The
first installment of this highly controversial documentary features renowned
scientist, Judy Mikovits Ph.D.

The
complete movie is scheduled to be released in summer 2020.

“Humanity
is imprisoned by a killer pandemic. People are being arrested for surfing in
the ocean and meditating in nature. Nations are collapsing. Hungry citizens are
rioting for food. The media has generated so much confusion and fear that
people are begging for salvation in a syringe. Billionaire patent owners are
pushing for globally mandated vaccines. Anyone who refuses to be injected with
experimental poisons will be prohibited from travel, education and work. No,
this is not a synopsis for a new horror movie. This is our current reality.

“Let’s back up to address how we got here...

“In the early 1900s, America’s first Billionaire, John D. Rockefeller bought a
German pharmaceutical company that would later assist Hitler to implement his
eugenics-based vision by manufacturing chemicals and poisons for war.
Rockefeller wanted to eliminate the competitors of Western medicine, so he
submitted a report to Congress declaring that there were too many doctors and
medical schools in America, and that all natural healing modalities were
unscientific quackery. Rockefeller called for the standardization of medical
education, whereby only his organization be allowed to
grant medical school licenses in the US. And so began the practice of immune
suppressive, synthetic and toxic drugs. Once people had become dependent on
this new system and the addictive drugs it provided, the system switched to a
paid program, creating lifelong customers for the Rockefellers. Currently,
medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US. Rockefeller’s
secret weapon to success was the strategy known as, “problem-reaction-solution.”
Create a problem, escalate fear, then offer a
pre-planned solution. Sound familiar?

“Flash forward to 2020...

“They named it COVID19. Our leaders of world health predicted millions
would die. The National Guard was deployed. Makeshift hospitals were erected to
care for a massive overflow of patients. Mass graves were dug. Terrifying news
reports had people everywhere seeking shelter to avoid contact. The plan was
unfolding with diabolical precision, but the masters of the Pandemic
underestimated one thing... the people. Medical professionals and every-day
citizens are sharing critical information online. The overlords of big tech
have ordered all dissenting voices to be silenced and banned, but they are too
late. The slumbering masses are awake and aware that something is not right.
Quarantine has provided the missing element: time. Suddenly, our overworked
citizenry has ample time to research and investigate for themselves. Once you
see, you can’t unsee.

“The window of opportunity is open like never before. For the first time in
human history, we have the world’s attention. Plandemic
will expose the scientific and political elite who run the scam that is our
global health system, while laying out a new plan; a plan that allows all of
humanity to reconnect with healing forces of nature. 2020 is the code for
perfect vision. It is also the year that will go down in history as the moment
we finally opened our eyes.”

And for a textbook case of character assassination, just Google Dr.
Judy Mikovits.

Subject : The
Triumph of Political Capitalism & The Challenge of Crisis Management.

V-E Day, 2020

Grenoble, France

Dear
Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,

Dirty tricks and deceptions are the currency of exchange
in capitalist democracy, the very foundation of which is economic inequality. The rule of thumb in such an enterprise is, as
it must always be, “if the majority cannot be manipulated, then they must be neutralized,
at all costs.” [This is a lesson not lost on the supports of Bernie Sanders’
most recent flop.]

The
history of William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925), a political opportunist useful
to the Democratic Party wing of the American ruling class, reveals a “political
leader” who spoke the rhetoric of the Populist Movement, but failed to
represent the interests of ordinary people. Though he talked the talk, he
failed to walk the walk, and instead collaborated with a faction of the
capitalist class. He represented himself and worked within the Democratic Party
apparatus, running three times as the Party's nominee for President of the
United States in the 1896, 1900, and 1908 elections.

After
the Democrats won the presidency in the 1912 election, Woodrow Wilson rewarded
Bryan's support with the important cabinet position of Secretary of State. Bryan
helped Wilson pass the Federal Reserve Act, which created the central bank’s control over
American society beginning in 1913. Later
he and Wilson clashed over the President’s retreat from his widely proclaimed campaign
promise“to keep
America out of the war”. In 1915, Bryan resigned from his post as Secretary of
State, after Wilson was successfully manipulated to send Germany a note of
protest in response to the sinking of Lusitania by a German U-boat, after a
deliberate U.S. provocation by attempting to deliver military contraband to
England. After leaving office, Bryan
retained some of his influence within the Democratic Party, but increasingly he
devoted himself to religious matters and anti-evolution activism. [For more on
the so-called “Progressive Movement,” see Gabriel Kolko’s
influential book, The
Triumph of Conservatism, A Reinterpretation of
American History, 1900-1916 (1963).]

Eustace
Mullins (1923-2010), in his ground-breaking book The
Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1954, 2018), recounts how the Federal
Reserve Bank was instrumental in causing 20th-century catastrophes,
including the First and Second World Wars and the Great Depression of 1929-1941.

In
Chapter 11, Mullins recounts Bryan’s discomfort with Woodrow Wilson’s blatant
deceptions before the First World War. Bryan intoned: “Money is the worst of
all contrabands”; while he nevertheless supported in 1913 the creation of the
U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, without which the First World War would have been
impracticable. (For more information on this subject see CEIMSA Bulletin N°894.]

Mullins’
original research was inspired by the famous American poet and literary
critique Ezra Pound. While targeted for extinction at the time of publication, it
has inspired many other authors to pursue this lead in exposing the role played
by central bankers in the “great enterprise” of modern warfare and economic
recessions/depressions. In 1954, Mullins wrote : “It is now apparent that there
might have been no World War without the Federal Reserve System.”

A
strange sequence of events, none of which were accidental, had occurred.
Without Theodore Roosevelt’s “Bull Moose” candidacy, the popular President Taft
would have been reelected, and Woodrow Wilson would have returned to obscurity.* If Wilson had not been elected, we might have had no
Federal Reserve Act, and World War One could have been avoided. The European
nations had been led to maintaining large standing armies as the policy of the
central banks which dictated their governmental decisions. In April, 1887, the
Quarterly Journal of Economics had pointed out:

‘A detailed revue of the public debts of Europe shows interest and
sinking fund payments of $5,343 million annually (five and one-third billion).
M. Neymarck’s conclusion is much like Mr. Atkinson’s.
The financers of Europe are so involved that the governments may ask whether
war, with all its terrible chances, is not preferable to the maintenance of
such a precarious and costly peace. If the military preparations of Europe do
not end in war, they may well end in the bankruptcy of the States. Or, if such
follies lead neither to war nor to ruin, then they assuredly point to industrial
and economic revolution.’

*[ In his book, The
Strangest Friendship in History, Woodrow Wilson and Col. House (1932),
George Sylvester Viereck wrote: “House revealed to me in a confidential
moment, ‘Wilson was elected by Teddy Roosevelt.’”]

From 1887 to 1914, this precarious system of heavily
armed but bankrupt European nations endured, while the United States continued
to be a debtor nation, borrowing money from abroad, but making few
international loans, because we did not have a central bank or ‘mobilization of
credit’. The system of national loans developed by the Rothschilds
served to finance European struggles during the nineteenth century, because
they were spread out over Rothschild branches in several countries. By 1900, it
was obvious that the European countries could not afford a major war. They had
large standing armies, universal military service, and modern weapons, but
their economies could not support the enormous expenditures. The Federal
Reserve System began operations in 1914, forcing the American people to lend the Allies twenty-five billion dollars which was
not repaid, although considerable interest was paid to New York bakers. The
American people were driven to make war on the German people, with whom we had
no conceivable political or economic quarrel. Moreover, the United States
comprise the largest nation in the world composed of Germans, almost half of
its citizens were of German descent, and by a narrow margin, German had been
voted down as the national language [by the Constitutional Convention of
1787].’

The
German Ambassador to Turkey, baron Wangeheim asked
the American Ambassador to Turkey, Henry Morgenthau, why the United States intended
to make war in Germany. ‘We Americans,’ replied Morgenthau, speaking for the
group of Harlem real estate operators of which he was the head, ‘are going to
war for a moral principle.’ J.P. Morgan received the proceeds of the first
Liberty Loan to pay off $400,000,000 which he advanced to Great Britain at the
outset of the war. To cover this loan, $68,000,000 in notes had been issued
under the provisions of the Aldrich-Vreeland Act for issuing notes against
securities, the only time this provision was employed. The notes were retired
as soon as the Federal Reserve Banks began operation, and replaced by Federal
Reserve Notes.

During
1915 and 1916, Wilson kept faith with the bankers who had purchased the White House
for him, by continuing to make loans to the Allies. His Secretary of State,
William Jennings Bryan, protested constantly, stating that ‘Money is the worst
of all contraband.’ By 1917, the Morgans and Kuhn, Loeb
Company had floated a billion and a half dollars in loans to the Allies. The
bankers also financed a host of ‘peace’ organizations which worked to get us
involved in the World War. The Commission for Relief in Belgium manufactured
atrocity stories against the Germans, while a Carnegie organization, The League
to Enforce Peace, agitated in Washington for our entry into war. This later
became the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which during the 1940s
was headed by Alger Hiss. One writer claimed that he had never seen any ‘peace
movement’ which did not end in war.

