There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Hi folks, I’m Alan
Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 20th of March 2009.

I advise newcomers
to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, where you can download lots of
previous talks I've given on the big picture of that which runs the world: the
big real government and there really is one too, that runs the world already,
has been for a long time, an international group who, basically, run
international banks, dictate politics and policies to all the nations and who
want their global society, a perfect global society, where there's going to be
a front organisation, as the government for the whole world. And, of course, a
planned society, like family planning, one big global village, where we're all
on family planning, you might say. I try to give you information, from their
own documents, and books, by some of the bigger players or front men that
they've used down through history, to voice their opinions to the public;
because they do need our cooperation. You'll find amongst the public too,
there's a lot of people on board, because they have no minds of their own, they
like the idea of a utopia, it sounds nice and it's like a perpetual childhood,
where someone, above you is always going to be making the big decisions for
you; and you don't have to worry your pretty little head, just enjoy yourself,
watch soaps and sports and you'll be quite ok. That's the sad truth of
it.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks I give, which you can print up (and
they're written in the various languages of Europe), you can pass them round to
your friends as well.

You can also keep
me going by buying my books and discs from www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and you can also donate as well, that trickles in and that's
how I survive on what I'm doing. I don't ask money from the advertisers; and I
depend upon you the listeners to keep me ticking along here; and that's all it
is: ticking, until there's no more ticks left, then there'll be no more speech
and freedom of speech is going down the tubes fast, very fast. There are very
few stations on this planet that can allow people to give alternate points of
view outside the mainstream; and RBN is one of them. There are very-very few;
most countries don't have these kinds of networks available to the public where
you can pretty-well say what you want.

I've often said
that nothing happens in this world on a large-scale by accident, I don't fall
for the fact that it's just big money at play and greed and corruption. That's
all part of it but that's at the lower level, the boys at the top do know what
they're doing. They don't leave things to chance; and it's like the IPCC,
that's the United Nations group of scientists, paid scientists that are all
cheerleaders basically, who turn up the desired reports on global warming and
all the coming catastrophes that spew out of their specially built computers. I
call them ‘crisis computers’ - they're guaranteed to give you a crisis no
matter what you feed in.

You also have the
ones to do with genetic manipulation of all the foods. It's astonishing, isn't
it, that really no country has put everything on a slow investigative journey
into genetic engineering of foods. As I say, in Canada, we didn't find out that
we were even getting tested for it, they were using it on the population of
Canada, for ten years; ten years went by, before it leaked out of Britain, that
we were the test guinea pigs for the rest of the world, to see what effects
they would have on the human body. And, by the way, they haven't given us any
results on that yet; although, if you ask your pharmacist what's popular these
days, it gives you a clue. And I'll talk about this when I come back; it's a
very important topic, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, this is
Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and before the break, I was
talking about the modified food and how Canadians were the guinea pigs, because
the government admitted later that they'd made a secret deal with the big
companies, GMO boys, to grow the stuff and put it out into the food supply.
And, of course, the government, obviously, was monitoring the health
effects on the public; and it was about the same time, in fact, that they
admitted they had a super computer in Ottawa that was linked to all facilities
across Canada - and since we have a national health service type system, all
data on medical records was fed in, along with every other bit of personal
information of course, long before 9/11 came along. They could obviously take
account of the side effects and what was on the increase and the decrease and
all the rest of it. If you ask your pharmacist what's popular today, he'll tell
you it's all the antacids and the acid-suppressant agents that are just getting
smacked and whacked off the shelves, since, basically, these foods came in,
because they added all kinds of foreign genes to them, genes from insects and
animals and who knows, maybe even humans, for all we know. We'll never ever get
to the real story too, but why would, as I say, bio-warfare experts be involved
in making your food? Because, that's what these guys at the top are all about,
that's what they set up many years ago, was to do with genetic engineering, for
warfare purposes; that should make us all wonder and worry. And we do know that
they want to depopulate the planet and bring them down to a safe manageable
level and then create new types of humans; that's been in all the science magazines
for the last few years, quite openly. It's like something out of a science
fiction but why should it be, since science fiction is only the programming for
what's to come.

