It's either 10.3 or Ubuntu 7.10. I'm leaning towards the latter, but if I could test-drive 10.3 without much fuss that'd be a plus.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Use To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. - To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Feeling multicore elation? Remember this correlation: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..

10.1 was just plain a bad release, which was a result of some developers having too much say in the release process and adding alpha-level software into the build, while pretending the work was release candidate quality. Novell was never able to repair 10.1 properly--and their reputation suffered as well. Hopefully the humiliation they went through at the hands of the Linux community made them learn to avoid repeating that behavior. I suspect this is the reason they took their time releasing 10.3--10 months for a minor release is a long time. They only took 6 months between 9.3 and 10.0, which was a major release (and a good one).