Meaning Mike is winning both first and second place - unless you count "someone else/undecided" as the second place winner. But, that would have been my answer, too - because no one has earned my vote yet if Mike doesn't run.

More interesting info from the polling results:

Sarah is the top 2nd choice among Huckabee supporters. Mike is the top 2nd choice among Newt (31%), Sarah (42%), Ron Paul (28%), and Mitt (29%) supporters and is tied for 2nd choice with Mitt for Pawlenty supporters.

Bosman,Thank you. I'm not sure how much time I can spend today. Debbie asked me to blog it since she's going to be gone.

I noticed the difference, too. Is anyone familiar with that other polling company? I never heard of them before. From the information they released and their commentary, I figured they must be Romney people. Why else would they have spun it like they did?

"Maybe they're both correct and the Iowa voters are just in a fickle when it comes to who to choose." Haha, that would be a hoot especially if both polling companies polled the same people. Well, it would be nice if we had more polling companies, but here are a few things:

While PPP does have their ups and downs, they appear to have a better record when it comes to Iowa than a few other states (but, that could be luck)

Mr. is Huckabee is leading (the question is how much?)

Finally, it is not uncommon to have so many undecided and quasi undecideds this far away from an election. So while there are trends to be sure, things can and will change a little.