The
U.S. Ambassador to Britain, Walter Hines Page, complained that he could not
afford the position, and was given twenty-five thousand dollars a year spending
money by Cleveland H. Dodge, president of the National City Bank. H.L. Menken
openly accused Pate in 1916 of being a British agent, which was unfair. Page
was merely a bankers’ Agent.

On
March 5, 1917, Page sent a confidential letter to Wilson. ‘I think that the
pressure of this approaching crisis has gone beyond the ability of the Morgan
Financial Agency for the British and French Governments… The greatest help we
could give the Allies would be a credit. Unless we go to war with Germany, our
Government, of course, cannot make such a direct grant of credit.’

The
Rothschilds were wary of Germany’s ability to continue
in the war, despite the financial chaos caused by their agents, the Warburgs, who were financing the Kaiser, and Paul Warburg’s
brother, Max, who, as head of the German Secret Service, authorized Lenin’s
train to pass through the lines and execute the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
According to Under Secretary of the Navy, Franklin D. Roosevelt, America’s
heavy Industry had been preparing for war for a year. Both the Army and Navy Departments
had been purchasing war supplies in large amounts since early in 1916. Cordell
Hull remarks in his Memoirs [1948, v.1, page 76]:

‘The
conflict forced the further development of the income-tax principle. Aiming, as
it did, at the one great untaxed source of revenue, the income –tax law had
been enacted in the nick of time to meet the demands of the war. And the
conflict also assisted the putting into effect the Federal Reserve System,
likewise in the nick of time.’

On
may ask, in the nick of time for whom? Certainly not for the American people,
who had no need for ‘mobilization of credit’ for a European war, or to enact an
income tax to finance a war. Hull’s statement affords a rare glimpse into the
machinations of our ‘public servants.’

The
Notes of the Journal of Political Economy, October, 1917, state:

‘the
effect of the war upon the business of the Federal Reserve Banks ahs required
an immense development of the staffs of these banks, with a corresponding
increase in expenses. Without, of course, being able to anticipate so early and
extensive a demand of their services in this connection, the framers of the
Federal Reserve Act had provided that the Federal Reserve banks should act as
fiscal agents of the Government.’

The
banks had been waiting since 1887 for the United States to enact a central bankplan so that
they could finance a European war among the nations whom they had already
bankrupted with armaments and ‘defense’ programs. The most demanding function
of the central bankmechanism is war finance.

On
October 13, 1917, Woodrow Wilson made a major address, stating:

‘It
is manifestly imperative that there should be a complete mobilization of the
banking reserves of the United States. The burden and the privilege (of the
Allied loans) must be shared by every banking institution in the country. I
believe that cooperation on the part of the banks is a patriotic duty at this
time, and that membership in the Federal Reserve System is a distinct and
significant evidence of patriotism.’

E.W.Kemmerer writes that ‘As fiscal agents of the government, the federal
reserve banks rendered the nations services of incalculable value after our
entrance into war. They aided greatly in the conservation of our gold
resources, in the regulation of our foreign exchanges, and in the
centralization of our financial energies. One shudders when he thinks what
might have happened if the war had found us with our former decentralized and
antiquated banking system.’

Mr.
Kemmerer’s shudders ignore the fact that if we had kept ‘our antiquated banking
system’ we would not have been able to finance the World War or to enter as a
participant ourselves.

Woodrow
Wilson himself did not believe in the crusade to save the world for democracy.
He later wrote that ‘The World War was a matter of economic rivalry.’

On
being questioned by Senator McCumber about the
circumstances of our entry into the war, Wilson was asked, ‘Do you think if Germany
had committed no act of war or no act of
injustice against our citizens that we would have gotten into the war?’

‘I
do think so,’ Wilson replied.

‘You
think we would have gotten in anyway?’ pursued McCumber.
‘I do,’ said Wilson.

In
Wilson’s War Message in 1917, he included an incredible tribute to Communists
in Russia who were busily slaughtering the middle class in that unfortunate country.

‘Assurance
has been added to our hope for a future peace of the world by the wonderful and
heartening things that have been happening in the last few weeks in Russia.
Here is a fit partner for a League of Honor.’

Wilson’s
paean to the bloodthirsty regime which has since murdered sixty-six million of
its inhabitants in the most barbarous manner exposes his true sympathies and
his true backers, the bankers who had financed the blood purge in Russia. When the
Communist Revolution seemed in doubt, Wilson sent his personal emissary, Elihu Root, to Russia with one hundred million dollars from
his Special Emergency War Fund to save the toppling Bolshevik regime.

The
documentation of Kuhn, LobeCompany’s involvement in the establishment of Communism in Russia
is much too extensive to be quoted here, but we include
one brief mention, typical of the literature on this subject. In his book, Czarism
and the Revolution, Gen. Arsene de Goulevitch writes,

‘Mr.
Bakmetiev, the late Russian Imperial Ambassador to
the United States, tells us that the Bolsheviks, after victory, transferred 600
million rubles in gold between the years 1918 -1922 to Kuhn, Loeb Company.’

After
our entry into World War I, Woodrow Wilson turned the government of the United
States over to a triumvirate of his campaign backers, Paul Warburg, Bernard
Baruch and Eugene Meyer. Baruch was appointed head of the War Industries Board,
with life and death powers over every factory in the United States, Eugene
Meyer was appointed head of the War Finance Corporation, in charge of the loan
program which financed the war. Paul Warburg was in control of the nation’s
banking system. [Warburg was also the author of he
plan used to organize the War Finance Corporation.]

Knowing that the overwhelming
sentiment of the American people during 1915 and 1916 had been anti-British and
pro-German, our British allies viewed with some trepidation the prominence of
Paul Warburg and Kuhn, Loeb Company in the prosecution of the war. They were uneasy about his high
position in the Administration because his brother, Max Warburg, was at that
time serving as head of the German Secret Service. On December 12, 1918, the
United States Naval Secret Service Report on Mr. Wartburg was as follows:

‘WARBURG, PAUL: New York
City. German, naturalized citizen, 1911, was decorated by the Kaiser in 1912,
was vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. Handled large sums furnished by
Germany for Lenin and Trotsky. Has brother who is leader of the espionage
system of Germany.’

Strangely
enough, this report, which must have been compiled much earlier, while we were
at war with Germany, is not dated until December 12, 1918, AFTER the Armistice
had been signed. Also, it does not
contain the information that Paul Warburg resigned from the Federal Reserve
Board in May 1918, which indicates that it was compiled before May, 1918, when
Paul Warburg would theoretically have been open to a charge of treason because
of his brother’s control of Germany’s Secret Service.

Paul
Warburg’s brother Felix in New York was a director of the Prussian Life Insurance
Company of Berlin, and presumably would not have liked to see too many of his policyholders
killed in the war. On September 28, 1920, the New York Times mentioned
in its obituary of Jacob Schiff in reference to Kuhn, Loeb and
Company, ‘During the world War certain of its members were in constant contact
with the Government in an advisory capacity. It shared in the conferences which
were held regarding the organization and formation of the Federal Reserve System.’

The
1920 Schiff obituary revealed for the first time that Jacob Schiff, like the Warburgs, also had two brothers in Germany during World War
I, Philip and Ludwig Schiff, of Frankfurt-on-Main, who also were active as
bankers to the German Government! This was not a circumstance to be taken
lightly, as on neither side of the Atlantic were the said bankers obscure
individuals, who had no influence in the conduct of the war. On the contrary,
the Kuhn, Loeb partners held the highest governmental posts in the United
States during World War I, while in Germany, Max and Felix Wqrbrug and Philip
and Ludwig Schiff, moved in the highest councils of government. From Memoirs
of Max Warburg, “The Kaiser thumbed the table violently and shouted, ‘Must
you be always right?’ but then listened carefully to Max’s view on financial
matters.”

In
June, 1918, Paul Warburg wrote a private note to Woodrow Wilson. “I have two
brothers in Germany who are bankers. They naturally now serve their country to
their utmost ability, as I serve mine.”

Neither
Wilson nor Warburg viewed the situation as one of concern, and Paul Warburg
served out his term on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, while World Wr I
continued to rage.

The
background of Kuhn, Loeb & µCompany had been exposed in “Truth Magazine”,
edited by George Conroy . . . .

. . .

Sir
William Wiseman, chief of the British Secret Service, was a partner of Kuhn,
Loeb & Company. He worked most closely with Wilson’s alter ego Col. House.

‘Between
House and Wiseman there were soon to be few political secrets, and form their
mutual comprehension resulted in large measure our
close cooperation with the British.’ [Edward M. House, The
Intimate Papers of Col. House, edited by Charles Seymour, Vol. II, p. 399.]

