nmm 22 4500ICPSR04117MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04117MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2003
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2009-12-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4117NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04117.v2
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4117Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04117.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04370MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04370MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2004
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-10-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4370NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04370.v1
incomeicpsrimmigrationicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrcensus dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4370Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04370.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04587MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04587MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2005
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-05-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4587NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the
Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical
information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS
publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for
demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in
the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the
release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations
of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age,
relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social
characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational
attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for
children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago,
place of birth, U.S. citizenship status, year of entry, world region
of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry.
Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment
status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker,
income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing
characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure
built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year
householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel,
utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status.
The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of
Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is
mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04587.v2
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4587Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04587.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22101MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22101MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2006
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22101NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22101.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22101Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22101.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24503MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24503MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2007
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2010-02-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR24503NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24503.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24503Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24503.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29263MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29263MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2008
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2011-11-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR29263NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29263.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29263Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29263.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33802MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33802MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2009
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2013-04-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR33802NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33802.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33802Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33802.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25042MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25042MiAaIMiAaI
American Community Survey (ACS)
[electronic resource]Three-Year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2005-2007
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2010-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25042NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a part of the Decennial Census Program, and is designed to produce critical information about the characteristics of local communities. The ACS publishes social, housing, and economic characteristics for demographic groups covering a broad spectrum of geographic areas in the United States and Puerto Rico. Every year the ACS supports the release of single-year estimates for geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more. Demographic variables include sex, age, relationship, households by type, race, and Hispanic origin. Social characteristics variables include school enrollment, educational attainment, marital status, fertility, grandparents caring for children, veteran status, disability status, residence one year ago, place of birth, United States citizenship status, year of entry, world region of birth of foreign born, language spoken at home, and ancestry. Variables focusing on economic characteristics include employment status, commuting to work, occupation, industry, class of worker, income and benefits, and poverty status. Variables focusing on housing characteristics include occupancy, units in structure, year structure was built, number of rooms, number of bedrooms, housing tenure, year householder moved into unit, vehicles available, house heating fuel, utility costs, occupants per room, housing value, and mortgage status. The American Community Survey is conducted under the authority of Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141 and 193, and response is mandatory.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25042.v1
census dataicpsrcitizenshipicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsremploymenticpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrgenealogyicpsrhearing impairmenticpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrindigenous populationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrmarriageicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrmortgage paymentsicpsrphysical disabilitiesicpsrpopulationicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrpublic utilitiesicpsrraceicpsrtaxesicpsrvision impairmenticpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectICPSR I.A.5. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Community Survey SeriesFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsCCEERC II.D.2. Families and WorkCCEERC II. Parents and FamiliesDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsCCEERC II.D. Parent/Family Practices and StructureRCMD XIII. Race and EthnicityFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25042Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25042.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34689MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34689MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Survey, November #2, 2012
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2013-07-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34689NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded November, 2012, and the second of two, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked their opinions about topics such as their retrospective thoughts on the country's governance, the legality of marijuana and its proper use, holiday shopping, voting behavior and voter registration, (including that during the 2012 presidential election), and personal relationships. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, political party affiliation, political philosophy, religious preference, employment status, household income, type of residential area (e.g. urban or rural), and whether respondents thought of themselves as born again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34689.v1
ageicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrfamily sizeicpsrglobal warmingicpsropinion pollsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpoliticsicpsrpresidentsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrreligionicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrsame-sex marriageicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrincome distributionicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmarriageicpsrsexual preferenceicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrholidaysicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersCBS News60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34689Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34689.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08236MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08236MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population, 1940 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8236NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1940 Census Public Use Microdata Sample Project was
assembled through a collaborative effort between the United States
Bureau of the Census and the Center for Demography and Ecology at the
University of Wisconsin. The collection contains a stratified
1-percent sample of households, with separate records for each
household, for each "sample line" respondent, and for each person in
the household. These records were encoded from microfilm copies of
original handwritten enumeration schedules from the 1940 Census of
Population. Geographic identification of the location of the sampled
