That would be fine - to move the information to the web site as a resource
guide.
-----Original Message-----
From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 05:41 PM
To: danield@w3.org
Cc: lynne rosenthal; www-qa-wg@w3.org; ij@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Issue #22
At 12:30 PM 1/7/02 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
> > But what it seems to reduce to is: Should the Introduction be an
> > introduction to the Framework documents alone? Or, to the QA Activity
as
>
>My vote goes to an Intro for the Framework only, with a bit of QA
>context but not the whole explanation like now. So I agree with Ian
>and Lynne that most of section 2 should (and is already in fact) go on
>the site.
All comments support removing Ch.2, and having Intro be an introduction to
the Framework documents only.
Does everyone also support Ian's specific suggestion ([1]) to put it on the
Web site as a resource introduction or resource guide?
-Lofton.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Jan/0001.html