Ross Singer posted:
>The argument for using numeric/letter codes to define the data model is a
>canard, frankly.
Ummm; 130 and 240 are convenient short hand for "uniform title as
main entry" and "uniform title after main entry for filing".
What <bf:term> has been created for these two elements? There seems to
me to be a tension between being short enough for ease, or being long
enough to be explicit. Some of the RDA 336 content terms and $e
relationship terms are far too long. I hope that will not be true of
Bibframe element names.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
7