For last two days a lot of discussions have been going on. It's time to summarize our thoughts in a poll. Please find yourself free to express your thoughts.

Zeeshan

September 15, 2008, 06:28 PM

warwolf vai...eta ektu beshi rhetorical hoye jache na?

Dhakablues

September 15, 2008, 06:29 PM

Would it be better, if you had a poll instead?

Personally, I support it.. I am happy that I will get to see now two Bangladeshi teams competing, the national team and the Dhaka Warriors. I also hope that ICL will resolve the conflicts with BCI,, and then suddenly our players will not be villians but pioneering heroes. Ironic that a political issue has now made this really exciting news a traitor vs. professional fight.

WarWolf

September 15, 2008, 06:32 PM

I attached a poll. Probably did some thing wrong with it.

cricket_king

September 15, 2008, 06:33 PM

Would it be better, if you had a poll instead?

Personally, I support it.. I am happy that I will get to see now two Bangladeshi teams competing, the national team and the Dhaka Warriors. I also hope that ICL will resolve the conflicts with BCI,, and then suddenly our players will not be villians but pioneering heroes. Ironic that a political issue has now made this really exciting news a traitor vs. professional fight.

There is no way the board should let these players back into the National team even if the BCCI change their minds on the ICL. They've left us for their own selfish reasons (excluding Bashar), and I don't think any one will consider them "pioneering heroes".

I just don't see how some members are taking this so lightly....some even excited about a new team to support.

Trigger_Tiger

September 15, 2008, 06:34 PM

If they want to go, go. I feel a little betrayed as a fan personally. But when it comes to support, I don't want to be like them if they are dubbed sinister for choosing their career life over what people want, and hence I surely would be supportive and hope they do their best. But am not very impressed by what they did and that too so suddenly!

well i think it's kind of low to ditch your nation when it needs you but i understand why they made the move. i don't really support the move but i'm still going to follow them and hope they do well, tbh i would just like to see some bangladesh players doing well regardless of who they're playing for and for me it's going to be interesting to see whether the different environment and situation will create a change in the performance of these players.

someone brought it up in another thread, this could cause a better development in BD cricket, it could become much more professional due to what's happening atm, though if BD loses test status quickly then i reckon cricket in BD will be focused on less and thus we'll experience a bit of a downfall.

Given that they will represent Bangladesh in an international league, I will support the team. I can't believe I am saying that but to me, BD comes before my personal emotions towards the people involved. If I support the team, I am bound to root for the players to do well in that league.

The players could have handled it differently, however, they probably wanted to prove a point about BCB. They had a personal axe to grind against BCB and I understand their misguided frustration. If they had a good PR person, their concerns/complaints would not have sounded like whinning. I do not question their decision to take the pay-hike and join a lucrative league. They will be facing better quality opponents and bring back those experience to the domestic circuit. If BCCI and ICL ever get to kiss and make up, this players will get another shot at representing BD, IF they are good enough. When that happens, most of us will lin up to support them. So, as it remains, I do not hate them for joining ICL, I am dissapointed that they were forced to retire so they can make some $$$, and I am a little amused by the fact that some of them were expecting to be in the playing eleven with their recent poor performances. The most absurd excuse was from Dhiman.

BANFAN

September 15, 2008, 11:44 PM

WOOT WOOT !

:)

TV channel will otherwise be showing ICL. Instead of watching & hearing Lahore Badsha..... I would love to watch & hear about Dhaka Wariors. 1 player & 1 match, IPL was an insult for BD. These boys have challenged the myth, "BD Can't Play competitive Cricket" lets see what they can prove.

Tintin

September 15, 2008, 11:49 PM

They will be facing better quality opponents and bring back those experience to the domestic circuit.

If BCCI gets it way, they will be banned from all domestic cricket in Bangladesh. So far, England is the only country that let ICL players appear in domestic cricket, and that was after they threatened to go to the court.

The national team will not be affected in the short term, but domestic cricket will be deprived of many experienced players. The next bunch of players who make their international debut for Bangladesh will be even less experienced and skilled than the current bunch when they first appeared.

but Nafees, Aftab, Reza, Ghosh, Nazim (i am sure he is going) are not allowed to do that... they should be jailed for cheating on the team and country...

