28/06/2012

“Allah has created us in such a country in which people of different faiths live; the majority of countrymen is also justice-loving and are in search of truth. If something is presented sincerely, they have the nerve to accept it. Therefore, being an Ummah enjoined to do Dawah, it is our duty to reach the pristine teachings of Islam out to them, acquaint them with the concept of monotheism and the humane attitude of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be to him) and explain to them the importance and benefits of the way of life presented by Islam and its concord with human wisdom and nature. If we perform this enjoined duty, our identification in this country will be that of a group that has not only the receiving hands but giving hands as well, whose members are the merchants of love and a source of mercy to humanity. The problems the Muslims in India are confronting with are the result of their indifference to this duty. There is still time for us to realise our responsibility and make concerted efforts to acquaint the people with the real teachings of their Creator and Master.”

Yes, this is our enjoined dutyThe above-mentioned statement is an extract from the Declaration All India Muslim Majlis-e-Mushawarat released during its 22nd session. This session was held in Mumbai from 20th to 22nd April. During the session the Mushawarat discussed many issues and took many decisions, the details of which appeared in Urdu newspapers. But this Declaration was of utmost importance because besides bringing the Ummah closer to Shari’ah requirements, and drawing their attention to protect the symbols of Islam as well as the Islamic Shari’ah and creating unity in their ranks, it also pinpointed an important need, and that need is of doing Dawah, which is not a need but a duty as has been said in the Declaration. “We are an Ummah enjoined to do Dawah and it is our duty to convey the teachings of Islam to the countrymen.” (Dawat Sehroza, May 1) This is perhaps the first time in the 40-year history of Personal Law Board that the issue of Islamic Dawah has been raised in such a powerful voice while emphasis on removing the misunderstandings of countrymen has been always laid.

Do this duty forthwith
What planning Personal Law Board has done in this regard is not known. If not, it should do this duty forthwith as this is the most important work to do today. Praise be to Allah, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind has been busy doing this duty since the very first day of its inception. Although some individuals and institutions have been also doing this service for the last few years yet only the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind is active in this field all over the country in an organised and planned manner. But it is obvious that it is not possible for one single organisation or institution to do justice with this task in such a large country; all organisations and institutions should strive to do this duty collectively, or at least extend every possible cooperation to the Jamaat that is active to perform this duty of Islamic Dawah in a planned and well-organised manner and help remove the obstacles in its way. And, if the Muslims in India start this work properly, its result will come God willing into light. Now when Muslim Personal Law Board has drawn the attention of Ummah formally, let its voice does not prove ineffective; it must find expression in a definite manner.

25/06/2012

If we analyse the situation unfolding in Egypt right from the Tahrir Square protests last year till date and ask the question as to which is the single question, the answer of which should be sought on preferential basis, to most of people that question would be: How did Ahmad Shafiq get so many votes? The Tahrir Square Movement was against the 30-year despotism of Hosni Mubarak and all the institutions and individuals associated with it. In this view, any person of that government should not have dared to come before the public, not to say of an important part of that oppressive regime being the candidate for the topmost position in the country and his reaching almost the level of Ikhwan candidate in both the rounds of election. Were the Egyptian people so foolish to get the same filth imposed upon them after it was annulled by their struggle against it? This is indeed a big question rather the biggest question. But one question is bigger than this. And that is about the silence of so-called lovers of democracy, advocates of democracy and banner-holders of democracy against the attempts being taken one after another to kill the new-born democracy in Egypt.

It’s already apprehendedIt was already apprehended that this democracy emerging from the western methods would not be liked by the westerners themselves and their Asian followers because they knew that the emergence of democracy in Egypt meant the emergence of Islamists, which they cannot bear at any cost. Even then it was thought that just out of shame and out of requirement of their being pro-democracy they would voice against the despotic measures of Egypt’s Supreme Council of Armed Forces. But it didn’t happen. First of all the military despots disqualified on petty excuses the Ikhwan candidate Khairat al-Shater and the candidate of Al-Noor; no one reacted; and then much against their own devised principle that no one from the Mubarak cabinet can be a candidate (for presidential poll), they allowed Ahmad Shafiq to fight the election (rather they fielded him), but it didn’t affect the western world even a bit. Then they most brazenly dissolved the elected parliament in the broad-day light; but America and all its democratic allies kept mum. And seeing the signs of Morsi win on June 17 issued the orders that the powers of president would be limited, and real power will rest with the Supreme Council of Armed Forces. The banner-holders of democracy did not feel perturbed save and except the Pentagon expressed customary sorrow.

