Hey /pol/, I made a new word that we can use to challenge the propagators of white geniocide. The word is "Reticide", and it is our counterpart to the Jewish term, "Genocide", but more accurately depicted in order to illustrate the position of whites.

>Why should we used this word?

If we meme this word into casual conversation, then we create for ourselves a new vector, a new ARENA, through which we can accuse people of committing reticide.

>Why do we need to make more words?

If we make more words and develop a more robust white identiterian lexicon, we will force people to learn our meanings, and we will gain ground in social consciousness.

Please, spread this word. Post it everywhere. Make your own words. ACCUSE PEOPLE OF RETICIDE!

you could've at least taken off the red squiggly lines to make this sharable, very bad optics. also "encouraging the group not to reproduce or to mix races with other groups" has to be changed. it's grammatically incorrect and makes it sounds like the propaganda is anti-miscegenation. also the latin word for silence isn't "reti" (???); it's "silentium" or "taciturnitās"

It's not a bad idea, I like the latin source (killing by silencing) but there's better alternatives. Something akin to "erasing" rather than silencing would work better.

But like this anon >>12668099 said (in an overly hostile way, though) what you're thinking is playing the same game (((they))) play.

Remember the "Let's call Zionists Jew-Supremacists!" idea?

Didn't work so well. And you should take a moment or two to reflect on that.

The problem isn't the words we use, nor the expression of said words. Language DOES shape how people think and has an impact on how we see the world, but the reverse is also true.

This sort of tactic attempts to alter language in an attempt to alter public perception but is hindered by the fact that public perception also alters the language we use.

Which makes this sort of thing exceedingly difficult since (((they))) have a mass warping effect on public perception.

For instance: when we say "Greatest Ally", both we and the public think of Israel. The difference being that, for the public, it's not ironic. The perception the average people have of Israel is that it's a small oppressed country where Islamic missiles rain everyday and they have to commit war-crimes every now and then to defend themselves. They are also our best allies in the region and somehow help the US a lot. Somehow.

What you are trying to do is fight this notion on a very indirect way.

For now at least, our interests would be better served by altering the public perception of Israel. Language will accompany this, in time. New words/expressions will sprout when it does, and that's the signal you're waiting to let you know we've reached a point where Jews are persona non-grata in the West.

Except no, paid jewish shill. We already have a word for what you're trying to redefine. The word is genocide. It is white genocide. It is the genocide of white people. You don't get to redefine this ETHNIC GENOCIDE.

Calling it white genocide is good, but when people think "Genocide", they think pogroms and people's doors being kicked in, rounded up, etc, so people use that as a basis to say white genocide isn't real. Reticide is much more difficult to deny, and for that reason, I call you a shill.

>you're a shill because I am too stupid to know the definition of the word genocide and too lazy to educate people on what genocide really means

That's your problem, not mine. Well, it's partially mine because I'm not done with my book yet, but I'm close. Still, there's nothing stopping you from teaching people what genocide REALLY is right now.

I think you ought to change the word, tbh. "Reticentia" isn't "silence" in the sense of a lack of sound, it's silence insofar as one chooses not to talk. It refers to retaining from talking for whatever reason. But it's an act of will on the part of the speaker, not something forced on somebody else. Reticence is usually viewed as virtuous, since wise people often don't chatter pointlessly. If someone had their mouth bonded so that they couldn't speak, that's not "reticentia"; that's just being forced to be quiet. When a wise man purposely avoids gossips, that's "reticentia." Also, it's just weird to say that "reti-" means "restrained silence." That's like saying that "gobi-", meaning "government" in Spanish, when the word is "gobierno." Maybe say, "reti- comes from 'reticentia' which means 'keeping silent.'"

Not trying to be a dick (I'm just a Latinfag after all), just trying to be constructive. The idea is good. There should be a word for this.

