Had anyone else besides the lefty-clown taken such a position, Chunky would have posted five or more tweets about it, all begging for attention like the ones he posted about Michigan’s L. Brooks Patterson today. BTW, L. Brooks has presided over the third-most successful county in the country, and has personally sponsored a slew of major initiatives attempting to resurrect the socialism-wrought horror that is the Detroit Metro area. Meanwhile, the citizens of the fair city of Detroit have elected the likes of Kwame Kilpatrick to multiple terms, even as his crimes light up the headlines of the local leftist news-rag. Blame Whitey, though. But steal the bandleader’s van, right, Chunky?

That’s just insane, Swamprat. Only an insane person would buy that bullshit. 😆

Yeah, it’s going back down below zero tonight, here in Michigan. NYC and the rest of the east coast is getting creamed with a snowstorm and Arctic-type temps. Some reporters will rebel against their overlords, and report the truth. Most will keep their damn traps shut, and wait for summer, where they can blame every heatwave on Evil Mankind.

I thought Obama was going to solve this. Didn’t he say he was going to heal the rise of the seas or something? Well, I’m waiting. It was supposed to start the day he got elected. I have yet to hear of his shortcoming in this field from the left or most true believers in global warming.

Suprisingly, the rightwing grants that global warming has, indeed, halted, but according to the 14 or 15 year timeline they offer, It would appear to be a “Bush” achievement.

Searcy is hilarious in his undermining of Hollywood Dogma, but this internet exposition is completely separate from his character on “Justified.” Fatass is parroting the dogmatic expulsion of all actors who refuse to conform to Traditional Hollywood Leftist Idiotology, as ordered to do by his superiors at Media Matters who issue the Waddling Orders. He’s so bereft of any kind of original thought, it’s gone beyond sad, and into the realm of tragic. 😦

How is it Mr. Charles-tweets-all-day-long suddenly, out of nowhere “encounters” Nick Searcy? Really? Mr. Searcy is well known to average non-tweeting folk like me. Does Chunky not understand Twitter? Discuss.

Harry’s been touring the country spouting racist nonsense. Most of the black students at UM are beneficiaries of an affirmative action program, part of the diversity-worshipping dogma at the university.

Black is getting piled on in the usual manner. Other blacks calling him a ‘house n****r’, ‘Uncle Tom’ and worse. The usual dims yammering about insensitive Republican Nazism, etc.
Not using a tu quoque logical fallacy here, but it is fascinating that the calls for Bush’s impeachment, war-crimes charges,assassination, etc. were daily bleats coming from the mouths of these same finger-pointers. Two standards, two different sets of rules.
And what does SCOAMF mean? Seen it but never deciphered it ..

Unless he’s GW Bush. Then you can say anything. You can even make a movie about assassinating him and pretending that the US turns into a Soviet police state under President Cheney. You know, like the one we have under President Obama. Which is good, by the way. Why, it’s real good he done that, ain’t it Ma???

Climate alarmist and Hockeystick inventor gets in hot water after more hot air
Michael Mann called a fellow scientist, but climate sceptic, “anti-Science” after her Congressional Testimony, but the tables have been turned on him in spectacular fashion

by Climate Realist on 21 January 2014 17:53

If anyone out there thought that scientists were a bunch of genteel, Queensbury rules respecting gentlemen-types they’ve obviously never seen climate alarmists and climate sceptics going at each other like their lives depended on it.

That’s not to draw a parallel and to declare each side as guilty as the other. The “consensus” scientists are almost always the ones playing the dirty tricks and calling the names. But when the other side fights back, it’s not just instructive about the state of the “consensus” itself, it’s downright entertaining.

Bring on Fred Singer, professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project writing in the American Thinker. He’s got it in for Michael Mann — or “Hide the decline” Mike, as he calls him — director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University, inventor of the so called “Hockeystick” and one of the most famous climate alarmists in the world.

What has got Singer all riled up is a recent piece written by Mann in the New York Times where he starts playing the victim about all the grief he’s got for the fact his theories have all turned out to be wrong, and an accusation he made against a fellow scientist’s testimony last week to Congress.

Let the fun begin. Before he gets going himself, Singer brings in Ross McKitrick, a well known scientist who long ago trashed the whole Hockeystick nonsense for what it was. Responding to Mann’s New York Times op-ed, which was entitled “If you see something, say something.”, McKitrick retorted:

“OK, I see a second-rate scientist carrying on like a jackass and making a public nuisance of himself.”

“I see an ideologue, desperately trying to support a hypothesis that’s been falsified by observations. While the majority of climate alarmists are trying to discover a physical reason that might just save the AGW hypothesis, Mann simply ignores the ‘inconvenient truth’ that the global climate has not warmed significantly for at least the past 15 years — while emissions of greenhouse gases have surged globally.”

“Since you have publicly accused my Congressional testimony of being ‘anti-science,’ I expect you to (publicly) document and rebut any statement in my testimony that is factually inaccurate or where my conclusions are not supported by the evidence that I provide.”

Surely Mann will Mann-up and respond to the challenge. After all, he wouldn’t be afraid of a serious debate with a serious opponent, now would he?

Michael Mann is a conman and has made bu ku millions on the global warming/climate change boondoggle. But Chunk is just a pinhead useful idiot who knows less about climate science than he does about what goes into those delicious crunchy cheesy things he shoves down his throat in fistfuls. Which is to say nearly nothing. And for that he deserves the offical Winter Storm Anus award: