Hold Congress Accountable

Knowledge is power. It makes sure people understand what is happening to their country, and how they can make a difference. FreedomWorks University will give you the tools to understand economics, the workings of government, the history of the American legal system, and the most important debates facing our nation today. Enroll in FreedomWorks University today!

Resources

Blog

“America’s Promise” free community college scheme promises low academic standards, high national debt

In an attempt to circumvent Congress and move the free college agenda forward, The White House will launch a $100 million grant program for free community college tuition. The new program, America’s Promise Grants, was unveiled last week by Vice President Biden in a speech at the Community College of Philadelphia.

The America’s Promise Grants program offers $100 million in grants designed to create and expand “partnerships between community colleges and other training providers, employers, and the public workforce system to create more dynamic, tuition-free education and training programs for in-demand middle and high-skilled jobs across the country,” according to the White House.

These grants will be administered by the Department of Labor and funded by H1-B application fees. H1-B visas are given to skilled foreign workers, typically for STEM occupations.

According to a statement released by The White House, the costly grant program is the least expensive part of the community college mandate. The statement includes several additional budget proposals:

$75 million for technical job training programs.

Tax credit incentives for businesses that hire community college graduates full-time.

An additional $2 billion in Pell Grants for FY2015.

A $3 billion program designed to keep jobs in the U.S.

The new community college tuition grant program and its subsequent budget proposals are not only expensive, but also impractical.

The grants program is investing in a community college system with a declining education value. Obama’s program does little to address low graduation rates or poor academic standards. The average American college student reads at a 7th grade level; the reading level of a community college student would likely be even lower.

The community college graduation rate is continuing to decline; only 19.5% of students graduate within three years.

As for being a cost-efficient stepping-stone to a four-year institution, plans to transfer are often unsuccessful as only 15% of community college students earn a bachelor’s degree within six years.

Even if America’s Promise Grants did lead to higher graduation rates, adding an additional free two years of education to our ineffective K-12 system would only result in an ineffective K-14 system.

Unsurprisingly, remedial courses are common among community college students with 68% of students enrolling in at least one remedial course during a period of six years. 59% of community college students are referred to remedial math upon entrance.

The America’s Promise Grants Program is intended to produce graduates capable STEM workers. This is a lofty goal when most community college students are enrolled in remedial math.

The $100 million scheme doesn’t make much fiscal sense either. Almost exactly one year ago, the Obama Administration proposed America’s College Promise Act, a nationwide program for free community college tuition. Out of the $80 billion combined federal and state investment for America’s College Promise Act, only $32 billion would result in a degree or credential.

America’s Promise Grants would likely result in a similar outcome, especially considering the high student loan default rate. Community college students have the highest default rate, with 20.6% of students defaulting on their student loans within three years.

Community college isn’t very expensive; the average cost of community college tuition is only $3,300 per year. Therefore, the high default rate signifies a problem that is much larger than rising tuition costs.

The market has already indicated that community college produces a low return on investment. The free market can also determine the value of a degree. As Neil Seifring, Director of Strategic Initiatives at FreedomWorks, pointed out:

“The market should be deciding the value of higher education. It should not be dictated by a federal government that is over $18 trillion in debt and unable to manage its own finances, let alone that of a national free college tuition program.”

The America’s Promise Grants Program is just another instance of the government spending money we don’t have for programs we don’t need.

“And at the U.S. Department of Education, Common Core is dead.”
This is music to the ears of advocates for federalism, school choice, and, frankly, for student success everywhere. These words came directly from U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos last week at a conference in DC titled “Bush-Obama School Reform: Lessons Learned,” held by the free-enterprise think tank American Enterprise Institute.

Competition is the hallmark of our economy. It promotes freedom of choice, innovation, and will lead to better products and prices for consumers. Not only that, but it is a key driver of job growth for Americans.

A little more than a month ago, the White House and tax-writers in the House and Senate rolled out the Unified Framework for Fixing Our Broken Tax Code. The goal of the framework was to provide a sign to both members of Congress and the American people on the direction that the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee would take when they began work on this crucial effort.

FreedomWorks Foundation's Regulatory Action Center submitted comments to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last week supporting the agency's stay and review of unnecessary and burdensome methane emission regulations on the domestic oil and gas industry. FreedomWorks Foundation further calls upon EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt to investigate the process by which such laughably bad regulations were finalized and fire those responsible.

Over 250 years ago, courageous colonists took up arms and defended the right against unlawful search and seizure in the American Revolution. Fueled by outrageous searches by British law enforcement, our founding fathers enshrined within our constitution the Fourth Amendment, which reads, in part: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.”

FreedomWorks Foundation submitted, thus far, the only comment to an open Coast Guard docket requesting information on regulations to review and/or reverse, in accordance with President Trump's executive orders on regulatory reform.

Recently, the economic disparity of the urban-rural divide has garnered substantial attention, especially as it relates to Internet and technological expansion. Rural economies suffer from a lack of Internet connectivity relative to urban areas, with rural adults being 10 percent less likely to have broadband or smartphones than urban adults.

From a so-called “economic miracle” to a human rights disaster, Venezuela has followed in the footsteps of literally every single socialist or communist country ever with its country in complete collapse. Crime is on the rise, the people are starving, protests are going all throughout the country, and unconfirmed rumors are coming out that President Nicolas Maduro is considering leaving.

An issue that has a tendency to come into the public consciousness from time to time is bringing back Glass-Steagall. Initially repealed in 1999 by the Financial Services Modernization Act, primarily known as the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, the law that separated commercial and investment banking has received renewed support with both party platforms during last year’s presidential election calling for it to be reinstated.

Over the past several months, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has taken a step back on federal justice reform efforts, regressing to purportedly “tough on crime” stances. From advising increased penalties for nonviolent offenders to more recently promising an increase in the use of civil asset forfeiture by the federal government, Sessions has been doing everything in his power to give the Department of Justice (DOJ)’s full support to 80s-era policies from which many conservatives have abandoned in favor of evidenced-based practices that reduce recidivism and enhance public safety.