(WASHINGTON
D.C.) – “On the 29th November,
1947, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution calling for the
establishment of a Jewish State in Eretz-Israel; the General Assembly required
the inhabitants of Eretz-Israel to take such steps as were necessary on their
part for the implementation of that resolution. This recognition by the United
Nations of the right of the Jewish people to establish their State is
irrevocable.” –Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel; May 14,
1948

“Believers are those to whom people said, “The people have
gathered against you, so fear them.” But that merely increased their faith and
they said, “Allah is enough for us and how excellent a Guardian is He.” (Qur’an:
3:173)

The Palestinian Authority, under Mahmoud Abbas, must
immediately stop the limping and lackluster effort and present their resolution
this September to the U.N. General Assembly to recognize a Palestinian State.
This will be the only worthy initiative that the PA has ever adopted since its
founding in which the far majority of the world is supportive.

However Abbas must first and foremost find the courage and
will to sacrifice his status and future much like every Palestinian child
living under the daily brutality of occupation who fearlessly faces an Israeli
tank or bulldozer ready to kill him, his family, or demolish their home and
farm.

Since 1967 all the Palestinians have ever asked is for a
State, albeit divided between the West Bank and Gaza, with East Jerusalem as
their capitol, a mere 22% of their original homeland. Given the never ending
“peace process” they now live on only 14% of their homeland, which is shrinking
rapidly every day.

Time is of the essence for Abbas to quickly submit the
resolution to the U.N. to recognize a Palestinian States regardless of the
threatened Obama need Jewish re-election money Veto.

If Abbas succumbs to fear of failure and fear of American
consequences than Abba Eban’s (late former Israeli Foreign Minister), dictum
that the “Palestinians never lose an opportunity to lose an opportunity”, will
once again prove right.

Unfortunately given Abbas’ past history of buckling under
American pressure the submission of the resolution to recognize a Palestinian State is not certain. For whatever
personal, political, or financial considerations he may have, he has constantly
surrendered to the decade’s long Israeli/American lie that only direct
negotiations between the two parties can lead to a peace settlement, i.e. the
road map to nowhere but whose ultimate aim is to buy time to completely expel
all Palestinians from Palestine.

Case in point: Abbas has previously dropped the endorsement
of the Goldstone Report at the U.N. Human Rights Council that accused Israel
of war crimes and crimes against humanity shocking his people and the entire
world. The leaked “Palestinian Papers” revealed that his government was willing
to concede to all of Israel’s
demands including the surrender of East Jerusalem.

How can anyone in the entire world still believe that Israel with its dominance of the U.S.
Government and foreign policy actually seeks or wants peace with the
Palestinians? What it seeks is all of Palestine
without any Palestinians.

While the majority of the world is eager, supportive, and
sympathetic to the plight of the occupied Palestinians and is willing to
support such a resolution, it is the Palestinians themselves who are as of yet
squabbling internally on the issue while the clock ticks down to ground zero, a
point of no return for the Palestinians.

For Abbas and Palestine’s
future submitting the Resolution to the General Assembly for a recognized state
this September is the single most important moment of truth regarding the
destiny of his people. There must be no choice, no hesitancy, and no fear of
failure but to forcefully and resolutely proceed with the resolution to the
U.N. to recognize a Palestinian State

However if Abbas’ lives up to his usual puppetry to U.S. and
Israeli pressure and forgoes this historical opportunity at the U.N., then two
things will and should happen.

World support for the Palestinians may seriously be
diminished long term with the logic that if Palestinians don’t care about their
own plight and future, why should the world? Palestinian fatigue is already
setting in many quarters of the western world.

A mass uprising of the Palestinian people must occur against
their incompetent leaders in the West Bank and Gaza and hold them accountable for crimes
against humanity against their own people.

What can Israel
do to the Palestinians that it already hasn’t and continues to do?

Palestine’s destiny is up to its people and not for debate,
discussion, and decision by foreign powers. In due time and God willing with a
region wide Arab uprising overthrowing the rule of America’s tyrants it will be
Israel that will sue for peace with the Arab world; having missed the
opportunity for more decades.

The American philosopher William Irwin Thompson said it best
when he wrote: “If you do not create your destiny, you will have your fate
inflicted upon you”

Mr. Abbas and Mr. Meshaal of Hamas, when we all meet our
maker on Judgment Day, how will you explain your failure to seize this
historical moment and seek recognition of a State for your people and the
eventual freedom of an Independent Palestine?

Will you say you feared an American veto or another illegal
settlement? Or will Palestine
remain: “A land without leadership, for a leadership without a land.”

PLEASE Consider Signing the Petition Below to Urge President
Obama to Recognize a Palestinian
State at the United
Nations. Thank you, and please distribute widely.

Mohamed Khodris an American Muslim born in the Middle East. He is political activist who frequently
writes on the plight of Palestinians living under the brutal occupation of Israel, U.S. Foreign Policy, Islam, and
Arab politics.

