"In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author
.....
"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First: It Is Ridiculed, Second: It Is Violently Opposed, And Third: It Is
Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

Sunday, October 31, 2010

I have been spending the last few days taking care of other business.. In the meantime, we have seen the latest laugher of a "terrorist" attack take place, and the full exposure of it as nothing more than a massive fraud. It is odd, and extremely convenient that there is a "terrorist" attack just before the US midterm elections.

Anyways, for this article, I want to concentrate on new information concerning the Global Warming fraud. I came across the following article from James Dellingpole, who writes articles for the Telegraph online news service at www.telegraph.co.uk. This newest article is called: "Warmists Plot Secretly To Kill Off The Medieval Warming Period. Again" and I am putting that entire article here for my own readers to view in its entirety:

Warmists plot secretly to kill off the Medieval Warming Period. Again

Pretend ruins of fake 12th century Viking church moved to Greenland by Booker, Delingpole, North et al last year in cynical bid to pretend the MWP actually existed

Remember how one of the great ambitions of theClimategate “scientists” was to “contain” the “putative” Medieval Warming Period? Well – guess what – they’re STILL at it.

Michael Mann, Phil Jones, Jonathan Overpeck, Eugene Wahl, Malcolm Hughes – just about anyone who’s anyone from the Climategate emails, in fact – have all been on a clandestine boondoggle to sunny Portugal, there to conspire how best to obliterate that embarrassing and inconvenient period of bounteous warmth between around 900 AD and 1280 AD known as the MWP.

Anthony Watts has the full story. The bit that interests me most is the size of their carbon footprint? And even more so, who actually grant-funded all these shysters to fly to Portugal for their weekend reality-denial fest? And even more, more so if it was us – which of course it was, via our governments, the UN and the EU – why we can’t have our money back NOW.

Wattsy’s site was responsible for another classic this week which you must read if you haven’t already: Willis Eschenbach’s magisterial and hilarious essay Eight tenths of a degree? Think of the Grandchildren! I met Eschenbach at Heartland: terrifyingly loud shirts and an aura of tousled levity and almost childlike sweetness which might give you the impression that he’s just a barmy eccentric. Make no mistake, though, this man is a genius. I’ll reprint the opening paragraphs to give you a taste:

James Hansen and others say that we owe it to our Grandchildren to get this climate question right. Hansen says “Grandchildren” with a capital G when he speaks of them so I will continue the practice. I mean, for PR purposes, Grandchildren with a capital letter outrank even Puppies with a capital letter, and I can roll with that.

In any case Hansen got me to thinking about the world of 2050. Many, likely even most people reading this in 2010 will have Grandchildren in 2050. Heck, I might have some myself. So I started to consider the world we will leave our Grandchildren in 2050.

In a recent post here on WUWT, Thomas Fuller floated aproposal that we adopt a couple of degrees as the expected temperature rise over the century. He says in the comments to his thread that

I think we owe it to the people of the world to give them an idea of how much warming they can expect, so they can plan their buildings, businesses, roads and lives. They matter. They don’t care how much of it is due to CO2 or how much is rebound from a LIA due to forcings we don’t understand. They don’t. They probably shouldn’t.

We have temperature rises that we can almost trust from 1958 that show a trend of about 2 degrees for this century if things go on.

To start with, I don’t think we owe people anything more than the scientific truth as we understand it. And if we don’t understand it, as in the case of what the climate may be like over the rest of this century, we definitely owe it to the people to simply say “We don’t know”. Those three little words, so hard to say … so no, we don’t owe people a number if we don’t have one.

Read the rest here. If you haven’t the time let me summarise his truly scary conclusion: that by 2050 our planet might possibly have warmed by….

Eight tenths of a degree!

How will our grandchildren cope?

Oh and one other piece you should definitely read. This one in today’s Telegraph by Charles Moore on Britain’s energy policy. It’s bang on the nail and highly welcome. Possibly I’m being unfair when I say “joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth…” – Charles was never THAT much of a believer in the “Consensus”. But I don’t half find myself in agreement with this commenter Raffie:

At last! Somebody (other than Booker and Delingpole) in the mainstream media has finally woken up to the fact that the government is inflicting one of the biggest bills in history on us; (£18 Bn a year for forty years) for 44,000 25% efficient wind turbines ………. at a time when the country is over its head in debt and people are about to lose jobs left, right and centre.

