(a) whether the disbursement of Central
Government Pension to many beneficiaries have been stopped due to non-linking
of same with the Aadhaar number and if so, the details thereof, State/UT-wise
including Punjab;

(b) whether the Government proposes to exempt
beneficiary patients suffering from leprosy or any other grave disease and
hence unable to provide their biometric details and if so, the details thereof
and if not, the reasons therefor;

(c) the other steps taken by the Government to
facilitate such beneficiaries patients; and

(d) whether the Government is considering some
alternative option for such beneficiary patients and if so, the details thereof
and the steps taken by the Government in this regard?

ANSWER

The Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance

(a) to (d): The Government has not issued any
instructions for stopping disbursement of pension to Central Government
pensioner due to non-linking of the pension account with the Aadhaar number.

Instructions have been issued by the
Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare (DoP&PW) from time to time
that in view of the difficulty faced by old and infirm pensioners, banks should
make concrete effort to provide the facility of obtaining life certificate from
the premises/ residence of such pensioners. The instructions also provide that
in case of sick and infirm pensioners, personal appearance may be exempted if a
life certificate in the prescribed form signed by some specified authorities is
produced on the behalf of Pensioners.

Further, all Pension Disbursing Banks have
also been advised by DoP&PW that where the finger prints of a pensioner are
not accepted by the system, the alternate mechanism of biometric, i.e. Iris
scanning, may be used in such case. In case, however, it is not possible to
have Digital Life Certificate either through finger prints or through Iris
scanning, the physical life certificate submitted by the pensioner may be
accepted to avoid any harassment to the pensioner. In no case a pensioner
should be returned without accepting his life certificate on account of
non-acceptance of his biometric by the system.

Has your parcel been lost by the India Post? If yes, you are not the
only one. But the question to ask is whether you have been compensated
for it. No? Here’s good news for you. The postal department can no
longer throw the rule book at you and wash its hands off its
responsibility of successfully delivering your parcel. According to a
recent consumer court ruling, India Post is liable to compensate a
customer for the lost parcel, the value of its contents besides payment
towards causing mental harassment and legal charges incurred.
The court, in its ruling, also said the responsibility of a government
unit towards the public it serves is double that of its private
counterpart. The case of lost parcel Shripal Shah, a city-based
businessman dealing in organic food and natural products, had sent three
parcels via post to Islampur village in West Bengal in July 2015. The
parcels contained 21 kg of handspun yarn of non-violent silk with
natural dye and were being sent for weaving. For each parcel, Shah paid
delivery charge of Rs 268 at the department’s city head office in
Navrangpura.

However, while two parcels were delivered successfully, one went
missing. It weighed 7.29 kg and was worth Rs 28,700. Shah said he kept
checking the status of the delivery online. “The system showed that the
parcel had reached Kolkata. But there was no progress after that. I made
several complaints in writing to the head office and even called them
up to take stock of the situation. However, every time I was
told that inquiry was on,” he said. Finally, after losing all hope, he
approached the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum (CDRF), Ahmedabad
Additional, on October 6, 2016. He claimed Rs 28,700 with 18% interest
and Rs 10,000 each for legal cost and mental harassment.How he won the case

During hearing of the case, the defence advocate said the postal
department was willing to refund delivery charge collected for the
missing parcel, but argued that they would not pay for its content as
they were not aware of what was inside. He added that the consumer
should have got the parcel insured. However, the complainant’s advocate,
Darshak Trivedi, countered saying that the office had not asked about
the item or its cost while weighing it. He further argued that
once payment had been made, it was the responsibility of the post office
to ensure the parcel reached its destination. He added that instead of
asking the consumer, the postal department should have taken insurance
if they were unsure of delivery of the parcel or feared it would be
stolen. When the defence cited section 6 of the Indian Postal Act and
argued that neither the post office nor its officer was responsible in
case of an error or theft during the process of delivery by post, the
prosecution pointed out that Act also includes a section where the
department would be held responsible if there was deficiency in services
or scope for fraudulence. To support his argument, prosecution
lawyer Trivedi also presented the National Commission judgment of 2016
before the court wherein the commission ordered the postal department to
pay up the cost of a lost parcel with 9% interest along with Rs 50,000
for mental harassment The defence advocate refuted charges of deficiency
in service and said that the department was ready to refund the amount
collected for delivery of the parcel.The order

