The Fault The Guilt of Most Arab Muslims

Not every single Arab is a born racist [admire courageous Arabs that stand up against it, such as many Arab Christians] nor is every single Muslim an Islamofacsist Jihadist [salute the few brave that speak up]. However, due to their current twisted upbringing the racism in the Arab world & Jihad or Jihad-apologetics are a problem in their mainstream not just in the fringes or merely "pockets" of "extremists".
Hence: Arab Racism & Islamic Jihad is The 'Guilt of Most Arab Muslims'.

Police protect girls forced to convert to Islam

Sir Ian Blair: Police and universities working together to tackle 'aggresive conversions'Extremist Muslims who force vulnerable teenage girls to convert to Islam are being targeted by police, Met chief Sir Ian Blair has revealed.

Police are working with universities to clamp down on "aggressive conversions" during which girls are beaten up and forced to abandon university courses.

The Hindu Forum of Britain claims hundreds of mostly Sikh and Hindu girls have been intimidated by Muslim men who take them out on dates before terrorising them until they convert.

Sir Ian spoke about the problem at a conference organised by the forum.

A Met spokesman said: "Neighbourhood officers work with university authorities in London and we would encourage anyone targeted in this way to seek help and support and where necessary use third party reporting facilities if they do not want to contact police directly."

Ramesh Kallidai, of the Hindu Forum of Britain, said: "Some girls are petrified because they are constantly being phoned up, having their door knocked.

"One girl was beaten up on the street and others have been forced to leave university."

• Met police chiefs are to review a controversial stop-and-search power used in the fight against terrorism. Assistant commissioner Andy Hayman, the overall head of Britain's anti-terrorist operations, said he had concerns about the number of stops carried out in London using Section 44 legislation.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Anglican Archbishop Henry Luke Orombi of UgandaNEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK — Much of the church is asleep or in “deep, dark denial” about Islam, Anglican Archbishop Henry Luke Orombi of Uganda said in New York City at the Kairos Journal Award dinner Jan. 26.

This was revealed in a story by Gregory Tomlin for Baptist press (www.bpnews.net) in which he wrote, “Orombi, named one of World magazine’s ‘Daniels of the Year’ for 2006, has been at the forefront of the Anglican church’s controversy over the open acceptance and ordination of homosexual ministers, is one of Africa’s leading voices for biblical fidelity.

Political Correctness — The Revenge of Marxism

Political Correctness — The Revenge of MarxismFjordman - 2/20/2007I have heard people who have grown up in former Communist countries say that we in the West are at least as brainwashed by Multiculturalism and Political Correctness as they ever were with Communism, perhaps more so. Even in the heyday of the East Bloc, there were active dissident groups in these countries. The scary thing is, I sometimes believe they are right.

But how is that possible? Don’t we have free speech? And we have no Gulag?[...]

Right away, everyone would have said: ‘Fascism won’t be tolerated.’ When an Arab torches a school, it’s rebellion. When a white guy does it, it’s fascism. ...

Islamists Blamed in Indo-Pakistani Train Bombing

http://www.nysun.com/article/48927

Islamists Blamed in Indo-Pakistani Train Bombing

By The Daily Telegraph

February 20, 2007

PANIPAT, India — Islamist militants were accused of trying to halt the nascent Indo-Pakistan peace talks yesterday after two bombs exploded on the New Delhi-to-Lahore train killing at least 66 people, including women and children.

The blasts, which killed mostly Pakistanis returning home after visiting relatives in India, came just 24 hours before Pakistan's foreign minister was due in New Delhi for a fresh round of talks to resolve the status of Kashmir .

The attack, mounted using crude kerosene-based incendiary devices packed into suitcases, set off fires in two of the carriages shortly after midnight local time as the train reached Panipat, a industrial town 50 miles north of New Delhi.

The train link, known as the "Friendship Express," was restarted after a two-year hiatus in 2004 as a peace dividend, reuniting families divided by the Partition of India in 1947.

Indian police said the death toll would have been considerably higher had two other explosive devices that were found on the train not failed to detonate.

