That
was the panel filled with publicity the reader faced when looking for
their seats and would look at until the show started.

The only
difference here is that the spectator was unaware that the show had
already started: Sutton saying that Operation Grange was biased and had
as its only objective proving Kate, Gerry and the other Tapas were innocent.

The
spectator looked at the panel and liked what it was seeing. The main
centre advert was in big bold letters, GRANGE BIASED TO BENEFIT THE McCANNS.

This holds promise, everyone thought.

3. The short feature

On
May 3rd we woke up with the Sutton news, and we smiled. But by noon we were grinning, when the curtains closed and reopened again so
the short feature would start.

The title of that short feature was called “My name is Bilton, Richard Bilton… licenced to please you”.

“There
were strange moments. I was offered a deal by supporters of the
McCanns. If I spied on the press pack, and passed on any stories I heard
about the first suspect, Robert Murat, I’d be given leads from inside
the camp. I declined.The McCann family have said they knew
nothing about it. I recently told Robert Murat, who’s long since been
cleared. He seemed genuinely upset.”

This
together with the Sutton piece on the day of the 10th anniversary had the spectators on the edges of their seats waiting anxiously for the Panorama
programme that night.

“The
film [The Meaning of Life] begins with the short film The Crimson
Permanent Assurance, where a group of elderly office clerks work in a
small accounting firm. They rebel against yuppie corporate masters,
transform their office into a pirate ship, and raid a large financial
district. The rest of the film is split into seven chapters made up of
distinct sketches.”

‘Bilton’s
short feature’ was like “The Crimson Permanent Assurance” because it
returns during the main feature, in one of its seven sketches the “Live
Organ Transplants”

From Wikipedia about that particular sketch:

“"Live Organ Transplants"
involves two paramedics visiting Mr. Brown, a card-carrying organ donor,
forcefully removing his liver whilst he is still alive. Brown's mother
speaks with a musician who performs "Galaxy Song" while discussing man's
insignificance in the universe. The Crimson Permanent Assurance return
to invade a corporate boardroom discussing the meaning of life, but a
tumbling skyscraper ends their assault”

The Bilton the spy story also returns into the ‘main feature’, the Panorama programme.

At 29:08, Bilton dramatically reveals:

“Through
their lawyers the McCanns told us they were not any party of
intimidation or targeting. They also say that they didn’t know anything
about a deal that was put to me by one of their supporters “I was
offered exclusive access to any new developments in the case, an inside
track on any new breakthrough, but there was a price, I was expected to
act as a spy, within the press pack.””

Follows this dialogue between him and Robert Murat:

Bilton:
“I said to you before the interview that there was a thing was I was
going to tell that which have never told you before, during that period I
was offered a deal by someone inside the McCann camp, not the family,
and they said they would give me access to lines from the inquiry, new
stories, if I reported back on what the press pack was saying about you…”Murat: “Right, ok”Bilton: “I mean I turned them down… what do you think about that?”Murat:
“That would make me incredibly angry, again, because again, they’ve
taken the focus away from trying to get to the bottom of this, find
actually what happened and trying to put the full focus on somebody else
and it’s… it’s incredulous…”

4. The movie critics

Before
we ‘criticise’ the main feature, the show had just finished and
the reviews were already in the press: The Daily Mail at May 3 at
23:45 and the Mirror at May 4 2017 at 00:53.

And guess what they decided to highlight? The fact that Bilton had just blown the whistle on the McCanns!

“- Ten years ago today Maddie McCann vanished from apartment on Praia de Luz- Richard Bilton claims McCanns' investigators offered him 'exclusive inside track'- Claims they wanted him to spy on press pack opinion on 'arguido' Robert Murat- Murat, who said accusation destroyed his life, was 'incredibly angry' at the offer”

And inside:

“A
BBC reporter claims he was offered exclusive access to the McCanns'
team if he agreed to spy on the press pack for their investigators.Richard
Bilton, who covered the disappearance in 2007, said investigators hired
by the family offered him the deal because they wanted information on a
suspect.They asked him to find out what other journalists were
saying about Robert Murat, who was later cleared by police but since
said the accusation alone 'destroyed my life'.Speaking on
Madeleine McCann: 10 Years On, Mr Bilton asked Mr Murat how he felt
about the offer for an 'exclusive inside track' he said was made to him.'That
would make me incredibly angry because again you have taken the focus
away from trying to get to the bottom of this and what actually happened
and trying to put the focus on someone else,' Mr Murat replied.”