The CDRF, Ahmedabad Additional, ordered the post office to pay Rs
28,700 with 9% interest from July 17, 2015 till date it is paid, Rs
3,000 for mental harassment and Rs 2,000 for legal cost. The order came
on December 30, 2017. Putting aside the department’s argument that the
customer had chosen it as it was cheaper, the court observed that post
office is a government organisation and its responsibility double
towards the customer. Trivedi said, “It is the moral
responsibility of the postal department to see that the parcel reaches
the given address within the given time frame. It was within India and
should have been delivered. Showing a few sections of the Act, they
can’t get away from their responsibility. It was wrong on their part to
offer only the cost of the parcel.”‘Much delighted’

Expressing satisfaction at getting justice, Shah said, “I am happy with
the judgment. It takes a long time for a relationship to develop, but
such deficiency affects business and relationships with customers
immediately.” Acompetent authority from Navrangpura post office stated,
“The postal department will take a suitable decision as it deems fit.”

Monday, January 8, 2018

New Delhi, January 6: Almost 19 months have passed and the matter of minimum pay hike under 7th Pay Commission
is still in pipeline. In contrary to demands of the central government
employees to increase the minimum pay hike from Rs 18,000 to Rs 26,000 a
month, the Pay Commission headed by Justice AK Mathur and his committee had recommended the hike for Rs 21,000 only.

After the recommendation under the 7th Pay Commission was made to increase the basic salary of the government employees working in various departments of the central government, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley promised them the increment.

As
19 months have passed and now the government has not taken any firm
decision on the recommendation of the 7th CPC for minimum salary hike.

Also,
with the news out regarding the formation of new high-level committee
depicts the failure of the government to take a decision on the matter.
It also seems that the topic of a minimum wage is being dragged to trash
day-by-day.

With the delay in the decision, central government
employees are turning furious on the government’s ability to increase
the salaries. It is very disappointing to see that the Ministers of the
country are unable to keep their promises and are not even able to take a
firm decision on the matter.

The lingering hopes of the 1 Crore CG employees and Pensioners are being played on by the government.

By
these speculations, at one end false hopes are generated among
government employees, whereas the flickering decisions of the government
are bringing the hopes of the employees down.

Let’s see what is
stored in 2018 for 48 lakh government employees and 52 lakh pensioners
who are desperately waiting for the minimum pay hike under 7th Pay
Commission.

The year 2018 is expected to bring cheers for the central
government employees. After the 7th Pay Commission is implemented, the
salary revision policy of the government is set to change. There are
reports that the salary revision policy for central government employees
is all set to change.

Reports suggest that the government will change the salary revision structure from 2018. That is, there will be no 8th Pay Commission and the government would completely stop the pay commissions which have been in force since the independence.

Justice A K Mathur, chairman of the 7th Pay Commission, said
that the government should review the salary of central government
employees every year rather than forming new pay commission after the
long gap of ten years.This can be done every year looking into the data
available based on price index.

Revision to the salaries of central government employees can
be done on the basis of the Aykroyd formula. In this method, the
changes in the prices of the commodities that constitute a common man's
basket is taken into consideration. If the government adopts this
formula, the employees and government need not wait for ten years and
form a pay commission to review salary and pension of the central
government employees. It can be done by reviewing the inflation.

The Labour Bureau at Shimla takes a look at the changing prices of commodities periodically.

The government has not commented on this topic yet. Reports
say that a new revision structure for the salaries would be in force
from 2018.

Press Trust of India, New Delhi

The private member bill was rejected by 21 votes in favour and 18
against, after Vishambhar Prasad Nishad of the Samajwadi Party refused
to withdraw it twice, necessitating a division and voting on it.

Vishambar Prasad Nishad, while moving the Constitution
(Amendment) Bill 2016 (insertion of new article 16 A), sought the
support of the House for it, emphasising that due to lack of employment
opportunities, the youths were being forced to indulge in criminal
activities.(PTI Photo)

The
government narrowly escaped facing an embarrassment in the Rajya Sabha
on Friday, as the House rejected by just three votes a private bill
seeking to guarantee employment to every citizen above 18 years of age
or provide them unemployment allowance.

The private member bill
was rejected by 21 votes in favour and 18 against, after Vishambhar
Prasad Nishad of the Samajwadi Party refused to withdraw it twice,
necessitating a division and voting on it.

There were about 40 members in the House when the bill was being debated. The present Rajya Sabha has 245 members.

Nishad,
while moving the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2016 (insertion of new
article 16 A), sought the support of the House for it, emphasising that
due to lack of employment opportunities, the youths were being forced to
indulge in criminal activities.

In his intervention during the
debate on the measure, Labour Minister Santosh Gangwar said “Government
is committed to create new avenues of employment despite the fact that
it is not a fundmental right. There are well-crafted policies.”

Listing out government initiatives to create jobs, the minister urged Nishad to withdraw the bill.

Replying
to the debate and the minister, Nishad said Gangwar has not answered
his queries and was going by the BJP’s mainfesto which promised creation
of 2 crore jobs every year.

When Deputy Chairman P J Kurien asked
Nishad whether he would like to withdraw the bill, the SP leader
insisted on moving it for voting.

After a voice vote, the House went for a division in which 18 members supported the bill and 21 opposed it.

Earlier
moving the legislation, Nishad had said that “as per this bill, any
citizen of the country who has attained the age of 18 years should have a
right to emplyment and if he does not get it, there should be a
provision of unemployment allowance which should be decided by
Parliament.”

He
said there were various reasons for rise in joblessness in the country,
including rise in population, industrial closures and lack of
irrigation in various parts. “Unemployment has negative impact on the
growth of the country leading to rise in poverty,” he said.

Supporting
the bill, Ananda Bhaskar Rapolu of Congress said UPA regime in its 10
year rule provided stipend to around 14 crore people in the agrarian
sector.

However, the BJP-led government had promised in 2014 that
it would provide employment to over 2 crore people every year but in
reality, only around 80,000 jobs were being generated, he said.

Rapolu
said economic inequality in the country was rising and it can lead to
serious challenges like agitations and even civil war. “If employment
can be provided to all deserving people, only then peace can be
maintained,” he added.

Opposing it, Mahesh Poddar and Vikas
Mahatme (both BJP) said the focus should be on making people employable
rather than making them dependent on government allowance.

Vijila Sathyananth (AIADMK) said it is the right time to amend the Constitution making employment a right.

SP
member Alok Tiwari supported the bill saying lakhs of vacancies were
not being filled by the government, which also “does not know about the
exact situation of unemployment in the country”. He said employment
should be made a fundamental right and a commission be set up to fill
the vacancies.

Anil Kumar Sahani (JD-U) also supported the bill,
while D Raja (CPI) said if the government fails to address the problem
of unemployment, then it will also fail.

Similar views echoed by
Chhaya Verma (Congress) who said that as per estimates made by different
bodies, 15 to 20 crore people lost their jobs due to demonetisation.
She also raised the issue of charging GST on workers’ wages in some
states.

Neeraj Shekhar (SP) supported the bill saying the people
having BTech and MBA degrees were not getting jobs. He criticised
government for changing its stand on creating 2 crore jobs and now
saying that it would create job-givers.

Formation of trade unions alone will not solve employee problems; we need overhaul of labour laws, and trade unions must work with the government, employers and employees towards reforming labour laws. This will boost job creation in the formal sector.

Last month saw the first trade union from the Indian information technology (IT) industry getting registered in Tamil Nadu. This got many worried, lest it open the floodgates with more trade unions coming up, leading to a possibility of unionism or collective bargaining or industrial unrest in an industry that was so far away from such contentious phenomenon. While there is nothing wrong with trade unions as such, most employers and industry bodies view them with suspicion because, unfortunately, trade unions in India have always made ‘job protection’ as their primary agenda. It is important to recognise that, unlike some developed economies, India does not have a ‘jobs problem’—our unemployment rate is 5%—but a ‘wages problem.’ Almost everyone in India who wants a job can get one, just not at the salary they want. It is also important to recognise that higher wages or value that people demand can only be provided by formal sector jobs. Our ‘wages’ problem arises because most of our enterprises are dwarfs (small companies that will stay small), rather than babies (small companies that will grow big). This massive informalisation of our enterprises is an important source of poverty for the average Indian worker because enterprises can only pay the wage premium if they are productive. The real agenda for trade unions in India should, therefore, not be protection of jobs, but enabling job creation in the formal sector.

