So they turn out to be a bunch of loyalist scumbags! Who'd have guessed it! Tony you need to reassess your opinion and remember it takes a stronger type of man to admit when he has made an error in judgment.

Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue would you be happy,unless it's a stunt on Michael Mc Intyre's show

Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue would you be happy,unless it's a stunt on Michael Mc Intyre's show

1. If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue and acted entirely lawfully, would you feel you have the right to break the law in response? 2. You clearly stated that you supported these groups "so long as they act within the law". Given that this group quite clearly broke several laws in response to them being 'unhappy' at something, is it not fair to assume that either you no longer support the group in question or else you were lying in saying your support was conditional on their law abiding behaviour?

Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue would you be happy,unless it's a stunt on Michael Mc Intyre's show

I was not sure about these groups but after hearing some snippets of Kevn Magees report on the radio and the comments of an ex senior police officer its clear this crowd are complete morons who are doing more harm than good. Foul mouth thugs who are clearly just in it for their own reasons. I would be interested to see the police records on these clowns because I have no doubt some of them would be extensive.

Look its a brilliant idea, and the intent of outing or at the very least making police aware of the potential to comit crimes on children by these people is good... But the methods are all wrong and none of it will really stick unless there are other things on that persons computer or the person actually has met a 14 year old, not a 35 year old woman on the internet sayings shes 14 on a site that you must be 18 to begin with!

I wonder how much support they will have now on FB, will probably lose half their support

Logged

Anything I post is not the view of the County Board!! Nobody died in the making of this post ;-)

I was not sure about these groups but after hearing some snippets of Kevn Magees report on the radio and the comments of an ex senior police officer its clear this crowd are complete morons who are doing more harm than good. Foul mouth thugs who are clearly just in it for their own reasons. I would be interested to see the police records on these clowns because I have no doubt some of them would be extensive.

Has Kevin Magee's report / investigation into these groups already been broadcast or if not is there any time / date? I'd be very interested in seeing it.