The "Middle East and Terrorism" Blog was created in order to supply information about the implication of Arab countries and Iran in terrorism all over the world. Most of the articles in the blog are the result of objective scientific research or articles written by senior journalists.

From the Ethics of the Fathers: "He [Rabbi Tarfon] used to say, it is not incumbent upon you to complete the task, but you are not exempt from undertaking it."

?php
>

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Both Before And After Lebanese Bank Bombing, Hizbullah Supporters Threatened Further Escalation That Would Impact Country's Future - E. B. Picali

by E. B. Picali

Hizbullah accused BLOM Bank of being so eager to implement the U.S.
sanctions that it exceeded the U.S. requirements.

Introduction

On June 12, 2016, shortly after 20:00, while
Beirut residents were breaking their Ramadan fast, an eight-kilogram bomb went
off outside the headquarters of BLOM Bank,[1]
one of Lebanon's leading banks, wounding two people and damaging the building.
In light of the intensive conflict in the last month between Hizbullah and
Lebanon's banking sector – chiefly Lebanon's central bank and several other
banks, including BLOM Bank – over the implementation of U.S. sanctions against
Hizbullah,[2]
suspicion immediately fell upon this organization. Lebanese media and
politicians, as well as citizens on social media, claimed that the bombing was
a message to BLOM Bank that it must stop implementing the U.S. sanctions, and
some – including the Al-Mustaqbal
daily[3]
and bankers[4]
– blamed Hizbullah for it. Many of the comments on social media were posted under
the hashtag "Hizbullah is bombing the banks."[5]
Criticism was also directed at Hizbullah's supporters, including the
pro-Hizbullah Al-Akhbar daily, who were accused of inciting against
the banks and against central bank governor Riad Salameh in the days prior to the
bombing.

Indeed, the days before the bombing saw a
harsh campaign, bordering on incitement, against Salameh and against Lebanese
banks, especially BLOM Bank, by Lebanese pro-Hizbullah activists and by Al-Akhbar. The latter accused BLOM Bank of being so eager to implement the U.S.
sanctions that it exceeded the U.S. requirements.

Hizbullah, for its part, did not condemn the
bombing and in fact refrained from commenting on it at all. Al-Akhbar, on the other hand, denied
that it was inciting against the banks and stated that Hizbullah was not
responsible for the bombing. However, even after the bombing the daily
continued to publish articles threatening "a further escalation [of the clash] between
these banks and Hizbullah"
which would impact the country's future as well as foreigners in Lebanon,
including the UNIFIL forces stationed there. In a June 24 speech, Hizbullah
secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah repeated the accusation that some Lebanese
banks were being over-enthusiastic in implementing the sanctions and warned that
this could harm Hizbullah members and supporters.

In a June 16, 2016 interview on the Lebanese
LBC channel, former Lebanese minister Wiam Wahhab, known as a Hizbullah supporter,
said that in Lebanon it is Lebanese laws that should apply, not those of the
U.S. Congress.

This report reviews the incitement against
the banks by Hizbullah supporters and by Al-Akhbar both before the
bombing and after it.

The BLOM Bank
headquarters after the bombing (image: albawaba.com, June 16, 2016)

'Al-Akhbar'
Article On Day Before Bombing: 'Hizbullah Supporters Demand Taking Punitive
Measures Against The Banks'

