Science of Baseball: Effect of Playing Surface on Batted Ball Velocity

The speed at which a baseball travels after impact with a playing surface has been referred to as playing surface pace. Little information
is available regarding the effects of varying construction and
maintenance practices on the pace of baseball playing surfaces. Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of construction and maintenance practices on a non-turfed basepath, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) turf, and
six synthetic turf surfaces. Factors evaluated on the non-turfed
basepath included soil compaction at installation, surface scarification, and topdressing
with a soil conditioner (calcined clay).The effects of cutting height
and thatch thickness were evaluated on Kentucky bluegrass, while the effects
of simulated traffic and grooming were evaluated on synthetic turf. On
the non-turfed basepath, increasing soil compaction yielded increases in
surface pace. Calcined clay topdressing and increasing scarification
depth did not affect surface pace. On Kentucky bluegrass, varying
cutting height
and thatch thickness levels had no effect on surface pace. On synthetic
turf, increases in simulated traffic resulted in slight increases in
pace. Surface
pace measurements on synthetic turf were less variable than those made
on natural turfgrass.The results indicate that the pace of commonly used
baseball playing surfaces is not easily altered with minimally invasive
maintenance procedures and should be addressed at construction or during aggressive renovations.

That abstract might be a bit difficult to parse through. The link to the pdf of the paper above may also be somewhat problematic. Really, the take home of this research was that the study evaluated many ways in which the velocity of a 100 mph baseball could differ. They evaluated three different kinds of turf: Kentucky blue grass, synthetic turfs, and turf-less plots. None, in this series of experiments, appeared to significantly impact the mean surface pace of the ball. Surface pace refers to the ratios of the velocity of the ball after striking the ground to the velocity of the ball before striking the ground. As expected, energy is lost by striking the ground, so all speeds are lower leaving the strike area than they are entering the strike area. Anyway, ground cover appeared to have no impact on velocity loss.

Grass thickness was also evaluated and yielded no significantly different results. The heights of the grass evaluated in this study also did not impact velocity loss. One can imagine though that a wider variety of grass height would eventually produce significant differences, but those differences may only be real at extremes unlikely to be seen at an actual field. Surface scarification and application of clay top dressing appeared to not affect things either.

Of the variables they did explore, only surface compaction significantly affected velocity loss. It is difficult to figure out the degree to which this is true because they apparently only repeated the experiment twice, which prevents many different types of statistical evaluations.

Surface Pace

Compaction

T1

T2

High

0.543

0.589

Medium

0.525

0.573

Low

0.442

0.527

What the above data suggests is that turf managers would have a hard time affecting how a ball travels. In other words, the only meaningful way to impact a batted ball on the bounce would be at the time of construction of the field or a rather intensive reconditioning of the playing field. Certainly some variables were not explored in this paper. For instance, long grass that is wetted might actually significantly impact surface pace, but that was not explored in this paper. Additionally, stories we have all heard back in the day about rather clever groundskeepers may have been possible then and not now due to more stringent expectations about playing field conditions.

Contact Camden Depot

We look forward to your questions as well as any suggestions you may have for us.

Additionally, we are always looking for new contributors, so if you want to write for the Depot then e-mail us with an example column that you think fits the tone of the site.

Contributors

Jon Shepherd - Founder/Editor@CamdenDepotStarted Camden Depot in the summer of 2007. By day, a toxicologist and by night a baseball analyst. His work is largely located on this site, but may pop up over at places like ESPN or Baseball Prospectus.

Matt Kremnitzer - Assistant Editor@mattkremnitzerMatt joined Camden Depot in early 2013. His work has been featured on ESPN SweetSpot and MASNsports.com.

Patrick Dougherty - Writer@pjd0014Patrick joined Camden Depot in the fall of 2015, following two years writing for Baltimore Sports & Life. He is interested in data analysis and forecasting, and cultivates those skills with analysis aimed at improving the performance of the Orioles (should they ever listen).

Nate Delong - Writer@OriolesPGNate created and wrote for Orioles Proving Ground prior to joining Camden Depot in the middle of 2013. His baseball resume includes working as a scorer for Baseball Info Solutions and as a Video Intern for the Baltimore Orioles. His actual resume is much less interesting.

Matt Perez - Writer@FanOfLaundryMatt joined Camden Depot after the 2013 season. He is a data analyst/programmer in his day job and uses those skills to write about the Orioles and other baseball related topics.

Joe Reisel - WriterJoe has followed the Norfolk Tides now for 20 seasons. He currently serves as a Tides GameDay datacaster for milb.com and as a scorer for Baseball Info Solutions (BIS). He is computer programmer/analyst by day.

Joe Wantz - WriterJoe is a baseball and Orioles fanatic. In his spare time, he got his PhD in political science and works in data and analytics in Washington DC.