UN into Syria?

The UN will roll into Syria, hand the country over to the Jihadis at the expense of everyone else including the Orthodox Christians who have been there since 100 A.D. Looks like Yugoslavia all over again. The UN/US will set up a terror state run by our former enemies Al-Qaeda and help ethnically cleanse all others.

Qatar and Saudi Arabia are currently the main suppliers of military equipment to Syria’s armed opposition. However, diplomats say rebels need greater amounts of arms – some of which must be provided by Western countries.

At least the Russians are getting their people out this time. Any Orthodox Christian married to a Russian (and family) are being evacuated from Syria as we speak. Sad days when America fully supports and will aid the ethnic cleansing of Christians in favor of Muslims. Let’s face it, the Syrian Christians don’t stand a chance against the Islamic animals. Too bad we won’t do the right thing protect the Christians. Same story all over the world.

The UN is considering the deployment of 4,000 to 10,000 peacekeepers in Syria as an emergency measure, reports Russian press, citing UN sources. This comes as the US along with over 100 countries voice support for the nascent Syrian Coalition.

The UN is putting together a contingency plan should the Security Council give the go-ahead for involvement in the embattled nation, reported Russian news agency Ria Novosti, citing sources in the UN.

“The problem is that the UN does not have any resources to spare at the moment. We would have to relocate some of the 115,000 peacekeepers currently deployed in different countries and send them to Syria,” an anonymous source told Ria Novosti.

The source went on to say that the team of peacemakers would be made up of observers and civilian units as well as troops. The civilian mission would ensure that basic human rights are being observed in Syria.

UN-Arab League envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi has signaled the need for a peacekeeper mission to the embattled nation to push for a ceasefire between opposition groups and government forces.

“A truce will not hold unless there are observers there to ensure it. I think that it requires the deployment of a peacekeeping mission,” said Brahimi at the end of November.

In recent weeks the international community has been stepping up rhetoric concerning the Syrian conflict.

Germany and the Netherlands will deploy Patriot missiles on the Turkish-Syrian border at the beginning of 2013 as part of a NATO deal to minimize fallout from the conflict into Turkey.

According to reports the deal also stipulates the deployment of 400 American troops and two patriot missile batteries along the Turkish-Syria border.

NATO has assured that the missiles are purely for defensive purposes and the protection of Turkish civilians. However, with a range of 160 kilometers, fears have been voiced that the Patriot batteries could be used to create a no-fly zone over Syria.

The US also followed suit with Britain, France and the Gulf Arab states, recognizing the new Syrian opposition coalition group as the representative of the country on Tuesday.

The US fears that Syrian President Bashar Assad is preparing to use chemical weapons in the fight against opposition forces. The Obama administration has forewarned grave consequences should Assad deploy chemical weapons.

Russia still insists that a political solution must be found to the conflict “based on the final communiqué of the Action Group jointly approved on ministerial level in Geneva on June 30,” said Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Aleksandr Lukashevich on Friday.

The Syrian conflict has raged for over 20 months and claimed the lives of between 20 to 30 thousand people.

The international community has thus far failed to come to a unanimous decision on a solution to the conflict. The US and other western powers have been supplying opposition forces with “non-lethal aid” and are calling for the removal of President Assad. In contrast Russia believes that the Syrian people should be the ones to decide the nation’s fate through legitimate elections as oppose to outside interference.

This entry was posted
on Saturday, December 15th, 2012 at 8:59 am and is filed under Special Report.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.