"... it is indispensible to trouble in all countries the peoples relations with government so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the INOCULATION OF DISEASES, by want, so that the goyim see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else."- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, written 1897

Pages

2012-04-17

Vatic Note: Normally, Bruecke is our resident expert and conveyor of 9-11 info and analysis, but I am the music buff as you can see in the "vatic music" section off to the right and down a ways. Notice I have Several Simon and Garfunkel videos up from their hay days with songs that had so much meaning reflecting the social conditions of the day when the songs were popular. That was back when musicians reflected through their art, the ills of society so we could see it early before it was too late. That is why so many of them were killed. Paul Simon has not lost that courage or the fight in him to seek and tell the truth, so that is why I have put this up. However, there is a lot of excellent information and analysis in current time frame, about 9-11, that we should all read and digest. We have this song up on our blog under vatic music, please feel free to visit it. Its so appropriate for 9-11, and it also reminds us of what "REAL" music used to sound like that touches ones soul. Given the soul-less now control our music industry, we don't hear it anymore, I am sorry to say.

Paul Simon stepped to the microphone at Ground Zero and something amazing happened.

The legendary singer/songwriter had been asked to sing the non-threatening Bridge Over Troubled Waters at the ceremony for 9/11’s 10th anniversary ceremonies in New York, but
he didn’t. Instead, he launched into a haunting version of another
classic that begins, “Hello darkness, my old friend.” Simon had decided
that the most appropriate statement for this occasion would come from The Sound of Silence.

“Fools”, said I, “You do not know
Silence like a cancer grows…

Was he protesting the fact that firefighters had not been allowed to
attend the ceremony, or was it even deeper, that the real truth about
9/11 was not being spoken? I don’t know, but his choice was not an
accident.

This was the most emotional 9/11 moment of the year and possibly the
most encouraging. The “acceptable” mainstream response to the
anniversary of this dark day was a kind of contrived solemnity (I mean
media, government officials, and the like – not the public). It was
propaganda that did not honour the victims – it sought to bury the truth
about what happened to them.

This 10th anniversary year was a significant one in the
fight for 9/11 truth. I include the anniversary and everything that came
with it as one of my nine biggest 9/11 stories of the year. That
includes the phony media build-up and all the bogus retrospectives
designed to tug at our emotions and bypass our brains.

Here are the other key 9/11 stories as I saw them (in no particular
order). I’m sure readers have more, and some may disagree with the ones
I’ve chosen. I look forward to your input about what mattered to you in
2011:

2) Gage bails on Citizen Investigation Team, ignores rebuke:
The founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Richard Gage,
shocked many in the movement in February when he released a statement
withdrawing support for the Pentagon research of CIT and their founders,
Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis. Gage had offered an endorsement of their
work, but had subsequently come under heavy pressure to denounce them
and their film National Security Alert.

Apparently Gage caved to this pressure, because in February he
released a statement posted on 911blogger.com (the site that has banned
most CIT supporters and whose contributors delight in bashing CIT
unopposed).

Gage made the incredible statement that despite being initially impressed by National Security Alert, he later was “surprised” to learn that the witnesses who contradicted the official flight path also said they did see the plane hit the building. This was an odd thing to say given that the witnesses say this clearly in the film.

Gage’s statement endorsed the research of such dubious names as Chris
Sarns, Victoria Ashley, Jim Hoffman, Frank Legge, Warren Stutt, Jeff
Hill, and Gregg Roberts. In doing so, he threw his weight behind the
idea that we can’t prove a 757 didn’t hit the Pentagon and that
one probably did. He would have been much better to stay out of the
Pentagon discussion altogether. The cause and Gage’s credibility have
suffered.

'In the end, Gage suggests we stick to the idea that a 757 should not
have been able to hit the Pentagon and avoid saying the no 757 hit. In
other words, allow incompetence as an explanation, thereby letting the
perpetrators off the hook.
In April, a group of 27 truthers (I was one) wrote Gage a letter
protesting his actions and calling on him to explain his shocking
embrace of the anti-CIT hit squad. He never replied.

