> From: Garrett Rooney [mailto:rooneg@electricjellyfish.net]
> Sent: 12 June 2002 18:59
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 05:53:06PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
>
>> I see, the problem is one of expectation.
>>
>> I expected 'svn rollback -r 5 bar' to undo all the changes between
>> revisions CURRENT and 5. What it does is to undo the change between
>> revisions 5 and 4.
>
> right now, we just revert the actual revision you give us.

Ah. I must admit that I also expected 'svn rollback -r 5 bar' to
mean what Philip thought.

And I wonder if it is a good idea to allow 'svn rollback' to
mean revert all changes between CURRENT and CURRENT - 1.

> i was also considering the possibility of interpreting 'svn rollback
> -r 10:15' to mean 'revert revisions 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15'. what
> do people think of that?