Pages

When things are investigated, knowledge is extended. When knowledge is extended, the will becomes sincere. When the will is sincere, the mind is correct. When the mind is correct, the self is cultivated. -- Confucius

Politically correct ideals are garbage: true wisdom comes from decades of deep thought and neutral observation. Only a so-called sociopath could ascertain wisdom from this crazy world in a neutral way. Cool thoughts- uncorrupted by modern politics, social norms, or societal ideals- are required for wisdom. Questioning everything, and going against the grain on all universally accepted norms is the path to true intelligence. The Gods notice this.

9/1/14

Awhile back, I was trying to figure out just how many foreign bases the US had, and learned that site after site reposted the same old exaggerated maps over and over. [Russia was labeled on several as having a US military presence, due to US Marines stationed there as embassy gate guards, for example..] I researched it from the ground up, and made a new list, which disproves all of the sorry old outdated maps people are still reposting to this day. IMHO my list and blog article are the most up to date and accurate info on the net regarding how many bases there are, and where...

Now, a similar event has occurred: just how many nations have HAARP-like facilities, and where?, I wondered.

HAARP is an ionospheric heater with a large array of huge antennae. It is supposedly to do research, but what it is really for is anyone's guess: the federal government is involved, as well as DARPA. Many claim that when the ionosphere is heated it rises like a bubble, creating a space the atmosphere and its jet streams flow into. This tampering with jet streams at certain times and places could easily alter weather around the world. Sounds logical, though this blogger fails to see how any of this causes earthquakes, which it is frequently blamed for as well. Whatever its purpose, what countries do have ionospheric heaters? If they are opposing nations could they be using them as weather-weapons upon one another?

It turns out the conspiracists have latched onto this like piranhas after goldfish. There is one map that everyone reposts endlessly, which connects all of their alleged HAARP-like sites with lines, implying they are synced somehow as well. The few remaining maps out there show dozens, some even hundreds of places as being HAARP facilities. How can there be that many, and how do antenna arrays pointed straight up to affect the ionosphere connect like microwave beams on cell towers? They don't.

Exasperated at all of the conspiratorical nonsense some have tied into this, as well as their dot-happy maps which make no sense, I looked into it my own way. The most logical and scarce maps said what? Official sources said what? Logic demanded what? Few nations have the funds nor scientists to build these things on a whim, nor any reasons to. Though India has many brainy scientists and a large budget, they have bigger concerns than the plasmatics of the ionosphere, such as hunger, Pakistani threats, overpopulation, and animal control. So do they really have a string of 24 HAARP-type facilities down their East coast as some maps show?

Any site that even mentions certain words can be considered inaccurate information sources, as their authors are nuts. So if you get onto a website and you see any of the following words, take it all with a grain of salt (if they believe in that garbage they will say anything as the gullible hypesters they are): illuminati, NWO, orgone, FEMA coffins, Mena, real ID, microchip, nibiru, planet x, leer, lazar, and others. I am not one of those so-called 'skeptics' that poo-poos everything with my nose in the air. I do believe UFOs are real, and have an interest in bigfoot and cryptozoology. I also know the government is a secretive corporate funded evil entity that compulsively lies to the public, wastes our money, and does all kinds of stuff to endanger us. But does that mean we all have to go bananas making outlandish accusations without a scintilla of proof? Just like we have 'troops' in Russia, just like we have 'FEMA coffins', just like there are hundreds of HAARP arrays around the world....You gotta use common sense and demand a little evidence at some point.

So there are things like the "Omaha HAARP facility", which many think is in place because of a youtube vid showing a few radio towers with a cornfield under them. They are actually HF or shortwave antennae used by the air force, and are 25 miles from Omaha.

After I combined the info from official sites and the few believable independent sites, it was not too hard to form an accurate, logical picture of the real situation. Which is this:

There is a four-plex facility (see graphic below) in Alaska. There is another array in Puerto Rico via the Arecibo dish. A consortium of five European nations runs another array called EISCAT in Norway. There is another one (Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility) in Russia near Moscow. There is a network of 34 radars (called SuperDARN) across the globe that keep track of the ionosphere, which may or may not feed info to any one or more of these heating arrays.

So, the USA, Norway as host for Western Europe , and Russia have these facilities. That seems to be it. So much for the mega-dot maps.

5/3/14

So I have been watching the world news
lately on television. I also happen to read the world news on the
internet, directly from several foreign news sites. While the
American t.v. news seems thorough and detailed, all narrated
matter-of-factly by the dapper newsmen, it is striking what is simply
never mentioned: the other side of the stories.

According to American news, this is
what is happening in a country called Ukraine:...Its citizens ousted
its corrupt leader, and then the Russians tried to undermine its new
democracy with clandestinely funded insurgents. It then agreed to a
peace accord which it is not following. Therefore the US and
Europeans are showing the Russians they can't just take over other
countries and get away with it, so sanctions were invoked. Meanwhile,
Russia took over another country called Crimea and annexed it
illegally. Their unlawful expansions are being dealt with by the
brave Americans and Europeans.

But the rest of the world knows this
side of it:...Ukraine's leader lived no more opulently than any
other head of state, and he was ousted by a known fascist party
extremist with CIA backing. The new puppet regime with extensive fascistroots, received a day long visit from the head of
the CIA, which was publicly admitted to by the American government.
Since then, the new regime has stopped payments on money owed to
Russia for natural gas deliveries (3.5 billion), actually cut off the
water supply to Crimea, and stopped supplying its own troops (i.e.:
no food for days at a time). They also invited American mercenaries
in for unknown missions. Now, they are attacking Russian citizens
with military helicopters in the city of Slaviansk. Meanwhile,
Crimea, a former Soviet state, VOTED to rejoin with Russia and was
annexed by internationally legal means. So now Russia's pleas for
peace and warnings to not harm Russians in Ukraine are ignored.

light blue areas are ethnic Russians. they are oppressed minority in danger of genocidal acts.

America, and its European proxy army
NATO, have placed troops in 4 countries directly bordering Russia (..Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland..).
They also have placed naval flotillas in the Black and Baltic seas,
on which they are practicing military exercises. NATO has officially
declared Russia to be an enemy. Germany's leader Merkel has hinted at wanting a land war
with Russia, releasing the statement recently,
“Nobody should be deceived. We are willing to act.” Apparently their 'act' is to shoot down airliners and blame it on Russia- see list hereof numerous non-Western articles on this.

