Archaeopteryx (unlike Archaeoraptor) is NOT a hoax—it is
a true bird, not a “missing link”

With all the publicity about the Archaeoraptor fiasco (see Archaeoraptor Hoax Update—National Geographic Recants!),
some have recalled the 1986 claim by Sir Fred Hoyle
and Dr Chandra Wickramasinghe that Archaeopteryx is a forgery.1Archaeopteryx is one
of the most famous of the alleged transitional forms promoted by evolutionists.
This is probably why some anti-Darwinians are keen to dismiss it as a forgery.

However, in the article, Bird evolution flies out the window,
the creationist anatomist Dr David Menton shows
that Archaeopteryx is a true bird with flight feathers, not a transitional
form—and certainly not a feathered dinosaur. And Dr Alan Feduccia, a world
authority on birds at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an evolutionist
himself (see Feduccia v Creationists),
says:

“Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound,
feathered dinosaur. But it’s not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount
of ‘paleobabble’ is going to change that.”2

Both these expert scientists totally reject the charge of forgery. Dr Menton
points out that the Archaeopteryx bones have tiny bumps where the feathers
were attached to the bones by ligaments. This was unexpected, so impossible to attribute
to a forgery. So it is simply wrong to say that the feathers are just imprints added
to a dino skeleton.

Also, Alan Fedducia, in his encyclopedic The Origin and Evolution of Birds,3 cites a number of reasons
why Fred Hoyle is completely wrong. For example, limestone often contains dendritic
(tree-like) patterns formed by precipitating manganese dioxide, and they are unique
as are snowflakes. Some of them are on both the slab and counterslab containing
the Solnhofen Archaeopteryx fossil, including some on top of the feather
imprints. Alan Charig et al. found that when he backwardly printed a negative
photograph of the counterslab dendrite patterns, they match perfectly with the corresponding
dendrites of the main slab. Therefore the dendrites must have formed on the bedding
plane before the slab was split.

Since that book, more recent evidence has even further devastated the hoax theory:

The skeletons had pneumatized vertebrae and pelvis. This indicates the presence
of both a cervical and abdominal air sac, i.e. at least two of the five sacs present
in modern birds. This in turn indicates that the unique
avian lung design was already present in what most evolutionists claim is
the earliest bird.4 An
evolutionist trying to forge a dinosaur with feathers would not have thought to
pneumatize allegedly reptilian bones. Rather, the evidence supports the creationist
view that birds have always been birds.

Analysis of the skull with computer tomography (CT) scanning shows that Archaeopteryx
had a brain like a modern bird’s, three times the size of that of a dinosaur
of equivalent size (although smaller than that of living birds). Archaeopteryx
even had large optic lobes to process the visual input needed for flying. Furthermore,
even the inner ear had a cochlea length and semicircular canal propoprtions were
in the range of a modern flying bird’s. This implies that Archaeopteryx
could hear in a similar way, and also had the sense of balance required for coordinating
flight.5 Pterosaurs likewise
had similar brain structures for flight—the large optic lobes, semicircular
canals for balance, and huge floccular lobes, probably for coordination of the head,
eye and neck allowing gaze-stabilization while flying.6 Once more, a forger adding feathers to a dino would
not have thought to make an avian braincase, while it is yet another problem for
evolutionists.

Creation Ministries International will not stock any books that promote
the Archaeopteryx hoax idea, at least not without a disclaimer, because
it is the truth which shall set you free (cf.John 8:32), not error.

Evolution is supported and endorsed by governments, the media, our major educational institutions and many big businesses. But look at this site and see how much can be achieved with a little effort from God's people in supporting such outreach. Support this site