If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Okay just because you say so socialized medicine is now conservative, boy was Reagen wrong!
Thanks for setting us straight.

Come on Rock, he said no such thing. He said that Romney is largely overall conservative. It's just like the bullshit with McCain. One of the strongest fiscal conservatives out there, but most people consider him a dem because they don't like a couple of issues with him.

Bachmanns double speak on this gay marriage thing has irked me a bit. In the last debate she clearly said she would not get in the way of a State from making the decision about gay marriage, and now she's railing on about how she'd try to make a Constitutional Amendment barring it nation wide.

Make your mind up.

In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.

McCain and Romney hold a lot of conservative (adjective) positions, but they are not conservatives (noun). They lack the overarching philosophical framework that puts their conservative ideas into a coherent whole. Thus, while they are on the conservative side of many issues, they are capable of making liberals very happy when they stray into areas where they lack that framework.

Bachmann, OTOH, is a conservative. And, with her strong showing in the polls, the momentum seems to be going her way. Romney is the establishment candidate. Bachmann is the activist/grassroots candidate. If it's a tight race between the two of them, then eventually, the other conservative candidates will end up supporting her as they drop out, while the establishment guys go to Romney. That means that she picks up Cain's delegates, Santorum's and Pawlenty's. Romney will pick up Huntsman's and Newt's.

Than we have an Obama that has a free pass from both sides.
Compare their accomplishments and don't forget Romney is also for cap and trade.

SO you are saying you would sit home and let the Dims win?

If you remember what I said in another thread, I would vote for Bozo the Clown if he won our party ticket.

I want that dumb-ass gone more then any thing. I would love a true conservative as our party ticket, but in the end, I really just want Obama gone. This country cant take another 4 years of Obama/Reid/Pelosi/Holder and the rest of his corrupt cronies.

Ya. That's where he currently is measured on the political compass.....as he stands or says he stands on issues during an election period

When are people going to listen to what politicians say and remember WHAT they actually do? I'm not talking the last year or two...I'm talking historical philosophy. You are too smart to be bafooned by this charlatan.

wishes to control "weapons of unusual leathality"....which amounts to gun control

Romneycare

"Blowin' in the wind" should be this guys campaign theme

Originally Posted by Apocalypse

SO you are saying you would sit home and let the Dims win?

.

What would be the difference again?

Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound - Unknown

I am suggesting the possibility that GotNews.com might be a hoax or troll site making @#$% up. I based that comment on the PJMedia article I linked, whose description and quotes from the killer's FB...