Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation in the subject line of e-mail.

Gastrointestinal Injuries from Magnet Ingestion in Children ---
United States, 2003--2006

Ingestion of nonfood objects, inadvertently or intentionally, is common among young children and also occurs with
older children and adolescents (1--3). Unless the objects are large or sharp, they usually pass through a child's digestive
system without health consequences. However, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has become aware of toy
products containing small, powerful rare-earth magnets* that pose unique health hazards to children
(4,5). Since 2003, CPSC staff members have identified one death resulting from ingestion of these magnets and 19 other cases of
injuries requiring gastrointestinal surgery. This report describes three selected cases and summarizes the 20 cases of magnet
ingestion identified by CPSC that occurred during 2003--2006. Caregivers should keep small magnets away from young children
and be aware of the unique risks (e.g., volvulus and bowel perforation) (Figure 1) that magnets pose if ingested. When
evaluating children who have ingested objects, health-care providers should be aware of potential complications if
magnets might be involved.

CPSC and the respective manufacturers announced voluntary recalls of Magnetix magnetic building sets by Rose
Art Industries, Inc. (Livingston, New Jersey) in March 2006 and of Polly
Pocket magnetic play sets by Mattel, Inc. (El
Segundo, California) in November (4,5). However, other toys also include magnets. CPSC is working with the ASTM
International toy safety standard (F 963) subcommittee to address hazards associated with toys containing magnets.

Case 1

On November 22, 2005, a boy aged 20 months, who had been in excellent health, awoke several times during the
night complaining of stomach pain. During the next 2 days, he ate little, slept more than usual, and had several episodes
of vomiting. His parents thought he had symptoms similar to his father's illness the preceding week. On November 24,
during the boy's morning and afternoon baths, his father noted red blotches and a bluish tinge to the boy's feet and hands.
Concerned about dehydration, his parents offered cool water, which the boy drank readily. He immediately
became lethargic, his abdomen became visibly distended, and he exhibited intermittent loss of consciousness. The boy was taken to an
emergency department, where he went into cardiopulmonary arrest within minutes of arrival. Resuscitation efforts failed, and the
boy died before a definitive diagnosis was made.

A radiograph taken during resuscitation revealed a large object, measuring 30 mm by 6 mm. Because of its size, the
object was thought to be outside the patient. However, at
autopsy, nine cylindrical magnets, 6 mm in diameter, were found
stacked together in his abdomen. The magnets had magnetically joined across two loops of intestine, causing a volvulus (i.e.,
twisting of the bowel) that compromised the blood supply to the bowel and led to necrosis, perforation, and sepsis. The magnets
had become dislodged from an older sibling's toy building set, which included multiple plastic shapes with magnets embedded
in the corners and edges. Although the victim had not been permitted to play with this building set, he might have
found dislodged magnets in the carpeting of the family playroom.

Case 2

On September 7, 2005, a boy aged 2 years, 6 months, who had been in excellent health, doubled over in pain,
began vomiting, and then had diarrhea. The boy seemed to improve through the next week as his vomiting ceased, although
his diarrhea and stomach ache continued. On September 15,
after drinking a large amount of water, he began
protracted vomiting. The next day, the boy's pediatrician diagnosed
dehydration and a suspected bowel obstruction; the boy was
sent immediately to the local hospital.

Hospital radiographs revealed a rod-shaped object in the boy's abdomen. His mother recognized the object as
three magnetic, rod-shaped pieces from his older sibling's building set, which were attached end to end. The boy was transferred to
a health-care facility that had a pediatric surgeon. During laparoscopy the next day, one piece, which had perforated the
cecum, fell into the peritoneal cavity. That piece was recovered by open abdominal surgery; the remaining pieces were located in
the stomach and removed endoscopically. Each piece measured 25 mm by 7 mm. When shown the pieces, the boy called
them "candy." He was discharged from the hospital
after 1 week.

Case 3

On May 5, 2006, while using his teeth to separate magnetic pieces from a toy building set, a boy aged 5 years, 1
month, inadvertently swallowed one of the pieces. The boy's mother became concerned he might have swallowed a button
battery component of the set; she called the boy's pediatrician, who advised her to take him to a local hospital.
Radiographs revealed the magnetic piece in the child's stomach. Doctors advised the mother that the piece would probably pass
normally but that she should monitor the child's stool for up to
5 days. Two days later, the boy told his mother that he had
swallowed another toy, a small metal ball; this did not
concern her.

