Friday, March 30, 2018

The original National Socialists in Germany had to establish a
Reichsministry to bring the press under control. The American media is
voluntarily covering the backside of our glorious female fuhrer. Disgusting, isn't it?

Yes, it is.

The one thing that the willfully depraved are loathe to do is to
acknowledge the fact that there are people who are in fact better in
some respect than they are. To make such an acknowledgement is to issue
an indictment of themselves and their own actions. The willfully depraved will murder individuals or even exterminate
entire nations before they will recognize the truth about themselves.

Thursday, March 29, 2018

Has anyone else noticed that Charles Schumer is the literal embodiment
of the subject of anti-Semitic propaganda? That POS has deceived and
used the Jewish voters of New York to gain power and those same voters
will be left holding the bag when it is time to hold him accountable for
his crimes.
We know that Schumer is fully responsible for his acts, but not everyone
will be properly enlightened and innocent (or at least ignorant) people
will be wrongly punished. This is clearly wrong.

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

We must understand that Socialism is
essentially a Master/Slave ideology. If you pardon me for quoting Karl Marx, "from each according to their ability, to each
according to their needs." And for the socialists, as with the
antebellum slaveholders, the needs of the masters will always be much
greater than the needs of the slaves.

The socialist master class,
both here in the United States and abroad, basically see themselves
being dispossessed of what according to their ideology is rightfully
theirs. Control of their slaves and the products of slave labor. What
should not be a surprise to us is that the response of the socialist
master class and their supporters is in many ways similar to the actions
of the antebellum slaveholder class and their supporters.

Those
who reject the chains of the Left are subjected to public ridicule and
slander by the self-styled intellectuals and subject to physical
violence by the goon squad, with the ski-mask replacing the white sheet
as the attire of choice.

If you will pardon me for the use of
shocking language, to the master class of the Left, we who reject the
chains of Socialism are (regardless of our actual race) no better than a
bunch of "Uppity Niggers." It should be no surprise to us that they are
treating us as such.

If we want to go on the ideological
offensive (Or is it the Counter-Offensive?) we should simply point out
the fact that the socialist economic structure is based on SLAVE LABOR.

If
you will pardon me for repeating this, "from each according to his
ability -- to each according to his need." Is the literal description of
a slave labor economic system.

It is invariably the full
socialist states such as the Soviet Union, the Third Reich, and the
various People's Republics of Whatever that build and depend on
full-service slave labor camps to create the goods that they need to
survive.

It is the socialist parties in the otherwise Capitalist
nations of the West that act as if wealth, the product of everyone's
thought and labor, belong not to the individual who created it, but to
some manifestation of the collective (Der Volk, the World Proletariat,
etc.) as a whole, and thus act as if a robbery has occurred when the
true creators of wealth are allowed to keep some of it.

(Gosh, wow, I do tend to get a bit long winded sometimes.)

The
socialist is for the most part someone who declines to live the
essentially rational and productive life that is proper to Man, and
instead goes to great lengths (including the total disconnect from
reality) to cook up excuses to grab the wealth created by others. As if
the goods and services created by others were something naturally found
in nature.

Instead of living as rational men, socialists choose instead to exist as less than rational animals. Perhaps we should start treating them as such. Let's start by voting them out of office and go on from there.

Monday, March 26, 2018

I have a message for Hillary Clinton the fool who is visibly upset at the fact that we won't blindly submit to her whims.

Get over it.

Sure, you claimed to won a presidential election by a majority of the votes cast. (After all, you are a Democrat)

So what?

An election in a constitutional republic is a process of hiring someone
to perform a constitutionally defined task. It is not a mystical
collectivist ritual for the anointment of a stone age goddess. We do
not believe in The Leader Principle. We do not believe that the stone
age goddess that you have become is in any way the embodiment of a
collective will. And we certainly do not believe that we are in any way
subject to what is in fact your personal whim. We are not and never
will be a living prop in your ideological fantasy. We will not bind
ourselves with the chains that you offer us. And we will never embark on
the path that always leads to the anonymous ditch outside of a town.

What you are is a believer in what Ayn Rand used to call the Primacy of
Consciousness, a belief that reality is not inherently real but is in
some way alterable by a ruling consciousness. In your case, the
Collective, which in many versions of Socialist doctrine has a distinct
consciousness of its own. Some Leftists have gone as far as to claim
that the individual perception of actual reality, which invariably
contradicts the doctrines of the collectivists, is a form of false
consciousness.

