According to a former Zionist who changed his name from Friedman to Freedman, 90% of the people who call themselves “Jews” (a term, he insists, was coined in the late 18th century) are descendants of a war-mongering Finn-Turko tribe that populated a large area of modern day Russia, called the Khazars, who in the same fashion that Roman emperor Constantine adopted Christianity as the official state religion for Rome, adopted Judaism – or actually, Talmudism, which it ought to be termed more accurately, according to Freedman – as their religion of choice in the 700s, and just as the Roman alphabet was adopted by many European nations to put their language into writing, they adopted the Hebrew alphabet, thus creating the origins of the Yiddish language, which is apparently as different from Hebrew as Spanish from Swedish, and according to Freedman, you won’t find a single Hebrew word in it.

According to Freedman, this makes the present occupants of the country currently called Israel only as legitimate and only as much “God’s chosen people” as Christian clergy are drilled into brainwashing their flocks that they are.

Lately I’ve been contemplating for the first time what a dear Russian friend and brother told me a few years ago, that Putin could possibly the Antichrist. Back then I figured, “No way, dude.” For one thing, the Bible describes the final world ruler before Christ’s return as “a king of fierce countenance” (Daniel 8:23), and I always perceived Putin’s face as a little too jolly to fit that description. But recently I read an article about Putin putting on “a grim face” when addressing his audience in England (I think), and “grim face” would pretty much be the modern translation of “fierce countenance.”

But then I thought, hey, but he’d have to be a Jew, in order for the Jews to hail him as their Messiah, reinstitute their daily worship in the rebuilt temple, etc. (see John 5:43)…

But in the light of the facts that Benjamin Freedman revealed, namely that “Jew” is a coined phrase, similar to the coined term for artificial silk, which is “rayon,” the concoction of which the author received a 25.000$ bonus for, I’d say, to hell with whether he’s a “Jew” or not, and they – whoever “they” are in the first place, (if “they” are anything at all), probably might figure the same thing, as long as he gets them what they want – only to take it away from the 3 1/2 years later, that is…

It sort of gives a new, deeper meaning to what Jesus says in the Book of Revelation: “I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan” (Rev.2:9) – the original word for “Jews” then having been “Judeans,” obviously. Or to what Paul meant when he said, “He is not a Jew which is one outwardly; …But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly…” (Romans 2:28, 29), even though the Khazars weren’t around then yet. Maybe he had a prophetic inkling. After all, he was pretty right on about what was going to befall the church… (2Timothy 4:3,4)

Freedman also gives a few examples from the Talmud, which is the magna carta that defines the belief of those who call themselves Jews, and if there is one quality about it in that it definitely surpasses any of the other major world religions, it would be the one one would term “anti-Christ.”

Have you ever wondered why – if the “Jews” are supposedly a Semitic “race,” meaning, descendants of Noah’s son Shem (that’s where the word Semitic comes from), likethe Arabic and some Asian nations, probably including American Natives, most of them don’t look the least bit like it, but are as white as Mr. and Mrs. Jones? Well, here’s the answer: they’re not. Most people who call themselves Jews today are not actual descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (descendants of Shem, and thus legitimate Semites by race), but descendants of the Eastern European tribe named Khazars (descendants of Noah’s son Japheth, like all other Europeans), whose king one fine day simply chose to convert to the religion of the Judeans.

This makes the Palestinians’ claim to Palestine more legitimate than that of its present occupants, because they – unlike most of their invaders – are at least descendants of Abraham, and legitimate Semites.

But all that doesn’t really matter. If you choose the god of this world for your boss, he’ll take good care of you and he’ll supply you with all that which Jesus refused when he tempted Him, namely this world’s riches, and money speaks louder than blood. If you’ve got the dough and you’re on the right side, you can be anything you like to be.

