I think that fights between guilds would be a great, great idea. It seems to be much better way to rank guilds comparing to the one basing on pure statistics and people within one guild would finally start helping their guild mates more than nowadays. It would also take rivalry into inter-national level, or

I also think it would be a great idea to add some additional info to players' profile, like the best achieved survivor/elo score (just an example) which would be good indicator of how good a player is. In some rooms there's a plenty of high- leveled players who spend most of their playing time playing against newbies with 2 Jackies, 2 Dorians, 2 Zatmans and Hugo. That kills of fun when you have to play two, three times in a row overpowered, similar decks like that. Now to gain more respect they would have to do more effort than spending few hours a days using the same decks and ripping of 'normal' players. It would also encourage you to risk for higher elo/survivor scoress and game would become even more fierce.

I know there are rooms for every one needs and you can always find one that you like the most. I know some of them give you more freedom on creating your deck but I think it would be good to forbid double/triple characters in the same deck in all of rooms. One Jackie, Vickie or Hawk a deck is far enough, why more creative players should be disadvanged?

You're best off with a couple of clans (else sacrificing bonuses is just stupid) and going for both 2* and 3* cards.

Prince Jr
Filomena
Mona
Ottavia/Sharon

Samantha
Zatman
Jackie 3*
Dorian 3*

Whilst this retains only 3 2*'s it gives you huge average power (4 cards below 7 power, 2 of which give the opponent -2 power) as well as a decent (though hardly amazing) spread of damage and abilities.

Of course adding cards like lyse teria will make this deck amazingly good, but this is the discount version. I still think that having more than a couple of clans kills yourself against anyone that has any idea of how to play.