Where Islam spreads, freedom dies

I posted before about the negro rapist who targeted blonde, blue-eyed women and girls in Paris, and asked their religion and nationality before raping them. He has now been caught. In fact he was already in prison for another offence, of theft this time, in Belgium. The French authorities are arranging for him to be extradited to face trial in France. His fingerprints led to his detection.

The first attack that is known about goes back to 23 December, close to the porte d'Orléans (XIVe arrondissement). A young blonde with blue eyes - like all the other known victims of this psychopath - saw him come out of nowhere at around 1.30 in the morning when she opened the door. He followed her into the apartement, took money from her and raped her in her own home while her family was sleeping in the rooms to the side. Then he forced her to go to the bank to take out a bit more money.

In the second attack, on the same day, around 8.30 in the morning, the man attacked another woman, in the XVe arrondissement, close to the Convention metro station. He took her credit card and pin code. This time the victim fought back. He stabbed her 19 times before abusing her, leaving her for dead.

The third attack that is known about took place on 28 December, in an estate in Étampes (Essonne). His prey was an adolescent of 15 years. He forced her, by threatening her with a knife, to take him to her home. But the girl did not let him do it and forced her away. He then stabbed her twice and tried to strangle her, before raping her with extreme brutality. There, too, he stole money from her.

Two recent studies have confirmed that people living in the parts of Britain that have been most heavily colonised by aliens are the last happy, and vice versa.

Last week, a study commissioned by the property website Rightmove found that Carlisle was the happiest place in England. Carlisle has experienced very little African or Asian colonisation.

Chris Brand (a former psychology lecturer at Edinburgh University who was sacked for saying negroes were less intelligent than other races) commented on the study on his blog, the G Factor.

A study by the property website Rightmove found that people in Carlisle, Cumbria [aka Cumberland], were the happiest in England, while those living in east London were the least content with their surroundings (D. Telegraph, 14 ii, Murray Wardrop). Researchers assessed towns on how residents felt about their area, the size and condition of homes, neighbourliness and safety levels.

Carlisle scored highest, followed by other largely-White places like York, Huddersfield, Harrogate, Chester and Llandudno. The only southern towns in the Top Ten were the White locations of Norwich, Dorchester and Exeter. By contrast, nine of the ten lowest scoring towns and cities were in the south, according to the survey. All the east London districts (largely Black-infested) were classed with the lowest scores, followed by Ilford, south-east London, Luton and Romford. Pakistani-invaded Oldham was the only northern town in the bottom ten of the website's Happy At Home Index.

1. East London 2. Ilford 3. South-east London 4. Luton 5. Romford 6. Oldham 7. Enfield {which just 30 years previously had leading young Conservative Michael Portillo as its MP} 8. North London {where I grew up, then an entirely peaceful if dull area where many people had their own gardens and children could get to grammar school in Barnet} 9. West London 10. Harrow.

Today, a government-conducted study revealed essentially the same results. The two unhappiest parts of the country are East London and the West Midlands, both areas that have been mass-colonised by Muslims. By contrast, the happiest is Northern Ireland, which is probably the part of the United Kingdom that has been least colonised by non-Europeans.

In a survey of 80,000 people’s happiness, the first of its kind, the ONS found that men aged between 45 and 49 are the least satisfied with life in the UK.

Conversely, men and women aged between 65 and 80 are the most satisfied. This is followed closely by teenagers aged between 16 and 19.

London or the West Midlands are the gloomiest regions. People who live here are the least happy with their lives and also value the worth of what they do with their lives less than people in other regions. The findings come despite London being the wealthiest part of the country by some distance.

The happiest place in the UK, and also the one with the highest levels of life satisfaction and feelings of worth, is Northern Ireland, the ONS found.

The highest levels of life satisfaction in the UK were found among white, Indian and other Asian groups. The lowest level was found among black, African, Caribbean or black British groups.

Members of the Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities were found to have the highest levels of anxiety.

This is not surprising. These people have been cut off from their historical roots and bereft of their own peoplehood. They are now just a bunch of nationless savages reduced to eternal whining about how Whitey doesn't give them enough respect or money.

These are selfish people. Their emigration to Britain was motivated primarily by greed. Their countries were poor but they were their own. They could have remained and worked hard to turn their countries into desirable places to live. In the 1950s, Taiwan and South Korea were poorer than many countries in sub-Saharan Africa. But the people there worked hard and now have standards of living comparable with the West. Those who came to Britain as colonists could have made the same choice; but they opted for the easy route to riches instead, abandoning their own peoplehood and making themselves an eternal infringement on ours. Or perhaps not so eternal.

BC director-general Mark Thompson has claimed Christianity is treated with far less sensitivity than other religions because it is ‘pretty broad shouldered’.

He suggested other faiths have a ‘very close identity with ethnic minorities’, and were therefore covered in a far more careful way by broadcasters.

But he also revealed that producers had to consider the possibilities of ‘violent threats’ instead of polite complaints if they pushed ahead with certain types of satire.

Mr Thompson said: ‘Without question, “I complain in the strongest possible terms”, is different from, “I complain in the strongest possible terms and I am loading my AK47 as I write”. This definitely raises the stakes.’

But he added that religion as a whole should never receive the same ‘protection and sensitivity’ in the law as race.

This story really shows how far gone we are. Note the Muslim guard wasn't even present when he made his remark but the man was forcibly detained until he apologised to the Muslim!

As David Jones arrived at the security gates at Gatwick airport, he was looking forward to getting through swiftly so he could enjoy lunch with his daughters before their flight.

Placing his belongings, including a scarf, into a tray to pass through the X-ray scanner he spotted a Muslim woman in hijab pass through the area without showing her face.

In a light-hearted aside to a security official who had been assisting him, he said: “If I was wearing this scarf over my face, I wonder what would happen.”

The quip proved to be a mistake. After passing through the gates, he was confronted by staff and accused of racism.

As his daughters, who had passed through security, waited in the departure lounge wondering where he was, he was subjected to a one hour stand-off as officials tried to force him to apologise.

Mr Jones, 67, who is the creator of the popular children’s character Fireman Sam, said: “Something like George Orwell’s 1984 now seems to have arrived in Gatwick airport.

"I feel that my rights as an individual have been violated. What I underwent amounts to intimidation and detention. I was humiliated and degraded in full public view.

"I am a 67-year-old pensioner and have lived my life within the law. I do not have even one point on my driving licence.”

He said that when he made his initial remark the security guard had appeared to agree with him, saying: “I know what you mean, but we have our rules, and you aren’t allowed to say that.”

As he went through the metal detecting arch, his artificial hip set off the alarm, prompting a full search from a guard. It was after this, and as he prepared to rejoin his two grown-up daughters, that he was confronted by another guard who said he was being detained because he had made an offensive remark.

“I repeated to her what I had said and told her that I had said nothing racist,” he said. “She took my passport and boarding pass and I was then escorted back through the security zone into the outer area. Here the female security guard proceeded to question me further, inferring many things that I had not said.

“It was impossible to get her to listen to reason. We were then joined by a second female security guard who stated that she was Muslim and was deeply distressed by my comment.

“I again stated that I had not made a racist remark but purely an observation that we were in a maximum security situation being searched thoroughly whilst a woman with her face covered walked through. I made no reference to race or religion. I did not swear or raise my voice.”

According to Mr Jones, who was due to board a British Airways flight to Portugal, where he now lives and runs a restaurant on the Algarve, the British Airways duty manager was then called in and sided with the security staff.

