Register to access two of our subscriber only articles per month

Subscribe for unlimited access to articles, in-depth analysis and research from the World Trademark Review experts

What our customers are saying

"World Trademark Report is the best service of its type. No other service reports international case law and law changes faster and more concisely. Keep up the good work."

Mary M. Squyres
Brinks Gilson & Lione
Chicago, Illinois USA

Benefits

Subscribe to World Trademark Review to receive access to the full range of trademark intelligence,
insight, and case law, as well as our guides, rankings and daily market insight delivered to your inbox.

Share this article

Related content

In a recent decision under the UDRP, a WIPO panel has denied the transfer of the domain name ‘neurones.com’ and found that this was a case of reverse domain name hijacking. This case shows that the UDRP’s three-prong test is to be taken seriously, and that a sufficient...

In a recent decision under the UDRP, a WIPO panel has denied the transfer of ‘stages.com’ to the owner of various STAGES marks and made a finding of reverse domain name hijacking. Among other things, the panel was of the opinion that...

The owner of the trademark VENDITA has been denied the transfer of the domain name ‘vendita.com’ under the UDRP. Among other things, the panel noted that the domain name had been registered over nine years before the complainant first used its mark...

Co-Ro Food A/S, the owner of the CTM SUNJOY, has failed to obtain the transfer of the domain name ‘sunjoy.com’ under the UDRP. The panel found that the complainant had failed to establish the respondent’s lack of rights or legitimate interests...

In a recent decision under the UDRP, a WIPO panel has denied the transfer of the domain name ‘ipayments.com’ and went on to make a finding of reverse domain name hijacking, even though the respondent did not specifically ask...