Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Alphatec Spine’s Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year End 2013 Results Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode, later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. (Operator Instructions) As a remainder this call is being recorded, if you have any objections you may disconnect at this time.

I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference, Ms. Christine Zedelmayer, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Christine Zedelmayer

Good afternoon and welcome to Alphatec Spine’s quarterly update conference call to discuss our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2013 financial and operating results. This conference call contains forward-looking statements and involved risks and uncertainties including statements regarding the Company’s expectations regarding its financial performance, strategies for revenue growth, development of new products, customer acceptance of the Company’s products and overall trends in economic conditions in the Company’s market.

The Company undertakes no obligation to update the information presented on the conference call. Actual results could differ material from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risk factors. For more information for our potential factors that affect our business and financial results, we suggest you review our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Throughout the conference call the Company will reference some financial metrics those derived in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP. For other metrics are not in accordance with GAAP. This approach is consistent with how management measures the Company’s results internally.

However, non-GAAP results are not in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to non-GAAP information provided by other companies. Non-GAAP information should be considered as supplement to and not as a substitute for financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our reconciliation of a non-GAAP information to the corresponding GAAP measures is in the press release that was filed today prior to this conference call.

Thank you, Christine. Good day everyone and welcome to Alphatec Spine’s conference call to discuss our fourth quarter and year end financials and operations. This afternoon our comments will build on both press releases issued earlier today. In the interest of providing ample time to review and discuss our results as well as our settlement of the OrthoTec matter and the Deerfield credit agreement that we’ve announced today. We will shorten our comments regarding 2014 and give further comments on our first quarter call, which should be held before the end of April.

After my introductory remarks, Michael provide additional details on the fourth quarter and full year financial results and provide more details on the outlook and guidance for 2014.

2013 was a pivotal year for Alphatec, and I’m very pleased by the record results of the organization delivered. During the last two years, our strategy has been to strategically improve the overall operations of the Company in order to strengthen sales and overall profitability.

I’m very proud to say that 2013 demonstrated our ability to deliver and execute to that strategy. We have streamlined our R&D process to deliver valuable, innovative solutions into the marketplace. We’ve also strengthened our U.S. and international sales leadership. At the same time we continue to seek to increase our bottom line probability by implementing operational efficiencies and effectiveness throughout the supply chain manufacturing an all back-office operations.

We feel as though our strong execution in 2013 establish positive momentum for us to grow the business in 2014 and provides us with an extraordinary opportunity to maximize shareholder and stakeholder value this year and beyond. We will provide more details about our strategy for 2014 later in the call.

However, before I provide these key highlights for our fourth quarter’s performance, I would like to provide an update on the press release we issued this afternoon regarding our settlement with OrthoTec.

In February, we announced that a California jury had delivered $47.9 million verdict plus interest against Scient'x subsidiary, Surgiview. In the OrthoTec versus Surgiview litigation, we also noted that a second trial would be scheduled in 60 day of the jury verdict to determine if Alphatec could be held responsible for the damages assessed against Surgiview.

Today, we announced that we have reached a global settlement agreement with OrthoTec for $49 million, pursuant to the settlement the parties provide each other with mutual releases and a dismissal of all OrthoTec related litigation matters in which the Company and its affiliates and directors are defendants.

While we remain confident in the strength of our arguments we believe that settling the matter expeditiously is in the long-term best interest of all stakeholders, removing this long standing legal matter today removes a significant level of current and future uncertainty. It eliminates further distractions across the organization and reduces our future legal expenses and human resources associated with continuing a very lengthy litigation process.

Based on our future cash flow projections in addition to the funding that we announced today from Deerfield and the support from our senior creditor, MidCap Financial’s, we believe in our ability to meet both the short-term and long-term obligations set forth in the settlement agreement. We were able to settle this in a structured long-term manner, that provides for a one-time upfront payment of $17.5 million in the second quarter of 2014 and quarterly payments beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014 of $1.1 million or $4.4 million per year for the next seven years. In Mike’s section he will discuss the terms of the new debt facility in more detail.

