Comments

Hello Everyone,
This patch will fix a FAIL in one of the test cases for array notations. The reason for fail is that the array sizes were huge and thus it was causing a stack overflow. This patch should fix the issue. I am committing this patch as semi-obvious. I am willing to revert this change if anyone has objections.
2013-06-25 Balaji V. Iyer <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>
* c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c: Fixed a bug of stack
overflow due to size of arrays.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Hello Everyone,> This patch will fix a FAIL in one of the test cases for array notations. The reason for fail is that the array sizes were huge and thus it was causing a stack overflow. This patch should fix the issue. I am committing this patch as semi-obvious. I am willing to revert this change if anyone has objections.>> 2013-06-25 Balaji V. Iyer <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>>> * c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c: Fixed a bug of stack> overflow due to size of arrays.
It looks like this is the same situation as PR57766.
(You're already CC:ed on it. Is your @gcc.gnu.org email
address correctly redirected?)
brgds, H-P

> -----Original Message-----> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson [mailto:hp@bitrange.com]> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 7:24 PM> To: Iyer, Balaji V> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR 57692> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:> > Hello Everyone,> > This patch will fix a FAIL in one of the test cases for array notations. The> reason for fail is that the array sizes were huge and thus it was causing a stack> overflow. This patch should fix the issue. I am committing this patch as semi-> obvious. I am willing to revert this change if anyone has objections.> >> > 2013-06-25 Balaji V. Iyer <balaji.v.iyer@intel.com>> >> > * c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c: Fixed a bug of stack> > overflow due to size of arrays.> > It looks like this is the same situation as PR57766.> (You're already CC:ed on it. Is your @gcc.gnu.org email address correctly> redirected?)
Hi Hans,
I am getting those emails and am fixing them and submitting patches to gcc-patches. The fix was similar, but it was occurring in different testsuite case. Also, it was not occurring any of the machines I use to develop and so I didn't see the similarity between them.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
> > brgds, H-P