A Quick Take On The Media And White Nationalism

Now that the alt-right is the new right, (and neocons are cast to the whiny kvetchlands), be prepared for the leftoid media to twist and misrepresent the nascent revolution’s nationalist-populism message, shoving it into an anti-White boilerplate narrative that the Left prefers and can more easily control.

The legacy media will attempt to deceitfully conflate White Nationalism with race purity to avoid grappling with sensible alt-right policy prescriptions that return the US to 80+% White.

Racial purity is not the goal. (It’s a red herring; few are calling for it and those that are recognize true racial purity is practically impossible.) Demographic dominance assuring societal stability and cultural hegemony is the goal. Yes, cultural hegemony. Or how some would quaintly describe it: “a nation”.

If the objective of a minimum 80% White USA is thwarted by liberals who think it’s evil incarnate, the subsequent White identity iteration will validate their fears.

PS Reframe of the day: “White supremacy” is just shitlib snark for “White aptitude”.

Like this:

Related

207 Responses

We’ve got a pretty big advantage going into this though. We’ve been able to observe the leftoid hivemind’s assaults on others for a long time, and seeing exactly what caused those targets to falter (massive cuckoldry in the form of ‘compromise’ and the taking of a defensive stance whenever under attack, generally).

Now we know every little tactic they’ve got. So long as we remain disciplined they should not be able to hurt or defeat our movement like they have many others before us.

> “Now we know every little tactic they’ve got.” ——— Don’t get too arrogant there, Holmes. Tamir Pardo & Yossi Cohen & George Soros & Lloyd Blankfein & Daniel Kahnemann & all the rest of the termites might be evil, but they’re not stoopid. As sure as the sun will rise in the morning, and set in the evening, (((they))) [and (((their successors)))] will return with a vengeance.

No matter how high in society a person is, there are always competitors trying to take over. Find competetive families among ((them)) who want to dominate current houses and forge an ideological alliance.

Core Americans are ones to decide on America’s racial makeup. Pre-1965 ethnic balance would be acceptable to most, I think. But for European nations, a standard approaching 100% not just White, but of that nation holds, given both their smaller size and tighter ethnic identity.

[CH: i may be giving up too much ground to the anti-white enemy by calling for a retreat from racial purity discourse, but my cynical side has to give a nod to the realities on the ground. race purity, even if noble in pursuit, is at this moment in time a ripe fruit that the leftoid media will be too happy to pluck and squeeze the juice out of. alt-rightists need to play smarter than the enemy, because right now they have the numbers and the megaphone. hopefully not for much longer.]

I interviewed a black man yesterday for a job with me. He’s the most qualified candidate so far, and if I discover no flaw, I may hire him.

That, I suspect, is what fucks with the MSM narrative. I am as racist as any klansman you could meet, but a black American’s US heritage likely goes back past 1800. Give me a choice between him and a mestizo, and I’ll take the black American. The black man and I have no alternative but to MAGA.

Besides, he’s probly more white than the mestizo.

[CH: obviously the biggest hurdle to racial purity goals in america is the black population, most of whom can claim to have roots in the US since before the founding. i suppose true WNs get around this by suggesting separation into two countries.]

I don’t give a little rat’s fuck if your black friend has US heritage that goes back past 1800. The insane, out-of-control crime rate of the black and general Chaos/Horrors that the Negro creates (wherever he lives) disqualifies the Negro from claiming ANY part of the USA. They have to go back to Africa. Period. No excuses. Yes, they can claim to have roots in the US since before the founding. But so fucking what?!

The aborigines have every right to claim that Australia belongs to them (they were there for thousands of years). but whitey took over that place. Australia belongs to whitey now and no one disputes that. Abos can claim to have roots in that place long before Europeans or Asians came along.

In fact, I propose a trade. Free voluntary immigration to US for all Australian whites and mandatory emigration of US blacks to Australia. Of course, the whites in Sydney and Melbourne will flee their country once they see the Negro population growing.

Core Americans must decide the racial makeup of not only America but the European nations as well since most of their own people have been mentally conquered and are now unable to effectively resist. The loss of the genetic diversity and separately selected strains that took thousands of years to develop, to see them mixed into a mongrel mess would be a permanent loss not just to the White race, but the human race.

Once again Americans are going to have to repel the invasion of Europe. Third time’s the charm.

Except this one’s going to be even messier, since it’s no longer ‘the good guys are on this side and the bad guys are on that side’.
It’ll have to be house-to-house, since the bad guys are now EVERYWHERE, including Scotland and northern Scandinavia, mixed in with the native population.

The first two times around, muzz had professional armies. Now they have welfare leches in track suits. Most won’t dig in; they’ll leave once they see which way the wind is blowing and the gibs are cut off.

“White supremacy”, “white nationalism”, “white racism”, “white existence”: to our enemies –eaten up with resentment and envy masquerading as “a passion for justice”–they are all equivalent. Parsing the differences might mean something to us but to them we’re all destined for destruction.

Don’t try those tired Alinsky squid ink tactics, distracting the issue into some sort of debate when, at first glance, both shitshins and YT can see “who is White”.

We’re the most diverse race on the planet… every eye colour, every hair color, most every hair texture, and skin tone within a ruddy to pale to yes, even a certain amount of swarthyness that doesn’t go too far to the dark side.

Just because there’s an “ideal” Aryan (light hair, light eyes, tall) doesn’t mean we need to get into self-defeating debates about all of our brothers within the White family.

That you clown yids still try to divide us with such claptrap, in this year… I can’t even…

You’re deploying the Continuum Fallacy. As the name indicates this is a form of fallacious reasoning which asserts that the absence of clear lines of demarcation means the absence of difference. Savannah segues into desert with no clear demarcation lines but nobody denies there are such things as savannahs and deserts and that they’re very different.

Funny how nothing gets earned in White society, it all just fell into our laps, generation after generation.

Like the only reason we don’t wipe our asses in the streets and live in mud huts is because we’re “privileged” and have all inherited 6 million dollars from our parents, who inherited like amounts from their parents, etc. on down the line.

And “oppressive”? What oppressive is your continuous inanity. I ask again, for the nth time, if YT be so oppressive, why ain’t all the shitskins headin’ the OTHER way?

Cmon , you started googd but now, getting out of line. You seriosly remind me strapon within, He also started neutral on the PUA topics then became full blown bitter and passive aggressive.
Whats going on with your identity tho? Since your mother is not Jewish, you aint either.

Hearstie,
I urge you to reconsider. This type of “measured response” is how chucks operate. Appealing to reason, rationality, and introspective thought. Although that is the way you convince me, and many others, of the merits of an idea, that is not effective on the irrational.
Remember, trump is the one who said “deport all illegals! Ban Muslims! And then settled into something more palatable. The lesson? Go big on the first ask, and don’t let up until you’ve clearly won, then you can clean up the middle.
Go big, go hard, don’t stop. Until you’ve won, then perhaps offer the merciful olive branch of the glorious victor.
Secondly, be careful to let how you operate on a personal scale, reflect how things should be on a national policy scale. For example, I know a few smart non-white people, who integrate well, and are an asset to this country. They are the exception, not the rule. The rule needs to be Americans first. OUR posterity first and only. Once we’ve achieved the 80%, perhaps we may, in our magnanimity allow for 20% migrants.

The point, never, ever temper what you say because they left may use it against you. You can be a feminist and wear the wrong T-shirt and they’ll hang you with that.

Mathematically, if you want to maintain your ethnicity percentages, and if all ethnicities have the same Total Fertility Rates, then immigration would have to perfectly mirror your existing ethnicity percentages – even the slightest imbalance in percentages will destroy you [which of course was precisely the purpose of (((The 1965 Immigration Act)))].

Mildly off-topic, but perfect stasis [via stable Fertility/Immigration Rates which stably maintain more or less exactly the same population over time] seems to be insanely difficult to achieve in Nature: Shizazzle seems to want to either increase geometrically into total domination, or decline geometrically into oblivion.

You can admit immigrants that are have a greater % White than the present population at any given time and you’ll eventually get to the target population demographics, but it’s much faster to have the immigrant White % higher than your population target % from the start. Problem is, the Whites overseas are almost all way too leftist to be a good idea to admit. About 20% of them at most would be acceptable, and most of those don’t want to emigrate.

So to achieve a more White population, the politics of other White countries has to go way to the right, including in schools, for a generation before those countries can help us by sending people. In the meantime, immigration has to nearly stop and emigration of non-Whites and hyphenated-Americans has to be encouraged. The White birthrate has to be encouraged by ending d1vorce-rape, making women’s marital obligations legally enforceable, publicizing enforcement of laws against sex with anyone other than a spouse, restricting higher ed for women, increasing pay and financial security for White men who support families, and getting TV and movies to favor stay-at-home White moms and working White dads.

This. We need Stalinist interventions to make America great again. Joseph Stalin managed to enslave 100 million in the name of communism. He did it easily. We can deport 100 million (we have the new technology) easily.

You define the social norms. If advertising here is all white and if the leaders stop pandering to non whites it creates an alienated division. You drive this culture making non white feel unwelcomed.
Theye will soon start leaving with cries of ‘we’re not welcome here’ ‘America is not what it was’
80% of immigrants here don’t like white American culture. They don’t like guns, rodeos, the food, baseball, hockey, the history (I’ve never seen a non white at Gettysburg).
Drive this Americanism and mist if them will fuck off.
Also I’d say at leat 30% of immigrants are home sick . Multiculturalism is a failed experiment.

Well that is never going to happen so what else you got? Even if women start having more kids, where are they going to work when they grow up? Technology is eliminating jobs at a massive rate. At least women are bringing home money while lots of guys sit around waiting for rusted out useless factories to reopen.

Couldn’t agree more, and the cucked faggots saying it will “never happen” are the same losers who told us a Trump victory was impossible. When will you numbskulls get it through your heads? The White Man can do ANYTHING that he firmly sets his will to do!