Local witnesses described how passengers leapt from the train with their clothes on fire as the screams of those trapped inside filled the night. As most Indian trains have steel rods instead of glass fitted in the windows many were left trapped as temperatures rose high enough to melt metal and fuse doors closed. A laborer who lives, Rajinder Prasad, said he had rushed to the scene with his neighbors. There, they scooped up water from a reservoir and threw it on the flames, which towered above the carriages.

"We couldn't save anyone," he said. "They were screaming inside, but no one could get out." Within minutes, he added, the screams were silenced by the flames.

There were scenes of distress at Panipat's Civil Hospital where relatives came to identify the remains of their loved ones, many of whom police said will be identified only by post-mortem examinations.

Yesterday, both countries insisted that the talks, which began three years ago in an attempt to resolve the 60-year-old dispute over the Himalayan state of Kashmir, would not be thwarted by terrorism. India's Prime Minister Singh issued a statement expressing "anguish and grief" at the loss of life, while the country's home minister, Shiv Raj Patil, said, "Whoever has done it is against peace, against the friendly ties that we are trying to build with other countries."

New Delhi's response was in contrast to July last year when Islamist militants were blamed for causing 186 deaths in a coordinated series of bomb blasts on the commuter rail network in India's commercial capital, Mumbai.

Three books by three women describe the violent suppressionaffecting the lives of hundreds of millions of women.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Author

Ayaan Hirsi Ali; Ian Buruma; Mukhtar Mai; Jasvinder Sanghera

Genre

Society/Politics, Fiction

Publisher

Free Press; Atlantic Books; Virago; Hodder Stoughton

WE ARE TOLD we are living through a clash of civilisations, aclash between militant Islam and the infidels.

This is only the surface tension. There is a clash ofcivilisations, but the deeper cause is not religion. It is sex. Agreat cultural struggle is being waged about and around the rightsof women.

This month, three books by three women describe the violentsuppression that affected not just their own lives but the lives ofhundreds of millions of women like them.

For years, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the author of Infidel, wasa devout Muslim. She does not spare the gritty details of her life.As a girl in Somalia, she had her clitoris removed to make her"pure". Her clitoris and labia were cut off with scissors while shescreamed. The wound was sown up to form a thick band of scartissue, a natural chastity belt. She describes her wedding night,her divorce, then the arranged marriage to a man she despised, andher escape to Europe, bringing shame and infamy to her family andclan.

In Holland, she began to ask awkward questions: "This was aninfidel country. Why was it, then, so much better run, better led,and made for such better lives than the places we came from?Shouldn't the places where Allah was worshipped and His laws obeyedhave been at peace and wealthy, the unbelievers' countriesignorant, poor and at war?"

Working as a translator, she finds herself in women's shelterslargely full of Muslim women and police stations largely full ofMuslim men. After a decade, she concluded the host society was notthe problem: "If Muslims lagged so far behind even other immigrantgroups, then wasn't it possible that one of the reasons could beIslam? Islam influences every aspect of believers' lives. Women aredenied their social and economic rights in the name of Islam, andignorant women bring up ignorant children."

After graduating in political science from the elite LeidenUniversity, she begins to speak out against the domestic tyrannyimported from the Muslim world. As a beautiful black Muslim willingto criticise Islam and Muslims, she is singular in Holland. Shebecomes a media favourite, then a political favourite, then amember of parliament. The next chapter in her life is well known.In 2004, after writing the script for a TV film critical of Islam'streatment of women, the filmmaker, Theo van Gogh, was butchered inthe street by an Islamic fundamentalist. Police swooped in to spareHirsi Ali the same fate.

The story of van Gogh's murder is also examined by Ian Buruma inMurder In Amsterdam. Buruma, an accomplished journalistand native Dutch speaker, provides a more detached, deeper andmeasured version of this story than Infidel. Like HirsiAli, he recognises that not long ago Europe itself was locked inthe grip of religious and male dominance. "Few people in Hollandremember how recently emancipation of women came to the Dutch, orto other Europeans for that matter."

