It is a book for amateurs to discover the hidden truth of history, reader you must know the italian author is controversial, this book offers an overview of the events of the twentieth century very revealing and surprising … I think it is a must read for those who want to be well informed, the optics is interesting but the content less than what could be expected at times however its interest is always valid.

Berlusconi and the Masonic initiation, as Brother Gioele reminds Brother Silvio, once it has been conferred, is indelible: “Indelible as all sacerdotal and mystical ordination”.
Thus, the GOD speaks of a Berlusconi very different from that to which we are accustomed: an attentive devotee of astrology, a scholar of Egyptian esotericism, someone who elaborates refined designs in esoteric-Masonic code for his gardens in Sardinia and for his funeral mausoleum in Arcore, someone who frequents the international masonic milieu and with close ties, cultivated since the years 1992-1993, in the more conservative Anglo-American laomatics environments. And there is more. Brother Silvio is the founder and the Venerable Master of a personal and personal lodge, the “Lodge of the Dragon”, whose rites are not unrelated to the bunga bunga that so loudly upset the media of the whole world during those days.
Freemasonry is not a monolith, as Brother Gioele explains: it is rather a universe populated by progressives and conservatives, libertarians and neo-aristocrats, oligarchs and democrats, all of them involved in an eternal confrontation-struggle from which the great challenges of modernity, with its enlightened dreams of freedom, equality, fraternity and democracy, but also the nightmares of nazifascism in Europe and successive dictatorships in Latin America or the Middle East.
But, you will ask, and the names? Evidently. It is the first thing that the reader will look for in this endless ocean of pages. And there are names. And more. Very many. Clamorous So many and so clamorous – from Barack Obama to François Hollande, from Angela Merkel to Vladimir Putin, from Giorgio Napolitano to Mario Draghi, just to mention a few of the main ones that appear in Masons – that the first inevitable reaction will be: it is not possible. They will deny it.
Freemasonry always goes in the same direction, which is the knowledge and power, whether material or spiritual.
Power is a word that often comes in your answers. And in Masons, throughout pages and pages, he enumerates, implacably punctilious, the protagonists of that power he is talking about: Merkel, Schröder, Sarkozy, Hollande, Chirac, Mitterrand, Blair, Thatcher; almost all American presidents, except Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, who were not Freemasons but simple paramasons; Deng Xiaoping, Vladimir Putin, and before him Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Stalin and Lenin. And the sah of Persia Reza Pahlavi, Golda Meir and Moshe Dayan, the anti-apartheid leader Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, even a pope who has just become a saint, John XXIII, Gianni Agnelli, Giorgio Napolitano, Francesco Cossiga, Massimo D’Alema …

Without a doubt. The real power is Mason ».
Is there a world leader, at this time, who has not been supported in his ascension by Freemasonry? Who is not a Freemason, or has not been supported by Freemasons, do they have any chance of coming to power?
“Do not. There is no opportunity for anyone who is not personally freemason or is supported by Freemasons (that is, belonging to the category of paramasons of right or de facto) to access the most ambitious and decisive positions ».
Why?
“The modern and contemporary world has been built by Freemasonry, defeating the old ecclesiastical and blood aristocracies. And today its most eminent members control and manage its operation with meritorious ends (democratic, liberal, libertarian, secular, egalitarian and philanthropic) or execrable, as the constitution of new oligarchies of spirit and financial supraordinated with respect to popular sovereignty, which in fact it is thus emptied of substance».

The Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, as well as the Bohemian Club, the Fabian Society, the Pilgrims Society, the Round Table, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Group of Thirty, the Bruegel, the Gruppo Spinelli and others are all tightly controlled by the Ur-Lodges. ”
That is to say?
“They are paramasónicas associations that fulfill functions of purely auxiliary and subaltern nature with respect to the desiderata of the masonic elites properly said”.
That is to say, they do not take a damn decision, although in the meetings of the Trilateral or the Bilderberg they participate opinion leaders from almost the whole world.
“Justly. In spite of the luciferian and mysterious aura that surrounds them, at the official meetings of the paramasónicas societies it is not discussed and nothing that is really important is decided. Societies such as the Bilderberg and the Trilateral, despite being very different from each other in their communicative style.
The “Three Eyes”, attention, has not been limited to generating conservative ideology, oligarchic and neoaristocratic. But to move from theory to facts, from the global to the local, has counted with hundreds of collaborators, more or less eminent, in every corner of the planet.

The Ditchley Foundation was founded with great determination by the freemason David Wills (1917-1999), already at that time an eminent partner of the RIIA paramasonic (Royal Institute of International Affairs or Chatham House) and member of a family of old Freemason customs: the Wills , a British dynasty of rich tobacco importers.
As for the Bilderberg, behind its constitution there was a synergy between internationally renowned masons of the caliber of Bernardo de Lippe-Biesterfeld, Prince Consort of the Queen of the Netherlands Juliana, Henry John Heinz II, David Rockefeller and others with no less important media weight; all of them already more or less operative in the profane sphere (that is, political, economic, media, ideological-cultural, etc.) also thanks to other pre-existing paramasonic societies (especially the Pilgrims Society, the RIIA and the Council on Foreign Relations) and that in general they had been co-opted as initiates into certain and elitist supranational Ur-Lodges. ”

