Share Article

Prominent former Anti-Trust Attorney Richard I Fine, made a second 9-1-1 call from his cell in the Los Angeles County Central Men's Jail to the Full Disclosure Network®. Raising alarming issues regarding ethics and procedures of the U. S. Central District Court in California, Fine has spent the last four months in solitary confinement for civil contempt of court. While representing himself, Richard I. Fine is documenting unorthodox Court procedures while drafting court filings in an attempt to win his freedom from an indefinite jail sentence.

Jailed Court Critic Fights For Freedom

Judicial Benefits & Court Corruption

Past News Releases

Prominent former Attorney Richard I Fine, made a second 9-1-1 call from his cell in the Los Angeles County Central Men's Jail to the Full Disclosure Network®, raising alarming issues regarding the ethics and procedures of the U. S. Central District Court in California. Having spent the last four months in solitary confinement, Richard Fine describes in his court documents what appears to be the shocking tactics of an insular Judicial buddy system that could only be compared to the Code Of Silence deployed by street cops when one of their own is confronted with accusations of abuse.

WATCH VIDEO HERE: http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Blogs/71.phpIn an exclusive thirteen minute video news blog, Full Disclosure Network® has combined court records and the audio report via telephone from Richard Fine who is representing himself against the entire California Judicial system, from his jail cell. View related videos from the URLs below.

LEGAL BATTLE AIDED BY VOLUNTEERS
With the help of cadre of dedicated volunteers acting as messengers, paralegals, secretarial staff and moral support base, Richard I Fine has used his total recall of the Federal Codes to dictate and draft dozens of court filings in several on going cases.

He is determined to win his freedom from an indefinite jail sentence for civil contempt of court, and to win back his license to practice that was taken from him while fighting to reform the California Judicial System.

JUDICIAL CONFLICT?
In the video and in court documents Fine describes how Federal Magistrate Judge Carla Woerhle delayed action, issued court orders that were never acted upon, and wrote a Report and Recommendation to deny Fine's Writ of Habeas Corpus (request for immediate release from jail) without having ever read the petition. And, in conclusion, he contends that by denying his Writ of Habeas Corpus, Judge Walters also ignored the fact that no opposition had been filed against the petition by either the Respondent, Sheriff Baca, the Superior Court, or Judge Yaffe, and exclaims amazement that his petition was denied and that he remains in jail for over four months.

At the conclusion of the video, Fine alleges that both Magistrate Judge Woerhle and U. S. Judge John F. Walter failed to disclose a serious conflict that should have precluded them from even considering the petition.