A 1v1 mode for matchmaking-Free for all is too chaotic for me and I don't want to be teamed up with someone I don't know. I find 1v1 to be a lot more fun and rewarding.

A spectator/replay-viewer mode-learning how everything works and how I'm supposed to react to things is made a lot harder without the ability to watch my matches and study them. It's usually not a big deal, but in this game I'll need it.

A recording option for the training dummy-Much like the replay viewer, a recording option would make learning how to deal with certain characters and testing things out WAY MUCH EASIER.

A 1v1 mode for matchmaking-Free for all is too chaotic for me and I don't want to be teamed up with someone I don't know. I find 1v1 to be a lot more fun and rewarding.

A spectator/replay-viewer mode-learning how everything works and how I'm supposed to react to things is made a lot harder without the ability to watch my matches and study them. It's usually not a big deal, but in this game I'll need it.

A recording option for the training dummy-Much like the replay viewer, a recording option would make learning how to deal with certain characters and testing things out WAY MUCH EASIER.

Click to expand...

First one may happen (they said they are looking into ways to implement it, but I wouldn't expect it in Ranked online, just quick match (since 1v1 just asks to be taken advantage of, no to mention the rage quit factor in ranked)

A replay/recording mode would be extremely unlikely. They said they a replay mode would be near impossible because of their physics engine and how its not perfectly consistent in creating scenarios and would ultimately can;t be done (since replay modes simply save the actions of a fight and replicate them in the fighting engine, rather than actually recording it).

I see. Well, the 1v1 mode is enough to make me happy. Until then, I'll probably just stick to friend invites, it's really hard to learn what each character can do when there's three at once you gotta keep your eye on.

First one may happen (they said they are looking into ways to implement it, but I wouldn't expect it in Ranked online, just quick match (since 1v1 just asks to be taken advantage of, no to mention the rage quit factor in ranked)

A replay/recording mode would be extremely unlikely. They said they a replay mode would be near impossible because of their physics engine and how its not perfectly consistent in creating scenarios and would ultimately can;t be done (since replay modes simply save the actions of a fight and replicate them in the fighting engine, rather than actually recording it).

Click to expand...

Does that mean their physics engine is random or not good for strategies in some way ?

First one may happen (they said they are looking into ways to implement it, but I wouldn't expect it in Ranked online, just quick match (since 1v1 just asks to be taken advantage of, no to mention the rage quit factor in ranked)

A replay/recording mode would be extremely unlikely. They said they a replay mode would be near impossible because of their physics engine and how its not perfectly consistent in creating scenarios and would ultimately can;t be done (since replay modes simply save the actions of a fight and replicate them in the fighting engine, rather than actually recording it).

Click to expand...

Does that mean their physics engine is random or not good for strategies in some way ?

Click to expand...

Not random. Probably just factors in things that will rarely be exactly the same, hard to say what those are since I don't have the details. I just know they said before launch that it wasn't consistent enough to make a replay system feasible (it'd have to be perfectly consistent to make it feasible)

Most studios have most of their permanent staff for preproduction on staff already. We know Superbot has a small team, so this likely means they want to increase the size of their team and the scope of the sequel.

I understand that this is probably a smart move production wise, I just don't really want a sequel 1-2 years from now. 3 would be okay, but honestly I would just be happy with a couple DLC updates. I feel like this game has a lot of potential to grow, but it'll be a pretty slow process.

It'll be kind of like the Dragon Ball tournaments with each round being dukes out between players and every round takes place each Friday night.

Round 1
4 player FFA

Round 2
2 player 1v1

Round 3
2 player 1v1

Click to expand...

id say we have a specific range of maps we can only choose from, but the first map will always be one we see has a fair balance, then loser would be allowed to pick map for next round out of the given choices.

It'll be kind of like the Dragon Ball tournaments with each round being dukes out between players and every round takes place each Friday night.

Round 1
4 player FFA

Round 2
2 player 1v1

Round 3
2 player 1v1

Click to expand...

id say we have a specific range of maps we can only choose from, but the first map will always be one we see has a fair balance, then loser would be allowed to pick map for next round out of the given choices.

maybe two tornys for ffa and 1v1?

Click to expand...

I feel like the first round should just be FFA to knock out a bunch of players (assuming a lot of people participate) then we narrow it down to get some intense match ups. I could maybe invite my wiki friends. I've got a good 20 or so players there.

It'll be kind of like the Dragon Ball tournaments with each round being dukes out between players and every round takes place each Friday night.

Round 1
4 player FFA

Round 2
2 player 1v1

Round 3
2 player 1v1

Click to expand...

id say we have a specific range of maps we can only choose from, but the first map will always be one we see has a fair balance, then loser would be allowed to pick map for next round out of the given choices.

maybe two tornys for ffa and 1v1?

Click to expand...

I feel like the first round should just be FFA to knock out a bunch of players (assuming a lot of people participate) then we narrow it down to get some intense match ups. I could maybe invite my wiki friends. I've got a good 20 or so players there.

Click to expand...

lets see how many ign people will actually play first, i want bragging rights on here if i win (doubt it).

but if theres not a lot of people then why the hell not.

but then at the same time if there are less ign people playing it would be fairly easy to get 1v1's figured out.

id say we have a specific range of maps we can only choose from, but the first map will always be one we see has a fair balance, then loser would be allowed to pick map for next round out of the given choices.

maybe two tornys for ffa and 1v1?

Click to expand...

I feel like the first round should just be FFA to knock out a bunch of players (assuming a lot of people participate) then we narrow it down to get some intense match ups. I could maybe invite my wiki friends. I've got a good 20 or so players there.

Click to expand...

lets see how many ign people will actually play first, i want bragging rights on here if i win (doubt it).

but if theres not a lot of people then why the hell not.

but then at the same time if there are less ign people playing it would be fairly easy to get 1v1's figured out.

Click to expand...

We should plan out the bracket after sign ups. Then we can decide based on how many people enter.