One
example of House’s cooperation with Wiseman was a confidential agreement which
House negotiated pledging the United States to enter into World War I on the
side of the Allies. Ten months before the election which returned Wilson
to the White House in 1916 ‘because he kept us out of war’, Col. House
negotiated as a secret agreement with England and France on behalf of Wilson
which pledged the United States to intervene on behalf of the Allies. On March
9, 1916, Wilson formally sanctioned the undertaking.’[George Sylvester Viereck, The Strangest
Friendship in History, Woodrow Wilson and Col. House, p.106.]

Nothing
could more forcefully illustrate the duplicity of Woodrow Wilson’s nature than
his nationwide campaign on the slogan, ‘He kept us out of war’, when he had
pledged ten months earlier to involve us in the war on the side of England and
France. This explains why he was regarded with such contempt by those who
learned the facts of his career. H.L. Mencken wrote that Wilson was ‘the perfect
model of the Christian cad’, and that we ought ‘to dig up his bones and make
dice of them.’

According
to The New York Times, Pal Warburg’s letter of resignation stated that
some objection had been made because he had a brother in the Swiss Secret
Service. The New York Times has never corrected this blatant falsehood,
perhaps because Kuhn, Loeb Company owned a controlling interest in its stock.
Max Warburg was not Swiss, and although he had probably come into contact with
the Swiss Secret Service during his term of office as head of the German Secret
Service, no responsible editor at The New York Times could have been
unaware of the fact that Max Warburg was German, and that his family banking
house was in Hamburg, and that he held a number of high positions in the German
Government. He represented Germany at the Versailles Peace Conference, and
remained peacefully in Germany until 1939, during a period when persons of his
religion were being persecuted. To avoid injury during the approaching war,
when bombs would rain on Germany, Max Warburg was allowed to sail to New York,
his funds intact.(pp.89-95)

. . .

It
seemed strange that Woodrow Wilson felt it necessary to place the nation in the
hands of three men whose personal history was one of ruthless speculation and
the quest for personal gain, or that during war with Germany, he found as
persons of supreme trust a German immigrant naturalized in 1911, the son of an
immigrant from Poland, and the son of an immigrant from France. Bernard Baruch
first attracted attention on Wall Street in 1890 while working for A.A.
Houseman & Co.

. . .

Testifying
before the Nye Committee on September 1, 1937, Bernard Baruch stated that ‘All
wars are economic in their origin.’ So much for religious and political disagreements,
which had been specially touted as the cause of wars.

A
profile in the New Yorker magazine reported that Baruch made a profit of
seven hundred fifty thousand dollars in one day during World War I, after a
phony peace rumor was planted in Washington. In Who’s Who, Baruch
mentions that he was a member of the Commission which handled all purchasing
for the Allies during World War I. In fact, Baruch WAS the Commission. He spent
the American taxpayer’s money at the rate of ten billion dollars a year, and
was also the dominant member of the Munitions Price-Fixing Committee. He set
the prices at which the Government bought war materials. It would be naïve to presume
that the orders did not go to firms in which he and his associates had more
than a polite interest over American manufacturers. At the Nye Committee hearing
in 1935, Baruch testified, ‘President Wilson gave me a letter authorizing me to
take over any industry or plant. There was Judge Gray, President of United
States Steel, whom we were having trouble with, and when I showed him that
letter, he said, ‘I guess we will have to fix this up’, and he did fix it up.’

Some
members of Congress were curious about Baruch’s qualifications to exercise life
and death powers over American industry in time of war. He was not a
manufacturer, and had never been in a factory. When he was called before a
Congressional Committee, Bernard Baruch stated that his profession was
‘Speculator’. A Wall Street gambler had been made Czar of American Industry.

An
article which appeared in The New York Times dated September 23, 1914, listed
major stockholders of the five New York City banks which purchased 40% of the
203,053 shares of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York when the System was
organized in 1914. They thus obtained control of that Federal Reserve Bank and
have held it ever since. As of Tuesday, July 26, 1983, the top five surviving
New York City banks have increased their ownership of the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York to 53% of the shares.(pp.96-97)

The
21 + items below represent articles and essays which speak to the turmoil
that the historic collapse we are experiencing has produced in the economy and
in world views for many of us. While traditional authorities have been lacking
in their top-down “leadership” qualities,
horizontal discussions have developed
to share views and interpretations, independent, to an increasing degree, of any
established power elites.

This
democratic surge has been shown to respect diversity as the only possible path
for discovering true accounts of our collective situation. The received ideas
from the authorities no longer suffice, and any efforts at forced authoritarian
imposition of these ideas will no longer succeed. The stakes are too high.

Sincerely,

Francis
Feeley

---

Professeurhonoraire
de l'Université Grenoble-AlpesAncienDirecteur de
Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
(CEIMSA-in-Exile)The University of California-San Diego

Despite low unemployment rates and a rising stock
market, 3 out of 4 economists are expecting a recession by 2021. We are already
facing a crisis of poverty and economic precarity,
where 140 million people are poor or low-income, the costs of living are going
up and the chances of living are going down. What condition is our economy in
today, more than ten years after the Great Recession of 2008, to withstand
another economic downturn? What lessons have we learned – or failed to learn –
over this past decade? What lessons can we draw from history to guide us in the
months and years to come?

Join a conversation with economist Dr. Michael
Hudson on the 2008 economic crisis, what’s happened over the past ten years,
and what we can anticipate in 2020. Dr. Hudson in the President of the
Institute for the Study fo
Long-Term Economic Trends (ISLET) and Distinguished Research Professor of
Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. His has written
extensively on the 2008 crisis, including the books, The Bubble and Beyond,
Killing the Host, and J is for Junk Economics. He has
also done groundbreaking research on debt and finance in antiquity, most
recently in “….And Forgive Them their Debts,”
revealing the long history of lending, foreclosure and redemption, and how
“debts that can’t be paid, won’t be paid.” The only question is on whose backs
those debts will be carried.

From: Mark Crispin MillerSent: Friday, May 01, 2020 Subject: [MCM] "What you need to know about the COVID-19
vaccine," according to Bill Gates, who's not a doctor or a scientist, but
who's often played one on TV

This
is epidemiology for dummies, from the world's most powerful eugenicist.

MCM

THE VACCINE RACE, EXPLAINED

What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine

Humankind has never had a more urgent task than creating broad
immunity for coronavirus.

One of the questions I get asked the most these days is when the
world will be able to go back to the way things were in December before the coronavirus pandemic. My answer is always the same: when we
have an almost perfect drug to treat COVID-19, or when almost every person
on the planet has been vaccinated against coronavirus
[an "answer" that does not refer to herd immunity—MCM].

The former is unlikely to happen anytime soon. We’d need a miracle
treatment that was at least 95 percent effective to stop the outbreak. Most of
the drug
candidates right now are nowhere near that powerful. They could
save a lot of lives, but they aren’t enough to get us back to normal.
[Bullshit—MCM]

Which leaves us with a vaccine.

Humankind has never had a more urgent task than creating broad
immunity for coronavirus. Realistically, if we’re
going to return to normal, we need to develop a safe, effective vaccine. We
need to make billions of [dollars—oops, I mean doses, we need to [force
them on—oops, I mean] get them out to every part of the world, and [I—oops,
I mean] we need all of this happen as quickly as possible.

That sounds daunting, because it is. Our foundation is the biggest
funder of vaccines in the world, and this effort dwarfs anything we’ve ever
worked on before. It’s going to require a global cooperative effort like the
world has never seen. But I know it’ll get done. There’s simply no
alternative.

Here’s what you need to know about the race to create a COVID-19
vaccine.

+

The Coronavirus Is Man
Made According to Luc Montagnier the Man Who
Discovered HIV - Gilmore Health News

From: Mark Crispin MillerSent: Thursday, May 07, 2020 Subject: [MCM] Did this coronavirus
come from Ft. Detrick, in the fall of 2019? And, if
so, was it an accident, or a stroke of biowarfare?i

From
Pepe Escobar (post on Facebook):

LAST
SUMMER IN VIRGINIA UPDATE

You’ve
seen my previous post on “mysterious” cases in Virginia in early July
2019. That may carry a direct connection to Fort Detrick.

Very
important point: when a virus is taken out of storage at a hardcore BSL lab, it
is passed through an ANIMAL HOST to re-optimize its fitness. Our Top Working
Hypothesis has Sars-Cov-2 leaking out of Fort Detrick
probably in late June.

The
established fact is that “something” breached the USAMRIID’s steam
decontamination system. The identity of the leaked agent is of course
classified.

But
the fact remains that Fort Detrick did not fully
reopen for NINE MONTHS.

Dr.
Forster remains on top of this whole game. He sees the first infection - and
spread - of Sars-Cov-2 happening at some point between Sep 13 and Dec 7, by a
probability of 95%.

So
Patient Zero would be found in September. China ruled it out: could be no
earlier than November, those three from Inner Mongolia treated in Beijing.
Italy could probably have been October, according to Dr. Ramuzzi.

September
is the key.

Still
the real KEY, 20-something trillion question remains:

Sars-Cov-2
may have been accidentally released—and then the whole saga turned into a
massive geopolitical false flag.

