In the aftermath of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s resounding victory in Tuesday’s elections, senior Obama Administration officials have stated the United States may pull its long-standing support for Israel at the United Nations.

The two issues that have worsened the already-strained relationship between President Barack Obama and Netanyahu are the Israeli Prime Minister’s opposition to a nuclear deal with Iran, which the U.S. is currently negotiating, and Netanyahu’s promise, during the campaign, that there would never be a separate Palestinian state on his watch. He has since walked back that declaration, saying he wants a “a sustainable, peaceful two-state solution.”

Netanyahu explained the reasons for his opposition to a nuclear deal Iran in his address before a joint session of Congress earlier this month. He reminded the members that Iran has a long history of not being a trustworthy negotiating partner and sponsoring violent acts against the United States and its interests. He went on to state that any deal that leaves the regime’s nuclear infrastructure in place “will not prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons; it will all but guarantee it gets nuclear weapons — lots of them.”

Advertisement - story continues below

Related Stories

A “two state solution” has been at the center of the United States’ effort to broker a peace between the Israelis and Palestinians over multiple administrations. Following the Oslo Agreement in 1993, the Palestinians gained a degree of self-rule over large portions of the West Bank and the entire Gaza strip, though still falling under the ultimate governing authority of Israel. In 2005, Israel disengaged from the Gaza Strip and removed settlements from the territory. Israel gained control of both areas during the Six Day War in 1967.

Netanyahu has stated on multiple occasions that he could never support returning to the pre-1967 borders because they are “indefensible.”

In December 2014, a resolution before the U.N. Security Council calling for an imposed two state solution, using the pre-1967 borders as a template, failed to pass by one vote. The eight of the nine votes needed for the measure to pass came from Russia, China, France, Argentina, Chad, Chile, Jordan, and Luxembourg. The United Kingdom, Lithuania, Nigeria, the Republic of Korea, and Rwanda abstained. Only the US and Australia stood directly with Israel and voted against the measure.

Advertisement - story continues below

The United States, a permanent member of the Security Council, also indicated it would have vetoed the resolution if it had passed. Any of the five permanent members of the Security Council has the right to veto any measure brought before the body. The United States’ U.N. Ambassador, Samantha Power, at the time of the vote stated: “We voted against this resolution not because we are comfortable with the status quo. We voted against it because… peace must come from hard compromises that occur at the negotiating table.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki raised the possibility in a briefing Wednesday that the United States’ position at the Security Council could change: “The prime minister’s recent statements call into question his commitment to a two-state solution,” Psaki told reporters. “We’re not going to prejudge what we would do if there was a U.N. action.”

Secretary of State John Kerry, who is reported to be one of Netanyahu’s only true friends in the Obama Administration, called Wednesday to congratulate him after his Likud Party’s victory. So far, President Obama has not.

Update: President Obama called Prime Minister Netanyahu Thursday afternoon and congratulated him, but also told the prime minister that the United States is reassessing its options regarding the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.