I’ve always been baffled by people who believe in strong intellectual property rights but have no problems with public libraries. When I point out that libraries can be looked at as “legalized intellectual property theft”, a rationalization usually comes out. Like “it helps poor kids” or “it creates a more education society” or something stupid like that. (?!?) When I hear things like that it makes me wonder if people really think through their morals or if they rather act first, then rationalize later.