Princeton
Area
68 South Main St.
Cranbury, NJ 08512
By Appointment Only
Toll Free 800-655-2977

Proof of Operation of a Motor Vehicle in a DWI Case

The State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant was driving while intoxicated. State v. Grant, 196 N.J. Super. 470, 477 (App. Div. 1984). N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 specifically applies to a person who operates a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . . (Emphasis added). The term operate must be given broad construction. State v. Morris, 262 N.J. Super. 413, 417 (App. Div. 1993). Actual operation is not required to satisfy the element. Ibid.; State v. Sweeney, 40 N.J. 359, 360-61 (1963). Operation may be proved by any direct or circumstantial evidence as long as it is competent and meets the requisite standards of proof. State v. George, 257 N.J. Super. 493, 497 (App. Div. 1992). Operation may be proved by actual observation of the defendant driving while intoxicated, State v. Prociuk, 145 N.J. Super. 570, 573 (Law Div. 1976); by observation of the defendant in or out of the vehicle under circumstances indicating that the defendant had been driving while intoxicated, State v. Mulcahy, 107 N.J. 467, 476 (1987); Morris, supra, 262 N.J. Super. at 419-20; Sweeney, supra, 77 N.J. Super. 512, 521 (App. Div. 1962); State v. Witter, 33 N.J. Super. 1, 5-7 (App. Div. 1954); or by defendant¹s admission, State v. Hanemann, 180 N.J. Super. 544, 547 (App. Div.) (affirming defendant¹s conviction based upon his admission that he had been driving earlier that night after the police found his empty overturned vehicle on the highway), certif. denied, 88 N.J. 506 (1981); State v. Dickens, 130 N.J. Super. 73, 78 (App. Div. 1974) (affirming defendant¹s conviction based on his admission to drinking and driving when the police woke him up in his parked car on Interstate 287); State v. Guerrido, 60 N.J. Super. 505, 509 (App. Div. 1960) (affirming defendant¹s conviction based on the testimony of two witnesses that he was intoxicated and his admission to police that he had been driving after his car was found buried full length in some shrubbery and lilac bushes.)

The Appellate Division in State v Ebert 377 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 2005) recently detailed the proof required by the state. 1. The state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant was operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. "Operation" may be proved by actual observation of the defendant driving while intoxicated, by observation of the defendant in or out of the vehicle under circumstances indicating that the defendant had been driving while intoxicated, or by the defendant's admission. 2. Defendant's .27 percent BAC, along with the fact that she had driven to the parking lot of a restaurant on a major state highway, Route 46 in Denville, was sufficient to sustain her conviction for reckless driving. Conclusion If charged with Driving While Intoxicated, immediately schedule an in-office appointment with a trial attorney. Don't rely on a real estate attorney, public defender or a family member who simply attended law school. When your driving privileges and ability to drive to work is on the line, hire an experienced attorney.

Meet with an experienced
Attorney to handle your important legal needs.
Please call the office to schedule a confidential "in Office"
consultation.
Attorneys are not permitted to provide legal advice by email.

Kenneth
Vercammens Law office represents individuals charged with criminal, drug
offenses, and serious traffic violations throughout New Jersey. Our office
helps people with traffic/ municipal court tickets including drivers charged
with Driving While Intoxicated, Refusal and Driving While Suspended.

Kenneth
Vercammen was the NJ State Bar Municipal Court Attorney of the Year and
past president of the Middlesex County Municipal Prosecutors Association.

Criminal
and Motor vehicle violations can cost you. You will have to pay fines
in court or receive points on your drivers license. An accumulation of
too many points, or certain moving violations may require you to pay expensive
surcharges to the N.J. DMV [Division of Motor Vehicles] or have your license
suspended. Dont give up! The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen can provide
experienced attorney representation for criminal motor vehicle violations.

When
your job or drivers license is in jeopardy or you are facing thousands
of dollars in fines, DMV surcharges and car insurance increases, you need
excellent legal representation. The least expensive attorney is not always
the answer. Schedule an appointment if you need experienced legal representation
in a traffic/municipal court matter.

Contact the Law Office
of
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
at 732-572-0500
for an appointment.

The
Law Office cannot provide legal advice or answer legal questions over
the phone or by email. Please call the Law office and schedule a
confidential "in office" consultation. The Law Office
now accepts payment by American Express, Visa and Master Card.

.

Disclaimer
This web site is purely a
public resource of general New Jersey information (intended, but not
promised or guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date). It is
not intended be a source of legal advice, do not rely on information
at this site or others in place of the advice of competent counsel.
The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen complies with the New Jersey Rules
of Professional Conduct. This web site is not sponsored or associated
with any particular linked entity unless specifically stated.
The existence of any particular link is simply intended to imply potential
interest to the reader, inclusion of a link should not be construed
as an endorsement.