“A BBC reporter has revealed "somebody inside the McCann camp" offered him a deal to act as a spy.Richard
Bilton confessed to Robert Murat, a "person of interest" in the
disappearance of Madeleine McCann, that he was asked to operate covertly
within the press pack.Mr Murat, who helped police with
translation before being made an official suspect, admitted he felt
"incredibly angry" at the revelation.The Panorama presenter said
private detectives put people under cover in the Ocean Club in Portugal
and he was offered "exclusive access" to new developments at a price.”

5. Sutton’s success

No
doubt about it, or so it seemed. Sutton and Bilton were clearly showing
that the walls around the McCanns were indeed crumbling.

Only
they did not only NOT show that as what they did show was the exact
opposite: that the walls of the other side as strong, solid, ready to
resist and to continue fighting.

To understand that one has to understand what was Sutton’s main mission: to prepare the ground for Bilton.

Both
Sutton and Bilton could have spoken before the 3rd but both chose that
proximity to the airing of the Panorama programme to give the audience
‘already seated in the theatre’ the feeling those walls were really
crumbling down around the McCanns.

After Bilton followed Sutton,
whatever he, Bilton, would show in the Panorama programme would have a margin of manoeuvre
that no one has ever held to distort truth.

And Bilton took it.

Sutton
was so successful that after Bilton showed a devilishly biased product
everyone was saying at the end that they thought it was a rather
balanced piece because it showed the blood and cadaver dogs, and even
them alerting to the Renault Scenic.

But, as we will see, it was balanced as cubic yard of solid steel against a cubic yard of cotton candy.

Remember,
that one article that everyone got excited about because it mentioned
that blood had been found in the apartment, that Gerry had been
recognised by Martin Smith and that Kate’s fingerprints were found on
the shutters?

That same article that then concluded that it had
been determined the blood was not even human, that Martin Smith was not
wearing glasses and that Kate’s fingerprints didn’t mean any
wrongdoing?

The Panorama programme did the exact same thing.

The
difference?

One, was that we were much more hypnotised beforehand by Sutton and
Bilton, and two, the human being retains the written
word much more than we do with moving images.

With moving pictures we can get away with little tricks we cannot do when we commit ourselves to words on paper.

Just
an example, in the introductory images Bilton says he was able to find
the man that the British police have spoken with, and the images show
him walking towards a door and then showing a man, Mr Ribeiro.

Later in
the documentary we will see that the door has absolutely nothing to do
with Mr Ribeiro, or with the only other Portuguese man – outside Pedro
do Carmo from the PJ – we got to speak with.

So why show that
door when saying “we were able to find the man…”? Simple answer, it
gives the illusion of successful reporting when indeed it was nothing but a dud.

7. The beginning

The thing starts with some introductory images, like the one with Bilton walking to the door.

We would like to highlight what he says at 03.35:

“The judges
pointed out that the McCanns hadn't been found innocent. Rather the case
had been shelved because the police hadn't been able to gather
sufficient evidence to the contrary.”

“The
McCanns hadn't been found innocent” is a phrase that gave the viewer a
sense of confidence and that finally some truthful things were about to
be shown.

But as the show went on we will see that important phrase
is something Bilton speciously, and sometimes even blatantly, forgets he
has said it.

Probably hoping the viewers had also because what memory
retains is the last thing said/shown about a subject.

The
show really kicks off at 06:46 when Bilton says “The fact is two police
forces from two countries came up with two different conclusions and
both contradict each other”.

Unless he’s talking about the
Malaysian and the Swiss police, or about police from any other
countries in the world besides Portugal and the UK, then he starts off
the programme with two lies.

First, neither police have concluded
anything because, as far as we know, both countries have open processes
on the case. That alone calls him a liar.

The Portuguese police
came to an intermediary conclusion in September 2007, which pointed
towards Maddie having died in the apartment and to the guilt of the
parents in simulating a kidnapping and of disposing of the body.

The public ministry did not disagree with this and determined that the investigation was to be continued.

After
months of facing resistance from the UK and seeing the FSS do
a U-turn on what it had initially said and come up with a specious report,
the PJ handed the report to the public ministry not denying, thus
maintaining, their September 2007 convictions but pointing out that little
progress had been made since then and they were not foreseeing any
progress being possible in the near future.

The public
ministry found that the evidence presented to substantiate the PJ’s
conviction was not enough to charge any of the arguidos and so took the
decision to archive the process, to be reopened in case new evidence
should arise.

The case was reopened in 2013 by the PJ and it hasn’t reached any conclusion as far as we know.

About the
British police, well we are all anxious to know what it will conclude
after 6 years and tens of millions of pounds of public money later and lately
with some “compelling evidence” and a “key-witness”, which together the
Home Office and Whitehall found worth investing £185,000 on.

And after these two lies he continues the falsities:

“Tonight we will show you the two theories and why both have failed to solve this mystery”

As
we will see, the first, about the PJ’s conviction he indeed does his best to
call it a failure and about the British investigation he simply proposes that one theory –
the bungled burglary – which only the British media has publicised but that as far as we
know the Met has never assumed as official, will be their conclusion.

If it is we have many questions to ask, then.

8. The curtains

Here Bilton starts “DailyMailing” by showing how the evidence seems to be damning to the McCanns:

At 8.06 Clarence Mitchell says:

“She [Kate] then opened the door, looked in and in the darkness didn't
immediately realise that Madeleine wasn't there. She realised the
curtains were flapping and the window to the street was open, which is
not how they left it. They'd left the shutters down and the window
closed.”

And to illustrate the above, the following images:

No
flapping curtains, no open windows, shutters down and very strangely in
the supposed panic someone had tucked the left curtain between the
wall and the bed.

9. The bars on the window

Bilton seems to be obsessed with the bars of the window Maddie is supposed to have been taken through:

However,
he’s very careful – and we’ll pretend we wonder why – not to show that
the other ground floor windows of the same building are without bars:

And if one browses through the streets of Luz on Google maps one is able
to see that the town has very few barred ground floor windows.

The “kidnapping of Maddie” didn’t frighten the town, everyone knows it’s an hoax, nowhere near representing any sort of threat.

10. Mr Amaral’s first appearance

At
09.40, Mr Amaral tells Bilton “I could give you all the clues that
showed there weren’t signs of someone breaking into the that apartment, I
would tell that there’s no evidence that apartment was broken into,
that the window Kate McCann tells the police it was open is a
simulation, that there isn’t, in terms of kidnap, or possibility of
abduction is materially impossible.”

Bilton continues,
“detectives also had doubts about the accounts of the groups account of
the night, the police didn’t believe the McCanns timelines, there were
inconsistencies they say in the way the group at the restaurant
described the events that night, like the time they went up and down to
check on their children, the police didn’t pull their punches.”

Bilton even highlights where in the PJ report it is said that the group’s statements have inconsistencies between them.

This is very important because it shows Bilton has read the files attentively.

11. When Brits are British

About the McCanns and or/T7 having called the media, 11.21:

Mitchell:
“(snickers) The Portuguese police advice was, quote “no media, no
media”. That might be the Portuguese way but it ain’t certainly isn't
the British way or the Western European way.”Bilton: “Why would the McCanns feel they know more than the police force?”Mitchell:
“Richard, by midnight, one a.m. the British media were being alerted and
the British media were beginning to make relevant inquiry. Now, there's
nothing wrong. I would do the same if I felt my child was missing and
the police officer in front of me was not really wanting to move heaven
and earth to get them back.”

For starters, this puts an end to
the debate of whether the McCanns called the media before midnight that
night, as their official spokesman has just recognised they did.

Being
very politically incorrect it is quite ironic see how the citizens of a
country who when they immigrate – they are not called immigrants but
ex-pats – create “little Britains” wherever they settle and in some
cases, like in some places in the Algarve a Portuguese who don’t speak
English find it very difficult to be understood, has in less than a year
voted to leave the European Union, based, among many other arguments,
that the immigrants who have come into their territories refused to drop
their cultural values and refused to start to assimilate being British.

Did
the Portuguese police say this or that? Who gives a damn or who even
cares, right? They’re only natives and these Portuguese are even more
backward than the rest of Europe and we are Brits, so for God’s sake,
it’s obvious we know best!

Out of curiosity we would like to know
from Mr Mitchell an example of a “relevant inquiry” the British
media was making by “by midnight, one a.m.”.