He continued: “I had now been detained for some time and my daughters were worried, calling me on my phone asking what was happening. We were going around in circles. I maintained that I had said nothing offensive and the security guard was continuing to accuse me. This had taken about 15-20 minutes and looked as though it was not going to be resolved.

“I asked the security guard if she was going to charge me to which she said no but I could not leave until I had apologised to the Muslim guard.

“At this point I asked for the attendance of a police officer. After some time he arrived but it was also plainly evident that he was keeping to the politically correct code. I told him that if there was a case then he should arrest me.

“I was told that we now live in a different time and some things are not to be said. They decided again that I would only be allowed to continue on my journey if I were to apologise to the Muslim guard. My reply was that as I had not made a racist remark it would be impossible for me to apologise.”

Mr Jones, a former member of the Household Cavalry and retired fireman, added: “I felt that I made a logical observation. That while everyone was being subjected to an invasive search it was illogical that someone should be let through with their face covered. I am not opposed to having this level of security but it must be equal for all.”

Eventually, Mr Jones said, the BA manager suggested that he should agree that what he had said “could” be considered offensive by a Muslim guard.

With his flight departure time now fast approaching Mr Jones agreed to the compromise.

Escorted by the police officer, he was taken through security where he was again subjected to a full search after his hip replacement set off the metal detector alarms.

Mr Jones said he intended to complain formally to the Gatwick airport authorities and British Airways about the incident last Sunday.

Department for Transport rules do not prevent people covering their faces at UK airports for religious reasons.

However, all passengers must show their faces to UK Borders officials when they pass through passport control. Muslim women who wear hijabs can request that their identity is checked by a female immigration officer and they can also ask that they be taken to a private room before they remove their head wear.

A spokesman for Gatwick airport said: “The security team are examining the incident to ensure that the issue was managed in the right way.

"They are talking to the people involved to understand what the issue was and how it came to have the police involved.”

Note the way he keeps defending himself by saying he "hadn't made a racist remark", as if this treatment would be justified if he had made a racist remark. This shows how even people who have some courage and some awareness of how damaging state-sanctioned thought control is have nonetheless absorbed and internalised many of its key tenets. Even if he had made a racist remark, who cares? People are allowed to be racists and allowed to make racist remarks. Neither racism nor racist remarks, in and of themselves, are crimes (yet), although many people, including the police themselves, contrive to give the opposite impression.

It would be interesting to know how many of the people involved in this drama were of third-world origin.

Yesterday the beleaguered but heroic Scottish Defence League held a demo in Glasgow, massively outnumbered by "anti-fascist" counter-protesters and the police.

The unelected (appointed through the regional list system) MSP Humza Yousaf (SNP), an associate of Hamas terror commander Mohammed Sawalha, had organised a petition demanding that the original request to carry out a march be denied. All of Scotland's party political leaders signed the petition. Not one Scottish newspaper has ever reported on Humza Yousaf's Hamas connections. This is an organisation whose charter is riddled with the most virulent antisemitism, yet when Yousaf accuses the SDL of peddling "vile, toxic hate" he is still taken seriously. I sent information about Yousaf's Hamas ties to various journalists. Not one responded. I wrote a letter to the Herald about it. It wasn't printed. We are living in a Soviet-type environment in which truth doesn't matter. Evidence doesn't matter. Reason doesn't matter. Democracy doesn't matter. Nothing matters except conformity with the approved ideology of the state.

At least when a decision has to be made on whether someone should be extradited to the US, their government has to demonstrate that there is “probable cause”. A large number of countries, including all EU states, and others such as Azerbaijan, Peru, Sierra Leone and Bangladesh, have no need to demonstrate any basis for extradition. All they have to do is assert that they want to extradite an individual. British judges are not allowed to examine the merits of the case.

Whoever signed this deal should be put on trial for treason. Some of the most savage Muslims in Britain are Bangladeshis. Choudary is a Bangladeshi name. Baroness Uddin is from Bangladesh. The Tower Hamlets takeover was organised by Bangladeshis. Now these primitives can extradite British people at will? They could charge you with "Insulting the Prophet", demand your extradition to face trial in Bangladesh and British courts would be powerless to prevent it.

This is a demonstration recently held in Paris by something calling itself the "Association of Angry, Badly-Housed People". Although they already live in government-provided housing, apparently its standard doesn't meet their exacting quality requirements.

They are also upset that the housing association was keeping a file on tenants which included details of their nationality, criminal records and the substances they were addicted to. What's wrong with that? It makes sense to put all the Congolese mugger heroin junkies in one building. Makes it easier for them to share needles and exchange tips on good mugging spots, etc.

What a striking contrast in the newspapers today. First we have a desperate British girl who goes to the police begging for help, telling them she is being systematically raped by Muslim gangs. They decide not to pursue their investigation and her ordeal goes on.

A girl aged 15 was used for sex by more than 20 men after police failed to act when the teenager told officers that she was being passed around members of the British Pakistani community, a court was told yesterday.

The schoolgirl, who was allegedly under the control of a child pimp, is said to have swapped sex for food, vodka and petty cash. The abuse happened across northwest England in houses, flats, cars and taxis.

When she resisted instructions to sleep with strangers, the teenager said she faced physical violence or threats that her mother would be “told everything”.

When the girl refused to sleep with one man immediately after having sex with his companion, she said she was grabbed by the throat, pushed against a wall and called a “white bitch”.

“I didn’t think I had a choice. After a while, it was like I didn’t care any more about anything. It was like it wasn’t me,” she said.

The girl is one of five teenagers from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, aged from 13 to 15, who were allegedly groomed then subjected to a series of sex offences by numerous men over a two-year period.

In a filmed interview in August 2008, the girl gave a police officer a detailed account of sex offences allegedly committed against her by a 59-year-old man, who cannot be named. She said the man raped her and also forced her to have sex with other men.

A jury at Liverpool Crown Court has been told that detectives failed to act on her allegations. Between the police interview and the time she became pregnant five months later, the girl is said to have slept with a further 21 men.

So the British girl ignore a 15-year-old girl being gang raped by Muslims. But when it comes to really serious crime like, you know, staging a protest outside a Muslim-owned takeaway shop or maybe smashing a window, you can be sure the police and their political masters will mobilise every resource available.

Assistant Chief Constable Terry Sweeney, of Greater Manchester police, said officers were "aware of the tensions in the borough that have come about because of an ongoing court case in Liverpool".

He said there would be a significant police presence in coming weeks and urged the community to act responsibly "during this difficult time".

Police stressed that all the business premises connected to the Liverpool trial were under new ownership. The leader of Rochdale council, Colin Lambert, said the vast majority of people in the area were law-abiding.

Superintendent Chris Hankinson, who is based in Rochdale, described Thursday night's events as "unacceptable". Police were viewing CCTV images and hoped to make more arrests.

"I want to reassure the communities of both Heywood and Rochdale that an increased police presence will be out on the streets in coming days to prevent any repeat of last night's scenes," Hankinson said on Friday. He said the disorder would not break the long history of partnership and community cohesion.

It is not just the Muslim rapists who should be on trial. It is the police, the politicians and the journalists who knew what they were doing for years and let them get away with it because they didn't want to disturb the illusion of "community cohesion".

A Paki living in Spain named Imran Farasat has launched a petition calling for the Koran to be banned. He has sent it to numerous government officials, ministries and organisations.

His petition has 10 points:

The Koran is not a sacred and religious book, but a violent book, full of hatred and discrimination.

The Koran is a horrible book which provokes a community which calls itself Muslims to undertake jihad, kill innocent people and destroy the peace of the world.

The Koran is responsible for all the terrorism we have seen in recent years in which thousands of people lost their lives.

