In
the Art world, particularly in the interpretation, actors
and actresses tell that certain levels of anxiety and stress
are able to awake in them the ability to concentrate and a
transmission talent which they do not have in normal
situations. And, what is the present time but a continuous
state of turmoil and excitement? The art has been,
fortunately or unfortunately, nurtured by many or all of the
major episodes of human seizure; signs of this are the
Picasso's Guernica or the Fusilamientos del 2 de Mayo from
Goya.

Van Gogh, Leonardo da Vinci, Mozart and Marilyn.
Matches."More nonsense. Now it's up to Van Gogh. Just a new
book that speculates about his last days of life, whether he
committed suicide or was accidentally killed.
I don’t have read the book, but I have read some notes like one
where someone asks Vincent, who was bleeding in his bed, if he
had wanted to commit suicide and he said “I think so”. And for
some persons this is a enough reason to write a book because
this answer might indicate that he did not pull the trigger.
This nonsense, and others cited in the book, justifies, without
shame, to raise a new plot that will surely give a lot of money,
because it is likely to be after converted into a film. Tangle
and dig no matter what it takes, without the least respect in
the life of someone who gave everything for nothing. It's
disgusting this hobby to create a hieroglyph which gives morbid
fascination and money for a long time. It seems to me outrageous
disrespect to the generous genius.
This is the same with Leonardo's Mona Lisa. Come and see what we
invented now or what we can discover in the hackneyed, heavy and
nothing enigmatic smile of Donna. Hey, look, I think this hair
of his hair is like a cross of a rare sect and this union of
points that I see is the trail of a powerful secret means that
Leonardo knew, even then, the existence of neutrinos. And on and
on, nonsense after another, no matter if the Mona Lisa is a
mediocre picture (beyond the use of "sfumato" as innovation),
mediocre, yes, in its historical context and others it can have
a bit interest but plastically is not too good. Never mind. They
have already managed to become it an icon based in chatter and
nonsense, and then it begins to have an interest, quite apart
from its true quality. As the image of Marilyn in pop art.
Nothing more. Poor Marilyn, how many people are still profiting
from his image and his death. I am convinced Da Vinci would be
saddened about all these matters.
Or Mozart. He and his death. Salieri and Mozart enmeshed in a
tangle mesh tarnishing forever the image of the great man,
making him look like drivel, like a clown in the, otherwise
extraordinary, film of Milos Forman's, "Amadeus". It is always
the same: to make art or intrigue whatever it costs. I always
say that art does not know morality but that does not entitle us
to crucify dogs or to make intrigues and cabals on humans who
only made to magnify our spirit giving it all they've got.

I am very sad about people do not stop to remove the ears,
bones, misery and privacy of these martyrs of art.