Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Syria: US imperialism and diplomacy

Syria: U.S. imperialism and diplomacy

The much ballyhooed Geneva II peace
talks, which were supposed to bring about peace in Syria, ended on Jan.
31 with no agreement for one very good reason: The U.S had no intention
of seeking any real peace agreement, but was intent on using the forum
as a background for propaganda and as a way to deceive and weaken the
Syrian government.

No concessions were offered by the imperialists and their allies,
while they continued to arm the “rebel” forces both directly and
indirectly, through such countries as Saudi Arabia. Indeed, some
analysts believe that the U.S. is trying to achieve through diplomacy
what it is failing to do on the battlefield.

For example, Patrick Cockburn, writing in the Jan. 31 Independent
(Britain), notes, “For negotiations to have any hope of success they
must reflect the balance of power on the ground in Syria. … [Syrian]
forces hold 13 out 14 Syrian provincial capitals and are slowly retaking
districts in Damascus, Homs and Aleppo captured by rebels in 2012.”

A strong indication of the lack of seriousness for real peace can be
ascertained by looking at a list of the attendees, which included more
than 40 countries and organizations from around the world, many of them
far removed from the Middle East. Included were all the NATO countries
and other stalwart U.S. allies, such as Japan and Australia, and just
about every enemy of the Syrian government that could be found.

Pointedly not included was one of Syria’s allies, Iran, though it was
at first invited to the talks by the United Nations and then
humiliatingly disinvited because of objections from the U.S. and Saudi
Arabia. The Jan. 20 New York Times called this move a “fitting prelude”
to the conference.

Another indication of the imperialists’ deception can be seen in the
tactics used to get the Syrians, as well as China and the Russian
Federation, to attend the conference in the first place. The U.S. and
others stressed that there were no “preconditions” to the talks,
including the role of President Bashar al-Assad in any future government
of Syria.Syria demands apology from Kerry

The talks had scarcely begun when Secretary of State John Kerry
loudly and insultingly attacked Assad, stating in the Jan. 22 Huffington
Post that “there is no way that Syrian President Bashar Assad can be
part of a transitional government.”

This was part of a weeklong cacophony of propaganda from the Western
media attacking the Syrian regime, complete with pictures of victims and
statistics of the civil war, for which total responsibility was
unjustly attributed to the Syrian government.

While the propaganda exploited the plight of people in the Old City
of Homs, which was being besieged by the government, what was left
unreported, according to the Independent, was the fact that the rebels
are conducting their own siege of 45,000 people in the towns of Zahraa
and Nubl, outside Aleppo. In fact, during the talks relief was sent to
Homs, and all who wanted to were permitted to leave.

According to the Feb. 1 Alalam, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid
al-Muallem lashed back, calling on the U.S to issue an apology for
Kerry’s remarks. He also slammed the hypocrisy of the “unjust”
international community that imposes sanctions on a war-torn country.

“It is an ‘international community’ that adopts double standards
policy, and is mostly dominated by the U.S. … They dominate the U.N.
Security Council and the U.N.”

Muallem questioned how the West could be involved in the Geneva talks
and at the same time “impose sanctions on the Syrian people and
children?”

Alalam on Feb. 2 reported that Muallem asked European Union Foreign
Policy Chief Catherine Ashton to explain how the West can impose a ban
on food products, yet at the same time discuss the issue of humanitarian
aid shipments.

Meanwhile, more than 200 pro-Syrian demonstrators marched outside the
building where the talks were held. Similar demonstrations have
occurred around the world in opposition to the unjust U.S. intervention
in Syria.

Articles copyright 1995-2014 Workers World. Verbatim copying and
distribution is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this
notice is preserved.

About Me

We do not open attachments. Stop e-mailing them. Threats and abusive e-mail are not covered by any privacy rule. This isn't to the reporters at a certain paper (keep 'em coming, they are funny). This is for the likes of failed comics who think they can threaten via e-mails and then whine, "E-mails are supposed to be private." E-mail threats will be turned over to the FBI and they will be noted here with the names and anything I feel like quoting.
This also applies to anyone writing to complain about a friend of mine. That's not why the public account exists.