isabel marant boot

isabel marant boot ﻿Anaesthetic gases could have same effect on climate as a million cars

The substances studied in the new analysis are related to a refrigerant that will be banned across Europe from next month as it is 1,300 times more potent than CO2.

Profe isabel marant boot ssor Ole John Nielsen of Copenhagen found that sevoflurane and desflurane, two of the most commonly used anaesthetic gases, are 210 and 510 times more powerful than carbon dioxide respectively.

A third gas, isoflurane, is 1,620 times more potent than carbon dioxide, the most important greenhouse gas due to its dangerous effect on the Earths atmosphere through fossil fuel emissions. colleagues at Nasa and the Ford Atmospheric laboratories, said: We studied these different gases in regular use for anaesthesia and theyre not equally harmful.

This ought to make anaesthesiologists sit up and take notic isabel marant boot e.

If all three compounds have equal therapeutic work, there is every reason to choose the one with the lowest global warming potential.

Dr Benny Peiser, of the sceptical Global Warming Policy Foundation, said of the research: Just as cheap fossil fuels will remain the lifeblood of the world economy, stability isabel marant boot and growth, we cannot give up on anaesthetic gases just because they are very potent greenhouse gases.

The sooner people begin to accept the hard realities of what drives modern society and secures modern medical treatment, the better.

Though potent, the gases need not be banned, Professor Nielsen stressed, due to the small amounts used.

He added: The surprising properties of anaesthetic gases are an important reminder top anyone who is using any kind of gases.

They really ought to examine the atmospheric fate of them, before releading them into nature.

And yet more below this post and above my last.

Another poster writes: Oh God, will this scaremongering climate change stupidity ever stop?. Where is the scaremongering? The scientist behind the work says If all three compounds have equal therapeutic work, there is every reason to choose the one with the lowest global warming potential. and Though potent, the gases need not be banned, Professor Nielsen stressed, due to the small amounts used.. OMG what scaremongering.

These articles server a very useful purpose. The constant addition of ridiculous fear mongering publicity like this just confirms for most people that the underlying science is a money scam. The earth has warmed and cooled many times, and probably will continue to do so. Life on earth has adapted before and will again.

If the flow of research dollars that are available to pay any one who is willing to confirm that global warming needs carbon taxes was shut off, no more of this kind of drivel would appear.

And yet more below this post and above my last.

Another poster writes: Oh God, will this scaremongering climate change stupidity ever stop?. Where is the scaremongering? The scientist behind the work says If all three compounds have equal therapeutic work, there is every reason to choose the one with the lowest global warming potential. and Though potent, the gases need not be banned, Professor Nielsen stressed, due to the small amounts used.. OMG what scaremongering.

did the commenters below me even bother reading the article which states Though potent, the gases need not be banned, Professor Nielsen stressed, due to the small amounts used. isabel marant boot