No not at all because technology is affecting men and women differently in the workplace. Timken Steel just increased their production 25% at one of their plants without hiring one extra person. Meanwhile with our economy favoring the service industry, women get all sorts of opportunities to be interactive social media policy strategists – meaning they screw around on Facebook and Twitter all day.

Well I would love a society filled with women who looked like Arianna Grande, Kerry Washington, Hailed Berry versus Mama June, Roseanne Barr, your average Walmart shopper. Here in Ohio it seems like women don’t even try to be feminine demure and attractive. All I see are obese, tatted up, smokers who think dressing up is wearing a clean hoodie.

Immaterial and irrelevant that there are some good-looking mischling negressess and some horrible allegedly White women out there.

Because you don’t get to “trade” our bad ones for their cute ones… and for every cute negress (cream in the coffee), there are a thousand she-boons that you don’t want anywhere outside of the Serengeti.

Get your head out of yo’ azz, because when you say such things you’re staying in the Synathedral’s frame and carrying their water.

yes, ripp. you nailed it. no one in the deep state misses the fact that pro-america/nationalist policies are pro-white and anti-jew. browns are just collateral.

no need to discuss race at all anymore. it’s implicit in the MAGA frame. every policy that’s good for America is bad for (((parasites))). free speech, a gun in every glove compartment, a factory on every corner, a wall at every border. nothing racist about it. it’s just the “American” way. wink wink.

(((they’re))) only leverage is white guilt, which is the same as anti-patriotism. patriotism and MAGA ends that whole silly conversation in one swoop. you can’t simultaneously MAGA and do guilt.

the parasites will have to find something else to do, like shovel coal.

But I always have this nagging feeling about staying in the “Hey, it’s not racist because…” frame, because it still gives those who would upend us the alleged moral high ground…

… and of course, there’s always the old trap: no matter how nice we are, no matter how fairly we play the game, the fact that Whites do better than nonWhites will always make us “rayciss” and put us on the psychological defensive.

Best to, as soon as possible, get into the frame of not tolerating that RAYCISS spiel anymore… or at least saying immediately “I don’t care if YOU think it’s racist. Discussion over.”

Ripp I call shitlibs racist. I think I’ve woken a few of them up to consider what they autoreflex do.
One theory is that shitlibs are not as strong as shitlords. They can never compete with say a Trump who would eat them for breakfast. Someone like a Trump hits home how weak they are which is why shit libs want to destroy alphas like Trump even if that means importing foreigners to do it.

I think we may be better off with a different phrase. “Dominance” is too strong, and scary. Consider something like “demographic stability,” “demographic balance,” “a White majority.” Even “demographic predominance” would be better.

Actually, thinking about this more, “White majority” could be really effective. It doesn’t necessarily assert dominance (so it’s less provocative and subject to attack). There’s no express percentage – which might trigger fears of ethnic cleansing, forced deportations. And anyone who attacks it could themselves be accused of racism or intolerance . Examples:

“Do you have a problem with a White majority?”

“Are you trying to make Whites a minority in [the United States/Germany/France/England/Europe]?”

I understand the spirit of what you’re saying, but it won’t work. At it’s core, the cuckservatives got us here by trying to be nice and paltable. We need to ditch the politeness, while remaining convincing, compelling, and fun.

I like the idea of shifting the meaning of “nation” back to its original meaning of genetic heritage by saying “nation-state” whenever talking about government. We can also flip the left’s tactic of specifying a demographic direction rather than a particular target percentage — “as nationalists, we just want to make the USA more of a nation, rather than a confederacy or an empire.” (No goodthinking lib can admit to being in favor of confederacy or empire.)

In the long run, even one transfer between nations per generation will prevent them from becoming or remaining genetically separate, so the long term goal would be no interbreeding of peoples. On the other hand, future generations will be genetically engineered, so such concerns will be moot. As genetic technology becomes widespread, nations will have to define themselves, choose their genetics and exclude foreign genes in some unified way in order to maintain or develop distinct identities. Likely genes will cease to be the basis of lasting national identity for many, becoming more like fads and fashions that come and go with the generations. I expect a generation of reaction against most human germ-line genetic technologies before things get too weird, but the Chinese may not wait.

You will have a smaller America if you want 90-99% white. Racial purity occurs in small nations, not big ones. Norway is pure Norwegian. Russia is multi-ethnic. Part of California will have to be annexed by Mexico. A new nation-state for blacks (Mississippi?).

It would still be very, very easy to deport any nonwhite from Oslo back to their brown/black homelands. If a far-right party (I’m talking about a real Nazi party) came to power tomorrow in Norway/Sweden/Denmark, the immigrants would leave IMMEDIATELY. The Pakistani/Afghans would volunteer to leave. You wouldn’t even need to deport them. They’d take any savings in their bank accounts and they would buy airplane tickets back to Kabul/Lahore.

