Argumentative favoring capital punishment - Essay Example

The issue of capital punishment continues to generate significant social, political and judicial debate. While supporters of death penalty argue that capital punishments would deter dreaded criminals from indulging in serious crimes there are many who hold that death penalty is against one’s human rights. …

Extract of sample"Argumentative favoring capital punishment"

Capital punishments ensure retributive justice to the victims and their family members. Undoubtedly, capital punishments act as the strongest deterrents that stand as warning boards to dreaded criminals and as such death penalty is the need of the time as homicides and serious offenses are at an increasing rate worldwide.
The growing rate of serious criminal activities and homicides has prompted many to think in favor of capital punishments. It is a fact that where there are no provisions for death penalty in the judicial system there are no forces that can deter dreaded criminals who pose threats to the lives of common man. It is the duty of the judicial system to safeguard the lives of innocent victims as well. While the abolitionists lament over the extreme pain during execution they do not think of the atrocities and damages the convict has caused. Kronenwetter, in this respect, believes that people who are against capital punishment undermine ‘the deterrent aspect of legal punishment;’ for the author, “pain and discomfort are an inherent and necessary aspect of legal punishment for crime” and there is nothing unconstitutional when vicious criminals undergo some sort of pain and suffering for their atrocities (Kronenwetter 65). It can thus be concluded that capital punishments can never be regarded as unconstitutional or unusual.
Capital punishment system considers death penalty as the strongest form of deterrence and preserver of judicial retribution. Death penalty, undoubtedly, is a great tool of deterrence in putting an end to serious and cruel criminal activities....
The criminals are most likely to indulge in more of serious crimes when the judicial system poses no threats to their own lives. The proponents of death penalty believe that death penalty is a better deterrent than other alternative punishments such as life imprisonment. It is a fact that abolitionists who stress on the value of the life of a convicted murderer or, at least, his non-execution fail to “value the lives of the innocent victims who might be spared by deterring prospective murderers” (Haag). In the same way, it is the duty of the judicial system to ensure that retributive social justice is maintained, the interests of the common public are protected and that their lives are being secured and guarded against unwanted tragedies. Ernest van den Haag, Professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University, purports that it would be a failure of the judicial system of the nation if dreaded criminals are not punished adequately for their crimes. According to him, capital punishment acts as a powerful deterrent for the criminal minded people to abstain from crimes as he believes in the common sense evidence that fear of the death penalty is likely to deter many would-be criminals from committing murder (Haag). Besides, he holds that sparing criminals from death penalty would pose further threat to many more innocent lives. A similar view point is expressed by Louis P. Pojman when he states that it is the failure of the judicial system of the nation if dreaded criminals are not punished as retribution of their crimes. Besides, he holds that sparing criminals from death penalty would pose further threat to many more innocent lives. Thus Pojman concludes that the judicial system has to go ahead with death penalty as sparing the lives of convicted murderers
Read More

Capital punishment has been abolished in many countries across Europe, Latin America although it is still retained in some parts of Asia and Africa1. In non democratic countries, especially in Middle East, capital punishment is still quite common. Capital punishment is usually given for murder, treason and in Muslim countries it is also given for sexual and religious crimes2.

Some raise questions over ethical acceptability of the issue as well. The societies have in the past punished the criminals by sentencing them to death but now with the modernization of the world, there are many nations which have abolished the death penalty.

Mrs. Nasser brought her 16-year-old daughter, Samia, who was experiencing a burning sensation upon urination. She was worried about the condition but was against vaginal examination on her daughter. Attempts by the nurse to calm her down were futile and she insisted that the doctor write a prescription without the examination or she would leave the clinic.

According to Robert Ruby’s “Capital Punishment’s Constant Constituency: An American Majority,” capital punishment has long since been a heated topic of debate of fairness and of constitutional rights and ethics. Between the years of 1972 and 2007, the Supreme Court has gone through many moments of indecision in concerns of the capital punishment.

Rabbah, 1987). With the appearance of God, the rationale for imposing the capital punishment shifted from private revenge to a divine one.
The first capital punishment law was the lex talonis of the God of Hamurabi (M.H. Reggio, 2008). Later, in the seventh century BC, the Draconian Code of Athens prescribed death as a punishment for all crimes.

The elusiveness of the world beyond human rationality was the powerful impetus to the emergence of a widely accepted form of mysticism, which is religion. The technological society, even until now, is incapable of providing answers to the most far-fetched questions that

Supporters of capital punishment are of the view that in the absence of capital punishment, people may engage in more criminal activities. In their opinion, crime rates cannot be controlled without strong

I cannot allow them to participate in the research based on my moral assumption that the value of human life is fundamental and ought to be protected at all times. For the case of Janice, I find it necessary to exclude her because she can accidentally eat a playdough and for

In addition, there exist a number of arguments in favor of and against death penalty. Thesis statement: Death penalty or capital punishment is a controversial issue but the same is the best possible way to provide justice to the victim, not the

While it may not restore the lost life, the impact that the judicial system makes through such stringent punishment is argued in the support of a death sentence. In view of the magnitude of criminality that varies from one

The practice is not uniform across the states in the US. Some of the states do not allow capital punishment while others have the law permitting capital punishment. However, execution procedures may differ. As of May 2013, the District of Columbia and 18 other States have abolished the capital punishment for any kind of crime whatsoever.

4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!

TRY US!

sponsored ads

Save Your Time for More Important Things

Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Argumentative essay favoring capital punishment"
with a personal 20% discount.