The state of Florida, in fact, owes its discovery in 1513 to an explorer, Juan Ponce de León, who was in search not of new land but of a fountain of youth. He was originally headed to the Bahamas to find the fabled spring.

Today, many people, young and old, share Ponce de León’s lamentations over aging, and new progress in longevity and anti-aging research faithfully attracts significant interest from scientists, the media, and the aging-concerned alike. One area of longevity research that has not disappointed in this respect is calorie restriction.

In the 1930s scientists discovered that a low-calorie diet could increase life span in certain organisms. In the decades since, the effects of calorie restriction have been described in animals such as mice and rats and in smaller organisms, including yeast, worms, and fruit flies. Scientists also have begun to investigate the effects of low-calorie diets in primates. But there remains a burning and as yet unanswered question: does calorie restriction increase life span in humans? The experiments conducted so far have indicated that this route to increased longevity is not universally effective.

In rodents, a low-calorie diet can lengthen lifespan by as much as 40 percent. This sounds too good to be true, and as far as human longevity is concerned, it is. The impressive increase was the result of cutting the caloric content of the mouse diet by 30–40 percent. In humans, cutting so many calories out of an otherwise healthy diet is excessive, and for people of healthy weight, it also is unnecessary. Furthermore, those people on low-calorie diets need to be sure that the diet contains the optimal quantities and balance of nutrients.

There are a number of variables that determine how effective a low-calorie diet will be in lengthening the life span of a given organism.

One obvious factor is obesity; calorie restriction is most effective in increasing the life spans of obese mice. Being excessively overweight drastically reduces longevity in the first place, so reducing calorie consumption really only has one direction to push life span.

The influence of body mass on longevity is further illustrated by a strain of naturally lean mice, known as DBA/2. Studies have shown that, in terms of life span, these mice benefit very little, if at all, from calorie restriction. However, a number of studies have shown that in animals of average weight and size, calorie restriction can cause changes in important determinants of longevity, including insulin and cholesterol levels. Decreases in the levels of these substances are associated with a lowered risk for conditions such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease and therefore tend to be linked to moderate gains in longevity.

Though it was originally believed that calorie restriction increased life span by slowing metabolic rate, research has indicated that this is unlikely to be true. In yeast and worms, for example, reduced calorie input is associated with an increase in respiratory rate. This presumably is the result of cells having to respond to reduced energy input by altering the regulation of genes and proteins. During calorie restriction, cells come to rely heavily on alternative metabolic pathways, such as the mobilization of stored fat for the release of energy from fatty acids. To activate these pathways and to turn on the appropriate sets of genes and proteins that regulate them, cells must expend energy.

This is of course sustainable only to a certain extent. Once calorie input drops below a particular threshold and fat stores are used up, an organism will turn to the metabolism of other tissues for energy, which in animals includes muscle. Such starvation will eventually lead to death if calorie intake is not restored to adequate levels.

It seems that for humans the greatest benefits of research into the physiological effects of calorie restriction will be in the realm of finding new treatments for diabetes and other metabolic diseases. Unfortunately, calorie restriction is far from Ponce de León’s ideal fountain of youth. Then again, water doesn’t have any calories.