The guys who get upset about this are probably the same ones who will wait for a stall to open up because they can't get a stream going at a urinal with another man standing next to them.

Of all the things to get rattled up about in life, this should be damn near the bottom of the list. But obviously that's not the case for many because today's society just has too darn many "boogiemen" (or boogie women, or boogie persons?) walking around who don't look like them, speak like them, or share the same myopic world view as them.

There's seemingly no better way to rattle a duck hunter's cage than post up a clickbait article about "them".

You need to get the women behind the complaining to get the attention of the higher ups. How? Simple...just go in and pee all over the toilet seat then walk out. It won't be long before the women go on a rampage...problem solved.

"The damage to the country has already been done. It comes in the form of a new generation of people who have been coddled to the point of lethargy. Resulting in a voter who can be easily manipulated with sound bites and shiny objects. They are now about to follow the ring down the rabbit hole."

Lets take a stab with this whole "wanting to protect your family" spin you're trying to put on this:

Jamie Wilson needs to use a public restroom.... which one should she use? Should she be allowed to use the restroom that she identifies with and follow you into the mens room. Or should she use the restroom of the gender she was born with and follow your wife and daughters into the women's room? Which one protects your family the best?

This is your thread...

Click to expand...

Again, read what I wrote. Unisex bathrooms that accommodate one individual. Male identifiers, female identifiers and even toaster identifiers can now all use the bathroom. Where “Jamie Wilson” would go, according to what I wrote, is... to the bathroom.

All this talk of “fair” or “he must be afraid to pee next to someone else!”, yeah, I get it. But when you have Shauna (who used to be Sean) come into the women’s area, take photos of an exposed young lady and then flee the scene to upload said photos before he (sorry, “she”) is arrested - where is the justice for that young lady? Who is going to retrieve the photos that were put on the internet for other degenerates to view of the victim? WHY should I care MORE about where “Shauna” feels comfortable peeing or trying on clothes than for the young woman who was violated?

The answer to that is that I shouldn’t.

I gave an option to fix the problem, that would accommodate everyone. What did you who disagree give other than assumption and an attempt to put words in my mouth and or alternate meaning to what I wrote, or some fictitious hang up I must have?

Live and let live isn’t an option as we know there are men who abuse this new feel-good freedom. You can’t take away from one and give to another and achieve “fair”. So what is your solution(s)? I’ve already given mine, and repeated it. Multiple times.

"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions." -Ronald Regan

"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."

I don't like that man. I must get to know him better.
-Abraham Lincoln

"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions." -Ronald Regan

"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."

I don't like that man. I must get to know him better.
-Abraham Lincoln

If I’m on the commode expelling some miller lite and hot wings, and a female to male transperson comes in, do they just wait and offer moral support in the meantime because they can’t use the urinal?
.

All this talk of “fair” or “he must be afraid to pee next to someone else!”, yeah, I get it. But when you have Shauna (who used to be Sean) come into the women’s area, take photos of an exposed young lady and then flee the scene to upload said photos before he (sorry, “she”) is arrested - where is the justice for that young lady? Who is going to retrieve the photos that were put on the internet for other degenerates to view of the victim? WHY should I care MORE about where “Shauna” feels comfortable peeing or trying on clothes than for the young woman who was violated?

Click to expand...

What's to keep any person from going into that restroom, taking photos and fleeing the scene?

Of all the things to get rattled up about in life, this should be damn near the bottom of the list. But obviously that's not the case for many because today's society just has too darn many "boogiemen" (or boogie women, or boogie persons?) walking around who don't look like them, speak like them, or share the same myopic world view as them.

Click to expand...

I respectfully but firmly disagree with your 'myopic world view' comment. God made mankind male and female. Period. Your birth gender defines you either as male or female, not the other or something in between. It is your view of the world that needs a reality check, my friend. No amount of gender blending will change the facts of life.

Steve

Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.