Comic Book Artist, Eisner Award winner for "Best Comics-Related Magazine", celebrates the lives and works of great cartoonists, writers and editors from all eras through in-depth interviews, feature articles, and unpublished art.

Neal Adams: The Marvel Years

The following excerpts are from an interview conducted in two
sessions during September and October 1998. For the full interview
- complete with plenty of rare and unpublished Adams art -
be sure to order COMIC BOOK ARTIST #3.

ARLEN SCHUMER: Why did you go to Marvel Comics?

NEAL ADAMS: I was inspired to come to Marvel to a great degree
by Jim Steranko. He dropped in to DC's offices months before and caught
me there—I was there nearly every day—and after we had a
good-humored yuck over my "Hey, it's a Jim Steranko effect"
panel in "Deadman," [Strange Adventures #216] he described
the Marvel style to me: Basically, they just let you free to do whatever
you wanted to do, and you just went ahead and did it. If you did it
wrong they'd correct you, but he hadn't been corrected along the way,
so he was pretty happy; Stan had given him carte blanche to do anything
he wanted to do storywise, within certain boundaries.

It seemed to me to be a wonderful way to do comics. Certainly, coming
from DC Comics, there was nothing at DC that even resembled what happened
at Marvel Comics. We wrote scripts, we wrote descriptions, we wrote
balloons, and the artist was expected to fit them into the pictures.

Part of what I did was say, "I like this Marvel style; it's
a little scary. I wonder what I would do with it if I had it available
to me?" I didn't know what I could do; when I came from comic
strips into comic books, I felt a tremendous amount of freedom—so
much so that I never turned back to illustration, which I was headed
for. I felt this freedom and I thought it was wonderful. The next
step in this freedom would be the Marvel style.

Arlen: Had you talked to Stan before this meeting? Did he
know of you because of the splash you were making at DC?Neal: When I went over to see Stan, I didn't go over to get
the X-Men; I didn't know what was going to happen and whether he would
pick me up. I had no idea.When I went in to meet him, he told me that
he was glad I came over and he wanted me to do something for Marvel.
One of the reasons was that "Deadman" was the only DC Comic
that the Marvel guys read. So he asked what title did I want to do.
I said, "Well, I'm sure there are titles I can't do." And
he said, "No, you can do any title you want."

Arlen: He would have given you any title? At the time, Kirby
was still there and, other than his titles, you had the pick of anything?Neal: Yeah, but I don't necessarily think he meant it, though
he certainly was generous in his approach. I said, "Tell me what
your worst selling title is." And he said, of course, X-Men.
Werner Roth had done the story just before me; they were giving it
to anybody who would wander in. They gave the job to Barry Smith (and
of his story, I would say the job he did on it was not his best);
they gave the job to Steranko, but it was dribbling down. Not that
I want to insult anybody but it didn't seem that anybody was giving
it much attention at the time. So I said I'd love to do it.

Arlen: Looking back on it now, if you had your druthers, what
would you have drawn?Neal: Whatever their lowest seller was. Stan asked me why I
would do that and I said, "If I do the X-Men, your worst selling
title, would you pay that much attention to it?" He said, "No,
you can do what you want." So I said that's probably a pretty
good reason for me to want to do it. He said, "I'll tell you
what: I'll make you a deal. You do X-Men for two issues—or however
many issues you're going to do—and after that you do a good selling
title like The Avengers." So I said, "Fine, I'll do that."
And that was the deal between Stan and I.

Stan then said, "How do you want to be known at Marvel? Do you
want us to give you a different name?" I said, "No, my name
will be just fine." So Stan said, "Well, you know, here
at Marvel we don't like people working for the other company."
I said, "Well, I guess you can't let me do the X-Men." But
Stan said, "No, no, no. That's fine. It's not a problem."
I said, "Good." And he said, "Hey, how about I give
you a nickname? How do you feel about 'Nefarious Neal?'" I said,
"Well, if you feel like doing that, I guess it's okay. I'm not
really prone to nicknames; I never had one, but if that's what you'd
like to do." So I agreed to do the X-Men.

Arlen: Your working at Marvel represents the whole breakdown
in that pseudonym game, where for instance, Gene Colan was Adam Austin.Neal: There were so many things that were wrong in comic books
that had nothing to do with conscious efforts to be bad—but it's
almost like going to another country where they haven't discovered
fire and they're eating raw meat. So you teach them to cook meat and
they don't necessarily like it at first but after a while they find
that their digestive systems work a little bit better with it.

It was sort of the same way in comic books; the things they were
doing wrong would have been so evident to somebody from advertising
or book publishing—any of these worlds outside of comic books—but
comics were so insulated, they didn't know they were wrong; they didn't
know that they were backward and foolish. So, for me, it was perhaps
an adventure in breaking these rules down but at the same time it
was my day-to-day existence. It wasn't like "I'm going on this
adventure to break down this rule"; it was more "I think
I should try to do this and see what happens and maybe I'll get something
else out of it."

My motives weren't so clear, but certainly that little piece stuck
in the back of my head when I went to ask Stan if I could do a book
for Marvel. I had seen those altered names of artists in the Marvel
books, and felt that passing back and forth from Marvel and DC would
be good for creators. And I didn't like the way creators were treated
in general.

Arlen: Didn't Gil Kane do it about a year-and-a-half before
you, in 1967 when he went to Marvel to do the "Hulk" for
Stan Lee?Neal: Oddly enough, it seemed when Gil Kane went to Marvel
and used the name "Gil Kane" that, for whatever reason,
there wasn't a significance to it; perhaps it became clear that Gil
was "changing companies"! Somehow when I went, it seemed
to make a statement.

I'm not saying that going back and forth to Marvel and giving my
name was my goal. It just seemed it was silly to hide it; I guess
because of whatever position I held in the comic book field, my going
and being so overt about it, and being so comfortable and willing
to talk about it—which of course I did—had more of an impact.

Arlen: So you agree to do the X-Men for Stan; then what happened?Neal: I was hit with a surprise: The extra thing Stan threw
in was that Roy Thomas was the writer. I had no idea who Roy was;
I'd never heard of him. It came to me as a surprise. I asked Stan
if I could work Marvel style, and just go ahead and do the books and
Roy would dialogue them. Stan said that was fine with him, except
Roy was the writer and he might have something to say about that.

So Roy and I went to a coffee shop nearby, and I asked him about
it. He basically said that he had worked only on that one previous
book, and I asked him where the story was going. He told me that Cyclops'
brother was kidnapped by this guy in an Egyptian costume, and they
were in a museum, and it might have something to do with blackmail;
Roy wasn't altogether sure what Werner was going to do with it and
what was going to happen; he didn't quite know where this was going
to go. So I said, "Why don't I just wing it and find someplace
for it to go; we'll take off from there."

Arlen: You mean you didn't know where you were going?Neal: No. I usually hit the ground running anyway, and if you
do a Marvel book, nobody hands you a plot. There was no written plot.
So what you do first is what you're secure in doing, setting the scene.

