Category Archives: Scientific Dictatorship

The United States has become the twisted evil spawn of the Nazi Reich.

The word “Nazi” is thrown around quite profusely. It has become the default word for political enemies. Many comparisons are made to the National Socialist party, and since it is such an emotionally charged term, it has a great power to disable a political opponents.

Both sides of the political spectrum attempt to utilize the words, but the attacks become distractions, clouding the real issue, disguising the true culprits. Nazism is currently being used to demonize Libertarians, and conservatives.

The 2009 MIAC Report out of Missouri identified Neo Nazi and white supremacist groups together with Constitutionalists and Libertarians–the report neglects the fact that Hitler’s objective was to initiate a “New World Order”, a scientific dictatorship long envisioned by the elites to control the planet–the report completely ignores the obvious contradiction of a group obsessed with a “New World Order” and another group completely opposed to that ideal, these two groups being lumped together is ridiculous to say the least.

Beside the fact that most political terms have lost their efficacy, i.e., ‘right’ and ‘left’ are only relative to certain times and places; the meanings of these words have been watered down, morphed to further multiple agendas. Nazis often get labeled: ‘far right’ or ‘right-wing’ but the term actually means: National Socialist, a leftist ideology.

Few people know of the failed military coup on the United States government to install a Nazi government in the 1940’s. The plot was foiled by the General Smedley Butler, who was recruited by the secret group of elites who wished to finance the coup.

Nazism was actually quite popular in the United States, there was a Nazi party within the states with a fairly large following, and the American eugenics system was an absolute inspiration for Hitler’s ‘final solution’, the extermination of millions of people in concentration camps.

Recent Matter Matters articles have accused conservative pundits of overuse of the term, however it has been pointed out in past posts that these sensational pundits do not go far enough for whatever reason to point out exactly why the current regime, and many former American regimes have exhibited disturbing Nazi characteristics.

It is rarely brought to the public’s attention that corporate interests financed Hitler before and during the second world war, the Bush family, for one being one of the largest financiers, alone with Chase bank.

The top Nazis knew their days were numbered even before the war had ended, and they took steps to financially secure their position through investments in various corporations.

The top Nazi officials had no illusions about the state of affairs–Hitler had literally gone off his rocker, he’d become drunk with power, addicted to speed, completely lost touch with reality.

Proactive steps were taken maintain inconspicuous power through an intricate system of seemingly innocuous businesses, a complex labyrinth of financial records with false leads, endless red herrings, and dead ends were constructed to guarantee the endurance of the Reich.

The CIA’s ‘Project Paperclip’ brought the top Nazi scientists to the United States to help develop weapons for the military. The Pope, who sympathized with Hitler, and the Nazi cause aided other top Nazi scientists, who were spirited away through under ground Vatican channels called ‘rat lines’, taking them ultimately to South America with new identities.

Many top Nazis took over major American corporations like Monsanto, the chemical company famous for its generous dispersement of agent orange onto the Vietnamese people.

The plague of Nazism was never really defeated in the manner expressed in the history books. The evil sickness that provoked the likes of Hitler, Mussonlini, and Stalin still lives on today.

People lack the ability to properly observe the host that the demonic parasite of tyranny occupies because it is very cleverly disguised with hi-tech propaganda with absolutely no historical precedent to make a comparison with. Combine the invasive tech of today with the genocidal fanaticism of the Nazis and it produces a devastating blow to the face of liberty.

Aldous Huxley was already prepared to admit that most of his dystopian predictions had come true a decade or two after the novel Brave New World came out, but he would most certainly be shocked at the current state of affairs.

The people look off into the distant murky environments of the future trying to predict when the tyranny will start, naively waiting for some type of major event that will cause riots and complete anarchy. Those people completely missed the point, the true beauty of a scientific dictatorship. Through the Technocracy the tyranny creeps up so slow that it is barely noticed when it arrives, and is never thought of again once it has successfully attached itself to the host. It is the strange human ability to become used to the most abominable circumstances–the ability to love one’s servitude.

There is a sense of doom in the collective consciousness of Americans; everyone senses it on some level, but it is just a slight nagging sensation causing them to feel anxious without any insight into the origin of the strange creeping sour yellow feeling wafting up toward the face like a hissing gas across the nostrils, hanging over the eyes to give a faint blurred indication of the world, just enough for some to realize that something is amiss;

This doom, the sinking in the gut–politically aware individuals are almost able to articulate it, but somewhere along the way the words dissolve before they hit the tongue, and the a priori magical forming energies of pre-thoughts crumble before the synapses fire enough electric juice to fully materialize the exact idea.

Don’t let this doom that forms into crippling anxiety defeat you. People are waking up to the technocrat’s madness, and this is just a symptom that despite the happy, crisp, clear image projected onto the collective mind, not everything is good.

Attempts made to convey important life or death messages to the zombie-like public in reference to legitimate political concerns are utterances made in vain, falling on deaf ears–might as well be speaking a slurred version of a backwoods dialect of a foreign language most people forgot long ago–There is a long, blank stare, and the messenger appears insane–warnings of the deadly neurotoxin aspartame in chewing gum are met with nervous laughter. The messenger did research, they read studies–they read the writing on the wall, picked up the common sense signs.

Arguments can be a cooperative effort, they can work if both parties have a general understanding of the opposing view, because one’s point is realized completely if the opposite perspective can be comprehended.

The false semblance of arguments presented by the corporate-controlled media are contrived, seemingly opposing sides lead the viewer into discussion with the illusion that there is a mainstream ideal being attacked, but both sides are conspiring to produce the same conclusion unconsciously in the spectator’s mind.

The talking head pressitutes rarely outright state an opinion, but the genius lies in their implications, the ability to lead spectators to the desired ideas, the ”correct” conclusions. The illusory effort of opposing views engaged in debate is vital to the corporatists who must continually sell the idea that the first amendment is still valid. The two ”opposing” sides of the debate are really just cleverly engineering a consensus.

One can’t be mad at the drooling masses, who desperately cling to ignorance like a divine privilege. There is an on-going effort to maintain a strong public ignorance relative to history, and various disciplines of science. The conditioning is very effective too, because shedding light on these ideas results in automated defense mechanisms implanted from an early age(another loving gift of progress), the opposition to the ”official” version of things is labeled: ”paranoid” or ”conspiracy theorist.”

