On Jan 3, 6:07 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Jan 3, 2:41 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:>> > Koobee Wublee wrote:> > > Given two hypotheses where each is an antithesis to and thus> > > invalidates the other, the common sense says one must find experiments> > > to validate only one of the hypotheses. This is scientific method.>> > > Tom has bragged about these experimental verifications for SR since he> > > became a priest to SR long away. Yet, these experimental> > > verifications (every single one of them with no exceptions) also> > > verify any of the antitheses to SR. Thus, claiming SR valid because> > > it is verified by all sorts of experiments is just plain stupid, lack> > > of professionalism, misapplication of scientific method, and downright> > > deceitful. This is not science anymore but a voodoo cult. <shrug>>> > > Antitheses to SR are:>> > > ** Voigt transformation> > > ** Larmor?s transformation> > > ** Infinite transformations discovered by Lorentz>> > > Each one says the Aether must exist. Each one satisfies the null> > > results of the MMX and more. <shrug>>> > > paul andersen has play the mathemagic trick in the twins? paradox.>> > My mathematic trick:http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html>> Koobee Wublee knows the little professor paul andersen just would not> resist to get his butt kicked again. Let?s spank more of the little> professor?s ass. Ahahaha...>> > > Now, he is demonstrating that he does not understand scientific> > > method.>> > Quite.> > It is quite clear that the Wubleean version of the scientific> > method is way beyond my mental abilities.>> Only to the little professor. Please allow Koobee Wublee to repeat> the essence of scientific method. There is nothing wrong about the> statement below. <shrug>>> ?Given two hypotheses where each is an antithesis to and thus> invalidates the other, common sense says one must find experiments to> validate only one of these hypotheses.?

KW, you can never teach the willfully blind to see a rainbow.

> The exact episode is like the children?s story ?Blind men and the> elephant?. Apparently, paul is too busy chasing chickens near the> Arctic Circle that he lost the meaning of what scientific method is.> Gee! You can even take hints from children?s story books.> Ahahahaha...>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_Men_and_the_Elephant>> Please do bookmark this one. So, a few months or years down the road,> we can only again laugh at the little professor from Norway.> Ahahahaha...>> > > The little professor from Norway (Trondheim to be exact) is> > > an illiterate in science. What do you expect from an Einstein> > > Dingleberry anyway? :-)>> > > Koobee Wublee hopes the sperm lover will do as you wish. Why don?t> > > you haul it away as a fumble from Koobee Wublee? Bookmark it, and> > > save Koobee Wublee the work in the future. Come on, paul. Do it.> > > Oh, still sore, eh? :-) Looking for every possible opportunities to> > > get back at Koobee Wublee? <shrug>>> > Your argument are as lethal as always.>> You bet. <shrug>

> Where>> ** B^2 = v^2 / c^2>> It can easily be>> Delta_A = (delta ? blah blah blah) / sqrt(1 ? B^2)>> The bottom line is the equation describing the segment of Minkowski> spacetime using your labeling system:>> ** c^2 dt_AC^2 ? ds_AC^2 = c^2 dt_BC^2 ? ds_BC^2>> Where>> ** ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2>> The equation can be written as follows.>> ** dt_AC^2 (1 ? B_AC^2) = dt_BC^2 (1 ? B_BC^2)>> Where>> ** B_AC c = Speed of C as observed by A> ** B_BC c = Speed of C as observed by B>> From A?s point of view trying to compare the rate of time flows with> C, B and C are the same. Thus, the equation above simplifies into the> following.>> ** dt_AB^2 (1 ? B_AB^2) = dt_BB^2 (1 ? B_BB^2) = dt_BB^2>> Where>> ** B_AB c = Speed of B as observed by A> ** B_BB c = 0>> On the other hand, from C?s pint of view observing A, B and A are the> same. Thus, the spacetime equation has to be interpreted differently> as the following.>> ** dt_AA^2 (1 ? B_AA^2) = dt_BA^2 (1 ? B_BA^2) = dt_AA^2>> Where>> ** B_AA c = 0> ** B_BA c = Speed of A as observed by B>> The only time when there is no paradox is when (B_AB = B_BA = 0).> This is what the Lorentz symmetry is all about such that there is no> special treatment on the one that is moving, and the little professor> from Norway fails miserably on this one. <SPANK> <SPANK> <SPANK>>> It is time for paul to join another paul aka sylvia, absolute dick,> little bitch, etc. better known as PD for another divine vision to> resolve the paradox --- projection of proper time. Tom used to> believe in that crap, but he is now back to the first divine vision> promoted by promoted by Olivia Newton-John?s grandfather, Max Born.> <shrug>

Nice connection! ONJ and Born. "Have you never been mellow, have younever tried, to find the comfort, from inside..." try Dan Singh withQT's VV of Travolta fame. Sorry, I had one of those greasy freethought moments.

Actually KW, I was searching for your recent Zardoz reference, andinstead, found beautiful Born Olivia. Still perusing threads...

> > And you made me aware that I in this paper:> >http://www.gethome.no/paulba/pdf/Stellar_aberration.pdf> > had confused parallax and aberration:> >http://tinyurl.com/nje25b>> The great post of Yours Truly happened in 2008. The following excerpt> still applies today.>> ?Please pick up all your shit from this thread and apologize to> Darwin,> myself yours truly, and many others. I will still give you a kick in> the butt for your barbaric attitude.>> ?In the meantime, it is crucial to apply the principle of relativity> for ANY LOW SPEED applications. This includes stellar aberration. It> is merely a part of applications on Doppler effect. <shrug>>> ?Kowtow! Now, get lost, and stop whining.?>> That original pdf paper in 2008 had the gross error of computing> aberration without using the principle of relativity. Why did you> replace it with a 2010 version which happened after the discussion of> 2008? The whole thing must be really haunting the little professor.> No wonder his is still too sore. Ahahahaha...>> > [Rest of complaints on his sore butt snipped]>> <ONE MORE KICK IN THE ASS>