One young Darfuri woman told Martin she had witnessed the rest of her family, including her 80 year-old grandmother, “sliced up like meat” by the Janjaweed (Arab militia). Other refugees had similarly horrific tales. And common among all the testimonies were four names – either whispered in terror or spat out in defiance. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, Vice President Ali Osman Taha, Arab Janjaweed militia leader Musa Hilal, and former Chief of National Intelligence and Security Services/presidential advisor Nafie Ali Nafie – these were the men they held responsible for the Darfur genocide, and for the regime’s atrocities far beyond Darfur.

Today, the Obama Administration has invited Dr. Nafie Ali Nafie and other high-level officials from Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) to Washington, DC. State Department spokeswoman Hilary Renner defended the visit as the opportunity for a “candid discussion on the conflicts and humanitarian crises within Sudan.” But in the Sudanese press, the NCP crowed that the invitation is a call “for the development of relationships between Sudan and the U.S.” Nafie assured his fellow hardliners that he was not going to the U.S. in order to discuss Sudan issues, saying that the regime knew what it was doing in that regard. Writing of the visit Rabbi David Kaufman, founder and co-chair of “Help Nuba,” said it was similar to inviting Heinrich Himmler to the U.S. to discuss the “humanitarian crisis” during the Holocaust.

Nafie eschewed training in plant genetics (he studied at UC Riverside, receiving a Ph.D. in 1980, thank you, USA!) for training in terrorism. According to the Sudan Tribune, Nafie travelled to Tehran in 1981 “on the apparent pretext of conducting further studies in the field of agriculture.” During the 1980’s, he also spent time in Afghanistan and the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon where he gained the expertise and contacts to develop Sudan’s own security apparatus, import weapons, and establish secret desert training camps. The Sudan Tribune says that it is also believe that during this time, Nafie coordinated with his former Iranian mentors “to supply arms to those opposing the American and French presence in Somalia.”

As Chief of National Intelligence and Security Services for Omar al-Bashir’s National Islamic Front regime, Nafie perfected the art of torture. Sudanese Onlinesays, “Dr. Nafie is by far the most brutal security official the Sudan has ever seen.” And the Sudan Tribuneexplains that he is notorious for the creation of Sudan’s “ghost houses” (buyut al-ashbah), unofficial detention and torture chambers run by Sudan’s security services.

Typical ghost house treatment was given to Nafie’s old colleague from the University of Khartoum, science professor and human rights activist, Farouk Mohammed Ibrahim. Ibrahim was arrested and taken blindfolded to a Khartoum ghost house where he was held for 12 days with no charges. According to his statement seeking redress from the Sudanese government, Ibrahim revealed he “was subjected to interrogations about courses taught and about colleagues.” During the interrogations, he “was repeatedly kicked, beaten and flogged, subjected to a prolonged bath in ice water, threatened with rape and death and deprived of sleep for up to three days.” Ibrahim told the Los Angeles Times that Nafie “was administering the whole thing. He did it all in such a cool manner, as if he were sipping a coffee.”

Recently, Nafie, who is also the deputy chairman of the ruling National Congress Party, addressed a graduation ceremony of the paramilitary Popular Defense Forces (PDF), the jihadists used by Khartoum to conduct the purge of black, African people in the Nuba Mountains. He said of those in Sudan who want equality for all Sudanese and a secular democracy, that they “are traitors for collaborating with rebels to overthrow the regime, and for preaching a secular system.” The opposition “has dug its own grave” by rejecting “the principles of Islamic Sharia law” and seeking to “establish a secular state like the Western countries,” he declared. He vowed to the graduating PDF members that 2013 will be a decisive year in which they would wage a war like that fought by Mohammed at the Battle of Badr, a battle that ushered in the beginning of Islamic expansion.

