The Obvious Marxism of Obama.

The flat out Marxism of Obama is still not widely recognized by a sizable portion of the American voting public. I know some of you are tired of hearing it; nevertheless, here it is again: You show me a Marxist and I’ll show you an ends-justify-the-means liar. President Obama is, by his own repeatedly recorded words, a Marxist. As such, he is a
MEJTML14
, as he must be; it is inherent in his very nature.

He is already in personal control of most of the “means of
production” in major American industry, American finance and the
American market, and he has momentum on his side. He has fired
and hired CEOs of formerly private enterprises, and given marching
orders to formerly private major banks, financial institutions and
manufacturing industries, just as Hitler did back in the 30s. He owns
them; and he intends to own it all, as soon as possible, before anyone
has a chance to stop him. He has stated that he intends to fix
executive salaries of all of private enterprise, including enterprises
that have not received and do not want any bail-out money. He simply
intends to control them, too.

The lies continue, and grow. The oldest and most
repeated one, which still gets a lot of mileage and heavy usage, is how
he “inherited” all his problems from the former Bush administration. If
you remember the first giant, humongous “emergency” bail out under the
lame-duck President Bush, you saw candidates Obama and McCain, among
others, seated at the table with Bush, and unanimously agreeing to the
perceived need to proceed with that particular chunk of panic-stricken
shear economic stupidity. Obama may have been the only one at the table
who was not stupid, but who saw in the panic and the perceived crisis a
golden opportunity for the destruction of Capitalism and the
advancement of Socialism.

They all gritted their teeth and looked grim for the cameras, and signed off on it.

And the blaming of Bush began.

Since then, whatever bad economic news comes about, Obama can’t
really help it, because he inherited such a disaster from Bush. But
he’s doing the best he can, and his heart is in the right place. See?
He just needs more time. It’s all a lie. His real goal is the death of the free market, collectivization and redistribution, and supreme personal power.

I’ve lost track of how many times we’ve heard the
falsehood that some large American entity was “too big to fail” and that
only government could supply the “solution” to keep it alive. Every
one of the bail-outs and stimulus efforts failed, as was easily
predicted. Every one of the bill-justifying statements was another lie.
Remember when he told us that, for GM, bankruptcy was simply “not an
option”? Now that yet another huge bail-out has passed, bankruptcy is
the only option. It was just another flagrant categorical lie, wasn’t it.

And note well that it isn’t any bankruptcy court or
judge overseeing the reorganization(s); it is Obama, personally,
directing the reorganization of both Chrysler and GM. He said he had no
interest in directing the auto industry; then, practically in the same
sentence, he said “except for the most fundamental decisions,” which
means that he is making the most important decisions. In other words,
he is, in fact, managing the auto industry. My fear is that so many
Americans might not even recognize that lie because it was so smoothly
delivered.

He despises our Constitution, which he solemnly swore – falsely – to protect. His oath of office was a lie.

In a Jan18, 2001 radio interview, Obama began by saying that
past Civil Rights court cases brought both victories and failures.
Where it succeeded, he said,

“was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed
peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able
to sit at a lunch counter and order, and as long as I could pay for it,
I’d be OK.

“I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights
movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I
think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and
community organizing, and activities on the ground, that are able to put
together the actual coalitions of power throughout which you bring
about redistributive change. And in some ways, we still suffer from
that.”

So what he is about is Communist redistributive change rather than
protecting the American Constitution, which, of course, is not
Communist. In another radio interview on Sept 6, 2001, the moderator
asked Obama about his thoughts on the Declaration of Independence and
the Constitution.

Obama:

”I – I – I think it’s a remarkable document.”

Moderator:

Which one?

Obama:

“The original Constitution as well as the Civil War
Amendments,” he replied. “But I think it is an imperfect document, and I
think it is a document that reflects some deep flaws in American
culture, the Colonial culture nascent at that time.

“African-Americans were not -- first of all they
weren’t African-Americans -- the Africans at the time were not
considered as part of the polity that was of concern to the Framers. I
think that as Richard said it was a ‘nagging problem’ in the same way
that these days we might think of environmental issues, or some other
problem where you have to balance cost-benefits, as opposed to seeing it
as a moral problem involving persons of moral worth.

“And in that sense, I think we can say that the
Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that
carries on until this day, and that the Framers had that same blind
spot. I don’t think the two views are contradictory, to say that it was a
remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now,
and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country
that continues to this day.”

So, Obama sees a “fundamental flaw” in our Constitution and in our
country that continues to this day. His Marxist-dominated advanced
education left him with a handicap in knowing real American history.
Despite his statement to the contrary, it was exactly and precisely a
moral issue that drove debate in the nations formative years, and that
culminated in our Civil War. As previously discussed in the Racial Victimology
page, first, a passage condemning slavery was narrowly deleted from the
Declaration of Independence. Second, in the 1787 Constitutional
Convention, Article IV Section 2 had a “slavery clause” added to keep
the southern planters from walking out and thus destroying the very
concept of the United States of America. The nation might have died
right there.

He lied; it was the moral issue that drove the
debate. It was the continuing immorality of slavery that eventually
brought about the Civil War, and the Constitutional Amendments ending
slavery. The Civil War was started by white men, and fought against
other white men. Brother against brother. White men died, by the tens
of thousands, solely because of the immorality of holding black men in
unjust bondage. Either Slavery had to end, or, the Judeo-Christian Ethos of America had to end; one or the other. It was, precisely, a moral issue.

What other nation, in the entire history of the world,
ever fought such a bloody civil war for such an honorable reason? What
other nation ever sacrificed so much and bled so severely for a mere moral principle, and to free men who were not even citizens of the nation?

Question: What “fundamental flaw” continues to this day in our Constitution and in our country?

Answer: We are not Communist yet, and whites are not sufficiently punished yet.

Obama had another radio interview on Feb 27 2001 in which he
basically trashed the founding principles of America in favor of
Marxism.

Interviewer:

” … And the idea that you can somehow use the due process clause for
redistributing ends socially, and that it would be stable was I think an
astonishing assumption in the mind of litigators about what they could
accomplish over time. And it just didn’t last very long.”

Barack Obama:

“Right. And essentially it has never happened. I think if
you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and
its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to
vest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that I would
now have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch
counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.

”But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues
of redistribution of wealth, and more basic issues such as political and
economic justice in society. And to that extent, as radical as I think
people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It
didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the
founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been
interpreted. And the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that
generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties — says
what the states can’t do to you — says what the Federal government can’t
do to you — but it doesn’t say what the Federal government or State
government must do on your behalf.

“And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, the tragedies
of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement
became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of
the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that
are able to put together the actual coalitions of powers through which
you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from
that …

Right. Take it to the streets. To Hell with the rule of law.

Obama long ago bought into the great Communist Lie and made himself a part of it. His intent was Socialism all along.

But added to his Marxism is his barely concealed racism. We need to talk about that.

The Racism of Obama is not
widely recognized, because the meaning of the term has been purposely
skewed both in formal education and in the media to be an attribute that
may be attached solely to members of the white race. Which is false.
Whites have no copyright or patent on racism. Anyone can be a racist.
The common term “reverse racist,” as in most common usage, proves the
point. In simple English, the only way someone can be a reverse racist
is if someone is racist against his own race. (Which some whites –
mostly Democrats – are.)

Racism is generally defined as belief, and sometimes as a behavior, or as a behavior-guiding attribute.
First, racism is a belief in some inherent, possibly genetic racial
superiority / inferiority existing between different races. Second,
racism is sometimes taken to the point of believing that one race has
some inherent right to rule another race, or all other races. Third,
racism is sometimes taken to the point of irrational animus toward one
or more races, and programs or intent to do injury to members of the
despised race(s). The last absolute Marxist dictator of a truly
powerful nation, who was also a clear racist, was Adolph Hitler.

Popular government programs thought of as “Liberal” or “Progressive” but which are in fact Marxist, such as Affirmative Action and so-called Equal Opportunity programs, are in fact racist. Look again at the definition above. These programs, on the outside, as presented to the public by the Democrats, the
SLIMC1
and Celebritwittery, as uplifting and equalizing of so-called disenfranchised races. I submit that it is not possible to give any race or class legal preferential treatment without simultaneously giving another race or class legal detrimental treatment.