In this context, we can take many learnings from the German example of labour reforms in the early 21st century. Hartz reforms in 2003 reduced and capped unemployment benefits, with the goal of encouraging people to look for jobs. The unions realised that, post the fall of the Berlin Wall, companies had the option to move their production base to low-wage, former communist countries and they would, sooner or later, move away from high sector-wide or region-wide wages at home, so they decided to adapt to retain jobs for their people. The focus was not on protectionism or subsidy, but getting people quickly into a job by way of both encouraging job creation and upskilling of workers. These reforms, eventually, led to a massive reduction in unemployment rate in Germany—from 11% to 5%—with manufacturing making up almost 25% of the German economy and Germany becoming the third-largest exporting nation in the world. With almost 10 lakh job seekers entering the job market every month, Indian trade unions also need to rethink their approach if they really want to protect the interest of the average Indian worker. They need to enable labour law reforms required for creating more formal sector jobs and support large-scale vocationalisation of higher education to raise the number of apprentices in India from 4 lakh to 1.5 crore (the number we could have if we had the same proportion of our labour force as Germany in apprenticeships). Aside the change in mindset within the unions, the Trade Unions Act, 1926, itself needs modification. The main objective of this Act was to provide for the registration of trade unions and to confer a legal and formal status on registered trade unions. However, in its current context, it does little to benefit either employers or employees, and hampers productivity and economic growth. According to the Act, a registered union needs to have just 10% or 100 workers, whichever is less, engaged in the establishment or industry. Given that most large organisations of scale today have thousands of employees, this low threshold of employees to form a union can lead to the proliferation of many trade unions in larger organisations. This not only requires employers to deal with multiple employee unions, but can also hinder the harmonious relationships or dispute resolution between employers and unions, as each union may have different interests. Further, 25% of the members in a trade union can be outsiders. This implies that the workers who are not directly employed in a particular company or establishment also have to be involved or engaged in discussions with employers in case of a dispute. The concept of outsiders interfering in the matters of an organisation not only leads to lack of transparency in day-to-day functioning, but also tends to encourage criminalisation and politicisation of unions, leading to industrial conflict.

To ensure that this Act delivers on its intended objective of positive empowerment of trade unions, it should be made mandatory that all members and office bearers in a trade union must be employed in the organisation. Further, the requirement to form a union should be increased from 10% or 100 workers to a minimum 20% of the employees, such that it limits the number of trade unions in a single, large corporate entity. This would not only make it easier for employers to have a dialogue with employee representatives or unions, but also prevent marginalisation or fragmentation of employee point of view by ensuring fewer but more effective unions. Over the last few months, the central government has been going slow on many of the other big-ticket reforms—this is largely due to lack of consensus on these reforms with other stakeholders and trade unions. Prominent Indian trade unions and their leaders have unified in their resistance to these much-needed reforms and have been rather unfairly equating labour law reforms with ‘hire and fire.’

Notwithstanding the near death and redundancy of Marxism, particularly in the Indian context, trade unions would do well to remember Karl Marx’s statement on the objectives of a trade union: “The trade unions aim at nothing less than to prevent the reduction of wages below the level that is traditionally maintained in the various branches of industry. That is to say, they wish to prevent the price of labour power from falling below its value.” (Capital V1, 1867, p. 1069). We must note that 90% of our workforce is employed by the informal sector, where the price of labour power falls below its true value. Trade unions need to acknowledge this as the real issue and work with the government, employers and employees towards the critical agenda of labour law reforms that will boost job creation in the formal sector. By stonewalling these reforms, the unions are not only diminishing their own relevance and credibility, but also doing a great disservice to the very employees whose interest they claim to protect.

Anomalies in implementation of 6th CPC

Posted On: 04 JAN 2018 3:03PM by PIB Delhi

A National Anomaly Committee, comprising 8 members from the Official-Side and 12 members from the Staff-Side was set up to settle the anomalies arising out of the implementation of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission.

There were five (5) meetings of the National Anomaly Committee where 55 anomalies were settled out of total 59 anomalies which were raised. The remaining 4 anomalies are pending finalisation.

A National Anomaly Committee comprising 9 members from the Official-Side and 13 members from the Staff-Side has been constituted to discuss the anomalies arising out of the implementation of the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission. An agenda consisting of 18 items has been received from the Staff-Side for discussion which is under examination for convening the first meeting of the Committee.

This was stated by the Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region (DoNER), MoS PMO, Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Atomic Energy and Space, Dr. Jitendra Singh in a written reply to question in the Rajya Sabha today.

