Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIINAL OMISSIIN BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie. Otherwise, a lawyer would be perpetuating fraud upon the court. At that point, the lawyer is under an obligation to withdraw from the case (according to the rules of professional conduct). The lawyer is not required to divulge the reason for the withdrawal, in fact, it is improper to disclose such reasons due to attorney/client privilege but it would usually give the judge a good clue based on timing of the withdrawal. In short, a lawyer cannot stand by and watch the client lie to the court...."

, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page.

COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
(Attorney for Carlos Gonzalez in child support proceedings.
Order for a judgement of "current" child support was entered by the judgement on DECEMBER 22, 2010. "RESERVING" ONCE AGAIN ARREARS ANT PAST DUE CHILD SUPPORT BY WHICH PATRRNITY WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2006 (A HISTORICAL DATA/RECORD OF UNCONCIONABLE DELAYS/PREVIOUSLY HEARD BY JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES, GEORGE WINSLO AND JUDGE ROCHE.)

...CONTINUED ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES ...

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Ethics Opinion 246

A Lawyer’s Obligation to Report Another Lawyer’s Misconduct

A lawyer suing another lawyer for malpractice on behalf of a client is required by Rule 8.3 to report to bar disciplinary authorities the conduct that is the subject of the malpractice action, if she has sufficient knowledge of the pertinent facts, if her knowledge is not protected as a client confidence or secret, and if the conduct of the other lawyer both constitutes a violation of an ethical rule and raises a substantial question as to the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness in other respects. Where a lawyer learns of another lawyer’s misconduct in the course of representing her client, and the information about the misconduct constitutes a confidence or secret within the meaning of Rule 1.6, that Rule prohibits her reporting it without the client’s consent. If, after having been made fully aware of any possible adverse consequences for his ultimate recovery, the client does consent, then neither Rule 1.6 nor Rule 1.3(b)(2) bars reporting. On the facts of this case, the Committee is unable to conclude that the misconduct at issue (failure to comply with the statute of limitations and representation of conflicting interests) gives rise to an obligation under Rule 8.3 to report.

Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIINAL OMISSIIN BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie. Otherwise, a lawyer would be perpetuating fraud upon the court. At that point, the lawyer is under an obligation to withdraw from the case (according to the rules of professional conduct). The lawyer is not required to divulge the reason for the withdrawal, in fact, it is improper to disclose such reasons due to attorney/client privilege but it would usually give the judge a good clue based on timing of the withdrawal. In short, a lawyer cannot stand by and watch the client lie to the court...."

, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page.

COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
(Attorney for Carlos Gonzalez in child support proceedings.
Order for a judgement of "current" child support was entered by the judgement on DECEMBER 22, 2010. "RESERVING" ONCE AGAIN ARREARS ANT PAST DUE CHILD SUPPORT BY WHICH PATRRNITY WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2006 (A HISTORICAL DATA/RECORD OF UNCONCIONABLE DELAYS/PREVIOUSLY HEARD BY JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES, GEORGE WINSLO AND JUDGE ROCHE.)

...CONTINUED ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES ...