Dunno in which dream you live but Symbian has multitasking since Nokia 7650.
Who needs 74 channels polyphonic??? Nobody listens to midi when he can have MP3.
Memory Sticks are expensive. With MMCs you get more mem for less money.
6630 also got a 1.3 MP camera + with S700i-like quality (although not rotatable).
Accessories for 6630: Real flashlight, keyboard, videocall-stand.
Unlimited possibilities (answering machine, spycam, motion detector, console-emulator, weblogger, ...) by installing new symbian programs.

yes hmmm v800 or 6630? and for me v800 built quality is better than 6630.
Posted by mkoster
The N6630 can't top the V800. The V800 is superior to any Nokia I have seen, even the 6630. More design, more features and no lame Series 60 with dozens of menu's to go through.

And the V800 doesn't have the software problems that every Nokia seems to have that reaches the market. The V800 has the real Bluetooth inside with all available features and not some Nokia propriatary Bluetoothstack implementation that conflicts with other brands.

No... the V800 is by far the superior phone.
Posted by david1975
the way in which the nokia wins well in the uk anyway is i cant for the life of me think that people in the uk are going to walk down the street and look at their phones to make a call you will look a complete fool nokia knows this that is the purpose of the seperate video stand
Posted by Leks
How much would you pay for a 6630? I think expansys 628Â£ is pretty much...
Posted by 701
U can find 6630 at telia.se for 1kr with subscription and approx 330 euros without it..but r they locked?:-D
Posted by Melik
I hate the 3650/3660/6630 Style, they are all the Same But the V800, ... How could i say - It's Sexy !!

But in My country, the 6630 will for sure sell more than the V800

I don't even know, maybe it won't come to Turkey...
Posted by Axe
After seeing the image quality of the V800 (which I was highly dissapointed in and stopped me from buying it) I am currently considering the Nokia which has a very good price too (as said above). I do not think that anyone can complain about its picture quality?

Quote:

On 2004-11-14 15:44:23, mkoster wrote:
V800 has the real Bluetooth inside with all available features and not some Nokia propriatary Bluetoothstack implementation that conflicts with other brands.

What do you mean by the statement above? Is Nokias Bluetooth ablities worse than Sony Ericsson's? Also, will I be able to use my Sony Ericsson Bluetoth headset with a Nokia 6630? Does anybody know?

Has anybody seen an English review of it? If so, please post it here! Does anyone know if the 6630 supports MP3 ringtones? I saw these two programs being included:
Printer module from HP
Kodak Mobile imaging printing
What do they do, and how does it work, anyone?

A little list of good and bad things about the Nokia 6630 compared to the Sony Ericsson V800.

Cons:
Not very good looking...
No inwards camera
No light
No infrared port

Does anybody think something more or different? I am happy to get opinions helping me to decide...

I am actually quite fond of Sony Ericsson but the camera ruined it for me (and some other small things as well). Again, Why dosen't SE make a perfect phone? The image quality and price is what makes me want the Nokia now. Then I can use it until there is a new Sony Ericsson that I can be really happy with.

[ This Message was edited by: Axe on 2004-11-14 18:16 ]Posted by p900 lover
the v800 is much better than the 6630. to begin with it looks much better, which it seems to me that all nokia users care about.
Posted by Axe
I totally agree on the looks but what else? Everywhere I look where these two phones are fighting, it is always the design that comes up. I like Sony Ericsson, I do, but I doubt a little here...
Posted by deuxani
If you want to buy a phone just for it's design, yeah I would go for the the V800. But that's the only reason in my opinion. The 6630 has endless possibilities due to it's operating system, while the V800 is similar to the T610, K700, S700, etc. (OSwise) SE needs to bring out a smaller and cheaper smartphone, cause the S60 phones are getting more and more populair. SE is missing the boat.

So I would definately go for the 6630! I will never in my life buy a phone which doesn't have a flexible OS like Symbian, Windows Mobile, Linux Mobile, etc. cause a static OS like on the SE phones gets really boring after a couple of months and it just doesn't have enough apps on there. (Like dictionairies, maps, word/powerpoint/excel editors, etc.) I really hope SE will start to join the lowerend (non touchscreen) smartphone war, cause everyones there except them.
Posted by p900 lover
yes if i was goin for a smart fone u would consider the 6630 but i got a p900 which is much better besause of its such screen and ease of input, can u imagin typing and longish (500 word) note on a 6630 keypad??

Posted by Clearday
symbian must have been in phones for flexity...but se phones arent catch this boat...And actually it s the one of the most failure for se...what the management try to do not to accept symbian in their phones?SE700 s superb but no symbian?why?
Posted by shyam335
se badly need a cheap smartphone(s) , they are loosing the battle in that category very badly . I hope uiq3 will solve the problem,but when ?
Posted by Dragonfly_TP
the 6630 is more smart phone than the V800 and it is cheaper and smaller compaired to the v800 open. You can use SD memory cards of upto 2gb for half the money of a 1gb ms duo pro, if the v800 would support pro, but it doesn't.
Posted by Axe

Quote:

On 2004-11-17 12:03:45, Dragonfly_TP wrote:
can use SD memory cards of upto 2gb for half the money of a 1gb ms duo pro, if the v800 would support pro, but it doesn't.

V800 does support PRO duo and 6630 only supports RS-MMC which is available in sizes up to 512 MB, but they are, indeed, cheaper.
Posted by korbindallis

Quote:

On 2004-11-17 17:31:25, Axe wrote:

Quote:

On 2004-11-17 12:03:45, Dragonfly_TP wrote:
can use SD memory cards of upto 2gb for half the money of a 1gb ms duo pro, if the v800 would support pro, but it doesn't.

V800 does support PRO duo and 6630 only supports RS-MMC which is available in sizes up to 512 MB, but they are, indeed, cheaper.

ok so for now 512MB is the most i can use with the 6630 and there will be a larger one like 1Gig in the works
Posted by *Jojo* V800 here !
Posted by TheWhizz_68
6630 here after using one for a few days , top Nokia phone.

Posted by johnmcl7
The 6630 doesn't support RS-MMC, it uses a new DV RS-MMC, it won't work with a normal rs-mmc - this is the biggest downside of the 6630 in my experience.

I have to say I rather like the 6630, I already had a P900 so a P910 was a waste of money and the V800 felt limited to me, I already had a K700 and to me the V800 was just a very expensive jazzed up version - the main appeal to me is the price, I got the 6630 for free whereas the V800 would have cost me 150 pounds. The 6630 has one of the best phone cameras I have seen, the screen may not be 262,000 colours but it's very bright and sharp and although Series 60 is flawed it does have quite a bit of flexibility, I like the image and video editing apps, plus Picodrive is a rather cool emulator.

Given the choice of the P900 and 6630 without having used either, I would take the P900 but right now I'm enjoying the 6630 for a change. Even if the 6630 and V800 were the same price, I would have probably still taken the 6630, the V800 just isn't that great for me - still surprised I'm pleased with a Nokia, but there you go...

John
Posted by zealander
I got the 6630 from work and I have a z800 for personal use, both arrived this week. I still haven't totally got used to both phones and I'm not too sure on which I like more, as this is the first Nokia I've ever used.

I think 6630 is definitely a better business phone, since it has QuickOffice word/excel/ppt-type capabilities. Sync with Outlook Calendar is really easy. MMC is a bonus. Nokia PC Suite isn't fantastic though. It has a lot of girth to it, too. (I call mine Spock, since it kinda reminds me of "Beam me up, Scotty").

The Z800 is definitely a personal phone. One issue i have with it is the sunken keys are a lot harder to press than the 6630 keys.
Posted by zealander
My 6630 keys died; the guy at the the repair shop said that the connectors had started to melt!?!!
But yeah, that's typical Nokia for ya. My SE is still going strong!!
Posted by S4k1s
I'm to tired to read the thread right now .. but maybe this link will help

[ This Message was edited by: S4k1s on 2005-12-16 00:25 ]Posted by mamtaj
Nokia is the best than se
Posted by R34GTR
I would opt for the Nokia 6630 as i like its design and overall i think it is a really good phone.