Purposely and legally treating someone in a detrimental way based
solely on race is, definitively, racist. You simply cannot get around
that fact. Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity programs are, by
their very nature, racist.

Here are some other facts that might be uncomfortable
for Lefties, but they remain facts nevertheless. Obama never in his
life suffered from any American racism. Most Confederate soldiers who
fought in the Civil War never owned a slave. Most American whites have
ancestry perfectly innocent of any American white racism. Possibly a
majority of American blacks today have ancestry who were never slaves in
America.

We all know the horrors that American blacks suffered
at the hands of white racists, before, during and after the Civil War.
That does not justify the racist animus felt in many black American
hearts today toward whites who had nothing to do with any of that. It’s
at the point where so-called black leadership publicly chastises black
criminals for perpetrating “black-on-black” crime, implying that
black-on-white crime might be more acceptable.

If anyone owes anyone else “reparations” for past injustices,
then by the same idiotic logic that blacks today call for reparations
from whites, whites could claim reparations from blacks for the loss of
lives, relatives, income and the huge, incalculable national tragedy of a
Civil War fought solely for their ancestor’s freedom from slavery and
the right to vote.

None of this should be any surprise to any of you who
have been following this site. I’ve been saying these things for some
time now. I will put links to some of my most recent past political
rants below this article to joggle your memory, or to enlighten new
readers.

We are cruising straight into a Socialist state, with Obama steering the ship.

Don’t let this happen. Pray for America.

==============================

(For lead-in history of how this particular American and now world economic crisis developed, see the links below.)

Hover-Link Footnotes:For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" over a link.)

Web-Page Comments, Dialogues, Latest Updates

As a former victim of the lie(s) you speak of above I
commend you for this work. It is terribly important for souls to
understand this danger. In part, this is the reason why the churches of
Europe are empty and generations of Catholics have lost the true faith
in this country.

I know from personal experience.

It was only after 40 years of my wondering through the
desert of sin, hatred of my country, God and His Church, that through
divine mercy I, and my family, became Catholic together...

The tragic reality, however, was when I called my
mother to tell her the happy news that we'd all be baptized, only to
learn that most members of her side of the family 'were already
Catholic'... Forty years...

I am well aware of the great loss of faith both within
and outside the Church, as I say, personally as well as from teaching
CCD.

As Notre Dame taught us, the education systems have
been permeated with such error and re-evangelization is crucial as far
as I'm concerned...

With your permission I would like to place this article
of yours on my blog (keeping all links to your site) and will promote
it as well... Also, I would like to link to your site from mine, again
with your permission.

Let us pray that it has not gone so far that it is too
late to turn it around. While we know that eventual victory is assured,
for even the very gates of Hell will not prevail against His Church,
still, it is not given for us to know the hour or the day.

”Answer: We are not Communist yet, and whites are not sufficiently punished yet.”

Punished for what?

Date: Mon Jun 08 06:01:47 2009
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Ryan:

For being white.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Sat Aug 22 09:28:34 2009
From: Jesse
Email: Location: Comment:

Victor:

Your arguments might be taken more seriously if you
didn’t go so far. Referring to the President as a racist, and comparing
him to Hitler, is really over the top. It takes away from your
credibility, and hurts the conservative cause.

Racism means belief in genetic superiority of one race
over others; if you cannot show that President Obama holds this belief
then you should not call him a racist.

It is true that Communist Russia, Nazi Germany and
Fascist Italy were all Socialist. However, there were vast differences
between them, and I wonder why you single out Hitler as the most similar
to President Obama.

I think you just need to calm down a little.

Jesse

Date: Sat Aug 22 12:02:49 2009
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Jesse:

I don’t buy that for a minute. There are lots of racists out there who don’t even know the meaning of the word genetic.

My Oxford desk dictionary and thesaurus defines racism thus:

1. Belief in the superiority of a particular race; prejudice based on this.
2. Antagonism toward other races.

I do not accept your narrow, pedantic definition of the word racism and
the application of the title racist. Just about everybody in America
knows what the word means and they don’t need any re-education on it.

