Keir Hardie and the founders of the Labour Party were clear 116 years ago that the goal of the party was to implement Labour’s values in office. Clause 1 of our constitution leaves no room for doubt when it says our purpose is “to organise and maintain in Parliament and in the country a political Labour Party…to promote the election of Labour Party representatives at all levels of the democratic process.”

Labour rightly protests against those who stand in the way of the fight for equality and justice. But we are not a protest group. We aim to do so much more: to build a fairer, more equal, democratic and environmentally sustainable Britain by harnessing the power of government.

Against squalor and ignorance

As a result we have become the biggest political changemakers in UK history. From the Attlee Government’s crusade against squalor, ignorance, want, idleness, and disease, to the equalities legislation of the Wilson government that gave both my parents – an English/Irish woman and Nigerian man – rights they did not previously have at work, Labour governments have touched all our lives for the better.

Indeed, the tax credits our current leader boasts of defending against Tory attack and the national minimum wage he says he would increase were both introduced by his Labour predecessors – Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

A long way to go

That was the past but Labour has always been in the future business. We are a great country with huge potential. Yet in my borough of Lambeth – located in one of the richest cities in the world – 40 per cent of children live in poverty, the average property price is more than ten times the average salary, with sky high rents and a creaking infrastructure.

If you look at places like Tech City to the East of London, we see opportunities and the future but, sadly, it is a world away from too many people. So the work of progressives is never finished. We must continue our mission to change Britain – “change “ being the key point of distinction from the Conservatives, a party established to “conserve” the status quo.

Only room for one

Under our flawed First-Past-the-Post electoral system, there is only room for one main party of Government on the Left: The Labour Party. First-past-the-post should be abolished and replaced with the fairer and more democratic system of proportional representation – already used in Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and London. But it is the system we are saddled with and – again – you need to win power to change it.

“We must be a broad church representing the full spectrum of opinion”

Opinium recently asked people where they placed themselves on the political spectrum. 10 per cent described themselves as “Left wing”, 15 per cent “Centre left”, 45 per cent “Centre”, 17 per cent “Centre right” and 13 per cent “Right wing”. Of course people describing themselves as being on the Left may agree with views on the Right and vice-versa, but to win under FPTP this shows we must be a broad church representing the full spectrum of opinion from the Left to the Centre of those who vote in British politics (no one has ever won an election relying on non-voters to get you over the line).

We need to show how we can deliver

This does not necessitate junking our social-democratic and democratic socialist ideals; it is the principal way to make them real. It entails showing – as we did in 1945, the 1960s, 1970s and from 1997 – how our values can deliver a better life for people. We should not patronise people by suggesting if they have ever voted Tory it’s because they are inherently selfish and have been brainwashed by the mainstream media.

“We should not patronise people by suggesting if they have ever voted Tory it’s because they are inherently selfish and have been brainwashed by the mainstream media.”

After all, what Labour leader has ever been given an easy ride by Fleet Street? We should be seeking to convince them that our values – translated through credible, deliverable policies – provide a better vehicle for each person to achieve their hopes and dreams not only for themselves and their families but their communities too. We are currently failing to do this.

Represent Britain

In the most recent polling by YouGov, 29 per cent of Owen Smith supporters and 36 per cent of Jeremy Corbyn supporters say they will leave the Party if their candidate does not win. I would urge all of them to stay. We need them all because we cannot hope to achieve our mission and illustrate that we provide the best answers if any one part of the party takes its bat, quits and walks off the field, leaving us confined to a narrow part of the political spectrum.

“We cannot allow bullies to take over our movement and force out any part of the Labour tradition”

If we fail to be representative of Britain and its different shades of progressive opinion, we won’t be capable of appealing to that vital election winning coalition of voters. Long before the current leadership contest, poll after poll showed we were struggling to do this and be relevant – the task will not be made easier by pretending away this fact or, importantly, if any part of our Labour family walks out of the family home.

Splitting won’t work

Some, mainly Conservative leaning media outlets, have unsurprisingly been gently promoting the idea, not only of members quitting, but Labour splitting and a new party being formed, like the Social Democratic Party in 1981. Twenty-eight MPs defected from Labour to the SDP back then but just 6 SDP MPs were elected in the 1983 election that followed. That split of the Left was a gift to the Right, which saw 18 years of Tory rule as the consequence. This is why I know of no Labour MP now who wants to repeat the same mistake and doom our country to the same fate.

I have been an activist in my local party for nearly 20 years but have never known the internal atmosphere nationally be so tense. Before the leadership contest last year, there were simply not the levels of abuse, intimidation and vitriol on social media that now too often spills over into some party meetings. So I can understand why some wish to disengage.

Bigger, better, stronger

But we cannot allow bullies to take over our movement and force out any part of the Labour tradition, all strands of which have the right to a voice whoever is the leader. The Labour family is bigger, better and stronger than that. Our diversity has always been our greatest strength and this is no better exemplified than by the broad church of our movement – community activists, faith groups, trade unionists and more – all working together able to vigorously debate, in a spirit of solidarity and mutual respect. This is what we must to return to.

When we look at those who inspired us to go into politics, not only our party’s founders, but champions of social justice around the world – like Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi and Aung San Suu Kyi – they faced much greater hurdles than any present day member and supporter of the British Labour Party. They would never have waved the white flag and walked away from their cause. Nor should we.

Chuka Umunna is the Labour MP for Streatham and a member of the Home Affairs Select Committee.

This article is part of a series we’re running on the future of the Labour party. If you enjoyed it, read more below:

We know that sometimes it’s easier for us to come to you with the news. That's why our new email newsletter will deliver a mobile-friendly snapshot of inews.co.uk to your inbox every morning, from Monday to Saturday.

This will feature the stories you need to know, as well as a curated selection of the best reads from across the site. Of course, you can easily opt out at any time, but we're confident that you won't.

Oliver Duff, Editor

By entering your email address and clicking on the sign up button below, you are agreeing to receive the latest daily news, news features and service updates from the i via email. You can unsubscribe at any time and we will not pass on your information.