The Associated Press is reporting that civil war looms
in Iraq as bombings tear across the country. Is this disaster really a result
of a failed foreign policy or is it a deliberate plan to initiate a policy
of ethnic cleansing that will finally allow the Globalists to capture and
dominate Iraq as they never could before?

The agenda to maintain division and ethnic tension
in Iraq can be seen as long term plan and the only way to finally capture
and enslave a country that has historically thrown out its occupiers on
every occasion.

In 1982, Oded
Yinon, an official from the Israeli Foreign Affairs office,
wrote: "To dissolve Iraq is even more important for us than dissolving
Syria. In the short term, it's Iraqi power that constitutes the greatest
threat to Israel. The Iran-Iraq war tore Iraq apart and provoked its downfall.
All manner of inter-Arab conflict help us and accelerate our goal of breaking
up Iraq into small, diverse pieces."

Ethnic cleansing, maimed children and thousands of
dead American soldiers are a small price to pay because for the Globalists
the end always justifies the means and untold bloodshed and misery and bloodshed
won't stand in their way.

Such a strategy, aimed at marginalizing the Sunni resistance,
the group that always spearheads opposition to occupation in Iraq, has also
been triumphed by such luminaries at Council on Foreign Relations member
and New York Times editor Leslie Gelb.

So if the plan is to keep the different sects at each
others' throats then who benefits from the chaos created by the endless
bombings? It is a myth that Sunni and Shia factions in Iraq violently despise
each other's very existence. Most co-exist peacefully and only fringe elements
are interested in stoking tension, this according to Dahr
Jamail, an unembedded journalists living in and reporting from
Iraq.

Jamail agrees that it is inconceivable that Sunni or
Shia factions would even consider attacking religious shrines like Samarra's
Golden Mosque. Iran has blamed the US and Israel for the attack and former
CIA analyst and presidential advisor Ray
McGovern concurs that they would have had the motive.
Previous examples shed light on the plausible identity of the perpetrators.

In September 2005, British SAS were caught
attempting to stage a terror attack by disguising themselves
as Arabs and attacking Iraqi police. The soldiers were arrested and taken
to a nearby jail where they were confronted and interrogated by an Iraqi
judge.

The initial demand from the puppet authorities that
the soldiers be released was rejected by the Basra government. At that point
tanks were sent in to 'rescue' the terrorists and the 'liberated' Iraqis
started to riot, firebombing and pelting stones at the vehicles injuring
British troops.

The only news outlet to ask any serious questions was
Australian TV news which according
to one viewer gave, "credibility to the 'conspiracy theorists'
who have long claimed many terrorist acts in Iraq are, in fact, being initiated
and carried out by US, British and Israeli forces."

The consequences of this strategy of tension are obviously
hideous for Iraqis and their future generations but they also come home
to roost for Westerners. As a result of the disaster in Iraq, the sullied
reputation of the United States has collapsed and its government is increasingly
seen as out of control and illegitimate. While on the surface this is true
it is also by design because it opens the door for a Globalist form of world
dictatorship to step in and 'rescue' the American people from its tyrannical
government.

The end game is the complete destruction of US sovereignty.

Meet the new boss, worse than the old boss.

Get Alex Jones
and Paul Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's documentary films, films
by other authors, audio interviews and special reports. Sign up at Prison
Planet.tv - CLICK
HERE.