On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 03:38, Patrick Stickler wrote:
[...]
> > but there are
> > still three or four viable candidates:
> >
> > - untidy
> > - tidy
> > - two properties
>
> This has already been rejected by the WG.
I don't recall any such decision.
Giving your position on the issue is fine, but if
you're going to cite group decisions, please do
so by reference to the record.
[...]
> The WG has already decided that datatyping should work by one of the
> two proposed options,
which decision are you referring to here?
> based on the tidyness of literals, or lack
> thereof.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?