Some sketchey info on the net about this. You may have seen it before. Anyway I dug it up for ya and I believe the original story behind it is someone
shot this guy sometime in the early in 1900s. I think it was Argentina but don't quote me on that.

Yeah I thought about that pic before posting this thread. That Monkey desrves more research because it is unusually large compared to other types of a
similar known species in South America which is a bit too far south from Mexico.

Another possibility would be there was another (humanlike) race around at those times, some Neanderthaler like species, wich they used as skin donors.

The Aztec ruled only 500 years ago. There's NO way another Homo species lived at that time. Especially if there are no written records by any other
civilization at that time, which there were a lot of, considering that Europe during that time was pretty advanced in terms of record-keeping.

Originally posted by operation mindcrime
Or perhaps the people who made this statue were part of a more moderate streaming within the same religion that didn't believe in sacrificing
humans?

Peace

Doubt it. We're talking about the Aztecs here. They're arguably the most brutally religious folks in history, and sacrificed more than the Maya,
Olmec, and Inca combined.

So, why is it so hard for people to understand that it may not have been a human skin? Sure, it's known that they usually used human skin clothing as
a symbol for renewal. But they also used animal skin clothing as different symbols, such as bird:

And jaguar:

Also, it's known that both the Maya and Aztec cultures ate monkey, so they knew they were around. And the foot on the flayed skin resembles a
primate, for sure, but it looks a lot like a spider monkey, which did inhabit the jungles in that area, and still do.

They can imagine bigger and smaller variety of such things. Or, by chance, they could have designed an ape all on their own. If we look at the goelum
and other what nots invented elsewhere, they are fairly similar in concept and creation to other things.

You may also find this interesting. Basic idea is that some animals are engraved into our genetic memory because of such long-term exposure to them.
Some think that is why scratches on a chalk board bother us. Perhaps a dinosaur sounded like that.

Very interesting stuff indeed. I think there is a ton of evidence of contact between the Western World and Europe, Egypt and Asia so I don't think it
is too alarming to see chimp skin. The symbology in the deity is pretty interesting indeed though.

While being on the fence about the man, I can't help but remember something Credo Mutwa (sp) said in one of his interviews about man and how in his
original form he was apelike with androgynous (perhaps hermaphroditic?) traits and it was the visitors who put them into a machine that created two
separate genders. If that were indeed a larger primate with a pretty ornate looking representation of both male and female biology on the front.....

Seriously though its probably just an animal skin of some kind. Lots of animals have feet & hands that look like that. To make a huge leap forward,
ignoring all the many animals that were around back then in abundance (that they did take skins from sometimes) and to say there was a now-extinct
species of ape in that region, is not denying ignorance.

Just looking at the other pictures of animal skins, they also depicted the animals head. In the picture of human skin, they head is not included. Did
they think apes were former humans? Why leave the head off if it was an ape? Curious....

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.