The mere mention of these buzz words–hypnotic triggers, causes unconscious physical and mental reactions–a sense of revulsion, which conjure up an immediate prejudice for the topic being discussed if it is addressed with these terms–they’ll throw in ”truther” or ”birther” for good measure–the new ”liberal” favorite is “hate group” or “domestic terrorist”; No logical debate accompanied with facts is permitted.

The popularity of this one word non-argument trend is a classic example of the Newspeak language referred to in Orwell’s 1984, because theoretically the language would be minimized to such an extent that the public would eventually be unable to form thoughts for themselves, and they’d be reduced to responding emotionally to stimuli.

The technocratic regimes of the future will have a easy task in the realm of propagandizing the masses, they will simply project striking images onto a screen which everyone will have access to–this could be a future feature of the coming external form of the internet that is simply projected on to the collective conscious from satellites in space, made possible by the convenient medical chip installed in the brain.

Somewhere along the way it became chic to be rebellious for rebellion’s sake (the rebellion being against reality) with no real intellectual basis for the attitudes forcefully handed down from conniving oligarchs who package these ideas as liberating and progressive.

These ideas, espoused by elites are not revolutionary–they are the newest models of brutal oppression, but their glimmering façade is tempting, it promises the ultimate freedom, but yields slavery and disease–not just physically, but the mental too–the worst cognitive atrophy in which there is no recovery.

All the elements of the world have to be carefully examined. The economic, political, ecclesiastical, educational, and social atmosphere–all must be subject to the most acute scrutiny, in an effort to determine the magnitude of the dilemma of the human liberties that have effectively been compromised by the emerging technocracy.

The technocracy, is of course the consolidated power of a select few; it is the blatant disregard for the individual, the complete robbery of wealth and liberty, sacrificed to the ‘collective’, which has become a cipher for the actual agenda of controlling every aspect of life in the name of ‘group rights’.

At some time, along the way, the United States constitution was deemed inefficient for guaranteeing freedom for everyone, but what actually was being initiated was a conspiracy for control. Individual rights would not afford the elites the absolute power required to maintain their monopoly.

In recent years the extent of control manifests itself in the militarization of the police, the rapid transformation of monetary concerns toward a digital medium, and of course the minimization of the public’s voice in contrast to the increasing ubiquitous message of the state conveyed through the corporate-controlled media to ensure official versions of stories are presented to a people, who increasingly find it difficult to not only articulate their true desires, but more often than not lack the ability to think for themselves, to question authority–the authority, who by the way has a very bad track record of providing deceitful information.

The various attributes of our existence, these institutions have eroded, and they’ve been inconspicuously replaced, through the generations, with a seductive amoral composite, through its insidious nature, corrupts the spirit.

It has become possible to desecrate human values through a mass distraction of attention orchestrated in order to make the seemingly innocuous transition seem perfectly natural.

The public has become accustomed to the tyrannical oppression, like Aldous Huxley stated, the technocratic elites, in their pursuit of a scientific dictatorship, will be able to create conditions so horrendous, and yet rather than provoking an outright rebellion, the subjects will begin to love their servitude.

Ask yourself if this state of affairs has already been achieved, through operant conditioning, a gradual process where one’s behavior can be drastically changed over time through positive and negative reinforcement, personally reflect whether this hasn’t already happened–the false reality imprinted on the collective consciousness–the deliberate attempt to stifle reference to spirituality and the denial of the inevitable acquisition of the akashic records, that the people have been made to worship their slavery.

The false reality matrix has been carefully crafted over time, and the beauty of the condition’s installation is not in its abrupt change, because such an abrupt change would be impossible, but in the fact that people can become accustomed to any manner of existence–abominable circumstances, through a gradual process.

The end results are quite fascinating when viewed from an external perspective. The subject would rarely notice the drastic changes that befell them over time. Even the analysis of the phenomenon becomes suspect when it is specifically an auto-examination, a brutally honest reflection of the individual self, as opposed to the observation of the conditioning of others to accept certain radical changes.

It is easier to point to an example of the practice being exercised elsewhere than to oneself, perhaps no one would like to admit they could be manipulated so easily, and that could be the biggest reason it is so simple for the current group of technocratic elites to literally strip away all the civil liberties, to impose a brutal police state, and in such a way that it appears the people are receiving more rights; the public, groveling with tear-streaked cheeks thanks them profusely, begging for the glorious elites to further punish, and take even more rights away!

“Madness is rare in individuals – but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule.”

–Friedrich Nietzsche

The state needs an intervention. It has a host of issues, to put it mildly. Perhaps even the people are a little guilty for enabling it by virtue of their continued tolerance of the insanity.

The people need to address the issue of corrupt governments, the technocratic elite, and the nefarious abstract entity known as ‘the state’ with complete honesty. People are demonized, endless ‘progressive’ propaganda conditions the public to accept the idea that they are parasites on this planet, and that they would be nothing without the godlike state. But what if the state were a person? What are the implications of scrutinizing the state in this regard, the same way people are subject to inspection, who go to a psychologist? If anything, the state should have higher standards applied to it since it claims to be the master of everything.

The state is held to an entirely different standard than the individual. When the public is illegally spied on by the voyeuristic NSA, it is for ‘national security’, to protect against the looming ‘terror threat’; when congress is spied on, Dianne Feinstein claims it is unconstitutional, and when world leaders are spied on, it is a violation of their privacy and they create their own internet.

If the state were a person how would it be classified according to its own standards?

The state is engaged in every criminal act possible, (and then some) either the state, as a person is a complete degenerate hedonist or a glorified sin eater of society.

It may be impossible to determine the exact events that transpired during this hypothetical childhood of the state, but one can make a series of educated guesses based on its typical behavior.

If it is permissible to speculate on the conditions of the state’s childhood it would be fair to assume it was an abandoned orphan, raised without nurturing love and compassion. As a result of such neglect, the capacity to feel emotions and the ability to care for others was diminished. The state was probably the kid who got off on frying bugs under a magnifying glass with the concentrated beams from the sun.

