VATICAN CITY (CNS) — Pope Francis asked leaders of the [non-]American [so-called] Jewish Committee [of Zionist fanatics] to pray [to their genocidal god of talmudism] for his May trip to [Judeo-Khazar-occupied] Jerusalem, “so that this pilgrimage may bring forth the [illusion] of communion, hope and peace [in order to buy more time to push the Palestinians off their land so that the ‘Jewish’ kingdom can be built on it].”

The declaration [falsely] said Christians and [Khazar talmudists, atheists, communists, Zionists, et al who call themselves] Jews share a common heritage and a profound spiritual bond and denounced any form of contempt of the [Khazars who call themselves] Jews. It also explicitly taught that responsibility for Jesus’ death “cannot be charged against all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against the [Khazars who call themselves] Jews of today.’ [The religion of orthodox Judaism, in fact, without distinction, takes full responsibility for the execution of Jesus Christ, then and today, and many of its followers, then and today, take that teaching very much to heart, HERE and HERE].

Pope Francis told the [non-]American [so-called] Jewish Committee [of Zionist fanatics] that while the Catholic-Jewish exploration of theological themes must continue [if the Gospel is to be fully blotted out, as every Orthodox ‘Jew’ prays for], the two communities also must find ways to work together to construct [the ‘Jewish’ kingdom] especially [on the backs of] the poor, the marginalized and the suffering.

Stanley Bergman, president of the committee, thanked the pope for his commitment to improving [Judeo-Khazar]-Catholic relations and told him, “We come here feeling deeply that you are our true [lackey], and we [hope the goyim will follow you like a Judas goat to the kosher slaughter].”

The [fanatical Zionist Khazar] delegation also met with Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Commission for [Subversive] Relations With the [fanatical Zionist Khazars], and with Cardinal-designate Pietro Parolin, Vatican secretary of [corruption].

Rabbi [papal Knight] David Rosen, the committee’s international director of [subversive] relations, told reporters that the talks with the secretary of [corruption] focused on promoting [the Zionist agenda under the guise of promoting] religious freedom, education and cooperation in charitable activities. When asked, he said that neither the committee members nor the Vatican officials brought up the sainthood cause of Pope Pius XII, a [target] of [Judeo-Soviet contrived] controversy because of what he did or did not do during World War II to help save [Khazars, the sole criteria for sainthood in the ‘Noahide’ Novus Ordo church].

As for Pope Francis’ May trip to the [once] Holy Land, the [Counterfeit]-Israel-based Rabbi Rosen [who makes Jesus Christ’s teaching on pharisaism of no effect] said he wished plans called for the pope to be in [Counterfeit] Israel for more than 30 hours, but he was sure Pope Francis would “do everything that has to be done [to serve Counterfeit Israel’s antichrist agenda].”

“… no matter how short his visit is, it’s a guaranteed [boost to our failing brand],” the rabbi said. “Hopefully it will leave behind it a sense of greater hope for the future. That’s what we need in the Middle East [to buy us more time to complete the building of our ‘Jewish’ kingdom on stolen land].”

Addressing questions about the possibility of a Catholic-Jewish theological dialogue, Rabbi Rosen said [today’s] Christians cannot understand Christianity [due to the Judeo-bolshevik purge of traditional teaching material]. He said Cardinal Koch described that situation as being like “a child who does not know his mother [and is therefore very easily misguided into the jaws of wolves in rabbis’ clothing].”

Don’t be fooled by their modern costumes and duplicitious platitudes of ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom.’ They’re savages who intend to cover up the crimes of their forebears against your ancestors and send you and your children to the guilt chambers, the better to steal your land and resources and further enslave you with usury in the present and future.

For the second time in a week, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker publicly expressed her support for immigration reform.

“Put simply, this must be at the top of our to-do list,” Pritzker said Thursday at an event for the Los Angeles World Affairs Council that was attended by consuls general from Mexico, France and the United Arab Emirates as well as local city leader Jan Perry.

Pritzker, whose great-grandfather immigrated from Russia at the age of 10 [and was a key figure in the Chicago mob], told the Los Angeles Times that immigration reform is a “moral, as well as an economic issue” and one that holds “economic opportunity” for the country [Pritzker’s ‘morals’ derive from the genocidal Zohar which her family publishes]…

… Pritzker said … “Being multicultural is a great asset [and if you believe that, I have more subprime mortgage derivatives losses to dump on you].”

