To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

Title: Deforestation and the spread of invasive species
Authors: Andrea A. Gudiel1*, Shane Nieves2, Kim E. Reuter1, Brent J. Sewall1
1. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, 2. Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers,
FL, 33965
*Corresponding author: aagudiel@gmail.com
Abstract
Over ninety percent of Madagascar’s original forests have been deforested, and the population of
Madagascar has doubled in the past forty years, further exacerbating problems of local,
unsustainable forest use. While research on Madagascar's endemic species is common, less
information is known about its non-native species and the increasing effects they have on local
biodiversity as the forest becomes more degraded. This study aimed to fill this gap in knowledge.
We collected data on human forest use and the presence/absence of five non-native plant species:
Mangifera indica, (cultivated) Albizia lebbeck (cultivated), Mucuna pruriens (non-cultivated),
Lantana camara (non-cultivated), Tamarindus indica (origin unknown) in and around the
periphery of the Ankarana National Park, northern Madagascar. Data was collected
systematically along transects across three different forest types which ranged low to high human
disturbance. We found that the presence of historically cultivated non-native species positively
correlated with human disturbance. In contrast, historically non-cultivated species did not show
this correlation to human disturbance levels. Our results indicate that anthropogenic modification
of habitats could impacts the densities and spread of cultivated species. This study increases
understanding of the negative effects that humans have on densities of non-native species in
disturbed habitats, the effects of roads and human access points, and illustrates the importance of
natural history knowledge of non-native species regarding their anthropogenic cultivation
histories.

The author has granted Temple University a limited, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to reproduce his or her prize-winning paper, in whole or in part, in electronic or paper form and to make it available to the general public at no charge. The author retains all other rights.

The text presented here is in raw, un-copyedited form, as created through optical character recognition scanning of the originals. It is not always complete or accurate and should be used for preliminary research only.

ADA Note

For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact diglib@temple.edu .

For Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation, including help with reading this content, please contact diglib@temple.edu .

Document Content

Title: Deforestation and the spread of invasive species
Authors: Andrea A. Gudiel1*, Shane Nieves2, Kim E. Reuter1, Brent J. Sewall1
1. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, 2. Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers,
FL, 33965
*Corresponding author: aagudiel@gmail.com
Abstract
Over ninety percent of Madagascar’s original forests have been deforested, and the population of
Madagascar has doubled in the past forty years, further exacerbating problems of local,
unsustainable forest use. While research on Madagascar's endemic species is common, less
information is known about its non-native species and the increasing effects they have on local
biodiversity as the forest becomes more degraded. This study aimed to fill this gap in knowledge.
We collected data on human forest use and the presence/absence of five non-native plant species:
Mangifera indica, (cultivated) Albizia lebbeck (cultivated), Mucuna pruriens (non-cultivated),
Lantana camara (non-cultivated), Tamarindus indica (origin unknown) in and around the
periphery of the Ankarana National Park, northern Madagascar. Data was collected
systematically along transects across three different forest types which ranged low to high human
disturbance. We found that the presence of historically cultivated non-native species positively
correlated with human disturbance. In contrast, historically non-cultivated species did not show
this correlation to human disturbance levels. Our results indicate that anthropogenic modification
of habitats could impacts the densities and spread of cultivated species. This study increases
understanding of the negative effects that humans have on densities of non-native species in
disturbed habitats, the effects of roads and human access points, and illustrates the importance of
natural history knowledge of non-native species regarding their anthropogenic cultivation
histories.