households includes Census regions and divisions, states (except
Alaska and Hawaii), standard metropolitan areas (SMAs), and state
economic areas (SEAs). Accompanying the data collection is a codebook
that includes an abstract, descriptions of sample design, processing
procedures and file structure, a data dictionary (record layout),
category code lists, and a glossary. Also included is a procedural
history of the 1940 Census. Each of the 20 subsamples contains three
record types: household, sample line, and person. Household variables
describe the location and condition of the household. The sample line
records contain variables describing demographic characteristics such
as nativity, marital status, number of children, veteran status, wage
deductions for Social Security, and occupation. Person records also
contain variables describing demographic characteristics including
nativity, marital status, family membership, education, employment
status, income, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08236.v1
census dataicpsrcensus divisionsicpsrcensus regionsicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarriageicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrmilitary serviceicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvital statisticsicpsrworkicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8236Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08236.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08251MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08251MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population, 1950 [United States]
[electronic resource]Public Use Microdata Sample
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8251NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains a stratified 1-percent sample
of households, with separate records for each household, each "sample
line" respondent, and each person in the household. These records were
encoded from microfilm copies of original handwritten enumeration
schedules from the 1950 Census of Population. Geographic
identification of the location of the sampled households includes
Census regions and divisions, states (except Alaska and Hawaii),
Standard Metropolitan Areas (SMAs), and State Economic Areas
(SEAs). The data collection was constructed from and consists of 20
independently-drawn subsamples stored in 20 discrete physical
files. The 1950 Census had both a complete-count and a sample
component. Individuals selected for the sample component were asked a
set of additional questions. Only households with a sample line person
were included in the 1950 Public Use Microdata Sample. The collection
also contains records of group quarters members who were also on the
Census sample line. Each household record contains variables
describing the location and composition of the household. The sample
line records contain variables describing demographic characteristics
such as nativity, marital status, number of children, veteran status,
education, income, and occupation. The person records contain
demographic variables such as nativity, marital status, family
membership, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08251.v1
census dataicpsrcensus divisionsicpsrcensus regionsicpsrchildrenicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrfamiliesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrmarriageicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrmilitary serviceicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulationicpsrstates (USA)icpsrvital statisticsicpsrworkicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8251Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08251.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04538MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04538MiAaIMiAaI
Chitwan Valley [Nepal] Family Study
[electronic resource]Changing Social Contexts and Family Formation
William G. Axinn
,
Arland Thornton
,
Jennifer S. Barber
,
Susan A. Murphy
,
Dirgha Ghimire
,
Thomas Fricke
,
Stephen Matthews
,
Dharma Dangol
,
Lisa Pearce
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Sundar Shrehtha
,
Douglas Massey
2014-10-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4538NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was designed to investigate the influence of changing social contexts on family formation behaviors, marriage, childbearing, and contraceptive use. The research investigates the extent to which changes in the community produce changes in family formation behavior, and whether the family organization of individual life courses produces these changes in behavior. The study used a combination of ethnographic and survey research methods to gather 171 neighborhood histories, 142 school histories, 118 health service histories, 20 bus route histories, household farming practices, family planning histories, and household composition in Western Chitwan, Nepal. Personal histories were gathered from the 5,271 individuals ages 15-59 years living in these neighborhoods using a semi-structured Life History Calendar and a highly structured survey questionnaire. The sample neighborhoods for this study were chosen to represent the five major ethnic groups inhabiting the area: high caste Hindus, hill Tibeto-Burmese (such as Gurung, Tamang, and Magar), indigenous terai Tibeto-Burmese (such as Tharu, Darai, and Kumal), Newar, and other caste Hindus. Neighborhood history calendars measured the neighborhood's distance, in terms of minutes walking, to a variety of organizations and services. Schools were defined as places of instruction for children of any age or grade. Health clinics were defined as any places of care and healing, such as doctors' offices, hospitals, and health posts. Employers were any places that employed 10 or more people for pay. Cinemas were movie theaters or halls where movies were shown. Bus stops were any places where people could obtain a ride for pay on a vehicle.
This particular study spanned 1997-2002. These data were combined with data from the Chitwan Valley Family Study 1996-1997, and the Household Agriculture and Consumption Survey 1996.
** IMPORTANT NOTE FOR STATA USERS **
The Stata files for datasets 7, 15, 16, 18, and 32 were produced in Stata 13. Users of earlier versions of Stata will not be able to read them.
There are a few options for users of Stata 12 or earlier to work around the compatibility issue:
- Upgrade to Stata 13
- Find a computer with Stata 13 and use the 'saveold' command to create a Version 12 file
- Use the latest version of a file conversion utility, such as Stat/Transfer (older versions cannot read Stata 13 files)
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04538.v8
agricultureicpsrbirth controlicpsrchild rearingicpsrchildrenicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth services utilizationicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrprenatal careicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial environmenticpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC V. Health DataICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesIDRC II. Economic DataDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthAxinn, William G.Thornton, ArlandBarber, Jennifer S.Murphy, Susan A.Ghimire, DirghaFricke, ThomasMatthews, StephenDangol, DharmaPearce, LisaBiddlecom, AnnShrehtha, SundarMassey, DouglasInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4538Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04538.v8 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31241MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31241MiAaIMiAaI
Civil Union Study 2000-2002, United States
[electronic resource]
Esther Rothblum
,
Kimberly Balsam
2014-09-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31241NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
es include age, race, education, religion, sexual orientation, income, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31241.v1
bisexualityicpsrcivil unionicpsrdomestic partnershipicpsrgay communityicpsrgay rights movementicpsrgays and lesbiansicpsrhomosexual relationshipsicpsrhomosexualityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarital relationsicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrmarriage ceremoniesicpsrsame-sex marriageicpsrsexual preferenceicpsrICPSR XVI. Social IndicatorsFENWAY III. Gay/Bisexual MenRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesFENWAY II. Lesbian/Bisexual WomenFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectRothblum, EstherBalsam, KimberlyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31241Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31241.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34719MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34719MiAaIMiAaI
Community Healthy Marriage Initiative Survey for Six Cities, 2007-2010
[electronic resource]
Robert Lerman
,
Anupa Bir
2014-10-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34719NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Community Healthy Marriage Initiative (CHMI) evaluation was designed to evaluate community-level impacts of various relationship and marriage education programs. This study compared three sites which received grant funding from the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) (Dallas, Texas; St. Louis, Missouri; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with three cities that did not receive grant-funding (Fort Worth, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; and Cleveland, Ohio) to determine what impacts grant funding has on these types of programs. This collection includes two rounds of surveys, one conducted in 2007 and one conducted in 2009, for longitudinal comparison. Respondents were asked a series of questions regarding their knowledge of relationship and marriage education programs in their area, including where they had learned of the classes, what source of advertising they had heard or seen, whether they knew where the classes were held, and whether they had discussed the classes with someone else.
Information was collected to gauge respondents' participation in these courses, including whether they had taken a class in the previous 18 months, how long they attended the courses, whether they had received other services as a result of attending the classes, and whether they had suggested the classes to someone else.