A country with lots of land area (Brazil, USA, Russia) is almost impossible to be 100% monoculture/monoethnic. That was my point. Small countries can manage racial ‘purity’.

There has been some discussion that below a certain percent of non whites, the whites get too complacent and sell their heritage down the river This thinking says whites need to be inoculated by exposure.

If so there is probably and optimum percent white that may be lower than 90. A rate that high would be considered unsustainable.

I am a National Socialist. Racial purity, particularly for the Nordic race, both in Europe and North America, is precisely my goal. All those in favor should line up to the right of me. All those not in favor should line up to the left of me…so they can go fuck themselves!

I want Greg Elliot, I want Captain Obvious, to stand as men now and tell me which side they are on. Are they to the right of me? Do they stand for the uncompromising life of their people? Or do they stand to the left of me, for the slow regularization of a mongrelizing death, ie, donning their knee pads to suck Abe Foxman’s cock?

You need to go to Svenska and get those Nordic kin of yours to embrace your stuff. Me as a Scots English with a great grandma a Tunica -Choctaw injun on my momma’s side , don’t need a squarehead to to tell me shit.

Well, I thought it would have been obvious by now where I stand on the issue of the 14 Words… I’ve stated them here often enough and plainly enough, and I can’t think of any way to make things plainer.

That said, I don’t appreciate you using the same tired homoerotic projections that our enemies try to shame us with.

And I DON’T take orders to stand as anyone else’s concept of what being a man entails.

I let my thoughts and words here in Cyberia speak for themselves…

… and when I have the luxury of having this sort of discussion in meat world, I add the proviso that, whoever doesn’t like it, can see me outside.

“…[Bannon] mockingly rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,”… “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If …the Trump White House [delivers] “we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed. They were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

“ “Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.””

Bannon is ex-Navy, an alumnus of VA Tech, Georgetown and Harvard Business School. He could’ve lived comfortably as one of THEM, a smug Democrat bubble-world operative. Instead, he’s the point man for our interests.

The trouble is, as we’ve found out, yon these past few generations, is you don’t really inspire people by money… you only assuage SOME of their dissatisfaction.

If you’re rah-rah’ing a house in the suburbs, two cars in every garage, and a chicken in every pot… but the other guy is pounding the collective chest of “Mah PEOPLE!!!”, guess who eventually wins… especially when the ‘burbs are now next to Section 8, one car is repo’ed and the other needs repair, and them chicken bones are making but thin soup.

Prosperity is what led us to our weakened state, because that was all we honored.

Prosperity should merely be a result, not a goal, of an awakened people with pride of nation and race, culture and community.

Perhaps the Left is truly smarter and more insidious than we previously thought.

What if it is all connected? What if The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was indeed to not only change demographics for a permanent leftist majority. But that without an ever increasing flow of more desperate, needy immigrants the demographics don’t shift.

What if the Left really knows that it’s not the number of immigrants that keep a leftist policy bias, But the FLOW of immigrants FROM certain reliably Left sources?

In other words they know what happened with Trump (Minorities voting against Democrats) IS the logical outcome eventually. Eventually the people here who ARE HERE and don’t wish their lives economically eroded by a sea or 3rd worlders.

To Quote Center for Immigration Studies about the 1965 law.

”
Despite the noble words, the architects of the 1965 law did not see it as a means of significantly changing the immigration flow — it was considered more a symbolic act, an extension of civil rights sentiments beyond our borders. Proponents repeatedly denied that the law would lead to a huge and sustained increase in the number of newcomers and become a vehicle for globalizing immigration. Many senators and representatives believed that the new, equal quotas would not be fully used by European, Asian, and Middle Eastern nations. In addition, they did not foresee the expansion of non-quota admissions (those not covered by numerical limits) under the act’s strengthened provisions for family reunification.

The unexpected result has been one of the greatest waves of immigration in the nation’s history — more than 18 million legal immigrants since the law’s passage, over triple the number admitted during the previous 30 years, as well as uncountable millions of illegal immigrants. And the new immigrants are more likely to stay (rather than return home after a time) than those who came around the turn of the century. Moreover, this new, enlarged immigration flow came from countries in Asia and Latin America which heretofore had sent few of their sons and daughters to the United States. And finally, although the average level of education of immigrants has increased somewhat over the past 30 years, the negative gap between their education and that of native-born Americans has increased significantly, creating a mismatch between newcomers and the needs of a modern, high-tech economy.

This paper offers a brief overview of the issues relating to the anniversary, including quotes from many of the participants, as well as an outline of the law’s consequences.
”

The Dems NEED NEED NEED a constant flow of DUMB immigrants to keep the whole ponzi scheme going. Otherwise the new immigrants will have kids that get educated enough to perhaps NOT vote like their betters want.

THIS is why the WALL is so threatening. If the flow is limited. The Democrats can say goodbye to their hope for Demographic election dominance.

And economic, health care, poverty just come along with the flow that creates a permanent under class.

