Under a DACA amnesty, American taxpayers would be left with a $26 billion bill. About one in five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one in seven would go on Medicaid. Since DACA’s inception under Obama, more than 2,100 illegal aliens have been kicked off the program after it was revealed that they were either criminals or gang members. JOHN BINDER

"This is a wall of shame and we don't want any part of it," Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, said in a statement. "Immigrant stories are the history of America and this is a nightmare."

The announcement of the proposal came on Monday, three days after the U.S. Customs and Border Protection requested proposals for "border wall prototypes."

Assembly Bill 946 would require the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System – the two largest public pension funds in the nation, with investments of $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively – to liquidate investments in any company involved with the wall's construction within a year. It would also require the pension-fund management to report a list of those companies to the Legislature.

Messages to state GOP lawmakers seeking comment were not returned Monday afternoon.

The proposal will be carried by Ting and Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, D-San Diego, and Eduardo Garcia, D-Coachella.

If the bill passes, it will discourage California contractors from bidding on wall construction. That means a loss of hundreds of jobs – many of which would go to both immigrants and illegal aliens. Instead, those companies involved in successful bidding on the wall could bring in workers from other states.

It takes a special kind of idiot to become so slavishly devoted to a political agenda that a politician would harm his own constituents.

The legislation has a good chance of passing, considering the massive advantage in the state legislature by Democrats. What would be California's loss could easily become another state's gain as Golden State politicians look to punish their state because someone in Washington is finally trying to address the problem of massive illegal immigration.

In 24 States, 50% or More of Babies Born on Medicaid; New Mexico Leads Nation With 72%

New Mexico led all states with 72 percent of the babies born there in 2015 having their births covered by Medicaid.

Arkansas ranked second with 67%; Louisiana ranked third with 65 percent; and three states—Mississippi, Nevada and Wisconsin—tied for fourth place with 64 percent of babies born there covered by Medicaid.

New Hampshire earned the distinction of having the smallest percentage of babies born on Medicaid. In that state, Medicaid paid for the births of only 27 percent of the babies born in 2015.

Virginia and Utah tied for the next to last position, with 31 percent of the babies born on Medicaid.

However, according to KFF, some of the nation’s most populous states shared the distinction of having 50 percent or more of the babies born there born on Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In New York, 51 percent of the babies were born on Medicaid.

In Ohio, 52 percent of babies were born on Medicaid.

The Kaiser Family Foundation gathered its data on the number of babies born on Medicaid in each state by surveying the state Medicaid directors.

“Medicaid directors were asked to provide the most recent available data on the share of all births in their states that were financed by Medicaid,” said a KFF report[3].

“About half of the states were able to provide data for calendar 2015 or fiscal year 2015,” said KFF. “Other states generally provided data from 2013 or 2014. On average, states reported that Medicaid pays for just over 47 percent of all births.”

“Eight states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia) reported that Medicaid pays for 60 percent or more of all births in their state,” reported KFF.

The KFF survey said data from Hawaii was not available.

A study published by the journal “Women’s Health Issues”[4] in 2013 looked at births covered by Medicaid in the years 2008, 2009, 2010. The report said it was trying to establish a “baseline” for Medicaid-covered birth before the Affordable Care Act’s—AKA Obamacare’s—expansion of Medicaid kicked in.

“Starting in 2014,” said this report, “some states will extend Medicaid to thousands of previously uninsured, low-income women. Given this changing landscape, it is important to have a baseline of current levels of Medicaid financing for births in each state.”

That study, done by researchers at George Washington University and the March of Dimes, determined that in 2008, 40.08 percent of the births in the United States were covered by Medicaid; and that, in 2009, 43.89 percent were covered by Medicaid.

By 2010, according this report, the percentage of births in the United States covered by Medicaid had risen to 47.75 percent—or 1,805,151 out of 3,780,519 total births.

Another report, published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[5] later in December 2013, looked at the form of payment for births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia that as of 2010 had adopted the 2003 version of “U.S. Standard Certificate for Live Birth.” This certificate specifically asks the mother to say which of four categories the payment for her child’s birth falls into: private insurance, Medicaid, self-pay, or other.

This data, according to the CDC, covered all 2010 births in the 33 states and the District of Columbia, which accounted for 76 percent of all births in the nation in that year. According to the CDC, this data revealed that 44.9 percent of the babies born in these jurisdictions in 2010 were born on Medicaid.

In this 2010 CDC data for 33 states, New Mexico also led with the highest percentage of births on Medicaid—with 57.5 percent of all babies born there that year having their births covered by Medicaid.

In California, Florida and Illinois, for example, 50 percent of all babies were born on Medicaid in the latest year on record.

In
California, illegals can vote: it’s possible and very likely. California’s
automatic motor-voter law all but assures that illegals seeking driver’s
licenses will get a ballot along with their license.

Miscreants
from any corner of the world can register to vote in California online, too. No
vetting, no assurance, no integrity.

Voter
fraud in broken inner city hellholes like Detroit and New York City cannot
compare with the ballot stuffing throughout the once Golden State.

“The lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare
benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty
would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert
Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart
News.”

MEXICO’S
CITY of SANTA ANA, in the ORANGE COUNTY, California should secede and join
Mexico.

The highest taxed state in
the nation is about to pay more in taxes as California Governor Jerry Brown won
agreement from Democrat leaders to push through a long-overdue transportation
bill funded by raising gas taxes and Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) usage
fees.

At a joint press conference
at the Capitol Wednesday, theSacramento Beereports that Gov. Brown acknowledged
California’s roads are pothole-ridden and crumbling, committing to push a
“$5.2 billion road-funding package” through both houses of the legislature,
which will be a tough sell for some moderate Democrats in swing districts.

Brown’s proposal would hike the state’s gas tax and set up a “user
fee” based on a sliding scale tied to a vehicle’s value.

TheLos Angeles Timesis reporting that the proposal
includes “a 12-cent-per-gallon increase in current gas excise taxes on Nov. 1.
Future increases would be made through a new tax calculating methodology and
annual inflation adjustments. Those changes would begin in 2019 and would be
fully implemented in 2020.”

These taxes would be on top
of the increased vehicle use fee, which the Timesstates would “average $51.00 per year
based on the value of the car.”

The
sliding scale fee for the right to drive on California’s roads starts at $25
for cars valued under $5,000, and rises to $175 for vehicles whose value
exceeds $60,000. All electric vehicle owners will be billed $100 — a huge
opt-out for those who pay zero gas taxes while driving very expensive cars.

Brown’s
plan also includes money to expand public transit, which is sure to be
unpopular when the roads are in such a poor state of repair.

The Times adds that Gov. Brown is
pushing the plan as a “pay-as-you-go proposal,” but most Californians are
going to ask why so much money has been wasted on priorities that have nothing
to do with the “public good” – -like free college tuition for illegal aliens;
huge pay and pension increases for public sector unions; and politicians’ pet
projects like the High-Speed Rail Authority.

One bit
of irony: Brown’s transportation proposal includes a constitutional
amendment to guarantee that the legislature does not divert the transportation
funds to any other purpose — even though those safeguards already exist. (They
have been suspended many times.)

The San Diego Union-Tribunereports that “In 2002, voters
overwhelmingly passed Proposition 42, a constitutional amendment meant to
ensure that motor vehicle sales taxes be used only for transportation purposes
… After such suspensions happened twice, in 2006, voters by an even bigger
margin approved Proposition 1A” — another constitutional amendment that
forces the legislature to repay any funds diverted during a “state
financial hardship” as a loan to the transportation fund.

The
irony is that the Democrats are promising to protect taxpayers from …
Democrats, i.e. from themselves.

Democrat
leaders have given themselves an April 6 deadline to pass the proposal, to
be certain they have ample time to have the package approved ahead of
the June 15 budget deadline.

What
they may not be thinking about is the political impact of proposing a huge tax
increase that will hit the working poor the hardest — the dreaded gas tax —
just before the April 15 tax deadline.

If
Republicans hold the line, every Democrat will have to vote in favor of what is
sure to a very unpopular tax. When former Governor Gray Davis tripled the
“car tax” (aka ‘vehicle license fee’) 14 years ago, he was ousted by a recall
election, and replaced with Arnold Schwartzenegger — who worked with
the Democrat-controlled legislature to rescind the unpopular increase.

Ever since the Oroville Dam
became the symbol ofGov. Jerry Brown’s failureto take care of a basic core duty of
state government— that is, maintaining and expanding infrastructure for the
common good — Californians have been asking what happened to the(Proposition 1) Water Bond money; why the state can
give illegal aliens a free ride to college, but can’t fix potholes ; and
why infrastructure money was spent on pet projects like the California
High-Speed Rail Authority.

