Tuesday, 13 December 2016

Racial Diversity is Bullshit!

I did a
Google search for “racial diversity is bullshit” and I didn’t find
anything. I found “diversity sucks” but I didn’t find “racial diversity is bullshit” so I’m writing this
blog post to fill that void. Why? Because of “hate” G-d-dammit and there’s not
enough of it on the internet! And because
I’m an ass like that, that’s why! And because
racial diversity really is bullshit!

So where do
I get off saying that?

Well, I
live in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It’s
Canada’s largest city and presently the fourth largest city in North America. It’s a clean, relatively crime
free city given its size but aside from that it doesn’t have much else going for it. This is why it has to brag about
being the most diverse, cosmopolitan city in the world as if that’s an
accomplishment worth bragging about. When
you’re the largest city in what is essentially a safety school country for
immigrants wanting to settle in the West attracting a numerous and diverse
group of people from mostly underdeveloped, shit-tier countries is about as
easy as getting Justin Trudeau to stop and pose for the camera. That’s like the brightest patio light bragging about how bright it is because it attracts the most numerous
and most diverse group of insects. (Sure
you’re the brightest patio light but you got all these damn bugs around you
diminishing your brilliance.) So it
should come as no surprise to learn that Toronto, with over 200 years of white
settlement behind it, has become a white minority city within a single
generation. With having over 50% of its population being non-white and I myself having lived in Toronto for as long as
I have I think that makes me well qualified to say racial diversity is
bullshit.

Think about
it. What’s so great about racial
diversity besides satisfying some sort of xenophilic fetish or to virtue
signal to the world how your country is not racist and by implication neither
are you? It’s not as if the amount of melanin
or lack thereof in one’s skin endows an individual with some set of special
skills, talents, or knowledge unavailable to anyone else even through
education, experimentation, and hard work.

Not good
enough? How about the observation that
non-whites in white majority countries think racial diversity is bullshit
too? Since actions speak louder than
words settlement patterns in our major cities infer this. Non-whites will vocally express the wonderful
benefits racial diversity brings to white majority societies (benefits only
white majority countries are in need of apparently and not non-white ones) and
then retreat to one of their ethnic enclaves revealing a preference to live among their own. It appears they have
little interest in racial diversity in their ethnic ghettos but think it’s a
great thing for the wider white society.
Why this is so, I think, is because most non-whites immigrate to the West for economic reasons and not to participate in some grand multicultural program
to “enrich” western nations. Therefore
an expression by whites to maintain the white majority composition of their
respective countries would frustrate those ambitions. So it’s best to tell them that non-whites in
their midst is a good thing and they should accept it even to the point where
they become an insignificant demographic minority in their own countries. It’s the racial colonization of white
societies and they’re completely fine with that because colonization is
wonderful as long as you’re the one doing it.

Even the
progressive left thinks racial diversity is bullshit. Given the left’s propensity for cognitive
dissonance they preach the joys of racial diversity out of one side of
their mouth while celebrating miscegenation out of the other where in the case
of the latter were it allowed to run its full course it would extinguish racial diversity altogether. Since race-mixing
it the ultimate expression for the left that we live in a post-racial world the
elimination of racial diversity through miscegenation is the logical endgame. This is because they know, if not consciously then subconsciously, that
racial diversity is bullshit since all it does is create problems, problems
they acknowledge but won’t admit to. And if they do admit to racial diversity’s problems it’s always whitey’s
fault who, for some, needs to be bred out of existence. I guess getting rid of whitey, in fact any kind of racial diversity, is the only way a leftist's imaginings of a post-racial Utopia can be realized.

So what has
racial diversity wrought? No benefits
outside the superficial while creating problems where none existed before
through the creation of social tensions and unnecessary, wasteful distractions
in the economic and political realms. This
can be seen in the now very commonplace complaint that there’s too many of X in
position Y suggesting that it’s a problem where the placement of Z in position
Y is the solution. However, the problem
isn’t that there’s too many of X in position Y it’s that there’s too many of Z
making it into a problem. Remove Z from
the equation and there’s no problem. Or
just don’t introduce Z into the equation at all.

But that’s
what we’ve done. We’ve introduced Z and
created a problem where none existed before (and as if we don’t have enough
problems already). Government being “too white” wasn’t a problem until we allowed too many non-whites to settle in the
country and make into a problem. The
lack of racial diversity in the workforce wasn’t a problem until we allowed
non-whites to settle in our society in large numbers and make it into a problem. Now we waste valuable resources on enforcing racial
diversity policies condemning us to settle for second place at best since
racial diversity doesn’t guarantee quality and competency. If racial diversity created the best outcome
it can be best explained as a happy accident.

Racial
diversity distracts us from addressing the real roots of social inequality
which is found in our class based society.
It’s not white privilege you morons, it’s class privilege and many benefit from
our class based society and have no wish to change it. This is especially true for the 1%. Parachuting some POC into some position of influence and promoting them beyond their competency gives the illusion of
social progress while maintaining the class power structure. Meanwhile the lower classes fight among
themselves over the scraps of food the upper class lets fall to the floor from
their dinner table where non-whites promote preferences for their particular
skin type to give them an advantage. It’s
the old “divide and conquer” strategy to keep the unruly rabble from realizing
they have the power and rebelling. Without
the distractions and diluting effects of racial diversity solidarity of the lower classes would be easier to obtain.

What’s most
bothersome about racial diversity is that it implies that a racially homogeneous
host society is inherently deficient due to its racially homogeneous character
and only the introduction of those racially unlike those of the host majority
can make that society whole and function at its greatest potential. It’s suggesting that white majority societies
are lacking some kind of vital nutrient needed for growth and survival that
only non-whites can deliver. This is
insulting! It’s saying that a child who
grew up in a small white majority community in the boonies had a lesser
childhood than one who grew up in a racially diverse “vibrant” community of the
big city. Bullshit!

What’s
patronizing is how the “enrichment” non-whites bring to white majority
societies is understood to be not reciprocal.
Like the “magic negro” of film non-whites exist in white societies to
help whites grow into a more enlightened, civilized people while non-whites are
not expected to change at all.
Non-whites are perfect in their natural state and in no need of the
“enrichment” they bring to whites or to each other. Since whites are lacking how are they to
benefit from non-whites if non-whites are lacking as well? It is therefore understood that whites are enriched
by non-whites but non-whites are not enriched by whites because they don’t need
to be and how can they be if whites are deficient and they’re not? It’s patronizing for whites, in a state of
smug self-awareness, to humbly admit they’re flawed and need to be perfected
through the magical qualities they ascribe to non-white skin. It’s racist and it’s all bullshit!

It’s now
2016, soon to be 2017 (and always “current year”) and the white West is as
racially diverse as it’s ever been and what does it have to show for it? When it was mostly racially homogeneous it was
exploring the solar system, breaking the sound barrier, developing the
internet, creating modern telecommunications; challenging itself through
philosophy, art, and sport; setting global standards in pop culture and
fashion. Today we have safe spaces,
trigger warnings, cultural appropriation, anti-white racism masked as social
justice, economies more dependent on financial trickery than on the production
of real wealth, and where the greatest technological advances we made of late can
be summed up in an inane, overvalued, internet data-mining, productivity
killing company called Facebook. It
appears the more racially diverse the West has become the more mediocre it’s
become but mediocrity is a predictable outcome when diversity is an aspirant
quality, especially racial diversity which, in my lived experience, is
bullshit.