We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

As purveyors of beverages containing alcohol, most craft brewers, distillers and wineries are aware of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax And Trade Bureau (“TTB”) rules for labels, and the sometimes onerous task involved in getting those labels approved. To avoid extra expenses and delays, those who are not aware of the TTB requirements need to quickly get up to speed on those rules or engage counsel who can guide you through the process. We cannot overstate the importance of following TTB rules, and making sure every label change conforms with the rules, including new approvals where necessary. The TTB takes the rules very seriously. So seriously that it annually conducts a random compliance investigation and publicly publishes the results of that investigation.

But a couple of recent cases in the food industry show that the TTB is not the only one watching labels. Gerber Products Co. and Dr. Pepper have each recently been the targets of lawsuits related to labels that consumers claim are misleading. Now, you might ask what baby food and soft drinks have to do with craft beverages. Ordinarily the answer would be very little or nothing. But in this instance, a label is a label, and if it is misleading you could be open to litigation by a disgruntled consumer. In the case involving Gerber foods, the court found that the label was “technically correct.” Despite that finding, the court found the label misleading because of the existence of impermissible nutrient claims on Gerber’s labels. Those impermissible claims, together with the absence of those claims on its competitors’ products, could cause consumers to believe Gerber’s products were better, thereby making the label potentially misleading. Doctor Pepper finds itself in hot water with consumers based upon its Canada Dry Ginger Ale label saying that it contains “real ginger.” Consumers have sued Dr. Pepper in federal court claiming that the “real ginger” claim is misleading because the ingredients list includes chemical flavoring, but not “real ginger root.” While the Dr. Pepper case is in its early stages and Dr. Pepper may well prevail, it will likely be very expensive to defend the case. Making sure the representation on the front of the can and the list of ingredients match would have been far less expensive than defending a lawsuit.

In short, while it is imperative that you follow the TTB requirements for labels, it is equally important that you make sure the label is not misleading in any way. While certain claims may set you apart from the competition, the cost of defending a lawsuit if the claims are potentially misleading are not worth the extra barrels of beer the claim might enable you to sell.

Compare jurisdictions: BYOD: Bring Your Own Device

In common with many in-house lawyers, I have limited access to (and a limited budget for) resources and rely on receiving know-how from friends and contacts in private practice. Lexology is great as it provides a daily email with the headlines in all the areas of law that I am interested in (which are all relevant to me, as I was able to choose which areas I was interested in at registration), with links to articles from a wide variety of sources.

I tend to scroll through the daily email when I am having my lunch, reading the headlines and descriptions of the articles, and click on any items that are of interest to me - that way, I feel like I am kept 'in the loop' with legal developments.

In addition to the daily email, I find the articles themselves very helpful - they set out the legal principle but most importantly, they 'boil it down' to the practical implications. When I am doing legal research, I also find the archive search function very helpful.

I have recommended the service to quite a few friends who have also found it very helpful."