LETTER: Berwick's argument does not convince

Wednesday

Apr 4, 2018 at 1:48 PMApr 4, 2018 at 1:48 PM

To the editor:

Ann Berwick’s piece published March 28 stands out as an example of how not to make a convincing argument. Her sweeping assertion that any objection to her point of view is “implausible” makes me doubt whether she has actually considered those different perspectives, or simply moved straight on to her conclusion. There are, in fact, many perfectly plausible reasons why one might not want to support an increased RPS. Perhaps in a future piece, she will actually address those and convince us why she has the winning argument! I look forward to that.