“Climate Science” in Shambles; astounding Fraud

“Climate Science” in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda

It is the best of times, it is the worst of times — for science. Over
the past several years, the world has been spectator to an alarming
meltdown as one serious scandal after another has publicly exposed many
of the world’s most prestigious scientific organizations, institutions,
and publications as being captives of rigid ideologues who employ rigged
computer models, fraudulent “evidence,” censorship, and intimidation to
advance a radical “green” political agenda and to squelch genuine
scientific inquiry and debate.

Some of the preeminent scientists
involved in promoting global-warming alarmism have been disgraced and
discredited, after being caught in flagrante in unethical and
illegal activities. Even before the 2009 “Climategate” e-mail scandal,
many leading scientists who had earlier been true believers in man-made
global warming (anthropogenic global warming, or AGW) had begun jumping
ship and joining the AGW skeptic side. Since then, the defections have
turned into a veritable flood, making this one of the great untold
stories of the major establishment media, which continue to trumpet the
alarmist propaganda.

He talks of the defection of James Lovelock covered by this blog HERE.

“We rushed into renewable energy without any thought,” says Lovelock.
“The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant.” He has
upset many of his erstwhile green brethren for attacking wind turbines
and wind farms as “ugly and useless.”

Also he describes the defection of Professor Fritz Vahrenholt as "another green heretic." See HERE.

“For many years, I was an active supporter of the IPCC and its CO2 theory,” Vahrenholt wrote in the Telegraph.
“Recent experience with the UN’s climate panel, however, forced me to
reassess my position. In February 2010, I was invited as a reviewer for
the IPCC report on renewable energy. I realised that the drafting of the
report was done in anything but a scientific manner. The report was
littered with errors and a member of Greenpeace edited the final
version. These developments shocked me. I thought, if such things can
happen in this report, then they might happen in other IPCC reports
too.”

The AGW consensus scam is one of the most astounding frauds in all of
history, not only because it is patently false, but also because it is
being used to propel the most sweeping and authoritarian scheme for
global economic, social, and political regimentation the world has ever
seen.

Popular Posts

This alarmist propaganda goes against the real data. Penn State Professor Michael Mann has made similar claims of modern temperatures being the warmest, but such “Hockey Stick” temperature claims have been demolished in the scientific literature.

Opinion by Anthony Cox
I wrote before about the ABC’s bias and the real
cost of the ABC to the Australian community. Since then the Abbott
government has announced reasonable budget cuts but the ABC has sunk further
into its betrayal of its Charter and of the Australian community.
In a recent poll about the farcical China/US deal about
emissions the ABC’s The Drum initially showed this result: 12/11/2014: China and the US have struck a new deal to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Do you think Australia will need to adjust its climate change policies as a result? No 55% Yes 44% Unsure 1%

15205 votes counted
Given the ABC’s Left/Green readership a remarkable result.
However shortly the result
was changed to this: 12/11/2014: China and the US have struck a new deal to limit greenhouse gas
emissions. Do you think Australia will need to adjust its climate change
policies as a result?Yes 76% No 23% Unsure 1% 6001
votes counted
How could you trust an organisation which lies like that and
distorts public …