The Portal Post (Comments)https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/feed/comments/atom2009-06-10T04:15:55+00:00Apache Rollerhttps://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/portal_at_cec_2007_in#comment-1238061983000Re: Portal at CEC 2007 in Las Vegassac ekimi2009-03-26T10:06:23+00:002009-03-26T10:06:23+00:00
<p>OpenPortal and Portal Server 7.2 - Architectural Overview</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_2_0_fcs_binary#comment-1235339492000Re: WSRP 2.0 FCS binaryRajesh T2009-02-22T21:51:32+00:002009-02-22T21:51:32+00:00
<p>Thanks for the wishes Atul</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_2_0_fcs_binary#comment-1235216959000Re: WSRP 2.0 FCS binaryAtul Batra2009-02-21T11:49:19+00:002009-02-21T11:49:19+00:00
<p>Congratulations to the entire team!</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/portal_server_7_2_released#comment-1235102394000Re: Portal Server 7.2 ReleasedMufasa2009-02-20T03:59:54+00:002009-02-20T03:59:54+00:00
<p>Hi </p>
<p>We are faced with a tough decission to make regarding implementing Sun Java Systems Portal Server 7.2 session failover. We would like to use in-memory replication for Sun Portal 7.2 on Glassfish V2 enterprise, there is no reference architecture for this all we can find is HADB use. This is for one of our major customers.</p>
<p>Could you please advise if going the in-memory replication would be a good idea and has this been tried anywhere else?</p>
<p>Thank you </p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/openportal_at_glassfish_day_in#comment-1234854423000Re: OpenPortal at Glassfish day in Beijingbursa evden eve nakliyat2009-02-17T07:07:03+00:002009-02-17T07:07:03+00:00
<p>thakn you</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/sun_glassfish_web_space_server#comment-1234673693000Re: Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0: Now Available!Chris Powell2009-02-15T04:54:53+00:002009-02-15T04:54:53+00:00
<p>&quot;...community support forums...&quot; Where are these please?</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/bea_s_state_of_the#comment-1234633564000Re: BEA's State of the Portal Market Reportdizi-izletv.com2009-02-14T17:46:04+00:002009-02-14T17:46:04+00:00
<p>thanz for you its great article</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/sun_glassfish_web_space_server#comment-1234440604000Re: Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0: Now Available!James Falkner2009-02-12T12:10:04+00:002009-02-12T12:10:04+00:00
<p>Pius, there will be more community and milestone builds, just as there were leading up this 10.0 commercial release. We intend to keep the same cadence that we had prior to the commercial release. These community builds will continue to be based on Liferay 5.2.x.</p>
<p>Andreas, we are considering this. But as you know we are based on Liferay, which is already open source, and most of our additions are in the form of contributions and bugfixes to that, from several sun-led open source projects (portlet container, wsrp, ruon, etc), plus a couple of small changes. So the vast majority is open source already, in various places.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/sun_glassfish_web_space_server#comment-1234439740000Re: Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0: Now Available!Pius2009-02-12T11:55:40+00:002009-02-12T11:55:40+00:00
<p>It's clear that Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0 is NOT a community build. Are we expecting any further community builds soon or should we fall back to the Liferay Community Builds?</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/sun_glassfish_web_space_server#comment-1234438816000Re: Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0: Now Available!Andreas Kuckartz2009-02-12T11:40:16+00:002009-02-12T11:40:16+00:00
<p>Will there be an Open Source version of GlassFish Web Space Server ?</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/sun_glassfish_web_space_server#comment-1234247083000Re: Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0: Now Available!James Falkner2009-02-10T06:24:43+00:002009-02-10T06:24:43+00:00
<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>No, WebSynergy MS4 is not the final build. There have been several improvements/additions/bugfixes since then.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/sun_glassfish_web_space_server#comment-1234246873000Re: Sun GlassFish Web Space Server 10.0: Now Available!Dennis2009-02-10T06:21:13+00:002009-02-10T06:21:13+00:00
<p>Thanks. Question: is Websynergy milestone4 = final?</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/ruby_on_rails_portlet_on#comment-1233979255000Re: Ruby on Rails Portlet on OpenPortal Portlet ContainerMikael Lammentausta2009-02-07T04:00:55+00:002009-02-07T04:00:55+00:00
