Do Animals Have Rights - Essay Example

Extract of sampleDo Animals Have Rights

These differences do not exclude a person's right to being treated with respect and dignity. Human equal and natural rights are granted merely because we are humans (Regan, 1). However, extending this thinking to animals requires that we examine why they are excluded from the rights that are afforded to human beings. It is not because we perceive them as different. Equality and the moral claim to rights rests not in our willingness to overlook differences, but in our acknowledgement that we have a commonality that unites us into a unique moral class.
The sameness that unites the human race is not born out of physical appearance or mental abilities. We treasure our uniqueness and individuality, but they do not make us the same. The attribute that unites our species as unique is our awareness of our status, well being, and self. On the most basic level of awareness, we can measure our differences in our abilities at math or academic pursuits. Our sameness resides outside our mind's ability to calculate and exists in our unconscious. Equality is a moral ideal that eludes the ability to be stated as a simple fact (Singer, 197). We attribute our sameness to our concept of history, our realization of self-awareness, and the ability to feel the emotions of pleasure and pain. These are the qualities that are ascribed to being unique to the human race by those that would argue that animals do not have rights.
The human concept of histor...
The social structure and survival skills are passed down through generations of an animal society. This is the definition of history that is invoked and kept active by the use of memory. Displays of emotion, as it relates to history, are evident when we observe animal grieving at a family member's death. This is a sense of history as the animal recalls what their relationship meant, and what the coming times will be with the absence of the animal.
The human race is not the only animal on the planet that has self-awareness. All animals are aware of their image, their ego, and the limits of their abilities. A dog will groom itself and have an understanding of what it is and what is not the dog. We do not simply treat our pets well out of a sense of obligation, but because of a common spiritual connection (Cohen, 95). All species of animals demonstrate their self-awareness as they display themselves and understand their role in reproduction. The audible and visual manifestations that an animal creates is an expression of that self-awareness.
The wide range of emotions felt by animals can be illustrated by the grieving process felt at the time of death. Birds and elephants have complicated rituals they perform at the death of a member of their society. Disappointment and frustration is expressed when an animal is faced with obstacles that require problem solving. The close study of animals has revealed societies where kindness, sharing, guilt, grief, and anger are felt ands expressed on a routine basis. Pain and pleasure are often used as uniquely human qualities that are not shared by animals. However, there is obvious pain when an animal is tortured. Animals show obvious signs of appreciation and happiness
...Show more

Summary

Evaluating the rights of animals requires that we first define what equality means as it relates to humans. We do not define human rights simply as our willingness to overlook our differences. All humans have mental and physical capabilities that are diverse and unequal…

Related Essays

Both the so-called fundamentalists and pragmatists of animal rights law often base their arguments on one version or another of rights theory. Still, there are a lot of differences between them on the nature of the rights for nonhuman animals. There are also disputes based on what is morally right and what is the effective strategy for ensuring the protection of animal rights.

The core thesis of Singer’s work is hinged on four suppositions: (1) "Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (2) "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, then we ought, morally, to do it", (3) "It makes no moral difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor's child ten yards from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away", and (4) "The principle makes no distinction between cases in which I am the only person who could possibly do anything and cases in which I am just one among millions in the same position".

What Rights Should Animals Have?
Animal rights as noted by Buzzle (2012) are also called animal liberation. It is a concept to ensure that animal rights are protected as equally as those of human beings. These rights are there to ensure that human beings do not harm, exploit, abuse or kill animals aimlessly.

The main purpose behind elucidating the topic under-consideration includes the violation of these rights witnessed by the humans; consequently, the paper lays stress upon the animals rights and condemns the exploitation of these speechless creatures being exercised by humans at residences, zoos and predominantly in circuses, where “their rights are completely neglected by their owners, by denying their proper food, healthcare and look after necessary for the well-being of these hapless living beings”

This report can be viewed as one side of a discourse with Holland, focusing on the main themes in this area of study. The report will start by characterizing speciesism, including a claim that many individuals are in support of rejecting it, irrespective of the fact that they never fail to sanction what is apparently the obvious effects of rejecting the issue.

When viewed from the rational viewpoint of Singer's well-reasoned argument, it is clear that eating animals is unacceptable The only diet that supports our moral obligation to the world around us is vegetarianism.
This paper will show that meat is not a necessary food source.

He of course is not talking about the rights that shouldn't be discussed, and immediately dismisses those. But the rights that do matter, those are the one that he feels should not just be given to us, but all animals.
If presented with the topic of animal experimentation, even if it was harmless, I believe that Singer would bounce the question back at the asker and ask if they would feel comfortable running the test on a human.

I personally believe that animals have rights too and they should be given due attention. It is not moral to use animals for trivial research purposes. My argument is that of moral significance. If we are sacrificing animals for a

The core thesis of Singer’s work is hinged on four suppositions: (1) "Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (2) "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of

4 pages (1000 words)Essay

Get a custom paper writtenby a pro under your requirements!

Win a special DISCOUNT!

Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger

Your email

YOUR PRIZE:

—

Apply my DISCOUNT

Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!

Comments (0)

Rate this paper:

Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation

Didn't find an essay?

Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to support@studentshare.net