After the tragedy of the First World War, while the Bolshevik Mason Leon Trotski dreamed of a communist Europe, the liberal-moderate freemason Coudenhove-Kalergi led a pioneering project of European unification.
In 1923 the cosmopolitan Coudenhove-Kalergi published his famous Pan-Europa writings13, a manifesto of the political-cultural movement called the International Pan-European Union, founded in 1922 and which in 1926 would hold its first congress in Vienna.
On this movement he himself will write, in terms of ecumenicity, symbolism and typically Masonic spiritual syncretism. Kalergi’s project brought together freemasons with a sincere radical-democratic and socializing vision as well as liberal and elitist freemasons. From 1924, Mason Max Warburg generously financed the Pan-European Movement as well as the publication of Paneuropa magazine. Meanwhile, the book of 1923 – in whose frontispiece appeared the symbol of the Movement, identical to several other emblems of the Rosicrucian esoteric tradition – achieved a great public success, with translations in multiple languages.
Around the Kalergi Movement, over the years, the adhesions of eminent protagonists of politics, diplomacy, law, culture and the economic-financial and scientific world of the entire Euro-Atlantic area (credit agreed for the project was further increased by the establishment of an American Cooperation Committee of the Pan-European Union). We refer above all to influential masons such as Otto of Hapsburg, Hjalmar Schacht, Ludwig Nathaniel von Rothschild, Konrad Adenauer, Rainer Maria Rilke, Paul Valery, Thomas Mann, Stefan Zweig, Carlo Sforza, Paul Löbe, Joseph Caillaux, Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Alexandr Kérenski, Jean Monnet, Aristide Briand, John Maynard Keynes and others of no less importance.

The Vatican as such, especially through the then Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini (archbishop of Milan from 1954 to 1963 and cardinal from 1958, Pope from 1963 to 1978 with the name of Paul VI), since 1937 substitute for the Secretary of State and supervisor of the Vatican secret services, and Francis Joseph Spellman (archbishop of New York since 1939 and cardinal since 1946), Maurice Schumann (journalist, essayist and French politician, founder and first president of the MRP, Mouvement Républicain Populaire, parliamentarian and several times minister), by Giacomo Rumor (lawyer, president of the Chamber of Commerce of Vicenza, one of the protagonists of the economic recovery of the Italian northeast after the Second World War, cousin of Mariano Rumor, Christian Democrat several times president of the Council of Ministers) and many other characters, only from 1942-1943 began to be directly interested in the possibility of some form of unification pol tica and / or economic in Europe.
To carry this out, the Vatican had to reach agreements (in a subordinate position) with the Masonic circles that had been working for a long time on the elaboration of a project for European unity.
The 1958 cardinal conclave thus led on October 28 to the election, and on November 4 to the coronation, to the Mason and Rosicrucian Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli (1881-1963, cardinal and patriarch of Venice since 1953) as the 261st bishop of Rome and Pope of the Catholic Church.
Brother Roncalli received his first Masonic initiation in Istanbul in 1940. In reality, still in 1929, in his correspondence, the future Mason Pope expresses a seemingly fearful and demonizing conception of Freemasonry, fully conforming to the anti-Freemason spirit of many ecclesiastics of the time, exalted by the effects of the Lateranenses Pacts.
The intervention of the Pope in the midst of the Cuban missile crisis of October 1962 was very important. That month undoubtedly represented a momentous moment for the history of contemporary humanity and for the salvific and pacifying role played in that circumstance by the first and unique (at least up to now) pontiff Mason of the Catholic tradition.
As is known, in the days between October 15 and 28, the danger arose that the “cold war” could be transmuted into a “hot war,” with the ensuing nuclear conflict and the possibility of an imminent destruction of the human species. On October 14, 1962, the famous U2 American planes, during a reconnaissance flight, discovered nothing less than Soviet nuclear missile facilities in Cuba, where the regime of Fidel Castro, which had become only in South America, had been in force since 1959. 1960 after a first period of cordial relations with the United States.

It was a very ambitious project of harmony and social inclusion that was categorically opposed by the conservative American, European and supranational oligarchies, represented on their cusps by the Masonic superelitist consortiums we have mentioned several times before. Among them, in addition to the “Compass Star-Rose”, the “Geburah”, the “Edmund Burke”, the “Joseph de Maistre” and the “Pan-Europe”, it is necessary to mention the “Leviathan” (founded in 1910 and refounded in 1918, of mainly Anglo-American composition, with liberal intentions of both right and left, which was among the maximum promoters of the institution in 1920 of the RIIA, Royal Institute of International Affairs, and in 1921 of the CFR, Council on Foreign Relations, which in 1965 underwent a decisive conservative and neo-aristocratic turn) and the “Three Architects” or “Three Eyes” (already operational -not officially- since the beginning of 1967, and officially founded at the beginning of 1968 to counteract the rapid outcome of the war in Vietnam, to determine the election of the new president of the United States, to confront, infiltrate, divert and contaminate the tide of democratic and anti-authoritarian instances of the cultural movement sixties , active since the autumn of 1967, which gave continuity to the previous mobilizations of the sixties; to establish a new oligarchic and technocratic course in the governments of the West and to reinforce and control the evolution of certain extra-western regimes, which were already managed with elitist and authoritarian methods).
Among the martyrs of this new wave of antidemocratic reaction, unfortunately there were two characters who, if they had survived the criminal projects to get them out of the way, would undoubtedly have been able to intervene in a more profound way in their time and in the following decades. We are referring to the freemason Martin Luther King, initiated in the Ur-Lodge “Hiram Rhodes Revels” in February 1957, and (still) not freemason Robert Kenendy, both murdered in the fateful year of 1968.
The protagonist of that first official lunar landing in the summer of 1969 was the Freemason Neil Armstrong, ecumenically affiliated with both the “Three Eyes” (in 1968), and, previously, with the same supranational office where President Johnson worked. «Janus». In fact, the entire latomistic world was invaded by a great enthusiasm and pride for being able to touch with the hand, through the work of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), the posthumous and definitive realization of the thought of Giordano Bruno. And not only that, at a doctrinal level, the homogeneity of space and its physical laws between one planet and another was demonstrated, but, finally, man climbed the first step that would lead him to explore directly infinite worlds in infinite spaces, as Nolano predicted.

