Taking a measurement or recording an observation is nothing like making failed predictions.
Even then, the institutional level believers can't leave well enough alone and can't resist the temptation to manipulate the data. So they can't even get that right.

If was just ordinary people who got someting on internet... But it's more than 95% of the most briliant scientists in the world, believing in Global Warming. So I give credit for them.

Who said they were the most brilliant? What study was conducted to prove that the other 5% were less brilliant?

That 95% figure is merely those who agree that human activity affects global temperatures (anthropogenic global warming). It says nothing concerning the degree to which people affect the climate, or what the consequences will be.

Most on here would agree that humans affect the environment, and that includes global climate, so that is relatively uncontroversial. The interesting part of the debate is to what degree do we impact it, what are the consequences (both good and bad), and what are reasonable steps to mitigate the negative consequences.

We are going to get to really see how humans can mess with the climate when China starts dumping tons of stuff into the atmosphere to make it rain more.
But China is actually concerned about what amounts to solar induced global cooling, not man made global warming or the ambitious always moving target catch all of "man made climate change".

The climate is going to change, it's just the global warming believers have been completely wrong about what, how and when the whole time.
But they keep changing their story so they can pretend like they were right all along.
I'm going to have to say the church of global warming is full of it and they have no idea what's going on let along what's going to happen.

You claim this as a fact - but you are incorrect.

Humans are causing the climate to change this time, by burning fossil fuels. This is clear and there is no debate. All the evidence indicates this is the case.

Who said they were the most brilliant? What study was conducted to prove that the other 5% were less brilliant?

That 95% figure is merely those who agree that human activity affects global temperatures (anthropogenic global warming). It says nothing concerning the degree to which people affect the climate, or what the consequences will be.

Most on here would agree that humans affect the environment, and that includes global climate, so that is relatively uncontroversial. The interesting part of the debate is to what degree do we impact it, what are the consequences (both good and bad), and what are reasonable steps to mitigate the negative consequences.

The worst-case-scenario is that we've already emitted too much.That humans weren't on Earth the last time we had this concentration of CO2.What's there,will be there for 1,000 years,and feedback loops will advance geometrically,pushing towards extinction.We should cease emissions immediately and try to extract CO2 from the atmosphere.And we've lost at least 30-years due to corporo-government denial.
It's interesting.

I like how climate change and what causes it has some how gone from being a hypothesis to surpassing known laws of science as far as not being open for debate.
That just means they are scared.
This line of thinking alone is telling us all we need to know.