MIDDLE EAST UPDATES(if there are any to speak of)
June 11 - 17, 2013

NSA Scandal WidensorAs Wide as HellorThe Sinclair Link to Moray was a Doda Bird, Even a Maccabee

Recall how the deaths of even 100 Libyans was such a cause of concern amongst the Westerners that they just had to go in and overthrow Qaddafi lickety-split. Yet, in the same situation in Syria, the West has permitted several tens of thousands of Syrians to die without showing the same "heroism." It is a very depressing thing to see hypocrisy all over the leader of the 1st nation of the world. What sort of leader leads by hypocrisy after hypocrisy?

But Obama is right-now in the midst of changing his tune on Syria, pulling off a George Bush by claiming, suddenly, that the Syrian government is using chemical weapons. The truth is, the Syrian rebels have been using chemical weapons:

President Obama has repeatedly said that the use of chemical weapons is a "red line" that, if crossed, would be a "game changer" for more U.S. involvement in the Syrian civil war.

"The President has been clear that the use of chemical weapons - or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups - is a red line for the United States," said Rhodes in a separate written statement.

"The President has said that the use of chemical weapons would change his calculus, and it has," he continued.

The article says that Obama will now share military aid (unidentified) with the rebels even while the rebels have just tightened their alliance with al-Qaeda. How can we expect this change on the part of the U.S. military to be on behalf of the Syrian people when the new government that the military is supporting is expected to have extremist leaders? Forget it; there is nothing honorable about the U.S. tack in Syria.

Another article said that the White House is on the verge of deciding whether to claim a no-fly zone in Syria as far out as 25 miles from the Jordanian border. The excuse there is that the U.S. wants to train Syrian rebels inside Jordan, and also to protect Syrian refugees there...so that a no-fly zone is "necessary." That's garbage to make it look ethical. The no-fly zone will require the shooting up of Syrian guns on the ground that can take an American plane down. You can't have a no-fly zone without declaring war. Stay tuned.

I want to stress that Obama is lying. This decision to go to war has nothing to do with Syria crossing a red line. However, I do not know why he has made the change. I was sure that he wanted to invade long ago, but that Russia frightened him. Suddenly, I suppose, he's either not afraid of Russia, or he's taking his chances on the outcome. This comes at a bad time when China would tend to support Russia even more than before due to the NSA scandal as it touches China. See details later in this update.

There is another possible explanation for Obama's past refusal to lend the rebels military support: the conditions were not yet to his liking. That is, he wanted the rebels to agree to giving him something in return for sharing "his" military with them. The rebels, however, were unwilling to make the agreement with Obama, and so he left them in limbo until such time that they changed their tune. Perhaps now, after a period of futility, they are now giving in.

In the meantime, Russia assured Obama just days ago that it would not send Syria the anti-aircraft S-300 missile system until mid-2014. That date may change if Obama orders a no-fly zone:

The Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, has said [June 15] that any attempt to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria using US fighter jets and Patriot missiles from Jordan would violate international law.

Does Obama agree? Chiding him, Lavrov said: "You don't have to be a great expert to understand that this will violate international law." Is that correct? Do the Westerners care about breaking the law? Doesn't the Bible predict lawlessness? Is Lavrov justifying the engagement of Russia in the war's escalation? We seem to be on the precipice of a turning point in the war, or at least a new chapter.

Lavrov called out the illegal fake-ness by which the Western globalists operate when saying:

...the evidence [for chemical-weapons use by Assad] must meet the standards of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which specifies that samples taken from blood, urine and clothing can be considered reliable evidence only if supervised by organisation experts from the time they are gathered to when they are delivered to a laboratory.

Tony Blair, Bush's best ally when Bush started the Afghan war, is, not surprisingly, at the front of calls to escalate the Syrian war. "Britain should arm the Syrian rebels and consider imposing a no-fly zone over Syria to prevent 'catastrophic consequences', Tony Blair has said." But what of the consequences on the flip side of the coin? Is Blair confident that Afghanistan and Iraq will not be repeated in Syria? Neither of the two Middle-Eastern nations had Russia on side, as Syria now appears to have. Doesn't this begin to spell "world war," or is Tony completely out to lunch? Are the reckless globalists that obsessed with Middle-East control? Yes.

This "decision" by Obama explains why he's been stroking Israel lately, for he would greatly appreciate the option of Israel's support in a Syria escalation. However, the deeper he gets in with Israel, the more he may need to tolerate Israel's attack on Iran (if it ever comes). We might say that the war on Iran that Bush and Blair were unable to wage due to having insufficient world support is soon becoming front-page with Obama, the same Obama who promised not to be like Bush. The shaky man is thin ice, and so prepare yourself for a botch of global magnitude that may never be repaired once he crosses the red lines of his enemies.

I don't think it's coincidental that there has been a demonstration in Egypt for to increase fighters in support of Syrian rebels. I'd say that Obama's linkage to Brotherhood types is behind that demonstration. Obama also has Hamas on side. "Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, from whose ranks Morsi comes, will hold a gathering on [June 15] at a stadium in Cairo under the slogan 'in support of the Syria revolution."'http://www.france24.com/en/20130614-thousands-egypt-islamists-rally-syria-jihad

Assuming that the anti-Christ of Daniel 11:21-30 will invade Egypt as a direct backlash against this Brotherhood movement to overthrow Assad, it behooves me to view the anti-Christ as a Russian agent in support of Assad. However, it seems inconceivable at this time that Russia should invade Egypt. In order for this to take place out of the current situation, Russia would need to score huge while the Brit-Obama team would need to flounder badly in a heavy-duty conflict that ruffles passions deeply.

A new chapter has been turned in Iran, with Ahmadinejad about to lose his presidency to a new one in the elections now under way. The front runner, Hasan Rowhani, is anti-West, but we shall need to see whether he takes a hard line against Israel.

The National Snooping Agency

Believe it or not.

American spymasters snooped on the private life of Tony Blair, according to reports in the U.S.

Mr Blair was given the code name ‘Anchory’ as his private telephone calls were routinely listened into and recorded.

A file containing personal information about him is said to have been compiled at a giant U.S. listening post run by the secretive National Security Agency.

The extraordinary claim was made by a former Navy communications operator who worked at a listening post in Fort Gordon, Georgia.

David Murfee Faulk told American TV network ABC News that he had seen a file on the ‘private life’ of Mr Blair in 2006.

A few have suggested that the Obama administration leaked the National Security Agency scandal in order to take focus off of the IRS scandal. I'm going to ignore that idea. It appears more as though someone or Someone has an entire exposure program aimed at Obama's ruin. For example, in order to make the NSA scandal stick, it was first necessary that the AP and FOX spy programs were leaked in order to make media sympathetic with Snowden's case. If the media take Snowden's position seriously, his side of the issue will be advertised well.

Snowden's (worked at NSA) is the one who whistle-leaked the NSA spy program, the one that the government, as well as some Republican leaders, wish for you to oppose as a criminal deserving jail time. This aftermath of the NSA scandal is as important to the future of the "new world order" as is the very machine built to spy on us all. The machine is being threatened, but only over Obama's dead body...because he's indicated that he's not going to destroy the spy program no matter what the majority say. The NSA aftermath is all about convincing people that the Snowdens of America are in the wrong.

Obama's problem is that many Democrats oppose the invasion of privacy. Obama may have some Republican lawmakers on side, and therefore some loyal Republican voters, but he has many more Democrats looking at him now through the contorted prism of PRISM. It's contorted because Obama was re-elected on his opposition to this very spy machine, and here he is, fully aware of his hypocrisy, exposing his hypocrisy unashamed. What's worse for making hypocrites of the nation (in front of the whole world) is that Democrats as a body may now be for, not against, the same spy machine created by Bush.

Boehner, Obama's pet Republican, says that Snowden is a traitor. That could be true only if America was truly under serious attack by terrorists. Besides, "James Sensenbrenner (Republican, Wisconsin), the author of the 2001 Patriot Act, wrote for the Guardian that the Obama administration's interpretation of the law justifying the surveillance has surpassed what the bill's language authorises."http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/11/us-senators-government-secret-court-surveillance

Here is what sounds like a very level head:

The former head of the NSA's global digital data gathering program, William Binney:

- Confirms Snowden's allegations about the mass surveillance program

- Says that revealing the details of the spying program will not harm national security … and that government officials are only mad because it exposes their overreaching

- Says that massive surveillance doesn't work to make us safer [I say it's because there is virtually no terror threat inside the U.S.]

- Says that he set up the NSA's system so that all of the information would automatically be encrypted, so that the government had to obtain a search warrant based upon probably cause before a particular suspect's communications could be decrypted. But the NSA now collects all data in an unencrypted form...

- Says that the government is using information gained through mass surveillance in order to go after anyone they take a dislike to

- Says that the NSA's spying programs have brought us incredibly close to "a turnkey totalitarian state"

Dianne Feinstein sounds absolutely loony when she charges Snowden with treason. That crime is the attempted ruin of the government (I and many others wish that the Obama government would fall), but Snowden is not whatsoever to be charged with treason...for seeking to curb the illegalities of government snooping. Feinstein is the screech owl that mistakens a mouse under the foliage with the claw of a Tyrannosaurus Rex. Snowden is merely a mouse, and should not be attacked with the full force of the law when more than half the American population agrees that the NSA has gone too far; the other half probably disagrees merely for their loyalty to Obama, and to the Republicans that are pro-Patriot Act. Feinstein agrees that the NSA has gone too far, yet condemns Snowden anyway. If not for Snowden, what would the Internet snooping busy-ness look like in five or ten years from now? They are watching people as they type their chat sessions even now. Feinstein, get your act together, because they can watch your chat sessions too. Who do they think they are?

