Archive for the ‘Constance Cumbey’ Category

The following is a response from the author of the book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, Constance Cumbey, to the recent blog posting titled “The Real Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow” which can be found at this link:

Clearly the Jews are equally a target of New Age planners along with Christians — Catholic and Protestant, and even Moslems. A key strategy is to pit target groups off against each other. One only has to read the Alice Bailey books to see that Jews are the most despised of all the New Age targets. I have made clear links between the Historical Revisionist Movement and the New Age Movement, between Eustace Mullins, Ezra Pound etc and the New Age Movement. The New Agers label the “rainbow” as “antahkarana” or “rainbow bridge between the personality and oversoul.

I do not know you, but your site looks disturbingly like anti-Jewish propaganda to me. Please do not imply that I endorse such. I do not.

CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY

In response I should say that I have not implied that Constance Cumbey endorses anti-“Jewish” propaganda. Neither have I written anything about Ezra Pound or Eustace Mullins, which begs the question, what do these things have to do with what I have written? This wouldn’t be an attempt to imply an endorsement of Pound, Mullins and New Ageism from me, would it? Perhaps Mrs. Cumbey will extend me the same courtesy which she asks for herself.

I will make clear that I do see virtue in the practice of historical revisionism in it’s best form, which is the reassessment of historical people, places and events in light of new evidence. I fail to see how any person who honors truth could be opposed to this concept. To reject it would be to allow propaganda and errors which often become part of the established historical record to remain set in stone. If Cumbey is opposed to historical revisionism, that’s her right, but to imply that historical revisionism is directly connected with the New Age movement is disingenuous at best, and to those who know better, it’s rather a joke.

I should add, since Cumbey has brought it up, that I find Ezra Pound’s poem “With Usura” to contain insight which today’s “Christians” should aspire to, but that’s hardly an endorsement of Pound’s Gnostic tendencies or affiliations; W. B. Yeats and the Golden Dawn, for instance.

I must say I don’t enjoy writing this response. I found Mrs. Cumbey’s book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow to be informative when it was first published in the early 80’s. I had no idea what direction Mrs. Cumbey’s research had taken since that book was published. Surely, she could be forgiven for not making the connection between the rainbow and the Noahide movement of Judaism (which predates Alice Bailey by millenia) 25 years ago when reliable information on the occult and Judaism was more difficult to come by. But that’s not so much the case today.

Since Mrs. Cumbey has written a response to my blog posting on the Noahide movement and it’s symbol, the rainbow, I must assume that she has read it, but in her response she has studiously ignored the content of that posting including the quotes from the Talmud, Mishneh Torah, the Encyclopaedia Judaica, a joint Rabbinic Council-Pontifical Commission document, U.S. laws and presidential proclamations, news articles and video clips cited, choosing instead to imply that it’s all just “anti-‘Jewish’ propaganda” and expressing concern that she may be associated with it. Fear not, Mrs. Cumbey. It’s clear to me now that you have no fellowship with the kind of research conducted here, and I wouldn’t think of associating your work with it.

I do hope that you will give the matter further consideration, however, lest the true hidden danger of the rainbow remain hidden to your readers.

P.S. I do realize that there are anti-“semitic” elements within occult movements, Mrs. Cumbey. Anti-“semitism” is a very important tool of the rabbis and Zionists. Consider this: is it likely that the world would have extended the Zionists a blank check to build a “Jewish” state called “Israel” on someone else’s land–to kill and drive off the land’s occupants–if the Nazi persecutions had not taken place beforehand? I highly doubt it. Many have called Hitler the true founding father of the “Jewish” state and as ironic as it may seem on the surface, I find no fault in that statement. This apparently ironic, but quite logical dialectic is clear to see in the thinking of one of the founders of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl:

It is essential that the sufferings of Jews … become worse … this will assist in realization of our plans … I have an excellent idea … I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth … The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends. (Diaries of Theodore Herzl, Part I, p. 16)

Everything depends upon our propelling force. And what is our propelling force? The misery of the Jews. (Theodore Herzl, A Jewish State, p. 8)

Rabbi E. Schwartz further clarified:

“To achieve their goal of statehood the Zionists have always deliberately provoked anti-Semitism … Their interest was not to save Jews, on the contrary, more spilling of Jewish blood would strengthen their demand of the nations for the creation of their state.” (New York Times, May 18, 1993)

Whatever anti-“semitism” that exists in occult movements of the West, whether real or mocked, most often serves the purposes of the Zionist movement. The Nazi movement is the strongest case in point. Most Western occult movements (Masonry in particular, with it’s fixation on the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem) are Zionist at the core.

And it is plain to see that occultists pair target groups off against each other, as you say. One only need observe how Skull and Bones member, George W. Bush and his Zionist handlers have pitted “Judeo-Christians” against Muslims in a misnamed “war on terror” which is in reality a war on Amalak, the eternal enemy of the rabbis, and a war for Israeli dominion in the Middle East.

I hope that you will consider your own point more deeply. As the traditions, cultures and religions of the world–mostly Christendom–are broken down, the tradition of Judaism is being simultaneously built up. As sovereign nations around the world are being slowly dissolved into large unions, a “Jewish” nation is simultaneously being unnaturally propped up at astronomical expense to outside sources from where the required resources are extracted. The Christian nations that are having their soveriegnty and religion robbed from them are forced to finance the building of a “Jewish” state. If the New Age movement is the true force behind the deChristianization of the West, the fruit of it’s labor certainly seems to benefit the “Jewish” state. How could this possibly take place if the “all-powerful” New Age movement were truly against it?

Anti-“Jewish” quotes from Alice Bailey are interesting at most to me, Mrs. Cumbey. I am a Christian, and Jesus Christ said that it’s by their fruits that you will know them, not by their rhetoric.

The following is a response from the author of the book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, Constance Cumbey, to the recent blog posting titled “The Real Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow” which can be found at this link:

Clearly the Jews are equally a target of New Age planners along with Christians — Catholic and Protestant, and even Moslems. A key strategy is to pit target groups off against each other. One only has to read the Alice Bailey books to see that Jews are the most despised of all the New Age targets. I have made clear links between the Historical Revisionist Movement and the New Age Movement, between Eustace Mullins, Ezra Pound etc and the New Age Movement. The New Agers label the “rainbow” as “antahkarana” or “rainbow bridge between the personality and oversoul.

I do not know you, but your site looks disturbingly like anti-Jewish propaganda to me. Please do not imply that I endorse such. I do not.

CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY

In response I should say that I have not implied that Constance Cumbey endorses anti-“Jewish” propaganda. Neither have I written anything about Ezra Pound or Eustace Mullins, which begs the question, what do these things have to do with what I have written? This wouldn’t be an attempt to imply an endorsement of Pound, Mullins and New Ageism from me, would it? Perhaps Mrs. Cumbey will extend me the same courtesy which she asks for herself.

I will make clear that I do see virtue in the practice of historical revisionism in it’s best form, which is the reassessment of historical people, places and events in light of new evidence. I fail to see how any person who honors truth could be opposed to this concept. To reject it would be to allow propaganda and errors which often become part of the established historical record to remain set in stone. If Cumbey is opposed to historical revisionism, that’s her right, but to imply that historical revisionism is directly connected with the New Age movement is disingenuous at best, and to those who know better, it’s rather a joke.

I should add, since Cumbey has brought it up, that I find Ezra Pound’s poem “With Usura” to contain insight which today’s “Christians” should aspire to, but that’s hardly an endorsement of Pound’s Gnostic tendencies or affiliations; W. B. Yeats and the Golden Dawn, for instance.

I must say I don’t enjoy writing this response. I found Mrs. Cumbey’s book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow to be informative when it was first published in the early 80’s. I had no idea what direction Mrs. Cumbey’s research had taken since that book was published. Surely, she could be forgiven for not making the connection between the rainbow and the Noahide movement of Judaism (which predates Alice Bailey by millenia) 25 years ago when reliable information on the occult and Judaism was more difficult to come by. But that’s not so much the case today.

Since Mrs. Cumbey has written a response to my blog posting on the Noahide movement and it’s symbol, the rainbow, I must assume that she has read it, but in her response she has studiously ignored the content of that posting including the quotes from the Talmud, Mishneh Torah, the Encyclopaedia Judaica, a joint Rabbinic Council-Pontifical Commission document, U.S. laws and presidential proclamations, news articles and video clips cited, choosing instead to imply that it’s all just “anti-‘Jewish’ propaganda” and expressing concern that she may be associated with it. Fear not, Mrs. Cumbey. It’s clear to me now that you have no fellowship with the kind of research conducted here, and I wouldn’t think of associating your work with it.

I do hope that you will give the matter further consideration, however, lest the true hidden danger of the rainbow remain hidden to your readers.

