Element 2 - KnowledgeThe second element is that the
defendant knew or believed that the money, goods, services or anything else of
value had been obtained by the illegal use of a credit card. A person acts "knowingly"
with respect to conduct or circumstances when (he/she) is aware that (his/her)
conduct is of such nature or that such circumstances exist. <See
Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>

[<Include if appropriate:> Any
person who obtains at a discount price a ticket issued by an airline, railroad,
steamship or other transportation company that was acquired by the illegal use
of a credit card without reasonable inquiry to ascertain that the person from
whom it was obtained had a legal right to possess it shall be presumed to know
that such ticket was acquired under circumstances constituting a violation of
said section. This means that you may find, but are not required to, that the
defendant knew that the ticket had been acquired through the illegal use of a
credit card if you find that (he/she) did not make a reasonable inquiry into the
person's right to use the card.]

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant received money, goods, services
or anything else of value obtained by the illegal use of a credit card, and 2)
(he/she) knew that the money, goods, services had been obtained by the illegal
use of a credit card.

If you unanimously find that the state
has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of the crime of the
receipt of money, goods, or services obtained by illegal use of a credit card,
then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously
find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the
elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
_______________________________________________________