Dynamic binding, ballot (with better line breaks)

[Resent to fix nasty line-breaking problems...]
Will suggested that I send out another ballot concerning whether or not to
include dynamic binding, as described in a separate message (and in earlier
ones), in an appendix to R4RS. I include such a ballot below. Please send
your ballots to me before the new year. I will compile the results and
send them out at that time.
Pavel
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | |
| | I do not object to including a description of dynamic binding, as |
| | defined in the recent message to RRRS-Authors, in an appendix to |
| | R4RS. |
| | |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | |
| | I do not object to including a description of dynamic binding, |
| | similar to that in the recent message to RRRS-Authors, in an |
| | appendix to R4RS as long as it reflects the changes I want. |
| | A brief overview of my desired changes appears below this ballot. |
| | |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | |
| | I object to including a description of dynamic binding, similar |
| | to that in the recent message to RRRS-Authors, in an appendix to |
| | R4RS. |
| | |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
Additional comments: