In last week’s Grammer Pole, you voted to overwhelmingly approve the use of split infinitives. Fifty-three percent of Above the Law readers said that splitting infinitives is acceptable, even if it should be done sparingly. An additional forty percent said, “Yes. It’s great to liberally split infinitives!”

This suggests to me that ATL readers are a pragmatic bunch when it comes to language. You’re not hung up on hoary rules that don’t serve a practical purpose in communication.

I think I can guess, then, what you think of the injunction against ending a sentence with a preposition….

In grammar school — yup, they call it grammar school for a reason — nuns or nun-like instructors repeatedly told us not to end sentences with prepositions. As a general style guideline, this probably isn’t a bad idea; sentences ending with prepositions can be awkward.

Thou shalt not end a sentence with a preposition is not now and has never been a rule of English usage. It may have derived from Latin grammar, where prepositions could not end a sentence. But Latin is a dead language — keep it buried.

We should not twist our sentences into goofiness by avoiding sentence-ending prepositions. Should we write that is something about which it is not worth arguing rather than that is not worth arguing about? I think not. Even better sometimes is to avoid the preposition altogether — that is not worth discussing.

His Honor cites a familiar authority for this position: writing guru Bryan Garner, who dismisses the supposed rule against ending a sentence with a preposition as a “superstition.”

That said, the rule does raise a broader issue about legal writing, according to Judge Painter:

The problem with legal writing is not just that we shy away from ending a sentence with a preposition when it would be natural, but that we use too many prepositions.

Bryan Garner tells us that good writing uses fewer prepositions. We write docket of the court instead of the court’s docket. But the latter is much better, and it avoids a preposition. We write a distance of five miles instead of five miles. The former is simply redundant — an example of flabby writing. You can reduce the clutter in your writing by eliminating many prepositions.

No matter what the “experts” say, people will believe what they’ll believe (see, for example, climate change). So let’s take this issue to a vote:

Is it acceptable to end a sentence with a preposition?

Yes, obviously; this is not worth arguing about!

Yes, but try to avoid it.

No. This decline in standards is something up with which I will not put!

Litigation finance is a funding tool many companies are considering to help cover the fees and expenses related to major legal claims. We at Lake Whillans Litigation Finance have compiled a list of questions to help you determine if your client is a candidate for litigation finance.