The Koran is a book which contains evil teachings and forces its believers to capture the entire world and total power at any price.

The Koran is a book which legally permits and incites hatred and violence and for that reason it is not compatible with the modern world including Spain.

The Koran is a book which directly discriminates between human beings

The Koran is a book which does not permit freedom of expression or religious freedom

The Koran is a book which causes women to suffer and be tortured by means of its unjust and macho laws.

The Koran is a book which rather than teach unity, teaches disunity and in this way does not allow its believers to form friendships with those who are not Muslim, because in the eyes of the Koran they are infidels.

The Koran is a major threat to the free society of Spain. A book which clearly offers a message of jihad, killing, hating, discrimination and vengeance for that reason cannot be compatible with the Spanish system in any sense. It is a book totally contrary to what the law and constitution of Spain say. And it is inciting hatred and violence in our country.

Farasat is a Pakistani citizen with legal residence in Spain as a political refugee. He has his own blog called World Without Islam. It's mostly in Spanish but there is some material in other languages, including English.

A new Islamophobia hotline and website has been launched in Britain so the Muslims can collect statistics and use them to demand even further repression of free speech. The great and good were in attendance including the sickening Peter Oborne and Eric Pickles who, a few days, about was trumpeting the importance of affirming "British values".

Faith Matters today launched the TELL MAMA (Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks) campaign which will provide support to those who have suffered anti-Muslim attacks in England as well as mapping, analysing and collecting data on areas where such attacks are prevailent. The launch was attended by Peter Oborne, a columnist from the Telegraph, the Rt Hon Simon Hughes MP and the Secretary of State for the Department for Communities and Local Government, the Rt Hon Eric Pickles MP. The TELL MAMA campaign was also mentioned in the Integration Strategy that was launched by the Department today.

Faith Matters conveys its thanks to the range of partners that attended the launch today and to the Community Security Trust which has been a trailblazer in monitoring hate crimes against Jewish communities in England. All hate crime is wrong and we will be working to ensure that anti-Muslim hate crimes are recorded and those who suffer such attacks, receive support through a one-stop shop signposting and guidance service which is being co-ordinated through Faith Matters.

Faith Matters believes that faith and non-faith communities should have the chance to live their lives free from fear and threats and that we all deserve a future built on this basic human right. So if you are the subject of an anti-Muslim attack in the future, TELL MAMA. Do not suffer in silence and report it!

Note that they define the creation or distribution of "anti-Muslim literature" as an "anti-Muslim attack".

A repulsive article about the launch by Leon Poosavi (Muslim?) appears on the Huffington Post. It gives the impression of having been written for a bet about how many times the word 'Islamophobia' could be crammed into one article.

Over the past four years, my own research about Islamophobia has highlighted the need to recognise and challenge Islamophobia. This is evidenced in the growth of the far right across Europe over the last 10 years and more disturbingly, the increasing tendency for their Islamophobic rhetoric to be replicated in the mainstream. For example, a recent poll showed that 45% of Britons are not ashamed to admit that they think there are 'too many' Muslims in Britain. Numerous other studies also suggest similar widespread suspicion and dislike of Muslims.

Note he admits that virtually a majority of Britons are hostile to Islam, so these people are not just calling for the repression of views with which they disagree; they are calling for the repression of democracy itself.

He also repeats the charge that "Islamophobes" are ignorant of Islam.

While the reporting and monitoring of Islamophobic incidents is long overdue and can be a major leap forward, it must also be coupled with proactive efforts by people of all faiths to engage in dialogue to overcome the ignorance that unnecessarily pushes people apart.

The truth, of course, is exactly the opposite. Those who are most hostile to Islam tend to be those who are most knowledgeable about it. It is the big-hearted naifs, like the people in Faith Matters, who are ignorant of what they are embracing.

The good news is that Islam eventually cures the naivety of everyone it comes into contact with. For Europe, the question is whether it will cure it fast enough.

IFOP has just posted the results of wide-ranging polling on what Europeans think about Islam. The graphic above shows the answers for the question asked below. (I've adapted the graphic from the one with French text.)

Would you say that the presence of a Muslim community in France/Germany/the Netherlands/the United Kingdom is ...?

An alleged rapist and child pimp told a 15-year-old girl that he was doing nothing wrong by delivering her to numerous Pakistani men for sex because “in his country you’re allowed to have sex with girls from the age of 11”, a court was told yesterday.The 59-year-old man, who cannot be named, is one of 11 men accused of a series of sexual offences over a two-year period against young teenagers from Rochdale, Greater Manchester.

Five vulnerable girls, aged from 13 to 15, are said to have been groomed with gifts of alcohol, food and money by men whose aim was to use them for sex before sharing them with their friends and relatives.

On the second day of the trial, a jury at Liverpool Crown Court watched filmed police interviews from 2008 in which the 15-year-old described seven occasions when the 59-year-old forced her to have sex with him or other men. She said that she was first raped on a bare mattress in a room above a kebab shop after the man gave her a litre of vodka to make her “more relaxed”.

He allegedly then told the teenager that having sex with him was “part of the deal”, saying: “I bought you vodka. You have to give me something.”

The city has served as a refuge for people fleeing persecution, pestilence, and poverty. Recently its sizable immigrant influx has been largely of Muslim origin, and today when you gaze from one of Marseille's many beaches across the Mediterranean toward the unseen North African coast, you can almost imagine a human deluge on its way as the spreading unrest in the Arab world pushes more refugees and job seekers toward the shores of Europe.

If you listen to far-right politicians, you'll think this immigrant wave means, inevitably, an onslaught of Islamic puritanism that will challenge European ways and force every woman to dress like a Taliban bride. But then you realize that many of the men and women jostling around you on the Marseille sand are from African and Arab backgrounds, and that the young women are wearing bikinis, not burkas. Thanks to a remarkably efficient public transport system, you can get to Marseille's beaches from any part of town in less than 45 minutes.

And so for several months of the year, rich and poor, white and black, African and Arab, Muslim, Christian, and Jew, all find their own space on the sand, strip off most of their clothes, and settle down to socialize—and be socialized— under the Provençal sun. Ask them where they're from and you won't hear Algeria or Morocco, the Comoros islands or even France. Almost always they'll simply say, Marseille.

As more European countries become nations of immigrants, Marseille may be a vision of the future, even a model of multiculturalism.

The city center "is a district with a very numerous North African population," says Gaudin. At the heart of Marseille, on the plaza at Porte d'Aix, casbah merchants sell voluminous djellabas and Islamic veils, tea shops serve honeydripping sweets, and travel agencies specialize in pilgrimages to Mecca. The whole neighborhood is a hive of immigrants trying to find space for their new lives and old culture, even as both evolve into something different. One of the city's oldest mosques, El Takwa, is here; in the cafés, the older gentlemen sipping espressos wear the distinctive skullcaps of the Comoros islands; many women wear scarves over their heads, the hijab of conservative Muslims.

...During the Muslim holiday of Id al-Adha, the Feast of Sacrifice, I sat near the market on the Rue Longue des Capucins—which could be a street in Algiers or Tangier—having a glass of rosé (something I could not easily have done on that occasion in Cairo). I watched a bearded man carrying what I thought was a naked baby through the market. Then I realized it was a skinned lamb that was ready to be butchered. The annual slaughter of sheep during these Muslim high holy days has become a political issue as the government tries to confine the practice to official abattoirs on the edge of the city. But even there, those who resent the encroaching Muslim culture point to the torrents of blood as symbols of barbarism.

..."We French are being replaced by another people and their culture, religion, and way of life," says Stéphane Ravier of the far-right National Front. "The wave of immigration has been so huge in the last 20 years that we are being submerged."

