I’ve always thought 2015 was
going to be a great year for boxing mostly for what happened outside the ring
than in it as Golden Boy owner and boxing legend Oscar De La Hoya made all the
right moves in his quest to get the best fights made inluding thawing the cold war
between Golden Boy and Bob Arum’s Top Rank which opens up the possibility of a number of great fights.

2014 on the whole was a dismal
year for the sweet science as the Al Haymon effect was felt full force as top
talent in the sport under his advisement shamelessly ducked viable opponents,
fought overmatched opponents (Danny Garcia’s shameful non-title bout with thethen unranked Rod Salka the most flagrant example), or dropped belts altogether
for reasons still unclear to many boxing fans across the board.

But probably his most blatant transgression
in 2014 was that he made the sport more predictable with his low risk approach
to matchmaking, a worrying mindset that slowly kills a niche sport like boxing
that thrives on fighters taking risky or difficult fights. Even worse than
that, fighters, most notably those under his advisement, seemed to have
internalized this mindset to the point that they were openly bragging about avoiding stiff competition to the chagrin of boxing fans everywhere.

However in 2015, even Al Haymon
, probably the most risk averse adviser in the history of the sport, seems to
have made a commitment to put his already large and growing stable of fighters
in more competitive fights (though largely with each other) and despite the
largely negative assessments of his influence on boxing offered by members of
fourth estate, he managed to put boxing back on television after a long hiatus
which easily the most encouraging news so far in the world of boxing.

Add to that the impressive PPV
numbers generated by the Wilder v Stiverne and Alvarado v Rios III bouts and
the heavyweight division becoming more competitive with a growing list of contenders and prospects
looking to make 2015 their year’ 2015 is looking like the year boxing comes
back swinging for the fences.

With these developments, 2015
looks to be one of the best years in boxing in ages but what would put 2015
over as one of the best years in the history of sport would be to see the fight
just about everybody wants, the yet to be made super fight between Floyd Mayweather
Jr. and Manny Pacquiao. It stands as a testament to the star power of both men
that sports blogs have donated thousands of articles wildly speculating about
Pacquiao’s and Mayweather’s next fight.

With nothing set in stone and
Showtime and HBO yet to come to an agreement, boxing fans are forced to hold
their breath and hope a deal is struck. However, with both fighters at least on
speaking terms and there being way too much on the table for the networks
prevent the fight from happening, there is grounds to be optimistic that a deal will be done
sooner rather than later.

In sum, 2015 is to be a great
year in boxing and boxing fans after the nightmare of 2014 and maybe the year
that boxing reestablishes itself as the world number one combat sport.

My name is Mike Bratter, I am
fairly new to 3D printing but have an entrepreneurial background. I was a co-founder of an online digital design
firm named CyberSight in the 1990s which was ultimately acquired. In the 2000s I ran a real estate business
that invested in land during the housing boom.
In both cases I luckily managed to get out before things imploded. I see the 3D printing space in the earliest
stages, similar to what the Internet was like in 1994 when the first graphical
browser was released and I want to be part of this industry as it gains
credibility.

My name is Frank Woll and I’ve
been involved in 3D modeling for real world objects since the 1990s. Primarily my work consisted of CAD modeling
large boat hulls to be CNC machined for the yachting industry. There’s nothing like the fear of a full size
150’ “print” of your 3D model starting up.
Any mistakes would be… not good. Since those early times and the advent
of 3D printers and small CNC machines, prototyping right from the desk can be
done to review and test shapes which has had me very excited about the 3D
printing revolution.

What
got you interested in doing a startup?

Mike: I have been
following the 3D printing space for a few years but just as an investor,
watching stocks like 3D Systems and Stratasys and trying to keep tabs on the
industry. This past year I joined a
local 3D printing group where Frank and I met and that led me to seriously
think about how to get involved now that there are many low cost printer
options and interest online is really
starting to percolate.

Frank: As Mike mentioned, we
met at a local 3D printing group and we both happened to have similar interest
and awe at the potential this new development in technology has to offer. I’ve always had more ideas than I can manage
for products and know that there are others out there with the same desire to
create better objects. Without the
barrier to manufacturing of the past, I believe a better living experience
through design needs to be made available.

Can you
explain to our readers what Comakr is and how it works?

Comakr is going to be an online
community where 3D printing makers and 3D designers join forces to crowdsource
digital files for cool and practical real world objects and products.