So the question few are even asking is: can America even
win a war with Russia? Even with NATO backing?? Let's think about
that...

The Americans can win any war, through
air superiority and high tech gadgets, plus worldwide presence.
Right? They walked into Iraq and stomped them, right? Iraq's
French made antiaircraft guns were fitted with targeting microchips that were hacked and defeated with American HARM missiles, so guess
why the American invasion went so well? After ten years of
enforcement of a no-fly zone and random bombings before this, how strong were
they anyway? And this is the example of their power?..Regardless, how
high tech are American weapons, compared to other countries,
especially Russia? Who has more military might?

Russia has virtually all of its military in its
homeland territory: Russia. The Americans are dispersed across the
globe in bases all over the world. So the comparative totals of how
many troops or jets or whatever becomes pointless. How many of those
troops or tanks can America deliver onto Russian territory, without
sacrificing the security of the bases they originated from? While
tanks from Ft. Knox could be safely airlifted to Russia in the event
of war, would they really want to move the tanks out of South Korea?
Or if the equipment or men in Europe were moved on Russia, the
French, German, and UK militaries would protect the landmass from
invasion, right? If so- it is a distraction to keep them out of the
conflict. If not, they would be tied up with NATO maneuvers and leave
their home soil wide open. Either way, Europe is screwed. War in
Eurasia will go very badly for the NATO puppets.

Can America take on such a large nation
with so many frontiers at once? Russia is the largest country in the
world. While their main enemy may be highly mobile and attempt to divide and conquer with numerous small fronts, their enormous landmass
only aids their breathing room in event of war.

They are used to war and hardship,
having suffered far greater than all other allies combined during
world war two. If it were not for the Russians, we would probably be
living under a nazi flag right now. They fought hard for their homeland
before, and would again. Anyone fights harder to protect his home
than anywhere else. Will they really just give up like the Iraqi army
did? Doubtful. Here is what no Americans understand: they are not
afraid of us, we do not intimidate them, and our 'hegemony' is a joke
to them. They are also tired of us encircling their country with
military bases.

So what would happen if America or its
pet NATO were to try and invade them?

First of all, the Russian military is
very serious and does not mess around. Unlike several movies, they
are not a bunch of bumbling morons with junk weaponry. They are known
to be very well trained and disciplined and have very advanced
weapons. They also will be fighting for their homeland- not off playing soldier on
some imperialistic jaunt on the other side of the world.

What kind of damage could they do to
American technology and firepower though? Many of their systems are
considered to be at least as advanced, if not much more so, than
their American counterparts. Examples:

A Topol is a nuclear missile mounted
onto a giant truck. It drives around in the Siberian woods at random,
so Americans are unable to target its location. As good as submarine
based nukes, and they have them- we don't! All of our land
based nukes are in silos...While scattered over large areas, their locations are known and the Russians have more than enough warheads to cover them all many times over.

Regarding the nukes, they have more. At least 300
more. And they also have extensive civil defense shelters. America
stopped maintaining their shelters after protests in 1961. The govt. did not want to pay for it anyway- even though the scientific
studies show you could survive a nuclear war if prepared properly.
Funny how Russia and China have extensive plans/shelters in place,
and America has nothing at all. What this means to us is that they
know they can survive a nuclear war and while dreading it, fear it
less than we do. They know that most of them will survive. Couple
that with the fact that Russians would never give up and submit to
American invaders, a conventional defeat would trigger the nuclear
menace as an obvious next step for them to cut the head off the snake
of the imperialists.

What if they joined forces with another
country, instead of, or before resorting to, nukes? While they are
not military allies with China, they have common interests and a
common foe. China knows full well that America is encircling them too
with the so-called “pivot to Asia” policy. If Russia were
crippled, they would surely be next, and they would want to prevent
that. Russia and China are both part of an economic alliance with increasing military ties called
the Shanghai Cooperative Organization, which includes them and four
other Asian countries as members, six observer states, six dialogue partners, plus two groups of countries as observers. India and Iran are expected to become full members soon. Would this group morph into a true military
alliance if America starts invading Asian nations? This blogger
posits that it is very likely the SCO will become NATO's counterbalance.

A military alliance between the Russians and Chinese
would spell doom for American forces. While either of them could in
theory win a war with us, both together almost surely would. America fought two fronts before, such as in WWII, in the Pacific and in
Europe, and this time we have NATO and ANZUS and the Philippines and
Japan....But this time nukes are a big factor, and extensive sea
mining, and enormous armies. Tactical nukes, long range weaponry, and
stealth jets and boats are all in the mix this time.

Contrary to popular belief, Americans
have no monopoly on stealth technology. Russians and the Chinese have this
as well. The Chinese are especially keen on the stealth boats, and
are developing stealth choppers. Russia is making stealth fighter
jets and bombers. Iran and India also claim to have stealth jets.

What if a war did occur, what could the
Russians do- besides run from us as Americans predict? They have
several strengths and a few weaknesses:

-their army is very well trained,
loyal, and will have no trouble gaining virtually all possible
conscripts if war began.

-their country is large and hard to
patrol all borders. There are too many invasion points to prepare
for.

-their navy has only one aircraft
carrier so projecting their power is not easy.

-already surrounded by American bases
and sea flotillas, they would have many fronts in all directions.

Let us compare a few things directly as
well:

America has more (than Russia)-
current troops and total population; aircraft, helicopters, airports,
major ports, aircraft carriers, subs, frigates, and destroyers; and
less coastlines and shared borders to cover.

Worthy of special mention here are aircraft carriers. Used to project American imperialism worldwide, they intimidate the smaller countries as they rove the high seas. Russia and China each has only one apiece currently, though both are building more. This means they cannot as easily project their power to other places and their wars will have to be fought at home, on their turf. Unfortunately for the West, defenses have been constructed against them. The Chinese have a ballistic anti-ship missile called the DF-21D. It can drop straight down onto a carrier from space up to 1200 miles away. The Russians have the Onyx 'Sunburn' anti-ship missile, which is so low flying and fast its sheer kinetic energy can literally capsize a large vessel. Three can sink a carrier. They also have a lot of 130mm coastal artillery guns.

A few other factors to consider are not
just numbers, but how the battles would be fought...
An American
flotilla with its aircraft carrier is very formidable, but so is a
Sunburn missile.

High tech ranging devices and other
gadgets are pretty handy, but not when you are inside a wall of fire.

