Is this liberal bias from the media? Even if it was true, then couldn't it be due to self-fulfilling prophecy from the liberal media constantly telling men that they are dumb and women that they are smarter? They never took that into account.

How come there are no female equivalents of Einstein, Leonardo DaVinci, or Mozart? How come there are no great female leaders in history? (at least on the same level of great male leaders) Why do women get into car accidents more than men do? Why are men better at investing than women? How come they always suck at chess and hate the game (except for Russian and Slavic women)? Why do women hate logic and even admit it? Smart people do not hate logic. It seems the female brain is just not hardwired for logic.

Last edited by Winston on April 4th, 2014, 4:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.

No doubt Time as always is motivated by social engineering by their globalist owners/investors (subjugate male power and empower females as men represent a bigger threat to the world government agenda, being more inclined to view tyranny/authority as an alpha male threat while women are more inclined to view it as a protector and are less inclined to break the rules.)

Here's large undeniable statistical analysis showing men have higher IQs.

Wrong. Men are the ones with the highest IQs, this is a statistical fact.

Girls do better in school, because they're less distracted by the opposite sex and they don't view intelligence as uncool to the same degree as macho boys. Also, they're less lazy, work harder and receive more encouragement.
Importantly, they develop faster than boys.
After school, men overall outperform women in IQ-oriented fields like science, maths, VFX etc.

the IQ distributions between the sexes is different.
Women are more grouped around the average whereas men are more spread across the spectrum, thus you get more stupid men than women but also many more highly intelligent men than women. This makes evolutionary sense as the bigger the differences between males, the easier it is for women to select the top mates, also the best selected from a spread-out group will be much more intelligent than the best selected from an average group, hence humanity's intellectual evolution advances more quickly in theory all things being equal.

The reason that there are so many misandrist propaganda misinformation pieces like this is that the globalist elite that own the media have been pushing feminism. This is because men are the biggest threat to their control of the populations. In every takeover or suppression of an enemy throughout history the men were taken out first. Men are more likely to view totalitarian authority as an alpha male threat whereas women are more likely to view it as a protector (related to women liking the 'bad boys'). Men are thus more likely to challenge authority and are physically more dangerous.

Male and female mean IQs are about equal below the age of 15 but males have a higher mean IQ from age 15 on. The effect of sex differences in IQ is largest at the high extreme of intelligence. Since many of the more prestigious roles in society are associated with high IQ, the lack of female representation in these roles may be partially due to fewer females being competitive at the highest levels. This does not mean that females should not be given equal opportunity to demonstrate their abilities as this would create an worsened artificial 'glass ceiling'.

There are genius women. Geena Davis (I know, hardcore feminist activist; however, she is also clinically gifted and an active Mensan...credit where credit is due). Clara Schumann. Frida Kahlo. Martha Argerich. Zaha Hadid.

That said, it's the usual hypocritical political correctness when left progressives select these IQ studies to brag selectively when it suits them. Whenever IQ studies suggest something flattering about women, the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ phenomenon, political leftists, "blue-staters" and so forth, they shout it from the rooftops and pat each other's backs endlessly.

When the studies suggest something less comfortable about the African racial group, about disabled people, or about women's aptitudes in the visual or mathematical domains, all of a sudden, IQ is "a social construct", "culture-biased", "racist", "sexist", "doesn't measure anything valid", "doesn't measure multiple intelligences", "is mostly a product of environment", "is outdated bullsht from the nineteenth century", "smacks of eugenics", "is nullified by the Flynn Effect", and on and on and on until the cows come home.

That said, it's the usual hypocritical political correctness when left progressives select these IQ studies to brag selectively when it suits them. Whenever IQ studies suggest something flattering about women, the Ashkenazi Jewish IQ phenomenon, political leftists, "blue-staters" and so forth, they shout it from the rooftops and pat each other's backs endlessly.

When the studies suggest something less comfortable about the African racial group, about disabled people, or about women's aptitudes in the visual or mathematical domains, all of a sudden, IQ is "a social construct", "culture-biased", "racist", "sexist", "doesn't measure anything valid", "doesn't measure multiple intelligences", "is mostly a product of environment", "is outdated bullsht from the nineteenth century", "smacks of eugenics", "is nullified by the Flynn Effect", and on and on and on until the cows come home.

So, which is it, Lefty? You can't have it both ways.

And the sad part is that Geena Davis was fine-as-hell in the movie Quick Change in 1990, but she fell the f.uck off. She looks like a trainwreck now. That's women's liberation for ya.