On the expectedly asinine dialectic of the self styled enlightened (are we still a Unified Unitarian…with that level of spittle flecked invective, I’d posit not)

If you can get past all the , frankly, adolescent – “ermagerd I swerd aren’t you shocked and awed you should be” invective, what you arrive at is still “ermagerd I swerd aren’t you shocked and awed you should be” invective, then what you arrive at is still “ermagerd I swerd aren’t you shocked and awed you should be” invective, them what you arrive at again is still ermagerd I swerd aren’t you shocked and awed you should be” invective, then what you arrive yet again, at is still “ermagerd I swerd aren’t you shocked and awed you should be” invective, what you continue arrive at is still …..

Need I go on?

And this passes as an intellectual exposé of what exactly?

Or is it just a juvenile sweary frap fest of incitement against those named?