, and domestic violence in a parolee
population. More specifically, the data explore the contributions of
parental substance abuse and domestic violence in prediction of parolee
violence. The study also investigates the effects of drug and alcohol
use on domestic violence for the parolee, the spouse, and the parents.
The data were drawn from individual interviews conducted with parolees
from the Buffalo, New York, area, half of whom were convicted of
violent crimes and half of whom were convicted of nonviolent crimes.
Interviews were also conducted with the spouses and partners of the
parolees. In addition, data concerning the parolees' criminal histories
were abstracted from arrest and parole records. Part 1, Demographic
File 1, provides information on the demographic characteristics of
offenders, arrests, convictions, and sentencing, institutional
transfers, disciplinary reports, indications of psychiatric diagnosis
or psychological disturbances, alcohol and drug use, criminal activity,
and substance abuse while incarcerated. Part 2, Demographic File 2,
includes the same variables as Part 1 (with the exception of
information about psychiatric diagnoses, psychological disturbances,
and disciplinary reports) for those individuals who declined to be
interviewed and a random sample of those who could not be contacted.
Part 3, the Interview File, contains information about childhood social
histories (including sociodemographics, experience of family violence
as a victim and as a witness, and parental drug and alcohol use),
self-reported criminal histories, adult social histories (including
data concerning violence in current relationships, and drug and alcohol
use history), and information about the parolees' and spouses'
discipline styles. The researchers discarded data on female parolees
for the purposes of their analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09984.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcriminality predictionicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfamily violenceicpsrparental influenceicpsrparoleesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeBlane, Howard T.Miller, Brenda A.Leonard, Kenneth E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9984Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09984.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25441MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25441MiAaIMiAaI
Long-Term Consequences of Delinquency
[electronic resource]Child Maltreatment and Crime in Early Adulthood in New York, 1990-2006
Rebecca Colman
2011-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR25441NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
reports linked to a study participant, including variables relating to the participant's perpetration of child maltreatment, type of alleged maltreatment, investigation outcome, and outcome variables reflecting participants' involvement in various types of maltreatment allegations. Finally, Part 3 of the study contains 147 variables derived from specific adult arrest events associated with the participants, including arrest-specific variables, case outcome variables, and criminal history variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25441.v1
career criminalsicpsrchild abuseicpsrchild neglecticpsrchild welfareicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrfamily relationsicpsrfemale offendersicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenile recidivistsicpsrpostrelease programsicpsrrecidivismicpsrrecidivistsicpsrsocial adjustmenticpsrsocial reintegrationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemColman, RebeccaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25441Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25441.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22381MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22381MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring Drug Markets in Manhattan [New York City], With the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, 1998-2002
[electronic resource]
Andrew Golub
,
Bruce D. Johnson
2009-06-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR22381NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the study was to determine how much Manhattan (New York City) arrestees surveyed by the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program spend on drug expenses. The program obtained both self-report and urinalysis data from a total of 5,210 Manhattan arrestees surveyed by the ADAM program from 1998 to 2002. The principal investigators developed a formula for an episodic estimator of a respondent's drug expense for cash, noncash, and cash-combination transactions. The dataset contains a total of 267 variables relating to Manhattan arrestees' demographics, interview information, criminal history, urinalysis test results, drug use, drug market transactions, and drug expenses.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemGolub, AndrewJohnson, Bruce D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22381Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22381.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02914MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02914MiAaIMiAaI
National Evaluation of Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Programs in the United States, 1995-1999
[electronic resource]
Douglas S. Lipton
,
Frank S. Pearson
,
Harry K. Wexler
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR2914NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for State Prisoners
Formula Grant Program, created by Title III (Subtitle U of the Violent Crime
Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994), was designed by Congress
to implement residential substance abuse programs providing individual and group
treatment for inmates in residential facilities operated by state and local
correctional agencies. Under the Corrections Program Office of the Office of
Justice Programs of the United States Department of Justice, state and local
correctional agencies received funds to develop or enhance existing programs
that: (1) lasted between six and 12 months, (2) provided residential treatment
facilities set apart from the general correctional population, (3) were
directed at the substance abuse problems of the inmate, (4) were intended to
develop the inmate's cognitive, behavioral, social, vocational, and other
skills in order to treat related problems as well as the substance abuse, and (5)
continued to require urinalysis and/or other proven reliable forms of drug
and alcohol testing of individuals assigned to treatment programs during and
after release from residential custody. The National Development and Research
Institutes, Inc. (NDRI) entered into a cooperative agreement with
the National Institute of Justice wherein NDRI would evaluate the extent to which the goals of the RSAT program
were being accomplished and the problems that were encountered by the
participating states. The methods of this national evaluation were: (1)
an initial state survey to ascertain the RSAT programs and program directors
in each of the 50 states plus five territories and the District of Columbia
and to collect basic information on the aggregate impact of the RSAT-funded
programs in each state or territory (Part 1, State Data), (2) a follow-up state survey to
collect more detailed information on the aggregate impact of the RSAT-funded
programs in each state (Part 1, State Data), and (3) an initial program survey to describe
the separate RSAT programs as they came on line and to assess whether a few of
the programs might serve as model programs which could undergo subsequent
intensive evaluation (Part 2, Program Data). The sampling method used was a census of all the existing RSAT-funded
programs and all of the state RSAT officials. Part 1 variables include the
amount of RSAT funds received by the state in fiscal years 1996 to 1998,
amounts from other sources of funding, and amount spent on salaries, training,
drug tests, other supplies, and facilities, as well as number of residents, number of
staff, reasons why funding was delayed, RSAT award date, and RSAT end date.
Part 2 variables include the number of clients in the program, number of beds
available, number of staff by gender, race, age, education, profession, and
years of experience, admission inclusion criteria, reporting procedures, treatment
type and duration, type of drug testing and number of tests, annual budget,
sources of funding, and cost per capita.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02914.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrgrantsicpsrinmate programsicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemLipton, Douglas S.Pearson, Frank S.Wexler, Harry K.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2914Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02914.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06843MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06843MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1979
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6843NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use, as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, nonmedical use of prescription drugs including psychotherapeutics, and polysubstance use. Respondents were also asked about their knowledge of drugs, perceptions of the risks involved, population movement, and sequencing of drug use. Fifty-seven percent of respondents were asked specific questions about their perceptions of the consequences of marijuana and alcohol use. The other 43 percent were asked about heroin use among friends. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, income level, and household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06843.v4
heroinicpsrtobacco useicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6843Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06843.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06845MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06845MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1982
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6845NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use, as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, and personal and family income sources and amounts. Half of the respondents were asked questions regarding substance use by close friends. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income level, veteran status, household composition, and population density. Youth respondents were also asked about time spent on homework and leisure activities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06845.v3
alcoholicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescriptions drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6845Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06845.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06844MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06844MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1985
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human
Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6844NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of
prescription drugs among members of United States households aged 12
and older. Questions include age at first use as well as lifetime,
annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: cannabis,
cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco,
nonmedical use of prescription drugs including psychotherapeutics, and
polysubstance use. Respondents were also asked about health
conditions, substance abuse treatment history, problems resulting from
their use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, their perceptions of the
risks involved, and personal and family income sources and
amounts. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity,
marital status, motor vehicle use, educational level, job status,
income level, veteran status, past and current household composition,
and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06844.v3
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human
Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6844Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06844.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09522MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09522MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1988
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2013-06-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9522NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, anabolic steroids, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use, as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, inhalants, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, insurance coverage, and personal and family income sources and amounts. Demographic data include gender, race, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income level, household composition, and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09522.v4
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9522Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09522.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09833MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09833MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1990
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9833NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, anabolic steroids, and tobacco
among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions
include age at first use, as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month
usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, inhalants, cocaine,
hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of
psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked about problems
resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, their
perceptions of the risks involved, insurance coverage, and personal
and family income sources and amounts. Demographic data include
gender, race, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income level,
household composition, and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09833.v5
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9833Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09833.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06128MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06128MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1991
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR6128NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, anabolic steroids, and tobacco
among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Data are
also provided on treatment for drug use and on illegal activities
related to drug use. Questions include age at first use, as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, inhalants, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco,
and nonmedical use of psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked
about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and
tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, insurance coverage,
and personal and family income sources and amounts. Demographic data
include gender, race, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income
level, household composition, and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06128.v2
cocaineicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6128Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06128.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06887MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06887MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1992
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6887NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, anabolic steroids, and tobacco
among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Data are
also provided on treatment for drug use and on illegal activities
related to drug use. Questions include age at first use, as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, inhalants, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco,
and nonmedical use of psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked
about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and
tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, insurance coverage,
and personal and family income sources and amounts. Demographic data
include gender, race, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income
level, household composition, and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06887.v3
drug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrsteroid useicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6887Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06887.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06852MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06852MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1993
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6852NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, anabolic steroids, and tobacco
among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Data are
also provided on treatment for drug use and on illegal activities
related to drug use. Questions include age at first use, as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, inhalants, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco,
and nonmedical use of psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked
about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and
tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, insurance coverage,
and personal and family income sources and amounts. Demographic data
include gender, race, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income
level, household composition, and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06852.v2
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsroffensesicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrsteroid useicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD I. CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6852Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06852.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06949MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06949MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6949NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United
States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first
use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the
following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens,
heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, anabolic steroids, nonmedical use
of prescription-type psychotherapeutic drugs, and polysubstance
use. Respondents were also asked about substance abuse treatment
history, illegal activities, problems resulting from use of drugs,
perceptions of the risks involved, and personal and family income
sources and amounts. Questions on need for treatment for drug or
alcohol use, criminal record, and needle-sharing were also included.
A split sample design using two questionnaires was employed with the
1994 NHSDA. The 1994-A questionnaire is comparable to NHSDA
questionnaires prior to 1994 and contains all of the core questions
from previous NHSDAs. The 1994-B questionnaire, which includes new
questions on access to care and mental health, incorporates
significant changes from the previous questionnaires and can only be
compared to NHSDA surveys in 1995 and beyond. The changes to the
questionnaire were undertaken in order to facilitate respondent
cooperation, enhance the clarity of questions, improve the accuracy of
responses, and increase the reliability of measurements across survey
years. In addition, a rural supplementary sample was included in 1994
to obtain substance abuse prevalence estimates for rural areas.
Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status,
motor vehicle use, educational level, job status, income level,
veteran status, and past and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06949.v2
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrhealth statusicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsroffensesicpsrprescriptions drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrsteroidsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6949Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06949.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06950MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06950MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1995
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6950NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United
States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first
use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the
following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens,
heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, anabolic steroids, nonmedical use
of prescription drugs including psychotherapeutics, and polysubstance
use. Respondents were also asked about substance abuse treatment
history, illegal activities, problems resulting from use of drugs,
perceptions of the risks involved, personal and family income sources
and amounts, need for treatment for drug or alcohol use, criminal
record, and needle-sharing. Questions on mental health and access to
care, which were introduced in the 1994-B questionnaire (see NATIONAL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1994 [ICPSR 6949]), were retained in
this administration of the survey. Demographic data include gender,
race, age, ethnicity, marital status, motor vehicle use, educational
level, job status, income level, veteran status, and past and current
household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06950.v2
drug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsroffensesicpsrpatientsicpsrprescriptions drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsrtreatmenticpsryouthsicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6950Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06950.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02391MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02391MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1996
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR2391NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United
States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first
use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the
following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens,
heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of
prescription drugs, including psychotherapeutics. Respondents were
also asked about substance abuse treatment history, illegal
activities, problems resulting from the use of drugs, personal and
family income sources and amounts, need for treatment for drug or
alcohol use, criminal record, and needle-sharing. Questions on mental
health and access to care, which were introduced in the 1994-B
questionnaire (see NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1994
[ICPSR 6949]), were retained in this administration of the survey. In
1996, the section on risk/availability of drugs was reintroduced, and
sections on driving behavior and personal behavior were
added. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital
status, educational level, job status, income level, veteran status,
and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02391.v2
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrcocaineicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrheroinicpsrHIVicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2391Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02391.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02755MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02755MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1997
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2755NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United
States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first
use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the
following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens,
heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of
prescription drugs, including psychotherapeutics. Respondents were
also asked about substance abuse treatment history, illegal
activities, problems resulting from the use of drugs, personal and
family income sources and amounts, need for treatment for drug or
alcohol use, criminal record, and needle-sharing. Questions on mental
health and access to care, which were introduced in the 1994-B
questionnaire (see NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1994
[ICPSR 6949]), were retained in this administration of the survey. In
1996, the section on risk/availability of drugs was reintroduced, and
sections on driving behavior and personal behavior were added (see
NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1996 [ICPSR 2391]). The 1997
questionnaire continued the risk/availability section along with new
items about the use of cigars, people present when respondents used
marijuana or cocaine for the first time (if applicable), reasons for
using these two drugs the first time, reasons for using these two
drugs in the past year, reasons for discontinuing use of these two
drugs (for lifetime but not past-year users), and reasons respondents
never used these two drugs. In addition, a new series of questions
asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17 was introduced. These items
covered a variety of topics that may be associated with substance use
and related behaviors, such as exposure to substance abuse prevention
and education programs, gang involvement, relationship with parents,
and substance use by friends. Demographic data include gender, race,
age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, income
level, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02755.v3
demographic characteristicsicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsroffensesicpsrprescriptions drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2755Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02755.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02934MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02934MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1998
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2934NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) series
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked about personal and
family income sources and amounts, substance abuse treatment history,
illegal activities, problems resulting from the use of drugs, need for
treatment for drug or alcohol use, criminal record, and
needle-sharing. Questions on mental health and access to care, which
were introduced in the 1994-B questionnaire (see NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1994 [ICPSR 6949]), were retained in this
administration of the survey. Also retained was the section on
risk/availability of drugs that was reintroduced in 1996, and sections
on driving behavior and personal behavior were added (see NATIONAL
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1996 [ICPSR 2391]). The 1997
questionnaire (NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE, 1997 [ICPSR
2755]) introduced new items that the 1998 NHSDA continued on cigar
smoking, people who were present when respondents used marijuana or
cocaine for the first time (if applicable), reasons for using these
two drugs the first time, reasons for using these two drugs in the
past year, reasons for discontinuing use of these two drugs (for
lifetime but not past-year users), and reasons respondents never used
these two drugs. Both the 1997 and 1998 NHSDAs had a series of
questions that were asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These
items covered a variety of topics that may be associated with
substance use and related behaviors, such as exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, gang involvement,
relationship with parents, and substance use by friends. Demographic
data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, income level, veteran status, and current household
composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02934.v4
alcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2934Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02934.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03239MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03239MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1999
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3239NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) series
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covers substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and includes questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. Respondents are also asked about personal and family income
sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal
activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of
drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous NHSDA
administrations were retained in the 1999 survey, including questions
asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences"
items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment,
illegal activities, gang involvement, drug use by friends, social
support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse
prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also retained were
questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using
drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving behavior and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Demographic data include
gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job
status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03239.v5
drugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescriptions drugsicpsrsmokingicpsrsubstance abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtranquilizersicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsralcohol abuseicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3239Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03239.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03262MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03262MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 2000
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3262NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) series
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covers substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and includes questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. Respondents are also asked about personal and family income
sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal
activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of
drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous NHSDA
administrations were retained in the 2000 survey, including questions
asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences"
items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment,
illegal activities, gang involvement, drug use by friends, social
support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse
prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also retained were
questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using
drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving behavior and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey and retained in the 2000
survey. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital
status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current
household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03262.v5
alcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrdrinking behavioricpsraddictionicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsralcoholicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtranquilizersicpsralcohol abuseicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3262Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03262.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03580MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03580MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 2001
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3580NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) series
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covers substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and includes questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. Respondents are also asked about personal and family income
sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal
activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of
drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous NHSDA
administrations were retained in the 2001 survey, including questions
asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences"
items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment,
illegal activities, gang involvement, drug use by friends, social
support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse
prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Also retained were
questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using
drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving behavior and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey and have been retained
through the 2001 survey. Demographic data include gender, race, age,
ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran
status, and current household composition. In addition, in 2001 questions on purchase of marijuana were added.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03580.v4
addictionicpsralcoholicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtranquilizersicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3580Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03580.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02788MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02788MiAaIMiAaI
National Study of Innovative and Promising Programs for Women Offenders, 1994-1995
[electronic resource]
Merry Morash
,
Timothy Bynum
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2788NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
release centers, why it was possible to use intermediate
sanctions, and how decisions were made to use intermediate
sanctions. Variables dealing with funding and the provision of
services to women include the type of private contractor or government
agency that provided drug treatment, academic services, and vocational
services to women, and the nature of the medical and food services
provided to women. Variables unique to Part 2 pertain to the type of
offender the jail housed, including whether the jurisdiction had a
separate facility for pretrial or sentenced offenders, the total rated
capacity of the jail, the average daily population of pretrial
females, whether the jail was currently housing state inmates, and the
impact on local inmates of being housed with state inmates. Variables
concerning classification and assessment focused on the purpose of the
classification process for female offenders, whether the
classification process was different for male and female offenders,
and a description of the process used. Variables specific to Part 3
deal with characteristics of the participants, such as whether program
participants were involved in a case management system, the
approximate number of women and men participating in the programs,
whether offenders were tried and awaiting sentence or were on
probation, and the number of hours a week that individuals
participated in the program. Program structure variables include
whether the program was culture- or gender-specific, restrictions on
program participants, and who established the
restrictions. Programming strategy variables cover identifying
strategies used for meeting the needs of women offenders with short
sentences, strategies for women with long sentences, and what stood in
the way of greater use of intermediate sanctions. Part 4 contains
variables on the size of the mental health program/unit, including the
number of beds in the mental health unit, the number of beds set aside
for different types of diagnoses, and the number of women served
annually. Diagnosis variables provide information on who was
responsible for screening women for mental health needs, whether women
were re-evaluated at any time other than at intake, and the most
common mental health problems of women in the unit. Variables on
running the program include whether the program/unit worked with
private or public hospitals, the factors that hindered coordination of
services among local or state facilities, the types of services
affected by budget constraints, and the strategies used to prevent
women from harming themselves and others. Staffing variables cover the
number of psychologists, social workers, nurses, and correctional
officers that worked in the mental health unit. Demographic variables
were similar for all four data files. These include the institution
level, the type of respondent interviewed, respondents' gender and
educational background, and the number of years they had been in their
positions, were employed in corrections, and had worked in women's
facilities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02788.v1
treatment programsicpsrchild abuseicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrfemale inmatesicpsrfemale offendersicpsrinmate programsicpsrjob trainingicpsrneeds assessmenticpsrparenting skillsicpsrprerelease programsicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrself esteemicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMorash, MerryBynum, TimothyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2788Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02788.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02833MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02833MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents in the United States, 1995
[electronic resource]
Dean G. Kilpatrick
,
Benjamin E. Saunders
2000-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2833NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of this study was to test specific hypotheses
illustrating the relationships among serious victimization
experiences, the mental health effects of victimization, substance
abuse/use, and delinquent behavior in adolescents. The study assessed
familial and nonfamilial types of violence. It was designed as a
telephone survey of American youth aged 12-17 living in United States
households and residing with a parent or guardian. One parent or
guardian in each household was interviewed briefly to establish
rapport, secure permission to interview the targeted adolescent, and
to ensure the collection of comparative data to examine potential
nonresponse bias from households without adolescent participation.
All interviews with both parents and adolescents were conducted using
Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) technology. From the
surveys of parents and adolescents, the principal investigators
created one data file by attaching the data from the parents to the
records of their respective adolescents. Adolescents were asked
whether violence and drug abuse were problems in their schools and
communities and what types of violence they had personally
witnessed. They were also asked about other stressful events in their
lives, such as the loss of a family member, divorce, unemployment,
moving to a new home or school, serious illness or injury, and natural
disaster. Questions regarding history of sexual assault, physical
assault, and harsh physical discipline elicited a description of the
event and perpetrator, extent of injuries, age at abuse, whether
alcohol or drugs were involved, and who was informed of the
incident. Information was also gathered on the delinquent behavior of
respondents and their friends, including destruction of property,
assault, theft, sexual assault, and gang activity. Other questions
covered history of personal and family substance use and mental health
indicators, such as major depression, post-traumatic stress disorders,
weight changes, sleeping disorders, and problems
concentrating. Demographic information was gathered from the
adolescents on age, race, gender, number of people living in
household, and grade in school. Parents were asked whether they were
concerned about violent crime, affordable child care, drug abuse,
educational quality, gangs, and the safety of their children at
school. In addition, they were questioned about their own
victimization experiences and whether they discussed personal safety
issues with their children. Parents also supplied demographic
information on gender, marital status, number of children, employment
status, education, race, and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02833.v1
adolescentsicpsrchild careicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfamily violenceicpsrlife eventsicpsrmental healthicpsrschool violenceicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvictimizationicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationRCMD I. CrimeDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsKilpatrick, Dean G.Saunders, Benjamin E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2833Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02833.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03903MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03903MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3903NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) measures the
prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The
surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual,
estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs,
alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12
and older. Questions include age at first use as well as lifetime,
annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covers substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and includes questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey includes questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents are
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2002 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, gang involvement,
drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities,
exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and
perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as
school work. Several measures focused on prevention related themes in
this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access
to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of
drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on
the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey
and have been retained through the 2002 survey. Demographic data
include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03903.v5
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtranquilizersicpsrRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3903Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03903.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04138MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04138MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4138NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) measures the
prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The
surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual,
estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs,
alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12
and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime,
annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2003 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, gang involvement,
drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities,
exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and
perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as
school work. Several measures focused on prevention related themes in
this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access
to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of
drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on
the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey
and retained through the 2003 survey. Background information includes
gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job
status, veteran status, and current household composition. A number of additional questions were added in 2003, including questions on prior marijuana and cigarette use, additional questions on drug treatment, adult mental health services, and social environment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04138.v4
drug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtranquilizersicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4138Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04138.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04373MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04373MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2004
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4373NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) measures the
prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The
surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual,
estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs,
alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12
and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime,
annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2004 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey and retained through the
2003 survey. Background information includes gender, race, age,
ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran
status, and current household composition. In addition, in 2004 Adult and Adolescent Mental Health modules were added.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04373.v3
drug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4373Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04373.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04596MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04596MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2005
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4596NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2005 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Background information
includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04596.v4
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4596Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04596.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21240MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21240MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR21240NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2006 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Background information
includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21240.v6
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21240Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21240.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23782MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23782MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2013-06-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR23782NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series
(formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily
measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United
States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as
annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households
aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants,
alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including
pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey
covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for
treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be
applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both
substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were
also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts,
health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record,
problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing.
Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the
2007 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to
17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such
as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends,
social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance
abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes
toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures
focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained
were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of
using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal
behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most
often were introduced with the 1999 survey. Background information
includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational
level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23782.v4
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23782Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23782.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26701MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26701MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR26701NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. Detailed NSDUH 2008 documentation is available from SAMHSA. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2008 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For this 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. A split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v5
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingDSDR III. Health and MortalityNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26701Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29621MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2009 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. In the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v5
incomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrbarbituratesicpsrpregnancyicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalitySAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32722MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32722MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32722NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2010 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v5
drug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDSDR III. Health and MortalitySAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32722Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34481MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34481MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-05-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34481NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2011 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v3
alcohol abuseicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalityNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34481Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34933MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34933MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2015-01-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34933NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2012 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.v2
employmenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)DSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34933Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35509MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35509MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-11-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35509NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2013 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35509.v1
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35509Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35509.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08375MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08375MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource] Wave I, 1976
Delbert Elliott
2008-08-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8375NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset contains parent and youth data for the National
Youth Survey. Youths and one of their parents or legal guardians were
interviewed in early 1977 about events and behavior occurring during
calendar year 1976. Included is information on the demographics and
socioeconomic status of respondents, disruptive events in the home,
neighborhood problems, parental aspirations for youth, labeling,
integration of family and peer contexts, attitudes toward deviance in
adults and juveniles, parental discipline, community involvement, and
drug use.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08375.v2
aspirationsicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrcareer goalsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsrexpectationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrvictimizationicpsryouthsicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8375Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08375.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08424MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08424MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource] Wave II, 1977
Delbert Elliott
2008-08-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8424NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Youth data for the second wave of the National Youth Survey
are contained in this data collection. The first wave was conducted in
1976 (ICPSR 8375). Youths were interviewed in early 1978 about events
and behavior that had occurred in 1977. Data were collected on
demographic and socioeconomic status of respondents, aspirations,
social isolation, normlessness, labeling, attitudes toward deviance,
exposure to delinquent peers, commitment to delinquent peers, sex
roles, interpersonal violence, exposure to substance abuse,
self-reported delinquency, drug and alcohol use, and victimization.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08424.v2
victimizationicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrcareer goalsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsrexpectationsicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsraspirationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial attitudesicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsrsocial valuesicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrSAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyRCMD I. CrimeNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8424Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08424.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08506MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08506MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource] Wave III, 1978
Delbert Elliott
2008-09-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8506NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Youth data for the third wave of the National Youth Survey
are contained in this data collection, which includes data for youth
interviewed in 1979 about events and behavior of the preceding year.
The first wave of this study was conducted in 1976 (ICPSR 8375) and the
second wave in 1977 (ICPSR 8424). Data were collected on the
demographic and socioeconomic status of respondents, disruptive events
in the home, youth aspirations, expectations for future goals, social
isolation, normlessness, labeling, perceived disapproval, attitudes
toward deviance, exposure and commitment to delinquent peers, sex
roles, attitudes toward sexual assault, interpersonal violence,
pressure for substance abuse by peers, exposure to substance abuse by
parents, self-reported delinquency, and drug and alcohol use.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08506.v2
aspirationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial attitudesicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrvictimizationicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrcareer goalsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsrexpectationsicpsrSAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD I. CrimeElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8506Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08506.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08917MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08917MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource] Wave IV, 1979
Delbert Elliott
2008-09-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8917NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Youth data for the fourth wave of the National Youth Survey
are contained in this data collection. The first wave of this survey
was conducted in 1976 (ICPSR 8375), the second wave in 1977 (ICPSR
8424), and the third wave in 1978 (ICPSR 8506). Data are available in
this wave on the demographic and socioeconomic status of respondents,
disruptive events in the home, youth aspirations and expectations,
social isolation, normlessness, perceived disapproval by parents and
peers, attitudes toward deviance, exposure and commitment to delinquent
peers, sex roles, interpersonal violence, pressure for substance abuse
by peers, self-reported delinquency, drug and alcohol use, and
victimization.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08917.v2
aspirationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial attitudesicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsrexpectationsicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrvictimizationicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrcareer goalsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrSAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD I. CrimeElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8917Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08917.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09112MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09112MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource]Wave V, 1980
Delbert Elliott
2008-09-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR9112NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Youth data for the fifth wave of the National Youth Survey
are contained in this collection. The first wave of this survey was
conducted in 1976 (ICPSR 8375), the second wave in 1977 (ICPSR 8424),
the third wave in 1978 (ICPSR 8506), and the fourth wave in 1979 (ICPSR
8917). For this wave, youths in the United States were interviewed in
early 1981 about events and behavior occurring in calendar year 1980.
Data are available on the demographic and socioeconomic status of
respondents, disruptive events in the home, neighborhood problems,
youth aspirations and current successes, normlessness, labeling by
parents, friends, and co-workers, perceived disapproval, attitudes
toward deviance, exposure and commitment to delinquent peers, sex
roles, interpersonal violence, attitudes toward sexual violence,
pressure for substance abuse by peers, drug and alcohol use, and
victimization.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09112.v2
neighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial attitudesicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrvictimizationicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrcareer goalsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsrexpectationsicpsraspirationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrSAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD I. CrimeNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9112Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09112.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09948MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09948MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource]Wave VI, 1983
Delbert Elliott
2008-10-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9948NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Youth data for the sixth wave of the National Youth Survey
are contained in this collection. This research project, which was
designed to gain a better understanding of both conventional and
deviant types of behavior by youths, involved collecting information
from a representative sample of young people in the United States. The
first wave of this survey was conducted in 1976 (ICPSR 8375), the
second wave in 1977 (ICPSR 8424), the third wave in 1978 (ICPSR 8506),
the fourth wave in 1979 (ICPSR 8917), and the fifth wave in 1980 (ICPSR
9112). For this wave, youths and young adults were interviewed in early
1984 about events and behavior occurring in calendar year 1983, when
they were 17 to 26 years of age. Data are available on the demographic
and socioeconomic status of respondents, disruptive events for parents,
neighborhood problems, employment, children, aspirations and current
successes, normlessness, labeling by parents, perceived disapproval by
parents, peers, co-workers, and partner, attitudes toward deviance,
exposure to delinquent peers, self-reported delinquency, drug and
alcohol use, victimization, pregnancy, depression, use of outpatient
services, spouse violence by respondent and partner, and sexual
activity.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09948.v1
aspirationsicpsrexpectationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrbehavior problemsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsryoung adultsicpsrcareer goalsicpsryouthsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrvictimizationicpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD I. CrimeNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencySAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9948Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09948.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06542MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1996 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06542MiAaIMiAaI
National Youth Survey [United States]
[electronic resource] Wave VII, 1987
Delbert Elliott
2009-04-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1996ICPSR6542NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Youth data for the seventh wave of the National Youth
Survey are contained in this collection. This research project,
designed to gain a better understanding of both conventional and
deviant types of behavior by youths, involved collecting information
from a representative sample of young people in the United States. The
first wave of this survey was conducted in 1976 (ICPSR 8375), the
second in 1977 (ICPSR 8424), the third in 1978 (ICPSR 8506), the
fourth in 1979 (ICPSR 8917), the fifth in 1980 (ICPSR 9112), and the
sixth in 1983 (ICPSR 9948). For this wave, young adults were
interviewed in early 1987 about events and behavior occurring in
calendar year 1986, when they were 20 to 29 years of age. Data are
available on the demographic and socioeconomic status of respondents,
parents and friends, neighborhood problems, education, employment,
skills, aspirations, encouragement, normlessness, attitudes toward
deviance, exposure to delinquent peers, self-reported depression,
delinquency, drug and alcohol use, victimization, pregnancy, abortion,
use of mental health and outpatient services, violence by respondent
and acquaintances, use of controlled drugs, and sexual activity.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06542.v3
aspirationsicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrcareer goalsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdevianceicpsrdrugsicpsrexpectationsicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrlife eventsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparentsicpsrpeer influenceicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial isolationicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrspouse abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrvictimizationicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesSAMHDA IV. National Youth SurveyNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyRCMD I. CrimeElliott, DelbertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6542Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06542.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03873MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03873MiAaIMiAaI
Nature and Correlates of Domestic Violence Among Female Arrestees in San Diego, California, 2000-2001
[electronic resource]
Susan Pennell
,
Cynthia Burke
2005-01-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR3873NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study sought to examine the incidence and prevalence
of domestic violence among female arrestees. The data for this
research were collected in conjunction with the National Institute of
Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs. Female
arrestees in San Diego, California, who had completed the ADAM
interview and provided a urine specimen were asked if they would be
willing to answer an additional set of questions concerning their
experience with domestic violence. Respondents were asked a series of
questions about the types of abuse they experienced and a host of
supplemental questions detailing the abusive incidents they
experienced in their lifetime and in the last 12 months.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03873.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrdomestic violenceicpsremotional abuseicpsrfemale offendersicpsrsexual abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrviolence against womenicpsrNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemPennell, SusanBurke, CynthiaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3873Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03873.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08936MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08936MiAaIMiAaI
Nature and Patterns of Homicide in Eight American Cities, 1978
[electronic resource]
Margaret A. Zahn
,
Marc Riedel
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8936NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset contains detailed information on homicides in
eight United States cities: Philadelphia, Newark, Chicago, St. Louis,
Memphis, Dallas, Oakland, and "Ashton" (a representative large
western city). Detailed characteristics for each homicide victim
include time and date of homicide, age, gender, race, place of birth,
marital status, living arrangement, occupation, socioeconomic status
(SES), employment status, method of assault, location where homicide
occurred, relationship of victim to offender, circumstances surrounding
death, precipitation or resistance of victim, physical evidence
collected, victim's drug history, victim's prior criminal record, and
number of offenders identified. Data on up to two offenders and three
witnesses are also available and include the criminal history, justice
system disposition, and age, sex, and race of each offender.
Information on the age, sex, and race of each witness also was
collected, as were data on witness type (police informant, child,
eyewitness, etc.). Finally, information from the medical examiner's
records including results of narcotics and blood alcohol tests of the
victim are provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08936.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdrug useicpsrevidenceicpsrhomicideicpsroffendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvictimsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsZahn, Margaret A.Riedel, MarcInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8936Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08936.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20349MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20349MiAaIMiAaI
Neuropsychological and Emotional Deficits as Predictors of Correctional Treatment Response in Maryland, 2003-2005
[electronic resource]
RTI International
2008-03-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20349NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was designed to elucidate underlying
neuropsychological and emotional regulatory mechanisms in variable
responses to a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program among prison
inmates. This study tested the hypotheses that performance deficits in
executive cognitive function (ECF) tasks and emotional responses will
characterize aggressive and disruptive inmates and predict treatment
response. All subjects were examined using noninvasive behavioral,
psychological, ECF, and hormone tests. The data contain a total of 232
cases. Inmates volunteering to participate in the cognitive-behavioral
therapy (CBT) program offered by the Maryland correctional system were
recruited from three facilities using a pseudo-random selection
procedure during intake into the program. Consenting inmates received
an extensive baseline testing battery of several complementary
dimensions of higher order neuropsychological functions as well as
conditions that influence them: (1) three ECF tasks and one emotional
perception task, (2) collection of salivary cortisol during an acute
stress task and the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) taken beforehand,
(3) a short general neuropsychological test, (4) three psychological
questionnaires, (5) an historical inventory to assess prior drug use
and child and family background, and (6) a treatment readiness,
responsivity, and gain scale. An events inventory and a success
inventory were also administered. Several additional tests were
administered repeatedly throughout treatment. A record review was
conducted after program completion to ascertain incidents of
institutional misconduct as well as treatment performance outcomes.