The UK and France are powerful friends,
but not so much when China and Iran has the enemy's back.
Many vaunted weapons systems of America are really not so great. Prime example is the M1 Abrams tank. Weighing 20 tons more than the Russian T90, it has 125 km less range, much slower reload time, and 1/2 to 1/4 the firing range, depending on types of shells used. Besides the fact that the Houthi rebels are using 1970s Soviet shoulder fired ATGM missiles to destroy Saudi operated M1 tanks- see this video...Other examples abound but are beyond the scope of this piece.

They have been preparing for war with
us for decades. Do you really think they are going to roll over and
beg for mercy while we blast their infrastructure to bits and kill
thousands of their civilians? Just because Iraq did, it doesn't mean
the Russians will. Encircling and threatening them is playing with
fire, to put it mildly.

One thing Americans very rarely do is
empathize: putting themselves in someone else's shoes. Their
imperialistic adventures and corporate oil grabs are just a game to
them. They haven't experienced war at home and think it is just a
news clip that need not be worried about. So let us turn the tables to
make people understand a little better. Here is an accurate analogy
of what we are doing to them:

The United States of America has a
federal govt. breakdown. It reorganizes as a new country, called the
Commonwealth of Independent States. Then after a time becomes simply
the American Federation with several states choosing to become their
own nations. All is well with these states at first, but then Russia
decides to use CIA style regime change tactics in say, our new
country-former-state of Georgia. The new government has disagreements
with the people of say, Savannah. So the Atlantans threaten them. The
UN sets up observers to watch. Sure enough, Atlanta attacks Savannah
and starts killing hundreds of its civilians despite UN orders. So
the American Federation invades just long enough to save the
Savannans, then withdraws. During this incident they find entire
warehouses full of Russian weapons stockpiled. So the Russians were
setting up a base on our border. Hmmm. Now, four years later, the
nation-former-state of say, New York has a similar political upset
and the KGB is all over it. There are also Cuban mercenaries sneaking
around. We plead for peace but the new Communist govt. of New York is
killing civilians in Albany with helicopter gunships. The UN orders
peace terms, and no one follows them. Next, Russia sends a military
flotilla up the Hudson River and has live fire naval exercises in the
Great Lakes. They also anchor their aircraft carrier off Staten
Island. Apparently, something is up. Especially since they have
placed troops in five Caribbean nations and have declared us to be an
enemy. What would Americans think, who would they blame; what would
they do? New York is a very strategic place to put a base near DC,
after all. We aren't stupid, right?

And do you think Russians are stupid???

Couldn't America just fly in and bomb away like they do everywhere else?

Addendum: is the US Air Force unmatched- or outmatched?

Trying to compare
Russian and American military jets is tricky to put it mildly. There are
so many specs and uses for each jet. Should one compare size, shape,
“generation”, role/s, ranges, types of armaments it carries- or what
combinations of these??

America has many more aircraft– in sheer
numbers- than Russia. But then Russia does not need to stock 128 foreign
bases and 12 aircraft carriers like America does. Where are they, and at
what times; how soon can they be transported to the Eurasian theater
(where any war with Russia would occur)? Also, how many are used at
domestic bases, parked in North America and out of range of Eurasia?
Counting off all of these plus the where-are-they-now factor for the
carrier based ones and the how-far-away-are-they-without-refueling
factor of the ones at foreign bases, I suspect not too many will be able
to approach Russia at the outbreak of any hostilities, and more would
arrive sporadically. So tallying means little in reality.

America
has three long range bombers. There is the old but trusty B52,
scheduled to be used until 2045. Then there is the B1 variable swept
wing, and the B2 stealth bomber.

They
also have the F22 fighter- an advanced jet that is no longer in
production though still in use, the F18 E/F fighter, and several jets
which will in time be replaced by the new F35 multirole jet. These
include: the A10 ground attack, AC130 gunship, AV8 VSTOL
attack(Harrier), and the F15/F16/F18 fighters. The F35 has a marine
version with a VTOL horizontal turbofan (the fans are from the failed Avrocar of the 50s).

The
F35 is considered to be a lemon and a boondoggle. It would be wiser to
keep the A10 and F16 in foreign bases/carriers, put all of the F18s and
F15s on domestic bases, and discontinue the AC130. Then use the AV8 for
the marines.

{ The A10 is perfect for land bases to be available at any
front lines. The F16 is small and fits on carriers better than the bulky
old F15s, and would serve fine in those duties. The F18, very small and
nimble would be ideal for domestic borders, while the F15 would be fine
as a backbone craft to defend the home front if invaded. The AC130s are
cargo planes with weaponry attached: monstrosities. Useless when A10s
are available. The Harriers are fine for use on the marine landing
crafts- which are basically small aircraft carriers. Reshuffling these jets to smarter uses
in an organized way like this would make more sense and save a fortune
by not having to buy the F35 junkers. }

As far as attack choppers, America has 3: the AH6, AH64, and AH1. The 64 is the Apache. The other two are smaller.

The
Russians also have three bombers: the Tu22- similar to the discontinued
F111, the Tu95- a massive turboprop similar to the B52 but larger, and
the Tu160, which is similar to the B1 but much larger; also a variable
swept wing craft.

They
also have the MiG39 interceptor/fighter, the Su33 naval fighter
(designed for their carriers), the Su27 fighter, and the multirole
fighters Mig29, Su30, and Su35. They also have three strike specific
jets- the Su34, the Su25 (also for close air support), and the Su24
(also for recon, and with a naval version). They are developing now a
multirole fighter called the PAK-FA or T-50.

All
Russian strike and fighter jets -except the Su24 and Su25- are
supermaneuverable. This means they are capable of amazing maneuvers,
controlled stalls, and sudden changes in direction and orientation.
(Only one American jet can do this to some degree- the F22).

They
have only two types of attack choppers- the Ka-50 and the Ka-52. They
have double-stacked top rotors and no tail rotors, which makes them very
maneuverable, quiet, and fast.

Overall,
if you look up the specs (ranges, firepower, speeds, etc.) it is very
clear the Russians have superior air power. Maybe not in sheer numbers
of craft, but as far as qualities, capabilities, and ranges- absolutely.
Please do look up on Youtube or other sites' videos of both sides'
maneuvers and it will be clear.

