Wednesday, February 24, 2010

The story below is very disturbing. Government Accountability Office (GAO) officials were able to easily penetrate our borders with false identification. Not only did they conclude that terrorists could pass through relatively easily, they also concluded that radioactive material could be smuggled across the Canadian-US border in multiple places!

Radioactive material was brought into the U.S. by covert agents "In three states, the proximity of the road to the border allowed investigators to cross undetected, successfully simulating the cross-border movement of radioactive materials or other contraband into the United States from Canada." – Said the ‘Covert Operations Report’

In the past, officials from the Government Accountability Office testified before members of the US. Congress on three separate occasions in order to describe security vulnerabilities that terrorists could exploit to enter the country. Yet, even with reports of border security deficiencies, President Barack Obama cut the number of Border Patrol agents. Does he want another attack against the US? Read the article and then decide.

According to a report obtained by the Terrorism Committee of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, the GAO's first two testimonies focused on covert testing at ports of entry -- the air, sea, and land locations where international travelers can legally enter the United States.

In its third testimony, the GAO focused on limited security assessments of unmanned and unmonitored border areas between land ports of entry.

GAO officials were asked to summarize the results of covert testing and assessment work for these three testimonies. This report discusses the results of testing at land, sea, and air ports of entry; however, the majority of GAO's work was focused on land ports of entry. The unmanned and unmonitored border areas GAO assessed were defined as locations where the government does not maintain a manned presence 24 hours per day or where there was no apparent monitoring equipment in place.

GAO investigators identified numerous border security vulnerabilities, both at ports of entry and at unmanned and unmonitored land border locations between the ports of entry. In testing ports of entry, undercover investigators carried counterfeit drivers' licenses, birth certificates, employee identification cards, and other documents, presented themselves at ports of entry and sought admittance to the United States dozens of times.

They arrived in rental cars, on foot, by boat, and by airplane. They attempted to enter in four states on the northern border (Washington, New York, Michigan, and Idaho), three states on the southern border (California, Arizona, and Texas), and two other states requiring international air travel (Florida and Virginia).

In nearly every case, government inspectors accepted oral assertions and counterfeit identification provided by GAO undercover investigators as proof of U.S. citizenship and allowed them to enter the country. In total, undercover investigators made 42 crossings with a 93 percent success rate. On several occasions, while entering by foot from Mexico and by boat from Canada, covert investigators were not even asked to show identification.

For example, at one border crossing in Texas, an undercover investigator attempted to show a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer his counterfeit driver's license, but the officer said, "That's fine, you can go" without looking at it.

As a result of these tests, GAO concluded that terrorists could use counterfeit identification to pass through most of the tested ports of entry with little chance of being detected.

In its most recent work, GAO shifted its focus from ports of entry and primarily performed limited security assessments of unmanned and unmonitored areas between ports of entry. The names of the states GAO visited for this limited security assessment have been withheld at the request of Customs and Border Protection officials.

In four states along the U.S.-Canada border, GAO covert investigators found state roads that were very close to the border that CBP did not appear to monitor. In three states, the proximity of the road to the border allowed investigators to cross undetected, successfully simulating the cross-border movement of radioactive materials or other contraband into the United States from Canada.

For example, in one apparently unmanned, unmonitored area on the northern border, the U.S. Border Patrol was alerted to GAO's activities through the tip of an alert citizen. However, the responding U.S. Border Patrol agents were not able to locate the investigators and their simulated contraband.

Also on the northern border, GAO investigators located several ports of entry in one state that had posted daytime hours and were unmanned overnight. Investigators observed that surveillance equipment was in operation, but that the only preventive measure to stop an individual from crossing the border into the United States was a barrier across the road that could be driven around.

GAO officials also identified potential security vulnerabilities on federally managed lands adjacent to the U.S.-Mexico border. GAO concluded that CBP faces significant challenges on the northern border, and that a determined cross-border violator would likely be able to bring radioactive materials or other contraband undetected into the United States by crossing the U.S.-Canada border at any of the assessed locations.

The unanswered question of course is… could terrorists get radio active material into Canada? It has already been determined by US Customs Department that R.A.M. could be smuggled into Mexico. When pressed for an answer from the GAO they admitted that yes, Radio Active Material could be smuggled into Canada, if by no other way, then through the northern territories.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Awhile back I wrote an article about how WMD and or a dirty bombs could be smuggled through the tunnels between Mexico and the US. Many of these tunnels are believed to still exist. Now we know that the northern border and even Florida and Virginia are vulnerable. I other words, Americas borders are like a sieve.

All this information is available to Obama. And yet nothing is done to protect our borders, on the contrary Obama knows this vulnerability, and still has reduced the protection of our borders at a time when we are at war wit Islam. Oh! I forgot he says that we are not at war with Islam. I feel better already!

At the beginning of this article, I asked; could this Muslim president be welcoming another attack on the US by Muslim terrorists? Oh! You don’t believe that Barrack Hussein Obammah is a Muslim sleeper terrorist at a time that we are at war with Islamic terrorists. Well then you really need to watch this video and listen to him in his own words tell you “this is no longer a Christian country this is a Muslim country” and he is a Muslim, and he believes the “Holy Quran” and the Muslim ideology.

After watching the video, then ask yourself the question, is Obama purposely making this country vulnerable to terrorists attack? And could that purpose be to advance the cause and agenda of Obama’s Nation of Islam?

Having an admitted Muslim as President at a time that ‘we are at war with Islam’ (denied by Obama) is tantamount to having an admitted Nazi as President at a time that we were at war with Nazi Germany (and have him deny that we were at war with Germany) 1943, I think it was… I hope you can see the parallel.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Recently the scandal surrounding the Global Warming religion/cult was inadvertently exposed by someone hacking a computer server. But I wonder if it will really change the direction of all of its programmed robotic followers.

By de Andréa

When a lie becomes the truthNot unlike Darwinism, the theory of chance became truth; it took on a life of its own. The lie became truth even as time and science progressed, much of the fundamental so-called facts were found to be either mistakes, based on omissions or outright fabrications. Even so, today one would be hard pressed to convince the indoctrinated student of science that Darwinism is just a theory and is based on a junk scientific foundation of proof, because for him --- Well… it just has always been, and besides it is in our science text books.

The Global Warming Lie exposedIt gives one cause to wonder if the same damage to good ole fashion science and truth will be the result of the Global warming fraud that exploded in November of 2009 when a folder containing documents, data and, e-mails purportedly "hacked" from Britain's Climate Research Unit (CRU) turned out to be the smoking-gun, proof of a worldwide conspiracy of one lie built upon another to exaggerate the existence, causation, and threat of global warming . .

Included in the cash of documents was a list of apparent conspirators including many of the worlds leading climate alarmists -- the very scientists on whose work the entire phony anthropogenic global warming theory is based. Will then, (as in the case of Darwin,) the truth now becomes a lie?

What is our indoctrinational school system going to do now that a generation and a half of heads full of mush has been robotically programmed to fear the future, because camels break wind and people breath and exhaust pipes spew out Co 2, the oceans are going to drowned them and life will be like living in Oman in the summertime. They continue to teach the lie, that’s what they do.

One would think that this scandal would be on every front page in the world! But alas most people haven’t even heard about it or more importantly they don’t believe it. (the truth then--- becomes a lie)

Why is it so easy for people to believe Henny Penny when she says the sky is falling, even if it obviously isn’t so. Even when the fraudulent chicken is exposed, people think ‘that’s’ a lie, and still look up, and watch for the falling sky?

Good question. I thought you’d never ask. The lie becomes the truth because Henny said the sky is falling and Dr Henny Penny is not just any ordinary chicken. She has a PHD in Sky Structural Engendering. (No! That’s correct it’s engendering) I mean, who is going to argue with that.

