Longtime crow killer, Dick Mermon, is quoted: "When I
started, they made a fool of me." That's hardly surprising, since
tree stands make fools of hunters - witness all of the hunters who fall
out of
them every hunting season. Crows, unlike hunters, are near the top of
the animal intelligence scale.

Mayor DeStefano is considering pulling up trees and
allowing a crow hunt, "to fight the mess, the noise, and the smell." While
I would not want to get close enough to hunters to assess their smell,
any town infested with hunters can attest to the noise and mess they
leave
behind - Budweiser cans, lead pellets, and McDonald's wrappers. Hunters
also leave visible markers of the suffering they cause - blood and body
parts
from mutilated animals, and crippled animals, who will die slow, agonizing
deaths.

Your article states, as a given, that crows are "pests"
and that they "plague" communities. The negative way in which
we view animals reveals OUR shortcomings, not theirs.

Mermon wrote a book called, "Crow Shooting Secrets." The
impetus for Mermon's literary classic was that crows' vocalizing had
ruined his recreational killing of other animals, when he was but a depraved
youth.
For their communication skills, the crows deserve to be honored, not
killed.

Predictably, hunters use the West Nile virus as a
justification for the slaughter. Seeing crows alive and well, however, is a
good indication that the virus is not in the area. The Centers for Disease
Control states that over130 species of birds (and less frequently, several
mammal species) are known to have been infected with the West Nile virus. In
areas where the virus is circulating, very few mosquitoes are infected with
the virus; even if the mosquito is infected, less than 1% of people who get
bitten and become infected will get severely ill. The CDC further states
that there is no evidence that a person can get the virus from handling live
or dead infected birds.

The bodies of crows killed by hunters (not West Nile), and
not immediately retrieved, can later hamper efforts to link dead crows in an
area with possible West Nile contamination.

While crows do not kill people, hunters do. Hunters
routinely kill themselves, other hunters, and innocent members of the public
(in their own homes, yards, and cars).

Your article ends by stating, "There is good news. winter
crows usually leave in March" [if only the same could be said of
hunters].But they'll be back." Of course they will be back. The object
of hunting is never to reduce animal numbers, but to intentionally increase
their numbers, through hunting and habitat manipulation, and then to
demonize them, so that there will always be more live targets and an
invented excuse to keep maiming and killing them.