Meanwhile, the California
media are treating the suggestion that Brown hasn’t ruled outrunning for president in 2020 — when he would be
82 — as newsworthy.

SHOULD MEXICO DO SOMETHING FOR THEIR POOR OTHER THAN EXPORT THEM TO LOOT AMERICA?

IMMANENT COLLAPSE THE PENA-NIETO
REGIME AND FALL TO THE LA RAZA DRUG CARTELS ON AMERICAN OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS.

More significant still, a
former Mexican official, Jorge Castañeda, threatened to unleash
Mexican cartels onto the U.S. to retaliate for deportations of illegal
immigrants and the construction of a border wall.

“Mexico in a country whose
four wealthiest billionaires control as much wealth as the bottom half of the
population—the 65 million that live in poverty (which includes 13 million
living in extreme poverty)—and where the top 10 percent as a whole accounts for
67 percent of Mexico’s national wealth.”

"Carlos Slim Helu of Mexico was number six on the Forbes list with a net worth of $54.5 billion. Despite a $4.5 billion increase in his net worth from last year, Slim moved down the list from the number four position. All told the net worth of Mexico’s billionaires rose 17 percent in 2016 to $116.7 billion."

Wealth of world’s
billionaires soars amid stock market surge

By Shannon Jones
22 March 2017

The ranks of the world’s billionaires registered a sharp increase
in 2016, with the number rising by 233 to reach a record 2,043, according to Forbes magazine’s
annual survey. This was the first time that the Forbes list of
the world’s richest has included more than 2,000 individuals.

The combined wealth of those on Forbes’ billionaires
list rose 18 percent to $7.67 trillion, a staggering sum, more than the gross
domestic product of all but the wealthiest of the world’s countries. The
immediate impetus for the rise are surging stock prices, which have reached
record levels since the election of US president Donald Trump, and the rising
price of oil over the past 12 months.

More fundamentally,
the increasing concentration of wealth among the world’s richest represents a
social retrogression in which society’s resources are being plundered in the
name of a mad pursuit of private gain.

The wealthiest
individual in the world remains Microsoft founder Bill Gates, whose fortune
rose to $86 billion, an $11 billion increase. Second was investor Warren Buffet
($75.6 billion) and a close third Amazon founder Jeff Bezos ($72.8 billion).
Bezos recorded the single biggest jump in net worth last year, pocketing an
additional $27.6 billion.

Carlos Slim Helu of Mexico was number six on the Forbes list
with a net worth of $54.5 billion. Despite a $4.5 billion increase in his net
worth from last year, Slim moved down the list from the number four position.
All told the net worth of Mexico’s billionaires rose 17 percent in 2016 to
$116.7 billion.

Combined, the top 10 billionaires on the Forbes list
alone took in $558 billion, more than the Gross Domestic Product of Venezuela. Just
eight of those billionaires control as much wealth as the bottom half of the
world’s population, 3.6 billion people, according to Oxfam.

The United States
continues to have the largest number of billionaires in the world, with a
record 565, an increase of 25 over last year. China is next with 319, while
Germany is third with 114. China had the most newly minted billionaires last
year, adding 76.

In impoverished
India, where 13 Maruti Suzuki autoworkers were recently sentenced to life
imprisonment on frame-up charges, there are 101 billionaires, making the
country fourth on the list in terms of the super wealthy. At $23.3 billion,
telecom tycoon Mukesh Ambani is India’s richest man, in a country where the
average wage is just $295 per month.

There are 14
billionaires living in Sub-Saharan Africa, another region noted for its high
proportion of people living in extreme poverty. The richest is Nigerian Aliko
Dangote, ($12.1 billion) chairman of Dangote Cement, Africa’s largest cement
producer.

US President Donald
Trump is 544th on the list, with an estimated net worth of $3.4 billion, based
largely on his holdings in the New York real estate market.

In the United States, meanwhile, the compensation of top
executives also rose in 2016, up from its already obscene levels. The median
compensation of chief executives at the 104 largest US companies rose 6.8
percent for 2016 to $11.5 million, according to the Wall Street
Journal. Twice as many CEOs saw pay increases as pay cuts, with most
of the compensation coming in the form of stock awards.

