A discussion on the effectivenes of the electoral college system

In California, the score was Clinton When I mentioned that the electoral system prevents corruption, I was referencing that it allows for electors to choose what candidate they elect, which was intended by the founding fathers to prevent wide sweeping waves of corruption that would allow for corrupt politicians to exploit the system and gain office [1].

Well, the balancing of the states restores power to smaller states, which gives those regions their needed advantage. However, three issues arise.

The electoral system may seem to violate democratic principals of equal vote weight, and I will concede that it does in some ways, but the benefits, balancing, and protection it provides to the elections out way this negative result of the electoral system.

Questioning the authority of the E. And it is arguable that the E. Questions arise about whether it is morally or politically right to disobey and refuse to accept the existing rules. In the Eastern rite churches, all the bishops of an autocephalous church elect successor bishops, thus serving as an electoral college for all the episcopal sees.

Please review my sources, as they contain lots of information that backs my arguments. The current system rely on trusting people which are often shown to be corrupt. The popular vote system basically is letting the go of the reins of the election.

However, the electoral college gives advantages to minorities who would otherwise be less useful to candidates. But an objective and desirable analysis of this constitutional problem is not to be confused with using the E.

The ruler Creon holds that obedience to his least command is essential. Only large states will participate, and they will benefit from campaigning and lobbying. Con stated that it is "more trustworthy" to use this "modern system". With this in mind, the rural states, and lower population states in general, will never be visited and be devoid of presidential politics, which makes lobbying impossible.

Senate and even the federal Electoral College itself. Chile had an electoral college established by the Constitutionwhich was used to elect its president in the elections from to A country-wide vote minimizes the smaller states and rural areas largely inhabited by whites.

In the United States, electoral votes are currently required to win the presidential election. One is that to have the election result based on the popular vote in the whole country would bring great practical and logistical difficulties if the vote were close and disputed in a number of the states.

Argentina had an electoral college established by its original Constitutionwhich was used to elect its president. And if it were a popular vote, Wyoming would still be even punier than California in terms of influences to the presidential election.

During the American Civil Warthe Confederacy used an Electoral College that was functionally identical to that of the United States; it convened just once, into elect Jefferson Davis as president. Adherence to that structure is essential even in politics, which is an ongoing process with no eternal answers.

Many Democrats, including the largely Democratic media, comprising ardent Clinton supporters disappointed in her defeat, have called for a change in the U.

It is understood by all that the Declaration of Independence says prudence dictates that the government, and constitutional rules, not be changed for light and transient causes, yet it is right and a duty to change what is improper and undemocratic.

The increased lobbying will allow for the companies in these states to have far higher chances of profit, as lobbying often leads to corporate profit [4].

Within China, both Macau [10] and Hong Kong each have an Election Committee which functions as an electoral college for selecting the Chief Executive and formerly in the case of Hong Kong for selecting some of the seats of the Legislative Council. The issue of the case for and the validity of political or social disobedience has always been present in life and in literature.The electoral college is a system of voting where each state has an amount of electors.

The amount of representatives, plus the 2 senators, for each state will equal the. Read more about the allocation of electoral votes.

Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College.

For this reason, in the following discussion, the word “state” also refers to the District of Columbia. Without the electoral college, there would be no effective brake on the number of “viable” presidential candidates.

Abolish it, and it would not be difficult to imagine a scenario where, in a field of a dozen micro-candidates, the “winner” only needs 10 percent of the vote, and represents less than 5 percent of the electorate.

An electoral college is a set of electors who are selected to elect a candidate to a particular office. Often these represent different organizations, political parties, or entities, with each organization, political party or entity represented by a particular number of electors or with votes weighted in a particular way.

The system can ignore the wishes. Electoral College System Essay - The roots of the Electoral College System can be traced way back to more than years.

A controversial debate on the effectiveness of Electoral College continues over years. A Discussion on the Effectivenes of the Electoral College System The Several Unfair Reasons of the Current Electoral College System. words. 1 page. An Introduction to the Analysis of the Electoral College System 1 page.

An Analysis of the Electoral College System Reforms in the United States. words. 2 pages.