With that behind us, I would like to now take a moment to reflect upon the numerous accomplishments that we achieved during the course of the fourth quarter and full year of 2013. Q4 represented another strong quarter for revenue performance, our record quarter in fact here at Alphatec.

Q4 2013 revenue totaled $53.1 million and represented approximately 1% growth over the fourth quarter of 2012 or 3.4% growth on a constant currency basis. We are pleased with this result given some of the expected softness in our international revenues as a result of our Q3 decision to discontinue commercial operations in France and the loss of our PureGen product. As well as continued core implant pricing and reimbursement headwinds in the global spine market.

Our EBITDA in Q4 represented an all time record for us as well. Coming in at $7.5 million or 41% of revenues, this was up 51% over the fourth quarter of 2012 and over a 11.5% growth sequentially from the third quarter of 2013. This now represents five solid quarters of operational execution and delivering strong results in this challenging spine market.

This demonstrates that our internal transformation has gained traction and created the positive forward momentum that we believe we’ll fuel our journey and strengthen our competitive position in the global spine market, and ultimately drive stakeholder values.

I’m also pleased to report our record year of revenues for Alphatec, for the full year 2013 revenues totaled approximately $205 million on a reported basis, trending well ahead of 2012 by over 4% or over 7% on a constant currency basis.

We have achieved this year-over-year growth despite having to cover contribution losses associated with the drop of sales in France, and the removal of our PureGen product from the market for most of 2013. Likewise our financial discipline and focus on streamlining operations have delivered a record annual adjusted EBITDA for 2013. We delivered over $25 million on annual adjusted EBITDA representing over 12% of revenue and a growth of over 27% over 2012.

I’m extremely pleased with these results as they demonstrate our commitment to building a track record of operational execution and delivering consistent reliable results.

Mike will cover the financial results in greater details in a few moments. We are pleased with our U.S. revenue performance in the fourth quarter and the full year. U.S. revenues for the fourth quarter were $35.7 million and represented approximately 5% growth over the fourth quarter of 2012. Excluding the effects of our discontinuation of PureGen in early 2013, our U.S. revenue was up 10.5% quarter-over-quarter.

U.S. hospital non-biologic implant revenue was up almost 20% year-over-year and 6% sequentially. On an annual basis U.S. revenue for 2013 were $135 million, representing a 3.4% growth over 2012. When adjusted for PureGen, U.S net revenues grew 8.3% over 2012. This positive performance was the result of continued solid unit volume gains in our core hospital business and increased surgeon uptake across all our various product lines.

In addition, our international business continues to deliver strong result. As we have previously discussed, our decision to restructure our commercial operations in France, also includes discontinuing sales of Alphatec and Scient’x products in that country as well. We anticipate some softening in our French business as a result of this announcement. However, moving forward, we expect to trade-off an amount of unprofitable revenue in the near future from France in exchange for an annualized increase in EBITDA by $6 million to $7 million, which begins in the second half of this year.

With this backdrop international net revenues for the fourth quarter was $17.4 million, down 7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2012, or up almost 1% on a constant currency basis. When this is adjusted for contribution from France and the impact of currency international revenues grew 4% versus the same period in 2012. Overall, international revenues for the full year of 2013 totaled $69.8 million, representing 6% growth as reported and 15% growth on a constant currency basis. In 2013, international revenues accounted for 34% of our total revenue.

Japan represents our largest international business, where we currently hold a top four-market share position. Our Japanese business continues to consistently deliver strong growth with revenues of over $28.4 million in 2013, representing again impressive 19.4% growth on a constant currency basis. This growth is the result of surgeon uptake and adoption of our minimally invasive products, Illico Minimally Invasive and Illico Multi-level as well as the recent adoption of our Novel PEEK spacer system.

Europe continues to have double-digit revenue growth and recent product and instrument approvals in Brazil and China will lay the expansion of our business in those markets.

Looking forward, we will continue to seek to deepen our international penetration, while expanding in the select markets in Latin America and Asia-Pacific, which we believe represents the future growth opportunities for our innovative products.

I am very proud of our international leadership team and our distribution partners. Their focus on market expansion, research and training and a commitment to advancing our international business, continues to reinforce Alphatec as a competitive participant in the global spine market.

