On Nov 26, 7:40 am, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com>wrote:> On Nov 25, 12:53 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:>> > In article> > <8e72f34b-4acb-4e8d-9797-f3b217e4e...@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>,> > "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlay...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > > So, we know from modern particle physics that the particle, is both> > > particle, and wave.>> > What we do know is that those things we sometimes regard as being> > small-and-particle-like things have some behaviors that are wave-like.>> > What those "things"REALLY are, we do not know.>> > And most of the time, don't much care, as long as our descriptions of> > how we expect them to behave match our observations of how they do> > behave!> >>> Well that's simple, you're not a conscientious mathematician, who> cares.>

Virgil could pass for a mathematician. He doesn't use deceit to winpoints like most Cantorians, he'll try to put forward what he believesis the truth, that there are MORE THAN 1,2,3...INFINITY pointsbetween any 2 points.

It's just that his (MAINSTREAM) stance is imaginary and piecedtogether which forces him to argue from the hip, and duck and weavelike they all do!

Herc

--S: if stops(S) gosub SG. GREENE: this proves stops() must be un-computable!SCI.LOGIC