Intellectually Erect.

On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton

Erik Verlinde

Starting from first principles and general assumptions Newton’s law of gravitation is shown to arise naturally and unavoidably in a theory in which space is emergent through a holographic scenario. Gravity is explained as an entropic force caused by changes in the information associated with the positions of material bodies. A relativistic generalization of the presented arguments directly leads to the Einstein equations. When space is emergent even Newton’s law of inertia needs to be explained. The equivalence principle leads us to conclude that it is actually this law of inertia whose origin is entropic.

Note the end of the abstract. Where it says “The equivalence principle leads us to conclude that it is actually this law of inertia whose origin is entropic.”

I have always hated the non-explanation of inertia. To me it makes no sense to not explain why something tends to move the way it does. Every other thing in the universe tends towards entropy, why is the movement of a mass not behaving similarly?

I’m only ten pages into the paper but I’m having a blast reading it.

The reality? Awful lots of “if we assume” arguments get used to build up to “first principles” and so I find my self at 11 pages saying to myself that while it’s fun and all it’s probably mostly B.S. But I’ll finish it out anyway. If nothing else it’s fun to entertain different ideas.

“If this is all about surviving politically, then we’re missing the whole purpose of what we’re supposed to be doing… – Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd

In this case “surviving politically” entails doing the will of your constituents. It entails trusting that the constituents are big boys and girls and can be allowed self-determination. But apparently the elite of the elected aristocracy (no one else wants the damn job) don’t feel that voters should be allowed to have a say in matters. That’s the lesson we take home from Reid, Pelosi, and Obama, who are content to keep the legislation from being open and transparent.

The Rev. Al Sharpton on Monday said he was disturbed by condescending remarks reportedly made by former President Bill Clinton about Barack Obama during the 2008 campaign.

Sharpton was referring to a passage in the new book, “Game Change,” which recounts the conversation Clinton had with the late Sen. Ted Kennedy whenhe was trying to convince the liberal lion of the Senate to endorse his wife for president.

“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee,” Clinton told Kennedy, according to the book — a comment that angered Kennedy, who later endorsed Obama.

Sharpton, speaking on Fox News, defended Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid over a passage in the book in which he said Obama doesn’t have a “Negro dialect” unless he wants one. But the reverend would not give Clinton such a pass for his remark.

“I think that’s far more disturbing because this is someone seeking to stop Mr. Obama’s campaign and making a direct reference — I don’t know the context in which he said it — but that is far more disturbing to me than even the comments that were made by Mr. Reid,” Sharpton said.

But it’s ok for the first black president to say such things, right? It’s only the first black president talking about the not-quite-but-soon second black president, right?

Sharpton admits he doesn’t know the context but opens his mouth anyway. Will someone just shut the man up?

****

This guy needs to get a date. Oh, that’s right, he couldn’t get one so he made one.

Now I’m stunned. I’ve never known anyone who had a copy of The Villain/Cactus Jack or had seen it! Other than me – of course!

Yeah – I call it “Roadrunner pranks with live actors”! I love it when Douglas paints the fake tunnel entrance on the cliff – hoping his victims will crash – and Ahnold and Ann actually ride their wagon into the black opening!

It’s so stupid, its great!

And in the Three/Four Musketeers I like all the sotto voce comments the menials and help make under their breath.

“He tore our carpet!” and “Aw, my arm! She’s put on weight”.

But my favorite line is the officer at La Rochelle dictating a letter to his wife, saying, “The battle went badly today because – well – no one would listen to me!”

My Personal “Things” – Don’t Peek

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This website (blog) may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, religious and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. Please Note: If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.