Latin American fascist dictatorships represented a golden age for reactionary and neo-aristocratic Freemasons around the world: a dream almost completely fulfilled in the central and South American continent, but which was still banned in the most consolidated Western democracies; a dream (or a nightmare, according to the point of view) that they would have liked to extend, perhaps in softer formats, also to most of the Euro-Atlantic countries. And precisely according to this perspective is why they considered important and strategic the capitulation of Italy and the establishment of a dictatorship of Greek or Latin American style.
Not all the members of the oligarchic Ur-Lodges approved this bloodthirsty and extremist path towards a conservative and neo-aristocratic revolution that in any case everyone wanted, but most of them agreed, or tolerated it without too important reactions (with some another laudable exception), as it is exhaustively referred to in several private Masonic archives.
The case of the Chilean dictatorship was a very special laboratory, which synthesized and condensed throughout its development similar experiences of contiguous authoritarian regimes. What had not been successful in Italy in December 1969 and December 1970.
The president of Chile, elected in September 1970, and in office the following November, was the freemason Salvador Allende, active in the lodge “Union Fraternal” of the East of Valparaiso, son of Freemason Salvador Allende Castro and grandson of that Ramón Allende Padín Huelvo who was also Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Chile.
Allende, on the other hand, had joined the Ur-Lodge “Simon Bolivar”, active in recruiting all over the world the most eminent progressive personalities who resided in or were originally from Latin America. Apart from some protests received from the libertarian brothers of the “Simón Bolívar” in relation to some debatable proposals about eugenics and psychiatric treatment of the alleged sexual deviations, it was very appreciated.
One of the serious historical errors of the Ur-Lodges “Simón Bolívar” and “Christopher Columbus” (who mistakenly believed in maintaining democracy in Chile) was that they did not act with determination and speed to persuade Allende to modify as soon as possible its governance structure, guiding it towards greater integration and complementarity between the public and private sectors, instead of persevering in its position of increasing state semi-monopoly of the forces of production, and mortifying the freedom of enterprise. Another garrafal error was, under suggestion of the same Carlos Prats, the one to affiliate (as much in the “Bolivar” as in the “Columbus”) to the head of the General Staff of the Chilean armed forces, that Augusto Pinochet to whom the own Allende – considering it a loyal brother and a general faithful to the democratic Constitution – he appointed in August 1973 a new commander-in-chief of the Chilean troops, replacing Prats.
There was a third and more catastrophic error on the part of the progressive “Bolívar” and “Columbus” superlogs, which would have had to prevent until the end that Prats and his most important friends and collaborators such as Mario Sepúlveda and Guillermo Pickering – constitutionalist and democratic generals affiliated also to the two offices in question – they delivered their irrevocable resignations in that crucial August of 1973.
With regard to the Pinochet regime, which lasted until 1988-1990, it has often been argued that, in spite of the serious and criminal violation of the most basic human rights, a certain economic development of the Chilean nation would have been allowed in any case. , who was on his knees because of the failed policies of Allende and his allies. Now, apart from the fact that Allende’s policies could have been corrected successively, according to a more liberal-socialist and less state line (the “Simon Bolivar” brothers and the “Christopher Columbus”), it is also necessary to recognize that the allendists were immediately hampered and sabotaged by a whole series of actions destined to bring the Chilean economy to its knees by improper and subliminal means. Without omitting the mistakes of the socialist president.

David Rockefeller and Giovanni Agnelli, however, had their precautions with the brother of the “Three Eyes” Edgardo Sogno, trying not to pronounce his name directly in the report on the coup activities and only advising that senior officers who were suspects withdraw or were transferred to other positions. It was Arthur Schlesinger Jr. who was directly concerned to warn Andreotti and Taviani that it was necessary to give a good lesson to Ambassador Sogno, and alerted the Turin court with the names of Luciano Violante and Vincenzo Pochettino.
As Eugenio Scalfari points out, Andreotti took care to cut the military rearguard of the coup operation; the Piedmontese count had already resigned himself to the possibility of going further.
However, on August 27, 1974, the white coup plotter, member of the “Three Eyes” and the “P2”, Edgardo Sogno, saw how they searched his house. He was indicted and, on May 5, 1976, he was also arrested and taken to the Roman prison of Regina Coeli. Later, strong pressure from Rockefeller, Kissinger, Brzezinski and Agnelli not only freed the coup ambassador but was freed from any charge.