Barack Hussien Obama, peace be upon him, has betrayed
in his spoken and written words an automatic animus toward the white
race. That makes him a racist, in my book, and that’s what I call him,
and anyone who doesn’t like it is just going to have to get over it.
I’ll let English majors quibble over the etymology and minute, nuanced
meaning of words. Sir Winston Churchill once, having been publicly
taken to task by some journalist over some minor grammatical error on
his part, replied that the editorial criticism was “the sort of pedantry
up with which I will not put.” I always thought that phrase was
brilliantly said.

As for the differences between Communism, Fascism and
Nazism, again, Nazi fits best. All of them, of course, being spawn of
Marxist thought, are different forms of Socialism, which is to say,
dictatorship. Communism is the international, or, global village variety. Nazi-Fascism is the nationalist variety.

So, what’s the difference between Fascism and Nazism? Economically and organizationally speaking, nothing whatsoever. They are identical. Both keep the captains of industry and the owners of the means of production on a tight leash.

The Nazi hatred of the Jews and others was a personal
character trait of a particular dictator, and really had nothing to do
with anything other than the raw power of a total dictator. Whether
Hitler’s racism was the product of a neurosis, psychosis, personal
idiosyncrasy, or whatever, is irrelevant. It may even have been that he
used the Jews as a straw-villain scapegoat for political reasons, or a
combination of reasons. It makes no difference; Hitler was a Socialist,
and he was a racist.

And that makes Hitler the most comparable of the three to Obama, who is a Socialist, and a racist.

I call them as I see them, and I see Obama as a racist,
and his current actions betray him as a Nazi. He already owns our
largest financial institutions, two of our three automobile
manufacturers, is beginning to dictate pay limits on all major private enterprise, and is about to take over the insurance and the medical industries.

What label would you put on that?

I call it National Socialism.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Tue Aug 25 23:18:53 2009
From: Jesse
Email: Location: Comment:

Vic:

You may feel you have reasons to be so negative toward
the President, but I still feel that a certain amount of respect is due
to the office itself. Disrespect for the office is shown all over your
site, when the holder of the office is not in your favor. The
terminology turns me off. You can say what needs to be said without
insulting the office. Examples: Your use of terms such as –

Jiminy Carter

the Presidents Clinton

Hillary and Billary

referring to President Clinton as a filthy pig

in your response to my last submission you referred to President Obama as Barack Hussein Obama, peace be upon him,

In an obvious and disingenuous attempt to link him to Islam. My concern
is that when you drag the office down in public, you drag the country
down with it. You have demonstrated a sufficient command of English to
be able to express your political views without stooping to this, so why
do it?

Jesse

Date: Wed Aug 26 06:26:01 2009
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Jesse:

Each of the personages in your submission dragged “the
office” down by grossly exceeding their Constitutional authority, and
they each revealed their unfitness for office long before assuming
office. Respect is earned, not owed. All of them opposed the guiding
ethos of America, first, and most importantly, and all of them promoted
evil, by law.

If Obama is not a Moslem, then what the hell is he? I
have yet to see any comprehensive faith statement by him, short of his
false public statement that America is the largest Moslem nation on
earth.

He has unconstitutionally fired and hired CEOs of
private enterprises. He has unconstitutionally broken private contracts
of which he was not even a party. He has unconstitutionally
expropriated stock from private investors without compensation and given
some of it to his union supporters. He has unconstitutionally
appointed “czars” with unlimited authority, and allowed them to make
unconstitutional demands upon private enterprise, completely outside the
constitutional authority and violating the constitutional constraints
of government.

Now, Carter and the Clintons were and are Marxists,
like Obama. But they were not as blatant about it. Obama is the first
clearly anti-American President in our history, who has set himself the
task of destroying America as we know it, and doing it quickly. Other
writers and commentators seem to be coming around to the fact that he is
a Marxist out to permanently command that part of free enterprise that
he can, and destroy the rest. I’ve been saying it from the beginning.

The only question is whether he is as bloody and
ruthless as was a Lenin or a Hitler. To do what he wants to do requires
absolute ruthlessness. If he is not ready to shed American blood on a
massive scale, then he will fail, because the American inner ethos is
beginning to wake up to him.

