New trial ordered for Saskatchewan lovers convicted of plotting to kill spouses

By The Canadian Press

Wed., Aug. 8, 2018

REGINA—Saskatchewan’s top court has ordered a new trial for a man and woman convicted of conspiracy to murder their spouses.

Three Court of Appeal judges unanimously agreed that a trial judge erred in his charge to the jury that convicted Curtis Vey and Angela Nicholson in 2016.

Angela Nicholson arrives at court in Prince Albert, Sask., on May 25, 2016. She and Curtis Vey were convicted of conspiracy to murder their spouses in 2016, but the province’s top court has ordered a new trial based on the instructions the jury received. (Jennifer Graham / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO)

Curtis Vey arrives at court in Prince Albert, Sask., May 24, 2016. He and Angela Nicholson were convicted of conspiracy to murder their spouses in 2016, but the province’s top court has ordered a new trial based on the instructions the jury received. (Jennifer Graham / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO)

The jury heard that Vey, who is from Wakaw, and Nicholson, who is from nearby Melfort, were having an affair.

They were arrested after Vey’s wife made a secret recording of the pair plotting to kill her and Nicholson’s husband.

Court heard Vey’s wife was to die in a house fire and Nicholson’s husband was to be drugged and disappear.

Article Continued Below

The Appeal court said in its decision Wednesday that the judge did not make it clear the jurors must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that both accused intended to commit murder.

“When the police interviewed Mr. Vey after his arrest, and in his conversations with the undercover officer in his cell, he maintained that he knew or suspected his wife was recording him on July 1, 2013, and said he had engaged in the murder conversation to give his wife and family something to talk about,” said the Appeal decision.

“He also said that all Ms. Nicholson and he had were ‘discussions’ with no intention to commit murder.”

The court also noted that, in order to have a conspiracy, at least two people must be involved.

“The jury should have been instructed that if they were satisfied that Mr. Vey did not intend to agree to carry out the common purpose, or if they had a reasonable doubt as to his intention, not only would they be required to acquit Mr. Vey, they would also be required to acquit Ms. Nicholson,” said the court.

Vey and Nicholson were each sentenced to three years in prison. They were released on bail pending their appeal.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

disable

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.