NTS Notes: It does seem that the scam artists behind the entire Global Warming farce are definitely not giving up on their criminal pursuit of personal wealth and pure GREED.

Again, history does not lie, and the Global Warming cult still cannot figure out how to hide the facts that during the middle ages, or roughly 1000 years ago, there was a long period of warmer weather in which regions around the planet were much warmer than even today, and such as Greenland and Iceland were actually free of snow and ice. This period of warming flies in the face of all of the Global Warming cultists' "historical records" and defies their claims on how the planet is warming due to man made influences.

Lets not get fooled again. We must let everyone know about this latest attempt to get their criminal Global Warming agenda off and running in their evil pursuit of "Green initiatives" and "cap and trade" legislations that will bleed more money out of taxpayers. This is again nothing more than a fraud, a scam, and a massive swindle.

Friday, October 29, 2010

We all know by now that Israel, with its puppets in America, did the attacks of 9-11. That is now clearly fact. However, with the total control of our Mainstream media outlets by these Zionist Jewish criminals, that truth is still hidden from the majority of people on the planet.

However, as more and more people are waking up to the truth about that murderous event that cost the lives of 3000 innocent Americans, the real truth is slowly leaking out, and more and more these criminals are now showing their desperation in trying to keep the truth bottled up. Such is the case with the recent comments made by Australian Trades Union leader, Kevin Bracken, where he questioned the facts behind the 9-11 attacks, and his comments were posted in the Australian News Herald online service (and a recent article right here). Since then, Kevin Bracken has been under relentless attacks from the controlled media, and the Zionist Jewish controlled Australian Government itself.

Now, I want to present the following excellent video from Alan Lawson, entitled: "Aussie Trades Unionist Exposes 9-11 Cover-up", in which Kevin Bracken was interviewed by radio host, Jon Faine, about his comments on 9-11. I really recommend that everyone listen closely to this amazing interview, where Jon Faine shows his true allegiance to his Jewish tribesmen and tries to coverup their criminal actions of 9-11 by blasting Kevin Bracken for wanting the investigations reopened! Here is that video:

NTS Notes: As I stated, Jon Faine is Jewish and he knows full well that his criminal fellow Jewish tribesmen did the 9-11 attacks. He also knows that in his position in the Australian media it is his job, as a member of this criminal tribe, to coverup and to put out as much disinformation about 9-11 when ever possible. He also knows that as a member of the criminal tribe, his job is to insult and to label anyone who questions the attacks of 9-11 as a "whacko" or "nut".

This video clearly shows, by the criminal actions of this Jon Faine agent of disinformation, how these criminals are using their control of the media to prevent all truths from coming out, while they continue their pursuit of world domination as laid out in their most evil Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. If anyone takes the time to read the Protocols, there is an entire section on how it is essential for the Zionist Jews to control ALL of the media. By their control of the media, they control all messages and news conveyed to the unsuspecting Goyim. The Protocols says clearly that this is necessary to keep us all in the dark and away from the truths about their evil nature, and their evil criminalities!

I am again asking all of my Australian readers to spread this important video to your fellow countrymen, and to do as Alan Lawson says at the end of the video and go after your own Government Zionist controlled shills and have them request that the 9-11 attacks be reopened for full unbiased independent investigation!

Eventually the truth about 9-11 will be known to everyone, and people such as Kevin Bracken will be haled as heroes for having the courage to pursue the truth.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

I and others in the blogosphere have been following the actions of the criminal state of Israel for a very long time. There is no greater danger to true peace in the Middle East today than the continuing aspirations of the Zionist state of Israel for its pursuit of the total control of Palestine. The eventual goal of Zionist Israel is to make Palestine itself an exclusive Jewish only state, and in the process have absolutely no future for the true heirs to the region, which are the Palestinians themselves!

