Dairy
farmers in Wisconsin have joined a man and his wife who are appealing
a judge's ruling that they don't have a fundamental right to own a dairy
cow or drink the unprocessed milk from their own cows.

Farmers
Mark and Petra Zinniker wished to sell raw milk obtained from their
cows through their new farm store. But a judgment in August from Wisconsin
Circuit Court Judge Patrick Fiedler ruled against them in what one
attorney characterized as a "bizarre judicial leap."

In
response, shareholders joined the Zinnikers and retained public-interest
lawyers from the Farm
to Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF) who had filed a motion for
Judge Fiedler to clarify his court decision.

What
shocked many Wisconsin residents -- and a growing number of Americans
across the nation -- is the fact that Judge Fiedler's ruling denies
the fundamental rights to food and farming. For example, he ruled that
the plaintiffs -- the Zinnikers -- don't have a fundamental right to
own and use a dairy cow or a dairy herd, in spite of their legally purchasing
the farm animals.

The
judge also ruled that the Zinnikers -- and Americans in general -- don't
have a fundamental right to drink the milk from their cow, and they
do not have a right to choose, produce and consume foods and liquids.

"Judge
Fiedler's bizarre, unreasonable and harsh court ruling on the rights
of farmers is likely to have a far greater effect, if it is allowed
to stand," said political strategist and attorney Mike Baker.
"Basically, that Wisconsin jurist is legislating from the bench
based on his own personal interpretation of the U.S. Constitution's
commerce clause," Baker said. He added that this case may be part
of a larger attempt by government officials to dictate what Americans
can and cannot consume.

"The
Nanny State is becoming more and more intrusive as politicians and black-robed
lawyers wish to decide what we can eat, how much we are allowed to eat,
and when we're allowed to eat," Baker noted.

Food
Control?

After
the massive Obamacare bill passed in 2010 giving the government control
of one-sixth (1/6) of the U.S economy, they immediately began the pattern
of creating a crisis, selling their remedy to the crisis and passing
legislation that doesn't alleviate the crisis, but gives lawmakers and
the President more power. That new crisis is obesity, according to several
political observers.

"First, we had the First Lady Michelle Obama speaking frequently
about childhood obesity, adult obesity, American obesity. The subtext
of her message is that Americans are overfed, fat slobs who needed to
be prodded away from the refrigerator," said Baker.

Then, according to the congressional record, after more than a year
of consideration, the U.S. Senate passed the U.S.
Food Safety Modernization Act by a vote of 73-25. That meant not
only did the Senate Democrats pass the bill but at least 20 Republicans
consented to yet another government takeover.

The bill passed in the House, then it was affirmed by the Senate Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee in November 2009. President
Barack Obama was more than happy to sign the bill into law since it
have his minions at the FDA more power which increased the power of
the Obama White House, noted Thomas Spence, a food and beverage industry
specialist, who served as a food and nutrition expert at the Department
of Justice during the Vietnam War.

"The "Act" gives even greater authority to the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) allowing the agency to hire additional
bureaucrats to conduct more frequent inspections at food processing
plants and assigns more governmental authority in recalling food,"
Spence said.

The
"Act" also requires food processing companies to register
with the FDA in order to detail their safety plans, and it allows the
FDA to create more food safety regulations. Moreover, it establishes
stricter standards on food safety. An intended or unintended consequence
is the rise in food prices as a result of increased production costs
necessary to comply with FDA regulations.

Advertisement

The
Centers for Disease Control
reports that tens of millions of Americans are made ill by food-borne
illnesses, resulting in thousands of deaths every year. In an effort
to prevent future outbreaks of such illnesses, the bill requires farmers
and food processors to declare to the Food and Drug Administration how
they are preparing the foods to keep them safe at various stages of
production, the magazine The New American reported.

However,
as noted by The
New American, "[T]he very culprit responsible for the food-borne
illnesses is the same one being assigned more power by the food safety
bill: the FDA.

The
FDA “has been the facilitator for hundreds of lethal and deadly
pharmaceuticals allowed into the markets that cause physical damage
and even death in thousands of cases.”

Despite
the massive increase in government influence the bill allows, it managed
to garner bipartisan support in Congress, and had the backing of President
Obama as well. The bill had 20 co-sponsors, eight of whom were Republicans.
The legislation also had the support of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
though the group did caution that the bill provides too much discretion
to federal regulators, according to Raven Clabough at the New American.

The
food safety bill is criticized as being unconstitutional. Raven Clabough
asserts that "the true focus of the bill, despite lawmakers’
assertions, is to eradicate family and independent producers, to corner
the agricultural markets, reducing competition, to force all food products
produced in the US into exports markets, and to criminalize land and
livestock ownership through the use of predatory licensing and regulation.”

Other
conservatives who believe in constitutional government have said that
The Food Safety Modernization Act, S. 510, represents a massive expansion
of government regulation of the food industry, even though there is
no authorization in the Constitution for this.

"My
right to produce, distribute, and consume the foods of my choice is
part of my right to life and liberty under the Constitution," said
Clabough.

American
Food Plan Linked to Globalism

Far
too many conservatives are failing to pay attention to the rise of global
socialism at the hands of the United Nations through its Agenda
21. It is easy to overlook world governance schemes when Americans
are inundated with information regarding local and national events.

Also,
the problem with the media coverage of this United Nations labyrinth
known as Agenda 21 is that it was created in 1992 and implemented in
incremental actions by the U.N. and its supporters in the U.S., E.U.,
and other countries whose populations are eager to benefit from the
work of others especially those enjoying success in the United States.

"The
overarching goal of Agenda 21 is to establish international norms of
personal behavior that are dictated by a group of the world’s
so-called ‘enlightened elite’ who believe they know best
how people ought to live therefore they should be allowed to tell the
how they should live," said GOP official Nathan Tabor of North
Carolina.

“But
make no mistake, even though Congress never approved the implementation
of Agenda 21 programs in education, economics, the environment and other
areas. Presidents as far back as George H.W. Bush have signed Executive
Orders allowing implementation of Agenda 21's programs,” said
Tabor, the author of the bestseller The
Beast on the East River, an expose of United Nations corruption
and evil.

In
fact, the U.N. has ignored the federal government and through its Agenda
21 International Council of Local Environmental Initiative and made
deals with local governments numbering upwards of 600 cities, towns
and villages.

To
understand how serious the left is about United Nations rule, look at
some of the proponents of Agenda 21: billionaire George Soros has provided
millions of dollars to ICLEI. Former Barack Obama czar Van Jones' Green
for All and the Tides
Foundations' Apollo Alliance are also reportedly ICLEI contributors,
according to a GOP and Tea Party leader.

“The
truth is, Agenda 21 promotes European socialism that by its nature will
infringe upon our freedoms and liberties. Most of its vague, lofty sounding
phrases cause the average person's eyes to glaze over, making it easier
to sneak into our communities,” warns Tabor, who has served as
chairman of the Forsyth County Republican Party in North Carolina and
is an activist within the Tea Party Movement.

Advertisement

"Besides
its radical environmental agenda, the U.N. wishes to change consumption
patterns, including food consumption, ownership of property and automobile
ownership, while successfully promoting social justice,"
said Tabor.

Starve
a People, Feed the World

What
may have seemed to be outrageous to most Americans regarding their own
government now appears to be more recognized as fact. For example, there
are growing suspicions that the United States government is seeking
to control the American population through bogus food safety programs
with the ultimate goal of deliberate starvation.

Before Glenn
Beck was booted from Fox News Channel -- where he had monumental
audience ratings -- he alleged that the government's interest in food
safety and fighting obesity "is about control and, in the end,
starvation,” Beck said.

Beck's
warning was the result of a Senate bill (S.510) that would give the
FDA additional authority to address so-called food safety. The bill
had received bipartisan support in response to the reported cases of
food recalls the past year (peanut butter, spinach, cookie dough, etc.)
due to pathogens like E.coli and salmonella that have sickened thousands
of Americans and led to dozens of deaths.

And
Glenn Beck isn't the only one sounding the alarm: Political commentator
Wayne
Allyn Root believed that Obama and the progressives are intentionally
overwhelming the system.

"BaracK
Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant.
He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S.
economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos
-- thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within,"
said Root.

Barack
Obama was Root's college classmate at Columbia University (Class of
'83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following
the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University
. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system
with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues.

"Taken
individually they're alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant,
Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist
state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for
survival ... and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government.
Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it," said Root.

He
points to Obamacare to make his point: The health care bill had very
little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing
millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000
to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions).

Obama
doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will
add trillions of dollars to the national debt, Root asserts. What he
does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million
voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary
would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a near depression?

Cap
and trade, like health care legislation having nothing to do with health
care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything
to do with redistribution of income, government control of the economy
and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest contributors.

Those
powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC,
MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants.
They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions
to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is
that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and
businesses helps Obama "spread the wealth around," said Root.

But
with all these theories regarding "food
control" the motive is what should disturb any American, whether
they are business owners or laborers: The goal of creating equality
on planet Earth.

After
decades and trillions of dollars to help poor nations -- especially
in Africa and Latin America -- progressives have finally realized that
throwing money at a problem will never solve that problem. No matter
what progressives attempted, they failed to bring these impoverished
countries' citizens up to the standard of living in the United States.

In
their obsession with creating their "even playing field" the
progressives have decided that if they couldn't raise the standard of
living within the "poor" nations, then in order to achieve
"social justice, they must drag the majority of Americans down
to the standard of living endured by citizens of Third-World
nations, said Mike Baker, attorney and conservative strategist.

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

"Of
course, the Obamas, Clintons, Gores and other rich progressives will
continue to enjoy their wealth while Americans stand in breadlines,
but they will feel justified that U.S. citizens are just as poverty-stricken
as the folks living in war-torn Africa," said Baker.

"When
the government controls the food and housing and health care, they control
the people. Get out of line and you'll be thrown into the streets to
starve. And don't think they wouldn't do it," Baker pointed out.

"I've
heard it said by his defenders that President Obama loves America. I
would say that while Obama may love America, he hates Americans."

Dairy farmers in
Wisconsin have joined a man and his wife who are appealing a judge's ruling
that they don't have a fundamental right to own a dairy cow or drink the
unprocessed milk from their own cows.