I've mentioned the Drake surname often, and recently, according to a Sign that I claim we (it wasn't for me alone) received, I traced Obama exactly to the Drake surname using "muscas = fly" in it's motto. The Fly sign (early this year) caused me to predict: 1) that Obama was about to be involved in "black helicopter" operations; 2) that Obama was about to be ruined, perhaps even by assassination. The latter point was not as assured in my mind as the first point, and not many weeks after the fly sign, there occurred the string of faked terror events (predicted by those who accuse Obama of black-helicopter government) followed immediately by the scandals of the past few weeks.

I'm repeating the fly Sign because I have just come across a Drake surname in the news on the NSA leak. "Thomas Drake, a former NSA executive who famously leaked information about what he considered a wasteful datamining program at the agency, said of Snowden: 'He's extraordinarily brave and courageous.' Drake was investigated so intensely by the justice department that the longtime analyst was reduced to working at an Apple store until the Obama administration abruptly dropped charges that could have landed him in jail for 35 years." THOMAS Drake reminds me of THOMAS de Vere whom I've said was the line the first earl of Moray, THOMAS Randolph...with a surname that is in the line to Obama's mother, Ann Dunham. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/10/the-nsa-files-edward-snowden

Note how Drake compares the George-Bush America with Communist Germany. Perhaps there is more intended than token comparison. Here's another of his quotes from the prisonplanet article above: "I became an expert on East Germany, which was then the ultimate surveillance state. Their secret police were monstrously efficient: they had a huge paper-based system that held information on virtually everyone in the country -- a population of about 16-17 million. The Stasi's motto was 'to know everything'" More here:

Drake...entered the U.S. Air Force in 1979, becoming an Airborne Voice Processing Specialist, with a fluency in German, and went on ELINT (electronic intelligence) missions. It was in that capacity that he encountered the surveillance state of East Germany and the Stasi, which informed his worldview and to which he compares developments in the United States since the September 11 attacks...He was also in the U.S. Navy, where he analyzed intelligence for the National Military Joint Intelligence Center. According to the Washington Post, he also at one time worked with the CIA. In 1989 Drake began work as an NSA contractor, evaluating software...

Drake must have learned quite a bit about the Nazi colors of American Intelligencia. He didn't like it. He wasn't really one of them. The article continues: "...his actual first day on the job as an NSA employee being September 11, 2001." What a coincidence, the day the New York towers fell. Was he hired as part of that plot, only to frown on it later?

It's hard to say whether Thomas Drake was a part of some Illuminati group, but as I traced Drakenberg / Drakes to the Baphomet cult that derives in an ImPERI peoples, that I trace to a line of Paris Trojans that founded PERIgord, it's interesting that Drake, after he was released by NSA, "founded KnowPARI Systems."

Another interesting tidbit is that while Obama saved Drake from his whistleblower actions, we find that NSA was ruled by a Michael Hayden, having a surname that I trace to "Ayers." Haydens were first found in the same place (Norfolk) as Randolph-related Dunhams, and are traced in their write-up to "Justice of EYRE." Bill Ayers, whose family helped to get Obama elected, was an American -- i.e. insider -- terrorist in an organization (Weather Underground) named in-part after the Weather/Withers surname (HARE in Crest), first found in the same place (Hampshire) as Drakes. The Weather Underground logo uses two of the colors in the Weather/Withers Coat. Bill Ayers was a co-founder of the rebel organization along with a man with Long surname that I trace to Drakes.

The Drake surname is the one that seems to be advertising a 666 with the tail of its dragon. Near the end of the last update, I showed how Obama's lines are related to Clappers and Gettys, but here I can add that while Gettys use "Capta" in their motto, Drake's use "captat muscas." And look, the Getty Coat has a small shield in colors reversed to the small Hay/Hey shields. Could the Heys/Hays be a branch of Keys/Kays? Isn't the PRISM logo a key shape?

It was just two updates ago when I emphasized JUGurtha, grandson of King Massena. I ventured to suggest a Jugurtha link to the Jugg/Judd surname...which I now see again using a version of the red Drake wyvern in Crest! That's important because the Juggs/Judds just came to mind at the "jugum" motto term of the Heys/Hays. I just finished tracing the King-Massena line to the theater of key-using Avignon. I've longed traced the "Serva" term of the Heys/Hays to the Coles / Kyles (AYRshire) who trace to Mieszko of Poland, and then the Mieske surname shares a black bull with Coles and Haydens.

Shortly after the fly Sign (its all recorded in the updates), I was led to a Drago river in southern Sicily, a river I had never known before, situated very near a Caiaphas-suspect Montechiaro location the rulers of which married a Mosca surname. It was an AHA moment to discover this. I figured that this part of Sicily had to do with the pile-using GUIScard surname that is likely in the Guis variation of Guido's. I had traced the Gettys to the naming of "Guido" Guerra, that family that married MontFerrat, a Pharisee-suspect line that I traced to the naming of the Varni...who are depicted in heraldry by a wyVERN dragon, defined as a dragon with a pointed tail, two legs instead of four, and wings. The Drake and the Vere dragons are wyverns.

The Vere's use a green wyvern, something I've known for several years, but it was only weeks ago that I found another green wyvern in the Guerra surnames. That clinched the Drake / Vere / MontFERRAT trace to Guido Guerra.

Heraldry is filled with secret code work, though in the case of mottos, it's not so secretive in many cases. The most secretive parts of heraldry, perhaps, are in the write-ups, usually in the words to which a surname is traced. Here's an example in the write-up of Bend surname: "The ancestry of the name Bend dates from the ancient Anglo-Saxon culture of Britain [the Varni were part of Anglo-Saxon origins]. It comes from when the family lived in Cheshire and Lancashire. Originally, the surname was derived from the Old English word beonet, which meant by the grassy plain." There is a Grasse location in southern France that has become a significant topic in the dragon hunt only within the last year or so. Grasse is just outside of an area called, Var, and only about 30 miles from DRAGUIGNan (i.e. a dragoon-like term).

The Bend/Bent surname is likely code for the heraldic "bend," which is the diagonal bar used, for example, by the Guerra surname. In fact, the Guerra surname uses three blue bends that, in the world of shipping, is the number 6. Theoretically, three blue bends could be construed as, 666.

Long before I came to Guido Guerra for the first time in recent months, I traced the Bend surname to mythical "Bant" or "Ban," the name of Lancelot's father. Virtually all characters in king-Arthur myth are mere codes for surnames. Long before I knew of the marriage between Guido Guerra and the daughter of the ruler (William V) of Montferrat, I traced "Lancelot" to the same element that named Lancashire, where the Bends/Bents (and BANESters) were first found, but I also traced "Lanca" to "Langhe," an area smack at Montferrat. It's not coincidence, is it?

I traced both the line of Caiaphas and that of Drakes to the pre-Christian Eburovices (the Abruzzo line that named the royal Bruce's) in the location of Brixia/Brescia, which place uses a blue-on-white lion, the color of the Bruce lion. This is repeated here because the Bend/Bent Crest is a blue lion. I have become very confident by many means that the 666 system, and all of the anti-Christian persecution of the future, will be from lines going back in pride to Caiaphas and other priests of Israel...who took pride in killing Jesus. This is the culmination and final analysis of all my dragon hunt over many years of full-time work.

The Drakes at Draguignan were in cahoots with the Salyes people (near Draguignan) who trace to the Sales-of-Masci in Cheshire, where the Bends/Bents were first found who use the Shield of Masci-related Bellamys. But the fleur-de-lys used by Sales are in the colors of the same used by Plains/Plater. The latter are being featured here due to the "grassy plain" in the Bend/Bent write-up. And that's how heraldry codework works.

It recalls the feasibility of a trace of Valerius Gratus to the Grasse location / surname by way of the Gros/Graus/Graut surname (blue lion) surname. Valerius Gratus was the Roman governor of Judea immediately before Pontius Pilate took the job, and this means that the PILATe bloodline might just trace to the Plain/PLATer surname. It can explain the "grassy plain" code, especially as I traced the line of the Bassianus priesthood to Grasse.

The Bend surname helps to prove that the Bassanius line traces to Grasse. The latter location became one of my topics only because the Dumas and related Lamas surnames trace to the Arms of Grasse. We find La Mas (a location near Grasse) in the Dumas write-up, and then the Dumas Coat shares gold roundels, called "besants" (i.e. code for the Bassianus bloodline), with the Bends/Bents who show "grassy plain" in their write-up.

Note that the Pilate surname shares so-called "pheon" arrow heads with the Sale Crest. The Helms, who use the Sale pheon in my opinion, are in code in the Pendragon "helmet," and then Pendragons use the Sale pheons in colors reversed. The point of repeating this (some of you may have read this too many times) is for the "Nosce" motto term in the Pendragon motto. I have never been able to find a surname that "Nosce" may link to, but, now, feasibly, it can be for an N-variation of "Mosca." The Sales-of-Mosca, so to speak. In this picture, the PenDRAGon/PenDREIG surname should trace to the namers of the Drago river, and to Draguignan.

A new thing came to mind immediately after writing the paragraph above. The Italian word for "born" is "nasci," and so he Bourne/Borne surname (Lancashire!) was just loaded to find a winged horse in Crest, the symbol also of the Massey/Macey Crest! For those who don't know, Masseys are a branch of Masci's out of the Montferrat / Langhe theater. The Bourne's smack of Bernicians to whom I trace the Mackay/Macey bears, and even the Arthur surname was first found in the Bernician city of bear-depicted Berwickshire. This paragraph has the potential to equate Bourne's, Masseys and Bernicians.

Suddenly, "nasci" this brings to mind "Nassau" as a version ultimately of "Massey", for there is an Orange location, to which Nassau's trace fundamentally, at the Durance river of the Salyes! Orange was a topic just two updates ago in relation to Massena-related Caiaphas lines tracing to the Cavari peoples. The Nassau/Naso lion can be construed either as the Ferrari lion, or the blue Massin/Mason lion in colors reversed. See also the Italian Naso's of Messina, and ask (as I was asking days before coming to this heraldry exercise) whether "NSA" was chosen as code for a sound-alike surname...such as "Nassau."

