So, let’s get this straight. In 2004, when there was a Republican President named George W. Bush, we had the pleasure of Willard “Mitt” Romney lecturing us about how, obviously, it’s “silly” and “poppycock” to blame the president for the economy. It also made no sense to change horses in midstream, or to fail to look at what caused the economic downturn in the first place, or to ignore slowdowns in Europe and Asia, etc, etc. In other words, the exact OPPOSITE of his entire argument this time around. Oh, and Romney also says the right way to get an economy going is to put money in people’s hands. I believe that’s known as “Keynesian economics.” Finally, Romney says it would be a mistake to raise taxes in a down economy, which is exactly what a new, nonpartisan analysis shows he’d have to do on 95% of Americans if he kept the promises he’s made in this campaign. My god, my head hurts just thinking about this flip flopping, pathologically lying weirdo. Blech.