==================The radical DEMS are wasting so much time on this Mueller report. They are taking over the job of the DOJ instead of doing their own. They have abandoned their own jobs of serving the people, rather wasting our tax money in the pursuit of their political ambitions of corruptions.

The Mueller Report to DOJ was supposed to be final. DOJ wrote the summary. Congress got the copy. Congress has 99% of the Mueller report. They could not have the 100% due to legal constraints of the classified issue.

DOJ Bar has the legal rights not to release all the Mueller Report. It is the law. Pelosi's big mouth assaulted DOJ to be put to prison. Pelosi is the one to be in the Big House. DOJ Barr, followed the law to the last letter.

Shame on the radical DEMS. Now, they are all nervous of the on going honorable Barr investigation of the FISA WARRANT AND THE FAKE DOSSIER.

Brennan and Comey are now throwing each other's blame. Both are in big trouble, along with all the participants. DEMS only option is demanding DOJ Barr to resign. That is not going to happen. DOJ Barr is so brilliant and brave to face all of them.

May God always be with you Honorable Barr. You are brilliant and brave. I am proud and happy for you.

================Aloud? We are not in the grade school. We know everything already. DEMS wasting time, and money of the taxpayers. They better return to work. They have so much work to do for the people, but abandonedand focus on their corruptions and fraudulent schemes.

================Aloud? We are not in the grade school. We know everything already. DEMS wasting time, and money of the taxpayers. They better return to work. They have so much work to do for the people, but abandonedand focus on their corruptions and fraudulent schemes.

Get rid of all of them on Nov. 2020. Clean them up please. Thank you.

Yes,aloud and its going to take all day tomorrow...And its only going to be Rats that sre going to read is..So you know its going to be Dramatic reading,by Drama Queens and Kings...

If I give James Comey the benefit of the doubt(a constitutional precedence and a constitutional rule under the 5th Amendment), are we the American Public to believe that the FBI knew or didn't know that they were being played by the Russians in their misinformation campaign?

How about this question: Since four independent investigations have said that Trump is not guilty of conspiracy with the russians to influence the election, are we as sovereign Americans to believe, that the FBI investigated contrary to the constitution?

I, a Trump Supporter, and a MAGA believer, supported the Mueller investigation. However, I supported an investigator who follows the rules. Apparently, Mueller, the FBI, and the CIA community did not. Which I hope is not the case, but it appears that he did not follow the rules. And here is how:

The Obama administration commissioned in a way, an investigation on a competing party running for president. The administration conducted surveillance on the Trump campaign based upon evidence that turned out to be false. This is part of the misinformation campaign of Russia. All four investigations found that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election. Now the constitution is clear about investigations. Through the Bill of Rights, the burden of proof of an accusation is on the accuser. In this case, the FBI, CIA, Congressional investigations of both the House and the Senate, have to come up with evidence to prosecute the accused. In this particular case that is the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.

If I was a law enforcement officer such as the FBI are, and I was investigating murder, and this murder required a surveillance of the subjects under accusation, then I need a warrant to conduct such a surveillance act. If such a surveillance is required, the accuser must by the constitution establish guidelines to protect the rights of the accused, but unearth evidence required for prosecution. If such evidence is found, I as the investigator must then indict the accused by the evidence uncovered by the surveillance. If this is not done, I can then be accused of entrapment or even abuse of power and office.

A special warrant is required when the accused is involved with foreign operatives. This warrant is known as a FISA warrant. This warrant also requires a limited scope of surveillance. Four times the Steele dossier was used in four FISA warrant hearings, the warrant was granted. The Steele dossier was never verified and it has been found that the dossier is false. Russian misinformation succeeded. Now the Democrats have leverage to hold the soon to be president responsible for collusion that never occured. This violated the constitution and the full bill of Rights.

Unlike the congressional investigations, the FBI and the Mueller report did not investigate in accordance with the constitution's philosophy of "innocent until proven guilty" but rather "guilty until proven innocent". Thus, Trump has to prove his innocence because the prosecutor cannot decide whether to indict or not indict. However the prosecutor is working for the Attorney General who says there is not enough evidence to prosecute. But the report says they "cannot exonerate either". Constitutionally it is not the job of the investigator but rather the court to exonerate. Therefore the report that assumes that the accused is guilty, unconstitutionally included into the report a double negative based upon the presumption that the accused is guilty. This is a major violation of the Constitution, specifically the fourth and fifth amendment.

Finally I will ask this question: Since the Steele Dossier is unverified, and unreliable, therefore false; and since it was this document that started the investigation, and this document is full of misinformation; and the Mueller Investigation using the Misinformation to gain warrants against the campaign; so I ask, what legal standing does Bob Mueller, the FBI under Comey have in court?

If there is no standing, then the surveillance has no predicate, with no predicate then the surveillance is spying. And since it has been revealed that spying had occurred, are we the American people satisfied with the actions of the Obama administration for spying on a political opposition candidate. And if so, each and every time the American voter speaks against the party in power by electing outside that party, the party in power can then spread misinformation against the party that is opposition?

Three times in American history this has happened. Hamilton vs the election of Jefferson under John Adams administration. Which ended in a duel between Burr and Hamilton. Buchanan and Lincoln which ded in the Civil War. And now Obama with the 2016 Donald Trump election.