The "Middle East and Terrorism" Blog was created in order to supply information about the implication of Arab countries and Iran in terrorism all over the world. Most of the articles in the blog are the result of objective scientific research or articles written by senior journalists.

From the Ethics of the Fathers: "He [Rabbi Tarfon] used to say, it is not incumbent upon you to complete the task, but you are not exempt from undertaking it."

Friday, July 19, 2013

Boycotting the Untermenschen

by P. David Hornik

On
Tuesday, which was Tisha B’Av—a mournful Jewish holiday that
commemorates two destructions of Jerusalem, the Spanish Expulsion, and
other disasters of Jewish history—Israel’s far-left daily Haaretztrumpeted the news that the European Union had issued a new directive.

It bans any and all interactions, economic, social, or academic, with
Israeli companies or institutions situated in East Jerusalem, the West
Bank (Judea and Samaria), and the Golan Heights—that is, the places
Israel took over in the 1967 Six-Day War, where a total of 700,000
Israelis (not far from 10 percent of the country’s population) now live.

The directive also states that “all agreements between the State of
Israel and the EU must unequivocally and explicitly indicate their
inapplicability to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967.”

In the run-up to the Six-Day War—among other such statements—Egyptian
president Gamal Abdel Nasser said, “Our basic objective will be the
destruction of Israel.” Syrian defense minister (later prime minister)
Hafez Assad said, “I, as a military man, believe that the time has come
to enter into a battle of annihilation.” Iraqi president Abdur Rahman
Aref said, “The existence of Israel is an error which must be rectified.
This is our opportunity to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us
since 1948. Our goal is clear—to wipe Israel off the map.”

Israelis secretly dug
10,000 graves for the expected victims of the war. Some 14,000 hospital
beds were prepared. Gas masks were handed out to the population.
Survivors of the European Holocaust in particular were gripped with
fear.

The rest, of course, is history; instead of being annihilated, Israel
won the war and conquered the places in question, as well as the Sinai
Peninsula and Gaza.

By now, Israel has handed the Sinai back to Egypt in a peace treaty,
unilaterally evacuated Gaza, and striven in vain for 20 years to reach a
deal with the Palestinians over the West Bank.

As for the Golan, there too attempts were made to hand it or parts of it back to Syria in return for peace undertakings.

These days, with the Syrian civil war raging and both Syrian-army and
jihadist forces lobbing mortars into the Golan daily, even left-wing
Israelis recognize that ceding the Golan would have meant these forces
would now be thronging the Sea of Galilee.

But for the EU, the fact that the Six-Day War was one of survival,
that Israel conquered areas from which it was attacked, that
considerable parts of these areas are of great security and/or
religious-historical significance to Israel, and that Israel
nevertheless accepted the principle of trading back parts of them for
peace commitments, has no bearing: all of official Europe, right and
left, conservative and socialist, has always defamed all post-1967 Jewish life in any of those places as “illegal.”

This new directive concretizes that notion in ways that Israelis of
both the right and left—and, yes, Palestinians too—expect to be harmful.

Housing Minister Uri Ariel of the right-of-center Habayit Hayehudi party rightly remarked
that this placing of 700,000 Jews beyond the pale “recalls boycotts
against the Jews in Europe more than 66 years ago.” Science and
Technology Minister Yaakov Peri, a dove and fervent advocate of a
Palestinian state in the West Bank, said the directive “potentially
means that 40 percent of research and development grants to Israel will
be affected.”

And while the public Palestinian Authority response to the directive was laudatory, a “senior Palestinian Authority official” told Israel’s largest daily Israel Hayom that

“For our part, we approached a number of [European]
Union officials, in the [Palestinian] Authority and also in Israel, to
try and prevent the decision or at least to keep it unofficial…. It’s
not just Israeli companies that are going to be hit economically, it’s
also going to be disastrous economically and socially for the
Palestinian community.”According to the Palestinian official, the European move will
freeze joint projects, force employers to stop hiring Palestinians to
work on joint projects with Israelis and lead to widespread layoffs of
Palestinians laborers working in Judea and Samaria industrial zones.

Those who put hope in Secretary of State John Kerry’s current peace initiative also believe the EU directive will severely damage it by causing the Palestinian side to further harden its positions.

Some Israeli officials believe the directive may only have been
issued by mid-level EU bureaucrats. But if published in the EU’s
official gazette by Friday, it will take effect and be almost impossible
to rescind.

The Times of Israelreported
Wednesday evening that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was on the
phone to high-level European leaders to try and alert them to the
dangers and get them to delay the measure.

But even if his efforts succeed, the directive can be taken as a
warning that Europe—always perfidious toward Israel—stands to get even
more so as its Muslim populations grow and the continent’s politicians
and bureaucrats scramble more and more to appease them.

P. David HornikSource: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/davidhornik/europes-new-untermenschen-boycott/Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

2 comments:

These 700,000 are Jews who are the owners of the political or national rights to the area in which they live. They have the exclusive right under International Law to self government in that area. www.think-Israel.org/brand.allegedoccupation.html

They have occupied it since 1967 when it was liberated from the illegal occupation by Jordan. I have occupied my home since 1964. Nothing immoral about that. I own it. The Jewish occupation of Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem is no more immoral than my occupation of a home I own.