Graphite: Time to Invest, or Flavor of the Day?

Graphite has been getting a lot of buzz recently, raising bullish expectations among some investors and even talk of a future bubble. Why? The price has risen steadily over the past couple of years and attracted a lot of attention. Let’s have a look at why some market participants are excited about this mineral and see if it’s worth our investment dollars.

Uses

Graphite is an important industrial mineral. As the US Geological Survey reports, "The major uses of natural graphite in 2011 were estimated to be refractory applications and crucibles combined, 33%; foundry operations and steelmaking combined, 26%; brake linings, 7%; batteries and lubricants combined, 5%; and other applications, 29%." There are different types of natural graphite, each having unique qualities that suit certain applications: crystalline flake graphite; amorphous; and lump graphite. The most desirable and expensive of all three is flake graphite, which is produced from less than a half of the world’s graphite mines and is suitable for high-tech applications. Only synthetic graphite produced from petroleum coke can serve as a substitute for costly flake, but that process is quite expensive due in part to high oil prices.

Although there are predictions about graphite demand exploding because of demand for lithium-ion batteries – where it’s used extensively – by the time electric cars powered by these batteries become popular enough to impact global automotive demand, there’s likely to be technology that will allow cheap production of synthetic graphite. More traditional uses of the mineral are the primary source of current graphite demand, which is mostly dependent upon the health of the global economy. From this standpoint, one must have an optimistic outlook on the economy to be bullish on graphite.

Looking out further, many believe that graphene will be the driver of graphite prices. Graphene is a material derived from graphite and can potentially be one of the strongest, lightest, and highly conductive materials currently known. While the opportunities graphene may open up are extraordinary, it’s too early to make any economic projections for it, especially considering thatsynthetic graphene has already been produced in a laboratory. This technological progress is good for society, but not so much for graphite mining companies and potentially their stock prices.

Another source of potential demand is in pebble-bed nuclear reactors. The hope is that these will become more efficient and safer than current reactors and hence more widespread. They would require a lot of graphite, but this spread of pebble-bed reactors has not actually happened yet.

Supply

The graphite market has been compared to the market for rare earth metals: they’re both deemed "critical" by several countries, and China – one of the world’s leading producers – has tightened supply. In fact, in 2011 about 65% of global graphite mine production came from China, followed by 15% from India. China holds 71% of the global graphite reserves, again followed by India with 14%.

Total annual graphite production is estimated at 1.1 million tonnes a year, and projections are that consolidation would take 100,000 tonnes per year production off the market. Amorphous graphite is cheap and is used in traditional industries, such as steelmaking – but if the supply of amorphous graphite falls, end buyers may have to consider switching to flake graphite, which is two to three times more expensive than amorphous. While amorphous graphite costs about US$500-800 per tonne, high-grade flake graphite can fetch as much as US$2,500 per tonne.

Demand for higher-grade graphite would provide additional motivation for miners and explorers – and also for R&D companies to invest in high-grade synthetic graphite.

If China takes the same approach to graphite as it did to rare earths, a politically orchestrated drop in production would likely spur the market’s interest in non-Chinese graphite mining companies, at least in the short term. From a more fundamental perspective, however, we’re reticent to bet on Chinese policies; in the 1990s, global graphite prices crashed when it flooded the market with its domestic output in an attempt to kill competition. As Louis James, our senior metals investment strategist, says, "China giveth and China taketh away."

Counterpoints

One cautionary argument about the graphite market is its size: it’s tiny. Smaller markets tend to be more volatile, which can be both positive and negative. A low-liquidity sector like graphite, where there are few companies and the price is still settled mostly via direct negotiations, could deliver outstanding gains if your timing is good. Equally possible is getting crushed by a sudden setback or change in market dynamics.

To be sure, companies are likely to bring more projects online if the current momentum for graphite persists. The timing is tricky, though; we’re at least half a decade away from the new technologies that many investors hope will create a tidal wave of demand for the mineral. These uses are simply not yet being deployed or do not appear to be as widespread as their advocates claim. Thus, placing bets now would require a boatload of patience, along with some confidence that both the finished technology and a strong economy will pan out before the companies invested in run out of steam.

Simply put, by the time a company discovers, develops, and builds a graphite mine, technology may have advanced to the point where prices are low or substitutes are found. A more compelling play in our opinion would be to explore investing in a synthetic graphite company.

(Editor’s note: Many more compelling speculations with high-profit potential will be revealed at theCasey Research Recovery Reality Check Summit in Weston Florida this weekend. And even though you may not be attending, you can still learn all about these under-the-radar plays with the Summit Audio Collection.)

Conclusion

From both technological and economic perspectives, we haven’t yet seen compelling evidence that would persuade us to consider graphite as the "mineral of the future." The factors frequently mentioned as bullish for graphite are mostly "what if" speculations, which border on sounding too good to be true. And as the saying goes, if something looks too good to be true, it probably is. If the new uses for graphite don’t come to fruition, current end users cannot be relied upon to drive the market for the mineral much higher, at least not in the near- to mid-term – not unless you think the global economy is about to explode into a major growth spurt.

We’d argue that since expectations play an important role in how markets view graphite companies, a lot of the upside in this sector has already been factored into their stock prices.

All this brings us to the realization that while graphite and its derivatives play an important role in the economy, they do not necessarily represent an ideal investment, at least at this point. This doesn’t mean, of course, that there’s not money to be made on graphite plays; graphite, rare earths, and lithium are all critical elements in our modern economy. But to be successful, we recommend looking beyond the buzz.

Current fundamentals – weak job markets, slow economic growth, ongoing sovereign debt crises, and the looming possibility of inflation – keep our interest at bay for right now industrial minerals. Their merits and praise may be well justified, but successful speculators must distinguish fundamentals from fashion.

For over a quarter of a century, legendary investor and best-selling author Doug Casey and his team at Casey Research have been helping self-directed investors to earn superior returns through innovative investment research designed to take advantage of market dislocations.

you go on about synthetics but are simply making an assumption that synthetic graphite will replace everything. You don’t even know the price of synthetic graphite today or you are not willing to divulge it to the minions. I think you make some valid points but there is a clear argument that there is a supply problem and you simply say that synthetics will solve all problems going forward don’t worry about it.

That was pretty retarded.

Mark says 7 years ago

The energy cost component of synthetic graphite puts a base level on it that will leave natural graphite a cheaper alternative until oil goes back to $20. You are right to be wary of substitutable mineral forms, but wrong in applying it so strongly to graphite.