Dan M Link letter to Thomas Marshall 1923 May 2

May 2, 1923. Hon. Thomas R. Marshall, Washington, D.C. My Dear Marshall :- I have mailed you under separate cover report in the Herrin matter. One of them is a private memorandum dealing with personal and political matters. I doubt this report will meet your expectations It may be too concise; it may be too prolix, and it may not be sufficiently informative. I would thank you for your candid opinion. The two newspapers wrapped with the report were sent in their original form because it was impossible to clip the articles referred to. I did not attempt a review of the evidence at the two trials, although I went over it in print and with many of the witnesses. There is no controversy over the reason for the acquittals. I was more than ever impressed with the portance of the job of the Coal Commission for war in the coal industry will continue until some solution is found. Sincerely yours,

Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.

May 2, 1923. Hon. Thomas R. Marshall, Washington, D.C. My Dear Marshall :- I have mailed you under separate cover report in the Herrin matter. One of them is a private memorandum dealing with personal and political matters. I doubt this report will meet your expectations It may be too concise; it may be too prolix, and it may not be sufficiently informative. I would thank you for your candid opinion. The two newspapers wrapped with the report were sent in their original form because it was impossible to clip the articles referred to. I did not attempt a review of the evidence at the two trials, although I went over it in print and with many of the witnesses. There is no controversy over the reason for the acquittals. I was more than ever impressed with the portance of the job of the Coal Commission for war in the coal industry will continue until some solution is found. Sincerely yours,