]]>
Comment on How Richard’s scoliosis might be treated today by Glenis Brindley https://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/2019/01/20/how-richards-scoliosis-might-be-treated-today/comment-page-1/#comment-10173
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:15:44 +0000http://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/?p=31044#comment-10173As my daughter was diagnosed with this condition at 11 years old, I found this article really interesting. It sounds far less invasive, and nowhere near as traumatic as the original operation of putting rods down the length of the spine. Recovery time is so much better too. The wonders of modern medicine, how fortunate are we? x

]]>
Comment on Richard’s Back Now! by How Richard’s scoliosis might be treated today | murreyandblue https://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/2015/08/25/richards-back-now/comment-page-1/#comment-10165
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0000http://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/?p=2934#comment-10165[…] was interesting, but even more intriguing was the way it was treated. Scoliosis is usually treated by inserting metal rods each side of the spine. The operation is very invasive, […]

]]>
Comment on Richard III wasn’t the only dog to be given a bad name…. by viscountessw https://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/2019/01/16/richard-iii-wasnt-the-only-dog-to-be-given-a-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-10163
Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:35 +0000http://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/?p=31304#comment-10163Why would it not be the right Holand? Holand himself was Earl of Huntingdon, and therefore his wife was his countess. Joan was Countess of Hereford.

]]>
Comment on Richard III wasn’t the only dog to be given a bad name…. by red squirrel https://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/2019/01/16/richard-iii-wasnt-the-only-dog-to-be-given-a-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-10162
Sat, 19 Jan 2019 16:10:20 +0000http://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/?p=31304#comment-10162Are you sure you have the right Holland here? I was under the impression that after being called out as one of the Epiphany Rising plotters, John Holland was captured near Pleshey and taken into the custody of Joan (née Fitzalan) Countess of Huntingdon. Having not forgotten that her brother Richard Earl of Arundel, one of the Lords Appellant, was led to the block by Holland, the countess had him beheaded at Pleshey Castle, after summoning her brother’s children to witness the spectacle, but without actually informing Henry IV or getting his blessing.

]]>
Comment on And now for the height and appearance of Edmund, Earl of Rutland…. by Emőke Kovács https://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/2017/05/22/and-now-for-the-height-and-appearance-of-edmund-earl-of-rutland/comment-page-1/#comment-10158
Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:26:38 +0000http://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/?p=20375#comment-10158This number of mistakes would probably be worth a thorough correction of the article itself. I have always been fascinated by anything Plantagenet (and of course Lancaster and York), and I was googling Edmund of Langley’s (1st Duke of York) appearance, when I got here and read the article. I had to double-check all the genealogical facts because at first I didn’t suppose the 2nd paragraph of a serious article can be so wrong. BTW I’m still looking for info about the said Edmund’s appearance :).

]]>
Comment on Richard III wasn’t the only dog to be given a bad name…. by ladychaol https://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/2019/01/16/richard-iii-wasnt-the-only-dog-to-be-given-a-bad-name/comment-page-1/#comment-10155
Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:06:53 +0000http://murreyandblue.wordpress.com/?p=31304#comment-10155Fantastic post and so interesting!