Why Bush must win

http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
I support the reelection of President George W. Bush. Why? Because I believe one issue overwhelms all others: the President's strong commitment to fight the forces of international terrorism regardless of the cost or how long it takes to achieve victory.

I do not agree with President Bush on a single major domestic issue, but in my view, those issues pale in comparison with the threat of international terrorism. Osama bin Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the evil poster boys of mass murder, are revered and supported by millions of Muslims throughout the world. The stated goal of al-Qaeda and its supporters is to kill or convert every infidel, and that means Jews, Christians, Buddhists, and everyone else who will not accept Islam's supremacy.

These terrorists are convinced that non-Islamic nations do not have the will and courage to persevere in this ongoing struggle, which could last decades. They believe the democracies are weak-willed and will ultimately yield to whatever demands are made upon them. By withdrawing their troops from Iraq in response to terrorist attacks, Spain and the Philippines have already shown that, tragically, terror tactics, including suicide attacks, car bombings and the beheading of innocent civilians, do work. They also intend to destroy moderate Muslim governments that want to live in peace with countries that are not Islamic. Shortly after 9/11, President Bush announced his commitment to the struggle against Islamic fanatics who believe they can destroy the values of western civilization and democratic governments everywhere. On entering this war against terrorism after 9/11, President Bush said, "We shall go after the terrorists and the countries that harbor them." This Bush Doctrine rivals in importance the Monroe Doctrine, which limited the colonization efforts of foreign powers in the western hemisphere, and the Truman Doctrine, which contained the spread of Communism. President Bush has proven that he is prepared to keep to his commitment to fight terrorism.

If John Kerry were to win this presidential election, would he stand up to terrorism to the same extent as George Bush? I don't think so. Regrettably, my party, the Democratic party, now has a strong radical left wing whose members often dominate the party primaries. Those same left-wing radicals have an anti-Israel philosophy, reviling that democratic state which shares the values held by a majority of Americans.

Kerry is a patriotic American who performed heroically in the Vietnam War. Regrettably, he surrendered his philosophical independence to the left wing in the recent primaries in order to prevail over the original darling of the radicals, Howard Dean. Kerry owes his nomination in large part to the supporters of Dean and the support of Senator Ted Kennedy. Kennedy sadly demonstrated his loss of any sense of decency with his crude attacks on President Bush using unacceptable, abusive language. The hatred deliberately stirred by Kennedy directed at President Bush is contemptible and dangerous. It encourages our terrorist enemies with whom we are at war, and it incites the crazies in our own country.

On July 9th, a Kerry/Edwards fundraising concert was held at Radio City Music Hall. During that concert Hollywood comedienne Whoopi Goldberg engaged in unprintable, despicable, sexual references to the President and the Vice President. She combined the President's family name with allusions to the female anatomy, and she made a sexual reference to Vice President Dick Cheney's first name by referring to the male anatomy. Even worse was Kerry's thank you from the stage to all of the performers saying that they conveyed "the heart and soul of our country." Shameful.

Now a comment about the war in Iraq. Most Americans understand that few, if any, wars go smoothly. Just cast your mind back to the American Revolutionary War, during which New York City was occupied by enemy forces for seven years, or the American Civil War, in which Confederate armies won victory after victory on the battlefield, or even World War II, in which the Nazi menace was defeated at an enormous cost in human lives. Should we have gone to war with Iraq? I believe the answer is yes.

During a daily briefing after 9/11, then CIA Director George Tenet told the President that Iraq had the ability to wage chemical and biological war on the U.S. He referred to Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction as a "slam dunk." Had the President not engaged in the preemptive war against Saddam, and if this madman had subsequently released biological agents in the U.S. or poison gas, which he had already used against the Kurds and Iran, does anyone doubt that the President would have been impeached? The security agencies of nearly every democratic nation provided to their President or Prime Minister the same description of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction capability. The U.S. Congress had the same information and concurred with the President's decision. The U.N. Security Council unanimously concurred, passing Resolution 1441. But it was President Bush who had the courage to take up arms in defense of the U.S. and our allies. That is what leadership is all about.