"There are more than 70 mosques and prayer rooms in Marseille," says Mayor Gaudin, but clearly that's not adequate. The idea of building a grand mosque gained traction. "The population approved—by 60 percent. They understood that each religion ought to have a significant monument," says Gaudin. The cornerstone for the mosque was laid in May 2010. The rector of the main mosque in Paris came for the occasion. A Socialist Party politician proclaimed it would signify the "fraternal cohabitation of the communities." Construction was to be completed by 2013.

Three months later I asked a taxi driver to take me to the site, a complex of buildings that had once served as a municipal slaughterhouse. "I'm the one you ask to take you there?" asked the driver, who clearly didn't approve of the mosque. "The invasion has already begun," he said as we made our way through the streets up the hill.

...What worries some Marseillais is not the caricature of Talibanization invoked by right-wing extremists but what they see as the creeping Islamization of the city's largely working-class population—and not only those issus de l'immigration. "I think that Muslim culture is definitively taking over the lower levels of society," says Michèle Teboul, of CRIF. "There are many mixed marriages with Muslims."

"That's real integration," I say.

"That depends," says Teboul. "It depends if there is a mixture of the two cultures and not one culture gaining the upper hand over another," she says. In France, as she sees it, the institutionalization of secularism and the prevalence of political correctness have weakened the value systems in society and left people without any strong sense of tradition. "Loving your homeland, loving your country, having values— whether religious or other—has been put aside by the politically bien-pensant, and that has helped to break up families that no longer have points of reference, especially those that are underprivileged." Islam, says Teboul, offers a structure to the lives of many people who feel they are adrift. "I'm convinced of that," she says.

...Farouk Youssoufa, the youth counselor who works with immigrants in north Marseille, sees the lure of crime up close every day. "There's drug selling," he says, as we watch dozens of girls and boys practice a hip-hop dance for a celebration of Marseille's diversity. "Five or six years ago there were a lot of car thefts. These days there are a lot of holdups. That's become the fashion." Youssoufa's wife is one of the instructors at the youth center. I ask if she has ever thought of wearing a hijab. "I hope so," she says, surprising me at first. "But when I get older," she adds. "How much older?" I ask. Maybe when she is 40, she says, obviously thinking that future is very far away.

What will Marseille be like by then? It may well be the first western European city with a majority of its residents from Muslim backgrounds. Many other cities will have as many as Marseille does today, and most will have their own uneasy experiments with integration. But it's hard to imagine that on the Mediterranean coast here the beaches will be any less crowded or that the people on them will identify themselves as anything more, or less, than from Marseille.

This week other politicians have attacked Marine Le Pen's claim that all slaughter done in the greater Paris (Ile-de-France) region was 100% halal.

On a visit to Paris' main meat market on Tuesday morning, President Sarkozy rejected the claims of far-right Front National leader Marine Le Pen that all meat consumed in the Ile-de-France region is halal, without consumers being aware.

...President Sarkozy made an unscheduled early morning visit to the Rungis food market outside Paris on Tuesday morning where he said Le Pen's claims were "groundless."

"We eat 200,000 tonnes of meat every year in the Ile-de-France and only 2.5 percent is halal," he said.

The agriculture minister also criticised Le Pen's remarks, describing them as "false."

However, Le Pen's claim has now been confirmed by the region's Chamber of Agriculture.

The Chamber of Agriculture of the Ile-de-France confirmed today in a statement that 100% of the meat slaughtered in the Ile-de-France was in accordance with Muslim and Jewish traditions.

"No choice is given to the breeders" who have to go into the provinces to have their animals slaughtered," regrets the Chamber of Agriculture, which brings together professionals from the region's agricultural sector. The animals must travel "hundreds of kilometres", the carcasses being repatriated for conditioning and distribution in the Ile-de-France, emphasises the organisation which denounces the "loss of time and money".

Previously, the slaughterhouses in the region were managed by the local authorities but "the disengagement of the local councils has seen slaughter in the Ile-de-France handed over to private operators bit by bit", explains the Chamber. For "reasons of simplifying the process and motivated by the reduction of costs", these operators have favoured a "process of uniform ritual slaughter", regrets again the Chamber of Agriculture which points the finger at "the culpable consent of state agencies".

However the abattoirs in the Ile-de-France represent less then 2% of the meat consumption in the Ile-de-France, declare the professionals. The latter also regret the lack of information available to consumers. "In France it is estimated that 30% of the meat is slaughtered according to the Muslim and Jewish rites while their demand represents only 7%; 23% is thus marketed as "traditional" meat, again according to professionals.

(MENAFN - Arab News) A senior Kosovan diplomat has sought the support of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) for recognition of its independence and to boost its diplomatic stature in global organizations.

The call was made by Rexhep Boja, charge d'affaires of the Kosovo Embassy, during a reception in Riyadh Saturday night to celebrate the fourth anniversary of the country's independence."Five GCC states, including Saudi Arabia, have recognized our independence," said Boja, adding that Kosovo is still waiting for Oman to recognize it.

The reception was attended by a number of top Saudi officials and diplomats, including Alauddin Al-Askary, deputy foreign minister for protocol affairs.

Boja said the Kingdom became the 58th UN member state to recognize Kosovo three years ago."Kuwait was the most recent among the five GCC members to recognize us," he added.Boja said Kosovo is celebrating the fourth anniversary of its independence from Serbia with an ambitious plan to march ahead.

Saudi Arabia recognizes the Kosovar passports, which enable the citizens of the country to freely travel to theKingdom.

He pointed out that all citizens of Kosovo who now want to travel to the Gulf states can now use Kosovar passports. This is in addition to 35 percent of the OIC countries. "The recognition of the passports is a great achievement for Kosovo because we are convinced that the official recognition of the Republic of Kosovo is coming soon," added Boja.

Kosovo President Atifete Jahjaga visited the UAE last month to attend an energy summit. She used the occasion to meet senior UN and GCC officials and seek their support for diplomatic recognition.

Boja said 88 UN member states have recognized Kosovo so far. The last OIC member state to recognize Kosovo is Uganda and Haiti recognized it on Feb. 10.

Boja said non-recognition has been hampering free movement of Kosovars in OIC countries."Although the long-sought goal of diplomatic recognition of Kosovo's sovereignty is being achieved slowly and consistently, Pristina has failed to garner substantial support from the OIC," said Boja. He said the country was still not a member of the OIC because of the cumbersome eligibility criteria for membership. He said OIC membership rules stipulate that any nation wishing to join must be a member of the UN first before applying.

Yesterday I posted about how the French state was weaving pro-immigration propaganda into almost all strands of the schools curriculum. In Spain it's even more surreal: they're putting the propaganda into the bread!

In Llerida, a Catalan city that is one of the most Muslim-colonised parts of Spain (this is where the dog poisoning occurred and where churches were threatened with fines because their bell-ringing disturbed immigrants), when you buy a loaf of bread, it will come in a paper bag that contains "information" about immigration, "refuting in this way the prejudices and clichés which circulate as if they were truths".

The initiative enjoys the support of the Asociación Catalana para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo (ACDC) [Catalan Cooperation and Development Association], the Gremio de Panaderos [Baker's Association], the town council of Lérida and the Generalitat de Cataluña [Parliament of Catalonia] and is a new format for the various "anti-rumour" projects that have been developing in various Spanish cities.

The bags will contain figures that "counter the false beliefs about our foreign neighbours, such as that immigrants take up all the school meal assistance or that they are responsible for the collapse of health."

