A Jewish Lesson in Abramoff’s Misdeeds?

Going back to the story of Purim, we see how the wicked Haman–the first lobbyist?–paid King Achashverosh 10,000 silver talents to get a decree passed to annihilate the Jews.

Since the beginning of government, those in power have taken advantage of the system to enrich themselves and further their own ends, generally at the expense of everyone else. The irony here is that Abramoff claims to be an observant Jew, even as he was bilking Native American tribes out of millions of dollars and flying politicians to Scotland to help clients circumvent labor welfare laws.

Advertisement

Here too, there is nothing new–a claim to be ‘religious’ while ignoring the ethical injunctions that are a crucial part of living a godly life. This is why it says in Pirkei Avot (The Ethics of our Fathers): “If a man profanes things which are sacred, and offends the holidays and puts his fellow to shame publicly… even though he has a knowledge of the Torah and good works, he has no share in the world to come.” (3.19)

If this seems unduly harsh, I should point out that Abramoff stole not only money, but also the public trust. By perpetuating a system of pay-to-play, he helped contribute to and validate the widely held cynicism about government and public service, precisely when this country needs some idealism and hope that government can be a force for good. And by acting this way while claiming to be “religious,” he drags the ideals of all those of good faith into the gutter as well, turning his offense against other people into a chillul ha-shem (an offense against God) as well.

Advertisement

I should be very clear that there’s nothing particularly Jewish about this story–corruption has no religion. A while back, it was Charles Keating and the savings and loan scandal (Keating was a conservative Catholic who spearheaded a prominent anti-pornography campaign under the heading of moral values while paying off senators to avoid regulation and oversight for his banks–hypocrisy, it seems, has no religion either.)

Jack Abramoff was simply a part–albeit an important part–of the culture of corruption that currently reigns in Washington. And until the cushy system that makes it easy for lobbyists and politicians to cozy up to each other out of the public eye is reformed, we will continue to have corruption and hypocrisy, even a those who commit proclaim their ‘religious’ values.

And by acting this way while claiming to be “religious,” he… [turns] his offense against other people into a chillul ha-shem (an offense against God) as well. Well that certainly seems intuitive. However are there any passages to that effect in the Talmud? And could someone perhaps cite one for me? Thanks!

” If a man profanes things which are sacred, and offends the holidays and puts his fellow to shame publicly even though he has a knowledge of the Torah and good works, he has no share in the world to come. (3.19) Isn’t this piece of halacha applicable more so to one’s relations to other Jews not so much to the outside world. While there are plenty of legal rulings that would deem Abramoff’s actions wrong, isn’t there one that would be more encompassing? Or does is this one applicable to all Jews. Just curious about the context in which it was written.

It’s not enough to claim religion, any religion, and it isn’t enough to show up to services or to do the obvious public gestures. In order for someone to be truly religious, he must live a devout life in private also. God see what is in your heart even if you don t.

It’s at this point that I usually ask, How many rules can one break and still be considered “observant”? Is there any evidence that this guy ever did anything? I even heard his restaurant had problems being kosher.

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

The Task Is Never FinishedIt has been heartwarming to read the warm responses to Rabbi Waxman's post asking Beliefnet to reconsider its decision to cancel Virtual Talmud. Virtual Talmud offered an alternative model for internet communications: civil discourse pursued in ...

Some Parting ReflectionsWell, loyal readers, all good things must come to an end and we’ve been informed that this particular experiment in blogging as a forum for creating wide-ranging discussion on topics of interest to contemporary Jews has run its course. Maybe ...

Obama's Lesson and The Jewish CommunityThere are few times in this blog’s history when I have felt that Rabbi Grossman was one hundred percent correct in her criticisms of my ideas. However, a few weeks ago she called me out for citing a few crack websites on Barak Obama’s ...

The Future of Race RelationsAs a post-baby boomer, it is interesting to me to see how much of today’s conversation about racial relations is still rooted in the 1960s experience and rhetoric of the civil rights struggle, and the disenchantment that followed. Many in the ...

Wright and Wrong of Race and JewsYears ago, as a rabbinical student, I was one of a group of rabbinical students who visited an African American seminary in Atlanta. My fellow rabbinical students and I expected an uplifting weekend of interfaith sharing like we had experienced ...