Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White

4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined

↗ 2 ms rise

↘ 2.4 ms fall

The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).

↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey

5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined

↗ 2.8 ms rise

↘ 2.8 ms fall

The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

59.52 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5519 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.71 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%Compared to all devices tested» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HTC 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.13 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%Compared to all devices tested» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.38 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 17% worse» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%Compared to all devices tested» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%