In the two days before the
bombing, the pro-Hizbullah daily Al-Akhbar published articles stating
that BLOM Bank was being "over-enthusiastic" in implementing the U.S.
sanctions.[6] An article by Hassan 'Aliq
published the day before the bombing, titled "Hizbullah to Banks and to [Central
Bank Governor] Salameh: Stop Conspiring [against Us]," contained implicit
threats against Salameh and against various banks, especially BLOM Bank. It
said: "Whoever follows politics in our country can hear Hizbullah leaders
saying loud and clear that the struggle against America's 'banking mandate'
[over Lebanon] is no less important than the struggle against those who wish to
harm the resistance and [disarm it of] its weapons. 'Aliq added,
"Hizbullah's MPs, ministers and officials refuse to say [how the struggle
should be waged], but the people's rage has its consequences. The public of
Hizbullah's [supporters] has begun demanding to take punitive measures against
the banks that want to implement the hostile American agenda... Some of the
[pro-]resistance public is demanding that Hizbullah publish a black list of
banks that harbor secret hostility towards the resistance, so that [people] can
punish them for their actions [of closing the accounts of Hizbullah members and
associates]. Some [people] propose to boycott [the banks] and withdraw deposits
[from them], and call to pressure the banks that are conspiring [against
Hizbullah]. Others propose more painful measures – from holding demonstrations
and sit-ins in front of banks that wish to harm the [pro-]resistance public to
holding protests that will keep the banks from opening [for business]... If
Hizbullah is forced into an open conflict, there will be no choice but to
[voice] these calls, which are [already] widespread on social media, as part of
an organized [campaign]."

Later in the
article 'Aliq quotes sources in the Hizbullah-led March 8 Forces as saying that
BLOM Bank is one of the banks that are
"going too far in implementing the racist sanctions, [even]
exceeding the American requirements." According to these sources,
"Hizbullah wants the banks and the central bank governor to stop
conspiring [against it] and stop deceiving it." They stressed that
Hizbullah is not demanding to take "harmful" measures against the
banks, only "measures to protect the social and economic security of the
Lebanese people."

'Aliq even
called on Hizbullah "to do more than just deter those responsible for the
banking sector," saying: "This sector, which is constantly amassing
wealth, needs someone to stand up to it, in days of peace just like in days of
war, and Hizbullah, which is part of the parliament and the government, must break
its silence, starting today."[7]

Threats Against Central Bank Governor,
BLOM Bank Posted On Social Media In Days Before Bombing

A campaign of verbal attacks and
even threats against the Lebanese banking sector was also evident on social
media in the days before the bombing, especially in the 24 hours that preceded
it. Hizbullah supporters on Facebook and Twitter directed harsh words at central
bank governor Riad Salameh and various banks, especially BLOM Bank. For
example, on the evening before the bombing (June 11), the pro-Hizbullah
"Dahiya" website posted on its Facebook page (Facebook.com/da7ye ) a photo of Salameh with the caption:
"Your existence is an insult to the homeland."

Another post
on this Facebook page, from June 12, accused "some banks" of being
more radical than the American law itself and blacklisting people not mentioned
by the Americans.

Yet another
post on this Facebook page, which was reposted on the website of the Kataeb
party, said: "Beware the BLOM Bank, which bragged about closing [accounts]
and restricting [them]!! #[This banks is] more Israeli than Israel."[8]

The Al-Mustaqbal daily reported on a threatening tweet posted
two days before the bombing by Pro-Hizbullah Journalist Ghassan Jawwad. He
wrote: "Hizbullah will soon [say]: A curse upon you, upon America and upon
the banks. Beware the anger of patient [men]!"[9]

Hizbullah
supporters on social media launched a "Riad Salameh Go Away" hashtag,
which they appended to many messages against him. One of the posts featured a
"list of shame" that included BLOM Bank, Salameh and the Association
of Banks in Lebanon.[10]

The "list of
shame" of banks and bankers

'Al-Akhbar': Hizbullah Not Behind Bombing; We Are Not
Inciting Against Banks But Voicing Legitimate Criticism, And Will Continue To
Do So

Immediately
after the bombing, the social networks were flooded with messages blaming
Hizbullah for it and accusing Al-Akhbar of causing it through its incitement. The Al-Mustaqbal daily,
affiliated with the March 14 Forces, as well as several Lebanese bankers, soon joined
this criticism and accusations, while Hizbullah chose to remain silent,
ignoring both the bombing and the allegations against it.

