Both projects are, naturally, named after the 2009 movie Avatar. Itskov also hopes to eventually transcend the physical and have human consciousness exist within holograms. “Holograms give plenty of advantages,” he said, according to the International Business Times, “You can walk through walls, move at the speed of light. Remember in ‘Star Wars’, Obi-Wan’s hologram? That was pretty amazing.”

Obi-Wan’s ghost. His ghost.

He was dead.

The Immortality Conundrum

Here’s the problem with “transferring” your consciousness, and it’s the same problem faced when dealing with teleportation and cloning (for immortality): As far as data is concerned, nothing is ever actually transferred.

It’s copied.

While we may someday be able to preserve an individual’s consciousness, to store their memories and personality within a computer program, the result will only ever be a copy.

The original person will still experience death. Unless we could find a way to integrate the brain itself into a computer, anything dealing with a copy will ultimately be pointless.

For the person being copied, anyway.

Of course, if the idea is to preserve an individual’s personality just to have it around, without any pretense of “immortality,” I suppose it’d be somewhat valuable. It’d be interesting to still have a backup of Albert Einstein around, for example. But it would never be the real him.

We’re slowly entering into this strange realm of science, where what it means to be human will be questioned. If this Russian entrepreneur is successful, or if such a breakthrough ever does occur, we’ll be faced with a lot of existential quandaries.

Not the least of which is: If your entire state of being can be recomposed into a bunch of 1s and 0s, what are you, really?

One Reply to “Would You Upload Your Mind Into A Computer?”

I’ve always theorized that, should it become possible, the only real solution to this dilemma would be to ease into it… connect it directly to the mind in realtime and ease it in so first a quarter of the mind is replicated on the computer while 3/4 are in the physical brain, then half and half, then 3/4 in the computer, then entirely in the simulation. This might require disabling the physical synapses as the process continues, however, to make certain that the brain is relying on the computer as a part of itself, for lack of a better term. Certainly a topic worth discussing.

Love the website, by the way. My new homepage. I’ve been obsessively combing through the archives, as you can see!