http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
Call it the pathetic period. That time after tax day when we take a deep breath and start glorying over the prospect of a refund. Somehow, we manage to forget that that refund was our money in the first place.

Two professors at University of Michigan have come up with an explanation for such tax docility. And the fact that one of them is a professor of marketing probably gives the whole story away. Their position is a clear one: taxpayers will engage in a very unlovely activity - paying taxes - because it is made tolerable by that great prettifier of unlovelies: clever packaging.

Consider, for starters, a process most of readers have just completed: collecting deductions. When we spend our evening hours wondering about the home office - and what about that costly bookshelf? - that last charitable deduction, those stock market losses or how many kids we have, we are really cushioning ourselves from the pain of the tax take. Every deduction we uncover represents a small consolation.

This, the authors note, is exactly why the government does deliver the most painful punch first, and then moves to the deductions. It's a clever strategy. But it is important to remember that it was not always this way: when the first income tax form was created, in 1913, taxpayers calculated their tax and then reckoned their "super tax", the extra bit they paid in progressivity.

Government has learned a lot since then, and now plays the deductions game like Tiger Woods. And taxpayers have become addicted. So much so that going back to the old system of one simple rate, and few or no deductions is close to politically impossible, as the flat taxers can attest.

Another way lawmakers and the government trick the taxpayer is by finding ways to quantify taxes so they don't seem so high. "During the 2000 presidential campaign, Al Gore derided George W. Bush's tax cut plan on the grounds that the average family would get about enough money to buy one extra Diet Coke a day - about 62 cents," writes Joel Slemrod, an author of the study.

"His framing effort was clear in comparison to referring to the Bush plan as a $1.6 trillion tax cut over 10 years."

For European readers the trillion dollar number is particularly frightening, since it is larger than the scale of tax cuts that could be written in Europe. That, of course, is true because Europe's economies are not as big as that of the US. But few tax debaters on the international scene acknowledge this: they just use the T-word to demagogue for the argument that the cut is large.

Then there is the culture of the refund. Tax preparation firms have learned to arbitrage refunds lost by selling "fast rebates" or "instant rebates", especially to poorer members of society. What they neglect to highlight is that they charge sky-high rates of interest for providing this service, at something close to no risk to themselves. In other words, we treasure our consolation rebate so much that we are willing to pay even more for the pleasure of experiencing it.

But the largest tax marketing success of the past hundred years is that great beast, progressivity. Progressivity is so successful in part because most Americans don't understand it. People tend to confuse their "average rate" with their "marginal rate". Nobody wants to betray ignorance by raising the obvious question: is progressivity fair, or logical?

The real Madison Avenue-style genius, though, was in the term progressivity (instead of the old super tax or "graduated surcharge"). Progressivity sounds magnanimous.

The University of Michigan study provides food for thought on the dangers of the Value Added Tax, a system common in Europe but not in the US. The clever part of the VAT is that VAT taxes are collected at every stage of production, rendering them close to invisible. At the end, there is no VAT breakout, either. Most Europeans think a E5 item is a E5 item, without asking what part of that price is tax.

If you don't mind being manipulated like a laboratory rat, this all may be fine with you. But the marketing game has worked so well that it conceals the hidden economic dangers of our illogical tax apparatus. These days the big question on the economic table is whether the residential real estate market is overvalued, and set for the sort of massive correction equities have seen.

In tax terms, forecaster Brian Wesbury of GKST, the Chicago-based broker, says the answer would have to be yes. That is because homes are about the only area around that are tax-advantaged to the hilt. So citizens have invested (ie borrowed) beyond anything homes' true values can sustain, distorting, perhaps perilously. Alan Greenspan, Fed chairman, reinforced just this point in his testimony yesterday. the bedrock market on which consumer confidence rests.

04/17/02: Special relationships and free trade do not mix04/08/02: Is terror the flip side of globalization?03/20/02 Bush gives aid but seeks results03/13/02 The Danger in policy by numbers02/26/02: States' smokescreen for tax hypocrisy02/20/02: Echoes of leadership against a global threat02/13/02: Jackson Vanik May be a Useful Analogy When Thinking About the Middle East02/07/02: Budgeting for victory: Requiem for a peace dividend02/05/02: The detectives of 1930s pulp fiction had a nose for clients bearing gifts. Sadly, those consulted by Enron did not01/22/02: Allow all American children a decent chance01/15/02: Do not disturb the profit-sharing revolution01/09/02: It is dangerous to elevate a currency as a political emblem if the need for other economic reforms is obscured01/03/02: There is only one way for a free thinker to bring up children 12/20/01: Why America's economy always bounces back12/18/01: When it comes to taxes, Washington lawmakers can learn a thing or two from The Honeymooners12/13/01: Bush opens a new era12/12/01: A flamboyant reversal for the Democratic party12/06/01: Threat of an oil embargo on the U.S. is a bluff11/29/01: Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity?11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts 07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth
06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers05/14/01: Adam Smith in love05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists 05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again. 04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence03/05/01: Fighting the good fight03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up02/27/01: IT's important02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan02/05/01: Crack and Compassion 01/31/01: Debt is good01/29/01: Clueless01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator 01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience' 01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes 12/11/00: So smart they're dumb 12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush12/04/00: The Boies factor 11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election11/09/00: Those powerful expats11/07/00:
What's right for America versus what works11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness10/24/00: The most accurate poll10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right 10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich 10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?09/18/00: First steps to success09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people08/28/00: A reali$tic poll08/21/00: "I Goofed" 08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes