The politicians that are fighting voter ID are going to cheat the election period. They say voters will be disenfranchised if Identification is needed and the numbers of fraud cases are minimal. Why would they be willing to accept any fraud period? These politicians are DEMOCRATS and again are showing their total and complete corruption!The numbers of fraudulent voters is significant, in the millions, including dead dogs, dead people and illegals.

Voter fraud is the big issue that may decide the outcome of this election

In Seattle, Wash., last month, Brenda Charlston received a voter
registration form in the mail from the Voter Participation Center with
all the blanks filled in for “Rosie Charlston,” her black Labrador who
died in 1998.

The Obama supporting center says it has mailed some 5 million forms
using commercially available databases to target Democratic-leaning
groups such as unmarried women. What did they use in the Brenda/Rosie
mailing? The dead dog mailing list?

In June, in Buford County, Va., Tim Morris received a filled-out
voter registration form for “Mozart Morris” addressed to “Mo,” his dog
that passed away two years before. Again, the form came in the mail from
the Voter Participation Center.

In Bernalillo County, N.M., an anonymous Republican registered his
dog as a voter at a voter registration booth at the University of New
Mexico to show how easy it would be to defraud the system. Election
officials claim they followed the law and referred the case to state
prosecutors for criminal investigation of the dog owner!

Election officials throughout the country report a surge of voter registrations from animals, dead people and noncitizens.

Republicans believe Obama is depending on these registrations to win
the election and want laws requiring voter ID at the polls. Democrats
charge that Republicans are trying to suppress the vote to increase the
odds of a Romney win.

This Democrat charge formed the basis of a lawsuit by Obama’s
Department of Justice to block a Texas law that requires voter photo ID
to vote. Texas is one of 26 states with such laws.

The DOJ claimed the requirement would bar eligible voters from voting
and that the cost of getting the proper ID amounted to a “poll tax.”
The Texas law provides for a free state ID to anyone lacking a driver’s
license or other photo ID.

A study by a DOJ expert produced a long list of Texans who lacked
government-issued photo ID and, it was alleged, were thereby
disenfranchised. The list and the study were a fraud.

The list turned out to contain the names of 50,000 dead people,
330,377 seniors who can vote by mail without ID, 261,887 voters who
included a driver’s license number on their voter registration form,
800,000 Texans who were, in fact, registered to vote and who did have a
government issued photo ID.

The list also contained the names of Texans with U.S. military ID
(acceptable for photo ID to vote), former Texas residents who had moved
to other states, disabled voters who were exempt from the Texas photo ID
law and noncitizens.

Strangely, the list of those who “lacked government issued ID”
included former President George W. Bush, two state legislators and the
wife of another, former U.S. Sen. Phil Gramm, current U.S. Sen. Kay
Bailey Hutchison and even the Texas director of elections, Keith Ingram –
who was listed not once but twice!

However, even the Texas attorney general has yet to find the names of any dogs, living or dead, on the list.

Obama’s DOJ also went after Florida for passing a similar law. It
seems that Obama voters who were dead, felons or noncitizens would not
get to vote.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott ordered county election officials to examine
the integrity of the voting rolls. In the first review, the names of
83,000 dead people were discovered still registered to vote.

The dead deserve representation given the estate-tax debate, but the law does not yet allow them to vote.

DOJ also objected to Florida’s insistence that felons be barred from voting.

Noncitizens were also found on the voter rolls, and Gov. Scott fought
to get access to the federal Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements, or SAVE, database. SAVE will allow Florida to purge the
voter roll of noncitizens.

In a strange, parallel world, the Obama Agriculture Department
requires ID on every cow, and now on every chicken, on every American
farm.

Obama wants to trace the movement of farm animals but not illegal
aliens; he wants to ID every farm animal to protect the public health
but does not want to ID voters to protect the integrity of elections.

With the memory still fresh that the 2000 presidential election was
decided by a handful of voters in Florida, the determination of who gets
to vote in 2012 could decide who will be the next president.

Dont like your selections, but it is not voter fraud, but voter suppression that may change the outcome. I am hoping that most states will not allow this new legislation to pass. the republicans have had 4 years to check voter registration roles so why now? Because they know Romney will lose unless they can get rid of some democrat voters.

If your valued democrats without an ID don't want to take the little bit of time it takes to get valid photo ID (states with such requirement waive the fee for a state ID card) then I have very little empathy for them. Good grief - you have to have ID to drive, bank, travel and purchase - anyone without an ID is suspect or it is high time they got down to the business of getting one.

If that is true, then these people would have ID's. Evidently, they dont need ID's for any of the reasons you state. I applied for medicare and got my card and everything was done over the phone. No one had to check my ID for any of that stuff, so why is it needed for Voting. Last year, I went to the polls and had my registration card and I even asked them if they needed to see my drivers license also, and they said no, but this year, all of the sudden it is a necessary? This is voter suppression pure and simple. Oh, by the way, I am white, so maybe that is why a photo ID wasnt needed.

Nice but what you left out were the personal questions you were asked while signing up for medicare, everyone has ID including you, identification is mandatory to function in America period.You took your registration card and was not a problem like you said.

I could have been anyone on the line and they stole my information. I could have said I want the money sent to a P.O. box, not direct deposit. Yes, I had my registration, but I could have stolen that. The voter ID law should have been initiated right after the last election. Not now..

They found maybe 80 peope out of millions that actually committed fraud, and some of those honestly didnt know they couldnt vote. This is prepostorous. They invented a fix when there is no problem to win the election. Dont believe this garbage, you may be next. They even admitted it. http://www.dailykos.com/story...

Alex jones?? Please. I am not even going to read his nonsense. It has been proven by real live honest people that the voter fraud is so low, that it isnt a problem, and definitely is not the time it takes to change laws. It is all about suppression so that Obama will lose. It is not going to work.

Obama is going to lose anyway, and instead of letting the voting process fall to a level of 3rd world stature we should fix this now. You don't know who is going to lose any more than I do. The point is how to best serve American citizens and protect their voting rights.

You better rethink your options. Do you really think a businessman can run a country? Look at his record as Governor, and also realize a businessman isnt concerned with the welfare of all, but how to profit. They arent concerned with giving people jobs, but more concerned with hiring as few as possible, productivity of the workers, keeping pay low, paying as few benefits as they can. He would cut out programs that help the needy, maximize profits for the rich by cutting their taxes. he would in essence encourage businesses to go overseas. In Massachusetts, his track record was terrible. He said he wouldnt raise taxes so instead he raised fees on things like death certificates, etc. His unemployment was worse when he left than when he came into office. The only good thing he did was the hc and now he is running from that.

Are you kidding me? It is proven a community organizer sure as hell can't ,highest poverty rate ever, higher unemployment,failed foreign policies, out of control spending, private industry takeovers. I will go with the business man period, your assumptions of what Romney will cut is all yours. You want to talk about terrible records, just look at the failure in the White House.The only good thing Obama has done is wake Americans up to socialism, and I give him credit for creating the TPM.

And why is that? Because of the Bush years, banks being deregulated so much that they gambled you money away and we almost went under. When Obama came in and the stimulus was passed, he stopped the bleeding and we are now in recovery. Yes, it is slow because it was a whole lot worse than we thought. 4 months after Obama took office, almost 4 million jobs were lost because of the BUSH administration and now Romney wants to go back to the same policies. And the way he is talking about Iran, we will probably be in another war.

The Bush years? The democrats took control in Jan 2007, Bushes last two years are the result of Democrat control period.The very 1st bill they passed limited oil drilling and exploration they were so proud of them selves. Bush tried 17 times to stop the Housing bubble crisis created by Clinton and the democrats, they called it the fair housing act . The stimulus was a complete lie and failure, there were no shovel ready jobs except the one shovel Obama uses to move his lies. The money did not go to new jobs, every time Obama was pressured about jobs it was magically his priority and he has to date not done anything to improve the situation. All you have it pathetic democrat talking points that are meaningless, you have no idea what Romney will do to fix this economy, but rest assured it will be better for all Americans. Romney is successful and did it on his own, just like small business owner across America, you know the people that create jobs. Your just another excuse making Obama supporter.

Obama came in and stopped the bleeding of jobs. You and I got tax breaks as did all the middle class. Alot of governors took that stimulus money and instead of creating jobs, they used the money to balance their budgets. The biggest problem with the stimulus according to economists was that it wasnt big enough. You are right. we have no idea what Romney could do to our country, but based on his history as governor in Massachusetts it wont be good. He has no plan and he has said as much. He just criticizes the Obama and says very little about his vision.

Total nonsense, Romney has put his plans out there and they are sound fiscal policies Based on Obama and his performance we know it could end the American dream. BTW 16 states with republican governors are doing much better than the country as a whole not because of the stimulus but because of sound fiscal policy. Like I said the stimulus failed and all it did was raise taxes. Obama and his divisive policies to pit rich against poor, black against white,American against American using any way he can to divide this country is the most pathetic non leadership ever. . Obama and his constant lying and taxing is unacceptable period. Obama has done the largest tax increase in history and now wants more. I am sick of him and his divisive policies period. Obama must go. OMG! :)

Nothing you said is true. We are paying the lowest taxes in 30 years. The Ryans plan will add trillions to the deficit. There is nothing sound about deregulating corporations or banks. http://www.realclearpolitics....Obama has never put black against white. Republicans have done it over and over by saying Obama wasnt born here, he is unamerican, he is a socialist, etc. Obama believes that the rich should pay more, which makes sense, since they own 47% of the wealth. The stimulus did not fail, it kept us from an all out depression.

Obama is a racist period. His " some people may not like me because of the way I look " comment was racist, his comment " the police acted stupidly" before he had any information in the Gates situation, his association with Rev Wright says it all,except the Mischell comment " I have never been proud of America until now " is pure racism. So yes he has put black against white, His handling of his campaign attacks against business is putting Americans against Americans using envy. The man is a divider and is deliberate in his actions!Obama will lose this election in a landslide period! LOL!

He was right. Some people dont like him because of the way he looks. The police did act stupidly. The man had a key to the house and the cop kept questioning him. Michelle is Michelle, and Obama is not accountable for what she said, and she didnt mean it in the most derogatory way. Have you always been proud of our country? I sure havent, but I will always love this country. Now, be quiet. Obama will win the next election. Obama 2012!!!!

The Republicans have realized for many years that in a full and fair election they have no chance of winning. As a result, in election after election we have seen massive efforts to disenfranchise as many American citizens as possible, and these efforts are always targeted at those demographic groups most likely to vote for Democrats, like blacks, hispanics, senior citizens, the disabled, the poor, and college students. The latest round of "Voter ID" laws have absolutely nothing to do with preventing voter fraud, since there basically is no polling place voter fraud anywhere in the United States. In the past twelve years there have been over a billion total votes cast, and a total of less than 200 cases of voter fraud. There is more chance of someone getting struck by a bolt of lightning then there is of a fraudulent vote being cast. And there is not a single documented case in at least half a century of a dead person or a non-human being casting a vote. The Right Wing is very good at coming up with phony anecdotes, but the reality is that these nonsensical accusations simply DO NOT EXIST.

At the same time, conservative (pardon the expression) estimates indicate that if all of these ALEC inspired voter suppression laws were to go into effect as many as 5 MILLION America...

The Republicans have realized for many years that in a full and fair election they have no chance of winning. As a result, in election after election we have seen massive efforts to disenfranchise as many American citizens as possible, and these efforts are always targeted at those demographic groups most likely to vote for Democrats, like blacks, hispanics, senior citizens, the disabled, the poor, and college students. The latest round of "Voter ID" laws have absolutely nothing to do with preventing voter fraud, since there basically is no polling place voter fraud anywhere in the United States. In the past twelve years there have been over a billion total votes cast, and a total of less than 200 cases of voter fraud. There is more chance of someone getting struck by a bolt of lightning then there is of a fraudulent vote being cast. And there is not a single documented case in at least half a century of a dead person or a non-human being casting a vote. The Right Wing is very good at coming up with phony anecdotes, but the reality is that these nonsensical accusations simply DO NOT EXIST.