The state is a cold, hardened criminal exhibiting sociopathic tendencies; it uses others as a means to its own ends. It completely promotes a disregard for human dignity and liberal values. Freedom is utterly despised, and slavery enthroned with an obscene degree of illumination, promoted relentlessly on every mainstream media platform.

The state is infested with megalomania, ruthlessly jealous of others possessing any unique talents, self-sufficiency and independent abilities; it is blatantly conceded, a psychopathic control freak with Munchhausen syndrome, as it likes to keep everyone sick with geo-engineering, vaccines and GMO.

The state projects itself as an idol to be admired, instilling a strong sense of obedience in everyone from an early age. It stifles dissent, discourages research, and prohibits skeptical inquiry. It displays narcissicist personality disorder, manifested through the cult of personality phenomenon utilized by various dictatorships from Hitler, Stalin, Mao and more recently to Bush or Obama.

It has an unrealistic expectation of unconditional love and attention, with a complete lack of empathy, an insatiable thirst for power, a bizarre obsession with unbridled supremacy, threatening anyone daring to question its authority, with unjustified greatness and inflated sense of glory defined in its many hyped-up ceremonies.

The state is engaged in so many rotten activities that in the interest of time only a few can be covered:

Sadism as it derives pleasure from torture.

Voyeuristic ‘peeping tom’ behavior.

Kleptomania, as it steals constantly from citizens via taxes and robbing third world countries of their wealth through the neo liberal practice of ‘privatization’ to maintain its power monopoly.

And not to mention, it is illegitimate because it seizes power without consent, and enforces policies at the point of a gun.

Here are a few brief examples of the state’s countless acts of violence: homicide, politicide, genocide, and infanticide; the general classification for all the state’s brutal murder is democide.

‘Democide’ is defined by political scientists as: “the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide and mass murder.” In the last century alone governments world-wide have killed over 200 million people.

For forty years from 1932 to 1972, the US Public Health Service held secret experiments famously known as the Tuskegee Experiments, offering black people treatment for syphilis, yet purposefully keeping them sick to observe their physical condition in the third stage of the disease; almost 400 men were deprived of legitimate medical treatment for the disease.

One doctor stated: “If the colored population becomes aware that accepting free hospital care means a post-mortem, every darky will leave Macon County…”

“The United States government did something that was wrong—deeply, profoundly, morally wrong. It was an outrage to our commitment to integrity and equality for all our citizens… clearly racist.” –President Bill Clinton

From 1946 to 1948 the US government injected Guatemalan Soldiers, inmates, and mental patients with syphilis to test the effectiveness of penicillin.

According to Senate investigations in the 1960’s the Special Operations Division of the Fort Dietrich base in Maryland conducted bio-terror experiments on unsuspecting populations in American cities, Washington D.C., Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. Operatives used specially designed suitcases to spray the bucillus subtilis virus into the crowd which causes respiratory infections, blood and food poisoning. Later more tests were conducted with strains of small pox because of its ability to infect people so easily, and spread so quickly. The Senate investigators were quoted as stating:

“CIA association with Fort Dietrich involved the Special Operations Division (SOD) of that facility. This division was responsible for developing special applications for biological warfare agents and toxins. Its principal customer was the U.S. Army. Its concern was with the development of both suitable agents and delivery mechanisms for use in paramilitary situations. Both standard biological warfare agents and biologically derived toxins were investigated by the division.”

In 1985, the Soviet Union came out with a report which claimed the AIDS virus was developed at Fort Dietrich, Maryland by the Pentagon, and the report was backed by an East German report written by Professor Jacob Segal of Humbolt University in East Germany. These assertions were disregarded at the time by the west as propaganda, because after all the United States would never be involved in anything so nefarious, and the conventional mainstream thought continued to succumb to the illusion of the US as a benevolent force in the world.

Larry Grathwohl, an undercover agent who infiltrated the terrorist group ‘The Weather Underground’ in 1969 reported that Bill Ayers, one of Barak Obama’s political mentors, had planned to create ‘re-education camps’ and those who refused to embrace communism would have to be ‘eliminated’. Grathwohl was privy to logistics meetings where plans were made to kill 25 million people who would not convert to collectivism.

Of all the many things the state is guilty of it is a master manipulator. It controls the mainstream media’s narrative, and the history books, which generate a false reality. The state creates the perception that the people live in a democratic government where people can vote for their elected officials and the majority rules. The United States government is supposed to operate like a Constitutional Republic, but there has been a coup by transnational corporate interests, the ‘corporatocracy’. This phenomenon of global governance has been well-documented by scholars and politicians throughout history.

We have to understand how crucial it is that the real nature of governments is widely disseminated, because the rising phenomenon of ‘globalization’ is being sold as a factor of ‘economic progress’ or ‘global community’ which will be a symbol of peace. This global governance paradigm influences the massive corruption because it encourages the state to operate above the law.

John P. Holdren, the US Science Czar suggests creating a world government to manage environmental and eugenics policies in his book ‘Ecoscience’:

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.

The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

He also suggests martial law may be necessary:

“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”

The phenomenon of trans-nationalist elites who influence governments has already been well documented by the professor and historian Carroll Quigley. Here is a brief passage from his famous historical treatise:

“…[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole this system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations . . .”

There will be no election or debate about this slow and subtle process. Academics have been consistently spoken out about a secret elite’s nefarious plot to control the population. In the past prominent scholars, and politicians like Carroll Quigley, John F Kennedy, Barry Goldwater, Dwight D Eisenhower, and contemporaneously Ron Paul have warned of clandestine operations by the military-industrial complex to destroy the liberties of citizens and undermine the sovereign nation state. The Bill of Rights and Constitution will be sold as ‘out-of-date’ and oppressive, it will be claimed they are in serious need of reform.

Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said:

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.”

In a famous letter to a colleague dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote:

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

In history there are numerous allusions to ‘the shadow government’, in one case on February 23, 1954 Senator William Jenner referenced this phenomenon:

“Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded.”

There were many efforts to install a central bank in the United States, the most recent success being the Federal Reserve, but between 1816 and 1836 one of the attempts to create a central bank caused Andrew Jackson to write:

“The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced…are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.”

