Speaking of megachurchs what ever happened to the proposed investigation of these money making effidices? There was something about claiming non-profit needed to be redefined to stop their leaders from living like kings.

Remember the Bakers, 10 Roll Royces and air conditioned dog houses at ONE mansion? How the hell's that non-profit?

Oh, I just hate this kind of crap. This is a classic piece of one-size-fits-all sanctimony. Whenever something is being done that they don't agree with, they can shed a few crocodile tears, put a tremble in their little voices and mewl about how the money needs to go to feed the needy, clothe the poor etc. You can come across as ever so sensitive and compassionate whenever you talk about money going to the needy, when the real purpose is to undermine the thing you disagree with.

This just backs up my belief that fundamentalists are not interested in actually being moral, but rather appearing moral to others, in order to gain the social benefits that that entails. Case in point, since he is in the news again: Ted Haggard. Presumably he believed that God was watching him "sin" throughout the entire three years of liaising with Mike Jones, but he only became ashamed of it once his congregation found out. Whose opinion does he care about more? God's or his congregation's? I think the answer is clear...

Personally, I don't really like the bus campaign though - I fail to see the point and think it was a waste of money that could have gone to the needy.... oh... shit...