I filed a lawsuit against Bankers to get the death benefits that was denied without a reason. That lawsuit was dismissed for defective service of process.

After my appeal failed, I refiled the case and Sarah Hurley of Turner Padget filled a motion for summary judgement using the statute of limitation defense without the benefit of discovery. I submitted argument in support of the discovery rule tolling and the judge ruled on it without the jury I had requested. In the judge's order he made an allegation that I waited over 2 years and 8 months before I filed suit against Bankers Life. This is when I realized the court was not aware of the prior court pleading I filed 2 years prior.

I asked the court to add this defective pleading to the court record, but the judge ruled that my court pleading was evidence and could not be added.

Court pleadings are not evidence because they are unverified allegations. The judge is breaking court rules to suppress facts to keep an erroneous summary judgment in place.

Reason of review: Corrupt justice system.

Monetary Loss: $50000.

Preferred solution: Offer me a decent settlement that is fair.

I didn't like:
I hate this company, I will never forgive this company.

"As a general rule, the non compliant health insurance offered by USHA, though not in line with industry, nor US Government requirements, may be an desperate alternative for some individuals..."
Read more