Dr. Penny engendered the whole idea of a falling sky, complete with graphs and phony documents. Who knew? The rest of the Sky chickens built an entire religion on the foundation of Dr. Penny’s fraudulent findings, including one infamous rooster who knew nothing about the sky but was the vice rooster of the coup at one time. He made a movie about the falling sky based on Dr. Penny’s phony research and made all the chicks and roosteretts at egg laying school and their parents watch it.

Well… in the case of Global warming of course it wasn’t a chicken, it was Director Philip Jones of the CRU Britain’s Climate Research Unit, And Al Gore the ex Vice Rooster, but it’s the same scenario.

Indoctrinational programmingTo continue with the answer to the question, why do people want to believe a lie? Well, people really don’t want to believe a lie, but we have become so programmed to accept the swill our government indoctrinational institutions vomit out, not to mention the good ole lying alphabet soup media, that it is difficult to know just what to believe. The real serious problem here, is there are those that have grown up with the indoctrinational programming of the Global Warming lie. Mainly those that have been exposed to this as children. How does ‘one’ deprogram a child, erase a child’s brain.

It is a sad situation for a parent to find themselves in because now not only must the child be deprogrammed (have their hard drives wiped or deleted of the lies their teachers so willingly and blindly taught them), but they now must be taught not to trust their teachers.

Why do teachers lie to their students?I don’t think that most teachers would intentionally teach their students a lie. So why do they do it? Because they themselves have been programmed and indoctrinated, if not through their own so-called education then by the media, by the government, or in some cases by the politically correct school districts under threat of losing their jobs.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One should debrief and deprogram their children every day when they come home from school. The only other alternative is to home school.

We live now in a country where truth is irrelevant and hysteria and political correctness prevail.

So why would someone create such a hysterical fantasy as Global Warming? I really don’t believe anyone created it; instead I believe it grew out of the basic conservation programs, born out of the necessity just to clean up our local environmental waste. Any industry has product waste. And in many cases it can be baffling as to what to do with it. In some cases it was just dumped somewhere in a river or buried, coming back to haunt us years later.

There was also the conservation of raw materials and protection of over hunted animals which brought recycling and “Save The Whales” bumper stickers.

Hysterical IgnoranceAs conservation progressed unabated, it turned into the religious nightmare of Voodoo “Environmentalism” The development of the modern model of the Ecosystem. I have no issue with conservation, ecology or the study of the environment. But when it gets out of control it begins to control society. The ignorant hysteria of running out of natural resources such as trees, (by the way we have more standing timber in America now than when the Mayflower landed on Plymouth Rock). Or the hysteria of a species going extinct, more species have gone extinct in the past 6000 years than even exist now on the planet, and we discover new species every day.

This hysteria evolved into the man caused destruction of the planet. Moreover, soon humanity was not even considered part of the ecological equation. Humanity was the enemy. And our very existence was destroying the earth. This was the birth of Global Warming. If a part of science didn’t fit the model then it was discarded. If the hysteria needed a boost, science was fabricated. Besides, there is a lot of money and power in this new religion. A whole new book of restrictive laws were passed and whole industries have been born out of this new religion. We may have lost our freedom but the world is green.

The thing of it is; this big beautiful ball has always been blue…And in some cases red and white too.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

The Confiscation of your independent retirement funds, in trade for ‘Government Annuities’ are Being Promoted by the Obama regime

By de Andréa

Good bye Capitalistic Republic, hello Socialistic TyrannyThe new Social Communist Government of the United States wants your money, all 3.6 trillion of it. It doesn’t need it, it just wants it. The Government can borrow or just print all the money it needs as they have been doing. This is just part of the continuing Obama socialistic scheme to put you on the road to total dependence. The Communist liberal Socialists can’t stand the idea that even though they have all but destroyed your independent capitalistic economy you still cling to your independent personal capital investments. In other words you still continue to cling to the old outdated philosophy of freedom of choice, Americanism and independence. Shame on you!!! No! Shame on Congress and the Supreme Court for allowing this poor excuse for an American President to trash our Constitutional Republic.

We are in deep troubleThe government is now looking at ways to promote this mandatory conversion or confiscation of your 401(k)s and IRAs into the Federal Treasury, in exchange for a Government guaranteed steady income stream. Something like Social Security does now…until the money runs out anyway, then, they’ll find something else to steal from you.

The U.S. Treasury and Labor Departments will ask for public comment as soon as next week on ways to promote the confiscation of 401(k) savings and Individual Retirement Accounts into annuities or other steady payment streams, according to Assistant Labor Secretary Phyllis C. Borzi and Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Mark Iwry, who are spearheading the effort.

In other words Obama wants to socialize your personal retirement investment savings. This would generally mean that the treasury Dept. would confiscate your 401k and Ira’s and put them into the failing Social Security system in order to bail out the already bankrupt fund.

The ammunition supporting the propaganda being used to promote this Social Communist pillaging of the rest of your hard earned money is that the average personal 401(k) fund balance dropped 31 percent from $69,200 at the end of 2007 to $47,500 at the end of March 2009, according to a Fidelity Investments review of 11 million accounts it manages. The Standard & Poors 500 Index tumbled 46 percent in that period. The average balance of the Fidelity accounts recovered to $60,700 as of last Sept. 30 as the stock market rebounded. This is of course to show that capital investments don’t work. Try telling that to Warren Buffett.

In addition to annuities, the inquiry will cover other approaches to guaranteeing income, including longevity insurance that would provide an income stream for retirees living beyond a certain age, she said.

"There's been a fair amount of discussion in the literature taking the view that perhaps there ought to be more lifetime income. The question is how to encourage it, and whether the government can and should be helpful in that regard," said Iwry said in an interview, to a senior adviser to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This Government has become the enemy of America…There isn’t a word --- to describe my anger at this administration for the destruction that they are wielding on my country. It isn’t enough that the Government has changed itself from a Federalist State to a National State, doing an end run around the Constitution. And then nationalizing the banking system, and nationalizing the counties largest corporations, but now, they want to make it against the law to even make your own investments and take care of your own well being and retirement. If this isn’t definitive Tyrannical Communist Socialism, then the definition needs to be redefined.

I am going to be honest…if I see this inevitability coming down the road; I will draw all of my retirement investment out of the market and bury it in the ground. At least the enemy won’t get it. Is there really anything else left that the government can take away from us.

Truly the American Revolutionary War was launched for less. Wasn’t it something about a tax on tea???

Well at least it was about our DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE…

Maybe we need another one, the 'Declaration' has become just a 'Decoration'.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Awhile back I wrote a piece titled Muslim Shariah Law comes to Vanderbilt University, but I want you to know that Islam is in our High schools and our primary schools as well as our colleges from New York to California.

de Andréa

Nonie Darwish an Egyptian woman brought up as a Muslim, now a Christian, risks her life every day to help to fight against the runaway train of Islam here in the United States.

She shares below the deception of Islam and an e-mail she received from a concerned parent.

I want you to understand that this is no longer the exception --- it is now the rule. Every concerned parent and grandparent should read this and take it very seriously. Because this is now “in a school near you”

And why is this happening? Because we have a Mulsim president, and if for some ignorant reason, you don't believe that, then Watch this video of our Muslim president commiting treason, aiding and abetting our enemy.

Obama says: "we are not at war with Islam". But Islam has declared war on America, just how does that work?

Remember the Muslim Television executive, Muzzammil Hassan, who decapitated his wife near Buffalo, New York? His TV station, Bridges TV, was created to promote the idea that Islam is a religion of peace and friendship. This station’s goals perfectly fit with the intense Saudi PR machine, which is spending tons of money to change the image of Islam in the West — even if it takes denials, fabrications and outright lies.

Several years ago, I debated Othman Shibly, a U.S. citizen of Syrian origin and a Sharia expert, on a Bridges TV program directed by his son, Hassan Shibly. Both bearded men are fierce apologists for Radical Islam and defend Sharia. Dr. Shibly holds a Sufi/Radical Islamist ideology and hides behind a thin veneer of “moderate” Islam, but that façade does not fool someone like myself from the same background. The Shiblys make no attempt to repudiate the claims of men like Hizbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, or other radical Islamists like Sheikh Ahmad Kuftaro, the Mufti of the Syrian Ministry of Religion under the regimes of both Hafiz and Bashar Assad and Kuftaro’s protégé, Sheikh Rajab Deeb. My interview with the two men was never aired and the Shiblys never sent me a copy of the taped interview as they promised.

That brings me to an email I recently received from a concerned American mother, who said that she was horrified at what her child is being taught by Islamic guest speakers at her child’s high school, Clarence High School in Clarence, New York. The speakers are none other than Hassan and Othman Shibly, who are now lecturing our kids on Islam at New York state public schools. That is done with the help of politically correct apologist educators...

…This is what the mother wrote to me:

“Hello Mrs. Darwish:

I need your help addressing a serious problem I’m currently trying to handle. Recently, my child came home from school and told me about a presentation his Global Studies 9 class had that was given by a man by the name of Hassan Shibly. My child was shocked and visibly shaken at home and told me about the things this man said to the class. The pretext for the presentation was for Mr. Shibly to talk to the class about Islam and dispel some of the ‘misunderstandings’ and ‘Islamophobia.’ Here are some of the things he said to these boys and girls: ‘

The September 11th attacks occurred because of America’s blind support of Israel and the men who carried out the attack were not Muslims, but atheists.’

‘Terrorism is an example of people reacting with their hearts and not their minds…if someone insulted your mother, wouldn’t you retaliate against them? Allah is more important than anything to a Muslim, and if you insult Allah, a Muslim can do anything to defend his belief.’

‘The news media lie…when a Muslim does something, they’re labeled as a Muslim while people of other religions who commit crimes are never identified by their religion.’”

She added that Hassan Shibly’s father, Othman, also came to speak at the school but to a different class. She expressed her outrage that these men were invited into a school to indoctrinate underage, impressionable minds with hate a filled ideology and a hidden agenda. She stated that she alerted the principal to a few links that show Shibly’s affiliations and added that she doesn’t think the principal is convinced. She concluded by saying that so far a decision has not been made whether to bring the Shilbys back to teach or not.

End of letter

I was speechless after reading this woman’s e-mail. That is outrageous and what is worse is that I have heard similar claims from mothers in California where I live. I wanted to tell all the concerned mothers of America to stand up against this kind of “education” and never feel helpless. We must all speak out before the indoctrination strikes America at the heart... …

Muslim propaganda is relentless in trying to misportray Islam in the eyes of the West. While mainstream mosques and Muslim leaders across the globe are shouting jihad, death to America, death to the Jews, and encouraging Muslims to take over the West, our children are told if you fear such threats you are an Islamophobe. When mainstream Muslim schools and universities teach that apostates must be killed and that jihad means “to war with non-Muslims to establish the religion” and that jihad is a permanent war institution against Jews Christians and pagans, we are told to never dare misinterpret this as encouraging violence.

Islamic education, like communism and Fascism, must control children’s minds, which is the best system to produce adults who will submit.

I am not the one who compared Islam to communism and fascism; this comparison was made by none other than the most prominent Muslim scholar of the 20th century, Sheikh Abu Ala Maududi, who stated in his book,

"Islamic Law and Constitution,” on p. 262, that the Islamic State:

“seeks to mould every aspect of life and activity…. In such a state no one can regard any field of his affairs as personal and private. Considered from this aspect the Islamic State bears a kind of resemblance to the Fascist and Communist states.” Maududi added “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam.”

I wonder if the Shiblys will condemn this popular Muslim scholar to their students or perhaps call him an atheist...

...Because of my background, I can smell and taste Muslim propaganda. It is coming to a school near you. The danger is, believe it or not, if you grow up with such propaganda, it can feel and sound normal and even holy. Intentionally or unintentionally, in the name of tolerance, we are bringing up a generation of Americans who will tolerate Islamic Jihad, in the name of cultural relativism and compassion.

Islamic tyranny, like all tyrannies, must use lies, propaganda and fabrications to justify the Muslim duty of jihadist violence to expand and conquer the world for Islam and Sharia. That is why the Arab world is having great difficulty in modifying its hate-filled educational system. Instead of changing, it is trying to change us and desensitize us to its violence.

If this is not immediately corrected, it will be one of the biggest mistakes in American history. What Mr. Shibly was teaching our kids is outright Arab propaganda justifying jihad, 9/11, retaliation as self-defense, and conspiracy theories against Israel. How monumentally foolish and dangerous it is to allow the likes of the Shiblys to have access to American high school kids.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I wanted to publish this just the way it was written by Mrs. Darwish because she was brought up and raised as a Muslim. Some times someone who has ‘been there --- done that’ can carry a bigger stick than someone like me who has only studied Islam. It is interesting however that her point of view, foresight and since of urgency is near identical to my own. This supports the theory that the truth is the truth no matter where you find it.

I am strongly suggesting if you are a parent with a child in a public or even a private school, from child care to graduate school that you keep a close eye and ear, on what is going on in their classrooms. This kind of deceptive infiltration of Muslim propaganda into our children’s minds at the earliest possible age is an absolute necessity if Islam is going to succeed in their objective of taking over America and the West.

This is why I don’t distinguish between Communism, Nazism, or Islam. The end result is all the same. The robotic programming of our children at the earliest possible age is paramount to the eventual success of any oppressive tyrannical regime.

Moreover, don’t you think for one moment that ‘it can’t happen here’! Is has already happened in Western Europe and it is already happening all over the United States, in every State, in every town and in every school in America.

Unlike the Europeans, we Americans still have a chance to challenge this demonic evil nation of Islam, but we must wake up this sleeping giant now, before it’s too late - and we wake up in another world, a world of hatred, oppression, tyranny, and death.

Remember what Nonie said:”When mainstream schools and universities teach that apostates must be killed and that jihad means “to war with non-Muslims to establish their religion” and that jihad is a permanent war institution against Jews Christians and pagans, (we are told to never dare misinterpret this as encouraging violence).

Islamic education, like communism and Fascism, must control children’s minds which is the best system to produce adults who will submit.”

Just do the math, set the numbers in motion, and follow the money down the road to economic and cultural disaster.

By de Andréa

After looking over the new Obama budget, one can clearly see the end of America. Does this mean that this country and all of its people will physically disappear? Well…not exactly. But America as we know it, will fiscally, and culturally, disappear; it will be just a dream of history.

I am sorry if that seems like doom and gloom, but it is a reality if we continue for much longer down this path, because it leads to an unforeseen slippery slope that can’t be stopped once the inertia takes over.

It leads to over $2 trillion in tax increases over the next decade and a rapid acceleration of the national debt from a staggering $7.7 trillion today, to an incomprehensible $18.57 trillion in 10 years. Government takeover of such things as health care, energy and the student loan program

But it gets much worse…

We would be better off, if for the next 10 years the government passed no new laws and sent Congress home.

Obama is trying to make the claim that he is restoring fiscal responsibility, but nothing could be further from the truth. And the closer you look, the worse and uglier the picture gets...

In the next three years alone, Obama plans on increasing government SPENDING over the current law by more than $500 BILLION and ring up real deficits of nearly $4 TRILLION!

That would mean Obama would be responsible in just four years for increasing the real debt by $5.496 TRILLION -- coming close to all the total debt accumulated under all prior presidents combined in the history of this republic.

Cooking the books

Obama has snuck the cap and trade scheme in as a "deficit neutral" item -- hiding another $853 BILLION in new taxes for what amounts to a nonexistent global warming slush fund off the official budget books in a secret draw.

And all the while, Obama continues the policies of his predecessors by raping and pillaging the so called nonexistent Social Security Trust Fund (which is now running its own deficits) to the tune of $1.4 TRILLION.

But as bad as all this sounds, one line from "Table S-4" in Obama's budget sent a chill down my spine as a thought about the future of our nation…

Interest payments on the national debt will grow from $188 BILLION in 2010, to an unsustainable $840 BILLION in 2020. That's just servicing the interest on the debt, while the total debt continues to spiral out of control. That is the slippery slope.

Time to Stop the money printing presses

America --- has in just one year of socialistic fiscal madness, reached the tipping point… that could possibly lead to the ‘End of the American Dream’, as we know it. "The borrower is the slave of the lender" is a timeless proverb that will be played out on the grandest of scales before our eyes.

When AIG went belly up who bailed them out? When GM went belly up who bailed them out? When Chrysler went belly up who bailed them out? When the U.S. Government can no longer print worthless monopoly money, who will bail them out?

Eventually, China or some other foreign power will call our ‘debt bluff’ and the only solution will be radical government policy -- hyper-inflation, hyper-taxation, and hyper-national statism. The end of freedom. The end of prosperity. The end of our culture.

As I said “The End of the American Dream”

Now and this November we must begin to overthrow this Social Communist Muslim Government. Moreover in 2012, we must elect a new leader for this once “Free Republic”, and begin the long process of the “Restoration Project”. .

Thursday, February 18, 2010

“But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things. But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken. And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And then shall He send His angels, and shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.” (Mark 13:23-27)

By de AndréaFebruary 18, 2010The discovery of the object, officially known as "P/2010 A2," is sparking some chatter concerning a possible biblical message regarding end-time scenarios, as well as other theories.

Some people see a flying cross, or perhaps a Star of David. Others say it resembles a ninja-style throwing blade or even a science-fiction spaceship from such Hollywood creations as "Star Wars," "Star Trek," "Babylon 5" or "The Last Starfighter."

Whatever it is, the Hubble Space Telescope has observed a mysterious, shaped debris pattern and trailing streamers of dust that may have been the result of a head-on collision between two asteroids. Photographed just a few weeks ago by Hubble, scientists don't think it's a comet, but they're not exactly sure of the precise origin of the incredible object soaring some 90 million miles from Earth.

"I've seen thousands of astronomical images over my career, but this is one of the few absolute jaw-droppers: A flying X-pattern with trailing streamers," said Ray Villard, a contributing writer to Discovery News. "Whatever it is, nothing quite like it has ever before been seen in the heavens."

Even the experts who study celestial phenomena seem somewhat perplexed. "We're still

trying to really figure out what it is," University of Arizona planetary scientist Jim Scotti told National Geographic. Scotti is on a team observing the object from the Kitt Peak National Observatory outside Tucson.

"The truth is, we're still struggling to understand what this means," comet expert David Jewitt at UCLA told Britain's Daily Mail. "It's most likely the result of a recent collision between two asteroids."

If it were indeed the result of such a collision, it would be the first time astronomers have gazed upon the immediate result of such a crash.

The official statement from America's space agency indicates: NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has observed a mysterious X-shaped debris pattern and trailing streamers of dust that suggest a head-on collision between two asteroids. Astronomers have long thought the asteroid belt is being ground down through collisions, but such a grand smashup has never been seen before.

Asteroid collisions are energetic, with an average impact speed of more than 11,000 miles per hour, or five times faster than a rifle bullet.

"If this interpretation is correct, two small and previously unknown asteroids recently collided, creating a shower of debris that is being swept back into a tail from the collision site by the pressure of sunlight," Jewitt said.

With the 2012 end-times theory building, this might get attention on the Internet as yet, another sign of the 'End of Times

Other on online message boards have made such statements as:

"The blind will not see! It is the hand of GOD! It's HIS handiwork revealing the cross!"

"Another great display of our creator God!"

"It is clearly God warning Bill Gates not to fund those EVIL vaccines."

"Definitely an alien ship coming out of warp drive."

"Oh it's definitely a Romulan Bird of prey

"Clearly a Cylon baseship."

"What if it's not an asteroid? Could this be the 'Blue Star' the Hopi spoke about in their prophecies?"

"It's almost a complete French 'Fleur de Lis' --- and a sign that the New Orleans Saints will win the Super Bowl.” He got that right. Well…the part about the saints winning anyway!

I suggest we start acting like ChristiansWhile intolerance is not generally one of America’s faults, Muslims across America and throughout the world regularly lecture the West about how we are not sufficiently “tolerant” of Islam.

By de Andréa

On the contrary, we Americans are far too tolerant of a people that at every turn try to change our culture into theirs, make slaves of us, and or threaten to kill us.

Benevolence and tolerance of others and their beliefs, religious or otherwise is a Judeo Christian value. The Christian West -- does not force their beliefs on non-Christians. They do not attempt to force others to accommodate their rituals, rules, or sacraments. They do not threaten to kill people for exercising their opposing beliefs. No the only religious people in the world that indicatively practice intolerance, is Islam.

Tolerance must generally be exorcised by all. Otherwise it becomes a dictatorial theocracy. Freedom doesn’t mean one is free to dominate another, or take freedom away from others in order to exercise ones own freedom. If this were not true freedom would rapidly self district.

So what would be sufficiently tolerant for Islam? If Westerners were just tolerant enough to conform to Islam’s Sharia law, bow to their every demand and dictate, or just die…that would be tolerance in the mind of Islam.

In the final analyses of Islamic intolerance, we must finally say, “I vote for “intolerance” of an intolerant hateful demonic people”.

We will lose our American culture, our freedom, our rights, ‘ALL OF THEM’, our liberty, our country our lives and our souls--- if we continue to blindly embrace this multi-cultural, politically - correct tolerance of a demonic ideology that is bent on our destruction.

So, enough said about our intolerance, what about the intolerance of Islam for the rest of the world. The “intolerance of Islam’ is blatantly on display in Saudi Arabia, where Christians cannot publicly carry a Bible and a Jew can’t wear a Star of David.

American college students who face the threat of Islam know how offensively hypocritical this is. America bends over backwards to be tolerant, so much so that “tolerance” has evolved into a corrosive political correctness which created the climate of blind military silence that led to 9/11 and the recent jihadist massacre at Ft. Hood.

An example is on display in this video, recorded at the University of California in Irvine, where Muslims and their blind sympathizers repeatedly shouted down Ambassador Michael Oren at a public event. If you want to see the ugly face of the “intolerance” of militant Islam right here in America, watch this video.

The following typifies the intolerance that exists in the Nation of Islam. This is a true story. (I am not revealing the pastor’s name or the country to protect his identity and his life.)

The pastor was invited to speak at a small home meeting, a group of about 20 people, including children. During the meeting, over 60 Muslim military police descended on this small group that the police said posed a fearsome “threat” to the peace and well-being of the country!

The truth is that it is a fearsome threat to Islam, not the peace and well-being of the country.The pastor’s Bible and personal effects were confiscated. Fortunately for him, his punishment was deportation. It could have been much, much worse. Christians have been killed for less.

The militant intolerance of Islam that dominates the Muslim world is not a relic of some ancient past. It is their religion, and the reality of every nation where Muslims enjoy either a small majority or a substantial minority of the population. Even countries characterized as more tolerant, such as Turkey, are rife with examples of this Muslim intolerance.

This Islamic intolerance has taken root in America and it is not going away unless we make it go away. The UC/Irvine video is not an isolated case. Perhaps you recall the protestors in Dec 2008, and again in Jan of 2009, shouting at Jews on the streets of Florida “go back to the ovens” and “die, die, die!” Watch Video

We must win the war against Islamic terrorism in the Middle East. But we must also win this war right here in America, for the preservation of America’s values of freedom and our cherished right of free speech.

As Lee Harris notes in his book The Suicide of Reason, for the tolerance of evil is not tolerance, moreover, the tolerance of militant Islam’s intolerance, is cultural suicide.

I vote that we intolerantly deport Islam right out of America the same way this Christian pastor was intolerated right out of his African Muslim country.

The golden rule works only with an independent thinking people, for the purpose of showing an example of love benevolence and understanding. Here in lies the stickity wicket, the word love, benevolence or charity, does not exists in Islam. It was part of the ancient Arabic language but since the year 610 AD when the hateful demonic religion of Islam entered the Middle East, real love is not even understood by Islam, it is instead regarded as a sign of weakness and is therefore scorned.

