It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.info

No special photographic skills are required to assess the utter phoniness of the 9/11 IMAGE POOL: all what's needed is a healthy dose of common sense and a sound, rational mind. Now, whether the most glaring absurdities of this image pool were meant to be exposed - or if it was just caused by laziness/ sloppiness/ or over-confidence on the part of the perps - is a subject open for debate. Are the goons behind all this plain stupid? Foolhardy? Are they gauging the depth of the public's apathy? It matters little: The bottom line is, quite simply, that THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE. To debate just WHY this is the case may be an interesting exercise - but no such intellectual disquisitions could possibly help justify the absurd nature of these shots. Here follows a study of a (growing) 'family' of images published over the years, depicting the collapse of WTC2.

Up to a few years ago, this family had 'only' three members: I compiled them one by one - as I pursued my comprehensive scrutiny of all the available 9/11 STILL IMAGERY published by the news media. This photo-trio is officially credited to three different news media photographers:

We are asked to believe that all three of them captured the below three still photos of the WTC2. In addition to these images' remarkably similar viewing angles we can see that, by observing the smoke patterns, all three are clearly meant to have been snapped at the exact same split second in time. Imagine that! (Moreover, one may legitimately wonder why the blue Millenium Hotel is entirely missing in image 1 and 2):

But it gets sillier still. In 2010, a huge batch of never-seen-before, higher-quality 9/11 imagery suddenly emerged on the scene. The official explanation - get this - was that ABC (yes, the TV network!) had filed a FOIA to force NIST to release heaps of imagery that they had, allegedly, used for their investigations - and kept under wraps for all of 9 years!...

Well, most of this never-seen-before imagery comes in the form of short video clips (allegedly shot by "amateur videographers") which depict the crucial events of the day. At close inspection, most are nothing but rehashed/ re-rendered material which I was quite familiar with - having examined the 9/11 imagery for over half a decade now. But some of it is indeed brand new - and provides even further clues and confirmations as to how "the 9/11 IMAGE FAKERY FACTORY" operates. I have expounded about this in depth elsewhere, so let me just show you here what can be found in these "brand new amateur videos":

Here I compare AMY SANCETTA'S world famous still photo with a frame credited to one "ALFIE ALVARADO":

So, we are now asked to believe that four cameras captured the exact same moment in time, from extraordinarily (if not impossibly) similar viewing angles/vantage points - AND zoom ratios. One only needs to calculate the odds of this occuring in the real world.

But there's more: Here is another threesomeof alleged "amateur" shots to be found in NIST's "new releases":

So, you may ask - can it get sillier than this? Yes indeed :

As you have seen in all the above shots, the ROOFTOP of WTC2 is seen tilting at a steep angle as it tumbles down. Well, here is a frame from another "new amateur video" released by NIST. It appears to be shot from the same side as the other shots (from a more distant location). You will only need your eyesight and common sense to realize that something is TERRIBLY wrong here. To be sure, we are looking at the very first seconds of the (proposed) WTC2 collapse - instants before the rooftop gets engulfed in smoke:

The 9/11 imagery was created with the extensive use of digital technology, much like a Hollywood production. The news media top brass was 100% complicit and knowingly aired artificial imagery on 9/11 - in order to simulate a "terror attack" - for the profit of everyone involved in the hoax. The WTC complex was of course demolished - but there exists no visual record of just how the towers were brought down. Moreover, and most importantly, the towers were empty and no one perished that day - as killing 3000 'Wall Street people" was certainly no part of the plan (and would have caused massive aggravation for the perps). But that's another entangled sham - and it's all being picked apart, here at Cluesforum.

Note: Any questions as to the chain of custody of the above imagery should be submitted to NIST, the Associated Press and the Norwegian news outlet "VG". As a honest and law-abiding person, I will not tolerate any further insinuations (such as can be found circulating around the web) that I, Simon Shack, have in any way tampered with or manipulated this imagery to pursue some non-descript, sinister agenda.

THE PLAIN PHONY 'PLANE' PATHScomparing the animatedtrajectories of "Flight 175"

The 'shock-&-awe' visuals of "FLIGHT 175 striking WTC2" were obviously a crucial part of the 9/11 hoax. As shown in September Clues, there are many ways to demonstrate that those visuals cannot represent reality - one of them being the absurdly conflcting trajectories of "FLIGHT 175". We can only guess whether these blunders occured due to flawed 3D imaging softwares - or the ineptness of their programmers and animation artists - or both. A case of whistleblowing? I doubt it.

