(I couldn't be sure whether there was a difference between 'besides' and 'except' or not.)

36. Against Antiochus.
Adversum/contrā Antiochum.

37. About a thousand men.
Circā mille virī.

38. Around the mountain.
Circum montem.

39. Within the camp.
Intrā castra.

40. Outside the gates.
Extrā portās.

41. Bellow the city walls.
Sub mūrīs urbis.

42. In the power of the enemy.
Penes hostēs.

43. Behind the horsemen.
Post equēs.

44. According to the laws.
Dē lēgibus.

45. Contrary to the laws.
Contrā lēgēs.

46. Adjoining the camp.
Prope/Iūxtā castrōs.

47. As far as his head.
Capite suō/eius tenus.

48. Near the garden.
Prope/Iūxtā hortum.

49. The army was sent under the yoke.
Exercitus sub jugum missus est.

50. It lies under your eyes.
Sub oculōs tuōs jacet.

Latin: Trying to ge back to it. Again. (Again.)Ancient Greek: Hoping to have time to get back to that in the future...Other: Hebrew [native]; English [advanced]; German [advanced]; Palestinian Arabic [beginner]

15. They sailed past the island in a boat.
Prope insulam rate nāvigāvērunt.

16. We sailed as far as Spain.
Tenus Hispaniā nāvigāvimus.

17. They live near the island of Corsica.
Prope insulam Corsicae habitant.
(Or should it be "Corsicam insulam"? I'm not sure if the form "the island of X" exists in Latin or not.)

18. He did this in sight of all.
In conspectū omnium hoc fēcit.

19. I did this because of my friendship towards you.
Hoc fēcī propter amīcitiam meam tibi.

20. Were you not going towards the city?
Nōnne ad urbem ībās?

21. Men who live underground.
Virī quī sub terrā habitant.

22. He led an army over the mountains against the enemy.
Exercitum super montēs contrā hostēs dūxit.

23. After the battle they were killed outside the city walls in the presence of their friends.
Post pugnam interfectī sunt extrā mūrōs urbis cōram amīcīs suīs.

24. Before daybreak they came close to (under) the walls of the town.
Ante primam lūcem sub mūrōs oppidī vēniērunt.

25. I killed him before these things, not on account of them.
Eum ante hās rēs interfēcī, nōn ob/propter eās.

Latin: Trying to ge back to it. Again. (Again.)Ancient Greek: Hoping to have time to get back to that in the future...Other: Hebrew [native]; English [advanced]; German [advanced]; Palestinian Arabic [beginner]

So, after completing the preliminary exercises, I am now deep into the book. Thanks for all who helped: adrianus, Sceptra Tenens, MatthaeusLatinus, Craig_Thomas, Ulpianus, Gregarius and anyone whom I somehow missed. I appreciate it!

I will occasionally post here questions about things that I don't quite understand. This one is from exercise 8 (p.11, p.29 in the PDF):

4. He asked me so often that I gave him the book.

The answer given by the key is:

Toties me rogavit ut librum ei dederim.

My question is: why shouldn't rogavit be rogabat? I understand this as a recurring action, and therefore should be in the imperfect. Am I wrong here?

Latin: Trying to ge back to it. Again. (Again.)Ancient Greek: Hoping to have time to get back to that in the future...Other: Hebrew [native]; English [advanced]; German [advanced]; Palestinian Arabic [beginner]

I would suggest this: He used to ask [/he asked] for the book so many times that I used to give it to me. [imperfect tense and uncompleted action]
He asked me so many times [perfect tense and completed action]that I gave it to me.

I would suggest this: He used to ask [/he asked] for the book so many times that I used to give it to him. [imperfect tense and uncompleted action]
He asked me so many times [perfect tense and completed action seen as a whole] that I [finally] gave the book to him.

It seems to me that the key is wrong in this one here, from exercise 10 (p. 13, p. 31 in the PDF):

10. He was so hurt that he died.

And the answer given is:

Adeo laesus est ut mortuus sit.

Wouldn't it make more sense to use moreretur or mortuus fuerit, since the original is in the past tense?

Latin: Trying to ge back to it. Again. (Again.)Ancient Greek: Hoping to have time to get back to that in the future...Other: Hebrew [native]; English [advanced]; German [advanced]; Palestinian Arabic [beginner]

Moreretur is fine, but not mortuus fuerit. But, the perfect subjunctive, mortuus sit, is also fine - Adler would say that it referred to something that recently happened. "He has (just recently) been so hurt that he has died".

Sceptra Tenens wrote:Moreretur is fine, but not mortuus fuerit. But, the perfect subjunctive, mortuus fit, is also fine - Adler would say that it referred to something that recently happened. "He has (just recently) been so hurt that he has died".

Yes, I meant the perfect subjunctive. It's confusing because the active is made with the perfect stem +erim/s/...

Latin: Trying to ge back to it. Again. (Again.)Ancient Greek: Hoping to have time to get back to that in the future...Other: Hebrew [native]; English [advanced]; German [advanced]; Palestinian Arabic [beginner]