The False “Moral Authority” of Robert Jeffress

Betrayed Authority

Robert Jeffress—controversial evangelical megachurch pastor—and all who celebrate his claim that “God has given Trump authority to take out Kim Jong Un” have betrayed their evangelical heritage and endangered millions.

Jeffress claims that Romans 13 gives authority to Trump to do anything needed “to quell the actions of evildoers like Kim Jong Un.” And Jeffress also states that Jesus’ teaching on the Sermon on the Mount has nothing to do with how people, presidents, and countries should act.

Jeffress is wrong on both two accounts, with deadly consequences.

On Two Mountains

This week I have been touring Israel and Palestine with Interfaith Partners for Peace. A couple days ago we visited the traditional site for Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Our group discussed how these words inspired Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the great German pastor and theologian who resisted Nazi German. Bonhoeffer believed people should actually live by these words, words that speak of loving your enemies and seeking peace, words that got Bonhoeffer killed during the war.

Immediately after this we climbed Mount Bental where a United Nations observation force looks down on war-torn Syria from the an Israeli-occupied territory. Each of the villages we could see was controlled by different factions within Syria—loyalists to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian rebels, and even ISIS.

These two mountains show why Jeffress is dead wrong.

The Way of Nations

Gazing down on Syria from the Israeli-occupied territory—and thinking of all human governments in conflict—we saw ruined towns decimated by those longing to rule. And within every power struggle rulers, presidents, or dictators always follow the law of rewarding those who do good and punishing those who do evil—always according to the definitions of those in power.

Looking down from that mountain we must remember that the supposed moral authority Jeffress claims from Romans 13 is just an observation about how the world works, not how it should work. And we must remember that according to Romans 13 these governments reward and punish the people within their own borders, not the leaders of other countries. Romans 13 only speaks of the way of nations in the world.

The Way of the Gospel

But what of the way of the gospel—the gospel from which evangelicals take their name?

The way of the gospel is encapsulated in the Sermon on the Mount and its well-known Beatitudes which speaks of meekness, humility, lament, mercy, and peacemaking. This is the way of the gospel. And this is the way that evangelical pastors should be placing before their people, and before their president.

Jeffress is dead wrong to dismiss the importance of the Sermon on the Mount. It is a betrayal of the gospel.

We must not exchange the birthright of living and declaring the gospel for the porridge of advising governments on political quid pro quo. We evangelicals must not grant moral authority to President Trump to “take out” a foreign leader according to a logic inimical to the gospel. When we do, we lose the true moral authority of the gospel of peace.

Falling Rockets

As part of our trip we visited an Israeli community just north of the Gaza Strip, near the coastal city of Ashkelon. The next day a rocket was fired from Gaza, flying directly over the community I was at, landing halfway to Ashkelon. Israel naturally launched a reprisal strike. This is the way of nations.

But if rockets and reprisals fly between North Korea and the United State then untold millions could die because of Trump’s “fire and fury.”

Evangelicals must reject the false and shallow teachings of those like Jeffress. We must live and embody and strive for the peace that the gospel offers. Anything less diminishes whatever moral authority we might yet have.

Tip the Author & Support Our Ministry!

Thank you for supporting this author and Missio Alliance’s ministry of online publishing! All our authors graciously volunteer their time and expertise in creating resourceful articles such as this. Your generosity makes it possible for their voices and perspectives to reach and influence Christian leaders all around the world.

From #GivingTuesday (Nov. 27) through the end of the year, half of any donation you make will go directly to this author while the other half will support Missio Alliance and our Writing Collective platform in particular.

By commenting below, you agree to abide by the Missio Alliance Comment Policy.

Missio Alliance Comment Policy

The Missio Alliance Writing Collectives exist as a ministry of writing to resource theological practitioners for mission. From our Leading Voices to our regular Writing Team and those invited to publish with us as Community Voices, we are creating a space for thoughtful engagement of critical issues and questions facing the North American Church in God’s mission. This sort of thoughtful engagement is something that we seek to engender not only in our publishing, but in conversations that unfold as a result in the comment section of our articles.

Unfortunately, because of the relational distance introduced by online communication, “thoughtful engagement” and “comment sections” seldom go hand in hand. At the same time, censorship of comments by those who disagree with points made by authors, whose anger or limited perspective taints their words, or who simply feel the need to express their own opinion on a topic without any meaningful engagement with the article or comment in question can mask an important window into the true state of Christian discourse. As such, Missio Alliance sets forth the following suggestions for those who wish to engage in conversation around our writing:

1. Seek to understand the author’s intent.

If you disagree with something the an author said, consider framing your response as, “I hear you as saying _________. Am I understanding you correctly? If so, here’s why I disagree. _____________.

2. Seek to make your own voice heard.

We deeply desire and value the voice and perspective of our readers. However you may react to an article we publish or a fellow commenter, we encourage you to set forth that reaction is the most constructive way possible. Use your voice and perspective to move conversation forward rather than shut it down.

3. Share your story.

One of our favorite tenants is that “an enemy is someone whose story we haven’t heard.” Very often disagreements and rants are the result of people talking past rather than to one another. Everyone’s perspective is intimately bound up with their own stories – their contexts and experiences. We encourage you to couch your comments in whatever aspect of your own story might help others understand where you are coming from.

In view of those suggestions for shaping conversation on our site and in an effort to curate a hospitable space of open conversation, Missio Alliance may delete comments and/or ban users who show no regard for constructive engagement, especially those whose comments are easily construed as trolling, threatening, or abusive.