Finnish polling company working for state media YLE gets result they’re looking for: 96% of Finns polled hold negative views on Trump…….

One thing however on these polls, I have never been contacted by one, nor have any of my friends, family, relatives or acquaintances. Also suspicious is need to inquire on earnings and education, as if that has anything to do with ascertaining correct facts on any given subject. Given the high ratio of dumb as door nails Leftists graduating from institutions of higher learning, who fell for the consummate liar Obama, their diplomas matter little. This polling smacks of snobbish elitism and class A Bull Shit.

Poll: Just 4 percent of Finns believe Trump has made world safer

A survey for Yle by Taloustutkimus shows only 4 percent of Finnish people believe Trump has made the world a safer place.

Image: Eetu Pietarinen / Yle

If there is one thing that unites most Finns regardless of gender, income or place of residence it is a cautious view on US president Donald Trump.

Taloustutkimus interviewed Finns on behalf of Yle asking how Trump had impacted a range of issues from global security to environmental protection.

Only 4 percent of respondents said that in their view Trump had made the world a safer place, while 14 percent said Trump had strengthened the US position on the globe. Those with only a primary education or with an annual household income of 10,000 euros or less were most likely to argue that Trump had improved global security. On the other hand, those likely to vote for the Finns Party in the next general election were the most eager to support both claims.

About 70 percent of those queried argued that the US president has weakened commitment to protecting the environment. University graduates, residents of Turku and Tampere and those with a household income of 70,000 euros per year were most keen to agree with the statement. In contrast, half of those respondents who are likely to support a Christian Democratic candidate in the general election disagreed.

A large majority of Finns – 88 percent – also believe that Trump has polarised the discussion on social issues and increased aggressive commenting on social media. The supporters of the Green Party were most likely to concur with this opinion, while close to half of Blue Reform devotees contradicted the statement.

Meanwhile, 5 percent of the respondents said Trump had not had an impact on any of the issues. The support for this statement was strongest among 65-79-year-olds, those in managerial positions and residents in municipalities with fewer than 50,000 inhabitants.

Trump not popular anywhere

Ville Sinkkonen, researcher at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, says the results of the poll reflect Trump’s policy against international co-operation.

During his tenure, the US has withdrawn from the Paris Climate Treaty and the Iran nuclear deal while introducing tariffs on European steel and aluminum.

“Finns can see that ours is a small country dependent on exports. This shows in the poll quite strongly,” Sinkkonen says.

The survey shows that Finns are quite unanimous in their disapproval of Trump, including the supporters of the Finns Party.

“Even though respondents may agree with Trump on a certain issue, immigration for example, this does not mean that they automatically support his whole agenda,” Sinkkonen adds.

According to Sinkkonen, the relatively more positive view of Trump among Christian Democrats is probably based on his support of Israel and his policy in the Middle-East.

He points out that the results of the poll are similar to those conducted in other countries.

“During his term, Trump has been unpopular in Western Europe and globally too.”

A poll by Pew Research Center conducted in 134 countries earlier this year showed a 30-percent approval rate for the current US administration. In contrast, Trump’s predecessor Barack Obama was supported by 48 percent in the second year of his term.

Trump is more popular than Obama only in Russia and Israel, the Pew survey showed.

Taloustutkimus interviewed 1,012 people between 11 and 19 June. The poll’s margin of error is +/- 3 percent.

Donate to Elizabeth’s legal fund here…

Melting pot societies are the only way to secure the individual…

Multiculturalism is a gross failure. Assimilation, where celebrating one’s own heritage but as a full member of the dominant culture, wins.

There Is No Such Thing As White Cultural Heritage. The West’s Legacy Is Open To All…

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

Trending Israeli News…

NAFTALI BENNETT AND AYELET SHAKED TO ADDRESS PUBLIC AMID RESIGNATION RUMORS
Bennett's Bayit Yehudi party is widely expected to pull out of the coalitionKulanu: New elections are inevitable
Chairman of Kulanu's Knesset delegation says government no longer functioning, must be dissolved and new elections held.NETANYAHU: IRRESPONSIBLE TO TOPPLE GOVERNMENT AT ‘SENSITIVE SECURITY TIME’
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the public at 8 p.m. on Sunday as his coalition potentially hangs by a thread.FOR FIRST TIME U.S. OPPOSES UNGA CALL TO RETURN GOLAN TO SYRIA
Nine anti-Israel resolutions given preliminary approval in New York.

GW/CC debunked by premier climatologist Prof.Richard Lindzen

SECULARISM AND RELIGION: THE ONSLAUGHT AGAINST THE WEST’S MORAL CODES

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

Middle East expert Mordechai Kedar: To talk of peace in the Middle East is akin to begging to keep your head connected to your shoulders…

What mainstream Islam really teaches, what they believe…

Trending European News…

Stabber shot by Dutch police targeted Jewish, Christian victims
Syrian assailant who stabbed three in The Hague was seeking Jewish and Christian victims.
A Syrian asylum seeker shot by police officers in The Hague after stabbing three people was looking for Jewish or Christian victims, prosecutors said.Macron: ‘Franco-German Couple’ Will Stop World ‘Descending into Chaos’
Warns Against ‘Nationalism’Populist Italian Mayor Promises to Bulldoze Roma Squatter Camp and Make Them Pay For ItHEZBOLLAH MONEY LAUNDERING HAS A 'SAFE HOME IN GERMANY'
By BENJAMIN WEINTHAL

Daniel Greenfield explains Islam 101:

"Every devout Muslim is an "Islamist". Islam is not a personal religion. It is a religion of the public space. A "moderate" Muslim would have to reject Islam as a religion of the public space, as theocracy, and that secularism would be a rejection of Islam.

Nothing in Islam exists apart from anything else. While liberals view culture and religion as a buffet that they can pick and choose from, it is a single integrated system. If you accept one part, you must accept the whole. Once you accept any aspect of Islam, you must accept its legal system and once you accept that, you must accept its governance and once you accept that, you lose your rights.''

Trending Middle East News…

Yemen's Houthi rebels say they are prepared for ceasefire
Iranian-backed rebels halt drone and missile attacks on Saudi Arabia, say they are prepared for broader ceasefire if Saudis agree.'25 KILLED' AS TURKEY BATTLES SYRIAN FIGHTERS ACCUSED OF “PLUNDERING”
There have been tensions in Afrin over the last eleven months as Kurds accuse some of the Syrian rebels and their allies of stealing their property, invading their homes and abusing locals.ANALYSIS: THE U.S. IS JUGGLING TOO MANY AGENDAS IN EASTERN SYRIA
The problems the US faces is that it is trying to do too many things at once and it has misled most of its allies and partners by speaking out of two sides of its mouth.Islamic Jihad releases footage of rocket launch
Terrorist organization shows off launch of large rocket which slammed into Ashkelon last week.