That is exactly the type of things I fear...... Look at fukishima and chernoble, when things go wrong, they go horribly wrong it seems. I think it
would be smarter to harness the natural energy of the earth, that is my opinion.

Good point-I mean they thought fission reactors would be totally safe and clean,but like you said..Fukushima.
And this tech is essentially about replicating what happens inside a star,so it sounds as though it has at least the potential to be very dangerous if
it goes wrong.

I would go with salt pile thorium reactors myself,with a lot of solar banks in the deserts of the world.
Job done,energy for everyone,without the potential catastrophe.
(plus thorium reactors can "digest" stockpiles of spent mox fuel,rendering it safe)
No brainer or what???

Good point-I mean they thought fission reactors would be totally safe and clean,but like you said..Fukushima.
And this tech is essentially about replicating what happens inside a star,so it sounds as though it has at least the potential to be very dangerous if
it goes wrong.

I would go with salt pile thorium reactors myself,with a lot of solar banks in the deserts of the world.
Job done,energy for everyone,without the potential catastrophe.
(plus thorium reactors can "digest" stockpiles of spent mox fuel,rendering it safe)
No brainer or what???

It's default is to shut down - you would just have to stop feeding it to halt the process. It also needs to operate at specific pressure levels and
temperatures for the process to continue. Unlike fission whereby a runaway reaction can take place - this is not possible with this method to the best
of my limited knowledge.

I personaly think this method will stand a greater possibility then the NIF. Still a long ways off but
at least it is being built.

I agree. Tremendous promise. Those Tonamak reactors look incredibly futuristic. Some key decisions will have to be finalized regarding ultimate design
but they are getting there.

Exciting stuff.

I would love to see megastructures do a documentary on how the potential tech would look like once up and running. Something like they did imagining
what it would entail in bridging the berring straight.

The BBC did an interesting documentary on the state of current fusion technology. It was removed for youtube but can be found here if you haven`t seen
it yet.
Here is the link:
BBC: Can We Make A Star On Earth ?Can We Make A Star On Earth ?

Professor Brian Cox takes a global journey in search of the energy source of the future. Called nuclear fusion, it is the process that fuels the sun
and every other star in the universe. Yet despite over five decades of effort, scientists have been unable to get even a single watt of fusion
electricity onto the grid. Brian returns to Horizon to find out why.

Granted extraordinary access to the biggest and most ambitious fusion experiments on the planet, Brian travels to the USA to see a high security
fusion bomb testing facility in action and is given a tour of the world’s most powerful laser.

In South Korea, he clambers inside the reaction chamber of K-Star, the world’s first super-cooled, super-conducting fusion reactor where the fate of
future fusion research will be decided. Nuclear fusion is nature’s power source. From the Sun to the most distant stars, the energy that lights up
the Universe is released by sticking hydrogen nuclei together to make helium. Since hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe, it seems
sensible to ask whether we might endeavor to do the same and power ourselves out of our serious energy crisis by building stars on Earth. The problem
of course is that stars are big and hot; the Sun is the size of a million Earths, and burns six hundred million tonnes of hydrogen fuel every
second.

Nothing like creating a miniature sun, because nothing bad could come of that

In all seriousness, its a interesting development.

I also agree with the post above, how long before someone decides to drop a self sustaining fusion bomb..

8

Yes and what is even scarier is as they ramp this up is one you start it you can't stop it. There is on switch to stop it. This should scare the
hell out of everyone. Get it wrong, way wrong, and you are no longer talking free energy but end of the world stuff, lol.

I agree though we will never see it, Livermore is the R and D arm for the military. Greed will make sure the people never get free energy.

Yeah, I kinda feel like we should really be harnessing the sun's energy to full potential, before we are messing around trying to create our own
"mini suns" with nuclear reactions and such. Imagine what kinda crazy tech we could come up with if the military complex was shut down, and half
that money was diverted into energy research

They're celebrating the fact that they did get a measurable output of about 8kj but it took an input like1.7Mj to achieve that so the overall
efficiency is something like 0.5% or less. That's a very long way from break even, let alone overunity but it IS a result indicating fusion if only
fleeting.

Yes and what is even scarier is as they ramp this up is one you start it you can't stop it.
The Bot

Balderdash. In inertial confinement fusion, you drop in little pellets of fuel, and smack them with a laser. The pellet fuses (they would like that to
happen, anyway) and you get a pulse of energy back. Hopefully more than you put in to ignite the fusion reaction in the pellet. You get to keep the
difference.

Silcone Synapse
And this tech is essentially about replicating what happens inside a star,so it sounds as though it has at least the potential to be very dangerous if
it goes wrong.

Not at all. Stars have huge amounts of fuel to work with. With ICF, you just stop dropping fuel pellets. With a Tokamak, you turn off the external
heat and fuel feed. Or drop the magnetic field and let the plasma hit the wall. There's not that much hydrogen in a Tokamak, it's not like it can
become some sort of standalone Sun out in Sheboygan or something.

NIF isn't supposed to be a production facility, anyway. What they're trying to do is find out how to get ICF to work at all. What are the problems?
What secondary effects are preventing this from working? How much energy do you have to put into the thing to get it to work? What's the best pellet
design?

On and on. There is just a metric crap ton of research that has to be done, and to do it, you have to have a really trick facility that can meet or
exceed the energy and precision that ends up being required. If it's not at least that good, the facility is worthless, since you'll never achieve
an end result to optimize.

So, hopefully, NIF is an overkill. They'll work out the bugs, find what you minimally need to pull this off, and THEN it's time to build a test
power plant. Because NIF ain't that.

OTOH, if NIF isn't sufficient to do the job, it's an expensive paperweight.

It's never going to work because what they are doing is based on a flawed model for the mechanism behind stars. The electric sun models are more
likely correct, that it is why they are using huge amounts of electricity to get their fusion. It will always be a net loss, and they will blindly
waste billions more chasing the elusive overunity fusion reaction.
Not much different when they claimed they "created" a "blackhole" at CERN, how much electricity did that failed experiment take?

PplVSNWO
It's never going to work because what they are doing is based on a flawed model for the mechanism behind stars. The electric sun models are...

total bollocks. For further reference, see any photo of a thermonuclear explosion. Also, if you've got the time, energy, and money, you can build
your own home fusion reactor. It's heinously inefficient, but it'll fuse, and you can use it for a kickass neutron source. Putting the immediate lie
to the "electric universe".

At one time, you could cross Daimler's palm with some silver and buy one commercially:

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.