QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2009

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from to

Commission file number 000-51201

BofI HOLDING,
INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

33-0867444

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

12777 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92130

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(858) 350-6200

(Registrants telephone
number and area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter Period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large filer in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock on the last practicable date: 8,164,914 shares of common stock as of October 30,
2009.

The condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of BofI Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Bank of Internet USA (the Bank and collectively with BofI Holding Inc., the Company). All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements, presented in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), are unaudited and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of financial condition and results of operations for
the interim periods. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Results for the three months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year as a
whole. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. Management evaluated subsequent events through November 4, 2009, the date the condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued. We have not evaluated subsequent events relating to these financial statements after this date. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended June 30, 2009 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment Securities. We classify investment securities as either
trading, available for sale or held to maturity. Trading securities are those securities for which we have elected fair value accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 159, see footnote 3. Trading securities are recorded at fair value with changes
in fair value recorded in earnings each period. Securities available for sale are reported at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effects, excluded from operations and reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The fair values of securities traded in active markets are obtained from market quotes. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, we determine the fair value from our internal pricing
models. Securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and recorded at amortized cost. Amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of discounts on securities are
recorded as yield adjustments on such securities using the effective interest method. The specific identification method is used for purposes of determining cost in computing realized gains and losses on investment securities sold.

At each reporting date, we monitor our available-for-sale and held to maturity securities for other-than-temporary impairment.
Other-than-temporary impairment losses are recognized in noninterest income with a corresponding reduction in the carrying value of the investment.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level estimated to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the
allowance based on reviews of individual loans and pools of loans, recent loss experience, current economic conditions, the risk characteristics of the various categories of loans and other pertinent factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective
and requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current period operating results and recoveries of loans
previously charged-off. The allowance is decreased by the amount of charge-offs of loans deemed uncollectible.

Under the
allowance for loan loss policy, impairment calculations are determined based on general portfolio data for general reserves and loan level data for specific reserves. Specific loans are evaluated for impairment and are generally classified as
nonperforming or in foreclosure when they are 90 days or more delinquent. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or
interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest
payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if repayment of the loan is expected primarily from the sale of collateral.

General loan loss reserves for real estate loans are calculated by grouping each loan by
collateral type and by grouping the loan-to-value ratios of each loan within the collateral type. An estimated allowance rate for each loan-to-value group within each type of loan is multiplied by the total principal amount in the group to calculate
the required general reserve attributable to that group. Management uses an allowance rate that provides a larger loss allowance for loans with greater loan-to-value ratios. General loss reserves for consumer loans are calculated by grouping each
loan by credit score (e.g. FICO) at origination and applying and estimated allowance to each group. Specific reserves are calculated when an internal asset review of a loan identifies a significant adverse change in the financial position of the
borrower or the value of the collateral. The specific reserve is based on discounted cash flows, observable market prices or the estimated value of underlying collateral.

New Accounting Pronouncements.

On July 1, 2009, the FASBs GAAP
Codification became effective as the sole authoritative source of US GAAP. This codification reorganizes current GAAP for non-governmental entities into a topical index to facilitate accounting research and to provide users additional assurance that
they have referenced all related literature pertaining to a given topic. Existing GAAP prior to the Codification was not altered in compilation of the GAAP Codification. The GAAP Codification encompasses all FASB Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) statements, FASB Staff Positions (FSP), FASB Interpretations (FIN), FASB Derivative Implementation Guides (DIG), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Positions
(SOPS), Accounting Principals Board (APB) Opinions and Accounting Research Bulletins (ARBs) along with the remaining body of GAAP effective as of June 30, 2009. Financial Statements issued for all interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009 will need to reference accounting guidance embodied in the Codification as opposed to referencing the previously authoritative pronouncements. Accounting literature included in the codification is referenced by Topic,
Subtopic, Section and paragraph.

In June 2008, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share,
related to determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. This new guidance addresses whether these types of instruments are participating prior to vesting and, therefore need to be included
in the earning allocation in computing earnings per share under the two class method described in ASC Topic 260. All prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively. The Company adopted this new guidance on
July 1, 2009 which had the effect of treating the Companys unvested restricted stock awards as participating in the earnings allocation when computing earnings per share. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a significant impact
on the Companys earnings per share for any period presented.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2009-05 (ASU 2009-05), which provides amendments to ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a
quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not

available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when
traded as an asset or a quoted price for a similar liability when traded as an asset, or another valuation method that is consistent with the principles of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2009-05 also provides
clarification that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability.
The effective date is the first reporting period beginning after issuance. Accordingly, the Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2009-5 in the fourth quarter 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of the provisions of ASU 2009-5 to have
a material effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 166, Accounting for the Transfer of Financial Assets and Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 Instruments (SFAS 166). Under FASBs Codification at ASC 105-10-65-1-d, SFAS 166 will remain authoritative until integrated
into the FASB Codification. SFAS 166 removes the concept of a special purpose entity (SPE) from Statement 140 and removes the exception of applying FASB Interpretation 46 Variable Interest Entities, to Variable Interest Entities that are SPEs. It
limits the circumstances in which a transferor derecognizes a financial asset. SFAS 166 amends the requirements for the transfer of a financial asset to meet the requirements for sale accounting. The statement is effective for all
interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). Under FASBs
Codification at ASC 105-10-65-1-d, SFAS 167 will remain authoritative until integrated into the FASB Codification. SFAS 167 amends Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest give it a controlling financial interest in the variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for all interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material
impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

3. FAIR VALUE

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1:

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active
exchange market, as well as certain U.S. treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2:

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and whose
value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities
include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models such as discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment
or estimation.

When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair
value. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified in Level 2. The Company considers relevant
and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the nature of the participants are some of the factors the Company uses to help determine whether a market is active and
orderly or inactive and not orderly. Price quotes based upon transactions that are not orderly are not considered to be determinative of fair value and should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value.

If the quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible,
current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, credit spreads, housing value

forecasts, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an
item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.

The following
section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair-value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified.

Securitiestrading.Trading securities are recorded at fair value. The trading portfolio consists of two different
issues of floating-rate debt securities collateralized by pools of bank trust preferred. Recent liquidity and economic uncertainty have made the market for collateralized debt obligations less active or inactive. As quoted market prices are not
available, the Level-3 fair values for these securities are determined by the Company utilizing industry-standard tools to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows available to the securities from the underlying assets. The
Companys expected cash flows are calculated for each security and include the impact of actual and forecasted bank defaults within each collateral pool as well as structural features of the securitys tranche such as lock outs,
subordination and overcollateralization. The forecast of bank defaults in each pool is based upon a quarterly financial update including the trend in non-performing assets, the allowance for loan loss and the banks capital ratios. Also a
factor is the Companys loan loss experience in the local economy in which the bank operates. At September 30, 2009, the Companys forecast of cash flows for both securities includes actual and forecasted defaults totaling 38.1% of
all banks in the collateral pools, up from 12.4% of the banks actually in default. The expected cash flows reflect the Companys best estimate of all pool losses which are then applied to the overcollateralization reserve and the subordinated
tranches to determine the cash flows. The Company selects a discount rate margin based upon the spread between U.S. Treasury rates and the market rates for active credit grades for financial companies. The discount margin when added to the U.S.
Treasury rate determines the discount rate, reflecting primarily market liquidity and interest rate risk since expected credit loss is included in the cash flows. At September 30, 2009, the Company used a weighted average discount margin of 395
basis points above U.S. Treasury rates to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows and the fair value of its trading securities.

The Level-3 fair values determined by the Company for its trading securities rely heavily on managements assumptions as to the future credit performance of the collateral banks, the impact of the
global and regional recession, the timing of forecasted defaults and the discount rate applied to cash flows. The fair value of the trading securities at September 30, 2009 is sensitive to an increase or decrease in the discount rate. An
increase in the discount margin of 100 basis points would have reduced the total fair value of the trading securities and decreased net income before income tax by $588. A decrease in the discount margin of 100 basis points would have increased the
total fair value of the trading securities and increased net income before income tax by $850.