On a personal note

Some people are going to want to call me racist, and un-Christian. I have paid a price for my stand on Islam. I have lost the respect of a large part of my own family because of my opinion about Islam. Even so, I rarely defend my position or make excuses for my beliefs, but this time in my own defense please understand that Islam is not a race of people it is a demonic ideology.

Christianity teaches us to love one another even the unlovable. But it does not teach us to love a demonic ideology or subject ourselves to it. It teaches us to get as far away from it as possible.

I suggest we start acting like Christians and wake up to what the Spirit of God is saying to the churches.

One should not try to pick out the injustice in his brother’s eye until he has first removed the ignorance from his own eye.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

According to Cass Sunstein Obama’s new Regulatory Czar, People who believe in the U.S. Constitution should be regarded as enemies of the State

By de Andréa

In a belief shared by many left wing liberal Socialist Democrats including Janet Napolitano head of Homeland Security --- Cass Sunstein another Obama Czar has come under fire recently for suggesting that it would be a good idea to deploy federal agents to "cognitively infiltrate" ‘Right wing’ political groups that he says believe in Constitutional conspiracy theories. "Cognitive infiltration" is just a fancy way to describe downright Orwellian implications, summoning visions of disinformation campaigns, and agent’s provocateurs.

Cass Sunstein, is a long-time University of Chicago law professor (he has since moved on to (HSII) Harvard Socialist Indoctrinational Institution), and is currently serving as director/Czar of the United States Office of (subversive) Information and (subversive) Regulatory Affairs. (Emphasis and sarcasm is of course is mine)

So, if you believe that Socialist - Democrats or Muslim - Obama want a socialist or fascist state, so the government can infiltrate, with spies, into your organization then you are a constitutional conspiracy nut, and Obama's people want to listen in on all your cell phone conversations. No privacy in America is the Obama creed. See story here.

In that case, the Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because he says Americans are not allowed any "reasonable expectation of privacy" in their person--or at least in their cell phones. U.S. Department of Justice lawyers say, "Citizens Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the phone company reveals your records to the government that show where your mobile device placed and received calls."

Only a totalitarian régime would be so afraid of free American citizens.

Is ones belief in the U.S. Constitution, a conspiracy theory? To Obama it appears to be.Obama is opposing both economic and personal freedom. Is this the change he talked about in his campaign? Yes, this is what one should have expected from someone indoctrinated by Muslims, mentored by Frank Davis, Saul Alinsky, who is friends with terrorist Bill Ayres, and whose "spiritual” advisor is the well known America hater, and Black Muslim Terrorists leader, Jeremiah Wright.

News commentator Glenn Beck once called Sunstein "the most dangerous man in America”. Now the most dangerous man in the free world is the imam of Kenya, Barrack Hussein Obammah.

Obama is trying to get Congress to adopt South Carolina’s 1952 State Subversives Act as Federal law. Now that **Constitutionalists, have been identified by this administration as subversive enemies of the State -- this could mean that Constitutional Conservatives may have to register as subversive enemies of the state or go to jail and be fined up to $25,000.

(** those that believe that the U.S. Constitution is the highest law of the land, by which all other laws should be scrutinized,)

Could this be the position our 'Forefathers' found themselves in after they signed the Declaration of Independence? Of course, freedom was considered idealistic, subversive and advocating the overthrow of the government. It is exactly what is going on here and now. Constitutionalism, freedom, inalienable rights, capitalism, right to life, moral Christian values all are once again considered subversive, anti-government, and therefore advocating the overthrow of the U.S. Government. .

Trust me now, beginning in November of this year, and on into the year 2012, we had better overthrow this government or we will be right back where we started --- in Europe in the 1500’s.

The act states anyone who advocates overthrowing the government of the U.S. "shall register with the secretary of state."

The law, which has been on the books since 1952, does however allow specifically for freedom of speech to criticize the government, and could be used today to enhance the prosecution of anyone suspected of terror-related crimes. But wait until the Obama dynasty gets a hold of it and federalizes it.

The State law is fairly brief, citing penalties of up to $25,000 in fines and/or 10 years in jail for failing to comply with the requirement that "every subversive organization and organization subject to foreign control shall register with the secretary of state on forms prescribed by him within 30 days after coming into existence in this state."

The law defines "subversives" as "every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this state or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means."

Some bloggers argue the law seems to conflict with the Declaration of Independence' statement that it is the right of citizens to overthrow a government that has become corrupt and abusive.

Gene McCaskill, the senior executive assistant in the state attorney general's office, said the law was adopted at the height of the "Red Scare," the public concern in the 1950s over the advance of communism. It may have been enacted to address concerns about communists infiltrating the United States. Well guess what? Their here! They are in the White House, and in the Congress, and in…

McCaskill said the law as it was written is very much a valid statute in today's war on terror that could be used to prosecute anyone suspected of terror-related acts. "If someone were charged with an act of terrorism, he also could be charged under this law."

McCaskill also said the act itself protects freedom of speech for critics of government.The law itself states, "Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize, require or establish censorship or to limit in any way or infringe upon freedom of the press or of speech as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and no regulation shall be promulgated hereunder having that effect."

South Carolina Secretary of State Mark Hammond said that in his research on the law, he found only one instance in which a filing was submitted to his office, and that happened just days ago. "I think that a lot of people are having fun with this," he said. "I think a lot of people felt like this was a new piece of legislation, to have fun, to try to raise questions."

The only filing on record under the state's "Subversive Agent Form" is from Steve Kempf, who gives an address in Grove City, Ohio. He checked the "yes" box when asked, "Do you or your organization directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, the state of South Carolina or any political division thereof?" "I believe the United States is headed for Theocracy. In order to circumvent this, I have proposed counter-measures. These include, but are not limited to: Kicking republicans (sic) present, laughing during speeches made by such fools (sic)," the application states.

Hammond said it came with a $5 payment for the registration, as required by law. The registration was stamped by the state Feb. 10, 2010

This being said, could this law be federally perverted, and be used against ordinary American citizens? The issue of government crackdowns on speech and ideology is anything but a joking matter. Read on.

The Missouri documents, as they came to be called, the group said, "attempted to politicize police and cast suspicion on millions of Americans. They listed over 32 characteristics police should watch for as signs or links to domestic terrorists, which could threaten police officers, court officials, and infrastructure targets."

Police were instructed to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, The Federal Reserve, and the North American Union, in other words, Conservatives --- the majority of U.S. citizens.

The Napolitano DocumentsThe Missouri controversy was just the tip of the iceberg, however. WorldNet Daily reported only weeks later when a Department of Homeland Security report Janit Napelitano head of Homeland Security, warned about the possibility of violence by unnamed "right-wing extremists" concerned about illegal immigration, increasing federal power, restrictions on firearms, abortion and the loss of U.S. sovereignty and singled out Christians and returning war veterans as particular threats.

The document, first reported by former Mayor of San Diego Ca Roger Hedgecock, now a talk-radio hostand WND columnist, went on to suggest worsening economic woes, potential new legislative restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities has lead to political unrest.

The report from DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis defined right-wing extremism in the U.S. as "divided into those groups, movements and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups) and those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

Most notable was the report's focus on the impact of returning war veterans. "Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists," it said. "DHS is concerned that right-wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize veterans in order to boost their violent capacities.” Boy! Are they running scared or what?

THE BOTTOM LINE: With friends like this in Government, who needs enemies? Is our own Government actually as much of an enemy of America, as Islam? Do they both have the same agenda? Is our own liberal government really the coup de tant subversive here, not only advocating, but involved in the overthrow of our Constitutional Republic and replacing it with a Social Communist Dictatorship?.

I know, this reeks of a conspiracy theory, but remember, the American Revolutionary War was the result of a conspiracy by only a handful of American citizens.

So who are the conspirators here, the “Right Wing Conservative Extremists” who want their freedom back and to save this “Constitutional Federal Republic, or the “Left Wing Liberal Extremist who want to incrementally take your freedom, socialize and nationalize the entire country?

The Right wants an Independent Free Republic, and the Left wants a Dependant Controlled Nation.

Since Carter we haven’t had such a Wussy president - that is until now. Moreover, this could be dangerous.

By de AndréaThe U.S. Navy should be interdicting fuel shipments to Iran to pressure the regime to halt its development of nuclear weapons — but President Obama doesn’t have the grit to do that, the United States is more vulnerable to terrorist attacks because Obama has “terrorized” the anti-terror investigators.

On Thursday morning, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: محمود احمدی نژاد, declared Iran a “nuclear state” and Obama has absolutely refused to get tough with Iran, as a result Iran is going to sooner or later develop nuclear weapons — unless Israel is gutsy enough and willing to accept the losses it would incur in a preemptive unrepentant attack.

There are some very simple things that we could do to stymie Iran. For example, forty five percent of Iran’s fuel is imported. Because the Iranians don’t have the refineries to convert enough of their oil to gasoline etc. they must import it mostly through Dubai.

The United States could interdict that flow of gasoline. We could just stop it, or persuade Dubai not to be complicit in sending it. Obama will not take that step. He talks about all other kinds of dubious sanctions that are not meaningful, but he will not take this key step. He doesn’t have the courage to do that, or the commitment, Israel may have to take action on its own and attack Iran, with devastating consequences to Iran and to Israel.

The unintelligent Obama administration.Vice President Joe Biden said in an interview this week that he expects more terrorist attacks in the U.S., similar to the attempted Christmas Day bombing. Can you say, I wonder why? These terrorists slip through the cracks, it’s not fate, it’s Obama’s policies that are causing this.

One of the things that are really helping al-Qaida is that we do things like stupidly releasing the details of the interrogation of the Nigerian underwear bomber. We said he’s giving us all kinds of detailed information.

In releasing those statements they are stupidly sending this message to al-Qaida: ‘Change whatever plans you had’. Assume that this guy is singing and he’ll tell the Feds everything, ‘change your plans’.

THE BOTTOM LINE: U.S. Military intelligence, FBI, the CIA, all seem to be so terrified of the Obama administration that they are becoming virtually ineffective.

I don’t really know if Obama is a wuss, if he is just ignorant, or if he has unprecedented intelligence and is doing all this purposely, but the end - result will be the same.

This, along with the dismantling of our military, is no longer just political correctness, it is the enabling of our enemy, it is downright aiding and abetting.

Recently the Federal Government; among other things, has been dictating ones diet by forcing restaurants to provide low calorie meals and making them publish the calories on their menu. But airlines are also dictating how large one can be, by providing us with these tiny little children’s seats. All in the name of “Safety”

By de Andréa

Kevin Smith, a well known Hollywood actor, comic, producer, and director was told by a Southwest Airlines flight attendant that he was just too fat to fly. The fact that he did fit into the airline seat didn’t seem to matter. Safety issue? What safety Issue? Kevin, needless to say, is not pleased.

I can relate to this story in the since that in another life, I worked for a major airline. Back then we required that ‘large persons’, now called ‘persons of size’, (as if us skinny people don’t have any dimensions at all,) were required to fly first class where the seats were about a third larger ‘or’ they would have to purchase two coach seats. Except for the first class seats which are now missing on most flights, the rules haven’t changed much.

If one has ever entered a restaurant or any public building, one has encountered wheel chair access. It begins already in the parking lot where the rest of us must park up to 100 yards away even though there are a dozen available blue spots right next to the building.

Trust me, the business owners don’t necessarily provide all these conveniences out of their heartfelt concern for the disabled. It is the government regulatory agencies that will shut down the business of they do not provide these amenities for the ambulatorally challenged.

So why don’t the airlines have to provide larger seats for the “persons of size”, as they so tactfully and tastefully and political correctly refer to fat people?

Monday, February 15, 2010

I grew up in the most powerful and consequently the safest country in the world. Today I wonder if it is still the same country. Are we still powerfully safe?

By de Andréa

According to naval expert Seth Cropsey, the United States Navy for example, hasn't been as small as it is today since the administration of William Howard Taft. This dire development leaves the U.S. extremely vulnerable. A growing Chinese fleet could keep the declining U.S. Navy out of the Western Pacific. The U.S. also could be faced with new military challenges around the globe because of the projection of power a growing Chinese navy would present. Yet, the U.S. Navy has cut back the number and type of ships to the level it was prior to the Reagan administration. Indeed, the Navy hasn't been as small since the administration of William Howard Taft, according to naval expert Seth Cropsey.

The dire development leaves the U.S. vulnerable to "proliferation, resource scarcity, environmental change, the emergence of new international power centers including non-state actors, significant changes in relative U.S. power, failed states and demographic change … (in) an increasingly unstable future and a challenging international strategic environment," Cropsey said.

Cropsey, who served during the Reagan and George H. W. Bush administrations as a principal deputy under the secretary of the Navy, said the U.S. Navy is "in distress."He said the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have "sucked the oxygen" out of any effort to understand the connection between the large changes strategic planners see in the future or the ability to wield global influence through U.S. naval power.

"The size, shape and strategy of the U.S. Navy are a critical element of America's position as the world's great power," Cropsey said. "Our ability to protect or rend asunder the globe's ocean-going lines of communication is inseparable from our position as the world's great power. "But very few outside a small community of naval officers and selected military and foreign policy analysts appreciate the strategic results of American sea power's slow but steady diminution," he added.

Globally, Cropsey said, the U.S. Navy's continued attrition also means a serious threat to the security of the world's sea lines of communication and the choke points such as the Straits of Hormuz near Iran through which some 40 percent of the world's energy and other trade pass. "The consequences of a much-diminished U.S. fleet are complemented by the American public's ignorance of them, the slow yet steady pace of naval deterioration, and the increasing time and dismayingly large resources needed to recoup sea power surrendered slowly over decades," Cropsey said.

The gradual decline in the U.S. Navy comes hardly as a surprise to Congress. Last May, Adm. Gary Roughhead, chief of naval operations, told the House Armed Services Committee the Navy was stretched in its ability to modernize and "procure the Navy for tomorrow.” He said the Navy would reduce its carrier fleet from 12 to 9 for at least three years, which would increase the interval between a departing carrier and its replacement's arrival "along with the associated risk of absence during a crisis."

A separate Congressional Research Service report by naval analyst Ronald O'Rourke told Congress that China has built or is in the process of building four new classes of nuclear and conventional-powered attack and ballistic-missile submarines.

Is China as big a threat as IslamA secret intelligence report warns a number of Western nations soon could be caught up in a new "cold war" brewing between China and the United States. The dispute apparently was sparked by a Washington decision to arm Taiwan with $6.4 billion of state-of-the art weapons systems. The deal includes 60 Black Hawk helicopters, 114 Patriot anti-missile missiles, and 12 Harpoon missiles.

Now the impact could be felt in Britain as well as Germany, France and other European nations that have substantial trading relationships with China.

For the U.K., the slowest nation to recover from global recession, any threat to its business relations with China could be devastating.

The threat is contained in a highly confidential report about the U.S. sale to Taiwan and Washington's criticism of China's position on Tibet, climate change, Internet freedom, and human rights that has poisoned relationships between the Obama administration and Beijing.

The collective views of global industrialists, internationalists, economists, and heads of companies who trade with China have been analyzed by Britain’s MI6 strategists for the intelligence service's political chief, Foreign Secretary David Milliband.

Sources close to Milliband say he is alarmed that the Chinese leadership could use the arms sale to Taiwan as a reason to sell a range of its latest weapons to Syria and Iran to kick-start the trading cold war. Both those countries already present strategic problems for America, Britain, and other nations that trade with China. "Certainly Britain would strongly object to China arming either country," said a Foreign Office source in London.

One of the Beijing leaders, Liu Menxiong, last week insisted, "If Washington can arm Taiwan we should trade what we like and with whom we wish. The North Koreans have stood up to America and nothing has happened to them. And Iran is doing the same. We will support them against America"

THE BOTTOM LINE: In the face of an ever growing foreign threat, the last several U.S. administrations have allowed our military to atrophy. This is after all one of the only promises that Obama made in his campaign speeches that he has kept. He said that he would reduce U.S. nuclear capability, and shrink the U.S. military. Obama has done more toward this goal in one year than any president has in their entire term, at the same time encouraging our enemy Iran to develop Nuclear weapons.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

I say new military mind, because the old military mind was trained to win wars. The new military mind is trained to win friends and (as Sarah Palin says) "play hopey changey "with our enemies.

By de Andréa

Somewhere in the first paragraph of the war college manual, it states, as part of the very foundation of war, to “know your enemy”. know who your enemy is’…

Inside the new American military mind is something that prevents us from ever winning this war against the Nation of Islam. Because it prevents us from ever knowing just who this enemy really is.

The new politically correct - multi-cultural religion of the west idealisticlly cultivates the concept of group-hugs and that we can all learn to get along if we just learn to accept each other.

The concepts of the Reagan doctrine, “Peace through strength” and “Trust but verify” are ridiculed as war mongers and hate crimes. If we had followed the doctrine of political correctness during the Second World War we would be a divided country today. West of the Mississippi would be part of the country of Japan and east of the giant river would be under German Nazi dictatorship, as well as all of Europe, Asia, and Africa.

President Truman won and ended the war with Japan with the obvious threat of complete genocide of the Japanese people and their country; as a result today we still have peace with Japan.

Peace through war.The concept of peace through war is now nothing but an underling memory of days gone by. The thing of it is, history is about days gone by. Moreover, no where in history has lasting peace ever been negotiated. But as in the Freudian theory of insanity we now continue to make the same negative mistakes, expecting a different and positive result.

The blind ignorance continues after the Ft. Hood jihadist massacre and the near-miss terrorist act of the “Underwear Bomber.”

“On November 5, 2009, the United States Army was viciously attacked from within by an ideologue bent on pursuing an agenda of Islamic Jihad. This ideologue fell under the separatist influence of political Islam, not while serving as an officer in the U.S. military, but from his birthright as a Muslim. It is incumbent upon our military to begin to understand this theo-political ideology that threatens our soldiers and our country internally and externally.” These critical lines are completely missing from thePentagon’s 84-page report reviewing the massacre of 13 U.S. soldiers and contractors at Fort Hood. Yet this is only one of many omissions that the Pentagon should obviously pursue from this incident.

The result of the new military mind is that our entrenched mindset of victimization and political correctness is precluding a vitally necessary open discussion of faith-based issues both inside and outside of the military. The current military and governmental culture precluded Hasan’s superiors from questioning anything relating to his religious faith.

At a Jan. 15, 2010, press conference Secretary Robert Gates himself confirmed this state of affairs:

“Current policies on prohibited activities provide neither the authority nor the tools for commanders and supervisors to intervene when DOD personnel {are} at risk of personal radicalization.”

Yet the secretary has recommended Secretary of the Army John McHugh “take appropriate action” with regards to the report’s recommendations for “personnel responsible for supervising Major Hasan.” Those recommendations include career-ending reprimands for several of his superiors.

How can we hold these soldiers responsible for not preventing Hasan’s actions if we aren’t giving them the environment and the tools they need to confront Islamic terrorism within the military? The military cannot allow the mantra of victimization of Muslims to dominate how it handles force protection. Islamic terrorism is real and it cannot be confronted unless we are honest about the threat it represents. Hasan is not the first American military Islamic terrorist and he won’t be the last if we do not address the truth

Fort Hood gunman Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan wasn't the only terrorists working on a Texas Army base the day of the shooting who had links to Islamic terrorists. Louay Safi for example, a high-ranking official in ISNA, the Islamic Society of North America (a known terrorist organization) The articlenotes that, in spite of Safi’s questionable public statements and connections with terrorist Muslims, he has been retained by the military to teach our soldiers about Islam! It is about time that we learn something about our enemy after eight years into this war, but do you think it is a good idea to hire the enemy to teach us. (They lie you know)

In a February 5th article on our friend Steven Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) website, we read that Omar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the “Underwear Bomber,” spent two weeks in Houston attending a course conducted by the AlMaghrib Institute. According to the article, this was the third AlMaghrib course Abdulmutallab had taken. This article tells us a great deal about the kind of “education” Abdulmutallab was getting—right here in the United States—and sheds light on what motivated Abdulmutallab to decide to engage in jihad.

For instance, videotapes obtained by IPT show the Houston director of AlMaghrib glorifying jihad and honoring a man who was sentenced to life in prison for soliciting Jihadists to wage war against the United States.

The article begs the question, at what point, do Jihadists, who train others in violent militant jihad against the United States, lose their rights to free speech in our country?

Can’t we all just get along sing cum bi ya and have a group hug? No we can’t.

The deceptionIf you can remember, a while back a Muslim group called “Muslims Against Sharia” responded to one of my more - stab them in the eye articles, and tried to convince me that they, as moderate warm-fuzzy middle of the road Muslims, were going to reform Islam. (I published the entire dialog between us on this web site) I soon discovered what was meant by “Reform”. I challenged them when they said they had rewritten the Quran, leaving out the entire militant Jihadist “kill the Kaffaar stuff” and the law of Sharia. My Challenge was “By whose authority do you change and or eliminate your god Allah’s words”. Their response was as you might have guessed, indirect at best. They responded with “Well, the Christian religion reformed!” I could only guess that they were referring to the Protestant Reformation. I supposed that they thought I didn’t know anything about Islam or Christianity. My response back to them ended of our discussion about the so-called Muslim Reformation. I wrote back to them and said, “The Protestant Reformation changed people, not the word of God”.

The point hear is, unlike the Protestant Reformation of Catholicism, which was a reformation of the people, in other words, the people were corrupt not the religion. Islam on the other hand cannot change when the Quran still teaches them to kill the Kaffaar as well as oppress the world with Sharia law. As far as “Muslims Against Sharia” are concerned, Muslims have been trying to deceive Infidels for years with the “Islam is a peaceful religion” routine. Moreover, publishing a special Quran for the Kaffaar without all the negative parts only supports that deception.

In my book “The Deception” the opening paragraph points out that the religion of Islam is nothing but a deception, moreover, the most deceived people about Islam are Muslims. The next most deceived are all the rest of us Infidels deceived by the deceived people of Islam, truly an example of the blind leading the blind.

When our government allows the very people that we are at war with, to be members of our own military, then our government is deceived, (they just don’t get it). Just as during the Second World War, we were at war in Europe with a religious ideology called Nazism; we were not a war with the German people. Today we are at war in the Middle East, not with the Arab people but with a religious ideology called Islam. Just as we were at war with Nazis then, today we are at war with Muslims.

One is either a Muslim or one is not!What our Judeao Christian Western society fails to understand is just as there are no warm-fuzzy moderate middle of the road Nazis, there are also no warm-fuzzy middle of the road moderate Muslims. If one identifies oneself with Nazis then one follows the philosophies of the ‘Third Riche’ and what is taught in Mine Kampf. Muslims identify themselves with Islam by following the teachings of Allah in the Quran and Muhammad in the Hadith.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Electing Muslims to high congressional positions in our government, hiring Muslims as teachers in our schools or to do sensitivity training for our security agencies, granting tax free status to so-called Muslim charities, (which are nothing but terrorist supporting organizations) are all part of the process of deceptive infiltration. Not for the purpose of assimilation, but for the purpose of oppression. Not for becoming one of us, but to change us, into one of them. (It’s in the Hadith; they are just following a book written by their prophet)

Today we haven’t yet identified whom we are at war with. Our Pentagon identifies the war as “The Overseas Contingency”. The Muslim Terrorists are called “Insurgents” Making up ignorant names for them isn’t going make them any less dangerous or make them go away.