Try formulating it like fratricide etymology is formulated: "Fratricide (from the Latin words frater "brother" and cida "killer," or cidum "a killing," both from caedere "to kill, to cut down")." That's from Wikipedia, but I think it's a pretty solid etymology (make sure to follow the bit about "cida" and "cidum" since "-cide" doesn't mean shit in Latin)

You swarthy med bastard haha I think that "silenticide" might be the best word but it sounds kind of funny, tbh. "Tacicide" is also funny. The word in general is funny because "matricide" is the killing of one's mother, fratricide, the killing of one's brother, regicide, the killing of one's king. "reticide", "silenticide" etc. would therefore have to mean "the killing of silence." It cannot mean on the level of morphology, "killing BY/THROUGH silence." So I don't know.

make sure to read the second part of this >>12668174, and what I said to the other anon about how this doesn't make sense etymologically; "reticide", "silenticide" would mean etymologically "the killing of silence", just like matricide means the killing of one's mother and genocide means the killing of some stock of people. Consequently "delencide" would meaning the "the killing of erasure/erasing" (this is all nonsensical)

this is just ugly and bad word generation. it has to make sense etymologically. After all, what we are talking about is really just "genocide" but done in a hushed down way. There is already a word for it, but it isn't qualified by the methods. That's what adjectives are for. So really it's just a "silent genocide", or better, a hidden genocide.

There's several expressions english speakers use that are straight up french, like "Fiancee" or "Faux pas"

A silent killing rougly translates as "massacre silencieux". Not too keen on the "silencieux" part, but something about the word "massacre" sounds great for this: it's the same in english, and bridges the concept to english speakers.

I'm not sure if this is helpful by if I were to translation "killing (by means of) silence", I'd say "interfectiō silentiō" or "occīsiō/occīdio silentiō" (the word "genocide" didn't exist in Latin in any form and was invented by a Jew)

I think you should aim more for a word to make sense. That's what the Jews did what they invented the word "genocide", "the killing of a stock." Just take their word and qualify it, "The Silent Genocide", "Genocide in Silence."

What about "stirpicide"? It would mean "killing of the race" or "killing of the stock." It doesn't talk about how they're killed, but it's an alternative to "genocide" that wasn't invented by a Jew and was invented by me, a handsome med that hates the ZOG

"patriacide" is etymologically perfect, "death of the fatherland", but sounds a little strange, idk how first declension feminine nouns typically change when "-cida" was added to them, I haven't seen an example yet in the Latin

"patriacide" can work too, I guess. I finally found a similar example. The Romans never would've made a word like this, BUT in English, there is at least this precedent hahaha maybe there are other examples

I don't necessarily agree. I also think it would be good to come up with words, contrary to racism, sexism, and all the isms, that we can throw at the opposing side, which have no real counters other than accepting them, or trying to deny them. Either end is a losing end when talking to the average person. When we use their language we fail miserably because from the ground up the entire foundation for these terms and ideals are weaponized to undermine our positions. So if we call a beaner who advocates "la raza" in our country racist, we're laughed at. "Only white people can be racist." The control of language has a lot of white people frozen in the headlights.

Im not American, so the situation for you is very different from mine, but if you're met with labels like racist,sexist etc i find that the most effective strategy against it is ridicule and dismissal, simply refuse to play on their battleground, and if they keep firing those labels at you, simply retreat and don't interact with them, it's really not worth it to engage with raging brainwashed communists tbh, only do so if it's 1on1 and you dont have spectators to fire up their virtue-glands. If they don't listen to reason, simply ridicule them any way you can.

This idea is incredible but we have to use this as a satirical LARP retending to be leftists. Otherwise we will look like the whiney SJWs that lost traction from crying about #BlackLivesMatter. We have to say, brown people are in danger of reticide by means LARPing as disgusting SJWs that couldnt be seriously considered

Okay, after considering everyone's input I came up with this. I'd like to ask that anyone making edits use this one, as it does away with the error squiggles, has the proper etymological roots, and seems concise enough digest without being too inflammatory. We can keep tweaking it if you want, but I think it's important to at least use a version that doesn't have error markings.

Latin albus, a, um means white, purity, etc. It is a particularly ancient Proto-Indoeuropean root that is reference to mountains, which as you will know Caucasians are named after mountains. Further, Albion is the mythical name of the British isles (probably after their white cliffs) and deeply connected to English mythology. In the popular imagination Albion reminds them of King Arthur and other knightly purity once trained on it, and Albacide is the killing of that. Would need education since people don't know about Albion, but it's a pretty word.

