In the news:

UCLA employees voice concerns over reduced disability insurance

Posted:

May 31, 2017

12:33 am

Correction: The original version of the graphic incorrectly stated there was no waiting period for disability insurance in 2016. In fact, the waiting period ranged from seven to 180 days.

This post was updated May 31 at 10:43 a.m.

Some UCLA employees are concerned a decrease in disability insurance could hurt new mothers, who use it as a form of maternity leave.

Emily Taylor, an expecting mother and director of the master of business administration career education and communications at the UCLA Anderson School of Management, said she recently discovered the change in the University of California’s short-term disability insurance.

UC spokesperson Stephanie Beechem said in an email that the UC’s disability insurance in 2017 now only covers 60 percent of an employee’s income for six weeks, compared to 70 percent in 2016. Additionally, the UC instituted a standardized 14-day waiting period, which previously ranged from seven to 180 days depending on insurance plans, for employees before they can receive benefits. During the waiting period, employees can use sick days or vacation days to continue to receive pay.

Beechem added that if employees have accrued more than 14 days of sick leave, they must use up to 22 of their sick days before benefits begin.

Taylor also said she was shocked that UCLA, one of the largest employers in Los Angeles, did not extend benefits comparable to other employers such as USC.

She added she thinks UCLA does not offer enough resources even after a mother returns to work. For example, UCLA’s childcare costs about $2,000 a month for employees.

Masha Taylor, also an expecting mother and operations manager for the Center for Global Management at Anderson, said she thinks UCLA’s benefits are not as great as the university claims.

“It’s unfair that UCLA and the whole UC system always say how great benefits we have, especially for maternity leave,” Masha Taylor said. “It’s not good at all. All my friends that are working in the private sector get paid maternity leave through their companies.”

Taylor added that as a UCLA employee, she is not eligible for state benefits because the UC does not pay into the California State Disability Insurance program, which provides employees up to six weeks of paid leave per year to care for family members.

“Not only do we not get paid maternity leave, we don’t even get the state benefit,” she said.

The UC is not subject to SDI, according to UCLA Human Resources, though new employees can collect the SDI benefit up to 18 months into their job at the UC.

Chelsea Harder, director of the Applied Management Research Program at Anderson and also an expecting mother, said she only found out about the policy when a colleague started asking human resources for more details about the change.

Some of Emily Taylor and Harder’s colleagues who gave birth while working at UCLA took months off without pay, Taylor said. She also said she knew people who had to dip into their savings or pick up side jobs to avoid going into debt.

Harder added she does not like having to use more of her own sick days because she thinks they should be used for emergencies to care for her child.

The UC made the changes to its disability insurance program, including adjusting benefit levels for 2017, to allow more employees to qualify for benefits, to keep disability insurance affordable for all employees and to simplify benefit options, Beechem said.

Masha Taylor said she does not think the UC should make cuts on maternity leave in general.

“I feel like maternity leave is not the place where we should be cutting benefits, especially when the whole state is trying to give more to maternity leave and a lot of companies in California are supportive (of) maternity and paternity leave,” she said.

Why did you only talk to UCLA Anderson employees? These are some of the highest paid employees of all UCLA staff. You can look at this information as it is public.

Also, UC employees accrue so many sick days that do not get capped each year. All of these women (and other employees) who have worked for years on campus, have many days of sick leave. It barely makes a dent to use up some for maternity leave.

The argument about women in corporate America get 6 weeks of paid leave…well, there are many things these women would also like that UC staff receive. Do they have a good work/life balance like UC staff do? No, they work 40+ hours on a regular basis for their salary. Ask any MBA grad who works in Consulting.

Sandra Lazo

I think the author spoke to these three women from Anderson because they decided to speak up about the maternity leave cuts. Maternity leave benefits are important for both men and women, and if there a change it should be increase the benefit and not to cut them. I am very proud they spoke up.

Their salaries and other benefits are not under discussion here. The point is the benefit reduction.

Poll

The University of California Office of the President commissioned a report on how to reduce the office’s costs. UCOP provides resources for UC-wide initiatives such as carbon reduction and cyber security efforts. The report follows pressure from state legislators for the office to cut unnecessary expenses. What do you think about this?
The proposals would eliminate unecessary programs and are a praiseworthy attempt by UCOP to streamine its operations.
The proposals merely transfer funding to UC campuses and are a see-through attempt by UCOP to improve its image in the eyes of the state government.
The proposals are harmful as they would cut out 110 jobs at UCOP and eliminate programs that help students.
I have feelings about this issue that are not expressed in the options above.
Submit View results without voting »