Like many liberals, Buruma is so concerned with being fair tothe poor and the marginalised that he understates, even patronises,the desire for social cohesion by the native Dutch population. Hisdepictions of Dutch nationalists are often patronising. He comparesHirsi Ali with Margaret Thatcher.

Yet Buruma never adequately confronts or undermines her mostprovocative assertion, that the majority of Muslims in Holland havefailed to integrate as have other immigrants because they don'twant to integrate, because they are more racist and insular thanthe host society.

Hirsi Ali is not the only furious woman who risked her life andcaused an international sensation in confronting sexual hypocrisyin Muslim society. In In The Name Of Honour, Mukhtar Maitells a simple story that is Shakespearean in its melodrama andsweeping implications. Mai was living in the village of Meerwala,in southern Punjab, when she was gang-raped on the orders of avillage council on June 22, 2002. It was "honour justice" imposedas punishment for a patently trumped-up charge against Mai'syounger brother, who had been accused of sexual impropriety with awoman from a higher caste, and powerful clan, in the district.

"I will never forget the faces of those animals," Mai says ofher rapists. "They don't even need to use their weapons. Rape killsher. Rape is the ultimate weapon: it shames the other clan forever."

Instead of committing suicide, the normal practice, she goes tothe police and names her rapists. Her memoir is her journey throughthe justice system, the attempt by the police to cover up thecrime, the media intervention, the threats to her life, thesubsequent rape trial. "In order to fight, it seems that I mustlose everything: my reputation, my honour, everything that was oncemy life. But that's not important. I want justice."

Her voice is channelled through a French writer, Marie-ThereseCuny, whose name does not appear on the cover but who isever-present as she turns Mai's pain into prose and her statementsinto drama.

A fourth book, Shame, by Jasvinder Sanghera, is noliterary work but has the authority of personal witness and pain.It supports the argument put by Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Mukhtar Maithat tens of millions of Asian and Muslim women suffer an invisiblefate of fear, violence, submission and confinement, even in Europe.Shame also supports Hirsi Ali's claim that immigrantsbring racism with them: "The worst thing that you can say to anAsian girl is that she is behaving like a white person".

Sanghera is not Muslim. Her family is Sikh, from India. Theylived in a quintessentially English address, Northumberland Street,Derby, but five of the six daughters were forced into arrangedmarriages that proved variously disastrous.

Only Jasvinder escaped because she ran away at 16: "Thephotograph of the man I was supposed to marry was on themantelpiece," she writes. "He was ugly as well as short, he lookedmuch older than me and he had a stupid haircut."

Her sister, Robina, trapped in a violent marriage, commitssuicide by burning herself to death, the fate of countless Asianwives. "If Robina had only ... found the courage to reach out andembrace the culture of the country she was born in, she needn'thave died ... I knew there were other women like me and Robina. Isee them every day in Derby, scuttling about like shadows."Sanghera graduates from university and opens a centre for abusedAsian women, Karma Nirvana. The women come, bringing the nowfamiliar stories of forced marriage, rape, shame, violence andabandonment.

In Pakistan, Mukhtar Mai has used her compensation payment anddonations from abroad to build a school for girls in her village, adrop in the bucket of illiteracy. In Washington, where Ayaan HirsiAli has gone into exile, she is a fellow at the American EnterpriseInstitute where she will continue to write and speak about theconditions of Muslim women. "There are times when silence becomesan accomplice to injustice," she writes in Infidel. No one can eversay we were not told.

Activist blasts Muslims, Arabs over Darfur stance

Doha • A human rights activist from Darfur yesterday blasted the Arab and Muslim world for what he described as its hypocritical stand on the troubled region in Sudan.

He said Muslims from the rest of the world should be ashamed of their indifference towards fellow Muslims being persecuted in Darfur.

Ironically, it is the Jews and Americans who are supporting the 'innocent Muslims being targeted' in the region and providing food and shelter to nearly 250,000 Darfur refugees who have fled to neighboring Chad, said Mohamed Adam Yahya.