As well as baker shops, the diversity propaganda will also be dispensed via stickers, posters and book stalls. Future messages will "refute the prejudices that immigrants do not have to fulfil the same requirements when they open shops and the idea that 'we are being invaded'."

It seems other Catalan cities, such as Barcelona, have been doing this for some time.

In November 2010, when the Barcelona City Council unveiled its long-term strategy to improve coexistence among local and new immigrants, it launched a clever public service campaign to dispel rumours, misconceptions and the prejudices that many local people held about minorities and immigrants.

Among the city’s weapons? They recruited and trained ‘anti-rumour agents’ to dispel myths and spread the campaign through local organizations and the city’s neighbourhoods. Their mission? To contradict uninformed ideas about immigrants and combat discrimination. How? To take action as needed while traveling though the ordinary business of daily life.

Barcelona City Council has a website devoted to "rumour control". It contains resources and guides for "anti-rumour officers" who are also given special training courses. The resources include comics and videos. One of the latter is shown above. I don't understand Catalan but I get the impression he is asking for something truly Catalan in the baker's shop then the baker tells him "Oh, you can't have that, it's Austrian, oh that's from Switzerland, etc." It seems "rumours" about immigration are foremost among those that need to be "controlled".

Just when you think you've reached the limit of craziness, the the barrier is raised yet again. The parallels between modern Europe and the Soviet Union become eerier and eerier.

The French government document "National plan of action against racism and antisemitism 2012-2014" is quite shameless in acknowledging that education will be used as an instrument of indoctrination to inculcate politically approved views on race, religion, immigration and human rights.

...National school curricula contain, at all education levels, teaching designed to lead to an understanding of diversity and the richness of the cultures represented in France.

All the standard motifs used to instil guilt into European children about their own culture and history are in there: genocides (focusing on the Holocaust), and the African slave trade (although not the Muslim part in it you can be sure). While the history of genocide is taught, the Armenian genocide, the genocide that gave rise to the name, appears to have been thoughtfully omitted lest it offend Muslims. (UPDATE: Actually, I was wrong about this. Re-reading the document, I see there is a mention of the Armenian Genocide.)

There is also the historically-unjustified focus on non-European civilisations such as Han China, classical India and a "sub-Saharan African civilisation and its artistic production". The fact that almost no one, even people well-versed in history, could even name a single sub-Saharan African civilisation proves their utter historical insignificance. Yet European children must be taught about them for political reasons.

A favourable view of immigration must be instilled into the children.

In secondary school, the new history programmes for classes in the fourth year propose that pupils reflect on the evolution of immigration in France in the 20th century, which allows them to understand that the contribution of the foreign populations constituted an opportunity for France.

It seems religion has been reintroduced into the curriculum since 2002, not in a class of its own but integrated into other subjects such as history. Bizarrely, Islam is the ONLY religion taught at primary school level. The other monotheisms are taught at secondary level.

Pupils are also to be brainwashed till they properly appreciate the importance of human rights. This document is among the clearest items of evidence yet of how governments are now turning education into political propaganda. The propaganda is pervasive. If it was confined to just a Civics class, it would be bad enough. But it pervades all elements of the curriculum. The topics chosen for study in the History, Literature, even Art classes (studying African art!) are designed to interweave with the ideological agenda.

This plan is actually a complete blueprint for the promotion of the state's favoured "Diversity Macht Frei" ideology. Propaganda through the educational system is only one part of it. It also explains how television and cinema will be used to promote favourable views of diversity; it lists the "anti-racist" propaganda organisations that will be receiving government subsidies; and the new laws that will be introduced to suppress dissent.

If you can read French and you're looking for an example of how modern European states have been Sovietised, you cannot find a better single illustration of it than this document.

When corrupt German president Wulff resigned, I thought they would probably find someone even worse to replace him. Since Wulff had led the witch hunt against truth-teller Thilo Sarrazin, worse than him would have meant very bad indeed. I even worried that, in a fit of multicult frenzy, they might give the job to an actual Muslim. Since the German president is not elected directly by the people, but by delegates from the federal and regional parliaments, this nightmare scenario was far from unfeasible. Even if this horrific possibility was excluded, it was always likely that the new candidate would be a hardcore leftie given that Wulff was nominally a right-winger and there was a general desire for consensus because of the circumstances surrounding his departure.

That's how it turned out. There is now a virtual consensus around Joachim Gauck, so it is virtually certain he will be the next German president. He was the Socialist/Green candidate the last time around, coming second to Wulff. So he must be pretty bad then, you would think? Strangely, no. Gauck doesn't seem to be quite the typical green leftie. Even the Counterjihad PI blog has said he could have been PI's choice for the role.

While Wulff denounced Sarrazin and tried to drum him out of his job as a federal banker, Gauck spoke out in defence of the beleaguered author.

The former Berlin finance senator and author of the controversial book "Deutschland schafft sich ab" [Germany is Unmaking Itself], Thilo Sarrazin, had "demonstrated courage", affirmed. "He has discussed a problem that exists in society more openly than the politicians have." The political class could learn from the success of Sarrazin's book that "their politically correct language generates the feeling in the people that real problems are being hidden."

Mohammedans have been attacking more churches in France. Above you can see graffiti sprayed on a church wall in Escaudain. It says "Fuck France", "Fuck FN" [Front National], "Sarko we fuck you", "Death to the Pigs", "Morocco Power!" The AFP reported this incident, mentioning only the anti-Sarko and anti-FN tags, completely leaving out the anti-French and pro-Moroccan messages.

Another church in Épiais, dating from the 16th century, was robbed and then burned. The perpetrators were also responsible for a series of recent burglaries in the area. They have been arrested but no details about their identity have been released. So we don't know definitively that these were Muslims but I find hard to believe otherwise.

This really is the most breathtaking example of BBC bias on the topic of immigration. The story here is that one quarter of all crime in London is committed by immigrants. But the BBC spins this to make it look as insignificant as possible.

First, it mocks the British people by saying they "dominate" crime, displaying a Union Jack as if we had won a medal at some championship. Their meaning, of course, is that a majority of those convicted of crime are British. What an astonishing revelation: British people commit most crime in their own country! Even that claim would be invalidated if we used a deeper definition of Britishness than mere UK citizenship.

Then the BBC claims that immigrants make up "almost half the workforce" in London. It's interesting that the BBC chooses to refer to the "workforce" rather than the more obvious metric of the number of residents who are immigrants. Why would it do this? Because the immigrant share of the workforce is higher than the immigrant share of the general population so it makes the criminal statistics look better.

Also the BBC's numbers on immigrants in London are questionable.

According to the most recent estimates, 32 per cent of London’s residents and nearly 36 per cent of its workforce were born outside the UK. At the last census in 2001, 27 per cent of Londoners were born abroad.

Any population has its share of the criminally-inclined. It is for the government to deal with them if they are born in the country. But any rational immigration policy would be highly selective, screening out those with negative characteristics such as criminal records and favouring those with positive characteristics such as high education levels that also correlate with low levels of criminal activity. Obviously this is not happening.

Also note that the BBC says of immigration from Eastern Europe that it is "beneficial". Is it really for an organisation with a statutory impartiality obligation to tell us that Eastern European immigration is "beneficial"?

The only truth in this segment comes from the Polish criminal immigrant:

"English prisons are like a spa."

See the very different way in which the Daily Mail presents exactly the same story here.

A documentary was aired on French television featuring the claim that all slaughter performed in the greater Paris region was halal. You can watch the documentary above. (in French)

...also for the last four years, the slaughterhouse in Meaux has been practising ritual slaughter exclusively, whether the cows are intended for the religion market or not.