This explains why the Hard Left has made the effort to gain control of the
Mainstream Media, and why they insist on "shaping opinion" instead of
simply reporting the facts. Your supporters in the media are through the
deliberate issuance of falsehoods trying to alter reality. But reality
is inherently real. Facts are facts. Or to put it in the simplest
terms: A is A.

The number of votes you received (or in the democrat system, claimed to
received) doesn't change the fact that you are wrong. Might (or in the democrat system, the appearance of might) is not right.

You are about to learn in the worst way that reality is not subjectto a majority vote.

Sunday, March 25, 2018

The novel 1984 was written as a warning to all of us. Not as an instruction
manual for the Democratic Party or members of Anti-fa. Control over everything and everyone
productive must be a Democrats or a member of Anti-fa wet dream.

And here's a quote about George Orwell:

The progressive left really doesn’t like the concept of Free Speech.
They want to make any speech they disagree with illegal. They use
Orwell’s 1984 as a training manual, instead of the warning it was meant
to be.

Friday, March 23, 2018

If there is one thing I have certainly noticed, it is that pacifists
in general have no objection to enjoying the benefits of civilization
but are unwilling to take the measures necessary to defend it from
foreign and domestic barbarians. Such as the National Socialists, the
Soviet Socialists, and the home grown socialists of the Democratic
Party. Contrary to their general delusion of virtue, pacifists are in
effect, moral and political parasites upon civilized society.

Peace in the real world is simply the absence of those -- such as the
socialists -- who seek to deprive you, I, and our fellow citizens of our
own Life, Liberty, and Property. Real peace can only be achieved by the
physical isolation or outright elimination of those who seek to
subjugate, plunder and murder us. This can only be done through the use
of physical force. In short, true peace can only be achieved only
through the possession of superior firepower and the moral will to use
it.

The narcissistic trash that makes up the membership of the so-called
peace movement simply do not care whether you and your children live, or
die, or suffer under the yoke of an unwashed barbarian. They plaster
their cars with bumper sticker, carry signs, bang on drums, throw
Frisbees, and perform other useless rituals so that they can feel good
about themselves and show the world how morally superior they are. Never
mind that they openly deny the fundamental fact which is the foundation
of all valid moral law, that Human Life -- life as a rational being in
control of one's own life -- is the standard of all moral values, and
that those who would damage or destroy Human Life must be removed from
human society and if necessary be destroyed. The adherents of pacifism
have so inverted their own mental processes that they look upon the
perpetrators of mass slavery and mass murder as good and those who take
up arms to defend the society of consent as the most depraved evil.

Now there are some folks, who regard themselves as morally superior
beings, who question why the other bastard has to die. The answer of
course is that the other bastard is attempting to impose his will, or
the will of his leader, upon you by force. It is the act of coercion by
force that makes what General Patton called the other bastard an enemy.
Peace is simply the absence of enemies. But there are some folks, who
pretend to be morally superior beings, who would have us believe that
"peace" could be achieved by submission to the will of the other
bastard. In reality this is not peace, it is slavery. There are some
well meaning people, some of whom that I respect, who believe that there
are times that one cannot have both peace and freedom at the same time.
I have to disagree. Liberty is simply the condition of existence in
which the person is free to live his own life in accordance with his own
rational judgment. This does of course require the absence of some
other bastard who is attempting to impose his will upon the person by
force. In practical terms real peace and real freedom are inseparable. I
will go further is saying that to a civilized person, peace, freedom,
and security, are simply three words that can be used to describe the
identical condition, the absence of another bastard imposing his will
upon the civilized person. Contrary to what those who describe
themselves as peace activists would have us believe, and as General
Patton has ably demonstrated, the path to real peace invariably takes us
over the real dead bodies of those other bastards who insist on
violently imposing their will upon us. Unfortunately this process is by
no means a safe one. Let us take this day to remember those who died
on the path to real peace.

A rational study of the real world would show that a real state of Peace
is effectively indistinguishable from a state of Liberty and a state of
Security. Peace, Liberty, and Security are simply three words that a
rational person uses to describe the same condition, the rightful
ability to live one's own life without coercive interference by others.
A rational study of actual history would show that the state of peace
for the citizens of a free nation is the result of the violent
elimination of the would be conquerors and their pet quislings. If we
rationally examine those who constitute the membership of the so-called
Peace Movement we find that virtually every one of them is an open
advocate of the coercive subjugation of the productive members of the
Human Race. The occasional exception being a self-blinded fool who isn't
paying attention to what they're ideologically in bed with. In short, a
"peace activist" and the "peace movement" are in fact enemies of Peace.

