The Film Photography PodcastLaunched in October of 2009, the Film Photography Podcast is a 90 minute, bi-weekly Internet radio program, exploring a wide range of topics relevant to the experienced and aspiring photographer using film as a medium. Hosts Michael Raso and Duane Polcou enthusiastically dissect and debate the pros-and-cons of film formats, do-it-yourself techniques, digital technologies, and vintage and contemporary cameras and accessories in a thorough, informative and casual manner. Regular features include Camera tests and reviews, “book of the month”, interviews, a listener-generated Q&A, and film-related giveaways.

I don't want to win the camera. I already own a Ciroflex, Rodinal, and all the other goodies. I'd just like to state that I've used Rodinal for a few years now and it's a great developer. I'm more of an Xtol fan, but Rodinal is one of the most economical developers out there (along with HC110.) Personally, I will turn to Rodinal more for enhanced grain, using it 1:25 than I do to stand develop (1:100) film. Tri-X in Rodinal at 1:25 looks very old skool. You get to really see the grain and appreciate it. Fomapan 400 looks great in Rodinal at 1:25. And even HP5+ looks good in Rodinal at 1:25 even though people recommend against it. My point is that most people using Rodinal seem to be on a quest to get the most shadow detail and 'perfect' results. I like it because I can use it to blow up grain. This is an 8x10 print done with a #5 contrast filter on MG paper of some Tri-X done in Rodinal:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/luketrash/2847058971/lightbox/

You can see the original scan of the film frame here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/luketrash/2813623313/lightbox/

I see a lot of the people online always trying to hit perfection in terms of tonal range, sharpness, and shadow detail. Sometimes I like to purposely throw it away in favor of accutance and grain that gives you the look of a truly analog process.