Italian, European and international events of great importance took place in which, obviously, the protagonists of the world Masonic aristocracies played a fundamental and foundational role.
These events have to do with the great geopolitical and energy crises of 1973, 1979 and 1980 (beginning of the war between Iraq and Iran, which will last until 1988), and are linked to the incipient global political-economic globalization projects, elaborated since 1975 and carried out in its first phase in the period 1979-1991.
One of the greatest exponents of the “Three Eyes”, the freemason Henry Kissinger, since September 22, 1973 officially Secretary of State of the United States, a position he had already de facto since 1969 (as a National Security Adviser , to the detriment of the totally marginal role that the official secretary of state had, the freemason William Rogers, to whom Nixon took away any relevant role regarding foreign policy, entrusting them to the favorite pupil of the most powerful and venerable David Rockefeller), played a role fundamental and ambiguous in the military campaign that for almost twenty days convulsed the Middle East.
The Freemason Kissinger, during this brief war, induced the Israelis to use to the maximum and in the best way all the lethal effectiveness of their military apparatus, placing them in the circumstance of showing before the world the rank of war superpower, able to disrupt quickly to the Syrian and Egyptian forces, and even more, to be able to completely destroy the Third Army under the orders of Cairo, which was blocked in desert areas without supplies. It would have been a triumphant victory for Israel and an abysmal defeat for Egypt. But the Secretary of State of the United States and First Vigilante of the Ur-Lodge “Three Eyes” (under the command of Venerable David Rockefeller) forced the Israelis to retire, becoming a great personal creditor of the Anwaral-Sadat regime.
In fact, there is a flagrant and never before explained fil rouge that connects again a whole series of political-economic-military events from 1973 to 1980. There were skillful and refined “white-gloved hands” (which rested in the lap of beautifully embroidered aprons) that determined a series of transnational events according to a calendar elaborated with surgical precision. And in this complex intersection of twisted and luciferian international strategies, at the end of the decade 1970-1980, to the classic confrontation between progressive masonic networks and the reactionary-conservatives (and, in between, independent groups of moderate connotation, sometimes allies of some , sometimes of others), was added, during a brief but important period, also a kind of civil war totally endogenous of neoaristocratic latomistic atmospheres that, during several years, had been led by the superlog “Three Eyes”. This Ur-lodge, at least for a certain time, saw its world leadership within these circuits reduced, exerted without solution of continuity since 1967-1968. To put it better: the «Three Eyes» saw how their political-economic programmatic lines for the West triumphed, already drawn from the early seventies in very reserved lodge meetings, for the peace of the oligarchic brothers of other supranational lodges, lines that they were later made explicit in an official and propagandistic way – through the paramilitary Trilateral Commission – with the manifesto known as The Crisis of Democracy, presented at the Trilateral plenary assembly of May 30-31, 1975 in Kyoto.

To better understand how these events in the Middle East (with global energy and economic relapses) are connected to our main narrative, let’s go back to 1968.
In that year, as a first spiritual and ideological response to the constitution of the “Three Eyes” and the authoritarian coup d’état in Greece (1967), as well as the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Francis Kennedy (1968) – but also to the growing philomaoist and paracommunist tide of different connotation – the circuit of the progressive Ur-Lodges commissioned the freemason John Bordley Rawls (1921-2002, eminent philosopher and politician, at that time a Harvard professor after having taught among others in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, freemason affiliated with the “Thomas Paine” and the “Newton-Keynes”) the drafting of a political document that could be a kind of Masonic manifesto for a libertarian, liberal and socially egalitarian democracy.
In 1976 the Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded to Milton Friedman, another freemason of the neo-aristocratic “Three Eyes.” Between 1973, 1976 and 1979 the three volumes of Law, Legislation and Liberty, another capital Hayekian work, were printed.
With different but convergent nuances, through a wise manipulation of the very concept of liberalism (applied in a Burkean and conservative sense), Nozick’s text, the trilateralist manifesto and the many publications of von Hayek and Friedman, posed the absolute apology of the minimal State, a devaluation and even a demonization of the public powers in general, and their possible function as regulators or economic actors.

They did not need Rockefeller, Kissinger, McCloy, Brzezinski, De Rothschild, Huntington, Cummings, Powell Jr., H. Ford II, G. Ford, H. Luce III, Heath, Giscard d’Estaing, Kohnstamm, Mondale, Marcinkus, Desmarais Sr., Bechtel Jr., Yamamoto, Lee Kuan Yew, Bowie, Laird, Owen, Kiichi Miyazawa, Yasuhiro Nakasone, Lambsdorff, Turner, Colby, etc., to understand the clever plot that had been consummated with the Tories primaries in United Kingdom and the British elections respectively in 1975 and 1979, the Iranian Revolution of 1979, and the American elections of 1980.
George HW Bush, neovice president, tried openly (even too much and in a very suspicious way, according to some, and quite sincerely according to others) to mediate and appease the spirits of the most aggressive and resentful members of the “Three Eyes”, but not he got it.
The first and decisive impulse for a general pacification was given by the pair of British masons Margaret Thatcher and William Whitelaw. To Sister Thatcher, for reasons of neoliberal economic globalization that she and her entourage were beginning to project to apply well beyond the borders of the United Kingdom, it would be convenient for her to have a powerful Masonic pax, at least inside the perimeter of conservative and neo-aristocratic freemasonry.
As for Brother Whitelaw, who had been Thatcher’s vice-premier since 1979, Minister of the Interior and Leader of the House of Lords, as a member of the “Three Eyes” since its founding in 1967-1968 but recently affiliated (1976). to the “Edmund Burke” to which the “iron lady” belonged, was indeed the right person to function as ambassador of peace between the two conservative / oligarchic factions at war with each other.
Thus, under the leadership of Thatcher and Whitelaw, some young and promising Freemasons / Freemasons of the “Leviathan”, accompanied by other more mature and influential, took care of mending the severe inframasonic tears of the neo-aristocratic side.

The logic of the supranational masonic power, especially that which is aristocratically modulated, reasons in terms of divide et impera and coincidentia oppositorum, and, of course, not according to the guidelines of that simplistic thinking with which it is often intended to manipulate opinion. public.
The reaction of some of the fiery Freemasons of the “Three Eyes”, who were not willing to let themselves be simmered by their own enemies-friends of the same oligarchic latomistic circuit, did not wait. Exactly thirteen days after the devastating search against his man Licio Gelli, some of the “brothers of the three eyes” plotted the attack against Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981. According to what we have explained before, it was not just a matter of avenging anti-«P2» action that had taken place a few days before, but to react to what seemed like a force of repeated confabulation, throughout the period from 1978 until the beginning of 1981.