I had been to the Metropolitan Museum of Art and had seen an exhibit
on the Aswan High Dam that the Egyptians had moved from the Lower
Nile Valley floor to the upper tier of land, so this incredible sculpture
would not be destroyed. I had magazines, photographs and brochures
from that and I thought, "Jesus, this is an incredible place."
I said to myself, since this is a pharaoh, why don't I just go to
Egypt and start my story with the X-Men trying to rescue the brother
not in some museum, but in Egypt, at the Aswan High Dam?

The first thing I did was trace a photograph of the Dam to give me
a solid lock into reality and I worked off of that. I try to give
everything I work on a sense of authenticity so when you look at it,
you believe it.

Now what was I going to do? The next thing, to make a little time
for myself to start to think, let's have a fight! I'm at Marvel! Let's
have a fight! The Pharaoh threatens them, and suddenly these guys
in Egyptian costumes start a fight. By the time I get through this—
all of the X-Men are doing something with their powers, before anything
else happens. That gave me a couple of days; in that time I worked
out what was going to happen for the rest of the story, and I was
able to put it down and send it to Roy.

Arlen: You were literally making it up as you were going.Neal: What I did was take the pieces from the previous story
that didn't seem to go anywhere and just reformed them so they would
go somewhere. I remember even talking to Roy, saying, "Why is
this guy kidnapping Cyclops' brother?" And Roy said, "I
don't think we really worked that out." Y'know, if they had cancelled
that book after that issue, nobody would've ever known.

I had a second conversation with Roy and said, "Y'know, if Scott
Summers has mutant abilities there's a certain logic that says his
brother would have mutant abilities. Can I take that and weave that
into the story?" Roy said, "Sure, go ahead."

I thought, if I suck off the power from Alex and the Living Pharaoh
takes it, what does he do with it? What character do I make him into?
I don't think I got to that problem until later in the book.

Arlen: At what point while drawing X-Men #56 did you do the
cover?Neal: Near the end. I didn't know where I was going with this
character to be perfectly honest. I knew that I wanted him to be sucking
this power off. But I still had a page or two to go before I had to
figure that out. Near the end of the book I realized I could turn
him into the character on the cover.

Arlen: So you're working true Marvel style; you're telling
the story and Roy's dialoguing it?Neal: You must understand where Roy was at this point: Roy
knew the book was going to be cancelled. He really hadn't made a lot
of plans as to where he was going to go with the story. Nor did he
understand whatever my capabilities were or whether it would be an
interesting relationship or whether I would just be doing one or two
issues and that would be the end of it. It was our first date. So
I suspect he really didn't put a lot of energy into what was going
to happen. We were going to pull it out of the crapper or we weren't.

I'm one of those lucky people who got to work with my favorite writers.
At DC I got to work with Denny, and at Marvel I got to work with Roy,
arguably the two best writers in comics in those days.

Arlen: What about Stan Lee?Neal: I think Stan's personality was very melodramatic. Even
when Stan spoke, it was quite melodramatic. Every book that Stan did
was melodramatic. But there are times in comic books that you don't
want to be melodramatic. There are times you want to be scientific,
there are times you want to be conversational, times you want to be
clever, or cute, or whatever it is. For me, I appreciate more the
greater variety a writer can bring to the work, and that's what Roy
brought to the work.

Roy crafted the flow of words so that they blew apart every-thing
that had been done with group super-heroes right up to that day. There
was no end to the way he would handle dialogue; the way he would approach
the subject matter. When I had the Sentinels fly into the sun to destroy
themselves, he basically described the sun in very dry terms, and
said finally in the end that the arrival of the Sentinels would make
the smallest of ripples. It was very, very beautifully and cleverly
done. Stan would either say, "Well, there's no need for words
on this," [laughter] or "Excelsior," or come up with
a very passionate description.

Not that I want to criticize Stan, but I feel that Roy has a very
fan outlook; he knows all the little things that we all know. He remembers
all this crap that we all have stored away in our heads, and nothing
gets by him. Roy has it in him to find these things, to craft them.
Roy took his craft and gave another level to understand it on. Sometimes
the level was totally different than what was there, and then, almost
like a whiplash, came back and succeeded in enhancing the drawing,
which is very hard to do; but if you take your time and are skilled
enough, you can do it—and Roy did.

For me, Roy made me know that I could move forward with confidence,
that I could go just as crazy as I wanted with this comic book and
he'd be equal to the task. You have no idea how that buoys a partnership.

Because once Roy got to believe in me, we could sit and throw ideas
back and forth. They were not necessarily story ideas but Roy, again,
had this font of knowledge that he could throw at me. We would have
these conversations and they never would really be involved with the
story, but when I would walk away from them, I would feel that I had
enough information to put these pieces together.

I drew the stories, I handed them in to Roy, and he made sure that
I made notes on the sides of the pages. As he explained to me, "Unless
I know what's coming up at the end of the story, I don't know how
to write the stuff early on." So I would have to kind of add
notes to describe what was coming up, and where we were going. I would
call Roy about the rules and what he was concerned about and what
he wanted to have happen. But essentially I was doing something that
I considered to be a very personal experiment in how to tell a story
with this group of characters, hold them together and mold them through
the story.

Arlen: But the fact that you conceived and told these stories
on paper, that is the act of "writing" that is not given
enough credit. Because the Marvel Style developed the way it did,
artists like you, Steve Ditko, Kirby, were not given enough credit
for "writing."Neal: Based on what you're saying, I've spent a lot of time
writing. If anybody cares to look it up, they can find the stuff I've
written from The Spectre on down, and they can make their own judgment
and decide what they want. The thing to remember is whether or not
I wrote something or didn't, plotted or I didn't, I was smart enough
to get the best writers to work with me. [laughs] So I must have known
something. Most people who knew me knew what was going on at the time,
and most people who knew the Marvel style knew what was going on.

But essentially, it was never a question; we weren't sitting down,
splitting hairs about who was writing, who was drawing, who was telling
a story. You have to understand that we were collaborators and the
half that I didn't do, Roy did. And the half that he didn't do, I
did. And that's all I care about. It was an adventure, and we were
on the adventure together.

Arlen: In "Deadman" you were doing all that incredible
experimentation—some of which you were doing in The Brave and
the Bold—while the "Batman" stuff you did was more
mainstream six-panels-to-a-page; your X-Men picked up right where
your "Deadman" left off, with your experimental panel and
page layout.Neal: Relative to style, I treat each project that I do uniquely
for that project. When you have a Batman story, you really only have
to follow one character and enjoy the story. Here you have a series
of characters, and yet you have to enjoy the story as much—that
was primary. Very complex compared to a Batman, because there's all
these side conversations going on while Batman is very direct. So
any solutions that you use for Batman almost by definition don't work
for the X-Men; you can't do it the same way. You have to come up with
other solutions. In other words, when I did the X-Men, I decided how
I wanted to do the X-Men—it really had nothing to do with "Deadman"
or "Batman;" I felt the project deserved my unique representation
for that project.

In the case of the X-Men, I couldn't think of anybody who had handled
team books correctly. I know that at DC Comics, they had the Justice
League and they would take two characters off this way, two characters
off that way, and two characters another way, and they'd come together
at the end of the book.

Arlen: What were they doing in the Marvel team books?Neal: They seemed to go in lots of different directions. Except
for Jack Kirby, it didn't seem that anybody had a handle on how to
do group books; how to interweave the characters so you could get
through the book. The Avengers was an attempt to do a group book,
but again, my impression of it was that it would focus on a single
character. It was like the Justice League thing: They would focus
on one group of people and then focus on another group of people.
There didn't seem to be this interweaving that I feel is a good idea—to
keep them moving along the same path but interweaving together. Because
of that, when I got to do the X-Men, I really focused on interweaving
the characters. And to make it clear. You have to do things to make
something like that clear.

What I did was make the world of the X-Men more complicated; build
one thing on top of the other, integrate one thing into the other,
so that after a while, you get a whole world populated by these characters,
all integrated, so that you started to see a tapestry of characters,
all having these different interrelationships. I don't think the X-Men
ever should have been a story, and then a story, and then a story;
it should be this tapestry that goes on.

I think that if a contribution was made it was to tell people, yeah,
you can do a group book and not do it the way the Justice League was
done, and it could be just as satisfying as doing a single character
book. You just had to make that extra effort to do it and it would
work. I had never really seen it done before so that was intriguing
creatively.

Arlen: Critics say Jack Kirby created characters and you didn't.
But your act of recreating is original in and of itself—like
Green Arrow, like Batman, like Deadman. You didn't create Batman,
but your recreation of Batman is just as impactful as the original.
You recreated the X-Men in such a way as to give them new life.Neal: In a way, at DC, Batman was never my character. I kind
of turned him into my character, but he was never my character. At
Marvel, I felt to a certain extent that, especially with the X-Men,
that enough bad had been done to the X-Men, that in a way I could
recreate them and they would become my characters. So to a certain
extent, they did become my characters. Especially the new characters
became my characters.

Arlen: Like Havok, who had a revolutionary costume design.
He precedes those black figures in the "Batman" story ["The
Challenge of the Man-Bat", Detective Comics #400]. This delineation
had not been done in comics before— there's a realism to the
outfit yet it's also very surreal at the same time. What was your
thought process?Neal: It was like a mime who moves around—you look at
the silhouette of the body; you don't look at the interior of the
body. It seemed to me that that would be a great idea for a costume—the
idea of doing a silhouette like that and then doing the energy. So
if you speculate on the idea, you can say that the costume isn't really
a costume; it is a kind of energy container through which you can
actually see the energy inside of his body. So many guys draw Havok
with this thing on his chest and that's not the idea; you're supposed
to be able to see in the middle of his chest the energy no matter
where he turns.

Tom Palmer, in order to help me out and delineate the drawing, added
highlights to Havok's costume. I explained to him, "Tom, I've
drawn the character in such a way that you can tell what he's doing
in every silhouette—you don't have to worry about it; remove
the highlights." While there are positions you could put such
a character in so that you would need highlights, I made it my business
when I did Havok not to put the character in those positions. If you
limit yourself to certain positions, you would never have a problem;
the audience never loses track of it and they get it every time. That
was the philosophy behind it.

Havok was certainly not a Jack Kirby-type of character; he was something
new and different, and a little hipper.

Arlen: Let's talk about Tom Palmer's inking. Palmer had just
come off of a great run inking Gene Colan on Dr. Strange that was
beautiful.Neal: One of the things about Gene Colan that I have always
felt was that Gene never got a good inker; I guess I must have liked
what Tom was doing on Gene's pencils. I think Roy offered me Tom Palmer
and I must have talked to Tom on the phone. The other thing I liked
was it was very clear from looking at the work and also hearing from
him, that Tom was a Stan Drake fan and there was very much a Drake
influence in his work. I thought, "I'm not seeing enough Stan
Drake in comics these days, and if I had a Stan Drake kind of line
on top of my stuff, it would definitely give it a different look"—and
it did.

There are people who believe that Tom Palmer is my best inker. The
thing about Tom's work is it's tremendously sincere and thorough.
He never backed-off from anything that I gave him; he always went
for it and, if I was vague, he cleaned it up; if I gave him something
awfully hard to do, he did his best to finish it. He really, really
did the kind of professional job that I respect. For me it was a wonderful
job and I think he gave the whole series a classy look.

Arlen: Even though these took place in the late
'60s—you even have a character wearing a medallion and a turtleneck,
which might seem dated—because of the quality of the art and
the intense realism, it's not dated. The machinery, everything you
used in here, still looks very fresh. It doesn't have a dated look,
and I think that's just because of the quality of the realistic drawing.Neal: What I find that I enjoy about these books, is everything
that I did, to one degree or another, was an experiment. I liked that
experience. For example, here I was going to a company that was Jack
Kirby-inspired. You had to have roomfuls of machinery. So of course,
in my scientific-oriented world, roomfuls of machinery couldn't just
be random shapes—as lovely as random shapes are. They have to
make sense to me. I had to take what was done before, and make them
seem real to me. So here was a wonderful experience to be able to
do all that machinery that I wasn't obligated to do over at DC, and
somehow make it look realistic and satisfy me that it worked.

Arlen: One of the most fascinating of your "new"
characters was Sauron; what was the genesis of that character?Neal: When I was doing Sauron, I thought, what I want to do
really is a vampire, but a vampire that's not a vampire, that doesn't
suck blood, that's not based on a bat.

Arlen: Why were you interested in vampires to begin with?Neal: I think the idea of sucking something out of somebody
else, to make you powerful, is a very good theme. We did it on Havok
with the Pharaoh. But as a super-villain, to be tragically dependent
on somebody else is a very good theme for a story. I thought, "How
far away can I go from a vampire and still keep the same idea?"

So I went all the way back to pterosaurs, and used the idea of some
kind of energy that's based in some kind of disease, like a blood
disease, to cause this character to have to... not suck blood, which
the Comics Code wouldn't have approved at that time, [laughter] but
suck energy; mutant energy, to be satisfied.

Presumably, in the years after he left this cave, he absorbed energy,
not realizing what would happen to him if he absorbed a lot of energy.
In our book, of course, he absorbed that amount of energy which would
suddenly turn him into this pterosaur-type character, which is sort
of like Dracula absorbing a lot of energy and becoming a giant bat.
The similarities are very obvious, though nobody's ever brought it
up to me! Apparently I had gone far enough away for the analogy to
no longer apply.

Arlen: What made you bring in Ka-Zar to the strip? Were you
a fan of the character?Neal: The thing that set me off was the death of Magneto. They
had done what I consider to be some terrible things to the X-Men at
Marvel; you gotta read the issues that come before this, maybe two
year's worth. Magneto was essentially dead (he fell off a cliff or
something), not that anybody much cared.

I tried to imagine how Magneto, after falling off that cliff, could
somehow survive. Rather than being washed up on shore somewhere, it
seemed to me the way he survived was using his magnetic ability to
burrow his way into the earth, and drive the earth away from him while
he was falling, and slowing himself down. In the end, where would
that take him? It might take him into this Ka-Zar land; it's kind
of a nice segue, and it works.

Also, I had set up a cave with Sauron that led to some prehistoric
place, which either has to be explained as some incredible cave that's
lost in time, or an incredible cave that leads down to the Savage
Land. Well, since the Savage Land has been established, why not have
it lead down to there? It'd make it much more logical that this'd
be the case.

The elements started to come together, and I realized that's where
I wanted Magneto to be: Down there, and since he's down there, why
do I want to reveal that it's Magneto right away? Why don't I just
hide it? Who would ever suspect? Since he had never taken his helmet
off, no one knew what he looked like. When I finally revealed that
he was Magneto, Roy supported it with the line, "Maybe clothes
do make the man," which I think has become a classic line in
comics.

Arlen: So the story grew and Roy was inspired. How did this
whole thing just keep steamrolling along?Neal: It just kept on going, y'know? In the Marvel style, as
long as you do your homework and have respect for the work—you
have to have respect for the artists and writers that have gone before;
you can't just take it and throw it out the window and say, "Now
I'm gonna show everybody." With all that, to then take it and
put your stamp on it, and go and create a Havok and a Sauron and bring
back the Sentinels if you feel like it, and go into that world of
dinosaurs, it was mind-boggling to be able to do that, and I did one
a month for, like, ten months, and every single one took me further
and further out. It was a tremendous experience! The X-Men was taking
something that practically was ready to go into the garbage can and
saying, "Wait a second! Let's just go crazy with this!"

Arlen: You brought Professor X back from the dead in your
last issue—how did you accomplish that?Neal: Not only was Professor X dead, they took a year to kill
him. They made sure that Professor X was so dead that he would never
come back again. It's incredible! No character in comics, that I know
of, had been killed so unequivocally. Professor X got sick, got worse,
got really bad, and before he died, he lost his powers slowly over
a period of time, so Marvel Girl had to help him out. Then, after
a lingering loss of powers, he finally dies. He was unequivocally
dead! They buried him. How do you get out of this?

It was really a hard thing to figure out but I did. First I laid
in a clue: I brought the Sentinels back (I love the Sentinels; they
were one of Jack Kirby's greatest creations), unthinking, mindless
robots who could beat the sh*t out of anybody and just want to kill
mutants; they were such a solid concept. And how do you deal with
the Sentinels? The guy who created them was dead so I brought in his
son. I thought I have to lay in a clue, so when I bring Professor
X back nobody can ever go back and say, "Nah, you're cheating;
you just made this up."

So the clue I laid was all these Sentinels had captured all these
mutants that have appeared previously in the X-Men and put them in
these tubes. And then, when the good guys win and the Sentinels get
sent into the sun, all the mutants are let out of their tubes, except
for one. And if you look at that panel, all the mutants that appeared
in the X-Men up to that point are there except for one. That one is
The Changeling and the reason that he's not there is because he is
dead in the place of Professor X.

The story we did later (which I did with Denny O'Neil's dialogue)
was this: Professor X has found that there is an invasion that is
coming from outer space and he has to protect the Earth. Only he can
do it by moving the minds of everybody on Earth essentially. He can't
do that without training himself to do it. In order to train, he has
to disappear for a year.

While he is pondering his problem, the Changeling visits him and
says, "Look, Professor X: I know you think I'm a rat, but I just
found out from the doctor that I'm going to die, and I'd really like
to make up for all the sh*t I've done all of my life." Professor
X says, "That's really good but what can I do?" The Changeling
says, "Can you think of anything I can do to redeem myself?"

And suddenly Professor X says, "There is something you can do:
You can pose as me." But The Changeling doesn't have the professor's
powers and abilities. "But if Marvel Girl helps you," Prof
explains, "your powers and abilities will seem as though you're
me in decline and dying. I can go away and train to save the Earth.
She's going to be the only person who knows this, and terrible as
it is that you're going to die, you will participate in saving the
Earth." And that's how we brought Professor X back.

Arlen: Did you know X-Men #65 would be your last issue? Why
did Denny O'Neil script that issue?Neal: I was very unhappy with that, and I love Denny O'Neil's
stuff, but I did not consider Denny O'Neil to be the dialoguer of
the X-Men. I knew who the dialoguer was; it was Roy. He didn't dialogue
this. It was just handed over to Denny, and Denny did it. It was not
a happy situation for me. It was sufficiently unhappy for me to say
if Marvel wasn't going to cancel the book, maybe I'd have gone to
something else anyway.

I loved Denny O'Neil on Batman and GL/GA, but Roy and I had established
a professional relationship and I didn't find anybody else's work
to be as satisfactory. Also, Denny, as talented as he is, was thrown
into the middle of this, a story that I had essentially started months
before; suddenly, it's thrown into Denny's hands, and he has to come
up with dialogue. I didn't think that Denny was the greatest dialoguer
in the world for a Marvel book. I thought Roy was, but as far as structuring
a story is concerned, I thought Denny was a tremendous story structurer,
and he knows how a beginning and a middle and an end work. I don't
know that I could look at the qualities of Roy and Denny and pick
my favorite, because they're so different from one another.

One of the things Roy did almost better than anybody at Marvel is
give the right amount of copy to tell the story and not clutter up
the art. It doesn't matter how good the copy is if you're covering
too much important art, because then you're hurting the enjoyment
of the story. Imagine me coming from DC Comics, where I am designing
a page and the placement of the balloons, and at Marvel turning over
that job to somebody else and have that person have the same or similar
sensibilities—to be able to place the balloons in such a way
that they read in order, they tell the story, and they don't get in
the way of the art.

Arlen: Your last issue is also infamous for the blatantly
obvious changes to the monster on the cover and interior art; what
happened?Neal: I had decided, because not too much was going on in the
story, that I wanted to have some watchdog in this alien ship. So
I created a watchdog that would prowl through this ship, and handed
in my pages for dialogue and inking.

I came into Marvel one day, and Marie Severin—one of the nicest
people in the world, the salt of the earth, kind to everybody—came
running up to me and said something like, "It wasn't me, Neal.
Stan made me do it!" I said, "What are you talking about,
Marie?" I couldn't figure out what she was talking about until
I got up front, and she was all over herself with embarrassment about
the whole thing. I couldn't for the life of me understand until I
saw the inked pages.

Sure enough, patches had been put in over my spaceship watchdog,
who went around on all fours, and it had been turned into a man-like
creature walking around on his hands and knees, which seems a little
strange for a biped to have to do. But since the ceiling was there,
he couldn't stand up.

Arlen: Palmer inked it, and no records of the earlier pencils
exist?Neal: None that I know of. And the patches aren't even Palmer's
inking. It was one of those decisions that I think Stan made quickly.
I have a feeling communications broke down somehow. Maybe Stan made
some offhand comment that it shouldn't be a dog-like creature, it
should be something else; maybe that's all he said. However it happened,
I have no idea. It certainly isn't something anybody would consciously
want to do. That was such an atrocious change that I don't think I'll
ever forgive Stan for that one. I guess I probably should've found
the page and ripped that off and gone into Stan and said, "Stan,
this is ridiculous!" [laughter] But I didn't; I must've been
tired that day.

Arlen: Why were so many of your covers at Marvel retouched,
unlike your DC's?Neal: At Marvel, what would happen was, I'd get a layout or
I'd submit a layout which would get rejected, and then I'd get a layout
which I would have to pencil to. Then they would be dissatisfied with
the pencils, and they'd work on it. It would just become a mishmash.

Every time I tried to hand in something original, it was looked upon
as being different and weird, where at DC I was expected to come up
with original and fantastic covers.

Stan Lee was always suspicious that I did better covers for DC than
I did for Marvel; if he were to say it to my face, I'd have to say,
"Gee, Stan, maybe that's because you keep changing my covers."
If they left them alone, the covers would be fine. They felt they
had a point of view, but almost consistently with Marvel Comics, the
insides were better than the covers; where at DC Comics, the covers
were better than the insides. [laughs]

Arlen: Why do you think that was?Neal: At DC Comics, there must've been six or seven editors,
and they would discuss and have conversations with the production
room, and there was more discussion, and they would discuss the insides
as well as the covers.

At Marvel, all there was was one guy, Stan. He had to go and take
the stuff to his bosses, so basically he took the covers; I don't
think he ever took the insides. There was never a discussion about
the insides. Essentially, the books were just pushed through as quickly
as possible and printed.

Arlen: Was there any reaction at DC to the fact you were working
for Marvel?Neal: They tried to pile more work on me. DC had the good sense
not to fight something that was already done, but I was the first
to go in and say, "I just want you to know that I've picked up
some work at Marvel; it's not going to interfere with my work here."
I didn't turn down more work. I've never done anything in my life,
to the best of my knowledge, to hurt anybody or hurt a business relationship.

When you come right down to it, I wanted both DC and Marvel to do
well, and continue to feel that way.

Arlen: Why was X-Men cancelled?Neal: I can't even tell you why it was cancelled in the end.
To be perfectly honest, I knew that it didn't have the greatest sales
figures in the world, but certainly it was bringing a lot of attention
to Marvel.

One of the things I and others observed was that after the X-Men
was cancelled, almost every new artist and writer that came to Marvel
wanted to do the X-Men because of those ten issues. And as the book
was passed to each in his turn, they all do Sauron, they all do the
Sentinels, they all do Havok, they all go into the Savage Land, they
all do Magneto.

Arlen: After your run on the X-Men ended, you did a couple
of issues of Thor immediately following Kirby's departure from Marvel;
how did that come about?Neal: I don't know quite when it was. Stan asked me, "What
would you like to do next?" I said, "Y'know, Stan, I would
love to work on a Thor with you." He said, "Really?"
But I don't think Stan trusted me because he had seen my layouts on
X-Men. He said, "I don't really like those." And I said,
"Stan, don't worry. I'll do a Marvel layout. It'll be just fine.
In fact, I'll do a 'Marvel Comic Book.'" My intention with these
two Thors was to do 'Marvel Comic Books,' so Marvel that you couldn't
tell if John Buscema or John Romita did it. You'd flip through the
pages and go, "Yeah, it's a Marvel comic book."

So then Stan asks, "What do you think you want to do?"
I said, "Well, do you have a story?" Stan would go, "What
do you think you want to do?" (rather than say no). So I said,
"I'd like to change identities between Thor and Loki." He
said, "Oh, that's fine. Go ahead and do that." I said, "I'd
like to do that for two issues. Is that okay?" He said, "Yeah,
sure, sure. Go ahead and do it." So that was pretty much the
story conference.

Stan dialogued the first book and after about 20 pages he comes up
to me and says, "Y'know, I thought I was going to have a hard
time with your stuff, but it was as easy to work on as anything I've
ever worked on. I had a great time."

But Stan had a certain attitude about things. For example, I had
left a space for copy [pg. 17 of Thor #180, second panel] because
something had to be told there. So I left a space and wrote "Space
for copy." Stan got so upset with me that he called me and said,
"Why did you do that? Don't ever do that again! Don't leave space
for copy! You don't make decisions where the copy goes!" He got
all bent out of shape, but I thought it seemed to need some room for
copy that I didn't want to draw all over. "Well, I can take care
of that! Don't ever do that again." Awright, Stan! I had forced
him to write where I thought he needed to write, and he sure didn't
like that.

Arlen: Roy says you had a different style with him; he says
you'd leave blank spaces and leave a note, "Write pretty, Roy."Neal: [laughs] Yes. And he would! He never let me down. Maybe
that's where I got spoiled.

Arlen: So Thor #180 and 181 was as long as your collaboration
with Stan lasted?Neal: I got my chance to work with Stan and do a couple of
Marvel comic books. I was a happy puppy; I got to work with Stan,
ya know.

Arlen: After your stint on Thor, you followed in the departing
steps of Kirby again when you took over the 10-page "Inhumans"
strip running in Amazing Adventures with issue #5; how did that come
about?Neal: Roy was pretty much the person who would suck me into
whatever was going on; he gave me a call and said, "So what are
you going to do next?" Well, whaddaya got? "How would you
feel about doing the Inhumans for a while?" I had made an agreement
with Stan to do the Avengers, but I didn't mind doing "The Inhumans."
I liked the Inhumans and said, "Sure, why not?"

It seemed to me the Inhumans were right on, whereas the X-Men deserved
to be remade. I didn't think that the Inhumans deserved to be remade;
Jack had done them so well.

Arlen: Again, as in Thor, your realistic style clashed with
Kirby's—your Black Bolt lacked Kirby's majestic, godlike feeling—it's
a guy in a slick black outfit with black boots. While your style worked
for realistic characters, I don't know if it necessarily worked for
these godlike characters.Neal: I knew my style wasn't Jack Kirby's style but I felt
the group wasn't a Jack Kirby series as much as it was just a big
group of people—so I tried to do the best "Jack Kirby Inhumans"
in my style that I could. I tried to do a more realistic version of
the Inhumans, but they are so incredible, so fantastic, there's so
many of them, they all have super-powers; in a way it was too much
for a realistic artist. I think I would have to dedicate a chunk of
my life to do it right, and I wasn't going to do that.

I think I did a good job on "The Inhumans," a professional
job. In the end, I felt if I had full books to do, I could have paid
more attention to it. I thought maybe I could make a contribution,
to in effect reenter the Inhumans back into the Marvel Universe, where
they were missing from. People didn't really make much of these stories;
I liked them more than other people did. I added more of a melodramatic
spiel to it—it wasn't as big a story as Jack would do. I also
had been forced now to plant them in my psyche.

Arlen: Did you feel like you told the story you wanted to
tell with "The Inhumans"?Neal: I started to, but in a particular issue, Roy gave the
dialoguing over to Gerry Conway. I was already a little upset with
Roy at that time for not having dialogued the last issue of X-Men.
I really agreed only to do this if Roy was going to dialogue it. Suddenly
I had a writer who I didn't agree to work with. I didn't feel his
writing matched in tone my artwork; I don't think that our styles
matched. That's not even a criticism of Gerry; I just didn't like
the idea that another writer entered into this without my agreement.

It's odd; it shows you the difference between the companies. At DC
Comics, the script, whether I did it or someone else did it, becomes
established. You know who the writer is ahead of time, and generally
you know who the inker is. There's no opportunity for any kind of
change, because the script is done already. So you're pretty secure.
It was very odd for me at Marvel, to feel secure in that I knew who
my dialoguer was, and then it just got pulled out from under me.

Some people might think, after these two experiences with Denny O'Neil
[on X-Men] and Gerry Conway on "The Inhumans," that if I
was smart I would've seen the writing on the wall, and seen that this
perhaps was going to turn into a disaster. I guess I didn't see it;
I guess I thought these were anomalies and this wasn't going to continue.

But certain things happened to make me think that, for whatever reason,
however it worked out, I really wasn't going to end up completing
much of the projects I began at Marvel. I was going to start them,
but I wasn't going to get to finish them. That's sort of the way it
worked out. You can see that the forces were marshalling. Somehow
this wasn't turning out to be the wonderful experience I hoped it
would be at the beginning.

Arlen: Your first inker was Palmer. Did he get yanked off
the book?Neal: I don't know what he was doing. He was certainly busy.

Arlen: How did John Verpoorten come to ink you next?Neal: I was asked if I minded having John Verpoorten ink my
stuff. It's funny; there were people who said, "You really don't
want John Verpoorten." At one point, I thought, "Y'know,
I really want that Marvel kind of thing."

Arlen: What is the "Marvel kind of thing"?Neal: That big, thick line; very little sensitivity but lots
of brushstrokes.

Arlen: That sounds so contradictory to wanting a good artistic
product.Neal: For "The Inhumans," I felt I'd like to see
that heavy brushstyle. I felt this was good for this strip. I had
a very strong feeling about Marvel and, in some ways, John was the
heart of what was going on at Marvel at the time, and it really pleased
me to have him work on my stuff and do what he considered to be a
sincere job. I had personal conversations with John, in which he told
me how much he enjoyed inking my work. That pleased me.

Arlen: But what did you think of his inking?Neal: He tried to do a good job. I realized he wasn't Tom Palmer,
but Tom was Tom and John was John. There were other people who inked
better than John, like Frank Giacoia (who inked better than a lot
of guys), but Frank has a certain coldness; I wouldn't have used him
on something like the Inhumans because it was very melodramatic. It
wasn't tragic, so it needed to have a little bit of warmth. No matter
what you say about John Verpoorten's work, a certain warmth came through—I
can feel it. There was a caring and I liked that.

I felt very good about what was going on. I had been inked by a lot
of people, and I had my choices. When I did the GL/GA stories, I invited
different artists to ink the stuff, including Giacoia, Bernie Wrightson,
Dan Adkins, people with very different styles from one another, to
see how they would look on my stuff. Some would disappoint me, some
would surprise me. If I took a negative attitude about anybody I invited
to work on my stuff, I think it probably would've shown in my pencils.
I didn't ever want my pencils to be the thing people were criticizing,
so I penciled the same quality for each inker, in the hopes it would
bring something out of him that he hadn't experienced before.
What you look for in an inker is a good percentage; you don't look
for what you would call perfection. You look for a sufficient number
of areas where you agree, to make the work strong.

Arlen: After your four-issue "Inhumans" stint, you
finally went on to The Avengers. Because it came right on the heels
of you finishing "The Inhumans," was this a case of, "Okay,
I'm done with 'The Inhumans'; whaddaya got?" Or does it go back
to the deal you made with Stan that you would do The Avengers after
the X-Men?Neal: I don't know what happened, to be perfectly honest. I
don't remember the conversation, but I wouldn't be surprised if Roy
didn't come to me one day and say, "Remember what you told Stan;
you said you'd do it." So many elements were mixed into this
thing; my relationship with Roy was mixed in.

When Roy had Gerry Conway dialogue the second-to-last episode of
"The Inhumans," I did not perceive that as a good experience;
I was not happy with it. So I told Roy I would do The Avengers only
if he dialogued it; I didn't want anybody else working on them. My
deal at Marvel was I got to work with Roy; I was much more comfortable
with that.

Arlen: Was Thomas writing and planting the seeds for the Kree-Skrull
War before you came along?Neal: My memory—and I'm sure it's different from Roy's—says
Roy had wanted to do this "Kree-Skrull War," and in the
issues he'd done—I think it was two issues before mine—
the Kree and the Skrulls ended up going to war in some far-off galaxy,
but he didn't know for sure if I wanted to continue on that plotline,
or go on to something else. He asked me how I felt about it. I thought,
gee, a war, I'd love to do that. So once again, it was one of those
"Where do you want to start?" things; I said, "Let
me go and think about it."

Here we had these Kree and these Skrulls off in this intergalactic
battle, and here we were on Earth, and there were no Skrulls...
wait... no, there were these cows. Mr. Fantastic had somehow convinced
these Skrulls that they were cows. I thought, at some point they've
got to come out of this. They're cows! They're eating grass, y'know?
I think they'll probably come out of it just before they get to the
slaughterhouse, [laughter] where they stick that trip hammer to their
heads. It's got to occur to them they're smarter than cows, and maybe
they don't want to go in there. But given all that, I thought, "I
like those cows; that's a great image. We ought to use that. We ought
to have the cows do something." That was the basis of the way
I wanted to start reintroducing the subject. I indicated that I'd
like the first story title to be "Three Cows Shot Me Down."
Heh.

The concept of the War had to be left in the background, because
there was no rationale. We were talking about having a Kree-Skrull
War, but how this would affect the Earth, and what would be the significance,
sort of got left in the gray area later into the progress. I realized
at some point I wanted to bring Rick Jones into it for a very significant
reason, and I didn't quite know how, and I wanted to go into this
other dimension where Annihilus is, and somehow utilize that to create
the introduction of Earth into the War.

Arlen: Your first Avengers is memorable especially for the
opening sequence, in which Ant-Man travels microscopically within
the Vision's body; were you influenced by the comparable 1967 sci-fi
movie Fantastic Voyage?Neal: I saw it later actually, but I knew what it was about.
I had a lot of characters to deal with, and I thought, well, let's
start off small—we started off incredibly small, inside the Vision's
body—and grow out from there. What a nice thing to do, to go
all the way down, and start to move outward and outward into the universe.