It’s
hard because a part of me is scared of sticking out and wants to hide, hoping
that somebody smarter and braver than me will fix this world, while I watch.
It’s hard because I hate arguments, and I like to keep my private opinions to
myself while maintaining a pleasant, non-abrasive presence and fighting my
clean, safe, clearly defined public battles in a separate battle space. It’s
hard because I can't find meaningful enough words to say to anyone whose fear
is real, and I don’t believe that any argument or even undeniable facts have
ever convinced anyone who had not already been ready to investigate reality
head on.

But
I am even more scared of dying a coward. I was very sick, and I came out of it
more honest and much hungrier for life and joy.

My
mind keeps coming back to a disturbing thought: What if people in the early
Nazi Germany also closed their eyes and ears, while their brains were unable to
process the dark reality? What if the representatives of their educated class
kept saying, “Oh no, stop with the conspiracy, listen to experts, your rumors
are simply ridiculous!” until the darkness settled in and became the only
normal thing that was allowed to be, and then the senses succumbed to it? What
if this is happening again, on a larger scale?

What
if my voice was given to me so that I could speak? And what if I don’t speak, I will live and die in shame as I will be complicit
in what the future generations will know as a long era of heavy, joyless
darkness? What if I don’t need the permission to speak because the respectable
deranged who are trying to steal the natural world from us are not going to
give me the permission—drowning us in paid for “expert opinion” until there is
no more life in anyone’s eyes—and I need to give permission to myself? What if
I need to do it now?

For
years, as an artist and a curious person with an academic background, I have
been keeping my finger on the pulse, observing the trends, connecting the dots,
and forewarning my friends that based on my observations and logic, our
civilization was heading in a bleak and dangerous direction. My gut was telling
me that we were making a habit- and fatigue-based collective choice to mute our
innate instincts and outsource our thinking and decision-making to the
algorithm (literal or figurative) and its corrupt representatives—who are far
less competent, sane, or well-intended than what we give them credit for.

The
dire situation I was observing was exacerbated and simultaneously masked by
extreme fragmentation. Every small fragment of the slippery trajectory could be
explained and justified in clean and respectable terms—and it was—but if you
put all the small pieces together and looked at the big picture, the big
picture was undoubtedly of bleak, all-seeing, dignity-defying, nature-stomping
technological fascism.

We understand
that you are afraid, that you feel that you have no control over your
circumstances. this situation is scary and stressful.
When in pain we tend to feel like we are suffering alone, But
we want to tell you that you are not alone and that there’s always hope. Since we Palestinians are having a long and ongoing experience
with surviving suffering and misfortune, and as the world is dealing with
unprecedented circumstances and unexpected adversities caused by the Coronavirus pandemic.

We decided that
it's our moral duty to share tips and comfort with all of
whom are suffering today. I think in those times of uncertainty, fear
and depression the best message that someone can gives is a message of
empowerment and courage. We must be assured that we humans can make it and we
will! Only if we stand together in unity. Humanity can
change its fate, can eliminate unnecessary suffering, and can build a better
future for all, only if we just start to believe in ourselves more.

From: Mark Crispin MillerSent: Sunday, May 03, 2020Subject: [MCM] What's great (and also not so
good) about Michael Moore's "Planet of the Humans"

Despite its
flaws (which I'll get to in a moment), Michael Moore and Jeff Gibbs' Planet of the Humans is a
must-see documentary. This film does two things very well. First, it
demonstrates quite clearly that "green energy" is a delusion, as
wind and solar offer only intermittent power, and but a
fraction of the power required to run even a neighborhood, or a
large factory, much less a city; or an aircraft carrier, much less a navy;
and, at that, the manufacture, installation, maintenance and replacement of
those solar panels and towering windmills actually depend on generators powered
by fossil fuels.

("Green
energy" has been very good for the Koch brothers.)

That is an
important revelation; but what makes Planet
of the Humans an especially trenchant documentary—and the
reason why "the left" is freaking out about it, and why some
groups even want it banned—is
its vivid demonstration that the "green movement" is a catastrophic
scam, as the Sierra Club, and other major "green" nonprofits, and
such leading lights as Bill McKibben and Al
Gore, are owned by
billionaires and multinational corporations, including some of
the biggest polluters on the planet. Especially eye-opening
is the film's deft demolition of the
highly profitable myth that "biomass" is a renewable
resource—i.e., that gobbling up the forests of the world (and even rendering
animals) is preferable to using
coal and natural gas.

The biggest
problem with the film is its strong
implication—one shared by the "climate movement," and its elite
eugenicist supporters, like Bill Gates, and the Rockefellers—that what most
threatens the survival of the planet is humanity itself. Around the middle of the film, Gibbs has some
authoritative talking heads lament the scourge of global
"population"—as if the human population were not rapidly declining almost everywhere. And,
despite the documentary's righteous exposé of the predatory interests
backing the "green movement," Gibbs doesn't say a word about the
grotesque economic inequality that's slowly killing us today, and whose exalted
beneficiaries have vastly bigger carbon footprints than the rest of
us. To blame "humanity" itself instead of looking at the
staggering waste of resources by our overlords, and by the US military
juggernaut that serves their interests—and, even more important,
to say nothing of the catastrophic system
driving runaway consumption— is just to blame the rest of us
for our impending doom, which leaves us with no sense of what to do about all
this.

Listen to this talk by Bobby--about 1 hour and 20 minutes in.. It is the most intense and moving talk I've heard in
years. It's about 20 minutes when

Charlene and Ty asked Bobby and the other 5 or 6 participants in
the panel for closing words. I copied here just a few words the last few words but

his whole 20 minute talk about the dystopia Gates and our masters
want to create is worth listening to--and the panel.

Robert Kennedy Jr knows what evil Gates
is doing, what the pharmaceutical industry is doing and he says he recently saw
police giving kids tickets f

or swimming in the ocean. And he says that, soon, we won't even see
that. We'll be controlled by the cashless economy and by the microchip
that

monitors us and will give us the payment we need
to live in cryptocons

"Every part of our lives will be subject to
control. This virus is about training us for submission, training us to do what we're told. To not go to the beach unless
we're told, to not kiss our girlfriend without their permission
. They re turning us into production units and
consuming entities...They are going to rob us not only of our democracy our
liberties, but our souls. They are going to inject us with the medicines they
want and they're going to charge us for the diseases they give us. They are
going to control every part of our lives. What we are doing At Children Health
Defense is using the last instruments of democracy we have left--the Courts
---to fight

"We are in the last battle. We are in the apocalypse. We are
fighting for the salvation of humanity. We all knew this was
coming... but I never believed it would come in my lifetime. But here it
is..We are the happy few. We know what our job is in
this fight. And I'm so happy you guys are with me in the foxholes."

Note:
Today
is the 50th anniversary of the killing of four students at Kent State
University by the Ohio National Guard. A commemoration that would otherwise
have been held on the Kent State campus has been changed to a virtual
observance that should be available for at least the next week at www.kent.edu/may4kentstate50. Thanks to Tom Grace, author of
a book on the Kent State killings and their background, for this information.

The
"nostalgia" in the title refers, not to the "unnecessary and
catastrophic" war in Iraq but with Bush's actions in support of
international public health, which the article details. The author teaches
history and leadership at the University of Puget Sound has written the book Colin Powell:
Imperfect Patriot (2019).

This
somewhat lengthy article draws lessons from the long (and continuing) history
of cholera, which still kills an estimated 100,000 people a year in poor countries.The author is a primary care physician and a
senior teaching fellow at Brighton and Sussex Medical School.

With
the Justice Department's "narco-terrorism"
charges against Venezuela government officials in the background, this article
sketches a long history of US agencies' collusion with drug trafficking by
forces allied with the American empire. The author teaches Latin American
history at Arizona State University.

Why
has the presidential campaign turned into a debate over which candidate is more
virulently opposed to Beijing?" The author is a senior fellow at the
Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University.

This
is a detailed, chronologically organized comparison of how China and the US,
respectively, responded to the coronavirus. China
comes off looking infinitely better. The author has written 34 books including After Empire:
The Birth of a Multipolar World (2009).

From: Mark Crispin MillerSent: Monday, May 04, 2020 Subject: [MCM] Dr. Fauci's study of remdesevir appears to be a sham, meant (a) to black out the
success rate of hydroxychloroquine, and (b) to
reaffirm the need for that VACCINE.

Del Bigtree knocks the
ball out of the park. (He's rushed at first, but it's worth bearing with him.)

From: Mark Crispin MillerSent: Monday, May 04, 2020 Subject: [MCM] Great new interview with Drs. Erickson and Massihi, on the lockdown's "collateral damage,"
the propaganda drive against them, and much else

When Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. AntinMassihi held a press
conference on April 22nd about the results of testing they conducted at their urgent care
facilities around Bakersfield, California, the video, uploaded by a local ABC
news affiliate, went viral.

After reaching five million views,
YouTube took it down on the grounds that it "violated community
standards." We followed up with the
doctors to determine what was so dangerous about their message. What we
discovered were reasonable and well-meaning professionals whose voices should
be heard.