Al-Akhbar, on the
other hand, rushed to defend itself and Hizbullah. On June 13, 2016, the day
after the bombing, the daily published two articles, one unsigned and the other
by the chairman of its board of directors, Ibrahim Al-Amin, both of which
denied the allegations against Hizbullah and the daily. The first article
stated that Hizbullah was currently in conflict with several banks that had
decided to implement the U.S. sanctions against it in order to
"throttle" it and its institutions, but "some [other] element
decided to enter the picture by carrying out a bombing against BLOM Bank, in
order to implicate the resistance and thereby hobble it." The article
suggested that ISIS or Jabhat Al-Nusra (JN) were behind the bombing, since ISIS
fighters imprisoned in Lebanon had admitted to planning bombings against "non-military
institutions and in crowded areas" in Beirut, and since the Lebanese
Military Intelligence had indeed received information several days before the
bombing that JN was planning terror attacks in a certain part of the capital.
According to the article, this information had led to several foreign
embassies, including the Canadian one, as well as the UN headquarters in
Lebanon, to warn their staff to take precautions and stay away from that part
of Beirut.[11]

Al-Akhbar board of
directors chairman Ibrahim Al-Amin wrote: "[Those who] jump to conclusions
will naturally point the finger at Hizbullah, [just] because Hizbullah accused the [BLOM]
bank of excessive enthusiasm in complying with
the American demands to implement the economic sanctionson the resistance, and of
hastening to implement the American law... There will also be those who accuse
other [elements] of being behind the attack, or of paving the way to it – like,
for example, the accusations that Al-Akhbar incited against the banks, and particularly
against BLOM bank, as part of its criticism of how the government and thisbank dealt with the recent
American law...

"A party like Hizbullah has no interest
in doing something [that is, carrying out a terror attack] that would [only]
justify the [American] law… Likewise, the organization knows very well that
such operations will not stop the implementation of the American law... In this
matter, Hizbullah, like the rest of the Lebanese, wants the truth exposed, more
than anyone else...

"With regard to the accusations of
incitement by the press, particularly Al-Akhbar... ever since the daily was founded 10
years ago, we have paid the price for our criticism of the political class and
of the destructive policy of the March 14 Forces. They have always accused us
of conducting incitement against forces and individuals who were targets of
terror attacks. Nevertheless, we do not think that we should stop our mission,
that is, of criticizing a mistaken policy...

"Al-Akhbar's criticism of the banks does not only stem
from [these banks'] attempt to harm Hizbullah on the pretext of implementing
the American law. [The paper] has always taken stands disliked by the banks,
whether regarding their general policy from which they benefited, or by revealing
corruption cases connected to their work. With regard to our criticism of how
BLOM Bank is acting in the matter of implementing the American law, this is
professional criticism, and includes anyone involved in measures that are
ultimately aimed at hobbling the resistance. This criticism will continue, and
it is completely uninfluenced by what happened. No attack here or there will
stop the necessary argument about the banks' policy and actions concerning the
American sanctions – otherwise we [in Al-Akhbar] will yet arrive at the accusation that the
[banking] sector is behind the attack, with the aim of shutting people
up."[12]

Threats Against Banks,
Governor, Al-Mustaqbal Stream, And Lebanese Government Continue Even After
Bombing

Even
after the bombing, and after the accusations against Hizbullah, Al-Akhbar continued
to publish articles supporting Hizbullah's demands and threatened a harsh
response and dangerous escalation from it if it they were not met.

The
day after the bombing, the Association of Banks in Lebanon met, and later
released an announcement condemning the attack on BLOM Bank that stated, inter
alia: "The banks operate in a most professional manner and in the
framework of the regulations that are common in global markets, and in Lebanon
they are subject to the laws of the land and to the directives of the [central]
bank of Lebanon, with the aim of preserving the interests of all Lebanese
citizens."