Respondents were also queried on whether they would be interested in attending a relationship class or a parenting class. Additional topics included parental relationships with their children, and relationship quality. Demographic variables include relationship status, household composition, employment status, parental status, race, age, and household income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34719.v3
child rearingicpsrchildrenicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrcounselingicpsrcounseling servicesicpsrdomestic violenceicpsreducationicpsreducational programsicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily counselingicpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily servicesicpsrfamily structureicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmarriageicpsrmarriage counselingicpsrmedia useicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparenting skillsicpsrparentsicpsrpublic housingicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial servicesicpsrsocial supporticpsrspouse abuseicpsrspousesicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderLerman, RobertBir, AnupaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34719Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34719.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32404MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32404MiAaIMiAaI
Historical Demographic Data of Southeastern Europe
[electronic resource]Orasac, 1824-1975
Joel Halpern
2013-05-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR32404NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data in the Historical Demographic Data of Southeastern Europe series derive primarily from the ethnographic and archival research of Joel M. Halpern, Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, in southeastern Europe from 1953 to 2006. The series is comprised of historical demographic data from several towns and villages in the countries of Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia, all of which are former constituent republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The data provide insight into the shift from agricultural to industrial production, as well as the more general processes of urbanization occurring in the last days of the Yugoslav state. With an expansive timeframe ranging from 1818 to 2006, the series also contains a wide cross-section of demographic data types. These include, but are not limited to, population censuses, tax records, agricultural and landholding data, birth records, death records, marriage and engagement records, and migration information.
This component of the series focuses exclusively on the Serbian village of Orasac and is composed of 64 datasets. These data record a variety of demographic and economic information between the years of 1824 and 1975. General population information at the individual level is available in official census records from 1863, 1884, 1948, 1953, and 1961, and from population register records for the years of 1928, 1966, and 1975. Census data at the household level is also available for the years of 1863, 1928, 1948, 1953, and 1961. These data are followed by detailed records of engagement and marriage. Many of these data were obtained through the courtesy of village and county officials. Priest book records from 1851 through 1966, as well as death records from 1863 to 1976 and tombstone records from 1975, are also available. Information regarding migrants and emigrants was obtained from the village council for the years of 1946 through 1975. Lastly, the data provide economic and financial information, including records of individual landholdings (for the years of 1863, 1952, 1966, and 1975), records of government taxation at the individual or household level (for 1813 through 1840, as well as for 1952), and livestock censuses (at both the individual and household level for the years of 1824 and 1825, and only at the individual level for the years of 1833 and 1834).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32404.v1
agricultural censusicpsrbirth recordsicpsrcensus dataicpsrcensusesicpsrdeath recordsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdemographyicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily sizeicpsrgendericpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincome taxicpsrland ownershipicpsrlandownersicpsrlivestock inventoriesicpsrmarriageicpsroccupationsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpopulation migrationicpsrtax recordsicpsrvital statisticsicpsrICPSR I.B. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsHalpern, JoelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32404Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32404.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04703MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04703MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2005
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Michio Nitta
,
Noriko Iwai
,
Tokio Yasuda
2007-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4703NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was designed to solicit political,
sociological, and economic information from people living in
Japan. The data were collected between August 25 and November 23,
2005, using face-to-face interviews and self-administered
questionnaires. Respondents were asked to give employment information
for themselves and their spouses, including industry, size of
employer, number of hours worked, level of job satisfaction, and time
spent commuting. Respondents were also queried regarding employment
information and education level of their parents when the respondent
was aged 15. Several questions were asked about household composition,
the type of residence, the state of respondents' finances during the
last few years and compared to other Japanese families both past and
present, sources of financial support, the ease of improving one's
standard of living in Japan, and the use of credit cards and consumer
financing. Views were also sought on divorce, the roles of each
spouse, issues involving children, the responsibility of the
government, and taxation issues. In terms of health, questions were
asked regarding the physical and mental health of respondents and
their household members, the frequency of smoking and alcohol
consumption, and their views on genetically modified foods. Quality of
life questions addressed the amount of satisfaction respondents
received from life, and how often they participated in sports,
leisure, and volunteer activities. Additional topics covered were
euthanasia, the use of technology, juvenile delinquency, car ownership
and usage, their level of trust in various institutions, and whether
respondents belonged to religious, trade, or social service
organizations. Demographic variables include age, sex, education
level, employment status, occupation, labor union membership, marital
status, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), household
income, perceived social status, political orientation, political
party affiliation, and religious affiliation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04703.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrautomobile useicpsrcareer historyicpsrcharitable donationsicpsrchildrenicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrcredit card useicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsreuthanasiaicpsrfamily historyicpsrforeignersicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrlabor unionsicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrmental healthicpsrnewspapersicpsrsocial statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrwork attitudesicpsrworkplacesicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC II. Economic DataTanioka, IchiroNitta, MichioIwai, NorikoYasuda, TokioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4703Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04703.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25181MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25181MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2006
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Noriko Iwai
,
Michio Nitta
,
Tokio Yasuda
2010-05-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25181NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was designed to solicit political,
sociological, and economic information from people living in
Japan. The data were collected between October 3 and November 3,
2006, using face-to-face interviews and self-administered
questionnaires. Respondents were asked to give employment information
for themselves and their spouses, including industry, size of
employer, number of hours worked, level of job satisfaction, and time
spent commuting. Respondents were also queried regarding employment
information and education level of their parents when the respondent
was aged 15. Several questions were asked about household composition,
the type of residence, the state of respondents' finances during the
last few years and compared to other Japanese families both past and
present, sources of financial support, the ease of improving one's
standard of living in Japan, and the use of credit cards and consumer
financing. Views were also sought on divorce, the roles of each
spouse, issues involving children, the responsibility of the
government, and taxation issues. In terms of health, questions were
asked regarding the physical and mental health of respondents and
their household members, the frequency of smoking and alcohol
consumption, and their views on genetically modified foods. Quality of
life questions addressed the amount of satisfaction respondents
received from life, and how often they participated in sports,
