Why Instagram is Great for Photographers, and Why You Shouldn’t Use It

Today, I’d like to fully retract that statement because, screw those guys for ruining something fun.

First, no one should be surprised that a business looked to monetize its huge number of users. This is how the Internet works: companies get a meteoric rise in user base with no revenue model (exhibit A: Twitter, Exhibit B: Tumblr), and then struggle to figure out how to make money.

But let’s also be honest, while Facebook doesn’t have Google-like revenue, they certainly aren’t poor. They don’t need Instagram to make money – it’s a gateway drug for social media, and a dominant player in mobile. I’m sure they are looking to get a return-on-investment for their $700m acquisition, but seriously guys.

Google also has many properties that don’t make a ton of money. It’s been hypothesized for years that YouTube is a loss leader for them, and even if that has changed, the more significant observation is that the way we produce and interact with content on YouTube has remained fundamentally unchanged. You don’t give up your rights to videos by posting them. Instead, Google has been smarter about figuring out how to monetize the traffic (namely, ads over videos).

But instead of doing something creative like location-based, paid ads in your Instagram stream, Facebook has decided to just appropriate all your images.

Granted, given the huge number of images uploaded to the service, it’s unlikely that your images will be sold to another company. But for professional photographers, the threat is real. And since the GPS coordinates are on the images, it’s so much easier to find location-specific imagery. Want that Disney image? Eiffel Tower? No problem.

At the end of the day, is my life going to be impacted by Instagram all that much? No, but it was a way for me to stay in contact with friends visually, and I had enjoyed it immensely – from the most creative and artistic of images, and from the top professionals to the last mushroom burger Farah (our Client Services Manager) ate.

So for all of the enormous benefits Instagram has as a distribution platform, and as fun platform, the only advice I have for you now as a photographer is to delete your account.

It’s been fun playing with Instagram, but even me, a non-professional hobby photographer will delete my account now. It is not in my interest that somebody else sell my photos. Even if they’re shot with an iphone and an app.

Well said Allen. How discouraging for FB to do something so backhanded and sleazy. We should all have the courage to halp make their $700 million dollar investment bite them in the posterior. Shame on you Facebook.

Maybe this is an opportunity for Photoshelter to make a mobile app that doesn’t grab rights? It might even encourage more people to subscribe… and Photoshelter already has a boatload of pros on board who would embrace the service.

I am guessing that the business plan was always that the images could be sold. We do have an option – add a watermark to your images … not sure how to do that yet (in phone … as it were) . On the other hand, most Instagram images are very bad quality. As for the teenagers – this is a major issue that their photos can now be sold and used in advertising . Question – if you delete the images does Instagram still own all of them?

@Liam and @Patrick – This is definitely something we’re interested in exploring! Please send us your ideas to suggestions@photoshelter.com so we can continue rounding up what our users expect from a PhotoShelter app.

While I certain think the recent changes to Instagram are beyond sleazy, I for one will not be running to delete my account. I didn’t join to be recognized for my work but, more for the fun of seeing what my friends and photographic heros choose to share (most of which have stated they do not make the habit of ‘Instasharing’ their best works ie Ed Templeton, David Alan Harvey, Terry Richardson).

To be completely honest, coming from the perspective of a small-time photog, if one of my images were to be used as a national campaign I would happily reap the benefit of the exposure. Just playing a little devil’s advocate here, I enjoy all your blog posts.

Just recently open my instagram account and found it to be an incredible source of creative images as well as a fun way to make and share images with frinds and stangers. No surprice since is part of FB.
For mobile images you can use an ftp App to upload directly to a folder in photoshelter even if listed on home page.http://ramonlepage.photoshelter.com/gallery/Iphoneography/G0000vTgctQf6bFM/

WARNING: Instagram (wholly owned by Facebook) has a new user agreement… They can now sell your photos to advertisers WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION, and without compensation to you. This is a breach of privacy and security. If you have photos of your children on Instagram, or if you are a photographer posting to Instagram, beware. The only option is to delete your account, you cannot opt out. PLEASE PASS THIS ON.

@Laina Colgan
I don’t remember reading anywhere in the new TOS that stated the user of an image has to credit you as the photograph’s creator. So there would be no exposure to reap outside of your existing network.

Patrick is spot on. A photoshelter app is definitely something that would benefit photoshelter members and non members alike. it would be a great way for users of photoshelter to be mobile and social, as well as for potential customers to interact and view our archives et al.