On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> > >
> > > Why is it not possible to formulate s.t. like "If selectors are used
> > > in a language which incooperates the namespace mechanisms, the
> > > following binding rules apply: ..."?
> >
> > Because the rules might vary.
> >
> > If this does not satisfy you, please let us know.
>
> The i18n core working group is not satisfied with your reply. We see a
> problem with definition of conformance. Please define conformance with
> respect to the binding mechanism. This is different from prescribing it
> to all implementations.
I'm not sure I understand. Could you expand on what you mean by
"conformance with respect to the binding mechanism"?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'