3) 9/11 patsy Osama bin Laden is “killed” by U.S. special forces: At
the beginning of May, the American media reported that the mastermind
of 9/11 had been killed by U.S. special forces in a raid on his compound
in Islamabad, Pakistan. No reporters questioned whether this was true
or not; they just reported it as fact. And it happened just in time for
the 10th anniversary commemorations of 9/11. How convenient.

And Barack Obama, clearly the darling of big money and the global
elite, got the credit for this momentous accomplishment. After all, the
government had been hunting bin Laden all those years, right?

How clever
of him to hide in a large, highly fortified compound a short distance
from a Pakistani military installation.

Where does one begin with a story this transparently bogus? To start
with, the story changed almost hourly. First it was a firefight with bin
Laden being armed. Then he was unarmed. He used his wife as a shield.
Then he didn’t.

The most obvious thing was that the body was dumped at sea,
supposedly in keeping with Islamic tradition. How religiously tolerant
of them. It also saved the government from having to prove that the
death had actually happened.
We were also told that plans for future 9/11-like attacks were in the
works.

It didn’t occur to anyone in the media to point out that killing
an unarmed bin Laden (a known CIA asset whose family has ties to the
Bush clan going back to the ‘70s) might make it harder to thwart these
supposed attacks.

And, of course, there won’t be any messy trials that might bring out information that contradicts the 9/11 official story.

4) Gallop suit against top Bush officials thrown out of court by Bush cousin: Former
U.S. Army executive administrative assistant April Gallop pursued her
lawsuit against Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Gen. Richard Myers for
damages in connection with injuries she and her newborn son suffered at
the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

What she didn’t know when she first launched the suit was that it
would ultimately be thrown out of court on appeal by Judge John M.
Walker, a cousin of George W. Bush. As you’d expect, the mainstream
media ignored the story (with the exception of CNBC). Gallop’s lawyer,
William Veale, tried unsuccessfully to get Walker disqualified from the
case.

Gallop was at her desk when a large explosion caused the ceiling
above her to collapse. When she regained consciousness, she made her
way, son in tow, through the hole the alleged Flight 77 was supposed to
have created. She saw no bodies, no airplane parts, no jet fuel, nothing
to suggest a plane had hit the building.

Gallop launched the original lawsuit in 2008 alleging that the 9/11
attacks were planned at the highest levels of the U.S. government, and
that they were blamed on fundamentalist Muslims as part of a cover
story.

She claims that there was plenty of knowledge that employees of
the Pentagon were in imminent danger, and that had alarms been sounded
many deaths and injuries would have been prevented.

5) Toronto 9/11 Hearings virtually ignore Pentagon evidence: One
of the major events of the year was a set of hearings that took place
in Toronto, Canada that was scheduled to coincide with the 10th anniversary of 9/11.

The idea was to have expert “witnesses” who would present compelling
evidence to a trio of moderators refuting the 9/11 official story. It
was decided that only the “least controversial” evidence would be
considered because it would more likely lead to consensus. This meant no
invitation to CIT or to native Torontonian Barrie Zwicker, a leading
member of the Truth movement and avid CIT supporter.

There were numerous witnesses who presented evidence that the World
Trade Center was destroyed in a controlled demolition, but the Pentagon
was almost ignored. We had a 25-minute presentation about explosives in
the Pentagon by Barbara Honegger and a 45-minute talk by David Ray
Griffin about anomalies related to Flight 77. That’s less than an hour
and a half out of a four-day event.

But there were other fascinating presenters whose focus was less on
the physical science of the event and more on the psychological and
political aspects (along with evidence regarding the alleged hijackers
and the insider trading that preceded 9/11).

The event will result in a final report that is eagerly awaited.

CIT held a Toronto screening of National Security Alert after the hearings were over. This event was successful, drawing about 200 people.

6) Griffin looks to mend fences in the movement: David Ray Griffin published his 10th book on 9/11 this fall (9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed),
and it contained a new direction for the prolific and highly respected
author.