People don't expect to have halal meat in a traditional butcher's shop. It's true we hide it from them a little, but we've got no choice. We have to lie a bit to our customers ... All the butchers are in the same position as me.

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen switched her presidential campaign back to immigration Sunday, saying all meat in Paris was halal, as she tries to head off President Nicolas Sarkozy's attempts to lure her supporters.

At a weekend congress of her National Front party in the northern city of Lille, Le Pen returned to familiar anti-immigration territory, saying she had proof that all meat in Paris was halal and that she would lodge legal complaints against distributors for misleading consumers.

"This situation is a real deception and the government has been fully aware of this situation for months," Le Pen told reporters on the sidelines of the conference. "All the abattoirs in the Paris region sell halal meat without exception."

The main meat industry association, Interbev, denied the allegation saying the vast majority of the meat in Paris is not slaughtered under halal or kosher practices.

"While some halal and kosher meat does find its way into other distribution channels that doesn't affect the quality of the product in any way," the association's president Dominique Langlois told France Info radio.

Le Pen is third in opinion polls behind Socialist candidate Francois Hollande and Sarkozy. The first round of the presidential election is on April 22.

The Council of Europe has revealed that sex-selective abortion is widely practiced in Albania and the result is a growing gulf between the numbers of boys and the number of girls. Recent statistics show that for every 100 Albanian girls 112 boys are born. In natural demographic growth, the number of girls usually slightly exceeds the number of boys.

The Council of Europe warns that sex-selection, once associated mainly with Asian countries, has become popular in Europe, particularly in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia.

“Traditionally Albanian families have favoured boys over girls for two main reasons: the inheritance of the family name and the prospect of boys growing up to become breadwinners,” a 2005 report by the UN Development Programme (UNDP) said.

Abortion in Albania was legalized in 1995 after the fall of the communist government. It is now available on demand up to the 12th week of pregnancy.

The European news service Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso quotes Rubena Moisiu, the chief physician at the Kico Gliozheni abortion facility in Tirana, “There are no accurate statistics, but based on our surveys made in the largest gynaecological clinic in the country, in 2010 alone there were 470 abortions, the main causes of which were economic reasons, deformities and the sex of the foetus.”

Far-right groups in Athens have been patrolling certain neighbourhoods and beating up immigrants they accuse of taking work away from Greeks. Police have so far been reluctant to pursue the attackers.

By Gaëlle LE ROUX (text)

Reza Jholam is a 16-year-old from Afghanistan living in Athens. In October, he was walking home alone when he had the misfortune of crossing paths with a far-right group called “Chryssi Avyi” (“Golden Dawn”) terrorising certain neighbourhoods in the Greek capital. Their target: immigrants.

“There were twelve of them. First, someone threw a bottle of water at my back, so I started running. But I couldn’t get away,” Reza said. “They grabbed me and hit me in the head with a bat. When I was on the ground, they continued to hit me until I was no longer moving.”

Reza arrived in Greece last summer after passing through Iran and Turkey. Once in Athens, he was helped by the Afghan Community of Greece, an association that offers immigrants Greek classes and workshops on Greek culture, laws, and customs.

Now, the organisation also informs new arrivals of the risk of racist attacks. “We give them a map of neighbourhoods in Athens where it’s best to avoid walking alone,” explained the association’s president, Yunus Mohammadi.

‘Stealing work from Greeks’

Yunus, too, has had run-ins with far-right groups in Greece. A year ago, several men broke into his office, ransacked it and beat him. “Nothing too serious,” he said, touching his forehead. Last December, the vice president of the Afghan Community of Greece, Safar Haydary, was also beaten by extremists.

“This type of violence has become a very common phenomenon here, especially since the beginning of the crisis,” Yunus said. “Some people accuse us of taking jobs from Greeks and hold us responsible for the security problems here.”

Yet another attack on February 16 hospitalised three Bangladeshi immigrants.

“It’s getting worse and worse,” Yunus said. “The most worrying is that it’s spreading throughout the whole city and even around the country. A few days ago, there was a report of a similar attack on one of the Greek islands.”

Eva Cossé, a reasearcher at Human Rights Watch, condemns the recent pattern of abuse of immigrants in Greece.

“These attacks mainly target people of colour; few of the victims have been immigrants from Eastern Europe,” Ms Cossé explained. “It’s an extremely upsetting phenomenon, especially since the authorities are hesitant to admit there’s a problem."

Indeed, the police seem to be in no rush to arrest the assailants. In the police station near the neighbourhood of Omonia, where many of the immigrants live and many of the attacks have occurred, officers have said they are afraid that the far-right groups will retaliate if pursued.

56,000 immigrants per year

Until recently, community organisations had managed to protect immigrants from right-wing groups.

“People here are angry, they want to fight against these fascists,” Yunus said. “But we need to avoid that, because it’s exactly what those who attack us want. That’s exactly what they’re waiting for to step up the violence.”

The situation is so tense that it seems on the verge of exploding at any moment. In a report on the recent attack on immigrants, Ms Cossé warns that "police and lawyers will very soon have to do more than just record testimonies from victims" and that "aggressors will only stop when the police react in a swift and efficient manner and carry out serious investigations.”

“The problem is not only the lack of action on the part of Greek authorities. It’s much bigger,” Yunus noted. “It’s a problem of how immigrants are received in Europe.”

According to Human Rights Watch, 56,000 immigrants arrive each year in Greece. The country is the main entry point by land for illegal immigrants in Europe, where, via the Greece-Turkey border, nine out of ten illegal immigrants enter the European Union, according to the UN.

The dream of leaving Greece

“Apart from these abominable and overpopulated centres [which were severely criticised in a UN report from October 2011], nothing is done to welcome the immigrants, to explain to them how the country works,” Yunus said. “So we take care of them, on our modest scale.”

When Reza went to the police station, his face bloodied, he was told that nothing could be done because his visa had expired four days earlier. Nevertheless, an ambulance was called, although the doctors at the hospital did not clean or bandage his wounds.

Reza had only been in Greece for three months.

Today, Reza has recovered, with only a few scars on his forehead. But he dreams of one thing only: leaving Greece as soon as possible.

“I want to go to Norway, but the trip is expensive," he said. "You have to pay the border escort and other people. I’m waiting to save up enough money.”

German children in Bavaria are being forced to study Islam and even learn Turkish in their religion class. The photograph shows some of the teaching materials used. One sheet reproduces an Islamic prayer in German:

"I believe in Allah, His angels, His books, His messengers, in the Day of Judgment, and that Fate good and bad is given by Allah, and the life after death."

Another urges the children to learn Turkish so they can create a good atmosphere when they meet children of Turkish descent living in Germany.

Building language bridges

Although Arabic is the most important language for Islam, most Muslims in Germany speak Turkish. When you meet Turkish young people, by using a few phrases in their language you can contribute to a good atmosphere and mutual understanding.

It then gives German and Turkish versions of a few common phrases such as "Hello", "Goodbye", "How are you?" and the Islamic greeting "Peace be upon you", normally only used by Muslims to other Muslims.

Other texts urge the children to find out where their local mosque is and go there to have a look around.

This is the guy who led the witch-hunt against Thilo Sarrazin; the who proclaimed that "Islam is part of Germany"; the guy who delivered his Christmas message standing next to a veil-wearing Muslim.

Even in his parting speech, he couldn't stop playing the multicult game.

Federal Council President Horst Seehofer will take over representative functions. Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel will speak at the so important memorial event for the victims of far-right violence next Thursday.

Many of those who have participated in the European Genocide have later been shown to have been corrupt and on the take. It should come as no surprise. Beneath the veneer of spurious decency, these people are hardened hypocrites and criminals, willing to consign their own peoples to oblivion in return for a life of comfort and privilege.

