Shaquille O’Neal’s Legacy on the Line?
Reviewed by Momizat on
Apr 15.
With the NBA playoffs set to soon begin, it’s rather easy to get caught up in player legacies. Indeed, the way athletes perform during the postseason has a hugeWith the NBA playoffs set to soon begin, it’s rather easy to get caught up in player legacies. Indeed, the way athletes perform during the postseason has a huge
Rating:

Shaquille O’Neal’s Legacy on the Line?

With the NBA playoffs set to soon begin, it’s rather easy to get caught up in player legacies. Indeed, the way athletes perform during the postseason has a huge bearing on how we remember or view their careers as a whole. For instance, Tracy McGrady had some incredible playoff performances and yet failed to make it out of the first round of the playoffs of every series that he has played in. No one will mention that his teams were never once favored to win (playing against better teams will often do that), but sadly that is probably how he will be remembered.

We could even make the argument that Kevin Garnett was headed that way until he landed in Boston (although he did make an appearance in the 2004 Western Conference Finals).

But let’s go to the other side of the spectrum and look at “winners”. Think about these names for a moment: Karl Malone, Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade, Steve Nash, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce. That is certainly a great list of stars; especially when we take into account their combined eight MVP trophies and four NBA Finals MVP awards. We are essentially talking about Hall of Fame players. Consequently, we would expect anyone that played with these athletes to have at some point in time experienced some type of greatness or perhaps great postseason moments; or as people like to say: Rings.

Seen in that light, can we say that Shaquille O’Neal winning four championships is a sign of underachievement? Hold that thought for a moment and travel back in time with me.

It’s the summer of 1984 and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar who has already won three NBA titles (after having played with Oscar Robertson earlier in his career and then Magic Johnson) decides that he wants out of Los Angeles. He forces his way out to Chicago to team up with a young and upcoming star by the name of Michael Jordan. By their second season (1985-86) together, they win an NBA championship while Magic’s Lakers entirely miss the playoffs.

Having grown happy with his success, Kareem becomes complacent and the Bulls get swept in the first round a year after winning the title. Abdul-Jabbar is traded during the following season (1987-88), but this time is sent to a team with an established hierarchy of stars; as he is asked to fit in with John Stockton and Karl Malone. The team develops some chemistry late in the season and enters the playoffs with momentum but is defeated by Hakeem Olajuwon’s Houston Rockets in the first round of the playoffs.

The following season (1988-89), the Jazz decide to trade Kareem to Atlanta to play alongside Dominique Wilkins. The Hawks display great unity during the regular season and enter the playoffs as the prohibitive favorites to win the NBA title. The Atlanta Hawks breeze through the first round but are upset by an aging but still productive Boston squad that consists of Larry Bird and Kevin McHale who rounded up into shape by then after facing multiple injuries during the season.

Instead of retiring, Abdul-Jabbar signs as a free agent in the summer of 1989 with the Celtics with the hope of winning one last title. Sadly our DeLorean (Back to the Future reference) picks us up and brings us back to the present without telling us what happened to those bizarro Celtics (you know, Bird, McHale and Abdul-Jabbar on the same team).

By the time our journey to the past and back has ended, all we remember is that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar played with Oscar Robertson, Magic Johnson, Michael Jordan, John Stockton, Karl Malone, Dominique Wilkins, Larry Bird and Kevin McHale; winning four titles in the process. Granted the story is incomplete, but would you feel as though he underachieved?

Obviously that situation never happened but it does help put Shaquille O’Neal’s career into context. He is arguably the most dominant center we have ever seen and yet several fans and media members feel as though he could have done a little bit more during his career. Granted, much like Kareem in our fictional scenario, it’s important to look at the teams and players he faced during his career.

Have a look at how Shaquille O’Neal’s teams have fared in the postseason:

If you’re scoring at home, the Diesel lost series to Miller, Olajuwon, Jordan, Stockton and Malone, Tim Duncan, a starless Pistons team, a scrappy Bulls team and finally Garnett, Pierce and Allen.

There is no shame to losing to the legendary players listed above, however one cannot overlook the numerous sweeps that O’Neal’s teams have been on the wrong end of. Furthermore, losing to the Detroit Pistons (in five games) has to go down as one of the greatest upsets in NBA Finals history; and couple that with his Miami Heat team getting swept in the first round of the 2007 playoffs and it becomes awfully tough to discount the possibility that perhaps the Diesel should have done more.

Some might say that perhaps we are holding him to a high standard, but my reply to that would be: how else are we supposed to judge all time greats? Let’s have a peak at the Diesel’s career numbers:

28, 596 points (seventh most all time)

13,099 rebounds (13th most all time)

2,732 blocks (eighth most all time)

23.7 points per game (21st in NBA history)

10.9 rebounds per game (32nd in NBA history)

2.3 blocks per game (15th in NBA history)

58.2 field goal percentage (1)

26.4 player efficiency rating (third best in NBA history)

O’Neal’s productivity as well as his longevity have allowed him to reach some impressive career totals in points, rebounds and blocks. His per game averages have taken a dip in the past few seasons given the Diesel’s diminished role with his respective teams. His career numbers do not fully capture just how destructive of a force he was during his peak years; routinely bulldozing through two or three defenders to score.