Simplification of Labour Laws

Posted On: 03 JAN 2018 4:03PM by PIB Delhi

Reforms in labour laws are an ongoing process to update the legislative system to address the need of the hour so as to make them more effective, flexible and in sync with emerging economic and industrial scenario.The Second National Commission on Labour has recommended that the existing Labour Laws should be broadly grouped into four or five Labour Codes on functional basis. Accordingly, the Ministry has taken steps for drafting four Labour Codes on Wages; Industrial Relations; Social Security & Welfare; and Occupation Safety, Health and Working Conditions respectively, by simplifying, amalgamating and rationalizing the relevant provisions of the existing Central Labour Laws. Out of these, the Labour Code on Wages has been introduced in Lok Sabha on 10.08.2017 and subsequently, referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Labour. The rest of the codes are at pre-legislative consultative stage.

The process of Legislative reforms on Labour includes consultation with stakeholders including Central Trade Unions, Employers’ Association and State Governments in the form of tripartite consultation. Suggestions/comments received during the tripartite consultations are taken into account/considered while finalizing the amendment in various Act/Rules.

The Ministry has taken a number of legislative initiatives in labour laws during the last 3 years. Some of the important initiatives are as follows:

Ø Amendment to the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 by which eligibility limit for payment of bonus enhanced from Rs 10000/- to Rs. 21000/- per month and the Calculation Ceiling from Rs. 3500/- to Rs. 7000/- or the minimum wages.

Ø Payment of Wages (Amendment) Act, 2017 enabling payment of Wages to employees by Cash or Cheque or crediting it to their bank account.

Ø Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 provides for complete ban on employment of children below 14 years in any occupation or process.

Ø The Employee Compensation (Amendment) Act, seeks to rationalize penalties and strengthen the rights of the workers under the Act.

Ø Ministry has notified “Ease of Compliance to maintain Registers under various Labour Laws Rules, 2017” on 21st February 2017 which has in effect replaced the 56 Registers/Forms under 9 Central Labour Laws and Rules made there under in to 5 common Registers/Forms. The number of forms provided under 3 Central Acts/Rules has been reduced from existing 36 to 12. The register can also be maintained in digitised manner. This will save efforts, costs and lessen the compliance burden by various establishments.

Ø A Model Shops and Establishments (RE&CS) Bill, 2016 has been circulated to all States/UTs for adoption with appropriate modification. The said Bill inter alia provides for freedom to operate an Establishment for 365 days in a year without any restriction on opening/closing time and enables employment of women during night shifts if adequate safety provisions exist.

Ø A category i.e. Fixed Term Employment has been introduced under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to impart flexibility to an establishment to employ people in case of Apparel Manufacturing Sector to meet the fluctuating demands of the sector due to its seasonal nature.

This information was given by Shri Santosh Kumar Gangwar, Union Minister of State (I/C) for Labour and Employment in written reply to a question in Rajya Sabha today.

Pursuant to CO Memo No.ST/26-6(1)/2017-18(Postal),dtd 21.12.2017 the following Postal Assistants of Bhubaneswar Division have been promoted to the cadre of LSG(Postal) on regular basis in Level 5 of the Pay Matrix recommended by 7thCentral Pay Commission from the date of assumption of charge and allotted to Bhubaneswar Division.

Consequent upon their promotion to LSG Supervisor (Postal) cadre, the following order of transfer and postings is hereby issued to have immediate effect.

Sl. No

Name & designation of the Postal Assistant approved for promotion to LSG Cadre

Allotted to Head Qr. Region & Division on their promotion to LSG cadre

Place of posting on promotion

Date of effect of promotion

Relieving arrangement

1

Bishbnu Priya Dei,PA,Khordha HO

Bhubaneswar

DPM Khordha HO

30.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

2

Manoranjan Sarangi,OA,CSD

Bhubaneswar

APM(SB-II)BBSR GPO

28.03.2018

Supdt.CSD will make relieving arrangement

3

Susama Marandi,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

APM(Treasury),BBSR GPO

28.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

4

Durgabati Bihari,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM,Bhola SO

28.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

5

Biram Marandi,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

APM(Mail),BBSR GPO

The official will exchange formal charge report

6

Mukund Ch. Das,SPM,M.S Nagar SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, M.S.Nagar

27.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

7

R.N. Sahoo-III,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

PRI(P)-II,BBSR GPO

28.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

8

Abadhuta Pradhan, OA. Divnl.Office

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Patia SO

29.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

9

Ramesh Chandra Behera, PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Tamando SO

27.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

10

Ajeya Kumar Mishra, Acct, Divnl. Office

Bhubaneswar

Accountant, BBSR GPO

28.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

11

Saudamini Praharaj, PA, BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

APM (Certificate), BBSR GPO

25.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

12

Kishore Kumar Jena,SPM H.C. Sahi SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM,Harachandi Sahi SO

The official will exchange formal charge report

13

Aurobindo Kanungo,Acct.PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

Accountant Divisional Office, BBSR

29.03.2018

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

14

Pabitra Mohan Nayak,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Balianta SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

15

Suchitra kabiraj,OA,PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

SPM,MRC SO

29.03.2018

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

16

Pravat Nalini NayakPA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Kuhuri SO

27.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

17

Simanchal Rath,SPM,Kedar Gouri SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Kedargouri SO

24.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

18

Pranab Kumar Dash,OA.PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

SPM Narangarh SO

28.03.2018

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

19

Prasanna Kumar Mohanty,PABBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Airport SO

25.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

20

Hemanta Kumar Ojha,PA,Bhoinagar SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM Bhoinagar SO

25.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

21

Sashmita Sahoo,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Bhimatangi SO

25.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

22

Archana Mishra,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Kalpana Square SO

25.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

23

Suravi Kar,PA,Ashoknagar MDG

Bhubaneswar

SPM,OSAP SO

29.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

24

Laxmidhar Panda,Acct,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Loco Settlement SO

25.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

25

Tapan Kumar Sahoo, SPM, Khandagiri SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Nayapalli SO

24.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement.Sri Tapan Ku. Sahoo if relieved earlier than the date of effect of promotion he will join at his new place of popsting as PA and his promotion to LSG cadre will count from the date of effect

26

Amita Kumari Mishra,OA,PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

LSGPAJatni MDG

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

27

Mano Ranjan Ghadei,SA,Divnl.Office

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Khandagiri SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

28

Raj Kumar Mansingh,OA,PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

SPM Singipur SO

29.03.2018

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

29

Pradyumna Kishore Moharana, Acct.BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM Balipatna SO

25.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

30

Santosh Kumar Panda,PA,Khordha HO

Bhubaneswar

SPM P.N.College SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

31

Rabi Narayan Satapathy, SPM Balakati SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, BalakatiSO

27.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

32

Tusharkanta Mishra, PA Baramunda Colony SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM Sailashree Vihar SO

27.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

33

Ramakrushna Sethy, Working as SPM Banapur SO

Bhubaneswar

LSGPA, Balugaon MDG

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

34

Pradipta Kumar Mohanty,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

APM, SB-I, BBSR GPO

29.03.2018

The official will exchange formal charge report

35

Santosh Kumar Nandi,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Banamalipur SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

36

Suprava Acharya (OH),PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Acharya Vihar SO

25.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

37

Arjun Sethy,PA,AG SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Baghamari SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

38

Binod Kumar Das,PA,BBSR-2 MDG

Bhubaneswar

SPM KIIT SO

27.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

39

Aparajita Tripathy,OA,Divnl.Office

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Kalupada Ghat SO

31.03.2018

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

40

Banita Tripathy,LRPA,Ashoknagar MDG

Bhubaneswar

LSGPA,Utkal University MDG

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

41

Namita Mallick,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, OEC SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

42

Baikuntha Nath Moharana, PA, Working SPM Balugaon Bazar SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Balugaon Bazar SO

The official will exchange formal charge report

43

Jitendra Ku. Mohapatra-I,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM Bolagarh SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

44

Pragyaparamita Sarangi, LRPA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, Bhatapatna SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

45

Bishnu Prasad Panda-II, PA , BBSR GPO a/t BSC SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM N.B. Chilika

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

46

Harish Chandra Tripathy, SPM,C.S.Pur SO

Bhubaneswar

SPM, CSPur SO

The official will exchange formal charge report

47

Sasmita Devi,OA,PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

SPM CRP Line SO

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

48

Banani Rath,PA,Ashoknagar MDG

Bhubaneswar

PRIP-I, BBSR GPO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

49

Suchismita Mohanty,PA,BBSR GPO

Bhubaneswar

SPM Odisha Assembly SO

The official will be relieved on office arrangement

50

Shibani Prusty,OA,PSD,BBSR

Bhubaneswar

LSGPA,Sahidnagar MDG

Supdt.PSD will make relieving arrangement

The officials should join in their new place of posting within one month from date of issue of posting order failing which it will be presumed that the they have declined the promotion.