The United Freemasons for Globalization / Global Freemasons project, which had come to light between the end of June and the beginning of July 1981, represented a clear leap in quality for the type of ambitions, premises and compromises of the highest level that the own document established.
The challenge of globalization – and of the creation of a New World Order characterized by free trade in all latitudes – is an important first step to achieve the implementation, at the same time and / or later, of plural and plural parliamentary institutions, of rights political, civil, union, labor universals, etc., for the benefit of everyone and everyone, the progressive democratic masons agreed with the neo-aristocratic brothers in these terms, drawing up a plan for twenty years that contemplated the common obligations and the unitary alliance, with the suspension of any dispute about the basic guidelines.

A twelve point agreement:
1. The commitment to support the reformist action of Deng Xiaoping and his closest allies and collaborators in China, establishing a gradual but inexorable opening to the free market economy and the strengthening of commercial and diplomatic relations with the West, favoring a close collaboration between the People’s Republic of China and Japan.
2. Accelerate the destructuring and liquidation of the USSR as such as much as possible. Objective to achieve by employing, abroad, the war in Afghanistan (started in 1979) and the new Polish pope, Karol Wojtyła, with a propaganda function and a specifically anti-Soviet activity.
3. Accelerate the process of economic and political integration of Europe, maintaining with all a constitutive method for the new community institutions, which would pivot around the preeminence of the economic-financial structures over the policies, the technocratic ones over the electives and those whose composition was designed by each of the national governments.
4. At the same time as the destructuration and liquidation of both the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, to carry out the German reunification and the reunification into a single state formation of the German Federal Republic and the German Democratic Republic, as well as the Ur-Lodges supranational «Pan-Europe» (eminently neo-aristocratic but also with moderate and progressive minority components), «Atlantis-Aletheia» (moderate, with the presence also of neo-aristocratic and democratic-progressive), «Parsifal» (oligarchic), « Valhalla »(oligarchic) ​​and« Der Ring »(oligarchic).
5. To promote, through a surgical intervention, systematic and without scruples (with techniques of discredit that should be thrown against possible antagonistic candidates and that were alien to the agreed masonic pacts) from within both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of the U.S.
6. Favoring in the United Kingdom, also through various sabotages already executed (the split of the Social Democratic Party of March 26, 1981) and by executing within the Labor Party (preserving the leadership of people with little electoral appeal and charisma -Michael Foot, until 1983 and Neil Kinnock from 1983 to 1992, the latter kept artificially and artfully in office despite the three consecutive electoral defeats, to which was added the 1992 against John Major-
7. In France, on May 10, 1981, the progressive Mason François Mitterrand was elected president, thanks to a risky action by the “Three Eyes”, which, before the attack on Wojtyła on May 13 and before the repacification with the Other Ur-Lodges oligarchic (“White Eagle” in primis) in the month of June, was maneuvering on a large scale for what would shortly be formalized as the United Freemasons for Globalization / Freemasons project united by globalization.
8. Gradually carry out, during the 1980s, Operation Condor in Latin America, favoring a gradual return to the democratic and liberal regimes of the different countries involved. In particular, strive to support the brothers Tancredo Neves and José Sarney to resume the democratic and plural course in Brazil, after years of illiberal regimes that were inaugurated with the military coup of 1964. At the same time, create internal conditions and external to get rid of the Argentine dictatorship, elevating the Mason Raul Ricardo Alfonsin to the presidency of a renewed democratic republic.
9.The progressive dismantling of apartheid in the Republic of South Africa, legitimizing the African National Congress and releasing its leader Nelson Mandela (1918-2013, freemason affiliated with the “Arjuna-Phoenix” -the Ur-Lodge that Gandhi founded in 1904- and also to the “Hiram Rhodes Revels” and the “Thomas Paine”), although these objectives were revealed especially slow and laborious because of the resistances and ambiguities of the conservative Freemason Margaret Thatcher.
10. Resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through the progressive involvement of the moderate exponents of Fatah (Palestinian political and paramilitary entity, also commonly called Al-Fatah) and the PLO, Organization for the Liberation of Palestine, in the supranational masonic circles. Also the fulfillment and the concretion of these objectives were very slow because of several factors, which we will talk about below and that we will analyze more thoroughly in another place.
11. Efforts in different political, economic, financial, diplomatic, military, etc., commitments throughout the 1990s – coherent with and complementing those just listed – that have to do with different continental, national areas and regional of the world.
12.For Italy: completely dismantle the so-called Red Brigades and other minor terrorist cells. Social and ideological pacification of the parliamentary and extraparliamentary political confrontation. Dismantling of the “P2” lodge, subaltern appendix of the “Three Eyes” – with the consequent abandonment of Licio Gelli and other “P2” masons involved in the scandal – and encouraging confidence in a new direction Masonic, placed in the figures of the brothers Armando Corona, Giovanni Spadolini, Francesco Cossiga, Beniamino Andreatta, Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, Giorgio Napolitano and others.

The new Masonic pax that underlies the very ambitious project of United Freemasons for Globalization / Masons united by globalization, summarily articulated in the 12 points we have listed, instead of also favoring a salvation in extremis for Gelli and the “P2” decreed his definitive De profundis.
The Venerable Aretino will understand, throughout the summer period and the beginning of the autumn of 1981, that he can no longer count on protection from the very high masonic (supranational) instances that had accompanied him in his formidable rise in the Italian scene, despite supporting little and badly the extraitalian ambitions of the former blacksmith.
On December 10, 1981, the Italian Parliament deliberated the forced disconnection of the “P2” lodge from obedience to Palazzo Giustiniani’s Grand Orient of Italy, as a secret association, while a month and a half later, deepening and extending what that says article 18 of the Italian Constitution on the prohibition of secret associations, the law n. 17 of January 25, 1982.

