This mobile menu is quite working yet! Your editor’s doing his best. Check out the desktop site for links and our long-overdue site search function.

Every week, The Commons mails newspapers to libraries and schools throughout Windham County, and beyond. Of course we do! Part of our mission is make sure that honest, award winning reporting is available to all, regardless of ability to pay.

Now you can help further our mission. Only $75 guarantees a library or school delivery of The Commons for a full year. Join our Sponsor-a-Library program today! Click here (and select “Sponsor a Library” when asked “Apply My Donation To.”)

Let’s talk advertising

We’d love to help you with your ads! Please let us know a little bit about your advertising and your needs, and one of our team will be in touch promptly. You can also call Jen at 802-246-6397 Monday–Friday, 10 a.m.–3:30 p.m.

Regular ad features

Help Wanted

Real Estate

Nuts ’n’ Bolts (home improvement)

Public Notices (Legal Ads)

Front Page Box

Section Cover Strip Ads

CLOSE

More than a newspaper

The Commons is the public face of a larger nonprofit organization, Vermont Independent Media, Inc.

We came to life from the ground up in 2004, as members of the community became increasingly concerned about the consequences of absent corporate ownership of the daily newspaper in town and the need for local people to have access to the skills to create their own grassroots media.

VIM came to life lovingly and carefully thanks to indefatigable volunteers. The first public programs of the Media Mentoring Project began in 2005, and the first issue of The Commons was published in 2006. The newspaper was published monthly until 2010, when we began a weekly schedule. We are published on Wednesdays 51 times a year.

Our mission

Recognizing that a vigorous exchange of ideas and information allows democracy to function and is the lifeblood of a community, Vermont Independent Media:

• creates a forum for community participation,

• promotes local independent journalism,

• fosters civic engagement by building media skills

through publication of The Commons and commonsnews.org, and through the Media Mentoring Project.

Nonprofit IRS filings

By law, every 501(c)3 nonprofit organization must make its IRS filings available to the public. Here are ours.

Office hours

We attempt to keep our small newsroom open during the day on weekdays. But we are sometimes out covering the news, many of us are part-time, and we keep odd hours. We welcome your visit, but please make an appointment so you don't make a special trip.

Directions to the office

We're at 139 Main St., Brattleboro, Vermont (the Hooker-Dunham Building).

Search The Commons from 2010 to present

Newfane voters will reconsider the bond vote to fund a new town office building.

Town and Village

Building Committee prepares for re-vote of bond to fund new Town Office

By Wendy M. Levy/The Commons

NEWFANE—The Town Office Building Committee has been “working overtime,” to get residents ready for the Nov. 8 town office bond re-vote, according to Selectboard Vice-Chair Carol Hatcher.

Town Office Building Committee members Karen Astely, Doris Knechtel, Mel Martin, and Frank Suponski visited the Oct. 17 regular Selectboard meeting to give the Board an update on their work.

Martin designed a “simple and straightforward” brochure, using input from the other members, explaining their findings. They include costs for a new, 4,000-square-foot town office building using estimates provided by “a few” builders, committee members said.

The brochures also announce a series of informational meetings on Tuesdays and Thursdays leading up to the re-vote. Committee members said the brochures were mailed to residents in mid-October, and would be available from the town offices.

Board Chair Todd Lawley asked the committee members if the printing and postage costs were coming out of their budget.

“We’re doing this presentation for the Selectboard and the town,” Knechtel said. Suponski reminded the Board they have the re-vote coming up and they need to get the information out.

Board member Gary Delius reminded his colleagues that townspeople voted “yes” on Article 2 of the town offices bond vote; and Knechtel said the committee receives its direction from the Selectboard — thus, the cost of production and postage for the brochures shouldn’t come out of the committee’s budget.

“One of the biggest criticisms I heard of the previous vote was the citizens were not prepared adequately for the town vote, [and they] didn’t really have the information,” Hatcher said.

She praised the committee numerous times throughout the meeting for presenting “solid, current information that’s been gone through and investigated so the voters will be informed about the project and what it means."

“That’s pretty hard to do in a short span of time,” Hatcher said.

Knechtel said the information the Selectboard presented before the August vote wasn’t effective. “You get three pieces of paper, filled up, [and] nobody wants to read it,” she said. The new brochure will be “easy to understand,” Knechtel said.

Resident Ken Estey asked committee members why they present only one option: selling the town offices building and constructing a new one. The Selectboard had explored three options: doing that, renovating and adding to the current building, or continuing to address the building’s many problems piecemeal.

“We’re suggesting the new building ... without the ‘what-if, what-if, what-ifs’” of renovating, Martin said, because “it’s the most responsible way to keep taxes low."

“We’ve looked at the renovation again, and we’ve concluded it is not a reasonable option, fiscally speaking, for the town to pursue. That said, we’ll spend time [at the meetings] showing you why the new building is the right solution,” Martin said. The committee will mention renovations, Martin said, but “it’s a waste of time” going through all the details of renovations again.

Martin said he was speaking as a Newfane taxpayer when he said he doesn’t want his tax money wasted, either, and he believes constructing a new town office building, although it will raise taxes, will be the least expensive choice offering the greatest effect.

Suponski said he isn’t opposed to renovating the current building, and if the Nov. 8 re-vote fails, the committee will work on that option.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/pagestart.inc:142) in /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/helpers/comments/frontend/index.php on line 15