Author
Topic: Becca Moore Two Year Contract Renewal - What Does It Mean? (Read 30752 times)

Shreve Legal Team

Buried in the April 20, 2017, Massillon Board of Education minutes is the following: Becca Moore received a two-year contract renewal through 7-31-2019.

Does this mean Nate Mooranto's renewal is already in the bag? His contract is up after this season.

Bluntly, with the graduation losses from the 2016 underachieving team, 2017 doesn't look like a great season by any stretch. So it never made sense to me why Mooranto didn't go after jobs after the 2016 season ended. If youse left town after 2016, you could have saved face. Your record would have been 12-8 (9)*, 1-1 vs. McKinley.

You have the stink of the OHSAA Munford debacle on your record. So Mooranto's legacy if he left after 2016 would have been a Chuck Shuff-like win/loss record, an OHSAA legacy as bad or worse than John Maronto, and other off the field debacles (Soft Serve Cupps, exhibit A).

Despite all that, someone would have hired Nate Mooranto after 2016. Someone would take a Massillon coach with a 12-9 record even with the OHSAA stink.

Why didn't he bolt town?

Becca Moore's two year contract extension perhaps tells us why.

The powers that be in Massillon; Da Klub, BOE, admin, Orangemen, etc., all OWN the hiring of Nate Mooranto. They are invested in this because THEY hired Mooranto and THEY set the agenda of this coach.

I suspect Nate Mooranto didn't look for other coaching positions after 2016 because a contract extension is coming irregardless of all of the previous off-the-field embarrassment or how potentially bad or good the 2017 season will be. He's getting two more years even if the Tigers go 1-9, 5-5, or 10-0 (that ain't happening). It's what I suspect.

I mean, why did his wife get two more years? They could have done a one year deal for Becca, right? Why two years?

El Spizo Chicone has at great length pointed out the situation with Becca Moore. He's revealed Mania, Linda Cooper, and more. Go through the forums... it is all there.

There are things that I just do not believe an educator should do. Participating in a movie with the image of Mania is one of those things.

If you're a cabbie or truck driver, you do not get a DUI.If you're a drug counselor, you don't deal weed.If you're a cook, you wash your hands.

If you're an educator, you don't act or associate yourself with a movie like Mania.

This doesn't seem to be an issue to the Powers That Be in Massillon. They own the hiring of Nate Mooranto.

Spinning a contract renewal is easy. Spin away:

"Mooranto needs more time as coach.""Nate has to rebuild from Jason Hall.""Our talent is down.""We don't have money to buy him out after Hall.""We need to show the world that we don't quickly run out coaches.""McKinley kept Thom for 16 years.""We need stability.""We're not a football factory (laughable)."

There's a 1,000 different ways to spin this.

The local rag, the Spindependent, didn't mention the two year extension of Becca Moore. They buried this item more than a pile of Larry Flynt magazines at the bottom of Mt. Rumpke Landfill.

I'm not in favor of this regime staying here. Go look through the archives of our forums and you'll see what El Spiza has revealed. The OHSAA debacle alone was enough for me. This is not about wins or losses like all of you think.

I think the OHSAA is a joke but anyone with a small amount of common sense should know Massillon is a target to the OHSAA. So why go through the ordeal to bring Munford here? He could have just gone to class and no one would have cared about that. This was all about football.

And after getting Munford eligible to play his 3 games, why didn't Nate Mooranto and his handlers of the Massillon Powers That Be fight the rest of the OHSAA charges?

It's all a joke. It's shameful. And I think it is getting another two years since Becca Moore did.

Fellow Tuff guys,let me start off by saying, I am a long time reader,first time poster. Great forum by the way...As a fellow diehard, this is as concerned as I have ever been with the direction of the program. We just ain't going to win with the Marshmallow man Mooranto at the helm. He has already been a debacle, the first year was what we thought it would be, but the second year was really head scratching. From the recruiting scandal,the porous D to the embarrassing exit from the playoffs. This interloper has already shown his hand,he's not here to build us back into a winner, he's just here to put head football coach of Massillon on the resume. If Mooranto couldn't get us to at least the Regional Finals last year with the talent we had across the LOS, what will happen this year? Cut the cord!

Fellow Tuff guys,let me start off by saying, I am a long time reader,first time poster. Great forum by the way...As a fellow diehard, this is as concerned as I have ever been with the direction of the program. We just ain't going to win with the Marshmallow man Mooranto at the helm. He has already been a debacle, the first year was what we thought it would be, but the second year was really head scratching. From the recruiting scandal,the porous D to the embarrassing exit from the playoffs. This interloper has already shown his hand,he's not here to build us back into a winner, he's just here to put head football coach of Massillon on the resume. If Mooranto couldn't get us to at least the Regional Finals last year with the talent we had across the LOS, what will happen this year? Cut the cord!

This addresses Moore and the Shit show he brought to town... however you could fire Moore tomorrow or 5 years from now and the same problem exists.

Basically Moore, Hall, and Stacy are the same. The only difference is who pulls their strings and both Hall and Moore were "out of nowhere" hires after we got refused by better applicants that we offended out of wanting to work here, better candidates we embarrassed our selves chasing that didn't want to be here.

To the point that more than once rumors were floated out, the press printed them, and we all got sucked in just to have the "candidate" make a statement that he never even considered it and was flatly not interested in the job.

------

More or less, you can fire Moore, you shouldn't have renewed his wife.... but who is going to replace him? As long as the Ringling brothers Barnum and Bailey worst interview crew on earth is doing the hiring... I have no confidence anything gets better, and a strong feeling it gets worse.

