Probably my favorite lazy argument off of DC. "Stafford wouldn't be so good without Calvin"....."Sam Bradford would be so much better if you gave him some weapons".

Quoted for truth. Stafford usually hits at least 5 different receivers a game so its not all Calvin. Don't get me wrong the pair does make each other better but its not at all one sided. As for Bradford I think he would be more productive with better WRs but it looks like he is on his way to a decent year anyway.

__________________
Stafford Sig by touchdownrams the rest of the sig by Sig Master Bone Krusher Avy by King of all avys renji

Take away Megatron and Matt Stafford is still a better QB than Sanchez.
Stafford can simply make throws that Sanchez cannot. Their arm strength isn't similar at all. No way Sanchez throws for 5K last season playing for the Lions.

Bradford needs protection. If they build an Oline in front of him in St. Louis, he's going to win a lot of games for the Rams. I still like how he sees the field and his accuracy. That's more than enough to build a starting NFL QB.

Freeman is the biggest mystery in the NFL right now. Personally I think his confidence is shot. The Bucs are going to be playing against the 21st century version of the old SKins 'Pearl Harbor Crew' secondary,(on Sundays we get bombs dropped on us!), so if Freeman can't find his rhythm against one of the NFL's worst back 4, his future in Tampa may be short.

True dat. And, some receivers that can get separation.

Very little time to throw + receivers that don't get open = recipe for disaster. Welcome to Sam's world.

My list from Page One holds up pretty well imo. I think Ryan/Stafford is debateable and the same could be said of Freeman/Sanchez but I like the look of it. It's really funny to look back to the first ten pages or so and read the criticisms and orders.

Now that I think of it. Freeman had a elite year then fell off his 2nd year. 3rd year , this year, he's been off and on. Looks great against Carolina and NYG. Looks like a 3rd string qb against Dallas and in the 1st half of Washington and until the 2nd half he explodes. Sheesh idk what to think of him.

Im so sincere. Oh and btw you failed to mention Freemans gm last week. Pretty solid.

Read the post again. But agree he played very good. Part of me says he's a bust. Then the other says he's only 24 3rd year as a starter and in his 3rd offense. I guess we can give him time. To me he reminds m of Eli Manning in his 3rd/4th year. Looks like a top 10 qb half the time. The other half is just hard to watch.

Read the post again. But agree he played very good. Part of me says he's a bust. Then the other says he's only 24 3rd year as a starter and in his 3rd offense. I guess we can give him time. To me he reminds m of Eli Manning in his 3rd/4th year. Looks like a top 10 qb half the time. The other half is just hard to watch.

Guess well find out which way he goes

...except that's not what eli looked like his first 4th years. Eli would look good, and then throw a pick to an area of the field without a single giant even close to the ball, or he'd trust his receiver too much n throw him a jump ball that the DBs won. Even "Bad Eli" never looked as bad as Freeman has and Eli was always a great late game QB.

__________________
BK

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcheTen

JPP is a better and more productive player than Brandon Graham

Quote:

Originally Posted by abaddon41_80

Is Shaun Hill a top 10 QB? Definitely not. Is he a top 20 one? Almost certainly.

...except that's not what eli looked like his first 4th years. Eli would look good, and then throw a pick to an area of the field without a single giant even close to the ball, or he'd trust his receiver too much n throw him a jump ball that the DBs won. Even "Bad Eli" never looked as bad as Freeman has and Eli was always a great late game QB.