Open letter to Members of the European Parliament (BRussells Tribunal and International Anti-Occupation Networks)

The EU has moral and legal obligations towards Iraq after
several of its member states ignored the warnings of the anti-war voices not to
attack the country in 2003.

On the occasion of the meeting on Iraq in the European
Parliament on July 16th 2014

Open letter to Members of the European Parliament

On the occasion of the meeting on Iraq in the European Parliament on
July 16th 2014

The EU has moral and legal obligations towards Iraq after several of its
member states ignored the warnings of the anti-war voices not to attack the
country in 2003.

The failure to protect the ordinary citizens of Iraq, the deliberate harm
inflicted on certain communities as well as the gross human rights violations
being committed by the Iraqi government’s forces on a daily basis with total
impunity have been met with silence. According to Human Rights Watch 255 Sunni
prisoners were murdered mainly by militia supporting prison guards in the last
four weeks. All detainees must be protected immediately!

The reality of the situation is bleak: Prime Minister Maliki has built an
authoritarian state where ruthless paramilitary groups such as Assaib Ahel Al
Haq have more military weight than the regular army. These sectarian militias
are given a free hand to terrorise communities, to commit kidnapping, to torture
and to carry out extra judicial killings with impunity. The militias have been
carrying out sectarian cleansing in Baghdad against the Sunnis, as reported by
the media and NGOs. It is Maliki´s policies of discrimination, repression and
exclusion that also bears responsibility for the increase of acts of terrorism
by sectarian groups like ISIS. Neither Maliki nor his allies are really fighting
terrorism but rather are using them as a pretext for their policies. These
attempts are doomed to failure and have only alienated and terrorised even more
communities.. Only the Iraqi people, united in defence of their nation, can
defeat terrorism.

There are tens of other armed groups and militias - some of them linked to
the Prime Minister's Office - that are involved in indiscriminate killings and
are responsible for creating a sectarian bloodbath in Iraq. The national,
non-sectarian forces leading the uprising against Maliki have strongly
condemned, as we do, all terrorist actions.

The use of air strikes allegedly in order to fight terrorism is also a failed
strategy. This policy has led to the indiscriminate killing of thousands of
innocent civilians and the destruction of their homes .The US occupation tried
it and the subsequent Green Zone governments of Iraq also tried it. Even as all
observers agree that the solution in Iraq is not a military one, the US, Iran
and others rush to aid Maliki with weapons and personnel. This strategy acts as
a hatching machine for hatred and resentment as a result of the wholesale
criminalisation of communities. We urge you therefore to speak up against the
bombing of Iraqi villages, towns and cities.

One of the main reasons for the peaceful protests that began in Fallujah,
Anbar, Tikrit, Mosul and other places in December 2012 was the news that women,
arrested arbitrarily in lieu of their men folk, were being tortured and raped in
detention. The peaceful protesters had well documented, clear demands starting
with the release of all female detainees, the cancelling of article 4 of the
Terrorism Law which is often used as a pretext for arbitrary arrests/torture and
rape (see HRW report No One is Safe), the repeal the de-baathification decree
introduced by Paul Bremer, and an end to all sectarian/ethnic discrimination and
the rejection of partition of the country. The government met the peaceful
protests with bombs and even massacres,) including the assassination
of unarmed and injured protesters.

We call for :

1) the immediate ban on the flow of arms to Maliki's government.

2) a halt all airstrikes and military operations in Iraqi towns and
cities.

3) the creation of safe corridors to deliver aid and humanitarian
supplies to the civilians in areas of conflict.

4) an end to all measures of collective punishments such as the
cutting off of water/electricity/withholding food stuffs and payment of
salaries.

5) the protection of prisoners, the release all detainees not
charged or tried and the end to all forms of arbitrary arrests, maltreatment and
torture.

6) the undertaking of immediate measures to protect civilians
(especially the displaced) and the safeguarding of their human
rights.

7) the establishment of a new, non-sectarian government that rejects
the imposed political process and constitution imposed by the
occupation. Only such a government can guarantee Iraq´s borders
and security.

8) the encouragement and active support from the EU, respecting the
UNSecurity Council resolution to defend the unity and
territorial integrity of Iraq, for immediate negotiations to establish such a
government.

Through these measures the EU can
assume its moral and legal responsibility to the people of Iraq.

International
Anti-Occupation Network and the BRussells Tribunal - July 14,
2014

(6)Though it received little global attention, unrest in Fallujah, a
primarily Sunni city, began in late 2012 with protests against the hardline
policies of Nouri al-Maliki, the Shiite prime minister. Like many residents,
Wardi sees the military campaign, which began in January, as retribution. “This
started under the banner of fighting terrorists but changed to attacking the
city,” she said. “It’s punishment for the people.” “They describe government
artillery fire raining down on the city, targeting even the hospital, as Human
Rights Watch documented in May. Army helicopters have also used barrel bombs —
crude and inexact explosives that level surrounding homes along with intended
targets when they fall from the sky. “They’re completely indiscriminate — if not
actively targeting Sunni civilians,” Erin Evers, the Human Rights Watch
researcher in Iraq, said of the government’s military campaign in Fallujah and
elsewhere in Anbar, such as the city of Ramadi, which has seen a similar cycle
of protests and violence.” Shades Of Syria: Fears Maliki Will Follow The Assad
Model In Iraq. http://www.buzzfeed.com/mikegiglio/shades-of-syria-fears-that-maliki-will-follow-the-assad-mode
Call on UN Security Council, U.S. and EU to prevent the bombardment of civilians
in Iraq Struan Stevenson President, European Iraqi Freedom Association (EIFA) http://iraq4allnews.dk/irak/index.php/news1532.html
(7) “Maliki never appointed a permanent, parliament-confirmed interior
minister, nor a defense minister, nor an intelligence chief. Instead, he took
the positions for himself.” “In short, Maliki’s one-man, one-Dawa-party Iraq
looks a lot like [Saddam]Hussein’s one-man, one-Baath Party Iraq. But at least
Hussein helped contain a strategic American enemy: Iran. And Washington didn’t
spend $1 trillion propping him up. There is not much “democracy” left if one man
and one party with close links to Iran control the judiciary, police, army,
intelligence services, oil revenue, treasury and the central bank. Under these
circumstances, renewed ethno-sectarian civil war in Iraq was not a possibility.
It was a certainty” - Why we stuck with Maliki — and lost Iraq http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-we-stuck-with-maliki--and-lost-iraq/2014/07/03/0dd6a8a4-f7ec-11e3-a606-946fd632f9f1_story.html
(8)The United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by
Law Enforcement Officials state that security forces in policing situations
shall “apply non-violent means before resorting to the use of force and
firearms.http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/01/03/iraq-investigate-violence-protest-camp
Iraq: Investigate Violence at Protest Camp Fighting Erupts in Anbar Province
After Security Forces, Protesters Clash.

Frustrated with living in fear and in constant violation of their rights, the
people of Iraq took to the streets to demand that their basic human rights be
respected. Their action took the form of peaceful demonstrations, which began on
25 December 2012 in Al-Anbar province. Since then, the demonstrations have grown
in geography, expanding to cities throughout the country, and in number with
hundreds of thousands of participants. The protests first called for the release
of female detainees who are subjected to inhumane treatment, but now encompass a
range of demands including the immediate release of fellow protestors; the
abolition of anti-terrorist laws; the cessation of house raids without legal
warrant and the end of financial, administrative and legal corruption. GICJ
requests that an independent international investigation mission be dispatched
to Iraq http://www.gicj.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=290&Itemid=41&mylang=english&redir=1

“The main reason for the fall of the city of Mosul – the second largest city
in Iraq – is that the Maliki government did not respond to the demands of the
citizen protestors who demonstrated in Mosul, Anbar, Salahuddin, Diyala and
Hawija over a year ago and so the citizens did not support the Iraqi army.The
policy of the Iraqi government headed by Nouri al-Maliki has been totally
sectarian in the way it has operated in the Iraqi provinces. The government has
almost totally excluded representatives of the Sunni population from the
sovereign ministries, or left them with no real authority. Even the new Iraqi
army was formed on this basis. The Iraqi army unfortunately does not support a
doctrine of loyalty to the homeland (or an Iraq that is inclusive of all
people); instead it is loyal to the Madhhab or Shia doctrine. It deals with
citizens according to their religious sect. The armed forces have attacked
people in the cities of Mosul, Anbar, Salahuddin, Diyala and Hawija. They have
carried out arrests, torture and extortion. There have also been many cases of
rape by members of the army, both outside and inside prisons.” http://www.iraqicivilsociety.org/archives/3235

About Me

We do not open attachments. Stop e-mailing them. Threats and abusive e-mail are not covered by any privacy rule. This isn't to the reporters at a certain paper (keep 'em coming, they are funny). This is for the likes of failed comics who think they can threaten via e-mails and then whine, "E-mails are supposed to be private." E-mail threats will be turned over to the FBI and they will be noted here with the names and anything I feel like quoting.
This also applies to anyone writing to complain about a friend of mine. That's not why the public account exists.