+

New motto for the Big Apple: "You wear a mask,
and stay six feet apart, or we'll beat the sh*t out of you."

New
York is now like Berlin c. 1932, with the NYPD functioning as brownshirts for “Il Fauci”
and Bill Gates.

Officers
from the New York Police Department have
decried city officials "get cops out of the social distancing enforcement
business altogether," following backlash stemming from a violent
confrontation with police over the weekend as officers tried to enforce the
rules.

Patrick
Lynch, the president of the Police Benevolent Association, lambasted city
leadership, saying officers have received "nothing but vague guidelines
and mixed messages, leaving the cops on the street corners to fend for
ourselves."

Officials
said over 112 summonses were issued in the city over the weekend for failing to
obey social distancing orders and at least three people were arrested.

The
arrests occurred in Manhattan’s East Village, where a plainclothes officer
handcuffed two people, Shakiem Brunson, 31, and
Ashley Serrano, 22, at a deli.

When
officers approached a third person, 33-year-old Donni
Wright, a confrontation occurred and the officer was caught on
camera slapping Wright in the face, punching him in the shoulder and
dragging him to a sidewalk after leveling him in a crosswalk.

The
exchange was caught on video by a bystander and went viral on social media.

On the other side, I encounter endless Internet rage
that Covid-19 is a hoax, that New York city’s hospitals are empty and no
one has died. It is nothing but a Rothchild-Rockefeller-Bill
Gates plot. Perhaps the most stunningly inconsistant
claim of all is that it is a bioweapon that is so
harmless that there should have been no lockdown. Why make a harmless bioweapon?

Where one stands on the closedown depends on where
one stands on other issues. If you are a libertarian, you oppose the
closedown because it interferes with your freedom and keeps useless old people
alive who cost you payroll tax dollars. If you are a Trump-hater like the
New York Times you blame Trump for understating the threat and not closing down
soon enough. If you are a Trump supporter you blame China and expect
China to pay for it by forfeiting their trillion dollar
holding of US government bonds.

Those decrying the closedown are unaware of the
mischief they are making. They have set it up for the elites, who have
taken us for another “bailout the one percent ride,” to blame the resulting
economic depression on the closedown. The US economy has been in a
long-term recession. Growth in income and wealth has accrued to the top
few percent who own the majority of stocks and bonds driven up in price by the
Fed’s money printing. The rest of the population has been hurt by the offshoring of their jobs and by the financialization
of the economy that leaves them little or no discretionary income after they
pay their rent or mortgage, car payment, credit card payment and student debt.

I first heard of Viral Interference only two days ago, and have
had little time to think about it. However, in this article, primarily about
Sweden and Norway (here) I used figures from Bob Klein. He was pointing out
that several mere Counties in the US had higher death rates than
many whole countries.

His figures are easily verified on worldometer.info. He rightly concludes that
this needs an explanation. His own suggestion was what he calls “over-vaccination”
in Western countries. Still thinking about the Norway-Sweden comparison, I
tried to find figures on flu vaccination of the elderly by country, since the
flu vaccine is the prime candidate for interference with Coronavirus.

The best data I could find was a graph in a European Centre for
Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) document here.The most recent data are for 2018.

I first compared Norway and Sweden. The former had about 35%
vaccination, while Sweden had 50%. I figured this MIGHT go some way to explain
the Swedish-Norwegian difference.

I then compared death rates for the countries with a high
vaccination rate – Italy and higher – and those with a low rate – Slovakia and
lower, that are shown on the graph. The average death rate for the high
vaccination countries was 353 per million, while for the low vaccination ones
it was only 24. (All data taken from worldometer.info.Details
below.) This is an astonishing variation in death rates in two sets of
countries chosen only by their propensity to vaccinate old people for flu. I’m
no statistician, but there is surely something here for statisticians to look
at.

I updated the article already referred to, then
did some more googling. I picked up a very
hard-to-find article from The BMJ (here.)
It refers to “a randomized placebo-controlled trial in Hong Kong children
found that flu shots increased the risk of noninfluenza
viral ARIs fivefold.” An ARI is an Acute Respiratory Infection. Covid19 is
a noninfluenza virus. The BMJ is not a conspiracy site, it’s the British Medical Journal, founded in 1840.

We may be looking at the key reason why New York and other
Western areas have such high mortality. A fivefold increased risk in
children! Children are barely affected by Covid,
but the old and frail are. Could their risk be increased tenfold? Or even a hundredfold? And could they be the main reservoir
of infection for the rest of the population? These are questions we need
answers to. And we need them now.

==========

s.

“Capital in the
21st Century”: Finally, a Movie That Tells the Story of How We Got Into This
Mess

Perspectives on the Pandemic - Episode 6: When Dr.
Dan Erickson and Dr. ArtinMassihi
held a press conference on April 22nd about the results of testing they
conducted at their urgent care facilities around Bakersfield, California, the
video, uploaded by a local ABC news affiliate, went viral. After reaching five
million views, YouTube took it down on the grounds that it "violated
community standards." We followed up with the doctors to determine what
was so dangerous about their message. What we discovered were reasonable and
well-meaning professionals whose voices should be heard.

From Richard Tamm:
‎
Here are links to video interviews with Dr. Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. "Dr. Judy A. Mikovits earned her BA in chemistry with a specialization in biology from the University of Virginia in 1980 and her PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology from George Washington University in 1992. In her 35-year quest to understand and treat chronic diseases, she has co-authored seminal papers culminating at least a decade of research in each of four fields: immunology, natural products chemistry, epigenetics, and HIV/AIDs drug development. In 2006, she became attracted to the plight of families with neuroimmune diseases including ME/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and autism. Dr. Mikovits has been primarily responsible for demonstrating the relationship between environmentally acquired immune dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and these diseases. Dr. Mikovits has published more than 50 peer-reviewed articles, many in the world’s top medical journals"

Dr. Mikovits combines both great scientific expertise which she expresses in the first two interviews to give us her understanding of what's really going on with Covid-19, while
also giving us damning details of the unethical/illegal actions that Dr. Fauci took against her and her boss, Frank Ruscetti, simply to advance his own career, and at the cost of countless lives.

I hope you can take the time to listen to these interviews and read the related articles/reports.

The first also has a long article with it and is the most detailed in virology and Covid-19. The second is even longer. Both of them discuss both Covid-19 and also the very unethical/fraudulent actions of Dr. Fauci. The third and fourth videos are much shorter and focus entirely on Dr. Fauci.

1. This was an interview with Dr. Mikovits by Dr. Mercola. Since Dr. Mikovits is a brilliant researcher who has been immersed in the science for decades, she talks fast about a lot of technical issues related to viruses, the history of discoveries, etc. So, Dr. Mercola has also provided snippets of his interview in various places to try to make it all more understandable for all of us. I have copied the article in its entirety into this email, but you must go to the link for it to view the videos of the interview, both the snippets of it interspersed throughout the article and also the entire interview at the bottom of the article. Also, at the bottom of this article, just under the video of the entire interview, is a link for the transcript of the entire interview which you can download. Or, I copied the link here, and possibly this will work to just click on this: Download Interview Transcript

Could Retroviruses Play a Role in COVID-19?

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Cellular and molecular biologist Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. believes COVID-19 — the disease — is not caused by SARS-CoV-2 alone, but rather that it’s the result of a combination of SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs (human gammaretroviruses)

SARS-CoV-2 also appears to have been manipulated to include components of HIV that destroys immune function along with XMRVs

Those already infected with XMRVs may end up getting serious COVID-19 infection and/or die from the disease. Mikovits’s research suggests more than 30 million Americans carry XMRVs and other gammaretroviruses in their bodies from contaminated vaccines and blood supply

Mikovits believes 40 years of data suggest Type 1 interferon at very low dose would be an ideal treatment for COVID-19

RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) testing, currently used to diagnose active infection by detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material, overestimates infection rates. For an accurate account of COVID-19 prevalence, we need to test for antibodies

Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. is a cellular and molecular biologist,1 researcher and was the founding research director of the Whittemore Peterson Institute that researches and treats chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in Reno, Nevada.
She is likely one of the most qualified scientists in the world to comment on this disease because of her groundbreaking research in molecular biology and virology. Mikovits is absolutely brilliant, but like many gifted researchers, her complex discussions on science quite challenging for the average lay person to follow.
For this reason, I present her interview in a different format, cutting and splicing pieces together to present a more cohesive and coherent presentation of her many important points. I would encourage you to watch the initial, very short, videos first, so you will be well-grounded, and if you are motivated, watch the entire interview at the bottom of this article.
Because there were so many surprising and important revelations in this interview I will present part 2 next week along with an interview with Bobby Kennedy, Jr which will revolve more on the vaccine issue.