At the same time, conservative (pardon the expression) estimates indicate that if all of these ALEC inspired voter suppression laws were to go into effect as many as 5 MILLION American citizens would lose their right to vote. We have already seen this in action as veterans, senior citizens, even former members of Congress have been disenfranchised in primaries because they didn't have "the right kind of ID". In the state of Texas, a gun license is acceptable identification, but a student ID, even if issued by a State run University is not. There is neither logic nor rationality to any of these laws, designed to address a problem that does not exist.

As usual a long winded line of nonsense, Your comments are simply wrong from the start. Your infantile belief that there is only a little is a pathetic excuses to accept fraud period! Laughable position for someone who is supposedly licensed to represent law. Ha what a joke. As an attorney, why would you not want to fix a broken system, let me guess is it because your a progressive liberal that has a failed political philosophy.

The system isn't broken. When you have a fraud rate of 0.000003% you don't need legislation that will not prevent most voter fraud anyway (since more voter fraud occurs with mail in ballots than in person voting) but will disenfranchise millions of legal voters.

The truth is that the Republicans have known for decades that they can't win a fair election. The last fair election they won was in 1988 (and that was only because Dukakis was too much of an idiot for even Democrats to vote for), and the only way they can hold on is by disenfranchisement.

The most disenfranchised Americans are our military serving foreign duty. Many times their voter envelopes are not sent in time to get back in time to be counted and nothing is done about that. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepa... Why is it we never hear any outcry from you libs about the very men and women who grant us the right to vote having their votes count for nothing?

I just can't get my head around a group of people who think that requiring everybody to purchase insurance isn't oppressive, but asking for proof of citizenship before voting as a citizen is.

The answer is simple - but, implementing it would mean politicians actually want to solve the problem, not use it as a political weapon. It used to be that registered legal voters received a voter registration card. That, with any form of photo ID, was all one needed to vote. Why can't that be the common policy? Or would you libs still yell "DISENFRANCHISEMENT"?

It seems to me the problem isn't dead people who are REGISTERED, it's dead people who show up and vote.

I have no problem with showing valid I.D., signing my name, whatever, to vote. I can see that having to register every 2-4 years could be a problem for local officials, but maybe that's the way to go. Whatever it takes to keep our elections legit is fine with me.

I'm a citizen of the U.S., and I can vote. Illegals, dead people, etc. aren't citizens and can't vote. So far my dog hasn't gotten any invitations to register. She hasn't gotten any catalogues either.

Let us not forget another side of the voter/ voting fraud committed by the Obama administration; The Electronic Voting Machines. A bunch of those machine are manufactured in France by a company owned by none other than Obama's puppet master George Soros.

GEORGE SOROS WILL CONTROL YOUR VOTES IN THE UP COMING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
10 April 2012, by The Meister (It Makes Sense Blog)
http://itmakessenseblog.com/2...

Unless someone can stop this ruse – george soros controls us completely

Follow the bouncing ball on the criminal corruption ruse of your USA votes.

1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?

2.) Obama outsorced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.

3.) But recently, SOE software has now been sold to a company named SCYTL, owned by George Soros, headquartered in Spain.

4.) The votes will go to SCYTL, the question becomes as to WHY Must local votes for each precinct will be downloaded to SCYTL...

Let us not forget another side of the voter/ voting fraud committed by the Obama administration; The Electronic Voting Machines. A bunch of those machine are manufactured in France by a company owned by none other than Obama's puppet master George Soros.

GEORGE SOROS WILL CONTROL YOUR VOTES IN THE UP COMING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
10 April 2012, by The Meister (It Makes Sense Blog)
http://itmakessenseblog.com/2...

Unless someone can stop this ruse – george soros controls us completely

Follow the bouncing ball on the criminal corruption ruse of your USA votes.

1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?

2.) Obama outsorced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.

3.) But recently, SOE software has now been sold to a company named SCYTL, owned by George Soros, headquartered in Spain.

4.) The votes will go to SCYTL, the question becomes as to WHY Must local votes for each precinct will be downloaded to SCYTL’s main server – leaving no TRACEABLE record of how many, and what votes were scored! Which of course means that said votes will be MERGED; and any discrepancies at lower levels will be IMPOSSIBLE to track. 5.) But wait, it gets murkier: SCYTL is shadow owned by Pere Valles, a former CEO of Global Net; who just HAPPENS to have been a maximum level contributor to the Obama Campaign in 2008. Not surprisingly, Valles is also has contacts with Media Matters, a communication consortium owned by: George Soros.

7.) If this is allowed to stand, it means that as local election results funnel through SOE’s computers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the main servers for SOE essentially get “first look” at results, AND the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

8.) This raises an unending amount of troubling questions:

a.) How can a company that is located in Spain owned by George Soros, be responsible for verifying the results of American elections? How can the integrity of the vote be guaranteed, when votes are transmitted in digital form, with NO paperwork backup to check for discrepancies?

b.) It has been questioned since the inception of the voting machine how to preclude tampering with said machines; yet no answers are forthcoming. How easily can the software that controls these devices be programmed to “count” erroneously?

c.) Even worse, with SCYTL in charge, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of resonsibility. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, nor chain of custody, or the count.

d.)Ergo, does this not invite dishonest practices? - such as beginning the voting day with counts that were not reset to zero? Or the practice of switching, within the software, votes from one candidate to another?

e.)Will Harry Reid’s re-election in Nevada serve as a template for Barack Obama in 2012?

f.) Worst of all, why would we want to outsource a job, that goes to the very core of our constitutional process, to an outside organization? Because that’s how the democrats want it – having no other possible means to win.

g.) Which of course explains why Dems fight voter ID laws - because that would be mark the beginning of the end of voter fraud. The other end being some kind of auditing of all electronic voting machines.

Face it fellow citizens: the Motor Voter Law, and the electronic voting machine are turning America into a banana republic; while we act like helpless little bunnies; as the Left literally continues to steal elections – right beneath our quivering little noses.

So do we sit by idly? – or take action. Pick up the phone. Write a letter. Send a fax to your local Congressperson or Senator. (NOTE: do not send e-mails; they are not considered legitimate, because of spammers).

In your communication, demand action, by raising questions:

Did the FEC (Federal Elections Commission) approve of this SCYTL intrusion?

Does the Congress of the United States approve of this; or do they even know about it?

Was this done by an Executive Order from the White House?

Is this the final step in Obama’s rigging of the 2012 election, and the formation of a global government? Why is the AP not covering this ? Why is Fox news not covering this ? What we have now have is a Socialist CEO - running the nation’s voting and election counts.

Talk about a UN / Marxist / Communist dream come true!

And does this NOT explain why President Obama is so sure of being reelected? - as he speaks of his reelection as if it were in the present. This includes his conversation with the President of Russia, which was recorded on a hot microphone. Who in Washington authorized a global software company - owned by a Spanish Socialist - to be put in charge of counting our votes? Why is a company based in Spain (who counts votes in Athens, Greece) now teaming up with the Commonwealth of Virginia to count the overseas ballots of our military members? Who in the Dept. of Defense and the FEC (and the Congress) approved this? Or of course, we could do nothing, and watch our republic be literally be pulled out beneath us; just because we were not paying attention – counting on our corrupt, Obama-driven mainstream media to keep us apprised.

As Thomas Jefferson often warned: (quote)…”The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.”

Be forewarned America: This election is the last PEACEFUL opportunity we’ll have to change the future.

None of that is true, you know. If you really want to see electronic voting fraud, check out the results in Ohio in 2004 where Diebold stole the election after its' CEO "guaranteed" Bush's victory. It helps when Bush gets 9000 votes in a precinct that only had 800 total registered voters, I guess.

But please, keep blaming George Soros for everything under the sun. That way no one will ever mistake the Right Wing for rational human beings.

If you are at all interested in the integrity of the voting process, then why does the Right Wing oppose legislation that would REQUIRE every electronic vote cast to produce a paper receipt, so that each voter can verify that they vote they cast was properly recorded?