Dedicated to the advancement of the State of Indiana by re-affirming our state's constitutional principles that: all people are created equal; no religious test shall be imposed on our public officials and offices of trust; and no special privileges or immunities shall be granted to any class of citizens which are not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
Advance Indiana, LLC. Copyright 2005-16. All rights reserved.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Several South Bend police officers are suing the city, its former police chief, communications director and an attorney following revelations earlier this year that the police department had been recording phone conversations that took place on private lines in the offices of higher-ranking police officers. Karen DePaepe, the city's former communications director, in attempting to record phone conversations of a division chief inadvertently recorded conversations on a phone in a police captain's office instead. Upon reviewing the content of some of those conversations she found offensive, DePaepe shared them with Chief Darryl Boykins. The police officers learned of the recorded conversations after Chief Boykins summoned one of them to his office and berated him for being a "back stabber" and referenced recorded phone conversations that he would use as a basis for firing of anyone he determined had been disloyal to him following his reappointment as chief by incoming Mayor Pete Buttigieg. DePaepe confirmed that she had tapped the officer's phone line when confronted with the accusations, which resulted in a firestorm that led Mayor Buttigieg to demote Boykins and fire DePaepe, both of whom have filed their own lawsuits against the city.

Buttigieg's administrations asked the U.S. Attorney's office to investigate the wiretapping of the phone lines. According to Buttigieg, he was told by the U.S. Attorney's office that unless he fired Boykins as police chief he would face criminal prosecution when the city's African-American community became outraged at Boykin's demotion. The U.S. Attorney's office subsequently claimed that it did not provide personnel advice to the city according to Boykins' attorney. No criminal charges were brought against anyone for violating federal wiretap laws. DePaepe and her attorney, Scott Duerring, gave several public interviews in which they accused the officers whose calls were recorded of making racially offensive comments about Boykins. The lawsuit claims that Boykins admitted to one of the plaintiffs that he had not heard him make racially offensive comments in the recorded phone conversations but said so "because his feelings had been hurt."

The lawsuit contends that the recording of the phone conversations violated their Fourth Amendment rights against illegal searches and seizures, as well as the federal wiretapping statute. It further alleges that the actions of the defendants support state tort claims for negligence, defamation, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiffs are seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the harm they say they have suffered. Attorneys for the plaintiffs held a press conference yesterday upon filing their lawsuit according to the South Bend Tribune.

Daniel Pfeifer said the officers, who remained
quiet for months, were vilified to the public. The tapes have been rumored to
contain comments from officers making racist comments against Boykins, who is
black, and possibly illegal comments.

The tapes have not been released to the
public.

“For several months the
plaintiffs have not said anything at the advice of their attorneys,” Pfeifer
said. “They have become villains when in fact they are the victims. They’ve been
the victims all along.”

The lawsuit
contends that it is well known that some of the lines in the department are
recorded, but that the officers believed individual lines, including their own,
were private.

The defendants' attorneys shot back that the lawsuit was frivolous and state they will file counter claims against the plaintiffs.

“I can say that we’re going to formally respond
through the appropriate channels through court, which may include seeking
sanctions for the bringing of frivolous litigation,” Dixon said
Wednesday.

Duerring also called the
complaint frivolous and added that he and DePaepe will be replying to it with a
counter claim against the plaintiffs for damages.

“The complaint is rife with factual inaccuracies and
falsehoods that any reasonable investigation would have uncovered,” he
said.

Buttigieg declined on
Wednesday to discuss the details of the pending litigation, but did release a
brief statement.

“These allegations
make it all the more important for us to concentrate on finding outstanding new
police leadership,” he said. “Our officers and citizens deserve leadership that
puts the focus where it belongs: Fighting crime and serving our diverse
community.”

SUPPORT ADVANCE INDIANA

It takes many hours of time to publish content for Advance Indiana. If you enjoy reading the content of this blog, please help out by contributing. You can click on the "Make A Donation" button below to support Advance Indiana by using PayPal. Thanks to all of those readers who have made contributions in the past and continue to support this blog with your contributions. If you would rather support the blog using an alternative source of payment or would like to advertise on this blog, e-mail me at gwelsh@indy.rr.com for more information.

Blogflux

Subscribe To

Comment Policy

Advance Indiana allows you to post comments via this blog subject to the guidelines set forth herein. You understand that any comments you post are your own and are not those of Advance Indiana. You further understand that Advance Indiana is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced in your comments. Unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive, or otherwise objectionable comments are not acceptable. If you think any content posted or otherwise included in Advance Indiana violates the guidelines set forth herein, then please alert Advance Indiana.
Advance Indiana reserves the right to pre-screen, edit, and remove any post as it deems appropriate. You specifically acknowledge that Advance Indiana has no obligation to display any post submitted or otherwise provided via Advance Indiana.