New Age History and Economics

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Statue of Sardar Patel is Need of the hour. Like Sardar
Patel United India now Indians needs to be united and be free from caste
divisions.

Corruption
in India begins and ends with Indian Judiciary. If one has to end corruption in
India Prime Minister must begin with cleaning Indian Judiciary.

China is
flexing its muscles in South China Sea, Indo-China border. Russia is flexing
its muscles in Ukraine. Israel is committing Holocaust of Palestinians in Gaza.
Japan is old friend of India when it sent its forces for liberation of India by
helping INA of Subash Chander Bose and also arch enemy of China. it is time for
old friends to meet including Vietnam.

Hindus do not vote on communal lines. For politicians it
is Vote first, nation last.

To remove poverty India must introduce One child norm.

India needs anti corruption laws. Corrupt should be
hanged and their property confiscated. India is poor but Indians politicians,
bureaucrats and judges are rich. this is not acceptable. taxpayers money is
meant to provide education , health, roads, rails, metros, electricity, water,
sanitation to all.

Practically we are Kleptocracy [rule of thieves] &
emotional fools/votors since 47. We bring Anti Indian govts like Communist
which supported China in 62 war, Owaisi party is offspring of Razakars who
wanted separate Hyderabad & Owaisi have same type of dreams. Dynasty rule
since 47 did not work and have divided India like Nehru Jinnah reason for
partition, Nehru-Abdullah family did not allow Sardar Patel to integrate
J&K, Mamta destroying Bengal, Mulayam, Maywati destroying UP by Muslim vote
bank, Lalu, Paswan destroyed Bihar state for Muslim vote bank. Kashmiris,
Assamese, Bengalis Hindus are refugee in India. and we treat northeastern
Indians as Chinese and yet call china aggressors?

The traditional system of single earners was economically
and socially better as it led to less demand for money and less professional or
work interaction led to more domestic and social harmony.

It is wrong to say that Rajiv Gandhi @ Khan died for
India. He did not die for protecting Indian sovereignty but he died for for
protecting Sir Lanka sovereignty.

Pre-nupital contract be allowed. The oaths, promises and
undertaking that is administered at the time of marriage (Hindu marriages)
needs drastic amendments as it is of Vedic age. Times have changed and laws of
the land have changed. Men and women need to treated as equals and the new
contracts or oaths should include that both husband and wife will try to
support the family and work for the family and
be responsible for the family in equal measure. It should also include that if
at any stage, some discord develops, it is the duty of both to try and settle
it amicably whether it is financial matter or any other. So, to protect the
institution of marriages, new rules should provide the couples some scope to
live apart or get separated permanently with settlements by mutual agreements
entered into at time of marriage.

For last 60 years, Muslims feel insecure. For last 60
years Muslims have been voting for Congress. For last 60 years, Congress and
later other parties like NCP, JDU, RJD, SP, BSP, AAP has been threatening
Muslims of communalism. The threat which these parties themselves created to
get Muslims votes. For last 60 years Congress has not allowed Muslims to live
in peace. Muslims are still insecure. To all Muslims who vote on religious
lines – Try to change how you have been voting in last 60 years. Vote for Modi
and for first time in several decades you may actually feel secure.

Reliance and Politics; 1. Dhirubhai Ambani rose due to
corruption and he corrupted all and sundry. 2. gas and oil are national
treasure and they must remain in national hands. 3. linking everything in terms
of dollar when dollar is printed by private sector federal reserve would mean
subjugating our freedom to others

In last 60
years of congress rule, more and more people have become backward, more and
more people have died of hunger and cold, more and more people are jobless.

News 1 - why colonies and villages are important?
because they have over 70% of voters.
News 2 - Money and liquor or daily wages being given in colonies to vote.

Great India consists all SAARC nations who were present today on
swearing in of Indian PM. It was a welcome sight to see all important leaders
from Great India on one platform.