The state as a person would be a complete monster, a depraved lunatic. When acts of mayhem are conducted on a large scale, for some reason they get excused quicker; war, perpetrated by governments are jus the rich man’s terrorism. As Stalin said: “the death of one is a tragedy, but the death of a million is a statistic”, and Hitler said: “the bigger the lie the easier it is to believe”—this is how the state operates, it hides behind statistics, and massive lies.

Do you want the good news or the bad news first?

Let’s try the bad news: the state, if it were a person would be one cold-blooded psychopathic killer, a true demon to say the least. This may sound melodramatic, it may sound sensational—it’s not, if you’re not mad, then you’re not paying attention—study history.

The good news is that, because of the internet, there is a gigantic shift in consciousness that is causing enlightenment to explode. When Jim Garrison began his life-long crusade to expose the Kennedy assassination, no one had seen the famous Zapruder film, hence the public had no real frame of reference except for the official government version of the events that transpired that fateful day. This day and age, however news is almost instantaneously spread world-wide. People are starting to decipher potentially incriminating patterns that the establishment displays as they follow the same old cliché playbook with psychological operations, and false flag attacks. Images can be captured and dispersed, picked up by various people, elucidating everything for the public with less of a government filter than days of old.
The internet has transferred a vast amount of power to the people. There are powerful elites who want to control this valuable international asset, there are already moves to grant control of the internet to the technocratic elite. The only thing that will guarantee their success in the public’s apathy. The internet, with its unlimited potential to empower humanity is worth fighting for, but the merciless, brutal swine that is the state must be kept in check first.

“Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .”

—-Bertrand Russell,1953

The industries of the agricultural, financial, and pharmaceutical have been hijacked by predatory corporate interests; they have engineered a neo-feudal condition of serfdom by constructing a false consumer reality with an illusion of choice reinforced by the perpetually innovated products that are inevitably disposable , the untenable business model of corporations like Monsanto disrupting the environment with glyphosates, terminator seeds, and creating a host of other public health hazards; the corrupt financial institutions taking advantage of corporate welfare, and utilizing false financial instruments like derivatives, concocted by foreign oligarchs to rob the public of wealth, a relentless direct-to-consumer pharma ads exhorting the public to subscribe to an epidemic of illness, and new behavioral diseases around every corner maintaining a subdued population apathetic to issues of consequence.

Parents are losing power of their children by refusing to accept suggestions from school psychiatrists about prescribing their children medication. The endless barrage of new medications to support big pharma’s false projection of an epidemic of illnesses affecting the nation are accompanied by seemingly benign commercials filled with characters whose lives were hell until they succumbed to the miracles of the new wonder drug currently advertised. In these direct-to-consumer ads: a pleasant scene is painted, illustrating the many benefits, and all while a low, soothing voice(barely heard over the upbeat melody) warns of the potential side effects that usually create a worse condition than the illness being treated, and of course, the ever-present possibility for hallucinations or death.

Beyond the drugs being presented as viable ways to tone down the blunt smack of reality there are a host of deadly chemicals the public is subject to, such as: GMO’s, BPA, Fluoride, Bromine, and Aspartame have been put in public drinking water and several different food products.

Fluoride was used by the Nazis to subdue the masses and reduce resistance; many countries like Israel, and the United Kingdom are removing Fluoride from their public water supply, citing health hazards. Fluoride has been found to cause cancer, and sterility.

Aspartame is a neurotoxin that activates when heated up above 80 degrees; studies have shown it actually increases appetite, although it is found in many ‘diet’ sodas, and it has also been found to cause cancer.

BVO or Brominated vegetable oil has been banned in Europe and Japan for causing neurological, reproductive and behavioral problems. Bromine also causes disruptions in thyroid hormones, because it competes for the same receptors in the thyroid gland that capture iodine, and the majority of Americans today are deficient in iodine. BVO’s are in most US soft drinks, and other countries have developed alternatives, but the FDA continues to insist it is harmless. Bromine has also been added to commercial bread as an alternative to iodine, because of the supposed ‘elasticity in the dough’, and to promote ‘structural integrity’ and ease in baking.

Bisphenol A, an endocrine disruptor found in the lining the various plastic containers, bottles and cans is an estrogen mimicker, which can reduce testosterone, reduce sperm count, cause cancer, diabetes, liver problems, and heart disease. According to the CDC, children have a higher exposure to bisphenol A than adolescents, and adolescents had higher concentrations than adults. The National Toxicology Program of the US Department of Health and Human services determined that there is a justification for concern to the exposure of this harmful chemical to children, because it will negatively affect hormone levels, and brain development. There is also evidence that pregnant women exposed to products with BPA can harm the fetus, leading to birth defects and in some cases, producing hermaphrodites.

Vaccines have been shown to provide many adverse side effects and serious long term permanent injuries. The CDC admits on their website there could be many negative reactions: swelling, itching, bruising, headache, fever, nausea, seizures, and death. Recent campaigns, like the ‘green our vaccines’ movement have attempted to create a dialogue and public awareness of neurological conditions such as autism that has afflicted an ever increasing number of children across the country as a result of these vaccines.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield was fired from his position for revealing the link between vaccines and autism. The doctor was charged for acting ‘unethically’ by the British medical regulators report. The general medical council accused him of acting: “with callous disregard for the distress and pain”. Doctor Cooper, a professor of pediatrics went on to lament:

“There is now this ocean of cynicism [about vaccines] in which all of us swim and it will take continued, sustained effort to undo it.”

Dr. Hilleman, a top scientist, and vaccine pioneer at the pharmaceutical company Merck admitted to infecting millions of people in Russia and the United States with the SV-40 cancer virus, which was put into the early strain of the polio vaccine. It was discovered later when they started testing cancer patients and found the simian monkey cells in the cancer, it was linked back to the vaccines using monkey kidney tissue.

In an interview by investigative journalist Jon Rappoport with an ex-vaccine researcher, the scientist who did not wish to disclose his name for fear of the consequences, stated that he realized the vaccine propaganda was a fabricated lie by the scientific community to sell drugs, because the vaccines often caused the disease they were marketed to protect against. He insisted the belief that vaccines had contributed to a higher standard of living was a hoax, because the improved standard came from: fresher food, hygiene, clean water and improved sewage systems. And if it wasn’t bad enough that they put in the standard chemicals like: formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum in all vaccines, there are a series of strange animal tissues and viruses put into them as well. The ex-vaccine researcher provides a brief description:

“Here’s a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called “brain-eating” amoeba.
Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I’ve found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.”
When Mister Rappoport asked the ex-researcher why vaccines were given even though they obviously caused so much harm he answered:

“As you’ve said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it’s true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.”