This article here
is from the Guardian.co.uk. Now, remember that every newspaper now has its
green specialist, their environment specialist you see; so they make their
bread and butter, these characters who write these stories, on the scare
tactics. You've always got to wonder why, is there another ulterior motive for
this particular article etc, etc. Especially recently, when they had all of
these fear mongers together at the world climate change group and they’ve
literally admitted that they were all told to put out the worst case scenarios
across the world, because all their funding depends on fear you see, to keep
the whole thing going. And since the Club of Rome decided in the 1970s that
this was going to be the agenda: man was at war against the planet, the planet
was at war against him, therefore 'man was the enemy' idea, in their own book,
which they published in the '90s, they admitted in the '70s, they dreamed up
the idea of global warming, then we know that a lot is counting on this global
warming and weather / climate change idea, to change the whole world and the
way we behave. It's really a form of control over the entire planet; right down
to the individual, as to whatever you do will be tied in with the environment
you see. So, as I say, be careful when you read these articles and this is one;
this is by John Vidal who is the environment editor, his bread and butter,
right? It's about GMO food:

The world's leading crop scientists issued a stark warning that a deadly
airborne fungus could

“Could” – right?

devastate wheat harvests in poor countries and lead to famines and civil
unrest over significant regions of central Asia and Africa.

Ug99 — so called because it was first seen in Uganda in 1999 — is a new
variety of an old crop disease

“A new variety of
an old crop disease”; so, is that modified maybe?

called "stem rust", which spread from Africa to Iran and it's
blighted wheat production in many parts of the world for thousands of years. It
was first seen in 1999

But they say here:
“it's blighted wheat production for many thousands of years”. It's fantastic,
these scientists are amazing characters. It says:

The fungus was thought to have largely disappeared since the 1960s when
original disease-resistant varieties were developed and planted in the West and
developing countries.

They're talking
about modified stuff.

Scientists meeting in Mexico to exchange information on the Ug99 are
alarmed because Eg99 specifically targets resistant genes in wheat, as a
result, it is now believed that 80-90% of all wheat varieties grown in
developing countries are susceptible to the new fungus.

Now, here's the
kicker: you see, anyone who's followed the GM food, especially wheat and corn
and so on, knows that most of the planet is on the modified varieties; and this
leads me back to what I said at the very beginning of the show, nothing happens
by accident. It's not just greed and power at the top, they do look to the
future, they don't make big mistakes; and yet, other geneticists, before they
started introducing this stuff into the general farming communities across the
planet, warned that if everything became the same variety of corn, the same
variety of wheat etc etc, like one size fits all and displaced the traditional
grains in their own regions, which had developed over thousands of years, each
one, for that region, then all the wheat and all the corn etc would be wiped
out. If you have 15 varieties growing in one field, which you used to have,
across a good part of the world, when something hit it, it wouldn't wipe out
all the different varieties, it would wipe out maybe one and the rest was there
to be saved, that was traditional. Now they've all gone to the standard stuff,
the whole lot is wiped out; so, this was foreseen, as I say, by scientists,
before they started to hand this out into the communities. And you know one of
the biggest culprits was the United Nations organisation, who encouraged the
distribution of foods into these countries, in so-called Third World countries,
across the world and across the Middle East; and they gave them lots, through
their NGOs and different groups and charitable groups, gave them all this stuff
that was going to be so much easier. And it was, for two or three years, until
the effects started to show up; so, was this deliberate? Because, after all,
remember, in warfare, food is one of the primary weapons; it has to make you
wonder, doesn't it? It says:

Ug99 is particularly dangerous because it can infect crops very quickly
and releases vast clouds of invisible spores which can be carried by the wind
for hundreds of miles.

It's a perfect
bio-warfare thing isn't it?

The Nobel prize-winner Norman Borlaug, who is credited with helping
India and other countries avoid famines in the 1960s by developing high
yielding crop strains, said: "This thing has immense potential for social
and human destruction. It is capable of severely damaging virtually all of the
world's commercial bread wheat. It is a problem that goes far beyond wheat
production in developing countries. Sooner or later it will be found throughout
the world, including North America, Europe, Australia and South America."

And on and on it
goes and, as I say, this was foreseen by thinking scientists who were not
employed by the big boys, famous enough in their own right, but no one wanted
to hear at the top because there's an agenda at work you see. Whenever there's
an agenda at work, they listen to the scientists that they employ, for the
agenda, like the IPCC for instance. That's the difference; they warned that if
they went ahead and did this, this is the result they'd have and we're seeing
it across the world now.