Moreover, the
same can be said for their tanks, subs, missiles, air defense systems,
and coastal defenses. They are very significantly advanced in air
defense, specialized equipment and weaponry, electronic warfare, special
forces organization and training, and arctic climate warfare. Their
navy is smaller but is a green water navy- not blue water as America's
is- and has more icebreakers, subs, and minelayers. They also have much
more experience in actual battle in urban and mountain terrains, from
Chechnya, Georgia, and Afghanistan (as opposed to Americans mainly doing
air bombings). The Russian armed forces also partake in frequent,
massive live fire drills of 100,000 troops or more- in rotating
districts, sometimes with China or other nations joining in. America has
no exercises on this scale.

This should open the eyes of a few at least, who believe baseless lies
repeated by the MSM to make them think America could ever successfully
invade Russia. The whole idea is impossible, suicidal, unnecessary, and
insane. While America and its toy soldiers from their vassal states
(NATO) encircle both Russia and China with bases, insurmountable
defenses are already waiting that will simply destroy the modern
American (Roman) Empire.

Note: the news in the US is extremely biased and lacking. NBC is the worst, next to fox of course which isn't real news anyway. What they do not say is the most telling.
Please seek out-of-country info for all subjects and current events! You will be amazed at what was simply not being mentioned before.

{map: blackseagrain.net}
sorry map is inaccurate. just an overview of area for now.

2/7/14

Several methods of measuring it have been
devised, though few are all-encompassing of the human mind's capabilities. We
all like to think we are "smart" to some degree or another. How
people base this assumption is varied. Many base it upon the grades they got or
get in school. Since most people go to public schools, this is highly
inaccurate. While teachers attempt to educate us with information about their
assigned subjects, the fact is that public schools are a complete and utter
joke. Attendance, bullying, detentions, favoritism, home life, money for
tutoring, and numerous other factors contribute greatly to the grades a public
school student receives. Kids of wealthier families can afford all the fees
associated with band, sports, and clubs, and hence have more chances to learn
as well as receive preferential treatment by the teachers. Kids who can't
afford the current fad of clothes are picked on more, have trouble
concentrating, and do worse on tests. Similar anecdotes abound.

Once the kids are college age, they may enter
that path if they are even told of the ACT and SAT tests beforehand, (I was
not), and then once enrolled take remedial courses for what they didn't learn
in high school. After years of general courses and partying, they cram all they
can into their heads about their chosen specialty. Most degrees are generalized
and the students expect all these vague office careers out of them. The
percentage of college graduates that get jobs from their degrees is laughably
low. Not to mention the yoke of student loans. So much for 'higher
learning'.

While book smarts are an important factor in
intelligence, it is certainly not the only thing that creates it. Knowing the
facts in books is a good base of information to draw from, but how we utilize that
trivia is even more important. Scientists are notoriously closed-minded and
will vehemently argue against any new info they hear of. Teachers aren't nearly
as bad, so would you trust a mathematics professor to do your taxes? Probably,
but would you trust him to spay your cat?? You must know alot of information to
work as a computer programmer. You also need to know a lot of info to weld
properly, or to process credit cards at a store, or to run plumbing lines
effectively. All types of knowledge may vary but their commonality is that they
all must be learned in depth for our assigned societal tasks to be completed
successfully. So learning is required to be successful, but who is to say that
the drive through girl is any less intelligent than a mechanic or a science
teacher? Figuring out what you need to know and utilizing it is all-important.

Applying information is key to so many things.
Learning all about the funeral practices of the Golden Horde may be
fascinating, but it applies very little- if at all- in the modern world. No
matter how book smart someone is, they are not necessarily smart people
overall- just trivia hogs. The contestants on Jeopardy are not only good
examples, but also are very similar in flavor to college professors- spouting
factoids on all manner of subjects- most of which no one needs to know about
for any reason- while knowing a lot about one or two subjects, the facts of
which are important only in their field and not to the general populace in
everyday life. A contestant today who was winning is an actuary with a
mathematics degree. On the final question, he answered "50 Shades",
betting 401 dollars on it. The correct answer was "Silent Spring". He
clearly had to know his answer was wrong, as it asked about a non-fiction book
from 1962. So why did he bet any money on his joke-answer, much less enough
money to make him lose the game?? Answer: What is "no common
sense"?...

Common sense is something many bookworms just do
not have. The much-espoused logic that teachers claim to admire is usually
lacking in their everyday thoughts. Logic permeates common-sense, which
encapsulates so-called street-smarts.

More important yet is what I call awareness.
Awareness is the all-encompassing logic backed by common sense and underwritten
with the book smarts. It is what ties it all together. Many people feel that
they have this ability but actually do not. Good examples are the conspiracy
theorists. While some conspiracies are true and provable, or at least highly
plausible with some significant evidence, most are utter nonsense. They rely
upon rumors and circular logic combined with myths and flawed science to
"prove" their claims. Then the spouting off of the complex yet
hair-brained scenarios is repeated over and over again, until it becomes fact
in the minds of the weak. Reading these claims may make you open-minded, which
is good, but believing them hook, line, and sinker with no attempt to verify
them is just stupidity. It is the farthest thing from intelligence, much less
awareness in itself.

What is the difference then? What is true
awareness; aware of what exactly? I know someone who believes everything
he reads and rattles on about conspiracy theories incessantly- kinda like Mel
Gibson's character did in the beginning of the movie called Conspiracy Theory.
He says the internet is not real- it is a US Govt. falsification. But then he
gets much of his info from websites. He says the news is not real, it is a
fabrication of the govt. censors- every story, every bit of footage. And he
knows it because, um, well he's just sure of it that's why. So while he thinks
he is so extremely smart and self-aware that he is privy to some presumed
'special knowledge' the "sheeple" do not realize, he also has no
evidence whatsoever for his claims and his sources are no more than rumors from
outlets he says are lying anyway. Get the fruit loop yet? And these are the
majority of the supposed aware people--conspiracy theorists and paranoid mental
cases that feed into their malarkey. Awareness is not just proclaiming your
views are right, but knowing on a much deeper level that you are aware of all
possibilities and that your views have been filtered through the tests of
open-mindedness and all other opinions. This makes you aware of the bottom line
on the subjects you ponder, making you privy to numerous alternative
viewpoints- some of which turn out to have merit.