To again make people aware of the true dangers of Zionism, and why it is important that we all oppose its criminal aspirations, I want to present the following article from Foreign Policy Journal, at www.foreignpolicyjournal.com, entitled: "Four Reasons Why Americans Should Oppose Zionism". Here is that important article right here for my own readers to view:

Four Reasons Why Americans Should Oppose Zionism

by Steven Salaita

August 23, 2010

Israel has been subject to some bad publicity recently. In 2008-09, it launched a brutal military campaign in the Gaza Strip that killed over 400 Palestinian children. In May, 2010, bumbling Israeli commandos murdered nine nonviolence activists on the relief flotilla Mavi Marmara. It only got worse for Israel when it was revealed that soldiers stole and sold personal items such as laptops from the ship. Last week, former Israeli soldier Eden Abergil posted photos onto Facebook showing her preening in front of blindfolded and despondent Palestinian prisoners, in some instances mocking those prisoners with sexual undertones. The photos were part of an album entitled “IDF—the best time of my life.”

While Abergil’s pictures may not seem as abhorrent as the Gaza and Mavi Marmara brutality—Abergil, for her part, described her behavior as nonviolent and free of contempt—all three actions are intimately connected. First of all, we must dispel the notion that Abergil’s photos are nonviolent. As with the Abu Ghraib debacle, a sexualized and coercive humiliation is being visited on the bodies of powerless, colonized, and incarcerated subjects, which by any reasonable principle is a basal form of violence; there is also the obvious physical violence of Palestinians being bound and blindfolded, presumably in or on their way to prisons nobody will confuse with the Mandarin Oriental.

More important, these recent episodes merely extend an age-old list of Israeli crimes and indignities that illuminate a depravity in the Zionist enterprise itself. What is noteworthy about Israel’s three recent escapades is that more and more people are starting to pay attention to its crimes and indignities. In so doing, more and more people are questioning the origin and meaning of Zionism—that is, the very idea of a legally ethnocentric Israel.

I would like to address this piece to those who have undertaken such questioning or to those who are prepared to initiate it. I would urge you not to limit your critique of Israel only to its errors of judgment or its perceived excesses; it is more productive to challenge the ideology and practice of Zionism itself. There is no noble origin or beautiful ideal to which the wayward Jewish state must return; such yearnings are often duplicitous mythmaking or romanticized nostalgia. Zionists always intended to ethnically cleanse Palestinians, a strategy they carried out and continue to pursue with horrifying efficiency.

Likewise, Zionism was always a colonialist movement, one that relied on the notions of divine entitlement and civilizational superiority that justified previous settlement projects in South Africa, Algeria, and North America. Zionism, by virtue of its exclusionary outlook and ethnocentric model of citizenship, is on its own a purveyor of fundamental violence. The bad PR to which Israel sometimes is subject today is a reflection of changed media dynamics, not a worsening of Israel’s behavior.

The 2008-09 Gaza invasion, the attack on the Mavi Marmara, and Abergil’s Facebook photos aren’t anomalous or extraordinary. They are the invariable result of a Zionist ideology that cannot help but view Palestinian Muslims and Christians as subhuman, no matter how ardently its liberal champions assert that Zionism is a liberation movement. Zionism has the unfortunate effect of proclaiming that one group of people should have access to certain rights from which another group of people is excluded. There is nothing defensible in this proposition.

Here, then, are four reasons why Americans (and all other humans regardless of race or religion) should oppose Zionism:

1. Zionism is unethical and immoral: Because Zionists claim access to land and legal rights that directly obviate the same access to an indigenous community, it operates from within an idea of belonging that is cruel and archaic. Israel bases its primary criterion for citizenship on religious identity. Imagine having your religion on your driver’s license. And imagine having limited access to freeways, farmland, family, education, employment, and foreign travel because the religion by which the state has chosen to identify you is legally marginalized. Such is the daily reality of the Palestinian people.

2. Zionism is racist: This claim isn’t the same as saying that all Zionists are racist. I would make a distinction between the categories of “Zionist” and “Zionism.” However, inherent in the practice of Zionism is a reliance on racialist judgments about who can fully participate in the benefits and practices of a national community. Many Zionists view themselves merely as supporting freedom and safety for Jewish people. I would suggest that people who identify themselves as Zionist look more closely at the ideology they support. Such freedom and safety, both of which are in fact mythologies, come at the direct expense of people confined to Bantustans and refugee camps.