As evidenced by his PER numbers, less than a handful of NBA players were more efficient than O’Neal with the ball, and yet I cannot shake the feeling that Shaq should have been right up there with Kareem and Wilt, but he ultimately fell short.

The bridges he burned with former teams as well as superstars leads one to believe that no matter how great he was, he was also partly responsible for his teams not always maximizing their talents. How else do we explain that Shaquille O’Neal has been swept six times out of the playoffs while Abdul-Jabbar and Chamberlain were swept a combined four times (Kareem saw the broom three times while Wilt only saw it once)?

Ultimately, Shaq might be remembered as the “Imagine If Guy”: imagine if he had stayed in Orlando, imagine if he wasn’t often injured, imagine if he cared about being great defensively, imagine if Shaq had come into shape in 2002-03, imagine if he and Kobe could have patched things up, imagine if Miami had taken their title defense seriously, imagine if Shaq and the Suns had defeated the Spurs in the first round, imagine if Shaq hadn’t gotten hurt before the 2010 playoffs started with the Cavs and finally, imagine if Shaq had played a little more than half of the season with the Celtics this year.

As we head towards the end of Shaquille O’Neal’s career, we can probably all agree that he is easily in the top 20 of all time best players in league history. Sadly, his legacy will probably be that of a star that could and should have made it into the prestigious and heavily debated top 5 of all time but ultimately fell short.

Remember when Kobe Bryant was asked after his game 7 triumph over the Celtics last season what this championship meant to him? His answer: “I got one more than Shaq. You can take that to bank”.

And he was right. Just imagine if…

Questions or comments? Feel free to leave them in the comments section or you can contact me by email at JM.Poulard@Warriorsworld.net. You can also find me on Twitter with the handle name @ShyneIV.

About The Author

J.M. Poulard is the Warriors World editor. He is also a contributor to ESPN TrueHoop sites Forum Blue and Gold (Los Angeles Lakers), Piston Powered (Detroit Pistons) and Raptors Republic (Toronto Raptors). He has a particular fondness for watching Eastern Conference ball games and enjoys the history of the sport. Feel free to reach out to him on Twitter (@ShyneIV).

I think Shaq could have easily been a top 5 player if he had put his mind to it. He was an absolutely unstoppable, unguardable scorer in his prime but never seemed to put the same energy into defence or rebounding. He also never seemed to care about staying in shape. His earliest injury problems were related to him being over weight. I also once saw him in an interview where he made fun of people who eat healthy and take vitamins (he said that) and that he’d still “bust them up” without needing diet and exercise, an attitude that would come back to haunt him later. If he had focussed on all facets of his game (including being a good teammate and physical conditioning) instead of predicating his game on his ability to bull his way to the rim he probably would’ve won 6 out of 8 titles the way Jordan did, and it wouldn’t have taken him until 1999-2000 to start winning them. In my mind even the 2000-2002 threepeat is somewhat tainted because (lets not forget) Portland committed what is arguably the biggest choke in NBA history when it gave the Lakers game 7 in the 2000 conference finals (and no LA didn’t take it, Portland gave it to them). Even the 2002 title has to be considered a little suspect because most people outside of LA will agree that the Lakers probably couldn’t have gotten to the finals that year without the now infamous snow job the officials pulled on the Kings. Now I’m not trying to take those titles away from him, because he was still the best center and most dominant player of that era. But he could have been better, and he shouldn’t have needed help from other teams choking and duplicitous officiating to win some of the titles that he did.

Kenny Seagle, Emperor of the North

huh????

shaq’s legacy started yrs ago….. about the time his career ended…..

ANY QUESTIONS???????

Kate C

Great article, JM.

Like many people, I’ve always felt that Shaq had the talent to do more, but you’ve given some very interesting perspective to support that argument.

Holly

Nice article, J.M.

I agree that Shaq underachieved, even taking into account how dominant he was during the three peat. Sure people will remember him for his dominance but fans and other players will also remember his arrogance and team-killing. All of his talks about winning championships or bringing championships to places only happened when he had an amazing two guard (Kobe, Wade). It really is a shame he couldn’t have cared more, couldn’t have coexisted with Kobe or Wade more, and cared about being great more. The negatives outweigh the positives when it comes to Shaq.

ignarus

you say he should be up there with kareem and wilt, but don’t put wilt’s career playoff losses up there next to shaq’s…to put it simply, he IS up there with kareem and wilt. i just don’t buy it that people are going to remember shaq for his being old more than the complete dominance over the game that he had in his prime.