I had an AI to propose a solution to 211 that was in the definition of
Binding Operations, rather than Binding Message References, and in
clearer prose.
Add this after the third paragraph ("For each Binding Operation...") of
2.11.1:
For each Binding Message Reference in the {message references} property
of a Binding Operation component, there MUST be an Interface Message
Reference with the same {message label} and {direction} properties in
the corresponding Interface Operation. Note that the converse is not
required; i.e., there need not be a Binding Message Reference
corresponding to each Interface Message Reference in the Interface
Operation component.
--
Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO BEA Systems