Update from the customer:
Call today with Stephen Pierce conversation
The customer wanted to inform the bug engineers that they are completely satisfied with the patches they have implemented in their environment. The question moving forward in this bug would be what are we (RedHat) going to do to provide this as a supported configuration?
1. Offer an exception
2. backport the patches into an OSP update
The customer has stated they would like to get an official package from RedHat for these changes that way there is no question on supportability.
Can someone on here provide an action plan for the best proposed outcome?
Thanks.
Taylor Clevenger
Platform TAM

So I wanted to backport this patch to Juno : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157516/5 , but not only does the "glanceclient/v1/images.py" file exist in rhos-6.0-patches, nor does the "paginate" function that this patch fixes. Flavio, do you know whether this feature used to be somewhere else in the code?
As for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156975/1 , I have a similar issue : the code is so different in Juno that I even wonder whether the patched feature existed back then. Flavio, WDYT?

If the feature doesn't exist and the backport is too invasive, I'd recommend not doing it (as you also hinted). The key thing is to make sure the backport won't break the current release.
It is possible the feature doesn't exist in early versions of glanceclient.

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1213

Note

You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.