Facts from Israel.
News, strategic reports, assessments, opinion, facts, information.
All you need to understand and report on Israel in a wider world.

Monday, 14 August 2017

North Korea and Iran. The Nuclear Results of Strategic Patience.

While American politics in melt down mode over the Democrats
almost yearlong obsession in trying to find a scintilla of evidence with which
they can hang Trump on charges of colluding with the Russians, both North Korea
and Iran have been busy getting on with developing their nuclear missile
programs.

Having been distracted, America now faces a nuclear crisis, not with Russia but with North Korea, and potentially with Iran further down the road.

North Korean President Kim Jong-un has blatantly carried out
a series of missile tests that show their capability of launching a nuclear
missile strike that will put the west coast of the United States within range.

When President Trump warned North Korea of the “fire and
fury, never seen before” should they test America’s patience, some
Democrats and Obama hang-overs, such as Ben Rhodes, the White House Deputy
National Security Secretary under President Obama, accused Trump on MSNBC of “extreme
and false statements about all manner of things. It’s more concerning,” he
said, “when they are about nuclear weapons.”

So who gets it? Ben Rhodes, or President Trump? Rhodes introduced a security policy of “strategic
patience.” Rhodes, it should be remembered, was an ardent promoter of
Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran which rewarded the Islamic Republic to the tune
of $150 Billion while allowing them to continue their intercontinental
ballistic missile development program.

Compare Rhodes criticism to Trump’s statement to Donald
Trump’s comments about making nuclear deals with regimes like North Korea on an
NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ TV interview in October 1999. That was a decade
and a half before Donald Trump entered politics. Here is what he said about the
Administration’s refusal, or inability, to adequately close down North Korea’s
nuclear program, “Do you want to do it in five years when they have warheads
all over the place, each one of them pointing at New York and Washington, is
that when you want to do it, or do you want to do it now?”

In that interview, Trump talking about the US negotiators, and
using his familiar verbal style, added that the North Korean leaders “are
laughing at us. They think we’re a bunch of dummies.”

Who can say, faced with today’s crisis, that Trump was
wrong?

The most recent North Korean testing has seen them use their
missile launch capability for carrying miniaturized nuclear weapons which they
announced would be placed on their warships to aim at Guam. This is not new
technology or intelligence. Revelations show that the US Military Intelligence reported
this technology to the Obama Administration back on April 2013, but, operating
on Ben Rhodes’s “strategic patience” paradigm, President Obama decided
to deny the contents of this intelligence assessment, and do nothing about it.
In other words, they covered up the intelligence as being politically
inconvenient. Strategic patience bathed in denial has resulted in North Korea
arriving at this dangerous moment for the United States and the Trump
Administration.

It is worth reminding ourselves that Wendy Sherman was one
of the architects of both the North Korean and the Iranian nuclear deals. The
North Korean deal was used as the US template for the negotiations with Tehran
over their advanced nuclear program.

Both were based on the fallacy of a strategic patience policy of “let’s go easy on them and see what happens in ten years’ time.”

How did the US Intelligence and the Obama Administration
allow this dramatic national security failure to occur? This should be required
study for leading Strategic and National Security think tanks.

The strategic patience policy is a frightening failure. It
is nothing more than politically kicking the can down the road to be picked up
by a future Administration when it is about to explode in a mushroom cloud.

America is in crisis mode right now. They are scrambling to
come up with a solution to the North Korean nuclear threat, but there appears
to be no good solution in sight, particularly when you are dealing with
unpredictable rogue regimes. Conflict seems inevitable.

This is the consequence of kicking that can down the
road. Tomorrow, they will wake up to the
same crisis when Iran takes the wraps off their project and are ready for a
nuclear breakout.

Barry Shaw is the Senior Associate for Public Diplomacy
at the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies.

1 comment:

I always had a thing for the military. I am always curious about them. There is a new online website who has started to give those information and other things like the location of military bases in the us.