I am a fierce protector of free expression. Yet if someone directly and specifically used speech violently, they should be put on trial.

So you are saying that Trump should be put on trial then? Good to know. Considering he has advocated for assaulting people and his supporters have. Then he said he wants to expand libel laws so he can sue people easier, even if they are correct.

Ummm The first republican president abolished slavery....Democrats wanted to keep it in.

I know what you're going to say. "They magically switched parties."

Like Robert Byrd. The grand dragon or whatever the fuck he was leader of the KKK was a prominent member up until a few years ago in the democratic party.

LBJ saying "I'll have those Ni****s voting democrat for the next 200 years." Never happened.

Margaret Sanger a liberal darling never said about blacks"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born."

Fucking liberal parasites.

A few years ago as in 50 years ago? He was never a fucking "grand dragon". That picture that is circulating isn't real. And the parties did switch. I am sorry you failed American history in high school and had to resort to the military but the only parasite here is you. Since you aren't right on ANYTHING.

Yeah, whatever. Go to AR15.com, go to general discussions, and see what other military people are saying about you. My names Jinxsters on there. In order to have a tank you have to prove by showing your DD214. I have a tank next to my name dipshit. I just come on here to see what my enemies are thinking/saying.

Your "enemies"? Let me guess, you are on an NSA watch list right about now for being too mentally unstable and want to shoot up a place of free thinking because we are your "enemies". If you aren't on a list, maybe we should just report you to the proper authorities now.

I think it's pretty obvious at this point that Trump doesn't listen to much of anyone.

- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by Orbitus

A few years ago as in 50 years ago? He was never a fucking "grand dragon". That picture that is circulating isn't real. And the parties did switch. I am sorry you failed American history in high school and had to resort to the military but the only parasite here is you. Since you aren't right on ANYTHING.

It absolutely blows my mind that conservatives claim the southern strategy never happened.

Politifact is already on the "Second Amendment" thing. You'll note in the very same paragraph, he adds three more lies about Clinton, and the article also has a Trump senior communication translator advisor spinning the comment.

- - - Updated - - -

You want to link this? Because without a link, I'm just going to say "no she didn't".

Voting is violence now according to mrs paranoid. I think she is crazy too.

In what way? What part of her ideas are "coercion"? I'm quite curious, because I wasn't aware there were any threats or force being used to prevent people from purchasing guns?

I said coercion via bureaucracy. Adding on so many hoops that it reduces gun ownership. Time is a resource and by adding so many trolling tactics to the gun buying process they are trying to create an undue burden on people who want to exercise their rights.

Clinton, Oct. 16, 2015: Now communities have done … gun buyback programs. But I think it would be worth considering doing it on the national level if that could be arranged. Remember I know after the terrible ’08 financial crisis, one of the programs that President Obama was able to get in place was cash for clunkers. Remember that? Getting them off the road. It was partly a way to get people to buy new cars, ’cause we want more economic activity, it was partly a way to get old models, that were polluting too much, sort of off the road. So I think that is worth considering. I do not know enough detail to tell you how we would do it, or how it would work, but certainly the Australian example is worth looking at.

That's all that I was saying. I mean, people on the left say "Hillary's not coming for your guns", well unless she's clarified her position, ( and she may have I might have missed it) when she says that she thinks an Australia-style gun control program is worth looking at, and that program included mandatory gun buybacks, then I think we should take her at her word.