In Australia, part
of the problem isn't just drought, it's the fact that they've all been on the
GM modified corn etc., wheat, for years. It was fine for the first few years,
like it always is and then odd things start happening and they can't withstand
the dry periods and so on and so on and so on it goes. What's also interesting
is that, off the coast of Norway, as we all know, I'm sure the listeners know,
it's been in all the major papers for months and months, they keep adding to
the stock of the natural grains they've taken from these little countries they
then dumped in the GMO strains and they've got all the natural stuff there, for
the future, to make sure that someone in the future survives, I wonder who it
will be? I wonder who it will be? Quite something.

We've all been
through what happened with Ireland, with the Lisbon Treaty, for the EU. It was
the only dissenter, supposedly, going against this EU Charter, this final
Charter of theirs'. After that, they were threatened, basically, by other
members of the EU, saying all the things that would happen to Ireland, left
behind and all the bad consequences would come; and, very quickly, it was
followed by a massive contamination of their meat products, because some
strange substance - like PCBs - somehow got into all the cattle feed, you know,
those little reconstituted things they sell that's like dog food in those big
bags. So, it came from a firm or a company from somewhere, obviously, to get in
there and they had to recall millions of pounds worth of their food, almost
bankrupted the farmer. Now, the farmer and the rural people, were the ones
blamed for not signing the treaty, they were going against the treaty, in the
first place, so it's amazing how it hit them first. Then they had the economic
crash on top of it just to further sink them; although, really, they were
technically bankrupted before - in another fiasco. This is from Friday March the 20th 2009. It says here, from this
article I'm reading here. It says:

EU leaders agree €5bn economic stimulus package

Then it says, this
is from the Irish times, I think it is:

THE GERMAN ambassador to Ireland has defended remarks he made at a
cultural event in Tralee, Co Kerry, in which he warned of the consequences of a
second rejection of the Lisbon Treaty.

So, here they are
being threatened really; what's a warning and what's a threat eh?

Christian Pauls was reported to have told an audience gathered for the
official launch of a partnership between Tralee and the Frankfurt- Höchst
Schlossfest that Ireland would “throw away its future” if it voted No in a
second referendum on the treaty.

“Throw away it's
future”.

Ireland could not have an a la carte approach to Europe and simply pick
and choose what it liked, he said, according to local media reports of the
event which took place on Monday.

And I'll continue
with these little threats in this great democracy, because it's a forerunner of
what's to come to the Americas, as we can all see coming actually.

Back with more -
after this break.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt,
we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Irish Times,
concerning the comments made by the German ambassador to Ireland on them
turning down the EU Charter; and pretty-well warning them what's going to
happen if they don't sign it the next time around. It says here:

The ambassador was also said to have noted that rural regions such as
Kerry returned a much higher No vote than urban areas in last year’s referendum.

It's a farming
community you see.

He reportedly made pointed references to those who “complain about other
nations fishing in their waters. . . and forget who pays their milk
subsidies”.

The reason I'm
reading this out is, I hope, in the US, they understand what this union of the
Americas is going to be; you have no idea of the multi-layered new
bureaucracies you're going to have sitting on top of you, to do with all
transactions, in everything that you buy and you sell. And where the taxes go
and new taxes and how they divvy them up to the new central overall government
and so on; it's terrifying, it's terrifying. Who can fish where; can foreigners
come in and fish in your water? etc etc. All this goes on and on and on, until,
basically, everyone's hamstrung, they can't move, without permission from some
higher bureaucrat. This is exactly what Carl Jung talked about as early as the
1930s, when he saw this and he repeated it again, in 1945 and '46, he said
"I see the world being stifled by a ring around the world”, later he
called it an iron curtain, about the time that the iron curtain was set up at
the end of World War II. He said an iron curtain that would, literally, squeeze
the life out of all the inhabitants of the planet. Many people saw this coming,
because they understood the agenda, in their own time. You can't move without
permission, on anything. It says:

Informed of the reports yesterday, Mr Pauls told The Irish Times that
while he could not recall using “those exact words”, he admitted that he had
said “something along those lines” at the event. “The reports make it sound
like I was lecturing Ireland and the Irish but it was not meant to be
aggressive or demeaning,” he said. “A second No would have horrific
consequences for Ireland

"horrific
consequences for Ireland", oh, horrific.

and I am not the first to say it. I don’t think there is anything
particularly new in that.”

