The expression “sleight of hand” has been taken from the
editorial in today’s Dyelo Naroda. This newspaper of
the “Socialist-Revolutionaries”, to which Kerensky and Chernov
are contributors, exposes the tricks of the French
spokesmen of “tamed socialism”, saying:

“These are old tricks, a very old sleight of hand. which in
our country
have been repeatedly and unsuccessfully practised by
Mr. Plekhanov without deceiving anybody....”

Are you not going to the elections in a bloc with this
very Plekhanov’s Yedinstvo? Are you not helping it
to get in, are you not saving it?

It was in your paper (No. 44 for May 9) that S. Mstislavsky
wrote of Plekhanov:

“When a recent leader of Russian Social-Democracy lends his band
to such counter-revolutionary attacks [as those of Russkaya
Volya and Novoye Vremya], then it is with,
profound regret and sincere sorrow that we are compelled to
recognise this fact, since we never really imagined that the
degeneration of the International had gone so far.”

We would add: and the degeneration of the
Socialist-Revolutionaries who have joined forces with this
very “Yedinstvo”.

And in an unsigned, i.e., editorial, note in Dyelo
Naroda No. 48, for May 13, we read:

“‘Yedimistvo’s’ political unity with the liberal
bourgeoisie is common knowledge.”

Mark that carefully! The “Socialist-Revolutionaries” and the
Mensheviks are in unity with that very Yedinstvo
whose
political unity with the liberal bourgeoisie is common
knowledge. Do not forget this, comrades, men and women
workers, and soldiers!

The Menshevik Rabochaya Gazeta for April 20 (No. 35)
wrote in an editorial:

“We are against the British imperialists. Yendinistvo
is against the British socialists. Herein lies the whole
difference. Herein lies the reason why Yedinstvo has to
argue à la Hottentot.... The Russian workers remember only too
well how Plekhanov, during the tsarist regime [there is a
misprint in the text: it should read “during the tsarist
republican regime”], tried in all manner of ways to dissuade
them from going on strike. Then, too, Plekhanov tried to scare
us with things even more terrible; ho tried to assure us that
such conflicts only played into the hands of the German General
Staff.”

And in the issue of the same paper for May 16 (No. 57) the
discreetly moderate ministerialist Cherovanin wrote:

“Plekhanov and his Yedinstvo are doing everything they
possibly can here to compromise the principle of defencism,
which has been compromised enough on an international scale
thanks to the efforts of the majority of the German, French and
other socialists.”

This is how Yedinstvo is estimated by the Narodniks and
the Mensheviks, this is how they try to dissociate
themselves from it, this is how ashamed they are of
it!

Nevertheless they have entered into a bloc with it at the
elections, and Plekhanov accepts seats from people who publicly
call him names, such as “juggler”, “tamed socialist”,
“Hottentot”, “compromised”, “in unity with the liberal
bourgeoisie”.