Welcome to Texas justice: You might beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Judge orders state hospital to take more competency restoration patients

This blog has long criticized the state's de facto use of county jails as mental health wards, and particularly Texas' failure to provide timely "competency restoration" services when a defendant is deemed incompetent to stand trial. In many cases, particularly for misdemeanants, defendants in the past have ended up incarcerated longer waiting for a spot in a state hospital than they would if they'd been allowed to plead guilty and served their full sentence. The problem reached a boiling point in Travis County last week, reports the Austin Statesman's Chuck Lindell in today's Austin Statesman ("Judge: Mentally ill patients wait too long for treatment"). The story opens:

An Austin judge ordered five Travis County prisoners into treatment at the Austin State Hospital last Tuesday an act of frustration that, if repeated, could provoke a confrontation over the state's underfunded and strained mental health system.

The three men and two women had been ruled incompetent to stand trial because mental health problems left them unable to understand the legal issues involved or assist in their defense.

Charged only with misdemeanors related to family violence or trespassing, the five had been waiting up to 71 days for a bed to open at the Austin State Hospital, where they would receive treatment — typically drugs and therapy — designed to restore mental competence so a trial could be held.

County Court-at-Law Judge Nancy Hohengarten worried that the long wait could jeopardize the prisoners' due process rights, the constitutional guarantee of fair treatment in the justice system.

So she ordered them to be immediately taken to the Austin State Hospital, and within 24 hours, all were admitted.

Problem solved?

No. The hospital, which serves 38 counties, still had 34 felony and misdemeanor defendants on a waiting list for competency treatment as of Friday, including 21 from Travis County, the state health department said.

Another 21 prisoners who have been ruled mentally incompetent were awaiting beds in other state-run facilities that offer specialized care, such as maximum-security settings — including one who's been waiting 257 days and four still waiting after 109 to 180 days.

But as Travis County acted to lessen the pressure on its jails and correct a potential constitutional violation, last week's order raised the pressure on the Austin State Hospital, where the demand for beds has long exceeded the supply.

Half of state hospital beds are designated as "forensic" beds for competency restoration and the other half are used for mentally ill folk who seek treatment in emergency rooms. The Department of State Health Services told Lindell that when courts order them to take someone, they will comply, but "Emergency room patients next on the list to get a bed will now have to wait longer or find psychiatric services elsewhere." According to DSHS, "People committed to the Austin hospital for emergency care typically stabilize and are released in seven to 10 days," while "Restoring a defendant to competency averages 35 days."

Austin attorney Keith Hampton is pushing for more such court orders, telling Lindell, "To be incompetent to stand trial, your mental disability has to be real severe. But when I saw people in jail over 100 days, I just went, 'This is it; enough is enough.' ... Maybe this will make leaving disabled people in jail a very rare occurrence instead of a common one." Hampton has promised to share his legal briefs on the topic with any other attorney statewide with a client in a similar circumstance. Bully for him.

This development in a sense may be an outgrowth of Travis County creating a specialized mental health docket run by Judge Hohengarten. She told the paper that displacing emergency patients weighs heavily on her, but "It is not appropriate to treat them in jail. It's a liability for local counties, and it can be inhumane. It certainly is not a proper way to deal with mental illness." That's very true, but the same thing has been happening for many, many years. Perhaps consolidating all the cases in one county under a single judge surely helped clarify the issue and crystalize what exactly the judiciary can do about it when waiting lists for state hospital beds grow to untenable levels.

There's another aspect to the story I don't quite understand. Hampton

is pushing Travis County judges to put time limits on their orders that declare a defendant mentally incompetent to stand trial.

The strategy works well for Williamson County, where incompetency rulings frequently include a 14-day time limit for defendants to receive mental health treatment, District Judge Billy Ray Stubblefield said.

Hohengarten said she is contemplating a time limit as well — something between a week and 21 days.

Some misdemeanor cases, she noted, have been dismissed because a defendant's time in jail and the state hospital equaled the maximum possible sentence.

"It is not out of the ordinary to have people waiting for unreasonable amounts of time," Hohengarten said. "This has been going on for years."

I'm not sure I see how setting a short time limit would work given long state waiting lists for competency restoration beds, or for that matter how it would be any different from what Hohengarten is now doing much later in the process. What happens if the state fails to accept clients within 14 days, one wonders? Do judges order the state hospital to take them, as Hohengarten has, and doesn't that create the same displacement of emergency beds feared from her recent orders? It's hard to tell from the story how that works.

Legislation approved earlier this year (HB 2725 by Hartnett) ordered judges to count time on the waiting list for restoration services against the ultimate sentence, making it easier to get charges dismissed when time incarcerated reaches sentence length. The bill capped total incarceration time — including both in jail and the state hospital - at the maximum sentence for the alleged offense. As Grits wrote of the legislation this spring, "HB 2725 gives jails a release valve on the back end for less serious cases, but it doesn't resolve the underlying failure of the state to find the right mix of incarceration/institutionalization/community supervision, nor address mental illness in any but the most reactionary way, lurching from short-term crisis to crisis without an overall guiding vision for how all the pieces are supposed to work together. Such discussions, regrettably, are far from today's legislative debate."

Indeed, because the main need is more resources and the state's leadership has long been allergic to new taxes, Texas' political leadership appears utterly incapable of approving more than band-aid fixes to this problem, meaning it's up to judges like Hohengarten to push the envelope until the legislative branch actually addresses it.

County jails and state prisons have become the de facto mental health system in Texas already. This trend, if it continues to its natural conclusion - where forensic beds predominate in state hospitals - would just make it official that the only way to get treatment for serious mental health problems is to commit a crime. The issue has been neglected by state leaders for way too long, and despite dubious assurances by officials in the story that "help is on the way," there's no indication the problem will abate anytime soon without further judicial intervention.

3 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Doesn't anyone but me see we need to open State Hospitals again? We have a lot of people who could benefit from a mental health hospital. The State closed them, saying they are too expensive to stay open. Well, being a medical person, I believe the cost off sets the benefit of those who are in need of mental health care. We need to give them the medication and treatment their brain is not furnishing not lump them in one pot and put them in prison. Anyone ever heard of mental illness? Mental illness and physical illness are one and the same, just need to be treated differently.

"The State" is the underlying them and the obvious problem to begin with. The State is generating "criminals" and "mental health patients" for its State run services. The "State of Texas" creates its own need to exist. A person doesn't belong locked up for trespassing. No one belongs in jail if they have not caused harm or damaged to another. People are put in jail everyday by judges like Nancy Hohengarten for frivolous so-called crimes. Police officers strip people's rights away everyday. Judge Hohengarten doesn't care an ounce about rights. She is terrified of people who evoke their rights. In fact, will put them in jail for standing up for their right of due process. The State should stop putting people in jail. America has a third of the world's prisoners, with only 5% of the population.

GfB Writer Bios

Subscribe by email

Support Grits via Donation

Donate to Grits via PayPal. Grits is a hobby, but donations help cover newspaper subscriptions, periodic travel, open records fees, etc.. Donate if you can! When I have resources, the blog can do more stuff!

"I always tell people interested in these issues that your blog is the most important news source, and have had high-ranking corrections officials tell me they read it regularly."

- Scott Medlock, Texas Civil Rights Project

"a helluva blog"

- Solomon Moore, NY Times criminal justice correspondent

"Congrats on building one of the most read and important blogs on a specific policy area that I've ever seen"

- Donald Lee, Texas Conference of Urban Counties

GFB "is a fact-packed, trustworthy reporter of the weirdness that makes up corrections and criminal law in the Lone Star State" and has "shown more naked emperors than Hans Christian Andersen ever did."

-Attorney Bob Mabry, Conroe

"Grits really shows the potential of a single-state focused criminal law blog"

- Corey Yung, Sex Crimes Blog

"I regard Grits for Breakfast as one of the most welcome and helpful vehicles we elected officials have for understanding the problems and their solutions."

Tommy Adkisson,Bexar County Commissioner

"dude really has a pragmatic approach to crime fighting, almost like he’s some kind of statistics superhero"

- Rob Patterson, The Austin Post"Scott Henson's 'Grits for Breakfast' is one of the most insightful blogs on criminal justice issues in Texas."

- Texas Public Policy Foundation

"Nobody does it better or works harder getting it right"

David Jennings, aka "Big Jolly"

"I appreciate the fact that you obviously try to see both sides of an issue, regardless of which side you end up supporting."

Kim Vickers,Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and EducationGrits for Breakfast "has probably broken more criminal justice stories than any TX reporter, but stays under the radar. Fascinating guy."

Maurice Chammah,The Marshall Project"unrestrained and uneducated"

John Bradley,Former Williamson County District Attorney, now former Attorney General of Palau

"our favorite blog"

- Texas District and County Attorneys Association Twitter feed"Scott Henson ... writes his terrific blog Grits for Breakfast from an outhouse in Texas."