We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).

Our website cookie policy has been developed to help inform you what cookies are used on this site and how to manage them. For more information visit our Cookies Policy page.

A cookie is a small file of information that is sent to your computer or mobile phone from a website so that the website can recognise your device if you return. Cookies cannot be used to identify you personally.

These pieces of information are used to improve our online services for you through, for example:

enabling our site to recognise your device so you don't have to give the same information several times during one task

recognising that you may already have given a username and password so you don't need to do it for every web page

measuring how many people are using different aspects of our online service, so we can make them easier to use and there’s enough capacity to ensure they’re fast

For information how to control and delete cookies plus complete information on our cookies uses on this site, please visit our Cookies Policy page.

ASA Adjudication on Ryanair Ltd

Ryanair Ltd

Dublin AirportCounty DublinIreland

Date:

19 September 2012

Media:

National press

Sector:

Holidays and travel

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A12-188015

Ad

A national press ad, for an airline, viewed on 10 February 2012, was headed "MALMÖ WITH RYANAIR from £14.99 one way". Text within the footnote stated "Book until midnight 13.02.12. Travel days: Mon-Thurs. Travel in Apr. Subject to availability. Terms and conditions apply, see Ryanair.com for details. Fares exclude optional fees/charges. Flights from London (Stansted)".

Issue

The complainant challenged whether the price was misleading, because they understood that customers paying with a non-Ryanair credit or debit card would be charged an additional fee and the only way to avoid the charge was to pay with a Ryanair payment card, which consumers had to pay for.

CAP Code (Edition 12)

Response

Ryanair said the advertised fare was available to all consumers who chose to avoid optional fees and charges and said the footnote made that clear. They said that, depending on their country of residence, consumers could avoid paying the booking fee by making payment using MasterCard Prepaid or Ryanair's Cash Passport card.

Ryanair said the initial cost of the Cash Passport was £6, but that that was immediately redeemable against the cost of the first flight purchased using the card. They said the only restriction on the card was that it was to be used within the first six months of issue and confirmed that at the time of their response there had been 100% uptake of the discount voucher.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA noted the footnote stated that the advertised fare excluded "optional fees/charges". We also noted that the additional fee could be avoided by those in possession of the Cash Passport, which we understood was a prepaid card that incurred an initial cost of £6 that was redeemable against the cost of the first flight purchased using the card. However, we noted that consumers who were not in possession of the Cash Passport, at the point of purchase, could not immediately purchase tickets for the advertised price; rather they needed to apply for the card and await delivery. We were therefore concerned that that delay may result in consumers being unable to obtain the advertised price.

We also understood that in order to use the Cash Passport, consumers were required to load the card with a minimum of £150 and that additional charges applied to its use. We considered such details to be material information which the consumer needed in order to make an informed decision about the advertised price.

Because the surcharge was not avoidable at the point of purchase, unless a consumer was already in possession of the Cash Passport, and because, in order to obtain the advertised price, consumers were required to pay using the Cash Passport, which was subject to significant conditions that the ad did not make clear we concluded that the ad breached the Code.