SYMMETRIC PHILOSOPHY (June '08)Be one of the three people on earth to fully read this & get a gold stickerPlease email comments (email: correct the spelling of sqkuiiiiish@sqkuisih7.com)

Read
the introduction below for the main theme of symmetric being, then read
any of these eight sections in any order. Each examines the
problem from a different angle.

ABSTRACT

The following takes
a core idea -- that existence is a vast, endless fish tank, created by
nothingness tearing itself apart like a fractal from the simple
equation z=z2+c, the rule for existence being that life can exist if a
perfect inverse is created for every thing, nothingness breaking into
infinite sets of two opposites feeding off one another, via the simple
perfect mathematical rule that all life feeds off a perfect opposite.
Read the intro to this idea below first, then choose any of the topics to the
left to read. There are 40,320 ways to read this theory (8
factorial), you need only pick one.

..

SYMMETRIC PHILOSOPHY: INTRO

Breathe out, so I can breathe you in….–Foo Fighters

Your pain becomes my peace--Jars of clay

There
are many core
truths in light outside of the shadows of the Plato's cave that make us
re-think the universe we understand when we see them. One of
these, in a phrase, is that cheesecake is murder. That that the
only reason we are conscious or exist feel any emotion or sensory
perception or have idea or knowledge, is that we are tearing, ripping,
off of something feeling our exact inverse. Heaven and hell do
not exist separately, but necessitate eachother, each feeding and
tearing off the other; all joy raping pain, the explanation for the
existence of suffering obvious: joy cannot exist with raping it.
All Being is perfectly symmetric and self-sustained, in an
eternal
spinning equilibrium, the result of what could have remained
nothingness instead tearing itself apart into a vast fractal of life
created only from this one rule. I attempt to understand the
specifics of how this occurs in a very mathematical way, like
understanding your soulmate through the perfection of calculus.

We are entirely surrounded in opposition. War and peace, love and
hate, work and play, crime and punishment, Christ and
Anti-Christ. These do not just happen to haphazardly exist at the
same time, but we find each absolutely needs and feeds of the
other. A villian does not build his empire on a remote
island. He tortures and enslaves the people and the hero, and the
hero must likewise need the defeat of evil to triumph. Just to
say "war" is to say "peace" as well. We cannot talk of a
holocaust without implying the war to triumph over it and fund the
cause of peace. We cannot say "dictatorship" without implying "a
horrid lack of freedom". To speak of pure intrinsic love is
imply, love that we
struggle and suffer to find and obtain, subject to its equally tragic
destruction. Romeo and Juliet are cursed with the forbidden they
cannot have, and finally when they might have obtained it, must
die. To say nirvana implies a lifelong struggle with the worldly
to even have the chance of achieving it.

To exist among this civil war of opposition and not reach the ultimate
conclusion that in fact our very consciousnss itself necessitates a
perfect inverse behind our backs -- an un-person in a world of orange
skies, black clouds, and red grass, who enjoy work and detest TV, who
we torture when we fall in love, and who gladly torture us when we
suffer depression and death -- is absurd. It is to be light blue,
and look around and find all other colors, dark and light, except for
the one keystone to white -- black (or un-white) -- that reveals
the perfect symmetry of all we see.

To not go even further, and integrate this theme into all our belief
and philosophy, is to be content with our wall shadows and
be blind to the only light generating them. To observe "I exist;
I am" should be to also observe the single core conclusion: "I think,
therefore something un-thinks," or to reduce this to two words, "I
half-think." Since we have not done this, this truth demands
a moderate re-examination of our beliefs. In this paper I've
begun
to apply this philosophy to science, math, color (visual sensaton), a
fractal-based view of existence, and the main philosphical branches:
metaphysics, logic, knowledge, and ethics. I've carefully
constructecd these divisions to be readable in any order with as little
redundancy as possible, each augmenting the others, whichever are
read. And as you read, consider there is only a single principle
allowing you to do so.