@techreport{Dudley2010General,
abstract = {Did breakthroughs in core processes during the Industrial Revolution tend to generate further innovations in downstream technologies? Here a theoretical model examines the effect of a political shock on a non-innovating society in which there is high potential willingness to cooperate. The result is regional specialization in the innovation process by degree of cooperation. Tests with a zero-inflated Poisson specification indicate that 116 important innovations between 1700 and 1849 may be grouped into three categories: (1) General Purpose Technologies (GPTs) tended to be generated in large states with standardized languages following transition to pluralistic political systems; (2) GPTs in turn generated spillovers for their regions in technologies where cooperation was necessary to integrate distinct fields of expertise; (3) however, GPTs discouraged downstream innovation in their regions where such direct cooperation was not required.},
address = {Jena},
author = {Leonard Dudley},
copyright = {http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen},
keywords = {O3; N6; 330; general purpose technologies; Industrial Revolution; innovation; cooperation; spillovers; Industrialisierung; Technologie; R\"{a}umliche Innovationsdiffusion; Spillover-Effekt; Regionale Arbeitsteilung; Sch\"{a}tzung; Welt},
language = {eng},
note = {urn:nbn:de:gbv:27-20110628-135755-6},
number = {1011},
publisher = {Max-Planck-Inst. f\"{u}r \"{O}konomik},
title = {General purpose technologies and the Industrial Revolution},
type = {Papers on economics and evolution},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57524},
year = {2010}
}