Friday, 13 October 2017

Sócrates

This week we were not going to post but as we have been asked more than
once how much does the accusation made against José Socrates by the
Public Ministry will have in the Maddie case.

Straight away we will say that it will have little. But even if little it may have some.

The
game has only one name and that is Theresa May.

The Prime-Minister many
said a coughing fit in a speech had put an end to her career once and
for all. A week has passed and it must be said she does seem to have
very strong fingertips.

We do think the fact Socrates has been accused by the Public Ministry of 31 crimes(3 charges of passive corruption of holder of a political position, 16 charges of money laundering, 3 charges of falsification of documents and 3 charges of premeditated tax fraud) may have some implications for the Maddie case.

Not decisive, just politically embarrassing for the UK in case it decides for archival in the Maddie case.

Let’s first put in context the accusation against Sócrates and the other 27 accused.

Nothing has been proved against Socrates nor any of the other 18 individuals and 9 collective entities.

The
Public Ministry after a long investigation has come to the conclusion
that there is, according to it, solid evidence against these people that
merited an accusation.

To prove that this proves nothing, we
remind people that the McCanns thought that they had solid evidence
against Mr Amaral that merited an accusation against him, which in the
end proved not to be real.

It will now be up to the various
defense teams to dismantle each accusation. If they aren’t able to do it in a
convincing way the case will proceed to court. If they are able to, the case ends.

In this the
Socrates process differs significantly with the McCann v Amaral one. In
the latter, it was 2 private parties which could at any point in time
come to an agreement and so put a stop to the process.

With these 28 accused, there is no possibility of agreement between the parties.

The
process may be stopped only for technical reasons – which we are not seeing
that possibility being possible as all throughout the investigation
Socrates’ defense has attacked legally every which way the process and
has lost all their appeals with the exception of one, which was to be
able to access the majority of the investigation files.

We think Socrates’ legal team has lost all other appeals. And they were many.

Once,
if that will be the case, the process goes to court, we don’t think we
have to explain to our readers what happens. The McCann v Amaral case
has given all the entire spectrum a legal process can undergo once into
court.

A political analyst, a highly reputed lawyer himself, José Miguel Judice, has on TV reminded rightfully all that if at the end of
the of it all no one is found guilty, LEGALLY, the Portuguese Justice
System will come out of it as unscathed as if every single accusation is
deemed as proven and a respective sentence handed out.

LEGALLY,
what matters is that the Public Ministry has done its job the best way
it thought it could do and has passed it to the next level.

SOCIALLY, he said, the issue will make a big difference to the system on whether there will be convictions or not.

But what we want to highlight at this point in time is that the presumption of innocence of all accused remains untouched.

However,
it’s the right of every citizen to form an opinion and there are
indicia about how strong the Public Ministry thinks it has made its
case.

We won’t get into the ‘popular’ details of Socrates’
peculiar friendship with the other of the accused Carlos Santos Silva.
It matters little to what we want to say at this moment and we will
leave it for the appropriate entities within the Portuguese Justice
System to analyse it.

What we would like to highlight are the following names that have been accused:

From
the above one can see that these people truly represented the backbone
of the country, politically, financially and economically.

Just
to give an example, about Ricardo Salgado – then called the ‘Owner of
All This’ (Dono Disto Tudo) – in the book “The Last Banker” by Maria
João Babo and Maria João Gago there’s this passage:

“José
Guilherme and the president of BES know each other for tens of year.
The builder consulted frequently with the banker. When he decided to
expand his businesses to East Europe, Ricardo Salgado advised him
against it. As an alternative, he recommended Angola. And even would
have indicated with whom to contact in Luanda.A few years later, before how the success of the investment had been, Guilherme made the point of showing the BES leader how he was grateful.And it was because of this that he gave him a present. Of 14 million euros.”

A
common problem everyone has when wanting to offer a present to someone who already has
everything. It’s always the best solution to give them the money so that they can
buy whatever they wish to buy with it.

We are using this example just to show what established powers against which the accusation was made on last Wednesday.

The money these people moved and had is in the multiple billions (or in Portuguese, thousands of millions) a completely ball park figure than the millions mentioned in the process. Not judging their richness, power or influence, which certainly is not our place, just putting in context the numbers involved in the accusation.

Sócrates, when Prime-Minister, was evidently powerful.

Then, he was a decisive piece on the board. But as it happens to all Prime-Ministers or equivalent all over the world without exception, once he left the job he became simply an ex-PM.

