Supposedly the TRS is more resistant to breaking in the gen 5 trigger housing, but I dont know anyone who actually broke a TRS in a Glock.
Either way, I still agree with everything said here. Nothing worth upgrading if youre comfortable on a gen 3.

They said the same thing to me about a two months ago regarding mag springs. They asked for my address, I sent it, they asked for it again, I sent it, a month and a follow up email later...... nothing.

Well, after 3 weeks of not sending a round downrange I shot a club match on Saturday, 5 stages + classy. 3rd match in CO, 6th match this year/ever.
My allergies were freaking out and were super distracting, but it ended up being one of the best matches ive shot to date. I was listening to Steve Anderson on my way there and I unintentionally embraced the "think about nothing during your run" technique.
Everything felt good, runs were smooth, stage plans worked, gun ran great.
Came in 24th out of 87, 3 positions behind my class leader. (Paper A)
2nd in Carry Optics with a few division stage wins.
I feel like my movement is so sluggish, but its definitely improving.

Thats definitely interesting. I thought the CAT was the one to go for now. Its definitely the most popular at our ranges.
This one:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01ITAKG6A/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_U_Tvc8CbGE72CA0

I need some more range time to make a decision on the load. Ive ran 124s since I started a year ago, and subjectively I see little difference between them and the 147s.
I know that its mostly technique and timing, I was asking more if it was worth it running the 147s at the edge of spring weights that I can use.
With the 11lb spring and double diamond tungsten rod/adapter, I fail the vertical lockup test with my DPP and 4.5# striker spring.
Do you have an optic?

USPSA Carry Optics
min PF loaded 147s wont cycle on a 15# spring let alone the factory 17#
Edit, I completely overlooked the other thread in this forum. I was more asking if it made sense to stick with 124gr loads since I dont have as many spring options with the 147s.

I wonder if anyone has tried "goop" Its this very sticky, flexible adhesive that kinda pulls off like those 3M command hooks. I use it on plastic and all kinds of other things, but its fairly easy to remove, clean and dries clear.

Im currently testing a few different loads from different commercial reloaders to see what works best for me. Im split between 124gr and 147gr.
As I test things around with double taps and double tap timing I keep thinking that 124gr is the way to go.
On my Gen 5 with a DPP and a TTI spring kit, a 13# ISMI spring is as light as im comfortable going for reliable lockup. That cycles the 124s and 147s fine and gives me pretty good timing with double taps. The 124s will cycle with a 15#, but the 147s will not. Im wondering if its worth sticking with the 147s for no perceivable reduction in recoil and less tuning headroom for recoil springs.
Im just curious what everyone else does here with their glock setups. Especially gen 5s with a slideride optic.

I honestly contemplated soldering mine on one side.
Imo that button/contact design isnt built for longevity because at least 3 of the legs need to be floating for the switch to work. Im curious to see what the new board revision looks like that "supposedly" fixes the button and dead DPP issues. Heard that was in the final testing phase at Leupold.

I was pretty impressed with the inner milling of the slide on my Gen 5. They did some neat stuff to keep the weight down but structural integrity high.
Depending on what you want or plan to do, the TTI springs make the trigger REALLY nice. The TTI/stock (-) connector isnt bad if you like a rolling break, Ive settled on the dot connector for my preferred trigger feel with more of a wall.