Peace is only an affirmative value to those who live in the condition of
liberty, that is being rightfully in charge of one's self and able to
set the goals for one's own life. Peace cannot be a value to the
subjects of a totalitarian socialist state. To the victim of such a
state -- the ordinary worker who is bullied by a commissar, the inmate
of a slave labor camp, or the occupant of a darkened cell awaiting
murder at the hands of the local chekists -- war, either an internal
uprising against the socialist masters, or an invasion by an army of
liberation, is in fact the positive value.

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

The advocacy of a political end cannot be separated from the advocacy the
means it is brought about. The case in this point is that the
disarming of The People requires the use of deadly force. Some advocates
of "Gun Control" do not have a problem with this. In their view
reality is subject to a vote and therefore a vote to legalize the murder
of citizens who own guns is morally correct.
But Reality is Real. Reality is not subject to a vote. And Murder is Murder. No vote by any political body can change that.
The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder. A government
that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and
devolves to a gang of criminals. And as such it must be put down by
deadly force.
And those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners must themselves be put to death.

But is gun control effective?

No.

The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the
commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One
of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As
told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ
And The Airborne Forces."

"We
landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did
so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the
fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with
sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said,
'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the
road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked
with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting
that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my
sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and
right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over.
They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from
my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole
crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let
them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next
morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just
left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found
them'."

If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the
hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is
not going to do so in Soviet America.

The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control
are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German
Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict
what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is
take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and
substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew.
Yes, it’s that obvious.

Monday, March 19, 2018

The fact of the matter is that the worst enemy of a nation and the
armed forces of a nation is the government itself. The fact of the
matter is that governing class in general decided to treat what should
have been a total war as if it were a fight between street gangs.
We are losing what is in fact the Third World War because the rulers
refuse to identify it as such. And that the cause of liberty is in fact
a holy cause. We are in fact in a holy war.
One does not prevail in a holy war by pretending that the opposing faith
is in fact valid. We can only prevail if we correctly expose the
falsehoods for which the enemy is fighting. By treating their doctrine
as false. And by systematically destroying their ideological
infrastructure of indoctrination and enforcement. And eliminate their enforcers and and indoctrinators.

And trailers for Monty Python And The Holy Grail have been recut as serious trailers, here and here.

Sunday, March 18, 2018

But Les, you're calling for the execution of the owners of Google and Youtube.

Well yes, and if we did an execution one once in a while, Pour Enbourager L'autres,
we wouldn't be facing Hillary Clinton and her followers. The last thing
The Big Bitch wants is to held accountable for her actions.

Saturday, March 17, 2018

The advocacy of a political end cannot be separated from the advocacy the
means it is brought about. The case in this point is that the
disarming of The People requires the use of deadly force. Some advocates
of "Gun Control" do not have a problem with this. In their view
reality is subject to a vote and therefore a vote to legalize the murder
of citizens who own guns is morally correct.

But Reality is Real. Reality is not subject to a vote. And Murder is Murder. No vote by any political body can change that.

The advocacy of "Gun Control" is the advocacy of Murder. A government
that legalizes Murder in this respect ceases to be a government and
devolves to a gang of criminals. And as such it must be put down by
deadly force.
And those who pushed and voted for the Murder of gun owners must themselves be put to death.

But is gun control effective?

No, it isn't.

The effectiveness of totalitarian gun control as described by the
commander of the 106th Guards Airborne Division of the Soviet Army. One
of the units sent to suppress an anti-Armenian pogrom in Azerbaijan. As
told to Carey Schofield, author of "The Russian Elite: Inside SPETSNAZ
And The Airborne Forces."

"We
landed by night, and some of our aircraft came under attack as we did
so. One carrying personnel from Tula landed with twenty-two holes in the
fuselage. The people thronging around the airfield were armed with
sub-machine guns, knives and clubs. I went over to the crowd and said,
'Look! The Army is not a cat to be swung around in the air. Clear the
road!' The KPP (Control and Command Post) of the airfield was blocked
with KRAZ and KAMAZ trucks loaded with boulders. People started shouting
that we wouldn't get through. While I was talking to the crowds my
sappers were cutting the wire fence about 200 meters to the left and
right of the KPP. I gave the crowds five minutes to think things over.
They began jeering and laughing. Within five minutes two companies from
my Ryazan regiment had crossed through the holes in the wire. The whole
crowd was ordered to lie face down. We kept them there all night, to let
them think things over. When we told them to clear off, the next
morning, nobody wanted to admit that he had come armed. They all just
left their weapons behind. So I said, 'okay, let's just say we found
them'."