3. Zionism contravenes the geopolitical interests of the United States: Many Americans have heard former Israel Prime Minister Ehud Olmert boast that he once pulled George W. Bush off the dais while Bush was giving a speech, or more recently current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announcing that “America is something that can be easily moved.” Israel costs the United States billions of dollars in direct aid and in bribe money to Jordan and Egypt for their docility. Israel also is the main reason for disgruntlement about American foreign policy in the Arab and Muslim Worlds. I raise this point with some hesitation because I believe all citizens of the United States should challenge and not celebrate American geopolitical interests. I would also point out that Zionism’s narrative of salvation and redemption resonates deeply among Americans because of the United States’ origin and continued presence as a nation of settler colonists. In the end, America itself needs to be decolonized and the vast sums of money that support the imperial projects Israel so brazenly exemplifies need to be directed toward the well-being of those who pay the government its taxes.

4. Zionism is fundamentally incompatible with democracy: Israel, as a result, is undemocratic and will be as long as it uses religious identity as the operating criterion of citizenship. We hear much in the United States about Islam being incompatible with democracy, a belief that is historically untrue and that elides the massive military and monetary support the United States provides to the assortment of dictators and plutocrats that rule much of the Arab World. Neoconservative and mainstream commentators both evoke Israel in opposition to Islam as a symbol of democratic achievement, but in reality Israel performs one of the most barbaric forms of oppression today in the West Bank and Gaza Strip (and discriminates against the Palestinian citizens of Israel).

The alternative media engendered by new technology have allowed more people to witness the unremitting violence that has been Israel’s stock in trade for decades. Many consumers of this information and these images believe that Israel is guilty of excess when a simpler explanation exists: Israel is acting out the requisites of an exclusionary and inherently violent ideology.

These days all it takes is a little braggadocio from an ex-soldier such as Eden Abergil to so perfectly symbolize the callousness of Zionist colonization. Ten years ago, the Israeli government’s lies about the IDF killings aboard the Mavi Marmara would have been unchallenged by gruesome cell phone footage. Nobody these days could have stopped the images of white phosphorous exploding and spreading over the Gaza Strip from being aired; Israelis themselves were foolish enough to capture Jewish children writing messages on soon-to-be-launched missiles.

Americans now have all the evidence they need for a reasonable and morally-sound conclusion, that Zionism produces a cruelty and truculence that they bankroll with their taxes and legitimize with either silence or consent. As a result, I am not arguing that Americans should reassess their level of support for Israel. I am arguing that Americans should oppose Zionism altogether. Perhaps in this way we might begin the long and difficult process of redeeming our own nation of its imperial sins.

NTS Notes: As my title to this article states, it is not just Americans that should oppose this most evil program of hate, but the entire world should as well!

As stated in this article, Zionism is a criminal movement based on racism, hatred, lack of ethics, and immorality. It is truly shocking that in this world where people are learning to try to live in peace and harmony that such evil does exist!

Please pass this important article around to everyone and make everyone aware of the true dangers of Zionism to all of humanity.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Osama bin Laden is dead. He died of natural causes, primarily from kidney failure, in the mountain region of Tora Bora that lies between Pakistan and Afghanistan, sometime in early December, 2001. This fact was told in much of the Middle East press, and even some European newspapers. However, thanks to the Zionist Jews who control the press in both the United States and Canada, Osama bin Laden's death was purposely never put out over the mass media sources here. The result is that people primarily in North America are still under the false assumption that Osama bin Laden is alive and well and living in some cave somewhere in either Afghanistan or Pakistan!

Now it seems that the criminal Zionist Jewish agents at SITE are at it again, with their newest phony "Bin Laden" tape. According to this article, from www.activistpost.com, the dead guy is now threatening France! Here is that article for my own readers to view:

CAIRO — Al-Jazeera television reports that it has received an audio tape by al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden threatening to kill French citizens to avenge their country's support for the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan and a new law that will ban face-covering Muslim veils.

"It is a simple equation: If you kill, you will be killed," bin Laden was quoted as saying.

The establishment appears to be throwing all of their manufactured bogeymen at the public this week. Perhaps they are leading up to an attack that will distract the French people from protesting their thieving government.

