Vote for one of the entitlement princesses in the poll below. Remember you are voting for the biggest entitlement princess, not necessarily the most evil woman or the most violent woman or the most insane woman or the biggest whore.

Who is your vote for the August 2015 Entitlement Princess Of The Month?

Like this:

Related

6 Responses to “August 2015 Entitlement Princess Of The Month”

You need more candidates and better candidates. The picks are too easy and thus no fun. The first one has as little entitlement in it as Alanis Morisette’s ironic song has irony in it.

The second is more interesting, because despite getting tens of millions of dollars, the $65m is still a “fair” case as it’s only 1% of the man’s fortune. So that’s more of a case of how absurdly rich some people have become.
If that percentage was the price for all alimonies, no sane man would still complain about it being too costly.

But she apparently wants to run a medium-sized company and have her husband pay for every expense for the rest of his life.

Brandi-Lee is a scammer running a scam. I don’t see that there’s a sense of entitlement, of “I deserve this” there. She’s no more an entitlement princess than a car thief who just happens to be female.

Anne is simply a normal, standard alimony-grabber. The only notable thing about her is that there’s a couple of extra zeros on the end because rich people are rich. She probably actually does spend two grand a month for stationery – billionaires just run on a different economy.

This month’s a no-brainer. Brandi isn’t really entitled, she’s just a scumbag. Dias-Griffin, on the other hand, is a clear-cut example of female entitlement. So what if she married a billionaire -it appears that she contributed NOTHING to building his business and his fortunes, so why the hell should she be entitled to any of the fruits of his labours? The answer is that she shouldn’t, outside of (reasonable) child support payments. I’ll give Mr Griffin credit where it’s due, there’s something admirable about getting a woman to agree to getting only 1% of your fortune in the event of a divorce.