I'm not holding it against the site that much if the idea has been done before. There's a difference between making something that has the same basic concept of a forgettable site from two years earlier and making the fourth "Medieval Don't Taze Me Bro!" of the day.

what is so bad about this site getting a very high rating? is that why you gave it 1 star? to make sure it gets a lower rating? if that is why you felt this deserves a one star rating than I'm afraid you are the problem.

One reason that this site works so well is that it takes the traditionally negative association of tragic loss of the long "no" and turns it on its head for an emotional outburst of joy by Vader cheering on snow. When that realization instantly clicks in one's mind after opening the ytmnd, it's a hilarious combination of a conceptual gag and visual pun. Hence, ergo, vis a vis, concordantly, one of many reasons it should be in the hall of fame.

so everyone's plan is to combat upvoting with even more extreme upvoting? There's too many little f*ggot kids on ytmnd like fourest who can't think beyond their drooling lip and see that upvoting will ruin ytmnd in the end. If you want to support ytmnd, start making it hard to get a 4 out of you, and rarely a 5. That's what i had to do months ago. Like this site, i gave it a 3 originally because it fit with what i give 3's. That's not a downvote.

It doesn't matter how highly rated a site is: if I like it I am going to five it. Not like downvoting is going to do anything anyways. Even if I was a harsher voter, I think I would enjoy this enough for a five.

Well, when half of the recently created sites are this: http://oldpictureofme.ytmnd.com/ and half of the comments section of decent ytmnds are "ur a n*gg*r jew f*ck f*ggit secks with your grandma 1," I can guarantee you are delusional about the potential of this place. Regular users are in fact the reason this place sucks so bad.

Maybe. But his logic was that, you only four sites you like. But I want to five sites I like...because you know, its there for a reason... Your logic is different, and it makes sense. I probably should four it, but I really like the site and I would feel kind of silly having a fav when I gave it a score of four.

But theres a difference between this and a repost, first off a repost is intentional. This was an unintended remake, and I do mean remake, as the sound is a little better, and the image is a lot better, "regular" users have fav'd complete reposts before, so why can't we just enjoy this thing without PMSing 24/7?

wisdum, did you not read the "every time" part of my post, or did you skip over that so you could have an excuse to continue argueing. In response to your question, you should be able to make a distinction between the concept of "good" and "great". That's 4 and 5. The point of the exercise is to adjust your standards for what is a 5-worthy site so that it doesn't happen too often.

Okay, so maybe I was being a bit of a smart *ss when I rebutted. You know as well as I do at this point that I believe this site warrants a five no matter what you say, so what's the point of arguing with me about it? Just because you don't think the site deserves a 5 doesn't mean I should. And just because I happen to five a lot of sites, doesn't mean I should change my standards. Yay for opinions. And anyway, have you actually looked at my voting lately? I do give out fours and threes sometimes, you know.

Only the individual that is voting on their own behalf can judge the value of the 5. I am not going to tell you how to vote, and you shouldn't tell me how to vote. I mean, sure you can make suggestions, but it doesn't mean I will agree and follow through with what you say. I think my standards are fine. I don't upvote for the sake of upvoting. I vote what I deem as fair. Btw, I have also noticed a decline in quality of sites, but I am not going to punish the good sites for the collective quality of ytmnd.

Oh, and by the way, this site made me and a lot of other people laugh. It was funny, it was creative, it was simple. People aren't "upvoting" it for the hell of it, they're giving it a high rating because it's funny! The rating it has, it deserves.