Proposal to Amend H-4 EAD Rule Delayed Until June 2018

During December of last year, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), announced that the agency was beginning to take preliminary steps to terminate H-4 Employment Authorization for certain H-4 spouses, a privilege that has been available to eligible spouses of H-1B nonimmigrant workers since 2015. As it stands, the 2015 H-4 EAD rule allows certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrant workers the ability to obtain an employment authorization card (work permit), provided the H-1B nonimmigrant worker is in the process of obtaining an employment based green card.

Proposal to Amend the 2015 H-4 EAD Rule

On December 14, 2017, a rulemaking notice was first published in the Federal Register notifying the public that the Department of Homeland Security, in conjunction with USCIS, would be reviewing and possibly amending the 2015 H-4 EAD rule, following the issuance of Executive Order 13788, “Buy American, Hire American.”

According to the notice published in the Federal Register, DHS reserves the authority to amend the 2015 H-4 EAD rule under section 102 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and section 103(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These sections of the law give the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security the discretionary power to amend the law so that it aligns with the policies set out in the President’s executive order.

H-4 EAD Rule Remains Valid: Eligible Spouses Should Apply Immediately

The current H-4 EAD rule passed in 2015 continues to remain valid and H-4 eligible spouses may continue to apply for and obtain employment authorization from USCIS. H-4 spouses however must be advised that since the process to dismantle eligibility is well underway, they should apply for the benefit immediately.

DHS Status Report Reveals Proposed Rule is expected June 2018

On February 28, 2018, DHS filed a status report providing insight into its proposal to dismantle the H-4 EAD rule. The status report reveals that a draft proposal was in the works to amend the rule by February 2018, however the draft was ultimately delayed in January when USCIS found that significant revisions to the draft were necessary. DHS however still plans to proceed with publishing a proposed rule, however that rule will not be published in the Federal Register until June 2018. The status report provides that, “DHS anticipates submitting to the Office of Management and Budget for review and clearance the proposed rule in time for publication in June 2018.”

Please continue to check our blog during that time for further updates on the proposal.

About Jacob J. Sapochnick

Jacob Sapochnick is recognized as one of the most innovative, up and coming Immigration Lawyers in the nation. He devotes 100% of his practice to Immigration Law, representing Corporations, Hotels, Restaurants, and other organizations, as well as, entrepreneurs, and individuals worldwide. He also provides legal support and representation in family sponsored immigration matters.more >>

Featured Posts

On December 27, 2016 in Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016) the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) handed down a groundbreaking decision which has changed the analytical framework for determining eligibility of national interest waivers. This new decision will affect foreign nationals who are pursuing a green card based on employment in […]

Do’s and Don’ts If you are considering applying for a temporary visitor visa to travel to the United States for purposes of leisure or to receive temporary medical treatment, there are several things you should be aware of. First, you should understand what you can do while on a temporary visitor visa and what […]

It is a pleasure for our law office to introduce associate attorney Nadia Galash to our readers Bio: Nadia Galash has been a California licensed attorney since 2009 and has been practicing immigration law since 2011. Nadia Galash specializes in adjustment of status/permanent resident processing; citizenship; deportation and removal proceedings before Immigration Court; law and motion […]