Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The xen RPM in Fedora isn't new enough to support libxl builds
> yet. Disable it until Fedora 16
>
> Q: What actually is the min required Xen ? Is xen 4.0.1
> in fact sufficient ? If so I'll change this to s/16/15/
>
Xen 4.0.x contains some "tech preview" libxenlight bits, but it is buggy
and missing quite a bit of functionality. Xen 4.1.0 is the first release
with a usable libxenlight IMO. Also, the API changed quite a bit between
Xen 4.0 and 4.1 and I have not attempted to make the libxl driver work
with the preview libxenlight.
Regards,
Jim