“Israel [is] not
being isolated because it is a Jewish state and hence illegitimate, but because
of how it treat[s] the Palestinians.”

by Dr. Lawrence Davidson

Part I

On 24 June 2011 MJ Rosenberg published an interesting piece
entitled “Netanyahu Is the One ‘Delegitimizing’ Israel.”
Deligitimization as used here is, according to Israel’s Haaretz newspaper, a “buzzword in the world of pro-Israel
activism.” Rosenberg tries to turn the concept
back on the Zionists by claiming it is their own actions that are actually
eroding Israel’s
legitimacy. He is correct but there is more to be said on this topic. First,
some additional background information.

In 2010 the Zionists decided they would try to split the
opposition by defining different categories of criticism of Israel. Those who are critical of
just particulars, this or that Israel
policy or tactic, were put in the category of acceptable critics. I would point
out that this was a big concession on their part for, if you think back ten
years or so, any public criticism of Israel was assumed to be inspired
by anti-Semitism. In any case, that charge has now been narrowed down to those
assigned to a second category–the “delegitimizers.” These are the ones who,
allegedly, are critical in a way that calls into question the right of Israel
to exist as a Jewish state.

According to the Zionists, this delegitimizing approach is,
so to speak, beyond the pale, or as the American Zionist leader William Daroff put it, a “cancerous growth.”

The Zionists have gone to a lot of trouble to make this
process of categorization appear well thought out and researched. In March of
2010 the Tel Aviv based Reut Institute issued a 92 page report which defines
delegitimizing criticism as that which “exhibits blatant double standards,
singles out Israel, denies its right to exist as the embodiment of the
self-determination of the Jewish people, or demonizes the state.” .

Rosenberg says this effort on the part of the Zionists is a
gambit “to change the subject from the existence of the occupation to the
existence of Israel…That is why Prime Minister Netanyahu routinely invokes
Israel’s ‘right of self-defense’ every time he tries to explain away some
Israeli attack on Palestinians…If the whole Israeli-Palestinian discussion is
about Israel’s right to defend itself, Israel wins the argument. But if it is
about the occupation–which is, in fact, what the conflict has been about since
1993 when the PLO recognized Israel–it loses.” He concludes, “Israel [is] not being isolated
because it is a Jewish state and hence illegitimate, but because of how it
treat[s] the Palestinians.”

Part II

Rosenberg
certainly has a point. However, one can draw a more general and troublesome
message from the debate about Israel
and delegitimization. This more basic insight goes like this:

1. The
distinction drawn by the Zionists between acceptable and unacceptable criticism
works only if one assumes that the policies and tactics of the Israeli state
leading to, on the one hand, expansion into the Occupied Territories (OT), and
on the other, the segregation of its non-Jewish minorities, are not structural.

Or, to put it another way, that Israel’s
imperial and discriminatory policies are not a function of the ethno/religious
definition of the state. But what happens if Israel’s tactics and polices are
not just opportunistic, but indeed structural?What if the behavior of the
government flows from the very nature of a country designed first and foremost
for a specific group? If that is the case, you cannot separate out criticism of
this or that policy from criticism of the very character of the Israeli polity.
The state and its behavior are inseparable.

Please note that I am not singling out Israel in this regard (though, as
we will see, I do single it out in other ways). Actually, it would not matter
if Israel
(or any other country) was Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, White, Black,
American, English, Russian, Chinese, or created by and for little green men
from Mars. If any state:

a) is designed to first and foremost serve one
specific group while,

b) having in its midst minorities which it systematically
segregates by,

c) either structuring its laws in a discriminatory way, and/or
purposely educating its citizenry to act in a discriminatory fashion,

d) then
from the standpoint of civilized, modern democratic principles, one can justly
question not only its tactics and policies, but the legitimacy of the
social/political structure that generated them.

This is so whether the country is expansionist or not. In
other words, if Israel
had never moved beyond its 1967 borders and never set up its wretched colonial
regime in the OT, there would still be a problem because of the way it treats
Israeli Arabs. Here is where I would take the Rosenberg argument one step further. It is
not just the occupation, it is Zionism as a guiding socio-political ideology
that is illegitimate.,

2. Given the ideological insistence that Israel must be a “Jewish” state, how does one
argue against Zionist Israel
without opening oneself to the charge of anti-Semitism? The best way to do so
is by generalizing out Rosenberg’s
argument – by taking the general position that all governments that use their
laws to discriminate against minority groups delegitimize themselves. In the
case of Zionist Israel
(which, we should keep in mind, does not represent all Jews) just ceasing to
behave in an imperialist fashion may be necessary, but it is not a sufficient
corrective. Israel
must cease to structure its laws and social behavior in a discriminatory
fashion and for that it has to get rid of its present Zionist governing
ideology. If Israel
wants to be both Jewish and a legitimate, civilized, modern democratic state,
it has to find a non-discriminatory way to do it. As long as it stays a Zionist
state, it will constantly be hoisting itself with its own petard.,

3. Beyond
Israel’s borders, it is the Zionist political and media efforts to convince
world opinion that they must be considered both legitimate and be allowed to
operate in a discriminatory fashion that are particularly corrupting. To
explain this lets address the Zionist charge that deligitimizers “single out Israel” by
using “blatant double standards.”