NTS Notes: Keeping the lie of Osama bin Laden alive is by design. The criminals perpetrating this lie will continue to try to use this dead guy as a propaganda weapon of fear to primarily get the dumbed down American citizens to support the evil and very fraudulent "war on terror" and to support wars for Israel.

The facts are simple readers. This latest audio tape is as fraudulent as all the other ones.... It is also amazing that they even mention the just as phony "Adam Gadahn" in this article. People must be aware that this "Adam Gadahn" character is another big phony! "Adam Gadahn"'s real name is Adam Pearlman. Adam Pearlman is a Zionist Jewish Mossad operative working in the just as fraudulent and very phony "Al Qaeda terrorist" organization!

This is another laughable chapter in my "Files Of Absurdity" again. I am waiting for the day that people finally turn against SITE, the US Government, and other criminal groups, for perpetuating these lies. That day is long overdue...

America is right now at a crisis point in its existence as a nation. Right now, there is a growing movement to have the entire financial institution, and the criminal Federal Reserve system itself, investigated for their roles in the so called Mortage Foreclosure scandal, now being called "ForeclosureGate" by many sites in the blogosphere. It is truly amazing that the Zionist Jewish controlled Mainstream Media is absolutely refusing to tell the American public that the entire system could unravel due to exposure on how deep the fraud truly is!

It troubles even myself sometimes as to how the United States could have allowed itself to get to this point in its history. The fact is that the entire debt based monetary system in the United States was doomed to failure the moment the criminal Federal Reserve system was given the power to issue money at interest back in 1913! Now some 97 years later, the Federal debt accumulated by this private banking ponzi scheme has ruined the nation!

For this article, I want to turn to one of the greatest Presidents in US History, Thomas Jefferson, who warned the American public at the turn of the 19th century about the dangers of Private Banking. I want to present the following article from www.dailybail.com, entitled: "Can We Party Like Its 1776 And Just Start Over? Thomas Jefferson's Top Ten Quotes On Money And Banking" for all of my own readers to view in its entirety. Thomas Jefferson's words were never heeded, and now America may be paying the ultimate price for its ignorance of these facts:

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale." --Thomas Jefferson to John Taylor, 1816.

"Everything predicted by the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is now coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by the deluge of bank paper. It is cruel that such revolutions in private fortunes should be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead of employing their capital, if any they have, in manufactures, commerce, and other useful pursuits, make it an instrument to burden all the interchanges of property with their swindling profits, profits which are the price of no useful industry of theirs." --Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814.

"The art and mystery of banks... is established on the principle that 'private debts are a public blessing.' That the evidences of those private debts, called bank notes, become active capital, and aliment the whole commerce, manufactures, and agriculture of the United States. Here are a set of people, for instance, who have bestowed on us the great blessing of running in our debt about two hundred millions of dollars, without our knowing who they are, where they are, or what property they have to pay this debt when called on."

"The treasury, lacking confidence in the country, delivered itself bound hand and foot to bold and bankrupt adventurers and bankers pretending to have money, whom it could have crushed at any moment…These jugglers were at the feet of government. For it was not, any confidence in their frothy bubbles, but the lack of all other money, which induced…people to take their paper" -- Thomas Jefferson, October 1815 letter to (former) Treasury Secretary, Albert Gallatin.

"I own it to be my opinion, that good will arise from the destruction of our credit. I see nothing else which can restrain our disposition to luxury, and to the change of those manners which alone can preserve republican government. As it is impossible to prevent credit, the best way would be to cure its ill effects by giving an instantaneous recovery to the creditor. This would be reducing purchases on credit to purchases for ready money. A man would then see a prison painted on everything he wished, but had not ready money to pay for." --Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1786.

"If the debt which the banking companies owe be a blessing to anybody, it is to themselves alone, who are realizing a solid interest of eight or ten per cent on it. As to the public, these companies have banished all our gold and silver medium, which, before their institution, we had without interest, which never could have perished in our hands, and would have been our salvation now in the hour of war; instead of which they have given us two hundred million of froth and bubble, on which we are to pay them heavy interest, until it shall vanish into air... We are warranted, then, in affirming that this parody on the principle of 'a public debt being a public blessing,' and its mutation into the blessing of private instead of public debts, is as ridiculous as the original principle itself. In both cases, the truth is, that capital may be produced by industry, and accumulated by economy; but jugglers only will propose to create it by legerdemain tricks with paper." --Thomas Jefferson to John W. Eppes, 1813.

