FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?TradCatKnight- MOST VIEWED & FOLLOWEDTraditional Catholic APOSTOLATE Worldwide!As Seen on:Gloria.tv, SpiritDaily, Shoebat, Canon212, VeteransToday, Beforeitsnews& many other notable websitesBOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!Welcome to my Nest.#EagleoftheFortress WEBSITE OWNERS: Don't Forget To Add Us On Your Page!ALEXA- TOP 25K WEBSITE WORLDWIDE

Thursday, October 20, 2016

"Catholic" school forcing erotic sex-ed on children has a horrifying history of sex abuse

"Catholic" school forcing erotic sex-ed on children has a horrifying history of sex abuse

NASHVILLE, Tennessee, October 19, 2016 (LifeSiteNews)
-- Three mental health professionals are warning parents whose children
attend Fr. Ryan High School in Nashville, Tennessee that the school’s
mandatory explicit sex-ed course puts their children at risk for sexual
abuse. Their concerns are amplified by the fact that the school has a
history of sexual abuse of students by administration dating back to the
early 1960s.

“In my line of work I’ve seen time and again the pattern of how
predators use material like this emphasizing explicit sexual detail and
encouraging physical contact to erode a child’s innate sense of modesty,
making them vulnerable to be preyed upon,” psychiatrist Dr. Rick
Fitzgibbons told LifeSiteNews.
When Fitzgibbons reviewed Fr. Ryan High School’s sex-ed program,
including the supplement “Growing toward Intimacy” by Bob Bartlett, he
told LifeSiteNews that the course puts children at risk of future sexual
abuse.
“I’ve counseled too many victims who have shared a common story about
how sexually explicit images and details were foisted on them by the
predator to groom them for abuse,” he said.
“It is my assessment that some of the content in Fr. Ryan’s sex-ed
program puts children at risk for future sexual abuse,” he stated.Cover of Father Ryan's sex-ed course The
“Human Sexuality” course taught as part of Father Ryan High School’s
Theology course offers graphic images and erotic sexual details
concerning male and female body parts. Not only do students learn the
pleasure points of the male and female reproductive organs, but they
also learn biological details about male and female genitals in a state
of arousal. Students also learn 10 different forms of contraception and
are tested on how they function. A detailed outline of the course’s
problematic content can be found in LifeSiteNews’ previous coverage here.Parents
objecting to the course have called it “erotic” and a “near occasion of
sin.” While a number of parents have asked that their children be opted
out of the course, the school, backed by the bishop, has refused to grant their request. Last week the school went as far as expelling a student because of the parents’ ongoing opposition to the sex-ed course.
While Fitzgibbons said that the program’s explicit details, such as
emphasizing the pleasure points of the male and female reproductive
organs, fails to respect the innocence of youth by giving them
information that is more appropriate to married couples, he drew special
attention to a supplemental book given to students taking the course
that quotes pro-homosexual priest Richard Rohr about the “need to be
touched.”
“It’s a huge red flag that this program makes youths vulnerable to a
sexual predator when it specifically desensitizes them to being touched
by others,” he said. “This is exactly the kind of tool that a sexual
predator would employ to breakdown a child’s natural resistance to such
an intrusion,” he added.
Dr. Thomas O’Brien, a licensed counselor in Pennsylvania and New
Jersey as well as a deacon in the Diocese of Camden, agrees with
Fitzgibbons that the sex-ed course has the potential to groom children
for sexual-abuse.
“Showing sketches of the genitals and specifically identifying areas
of sexual arousal has the potential for a predator to groom a male or
female who may be feeling sexually uncomfortable or awkward about their
own bodies and offering to help them to better understand what is
‘normal’ in the groomer's manipulative manner,” he told LifeSiteNews.
Father Ryan High School has a lengthy public history of school staff
preying on students for sexual abuse and of the diocese mishandling the
cases, as reported extensively by local media. One abuser, a priest, was
at one point a teacher of Father Ryan’s sex-ed course.

1961 – Father Paul Fredrick Haas, biology and physiology teacher at Father Ryan High School, allegedly raped sophomore
David Brown. In 1996 Brown approaches the Nashville diocese under
Bishop Edward Kmiec with allegations of the abuse, even though Haas had
already died from cancer 17 years earlier. That same year, the diocese
paid Brown $5,720 in exchange for a signed contract promising not to
sue.

1970-89 – While being investigated for raping three boys, Father Frank Richards admits to molesting dozens of young males, including some during the time he taught
at Father Ryan High School, where LifeSiteNews learned he taught the
sex-ed course. Richards was never charged due to the expiration of the
8-year statute of limitations. He left the priesthood in 1989 and moved
to Florida.

1972 – Father Edward McKeown, a teacher at Father Ryan High School, molests
a 14-year-old student from the school. McKeown went on to abuse dozens
of boys during the next 14 years. The diocese, under Bishop Niedergeses,
largely hid his crimes, moving the priest around in silence, according
to critics, before kicking him out of the diocese in 1989. McKeown was
finally convicted in 1999 of raping a non-Catholic boy in 1995 and
jailed for 25 years without parole. McKeown left the priesthood in 1989.