In the book’s chapter on the Pentagon, Griffin went over the
case made by CIT critics that a plane did hit, and then countered that
with his own arguments that none did.

Griffin’s case was the vastly stronger of the two arguments, and I
credit him with not caving to the pressure to denounce CIT as Gage did.
But the problem, as I saw it, was that he elevated the importance of the
dubious Pentagon “research” of David Chandler, Jonathan Cole, and Frank
Legge.

His new position was to put aside the “relatively unimportant”
question of whether a plane hit and to concentrate on the overwhelming
evidence that a 757 piloted by al-Qaeda did not. The idea, I gather, was
to break the impasse created by the entrenched positions for and
against CIT’s position that a plane flew towards the building but did
not hit.

Griffin’s Toronto address was genuinely perplexing because it relied
almost exclusively on positions put forward by Chandler, Cole, and Legge
on every aspect of the Pentagon event. In doing so, he gave them a
standing that they have not earned.

7) Griffin unveils 9/11 Consensus Panel: Griffin was
involved in another major consensus-related initiative this year
designed to create a bank of reliable information about the failings of
the 9/11 official story that the media and the public can refer to.

In early September the formation of the 9/11 Consensus Panel was
announced. It is an expert panel of academics, scientists, pilots,
journalists, and other prominent members of the 9/11 Truth movement. The
group was created to assemble a list of points that have achieved
consensus status by virtue of receiving the approval of 85% of the
panel.

So far, 13 points have already been agreed upon and can be read on
the panel’s web site. These are hardly groundbreaking, and only one
Pentagon point is listed. But more will be added, maybe hundreds more,
according to co-founder Elizabeth Woodworth. The key to this effort will
be adding more – and stronger – points to the list as quickly as
possible.

8) Direct democracy given a chance through Citizens 9/11 Commission:
One
of the most promising initiatives by the Truth movement in 2011 was the
effort to place a ballot initiative before voters in at least one of
the 26 states that have an initiative law. This would allow voters in a
given state to vote on whether or not they want a new investigation into
9/11 to be initiated.

Fronted and founded by former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel, the
commission seeks to get on the ballot in one or more states for the 2012
presidential election. The effort took centre stage when Gravel gave a
presentation on the Commission at the Toronto 9/11 Hearings in
September.

The initial target of the project was Massachusetts, but the short
time frame and lack of funds to collect signatures led the organizers
redirect their focus to other states. The ones currently being targeted
are Oregon, Alaska, and California.
According to the web site (9-11cc.org):

“Because our established
federal institutions are unable to address the unanswered questions
about 9/11, we have no choice but to circumvent them.

And that is why
our campaign has turned to the state initiative process, the only
legally constituted forum for an appeal to the people through the method
of direct democracy.”

Campaign seeking to raise awareness about Building 7 expands:

Remember
Building 7 is a campaign launched in late 2010 using local TV ads to
educate New Yorkers about Building 7, which the majority of city
residents had never seen footage of. The goal of the effort is to take
the ad campaign to other U.S. cities like Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los
Angeles, and San Francisco.

In 2011, Remember Building 7 produced new ads calling for an
investigation of what happened to Building 7. There have also been print
ads in New York and there will be more in the cities listed above. The
fundraising goal for this campaign is $1 million. About 8% of that has
been raised so far.
Campaigns like this help to show the world that this fight isn’t over, that it’s just warming up.

***

There is much more one could say about 9/11 and 2011. There was a lot
of excellent research done, and much creative thinking went into
finding new approaches to further the cause of 9/11 truth.

But really, the biggest ongoing story is the tragic fallout from the
fake “terrorist attacks” of 2001. Many hundreds of thousands of innocent
people have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the U.S. government is
now actively preparing the way for an invasion of Iran.

In the meantime, the freedom of Americans and others around the world
is being hacked away in the name of security. The powers that be create
fear with false flag operations and then they ride to the rescue with
new security measures to keep us safe. The problem is that this safety
comes at the expense of freedoms once taken for granted.