leisure, and volunteer activities. Additional topics covered were
euthanasia, the use of technology, juvenile delinquency, car ownership
and usage, their level of trust in various institutions, and whether
respondents belonged to religious, trade, or social service
organizations. Demographic variables include age, sex, education
level, employment status, occupation, labor union membership, marital
status, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), household
income, perceived social status, political orientation, political
party affiliation, and religious affiliation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25181.v1
trust (psychology)icpsrwork attitudesicpsrworkplacesicpsrcareer historyicpsrmental healthicpsrnewspapersicpsrsocial statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsreuthanasiaicpsrfamily historyicpsrforeignersicpsrgender rolesicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrgovernmenticpsrcharitable donationsicpsrchildrenicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrconsumer behavioricpsrcredit card useicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrjuvenile delinquencyicpsrlabor unionsicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrautomobile useicpsrmarriageicpsrIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataTanioka, IchiroIwai, NorikoNitta, MichioYasuda, TokioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25181Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25181.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30661MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30661MiAaIMiAaI
Japanese General Social Survey (JGSS), 2008
[electronic resource]
Ichiro Tanioka
,
Noriko Iwai
,
Michio Nitta
,
Tokio Yasuda
2012-03-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR30661NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Japanese General Social Surveys (JGSS) Project is a Japanese
version of the General Social Survey (GSS) project closely replicating the original GSS of the
National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. It
provides data for analyses of Japanese society, attitudes, and
behaviors, which makes possible international comparisons. The
objectives of the JGSS project are three-fold: (1) to collect and build
cumulative data on general social surveys in Japan in a regular and
consistent manner, thus enabling a time-series analysis; (2) to
provide data for secondary analyses to researchers and university
students in various social science fields; and (3) to provide data in
a format useful for international comparative studies, research, and
reports. While the survey is conducted in Japanese language alone, the
data files and codebooks are produced and deposited both in
Japanese and English.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30661.v1
social statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtechnologyicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrwork attitudesicpsrworkplacesicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrautomobile expensesicpsrautomobile useicpsrcareer historyicpsrcharitable donationsicpsrchildrenicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrconsumer behavioricpsrcredit card useicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsreuthanasiaicpsrfamily historyicpsrforeignersicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrlabor unionsicpsrleisureicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrmental healthicpsrnewspapersicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC II. Economic DataTanioka, IchiroIwai, NorikoNitta, MichioYasuda, TokioInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30661Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30661.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34664MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34664MiAaIMiAaI
Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), 2008
[electronic resource]
Sang-Wook Kim
2013-12-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34664NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Korean General Social Survey (KGSS) is the South Korean version of the General Social Survey (GSS), closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. Each round of the KGSS typically includes the topical module surveys of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), and/or the East Asian Social Survey (EASS), an international survey network of four GSS-type surveys from countries in East Asia (including China, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea). Respondents were asked for their opinions on Korean society, trust in people and institutions, politics and reunification, economic issues, social issues, and religion. Additional questions were asked about the everyday life, household, family, education, occupation, and social life of the respondents. Demographic information includes age, sex, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, political party affiliation, and political philosophy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34664.v2
voting behavioricpsrwork attitudesicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrsocial classesicpsrsocial lifeicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrabortionicpsrchildrenicpsrcorporationsicpsrcrimeicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsreconomic issuesicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrfamily sizeicpsrgender rolesicpsrglobalizationicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlabor unionsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmarriageicpsrmedia useicpsrnational prideicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical expectationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrreligionicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrreligious behavioricpsrunemploymenticpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesKim, Sang-WookInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34664Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34664.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35335MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35335MiAaIMiAaI
Korean General Social Survey (KGSS), 2012
[electronic resource]
Sang-Wook Kim
2014-10-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35335NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Korean General Social Survey (KGSS) is the South Korean version of the General Social Survey (GSS), closely replicating the original GSS of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. Each round of the KGSS typically includes the topical module surveys of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), and/or the East Asian Social Survey (EASS), an international survey network of four GSS-type surveys from countries in East Asia (including China, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea). Respondents were asked about their trust of people and institutions, their opinions about Korean society, government performance, politics and political conditions, economic conditions, and voter participation. Additional questions were asked regarding social relationships, household and personal finances, women and family matters, household and family composition, occupation, internet usage, and respondent mental health. Demographic information includes age, sex, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, political party affiliation, and political philosophy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35335.v1
economic conditionsicpsreconomic policyicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrfamily structureicpsrgendericpsrlife eventsicpsrmarriageicpsrmental healthicpsroccupationsicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrincome distributionicpsrinternet useicpsrorganizational structureicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical expectationsicpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpoliticsicpsrpsychological wellbeingicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrsocial justiceicpsrsocial statusicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocial welfareicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrwages and salariesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesKim, Sang-WookInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35335Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35335.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04698MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04698MiAaIMiAaI
Low-Fertility Cohorts Study, 1978
[electronic resource]A Survey of White, Ever-Married Women Belonging to the 1901-1910 United States Birth Cohorts
Jeanne C. Ridley
2007-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4698NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is comprised of personal interviews of white,
ever-married women born between July 1, 1900, and June 30, 1910. In
1978, a national survey of 1,049 married women between the ages of 68
and 78 were interviewed between the months of March and July in order
to investigate low fertility during the 1920s and 1930s and the women
of childbearing age during those decades. In addition to the general
purpose, the study was designed to gather information to test specific
hypotheses concerning demographic and socioeconomic differentials in
fertility, the prevalence of contraceptive practice and the methods
employed, the extent to which subfecundity and sterility may have
contributed to low fertility, and the timing patterns and childbearing
pace of the time. The interview collected information on each
respondent's family planning, contraception usage, pregnancy history,
fecundity, infertility, fertility, and maternal and infant health.
