Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed…

…the experience of this girl has a very uncomfortable racial element to it, which is often not spoken about.

In both cases, they were white girls and the gang members were Asian.

Emma says: ‘Most of the men running the sex slave gangs in the north of England are Asians of Pakistani origin. But very few of the authorities will admit this.’

Is she right to say so? If she is, why are so few people in officialdom willing to discuss the issue?

One charity — Risky Business, operating in Rotherham — refused to answer any questions on the racial make-up of the gangs, although, with the help of Emma herself, it counsels scores of white girls who have been sexually exploited by Asians.

At another charity, Coalition for the Removal of Pimping, based in Leeds, the chief executive Gillian Gibbons said: ‘This is a crime committed by men. We are trying to work in their communities to change their attitudes to women. I cannot comment on the race of the criminals involved.’

Meanwhile, another Asian youth worker — himself a reformed former pimp — told the Mail that while the gangs’ main aim was to make money there were also cultural issues at play.

‘Asian men in these gangs believe white girls have low morals compared with Muslim girls. They believe they wear what they describe as slags’ clothing showing their bodies, and deserve what they get.’

***And what not even the Daily Mail mentions is that Mohammed had sex with a nine year old.

Once again, we have the very (elite white) people (self-) appointed to “fix things” refusing to accurately name what is going on.

And people wonder why nothing ever changes.

But who cares? We keep paying the experts’ salaries and benefits and that’s all they really care about.