The Obama Administration is not happy about the backlash it is receiving because of the invitation to Nafie Ali Nafie. Perhaps is has forgotten how frequently Senator Barack Obama and his supporters criticized President George W. Bush’s Sudan policy. Bush’s policies merely saved hundreds of thousands threatened by starvation and disease, brought about the Nuba Mountains ceasefire, created a presidential-level Sudan Special Envoy, and helped to bring about a peace agreement leading to the establishment of the nation of South Sudan. But since he couldn’t bring perform the additional miracle of ending the genocide in Darfur, Obama accused the Bush Administration of not doing enough.

For example, speaking about Darfur in October 2004, Senator Obama said, “There must be real pressure placed on the Sudanese government. We know from past experience that it will take a great deal to get them to do the right thing.” Where is that pressure today, when an architect of genocide is invited to Washington, DC?

In a February 2006 speech on Darfur, Obama confided that “for more than a year now, I’ve been working with other Senators to see what we can do to really push the Administration to take this as seriously as it warrants.” (Emphasis added). He was disturbed that “the United States government seems to be backing off a little bit, the commitment that it made to deal with the problem.” Today, many Sudan activists are disturbed. Members of Congress, including U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), have written to the President, questioning his overarching Sudan policy.

Finally, in April 2008, with the Presidential election drawing closer, Obama again criticized Bush Sudan policy, saying, “I am deeply concerned by reports that the Bush Administration is negotiating a normalization of relations with the Government of Sudan.” He warned that “this reckless and cynical initiative would reward a regime in Khartoum that has a record of failing to live up to its commitments.”

Today, in justifying the invitation to Nafie, the Obama Administration challenges the idea that a trip to America for diplomatic discussion can be considered a “reward.” And it posits only three alternatives in U.S. Sudan policy: go to war with Sudan, engage in diplomacy, or be irrelevant. But there could be another alternative for U.S. Sudan policy. In his book, The Coming Revolution, Dr. Walid Phares advises the U.S. government to support the freedom and democracy-loving sections of civil society within totalitarian and Islamist regimes to foster democratic transformation. In the case of Sudan, the U.S. government could also quietly support the opposition forces that want regime change and a free, equal Sudan. In fact, Senator Barack Obama mentioned this possibility in his 2004 speech when he said that we should be “providing resources . . . including logistical support like airplanes, helicopters, trucks, and other resources that are needed to deliver humanitarian aid.”

But although the Obama Administration was willing to take strong actions to bring about the downfall of Egypt’s Mubarak and Libya’s Qaddafi, (and facilitate the takeover by Islamists) in this case, when the downfall of the regime could mean the downfall of the Islamist agenda in Sudan and the wider region, it prefers diplomatic engagement. Could that not be construed as a “reckless and cynical initiative”? Bringing Dr. Nafie Ali Nafie and other high-level officials of the Sudanese government to Washington, DC threatens to once again reward a regime that not only continues to have a record of failing to live up to its commitments and of committing brutal atrocities against its own citizens, but of pursuing an agenda of global jihad and Islamist supremacism.

Those people are so good at genocide that obummer wants to find out if they can help with his jews and demon white problem in the States

Smote

Interesting comment. Maybe Obama wants to learn how to persecute people from the experts.

faithiej

Dear Adina: Thank you for all of this helpful information. My friend the linguist (in the article) has also mentioned Bashir's uncle, but this is the first time I have seen some documentation on him and the role he plays. Also glad to see the paper by Lady Cox. She is a good friend of me and of the Sudanese people! G-D bless. Faith

I’ve been saying it for years, Mary Sue, it’s even the opening line of my blog:

“I’m fully convinced there is great need for a sarcasm font.”

pierce

This has all the ear marks of Obama trying to embrace Genocide as being acceptable.
Is this what Senior Citizens have got to look forward to under Obamacare?
Are the American people that stupid that they can't see what is going on? Our President is now embracing Foreign Governments who act to the contrary of our standards, and I do believe the Sudan is a muslim country. Is that alarm starting to go off? I hope so.

faithiej

Sudan is a country under the domination and suppression of Islamists. There are both Christians and Muslims in Sudan who resist (to the point of death) Islamization and Arabization. Unfortunately, our USG will not identify jihad or Islamist supremacism for the racism and terrorism that it is.