We are also very pleased with the performance of our product portfolio in 2013 and the pull through opportunity for those products in the coming year. We endeavor to continue again solid traction with surgeon adoption of Alphatec Solus, our latest interbody fusion device, as well as our Illico Minimally Invasive surgery platform, including Illico Multi-level instruments for the longer constructs, the BridgePoint Spinous Process Fixation.

As I’ve previously mentioned a key strategic focus for Alphatec last year and continuing to 2014 is on minimally and less invasive surgery platforms and product coupled with the positive benefits of biologics to promote bone healing and spinal fusion.

We believe that this clearly a trend in the industry as it benefits the patients, hospitals and the surgeons alike, and we have some exceptional products that fit very nicely in this growing area. In fact our minimally invasive product portfolio grew other 26% in the U.S. in the fourth quarter and 20% globally for the full year of 2013.

Expanding our international market share through registration and approval and launch of key Alphatec products is a significant lever for our growth strategy for 2014 and beyond. We continue to actively pursue international registrations, and I’m pleased to report that we have received over 80 international approvals in 2013.

At the end of the fourth quarter Epicage systems approved in Brazil. We also received approval in China for our DiscoCerv our motion preservation cervical disc prosthesis product. Latin America and China represent significant market growth opportunities for us and we anticipate additional approvals in these regions for our Alphatec products in the first half of 2014.

Training is another important of area of focus for us internationally, and to attract and retain surgeons. We have trained close to 400 surgeons globally in 2013, and just recently hosted our first training lab for surgeons from Mexico and Brazil. These accomplishments again a testament to the tremendous progress and to the commitment we have to innovation and expansion of our product portfolio.

To drive future profitability we continue to deliver signification improvements in our vertical integrated global manufacturing and supply chain operations. The significant strides we made over the last 18 months in leaning out our inventory, reducing lead times, appropriately managing with and substantially reducing back orders are the foundations for driving future operational leverage. Coupled with these improvements our strategic decision to restructure our French operation, which was difficult but necessary to yield long-term positive benefits for the overall gross margin of our business.

We are well underway with the restructuring transition of the operations and remain on target to start delivering annualized increase of $6 million to $7 million to EBITDA beginning in the second half of this year. Even though we have experienced top line pressure associated with the industry headwinds of pricing and reimbursement in 2013, we have been able to drive meaningful leverage and manage our cost structure accordingly. I’m pleased with the tremendous progress that we’ve made operationally to improve our bottom line and drive efficiencies within the business.

To summarize Q4 was a record finish to a very successful year for Alphatec. We achieved solid growth in a challenging market, increased operational efficiencies, and effectiveness while advancing our portfolio of innovative products. Our 2013 results provide proof that we have driven our performance to higher levels and established a canvas for delivering consistent repeatable results.

At this time I would like to invite Mike O'Neill, our Chief Financial Officer, to provide additional comments around the fourth quarter. Mike?

Michael O'Neill

Thank you, Les. As Les has already provided the key revenue highlights both the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2013, I will focus the majority of my remarks on the reported operating performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2013. I’ll then provide full year 2014 guidance.

As it’s quite clear from the press release today, there is a significant number of moving parts impacting our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2013. I encourage you to look at the non-GAAP reconciliation tables accompanying our press release for more detailed information. These measures represent important metrics that we use to manage the ongoing operations of the business. As I go through this review there are a number of adjustments that I will need to highlight in order to give you a better understanding of the underlying performance.

Before I provide additional details on the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2013, I’d like to provide some additional commentary with respect to the OrthoTec settlement and the debt facility with Deerfield that we announced earlier today. Under the terms of the secured loan facility with Deerfield, Alphatec has the option to draw up to $50 million in one or more increments by January 30, 2015. This facility matures in five years at an interest rate of 8.75%, payable quarterly in cash following the execution of a drawdown.

Alphatec issued Deerfield 6.25 million warrants upon initial execution of the facility and will issue an additional 10 million warrants on a pro rata basis as the facility is drawn down. With each disbursement, Deerfield will receive a transaction fee equal to 2.5% of the amount disbursed. I’d like to take the opportunity to thank both Deerfield and MidCap Financial for their flexibility and commitment to the future success of Alphatec.