It's quite amazing,
you either pay the big boys, it's like the Mafia moving in; you either pay the
extortion fees and do what they say, and they might leave you a little bit
alone, a little bit alone, they want to know everything you're doing, but a
little bit of freedom to yourself. That's what it is, that's what power really
is you see, that is what governments actually are: they are fearful masters,
as Washington said. And it's up to the public how much of it they'll tolerate.
Most of the public, as the ones at the top understand perfectly well, will
accept anything, including being put into a ditch and shot, if need be. That's
happened over and over and over, because they will not believe it's really
happening to them. We're taught to obey, obey, obey; and since the '50s and
'60s and speeding up, you have, really, a Western world of perpetual children,
their lives are perpetual childhood and the media and the education system has
ensured that it is so. There's no doubt about that.

At one time, you
could go to elderly people, who were not brought up by television and magazines
and the nonsense from Hollywood and so on and the gossip magazines; and you
could sit for hours listening to how they saw the world, because they'd thought
for themselves. They had wisdom to pass on; now, you can go into the old age
homes and see the generation that were brought up on TV and they have nothing
to pass on. Their topics are all about their little life, themselves, their
offspring or family and what's on TV etc. The shows that they like watching,
all fantasy, it's all fantasy, all fantasy, we forget that; and most people don't
know it, the war has been on them since before they were born and they don't
even know it was declared upon them. What we're seeing with people who can't
understand what's going on or they say 'I don't want to know', they can't see
the Chemtrails above their heads, those people are the causalities of this war,
that's what you're seeing, casualties. Because the intent, as Arthur Koestler
said, and it's admitted now, in one of the books I read recently, it's now
declassified, he worked for MI5 and MI6, like most of the big authors did, he
did a lot of predictive programming in his novel works, he also did non-fiction
as well. He also said that he worked with an organisation at the United Nations
that looked into ways of lobotomising the people, the public of the world and
they had tried all kinds of methods and the one that they thought was the best
was a chemical that could either be injected or put into the water, target that
part of the brain that makes you you; the part of the brain that gives you your
survival capabilities. He says they won't need that anymore, because the State
will be making all your decisions for you. That was to get world peace; he says
it had to be done, for world peace. So, when you hear the word
"peace" and "world peace" you'd better understand their
definition of it. In Communism, it meant a lack of all opposition.

I'll be back with
more, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt, this
is Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing the various high issues that we're
allowed to know about; in this day and age, most of the things that go on,
we're not allowed to know about. What we do know, and I've said this many
times, is whenever a Bill is put forward that you're a bit suspicious of, you
should really-really protest it, because you’ll always find that once it goes
through there's another agenda at work and it expands to include things that
you'd never ever imagine in your wildest nightmares. Because the bill that was
passed recently, I talked about it yesterday, to with mandatory volunteerism
for all youths. It's a re-creation really of a sort of Brownshirt society or
the Greenshirts, no doubt this time, with political indoctrination into the
youth, who will grow up to bash the older ones around, with big truncheons or
special taser guns or something, whatever they have in the very near future,
some high-tech. stuff. And it's a spy society as well, it's the internal army
really that Obama was talking about; no matter how you describe it or what you
call it, it's always the same thing, they always go for the youth in a
socialist time. Remember the Socialists and the Communists and the Fascists are
all really one big group, it's one group that uses Left and Right, Left and
Right, down through the ages, to always go in the same direction.

And I've said before that Mr.
Bush's job was to set up the machinery to get the troops on the streets and so
on and everyone spied upon and Obama’s put in to actually use it. And that's
why too they decided now to crash the economy, they could have kept the same
scam going, I mean, after all, how much air do you need to blow a bubble up?
They could keep it going for as long as they wanted to; it's always been based
on the same thing. However, it's now that they want to bring it down because
the whole world is to change with it and all these new policies from the United
Nations are coming into play at the same time. That's your big clue that it was
all planned this way. The one to do again with mandatory volunteerism had
amendments that were not mentioned, to it and I'll put the links up on my site,
after the show, to the amendments. It's quite interesting, because what the
Bill says:

H.R.1388, back to the House with an
amendment

Etc etc, there's a whole bunch
of other Bills you see actually tacked onto this. If you're called up for this
mandatory service, or if you voluntarily join it, you belong to a Corps you
see. A Corps is a military organisation, so you'd be subject to the same
conditions as the military. It says here:

‘‘SEC. 125. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS

You can’t join
them, they'll tell you what's allowable and what's not; and it says here:

‘‘(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—A participant in an approved national
service position under this subtitle may not engage in the following
activities:

‘‘(1) Attempting to influence legislation.

