Carter v. Hinkle Case Brief

Facts: P and D get into an auto accident. P brings action against D and the owner of the car for the property damages that he suffered in the accident. P prevails and then P brings another action against the Ds for his personal injuries. Ds move to dismiss.

Procedure: The trial court denied Ds’ motion to dismiss.

Issue: Did the accident give rise to two separate causes of action, one for property damages and one for personal injuries?

Holding: Yes

Rationale: The court followed the minority “primary rights” view under which property damages and personal injuries are two separate and distinct types of damages. The court reasoned that the number of a plaintiff’s rights determine the number of causes of actions because a plaintiff usually acts not to punish a defendant but to preserve his own rights.

Under the majority view, all damages arising out of a single incident must be brought together as one cause of action.

Attorneys Wanted

We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. If you are interested, please contact us at info@4lawschool.com

Submit Your Case Briefs

Have you written case briefs that you want to share with our community? Get compensated for submitting them here