Bont Eastlake

Canada can follow in the steps of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia, Iran etc. All significantly poorer countries not due to their own faults yet still thrive while having no diplomatic relations with Israel. If Pakistan can go decades without recognizing Israel, surely Canada with it’s economic might, political stability and military prowess would have zero problems dealing with any issues by cutting ties to Israel.

Canada has no excuse in continuing to maintain relationships with Israel, while claiming to be a moral country that respects human rights and the international law.

That’s the Israelis problem to deal with. They want Jerusalem, Galilee, the West Bank…they need to stay up late at night and do the math on what it would take to buy them. If Palestinians are not selling, Israel need to figure out why.

The average Palestinians have little interest in entangling themselves in the political games being played by the Zionists and their allies. They can’t force Israel to accept the truth, only force Israel to pay the price of taking their land. Even if it means to go to prison, get shot, or massacred wholesale. That’s the price I suppose. How much is a 30 year jail term in prison worth in monetary terms? How much is a life cut short worth? What’s the price for genocide?

Good call on the similarities of arguments, perhaps fallacious ones, decrying the pointlessness of rebelling against injustice. I couldn’t help it considering the path I see countries are moving toward these days, where life is becoming increasingly degrading and states are directly or indirectly demanding the common citizen to prove their worth of existing before offering firm representation and support.

Nation states were imposed on South Africa and other land as a tool of subjugation and exerting the powers of the rulers over everything and everyone on it. Apartheid South Africa did it at the expense of black South Africans. Israel is doing the same to Israelis, at the expense of Palestinians, because no populace would willingly subject themselves to be ruled over and be subjugated without considerable privileges in return.

By compromising into becoming part of the state, Palestinian stand to lose all of their good will and political righteousness and will find themselves in worse situation than they are in now. Nation state cannot exist without oppression, and Palestinians do not need oppressive to thrive.

Okay, this is still regressive approach. South Africa was the first country to overthrow apartheid, but first doesn’t mean correct. Today, the country is still hopelessly poor, with extreme levels of social and economical inequality, high crime rate, worsening gender relations and of course, soul crushing corruption levels. All of this legitimized by purported independence and self-determination. Atleast when people suffered during the apartheid the enemy was clear and the causes was true. Now South Africans still suffer but nobody knows why for sure and whos the enemy. Its an acceptable suffering now, that’s for sure.

The nation state was the victor along with the banking institutions that finances it. The same faceless, formless entity that represents Israel, America, Australia and pretty much every country in the world right now.

Palestine should not emulate south Africa. Don’t fall for the same trap the they fell into. Let Israel continue their systems of apartheid, but force them to pay for the privilege. Make the price as high as the pain it causes them. Don’t give up your identity as a people for a concept of a nation state thats designed to disenfranchise you.

Same tactic of shade blindness used by Anglo-Saxon American ruling class in order to bulk up the white nationalist government, by stimulating huge inflow of immigrants from poorer European countries like Italy, Greece, Cuba etc. Making them all feel welcomed and united with the fake white identity against a hostile mass of black and brown domestic threats.

Nation states are opportunistic political development designed to facilitate maximum growth of capitalist infrastructure and operations. The measurable benefit of nation states are not silly ideas like self determination but the absolute power of the capitalist class over society, and in turn over nature.

Ethnic groups do not have the right of self determination in nation states. In fact members of any ethnic group are subject to annoying and possibly harsh and inhumane laws just for existing in the state. The state hold ultimate power over its citizens, and the capitalists direct the running of the state.

Are white Australian not occupying a landmass that was already inhabited by the native aborigines? Through the collective organisation known as the government of Australia? Are the native aborigines forced to yield to the laws and orders from this government else risk violent state retribution through the police or army?

Are white New Zealanders not occupying the landmass already inhabited by the native Maoris? Are the Maoris not forced to yield to the laws and orders they never signed up for, in their own homeland?

Are whites not occupying the landmass of Turtle Island through the white supremacist governments of the USA and Canada. Land that were already inhabited by multitude of nations of native Americans for thousands of years. Are the natives not subject to the oppressive laws and orders from the government that happily massacred their ancestors?

All the while, their ancestral homelands of the UK, Ireland, Germany or France…these are all sovereign nations. These countries havent been swallowed by the Earth or drowned by the sea. Which means white people still have their homeland they can return to.

Maoris, the Australian aboriginals, the Native Hawaiians, the various Native American tribes and nations have no other homeland. Think about that.

The point is, Clinton managed to remain in office for the entirety of his two lengthy terms, despite his predatory proclivities. This is an office supposedly most scrutinized by the public, the media and the businesses.

The mere act of touching a woman against her will is considered assault, both in America and pretty much all over the world. Thats the most basic moral standard of any society. To respect women as the other half of humanity, without whom no society no matter how small and simple or how big and complex, can survive.

I mean, if the nation failed to call the highest office into being accountable to the most fundamental measure of morality, what use is having a nation? What use is America? Even cavemen lived by rules pertaining to the welfare of every member of their society.

No. But if you do give into your lower impulses, what can a woman do to protect herself? She can’t do anything because the differences in physical strength. That knowledge alone is a potential motivator for rape.