You have not directly stated one of the biggest Marist
influences on Obama: Saul Alinsky and his Industrial Areas Foundation
(IAF). This is doubly important for Catholics because Catholics have and
continue to fund IAF affiliates, inter alia, through the Catholic
Campaign for Human Development. See, e.g. http://www.johntwo24-25.net/index.html.

This Alinsky linkage is an important point, as recent
history clearly shows that Obama is a near perfect disciple of Saul
Alinski.

A lot of good Catholics have been and are being duped
by Marxist ideology that has crept into American (and perhaps European)
dioceses and archdioceses. Some of it is documented in this site in the
various Cafeteria Catholic pages. Some absolute evil has been officially taught in the name of Holy Mother Church. Catholics beware.

I'm glad that you did bring a lot to light about Obama, but being the
product of Native American and African American race I have seen a lot
of injustices against me and others and am very thankful for equal
opportunity and affirmative action that helped me provide for my family.
And lets move away from blacks want reparations we know its not going
to happen and we don't go through life dwelling on it.

Date: Thu Jan 14 20:18:46 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Serena:

I am not a fan of government programs aimed at so-called equal opportunity and affirmative action, as can be seen in my Arguments Pro and Con page, and more particularly in my Affirmative Action Racism page. The free market doesn’t give a whoop what color any of us are, and neither does any decent Christian or Jew.

”Reparations” for slave descendents or Indian
descendents would make about as much sense today as reparations paid to
modern Europeans by Indian descendents because of getting Europe hooked
on tobacco. Or maybe suing the descendents of Sir Walter Raleigh for
shipping Tobacco to the Old World for profit. It’s hard to say where
this might end; that’s the nature of silliness.

Take a good, hard look at the likes of Walter Williams
and Thomas Sowell, and meditate on how they made it so big, on their
own, without any Democrat sugar-daddy. Think of all the black American
self-made millionaires, more than in any other country on earth. The
notion that anyone cannot make it here without government help or an extra boost is an insidious, destructive lie.

Let’s recognize each other as equal before the law and
equal before God, and get on with life. We will all benefit,
economically and otherwise, from treating each other as cooperators
rather than antagonists.

It’s not your ancestry; it’s whatever animates you and
gives your life meaning, purpose and direction that is most important,
to you, to your family, to your neighbors and to your country.

The reason people are leaving the Church is because my Catholic
religion has decided one thing is important and only one. Abortion is
wrong so they sided with President Bush and the GOP and they forgot
about separation of church and state. They chose a man who started a
war so that unlike his father he swore he get re-elected somehow to
another term and he set up Iraq on the 2nd day of his presidency by
declaring to this staff he wanted a war with Sadam for any reason
because Sadam had tried to assassinate his father in Kuwait during
Clinton's years in office.

But the church did not look at the fact that Bush still
leads modern man at executing people in Texas in jail. That's ok? He
and GOP don't care about poor people only rich and that's ok with the
church because if their people had a lot of money they wouldn't give it
to the church at Mass, because the GOP mostly don't go to Catholic
Churches, they do others but not the Catholic church. NO, basically
poor people contribute to the church and they are the ones that the
Church needs to keep the thumb down on. Al Gore, Kerry and others had
to listen to the Bush's and have they paid for in blood. Illegal wars
and remember, Bush himself went AWOL and skipped a flight physical that
would have sent him to Vietnam but instead went Florida and worked on a
campaign for his fathers friend. Anyone else would have been
court-martialed. Ask Dan Rather, he lost his job when he tried to
report that to the American people and they blew him out of the water.
Good job by the Church again.

I have always attended Mass every weekend and the Holy Days still. See, it's my Church not theirs.

They make awful decisions but I do know that when I get
to heaven I don't plan on seeing many of the high priest of the church
there. Most are having their heaven hear on earth.

Do you want to fill the churches again. Give to God
what is Gods and give to the state what belongs to the state. They
choose a person or a party and they should then be taxed for their
support.

I believe from now on when the Catholic Church steps
into debate for a party or person even because of abortion or any other
reasons, let them stay clear or since they are in their own way
governing, let the land that the churches, rectories, convents and any
Catholic offices are held, they all should pay the taxes that
corporations pay. Then I think they would stop getting involved in
politics and get back to Jesus.