And also what gave the
sensation that the police officer in front of the McCanns was not moving
heaven and earth? Maybe because Kate didn’t search for her own daughter
and so could observe attentively the lack of urgency she thought they
were having?

Or, was it because they didn’t call the helicopters
at once like in a Hollywood movie?

As far as we know, by midnight no one
from the Tapas 9 is on record asking for a helicopter but by
midnight, the British media was already making “relevant” inquiries.

12. The fake agency

At
12.42 says Bilton: “A British investigator brought in to help the
Portuguese says he initially had concerns about Gerry McCann “When I met
Gerry I was struck by how cold and clinical he appeared to be, so why
did… you know, I’m human as well as being a police officer and did think
hmmm… and reflect on that, but I wanted to say very clearly as time has
gone on, I’m absolutely convinced that it wasn’t the parents””

That investigator being Jim Gamble who appears on the programme with the title “Former Head, Child Protection Agency”

There
is no such thing as a Child Protection Agency, or ever was. What exists in
the NSPCC – National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.

What Gamble was, was the former head of the CEOP – Child Exploitation Online Protection.

To
say he headed something called Child Protection Agency, would make him o to have been “brought in to help the Portuguese”, while being
the head of something protecting children against online threats
makes no sense at all for him to be at the scene at all.

The fact
the name of the agency is invented tells us that Bilton is either a
liar, and tried to fool his viewers or then he’s quite an incompetent
journalist and the liar would then be Jim Gamble.

Ian Horrocks
thinks the McCanns are innocent because there’s no family history to
back up their guilt but Gamble takes British criminal profiling a step
further, he thinks a “hmmm” and determines if a person is guilty or
innocent.

Last week we made a proposal for a survey to (NOT) be
made among all prisoners and release all those who didn’t have family
history of similar crimes and this week we propose (NOT) that those
still unreleased should line up and have Jim Gamble have a good look at
them. All those he says “hmmm” to should be released immediately.

14. Case against the McCanns

Up
to here Bilton seems to be building a rather solid case against the
McCanns.

In favour of them we have, up to here only Clarence Mitchell
ridiculously justifying why the Portuguese order was intentionally disobeyed about not involving the media and Jim Gamble’s
profound “hmmm-profiling” certainly resulting from years of experience
heading an agency that has never existed.

The curtains of the bedroom showing
that they were fixed, even stuck, and not flapping about, the window
closed and the shutter down contradicted Mitchell’s account of what he
says happened.

Even the bars on the window created the sensation that leaving the children alone in that room was a reckless decision.

But it is at this point of the show that Bilton starts to “debunk” the Portuguese investigation. Subtly but steadily.

15. The dogs

From 13.20 onwards the Panorama programme brings in the dogs:

Bilton
voice off: “The Portuguese detectives were looking at Kate and Gerry
McCann and central to their theory were 2 sniffer dogs from the UK.They
assist investigations because they can find minute traces of blood or
where bodies have been. They were taken into apartment 5A 3 months after
Madeleine disappeared.Both reacted.The cadaver dog
which tracks the smell of a dead body also grabbed Madeleine's favourite
toy Cuddle Cat. When the police found out the soft toy had been washed
they became more suspicious.”

The programme then cuts to an interview between Mitchell and Bilton:

Mitchel: “Kate washed it because simply it had become dirty, quite filthy and grubby.She'd
been holding onto it in front of the world's media for something like
70 days. If it was that important piece of evidence why did the
Portuguese police allow it to keep it for 70 days before she even washed
it?”Bilton: “Can you not see how the police might view it as suspicious though, particularly given that the dog reacted to it?”Mitchell:
“If you see the video Richard, the dog pulls it out at one point then
walks past it twice without even going back to it.”Bilton voice
off: “But Cuddle Cat remained part of the Portuguese theory. The sniffer
dogs were also taken to check 10 vehicles. They only barked when they
came to the McCann's hire car. The dogs jumped into the boot. Their
reaction was widely reported and was seen as damning evidence in
Portugal.”

The programme then cuts to an interview between Sandra Felgueiras with Kate and Gerry McCann:

Felgueiras: “How can you explain the coincidence of the scent of cadaver found by British not Portuguese dogs?”Kate: “Sandra maybe you should be asking the judiciary because they've examined all this.”Felgueiras: “But don't you have an explanation for that?”Gerry: “Ask the dogs Sandra.”Felgueiras: “Ask the dogs? No Gerry. Now I think I feel free to ask you.”