Words are the enemies weapons. We crack heads and kick asses. White Supremacy is Western Civilization. Even one non-White is one too many. Those niggers had ancestors here two or three hundred years ago? I don’t care. The goal is no niggers. I don’t give a shit if they were born in The White House, they aren’t staying.

Skin color alone doesn’t make someone better than someone else. Plenty of whites are absolute idiots. Plenty of whites are morbidly obese blobs. Plenty of whites are violent. Plenty of whites are shiftless and lazy. The ideal is to have people here who want to better themselves and their families regardless of their skin color.

Regression to the mean doesn’t really apply when it comes to using eugenics to make people smarter. While it is true that parents at an extreme end of the bell curve are likely to have offspring closer to the middle, every generation of higher intelligence offspring resets the mean, even if just a little bit at a time. Commingling genes that code for intelligence will result in a increase over time, just like with any other evolutionary selection process. Otherwise there would not be different intellectual means among different populations of people, and there obviously are.

Perfect regression to the mean occurs only for independent events where the baseline remains exactly the same. For example, rolling a fair die or flipping a coin will not allow for unusual streaks over a long period of time. Any particular number on a die will come up 1/6th of the time and a particular side of the coin 1/2 of the time, and that won’t change because dice and coins do not evolve.

This IQ drop applies to South Americans, Middle east, and India as well, where the IQ hovers around 90. Even selective immigration policy will just result in IQ degeneracy in 2 generations. They are ticking time bomb, unless your end goal is low IQ slave labour, they are a problem in the long term

To be fair many middle-easterns are “white”, but I meant the non-white variety

Right on the money. And it’s exactly these stratified IQ differences in a multiculti society that produce all the friction, violence, crime, low trust.

It’s like putting people of all different heights on a basketball course, and then telling them all that they have an equal chance to win the game.

Our society is engineered to produce winners and losers, and the losers will never leave us alone. They will never stop committing crimes against us and expecting handouts from us. The low IQ dregs simply cannot compete in the advanced society we built.

The best solution is to narrow the range of IQ and other genetic proclivities within any given population. And that’s what nature already wants us to do anyway, which is why we all feel more at ease with members of our own race.

You’re almost right, but the effects of regression to the mean are basically gone after one generation, the third generation will revert to the mean of the second generation. Also, as regression to the mean is a statistical effect of imperfectly correlated measurements of the same quantity, any given person’s IQ scores on repeated tests will be on average closer to his population’s mean for both the last test he took and the next test he will take. Similarly, a person’s parents’ scores are likely to be closer to the population mean, as well as that person’s children’s scores.

One other quibble – the poor-White / rich-Black SAT scores are statistically the same, the Black score being very slightly greater in some years. Which still disproves the theory that economic disadvantage is responsible for Blacks’ lower average scores.

You might be astonished to find out that there are plenty of categories for people. I was just being rational and objective in my comments. Do I prefer a whiter America? Yes. Do I realize whites have done incredibly stupid things and live in way less superior ways? Also yes.

Skin color alone doesn’t make someone better than someone else. Plenty of whites are absolute idiots. Plenty of whites are morbidly obese blobs. Plenty of whites are violent. Plenty of whites are shiftless and lazy. The ideal is to have people here who want to better themselves and their families regardless of their skin color.

Well now, isn’t that quaint.

Sounds like what folks of good will have been saying about ‘Murrica just about since its inception.

How’s that working out for ya, Uncle Sam?

All condescension aside, geez, Louise, have you learned NOTHING about where your stated philosophy gets a nation?

Look around you, man… THIS is what happens when your otherwise-noble-sounding philosophy gets implemented in meat world.

Pretty much always look around me. I stated rational observations and a ideal situation. I read about whites addicted to heroin, getting multiple dui’s, getting arrested multiple times for domestic assault, etc. How about whites start living in superior ways and then start going after other races.

Has anyone here NOT said that we Whites have a lot of house-cleaning to do, you fuck? 😡

How about throwing me a buck for every time I myself have said that we Whites have fallen short of, not only the glory of God, but of our duties and responsibilities?

But for every 20% of White shitheels, there are 80% of the other-coloured variety, and you DAMN well know this…

… yet you invariably pull the “there are some of them better than us” agitprop.

Point is, if we didn’t have The Other n1ggerizing our culture, at the behest of and with full assistance of the other (((Other))), it would be a lot easier and quicker to save our own who are worth saving, and eradicating those that aren’t.

This isn’t rocket science, and if you keep spieling the same inanities, you mark yourself as just another shill or useful idiot for the Synathedral.

Hey rick,stupid cuck fag, I’m tired of the fallacy that skin color doesn’t make people better, no racist has ever said that skin color is causative of being x or y. The ideal is have people who is similar to you. You aren’t the best, but your parents sure treated you like you were the first, this isn’t about who is better, is about who is who and who much blood shares with you. A random monkey could deserve more caring from your parents than you according to your standars.

Ok so you agree with me. I would rather have people who are hard working striving to better their lives making contributions to society; people who are just like me, around me. As to blood, they bleed red just like me. I can’t help but wonder if whites are so superior why are they committing suicide the most, suffer from autism the most, suffer from asthma and allergies more, and commit more mass murders. I want to be proud of my race but I refuse to put blinders on.

