Media outlets access enhanced multi-platform content at no charge, with alerts when we have new content on issues or from regions you may select. Once we receive the filled out form below, you'll receive a message with the passcode/s. Welcome!

*These fields are required

*Media Outlet name

*Media Outlet City/State

Contact name

Contact phone

*Email address or fax #

*Media Outlet type

Additional (beyond the state you are located in) content that you would like to receive

Newscasts

PNS Daily Newscast - March 21, 2019

The nation’s acting Defense Secretary is under investigation for promoting Boeing, his former employer. Also on the Thursday rundown: The Trump administration’s spending blueprint being called a “bully budget.” Plus, a call for the feds to protect consumers from abusive lenders.

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. - A new report from the Center for Biological Diversity highlights how President Obama, or any other sitting president, has legal authority to prevent 450 billion tons of climate pollution.

Michael Saul, a senior attorney with the Center, says that's how much carbon the president could keep from being extracted on publicly owned lands without waiting for Congress.

"This is a hugely powerful and immediately available tool to mitigate the potentially catastrophic effects of climate change," says Saul.

The report makes the case that any president could stop issuing new leases and prohibit energy development on public lands under powers already established in a series of federal land management acts.

Saul admits the notion of telling the energy sector to stop drilling may seem far-fetched in today's political climate. Several coal-producing states have joined a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency's far more conservative Clean Power Plan, claiming regulations would hurt the economy and lead to job loss.

Saul says the Clean Power Plan alone won't keep global temperatures from rising to potentially irreversible levels. The Center's study found the amount of carbon yet to be extracted from federally controlled public lands, if burned, would result in 13 times more climate pollution than was released across the entire planet in 2013.

"What's conservative here is actually taking real steps not simply to increase the efficiency of this system but to say, 'These fuels need to stay in the ground,'" says Saul.

The study points to scientific research showing that, in order to preserve a habitable climate, a vast majority of fossil-fuel reserves should not be burned. Saul says since good legal arguments already are in place, all that's needed now is a president willing to step up.