As I said the opening paragraph in the War College manual says; “first, identify your enemy”.

We haven’t even taken the first step to winning this war… Moreover, it is now the longest and most expensive war in American history.

The war is not only in the Middle East, it is right here, smoldering in our schools, in our government and in our streets and neighborhoods. There are now more Muslim terrorists living in the State of Michigan than there are in the entire Country of Afghanistan.

Do you think we could be so infiltrated by our enemy the Nation of Islam --- that we no longer intend to win this war?

Monday, February 08, 2010

No! The Obama eligibility issue is not dead, and it is not going away! Obama has presented a proof of life certificate, not a birth certificate.

By Gary Kreep, Executive Director of the United States Justice Foundation

FEBRUARY 1, 2010, could quire possibly be the beginning of our return to freedom in America! That was the day that United States Justice Foundation on behalf of all Americans filed an Opening Appellants Brief (AOB) in the California Appellant Court against the Defendants-Respondents: the disputed president BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Vice-president Joe Biden, and Secretary of the State of California Debra BOWEN, as well as several others, involved in the fraudulent misrepresentation and subsequent cover up.

Here is how our brief, in part, reads: “APPELLANTS allege that OBAMA is legally disabled by his birth status. Therefore, all votes cast in favor of the OBAMA/BIDEN joint and severable ticket by the California Electors should be deemed null and void, since the votes were cast for an individual ineligible to run for the office of President of the United States.”

On behalf of YOUR United States Justice Foundation (USJF), I respectfully requested a REVERSAL of the trial court judgment sustaining the Respondents’ “demurrer,” which means that the defendant in a case does not dispute the truth of the allegations in the lawsuit, but claims that there are not sufficient legal grounds to justify a court granting relief.

I know that you already admire these great Americans that I represent in this historic lawsuit: Dr. Alan KEYES (Presidential candidate for the American Independent Party in 2008), Vice-Presidential nominee for the same party in 2008, Dr. Wiley Drake, and California Elector Markham Robinson. As you know, these are all great, patriotic Americans.

John McCain had a lawsuit filed against him, to force him to establish his citizenship (Hollander v. McCain) during his campaign for President! After he produced evidence and official documents, and after Congressional hearings (!), the U. S., by Senate Resolution 511, John McCain was recognized as a “natural born citizen and therefore was found eligible to run for the office of president of the United States.

There is no such evidence for Obama. There were no such hearings by congress, and no such resolution passed by the U.S. Senate that recognized Obama even as a U.S. citizen, natural born or other wise. There was however a plethora of lawsuits filed against Obama which he refused to recognize.

At issue is the constitutional eligibility requirement of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States!

I’ve received hate mail. I’ve had threats made against my life. I’ve been relentlessly ridiculed by the mainstream media. But yet I continue the fight to SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH!! America deserves the truth.

YOU DESERVE THE TRUTH!

The mainstream media has called me every name in the book. But, like the well-trained lawyer that I am, I answer their charges: line-upon-line, precept upon precept.

I am not mean-spirited, as depicted by the liberal media. If Mr. Obama produced a real birth certificate that proved that he was a “natural born” citizen of the United States of America, I would be the first one to “salute” him as president. HOWEVER---

As of this very moment, there has been NO GENUINE, BONAFIDE, MEANINGFUL, EVIDENCE, shown by him or by his lawyers to satisfy any court of law that he is an American citizen, much less a “natural born” citizen!! NONE!! We’ve been at this fight for well over one year; and, now, I believe that we have a legal case that has a real “LEGAL BITE” to our contention that Barack Hussein Obama is not the President of the United States, according to our own United States Constitution!

The issue of whether Mr. Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States is one that has “significant political overtones,” given that it has a direct relation to the election of the most powerful political office in the United States (for the world, for that matter). But it is an issue that is a defining moment, for which the Court must make a determination; the requirements are clearly stated in Article II, Section 1, Clause 4, of the U. S. Constitution. And courts routinely decide questions of law and of fact such as the issue in this case.

But there are many enormous forces coming against the United States Justice Foundation (USJF) and the American People. This is no ordinary case. This is like the war of the gladiators; actually more like David and Goliath! Not to be flippant, but, basically, USJF is David; and Mr. Obama and his cronies are Goliath! The supposed “forces of change” has come against us with everything that they’ve got! As a lawyer, I shouldn’t use the word “mafia” – but … it is unbelievable what we are facing!

As of the filing of our brief last Monday, Barack Hussein Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his vault (original hospital) birth records and supporting hospital records. Mr. Obama’s citizenship status has been challenged in over 20 different legal actions in various federal and state courts; these challenges cast doubt on the validity of this electoral process, regardless of this outcome.

Here is the short of what we know at this very moment: Mr. Obama entered this race for President without having met the eligibility requirements for the office of President of the United States. From a legal standpoint, Dr. Alan Keyes and Dr. Drake have been injured because they did not have fair competition for the offices they sought. They were not given a fair opportunity to obtain votes for President and Vice-President of the United States! They sustained “injuries/loss,” according to Federal Court case law. I know that all this sounds like a lot of legal terminology---but all that we simply want is the TRUTH---is Barack Obama qualified, by our own U. S. Constitution, to serve as President of the United States.

NO---I am not on some “witch hunt,” as the media has painted me. Veterans, soccer moms, businessmen, school kids, seniors, divorcees, hard workers---all they want is THE TRUTH! Especially our men serving in “harm’s way” in our military--they really need to know! Is Obama really their commander and chief?

As i said, John McCain had a lawsuit filed against him, to force him to establish his citizenship (Hollander v. McCain) during his campaign for President! After he produced evidence and official documents, and after Congressional hearings (!), the U. S., by Senate Resolution 511, John McCain was recognized as a “natural born citizen.” If he had to go through these “hoops”---why didn’t his presidential opponent have to do the same?

Here is how our United States Constitution actually reads: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

Here again is how our brief, in part, reads: “APPELLANTS allege that OBAMA is legally disabled by his birth status. Therefore, all votes cast in favor of the OBAMA/BIDEN joint and severable ticket by the California Electors should be deemed null and void, since the votes were cast for an individual ineligible to run for the office of President of the United States.”

It’s just that plain and simple!

Never in my wildest imagination would I ever think of me having to do this in the United States of America. And, despite what you may have been told by the Obama-controlled media, there are a number of legal precedents for this action.

Like former radical, Black Panther leader Eldridge Cleaver, who was taken off Presidential ballots , both in Utah and in California (the California removal resulted in the ACLU filing a lawsuit to put him back on the Presidential ballot that went all the way up to the United States Supreme Court—and California won that case!) for not being old enough... Like former North Dakota Governor Thomas H. Moodie, who was duly elected to be that state’s governor; however, afterward, it was discovered that he had not resided in the state for a requisite five years before running for office, and, because of that ineligibility, he was REMOVED from office by that State’s Supreme Court in 1935.

I assure you; I am not on a personal vendetta against Barack Hussein Obama. JUST LET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE KNOW THE TRUTH!

THE BOTTOM LINE: voters DO NOT have the power, or the right, (according to the U. S. Constitution!!) to determine the eligibility of a candidate---no matter how popular that person may be!

Here is the crux of this particular case: Ms. Bowen, the California Secretary of State, did NOT exercise her required “due diligence,” by certifying candidates to run for office without verifying that they had met all of the requirements of eligibility for the office.

What proof do we need?

• An original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor who delivered the candidate.

• A passport with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries.

• Any other documents that could certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

I watched Mr. Obama at his first State of the Union address last week; then his revealing budget speech, shortly before I filed these pleadings in court. Amazingly, I asked myself (just like tens of millions of other inquiring Americans!!)---what in the world does Barack Hussein Obama have to hide? With your continued help, we shall soon see what he has been hiding! Thank you for your support and for your prayers for our success.