Once you trust a source to fill out all sides of
a subject, blindly believing its pronouncements is still not wise. Every
article should be believable in itself, for its own reasons. Just because a
certain site or writer says something, it shouldn't mean to you that its words
are automatically true. A lot of bloggers and other web authors depend upon
this to build and maintain a following. Knowing this, they tend to write what
their target audience wants to hear. Right wing sites spout off scary stories
about commie troop movements; left wing ones chide bush and his foibles. The
fans lap it up and everyone's happy, except the free thinkers that is. People
that think for themselves, instead of letting others tell them what or how to
think, are free thinkers. And these are generally not the ones that lap up
political scrawlings day in and day out. Indeed, most people who consider
themselves to be intelligent and making up their own minds are actually
entirely the opposite. They already have their minds made up, and utilize the
sites or other media they know will back up their predetermined ideals. Then
any new ideas that the media spouts off become their beliefs as well.
Simultaneously, they dismiss out of hand anything the other side says, and use
that dismissive attitude to hold up as an example of how they think they are
deciding something and 'wisely' poo-poohing the alleged idiocy of them morons.

Them and they are vague concepts of whomever the bad guy is, and is one
of the most common terms that conspiracists use. It is a catch-all term that
means 'the scapegoat of the day'. Usually the government, frequently the left
wing; always the other side. Being smarter, wiser, and better informed than the
vague they/them ghosts is not very challenging, and makes the short sighted
feel more powerful. Asking a conspiracist to define or name 'them' generally
gets an answer of stammering, or at times a list of evildoers will be rattled
off. How those tie in can lead to a fruit-loop lecture of great duration. Then
blind belief is exposed quite clearly.

At the other end of the spectrum is creativity.
Creative people think up ideas on their own and create ways to solve problems.
Have you ever just sat there for an hour or so, and planned in your mind how to
fabricate a new tool or car part, and then thrown in a wild card such as without
welding apparatus? Or have you figured out how to convert a car into a
camper lately? Or better yet, questioned precepts of science and thought up
alternative possibilities? These are the brain-games of the creative folk.
Finding unique solutions to life's dilemmas is creative. Most people are awed
when such an idea is suggested; many reject it though. If they would tune in to
a motivational show on their televisions once in a while, they may learn to
stop rejecting new ideas.

Self-help people sometimes speak of a condition
labeled "self-actualized". A self-actualized person has self acceptance
and a democratic worldview; they maintain a realistic outlook; are
problem-centered, as in trying to solve all things at their root causes; they
maintain 'peak experiences', essentially living in the moment at all times;
maintain autonomy from others, having their own unique views of what happiness
and contentment are; maintain times of solitude and privacy more than others,
which they enjoy; have a philosophical outlook and sense of humor; and lastly
act spontaneously in all things. While these are all common traits of the
intelligent, they together can be labeled as "self-actualization"
but do not encompass all things attached to higher thinking.

Intelligence is a combination of all of these
factors. Having just one or two is compartmentalized intelligence. Possessing
all of these qualities to some degree or another makes for a smooth path to
awareness, and true intelligence. Sure, some scientists and professors are
truly intelligent, but most are far from it. And a few conspiracies have merit,
but most do not. Every person needs to evaluate their own thought processes and
determine if they are compartmentalized or not and to what degree.

To summarize, true intelligence requires all of
the following at once from a person:

-common sense- includes logic and 'street
smarts';

-book smarts and general knowledge;

-self-actualization;

-awareness and free thinking;

-creativity and being innovative;

-ability to learn, and the application of book
smarts and logic.

No matter how little the public schools taught
you, anyone can work on these factors and greatly increase their intelligence
for a better day to day life.

1/10/14

FREE real sites you can use, how they rate, and how to pick up the ladies on them...
I find it a little sad to see guides for sale offering online dating tips. Do people really need to pay for this information? Someone with a lot of experience should just spill it and declassify all of the supposed secrets of how to 'get some' from online searches. There are obviously a lot more single men than women, and obviously, women have a much easier time than men at finding sex online or otherwise. There seems to be a throng of men looking for it and the women can be as picky as they want. How do you get on top of the crowd and be the chosen one when a hot gal wants a date?? This blogger has done it many times, and I am going to tell you how...free of charge no less. (And don't get me wrong, gals, I am genuinely looking for the right long term partner, or at least any real gf I can start again with. The info below is what I have learned along the way, posted here for others to learn from...)

First, get a friend to take flattering pics of you. If you are obese, do not use head shots only- women are on to this trick. You are better off making it known that you are obese to start with. Do you really want to go through a lot to get a gal to meet you, then have her see how big you are? She will almost surely not put out, bud. I know one woman who experienced this. He traveled six hours to see her, and was huge. She said he could stay overnight before driving back, but could not touch her. He asked why not and she said "you didn't tell me you were a hippo!". Do you want this to happen to you?? If you are big, do not hide it. A lot of women are too, and they accept it. So if you meet up, she will know and expect you to be whatever you are. This works both ways, of course: be very leery of gals with only face pics.

Second, write the truth on profiles- to an extent. I am not telling you to lie, but will tell you this: if you admit any of the following a gal will not meet you: you do not have a job or a car, you are on parole or probation, you use drugs, etc. Be logical when filling in the blanks.

Third, learn to write and spell. Virtually every woman I've met and/or written to from dating sites has told me the same thing: they all get swamped with hundreds upon hundreds of messages, the vast majority of which are from guys who can barely write a coherent sentence. They all ask crudely for sex or nude pics. So if you can write a decent paragraph, you will be noticed right away. Then avoid mentioning sex or nudity and you'll be very interesting to them. Further, if you say you have a job, a car, and your own place to live; and, that you do not use drugs and are not a parolee, then you will do very well indeed. Aside from that, talk to them about your hobbies and interests, and what you like to do on a date. Tell them why you are alone and seeking a long term partner (whether true or not...). Then ask them to consider replying. They will.

Fourth, use the sites that work. Free sites are best of course. The only free dating sites I have ever found are : meetme, plentyoffish or POF, mingle2 (fka mingles), fetlife, and datehookup or DHU. I have seen articles about these sites "investigating" their reality. Let me assure you, they are all real, and I have met numerous, real people from each of them and had sex resulting from these meetings with actual women, from four of the five sites listed. And all for free.

Pay sites are not so good. First, you have to pay them about 20 a month. Then, you may or may not get something for it. The most well known pay site is AFF, or adult friend finder, and its numerous spinoff sites and fake blogs which are just disguised ads for them (about any dating site with the term 'finder' or 'friend' in it is likely affiliated with them. They also run the info-mining site alt dot com.). They charge for anything you do on there- even sending a 'wink'. But they are very large, and if you are willing to pay, it could be worth it. I have also met real people in person off of this site. However, watch for their 'auto-renew' thing regarding your credit card info. Most pay sites are similar to this, and you pay for any communication whatsoever with other members.

Fifth, seek dates locally. There are single women everywhere. You do not need to seek out women an hour's drive away when they are in your neighborhood. If you live in a small town, start locally and slowly spread your net. Look for women in the next nearest town, your county, and so on until you hit the nearest metro area. If you have to search beyond that, you are definitely doing something wrong.

By the same token, other sites to avoid, including pay sites, are any mentioning foreign brides or Russians. Filipinos, Russians, and others are not using the net to see American men. And you do not need to send them money for a plane ticket to come see you...If you are that ignorant then offer to go see them...see what they say. Russia is a very big and populous nation, and the Philippines is full of very strict Catholics who will not have sex before marriage. And you are about to send them money why- because they are too desperate to find a guy where they live? Give me a break! Trust me--there are plenty of single, lonely, American women to choose from!!! For free even.

Russian women are just bad news. Yes, there are lots of beautiful Russian women that are single. But the Russian men are already there, guys- so why would they want you? Russian women are just white women, usually, that are no different than single white women in Poland or England. So why pursue them specifically? It makes no sense. Especially if you are American and living here in America with the thousands if not millions of single women around to pursue. Despite what the movies portray, Russians are not obsessed with America nor do they all know English. To avoid all the scamming, just stick to local gals.

One 'Russian' gal I was writing once sent me pics that were clearly professionally taken. 'She' also sent me a poem I found on other Russian scammer sites. Then she said it was a sunny day. I looked up weather in her supposed town and found it was cold and rainy...INVESTIGATE all things foreign!!! Better yet, just forget them altogether: foreigners do not know you, need you, nor want you...and you should never ever need to send them moolah for any reason whatsoever! If they were real and wanted to see you that badly, they'd come to you or better yet tell you where to meet them in their town, instead of begging you for 'plane fare'. Anything involving Nigeria, Africa in general, or any foreign country is a scam! Just do not!

So what do you want to look for in an online profile? I have noticed a lot of gals post that they like "hunting, fishing, camping, mudding" etc...Ya I bet! They just want to impress guys is all. Which means they are desperate. So message them. If a gal has no profile pic, she is doing one of three things: she is attached and cheating, trying to stay incognito; she is a slut that is on there to ask for sex only and breaking the site's rules most likely; or, she is afraid people will think she is fat/ugly and wants to talk to guys first to woo them a little before revealing her appearance. Any of these three are gold. Profiles without pics are therefore to be sought out. If they say they are seeking long term relationships only, do not let that scare you away. Many use that status to deter the morons that fill their inboxes with lewd requests. Even the ones that mean it are still horny women that will get close to a good guy quickly. Don't want long-term? If you want to get laid- keep that a secret! Always claim to want long term unless she says otherwise first. The ones that claim to want 'casual dating' or 'no commitment' actually are looking for the right guy they can keep. So let them try you out as a possible candidate: most likely you'll get a good time out of it; maybe you'll click with her...

Most women that are 30ish or more have kids and make sure you know it. They like to say "they are my world" so as to warn you that the kids come first before any boyfriends. This announcement is belabored logorrheically on all dating sites. A similar scenario exists with occasional gals who proclaim that family is very important to them. This really means that they would rather hang out at family barbecues and spend all their holidays with their distant cousins than be with their boyfriend/date. Beware these women. They usually have secret crushes on their cousins and other 'relatives' by marriage, step-, or foster- whatevers. It is precisely these type of women that allow their relatives to meddle in their relationships, which of course dooms them. Trust me: just don't.

Aside from these guidelines, explore. You never know what may await you. One profile I accidentally clicked on as 'want to meet' had an unflattering profile pic and a generic 'just ask me any questions you have' type of description. She turned out to be a very kinky nympho and made an excellent new year's eve date. Another one, on the now-defunct Yahoo Personals, had no profile pic and checked that she was 'a few extra pounds'. I thought, oh boy...But once I met her she was very pretty and quite slim. Never forget: all women think they are fat- even the anorexic ones! She also turned out well as a wonderful fling partner.

The ones that end up being just too ugly or morbidly obese, or what-have-you, are easy enough to ditch if you prepare properly. Meet them in a public place the first time, such as a store or mall. Then they are at ease and not worried about serial killers etc., and you get to bow out if needed by saying you'll call them when you have more time. Actually, they can and will do the same to you from time to time. But it's not a big deal- start messaging the next one or three.

The reality is that most people do not have much free time these days and have little to do outside of work. They wish they had all these hobbies, but really do not have time. So whatever your claimed hobbies or interests are, become theirs. Women are lonely, and will be glad to fish or whatever if it means getting what they really want from a man.

What do women really want then? They want snuggling more than anything, so assure them they will be held and snuggled during scary movies and other times. They also want security and stability, instead of a mooch that would live off of them. They want self-sufficient hunks who will lay them nightly and make them feel special somehow. They want guys who can write and drive and stay out of jail. They just want a partner to help deal with life. Present yourself that way and you will get some, for sure.

A few footnotes about the sites mentioned: MeetMe used to be excellent, and this blogger has met several women with it. Also doubled as a chat page. BUT they are the only site I've ever come across that actually uses the permission to 'modify/delete SD card contents'. Do not use their app; just make a shortcut to their site unless you want video ads placed onto your SD card weekly. Their tampering with mine scared me so I removed the app and do not recommend it. It also has lately become a thicket of fake profiles- fake meaning clickbait non-real profiles which mine people for contact info and pics to use for ads and spamming of the porn sites they emanate from. You can usually tell these by them being very new profiles; with zero, one, or very few pics; no live feed; and ongoing suggestive statuses. Between them and the ever increasing use of the pages as classifieds for potheads wanting to buy and sell their dope, I left the site. Tried it again later on, and found they had redesigned their site. It is now usable but goes overboard with noticications.

They also run. A pointless spinoff site called skout. It is useless.