Besides demographic characteristics and background information about
the respondents, information was also gathered on their household
composition, their husband(s), marriages, and areas of residency.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04698.v1
birth controlicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily sizeicpsrfathersicpsrfertilityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrmarriageicpsrmothersicpsrpregnancyicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual behavioricpsrDSDR VII. Population Growth and DeclineICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleRidley, Jeanne C.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4698Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04698.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20840MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20840MiAaIMiAaI
Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH)
[electronic resource]
Jere R. Behrman
,
Agnes M. Chimbiri
,
Angela Chimwaza
,
Hans-Peter Kohler
,
Susan C. Watkins
2008-05-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20840NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Malawi Longitudinal Study of Families and Health (MLSFH) [previous title: Malawi Diffusion and Ideational Change Project (MDICP)] is one of very few long- standing longitudinal cohort studies in a poor Sub-Saharan African (SSA) context. It provides a rare record of more than a decade of demographic, socioeconomic, and health conditions in one of the world's poorest countries. The MLSFH cohorts were selected to represent the rural population of Malawi, where the vast majority of Malawians live in conditions that are similar to those in the rural areas of other countries with high HIV prevalence: health conditions are poor, health facilities and schools are over-burdened and under-staffed, standards of living are low and nutritional needs of adults, children and the elderly are often not met. With 7 major data collection rounds between 1998 and 2012 for up to 4,000 individuals, as well as ancillary surveys and qualitative studies, the MLSFH has been a premier dataset for research on health, family dynamics, social networks, and HIV infection risks in a rural SSA context. Providing public-use data on the socioeconomic context, demographics and health of individuals and their families in Malawi over more than a decade, the MLSFH has been the basis of more than 150 publications and working papers submitted for publication. Importantly, the MLSFH has also informed health policy discussions in Malawi and elsewhere in SSA. The MLSFH/MDICP was originally developed as a sister project of the Kenya Diffusion and Ideational Change Project (KDICP), but with a larger sample and greater geographical dispersion. Both the KDICP and the MLSFH/MDICP aimed to examine the role of social interactions in changing demographic attitudes and behavior.
The first two waves of the MLSFH data collected in 1998 and 2001 are archived and available for download at ICPSR-DSDR. The first two waves focused on two key empirical questions: the roles of social interactions in (1) the acceptance (or rejection) of modern contraceptive methods and of smaller ideal family size and (2) the diffusion of knowledge of AIDS symptoms and transmission mechanisms and the evaluation of acceptable strategies of protection against AIDS.
More information and data for all waves of the MLSFH study can be found on the MLSFH project Web site. The MLSFH Data Web site contains instructions on how individuals can currently obtain the data (6 waves, 1998-2010). The MLSFH Cohort Profile is available as a University of Pennsylvania Population Studies Center (PSC) Working Paper. This cohort profile is the main documentation for the general study design, sampling framework, etc., and it summarizes some key findings as well.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20840.v1
AIDSicpsrbirth controlicpsrbirth expectationsicpsrcommunicable diseasesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth statusicpsrHIVicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhusbandsicpsrlivestockicpsrlivestock incomeicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrremarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial lifeicpsrsocial networksicpsrspousesicpsrtraditional healersicpsrwivesicpsrDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderBehrman, Jere R.Chimbiri, Agnes M.Chimwaza, AngelaKohler, Hans-PeterWatkins, Susan C.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20840Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20840.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29582MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29582MiAaIMiAaI
Marriage Matters Panel Survey of Newlywed Couples, 1998-2004, Louisiana
[electronic resource]
Steven L. Nock
,
Laura A. Sanchez
,
James D. Wright
2012-06-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR29582NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
In 1997, Louisiana enacted a covenant marriage law which gave couples an alternative to a conventional marriage license. By requiring premarital counseling and proof of fault for a subsequent divorce, along with other features, covenant marriages were intended to be more difficult both to enter and to exit. The Marriage Matters panel survey was designed to examine the effects of covenant marriage on rates of marital dissolution, relationship quality, and other outcomes. The data were collected in three waves. Wave 1 was collected approximately 3 to 6 months after marriage. Respondents were asked questions about their recent marriage, the time leading up to their recent marriage, premarital counseling, convenant marriage, previous marriages, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, satisfaction in marriage, household responsibilities, their background, health and happiness, their social and political views, and about the questionnaire itself. Wave 2 was administered approximately 18 months after the first wave. The second wave queried respondents on their marriage today, their views on marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. Wave 3 was administered 12 to 24 months after the second wave. Respondents answered questions on their marriage today, views about marriage and divorce in general, their religious views, household responsibilities, satisfaction in marriage, the celebration of holidays, convenant marriage, biological and adopted children, feelings about children, problems in their marriage, advice and counseling, their health and happiness, employment, housing, and income, household composition, and their social and political views. In the divorce questionnaire, the following topics were addressed: how things stand at the moment, feelings about their marriage, arguments during their marriage, social life since the separation or divorce, their health and well-being, moving to a divorce agreement, advice and counseling, the divorce process and convenant marriage, and household income the year before and after the separation. Demographic information collected across all three waves includes: age, gender, religious participation, employment status, education level, number of children birthed or adopted, household composition, and household income. Demographic information collected in Wave 1 only includes: race, religious affiliation, number of previous marriages, and political affiliation. Demographic information collected through the divorce questionnaire includes: gender, marital status, and personal and partner income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1
adulteryicpsrchildrenicpsrconflict resolutionicpsrdating (social)icpsrdivorceicpsrdomestic responsibilitiesicpsrdomestic violenceicpsreducational backgroundicpsremploymenticpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily relationsicpsrhealthicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmarital relationsicpsrmarital satisfactionicpsrmarital statusicpsrmarriageicpsrmarriage ceremoniesicpsrmarriage counselingicpsrmental healthicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrreligious beliefsicpsrremarriageicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial valuesicpsrspousesicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderNock, Steven L.Sanchez, Laura A.Wright, James D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29582Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29582.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21600MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21600MiAaIMiAaI
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [Public Use]
[electronic resource]
Kathleen Mullan Harris
,
J. Richard Udry
2014-05-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21600NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994-2008 [Public Use] is a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-1995 school year. The Add Health cohort has been followed into young adulthood with four in-home interviews, the most recent in 2008, when the sample was aged 24-32. Add Health combines longitudinal survey data on respondents' social, economic, psychological and physical well-being with contextual data on the family, neighborhood, community, school, friendships, peer groups, and romantic relationships, providing unique opportunities to study how social environments and behaviors in adolescence are linked to health and achievement outcomes in young adulthood.
Public use biomarker data has been added. The Glucose/HbA1c data file contains two measures of glucose homeostasis based on assays of the Wave IV dried blood spots: Glucose (mg/dl) and
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, %). Six additional constructed measures -- fasting duration, classification of fasting glucose, classification of non-fasting glucose, classification of HbA1c, diabetes medication, and a joint classification of glucose, HbA1c, self-reported history of diabetes, and anti-diabetic medication use -- are also included.
Public use Lipids biomarker data has been added. The Lipids data file contains measures of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total-cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, self-reported antihyperlipidemic medication use, joint classification of self-reported history of hyperlipidemia and antihyperlipidemic medication use, fasting duration.
A restricted version of Add Health is available. See National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994-2008, Restricted Data Series.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21600.v15
academic achievementicpsradolescentsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsrbiomarkersicpsrbirth controlicpsrclassroom environmenticpsrdating (social)icpsrdiabetesicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug useicpsreating habitsicpsreducational environmenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrphysical characteristicsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical fitnessicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrpublic assistance programsicpsrreligious behavioricpsrreligious beliefsicpsrreproductive historyicpsrschool attendanceicpsrself concepticpsrself esteemicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsocial environmenticpsrsocial networksicpsrtobacco useicpsrviolenceicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhealthicpsrhealth behavioricpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesFENWAY V. Same-Sex Families and CouplesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderHarris, Kathleen MullanUdry, J. RichardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21600Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21600.v15 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22408MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22408MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2004
[electronic resource]Burkina Faso
Christine Ouedraogo
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22408NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescents' abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The survey in Burkina Faso was administered between April and June 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 5,400 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. This process collected 6,489 individual interviews with adolescents. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22408.v1
risk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrabortionicpsradolescentsicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR III. Health and MortalityOuedraogo, ChristineBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22408Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22408.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22409MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22409MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2004
[electronic resource]Ghana
Kofi Awusabo-Asare
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22409NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, and economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescentsi abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The Ghanian portion was administered between January and May 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 9,445 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. This process collected 4,430 individual interviews with adolescents. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired up by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22409.v1
AIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrabortionicpsradolescentsicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesUCC I. University of Cape Coast Centre for Data Archiving, Management, Analysis and Advocacy (DAMAA)Awusabo-Asare, KofiBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22409Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22409.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22410MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22410MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2004
[electronic resource]Malawi
Alister Munthali
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22410NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescents' abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The survey in Malawi was administered between March and June 2004 and again in August 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 7,750 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. However, during the initial data collection period this process collected only 3,448 individual interviews with adolescents. Consequently, in August 2004, researchers extended the surveys to additional clusters excluded during the first round of surveys bringing the total number of individuals to 4,879. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired up by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22410.v1
abortionicpsradolescentsicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesMunthali, AlisterBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22410Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22410.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22411MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22411MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Adolescents, 2005
[electronic resource]Uganda
Stella Neema
,
Ann Biddlecom
,
Eliya Zulu
2008-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22411NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey Adolescents was launched in 2004 in four Sub-Saharan African countries--Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, and Uganda--to provide detailed information on adolescent risk-taking and health-seeking behavior as related to HIV, STDs and unintended pregnancy. The study examined a range of factors (e.g., behavioral, sociocultural, economic) that could lead to increased vulnerability to risk. The study also encompassed knowledge of means of prevention, sources of trusted information and health care, and impediments to adolescentsi abilities to apply their knowledge and take preventive action. The Ugandan portion was administered between February and July 2004. Using a two-stage stratified sample design that selected households from rural and urban clusters, 7,106 households were listed for initial screening. After an initial interview in each household, individual surveys were administered in person to adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 who were de facto or de jure members of the household. This process collected 6,659 individual interviews with adolescents. Because of the sensitive nature of questions administered in the survey, informed consent forms were obtained from both parents/guardians and the respondents, and in all possible instances interviewers and respondents were paired up by gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22411.v1
abortionicpsradolescentsicpsrAIDSicpsrbirthicpsrbirth controlicpsrdating (social)icpsrdomestic partnershipicpsreducationicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrfamily planningicpsrfertilityicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrhealth educationicpsrhousehold appliancesicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhouseholdsicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrmarriageicpsrreproductive historyicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex educationicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual awarenessicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsexual exploitationicpsrsexual reproductionicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrteenage parentsicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR III. Health and MortalityDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsICPSR XVII.C.2. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthNeema, StellaBiddlecom, AnnZulu, EliyaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22411Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22411.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20501MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20501MiAaIMiAaI
Polish General Social Survey, 1992-2002
[electronic resource]
Bogdan Cichomski
,
Tomasz Jerzynski
,
Marcin Zielinski
2007-10-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20501NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Polish General Social Survey (PGSS), conducted annually
since 1992 through 1995 and later biennially, is designed to measure
opinions and social characteristics of the Polish society. PGSS core
variables include socioeconomic and demographic items with an emphasis
on stratification measures (occupation, labor force status, education,
income) of respondents and their spouses and parents. In addition,
there are attitudinal variables concerning politics and ideology,
national spending, religious beliefs, social inequality, job and
occupational values, tolerance, educational values, other countries,
traditional sex roles, family issues, abortion, and homosexuality.