Those who tried to suck up to him when he was the PM, then simply started to trying to suck up to whoever was in that position next. It’s like that everywhere in the world and will continue to be so in the future: in politics what matters is the position one holds and not who one is.

Sócrates the ex-PM in material terms is just a little fish in comparison with some of the names which accompany him in this accusation.

The
public ministry could have decided to move against José Sócrates on his
own but instead decided to go against a group of very, very powerful
people.

This tells us that the Public Ministry thinks the accusation it has formulated against all of them is indeed solid.

The courts will decide if it is or not.

The day before the accusation, Socrates’ assets (just like it happened with Mr Amaral) were seized.

The more optimistic have said that this will last for at least 7 to 8 years. We think it will last a while longer. A long while longer.

But where this has implications with the Maddie case is that whatever
the outcome, there is no question that the Portuguese Justice System
has shown that it is not scared to move against established powers and
the powerful. The very powerful.

We are reminded of Jim Gambles’s words on May 9 2010 (3 days before Theresa May became Home Secretary) about the Maddie case:

“Senior child protection officer Jim Gamble has asked Scotland Yard to take a fresh look at the three-year investigation.He
blasted Portuguese cops for their handling of the hunt for Maddie - who
vanished aged three from her family's Algarve holiday apartment in
2007. Now the Met Police are set to review all leads in the case, using
technology and standards expected in a UK homicide or kidnap.”

We
are now waiting for the “standards expected in a UK” investigation can
be brought up to match the standards now shown by the Portuguese Justice
System under the penalty of being internationally shamed by it.

Lastly, we will leave for the reader to read the transcript of José Socrates’ participation in Bilton’s documentary:

Richard
Bilton [voice off/over]: The theory was falling apart. Goncalo Amaral was
removed from the case. He blamed political interference from London. Mr
Amaral’s supporters claim that he was taken off the case after an
ultimatum from Gordon Brown to the Portuguese PM at a European summit.Bilton: Did Gordon Brown take time out of the negotiations for the Lisbon Treaty to talk to you about Madeleine McCann?José Socrates: No!! No, of course not [laughs].Bilton: That has been suggested.Socrates:[laughs] But it's not true. It's not true!Bilton:
The lead investigator on the McCann case, Goncalo Amaral, he has
claimed – he may have been joking – that his job was the price of
Britain signing the Lisbon Treaty. What do you make of that?Socrates:
Pfff… Well, I think he considers himself in a high level. But it's not [laughs] true. The Lisbon Treaty [laughs] with Goncalo Amaral, [laughs]
the head of Goncalo, no, no. Well, sometimes people like to make some
characters of a drama [laughs] they never lived.

38 comments:

Thank you for todays article, I don't pretend to understand Portugal's politics but what I do find interesting is what you have pointed out that Portugal is not scared of building a case against powerful people.

I'm very grateful for this article, Textusa. Although I'm not Portuguese, speaking daily its language has turned this country mine. I basically feel some compassion for the MCs, but I can't forgive them to have let the media treat Portugal, its institutions and its people the shameful way they did. At least they behaved like lurkers. One word of them would have been enough to stop this.

One thing we have been proud of lately is to have finally having got rid of Michell's importance in the case by establishibg at what real level the game has always happened.

He's just a pathetic paid clown with the same importance to the case as a Mark Williams-Thomas just to use as an example. People who have prostituted their names and faces to perpetuate a hoax that disgustingly disrespects the death of a little girl, Maddie McCann and of a woman, Brenda Leyland.

Please don't give this disgusting human being any sort of oxygen. Not on this blog.

Hi textusa,the Uk are to appoint Sir Bernard Hogan Howe into the House of Lords,jim gamble must be pissing himself with laughter at how thick the people within the Uk must be to have this former Metropolitan Police chief,now sit in judgement on leglislation on how to govern the UK,especially as we now know that Jim gamble pushed for a review for the Metropolitan Police force,fuck me what a corrupt United kingdom,please turnout the fucking lights,there is no justice in this world,end of period?PS sorry for the expleitives but it is what it is?

José Rodrigues dos Santos [RTP anchor]: Outside the summit, the British Prime-Minister has revealed that he will discuss the Madeleine case with José Sócrates, the encounter will happen still today.

Gordon Brown: I am meeting the Portuguese Prime-Minister later, later… and we will discuss this issue, I have discussed it with him before, just to assure myself that the police authorities are, are, are taking the action that are, that are necessary and that and there’s proper cooperation between the British and the Portuguese police but I haven’t had the one to one meeting with the Prime-Minister that I’m going to have later this evening…

We have to assume this was another deliberate misinformation in Biltons programme. A big effort to dis Goncalo and make him look foolish by being economical with the actualite. Oh what a tangled web they weave....

The question one must ask is why wasn't Gordon Brown interviewed by Bilton - he doesn't say that Mr Brown did not have availability or didn't want to comment on the case.

We would find perfectly natural if Mr Brown denied such a request to comment, as, in theory, an ex-PM we think has 'better' things to do than to comment on an ongoing police investigation.

So we find rather strange for Richard Bilton to have asked José Sócrates to comment and not Gordon Brown, as well as to the fact that the Portuguese former PM made time available to not say nothing relevant to the truth but only to make a significant effort to ridicule Mr Amaral.

Talk about taking a hammer to squash a pea. Why was an ex PM used to gave credibility to the theory that GA was unhinged and delusional. Regardless of whether it was true or not would somebody in his position really stoop to the level of piffing and laughing as if he was sitting in a pub with a couple of mates. Wouldn't a dignified comment ( if anything at all) be more consistent with somebody in his position................the man is accused of 31 crimes wouldn't you have thought that With the knowledge that anything he says now will be scrutinised to assess his credibility as an honourable man that he would have maintained some sort of dignified silence. Not haven't followed the Socrates case when I seen him on panarama I assumed that all accusations against him must have been dropped otherwise he wouldn't have piffed and laughed in a case which regardless of anything else involved the death of a wee girl. I mean is it appropriate for anybody to piff and laugh in such circumstances.let alone an ex PM.

You correct Textusa this game is played a lot further up the food chain than creepy Clarence somebody who could pursuade a an ex PM to appear piffing and laughing on that program holds significantly power. It is kinda akin to putting David Cammeron into I'm a celebrity.

I also kinda hate to miss the opportunity to piff and laugh at Jim Gambles comment of bringing to the case the standards you would expect in a uk investigation. Really from the head of SB

Portuguese have a deep inferiority complex, which doesn't exclude a certain boasting. José Socrates thought that laughing and mocking he would put himself at the level of a European PM in charge of crucial issues. He did, you're right, exactly the contrary. Isabel Duarte likely thought that attacking police officers of her country and defending the MCs against winds and tides would dignify her as a kind of heroine. Not only it didn't, but meanwhile she put the MCs in a real mess.

For those still giving Sutton any credit. This is from April this year. 9 days later the hero comes out to say Operation Grange is biased in favour of the McCanns (and one must assume he’s suggesting Grange should look at them first). Go figure:

Hi textusa,in April 2008,Scotland Yard/Interpol confirmed they could find No connection to a Paedophile Gang thought to have taken Madeleine McCann?Nichola,has booked the flight for her small Team to explore the possibility of Colin Sutton's theory,they have now organised a trip to the middle East,to pick up any loose leads?

We thought Sutton doesn't have a theory. He has said it himself that even though he has read a lot about the case, he hadn't come to any sort of conclusion.

All he says he he knows is that he was told OG was just to clear the McCanns but then it turned out it was only an advise not to accept the case to then say that the bit about clearing the McCanns was just an assumption on his part.

So it is quite strange to follow the theory of someone who doesn't have a theory and is quite imaginative about the things he hears from friends (at least Gamble didn't have any doubt that Sutton would be leading the review that he proposed but then it wasn't by him but by the McCanns, or was it by Rebekah Brooks and the Sun?

Did Mr Sócrates ever commented on the sending of “British Police liaison officers” to Portugal in the hours following Maddie’s disappearance? I always puzzled why he was never publicly questioned about that (if I am not mistaken).

Maybe, again, he never discussed the issue with Tony Blair at the time, and therefore has nothing to do with that decision.

That would make him a puppet PM back in 2007. Or, maybe, just a liar. Either way, possibly not the most influential character in this whole saga, but certainly one of the most pathetic ones, who fully deserved this humble tribute paid by Textusa.

I don't know if I would call him pathetic. I don't know enough about him but I think a lot of decisions were made politically by both countries as a result of pressure. When these decisions are recognised as errors then people try to protect themselves or their position which led to the mess the case is in. At that stage its needs political will (I think those are GA words) to sort it out

You must be talking about the political pressure that UK put on Portugal from the very beginning of this case.

Besides, I don't see what kind of political pressure can arise from the disappearance of a child, however tragic, sad and revolting it is. Let's not confuse media pressure with political pressure (in this case, I believe that the former was used to increase the latter).