New legislation is being introduced in 42 states to require adolescents to take the Human papillomavirus, or HPV vaccine, which can cause permanent disability and death. Even with 22,000 cases reported, and 1,671 cases admitted by the CDC to be ‘serious’ there is still an on-going campaign to promote the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine. Dr. Diane Harper, professor of the University of Louisville, one of the researchers who helped to develop the vaccine said:

“Gardasil doesn’t last long enough to prevent cervical cancer and HPV infections are something that women continue to get throughout their lifetime.”

Monsanto has effectively gained government support with the ‘Monsanto Protection Act’ which eliminates federal regulations on separations of organic crops from genetically modified crops, like the ‘zero tolerance policy’ in Australia, also it protects against negative legal action, and limits judicial review; they have avoided the requirement of labeling their food, maintaining public ignorance of organic verses genetically modified organisms.

Genetically modified organisms are a complex, multi-faceted issue, which affects everyone. The implications of this biological, agricultural, and environmental scourge are enormous. Apathy and downright ignorance have prevailed to propel this sinister agenda forward. Domestically, and abroad it should be recognized for what it is, a genocidal soft-kill operation designed to bankrupt economies in both developing and industrial nations, it will wreak havoc on public health, and devastate the ecological habitat in multiple fashions. Genetically modified organisms have been shown to cause cancer and other diseases. The Monsanto protection act prevents legal action from being taken against the food giant. Also attempts to put regulations requiring food to be labeled GMO to differentiate from organic food have been stifled. The GMA, or Grocery Manufacturers Association are attempting to lobby for a bill which would prevent GMO labeling, while seeking approval from the FDA to label GMO’s ”all natural” on products.

Elites around the world, including Monsanto employees have already demonstrated their feelings about GMO products with their apparent distaste manifested in their abundant private organic gardens.

Glyphosates are the active ingredient in the herbicides used for crops, they are deemed safe, and the public is exposed to them on the streets from residue carried in the wind, and in the store from the produce, while the public has been assured safety gear is not needed for contact; Japanese scientists have found consuming more than 3/4 of a cup is deadly, and in California it is the third most common reported cause of sickness amongst the farmers, in Sweden scientists have linked Glyphosate exposure to leukemia, and lymphoma, and another study has linked recent increases in Parkinson’s disease in farmers with glyphosate exposure; other studies have shown a link between cell mutations and cell DNA damage which will ultimately ensure inevitable cancer and birth defects. More studies in Canada indicate sterility in mammals such as rats and rabbits; farmers exposed to glyphosates seemed to have caused sterility, premature births, and miscarriages.

Glyphosates pose many environmental damages, namely, ruining the soil; one incident of exposure can destroy soil microorganisms and arthropods, inevitably destroying the soil’s organic matter; glyphosates reduce nitrogen-fixing bacteria, this eliminates plants’ ability to use the bacteria to break down nitrogen in soil into forms it can use for nutrition; these herbicides, according to studies increase susceptibility to diseases because it reduces the plants’ ability to produce beneficial fungi which helps it to get nutrients; contrary to the official company statements from herbicide producers that glyphosates break down very quickly in the soil, it is in fact, more permanent than initially intimated to the public, in cases lasting at least three years when administered to crops, according to Swedish studies, however in warmer climates it can allegedly be eliminated from the soil in a year; in some cases, months after exposure the chemicals remain in fruits, vegetables working their way into the very tissue, and remaining even after futile attempts to wash them away; further studies indicate that glyphosates remain in the wheat even after processing, and that cooking cannot break them down.

When analyzing the corrupt above-the-law financial institutions:

JPMorgan Chase Bank has recorded 70 trillion worth of derivative assets on its books, this is the total worth of the world’s economy. Leaked IMF documents reveal deliberate economic terrorism directed at third world countries designed to blackmail leadership into compliance to greedy foreign policy.

An FBI investigation in 2004 revealed that there was an ‘epidemic’ of mortgage fraud, and that 80% of lending institutions were involved in illegal predatory lending practices. The banks who are too big to fail, and too big to jail, a concept expressed by Attorney General Eric Holder, if you prosecute them it would cause devastating consequences for the economy, so it is best just to leave them be, and let them continue to rob us blind, and commit criminal acts all over the place, on an unprecedented level. Unfortunately the foreign oligarchs have been degrading currencies and disrupting economies all over the world.

A good example of above-the-law financial institutions is the Federal Reserve, an agency that rarely gets scrutinized by the mainstream establishment media, and has avoid constant attempts at being audited is the Corporate Federal Reserve, which is NOT a government agency–“It’s about as federal as Federal Express!” You may have heard in reference to this agency.

The Federal Reserve central bank was found in 1913, and is often mistaken for a government entity, but is in fact a private corporation with government regulation, oversight of any kind, and absolutely no audits. They are, as former chairman Alan Greenspan said in an interview, above the law.

Hitler rose to power relatively quick considering all his rich American buddies like Chase Bank Funded Nazi Germany.

It has been determined that before and during world war two, Chase Bank financed the German Nazi regime.

Between 2004 and 2007 Wachovia handled funds totaling 378.4 billion for Mexican drug cartels. The transactions are the biggest violation yet of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money laundering law put in place in the US. Between 2006 and 2009 Martin Woods worked in Wachovia’s anti money laundering unit and quit after the bank discarded his report. He proved drug dealers were channeling money through Wachovia Bank.

2002 through 2009 HSBC, Europe’s largest bank with a net income of 16.8 billion dollars, was using its US operations as a gateway to assist in laundering money for Mexican drug cartels. Banks in Saudi Arabia and Bangladesh were believed to have helped fund the terrorist organization known as Al-Qaeda.