However, it's bizarre that people become indignant at them for taking bribes and backhanders and not for committing genocide. It's like being upset at Hermann Göring because he stole paintings.

The from an interview with negro rapper Abd al Malik, who calls himself a poet and has a book coming out called "The Last Frenchman".

Would you define yourself as a patriot?Totally. For me, there are two notions that are opposed to one another. Nationalism, it's a pestilential thing, it's fear, folding in on oneself, the France of Christian culture, white France, a phantasm of the past that no longer exists. Patriotism, it's something beyond the colour of the skin or religion. Something that takes us towards life, that speaks of diversity as a richness.

The totalitarian pretensions of the EU rise increasingly to the surface. From denouncing the democratically-elected government of Hungary, they have now moved on to denouncing the campaigning of a political party. Where did these people ever get the idea that it was their role to comment on the goings-on in individual EU countries? Note that the PVV website is just a private initiative, not a policy of the government. But EU Commissars now feel at liberty to publicly denounce the actions of democratic politicians as they strive to represent their people.

It would be very easy to slide into the mentality that sees this type of intervention as normal. But sink into that mindset, we're lost. We need to constantly remind ourselves of some simple truths.

It is not normal, and it is not moral, for unelected bureaucrats to tell elected politicians what they should do.

It is not normal, and it is not moral, for government to tell their people what they should think.

It is not normal, and it is not moral, for criminal sanctions to be applied to the expression of unapproved words.

Two teenage girls ‘taken to flat and raped by gang who thought they could do as they pleased’

Two teenage girls were lured from their home town to a dingy Birmingham flat where they were subjected to a degrading weekend of sexual attacks by a group of men who “believed they could do with them as they pleased”, a court was told yesterday.

The girls, aged 15 and 16, were driven from Telford, Shropshire, to the flat by two men who used them for sex before “offering them up to their friends”.

The men said that they were part of a violent gang and “used their strength in numbers” to persuade the girls that “resistance or escape was hopeless”.

Alex Chalk, prosecuting, told a jury at Birmingham Crown Court that the six men in the dock had “not a shred of respect” for their victims, who were targeted because they had “rough edges” and came from difficult backgrounds. “These men made an assessment . . . that if they ever did complain, their backgrounds and demeanour meant they would attract little sympathy,” he said.

What ensued was a weekend of “sustained degradation and humiliation” during which the teenagers, at times sobbing and begging to be left alone, effectively became the sexual toys of their assailants. Shamrez Rashid, 20, Amar Hussain, 21, Jahbar Rafiq, 28, Adil Saleem, 21, Aqueel Rahman, 20, and Amer Islam Choudhrey, 20, each deny child abduction in relation to the 15-year-old girl, who was reported missing by her mother.

A play depicting a fictional meeting between Norwegian gunman Anders Behring Breivik and Dutch anti-Islam far-right leader Geert Wilders is to be staged in Amsterdam next month, organisers said Tuesday.

"Behring Breivik asks Wilders the big question: 'How far are you willing to go for your ideas?'" Willemsen said of the play, which will premiere on March 22 and run twice on March 25.

In the work by Dutch playwright Theodor Holman, Wilders and Behring Breivik have a chance encounter at Heathrow airport after the British screening of Wilders' real-life anti-Islam film "Fitna" ("Discord" in Arabic).

Released in 2008, "Fitna" showed shocking images of 9/11 and other terror attacks on Western targets interspersed with verses from the Koran.

The movie caused widespread outrage in Muslim countries, as well as opposition from the Dutch government, which feared it might spark a militant response similar to that which followed the publication in Denmark of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed.

On July 22, Behring Breivik, who has claimed to be on a crusade against multi-culturalism and the "Muslim invasion" of Europe, set off a car bomb outside government buildings in Oslo, killing eight people.

He then went to Utoeya island, some 40 kilometres (25 miles) northwest of Oslo, and, dressed as a police officer, spent more than an hour methodically shooting and killing another 69 people, mainly teens attending a summer camp hosted by the ruling Labour Party's youth wing.

Wilders strongly condemned Behring Breivik's attacks and said he was disgusted by the Norwegian's mention of him in his 1,500-page manifesto that circulated on the Internet shortly beforehand.

The Dutch politician's Freedom Party has 24 seats in the 150-seat parliament, where it lends its support to the coalition government of Dutch Premier Mark Rutte.

A theatre in Copenhagen sparked controversy in January by announcing it would produce a monologue based on Behring Breivik's manifesto.

Fdesouche.com is probably the best anti-Islam, anti-European Genocide blog in Europe. Although it focuses on France, it also covers similar stories from elsewhere on the continent. Many of the stories I post on this blog originate there.

In France, the website has become so popular that it has begun to have a marked effect on French politics. Marine Le Pen professed herself a fan. Multicultists, Muslims and the elite apologists for genocide who dominate Establishment culture in France as they do elsewhere in Europe, revile and regularly denounce this website.

They know that the simple collation of relevant materials has proved to be extraordinary powerful in undermining their worldview. It should come as no surprise, then, that Fdesouche.com is now under legal attack. A former Front National candidate, Pierre Sautarel, is accused of being the person behind the website, although he claims it is actually owned by someone in India. He has made this statement:

My name is Pierre Sautarel. I am 31. Since September, because I am accused of being the person legally responsible for Fdesouche.com, I have been subjected to what it is not excessive to call police and judicial hounding.

Because they don't have much to reproach me with, a judicial police officer has been been appointed to bring together all the complaints filed against Fdesouche.com regarding controversial comments and blame me for them.

But also to investigate my private life, my capital, my bank accounts, my relations with professional colleagues and friends. I am constantly summoned by the police. My acquaintances have also been interrogated.

The provisional conclusion of all that is that I am being investigated because of a complaint made by the direction of the association France Terre d’Asile [Asylum seeker "charity"]. And that I probably will be again next month for another complaint filed by Arezki Dahmani. I have been questioned in relation to lots of other complaints which might earn me some more investigations in the next few weeks.

Anyone who opposes the genocide of the European people faces state persecution. This is yet another example of it. What's particularly significant about this case, though, is that fdesouche.com is being persecuted over comments, not authored material posted on the site. In fact, there is almost no original material on the site. It just aggregates snippets of articles and videos from elsewhere then lets other people comment on them. This is obviously a strategy designed to survive in a hostile judicial environment, ringed round with "hate speech" laws. But even that has not been enough. Even if you post no original material, they will still get you for your comments.

Part of the Muslim infiltration strategy for Europe is to pretend that the healthy immune reactions against Islam (called Islamophobia) are actually part of some broader, malignant trend.

For example, Muslim leaders like to make common cause with Jews against right-wing extremism. We saw this in Scotland last week when representatives of Scottish Jewish communities signed up to a petition organised by the Muslim Humza Yousaf (who associates with "Hamas terror commander" Mohammed Sawalha) calling for a proposed Scottish Defence League march to be banned. (Eventually, the SDL agreed to conduct only a static demonstration instead.)

Muslims also like to pretend that part of the immune reaction comes from "militant secularists" opposed to all religion.

In an historic visit to the Vatican, Baroness Warsi will express her “fear” about the marginalisation of religion throughout Britain and Europe, saying that faith needs “a seat at the table in public life”.

There is a smidgeon of truth in this. The stigmatisation of direct criticism of Islam has been so successful that many of those who would like to say something negative about it will instead couch their remarks in general terms so as to be "non-discriminating".

