Browsed byMonth: November 2010

The government proposed a fiscal policy and now they want to review, among other aspects related to Research, Development and Innovation (R + D + I) so as to increase investment in technology as an element of competitiveness compared to the cost and salaries production. Which is detrimental to employment. Given this evidence experts from government economic policy intended to help create alternative employment, which is to reiterate a fracasoa after another, because employment is created by the market itself in the functioning of the economy, therefore we must ensure that it works. What happens is that the economic growth and does not create jobs, but can be performed the same function with the Basic Income, as we will see later. T subsidy policy has failed because industries leads to open temporarily to receive the grants.

This is already happening on a widespread basis in the agricultural sector, making the sector dependent on European aid, the CAP. In December 2004, the Regional Association of Municipalities Mineworkers (ARMI) was forced to return 328. 000 for irregular management of the aid received. What really was a support to modernize the sector, has become dependent on an end of most family-type farms. The new proposal the government in the industrial sector is to be returned if those subsidies that will receive them. Which will cripple job creation even more. A n example is the case with the State Industrial Holdings Company (SEPI) has spent in the group Izar 13o6 million euros to keep employees who have nothing to do.

Yesterday, speaking with people from IU – which I do a lot, not going to believe, “I realized something startling, not that people connect more with UI are against the vast majority of policies are being out from the central government, which do not share is how they are doing. A clear demonstration of what I saw yesterday in the Congress. At six hours after an agreement reached between the left represented in Parliament, PSOE – IU, to raise the tax rate on higher incomes, gradually rectify and make the deduction of 400 euros to 2,500 euros aid per child and even modify the taxation of foreign elite athletes, now set at 24%, “to prevent manifest abuses, had to withdraw the proposal because the Members of IU, Gaspar Llamazares, and Herrera, said odd to vote setting the budget expenditure ceiling for 2010.

The excuse of the deputies of the regional financing UI is (…?) – could have been anything else that, like, I would have done better. The funny part is that this arrangement meant more taxes for higher incomes, new taxes related to the environment and the rectification of aid and tax credits that currently exist linear. If, on the one hand, the budget agreement was a left turn in the forms, the truth is that setting the spending ceiling is absolutely necessary in these times of crisis, regardless of the vaunted regional financing. This is not to set the spending ceiling is more or less left, it is an excuse as any to torpedo it. .