Email this article to a friend

Thursday, Oct 20, 2011, 10:18 am

Bold Action Isn’t Always Best—at Least at First

Members of ILWU picket at the Port of Longview, in Washington state, in July 2011. (Photo by People's World.)

A longshoremen struggle and the Huffington Post boycott underscore the importance of carefully escalating labor campaigns

A few months ago, Ezra Klein and I got in an argument about former SEIU labor organizer Stephen Lerner’s idea of a mass strategic default on mortgages, in which many Americans whose mortgages are "underwater" would default on their mortgages in order to hurt big banks and force them to deal with the foreclosure crisis. Klein wrote: “It’s unlikely that the union movement would actually adopt Lerner’s plans, or that they’d even have the power to make good on them if they wanted to adopt them.”

Aside from radical farmers in the Dust Bowl during the 1930s, a strategic mortgage default campaign is practically unheard of in American history. Unions have never tried this, and it would be unlikely they could cause enough defaults to hurt the banks. Unions rarely are successful in significantly hurting the profits of major corporations when they threaten boycotts against corporations. But the threat of a boycott (rather than the actual boycott) can be a powerful tool in forcing a corporate executive to negotiate because of the negative publicity boycotts can produce, and the anxiety an unpredictable corporate campaign of escalation can produce for executives.

In other words, corporate campaigns are often about affecting corporate executives’ psychologically as much as they are about affecting corporate executives economically. As labor journalist Josh Eidelson is fond of saying, “You win in a labor fight when you break the will of an employer to resist."

The key to that kind of victory, though, is for escalating actions against a corporation to implicitly threaten an ultimate “big action” that wreak havoc on the company. The process of ecalating action should both build support among unionists and the public for such a final action, and make the management so fearful of the action that it decides to concede to workers' demands.

But many militant unionists prefer to go for the big action right way—as we saw in the struggle of a Longshoreman union local in Longview, Wash., and the attempted boycott of the Huffington Post by the Newspaper Guild and the National Writers Union this year. By employing major confrontational tactics at the start of a struggle, trade unionists risk becoming isolated without any additional way to rachet up pressure if the tactics prove ineffective in breaking the will of an employer to resist.

In Longview, longshoremen have employed a militant campaign of civil disobedience to stop the operation of a recently opened largely nonunion, port. Longshoreman and their families also physically blocked grain trains from entering the port by standing on railway tracks. In July, several hundred longshoremen invaded the port, cut the brake lines to a grain train, and dumped out several tons of grain. 100 longshoremen were arrested.

While the action clearly showed longshoreman were willing to get tough, it also may have undermined their cause. Initial media reports, which remain disputed by longshoremen, suggested the unionists were wielding baseball bats and threatening the physical safety of railroad operators. The company used these reports to seek costly federal injunctions against the union that prevent future actions attempting to block access to the nonunion port. It was very difficult for a judge not to issue a tough injunction against the union in the face of such apparent evidence.

Likewise, it’s difficult to build community support for a union struggle when violence has become involved. While a tough action like busting up a grain train may inspire and harden a hardcore group of union activists, it can also turn off less militant allies in the community, like small businessman and other citizens, who are weary of getting involved in a violent struggle. A lack of violent action and vandalism would have made it easier for the union to argue against tough injunctions against the union in federal court.

Instead of building an escalating corporate campaign of anxiety, the longshoremen deployed their “big threat” of vandalism—and the company has been able to resume their normal operations without problems. The railroad companies responded by hiring armed guards to help them enter the nonunion port. With the armed guards and additional police protection, the trains now enter the port of Longview regularly without problems. The longshoremen in Longview have no way to escalate the campaign.

Similarly, another high-profile labor struggle, unions' boycott of the Huffington Post (called in March because Huffington doesn't pay its bloggers, while profiting immensely off of their labor) has floundered. After the sale of Huffington Post to AOL this past March, the Newspaper Guild and National Writers Union called the boycott. (Update: Late on October 20, after this article was published, the Guild and NWU announced they were ending the boycott. But the NWU said it is "continuing and intensifying our Pay The Writer! campaign to establish fair pay rates for freelance journalists working for the Huffington Post and other online publications.")

Instead of running a massive corporate campaign of leafleting outside of Ariana Huffington’s speaking engagements and lining up supporters among prominent writers of the boycott, the two unions began making good on their big threat of boycotting the website. After the boycott, newspaper guild organizers scrambled to draw up lists of prominent writers supporting the boycott, but still have yet to produce such a list of people in support of the action. Few events or actions have been held to support the boycott, which has largely been ignored by prominent progressives, including several high-profile labor-funded progressives. No deal has been reached between the Huffington Post and the writers union and little support remains for the boycott.