"The Bank of the United States is one of the most deadly hostilities existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution. An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?" --Thomas Jefferson to Albert Gallatin, 1803.

Regulating Banking Institutions

"The principle of rotation... in the body of [bank] directors... breaks in upon the espirit de corps so apt to prevail in permanent bodies; it gives a chance for the public eye penetrating into the sanctuary of those proceedings and practices, which the avarice of the directors may introduce for their personal emolument, and which the resentments of excluded directors, or the honesty of those duly admitted, might betray to the public; and it gives an opportunity at the end of the year, or at other periods, of correcting a choice, which on trial, proves to have been unfortunate." --Thomas Jefferson to Albert Gallatin, 1803.

Paper Speculation

"A spirit... of gambling in our public paper has seized on too many of our citizens, and we fear it will check our commerce, arts, manufactures, and agriculture, unless stopped." --Thomas Jefferson to William Carmichael, 1791.

"Our public credit is good, but the abundance of paper has produced a spirit of gambling in the funds, which has laid up our ships at the wharves as too slow instruments of profit, and has even disarmed the hand of the tailor of his needle and thimble. They say the evil will cure itself. I wish it may; but I have rarely seen a gamester cured, even by the disasters of his vocation." --Thomas Jefferson to Gouverneur Morris, 1791.

NTS Notes: As I stated already, the United States has never learned from the brutal facts about debt based monetary systems. History has shown that every country that brought in such an evil system eventually collapsed, or faced permanent ruination!

The facts are simple: Money must be only printed by Governments, and absolutely DEBT FREE! Giving criminal private Zionist Jewish bankers the exclusive power to print money basically hands the entire nation over to these criminals. Debt slavery, based on Usury, of a nation's citizens to these private bankers is indeed SLAVERY!

There is a famous quote that comes into play in all of this: "If we do not learn from history, then we are doomed to repeat it!" This is so true when it comes to a once great nation, the United States, not learning from the history of ruination of great nations due to crushing debt. Thomas Jefferson knew the dangers as well, and even his own words were not heeded!

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

The war in Afghanistan is a lost cause, and people must demand that the troops be withdrawn and brought home immediately. The entire war is being fought for the most evil cause of the Opium/Heroin drug empire, and to make sure that the Afghan Opium poppy fields stay in full production for drug addicts around the world. This puts America and its NATO allies on the wrong and the evil side in this war. Sadly readers, this is fact!

This war has been going on for 9 years now, and the question has become: "Is there any possibility of a military victory in Afghanistan? " Well, according to this new article from www.conservativeedge.com, it seems that even the US special envoy to Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke, is admitting that a military victory in Afghanistan is impossible! Here is that article for my readers to view here:

October 24, 2010

Categories:

Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan, is downplaying news reports of American “peace talks” with Taliban leaders, but he acknowledges that a “pure military victory” in Afghanistan “is not possible.”

“I’m not in the spin patrol of the people who are giddy with optimism on the op-ed pages of some papers, or the people who say it’s another Vietnam and it’s hopeless. It’s certainly not another Vietnam, ... and it is certainly not hopeless,” Holbrooke said during an interview aired Sunday on CNN’s “Fareed Zakaria GPS.”

“But anyone who doesn’t recognize what a daunting task it is is misleading. And the American public should understand that this is not going to be solved overnight. It is going to be a difficult struggle," he said. "It has a political component. We are not trying to win this war militarily, … but some kind of political element to this is essential and we are looking at every aspect of this. We are talking to all our other nations about it.”

Zakaria interrupted, asking: “What do mean when you say you don’t want to win this militarily?”

“I didn’t say we don’t want to win this militarily. I said we can’t win it militarily because a pure military victory is not possible, as Gen. [David] Petraeus and his colleagues have repeatedly said,” Holbrooke replied, adding that both Pakistani and Taliban leaders need to be engaged on a political level.

“Everybody understands that the Taliban is part of the fabric of recent Afghan political life,” Holbrooke said. “They were a government that controlled the country until 9/11.”

