> > > IFF you want to posit another URI to denote that body of
> knowledge,
> > > you should be able to, but the architecture should not demand it.
> >
> > Well, I think we've reached an impasse here. I think the
> architecture
> > should absolutely demand it.
>
> Then I guess we're going to have to figure out a way to convert
> all the blank nodes in every RDF graph to URIrefs...
I was speaking specifically about the "document" that would be returned
when doing an MGET (or GET+Meta:); that document should have a distinct
URI.