self-assessment- why my name has not been mentioned in the favourite list

Many members are disappointed not see their names mentioned in the other thread being the favourite poster. I have carried out a mini research and decided to post my questionnaire and answers in order to find out why others have not been mentioned. Please keep in mind that the duration of research was only 20 mins.
Please take the self-assessment and let me know the outcome frankly.
1. the duration of your BC membership is:
a. more than 3 years
b. 2-3 years
c. 1-2 years
d. less than 1 year

2. the total number of your posts:
a. more than 4000
b. 2000-3000
c. 1000-2000
d. less than 1000

Answers:
If you have scored:
44-35 you have already been mentioned in the favourite list
34-25 you are nearly there
24-15 keep improving
14-0 needs overtime working

umpire's decisions:
1. if you have scored 44-35 but have not been mentioned yet , consider this as arrogance of BC members.
2. if you have scored less than 25 but have been mentioned once only, please consider this as a fluke or the quality of the posts wasn't the main reason.
3. if you have scored 34-25 but have been mentioned more than once, please consider this a marginal error of this assessment
4. if you have scored less than 15 but have been mentioned, probably you have been mentioned by a controversial or causioned member( got multiple ban warnings).

There are many worthy causes out there. And the list is too long. I sometimes feel guilty for a lot of things and the amount of time i waste.
Popularity, or whatever in Banglacricket, or whatever forum is definetely a joke.

I got 28 so I guess I'm nearly there!... I don't think I'll be anyone's favourite unless I personally befriend the thread starter with some pump-potti combined with the finest Keshoboti shugondhi tel...

besides it's natural in many forums where the 'big bros' (by experience, age, etc) form sort of a gang and over or underrate others..