Or you can stop beign a console kiddie and build a pc rig. Imagine just for a sec what halo 4 would look like with dx11 and tessellation. Add in all the other countless features we pc player shave and bam you have a hit. You sir tell me why it would matter if halo 4 cam pc. Would it really hurt the xbox sales when us pc players already know xbox is wack?

When your working with 6 year old arthetecture what are you gonna do? keep pushing 512 megs of ram o cmon. Anough with this stupid arguement that sony hold some ring of the gos within it. Let me tell you something the cell possessor was the biggest flop I have ever owned. Pleas epeople I dare you name one other gaming computer that uses a cell processor. I dont know of any that do kiddos.

I clicked agree because your first sentence it's true but your reasoning about the Cell is broken. It's clear you have no idea what you're talking about....

The Cell is not a general purpose CPU so it can't work on the PC because it only has one PPU. If you put a Cell on a PC it would be like having a single core CPU doing all the work because you have to program each SPE individually from scratch and PC games aren't optimized to make much use of the CPU. That's why we have implementations like the GPGPU.

PC gamers tend to buy weak CPU but powerful GPUs so PC developers optimize their games to make use of the GPU alone and use GPGPU implementation to make up for the weak CPU.

Cell works on the PS3 and on Super-computers because those are closed environments. PS3 uses special coding for their games (just like every console BTW, that's why we still get good looking games on such ancient hardware) and Super-computers have special software to make use of the SPEs for calculations. Right now every Super-computer in the world uses a CPU based on the Cell if you didn't know.

that's what I always say. The ones that should innovate are the developer not the hardware manufacturer. Sony doesn't even make games, they just buy Studios and give them a budget to make them. Kutaragi is the one that made the PS1, PS2 and PS3 but he is no game developer so he doesn't know what is good for games.

While Nintendo make consoles and games too. Miyamoto is a game developer and he always been present and the first to give ideas when creating new consoles. His experience as a game developer allows him to have a better understanding to what would work better for games (at least for his games). And that's why Sony is now doing this: can't find the article but I remember Sony saying that their first party would have some input while developing their next gen console.