Barcelona Exopolitics Summit: The Reasons for no official government disclosure being possible

This doesnt seem to have been posted on ATS. At least I couldnt find it. So if a thread already exists about this, its my mistake and a moderator can
choose to close the thread or let it run anyway.

Its about a very interesting panel discussion moderated by Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy (Project Camelot). Its from Barcelona Exopolitics Summit in
2009. They are discussing some very good reasons for why there is no official disclosure and why there wont be one.

I will not sum up the reasons here. Its better if you watch these videos and take part of the discussion. There are many different opinions and all
are pretty much valid from the speakers specific point of view.

After watching this, I would like to know if you agree with their reasons and if you still believe its possible that the government will do the
disclosure at some point in time, and how they will manage it without getting lynched.

The Exo team are unlikely to have any influence on the possibilities of 'disclosure.' They essentially represent the lunatic fringe of
ufology.

It's easy to start accusing them all of being crazy or fraudulent, but I've come to suspect that some of them are sincere in their beliefs. In a
way, they have the innocent beliefs shared by the 50s contactee movements.

So why are the Exo team considered lunatic fringe? A large part of the reason is how they can spend hours discussing the relationships between
Governments, shadow governments, good aliens and bad aliens. They're arguing over how many 'aliens' can dance on the head of a pin...when they
don't actually know if there is a pin.

Example...

According to Dr. Wolf, several confederations of extraterrestrial civilizations are visiting us in loosely-coordinated fashion. These are: the
Alliance (of human-looking ETs from the Altair Aquila system), the Corporate (of Greys from the Zeta Reticuli system), the Federation of Worlds (of
unspecified races from many star systems), and the United Races of Orion (cultures from those star systems). Further, the Alliance is in affiliation
with the Corporate and with the Federation of Worlds. The United Races of Orion are in affiliation with the Corporate, and, through them, with the
Alliance and the Federation of Worlds.

Team Exo have no proof or evidence to back up anything they say. Nada. So how can they generate so much fanciful debate about something that's
essentially as much a fantasy as a TV show? When they try to bring evidence they cite Clifford Stone (fantasist), Bob Dean (BS con-artist), Sgt Wolf
(lying hoaxer) and Source A (stolen valour, liar, hoaxer). They provide images that are already identified or known hoaxes. Earlier in the year, they
released a photo of a man in shorts and polo-shirt and identified him as an alien.

On top of this apparent chaos, they offer 'Certificates in Galactic Diplomacy'
and 'Certificates in Exopolitics!' Copernicus, I don't want this to seem like a thread derailer...it's not my intention at all. It's more like a
heads up to how far out there these guys are.

I can tell you didnt watch the videos though because they are not about the beliefs put forward by the Exopolitics web site. The guy behind the site
is a member of the panel. Just like you have politicians on TV who's beliefs you may not agree with, there is going to be people you dont trust in
these videos as well. That is not a good reason to disregard the messages put forward by the other people in the conference.

I hope that people who read this take part of this information and do not disregard it based on your opinion. If they want to agree with you after
watching the video, thats fine.

People have to stop listening to what others think and start thinking and taking part of information themselves. Why? Because its their gut
feeling, not yours, that have to decide weather or not they believe, and what parts they believe, in this information.

All information goes through a persons perception filter. Thats why its important for everybody to run it through their own filter, and not
someone elses. This is about every person out there making his own decision. Its not about everybody agreeing.

And Dr Steven Greer claimed in Barcelona that he would have a G8 country Disclose if the US did not heed his word. LOL the audacity im all for it but
really? Some foreign nation is going to bend over backwards for a ER doctor? These countries follow whatever the US PTB say. Not going to happen IMO.

I can tell you didnt watch the videos though because they are not about the beliefs put forward by the Exopolitics web site.

Plus I don't have 3 hours to donate to listening to Team Exo and I couldn't get the first video to play past the intro. I'd usually skim or watch a
video linked in an OP.

Perhaps you'd be gracious enough to provide 3 or 4 of their reasons? A lot of ATSers can't watch video...for the time being that includes me. At
least you'd be enabling more people to partake in a discussion. On the other hand, I'm under the impression that very few people take the Exo folk
very seriously and might not choose to post.

Originally posted by Kandinsky
Plus I don't have 3 hours to donate to listening to Team Exo and I couldn't get the first video to play past the intro. I'd usually skim or watch a
video linked in an OP.

If you cant put 3 hours into this, you cant be very interested in it.

Originally posted by Kandinsky
Perhaps you'd be gracious enough to provide 3 or 4 of their reasons? A lot of ATSers can't watch video...for the time being that includes me. At
least you'd be enabling more people to partake in a discussion. On the other hand, I'm under the impression that very few people take the Exo folk
very seriously and might not choose to post.

Anyone who watches this video will be able to give you that information, and if you seem to be genuinely interested in it based on their perception of
you, Im sure they will.

And as for what others will think of this.... it shouldnt be of any importance to you personally unless you base your own opinions based on what
others think of it?

Honestly Copernicus, it would take me 12 days to watch a three hour movie. A half hour movie on the internet gets me FAP'ped on my internet for 24
hours, so every other day I could watch half an hours worth ~IF~ I could actually bypass the parts I've already seen.

Can you give the pertinent points to the video? Not everyone is blessed with quality high speed.

No, you need to watch it so the original message is not affected by the messenger (me). If I pick out things from the 3 hours, it will be my selection
of it and not the original message anymore. You need the entire context.

If you really want to watch these videos, surely there are friends who have working internet connections so you can get it from them on a usb stick or
whatever? It doesnt seem to be a unsolvable problem.

I have never seen a forum thread where the OP refused to discuss their own content. It's absurd.

Your complaints that the UFO forum 'lacks progress' is kinda undermined by this thread. You pull up a video from last year and refuse to explain its
contents. Rather than improving 'progress,' you've actively stalled it. The irony of this is classic.

I have not seen the movies yet because my workplace has some major slow connection, but I have a theory (and it seems logical at least to me

) on
why there is no disclosure.

The reason is simple , they can't , well they could but then some major bad things would happen . I did a thread on that in my early days on ATS if
somebody wants to look it up , but in short , imagine a situation in which aliens are not so benevolent as we think they are , they use us like a big
social/genetic experiment , but they let us live in "peace" , until their testing environment gets disturbed with the knowledge of them.

After that , well its time to "reset" the lab conditions and put fresh monkeys in

I have never seen a forum thread where the OP refused to discuss their own content. It's absurd.

Your complaints that the UFO forum 'lacks progress' is kinda undermined by this thread. You pull up a video from last year and refuse to explain its
contents. Rather than improving 'progress,' you've actively stalled it. The irony of this is classic.

Why should I explain its contents to you? Its a video for you to watch if you want to. Obviously you have passed on it because you were not
interested.

What is ironic here is that you are claiming I am stalling your progress when you are the one who choose to not watch the video.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.