Just understand what the translator shows, but I think the photo with him riding the alpine foil is as real with the mono mounted (just check foot position) as these are his groupies

But sounds he knows what he is doing, so hope he stays tuned to it and will be successful.

@fun2kite:
IMHO don't even expect the scubajet is powerful enough, maybe to keep riding with minimum speed on a good foil if you're light but not more. But a propulsion and also the tube around wont replace a stabi from its effect. Even worse a bad controlled propulsion will make foiling even more difficult than a kite in gusty conditions. A kite has a great stabilizing effect. Just to take both hands of the bar on a monofoil is not easy, just check in my video how fast I take the hands back. And I am sure I wouldn't be able to use a monofoil without kite, it would be like coasting (foot of) on a extra high unicycle, never seen.

Hmmm interesting, it will have more vortex drag and tip stall easy, but if the tips has higher aoi (and it overall has higher AR as otherwise the vortex will counteract the higher aoi), it would stabilize the wing just like a swept wing with washout (less aoi at the tips) is stable.

OR, one could use an "S" profile with positive pitching moment, on a more straight wing (a stable wing, no need for a stabilizer).

Hmmm interesting, it will have more vortex drag and tip stall easy, but if the tips has higher aoi (and it overall has higher AR as otherwise the vortex will counteract the higher aoi), it would stabilize the wing just like a swept wing with washout (less aoi at the tips) is stable.

OR, one could use an "S" profile with positive pitching moment, on a more straight wing (a stable wing, no need for a stabilizer).

There ARE some different known options indeed

PF

When the speed increases, there would be greater lift, causing twist which should increase the angle of attack of the tips, generating even more lift?

Isn't yaw stability the main concern?
It seems like a balance between mast and tip vortices would influence the center the monofoil rotates around in yaw.

Wouldn't a straighter wing shorten the longitudinal distance between these and make yaw control harder?

Wouldn't a forward swept wing have a problem with the yaw center moving abruptly when the upper tip breaches the surface?

It seems like the aft swept example pictured is a more practical platform.

The use of "S" or reflex profile seems viable. The picture of the swept foil seems to suggest there is no reflex at the tips, though, rather a washout or maybe an aft-shifted maximum thickness. Intuitively it would seem the place for reflex would be near the strut, where the chord affords plenty of area and the reflex might help mitigate turbulence around the strut to wing joint (although this area on the pictured foil doesn't appear to be so refined).

The last time I went back on the mono and had some great sessions. Once I managed to enter a tiny bay, with very difficult low wind conditions. So also here there are no limits for the mono.
But much more important after too much waiting time I was able to ride the new Cruizer wing.

First the best of the day:
A friend with 100 kg tried it in the shown combination with the very difficult 94 x 38 cm board. (I have straps on the board to make it easier to find the right side to put the feet, as with the cruizer, which is nearly as big as the board, it could easily be inverted.

After not even 5 minutes he managed to go nearly 100 m stable flight And he said he wants more ... So now we are 3 Monofoiler on this planet:

About the Wing first the disadvantages:
I was hoping the Cruizer would be better in all categories. It is better in general maybe also a lot but not in all categories compared to the smaller Element wing:
- the Cruizer does have a lot less this gentle surfacing as the element has. If you surface to fast some time you crash, not as often as with a normal foil but closer. (Therefore have to stay with a normal strut length)
- has taken a view minutes to get used to, the pressure created feels more violent when getting out of control
= the Cruizer does not feel much more pich stable, on the other hand speed log shows another truth for higher speeds, so at least it has to be bit better.

Improvements
After getting used to, manoeuvres felt a lot better, think especially due to possible lower riding speed when needed. Normaly the micro pocket board is much harder to jibe even if it has the same weight as my other bigger board but on the pocket you miss moment of inertia, when you change feet position. On the end of the day I was better with the micro pocket than I have ever been on the big board:
- Jibes with feet change worked nearly always on the better side
- putting back feet in the strap during flight worked most time
- and finally did 3 full flying tacks on one side, ... on the end had the feeling flying tacks are easier as you have to change less technic compared to flying jibes.

Unfortunately the wind drops when I wanted to do a video from the manoeuvres. Oh and the back flips are just great, easily to do them agressivly with the foil far above the head out of slow riding speed and to land them always on the wing without touching.

And most important improvement:
Didn't expect have being so "fast" (for a mono) but seem once I passed easily the 30 km/h pretty sure I can even make 35 km/h with better stronger and therefore more stabilizing wind condition. And on the other side the same think I can reach a minimum speed of close to 15 km/h. So we have the big speed window I was always searching for to make the mono 100% perfect for all needs. (apart racing for sure)

So I think I will keep the Cruizer but maybe also the Element. But if you just have the Element, no problem it is not much more difficult, just the minimum speed is higher and therefore you will need a bigger board which is always better.