Ya, you said it all.
I also think that for plyrs like Bashar or otheres except Nafees, Aftab, Reza, Ghosh it's ok to join bcse they won't get chance in national team.
But for the other 4 plyrs it is so selfish to leave Bd eventhough they surely had the chance to come back in the team.

Abid_Khan

September 16, 2008, 06:41 AM

They betrayed us. They will get US$200,000 but when they come home, the bangladeshi fans will just spit on them and burn their house on fire. What a shame...

mafizraju

September 16, 2008, 08:06 AM

If BCCI gets it way, they will be banned from all domestic cricket in Bangladesh. So far, England is the only country that let ICL players appear in domestic cricket, and that was after they threatened to go to the court.

The national team will not be affected in the short term, but domestic cricket will be deprived of many experienced players. The next bunch of players who make their international debut for Bangladesh will be even less experienced and skilled than the current bunch when they first appeared.

and this is the right point. ECB took more pragmatic approach on this thing. I want to see Bangladesh do the same, instead of taking emotinaly biased decision. True Players have mentioned few things in public which certainly looks like being emotionaly biased.

I say its the BCB who has to take the responsibility of the distance and not ban these people from at least domestic circuit. Its a good news that BCB has not accepted their resignation but threatened to go to the court. But in the court of Law Players will win and in the mean time relationaships will go even more sour. I say BCB accept the decision of the players Given Players Play Domestic Cricket and be prepared for national team. As simple as that.

By doing that there will be pressure from BCCI. But Kewies, West Indies and ECB will suport us on this matter. PCB should not be too far either as they were affected by ICL and BCCI quarrel.

I hope BCB takes the more pragmatic approach and instead being emotionaly biased and bend to the pressure of mighty India. Its time that they set a competitive tone to players of country where Organised Dissent is hardly to comeby.

Kabir

September 16, 2008, 08:33 AM

The national team will not be affected in the short term, but domestic cricket will be deprived of many experienced players. The next bunch of players who make their international debut for Bangladesh will be even less experienced and skilled than the current bunch when they first appeared.

Err...I don't see any value that these players provide to the domestic league. Among the highest scorers, their names rarely appear. Among the leading wicket takers, their names rarely appear as well.

That is not to say that they have left a void in there...and it will take time to correct it. But that, IMHO, will help BD cricket in the long run. It will help in improved managemenet, and BCB and the BD cricket clubs will know that they will have to make it worthwhile for these players to stay once they are performing well in the highest of the domestic level.

Among the six players, I think only Aftab had some value left in him. But I personally don't think he had anything more to offer to BD cricket.

What I see out of this whole thing is that, a Bangladeshi team gets into the Indian league, which will give more exposure to our cricket...and that will be better for our cricket in the long run.

Tigers_eye

September 16, 2008, 08:51 AM

Freedom of choices. The only thing the board can ask for the contracted players, a compensation. :) (Manay share of the loot - Loot because they don't deserve that amount anyways)

Not bad.... 41% Fans are supporting the players... its close to mid level support.

Its more than what I was expecting at this level, specially for hujukey Bangalee fans.

Baundule

September 16, 2008, 05:06 PM

Good luck, Warriors.

Trigger_Tiger

September 16, 2008, 05:10 PM

I support the team, I support the players in the team, for the team, and only as a team and nothing less!

I personally feel saddened by the departure of a few bright stars. But whatever happens, life moves on and this is not the end of the world. While sure I am disappointed by some of their departure and decision, I am not out for their blood. They are afterall representing our Nation in someway. Be it for the money, they were in the national team for the money as well. It was their job and not only a matter of patriotic duty.
Even though patriotism was a package that came with that bag, with this one, it is finance first and nation second only.

As fans, it is best to act matured and remain fans of the game. Hold our head up high and be proud of our nation and all that represent it for the good. They are representing it anyways. Love them or hate them, I still love cricket, I still love my country and would support it in whatever event it is represented.

In the name of true national spirit, let all of us be matured (more than those who left.....sham-fans and sham-players alike) and keep on moving forward.

zia

September 16, 2008, 05:14 PM

There is no way they can perform better than our national side. They will only bring disgrace to Dhaka's name. Any one want to bet? I will not watch their games. I am commited to :flag: and will not deal with traitors.

Trigger_Tiger

September 16, 2008, 05:22 PM

There is no way they can perform better than our national side. They will only bring disgrace to Dhaka's name. Any one want to bet? I will not watch their games. I am commited to :flag: and will not deal with traitors.

