According to the summary,
the impact on veterinarians will be severe because:

Veterinary qualifications
require 5-7 years of university training.

Veterinary courses are
expensive to deliver with significant laboratory, technological, clinical and
live animal inputs.

Veterinarians have lower
earning potential than other similar professions with a starting salary of
$47,330 and average total income of $77 ,000 (201-12 tax return data).
Veterinary remuneration compares unfavourably with graduates of similarly-priced
courses – for example average total income for medical GPs in 201-12 was $149,000
and for dentists was $147,000.

Veterinary schools are
already underfunded and this was acknowledged in the report of the Review of
the Demand-Driven Funding System.

Veterinary students are
predominantly females (around 80-90%) who often reduce their employment while
looking after children. The new arrangement will severely disadvantage these
women.

As the course requires a
large amount of face-to-face class time and clinical placements, veterinary
students find it extremely difficult to maintain any reasonable casual
employment to help fund their education.

The AVA is calling for a
moratorium on fee increases to Commonwealth supported places for veterinary
students.

Given all of this talk
about the veterinary workforce, I was surprised to note that the American Veterinary Medical Association has released this online comic book to highlight the joys of being a veterinarian.

As loyal SAT readers will know, some of us love superheroes. Wonder Woman and the Phantom are important fashion icons. But the admiration goes so far. I wouldn't take their career advice.
So is this portrayal of vets perpetuating some problematic ideals?

For
example, none of the superhero vets had to charge for their services, present complicated options to clients, discuss bizarre test results or negotiate consent, nor did
they deal with any workplace stress, and the outcomes were all fantastic. They
were available the moment their clients called, got definitive diagnostics
rapidly, had recently developed drugs immediately at their disposal, accessed
any resources they needed etc. There were no post mortems or deaths.

It seems to me there is a
major gulf between what people THINK being a vet is going to be like and what
it IS like, and selling the superhero fiction is – I would argue – a tad
irresponsible (This “fantasy” element is alluded to in one of my favourite tee-shirts
of all time - check it here).

Don’t get me wrong, I love
being a vet – but not for the reasons portrayed in the comic. It’s a bit like
what shows such as CSI have done to misrepresent forensics: suggesting that
every crime can be solved rapidly with you-beaut forensics by glamourous
detectives. And when we are talking about a profession with a) a massive rate
of attrition and b) a very high suicide rate, we need to take these gaps
between reality and perception pretty seriously.

I think the AVMA are trying to point out the diverse, important and life-saving roles of veterinarians - none of which I would deny. I'm just not sure the superhero metaphor is helpful in this case.

(And on a lighter note, I
would qualify that this post was written by someone who spent a substantial
proportion of this year dressed as a superhero for a fundraising exercise, and
I can say categorically that being dressing like a superhero and being a vet
should never be combined. Those things don’t protect you from paws and claws. Walking around in one of those suits is also breathtakingly awkward. You want to be feeling fairly confident when everyone else is in jeans and tee-shirts and you're rocking a colourful leotard).

Veterinary Ethics: Navigating Tough Cases

WARNING

All images and content on this site are copyright Anne Fawcett unless stated otherwise and should not be reproduced without written permission. Please be aware that some surgical and clinical images are used on this site.