In the Mediterranean country of Cyprus the accounts of citizens and foreign investors are being attacked with a deposit tax. There is a 40% tax on accounts over 100,000 Euros, and a 16% tax on accounts under 100,000 Euros. Security guards were placed at the banks to regulate how much money was withdrawn.

Go back to the end of the tyrannical Bush era, and the beginning of the Obama administration, and we see the 2008 Bank Bailout which was paid for by the US taxpayers.

Initially 700 billion in tax payer dollars was given over to the banks and now that sum has reached over a trillion dollars to many banking giants from going under. Congress was threatened with martial law, and it was intimated in private conversation that there would be chaos and the country would be in financial ruin if they did not sign off on the bail-out. The Federal Reserve chairman Berneke was question about where all the trillions of tax-payer dollars went, he flat out said no, that he did not have to reveal the foreign entities.

Chase bank recently settled for a fine of $13 billion for $1 trillion of fraud charges for selling false mortgage-backed securities; it was uncovered that on top of their predatory lending practices they have over $70 trillion in assets on their books, which is about the size of the entire world’s economy. They received $25 million of tax-payer bail-out money and an additional $391 million in secret Federal Reserve bail-out money.

The criminal trans-national bankers operate above the law with nothing more than a slap on the wrist for punishment. Can an ordinary person fund known drug dealers and terrorists, launder their money, and avoid taxes without facing the most severe of penalties? Even though corporations are supposed to be people as well, it is safe to assume that the average working class citizen would be thrown in prison for the rest of their days, participating in illegal activities, under similar circumstances.

We must keep in mind the warnings of President Eisenhower during his final speech to the nation when he warned of the growing influence of the military-industrial complex and the rise of a scientific dictatorship that would destroy America.

We are entering a time when there is a very overt attempt to destroy the Constitutional Republic, first by gradually eroding the civil liberties, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. An example of eradicating civil liberties through what former Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson referred to as ‘administrative legislation’ is the current process of enforcing gun control not by an act of congress, but by eliminating the process of acquiring the firearms through an administrative process such as drying up the supply through bulk purchases of weapons and ammunition. So far, bills have been rejected by the Senate to restrict clips for certain guns.

There has been cases of confiscation in California, and Louisiana, also Connecticut instituted a gun registry, with citizens mindful of their second amendment rights actively reisisting. There have also been many instances of children being expelled or suspended from school for having colored toy guns, drawing pictures of guns, and playing cops and robbers. There have been cases of people reporting neighbors in possession of firearms—not because they were illegal, but because they ‘felt’ scared. A recent case in Utah, where open-carry is legal, a man had a gun in public and was arrested, not for anything dangerous, but because the police ‘didn’t know what he was going to do’.

This is an obvious case of projecting what Orwell called: ‘thought crimes’ onto the public. Senator Dianne Feinstein has openly stated her desire to confiscate all guns. President Obama has declared that he will exercise his right to executive orders to further his ‘unilateral agenda’ on guns, since he was unable to affect gun control through the legislative process. Recently a New York Mayor, John C. Tkazyik withdrew his membership from the Mayors Against Illegal Firearms, because he discovered their agenda to confiscate all guns. He admitted that New York’s strict gun laws did nothing to decrease violence, and in fact left citizens vulnerable to violent attacks. He stated:

“I don’t believe, never have believed and never will believe that public safety is enhanced by encroaching on our right to bear arms and I will not be a part of any organization that does.”

However, in the meantime, there are plans to reduce access to firearms by making the manufacturing process virtually impossible. One recent move to decrease ammunition came in the form of a concern for ‘global warming’ when reference was made to the lead content of the bullets.

Fear mongering has become more prevalent in the corporate controlled mainstream media since the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Statistically you are more likely to get struck by lightning than die in a terrorist attack, but nonetheless the media hypes the terror threat to a fever-pitched level.

Legislation for increased security measures like the ‘naked body scanners’ which were rolled out after the 2009 Christmas day underwear bomber fiasco are presented conveniently after a terrorist attempt, it has been proven many times that almost all these alleged terrorists are informants who have intelligence connections, either to the FBI, CIA, or MI6 British intelligence.

In a recent Foreign Affairs article entitled, “The Rand Paul Bubble” by Colin Dueck, Senator Rand Paul was criticized for his ‘isolationist’ attitude, the idea of refraining from foreign entanglements, imperialism and nation-building. Dueck makes a reference to the speech Senator Paul gave to the Center for the National Interest about diplomacy and making dialogue a primary concern for Syria, Iran, and North Korea, ‘’dialogue is always preferable to war,’’ he stated.

Dueck points out how he should be referred to as a ‘Jeffersonian’ or someone who wants to avoid military interventions; Dueck then continues to say that although ‘Jeffersonians’ are quite popular right now in the Republican party, that doesn’t matter because they usually have a tendency to ‘Jacksonianism’ which he describes as: a nationalist who takes pride in the US military, values sovereignty, honor, well-being, and security in a dangerous world—these types, he claims tend to have an inherent mistrust for ‘elite-sponsored legal, multi-lateral, and idealistic plans for global improvements’, but once their country is attacked they are ‘relentless’ and ‘unyielding’.

Senator Paul wants to cut military spending, strategic disentanglements, foreign aid, and scaling back the national security state—including the targeting of and surveillance of suspected terrorists—this last point is obviously intended as a blow below the belt to imply Senator Paul is soft on terrorism, or that he is indifferent to the threat.

What Dueck fails to point out is the loosely defined term of ‘terrorist’ and how concepts like: ‘the enemy combatant’ can be easily manipulated to include American citizens. The term seems to be used to demonize political enemies.

According to the 2009 Department of Homeland Security report: ‘Right-Wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalizing and Recruitment’, the new terrorists are gun owners, veterans, anti-war protestors, immigration protestors and those suspicious of the federal government; this report repeatedly combines what it refers to as ‘right-wing extremists’ with white supremacist groups.

It constantly refers to an ‘anti-government’ attitude, disgruntled people obsessed with the new African American President, and those angered over the increasing immigrant population—libertarian constitutionalists are also categorized with all of the above. Anyone who makes reference to a ‘new world order’ or a ‘north American union’ are also suspects of terrorism.

