It's not his personality that bugs me. It's that flabby arm and those tats. Dude needs a gym.

I know nothing about his personality since I never watch his show, but all of these YouTube reviewers come across as extremely stilted to me. If I were to do a show like this, I wouldn't just read my reviews verbatim. I'd try to make it appear more natural and spontaneous, which Stuckmann, Jahns, and the rest don't seem to care much about. I'm curious if this bugs anyone else.

Even a Ukrainian website gave it two stars, stating it was one of the worst spy thriller of recent years and had no redeeming qualities, leading to comments voicing the idea of getting them investigated by SBU (Ukrainian KGB).

Those were the apolitical websites as well. The opposition website (not the one I quoted above, but an older, more established one) demonstrated the kind of hysteria expected of them: the "review" begins by dedicating itself to the victims of Las Vegas shooting and "Russia is not a place for individualities and this film destroys individualities", and ends with "I didn't choose to be born (and I would have refused if I had the chance), but now that I'm here, I am ashamed to live here. Goodbye, reader. In all, a pretty good illustration why their favored candidate Sobchak got 1,5% in March, and why top pro-Kremlin commentator (who was deeply against Crimean reintegration up until it happened) can call like-minded people "2% of shit" without consequences.

Not only is this based on novels, but they are a trilogy too; moreover, Bill Clinton read them before writing his own terrible novel (The President Is Missing), which is itself going to become a TV series. This is just amazingly wrong.

Thankfully, it seems like this particular movie underperformed, so we probably won't see a sequel.

Not only is this based on novels, but they are a trilogy too; moreover, Bill Clinton read them before writing his own terrible novel (The President Is Missing), which is itself going to become a TV series. This is just amazingly wrong.

Thankfully, it seems like this particular movie underperformed, so we probably won't see a sequel.

I watched Red Sparrow and thought it was decent - nothing more, nothing less. However, it was one of those movies that I essentially forgot about within a day or two of watching it. I can't even remember if it was set up for a sequel or not. It really didn't leave any lasting impression whatsoever.