Variables include IQ, demographics, background information, prior drug
use, early trauma, psychopathy, aggression, stressful events, success,
reactions to provocation, treatment readiness, emotional
perception/regulation, executive cognitive performance, cortisol
measures, treatment gain, treatment responsivity, treatment
completion, Maryland Offender Based State Correctional Information
System (OBSCIS) data, institutional infractions, segregations, and
several other computed variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20349.v1
addictionicpsraggressionicpsrbehavior modificationicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrcognitive processesicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdecision makingicpsremotional statesicpsrevaluationicpsrhuman behavioricpsrinmatesicpsrintervention strategiesicpsrpersonality assessmenticpsrprogram evaluationicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRTI InternationalInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20349Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20349.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25724MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25724MiAaIMiAaI
Outcome Analysis Study of Drug Courts and State Mandated Drug Treatment in Los Angeles and San Joaquin Counties, California, 1998-2007
[electronic resource]
Shannon M. Carey
2009-11-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25724NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The California Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) of 2000 targeted nonviolent offenders who have a history of substance abuse and were primarily charged with misdemeanor or felony possession, excluding selling charges, for diversion from incarceration into community-based substance abuse programs. The two sites selected for this study (the El Monte Drug Court in Los Angeles County and San Joaquin County Drug Court) had SACPA programs that differed from each other and from the Drug Court model. The data for the outcome analysis were collected from administrative databases and from paper files where necessary and available. The data link an individial's criminal activity data, treatment data, and other program activity data. The outcome analysis consisted of Drug Court and Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) samples from San Joaquin and El Monte (Los Angeles) counties. Part 1, San Joaquin County Data, had a total of 725 participants and Part 2, El Monte (Los Angeles) County Data, had a total of 587 participants. The Drug Court cohort included pre- and post-SACPA Drug Court participants. The pre-SACPA Drug Court participants included all those who entered the Drug Court program July 1998 through June 1999 and included 202 participants in San Joaquin and 127 participants in El Monte. The post-SACPA Drug Court participants included all those who entered the Drug Court program in July 2002 through June 2003. This sample provided 128 participants in San Joaquin and 147 participants in El Monte who experienced the Drug Court program after any changes in eligibility and Drug Court processes due to SACPA, as well as allowing for outcome data for three years post-program entry. The SACPA samples in San Joaquin and El Monte consisted of all SACPA participants who were first time enrollees in SACPA programs between July 2002 and June 2003. These samples included 395 participants in San Joaquin and 313 participants in El Monte who experienced a reasonably well-established SACPA program while still allowing three years of outcomes post-program entry. The data for both San Joaquin county and El Monte (Los Angeles) county include the demographic variables age, race, gender, and drug of choice. Drug Court Treatment variables include dates or number of group sessions, dates or number of individual sessions, dates or number of days in residential treatment, other Drug Court service dates and types. Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) Treatment variables include dates or number of group sessions or episodes, dates or number of individual sessions or episodes, dates or number of urinalysis tests, dates or number of days in residential treatment, and other SACPA service dates and types. Other variables include arrest data, new court cases data, jail data, prison data, and probation data.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25724.v1
crime control programsicpsrdiversion programsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsroutcome evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeCarey, Shannon M.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25724Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25724.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03716MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03716MiAaIMiAaI
Outcome Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-2000
[electronic resource]
Kevin, D. Knight
,
Dwayne Simpson
,
Matthew L. Hiller
2003-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3716NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was an outcome evaluation of the Dallas County
Judicial Treatment Center (DCJTC), a six-month residential substance
abuse treatment (RSAT) facility in Dallas County, Texas. The primary
goal of this evaluation was to assess offender recidivism following
treatment in this six-month community-based modified therapeutic
community for probationers. Secondary goals were to examine change in
social functioning over time among probationers mandated to this
program, to determine which characteristics at intake and which
during-treatment social functioning indicators were predictive of
dropping out of treatment early, and to identify which indicators
predicted being arrested one to two years after treatment. These goals
were accomplished by a comparison of outcomes between treated
probationers and an untreated comparison group and by an assessment
of the relationships among treatment, social functioning, and
recidivism. For both treatment and comparison groups, a criminal
records search was performed on the Institutional Division database of
the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for all of the study
participants for the two years following discharge for treatment or
following commitment to probation. In addition to these records,
treatment participants were asked to complete a set of data collection
forms over their course of treatment. These forms collected
information about mental status, background and psychosocial
functioning, substance abuse, psychological status, offenders'
perceptions of the program and their experiences in treatment,
evaluations of counselors, self-evaluations, and counselors'
evaluations of clients.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03716.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrinmate programsicpsrmental healthicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrresidential programsicpsrself evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemKnight, Kevin, D.Simpson, DwayneHiller, Matthew L.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3716Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03716.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25865MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25865MiAaIMiAaI
Outcome Evaluation of the Teens, Crime, and the Community/Community Works (TCC/CW) Training Program in Nine Cities Across Four States, 2004-2005
[electronic resource]
Finn-Aage Esbensen
2011-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR25865NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In 1985, the Teens, Crime, and the Community and Community Works (TCC/CW) program, a collaborative effort by the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC) and Street Law, Inc., was developed in an effort to reduce adolescent victimization. The purpose of the study was to assess whether the TCC/CW program was successfully implemented and whether it achieved its desired outcome, namely to reduce adolescent victimization. Following an extensive effort to identify potential sites for inclusion in the TCC/CW program outcome evaluation, a quasi-experimental five-wave panel study of public school students was initiated in the fall of 2004. Classrooms in the sample were matched by teacher or subject and one-half of the classrooms received the TCC/CW curriculum while the other half (the control group) was not exposed to the curriculum. A total of 1,686 students representing 98 classrooms in 15 middle schools located in 9 cities in 4 different states were surveyed 3 times: pre-tests in Fall 2004 (Part 1), post-tests in Spring 2005 (Part 2), and through a one-year follow-up survey in Fall 2005 (Part 3). A total of 227 variables are included in Part 1, 297 in Part 2, and 290 in Part 3. Most of these variables are the same across waves, including demographic variables, variables measuring whether the students are involved in extracurricular and other school related activities, community service, religious activities, family activities, employment, or illegal activities and crime, variables measuring the students' views regarding bullying, schoolwork, school and neighborhood violence, property crimes, drug use, alcohol use, gun violence, vandalism, skipping school, inter-racial tensions, neighborhood poverty, and law-enforcement officers, variables measuring how students react to anger, risk, conflict with fellow students, and how they handle long-term versus short-term decision-making, variables measuring group dynamics, variables measuring students' self-esteem, and variables measuring students' awareness of resources in their respective school and neighborhood to address problems and provide support.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25865.v1
adolescentsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrbullyingicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime in schoolsicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsreducational environmenticpsrevaluationicpsrfear of crimeicpsrgang membersicpsrgangsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile gangsicpsrjuvenilesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrschool securityicpsrschool violenceicpsrsocial problemsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvictimizationicpsrweaponsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyEsbensen, Finn-AageInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25865Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25865.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03499MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03499MiAaIMiAaI
Pathological Gambling in Arrestee Populations in Des Moines, Iowa, and Las Vegas, Nevada, 2000-2001
[electronic resource]
Richard McCorkle
2003-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3499NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study sought to examine the extent, nature, and
consequences of pathological gambling disorders in arrestee
populations. Five research questions were addressed: (1) What is the
prevalence of pathological gambling in arrestee populations? (2) What
is the profile of the pathological gambler arrested for felony and
misdemeanor offenses? (3) How does the nature and level of criminal
activity among pathological gamblers compare to that of non-
pathological gamblers? (4) What proportion of the crime committed by
offenders with pathological gambling disorders is linked to their
gambling activities (either to fund gambling or pay off gambling
debts)? and (5) How does substance abuse interact with pathological
gambling to affect the nature and extent of criminal activity? The
data for this research were collected in conjunction with the National
Institute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM)
programs. Arrestees in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Des Moines, Iowa, who had
completed the ADAM interview and provided a urine specimen were asked
if they would be willing to answer an additional set of questions
concerning their gambling behavior. Data from the ADAM interview and
drug screening were merged with data collected using the gambling
addendum, producing the dataset for this study. Variables from the
ADAM instruments were comprised of demographic data on each arrestee,
calendar of admissions to drug treatment-related programs, data on
dependence and abuse, drug market and use data, and urine test
results. The gambling addendum was used to collect data on five
topics: (1) past-year gambling activity, (2) the use of alcohol and
illegal drugs prior to and during gambling, (3) substance abuse and/or
self-reported gambling problems, (4) past-year criminal activity
(property, drug, and violent offending), and (5) motivations for
criminal activity (gambling or non-gambling related).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03499.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsraddictionicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrgamblingicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMcCorkle, RichardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3499Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03499.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20626MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20626MiAaIMiAaI
Prevalence and Case Characteristics of Drug-Facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape Among College Students and Other Young Women in the United States, 2006
[electronic resource]
Dean G. Kilpatrick
,
Heidi S. Resnick
,
Kenneth J. Ruggiero
,
Lauren M. Conoscenti
,
Jenna McCauley
2010-02-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR20626NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study had four key goals. The first goal was to identify how many women in the United States and in college settings have ever been raped or sexually assaulted during their lifetime and within the past year. The next goal was to identify key case characteristics of drug-facilitated and forcible rapes. The third goal was to examine factors that affect the willingness of women to report rape to law enforcement or seek help from their support network. The last goal was to make comparisons between the different types of rape. Part 1 (General Population) data consisted of a national telephone household sample of 3,001 United States women, whereas Part 2 (College Population) data consisted of 2,000 college women selected from a reasonably representative national list of women attending four year colleges and universities. Both data parts contain the same 399 variables. Interviews were completed between January 23 and June 26, 2006. Respondents were asked questions regarding risk perception, fear of violence, and accommodation behavior. The women were also asked their opinions and attitudes about reporting rape to the authorities and disclosing rape to family members, peers, or other individuals. This includes questions about barriers to reporting and experiences that women have had being the recipient of a disclosure from a friend, relative, or other individual. The respondents were asked a series of questions about rape, including different types of forcible, drug- or alcohol-facilitated, and incapacitated rape. For women who endorsed one or more rape experiences, a wide range of rape characteristics were assessed including characteristics around the nature of the event, perpetrator-victim relationship, occurrence of injury, involvement of drugs or alcohol, receipt of medical care, and whether the rape was reported to the authorities. The respondents were also asked a series of questions regarding substance use, including prescription and illegal drugs and alcohol. Additionally, a series of questions related to post-traumatic stress disorder and depression were asked. Finally, the women were asked to provide basic demographic information such as age, race, ethnicity, and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20626.v1
drug abuseicpsrmental healthicpsrpost-traumatic stress disordericpsrprescription drugsicpsrrapeicpsrsexual assaulticpsralcohol abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD X. VictimizationKilpatrick, Dean G.Resnick, Heidi S.Ruggiero, Kenneth J.Conoscenti, Lauren M.McCauley, JennaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20626Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20626.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04577MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04577MiAaIMiAaI
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in a Sample of Arrestees in Sacramento, California, 1999
[electronic resource]
Carole Barnes
,
Bruce G. Taylor
2008-06-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4577NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study served as the pilot study for the domestic violence addendum to the National Institute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program. The domestic violence addendum was administered during the third (Part 1) and fourth (Part 2) quarters of 1999 in Sacramento, California, to all arrestees who completed the ADAM interview, provided a urine specimen, and agreed to answer additional questions about domestic violence. The addendum was based on the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (Staus and Gelles, 1986) and sought to examine the issue of being the victim and/or perpetrator of domestic violence, age of onset of domestic violence, and injuries from domestic violence. The data also include demographic variables, arrest and charge variables, and alcohol and drug use variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04577.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrdrug useicpsroffendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeBarnes, CaroleTaylor, Bruce G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4577Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04577.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03001MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03001MiAaIMiAaI
Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the Ozark Correctional Center, Missouri, 1994-1997
[electronic resource]
Donald M. Linhorst
,
Jeffrey E. Nash
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3001NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection consists of a process and outcome
evaluation of the Ozark Correctional Center Drug Treatment Program
(OCCDTP), located in an all-male, 650-bed minimum security prison. For
the process evaluation, the principal investigators evaluated changes
in OCCDTP treatment activities, characteristics of OCCDTP
participants, utilization of aftercare, and participant ratings of the
program and aftercare. For the outcome evaluation the researchers
compared how well program graduates fared after program completion
with respect to relapse and recidivism compared to program dropouts,
as well as to a comparison group of inmates who did not participate in
the OCCDTP. Data were collected from the Missouri Department of
Corrections, the Missouri State Highway Patrol, a psychosocial
assessment of clients entering the OCCDPT program, and three-month and
12-month follow-up surveys. Variables include background and
demographic information, such as race, marital status, religious
preference, and education level, as well as information on mental
health, substance abuse, criminal history, nature of offenses,
recidivism, clients' perceptions of the program, participation in
aftercare, and social and clinical data.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03001.v1
aftercareicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrprocess evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrrehabilitation programsicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment complianceicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeLinhorst, Donald M.Nash, Jeffrey E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3001Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03001.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02765MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02765MiAaIMiAaI
Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Kyle, Texas, 1993-1995
[electronic resource]
Kevin Knight
,
Matthew Hiller
,
D. Dwayne Simpson
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR2765NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
drug use, and arrests within the last six months, whether the
counselor was easy to talk to, helped in motivating or building
confidence, or assisted in making a treatment plan, whether the
respondent felt a sense of family or closeness, if his family got
along, enjoyed being together, got drunk together, used drugs
together, or had arguments or fights, if the respondent had a job in
the last six months to a year and if he enjoyed working, whether he
was on time for his job, whether he had new friends or associated with
old friends, and which specific drugs he had used in the last six
months (e.g., hallucinogens, heroin, methadone, or other
opiates). Part 10 (Treatment Background Data, Comparison Group):
Treatment condition of the comparison group. Part 11 (Educational
Demographic Data, Comparison Group): Whether respondents completed a
GED and their highest grade completed. Parts 12 and 13 (Six-Month
Follow-Up Interview Data, Comparison Group, and One-Year Follow-Up
Interview Data, Comparison Group): How important church was to the
respondent, whether the respondent had any educational or vocational
training, if he had friends that had used drugs, got drunk, dealt
drugs, or had been arrested, if within the last six months to a year
the respondent had been arrested for drug use, drug sales, forgery,
fencing, gambling, burglary, robbery, sexual offense, arson, or
vandalism, whether drugs or alcohol affected the respondent's health,
relations, attitude, attention, or ability to work, whether the
respondent experienced symptoms of withdrawal, the number of drug
treatment programs and AA or CA meetings the respondent attended,
whether the respondent received help from parents, siblings, or other
relatives, if treatment was considered helpful, and risky behavior
engaged in (e.g., sharing needles, using dirty needles, and
unprotected sex). Parts 14 and 16 (Probation Officer Data, Six-Month
Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group, and Probation
Officer Data, One-Year Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison
Group): Date of departure from prison, supervision level, number of
treatment team meetings, whether there was evidence of job hunting,
problems with transportation, child care, or finding work, number of
drug tests in the last six months, times tested positive for
marijuana, cocaine, heroin, opiates, crack, or other drugs, and number
of arrests, charges, convictions, and technicals. Parts 15 and 17
(Hair Specimen Data, Six-Month Follow-Up Interview, Kyle Cohort and
Comparison Group, and Hair Specimen Data, One-Year Follow-Up
Interview, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Hair collection and its
source at the six-month follow-up (Part 15) and one-year follow-up
(Part 17) and whether parolee was positive or negative for cocaine or
opiates. Part 18 (Texas Department of Public Safety Data, Kyle Cohort
and Comparison Group): Dates of first, second, and third offenses, if
parolee was arrested, and first, second, and third offenses from the
National Crime Information Center. Part 19 (Texas Department of
Criminal Justice Data, Kyle Cohort and Comparison Group): Treatment
condition, date of release, race, and a Texas Department of Criminal
Justice Salient Factor Risk Score.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2
addictionicpsralcohol abuseicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug useicpsrinmate programsicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrtreatment programsicpsrprocess evaluationicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramKnight, KevinHiller, MatthewSimpson, D. DwayneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2765Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02765.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02975MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02975MiAaIMiAaI
Process Evaluation of the Michigan Department of Corrections Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program, 1999
[electronic resource]
James Austin
,
Kelly Dedel Johnson
,
Wendy Naro
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR2975NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was a process evaluation of the Michigan
Department of Corrections' (MDOC) residential substance abuse treatment
(RSAT) program at the Cooper Street Correctional Facility in Jackson,
Michigan. The 272-bed program was designed to treat male,
minimum-custody inmates with a history of serious chemical dependency.
The phase of treatment at the Jackson Cooper Street facility lasted six
months, and was followed by a 12-month aftercare component. The main
theory of change behind the program was that education about drugs and
their physical, familial, and social effects, coupled with opportunities
to learn about recovery and identify triggers for substance use, would
help substance-abusing offenders to avoid both substance abuse and
criminal behaviors once released into the community. This study used
multiple data sources. Part 1, Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC)
Data, was acquired from the MDOC's Correctional Management Information
System, which included demographic, criminal history, programming, and
institutional misconduct information for a snapshot of the entire inmate
population. These data provided information on all 44,061 inmates in the
custody of MDOC on July 1, 1999. Part 2, RSAT Applications data,
contains data for the 834 applications received by August 30, 1999.
These data were received from University of Michigan (UM) researchers
studying the long-term impact of the RSAT program on offender substance
abuse and recidivism. The data were collected using a screening form
for each application, and were initially generated and entered into an
electronic format by RSAT program staff. Part 3, Service Tracking Data,
contains RSAT admission and parole data, which were manually collected.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02975.v1
aftercareicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug educationicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrinmate programsicpsrprocess evaluationicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeAustin, JamesDedel Johnson, KellyNaro, WendyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2975Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02975.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03102MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03102MiAaIMiAaI
Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the Illinois Youth Center, St. Charles, 1999-2000
[electronic resource]
Ernest L. Cowles
,
Laura Gransky Dorman
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3102NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
As part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement
Act of 1994, Congress provided funding for the development of
substance abuse treatment programs in state and local correctional
facilities with the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for
State Prisoners Formula Grant Program. To be eligible for this
funding, programs were required to last between six and 12 months, be
provided in residential treatment facilities set apart from the
general correctional population, be directed at the inmate's substance
abuse problems, and be intended to develop the inmate's cognitive,
behavioral, social, vocational, and other skills to address substance
abuse and related problems. The Illinois Youth Center (IYC) in
St. Charles started an RSAT program on September 30, 1999. The primary
emphasis of this process evaluation was to describe why and how the
St. Charles RSAT program was designed, implemented, and operated. To a
lesser degree, attention was also directed toward examining the
effects of program participation on offender pre-release
behavior. This was considered to be a primary indicator of program
impact. This project sought to answer the following research
questions: (1) Did the program fit within the institutional
environment? (2) Was the program operating as a therapeutic community?
(3) Were the appropriate offenders selected for program participation?
and (4) Were any short-term impacts evident within the youth? This
study followed a process evaluation design with a focus on determining
how a product or outcome was produced, rather than on assessing the
product or outcome itself. Information in this data collection was
collected from youth participants and youth files. Subjects consisted
of the 44 youths who began the RSAT program in 1999 (the treatment
group), as well as a matched sample of non-program participants (the
comparison group). The comparison group was used to contrast
institutional behavior of youths not in the treatment program and to
establish a non-treatment cohort for an expected follow-up impact
study. Part 1 contains data from two surveys of program youth only,
and Parts 2-4 contained data on both program youth and the comparison
group. Part 2 data were gathered from a review of the youths' master
files at the correctional facility. Part 3 data were obtained from
behavior action tickets (BATs), which were an institution-wide
semi-formal mechanism to recognize positive and negative youth
behavior. Part 4 data were collected from institutional disciplinary
reports (IDRs). Part 1 surveyed youth about what they hoped to achieve
in the RSAT program, whether they thought the program would help them,
how well they understood the program, how they assessed their own
substance abuse problems, what they liked and disliked about the
program, their opinions about program staff, and their recommendations
for changing the program. Demographic variables in Part 2 include age,
race, and education level. Other variables record reading test scores,
math test scores, IQ scores, location of parents, number of siblings,
drug use and frequency, criminal history, types of prior substance
abuse treatments, family history of drug use, suicidal ideations, and
personality test scores. Part 3 contains monthly counts of positive
and negative behavior action tickets. Part 4 contains information
about the number and types of guilty institutional disciplinary
reports, the severity of the offenses, and the number and types of
punishments received.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03102.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrinmate programsicpsrinterventionicpsrjuvenile inmatesicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeCowles, Ernest L.Dorman, Laura GranskyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3102Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03102.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03153MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03153MiAaIMiAaI
Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the South Idaho Correctional Institution, 1999-2000
[electronic resource]
Mary K. Stohr
,
Craig Hemmens
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3153NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is a process evaluation of a Residential
Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program at the South Idaho
Correctional Institution (SICI), addressing the following research
questions: (1) Did the SICI RSAT program as delivered conform with its
stated goals and objectives? (2) Did the program result in reduced
recidivism, abstinence from drug and alcohol use, and reduced costs of
incarceration? (3) Did the referral process identify the targeted
population? (4) Would the SICI RSAT data, management, staffing, and
design be suitably established within two years to allow for a full
outcome evaluation? (5) Were there communication issues among the
IDOC, Parole Commission, and contract providers that might interfere
with program implementation and delivery? and (6) Were there any
cooperative remedies that had been, or might be developed to address
implementation and delivery difficulties? Researchers conducted field
observations (Part 1, Observational Data) of program delivery by
program leaders using both the Cognitive Change Program Module and the
Minnesota Model-Based Chemical Dependency Treatment Modules in each of
the three phases of the therapeutic community environment. Researchers
administered questionnaires to inmates (Part 2, Inmate Interview Data)
and staff (Part 3, Staff Interview Data) regarding their perceptions
of program operations. Variables for Part 1 include the date and time
of observation, nature of observation, clarity, organization, and
substance of program delivery, the program leader's involvement and
the quality of that involvement with inmates, how prepared the program
leader was, and the general therapeutic atmosphere of the
program. Demographic variables for Part 2 include the race, age,
ethnicity, and level of education of each inmate. Other variables
include use of alcohol and illegal drugs prior to incarceration,
inmates' perceptions of the treatment personnel, their levels of
involvement with the group meetings and cognitive self-change groups,
the atmosphere of therapy, ratings of communication and delivery of
treatment, quality of service, and the strengths and weaknesses of the
RSAT program. Variables for Part 3 include staff's perceptions of the
RSAT program and whether they felt the program content and delivery
were well organized and easy to understand, perceptions of the program
leader's preparation and involvement, perceptions of communication and
consistency issues, the quality of service, and the strengths and
weaknesses of the RSAT program.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03153.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrprocess evaluationicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemStohr, Mary K.Hemmens, CraigInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3153Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03153.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02887MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02887MiAaIMiAaI
Process Evaluation of the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program at the W.J. Maxey Boys Training School in Michigan, 1995-1998
[electronic resource]
William C. Birdsall
,
Maureen Okasinski
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR2887NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study was an evaluation of a Residential Substance
Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program intended to reduce substance abuse and
recidivism among youth placed at the W.J. Maxey Boys Training School
in Michigan. The purposes of the evaluation were to describe the
activities of the RSAT program and the relationship between program
participants and success in the new program. There were five primary
evaluation questions: (1) Were the participants appropriate? (2) Was
the staff trained to deliver the planned services? (3) How did service
delivery vary over time? (4) Did the participants make timely
progress? and (5) What organizational factors changed service delivery
and participant progress? Residents were admitted to the RSAT program
and its comparison group on the basis of three criteria: (1) the
resident was not a sex offender, (2) he had a known substance abuse
history, and (3) he was expected to be released within one year. Youth
in the RSAT program underwent intensive substance abuse
psycho-education and relapse prevention in addition to the treatment
provided in the Maxey Model. Intake data from the Family Independence
Agency Information System (Part 1) were gathered for youths who
entered Maxey between 1995 and 1998. These data were used to determine
if significant differences existed between the RSAT and comparison
groups. Additional data were collected through a client survey (Parts
2 and 3), which included questions that evaluated youth satisfaction
with services and their predictions for success. Variables in Part 1
include program admission date, whether the youth was a sex offender,
substance abuse history, the group and wing to which the youth
belonged, age of first offense, age of admission to Maxey, offense
class, number of arrests, number of previous placements, number of
truancies, legal status, and date of first and second
offense. Demographic variables include race, age, marital status, and
county. Variables in Parts 2 and 3 assess the youth's opinions about
school, food, group sessions, hall staff, family sessions, family
visits, the overall program at Maxey, teachers, police, and
judges. Additional variables include last grade of school completed,
expected educational goal upon leaving Maxey, family substance abuse
history, and prevalence of substance abuse in neighborhood.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02887.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrprocess evaluationicpsrrecidivismicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment outcomesicpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeBirdsall, William C.Okasinski, MaureenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2887Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02887.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03077MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03077MiAaIMiAaI
Process Evaluation of a Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) Program in Dallas County, Texas, 1998-1999
[electronic resource]
Matthew L. Hiller
,
Kevin Knight
,
Sandhya Rao
,
Dwayne Simpson
2003-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3077NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study assessed the Dallas County Judicial Treatment
Center (DCJTC) in Texas. The DCJTC is a residential substance abuse
treatment center for drug-involved felony offenders. It provides a
treatment program of approximately six months in three major phases:
orientation, main treatment, and re-entry. Data were collected from
429 offenders admitted to the DCJTC between January and December
1998. During their first week of treatment, residents completed a
comprehensive intake battery that included (1) the Texas Christian
University (TCU) initial assessment, (2) the TCU self-rating form
(SRF), and (3) the TCU intake interview. The initial assessment gauged
mental status, background and psychosocial functioning, alcohol and
other drug use, and psychological status. The SRF assessed
psychological functioning, social functioning, and motivation for
treatment. The intake interview included detailed questions on the
resident's social background, family and peer relations, health and
psychological status, criminal history, drug use problems, and
behavioral risks for HIV/AIDS. Progress made during treatment was
measured by the TCU Resident Evaluation of Self and Treatment (REST)
and the TCU Counselor Rating of Client (CRC) forms. The REST included
all questions on the SRF, plus questions on offenders' perceptions of
the structure of the program and their experiences while in treatment,
an evaluation of the counselor, an evaluation of their own
personality, and ratings of group and individual treatment sessions.