I guess all the
lobbyist children will be exempt.

‘‘(2) Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or
strikes.

‘‘(5) Engaging in partisan political activities, or other activities
designed to influence the outcome of an election to any public office.

‘‘(6) Participating in, or endorsing, events or activities that are
likely to include advocacy for or against political parties, political
platforms, political candidates, proposed legislation, or elected
officials.

Here's another
one:

‘‘(7) Engaging in religious instruction,

Did you know that?
Very sneaky isn't it?

‘‘(7) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services,
providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious
instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to
religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or
inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form
of religious proselytization.

In other words:
preaching converts. Or:

‘‘(8) Providing a direct benefit to—

‘‘(A) a business organized for profit;

I guess that's the
government.

‘‘(B) a labor organization;

‘‘(C) a partisan political organization;

‘‘(D) a nonprofit organization that fails to comply with the
restrictions

In other words: the
UN ones are ok.

contained in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code

Etc etc, the list
goes on and on and on. They're going to list all the ones you're ineligible to
participate under. There will be exceptions and they'll all be the
goody-two-shoes, the green ones, because, after all, they're going to get their
instruction from the greenies at the top, to be good greenies, that's why.

Very sneaky; and
that's what I'm saying you know, how can you fight these kind of things? How
can you fight it when most politicians, whether it's in Britain, France,
Germany or Canada, Australia, New Zealand or any of the European countries, the
politicians don't even read these massive Bills. And apart from that: how could
you read all of that stuff in a day or two? You can't, it's designed that way;
so, all the politicians are, are a front organisation, to pretend that you have
something called democracy, that's all, it's pretty sad.

Now, on Channel
Four, and I'll leave the link up too, there was a member of Parliament denied
access, Parliament from Britain, he's been in for about ten years I think,
called Galloway and he was denied access to come to Canada, to talk, because
the Jewish Defence League, apparently, had complained to the Immigration Bureau
and you'll see this exchange of words between Mr. Galloway and the leader of
the Jewish Defence League for Canada, via Channel 4, between the mediator and
Channel 4. It's quite interesting because, I think what he's accused of is
giving support to Hamas. Anthony Wedgwood Benn, who was a life-long politician,
has tapes up, actually videos up of his interviews with the BBC when he did the
same thing. They didn't want him to give out the address of where to send funds
or aid to the survivors in Gaza; and, supposedly, what Mr. Galloway is accused
of – it’s hard to tell from this exchange – is supporting Hamas, which is
supposedly listed as a terrorist organisation. And it's an odd state of
affairs, because as far as Mr. Benn said, Hamas is the only elected government
that they have. It's one of those grey areas, I'm not an expert in that whole
area at all; however, it's worth seeing the exchange going on, when again,
private organisations, can demand from the Canadian Government who they can let
in and who they will not let in. That's maybe the kicker.

Now, we'll go to
the phone calls and we have Umar from Detroit, are you there Umar?

Umar: Yes sir,
Alan, you got a great show and I listen to you, you're one of the only ones I'm
listening to now besides [? inaudible], you put out some very relevant
information but one thing I think we need to address more is what can we do to
circumvent these people? Or don’t you think there’s anything that can be
done?

Alan: Well, that's
the big question isn't it? That's the big question because - now if politics
was real and democracy was real, we'd maybe have a chance, but you see, it's
not real at all, it's too huge. The candidates are lifers, see Stonewall
Jackson said that, he tried to bring a Bill forward to stop any politician from
getting in for a second term. It would be 4 or 5 years maximum and you're gone,
you can never get back into it. When you get life-long politicians, belonging
to Parties, these people are worse than any religious fanatic. It's their Party
forever, and whatever the top man says is what they will say; and so we don't
really have democracy, we don't have representatives that stand up for their
own people, in their own area, that's the problem right there. The whole
idea,

Umar: Have you read
Unintended Consequences?

Alan: Yes.

Umar: By John Ross,
that probably, something like that's going to have to take place, before these
politicians realise that it is the people that is the boss of this country, not
them.