The official may exercise their option choosing the date of fixation of their pay under FR-22(1)(a)(i) within a month from the date of assumption of charge. The official(s) already given financial up gradation under MACP scheme are not eligible for benefit of fixation of pay by virtue of their promotion.

Relevant charge reports may be sent to all concerned in due course.

On joining of the above approved LGS officials, the following officials in PA cadre shall remain attached temporarily to the offices noted against each until further orders.

Sl No

Name of the Postal Assistant

S/s

Present place of posting

Office/Post to which remain attached

1

Sushil Hansdah

SPM,Bhola SO

PA,Bhubaneswar GPO

2

Krupasindhu Banara

SPM,Patia SO

OA,Divnl. office Bhubaneswar

3

Prabira Mohan Sahoo

SPM Balianta SO

PA,Ashoknagar MDG

4

Jakir Hossen Khan

SPM MRC SO

PA,Ashoknagar MDG

5

Sandip Srichandan

SPM Narangarh SO

PA,Khordha HO

6

Bajan Tudu

SPM,Air Port SO

PA,Bhoinagar SO

7

Santilataq Rath

PA,Bhoinagar SO

OA,PSD,Bhubaneswar

8

Ranjan Kumar Nayak

SPM,Bhimatangi SO

PA,Bhubaneswar GPO

9

Biswanath Soren

SPM,Kalpana Square SO

OA,PSD Bhubaneswar

10

Dillip Ku .Satapathy

SPM,Nayapalli SO

OA,Divisional Office

11

Amzad Khan

SPM Singipur SO

PA,Banapur SO

12

Bhawani Prasad Kar

SPM P.N.College SO

P,Khordha HO

13

Rohit Kumar Behera

PA,Balugaon MDG

PA,Banapur SO

14

Niranjan Biswal

SPM,Acharya Vihar SO

PA,AG SO

15

Sishir Kanta Nayak

SPM Baghamari SO

PA,Khordha HO

16

Ayub Khan

SPM Kalupada Ghat SO

PA,Khordha HO

17

Santosh Ku. Rout

SPM OEC SO

PA,Bhubhaneswar -2 MDG

18

Amiya Ranjan Ojha

SPM N B Chilika SO

PA Balugaon MDG

Further on joining of he above approved LGS officials, the following officials in PA cadre shall back to the office of their posting as detailed below.

Sl No

Name of the Postal Assistant

S/s

Present place of posting

Office/Post to which remain attached

1

SK.Hananullah

SPM,Balipatna SO

PA,Bhubaneswar GPO

2

Ripon Asish Senapati

SPM,Sailashree Vihar SO

PA,IRC Village SO

3

Chandu Murmu

SPM Banamalipur SO

PA,Bhubaneswar GPO

4

Baishnab Ch.Das

SPM Bhatapatna SO

PA,Bhubaneswar GPO

5

Upendra Pradhan

Working as SPM OSAP SO

PA,Utkal University MDG

Part-II

The following transfer and postings in the in the cadre of LSG officials are hereby ordered to have immediate effect in the interest of service until further orders.

Sl No

Name of the LSG Official

Present place of posting

Place of posting on transfer

Relieving arrangement

1

Dipti Ranjan Mohanty

SPM KIIT SO

APM(Counter)

BBSR GPO

The official will be relieved on joining of Sri Binod Kumar Das,PA,BBSR-2 MDG official at Sl.38 of Part-I

2

Jayashree Nayak

SPM Odisha Assembly

SPM Siko SO

The official will be relieved on joining of Smt. Suchismita Mohanty official at Sl.49 of Part-I

3

S.N.Pattnaik

SPM CRP Line

LSGPA,BBSR-2 MDG

Sr.Postmaster, Bhubaneswar GPO will immediately depute one PA to take charge of CRP Line SO.

Total Visitors

Feedjit

Pioneers of P&T Trade Union Movement

Disclaimer

The viewers are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s) and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog since the All India Postal Employees Union, Group- C, Bhubaneswar Divisional Branch accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise of the contents or reliability of linked websites for the same have been provided in the interest of public convenience only and we are neither responsible for the contents nor necessarily endorse the view expressed within the linked websites. Contents published in this blog are meant for information of the readers only and forbidden for legal purposes.