I also want to reiterate the earlier comments from Les that the company is comfortable with forward-looking cash flow and covenant projections that will allow the company to service the new incremental debt as well as the financial obligations associated with the OrthoTec settlement.

Moving to gross profit and gross margin, the gross profit for Q4 2013 was $35.3 million or 66.4% of revenue, compared to $32.1 million or 60.9% of revenue in Q4 2012. After adjusting for the French restructuring of $1.1 million, overall gross profit improved to $36.4 million or 68.6% of revenue, which compares favorably with both the prior year and the sequential quarter’s performance.

U.S. gross margin was 74.4% in Q4 2013, compared to 66.3% in Q4 2012 and 69.0% in Q3 of 2013, demonstrating continued underlying performance improvement. International gross margin on a reported basis was 50.1% for Q4 of 2013 compared to 51.1% in Q4 2012. After adjusting for charges to cost of goods sold incurred as part of the French restructuring, the international gross margin for Q4 was 57.1%.

Gross margin for the full year 2013 was 60.7% compared to a prior year of 63.1%. A cumulative restructuring cost in France and for PureGen that we wrote off in Q3, overall gross margin for the year would have been 65.2%.

U.S. gross margins were 67.7% for the full year, compared to 68.5% full year 2012. After adjusting for the PureGen write off, our full year U.S. gross margin would have been 70.3%.

International gross margins were 47.3% for the full year of 2013 compared to 52.3% in 2012. After adjusting for charges incurred as part of our French restructuring, the gross margin for the full year would have been 55.4%.

Total operating cost expenses for Q4 2013 were $91.3 million, an increase of $55.1 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2012. Excluding the OrthoTec settlement costs of $46 million, trial-related expenses of $3.7 million and French restructuring costs of $5.6 million, our underlying operating expenses of $36.4 million were essentially flat when compared to the $36.1 million in Q4 of 2012. The operating expense reconciliation is included in the non-GAAP condensed consolidated statement of operations table in our financial schedules accompanying this press release.

Total operating expenses for full year 2013 were $197.8 million, an increase of $64.2 million compared to the full year 2012 of $133.6 million. Excluding the aforementioned fourth quarter costs and previously recorded third quarter French restructuring costs, our underlying operating expenses were $137.8 million.

The year-on-year increase of $4.2 million in operating expenses is essentially the result of legal expenses incurred in the first nine months of the year directly associated with the OrthoTec legal matter.

Adjusted EBITDA, a measure we guide to, was a record $7.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 or 14.1% of revenues compared to the $5 million or 9.4% of revenues reported in the fourth quarter of 2012. Similarly, we achieved record adjusted EBITDA of $25.2 million for full year 2013 or 12.3% of revenues compared with the $19.9 million or 10.1% of revenues reported for 2012.

Please note that adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter and full year of 2013 excludes settlement expenses, trial-related litigation expense and French restructuring expenses as outlined in the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures table in our financial schedules accompanying the press release.

Net loss when adjusted for litigation and restructuring previously mentioned as well as other non-GAAP adjustments was $1.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2013 or negative $0.02 per share, compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $1.4 million or negative $0.01 per share for the fourth quarter of 2012.

Non-GAAP net loss for the full year of 2013 was $2.3 million or negative $0.02 per share compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $0.5 million or negative $0.01 per share the full year 2012.

Cash and cash equivalents were $21.3 million at December 31, 2013, compared to $22.2 million reported at December 31, 2012.

With that, I would now like to provide some forward-looking guidance for 2014 and how that fits into our strategy for 2014 and our long-term goals. Our guidance is based on the broad assessments of the macro variables associated with the overall spine market as well as our strategic focus for the coming year. Based on the foundation that we have diligently built and the momentum that we have generated over the last 18 months from solid, consistent execution we are excited about the opportunities that lie ahead in 2014 for Alphatec.

