Originally posted by JC951t Hi Planet,
As per your advice that the 167E would sound better,
would it be feasible to build a 2X 167e in the G Chang
cabinets ?

Thank you

Scott might say, "groan" - these enclosures are highly tailored to specific drivers, generally intending to adhere to the Single Driver approach. Just because there might be enough room on the front baffle to add extra or different drivers, won't ensure enhanced performance.

p.s. Did I forget to mention "combing"?

but then again, I could be all wet

Quote:

Originally posted by JC951t Hi Hm,
Nice. Is this a la Isobarik configuration ?

no - each driver loads a separate horn

p.s. - sorry Horst, I didn't mean to step on your toes

__________________
this retirement thing is harder than it looks for some folks

Originally posted by chrisb
[B]Scott might say, "groan" - these enclosures are highly tailored to specific drivers, generally intending to adhere to the Single Driver approach. Just because there might be enough room on the front baffle to add extra or different drivers, won't ensure enhanced performance.

p.s. Did I forget to mention "combing"?

but then again, I could be all wet

No groans today (I'm not feeling well enough to even do that), but yes, agreed on all counts. Assuming it was retuned, you could run two drivers on the front baffle & roll one off above its mass-corner, but that's about it -aside from Calhoun none were designed for a semi-omni polar response so sticking a driver elsewhere isn't going to work too well.