Many Internet forums have carried discussion of the Electric Universe hypothesis. Much of that discussion has added more confusion than clarity, due to common misunderstandings of the electrical principles. Here we invite participants to discuss their experiences and to summarize questions that have yet to be answered.

I've spent quite a bit of time in the last few days reading the back and forth generated by a number of EU followers taking on what seems to be the impossible task of sharing and then defending their understandings of the EU in the comment threads and boards of a variety of mainstream science / astronomy practitioner's outlets.

It's difficult to watch these lay-folks try to give voice and defend their understandings of what they have gleaned from the EU. It seems to me that most of them have a lot of fire but little ammunition. In essence, I see the water carriers inspired to run onto the field without realizing how dangerous the game really is - and I see the other side having no problem hitting someone who isn't wearing pads. It's brutal and messy.

Does anyone know where I can go to read the EU principals (Talbott, Thornhill, Scott etc) going one on one (in a back and forth fashion) with mainstreamers? It would be helpful to see how they themselves have taken on the critics first hand and how they themselves have handled answering the criticisms?

Much of what is asked of the "water carriers" in these exchanges is to interpret, clarify and defend the claims of what the principals of the EU are communicating - all in the language and short-hand of science. Which you can imagine is usually a recipe for disaster.