By May 18, the mother reported that the magnet and metal ball had not passed; the child's pediatrician ordered
another radiograph. Imaging-center staff members reported finding two metal objects stuck together farther along the intestines
and advised that they would probably pass naturally. However, on May 24, the pediatrician ordered another radiograph,
which showed that the objects had not moved. The next day, the mother informed the pediatrician that she had learned of a
fatality that occurred after ingestion of magnets. After consultation with specialists on May 26, an endoscopy was scheduled for
May 31. On May 30, the boy began vomiting and was taken to the specialist's hospital and admitted. During endoscopy on
May 31, the toy pieces could not be removed, and surgery was required. The surgeon removed two disc-shaped magnets, each
10 mm in diameter, from the boy's large intestine and a steel ball, also 10 mm in diameter, from the small intestine and
resected the affected bowel. The patient was discharged on June 2.

Summary

Building sets and toys with powerful rare-earth magnets have been marketed for use by children as young as 3 years.
Among the 20 identified cases of magnet ingestion injury, the patients ranged in age from 10 months to 11 years, 6 months (mean:
5 years, 6 months; median: 4 years, 9 months--5 years); 16 (80%) of the patients were aged
>3 years (Figure 2). Boys accounted for 16 (80%) of the patients. One fatality caused by volvulus, bowel necrosis, and sepsis was identified. Diagnoses in 15
(75%) of the cases included bowel perforations; bowel obstruction and peritonitis each were cited in four cases, and volvulus
was cited in three cases (Table). Of the 14 cases for which such data were available, hospital stays ranged from 3 to 19 days
(mean: 8.7 days); at least five patients required intensive care.

Among the 20 patients, two children each swallowed 15 magnets; the other 18 children swallowed from one (plus
a nonmagnetic metal piece) to nine magnets. In 12 cases, magnets had been dislodged from toy pieces; in three cases,
entire magnetic pieces were swallowed intact. Ten children swallowed magnets from their own toys, three swallowed magnets
from an older sibling's toy, and three swallowed magnets from toys at day care facilities or school. At least five of the
children swallowed magnets or magnetic pieces intentionally, including two who thought they were candy and one who
swallowed three magnets on a dare. Five children had potentially relevant conditions, including autism,
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, developmental delays, and neurologic disorder (Table).

Editorial Note:

Recent improvements in manufacturing processes have made small, powerful magnets inexpensive and
readily available, increasing the potential for exposure of children to magnets in toys and other products. Ingestion of
multiple magnets, or ingestion of one magnet and a metal component attracted to magnets, poses a unique health hazard
(6,7). Although these magnets generally are small enough to pass through the digestive tract, they can attach to each other
across intestinal walls, causing obstructions and perforations. Initial signs and symptoms of injury are nonspecific, leading to
delayed diagnosis and greater injury. Even when caregivers know a child has swallowed magnets, they might assume that such
small pieces will pass normally. On radiologic examination, a health-care provider cannot ascertain whether objects swallowed
are magnetic and whether they are in separate sections of the gastrointestinal tract with tissue between them. To aid
with diagnosis, a compass might be passed close to the abdomen to determine whether an unidentified object in the bowel
is magnetic.§ Once magnetically attached across bowel walls, magnets are unlikely to
disengage spontaneously.

Building sets and other toys containing magnets pose a substantial hazard to children who commonly mouth
objects. Manufacturers of any consumer product containing magnets should take precautions to keep the magnets in their
intended positions within plastic pieces and should consider making larger plastic pieces to minimize the likelihood of ingestion.
Similar injuries have resulted from ingestion of magnetic beads, jewelry, and homeopathic aids
(8,9).

Caregivers should keep products with magnets out of environments where children aged <6 years are playing and be
aware of the unique risks if ingested. Magnets should never be used to emulate tongue or lip piercing. If caregivers suspect a
child has ingested a magnet, they should seek health care promptly. Caregivers also should be aware that children might be
reticent to admit ingestion or unable to describe what they have ingested. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can lead to
serious or fatal outcomes.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of
the date of publication.

DisclaimerAll MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text
into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or
the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables.
An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800.
Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to
mmwrq@cdc.gov.