Top-paid US CEO,
Thomas Rutledge of Charter Communications, pocketed $98.5 million, a 42 percent
increase. Estee Lauder CEO Fabrizio Freda raked in $48.4 million while Nike CEO
Mark Parker nabbed $47.6 million. Caterpillar CEO Jim Umpleby got $18 million
at a company that is being investigated by the federal government for a scheme
involving tax fraud.

These figures provide
a snapshot of the degree to which the world is being plundered by a financial
elite that has amassed wealth on a scale that has no historical precedent. The
growth of these fortunes parallels a process of social destruction in which the
vast majority of the world’s population are being stripped of resources in
order to provide money for tax subsidies to the rich and increases in military
spending.

A large portion of
the world subsists on less than $2 per day. Famine is threatening some 20
million people in Yemen as well as South Sudan, Somalia and northeast Nigeria,
the product of predatory wars stoked by the United States.

In Western Europe the
welfare state set up in the wake of World War II is being dismantled while
Germany and other imperialist powers rearm in preparation for war.

Meanwhile, in the
United States, the already inadequate social safety net is being further
slashed to provide tax cuts for the rich and pay for a big increase in military
spending. Life expectancy in the United States declined for the first time in
23 years in 2015 after decades of stagnant or declining income, cuts in health
care services and other social programs and a burgeoning drug epidemic.

In the United States
for the past four decades, Democratic and Republican administrations have
seamlessly and without interruption proceeded with the dismantling of the
social gains of the working class in order to enrich the financial aristocracy.

This process
intensified with the election in 2008 of Barack Obama, whose administration
made unlimited funds available to bail out Wall Street and, through its
policies of quantitative easing, opened the spigots of the Federal Reserve to
flood money into the stock market.

The policies of Obama
paved the way for the election of the billionaire Trump, the direct
representative of the criminal financial elite. Since the election, the stock
market has reached record levels in anticipation of further tax handouts to the
rich and the dismantling of health, safety and environmental regulations in the
interests of boosting corporate profits.

There is a bipartisan
consensus in the US Congress for an overhaul of the health-care system based on
further restricting access and slashing costs so that more money can be made
available for the military and tax cuts. Both Democrats and Republicans reject
the notion that health care is a social right that should be made available to
everyone free of charge, claiming, “there is no money.”

However, as the Forbes billionaire list
demonstrates, there are resources aplenty for satisfying all pressing social
needs. It is the present irrational organization of society and the
subordination of all aspects of economic and social life under capitalism to
the demands of a rapacious financial aristocracy that is the main stumbling
block to providing for the well-being of the world’s population.

This raises the
necessity for the working class to unite its forces globally for the socialist
transformation of society. This means seizing the wealth of the corporate and
financial elite and placing the major banks, petrochemical, industrial,
transportation and health-care companies under the democratic ownership and
control of the working class. These resources must be employed for the raising
of the living standards of the world’s population and the provision of decent
wages, healthcare, education and housing for all.

CA
HAS THE HIGHEST TAXES IN THE NATION, THE LARGEST ILLEGAL MEXICAN POPULATION,
THE LARGEST MEX WELFARE STATE and HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE NOW BY MEXICAN
GANGS.

The staggering
cost of all that “cheap” Mexican labor:

MEXICANS SUCK IN
MORE WELFARE THAN LEGALS!

“The lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare
benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty
would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert
Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart
News.”

THE STAGGERING CRIME TIDAL WAVE BY THE WORLD'S
MOST VIOLENT CULTURE: MEXICAN

A NATION IN MELTDOWN

MEXICO SERVES UP THE HEROIN
– WHITE AMERICA PERISHES

“Whites had the highest
rate of overdose deaths of any ethnicity, more than double the combined death
rate for blacks and Latinos.”

MEXICO PLANS INVASION TO
EXPAND LA RAZA OCCUPATION!

“More significant still, a
former Mexican official, Jorge Castañeda, threatened to unleash
Mexican cartels onto the U.S. to retaliate for deportations of illegal
immigrants and the construction of a border wall. “

POVERTY

ROBERT RECTOR:Importing poverty….WE

ALSO IMPORT ALL THEIR CRIMINALS

“The
lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare benefits of illegal immigrant
beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive amnesty would be well over a
trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation expert Robert Rector’s
prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance by Breitbart News.”