I get more than a little uncomfortable when individuals fill the roll of the courts. Such actions can easily come back to bite us.

It would be more appropriate for her to say something to the effect of, “While my personal view is that the law is unconstitutional, I’m obligated by my position as Attorney General to uphold the law until it is ruled on judiciously or legislatively. My heart goes out to the couples affected by this law, but by pressing the courts and your legislators; we may work to see this injustice removed.”

If nothing else it could finally lead to pressing SCOTUS to actually make a ruling and not side step the issue via the technicality of standing.

Some still may not like her. But anyone with a minimum of sense will know it is the next cog in the ‘civil disobedience’ machine.