fyi, Tim Boland NIST
>X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>X-Original-To: www-qa@listhub.w3.org
>Delivered-To: www-qa@listhub.w3.org
>X-Sender: lofton@rockynet.com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
>Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:01:33 -0700
>To: www-qa@w3.org
>From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
>Subject: redesign of QA Framework
>X-Archived-At:
>http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20040315161542.027982b0@rockynet.com
>Resent-From: www-qa@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <www-qa@w3.org> archive/latest/1408
>X-Loop: www-qa@w3.org
>Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <www-qa.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-qa-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:58:40 -0500 (EST)
>X-MailScanner:
>X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
>X-MailScanner-From: www-qa-request@w3.org
>
>QA Interest Group --
>
>At our QAWG/IG face-to-face [1] during the Tech Plenary 2004, we have
>decided on a complete remodeling of the QA Framework (QAF). This follows
>our trial implementation experiences during CR, as well as comments and
>feedback from Working Groups and individuals.
>
>We have decided to go Lite and to redesign the whole QA Framework:
>
>* Ops Guidelines (combined with Introduction) will become a useful "QA
>Handbook", to help chairs and staff contacts manage and organize their
>WGs' quality practices.
>* Spec Guidelines will have a diet and become lighter: Spec GL Lite [2]
>* Test Guidelines will have a diet too and become lighter as well: Test GL
>Lite [3]
>
>Our goals in this redesign are to:
>
>- reduce the size, complexity, and perceived burden on scarce resources of
>the WGs;
>- make QAF more useful and usable by including lots more practical tools
>and examples;
>- make the language simpler and clearer;
>- synchronize the (Lite) QAF components at a common stage of usability and
>maturity.
>
>The QAF documents will go back at the WD stage. For this next phase, we
>will use the QA wiki [4] as a participation tool for other WGs or external
>people to participate and suggest tools or needs. We hope this will give
>more ongoing review and feedback, between our publishing milestones.
>
>In retrospect, the theoretical work that we have developed around the QAF
>in the past two years has nailed down a lot of important issues. It
>should provide a solid foundation for the new, lighter-weight QAF. The
>challenge now is to combine the best of that into "A Kinder, Gentler QA
>Framework", as it was described [5] at Technical Plenary.
>
>Regards,
>-Lofton
>(for QAWG)
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/03/f2f
>[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Mar/0028
>[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Mar/0015
>[4] http://esw.w3.org/topic/QaFramework
>[5] http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/tp2004-test-pc/