I need a map that calls out all the locations of National Register of Historic Places listings in Albany. Start with File:Albany, New York Map.svg, remove all the roads so it looks like File:Albany, New York Map plain.png (might want to upload that separately so we have that map available in the future), and drop some sort of locating shape (a triangle? something similar to the google maps pin point thing? or maybe even an svg thumb tack?) to replace File:Albany, New York Map NRHP.png. Each one of those blue dots needs to be represented. A bigger pointer shape would be good because those dots are way too hard to see. Let me know if this is doable! Thanks! upstateNYer 14:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Trying give you some time to settle down, idk if you're still busy, but if you aren't, I'm hopping you'd have time to take a jab at this? Hope you're doing well :)Fry1989eh? 21:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

It is a great relief for me, that You were able to fix my svg-file File:Desargues on Parallels.svg. It would have been frightfully close to useless in my German article without visible names for the edges. If You have spare time, please mark my question (Village_pump#No_text_in_the_thumbnail_of_a_SVG.) on the "help-desk" as "done", however this works on this wiki. I'm using the commons only for illustrations for articles in the german wikipedia, so I am not really familiar with the technical procedures on commons. As I used a new upload-assistant I even lost my descriptions with this file, I uploaded.
Herzliche Grüße aus Deutschland! --KlioKlein (talk) 21:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I find it strange that the code is not the same in {{Indafotó review}}, {{LicenseReview}} and {{Panoramioreview}}. Well perhaps panoramioreview does not need to link to the site where the file is found but except from that it would be nice if they were more alike. At the moment it is not possible to mark the 2 first as failed or changed. And it would also be nice if it was possible to add a "|source=not found" or something like that. Do you think you could have a look at that? --MGA73 (talk) 10:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Can you please restore the image that you inappropriately removed from commons Commons:7527_near_snow_shed.jpg, and it's link to its former article on en wiki? Your removal of this image was completely inappropriate, as it was *clearly* marked as GFDL with explicit permission of the content creator, which I obtained myself. This is rogue behaviour. Regards, Fawcett5 (talk) 17:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Quote: "with permission of the photographer and released to GFDL courtesy of David R. Spencer". Since this shows that the file comes from a third party source, we need permission from David R. Spencer sent to OTRS as evidence for the release. --ZooFari 01:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Hope you're enjoying the holidays. Just thought I would mention there are a couple requests in the graphic lab if you're looking for something to play around with. The Puerto Rico one might interest you, since you made their governor's seal. Thanks as always for past assistance. Fry1989eh? 23:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Just mentioning this request again, as you made the first Governor's seal. If you have time of course, but it would be much appreciated. Fry1989eh? 22:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Would you be able to take the sign on the bottom-right of the image at right and make it into an SVG? It's the NO DURIANS sign. Let's call it a $1000 fine. Thanks! upstateNYer 05:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmm you want the file name to be '$1000 fine' or fill in the red square with it or both? --ZooFari 00:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Fill in the red space with the fine. Call the file whatever you'd like. Happy new year! upstateNYer 09:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I know that that file is heavily used... Most wikipedian believe that any file on commons is correct, but of course also here such hoax symbols are uploaded from time to. The situation is clear in that case; you do not need a dozen of discussions, as any single use of that file is not correct. Delinking is a job for the CommonsDelinker.--Antemister (talk) 08:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons is not responsible for making those decisions though. If they are in use, then that's their problem. If you strongly believe that the image is a hoax and is being used wrongly by the projects, then you should take the risk of delinking them. We can't do controversial things like that with CommonsDelinker. Once the file is delinked, you can renominate for deletion. --ZooFari 20:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Someone already noted it in the description that it is fake, and I did not find any reference to it in my sources. This is not "controversial thing", but simple housekeeping. Delinking one usage of the file is accepted, I did that several times with other files, but that's a boring work for a bot.--Antemister (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

You may find someone willing to do it if you'd like, so they'll be responsible for it. --ZooFari 21:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I wasn't sure how closely you were following your nomination of the heart diagram. One of the refs is a broken link. Any chance you could provide a working link to whatever that reference was? Thanks. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I've only had time to take quick glances but I have now updated the references and fixed gradients as suggested by Kaldari. I had no success finding the second source, but I believe it was a diagram in which I based the shape off of. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute sources remain and are more important and credible. --ZooFari 05:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

