Details

Description

Currently, we are using a rather ghetto http client based on fsockopen. While it works, it is not very pretty and we should look into swapping it out for a proper backend or even make the backend exchangeable and offer different transports.

Matt Ingenthron
added a comment - 27/Oct/11 8:57 PM Jan had suggested this for 2.1. I'm wondering if this is something we really should do in 2.0? Please kick it to 2.1 if you're sure that's the right place.