Other variables gauge subjective well-being, social class
identification, satisfaction with different spheres of life, and
confidence in public institutions. Respondents were also queried about
their voting behavior, social interactions, religiosity, health,
smoking, and drinking. Each year, additional topical modules of
questions from the International Social Survey Program have been
added: "Social Inequality" (1992 and 1999), "Environment" (1993),
"Family and Changing Gender Roles" (1994 and 2002), "Sexual Behavior"
(1994), "National Identity" (1995), "Work Orientations II" (1997),
and "Social Relations and Support Systems" (2002). This study is a
continuation of the POLISH GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEY, 1992-1999 (ICPSR
3487).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20501.v1
abortionicpsrattitudesicpsrchild rearingicpsrchildrenicpsrcivil rightsicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdurable goodsicpsreducationicpsremploymenticpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily work relationshipicpsrforeign languagesicpsrfriendshipsicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrhealthicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhomosexualityicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrjob satisfactionicpsrjob skillsicpsrlabor (work)icpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmarriageicpsrmass mediaicpsrmembershipsicpsrmenicpsrmoralityicpsrnews mediaicpsroccupationsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrreligious attitudesicpsrreligious behavioricpsrself evaluationicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsmokingicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial supporticpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrtaxesicpsrtoleranceicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoting behavioricpsrwork attitudesicpsrworking womenicpsrFENWAY I. Fenway Archive ProjectIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC V. Health DataCichomski, BogdanJerzynski, TomaszZielinski, MarcinInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20501Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20501.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34420MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34420MiAaIMiAaI
Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation
[electronic resource]Eight Sites within the United States, 2003-2013
JoAnn Hsueh
,
Virginia Knox
2014-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34420NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Supporting Healthy Marriage (SHM) evaluation was launched in 2003 to develop, to implement, and to test the effectiveness of a program aimed at strengthening low-income couples' marriages as one approach for supporting stable and nurturing family environments and parents' and children's well-being. The evaluation was led by MDRC and was sponsored by the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the Administration for Children and Families, United States Department of Health and Human Services.The SHM program was a voluntary yearlong marriage education program for low-income married couples who had children or were expecting a child. The program provided a series of group workshops based on structured curricula designed to enhance couples' relationships; supplemental activities to build on workshop themes; and family support services to address participation barriers, connect families with other services, and reinforce curricular themes.
The study sample consists of 6,298 couples (12,596 adult sample members) who were expecting a child or had a child under 18 years old at the time of study entry. The sample consists primarily of low-to-modest income, married couples with diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. In each family, one child was randomly selected to be the focus of any child-related measures gathered in the data collection activities. These children ranged from pre-birth to 14 years old at the time of enrollment in the study. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 12 and 30 months after baseline data collection. More detail is provided in the study documentation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34420.v2
familiesicpsrfamily structureicpsrhealth attitudesicpsrchild developmenticpsrchild rearingicpsrchild welfareicpsrchildhoodicpsrchildrenicpsrdivorceicpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug useicpsremploymenticpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrlanguageicpsrmarriageicpsrmarriage counselingicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrparenting skillsicpsrpoverty programsicpsrpregnancyicpsrsocial behavioricpsrwork experienceicpsrworking hoursicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsHsueh, JoAnnKnox, VirginiaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34420Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34420.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03800MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03800MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Aging and Intergenerational Relations in Baoding City [China], 1994
[electronic resource]
Martin K. Whyte
,
Yang Shanhua
,
Xiao Zhenyu
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3800NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on the
intergenerational relation and exchanges between parents and adult
children in three major urban districts of Baoding City, China, in
1994. Data are provided on demographic, social, and family
characteristics. General areas of investigation include geographic
distance and frequency of visits between parents and children, the
family decision-making process, deference accorded to elders, use of
corporal punishment on children, family's involvement in the selection
of a child's marital partner, history of mental illness, political
arrest, and deaths in the family, differences in lifestyles and ideas
between parents and children, parents' living arrangements with adult
child's family and its benefits and disadvantages, social engagements
such as attendance at political meetings, religious activities,
volunteer work, and theater outings, work and retirement history, and
opinions on gender equity and individualism. The Baoding Parent Data
file (Part 1) provides information on the health status, physical
fitness, and daily activities of respondents. Respondents' history of
hospitalization, depression, and mental illness, as well as their
smoking and drinking habits and coping mechanisms are included. Other
variables describe respondents' relations with their family, including
financial, emotional, and housing support, and physical care received
from family and others. The Baoding Child Data file (Part 2) provides
information on respondents' history of relations with their parents,
frequency of visits to their parents and parents-in-law, their share
in parents' care, financial assistance provided to and by parents,
other assistance provided to them by their parents, such as child care
and help with household chores, and their relationships with their
parents-in-law and siblings. Also included are items on respondents'
feelings about their own and their spouse's health conditions, elderly
parents living with them, and nepotism in China. Additional items
include respondents' opinions on issues such as the care of the
elderly, family size, husband's role in the family, differential roles
of female and male children, risk-taking, individualism, premarital
sex, and the relative importance of career and care of parents,
friends and family, public and private ownership, and mental and
manual labor. Demographic items specify date and place of birth, age,
gender, occupation, work history, marital status, number of children,
number of times married, education, political party membership,
leadership positions, income, family social status, religion, length
of stay in Baoding, nationality, home ownership, and housing
characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03800.v1
