We use cookies to improve the functionality and performance of this site. By continuing to use this site, you are providing us with your consent to our use of cookies on the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for details.

FCA's Bite in Balance As Justices Eye Implied Compliance

Law360December 4, 2015

In Depth

Mark Pearlstein, Laura McLane, Evan Panich and M. Miller Baker will represent a health services provider before the US Supreme Court in a case that will decide if companies billing the federal government can face False Claims Act liability for implicit misstatements about compliance with regulations. The result will have a major impact on the FCA liability theory known as implied certification.