Securitiesavailable
for sale and held to maturity. Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value and consist of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and debt securities issued by U.S. agencies as well as RMBS issued by non-agencies. Held to
maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost and consist of RMBS issued by U.S. agencies as well as RMBS issued by non-agencies. Fair value for U.S. agency securities is generally based on quoted market prices of similar securities used to
form a dealer quote or a pricing matrix. The market for RMBS issued by non-agencies continued to deteriorate in 2008 and 2009. The significant illiquidity in the market impacted the availability and reliability of transparent pricing. As orderly
quoted market prices are not available, the Level-3 fair values for these securities are determined by the Company utilizing industry-standard tools to calculate the net present value of the expected cash flows available to the securities from the
underlying mortgage assets. The Company computes Level-3 fair values for each non-agency RMBS in the same manner (as described below) whether available for sale or held to maturity.

To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan pools, the Company estimates prepayments, defaults, and loss severities based
on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes such as credit score and loan documentation at the time of origination. The Company inputs for each security a
projection of monthly default rates, loss severity rates and voluntary prepayment rates for the underlying mortgages for the remaining life of the security to determine the expected cash flows. The projections of default rates are derived by the
Company from the historic default rate observed in the pool of loans collateralizing the security, increased by (and decreased by) the forecasted increase or decrease in the national unemployment rate. The projections of loss severity rates are
derived by the Company from the historic loss severity rate observed in the pool of loans, increased by (and decreased by) the forecasted decrease or increase in the national home price appreciation (HPA) index. At September 30, 2009, the
Companys projections included increasing monthly default rates through mid 2010 and increasing monthly severity rates through late 2011 for the mortgage loans underlying these securities.

To determine the discount rates used to compute the present value of the expected cash flows for these non-agency RMBS securities, the
Company separates the securities by the borrower characteristics in the underlying pool. Specifically, prime

securities generally have borrowers with higher FICO scores and better documentation of income. Alt-A securities generally have borrowers with a little lower FICO and a little less
documentation of income. Pay-option ARMs are Alt-A securities with borrowers that tend to pay the least amount of principal (or increase their loan balance through negative amortization). The Company calculates separate discount rates
for prime, Alt-A and Pay-option ARM non-agency RMBS securities using market-participant assumptions for risk, capital and return on equity.

Impaired Loans. The fair value of impaired loans with specific write-offs is generally based on recent real estate appraisals or other third-party valuations and analysis of cash flows. These
appraisals and analyses may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and income approaches. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the
comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification for the inputs for determining fair value.

The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

Quoted Prices inActive Marketsfor IdenticalAssets(Level 1)

Significant OtherObservableInputs(Level 2)

SignificantUnobservableInputs(Level 3)

Fair Valueas of September 30,2009

September 30, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets:

Securitiestrading: Collateralized debt obligations

$



$



$

5,299

$

5,299

Securitiesavailable for sale:

U.S. agenciesdebt



58,496



58,496

U.S. agenciesRMBS



73,506



73,506

Non-agency RMBS





143,718

143,718

Totalsecuritiesavailable for sale

$



$

132,002

$

143,718

$

275,720

June 30, 2009

Assets:

Securitiestrading: Collateralized debt obligations

$



$



$

5,445

$

5,445

Securitiesavailable for sale

U.S. agenciesdebt



59,001



59,001

U.S. agenciesRMBS



81,047



81,047

Non-agency RMBS





125,759

125,759

Totalsecuritiesavailable for sale

$



$

140,048

$

125,759

$

265,807

The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair
value on a recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

TradingSecurities

Available forSale Securities

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets

Beginning Balance July 1, 2009

$

5,445

$

125,759

Total gains/(losses)(realized/unrealized):

Included in earnings

(146

)



Included in other comprehensive income



31

Purchases, issuances, and settlements



17,928

Transfers into Level 3





Ending balance September 30, 2009

$

5,299

$

143,718

Impaired loans measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis using the fair value
of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans has a carrying amount of $4,600 after a write-off of $779, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $313 during the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Held to maturity securities measured for impairment on a non-recurring basis have a carrying amount of $43,484 after a charge to income of
$1,390 and recoveries from other comprehensive income of $21 during the three months ended September 30, 2009. These held to maturity securities are valued using level 3 inputs.

Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments at September 30, 2009 and at the year ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:

September 30, 2009

June 30, 2009

CarryingAmount

Fair Value

CarryingAmount

Fair Value

(Dollars in thousands)

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

8,396

$

8,396

$

8,406

$

8,406

Securities trading

5,299

5,299

5,445

5,445

Securities available for sale

275,720

275,720

265,807

265,807

Securities held to maturity

382,481

396,088

350,898

344,612

Stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank

18,848

N/A

18,848

N/A

Loans held for sale

3,365

3,365

3,190

3,190

Loans held for investmentnet

595,140

612,083

615,463

626,588

Accrued interest receivable

6,099

6,099

5,868

5,868

Financial liabilities:

Time deposits and savings

763,513

773,448

648,524

636,479

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

130,000

143,258

130,000

141,660

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

225,988

234,634

262,984

270,893

Federal Reserve Discount Window and other borrowings

105,155

105,155

165,155

165,155

Accrued interest payable

2,020

2,020

2,108

2,108

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest
receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits,
fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due
to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered material.

The Companys non-agency RMBS available for sale portfolio with a total fair value of $143,718 at September 30, 2009 consists of
30 different issues of super senior securities acquired in the 4th quarter ended June 30, 2009 and collateralized by seasoned prime and Alt-A first-lien mortgages.

The non-agency RMBS held-to-maturity portfolio with a carrying value of $318,310 at September 30, 2009 consists of 86 different issues of super senior securities totaling $310,287; one senior-support
security with a carrying value of $6,931 and mezzanine z-tranche securities with a carrying value of $1,094. Debt securities with evidence of credit quality deterioration since issuance and for which it is probable at purchase that the Company will
be unable to collect all of the par value of the security are accounted for under ASC Topic 310, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (ASC Topic 310). Under ASC Topic 310, the excess of cash flows expected at
acquisition over the purchase price is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the security. The Company has one senior support security that it acquired at a significant discount that
evidenced credit deterioration at acquisition and is accounted for under ASC Topic 310. For a cost of $17,740, the Company acquired the senior support security with a contractual par value of $30,560 and accretable and non accretable discounts that
were projected to be $9,015 and $3,805, respectively. Since acquisition, repayments from the security have been received more rapidly than projected at acquisition, but expected total payments have declined, resulting in a determination that the
security was other than temporarily impaired and the recognition of a $1,216 impairment loss during fiscal 2009 and $1,149 during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the security has a remaining contractual par value of
$21,271 and accretable and non-accretable discount are currently projected to be $693 and $11,319, respectively. The Company acquired the mezzanine z-tranche securities in connection with the acquisition of certain super senior Re-remics of
non-agency RMBS collateralized by prime and Alt-A loans. The mezzanine z-tranche securities provide credit support for the senior RMBS (also purchased by the Company) and do not receive cash flow until the senior RMBS are fully repaid. The Company
accounts for its investment in mezzanine z-tranche securities by measuring the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the purchase price (accretable yield) and recognize interest income over the remaining life of the security.

The current face amounts of debt securities available for sale and held to maturity that were pledged to secure borrowings at
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $523,000 and $499,000, respectively.

The securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:

Available for sale securities in loss position for

Less Than 12 Months

More Than 12 Months

Total

Fair Value

GrossUnrealizedLosses

Fair Value

GrossUnrealizedLosses

Fair Value

GrossUnrealizedLosses

(Dollars in thousands)

September 30, 2009

RMBS:

U.S. agencies

$



$



$



$



$



$



Other debt:

U.S. agencies













Total debt securities

$



$



$



$



$



$



June 30, 2009

RMBS:

U.S. agencies

$



$



$

840

$

(3

)

$

840

$

(3

)

Other debt:

U.S. agencies

53,033

(17

)





53,033

(17

)

Total debt securities

$

53,033

$

(17

)

$

840

$

(3

)

$

53,873

$

(20

)

Held to maturity securities in loss position for

Less Than 12 Months

More Than 12 Months

Total

Fair Value

GrossUnrecognizedLosses

Fair Value

GrossUnrecognizedLosses

Fair Value

GrossUnrecognizedLosses

September 30, 2009

RMBS:

U.S. agencies

$

701

$

(3

)

$

154

$



$

855

$

(3

)

Non-agency

104,631

(7,408

)

49,635

(5,897

)

154,266

(13,305

)

Total debt securities

$

105,332

$

(7,411

)

$

49,789

$

(5,897

)

$

155,121

$

(13,308

)

Other debt:

Non-agency













Total other debt













Total

$

105,332

$

(7,411

)

$

49,789

$

(5,897

)

$

155,121

$

(13,308

)

June 30, 2009

RMBS:

U.S. agencies

$



$



$

1,026

$

(5

)

$

1,026

$

(5

)

Non-agency

121,735

(16,509

)

61,468

(8,558

)

183,203

(25,067

)

Total RMBS securities

121,735

(16,509

)

62,494

(8,563

)

184,229

(25,072

)

There were twelve securities that were in a continuous loss position at
September 30, 2009 for a period of more than 12 months. There were twenty-two securities that were in a continuous loss position at June 30, 2009 for a period of more than 12 months.