Give it some time, it took generations to make this mess, it’s going to take generations to fix it, provided it can be fixed.
This topic is one of the reasons why I think those who worship Hitler & The Nazis (how’s THAT for a band name ?!!) are on the wrong track, because those guys did more damage to the White race in 12 years than any rainbow coalition of enemies could have done in thousands.
How so ?
By allowing subsequent generations of Whites to be cowed and browbeaten into instant defensive submission with accusations of ‘racism’ or similar.
In Germany, one of the leftie globaloids favorite accusatory word is ‘menschenverachtend’ (despising people).
As long as we let ourselves be scared into a corner by such insults, the enemy has the upper hand.
You know what to do.

so sort of off topic, I have been repeatedly seeing in the news a discussion about ‘fake news’ and I think I have a pretty good idea of what that means and why the left is talking about it. This is the latest theory that the left is using to explain how their lesser fellow citizens could have elected trump. Funnily enough, that smugness is exactly why trump is in power. But also, another funny part about it is that facebook was called to task on the propagation of this fake news and Mark Zuckerberg himself said that fake news was a tiny percent of the overall news on fb and not only that he said it was ‘pretty crazy’ that fake news could have swung an election. For a while now I have suspected that zuckerberg is not really as much of a leftist as people think based on a number of things he has said and done.

oh not only that but i recall after brexit that there were all these spurious reports about a huge sudden uptick in hate crimes. i remember hearing about hate crimes against the poles and hate crimes against gays and against muslims and all of it was made up by them but the left was happy to run fake news stories about the hate crimes that couldn’t be validated by anyone. and now i imagine a similar thing happening in the US with a sudden uptick in hate crimes by white males going on despite the complete lack of valid data i.e. fake news.

I can’t remember the last time I heard of a genuine hate crime by Whites that didn’t turn out to be a hoax. All of the recent ones are fake. Hate Crime Hoaxes are the new False Rape Accusations. The prosecution for such fuckery needs to be severe.

The problem with the Alt-Right is that it’s a bastard child of the enlightenment. It’s anti-demotism that’s demotist at root. It focuses on demographics to the exclusion of everything else.

How do you organize a society around Lockean notions of property, and restraints on power aka the rule of law, and not expect leftist holiness spirals to ensue? You can’t. And the dissident right is just more of the same liberal insanity.

The nature of power is to expand and remove all shackles on its ability to freely exercise power. Stirring discontent from below is a tried-and-true way of achieving it. This isn’t limited to angry ethnics, but they’re the easiest to mobilize.

What you blame on Jewish subversion is just the physics of insecure power in action.

The problem of Jewish Subversion is STILL so overwhelming that it is completely reasonable to demand total expulsion.

You sound like a smart kid. Surely you wouldn’t try to argue that there is no such thing as Jewish Subversion? Surely you see it all around you just like we do. Any agent of subversion is an enemy. It doesn’t matter how successful their efforts are.

Kushner could turn out to be a problem, but, again, you can’t go from multikulti pc world war colonial slavery guilt tripping to Viking Kingdom overnight.
As the daughter of Noo Yoack mega-tycoon, Ivanka grew up with money, probably likes money (a lot, she is a woman, after all) and many guys in the circles she moves in (NY Money) are Jewish, hence the hubby.
Could have made a better choice, but she didn’t.
Let’s first make sure North America doesn’t become Brazil and Europe doesn’t become India, then we’ll worry about other details.

Well, I have heard that, on occasion, there are one or two “good” (((ones))) to be found.

Look, we’re not going to have a Fourth Reich with Trump… and let’s face it, as long as Jews stump for Israel, we can always shut down their multi-kulti arguments on this side of the pond.

If a magic wand could be waived and tomorrow there would be 80+% Whites, 5% Jews, and the rest various Oriental, Hispanic, and negro races which comprised the USA, who WOULDN’T sign for that right now?

Especially with the benefit of our experience on how not to let things get out of hand? It would be a rare Mulligan granted by History.

Granted, there WOULD have to be some limits on who controls the MSM and the judicial.

You sound like a smart kid. Surely you wouldn’t try to argue that there is no such thing as Jewish Subversion? Surely you see it all around you just like we do. Any agent of subversion is an enemy. It doesn’t matter how successful their efforts are.

WHY do you keep playing into the Kike’s frame?

He’s been doing nothing BUT arguing that there’s no such thing as Jewish Subversion… leastwise, not enough to be any cause for concern among the “white trash” and “1488 lemmings”.

It could be paranoid power, but weren’t the jews doing the psy ops from the begining to get precissely more power? The power is not the common denominator, notice some other??
For none of us right wing holiness spirals are bad, except the national-feminist ones. What we hate from the left is not holiness spirals, is that they are the left, we hate their holiness spirals in the way they make the thing even more left wing.

