POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

They have made estimates for the legal costs for the process and seek donations. These estimates can be found by following the links.

The attorneys in the group are predominantly public interest attorneys with good track records. They successfully got a grand jury seated in the Southern District of NY to review the criminal evidence compiled regarding WTC 1, 2 & 7 controlled demolition last year after dealing with much foot-dragging and slow-walking by the DOJ.

For a discussion by the attorneys when the suits were in the planning stages, follow this link to the Sept. 2016 hearings at Cooper Union Hall in NYC:

Lengthy, one can fast forward to the section featuring the lawyers group to get a good sense of who they are, how they analyze and develop strategies, and the timelines they were looking at 2.5 years ago. My recollection (I viewed the entire event) is the lawyers were towards the end of day 2.

They have made estimates for the legal costs for the process and seek donations. These estimates can be found by following the links.

The attorneys in the group are predominantly public interest attorneys with good track records. They successfully got a grand jury seated in the Southern District of NY to review the criminal evidence compiled regarding WTC 1, 2 & 7 controlled demolition last year after dealing with much foot-dragging and slow-walking by the DOJ.

For a discussion by the attorneys when the suits were in the planning stages, follow this link to the Sept. 2016 hearings at Cooper Union Hall in NYC:

Lengthy, one can fast forward to the section featuring the lawyers group to get a good sense of who they are, how they analyze and develop strategies, and the timelines they were looking at 2.5 years ago. My recollection (I viewed the entire event) is the lawyers were towards the end of day 2.

The complaint cites the failure of the FBI and its 2014-2015 9/11 Review Commission to assess key 9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been aware of, regarding:

1) the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center buildings, 1, 2 and 7; 2) arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11; 3) terrorist financing regarding the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers; 4) recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations; 5) video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; 6) cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.

About the « “High Fivers” the complaint states: « However, Plaintiff Lawyers’ Committee received a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response from the FBI on February 27, 2018 relating to a previously submitted FOIA request submitted to the FBI for records related to the photographs and film obtained during or as a result of the arrests of the above referenced “high-fivers,” and related records. In this FBI FOIA response letter the FBI stated “Records which may have been responsive to your request were destroyed 1/27/2014” (emphasis added). The FBI’s destruction in January of 2014 of these records relevant to the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress at the end of the same month in which the 9/11 Review Commission was established by the FBI to comply with the mandate from Congress effectively prevented and obstructed compliance with the mandate from Congress."

This means that the FBI probably deliberately destroyed all the evidence he possessed that was dangerous for the official account of the events of September 11, 2001. Maybe this destruction also concerns videos of the pentagon attack.