So, if Putin one day decides, “What the heck, I’m going to be the friggin’ Antichrist,” all he’d have to do would be to convert to Judaism, since it’s common knowledge now that there isn’t really largely any such thing as a legitimate “Jew” by race anyway, and he could give’em their temple, their worship, and still manage to somehow make things right for the Palestinians and Muslims somehow – for a change…

Another biblical description of the Antichrist is that he’s “a little horn (king)… more stout than his fellows.” I originally thought in order to be “stout” you’d have to be tall and tough. But you can be relatively small and tough and still be “stout,” and I think that’s precisely what Putin is: Definitely more “stout” than his predecessors since “We willbury you” Khrushchev, and certainly more so than any of his string-for-a-backbone peers in the current political scenario.

As far as acting in an Antichrist manner, Putin has already made clear what he thinks of Christianity of any other kind than that of the Russian Orthodox church by his tough restrictions on missionary activities in Russia, practically banning all other faiths, perhaps giving his countrymen a little foretaste of the future “war on the saints“?

Finally, here’s another little wild theory: If “Babylon the Great,” of Revelations 17 and 18, the great city that in one hour will be destroyed, is in fact – as I believe – the U.S., or at least its spiritual capital, New York (according to Freedman the world capital not only of Captialism, but also of Zionism), then it would be a curious symbolic repeat performance of the present day “dual kingdom” of Medvedev and Putin’s Russia, symbolized by a bear, just like the dual kingdom of Medo-Persia, to conquer modern day Babylon in similar fashion as its ancient counterpart.

It seems to be giving greater weight to the symbolism and deeper meaning behind destroying Babylon the Prostitute that in doing so, it will be the wiping out of not just one fake religion, but two. Two spiritual prostitutes under one roof, claiming to be the brides of the true God, when in reality worshiping Mammon all along…

The Medo-Persians conquered Babylon by stealth and wit, not by sheer “We are the champions” type of brawn and muscle power. They entered the Babylonian capital via its sewage systems and caught the partying Babylonian king by surprise. From all I can tell right now, it should be a piece of cake for someone like Putin to outwit the probably dumbest nation on earth and put an end to the party they’re having at the expense of the rest of the world.

The current U.S. threats and touting of manhood size reminds me of the scene in “Little Big Man,” one of my favorite movies of all times, in which Custer asks Little Big Man (Dustin Hoffman in his best role ever) whether he should go down to his “last stand” and fight the Indians. He was going to do the opposite of whatever the known traitor was going to tell him. And he answered something to the extent of, “You go down there and there’s going to be Inidans down there you wish you hadn’t messed with, not just women and children…” (like the kind it’s easy to shoot from Iraqui roof tops) “…and you’re going to get your butt kicked!”

Personally, I can’t wait for history to repeat itself.

So, give the fake Jews their fake messiah who’s going to turn on them and kick theirs, too. As far as I can see it, if McCain wins the coming election, this whole show is going to go down within a few short years.

In reply to Frank’s comment on my blog entry “Babylon the Whore,” I’d like to get into the details a little deeper, of why I disagree, and can’t believe that the Roman Catholic church is supposed to be “Babylon” of Revelations 17 & 18. I already brought out some of these points in my recent entry about “The Gospel of Acquisition,” but I just read a wonderful book review, confirming my beliefs once more, but also helping me realize that the materialism is only one side of the coin, and the lesser of 2 evils. Certainly the Catholice Church is just as guilty of materialism as anyone, there’s no doubt about that. But there are a few descriptions of the entity Babylon that simply couldn’t be ascribed to either Rome, nor ancient Babylon somehow myseriously revived (especially in the light of that country – Iraq – having been wrecked & devastated for at least the next century), which I’d like to point out, that seem to point at some bigger culprit than the two combined, however piously innocent she’s trying to come across.

One of the principal reasons why Rome couldn’t possibly be synonymous with with the “fallen lady” of Revelation is that it’s commonly accepted by Bible scholars that “the 10 horns which…shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate ” (Rev.17:16) represent the 10 leading European nations, of which Italy is obviously one, so, it’s impossible for Rome to represent both, the Whore and the capital of the 10 horns.

