Albany Catholic

Where religion and politics meet
in New York's Capital Region . . . and beyond.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Vacation time

We at Albany Catholic are taking a few weeks off to rest and relax. If you would like us to keep posting when we return, please send an e-mail to AlbanyCatholicBlog@yahoo.com and let us know how you feel. If there are no messages when we get back, we will know it is time to move on to other endeavors.

Monday, July 02, 2007

Remember Egil Krogh?

Egil Krogh, sentenced to prison for his role ion the Watergate scandal, is the author of the forthcoming “Integrity: Good People, Bad Choices and Life Lessons From the White House.” He wrote in The New York Times about the need for integrity in government.

The Watergate break-in, described by Ron Ziegler, then the White House press secretary, as a “third-rate burglary,” passes its 35th anniversary this month. The common public perception is that Watergate was the principal cause of President Nixon’s downfall. In fact, the seminal cause was a first-rate criminal conspiracy and break-in almost 10 months earlier that led inexorably to Watergate and its subsequent cover-up.

. . At no time did I or anyone else there question whether the operation was necessary, legal or moral. Convinced that we were responding legitimately to a national security crisis, we focused instead on the operational details: who would do what, when and where. . . .The premise of our action was the strongly held view within certain precincts of the White House that the president and those functioning on his behalf could carry out illegal acts with impunity if they were convinced that the nation’s security demanded it. As President Nixon himself said to David Frost during an interview six years later, “When the president does it, that means it is not illegal.” To this day the implications of this statement are staggering.. . .I finally realized that what had gone wrong in the Nixon White House was a meltdown in personal integrity. Without it, we failed to understand the constitutional limits on presidential power and comply with statutory law.

In early 2001, after President Bush was inaugurated, I sent the new White House staff a memo explaining the importance of never losing their personal integrity. In a section addressed specifically to the White House lawyers, I said that integrity required them to constantly ask, is it legal? And I recommended that they rely on well-established legal precedent and not some hazy, loose notion of what phrases like “national security” and “commander in chief” could be tortured into meaning. I wonder if they received my message.