Acer XF XF240H 24" vs Asus PB298Q: 32 facts in comparison

1. response time

Response time is how long it takes for a display to change the state of pixels, in order to show new content. The less time it takes to respond, the less likely it is to blur fast-changing images.

1ms

Acer Predator XB2 (XB252Q) 24.5": 1ms

5ms

2. power consumption operation

How much power the device consumes when it's switched on.

23W

Sharp LB-1085: 1.1W

31.7W

3. screen size

The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.

24"

Sharp LB-1085: 108"

29"

4. has a HDMI output

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

Acer XF XF240H 24"

Asus PB298Q

60% have it

5. every pixel has three subpixels

The device has a display with three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.

Acer XF XF240H 24"

Asus PB298Q

85% have it

6. resolution

33.33% higher resolution.

1920 x 1080px

Dell UltraSharp UP3218K: 7680 x 4320px

2560 x 1080px

7. supports total tilt

Total tilt adjustment is the ability for the monitor head to move up and down. Tilt adjustment enables a user to change the viewing position of the display, creating a more comfortable view of the screen.

Acer XF XF240H 24"

Asus PB298Q

83% have it

8. has an IPS screen

IPS (In-Plane Switching) is a technology used for LCDs. It was designed to overcome the main limitations of normal TFTs TN-matrices: relatively slow response times, small viewing angles and low quality color reproduction.

Acer XF XF240H 24"

Asus PB298Q

33% have it

9. luminance

Luminance is the intensity of light that a device emits.

350cd/m²

Acer Predator X35 35" UW-UXGA: 1000cd/m²

300cd/m²

10. maximum horizontal viewing angle

Horizontal viewing angle is the maximum angle at which a display can be viewed with acceptable visual performance.