Twitter patent surfaces off the starboard bow

IPcopy writers

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

IPcopy took a quick look at the Twitter Innovator’s patent agreement recently and concluded that there was probably enough wiggle room in the agreement to allow Twitter to start legal actions against most people should they want to do so (see the earlier post here).

One thing that struck us at the time of writing the earlier article was the relative lack of Twitter patents and patent applications (we could only find three such patent documents and one of these belonged to TweetDeck).

Now comes news that Twitter has been working on another patent filing which reads much more closely onto their core business. This now grantedUS patent (US 8401009) can be found here. So, I hear you ask (probably), “How come you didn’t see that coming”? Good question.

A quick check of the patent register on the USPTO website (public PAIR) for the above patent shows that when Twitter made their application back on 22 July 2008 they asked for the application to not be published at the normal 18-months-from-filing point.

This option is open to applicants in the US system if they certify that the US application in question has not and will not be the subject of an application filed in another country/international agreement that requires publication at 18 months. [Question: is this still the case after AIA?]

Given Twitter’s public “for defensive purposes only” stance we can’t help but wonder why they kept this under wraps for so long?

Claim 1 of the new patent, by the way, reads as follows:

1. A method for device-independent point to multipoint communication, the method comprising: receiving from a first computing device of a first user a selection of one or more endpoints for receiving update messages; receiving, from the first computing device, a request to follow a second user; designating, by a computer processor, the first user as a follower of the second user in response to the request, wherein designating the first user comprises configuring an account of the first user to reference update messages broadcasted by the second user; receiving, from a computing device of the second user, a broadcast request to broadcast an update message in a first format, wherein the update message lacks identification of the first user as an intended recipient, and wherein the update message includes an identification of the second user as a sender of the update message; identifying, by the computer processor, a plurality of followers of the second user in response to the broadcast request, wherein the first user is among the plurality of followers; determining addressing information of each of the plurality of followers, wherein the addressing information of the first user identifies the endpoints for receiving messages; applying, for each of the plurality of followers, rules to the update message based on the addressing information; translating the update message into an appropriate format for each of the endpoints; and broadcasting the update message to each of the endpoints in the appropriate format.

2 Comments

So, at exactly what time did the general public find out that Twitter was applying for this patent? Was there any time at which a member of the public was able to submit prior art to the USPTO with regard to this patent application?

As far as I’m aware the Twitter patent referenced above did not publish until the patent had issued (so earlier this month). In such circumstances, I understand there’s no way of disclosing prior art directly to the USPTO.

If the existence (rather than the actual content) of a patent application that is subject to a non-publication request was known of prior to grant then I guess it would have been possible to send the prior art to either the inventors or the attorneys involved (and they would have a duty to disclose information relevant to the patentability of the claims).

For a granted patent (that had been the subject of a non-publication request) then I think the route to challenging the patent after grant would involve a re-examination proceeding.

I note that the above comments are only to the best of my understanding and that I’m not a US attorney. If you need specific input into your situation then you would need to talk to a legal representative and/or a US patent attorney.