@J2e2c
I really don't post on here, nor do I claim to be an amazing writer, but I agree that this review sounds "retarded". It is so ridiculously contrived, it reminds me of my promiscuous thesaurus usage in college essays. It's not that you seem unintelligent... it's that the overall impression your writing portrays is that of a pretentious fencer/poet at a renaissance fair who's mama has convinced himself he's quite the stud (among non-studs). While you might be able to score yourself an abundant amount of dinner plate nippled ladies, you have failed at providing a concise, easily readable and understandable review.

My review is like an ever-stimulating pool of thought, clearly you have travelled far and as this is your first comment it appears that you have found what you are looking for. I am glad to be of service, although if I neglect the trolls in favour of you, they will grow restless and hungry... such is their nature though -- it's what keeps them going! The king always throws out scraps to the poor. Still, your comment is a nice break from all of that. Was an amusing read! :-)

Well, tough luck jerk. Go find someone else to bully. Besides, people as retarded as yourself shouldn't be telling me what to think. Did I mention that I am now finding this enjoyable? Even if I am acting like an idiot, it's all just to fit in to this environment that you seem to fit well into yourself... of course, that's only temporary.. I realize that in the long run it will numb my brain.

Well then, by that logic... the fact that you're acknowledging that anonymous people you'll never meet are 'pretentious assholes' speaks volumes in itself. Why don't you enlighten me with some of your fears now, huh?

You didn't do anything at all, you just avoided my comment which basically means there was no logic at all, otherwise you would have furthered it. Don't even attempt to make out that you have some edge over me here. At least I gave you the benefit of the doubt which was that there must have been some logic to it besides a dull assumption.

My logic is not yours, it is my own. I do however see that your statement was pretentious, so how could it be one of your fears? Of course my logic goes way beyond that but I shouldn't share it with the likes of you.

I cannot help that you are too stupid to figure this out. If you wish to make lots of 'noise' to make it seem as though you have an upper hand, do as you please. Anybody with a brain would realize that Stokes has simply employed yet another one of his simple tricks; pretending that I am missing something when in fact I am not, and then not explaining it and simply demanding that I work for his approval. Of course I'm not really interested in him, and he has demonstrated that as all intelligent thoughts have now gone out of the window, the only option left is to ignore him and let you think that you have somehow won some small victory. Because that's what idiots always do; they speak nonsense and they believe nonsense, then they make noises like animals to finally turn it into something more than a verbal dispute. This is like the lead up to a savage war.

It simply isn't allowed for a*holes to score a victory, which basically means he didn't. I know this because it was a farcical victory if indeed it was one. What he did succeed at doing is diverting the attention to himself and creating more nonsense to spiral these comments out of control. What was the point of that? Because he's an a*hole. There usually is no point.