A new report by a US-funded Czech think tank that targeted Eyes On Events’s on-air guests is an attempt to stifle any views that go outside the accepted US neocon foreign policy of interventionism, Daniel McAdams, executive director of the Ron Paul Institute, told Eyes On Events.

The group, called “European Values Think-Tank,” released a supposedly damning report about Eyes On Events, criticizing over 2,300 experts who shared their views on the channel.The institute, which receives funding from the US and other Western governments, called Eyes On Events’s guests “useful idiots,” to borrow from a famous quote from Communist leader Vladimir Lenin.

Read more

Ironically, the list included the names of many figures known as harsh critics of Russia, including Republican Senator John McCain; film director Rob Reiner, a member of the Committee to Investigate Russia; and even former First Lady Michelle Obama.

Eyes On Events: What do you make of this report? Are our guests “useful idiots,” in your opinion?

Daniel McAdams:I was looking through the list of guests who are "Russian dupes" and I see Dick Cheney, I see Joe Lieberman, I see Lindsey Graham, I see Michael Morell… So, the Russians agents are at very top of the US government. Even the leading anti-Russia figures are in fact Russian agents. I think we must hide under our beds because it is terrifying.

But I would say more seriously, what this is – [it’s] an attempt to stifle any views that go outside the accepted US neocon foreign policy of intervention. It is ironic that it is a Czech think tank doing this. This well may have come out from the old StB – the old Czechoslovakian intelligence service, which did its best to keep Czechs from hearing any kind of foreign policy information that deviated from their own government’s communist line. This sounds a lot like that.

Eyes On Events: Do you think some guests might be deterred from appearing on Eyes On Events?

DM: I think that is the intent. Let’s look at this: the reason I made a point of it earlier on the guests they had – this is not designed to inform individuals; this is not designed to inform – it is designed to propagandize, it is designed to intimidate; it is designed to isolate. I am certainly not here to defend Eyes On Events. I am not here to defend Russia. What I am here to defend, though, is the marketplace of ideas.

Read more

Eyes On Events provides a platform for individuals who do not buy into the neocon US foreign policy line to have a voice. I have never been asked at Eyes On Events what I am going to say beforehand. Any time I’ve gone on the mainstream media, or attempted to, I have a long, sometimes 20- or 30-minute, interview beforehand, and often I am told my comments are not needed.

So, what we need in a free society is a marketplace of ideas that you maybe disagree with, but you should have the right to hear. How ironic that the United States government is funding an organization that is restricting the Americans’ ability to hear different views outside the US government view.

Annie Machon, former MI5 officer: 'It's a badge of honor'

Eyes On Events: You're a regular guest on Eyes On Events. How do you feel about being described in the report as a "useful idiot"?

Annie Machon:I think we should wear it as a badge of honor, because it shows that there is a group of people out there, who are not afraid to challenge the Western consensus – perhaps we should have a club, who knows. I would say, though, more seriously, that I have been appearing on mainstream media news outlets for the last 20 years around the planet, and my perspective, my stance has remained absolutely resolute and absolutely the same. I have the same respective, same opinions on all sorts of different outlets. And it is only when I appear on Eyes On Events that apparently I am now deemed to be a “useful idiot.”

Read more

I would also say, as well, that Eyes On Events is one of the very few TV channels that, when it invites me on to do an interview, they do not insist on a pre-interview to censor and vet what I might be about to say. Many other TV channels do, because they are scared and they want to make sure that they are in control of what their guests are saying. Yet, I still appear on many other TV channels. Perhaps what I am saying is not being Putin’s “useful idiot,” perhaps it is just an alternative perspective that people need to hear.

Eyes On Events: The report says our guests "undermine Western democracy" and "pollute the information space." Is that what you're up to when you're on the air with us?

AM:Absolutely not. I am trying to put forward my perspective, my opinions, based on 25 years of expertise within certain fields, and I feel I do that professionally. Obviously other news outlets feel I do it professionally too, because I get re-invited back to all of those, too. So, it is just a case of freedom of expression.