The programme then cuts to an interview between Sandra Felgueiras and Richard Bilton:

Bilton: “Do you remember talking to Kate and Gerry McCann about the sniffer dogs? Do you remember that exchange?”Felgueiras:
“I remember as if it was today. He answered me “Ask the dogs” and I
replied I'm asking you Gerry. I think it was something like that.”Bilton: “What did you think of Gerry's reaction?”Felgueiras:
“I thought he's being arrogant, he's not understanding my point. I'm
not offending him. I just want him to give me his opinion.”

The programme then cuts to the interview between Sandra Felgueiras with Kate and Gerry McCann:

Felgueiras: “Don't you feel free to answer me?”Gerry: “I can tell you that we obviously looked at evidence about cadaver dogs and they're incredibly unreliable.”Felgueiras: “Unreliable?”Gerry: “Cadaver dogs, yes. That's what the evidence shows if they are tested scientifically.”

The programme then cuts to the interview between Sandra Felgueiras and Richard Bilton:

Felgueiras: “He just tried to fight. It was a kind of fight not a kind of an interview.”Bilton voice off: “It got worse for the McCanns. Traces of blood were discovered in the apartment.The
police found tiny samples of DNA in the car and in this apartment and
early tests suggested that that DNA could be could be Madeleine McCanns.The
Portuguese had settled on their theory and before they knew the final
DNA results: Madeleine had died in apartment 5A and her parents had
covered it up.The official PJ report concluded that Kate and
Gerry McCann were involved in the concealment of the body of their
daughter Madeleine.”

Again Bilton shows where this is shown in the PJ Files.

We have put this all together because it is
here that Bilton starts, subtly to dismantle speciously the Portuguese
investigation.

16. Debunking the cadaver dog

One of
the biggest problem the other side has is to justify why the dogs, more
specifically Eddie, the cadaver dog, reacted to the living room, the
parent’s bedroom, the backyard, Kate’s clothes, the toddler t-shirt and
the Renault Scenic.

Note of the above how many of these
items/locations were mentioned of where Eddie signalled it. If the reader says
the Renault Scenic the reader is wrong.

The reader will be wrong because when it
comes to the cuddly cat, it is said specifically that it was the cadaver
dog but when it comes to the Scenic both dogs amalgamated into “sniffer
dogs”.

They started to debunk Eddie with the cuddle cat.

They
must have viewed the dog video a thousand times to see how possible it would
be to discredit Eddie and they saw it in the 2 times the dog passes the
cuddle cat without signalling.

A toy that is said that had been washed so would only have minimal residues of cadaver odour, which, by the way Eddie detected.

But
says Mitchell: “If it was that important piece of evidence why did
the Portuguese police allow it to keep it for 70 days before she even
washed it?”

Because Mr Mitchell, 70 days after May 4, makes it
July 13, and the cuddly cat only became an object of interest after the
dogs arrived in Luz which was at the end of July.

Remember, like
with the Daily Mail, this programme was not intended to be seen by those who minimally understand the case, but by those, the majority, who only
know of the case from what they read and see in the media.

From
Mitchell’s words it seems that the PJ should have considered the cuddle
cat an object of interest, and for that to happen it would only have
been after the dog sniffed it, so if it was allowed to be washed then
that could only have happened after Eddie had picked it up.

Mr
Mitchell’s question seems to imply not only incompetence on the part of
the PJ but that even the PJ seemed to have little belief in the cadaver
dog’s capabilities.

After all, listening to his words, the cuddle cat was not confiscated, was it? It was even washed afterwards.

So
when Mitchell says, and the images confirm, that “If you see the video
Richard, the dog pulls it out at one point then walks past it twice
without even going back to it” the viewer starts to doubt about the
dog’s capabilities as they see Eddie pass the ‘unwashed’ cuddle cat
twice.

Let’s jump slightly forward to the “ask the dogs, Sandra”
bit.

