Elliot Rodger youtube Fangirl Posts hybristophilic Rants About him

So a youtube channel I have found by the name ElliotSupremeLady has some bizarre uploads of a young attractive girl heaping hero worship and professing her undying love for the deceased mass murderer. This Elliot Rodger youtube fangirl may be a troll, but she seems to act as if she really believes what she is saying. Check out this video where she happily models a shirt plastered with Elliot Rodgers face on it.

The about section of her youtube channel reads as follows:

I am dedicated to loving, remembering and understanding Elliot Rodger. This Is a place where he will be loved, accepted and understood. Just like he wanted in life. I wish he knew how loved he was…

•—————)*:･ﾟ✧(—————•

May you rest in peace. If there is an afterlife I will find you and love you for all eternity I promise. I am devoted to you.♡

•—————)*:･ﾟ✧(—————•

❕DISCLAIMER: I in no way promote or glorify the 2014 Isla Vista massacre. I DO NOT PROMOTE VIOLENCE. It was sad for Elliot and his victims. Rest in peace to all the victims of this tragedy and my heart goes out to the families of all the victims.

If you want to see murder glorified, you won’t find it here! That’s what television is for.

•—————)*:･ﾟ✧(—————•

All my videos are made with love.♡

╔══╗
╚╗╔╝
╔╝(¯`v´¯)
╚══`.¸.ELLIOT♡

Of course the disclaimer is bullshit. This woman wouldn’t care or even know who Elliot Rodgers was if he didn’t kill people. She is a clear cut hybristophiliac. As long as she isn’t breaking any laws I don’t really care whom she likes but I just wanted to document this so that people can see the things I’ve written about hybristophilia are not exaggerations.

The irony is that this girl, according to Elliots own deranged manifesto would have been precisely the type of girl he hated, and worshipped, simultaneously. In his manifesto Rodgers described being rejected by a blonde girl he secretly had a crush on in the following way:

‘The way I was treated by girls at this time, especially by that evil b**** sparked an intense fear of girls. The funny part of this is that I had a secret crush on [her]. She was the first girl I ever had a crush on, and I never admitted it to anyone.’

In another video titled Sweet dreams with Elliot Rodger this chick goes on a rant about when she sleeps at night and dreams about doing things that a boyfriend and girlfriend might do together with Elliot. Mass murder seems to be quite the aphrodisiac for this girl. this comment was pretty telling…

So… literal deification. For her Elliots death has created the possibility of a literal christ figure, one that she can fuck. this woman is not a simple groupie, but an acolyte, a nun married to her God, who was just some blue pilled idiot who genuinely hated women and any men that they liked instead of him.

Sorry to regurgitate, but people read things by divisions on the internet: What you have to do to get recognized by girls is being aggressive & mean. I predict as more & more of Stockholm Syndrome/hybristophilia becomes more known to the popular, we’re’ going to get more & more defenses of savage female nature: (does retarded mocking voice) “Oh, it comes from 100 to 1000s (which is arguable anyway because there’s been different typos of males who had different methods of fixing. YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER FEMALE COLLECTIVISM – “MALE CLONES” ON THEIR LEVEL) of years ago when males had to be more reactionary.” So this is basically a way to promote the primitive nature of female psychology. While males have the capability of creating futurism, females lack this capability. There’s already trends of whores calling themselves polyamorous & pansexual because they’re trying to make their inability to be civlized seem more fancy. ¶ There’s a really good video called: ‘Hidden Cam Reveals How Women Judge Men! Women’s Double Standard EXPOSED! (+Infield).’ You will see exactly what’s going on. It’s a perfect depiction, especially of how females invert definitions – creepy guys are the good-guys & good-guys are “creepy”. in the beginning, until he starts defending female psychology. ¶ Don’t believe that it’s sympathy by this female (not that Elliot Rodger was a good guy – he was an idiot.). It’s all about novelty. In a culture of females’ addictions to lamer forms of entertainment & experimentation & their bad attention, you’re going to get whores making comparisons of you to “Mtv.” idiots, celebrity losers, & others who inflate their worthlessness & very naive sexuality.

Have you seen the piece that a popular source did: Psychologist Discusses Attaction To Violent Criminals | Good Morning Britain?

Women without men would be ruthless, or even more socially retarded.