There is an eminent neo-aristocratic mason who was already one of the main protagonists of the lamentable and neoliberal-Hayekian “privatizations to the Italian” that were projected and carried out between 1991 and 2001: Mario Draghi, who was not by chance so affiliated with the “Three Eyes” as the “Compass Star-Rose”, the “Edmund Burke”, the “Der Ring” and the “Pan-Europe”. The same Mario Draghi that precisely about the desestructuración of Welfare State European (and in fact of all the economic-social disposition of the Old Continent), during the first months of 2012 proposed the following ideas:
Europe is heading towards a recession, and Mario Draghi is happy: he sees “good signs”, God bless him. It has gone mad? Quite the contrary: it merely states that the unprecedented plan of kidnapping national sovereignty in European countries for the benefit of the very powerful financial lobbies of Brussels is moving forward with forced marches. First movement: give oxygen to banks but not to companies, to weaken Southern Europe. Second: to prevent the United States, through the “Fiscal Compact”, from spending on deficits for its own citizens, in order to reinvigorate employment. Final objective, literally: «Structural reforms to liberalize the sector of goods and services and make the labor market more flexible». The only solution would seem, then, to be the privatization of the commons: the same ones that the Italians have tried to defend with the referendums of last June.
Masons in Spain and Portugal
Francisco Pinto Balsemão («Atlantis-Aletheia» and «Rosa-Stella Ventorum»), José Manuel Durão Barroso («Pan-Europa» and «Parsifal»), Pedro Passos Coelho («Three Eyes», «Edmund Burke» and «White Eagle »), Jaime Caruana (« Leviathan »and« White Eagle »), Emilio Botín (« Pan-Europa »), Ana Patricia Botín (« Pan-Europa »and« Edmund Burke »), Mariano Rajoy (« Valhalla »and “Parsifal”), Juan Luis Cebrián (“Rosa-Stella Ventorum” and “Leviathan”), Javier Solana (“Rosa-Stella Ventorum”), Guillermo de la Dehesa (“Edmund Burke” and “White Eagle”). ”

In conversations with Frater Kronos:
To understand what happened on September 11, 2001, it is necessary to begin with the elections in the United States of 1992. The committee of the 14 freemasons that contemplated the United Freemasons for Globalization pact chose as president for 1993 a relatively young paramount democracy that I had gone through DeMolay and other organizations that were contiguous to our circles60: I’m talking about Bill, of course. And we decided that, in order to favor his election, George should not present himself again, thus weakening the Republican front.
-Bush Mr. was introduced again, and in what way …
In effect, and that was the beginning of the problem. Obviously, we got Clinton to win, but George was affected a lot. It soured and got poisoned. And the Cheney, Rumsfeld and company were even more furious than him. And they stoked the fire. In any case, if in 1992 Bill received the ritual initiation in the “Compass Star-Rose”, considered a member of the moderately progressive part, in 1996, besides that in the Ur-Lodge “Janus”, he was offered and then He also granted him the income in the «Three Eyes».
1996 was the year in which Bill Clinton joined the “Three Eyes” and George lost his temper and self-control, getting even more angry than in 1992-1993, because he understood that affiliation as the definitive truncation of his aspirations to to eventually re-present themselves to the Republican Party primaries that same year, with the goal set for the fall presidential elections. And it was also the absolute truncation of the hypothesis, reckless but not impossible on paper, to present as a candidate his son George Jr., who since January 1995 was governor of Texas. Thus, the clash of civilizations and the reconfiguration of the world order was the first ideological manifesto of a coming and lethal Masonic project for the 21st century. A manifesto around which, thanks to the impulse of George Bush Sr., Jeb Bush, Samuel Huntington, Donald Kagan, Robert Kagan, Douglas Feith, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Irving Kristol, William Kristol, Dan Quayle, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle , Karl Rove, Michael Ledeen, Bill Bennett and, with the help of other American, European and Middle Eastern brothers, met the first informal nucleus of the Ur-Lodge that was being constituted the “Hathor Pentalpha”. The second step was the creation of the PNAC paramasic think tank, Project for the New American Century, at the end of the spring of 1997.
Frater Kronos, thinking of the readers, I would like to read in your Italian translation the PNAC Statement of Principles document, made public at the beginning of June 1997.
Our goal is to remind the Americans of these teachings, and to sketch some useful conclusions for the present. For example:
• we have to expand our defense apparatus by investing adequate figures, if we want to achieve our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces with an eye on tomorrow;
• we have to strengthen relations with democratic allies and challenge the regimes hostile to our interests and values;
• we must promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;
• we must accept the responsibility of America-unique and irreplaceable in its role-to preserve and extend an international order favorable to our security, our prosperity and our principles.
This Reagan policy of military force and moral tidiness might not seem so attractive in our day. But it is necessary, if the United States wants to build, on the successes of the last century, the promotion of our security and our greatness in the next century …