Judiciary
must get itself independent from corruption, nepotism and sycophancy. a disease
afflicting Judiciary at all levels

Only those
who have honor know what honor is and what it means losing it at hands of
unscrupulous persons. It is dereliction of duty by High court to insist on
compromise, on one hand it shows that HC does not know how to decide cases on
merits and on other it encourages and promotes crime and. (on delhi high court
for compromise between gadkari and Kejriwal)

Indians think they have developed. but i feel
we have become less free less honest, less brave less compassionate. we were
more honest earlier till we became westernized.

There are
seven estates. Three paid by Taxpayers namely Legislature, Executive &
Judiciary. There are four more outside the organs of state. They are; 4th
Media, 5th bankers / corporates, 6th religion - Godmen and 7th Organized Crime.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

1. Was necessary to save allied lives/Preferable
to an invasion. Although the necessity of a US invasion was debated within the
US military (US Army was for, US Navy was against) the general consensus
judging by the Battle of Iwo Jima and Battle of Okinawa is that an invasion of
the Japanese home islands would be costly.

2. A deterrent to the USSR. The Soviets
invaded Manchuria on August 9, 1945 only 3 days after the Hiroshima bombing and
9 hours before the Nagasaki bombing. The US were aware that the USSR would
enter the Pacific War on 9 August because at the Yalta Conference Stalin had
promised Roosevelt that he would declare war on Japan no later than 3 months after
the end of the war in Europe (Germany surrendered on 7 May, which makes 9
August the latest date in which the Soviets would declare war on Japan). It was
therefore no coincidence that Truman unleashed two nukes, one 3 days before and
one 9 hours after 9 August. It was an attempt to end the war before the Soviets
could occupy significant territory as well as showing the USSR that the US was
in possession of nukes.

Now the truth; CON'S

Evil is as evil does. Mass burning of
civilians mainly children, women or old men is not a war crime. It is crime
against humanity. Dropping atomic bomb on women, children old men was biggest
terrorist activity the world has ever seen.

MILITARILY UNNECESSARY

- Evidence shows that the atomic bombs played
little to no role in Japan's surrender. The 2nd bomb dropped on Nagasaki was on
August 9 but Japan didn't surrender until August 15. If the atomic bombs played
a decisive role in Japan's surrender, Japan would've surrendered immediately
rather than wait 7 days at the risk of more atomic bombings. Particularly when
USA did not have any other bombs to drop. Remember it was just a 3 day gap
between the bombing of Hiroshima and the bombing of Nagasaki. The atomic
bombings were obviously not enough to convince them. As many in the U.S.
military predicted, the atomic bombs were unnecessary and futile to get Japan
to surrender.

- Between August 9 and August 15 the Soviets
declared war on Japan, invaded Japanese occupied China and destroyed the
Japanese army in Manchuria. This event was what persuaded the Japanese to
surrender on August 15. This is because Japan believed they could still end the
war on favourable terms if the Soviet Union stayed out of it, but the Soviet
intervention crushed all hopes Japan had left. This is proven by the fact that
while the Japanese cabinet ignored the atomic bombings, they panicked and
called an emergency meeting after hearing that the Soviets had invaded
Manchuria.

- Most U.S. military commanders such as
Eisenhower, MacArthur, Leahy and Nimitz confessed in their memoirs and wartime
diaries that the Soviet intervention and the U.S. naval blockade was enough to
get a Japanese surrender. These men knew more about the military situation than
President Truman.

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

- It's been suggested that Truman's real
motive in using the atomic bombs was not necessarily to end the war but to use
the atomic bombs on cities and people - something he couldn't do in a testing
site. Truman believed that the war against Japan was an opportunity to test the
atomic bomb on cities and people to examine its effects. This is proven by the
fact Truman selected Hiroshima and Nagasaki to drop the bombs - these two
cities were largely untouched, heavily populated and therefore allowed Truman
to measure and research for weapons of mass destruction on whole cities.