Fellow Tuff guys,let me start off by saying, I am a long time reader,first time poster. Great forum by the way...As a fellow diehard, this is as concerned as I have ever been with the direction of the program. We just ain't going to win with the Marshmallow man Mooranto at the helm. He has already been a debacle, the first year was what we thought it would be, but the second year was really head scratching. From the recruiting scandal,the porous D to the embarrassing exit from the playoffs. This interloper has already shown his hand,he's not here to build us back into a winner, he's just here to put head football coach of Massillon on the resume. If Mooranto couldn't get us to at least the Regional Finals last year with the talent we had across the LOS, what will happen this year? Cut the cord!

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but what does "having Massillon on your resume" do for a coach nowadays? Maybe it says, "this guy has had to put up with unrealistic expectations". If I'm hiring an assistant at a large college, or a head coach at a small college, having Massillon on your resume doesn't impress me.

You guys talk about "all this talent" we had last year....How do you think the '16 Tigers would have faired against the '91 Tigers? How about the '01 or '02 Tigers? Heck, even the '09 Tigers? Sorry but a bunch õ linemen who I witnessed get their asses kicked against a smaller group of kids with more heart isn't exactly what I call oodles of talent. Now I'm not necessarily impressed with Moore, not with his x's & o's, not with his off the field shit show, with with the baggage he brings, but there has to come a time when we all admit that just blindly blaming everything on the coach isn't working.

Logged

Shreve Legal Team

In the infamous text chain of The Cunning One, lee, and Lo Spazzie, I repeatedly warned those ham 'n eggers about Central Ohio football being better than those goofs realized. After all, Dublin Scioto has won a flipping state title and fields winning teams most every year.

Massillon isn't at the same level of prestige it was 30 or 40 years ago, no one can deny that. With that said it is still a recognizable name brand in the football world and I think having that on the resume garners a bit of recognition.

Where does the '16 team stack up against Massillon teams from the past? Well they're pretty far down the list... That '91 team was a team of destiny robbed. None of that really matters because that wasn't whom was on the schedule for the '16 team. "All the talent" in regards to the '16 team is not in terms of all time great Massillon teams, rather it was in terms of the teams that were scheduled or potential opponents in DII playoffs. Our team certainly had more talent than Perry this year, so what was the difference? Aside from the rest of the B.S. it comes down to the fundamentals of the game, blocking and tackling the football.

Perry played for and almost won a State Championship....what....In your visual, optic nature makes you say we were better than perry?

Looking at the rosters from both teams last year, you honestly believe Perry had more talent than Massillon? Perry has one kid that really stood out to me and that is the Carrick kid on the oline. Just because they played for the DII championship doesn't equate to them having a more talented roster.

Ok....Perry won 4 games just to get to the title game....We couldn't even get past round 1. You can...."look at all the rosters you want." Perry has some tough, hard nosed kids who won't allow themselves to get their asses kicked by smaller, less talented kids. And I freaking hate Perry....Just being honest with ya.

Looking at the rosters from both teams last year, you honestly believe Perry had more talent than Massillon? Perry has one kid that really stood out to me and that is the Carrick kid on the oline. Just because they played for the DII championship doesn't equate to them having a more talented roster.

Massillon isn't at the same level of prestige it was 30 or 40 years ago, no one can deny that. With that said it is still a recognizable name brand in the football world and I think having that on the resume garners a bit of recognition.

Where does the '16 team stack up against Massillon teams from the past? Well they're pretty far down the list... That '91 team was a team of destiny robbed. None of that really matters because that wasn't whom was on the schedule for the '16 team. "All the talent" in regards to the '16 team is not in terms of all time great Massillon teams, rather it was in terms of the teams that were scheduled or potential opponents in DII playoffs. Our team certainly had more talent than Perry this year, so what was the difference? Aside from the rest of the B.S. it comes down to the fundamentals of the game, blocking and tackling the football.

Massillon isn't at the same level of prestige it was 30 or 40 years ago, no one can deny that. With that said it is still a recognizable name brand in the football world and I think having that on the resume garners a bit of recognition.

Where does the '16 team stack up against Massillon teams from the past? Well they're pretty far down the list... That '91 team was a team of destiny robbed. None of that really matters because that wasn't whom was on the schedule for the '16 team. "All the talent" in regards to the '16 team is not in terms of all time great Massillon teams, rather it was in terms of the teams that were scheduled or potential opponents in DII playoffs. Our team certainly had more talent than Perry this year, so what was the difference? Aside from the rest of the B.S. it comes down to the fundamentals of the game, blocking and tackling the football.

Massillon isn't at the same level of prestige it was 30 or 40 years ago, no one can deny that. With that said it is still a recognizable name brand in the football world and I think having that on the resume garners a bit of recognition.

Where does the '16 team stack up against Massillon teams from the past? Well they're pretty far down the list... That '91 team was a team of destiny robbed. None of that really matters because that wasn't whom was on the schedule for the '16 team. "All the talent" in regards to the '16 team is not in terms of all time great Massillon teams, rather it was in terms of the teams that were scheduled or potential opponents in DII playoffs. Our team certainly had more talent than Perry this year, so what was the difference? Aside from the rest of the B.S. it comes down to the fundamentals of the game, blocking and tackling the football.

Let's remember that I'm a "Massillon guy" through and through..

That said....What "Garner's recognition" by having Massillon on the ole resume?

You want to say we're better than Perry and then talk about fundamentals? Perry IS fundamentals....