The benefit of this dualismThen the biggest question about Egypt must be nothing but this. But the problem is that who will discuss it; international media is in the service of these killers and forces of exploitation and Indian media follows the suit. None has the moral strength to stop the killers of democracy in Egypt. It is so because if anyone does so, he would have to face the charge of supporting Ikhwan. – However there is one benefit of this situation that all the drum-beaters of western democracy stood revealed before at least those persons who are gentle by nature and feel hurt by this mockery with the people’s aspirations in Egypt. Such persons are silent and not active while the entire media is in the hands of liars and perjurers – and as for Ikhwan al-Muslimoon, this situation is not unexpected for them. They have been bearing such excesses of Egyptian army and its western masters; their physique is by the grace of Allah very strong; their faith is unshaken. They will come out with flying colours, if Allah so wills.

23/06/2012

He was 13 years old when he along with his family reached Israel from Tajikistan. This was his new native land. When he was 18, he had to undergo mandatory military training and do military service as per Israeli law. Now he is 23 and hates the state of Israel. He has renounced his new native land and wants to adopt Palestinian citizenship and settle down over there. Not only this, he wants to be part of the Palestinian Resistance Movement. “I hate Zionism ... I call for other Israelis who support the existence of a state of Palestine to do the same, to come live in the West Bank or Gaza as Palestinians.” (The Indian Express, June 15, with reference to A.P.) Releasing this news, the agency has said that the incident of Andre Pshenichnikov is one of the incredibly rare ones that take place. There are only a few known cases of Jewish Israelis who have done so, mostly ones who have married Palestinians.The news that is killedBut this is not wholly true. The fact remains that such incidents take place in a considerable number if not at large scale. This is another matter that they are not reported. Israel is a prison not only for the Palestinians but for its own citizens as well. There is strict censorship on media; everyone cannot report every incident. There has been news that common citizens especially aged Jewish citizens support the Palestinian cause; some of them live with Palestinian Muslims while some others support them from their own places. The most important fact in this regard is that certain Jewish citizens turn back to their real faith viz. Islam after getting influenced with the behaviour of Palestinian Muslims, their sense of service and their solid arguments about their faith. And this is the fact that the government of Israel keeps unreported. Two departments of Hamas, Dawah and Social Service, play a very important role in this regard and this is what the government of Israel fears most.The headache of the occupying governmentYes, this is a big headache of the Tel Aviv administration. This is why it does not want the Jewish citizens to meet the Palestinians especially Hamas people and maintain contact with them. It is for this purpose that they put embankments on the Palestinian borders and from time to time seal the borders, sometimes in the name of preventing stone-pelting and some other times to stop without-permit Palestinian labourers. This is one of the causes of Gaza siege. – The Department of Social Service of Hamas is perhaps the most active among the Departments of Social Service of Islamic Movements, which renders service to the needy despite its limited resources irrespective of religion and faith. The aged Jewish citizens, who have none to look after them, are especially in contact with Hamas. Besides the needy, those who are not in need also maintain contact with Hamas and talk to them on faith issues and on the history of Prophets. – It is not known yet what the source of inspiration for the change of heart of Andre Pshenichnikov, who migrated from Tajikistan to Israel, is. If probed, a new story of the mischief of the Zionist state would come to light.

21/06/2012

The feeling of Catholic Church in Goa is that “Israeli tourists visiting the State ‘were devoid of human emotions’, do not care for the feelings and emotions of other people, do very immodest and obscene acts among themselves, get intoxicated every time, their nights here never end, do not hesitate in switching partners.... Their dominating nature and other monkey business drives away other tourists....” Goa Catholic Church has expressed these feelings in an open letter to the Jerusalem Inter-Church Centre (The Asian Age, Jun 12). Deccan Herald and IANS reports say that these feelings of the Church functionaries are the result of their observations and surveys of many years. A book has also been published on this subject. Besides Goa, information has been sought from Israel and Palestine. It is to be mentioned here that it is mandatory for every citizen of Israel to get military training. The Government of Israel sends those getting this 3-year training to Bangkok, Goa and Bali on tour to get entertainment and “relaxed”.

