If that extremely implausible scenario where to unfold, then yes of course, it would be easier to do so if nobody was armed.

Pretty sure Jews thought it was "extremely implausible" to have millions of them shoved into ovens by a dictator as well.

At least you understand the point of the 2nd Amendment, you just don't "agree" with it. That's fine, but changing or modifying the spirit of law should be put in front of the people, not behind closed doors.

As for your other points, most of it is dishonest strawmen, so forgive me if I don't address those points. They aren't worth the time or effort.