The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government.
Read our disclaimer for details.

Pain will be assessed every day by patient using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS. VAS scores will be compared between 2 groups(continuous or programmable flow). We want to demonstrate the superiority of intrathecal analgesia obtained through programmable flow compared to continuous flow.

Using Visual Analog Scale's score, we want to demonstrate the superiority of intrathecal analgesia compared to previous treatment (pain is assessed through VAS within 4 days before inclusion).

Adverse Events assessment. [ Time Frame: every month ]

We want to demonstrate a reduction of adverse events related to intrathecal analgesia compared to the previous treatment and to compare the two delivery systems.

Adverse events due to morphine (6 types) will be scored according to 4 levels, then the sum of these scores will constitute an adverse event severity index ranging from 0 to 18. This index will be compared between the 2 arms and will also be compared to baseline values before introduction of intrathecal analgesia.

Patient's performance status improvement. [ Time Frame: At 1 month ]

We want to demonstrate improvement of the patient's performance status during intrathecal analgesia compared to the previous treatment and to compare the two delivery systems.

Incidence and types of complications. [ Time Frame: every month. ]

We want to compare the incidence and type of complications (infectious, morphine-related and co-analgesic treatments-related, due to the intrathecal catheter, to the implantable pump) between the two delivery systems.

Comparison of Two Types of Intrathecal Morphine Administration by Pump for Analgesia in Cancer Patients With Failure of Conventional Analgesic Therapy.

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare intrathecal morphine administration: using a pump with continuous or programmable flow.

Detailed Description

Cancer is frequently associated with pain. In spite of recent improvements in cancer related pain treatment, incidence of cancerous chronic pain did not decrease. Indeed, 15 to 20% of patients are still suffering from intractable pain despite an optimal symptom management.

Treatment of cancer pain is generally based on the WHO analgesic ladder according to 3 steps. Patients with advanced cancer are often treated at WHO step 3 analgesics, i.e. morphine and its derivatives, at high dosages. But increasing the dosage of opioids also leads to accentuation of their adverse events and the corresponding risks.

At this stage of the disease, in patients with failure of conventional analgesic therapy, intrathecal injection of analgesics can be decided in order to relieve pain. 2 types of pumps allow intrathecal morphine administration : continuous or programmable flow. In this study, we want to compare the quality of analgesia obtained through these 2 flows.

Failure of optimal conventional analgesic therapy : either due to intolerable adverse events or to lack of efficacy, i.e. after having tried opioid rotation techniques, different way of administration, use of rapid-acting narcotics to control acute episodes of pain, use of intravenous morphine by PCA pump.

Possibility of return home

Dated and signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Ongoing pregnancy.

Ongoing systemic infection.

Injection site infection.

Estimated survival less than 90 days.

Allergy or intolerance to morphine.

Contraindication to implantation of an intrathecal catheter.

Patient treated with a powerful CYP1A2 inhibitor, such as fluvoxamine or enoxacin.

Intrathecal chemotherapy planned.

Sex/Gender

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Ages

18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Contacts ICMJE

Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects