What’s Wrong with the Geneva Accord

The Geneva Accord is not adequate as it is three serious flaws:

It advocates disarming the terror organizations. I don’t
see how it can be done efficiently and the right to bear
arms also come to mind. I would advocate the opposite: give
arms to each and every Palestinian. That way, they will be
less afraid of the terror organizations, who in turn would
be much more afraid of them. (you could allow all Israelis
to carry arms as well, for good measure.)

It advocates forcibly evacuating the Israeli settlements. By
all means the Israeli Settlers have a right to live there as
every lawful person has a right to live anywhere. The entire
concept of immigration regulation and “fathers’ land” is
wrong.

What is wrong is forcing other people to protect them living
there. (as force is always wrong) This distinction must be
understood and followed.

Last, but probably most important is that it requires the
mutual cooperation of both sides. One cannot expect the other
side to follow his part of the deal, while my suggestion does
not require the cooperation of the Palestinians.