i understand why you'd be bummed but this is a team with a lot and could use more picks to improve the roster AND the difference in value from the mid teens to the late 1st is very comparable. For a team that is still built to run the ball, i'm not sure how comfortable i'd be with ivory and goodson as my '1-2 punch'.

Poorly worded on my part. I'd personally be disappointed with passing on Tavon just because I like him a lot as a player, but I've got no issue with the trade down. The Jets obviously could use more picks.

I don't know that they're really built to run the ball either. With Marty Mornhinwig running the offense this year I'd imagine they'd like to move to being a more passing oriented team, the issue there is obviously the quarterback position but I don't know that the intent is really "ground and pound anymore".

I actually like Franklin a lot as a scheme fit and wouldn't be particularly comfortable with those two getting the bulk of carries either. But I don't know that they'd pay Goodson a couple million a year and trade a 5th for Ivory with as much as they need picks to have either be a third back. Just don't think it's realistic that they take a back at all, let alone in the first round, with all the needs they have and their investment in those two guys.

TACKLE,
DT is one of the few spots we don't need to address early. We signed Desmond Bryant, have big Phil Taylor at nose and Rubin at the other end spot. Further, we have Billy Wynn and John Hughes, both of which provide rock-solid depth. It just doesn't make any sense.

Tavon Austin in that circumstance is the way to go, he could help Weed achieve a year of competence.

I wouldn't be sir prized if he passed McCoy on the depth chart. I think he might have a better arm and accurate arm then him from the highlights I thought. He also got some wheels too help us prepare for QB's as Wilson , RG3 and other runners etc.