This assertion has become so common that when one ventures
into a public forum to discuss Israeli behavior, one is almost assured the
following question: Why are you singling out Israel? How about all those other
countries doing horrible things to people? How about the Russians slaughtering
Chechynians?How about the Chinese committing cultural genocide against Tibet? What
about Darfur? If you think about it, the
question is an unfortunate one from the point of view of those asking because,
implicitly, it (quite accurately) puts Israel into the same category as all
these other bad guys and that certainly is not what the questioner intends. In
any case, there is a ready answer to the question and it goes like this: The
fact that Zionist influence spreads far beyond Israel’s area of dominion and
has long influenced many of the policy making institutions of Western
governments, and particularly that of the United States, makes it imperative
that Israel’s oppressive behavior be singled out as a high priority case from
among the many other oppressive regimes that may be candidates for pointed
criticism and even boycott. In other words, unlike the Chinese, the Russians
and other such governments, the Israelis and their supporters directly
influence, in a corrupting fashion, the policy makers of our own countries and
this often makes our governments accomplices in Israel’s abusive policies. This
being so, singling out Israel
is not hypocrisy, but rather necessity. William Daroff, the Zionist leader
mentioned above who appears on the look out for “cancerous growths,” might find
this pathology in the on-going corruptive nature of his own organization’s
influence.

Part III

From the standpoint of intellectual debate it is not
difficult to defeat Zionist arguments. I have been doing it for years both in
writing and in public forums. I humbly admit that (where they have not turned
into bedlam) I have never lost one of these encounters. However, international
affairs and the fate of nations are not normally settled by intellectual
debates. Nor, unfortunately, are they often settled by international law.
Historically, they are settled by political intrigue and back room lobbying (at
which level Zionist influence works) and/or brute force.

Is there a way around this historical roadblock? I think so.
There is a growing, world-wide movement of civil society seeking the isolation
of Israel
at all levels. This is the same strategy that brought change to apartheid South Africa.
And, toward the growth of this movement, intellectual debate is very useful and
important. It is no accident that the Zionists point to those who advocate
boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel as the number one enemies
within their category of delegitimizers. I think they know, or at least sense,
that the BDS movement is the very best long term strategy for those who wish to
force Israel to rid itself of what makes it truly illegitimate– its Zionist
ideology.

**************************

DR. LAWRENCE DAVIDSONis professor of Middle East history at
West Chester University in West Chester, PA, and the author of America’s
Palestine: Popular and Official Perceptions from Balfour to Israeli Statehood
(University of Florida Press, 2001), Islamic Fundamentalism (Greenwood Press, 2003),
and Foreign Policy, Inc.: Privatizing American National Interest (University of
Kentuck Press, 2009).

This week the United States Senate unanimously adopted a
resolution drafted by its masters, the State of Israel and AIPAC, to prevent
the United Nations, of which the United States is a member, from exercising its
constitutional rights to free speech to deliberate on the recognition of a
Palestinian State. The resolution is an exercise in coercion since its intent
is to withhold funding from the Palestinian Authority should the UN deliberate
on such a resolution of recognition, making the UN responsible for depriving
the Palestinian people of America’s support.

Given the reality of what is euphemistically called
“negotiations for peace” or the “Israeli/Palestinian peace process,” that have
been on-going for approximately 50 years with no results: no peace, no
Palestinian state, no equity of living conditions, no acceptance of proposals
to enforce terms negotiated, no borders established for either state, and no
expectation of results, it would appear to most people of common sense that the
process is flawed. To have America
act as a broker for peace limiting the participants to Israeli and Palestinian
negotiators is futile at best since the US is not an objective broker nor
could it be. Delay benefits the partner in the process that wields the power;
that is Israel.
Palestinians suffer and die as the years go by and the world waits, wonders and
watches with indifference.

It occurred to me, therefore, that Senate Resolution 185 needs
some alterations, alterations that might be possible if our Senators were not
shackled by their masters to unanimously adopt a continuation of the idiocy
that maintains a status quo demanded by the Israelis but not their negotiating
partners, the Palestinians. Hence I offer the following changes as a small
measure of sense into a process marked by ceaseless nonsense.

Excerpts from S. Res. 185, approved by the U.S. Senate on
Tuesday: Whereas a true and lasting peace between the people of Israel and the
Palestinians can only be achieved through direct negotiations between the
parties as the past 44 years of such negotiations clearly demonstrates;

Whereas Hamas, an organization responsible for the death of
more than 500 innocent civilians, including two dozen United States citizens,
has been designated by the United States Government as a foreign terrorist
organization, while Israel, an organization responsible for the deaths of 6,430
innocent Palestinian civilians including 1463 children since September of 2000,
and 45,041 injured, has not been designated a foreign terrorist state;

Whereas Hamas has demolished no Israeli homes while Israel
has destroyed 24,873 Palestinian homes, and while Israel has built 236 illegal
settlements on confiscated Palestinian land and Hamas has built none on Israeli
land;

Whereas the United States has provided Israel 9 million a
day in 2011 for military assistance to ensure that it maintain the fourth
largest military in the world to protect 6 million people while the US has the
largest to protect 310 million and provides Hamas with nothing;

Whereas Israel
has refused to designate borders to define its state and unilaterally
confiscates any Palestinian land it desires while the land belonging to the
Palestinians has shrunk to less than 14% of its original area; Whereas, on April 22, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton stated, “We will not deal with nor in any way fund a Palestinian
government that includes Hamas (despite our expressed desire in 2006 to see
Hamas become a credible political party in Palestine, and despite our on-going
support of democracy in the mid-east acknowledging that Hamas’ victory at the
polls, witnessed by UN observers, was recognized by the nations of the world as
fulfilling the goals of a free people choosing their representatives, despite
our expressed desires to see democracy in action in Palestine), we assert at
this time that unless and until Hamas has renounced violence, recognized Israel
and agreed to follow the previous obligations of the Palestinian Authority
(even though we do not require that Israel renounce violence as the statistics
above attest, nor do we require that Israel recognize the existence of a state
for Palestinians nor accept its obligations as a member state of the UN to
refrain from illegal land confiscation, return the land it has acquired
illegally under international law and rejoin the community of nations of which
it should be apart.”);

Therefore, be it Resolved, that the Senate—baffled by the
inherent contradictions imbedded in this resolution adopts the following
resolution: Reaffirms its strong support for a negotiated solution to
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in two states, a democratic, Jewish
state of Israel and a viable, democratic Palestinian state, living side-by-side
in peace, security, and mutual recognition; Affirms the necessity that a new peace process be created to
be undertaken by the United Nations through an established authorized committee
of its membership exclusive of the United States but with equitable
representation of other nations including those with Arab populations;

Affirms the absolute necessity of a United Nations vote to
recognize a Palestinian state prior to the creation of the UN Committee
described above so that both Israel and Palestine enter the negotiations on an
equal footing using the UN established 1967 borders as a base for negotiations
in accordance with the President’s wishes; Calls upon the President to announce that the United States
will not veto any resolution on Palestinian statehood that comes before the
United Nations Security Council as a demonstration of America’s good will to
bring a coordinated and internationally accepted resolution to the crisis in
Israel and Palestine;

Affirms its intentions by announcing in advance that the
United States will provide financial support for the development of a
Palestinian state that will make it a viable member of the nations united for
peace in the world; and Will consider restrictions on aid to the state of
Israel should it interfere with the recognition of a Palestinian State as
adopted by the UN.

In all fairness to those who have not been able to see
Senate Resolution 185, since our main stream media choose to omit such items
lest the American people become informed, I offer below the resolution as
presented by Daily Alert, an organ of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
on behalf of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations.

Needless to say, AIPAC has been at the forefront of efforts
to ensure that its Knesset passed Resolution 185; here’s how.

AIPAC News

Thousands of AIPAC Activists Ascend Capitol Hill to Lobby

“In a resounding show
of support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship, thousands of AIPAC Policy
Conference elegates (sic) from all 50 states ascended Capitol Hill on Tuesday
to conduct more than 500 lobbying meetings with members of Congress and their
staff. At the top of the lobbying agenda was U.S.
security assistance to Israel
– the most tangible expression of American support for the Jewish state.” Where
is the American peoples’ voice? I suggest that to be or not to be American
would be answered if this resolution were reconsidered.

Excerpts from S. Res. 185, approved by the U.S. Senate on Tuesday: Whereas a true and lasting peace between the people of Israel
and the Palestinians can only be achieved through direct negotiations between
the parties; Whereas Hamas, an organization responsible for the death of
more than 500 innocent civilians, including two dozen United States citizens,
has been designated by the United States Government as a foreign terrorist
organization; Whereas, on April 22, 2009, Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton stated, “We will not deal with nor in any way fund a Palestinian
government that includes Hamas unless and until Hamas has renounced violence,
recognized Israel
and agreed to follow the previous obligations of the Palestinian Authority.”

Therefore, be it Resolved, that the Senate – Reaffirms its strong support for a negotiated solution to
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict resulting in two states, a democratic, Jewish
state of Israel and a viable, democratic Palestinian state, living side-by-side
in peace, security, and mutual recognition; Reiterates its strong opposition to
any attempt to establish or seek recognition of a Palestinian state outside of
an agreement negotiated between leaders in Israel and the Palestinians;

Calls upon the President to announce that the United States
will veto any resolution on Palestinian statehood that comes before the United
Nations Security Council which is not a result of agreements reached between
the Government of Israel and the Palestinians;

Will consider restrictions on
aid to the Palestinian Authority should it persist in efforts to circumvent
direct negotiations by turning to the United Nations or other international
bodies.

**********************************

William A. Cook, Ph.D.is Professor of English at the University of La Verne
in southern California.
His most recent book, The Plight of the Palestinians: a Long History of
Destruction is now available at Macmillan publishing or through Amazon and
other book sellers. He can be reached at wcook@laverne.edu or www.drwilliamacook.com

BB: Slideshows

BB: Poetry and Fiction - Click on picture

BB: Quotes from the TALMUD

BB: Talmudic Quotes

RESPONSE: The above quote is a wrong inference from a fiscal law in Shulchan Oruch, Choshen Mishpat 405.3, that relates to times when slavery was a standard and accepted practice across the world.