According to the leaked 2009 MIAC Strategic Report on the Modern Militia Movement, those who are critical of the federal government, the corporate Federal Reserve, libertarians, constitutionalists, Christians, those who support third party candidates, and citizens concerned with sovereignty or ‘common law’ are considered terrorists.

The Foreign Affairs article continued to criticize the patriotic nationalism espoused by conservatives and the Senator’s lack of ‘internationalist’ ideals. He is further marginalized for his ‘anti-establishment’ attitude, and he is reduced to nothing more than an idealistic dreamer with no chance of being elected.

Political think tanks like The Club of Rome promote concepts like: ‘global governance paradigms’, ‘changing outmoded practices like capitalism and democracy.’

On the Atlantic Council website, there is an article by Harlan Ullman, stresses the point of the elite losing their control, and he emphasizes the main goal to eliminate threats to the power structure: ‘eliminating the empowered individual’.

The article goes on to lump whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning with terrorists, and he goes on to suggest the further overt implementation of the Hegelian dialectic, the problem, reaction, solution model of creating a crisis and offering a solution to the public in the midst of wide spread panic. Ullman states:

“Without an extraordinary crisis, little is likely to be done to reverse or limit the damage imposed by failed or failing governance.”

Ullman continues by insisting civil liberties and sovereignty are the menace:

“In essence, the 365 year-old Westphalian system that placed sovereign states as the centerpieces of international politics is being tested and in some cases made obsolete by the empowerment of individuals and non-state actors.”

It is obvious that various liberties are being stripped away with the justification of security. The fourth amendment is being decimated with: DUI checkpoints, seatbelt checkpoints, random blood-draw/mouth-swab checkpoints, eating-while-driving checkpoints, and also the increasing use of warrantless wiretapping on a massive scale.

The NSA monitors 200 million text messages a day, storing all phone calls, monitoring all internet searches and emails, and installing chips in all new electronic devices to enable them to transmit a signal allowing constant access to that device regardless if it is turned on or not. These are just a few of the gross abuses of the fourth amendment that have been leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

The second amendment is under attack with ‘common sense’ gun measures put into place to make everyone ‘safe’ and soon the right to bear arms will be destroyed completely with tight regulations on clips and ‘gun-free zones’ put into place on school and military grounds.

The absurdity of restricting citizens’ rights to bear arms is worse when one considers the links that President Obama has with many terrorist organizations: The Weather Underground, The Muslim Brotherhood, and Al-Qaeda (Al-CIA-da). In 2013 Obama waived section 40 and 40a of the Arms Export Control Act to supply ‘Al-Qaeda freedom fighters’ in Syria with weapons. The government has demonized the purchase of firearms, while simultaneously the DHS purchased 1.6 billion of rounds of hollow point rounds for ‘practice’ (despite the fact experts have pointed out the absurdity of using hollow point bullets for practice), and there was also a purchase of paper targets depicting civilians: pregnant women, children, elderly, and more.

Mass surveillance on the population is justified by the supposed ‘war on terror’ launched in the wake of the attacks of 9/11. No instance can be presented demonstrating how this intrusive omnipresent surveillance system has prevented terror attacks, but it remains in place, and in fact, continues to grow. There is much evidence that actually points out that there was a plethora of evidence warning of inevitable attacks on buildings with commercial aircraft used as weapons prior to 9/11 from various intelligence agencies, plus multiple foreign intelligence agencies. There were specific warnings about the Al-Qaeda (Al-CIA-ada) terrorist organization, and Osama Bin Laden before the attacks going all the way back to the Clinton administration. Warnings to the Bush administration about radical islamists fell on deaf ears.

The increased surveillance system and police state has become more pervasive in everyone’s lives. President Obama said in a PBS interview that US persons don’t have their telephone calls listened to and their emails read. James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, perjured himself when he denied to Representative Ron Wydnen of Oregon who asked directly if there was NSA spying on Americans. It has been revealed that not only is there massive spying to an obscene level, but the data from search engines and financial transactions is being stored to sell to corporations to better forecast economic climates, create consumer profiles, and strategize the most effective methods to advertise to customer’s individually based on past purchases, and interests. After it was revealed that there was an on-going system of illegal data collection and spying, President Obama came out with a cool attitude claiming it wasn’t a big deal, Paul Revere, he claimed, did the same thing, and these NSA agents, he reminded us, are our friends and neighbors.

This is a blatant violation of the fourth amendment, the right be secure in one’s person, house, papers, and effects. The above mentioned actions are a complete disregard for the tradition of the presumption of innocence. Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden are being condemned and linked with terrorism for revealing the government’s illegal actions. President Obama stated recently that Snowden’s revelations about the NSA spying on the American people will have severe consequences that will not fully understand for years to come.

With the rise of the surveillance state, the public is being conditioned to accept omnipresent voyeuristic behavior, a panopticon, much like the world of Orwell’s 1984 where everyone must be perpetually cognizant of Big Brother’s gaze. Gradually, over time, and through subtle means the once high valued individual liberties will be compromised and expectations of privacy will diminish. The methods employed to gain unquestioned power are classic psychological techniques used to control the public through means of operant conditioning; for example the collection of meta data, in the ever emerging science of ‘neuroeconomics’ is claimed to not violate the public’s fourth amendment rights while information called ‘meta-data’ is retrieved through financial transactions and internet searches, tracking every customer’s behavior, which determines the most effective ways to promote various products to them, like Amazon’s new ‘preemptive packaging program’ that claims to predict what customers will order before they know it themselves.

The tech giants at the heads of the major corporations are developing devices sold to ‘make life easier’ or more ‘convenient’—to empower the population in ways never before seen. With new devices like Google Glass, a product that allows one to access the internet via hi-tech glasses, also now available in contact lenses.

Electronic enhancements have already been immersed into our culture, and will continue to become more commonplace. The advancement in these electronic prosthetics will undoubtedly increase the value of life for many people, and it will be easy to justify diminishing privacy rights with claims that the ‘antiquated constitution’ wasn’t written with such advanced technology in mind so a rationale will inevitably be created to modify the laws already in place.

RFID chips are slowly making their way into our lives, soon they will no longer have the negative stigma attached to them. They are installed in various products for demographic tracking purposes, they are in almost all credit cards, they are being introduced in some areas of employment by both government and private corporate agencies as a way to track workers.