At September 30, 2009, non-agency RMBS securities with a total amortized cost of
$43,484 were determined to have a impairment loss of $2,833 of which $1,369 was recognized in earnings this period as an other-than-temporary impairment. Of the total impairment of $1,369, impairment of $1,150 related to the Companys one
senior-support RMBS security accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 310 as discussed above. The balance of $219 impairment related to four non-agency RMBS with total amortized cost of $9,357 accounted for under ASC Topic 320, Accounting for
certain investments. In accordance with ASC 320-10-65-65.1, Recognition and Presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, the Company measures its non-agency RMBS in an unrealized loss position at the end of the reporting period for
other-than-temporary impairment by comparing the present value of the cash flows currently expected to be collected from the security with its amortized cost basis. If the calculated present value is lower than the amortized cost, the difference is
the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of its debt securities. The difference between the present value and the fair value of the security (if any) is the noncredit component only if the Company does not intend to sell the
security and will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The credit component of the other-than-temporary-impairment is recorded as a loss in earnings and the noncredit component as a charge to other
comprehensive income, net of the related income tax benefit.

To determine the cash flow expected to be collected and to
calculate the present value for purposes of testing for other-than -temporary impairment, the Company utilizes the same industry-standard tool and the same cash flows as those calculated for Level-3 fair values as discussed in footnote 3. The
Company computes cash flows based upon the cash flows from underlying mortgage loan pools. The Company estimates prepayments, defaults, and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment
rates, interest rates and borrower attributes such as credit score and loan documentation at the time of origination. The Company inputs for each security a projection of monthly default rates, loss severity rates and voluntary prepayment rates for
the underlying mortgages for the remaining life of the security to determine the expected cash flows. The projections of default rates are derived by the Company from the historic default rate observed in the pool of loans collateralizing the
security, increased by (and decreased by) the forecasted increase or decrease in the national unemployment rate. The projections of loss severity rates are derived by the Company from the historic loss severity rate observed in the pool of loans,
increased by (and decreased by) the forecasted decrease or increase in the national home price appreciation (HPA) index. At September 30, 2009, the Companys projections included increasing monthly default rates through mid 2010 and
increasing monthly severity rates through late 2011for the mortgage loans underlying these securities.

In accordance with ASC
Topic 320-10-65-65.1, the discount rates used to compute the present value of the expected cash flows for purposes of testing for the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment are either the implicit rate calculated in each of the
Companys securities at acquisition (as prescribed by ASC Topic 310 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan) or the last accounting yield (as prescribed in ASC Topic 325-40). For securities recorded under ASC Topic 320, the
Company calculates the implicit rate at acquisition based on the contractual terms of the security, considering scheduled payments (and minimum payments in the case of pay-option ARMs) without prepayment assumptions. Once the discount rate (or
discount margin in the case of floating rate securities) is calculated as described above the discount is used in the industry-standard model to calculate the present value of the cash flows.

The Company does not intend to sell and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell those impaired debt
securities or any other debt security in a loss position at September 30, 2009.

The gross gains and losses realized
through earnings upon the sale of available for sale securities were as follows:

Net unrealized gain on investment securities in other comprehensive income

$

2,090

$

1,926

The expected maturity distribution of the Companys mortgage-backed securities
and the contractual maturity distribution of the Companys other debt securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity at September 30, 2009 were:

September 30, 2009

Available for sale

Held to maturity

Trading

AmortizedCost

Fair Value

CarryingAmount

Fair Value

FairValue

(Dollars in thousands)

RMBSU.S. agencies(1):

Due within one year

$

16,466

$

18,888

$

9,803

$

9,963

$



Due one to five years

26,957

28,064

19,716

19,955



Due five to ten years

14,285

14,234

8,013

8,105



Due after ten years

14,096

12,320

5,841

5,975



Total RMBSU.S. agencies(1)

71,804

73,506

43,373

43,998



RMBSNon- agency:

Due within one year

24,286

27,714

47,909

50,289



Due one to five years

62,388

71,064

102,693

110,543



Due five to ten years

18,026

19,519

48,954

51,084



Due after ten years

24,848

25,421

118,754

119,376



Total RMBSNon-agency

129,548

143,718

318,310

331,292



Other debt:

Due within one year

58,483

58,496







Due one to five years





20,798

20,798



Due five to ten years











Due after ten years









5,299

Total other debt

58,483

58,496

20,798

20,798

5,299

Total

$

259,835

$

275,720

$

382,481

$

396,088

$

5,299

(1)

Residential mortgage-backed security (RMBS) distributions include impact of expected prepayments and other

We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated and known risks
in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, our management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at
September 30, 2009, future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.

The assessment of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including
levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, change in volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history.

We provide general loan loss reserves for our RV and auto loans based upon the borrower credit score at the time of origination and our loss experience to date. We provide general loan loss reserves for our mortgage loans based upon the
size and type of the mortgage loan and the loan-to-value ratio. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we have experienced increased charge-offs. If we continue to experience an increase in charge-offs relative to the loan portfolio
size, we may be required to increase our loan loss provisions in the future to provide a larger loss allowance.

The following
table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2009:

SingleFamily

HomeEquity

Multi-family

CommercialReal Estateand Land

RecreationalVehicles andAutos

Other

Total

(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at July 1, 2009

$

1,113

$

280

$

1,680

$

179

$

1,475

$

27

$

4,754

Provision for loan loss

16

22

163

(2

)

1,795

6

2,000

Charge-offs

(13

)

(47

)

(270

)



(1,154

)



(1,484

)

Recoveries















Balance at September 30, 2009

$

1,116

$

255

$

1,573

$

177

$

2,116

$

33

$

5,270

Nonperforming Loans.At September 30, 2009, $4,600 of
impaired loans had no specific allowance allocations. The average carrying value of impaired loans was $3,720 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and $2,373 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The interest income recognized during
the periods of impairment is insignificant for those loans impaired at September 30, 2009. Loans past due 90 days or more which were still accruing were $3,225 at September 30, 2009 and $4,715 at June 30, 2009. For loans past due 90
days or more and still accruing, the Company has received principal and interest from the servicer, even though the borrower is delinquent. The Company considers the servicers recovery of such advances in evaluating whether such loans should
continue to accrue. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors that we consider in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and
payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or the fair value of the
collateral if repayment of the loan is expected from the sale of collateral. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans plus other foreclosed real estate or assets owned, net. At September 30, 2009, our nonperforming loans totaled $4,600,
or 0.76% of total gross loans and our total nonperforming assets totaled $9,632, or 0.73% of total assets.

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at
the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Companys common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is recognized
over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

The Company has two stock incentive plans, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (2004 Plan) and the 1999 Stock Option Plan (1999
Plan, and, together with the 2004 Plan, the Plans), which provide for the granting of non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other awards to employees,
directors and consultants. The Company terminated the 1999 Plan in November 2007 and no new option awards will be made under the 1999 Plan.

Agreement with Certain Directors to Exchange Fair Value of Options for Restricted Stock

On May 21, 2009, the Company approved a form of Exchange Agreement available to five directors of the Company who in 1999 were issued non-qualified stock option contracts which expire August 13, 2009. Given the short time frame to
exercise the stock option contracts which entitle the five directors to a total of 179,457 shares of common at a price of $4.19 per share, the non affected directors of the Company determined it was in the best interest of the Company to provide a
fair value exchange option. The Exchange Agreement allows these fully vested options to be exchanged for a smaller number of fully vested restricted stock shares under the conditions set forth in the Companys 2004 Plan. The Companys 2004
Plan allows each director to receive fewer restricted stock shares (net settle) and use the surrendered shares to fund income tax liabilities. On May 28, 2009, each of the five directors, entered into the Exchange Agreement and may select a
future date to cancel their 1999 fully-vested stock option contracts and receive a fully-vested restricted stock grant under the 2004 Plan based upon the fair value of the option contracts cancelled.