It seems to display fine in both Wikimedia RSVG and Adobe SVG plug-in, so if it displays incorrectly in another program, it's probably that program which has a problem. I gave the SVG code a light going-over, but am not sure that I fixed any specific problem... AnonMoos (talk) 02:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. The problem exists here (when clicking on the svg on Firefox). Not sure if you see or if the rendering error exists in other browsers. --ZooFari 02:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Looks like it is to blame Firefox. Safari has crappy rendering and presents a much worse rendering of the diagram. I'm not sure why the error exists on Firefox since it is only a simple shape, but at least it renders fine with Wikimedia RSVG. Thanks for taking a look. --ZooFari 03:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Looks like something interesting to work with. How precise do you want it to be with the original? I could easily remake a version of my own rather than vectorizing by directly tracing it (eg removing title, remove text-wrapping etc). Let me know what you think. --ZooFari 22:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Creative license is all you. If you think you can do better, go for it. upstateNYer 17:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Why is User:SreeBot blocked without even a notice? Actually, User:SreeBot is not a bot, but an alternate account that I use to transfer images from Commons. It is not automated, but semi-automated just like FTCG. Even if it were a Bot, shouldn't be the bot owner notified? --Sreejith K (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I apologize. I was told that you were notified but didn't think it was days ago. If you are supervising the script, please recognize the standards for transferring files. The author field is required in the description template even if you place it in the source [1]. Also, the licenses found in images like File:Gas-light-coke-lorries.jpg is very dubious and requires verification and translation to one of the existing PD templates available on Commons. The bot may be unblocked according to decision made at Commons:Bots/Requests/SreeBot. --ZooFari 06:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I have replied on the Bots/Requests/SreeBot page. Can you please discuss this over there and sort it out. I think blocking the bot is not fair from the reasons I have heard so far. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure which you visit more: English Wikipedia or Commons, but I just left a message for you on enWiki. I'll watch for your reply there. Best, – VisionHolder « talk » 04:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you please grant me my requested right at Requests for Rights? I've addressed what is so far the only concerned raised about me having this right, and have two supports. I shouldn't have to wait over 3 weeks for a decision to be made, it's clear that the usual granting admins are avoiding my request, because usually decisions are handed out within a few days, not nearly 4 weeks. Fry1989eh? 23:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I award you a Vectorizer's Barnstar for the excellence of your SVG graphics.

I added the {{Translation possible}} to all of your English-labeled SVGs currently used in non-English language wikis. I suggest you add {{Translation possible}} when you create any new SVGs that you think warrant translation.

Hi. This user upload copyrighted pictures of Danubio FC over and over, even when there was a DR. The user speak spanish and has a lot of messages of CRviolation. He claims to have rights over pictures, but no OTRS are given. In es:WP I can´t block it for CRuploads and this seems never finish. Please, can you do something and eventually delete or protect the pictures? Thanks. --Andrea (talk) 00:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The sides of hun river.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:The sides of hun river.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I use this script a lot, and sometimes files for flickr review contain both the flickr review template and [[Category:Flickr images needing human review]]. Could you please make the script remove this category (if present) when clicking on "license +"? Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, ive just uploaded an image form flickr titled Pitt Vs Baloch, i checked that the symbols and licences were the same on flickr as the symbols and licences on the commons upload wizard, so what am i doing wrong, i new to this and would appreciate so help/pointers on how to know what licences from flicker can be used as i thought that flickr licences had to match with the commons licences. thankyou.Bigboylol (talk) 11:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

I spotted a spelling mistake in File:White_House_FloorPlan2.svg, and don't really know my way around svg editing. If you get a chance to fix it, one of the rooms is labelled "COSMOTOLOGY ROOM" while the correct spelling would be "COSMETOLOGY ROOM". -- Nunh-huh (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Dear ZooFari. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

Hi ZooFari,
it is with a regret that I inform you that, following our de-adminship policy, you had your administrator rights on Wikimedia Commons removed today by a Wikimedia steward.

I would like to use this opportunity to thank you for your efforts and contributions in making Wikimedia Commons what it is today (no big words intended!). If you'll feel like doing so at some point, please feel free to re-apply for adminship at COM:RFA. Again, thanks for all the help you gave us, and (hopefully) see you back soon! odder (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi ZooFari, thanks for your great, persevering work. I hope, one day, I could support a you in your re-application for adminship. Best -- Rillke(q?) 23:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thanks for uploading File:Oenothera speciosa buds.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I received a message about the possible deletion of my picture on a page dedicated to me:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roel_Verschueren
Today the picture was still online.
I do not know and understand what the wiki message said. And I am unable to follow all the instructions that are proposed.
The only thing I can say is that the picture is my property and I own all the rights. So, what can I do to help in order to make everything as it should?

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hi. I am starting this script through my global.js, and I am having issues getting it to load every time on a page. I am having to thump ctrl-F5 to reload to get the tab links. Is there a means to get it to load early in the page load so the css takes effect earlier? Well that is what I think is the issue, that stuff isn't my strength. the console doesn't seem to show any issues (as best as I understand it). Thanks. — billinghurstsDrewth 14:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nepo Fitz01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!