Yes it does! Those who missed the games will gladly buy the remaster on PS4. The Last of Us is a god send for the PS4 new adopters.

The only ones who disagree with this move are those selfish gamers who can't grasp the fact that others have the right to enjoy a game they played already. To me, this is okay.

If Sony want's to Remaster the best games of the 2013 lineup, then I welcome that. And, Uncharted collection before U4 comes would be great as well. However, I don't want them to take this too far. Not all the PS3 games should be remastered; only the best ones who came recently.

I understand they both have Naruto names, but how do you know he is talking to himself? Are you a third personality? :P

OT: Business wise, this makes a lot of sense. Especially because those who switched from 360, will now be able to play them. Plus those coming from PS3 that also didn't play them, will have the opportunity to do so. And of course, there will be those that want to play some titles again in their remastered state.

@uth11 where would I put it? My entertainment center and wall outlets are full as it is. No free HDMI ports on my TV, etc."

Inside the HDMI IN port of your Xbox One. That is if you decide to own or own an Xbox One already.

@MegaRay

I agree! PS3 has a massive library, but I don't like how sluggish the console feels overall. Thus why I just rent my games on PSNOW Beta on my PS4. I just rented Catherine and Metal Gear Solid IV a few hours ago. I know a lot of people are discouraged by the PSNOW pricing model, but I feel it suits my needs.

People are going to hate me even more for saying this but I accept that. This is now clue #3 that Sony is not going to be releasing new AAA titles like they have in the past when they were more financially stable. The signs have been there from the beginning.

Clue #1-Sony puts large emphasis on indies at E3 2013 to cover for an otherwise lackluster lineup of games

Clue #2-Yoshida says to expect less AAA games for ps4 and vita. He was specifically responding to a question about a lack of fall games for ps4.

Clue #3-Andre House says "There's an opportunity with some of the remastering or re-imagining from PS3 franchises that will potentially find an audience that hasn't played them in the previous generation because they skipped that generation." Wants to be like Disney, except the difference is Disney goes many many many years before releasing their old classics, like VHS to Blu-Ray type distance.

PS I really wish they would stop acting like no one bought a ps3. Also I have zero issue with remasters of games that either skipped a generation or are 10 years old.

When Sony puts out exclusives like they did on PS3 PS2 and PS1 than you will look really stupid for this comment. Love how you defend a company that's track record with abandoning there consumers and consoles has been consistent for two generations. Come to the light truefan and you will be embraced.

"Clue #2-Yoshida says to expect less AAA games for ps4 and vita. He was specifically responding to a question about a lack of fall games for ps4."

he was talking about the industry as a whole, not specifically about playstation. this has been pointed out countless times already.

"Also I have zero issue with remasters of games that either skipped a generation or are 10 years old."

of course you wouldn't...

(Edit):

"PS I really wish they would stop acting like no one bought a ps3."

Considering that (at least last time I read) 50% of PS4 owners were previous X360 owners, it stands to reason that they likely didn't own a PS3 or play TLOU. And I think what people really wish would stop is you trying to convince people that you own a PS3 or planning on getting a PS4.

These games dont require that many rescources to be rereleased. As such it probably actually means they'll release more. Id they see that they can rerelease games in the following generation and make more money of there investments... so if atm 3/10 exclusives make enough money to finance the rest and have some profit left however if those other 7 can be rereleased at little extra cost and then genwrate more money they will make more games knowing that even ones that break even or make a loss initially might when remastered thabks to word of mouth make money next gen earky in the cycle when other games are still far from release.

"The Best value collection of games in History, only the Orange box is close. All that content for only $60 bucks is a steal. Halo 3 was the most competitive game I ever played, I really hope the ranking system is the same, so i can pick up where I left off. I never got to level 50 because I played with family too much, but they are older now so we should be good. 12:00 am I'm in line unless they offer a preload and digital content deal." #2.7 16d ago by truefan1 | View comment

Fewer people bought a PS3 because they had to buy 3 or 4 360's because of it's crappy hardware, for millions of gamers that left less money to explore other platforms. That's not Sony's fault that's MS fault.

If Sony was worried about their Game sector finances they wouldn't have made a console that wipes the floor with the competition hardware wise, that was more pricey than the competitions. Sony execs always talk about AAA and their importance. You take things they say and twist them to suite your own troll needs.

I don't get the argument that somehow its bad to remaster games when other media like film and music do it all the time. Right now many movies are being remastered in 4k rez and I don't see any outcry over that practice. It's about time for the whiners to get over themselves about remastered games it's a silly argument.

Yeah, it's the same thing. I personally enjoy the odd remaster on console. On PC your games scale with your hardware, but on console we don't have that luxury so it's nice to get upgraded versions of some of your favorite games.