While the judge acknowledged in his decision that "there is also evidence that alcohol was used by candidates on both sides, to influence the outcome," he made no findings with regard to the allegation.

The judge considered arguments that the incumbent chief Poker was involved with some of the decisions that precipitated the unfair election, and should be denied relief by the courts as a result. But Rennie rejected those claims.

"There is an overarching public interest in ensuring that band confidence in band elections is merited, as it strengthens band governance," the judge noted. "In consequence, given the importance of the electoral process, relief will not be withheld."