The CRC forms rated residents on a set of attributes related to
residents' ability to benefit from treatment and indicated the extent
to which counseling activities with each client had focused on certain
activities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1
process evaluationicpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrresidential programsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrAIDSicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrcounselingicpsrfelonsicpsrHIVicpsrinmate classificationicpsrmental healthicpsroffendersicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHiller, Matthew L.Knight, KevinRao, SandhyaSimpson, DwayneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3077Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03077.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02766MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02766MiAaIMiAaI
Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
[electronic resource]Community Survey, 1994-1995
Felton J. Earls
,
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
,
Stephen W. Raudenbush
,
Robert J. Sampson
2007-10-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2766NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
is an interdisciplinary study aimed at deepening society's
understanding of the causes and pathways of juvenile delinquency,
adult crime, substance abuse, and violence. In particular, it is a
study of children's social and psychological development from birth to
young adulthood in urban neighborhoods. This collection contains data
from a cross-sectional survey of Chicago residents in 1994 and is the
first product of an eight-year project. The survey gathered
information from adult residents of Chicago on their perceptions of
the neighborhoods in which they live. The survey questionnaire was a
multidimensional assessment of the structural conditions and
organization of the neighborhoods. Data collection consisted of a
household interview of residents aged 18 and older to assess key
neighborhood dimensions, including the dynamic structure of the local
community, organizational and political structure, cultural values,
informal social control, formal social control, and social
cohesion. Variables include measures of the best and worst aspects of
living in Chicago, how long residents had lived in a particular
neighborhood, characteristics of their neighborhood, including types
of social service agencies available, and if they would consider
moving to a different neighborhood and why. Other community variables
measure the relationships among neighbors, including how many
neighbors a respondent would recognize, how often neighbors
socialized, and how often neighbors participated in other activities
together. Variables that capture neighborhood social order include
respondents' perceptions of neighborhood problems such as litter,
graffiti, drinking, drugs, and excessive use of force by police.
Respondents were also asked about their normative beliefs regarding
violence, money, and various children's behaviors. Victimization
variables cover how often the respondent was the victim of a fight
with a weapon, a violent argument, a gang fight, sexual assault,
robbery, theft, or vandalism. Other variables measure fear of crime
and attitudes toward the police. Demographic variables include age,
gender, education, living arrangement, national origin, and employment
status. In addition, a number of scales created by the study's
scientific directors are included such as social disorder, perceived
neighborhood danger, and neighborhood activism. Part 1 of this study
contains individual responses to survey questions. Part 2 contains
data aggregated to the neighborhood cluster (NC) level (see Study
Design for explanation of NC). Pertinent census data can be found in
CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD CLUSTER CENSUS DATA FOR THE PROJECT ON HUMAN
DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN), 1990 AND 2000 [ICPSR
13757].
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02766.v3
adolescentsicpsrchild developmenticpsrchildrenicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrperceptionsicpsrsocial controlicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrviolenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimePHDCN I. Community SurveysRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsNACJD II. Community StudiesEarls, Felton J.Brooks-Gunn, JeanneRaudenbush, Stephen W.Sampson, Robert J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2766Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02766.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13591MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13591MiAaIMiAaI
Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN)
[electronic resource]Family Mental Health and Legal History, Wave 1, 1994-1997
Felton J. Earls
,
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
,
Stephen W. Raudenbush
,
Robert J. Sampson
2007-09-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR13591NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
(PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,
schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.
One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which
was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over
6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and
their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing
circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,
that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial
behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to
gauge various aspects of human development, including individual
differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such
measure was the Family Mental Health and Legal History assessment,
administered to the primary caregivers of subjects belonging to
Cohorts 0 to 18. It included questions designed to obtain family
members' history of psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and any
involvement with the law.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13591.v2
adolescentsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrassaulticpsrchild developmenticpsrchildhoodicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfamily violenceicpsremotional problemsicpsrhealth behavioricpsrlegal historyicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesCCEERC II.E.8. Physical and Mental HealthCCEERC II.E. Parent/Family CharacteristicsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderRCMD I. CrimeRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsPHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort StudyDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyEarls, Felton J.Brooks-Gunn, JeanneRaudenbush, Stephen W.Sampson, Robert J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13591Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13591.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13578MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13578MiAaIMiAaI
Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN)
[electronic resource] Systematic Social Observation, 1995
Felton J. Earls
,
Stephen W. Raudenbush
,
Albert J., Jr. Reiss
,
Robert J. Sampson
2005-07-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR13578NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
(PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,
schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.
One component of the PHDCN was the Systematic Social Observation
(SSO). The SSO was a standardized approach for directly observing the
physical, social, and economic characteristics of neighborhoods, one
block at a time. In 1995, the PHDCN initiated a combined person-based
and videotaped approach to collecting systematic observations of
neighborhoods. Eighty of the 343 Neighborhood Clusters were used in
this study. Once the sampling was complete, the block face (the block
segment on one side of the street) became the unit of observation.
Using videotape and observer logs, data were collected in the 80
sampled Chicago neighborhoods. Only a sample of block faces were
selected for coding due to budget expenses. The National Opinion
Research Center (NORC) collected the data for the SSO. Between June
and October of 1995, trained observers from NORC drove a sports
utility vehicle down every block within the 80 sampled neighborhoods.
A videographer videotaped both sides of each block, while two
observers recorded characteristics of each block face on observer
logs. Further coding of the videotapes and observer logs was conducted
by NORC staff.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13578.v1
communitiesicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrgangsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrperceptionsicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial controlicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurban areasicpsrurban crimeicpsrviolenceicpsrRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorPHDCN II. Systematic Social ObservationsRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesEarls, Felton J.Raudenbush, Stephen W.Reiss, Albert J., Jr.Sampson, Robert J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13578Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13578.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13606MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13606MiAaIMiAaI
Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN)
[electronic resource]Young Adult Self Report, Wave 1, 1994-1995
Felton J. Earls
,
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
,
Stephen W. Raudenbush
,
Robert J. Sampson
2006-03-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR13606NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
(PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,
schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.
One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which
was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over
6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and
their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing
circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,
that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial
behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to
gauge various aspects of human development, including individual
differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One of
the measures that composed the Longitudinal Cohort Study was the Young
Adult Self Report (YASR). The YASR protocol, a self-administered
survey, was first developed by Thomas M. Achenbach and has been a
widely used measure for evaluating subjects between the ages of 18 and
30 with respect to their functioning in social relationships, level of
mental, emotional and physical health, substance use and abuse, as
well as tendencies toward anti-social and criminal behavior. The PHDCN
version of the Young Adult Self Report provided a thorough self
assessment of the respondents belonging to Cohort 18 of the
Longitudinal Cohort Study and scored each respondent based on his or
her level of psychological and behavioral functioning.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13606.v1
social behavioricpsrstressicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpersonality assessmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrself concepticpsrself esteemicpsrself evaluationicpsradolescentsicpsranxietyicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrcaregiversicpsrchild developmenticpsrchildhoodicpsrconflicticpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrug abuseicpsremotional statesicpsrinterpersonal conflicticpsrfearicpsrhealth statusicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyRCMD I. CrimeDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsCCEERC XII. Parent, School, and Community School Readiness/Child School Success and PerformanceICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderPHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort StudyEarls, Felton J.Brooks-Gunn, JeanneRaudenbush, Stephen W.Sampson, Robert J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13606Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13606.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR13666MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR13666MiAaIMiAaI
Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN)
[electronic resource] Young Adult Self Report, Wave 2, 1997-2000
Felton J. Earls
,
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
,
Stephen W. Raudenbush
,
Robert J. Sampson
2006-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR13666NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods
(PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families,
schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development.
