SCIENTIFIC STUDIES MANUFACTURED BY MONSANTO ABOUT ROUNDUP SHOULD BE THROWN OUT

The review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate is a serious matter that could have massive implications. But newly released emails show that the corporation Monsanto may have "ghost-written" scientific studies affirming the safety of glyphosate. Monsanto has a financial stake in the registration of glyphosate, as its product Roundup grosses as much as $1 billion per year for Monsanto.

To ensure your review of glyphosate is not affected by corporate influence, but based on sound and independent science, please do not consider the following studies, which were likely written in part by Monsanto: 1) Greim, et al. (2015), Evaluation of carcinogenic potential of the herbicide glyphosate, drawing on tumor incidence data from fourteen chronic/carcinogenicity rodent studies; 2) Kier & Kirkland (2013), Review of genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and glyphosate-based formulations; and, 3) Williams (2000), Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans.

Sorry, we couldn't find your address.
Please correctly spell out the full address, and do not abbreviate (for example, spell out SAINT PAUL instead of St. Paul).
Please refrain from including any extra dashes or symbols when you enter your street address.

By providing my contact information, I consent to have Arizona PIRG and the other groups in The Public Interest Network contact me with information about this and future campaigns. View our Privacy Policy.