On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:35:06PM -0000, Tim Docker wrote:
> droundy:
> > Chart has rather a complicated API. I've written a simpler API (but
> > somewhat less flexible), if anyone's interested (Tim wasn't). My API is
> > closer in complexity (of use) to matlab's plotting.
>> I'd describe the API as verbose rather than complicated. It takes 5-10
> lines of haskell to define a chart - see the examples on the web page. I
> think this is fine for use within other code, but I agree is too much
> typing for interactive use.
Okay, verbose then. 5-10 lines to define a chart is 4-9 lines too many.
--
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University