The Orange surname with OrRINGe variation reminded me of the Rang/Ringstead surname using what looks like a version of the Pendragon Coat. The Rang/Ringstead write-up: "Hence, conjecturally, the surname is descended from the tenant of the lands of Ringstead, held by Norman noble Roger de Evreux...the son of Comte de Evreux, who was the son of Richard 1, Duke of Normandy." The Eburovices named Evreux! The Ringers (in Rankin colors) use fleur-de-lys in the colors of the same of Masseys/Maceys. (My bet is that the bell in the Ringer Coat traces to the Bellovesus Gauls at Orange.)

(W)Rangels use a lion in Nassau-lion colors, and share a black Shield with Rangs/Ringsteads.

It could be added here that the Shaws, who traced to the Cavari and to king Massena, use the same-colored grail cups as the Pillettes/Pilotte's, and that the Burns of Renfrew (said to be Bernicians), now suspect as a Massey-Bourne bloodline, share the bugle with the Orange/Orringe and Brian surnames (Brians trace to Briancon on the Durance). It just so happens that the Orrs were first found in Renfrew too so that they should trace to the ORRinge variation of Orange's.

The Brian dagger looks like the Mackay/Macey dagger, and "MacKAY/MacKEY" looks to be a Massey-liner clan that adopted the Key/Kay surname that I now know to trace to the key symbol in the Arms of Avignon, this latter location being one of the Cavari homesteads along with Orange.

One Irish Brian Coat shares the split-colored lions of the Gras', while the Brians with a bugle (or "hunting horn" officially) use Pilate-suspect "piles" as well as a Lamas-suspect motto term in "Lamh" (this term is shared by the Salyes-based Sullivans). If that's not enough, the Orrs use a version of the Brian piles, thus clinching the Orr trace to "Orange" at the Durance. It could appear here that all of Masonry traces back to a pre-Christian merger of king-Massena lines with those furnishing Valerius Gratus and Pontius Pilate in Israel. This could be fully expected where it's correct to identify king Massena as the founder of Israel's Maccabees proper (see two updates ago for that claim).

Remember here that the Massena trace to Maccabees proper went to the particular Maccabees who made an alliance with Alexander Balas, the Seleucid king whose peoples I traced to "Salyes." I was adamant that the Alexander surname came from that source, and then the army general, Keith Alexander, now heads the NSA. However, and of course, having any surname that traces to the Masseys does not necessarily make one a conspiratorial villain. For example, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky opposes what's coming out from the NSA at this time. Nor is that to say that Thomas Massie cannot be part of a bloodline-loving group just because he opposes Alexander's position.

Here's an interesting statement: "Massie said he's meeting Tuesday with Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. -- two other civil liberties advocates -- to discuss a possible lawsuit on the [NSA] matter..." I happen to trace the Paul surname to Poles of the Mieszko kind, where I trace Massie's. There is no Amash surname coming up, but the Mash surname is listed with the Marsh's who definitely trace to the Shaws and therefore to the Cavari, as was shown two updates ago. The Mash surname was not mentioned at that time, though the Nimo/NewMarsh and Keith/Marshall surnames were. It just so happens that the Mash/Marsh Coat uses the same bird design as the Keys/Kays! Therefore, let it be reminded that the PRISM logo is a key symbol, like those who brag that they have a key of access, yes, but it may also be in use because the NSA consists of lines from the Cavari. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57588627/lawmakers-question-legal-basis-for-nsa-surveillance/

The Shawia-associated ZENETes Berbers in north Africa were traced to "THANET" in Kent, and it just so happens that the Mash/Marsh surname was first found in Kent. This English Key Coat compares well with the Coat of Timms/Time's (Edomite Hebrews, trust me), first found in Kent. This other English Key Coat has the same griffin design in Crest as the Crest of Tooks/Tolkiens, first found in Kent.

The Took/Tolkien sword is erect, symbol of the Bistones of ancient Libya. The Meshwesh that named king Massena were on the eastern side of Libya, in Cyrene, where the Senussi Libyans live who use the star in the colors of the Alexander star. Interesting here is that the Libby surname (use the Bruce / Brescia / Caiaphas lion) was first found in the same place (Yorkshire) as one Key surname, where the Bruce's operated who trace to Aphrodite, chief mistress of Ares, the latter being the one worshiped by Bistones in their erect sword.

The Libby Crest is an arm holding a "baton," and then entering "Baton" (Cornwall, same as Pendragons) gets the Bastons (i.e. smacking of Bistones). I know that this is the line to the Pendragon-related Baths and Badens/Battins of Somerset, and to the related Randolphs of Moray who share the bat symbol with the Batons/Bastons as well as sharing the Bath cross. The Massin/Mason Crest is a mermaid used by Morays, and Morays use a "Deum time " motto in honor of Timms/Time's. This was the line to king MacBeth at Moray, a line that's known to be the Beatons...using an otter in Crest, symbol for the Other/Otho surname that was represented in the UTHER Pendragon code.

The Libby lion is used also by the Massins/Masons, first found in Thanet, and both the "Dum" and "Domino" motto terms of Massins/Masons and Keys respectively are code for "Edom," in my strong opinion.

Here's Thomas Drake of the former NSA chief, Michael Hayden: "General Michael Hayden, who was head of the NSA when I worked there, and then director of the CIA, said, 'We need to own the net.' [Background] And that is what they're implementing here. They have this extraordinary system: in effect, a 24/7 panopticon on a vast scale that it is gazing at you with an all-seeing eye."

Privacy Concerns for Christians a Priority Over the Politics

Anti-Christianity is alive and well in the IRS: "A pro-life legal group, Alliance Defending Freedom, released audio today [June 10] of a 2012 phone call between an IRS agent and the head of a Texas pregnancy counseling group. During the phone call, IRS agent Sherry Wan is heard lecturing Ania Joseph about how she can't have a tax exemption and also push her religious beliefs -- a bit of advice that would be quite interesting to every church in America." It's not a surprising attitude, yet coming from an official I-Are-An-Ass business phone call, it is alarming: the American government actively working to suppress evangelicals. Since when is sharing one's faith in an effort to convert someone a crime? Since Communist Russia. http://hotair.com/archives/2013/06/10/audio-irs-agent-tells-pro-life-group-keep-your-faith-to-yourself/

Here's a twist; rather than suspecting anti-Israeli Americans as terrorists, now it's pro-Israeli Americans:

Applications of pro-Israel groups for tax-exempt status are routinely routed to an antiterrorism unit within the Internal Revenue Service for additional screening, according to the testimony of a Cincinnati-based IRS agent.

Asked whether Jewish or pro-Israel applications are treated differently from other applications, Gary Muthert told House Oversight Committee investigators that they are considered "specialty cases" and that "probably" all are sent to an IRS unit that examines groups for potential terrorist ties.

...On March 27, 2009 [while Obama was the big cheese], the day after Ignatiuss article appeared, the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) filed a spate of administrative complaints with the Treasury Department and the IRS, alleging that pro-Israel groups raising funds for settlements in the West Bank were supporting "illegal and terrorist activities abroad." Later that year, in October, the ADC said that it was waging an ongoing legal campaign against the IRS for what the ADC regarded as violations of the tax code by some pro-Israel groups.

The current NSA scandal has the potential to seriously thwart the global spy rings just in time for the great Christian retreat into the wilderness, which governments will oppose. It is not beyond reason that God should be orchestrating this attack against Obama, therefore. My only hope is that there is more to come. Hopefully, this latest noise is just the cracking open of the lid. If ever there were whistle blowers who have been thinking to blow, now could be a good time. If virtually the entire nation (minus the deadbeat Obama loyalists) can be placed on the same anti-Obama page, none of the whistle blowers will need to fear serious repercussions. If the exposure is damning enough, the O-people will be too emBARE-ASSED to bring whistle blowers to court.

People really do need to watch that their opinions aren't formed based on political zeal:

Today [i.e. under Obama], only about half of Republicans (52%) say it is acceptable for the NSA to obtain court orders to track phone call records of millions of Americans to investigate terrorism. In January 2006 [i.e. under Bush], fully 75% of Republicans said it was acceptable for the NSA to investigate suspected terrorists by listening in on phone calls and reading emails without court approval.

Democrats now view the NSA's phone surveillance as ACCEPTABLE by 64% to 34%. In January 2006, by a similar margin (61% to 36%), Democrats said it was UNACCEPTABLE for the NSA to scrutinize phone calls and emails of suspected terrorists.

The page has the frightening statement: "...45% say the government should be able to "monitor everyone's email and other online activities if officials say this might prevent future terrorist attacks." About as many (52%) say the government should not able to do this." Can you believe that nearly one out of every two people don't mind their emails being read by perfect strangers in the name of fighting the terrorism that isn't? This is unbelievable. I would suggest that the poll includes people who don't use a computer or email accounts, in which case they are naturally expected to be more favorable toward government snooping.

Before a poll is conducted to decide the issue, the people need to understand the level of ambition, or the agressiveness, or the great width of scope, by which spy people go about accumulating data. They don't just read your data and go ho-hum. They record your friends and relatives in your own file. They record the relatives of your friends and relatives. They record all sorts of things concerning you and your friends and your relatives in your own file until your file is a book of cosmic size -- without limit whatsoever, that is -- ever-growing between now and the day you die, and maybe even after the day you die.

If you are largely naive, you cannot imagine all the ways in which these "books" can be abused, in the same way that a state prosecutor will take an innocent man to court to put him in prison, or worse, because the prosecutor is incompetent, just plain wrong, or wicked. There are all sorts of reasons that innocent people end up in jail based often on false or twisted testimony. If the government has a super-huge book on you, there is bound to be some part of it that can be twisted to malign your character in just such a way as to make you appear guilty for the charge at hand.

