I liked having the tool bar on the bottom as well as on the top of the thread page because you could just hit "user CP" instead of "Go" that way you were taken to your "new subscribed threads" allowing you to follow your varied discussions no matter if they were on page two, three, four or in the war room. Whenever a new post was made no matter where you could find in at a glance in user CP.

I liked having the tool bar on the bottom as well as on the top of the thread page because you could just hit "user CP" instead of "Go" that way you were taken to your "new subscribed threads" allowing you to follow your varied discussions no matter if they were on page two, three, four or in the war room. Whenever a new post was made no matter where you could find in at a glance in user CP.

I plan on bringing back a lot of the old enhancements... I was just up until 4am last night getting the forum backed up, reloaded and upgraded.

Since i have the most rep and I have been here almost as long as Sassy, I should have at least as high a rep stick as hers, but inistead she has a bigger rep stick.

I am not amused.

Nah... No favoritism. Check out Crush Girl's rep. If there were favoritism, she'd be able to crack some skulls.

The system is currently weighted in favor of length of time here and number of posts...

For every 365 days, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power. For every For every 10000 posts, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

For every 100,000 points of reputation, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

I have been considering changing the final option, but have decided to wait until after I delete "rep whoring" threads to do that. Which I'd ad, would knock Alec's rep down immensely. But people seem to enjoy them so I figure what the hell, let them have their fun. Also I'd ad, I am trying to combat a situation where a new person can come in and have a full rep bar by the end of the week.

The only part of rep I honestly care about is the comments anyway. The rest is a bunch of fluff that means little over the long haul. It's just a diversion that adds a little spice to the board. If rep meant anything anyways, I'd have a bunch of it thanking me for upgrading the board and working out the bugs instead of people starting threads about whether the changes are good enough for them or not.

Nah... No favoritism. Check out Crush Girl's rep. If there were favoritism, she'd be able to crack some skulls.

The system is currently weighted in favor of length of time here and number of posts...

For every 365 days, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power. For every For every 10000 posts, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

For every 100,000 points of reputation, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

I have been considering changing the final option, but have decided to wait until after I delete "rep whoring" threads to do that. Which I'd ad, would knock Alec's rep down immensely. But people seem to enjoy them so I figure what the hell, let them have their fun. Also I'd ad, I am trying to combat a situation where a new person can come in and have a full rep bar by the end of the week.

The only part of rep I honestly care about is the comments anyway. The rest is a bunch of fluff that means little over the long haul. It's just a diversion that adds a little spice to the board. If rep meant anything anyways, I'd have a bunch of it thanking me for upgrading the board and working out the bugs instead of people starting threads about whether the changes are good enough for them or not.

/just sayin...

[PHP]The system is currently weighted in favor of length of time here and number of posts...

For every 365 days, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power. For every For every 10000 posts, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

For every 100,000 points of reputation, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.[/PHP]

Nah... No favoritism. Check out Crush Girl's rep. If there were favoritism, she'd be able to crack some skulls.

The system is currently weighted in favor of length of time here and number of posts...

For every 365 days, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power. For every For every 10000 posts, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

For every 100,000 points of reputation, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

I have been considering changing the final option, but have decided to wait until after I delete "rep whoring" threads to do that. Which I'd ad, would knock Alec's rep down immensely. But people seem to enjoy them so I figure what the hell, let them have their fun. Also I'd ad, I am trying to combat a situation where a new person can come in and have a full rep bar by the end of the week.

The only part of rep I honestly care about is the comments anyway. The rest is a bunch of fluff that means little over the long haul. It's just a diversion that adds a little spice to the board. If rep meant anything anyways, I'd have a bunch of it thanking me for upgrading the board and working out the bugs instead of people starting threads about whether the changes are good enough for them or not.

/just sayin...

Check your rep...whore!!! Oh, and thanks! Not just for this upgrade but for giving me a place to visit on the net just about everyday for the past 4 years and 5 months. I've said it once and I'll say it again... you have many a beers with your name on them the day we meet!

Nah... No favoritism. Check out Crush Girl's rep. If there were favoritism, she'd be able to crack some skulls.

The system is currently weighted in favor of length of time here and number of posts...

For every 365 days, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power. For every For every 10000 posts, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

For every 100,000 points of reputation, users gain 1 point of reputation-altering power.

I have been considering changing the final option, but have decided to wait until after I delete "rep whoring" threads to do that. Which I'd ad, would knock Alec's rep down immensely. But people seem to enjoy them so I figure what the hell, let them have their fun. Also I'd ad, I am trying to combat a situation where a new person can come in and have a full rep bar by the end of the week.

The only part of rep I honestly care about is the comments anyway. The rest is a bunch of fluff that means little over the long haul. It's just a diversion that adds a little spice to the board. If rep meant anything anyways, I'd have a bunch of it thanking me for upgrading the board and working out the bugs instead of people starting threads about whether the changes are good enough for them or not.

/just sayin...

Rep should have never been weighted. All positive rep should be worth one point, unless you're in the black, then your rep should mean nothing. If you max out your rep bars, then you get two points. That's it. Then all posts and all posters would be measured equally, except the canal water sucking trolls.

Instead you've decided to take a poster who's been banned for misconduct on three separate occasions and make him the most influential member of the community. I guess since we all understand that rep is often reciprocol, you figure that will improve his pitiful average of one rep dot per 11,500 posts.

The criteria you selected to justify this misguided act of charity makes you look more prejudiced, not less. There are 1176 active members on this board, but only 13, a scant .011 percent, meet the requisite of 10,000 posts. Even worse, the join dates listed on this board are inaccurate after the various resets.

So, whatever, Isaac, run a rigged game if that makes you happy. I wish you the best.

Rep should have never been weighted. All positive rep should be worth one point, unless you're in the black, then your rep should mean nothing. If you max out your rep bars, then you get two points. That's it. Then all posts and all posters would be measured equally, except the canal water sucking trolls.

Instead you've decided to take a poster who's been banned for misconduct on three separate occasions and make him the most influential member of the community. I guess since we all understand that rep is often reciprocol, you figure that will improve his pitiful average of one rep dot per 11,500 posts.

The criteria you selected to justify this misguided act of charity makes you look more prejudiced, not less. There are 1176 active members on this board, but only 13, a scant .011 percent, meet the requisite of 10,000 posts. Even worse, the join dates listed on this board are inaccurate after the various resets.

So, whatever, Isaac, run a rigged game if that makes you happy. I wish you the best.

You will always find your way to the top no matter how the system is weighted because you have some of the best football takes and some of the funniest posts on the board. Last time I checked you were#1 as it should be . Relax Bro, you the man and everyone knows it.