And this chain of informationDuring the last few days there were many news items on Israel and Zionists. On Jun 11, an inscription was found written on the wall of Holocaust Museum: “Thank you Hitler [for the Holocaust]... Only because of the Holocaust did we receive a state....” On the wall there were also some slogans criticising the state of Israel and Zionism. Professor Shlomo Sand of Tel Aviv University, in his Hebrew book, has proved that that the term ‘Land of Israel’ or ‘Land of Maud’ is the invention of Zionists that has nothing to do with reality. The establishment of the state of Israel is wrong, illegal, immoral and irreligious in every respect. Israel’s state comptroller, in his report, has severely criticised the decision of Benjamin dispensation, whereby the Turkish flotilla was attacked on May 31, 2010. This flotilla was bound to Gaza and 600 persons were aboard it. Nine persons were done to death in the Israeli attack. The comptroller has said that this decision was totally wrong; for this Israel has earned worldwide criticism. (The Indian Express, Jun 14) The Vatican has clarified that the recent financial agreement with Israel does not mean acceptance of East Jerusalem as part of Israel.

Details of these contentsIf you browse the Internet, you will find hundreds of pages on details of the conspiracies for the establishment of the Zionist state, the atrocities it has committed against humanity during the last 64 years, the dangerous moral evils it has been spreading all over the world, how Americans have been using it to server their interests, and the dangers it has posed to world peace and human morality. But for the time being the voice coming from Goa deserves our immediate attention. Though the Government of Goa and its Department of Tourism do not believe in high moral order and obscenity is being promoted at its coasts under state patronage yet its Department of Tourism is perturbed with the highly immoral activities of Israelis. Ten thousand Israeli citizens visit Goa every year. The Catholic Church there that represents four lakh Christians, has raised its voice against their sexual anarchy and waywardness. This voice cannot be neglected. The Union Government ought to take serious notice of it before this moral depravity affect the social fabric of the country.19//06/12 khabar-O-Nazar by Parwaaz Rahmani, sehrozaDAWAT, translated by: Abu Yusuf

16/06/2012

No
sooner had the hoo-hah on the cartoons of Dr. Ambedkar in a book of government
publication wing NCERT cooled down than one more cartoon related to the
anti-Hindi movement of South India published in another book came to light. DMK
and some other groups said that the anti-Hindi agitation has been presented
erroneously in the cartoon. The issue was still hot when the leaders of Tamil
Nadu raised one more question. PMK party leader S Ramdas and MDMK leader Vaiko
on Jun 9 revealed in Madras that in the Social Science textbooks of state
government syllabus for Classes VIII and X Devanagri Hindi has been mentioned
as Selected National Language and teachers have been teaching this subject all
over the state. They said this is a historical mistake. Hindi is not the
national language; it is simply a government language. Ramdas has demanded that
this lesson should be immediately deleted and a criminal case be initiated
against those responsible for preparing the text. Had it not been done, a state
level agitation will be launched. (The Asian Age, Jun 10) According to
reports, anti-Hindi campaign in Tamil Nadu is hotting up once again.

Why
the element of hatred?

These
three kinds of agitation are for one cause, but the element of ‘hatred’ has
been included therein to put weight in it and make it popular. This is human
weakness and also the Indian tradition. No agitation succeeds without violent
hatred. While there should be no need of hateful agitation for proper demands,
but people do this as without it attention is not paid to a demand. Kanshi Ram
and his successor made their debut in the political field with the slogan
“Tilak, Tarazoo aur Talwar, inko maro joote chaar”. This movement of theirs
against Brahmins and so-called high classes proved successful. They made Dr.
Ambedkar enjoy a high place in Indian politics or got his due place restored;
however now the situation is that no one dares to speak against the doctor. –
The history of anti-Hindi sentiment in South India is very old. Big protests
against Hindi were staged for the first time in Madras state in 1938. When
Hindi was declared as State language of the country in 1965, the entire Tamil
Nadu witnessed violent protests and a precedent of self-immolation was established.
Thereafter the power of Dravid parties in the state was recognised.

Social
scientists should take notice of it

There
is some semblance between the demands of Dalit castes and the Dravid cause
though their violent strategies cannot be supported. But some people exploit
this formula just to divide human beings and to make their respective castes
popular. Forty-five years ago, Balasaheb Thackeray started his campaign in
Maharashtra by making speeches, writing articles and sketching cartoons against
the people of South India living in Bombay; he got popularity in no time. Later
on, he made some other experiments with this formula. And today he is
considered the uncrowned king of Mumbai. Twenty years ago Uma Bharati attained
popularity by making incessant speeches against Muslims and targeting Babri
Masjid. Some more people got fame by getting that historical structure
demolished. Ten years ago chief minister of Gujarat led a hateful campaign
against one section of his own public; as a result thousands of people were
done to death. And even today he is “popular” due to this very “achievement” of
his (this is sheer absurdity that he is popular due to developmental work in
the state). During the general elections in 2009 a young leader in UP got “popularity”
in no times by abusing Muslims right from the stage. – This is a very typical
situation of Indian electoral politics. Social scientists should take notice of
it.

14/06/2012

Anders Breivik says that the action he took to kill dozens of humans at a place in Oslo was the result of his hatred for Muslims. And this hatred he had nurtured right from his childhood when he was very young. In an Oslo court on Jun 4, he explained in great detail the cause of his hatred with reference to his experiences. For example, the Turk father of his friend had broken his bicycle; when he was 15 years old, a Pakistani taxi driver had slapped him for his hanging by a car on the way; a citizen of Kosovo had threatened his friend; someone had attacked the younger sister of his friend with a knife, although he cannot say with certainty who he was yet it is his opinion that he must have been a Muslim. – After having heard his statement, the judge asked him whether he had also some positive experience with Muslims. Then Breivik said that the good about Muslims is that they are very loyal. (The Indian Express, Jun 5, with reference to Associated Press)

This story has been concoctedThis Anders Breivik is the same person who on Jul 22, 2011 fired incessantly and killed 77 persons and rendered dozens injured at a public place in Oslo. Initially the international Zionist media had reported that this too was an act of “Islamic terrorists” but Anders was caught soon and confessed the crime; so the media did not get the opportunity to carry forward the story (as a few years ago after killing Pramod Mahajan in Mumbai his brother presented himself in the police station and thus the mischief-mongers had no opportunity to weave the story). However the media and experts in Muslim enmity got success in teaching him another lesson that he had committed this act as an expression of his hatred for and enmity with Muslims while everyone can feel that this story of his is ridiculous. The causes of his Muslim enmity that he has mentioned are insufficient for nurturing hatred for an entire community. Going through his entire story, the most that can be observed is that he is a member of some right wing group and that he hates every foreigner irrespective of who he is.

More probableBut what seems to be more probable rather proper to a great extent is that Anders Breivik is an imbalanced person; his mental balance is not in order. It is in this mental condition that he committed this act. The angle of Muslim enmity is quite beyond comprehension as he claims having hatred for and enmity with Muslims but fires incessantly and kills his own countrymen. Does this ever happen? The fact remains that the story of the script writer of Breivik is lifeless. However in his entire statement that he made in the court on Jun 4 only one thing is considerable rather meaningful that he sees the Muslims as very loyal. This remark of his just reverses the remaining story. It is quite possible that this is the only remark that he said outspokenly while replying to a question of the judge and the remaining story might have been prepared by the lawyers. His sentence shows that he had had an opportunity to be in contact with Muslims. – If some reliable and unbiased agency analyses the entire story of Anders Breivik, some interesting facts come to light. However there is great contrast between Breivik’s statement and this statement of his.

11/06/2012

With reference to Pakistan and America, there has been regularly in news these days a Pakistani doctor who, according to his and America’s claim, had helped America in getting Osama bin Laden caught in Abbottabad. It was the news that this doctor named Shakil Afridi had claimed to have got a sample of the DNA of Bin Laden with the help of a vaccine and informed the CIA about it, after which this American agency narrated to the world the story of killing Bin Laden in an air attack on a house in Abbottabad. A few days ago the news was that a tribal court of Khaibar Agency declared the doctor perfidious and pronounced a sentence of 33 years. Then there was the news that America expressed its displeasure thereon as it treats the doctor as a hero and its faithful. Then it was in the news that the government of Pakistan most humbly and meekly communicated to Washington that the latter should respect the Pakistani laws. And now the current information in this regard is that the Pakistani court had sentenced the doctor not for coordinating with the CIA but for helping “Islamic extremists” (The Times of India, May 31).

