__________________Just a small town girl....TheMike-No way, dude.
Look how gangster he looks with that lean back, slightly closed eyes, shaggy hair at a formal event and a ****ty tie. OG Triple OG right there.ST- The Taylor Swift Thread: She makes our hearts melt!!

Itís possible if you've upgraded to Firefox v3.0.6, the subsequent upgrade necessitated a compatibility update to version 1.6 of Redirector; the combination of these two revisions has potentially interfered with the handing of expressions and relative URL parsing.

Meh, It takes ~1s to click the extra link. I don't mind it. For what it may prevent it is WELL worth the ~1s it takes to click.

-Froth

Oh really? I thought the mod would go against it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle

People who claim that they're "protected" because they run noscript don't truly understand how it works. Noscript by default just disables javascript on pages that they haven't explicitly trusted. There's nothing preventing me from creating a page that contains no javascript that captures login information. Noscript wouldn't protect you at all in that scenario.

A lot of the complaints I've seen so far are just reactionary. The time staff spends working with users reclaiming accounts, and the amount of grief users undergo when they do fall victim to phishing far outweigh the amount of time it takes to glance at a url and click it.

It's kind of almost sort of been a year and it's still REALLY annoying. But probably a few more years and I'll only hate it a little bit.