Comments on: Mark Antony’s Persian Campaignhttp://www.historynet.com/mark-antonys-persian-campaign.htm
Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:22:00 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.2By: Rory Paulhttp://www.historynet.com/mark-antonys-persian-campaign.htm#comment-2600720
Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:26:48 +0000#comment-2600720I agree. There is also the problem that the author refers to the Parthians as the Persians on multiple occasions. Still, at least the author makes a good case for how mediocre (and quite possibly incompetent) Antony was as a general.
]]>By: Alexander Shahhttp://www.historynet.com/mark-antonys-persian-campaign.htm#comment-981951
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:28:01 +0000#comment-981951This article is poorly written, contains No cited information, but is apparently a jejune account of the complex story of Antony derived from verbatim (and uncritical) source reading of Plutarch or some such amateur \historian\ of antiquity.

And a huge error in conception is stated:

\After a march of 1,000 miles from Rome to Armenia, he did not allow his Roman soldiers time to rest and refit, but marched at once into Parthian territory.\

BS! – Antony marched from Syria and not from Rome. It was not Julius Caesar or his nephew who were leading troops east – but \the first Byzantine\, Mark Antony.