Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Israel,CNN,Obamacare,SERCO,NSA Spying:What Did CNN and Obama know and when...

CNN,Obamacare,NSA Spying:What Did CNN and Obama know and when...

CNN still hasn't reported on the evil UK corporation SERCO and Obama's gift of billions of dollars to therm to run Obamacare even though their real expertise is prisons !And when has CNN or Iraeli prostitute Wolf Blitzer or Anderson Cooper or phoney Iranian -Zionist CIA NSA prostitute Christiane Amanpour ever report the role of Israeli spys at the U.S.NSA ?

........................
SERCO,although being investigated in the UK for fraud in relation to prisoner ankle bracelet overcharges and being a major contractor at the Navy Yard at time employee Aaaron Alexis began his alleged mass shooting and being suspect of being in and around the Sandy Hook Newtown alleged shooting by Adam son of affluent GE Capital exec Peter Lanza SERCO a foreign entity more at the beck and call of the Rothschild and Zionist controlled City of London than to the American taxpayer and Obamacare recipient or victim they have no right nor reason to even apply for Obamacare funds much less be given such contracts without even a fair bidding process.Barack Obama is as criminanlly negligent as this foreign entity he dares put in control of American medical bureaucracy.SERCO and its CEO even turned up 'coincidentally' at the WTC on 9/11.

1 day ago - ... Hall of Shame · ← Obama Obamacare government health care websitenot working, Despots always blame people not systems, Government (especially crony capitalism) is not the best means to do anything well ...

Did the Obama administration know Healthcare.gov would fail?

Brendan Bordelon 10/19/2013

The British multinational in charge of processing Obamacare paper applications received a hefty contract boost just days before Healthcare.gov’s disastrous roll-out, a sign that the Obama administration may have expected serious problems with the website.

The Business of Federal Technology (FCW) reports that on Sept. 26, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) increased their planned payout to Serco’s U.S. subsidiary by 75 percent, adding an extra $87 million to the $114 million promised for processing initial Obamacare enrollment applications.

The contract documents do not explain the last-minute infusion of federal dollars, and neither Serco nor CMS would disclose why the agreement was modified so soon before the rollout..........

Oct 20, 2009 - ... Delivery/ Indirect Rate/ Identification/IQIndefinite Quantity will mainly be executed at the Washington Navy Yard. Harry Gatanas, Senior Vice President of the Defense and Intelligence Group at Serco Inc. commented “We are honored to be chosen to support the Navy under this contract. ...Serco's award is worth $70 million over a five-year period, one-year base and four one-year option periods. Work on the ID/IQ will mainly be executed at the Washington Navy Yard.

