If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

For my own private thoughts, I rate how the 1st and 2nd picks of each draft in terms of contribution and strength of position. Those picks are the ones that should be gold. After that I try to measure contribution vs. starting vs. strength of position.

Scale:

1 - Very good (started most of his career, contributed greatly to the team, strong at his position)
2 - Good (as above but may not have had majority of starts (dominant bench players, STers, etc ...)).
3 - Average (solid but did not exceed expectations)
4 - Below Average (contributed but failed to meet expectations and did not have longevity at position)
5 - Poor (ended up being roster filler and moved on or away from football)

I guess it all depends on the equation used. I've seen some others try their hand at metrics using player accomplishments, player snaps and longevity and team retention where the Giants almost always rank top 5.