The lesson in all of this is big bold actions are not always the best solution for winning a labor struggle. Even if a union does pull off dramatic actions such as boycotts or civil disobedience that temporarily stops the functioning of a targeted company, as in Longview, the actions may not result in breaking the will of a company to resist. As labor seeks to use the momentum of Occupy Wall Street to take on big corporations, it must remember that bold is not always the best way to beat a corporation—a careful plan of escalation is often crucial.

This post was updated to note that the National Writers Union/UAW Local 1981 ended its boycott of Huffington Post on October 20.

Lots of guys who played football as highschool kids think a strike is like a play, or a sudden confrontation in an alley...it isn't. You just look like a bully, that becomes the focus, and the first loss is legitimacy.
Next goes the ability to escalate...to what?
***
1) But if you make the focus the rightful and fair demands of people that the general public can identify with...NOT leaders! no leader today, of union/corporation/government is someone the public identifies with!
Get OUT of the ego biz...you can do anything IF you give credit to the right people, and that means LET THE RANK AND FILE MAKE THE SPEECHES...and put them in front of the cameras. The best leaders rarely show their faces...show people, again, taht the general public can identify with and whose demands are FAIR.
2) Low and slow and quiet and polite picketing...and for GOD'S sake, get some people who ACTUALLY can get the media to attend!
Aren't there ANY guerilla PR people with guts, initiatitive and imagination, or are they ALL subservient to the constipated minds of "Leaders"? The bully-boy who can rixse tot he top of a union of slink into the CEO's chair hasn't got a CLUE about how to get media attention, so shut up and do your leading but stay out of the attention biz...
3) The establishment...whee, how I love that term...the 'Haves' will fuck up. Beat people up, intimidate, bribe, jail, sneer...and thus LEGITIMATIZE cranking up the strike/picket line/march/sit-in...so THEN the movement, fully righteous in the eyes of the media-served public, can go to more full-court press.
The first moves of the dance make all the difference. Don't shoot your wad early, in other words. Slow... build...gather all the friends you can. Why? because this will go on in varying places and formats the rest of your lives...Posted by Leslie Victor Piper on 2011-10-29 07:16:38

I'm not sure that I agree with the author as the Huffington Post "boycott" was called without the benefit of educating the public sufficiently before calling the boycott. For example did any of the Huffington Post even seek union membership? I saw a few members of the Screen Actors Guild continue to write pieces for the Huffington Post despite the so-called boycott.
As to the struggle in Longview by the ILWU, well if our so-called labor laws were effective and carried out fairly the ILWU would not have had to resort to the tactics that they utilized. Furthermore depending on getting a "fair" hearing before the corporate controlled judicial system is as lame as depending on the NLRB to enforce labor laws! Also not much attention was given the scabbing by the Operating Engineers Union, a union that clearly has NO jurisdiction on the Pacific waterfront!
The Occupy Movement has taught many of us one thing: if we are to retain our rights, we must be willing to be attacked and jailed as the court system isn't going to do a damned thing to protect them for us!Posted by Pancho Valdez on 2011-10-28 22:13:06

Union kid, ex-Green Beret...I learned at strikes as a kid and I learned how movements are built...there are the OLD and the BOLD...if you want the MOVEMENT to live and get "OLD"...don't get bold too early.
And it's so smart to have no demands and 'leaders'...put the 1% on the spot, make THEM confront THEIR greed and inept cruelty and hardheartedness...
No demands means we ALL agree...because there's been no delineation for us to divide and disagree about...keep it loose, my beloved and admired younger brothers and sisters...how I respect you!
I'm hanging out in the dusty southwest, we will meet physically maybe, we meet in mind and online always. I am so proud again to be an American. Thank you, OWS...99%...and all...Posted by Leslie Victor Piper on 2011-10-27 07:37:35

From The Newspaper Guild's view, the Huffington Post action has been successful. HuffPost leadership has pledged to continue to work with us moving forward, with the shared understanding of the importance of paid journalism. That's why the Guild agreed to withdraw from the boycott. Here's an open statement to members and supporters: http://www.newsguild.org/index.php?ID=12512Posted by Sara Steffens on 2011-10-21 08:52:15

The union are and have been so scared and pussy whipped for so long we the tunion members are wondering if they stand or sit when they pee. Just mention any type of direct action and you can see the union "leadership" quivewr in cowardly fear! IT MAKE US MEMBERS ASHAMED.Posted by T O on 2011-10-20 13:47:19

About this Blog

"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more