Lalalalala.....they are playing in the ICL BECAUSE they aren't as good as the National Side. Sheesh! Disgrace to Dhaka's name? Leaving was quite disgraceful. Considering how ICL is considered "a disgraced tournament" it doesn't matter much though does it.

Lalalalala.....they are playing in the ICL BECAUSE they aren't as good as the National Side. Sheesh! Disgrace to Dhaka's name? Leaving was quite disgraceful. Considering how ICL is considered "a disgraced tournament" it doesn't matter much though does it.

Best of luck though. Shine with those swords o mighty ones.
.
.
.
.
.
Btw, zia, didn't you find that picture with the "Solemani Torobari" hilarious :-p? Glamour. Something that befits SN anyways *khek*!
I saw the swords. After their flop venture they will use them to "harakiri". :lol:

AsifTheManRahman

September 16, 2008, 08:32 PM

ATMR, revolution my arse. Mathai tuley rakso eder. Amake team e neina so aami quit korlaam kintu, or coach amake buro BHAM dakse, aami khelbona, or coach amake 'dinner' e niye jaini, khelbona. Soja shapta boluk, aami mediocre player (BD standard e), ei shob competition e jete parbona, jibone cricket kheleo $30-$200K pabona, ei shujog pelam, niye nilam. Or, ektu chalaki kore bolte parey, desher cricket ke international stage e niye jawar uddeshshe eta korlam. Dekhben, ICL e bhalo performance korey, okhan theke quit kore abar desher hoye khelbo inshallah.
I am actually very optimistic about this move. The news has hit the headlines in several mediums over the past couple of days and expectedly so. Cricket is, after all, a very boring game and had it not been one of the sports that we can hope to excel in one day, I would probably not have followed it since the age of seven. The only way to make it more competitive is to let the players - the most important assets of the game, mind you - play wherever and whenever they like. Let there be as much cricket (especially club cricket, where players of different origins can mix and match and share their knowledge of the game) as possible. As it is, the game doesn't do enough for its players, not at least when compared to, say, soccer, which IMO should be a role model for cricket.

A little over three decades ago, a bunch of rebels led by Kerry Packer were going to change the game forever. Some did it for the money, some were labeled traitors in their respective countries. Thirty years after their revolution, a young, spirited Bangladeshi side backed by a hundred and forty million people defeated New Zealand en route to decapitating the giants India and South Africa at an ODI world cup event. Packer's men had not only ignited sparks among followers of the game, but tread a path that led to the joys of many a cricket fan in my country.

While I will miss some of the Warriors and find their reasons to retire rather amateurish, I am glad that they have made the move. The 50 over match has long been a dead game and has to go in order to save cricket. If we are going to have more teams compete for the top spot in international cricket (as opposed to one, as we currently have), if we are to see cricket as an Olympic sport one day, the game has to spread far and wide across the globe. The only way that is going to happen is through the introduction of a format that will perk the interests of cricket illiterate brains; and, of course, through letting more and more leagues evolve and prosper. The players should be able to make as much as they can because, at the end of the day, they are the ones in charge of entertaining us.

With the amount of media attention that the Warriors have had over the past forty eight hours, I hope more players from around the world will follow their path and invertebrate bodies such as the ICC will eventually give in to the inevitable and legalize these rebel leagues. As for the fans, we are such hypocrites! Team e thakle ekta maair o matite pore na, team theke baair howe jawa matro galagali shuru howe jaay.

Support the Warriors, because hopefully, they have started something that will change cricket as we know it today.

Fazal

September 16, 2008, 09:22 PM

I am actually very optimistic about this move. The news has hit the headlines in several mediums over the past couple of days and expectedly so. Cricket is, after all, a very boring game and had it not been one of the sports that we can hope to excel in one day, I would probably not have followed it since the age of seven. The only way to make it more competitive is to let the players - the most important assets of the game, mind you - play wherever and whenever they like. Let there be as much cricket (especially club cricket, where players of different origins can mix and match and share their knowledge of the game) as possible. As it is, the game doesn't do enough for its players, not at least when compared to, say, soccer, which IMO should be a role model for cricket.

