Apollo 11 work and no play makes Stanley a dull boy

There are links in this website, the Moon Anomalies page. There is direct evidence that at least 50% of the landing was completely fake, it was all physical and photographic evidence. For ecample, they claimed at one point that they damaged their golf cart type vehicle and when they showed a picture of the vehicle there were not any tracks leading to the area or away, so that suggested that the rover was planted "there", which was not actually the moon, most likely their vacuum chamber. There is also evidence that they cover up the moons actual color, the moon is actually very green, brown, and other colors... So the truth is, the moon landing was most likely fake, or something happened during that mission that compelled them to lie about it instead of admitting defeat. Given the fact that out government enjoys lyiing about things, it wouldn't surprise me if they wanted to make the biggest lie ever told, that to them is far more fascinating than actually landing on the moon.

I was always very critical of the moon landings because of the lack of radiation shielding on the Apollo spacecraft. After all my research I believe that it is much more probable that Apollo 11 did go to the moon and the lie was to the crew when NASA told them that the gold tinfoil would actually keep them safe from cosmic radiation.

There are links in this website, the Moon Anomalies page. There is direct evidence that at least 50% of the landing was completely fake, it was all physical and photographic evidence. For ecample, they claimed at one point that they damaged their golf cart type vehicle and when they showed a picture of the vehicle there were not any tracks leading to the area or away, so that suggested that the rover was planted "there", which was not actually the moon, most likely their vacuum chamber. There is also evidence that they cover up the moons actual color, the moon is actually very green, brown, and other colors... So the truth is, the moon landing was most likely fake, or something happened during that mission that compelled them to lie about it instead of admitting defeat. Given the fact that out government enjoys lyiing about things, it wouldn't surprise me if they wanted to make the biggest lie ever told, that to them is far more fascinating than actually landing on the moon.

I was always very critical of the moon landings because of the lack of radiation shielding on the Apollo spacecraft. After all my research I believe that it is much more probable that Apollo 11 did go to the moon and the lie was to the crew when NASA told them that the gold tinfoil would actually keep them safe from cosmic radiation.

I can see your point there about what the real lie is, after all, the government would be more interested in all the tax money NASA acquires, and human life is expedible - so what if a few astronauts die - look at the billions of dollars it netted us!

Whatever you guys are smoking must be pretty good. When was the last time that you even approached a magazine on astrophotography? When was the last time that you read about the various countries and their space programs? How about, when was the last time you heard that the Indian Space program and the Japanese space Probes had confirmed the moon landing junk left behind?By the way, I have been observing the moon and planets since I was a kid, and in all those years I have never seen the moon in any shades other than varying shades of gray.If this people did not land on the moon, where did the moon rocks come from? And by the way, yes any citizen can ask to see them, you just have to know how.I can't wait till next year someone discovers that the rovers did not go to Mars and that all the pictures are CGI. The company I work for vested milliions into ensuring that this things were real and operational, since the true profit would come from other agencies wanting what we were actually making happen.