Below is a link to known posts from last weekend's 2010 Wine Bloggers Conference. The list has been compiled from various links sent on Twitter, Google alerts, searches, and the like. I have attempted to capture as many as possible. However, I am sure the list is quite far from complete. My apologies in advance to anyone I missed. Feel free to leave comments with links to additional posts.

Please note that some of these posts relate to Washington wine while others are specific to the event itself. Enjoy!

Hey everyone, do you think blog posts about #WBC appeal to anyone but other wine bloggers? So much of the conference was about breaking out of the circle and appealing to non-wine bloggers. Is posting about the conference helping or hurting us if we are trying to appeal to other demographics?

SWG, always great spending time with you. Good question on how broad the appeal of the WBC posts will be. They are an interesting mix of topics and things, some with more broad appeal and some with less. Interested to hear what people think.

Josh, feel free to grab any of the links for your post. Let me know when you have your post up and I will add a link to your post at the bottom of this one. Keeping rocking the wine blogging world.

I think the appeal of WBC posts really depends on the type of post. Admittedly, a lot of the "What I learned" lists won't appeal to the wider audience, but the write-ups on what we experienced while we were in Washington probably tend to be of more general interest. I've seen some really great posts on the pre and post conference trips. I'm hoping to do some posts that more specifically deal with the wineries and places that I visited, and I think people are interested in that type of stuff. Good question, and the kind of thing that I think we should think about before we post.

Wow! Great summary of posts so far. I'm definitely looking forward to reading as many of these as I can.

And great question posed by Seattle Wine Gal. As for whether these posts matter to those those who aren't wine bloggers, I think they do matter! I can't speak for all of these bloggers, but I know many of them do have readership outside of the blogging world that will find many of these posts interesting and helpful. If anything I am confident that it raises awareness for Washington wines, and those readers outside of the blog world or wine industry for that matter may be more curious to pick up a bottle of Washington wine. I think it also raises awareness for how many of us are out there... and growing. And even if some of them only appeal to other wine bloggers it is nice to know we have a supportive community out there and hopefully will inspire people to expand their content to reach out to a broader audience.

SPS, I actually wrote my post after several people asked me for more information that what I was posting to facebook. Because of that, I did the general write-up listed here, plus I wrote a fairly long forum post over on the WLTV forums.

I've already added a second one that just focused on our vineyard tour Saturday morning, and in the next few weeks I'll probably intersperse a few more focused posts in among non-WBC ones. I'm trying to keep them interesting enough for non-bloggers and even non-wine drinkers. Honestly, most of my readers are from outside of the wine blogging community anyway. :)

As a non-wine blogger weighing in to SWG's question, the WBC10 posts and tweets that interest me are ones about the wines you all tried, social media tips that could apply to any business, and twitpics of the weekend.

I particularly appreciated the posts/tweets about wine where price was mentioned. I favorited a lot of those tweets and went to the wine shop w/ Tweetdeck opened on my iPhone. I still have quite a few to try. I'd love to see a blog with the best wines you tried under $20, then $20-40, etc.

And if participating wineries wanted to offer a coupon code or specials for those of us following these conferences (drooling at home at all the great wine you're drinking), that'd be really cool. It would be incentive for non-wine people to follow what you guys are talking about.

But frankly, I gloss over the posts/tweets with a lot of wine-speak and zillions of hashtags/twitter handles. I've found I click through when people are simple, pithy, fun, informative, or they have a twitpic.

Laurie is the type of reader I look for. Someone who takes her hard-earned cash into consideration.It's my opinion that when I pay for a wine bottle, I have a better appreciation for its presentation and value. That aspect cannot be achieved in a shotgun-style tasting room flyby or a free sample.What also helps is the reviewer also notes what the implied value is of that wine. Was it worth it? Beats the heck out of point scales, stars, QPR, and other rectally-destined ratings. Just say it...how much should I pay for it?~WAwineman

I'm with Mary and Laurie. There are lots of us out there that don't blog, but are (at least somewhat) knowledgeable, buy a reasonable amount of wine (and consume it!), and talk with others of a like mind. Getting other points of view and experiences are definitely useful. We're all part of a community whether we blog or just yak (and drink) with our wino compatriots about it. It's all useful!

Fantastic work by the hardest working man in the blog business. Thanks, Sean!

As to whether these posts are informative to non-bloggers, I'd guess that depends on the individual reader and blog. A regular reader of a particular blog probably knows that blogger's style and wouldn't be thrown off by a post or two about the WBC. One thing I know the WBC did for me was refreshen my brain cells about blog topics and teach me ways to improve the IT side of my blog and its presentation. In the long run I think (and hope) my reader(s) will see an overall improvement based on things I garnered in W2.