This pilot study is being conducted as a prelude to a randomized trial to compare levodopa/carbidopa plus patching versus patching alone. The purpose of the pilot study is to demonstrate recruitment potential, to provide prospective data on the tolerability of levodopa as a treatment for amblyopia, to provide limited data on its safety, to provide limited data on it's efficiency, and to provide data to assist in selecting a dose to use in a subsequent phase 3 randomized trial. In addition, this study will provide the opportunity for investigators to gain experience in using levodopa prior to a randomized trial.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 being the best. Letter scores are presented as Snellen Equivalents for presentation (i.e. 20/20 includes those with letter scores between 83 and 87 letters, 20/25 includes those with letter scores between 78 to 82 letters, etc.).

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 being the best.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. Letter scores are presented as Snellen Equivalents for presentation (i.e. 20/20 includes those with letter scores between 83 and 87 letters, 20/25 includes those with letter scores between 78 to 82 letters, etc.).

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. Letter scores are presented as Snellen Equivalents for presentation (i.e. 20/20 includes those with letter scores between 83 and 87 letters, 20/25 includes those with letter scores between 78 to 82 letters, etc.).

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.

Visual acuity was measured with the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (E-ETDRS) method and resulted in a letter score that could range from 0 to 97 letters, with 0 being the worst and 97 the best. A difference was calculated as the difference in letters between baseline and outcome with positive difference indicating improvement in acuity.

Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in both children and young and middle-aged adults. Both patching and atropine are accepted treatment modalities for the management of moderate amblyopia in children. Despite best efforts with conventional amblyopia treatment, many older children and teenagers with amblyopia fail to achieve normal visual acuity in the amblyopic eye. In a previous PEDIG study (ATS3) where children 7 to 13 years old were treated with atropine and patching, only 36% of the children with moderate amblyopia and only 23% of the children with severe amblyopia achieved 20/40 or better acuity.

No improvement in best-corrected amblyopic eye visual acuity between two consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart using the same testing method and optimal spectacle correction (if needed), with no improvement of more than 4 letters or one logMAR line.

Exclusion Criteria:

Myopia more than -6.00 D (spherical equivalent) in either eye.

Current vision therapy or orthoptics

Ocular cause for reduced visual acuity

• nystagmus per se does not exclude the subject if the above visual acuity criteria are met

Prior intraocular or refractive surgery

History of narrow-angle glaucoma

Strabismus surgery planned within 16 weeks

Known allergy to levodopa-carbidopa

History of dystonic reactions

Current requirement to take oral iron supplements including multivitamins containing iron during the 8 weeks of treatment with levodopa-carbidopa

Current use of medication for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Known gastrointestinal or liver disease

History of melanoma

Known psychological problems

Known skin reactions to patch or bandage adhesives

Prior levodopa treatment

Current treatment with topical atropine

Females who are pregnant, lactating, or intending to become pregnant within the next 16 weeks.

A negative urine pregnancy test will be required for all females who have experienced menarche.

Requirements regarding the establishment of pregnancy and monitoring of pregnancy over the course of the study as defined by each individual Institutional Review Board may supersede these criteria.

Contacts and Locations

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below.
For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00789672