nmm 22 4500ICPSR31881MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31881MiAaIMiAaI
Explaining Low Fertility in Italy (ELFI)
[electronic resource]
David Kertzer
2012-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR31881NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The ethnographic fieldwork portion of the project - interviews with women of reproductive age, and when available their partners and mothers - was initiated and completed in 2006. For each of four Italian cities (Padua, Bologna, Cagliari, and Naples) studied ethnographically by trained anthropologists, both a working-class and a middle-class neighborhood were identified. These interviews (349 in number) have been transcribed without identifiers. All interviews have been coded and assigned 'attributes' (or nominative variables, such as gender, civil/religious status of marriage, etc.) using the qualitative data analysis software (NVIVO), and these reside in secure electronic project folders. This large body of qualitative interview data is now complete and ready for use across the international collaborative units. Preliminary research reveals the particular significance of family ties in Italy, the fundamental role played by gender systems, and the specific cultural, socio-economic, and politic contexts in which fertility behavior and parenting are embedded. Please see the study website for more information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31881.v1
reproductive historyicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrspousesicpsrtoddlersicpsrunwanted pregnanciesicpsrvital statisticsicpsrabortionicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrbirth expectationsicpsrbirth ratesicpsrcareersicpsrchild rearingicpsrchildlessnessicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdemographic fluctuationsicpsrdemographic statisticsicpsrdemographyicpsreconomicsicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrinfantsicpsrlabor (birth)icpsrmarriage ratesicpsrmothersicpsrparentsicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation decreaseicpsrpopulation dynamicsicpsrpopulation growth rateicpsrpopulation planningicpsrpopulation policyicpsrpopulation projectionsicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrpopulation trendsicpsrprenatal careicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VII. Population Growth and DeclineKertzer, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31881Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31881.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25362MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25362MiAaIMiAaI
Historical County Estimate Files
[electronic resource]Population Estimates of the United States, States and Counties, 1980-1989
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2011-06-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR25362NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The intercensal formula for the 1980s is described in Current
Population Reports, Series P25-1106. The formula was applied to both
state and county estimates. The intercensal estimates are based on
census counts which include the latest corrections available at the
time of production. The methodology for the 1980s postcensal estimates
estimates is described in P26-88A, and in several technical papers
emanating from the Population Estimates Branch.
Additional information can be found on the U. S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Website.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25362.v1
census dataicpsrcountiesicpsrFIPSicpsrhistorical dataicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25362Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25362.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34273MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34273MiAaIMiAaI
State Tax Revolt Data Set, 1960-1992
[electronic resource]
Margaret Weir
,
Isaac William Martin
2012-10-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34273NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The State Tax Revolt Data Set is a time-series, cross sectional data collection assembled from publicly available sources. It includes data on tax and expenditure limitation policies and selected covariates, observed annually for the 50 United States over the period of 1960-1992. Data were collected for variables both during the fiscal year and at the end of the fiscal year. Data collected at the end of the fiscal year include: (1) long-term and short-term debt of state and local governments, and (2) the total cash held by the state and its local governments. Data collected during the fiscal year include: (1) the total intergovernmental revenue from the federal government to the state and its local governments, (2) the total direct general revenue of the state and its local governments, (3) the total tax revenue of the state and its local governments, (4) total property tax revenue of the state and its local governments, (5) the total direct general expenditure of the state and its local governments, (6) the total direct general expenditure of the state and its local governments on "public welfare", (7) the total number of homeowners' associations in the state.
Additional data were collected on: (1) the percentage of randomly sampled adults who said that the local property tax was "the worst tax--that is, the least fair", (2) the percentage of households in the state that were owner-occupied, the percentage of the state's population that the Census classified as "urban", (3) the estimated total personal income in the state, (4) the population of the state, (5) the estimated percentage of the state's population that was not White, (6) the estimated percentage of the state's population that was Black, (7) the total state and local spending on education during the fiscal year and, (8) the estimated number of union members as a percentage of the state's labor force.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34273.v1
constitutional amendmentsicpsrconsumer price indexicpsreducation expendituresicpsrgovernment employeesicpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrhome ownersicpsrlocal governmenticpsrpersonal incomeicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrproperty taxesicpsrstate governmenticpsrstate legislatorsicpsrtax policyicpsrtax ratesicpsrtax recordsicpsrtax revenuesicpsrtaxesicpsrunion membershipicpsrICPSR I.A. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United StatesWeir, MargaretMartin, Isaac WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34273Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34273.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35206MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35206MiAaIMiAaI
United States Agriculture Data, 1840 - 2010
[electronic resource]
Michael Haines
,
Price Fishback
,
Paul Rhode
2014-12-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35206NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes county-level data from the United States Censuses of Agriculture for the years 1840 to 2010. The files provide data about the number, types, output, and prices of various agricultural products, as well as information on the amount, expenses, sales, values, and production of machinery. Most of the basic crop output data apply to the previous harvest year. Data collected also included the population and value of livestock, the number of animals slaughtered, and the size, type, and value of farms. Part 46 of this collection contains data from 1980 through 2010. Variables in part 46 include information such as the average value of farmland, number and value of buildings per acre, food services, resident population, composition of households, and unemployment rates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35206.v1
agricultural censusicpsragricultural landicpsragricultureicpsrcensusicpsrcensus dataicpsrcountiesicpsrcrop incomeicpsrcrop productionicpsrcrop valueicpsrcropsicpsrfarm familiesicpsrfarmsicpsrhistorical dataicpsrlivestockicpsrlivestock inventoriesicpsrlivestock valueicpsrmortgagesicpsrnineteenth centuryicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrtwentieth centuryicpsrtwenty-first centuryicpsrICPSR I.A.4. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Other Census, Including County and City Data BooksICPSR I.A. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United StatesHaines, MichaelFishback, PriceRhode, PaulInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35206Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35206.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31582MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31582MiAaIMiAaI
West Malaysian Family Survey, 1966-1967
[electronic resource]
Charles Hirschman
,
James Palmore
2012-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR31582NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Family Survey was a national (contemporary Peninsular Malaysia) probability sample survey consisting of an initial household screening interview followed by an intensive interview of all currently married women, aged 15 to 45, living in the screened households. The primary objective of the survey was to gather baseline data on fertility and on family planning knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The survey was conducted by the Malaysian Department of Statistics for the National Family Planning Board of Malaysia. Technical assistance was provided by the staff of the Population Studies Center of the University of Michigan.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31582.v1
family sizeicpsrfamily structureicpsrfertilityicpsrfertility ratesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrinfantsicpsrlive birthsicpsrmiscarriagesicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrbirth expectationsicpsrbirth ratesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdemographic fluctuationsicpsrdemographyicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrparenting skillsicpsrparentsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation decreaseicpsrpopulation densityicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrpopulation growthicpsrpopulation growth rateicpsrpopulation planningicpsrpopulation policyicpsrpopulation projectionsicpsrpopulation sizeicpsrpregnancyicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsingle mothersicpsrsingle parent familiesicpsrsingle parentsicpsrvital statisticsicpsrDSDR VII. Population Growth and DeclineDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthHirschman, CharlesPalmore, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31582Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31582.v1