Individuation

An individuatated individual is one in whom the unconsious
and conscious are harmonized, and ego is decentralized (prerequisite and
consequence). This is achieved by getting in touch with the unconscious,
without allowing the ego to be overwhelmed by it. Ego has an explicit value.
Functions which exist below the threshold of consciousness need to be brought
above that threshold , repressed shadow contents need to be acknowledged,
and the major archetypes of the collective unconscious (shadow, anima/animus,
self) need to be discovered and related to, so that their influence can
be consciously mediated, their concerns addressed, since they are quasi-autonomous
subpersonalities in their own right.

Individuation is a life long process which is never really
finished, though minimum prerequisites are achievable.

The individuated human being is just ordinary,
therefore almost invisible. . . . His feelings, thoughts,
etc., are just anybody's feelings, thoughts, etc.-- quite ordinary, as a
matter of fact, and not interesting at all. . . . He will
have no need to be exaggerated, hypocritical, neurotic, or any other nuisance.
He will be "in modest harmony with nature.". . . No
matter whether people think they are individuated or not, they are just
what they are: in the one case a man plus an unconscious nuisance disturbing
to himself -- or, without it, unconscious of himself; or in the other case,
conscious. The criterion is consciousness.

What distinguishes active imagination from simple fantasy
is the full participation of the ego, imaginatio vera versus imaginatio
fantastica. An initial difficulty is thinking something like “Oh, I’m
just making this up” (imaginatio fantastica). The ego consciousness
which participates in active imagination is the full waking ego, not a
fictive or dream ego.

Let me illustrate with an example. An analysand
recounted to Jung an imagination she had begun in the following terms:
“I was on a beach by the sea, and a lion was coming toward me. He turned
into a ship and was out on the sea -- “ Jung interupted her: “Nonsense.
When a lion comes toward you, you have a reaction. You don’t just wait
around and watch until the lion turns into a ship!” We might say that the
fact that the analysand had no reaction -- for example, fear, self-defense,
amazement -- shows that she did not take the image of the lion entirely
seriously, but rather in some corner of her mind was thinking, “After all,
it’s only a fantasy lion.”

(von Franz, 1993, page 147)

The ego likewise operates with concern for ethics. For
example, von Franz relates an active imagination of analysand who was having
trouble with her landlady. A toadlike dwarf emerged from a river and asked
to speak to the landlady. The analysand sensed something threatening in
the dwarf and had to decide whether or not to allow it to speak to the
landlady, since she sensed the possiblility of it doing some harm. (von
Franz, 1993, page 151)

Give images/content of active imagination form through
writing (most common), painting, sculpting, or dance (least common, make
notes on dance). Don’t be either obsessed with aesthetic or sloppy. Again
honesty important.

Apply what is learned to daily life. (Requirement of
Jungian psychotherapy in general).

This is essentially von Franz' recipe as outlined in her
book Psychotherapy (1993). Other descriptions vary, but they all
have two things in common in order to qualify as active imagination:

Full participation of the ego complex.

No outside agencies, tools, effects.

The relationship in active imagination is between ego-consciousness
and the unconscious. The therapist does not 'guide' the analysand, there
is no mantra, no soothing music playing in the background.

Diekman (1988) and others mention that the starting point
for active imagination need not be a naturally occurring thought or image,
but may be chosen (a figure in a dream, for example).

Due to the full participation of ego-consciousness in
a relationship with the unconscious, the experience of active imagination
can be a very powerful one. This is why one comes across warning such as
the one at the beginning of this section. The truth of the relationship
can be uncanny and may potentially activate latent psychoses. Dieckmann
(1988) notes that it should only be engaged in by persons who have a strong
degree of ego stability. After active imagination Jung would use yoga exercises
to calm himself before making his paintings (von Franz, 1993), and access
to a technique such as yoga or Zen meditation would be a valuable asset
to anyone setting out to do active imagination, especially without the
guidance of a qualified professional (not advised).

Von Franz also warns of affects which go beyond the person
practicing the imagination. In the aforementioned case of the toadlike
dwarf, the analysand decided that it could speak to the landlady so long
as she accompanied it so that she could intervene if need be to keep it
from doing harm. It told the landlady risqué stories which amused the landlady
very much. According to von Franz, there was also a corresponding mellowing
of mood in the actual landlady subsequent to the active imagination. Von
Franz advises avoiding figures of actual living people in active imagination
if at all possible. She also notes that she has experienced somatic effects
of a positive or negative nature depending on the quality of active imaginations.

Active imagination is a powerful tool which if used should
be used with caution. Dieckmann's doesn't mention any 'supernatural' effects,
but he does specify the need for ego-stability due to the potential for
active imagination to activate latent psychoses.