]]>
By: Influential conservation ecology papers of 2018 | ConservationBytes.com https://conservationbytes.com/2013/12/31/influential-conservation-papers-of-2013/#comment-106553
Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:33:58 +0000http://conservationbytes.com/?p=11216#comment-106553[…] For the last five years I’ve published a retrospective list of the ‘top’ 20 influential papers of the year as assessed by experts in F1000 Prime — so, I’m doing so again for 2018 (interesting side note: six of the twenty papers highlighted here for 2018 appear in Science magazine). See previous years’ posts here: 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013. […]

]]>
By: 100 papers that every ecologist should read | ConservationBytes.com https://conservationbytes.com/2013/12/31/influential-conservation-papers-of-2013/#comment-89461
Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:01:18 +0000http://conservationbytes.com/?p=11216#comment-89461[…] summaries of the influential conservation papers of that calendar year (e.g., 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013), as somewhat subjectively assessed by F1000 Prime experts. You might also recall that I wrote a […]

]]>
By: Influential conservation ecology papers of 2016 | ConservationBytes.com https://conservationbytes.com/2013/12/31/influential-conservation-papers-of-2013/#comment-82256
Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:35:11 +0000http://conservationbytes.com/?p=11216#comment-82256[…] I have done for the last three years (2015, 2014, 2013), here’s another retrospective list of the top 20 influential conservation papers of 2016 as […]

]]>
By: Influential conservation papers of 2015 | ConservationBytes.com https://conservationbytes.com/2013/12/31/influential-conservation-papers-of-2013/#comment-78105
Thu, 24 Dec 2015 21:05:58 +0000http://conservationbytes.com/?p=11216#comment-78105[…] I did last year and the year before, here’s another arbitrary, retrospective list of the top 20 influential conservation papers […]