By-passing compile time object exists check

Hey guys, hope someone can help me fairly urgently. I am writng code that will be re-used in various differing applications and basically I want whoever ends up developing software to be able to decide which information to have on their form.
I am simplyfying things by creating some code we can reuse, in this code I am making it write to an object on the form (a series of text boxes) of which some may not exist. I want to be able to skip the VB code-checking facility so that I can compile and run the code and just have an error checker that supresses when data is sent to an object that doesn't exist.

So, to re-word that a bit, I have say 20 pieces of data, when i call a function from my class file I want it to take a reference, look through an object I have already created, locate the record and attempt to write the data to 20 text boxes, whether the developer has put them on the form or not. If they don't appear on the form then I want the code to siply go to the next piece in the record and attempt to move that to a text box.

We all know VB throws a strop and says that if text1 doesn't exist on form1 it wont compile...I wanna supress this and then write code that supresses it at run-time.

Hope soemone can help!
cheers!

PS: I can't change my object that I access the data out of or the way I do that, i can just access it for read or write and I want to do the middle add-in between a form calling one of a small set of methods and the actual code writting out and in upto a hundred pieces of data per record (and some other data manipulation)

Oh, and if someone could tell me what the 'return' line is in code (i.e., insert 'new line' in a string' that would really rock too!)

I couldn't do that plenderj because I do not know which textboxes the programmer will eventually use nor in what order and so i will end up with text boxes with the wrong data in and some of the data is going in combo boxes, checkboxes etc.
I wondered if for the purposes of 'building' that there may be a way to remove all the debugger stuff and force a build with the errors in?
hope there is a way, else I'm writting things in a completely new way lol

1) Change your code such that your procedure takes a list of parameters of type Textbox, which are the textboxes the developer wants you to put the data into. You can reference these textbox parameters in the body of your method. I recommend using this option

See how one of the leading financial services organizations uses Recorded Future as part of a holistic threat intelligence program to promote security awareness and proactively and efficiently identify threats.

Featured Post

Poor audio quality is one of the top reasons people don’t use video conferencing. Get the crispest, clearest audio powered by Dolby Voice in every meeting. Highfive and Dolby Voice deliver the best video conferencing and audio experience for every meeting and every room.

This tutorial demonstrates one way to create an application that runs without any Forms but still has a GUI presence via an Icon in the System Tray.
The magic lies in Inheriting from the ApplicationContext Class and passing that to Application.Ru…

Calculating holidays and working days is a function that is often needed yet it is not one found within the Framework. This article presents one approach to building a working-day calculator for use in .NET.

In this seventh video of the Xpdf series, we discuss and demonstrate the PDFfonts utility, which lists all the fonts used in a PDF file. It does this via a command line interface, making it suitable for use in programs, scripts, batch files — any pl…

This video shows how to remove a single email address from the Outlook 2010 Auto Suggestion memory.
NOTE: For Outlook 2016 and 2013 perform the exact same steps.
Open a new email: Click the New email button in Outlook.
Start typing the address: …