Mikovits Doesn’t Believe SARS-CoV-2 Is the Cause of COVID-19

[snippet of interview]
One of the most shocking revelations Mikovits reveals is that she doesn’t believe SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of COVID-19 but merely serves to activate or wake up a dormant XMRV infection. To support her assertion, she states that COVID-19 patients have the same cytokine signature as the gammaretrovirus XMRV, which she published many years ago.
XMRV stands for “xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus.” Xenotrophic refers to viruses that only replicate in cells other than those of the host species. So, XMRVs are viruses that infect human cells yet are not human viruses.2
The XMRV retrovirus is actually the virus that has the same cytokine storm signature as COVID-19, not coronaviruses, which are far more benign. (I delve into what retroviruses are in another section further below.)
Additionally, there may be other infections that also are contributing to the infection, such as Borelia and Babesia or parasites, which may be why some of the antiparasite drugs like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are working.

Vaccine Gammaretroviruses Have Adapted and Are Aerosolized

[snippet of interview]
Getting back to the issue of gammaretroviruses, Mikovits research showed that many of our vaccines are contaminated with them. How did this happen? In short, vaccine viruses were replicated and grown in animal cell cultures that were already contaminated with retroviruses. In other words, the root of the problem stems from the use of contaminated cell culture lines.
Vaccine manufacturing frequently involves the use of animal tissues and many vaccines are grown animal culture cell lines. As noted in the 2010 paper, “Of Mice and Men: On the Origin of XMRV,” published in Frontiers in Microbiology (which Mikovits did not work on):3 “The novel human retrovirus xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) is arguably the most controversial virus of this moment. After its original discovery in prostate cancer tissue from North American patients, it was subsequently detected in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome from the same continent …The detection of integrated XMRV proviruses in prostate cancer tissue proves it to be a genuine virus that replicates in human cells, leaving the question: how did XMRV enter the human population? We will discuss two possible routes: either via direct virus transmission from mouse to human … or via the use of mouse-related products by humans, including vaccines. We hypothesize that mouse cells or human cell lines used for vaccine production could have been contaminated with a replicating variant of the XMRV precursors encoded by the mouse genome.”
Mikovits goes even further, explaining that, “It became clear in 2011 that these [gammaretro]viruses had adapted to become aerosolized.” This is a rather shocking finding, and this, Mikovits says, is what allows the gammaretroviruses to spread in laboratories from one cell line to another.
This could be related to research catalyzed by Charles Lieber, the former head of Harvard’s chemistry department, who is a nanoscience experts and was arrested by federal authorities earlier this year for working with the Wuhan Virology Institute.
Lab workers may also be inadvertently spreading them as they are using cell lines contaminated with retroviruses in vaccine production that could result in the spread of these retroviruses via the finished vaccine. Mikovits suspects COVID-19 may in fact be a type of vaccine-derived or vaccine-induced retroviral infection.
“I don't believe [COVID-19] is infection from without,” she says. “I believe the spread across [210] countries4 is from injection, and there's enough evidence to support that.”

SARS-CoV-2 — A Combination of SARS, Gammaretroviruses and HIV

Another of her theories is that SARS-CoV-2 is unlikely to have had a zoonotic origin but is likely synthetically produced. She believes it originated in and escaped or leaked from a biosafety laboratory. Mikovits believes both scenarios might be at play, where a lab-created virus, SARS-CoV-2, is causing serious infection and/or death only in those who have underlying retroviruses in their bodies.
Mikovits suspects that people who do not have retroviral infections, SARS-CoV-2 causes no or only mild symptoms. Another possibility is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the result of growing coronaviruses in retrovirus-contaminated cell lines, producing a gammaretrovirus-carrying virus.
According to Mikovits, her 2009 through 2011 work suggested 25 million to 30 million Americans were carriers of XMRVs and other gammaretroviruses. That estimate is over a decade old now so the number is likely far higher.“There is a family of gammaretroviruses, most likely [in] contaminated blood supply and vaccines that are still to this day, almost 10 years later, being injected,” she says.“We don't need an infectious virus if you inject the blueprint, if you inject the provirus. And … there are a lot of data to support COVID-19 is not SARS-CoV-2 alone, that it's SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs (human gammaretroviruses) and HIV.”

Might Wearing a Mask Worsen Your Odds of Illness?

[snippet of interview]
Mikovits is also highly critical of the recommendation (and in some places mandate) to wear a face mask or fabric cover such as a bandana around your face. She believes:“Wearing a mask is going to cause more secretions and give more cells a home and amplify any viruses. [Wearing a mask is] immune suppressive; it's going to limit your body’s ability to produce Type 1 interferon. You're driving the infection in yourself and you're not preventing the spread. [Instead], you're amplifying [replication of] not just [SARS-CoV-2] but also many other [viruses], including your XMRVs, influenza or other dormant viruses. What keeps those dormant viruses dormant? Your natural killer (NK) cells, your mast cells, your macrophages. That's where you're getting the inflammatory signature. So, every virus you amplify is driving the inflammatory signature, and you're going to get sick. [The resulting illness] doesn't have to be SARS-CoV-2 at all. You’re making yourself sick [by bringing dormant viruses out of dormancy]. It's insanity.”
Wearing a face mask after getting a live flu vaccine may further worsen your odds, she says. Why? Because you’re injecting three or more live flu virus strains into your body, which lowers your immune function. You’re also going to shed the viruses contained in the vaccine. If you wear a mask, Mikovits says, you’ll shed those viruses into the mask, which could encourage illness.
On the other hand, not wearing one might jeopardize the health of others. “If you're shedding [the viruses] into the air, you're going to make somebody else get another upper respiratory infection that's going to allow [SARS-CoV-2] to make them sicker,” she warns.

Why PCR Testing Is a Bad Idea

[ snippet of interview ]
We’re also being lied to about the prevalence of infection. We’re seeing inflated case numbers for the simple reason that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention no longer requires doctors to do testing in order to confirm that a patient is in fact infected with SARS-CoV-2 or died from COVID-19. The numbers now include “suspected” and “assumed” cases.
Naturally, without widespread and accurate testing, there’s no way to get a clear idea of how prevalent the infection is, and how many actually get sick and die from it. The initial emphasis on PCR testing resulted in massive false positives and greatly inflated numbers of those infected.
As noted by Mikovits, confirming each case through testing matters greatly, as there are hundreds, if not thousands, of microbes that can cause upper respiratory infections, including seasonal influenza viruses. None of those should be lumped in with COVID-19 if we want to understand the true nature and danger of this disease.
What’s more, the initial decision to use RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) testing instead of antibody testing was an unwise one, as it virtually guaranteed an overestimation of the problem. RT-PCR is now being used to diagnose an active infection by detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material.5 However, by doing that, you end up with high rates of false positives. Mikovits explains how the RT-PCR test works:“We're taking a swab and scraping some epithelial cells [from the back of the sinuses or throat] because that's what coronaviruses infect … We get a little RNA — because it's an RNA virus — we reverse-transcribe that, meaning write it backwards with enzymes in the lab, and then we amplify it [through a] polymerase chain reaction … We're only taking a piece of the virus, we're not taking the whole virus … The first thing about [the PCR] test is, it was admitted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the CDC that the tests put out by the CDC were contaminated. And when you amplify something a million times, or 10 million times — whatever they do in the 30 cycles or so — it's logarithmic that RNA then is way overestimated … [But] no [viral] particle was identified or isolated from your saliva or from your nasal passages. Nobody took the secretions from your nose or your mouth and isolated the [actual] viruses. [When I isolated] HIV in 1983, I isolated it from saliva. What you do is you take the virus and grow it in any human cell, in an appropriate cell line, and you make many copies. [Viral replication] means you have [a positive test for] that virus. Then you sequence the whole virus. A PCR [test, on the other hand] can give you a lot of false positives [by amplifying RNA fragments]. We [also] showed the people that had [HIV] infection had antibodies; that they had been fully exposed and it was not a piece of nucleic acid in a biopsy or in their throat or in their nose. [A piece of nucleic acid] is not a virus. And it's certainly not infectious. If RNA is there and in the tiniest amount, I'm not going to cough it on somebody, especially if I'm not coughing. I'm not going to breathe that [out and infect] somebody because there's no evidence of an infectious virus.”

Better Testing Strategy: Antibodies

Rather than using PCR testing, “what should have been done is test for antibodies,” Mikovits says. This is what was done in South Korea. An antibody test will tell you whether you had the infection at some point, and have developed a strong immune response or immunological memory that will allow you to fight the infection should you encounter it again.“Epidemiology is not done with PCR. In fact, Kary Mullis who invented PCR, Nobel Laureate, and others, said PCR was never intended for diagnostic testing. So that puts that to bed. It takes nothing to develop a really good serology [i.e., antibody] test … [It takes] a few weeks. It's pretty easy because the people who have recovered have antibodies. So, you isolate those antibodies, you take their plasma, you purify the antibodies, and then you can grow them. Then you develop the tests... It's usually ELISA or Western Blot [which check for] the protein and the antibody binds. You form an immune complex, and you detect it with a dye. You can do that test with a finger stick … and it takes 15 minutes to get the answer, almost like a pregnancy test.”
My belief is that the use of PCR instead of a proper antibody test was intentional, as it inflates the case numbers. Mikovits agrees, saying “I wouldn't get any tests right now. I'd simply wash my hands and drink hot lemon water as I always do for any flu season.”

Evidence SARS-CoV-2 May Be a Lab-Created Virus

[ snippet of interview ]
In the Epoch Times documentary, “Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus,” Mikovits details some of the evidence supporting the view that SARS-CoV-2 is not a naturally-evolved virus, but rather a laboratory concoction.
One piece of evidence is that the virus contains a protein envelope from the HIV virus. It’s also very similar to SARS which, according to bioweapons expert Francis Boyle, is an engineered bioweapon.
As explained by Mikovits, an Indian paper6,7 detailed the presence of Gp120, a protein envelope from the HIV virus. That paper was quickly retracted due to political pressure. However, Mikovits colleague, Luc Montagnier, made a similar discovery, finding Gp41 in the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the transmembrane domain of the HIV virus.“The folks from India also had GAG. That's structural proteins. That gives you a clue that it wasn't a CRISPR technique or a pseudotyping where the envelope was expressed in a gene therapy-type of way. Ifit were CRISPR, you wouldn't put the GAG sequences in there. What was done is, the virus was acquired as they grew SARS-CoV-2 in Vero-E6 cells — the monkey kidney cells where you get HIV. Simian immune deficiency virus was the origin, and we were told all the way back in the 80s that somebody forgot to cook their food in Africa and a few promiscuous men spread this [HIV] virus around the world. So, you can see again the patterns of the lies and of what people end up believing.”
The addition of this envelope protein from HIV gives SARS-CoV-2 the ability to impair the immune system. It also contributes to its pathogenicity. Mikovits continues her explanation:“The first thing is, you must grow a virus to make a lot of it. So, you grow it in cell lines. They didn't take [SARS-CoV-2] from the bat and it jumped into a human. It normally goes through another cell [from] a monkey or a smaller animal. The cell line that supports the growth and expansion [of viruses] are monkey kidney cells. Maybe [SARS-CoV-2] is not engineered at all … but the end result is, now it not only infects the epithelial cells of the lungs, it infects the white blood cells, it infects the immune cells. We see the splenomegaly in large spleens, we're seeing penias, cytopenias. We're losing cells like HIV-killing T-cells … So, it's got not only an expanded host range, but also disease symptoms that make no sense for a coronavirus. Hence, we're killing people because they're treating an upper respiratory infection, and you're getting that inflammatory disease signature because you're infecting the very innate immune response, the macrophages, the monocytes, the natural killer cells, the T cells. And it's primarily the T-cells in the macrophages because those are the cells HIV 120 and Gp41 infect through CCR5 in the CD4 receptor. So now you're going to lose your adaptive immune response, you're going to drive the inflammation. And it’s the fire [of inflammation] that does the tissue damage.”
Another piece that hints at SARS-CoV-2 being a manufactured virus is the construction of its spike proteins, which bind to ACE2 receptors to gain access into the cell. This appears to be an engineering feature. According to Mikovits, it’s quite clear that the spike proteins came from the original SARS virus, which also infects through ACE receptors.
There are also “single point mutations there that make it far more infectious, easier to spread,” she says, “and how those were acquired, nobody really can say.” At least not yet. Nanotechnology may also have been used to aerosolize it for ease of transmission. “The nano[size] further increases the host range. So now you can go into every cell. Now you can go across the blood brain barrier. That's nano. Now you don't need a receptor. You can breathe it, it can go into every cell of the body. You don't need the gatekeeper. You don't need the receptor. You don't need the lock and key.”

Contaminated Cell Line Shared With Wuhan Biolab

According to Mikovits, one contaminated cell line is the Vero monkey kidney cell line called Vero E6, which was given by Fort Detrick — a U.S. Army Medical Command installation that hosts many of our national biological defense programs and houses the National Cancer Institute laboratory where she used to work — to the biosafety 4 laboratory (BSL-4) in Wuhan, China. This cell line is what the Wuhan lab used to grow and study coronaviruses, she says.
The Vero cell line is listed in the 2015 paper,8 “A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential for Human Emergence,” co-written by University of North Carolina researchers and Dr. Shi Zhengli, a Chinese virologist at the Wuhan lab who in 2010 published a paper9 discussing the weaponization of the SARS virus.
The contaminated Vero monkey kidney cells were also used in the production of polio vaccines, Mikovits notes. The original polio vaccines were passed through mice brains, as we didn't have cell lines in the 1930s when that vaccine was originally developed. According to Mikovitz, the spread of this Vero retrovirus has occurred through laboratory workers and hospital caretakers for decades.
“That's why the family studies we did were so important,” she says, referring to studies in which retroviral transmission was tracked to determine how it spread between family members.10
Alas, whenever patterns were detected, she was always directed to cover them up. Her refusal to hide the information from the public was what led to her firing in 2011. According to Mikovits, we’re seeing the same pattern of sweeping evidence under the rug now during the COVID-19 pandemic. “The patterns are the same as far as the science goes, and the patterns are the same as far as the political corruption, the plague of corruption, in covering up data,” she says.

Mikovits Pioneering Research in XMRV

In 2009, Mikovits got embroiled in controversy when she wrote a paper reporting that a retrovirus known as xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus may play a causal role in CFS and other diseases, including autism. I interviewed her about this intriguing and complex story in December 2018 (see linked sentence).
Her career background and past troubles also involved Fauci who, according to Mikovits, is guilty of scientific fraud. She details this in her book, “Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science.”
According to Mikovits, Fauci does not appear to have changed his stripes, and is still misleading the public and hiding the truth about SARS-CoV-2, just like he did with the HIV virus and retroviral-associated diseases. “I think the way to think about the background of what's going on right now is to go back to my first interactions with Dr. Tony Fauci when I was a 25-year-old lab technician in the National Cancer Institute. At that time, we had isolated — from blood and saliva — the lymphadenopathy virus. [Lymphadenopathy-associated virus (LAV)] was the name given to it by Luc Montagnier, the Nobel Laureate, [who] first isolated and discovered that virus and its association with HIV/AIDS.11In that situation, Fauci delayed the serology testing [to find out] who was exposed [to HIV]. It was politicized such that the only people that were [said to be] susceptible to getting infected with HIV was gay men [and] IV drug users. The country was told not to worry about it. It was only spread through blood and body fluids and shouldn't be a problem for most other people. So, the testing that could have been done wasn't done because of political reasons, and the treatments weren't done because Fauci had patents, and — we didn't know this at the time — the wrong type of treatment was used. That led to the spread and [death] of millions worldwide …”

The Discovery of Human Gammaretroviruses

Ultimately, Mikovits and her colleagues discovered that the HIV virus was spread through a contaminated blood supply. After that, they proceeded to look into other “clearly retroviral-associated diseases,” such as CFS,12 certain kinds of autism, cancers, leukemias and lymphomas.
Gammaretroviruses13 are viruses that can cause cancer, leukemia and immune deficiencies in various animals. Examples include murine leukemia virus, feline leukemia virus and mink focus forming virus. As explained in a 2011 paper on gamma retroviruses:14 “Retroviruses are evolutionary optimized gene carriers that have naturally adapted to their hosts to efficiently deliver their nucleic acids into the target cell chromatin, thereby overcoming natural cellular barriers …Retroviral vectors are fascinating and efficient delivery tools for the transfer of nucleic acids. As a hallmark, all retroviruses are capable of reverse transcribing their single stranded RNA genome into double stranded DNA, which will be stably integrated into the host cell genome.As highly evolved parasites they act in concert with cellular host factors to deliver their nucleic acid into the nucleus, where they exploit the host cell’s machinery for their own replication and long-term expression occurs.”
The key take-home here is that retroviruses are “integrated into the host cell genome,” and infection can result in “long-term expression.” In other words, once they’re in your body, they can remain dormant, only to reactivate when conditions are favorable. In this regard, they’re quite different from your average virus that, when you’re exposed, invades your cells, replicates and causes symptoms, and is eventually eliminated from your body through your immune response.
In 2009, Mikovits and her team discovered and isolated the first human gammaretrovirus family of retroviruses, known then as XMRVs. As mentioned earlier, XMRV stands for “xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus.” Xenotrophic refers to viruses that only replicate in cells other than those of the host species. So, XMRVs are viruses that infect human cells yet are not human viruses.15