<p>Also see <a href="http://rails-portlet.rubyforge.org/" rel="nofollow">http://rails-portlet.rubyforge.org/</a></p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/portal_server_7_samples#comment-1233926485000Re: Portal Server 7 Samples Screencastguest2009-02-06T13:21:25+00:002009-02-06T13:21:25+00:00
<p>test test test</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/openportal_at_glassfish_day_in#comment-1233839000000Re: OpenPortal at Glassfish day in Beijingmirc2009-02-05T13:03:20+00:002009-02-05T13:03:20+00:00
<p>Thanks</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/relocating_websynergy_installations#comment-1233011115000Re: Relocating WebSynergy InstallationsRaju2009-01-26T23:05:15+00:002009-01-26T23:05:15+00:00
<p>More reasons why Glassfish team should consider fixing this hardcoded install location strings.<br/>
There are issues filed on V2 that have been prioritized incorrectly IMO.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232286307000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewliseli2009-01-18T13:45:07+00:002009-01-18T13:45:07+00:00
<p>You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232285987000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewg&uuml;zeller2009-01-18T13:39:47+00:002009-01-18T13:39:47+00:00
<p>You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232285944000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewdiyet2009-01-18T13:39:04+00:002009-01-18T13:39:04+00:00
<p>You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232285899000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewaraba resimleri2009-01-18T13:38:19+00:002009-01-18T13:38:19+00:00
<p>thank you admin.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232285809000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewestetik2009-01-18T13:36:49+00:002009-01-18T13:36:49+00:00
<p>You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232285787000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewbebek resimleri2009-01-18T13:36:27+00:002009-01-18T13:36:27+00:00
<p>You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1232285663000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewmodifiye2009-01-18T13:34:23+00:002009-01-18T13:34:23+00:00
<p>You have a great product (and had a great name which made sense)! Why the need for a new name, with substandard design and poor branding. (Reminds me of the Royal Mail / Consignia fiasco and the BA funky tailfins disaster).<br/>
What was your new investment, a suitcase of monopoly money? Please refrain from using the art class of the local primary school for your next name change and redesign.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/develop_deploy_portlets_using_portalpack2#comment-1222263960000Re: Develop/Deploy Portlets using PortalPack2.0Betachat2008-09-24T13:46:00+00:002008-09-24T13:46:00+00:00
<p>Thanks you</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/ruby_on_rails_portlet_on#comment-1221484416000Re: Ruby on Rails Portlet on OpenPortal Portlet ContainerMikael Lammentausta2008-09-15T13:13:36+00:002008-09-15T13:13:36+00:00
<p>Since the links are dead and I found nothing from the Portlet Container trunk, I developed my own method using Rails in JSR286 portlets.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://blogger-mikael.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blogger-mikael.blogspot.com/</a> in the upcoming days for updates.</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/ruby_on_rails_portlet_on#comment-1220967639000Re: Ruby on Rails Portlet on OpenPortal Portlet ContainerJoeErsinghaus2008-09-09T13:40:39+00:002008-09-09T13:40:39+00:00
<p>Oh crap - it's September already and the last comment posted way back in April so I'm guessing there never was a screen cast.</p>
<p>But if I'm wrong - please post a link to it. :D</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/jsr_286_eventing_portlet_example#comment-1220500993000Re: JSR 286 Eventing Portlet Example and XML Portlet Available in Portlet Repositorymirc2008-09-04T04:03:13+00:002008-09-04T04:03:13+00:00
<p>thanks..</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_v2_draft_4_public#comment-1219579384000Re: WSRP v2 draft 4 public reviewmirc2008-08-24T12:03:04+00:002008-08-24T12:03:04+00:00
<p>thanx</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/wsrp_2_0_specification_approved#comment-1218620023000Re: WSRP 2.0 specification approved by OASISguest2008-08-13T09:33:43+00:002008-08-13T09:33:43+00:00
<p>ds;lmc</p>
https://blogs.oracle.com/portal/entry/bea_s_state_of_the#comment-1217529114000Re: BEA's State of the Portal Market Reportwww.msnli.com2008-07-31T18:31:54+00:002008-07-31T18:31:54+00:00
<p>thanx for you</p>