The National Defence Authorization Act, for example, would make it
legal for the government to arrest and detain anyone they want on
American soil and hold them until the “end of hostilities.”

In other
words, they can be held forever in direct contravention of the U.S.
Constitution. This erosion of freedom is only getting worse, and elected
officials aren’t even pretending to care. They think the country and
the world isn’t noticing what’s happening or doesn’t care. (VN: I don't believe its because they don't care, I believe its because they are being blackmailed with the "Sampson Option" since at least some are incorruptable, so the only explanation for the politicians of the entire globe to remain silent at best is the belief these crazies from Rothschild khazar/Israeli bankers would destroy the world if they cannot succeed in this thousand year agenda as they have planned, to globalize and take control of the planet. There has to be a DEEP BELIEF that these people are seriously insane and would do as threatened)

It’s up to all of us to prove them wrong.AdvertisementThe article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

1 comment:

Russ Hallberg Jr
said...

Paul Simon slipped one past them!

The rejection of the CIT Pentagon evidence fits the thermite agenda. By hanging hats on thermite, the truth relies on a red herring. At some point, the other side merely has to state that thermite was used in the clean up. It would have been useful, cutting the steel beams.

The Toronto Conference coincided with Global Research's Montreal Conference, the attempting to obscure the Montreal Conference.

The Rothschilds are "keepers of the Vatican treasury." The Bank of Rome begot the Bank of England, which begot the FED. The Rothschilds are Knights of Malta. "The Secret Terrorists" is free, online. The four people hung and the one who was shot for the Lincoln assassination(s) were all Catholic.

Translate

Vatic Quotation

Vatic Search

Loading...

Vatic Donations

We cannot do this alone anymore, particularly when the harassment increases, impacts our livelihoods, and causes monthly ($350) deficits. Thank you for your readership and any financial support you offer. Help keep us on the net.

Vatic Personage

Joseph Stalin (1879-1953)

Joseph Stalin was half Jewish and half Russian. In 1903 he was recruited by the Russian secret police and led a double life. He was arrested 8 times; he escaped and continued his work in the Marxist/socialist movement.

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1870-1924)

Vladimir Lenin was also half Jewish and half Russian. He was a Marxists/Socialist that worked for the Jewish world leaders. He was arrested a few times and sentence to exile in Siberia where he married his Jewish wife. After he served his sentence, they lived in Germany, Belgium, England, Poland, and Switzerland before returning to Russia. He was never employed but lived a life of luxury in Europe. He was a member of the French freemasons “Art et Travai.”

Leon (Lev) Trotsky (1879-1940)

Leon Trotsky’s real name was Leiba Bronstein. He was under the training of Alexander Parvus (whose real name was Israel Gelfand) during high school. Parvus was a Russian Jewish freemason. He not only taught Trotsky in the Talmud but he also introduced him to the Kabala, Zionism and Marxism/Socialism. Trotsky became a member of the freemasons and the B’nai B’rth.

Vatic Bill of Rights

Vatic Special Quote

President Jefferson
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”
--Thomas Jefferson, 1816.
The Constitution
“The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.”

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like… if, during periods of mass arrests, … people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?

Vatic Page Views

Since March 12, 2010

"The state represents violence in a concentrated and organized form. The individual has a soul, but as the state is a soul-less machine, it can never be weaned from violence to which it owes its very existence.
~ Mahatma Mohandas Gandhi

"There comes a point when a man must refuse to answer to his leader if he is also to answer to his own conscience."
~ Hartley Shawcross (1902-2003), prosecutor at Nuremberg War Crimes tribunal

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
~ Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826)
3rd president of US, page"

Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi, one of the most influential figures in modern social and political activism, considered these traits to be the most spiritually perilous to humanity.
"Seven Social Sins
* Politics without Principle
* Wealth Without Work
* Pleasure Without Conscience
* Knowledge without Character
* Commerce without Morality
* Science without Humanity
* Worship without Sacrifice"
This is the 8th sin by Arun Gandhi.
* "Rights Without Responsibility"
~ Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi (1925)
Young India