Al-Akhbar, which in
several articles published prior to the bombing had said that BLOM Bank had
been quite enthusiastic in its implementation of the sanctions, going beyond
what was required by the governor, interpreted this announcement as
capitulation on the part of BLOM and other banks, and as a withdrawal from
their previous "enthusiasm" in implementing the sanctions, which,
according to the paper, had been manifested in the closure of accounts whose
owners were not included in the American sanctions list, of their own accord,
without waiting for approval by the central bank, as noted in the governor's
instructions."[13]

At the same time, another Al-Akhbar article
stated that even this capitulation on the part of the banks following the
bombing – that is, their agreement to wait for the governor's approval before
closing the accounts of people who are not on the sanctions list – was not
going to satisfy Hizbullah. The organization, it said, was demanding that they
circumvent sanctions on bank accounts whose owners actually are on the list. A
June 16, 2016 article in the paper quoted sources in the Hizbullah-led March 8
Forces as saying, "Clearly, there is only one door leading to a solution
[to the crisis]: The U.S. sanctions list is not sacred and the central bank
governor and the banks must find the appropriate ways to circumvent it, where
the national need requires it."[14]

Even After Bombing,
Al-Akhbar Threatens Al-Mustaqbal Stream And The Future Of The Country, Saying:
There Will Be Further Escalation

On
June 14, 2016, two days after the bombing, Al-Akhbar published another article that warned that
"if some of the banks do not understand that they must be neutral" in
the matter of the U.S. sanctions, then "we will witness a further
escalation [of the clash] between these banks and Hizbullah, which considers
itself bound to defend the economic security of its public. In this clash, the
biggest loser will necessarily be the Lebanese banks."[15]

Al-Akhbar Article Warns
Al-Mustaqbal Against Supporting Sanctions: It Will Have Repercussions for
Lebanon's Future

Al-Akhbar's implied threats were also directed at the
Al-Mustaqbal
faction, Hizbullah's political rival. On June 17, 2016, Al-Akhbar
columnist Hiyam Al-Kossayfi wrote about Al-Mustaqbal's "enthusiastic"
support for the sanctions against Hizbullah, while warning of the repercussions
this could have for the entire country: "Some people are reminded today of
the events of 2005 [the assassination of Lebanese prime minister Rafiq
al-Hariri], and of what came later, and also [of the events] of May 7 [2008,
i.e., Hizbullah's armed takeover of parts of Lebanon],[16] and all the repercussions
[of these events], including the bombings and assassinations..." Al-Kossayfi
urged the Al-Mustaqbal
faction not to delude itself that the U.S. law would harm Hizbullah's status in
Lebanon, and warned it of the organization's possible reaction, which would not
only affect the relations between Al-Mustaqbal and Hizbullah and "the
internal struggle between those who defend the [U.S.] law and those who oppose
it," but would impinge on "the future of Lebanon... the regime, and the
role and status of the state."[17]

Al-Akhbar Board Chairman:
Hizbullah Is The Only Force That Can Fill The Vacuum If The State Collapses

In
his article from June 13, Al-Akhbar board chairman Ibrahim Al-Amin even
threatened that Hizbullah might take over most of Lebanon. He speculated that the U.S. is plotting to
undermine Lebanon's regime and bring about the collapse of the state, and declared
that, in such a situation, Hizbullah – thanks to its military and economic
abilities and its strong ties with Iran – would be the only force capable of undertaking
the role of the state in large parts of the country. He wrote: "In the
current state of affairs, Hizbullah may be the only force capable of best filling
the vacuum that would result from the collapse of the state. This organization
and the large public that supports it together form a financial force that can
provide employment to nearly 1,000,000 Lebanese citizens. [I refer] not only to
party members and the employees in [Hizbullah's] institutions, but to people
who sell consumer products – from veils, automobiles, phones, milk and flour to
weapons. Hizbullah also has close ties with Iran, and within a few months Iran
can launch large-scale projects to supply electricity, water and public
services to everyone living in Hizbullah's areas of influence.