I decided I was gonna kick ass on this thing. I was going to dedicate
myself to this Kree-Skrull War with these Marvel heroes, and just
really go crazy with it. My view of the War was very expansive—I
was headed toward a 10- to 30-issue miniseries of an intergalactic
war between the Kree and the Skrulls using the Earth as a battlefield.
I thought, this is gonna be one hell of a series. Inside my head,
I was going to do the best series I had ever done. I was determined
to do that; throw in new ideas and concepts, design work, all kinds
of stuff. This was going to be a big deal to me, a very big deal.
And it would include the Inhumans. I would make it, I thought, a validation
of... well... never mind.

The first issue was 34 pages, a big issue. Normal stories were about
22 pages in those days; that's another half a book. I must admit,
the idea of doing that many pages was daunting. But I was ready to
do it, prepared to do it, and doing it.

Arlen: Then how did the John Buscema chapter insert in your
second issue come about?Neal: It came as a surprise to me; I did not ask for it and
I did not feel that it was necessary. I thought, well, we're off to
a shaky situation here, but maybe if Roy's concerned about the amount
of pages I can get out, I'll just make sure the next one is in quicker,
so I did it.

I talked to Roy about the story as it progressed, and we were collaborating
more on the individual book storylines at that point, but only I knew
where it was going. I suggested to Roy the idea of doing the next
story from the point of view of a classroom in the future, telling
the story of how the Kree-Skrull War got to Earth. Roy kind of questioned
that; he thought it really sort of says that we survived. I thought
it really wasn't that important at that point; we know we're gonna
survive. I thought it would be an interesting way to do the story;
he didn't like it very much. I said I thought I could make it work;
he said okay, go ahead.

I went home thinking, "Let me think about this. Let me try out
some different ideas." After a few days I realized it really
wasn't going to work, so it probably wasn't such a great idea. Not
only that, Roy didn't like it that much. So I just went back to straight
narrative. I had some other work I had to get done at the time, and
it took me a good week to get back to it. When I got back to it, I
was fine. I had pages, I brought them in.

Well, apparently Roy had decided he was going to go with a different
way to tell the story, and he had sent the story to John Buscema!
It threw me for a loop. As much as I had been surprised by some of
his decisions in the past, this one just got me, and I thought, "This
is not good." I was just taken aback by the whole thing. There
was nowhere for me to go, so I basically bowed out. I knew it was
not going to be what I wanted it to be, go where I wanted it to go,
or be as big as I wanted it to be.

I really had the sense that I could do something bigger, something
really, really big with Marvel's key characters. If you look at the
four issues of the Avengers and see all the stuff that's in there,
you really get the sense of a tremendous framework building in a short
amount of time; it's an awful lot of work. Consider the work that
went into the layout of every page; look at the detail in these pages.
I turned out an awful lot of pages for this with a tremendous amount
of sincerity, and I felt it was going to turn into something. I was
building a kind of Marvel New Gods.

I felt I was embarked on an epic and I discovered the support for
doing an epic wasn't there, in general. The Marvel "machine"
was not prepared to get behind something as big as this, for whatever
reason. It just didn't feel to me that the team was operating as a
team; I didn't feel it was together. When something isn't working,
it starts to unwind. If you have a certain dedication to something,
it gets worn away and there's no use or reason to try to save it.

Arlen: Did you ever have the desire to finish the War your
way?Neal: Not really... Marvel folks have asked, but not in
a way that seemed workable. It would be very nice to finish it, but
I don't think I'll ever get to finish it—and I don't necessarily
think that anybody could finish it as well as I could (sort of how
I feel about "Deadman").

Arlen: How is it that you came to do "The War of the
Worlds" [Amazing Adventures #16] in 1973, a year after your Avengers
run was over? Were you a fan of the movie?Neal: I didn't even like it; it was just a good idea. There
was potentially a better story.

This character—later named Killraven—was travelling through
his world, collecting things. And he would trade things in order to
create and put together technology to fight the aliens. He carried
his backpack all of the time and everywhere he went, he would trade
off bits of technology for other bits until he could bring the world
together, by putting the pieces back together again, to fight the
aliens because civilization was being destroyed.

I was putting together a science-fiction concept. This guy, in effect,
was the son of Doc Savage—not the Doc Savage, but a Doc Savage-like
character—his genes are imprinted with the desire to put the
world back together again. It can only be done genetically; nobody
can naturally do that. That is the advantage of this character. This
guy is motivated by instincts he doesn't even understand; he's doing
these things, but he doesn't know why he's doing them—he's very
good at doing them because he's the son of Doc Savage and he's a wonderful
genetically-created person.

And he has a twin brother—only he's working for the aliens.
To me, that's a set-up for a really good series.

That concept got lost and, in place of it, was an adventure that
didn't actually have progression. My tendency is to move things from
point one to point two and on, and when that's not happening, then
people jump in and out. It was like what was happening with "Deadman";
they would have writers come in and do a story that would have nothing
to do with the last story or anything to do with the next story, so
there was no progression. Here, this story was started by Roy and
I, and midpoint into it, it was turned over to Gerry Conway again,
so I backed out of it. This sounds like a criticism of Gerry again,
but it's really not. It has to do with working with the people and
having a relationship, and trusting that it's going to go forward
and be positive, and it just seemed to crumble. I felt betrayed.

Arlen: Then you went on to do Conan, in issue #37, in 1974.Neal: I started a Conan and they told me it was going to be
a 32-page story—it was going to be a big book. I had decided
to ink it, especially because I knew it was going to be a large book.

I had done the first three pages and then was told that this was
going to be a 19-page book! I couldn't go back and redo those three
pages, but I had to grab the remaining story and [straining groan]
compress it to remaining 16 pages. It was in fact a 34-page book jammed
down into 19 pages. I refused in my own mind to limit the events of
the book to shorten the story.

For that reason, the book to a certain degree suffers because of
the smallness of the size. There are a lot of little drawings in there;
they're like Sunday pages—13 panels to a page! So if you read
that book, you almost have to mentally enlarge the pages to get the
impact of the story, and there are pages that have a tremendous amount
of lettering on them, simply because that much story had to be told.

A publisher in France loved the book so much, they gave me the opportunity
to re-layout the same pages, allowed me to make diagrams of new layouts,
and expanded the book to something near a 34-page book again, so you
got to see some of these panels reproduced bigger.

Arlen: What happened with Savage Sword of Conan #14, "Shadows
of Zamboula"? Though credited as "Art by Neal Adams and
the Tribe," the pages begin with what looks like your tight pencils
inked by you first, then the Tribe, but by the end, only your basic
layouts are detectable.Neal: After I had done the first Conan story, I told Roy I
need to be able to have the time to do this. We agreed it wasn't going
to be put on the schedule until I finished the whole job (for the
first time in my career). I laid out a book completely, so that I
would be satisfied with the whole project. These layouts were done
so tight that you could almost ink them.

