18 ministry is actually explained two lines above. The Ministry of Defence

19 of the Republic of Serbia is mentioned.

20 MR. MARCUSSEN: And, Your Honours, the next document 1174.

21 Q. Mr. Theunens, is this another example you use in your reports to

22 illustrate requests from local TOs to the War Staff for the provision of

23 men and -- and -- and weapons? These two things are mentioned, I think.

24 A. Indeed your -- Your Honours this addresses then the situation

25 Odzak and Derventa, which is in northern Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Page 3949

1 MR. MARCUSSEN: And again, Your Honours, rushing a bit through

2 these documents, they're discussing -- I'm sorry.

3 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Yes. It's very good. Just one

4 small question that comes to mind.

5 This request, which is intended to for the defence of this

6 village, this request is addressed to the Serbian Radical Party. Is this

7 request addressed to the Serbian Radical Party, Witness?

8 THE WITNESS: Indeed, Your Honours, because it's -- it's mentioned

9 in the --

10 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] All right.

11 THE WITNESS: The top left of the document, I mean, the

12 addressees under the --

13 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well. Have you checked

14 whether these Crisis Staffs in this locality did not also send this type

15 of request to other parties? Did they not do this and to send their

16 request to all and other political parties and not --

17 THE WITNESS: [Overlapping speakers]

18 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] The Serbian Radical Party.

19 THE WITNESS: [Previous translation continues] ... carried out

20 research to find out also whether actually volunteers were sent, so

21 whether this request was fulfilled, but I have not come across such

22 documents. They may have exist but we don't have them. But at least it

23 shows that the members of the Crisis Staff believe that the SRS War Staff

24 is in a position to assist them.

25 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well. So maybe it would be

Page 3950

1 better to ask for the tendering of documents now and resume tomorrow.

2 It's as you like, Mr. Marcussen. You can ask for the exhibit numbers

3 right now or you may have forgotten in the meantime.

4 MR. MARCUSSEN: Nope, you are right, Your Honour, I might have

5 forgotten tomorrow so it is probably a prudent thing to ask for the

6 admission of the documents we have just discussed with the witness; so

7 again I ask under seal, and I think we have noted the accused's objection

8 on this but request under seal the admission of 65 ter numbers 733, 790,

9 and 1174. Oh --

10 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well. The Trial Chamber --

11 MR. MARCUSSEN: Excuse me. It should have been -- it should not

12 have been 733, it should have been 737.

13 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well.

14 Mr. Seselj has raised a general objection. This has been recorded

15 on the transcript. Registrar, can we have some numbers, please.

16 THE REGISTRAR: Your Honours, 65 ter number 737 will be Exhibit

17 number P239; 65 ter number 790 will be Exhibit number 240; and 65 ter

18 number 1174 will be Exhibit number P241, all provisionally under seal.

19 JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Thank you, Registrar.

20 As you know, we shall begin tomorrow at 9.00. It is usually at

21 8.30 that we start but anyway, since nobody else is in the courtroom, we

22 can start tomorrow at 9.00. I hope that the examination-in-chief will be

23 concluded tomorrow. We shall try to make sure that we hold our tongues

24 and don't ask too many questions, because I think you have approximately

25 two hours left, and then we might be able to begin with the

Page 3951

1 cross-examination. The cross-examination will also take place during the

2 rest of the week. So anyway, we shall meet again tomorrow at 9.00.

3 --- Whereupon the hearing adjourned at 5.34 p.m.,

4 to be reconvened on Thursday, the 21st day

5 of February, 2008, at 9.00 a.m.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

* The bold and italicised text was previously confidential pursuant to a redaction order of the Chamber. The status of this redaction order has been changed from confidential to public per Chamber's decision of 24 April 2008.

* The bold and italicised text was previously confidential pursuant to a redaction order of the Chamber. The status of this redaction order has been changed from confidential to public per Chamber's decision of 24 April 2008.