Yahya is the founder and executive director of the US-based ‘Damanga Coalition for Freedom and Democracy’, a body committed to preserving human rights and ethnic communities in Darfur.

Speaking to The Peninsula on the sidelines of the US-Islamic World Forum here, he said: "The silence of the Arab and Islamic world on the Darfur issue is not only baffling, it is shameful. Do the Arabs and Muslims have any right to criticise America?"

Situated in the west of Sudan and spread over an area of 173,000 square miles, Darfur is double the size of France and has seven million people, mostly 'black' Muslims, living there.

According to Yahya, Sudan's total population is around 36 million and 26 per cent of the people are of Arab origin. They have been dominating politics, education, military, government jobs as well as business and the economy ever since the country attained freedom in January 1956.

Even though ‘black Muslims’ account for 75 per cent of Darfur's population, they do not enjoy any freedom. They are denied opportunities of education and cannot enter politics. They cannot become religious leaders or take up higher posts in the army or even become teachers.

“All a black Darfur Muslim can hope to become is a soldier in the Sudanese army,” said Yahya. "The Arab Sudanese consider themselves as superior. They have been discriminating against us for long."

Earlier, Yahya's scathing criticism of Muslims for their alleged silence on the plight of fellow Muslims in Darfur at the concluding session of the US-Islamic World Forum at the Ritz-Carlton yesterday was greeted with hearty applause.

The problem in Darfur actually began in 1991 with violent clashes between 'black and Arab Muslims' taking place. Taking advantage of the widening cleavage, the present government in Khartoum began supporting a local Arab militia, called the 'Janjaweed', with arms and funds. The problem was aggravated.

Yahya said that over the past four years alone, some 450,000 people have been killed in the region and another 250,000 have become homeless. They have been forced to take refuge in neighbouring Chad. “There is a genocide going on in the region and the Jews and the Americans are opposing it, while the Arabs and Muslims have chosen to be conveniently mum. It is ironical that Muslims are killing Muslims there,” said Yahya.

Why rape is not found in Islamic countries

Most of the Islamic world follows the Shariah or Sunnah legal manual known as the ‘Umdat al-Salikwhich and are made apart of the laws of almost all Muslim countries.

In most of the more repressed countries; such as Iran, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Indonesia, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Palestine, Somalia, Sudan, Sierra Leone, Syria, Afghanistan, United Arab Emirates, Bengali and Bahrain, the laws concerning rape are very specific.

In the countries I listed, in order to report rape you must have a witness to the rape. There is no such thing as statutory rape in 99% of the cases brought before the courts. This is because the age of consent for all these countries is 9 years of age following with the wisdom that Aisha was 9 when she had sex with Muhammad. Only men whom prey on younger than 9 years of age and reported to the authorities are actually prosecuted but not necessarily punished.

What made me finally understand this problem was with the organization for human rights which has more than thirty thousand (30,000) reports and with more than 10,000 documented concerning this issue. The worst offending country in the world is Iran where the moral police accounts for more than 80% of rapes which are reported. However, these reports are not followed up by the authorities because the law states that the act of rape must be witnessed or the girl's family must report it if she is under 9 years of age before there is any investigation.

Generally most family members take revenge on the man who did the rape especially in cases of girls under 9 years of age and rarely report the crimes. Many murder cases refer to the rape of a family member as a defense against prosecution. The tragedy is that the girls are then victims of mercy killings for losing their virginity.

Because under the Shariah and Sunnah and laws which are made from them rape is an almost impossible charge to bring. In most cases, the women are charged with moral outrage if they do try to report the rape and generally this leads to the authorities bringing charges against the woman for being immoral or a prostitute. Once these charges are brought the victim of rape may be raped many times over again by local boys and men because the woman has already been charged with moral outrage and if the woman reports the rapes again generally this leads to more charges against the rape victim. See Lunina S. Pakistan 1991. Aina S. Iran 2004. Firdaus M. Bengal 2005. Makarim I. Saudi Arabia 2000. I could list thousands but you get the picture.

