Plans to adjust the criteria for adults needing help and support from Coventry's social services have been challenged by Socialist councillors.

It follows a report from social services director John Bolton, which looked at tightening up the criteria for care to try to save money.

The Evening Telegraph revealed last week the report recommended tightening the restrictions on the criteria for people receiving support.

It said elderly and disabled people in Coventry would be affected by the cutbacks.

Mr Bolton recommended thorough consultation with people receiving help, as well as their carers, charities, health services and other interested groups,

But councillors Dave Nellist, Rob Windsor and Karen McKay, who all represent St Michael's ward, say the report is "looking at the problem upside down."

They say that instead of making cuts, the council should join with trade unions and support groups in Coventry to demand extra cash from the government - cash which they say would "make up the chronic loss in funds over many years."

In a report, the three ask council officers to "demonstrate how a tightened eligibility criteria fits with the council's duty of care."

Cllr Windsor said: "We are concerned that a number of people will fall off the edge when it comes to getting care and support when it is needed.

"There is also a distinct possibility that those declared ineligible under a new scheme could deteriorate and need even more input in the future.

"Finally, we hope that if those with the most experience in these matters - the providers and recipients of support and their families - decide that this is a risky strategy, that they will be listened to.

"We fail to see how a tightened eligibility criteria based on cash calculations will provide better care and support."

Cllr Windsor said:"The New Labour government has upped the budget for the war in Iraq to &#xA3;5 billion, yet is pushing councils to scratch around for resources.

"It needs to invest now in decent public services for the vulnerable."