I don't see a way to grab all the relevant posts and create a "clean" idea thread for the "URL for Review" discussion. This is my first time attempting the Fork function. Give me a few minutes to work on it.

ACT_1:I've posted 26 Idea threads, and rarely had a reply from staff. Never has staff said "great idea, we're working on it right now." Or even "it's in the queue for implementation" (that I recall).

I've found Ideas that I liked, and even one over 5 years old that had 100+ votes, but no staff reply.I've found some Ideas that were marked "Implemented," although nothing recent.

Removing an Idea post only guarantees it cannot be found.I don't know if staff looks at Ideas these days, but we shouldn't assume they don't.

After thinking about it further, you might want to post your "Load More" issue as a Problem (& mention each page-type where you find it.) After all, IMDb fixed the way the Ratings page displayed (I believe that was a Load More page after the Dec 6 update).

I agree that this thread is messy. I agree that the Fork process created lots of blank space on your post. The sillier Paste worked better for the replies. I just wanted to get it off that other guy's Idea.

I have no clue how to search for the things you found, much less for titles with lots of reviews. Probably the Top 250?

I don't know why you're listing the name, the length of membership, and the user link, when just the .../user/ur.../reviews link suffices. The number of reviews is an excellent annotation.

Sorry but I'm also struggling to understand this thread, do you mind clarifying? If you are querying why ideas posted on GS are not actioned it is generally due to us only having a limited amount of development resource in which to implement any improvements or add new features to the site. This is often a tough decision but we try to implement any improvements for the best of the majority of our users.

From the user reviews page, and Jeorg's bookmarklet, the review for Atomic Blonde ishttps://www.imdb.com/review/rw4191593I don't see a rating on that review, but the date is 5Jun18, and the helpfulness is 1 of 3.

Sorting by review date & search the page for "bob the moo", and it's there.

Sorting by helpfulness (least first) requires several Load More's, but it's there too.

Yes, it is worth noting that you can hover over the "Report this" hyperlink, right-click and then select "Copy Link Location"; and then pick out the part that contains the individual review identifier. I should've mentioned that before. I'm glad you pointed out something to that effect.

Hi Will,This was an attempt by me to move some responses away from another thread that had gone off-topic. I didn't want to just delete them. I see these as a preliminary discussion on how to post a new idea/problem, and both ACT_1 and I felt we'd gone off the topic of the thread where the first 3 posts were created.

I don't think classifying this thread as a Problem is correct. Eventually, a thread might be created about Load More on certain IMDb pages being a problem. That is not this thread, and I wasn't expecting IMDb staff to respond.

As ACT_1 suggested, this is eventually going to get deleted. But without a private messaging system, this is an attempted substitute.

No worries, thanks for letting me know. I've marked this as question answered, that way you guys can continue your conversation without it requiring staff intervention.

I'm sure that something like displaying reviews is an automated dynamic process, so that if a new review is posted (and accepted) it is included immediately. I can certainly vouch for that being the case for Trivia, Soundtracks, and even Cast changes, having submitted some.

I agree that because of that dynamism, page number will not mean the same every time someone visits Reviews for the same title. (Hence the need for a permalink when I want a friend to read review X on IMDb without my having to copy/paste it for them.) But I think page number can still have value. It should still get you to the right neighborhood. But you might miss a review that is newly moved up into the territory you skip.

If I were someone who looked at lots of reviews, Load More would be a problem for me. On a Chromebook, I have limited hardware resources, and I have 12 tabs open at the moment. So more and more reviews on a page will start to fail eventually. That alone means Pages would be better, even if the page number is not an exact future reference point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_Siskelan American film critic and journalist for the Chicago Tribune. Along with colleague Roger Ebert,he hosted a series of popular review shows on television from 1975 to 1999.

Some folks just have to voice their opinionHmmm, like I am doing here

Will shudda got my entire reply in email - no need to read it hereand he gets email for all else we are doing here ? (maybe turned that off !?!)

Bob the Moo kept a list of prolific Reviewers as he wasback when the Boards were activeI saved some of that list