- Truman set up the Atomic Bomb Casualty
Commission (ABCC) after the war to examine the victims of the atomic bombs to
investigate the effects the atomic bombs had on their bodies. The ABCC was
purely for scientific research and it didn't provide any sort of medical care
for the victims (to their grief the survivors believed that was the ABCC's
purpose). This is further proof that Truman was interested in knowing how much
damage the atomic bombs caused on innocent civilians.

RACISM

- The Americans viewed the Japanese as a
sub-human race. All Japanese Americans were also put in camps. In 1944, a
public poll showed that 13% of the U.S. public voted for the "complete
extermination of the Japanese race". Such emotional anti-Japanese
sentiment made the U.S. public believe using atomic weapons on Japanese cities
was justified.

- After the war, many Americans saw a
connection between the way American troops mutilated the dead bodies of
Japanese troops, the fact that Japanese Americans were sent to internment
camps, and the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan. It was obvious that
there was intense hatred specifically toward the Japanese.

U.S. PROPAGANDA

- The U.S. military were the most sensitive
when it came to casualties, this is why they feared invading Japan. Contrast
this to the Japanese military thinking of kamikaze and banzai charge. The U.S.
were under a perception that the entire Japanese population was ready to resist
just like their military. Contrary to popular belief, Japan actually protected
their civilians and never forced women and children to fight. The bushido code
only applied to soldiers. At Iwo Jima, all the Japanese civilians were evacuated
before the battle and the only Japanese left on Iwo Jima were the soldiers. At
Okinawa, there were no Japanese civilians to begin with. The civilians at
Okinawa were Okinawans - who are a different ethnic group. As a result, the
Japanese treated them the same way as Chinese and Filipinos. The perception
that the Japanese would resist to the death was enhanced by U.S. propaganda to
justify the use of the atomic bomb.

- Truman definitely saw the propaganda value
that the atomic bombs would have. The dropping of the atomic bombs can even be
said as not the end of WWII but the start of the Cold War. Truman didn't want
to see any communism in Asia let alone Japan and therefore wanted to keep the
Soviets away. The Soviets were so stunned by the atomic bombings that they
didn't demand joint occupation of Japan like they did with Germany. This was
what Truman had hoped for. The Cold War had begun and it was USA 1 USSR 0.

TERRORISM

- Some have defined the atomic bombings as a
form of state terrorism no different to 9/11. In both cases, the U.S. and
al-Qaeda targeted innocents to achieve a political goal and psychologically
terrorize the population. As the former U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson
said in 1947: "The atomic bomb was more than a weapon of terrible
destruction; it was a psychological weapon." Same as terrorism.

WAR CRIME

- There are some who call it the classic
example of a war crime. Those who don't think it is a war crime ask yourself
this: Say the Allies won the war without dropping any atomic bombs. But say if
during the war Japan or Germany had dropped an atomic bomb on an Allied city.
Would you classify that act as a war crime?

Saving Lives;

Nowhere but in America do people get taught
that atomic bombs were used to save lives. I see it as an attempt by some
Americans to justify an atrocious war crime/ terrorism committed. Not even
President Truman thought about "saving lives" when he made the
decision. The use of atomic weaponry on civilian cities had no military
significance whatsoever in ending a war that was already over. Mislead by the
impact of the atomic bombings, not many Americans are even aware that the
Soviet Union entered the Pacific War - arguably the reason why Japan
surrendered exactly on August 15, 1945 and not sooner.

The flaw of the argument for atomic bombings
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is that it relies on the fact that a US invasion was
the only other alternative to end WW2.

Was a US invasion necessary?

With no navy, no air force, their armies
losing in China, their people at home starving to death, American bombers
ruling their skies, an effective American sea blockade in place, the Soviet
Union having just declared war on them, and with martial law imposed, Japan was
essentially defeated by August 1945. America had air superiority over Japanese
skies and sea superiority in Japanese waters. Japan didn't even have the
ability to shoot down the lone unguarded bombers that carried the atomic bombs.
Whether the US invaded it or not, Japan's surrender would've been inevitable.

