winona rosa

Saturday, May 21, 2011

LAWFUL ARGUMENT AGAINST JURISDICTION & SOVEREIGNTY

Hmmmm....I Think You Should Pay Attention To This Post:Read It And See Your ALL ON YOUR OWN:Her Majesty:Did Not Carry Out Duties And Obligations:Coronation Woes?:To Protocol And Proceed:Issues:Fake Stone?Here Is The Heart Our This Matter:

"There are two very important precedents that were established withthis case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminaryargument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction andthe sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was basedon two distinct points. The first point being she was knowingly, andwith malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thushas never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may wish toargue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegdendid at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremonybecause she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract,requiring the monarch's signature. Which brings us to the secondpoint.

At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract,before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost tomaintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with herhand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible andsigning the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, foundin the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictlyprohibited."

Hmmmmmmmmmm..............Lots Of Chin Rubbing: Eh?

http://www.henrymakow.com/hill.html

Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System

May 20, 2011mini-QueenElizabethII-1.jpg

" If everyonebegan using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courtsand in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought toits knees in a matter of weeks if not days."

by Debra Siddons

(henrymakow.com)

For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH)Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and politically-motivated chargeof attempting to "pervert the course of justice". For those of youless familiar with this landmark case, John Anthony Hill is theProducer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For moredetails about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, pleasevisit the following links:-

There are two very important precedents that were established withthis case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminaryargument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction andthe sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was basedon two distinct points. The first point being she was knowingly, andwith malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thushas never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may wish toargue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegdendid at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremonybecause she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract,requiring the monarch's signature. Which brings us to the secondpoint.

At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract,before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost tomaintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with herhand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible andsigning the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, foundin the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictlyprohibited.

The very first time that she gave "royal assent" to any piece ofman-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with theBritish people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect.To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times,which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is thereforewithout question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty ofhigh treason among her other numerous crimes.

All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or "hermajesty's" courts, which means every judge draws their authority fromher. All cases brought by the state are "Regina vs. Xxxxxxx", whichmeans they are all brought in the name of the queen. So if she isn'treally the monarch, then she doesn't have the authority or thejurisdiction to bring a case against anyone else. And neither do anyof "her majesty's" courts or judges.

Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his owncause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealthcould lawfully rule on a challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereigntyof the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they areobviously not impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way thequestion of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be decided is bya jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jurytrial to decide his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty ofElizabeth.

No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right torequest a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause.That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do,they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey VincentPegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision isimmediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The factthat the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particularpoint is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority.

That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyonebegan using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courtsand in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought toits knees in a matter of weeks if not days.

The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey theLaws of God.

These two factual pieces of evidence ought to be presented at thestart, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully.

To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two piecesof evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God's Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed forth maintaining only God's Laws with judges roles clearly defined.

Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in theLawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God.

Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lackedawareness of that which was in place, and there for people to use, butdidn't know. We know now.

For those of you in the United States who may be thinking "hey, wearen't a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?" all youreally need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., standfor the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn't matter whether itis the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BARassociation; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the headof the BAR.

So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now allknow a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACTand use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we can put an end to thisinsanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spreadthe word to as many as possible so that this peaceful rebellion canbegin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of yourfreedoms swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world intobankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their "New World Order".

For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please visit:http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm#crimes

By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end ofthis very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting thissimple plan into motion that you may have forgotten there was a secondprecedent set during this landmark case.

While the official reason for this trial was to address thistrumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to "pervert the courseof justice", the real reason for this trial was so the authoritiescould punish John Anthony Hill for making the "7/7 Ripple Effect"which, in less than an hour and using strictly mainstream mediareports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracytheory. The film is so credible that even the prosecution at thetrial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted thatthe film was made in such a way that it "changes the minds of peoplewho see it." That's how powerful the truth really is.

This was the first time this information was shown at an officialproceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of thejurors felt the film accurately depicted what happened in London onJuly 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. Forthose unfamiliar with the case, JAH forwarded copies of the "7/7Ripple Effect" to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope ofcorrecting misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at theoutset of the first trial of the supposed "7/7 helpers" (who were alsofound not guilty).

John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record histestimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the UnitedStates and that both 9/11 and 7/7 were false flag attacks. He went onto show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of theSalomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. Shereported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and withthe building clearly visible and still standing in the window behindJane Standley's left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC hadforeknowledge of the event.

As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors bythe prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, thetruth that those two events were false flag attacks and that themainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machineis now officially on record.

And the "Not Guilty" verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement ofthat official record.

This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a newbeginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren't just nice soundingwords, but a reality. This could be heaven on earth instead of thehell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow uparound us. Just as John Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all ittakes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil andthe courage to take action to do the right thing, regardless of thepersonal cost.

"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."- Edmund Burke

REGINA/THE QUEEN

V

JAH

LAWFUL ARGUMENT AGAINST JURISDICTION & SOVEREIGNTY

1. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s Fraudulent Coronation.

The person who purports to be the queen has never, in fact, rightfully or Lawfully been crowned as the Sovereign. This knowledge stems from the fact that the Coronation Stone / The Stone of Destiny / Bethel / Jacob’s Pillar that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg was crowned upon is a fake. The real Coronation Stone; made from Bethel porphyry, weighing more than 4cwt. (458lbs.) according to the BBC telex in the film “The Coronation Stone”, (Covenant Recordings), and Ian R. Hamilton Q.C. in three of his books: “No Stone Unturned” (pages 36, 44), “A Touch of Treason” (page 50) and “The Taking of The Stone of Destiny” (pages 27, 35); was removed from Westminster Abbey at 04:00 hrs on the 25th of December in 1950, by his group of four Scottish Nationalist students, which included and was led by Ian Robertson Hamilton himself. The other three were Alan Stuart, Gavin Vernon and Kay Matheson, as stated in his books. Further details at: http://jahtruth.net/stone.htm .

The real Coronation Stone (“National Treasure No. 1”), was taken to Scotland where, in Glasgow, it was handed over to Bertie Gray to repair it, and was later hidden by industrialist and philanthropist John Rollo in his factory, under his office-floor, according to Ian R. Hamilton’s books – “No Stone Unturned” and “The Taking of The Stone of Destiny”, and the factory-manager, when I visited him.

A fake stone copy had previously been made in 1920 by stone-mason, Bertie Gray, for a prior plan to repatriate the Coronation Stone, and it was made of Scottish sandstone from a quarry near Scone in Perthshire, weighing 3cwt. (336lbs.). The conspirators had used it to practice with, before going to London to Westminster Abbey to remove the real Coronation Stone from the abbey. It was that fake stone copy which was placed on the High Altar Stone at Arbroath Abbey, at Midday on the 11th April of 1951, wrapped in a Scottish Saltyre (St. Andrew’s Flag – Dark blue with white diagonal cross on it) and found by the authorities, then transported to England, where it was used for the “queen’s” coronation, according to Bertie Gray’s children in a Daily Record Newspaper article.

Link to Daily Record article

The stone upon which Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg was crowned weighs exactly 3cwt (336lbs.) as attested to by Historic Scotland in their official booklet titled “The Stone of Destiny”, “Symbol of Nationhood”, obtainable from Edinburgh Castle, published by Historic Scotland, (ISBN 1 900168 44 8), who have had the stone that she was crowned on in their care, in Edinburgh Castle, since it was returned to Scotland by John Major’s Conservative government in 1996.

As previously stated, the genuine Coronation Stone weighs more than 4 cwt. (458lbs.), but the one that Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg was crowned on, that has been on display in Edinburgh Castle since 1996, weighs 336lbs, not 458lbs., and thus cannot be the genuine Coronation Stone, for that and other reasons, that I will go into in great and minute detail later, during the hearing on 9th May 2011.

Therefore, never having been Lawfully crowned, she has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s “authority” comes from her.

Further, and without prejudice to the above...

2. Some of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s other Crimes.

Sample Crimes/Points of Law:-

1. Mrs. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg/Mountbatten; un-Lawfully residing in Buckingham Palace, London; also known by the criminal aliases Windsor and QE2, was knowingly and willfully, with malice-aforethought, fraudulently crowned on a fake Coronation Stone / Lia Fail / Stone of Destiny / Bethel / Jacob’s Pillar on June 2nd in 1953, and has been fraudulently masquerading as the rightful British Sovereign/Crown for the last 58 years, which the Defendant can prove beyond doubt, and is a major part of why the fraudulent British so-called “crown” is attacking the Defendant with this false, malicious, frivolous, ridiculous and politically motivated charge. It is Mrs. Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg who should be arrested and charged; for her innumerable acts of high-treason against God and Christ, Whose church she falsely claims to head and in defiance of Whom she had herself fraudulently crowned, and Whom she has continued to rule in defiance of, and in opposition to, ever since; not the Defendant.

2. Allowing people to legislate in defiance of God’s Law (Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32) that she swore and affirmed, in writing, to maintain to the utmost of her power (Exhibit 1), and, in many cases, actually reversing what The Law states into being the very opposite of it. She has fraudulently imprisoned and punished people for enforcing The Law themselves as God commands them to do, and thus un-Lawfully prevented or deterred others from doing so. She has given Royal-Assent to 3,401 Acts of Parliament (as of 24/03/2011) and thus broken The Law against legislating 3,401 times. The very first time she gave “Royal-Assent” to ANY “Act of Parliament”, or any other piece of legislation, or allowed Parliament or anyone to legislate, she broke her Coronation Oath and was thus no longer the monarch, with immediate effect, even if she had been Lawfully crowned in the first-place, which she most definitely was not.

Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add to the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the Commandments of the Lord your God which I COMMAND you.11:1 Therefore thou shalt love the Lord thy God, and keep His charge, and His Statutes, and His Judgments, and His Commandments, always.12:8 Ye shall not do after all the things that we do here this day, every man whatsoever is right in his own eyes.12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

A Bill MUST have Royal Assent before it can become an Act of Parliament (law).

http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/pa...s-royal-assent/

3. Allowing the forming of political parties and demon-crazy (democracy) to divide, weaken, conquer and ruin the people (Deuteronomy 5:32, 17:20; Matthew 12:25).

Deuteronomy 5:32 Ye shall observe to do therefore as the Lord your God hath commanded you: ye shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left.17:20 That his (the Sovereign’s) heart be NOT lifted up ABOVE his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the Commandment, [to] the right hand, or [to] the left…

Matthew 12:25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

4. Removal of the death-penalty that is prescribed as the deterrent for capital crimes in The Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power; e.g. Sodomy (Deuteronomy 23:17; Leviticus 20:13); Pedophilia; Rape; Murder; Adultery; etc., thus encouraging these crimes, that are now legion.

Deuteronomy 23:17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.

Leviticus 20:13 If a man lie also with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Etc., etc., etc.

5. Actually encouraging and promoting sodomy, by legalizing it, then further enacting un-Lawful anti-discrimination legislation, promoting it in schools, and giving knighthoods to high-profile sodomites in the music, film and fashion industries, instead of having them Lawfully executed as a deterrent to others.

6. Enriching herself in defiance of God’s Law that she swore to uphold, at the expense of her subjects, driving them into debt-slavery (Egypt), poverty and homelessness (Deuteronomy 17:14-20). Including the collecting of graven-images and expensive jewellery (her famous art and Fabergé collections, etc.)

Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me;17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, WHOM THE LORD THY GOD SHALL CHOOSE (see Psalm 2): [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.17:16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt (slavery under man-made laws), to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this Law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites:17:19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes, to DO them:17:20 That his heart be NOT lifted up ABOVE his brethren, and that he turn not aside from the Commandment, to the right hand, or to the left…

7. Legalising, facilitating and engaging in usury/interest, that has caused the ruin, bankruptcy and debt-slavery of the entire nation. http://jahtruth.net/greeneco.htm

Deuteronomy 23:19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury/interest to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury:

8. Ignoring the “Year of Release,” where all debts are forgiven/cancelled every seven years, and the “Year of Jubilee” every fifty years, where all property is redistributed back to its owner and the wealth shared out, so that there will be no poor amongst the people.