One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which
was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over
6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and
their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing
circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics,
that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial
behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to
gauge various aspects of human development, including individual
differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One of
the measures that composed the Longitudinal Cohort Study was the Young
Adult Self Report (YASR). The YASR protocol, a self-administered
survey, was first developed by Thomas M. Achenbach. It has been a
widely used measure for evaluating subjects between the ages of 18 and
30 with respect to their functioning in social relationships, level of
mental, emotional and physical health, substance use and abuse, and
their tendencies toward antisocial and criminal behavior. The Wave 2
PHDCN version of the Young Adult Self Report, including an officially
revised version of behavior problem items, offered a thorough
self-assessment of the respondents belonging to Cohort 18 of the
Longitudinal Cohort Study, scoring each respondent based on his or her
level of psychological and behavioral functioning.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13666.v1
adolescentsicpsranxietyicpsrbehavior problemsicpsrcaregiversicpsrchild developmenticpsrchildhoodicpsrconflicticpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrug abuseicpsremotional statesicpsrfearicpsrhealth statusicpsrinterpersonal conflicticpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrpersonalityicpsrpersonality assessmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrself concepticpsrself esteemicpsrself evaluationicpsrsocial behavioricpsrstressicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesCCEERC XII. Parent, School, and Community School Readiness/Child School Success and PerformancePHDCN IV. Longitudinal Cohort StudyICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderRCMD I. CrimeDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsEarls, Felton J.Brooks-Gunn, JeanneRaudenbush, Stephen W.Sampson, Robert J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)13666Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR13666.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34562MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34562MiAaIMiAaI
Recidivism in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 - Standalone Data (Rounds 1 to 13)
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-02-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34562NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The NLSY97 standalone data files are intended to be used by crime researchers for analyses without requiring supplementation from the main NLSY97 data set. The data contain age-based calendar year variables on arrests and incarcerations, self-reported criminal activity, substance use, demographic variables and relevant variables from other domains which are created using the NLSY97 data. The main NLSY97 data are available for public use and can be accessed online at the NLS Investigator Web site and at the NACJD Web site (as ICPSR 3959). Questionnaires, user guides and other documentation are available at the same links. The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) was designed by the United States Department of Labor, comprising the National Longitudinal Survey (NLS) Series. Created to be representative of United States residents in 1997 who were born between the years of 1980 and 1984, the NLSY97 documents the
transition from school to work experienced by today's youths through
data collection from 1997. The majority of the oldest cohort members (age 16 as of December 31, 1996) were still in school during the first survey round and the
youngest respondents (age 12) had not yet entered the labor market.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34562.v1
alcoholicpsrarrestsicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreducational backgroundicpsrhealthicpsrincomeicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtobacco useicpsryoung adultsicpsryouthsicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34562Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34562.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32282MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Calendar Data, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Calendar data files are comprised of 47 total parts spread across 13 distinct topical domains.
Academic Achievement
Antisocial Activity
Community-Based Services
Contact With the Justice System
Court Monitoring
Gainful Activity
Head Injury
Living Situation
Making and Spending Money
Medication
Out of Community Placement
Romance
School
Each topical domain contains multiple reference periods for looking at the topic across the entire data collection period of the study.
Users who request these restricted data should first review the documentation available from NAHDAP (user guide and frequency codebooks) and from the Pathways Website (domain content codebooks). This review will help determine which specific datasets will be needed for your project. The "Research Description" in ICPSR's Data Access Request System (IDARS) must include a specific explanation of why you need each topic domain selected on the "Data Selection" page in IDARS. Most projects should only require one reference period per topic domain being requested. Data requests for all reference periods within a given domain will not be approved without a satisfactory explanation of why all of the reference periods are required for your project. Since the Calendar data collection is very extensive and Restricted Data Use Agreements are only for 2 years, data requests are not expected to need the entire Calendar data collection.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.
The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2
academic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremploymenticpsrfamily lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrinjuriesicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmedicationsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrservice providersicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32881MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32881MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Collateral Measures, 2000-2004
Edward P. Mulvey
2013-01-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR32881NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700) from 2000 through 2010.
This study looks at interviews conducted with the collateral informants who participated in the study. The collateral informants were nominated by the main study participant and represented individuals who "knew the study participant well". At the interview baseline the collateral informant was usually a biological parent. During the three follow-up interviews the majority of collaterals were a friend. Collateral informants could also be a sibling, significant other, or relative. Collaterals were asked questions in regards to the main study participant's life, allowing for comparison between responses provided by two sources. A baseline interview was conducted with the collateral after the baseline interview took place with the main participant. Additional waves of follow-up with collaterals took place at 12, 24, and 36 months. A collateral report is not present for all of the main study participant interviews across waves (see response rate below).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32881.v1
interpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsracademic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgangsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32881Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32881.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34605MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34605MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34605NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data.
Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories:
Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions").
Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition.
Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests").
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2
arrest recordsicpsrfelony offensesicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmisdemeanor offensesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrsex offensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrweapons offensesicpsrHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34605Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34488MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34488MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Release Measures, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34488NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
The Release data portion of the Pathways study contains information from 1,130 interviews ("release interviews") reflecting the youths' perceptions regarding various aspects of the residential experience and institutional environment (e.g., accounts of program operations and services provided, ratings regarding the participant's feelings of his or her safety in the facility). The release interview was conducted within 30 days prior to or after release from a facility and in a separate session apart from the time point interview. This was done to minimize the burden on the research participant and to ensure adequate attention to institutional ratings. The restricted time period within which to conduct the release interview reduced the likelihood that intervening events and experiences would skew the participant's recall of the stay.
Study participants could contribute more than one release interview, depending upon the number of institutional placements he/she had over the seven-year follow-up period. The current release data reflects ratings from 686 unique individuals. It should be recognized that not every institutional stay for every youth produced a release interview. On the basis of the number of reported institutional stays in the sample, it is estimated that a release interview was obtained for approximately 54 percent of the total number of residential stays experienced by study participants. Release interviews were missed if the research interviewer was not aware of the institutional stay (e.g. it occurred between time point interviews) or if the interviewer only became aware of the institutional stay at a point that was too late to schedule a release interview within the required window surrounding the release date.
The 686 individuals reflected in the release data represent 51 percent of the Pathway study participants (n=1,354) and 56 percent of Pathways participants who had a least one institutional stay (n=1,234; 120 Pathways youths had no institutional stays). On average, these 686 youths had 1.6 interviews. The number of interviews per unique person ranges from one to eight.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v2
academic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgangsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmedicationsicpsrreligionicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment facilitiesicpsrtreatment outcomeicpsrvocational educationicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34488Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34488.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29961MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29961MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Subject Measures, 2000-2010
Edward P. Mulvey
2013-01-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR29961NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.
The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
The baseline interview was conducted within 75 days of the youth's adjudication hearing. For youths in the adult system, the baseline interview was conducted within 90 days of either (a) the decertification hearing in Philadelphia, a hearing at which it is determined if the case will remain in adult court or if it will be sent back to juvenile court; or (b) the adult arraignment hearing in Phoenix, the point in the Arizona adult system at which charges have been formally presented.
The aims of the investigation were to identify initial patterns of how serious adolescent offenders stop antisocial activity, to describe the role of social context and developmental changes in promoting these positive changes, and to compare the effects of sanctions and interventions in promoting these changes. The larger goals of the Pathways to Desistance study were to improve decision-making by court and social service personnel and to clarify policy debates about alternatives for serious adolescent offenders. The study relied primarily on self-report information from study participants.
Each wave of data collection covered six domains: (1) background characteristics (e.g., demographics, academic achievement, psychiatric diagnoses, offense history, neurological functioning, psychopathy, personality), (2) indicators of individual functioning (e.g., work and school status and performance, substance abuse, mental disorder, antisocial behavior), (3) psychosocial development and attitudes (e.g., impulse control, susceptibility to peer influence, perceptions of opportunity, perceptions of procedural justice, moral disengagement), (4) family context (e.g., household composition, quality of family relationships), (5) personal relationships (e.g., quality of romantic relationships and friendships, peer delinquency, contacts with caring adults), and (6) community context (e.g., neighborhood conditions, personal capital, and community involvement). Information about the measures used to capture this information can be found on the Pathways to Desistance website.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2
family lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgangsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsracademic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29961Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29961.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34658MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34658MiAaIMiAaI
Second International Self-Reported Delinquency Study, 2005-2007
[electronic resource]
Dirk Enzmann
,
Ineke H. Marshall
,
Martin Killias
,
Josine Junger-Tas
,
Majone Steketee
,
Beata Gruszczynska
2015-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR34658NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD-2) was a large international collaborative study of delinquency and victimization of 12 to 15 year-old students in seventh, eighth, and ninth grade classrooms. The study was a school-based study that drew on random samples from either city level or national level. In general, the cross-national description of the prevalence and incidence of delinquent behavior allowed for the assessment of national crime rates by comparison with the crime rates of other countries. The study was conducted in 31 mostly European countries, the United States, Caribbean and South American countries. The primary research questions explored included:
Is juvenile delinquency normal, ubiquitous, and transitional?
Is there a pattern of similarity in the offending behavior of juveniles across countries or are there any important differences? Descriptive comparisons of crime rates will call for explanations, especially if differences are observed.
What are the national socio-economic or cultural differences, or the characteristics of legal or criminal policies that can explain such differences?
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34658.v2
crime reportingicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrinternational crime statisticsicpsrjuvenile victimsicpsrpolice recordsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvictimizationicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyEnzmann, DirkH. Marshall, InekeKillias, MartinJunger-Tas, JosineSteketee, MajoneGruszczynska, BeataInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34658Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34658.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02749MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02749MiAaIMiAaI
Strategies for Retaining Offenders in Mandatory Drug Treatment Programs in Kings County, New York, 1994-1995
[electronic resource]
Douglas Young
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR2749NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
track of attendance, whether
someone explained the rules of participation in the program and the
consequences if the subject failed the program, whether the rules and
consequences were put in writing, who monitored program participants,
the likelihood of using drugs while in treatment, the likelihood of
leaving the program before completion, whether the subject understood
the legal consequences of failing the program, the type and frequency
of reports and contacts with the criminal justice system, and the
subject's reaction to various penalties for not completing the
program. Part 11 contains data from the Community Oriented Programs
Environment Scale (COPES). Part 12, Treatment Services Review Data,
includes data on the number of times the subject received medical
attention, days in school, days employed, days intoxicated, days in
substance abuse treatment, days tested for drugs, number of contacts
with the criminal justice system, days treated for psychological
problems, and time spent at recreational activities. Additional
variables include the number of individual and group treatment
sessions spent discussing medical problems, education and employment,
substance abuse, legal problems, and psychological and emotional
problems.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02749.v1
treatment complianceicpsrtreatment programsicpsralternatives to institutionalizationicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug treatmenticpsroffendersicpsrparoleesicpsrprobationersicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemYoung, DouglasInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2749Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02749.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25942MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25942MiAaIMiAaI
Substance-Free Transitional Housing and Community Corrections in Washington County, Oregon, 2005-2008
[electronic resource]
Michael Finigan
,
Sonia Worcel
2013-08-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR25942NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study investigated self-sufficiency, community adjustment, substance use, and criminal recidivism outcomes for substance abusing offenders served through the Washington County (Oregon) Community Corrections Department (WCCC) to document the value-added of providing substance-free transitional housing services. The study addressed the value-added of Oxford House and other transitional housing services to the combination of services offenders receive, and documented the relative costs and benefits of substance-free transitional housing services. Individuals were eligible for the study if they entered Oxford Houses, entered some other form of substance-free transitional housing, or could benefit from, but did not enter, any form of substance-free transitional housing. A total of 356 supervisees were eligible for the study; 301 agreed to participate in baseline interviews, and 238 participated in 12-month follow-up interviews. The study included both interview data collection and administrative records data collection. The research team also collected Housing Data (Part 2) from the housing section of the interviews and Treatment Data (Part 3) from a statewide treatment database.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25942.v1
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrdrug useicpsremploymenticpsrhalfway housesicpsrhousingicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrparoleicpsrprobation servicesicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD II. Community StudiesFinigan, MichaelWorcel, SoniaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25942Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25942.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02598MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02598MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 1997
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
,
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Prisons
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2598NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Conducted by the Bureau of the Census, this survey provides
nationally representative data on state prison inmates and sentenced
federal inmates held in federally owned and operated facilities.
Through personal interviews from June-October 1997, inmates in both
state and federal prisons provided information about their current
offense and sentence, criminal history, family background and personal
characteristics, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment programs,
gun possession and use, gang membership, and prison activities,
programs, and services. Prior surveys of state prison inmates, called
SURVEY OF INMATES OF STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, were conducted in
1974, 1979, 1986, and 1991 (see ICPSR 7811, 7856, 8711, and 6086).
Sentenced federal prison inmates were first interviewed in 1991 (see
SURVEY OF INMATES OF FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, 1991 [ICPSR
6037]). The federal data are combined with the state data in this
collection. Part 1, Numeric Data, consists of numerically-coded
responses, while Part 2, Alphanumeric Data, contains free-field
responses to "Specify, Other" questions in ASCII text form.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02598.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrHIVicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroffensesicpsrprison conditionsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of PrisonsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2598Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02598.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04572MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04572MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 2004
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2007-02-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4572NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey provides nationally representative data on inmates
held in state prisons and federally-owned and operated prisons.
Through personal interviews conducted from October 2003 through May
2004, inmates in both state and federal prisons provided information
about their current offense and sentence, criminal history, family
background and personal characteristics, prior drug and alcohol use
and treatment programs, gun possession and use, and prison activities,
programs, and services. Prior surveys of State prison inmates were
conducted in 1974, 1979, 1986, 1991, and 1997. Sentenced federal
prison inmates were interviewed in the 1991 and 1997 surveys.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04572.v1
criminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrHIVicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroffensesicpsrprison conditionsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4572Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04572.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06037MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1994 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06037MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates of Federal Correctional Facilities, 1991
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Prisons
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1994ICPSR6037NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey provides nationally representative data on
persons held in federal prisons. The survey was designed to supply
information on individual characteristics of prison inmates, such as
their current offenses and sentences, criminal histories, prior drug and
alcohol use and treatment, gun possession and use, gang membership, and
family background. Data on characteristics of victims and on prison
activities, programs, and services are provided as well.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06037.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrHIVicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroffensesicpsrprison conditionsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Justice. Bureau of PrisonsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6037Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06037.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07856MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07856MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1979
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7856NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this survey was to obtain information on the
characteristics of persons confined to prison and the circumstances
and conditions of their confinement. The survey focuses on topics and
issues that are of current and continuing concern to the correctional
community and researchers. Information in the survey includes prison
conditions such as staffing, space, and overcrowding, inmate rights and
privileges, and rules and regulations concerning prison operation and
inmate behavior. Additional data are provided on the presence of educational
and vocational programs, drug and alcohol programs, medical treatment, and
health care.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07856.v3
treatment programsicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroffensesicpsrprison conditionsicpsrprison overcrowdingicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7856Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07856.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08711MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08711MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1986
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8711NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information about topics and
issues of concern in research and policy within the field of
corrections. Chief among these are the characteristics of persons
confined to state prisons, their current and past offenses, and the
circumstances or conditions of their confinement. Also included is
extensive information on inmates' drug and alcohol use, program
participation, and the victims of the inmates' most recent offenses.
This information, which is not available on a national basis from any
other source, is intended to assist the criminal justice community and
other researchers in analysis and evaluation of correctional issues.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08711.v2
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroffensesicpsrprison conditionsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8711Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08711.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06068MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06068MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1991
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
1993-10-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR6068NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey provides nationally representative data on
persons held in state prisons and is similar to surveys conducted in
1974 (ICPSR 7811), 1979 (ICPSR 7856), and 1986 (ICPSR 8711). The survey
was designed to provide information on individual characteristics of
prison inmates, their current offenses and sentences, characteristics
of victims, criminal histories, prior drug and alcohol use and
treatment, gun possession and use, gang membership, family background,
and prison activities, programs, and services.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06068.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrHIVicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsroffensesicpsrprison conditionsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6068Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06068.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07811MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07811MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities and Census of State Adult Correctional Facilities, 1974
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7811NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The survey and census were part of a series of data
collection efforts undertaken to assist policymakers in assessing and
remedying deficiencies in the nation's correctional institutions. The
survey was designed to provide information on social and economic
characteristics of inmates, criminal and correctional background, court
experience, and prison routine. The census gathered a wide range of
information on all federal correctional facilities operating in 1974.
The focus of the survey file is on the inmate, while the focus of the
census file is on the facility.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07811.v3
inmatesicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (adults)icpsrcorrectionsicpsrcorrections managementicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate deathsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrjailsicpsroffensesicpsrprison administrationicpsrprison conditionsicpsrprison constructionicpsrprison overcrowdingicpsrprison violenceicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtreatment programsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7811Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07811.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34304MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34304MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Youth in Residential Placement (SYRP) 2003 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Andrea Sedlak
2013-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34304NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Survey of Youth in Residential Placement (SYRP) is the only national survey that gathers data directly from youth in the juvenile justice system. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) designed the survey in 2000 and 2001 to survey offender youth between the ages of 10 and 20. SYRP asks the youth about their backgrounds, offense histories and problems; the facility environment; experiences in the facility; experiences with alcohol and drugs; experiences of victimization in placement; medical needs and services received; and their expectations for the future. SYRP research provides answers to a number of questions about the characteristics and experiences of youth in custody including:
Who are the youth in placement?
What are their offenses?
What are their family backgrounds?
What are their expectations for the future?
How are youth grouped in living units and programs?
What activities are available in each facility?
How accessible are social, emotional, and legal supports?
What is the quality of the youth-staff relationships?
How clear are the facility's rules?
How clear is the facility's commitment to justice and due process?
What methods of control and discipline do staff use?
SYRP's findings are based on anonymous interviews with a nationally representative sample of youth in custody during the spring of 2003 using audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) technology. SYRP is the latest addition to two ongoing data collections that OJJDP designed and implemented in the 1990s. It joins the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and the Juvenile Residential Facility Census to provide updated statistics on youth in custody in the juvenile justice system.
SYRP bulletins, reports, and a simplified online analysis tool are available from the SYRP Project Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34304.v1
juvenile justiceicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenile victimsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrsocial supporticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrcorrectional facilities (juveniles)icpsreducational backgroundicpsremotional problemsicpsrexpectationsicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorSedlak, AndreaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34304Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34304.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03416MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03416MiAaIMiAaI
Treatment of Incarcerated Women with Substance Use Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Providence, Rhode Island, 1999-2001
[electronic resource]
Caron Zlotnick
2005-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3416NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the initial
efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of Seeking Safety (SS)
treatment in a sample of incarcerated women with comorbid substance
use disorder (SUD) and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD). Seeking Safety, a cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy
treatment, is a psychosocial treatment for women with comorbid PTSD
and SUD and, at the time this study was conducted, it was the
treatment with the most efficacy data for this population. SS
treatment appears to be a promising intervention for incarcerated
women with PTSD and SUD because (1) the treatment targets many of the
deficits found in this population that may interfere with their
recovery and place these women at risk for reoffending (such as
impulsiveness, anger dyscontrol, and maladaptive lifestyle
activities), and (2) it teaches skills to manage these problematic
behaviors. This study aimed to conduct an open feasibility trial of
Seeking Safety treatment in a sample of six incarcerated women with
SUD and PTSD and to conduct a randomized controlled pilot study to
evaluate the initial efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of the
proposed treatment as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU), compared
to a TAU control group in a sample of 22 incarcerated women with
comorbid PTSD and SUD. The primary hypothesis was that, compared to
the TAU condition, women in the SS treatment condition would have less
severe drug and alcohol use as well as fewer PTSD symptoms and legal
problems after intervention, and at six weeks and three months after
release. The first six participants recruited for the study received
SS group treatment as an adjunct to the treatment provided by the
Discovery Program, the substance abuse treatment program in the
minimum security arm of the Women's Facility of the Adult Correctional
Institution in Providence, Rhode Island. The remaining participants
were randomly assigned to either the control group (TAU) or to a group
that received SS treatment as an adjunct to TAU. The treatment groups
were conducted by clinicians who worked as substance abuse therapists
in the Discovery Program and a clinical psychologist from Brown
University. All SS therapists received training in delivering SS
therapy from Dr. Lisa Najavits, who developed SS
treatment. Assessments were conducted at pretreatment, post-treatment
during incarceration, and three and six months postrelease for
PTSD-related measures. Measures of severity of substance abuse and
legal problems were taken at pretreatment, as well as at the six- and
12-week postrelease intervals. Measures were taken with a variety of
clinical instruments, including the Addiction Severity Index (ASI),
the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) module on
substance use, the Clinician Administered Post-Traumatic Stress
Disorder Scale-I (CAPS-I), the Trauma History Questionnaire (THQ), the
Helping Alliance Questionnaire-II (HAQ-II), the Client Satisfaction
Questionnaire, and the End-of-Treatment Questionnaire. Basic
demographic data were also collected from administrative
records. Variables include alcohol, drug, and legal composite scores
at pretreatment and post-treatment, number of relapses, whether the
woman returned to prison, whether the woman lied about substance
abuse, use of particular substances one month prior to prison and
during lifetime, PTSD indicators of frequency and intensity, total
client satisfaction scores, patients' ratings of therapists and
treatment, and trauma scales for crime, sexual abuse, and physical
abuse. Demographic variables include age, ethnic background,
education, first time in prison, the nature of the current conviction,
and number of arrests with convictions.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03416.v1
addictionicpsralcohol abuseicpsrangericpsrfemale inmatesicpsrimprisonmenticpsrpost-traumatic stress disordericpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD III. CorrectionsZlotnick, CaronInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3416Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03416.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03714MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03714MiAaIMiAaI
Trends in Substance Abuse and Treatment Needs Among Inmates in the United States, 1996-1997
[electronic resource]
Steven Belenko
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3714NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection consists of the SPSS syntax used to
recode existing variables and create new variables from the SURVEY OF
INMATES OF LOCAL JAILS, 1996 [ICPSR 6858] and the SURVEY OF INMATES IN
STATE AND FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, 1997 [ICPSR 2598]. Using
the data from these two national surveys on jail and prison inmates,
this study sought to expand the analyses of these data in order to
fully explore the relationship between type and intensity of substance
abuse and other health and social problems, analyze access to
treatment and services, and make estimates of the need for different
types of treatment services in correctional systems.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03714.v1
causes of crimeicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug lawsicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrugsicpsrinmate populationsicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsrsocial problemsicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR X.B. Instructional Packages and Computer Programs, Computer ProgramsNACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional PackagesBelenko, StevenInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3714Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03714.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02958MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02958MiAaIMiAaI
Women and Violence in Chicago, Illinois, 1994-1995
[electronic resource]
Susan Lloyd
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2958NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of
domestic violence on women's labor force participation. The hypothesis
was that women who had experienced domestic violence would have lower
rates of labor force participation than women with no history of
domestic violence. The University of Illinois Survey Research
Laboratory conducted door-to-door interviews with women in the
Humboldt Park, Montclare, and Belmont-Cragin community areas of
Chicago. Data collection for Part 1, Humboldt Park Data, ran from
September 16, 1994, through April 9, 1995. Interviews were completed
with 824 adult women residing in the Humboldt Park neighborhood. Data
collection for Part 2, Montclare and Belmont-Cragin Data, ran from
April 10, 1995, through October 15, 1995. Interviews were completed
with 149 adult women residing in the Montclare and Belmont-Cragin
community areas. Demographic information was collected on respondent's
race, marital status, income, and education, employment histories of
the respondent, respondent's husband or boyfriend, and parents, and
citizenship. Other variables include economic and social problems of
the respondent's neighborhood, respondent's relationships with men,
experiences as a victim of physical and sexual abuse by a husband or
boyfriend, if the respondent had physical and mental problems during
the past 12 months, if the respondent smoked or used alcohol or drugs,
the number of days domestic problems prevented the respondent from
working or going to school, whether respondent was emotionally,
physically, or sexually abused as a child or teenager, in what ways
the respondent's past experiences had affected her education and
employment, respondent's current work experience and earnings, and
whether the respondent received any type of public assistance.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02958.v1
battered womenicpsrsocial problemsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrwomenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsreconomic indicatorsicpsrhealth statusicpsrlabor forceicpsrmental healthicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrrelationshipsicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemLloyd, SusanInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2958Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02958.v1