After watching and experiencing the way the Liberals act toward the people of this province I have concluded that there is one law for the people and one law for the Liberals.

The Liberal party has been engaging in attacks on other candidates, with the sole purpose of discrediting them and demanding there resignations. Some of the misdeeds are from four to twelve years old. Who is paying for these investigations? The Liberals? The people of BC through the (former) Public Affairs Bureau. Was a data base amassed and given to the Liberals for such purposes?

These attacks are done on other candidates while approximately 12 Liberals in the past 12 years have committed offenses much worse than those the Liberals are claiming of others.

1. There appears to be no investigation into the incident of her breaking the law by running a red light. Why are the police silent? What is ICBC doing about this?

2. She endangered the life of her child and a passenger in her vehicle, as well as her own.This alone would warrant a charge of reckless endangerment, driving without due care, and disobeying a traffic control.

3. Why has she not been charged?

4 Why has she not resigned as a candidate as others have done.

Do I smell two different sets of laws?

Because I know that the government watches this blog (and others) religiously I will assume they will attempt to dig more dirt up on me. Anything said about me will not be either confirmed nor denied.

Terrace Daily Additional Note: Watch Christy Clark Lie Openly and Publically, while making feeble excuses, to the Media about the Red Light by clicking here. Note her son tells us she always runs red lights. I wonder how she treats him now behind closed doors. Yeah, good mom, just like Mommy Dearest, poor kid.

His excuse was it wasn't a criminal offence in Hawaii - Her excuse is it was at 5 am and her son asked her to run the red light. More of the same it seems, entitlement and superiority, no respect.

further consideration

Comment by Catherine on 8th May 2013The mafia gangs use the pretty people among us to do their dirty work. These are people who are attractive, connected and look respectable. They use these types to sell. Much like Media companies use news readers instead of real journalists.

Think about how the famous among us are used to sell Minerals North, Northern Gateway etc. Why are these particular people selected? For their ability to connect with people (recognizable) and deliver inflection and passion in their speeches??? Are they being paid to discuss someone else's agenda and convince us that their koolaid is good for us.

Just a thought.

Quote

Comment by Catherine on 8th May 2013" In politics, corruption undermines democracy and good governance by flouting or even subverting formal processes. Corruption in elections and in the legislature reduces accountability and distorts representation in policymaking; corruption in the judiciary compromises the rule of law; and corruption in public administration results in the inefficient provision of services. It violates a basic principle of republicanism regarding the centrality of civic virtue. More generally, corruption erodes the institutional capacity of government if procedures are disregarded, resources are siphoned off, and public offices are bought and sold. Corruption undermines the legitimacy of government and such democratic values as trust and tolerance."

Now doesn't that look like what we're seeing??? As always, actions speak louder than words! Watch what they do, not what they say!

Robocalls

Comment by Terry on 7th May 2013I'm so sick of robocalls . They are impersonal , lazy , and insulting . They are as bad as the garbage signs that destroy our views of nature . And a waste of resourses ( paper , wood , money and labour ) . Any political party that imagines that a picture of them is going to sway votes are woefully devoid of brain cells . I made up my mind when we got the harper campbell knife in the back .