Yeah hellrider...and strat...I saw this album at a second hand record store around 1992ish....and they wanted $900.00 bucks for it because there were some scruffs on the corners of the album,and may had a few more marks on it and it was not sealed! For an unopened album in mint condition all the way around would be about 5 "thousand" bucks! Freaking crazy!

I am not a huge fan of "The Beatles" but they have my "respect" as pioneers of traditional rock and roll.

This contraversial cover art for the Yesterday And Today album spun the heads of uptight individuals from back in the day!!

I'm not going to give you an opinion on "the worst Beatle" here....but I am going to post this album photo here.

[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, June 26, 2009 5:37:10 PM

The Beatles Yesterday And Today original album cover 1966!

I am not a huge fan of "The Beatles" but they have my "respect" as pioneers of traditional rock and roll.

This contraversial cover art for the Yesterday And Today album spun the heads of uptight individuals from back in the day!!

I'm not going to give you an opinion on "the worst Beatle" here....but I am going to post this album photo here.

[_strat_] Friday, June 26, 2009 4:46:27 PM

Caveman? Well... He does look like one. His nose is so big, you could use one nostril as an apartment, and the other as the garage... I havent seen that movie, tho.

I did see A hard days night. He was ok in that one... Although Pauls grandfather was the star of it, imo.

IDK, for me Ringo was always that weird guy in the back playing the drums. Nothing against him, but no reason to love him in particular either... Besides, I think Pete Best was the best Beatles drummer...[Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Friday, June 26, 2009 9:13:47 AM)

guidogodoy wrote:

You leaving Ringo off for some reason? Oh wait...he did the movie "Caveman"

"zug zug Lana!"

_strat_ wrote:

My pick for the worst Beatle - Paul. No contest here. Ive always been a big Lennon fan, and I like a lot of Harrisons stuff too.

IMO, it was after the Beatles that it really showed who was the best musician. John made great music, so did Harrison. Paul never did anything good on his own, and what he did, I cant help but to think that he was always playing the Former Beatle card in his solo career.

[british.steel] Friday, June 26, 2009 10:13:45 AM

Ron, same here. never have been, and never will be a beatles fan. i rerspect what they did for music, but to me their music is not good.

[guidogodoy] Friday, June 26, 2009 9:13:47 AM

You leaving Ringo off for some reason? Oh wait...he did the movie "Caveman"

My pick for the worst Beatle - Paul. No contest here. Ive always been a big Lennon fan, and I like a lot of Harrisons stuff too.

IMO, it was after the Beatles that it really showed who was the best musician. John made great music, so did Harrison. Paul never did anything good on his own, and what he did, I cant help but to think that he was always playing the Former Beatle card in his solo career.

My pick for the worst Beatle - Paul. No contest here. Ive always been a big Lennon fan, and I like a lot of Harrisons stuff too.

IMO, it was after the Beatles that it really showed who was the best musician. John made great music, so did Harrison. Paul never did anything good on his own, and what he did, I cant help but to think that he was always playing the Former Beatle card in his solo career.

I really don't have a worst Beatle--I liked The Beatles as a whole I liked Paul McCartney & Wings
My favorite Beatle song is "Something In The Way She Moves "--which was written by George Harrison
And John Lennnon solo was amazing--"Woman " & "Imagine "
I even liked Ringo--he made me laugh--he was in a movie back in the 80's with I believe John Matusak from the Oakland Raiders but I can't for the life of me think of the name--
So I can't pick a worse Beatle--they all had their moments