As I already brought out in my study of Rev.-17 & 18, we’re talking about “that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth” (17:18). While that may have been the case with Rome during the time John wrote this, and he may even have believed that he was writing about Rome at the time, when we look at the present (for which those prophecies and revelations obviously given, since we are living in the times that see the Endtime events unfolding before us), then Rome hardly has a say in a lot of countries. Let me list some of the most outstanding ones for you: 1) Roman Catholicism is completely irrelevant to Russia, since they have their own, orthodox version of Catholiscism, which has nothing to do with the Roman version, nor does the Vatican have any say over it, much less does it “reign” over any secular areas of Russian life.2) China, which by some is already hailed the “next superpower” and the greatest stronghold of socialism presently on earth, may definitely be infected with the Western bug of capitalism and materialism and somewhat intimidated by not so much the American government as the United Nations, but certainly it would be absurd to indicate that Rome exerts any power over China. Subtract Russia and China, and you’ve already got 2 of the biggest, most powerful and most populated countries on earth which definitely don’t fall into the group of countries that Rome exerts power over. The same goes for smaller countries like Korea, Myanmar, Malaysia and virtually all Muslim countries, along with countries like India, which may have a few Catholic missions here or there, but saying that Rome “reigns” over them would be sheer exaggeration.

The only city that comes close to fulfilling the criteria of “reigning” over those countries is the seat of the United Nations. – However, the real power is not found within the walls of the U.N., but in the buidling across the street, where world policies and wars for tomorrow are being planned and cooked up today, the CFR, some of whose key members also reside in that great city which makes Rome look like a pueblito (little village) in comparison.

We can argue about the scope of influence that the Catholic Church is exerting over the nations on international levels, compared to the American Mass media. We can also argue over the amount of damage being done by either. At least the Catholic Church is still somewhat devoted to spreading somewhat Christian virtues, but you couldn’t possibly say that about Mickey Mouse or Rambo.

Let’s say, if I had a choice between a ticket to Rome and one to N.Y.C. at the time of judgment, I’d prefer Rome any day, although I hate big cities per se.

Besides, it wouldn’t take a whole hour to destroy Rome. It might not take an hour to destroy N.Y., either, but I’m still not sure whether I believe that the destruction and judgment will be limited to that city alone.

In my opinion, the refusal to see America’s guilt and the interpretation that Rome is the big culprit is just another pitiful case of wishful thinking and self-deception.

There was a time when I tended to see the Babylon of Revelation as a solely spiritual entity, which is the current doctrine of my own faith community (so please, don’t blame them for my anti-U.S. rantings), although nearly 40 years ago our founder taught without hesitation that Babylon was America. That was during the Vietnam era, and our group’s nickname for Nixon was “Nitler.” Well, we all know now that indeed a lot worse could befall the world than Nixon and Watergate. You’ll definitely find more parallels drawn by Americans between Hitler and Bush.
But you can’t really destroy a spiritual entity with fire, and not within 60 minutes. You can’t see the smoke of a spiritual entity burning and sailors standing from afar bewailing it. It must be a physical place that Revelation 17 and 18 is talking about. And I simply believe that there is a greater sin to be judged here than the sins of the Catholic Church. A sin which has finally been publicly addressed in a book by one courageous Christian writer who must have found one other courageous publisher, unless he published it himself.

Ladies and gentlemen, let me humbly present to you my hero of the day, Lawrence M. Vance, in his own historic words from his excellent book I honestly urge you to buy, (because if you don’t, who will?):

“Christians who condone the warfare state and its nebulous crusades against ‘evil’ have been duped. There is nothing ‘Christian’ about the state’s aggressive militarism, its senseless wars, its interventions into the affairs of other countries, and its expanding empire.

‘The chief wonder is that Christians, followers of the Prince of Peace, should have concurred in this mad idolatry of strife, and thus been inconsistent not only with themselves, but with the very genius of their system.’

The fact that a government claims a war is just is irrelevant, for American history is replete with examples of American presidents who have exaggerated, misinformed, misrepresented, and lied to deceive the American people into supporting wars that they would not have supported if they had known the facts.

Many supporters of the senseless war in Iraq are high on religion. Add a religious element to a war and the faithful will come out in droves in support of it. In the case of the current war in Iraq this is easy to do. Because the United States is supposedly a ‘Christian nation,’ the war can be turned into a modern-day crusade since Iraq is a ‘Muslim’ nation.

