How is a coin with less resources, smaller team, better off in the long term?? 23 core team members plus some community contributions doesn't compete against coins that for instance raised $4b dollars and already has their protocol out there. And even if this rare case that Ark had this revolutionary tech don't you all think other projects would have taken that code into their own protocol? I haven't heard anyone copying Ark so far, it's open source after all isn't it?

Also I'm a big believer in that they do not even come close to competing with Academic people that bring a mathematical approach to the space. If you look in the history math always wins, the stock market is a prime example of that.

Good stuff for debate. You have to consider the fact that ark is not well known yet. But the community is strong. I believe ark has a good chance of survival. They have a steady team, but they can allways grow their numbers the more exposure they get. So you do have a point but it doesn't mean if they don't have a big team or whatever today that it will be that same way tomorrow. Thanks for commenting

I followed the rules. I have a pretty "large" following in the crypto space so if only 1% votes for example I have a decent amount of votes. It's gonggrabber's contest so it's his rules. He's awesome for creating this contest, and check the ark price :D It spiked up. Also ALL videos are awesome!