Hi Ben & Andy,
* Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [110309 11:09]:
> * Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson at ti.com> [110309 06:00]:
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > On 3/9/2011 12:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >* Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson at ti.com> [110308 13:34]:
> > >>Hi Andy,
> > >>
> > >>Thanks for that really fast update. That looks pretty good at first
> > >>glance. I still have to review in details.
> > >
> > >Yes nice job!
> > >
> > >>And we need to find some volunteers for OMAP1& 2 testing.
> > >
> > >I gave it a quick try on osk5912, seems to work just fine.
> > >Will apply these for testing purposes to linux-omap tree while
> > >waiting for the minor fixes.
> > >
> > >Looks like Benoit should take the arch/arm/*omap*/*hwmod*
> > >patches, the rest should go throug Ben. So for all of them:
> >
> > Paul and I already acked the hwmod data, but the whole series should
> > maybe go through Ben, because the hwmod files will need some defines
> > added in the i2c header file. So we cannot separate the hwmod*
> > patches from the driver files patches.
>> Unfortunately the hwmod patches depend on omap-for-linus branch..
>> Considering this, it's probably best that I queue the whole series
> assuming we get acks from Ben for the driver related changes.
After looking at this again, I've changed my mind.
It looks like this series can be rebased on v2.6.38-rc8
and should merge just fine with what we have queued in
omap-for-linus. I guess I forgot we already did the i2c-omap
hwmod conversion last merge window :)
Andy, please repost the related patches against v2.6.38-rc8 with
the acks posted earlier.
Then Ben, please feel free to queue it after you get the rebased
series. We've had this series applied for testing for a while.
Regards,
Tony