The format we envision will
work like this:

The best concepts for unseen
products and objects will be discussed and hashed out publicly on the site and
the best ideas will be “upvoted” to the
top of the page, think of how the site reddit works. Once the crowd has democratically vetted out
the favored ideas, a designer will be selected to actually work on the project. This user could be someone who actively participated in the discussion of
the concept or it could be a designer who bids on the project, either way the
crowd will decide by vote who is chosen.

The winning designer names his
or her price to design the 3D file.

The ball is then back in the
community’s court to crowdfund to the designer’s designated fee.

Once the requested design fee
is met the designer will then go off and create the file. The greatest thing we think
about the site is going to be that once the file is released it will be
available to everyone in the Comakr community free of charge. The files from all funded campaigns will be
archived so anyone who uses the site can access a digital file repository and
select which campaigns they want to try out and experiment with at home or with
the fancy office 3D printer.

What
was the spark or inspiration behind Comakr?

Well it’s just an assumption
but we think the more talented designers are holding back from sharing their 3D
designs because there is a glut of free files already online for trinkets and
figurines. We are hoping that if the
designer is adequately financially incentivized to share his or her creative
genius we might see some really wonderful digital blueprints for truly
innovative and useful 3d printed objects shared online.

Who
would you say would be your main competition to your company?

Well our idea is kind of like a
reverse Kickstarter so they could try to stamp us out. We don’t see the dollar amount of what we
raise for each campaign being anywhere near what Kickstarter raises though so I
don’t see a financial reason for them to try and specifically compete with
us. They are more about raising money
for products, like 3d printers, than digital property anyway.

What
obstacles or challenges do you think may get in the way of Comakr being a
success?

The biggest challenge is makers
are used to downloading files for free and there is no shortage of files
available online. We also think the current
3d printing community is still very much a DIY group who likes to figure out
how to design and print their objects on their own.

So far,
people interested in Comakr can sign up to the site, when do you plan to go
live?

Good question. We want to have something working by
February. To be honest we are bootstrap
funding this ourselves so we are debating a secondary concept that may or may
not be part of this site. We can
probably only afford to proceed with one idea right now so we are still trying
to assess which will be more popular and interesting as a first project. Our other idea we are calling printrr.net
for now and it’s essentially a web app that 3D designers can use to sell their
3D designs and objects on their own blog or online shop.

We would be targeting people
who sell customized objects, like eyeglasses, for example which require a user
to finalize their product using a customized interactive design palette. So we would offer a platform that a single
shop owner couldn’t afford to create alone and requires a software developer to
create, but would be a great tool on any 3D designer’s ecommerce site.

The thinking behind this idea
is that huge sites like Shapeways require the designer to have their objects
printed through them. If we allow the
designer to decide who does the printing, like a 3D hub for instance, they
might be able to sell the object for less money to their customers and also
increase their own profit margin since their overhead is so much lower. They can still use the big sites to generate
traffic to their work but they can use our web platform as another way to sell
their 3d objects just like a person who sells products on Amazon usually has
their own company website as well.

What’s
your take on the state of the crowdfunding and 3d printing industry today?

This is Mike speaking and I
think there is still a lot of hype going on which at least is putting 3D printing
on the radar of the average person. I see printers on Kickstarter raising
millions of dollars and who knows if they will ever even be made. I think of the saying “sell the sizzle and
not the steak” when I see what is being promised right now on crowdfunding
sites. I don’t see as much attention
to practical uses for 3D printing but I know that is on the way. The big issue is the printers that make
objects out of cool materials like different metals cost hundreds of thousands
of dollars to own so the rest of us are still being forced to make plastic
cubes.

Where
do you see the both industries going in next five years?

Prices of printers are dropping
without a doubt and that is going to mean more widespread adoption. There are promises of affordable metal
printers in 2015 which would be awesome.
Gartner says there will be over 2 million printers in homes within 3
years and most of these will cost under $2,500. Right now there are under 100,000 printers owned by consumers. Our crowdsourcing idea will really take hold
when the consumer and small business owner steps in. We are probably still a little early but it
will happen.

Where
do you see Comakr in the next five years?

We are starting this out on our
own without any investors and want to grow at our own pace so we will be
focused on what is best for the community that joins us on the journey. We
want to be a really successful online 3D printing community or even an eCommerce marketplace for 3D objects and since this space is still in it’s
infancy it might not mean we are primarily about crowdfunding in the
future. We might become more of an
incubator of ideas or an online laboratory. We want to stay flexible so whatever direction this movement goes we go
can tag along for the ride.

Connect with Mike on Twitter @3dprintingwow and sign up with Comakr here.