Originally posted by dgtempe
I have heard Jones, and he is not anti Bush. He is anti-NWO and has a wealth of information to back him up. Really, i have even heard him say Bush
is just a handy tool.

Originally posted by Saphronia
dgtempe is right...Alex Jones hardly says Bush without calling him a tool. He did the same to Clinton and still does. As long as it can be said oh,
he's a liberal or he's a conservative and we shouldn't believe a word he says the public will never pull that curtain back and expose the guys
pulling the levers. They want us to stay in Oz and be afraid to pull that curtain back and ask them who they are and what are they doing.

I donno, according to people who post things from his website such as things on 9/11 and the PA I and II and so on, they all keep saying the same
thing over and over and over.

I am quoting not actually believing yet.

"Those people with those sites only say this stuff so they can sell a book and get money."

Ironically this guy is BEGGING PEOPLE to give his stuff away.

so I don't know he might be or night not be...... Only who knows.

But I will say I guess all the info he gets from major organizations is bogus since they erased it and cant find it anymore.

A lot of negative post's about Mr. SheenYou don't have to be an expert on anything to see the problems with the offical story, The guy did alot more
research than most people can handle on this subject. And if you think a star like him comming out with this is not going to help convince people that
have to be pushed a little?

First of all, let me just say that Charlie Sheen has a lot of guts to come out and join the 9-11 Truth Seekers. Most of you right wingers are
programmed into thinking he must be some Hollywood liberal attention seeker. That is so far from the truth. This is a subject that scares the # out of
most people and they are fearful for the backlash they will get from the administration and the corporate controlled media.

This has nothing to do with supporting the Democrats... who are also involved in the cover-up... so let's please get past the right-left issue.

Charlie Sheen wants to simply draw attention to many of the unanswered questions involving 9-11. Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded
individuals have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the
father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense
minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department
of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more.

Now let's see what the press does with this story. I'm willing to bet that they will simply ignore it for fear of gathering attention to it. After
all, Charlie seems well informed on the facts surrounding the cover-up. But if Mr. Sheen was caught holding hands with a famous actress somewhere in
Los Angeles.... that would be considered news worthy to them.

Before you Bush supporters cast judgment, I suggest you seriously start taking a look at what's going on all around you.

Listen to the Alex Jones show ONE TIME! And then see if this starts making more sense.

I just listened to the interview. I think Charile coming out with this would be more of negative PR as alot of people might call him a wacko. I
think he's just saying what he feels needs to be known. Just like he says at the end of the interview "Its up to us to make the truth known for the
victims & victims familys".

Regardless of what you people think of Sheen and his "alterior motives" for talking about 911, he is certainly asking some of the good questions and
pointing out some of the most controversial aspects of the story. He has clearly researched it and is obviously following the developments and
theories closely. Which is a lot more than I can say of some, who blindly swallow the real conspiracy theory- The Official Story.

Drudge had the link up to the Sheen story and pulled it inexplicably. My bet is that he's touching too many sensitive buttons, with the potential for
too much publicity damage, and the White House is all over it, nipping it in the bud. The 911 truth movement should be so lucky as to get someone with
his broad appeal to jump on board. Alterior motives or not, this is a very good thing. We need to find out the damn truth about the case, once and for
all, and Charlie Sheen is doing nothing but helping that cause.

Hooray!!! Someone with balls. It will probably destroy his career or he'll be found dead off a snowy mountain road one day. I find it amazing that
people would take shots at him here on this board. The fun part now is what kind of dirt does Charlie have on the power players . He had to have
something to cover his butt, if he doesn't he is crazy!

charlie sheen is on my 'heroes of the apocalypse' list, now.
i hope he gets to live.

i listened to the interview last night. he's right on the money with his research. like mark twain, said, 'a lie can walk halfway around the world
while the truth is just putting on it's shoes'. (paraphrased, maybe)

PLUH-HEASE don't turn this into a 'hollywood political campaign' where 'motives' are more important than 'truth'. charlie sheen is speaking
the truth. his motives are irrelevent. his message is relevent.

Originally posted by dgtempe
They get paid an obscene $20 million at least.

If all celebrities were Republicans, that would be alright? You wouldnt hear anyone moaning about this one or that one.

They have a voice, they are heard. Good for them.

Anything to cancel out the noise coming out of Fox, Hannity and the likes.

As far as educated, all the people i have heard so far, Susan Sarandon, Ed Asner, and the likes do KNOW what they are talking about and do not need a
script.
Many of them have a college education also.

You dont need to go to Yale to be wise, imo.

So this is about left vs right in your mind then? Where does the truth fit in then?

It is this sympathy that this whole PR show is designed to take advantage of.

By the way, 3 out of 4 US networks are left of centre, myself I think that is wrong.

The real issues behind 911 have little to do with politics and a lot to do with money and power period.

The fact that Sheen is WHO he is and what he has a certain background combined with the shilling he is now doing, convinces me who is behind 911.

Originally posted by denythestatusquo
While we are on the topic of the White House...

Why is Jones so anti Bush??

I mean he is very knowledgeable about the NWO etc., then he knows that GWB is a lower level stooge. He also knows that the Democrats are controlled.
Yet he seems to be left of centre politically in all his views.

What I am getting at is that I am trusting him less and less as a person that is fighting for the rest of us. I'm starting to see people like him and
Rense and Icke as left-wing/socialist plants setup by the globalists. Although I follow what they say and they are a source of information, I trust
them less and less because of their obcession with trying to destroy Bush above all else.

It would be like a general in the second world war, fixating on a german officer when he knows the problem is Hitler or even Hitler's backers the
international bankers/satanists.

It is illogical and self-serving and even makes them look like fools to people that can think for themselves but yet so many of their followers fall
for this stuff.

If you want to clean up the world then fixate on the internationalists and their ilk, they are running the world and not the White House.

I have just watched the Showbiz Tonight video on infowars, and its been taken as quite a big deal in america, with alot of coverage. But being from
england i have not seen or heard anything on the news about it.
So decided to search the net looking for an English article on it and i found this:

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.