Alan: Well, you're
right on there, because they've spent quite a long time now, maybe since the
'50s onwards, on a roll, gradually, bringing up again, a generation, that's all
you need, who very subtly at first, but on a roll eventually, get conditioned
to believe that government is all powerful and that you do what government
tells you. There's a limit to what the government is supposed to do, they're
supposed to, you're right, they're supposed to be there to serve the people who
elect them; and that's just like outer space or the Twilight Zone, I've never
seen that in my lifetime.

Umar: I got a quick
question for you and then I'm going to let you go. Have you heard of the
Neo-Tech by Frank Wallace?

Alan: Neo-Tech? I
think I may have but I'm not quite certain of it.

Umar: It's
something like an Objectivist philosophy, something similar to Ayn Rand, it
espouses, to me, a lot of new world order concepts like they don't believe in
God, they believe like believing in God is mysticism and so on like that. They
say some good things but you know, it's kind of like I'm listening to it and it
sounds like something I had heard somewhere else. Just like Zeitgeist, that
thing you talked about the other night.

Alan: Yes, you find
that they have to say things which hook you in, that you can relate to, and
then they put their twists in there; you're right on, that's how that stuff is
given to the public.

Umar: Well, Alan, I
know you're busy and I know there's so many other people calling you, so I'm
going to sign off for now, it's good speaking with you again. Stay
strong.

Rick: This is in
response to Zeitgeist, because after Wednesday's show, I went and watched the
movie; and it reminded me of, it was like watching H.G Wells' and one thing
they never mentioned in the film was that all the things, that the very people
that they are bashing, the Capitalists, are the very ones who are proposing the
very vision that they were proposing!

Alan: Absolutely
and they skirted round all the topics of well, how would they get rid of
poverty; you see these wonderful shiny dome-like cities and, of course, the
dome is the in-thing for the future at the United Nations. Very few cars on the
road, where's all the people? It's obviously a much smaller society, what
happened to the people?

Rick: They don't
talk about if they were sterilised or they got killed off, they don't even
mention that. This guy he seemed creepy too, the guy who was part of the Venus
project, I wonder who they're funded by?

Alan: Yes, well
there'll be somebody that loves them, I'm sure.

Rick: One other
thing I want to mention is I bought a book recently by Malthus and it had his
introduction and I started reading the first couple of chapters and there were
the philosophers of influence on Malthus and one of them called Wallace I
think, in England. And he was saying that a lifestyle where people were
decadent produces less population.

Alan: That's
correct, they understood that by watching; see, Rome eventually was so
decadent, even amongst the aristocracy that produced the ruling class, they
passed laws to make them breed with each other, because they were turning into
deviant ways, more women with women and men with men and having no children to
take over. So, they understood this from the ancient history and these guys do
nothing but study history, to learn.

Rick: I wanted to
ask about the Bible, you know, it seems like the Bible, a lot of the rules in
there about sex and stuff are geared toward the elite almost, it seems like a
eugenics book sometimes when you read it.

Alan: Yes, well,
the Bible is a genetics book, it starts off with Gene, Genesis, and it's all
begetting, who begets who, to create a special people, that's what it's about,
you know and that's nothing new in ancient times, because, again, even the
Pharaohs sometime married their sisters, to keep everything in the family, keep
all the power there. Even before that, we know that Sumer was doing the same
thing. Elite families have always been into special breeding, selective
breeding, specially selected by priesthoods, who kept the genealogies of them.
And that's what you have today, I mean, who picks the kings and queens, even
for Europe? I can remember when Prince Charles suddenly came into the limelight
as being the most eligible bachelor on the planet, as they tried to build up an
image for him and when they eventually found Diana, it was said that she was
chosen for him. He never knew her.

Alan: Yes, it's
astonishing, but nothing's really new, it's just our perceptions are distorted
through propaganda until we don't recognise the same thing down through time.

Another thing too:
I'll put a link up on Channel 4 to do with Mr. Bush's last speech he gave, his
farewell address, it's actually incredibly funny because he's been quite the
character for his statements and he did say, he said this actually, and this
was in January, I think it was (12th January 2009):

In the last press conference of his administration George Bush describes
the failure to find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq as a
"significant disappointment".

Ho ho, to say that,
you see all the photographs of the slaughtered people and the bodies across the
plains, it was a "significant disappointment, he says.

