On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:33:23PM +0000, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> Shouldn't the replacement use shells/bash2 instead of shells/bash?
> It seems like that would be the preferred bash nowadays.
Nope, it's exactly the other way 'round: shells/bash is bash-3,
while shell/bash2 is only bash-2.
Thomas