A little over three decades ago, a bunch of rebels led by Kerry Packer were going to change the game forever. Some did it for the money, some were labeled traitors in their respective countries. Thirty years after their revolution, a young, spirited Bangladeshi side backed by a hundred and forty million people defeated New Zealand en route to decapitating the giants India and South Africa at an ODI world cup event. Packer's men had not only ignited sparks among followers of the game, but tread a path that led to the joys of many a cricket fan in my country.

While I will miss some of the Warriors and find their reasons to retire rather amateurish, I am glad that they have made the move. The 50 over match has long been a dead game and has to go in order to save cricket. If we are going to have more teams compete for the top spot in international cricket (as opposed to one, as we currently have), if we are to see cricket as an Olympic sport one day, the game has to spread far and wide across the globe. The only way that is going to happen is through the introduction of a format that will perk the interests of cricket illiterate brains; and, of course, through letting more and more leagues evolve and prosper. The players should be able to make as much as they can because, at the end of the day, they are the ones in charge of entertaining us.

With the amount of media attention that the Warriors have had over the past forty eight hours, I hope more players from around the world will follow their path and invertebrate bodies such as the ICC will eventually give in to the inevitable and legalize these rebel leagues. As for the fans, we are such hypocrites! Team e thakle ekta maair o matite pore na, team theke baair howe jawa matro galagali shuru howe jaay.

Support the Warriors, because hopefully, they have started something that will change cricket as we know it today.

Exactly !!! Great minds think alike !!!

Trigger_Tiger

September 16, 2008, 09:52 PM

Adding on, on a positive note, this shows exactly how important Bangladesh's existence is in the cricketing world. Chappell and co. talks about us all the time.....if we were not so important would they? And now after this, they act like this is the end to Bangladesh's cricketing prospect since our "best" cricketers left us! Well weren't those "best" cricketers the ones who comprised our teams which were criticized by theses same folks from time to time?

Headlining time and again is Bangladesh. That in itself is a positive move :)!

Not to mention how the ICL All Stars, Bangladesh, India and Pakistan would be taking part in the ICL World Series ONLY!

Hmm.....now that is some importance none can ignore :)!

Zaheed Mahmood

September 16, 2008, 10:05 PM

It was may be justified for the national discards Rafiq and Bashar to make the Dhaka Warrior and join ICL, but Shahriar, Aftab, Alok, Dhiman, Reza and Hossain were on national payroll and their requests for retirement at this age from all international cricket only to join ICL only brings up the pathetic picture of how these youngsters could give up the pride and embarrass the whole nation to go after the big money!! Cricket is the top sport now in our country and the whole nation adore those who made it to the national team! New Zealand now fears whether it would be right for them to play against a weakened team with 6 of its regular players leaving the side! None will be surprised if ICC now questions BD's test status since 6 of its regular player retire all of a sudden and may suggest scrapping off the test status temporarily as was done for Zimbabwe!! The countries that have been against our test status will only be too happy to welcome our rebel players’ exodus to ICL!!

Zaheed

Zaheed Mahmood

September 16, 2008, 10:15 PM

Couldn’t help giving all the plaudits to Ash if he really had refused the lure of highest 15 crore take payment from ICL for the sake of his country! Whatever rumor is there on him, whatever lean patch of form he has recently been in, he deserves this praise!!

It was may be justified for the national discards Rafiq and Bashar to make the Dhaka Warrior and join ICL, but Shahriar, Aftab, Alok, Dhiman, Reza and Hossain were on national payroll and their requests for retirement at this age from all international cricket only to join ICL only brings up the pathetic picture of how these youngsters could give up the pride and embarrass the whole nation to go after the big money!! Cricket is the top sport now in our country and the whole nation adore those who made it to the national team! New Zealand now fears whether it would be right for them to play against a weakened team with 6 of its regular players leaving the side! None will be surprised if ICC now questions BD's test status since 6 of its regular player retire all of a sudden and may suggest scrapping off the test status temporarily as was done for Zimbabwe!! The countries that have been against our test status will only be too happy to welcome our rebel players’ exodus to ICL!!

Zaheed

Don't worry. Nothing will happen like this.

NZ will tour BD. They've already sent their A-team to compete in the Tri-series in India.

Our new BD team will give a good fight this time. All the craps are gone. We will see better players now.

dash

September 16, 2008, 10:59 PM

Ill support them

Dhakablues

September 17, 2008, 12:37 AM

Exactly !!! Great minds think alike !!!