sharpsrifle

I have known numerous Nuer, Dinka and Nuba Sudanese refugees/immigrants in recent years. To a one, they detest Arabs and muslims…some even wishing they could inflict violence on muslims who live in the United States (one told me that if the United States wished to remain free, that every muslim here should be killed). The women all had horror stories of what had happened in Africa, and all knew they were viewed as being property at best by muslims…the men were aware they were targeted for murder by muslims. That Obama wants to deal with those murdering Arab swine speaks VOLUMES about his lack of character, as well as what he has in store for this country.

Mary Sue

these guys from Sudan know the horror that is Genuine Islam On Parade.

Guest

Likewise the original people of Egypt, the truly good and peaceful Coptic race. All but exterminated in their homeland, and still being pursued to the ends of the earth…

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com Porky's2istan

No one hates muslims more than anybody who has ever had to live near (or under) them. Armenians, Greeks, Chaldeans, Copts, Zoroastrians, Maronites, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, Serbian Orthodox, Catholics, Agnostics, and Atheists.

When islam is free to do what it does, it always shows it's true bloody nature.

Defcon 4

This is why islam and muslimes should be judged by how they act when they control the reigns of power — as in any islamic state on the face of the earth today.

Cassandra

Mr. Obama has no conscience. Nafir is a racist Muslim Arab above all and he hates blacks even if they are Muslims. He commits genocide because they are blacks. Is this what Obama will tell him. He is always playing the race card with us ,is he going to play the race card with them? Nafir has no respect for obama ;he is black. Obama should move to Darfur with his family and see his wife raped and the killed and his children butchered and finally himself be killed. That's what Nafir is all about . He is a Muslim Arab hating blacks criminal.

faithiej

I agree, Cassandra. It is a shame that with all the emphasis on racism from this Administration, they cannot see or acknowledge the most vile form of racism, that exists in Sudan. And the irony is, Nafie may think of himself as a Muslim Arab, but the Arabs of Saudi Arabia, etc. would still be racist against HIM and consider him black!

Mary Sue

if that's a pic of Nafir up above, the guy looks pretty black himself…self-hating black?

defcon 4

In FPM's coverage of the Somali high school riot in Minnesota it was intimated that the Somalis consider themselves more Arabic than black.

Carol

The way I see this is that obama condones the violence. So he really is a devout muslims.

Smote

Obama is a Muslim. Always was, always will be. If it walks like a head-hacker, talks like a head-hacker, then it is a… what? … a head-hacker. The suit is just veneer; a blindside. Put yer turban back on, Obama.

Sudan's National Congress Party behaves worse than South Africa's former National Party during the latter country's apartheid era. Sudan's NCP has committed genocide and crimes against humanity. The Islamist regime in Sudan is a destructive hate group that needs to be outlawed for good. Yet, the Islamist dictatorship gets to have trade with other countries, while democratic Israel gets threatened with boycotts and embargoes. It's a disgrace. The left does nothing about Sudan, because the left supports that country's regime. That is a real double standard.

defcon 4

Aren't they still practicing slavery in the Sudan?

faithiej

There are still many black African Sudanese from the South and Nuba Mountains who are in slavery in the north and in other countries of North Africa. As far as I know, the slave raids by Arab Muharaleen that used to take place in the 80's, 90's, and even early 00's, are not taking place as they once were. You can find out more about that from Christian Solidarity International – the great organization that has redeemed tens of thousands of Sudanese out of slavery. The root of the problem is the mentality of those Arab Sudanese who see the black Africans as "abid" the Arabic word that means both "slave" and "black" even when the people are not actually slaves.

onecornpone

Whatever the facts in any particular situation, we can depend on this regime to be exactly 180 degrees out of phase with common sense decisions that any educated American could make..

Perhaps it's a gift? (sarc)

The communist in our White House will have the entire world in flames, with mass murder and mayhem as a side dish, by 2016.