Error With Calculator?

Tedor Gligorich

One can he access any older version of the calculator, if one do he wishes? How may?

I need one where you can put in different distances on a 50mm lens and get the pixlperface number (in feet ok). The old one could do it but this one makes my 1 to 0 when i try different distances far away. I was in the stuck in the middle showing someone not important, and it gave away, can i finish with old basic bones model?

Does anymember see that to with me?

I also heard greatest version got rolled-over the other yesterday, but can he just get one that is not way off in the distance, even if one sacrifile new fun features afterall?

^ on webinar John showed to type super fast digits you can get some in before zero hits you, he got all up to 94. still beats me!

Create New Topic

Tedor Gligorich

Ok, will give new vers. three Lucky Strike smokeout test. Thxs for pony marty, ill watch it very generally, and at any time!

Some other darn good news was that i worked around by good guessing, like this said you could do. 50mm lense looking 50m away must show exact side of ford ranger, (standard cab!) Now i just need to something to convert Rangers to Yugos. Hahaha. (5m it is really)

Create New Topic

Tedor Gligorich

My Luckies' running out. Want to say it working, but its hard to do yet but maybe your new one is just in US .? Can you see vers. stamped # on yours to know if u got lastest/latest one?? Johns ownone is doing pretty much better, so can you giveit try of 50mm and then with 5 meter distance, and see if that a going well on your'ses browser? Looking howe others do it. Horse vidi on repeating - good luck.

Create New Topic

Tedor Gligorich

So I am to look of a total dumbstumper then? Will make more movie, but tell on me your browser-maker and browser-version ( with the os2 ) so i can use your right choiced kind in rerun filming of self-me?

Create New Topic

Pete Warren

Cleared browser cache and reloaded tool from new browser IE -11 session - still may have some issues when you change the Focal Length: (say from default 2mm to 20mm) and then change the Distancey: entry (usually by deleting the value in the field. When I change it sometimes displays an "Invalid Input!" value in the field. However, when I enter these values below they actually change on-the-fly as follows:

- type 5 it goes to 4

- type 6 it goes to 8

- type 3 it goes to 4.

However, once the first time sequence of numbers is entered, validated and displayed (i.e with the wrong value), the tool will then allow and accept whatever new value you enter on the next pass.

For what its worth, play with entering different combos in these fields and you'll see the varied results it returns - also was able to trigger the value displayed as "distance" in the same Distance: field.

Create New Topic

Tedor Gligorich

Now i know what may be little problem. I think that calcer is using wrong value for sensor size 1/1.27". Look like using 5.8 mm, should maybe 5.4?

to test screwy, start from scratch values, take account of width, should say 240 fts. Now change sensor to 1/2.7", it show 292.6, which could be true, cause sensor bigger so width get bigger. But then change to 1/2.5", width get smaller now, to 287.8. Something glitched up, or could this be right on? Maybe someone can have me verified too?

good news! I ask Svet, he say "probably one line of code, min". But you must remember, Svet is no programmer - and a bad one at that! So...

Create New Topic

Tedor Gligorich

Thx. I'm been using AOV from Axis data sheet direct into calc manual. This proposol is job site time laspe, from 55 meters away from building on 10 meter pole. Building better be 100 meter wide when done. So maybe ~100 degree horizontal with the varifical.

Question, Axis also only give horizontal AOV, but i need know vertical AOV, because they might want a little sky in picture, sunrising, sunsetting. For vertcle AOV, is just horizontal * 9/16?

Create New Topic

Undisclosed #3

I like the upload scenes feature a lot! I hadn't gotten a chance to use it yet, and now that I have I'm stumped about one thing:

Basically, I choose the Q1755 from the list and set the AOV to 48, its widest. Then I upload a scene taken the with the same model camera, when at 48.

But even after I center it, I still have substantial top and bottom letterboxing. This letterboxing begins to shrink when increasing the focal length, but because it is several degrees before the letterboxing totally disappears, the cameras FOV at its widest is displayed until the FOV fills up the window. I would think that changing the AOV always changes the FOV, but in this case it just makes the FOV more magnified without reducing the width of the FOV.

When uploading a scene taken at a certain AOV and then using a camera with the same AOV, should the scene fill the window perfectly?

Should I just adjust the AOV of the new scene to whatever it takes up the whole window?

Side note: 29MP resolution is not available in manual mode. You can, howover choose the Avigilon behemoth from the list and then go into manual mode and change the sensor to 35mm. Which I works I think...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.