Let's say you bet on Black, or whatever other bet selection. But let's take Black as an example.As we all know it is possible that the Black dominates and you win big.The question is:What money management/progression would you use in order to keep your winnings/profits LOW even if your bet wins often.

A strange question, since we usually want to increase profits and decrease losses, but I think this question will help us do some lateral thinking.

After a profitable session on the ECs you must flat betting on the contrary EC till a profitExample; The stats of the last 50 spins show 64% B, 34% R and 2% zero.The history board shows R-R Z -Z-Z-R-Z-R-Z-Z-R-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z now bet R till you have a profit. THis is the case if the stats show the percentage B is decreased below 64%.This method is a HG.

A good method dobbelsteen but to claim it is a HG is, I think, an overstatement . How many spins are needed when you start betting ? What is the required bank ? Can you really guarantee that it will win within that bankroll ?And how many players are prepared to wait for 50 spins before betting ?

Sorry, dobbel, but I asked a very specific question which is:What money management/progression would you use in order to keep your winnings/profits LOW even if your bet wins often.

I also offered an example of a winning sequenceWWWWLLWWWLWWWLWWWWWLWWWLWWWWWLLWL

So far, people have a great problem adjusting to this strange yet simple question and offer unrelated answers. (most of which I have deleted or moved to new threads)It is a great evidence that we are so fixated in our perceptions that we cannot think out of the box.This I believe a GREAT insight into the roulette player's mind. Most of us are stuck to a very specific way of approaching the game and can't think laterally. Too bad.

Sorry, dobbel, but I asked a very specific question which is:What money management/progression would you use in order to keep your winnings/profits LOW even if your bet wins often.

I also offered an example of a winning sequenceWWWWLLWWWLWWWLWWWWWLWWWLWWWWWLLWL

So far, people have a great problem adjusting to this strange yet simple question and offer unrelated answers. (most of which I have deleted or moved to new threads)It is a great evidence that we are so fixated in our perceptions that we cannot think out of the box.This I believe a GREAT insight into the roulette player's mind. Most of us are stuck to a very specific way of approaching the game and can't think laterally. Too bad.

I think level stakes would be a good contender . ( Is this the answer you were looking for kav ? And therefore to maximise profits we should employ some form of progression ? )

Now let me put in in a different way:There are you and another guy on a roulette table. That day the Black has a higher hit rate that Red, something like a 60% hit rate, in every 100 spins, 60 are Black.Now there comes a guy with a gun in his hand and tells you that you all should keep betting on Black and after 100 spins he will kill the guy with the most chips.What method would you use?

I can't be sure whether my way of thinking is right but if there is no limit to my bet amount i would divide my Bankroll into 40 pieces, bet on black and double my bet amount until i hit a R. Until i have reached 40 R (which will happen in 100 spins) i will have depleted my bankroll.

The question is more complicated.My long run theory tells me that after about 150 spins the ratio of the EC is nearly 1. The ratio 2/3 R/B is not likely. In this example betting black with a negative progression will bust you.