BLOGGER: Response is BS. Even during the time mentioned above, the quote of Talmud, which is supposed to be a holy book, should not be as it is.

CLAIM 02: "It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile." Sepher ikkarim III c 25.

RESPONSE: This is a misquotation. Rabbi Yosef Albo (the author) was asked by a Christian thinker about seeming injustice of the laws of Judaism dealing with charging interest on a loan. (According to Deuteronomy 23:20 and 23:21, a Jew is not allowed to lend with interest to another Jew, but may do so to a Gentile).

R. Albo answers: The "Gentile" or "heathen" in the above passage refers to idolater, who refuses to keep seven Noahide laws. The laws are universal for all mankind: A) prohibition of idolatry, B) prohibition of blasphemy, C) prohibition of murder, D) prohibition of immorality and promiscuity, E) prohibition of theft, F) establishment of judicial system, G) prohibition of cruelty to animals.

Such a person, who does not respect other's rights, places himself apart from human community and therefore can expect to be treated according to his own rules. He is a threat to everyone around and hence if somebody kills him, that person is not charged. On the contrary, even according to non-Jewish philosophers in those days (14th and 15th century, Spain), as R Albo brings, such a person should be killed. So it is regarding money matters: the prohibition of taking interest, that applies to everybody, including a non-Jew who keeps the Noahide laws (as R. Albo mentions a few sentences earlier), do not apply to him.

BLOGGER: What a crackpot full of steaming shit. First, an idolater is not obliged to follow the Nohide laws. Second, even if he is, but violates them all or part thereof, he does not deserve to be killed by someone. Third, one can not just kill someone who has a different belief. Anybody is free to believe in whatever he wants as far as no harm isdone to those living around him when the belief is carried out into action.

CLAIM 03: "It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of theTorah." Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425.

RESPONSE: This is from the Shulcan Aruch and applies to killing Jewish heretics. The following line in this passage is that this law does not apply to anyone non-Jewish and it is forbidden to harm any gentile. The Jewish heretics are people which are a potential cause of harm and trouble to the Jewish nation. The penalty is designed to demonstrate the severity with which heretical views were considered, rather than a practical penalty as such penalties were rarely imposed. E.S./David S. Maddison.

BLOGGER: The quote says, “anyone who denies the Torah”, then immediately followed by, “The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.” I cannot find any reference to Jewish heretics, or “it is forbidden to harm any gentile”. Response is nothing but hogwash.

BB: Monthly news of rabbis sexual perversion & other crimes.

Click on picture!

BB: Pervert Rabbis

BB: Cases of shame

CASES OF SHAME: What is a rabbi?

The word "Rabbi" refers to one of the ancient scribes - supposedly a holy man - who participated in writing the "Talmud". In Arabic, which is a Semitic language and a cousin to Hebrew, the word is"Rabbanie", or "Rabbie", means a godly man. My question is, are they really godly? I strongly doubt that. Below are some of their news…

Israel's new Ashkenazi chief rabbi case: JERUSALEM: Israel's new Ashkenazi chief rabbi is facing growing calls to step down amid allegations of misconduct. The allegations center on sexual harassment charges against Yona Metzger, as well as charges that he engaged in fraud and is not qualified for the post. Aides to Metzger have rejected the allegations as a smear campaign fueled by political rivals.

Metzger and his Sephardi counterpart, Rabbi Shlomo Amar, were elected as Israel's chief rabbis April 14 by a 150-member public committee. Since then, however,opposition to Metzger has grown. In the latest development, a Tel Aviv accountant filed a petition Monday in the High Court of Justice challenging Metzger's appointment. It will be heard by a three-judge panel.

The petition claims that allegations of fraud and other improprieties involving Metzger were not fully investigated because of his 1998 pledge not to stand for chief rabbi of Tel Aviv. Metzger's spokesman, Roni Rimon, told the Israeli daily Ma'ariv that the petition was full of "lies, lies and more lies" produced by "professional slanderers.". Metzger had been accused of forging witnesses' signatures on marriage contracts and unlawfully demanding payment for performing weddings, the daily Ha'aretz reported. As a result of the allegations, Metzger's permit to serve as a chief rabbi of a major city was revoked. However, it was reinstated several months later after a hearing before three senior Israeli rabbis -- including Eliyahu Bakshi - Doron, a former Sephardi chief rabbi -- who accepted Metzger's explanations and his commitment to leave the Tel Aviv race, the paper said.

The petition also argues that the Metzger, 50, who previously was rabbi of north Tel Aviv, was not qualified tofill the chief rabbi's duties as head of the country's rabbinic court system because he never had been a religious judge or rabbi of a major city. Thepetition maintained that the elections committee for the chief rabbi was not adequately informed of the misconduct allegations against Metzger. In related development, Ma'ariv recently published what it said were sexual harassment allegations involving Metzger. Three weeks before Metzger's election as chiefrabbi, the paper reported, it learned of complaints from four adult men whoclaimed Metzger had touched their arms, legs and chests and expressed admiration for their muscular physiques.

