1) Multiple competing incompatible choices. Not just between HD DVD and Blu-ray, but also between different HD formats. 720p/1080i vs. 1080p, HDMI/HDCP vs. component. People aren’t adopting HD formats because they’re confusing.

2) Does not fit into existing home theater setups easily. If you had a DVD home theater, chances are you’re replacing most, if not all of your components to get to HD – you need a new TV/projector, you probably need some new switches, you need all new cabling, and you need at least three new players to do it right (HD DVD, Blu-ray, and an upscaling DVD player so your old DVDs look good). Not to mention a new programmable remote to control the now 7 or more components in your new setup (receiver, projector/tv, 3 players, HDMI switch, audio/component switch).

3) Clear, obvious quality advantages, but only if properly tuned and all of them work properly together. I can easily tell the difference between even HD movies and upscaled DVD movies. Upscaled DVD movies look fantastic, but HD movies really pop off the screen. But if things aren’t properly configured or you’re using the wrong cabling, these advantages disappear.

4) No significant convenience advantages, with some disadvantages. Pretty much the same extras, but most discs now won’t let you resume playback from the same place if you press stop in the middle, and they make you watch the warnings and splash screens again.

I’ve gone the HD route, because I really care about very high video quality, and I love tinkering with this stuff. Most people don’t, and find it incredibly confusing and expensive.

Is it really any wonder that people are holding off?

The HD format war is already lost, by existing at all, and every day that both formats are available for sale just makes things worse. The only good way out of it is to erase the distinction between the two formats – dual format players that reach the killer price point and aren’t filled with bugs.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/09/28/the-hd-format-war-is-lost-by-existing/feed/0Newer PS3s apparently use software emulation for PS2 gameshttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/09/02/newer-ps3s-apparently-use-software-emulation-for-ps2-games/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/09/02/newer-ps3s-apparently-use-software-emulation-for-ps2-games/#commentsSun, 02 Sep 2007 13:35:25 +0000adamhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/09/02/newer-ps3s-apparently-use-software-emulation-for-ps2-games/Apparently, Sony dropped including the PS2 hardware in the 80GB model, and the last version that includes it is the now discontinued, recently price-cut $499 60GB model. If you care about playing older PS2 games and are thinking about getting a PS3, you probably want to get that one, before it disappears. It should also be noted that the HD is user-replaceable, so there’s actually very little tradeoff there.

The new model includes a software emulator, but a fairly large number of the older games have at least some problems.

I’ve really been pretty blown away by how much fun the PS3 is, both for the newer games (which are huge and gorgeous) and for how much better it makes the PS2 experience – all games that support it can play in widescreen, everything’s faster, using the hard drive instead of memory cards is both more convenient and MUCH faster, and the analog sticks are more precise. I think dropping the hardware emulator is an unfortunate cost-saving move that will probably diminish the experience, if you care about that.

Also interesting – I found this list of current and upcoming PS3 exclusives, including PSN (downloadable) games:

I think the PS3 has only shown a mere fraction of its power, and Sony didn’t do even a passable job of promoting it properly at launch, but the slate of games on the list for the next six months and beyond has me very excited.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/09/02/newer-ps3s-apparently-use-software-emulation-for-ps2-games/feed/0Does your old PS2 play dual-layer DVD games?http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/03/19/does-your-old-ps2-play-dual-layer-dvd-games/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/03/19/does-your-old-ps2-play-dual-layer-dvd-games/#commentsMon, 19 Mar 2007 22:21:08 +0000adamhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/03/19/does-your-old-ps2-play-dual-layer-dvd-games/I have an old Playstation 2 (30001 series). It has never played dual-layer DVD movies – it plays the first layer, and then freezes. Everyone I know with this model has the same issue with it. It was never a problem, because all of the games on DVD that I had were single layer. But now they’ve started releasing games on dual-layer DVD, notably God of War 2. And, of course, it won’t play on my old player. The official word from Sony is that this is a problem isolated to my machine (which also, incidentally, has stopped playing the purple CD-ROM games too), and they want me to pay $45 for a refurbished machine of the same old model. Before I do that, I’d like to locate some corroborating opinions.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2007/03/19/does-your-old-ps2-play-dual-layer-dvd-games/feed/3Bosses generally suckhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/05/08/bosses-generally-suck/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/05/08/bosses-generally-suck/#commentsMon, 08 May 2006 21:19:59 +0000adamhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/05/08/bosses-generally-suck/Hah, fooled you. This is a gaming post, not a business post. Wired article on the greatness of boss battles:

I disagree. I often find the boss battles to be the most tedious parts of the game. Instead of another interesting level, you’re treated to a 10-30 minute repetetive motion fest until you can find the one pattern that works against the increasingly overpowered enemy.