Our strategy for 2014 will be to grow revenue slightly ahead of the overall spine market through procedural revenue gains, especially leveraging our strong MIS and biologics offerings, new surgeon acquisition and attention and a broad suite of innovative products. As we do this we will continue to expand margins through improvements in ongoing mix, French restructuring initiative and continuing to drive the efficiency throughout our business.

In 2014, we expect full year revenues for 2014 to be in the range of $208 million to $215 million. This represents approximately 1.6% to 5% growth over 2013 on an as-reported basis. This represents 4.5% to 8% growth when adjusted for the prior year’s contribution from French commercial operations. We anticipate first half, second half revenues to be weighted towards the back half of the year attributable to continued growth of recently introduced new products as the year unfolds.

We should anticipate Q1 being the lowest quarter of the year and sequentially down from Q4 of 2013 as a result of the cessation of business activates in France and bad weather across much of the United States.

We anticipate non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $30 million to $33 million or approximately 19% to 31% over 2013 and representing approximately 14.4% to 15.3% of revenue. Adjusted EBITDA guidance assumes that there are no further ongoing trail-related litigation expenses associated with the OrthoTec versus Surgiview legal matter.

Our forward-looking guidance for 2014 is consistent with our stated longer term objectives of growing revenues at twice the rate of the market and a target adjusted EBITDA of approximately 20%. Our annual revenue is driven primarily by the continued expansion of our gross margins and leveraging of our operating expenses.

In summary, we are very pleased to report both record quarter and full year results for 2013. We’ve made great strides as an organization over the past couple of years and we look forward to executing on our business plans as we move into 2014 and beyond.

Now I’d like to turn the call back over to Les.

Leslie H. Cross

Thanks Mike. Good job. As I look back on my second year with Alphatec, I am extremely proud of the tremendous progress the team has made. With this strong foundation that we have built, our team now has an opportunity to provide greater focus externally on gaining market share and expanding our global business and continuing to establish long-term stakeholder value. I am excited about the opportunities that lie ahead for Alphatec. We have great confidence in the momentum as we enter 2014.

In closing, I’d like to reiterate that along with the Alphatec’s Spine Board of Directors and leadership team, we are committed to executing our plan and creating even greater value for our employees, customers, patients and shareholders around the world. Additionally, I would like to acknowledge and thank our employers and our distribution partners for their hard work and commitment has enabled the company to deliver the record results for this quarter and the full year.

Doing okay, thanks. Wondering if I could ask a little bit about the settlement. As we talked about before, as you described before there were still some questions in terms of where the ultimate liability my rest in that issue and whether they’ll be with you or perhaps pervious parties that might have some exposure. And I’m curious what led you to ultimately decide that you should settle for the entire amount or at least some amount with OrthoTec?

Ebun S. Garner

Hi, it’s Ebun. I think when we looked at it, it really came down to five basic factors we’re looking at. Number 1, there could have been a significant amount of interest attached to the verdict; two, get to Phase II you would incur at least a couple of million dollars of legal expenses to win Phase II. You also had exposure in New York. There were certain directors of Scient’x that were defendants in New York and there were indemnification obligations with respect to those directors. Even after you get through all of the trial stage matters you still have what would prove to be a lengthy appeal process, if we’re successful on all of this.

And then finally, just the added distraction of our resources and management through what was destined to be a multiyear process still to come.

Raj Denhoy – Jefferies & Company, Inc.

Okay. But that basic idea, I mean you sort of assumed all of the liabilities would eventually rest with you, I mean was it sort of decided along the way that whether it was Healthpoint or even the previous Scient’x organization whether there was any liability that might rest with those parties as opposed to passing all the way through?

Leslie H. Cross

Well, I mean we purchased all the stock of Scient’x and so any liabilities that would lie with Scient’x eventually would lie with Alphatec because we consolidate their financials into ours. So it’s not as if we’re a position where we could just leave Scient’x hanging with a large liability.

Raj Denhoy – Jefferies & Company, Inc.

And that goes similarly for Healthpoint?

Leslie H. Cross

No, it is not similar for Healthpoint.

Raj Denhoy – Jefferies & Company, Inc.

Okay. Well, I’ll leave it there. We can chat off-line about it. But then the other point of it was the way you structured the deal in terms Deerfield getting, I think, it was $6.25 million more, so at $1.39. How did you arrive at that, both the dilution you’re willing to take also the evaluation of that $1.39 in place?

Leslie H. Cross

Yes. So I think one of the things we did was we obviously looked at a number of institutions that were potentially in a position to be able to give us some support on quite a short amount of time. So we actually had some competitive bits, some competitive offers to be able to see what we could do here and Deerfield came through with a highly competitive offer and certainly have been great partners all the way through the process today. I think at the same time you have to acknowledge we have a senior lender MidCap Financial and obviously you have to consider their willingness and ability to entertain subordinated debt. And I think, overall, we have very good solution between both of our lenders and the company.

Raj Denhoy – Jefferies & Company, Inc.

Okay. That’s fair enough. And just lastly on the business, I wonder if I could ask about. The EBITDA performance in the quarter was certainly good, as you look at out into 2014 and beyond, it strikes me that you’re making significant progress there. And I am curious that you could give us a sense of what you’re thinking, you might end 2014 on a run rate basis on EBITDA, could you can be pushing $10 million as you get out of the year?

Michael O'Neill

Well, I think our guidance range for EBITDA would suggest that that’s a little aggressive, for the final quarter of the year. I think what we have been comfortable saying is that we continue to make a lot of progress on our gross margin expansion certainly the actions that we have taken in France would legitimatize that statement. And we expect our gross margins to improve as each quarter of the year unfolds. I don’t want to get into specific quarter guidance at this point in time. But I think it’s fair to say that Q4 is likely to be one of the more profitable quarters from an EBITDA basis that we would see in the year.

Raj Denhoy – Jefferies & Company, Inc.

Okay, fair enough. Thank you.

Michael O'Neill

Thanks, Ross.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question is from Matt Miksic from Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions.

Leslie H. Cross

Hey, Matt

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

Hey, so, maybe just a follow-up on those the warrants and through what’s just going to in terms of dilution. I didn’t maybe I missed it, but did you give just sort of round number as to what we should expect this year for weighted average shares outstanding couple of shares?

Michael O'Neill

So, upon execution of the agreement today you’ll see, so 6.25 million warrants at $1.39, So that’s effective with the signing of the agreement. To the extent that the Company is in a position to drawdown against the $50 million facility, we will issue pro rata up to a maximum of $10 million warrants. So, if we pull down for example, wallet payment is $17.5 million, if we pull down $17.5 million you’ll see a pro rata warrant adjustment for that. But you can think of the worst case scenario in terms of that number would be 16.25 million shares at the end of the year, if we would have drawdown the full amount of the facility.

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

Is that a case or rate that you expect to execute on this facility or this opportunity?

Michael O'Neill

I don’t want to get into the specifics of how much we’re going to drawdown as we go throughout the year. Obviously, the facilities in play for a reason, we want to be in a position to use it, but I am not prepared to comment at this point exactly what number by when.

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

Sure. And just to push a little bit on that Mike, I mean the nature of your business the cash you are generating, and it’s just fair to say over the term of this agreement that should be more like that you use it a little bit more heavily in the beginning?

Leslie H. Cross

No, I think clearly we have an initial, an initial payment that is due on the settlement. We also have access to some growth capital, working capital within the facility, and I think that’s clearly an opportunity for us to think about the utilization of the cash that we have as well as contributing to more cash in the event we needed. I think it’s fair to say that we’re going to use the facility in quite a substantial way at this point in time.

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

That’s helpful. A couple of follow-ups on the fundamentals, you mentioned Illico clearly driving some of your, in particular some of your international sales in Japan. I’d like to understand maybe what of your new products were sort of making at the significant contribution here and what we saw in Q4 and which products and maybe when throughout the year we suspect to think of them having an impact heading into this year, I’m thinking of Pegasus and Solus?

Thomas McLeer

Hi, this is Tom McLeer, so I’d say in the U.S. Illico has continued to drive things internationally the same sort of situation with the continued training we have, so getting longer constructs on the MIS, side Solus certainly has moved along nicely for those surgeons that believe in a ALIF approach. So, we continue to focus training there and then was some of the new biologics, we launched and the Pegasus cervical implant, I think those are all going to be contributing factors through out the year.