Let's imagine that your Italian neighbor was hung on a tree until dead in his backyard, and you become a suspect due only to your proximity. You may not have known that the person you were chatting with back in 2008 is the son of a Mafia man, but the prosecutor in your court case may be fully convinced that there is a connection between you and the Mafia, and the prosecutor may set out to "prove" it. Sooner or later, he finds another person in your cosmic-sized "book" that you chatted with, and she happens to be a daughter of another Mafia leader. Uh-oh. It's starting to look bad, and the prosecutor isn't even started looking for dirt. He then finds you saying something like, "He made me so upset I felt like ringing his neck." All the while, you had no idea that you were chatting with the children of Mafia people.

If you don't want to take my word on it, take the word of a former NSA chief:

Top NSA whistleblower William Binney -- the former head of the National Security Agency's global digital data gathering program -- has repeatedly explained that just because you "haven't done anything wrong" doesn't mean you can't be severely harmed by spying:

The problem is, if they think they're not doing anything that's wrong, they don't get to define that. The central government does.

Binney explains that the government is storing everything, and creating a searchable database...to be used whenever it wants, for any purpose it wants (even just going after someone it doesn’t like).

And he notes that the government will go after anyone who is on its enemies list:...

...And then they can use this system [what I called your cosmic book] to go back in time and scrutinize every decision you've ever made, every friend you've ever discussed something with. And attack you on that basis to sort to derive suspicion from an innocent life and paint anyone in the context of a wrongdoer.

Did you know that the man who created the film that Obama blamed for the Benghazi attack is still in jail??? Can you believe this, coming from the president? It has nothing to do with Obama's incompetence, but with his wickedness. Others must pay dearly what they don't deserve so that Obama may prosper.

Here's Snowden: "Any analyst at any time can target anyone. Any selector. Anywhere," he said. "I, sitting at my desk, had the authority to wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president if I had a personal e-mail." NSA is of course denying this, but he whistleblower is promising more revelations. "'We are going to have a lot more significant revelations that have not yet been heard over the next several weeks and months," said Glenn Greenwald of The Guardian." Why it will take that long to get the information out, I can't imagine. Perhaps there is some leveraging going on to make Obama comply, or else. Perhaps Snowden is bucking for a pardon, or else.

There's a lot of dancing around the facts going on. Here's how one Democrat (Steny Hoyer of Maryland) is framing the controversy, saying that Obama is handling it better than Bush had, as if to make us feel that all is well, therefore:

Under the Bush administration, the NSA came under fire after it was revealed that the agency was tapping domestic phone calls without a court order. By contrast, the Obama administration received the authority to conduct its surveillance from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, according to reports.

Talk about spin. Bush was guilty of spying without a court order, and Democrats were upset about it. Now, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has concluded that no president needs court orders before spying, and yet Democrats are fine with it. (Hoyers, by the way, are a branch of Hayers.)

The question is whether one special court has the right to decide that no court orders are needed to read someone's correspondence. Of course it's not right. The special court is in violation of law. The special court is secretly striking down a law without the other side having a say. How convenient for the globalist goons.

It doesn't mean that a thief is no longer a criminal just because a pro-Mafia secret court legalizes theft. That's roughly what the Obama people have just done, and Hoyer wants you to be ignorant of this view. The law is that the authorities must catch their enemies and criminals by means other than using telephone lines, and then, once they have sufficient evidence of criminality, they can ask a court to tap phones to "bust" the criminal. Otherwise, if the primary method of catching criminals is by listening to all phone calls, it violates all, and makes the authorities into the criminals. Obama is a criminal as much as Democrats viewed Bush as a criminal for not getting court orders.

Putin has just said: "But you can't just listen to the phone call in Russia; you need a special order from court. This is how this should be done in civilized society while tackling terrorism with the use of any technical means." That's the way it was in the United States too...until the neo-Nazi spy machine of George Bush was put in place. http://rt.com/news/putin-rt-visit-broadcasting-center-530/

Russia is now more righteous than America:

A bill that stigmatizes Russia's gay community and bans the distribution of information about homosexuality to children was overwhelmingly approved by the lower house of parliament [June 11].

...The measure is part of an effort to promote traditional Russian values as opposed to Western liberalism, which the Kremlin and the Russian Orthodox Church see as corrupting Russian youth and contributing to the protests against Putin's rule

You are not going to convince me that freedom of expression is synonymous with righteousness. "Before the vote, gay rights activists attempted to hold a 'kissing rally' outside the State Duma.." PUKE in your face. They need to go back into the closet; lock the door.

There was a good chance, in my mind, that the recent scandals hitting Obama were produced by leakers on the Hillary side of the Democrat donkey. Then, to support that notion, someone leaked something that was embarrassing to Hillary:

A former senior investigator with the State Department's criminal investigative unit has turned whistleblower and alleged to both the media and Congress that senior staff within State Department [i.e. people smack beside Hillary] covered up investigations into appalling behavior committed by members of Hillary Clinton's security staff and our ambassador to Belgium. One of those alleged to have interfered was Cheryl Mills, Hillary's chief of staff.

The case in which Clinton enforcer Mills allegedly intervened centered upon Brett McGurk, Obama’s nominee to be US ambassador to Iraq.

McGurk's expected nomination fell apart after a computer hack [or was it the FBI using the NSA Internet data?] exposed his racy e-mails and an extramarital affair with Wall Street Journal reporter Gina Chon.

...Mills is a longtime associate of the Clintons, going back to 1992, and was also at the center of the first scandal to hit Hillary's State Department: Benghazi. Gregory Hicks, the former Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya, testified before Congress that Mills instructed him not to cooperate with the Congressional investigation into the September 11 terror attacks.

...Investigators called the use of prostitutes by Clinton's security agents "endemic."

You recall how the FBI never did an investigation in the Benghazi crime because the FIB is in political cahoots with Obama. The FBI merely feigned doing an investigation. In the same way, the FBI is so concerned (sarcasm) with the IRS scandal that: "There is no evidence that the FBI has contacted a single tea party group in its criminal investigation of the Internal Revenue Service, according to the groups the IRS abused...But in separate testimony before congressional investigators [June 13], FBI Director Robert Mueller seemed completely unaware of the progress of any such investigation." What a cursed farce.

Is the following sick or what:

The White House said on [June 14] it would nominate six people for U.S. ambassadorships, including three who were closely connected to President Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign.

The move follows Obama's nomination of two top fundraisers to high-level administration posts: Penny Pritzker for Commerce Secretary and Tom Wheeler for chairman of the Federal Communications Commission.

The people representing the country abroad are ever-more a reflection of the Obama embarrassment, people who whole-heartedly see nothing wrong with the latest scandals while the world they appeal to clearly sees. The voice of America has gum disease and a foul odor. The plaque, which has hardened to a defensive shield, has yellowed the smile so that no one smiles back anymore. The Information Super Highway is a mess, strewn with eyeballs:

Canada's government on Monday declined to say whether it was using data gathered by a secret U.S. government eavesdropping program, but confirmed its own secret signals intelligence agency was monitoring foreign phone and internet traffic.

...Pressed by opposition legislators as to whether Canada was making use of Prism data, Defense Minister Peter MacKay did not answer the question.

Instead, he referred to the practices of Canada's top secret Communication Security Establishment (CSE), a branch of the defense ministry that specializes in gathering signals intelligence abroad.

"CSE does not target communications of Canadians. This is foreign intelligence. This is something that has been happening for years," he told the House of Commons.

...MacKay confirmed a report...that said CSE...runs a global electronic eavesdropping program designed to detect patterns of suspicious activity.

But wait, liar, every call from a foreign location is apt to include a Canadian on the other end. And 99.99 percent of foreign calls are from non-terrorists. Does this justify MONITORING foreign calls? Could you please define that term a little better? Could we have some details here? "Eavesdropping" doesn't sound like they are merely recording technical data. Hello? Is anybody there? Yes, and that's the problem.

Isn't the United States a foreign land? How many phone calls from America is Canada monitoring? How many phone calls from Canada is America monitoring? How many phone calls from America and Canada is Britain monitoring? Just how many eyeballs are on our private data, anyway??? Aren't they all ashamed of themselves?

And they want to install spy systems on computers before they are sold so that their eyeballs and ear drums are in our own houses, to hear and see us even when not using a phone line. This situation is already here in the computer cameras and microphones in your computer. Cover your computer camera / microphone with tape if you don't want some government goon peering at you from your own computer. They can do it. Your computer has an identification number, and all the computers that you ever owned and used online should find their way into your beastly book that the government has compiled against your will and/or without your permission. If the people allow this, they will hire many more goons to partake in live monitoring of our private lives. There will no longer be such a thing as privacy. How many are employed now:

National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands [a hundred thousand if this keeps up] of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.

The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls [shocking admission of what NSA was just denying publicly].

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

...The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden...

...McConnell [vice chairman at Booz Allen Hamilton, Snowden's employer] said during a separate congressional appearance around the same time that he believed the president had the constitutional authority, no matter what the law actually says, to order domestic spying without warrants.

Now we hear what we knew already, that the FBI and NSA were lying to us. Eric Holder needs to go to jail. Obama needs to be impeached. McConnell is a hypocrite; he does not represent the people.

It all has little to do with fighting terror. It cannot have anything to do with fighting criminals of all other types because the secret court won't allow PRISM for such use. That in itself tells you that it's a wrong method to use. Where are the passenger jets downed by al-Qaeda? Where are the subway attacks in the United States? Where are the Iraq-like bombings in the United States? Where are the suicide bombers? It's the latter that would send the United States a message, and yet it's not being used. There is a reason that these things are not taking place, and that reason is not the spy program. Nor is it the tightened security, which can never be anywhere near tight enough to stop suicide bombers. The reason is that there is no al-Qaeda monster attacking the United States. Besides, far more American soldiers have died since Bush went to war in Afghanistan than the predicted number of soldiers killed abroad by terror acts.

Here's a story of concern to us out this week:

The Department of Homeland Security is purchasing hundreds of items of protective gear for its fleet of Federal Protective Service officers in order to prepare for "riot control situations," increasing concerns that the federal agency is readying for domestic unrest.