Deuteronomy 15:1 At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release.15:2 And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the Lord's release.15:4 Save when (to the end that) there be no poor among you; …

Leviticus 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim Liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a Jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.

9. Elizabeth A. M. Battenberg has also broken God’s Law by allowing the EU, which is not the British people’s racial brother, but is a stranger, to rule over you / us, in contravention of Deuteronomy 17:15.

Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that [are] about me;17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set [him] king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest NOT set a stranger over thee, which [is] not thy brother.

Deuteronomy 7:2 And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, [and] utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them:7:3 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.7:4 For they will turn away thy son from following Me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.7:5 But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.7:6 For thou [art] an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto Himself, above all people that [are] upon the face of the earth.7:7 The Lord did not set His love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye [were] the fewest of all people:7:8 But because the Lord loved you, and because He would keep the Oath which He had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.7:9 Know therefore that the Lord thy God, He [is] God, the faithful God, which keepeth Covenant and mercy with them that love Him and keep His Commandments to a thousand generations;7:10 And repayeth them that hate (or disobey) Him to their face, to destroy them: He will not be slack to him that hateth (or disobeyeth) Him, He will repay him to his face.7:11 Thou shalt therefore KEEP the Commandments, and the Statutes, and the Judgments, which I command thee this day, to DO them.7:12 Wherefore it shall come to pass, if ye hearken to these Judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee The Covenant and the mercy which He sware unto thy fathers:7:13 And He will love thee, and bless thee, and multiply thee: He will also bless the fruit of thy womb, and the fruit of thy land, thy corn, and thy wine, and thine oil, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheep, in the land which He sware unto thy fathers to give thee.7:14 Thou shalt be blessed above all people: there shall not be male or female barren among you, or among your cattle.7:15 And the Lord will take away from thee all sickness, and will put none of the evil diseases of Egypt, which thou knowest, upon thee; but will lay them upon all [them] that hate thee.7:16 And thou shalt consume all the people which the Lord thy God shall deliver thee; thine eye shall have no pity upon them: neither shalt thou serve their gods; for that [will be] a snare unto thee.7:17 If thou shalt say in thine heart, These nations [are] more than I; how can I dispossess them?7:18 Thou shalt not be afraid of them: [but] shalt well remember what the Lord thy God did unto Pharaoh, and unto all Egypt (and pharaoh ruled the whole known world at that time);7:19 The great temptations which thine eyes saw, and the signs, and the wonders, and the mighty hand, and the stretched out arm, whereby the Lord thy God brought thee out: so shall the Lord thy God do unto all the people of whom thou art afraid.7:20 Moreover the Lord thy God will send the hornet among them, until they that are left, and hide themselves from thee, be destroyed.7:21 Thou shalt not be affrighted at them: for the Lord thy God [is] among you, a mighty God and terrible.7:22 And the Lord thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee.7:23 But the Lord thy God shall deliver them unto thee, and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed.7:24 And He shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven: there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou have destroyed them.7:25 The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire: thou shalt not desire the silver or gold [that is] on them, nor take [it] unto thee, lest thou be snared therein: for it [is] an abomination to the Lord thy God.7:26 Neither shalt thou bring an abomination into thine house, lest thou be a cursed thing like it: [but] thou shalt utterly detest it, and thou shalt utterly abhor it; for it [is] a cursed thing.8:1 All the Commandments which I command thee this day shall ye observe to do, that ye may live, and multiply, and go in and possess the land which the Lord sware unto your fathers.8:2 And thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, [and] to test thee, to know what [was] in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep His Commandments (Law), or not.

God warned His people, YOU, the British-Israel people ( http://jahtruth.net/britca.htm ), in the Revelation/Apocalypse to John, to come out of the Mother of Harlots’, abominable (Rev. 17:5) Babylonian ( http://jahtruth.net/robab.htm ) Market System:-

Revelation/Apocalypse 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, COME OUT of her, MY people, that ye take not part in her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues (punishment).

10. She has allowed Witchcraft and condoned it - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12...oD-reveals.html - and Satanism - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3948329.stm - in her/the realm and in her/the armed forces.

Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

Deuteronomy 18:9 When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations.18:10 There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [or] an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a WITCH,18:11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a WIZARD, or a necromancer (medium).18:12 For all that do these things [are] an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.18:13 Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God (Matt. 5:48).

Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven IS perfect.

Deuteronomy 32:15 But the Beloved waxed fat, and rebelled: thou art waxen fat, thou art grown thick, thou art covered [with fatness]; then he forsook God [which] made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation.32:16 They provoked Him to jealousy with strange [gods], with abominations provoked they Him to anger.32:17 They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new [gods that] came newly up, whom your fathers feared not.

Revelation/Apocalypse 21:7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my (adopted) son.21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and SORCERERS, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with Fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

She has given an O.B.E. to Joanne "Jo" Rowling (J. K. Rowling), who promotes witchcraft, thus herself condoning the promotion of witchcraft, and the poisoning of the minds of the nation and its children.

The other and major part of witchcraft/sorcery, that she has also allowed, and probably actually invested in, is the chemical and pharmaceutical industry that is slowly poisoning the nation through chemical-fertilizers, pesticides, chemtrails, vaccines, etc., and other pharmaceutical products/medicines/poisons (witches’ brews / potions) in order to maximize their profits, because they do not make any money from healthy people. That is why there are more sick people every year and a correspondingly higher NHS budget, rather than less sick people and a correspondingly shrinking NHS budget. The NHS, doctors and pharmacists are therefore obviously harming the population, not healing it. http://www.rense.com/general34/quotes.htm http://jahtruth.net/heal.htm

Note well that it states in Revelation/Apocalypse 21:8 “ALL LIARS shall have their part in the lake which burneth with Fire and Brimstone . . .” and the word Parliament means “Speaking Lies” from the French words Parler which means to speak, and mentir which means to tell lies. Also the word Politics, poly meaning many; tics are blood-sucking parasites; thus politics means many blood-sucking parasites.

11. Each and every single one of the above crimes carries the death-penalty, with public execution; under The Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power; for not doing so, along with all those who likewise reject The Law of God — Deuteronomy 17:8-13, 27:26; Malachi chapter 4.

Deuteronomy 17:8 If there arise a matter too hard for thee in Judgment, between blood and blood, between plea and plea, and between stroke and stroke, being matters of controversy within thy gates: then shalt thou arise, and get thee up into the place which the Lord thy God shall choose;17:9 And thou shalt come unto the priests the Levites, and unto the judge that shall be in those days, and enquire; and they shall show thee The Sentence of Judgment:17:10 And thou shalt do according to The Sentence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose shall show thee; and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee:17:11 According to The Sentence of The Law which they shall teach thee, and according to the Judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do: thou shalt not decline to do The Sentence which they shall show thee, and turn not away from it to the right hand, nor to the left.17:12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thus thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.17:13 And all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously (in thinking they are a law unto themselves).

27:26 Cursed be he (like Elizabeth) that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to DO them.

Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy The Law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill (in the Greek Original – pleroo = to fully preach it).5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from The Law, till ALL (the Prophecies) be fulfilled.5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least Commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of heaven.5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes (lawyers) and Pharisees (politicians), ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of heaven.

James 2:10 He who breaks the least of these Commandments and teaches others to do so is guilty of all.

The renowned English jurist Sir William Blackstone famously stated, “No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.”

All of The Law references quoted are copied from the Sovereign’s Bible (Exhibit 2) upon which Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg’s Coronation Oath (Exhibit 1) was sworn (all emphasis mine), containing God’s Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power. It is a special large print and specially bound edition of the king James Authorised Version (1611) of the Holy Bible, that she placed her right hand upon, swore the Coronation Oath upon and then kissed, before she signed the Coronation Oath (Exhibit 1).

12. Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg is therefore not only massively in breach of contract, but also massively in breach of The Law, and thus is not only NOT the Lawful Sovereign, never has been, and thus has NO jurisdiction to prosecute me, but is also a criminal, guilty of capital crimes, that carry the death-penalty, according to The Law she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power. That Perfect Royal Law of Liberty was given by God to the British-Israel peoples to protect the British-Israel peoples from exploitation, oppression, poverty and harm, and which God has warned the British-Israel peoples to return to, with dire consequences for failure to do so. Her obscene wealth and that of her relatives, cronies and accomplices must be seized and shared out amongst the poor and homeless.

Malachi 4:1 For, behold, the Day cometh, that shall burn like an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave of them neither root nor branch (nothing).4:2 But unto you that fear My name shall the Sun of Righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.4:3 And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in The Day that I shall do [this], saith the Lord of hosts.4:4 Remember ye (and return to) The Law of Moses My servant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb for all Israel, [with] the Statutes and Judgments.4:5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the Prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful Day of the Lord:4:6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse (see verse 1).

13. The person who purports to be queen was, in fact, as proven above, never rightfully nor Lawfully the Sovereign/Crown. Therefore the Crown/Prosecution/Regina has NO authority to put the defendant on trial and the judge has NO authority to try him, because the judge’s authority comes from her.

14. In addition, without prejudice to the above, based on God’s Law that she swore to maintain to the utmost of her power (Exhibit 1) the “queen” is in breach of contract. She has amongst other things accumulated a large amount of personal wealth and done many other things that are expressly forbidden, some of which are listed above, and so she has breached her contract with God and the British-Israel people. Therefore, even if, which is not admitted, the “queen” was genuinely crowned, the breach of contract disqualifies her from sitting and renders null and void proceedings instituted in her name.

It is therefore of the utmost importance that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg and the Sovereign’s Bible, that is kept in Lambeth Palace*, be present in court on May 9th for my challenge to her jurisdiction and sovereignty to be heard, and for me to face my false-accuser, examine her and have her arrested.

* Class-Mark Ref. No.: E185 1953 [**] Signed: _______________________

Date: 31/03/2011

Here Is The Heart Of The Matter Below The Link Where You Can Find The Rest:Brilliant:Timely:StarStuff:Devine.......Actions In The Interests Of All Those Concerned.....Fire: Mo:on: GhostChild: Pacient One.

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/

"Thanks to a British legal system that so desperately wanted to keep him under lock and key that on 4 occasions they didn't deliver him from prison to his scheduled bail hearings, he spent a total of 157 days in prison.

Image and video hosting by TinyPicThe "7/7 Ripple Effect" DVD

Supposedly this was for sending DVDs of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" film to the UK court that was trying 3 innocent terror patsies whom the British government falsely accused of "helping" the 4 alleged 7/7 bombers. In reality the British government was punishing Muad'Dib for making the film and hoping that they could silence him by throwing him in one of "her majesty's" dungeons. What they didn't bank on though was that Muad'Dib would challenge their entire system, including the sovereignty of Elizabeth A.M. Battenberg/Mountbatten, who is known by the criminal alias "Elizabeth II" and "the House of Windsor". She is the richest woman on the planet and has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.

Elizabeth A.M. Battenberg is not only the head of the Church (of England) and State (the U.K. and the British Commonwealth), but she is also head of the BAR (British Accreditation Registry), the head of the Committee of 300 and of the New World Order (NWO). And the very last thing the NWO wants is for someone to expose their false flag operations, the way Muad'Dib's film "7/7 Ripple Effect" has done. If you haven't seen the film yet, please go to http://jforjustice.co.uk/77 and download it now. It's a free tutorial on how these false flag operations are pulled off.

Confronting the Queen

Why would Muad'Dib challenge the entire system instead of focusing on the trumped-up charge they had used to lock him up? Because he has rock-solid proof that Elizabeth is a fraud and exposing her would put a major spanner in the works of the NWO endless war of terror machine and their plans to exterminate over 90% of the world's population of "useless eaters" (or "consumers", if you prefer that word).