Quies, quietes - quiet, repose, death

It's the sort of quiet that death brings. It's pronounced "Kwee-eh-tis". If you wanted to describe this sort of silent death creeping in, that's the Latin for it. It's a Quieting, which already has a meaning to English audiences. Imagine smothering a human face with a pillow and shushing them as they silently struggle until they are finally, horrifyingly still and silent. That's Quieting. Also doubles for the free speech thing since they are intrinsically linked.

Sicarii - Assassins

Literally Jewish zealot assassins that the Romans had to deal with in Palestine. They still exist actually. Problem is that after that movie Sicarius people will think it means Mexican action heroes rather than ultra-orthodox Jewish terrorists.

Sure, but let's do it as a seperate image. It's best to pick and choose individual lines of the same concept rather than dump a whole treatise on them at once. Plus more variety will make it seem like more people care enough to explore the idea.

Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part

Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group

Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

The UN definition still matches our situation, just not in a way normies can digest very easily. If you go to any European nation, and try to homeschool your children, or to teach them to only breed with members of their own race, you can have your children taken from you, if it is discovered, unless of course, you aren't European.

There's no point playing word games. This is war. Total war. Wake up to that fact.

Honestly the idea is awesome but you need to change some keywords in the definition.

Here's an upgraded version (imo):

Reticide is the subtle and systematic annihilation of an ethnic group, usually not through direct violence, but through less overt means. Example include propaganda encouraging the group not to reproduce or to mix with other ethnic groups, systematic pressure intended to encourage ethnic suicide, and institutional campaigns intended to stifle discussion or recognition of the killing through controlling platforms of speech.

I like its versatility and that an English audience already basically gets it without needing explanation. A Quieting is sinister sounding, activates the imagination, and naturally implies the solution - don't be silenced by those seeking to Quiet you.

Reticide, while having a fair ring to it, doesn't mean anything to an English speaker in terms of emotional baggage or intellectual meaning. Reticent is a fairly uncommon word anyway and barely has an emotional meaning to it, while Quiet has been used in horror movies to denote creepy, silent killings for decades. In fact, one of the best horror icons is of a woman whose scream is quieted by the hand of some hidden killer. As for what OP is aiming for, I think the image of a Quieting as a form of smothering is extremely fitting for what he's going for.

Ethnocide is an accurate word for what is happening. OP has his heart in the right place. The problem is that jews aren't new to word games, and have the positional advantage of redefining words to the masses we are trying to reach.

I suppose there is no harm in trying anyway. Latin is our language. Jews have no right to represent us or our choice in creating words out of our languages.

Good job, I felt like the word "race" wouldn't go down well with liberals.

We could include "economic pressure" as an other way of committing reticide. For example how bringing women into the workplace doubled the inflation rate therefore forcing both parents to work or to have less children.

very developed and meaningful, however I don't expect the average person to understand it (perhaps through alabaster as in alabaster skin?) and it can't be used on its own when bringing up other races for argument easing

>patriacide

effective in its variety of situations; more helpful for europe as the left does not consider NA as a white territory

>ethnocide

the most obvious way to convey the point. perhaps too obvious- will get applied to other races and not granted to whites in the same manner as _ pride.

my entry: devicide

apply the definition of reticide in this context: killing the race that developed (thus the dev in devicide) a region. the ethnocide of brits using muslims is devicide. the removal or brutal murder of the few white africans is devicide. you get the idea

It's actually an even younger term than Genocide. An older term is populicide, the killing of a common people. And (((Raphael Lemkin))) coined Genocide in egregious fashion by Latinizing the Greek Genos with the Latinate -cide. Disgusting abuse of language. At least Reticide and Albacide are pure Latin.

I don't think Ethnocide is a good word anyway. Better to stay away from the -cides in general. It's the same problem anons have with calling any hapening a -gate.

that was one of my considerations. the natives do have deep history with the americas, but they have done nothing to develop them. also, a key difference between the invasion of spics in NA and the invasion of whites back then is that the whites came in and slaughtered the natives. the natives could have repelled had they been more advanced. whites don't have that option as no one is willing to admit that forced immigration = war.