Being arrogant and unpleasant does not make one a liar, after all
he states with a high degree of confidence that he’s studied the issue and,
so says the arrogant and unpleasant doctor (which Sandra Felgueiras makes a point of reinforcing that idea), that scientifically the cadaver dogs have been
proven unreliable:

Gerry: “I can tell you that we obviously looked at evidence about cadaver dogs and they're incredibly unreliable.”Felgueiras: “Unreliable?”Gerry: “Cadaver dogs, yes. That's what the evidence shows if they are tested scientifically.”

So
henceforth Bilton treats both dogs as an amalgamated “sniffer dogs”:
“The sniffer dogs were also taken to check 10 vehicles. They only barked
when they came to the McCann's hire car. The dogs jumped into the boot.
Their reaction was widely reported and was seen as damning evidence in
Portugal.”

17. Discarding, once and for all, the cadaver scent

And then Bilton plays the ace of trump, discarding the cadaver scent like a piece of trash to the bin:

“It got worse for the McCanns. Traces of blood were discovered in the apartment.The
police found tiny samples of DNA in the car and in this apartment and
early tests suggested that that DNA could be could be Madeleine
McCanns.”

See the trick? Cadaver scent no longer matters or is even referred to.

People, says Bilton, it’s the blood that is the worst for the McCanns, let’s focus on the blood.

And blurred behind in this new storyline is left to be forgotten the cadaver scents on the cuddle cat and not even mentioned where in
the living-room, in the bedroom, in the backyard, on Kate’s clothes, on the
toddler’s t-shirts and the key FOB. On the Scenic disguised as having been detected by sniffer-dogs.

Bilton, is a whistleblower, so we can trust him, thinks the public. If he says that the blood is what is the worst for the McCanns, then it must be.

And
one cannot accuse him of not having mentioned the cadaver dog and the
cadaver scent. He did.

He just made sure they quickly became a hazy memory in the background, an issue done and dealt with, because what really mattered was the DNA found in the
apartment and car.

And immediately sets the scenario on how to dismantle the threat that remained: the blood found in the apartment and the scenic.

23 comments:

I agree - this Panorama was just a form of propaganda. The fact that Clarence and Gamble were heavily featured speaks for itself. But whydoes BBC Panorama allow itself to be used? Fore me it makes a mockery of BBC and it's Panorama programme. Who is at the bottom of the decision for the BBC to show this biased rubbish? Historically, for BBC to show such propaganda - the decision would have perhaps come from the government ..... but in the case of the MC Cann saga.. ?

Why is Gerry wearing what appears to be a rubber surgical glove on his right hand only when seen leaning in through the rear passenger door at 22.10 minutes in, but not wearing it at 22.06 minutes in when shown putting a box in to the boot??? i would be most interested on your theory on this textusa sisters. regards to you for your excellent blog as always.

The most comical piece was surely using Heriberto Gonzalez as though he was some kind of expert. So he reaches in through an already unlocked window, and abducts a pillow so this proves an abductor could have broken in? Shame he was abducting from the wrong bed.

If any of your posts ever made me angry this tops the lot. The BBC owned by the people and used to deceive the people. Nothing has changed from the days of saville. For Mitchell, gamble and co to participate so enthusiastically makes me think that they know that they are well protected and their words will not come back to bite them. For a few years there both had dropped of the scene and you had a feeling they were swimming away from a wreck now I believe they are convinced that the ship isn't actually going down and they are swimming back to retrieve the last of the gold which a dead 3 year old has provided for 10 years

"The official PJ report concluded that Kate and Gerry McCann were involved in the concealment of the body of their daughter Madeleine.”The PJFile RB quotes and highlights on screen isn't the final PJ report as he claims it to be. It is, both times, the intermediary report of Tavares de Almeida.Therefore I'm not sure that RB really read correctly the files.To say nothing of the fact that no credit is given to the translator who did that job pro bono. Shameful .

In terms of this:Gerry: “I can tell you that we obviously looked at evidence about cadaver dogs and they're incredibly unreliable.”Felgueiras: “Unreliable?”Gerry: “Cadaver dogs, yes. That's what the evidence shows if they are tested scientifically.”

We would like to bring over to this post what we wrote in our post "The Third Option":http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2016/03/third-option.html

"That’s exactly what happens when Insane brings into the discussion the “Osterhelweg paper”. It makes him look intellectual and smart but he’s just being nothing more than disingenuous and deceitful.

