Saturday, September 8, 2012

If Gandhi and Nehru were not
representatives of the Hindus, why did they assume power in truncated India?

Gandhi and Nehru did not say
publicly even once in their whole life, that they were representatives of the
Hindus. One of the serious charge against them is. “What right had they to
assume powers to rule Truncated India, which was meant to be homeland for the
Hindus, even as per statements of Jinnah. If they had any moral courage, they
should have told the Viceroy that they did not represent the Hindus, and power
should be handed over to the representatives of the Hindus.

Even the British government
transferred power to Nehru and the Congress under the impression that they
represented Hindus. In December 1946, when Baldev Singh along with Nehru and
Jinnah went to London, they were mentioned by the British press as
representatives of the Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs (the Tribune dated 27-1-1948).
It is clear that Nehru went there as a representative of Hindus, but he never
preformed his duties towards Hindus. This shows that when they attended the
meetings with the British govt. or with Mr. Jinnah, they behaved, posed as
representatives of the Hindus only to get hold of the share of the Hindus, but
betrayed them later. Their followers should explain this misconduct of their
leaders.