On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:18:05PM +0000, Kenneth Miller wrote:
: I understand the words individually, but when I put them together I
: don't know what it means. For the past thousand years, ever since Rabenu
: Gershom did away with multiple wives, every wife views her husband as
: exclusively hers, to the exclusion of all other women. What is new here?
I went to the original FB entry. See http://j.mp/1hx14En or
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=523833621028062&amp
;id=236564963088264
I believe his point is to explain the gap between Yitzchaq and Rivqa's
marriage, where a child is married off by her father, and post-Rabbeinu
Gershom marriage where there is more symmetry. The piece is parshanut,
not a teshuvah or formal proposal.
He does close with a proposal (tr mine):
It is incomprehensible the morality of society lacks symmetry, but
that's the halakhah. What do they do? In groups that do operate by
halachic principles they just change the rules of the game. ...
It would seem only a solution of the sort of Cheirem deRabbeinu
Gershom would resolve the dilemma. A new taqanah of chakhamim that
would establish that a woman is mitqadeshes the man and makes him
mequdash to her and only her. A taqanah like this is within the
control of chakhamimA: "Kol hameqadesh al daas chakhamim meqadeish".
And this is what we say, "Kedas Moshe veYisrael."
It looks like he just wants a symmetric ceremony as an end in itself.
Zev already mentions that a symmatric ceremony could well rob the actual
deOrais of its effectiveness -- an exchange of rings is not giving her
a shaveh perutah. (In fact, in most cases his ring will be bigger and
cost more...) But that topic has already been addressed in teshuvos.
Tir'u baTov!
-Micha
--
Micha Berger I thank God for my handicaps, for, through them,
mi...@aishdas.org I have found myself, my work, and my God.
http://www.aishdas.org - Helen Keller
Fax: (270) 514-1507

I'm learning Y-mi Shavuos around 5b-6a. The sugya is which se'irim brought
as mussafim atone for which tum'as qodshim. Including the se'irim of YK,
and for that matter, YK itself.
So the mishnayos ask which is for someone who didn't know they were
tamei but found out after they ate / entered the BHMQ (the se'ir
hamishtaleiach), which is for someone who knew before the sin, forgets,
sins and never finds out later (the se'ir bifnim and YK, but it's
only toleh -- there can't be full kaparah because some day he may
be reminded that he did that while tamei or that what he ate was
qodesh and need to bring a qorban). If he never knew enough to know
he's be guilty -- that's the se'irim of YT. Possibly the se'irim of
Rosh Chodesh too, possibly those are for someone who eats tamei qodship,
not qodshim while tamei. Etc... as usual, machloqes ensues.
My problem is that I can't get the gemara to work unless we assume that
they meant that this was the sole role of the se'irim. The whole sugya
depends on keeping the territories separate, as there would be no need
for multiple qorbanos if both addressed the same violation of tum'ah
beqodshim.
And one can even use a sa'ir set aside for Rosh Chodesh for YT, or from
YT to YK, etc... since they're all for the same *general* purpose,
even if the particulars differ.
So I'm wondering, because that would rob the whole avodas YHK of its
meaning bizman hazeh. Why have long piyutim about how the KHG used to
bring se'irim and now it's all lost if the se'irim are to be mechaprim
for a sin we can't possibly violate right now anyway? Isn't the whole
import that they provide kaparah for *everything*, or at least everything
bein adam laMaqom?
And in which case, why wouldn't the 2 se'irim be machaprim all sort of
tum'ah bemiqdash/beqodshim as well, and in any case be necessary even
if the other se'irim covered that whole territory?
Tir'u baTov!
-Micha
--
Micha Berger The thought of happiness that comes from outside
mi...@aishdas.org the person, brings him sadness. But realizing
http://www.aishdas.org the value of one's will and the freedom brought
Fax: (270) 514-1507 by uplifting its, brings great joy. - R' Kook

On 31/10/2013 2:19 PM, Micha Berger wrote:
> So I'm wondering, because that would rob the whole avodas YHK of its
> meaning bizman hazeh. Why have long piyutim about how the KHG used to
> bring se'irim and now it's all lost if the se'irim are to be mechaprim
> for a sin we can't possibly violate right now anyway?
Why can't we violate it? One could go to the Har Habayis while under the
mistaken belief that one is tahor enough for that section, either because
one has forgotten about a tum'ah that occurred (shigegas tum'ah), or because
one is mistaken about the boundaries of the area where that particular
tum'ah is not allowed (shigegas mikdash).
--
Zev Sero A citizen may not be required to offer a 'good and
z...@sero.name substantial reason' why he should be permitted to
exercise his rights. The right's existence is all
the reason he needs.
- Judge Benson E. Legg, Woollard v. Sheridan

R' Micha Berger wrote:
> I saw the 4 sons in standard shenayim sheheim arba format.
> The first two sons try a cognitive way of relating to G-d. The
> one who succeeds in conntecting to the RBSO is the chakham, the
> one who doesnt get it "mah ha'avodah hazos lakhem", is the rasha.
Please allow me to reformulate the question: Why is the first described in
terms of mental abilities, while the second is described in terms of evil
accomplishments?
I had described them as a four-element continuum, with each less interested
than the previous. R' Micha's 2x2 matrix is also reasonable, but you need
labels for both columns and both rows. I see that his first row is
"cognitive" and the second is "experiential", but the columns need labels
too. I suppose the columns would be "successful" and "unsuccessful", and
"successful cognition" can lead to chochmah. But how does "unsuccessful
cognition" lead to rishus?
Okay, perhaps I'm arriving at an answer: Unsuccessful cognition can easily
lead to frustration, yi'ush, and an abandonment of belief. Perhaps the
rasha is not a violent criminal, but "merely" an atheist. Not an agnostic,
by the way, but one who the hagada describes as fully rejecting his
Jewishness.
I had some other words that I was going to write here about resha'im, but
now I'm not going to, because my mindset was to understand "rasha" as
"awful bad person". Perhaps this is indeed the point of the Baal Hagadah:
That one can earn the title "rasha" merely by excluding himself from the
Torah community. I've never been comfortable with that idea, which perhaps
makes it all the more important that I should take it to heart.
Akiva Miller
____________________________________________________________
Do THIS before eating carbs &#40;every time&#41;
1 EASY tip to increase fat-burning, lower blood sugar & decrease fat storage
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5272a4d4f375e24d42504st02vuc

On 10/31/2013 1:16 PM, avodah-requ...@lists.aishdas.org wrote:
> Wed, 30 Oct 2013 From: Micha Berger ...But because he says they lack
> even the theoretical capacity for bechirah, I have a hard time
> understanding how the Rambam could say your seifa about having choice
> about the details in their mission. Could you provide a mar'eh maqom?
> ... Tir'u baTov! -Micha
MN 2:7
We have already explained how the term" angel" is a homonym, and
includes the Intelligences [i.e., angels], the spheres, and the
elements. For all these are engaged in performing a divine command. But
do not imagine that the Intelligences and the spheres are like other
forces which reside in bodies, which act by the laws of nature without
being conscious of what they do. Rather, /t_he spheres and the
Intelligences are conscious of their actions, and choose ( bochrim) and
enact behavior [on the objects of their influence], but **not in the
same manner as we exercise free will and rule*_,*/ which is entirely in
transitory matters. I have been led to adopt this theory by certain
passages in Scripture: e.g., an angel says to Lot :" For I cannot do
anything?" (Breishis 19:21), and telling him to save himself, [the
angel] says, ?Behold, I have accepted your request concerning this
thing" (/ibid./).
[Again:] He (Hashem) says, ?Take heed before him, and listen to his
voice??" (Sh?mos 23:21). These [passages] all teach you that /_angels
are conscious of what they do, and that *they possess will and [the
power of] choice (bechirah) in the province of action granted to
them_,/* just as we have will within our province, and in accordance
with the power given to us with our very existence. Except what we do is
at the lowest degree, and our influence and actions are preceded by
non-action; whilst _/the Intelligences and the spheres_/ are not so:
they **_always perform that which is good; there is nothing associated
with them but the good,_** as we will explain in the coming chapters,
and whatever they have is found in perfection, and continuously in
activity from the time of their coming into being.
--
?Zvi Lampel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: angels and free will MN 2 CHAPTER VII.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 65024 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-ai
shdas.org/attachments/20131031/b65a0872/attachment.doc>
------------------------------
Avodah mailing list
Avo...@lists.aishdas.org
http://www.aishdas.org/avodahhttp://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org
End of Avodah Digest, Vol 31, Issue 184
***************************************
Send Avodah mailing list submissions to
avodah@lists.aishdas.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
avodah-request@lists.aishdas.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
avodah-owner@lists.aishdas.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Avodah digest..."
A list of common acronyms is available at
http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/acronyms.cgi
(They are also visible in the web archive copy of each digest.)