The challenge when in a low IRS discount rate environment is to maximize your donors’ options, including – when appropriate – acquainting them with novel approaches. In certain situations, one such approach in particular can be especially "gratifying."

Combining a GRAT with Annual Outright Gifts

With a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT), the grantor (effectively the "donor") contributes assets to a trust and agrees to receive a fixed-dollar amount for a term of years. At the end of that term, whatever is left in the trust passes to one or more non-charitable beneficiaries, typically one or more heirs. At the time the trust is established, the grantor makes a taxable gift to the heir(s) equal to the value of the assets transferred to the trust less the present value of the annuity payments to be made back to the donor.

It is possible to set the trust term and payment amount so that there is no taxable gift. Then, whatever remains in the GRAT when it terminates will pass to the heir(s) free of gift tax. If the grantor dies prior to the end of the trust term, all of the remaining trust assets are included in the grantor's estate. However, this would also have been the case if the trust had never been established.

GRATs are appealing now for the same reason that a charitable lead annuity trust (CLAT) is appealing. In both cases, the value of the income interest is calculated using the IRS discount rate. If the GRAT can generate a return in excess of this rate, which was just 2.2% in January 2014, the donor can pass the increase in value on to heir(s) without incurring any gift tax. Note that the gift tax deduction available for establishing a GRAT must be calculated using the IRS discount rate for the month in which the trust is established; the grantor does not have the two-month "look-back" option that is available when computing the charitable deduction for a CLAT and many other planned giving vehicles.

Indeed, a GRAT is not a charitable instrument, but it can be a way simultaneously to pass property to one or more heirs and support one or more charities if the grantor uses a portion of the trust payments to make charitable gifts. This is the strategy followed by Sandy when in March of 2014, she transfers stock valued at $1,000,000 to a GRAT that will pay her $215,000* per year for five years, and then distribute the trust remainder to her children. Each year while the trust is in existence, she makes charitable gifts totaling $150,000 to different charities.

Amount transferred to the GRAT

$1,000,000

Annual payment to Sandy*

215,000

Total payments to Sandy over five years

1,075,000

Taxable gift to children

-0-

Presumed value of trust assets at the end of five years

250,000

Amount passed to children free of gift tax

250,000

Total charitable gifts

750,000

Tax savings from charitable gifts (36.9% tax rate)

276,750

Payments to Sandy less charitable contributions and estimated tax on her payments

approx. 250,000

Summary:

Total benefit to Sandy ($276,750 + approx. 250,000)

approx. $526,750

Total wealth passed to children

250,000

Total charitable gifts

750,000

Total benefits to all parties combined

approx. $1,526,750

*$215,000 is the annual payment – rounded up to the next thousand dollars and made at the end of each year – that reduces Sandy's taxable gift to $0.Thus, all of Sandy's gift and estate tax exemptions are preserved for other taxable transfers.

GRAT vs. CLAT

As noted earlier, both GRATs and CLATs are attractive now because, depending on the payout rate and trust duration selected by the donor, a low discount rate helps to minimize or even eliminate the value of the transfer potentially subject to gift tax. This assumes that the CLAT in question is a non-grantor CLAT, i.e., one that distributes its assets to persons other than the donor upon termination of the trust. In the case of a non-grantor CLAT, however, only certain classes of persons can be remainder beneficiaries, whereas a GRAT can be established for the ultimate benefit of any individual, regardless of his or her relationship to the donor.

Of course, a CLAT can also be structured as a grantor CLAT, which typically results in the trust's assets being returned to the donor when the CLAT terminates. Such a trust features no gift tax benefit but does produce an income tax charitable deduction. (It is also possible to combine elements of both a grantor and non-grantor CLAT, but this is seldom done in practice.) Because the payments made to charity each year by a grantor CLAT are "for the use of" charity, the income tax charitable deduction the donor receives upon creating the trust can be used up to a limit of only 30 percent of the donor's adjusted gross income (AGI). For some donors, this can delay or dilute the value of the deduction. By contrast, in a situation such as Sandy's in the example above, if a donor uses cash received from a GRAT to make an outright charitable gift, the associated deduction can be used up to a limit of 50 percent of the donor's AGI.

Obviously, you will prefer to have your donor establish a CLAT of one type or another, rather than a GRAT, because your institution will then be a direct beneficiary of the CLAT and will not be dependent on your donor to decide each year what portion – if any – of the payments received from the GRAT he or she will actually contribute to your charity. Nevertheless, you should not hesitate to mention both a CLAT and a GRAT, trusting that if the connection between your donor and your charity is strong enough, your charity will benefit either way.

**The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 set the lifetime exclusion for all transfer taxes (gift, estate and generation-skipping) to a much higher amount than it had been previously. For 2014, the amount is $5,340,000. This large exemption makes it easy to not have to pay gift tax for everyone but the most wealthy individuals. This will effect whether a donor will find the gift options noted above necessary to avoid gift tax, depending on the gift amount.