So what does the richest, most powerful woman on the planet do when she is about to be embarrassed and exposed as a fraud? She cheated, that's what she did. Please see the following link for a summary of how the first day of Muad'Dib's Trial went, where Elizabeth's sovereignty and the jurisdiction of "her majesty's" courts were questioned.

http://mtrial.org/node/129

There was no way THEY* could let of a jury see the irrefutable evidence and proof of her fraud that Muad'Dib has, so they first had a corrupt judge deny Muad'Dib's witness application behind closed doors and then purportedly send the paperwork to the wrong address so Muad'Dib wouldn't learn of it before the trial. That was followed up by the presiding judge at the trial denying Muad'Dib the basic right to a jury in the preliminary matter of his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Elizabeth.

*THEY = The Hierarchy Enslaving You

Please think about this for a moment. Every judge in the U.K. has sworn an oath to Elizabeth. Every judge in the U.K. draws both their salary and their authority from Elizabeth. It should therefore be obvious that no judge in the U.K. could be impartial in a matter that questioned Elizabeth's authority and thus called into question the judge's authority as well. It's a blatant conflict of interest and that's exactly why Muad'Dib had lawfully requested a jury to decide the matter.

You can ask for a jury trial for a traffic citation, so why couldn't someone request a jury trial to decide a matter impossible for a judge to fairly decide? Are you starting to see just how afraid of this evidence THEY really are?

So THEY cheated and the judge ignored Muad'Dib's Challenge. THEY were anxious to move on to the trial, get a conviction on this ridiculous charge, and get Muad'Dib back in one of "her majesty's" prisons to silence him and teach everyone else to think twice before challenging the system.

Confident in their plan, THEY decided it would be in their best interest to finally allow their government controlled propaganda machine to let the story out, which they did on the 10th, as the trial on this trumped up charge of attempting to "…pervert the course of justice…" proceeded. Please see http://mtrial.org/node/131 or google "7/7 bombers 'were innocent patsies'."

The Flaw in their plan

The one big flaw in their plan though was a complete lack of evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of Muad'Dib. But hey, what are lawyers/barristers for if not to put on a convincing show for the jurors in the complete absence of anything of substance.

And that's exactly what THEY did. The prosecution spent hours going over DNA evidence, fingerprints and witness statements linking Muad'Dib to the DVDs that were sent to the UK court despite Muad'Dib readily confirming he sent the DVDs multiple times. A previous judge had ordered the prosecution months ago not to waste any more time or taxpayers' money on a completely unnecessary investigation of this very clearly established and undisputed fact.

So sure of themselves, the prosecution next decided to show the jury the "7/7 Ripple Effect”. Finally a productive use of everyone's time. Apparently it did not have the desired effect that the prosecution had anticipated, but we'll get to that in a moment.

The prosecution then presented as evidence audio files from the "7/7 Ripple Effect" extracted from Muad'Dib's computers that had been stolen during his initial arrest back in February of 2009. It was very kind of them to work so diligently to dig those files out of Muad'Dib's personal computer so that the jurors could hear again those parts of the film which have been in the public domain since the 5th of November 2007.

The "Case Cracker"

Then came the case cracker. The prosecution described to the jury how an "expert" had examined the http://jforjustice.co.uk website and email addresses, and found the website contained an identical copy of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the DVD copies of the film that were sent to the Kingston Crown court. Some more amazing detective work which we can only hope wasn't as costly as the totally unnecessary DNA evaluation. Of course the prosecutor could have simply asked Muad'Dib, who would have confirmed that the film content was the same online as on the DVDs, but that wouldn't have provided the drama that the prosecution was going for with the jurors. Remember, when you don't have any real evidence, you have to try to dazzle your audience/jurors with tricks and nonsense.

The prosecution ran out of undisputed facts to prove, so they rested. Muad'Dib took the stand.

Image and video hosting by TinyPicMuad'Dib (aka John Anthony Hill)

What Muad'Dib shared wasn't really much different than what has been shared during the interviews he has done on "The Real Deal". He shared the story of how and why the film was made, and mentioned that he had seen the film "9/11 Ripple Effect" by Dave von Kleist from the Power Hour, an independent American TV show, which impressed him and inspired the title of the "7/7 Ripple Effect".

