Philosopher
in recent years, some experiments based on some empirical research conclusion,
questioning in semantic theory construction to resort to language intuition as
arguments, the method of reliability, David began actively considering study
about the philosophers of language intuition. He looks at the meaning of
language intuition. The reliability of language intuition; The essence of
language intuition is discussed from three aspects. It is of great importance
to study the ontological and epistemological problems of the world.

David,
in the theoretical construction of causal language intuition as the premise,
starting from the definition of language intuition as to language intuition to
justify, according to the methodology of naturalism of language intuition is
given definition: "language intuition is the individual's reaction to the
phenomenon, it load experience and has its own processing center, has a direct,
the reflection characteristics, rarely rely on conscious reasoning".
Davit's definition of language intuition has two characteristics: people are
presupposed to understand the existence of the world through language; It is
proposed to summarize the systematic observation and thinking of reality with
experience theory, and to recognize the individual's grasp of reality on the
basis of recognizing that intuition is experience and can be wrong.

David,
it is pointed out that intuition is the direct reaction of the individual to
the world first, the reaction is metaphysics, it by linguists expertise do
defense for this reaction, the philosophers of language intuition theory. David
further assume that all of these instincts are experts on the reflection of
language data, into the brain were obtained through the access to the corpus of
some conscious state, and then continue to translate into when using apriori
unconsciousness. Therefore, in a way, we should believe that a person's
linguistic intuition is based on his or her professional knowledge.

Davitt
believes that the reliability of intuition is demonstrated by its role in
language. Intuition is essentially an empirical judgment that we should oppose
expert intuition with the use of empirical language, rather than with the
intuition of the general public. The best way to understand tested intuitions
is to interpret "ingredients" in terms of attributive rather than
procedural terms.

Language
intuition comes from the grammar of evidence for them. On the one hand, it is
common to talk about a person's "voice of ability" as a kind of
"knowledge". On the other hand, when we follow knowledge of the
"voice of power" of the masses, we simply assume it is knowledge.
Davit believes this is a great skill and ability to acquire a "competent
voice." This ability shifts between the meaningful abilities that the mind
wants to express, and eventually forms the formal language that the voice wants
to express, increasing the utility of intuition.

He
argues that the meta-language intuition is not evidence, because it is a
priori, not empirical. Ordinary users use grammar as evidence of linguistic
intuition. And linguists claim that "intuition should rely primarily on
its own linguists." However, they may think that a speaker's verbal
instincts are not unique. In terms of intuition, we equate it with logical thinking
activities like typing and playing chess. A person can find data to react to
because their intuition has the ability to generate relevant data. Like the
inept empirical responses, they derive from empirical observations. The data
mentioned here, we must mention the "mild explanation".

The
so-called "data" of mild interpretation is mainly a model to
understand language data. Data is a language form. According to the gentle
explanation, intuition provides only this data. It does not provide any information
about the data and true or false language propositions. The mild explanation
also requires a relatively direct cognitive path: language concept is the
language expressed according to rules. The rules here may well represent but do
not represent a central reflective data system. In fact, Chomsky used the
principle of analogy to discover that the visual system has similar intuitive
rules.

Psychologists
also believe that language is an implicit learning, which is a gradual
accumulation of intuitive rules. Therefore, in general, when a normal person is
asked a word of a string, he first simulates the behavior and tries to generate
or understand the string, so as to exercise his language ability. So the supply
of capacity is based on intuition, and language provides intuition. It is important
to note here, pat orchid? Russell's "deny our informal conversation may
constitute a language". According to this stance, a non-formal language in
which we say that "every language is a metaclanguage, and for that language"
verbal activity."

Language
intuition is the key evidence for the construction of language theory. How to
explain the cognitive pattern behind intuition is the focus of linguists.

Language
intuition is the product of cognitive insight in the ability module, which
exists and is disturbed by the results of the speaker himself. This is obvious:
here's some intuition may reflect some kind of "voice", but the
"voice" may include people's beliefs, linguists and the theory of
intuition may reflect their theoretical bias. As a result, the resulting
syntactic theory increasingly relies on the intuition of experimenters. In
short, the idea that the speaker's verbal intuition is a product of cognitive
insight in the ability module is acceptable if the "voice of competence"
is correct.

Language
intuition is a process of accumulating psychological impressions of the
objective world. According to davitt, it is through the experience and
knowledge accumulated in the past that linguists have acquired a kind of
intuitive cognitive ability. After the overall investigation of the target
system, under the leadership of this intuitive cognitive ability, they will
form a psychological impression of the objective world, namely the structural
sketch of the objective world. These efforts set the tone for future concrete
model building. This shows that intuition is a cumulative process, not a direct
one, as Chomsky believes. And intuition plays an important role in the
representation of language cognitive model theory.

Language
intuition is embodied with the body cognition, which is a kind of generative
cognition. Because intuition is sensitive and intentional. That is to say, on
the surface of intuition, you can defend the perceptual properties. People can
talk a lot about pain or red feelings. If you want to complete the
interpretation of the human consciousness about intuition produce activity, you
need to belong to a related to the physical consciousness, attitude and belief
system of body image with belong to without awareness under the control of the
senses - sports ability system of the body schema integration, thus form a
whole body of ideas could be involved and the constructive theory of cognitive
science research framework.