You lost Europe when you got between the people and the governments and your doing it also in America. Give me my church back.

And about Obama. You all racists. Give the man a
chance. In less than 3 months he was put down as the worst president
and the Bush years didn't matter. I don't believe this blog or any
others should be found on a Catholic place but I read the crap above and
it made me mad to realize that my Church is going the way of the dogs.
In 3 more years, vote him out you racists. And this from a full Irish
American who was born and raised in Boston and the Catholic Church. See
how long this blog stays. To the leaders of my church remember, Christ
placed St. Peter in the lowest part of the church as he did by washing
the feet of his apostles, now it's still the same, the Pope, Cardinals,
Bishop, Priest, Religious, are all in the lowest part of the Church,
down stairs in the basement and when done correctly the people are above
them being served. Many in the Church think the Pope is the top guy so
it's the Pope on top and it trickles down. If you feel this way my
religious people, I don't think Christ will recognize you when you get
to judgment day. Our previous Pope got that. When asked by President
Reagan if he could have his private phone number, he told him he didn't
have a phone. He only had a small altar, kneeler, bed, desk and chair
and usually slept on the floor because he felt that was the place for a
Pope knowing many of his people in the world didn't have a bed so why
should he. Now that is what a Saint sound like to me. Yes, he did go
along with Bush, but he was fed more lies than truths on that one. He
hated being on the sides of governments because he learned that most
governments in his life time didn't treat the people well. And what
about Fr. Drian. He was told stay in office or be a priest. No mincing
words on that idea but go ahead keep voting for the people in charge
for what ever reasons. If you want abortion out of America, first pray,
get your priests and people to pray and don't mention which nut case
running for office is in favor. If you do this, you will win the
support of good people but these days we see vitriol hate coming from
our clergy and it's just not correct. God Bless YOU, as I do. Remember
one last thing, any man who is priest today should remember the most
important thing about your life, you represent Jesus to us, What Would
Jesus Do? Did he ever mutter the words to anyone to help one person
over another. Even a poor woman of the night he told them he without
sin cast the next stone. Priests of my Catholic Church, put down your
rocks you are ruining my church. Europe, it might be too late, but
America, the clock is ticking.

The end to this bible, sorry.

Date: Thu Feb 11 05:12:42 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Bernie B:

Well well.

I’m afraid your mal-education is showing. You have been thoroughly duped by the purposeful disinformation efforts of a predominantly Marxist education system, the current Marxist-dominated Democrat Party and our Marxist dominated
SLIMC1
.

If you think the Holy Roman Catholic Church opposes one thing and one
thing only, then I’m afraid your proper catechesis in the faith you
claim is sadly lacking, and I wonder about the church you attend, or if
indeed your really attend at all. I am tempted to claim that there may
be nothing this President and his entire Party champions today
that the Catholic Church does not virulently oppose. If you support
such things as abortion, homosexuality, contraception, etc., then do not
sacrilegiously approach the Communion Rail, drop the phony charade and
stop pretending to be Catholic.

Regarding President Bush, perhaps you should read the Bush Lied, People Died entry to see the Marxist-Democrat source of the “lies” of Bush, as hammered and hammered by the thoroughly Marxist-dominated
SLIMC1
. Bush never went AWOL; that’s another typical
SLIMC1
lie. Real history is a very hard thing to kill.

Our American Constitution,
Amendment I, placed two restrictions on Congress and none on anyone
else regarding religion. The Catholic Church in America is just as free
as anyone else to speak out and to electioneer and to vote and to
support or oppose any candidate, issue, Party or platform as any other
American citizen or corporate entity. We refuted the invalid separation argument in our own Separation of Church and State argument.

Obama’s own written and spoken words clearly identify
him as a Marxist, following in the footsteps of past Marxist leaders
such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Ho, Pol Pot, etc., who
represent history’s bloodiest butchers, mass murderers, and most
ruthless dictators. If that is the sort of thing you love, then stop
pretending to love the Constitutional America that Marxism directly
opposes and seeks to destroy, and admit your own Anti-American commitment. If this article on Obama got your shorts in a knot, go read Deliverance from Evil; that ought to really light your fire.

Never heard of Fr. Drian; don’t know who that is.

I hate to break it to you, Bernie B., but the people
are already being motivated and animated by the anti-Christian,
anti-religion, anti-morality, anti-Constitutional, anti-citizen voice,
completely un-representative, totolitarian Marxism of this sitting
government. If in your eyes opposing a black Marxist makes us racist,
well, so be it. I suppose if Obama were white, we would be reverse
racists, i.e., racist against our own race. Except for those of us who
are black. Sorry, Bernie B., but it’s just not that simple.

You really need to wake up and smell the coffee. There
are just so many ways you are wrong here I don’t know how to address
them all. It is not your Church; it is His Church; He and
He alone makes the rules. You have nothing to say about it. As for
“When I get to Heaven … “ – I really hate to break it to you, Bernie,
but from what I’ve read of your output so far, when you get to your just
reward you won’t notice who’s around you, and they won’t notice you,
because you and they will be to busy and preoccupied with all the
constant personal screaming, pain and suffering.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Fri Mar 19 09:16:20 2010
From: Dee
Email: Location: Pa
Comment:

If Obama is not a rascist why did he attend a rascist church for
twenty year's? Why did he say a white man's greed brings a world in
need? He get's a free pass on everything. And what about these
czar's,like Greg Lyold white people need to step aside. I could go on
and on. Let's not forget Van Jones outrageous comment's about white
polluter's. And he's a self proclaimed communist. The world is really
upside down. Please wake up America we're headed for the slaughter!

I love this site - it makes you think and pay attention to what is
happening in our government. If you agree, please watch Glenn Beck on
Fox, Direct TV channel 360. He shows videos of actual events and
comments from individuals that confirm the opinion of this site.

Date: Sat Jul 24 10:41:36 2010
From: peter
Email: Location: Comment:

Why not update this essay, 14 mo later? Thanks

Date: Sat Jul 24 13:14:24 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Peter:

It was factual for the time it was written, and it
remains factual now. Marxism has not changed since 1848 when Marx wrote
the Communist Manifesto. Obama is a died-in-the-wool Marxist
revolutionary would-be dictator, and that sort does not ever change
their stripes.

It was a flaw on my part to not put dates on all the
things I wrote right from the beginning; some pages were written so long
ago I cannot remember the dates, so they just sort of hang out there,
undated. I wised up and started dating new publications only in fairly
recent history.

For more recent pages on the same subject done since this one, see the following links:

That’s all I can think of at the moment; there are
probably some more. Maybe I write too much on some topics, but this one
really lit my fire. At this point in time there is nothing that I pray
about, worry over and write about more than the current political
status of my beloved America.

I beg your pardon, and disagree. Opposition to evil
has a very strong place in the Catholic Church. I am not ashamed, and
am indeed quite proud of my open bigotry and open animosity against
Marxism and all other forms of evil.

You think Sarah Palin is good enough to be the president? She could
not prevent her own daughter from being knocked up by a hoodlum in high
school. So much good comes of opposition to condoms. Well, apples don't
fall far from the trees. Sarah was a renowned slut in school as well.
The baby Trig is probably not retarded. It is just that he got his
brains from the mother's side of the family. That does not matter
though. How much intelligence do you need to drill oil in Alaska?

How did you feel when you read what was written above? Downright
nasty? Vitriolic? Hate speech? You bet that it was. This is similar to
the treatment that has been dished out to the Clintons and Obama for
years now. Billary clinton??? Barack HUSSAIN Obama alias B. HUSSAIN
Obama alias B. HUSSAIN O.???? Some conservatives call him an ATHEIST
MUSLIM without stopping to consider the inherent contradiction in
itself. There is nothing wrong with having a conservative viewpoint on
social issues, but what is to be gained by the name-calling? Every man
has his own personal issues, but that does not mean that you dig it out
of the closet, mix it with a few choice distortions of your own, and
pass it off as truth. Clinton had a problem with women and Bush had a
problem with alcohol. I do not admire Clinton for his promiscuity the
same as I do not name call Bush for his alcoholism. You have issues, let
us talk issues. Name-calling gets us nowhere.

(PS: In the unlikely event that this submission ever sees the
light of day, I apologize wholeheartedly to the Palin family. I just had
to show Mr. Vic what slander and lies can do, for he likes to pass his
own version of slander as conservative critical thought.)

Date: Sat Feb 19 12:23:34 2011
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Liberal loony:

I give respect where it is due, and scorn where it is due. Both
are earned. Everything about Obama the great Community Organizer is
half-assed, including his guiding lights. There should not be any
surprise about a half-assed Marxist having a soft spot for Islam, or
about a half-assed Moslem having a soft spot for Marxism, or about any
Marxist joining forces with any Moslem to defeat a common enemy. The
important thing is that he is an anti-American who opposes free markets
and liberty, like you.

Bush had a problem and he dealt with it; Clinton had a problem
and he lied about it and continued in it. The difference in morality
and principles between the two is staggering, even recognizing Bush’s
imperfections. Clinton is a pig, pure and simple.

I’m sure you have the only family in the whole world that is
absolutely perfect, and that every single member your family is a highly
experienced condom user.

Be careful Vic. Your "You show me a Marxist and I will show an ends
justify-the-means liar" appears to me that the Pope and the Catholic
Church in stonewalling and covering up for pedophile priests makes the
Pope and the Catholic Church Marxists. On the subject of Catholics, how
is it that you profess to be a Catholic and yet you spew venom and hate
in your rant about Obama. I see, you are one of those "ends-justify
the means" persons!!

Date: Wed Jan 25 05:43:23 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

NAPOLIGUY:

The simple fact that Catholics and even Popes are human and can
sin does not make them Marxists. Catholicism is about Truth, and
Catholics try to follow and live in Truth in their imperfect human way.
We try, again, imperfectly, to live and guide our lives and our life
decisions by use of the Judeo-Christian Ethos.

However, the principle that says that The Ends Justify The Means is just pure evil. It is a smooth lie that leads men to Hell. Marxism is built upon that lie. I refer you to the Refuting Marx page for a brief history of this evil lie, invented by Machiavelli, polished by Hegel and mastered by Marx.

I refer you to the Political Ideologies
page for how American politicians have interwoven that lie into the
very fabric of American thinking, without most people even being aware
of it.

I identify the lie, and I identify the liars, when and where I find them. All Marxists are liars, because Marxism itself is a lie. I despise Satan and all of his servants, especially those who, like Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) follow the ethos of
BMDFP10
and Marxists.

Regards,

Vic

Sunday, February 03, 2013
Converted Page to SBI! Release 3.0 BB 2.0.

Date: Sun Sep 14 2014From: Vic BiorsethComment:

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic
Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option
June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .

Regards,

Vic

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our
standards of logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, back it up, keep it clean and keep it civil. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the New Liberals are what they are, and the internet is what it is.

If you fear repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

"We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

…There he goes again, trying to pick another fight with someone…

Pick a webpage, any webpage; pick a subject, any subject. Or start your own New Subject. Then draw your rhetorical sword and step out onto the field of honor. So, what are you waiting for? Stand up; come on out here.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input.

Welcome to my website.

Catholic American Thinker Free E-zine Subscription

Enter Your E-mail Address

Enter Your First Name (optional)

Then

Don't worry — your e-mail address is totally secure.
I promise to use it only to send you Catholic American Thinker.

The
Purpose of this grouping of links is to provide a repository for articles
exposing Comrade Obama, peace be upon him, as a deceitful and treacherous enemy
of Constitutional America.

Refuting Obama PagesIntroducing the anti-American, Marxist, racist, Comrade President Barack Hussein "Kiss-My-Ass-Because-I'm-Black" Obama, and presenting the Leftist, Democrat Party's latest manifestation of Racism. The new racism is a softer racism of low expectations, exemplified by the likes of Ed Asner, who will fault Obama with nothing whatsoever, and who will forgive and bless Obama for anything and everything he does to them, to others, to this country and to the world.

Old North Dayton
is looking forA Few Good Men
who are Catholic Priests, retired, about to retire or available for reasignment.CLICK HEREYou are a priest forever, of the Order of Melchizedek.

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.