At year ended June 30, 2009, three of the directors have made the conversion surrendering 81,973 options and received 27,935 shares of
restricted common stock for $179 (including $73 income tax benefit). The remaining two directors made the exchange in August 2009, surrendering 97,482 options and received 40,349 shares of restricted common stock for $289 (including $118 income tax
benefit).

Stock Options. The Companys income before income taxes for the quarters
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 included stock option compensation expense of $18 and $76, with a total income tax benefit of $7 and $31, respectively. At September 30, 2009, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock
option grants aggregated $33 which is expected to be recognized in future periods as follows:

A summary of stock option activity under the Plans during the period July 1, 2008 to
September 30, 2009 is presented below:

Number ofShares

AverageExercise PricePer Share

Outstanding  July 1, 2008

906,244

$

7.09

Converted

(81,973

)

$

4.19

Forfeitures

(63,900

)

$

8.06

Outstanding  June 30, 2009

760,371

$

7.32

Converted

(97,482

)

$

4.19

Exercised

(34,684

)

$

4.19

Outstanding  September 30, 2009

628,205

$

7.98

Options exercisable  June 30, 2009

743,213

$

6.96

Options exercisable  September 30, 2009

617,309

$

7.99

The following table summarizes information as of September 30, 2009 concerning currently
outstanding and exercisable options:

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

ExercisePrices

NumberOutstanding

Weighted-AverageRemainingContractual Life(Years)

NumberExercisable

ExercisePrice

$

4.19

146,444

1.0

146,444

$

4.19

$

7.35

120,200

6.8

109,304

$

7.35

$

8.50

7,500

6.2

7,500

$

8.50

$

9.20

7,500

5.9

7,500

$

9.20

$

9.50

164,000

5.8

164,000

$

9.50

$

10.00

181,561

3.6

181,561

$

10.00

$

11.00

1,000

2.8

1,000

$

11.00

$

7.98

628,205

4.2

617,309

$

7.99

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable under
the Plans at September 30, 2009 were $619 and $619, respectively.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock
Units. Under the Companys 2004 Plan, employees and directors are eligible to receive grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. The Company determines stock-based compensation expense using the fair value method required by
ASC Topic 718, Share-based Payment. In accordance with ASC Topic 718, the fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units is equal to the closing sale price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.

During the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 the Companys Board of Directors granted 36,340 and
37,685 restricted stock units respectively, to employees and directors. All restricted stock unit awards granted during these quarters vest over three years, one-third on each anniversary date.

The Companys income before income taxes for the quarters ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 included restricted stock compensation expense of $114 and $87, respectively, with a total income tax benefit of $47 and $36, respectively. The Company recognizes compensation expense based upon the grant-date fair value divided
equally across the service periods between each vesting date. At September 30, 2009, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested grants aggregated $1,030 and is expected to be recognized in future periods as follows:

Stock AwardCompensationExpense

Fiscal year remainder:

2010

$

398

2011

478

2012

131

2013

23

Total

$

1,030

The following table presents the status and changes in non-vested restricted stock
and restricted stock unit grants from July 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009:

Restricted Stockand restrictedstock unitShares

Weighted-AverageGrant-DateFair Value

Non-vested balance at July 1, 2008

127,071

$

7.13

Granted

95,335

$

6.03

Vested

(61,502

)

$

7.09

Forfeitures

(7,800

)

$

6.57

Non-vested balance at June 30, 2009

153,104

$

6.49

Granted

36,340

$

8.13

Vested

(16,259

)

$

6.45

Forfeitures



$



Non-vested balance at September 30, 2009

173,185

$

6.83

2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In October 2004, the Companys
Board of Directors and stockholders approved the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is intended to qualify as an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. An aggregate of 500,000 shares of
the Companys common stock has been reserved for issuance and will be available for purchase under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. At September 30, 2009, there have been no shares issued under the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Effective July 1, 2009, the Company implemented new guidance impacting ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, which clarifies that unvested stock-based compensation awards containing non-forfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (collectively, dividends) are participating securities and should be included in the EPS calculation using the two-class method. The Company grants restricted stock and RSUs to certain directors and
employees under its stock-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the
FSPs definition of participating securities. Under the two class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive
dividends. EPS data for the prior periods were revised as required by the FSP.

The following table presents the calculation
of basic and diluted EPS:

Three Months EndedSeptember 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2009

2008

Earnings Per Common Share

Net income (loss)

$

3,708

$

(1,817

)

Preferred stock dividends

(173

)

(171

)

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

$

3,535

$

(1,988

)

Average common shares issued and outstanding

8,114,929

8,285,568

Average unvested Restricted stock grant and RSU shares

147,542

135,706

Total qualifying shares

8,262,471

8,421,274

Earnings (loss) per common share

$

0.43

$

(0.24

)

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

$

3,535

$

(1,988

)

Preferred stock dividends to dilutive convertible preferred

95



Dilutive net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

$

3,630

$

(1,988

)

Average common shares issued and outstanding

8,262,471

8,421,274

Dilutive effect of stock options

79,030



Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock

531,690



Total dilutive common shares issued and outstanding

8,873,191

8,421,274

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

$

0.41

$

(0.24

)

Options and stock grants of 481,761 and 895,244 shares for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in determining diluted earnings per share, as they were anti-dilutive.

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Credit-Related Financial Instruments. The
Company is a party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. At September 30, 2009, the Company had $28.1 million in commitments to
originate or purchase loans and investment securities and $11.9 million in commitments to sell loans.

9. RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted related party loans collateralized by real
property to principal officers, directors and their affiliates. There were three new related party loans granted during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, totaling $2,071, and no new loans granted during the three months ended September 30, 2008.

MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides information about the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, off balance sheet items,
contractual obligations and capital resources of BofI Holding, Inc. and subsidiary. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and the results of
our operations. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this
report.

Some matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as
estimate, project, anticipate, expect, intends, believe, will, or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of
strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the environment in which the Company operates and projections of future performance. Forward-looking statements are
inherently unreliable and actual results may vary. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include economic conditions, changes in the interest rate environment, changes in the competitive marketplace,
risks associated with credit quality and other risk factors summarized in Part II, Item 1A under the heading Risk Factors in this report, and discussed in greater detail under the heading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  Factors That May Affect Our Performance in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this
report, which are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing information.

General

Our company, BofI Holding, Inc., is the holding company for Bank of Internet USA, a consumer-focused,
nationwide savings bank operating primarily over the Internet. We offer loans and deposits in all 50 states to our customers directly through our websites, including www.BankofInternet.com, www.BofI.com, and www.Apartmentbank.com. We are a unitary
savings and loan holding company and, along with Bank of Internet USA, are subject to primary federal regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision, or OTS.

Using online applications on our websites, our customers apply for deposit products, including time deposits, interest-bearing demand accounts (including interest-bearing checking accounts) and savings
accounts (including money market savings accounts). We originate small- to medium-size multifamily and single-family mortgage loans and secured consumer loans, primarily home equity and vehicle loans. More recently, we increased our efforts to
purchase single family and multifamily loans. We also purchase mortgage-backed securities. We manage our cash and cash equivalents based upon our need for liquidity, and we seek to minimize the assets we hold as cash and cash equivalents by
investing our excess liquidity in higher yielding assets such as mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities.

Critical Accounting
Policies

Our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various factors and circumstances. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances.
However, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions that could have a material effect on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and our results of operations for the reporting
periods.

Our significant accounting policies and practices are described in greater detail in Note 1 to our June 30,
2009 audited consolidated financial statements and under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  Critical Accounting Policies contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  Comparison of the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008

For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had net income of $3,708,000
compared to a net loss of $1,817,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Net income attributable to common stock holders was $3,535,000 or $0.41 per diluted share compared to a net loss of $1,988,000 or $0.24 per diluted share for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Other key comparisons between our operating results
for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are:



Net interest income increased $4,753,000 in the 2009 quarter due to an 11.1% increase in average earning assets primarily from loan pool purchases and
mortgage-backed securities. In addition, our net interest margin increased 120 basis points in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008, as the earning rates on loans and securities increased while the rates paid
on deposits and borrowings decreased.



The loan loss provision was $2,000,000 for the September 30, 2009 quarter compared to $505,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The
increased loan loss provision was due primarily to the general declines in housing values and increased charge-offs on RV loans.



