Chris,
We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to re-publish the CCXML-IR in a short term.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider implicitly accepted the resolution. If you need clarification, please ask them very soon.
Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan
ISSUE-690:
Proposed Resolution: Accept
Your comment is valid, but the assertion #852 is not aligned with CCXML 1.0 specification. So the resolution is to remove this assertion from the IR.
=================================
Chris:
This is ISSUE-690
RJ
---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800
Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit
June 21st - June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel
Register today for your All Access Pass:
http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer
On Apr 27, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Chris Davis wrote:

Correction: the test case # is 852, not 882
Chris Davis wrote:

Hello www-voice,
Test #882 seems to test that a conference ID is a legal URI.
It uses a cryptic value passed to "match":
---------
if (confid.match(/^([A-Za-z]:\/\/(.*\/)+)?(\w)+$/) != undefined )
------------------------
I ran some sample URIs from RFC2396 through the same "match" usage
as the test case and am told URIs are not URIs.
Examples that it claims are not URIs:
ftp://ftp.is.co.za/rfc/rfc1808.txthttp://www.math.uio.no/faq/compression-faq/part1.html
<html>
<body>
<pre>
<script type="text/javascript">
var confid = 'ftp://ftp.is.co.za/rfc/rfc1808.txt';
if (confid.match(/^([A-Za-z]:\/\/(.*\/)+)?(\w)+$/) != undefined )
{
document.write( confid + ' is a URI' );
}
else
{
document.write( confid + ' is NOT a URI' );
}
</script>
</pre>
</body>
</html>
This is part of 10_5_5_A.txml.
Thanks