In the cases of Aina S. Iran 2004 and Firdaus M. Bengal 2005 and Makarim I. Saudi Arabia 2000 the women were put to death for moral outrage. The oldest girl was 13 and the youngest 10. These girls reported rape and their rapist were never even spoken to by the authorities. Instead, these girls were labled as moral outrage because they were unmarried and had lost their virginity. The authorites hung or beat to death these girls for simply being a victim of rape.

This is why in most countries women rarely report the crime of rape out of fear. You add to this issue the words of an out spoken religious men like Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali unveiled women are uncovered meat for men, Mufti in Copenhagen sparked a political outcry after publicly declaring that women who refuse to wear headscarves are "asking for rape." Arshad Misbahi Manchester's Central Mosque western women are for sexual release of muslim men, al-Rafee if I came across a rape crime, I would discipline the man and order that the woman be jailed for life. Why would you do this, Rafee? He said because if she had not left the meat uncovered, the cat wouldn’t have snatched it.

These views are taught in all muslim schools. These views are then spread across the world.

Facts that can not be ignored.

Compiled data between 2000 and 2004.

Norway 80% of rape crimes are by muslim immigrants. victims ages between 6 and 16.

Sweeden 78% of all rape crimes are by muslim immigrants or the muslim community. Rape gangs are known to be in force in many muslim lower class areas. most victims are under 14.

France 74% of rape victims were attacked by muslim men.

Holland 63% rape victims identified as muslim immigrants

Demark 85% rape victims raped by known muslim men most of which were immigrants victims ages are disturbingly low ranging from 4 to 15.

Britan 58% rape crimes involve muslim or Islamic followers

Germany 81% of rape victims were raped by muslim men most of which were immigrants.

Italy 52% of rape crimes were committed by muslim men.

USA According to the FBI 49% of all rape cases accross the US were committed by men who claim were muslim or known to belong to muslim prison gangs.

Australia 91% of rape cases where done by muslim men mostly immigants or visiting students.

Canada 52% of rape cases involve mulsim men.

Spain 86% of rape cases were by muslim men.

Another set of facts is that muslim immigrants increase crime in all countries they are in between 20 and 35%. This diffenece in the 15% is due to the differences in laws and punishments of the countries the immigrants are in. In other words, what is a crime in one country may not be in another.

The truth is that Islamic countries have extremely low morals and values concerning women and human rights to religious tolerance.

Most of the crimes in Europe are actually hate crimes motivated by religous jihad to try and change Europe to a Muslim world.

Jihad today asks muslims abroad to have as many children as possible and to get on welfare of the countries they are in. They want to become the majority in the countries to change the countries from Christian to Muslim by any means available. France is a good example where it is near civil war between Muslim and Christians and governmental polices.

So when I listen to muslims who try and say that rape and other high moral crimes are only a western issue. I say they are the greatest Liars of the world.

Facts are facts. Check out what I have written. Google if you want. You most likely will find most of what I have posted. However, call governments to check the facts of crime rates. They are what they are.

Muslims in general do not obey the laws of the land. They only obey those laws which they feel they want to obey.

Most Arabs are so racist, most Muslims are so intolerant, they just can't bring themselves to be grateful to the US for rescuing Iraqi Arab men, women & children from the butcher & torturer of Baghdad: Saddam Hussein.

There was not one shred of gratitude from any known Muslim leader or group for US & Europe's rescuing of Bosnian Muslims in the 1990's. anti west is still going strong instead

There was not one declaration of thank you from any known Muslim leader or organization for US saving of Somali Muslims in the 1990's. but on the contrary, their hatred only grew.

Did one [mainstream] single Muslim cleric come up and say that the Koranic term [reminder, only Islamists kill, torture in the name of religion & book] 'apes & pigs', the Islamists call the non Muslims, are not to be followed?

While [not only most Jews or even most Israelis, but even] most Zionist Jews sympathize with Arab 'Palestinian' fallen unintentionally in the war on terror, but almost all Arabs & Muslims demonize Israeli victims of intentional Arab-Muslims violent crimes against humanity.

While Arabs live in Israel not only just better & more free [women voting, real free speech, etc.] than in all of their own regimes, but treated often as first class citizens ahead of Israeli Jews (courts, land issues, etc.), Jews, however, are either not allowed to live in certain Arab countries [apartheid, ethnic cleansing, etc. Syria even denies any entry for a Jew,] or persecuted in most Arab countries.

Which Arab Muslim nation is exempt of the epidemic of criminal 'honor killing'?

If Pro terror Muslim organizations like CAIR [ http://anti-cair-net.org ] is defined as "moderate", what would one call their mainstream?

Roughly 90% of Arabs polled, have a negative view on all Jews [not just being 'anti-Zionism', whatever that means], even in such [so called 'moderate'] countries like: Jordan.

"White" Hitler's 'MeinKampf' is translated into Arabic, available on the "brown" Arab market, what for?

What's the interest in "brown" Arab nations' inviting "white" KKK members to speak?

Do you know of any Muslim group that has joined the efforts of Christian/Jewish action to prevent the racist genocide by Arab Muslims in Sudan upon native black Muslims?

Has any Arab media issued an apology for inciting the bloody "intifada" [2000] via lying images, such as of Muhammad Al dura, which as we all know by now, was killed by Arabs themselves [who knows how many more]? or has anyone of them run the true version of stories?

Which Arab, Muslim nation is exempt from the crime of libel against Israel's struggle for survival with outrageous drama "accusations" & horrific twisted around definitions in the UN [reaching it's peak with their racist resolution in Durban - 2000, hypocritically calling it "against racism"]?

How many Arabs, Muslims, have declared openly that the 'Palestinian' Arab Muslim cult of using it's kids as human bombs and as human shields in their war against Israeli civilians, is totally immoral?

Not one Muslim group has come up against and declared that a collective boycott of an entire nation such as Denmark (2006, because they were upset with a few cartoonists that happened to be Danes) is racism.

While most Arab, most Muslims couldn't care less what happens with the [so called] "Palestinian" Arab Muslims, they do use them as pawns in their fascist war [physical, propaganda, economic & in the UN] against the non Arab, non Muslim "island" in their neighborhood, i.e. Israel.

While Arab, Muslims leaders chased out, in 1948, most of the [so called] "Palestinian" refugees, with bragging "promises" of "victory" & ethnic cleansing the Jews out of Israel, they put them in camps, never let Israel to improve their conditions, so to use them as pawns in their fascist war against the non Arab, non Muslim "island" in their neighborhood, i.e. Israel.

Most Arab Muslim media draws Israel so vile, as in the WWII type of Nazi cartoon drive [the other unfunny ironic part is, they pick the non-Zionist Jew image, hypocrisy, again, fascism, again].

Most Muslims wishwash the facsistic Muslims' torture and cold blooded murder of innocent people that just happened to be Jewish, like: Daniel Pearl, Nick Berg, Ilan Halimi.

Did you hear one mainstream Arab Muslim leader or groups denuncing the Islamic Hitler of Iran's calls for annihilation of an entire nation, calling for a new Holocaust while denying the previous one and his calls for death to: US & the UK? [PS, he just made a tour (May-2006) among "moderate" Muslim nations that only cheered him on.
]

Exactly How many Muslims or Muslim organizations [that are so worry about their image or of their 'prophet's] have protested against the masses of Muslims on the 'Cartoon -Jihad' rampage (2006), calling Europe a cancer and threatening a "9/11" on Europe?

Not one of the few courageous Muslims that speak out for real overall reform, for disliking westerners, for sympathy for Israel the victim, for about [all] Muslims regimes' crimes on their own people, have been shielded from any major Muslim organization (including such as CAIR - http://anti-cair-net.org), from the menace of death threats Fatwas by Muslim clerics.

Disclaimer : Do not use this blog to call for any violence, to troll, or to post warez/porn.
If you are found to be abusing these rules (which can be updated at any time),
your posts will be removed from this site without warning. note -
I cannot be held responsible for anything written on this page that you disagree with.
If you don't like it, go somewhere else.