Contents

Okay kids, I think we have plenty of characters at the moment. I suggest we focus more on the plotline with future edits, simple though it is to add bio-blurbs. --ЖKalirtotally not Wario at all 18:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Methinks I've made significant progress on this article by now. How does it look to you? Does it make me look fat? --ЖKalirtotally not Wario at all 16:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Humour:

10

I'm truly at a loss for words, as I was when I first saw the cartoon no more than a few months ago. The effort that must've been put into this just baffles me.

Concept:

9

Truly unique and bizarre, but that's sort of what I had anticipated. Don't expect everybody to know what this article it talking about though, which might be the only drawback of pushing to get it featured.

Prose and formatting:

10

Nothing seems to be wrong here.

Images:

10

Serve their purpose and what-not, but my only recommendation would be making them a bit bigger, especially the first one.

Miscellaneous:

10

Nice British overtone with a clever link to Mhaille's userpage on "umbrella-wielding gibberish speaking lunatic on a skateboard".

I don't wanna make another table, so I'm just gonna say that it's not as good as the first review and not as bad as the other two. Personally I liked it, but not everyone diggs the random/satire hidden in links humor. P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 01:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)