1978-1981 – Father Ron Dickman, principal of Father Ryan High School, repeatedly molests students, according to accusers (here and here).
While Dickman denied the allegations, he nevertheless resigned as
principal in 1987 and left the priesthood in 1991 after one of his
accusers brought the case before the diocese. Dickman was never charged
due to the 8-year statute of limitations.

The diocese, currently led by Bishop David Choby, has backed the sex-ed course. The bishop stated in a letter to parents
last month that the course “has been offered to a positive effect for
over 30 years” in Father Ryan High School. The bishop called the sex-ed
program a “legitimate requirement” for graduation, to the parents’
disbelief.

Parents
opposing the sex-ed course have told LifeSiteNews of their numerous
attempts to meet with the bishop and explain their concerns, only to be
disregarded and ignored. Their frustration is augmented by the fact that
state public schools are required by law to allow parents the option to
opt their children out of sex-ed classes.

Share this article to spread the word!

The
parents’ experience of having their serious concerns involving
sexuality dismissed by the diocese appears to be part of a trend that
others have experienced as well. When Choby was installed as bishop in
2006, Nashville Scene’s reporter Liz Garrigan begged him in an article
to do a better job than his predecessors in addressing the sexual abuse
crisis within the diocese while truly helping the victims.

“The
Diocese has yet to get right the treatment of these folks [who have
been sexually abused]. It has employed mafia-like defense mechanisms,
high-powered legal maneuvering and Clintonian language splicing to
belittle, deflect and minimize the pain of these victims—all the while
claiming to offer them help. In the meantime, Catholics across the city,
this editor included, have watched in utter disbelief, shaking our
heads not only at the arrogance of the Diocese’s actions and responses
but also at the chronic and stupefying mishandling of your public
relations efforts,” she wrote at that time.

Growing Toward Intimacy by Bob Bartlett, a book given to students as part of the sex-ed course

LifeSiteNews contacted Bishop Choby for comment, but did not receive a response by press time.

Fitzgibbons
said that with the school’s decades-long history of sexual abuse of
students, parents should be “outraged” that administration — backed by
the diocese — is relentlessly pushing the explicit course while not
allowing parents to opt their kids out of it. He suggested that the main
backers of the course should be scrutinized by a specialized review
board.

“Parents
should consider whether a complaint should be filed for an evaluation
by a review board — as described in the Dallas Charter norms — for those
responsible for this course that places youth at risk,” he said.

The Dallas Charter,
approved by the U.S. Bishop’s Conference in 2002, empowers bishops to
deal appropriately and effectively in cases of sexual abuse of minors by
church-related personnel.

“Some
might consider this playing hardball,” said Fitzgibbons, “but I’ll tell
you that if my children were in that school, that’s what I’d do.
Parents with kids in the school need to realize that this program places
their kids at risk for sexual abuse, especially when they consider the
school’s long history of sexual abuse.”

Fitzgibbons
suggested that if the local bishop fails to take parents’ concerns
seriously, they should file a complaint against him with the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors,
the pope’s recently implemented system of accountability for Catholic
bishops who mishandle sexual abuse within their dioceses.

“If
parents are not getting the bishop’s support in protecting their
children from future sexual abuse brought on by this program, then there
are organs in the Church that parents can make use of if they believe
that their children are at risk,” he said. “If families believe that the
bishop is not living up to the Dallas Charter, that bishop could be
reported to the bishops accountability office,” he added.

Bishop David Choby

Dr.
Todd Bowman, associate professor of counseling at Indiana Wesleyan
University, called the school’s refusal to allow parents to opt their
kids out of the course an “abuse of power.”

“It
appears the school is violating the conscience of the parents, and,
potentially, the students. My take on this as a professional is that
subjecting students to a curriculum that the parents do not want them to
be exposed to is a violation of paternal rights, and is fundamentally
inconsistent with Church teaching on the nature and role of the family,”
he told LifeSiteNews.

Bowman
drew a comparison between the school’s history of sexual abuse and its
current position of not allowing parents to opt their kids out of the
explicit course.

“In
many ways, the school is perpetuating its apparent history of sexual
violence by taking its current stance that parents cannot opt out of
said sexual education curriculum. Sexual violence is characterized by
exerting power over another and engaging in an inappropriate act against
the will of the victim. It would seem, in this instance, that
subjecting students to exposure of sexual content, even in the form of
an educational process, against the will of their legal guardian would
fall in a similar vein,” he said.

“I would expect a lawsuit forthcoming from parents should the school persist in its current stance on the matter,” he added.

O’Brien agreed with Bowman that parents should take a proactive stand.

“You
the parent should be concerned about what your son or daughter is being
presented and by whom. Such material should not be selected and
imposed. You should decide what they read and see regarding the issue of
human sexuality,” he said.

ALEXA RANK

Find The Rank Of Any Website

DAILY NEWS- Scroll Thru The Latest News

Archbishop Lefebvre

“This Second Vatican Council Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.”