It wasn’t the US government breaking into the private communications of former
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, according to top secret documents unearthed
by Edward Snowden and published in Le Monde – it
was the Israelis.
A four-page internal précis regarding a visit to Washington by two top
French intelligence officials denies the NSA or any US intelligence agency was
behind the May 2012 attempted break-in – which sought to implant a monitoring
device inside the Elysee Palace’s communications system – but instead fingers
the Israelis, albeit indirectly:
The visit by Barnard Barbier, head of the DGSE’s technical division, and Patrick
Pailloux, a top official with France’s National Information Systems Security,
was intended to elicit an explanation for the break-in, which the French media
blamed on the Americans. The NSA’s inquiries to the British, Canadians, Australians,
New Zealanders, and other US allies all turned up negative. However, one such
close ally wasn’t asked.
As Glenn Greenwald and Jacques Follorou, citing the NSA document, put it in
their Le Monde piece: the NSA "’intentionally did not ask either
the Mossad or the ISNU (the technical administration of the Israeli services) whether
they were involved’ in this espionage operation against the head of the French
government."
An interesting omission, to say the least, one justified by the author of the
memo with some odd phraseology: "France is not an approved target for joint
discussion by Israel and the United States." Meaning – exactly what? This
is a job for Marcy Wheeler! But I’ll hazard a guess: the US is well aware of
Israeli spying on France and wants nothing to do with it, and/or the author
of the memo is simply invoking some obscure protocol in order to justify going
any farther.
In any case, the Israeli connection to the NSA’s global spying network – including
its all-pervasive surveillance inside the US – has been well-established by
Greenwald’s previous reporting on the subject: a September 11 article
detailing how the NSA shares raw intercepts from its data-dragnet with Israeli
intelligence, scooping up purloined emails and other data – in effect giving
the Mossad a "back door" into a treasure trove of information on the
private lives and activities of American citizens.The Guardian published a five-page memorandum of understanding between
Tel Aviv and Washington, provided to Greenwald by Snowden: rife with references
to the legal and constitutional constraints "pertaining to the protection
of US persons," it goes on to state forthrightly that the Israelis are
permitted access to "raw Sigint" – unredacted and unreviewed transcripts,
Internet metadata, and the content of emails and telephonic communications.
While the Israelis supposedly solemnly swear to not "deliberately"
target any American citizen, the agreement explicitly rules out a legal obligation
on the part of the Israelis to follow the rules:"This agreement is not intended to create any legally enforceable
rights and shall not be construed to be either an international agreement or
a legally binding instrument according to international law."
The Israelis are allowed to retain raw NSA data on American citizens for up
to a year, as long as they inform the NSA, but when it comes to US government
communications – those must be destroyed "upon recognition." This
interdict presumably covers the internal communications of our law enforcement
officers, but as both James
Bamford and Fox News’s Carl
Cameron have reported, Israeli penetration of this vital sector is already
an accomplished fact.
In his book, The Shadow Factory, and a 2012 Wiredpiece,
Bamford details the NSA’s connections to "secretive contractors with questionable
histories and little oversight" which were used "to do the actual
bugging of the entire U.S. telecommunications network."
According to Bamford, who cites a former Verizon employee, Verint/Comverse
Technology – a company with direct ties to the Israeli government and founded
by former Israeli intelligence officers – "taps the communication lines
at Verizon." Over at AT&T, "wiretapping rooms are powered
by software and hardware from Narus, now owned by Boeing, a discovery made
by AT&T
whistleblower Mark Klein in 2004." As Bamford puts it: "What is especially troubling is that both companies have had extensive
ties to Israel, as well as links to that country’s intelligence service, a country
with a long and aggressive history of spying on the US.
In short, much of the surveillance technology in use by the NSA originated
in Israel, and was developed by Israeli companies with ties – direct subsidies,
board memberships, etc. – to the Israeli government, and specifically its intelligence
services. This would make is easy for the Israelis to construct a “back door”
that would give them access to the system. For one early example, the eavesdropping
software that allows US law enforcement to wiretap reportedly has just such
a "back door," as reported
by Fox’s Carl Cameron, one that has enabled Israeli Mafia and others to shield
themselves from surveillance. The problem became so bad that, in October 2001
a group of law enforcement officials sent a letter to then Attorney General
John Ashcroft warning that the system had been compromised. Cameron reports
that the suspects in the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks may have taken advantage
of the system’s vulnerabilities: "On a number of cases," says Cameron,
"suspects that they had sought to wiretap and survey immediately changed
their telecommunications processes. They started acting much differently as
soon as those supposedly secret wiretaps went into place."
The agreement between the NSA and the Israelis, then, merely made official
what was already operationally true: the Israelis can directly tap into the
NSA’s data dragnet, and indeed have been doing so for years. And it looks like
Snowden wasn’t the only ex-employee to reveal the NSA’s secrets: according to
Bill Binney, a former NSA official cited by Bamford, a "mid level"
NSA official "who was a very strong supporter of Israel" turned over
the NSA’s "advanced analytical and data mining software" to the Israelis.
The big difference, however, is that Snowden didn’t hand it over to a foreign
country – he handed it over to us.
In the case of the attempt to penetrate the communications system of the French
President, what’s interesting is that Washington said nothing in public about
its strong suspicions the Israelis were behind it, even as anti-American sentiment
over the incident reached a fever pitch in Paris. US officials were and are
willing to sit silently while their country is excoriated, letting Uncle Sam
take the heat for our "allies" in Tel Aviv.
Not only that, but the unbalanced relationship between the US and Israel when
it comes to intelligence sharing is openly acknowledged by NSA officials in
top secret documents unearthed by Snowden and reported by the Greenwald-Poitras-Guardian
team: "On the one hand, the Israelis are extraordinarily good Sigint partners
for us, but on the other, they target us to learn our positions on Middle East
problems. A NIE [National Intelligence Estimate] ranked them as the third most
aggressive intelligence service against the US.”
Both Bamford and Cameron have reported that it is "career suicide"
for anyone inside the US government to question the one-sided "special
relationship" between Israel and the US when it comes to intelligence gathering.
The reason for this is the political power of the Israel lobby, and its ability
to target and destroy opposition within the national security bureaucracy. No
doubt their unlimited access to our communications has much to do with this:
I wonder how many dark secrets they have on our politicians? Anyone who thinks
the Israelis would hesitate to use this information, handed over to them so
eagerly by the supine US authorities, is being willfully blind.
This is one aspect of the NSA scandal we are hearing very little about, yet
the Israel connection may be key to seeing the big picture. So let’s step back,
then, and look at the portrait of the Panopticon as painted by the Snowden documents,
and reported on by Greenwald and others.
The US has constructed this global system of interception, which monitors,
records, and stores virtually all electronic and telephonic communications.
It’s an elaborate apparatus, requiring tremendous resources and complex systems
that sort, file, and organize this vast databank so as to make it readily available
to an analyst sitting in his cubicle at an NSA facility. Sitting in the center
of this vast spiderweb, with access to all its manifold threads and extensions,
is not only the US government, but, standing behind them, the Israelis – who
are spying on us, as well.
The Israel lobby and its amen corner continually carp about how any attempt
to negotiate with Iran – or any of their other perceived enemies – is "appeasement."
Yet the real appeasers are those in our government who allow Israel to walk
all over us, in public and in private – even to the extent of handing them the
keys to our entire communications system. I wonder if any of the politicians,
both Democrats and Republicans, who are now making noises about the NSA’s surveillance
have the courage to buck the Israel lobby and bring up this matter in a public
forum. Where is the congressional investigation into this serious breach of
US national security? Where are the hearings?
I’m not holding my breath on this one, and neither should you. But let’s just
put it out there, for the public record.NOTES IN THE MARGIN
You can check out my Twitter feed by going here.
But please note that my tweets are sometimes deliberately provocative, often
made in jest, and largely consist of me thinking out loud.
I’ve written a couple of books, which you might want to peruse. Here
is the link for buying the second edition of my 1993 book, Reclaiming
the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement, with
an Introduction by Prof. George
W. Carey, a Foreword
by Patrick J. Buchanan, and critical essays by Scott
Richert and David
Gordon (ISI
Books, 2008).