Agenda-Driven Response: HAARP and the Army's Land-Grab in Colorado

Unfortunately, despite the
government's responsibility to protect citizen's rights, it is blatantly
obvious that the government is following an alternative, deliberately
destructive agenda including: rural cleansing of the resource-producing
population, economic destabilization, runaway inflation, unrestrained
immigration, illegal surveillance, the NAU, deteriorating infrastructure,
ethnic disparity, de-population through war, disease, toxicity, and
chemtrails; selective response to "natural" disasters, destruction of the
middle class, seizure of private property and obliteration of God-given
liberties - all at the hands of an elite ruling class - crony monopoly
capitalists and war profiteers, intent on stealing and controlling the
earth's resources, a contrived diminishing food supply and the surviving
useless eaters, still obedient and moderately productive. What happened
to that illusive balance of power?

At the president's discretion, along with those covert councils who
supervise him, and without congressional or constitutional oversight,
fifteen Executive Branch Secretaries control all federal bureaucracies
which exert dictatorial power over every aspect of our lives. These
agencies and their many sub-agencies facilitate U.N. programs including
Agenda 21,
developed during the Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in
Rio de Janeiro, June 3-14, 1992. These regulatory, metastasized
Departments are: Agriculture (1889), Commerce (1903), Defense (1947),
Education (1979), Energy (1977), Health and Human Services (1953),
Homeland Security (November 25, 2002, absorbed FEMA in 2003 which was
created by Presidential Order on April 1, 1979), Housing and Urban
Development (1965), Interior (1849), Labor (1913), State (1789),
Transportation (1967), Treasury (1789), and Veterans Affairs (1988), and
the Attorney General (1789).1

Significantly, under the Bilderberg-approved George W. Bush,
cabinet-level status was granted to the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, created December 2, 1970) and to
the U.S. Trade Representative (1962).2 In addition to power over our children through
education, price of gas through manipulation of energy, etc., this allows
a sitting president to bypass Congress regarding anything and everything
that has to do with the environment - a veritable Pandora's Box. With
cabinet-level status for the Trade Representative, the president may sign
treaties without congressional approval. A declaration of war, once
required, was quietly disbanded with the current, unconstitutional king's
cabinet structure.

The elevation of the EPA was first attempted in March 1990 under G. H. W.
Bush. He wanted it in time to celebrate Earth Day on April 22,
1990.3 Clinton also
attempted to empower the EPA which, like FEMA and Nixon's 1972 Regional
Councils, is divided into ten regions (for better control) - see
maps. The EPA declares its Agenda 21 commitment, as noted on the web
site.

The Army makes it perfectly clear that it intends to seize private
property in southeastern Colorado. They don't "need" the land for
training purposes - that is a pretext. They have sufficient mega military
training bases in Iraq (along with the world's biggest and most
expensive embassy), also on plundered land. The power of eminent domain
is an oft-used seizure tactic; there are others. On February 4, 2008, Not 1 More
Acre!, advocates for the beleaguered citizens of southeastern
Colorado, said: "The Pentagon and its military contractors are continuing
to push plans to more than triple the size of the Piñon Canyon
Maneuver Site in southeastern Colorado - in contravention of a law passed
by Congress which forbids them to do so."

Remember, the Pentagon and the Department of Defense, since 1947, are
under the jurisdiction of the king's cabinet. Congressional leaders,
frequently indebted to campaign contributors and deep-pocketed lobbyists,
go through the legislative motions and pass laws they can't or won't
enforce. Many sincere officials are out-numbered by the compliant
power-loving majority, who long ago abdicated their sworn
responsibilities - just like those who handed America's financial
resources to the Federal Reserve private bankers - the internationalist
bankers who currently manage the president, his cabinet, elections and
the monopoly media's talking heads.