Did you mean Tibet? Taiwan is a sovereign country, the leftover remnant of nationalist China, and I've heard there's been a lot of communist subversion but nothing that could be called a snuffing out. They're also the same race as mainland China, while Tibet is a distinct people.

So the Dev from Develop is actually Des, meaning not or lack of. Devicide would mean the lack of killing or not-killing. Develop is a combination of that plus velope (not Latin) which is rolling up something as in envelop. To Develop is to roll out or unfurl something, same original meaning as Evolve.

The Latin is Colo, Colui, Cultum - meaning to cultivate, develop, dwell in, take care of, honor, etc. So your word would be Culticide or Colonicide (referring to the cultivators themselves - colonists), but that's makes English speakers think of various kinds of assholes or the dreaded "colonist" word of modernity. But as consolation you now have a Latin word for when they refer with hatred towards the white colonizers, as they are calling for Colonicide.

>retietus: to cause the death of one that holds silence. from ret- and the word quietus (to cause death).

Well that wouldn't really mean the cause of death so much as holding quiet or something like that. The -cide is the killing part.

I think really fancy Latin, as much as I like it, takes second-place to just some good ol Latin-derived English. It's basically half the language anyway. What we're talking about is literally a Quieting, a process of making something silent as the dead. I really think that's better than all the -cides personally, and it is basically coded language that is veiled yet has a connotation English speakers quickly pick up. It's spooky, sinister, and common-language that you don't need a college degree in ancient languages to parse through.

interesting notes anon, I appreciate how thorough your analysis is. while I think all good candidates could do with a check like this is seems people are stuck on reticide. I guess it does have a ring to it, else we wouldn't all be in this thread.

Well, I won't get in the way of enthusiastic efforts to spread this idea of silent killing. So long as that idea can get a name for people to grasp and attach meaning to, that's good. They should go for it and see if it catches on. If it doesn't, then it's off to try something else. I just enjoy these word-crafting sessions with my favorite ancient language.

Genocide was coined after WW2 by a jew. It combines a greek prefix with a latin suffix which is poor form. It's not our word. We have annihilate, exterminate, extirpate(one of my favorites), along with many others.

If you can get anyone to admit to reticide, then they've already lost. I'd love to see someone make that argument, because it would immediately be followed up by people screaming LOOK AT THIS SHIT! JEW ADMITS TO WHITE GENOCIDE

No, fuck you, this is the right direction. "Genocide" will always, always evoke MUH HOLOCAUST in the NPC hordes' mind. Thus, even so much as using the word in any other context will immediately get you outed as a "crazy conspiracy theorist", etc. Normalfags have been conditioned too hard; introducing an "unknown" to them will break through that enough before they can be similarly conditioned to the word, too.

Speaking of, how long before shitty "comedy" uses "reticide" as spoken by a retarded boomer that You Aren't Supposed To Like or Want to Associate With™? I give it about a year; they'll deny the word exists until then.

>All of these posts implying the mass murder being committed against Europeans is usually indirect and non-violent

It's like you don't acknowledge that the mere presence of subhumans in your general vicinity, who skyrocket all manners of crime and produce nothing of value in their entire lives, is as actively violent as clubbing a kike to death. If you need convincing, go open the black on white crime thread and read every infographic.

1. A word or pronunciation that distinguishes people of one group or class from those of another.

[C14: from Hebrew, literally: ear of grain; the word is used in the Old Testament by the Gileadites as a test word for the Ephraimites, who could not pronounce the sound sh]

Sounds like a jewish strategy to me. It's not like jews haven't been doing this for over 2000 years. Let's all start saying this new made-up word. It's not like it's going to identify me as a /pol/ack. Errr. Shit.

I'll start using the word, it makes perfect sense to use. You can also look at the Geneva convention definition(s) for genocide and one of them aptly applies to this specific form of genocide: reticide - a subversive and implicit form of genocide through non-conventional and deceptive means for population extermination.