"If the West thinks that the economic
crisis will bring about the collapse of the [Lebanese] state and its
institutions, Hizbullah is the only force that has the security and military
capabilities to take over large parts of Lebanon. Thanks to its alliances [with
other forces in the state,] its [area of]
influence will expand to include most of Lebanon, except for a few
regions..." Asking, "What will be the fate of the banking sector
itself?", Al-Amin answered that it will lose its independence and much of
the wealth it has amassed.

Al-Amin concluded: "Some people need a
pinch to the ear, not to the arm, in order to understand that they cannot
plunge the entire country into madness... as happened after the assassination
of Rafiq Al-Hariri. [These people] will find it difficult to force us to
respect them, for they have decided to capitulate to an external [force] that
has never brought us anything but trouble."

In
this article Al-Amin also directed implicit threats at UNIFIL and at other
foreign nationals in the country. He asked: "[After Hizbullah takes over
the country], what shall we do with some 14,000 foreigners living in Lebanon,
including the soldiers and officers of UNIFIL, diplomatic staff, workers in the
business, media and academic sectors, and the workers of international
organizations and NGOs? What will the Western [intelligence] apparatuses operating
in Lebanon do, not only against Hizbullah but also for their agents in
Syria?..."[18]

Hassan Nasrallah:
We Will Not Let Our Public Be Harmed; Hizbullah's Funds Come From Iran

In
a June 24, 2016 speech marking 40 days after the death of Hizbullah leader
Mustafa Badr Al-Din, Hizbullah secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah reiterated
his organization's position on the U.S. sanctions, warning against their implementation
and stating that they harm Lebanon's sovereignty and large sectors of the
Lebanese public. He also repeated his claim that the sanctions would not harm
Hizbullah, admitting for
the first time that all of Hizbullah's funds come from Iran and adding that the
money, just like the organization's missiles, does not come from the banks and therefore
no law can prevent it from being transferred.

He stressed that Hizbullah's public is
starting to suffer because some Lebanese banks, "more American than the
Americans," have exceeded the American requirements by closing accounts of
organizations and charities that do not even appear on the U.S. sanctions list,
just because figures involved with them have family ties with Hizbullah
members. Nasrallah said that this infuriates Hizbullah, and added: "We
will not allow any measures that harm our members and our public." He stated
that his organization was open to dialogue aimed at finding solutions and
admitted that such talks were currently taking place between the sides, but
that this did not imply "any
consent to the [U.S.] law on our part." He also accused unnamed
"Lebanese figures" that they had visited Washington and incited the
Americans to pass the sanctions law.[19]

Three days after Nasrallah's speech, Al-Akhbar board
chairman Ibrahim Al-Amin wrote in an article that former Lebanese prime
minister and Al-Mustaqbal faction head Sa'd Al-Hariri had transferred to the
Americans, "either directly of via his functionaries in state and private
financial institutions," names of figures he wanted added to the sanctions
list "on the grounds that they finance Hizbullah's activity."[20]

In
a June 16, 2016 interview on the Lebanese LBC channel, former Lebanese minister
Wiam Wahhab, known for his pro-Hizbullah positions, called on all supporters of
the March 8 Forces to boycott the banks that implement that U.S. sanctions and
start using euros instead of dollars. He also said that in Lebanon it is
Lebanese laws that should apply, not those of the U.S. Congress.

[16] This refers to violent
clashes that broke out on May 7, 2008, when Hizbullah took over large parts of
Beirut, the Mount Lebanon region and the north of the country; paralyzed the
airport and seaport; burned the studios of media networks affiliated with its
political rivals, who were then in power; and besieged public institutions and
government offices, as well as the homes of anti-Syrian Lebanese figures. At
least 81 people were killed in these clashes and some 250 were wounded. See
MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No.436, A Clean Sweep: Amal,
Hizbullah Take Much of Beirut in Redux of Hamas' Gaza Takeover, May 9,
2008.

E. B. Picaliis a
research fellow at MEMRI.Source: http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/9283.htm Follow Middle East and Terrorism on TwitterCopyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.