"But what the Kondratieff wave is about is a study of long cycles of debt buildup and repudiation. It is not exclusively about price inflation and deflation periods. Deflation is caused in part by the debt collapse. It is also a generational thing as the next cycle of debt buildup and collapse is renewed every 2-3 generations as the previous generation that went through comparable periods dies off. The old adage that "this time it is different" means the circumstances are different, yes, but they fail to recognize that the previous period was the same in terms of excesses and therefore the end result is the same."

__________________

__________________
Sometimes death is not as tragic as not knowing how to live. This man knew how to live--and how to make others glad they were living. - Jack Benny at Nat King Cole's funeral

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Actually, that could be considered to be somewhat encouraging. If we were to experience marked expansion and growth beginning in 2016-2017, that would be a lot better than if we experienced runaway, double or triple digit inflation, for example.

Oh yes, I know, I am in SUCH a cheerful, positive mood this afternoon...

__________________

__________________5/17/2018: Retired a second time, this time from my volunteer Admin duties. After 10 years of being on the team, and 40,000+ posts, the time just seemed right. It has been such fun to work with all of our Mods and Admins and I plan to stick around as a regular member.

This actually looks quite a lot like the secular bull/secular bear thing. If this bear market cycle were compared to the 1966-82 bear market, then we're probably in 1974 right now.

__________________"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?"-- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)

Perfect! I started investing in 2000, and would like to retire around 2020. If those predictions hold true (new expansion phase starting in 2016-2018), then I will have invested my money at the best time (during a secular bear market) and retired at the best time too (at the beginning of a new secular bull market). