Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Monday, June 15, 2015

Jeb Bush the Clueless and Single Mothers

Jeb Bush may be trying hard to distance himself from his idiot brother, but he is quickly reminding us that he is just as out of touch with the reality of the lives of most Americans as was/is the Chimperator. Moreover, he is out of touch with just how poorly America stacks up compared to other developed countries when it comes to child welfare and well being. Bush brought all of this into focus while traveling in Europe where he condemned single mothers and said that children needed fathers and mothers to thrive where child welfare exceeds that of the America. Perhaps Bush was pandering to the Christofascists, but the statement was as obtuse as when Mitt Romney praised Israel's health care system without grasping that it was a nationalized health system - something Romney was campaigning against. Here are highlights from a New York Times column on the issue:

Last
week, Jeb Bush was asked to answer for a passage from his book from two
decades ago, “Profiles in Character,” in a chapter titled “The
Restoration of Shame,” in which he blamed the “irresponsible conduct” of
births to unmarried women on a flagging sense of community ridicule and
shaming.

Bush
responded, according to MSNBC: “My views have evolved over time, but my
views about the importance of dads being involved in the lives of
children hasn’t changed at all. In fact, since 1995 … this book was a
book about cultural indicators [and] the country has moved in the wrong
direction. We have a 40-plus percent out-of-wedlock birth rate.”

He
continued: “It’s a huge challenge for single moms to raise children in
the world that we’re in today and it hurts the prospects, it limits the
possibilities of young people being able to live lives of purpose and
meaning.”

“It’s important to keep in mind that just because a woman has a
nonmarital birth, that does not necessarily mean that the mother is
‘going it alone.’ For instance, in the U.S., more than half of births
that occur outside of marriage are to women who are cohabiting.”

That same Pew report reported that 17 European countries (Iceland,
Slovenia, Bulgaria, France, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Britain, the
Netherlands, Portugal, Latvia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Austria,
Finland and yes, Estonia) have higher birthrates to unmarried women than
does the United States.

And according to a 2013 Unicef report,
“Child Well-Being in Rich Countries,” all those countries except Latvia
(Bulgaria was not included) had higher ratings of overall children’s
material well-being (a measure of things like child poverty rates; child
deprivation of things like three meals, including some with protein and
fresh fruit and vegetables; books; regular leisure activities; some new
clothes and properly fitting shoes; and whether the family owned an
automobile, traveled for vacations, had a computer and had a separate
bedroom for the child).

In
addition to material well-being, almost all of them outranked the
United States in children’s health and safety, education, behaviors and
risks, and housing and environment.

We
spend quite a bit of energy blaming births to unmarried women for our
woes, but that is only part of the picture. The other part is the way we
as a society treat those women and the fathers of their children.
Instead of endless efforts to sanctify marriage, the emphasis should be
on finding ways to support children and encourage more parental
engagement from both parents, regardless of marital status. This
includes removing all barriers and penalties for people, especially the
poor, to cohabitate.

First, we should seek to reduce the level of unintended pregnancies in this country. As the Guttmacher Institute pointed out in February,
about half of pregnancies here are unintended, and “unintended
pregnancy rates are highest among poor and low-income women, women aged
18–24, cohabiting women and minority women.”

Second, we have to examine how we have used the law as an instrument to
push unwed fathers out of homes, particularly poor ones, rather than
encourage them to stay.

Maybe a deficit of shame is not our problem, but rather a deficit of
common sense in advancing policy and promoting co-parenting.

Sadly, once a child is born and is no longer a fetus, the concern of the Christofascists and the Republican Party disappears and programs that would aid child well being are slashed, insurance programs cut, and children, especially those of the poor are treated as disposable garbage. The callousness and hypocrisy is truly breath taking. Jeb Bush is another clueless, out of touch plutocrat. We do not need him holding any public office.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

PLU Top Gay Blogs

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.