Despite sounding conspiratorial, it is a fact that the U.S. has the
capability of manipulating "the climate for military use." They have
applied those "modification techniques" for "more than half a century"
covertly maneuvering "weather patterns, communications and electric power
systems as a weapon of global warfare, enabling the U.S. to disrupt and
dominate entire regions" - against "enemy countries, friendly nations" or
even, dare I say, the U.S. to "destabilize economies, ecosystems and
agriculture."4

According to a top-secret congressional hearing held March 20, 1974, the
military used weather modification in Vietnam and by 1977 was spending
$2.8 million a year on weather-modification research; the same year that
the United Nations banned the "hostile use of all environmental
modification techniques." Allegedly, the U.S. discontinued all
weather-modification research in 1979.5

HAARP, initiated in 1992 by Advanced Power Technologies, Inc. (APTI), a
subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Corporation (ARCO) "was developed as
part of an Anglo-American partnership between Raytheon Corporation "which
owns the HAARP patents, and British Aerospace Systems (BAES). The HAARP
project is one among several collaborative ventures in advanced weapons
systems between the two defense giants. APTI (including the HAARP
patents) was sold by ARCO to E-Systems Inc, in 1994."6

"BAES was involved in the development of the advanced stage of the HAARP
antenna array under a 2004 contract with the Office of Naval Research.
The installation of 132 high frequency transmitters was entrusted by BAES
to its U.S. subsidiary, BAE Systems Inc. and their Electronic Warfare
division. In September 2007, BAE Systems Inc. received the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) top award for "outstanding
leadership and engineering innovation in designing, constructing, and
activating the Defense Department's High-Frequency Active Auroral
Research Program (HAARP) instrument." "HAARP, the world's largest and
most capable ionospheric research facility, will serve the U.S.
scientific and defense communities for the next 30 to 50 years." HAARP
was dedicated June 27, 2007 and is "jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force,
U.S. Navy, and DARPA.78

The Department of Defense and the CIA, the president's enforcement
agencies, has contracts with E-Systems, founded in 1964. The CIA is "the
intelligence-gathering and covert-action arm of the president." It is not
"some sort of independently run mythical loose cannon."9 E-Systems, owned by
war-profiteer Raytheon since 1994, "manufactures and distributes
electronic systems and communications networks, including electronic
warfare equipment, navigation and reconnaissance machinery, and highly
sophisticated spying devices."10 In the early 1970s, E-Systems installed
communications equipment on the President's Air Force One.11 This created an
airborne command post for the Pentagon and the White House. This
"Doomsday Plane" enables the president to manage a nuclear war.12

Although, there is no hard evidence that HAARP has or will be used for
military purposes, the involvement of the Department of Defense would
decidedly suggest such use. After all, they are not recognized for life
and health improvement studies. Advanced technology and weaponry would
provide ample opportunities to achieve their ultimate "full spectrum dominance," including the "globalization of
the world's economy."13

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "has a mandate 'to
assess scientific, technical and socioeconomic information relevant for
the understanding of climate change.' This mandate includes environmental
warfare. 'Geo-engineering' is acknowledged, but the underlying military
applications are neither the object of policy analysis or scientific
research in the thousands of pages of IPCC reports and supporting
documents, based on the expertise and input of some 2,500 scientists,
policymakers and environmentalists."14 How convenient - just ignore the horrific
possibilities and implications.

HAARP was unable to detect the "precise location of tunnels and
underground shelters which was defined as a "serious weakness in the
Department of Defense plans for precision attacks on hardened targets and
for counter proliferation." Therefore, increased funding of $75 million a
year was allotted, in May 1994, for further research.15

Residents of southeastern Colorado had already suffered through seven
years of drought, accompanied by major financial losses due to the
skyrocketing cost of hay, for which there was no assistance.16 Benefits, financial or
otherwise, are typically and repeatedly extended to well-connected
corporations - rarely to independent, struggling producers.

Then in December 2006, two back to back blizzards delivered record snow
volume of 3 to 4 feet, with snow drifts as high as 10 to 18 feet causing
financial losses of at least $500 million, economically devastating the
people.17 During
the storms, between 10,000 and 15,000 cattle perished from starvation and
exposure. The numbers increased as the snow melted and more carcasses
were revealed. The area affected was home to "345,000 head of cattle and
calves, 23,500 head of producing sows and 112,000 head of sheep and
lambs."18
Livestock contributes 70% to Colorado's agricultural gross
product."19

The record storms forced "the closures of Interstate Highways 25, 76 and
70, as well as U.S. Routes 350, 36 and 85." Following Holiday Blizzards I
and II, as they were named, more than a foot of additional snow fell on
January 4-5, bringing the total snowfall for 16 days to more than 80
inches in some areas.20

On January 16, 2007, newly elected Governor Bill Ritter wrote to U.S.
Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns asking for federal "financial
assistance to offset livestock and agricultural losses and to help
prevent additional cattle deaths." Additionally, he sought funds to "help
cover" the costs of "snow removal and emergency rescue operations."
Ritter wanted the USDA to "declare the following counties disaster areas:
Baca, Bent, Cheyenne, Crowley, Huerfano, Kiowa, Las Animas, Lincoln,
Otero and Prowers counties,"21 some of the same land that the Army had
targeted for seizure.

The federal government offered emergency "loans" to the ranchers and
farmers, people who already had burdensome bank loans.22 The state also offered
funds for "the rescue and recovery of livestock." But, the most immediate
help came from other ranchers - neighbors helping neighbors. Legislation
was approved for those who suffered livestock losses based on a
presidential disaster declaration. Ranchers then counted on federal
help.23

Unfortunately, there were restrictions. According to their disaster
declarations, "thousands of dead cattle" apparently were not "enough of a
disaster" for the U.S. Department of Agriculture who "denied disaster
relief and the attendant low-interest loans" to the ten Army-targeted
counties devastated by the blizzards in southeast Colorado.24 Lack of assistance
might force some discouraged ranchers to sell their land. Although
ranchers were not "holding their breath" for state or federal relief,
such relief was desired and somewhat expected, given other disaster
declarations programs instigated by FEMA and the USDA.25

Governor Ritter expressed disappointment over assistance conditions that
were impossible to meet. It was an additional setback to ranchers and
farmers who watched their livelihoods dissolve after "prolonged drought
followed by devastating storms." Ritter, along with a state delegation
appealed the USDA decision against granting low-interest loans. However,
the ranchers had "sustained such terrific losses that more bank loans"
would not have kept "them from going under."26

The Emergency Farm Relief Act of 2007, in the works for several years,
would have provided payments to ranchers for livestock losses due to
floods, wildfires, hurricanes and blizzards. However, USDA denial was
based on its assessment that the counties had not suffered 30 percent
production losses - not economic losses."27 "One factor leading to the limited assistance
was that livestock do not fall under USDA crop disaster designations,
since livestock are not a crop."28

Additionally, freezing rain during those December 2006 storms resulted in
"significant ice accumulation" causing "tens of thousands of people" in
the five affected states to lose electrical power, "paralyzing much of
the Great Plains. Ice accumulation also downed trees and communication
towers."29

"The worst victims of the December storms, particularly in Colorado's
High Plains, were cattle; thousands were trapped by heavy snow and strong
winds, which created drifts up to 20 feet in some areas. Strong north
winds caused unbelievable blizzard conditions, with drifts as tall as
two-story buildings."30

That blizzard may affect cattle reproduction for years to come. Bulls
experienced reproductive problems "due to frozen testicles." Cows whose
embryos died in early pregnancy due to the cold were vulnerable to deadly
infections. Large numbers of "stillborn or aborted calves" resulted in a
decreased "number of replacement females. Such reproductive problems
resulting from the blizzard may have an economic impact for the next
three to five years."31

Some hay deliveries arrived weeks later, too late for the deceased cows.
"Some ranchers felt the distribution could have been timelier in
execution. Ranchers and farmers have not received federal disaster relief
and emergency aid, such as money for livestock rescue and
recovery."32 Too
little, too late - just like New Orleans and currently, Iowa. FEMA
immediately responded on 9/11. Debris, which may have provided evidence,
was hurriedly cleared away, an anomaly in such circumstances. The EPA,
also very quickly, declared that the toxic air was harmless. People,
trusting authority, accepted the falsehood. Many individuals developed
serious health problems and have since died.

Colorado applicants for assistance had to leap through numerous hoops despite very public, appeasing, sympathetic
rhetoric and philanthropic performances associated with the Presidential
Snow Emergency Declarations. One may view the After Action Report. Yes, folks, we can trust the government
- NOT!

About the Author

Deanna Spingola has been a quilt designer and is
the author of two books. She has traveled extensively teaching and
lecturing on her unique methods. She has always been an avid reader
of non-fiction works designed to educate rather than entertain. She
is active in family history research and lectures on that topic.
Currently she is the director of the local Family History Center.
She has a great interest in politics and the direction of current
government policies, particularly as they relate to the
Constitution. Deanna's Web
Site