I think it is important to confirm that the “Hathor Pentalpha” was born as a “frantic splinter” in the milieu of the oligarchic freemason milieu. We did not agree with his constitution, because he called into question the triarchy “Edmund Burke” – “Three Eyes” – “White Eagle”, and even less with his absurd projects, which, protected behind the screen of an arrogant think paramasónico tank as it was the PNAC, simulated to defend and stimulate the American interests, when their objectives were very different.
-You made the mistake of underestimating the anger and desire for revenge of the Bush clan, the unbridled ambition of Freemason intellectuals like Kagan and Samuel Huntington and the initiative capacity of venomous snakes with aprons like Irving and William Kristol, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and others … People who, with the coming to power of Bill Clinton, had felt expelled from the control room.
I am going to dwell on the issue of who it was and how it was conceived to perfection on September 11. The question deserves that we stop in a meticulous analysis and with all rigor. I suppose we can offer it to the public in the next installments of this large-scale editorial work. However, I can tell readers that Osama bin Laden was originally a freemason affiliated with the “Three Eyes” …
-“Was”? Do you mean that Bin Laden is really dead?
His death has been officially declared. For the moment let’s stick to that version.
– What do you think of the two Bush, George H. W. and George W., on a personal level?
The father was an authentic Mason and a great brother. A refined, intelligent and loyal individual, before he went crazy after 1992. For many years we collaborated wonderfully on many fronts. Then he let himself be upset by resentment and self-centeredness, although in recent years we have reconciled. Of the son, George Jr., I am not saying that he is a cretin, but it is clear that he has never been an eagle. He was the proper mediocre man, at the right time and in the right place, to defend the interests of people like Dick and Lynne Cheney, John C. Bogle, Don Rumsfeld, Riley P. Bechtel, David J. Lesar, the Kristol father and son. , John Bolton …
George W. was the best character available to serve as a screen and spokesman for the fierce and meaningless ambitions of the “Hathor Pentalpha.” The Bush family had also won a lot of money from 2003 onwards, and for George Sr., in addition to the pride of seeing his son in office during two presidential terms, all this was a substantial restitution for his ambitions, frustrated in 1992 , when we prefer Clinton. The compensation was so satisfactory that, in the end, he even allowed himself the luxury of building friendly relations with Bill, throughout the 2000s.
We, in the presidential elections of 2000, supported Brother Al Gore. But the thing ended as you know, with Jeb Bush, who, as governor of Florida, decisively favored the counting of votes for his brother George W. Thus, with Bush Jr. in the White House, the new American and world was inaugurated under the sign of a heretical and uncontrollable Ur-Lodge also for us, members of the old neo-aristocratic masonic guard. And, after the
September 11, 2001, the “Hathor Pentalpha” already had that great foundational event, similar to the Pearl Harbor catastrophe …, which would allow it to start many years of aggressive and brutal hegemony.

As had happened in the past with the creation of the “White Eagle” in response to the excessive power of the “Three Eyes”, is that the configuration of the “Hathor Pentalpha” was the product of discontent and the ambitions of all those who , within their respective Ur-Lodges, they felt disappointed, bitter, not sufficiently valued and gratified in the interregnum of the triarchy “Edmund Burke” – “Three Eyes” – “White Eagle” and throughout that project for twenty years that Masons were united by globalization. But it is also true that, as a whole, the «Geburah», in the years from 2001 to 2006, was the best couple of bloodthirsty domination exercised by the brothers of «Hathor».
It is very true that the “Hathor Pentalpha” used the PNAC as a deforming and deceitful screen. And it is also true that the leadership of this Ur-Lodge was no longer American, more than it could be Middle Eastern or European. If you allow me, I am going to give you some name of some weighty affiliate, from now on, in response to the reflection of Frater K and others here. To the “Hathor”, in 2000, the Sultan of Oman Qabus bin Said Al Said was affiliated with several Omani notables, the Amir of Bahrain Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa and some of his closest relatives and / or collaborators, the Saudi princes of the dynasty of Arabia Abdullah bin Abdelaziz Al-Saud, Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, Muqrin bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, Faisal bin Khalid, Nawwaf bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, Mutaib bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, Muhammad bin Naif bin Abdulaziz Al- Saud, the Iranians Ali Akbar Hashemí Rafsanjaní, Mohammad Momen, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i, Heydar Moslehi, Mahmud Alaví, Valiollah Seif, the emir of Qatar Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, the Israelis Ariel Sharon, David Klein, Stanley Fischer , Moshe Yalon …

The most outstanding aspect of Freemasonry: overcoming differences and religious misunderstandings. The problem is when in private you agree, but in public religious, political and military conflicts are unleashed instrumentally destined to conserve and increase your sectarian power … Or to manipulate the masses, distracting them from claiming their rights with force.

To the list of those attached to the “Hathor” in the Middle East, let’s add some European name. Tony Blair has already been mentioned. But it is also useful to remember the affiliations of, among others, Jan Peter Balkenende, José María Aznar, Aleksander Kwásniewski, Nicolas Sarkozy, Marcello Pera, Antonio Martino, the Turkish Erdoğan, whom we can consider as halfway between the Middle East and the Old Continent. As an aside, the erroneous Mason Erdoğan wanted to be initiated among the “children of the widow” of the “Hathor”, precisely to have more perspective in the domestic sphere regarding his political-military adversaries, traditionally connected with the “Edmund Burke”, the “Leviathan” and the circuits of the ordinary Anglo-American latomy. I also draw attention to the fact that in 2003, Brother George W. Bush, in his position as president of the United States and with a power of maximum influence, wanted to affiliate the “Hathor Pentalpha” with the friend Silvio Berlusconi. , as well as Brother Vladimir Putin would have wanted to admit him in the “Golden Eurasia” around the same time, but later also. Because of the opposition and the vote against some eminent members of the two Ur-Lodges, Berlusconi was never admitted, but he was always considered as a Mason with privileged external relations with some of the brothers of these two superlogies.