...As we reported last month, FPS officers were used to guard an IRS building in St. Louis during a Tea Party protest against the federal agency's discrimination targeting conservative groups.

In my opinion, Homeland Security and its ilk will CAUSE riots when the government intimidates a certain part of the population beyond break point. I say the government is desirous of "excitement."

Below is a thing out this week in case you had doubts about Obama's anti-Christian nature. In very recent months, we have heard the military going anti-Christian, a thing that was unheard of under George Bush. Now this:

The Obama Administration "strongly objects" to a proposed amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act on Wednesday that would have protected the religious rights of soldiers -- including evangelical Christian service members who are facing growing hostility towards their religion.

The amendment was authored by Rep. John Fleming, R-La. It would have "required the Armed Forces to accommodate 'actions and speech' reflecting the conscience, moral, principles or religious beliefs of the member."

..."With its statement, the White House is now endorsing military reprimands of members who keep a Bible on their desk or express a religious belief," Fleming told Fox News. "This administration is aggressively hostile towards religious beliefs that it deems to be politically incorrect."

...Fleming introduced the amendment after a series of high-profile incidents involving attacks on religious liberty within the military- including an Air Force officer who was told to remove a Bible from his desk because it might give the impression he was endorsing a religion...The Obama administration has joined forces with those who are attacking the religious freedoms...this administration has gone beyond accommodating the anti-Christian activists who want to remove any vestige of Christianity from the military, to aiding them by blocking this bipartisan measure.

If you have been given any doubts that what's going on is illegal, just look at how quickly a lawyer is acting to take the trolls to court:

Former Justice Department prosecutor Larry Klayman amended an existing lawsuit against Verizon and a slew of Obama administration officials Monday to make it the first class-action lawsuit in response...

Klayman told U.S. News he will file a second class-action lawsuit Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia targeting government officials and each of the nine companies listed in a leaked National Security Agency slideshow as participants in the government's PRISM program.

According to the slideshow, the PRISM program allows government agents direct, real-time access to the servers of nine major tech companies, including AOL, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, PalTalk, Skype, Yahoo! and YouTube.

A court case permits the lawyer(s) a "discovery process" wherein he/they can demand information, from the opposition, relevant to the case. There is opportunity here to expose the realities further. The first two people in Klayman's class-action suit are at topic below:

...On Sunday, Charles and Mary Anne Strange -- a Philadelphia couple whose son Michael, a US Navy Seal, was killed in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan in 2011 (see related story) -- joined the suit as a class action.

"Somebody has to be held accountable for my son's death. Thirty brave Americans, the biggest loss in the Afghan war. And that's when I started asking questions, that's when my phone got tapped," Strange said.

Strange claims he heard tapping noises while on the phone and he says he started getting odd texts shortly after his son's death.

“I called Verizon, ‘I have a text 001 and 002’ and I called them up and I said ‘who’s this?’ and they said it’s somebody listening in from the United States, and someone from Afghanistan,” Strange explained.

The plaintiffs say they have been highly critical of the current administration and are likely targets.

And that's what the globalists did: murder the SEALs in the helicopter, and then monitor the phones of the families and friends to assure that the truth didn't get out.

Race for Global Supremacy

Spying is a part of superpower ambition, but it's self-defeating. Here's an example of how-so:

Turkey and Russia have angrily rounded on the British government and demanded an explanation following revelations that their politicians and senior officials were spied on and bugged during the 2009 G20 summit in London.

The foreign ministry in Ankara said it was unacceptable that the British government had intercepted phonecalls and monitored the computers of Turkey's finance minister as well as up to 15 others from his visiting delegation. If confirmed, the eavesdropping operation on a Nato ally was "scandalous", it added.

The ministry summoned the UK's ambassador to Ankara to hear Turkey's furious reaction in person. A spokesman at the foreign ministry read out an official statement saying: "The allegations in the Guardian are very worrying … If these allegations are true, this is going to be scandalous for the UK. At a time when international co-operation depends on mutual trust, respect and transparency, such behaviour by an allied country is unacceptable."

...The revelations were also carried in a report by the South African Press Association, which began: "Documents leaked by US former spy Edward Snowden appeared to show Britain spied on G20 delegates during meetings in London back in 2009, Britain's Guardian newspaper reported Monday."

It's like jumping along on one leg to be a superpower ruling the world that hates you. This comes as Obama wants Turkey's friendship to oust Assad and to weaken Iran. There seems to be no genuine hope of restoring the reset button with Russia. The Russian people are scoffing, and Americans continue to accuse the world while refusing to see their own shame in this regard. In fact, half of Americans are willing to adopt and caress their own government-spy machine, rather than condemn it, for the sake of contending with the nations who frown on it. Liberal America does not admit it's own shame, and is able to spin evil into good. Let's all snoop secretly on one another, shall we, and be friends (sarcasm).

Snowden has already come out to expose further details that goes beyond alliances with Internet companies. American trolls are also into the hacking enterprise:

U.S. intelligence agents have been hacking computer networks around the world for years, apparently targeting fat data pipes that push immense amounts of data around the Internet, NSA leaker Edward Snowden told the South China Morning Post on Wednesday.

Among some 61,000 reported targets of the National Security Agency, Snowden said, are thousands of computers in China -- which U.S. officials have increasingly criticized as the source of thousands of attacks on U.S. military and commercial networks. China has denied such attacks.

It is very interesting that Obama had just came out to accuse China of spying on US computers, as though he was anticipating Snowden's words above. I find it hard to believe that Snowden would be lying concerning his accusation, and then I find it easy to believe that Obama is lying concerning his accusation. If Snowden wants to be taken seriously by a court, and because he's expected in a court after capture, it's hard to think he would fabricate this story of the United States hacking into international computers. It's no minor accusation. It reveals what I already knew, that the international snooping has other political matters at heart aside from terrorism. "Snowden told the paper that some of the targets included the Chinese University of Hong Kong, public officials and students."

The IRS has just been caught getting prices and details on, and even ordering, its own spy equipment, but no sooner did this story break that there was a headline saying that the order was canceled. Hee hee. You can see where this was going. Lowly nations are ashamed of the "super-power," and dictators are smirking.

Look at the damage one whistle blower alone can make on the globalists. Imagine, if they tried martial law, how traitors would be created instantly out of the woodwork. For those who are open to the idea that the NSA scandal is a purposeful design of the government -- to reveal the full scope of government spying in an effort to intimidate the people and make whistle-blowing seem less attractive or more dangerous -- there is the coincidence of the following story coming out just now:

The White House announced the opening of a new government supercomputing center in northern Maryland this week. Patricia Falcone [Conteville line] of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP) attended a ceremony to mark the occasion along with Maryland Senator Ben Cardin and various army officials:

...The new ARL Supercomputing Center...will provide state-of-the art high performance computing capabilities as well as extraordinary capacities in advanced high-speed networking and data analysis, providing unprecedented benefits to the Army, the Department of Defense, and the Nation as a whole.

The new facility is located just steps from the building that originally housed ENIAC, the "world's first electronic, programmable, general-purpose computer."

Does that picture make you feel warm all over? The EU is apparently not feeling very dreamy about this: "Viviane Reding, the EU's Justice Commissioner, wrote a letter on Monday to US Attorney General Eric Holder demanding 'swift and concrete' answers about the [PRISM] spy scheme when they meet in Dublin on Friday [June 14]." She's of course wondering whether her own communications are being watched. No one knows anymore, and no one can, of course, trust the "reassuring" statements of the American spy people. You realize that they are not spying on the low classes, but on government agents, most of all. The spies want to know the most-intimate secrets of the EU. That's the basic job of spies.

It could be argued that the spirit of espionage will be the warhead directly responsible for Armageddon. Love can be defined as good-will toward all men, but spy machines facilitate a different type of spirit, and a willingness to kill on behalf of achieving supremacy and furthering selfish ambition.

It's not necessarily true that the shock expressed by Reding and others is sincere. It could be faked shock in order to give the impression that the EU is not itself involved to the same extent in its own spy programs. Reding is fully expected to say what she said: "Programmes such as PRISM and the laws on the basis of which such programmes are authorised could have grave adverse consequences for the fundamental rights of EU citizens."http://www.france24.com/en/20130612-eu-warns-us-grave-consequences-intel-scandal

It's going to be hard to know who are the real NWO tools versus the people of traditional good. There will be betrayals of all kinds in this new war. Revelation tells that the world will generally go along with it, praising its ability to secure security. Look at how the Internet giants sat down with the government before making a damage-control statement to their customers:

Technology giants Facebook and Microsoft said Friday night that they have received thousands of requests [this is an anti-government admission] from U.S. government agencies to turn over user data in the just last six months of 2012.

Representatives of both companies said that after negotiations with national security officials their companies have been given permission to make new but still very limited revelations about government orders requesting user data.

Fault. No good. If they really want to look like they are on-side with their customers, and angry with security officials for twisting their arms, the Internet companies will need to break from the government and betray it cleanly in this regard. As it is, it would appear that there was an agreement to leak only what the government agreed with. That's tantamount to negotiations with the kidnapper, encouraging the kidnapper to kidnap yet again on another day. The article adds: "Representatives of both companies said that after negotiations with national security officials their companies have been given permission to make new but still very limited revelations about government orders requesting user data...Facebook is only allowed to talk about total numbers [of requests for data] and must give no specifics." In other words, we are told zero, a big fat zero, about the ways in which the government has been abusing the Internet companies. The government will continue to abuse, and the Internet companies will continue to offer their bodies in this obscenity because the companies are refusing to strike the government with fear for how it's forcing their hand. Now is the time, if ever they wanted to squeal loudly. Instead, the companies are purring on the government's lap while being stroked on their under bellies.