My Entire Interview With Judy Mikovits

[ Go to web address for this article at the top of this email to see this 1 hour and 32 minute interview. ]
To reiterate some of the key take-home messages Mikovits delivers in this interview:
• She believes COVID-19 — the disease — is not caused by SARS-CoV-2 alone, but rather that it’s the result of a combination of SARS-CoV-2 (which appears to have been manipulated to include components of HIV that destroys immune function). Previous XMRV (human gammaretroviruses) infection may facilitate SARS-CoV-2 to express the COVID-19 illness.
Put another way, COVID-19 may be initiated by SARS-CoV-2 but dependent upon a preexisting infection with and awakening of other viruses such as XMRV, gamma retroviruses, possibly Lyme and other coinfections, including parasites, and this is why anti-parasitic medications like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin help.
• Blood products and vaccines are contaminated with XMRVs that can damage your immune system and cause CFS, cancer and other chronic diseases. The viruses spread within laboratories as they have adapted to become aerosolized, and contaminate cell lines used in vaccine production and other viral research, including research on coronaviruses.
• Flu vaccines have spread a host of dangerous viruses around the world, which can then interact with SARS COV-2.
• It is possible to develop safer oral vaccines, and interferon alpha could be a valuable treatment alternative against COVID-19. Aside from interferons, other treatment strategies discussed in our interview include hyperbaric oxygen therapy, cannabinoids (CBD), peptide T and antioxidant support.
• SARS-CoV-2 is more dangerous and virulent than typical coronaviruses because it includes sequences of HIV, SARS and another virus, which enable it to infect more than just your respiratory epithelium. It can also infect blood cells and hematopoeitic organs such as the spleen.
Last but not least, if this topic intrigues you, be sure to pick up a copy of her new book, “Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science.” You can also find more information on her website, plaguethebook.com.- Sources and References

About the guest: Dr. Judy A. Mikovits earned her BA in chemistry with a specialization in biology from the University of Virginia in 1980 and her PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology from George Washington University in 1992. In her 35-year quest to understand and treat chronic diseases, she has co-authored seminal papers culminating at least a decade of research in each of four fields: immunology, natural products chemistry, epigenetics, and HIV/AIDs drug development. In 2006, she became attracted to the plight of families with neuroimmune diseases including ME/CFS and autism. Dr. Mikovits has been primarily responsible for demonstrating the relationship between environmentally acquired immune dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and these diseases.

Dr. Mikovits has published more than 50 peer-reviewed articles, many in the world’s top medical journals and she has been profiled in Discover magazine as well as the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. Her pioneering work during her 20-year career at the National Cancer Institute includes the discovery of the modulation of DNA methylation machinery by human retro viral infection and the development of the concept of inflammatory cytokines and chemokine signatures of infection and disease, which was first published in 1999, when she directed the Laboratory of Antiviral Drug Mechanisms in developing therapeutics and diagnostics for HIV/AIDS and AIDS associated malignancies.
Subscribe to Valuetainment for weekly videos http://bit.ly/2aPEwD4 PBD Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/patrickbetd... PBD Twitter: https://twitter.com/patrickbetdavid PBD Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-b... Intro song : “Sweet Victory” by R-Mean. Available on all digital platforms courtesy of Pentagon Records LLC Link: http://bit.ly/36uToQT Music selection used through agreement with Epidemic Sound http://bit.ly/2B8DxK1
To reach the Valuetainment team you can email: info@valuetainment.com
=================================================================================
3. Here is a shorter video interview: 16 minutes, 9 seconds, that focuses on the fraudulent actions of Dr. Fauci.
at: https://www.trunews.com/stream/edward-s-interview-of-dr-judy-mikovits-mp4

APR 29
In this interview, a 40-year Biomedical Research Scientist named Dr. Judy Mikovits, Ph.D, reveals troubling information about her career at the U.S. National Institute of Health and her run-ins with the now infamous Dr. Anthony Fauci, the author of what she called a “pandemic of corruption.”
Beginning in 1980 she details how a cabal operating like mafia-thugs inside the American medical establishment worked to silence, intimidate, and destroy her for what she discovered about a retrovirus and its connection to cancer, HIV, and the current international scourge of coronavirus.
Dr. Mikovits began working at the NIH’s National Cancer Institute as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Molecular Virology with Frank Ruscetti, a pioneer in the field of human retro virology, where she helped isolate the HIV virus and link it to AIDS in 1983. At the time Dr. Fauci was her boss and he slyly intervened to delay by 6 months the publication of a critical paper which could have increased the speed of mass HIV testing, and thus allowed AIDS to spread globally, all while Dr. Fauci’s protégé Robert Gallo replicated, published and claimed credit for the discovery, and helped his mentor win a promotion in 1984 to his current position as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Dr. Fauci’s scheme didn’t blunt Dr. Mikovits rise however and in 2006 she became director of the Whittemore Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease and continued her collaboration with Dr. Ruscetti in a search for the cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) which suddenly became an epidemic in the 1980s. CFS was initially dismissed as a psychosomatic “yuppie flu" caused when women lost their mind and temperance in corporate jobs, but Dr. Mikovits dispelled that sexist propaganda when she discovered that 67% of affected women carried a virus called Xenotropic Murine Leukemia related Virus (XMRV), a virus present in only 4% of healthy women.
Dr. Mikovits discovered that many women with XMRV bore children who were later diagnosed with autism and that it was also associated with prostate, breast, ovarian cancers, leukemia, and multiple myeloma.
Drs. Mikovits and Ruscetti publishes this research in the peer-reviewed journal Science in 2009 but we’re perplexed by a finding by other researchers who linked the first CFS outbreak to a polio vaccine given to doctors and nurses that resulted in the “1934 Los Angeles County Hospital Epidemic.”
That polio vaccine was cultivated on pulverized mouse brains, and Dr. Mikovits, building on the fact that retroviruses from dead animals can survive in cell lines and permanently contaminate vaccines, realized through her study and was rightfully shocked that the XMRV Virus was present in the MMR, Polio and Encephalitis vaccines given to American children and soldiers.
Instead of praise for this potentially life saving discovery, Dr. Fauci ordered Dr. Mikovits to keep her mouth shut, and when she refused, he called her a “fugitive from justice” before illegally confiscated her work books and hard drives, drove her from government work and blacklisted her from receiving NIH grants, effectively ending her science career.
For her stand she was arrested six months in southern California and jailed without bail for five days, on an “out of county warrant” from Washoe County, Nevada, for allegedly taking lab notebooks, a computer, and other material from the Whittemore Peterson Institute in Reno, Nevada, after being fired.
The arrest came at the time she was served with a lawsuit seeking a restraining order to block Dr. Mikovits’ destruction of data which her former employer WPI claimed belonged to the institute. The charges were ultimately dropped, and she was freed, but not before she was given an ultimatum by Dr. Fauci to lie and say she was wrong about her dangerous discoveries.
Dr. Mikovits said: “I was just dragged out of my house in shackles… I refused to denounce the data… we have the data… they basically said tell everybody you made it all up and you can go home. If you don’t, we’ll destroy you. And they did.”
On the arrest, Assistant District Attorney John Helzer, who filed the dismissal, said: “There’s a lot going on with the federal government and different levels that wasn’t occurring when we first became involved with prosecuting this case. And we have witness issues that have arisen.”
Dr. Mikovits was also called on as a witness for the federal government against her former employer, Harvey Whittemore, for Illegal campaign contributions to U. S. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid.
Dr. Mikovits’ extensive resume speaks for itself, as do the 51 peer-reviewed scientific papers she has published. Famed environmental lawyer and vaccine awareness advocate RFK, Jr. says Dr. Mikovits is among her generation’s most accomplished scientists.
Now hear the accomplished scientist deliver a damning dossier on the matrix of deceivers that attempted to destroy her, and how the NIH grants stripped from her work were redirected to Chinese scientists working on Bat coronavirus in Wuhan.

The Truth About Fauci Featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits

RFK, Jr.: Judy Mikovits is among her generation’s most accomplished scientists.She joined NIH in 1980 as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Molecular Virology at the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Mikovits began a 20-year collaboration with Frank Ruscetti, a pioneer in the field of human retro virology. She helped Dr Russetti isolate the HIV virus + link it to #AIDS in 1983. Her NIH boss Anthony Fauci delayed publication of that critical paper for 6 months to let his protégé Robert Gallo replicate, publish and claim credit. The delay in mass HIV testing let AIDS further spread around the globe + helped Fauci win promotion to director NIAID.

In 2006, Dr Mikovits became director of Whittemore Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease + collaborated with Dr Ruscetti searching for the cause of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome which suddenly became epidemic in the 1980s. The male dominated medical community dismissed CFS as psychosomatic “yuppie flu" caused when fragile females cracked in corporate jobs. Dr. Mikovits discovered that 67% of affected women carried a virus—called Xenotropic Murine Leukemia related Virus—that appeared in healthy women only 4% of the time.

XMRV is also associated with prostate, breast, ovarian cancers, leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Many women with XMRV bore children with autism. In 2009, Drs. Mikovits and Ruscetti published their explosive findings in the journal Science. But the question remained: How was XMRV getting into people?

Other researchers linked the first CFS outbreak to a polio vaccine given to doctors and nurses that resulted in the "1934 Los Angeles County Hospital Epidemic." That vaccine was cultivated on pulverized mouse brains. Retroviruses from dead animals can survive in cell lines and permanently contaminate vaccines.

Dr Mikovits’ studies suggested that the XMRV Virus was present in the MMR, Polio + Encephalitis vaccines given to American children + soldiers.

Dr Fauci ordered Mikovits to keep her mouth shut. When she refused, he illegally confiscated her work books and hard drives, drove her from government work + blackballed her from receiving NIH grants ending her science career. XMRV remains in American vaccines.