Main menu

Post navigation

Data were analysed using the Graph-Pad Prism 5 program (GraphPad

Data were analysed using the Graph-Pad Prism 5 program (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and expressed as the mean ± SEM. The means between two groups were analysed by unpaired t-test, and significant difference was taken at selleck screening library P

overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% picric acid and 0.1% glutaraldehyde. After post-fixation with 1% OsO4, the samples were dehydrated and embedded in durcupan as above. Random fragments of the samples were cut into ultrathin sections, then stained with lead citrate as above and photographed Entinostat in vivo in a JEM 1010 electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) at a magnification of 20 000×. The percentages of mitochondrial profiles in cell fragments among all the mitochondria were calculated in five random micrographs and then averaged. In our light and electron microscopic analyses of the distribution of CB1 in the developing and adult mouse brain, we utilized:

(i) a sensitive method of immunoperoxidase reaction with DAB-Ni as a chromogen; and (ii) a precise antigen location pre-embedding ultra-small gold immunolabeling procedure with silver amplification. This enabled the detection of two hitherto unknown patterns of mitochondrial binding of anti-CB1 (C-terminus) sera. One population of Dimethyl sulfoxide the immunopositive mitochondria, designated as ‘type 1’, contained DAB-Ni immunoreaction end-product on the outer membrane and in the cristae (Figs 1A, B and H, 2B and C, and 3C). This location of antigen on the outer surface of the mitochondrial membrane

was confirmed by immunogold labeling (Fig. 1C and D), which very much resembles the immunolabeling recently demonstrated in the work of Benard et al. (2012). Although the staining of the cristae was less intense and below the limit of detection with the immunogold method, additional analysis (see below) suggested that it is, in fact, highly specific. The other type of immunopositive mitochondria, designated ‘type 2’, contained the antigen within the matrix; a finding also confirmed by immunogold labeling (Figs 1E, F and I, 2B and C, and 3D). The sera to different fragments of the C-terminus of CB1, for example L15 and L31 (but not the NH-terminus), produced similar mitochondrial immunolabeling (Fig. 2), but most of our experiments were performed using anti-CB1-L31 sera (see below). Patterns of mitochondrial immunolabeling with anti-CB1-L31 sera were encountered both in embryos (Fig. 1) and in adult mice (Fig. 3). The specificity of these immunolabeling patterns is supported by our data showing that pre-absorption of the anti-CB1 sera with the peptide (L31) abrogated the binding (Fig. 3E).