Phorm "Edited and Approved" UK Government Advice

Barence was one of several readers to send in word that the UK Home Office checked whether its interpretation of the law suited Phorm, before issuing advice on the legality of the controversial advertising service. The Home Office and Phorm entered a dialogue about the company’s services back in August 2007, at Phorm’s request. In an email sent to Phorm in January 2008, a Home Office official writes: ‘I should be grateful if you would review the attached document, and let me know what you think.’ After Phorm made deletions and amendments to the document, the Home Office sent another email to the company stating: ‘If we agree this, and this becomes our position do you think your clients and their prospective partners will be comforted.’ From the BBC: “Baroness Sue Miller, Liberal Democrat spokeswoman on Home Affairs, told BBC News: ‘My jaw dropped when I saw the Freedom of Information exchanges. … Anything the Home Office now says about Phorm is completely tainted.'”

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 28th, 2009 at and is filed under . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.