On 07/27/2010 11:29 AM, divya manian wrote:
>
> The reason I posted here was I think it is practical to have inset
> box-shadow ON TOP OF the image rather than below the image, despite
> what the spec says. I think for image elements inset box-shadow is not
> practical otherwise. inset box-shadow would be of great use if only
> for this issue.
> ...
> My view is, the spec should be altered to allow image to show below
> an inset box-shadow when an inset box-shadow is specified on the image
> element. There is no use-case for the other case where the inset
> box-shadow is behind the image.
That's an interesting point. Perhaps it makes more sense for the
inset shadow to be on top of the content in *all* cases, not just
for replaced elements?
~fantasai