You actually tried arguing, nice :-D I figured you wouldn't since you agreez with meez.

So anyway.

It really isn't so much about the writer as a person, but the writer as a job. They are just getting F'd in the A. In 1987 they took a "temporary" cut in their pay (by half) so that they could help the VHS push through. They were supposed to get that money back (or at least have their pay reverted back to the original amount) once VHS became successful. That never happened.

Then there is the bigger issue of whether or not they deserve money for programs on the internet (played from NBC.com, etc). Well, the companies are making a TON of money off this (billions I hear, but of course I have no proof).

Rahr. Doesn't really matter if this continues because it was only a test and It think we both agree anyway. Want some serious action? I wish we could have 3 or 4 people arguing in one debate.