Search This Blog

After Decades Of Work, Scientists Found Direct Evidence Of Ice On The Moon

The idea
that there was ice on the Moon tantalized astronomers for years, even before
NASA’s Apollo mission to send astronauts to the lunar surface began. When the
NASA spacecraft Clementine brought sent back data that hinted at the possibility
that there was ice on the surface of the Moon in 1994, it stirred excitement
once again. The trouble was, the measurements recorded weren’t definitive.

Since then,
scientists have been plugging along for proof of lunar surface ice. Today (Aug.
20), a team of scientists led by researchers at the University of Hawaii found
the first direct evidence of frozen water on the Moon’s poles (paywall). The
discovery is based on data gathered by the Moon Mineralogy Mapper, a NASA
instrument that flew to the Moon back in 2008. Reanalyzing these data today,
the researchers found tiny patches of ice mixed with rock on the surface of
certain craters at the northernmost and southernmost points on the Moon.
Previous work had hinted that there could be various combinations of hydrogen
and oxygen—the elemental components of water—on the Moon, but this is the first
to identify actual frozen water molecules on the surface.

“This is
very exciting news, and provides significant impetus for future international
landings in the Polar Regions to drill and return samples of this ice,” says
Jim Head, a geologist studying planetary formation at Brown University, who was
not involved in the study. ”If ice is at the surface, this means that much more
could be buried at depth and covered and preserved below insulating soil, or
diffused into and frozen in the soil layers.”

The Moon
Mineralogy Mapper ( MMM ) gathered data on how various parts of the Moon’s
surface reflected beams of near-infrared light. Because different molecules
send back different reflections, scientists can accurately determine what sorts
of chemicals are found on any given surface that has been assessed in this
way.The team also used data from other
exploratory missions to the Moon, like the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ( LRO ),
which was a separate NASA mission launched in 2009, to confirm their findings.
The LRO identified compounds based on the ways they reflected ultraviolet light

Combining
these separate measurements of specific patterns of reflection with different types
of light allowed the team to identify ice’s chemical signature mixed in with
the dusty, rocky surface of the Moon in its dark, polar craters. AWESOME!

Shuai Li, a
geologist at the University of Hawaii who worked on the study, says the data
can’t tell us where the ice originally came from. However, Li adds, it’s likely
that it came from comets that smashed into the Moon years ago. Collisions with
other space objects, like meteorites and comets, gave the Moon its pockmarked
surface, and could have easily brought a foreign substance like ice along with
them. Ice on the lunar surface could also be a result of gases coming out of
the rock below. It could also be due to solar winds—energetically charged ions
emanating from the sun—bombarding the Moon’s surface to cause the chemical
reactions needed to make frozen water. However, to truly understand the ice’s
origins, Li hopes to get a rover onto the Moon to take actual samples of the
frigid lunar ground and its ice.

On Earth,
the presence of water gave rise to life. On other planets, it hints at the
prospect of finding new life, or the ability for us to survive somewhere other
than our own planet. Evidence of water on the surface of the Moon, Head says,
could be useful if we ever decided to try to build lunar bases, or explore
space even further.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Scientists
said on Thursday they recorded particles travelling faster than light - a
finding that could overturn one of Einstein's fundamental laws of the universe.
Antonio Ereditato, spokesman for the international group of researchers, saidthat measurements taken over three years showed neutrinos pumped from CERN near
Geneva to Gran Sasso in Italy had arrived 60 nanoseconds quicker than light
would have done.

“We
have high confidence in our results. We have checked and rechecked for anything
that could have distorted our measurements but we found nothing," he said.
"We now want colleagues to check them independently.” If
confirmed, the discovery would undermine Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of
special relativity, which says that the speed of light is a "cosmic
constant" and that nothing in the universe can travel faster. That
assertion, which has withstood over a century of testing, is one of the key
elements of the so-called Standard Model of physics, whic…

NASA’s Kepler Space
Telescope discovered an Earth-like planet circling a nearby star within the
Goldilocks zone of our galaxy. Kepler-186f is around 500 light-years from Earth
in the Cygnus constellation. The habitable zone, also identified as the
Goldilocks zone, is the area around a star within which planetary-mass objects
with enough atmospheric pressure can sustain liquid water at their surfaces.

While it has been
projected that there are at least 40 billion Earth-sized planets circling in
our Milky Way Galaxy, this specific finding is labelled the first Earth-sized
planet to be discovered in the habitable zone of another star. What does this mean?In addition to
Kepler-186f, there are 4 other planets that circle a nearby star within the
Kepler-186f system. What this means is that if the neighbouring star to this
planet is just like our Sun, then the likelihood of life on this planet
exponentially increases.

“We know of only one
planet where life survives – Earth. When we hunt for lif…

The reason why certain countries looks bigger or smaller than others is because of something called the Mercator Projection. Putting a 3D planet on a two-dimensional map was something of a challenge for early cartographers and so a Flemish geographer and cartographer named Gerardus Mercator came up with a solution. In 1569 he designed a map that could be accurately used for navigation purposes, but the downside was that his system distorted the size of objects depending on their position relative to the equator. Because of this, landmasses like Antarctica and Greenland appeared much larger than they actually are.

To show how incorrect our understanding of country sizes is, a website called thetruesize.com lets you move landmasses into different locations. Bored Panda has played a bit on this site, and this is what we found. #1 US Moved Down Next To Australia Looks Unbelievably Small

#2 Russia On The Equator Is Not A Giant Bear Anymore #3 If Romania Was An Island In The Arctic Ocean #4 Aust…