> From: [log in to unmask]
> Given that his son did not acquire spoken Klingon, and, in fact,
> rejected it, seems to imply that something about Klingon is so
> unnatural that it does not mesh with the language circuitry in the
> human brain. To me that means that Klingon is not just a non-human
> language, it is an inhuman language, i.e., so fundamentally "wrong"
> that it could never, under any circumstances, become anyone's L1.

I heard a different interpretation -- that the boy rejected Klingon once he reached pre-school age and started interacting regularly with other children. None of the other kids understood Klingon, so this boy dropped it as well.

No use speaking a language (in most of your social contexts) which nobody else understands.