The loss in non-interest income decreased $6,915,000 for the September 30, 2009 quarter compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
During the September 30, 2009 quarter, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) expense of $1,369,000, a fair value loss to our trading securities of $142,000 and had $332,000 in gain on sale of single family first mortgages. A loss
of $7,902,000 was recorded on the sale of Fannie Mae preferred stock in the September 30, 2008 quarter.

Excluding the impact of a one-time loss in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 on our investment in Fannie Mae preferred stock, our earnings this quarter increased $815,000 or 28.2% compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008. As a result of the U.S. Governments decision to place Fannie Mae in conservatorship and to suspend dividends to shareholders, our earnings were reduced by an after tax loss of $4,710,000 due to the sale of our
investment in Fannie Mae preferred stock. On September 7, 2008, the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that the FHFA was putting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under conservatorship and giving
management control to their regulator, the FHFA. The U.S. Treasury also announced that dividends on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac common and preferred stock were eliminated. As a result of the governments decision, we sold our investment in
Fannie Mae Preferred stock on September 8, 2008 at a pre-tax loss of $7,902,000. Excluding the Fannie Mae loss, earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 would have been $2,893,000.

Net Interest Income

Net
interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $12.6 million, a 60.8% increase compared to net interest income of $7.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.

Total interest and dividend income during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased 13.6% to $21.8 million, compared to $19.2
million during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The increase in interest and dividend income for the quarter was attributable primarily to growth in average earning assets from purchases of investment securities and loans. The average
balance of investment securities (primarily mortgage-backed securities) increased 20.8% when compared for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The increase in interest income was also the result of our higher rates earned
on new loans originated and purchased, amortization of discounts on purchases of loan pools as well as higher rates on new non-agency mortgage-backed securities purchased. The loan portfolio yield for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
increased 50 basis points and the investment security portfolio yield increased 24 basis points. The net growth in average earning assets for the three-month period was funded largely by increased demand and savings accounts and increased short-term
borrowings. Total interest expense decreased 18.9% to $9.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared with $11.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The average funding rate decreased by 114 basis points while
the average interest-bearing liabilities incurred an 11.7% growth in average balances. Contributing to the decrease in the average funding rate were decreases in the average rates for time deposits of 78 basis points, decreases in the average
funding rates of demand and savings accounts of 154 basis points offset by an increase in the average rates of FHLB advances of 50 basis points when compared for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Net interest margin, defined as net
interest income divided by average earning assets, increased by 120 basis points to 3.88% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared with 2.68% for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.

The improvement in the net interest margin has resulted from specific actions we have taken to manage our assets and liabilities, as well as
general changes in the U.S. Treasury yield curve and loan risk premiums. Our specific actions include selling our agency mortgage-backed securities and replacing them with higher yielding loans and non-agency mortgage backed securities. In addition,
we have lowered our deposit offering rates in an effort to take advantage of lower borrowing rates tied to U.S. Treasury rates. Since March of 2008, the Federal Reserve has reduced the short-term Fed funds rate by 200 basis points, to a range of
0.00 to 0.25% as of September 30, 2009. The rate cuts have reduced and will likely continue to reduce our cost of funding through lower term deposit rates and will reduce our interest income on certain loans and securities, transitioning from a
fixed rate to and adjustable rate.

The following table presents information regarding (i) average balances; (ii) the total amount of interest income from
interest-earning assets and the weighted average yields on such assets; (iii) the total amount of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the weighted average rates paid on such liabilities; (iv) net interest income;
(v) interest rate spread; and (vi) net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

2009

2008

AverageBalance

InterestIncome /Expense

RatesEarned /Paid 1

AverageBalance

InterestIncome /Expense

RatesEarned /Paid 1

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets

Loans 2 3

$

612,955

$

10,350

6.75

%

$

625,814

$

9,780

6.25

%

Federal funds sold

38,993

16

0.16

%

2,426

12

1.98

%

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions

283



0.00

%

1,111

12

4.32

%

Investment securities 3 4

623,225

11,372

7.30

%

515,767

9,102

7.06

%

Stock of FHLB, at cost

18,848

39

0.83

%

19,535

271

5.55

%

Total interest-earning assets

1,294,304

21,777

6.73

%

1,164,653

19,177

6.59

%

Non-interest earning assets

27,713

17,794

Total assets

$

1,322,017

$

1,182,447

Liabilities and Stockholders Equity

Interest-bearing demand and savings

$

360,850

$

1,552

1.72

%

$

133,418

$

1,087

3.26

%

Time deposits

378,099

3,879

4.10

%

429,203

5,240

4.88

%

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

130,000

1,436

4.42

%

130,000

1,416

4.36

%

Advances from FHLB

215,682

2,224

4.12

%

392,928

3,554

3.62

%

Other borrowings

133,198

121

0.36

%

5,156

68

5.28

%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

1,217,829

9,212

3.03

%

1,090,705

11,365

4.17

%

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits

4,560

4,004

Other interest-free liabilities

7,609

6,949

Stockholders' equity

92,019

80,789

Total liabilities and stockholders equity

$

1,322,017

$

1,182,447

Net interest income

$

12,565

$

7,812

Net interest spread 5

3.71

%

2.42

%

Net interest margin 6

3.88

%

2.68

%

1

Annualized

2

Loans include loans held for sale, loan premiums and unearned fees.

3

Interest income includes reductions for amortization of loan and investment securities premiums and earnings from accretion of discounts and loan fees.
Loan fee income is not significant. The rate earned on loans does not include loan prepayment penalty income, which is classified as non-interest income.

4

All investments are taxable.

5

Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities.

6

Net interest margin represents net interest income annualized as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Changes in net interest income are a function of changes in rates and volumes of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. The following table presents information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. The total change for each category of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability is segmented into
the change attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), the change attributable to variations in interest rates (changes in rates multiplied by old volume) and the change attributable to changes in rate/volume
(change in rate multiplied by the change in volume):

For the Three Months Ended September 30,2009 vs 2008

Increase (decrease) due to

Volume

Rate

Rate /Volume

Total netIncrease(Decrease)

(Dollars in Thousands)

Increase / (decrease) in interest income:

Loans

$

(201

)

$

789

$

(18

)

$

570

Federal funds sold

181

(11

)

(166

)

4

Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions

(9

)

(12

)

9

(12

)

Investment securities

1,897

308

65

2,270

Stock of the FHLB

(10

)

(231

)

9

(232

)

$

1,858

$

843

$

(101

)

$

2,600

Increase / (decrease) in interest expense:

Interest-bearing demand and savings

$

1,854

$

(514

)

$

(875

)

$

465

Time deposits

(623

)

(833

)

95

(1,361

)

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase



19

1

20

Advances from FHLB

(1,604

)

496

(222

)

(1,330

)

Other borrowings

1,690

(63

)

(1,574

)

53

$

1,317

$

(895

)

$

(2,575

)

$

(2,153

)

Provision for Loan Losses

The loan loss provision was $2,000,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared to $505,000 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The increased provision for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 was the result of the nationwide decline in housing values and higher unemployment which has negatively impacted consumer credit, continued changes in
portfolio mix and higher estimated losses from our recreational vehicle portfolio and real estate loan portfolios. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management
based on the factors discussed under the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this report.

The following table sets forth information regarding our non-interest income for the periods shown:

For the Three MonthsEnded September 30,

2009

2008

(Dollars in thousands)

Realized gain (loss) on securities:

Sale of FNMA preferred stock

$



$

(7,902

)

Sale of mortgage-backed securities



6

Total realized gain (loss) on securities



(7,896

)

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:

Total impairment losses

(1,390

)



Loss recognized in other comprehensive earnings

21



Net impairment loss recognized in earnings

(1,369

)



Fair value loss on trading securities

(142

)

(177

)

Total unrealized loss on securities

(1,511

)

(177

)

Prepayment penalty fee income

47

42

Mortgage banking income

332

1

Banking service fees and other income

123

106

Total non-interest income (loss)

$

(1,009

)

$

(7,924

)

The $1.0 million loss in non-interest income for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 was the result of an OTTI loss of $1.4 million, and a fair value loss on CDOs of $142,000 partially offset by a gain of $332,000 in 1st mortgages originated for sale and other fees. The loss for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was
primarily the result of selling $9.1 million in FNMA preferred stock resulting in a loss of $7.9 million and recording a fair value adjustment to our trading securities for a loss of $177,000.

Efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense as a percentage of the aggregate of net interest income and noninterest income. For the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, without the loss of $7.902 million in noninterest income due to the loss on sale of FNMA preferred stock, the efficiency ratio would have been 31.8%

Non-interest expense, which is comprised primarily of compensation, data processing and internet expenses, occupancy and other operating
expenses, was $3.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, up from $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

Total salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation increased $145,000 to $1,408,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1,263,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
Excluding the one-time charges of $352,000 recorded in 2008 related to the change in employment agreement for the Banks president, total compensation increased $497,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, primarily related to
staffing changes in the lending business and a 3.7% average increase to salaries and wages. The Banks staff increased from 47 to 61 full-time equivalents between September 30, 2008 and 2009.

Professional services, which include accounting and legal fees, increased $90,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 over the
prior year period. The increase in professional services for the period ended September 30, 2009 was primarily due to contract underwriters used in connection with loan pool purchases, set-up of first mortgage and multifamily loan products and
legal and ratings fees due to the re-securitization of our non-agency mortgage backed securities.

Advertising and promotional expense decreased $9,000 for the three-month periods ending September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in internet
advertising and lead acquisitions for 1st mortgage home
loans offset by a decrease for lead acquisitions for our home equity loan origination program.

Data processing and internet
expense increased $12,000 for the three-month period ending September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of customer accounts and fees for special
enhancements to the Banks core processing system.

The cost of our FDIC and OTS standard regulatory charges increased
$230,000 for the three-month period ending September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. This was due to higher average deposit balances and higher assessment rates for the period ended September 30, 2009.
As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to pay deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC. Because the FDICs deposit insurance fund fell below prescribed levels in 2008, the FDIC has announced increased premiums for all insured
depository institutions, including the Bank, in order to begin recapitalizing the fund. Insurance assessments range from 0.07% to 0.78% of assessable base, depending on an institution's risk classification and other factors. This change has resulted
in increased deposit insurance expense for the Bank. FDIC rules authorize the FDIC to impose an additional emergency assessment of up to 10 basis points after June 30, 2009, if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit
insurance, and the FDIC has proposed that banks prepay their premiums in December 2009 for the next nine quarters. These changes will result in increased deposit insurance expense for the Bank in the period of enactment.

Our
total assets increased $21.9 million, or 1.7%, to $1,324.1 million, as of September 30, 2009, up from $1,302.2 million at June 30, 2009. The increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase of $41.4 million in investment
securities offset by a decrease of $20.3 million in loans held for investment. Total liabilities increased a total of $17.8 million, primarily due to an increase in deposits of $115.0 million offset with a decrease in borrowings of $60.0 million
from the Federal Reserve Discount Window and a decrease of $37.0 million in borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco.

Loans

Net loans held for investment decreased to $595.1 million at September 30, 2009 from $615.5 million
at June 30, 2009. The decrease in the loan portfolio was due to loan repayments of $29.0 million, transfers to foreclosed real estate of $1.0 million and a net increase in the allowance of $516,000 during the three months ended
September 30, 2009.

The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

September 30, 2009

June 30, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount

Percent

Amount

Percent

Residential real estate loans:

Single family (one to four units)

$

160,117

26.3

%

$

165,405

26.3

%

Home equity

29,214

4.8

%

32,345

5.1

%

Multifamily (five units or more)

315,612

52.0

%

326,938

52.0

%

Commercial real estate and land loans

29,477

4.8

%

30,002

4.8

%

ConsumerRecreational vehicle

46,438

7.6

%

50,056

8.0

%

Other

27,194

4.5

%

23,872

3.8

%

Total loans held for investment

$

608,052

100.0

%

$

628,618

100.0

%

Allowance for loan losses

(5,270

)

(4,754

)

Unamortized premiums/discounts, net of deferred loan fees

(7,642

)

(8,401

)

Net loans held for investment

$

595,140

$

615,463

The Bank originates and purchases mortgage loans with terms that may include
repayments that are less than the repayments for fully amortizing loans, including interest only loans, option adjustable-rate mortgages, and other loan types that permit payments that may be smaller than interest accruals. Through
September 30, 2009, the net amount of deferred interest on these loan types was not material to the financial position or operating results of the Company.

Nonperforming loans are comprised of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more and on nonaccrual status and troubled debt restructured loans. Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans plus other foreclosed real estate or
assets owned, net. At September 30, 2009, our nonperforming loans totaled $4,600,000, or 0.76% of total gross loans and our total nonperforming assets totaled $9,632,000, or 0.73% of total assets.

Nonperforming loans and foreclosed assets or nonperforming assets consisted of the following as of the dates indicated:

September 30,2009

June 30,2009

(Dollars in thousands)

Nonperforming assets:

Nonaccrual loans:

Loans secured by real estate:

Single family

$

3,666

$

1,502

Home equity loans

33

9

Multifamily

900

1,171

Commercial





Total nonaccrual loans secured by real estate

4,599

2,682

RV/Auto



158

Other

1



Total nonperforming loans

4,600

2,840

Foreclosed real estate

4,168

5,334

Repossessedvehicles

864

317

Total nonperforming assets

$

9,632

$

8,491

Total nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans

0.76

%

0.45

%

Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets

0.73

%

0.65

%

Total nonperforming assets increased a net $1,141,000 between June 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2009. The majority of the increase was the result of four nonperforming single family loans totaling $2,164,000 partially offset by the sale of one foreclosed multifamily property in Miami, Florida. Nonperforming and repossessed
RV loans increased from $475,000 at June 30, 2009 to $864,000 at September 30, 2009. The increased level of nonperforming real estate loans reflects the nationwide downturn in real estate values. The increased level of nonperforming RV
loans reflects the current nationwide recession. If real estate values continue to decline and consumer job losses continue to increase, we are likely to experience continued growth of our nonperforming assets.

At September 30, 2009, the carrying value of impaired loans is net of write-offs of
$779,000 and there are no specific allowance allocations. The average carrying value of impaired loans was $3,720,000 and $3,958,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The interest income recognized during the
periods of impairment is insignificant for those loans impaired at September 30, 2009 or 2008. Loans past due 90 days or more which were still accruing interest were $3,225,000 at September 30, 2009 and $4,715,000 at June 30, 2009.
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest are certain single family mortgages from which we both received advanced payments from the loan servicing company and we determined that such loans are not impaired based upon a current fair value
analysis of the collateral.

The Bank has no loans which are considered a troubled debt restructuring at September 30,
2009. A troubled debt restructuring is a performing loan with permanent modifications of principal and interest payments or an extension of maturity dates. From time-to-time the Bank has made temporary modifications to a borrowers loan terms,
such as a temporary reduction in a borrowers interest rate to match lower market interest rates or other temporary changes in terms. At September 30, 2009, the Bank had mortgage loans and RV loans with outstanding balances totaling
$2,884,000 and $3,080,000, respectively, with borrowers currently making monthly payments under a temporary loan modification.

Allowance for Loan Losses. We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated and known risks in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance
is reviewed quarterly, our management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2009, future additions to the allowance will be
subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio.

The assessment of
the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, change in volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history.

We provide general loan loss reserves for our RV and auto loans based upon the borrower credit score at the time of
origination and our loss experience to date. We provide general loan loss reserves for our mortgage loans based upon the size and type of the mortgage loan and the loan-to-value ratio. For the period ended September 30, 2009, we have
experienced increased charge-offs of RV loans due to the nationwide recession. Our Banks portfolio of RV loans is expected to decrease in the future as the Bank no longer originates RV loans. The amount of charge-offs in this quarter was
upwardly influenced by the size of the loan amount subject to default and repossession which was approximately 93% higher than the loan average in our portfolio. We believe that the number of borrower defaults experienced this quarter will continue
in subsequent quarters, however the amount of charge-offs should be more reflective of the average loan size, approximately 33% lower. Given the uncertainties surrounding a further downturn in our economy, we may experience a larger increase in the
relative amount of charge-offs and may be required to increase our loan loss provisions in the future to provide a larger loss allowance for one or more of our loan types.

