If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

FYI... beware, this is scary.

Been away from the news for a while, so catching up can be real spooky, depending on your financial situation. Although I doubt this is good news for anyone.

UB

The FDIC Is in Trouble
by Bud Conrad
Los Altos, California

As we all know, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) guarantees depositors that they'll get their money back if a bank fails, at least up to a certain amount. To fund its operations, the FDIC collects small fees from the banks that are held in reserve for the purpose of taking over troubled banks and paying off depositors.

Since the Great Depression, a period marked by widespread runs on banks, the FDIC has done a good job of fulfilling its mandate. So how are they doing in this crisis?
"...using any reasonable accounting method, the FDIC is already bankrupt and will require hundreds of billions of dollars in government bailouts just to keep the doors open."In a nutshell, they are in trouble.

The FDIC insures 8,246 institutions, with $13.5 trillion in assets. Not all of them are going bankrupt, of course. Yet as of late July, a disturbing 64 banks had gone belly up this year - the most since 1992 - costing the FDIC $12.5 billion. At the end of Q1, the agency was already asking for emergency funding.

And worse, much worse, is likely yet to come. The following chart shows the total assets on the books of the FDIC's list of 305 troubled banks. The list doesn't include the biggest banks that are considered too big to fail, as they are being separately supported with bailouts. By contrast, if the banks on this list fail, the FDIC is on the hook to have to step in and take them over and, of course, make depositors whole.

Other measures of how serious the losses at banks are becoming can be seen in the chart below, which shows charge-offs and non-current loans at all banks. You can see that the Net Charge-offs remain stubbornly high, with banks charging off almost $40 billion in bad loans in the last two quarters alone. And the number of non-current loans - loans where payments are not being kept up - is soaring.

Together, these measures indicate the potential for more big failures and more big bailouts coming down the pike.

Into the battle against bank insolvency the Fed brings a level of reserves that can best be described as paper-thin. From almost $60 billion last fall, the FDIC's reserves have been drawn down to only about $13 billion today, a 16-year low. A quick look at the FDIC's own data shows us how inadequate those reserves are compared to the deposits they are now insuring.

The chart below says it all:

As you can see, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation currently covers each dollar on deposit with a trivial 2/10ths of a penny.

And even that understates the seriousness of the situation: the $4.8 trillion in deposits the FDIC is providing coverage on doesn't include the expansion that now extends insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 for normal bank accounts. That likely brings the exposure of the FDIC closer to $6 trillion. But that's pretty inconsequential at this point: using any reasonable accounting method, the FDIC is already bankrupt and will require hundreds of billions of dollars in government bailouts just to keep the doors open.

So, given the dire shape of its finances, what measures is the FDIC taking, you know, to batten down the hatches and all that?

For starters, they are expanding their mandate by guaranteeing bank loans - $350 billion and counting at this point. And the government has tapped the FDIC to play a pivotal role in guaranteeing the loans issued to buy toxic waste through the government's highly problematic and fraud-prone new Private Public Investment Partnership (PPIP). The FDIC's commitment to the PPIP is and may become limited based on its resources.

It is hard to draw any other conclusion but that hundreds of billions in new funding will be required to keep the FDIC operating. Given the catastrophic consequences of the FDIC failing, starting with a bank run of biblical proportions, there's no question it will get whatever funding it needs. By loading the new loan guarantee responsibilities and the PPIP onto the FDIC's back, the administration will go back to Congress and ask for the next large bailout.

Of course, in the end, all of this falls on the taxpayer, either directly in the form of more taxes or indirectly via the destruction of the dollar's purchasing power. Another bale of straw on the camel's back, and another reason to be concerned about holding paper dollars for the long term.

Regards,

Bud Conrad
for The Daily Reckoning

P.S. If you still trust the government to take care of you and yours when the you-know-what hits the fan, you're on the path to financial disaster. But even in times of crisis, there are things you can do to protect yourself - for example, by betting against the insane machinations of the government and Fed. You can't make them stop, but at least you can profit from them. Read about my favorite investment of 2009...by clicking here.

Editor's Note: Mr. Conrad holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. He has held positions with IBM, CDC, Amdahl, and Tandem. Currently, he serves as a local board member of the National Association of Business Economics and teaches graduate courses in investing at Golden Gate University. Bud Conrad, a futures investor for 25 years and a full-time investor for a decade, is also a regular lecturer for American Association of Individual Investors. In addition he produces original analysis for Casey Research, including unique charts and research on the economy and investment markets.

When the one you love becomes a memory, that memory becomes a treasure.

[QUOTE=Uncle Bill;481329]Been away from the news for a while, so catching up can be real spooky, depending on your financial situation. Although I doubt this is good news for anyone.

UB

Yes it is scary, but its not news. I'm no economist, but in my limited understanding of economics, when someone who is $11 Trillion in debt tells me they "have my back", that doesn't give me a warm, fuzzy feeling inside.

We used to have a balanced budget, and that, even with a 7 trillion dollar debt, showed we were attempting financially responsibility, and "good" for the money. Somewhere along the line, we totally disregarded financial responsibility, and began running record-high deficits, and pumped the national debt up to 11 trillion.

I'm not pointing fingers at any past administrations, so as to avoid the forum-police.

Come on now. Sheila's not going to let anything happen to the FDIC. Why she's almost as smart as Tim Geithner and we all know how smart he is.

And besides...do we REALLY need money anymore. I mean, afterall...Dear Leader will take care of us. He's handling our mortgage payments, the gas for our cars, the heating oil for our houses and he's buying our groceries. He's working HARD to make sure we have the very best healthcare possible and that won't cost anything either!! There's really no need for money here. Dear Leader will take care of it all!!