When I was at the Vegas Khan in 2011 the list was strikingly similar. Although Nemesis was lower on the list. Maybe audience vitriol has softened over the years for that film or maybe in a post TDKR (Rises) Tom Hardy's performance is swinging fan opinions. Star Trek 2009 ranked somewhere in the middle i think.

Rating STiD so low reeks of that "get off my lawn" mentality as it relates to having Khan in this movie, and probably the immensely false perception that this is somehow a rip off of TWOK when approximately 5-8 minutes of this two hour film really focuses on anything from TWOK.

I say this only because the 2009 film was ranked better.

Either way they are a tiny minority. 87% of critics liked it with 242 reviews and according to RT 91% of the RT members like it as well with well over 200,000 reviews.

Rating STiD so low reeks of that "get off my lawn" mentality as it relates to having Khan in this movie, and probably the immensely false perception that this is somehow a rip off of TWOK when approximately 5-8 minutes of this two hour film really focuses on anything from TWOK.

I sawy this only because the 2009 film was ranked better.

Either way they are a tiny minority. 87% of critics liked it with 242 reviews and according to RT 91% of the RT members like it as well with well over 200,000 reviews.

Rating STiD so low reeks of that "get off my lawn" mentality as it relates to having Khan in this movie, and probably the immensely false perception that this is somehow a rip off of TWOK when approximately 5-8 minutes of this two hour film really focuses on anything from TWOK.

I sawy this only because the 2009 film was ranked better.

Either way they are a tiny minority. 87% of critics liked it with 242 reviews and according to RT 91% of the RT members like it as well with well over 200,000 reviews.

Rating STiD so low reeks of that "get off my lawn" mentality as it relates to having Khan in this movie, and probably the immensely false perception that this is somehow a rip off of TWOK when approximately 5-8 minutes of this two hour film really focuses on anything from TWOK.

Click to expand...

Or, if I can offer a simpler explanation, fans rate it low simply because they didn't like the movie. It doesn't require any deep psychological analysis; it really is that simple.

Rating STiD so low reeks of that "get off my lawn" mentality as it relates to having Khan in this movie, and probably the immensely false perception that this is somehow a rip off of TWOK when approximately 5-8 minutes of this two hour film really focuses on anything from TWOK.

Click to expand...

Or, if I can offer a simpler explanation, fans rate it low simply because they didn't like the movie. It doesn't require any deep psychological analysis; it really is that simple.

Click to expand...

What I said simply comes from observations of what a TON of people who have disliked the movie has said.

I find it misinformed. I've lost count of the times I've read that ID is a remake of WOK or how many times I have had friends message me and ask if they should see it because they hear it was just a WOK remake.

If people want to say they dislike it for using a moment from a previous movie in this new universe that is up to them for sure. But my experience has been what I posted about.