While Mitt Romney encourages the more bellicose wing of his party to temper their partisan positions, and while Speaker John Boehner tells GOP legislators to get in line and get ready to compromise, and while the GOP-elite spin machine prepares to unleash an unprecedented campaign of Hispandering in a last-ditch effort to save the party from the demographic cliff, the conservative blogosphere is buzzing with stories about voter fraud. Claims are being made that Obama's GOTV apparatus was really a sophisticated fraud designed to steal the election.

There's no doubt Democrats engaged in fraudulent actions; there've been 52 arrests so far. Heck, Democrat Rep. James Moran's son resigned over a video of him coaching voters on how to commit election fraud. The question is whether it's possible that there could have been enough fraud to swing the election. Presidential elections are decided by electoral votes, and the nature of that system makes it highly unlikely that fraud in any one district, city, region, or even state would have much of an impact on the results.

In order to pull off such a caper, one would require a sophisticated, well-funded operation capable of targeting districts in multiple states and key neighborhoods in swing states. One might need the entire vote total in some districts - like the 59 precincts in Philadelphia where Romney didn't get a single vote. Nothing helps fraud like privacy, so it might help if you can physically remove the opposition party's poll watchers, like Democrat operatives did in some Philly wards. If you can do that, you can get voter turnout to 90-95% in transient neighborhoods, by having operatives vote over and over using names of people who've moved or died and are still registered. That's how you can win a state despite losing 55 of 67 counties.

But that's just one swing state. There are other swing states, and that protects us, right? I mean, you can't commit fraud en masse and not have anyone notice, right?

In Ohio, voters were told when they went to vote that they'd already voted, and two election judges were removed for allowing unregistered voters to cast ballots. But what do you expect in a state where more than 20% of registered voters shouldn't be? There were even reports of Somalis being bused to polls to vote illegally. No wonder people are being criminally charged there.

In Florida, large amounts of illegal aliens voted, and the military members found themselves unable to vote. In Allen West's district, entire boxes of military votes were found uncounted.

Those states aren't the only ones with reports of fraud and intimidation. When you look at the areas where fraud is alleged, a pattern emerges. Key districts were targeted in swing states, and operatives did whatever they felt they needed to do to deliver those states to Obama. The sheer size and scope of the fraud is unprecedented, but then the level of media adoration for Obama is unprecedented as well. Also unprecedented are the forces that direct Obama. We know George Soros, Obama's sugar daddy, instructed him to spare no effort to engineer victory, and it looks like it's entirely possible Obama did exactly that.

It reminds me of the Seinfeld episode where Jerry won a race in middle school by getting a head start. Just like Jerry, Obama expects to get away with it, because he'll never have to race again.

Give me (or any decent programmer) an hour with a voting machine and I can get Barack “Peter Pan” Obama 16,000,000,000,000 votes. Votes don’t need to be cast to be counted. If you don’t think there is MASSIVE vote fraud, please explain “Senator” Al Franken.

who controls the software that records votes made on the voting machine? is there any way to have a conservative programmer do a check on a random sample of voting machines to see if there was any software program embedded in the machine, to change actual votes? are voting machines kept secure and tested before voting begins, and if so by whom??

i find it hard to believe that Romney garnered fewer votes than McCain? i know that Palin was on the ticket, but after 4 years of BO, i thought that most Republicans would again crawl over broken glass to get rid of BO even if Romney was not their favored nominee.

i also found it highly out of character to read that Obama had prepared a concession speech? for a man so self obsessed, i can’t imagine he ever considered losing. i think BO knew that the voting machines were rigged, and that there was no chance of an actual loss.

2 days before the election Fox news was hinting that Obama would win. Then very early election nite BO was acting like he knew Obama would win. It looks like the fix was in. The powers were not going to lose Obama care.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.