24 thoughts on “The Cell Phone Jammer Story”

All they need is a Title 3 wiretap warrant and they can track you, listen in, etc. Of course a title 3 warrant can only be introduced to a judge by? a US Attorney (federal prosecutor), They only use these on major drug cases, organized crime, terrorism. Its a massive hassle and take millions to tap just a small network of drug dealers. So this notion that 4000 FBI agent (thats how many are in the FBI now) are magically listening to 300 million americans is stupid.

@jacobew2000 Actually the FCC wont do anything to anyone unless they can prove in court you caused damage by using it, which is almost impossible. The most they will do is take it and order an injunction from? you ever owning one.
Its not illegal to own one, its illegal to use one where it interferes with others.

In the United States, cell-phone jamming is covered under the Communications Act of 1934 But under FCC requlations? any cell phone transmissions may be blocked in aprivate business or on any Federal property

When visiting? England last year, many people carry jammers and use them in buses, resturants and just about anyplace where people are a nuisance talking on cell phones. They should be legal here to keep kids from texting while driving.

They get the right to listen into calls without warrent, and we can’t hide ourselves in public because of 47 U.S.C. Sections 301, 302a, 333.? And I know people who agree with this stuff who claim they want smaller government.

I know that jammers can prevent inside the range-cell phones from receiving incoming calls fron a cell phone located anywhere, but can jammers prevent cell phones from making outgoing calls to a cell? phone outside of the coverage range? Please I need your comments

@2204Alpha You wouldn’t have humans listening on large scale telephone intercepts you would have computers monitoring for keywords and recording only conversations with target keywords in them or to insure you get the entire conversation you would record all monitored conversations until the conversation ends without a keyword spoken at which point that particular? conversation is deleted and the storage space is reclaimed. If a keyword is spoken the conversation would not be deleted.

i thought that once the phone is off, it can not radiate rf energy! maybe the gps is differant, but the phone i thought could not be activated from far out when it is off. i gotta think about that more? i guess.