“The Holocaust has become the negative absolute in American society. In a world of relativism, we don’t know what’s bad, and we don’t know what’s good, but the one thing we can agree upon is that this is absolute evil, and it has become the standard by which we judge evil and, therefore, the standard by which we begin to establish values.”(Rabbi Michael Berenbaum)

The New School for Social Research in New York is an institution where future establishment policymakers and opinion shapers learn to form every decision from the basis of ‘preventing another Holocaust.’ So, it’s natural that the Hans Jonas professor of philosophy at the New School for Social Research would dredge up an old BBC Shoah for present consideration, Hans Jonas was a Lurianic Kabbalist, Zionist and pioneer ‘Holocaust’ fundamentalist dispensationalist operating under the guise of a secular philosophy professor.

A word about the commonality between Simon Critchley, Jacob Bronowski and Hans Jonas, all professors of what is called ‘philosophy of history.’ From their vantage point, which is clear from their writings, their ‘philosophy of history’ is something quite foreign to what most people believe history is or should be, that being the accurate recording of facts in relation to past events. No, their ‘philosophy of history’ is a more pragmatic, functionalist approach, the same as that of the rabbis of Judaism to whom history is an unfolding process of relationship between God, ‘Israel,’ and ideas, all in a constant evolutionary state of ‘becoming.’ In short, for such people, history is a story best serving of Counterfeit Israel first and foremost while everything else is a very distant second at best, yet still framed within and evaluated in reference to the story of Counterfeit Israel. This history can be, and often is, summed up in three words, “Esau hates Jacob.”

In Simon Critchley’s opinion piece, he leads us to learn at the feet of the master Jacob Bronowski as he teaches us “The Dangers of Certainty: A Lesson From Auschwitz.” Critchley informs us that the point of the entire 11th episode of the BBC ‘documentary,’ The Ascent of Man, is that certainty in science, dogma, politics, et al leads to ‘Auschwitz.’

Simon Critchley:

The relationship between humans and nature and humans and other humans can take place only within a certain play of tolerance. Insisting on certainty, by contrast, leads ineluctably to arrogance and dogma based on ignorance.

At this point, in the final minutes of the show [episode 11 of The Ascent of Man], the scene suddenly shifts to Auschwitz, where many members of Bronowski’s family were murdered. Then this happened. Please stay with it. This short video from the show lasts only four minutes or so.

It is, I am sure you agree, an extraordinary and moving moment. Bronowski dips his hand into the muddy water of a pond which contained the remains of his family members and the members of countless other families. All victims of the same hatred: the hatred of the other human being. By contrast, he says — just before the camera hauntingly cuts to slow motion — “We have to touch people.”

The play of tolerance opposes the principle of monstrous certainty that is endemic to fascism and, sadly, not just fascism but all the various faces of fundamentalism. When we think we have certainty, when we aspire to the knowledge of the gods, then Auschwitz can happen and can repeat itself. Arguably, it has repeated itself in the genocidal certainties of past decades.

This is the zeitgeist and has been for some time. Consider the pop religion/philosophy of the Star Wars franchise where the good guy/wise man Obi Wan Kenobi states, “only a Sith deals in absolutes.” This is in itself an absolutist statement. Nevertheless, according to Star Wars, the “Sith” are the bad guys; Dark Vader, et al. They deal in absolutes. And as as we’ve learned, absolutes lead to Auschwitz; an absolute truth of which you can be absolutely certain. In fact, you have no choice. To disagree earns you internment at the nearest guilt chamber, or prison; punishment enforced by the commissars of ‘tolerance.’

Now, one can surely appreciate the need for humility when flawed human beings approach such matters as truth, certainty and absolutes. But it seems to me that today’s preachers of ‘tolerance’ need to absorb this message most of all.

Let’s just cut to the chase. These sophists know that life is impossible without certainties and absolutes (without which there would be no basis to oppose ‘Auschwitz’); that it’s really a matter of who has the power to impose their absolutes. The establishment in all its power today mandates that Auschwitz is the ultimate, absolute evil of the universe and there is no tolerance for differing opinion. There is no tolerance for the good, honest people who, following the evidence and their conscience, sincerely question the absolutist doctrines of Holocaustianity and suffer loss of employment, ostracism, physical beating and state enforced fines and imprisonment because of it.

… “Chagall: Love, War, and Exile,” a startling and provocative show opening September 15 at the Jewish Museum in New York … As the exhibition’s curator, Susan Tumarkin Goodman, notes in the catalogue, the museum is aware that some constituents might find the subject transgressive …

The counterintuitive twist is that Chagall deployed the crucified Jesus as a tragic, urgent messenger whose purpose was to bear witness to the suffering of the Jews and bring it to the attention of the world …

Chagall, who was raised in a Hasidic home, had his own doubts about using Christian imagery, at various points consulting the Lubavitcher Rebbe and Israeli president Chaim Weizmann on the matter. But in the end, he kept painting Jesus …