Majority of fans believe Marquez won at least two, and that's before the KO. Also, Mayweather beat Marquez decisively. The number of times he's faced them is irrelevant. That just means he couldn't seal the deal or lost.

The ones in bold are shared opponents.

Then we have Clottey and Margarito. Mayweather would make mince-meat out of either one. No one puts Clottey in the ranks of the greats, so I don't know why he's considered such a great win for Pacquaio -- oh yeah, he's Pacquaio, that's why.

Majority of fans believe Marquez won at least two, and that's before the KO. Also, Mayweather beat Marquez decisively. The number of times he's faced them is irrelevant. Just means he couldn't seal the deal or lost.

The ones in bold are shared opponents.

Then we have Clottey and Margarito. Mayweather would make mince-meat out of either one. No one puts Clottey in the ranks of the greats, so I don't know why he's considered such a great win for Pacquaio -- oh yeah, he's Pacquaio, that's why.

So that leaves Barrera and Morales.

You miss the point IF you only look at wins/losses.
(& you don't understand competition)

its not better he has some good names on it but mayweather beat del la hoya, hatton, mosely. not to mention he made all a majority of his fights at catch weights so naw his resume isnt that great its just padded.

I was agreeing with you, friend. Did you see all of those world-beaters I just named? Any one of them would give Mayweather trouble. Panomdej Ohyuthanakorn would probably KO him with a jab; guy's a beast.