Sometimes, this is well done, but often not. I’d feel better about them if the boss battles required a little strategy or intelligence beyond “Find the four switches/weak spots/colors, hit them in order, then the boss will reveal the little extra boss inside the other boss and you can kill that too. And once you figure out the trick, the next three are all exactly the same as the first one, and between doing these tasks, you have to run in circles to avoid the predictable fireballs/rocks/energy blasts.”

The Vizier in Prince of Persia 3? Nope, I don’t think so. That battle almost killed me with its tedium alone. I could almost hear Hank Azaria’s character narrating along between hits … “dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge!” And to add insult to injury, after a fantastic game about sand powers and time travel, you get to use almost none of those interesting powers, because there’s no refill sand during the battle. Bleh.

God of War was refreshing in this instance, by accident. They had to leave some of the bosses out due to time pressure, and I’ve never been so relieved as I was when progressing from one really interesting level to another really interesting level without another button masher in the middle.

The boss battles should be woven into the pace of the game, not grind it to a halt. Integrate the boss battles into everything else. Have other stuff going on at the same time. Punctuate it. Don’t make me start all over unless I do every single keypress right. If the way to kill the boss is to find the pattern and do something specific more than once, you’ve done something wrong. When done well, boss battles can be interesting. But they rarely are anything more than a placeholder for a lack of gameplay imagination.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/05/08/bosses-generally-suck/feed/0Update on DOJ/Googlehttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/19/update-on-dojgoogle/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/19/update-on-dojgoogle/#commentsThu, 19 Jan 2006 23:52:09 +0000adamhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/19/update-on-dojgoogle/This is a fascinating deconstruction of the court documents and letters available so far:

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2006/01/19/update-on-dojgoogle/feed/0Prince of Persia – The Two Throneshttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/12/05/prince-of-persia-the-two-thrones/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/12/05/prince-of-persia-the-two-thrones/#commentsTue, 06 Dec 2005 01:55:00 +0000adamhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/12/05/prince-of-persia-the-two-thrones/Once again, the folks from Ubisoft have delivered an amazing game experience. The Prince of Persia games have been consistently top-notch in terms of beautiful graphics, fluid action, and the best acrobatic combat engine around, and The Two Thrones continues the trend.

Just a heads up – the PS2 version seems to have a minor glitch. In the Hanging Gardens of Babylon after the elevator, there’s a dagger hole on the center column after a narrow shimmy crevice. There’s another dagger hole clearly visible off to the left, but pushing left and pressing R1 causes the Prince to jump to the right instead, off the pole and to his death. There’s nowhere else to go, and pushing right and pressing R1 does nothing. I discovered through trial and error that pushing UP and pressing R1 sends him left, as needed.

That’s good. I like console games, but I really hate the standard console controller, and have pretty much since I ever picked it up. I’ve gotten used to it, but I still find it very clunky and unnatural for many kinds of games. My gut says this is a good move.

“LEGO is starting a new program called LEGO Factory where you can download a desktop application that allows you to create a custom brick design. You can take the designs you create using the LEGO Digital Designer software, upload them to the LEGO website, and actually order a kit of LEGO bricks that will make the design you specâ€™d out.”

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/08/22/canon-announces-5d-12mp-dslr-for-3300-retail/feed/0Some things I really want my next console to dohttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/07/01/some-things-i-really-want-my-next-console-to-do/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/07/01/some-things-i-really-want-my-next-console-to-do/#commentsFri, 01 Jul 2005 14:29:49 +0000adam/?p=844I’ve been reading over the specs and thoughts for the new consoles, and I haven’t seen any discussion of some things I REALLY want out of the next generation of console games:

NO LOAD SCREENS ONCE THE GAME STARTS. Just stop that right now.

Profiles! Multiple people in my house play games. There’s no reason for single-player games to make it difficult to figure out who saved which game. Also, don’t make me sit through a load screen before making my choice. Different cards for each person aren’t a good answer for this.

Varied controllers. The gamepad is okay for many kinds of games, but hands down, one of the best gaming experiences I’ve ever had was playing Tie Fighter two handed with an F-16 Combatstick and a separate throttle. I see no reason why I shouldn’t be able to get this kind of experience in my living room. Similarly, you can’t play RTS games with a gamepad. The controls just don’t work. Give me some innovation here.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/07/01/some-things-i-really-want-my-next-console-to-do/feed/0Psychonauts is funhttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/06/27/psychonauts-is-fun/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/06/27/psychonauts-is-fun/#commentsMon, 27 Jun 2005 15:24:25 +0000adam/?p=834I’ve just started playing Psychonauts, and it’s tremendous fun. I’ve been a fan of Tim Schafer games for a long time – I’ve played all of them except Day of the Tentacle.

It’s rare to find kid friendly games that aren’t boring for adults.

I’ll be posting a review to Buy Adam when I’m done with it, but there’s one piece of dialogue I just have to share (possibly slightly inaccurately quoted from memory):

Raz: They’ll be looking for Raz, the boy, but they’ll find Raz… the Psychonaut!
Dogen: And then you’ll make their heads explode?
Raz: What? No! You do that?
Dogen: No…
Dogen: Except that one time. But now I wear this special hat. Do you want to try on my hat?
Raz: No, no, that’s okay.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/06/27/psychonauts-is-fun/feed/0Ur-Quan Mastershttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/06/14/ur-quan-masters/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/06/14/ur-quan-masters/#commentsTue, 14 Jun 2005 15:18:29 +0000adam/?p=813The open source Star Control 2 project released a new version recently.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/01/18/mini-keychain-plants/feed/0Do the ipod shuffle.http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/01/12/do-the-ipod-shuffle/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2005/01/12/do-the-ipod-shuffle/#commentsWed, 12 Jan 2005 15:53:53 +0000adam/?p=493Apple announced a few new products today.

Some of them are interesting.

The Mac mini is a $500 sub-mac, no monitor, mouse, or keyboard. This, actually, is sort of exactly what I’ve been waiting for to tempt someone like me who has absolutely no use for a Mac as a general computer, but would like some of the benefits that the Mac has for dealing with, say, digital pictures. I think these will sell astonishingly well. This seems like a really smart thing in providing a gradual upgrade path from the iPod (or nothing) to this, to eventually one or more Macs.

The iPod Shuffle is a small (512MB or 1GB), low-cost iPod with no screen. You plug it in, and iTunes autofills it with a random assortment of songs (from your Mac mini, maybe). Then you can skip back and forth. That’s it. No choice. Simple. It’s tiny, it’s easy, it’s brainless. It’s missing something – you should be able to rate songs on it (even just a yes/no), so it learns (actually, so iTunes learns) over time what you want and don’t want on it. If you want to keep this really simple, have it register a “no” if you immediately skip past the song once it starts playing, or in the middle. That could even be rolled out with a firmware upgrade. I have a LOT of random crap on my music server. In its favor, it does include a warning right on the product page not to eat it.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/26/games-knoppix/feed/0Top 100 toys of “yesteryear”http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/23/top-100-toys-of-yesteryear/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/23/top-100-toys-of-yesteryear/#commentsThu, 23 Dec 2004 22:52:24 +0000adam/?p=407http://tv.cream.org/extras/toys/index.html
]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/23/top-100-toys-of-yesteryear/feed/0Moldable plastichttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/22/moldable-plastic/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/22/moldable-plastic/#commentsWed, 22 Dec 2004 19:09:45 +0000adam/?p=401“You get a bag of plastic pellets, put them in 160F water, and they phase change, becoming soft and moldable. If you don’t let the water get too hot, when you take the plastic out, it’s cool enough to shape with your hands.

When it cools down, it hardens into a strong, durable, paintable, machine-able white plastic. If you don’t like what you made, you just put it in 160F water again and reshape it.”

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/22/moldable-plastic/feed/0There had to have been a better choice of wordshttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/16/there-had-to-have-been-a-better-choice-of-words/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/16/there-had-to-have-been-a-better-choice-of-words/#commentsThu, 16 Dec 2004 21:13:14 +0000adam/?p=377Gillette is getting ready to release a vibrating version of their Venus razor for women.

This is probably very cool – as I’ve mentioned before, the M3 Power is much better than the non-vibrating Mach 3.

The Gillette “President for blades and razors” had this to say about the product launch:

‘Our testing indicated that there is an upside potential to penetrate more razors at a slightly reduced price.’

I’ll resist the tempation, but there are just so many places to go with this one.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/16/there-had-to-have-been-a-better-choice-of-words/feed/0A Star Wars game retrospectivehttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/16/a-star-wars-game-retrospective/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/12/16/a-star-wars-game-retrospective/#commentsThu, 16 Dec 2004 20:23:02 +0000adam/?p=373I think Shadows of the Empire remains one of the best games I’ve ever played. Tie Fighter is a close second in this batch.

But anyway, yay! I remember when the StarTac was the only cellphone to have. Mototola owned pretty much the entire market, and they pissed it away. The Razr and now this seem to be getting back to where they shine – SMALL AND FUNCTIONAL.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/30/anime-mousepads-with-ergonomic-breasts/feed/0How to choose a computer from partshttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/29/how-to-build-a-computer-from-parts/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/29/how-to-build-a-computer-from-parts/#commentsMon, 29 Nov 2004 18:04:10 +0000adam/?p=303This is adapted from a response I wrote to someone on a mailing list asking for help in picking components for a home-built machine. I’m a big fan of this – you can tune the parts to your liking, you get an intimate sense of how things fit together, and it’s substantially cheaper than buying the same machine from a vendor.

When I actually get around to buying a new machine (maybe some time in the next few months), I promise to document the process of assembling all of these pieces and put together a guide for that.

This is primarily intended as a jumpstart guide. Yes, you can do lots of research and handpick all of your components for the most performance, but that’s not the point of this. The point of this is that with fairly little work, you can assemble a PC that’s on par with what you can get pre-assembled, for a fraction of the price. At a certain point, the amount of work it takes to figure out what to get is counterproductive, but I strongly feel that it doesn’t need to be that difficult, and the basic choices are much simpler than that. You can get into the details of which chipsets are better later, if you ever care (probably not).

Pick the options you know you care about (RAID, fast front-side bus, processor type (intel or AMD), onboard lan, slots maybe). Leave everything else set to "any". Double check the options and make sure everything you care about is listed, otherwise keep looking. Everything the motherboard is compatible with will be listed in the description.

I’ve done this for you below, but the process is always the same – pick a motherboard, pick a processor that works with it, add some ram and storage, pick a video board, and then get a case to put it all in.

It’s a P4, with SATA raid support, 800Mhz FSB, 4 DIMM slots, 8x AGP, and gigabit ethernet and audio onboard. (Note: AMD is a perfectly viable alternative, if you want to go that route. It’s personal preference. I’ve never built an AMD machine from parts, but it’s much the same. I’ve never had any trouble with the pre-built Athlons I have.)

Now, you’ll need the following other things, which all depend on which motherboard you picked:

1) CPU. Pick anything that fits your slot and speed. The motherboard description will help you out here.

5) Video board (if you have no onboard video – I would recommend getting a standalone video board). This is up to you. If you just want a server, a $30 or cheaper video board will be plenty. If you want to play games, consider a high-end ATI or Nvidia.

And, optionally:
7) Sound card (if you have no onboard sound) Network adapter (if you have no onboard network or want wifi)

That should do it. I can’t guarantee that the parts will all work together, since I haven’t tried it, but I’ve had no problems with this process in the past, and as long as the specs match up, you should be fine. For the record, this list of components came out of my shopping cart – this is what I’m considering getting for my next box (and why I took the time to put together this list). This machine will cost a little more than $1000, and you know what all of the components are. It should take 1-2 hours to assemble.

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/13/new-logitech-speakers-actually-go-to-11/feed/0Engergizer 15-minute charger works will all NiMH AA(A) batterieshttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/09/engergizer-15-minute-charger-works-will-all-nimh-aaa-batteries/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/09/engergizer-15-minute-charger-works-will-all-nimh-aaa-batteries/#commentsWed, 10 Nov 2004 01:08:07 +0000adam/?p=181I love the Rayovac 15-minute charger. 15 minute charging crossed the threshold that if I didn’t remember to charge batteries the night before, I still have time to do so before I leave the house. But it only works with Rayovac (or radio shack) special batteries. They’re actually really good, but not particularly cheap. This new charger works with any NiMH rechargeable:

]]>http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/11/09/konfabulator-is-cool/feed/0XM MyFihttp://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/26/xm-myfi/
http://www.aquick.org/blog/2004/10/26/xm-myfi/#commentsTue, 26 Oct 2004 21:27:16 +0000adam/?p=112The world’s first portable satellite radio. We have an XM radio in the car and a PC receiver. I really like XM Radio, for no reason I can articulate other than "I can always find a station I’d rather stay on than turn off". There you go.