The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three
months ended September 30, 2009:

SingleFamily

HomeEquity

Multi-family

CommercialReal Estateand Land

RecreationalVehicles andAutos

Other

Total

(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at July 1, 2009

$

1,113

$

280

$

1,680

$

179

$

1,475

$

27

$

4,754

Provision for loan loss

16

22

163

(2

)

1,795

6

2,000

Charge-offs

(13

)

(47

)

(270

)



(1,154

)



(1,484

)

Recoveries















Balance at Sept. 30, 2009

$

1,116

$

255

$

1,573

$

177

$

2,116

$

33

$

5,270

The following table reflects managements allocation of the allowance for loan
losses by loan category and the ratio of each loan category to total loans as of the dates indicated:

September 30, 2009

June 30, 2009

AmountofAllowance

Allocationas a % ofAllowance

AmountofAllowance

Allocation asa %of Allowance

(Dollars in thousands)

Single family

$

1,116

21.17

%

$

1,113

23.41

%

Home equity

255

4.84

%

280

5.89

%

Multifamily

1,573

29.85

%

1,680

35.34

%

Commercial real estate and land

177

3.36

%

179

3.76

%

Consumer - Recreational vehicles

2,116

40.15

%

1,475

31.03

%

Other

33

0.63

%

27

0.57

%

Total

$

5,270

100.00

%

$

4,754

100.00

%

The loan loss provision was $2,000,000 and $505,000 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increased provisions for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 were the result of the nationwide decline in housing values and higher unemployment which has negatively impacted consumer credit,
continued changes in portfolio mix and higher estimated losses from our recreational vehicle portfolio and real estate loan portfolios.

Investment Securities

Total investment securities were $663.5 million as of September 30, 2009, compared
with $622.2 million at June 30, 2009. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we purchased $23.7 million of mortgage-backed securities available for sale, and received principal repayments of approximately $15.2 million. We also
purchased $25.0 million of mortgage-backed securities and $20.8 million in FNMA bonds held to maturity, and received principal repayments of approximately $18.1 million and the balance of the change is equal to accretion and other activities.

We currently classify agency mortgage-backed and debt securities as held to maturity or available for sale at the time of purchase based upon small issue size and based on issue features, such as
callable terms.

Deposits

Deposits increased a net $115.0 million, or 17.7%, to $763.5 million at September 30, 2009, from $648.5 million at June 30, 2009. Our deposit gain composition was a 59.0% increase in interest
bearing demand and savings accounts offset with a 9.1% decrease in time deposit accounts. Our increase in interest bearing demand and savings accounts was the result of increased promotion and competitive pricing during the first three months of the
fiscal year.

The following table sets forth the composition of the deposit portfolio as of the dates
indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)

September 30, 2009

June 30, 2009

Amount

Rate*

Amount

Rate*

Non-interest bearing

$

3,489

0.00

%

$

3,509

0.00

%

Interest bearing:

Demand

57,308

2.45

%

59,151

1.22

%

Savings

345,263

1.06

%

192,781

1.94

%

Time deposits:

Under $100,000

170,787

4.21

%

191,021

4.39

%

$100,000 or more

186,666

3.79

%

202,062

3.85

%

Total time deposits

357,453

3.99

%

393,083

4.11

%

Total interest bearing

760,024

2.80

%

645,015

3.20

%

Total deposits

$

763,513

2.79

%

$

648,524

3.18

%

*

Based on weighted-average stated interest rates at end of period.

The following table sets forth the number of deposit accounts by type as of the date indicated:

September 30,2009

June 30,2009

September 30,2008

Checking and savings accounts

16,429

10,685

9,617

Time deposits

9,544

12,757

14,203

Total number of deposit accounts

25,973

23,442

23,820

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Since November 2006, we have sold securities under various agreements to repurchase for total proceeds of $130.0 million. The repurchase
agreements bear interest rates between 3.24% and 4.75% and scheduled maturities between January 2012 and December 2017. Under these agreements, we may be required to repay the $130.0 million and repurchase our securities before the scheduled
maturity if the issuer requests repayment on scheduled quarterly call dates. The weighted-average remaining contractual maturity period is 5.11 years and the weighted average remaining period before such repurchase agreements could be called is 0.59
years.

FHLB Advances

We regularly use FHLB advances to manage our interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, manage our liquidity position. Generally, FHLB advances with terms between three and ten years have been used to fund the purchase of single family and
multifamily mortgages and to provide us with interest rate risk protection should rates rise. At September 30, 2009, a total of $52.0 million of FHLB advances include agreements that allow the FHLB, at its option, to put the advances back to us
after specified dates. The weighted-average remaining contractual maturity period of the $52.0 million in advances is 2.90 years and the weighted average remaining period before such advances could be put to us is 0.67 years.

Stockholders Equity

Stockholders equity increased $4.1 million to $93.0 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $88.9 million at June 30, 2009. The increase was the result of our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2009
of $3.7 million, a $0.2 million unrealized gain from our available for sale securities and $.3 million from the conversion and exercise of stock options.

LIQUIDITY

During the three months ended
September 30, 2009, we had net cash outflows from operating activities of $4.0 million compared to inflows of $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Net operating cash outflows for the period ended in 2009 were
primarily due to the add-back of non-cash adjustments of loan accretion.

Net cash outflows from investing activities totaled $14.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 while inflows totaled $6.8 million for the same period in 2008. This was primarily due to increased securities purchased offset by decreased loan pool purchases in the period versus the same period in the prior year.

Our net cash provided by financing activities totaled $18.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 while
cash used in financing activities totaled $18.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Net cash provided by financing activities increased primarily from the increase in deposits off set by the repayment of borrowings for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Bank could borrow up to 40.0% of its total assets from the FHLB. Borrowings are collateralized by the pledge of
certain mortgage loans and investment securities to the FHLB. At September 30, 2009, the Company had $119.7 million available immediately and an additional $178.5 million available with additional collateral. At September 30, 2009, we also
had a $10.0 million unsecured federal funds purchase line with a bank under which no borrowings were outstanding.

The Bank has
the ability to borrow short-term from the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window. At September 30, 2009 the amount outstanding was $100.0 million and the amount available for additional borrowings from this source were $248.4 million. These
borrowings are collateralized by consumer loans, and mortgage-backed securities.

In an effort to expand our Banks
liquidity options, we have issued brokered deposits, with $65.7 million outstanding at September 30, 2009. We believe our liquidity sources to be stable and adequate for our anticipated needs and contingencies. We believe we have the ability to
increase our level of deposits and borrowings to address our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

At September 30, 2009, we had
commitments to originate or purchase loans and investment securities of $28.1 million, and $11.9 million in commitments to sell loans. Time deposits due within one year of September 30, 2009 totaled $207.2 million. We believe the large
percentage of time deposits that mature within one year reflects customers hesitancy to invest their funds long term. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we may be required to seek other sources of funds, including other time
deposits and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on deposits and borrowings than we currently pay on time deposits maturing within one year. We believe, however, based on past experience, a significant
portion of our time deposits will remain with us. We believe we have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting interest rates offered.

The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009:

Total

Payments Due by Period1

Less ThanOne Year

One ToThree Years

Three ToFive Years

More ThanFive Years

(Dollars in thousands)

Long-term debt obligations 2

$

895,736

$

416,971

$

239,554

$

139,831

$

99,380

Operating lease obligations 3

987

336

651





Total

$

896,723

$

417,307

$

240,205

$

139,831

$

99,380

1

Our contractual obligations include long-term debt, time deposits and operating leases as shown. We had no capitalized leases or material commitments
for capital expenditures at September 30, 2009.

2

Amounts include principal and interest due to recipient.

3

Payments are for a lease of real property.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS

Bank of
Internet USA is subject to various regulatory capital requirements set by the federal banking agencies. Failure by our Bank to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, our Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of our Banks assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our Banks capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about
components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation require our Bank to maintain certain minimum
capital amounts and ratios. Regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision requires our Bank to maintain minimum ratios of tangible capital to tangible assets of 1.5%, core capital to tangible assets of 4.0% and total risk-based capital to
risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. At September 30, 2009, our Bank met all the capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. At September 30, 2009, our Bank was well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be well capitalized, our Bank must maintain minimum leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 5.0%, 6.0% and 10.0%, respectively. No conditions or events have occurred since that
date that management believes would materially adversely change the Banks capital classification. From time to time, we may need to raise additional capital to support our Banks further growth and to maintain its well
capitalized status.

