At 04:03 PM 10/1/98 CST, pjohnson wrote:
>I am working on a project the requires the use of Rational's Rose modeling
tool
>and Apex compiler. We are using Rose 98 on Win95/NT to generate the models.
>Once the models are complete we have to move them to Rose Ada on a Sparc for
>code generation, reverse engineering, and builds. This is done because
Rose 98
>does not support Ada95. While at Rational for an Apex course I spoke to the
>Rose 98 sales/marketing support people about an Ada95 addin for Rose 98. I
>thought this was a reasonable request as Rational sells a Win95/NT Ada95
>compiler. The response was unexpected. I was told that they saw no
future in
>Ada and no one used Ada on PCs, just Java, Visual C++, and Visual Basic.
-- Nice of them to tell you what you were not doing...
> They also stated that they knew they had lost the Ada market and saw no
reason >to support Ada on their PC product. I pointed out the Aonix has sold
>75,000-85,000 licenses of ObjectAda and that translates into a fairly nice
>market potential for modeling tools.
-- In this case it sounds like they were correct, they have lost the Ada
market --for PCs. It would take them several years and lots of dollars to
get to the
--point of having a competitive PC Ada product. What you might want to look
--into is integrating Rose with GNAT or ObjectAda.
>Does any one else think that an Ada95 addin for Rational Rose would be a
>good idea. I know Aonix has StP, but as a consumer I like the idea of
choices.
-- You have choices, and it is one of the nice features of Ada that using one
-- vendors design tools and compiler for development, then compiling with a
-- different compiler for production is possible. But don't expect all
vendors -- to support all platforms. Hasn't been true in the past for any
language, and
-- I don't think it ever will.
Robert I. Eachus
with Standard_Disclaimer;
use Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...