“Christian warmongers … would rather be associated with Bush and the war than with people whom they and others have deemed undesirable. In actuality, however, they are choosing to be associated with a war criminal and murder than with the truth just because some people who are usually wrong happen to be right on this particular issue.

Rather than receiving a proclamation of liberty, what many people in foreign countries receive instead are threats, bombs, and bullets.

From a Christian perspective there is only one way to describe U.S. foreign policy: It is evil. It was evil before the United States invaded Iraq, and it would still be evil if the United States withdrew all of its forces from Iraq tomorrow. It is because of our foreign policy that the U.S. military has become—through its wars, interventions, and occupations—the greatest force for evil in the world. U.S. foreign policy sows discord among nations, stirs up strife where none existed, intensifies the hatred that many foreigners around the world have for Americans and each other, and creates terrorists faster than we can kill them.

Is asking God to bless and protect the troops as they shoot, bomb, maim, mine, destroy, ‘interrogate,’ and kill for a rogue state with an evil foreign policy consistent with the Christianity you find in the New Testament?”

I’ve been watching the first 7 issues of Chuck Missler’s Revelation video series on Google Video last week, and while I am thankful for the elaborate background information Missler gives on the deeper significance that lies in the Letters to the 7 Churches, there are also points in which I personally feel he’s totally off the track, such as the erroneous Pre-Tribulation Rapture, of course, but also his identifying Babylon the Whore as literal ancient Babylon in Iraq. I’ve also read portions of Dave Hunt’s book “A Woman Rides The Beast,” which Chuck Missler repeatedly recommends, to see whether I would be able to reconcile with the tought that Babylon the great Whore as described in Revelations 17 and 18 could perhaps be Rome, but also in this case, I must acredit those two Americans’ interpretation of those Scriptures to the same – typical for Americans – wishful thinking that misleads millions of Christians to belief in a Pre-Tribulation Rapture.

While it is certainly true that Rome and the Catholic Church are guilty of the blood of innocent millions, and it’s certainly true that the remnant of what used to be true Christianity that they are presenting to the world as such is blasphemous and certainly good reason for God’s indignation, it takes Americans to fail to recognize that the slaughter, rape of the truth and untold bloodshed perpetrated by their own country over the past centuries makes even Rome look innocent and saintly by comparison.

The bloody tracks lead to another “great and mighty city” that “sitteth upon many waters” and plays the tunes to which all nations really dance, be it financially, culturally or polictically. A city, so great and mighty, in fact, that modern day Rome looks like a little village in comparison, the skyline of which you see daily on TVs, billboads and web pages or in movie theatres all over the world

Just read for yourself the verses about “Babylon the Great Whore” which shall be destroyed in one hour, and make up your mind, whether this is most applicable to the Italian city of Rome, the – howbeit rebuilt – ruins of ancient Babylon in Iraq, or the City which not only houses the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, but also the financers behind it all, including the very material they’re forcing on our kids in school as “truth” every day: Rockefellers & Co.

If you’re in touch with reality at all, and you’re bold enough to face the ugly truth about your beloved and oh so great country, you’ll see that the other 2 alternatives are pitifully erroneous wishful thinking cooked up by people whose loyalty is rather to the flag of their country than the cross, when Jesus told His disciples clearly that they were not of this world, just as He wasn’t.

America, it’s time to open up your eyes that the rest of the world is seeing through your camouflage of “democracy.” You’ve just become another big bully world empire, dictating your views on the rest of the world, you’re the greatest oppressor of the poor and innocent this world has ever seen in its pitiful history, and you’re going to reap what you’ve sown. God promises it, and there won’t be any “Pre-Tribulation Rapture,” either, to save you out of it! Oh, and did I mention it? Your President is a mass murderer, – and he’s not the first in line – going down in history as another infamous villain like Hitler and Stalin, who were ultimately brought into power by your money in the first place, too.

What you may not know is, that the Beast you’re riding on, that wonderful and glorious “New World Order” your head honchos like Bush Sr., are so eagerly promoting, will turn against you, rend you in pieces and devour your flesh. Read Revelations 17 and 18 for what they are! Read and weep!