Disclaimer: the posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Friday, March 04, 2011

HAPPY LIBYANS, DUTCH MARINES, ERIC PRINCE, ISRAEL

Libya under the European fascists.

On 4 March, Gaddafi's government gave foreign journalists a tour of part of Libya.

"Villages erupted in jubilation as the convoy passed through areas of western Libya, with crowds of flag-waving supporters whistling and shouting 'God, Muammar, Libya, together'.

11 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Maybe I'm just imagining it, but there's been a shift in tone over the last few days in UK coverage. The BBC seemed at great pains to describe problems on the Libya/Tunisia border as a 'logistical crisis' rather than a 'humanitarian crisis' - in fact they made this distinction themselves. There's also a weird and confusing dynamic building up between the US and UK governments. The US seemed to be pushing for a no fly zone and Cameron was dragging his heels. When Cameron began to back the proposal the US suddenly says it has no plans given the issues of legality (quote: a no fly zone would mean intitial/preemptive strikes at Libyan air forces.

Are they attempting to guage the mood of the public and the media prior to committing themselves?

This looks far from being a well conceived coup. Even the rebels themselves look like something out of Waiting For Godot. What do they want exactly? The want the regime in but Gadaffi out? How is that progress? It's the kind of approach students have: it seems they just want to score somekind, any kind of win - anything that will help them feel less disenfranchised. Just to have their force of will registered. It was the same in Egypt - and once their demands are met and their general feelings of political and ideological inadequacy are alleviated - they realise that they have made no real progress at all.

A set of tangible objectives outside of feeling 'bummed' might help.

Assange and his retards seem to have prepared the way for a climate of 'broad spectrum' dissatisfaction - a climate in which any specific objective seems little more than an afterthought.

Out of chaos comes even more chaos. But then that's nature's bum deal.

Citizens of oil producing nations must see more benefit from their country's national resources, billionaire investor George Soros has told the BBC.

Revolts in Libya were partly the result of "revulsion against a corruption" fed by the misuse of oil money, he added.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12643419

*****

Love him or loathe him - I think this is something most decent readers can support. His motives may be less than altruistic but the objective is credible at least. Although I fail to see how the average brit has benefitted from any of our major industries and resources in the past. It's hardly been a profit share. Investors like Soros and no shortage of banks might enjoy the more even handed distribution of corrupt wealth though.

I wonder how often he requests his valet to have all that sheeps clothing dry-cleaned?

It is a little funny though...If the "Europeans" were so bad for Libyans and they liked only to exploit the land, then why the last 60 years so many thousands of Libyans try to live to the "evil european" lands? I do not think that you would like to go and live with people who destroyed your land. So, stop the hypocrisy. Maybe the europeans were indeed evil, maybe they killed many but they were the only connection of the country with progress. Why is Libya rich (in oil) and the people poor? I do not think it is the fault of the Italians who left the country 60-70 years ago.

We don't have to believe what the media says but since the media are perhaps the most single powerful channel these people use to manipulate opinion it makes sense to keep track of any shifts in tone. If these people are your enemy then what advantage does it serve in ignoring them? Forewarned is forearmed? That's what smart is.