it is hard to say which is lying. the reported miles are different based on where the attestation appeared. who is to say which is more accurate? and if the bias of the answers have been consistent over time I agree that there is no reason to change anything - the measure is working fine.

__________________
Removed a dated athletic reference under pressure from a friend. You can still give money to help fund research on neurofibromatosis (nf).

My response as well. Just defraud the company for a new roof and donate $50 to habitat for humanity. Clear conscience.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kangaz wit Attitude

Force of habit, 2pac's been typing "88" a LOT since Trump got elected.

Spoiler:

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMO

You ought to see the bush. It's impressive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pikachu

10:53 pm: some ppl dont take advices well

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayo fan

9:45 pm: ao fan would be hot covered in mayo!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snikelfritz

if you'd like I can come visit and dress up like a girl and get in some fights

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaner3339

i think everyone needs to do this type of thing to get a dose of reality and straighten people up. it's kinda like going to the mountains and becoming a monk except it's with hundreds of potatoes and a lot of stoners with tattoos in a kitchen

Each year, any money leftover from the insurance policy (called the “underwriting profit” in industry terms) is donated to a cause during what Lemonade calls its annual “giveback” period.

Quote:

And it’s making its money in a pretty traditional way — by taking a 20% cut of all of the money paid into policies.

If they are making any money off of the 20% cut, it is by definition, part of the underwriting profit. It seems that they've conveniently redefined the terms to exclude the profit they plan to make.

The alternative is that they are taking a 20% commission and not assuming any of the risks of loss... but then they wouldn't be able to guarantee that any of the "underwriting profit" gets donated to charities.

And there already is a mechanism to return profit to the consumers...it's called policyholder dividends.

If they are making any money off of the 20% cut, it is by definition, part of the underwriting profit. It seems that they've conveniently redefined the terms to exclude the profit they plan to make.

The alternative is that they are taking a 20% commission and not assuming any of the risks of loss... but then they wouldn't be able to guarantee that any of the "underwriting profit" gets donated to charities.

And there already is a mechanism to return profit to the consumers...it's called policyholder dividends.

shh. you'll blow up their spot.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kangaz wit Attitude

Force of habit, 2pac's been typing "88" a LOT since Trump got elected.

Spoiler:

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMO

You ought to see the bush. It's impressive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pikachu

10:53 pm: some ppl dont take advices well

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayo fan

9:45 pm: ao fan would be hot covered in mayo!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snikelfritz

if you'd like I can come visit and dress up like a girl and get in some fights

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaner3339

i think everyone needs to do this type of thing to get a dose of reality and straighten people up. it's kinda like going to the mountains and becoming a monk except it's with hundreds of potatoes and a lot of stoners with tattoos in a kitchen