There is, naturally, an ongoing damage-control effort to try and contain, ridicule, and distort the hard evidence exposing the piss-poor 9/11 computer imagery. The latest in line is "The Hologram Theory" upheld by a merry lot of rather 'prominent, self-proclaimed 9/11 truthers' - wherein they attempt to demonstrate (using graphic computer models, no less!) that the various "FLIGHT 175" trajectories seen on TV are, after all, perfectly consistent with each other! In other words, they are implying that: "The news media aired absolutely real & legit imagery. The "airplane" they captured on film was, in actuality, a (quite authentic) hologram!"

But let us take another good look at these "FLIGHT 175" trajectories, just to make sure that this part of the wider September Clues research isn't some sort of visual/optical illusion. For this, we will of course examine THE ACTUAL 9/11 imagery - and NOT some computer models /vector graphics attempting to re-simulate the simulation!... *rolleyes*So please note: this study is only - and specifically - about the "FLIGHT 175" TRAJECTORIES.

The "International Shot" (as I called it in SC) as aired LIVE on ABC is, undoubtedly, the 'visual imprint' that most people around the world would have of "FLIGHT 175". (Just a 2-second clip - so not of much interest for our trajectory study.)

Now, the only other LIVE shot showing the exact moment of impact was, of course, the infamous "NOSE-OUT" shot. Of course, that FOX clip doesn't show much of a trajectory either - since when rewinding the tape to 6 seconds before impact - there's just no plane to be seen at all !...

On LIVE 9/11 TV, the first time we see a "plane", is 16 seconds before the strike: the CBS "Divebomber" :

"THE DIVEBOMBER SHOT" - as aired on CBS

In fact, the "Divebomber" was the very first image of "FLIGHT 175" the world ever saw. The "Divebomber" initiates the fascinating "16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE" - which I have put together to show the SUM TOTAL of what the American people saw ON 'LIVE' TV that morning - on all combined TV networks. I call it "Magic", since it asks us to believe that these 4, seamlessly consecutive shots, were captured by 4 different cameras - BY CHANCE. Imagine/or compute the odds !

"THE 16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE"

********************************************So now that we have covered the sum total of LIVE IMAGES aired on TV on 9/11, let us look at the other "FLIGHT 175" trajectories shown AFTER the Live TV Show. On the evening of 9/11, NBC aired this other shot (at right):

At left: the LIVE NBC shot_________________At right: the NBC evening news shotExpounded at 12:48 in my full September Clues documentary viewable here : http://www.septemberclues.info

The TV networks also aired (later in the day) this other trajectory (below left) which shows "FLIGHT 175" actually making a final ascent. Of course, at NO POINT in time do we see, in the "Divebomber shot", the plane making a final ascent!:

FINAL ASCENT shot____________________________________________DIVEBOMBER shotExpounded at 1.04:44 in my full September Clues documentary viewable here : http://www.septemberclues.info

"FINAL ASCENT shot " - as aired on the BBC:Can anyone seriously argue/sustain that what we see here (an ascending path) is due to 'deceptive perspectives' ?

The"LUIS ALONSO shot"Now, in this alleged "amateur video" credited to one Luis Alonso, "FLIGHT 175" also seems to make a final ascent. However, just how this final ascent is depicted appears to be a physically/aerodinamically impossible feat. I trust every honest airline pilot and aeronautical expert will agree with this claim. By all means, if you find fault with this analysis, please let me know :

So again, did "FLIGHT 175" make a final ascent? Well, no - not according to that perfectly level approach purportedly filmed (according to the FBI) by some arabic jihadist from under the Brooklyn bridge (the so-called "AL-QAEDA shot")...

the "AL-QAEDA shot" versus the "Divebomber" shot

So, was "FLIGHT 175's" trajectory ascending/ descending /or perfectly level in its last seconds of flight ? What's it gonna be ? Is all of this, as naysayers say, "only a matter of perspectives - and just a series of optical illusions?" Can anyone really seriously claim that all the above trajectories are perfectly consistent with each other - thus credibly depicting the very same event as if captured by real cameras in the real world? You decide - but if your answer is "no", it should be transparently clear to you that the latest, fanciful "hologram theory" is nothing but the last, desperate attempt by the perps to get the TV networks 'off the hook' (as in white-washing the media of any complicity in the 9/11 scam). To be sure, the 'holo-huggers' core claim is that "FLIGHT 175 was fake (it was just a hologram projection) - but the 9/11 TV images were quite real and legit!"...

Here's a short tinyurl link to this post - feel free to use it to link to this page: http://tinyurl.com/plainphonyplanepaths( If you wish to post it on a Youtube comment section, you need to use this link : tinyurl . com /plainphonyplanepaths )