﻿﻿﻿On the topic of High Speed 2, I realised that the expected date for the High Speed 2 to finish its planning and construction, and be released to the general public, is within the year 2026 (phase 1 - (London Euston > Old Oak Common < Heathrow Hub > Birmingham Interchange >< Birmingham Curzon Street) and 2032-3 (phase 2 (towards Manchester (East Midlands Hub > Manchester Interchange > Manchester Piccadilly) and towards Leeds (East Midlands Hub > Meadowhall Interchange > Leeds New Lane)), and the cost of High Speed 2 is estimated to be above £80 million, according to the Institute of Economic Affairs. ﻿

If you realise what goes on within the authorities, then this will be of no surprise to you:

Then you should be aware that, even though it is possible for the High Speed 2 to be done quicker and with lower price, the authorities refuse to speed up progress and reduce cost on the High Speed 2 project.﻿

Here are some questions that might be asked here:﻿Why are you asking this? Wasn't the video clip talking only about the financial system in the USA? Don't the authorities have billions of pounds in their reserves as to boost the status of the High Speed 2 project? Are the authorities too poor?

As for the answers to these questions: The authorities, do not want to spend the money, because their plan was not to manage and improve public services, it is to siphon the wealth of the population, until the general public is left so poor, they become exceedingly dependant on the government to raise the standards of wealth again, yet, the highest political power in the world prevents the raising of standards from happening. And this huge scam is happening EVERYWHERE, NOT JUST THE UNITED STATES!

All the authorities just love to print worthless cheques and print millions of banknotes (currency), also by multiplying them.

Conclusion: The reason why High Speed 2 is not being funded is NOT because of a lack of money. It is actually because ofgreed. Even the authorities attempting to increase the price of a single mile of railway track does not attach a cost high enough for the cost of a railway track to be a reason for a lack of funding or progress.

It is time that the railway organisations become independent from the evil authorities and give higher quality satisfaction to the general public...but retain their same organisation name.﻿