adult childrenicpsragingicpsrcaregiversicpsrchild careicpsrcorporal punishmenticpsrextended familiesicpsrfamily conflicticpsrfamily historyicpsrfamily lifeicpsrfamily relationsicpsrgender rolesicpsrhealth statusicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrintergenerational relationsicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrolder adultsicpsrpremarital sexicpsrICPSR XVII.D. Social Institutions and Behavior, Age and the Life CycleIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsNACDA IV. Psychological Characteristics, Mental Health, and Well-Being of Older AdultsWhyte, Martin K.Shanhua, YangZhenyu, XiaoInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3800Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03800.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07443MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07443MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of Consumer Finances, 1963
[electronic resource]
University of Michigan. Survey Research Center. Economic Behavior Program
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7443NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is one in a series of financial
surveys of consumers conducted annually since 1946. In a nationally
representative sample, the head of each spending unit (usually the
husband, the main earner, or the owner of the home) was
interviewed. The basic unit of reference in the study was the spending
unit, but some family data are also available. The questions in the
1963 survey covered the respondent's attitudes toward national
economic conditions and price activity, as well as the respondent's
own financial situation. Other questions examined the spending unit
head's occupation, and the nature and amount of the spending unit's
income, debts, liquid assets, changes in liquid assets, savings,
investment preferences, and actual and expected purchases of cars and
other major durables. In addition, the survey explored in detail the
subject of housing, e.g., previous and present home ownership, value
of respondent's dwelling, and mortgage information. The survey also
gathered detailed information on marriage, family, and family
planning. Personal data include number of people in the spending unit,
age, sex, and education of the head, and the race and sex of the
respondent.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07443.v2
household incomeicpsrbusiness conditionsicpsrhousingicpsrincome distributionicpsrjob historyicpsrmarriageicpsrmortgagesicpsrnational economyicpsroccupationsicpsrpersonal debticpsrpersonal financesicpsrpricesicpsrconsumer attitudesicpsrsavingsicpsrconsumer behavioricpsrconsumer expectationsicpsrconsumer expendituresicpsrdebticpsrdisposable incomeicpsrdurable goodsicpsrhousehold expendituresicpsrautomobile ownershipicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfinancial assetsicpsrfinancial balancesicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousehold budgetsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrRCMD XII. Public OpinionICPSR IV.A. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Continuing Series of Consumer SurveysRCMD XI. Poverty and IncomeNACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older AdultsUniversity of Michigan. Survey Research Center. Economic Behavior ProgramInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7443Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07443.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04679MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04679MiAaIMiAaI
Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS)
[electronic resource]Wave 1, 2001
Peggy C. Giordano
,
Monica A. Longmore
,
Wendy D. Manning
2011-09-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4679NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study explores the relationship qualities and the
subjective meanings that motivate adolescent behavior. More
specifically, this study seeks to examine the nature and meaning of
adolescent relationship experiences (e.g., with family, peers, and
dating partners) in an effort to discover how experiences associated
with age, gender, race, and ethnicity influence the meaning of dating
relationships. The study further investigates the relative impact of
dating partners and peers on sexual behavior and contraceptive
practices, as well as involvement in other problem behaviors that can
contribute independently to sexual risk taking. The longitudinal
design of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) includes a
schedule of follow-up interviews occurring one, three, and five years
after the initial interview. Three waves of data have been collected
(2001, 2002, and 2004) and a fourth wave is scheduled for collection
(2006). Data were collected from adolescent respondents through
structured in-home interviews utilizing laptop computers. In-depth
interviews were conducted at the first wave with a subsample (n=100)
of the respondents. Parent data was collected via a short,
self-administered questionnaire at the first wave.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04679.v1
family relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrneighborhoodsicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsradolescentsicpsrbirth controlicpsrcontraceptionicpsrdating (social)icpsreducational environmenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsGiordano, Peggy C.Longmore, Monica A.Manning, Wendy D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4679Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04679.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32081MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32081MiAaIMiAaI
Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS)
[electronic resource]Wave 2, 2002
Peggy C. Giordano
,
Monica A. Longmore
,
Wendy D. Manning
2011-10-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32081NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study explores the relationship qualities and the
subjective meanings that motivate adolescent behavior. More
specifically, this study seeks to examine the nature and meaning of
adolescent relationship experiences (e.g., with family, peers, and
dating partners) in an effort to discover how experiences associated
with age, gender, race, and ethnicity influence the meaning of dating
relationships. The study further investigates the relative impact of
dating partners and peers on sexual behavior and contraceptive
practices, as well as involvement in other problem behaviors that can
contribute independently to sexual risk taking. The longitudinal
design of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) includes a
schedule of follow-up interviews occurring one, three, and five years
after the initial interview. Three waves of data have been collected
(2001, 2002, and 2004) and a fourth wave is scheduled for collection
(2006). Data were collected from adolescent respondents through
structured in-home interviews utilizing laptop computers. In-depth
interviews were conducted at the first wave with a subsample (n=100)
of the respondents. Parent data was collected via a short,
self-administered questionnaire at the first wave.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32081.v1
neighborhoodsicpsrparent child relationshipicpsrparental attitudesicpsrparental influenceicpsrsexual attitudesicpsrsexual behavioricpsrsocial environmenticpsradolescentsicpsrbirth controlicpsrcontraceptionicpsrdating (social)icpsreducational environmenticpsrfamiliesicpsrfamily planningicpsrfamily relationshipsicpsrfamily structureicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrmarriageicpsrneighborhood characteristicsicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.C. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and YouthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR I. Fertility, Family Planning, Sexual Behavior, and Reproductive HealthDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.H. Social Institutions and Behavior, Family and GenderDSDR XII. Childhood ObesityDSDR IV. Marriage, Family, Households, and UnionsGiordano, Peggy C.Longmore, Monica A.Manning, Wendy D.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32081Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32081.v1