January 29, 2013 "Information
Clearing House"
-
Documents allegedly "hacked" belonging to UK-based
defense contractor Britam (official
website here) appear to show the company considering an
offer from Qatar to use Libyan chemical weapons in Homs,
Syria in order to frame both the Syrian and Russian
governments. The plan involves using Britam's Ukrainian
mercenaries and Soviet-era chemical weapon shells brought in
from Libya's large, Al Qaeda-linked, Libyan Islamic Fighting
Group (LIFG) controlled arsenals.

The e-mail reads:

Phil

We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris
propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is
approved by Washington.

We'll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin
g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should
have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel
that should speak Russian and make a video record.

Frankly, I don't think it's a good idea but the sums
proposed are enormous. Your opinion?

Kind regards

David

It
should be remembered that this is not confirmed - and there
is most likely no way that it can ever be confirmed.
However, in light of
recent, and continuous attempts by the Israelis and NATO
to justify a military intervention in Syria based on fears
of "chemical weapons," and considering how a nearly
decade-long war and occupation was fought in neighboring
Iraq
under similar and patently false pretenses, every
potential piece of evidence should be taken seriously.

It should also be remembered that during the Iraq War,
British special forces were caught carrying out false flag
attacks, dressed as sectarian extremists in Basra, Iraq, and
shooting at Iraqi policemen. After the British soldiers were
arrested,
the British army attacked the police station they were
being held at to free them. The precedence of Western
nations using false flag operations, including terrorism, to
achieve geopolitical objectives beyond their borders most
certainly exists.

In addition to small arms, heavier weapons are also making
their way through this extensive network. The Washington
Post in their article, "Libyan
missiles on the loose," reported:

"Two former CIA counterterrorism officers told me last
week that technicians recently refurbished 800 of these
man-portable air-defense systems (known as
MANPADS) — some for an African jihadist group called
Boko Haram that is often seen as an ally of al-Qaeda —
for possible use against commercial jets flying into
Niger, Chad and perhaps Nigeria."

Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council
and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting
Group, "met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul
and on the border with Turkey," said a military official
working with Mr Belhadj. "Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the
interim Libyan president) sent him there."

Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya's new
authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and
money for their insurgency against President Bashar
al-Assad's regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

At the
meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included
Turkish officials, the Syrians requested
"assistance" from the Libyan representatives and
were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.

"There is
something being planned to send weapons and even
Libyan fighters to Syria," said a Libyan source,
speaking on condition of anonymity. "There is a
military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks
you will see."

Image: Libyan Mahdi
al-Harati of the
US State Department,
United Nations, and the
UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist
organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG),
addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now
commanding a Libyan brigade operating inside of Syria
attempting to destroy the Syrian government and subjugate
the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is known as
"foreign invasion."

Washington Post's
reported "loose missiles" in Libya are now turning up on the
battlefield in Syria. While outfits like the Guardian, in
their article "Arms
and the Manpads: Syrian rebels get anti-aircraft missiles,"
are reporting the missiles as being deployed across Syria,
they have attempted to downplay any connection to Libya's
looted arsenal and the Al Qaeda terrorists that have
imported them. In contrast, Times has published open
admissions from terrorists themselves admitting they are
receiving heavy weapons including surface-to-air missiles
from Libya.

Some Syrians are more frank about the assistance the
Libyans are providing. “They have heavier weapons than
we do,” notes Firas Tamim, who has traveled in
rebel-controlled areas to keep tabs on foreign fighters.
“They brought these weapons to Syria, and they are being
used on the front lines.” Among the arms Tamim has seen
are Russian-made surface-to-air missiles, known as the
SAM 7.

Libyan fighters largely brush off questions about weapon
transfers, but in December they claimed they were doing
just that. “We are in the process of collecting arms in
Libya,” a Libyan fighter in Syria told the French daily
Le Figaro. “Once this is done, we will have to
find a way to bring them here.”

Clearly NATO
intervention in Libya has left a vast, devastating
arsenal in the hands of sectarian extremists, led by
US State Department,
United Nations, and the
UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist
organization LIFG, that is now exporting these weapons
and militants to NATO's other front in Syria. It is
confirmed that both Libyan terrorists and weapons are
crossing the Turkish-Syrian border, with NATO
assistance, and it is now clear that heavy weapons,
including anti-aircraft weapons have crossed the border
too.

Libya's
stockpiles of mustard gas and chemicals used to make
weapons are intact and were not stolen during the
uprising that toppled Muammar Gaddafi, weapons
inspectors have said.

But also reported
that:

The
abandonment or disappearance of some Gaddafi-era
weapons has prompted concerns that such firepower
could erode regional security if it falls into the
hands of Islamist militants or rebels active in
north Africa. Some fear they could be used by
Gaddafi loyalists to spread instability in Libya.

Last month
Human Rights Watch urged Libya's ruling national
transitional council to take action over large
numbers of heavy weapons, including surface-to-air
missiles, it said were lying unguarded more than two
months after Gaddafi was overthrown.

On Wednesday the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon,
said the UN would send experts to Libya to help
ensure nuclear material and chemical weapons did not
fall into the wrong hands.

And
while inspectors claim that Libya's chemical weapons are in
the "government's" hands and not "extremists'," it is clear
by
the Libyan government's own admission, that they
themselves are involved in sending fighters and weapons into
Syria.

Bottom Line

It cannot be said for certain whether the e-mail allegedly
sent by Britam is genuine, but the West is openly subverting
Syria through the funding and arming of terrorists from
across the Arab World. Terrorists are confirmed to be moving
through NATO-member Turkey, with the Turkish government's
explicit assistance. Heavy weapons are both being supplied
and paid for by the West, and likewise brought across
Syria's borders through NATO-member Turkey.

Despite this, the momentum of NATO's armed, proxy-aggression
toward Syria has been broken multiple times. Threats of a
no-fly zone are waning as NATO's proxies are neutralized
with little left to establish a no-fly zone over. The fear
now for NATO and its various partners across the region,
from Israel to Erdogan in Turkey, to Qatar and Saudi Arabia,
is that there will be nothing left of the so-called "Free
Syrian Army" (FSA) to intervene on behalf of.

With time running out and the Syrian people still stalwartly
defending their nation, it is possible that the desperate
measures described in the alleged e-mail from Britam have
been considered - as the rhetorical groundwork to
accommodate such measures has already been long-ago laid out
by the complicit Western media. The purpose of exposing
this alleged e-mail is not necessarily to accuse Britam, but
to remind readers to be vigilant. And should "chemical
weapons" be used in Syria in an apparent joint
Syrian-Russian operation, Britam, the United Kingdom, and
Qatar should be the first suspects that come to mind.

We ask readers to play a proactive role and click
the "Report link [at the base of each comment] when
in your opinion, comments cross the line and become
purely offensive, racist or disrespectful to others.

In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)