Family Court Judges Challenged

Collusion: The Family Court has the
appearance of a Court of Collusion rather than of Justice,
as a result of its secrecy. The calls for secrecy come only
from the Judiciary, not from the children or their families.
The recent letter from Family Court Lawyers suggests that
normal rules of justice should be cast aside because this
Court ‘..is not a Criminal Court’. Criminal charges are
often involved, and fathers are sentenced to anger
management, and the fates of families are decreed based only
on malicious allegations. Due process of Justice is not to
be set aside for the justice of the lynch mob in this most
important of Courts.

The Lawyers paint a reassuring
picture of Judge and lawyers working (or colluding) together
for the good of the children- as determined by them. At
North Shore Men’s Center we find that fathers who represent
themselves frequently achieve better outcomes for their
children than fathers who employ Lawyers. Fathers are
prepared to put their case strongly, and to challenge false
information, and question the so-called ‘professionals- the
report writers and social workers. A case it seems of the
Lawyers having fools for clients.

It took a father,
representing himself, (I am not allowed to name the case
because of privacy!) to show that the accepted practice of
awarding Custody to one parent, when there are two fit and
willing parents, is in breach of the Guardianship laws, and
is legally Kidnap! His argument was upheld by the judge, and
should serve as a guide in future cases (assuming that
Family Court Lawyers still refer to case law!).

Many cases
hinge on supposedly independent and impartial reports by
“Professionals”- Specialist report writers, CYF social
workers etc. The reputation of CYF speaks for itself. The
Specialist report writers claim to be impartial, and
independent- however recently held a closed, secret meeting
together with Family Court Lawyers, to hear an address by
Julia Tolmie on the threat from the “Father’s Rights
Movement”. I actually attended that meeting and was appalled
at the degree to which fatherhood was condemned, the degree
of consensus on the need to remove fathers from families,
and the one- sided, purpose built ‘research’ used to justify
this. If these people were independent and impartial as they
claim, they would hold seminars on the threat from Radical
Feminism, and refer to the huge body of reputable research
available through the Fathers and Parents movements
throughout the world. The ‘professionals’ are in denial of
the facts that- A Women carry out most abuse of children.
B The safest place for children is with the protection of
their natural father. These ‘Professionals” in collusion
with Lawyers and Judges, in secret Court sessions, are
imposing their radical feminist ideologies onto our
children.

At North Shore Men’s Center we deal with the
tragic fall-out of these cases- not only men and fathers but
increasing numbers of mothers and grandparents attend our
weekly meetings. We provide practical help, not
indoctrination. If certain Lawyers and Judges and report
writers names come up repeatedly for abusing their
positions- then who are we to defend them?

Outcomes- In
New Zealand we give the message that a woman owns her
children. We give the message that she alone can dispose of
them at her whim, without regard for fathers and other
family members. In New Zealand we glorify the family
‘diversity’ which puts children at the greatest risk of
abuse. In New Zealand we justify this amputation of the
fathering relationship creating the myth of Father violence.
In the 20 years that the family Court has existed, New
Zealand has progressed from a great place to raise children,
to a child abuse hell. If New Zealand has a future- it is
with open family courts, return of due legal process,
presumption of equal shared parenting, and dismantling of
the multi- million dollar father removal industry.

In response to the challenges facing Scoop and the media industry we’ve instituted an Ethical Paywall to keep the news freely available to the public.
People who use Scoop for work need to be licensed through a ScoopPro subscription under this model, they also get access to exclusive news tools.

Last week, we all owed a vote of thanks to Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad for breaking with protocol during his bilateral meeting in Singapore with New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern. Reportedly, Mahathir used the photo opportunity phase of the meeting – which usually involves just an exchange of smiles and pleasantries before the media is sent out of the room – to launch into matters of genuine substance.

By doing so, Mahathir usefully exposed how New Zealand is trying to make a virtue out of sitting on the fence over the South China Sea dispute. More>>

At the invitation of the Right Honourable Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, His Excellency the President of the Republic of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, undertook a State Visit to New Zealand on 19 November 2018... More>>

One hundred and fifty academics and researchers from around Aotearoa, including Dame Anne Salmond, Emeriti Professors and several Fellows of the Royal Society, have signed a strongly-worded open letter to the Government demanding bold and urgent action to tackle climate change. More>>

“Moving towards 100 percent qualified teachers in early childhood education centres and improving adult:child ratios are among some of the key proposals for change put forward by the sector and experts in the new draft ten year strategic plan for early learning,” Chris Hipkins said. More>>

“Dame Annette King needs no introduction given her long running career as a parliamentarian where she has previously held a number senior Cabinet portfolios, including Justice, Police and Health. She also was Parliament’s longest serving female MP with 30 years’ service,” said Mr Peters. More>>