That has nothing to do with it. The mismatches as illustrated above have been happening for years. The only reason I'm posting them (again) is because Mike is denial that the site has as many bugs as are being reported. The evidence speaks for itself.

I don't dispute there are "bugs". It's an inherent feature of all software. But I use FR24 everyday and, with a few, minor exceptions, find the product usable and helpful. And Mike isn't in denial.

It seems you're determined to rubbish FR24 for some reason and want to lay it on as thick as you can, calling people "clowns" and for them to be sacked.

You've made your point, now leave Mike to investigate and report back. But if he doesn't, I can understand why.

With all due respect, I haven't seen it posted anywhere that you have been appointed as Mike's spokesperson so I'm not sure what any of this discussion has to do with you? Mike is perfectly capable of speaking for himself and he requested that people post the bugs so that is what I am doing. If the discussion here is not to your liking then may I suggest you move along to other threads where you may fnd the content there more to your liking.

That has nothing to do with it. The mismatches as illustrated above have been happening for years. The only reason I'm posting them (again) is because Mike is denial that the site has as many bugs as are being reported. The evidence speaks for itself.

No long term user would dispute that there are bugs - always have been probably always will be. FR24 may not the best product for data but it leaves other flight trackers for dead in terms of global coverage, visible aircraft and graphic rendition. If you're a keen spotter you need to use to more than one. Horses for courses.