As claims of a Maine connection to last weekend’s terrorist attack on a Kenyan shopping mall have become more dubious, voices within the state’s Somali refugee community have grown louder and angrier.

They want to know why newspapers, TV stations and politicians so quickly repeated allegations from an obscure Twitter account that Somali-Americans from Maine and other places in the U.S. had helped carry out the attack.

Additional Photos

Mohammed Dini, director of the African Diaspora Institute, says Somali-Americans feel a backlash from media reports about a possible connection with the Kenya mall attack. John Ewing/Staff Photographer

Although radical groups have used social media to get their message out, most major media outlets immediately questioned the story’s legitimacy and did not name the alleged U.S. terrorists.

Critics, however, said the rush to report on the questionable tweets was still harmful to Somali-American communities.

“It was very irresponsible the way it played,” said Mohammed Dini, executive director of the African Diaspora Institute and a former candidate for the Maine Legislature. “It played for five days everywhere, from CNN to the local paper.”

Dini said he is not aware of any acts of violence perpetrated against members of Maine’s Somali-American community since the story broke, but there has been an unmistakable backlash.

Somali-Americans have been berated on the street, blasted on TV and the Internet, and subjected to public insinuations by politicians, he said.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has said there is no clear evidence of a connection between any Americans and the attack on Nairobi’s upscale Westgate Mall by Somali terrorist group al-Shabab, which killed at least 67 people and wounded more than 200.

Even though the likelihood grows that the Twitter allegations are false, Dini said, that doesn’t mean the negative treatment of local Somalis will cease.

“You already have three strikes against you because you’re black, you’re an immigrant and you’re Muslim,” he said.

Dini said young people are particularly sensitive to negative public attention because they have become deeply assimilated into the non-Somali culture in Maine.

“Those who grow up here or were born here are those directly affected,” he said.

Twitter shut down an account linked to al-Shabab shortly after it claimed responsibility for the attack. The group created another account, which has also been suspended.

Twitter’s policy states that content can be censored if it is used “for any unlawful purposes or in furtherance of illegal activities,” or if users “publish or post direct, specific threats of violence against others.”

But Twitter staff does not monitor content unless the posts are unlawful or threatening. Those are suspended only after reports of violations.

By the time the accounts linked to al-Shabab were shut down, the information had spread, even given their questionable authenticity.

The fallout hurts peace-loving Somali-Americans who are often treated as being guilty by association, said Abdullahi Ahmed, a Somali-American science teacher at Deering High School.

“Anything that singles them out, it actually damages their morale,” Ahmed said. “We are concerned that people are talking about Somalis and stereotyping.”

Dini also was critical of the way politicians, including U.S. Sen. Angus King, an independent, responded in the immediate aftermath of the news.

Dini said politicians’ vows to go after any wrongdoers from the U.S. read as though they assumed some Somali-Americans had participated in the attack.

King’s communications director, Crystal Canney, issued a written statement Friday saying the senator did not make any assumptions about a possible Maine link to the attack.

“Our statement was intended to let the public know that the Senator was aware of the situation, that if there was a connection that it would be pursued, and to remind people to avoid assigning blame to members of the Somali refugee community,” she wrote.

COINCIDING EVENTS

Two events coincided on Sept. 22 that appeared to lend credence to the idea of a Maine connection to the Westgate Mall attack.

The morning after the Sept. 21 attack commenced, the media reported that the FBI was investigating whether al-Shabab was trying to recruit Somalis in Portland, citing an incident dating back to 2007 in the Minneapolis-St, Paul area, where at least 40 Somali-Americans were known to have been recruited by the terrorist group.

There are more than 80,000 immigrants from Somalia in the Minneapolis area and roughly 6,000 in southern Maine.

Also on Sept. 21, a handful of European blogs posted versions of a list of alleged participants in the attack. Each of the published lists contained nine to 17 names and places of origin, including three to six people described as being from the U.S.

Included in some of the longer lists was a person described as being “from Maine, US.”

Within hours, media outlets, including the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram, began reporting on the alleged Maine connection to the attack, citing both analyst statements and the publication of a list of alleged participants. The Press Herald did not publish the names because they could not be independently verified.

Efforts to verify the identity of the Maine name turned up no evidence that the person existed.

Most news articles were skeptical about the list, which reportedly came from a now-suspended al-Shabab Twitter account. Still, the possible connection to Maine and other U.S. states, including Minnesota, Illinois and Arizona, became a major national news story.

Journalism ethics professor Robert Dreschel said the mainstream media’s decision not to repeat the names on the list was wise, although it may not have prevented harm to Somali communities.

“It goes beyond that into casting an aspersion on an entire community,” said Dreschel, director of the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The ability of digital social media to spread information quickly and the pressure on news outlets to get the story first can create a “lethal combination,” he said.

But, he said, the demand for immediacy in reporting, especially online, works against that ideal.

“Everybody else is going with it, so now what do you do?” Dreschel said.

TERRORISM AND TECHNOLOGY

If al-Shabab did tweet the list of alleged attackers, it was not the first time the terrorist group has used social media to control its message. Several Twitter accounts linked to al-Shabab have popped up in the past two years and been suspended for violating Twitter’s use policy.

In an essay published last November in the Yale Review of International Studies, graduate researcher Lindsay Pearlman said technology has “changed the fabric of the Islamic world, a community torn between rejecting innovation and embracing modernity.”

Her essay, titled “Tweeting to Win: Al-Shabaab’s Strategic Use of Microblogging,” says that platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have become tools for radical groups to “reach a greater audience, challenge opponents and spread their ideologies.”

“Twitter … offers unique advantages to users,” wrote Pearlman, a graduate student and researcher with the MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies. “Its short but sweet sound bite format and easy transmission abilities can captivate an audience accustomed to constant and condensed media bombardment.”

Pearlman examined the Twitter account of al-Shabab, which first appeared on Dec. 7, 2011, under the name HSM Press Office. She said the terrorist group has used Twitter in three areas: “Intramovement coordination, information creation and verification, and ideological engagement.”

Counterterrorism groups have also used social media as a way to research terrorist groups, using Twitter accounts and other social media to gauge the groups’ reach and track their supporters.

The National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland recently studied al-Shabab’s Twitter feed and discovered that its reach has grown considerably in the last year, in part because of social media.

“Twitter is powerful because it’s in real-time,” said James Sheehan, one of the authors of the study, in an email. “A supporter of al-Shabaab in the US or UK can follow events as they are happening, creating a sense of urgency and excitement among sympathizers. Supporters may feel that atrocities against Muslims are happening right now, the war is being waged and all the while the readers are merely sitting at home.

“They can also follow an attack for which al-Shabab claims to be responsible, as it is happening or shortly after. For supporters this can create a sense of moral shock coupled with a strong emotional impact.”

Sheehan said groups like al-Shabab have effectively used social media to promote their message as reliable, whether it is or not.

“One thing that al-Shabaab has been really effective at on Twitter is focusing their message on some key points, namely the promotion of their overarching narrative of the conflict, descriptive messaging about specific attacks focused mainly on their operational capacity, and promoting their group and media products as the only trusted source of information,” Sheehan said.

Sheehan also said that because Somalia’s technological infrastructure is stable and robust, groups such as al-Shabab can easily use photos and videos as part of its message.

“Access to these photos and raw footage which is then edited into propaganda videos and spread over the Web has easy pathways to the West,” he said.

To our readers: We have made a change to comments on this site. Please sign in or register on our new Disqus platform to participate. Questions? Email us.

Here at MaineToday Media we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion.

To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use. Click here to flag and report a comment that violates our terms of use.