The Banks capital amounts, capital ratios and capital requirements at September 30, 2009
were as follows:

Actual

For Capital AdequacyPurposes

To be Well CapitalizedUnder Promt Correctiveaction Regulations

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

(Dollars in thousands)

Tier 1 leverage (core) capital to adjusted tangible assets

$

94,871

7.20

%

$

52,673

4.00

%

$

65,842

5.00

%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

94,871

15.51

%

N/A

N/A

36,708

6.00

%

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

100,141

16.37

%

48,944

8.00

%

61,180

10.00

%

Tangible capital (to tangible assets)

94,871

7.20

%

19,752

1.50

%

N/A

N/A

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We measure interest rate sensitivity as the difference between amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities that mature or contractually re-price within a given period of time. The difference, or the interest rate sensitivity gap, provides an indication of the extent to which an institutions interest rate spread will be affected by
changes in interest rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities and negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the
amount of interest rate sensitive assets. In a rising interest rate environment, an institution with a positive gap would be in a better position than an institution with a negative gap to invest in higher yielding assets or to have its asset yields
adjusted upward, which would result in the yield on its assets to increase at a faster pace than the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities. During a period of falling interest rates, however, an institution with a positive gap would tend to have
its assets reprice at a faster rate than one with a negative gap, which would tend to reduce the growth in its net interest income. The following table sets forth the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities at September 30,
2009:

Comprised of U.S. government securities and mortgage-backed securities, which are classified as held to maturity, available for sale and trading. The
table reflects contractual re-pricing dates and does not estimate prepayments or calls.

2

The table reflects either contractual re-pricing dates or maturities.

3

The table assumes that the principal balances for demand deposit and savings accounts will re-price in the first year.

4

The table reflects either contractual re-pricing dates or maturities and does not estimate prepayments or puts.

Although gap analysis is a useful measurement device available to management in determining the existence of interest rate
exposure, its static focus as of a particular date makes it necessary to utilize other techniques in measuring exposure to changes in interest rates. For example, gap analysis is limited in its ability to predict trends in future earnings and makes
no assumptions about changes in prepayment tendencies, deposit or loan maturity preferences or repricing time lags that may occur in response to a change in the interest rate environment.

We attempt to measure the effect market interest rate changes will have on the net present
value of assets and liabilities, which is defined as market value of equity. We analyze the market value of equity sensitivity to an immediate parallel and sustained shift in interest rates derived from the current treasury and LIBOR yield curves.
For rising interest rate scenarios, the base market interest rate forecast was increased by 100, 200 and 300 basis points. For the falling interest rate scenarios, we used a 100 basis points decrease due to limitations inherent in the current rate
environment. The following table indicates the sensitivity of market value of equity to the interest rate movement described above at September 30, 2009:

NetPresent Value(in thousands)

PercentageChangefromBase

NetPresentValue as aPercentageof Assets

Up 300 basis points

$

97,578

-2.80

%

7.48

%

Up 200 basis points

104,232

3.87

%

7.85

%

Up 100 basis points

107,943

7.57

%

8.01

%

Base

100,351



7.39

%

Down 100 basis points

107,475

7.10

%

7.75

%

The computation of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes is
based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of interest rates, asset prepayments, runoffs in deposits and changes in repricing levels of deposits to general market rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.
Furthermore, these computations do not take into account any actions that we may undertake in response to future changes in interest rates.

ITEM 3:

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding market risks in our portfolio, see, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

ITEM 4:

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Companys management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified by the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.

There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above that occurred during the quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

The Companys size dictates that it conducts business with a minimal number of
financial and administrative employees, which inherently results in a lack of documented controls and segregation of duties within the Company. Management will continue to evaluate the employees involved and the controls procedures in place, the
risks associated with such lack of segregation and whether the potential benefits of adding employees to clearly segregate duties justifies the expense associated with such added personnel. In addition, management is aware that many of the internal
controls that are in place at the Company are undocumented controls.

The Company believes that a control system, no matter
how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control are met and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have
been detected.

We are
not involved in any material legal proceedings. From time to time we may be a party to a claim or litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the origination and servicing of loans,
and other issues related to the business of the Bank.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

We face a
variety of risks that are inherent in our business and our industry. The following are some of the more significant factors that could affect our business and our results of operations:



Recent negative developments in the financial institutions industry and credit markets, as well as the economy in general, may continue to adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The recent negative events in the housing market,
including significant and continuing home price reductions coupled with the upward trends in delinquencies and foreclosures, have resulted and will likely continue to result in poor performance of mortgage and construction loans and in significant
asset write-downs by many financial institutions. This has caused and will likely continue to cause many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to seek government
assistance or bankruptcy protection. Bank failures and liquidations or sales by the FDIC as receiver have also increased.

Reduced availability of commercial credit and increasing unemployment have further contributed to deteriorating credit performance of commercial and consumer loans, resulting in additional write-downs. Financial market and economic
instability has caused many lenders and institutional investors to severely restrict their lending to customers and to each other. This market turmoil and credit tightening has exacerbated commercial and consumer deficiencies, the lack of consumer
confidence, market volatility and widespread reduction in general business activity. Financial institutions also have experienced decreased access to deposits and borrowings. As of September 30, 2009, we had $207.2 million of time deposits maturing
within one year, which is a significant portion of our total time deposits and reflects our customers hesitancy to invest their funds long term. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us upon maturity, we may be required to seek other
sources of funds.

These negative economic trends and developments are being experienced on national and international levels,
as well as within the State of California where the Companys business is concentrated. It is difficult to predict how long these economic conditions will exist, which of our markets and loan products will ultimately be most affected, and
whether our actions will effectively mitigate these external factors. The current economic pressure on consumers and businesses and the lack of confidence in the financial markets has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. For example, we have recently experienced an increase in our nonperforming assets and if real estate values continue to decline and consumer job losses continue to increase, we
are likely to experience continued growth in nonperforming assets.

We do not believe these conditions are likely to improve in
the near future. As a result of the challenges presented by these general economic and industry conditions, we face the following risks:



The number of our borrowers unable to make timely repayments of their loans, the potential increase in the volume of problem assets and foreclosures
and/or decreases in the value of real estate collateral securing the payment of such loans and/or decreases in the demand for our products and services could continue to rise, resulting in additional credit losses, which could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results.



Potentially increased regulation of our industry, including heightened legal standards and regulatory requirements, as well as expectations imposed in
connection with recent and proposed legislation. Compliance with such additional regulation will likely increase our operating costs and may limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.



The process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments, including forecasts of
economic conditions and how these economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. The level of uncertainty concerning economic conditions may adversely affect the accuracy of our estimates which may, in turn,
impact the reliability of the process.



Further disruptions in the capital markets or other events, which may result in an inability to borrow on favorable terms or at all from other
financial institutions.

Further increases in FDIC insurance premiums, due to the increasing number of failed institutions, which have significantly depleted the Deposit
Insurance Fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits.



Recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to address difficult market and economic conditions may not stabilize the U.S. banking system.



We are subject to changing government laws and regulations, which could adversely affect our operations.



The U.S. governments monetary policies or changes in those policies could have a major effect on our operating results, and we cannot predict
what those policies will be or any changes in such policies or the effect of such policies on us.



Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented.



The actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions could affect our ability to engage in routine funding transactions.



Declines in the value of our securities may negatively affect earnings.



Our results of operations could vary as a result of the methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies.



We may elect to seek additional capital but it may not be available when it is needed and limit our ability to execute our strategic plan.



Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our income.



Many of our mortgage and consumer loans, particularly recreational vehicle loans and home equity loans are generally unseasoned, and defaults on such
loans would harm our business.

We purchase and originate loans in bulk or pools. We may experience lower yields or losses on loans because the assumptions we use may not
always prove correct.



Our success depends in large part on the continuing efforts of a few individuals. If we are unable to retain these personnel or attract, hire and
retain others to oversee and manage our company, our business could suffer.



We have risks of systems failure and security risks, including hacking and identity theft.

These risks are described in more detail under Risk Factors in Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2009. We encourage you to read these risk factors in their entirety. Other factors may also exist that we cannot anticipate or that we currently do not consider being significant based on information that is currently available.

The table below sets forth information regarding the Companys common stock repurchase plans. Purchases made relate to the stock repurchase plan of 414,991 shares that was originally approved by the
Companys Board of Directors on July 5, 2005 plus an additional 500,000 shares approved on November 20, 2008. Stock repurchased under this plan will be held as Treasury shares.

Total numberof sharespurchased

Average pricepaid per share

Maximumnumber ofshares that mayyet be purchasedunder the
Plans

Shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs:

Balance at July 1, 2009 1

595,700

$

5.72

319,291

Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programsSeptember 30, 2009

595,700

$

5.72

319,291

Shares purchased as part of a net-settlement of employees restricted stock units: