Tuesday, October 07, 2014

IS OBAMA PLANNING MASS ARRESTS? By Sherwood Ross

Is the Obama regime preparing for mass arrests of American civilians? Some indicators suggest this is a real possibility.

It
has all the laws it needs to imprison anyone should it plan to make
mass arrests (thanks, Congress, for the unconstitutional Patriot Act and
National Defense Authorization Act).

It has illegally compiled lists of some 8 million names, (thank you, FBI and NSA).

It has vast stockpiles of weapons and bullets, (salute the Pentagon!)

It
has $385 million worth of new dormitories (i.e., prisons?) tucked away
on military bases called "National Emergency Centers" (thanks,
Halliburton construction subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root).

And it has invested 120,000 on-duty officers from 73 law enforcement agencies with authority to arrest "suspects."

If
you think "it can't happen here," as described in the 1935 Sinclair
Lewis novel of that name, think again. What's to stop USG from doing
Stateside what it has been doing around the world? After all, who has
already begun killing American citizens with illegal drone strikes if
not totalitarian trendsetter President Barack Obama?

As
Bill Blum, a Washington investigative journalist writes in his
"Anti-Empire Report," since the end of World War 2, the U.S. has
interfered in the elections of at least 30 countries and dropped bombs
on people in as many others and attempted to overthrow more than 50,
mostly democratic, governments, such as Iran in 1953 and Chile in 1973.
What's stopping it from turning a democracy into a dictatorship?

Romero
added, Obama's actions "raises serious questions about the
administration's commitment to the rule of law." That's a polite way of
saying the president is a law-breaker. And extrajudicial killings are
official Obama policy. As Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair
claimed in Congressional testimony, the U.S. can, with executive
approval, kill U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism.

"It
is alarming to hear that the Obama administration is asserting that the
president can authorize the assassination of Americans abroad, even if
they are far from any battlefield and may have never taken up arms
against the U.S., but have only been deemed to constitute and
unspecified 'threat,'" points out Ben Wizner, staff lawyer for the ACLU
National Security Project.

The key phrase here
is "unspecified 'threat'", another way of saying "suspected." As George
Mickum, a lawyer who has represented Guantanamo Bay prisoners, told
Inter Press Service(IPS), "We have killed thousands of innocent
civilians while attempting to target alleged operatives. And let us not
forget how frequently our intelligence has been wrong about alleged
operatives. As the civilians were not engaged in hostile actions, their
murders by the Obama regime become 'war crimes.'"

And
constitutional scholar Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois,
Champaign, told IPS, "This extrajudicial execution of human beings
constitutes murder, war crimes, and because the drone strikes are
widespread and systemic, crimes against humanity. Because Obama’s drone
strikes almost exclusively target Muslims and People of Color, they
verge upon genocide.”

Boyle said, further, "The
U.S. government has now established a 'death list' for U.S. citizens
abroad akin to those established by Latin American dictatorships during
their so-called dirty wars."

If you think the
USG will not condemn more Americans to death without trials, ponder the
words of attorney John Whitehead, head of the Rutherford Institute of
Charlottesville, Va.: "Unfortunately, 'we the people' have become so
trusting, so gullible, so easily distracted, so out-of-touch, so
compliant and so indoctrinated on the idea that our government will
always do the right thing by us that we have ignored the warning signs
all around us, or at least failed to recognize them as potential red
flags." Whitehead is the author of "A Government of Wolves: The Emerging
American Police State."

Q: Why do the
Postal Service, Department of Education, Internal Revenue Service,
Social Security Administration and National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration buy up weapons and ammunition in bulk?

Q: Why does the Department of Agriculture need 320,000 rounds of hollow point bullets and .40 caliber submachine guns?

Whitehead
points to a New York Times article quoting a Pentagon source who says
that under Obama police departments have received tens of thousands of
machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces
of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers,
armored cars and aircraft.

In addition to
militarizing the police, Obama's USG is building a Main Core database,
Whitehead says, that "would be used by military officials to locate and
round up Americans seen as threats to national security…to be carried
out by the Army and FEMA.

Whitehead concludes,
"Taken individually, these questions are alarming enough. However, when
viewed collectively, they leave one wondering what exactly the U.S.
government is preparing for and whether American citizens shouldn't be
preparing, as well, for that eventuality when our so-called 'government
of the people, by the people, for the people' is no longer answerable to
'we the people.'" #

(Sherwood Ross, who
formerly reported for the Chicago Daily News and worked as a columnist
for wire services, currently operates a public relations firm "for good
causes". Reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com)

About Me

We do not open attachments. Stop e-mailing them. Threats and abusive e-mail are not covered by any privacy rule. This isn't to the reporters at a certain paper (keep 'em coming, they are funny). This is for the likes of failed comics who think they can threaten via e-mails and then whine, "E-mails are supposed to be private." E-mail threats will be turned over to the FBI and they will be noted here with the names and anything I feel like quoting.
This also applies to anyone writing to complain about a friend of mine. That's not why the public account exists.