Intel's "tick tock" development cycle continues to
chime with the Nehalem processor architecture scheduled for production
next year. Intel Senior Vice President Pat Gelsinger detailed the advanced
features on the next-generation to DailyTech earlier today.

In the second half of this year, Intel will release its first 45nm Penryn-based
processors. While nearly identical architecturally to the Core 2 Duo
processors released last year, Penryn's 45nm node allows Intel to put
more L2 cache onboard; the company already announced Penryn-based
processors will utilize up to 12MB of L2 cache on quad-core designs.

Intel's 45nm node utilizes metal transistor gates and high-k dielectrics.
The departure from silicon-based transistors translates to a 5-fold reduction in source-drain
leakage and a 10-fold reduction in dielectric leakage. According to Intel
guidance, this means existing processors could run 20% faster just by switching
to metal gate and high-k transistors. Gelsinger claims mature Penryn processors
will operate in excess of 3 GHz per core, with 1600 MHz front-side busses on
server platforms.

After the 45nm shrink has matured, Intel will then incorporate architectural
changes into its processor family, currently dubbed Nehalem. Nehalem
is still a 4-issue architecture similar to Core, but new advances in
management and scalability give Nehalem its new micro architecture
designation.

Earlier this year Intel roadmaps stated Hyper-Threading would appear on some Penryn
processors. Shortly after, Intel retracted the roadmap, stating that
simultaneous multi-threading will not reappear until 2008. This was made
evident today when Intel unveiled its next-generation threading plans for Nehalem.

High-end server Nehalem-family processors have eight cores. Coupled with
2-way threading, these processors appear as 16 logical CPUs. This
threading is dynamic: Threads can be powered on and off depending on the
application needs.

Dynamic threading isn't the only on-the-fly operation for Nehalem.
Almost everything about Nehalem can be dynamically managed: Power,
threads, bus, cache and cores. This management is primarily a
power-saving feature, but also allows for saleable designs as well.

The bulk of these changes are possible due to Nehalem's on-board memory
controller. AMD realized the advantages of integrated memory controllers
(IMCs) with the introduction of its Opteron series processors four years ago. Intel has long toyed with with IMCs on some processors, and will even deliver the Tolapai system-on-a-chip later this year with an integrated memory controller.

Intel's dynamic bus, the Common System Interface (CSI), is clearly a focal
point for the Nehalem architecture. With many respects, CSI is very
similar to HyperTransport: Variable, serial interconnects for
processor-to-processor communication. CSI will not only make its debut on
Nehalem, but design engineers have also confirmed to DailyTech that CSI
will have a large presence on next-generation Itanium platforms as well.

Intel leaves a single teaser in its Nehalem design guidance: "High
performance integrated graphics engine for client." Speaking on
background, Intel insiders stated "The majority of the Intel Northbridge
is already on the Nehalem die, so adding the final logic to include graphics is
essentially [trivial] with the correct bus support." Intel's renewed interest in graphics processing came just weeks after AMD made similiar announcements, which AMD has codenamed Fusion.

Intel's "tick tock" strategy doesn't end at the 45nm node. In
2009 Intel will optically shrink Nehalem process from 45nm to
32nm. In a sense, it's the same move Intel is currently undertaking with
the transition from Conroe to Penryn. Nehalem's 32nm
shrink is dubbed Westmere. The 32nm architecture that will succeed
Westmere is dubbed Gesher.

Comments

Threshold

Username

Password

remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Device manager should be able to give you some information about the chipset. Although you probably have the 850e chipset.

533MHz FSB is ideal for pc1066 RDRAM.. so you should use that or get a Northwood-B P4 and see how the tables turn. I *highly* doubt the Celeron would be faster.. even with the 400MHz FSB.. as the 850e chipset and pc1066 RDRAM is a very solid performer.