In every business relationship there is the potential for conflict over contractual agreements or business operations. When such conflicts arise, there is no need to incur the onerous expense and delays involved in traditional litigation. There are readily available alternative dispute resolution procedures that will enable you to resolve your disputes relatively quickly, fairly and cost-effectively.

Resolving international disputes demands special skills, experience and cultural sensitivity. That’s why thousands of attorneys and their clients turn to JAMS. We are a recognized leader in cross-border mediations and arbitrations, with resources wherever you or your clients do business.

Colleges and universities need to manage, resolve and prevent conflict. As a worldwide leader in dispute resolution, JAMS is singularly qualified to provide a comprehensive range of unique and effective solutions for problems facing students, faculty and administration.

The JAMS ADR blog serves to engage our clients, the legal community and the public in a discussion about alternative dispute resolution. As leaders in mediation, arbitration and more, we strive to remain at the forefront of legal developments, trends and news in areas of law that pertain to ADR.

International commercial arbitration is one of the fastest-growing practices at JAMS. With industry leading rules, JAMS is praised for a highly experienced panel with specialties in many key areas, multilingual case management capabilities, and unparalleled service. JAMS specializes in the resolution of international disputes and is one of the largest providers of commercial arbitration in the world.

Make the Most of Your Mediation - The Employment Case

Make the Most of Your Mediation - The Employment Case

Source:
Law.com

Date:
February 4, 2016

Make the Most of Your Mediation –
The Employment Case
By Hon. Lynn Duryee (Ret.)
February 4, 2016
Plaintiff submitted a reasonable
demand far in advance of the mediation.
Four months before the mediation was even
set, plaintiff’s counsel sent his adversary
a 10-page, beautifully written, old-school
demand letter. The letter laid out the facts
and law in support of plaintiff’s claim. It
gave a demand that was aspirational, but
not astronomic. And, most importantly , the
letter was served in plenty of time for all
the defendant decision-makers to review
and consider in advance of the mediation.
The lawyers agreed to exchange all
the information they had well before
the mediation.
The lawyers appreciated that they would
be able to better advise their clients about
the benefits of settlement if each were in
a position to evaluate the case as fully as
possible. Accordingly, they exchanged the
evidence available to them: wage state-
ments, overtime records, emails, names of
witnesses and expected areas of testimo-
ny, as well as current legal theories. This
helped lawyers on both sides start the
mediation feeling fully prepared to discuss
the case with the mediator and with their
clients.
The lawyers cultivated a respectful
relationship with one another.
In separate pre-mediation calls with coun-
sel, each side told the mediator that his
opponent was a “good guy.” Although the
lawyers disagreed on the facts and the val-
ue of the case, they had made a genuine
This article was originally published by LAW.COM
and is reprinted with their permission
1.800.352.JAMS
| www.jamsadr.com
Mediating employment disputes before
legal action is filed gives parties an op-
portunity to settle their differences before
incurring impressive attorney’s fees and
expending valuable effort. Yet, it’s no easy
thing to settle a case before discovery has
been conducted. Here is how one set of
motivated participants successfully set-
tled a pre-filing employment dispute in
four hours.
1.
2.
3.effort to understand the position of the
other side and respect the views of the
opponent. The respect they had for one
another contributed to the professional
ambience of the mediation.
All principals attended the mediation.
The employee and employer were present
in separate rooms, and both came prepared
to speak openly with the mediator. Defense
counsel had not had the opportunity to
meet with plaintiff, and so, with counsel’s
permission, the mediator invited defense
counsel to meet the plaintiff and hear her
story. The plaintiff came fully prepared
to speak about her experience regarding
pregnancy discrimination, while defense
counsel rose to the occasion and listened
carefully and compassionately. This brief
session in itself was one big reason the case
ultimately settled.
The parties maintained momentum by
remaining optimistic about settlement
and making changes to their positions.
Both sides were clear that they wanted to
settle the case, and both were clear that
their number (and not their opponent’s) was
in the fair range. The parties were quite far
apart during most of the negotiations, but
each side continued to make baby steps to
move closer together. Ultimately, each side
offered a bracket, and after brackets were
exchanged, the case settled easily. During
the day, each side remained fully commit-
ted to settling. Neither side threatened to
walk out. Neither side accused the other
of bad faith. Each lawyer greeted the news
about the change in position of his oppo-
nent with optimism. There was a feeling
all during negotiations that settlement
was just around the corner.
This article was originally published by LAW.COM
and is reprinted with their permission
1.800.352.JAMS
| www.jamsadr.com
Early preparation. Excellent briefs. Profession-
al lawyers. Presence of decision-makers. Mu-
tual respect. There’s the prize-winning recipe
for settling a case in just a few hours. •
Hon. Lynn Duryee (Ret.) is a JAMS neutral who
joined after serving on the Marin County Superior
Court for more than 20 years. She presided over
and settled thousands of commercial, contract,
and negligence cases, along with every other
type of civil case filed. She can be reached at
lduryee@jamsadr.com.
4.
5.

Practice Areas

Sign up for email alerts

This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the JAMS website is intended to provide general information about JAMS and an opportunity for interested persons to contact JAMS. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. JAMS neutrals are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of JAMS services. While JAMS endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, JAMS makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. See More