When a reporter from the Yunnan province Ruili valuablejade association was informed that after the negotiation broke the price of 300 thousand yuan (RMB, same below) of tourists and businesses collapsed after Ms. fee at 17 days to reach a compensation agreement, the final 170 thousand to the price of compensation fee, Ms. bear 70% of the responsibility, the responsibility to bear 30% businesses. (Beijing in July 19th) to try 300 thousand Bracelet accidentally broken, after the successful settlement fee lady bear 70% of the responsibility, fairness, may wish to see whether it can withstand the five question". First of all, whether the store has clearly marked prices? From the report, Ms. fee don’t know that I tried wearing the bracelet priced at 300 thousand yuan, if she knew, certainly not to try, or carefully try. However, the reality is that Ms. Fei is wearing a bag with her left hand and an umbrella with her right hand. Obviously, I do not know the fee lady real price bracelet. Visible, the store owner or did not do mark up, or after the price tag is not in "significant position", so that consumers Zhi Xiao. This is clearly inconsistent with the relevant provisions of the "consumer protection law", there is no guarantee of consumer’s right to know, the store to be responsible for it. Secondly, the existence of the "pengci store business"? Reported that when the incident, the clerk in a group of bracelets for packaging, bracelet placed on the counter, the woman walked through a bracelet to wear test". Note that such valuables are placed on the counter and placed improperly; and bracelets are fragile, but they have not taken any safety measures, which are improper storage. Based on "two improper", let Ms. fee can reach out and try to bracelet are broken, it is easy to let people feel the store is in inducing consumers to take the bait, if so, with no two social "pengci"; if there is, it is a typical "touch the porcelain business". Third, whether the store has failed to fulfill its obligation to inform? The law on the protection of consumers’ rights and interests clearly stipulates that the operators have the duty of informing and guarantee the fair consumption of consumers. Arguably, the fee of woman wearing the bracelet, the clerk should remind the jade bracelet is fragile, be careful to try, and try to provide the correct method, at the same time provide a safe place to wear, to ensure the safety of the jade bracelet. But in reality, the clerk did not do these, the store should be responsible for their failure to fulfill the obligation to bear part of the responsibility. Fourth, the store is "lion big openings"? The local Ruili gem association evaluation to assess the market value of Specialized Committee was 180 thousand yuan, if the third party assessment, the market price may be less than the jade bracelet. Especially the 180 thousand yuan bracelet was valued to shout out the price of 300 thousand yuan, the existence of "false price", "lion’s mouth"? Thus resulting in claims is also "astronomical claims"? After all, there have been reports that the Pingdingshan public Lee tried to wear a jade bracelet priced at 400 thousand, during which the bracelet slipped and smashed into 4 pieces, and the court decided Li to compensate the plaintiff for 16800 yuan. 400 thousand yuan bracelet, compensate 16800 yuan. Now, Ms. Fei to assume 70% responsibility, if in accordance with the 170 thousand yuan compensation, Ms. Fei’s compensation over 100 thousand yuan, this is not "astronomical claims"? This is also worth considering. ﻿记者从云南省瑞丽宝玉石协会获悉，经过协商摔断售价30万元(人名币，下同)后晕倒的游客费女士与商家于17日达成赔偿协议，最终以17万的价格进行赔偿，费女士承担70%责任，商家承担30%责任。（7月19日中新网）