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

So, as I hear you talked about, we should kind of expect look over Illico, just to remain kind of the biggest driver just coming years, is that fair?

Leslie H. Cross

Yes, I think that in addition to some new products that we launched in second half of the year, but certainly Illico continues to be a strong driver as we train more and more surgeons.

Matt S. Miksic – Piper Jaffray & Co.

Okay, and then just last from me as you could as you can mention Mike, the weather somehow may have impacted your guidance in someway. Is obviously a lot of talked about that last week at AAOS, wondering in terms of pace of the year, should we be expecting kind of a little bit of more than a seasonal dip here in Q1?

Michael O'Neill

I think as we came into 2014, to the extend that there is a seasonal dip and out there they may not be consistent with the rest of the industry, I think we certainly were impacted with the cancellation of a number of procedures in the January, February timeframe. What I think we’re looking at right now is when do that come back.

Thank you. So just the $1.1 million you are going to pay quarterly, you start that in Q4 when did the Biomet payments roll off?

Leslie H. Cross

It rolls off in Q4 2014.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Okay, so you are swapping in one out for the other?

Leslie H. Cross

Yes, it’s not lost on me.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Okay, and then so kind of that increase to margin goes away, just one for the other, the 74.4% I think it was on the U.S. gross margin, how sustainable is that at current levels. Is there, can we can keep that at 74% or is that going to bounced around certain levels?

Leslie H. Cross

We definitively had a strong fourth quarter in the U.S. Our mix was good, in addition unlike prior periods and prior quarters, I think Mike and his team have done an absolutely tremendous job managing some of the inventories, the obsolescence and the excess and so we are not seeing any extraneous charges come through that vary the gross margin. So as Tom indicated out our strength in Illico and Solus helped, but overall we had a good quarter.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Tommy, the way I should think about this is maybe 70% or higher is how I should think about the U.S going forward, and then any improvements did you talk about gross margins improvements through the year would be coming via the changes going on for the international businesses.

Thomas McLeer

That’s true, that’s fair.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Okay, and then as we think about there is a lot cross winds in your revenue line, so we got I think annualization of the PureGen being pulled off to market somewhere half way between Q1. And then now you’ve got the French business coming off, like how much per quarter was the French business in 2013. How much are we going to have to pull out of our numbers for 2014? I just want to know how to think about that?

Leslie H. Cross

So you’ve got essentially $5.5 million coming out from France.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Full year?

Leslie H. Cross

For the full year.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

And then would you pull in that…

Leslie H. Cross

Just under $1.5million a quarter.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

And then is there any opportunity to replace that within stocking distributor over time?

Leslie H. Cross

We’re still in the process of restructuring our French operations, so that is not something that we are planning on in the near future.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Okay, in the PureGen headwind, it’s what about $1 million…

Leslie H. Cross

It’s about $1 million that came in Q1 of 2013.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Okay, so maybe, it’s about close to $1 million that is coming off, okay.

Leslie H. Cross

Yes.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

And then last question, just on guidance as you look at the guidance you are giving, how much of that include, is it getting into distributor in France, new products that are yet to be launched. Any change in the macro?

Leslie H. Cross

So I think in terms of macros, I think we are looking at U.S category growth of low single digits. We are continuing to forecast mid-single pricing declines in the U.S that is actually a consistent assumption across many of our international markets as well. I thought in terms of some of the prepared remarks, in terms of the back half versus the front half.

So, products that we launched in 2013, Solus, Illico, multi-level, Zodiac DVR, Pegasus they all contribute and build throughout the year. And obviously we have some launches tailored to the back half of 2014 that kind of drive that second half number, higher than the first half.

Thomas McLeer

Well I think, to answer your question there is nothing in the U.S budget that requires FDA approval.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Right.

Thomas McLeer

That we don’t have. The only approvals we are waiting for are Brazil and China

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

Yes.

Thomas McLeer

For rights to sell our products. There is nothing in the U.S numbers that could go south, because of the FDA.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

That Brazil and China are not in guidance.

Leslie H. Cross

Right. Brazil and China are not in the guidance.

Phil Skolnick – Canaccord Genuity, Inc.

.

And the last part of the guidance is just, I think on the POD business, you’ve less than 10%, less than 5%. I don’t know what the number is today. If I am thinking about the numbers that is the only potential headwind you could see if the two companies that used to play that our PODs, you end up not supplying anymore.

Oh, excellent. Can we start with easy questions? Mike, I think you said normal litigation expense in 2014 and how should we think about that kind of either through the quarters for the year relative to 2013?

Michael O'Neill

And relative to – so I think we highlighted the difference in litigation expenses of $4 million through the first nine months. And we backed out 3.7 of pre-trial cost in adjusted EBITDA for Q4. So we would be – I’m looking at G&A as getting back to normalized legal expenses, which is probably going to be in $3 million to $4 million rank, as opposed to what has been an exceptional period in 2013.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Okay. So can you kind of just give us a blunt number, Mike?

Michael O'Neill

I thought I gave you $3 million to $4 million.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Okay, sorry, my bad. And then just looking at the adjusted EBITDA for the full year, can you discuss what the estimate for depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation is?

Michael O'Neill

Hang on a second, Mark.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

I thought that was my easy question.

Michael O'Neill

Yes, right. I don’t know if I’ve got that on my fingertips right now.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

You can give it to me right now.

Michael O'Neill

I can follow-up offline, but there’s nothing. Depreciation comes down because we’re out of the French market. And our amortization doesn’t change. The amortization is scheduled the same. And then obviously we’ll take a route where the settlement expense goes. We took that expense now. So it will be cash going forward, not P&L.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Exactly, and they’re just stock-based comp.

Michael O'Neill

No significant changes versus what was reported in 2013. May go up a little bit.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Awesome. All right, Mike. Okay. I guess at the risk of drawing some ire here, I’m going to ask the question. If we go back to some of the judge and the jury and appeals rulings on the OrthoTec and the Scient'x litigations back in California, there is mention of fraudulent activity. So the way you’ve stated this, now how do you deal with that with respect to perhaps legal action going forward and D&O insurance et cetera, et cetera?

Ebun S. Garner

I think you’re confusing – this is Ebun. I think you’re confusing what we generally refer to as, you run-of-the-mill fraud with a fraudulent transfer, which is nothing more than what the verdict held was that assets were bought of a distressed company for less than their fair market value. That’s a far cry from the general allegations of fraud that it seems like you’re talking about. In California it’s actually called constructive frauds. So it’s actually a different course of action entirely than your run-of-the-mill fraud.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Okay. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not insinuating any fraud. I’m just reading transcripts, legal transcripts. And I guess the comment is that insurance companies are not in the charity business, and they are going to look for every opportunity to try and renege on what they have to pay up. So I guess my question is are you quite comfortable now that any issue that will come out, the share, the losses to anything going forward will be covered by the insurance that you have in place?

Ebun S. Garner

Right now there are no shareholder losses. We’ve been dealing with this litigation since 2009 into 2010. There haven’t been any shareholder losses related to this litigation and so to the extent that there is one will address it at that time.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Right. But it’s fair to say that the ruling have only tended down in the last couple of months, right? The lawsuits have been going on, but the awards are recent and it takes time for these things to get momentum.

Ebun S. Garner

Thus far we haven’t seen any activity that would lead us to think that a shareholder lawsuit is imminent or even being planned.

Leslie H. Cross

Already we can pick it up, when that happens, if it happens. I hope it doesn’t.

Mark Landy – Summer Street Research Partners

Thanks, guys.

Leslie H. Cross

Thanks Mark. Is there any additional questions?

Operator

There are no further questions. I would now like to turn the call back to Mr. Les Cross for any further remarks.

Leslie H. Cross

Great, thank you very much. Well, that obviously concludes our call and our question-and-answer section for today. So, I thank everybody for their time and attention and assure you about our commitment to continue to improve the performance of this company on a go-forward basis. So, thank you everybody.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This does conclude today’s program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.