Men were violent in the beginnings because they had to deal with the harsh beginnings, not because they wanted to. They had to hunt, discover explore. Male cognition was challenged. However, women didn’t evolve as much because they didn’t have the same mental challenges, & that’s how they’ve gotten to their delusional state now. They just mostly babble, & that’s why the female attraction impulsiveness still commonly remains while men have far transcended that.
There’s lots of dismissing by mistaking past models, when psychopathic traits were more necessary, of evo-psyche for the standard now, yet, when I claim that most of that now, when men have far transcended women in evolution, is ‘artificial masculinity,’ they accuse me of being a believer of “leftist” social constructs, while they’re also willing to share anti-feminist articles that bluntly states that ~75% of male criminals come from single mothers, which is true. ( & female inconsistency & personality disorders is more rampant with the same situation) The main point isn’t even so much about “women doing social constructing”, which is true to a degree, but the main, fundamental point is that women evolved to be delusional. THEY RUIN EVEN DOMINANT MEN, & the reason that is is because of the delusional evolution they’ve gotten, which causes them to think that they’re somehow going to get all these other possibilities that’s not even going to happen.

I think that the mainstream culture is a reflection of demographics in general, so my message to all of you, as more reports like this are sprouting, there’s a little bit of entry in the popular culture as well, so all that there needs to be is more & more reports on female psychology. Think in terms of causing stronger impact by using excessive delivery, unlike the polite faggot (no, not homosexual. Originally, it meant bundle of sticks anyway) giving a mediocre rendition of it D-news (discovery) also did a piece on it: Why Psychopaths Turn Women On.

The insanity was a big factor. All he had to do was flash cash and the Beemer, and daddies movie director credentials, and he would have been swimming in pink. He was just your garden variety thrill killer.

After reading and taking into account your previous posts on hybristophiliacs, I’m starting to wonder whether the attraction that these women have for the likes of Elliot Rodgers, Ted Bundy and Charles Manson is mostly due to the violence itself and the effect it had on our attraction/reproduction dynamics throughout our evolutionary journey, as I’ve already posted about, or to the fact that these men received incredible notoriety after the killings, From the faces plastered all over the media, to the TV specials and books written about their crimes and psychological profiles, I’m suspecting that this kind of fame works as a better aphrodisiac than the capacity for violence as it is a more straightforward and direct path to status (questionable status, but status nontheless), and ultimately status is probably the greatest signal for the capacity of provision and protection.

It would be interesting to see if for instance an average gang member who is in jail for murder elicits the same kind of female attention as a Ted Bundy or a Richard Ramirez would. Assuming that a woman would be aware of both, I believe her lady bits would itch harder for the most notorious of the two. Kinda like how an alchoolic, heroin addicted, eccentric man might be unattractive, but an alchoolic, heroin addicted, eccentric man who happens to be a ROCKSTAR has girls in hysteria and fighting tooth and nail to be with him.

The more I see of these women the more I’m starting to believe that they’re just fame-chasers. How convenient that these hybrystophiliacs only profess their “undying love” for these lunatics when they’re safely tucked behind bars or buried six feet under. One has to wonder how many of them are in it for the thrills and how many are only looking to cozy up to the associated fame. No doubt some of them get a high from the thrill, but I honestly believe that women are as capable of placing themselves in immediate danger as men are in placing women in immediate danger. That is, not fucking likely.

The girl in the video is just too…tidy (for lack of a better word). I just get the impression that, like most women, she’s just trying to distinguish herself from the competition. And in an ever-shrinking world the only avenue she saw fit was to attach herself to a sociopath. You also have to wonder how many women hoping to do the same have attached themselves to “Anti-feminism” knowing that most of the initial associated risks have now been all but mitigated.

♂ HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO NOT BE ANGRY WHEN DISCOVERING THE SPECTRUM OF FEMALE PSYCHOLOGY, RANGING FROM ~0.05%-“`80(+)%, UNLESS YOU’RE A FUCKING TRAITOR? THE FEMALE M.R.A.S WHO TELL US TO “SHUT THE FUCK UP”, WHILE THEY DO THEIR ~50% OF TRUTH FOR SOME NIHILISTIC ENTERTAINMENT ARE AKIN TO SLEAZY PSYCHIATRISTS WHO TRY TO PRESCRIBE YOU PILLS FOR THAT EXTRA MONEY, WHEN YOU’RE SUPPOSED TO EXPERIENCE THOSE BAD REALITIES SO THAT YOU CAN ANALYZE IT FOR WHAT IT IS & DEVELOP HATRED. ♂

Holly shit Bar Bar is still alive and kickin I was in the Marine infantry. I’ve killed a few dudes. after my combat deployment it was way easier to get laid I thought I was their desire for security but maby I was wrong.