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Archbishop Lefebvre

“And we have the precise conviction that this new rite of Mass expresses a new faith, a faith which is not ours, a faith which is not the Catholic Faith. This New Mass is a symbol, is an expression, is an image of a new faith, of a Modernist faith. ….Now it is evident that the new rite, if I may say so, supposes another conception of the Catholic religion-another religion.”

TRADCATKNIGHT FORUM

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON TUMBLR!

TCK Facebook

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON PINTEREST

Archbishop Lefebvre

That Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church, because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship, all already condemned by the Church in many a document, official and definitive.... The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church...

Fr. Hesse Summary on Vatican II

Vatican II = Heretical & Schismatic

Exposing Vatican II & New Mass, Fr. Villa

Archbishop Lefebvre

“Well, we are not of this religion. We do not accept this new religion. We are of the religion of all time; we are of the Catholic religion. We are not of this 'universal religion' as they call it today-this is not the Catholic religion any more. We are not of this Liberal, Modernist religion which has its own worship, its own priests, its own faith, its own catechisms, its own Bible, the 'ecumenical Bible'-these things we do not accept."

Traditional Quotes & Prayers

The Real 3rd Secret of Fatima

Inlcudes Vatican II and the soon Apostate Church..."...because Fatima is a very apocalyptic message. It says that no matter what happens there are going to be terrible wars, there are going to be diseases, whole nations are going to be wiped out, there are going to be 3 days darkness, there are going to be epidemics that will wipe out whole nations overnight, parts of the earth will be washed away at sea and violent tornadoes and storms. It's not a nice message at all." Fr Malachi Martin

SSPX Marian Corps Donations

Marian Corps-Australasia

Fr. Chazal

Fr. Girouard

Or send a cheque made out to Fr. Patrick Girouard at : P.O.Box 1543, Aldergrove, BC, V4W 2V1, Canada.

St. Marcel Initiative

Or, if you prefer, in the U.S., make your contribution by telephone, toll free: 855-4-S. Marcel (855.476.2723), or internationally, by sending your donation directly to donations@stmarcelinitiative.com via PayPal.

TCK TESTIMONIALS

Eric Gajewski, Founder of DefeatModernism(formerly known as Defeat the Heresies)

Resistance Forum

True Traditionalist Forum

Pope XII: “Suicide Of Altering the Faith In Her Liturgy…..”

"I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past."A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, 'Where have they taken Him?'"

Signup To Google+. Then Youtube Then Begin Interacting! Click the Pic Above!

Current Crusaders Online Worldwide (RealTime)

St. Bernard:

Go forth confidently then, you knights, and repel the foes of the cross of Christ with a stalwart heart. Know that neither death nor life can separate you from the love of God which is in Jesus Christ, and in every peril repeat, "Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's." What a glory to return in victory from such a battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! Rejoice, brave athlete, if you live and conquer in the Lord; but glory and exult even more if you die and join your Lord. Life indeed is a fruitful thing and victory is glorious, but a holy death is more important than either. If they are blessed who die in the Lord, how much more are they who die for the Lord!

How secure, I say, is life when death is anticipated without fear; or rather when it is desired with feeling and embraced with reverence! How holy and secure this knighthood and how entirely free of the double risk run by those men who fight not for Christ! Whenever you go forth, O worldly warrior, you must fear lest the bodily death of your foe should mean your own spiritual death, or lest perhaps your body and soul together should be slain by him.

Indeed, danger or victory for a Christian depends on the dispositions of his heart and not on the fortunes of war. If he fights for a good reason, the issue of his fight can never be evil; and likewise the results can never be considered good if the reason were evil and the intentions perverse. If you happen to be killed while you are seeking only to kill another, you die a murderer. If you succeed, and by your will to overcome and to conquer you perchance kill a man, you live a murderer. Now it will not do to be a murderer, living or dead, victorious or vanquished. What an unhappy victory--to have conquered a man while yielding to vice, and to indulge in an empty glory at his fall when wrath and pride have gotten the better of you!

But what of those who kill neither in the heat of revenge nor in the swelling of pride, but simply in order to save themselves? Even this sort of victory I would not call good, since bodily death is really a lesser evil than spiritual death. The soul need not die when the body does. No, it is the soul which sins that shall die.

The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes, and serves himself when he falls. Neither does he bear the sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he is not a mankiller, but, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ towards evildoers and he is rightly considered a defender of Christians. Should he be killed himself, we know that he has not perished, but has come safely into port.

Once he finds himself in the thick of battle, this knight sets aside his previous gentleness, as if to say, "Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord; am I not disgusted with your enemies?" These men at once fall violently upon the foe, regarding them as so many sheep. No matter how outnumbered they are, they never regard these as fierce barbarians or as awe-inspiring hordes. Nor do they presume on their own strength, but trust in the Lord of armies to grant them the victory.

.

.

Saint Athanasius

"May God console you! ... What saddens you ... is the fact that others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises – but you have the Apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith?The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith? True, the premises are good when the Apostolic Faith is preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way ..."You are the ones who are happy; you who remain within the Church by your Faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has come down to you from Apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis. No one, ever, will prevail against your Faith, beloved Brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day. "Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray. Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ."