WHITE HOUSE: Obamacare Actually Won In Federal Court Todayhttp://www.businessinsider.com/obamacare-subsidies-decisions-halbig-dc-circuit-2014-7/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Sun, 18 Feb 2018 01:06:49 -0500Brett LoGiuratohttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cfeaa3eab8ea2f66da790aNot quiteWed, 23 Jul 2014 13:02:27 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cfeaa3eab8ea2f66da790a
That would make that portion of the law ineffective only in that one particular court's jurisdiction, not the entire country. Plus, federal laws are often held to be constitutional in some circuits and unconstitutional in others, and usually continue to be enforced until a more consistent determination is available (usually from the Supreme Court).http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cfe33ceab8ea2143da790dHow the law worksWed, 23 Jul 2014 12:30:52 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cfe33ceab8ea2143da790d
Quick Law 101 primer for you:
Courts do not just look at the plain language of the law when they have to interpret a statute. They recognize that humans are fallible, and sometimes slight errors are made and overlooked; and that legislatures are not able to foresee and accommodate every single possible application of a law in the real world. That's why they also look at underlying evidence, such as the legislature's intent, in order to determine the most appropriate way of interpreting and enforcing the law.
In this case, a clear error was made that is obviously completely out of whack with the legislature's stated and recorded intent. Reasonable people can disagree on how courts will ultimately rule, but to think that the analysis of the law is as simple as you make it out to be was a legal rookie joke by you.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cfb331eab8ea8f01da7908DarrenWed, 23 Jul 2014 09:05:53 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cfb331eab8ea8f01da7908
I hate to break it to the White House, but that's not the way the judiciary works. You can have 35 courts uphold a part of a law and only ONE court strike it down, and it is thereby illegal until a higher court gives a ruling. The Obama Administration can't just cherry pick decisions they like and call all others "partisan" because in actuality, it doesn't matter. Once a court has come out against you, there's nothing you can do about it other than appeal.
This ignoring the law when it doesn't suit you is unbefitting of the Executive Branch, and I really hope somebody smacks them down for this.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cf940b6da811fc39089522milton friedmanWed, 23 Jul 2014 06:52:59 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cf940b6da811fc39089522
It was in black and white. The federal government cannot subsidize health insurance premiums in 36 states. Bye bye Obamacare....To even insinuate intent to override the law was a legal rookie joke by Obama.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cefd606da811aa678b4568Bob DoneverTue, 22 Jul 2014 20:10:08 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cefd606da811aa678b4568
Out of chaos, comes order. Obama's main objective in everything he does is to manifest chaos. This is the goal of the ruling Masons in America.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cef6e36bb3f7b36443085dhahahahaTue, 22 Jul 2014 19:42:27 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cef6e36bb3f7b36443085d
It's funny that someone who would use the name of a famous economist has no idea what "socialized" means.
Here's a hint: a program that uses private insurers to reimburse private physicians at privately negotiated rates for privately provided services, while charging its customers the price of its choice on an open, competitive market, with no government-run insurer available in that market, is not a socialized medicine program.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cef307ecad049c2cfd0cbaYou keep saying that, but it doesn't make it any more trueTue, 22 Jul 2014 19:25:59 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cef307ecad049c2cfd0cba
Filling vacant seats with like-minded judges is not "stacking" the court; it is one of the most important benefits of winning a presidential election.
Adding seats to an already full court, in order to sway the view of that court towards one's opinions, would be "stacking."
Obama filled vacant seats. That's it. That's not stacking, that's his job.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ceef89eab8ead20f9206f5AlexandraTue, 22 Jul 2014 19:11:05 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ceef89eab8ead20f9206f5
And Republicans threatened to do it, why? (Spoiler: To stack the Federal Courts of Appeals with wingnuts who will frustrate Congressional attempts to rein in Bush's czars).http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cee54c6bb3f79271430858The No Spin ZoneTue, 22 Jul 2014 18:27:24 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cee54c6bb3f79271430858
WHITE HOUSE: Obamacare Actually Won In Federal Court Today ...
KREMLIN: Ukraine Actually Shot Down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
(filed under: Things We Don't Believe)http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ced8e1eab8ea2d319206f5Texaco HourTue, 22 Jul 2014 17:34:25 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ced8e1eab8ea2d319206f5
Uncle Milty has finally gone out of his mind.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ced074ecad04c00cfd0cbamilton friedmanTue, 22 Jul 2014 16:58:28 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ced074ecad04c00cfd0cba
Scotus will decided the fate of the flawed socialized medicine program. Kagen will have to recuse herself due to conflicts of interests. Obamacare is finally dead....http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ceca706da811b4697ae418Ooooooh!Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:32:48 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53ceca706da811b4697ae418
Ooooooh, "leftists" and "czars".
Baggers be mad.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cec9b6eab8eaa37c776d7bJim in AlabamaTue, 22 Jul 2014 16:29:42 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cec9b6eab8eaa37c776d7b
You know I can see some partisan moves in congress heck even the president but judges? I mean the law is the law as written, they need to call it as it is not as how they want it to be or recuse because they do not agree with it. SOMEBODY in the government please start looking after the people who elect you.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cec5cc6da811b9507ae421Duh2.mdfTue, 22 Jul 2014 16:13:00 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cec5cc6da811b9507ae421
And, this my friends, is why Reid eliminated cloture votes for judicial nominees - to stack the Federal Court of Appeals with leftists who will frustrate Congressional attempts to rein in the czar.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cec4f8ecad04fa680e23e4Korda GyorgyTue, 22 Jul 2014 16:09:28 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53cec4f8ecad04fa680e23e4
Classic doublespeak. Baghdad Bob must be proud.