Regular

Jaggies are more noticeable than on PS4 but maybe it's because of the lower resolution, still not sure yet.

Click to expand...

That is an interesting resolution. How do you calculate the horizontal? I have found plenty of info on the web about pixel counting the vertical, but very little for the other. You can PM me the details if you want I am very interested in learning.

VeteranRegular

That is an interesting resolution. How do you calculate the horizontal? I have found plenty of info on the web about pixel counting the vertical, but very little for the other. You can PM me the details if you want I am very interested in learning.

Yes, there are some moments that have a good amount of detail, most notably at slow-motion sections and when at terminals. When there's a lot of action, the game has motion blur and depth of field like crazy. My every much still in training eye says Full HD.

LegendVeteran

After trying to find some clear screenshot of aliasing, I have come to conclusion that almost all visible aliasing is down to the specular shader shimmer that ruins just a few surfaces per questionable shot. Rest of the game looks smooth.

Finding those shots was not a easy job, game is post processed as hell [but it looks awesome ].

ModeratorLegend

After trying to find some clear screenshot of aliasing, I have come to conclusion that almost all visible aliasing is down to the specular shader shimmer that ruins just a few surfaces per questionable shot.

Click to expand...

Pretty unfortunate, especially where the Bat tank is concerned. The footage earlier this year was pretty atrocious with the specular.

Regular

Question. When a game has a strange resolution like 1440x1080 on FC4 how does it upscale to 1080p without skewing the picture?

Click to expand...

Anamorphic buffers.

The image is rendered "squished" so that it looks correct once it's been "stretched" to the display ratio.

Whether it's correct to call this "squishing" and "stretching" is contextual/debatable/whatever, since there's nothing intrinsically "incorrect" about pixels being situated in screen-space on something other than a square grid.

Regular

The image is rendered "squished" so that it looks correct once it's been "stretched" to the display ratio.

Whether it's correct to call this "squishing" and "stretching" is contextual/debatable/whatever, since there's nothing intrinsically "incorrect" about pixels being situated in screen-space on something other than a square grid.

Veteran

Been playing FC4 and man the HRAA has so much temporal ghosting. It's no where near Halo Reach level but it happens everywhere on the screen since the world has so many moving objects (plus the player movement). The sharpness due to HRAA also hurts the image in my opinion. The game is pretty damn good at reducing jaggies but has an oversharpened look while having a blur due to ghosting which makes it look strange. I would still prefer Infamous' SMAA but I guess that is more expensive than HRAA.

About Us

Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!