But only the most clueless of Christians would sign up to the Muslim bandwagon attempting to re-insert overt religiosity as a dominating feature of public life. It should come as no great surprise that Cristina Odone finds herself among this clueless few.

Finally, it's worthy of note that Baroness Punjab has decided to send her offspring to a Christian school. No doubt we're supposed to be grateful for that.

There are several astounding things about this video. The first is that the African thinks EU taxpayers should pay for Africans to be educated here. The second is that the EU spokesman agrees. The third is that he goes even further than this and boasts of how EU taxpayers also pay for Africans to be educated in Africa.

Here is some info about the Erasmus for All program he talks about at the end.

Erasmus for All will be open to all EU Member States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland, EU candidate countries benefiting from a pre-accession strategy and other countries in the Western Balkans.

In addition, non-EU, mostly neighbourhood countries, will be able to benefit from actions aimed at promoting study and training opportunities abroad, as well as youth activities.

JEDDAH,19 Rabi al-Awwal/12 Feb (IINA)-The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) will convene a media workshop, the first of its kind, in Brussels, Belgium, on 15 and 16 February 2012 to develop media-related mechanisms to address the smear campaigns of Islam in newspapers and media institutions in the West.

The media workshop on stereotypes of Islam and Muslims in the media, which will be attended by Muslim and non-Muslim leading civil society organizations, journalists, intellectuals, and academics, represents a quantum leap in media action as it discusses, beyond rhetoric, the practical steps to address the phenomenon of Islamophobia.

The workshop comes in implementation of the outcome of the Mecca OIC Extraordinary Summit of 2005, the OIC Ten-Year Program of Action and the various Islamic Conferences of Information Ministers (ICIM). It will discuss at length the reasons behind and the results of Western media offensive campaigns directed against the symbols and sanctities of Islam and Muslims, which still occur from time to time.

The workshop is of particular importance as it will be held only weeks before convening of the UN Human Rights Council meeting in Geneva next March, which will put Resolution 16/18 to vote for the second time after its unanimous endorsement in the previous session.

Worth noting that Resolution 16/18 aims to combat intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief. The resolution came as an outcome of bilateral talks between the OIC and a number of Western countries including the USA. The OIC and USA held two meetings in Istanbul and Washington on this issue in order to develop operational mechanisms to implement the resolution at the level of the United Nations.

The two-day long workshop will take the format of brainstorming sessions to develop mechanisms for cooperation with external partners and to develop an action plan to address the phenomenon of Islamophobia. The recommendations of the media workshop will be presented to the 9th Session of the Islamic Conference of Information Ministers (ICIM) which will be held in Libreville, Gabon, in April for endorsement and implementation.

This week has provided us with yet further evidence that there is no resistance to cultural Marxism left within mainstream politics. In Britain the nominally Conservative party threatened to impose quotas on business unless more women were promoted to top managerial positions.

Cameron said: "The drive for more women in business is not simply about equal opportunity, it's about effectiveness.

"It's about quality, not just equality. That's why one of the things we'll be discussing in Sweden is what other countries are doing to help women become entrepreneurs and take up leading positions in business.

"Women now make up nearly half the workforce across Europe and the majority of university degrees. But they are still not sufficiently represented at the senior boardroom level.

"The evidence is that there is a positive link between women in leadership and business performance, so if we fail to unlock the potential of women in the labour market, we're not only failing those individuals, we're failing our whole economy."

This is all part of the Diversity Macht Frei mantra that is driving the European genocide. The "business case for diversity" seems to be largely based on the work of the American researcher Cedric Herring. I'll make a more in-depth critique of this work in another post some time but it's worth noting in passing that even Herring acknowledged that "a corporate workforce's gender composition did not have a significant impact on a company's relative market share". So whatever the supposed evidence about diversity generally, there is no evidence that promoting more women to boardroom positions makes businesses more successful.

While Dave was in Stockholm learning about the "benefits of diversity", his Skills minister was preaching them in Britain.

Making sure that more people with disabilities or learning difficulties, and those from minorities, are able to benefit from apprenticeships is a priority for the Government, according to skills minister John Hayes.

At the launch of a government-backed marketing campaign to encourage more employers and young people to get involved in apprenticeships, Hayes said that he wanted to make sure everyone had the chance to "be their best" through access to apprenticeships.

He commented: "I want more disabled people, for example, to benefit from apprenticeships. I want more people with learning difficulties to be able to benefit from apprenticeships. I want more women to get involved in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) apprenticeships. I want us to have more penetration into the minorities who are, at the moment, under-represented."

The Telegraph reported yesterday that Cameron is planning to hold a "Racism in Football" summit following the witchunt against football players who allegedly insulted one another in unapproved terms on the pitch. It's OK if one player calls another bald/fat/stupid/talentless but if he should describe the other player as "black" (even if he actually is black", it apparently becomes a criminal offence and a grounds for depriving the player of his status or livelihood.

The Prime Minister and Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary, will stage a “round table discussion” at Number 10 with leading figures from footballing authorities - as well as “player representatives” - next week.

The move comes amid growing fears that incidents allegedly fuelled by racism are harming the image of the game in England in the run up to the London Olympic Games, which begin in July.

It's clear that there is indeed racism in football. People of European ancestry are being systematically discriminated against. How else to explain the disproportionate number of negroes on the teams? Unless, of course, Equality Campaigners want to claim that negroes are athletically superior to non-negroes. And if they make that claim, do they concede that if negroes are superior in athleticism, they may be inferior in some other sphere? If not, they are implicitly claiming that negroes are the master race: superior in one sphere but not inferior in any other.

We constantly hear from diversity advocates that minorities want to see parliaments/boardrooms/whatever that reflect the natural demographics of the country. Well, OK. But is it OK for Europeans then to want to have sports teams that reflect the demographics of their countries too? Sports teams, especially national sports teams, do, after all, have a symbolically representative function. Think of the French team in the last World Cup. I think I remember one white guy in it. The entire team was populated by African imports who felt not loyalty to France, as evidenced by their going on strike before a crucial game. Apparently these people, largely Muslims, had imposed halal-only food on the entire team, including the non-Muslims. Indeed, Patrice Evra, who has starred in the latest contrived racism controversy in English football, was part of that French team. It was disputes over these "diversity" issues that led to them going on strike. Europeans have the right to see sports teams that look like them. If we're going to have quotas, let's start with pro-European quotas in sport.

But back to the main point. What the Conservative antics this week demonstrate is that there is simply no resistance left in mainstream politics. Cultural Marxist ideas have colonised the minds of the middle-of-the-road right-wingers. That is why (democratic) salvation, if it comes, must come from the so-called far-right.

And the story is the same all across Europe. The mainstream right-wing parties have embraced the ideas of the left. In representative democracies, most voters can be taken for granted. The number of wavering voters who could go either way and who actually decide the outcome of elections is often tiny. Parties have realised that the secret to success in this rigged system is trying be as much like your opponents as possible.

I saw a comparison of Marine Le Pen's National Front's policies to those of the mainstream right-wing party in France in 1980. Point by point, they were almost identical. Similarly, most people would be amazed if they saw some of the things the Conservatives were doing and saying about immigration in the 70s. Voluntary repatriation was official policy (although never actually implemented). Now it's the preserve of the BNP.

The mainstream Conservative parties have all moved left, deserting their voters, creating the policy vacuum which the far-right is filling. Across Europe, the so-called far-right is marching in from the fringe to the mainstream. Eventually the far-right parties will displace the traditional conservative parties or they will merge, re-stiffening the spines of the old guard. This is a necessary process, but it could take a generation or more to complete. In the meantime, the Muslims and the multicultists are laughing all the way to the mosque.