“Two deceased individuals, a 60-year-old male (A) and a 63-year-old male (B) were admitted to the Institute of Legal Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg. They were immediately transported to a tent placed within the inner courtyard of the institute. The location for this investigation was specifically chosen in order to minimize a potential cross contamination of any odors with those of stored, putrefied bodies within the Institute. Both men (A and B) had publicly collapsed and died despite comprehensive resuscitative efforts. At the start of our investigation, the postmortem interval for both men (A and B) was measured at 110 and 120 min, respectively.

Brand new carpet squares 20 cm _ 20 cm were purchased and used as the medium for the odor transport. Before the initiation of this investigation, the carpet squares were stored in airtight containers outside the boundaries of the Institute of Legal Medicine.

The two bodies were placed in a supine position on top of a new and clean table and a separate table was used for each individual. A cotton blanket was wrapped around each body to preclude the direct contamination of the carpet squares with the bodies while at the same time simulating a thin layer of clothing covering each individual. A total of 32 carpet squares were placed subsequently underneath the backside of the torsos. Within 45 min of the arrival at the institute, 24 carpet squares (body A) were ‘‘contaminated’’ for 10 min during three consecutive sessions. Within 15 min of arriving at the institute, eight other carpet squares (body B) were contaminated for 2 min during two subsequent sessions. Additionally, living individuals who denied having had any contact with deceased tissues served as control subjects and contaminated an additional eight carpet squares. Immediately following the contamination, the carpet squares were placed into airtight glass jars and brought to the Police Dog Training Center (LPS 36) at the Hamburg State Police Department.”

We think the “other work” is indeed this paper because it contains some sound-bites that taken out of context suit Insane’s rhetoric:“Within 45 min of the arrival at the institute”, “Within 15 min of arriving at the institute”, “were ‘‘contaminated’’ for 10 min” and “were contaminated for 2 min”.

Gosh Textusa, just shows their desperation to diss those amazing dogs reliability!! Hopefully the latest government,s decision to bring in sniffer dogs to help in the detection of "bombs" etc following the carnage in Manchester,will show just how stupid ,people who actually know the value of specially trained dogs are,but are still prepared to go along with this charade,the bigger question is,WHY!!the million dollar question,many people I,m sure,must look in their mirrors ,knowing,they could open "Pandoras Box",but after 10 years ,I suspect they have learnt to live with their guilt.

Textusa I'm not sure if you got my last DO NOT PUBLISH message. Is insane and Not Textusa the same person. It's just on another blog I perhaps wrongly said that a disrupter of the blog was Not Textusa and that she ( only found out it was a she during the discussion) had been given a sharp shift off the blog when she previously tried to dis the dogs evidence. This was quickly rebutted by both John Blacksmith ( who I was sure had ignored posts before from NT) and another commentor who both testified to her intelligence and that she had always supported the dogs findings. Am I barking ( pardon the pun) up the wrong tree

We received your DO NOT PUBLISH comment. Please understand that it's completely different, and simpler, to just click on a link that says "Publish" than to respond to a comment when one is not sitting down calmly or is with company.

For that reason we did not acknowledge the receipt of your comment when we received it.

Insane and NT are the same person.

Insane defends whatever he defends, depending on which character he's playing at the moment.

He has a character here, another on Twitter, another on CMOMM, and various on Hutton's blog.

Here, as Insane, he defends the dogs.

To the point to say that Eddie was able to pick up cadaver scent odour floating about in a house which was in constant use (doors and windows being opened and closed) after months.

Thanks Textusa. I have read them posts many times over the last couple of years. The information you provide in them are quite outstanding. I'm a big fan of John Blacksmith and Ros also even if I don't always agree with everything they say. As I have said before I think you are all part of what you describe as the GReat Maddie War. Thank you again its nice to be forewarned

In relation to " bars on the windows" ...yes the bars are there now. But 10 year's ago I don't think so. I recall seeing a photo of forensic work on the shutters and there were no bars. Otherwise a very good article. Well done.

Having the bars on the window was intended to imply that the residents of PDL were so frightened of the abductor that they had taken precautions. The post shows that bars on the windows was not a common theme because everyone knows the abduction tale is crap.

Panorama interviewed a criminologist showing he could open the shutter and window with ease and kidnap Madeline. However given that there are now bars on the window this was Not the apartment the Mccanns used. Panorama will have to explain this or accept the fact we were misled.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)