In what Mr Bush called the "ultimate exit interview", he also
admitted that flying a "Mission Accomplished" banner aboard a US
aircraft carrier was a mistake. After eight years which will be remembered for
its disastrous foreign wars, an economic crisis of global proportions and the
most unpopular presidency in living memory, this was President Bush's final
chance to set his record straight.

I'll put the link
up and you can have a kind of sardonic chuckle at this, because there’s really
nothing to laugh at, is there? There's nothing to really laugh at
all.

And we've got Vince
from Newfoundland, are you there Vince?

Vince: Yes, I'm
here.

Alan: Yes, go
ahead.

Vince: Hi, I just
wanted to say thank you for everything that you've done and I'd like to tell
everyone to do whatever you can to help keep Alan on going. Me and my friend
had a flea market about a month ago and we tried to raise some money and I say
if most people could just sell all their stuff that they don't need anymore and
just help Alan out.

Alan: I'm glad you
called and told them that because I always forget to say that myself.

Vince: Could I go,
you know, after the commercial?

Alan: Sure, just
hang on; I'll get back to you, after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I'm Alan
Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix and we're talking to Vince from
Newfoundland, are you still there Vince?

Vince: I’m still
there.

Alan: Yes, go
ahead.

Vince: I just
wanted to say also that if you donate, you could order Alan's books and I will
tell you, they just change your mind; and that's the basis of my next two
questions: I think the first one is pretty simple. Based on what I've learned
about your way of kind of teaching how to think like a Mason, you know, their
language and their coding, I thought of the word Icon and I thought it was the
con of eye. Would that be some kind of a code there?

Alan: Everything
that begins with con and - unfortunately even con-stitution - the statute of
the con, the statute is a con! There were even debates about constitutions in
America, after their war because they understood that: how could any other
party give the people rights or freedoms? They were self-evident; you wouldn't
need it written down. If it's written down, the lawyers can go to work on it
and change it. If it's in the minds and the hearts of the people, the people
can always stand up for it. It's a psychological twist.

Vince: All
psychology.

Alan: And the same
with the money thing, I mean here you have Madoff, and he made off with the
money and then you have the guy that the treasury puts in charge of
distributing all the cash, from the tax payer to the bankers and his name is
Kashkari! Then there's another guy
involved who's called Conway in the same scam, the way of the con. I mean, you
couldn't make this stuff up in a comedy. It's right there, but that's what they
give us; that's what they give us for mainstream media.

Vince: And it's all
over, I'm seeing a lot of things and my favourite show is Family Guy and it's
all over Family Guy. All these characters like Peter Griffin, I was just
reading about the Griffin in your book and what that represents and you can
just go on and on and on.

Alan: That's right;
and even old stuff they used to give used to give us, Andy, Andy Griffin was
Andy of Mayberry, the berry of May, Mayday, you know. Mayday's the big thing in
the occult. I mean we watch all this stuff and the Aunt was Aunt Bee, the busy
bee and we sit and laugh at this stuff and we don't realise these are all
Masonic jokes.

Vince: It is and I
just picked up a bottle of Arizona iced tea that said it's made from Suebee
honey. I just thought it was a Masonic name as well, but I just wondered what
it meant.

Alan: It's
fascinating, utterly fascinating and that's what they mean, you see they give
you the rules in the Old Testament, that every word will condemn you, if you
don't understand what you're saying in a court, you'll be condemned, you're
condemning yourself. You think you're talking normally, naturally but actually
you're condemning yourself, that's why they have lawyers.

Vince: Yes, my
friend's father's a lawyer and I can tell by how carefully he speaks to normal
people, it just passes from his job into real life. And I got one more thing:
it's something that I think is important and you touch on and you mention in
your book about the Binary Logic and, to me, it seems like just that alone and
so subtle can really kind of dumb people down, I guess. Make them think oh it's
either this or that, you're either with us or you're with the, I hate to say
the T word but you know?

Alan: Yes. Well,
you take Binary: you've got Binar, which is an anagram of Rabin
- a Rabin; a priest, right there. A priest is someone who wears a woman's
dress, so he is basically the 0-1, the 1-0.

I hear the music
coming in and this hour's rushed in again, like it always does, so call again.

Vince: Thank
you.

Alan: And from
myself and Hamish, from Ontario, Canada: it's goodnight and may your god or
your gods go with you.