What I love the most so far about Der Trumpenkrieg is the fact that he relentlessly calls out and eviscerates the liberal media on their bullshit and exposes them to the general populace. He can do that now because he has TWATTER, and can you imagine the backlash if twitter tried to censor the POTUS’s account?

He now has the biggest podium with the loudest megaphone for 4 years minimum, likely 8.

Love the fact that Trump completely leaves the media in the dust and doesn’t play by their rules.
He may be the first Republican president to understand that they are NOT his friends, will NEVER be his friends and that there is NOTHING he can do to make them his friends.
They must be treated accordingly.

“…the Alt-Right party is over. Which is something I’m thankful for, because I always thought that name was gay as all hell. No offense to the people who though it didn’t suck, but what was it supposed to be an alternative to? I get that it was an alternative to cuckservatism, but it sounds like it’s an alternative to the right-wing. Also, the word “alternative” implies lesbianism in my mind and probably most people’s minds.

You know what identifier doesn’t imply lesbianism?

“Republican.”

…When you type just “alt-right” it’s even worse – you get a bunch of pictures of a Jewish homosexual. However, when you type “republican,” you get a bunch of versions of a sweet fascist logo featuring an elephant.”

The foundation myths of many ancient civilizations include a warning about the limits of genetic similarity as a basis for getting along together. Cain and Abel, Romulus and Remus – exact twins, yet one ends up killing the other over trivial disputes.
My point is that similarity of blood is nice for sorts all of reasons but if you want a real civilization there are a lot of high order social skills that must be developed – and those will inevitably involve tolerating “the other” to a certain extent.

Other than treating boredom, the reason I comment here is to add thoughts that no one else has mentioned yet and that I, in my delusional self regard, think worth adding to the stew (or sausage) being assembled within the thread.
If that is “slipping in a little distraction” then… whatever.

“Go have sex with a 15 year old ” woman ” and report back how the judicial system views your cut off age”

Sounds like you’re being snarky but, although I can’t be bothered to look it up at the moment, I’m fairly certain the legal age of consent in Puerto Rico is 14 or 15 … vfm is spot on with his quinceanera thing.

Being attracted to jailbait and actually having sex with jailbait are two different things. I figure the word ” jail ” is in that word for a reason.

@Ricky
The only reason the age of consent is set at 18 anywhere is because of a weird combination of virtue-signaling feminists and family-values Victorians.

I don’t understand why you can’t see that while, sure, it may be sinful, it is not actually deserving of jailing and being forced to register as a sex offender for the rest of your life as if you had raped an 8-year-old boy.

One thing we need to do is have a war on white obesity. Fat shaming needs to become the norm.
Obesity should not be tolerated.
I’d even go so far as to have compulsory fitness classes even by government mandate before you can be accepted for health insurance.
Liberals dominate the healthy food space…we need to get nationalists into this too.
Healthy bodies healthy minds.
Once whites become more athletic we will regain our coolness.
I grew up watching Colt Seevers…Face in the A Team and Dukes of Hazzard. It was cool to be a white kid.

I’ve been saying very similar things for years, one poster in particular constantly misinterpreting my statements as ‘fetishism’.
When White guys re-take the athletic high ground of great abs, White girls will stop fucking non-White guys.
Just to name 1 example.

Nah, wolfie – I’ve never had great abs and never had problems fucking White girls. You know from hanging around here that “abs” and other physical features are low on the list of what attracts girls to men. Not saying that White men shouldn’t be pushing the iron, but you’re barking up the wrong tree.

It’s more likely that too many Whites are behind in today’s “game” mentality because we developed for a more civilized form of it.

We have the right to have White countries in the world, that’s pretty much it.

I want to see the Republican party get to the point where it openly says America should protect it’s White majority and not alter the demographic makeup of the country anymore. That is a reasonable position and doesn’t hurt anyone. I think if shitlibs had to argue against that they would be surprised how horrible they would look to average Americans.

Before you can win an argument you have to determine what the argument is going to be about.

This thread is just the latest in a long history of American hate. First was the hatred of the savage red man, then the Irish, then the Chinese, then southern Europeans- with a good hatred of the Jew pretty much all along. We seem to like St Patrick’s Day, Chinese buffets and Italian wines and food just fine. I wonder how many guys here watch and/or professional sports even though the majority of players are black or Hispanic.

Wasn’t a post for debate really-just a re-cap of history. I see how the media forces diversity on us. I know unity is strength but I also feel that if other races are here, let’s be strong enough to take the best they have to offer and contain the crap they cause. I don’t idolize or follow black athletes or rappers but there are plenty of hot women from other races I would love to screw.

What is really easy to not care about are personal attack replies versus intellectual rebuttals about points and insights made. Insults and vulgarities remind me of blustering boys trying to puff themselves up. So let’s cut the crap and discuss things in an adult manner. After all, aren’t we supposedly superior white men?

Rick apparently didn’t get the memo… we DON’T debate with the shitlibbery of the Left anymore… we give it only the drive-by mockery and disdain it merits.

All of your “concern points” have been addressed innumerable times on this site and others in Cyberia… yet you and your ilk just keep ignoring the points and continue to repeat the inanities the next time around, hoping nobody noticed the ass-kickin’ you got last time.

Even in this thread, amid some of the mockery and disdain, your feelz were addressed, yet you ignore and keep plowing on, with that oh-so-delicate tactic of intellectualer-than-thou to take the sting out of our barbs that keep hitting the mark.

Whatever was talked about prior to this thread is unknown to me. Barbs mean nothing-just words on a screen. I will admit the insights I am getting to the mindset in this group are intriguing. Maybe one day I will see some insight as to why you have such intense hatred for economically disenfranchised minorities when the 1% elite is jerking you around and making sure your life does not improve.

Maybe one day I will see some insight as to why you have such intense hatred for economically disenfranchised minorities when the 1% elite is jerking you around and making sure your life does not improve.

The same shit we’ve been hearing since as far back as the sixties… you clowns really do need a new playbook.

“Intense hatred” comes from the behavior of said “economically disenfrachized minorities”. Anyone who can live a very decent and normal life in this country just ain’t tryin’… and maybe if said minorities didn’t hate us so much, with their crime and general miscreant behavior, they wouldn’t need such SJW allies as yourself… assuming you’re White, that is..

@Rick. Whether intentional or not this is straight from the hasbara playbook. Include as many White ethnicities as you can and say that they were all opposed by the original Whites at one point or another.

The media exists to make a profit. It MUST entertain at the same time as it unleashes its propaganda blitz, or the advertisers will withdraw their dollars in response to declining Neilsen ratings, and the boss corporation of the network will holler blue murder. In order to break the liberal stranglehold, something must come along more entertaining but equally mind-influential.

Anyone see the rope-a-dope at the Broadway presentation of Hamilton? The crowd and the cast tried to shame Pence who was in audience. He held ground as they flailed impotently around him, unaware that rightly-viewed history has Hamilton as a big part of the problem then and now.

See nypost.com article for pix: “Vice President-elect Mike Pence was booed Friday night at a performance of the Broadway hit “Hamilton.”
Pence was walking to his seat at the Richard Rodgers Theatre when a few scattered claps turned into a thundering chorus of boos.

The crowd continued to mock Pence throughout the performance, including during the song “Yorktown,” when Alexander Hamilton and Marquis de Lafayette sang “Immigrants, we get the job done.” They high-fived each other as the audience cheered.

Brandon Dixon, who plays Aaron Burr, addressed Pence after the curtain call, saying the diverse cast is “anxious” about his administration.”

Videos, too. The lead just grandstanding through the curtain call, singling out Pence the audience member from such an “obvious moral high ground” assumed-position, which is anything but warranted by the real story of Hamilton the traitor to the confederation and father of big government.

Who knew that John Carpenter was so prescient? Turns out that his dystopian Escape from NY (Manhattan Island) vision in 1980 was spot on. It just turns out that it was suicidal virtue signalling & guilt tripping apologia about the nature of criminality that is at the heart of the downward spiral. I see 2 Americas going fwd: 1) Heartland areas where honesty & hard work prevail; 2) SWPL macro-cantinas which combine rampant criminality & brainwashing to inculcate white-guilt as the root of all problemas irrespective of the facts.

Red Dawn is oft cited as an inspiring flic for the Alt Right, but the thin veneer of civilization is better captured by John Carpenter films. Snake Plissken has some commonality with Trump, that’s for sure. At least in terms of ZFG attitude.

We need to re-institute eugenics and make miscegenation unlawful again. I also think that the paper-bag test should be re-instituted. It could be utilized and helpful for a deportation program for POC’s. And, I am not being facetious.

The Alt Right is fine with nonwhites as long they are pro-USA, pro-assimilation, pro-freedom of speech & freedom of association. More importantly would be that they are pro-personal responsibilty, and ok with letting western countries have enforced immigration standards. There are a few of what Vox day calls the “Alt-Retard” in this movement who seem to be nutty about about lineage criteria, but would say they are just a few cranks. More likely they are plants by the ADL, SPLC who want to make the Alt Right appear as a deranged Frankenstein.

Yep, 80% sounds like a good number. And when progressives get in your face and tell you that’s wayyyyciss, just remain calm and say it’s less white than the gifted/talented magnet school you’re trying to get little Elliott or Zoe into.

One thing about liberals remember they are weak, neurotic and will never win.
Either we crush them or the muzzies will.
Their media showsites this perfectly.
Giuliani mentioned this in Trumps Gettysburg speech how they think too much.
Hitler use say the same. Intelligence is good up to a point. Physical and moral strength is just as important. Avoid mental masturbation or mindwank…as Krauser calls it.
Liberals wrap themselves up in excessive thought and self doubt.
I’ve totally stopped reading their media and I feel so much better. They would have articles like 1/3 of people suffer with chronic pain and I’d start holding my back. Media for losers, hyperchondriacs and weaklings.