The
232nd 4th of July celebrations are soon to be over for another year.
We might even smirk at our good fortune, but are we really free of
them? The research that I have done over the last 15 years continues
to show that we have been brought back under British rule. While I
thought the reunion began in 1944 with creation of the IMF/World Bank
and 1945 with the United Nations, I recently found the charade goes
back to 1794. While it appears that we are independent, we are not.
My first inkling that something was amiss began when I discovered
Prince Charles supported the population reducing environmental philosophy
of sustainable development. I found he was a major player behind the
scenes to get this diabolical agenda to “go down” at the
1992 Rio Earth Summit. He also organized a major meeting in Charleston
two years earlier in 1990 to bring together CEO’s from the world’s
most powerful companies to help lobby for Agenda 21 in Rio and then
for them to help change the structure of government through public-private
partnerships.

As
I researched the United Nations and started working on my first book,
Prince
Charles the Sustainable Prince, I realized that the British
were the power behind that organization. I have yet to change my mind.
If anything, the evidence starts to compound. In 2004, while covering
the World Trade Organization meeting in Cancun Mexico, I interviewed
three officials from different British Commonwealth countries. In
separate interviews I asked them the same questions and received the
same responses: They are poor and starving and even though they are
members of the Commonwealth, there is no help from Britain. When asked
why they don’t withdraw from the Commonwealth, each of them
looked at me with great fear and said, “We can’t.”
To which I replied, “Then you are not free.” I went home
upset because something was wrong.

As
I started to research the Commonwealth, I found the Treaty of Westminster
signed in 1931 put in place the Commonwealth structure as a way for
the monarch to create the illusion that her colonies had independence
when in fact it was a plan devised in the 1920s by the Royal Institute
for International Affairs, now called Chatham House. The 1926 Balfour
Declaration established Britain and its dominions were “equal
in status, in no way subordinate to one another in any aspect of their
domestic or external affairs, though united by common allegiance to
the Crown and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth
of Nations.” While colonies were given legislative independence,
it automatically set the basis for continuing the relationship through
the Commonwealth in which they share allegiance to the monarch! Therefore,
the Queen is not only Queen of Canada, but Queen of 12 other colonies
in our hemisphere which include: The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Jamaica,
and Trinidad and Tobago. Today at the international level, the U.S.
is outvoted by the Commonwealth at all global institutions: the United
Nations, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the G8, the
G7, the Free Trade Areas of the Americas, etc. To our one vote, the
Commonwealth has the potential of 54 votes.

Advertisement

If
that were not enough, I have long suspected that when all the countries
of the world signed on and became part of the international infrastructure:
the United Nations, the World Bank, etc. that they were also signing
on to some form of allegiance to the Crown. Providing me with a major
link is a book I recently came across a book, Dispute Settlement
in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by Natalie
Klein, published in 2005 by Cambridge University Press. To my shock,
Ms. Klein writes,

“The
Jay Treaty was a precedent for the settlement of the Alabama claims.”

I
recently became acquainted with the never discussed and somehow forgotten
Jay Treaty which every red-blooded American should know about. During
the Civil War, ships owned by the state of Alabama were damaged by
a British frigate. A Commission of Inquiry was set up so England could
settle the damage dispute with Alabama. Interestingly enough, the
procedure for the formation for International Commission of Inquiry
go back to the Jay Treaty of 1794. It appears that all U.S. foreign
policy comes out of the Jay Treaty and that all UN legal policy goes
back to it. From www.yale.edu,
we find,

The Jay
Treaty. Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and navigation, signed at London
November 19, 1794, with additional article Original in English.
Submitted to the Senate June 8, Resolution of advice and consent,
on condition, June 24, 1795. Ratified by the United States August
14, 1795. Ratified by Great Britain October 28, 1795. Ratifications
exchanged at London October 28, 1795. Proclaimed
[only kings proclaim] February 29, 1796.

Treaty
of Amity Commerce and Navigation, between His Britannick Majesty;
and the United States of America, by Their President, with the advice
and consent of Their Senate.
(Emphasis added)

Furthermore,
the Jay Treaty incorporates the concept of the Commission
of Inquiry which evolved out of the negotiating framework
that established the 1794 Jay Treaty negotiations. According to historian
Pitman B. Potter who wrote An Introduction to the Study of International
Organizations, published in 1922,

The commission
of inquiry originated in the ‘mixed commission,’ which
had been extensively used since 1794, when the institution was adopted
by Great Britain and the United States for conducting certain arbitrations
provided in the Jay Treaty.

He
further states on page 206, that a Commission of Inquiry is “[A]
body of persons acting as a unified international governmental institution.”
What?? That then means anytime we discuss or have a meeting on the
international level that a Commission of Inquiry is being set up.
He goes on to explain,

“A
great improvement has since been made by the United States in this
regard in concluding some thirty-five treaties with different nations
providing for commissions of inquiry to be appointed in advance of
the occurrence of any dispute between parties.” (Potter,
p.209)

Potter
goes on to explain that the 1794 Jay Treaty established the world’s
first recognized international government,

“The
year 1794 is frequently taken as a date from which the history of
modern international arbitration is to be traced. In a sense this
is accurate, for the Jay Treaty of that year, between Great Britain
and the United States, made provision for three arbitrations and thus
inaugurated that Anglo-American practice of arbitration which has
been the leading factor in promoting the development of arbitration
since that time.” (Page 225)

According
to Potter, as a result of the Hague Peace Conference of 1899, the
Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes was
signed in July 1899 at The Hague. From 1899 to 1921, “arbitration
assumed the proportions of an international fad with the United States
and Great Britain still leading the movement but with all of the world
joining in vogue (page 226).” This is the legal basis for the
Commission of Inquiry which President Wilson convened to settle World
War I.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Interestingly
enough the Versailles Peace Treaty which established the League of
Nations which came out of the Commission of Inquiry. Furthermore,
the Council on Foreign Relations-CFR came out of the Commission of
Inquiry, "The
vision that stirred the Inquiry became the work of the Council on
Foreign Relations over a better part of the century." It
should be noted that the CFR has the same objective as Chatham House—bringing
the world under British rule. What Ms. Klein was explaining in her
book is that the Commission of Inquiry is part of the Law of the Sea
Treaty! Is it as possible as it looks that the entire global infrastructure
comes from the Commission of Inquiry process and the Jay Treaty of
1796? In other words, we never broke with Britain as they created
other ways to keep us in the fold. Using multiple techniques, the
British created the international level of government they control.
Tea anyone?

Joan
Veon is a businesswoman and international reporter, who has covered over
100 Global meetings around the world since 1994. Please visit her website:
www.womensgroup.org. To get a
copy of her WTO report, send $10.00 to The Women's International Media
Group, Inc. P. O. Box 77, Middletown, MD 21769. For an information packet,
please call 301-371-0541

As I started to research
the Commonwealth, I found the Treaty of Westminster signed in 1931 put
in place the Commonwealth structure as a way for the monarch to create
the illusion that her colonies had independence when in fact it was a
plan devised in the 1920s by the Royal Institute for International Affairs,
now called Chatham House.