A poll released by the Washington Post on July 14, 2004, showed that "55 percent of Americans approve of the way Bush is handling the campaign against terrorism," and "51 percent also said they trust Bush more than Kerry to deal with terrorism, while 42 percent prefer the Democrat."

We also should not forget that President Bush, in my opinion, has been the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House. At the U.N. Security Council and in the U.N. General Assembly, allies of the U.S. and others who are indifferent or hostile to our country have conveyed the view that if we end our alliance with Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, they would welcome back the U.S. into their circle. President Bush has refused to abandon our ally Israel. In my opinion, the U.S. presidents who have been Israel's greatest friends are, in order, the current President Bush, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. This November, we Americans in the Jewish community should remember our friends. We should thank President Bush for his courage in the war against terrorism and for his strong and consistent support for Israel and democracy.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Edward I. Koch, the former mayor of New York, can be heard on Bloomberg Radio (WBBR 1130 AM) every Saturday from 9-10 am. Comment by clicking here.

07/14/04: The crass class 07/07/04: Potpourri06/29/04: Moore is an irresponsible propagandist who would have denounced WW II, too06/16/04: Behind every hero …06/08/04: Reagan's afterlife on Earth05/19/04: We should not be pleading with the U.N. for help  we should be demanding it05/12/04: Abu Ghraib will go away but Rummy  and Bush  shouldn't04/20/04: Freedom of … what? 03/03/04: Wake-up call: Prez will be defeated if he doesn't take action to stop other dangerous attack03/12/04: Yes, Jews do engage in anti-Semitic behavior02/04/04: History will judge Bush favorably01/28/04: Why the President was justified  David Kay or not 01/15/04: It is not compassionate or intelligent to open our borders to all 12/24/03: Why I'm voting for Bush 11/26/03: Appeasement only whets the appetite of aggressors 11/06/03: Putin's prosecution of the oligarchs can teach a powerful lesson about anti-Semitism 07/30/03: As the world churns07/23/03: America not so different than Russia in pursuing white collar criminals07/16/03: Dems, media are making an unforgivable mistake06/18/03: Keep American troops out of Israel05/22/03: It's lots of fun to remain relevant05/14/03: Living up to their mascot's image? Dems attacks on prez are backfiring 05/07/03: Wall Street settlement was not justice04/16/03: The doves were proven wrong. Instead of conceding defeat, they are throwing another political tantrum04/09/03: As the world churns04/03/03: Gulf War II: The misleading media does it again03/18/03: Have the courage to admit it, Pat: You're a classic anti-Semite who gives conservatives a bad name03/12/03: "There they go again"? Not quite!03/05/03: Making the case for war on British TV left some panelists stunned 02/20/03: Death penalty=racism? Don't confuse them with the facts02/12/03: History is now repeating itself --- why don't the American bashers grasp it?02/05/03: As the world turns01/30/03: Why are sports exempt from racial diversity and universities encouraged to engage in racial preferences over individual academic achievement?01/23/03: We absolutely can't back down11/13/02: President blunted the Ted Kennedys of Democrat party --- good for him!10/23/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate is no private citizen and his 'defenses' are idiotic10/01/02: Congress is not doing its job09/26/02: Confronting pathetic Americans in a post 9-11 world09/19/02: Don't be fooled by Saddam09/05/02: Necessary or not, getting congressional approval for war is common-sense08/28/02: In defense of terrorism08/22/02: Saddam Hussein is extremely popular in "Arab street," so why attack him?08/15/02: My potpourri08/09/02: Traitors: Journalistic and 'patriotic'07/31/02: Euros should spend their time analyzing their own country's wartime actions07/25/02: I may know next to nothing about the stock market, but I'm not getting out07/18/02: Dems should stop trying to 'Whitewater' the President 07/11/02: Real Americans and the Islamic threat