As described in this AP story as "snarky," the federal 7th Circuit Court of Appeals took six pages to deny a convicted murderer at the Green Bay Correctional Institute his request to hang a "commercially published photograph" of Jennifer Aniston, such as the one at left, in his cell.

The opening: "Jennifer Aniston: television ('Friends') star; actress in several forgettable ('Rumor Has It' and 'Along Came Polly') recent films; former wife of Brad Pitt; and anointed as a hottie by 'FHM Magazine' ...

A footnote about the photo being free of indecent content: "That's good. In 2000, Aniston sued 'Celebrity Skin' magazine for publishing photos taken of her while sunbathing topless in her own backyard!"

The suggestion the inmate, Jevon Jackson (more on him in a few lines), subscribe to magazines to get around the prison's ban on stand-alone photograph ordering: "While that might not guarantee an image of Aniston in every issue, the likelihood of an eventual photograph of her is sufficiently high to suffice as an alternative. See generally Tarpley v. Allen County, Indiana, 312 F.3d 895, 899 (7th Cir. 2002) (noting that prisons are only obligated to 'make reasonable efforts' to accommodate First Amendment rights. Note, however, that Tarpley involved something much more important than a photograph of Jennifer Aniston—it involved religious issues as the inmate there wanted his own Bible.)"

A footnote about that suggestion: "If possessing a photo of a movie star in a prison cell can even be deemed a "right" protected by the First Amendment."

He's eligible for parole at age 101, according to news coverage at the time. Handing down that sentence, Milwaukee Circuit Judge David A. Hansher told Jackson, "I can only pray that after you die, you endure some personal hell for what you did."

INTERACTIVE: This interactive provides a detailed look at the current term of the U.S. Supreme Court, including summaries of major cases, profiles of the justices, and legal alignments based on past decisions.