Park Avenue rabbi Case:A prominent Park Avenue rabbi had a mistress nearly half his age sign a bizarre cohabitation contract - promising she’d get liposuction, become better educated and continue their already hot-and-heavy sexual relationship in exchange for half his house, the woman claims in a bombshell lawsuit. Janet Pizzo says she had a seven-year affair with the married Metropolitan Synagogue Rabbi Joel Goor - which included recurring steamy sex in his rabbinical office while he lied to his wife about his whereabouts. But their courtship crumbled when she suspected him of having another girlfriend, and he’s since become vindictive. She even caught him on audio tape threatening to prance around their Bronxhome naked in front of her 17-year-old daughter.

You’ve got to move,” Goor says, according to an audio tape reviewed by The Post. “This is my house . . . I’m allowed to walk around nude in my house. So you better tell [her daughter] Mary,” Goor told Pizzo.“I’m allowed to walk round this house . . . and I’m going to.”. Goor’s lawyer declined to comment on the allegations. “I truly loved this guy, I really did,” said a weepy Pizzo, 48, complaining how the 73-year-old Man of God locked her out of their bedroom, removed the cushions from her couch and vowed to unplug the refrigerator. http://www.canonist.com/?p=1245

Zionist Israel

1.
"There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies, not just in
ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are
our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters
away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but
actually belong to a different galaxy." Israeli president Moshe Katsav.
The Jerusalem
Post, May 10, 2001

2.
"The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they
want more".... Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time - August
28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem
Post August 30, 2000

3.
" [The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs." Menahim Begin,
speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the
Beasts". New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

4.
"The Palestinians" would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads
smashed against the boulders and walls." Isreali Prime Minister (at
the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988

5.
"When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it
will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle." Raphael
Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April
1983.

6.
"How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return
them to." Golda Maier, March 8, 1969.

7.
"There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed." Golda
Maier Israeli Prime Minister June 15, 1969

8.
"The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967
and that Israel
was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed
after the war." Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.

9.
David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): "If I were an Arab
leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken
their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest
them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler,
Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see
but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they
accept that?" Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish
Paradox), pp121.

10.
Ben Gurion also warned in 1948 : "We must do everything to insure they (
the Palestinians) never do return." Assuring his fellow Zionists that
Palestinians will never come back to their homes. "The old will die and
the young will forget."

11.
"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live
here as slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of
General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

12.
"Every time we do something you tell me America
will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear:
Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people,
control America,
and the Americans know it." - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon,
October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. (Certainly
the FBI's cover-up of the Israeli spy ring/phone
tap scandal suggests that Mr. Sharon may not have been joking.)

13.
"We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one
centimeter of Eretz Israel...
Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until
the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." Rafael Eitan, Chief of
Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces - Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983,
New York Times 14 April 1983.

14.
"We must do everything to ensure they [the Palestinian refugees] never do
return" David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael
Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.

15." ... we should prepare to go over to the offensive with the aim of
smashing Lebanon,
Trans-jordan and Syria...
The weak point in the Arab coalition is Lebanon [for] the Moslem regime is
artificial and easy to undermine. A Christian state should be established...
When we smash the [Arab] Legions strength and bomb Amman,
we will eliminate Transjordan, too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria, and Cairo." " David
Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by
Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte,
New York 1978.

16.
"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and
the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee
of its Arab population." Israel
Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"

17."Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even
know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography
books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are
not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the
place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in
the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country
that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address to the
Technion, Haifa,
reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.

18.
"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his
question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved
his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" Yitzhak Rabin, leaked
censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October
1979.

19.Rabin's description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan
Dalet. "We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters
and waiters" Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion's special adviser on Arab Affairs,
1960. From "The Arabs in Israel"
by Sabri Jiryas.

20.
"There are some who believe that the non-Jewish population, even in a high
percentage, within our borders will be more effectively under our surveillance;
and there are some who believe the contrary, i.e., that it is easier to carry
out surveillance over the activities of a neighbor than over those of a tenant.
[I] tend to support the latter view and have an additional argument:...the need
to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish...with a
non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this
fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary."
Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From Israel: an Apartheid State
by Uri Davis, p.5.

21.
"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to
enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours...
Everything we don't grab will go to them." Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign
Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet
Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.

22.
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly
and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The
first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State
without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands."
Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.

23.
"Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it
employment... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor
must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." Theodore Herzl, founder
of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete
Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.

25.
"We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing
you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we
want a world of our own." (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels,
p. 155).

26.
"We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only
question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or
consent." (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified
before the U.S. Senate).

27.
"We will establish ourselves in Palestine
whether you like it or not...You can hasten our arrival or you can equally
retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our
constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow
the world." (Chaim Weizmann, Published in "Judische Rundschau,"
No. 4, 1920)

28.
"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as
different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared
to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races
are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior
races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The
masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." - Israeli prime
Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset [Israeli Parliament] quoted
by Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the Beasts," New Statesman, June 25,
1982

29.
"Tell me, do the evil men of this world have a bad time? They hunt and
catch whatever they feel like eating. They don't suffer from indigestion and
are not punished by Heaven. I want Israel to join that club. Maybe the
world will then at last begin to fear us instead of feeling sorry. Maybe they
will start to tremble, to fear our madness instead of admiring our nobility.
Let them tremble; let them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are
a savage country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go
wild, that we might start World War Three just like that, or that we might one
day go crazy and burn all the oil fields in the Middle East. Even if you'll
prove to me that the present war is a dirty immoral war, I don't care. We shall
start another war, kill and destroy more and more. And do you know why it is
all worth it? Because it seems that this war has made us more unpopular among
the civilized world.We'll hear no more of that nonsense about the unique Jewish
morality. No more talk about a unique people being a light upon the nations. No
more uniqueness and no more sweetness and light. Good riddance." -- Former
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon

30.
"The Modern Age is the Jewish Age, and the twentieth century, in
particular, is the Jewish Century." -Yuri Slezkine, Professor of History
at University of California,
Berkeley, "The Jewish Century"; Princeton University Press

31.
"What shocks and worries me is the narrow-mindedness and the
shortsightedness of our military leaders. They seem to presume that the State
of Israel may or even must-behave in the realm of international relations
according to the laws of the jungle- -the long chain of false incidents and
hostilities we have invented, and so many clashes we have provoked;" - From
Diary of Moshe Sharett, former Primer Minister of Israel in Livia Rokach,
Israel's Sacred Terrorism published 980

32.Hebrew essayist Achad Ha-Am, after paying a visit to Palestine in 1891:
"Abroad we are accustomed to believe that Israel is almost empty; nothing
is grown here and that whoever wishes to buy land could come here and buy what
his heart desires. In reality, the situation is not like this. Throughout the
country it is difficult to find cultivable land which is not already
cultivated."

33.The Balfour Declaration to Baron Rothchild, on the 2nd of November, 1917:
"His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine
of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to
facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political
status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

34.Lord Sydenham, Hansard, House of Lords, 21 June 1922: "If we are going to
admit claims on conquest thousands of years ago, the whole world will have to
be turned upside down."

35.1923:Vladimir Jabotinsky, The Iron Wall, "Zionist colonization must
either be terminated or carried out against the wishes of the native
population. This colonization can, therefore, be continued and make progress
only under the protection of a power independent of the native population - an
iron wall, which will be in a position to resist the pressure to the native
population. This is our policy towards the Arabs..."

36.
Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism (precursor of Likud), The
Iron Wall, 1923: "A voluntary reconciliation with the Arabs is out of the
question either now or in the future. If you wish to colonize a land in which
people are already living, you must provide a garrison for the land, or find
some rich man or benefactor who will provide a garrison on your behalf. Or
else-or else, give up your colonization, for without an armed force which will
render physically impossible any attempt to destroy or prevent this colonization,
colonization is impossible, not difficult, not dangerous, but IMPOSSIBLE!...
Zionism is a colonization adventure and therefore it stands or falls by the
question of armed force. It is important... to speak Hebrew, but,
unfortunately, it is even more important to be able to shoot - or else I am
through with playing at colonizing."

38.
Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department in 1940. From
"A Solution to the Refugee Problem": "Between ourselves it must
be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We
shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no
other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries - all
of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left."

39.Israeli official Arthur Lourie in a letter to Walter Eytan, director general of
the Israeli Foreign Ministry (ISA FM 2564/22). From Benny Morris, "The
Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem 1947-49", p. 297: "...if
people become accustomed to the large figure and we are actually obliged to
accept the return of the refugees, we may find it difficult, when faced with
hordes of claimants, to convince the world that not all of these formerly lived
in Israeli territory. It would, in any event, seem desirable to minimize the
numbers...than otherwise."

40.David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben- Gurion, A
Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte,
New York 1978: "We should
prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak
point is Lebanon,
for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish
a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate
Trans-Jordan; Syria
will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port
Said, Alexandria
and Sinai."

41.BenDavid -Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel,
described Zionist aims in 1948: "A Christian state should be established
[in Lebanon],
with its southern border on the Litani river. We will make an alliance with it.
When we smash the Arab Legion's strength and bomb Amman,
we will eliminate Transjordan too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo... And in this
fashion, we will end the war and settle our forefathers' account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram"

42.
[Begin, and Yitzhak Shamir who were members of the party became Prime
Ministers.] Albert Einstein, Hanna Arendt and other prominent Jewish Americans,
writing in The New York Times, protest the visit to America of Menachem Begin,
December 1948: "Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our time
is the emergence in the newly created State of Israel of the Freedom Party
(Herut), a political party closely akin in its organization, method, political
philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties."

43.Martin Buber, Jewish Philosopher, addressed Prime Minister Ben Gurion on the
moral character of the state of Israel
with reference to the Arab refugees in March 1949. "We will have to face
the reality that Israel
is neither innocent, nor redemptive. And that in its creation, and expansion;
we as Jews, have caused what we historically have suffered; a refugee
population in Diaspora."

