Day: November 1, 2012

I’ve been on the road quite a bit this month. Specifically, from Oct. 16-18, 24-28, and 29-31. So I hope you’ll forgive the lack of posting. I did warn you 🙂 Normally, blogging while I’m away isn’t a huge problem, but recently, I’ve been travelling so much that I’m plain exhausted.

I think the cold I caught Thanksgiving Day (here in Canada) is finally going away, but the fact that I got sick at all (first virus in two years) tells me that I’m overdoing it.

So here is the first of two catch-up posts for the month of October. Tomorrow, I’ll blog on various things that have been happening on the learning mutt side of my life.

I signed up for this in September, having missed the course earlier in the year. Knowing what a busy few months I’d have ahead of me, I probably should have waited until the next one, but it doesn’t look like things will get much better at work, so ultimately, there was no time like the present … then.

Dan Blank’s course was enlightening with respect to narrowing focus, targeting our ideal audience, and making use of tools like Google Analytics. The weekly insider calls were productive and encouraged community building within the course. Unfortunately, these and the specialist calls took place during the day and I couldn’t take part in most of them.

I can’t really give much more away without starting to discus the materials in depth and those belong to Dan. Suffice it to say that while I wasn’t able to participate in October as much as I wanted to, I have the course materials on hand and will make use of them often in the months to come.

Having said that, I think the course is best suited to those with some technical savvy but just getting going, and who also have a product to promote (novel, non-fiction, poetry collection, etc.). The participants who had no background in social media or blogging whatsoever tended to have greater difficulty, and those like myself, who do not have a recently published work to promote couldn’t necessarily narrow down our focus sufficiently to make the most of Dan’s lessons.

For the former group, I might recommend Dan’s Social Media 101 and Blogging 101 courses offered through Writer’s Digest University. Links to these can also be found on the We Grow Media site (linked above).

I intended to get some submissions done over the course of October anyway, so I thought I’d join in the fun of Khara House’s October submit-o-rama.

The challenges varied from three submissions per week, through to a submission every day of the month, to the alpha-challenge in which you’d do the same but submit to magazines, contests, and journals in alphabetical order. There was also a name game challenge to submit to publishers according to the letters of your name, and a create your own challenge.

I chose the last and settled on one submission a week. I cheaped out, I know, but I honestly couldn’t manage more. Anticipating the travelling I’d have to do in the latter half of the month, I submitted twice in the first two weeks and then decided I’d try, but not kill myself, for the remainder of the month. That way, I met my challenge and didn’t overwhelm myself further.

I’ve received one rejection so far and the remaining ones are still up in the air. Fortunately, my rejection included a request for other material, so I’m looking at it as a positive.

Khara had forums up on her site: Our Lost Jungle (linked above) as well as an event page on Facebook. There were a handful of dedicated but insane writers (my opinion only) who managed 31 submissions in the month through various challenges. Kudos to them! They worked so hard and I’m sure they’ll be reaping the rewards for some time to come.

Now most of them are onto the November challenges of NaNoWriMo (national novel writers month) and PAD (poem a day). I wish them the best and am sure that they will do smashingly! And of course, our dear Khara deserves praise for putting everything together and giving everyone the kick in the pants they needed to get their work out there!

I wanted to attend this conference last year, but ended up not being able to due to work commitments. So when the conference Web site announced that applications were being accepted, I jumped on board.

NYCtN is an Algonkian pitch conference and writers first have to apply, submitting a short synopsis and writing sample before they are accepted and able to register. When I made it through that stage, I immediately registered and booked my hotel room.

Then came the 88-page guide and half a dozen emails with accompanying assignments. My work was set out for me.

Now I have to make something clear. My goal in going the conference was just to find out what the heck a pitch conference was, how it worked. I’m an experiential learner and sometimes reading about something just doesn’t cut it. So again, to be clear: I had no expectations. I fully expected to have every agent and editor in the place reject me out of hand.

And I went prepared for that outcome. This is not to say that I wrote anything but the best pitch I was capable of or that I blew off any of the assignments. I’m a keener. That would be impossible. I just wasn’t pinning my hopes or self worth on the result of the conference.

Until it started.

Once the first pitch panel took place, which I, keener that I am, volunteered for, I was caught up in the hype. I forgot about my humble goal and suddenly, I felt the pressure to sell. It didn’t help that I was told in no uncertain terms that my novel was dead in the water and that traditional fantasy of any variety wouldn’t sell to anyone.

Nor was it particularly useful that I was advised to either throw out my created world and place the story in a historical setting (not my novel), or failing that, that I should set aside Initiate of Stone and focus on a more commercial project until my money-making capacity could be well-established and that I could then bring out the snoozer and rely on my reputation to coast me through what would surely be a slump in my writing career.

Please note: this was my interpretation of the advice, not the actual advice given. You’ll understand if I wasn’t particularly clear-headed about it.

I lived in that illusory and completely self-induced angst for two days until, thanks to a friend, I remembered why I came to the pitch conference in the first place.

I revised my pitch but did not alter my project and I was true to my original intention and to IoS. I pitched it and received some positive response. Then I had to disappoint (seriously, the worst thing I can do to anyone in my book and pure torture for me) the person who had done everything in his power to guide me in the direction of success.

Here’s what I learned:

A pitch conference is all about the commercial viability of the pitch and its ability to obtain the interest of an agent or editor. You have to back your pitch up of course, but the only thing that anyone will hear at the conference is your pitch. For all intents and purposes, your novel might as well not exist.

It’s best not to bring only one idea/pitch, and if for one reason or another you only have one, you can’t be invested in it. If you are, then a pitch conference may not be your best bet. There are often opportunities to have your pitch critiqued before the pitch session opens. If one idea doesn’t pass muster, keep pulling them out and throwing them against the wall until something sticks.

It’s common to pitch an idea for a novel that you haven’t written yet. So long as you have the time and dedication to bang it out, this is acceptable, even expected. I might go so far as to suggest that it’s a good idea to have your novel ideas plotted out and maybe even a few key scenes written, but that you may need to be flexible enough to accept suggestions that will drastically alter your novel. This is harder to do with a project that you’ve invested months or years in writing.

If you’re like me, and reading these pieces of advice isn’t really enough, if you have to experience a pitch conference for yourself and you only have one project, one you’ve invested time in and are attached to, then stay true to your intent and be prepared to hear some things that you won’t want to accept. Keep in mind that these things are going to be said to you with the best of intentions: to make you a viable career author. If you’re not ready for that, so long as you understand that and keep all the excellent advice you receive in mind, you’ll be fine.

One way or the other, you and your work will emerge stronger on the other side.

Algonkian conferences have helped many writers achieve success. Just visit their site and read the testimonials. It’s a great opportunity that if you’re ready for, you shouldn’t pass up.

Besides, you usually get excellent advice outside the pitch panels and sessions as well. In this case, Barbara Kyle delivered several sessions on plot and structure and Amy and Duncan McKenzie delivered an informative and entertaining session on improvisational techniques.

I even got some sight-seeing in 🙂

I highly recommend attending an Algonkian conference, or any pitch conference, and found it had the potential to be profoundly life-changing.