New Samsung Galaxy phones with biometric analysis iris scanning software, or Iphones with thumb print scanning, social media venues such as Facebook provide the most accurate biometric data bases in the world with all the necessary information to identify anyone at any time.

All these so-called elements of technological progress are being sold as means for empowerment, but given the nature of such pervasive tools we must be wary of the potential loss of privacy, and the possibility of a new type of slavery. It is important to note the psychological technique of ‘operant conditioning’ at this point, because it fits the scenario described accurately. With operant conditioning, the subject in question can be trained in a sense to react to certain stimuli, and eventually over time a desired behavior will take over through means of positive and negative reinforcement. Think of a reward system for good behavior that you want to encourage. To train an animal, the negative behavior is not acknowledged, but something good like a correct response to a certain command is rewarded with a treat. The famous example is Doctor B.F. Skinner, who trained dogs to salivate when they heard the sound of a bell. They associated the ringing from the bell with the acquisition of food. After a time, the food was removed and the stimulus of the bell caused the anticipatory salivation. One can increase their average of positive outcomes based on reinforcing selective behavior. It is a very gradual process, and difficult to detect on a large scale unless you know what to look for.

The Transportation Security Agency is a perfect example of how the public has had its behavior modified over time. Naked body scanners, pods that lock a person inside until they are ‘cleared’, checkpoints with random blood draws and saliva swabs, the New York stop and frisk policy, and now the suggestion of cavity searches did not appear overnight.

All of these examples of guilty until proven innocent would not have been accepted right away after September 11th 2001. Compare the security that was introduced after the terrorist attacks, and fast forward to the attitudes and concerns about the violations of the fourth amendment with our current state of affairs—the complete invasive procedures designed to condition the public into accepting their predisposition to guilt.

With the elimination of the sovereign nation state, the dissolution of the individual—the biggest minority—into the collective ‘for the greater good’, and the prevalence of ‘global governance paradigms’, this is the beginning of the new slavery.

Technocracy is a method by scientific experts to control the public via advanced scientific methods in: Biology, physiology, and psychology. The end goal is to social engineer the public into a ‘stable’ mode of being, using controlled scientific disciplines. Three basic principles will be applied to reach this stability model, this includes operant conditioning and intense drugging from a young age, the development of a system where everyone is taught to ‘know their place’, and define clear differences, basically the assignment of jobs early on in life by the government, an acceptable mainstream drug would be introduced that would alleviate anxiety at any given time so reality is not too overwhelming, and finally a concrete form of eugenics that would create a legitimate actualized ‘caste system’ where there would be literally different levels of humans co-existing in society; the regular humans, and ‘sub-humans’. We are seeing an innovative form of eugenics in the form of the popularized movement of Trans Humanism.

Proponents of this philosophy assert the inevitable phenomenon of man merging with machines, during what is referred to as ‘The Singularity’. There would exist two classes of humans after the alleged ‘singularity’, one super-class of humans who accepted electronic augmentations and a second class of humans who were left behind, because as Ray Kurzweil stated, there will come a time when biological evolution will be too slow compared to the technological self-propelled evolution, post singularity.

These augmentations are not simply chips implanted in the brain to cure Alzheimer’s disease, exoskeletons to cure paralysis, or bionic eyes for the blind, but these electronic extras are already being implemented in subtle ways into our lives via social media, and continuously improved electronic devices—nothing more than sophisticated tracking devices—such as smartphones. These are methods of causing people to become accustomed to living their lives through these social media outlets, and convenient devices, while forgetting their external real lives, consequently detaching themselves from their destiny. These devices appear to be the precursor for the goals outlined on the Project2045 website. The first step of the process is to develop an avatar of oneself to complete mundane tasks, and eventually a person’s consciousness could be uploaded into the avatar.

Aldous Huxley, in his book Brave New World wrote of a new scientific dictatorship where the citizens would learn to love their servitude. He illustrates this concept by explaining the likelihood of a future ‘controlled society’ where children are raised by the state, and conditioned to accept abhorrent circumstances, they will have an unbreakable loyalty to it.

In the past, Huxley recounts, mankind was dominated by religious institutions that claimed to guarantee man’s salvation if only they could be in charge of society, but ultimately man was won over by progress and science, and the old ways of stifling dissent were too inefficient, which paved the way for the creation of a new totalitarian government ruled by scientific experts, who eliminated the possibility of rebellion by eradicating the personality type that would first conceive the notion of going astray from the herd. This new scientific dictatorship, a new decree of ‘social stability’, which formed as a result of the confusion from a series of fast-paced scientific innovations– what Brzezinski referred to in his book, Between Two Ages as ‘the war of the three Americas’—the rural, the industrial, and the dawning hi-tech scientific elites, or Technocrats.

Modern day aspects of this prophesy are manifesting in the form of giant pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising, and the creation of new forms of behavioral problems by the psychiatric institutions. There is an increased justification to medicate all young children with the intent to treat issues such as ‘attention deficit disorder’, which according to a recent psychiatric whistleblower, Dr. Leon Eisenberg, in a death bed confession admitted that ADHD is a ‘fictitious disease’. According to the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, in America, 20 million children are prescribed drugs for ADHD and other fantasy illnesses of Big Pharma, and 1 million children have been admittedly misdiagnosed with a fake behavioral condition.

There are also new ‘anxiety vaccines’ which are being introduced as a way to live a healthy life, but these are nothing more than modern day lobotomies, literally brain-eating viruses that destroy areas of the brain thought to cause stress and anxiety, which along with fear are key components of survival.

Other aspects reflecting the story outlined by Huxley in his famous dystopian novel Brave New World are the removal of children from the family unit, what they call ‘blood surrogates’ or their biological parents is a taboo concept. . In this society the idea of a ‘home’ is strange, and the concept of family is perverse. Chilling similarities to this dystopia novel are manifesting around the world, like in France where the terms ‘mother’ and ‘father’ are being banned. Everyone is a test tube baby, they are conditioned from childhood to unconditionally accept their slavery, they are taught to despise anything that would nurture their creative desires or instincts for self-sufficiency. The scientific dictatorship, the ultimate revolution ensured that they would love their servitude.