"Facebook said it has a compliance rate of 79 percent on government requests." Fault. No good. It would be easy to fake or exaggerate rejected requests. What the customers need to see is the Internet companies taking the government to court. That would do it. They can't say they haven't got the money or the clout behind them for legal action. Now is the time to take the government to court, to tell a judge that a secret court forced the companies to betray its customers. It's obscene for this to take place in a democracy. The judges of the secret court need to be jailed. There is a long period of precedent in the years before George Bush that this sort of thing is illegal.

For it's part, Yahoo did take the NSA to court prior to this Snowden scandal breaking:

Court documents obtained by the New York Times show that the Internet company had initially refused to join the PRISM spying program, insisting that the broad national security requests seeking users’ personal information were unconstitutional.

However, the secret court operating under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) sided with the NSA and forced Yahoo's hand.

Is it really true that China is spying on America? Here's a story on it, and note that Obama is a leaker when it befits his agenda:

...Then, two weeks ago, White House officials leaked to the press that Obama intended to raise privately with Xi the highly contentious issue of China's widespread use of computer hacking to steal U.S. government, military, and commercial secrets. According to a Chinese diplomat in Washington who spoke in confidence, Beijing was furious about the sudden elevation of cybersecurity and Chinese espionage on the meeting's agenda. According to a diplomatic source in Washington, the Chinese government was even angrier that the White House leaked the new agenda item to the press before Washington bothered to tell Beijing about it.

Why was this accusation leaked just as Snowden was poised to release his accusation in the opposite direction? Is it logical that Snowden is a tool of Obama rather than Obama's enemy? I don't think so. I doubt that, in such a case, Snowden would locate himself in Hong Kong, right in the red-dragon's throat. It seems more logical that Obama, who makes sure to spy on all spies, especially the new ones coming in like Snowden, had reason to suspect that Snowden was up to something when he disappeared. Obama then leaked a lie in order to justify what he figured Snowden was going to release: America's hacking of Chinese computers. Note in the quote above that Obama leaked the accusation just before the 1st of June, during the time that Snowden was absent from his job, absent from his home, absent from his ordinary life. Thus, the crux of this Snowden story is changing from the war on terror to the hacking of the red dragon. The article continues:

But Washington never publicly responded to Huang's allegation [that America is hacking Chinese computers], and nobody in the U.S. media seems to have bothered to ask the White House if there is a modicum of truth to the Chinese charges.

It turns out that the Chinese government's allegations are essentially correct. According to a number of confidential sources, a highly secretive unit of the National Security Agency (NSA), the U.S. government's huge electronic eavesdropping organization, called the Office of Tailored Access Operations, or TAO, has successfully penetrated Chinese computer and telecommunications systems for almost 15 years, generating some of the best and most reliable intelligence information about what is going on inside the People's Republic of China.

While this is not at all unbelievable, we must not forget that this was not the reason that Snowden blew the whistle. He sacrificed his life to inform the world that the United States was taking the liberty to access all emails and similar communications, of every person, business, and government in the world, if possible. But we know it wouldn't stop there, for the government would also like to have our hard-drives fully visible to them, and in this regard I have always felt that government spies would seek to build their own computers for retail sale that have built-in measures (software OR hardware) to assure easy spying. My question has always been: has Microsoft been collaborating / conspiring with American spies to produce software installed in every computer from the point of computer sale? Is there some anti-spy software sold with computers everywhere that is in reality a spy tool for the American government? It seems to be a natural progression to expect such a snake with it's eyes inside of our computers.

About two years ago, I deleted the McAfee anti-spy tool that came with the purchase of my computer. I felt that it was itself a spy tool. I now find this article:

McAfee unit, which makes Internet security software, regularly cooperates with the NSA, FBI and the CIA, for example, and is a valuable partner because of its broad view of malicious Internet traffic, including espionage operations by foreign powers, according to one of the four people, who is familiar with the arrangement.

The way to protect yourself is to have one computer for private purposes that never goes online. As the Republicans do not appear poised to change the way NSA operates, the threat to Christians goes on. But always know, we are in the Majority just because our God is more powerful than their snake. It is important to God that the snake be permitted to take us to the edge of the cliff before the Flashing in the Sky appears.

The faith of many will fail them in this walk to the cliff; blessed are those who make it there, for they will fly off and, rather than fall to the rocks below, arise to the skies. Impossible? Ridiculous? If you belong to Him, you will be given the faith to believe this. If you know, at that critical time, that prophecy was fulfilled exactly as it was predicted, your faith will be much stronger. That's why God gave end-time prophecy, so that we could derive the needed faith to go to the edge for Him.

Now back to the foreignpolicy.com article:

Hidden away inside the massive NSA headquarters complex at Fort Meade, Maryland...TAO is a mystery to many NSA employees. Relatively few NSA officials have complete access to information about TAO because of the extraordinary sensitivity of its operations, and it requires a special security clearance...The door leading to its ultramodern operations center is protected by armed guards, an imposing steel door that can only be entered by entering the correct six-digit code into a keypad, and a retinal scanner to ensure that only those individuals specially cleared for access get through the door.

It sounds like Chaos Headquarters. It ends: "According to former NSA officials interviewed for this article, TAO's mission is simple. It collects intelligence information on foreign targets by surreptitiously hacking into their computers and telecommunications systems, cracking passwords, compromising the computer security systems protecting the targeted computer, stealing the data stored on computer hard drives, and then copying all the messages and data traffic passing within the targeted email and text-messaging systems. The technical term of art used by NSA to describe these operations is computer network exploitation (CNE). " But I thought that this sort of thing was wrong. Everyone teaches that computer hacking is wrong. So, why does the government lead by hypocrisy? Doesn't it have to do with Condemnation?

Isn't this bad attitude going to lead to war? "TAO is also responsible for developing the information that would allow the United States to destroy or damage foreign computer and telecommunications systems with a cyberattack if so directed by the president." Does Obama really want to fool in this way with Russia and China together? He has no choice because mankind, instead of operating on goodwill toward all, has come to mistrust the other in the race to global supremacy.

The problem I have with the article above is that's it's too revealing, like a huge leak. The article also reads like an advertisement of the spies informing that they have arrived to a point where we are all slaves to their eavesdropping, like it or not, there's nothing we can do about it:

...the ROC [Remote Operations Center at Fort Meade] break into the targeted computer systems electronically using special software designed by TAO's own corps of software designers and engineers specifically for this purpose, download the contents of the computers' hard drives, and place software implants or other devices called "buggies" inside the computers' operating systems, which allows TAO intercept operators at Fort Meade to continuously monitor the email and/or text-messaging traffic coming in and out of the computers or hand-held devices.

Yep, they put a bug or spy program in your own computer, and even watch you type if they choose too. They don't need to "fix" computers at the point of retail sale using this "weapon."

I don't oppose the cleansing action that these spy systems can produce in making it harder for criminals to operate online, but it's still wrong, and is prone to abuse because the spies are a near-reflection of the criminals. We should ask why "ROC" was chosen for this program? Is it in honor of Rockefellers? The article reads like a willing leak where it calls hackers, "gifted computer scientists." That phrase portrays the hackers like saviors. Foreignpolicy.com wants us to praise computer hackers.

If you recall my topics when emphasizing the Glassl surname that Adolf Hitler's father had married, you may be interested to know that the editor-in-chief of Foreign Policy has a Glasser surname. The founder, Samuel Huntington, of Foreign Policy was a Yale product. His journalistic expertise goes back through his mother's Sanborn surname, which shares red-on-white stars with the Glass / Gleason surnames that I trace to "Kyle" and "Cole," then further back to the Colapis river of the Japodes, and to neighboring Servitium, home of the Maezaei line to Mieszko's...who put out the Pollocks of GLASgow, the entity from which Adolf Hitler's nephew chose his fake/alias surname, "Stuart-Houston." Adolf Hitler's father also married a Polzl surname, you see, which was Adolf's mother (compare Mieske's, Pohls and Coles).

The nephew moved to Long Island in New York, where he has sons. Unfortunately, Samuel Huntington's birth in New York is not given a more-specific location at his Wikipedia article. Hitler's nephew was traced by me to a Dein family in Idaho. This Dein family had married a person with SCHERIFF surname living previously in the same area of central Long Island that Hitler's nephew resided in, and here I now find that the SHERIFF and Sanborn surnames were both first found in the same place, in Warwickshire. That place traces to Poland's capital city, Warsaw (in MASSovia), and then the Arms of Warsaw is a mermaid, symbol of the Glass Crest.

I was struck by all this because president George Herbert Walker Bush was, according to a deathbed confession of Hitler's right-hand man (Otto Skorzeny), born as George Herbert SCHERF, son of one of Hitler's spies. George Herbert Walker "Bush" (his family married the Walker surname) went on to become the leader of the CIA spy ring. Coincidence?

I was convinced of Skorzeny's confession when discovering that the Schere/Scherf and Walkers both use roses on stems. Later, because the Dein family above had to do with one Jeffrey Dein who married woman with Surbrook surname, the SHURbrooks/SHERbrooks and SHERwoods became suspect as a part of the Schere / Scherf / Skor/Score family of terms. I now find that the Sherwood Coat is a perfect reflection of the Sanborn Coat. The Sherwood Crest shares roses on stems with the Schere/Scherf Coat, you see. It means that the Sanborn side of Samuel Huntington may have been of a Nazi-spy ring (which of course makes the founder of Foreign Policy a Nazi suspect of the Bush kind, especially as he and George Bush both attended Yale).

We even find the Huntingdon location in the Sherwood write-up: "The [Sherwood] surname is probably best known in reference to the fabled Sherwood Forest which has been immortalized by the legendary Robin Hood, who according to legend was the Earl of Huntingdon..."

Scharfs were first found in the same place (Yorkshire) as Bush's and Walkers, and use the Rockefeller trefoil symbol.

Aha! When on this topic, I had stressed the Hazels and House's as part of the line to the namers of Islip. Both surnames use the same leaf design. But just now, I took a stab at deciphering the "seabird" term to which the Scharf surname traces itself, and entering "Seeber," the same leaf came up!

If they spy on political enemies outside the country, they will spy on political enemies inside with much-more fervor, as we just discovered with the IRS scandal. But we knew it was happening even before the NSA scandal broke. They don't merely make a list of political enemies, but they devise methods of destroying them. They don't intend to destroy them softly. The harder they can get away with it safely, that's how they will do it. You who praise this effort today can be the enemy, not tomorrow, but today.

By the time that the 666 commercial system is advanced, the Rockefellers of the world will not only have a list of Bible-serious Christians, but will have plans laid out (some of them active already) to thwart them, to spoil them, to destroy them if necessary. I can guarantee you that the Rockefellers of the world will work to force a small public face on websites like mine, while lavishing liberal websites a large public face. The political enemy will be quashed by the spoilage / destruction of its educational channels. The IRS scandal taught us that this is happening, not tomorrow, but today.

On page three of the Foreign-Policy article above: "It is important to note that TAO is not supposed to work against domestic targets in the United States or its possessions. This is the responsibility of the FBI, which is the sole U.S. intelligence agency chartered for domestic telecommunications surveillance." Oh, well, okay, the NSA hackers are not to spy internally, but the FBI can have access to ROC methods and ROC data, using them toward its internal spy machine. A very convenient marriage.

The writer of the article has an Aid surname, which lead straight to Rockefellers. Before showing it to you, let me remind that the Roquefeuil location (beside Rennes-le-Chateau) was traced to ROStock (depicted in heraldry with a rooster), where the Sinclair-RUS Vikings had been as they developed from the Varni dragon = proto-vikings = criminals. These became the founders of the United States, and in fact, as ROSicrucians, they developed from British spies of the 17th century.

The Aid/Ade surname was first found in Berwickshire, where the Rhodian "round table" traces. Berwickshire is a part of the English-Scottish border area, where ROXburghshire is also found that housed the Rockefellers. The house of Rodes (see Henry IV of Rodes) married Roquefeuil about the time that Pollocks in Scotland were forming as a branch of Rockefellers, all descended from "the tanner" of Falaise, the family married by Sinclair vikings. The Pollocks were a sept of Maxwells who had their home in Roxburghshire so that Maxwells and Rockefellers were virtually one. Maxwells are from the 600 Benjamites that I say had the number 6 as a favorite number for a reason I have yet to discover.

The first thing to note is that the Jewish Pollocks use a bend (diagonal bar) in the colors of the Aid/Ade bend. The Aid/Ade Crest is the leopard face coupled with the fleur-de-lys as used by Herod-liner Coppers/Coppers. The Aid/Ade bend has leopard faces that ought to trace to the leopards used by the Arms of the Normandy that belonged to the Sinclair vikings. The Rhodes' use a leopard in their Crest.

One can glean that "Ade" and other variations of this surname should be a part of the Atkin(son) bloodline because "kin" is a suffix. Going first to the Atkinsons, we find them using the double-headed Maxwell eagle in the colors of the Pollock / Aid/Ade bend. The Atkinson Chief uses three stars in the colors of the Washington-surname stars, which are the colors of the Glass, Kyle, and Sanborn stars.

Going to the Scottish Atkin/Aiken surname, we find the Sinclair rooster design, and then the colors of the Sinclair cross is used by English Atkins, first found in the same area as the Atkinsons. English Atkins throw in a "Vincit" motto term that's code for the Vincents of the Rennes-le-Chateau entity.

The Atkinsons and Atkins are said to derive in "Adam," but "Edom" is more likely (if it's correct at all). Checking, we find that the Borderlands Adams use a fat cross in the colors of the Scottish-Pollock saltire cross. These Adams were first found in Annandale, where Bruces operated, explaining why the alternative-English Atkin Coat uses the Bruce lion...from the Hebrews (i.e. Eburovices) out of Brescia and into Evreux. Edomites (expected to use red) were Hebrews when they were related to Esau.

The Atkins can be traced to Caiaphas / Ananias merely by way of their being in cahoots with the Annandale Bruces, but now I see a way to trace Atkins to Caiaphas lines at the Cavari theater. That's where the Keys/Kays trace, and then the Mackays, who have proven to be a Maxwell branch, are also "CAW," while the Borderlands Adams are shown with a MacCAW variation.

Thus, the Adams and the related Atkins / Aids were in cahoots with Maxwells and related Mackays from the Avignon key symbol. To prove this all the more, here's the Borderlands-Adam write-up: "First found in Annandale where they held a family seat at KYNEmund." It just so happens that the Scottish Keys/Kays use "Kynd KYNN Knawne Kepe" for a motto. They were first found in the same place (Yorkshire) as English Bruces and Maxwells, where the Edomite Bush's were first found with Wagers and Walkers, all of whom trace to the Warnow river (home of the Varni) flowing into Rostock. That Varni theater is home also to a SCHWERin location smacking of where the Schere's/Scherfs may have lived.

Some say that York was founded under that name by Danish vikings (suspect from the 600 Danites), and then the Sinclairs had been Danes. But York was known as "Eboracum," much like "Ebroicum," otherwise known as the Eburovices. Clearly, the Bruce's of Yorkshire were from the Eburovices, and in fact the Abreu/Abruzzo/ABRUSSI surname uses two lions in the colors of the two leopards that are the Arms of Normandy, suggesting that the Rollo family had merged chiefly with the Abreu/Abruzzo line that named Evreux.

The Abreu/Abruzzo surname was first found in Padua, near Venice. The Italian Fallis/FAILLE surname, using the RoqueFEUIL treFOIL symbol, was first found in Venice. The Scottish Fallis/Falls surname, using the same Coat as the Italian Fallis', were first found in the same place (Lothian, ROSlin) as where the Sinclairs proper settled. It's clear that we are on the Falaise bloodline here as it formed the Rockefellers.

So, there you have it: the Aid surname of the writer of the spy article above, which article emphasizes the activities of ROC, traces to Rockefellers. But I can go further because I traced the Aiken variation of Atkins to a line of Aachen (chief location of Carolingian Franks) that goes back with Merovingian Franks (said to descend from the Veneti) to "EUGANeo" in Padua (home of the Veneti), where the Abreu/Abruzzo surname could be expected in archaic times. We just saw the Atkin / Aid / Adam line connect with Pollocks (said by some to be from Clovis himself), and so see that Scottish Pollocks use "Audacter" in their motto while EUGENes/Ewens use "Audaciter."

Let's move on to Irish Adams (heart, a Bruce symbol round-about) using nearly the motto of Jeffersons/Jephsons, the latter being suspect with the Jabesh (= proto-Jupiter) side of the 600 Benjamites at Rimini, not far south of the Veneti and just around the corner from proto-Maxwells at rock-depicted Reka/Rijeka (uses a version of the black Maxwell eagle) in the land of proto-Romans: the Japodes (i.e. the latter were from "Jabesh"). It's hard to say whether the white Jefferson griffin with besant in it's mouth is the white Kay/Key griffin with key in it's mouth, but the besant theme of Jeffersons can be linked to the York saltire, itself a version of the Cooper/Copper saltire, because English Jeffersons use a version of the Cooper saltire. That's why Jeffersons trace to Copparo, near Rimini.

Copparo is expected to derive in "Kypris," the alternative name of Aphrodite at the root of Abreu's/Abruzzo's, but note that she evolved into Venus, likely symbol of the Veneti. The Veneti are known to derive in the Heneti Paphlagonians that were encoded in mythical ANTENor, and then the Coopers/Coppers and Jeffersons share the leopard-face symbol with the ANTON surname. The Cavari were traced to "Cabeiri," a devilish cult operated by worshipers of Aphrodite and her husband, HEPHEAStus, he being suspect from "Jabesh" and therefore as the proto-Jeffersons. Hephaestus was otherwise known as Dionysus (both were on Lemnos and both were lame / crippled from infancy), who was anciently given the leopard symbol.

Again, the Adams and Jeffersons use a similar motto, both using the phrase, "cruce salus." The motto of German Adams use "Cruz," likely for elements from mythical Creusa, mother of the Romans, and wife of Aeneas (= son of Aphrodite), a Heneti suspect from Aenus at the mouth of the Hebros river, home of Aphrodite's Hebrews, and just on-shore of Lemnos. Having thus traced Adams to Aphrodite, we can prove further that "Kabeiri / Cabeiri" traces to "Cavari" at Avignon, because German Adams happen to use "quies" in their motto, code for the Kay/Key / Shay/Shay bloodline. In myth, Kay was made a son of both a Cyner (hence, the Kay/Key motto is explained) and an Ector, and then both Ectors and German Adams use the sun. This might not be a big deal, as many Coats use the sun, but then the Ectors are said to be Antors too. Here's from the Ector write-up: "According to Arthurian legend, Sir Ector (sometimes Hector, Antor, or Ectorius) was the father of Sir Kay and the foster father of King Arthur."

Fulbert the Tanner's Moray Family

GD sent in a webpage on Fulbert the "tanner" of Falaise from recent discussions on that topic. I don't ever recall seeing the webpage showing that the family was surnamed, "Tonnerre," even before "the tanner." It gives his father as Guy II de Tonnerre...which may explain why Sinclairs share a gold rooster with the French Guy/Guai surname...first found in Savoy, not far from Montferrat. The Tonnerre page above shows "Wido" as a version of "Guy," and then "Wido" is a version of "Guido," I am sure, suggesting that the Tonnerre's were at the Tanaro river in Montferrat, and that this line that married the Sinclair vikings out of Rostock was from the Montferrat marriage to Guido Guerra.

The article below: "Although traditionally presented to be a common tradesman (a Tanner), Fuhlburt appears to have been a minor son of Guy I [I think it meant "II"] de Tonnerre and employed as the Duke's Chamberlain at the castle of Falaise [Normandy]." As I've been tracing the Sinclairs of More (Norway) to Moray for years without having the historical evidence, it was very pleasing and compelling to find in this article that Fulbert Tonnerre was married to Doda out of Moray:

The Scottish clan histories of MacEth [or "MacHeth"] and MacBeth indicate Fulbert Tanner's widow (Doda) returned to Scotland from Normandy following her husband's death and that Doada subsequently married the Mormaer of Moray. This would indicate that that Tonnerre's daughter Arlette (a noble name) was likely the half sister of Macbeth.

