http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ATAG1-PR-issues.html#Level
I believe the issue raised by Bruce Roberts, Lotus is not being address or
resolved.
The issues as stated by Bruce
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0152.html
>2) Re-open priority definitions to capture the idea of "average" user
>that's been used in direct conversation to assign priority level to
checkpoints.
As a working group we've added a definition of "skill level of the author"
as it applies the definition of priorities.
But we haven't really addressed the notion of assuming a higher level of
skilled user and therefore being able to lower the priorities assigned.
Regards,
Phill Jenkins