-> I really appreciate your help, I just think that the current situation
-> is still not satisfactory. For context, all of this concerns NumPy
-> and SciPy: there's lots of interest in those projects in using more
-> doctests, and we recently switched to using nose for all numpy/scipy
-> testing. But numpy/scipy have gobs of extension code, and adequate
-> support for nose finding doctests in extension code is really a huge
-> issue for us in the long run.
I can't work on this myself, but:
+1
Scientific code depends HEAVILY on C extensions, so this is really
important.
(Fernando, if it isn't fixed by SciPy, let's sit down and fix it
together.)
--t
--
C. Titus Brown, ctb at msu.edu