Available Case Documents

MEMORANDUM OPINION - The Court will affirm the denial of benefits and will deny all pending motions. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)

ORDER - Plaintiff's objection to the scheduling order is denied. Plaintiff shall have until November 1, 2013, to file his brief in support of his position. Defendant shall have until December 2, 2013, to file a brief in response thereto. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)

ORDER denying as moot 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. Inasmuch as the summonses in question have been returned executed, the Court finds that the motion should be denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Commissioner's motion to dismiss (Filing No. 5 ) is denied without prejudice. Mr. Brown's objections (Filing Nos. 7 , 8 , 10 , and 12 ) are denied. Mr. Browns motion to enter (Filing No. 11) is denied as moot. Since the Commissioner has conceded that the Social Security Administration has been properly served (Filing No. 9 , at 1), no further proof of service of process will be required as to the agency only. Mr. Brown will provide to the Court proof of service of process upon the United States (the United States Attorney for the District of Nebraska and the Attorney General of the United States) by following the four-step procedure delineated above, on or before August 1, 2013. Thereafter, the clerk of the court is ordered to set the answer deadline for the Commissioner. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (AOA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.