P.S. I do realize that there are anti-“semitic” elements within occult movements, Mrs. Cumbey. Anti-“semitism” is a very important tool of the rabbis and Zionists. Consider this: is it likely that the world would have extended the Zionists a blank check to build a “Jewish” state called “Israel” on someone else’s land–to kill and drive off the land’s occupants–if the Nazi persecutions had not taken place beforehand? I highly doubt it. Many have called Hitler the true founding father of the “Jewish” state and as ironic as it may seem on the surface, I find no fault in that statement. This apparently ironic, but quite logical dialectic is clear to see in the thinking of one of the founders of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl:

It is essential that the sufferings of Jews … become worse … this will assist in realization of our plans … I have an excellent idea … I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth … The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends. (Diaries of Theodore Herzl, Part I, p. 16)

Everything depends upon our propelling force. And what is our propelling force? The misery of the Jews. (Theodore Herzl, A Jewish State, p. 8)

Rabbi E. Schwartz further clarified:

“To achieve their goal of statehood the Zionists have always deliberately provoked anti-Semitism … Their interest was not to save Jews, on the contrary, more spilling of Jewish blood would strengthen their demand of the nations for the creation of their state.” (New York Times, May 18, 1993)

Whatever anti-“semitism” that exists in occult movements of the West, whether real or mocked, most often serves the purposes of the Zionist movement. The Nazi movement is the strongest case in point. Most Western occult movements (Masonry in particular, with it’s fixation on the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem) are Zionist at the core.

And it is plain to see that occultists pair target groups off against each other, as you say. One only need observe how Skull and Bones member, George W. Bush and his Zionist handlers have pitted “Judeo-Christians” against Muslims in a misnamed “war on terror” which is in reality a war on Amalak, the eternal enemy of the rabbis, and a war for Israeli dominion in the Middle East.

I hope that you will consider your own point more deeply. As the traditions, cultures and religions of the world–mostly Christendom–are broken down, the tradition of Judaism is being simultaneously built up. As sovereign nations around the world are being slowly dissolved into large unions, a “Jewish” nation is simultaneously being unnaturally propped up at astronomical expense to outside sources from where the required resources are extracted. The Christian nations that are having their soveriegnty and religion robbed from them are forced to finance the building of a “Jewish” state. If the New Age movement is the true force behind the deChristianization of the West, the fruit of it’s labor certainly seems to benefit the “Jewish” state. How could this possibly take place if the “all-powerful” New Age movement were truly against it?

Anti-“Jewish” quotes from Alice Bailey are interesting at most to me, Mrs. Cumbey. I am a Christian, and Jesus Christ said that it’s by their fruits that you will know them, not by their rhetoric.

Some of you may have read this book, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, by Constance Cumbey, a book on the New Age movement in which it is said that true Christians would not make it into the New Age alive. Have you made the connection that this book does not make?

The rainbow is the symbol of the Noahide movement–the movement to bring humanity under a rabbinic system of double standards called “Noahide Law” enforced by subsidiary courts of a Sanhedrin based in Jerusalem.

From Chabad Lubavitch website, noahide.org:

The Seven Noachide laws are general commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see the Rambam’s Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital punishment in Torah are: S’kilah – Stoning; S’rifah – Burning; Hereg – Decapitation; Henek – Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a, b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).

“A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

“A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

From the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

“… violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).”(Encyclopaedia Judaica, “Noahide Laws”)

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

Some of you may have read this book, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, by Constance Cumbey, a book on the New Age movement in which it is said that true Christians would not make it into the New Age alive. Have you made the connection that this book does not make?

The rainbow is the symbol of the Noahide movement–the movement to bring humanity under a rabbinic system of double standards called “Noahide Law” enforced by subsidiary courts of a Sanhedrin based in Jerusalem.

From Chabad Lubavitch website, noahide.org:

The Seven Noachide laws are general commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see the Rambam’s Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital punishment in Torah are: S’kilah – Stoning; S’rifah – Burning; Hereg – Decapitation; Henek – Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a, b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).

“A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

“A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

From the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

“… violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).”(Encyclopaedia Judaica, “Noahide Laws”)

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

Some of you may have read this book, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, by Constance Cumbey, a book on the New Age movement in which it is said that true Christians would not make it into the New Age alive. Have you made the connection that this book does not make?

The rainbow is the symbol of the Noahide movement–the movement to bring humanity under a rabbinic system of double standards called “Noahide Law” enforced by subsidiary courts of a Sanhedrin based in Jerusalem.

From Chabad Lubavitch website, noahide.org:

The Seven Noachide laws are general commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see the Rambam’s Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital punishment in Torah are: S’kilah – Stoning; S’rifah – Burning; Hereg – Decapitation; Henek – Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a, b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).

“A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

“A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

From the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

“… violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).”(Encyclopaedia Judaica, “Noahide Laws”)

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)