I've long thought that more can be achieved through greater cross-pollenation between discipline domains, that people should specialise in a little more than one area, that we should explore the possibilities of mixing techniques together in creative and interesting ways, and do it through the play that using highly interactive tools and flexible, modular architecture allows.

Monday, 20 June 2016

What is project "Apparance"?

Videogames

I have been making videogames for over twenty years, and the process always seems to go something like this:

Design game

Create assets

Write code

Test game

Repeat above in various combinations until done (ship or bust)

These steps are quite separate, mostly performed by different people (or groups of people), and the bigger the game the more of all this you need.

Some time ago I came to the conclusion that above a certain project size this model isn't very efficient for a variety of reasons. Firstly, because assets need to be worked on by multiple people, the friction associated with moving them around (conversion, source control, management, communication, builds, deployment, and loading) can mean lots of additional effort and add up to long and frustrating iteration times. Secondly, as projects have become more ambitious, with larger scopes and game-play areas where the work involved in creating them increases exponentially (with area/volume), the cost also ramps up this way because the work a team puts in can only, at best, grow linearly with size. In addition to this, a natural consequence of growing teams is the need for increasing communication, management, and support. All of these pressures usually mean compromises being made to the game's detail, richness, variety, polish, quality, or seemingly low priority support work is neglected, in order to get it to fit within the budget.

Pondering this problem for several years I have formed a vision of how I think we can improve this construction and authoring process, and what the technology and tools it requires would look like. I'm fed up with conventional approaches, the waste, the sluggish pace, the repetition, the tighter squeeze on the more fuzzy aspects of creativity like experimentation, play, fun, emergence, and instinct. I want to try working a different way, using novel and interesting techniques, powerful technology and tools, to empower smaller teams to create bigger things. I believe we can do better, and whilst it won't be everyone's cup of tea, it's something I believe passionately in.

"I'm fed up with conventional approaches, the waste, the sluggish pace, the repetition, the tighter squeeze on the more fuzzy aspects of creativity like experimentation, play, fun, emergence, and instinct."

I've been working on this project in my spare time for around five years, with the original concept rolling around my brain for about five years before that. As I described in my previous post I am now in the fortunate position to be able to invest all my time in this project. So, what exactly is it I am proposing?

Vision

I want to enable rapid creation of rich and varied worlds through fully dynamic procedural generation. I want to encourage play and exploration through fully interactive live editing of content and behaviours. I want to make games in creative and exciting ways:

Rich worlds full of the variety that parameterisation and procedural techniques can enable.

Increasing the efficiency of creating content through asset modularity and easy reuse.

Making extensive use of visual editing paradigms (data-flow, node-graph).

Removing hard coded content, everything data driven.

Small footprint applications yet with all the richness of today's larger titles.

There is nothing out there that does all this, the technology just don't exist. I see this project as an adventure where we are specialising in procedural generation and real-time interactive experiences that can be applied to a variety of applications; especially games, education, and interactive visualisations. If we aspire to travel to new lands but the vehicles to do so do not exist, we must first build them.

"If we aspire to travel to new lands but the vehicles to do so do not exist, we must first build them."

What it is

This is an authoring environment in which to create your worlds, populate them, and bring them to life. The real-time synthesis engine uses procedural definitions, their input parameters, and the surrounding environment to dynamically fill out the world in more and more detail as you explore.

Apparance Editor - Procedure graph for roof section of an old house

The editor provides authoring and testing of the world through a visual flow based editing model (nodes and wires) to create the procedure definitions describing the geometry, texturing, effects, physics, behaviour, logic, and much, much more.

A standalone player application provides a non-editable view of world, for test, play, and release.
The underlying engine contains the technology driving both editor and game, using highly concurrent operation, with dynamic detail management, largely stateless data-flow control and AI systems, and all with live editing/monitoring during authoring and play.

What it is not

It is not a silver bullet and won't solve everyone's problems; Some games won't fit the development model and technology being created here. It may be that a game relies heavily on areas that are a particular weakness for this technology. Some games are based on very tightly controlled and designed environments and behaviours. But I believe that working toward its strengths and away from its weaknesses is no different to any existing games development, more so historically as hardware and software capabilities have applied their own unique constraints on possibility.

I don't see it as a plugin for other engines; using a lot of unique techniques to achieve its aims means it may not work well in more conventional engine scene graphs and rendering. The lack of scalability in many existing systems can cause problems too as non-scaling systems 'crowd-out' the scalable ones as a project grows. This is a disruptive technology, and relies a lot on the interaction between the various novel techniques at play.

It is not finished yet. This is a project that I've been working on in my spare time, and whilst showing great promise already, there is still a lot to do to. I see many stages to its development and I will be building demonstrations and even games to show-case it at various points in the future.

Direction

This is an ongoing project and I want to involve people as it develops. Through blogging and sharing the results of my work I hope to involve like-minded and creative people to help shape the tech and tools into something that many developers could benefit from. I am working towards releasing versions of the tools for you all to play with to see what we can create together. If you are interested in these ideas and the prospect of trying something different please get in touch via email, via my Twitter feed, or just follow progress here on my blog.

The Name

Logo design idea - featuring one of the first models built with the system.

Apparance (or often Apparence) refers to the outward manifestation of a person or thing,
the act of being visible, what others see, the process of creating this
external impression. The original inspiration for this comes from "Against A Dark Background" by Iain M Banks; The Solipsists don't subscribe to the concept of the individual with no use of the word 'me', referring to, and in a way justifying, the existence of other members of their group as 'apparences'.

Next

Next time I will bring you a full project status report, showing the current state of play and what I'm working towards at the moment. It should be a very visual post as there is lots to see.

Coming from a technical and practical upbringing I've always been passionate about computers and electronics; writing programs and building contraptions from primary school age upwards. Studied electronics at university, and working in games development since 1995.