Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:23:36 +0800
> timf <timf at iinet.net.au> wrote:
>>>> Invisible whitespaces! Grrr!
>>>> Happens all the time :)
>> "make whitespace" clears it.
>>>>timf at ubuntu:~/1/try2$ diff -upr v4l-dvb v4l-dvb-tim > tim.patch
>>timf at ubuntu:~/1/try2$ cd v4l-dvb-tim
>>timf at ubuntu:~/1/try2/v4l-dvb-tim$ make checkpatch
>> make -C /home/timf/1/try2/v4l-dvb-tim/v4l checkpatch
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/timf/1/try2/v4l-dvb-tim/v4l'
>> scripts/check.pl -c
>> # WARNING: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/scripts/checkpatch.pl version
>> 0.12 is
>> # older than scripts/checkpatch.pl --no-tree version 0.16.
>> # Using in-tree one.
>> #
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/timf/1/try2/v4l-dvb-tim/v4l'
>>timf at ubuntu:~/1/try2/v4l-dvb-tim$
>>>> My confidence is shot to pieces, you realise!
>>>> Attached - tim.patch
>>>> Please, please work!
>>>> Worked ;)
>> Patch applied, thanks.
>> Now, all we need to do is to make tda1004x more stable. The weird thing is that
> it works fine with my Intel based notebook. It just fails on my dual core AMD,
> with a higher clock. I suspect that this is due to a timeout issue, but not
> 100% sure.
>>> Cheers,
> Mauro
>>Fantastic!
I have an old box which I'm pretty sure has a cpu about 1.6, non-dual core.
Tomorrow, (too much noise at this hour of night here!) I will try
either/or Kworld 210, Pinnacle 310i, Kworld 220.
I will try both current v4l-dvb and that patch of yours in
tda10046x.c, and see what happens.
Is it worth trying different msleep values?
All I can think of is this is a relatively recent event with this
"revision FF" business,
but I can't be exact as to how long ago I noticed it.
Regards,
Timf