44.Moshe Dayan (Israel
Defense and Foreign Minister), on February 12 1952. Radio "Israel.":
"It lies upon the people's shoulders to prepare for the war, but it lies
upon the Israeli army to carry out the fight with the ultimate object of
erecting the Israeli Empire."

45.Martin Buber, to a NewYork audience, Jewish
Newsletter, June 2, 1958: "When we [followers of the prophetic Judaism]
returned to Palestine...the
majority of Jewish people preferred to learn from Hitler rather than from
us."

46.Aba Eban (the Israeli Foreign Minister) stated arrogantly. New York Times June
19, 1967: "If the General Assembly were to vote by 121 votes to 1 in favor
of "Israel"
returning to the armistice lines-- (pre June 1967 borders) "Israel"
would refuse to comply with the decision."

47.Dr. Israel Shahak, Chairperson of the Israeli League for Human and Civil
Rights, and a survivor of the Bergen Belsen concentration camp, Commenting on
the Israeli military's Emergency Regulations following the 1967 War. Palestine, vol. 12,
December 1983: "Hitler's legal power was based upon the 'Enabling Act',
which was passed quite legally by the Reichstag and which allowed the Fuehrer
and his representatives, in plain language, to be what they wanted, or in legal
language, to issue regulations having the force of law. Exactly the same type
of act was passed by the Knesset [Israeli's Parliament] immediately after the
1067 conquest granting the Israeli governor and his representatives the power
of Hitler, which they use in Hitlerian manner."

48.
Joseph Weitz, Director of the Jewish National Fund, the Zionist agency charged
with acquiring Palestinian land, Circa 194. Machover Israca, January 5, 1973
/p.2: "The only solution is Eretz Israel
[Greater Israel], or at least Western Eretz Israel
[all the land west of Jordan River], without
Arabs. There is no room for compromise on this point ... We must not leave a
single village, not a single tribe."

49.
Israeli Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Inferring that killing isn't murder if the
victim is Gentile. Jerusalem Post, June 19,1989: "Jewish blood and a goy's
[gentile's] blood are not the same."

50.Benyamin Netanyahu, then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister, former Prime Minister
of Israel, tells students at Bar Ilan University,
From the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989: "Israel should have exploited the repression of
the demonstrations in China,
when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions
among the Arabs of the territories."

51.
Former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir declares at a Tel Aviv memorial service
for former Likud leaders, November 1990. Jerusalem
Domestic Radio Service: "The past leaders of our movement left us a clear
message to keep Eretz Israel
from the Sea to the Jordan River for future
generations, for the mass aliya [immigration], and for the Jewish people, all
of whom will be gathered into this country."

52.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, quoted in Associated Press, November 16,
2000: "If we thought that instead of 200 Palestinian fatalities, 2,000
dead would put an end to the fighting at a stroke, we would use much more
force...."

53.Ben Gurion: In 1899, Davis Triestsch wrote to Herzl: " I would suggest to
you to come round in time to the "Greater Palestine" program before
it is too late... the Basle program must contain the words "Great
Palestine" or "Palestine and its neighboring lands" otherwise
it's nonsense. You do not get ten million Jews into a land of 25,000 Km2".
" The present map of Palestine
was drawn by the British mandate. The Jewish people have another map which our
youth and adults should strive to fulfill -- From the Nile to the Euphrates."

54.Vladimir Jabotinsky (the founder and advocate of the Zionist terrorist
organizations), Quoted by Maxime Rodinson in Peuple Juif ou Problem Juif.
(Jewish People or Jewish Problem): "Has any People ever been seen to give
up their territory of their own free will? In the same way, the Arabs of
Palestine will not renounce their sovereignty without violence."

We
enthusiastically chose to become a colonial society, ignoring international
treaties, expropriating lands, transferring settlers from Israel to the
occupied territories, engaging in theft and finding justification for all these
activities. Passionately desiring to keep the occupied territories, we
developed two judicial systems: one - progressive, liberal - in Israel; and the
other - cruel, injurious - in the occupied territories. In effect, we
established an apartheid regime in the occupied territories immediately
following their capture. That oppressive regime exists to this day.

BB: MOSSAD

BB: ADAM YAHIYE GADAHN: A Jew who pretended to have converted to Islam assumed different aliases.

BB:They Pretended to have converted to Islam, and started talking violently to smear Islam Muslims.

BB: They call themselves Jews though their ancestors never set foot in Palestine.

Our Little Earth - May We All Be Blessed!

Visitors Map

Flag Counter

Disclaimer

This blog is a personal blog written and edited by I, Aadel M
Al-Mahdy. For questions about this blog, please contact: Almahdyalerts@gmail.com. This blog
does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. I
write for my own purposes. However, I may be influenced by my background;
occupation, religion, political attitude or experience.The owner of this blog
will never receive compensation in any way from this blog, neither will he be
compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various
other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog
owner's. If I claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or
service area, I will only endorse products or services that I believe, based on
my expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic,
quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified
with the manufacturer or provider.This blog does not contain any content which
might present a conflict of interest.