Rauner implored to take tougher stance in battle with AFSCME

Perhaps one of the most prominent stories in 2016 was Gov. Bruce Rauner’s ongoing battle with Illinois’ largest government-employee union, but how Rauner proceeds in the months to come will be critical, a political analyst said.

For months,
Rauner and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees (AFSCME), a government workers' union, have engaged in negotiations over a new contract for state
employees. There have been 24
negotiating sessions over 67 days, prompting some to wish Rauner
would take a firmer approach with AFSCME.

Patrick
Hughes, co-founder of the Illinois Opportunity Project, said Rauner is not
risk-averse, which is one of the reasons for his success in business prior to
becoming governor, but that his political advisers may be cautioning against a stronger
stance on certain issues.

“I think he
is getting advice from people who don’t want him to make a big mistake,” Hughes
said during a recent episode of “Illinois Rising,” a radio show hosted by Dan
Proft. “(They) don’t want him to take too big of a risk this far out when they
can bleed out circumstances.”

As far as
AFSCME is concerned, some believe the union has intentionally tried to stall
and hinder any progress in the negotiations.

On Nov. 15,
the Illinois Labor Relations Board declared the negotiations had reached
an impasse, meaning Illinois taxpayers would not be on the hook for an extra $3
billion over the course of the contract. It sent out the written decision on Dec.
5.

AFSCME,
however, alleged the board failed to follow proper protocol when it issued
its written decision and sought a temporary restraining order, which was issued
by St. Clair County Circuit Judge Robert LeChien on Dec. 6, preventing
Rauner from imposing his most recent best offer, which included a 100 percent
increase in health premiums, a four-year pay freeze, and provisions granting
Rauner permission to outsource public services.

A week later, the board reissued the impasse decision for
the third time within a 30-day period.

Proft said Rauner needs to take powerful stands and seek
an approach that lines up with the transformative leadership he promised during
his campaign.

“If he’s just playing the traditional game in the same
way (as) less reform-minded, less transformational-inclined Republican governors in the
past, like George Ryan, Jim Edgar and Jim Thompson…that doesn’t end well,” Proft
said.

This is a critical time for Rauner, who is up for re-election in 2018. Though he has yet to announce
his candidacy, there is speculation that billionaire philanthropist Jay Robert "J.B." Pritzker may
challenge Rauner.

“(Rauner) is going to have to show that his governance
was progressive both politically, which he has done a little bit with these
races, but aside from politically, that people’s lives are starting to or going
to improve as a consequence to the fact that he is the leader of the state,”
Hughes said.

Rauner has appealed the temporary order in the Fifth
District Court of Appeals. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Jan.
13.

Want to get notified whenever we write about
Illinois Policy Institute
?

Next time we write about
Illinois Policy Institute,
we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.