Muad'Dib explained that he had been motivated to send the DVDs of his film to the Kingston Crown court after learning of the misleading and outrageous statements made by Judge Peter Gross and QC Neil Flewitt at the first Kingston trial in their attempt to mislead the jurors into thinking there was no doubt that the 4 alleged bombers (Khan, Tanweer, Lindsay and Hussain) carried out the 7/7/2005 London bombings. How could a judge and a QC/prosecutor not be familiar with the presumption of innocence? The 4 alleged bombers have never been proven guilty in a court of law, or in any legitimate and independent public enquiry, and millions of people doubt the official government conspiracy theory. The 4 alleged bombers have only been tried in the government controlled propaganda machine, also known as the mainstream media.

"In Care of the Court"

Back to the Southwark Crown court and the case of Regina vs. Muad'Dib, we were then told that the DVDs sent to the judge and the jury foreman were sent IN CARE OF THE COURT, giving the Kingston court complete discretion over whether the material was then forwarded on to the judge and the jury. So how could sending information through the proper channels to the court to correct lies being told to the jurors by the judge and prosecutor be considered a crime? Well it certainly couldn't be considered improper to address information to the judge in care of the court because the judge should be able to determine whether the content of the film was relevant or not to the case in question. The judge at Southwark agreed and so that charge/count was dropped during Muad'Dib's Testimony.

The prosecution then moved on to the BBC hit piece, which the government controlled propaganda machine had used to try to discredit Muad'Dib in the hope of reversing the popularity of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" which was in the process of going viral. The prosecutor wanted to know why Muad'Dib had not participated, acting as if he had something to hide.

Muad'Dib pointed out that he had given the BBC his conditions before participating, which were that the BBC show the film unedited in its entirety on prime time, a condition they did not meet, and therefore Muad'Dib told them he would not cooperate with them in any way. The BBC then stalked him and ambushed him outside his home, which backfired on them as the "7/7 Ripple Effect" became even more popular as a result of the BBC hit piece.

But maybe the most telling story of all was the prosecution's admission that the film was made in such a way that it "changes the minds of the people who see it".

Isn't that the real reason THEY are so afraid of the film?

In the movie "Dune" Muad'Dib trained The Fremen/Freemen to use The (Weirding) Way of battle. The reason that it sounds "weird" to people is because it is the TRUTH, which cuts through all of the lies and can most definitely change the minds of the people who "see" and "hear" it.

Isaiah 33:19 "Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a ridiculous (weird sounding) way of talking [The Truth], [that thou (the majority who believe they are human) can] not understand."

(For a more detailed explanation of the movie "Dune", please visit http://jahtruth.net/dune)

The prosecution may not have understood the Truth contained in the "7/7 Ripple Effect" and in the testimony of Muad'Dib, but the jury sure did. They saw through the prosecution's smoke and mirrors and found Muad'Dib not guilty, just as one would expect a fully-informed jury to do in such a clear-cut case of political persecution.

NOT GUILTY!

No wonder THEY were afraid to have a jury decide Muad'Dib's Challenge of the court's jurisdiction and Elizabeth's sovereignty. As George Orwell said, "in times of universal deceit, telling the Truth is a revolutionary act" or a (weird sounding) way of talking to most. If you haven't seen the Ripple Effect films, it's high time that you learn The (Weirding) Way and watch them both.

"9/11 Ripple Effect" about the September 11th, 2001 false flag attack in the U.S.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6847507648836588010#

"7/7 Ripple Effect" about the July 7th, 2005 false flag attack in the U.K.http://jforjustice.co.uk/77

Image and video hosting by TinyPicTruth Will Out

Hopefully people will build on this victory and help to dismantle the NWO/Global Elite before Elizabeth and her evil colleagues are able to complete their plans to kill most of us off through WW3 and poisoning us in various ways. The time to fight them is now, and the man to show us The Way is Muad'Dib.

Long Live The Fighters!

This special report was prepared with the assistance of Rob, a follower and close friend of Muad'Dib who, along with Nicholas Kollerstrom, the author of TERROR ON THE TUBE (revised and expanded edition, 2011), has kept me informed of developments in this case. For more, listen to my archived interviews with them on "The Real Deal", http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com