How this unscheduled book got put on the schedule, and what happened
subsequently to that book, is something that I don't really know or
understand and consider a real tragedy in my professional life. Roy
suddenly sent copies of my layouts to the Philippines, where they
were finished up by Filipino artists who obviously didn't understand
them.

To make matters worse, I had been drawn voluntarily into a battle
to find some justice for Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster (the creators
of Superman), and it absorbed much of my time. While I was out of
the studio, someone from Marvel came to the studio and asked for the
pages and in a spirit of cooperation they were handed over. When I
returned to the studio, I was dumb-founded, but I was too involved
with "The Boys" to respond to this unfortunate event. The
rest is... as they say....

There are a certain number of pages here that I carried through exactly
the way I wanted to see them done. In the panels that I inked, you
can clearly see the sincerity of what I was doing. To have this thing
treated this way was just so very, very disheartening. To have layouts
taken away and done by other people is not something that should be
done to anybody, for any reason. I really wanted to finish this story;
I felt this would be my definitive Conan story. The thumbnails alone
show the potential of that story. You can see the devotion I gave
to these.

That was pretty much the last positive project I did for Marvel at
that time.

Arlen: Why was that?Neal: My association with Marvel Comics had always been good,
but in this time frame, with Conan, The Avengers, it was happening
again and again and again. There was never a point—even though
they were doing these things and making me crazy—where they would
approach me with something and I would say, "No, I won't do it.
I'm pissed off at you guys." I just couldn't find it in myself
to be mad at a company because things weren't going my way.

But when individual projects would go sour on me, it's tough to drop
them. It's tough to drop a project like the Kree-Skrull War; it's
tough to back away from Conan when I thought I was doing the best
Conan around; it's tough to leave "War of the Worlds"—jeez,
I was off to a run on that baby!

So my contribution to Marvel was done in spite of the fact the logs
were rotting under my feet.

Arlen: At about the same time your color comics work for Marvel
waned, the black-&-white magazine line was starting up, and you
painted most of their debut covers.Neal: For whatever reason, they felt I had the drawing power
to launch these magazines, and I never said no to them when they asked.
I painted covers for them and never backed away from them. Not only
did these paintings allow me to flex my muscles a little bit, but
they also represented no pressure. I was doing an awful lot of Deadly
Hands of Kung Fu covers, but as they went on, they got to be more
like drawings that were colored rather than paintings.

What's interesting is that Marvel had a sister company that hired
illustrators all the time, but they never seemed to go to these artists
to do these illustrations.

Arlen: The one interior black-&-white illustration job
you did do was a beauty, Dracula Lives #2.Neal: One of the reasons I was so happy with this Dracula story
was because I got Marv Wolfman, and I got to do this really nice black-&-white
Dracula. I think I got a full script for it and, if I didn't, I got
a full outline from Wolfman—it's his story.

Arlen: Did you want to do more Dracula stories—or more
black-&-white stories of any genre?Neal: Not really. The truth is, for me to a job like this and
to do it in wash, and to finish and ink it, was a loss. I don't know
what I was paid for these pages but it couldn't have been much. And
for me to sit down, lay it out, pencil it, have it lettered and brought
back to me, ink it, and then to lay washes on it, is an awful lot
of work. Normally, you'd give this to an inker and you take your check
and go away. This is a lot of work for one guy to do, so I really
did it for Marv and to do a Marvel Dracula story, and once done I'd
better get back to doing easier-to-do stories so I can make a living.

Arlen: It's as if you never said no to anything they asked
you, at DC and Marvel.Neal: I never did.

Arlen: Your work at Marvel, like your DC work, petered out
at the same time as you formed Continuity Associates and did more
advertising work; is that an accurate assessment?Neal: I don't even know how this evolutionary process took
place, but you have to remember that at both Marvel and DC, a tremendous
amount of my time was reluctantly spent making changes in the field.
I helped to change the code. I helped to satisfy and settle disputes
between the two publishers. There was a certain part of me that said,
"There's more to do," and another part that said, "I
think I can affect more change from the outside than the inside."
I just simply didn't accept work that I had no time to do.

Everybody was getting confident that the comic book business was
really good, and getting better. When enough people got in and DC
and Marvel welcomed new people, we opened Continuity on 49th Street.
Then people came up to Continuity, and that became the new meeting
place to get together and hang out.

It was time for me to back away and make my own way, and to be a
little less dependent on DC and Marvel. But there was never a moment
when I ever said to DC or Marvel, "I'm going to say no to you.
If you have a job and want me to do it (and I'm in a position to do
it and handle the deadlines), I will do it." But as time went
by, I could handle the deadlines less and less because I had more
work on the outside.

It was time for a change and I was moving on.

Arlen: If there's a legacy to the Marvel years, I would say
that, like Steranko's, yours was a small body of work that had tremendous
impact. Your X-Men and Avengers, in particular, seem to have had an
enormous influence on artists and writers years later. Your stories—and
of course, your artwork— have stood the test of time.Neal: Think of what Marvel is: Jack Kirby and the generation
that followed. I jumped into the X-Men and jumped into the Avengers;
the X-Men have had the longest and most powerful impact.

When Marvel Comics wanted to go into black-&-white magazines
with color covers, I started that off.

With Barry Smith, I was given a shot at doing Conan; I don't know
how much impact my Conan has had, but I did a really, really nice
Conan.

The other work I did for Marvel was more spotted: The Dracula story,
these other stories, but they all added a kind of sparkle to each
area. Whether it was covers or Crazy magazine, all those things served
to be a positive experience... or maybe it's just me.

On a personal level, I liked everybody at Marvel, I liked the people
who ran Marvel. I never had a difficult time with Marvel; my relationships
were always good. People were loving the work that was happening,
and were just as disappointed as I was when things didn't continue.

When the work was good, it was great, and the work changed the face
of Marvel to that extent—look at the X-Men. It was in the X-Men
that the impact was felt because it was a continuity that lasted a
good ten issues, and you can look at the run of it and say, this is
what the X-Men can become.

The Avengers was a small, bright star that dimmed and went away;
it's too bad. I can't have a conversation with Marvel fans without
the subject of finishing the Kree-Skrull War coming up. Why didn't
I finish it... or will I ever finish it? It rankles me, because
I know it would've been great, and I know they were disappointed,
and I feel like I let them down. If I had finished that War, there's
a suspicion that The Avengers could have been as strong and as powerful
as the X-Men. I know it could have and would have been.

I feel in some ways that my work with Marvel is sort of an unfinished
symphony that everybody would have enjoyed had we finished it.

To make subscription and back issue orders easier for our readers (especially
those overseas), we now accept VISA and MASTERCARD on our secure
web store! (Phone, fax,
mail and e-mail
accepted, too!)

Sign up here to receive periodic updates about what's going on in
the world of TwoMorrows Publishing.