Count me in that minority club!!!

Any Bangladeshi players,, anywhere in the world playing, we will support them and will pay whatever to watch their games. And if it is especially for My Birthplace Dhaka.. I am the warrior to defend them when they fight the Badshahs..Let the game begin!!!

checkmate

September 17, 2008, 07:02 AM

It might be a blessing in disguise,ICL needs Recognition,Players need money,The domestic Cricket might get a bit more competitive,Coz now players know,if BCB ignores,ICL will see them.and They will attack as many board as they can, so that ICC recognizes them.

checkmate

September 17, 2008, 07:07 AM

I am actually very optimistic about this move. The news has hit the headlines in several mediums over the past couple of days and expectedly so. Cricket is, after all, a very boring game and had it not been one of the sports that we can hope to excel in one day, I would probably not have followed it since the age of seven. The only way to make it more competitive is to let the players - the most important assets of the game, mind you - play wherever and whenever they like. Let there be as much cricket (especially club cricket, where players of different origins can mix and match and share their knowledge of the game) as possible. As it is, the game doesn't do enough for its players, not at least when compared to, say, soccer, which IMO should be a role model for cricket.

A little over three decades ago, a bunch of rebels led by Kerry Packer were going to change the game forever. Some did it for the money, some were labeled traitors in their respective countries. Thirty years after their revolution, a young, spirited Bangladeshi side backed by a hundred and forty million people defeated New Zealand en route to decapitating the giants India and South Africa at an ODI world cup event. Packer's men had not only ignited sparks among followers of the game, but tread a path that led to the joys of many a cricket fan in my country.

While I will miss some of the Warriors and find their reasons to retire rather amateurish, I am glad that they have made the move. The 50 over match has long been a dead game and has to go in order to save cricket. If we are going to have more teams compete for the top spot in international cricket (as opposed to one, as we currently have), if we are to see cricket as an Olympic sport one day, the game has to spread far and wide across the globe. The only way that is going to happen is through the introduction of a format that will perk the interests of cricket illiterate brains; and, of course, through letting more and more leagues evolve and prosper. The players should be able to make as much as they can because, at the end of the day, they are the ones in charge of entertaining us.

With the amount of media attention that the Warriors have had over the past forty eight hours, I hope more players from around the world will follow their path and invertebrate bodies such as the ICC will eventually give in to the inevitable and legalize these rebel leagues. As for the fans, we are such hypocrites! Team e thakle ekta maair o matite pore na, team theke baair howe jawa matro galagali shuru howe jaay.

Support the Warriors, because hopefully, they have started something that will change cricket as we know it today.

EXACTLY.Competition Improves the quality.Now The monopoly of BCCI might come to a halt,and ICL might get recognised

Sovik

September 17, 2008, 07:19 AM

don't know about others but i will support them. i am sure there are many bangladeshi left their jobs in bangladesh and went to work abroad. after all its their lives and they have the rights to do what is the best for them and the families

WarWolf

September 17, 2008, 07:41 AM

Brother Asir, we are clearly leading now with a difference of 11.

ialbd

September 17, 2008, 07:49 AM

whats there to support? glory at the retired/budda league called ICL?

i wish this was ranji trophy or atleast IPL. there is absolutely nothing to gain (cricket wise) from this....

Support the Warriors, because hopefully, they have started something that will change cricket as we know it today.

Supporting the Warriors is not the main issue here. The overall impact on BD cricket for temporary basis is in jeopardy though most of them not in the national test squad or have some sort of bad patches going on. This new move, new evolution could be good in disguise but not for BD at this time. If we had more suitable pipeline players who could have been perfect replacements/backups, definitely we would not care about the move. Imagine what will happen, when more players will live after playing 3 years for National team, do you think we can have quality pipeline players as their replacements. Also just banning will not solve this, rather BCB has to change the strategy of retaining players and needs to have robust policy to develop these players. Players are becoming more professional what we lacked before in Nannu, Bulbul era but professionalism is good but using it for bad purpose at the wrong time will just destroy the value of professionalism. Players and BCB should have chose a spoke person before rushing into these resignations and banning issues. As lots of posters here mentioned recent act is a reactive act and Authorithy did not take the matter seriously at all.
This new development has more bad impact than the good impact for the current BD cricket.