We might never get to know why Mr Sócrates bowed so easily to that pressure. He might have thought at the time that it was a small diplomatic favor which would go almost unnoticed. But he will be remembered as the Portuguese PM who enabled political interference in the Maddie case and indirectly hindered the course of justice.

As Carlos Anjos said,Clarence Mitchell,"He Lies with As Many teeth as He has In his Head"So the smooth operators were believed ahead of the Truth,the PR machine bluffed and bull shitted it's way for over Ten Years?The MSM are still doing it to you today?I Just watched last Night in the UK a Documentary on Mr George Michael,now whether you like George Michael or not I'm not questioning,but he was a gifted Pop song Writer artist.What stood out most was the Way he Refused to be Held to "Ransom"by his Sony contract,that he had signed as a Younger Pop musician? That is the difference which was lost on a hell of a lot of people,George Michael was No longer a"POP" muscician he had become an Artist.Sony Only wanted him to supply a certain type of music,where the artist wished to further his understanding of Music to a wider audience of which they wanted to suppress?where Sony had won their case in a court on a "Contract" issue but had ultimately to concede the musician had a right to freedom of expression as an artist but with another Producer.They wanted to"control Him" and his music,that was the issue,which Sony couldn't recognise or where too big for their Boots to back down on an artist having rights to their Own music? this is what happens in most peoples lives, they are controlled by outside influences,the person is never allowed to develop or only in the controlled environment produced in a mechanical robotic processed way of life,De Ja Veaux?

"It is understood that the result of the appeal will not be known for at least four years."Before any outcome, the appeal has to be accepted... Unfortunately rejections are not published on the CEDH website (appelants are informed by mail). Thanks to this article of the Daily Mail the MCs capitalize on time (4 years).

There seems to be something we have said that is quickly becoming na internet myth of something that Kate has said (very much like the existing one saying that Gerry said “show me the body” when he never said such a thing).

In this case it’s the phrase “All those who are to be implicated will be implicated” that some allege Kate has said it. She hasn’t. We did. In our post “Tide change”.http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2016/02/tide-change.html

This is what we said in that post:

“From article #1:

“I’m convinced my Maddie is still in the Algarve, says Kate McCann”, KATE McCann yesterday said she is convinced whoever snatched Madeleine from the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz never took her far”

“That’s where she last was and I don’t think she’s been taken a million miles from there”

“I’ve always said Praia da Luz is the place where I feel closest to her”

“but Kate believes Madeleine probably never left the country”

“she said she and husband Gerry have learned from their years of research that abducted children are generally not taken far”.

Article #2 doesn’t mention Praia da Luz. It is about the twins so understandably unlikely for that town to have been mentioned.

From article #3:

“Kate, from Rothley, Leicester, said she feels Maddie is still in the Algarve as that's the place she feels "closest" to her daughter.”

To sum up the message of the 3 articles: I want closure, the twins are ready and what happened to Maddie in Praia da Luz is to be disclosed.

Very simple, very direct, very straightforward and very objective.

And what happened to Maddie is really all that happened to her. From the death to disposal. Thus the near Praia da Luz and not only Praia da Luz.

I quote you stating the following "like the existing one saying that Gerry said “show me the body” when he never said such a thing"

Oh Yes, he has, though he expressed exactly the same thing by just using a different verb for "show", namely "find" and it's documented on YouTube. I've seen it so many times, and I can look it up later. "Find the/her body and prove (that) we killed her", he said and I've always found it very queer that he associated his and Kate's guilt with Madeleine's dead body, as anybody, if she were dead, could have killed/murdered her.

Hi TextusaGerry answered a journalist outside Lisbon Court and was very irritated. I couldn't believe my ears. I only pay attention to what the McCanns and their friends say, not to what the papers allege he say. I'll find a link to it somewhere and give it to you. At the time I thought I didn't have to download it, because I took for granted that millions of people must have heard it and at least a few having downloaded it. Obviously not? Of course I'll also read the post about "Debunking A Myth", to see your view on it. Anyway, I haven't dreamt, misunderstood or made up what I claim to have heard.

I've found one video clip, seems to come from a non-professional filmer. It's short labelled "Gerry McCann gets annoyed outside Lisbon Court. I'm pretty sure that in the extension of this interview Gerry very furious challenged the journalist with this phrase. The clip seems to be cut down. If anyone could help me in trying to place this video in time and in context it would help a lot in proving what Gerry really said before the interview was finished.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

As of Jan 19 2019 we're waiting for Jules to own the blog.

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)