RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Proposition 8 might still be the law under the California Constitution

Yesterday, when the US Supreme Court denied the right of California citizens to stand up and appeal for Proposition 8, the state constitutional amendment they voted in place directly, it looked like the lower court’s decision against the amendment would stand.

After all, The Supreme Court has thrown out all of those appeals in Perry v Brown, leaving only the initial trial court injunction against Proposition 8 by George H. W. Bush appointee Vaughn Walker, and a stay against that by the Appeals Court, which will likely be lifted now.

Section 3.5 of the California Constitution says that “An administrative agency, including an administrative agency created by the Constitution or an initiative statute, has no power… To declare a statute unenforceable, or refuse to enforce a statute, on the basis of it being unconstitutional unless an appellate court has made a determination that such statute is unconstitutional.”

Ordinarily this is not a problem, because ordinarily the state Attorney General does his job and defends the will of the people in court. However then-AG Jerry Brown refused to do his job, and his successor Kamala Harris has continued that refusal. So when California lost in the initial trial court, no appeal was made by the state.

And since the Supreme Court has denied the people the right to defend the law ourselves, there is no currently standing appellate court decision against Proposition 8. There is the state appellate court which has heard the matter, but the state Supreme Court in Strauss v Horton ruled the amendment was constitutional.

So if we go by the California Constitution, then Proposition 8 stands. However that’s the state-centric approach. If we look at this from the perspective of the feds, it’s a different story. Harris intends to follow this interpretation as well, and intends to ignore Proposition 8 as soon as the Court of Appeals lifts the stay on the Walker’s injunction, and will direct all counties to obey the injunction. And then that’s it.

Elections have consequences. With a state government willing to fight, there would be options. But when the state establishment is firmly against science, judicial restraint, and the will of the people, then nothing will come of this.

Any fight here will have to come in states with sound leadership. Texas would have a better shot at seeing this through than California ever would, sad as it is to say.