Earlier in the interview, he warned the media against calling the discussions "peace talks" or "negotiations," since the Taliban are a loosely organized insurgency.

"A peace deal requires agreements, and you don't make agreements with your friends, you make agreements with your enemies. But in this particular case, ... there is no clear single address that you go to," Holbrooke said. "There's no Ho Chi Minh; there's no Palestinian Authority."

NTS Notes: Is it just me... Or does Richard Holbrooke come across with some of his comments as a blithering idiot? Richard Holbrooke says that the war is "certainly not another Vietnam, and it is certainly not hopeless"... I wonder who he is trying to kid here?

It seems again that the US cannot admit to the fact that the Taliban is clearly winning this war. This war has become America's newest Vietnam, and the results will be exactly the same as in that conflict, with America withdrawing from this lost war with soldiers coming home beaten, broken, or in body bags!

Again, lets end this lost cause and demand our governments bring the troops home, now!

A few months ago, I attacked the so called WikiLeaks documents as nothing more than disinformation. At the time, I came to the conclusion because no where in the 92000 BS documents was the criminal state of Israel fingered for any involvement in the war against Iraq, or the subsequent attacks on its citizens, and the torturing of prisoners. Proof has shown that the entire war on Iraq was launched for Israel, and their agents were, and are still, heavily involved in the occupational forces.

Now, I want to present a new article, from the website: Sign of the Times, at www.sott.net, that shows definitive proof that the entire WikiLeaks documents and entire site is a massive sham and fraud. In this article that I am presenting here, the founder of "WikiLeaks", Julian Assange, finally exposes himself as a Zionist Jewish shill, by saying that the attacks of 9-11 were NOT a conspiracy! Here is that article:

There are not many journalists who, when you ask them if they are being followed by the CIA, say "We have surveillance events from time to time." Actually it's not a question I've ever asked before, and Julian Assange does not call himself a journalist.

But the answer is typical of this 41-year-old former computer-hacker: cryptic, dispassionate, and faintly self-important.

As the founder of Wikileaks - a website that publishes millions of documents, from military intelligence to internal company memos and has, in four years, exposed more secrets than many newspapers have in a century - Assange has become the pin-up of web-age investigative journalists. The US has wanted him for questioning since March, after he posed a video showing an American helicopter attack that left several Iraqi civilians and two Reuters journalists dead.

Understandably, he now avoids the US, and keeps his movements secret, though it's thought he operates out of Sweden and is spending time in Iceland, where a change in the law is creating a libel-free haven for journalists. But if the CIA spooks wanted him that badly, couldn't they have turned up, as a hundred adoring student journalists did, to hear him talk at the Centre for Investigative Journalism 10 days ago?

Perhaps it's just as well they didn't, as Assange is not a natural public speaker. He is more at home trawling data or decrypting the codes that mask it. His philosophy is that the more a government wants to keep something secret, the more reason to expose it.

No journalist could argue with his essential belief in shining a light on malpractice, but shouldn't governments be entitled to keep some secrets? "Sure," he says when we speak after his talk, "That doesn't mean we and other press organizations should suffer under coercion."

What if publishing a document would threaten national security? "This phrase is so abused. Dick Cheney justified torture with it. Give me an example." What about the movement of US troops? Would he publish a document that jeopardized their safety? "We'd have to think about it." So that's a yes? "It's not a yes. If that fit into our editorial criteria - which it might, if it was an extremely good movement - then we'd have to look at whether that needed a harm minimization procedure. We'd be totally happy to consider jeopardizing the initiation of a war, or the action of war. Absolutely."

He may speak like a robot, and have a politician's knack at ducking straight answers, but in the flesh he could be a forgotten member of Crowded House, all ripped jeans and crumpled jacket, his distinguished white hair framing a youthful face. His grungy look ties in with his outsider status: he has a deep-rooted mistrust of authority. It has been speculated this comes from a youthful brush with the family courts after he divorced the mother of his son, though little is really known about his early life.

His obsession with secrecy, both in others and maintaining his own, lends him the air of a conspiracy theorist. Is he one? "I believe in facts about conspiracies," he says, choosing his words slowly. "Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there's enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news."

