Well Macy's failed in her orientation b/c if that's a policy she should have known that so that's their fault if they didn't stress that when training her.. and if it means that damn much to Macy's then get them their own dressing room.. b/c as far as i'm concerned freakery is high tech now, I wouldn't trust no dck in anybody's dressing room.. these men with serious sex addictions (not transgendered) are out here got high tech camera's strapped to them, drilling holes in bathrooms, suntanning facility's with camera's for their own personal freak show.. i wouldn't put it past them to dress up like a women to get into these dressing rooms based on that policy.. so folks can be whatever they want to be, but if you got a dck you don't need to be in any woman's dressing room, that's what the sign says!!!!!!!!! i'm in b/c i will raise a million $$ worth of hell over it if i find some strange dck in the dressing room that women are suppose to be in..

If her employer had a certain policy on this issue, it was their responsibility to inform her during orientation or have it somewhere in black & white on their employee manual. This attendant sounds prejudice as all get out, but the mere fact that she was never informed of the policy could ultimately let her off the hook.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot create polls in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forum