Was there an alternative?

Without using atomic bombs or invading Japan,
Truman could've:

1.Waited until the Soviet Union declared war on Japan on August 9;-

- Because of the close proximity of the
Soviet Union's entry into the Pacific War and the nuclear bombings, it is
unclear over which one of these had the biggest impact to Japan's surrender. It
is quite possible that it was purely the Soviet Union's entrance into the
Pacific War that got the Japanese surrender when you compare the date Japan
surrendered (August 15) to the date the second atomic bomb was dropped (August
9). This lengthy timeframe may suggest that atomic bombs did not play a key
role in the surrender. By contrast, the Soviets invaded Manchuria on August 9,
and by August 15, occupied it and threatened the Japanese home islands.

2. Waited for the US sea blockade to end the war;-

- A sea blockade was more effective than a US
invasion to end WWII. The Japanese military were eagerly anticipating a US
invasion so they could inflict American casualties. If the US publicly denied
an invasion of Japan it would mean no American casualties and would signal to
Japan that defeat was inevitable. The US Navy was against an invasion and
strongly backed a sea blockade for this very reason. Fleet Admiral Chester
Nimitz and Gen. Carl Spaatz of the USAAF believed that in the event of this
scenario, Japanese leaders would ultimately give in. (Remember, Japan had no
navy and no air force to relieve the blockade).

3. Given a public message to Japan saying that the imperial family would
be saved from war crimes trials;-

- The Japanese military resisted primarily to
defend the imperial family from post-war prosecution. Japanese military leaders
believed the Allies' "unconditional surrender" meant that the
imperial family would be powerless. Truman did not assuage the feelings of
Japanese on this issue Gen. Douglas MacArthur knew the importance of the
imperial family to the Japanese military and therefore urged Truman to let
Japan know that no harm will befall their imperial family if Japan accepted the
unconditional surrender.

If Truman was truly humane and serious about
"saving lives" he would've tried these alternatives before resorting
to nuclear bombs. This is why I believe Truman purposely used nuclear weapons something
which probably FDR would have avoided which may have led to his death.

If the atomic bombs were dropped on the
fishes in the ocean to show its might or in the frontlines it wouldn't of been
such a big issue. The regrettable aspects of the atomic bombings were that it
was militarily unnecessary and used on civilians. Many Americans lack the
sympathy because their country was the perpetrator and not the victim. If
Germany or Japan had used an atomic bomb on Chicago, Los Angeles, New York,
Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix etc. There
is no doubt that Americans would condemn that act and call it a state terrorism
or war crime - even if the Germans argued that "it saved lives".

Is it a war crime?

Nuking civilian cities is classified as a war
crime, even back in 1945. The US signed the Hague Convention in 1907 regarding
the rules of war and the bombing of civilians. It was against international law
to deliberately target non-combatant civilians, and kill them by any method.
The atomic bombings resulted in the mass murder of millions of non-combatants
en masse, and the US therefore violated the Hague Convention and broke an
international treaty. It is never justified to break an international treaty
that your country had signed and pledged to abide to.

Is it terrorism?

The French word terrorisme is derived from the Latin verb terreō meaning "I
frighten" and refers to the killing of innocent people or civilians to
achieve a political goal by psychologically terrorizing the population by violent
"spectacle" or "Shock and Awe".

Former U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson
said in 1947: "The atomic bomb was more than a weapon of terrible
destruction; it was a psychological weapon." Same as terrorism

translate

Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Dedication

Dedicated to young Americans-May you benefit from observing how certain shadowy forces contrive to ruthlessly advance their own financial and ideological objectives at your expense. They select, then groom, and ultimately control many of our highest government officials. They plan the wars and through "foreign policy" arrange to set the stage for incidents to initiate hostilities. They overwork the word "Peace" to mislead you and create a plausible smoke screen in order to conceal their real operations. You can recognize who "they" are. Curtis Dall "FDR-My Exploited Father-in-Law".