What about 9/11? "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." What about the Bilderberg conference? "That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their meeting notes."

Assange likes to see Wikileaks as a neutral platform for distributing information, and fends off criticism by saying it always follows its openly stated policies. But no news organisation is free from personal input, as he reveals when talking of Bilderberg, a shadowy annual conference of the influential. "I understand the philosophical rationale for having Chatham House rules among people in power, but the corrupting nature, in the case of Bilderberg, probably outweighs the benefits. When powerful people meet together in secret, it tends to corrupt."

Spending time with Assange, it's hard not to start believing that dark forces are at work. According to him, everyone's emails are being read. For that reason, he encourages anyone planning to leak a document to post it the old fashioned way, to his PO Box. It's ironic that an organisation bent on blowing secrets is itself so secretive, but Wikileaks couldn't operate without reliable sources. Except that, amazingly, Wikileaks does not verify them. "We don't verify our sources, we verify the documents. As long as they are bona fide, it doesn't matter where they come from. We would rather not know."

After we talk, he is off to a safe house for the night and after that, who knows? He never stays in one place more than two nights. Is that because the CIA wants to kill him? "Is it in the CIA's interest to assassinate me? Maybe. But who would do it?" Isn't he brave to appear in public? "Courage is an intellectual mastery of fear," he says. "It's not that you don't have fear, you just manage your risks intelligently."

Comment: SOTT.net apologises for accidentally deleting the comments below this article. We will instead try to reconstruct the points made by readers.

Julian Assange's comments regarding 9/11 stick out like a sore thumb given that this "whistleblowers' whistleblower" is now feted with the title of "the most dangerous man alive". The reality is that the CIA could nullify the threat posed by Assange and his operation any which way it wants. Assange dismissing 9/11 as a "false conspiracy" strongly suggests that that hasn't happened yet because he is useful to the PTB in the form of controlled opposition. WikiLeaks is beginning to look like a Protocol 12 operation on steroids.

Protocol 12, Control of the Press - Protocols of the Pathocrats

In the front rank will stand organs of an official character. They will always stand guard over our interests, and therefore their influence will be comparatively insignificant.

In the second rank will be the semi-official organs, whose part it will be to attack the tepid and indifferent.

In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.

We have to wonder now if Bradley Manning, the unfortunate US soldier who showed his cards by sending Wikileaks the murderous helicopter gunship video (an everyday occurrence throughout the US occupation of Iraq) and is now facing indefinite incarceration, has been set up as an example to other potential military whistleblowers: dissent and we will have you 'extraordinarily renditioned' then lock you away for good.

NTS Notes: Readers, it does make sense when you think of the Zionist Jewish criminal twisted mindset. They want to control both sides of the fight and therefore control the opposition. The WikiLeaks documents were sent out as disinformation to send people down the wrong path purposely by continuing to cover for the real perpetrators of the crimes in Iraq, and hide Israel's direct involvement in that war.

Now we can face the truth that WikiLeaks is a fraud, because the founder of WikiLeaks is finally exposed as the Zionist Jewish stooge he really is by trying now to cover for the Israeli murders of 9-11!

As this article states, it is written right in their most evil Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion for the absolute necessity to control both sides of any conflict, control the press, and therefore control the message. This is exactly what the phony WikiLeaks is all about, and its time for people to face this truth.

The Best Sites Exposing The Truth About Israel's 9:11 Attacks On America

Best Sites For Exposing The Apollo Moon Landings Hoax!

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

About Myself

Canadian male, age 57..(Hard to believe I am that old..)
Sickened by the lies of history, and how our education system has ruined and failed our childrens' minds, I decided it was time to take a stand and put up real articles of truthful information.
Willing to fight to see truth come out, and to have the true criminals on our planet exposed for their crimes against humanity.
I am in this for the truth and where ever the truth leads me!
********************************************************
Northerntruthseeker is fully responsible for all content in this blog. If any errors or omissions are deemed necessary for correction of material, it will be placed into the articles affected, and notice will be put up for all readers. Northerntruthseeker will never accept money, personal gifts, or any threats, given for any material posted in this blog.
The information articles in this blog are free for everyone to take and spread to others.
In these times of uncertainty, people deserve the truth no matter how harsh it may be!