Bin Laden, both between 1979 and 1988, and from 1988 to the beginning of the nineties, when the structure called Al Qaeda was founded and implemented in concert with us, was at the service first of the strategies of the “Three Eyes” and then of the triarchy that was formed with the “Edmund Burke” and the “White Eagle”. That is to say, first it lent itself to the armed struggle in Afghanistan, in an anti-Soviet mission. He then became the protagonist of a symbolic representation measured with care, in which his Islamic fundamentalist terrorism played at the international level the same function of destabilization / stabilization that in the seventies and eighties had embodied the red and black terrorisms of national scope. Starting in 1996, and later in an increasingly structured way since the 2000s-
2001 onwards, Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda were removed from our control and captured by the new hegemonic Ur-Lodges, the “Hathor Pentalpha” and the “Geburah”, to fulfill a new function. A staging that needs the mythological and elusive figure of public enemy number one, and its virtually ubiquitous terrorist potential, to set in motion a New World Order in which internal collective security takes precedence over traditional civil liberties and everyday democratic controls … But it was a mythological narrative supported by blatant lies that were thrown into public opinion with coarse arrogance, and that were finally unmasked with great prejudice to the image of the governments of, first of all, the United States and Great Brittany. Lies like that of the weapons of mass destruction that Saddam Hussein possessed: a history at the service of fruitful economic-military operations of short duration and the interest of a few, but tragically self-harm as a whole, and which represented a dramatic decline in world consensus towards America and the western world. The wars and millionaire reconstructions that took place avidly in Iraq and Afghanistan, where chaos now reigns, squandered the consensus and prestige that the United States had conquered in the world after the fall of the USSR.
On the one hand, the failures in postwar management in Iraq and Afghanistan, and on the other hand, the defeat of the Republicans in the midterm elections of 2006, decreed the beginning of the end of this first imperial season that personified the “Hathor Pentalpha”, the «Geburah» and the «Amun».

The hegemony of the “Hathor Pentalpha”, of a crude military style, disappeared in 2006, and since the progressive masons have resigned themselves to playing defensively for thirty years now, we have gone to attack again, a shot made. And by “we” I mean a new batch of dominant neo-aristocratic Ur-Lodges formed by the “Three Eyes”, the “Pan-Europe”, the “Compass Star-Rose” -the latter is always ready to play in all fronts, with great pragmatism-, the “Edmund Burke”, the “Babel Tower”, the “Der Ring” and the “Tao Lodge”.
We want to build our Project for the New European Century, a PNEC in which Europe can be transformed according to the prototype of a new postmodern feudalism, ruled by a Masonic nobility without blood lineage, but rich in spiritual-initiatory shields and with alchemical talent- financial. A prototype that we can easily export later to anywhere, from the West to the East, from the South to the North, as Frater Jahoel would say, who likes these technical expressions of the laotistic tradition, and we will also take advantage of the Chinese oligarchic model, which is similar, and in which the Masonic penetration of elitist and undemocratic cut in the Communist Party is already a proven and consolidated fact.
– What would that plan consist of?
FR: Sapin says he intends to continue to clean up public accounts, but at the same time he says he will not accept the austerity paradigm anymore. Reason why remember that, for next year, will leave the deficit relative to GDP is 4 and some percent, and only in 2017 will fall below the infamous threshold of 3% and that the budget balance will not be achieved before of 2019. En passant, almost with mute, he adds that cuts in public spending are foreseen, over the next two years, of around fifty billion euros. But if cutting fifty billion in public spending in times of recession is not a policy of self-destructive austerity, then what is it? It is a game of deceptive communications that is evident to us, experts in the field: to cover up the authentic austere decisions, tears and blood, a fictitious struggle against austerity is devised and emphasized in relation to the deficit.
All false! Like the performances of Mario Draghi, president of the ECB, and of Jens Weidmann, president of the Bundesbank, who during the day pretend that they fight against the supposed “expansive and accommodating” monetary activities of Draghi, and at night they meet in the splendid headquarters in Frankfurt of the Ur-Lodge «Der Ring», wonderfully agreeing about common deception operations to the detriment of the media, public opinion and the collective interest of European peoples. As an aside, I will say that the reduction in the cost of money to the minimum that Draghi and the ECB worked on favored and can only favor banks and large financial institutions, which, without the slightest effort, obtain large amounts of liquidity, or They invest to buy strategic assets from countries with difficulties because of the real economic crisis, or they profit from the profits of the Treasury bonds of increasingly suffocated countries.

In an impressive symbolic and temporal coincidence, in the same month of April 2013 in which Al Qaeda Iraq changed its name to ISIS / ISIL, the historical standard-bearer and the maximum political scarecrow of the «Hathor Pentalpha», that is, the two-time President of the United States, Brother George Bush Jr., promotes the race for the White House for 2016 of the brother of blood and of the lodge Jeb. “Pentalphian” brother Jeb Bush at the top of the American administration to finally lead a credible “clash of civilizations” against an ISIS / ISIL that he embodies, much better than Al Qaeda and other fake terrorist brands created in vitro masonically, the danger of a radical and horrible fundamentalism, deadly contrary to the values ​​of Western civilization.
For the most sophisticated interpreters of the esoteric-astrological milieu, I draw attention to the fact that on the day of the official inauguration of the supposed caliphate of the contrasted freemason Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, on June 29, 2014, the moon passed in a position special between Cancer and Leo, significantly linked to Jupiter at the end of Cancer. And, finally, how can one not notice the way al-Baghdadi appeared before the public for the first time on July 5, which contained a tribute to the main symbol that abounds in the temples of the “Hathor Pentalpha” of all the world as well as those of the “Geburah” and the “Der Ring”: a large eye without eyelids, engulfed in flames, surrounded by an Oreboros and placed in the center of a pentagram, which is an archetype set for number five . All circumscribed by a triangle also serpentiforme. Number five, the final anagogy of some fundamentalist Islamic assumptions that in reality belong to the most dangerous, bloodthirsty and contrainic Masonic fundamentalism. Piranhas hypocrites and petty, who recruit poor idiots all over the world, attracted by anti-modern and anti-Western fixations.