The US purpose was something else
And thus the apprehension of those who had been applauding Pakistan for its courage and sense of honour, was removed though this government itself was in cooperation with America in the American action in Abbottabad. This is another matter that America did not deem it necessary to take Pakistan in confidence before the action as the ruled are not taken in confidence. But when later on it issued an order to dismantle the house in Abbottabad, the Pakistanis did not make any delay in complying with it. But the purpose of Americans with this entire episode of the Pakistani doctor was something else, which was served. Although the world believes the tale of killing of Bin Laden in Abbottabad yet there is a large segment of masses which takes it no more than an American drama like the drama of “9/11”. And it is the concerted effort of Americans that this segment too accepts this lie as a gospel truth. So, like “9/11”, news about Abbottabad is released with periodic intervals so that people might believe that the person killed on May 2, 2011 in Abbottabad was none but Bin Laden. There is no doubt that they get success in playing this mischief; otherwise why the tribals of Khaibar Agency would have called that doctor treacherous ; they also believe that none but Bin Laden lived in that house of Abbottabad.

And this sentimental segment of ours
And not to say of the tribals of Khaibar Agency only, a sentimental segment among Muslims that has surface-level thinking believes in American tales. Certain Urdu newspapers represent this segment. Therefore, while analysing the news related to the Pakistani doctor they do criticise America in the severest terms but unconsciously they are serving its cause in the sense that they are accepting that the person killed in the house of Abbottabad was none but Osama – while the story of the Pakistani doctor is clear that he was a character in the American drama. He neither took a sample of DNA nor did he see any person like Bin Laden. He was just asked to make a statement for which he was paid heavily by the CIA because this Dr Shakil Afridi is a characterless and X-rated person as the Pakistani authorities themselves have said about him. He has a lust for money and wants to have money by any means. Characterless persons can do anything for money. And as for we the simple Muslims, we would take time in seeing through the depths and intricacies of conspiracies of the enemies of Islam and the Ummah that we do not have.

08/06/2012

When,
after the assassination of Anwar Sadat in October 1981, Gen. Hosni Mubarak came
in power in Egypt, certain Muslim sections thought that he would learn some
lesson from the ultimate end of Sadat. By signing the Camp David Agreement,
Sadat had sold the interests of Egyptians along with those of Palestinians. By
mortgaging Egypt to America, he had left Egypt’s security at the mercy of
Israel – an act that agitated the Egyptian army, who killed Sadat during an
army function. It was thought that Mubarak would loosen the bondage of American
slavery. But he didn’t, nor could he do as by signing Camp David, Egypt had
fallen totally in the grip of America and Israel. Mubarak was commanded to
protect the interests of Israel, not to let Islamic and democratic forces raise
their head, keep Ikhwan al-Muslimoon crushing. Mubarak did exactly this. As a
return, he started getting commission on one-sided trade, army and civil
agreements with American and European companies, the commission amount was
credited to his account in a regular manner, and thus his personal wealth
started getting accumulated.

Feeling
same, strategy different

The
modest but helpless people of Egypt kept on bearing all this for thirty years
but at last took to the streets. This feeling and emotion of the Egyptian
people, according to its reality, was the same to which Sadat had fallen prey
in 1981, but the method of expression was quite different. The method adopted
in 1981 earned criticism from some circles, in which the west was on the front;
but there was no room, not at all, for any criticism from any circle on the
method adopted in 2011. The movement of Tahrir Square was in strict accordance
with the western democratic standard. But this also remains the fact that the
hurt America and its old and new allies have been feeling with the change being
effected by their own method, was not the same with the army method in 1981;
rather then they had an opportunity to unleash the propaganda that “this is the
Islamic way of change”. But now the so-called democratic forces the world over
have become confounded. Therefore, these forces are active in halting the rise
of Islamic change and in making efforts to retain in whatsoever form may be the
American system of Mubarak. These forces are outside Egypt and inside as well.
And pronouncement of this minor punishment to Mubarak is part of those efforts
because the present courts and their judges are remnants of that system.

