Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

Correct!

Proper use of post noun 'clarifying constructs'.

Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

Not a valid choice.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of post noun 'clarifying constructs'.

Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

Correct!

Correct!

Proper use of post noun 'clarifying constructs'.

Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

Correct!

Proper use of post noun 'clarifying constructs'.

Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

Correct!

Correct!

Proper use of post noun 'clarifying constructs'.

Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

Not a valid choice.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

Not a valid choice.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

Not a valid choice.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

Not a valid choice.

Correct!

Proper use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.

2)- The agreement between the possessives and the possessed noun.

An important difference between the two languages is that in Spanish
the possessives agree (when the distinction is made) in gender and in
number with the possessed noun, whereas in English the agreement is
with the possessing noun.

4)- The use of post noun 'clarifying constructs'.

Because the first kind possessive adjectives for the third person
su or sus may stand
for his, her, your, their, to remove ambiguity Spanish allows the
use of clarifying de constructs after the noun. These can also be used
(for the third person) whith the article in place, not replaced by the
possessive.

6)- The use of 'pronominal possessives'.

When nouns can be dropped to avoid repetitions without loss of meaning,
pronominal possessives can replace them preserving the connotations of
possession. They are formally identical to either a
second kind construct or a clarifying construct with just the
noun dropped.