If gun control doesn't keep firearms out of the
hands of criminals (genocidal criminals at that) in Soviet Russia, it is
not going to do so in Soviet America.
The fact is that some adherents of what was politely called gun control
are in fact the heirs of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German
Workers Party. As a result it has become very-very-very-easy to predict
what an advocate of public disarmament will say. All one has to do is
take any mouth dropping of Reichsminister Paul Joseph Goebbels and
substitute the words Gun Owner for the word Jew.
Yes, it’s that obvious.

I once was called a murderer by a Leftist. No Leftists are bloody murderers.

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Please remember that the so-called Palestinians are the descendants of
conquerors and collaborators and as such they have no prior claim on the land of
Israel. And because of their adherence to the doctrine of Islam, which
fully denies all of the Rights of Man, they have no claim of sovereign
rights at all.
The people of Israel have shown astounding patience in the face of the
genocidal actions of the so-called Palestinians but everyone has a
limit.

And reality cannot rewritten by the wish of anyone, no matter what
their intentions or ideology. Instead of objectively observing the real
world and thus learning how to become the master of it, liberals (or as
some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives) willfully ignore
the facts of reality and stumble about in a surreal fog from error to
error, to ultimately stumble about from disaster to disaster. The
liberals (or as some of them prefer to call themselves, progressives)
openly state their desire to rule over the whole of Humanity and then
proceed to conclusively demonstrate that they are totally unfit to do
so.

Sunday, March 11, 2018

1. The gun control people are saying that it is easier to buy firearms than groceries.No.

This is a lie.

Anyone in the State of Minnesota can buy groceries but if you have as
much as a misdemeanor on your record forget about buying a firearm. The gun control people
are lying as usual.

2. The assholes who ran the gas chambers at the Nazi death camps really thought they were the good guys, the SS-Einsatzgruppen who exterminated Jews on the Eastern Front did too. So do Social Justice Warriors and Democrats, what do we do with them?

3. You didn’t actually believe God actually rained fire and brimstone on the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, did you? Of course not. The
burning of a city is what happens when that city extends power over the
people in the area it rules over, and the people become sick and tired
of their stupid rules. So do we have to burn the cities of New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles? I’m
afraid so, we have to, the inhabitants of those cities see us as things
to be used for their benefit or as stuff to be disposed of. The
inhabitants of those cities believe that they supposedly have a
democratically granted power over us. But they don’t have the power
they believe they have over us.

4. The doctrine of Totalitarianism holds Human life in absolute
contempt and sees people as things to be used or destroyed, over the
last decades Totalitarians have enslaved numerous nations and
murdered tens of millions of people, and surrender to such people,
regardless of the circumstances, is simply not an option.

5. Is Donald Trump the Democrats president? Of course not! The Democrats president is someone who unleashes the Democrats to murder anyone they want! President Trump won't allow that. He would not allow the Democrat's to kill anyone they want. The Democrats are just another bunch of murderers who wants to kill without a proper consequence.

6. What part of Hillary Clinton is unfit for public office did the Democrats not understand?

7. The prohibition of any object (guns, drugs, or alcohol} never works.

8. If they want to know why an American citizen needs to buy an assault rifle, all a Democrat has to do is look in a mirror.

9. I do have a disagreement with President Trump. (Yes, Lefties
won't believe it, but it's the truth.) Hillary Clinton must held
accountable for her actions in public office. There's no way around it.

10. Liberals wouldn't hold any demonstrations if if they got shot doing so. And to Hell with the Left,

Saturday, March 10, 2018

Apart from a child molester, I would be hard pressed to think of
something more vile than an individual who would condemn other people to
death and bondage under socialism in order to obtain their own euphoria
fix. Not only would I not allow such an individual anywhere near a child,
I would want that individual to have the most intense and direct
experience of socialism from the victim's point of view as possible.
This would be what Steven Barry once called the Lubyanka Breakfast, a
cigarette in the morning and one pistol round in the back of the head.

Thursday, March 08, 2018

Even if it kills me I will work to establish the Heinlein system as the government of the United States.

So what is the system Heinlein described in his novel Starship Troopers?

Heinlein wrote the novel to be the part of the juvenile series of
science fiction novels published by Scribners and as a response to
pro-Soviet peace activism. In the novel a young man grows from a naive
high school student to a junior officer in the army. The narrative of
the novel also serves as the framework for a series of lectures about
the nature of man, morals, war, and government. The most controversial
concept in the novel is that not everyone should be allowed to vote. In
the place of universal suffrage Heinlein proposed the idea that the
legal status of Citizen, who is a member of the sovereign class of the
nation with the authority to vote, has to be earned.