Hosni
Mubarak had said

In
the early years after 1981 Hosni Mubarak wanted to learn some lesson from the
end of his predecessor Anwar Sadat. It was during those days that Egypt hosted
a conference of Rabita Alam-e-Islami (Muslim World League), in which leaders
and representatives of Islamic Movements from all over the world participated.
On his return home from that conference, former Amir Jamaat-e-Islami Hind,
Maulana Muhammad Yusuf, during an informal talk, said that during the
conference Hosni Mubarak met some selected leaders of Islamic Movement and told
them that he was not against Islam and wanted that Ikhwan al-Muslimoon and
other Islamic groups cooperated with his government so that conflict can be
avoided and his governance might sail smoothly with two-side remissions. Late
Maulana Yusuf also expressed his feeling that Hosni Mubarak was under great
pressure from America – and later on it was evident from the actions of Mubarak
that whatever he was doing was in allegiance to America, and that he was
compelled to do so – it was as if Mubarak had submitted himself voluntarily to
the American slavery, the insulting punishment of which was bound to greet him.
But the due punishment for his crimes is yet to be pronounced.

04/06/2012

One
week before the polling for presidential election in Egypt last month, the 30
lakh [non-resident] Egyptians living in various other countries cast their
votes. The results of this polling were also announced before the main polling,
according to which Ikhwan candidate, Dr. Muhammad Morsi got over 36 per cent
votes and former leader of Ikhwan Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh (Independent) got
about 24 per cent votes. Other candidates Ahmed Shafiq, Amru Musa and Hamdain
Sabahi lagged much behind. On the basis of these results, those souls who have
been longing for having the experience of Islamic way of life in any part of
the earth were hopeful that the main polling would yield the desired result and
Dr. Mori would win 50 per cent in the very first round and there would be no
need of any run-off. This hope from the non-resident voting was strong because
a few months ago Ikhwan al-Muslimin had reaped a sweeping victory, and the
second runner was also an Islamic party, Al-Noor. There was no trace of the
faithfuls of Hosni Mubarak, the lovers of Gamal Abdel Nasser and [other]
Islam-bashers. During the presidential poll of May 23-24 the international
media, despite its best efforts, was not able to hide the fact that Dr. Morsi
was leading the contest and if someone was trailing him from a long distance it
was Aboul Fotouh.

The
message of Tahrir Square

And
the media was compelled to present this fact because this was the spirit of
public protests against Hosni Mubarak last year. Arrangements of Adhan and
Salat in congregation at Tahrir Square and participation of hijab-clad women
[in the protests] were sending a message to the world that they would give a
mandate in support of a government on Islamic principles if they got a chance
to form the government. But when the results of presidential election were out,
the picture was quite different. While the enthusiastic lovers of Islam the
world over felt a bit disappointed, a wave of pleasure and satisfaction ran
through the anti-Islam circles as the anti-Islam candidate Ahmed Shafiq was
brought almost to the level of Dr. Morsi. The pleasure of anti-Islam circles
found expression in the reports and editorial columns in Indian and
international media. This situation can be gauged with just one sentence in the
editorial of The Hindu of May 28: “They could well see him [Ahmed
Shafiq] as Egypt's best defence against the Islam[ism].…” – But while these
results and the international reactions thereon are surprising for simpleton
Muslims, they are not surprising and unexpected at all for those who are
acquainted with the history of anti-Islam forces, their methods and strategies.

But
despite these strategies

It
was feared right from the beginning that these forces, the leader of which is
America, would not remain sitting with ease; they would exploit every method to
stop the change because for them this is the question of life and death. They
know quite well that if a system is established on Islamic principles in any
part of the world and it is allowed to function then what would be its results
and consequences on the world. Therefore two strategies were applied in Egypt.
Soon after the parliamentary elections a powerful campaign was launched to
character-assassinate the Ikhwan. Propaganda was unleashed that Egypt would
fall prey to disintegration if such inexperienced people come to power. This
strategy was clear and visible. Another invisible strategy was to get lakhs of
fake votes cast in favour of Ahmed Shafiq, army personnel were compelled to do
so. – But despite all this, palpitation of Islam-bashers is getting faster. The
information and analyses up till the afternoon of May 31 tell that the
atmosphere is turning fast in favour of Dr. Morsi. There is only one question
before the Egyptians whether they want to keep the country, as earlier, under
the control of pro-American army generals, Israeli supporters and those
indifferent to Islam or a system based on independence, democracy and justice.
The developments have to say that the results of the second round election on
June 16 and 17 would go in favour of the other part of the question.