How has Kam been playing. I was surprised to see no INT's or FF's on the year...

Certainly not having the same impact he was having last season. He still leads all safeties in tackles in the league IIRC, but he's not making the same splash plays he was in 2011._________________ '
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez

We can use this thread to keep track of which players are deserving of going to Hawaii.

As of Week 7:

CB Brandon Browner = also obvious

Hmmm........ You say Browner is an obvious pro bowler, but you insisted that we trade him during our board mock draft. What gives? _________________"People say you should always do the right thing, but sometimes there is no right thing. And then, you just have to pick the sin you can live with." -Ig Perrish

We can use this thread to keep track of which players are deserving of going to Hawaii.

As of Week 7:

CB Brandon Browner = also obvious

Hmmm........ You say Browner is an obvious pro bowler, but you insisted that we trade him during our board mock draft. What gives?

How does his performance in 2012 correlate with a mock draft done in the offseason?

Because he was a Pro Bowler in 2011 and likely a Pro Bowler in 2012. I can't for the life of me, figure out why you would wanna get rid of that. Just as it was back then, it doesn't make sense. I always thought in order to build a winning program, you should keep the good players and ditch the bad players. That's all I'm saying. _________________"People say you should always do the right thing, but sometimes there is no right thing. And then, you just have to pick the sin you can live with." -Ig Perrish

We can use this thread to keep track of which players are deserving of going to Hawaii.

As of Week 7:

CB Brandon Browner = also obvious

Hmmm........ You say Browner is an obvious pro bowler, but you insisted that we trade him during our board mock draft. What gives?

How does his performance in 2012 correlate with a mock draft done in the offseason?

He's saying your evaluation of him was wrong

To be fair, Cromartie would be pretty sick to have paired with Sherm.

We didn't get Cromartie though. We ended up replacing Browner with a rookie. _________________"People say you should always do the right thing, but sometimes there is no right thing. And then, you just have to pick the sin you can live with." -Ig Perrish

We can use this thread to keep track of which players are deserving of going to Hawaii.

As of Week 7:

CB Brandon Browner = also obvious

Hmmm........ You say Browner is an obvious pro bowler, but you insisted that we trade him during our board mock draft. What gives?

How does his performance in 2012 correlate with a mock draft done in the offseason?

Because he was a Pro Bowler in 2011 and likely a Pro Bowler in 2012. I can't for the life of me, figure out why you would wanna get rid of that. Just as it was back then, it doesn't make sense. I always thought in order to build a winning program, you should keep the good players and ditch the bad players. That's all I'm saying.

He didn't deserve the Pro Bowler in 2011, he wasn't even the best corner on his team. He only got it because of his interceptions. He didn't play like a Probowl CB, he got beat fairly often and committed a huge amount of penalties.
This year he have played better, but there is no way Browner makes the Pro Bowl this year with the way Bears corners are playing. Sherman isn't even a Pro Bowl lock, he deserves it, but I'm not sure he makes it.

It's a stretch to use the Pro Bowl to measure Browners play I think, don't get me wrong, Browner is a very good corner, but he isn't playing at Probowl level when you compare him to his competition._________________

I agree. I could see Charles Tillman and Richard Sherman being the two starting NFC corners. Sherm has too much media attention to be ignored now, the man made it onto ESPN in person .

Browner COULD be an alternative though.

Tillman and Sherman should definitely be the starting corners from the NFC. I love the attention that Sherman gets right now, he deserves it. Right now he isn't even in the top 5 for NFC corners in the Pro bowl voting right now _________________

I agree. I could see Charles Tillman and Richard Sherman being the two starting NFC corners. Sherm has too much media attention to be ignored now, the man made it onto ESPN in person .

Browner COULD be an alternative though.

Tillman and Sherman should definitely be the starting corners from the NFC. I love the attention that Sherman gets right now, he deserves it. Right now he isn't even in the top 5 for NFC corners in the Pro bowl voting right now

I'm not surprised, although he should get the vote of the experts who are in love with him.

I agree. I could see Charles Tillman and Richard Sherman being the two starting NFC corners. Sherm has too much media attention to be ignored now, the man made it onto ESPN in person .

Browner COULD be an alternative though.

Which is almost a guarantee that he will play because at least half the guys are going to bail out of that game...unless, of course, the Seahawks make the Super Bowl then I don't think any of our guys are eligible to play since it's during the bye week in between the SB and conference champ. games, IIRC._________________Consistent application beats complex programming.

I agree. I could see Charles Tillman and Richard Sherman being the two starting NFC corners. Sherm has too much media attention to be ignored now, the man made it onto ESPN in person .

Browner COULD be an alternative though.

Which is almost a guarantee that he will play because at least half the guys are going to bail out of that game...unless, of course, the Seahawks make the Super Bowl then I don't think any of our guys are eligible to play since it's during the bye week in between the SB and conference champ. games, IIRC.