thebest

September 17, 2008, 01:21 PM

don't compare ICL with the Kerry Packer revolution though they had similar motive - market share. In Packer's circus best of the bests played; ICL consist of some discard and some promising. Packer actually reaped all the national team bar India. ICL none. Packer revolutionize cricket - like color kits, balls and night cricket. I could not find one though some said City base franchise may work. But I have doubt. Cricket is and always a nationalist game unlike football which is truely city base franchise; both from players and supporter perspective. For example just few days ago Jimmi Carrager said he accept defeat playing for England rather easily than for Liverpool. You would not heard those even from HB that it hurts more if they lose playing for Dhaka Cowards than Bangladesh.
I would not even tag them as rebel. That means you and I are always rebel whenever we change our employer. But at the same time I would not support them because I have no emotional attachment with the team.

checkmate

September 17, 2008, 02:52 PM

Supporting the Warriors is not the main issue here. The overall impact on BD cricket for temporary basis is in jeopardy though most of them not in the national test squad or have some sort of bad patches going on. This new move, new evolution could be good in disguise but not for BD at this time. If we had more suitable pipeline players who could have been perfect replacements/backups, definitely we would not care about the move. Imagine what will happen, when more players will live after playing 3 years for National team, do you think we can have quality pipeline players as their replacements. Also just banning will not solve this, rather BCB has to change the strategy of retaining players and needs to have robust policy to develop these players. Players are becoming more professional what we lacked before in Nannu, Bulbul era but professionalism is good but using it for bad purpose at the wrong time will just destroy the value of professionalism. Players and BCB should have chose a spoke person before rushing into these resignations and banning issues. As lots of posters here mentioned recent act is a reactive act and Authorithy did not take the matter seriously at all.
This new development has more bad impact than the good impact for the current BD cricket.

ICC Have never run Cricket professionally,decision were based on Money,Power.I think BCB is more at Fault here, they never had a consistent Selection Policy,It actually might Improve the Status of Bangladesh Cricket, Domestic cricket Might get more Competitive,Players will perform coz now they know,There are other people who look at them.And Now IF BCB Takes the Right Initiative we might Get Better,Consistant Players.Even in Football,Club football contributes more to the game,Improving the player.they Most South Ameriacan Football players play in European Clubs,I dont think The south American, African Football Board has that Money to develop these Players,the Motivation for these players come from the Club.What these Strong Headed ICC Should do is Legalise ICL.

meazz1

September 17, 2008, 03:00 PM

From a cricket fan's point of view, I think it's great that these players joined ICL.
This gives more fuel to the nation team to rise and show some serious improvement.

I have now two BD teams to follow.

thasan

September 17, 2008, 03:02 PM

yes yes and yes!!! i will be supporting them.
shame on lame BCB. if what i read in cricinfo about alok is right, then the whole BCB admin should be kicked out for being stupid and arrogant, not the players

WarWolf

September 17, 2008, 03:21 PM

don't compare ICL with the Kerry Packer revolution though they had similar motive - market share. In Packer's circus best of the bests played; ICL consist of some discard and some promising. Packer actually reaped all the national team bar India. ICL none. Packer revolutionize cricket - like color kits, balls and night cricket. I could not find one though some said City base franchise may work. But I have doubt. Cricket is and always a nationalist game unlike football which is truely city base franchise; both from players and supporter perspective. For example just few days ago Jimmi Carrager said he accept defeat playing for England rather easily than for Liverpool. You would not heard those even from HB that it hurts more if they lose playing for Dhaka Cowards than Bangladesh.
I would not even tag them as rebel. That means you and I are always rebel whenever we change our employer. But at the same time I would support them because I have no emotional attachment with the team.

Very good post.

WarWolf

September 18, 2008, 07:06 PM

Any one changed his initial view?

Roni_uk

September 18, 2008, 07:17 PM

OFCOURSE they did the right thing... I dont understand what the fuss is about. I am glad that some of these players are getting well paid at last and almost all the players had some contribution to the country at some stage of their life and they deserve a chance to be part of the international arena. L

Let it be Dhaka Worrior, lets not forget they are still representing 'Bangladesh' -our country. Whether its the national team, or Team A or B - the most important thing is they represent Bangladesh and I know I will be watching Dhaka Worrier in ICL with my Bangladeshi flag in hand!