Sunday, May 29, 2011

Oslo police reveal rape statistics

The following video from Norwegian TV doesn't fit into the standard liberal narrative and so will probably receive no publicity here in Australia. The video shows a policewoman revealing the rape statistics for the city of Oslo from 2006 to 2010. 86 women reported being raped; of the 83 attackers who could be identified all were of non-Western appearance.

This means that there is no rape epidemic amongst the Norwegian population, as feminists would claim. In five years, not a single Norwegian or even Western man was reported by a woman as having committed a rape - in a city of 1,500,000. All the talk about having to change men and mainstream masculinity to stop rape is misdirected.

It means too that the standard liberal assumption that it is white Christian men who are violent oppressors of other people does not fit what is happening here. What we have here are non-Western Muslim men who are committing acts of violence against mostly white Norwegian women. Not surprisingly, the wikipedia article on Oslo has a section talking about white flight from Oslo (see 'demographics').

20 comments:

"In five years, not a single Norwegian or even Western man was reported by a woman as having committed a rape..."

...but that just means (in femispeak) that there is a whole group of women out there who are just too oppressed to report all those horrible white men in.

By abstraction, it also means that white rape victims are quite possibly racist for only reporting non-whites as perpetrators. Perhaps the feminists will come up with a 'representative' lottery to determine who the suspects really are....

I'm surprised more rapes aren't committed by white men. These days it's difficult to find men who are clearly opposed to rape. They are mostly either in favor of it or suspiciously ambivalent. Maybe they are just afraid of being caught.

Anyway, it doesn't matter if immigrants are going on rape sprees. Liberalism and feminism have fixed worldviews that cannot be altered by changing circumstances. Even if every woman in Oslo was raped and then the city was nuked, it would somehow be blamed on white heterosexual Christian men.

These days it's difficult to find men who are clearly opposed to rape.

Really?

Nothing anyone can do about it. The Western world is finished.

Too fatalistic.

Liberalism and feminism have fixed worldviews that cannot be altered by changing circumstances.

Some truth to that. So it's a question of people making a clean break. That's not impossible. Twenty years ago your average leftist man was inevitably a feminist. Now it's more evenly split. Thirty years ago your average worker was a fixed on member of the social democratic/left-liberal party (e.g. the Democratic Party/the Labor Party). Now they are drifting rightward.

Politics changes. We have to be a part of the mix as much as we can, to catch the waves of opportunity as they arise.

A common line is that being for or against rape is only a matter of opinion, and opinions must be respected. Another is that morality is subjective/relative/too hard to figure out, so you cannot say rape is either right or wrong. I encounter these attitudes everywhere I go, and I've already burned bridges with people because of them.

On the bright side, we'll have less cultural incompatibility once Muslims take over.

These rape statistics reminds me of Lara Logan and her deliberate action of not mentioning the word Muslim or Islam even once during her interview with 60Minutes of her agonizing rape experience during the Egyptioan "democratic evolution".

The selection of victims is as important as the ethnicity of the rapists. The rapists are not acting "naturally" or impulsively grabbing at women where they see them most, that is in their own community. They are going after White women. In other words, this is ethnic warfare.

Black on White rape in America shows the same character. It's at a level of intensity compared to Black on Black rape that can't be explained without "hunting behavior". That is, the only plausible explanation for those numbers (and they are very large numbers) is that Black men are going far out of their way to hunt specifically for White women, ignoring potential Black targets on their way.

Of course, our radfem "friends" don't define rape that way, as we can see from this rather laughable attempt to portray all male behavior as rape-supportive: http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/

That's the mentality we're up against, in the feminist academy and in the feminist political interest groups.

I am a conservative from Sweden and I think conservative blogs in the English speaking world has an unfortunate tendency to either choose bad sources or sensationalize much further than is warranted.

Don't get me wrong, there are HUGE problems with immigration and radical feminism in Scandinavia. But when a lot of commentators start stating things that are objectively untrue that's a problem.

In this case the report concerns rapes commited outdoors by an unknown assailant. There's still plenty of actual Norwegian men being accused of rape, and surely some of them are guilty.

Similiarly much is made of the rape statistics in Sweden. But most of the rise of rape stats in Sweden is due to radical feminists working to expand the legal definition of rape far outside what is considered rape in the rest of the civilized world. The case of Julian Assange is a pretty good example of this.

So yes, immigrants, and particularly muslims, rape more than Scandinavians. But please do not resort to hyperbole.

Annoyingly enough these sort of misinformed claims in English speaking media are frequently used as sources in the informal Swedish debate. Which gives the multicultural apologists and feminists plenty of strawmen to easily demolish.

Thanks for your comment. I drew the information from the statements of a police official on Norwegian TV. I don't consider this a bad source. I take your point that the 86 rapes were those committed outdoors by unknown assailants - this wasn't mentioned in the news report so I was unaware of this. I might have phrased the post a little differently had I known.

But the main point stands. There were no native Norwegian men who were reported as having committed a rape on an unknown woman as compared to 83 non-Western men who did. It is still a very striking statistic.

"What we have here are non-Western Muslim men who are committing acts of violence against mostly white Norwegian women. "When and where does it say that they are all Muslims?Take two black men from different African countries, one christian, one muslim, both with beards and wearing business casuals, and then, based entirely on their looks, tell me which one is the "non-western looking" one.While your at it, pick out (based entirely on looks) an iranian muslim from a crowd of dark skinned armenian christians, or darker skinned slavic russians for that matter.