Then as now there were people who clearly didn’t understand the
concept of government. Then as now there were those who sought to
exploit the ignorance of the mere voter in order to obtain political
power. And worse to obtain power without restraint. Heinlein had
proposed the idea of earning the sovereign franchise as a filtering
mechanism to prevent obvious fools--such as peace activists--from
influencing government.

The idea of the restricted franchise is not new. In the Polis
of Athens the franchise was restricted to property owning members of
the tribe but there was no legal restraint on the state. As history had
shown this led to dysfunctions such as legal murder of Socrates.
It was not enough to restrict the powers of government but to restrict
who could actually participate in the process of governing. In effect
to idiot-proof the system.

So is it actually necessary to fully implement the system that Heinlein proposed?

The fact is that all forms of authority are based on knowledge and
political authority is no exception. But in the present system political authority is granted to any warm
body without regard to their the actual state of knowledge. As a result
some warm bodies have traded their votes for a material object such as
an IPad or a wad of cash. Or worse they have traded their votes for the
warm and fuzzy feeling of having been compassionate.

The result is out present state of our nation. Those who lack knowledge
or simple concern for consequences should not have authority over
another person, let alone the fate of a nation.

My solution to the problem is simply proper education in the obligations of citizenship.

The course would be similar to a driver education course as presently
taught. The first part of the class covers The Constitution, the proper
functions of each branch of government, the function of each clause and
amendment, the duties of the citizen as a member of the sovereign authority of the
nation, and what is expected to happen when the Federal Government enters the failure mode.

The second part of the course covers the function and use of the
instrument of political authority, the personal weapon. This covers
rifle marksmanship and maintenance. Also covered is the basic
organization and tactics of the citizen militia unit.

While the citizenship course will not be mandatory, completion and a
passing grade will be required to exercise the authority to vote.

Wednesday, March 07, 2018

The Hard Left in its fundamental form is a group of essentially parasitic
beings that wish to demolish the present consent-based American
social-economic structure and replace it with a coercion-based political
order that they regard as morally superior. Unfortunately for us the
Hard Left's ideal version of America strongly resembles a Überkonzentrationlager
with themselves as the commandants and overseers. Anyone who stands in
the way of the Left in their quest to subjugate the American republic,
policeman, citizen soldier, or President Trump, are rhetorically blasted
as being the vilest of monsters while those who have consistently
demonstrated their hatred of American liberty such as Hillary Clinton are worshiped as though they were the enactors of the divine will.

Tuesday, March 06, 2018

As a consequence there are things that the Left will not tolerate. The Left will not tolerate the independent exercise of force,
especially when it is an act of self defense. The left seeks to disarm
their subjects and will maliciously persecute those who dare raise a
hand in their own defense. Nor will the Left tolerate the existence and operation of the
independent rational mind, for any factual refutation of any of the
Left's beliefs will inevitably puncture their collective delusion of
infallibility. Anyone who thinks for himself, let alone actually speaks
up against the Left is publicly maligned and, where it is possible,
physically assaulted. In Rouge Kampuchea under Pol Pot the fear and hatred of independent
thought was so strong that anyone who was suspected of being able to
read was immediately taken out and shot. And as the Khmer Rouge ran up
their bodycount leftist rags in America like the New York Times sat by
and cheered them on.

Sunday, March 04, 2018

If there is one myth that I would really like to bury, it is the myth
that National Socialism is a right wing ideology, and that the NSDAP and
those in the present day who seek to emulate them are right wing
parties.

"We
are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system
for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries,
with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and
property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all
determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

Someone on the Left could repeat the above statement word for word and no one
in the usual leftist audience or the Main Stream Media would call them
out on it.

Saturday, March 03, 2018

From the collectivist view a person is simply a thing to be used, a
tool, the fact that a person has a complete life outside of the alleged
goals of the collective is completely blanked out. To the collectivist
the full human life is completely meaningless.
And because a person is seen as simply a tool it does not matter if it
breaks as a result of being misused. The tool can simply be disposed of
and replaced.

Thursday, March 01, 2018

Throughout its history the fundamental value of the Democratic Party was power. As with the Communists and National Socialists in Eurasia they had sought absolute power over everyone in their domain, the United
States of America. And as with the predecessors the power over their
victims was exercised without any restraint whatsoever. As a result it
has become absolutely necessary to remove the Democratic Party from power
and permanently eliminate the basic structure and the intellectual
infrastructure (Mainstream Media) that supported it.