If one’s religion teaches that abortion is murder, is the believer then obligated to stop abortions from happening, by any means necessary? Today, a Kansas judge decided that this is not a viable defense strategy under the law. On May 31, Kansas resident Scott Roeder is accused of shooting and killing Dr. George Tiller.

Roeder had wished to use something that has been termed the “necessity defense,” which would justify using lethal force. Although the judge’s reasoning for not allowing the defense is not spelled out, a guess would be that it would open the door for other potential killers to use such a defense. Also this week, an Oklahoma judge temporarily blocked the implementation of a new law that would require women to answer a number of demographic and relationship questions, the answers to which would be posted on a publicly-accessible website. Critics argue that, while the information is ostensibly anonymous, those living in small towns could be identified.

It is becoming increasingly difficult for anti-abortion advocates to use laws to advance their agendas. With the separation of church and state in the U.S., they must use other tactics. In the murder case, the judge likely did not wish to set a pro-murder precedent. In the Oklahoma case, the information was supposedly going to be used to identify those populations at risk for unwanted pregnancies. Yet anyone familiar with ethical social science methodologies would never gather information that would cause potential harm to human subjects (in this case, identification and negative outcomes that could result).

Read More

Unraveling Religious Worldviews: The Relationship between Images of God and Political Ideology in a Cross-Cultural Analysis by Paul Froese and Christopher Bader

Comments 4

Tweets that mention Religion, Abortion, and the Law in the United States » Sociology Lens -- Topsy.com — December 22, 2009

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Compass Journals and Sociology Lens, John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons said: SociologyLens: New Post: Religion, Abortion, and the Law in the United States http://ow.ly/16crEx http://ow.ly/16ctkP [...]

Keri — December 27, 2009

I wonder if it is the separation of church and state that is making it necessary for anti-abortion activists to engage outside the legal structure? It seems that gender equality, health awareness, and even class related issues might be arising as well. The topic surely is not becoming less contentious, but the pattern of outcomes you identify suggest some kind of change might be in store.

Nickie Wild — January 4, 2010

Keri- I think that your comment about the separation of church and state is a correct one. The alternative tactics are hard to come up with, since science-based approaches have to be, well, science-based.

About Sociology Lens

Sociology Lens is the associated site for Sociology Compass, Wiley-Blackwell’s review journal on all fields sociological. On this site we host daily posts, video files and news items from our team of contributors. Read more…