Archive for the ‘Twitter’ Tag

My favorite online forum, where I’ve been a member for over a year, yesterday offered me the chance to revise my username. The original pick I made was not helpful in SEO terms, so I happily decided to take up their offer. But what to change it to? My actual business name, Virtual Writing & Communications, seemed too long and difficult for a username.

It was a useful exercise, one that reminded me how useful it is to bravely strip down to essentials. Rather than padding, setting up fluffy barricades to protect your identity and meaning, the trick is to chisel down to the core and then surface with a simple, naked, unadorned truth.

(If you Twitter often and well, you can appreciate the power of brevity. If you’re a poet, you know real poetry is stark, not ‘flowery’ at all.)

So my username has become plainly, ‘virtual writing.’ And of course, I can’t just accept that, but have to consider the precise meaning of those words. We have fiction and non-fiction writing, we have journalistic, poetic, and prose styles. And now we have this new form of writing that’s called ‘virtual writing.’

What distinguishes this new form? We can infer that the ‘virtual’ qualifier at least points to the internet, and probably involves product delivered digitally. Further, I’d like to suggest that virtual writing is writing tailored to the speed and engagement level of the internet; to the ‘scanning’ behavior of most people when they browse; to the necessity of SEO; and to a global audience of anyone (as opposed to a much smaller audience of those who choose to purchase your writing.)

So that takes care of the virtual part, but what about the writing part? The internet is about writing in a very big way, resulting in huge numbers of bloggers and online writers who are trying to get their message out, but are seriously compromised by their sub-standard writing skills. We plunge into the opportunities of the internet without solid practice in this skill, and many a post includes misspellings, poor grammar and rhetoric, obvious total lack of proofreading, and other written communication failures.

Does it matter? If most can decipher your meaning even if the writing is terrible, who cares? I think it really doesn’t matter much at first. The reader is there for your message, after all, and if it can be gleaned from the morass, fine. But in the long run, the quality of your writing is a major influence on your reputation. A reader may get a kick out of your post, but will not remain devoted for long if your writing’s not accurate and rich.

I’m passionate about writing, it’s true. Words are objects of great beauty to me. The internet, also, has captured an enormous part of my attention. So I’m happy with this new moniker: ‘virtual writing’ is me!

When I first heard the term, social media, I dismissed it as a trivial amusement for those who have lots of extra time. Heck, when I first encountered computers, I avoided them as representing a new challenge, and life was challenging enough, thank you very much. Certainly, when I heard about Twitter, I just couldn’t understand why I’d want to share the messy details of life with the world. I’ve never been one for chattering, and these tools all seemed to encourage a lot of hot air for no more than shallow entertainment.

Of course, I was completely wrong about all these. The computer is now my mainstay, Twitter is a depth less source of learning. And social media is emerging as not only a great way to communicate about business, but also as a major aid to the changes we must make as a society, or perish in the attempt.

Social media is about word of mouth. It’s also about establishing individual brand. While we used to present a resume and hope that communicates our essence, now we can present online all the various aspects of our brand. Knowledge and understanding of any one individual can now far surpass the colorless lists on pretty linen resume paper.

The reason why word of mouth is such a big deal is that it really works. No recommendation is stronger than the opinion of trusted friends. Under the old print paradigm, those opinions meant only a tiny slice of your market. But with the global power of the internet, word of mouth has become the arbiter of nearly everything.

The reason why all this fascinates and uplifts me is that I see it as a return to self knowledge and open awareness. As a baby boomer, I’ve always bemoaned the lack of deep self knowledge in the adult world, and worked to tickle the soft underbelly that Pema Chodron always talks about. With the internet and social media, we are forced to consider where exactly each of us fits in the humongous puzzle. Without the direction, confidence, and passion of a personal brand, internet ramblings can be fun but useless.

But with a thoughtfully prepared plan, a detailed idea of brand, and generosity, social media now symbolizes our new world, where authenticity and helpfulness reign, where exchange is possible with anyone anywhere, and where we can find the niche that perfectly suits and nurtures us.

I’m a newbie at Twitter, having signed up just a couple weeks ago. Touching in on it just now and then, I certainly haven’t wrapped my little brain all the way around as of yet; but I can say that it’s phenomenal in the extreme.

I follow, so far, a variety of types: cohorts in the VA industry, as well as thought leaders of the highest calibre. The tweets on my home page range from “taking the kids to school” to unabashed company promotions, to quotes from geniuses.

It’s the combination of business proclaimations, stimulating ideas, and superficial banter that’s confusing. Many posts invite responses, so conversations of a sort do take place. But it seems to cater more to the lone voice, regularly tossing out impressions to the world at large, hoping a few will resonate with your tone and contact you for business or other profitable projects.

It’s like a global billboard – an electronic one that changes constantly. You’re looking for ‘followers’ on Twitter, which is a very different thing from ‘friends.’ Of course, a great many Tweetpeeps are not leaders, and their tweets don’t offer much to their followers, beyond recognition of the tweeter’s copasetic personality. Which is important, but not very deep, not endlessly fascinating.

How does Twitter help your business? If you are passionately engaged in what you’re doing, and have a persistent interest in all aspects of your field, it’s clear that Twittering will connect you to kindred souls and daily feed you stimulations. I do wonder, though, about the efficacy of Twitter for those who lack this focus. There’s little of value in their comments. Perhaps Twitter is a tool they can use to deepen their commitments and focus their interests.

In sum, I think Twitter’s a serious business tool, and really not a ‘social medium.’ It’s evidence that businesses must now include free sharing on a grand scale, and that we succeed best through cooperation, rather than competition in today’s world. It forces us to consider the whole of our lives as dedicated to new discoveries; and to study the meaning of our work, 24/7, including its impacts on all aspects of our lives, and a continuing intensive study of how our actions and products affect others.

The internet and today’s technologies are a fascinating study, especially for one not bred on cyberspace. I’ve spent the past six months almost continuously online, attempting to get a grip on commerce represented there, studying social networks and forums and internet marketing techniques. One thing that strikes me in this investigation is how carefully you have to preserve your identity and purpose amidst all the noise. It’s very easy for the internet to become the dictator. You originally approached it as a tool for your business and if you don’t keep it in that place, it can quickly become a mere distraction and little real help.

Content is King, you read everywhere. But there’s little to no instruction about creating great Content; the directives all pertain to SEO, marketing techniques and strategies, or the latest widgets. A large percent of the material online makes fabulous use of these systems without first ensuring valuable Content. In this way, the internet is far more sophisticated than its users and often produces the cyber equivalent of kids playing with guns.

The two social media sites, Squidoo and Twitter, exemplify this distinction. At Squidoo, you share specific information designed to edify your readers. At Twitter, you fatuously inform the world that you’re on the way to the airport, eating a hot dog, or coping with the sniffles. Never having been much of a gossip, small talk, or chatter type, I have a horror of people ‘following me’ and have no interest in sharing the twists and turns of my everyday with anyone except my lover. My point is that Twitter caters to the glitz and sensationalism with hardly a nod to Content; while Squidoo’s Content is an amazing tribute to the learning and creativity of 21st century human beings.

It takes a while to understand the differences between the popular sites, and it takes inner strength to avoid being sucked in by sites that seem promising but actually offer only shallow solutions for you. Depending on your purposes, Twitter may be just the thing you need (to keep track of a team’s progress, for instance). By keeping your focus firmly on your real-world demands, you can separate the noise of internet hype from authentic and useful Content.