MacBeth ruled at Moray, and his ancestry was from MacAlpin...who very-surprisingly traced to Guido Guerra not many weeks ago. As crazy as it seemed, there was solid heraldic evidence for a trace of the Guido line to Kenneth MacAlpin. In Doda's article, Herleva (otherwise known as Arlette), the Conqueror's mother, is said to be a daughter of Doda. That could easily explain the Sinclair line's ownership of Moray.

As I identified Fulbert Tonnerre as a close relation (perhaps even father) of Fulbert "the Saxon" de Pollock, we may suddenly be discovering why the latter's son, Peter Pollock, ended up ruling out of Moray. The Pollocks are traced to Clovis, a Merovingian king that was half from a Salian-Frank background. In the article above, Fulbert Tonnerre is said to have a Salian-Frank mother. In this picture, Fulbert "the Saxon" was a Salian too, which makes sense where the Frank surname uses the Pollock saltire.

Reminder: I trace RENfrew, where Pollocks were first found, including Peter Pollock, to "Reno," the river of Guido Guerra and his associates. I traced "Reno" also to "Rainier/Renier" of Montferrat, the father of the one (William V) whose daughter married Guido Guerra III. From "Rainier," who was also "REGNier," one can spot the naming of "RAGNvald," father of Rollo Sinclair. There is also a Reghin location on the Mures river (Transylvania/Romania) that I trace to Ragnvald at Moray.

The latter location was also "Moravia" to the Scots, which reminds me of the trace I made from George, son of king Andrew I of Hungary, to Moray. I had found an historical record claiming that George was in Scotland in 1055...during the reign of MacBeth. I reasoned that he was in Scotland to support MacBeth, or perhaps to defeat him in his war against Malcolm III, the Scottish king (as of 1057) who supported a host of Hungarian nobles. I knew that the Kabars who were fundamental in the make-up of the first Hungarians had been from the Murat-named Kabars on the Mures river, and so one has good reason in that alone to trace the naming of Moray (and More) to the namers of the Mures, but also to the Kabars there, which should explain why "ABERDEEN," beside Moray, looks like "KABARDINo," home in Caucasia of Kabars.

Aberdeen is known to be the home where the Hungarian Leslie's settled, but of course the Scots of that time did not want the Scottish people to know that the Scottish throne was based largely on Hungarians and Kabars (which is why "Andrew's Cross" (i.e. the Scottish flag) and the Ross clan beside Moray are deceptively traced to Andrews other than king Andrew).

The "major" motto term of the English Peter surname could very well be in honor of "Magyar," the non-Kabar side of the first Hungarians. In fact, the English Peters share a black-on-gold lion with the English George surname, suggesting that Peter Pollock at Moray came into contact with the line of George (son of king Andrew)...known to be the father of the first Drummonds proper. The Drummond write-up: "This distinguished family is said to be descended anciently from a Prince Andreas, youngest son of the King of Hungary, and came into Scotland in the train of Queen Margaret [wife of Malcolm III)." Note how the Drummond Coat is a version of the DaMORY/Amori Coat (could be using the Leslie bend). The Damory/Amori Crest even shares a (blue) talbot dog with the George Crest, keeping in mind that the blue wolf is a HUN symbol.

I could not find a Tonnerre surname, but entering "Tonner" gets the same "maunch" or "sleeve" as the Tony/Toni surname. This same symbol is used by Hastings, important because the Conqueror conquered England at the battle of Hastings. It's important because it tends to prove that Tonners and Tony's were from "the tanner" line in the Conqueror's mother. The Tonner and Tony "sleeve" is in the colors of the leopard used by Italian Anton(y)s, which has the potential to trace the Normandy leopards, and the Tonnerre family, to Mark Antony.

I have linked Mark Antony to his quasi-ally, Antipater, father of Herod "the great." Antipater married Kypros, the woman from Edom whom I trace to the Coppers/Coopers (leopards), first found in the same place as the Hastings. The Hastings write-up: "First found in Sussex, where the family were descended from Robert of Hastings, who having assisted William the Conqueror at the Battle of Hastings, was given the town of Hastings in gratitude...One of the first records of the name was of Henry de Hastings (c.1235–c.1269) who was created Baron in 1264 by Simon de Montfort." I trace Montforts to "Monforte" at Montferrat, but the two-tailed Montfort lion traces to the same lion in the Arms of Bohemia, beside Moravia that I figure named Moray. In fact, George, son of king Andrew, is said online to have married a woman from Podebrady in Bohemia, wherefore we should expect Bohemians at Moray.

Bohemians were earlier the Boii, and then, while it's known that MacBeth's line became the Beatons, we see a Bee variation of the Beaton/Beth surname. As I'm sure that the Boii of northern Italy formed the Maccabees/Maccabeaus' proper, note the MacBee variation too. It looks like the Beaton motto may have a "bon" buried in honor of Bononia, the city of the Boii. Moreover, the Maccabee-suspect Mackays (in Peter colors) were at the Moray theater, and in fact some say that MacHeth was, not only a MacBeth relation, but a Mackay. Wikipedia's article on MacHeth says, "See Mackays." Moray was also called, "Fortriu," and then the Mackays use a "forti" motto term. "Clan Mackay (Gaelic: Mac Aoidh) is an ancient and once-powerful Scottish clan from the far North of the Scottish Highlands, but with roots in the old kingdom of Moray. "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clan_Mackay

When emailing GD, I said: "Consider the Duttons (said to be descended from a niece of the Conqueror) as a line of Doda at Moray. Also, recall that Peter Pollock was at Moray...After writing that, I found that the Dowd/Doody/Duddy surname uses the Pollock saltire! EXCELLENT!" Furthermore, Duttons (look like a Tatton branch) use so-called "frets," a symbol of the Audleys (honored in the Pollock motto), while the Dowds/Doddy/Duddys use the sword design of Aude's.

The Tattons, who use the Dutton Shield, what looks to be a version of the Massey Shield (because Tattons are said to be from Dunham-Massey), are using the crescents of the Sprees and Speers, important, not just because Speers were first found in the same place as Pollocks, but because Massins/Masons, who honor Speers in their motto, use the mermaid found also in the Moray Crest.

As I traced the Pharisees to the naming of Ferrara (near Bononia), which was earlier Forum Allieni, it's interesting that the Forman/Forham surname was trace-able to "Forum Allieni," for Mackays, who are a Maccabee line expected from the Ferrara family of peoples, share a muzzled bear with the FORbes'/ForBEIS' (Aberdeen) who show a "guide" motto term that must be for the line of GUIDO Guerra. We could expect a Boy surname from the Boii, and so here's from the Forbes write-up: "...John de Fernboys..."

Back to the Mackay article (where we find them using the Macey Shield that itself uses a mace, an appropriate Maccabee symbol): "Also Gordon's genealogy claims that the chiefs of the Clan Mackay shared a common ancestor with both the chiefs of the Clan Forbes and chiefs of Clan Farquharson." I am quite certain that Farquharsons are a line of Fergus = Ferrari's as Ferrara's Pharisee lines led to the MacAlpin line at Moray. The Fergus Coat (shows the same lion as Ferrari's) may even be using the Beaton/Beth/Bee Shield. Fergus' and Dowds/Duddys were first found in the same place (Mayo).

Back to the Boston Marathon

I did not believe that an officer was shot in the shoot-out between the Russian brothers and the police in regards to the marathon last April. I figured at the time that he had faked a light wound to expressly create the image of a shoot-out in the news. I do not believe that a shoot-out took place. I do not believe the Russian brothers were armed or even trying to escape by car. I couldn't believe what I was reading as I read the article below, but, finally, I got down to the part where the officer claims he can't recall being shot, and suddenly that's evidence of monkey-business on the part of the insider fakers:

The police officer who survived a showdown with the Boston Marathon bombing suspects left the hospital [June 14] and headed home with a bullet still in his body, nearly two months after the gun battle that severed one of his major arteries.

...He's been coping with nerve damage that can make it painful to walk, and will continue to do outpatient rehab.

...ut Donohue said he still has a long way to go before he makes a full recovery....

...The officer said he has no memory of the April encounter on the streets of Watertown, Mass., between police and marathon bombing suspects Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

Authorities have said the suspects and officers exchanged gunfire and the brothers also lobbed explosives at police in their attempt to escape.

Donohue also said he hasn't heard anything new on the investigation into who may have fired the bullet that pierced his groin and almost killed him. He has said in the past that it didn't matter to him if the bullet turned out to be from an officer's gun, saying officers did their jobs in the chaotic encounter that also resulted in 26-year-old Tamerlan Tsarnaev's death.

How does one lose memory by being shot in the groin? Is it possible that the police intended to kill this officer, as I think they killed the MIT officer at his car on the same night? The officer may actually know some details on how he was shot (i.e. by police), and could be feigning the losing of his memory in order to feign that he doesn't recall the details; otherwise, he would be in danger of being murdered by the FBI to silence him. The last paragraph above makes it sound as though he gracefully wants the matter to disappear into his past.

Why was the bullet not removed from the groin? If the bullet was removed, it would be entered as part of the evidence in the coming court case of State versus Tsarnaev. Of course, since the Russian brothers didn't shoot it, this bullet would become a complication for the State's attorneys. Therefore, it's even possible that the bullet was removed but that the injured officer was convinced to lie about it in order to keep this bullet out of court. That is more believable to me than the report that the bullet is still in his body.

On this page, you will find evidence enough that NASA did not put men on the moon. Starting at this paragraph, there is a single piece of evidence -- the almost-invisible dot that no one on the outside was supposed to find -- that is enough in itself to prove the hoax. End-times false signs and wonders may have to do with staged productions like the lunar landing.