Dr. Pollnitz is an assistant professor of History and an early modern historian whose research focuses on the transmission of knowledge and ideas in Europe and the Atlantic. Her first book on Princely education in early modern Britain was published by Cambridge University Press in 2015. It shows how humanist education transformed political and religious culture by contributing to the growth of royal power and significant opposition to it in Tudor and Stuart Britain. Dr. Pollnitz‚Äôs research for this project was supported by fellowships from Trinity College, Cambridge and the Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington, DC. Princely education won the 2016 Royal Historical Society‚Äôs Whitfield Prize.

In the sixteenth century, Erasmus of Rotterdam led a humanist campaign to deter European princes from vainglorious warfare by giving them liberal educations. His prescriptions for the study of classical authors and scripture transformed the upbringing of Tudor and Stuart royal children. Rather than emphasising the sword, the educations of Henry VIII, James VI and I, and their successors prioritised the pen. In a period of succession crises, female sovereignty, and minority rulers, liberal education played a hitherto unappreciated role in reshaping the political and religious thought and culture of early modern Britain. This book explores how a humanist curriculum gave princes the rhetorical skills, biblical knowledge, and political impetus to assert the royal supremacy over their subjects' souls. Liberal education was meant to prevent over-mighty monarchy but in practice it taught kings and queens how to extend their authority over church and state.

¬†

Explores the dynamic relationship between political and religious thought and culture, and the real impact of ideas on early modern social practices and confessional life

Uses hitherto neglected printed and archival sources, marginalia, and school exercises to reveal the intellectual and political formation of Tudor and Stuart monarchs

Offers readers a fresh perspective on the impact of monarchs' own confessional identities on the doctrine and government of English and Scottish churches