If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I am a confessed Mebury hater, but not playing him at all is messed up. It's definitely political. D'Antoni and Walsh don't want him here (and probably most of the team) so they are not going to play him to piss him off and wait for him to give them a reason to buy him out.

So in order to express their message without the usage of words, they're sacrificing a win? I mean seriously.... We all know what Marbury is capable of and can definitely contribute to beating Miami. If they lose this game cause they were too stubborn to let Marbury play, I'll be pissed.

I am a confessed Mebury hater, but not playing him at all is messed up. It's definitely political. D'Antoni and Walsh don't want him here (and probably most of the team) so they are not going to play him to piss him off and wait for him to give them a reason to buy him out.

Dolan is not going to buy Marbury out.
And when the losses become more than the WINS....Marbury will get as much playingtime as he wants when he wants.

So in order to express their message without the usage of words, they're sacrificing a win? I mean seriously.... We all know what Marbury is capable of and can definitely contribute to beating Miami. If they lose this game cause they were too stubborn to let Marbury play, I'll be pissed.