PlentyofFish is also very good and makes it easy to find/meet people. You can select what you are seeking, such as dating, marriage, or intimate encounter. You can also filter out people that seek marriage for example, as well as people who list that they use drugs, etc. It works well for the picky ones. Finding people who actually put intimate encounter status works great if you seek sluts. I have also had good luck with this site, and their app is fine. If you consider how many gals stood me up and/or ditched me on dates from this site though, it's a little telling. Maybe POF girls are all skittish?? But- if you ever want to quit the site and delete your profile, you will have to pay them money! You must "upgrade" to do that. Therefore your only option to leave the site freely is to delete your pics and change your profile info accordingly. You cannot leave the fields blank, nor post a few short words. You must write a few sentences per field. On mine I ended up putting a string of random letters until it was long enough for them. DateHookup used to be very good as well. Their app works well and they make it easy to search for nearby people. It seems to be a little lesser known but still has lots of members. When you use the 'want to meet' feature on there, you will find that most people do not actually want to make the effort to meet. You are better off just writing to the ones you like. One gal I met on this site drove 100 miles to meet me at a McDonald's. We talked, she seemed to think I was weird, we parted ways. I never heard from her again- and I skipped a Coal Chamber concert for her! So it goes sometimes...However I've met several other great women from here, including one that introduced her whole group of friends to me. Unfortunately, recently scammers have been overtaking the site with fake profiles. Look out for beautiful women with only one picture, who do not accept winks, live 800 to 1,000 miles from you, and seek men 18-82 or so. These are fake and becoming ubiquitous on there. Most importantly is the fact that every time you get onto the site, you are required to reset your password through your email. I complained about this bug for 2 years. They said they were working on it, but never fixed it. Mingle2, while free and functional, just never got me anything from anyone. It could work, but also does have more than its share of Russian phonies on it. The only messages I've ever received on there were from profiles in Asian countries. They constantly want you to pay to see who 'wants to meet you'...It's worth a try, though trying the others first will likely work out for you anyway. I quit the site eventually.Fetlife is also free and is facebook-style in organization. Though it is
supposed to be for all fetish lovers, many fetishes are not listed or
mentioned at all. (It is mainly, though not entirely, folks of the BDSM crowd. It also is seemingly overrun with women wanting to peg
men. If you do not know what pegging is, then you don't want to know.)
They also have large groups like chatrooms, which in several instances were exceedingly rude
to me. Still worth a try- many, many locations, groups, and members are on it.

Philanderers.com is frequently mentioned in articles on the net as some kind of paragon of websites for cheaters. Actually though, it does not exist anymore. Other well known sites, such as AFF, cheaters.com, match.com, lavalife, cupid, and zoosk- all are pay only sites. Sure you can join for free and on some sites even send a wink, but communication with another member will require cash. Singles/dating pages and groups on Facebook are all useless. I have met one person on one once, which did not end well. Most of the groups are run by foreigners that barely know English, and allow lots of spammers on the page. Then a lot of desperate guys try to talk to the fake girls, and that is the sum of their activity. Some pages are more populated with real people, though they are hard to find and every one invariably is dominated by a few obsessive posters and/or megalomaniacal moderators on power trips. I have been lambasted many times in different groups, including by the mods, for ridiculous things. If you can get a word in edgewise, you will be talking to people across the country or world anyway almost always. Such a waste of time...

As far as using the personals sections on Craigslist, I do not recommend it. This is an area that this blogger has a lot of experience in. It will become a separate post later, but in general, 90% of the ads on there are posted by scamming/spamming sex sites, and 9% are just gay men trying to talk straight guys into first-time blowjobs. The remaining 1% are real women seeking men. How to spot them is another post. Basically, it's a huge waste of time that will fill your mailbox with spam for years. I have only met one person off of Craigslist, ever, and that is an amazing feat.

Occasional searches over the years for other truly free sites have been fruitless. If anyone knows of any, please inform me. By free I mean no fee to pay for anything at all, and ability to contact other members, view their profiles, and write what you want to them without deletion or cost.

переведите translate

APPONO ASTOS

Wisdom is All

Appono Astos- meaning

Since a constant stream of people seem to be searching for this term and its meaning, I am posting it here now.

In England once, some crop circle researchers pressed a message into a hillside for the circle makers to read:"Talk to Us".The next morning a reply was found on the opposite hill- lettering which was found to be genuine and not man made.(true crop formations are bent on a cellular level, unbroken, magnetized, containing rare elements, have soil anomalies, interfere with electronics, and are usually bent in opposing or interwoven patterns. man-made ones are simply bent and break many stems, and have no special properties.)The reply was difficult to translate as it turned out to be an obscure dialect of Latin (Post Augustan-) that was written in an old Knights Templar code. It translated to Appono Astos, which meansWe oppose cunning and deceit. This means the true circle makers were tired of the circle hoaxes and the govt. suppression of info on the real ones. The British Army was proven to have been deeply involved in hoaxing circles and burning real ones on many occasions.

All deceit should be opposed, especially by cunning govt.s and their pawns. Truth is all.

IN THE WORKS

Articles being worked on, to be posted in due time:

- Maps of Russian and american domestic bases

- Relativity, quantum, and string theories: new insights

- Imperialism reexamined

-suggestions welcomed for any other topics; use message box below

Email Us: suggestions appreciated

Name

Email
*

Message
*

Brexit thoughts...

Seems awesome that a public referendum can decide a country's future! It not only worked, but the P.M. quit to boot. Although I knew that all ballots in the UK are paper- none electronic- I was leery of some kind of vote tampering, perhaps because it is so prevalent in america. Now that brexit has succeeded, ulterior motives are seeping out that makes one wonder if it was indeed rigged. Funny how the success could result in harming trade with Russia and more influence in NATO by the UK and america, which means even more hawkishness. How deliciously convenient for the usa.

Now the Netherlands, Spain, Greece, and others are considering similar referendums. The Scots are wanting to secede from the UK again too. And many feel that Ireland will rejoin with its north counties.

Long term, this will make it more difficult for america to control Europe as individual countries than it had when they were one super-state. Therefore it is all good. Go for it Europe- run your own countries again.

But this site endorses all of the above as interesting and worth a look! Definition of word is here. Note that the definition is wrong, saying it originated with Superman in 1982, when actually it originated in 1962 for the old movie on top of this list. Most if not all online dictionaries have this same mistake!

all of these are real words that can be made from 'brainiac'- look them up!

Search This Blog

.

Dutchess

Sweet Daughter

Lursa

the sweetest kitty ever

Mikey

the big guy

Tigger

aka 'sirlixalot'

Saber Tooth Cat

the vampiric tripod...

Americans

Thinking is rare these days, very rare. The effects of 50 years of fluoride is taking its toll on the vast majority of Americans. Their memories, their logic, their long term thinking, their common sense- all fading, fading, fading...

I don't know how many times I have heard people say "I need my meds!" "I don't read." "Got a smoke?" "I could never be a vegetarian- I love my meat too much." "Tap water is fine." "Pot is as safe as cigarettes." "Smokers have rights!" "Drugs are a personal choice.." ...ad nauseum.

Just like the true addictive nature of meat consumption or heroin, tap water drinking has become the newest thoughtless action amongst millions. Destroying your brain is of no concern anymore, none at all. After all, did the govt. tell you it is unhealthy? If not then don't worry about it. Smile and kill your brains while they feed you rat poison...it's ok. Start young, folks. Then fight tooth and nail against reason to perpetuate your addicitions: street drugs, excessive prescriptions, over the counter meds, tobacco, meat, city water- it's all the same.

crusades: redux

this is one of the lower estimates of the civilian casualties only. it does not account for injuries, maimings, birth defects from irradiated soil and air (DU weapon use), disease from ruined water supplies, deaths from lack of food and medicine, the torture, the hundreds of billions of dollars spent, etc. etc...but the bush and cheney families made a lot of money from it so it is 'okay'. the fact that their former regime had nothing to do with 9/11, and that no WMDs were ever found, is never talked about. see also this recent study.

Freya

Mistress of Cats

cinnamon challenge

this blogger was shocked to learn of a new fad called 'cinnamon challenge'. teens try to eat a spoonful of cinnamon. for some odd reason they have made a viral net phenomenon of it. why do people like to hurt themselves and act stupid?i tried it once years ago but not because of a net dare. it was because i read in many places that cinnamon lowers blood sugar and alleviates diabetes. you can even buy capsules of it for this. i thought, why buy when i can get some from the kitchen and use a tablespoon? it was horrid, fiery, grainy, inedible crap. i felt like dying for a couple minutes. and now, this is a fad? with 30,000 videos so far?at least i had a good and innocent reason to try it. what's their excuse?cinnamon challenge-- more like logic challenge.

BIGFOOT IS REAL

click on photo

Jamie's Diet Plan

These 3 rules are the perfect diet:

1. Eat less

2. Exercise more

3. Eat and drink as healthily as possible

To expound on these rules a little:

1. Eating less means do not eat until your stomach hurts. Period. Then eat only "one serving" according to the package guidelines. Not much? It's ok, just wait until you have another stomach ache. A pattern will ensue and your body will grow accustomed to it.

2. Exercising more means walk around your neighborhood every day without exception, no matter the weather. Go farther every day, find a hill to go up. Keep it up until you can run up the hill without getting winded. Then start jogging. OR, join a gym and use it daily.

3. Eating/drinking as healthily as possible means only eat foods that are healthy. Do not be fooled by fads or propaganda. Ever wonder why vegetarians are so healthy? Look into it. And drink only natural 100% fruit juices, distilled water, and natural hot teas. Sweeten only with stevia. Aspartame is bad for you, tap water is bad for you. This rules out "diet" sodas, which keep you fat. In general, eat lots of vegetables, and some beans, fruits, breads, and pastas. Avoid sugars and white flours, and take vitamin C and chromium to boost metabolism. Fish oils and carbs are widely misperceived. Fish oil is bad for you, carbs are not. Flaxseed oil clears arteries better than fish oil but without the sea toxins; and carbs do not turn into sugar and fatten you to the degree the Atkins scam has everyone believing.

Just do a little research.

Easier said than done, I know. But this is simple; commonsense. Just do it.

----------------------------------NOTE:about a year ago someone emailed me requesting permission to make an app out of the plan above. I said sure, and once it was done she asked for my opinion. I did not write back, but will post it here:-it appears to have nothing to do with the plan I wrote-it involves eating meat-it does not mention my name or site at all, which is improper if it is supposedly based upon my ideas.-I suspect an attempt to gain free advertising for their diet game on my site.- I am glad my name was not attached to it.-reiterating...I condone nothing that involves carnivorous behavior.

ILLEGAL ALIENS CONTRIBUTE GREATLY

HEALTH CARE: Since 1990, 70 hospital emergency rooms and trauma centers have closed in California in large part because of free care provided to illegals. (NY TIMES, Saturday, October 6, 2007). More than 40 million American citizens are without health insurance, but their tax dollars pay for illegals to be treated free. (Health Insurance Coverage: 2001, U.S. Census Bureau).

DISEASE: Illegals also account for over 65% of communicable diseases such as TB, hepatitis, leprosy, and AIDS. (The Centers for Disease Control).

EDUCATION: US citizens pay $7.4 billion dollars each year to pay for the free education that US law requires be given illegals. At least 19 states allow illegals to attend their public universities and only pay in-state tuition, while legal residents of neighboring states must pay out-of-state tuition rates which are three to eight times more. (Federation for American Immigration Reform).

LOYALITY TO COUNTRY: Co-founder of MALDEF, Mario Obledo, to whom President Clinton awarded the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom, boasted, “California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn’t like it should leave.” (Ray Briem Radio Show and Tom Lykis Radio Show).

EMPLOYMENT: Illegals have already cost American workers $133 billion in salary cuts and job losses. (The Center for Immigration Studies).

CRIME: It is against federal law to enter this country illegally, thus all illegal aliens are criminals. If an American citizen breaks a law, he is not given handouts, he goes to jail. (US Code). A governmentstudy of 55,322 illegal aliens incarcerated in federal, state, and local facilities during 2003 found that these 55,322 illegal aliens were arrested for a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses, averaging about 13 offenses per illegal alien. (GAO Report, April 2005).

TAXES: Illegals cost the taxpayer $10 billion more than they contribute in taxes each year. (Center for Immigration Studies).

for alysia, my rocket queen

la babe

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

all content on this site is subject to federal copyright laws. it may not be copied, pasted, framed, or otherwise reproduced without the written permission of its author, james platt. this includes posts, pictures, and sidebar entries. violations will be reported immediately.jamesplatt88@gmail.com

providing a link does NOT legalize pasting other people's work.many think it does, but the internet is not an unregulated free for all. i have personally had 14 sites taken down for copying my posts.

if you really want to repost something i have written, ASK me.

if you own any pics i missed giving credit to or want removed, let me know; i will be glad to comply.