compared the t600.2 to an ole skool reference700.2 and the reference gave nicer and smoother tones.kurp's is kinda something u need to hear for yourself...u of all ppl shud noe dat .they were both tested on 2 8'' 8m400s.at the same volume level as the ss,the rf did not produce the kind of notes as the ss.just my 2 cents.other ppl listen to totally different things oui.

from what I have seen in here,what men does say sound real good,does actually sound like sheittttttttt.referring to what they listen to in shows.

That lanzar opti well power those rcf really well,,,,its very flexible also,,,,you can bridge at 4ohms gettin around 1000rms,or you can run it at 2ohms gettin 750 rms per channel,,,nice powerful amp...

same way they could compare a nissan to a porschenot everything that nissan build would be inferior to a porsche!!by the way the same company that gave you the demon 2400 gave you the a3000db......power acoustic

we all know of rockford's reputation, this is why i went with the t600

LOUD AND CLEAR AUDIO wrote:no lie that rockford amp is nice and clean and small and should last u some years well ---good choice despite the lower power rating -----ure main concern was cleaner amp n size wasnt it?

LOUD AND CLEAR AUDIO wrote:no lie that rockford amp is nice and clean and small and should last u some years well ---good choice despite the lower power rating -----ure main concern was cleaner amp n size wasnt it?

yep and actually i have stuck with rockford all the way

just wondering was thinking about buying one also of the t600..

i realised that although its rated @600rms the birthsheet does be rated more than the rated...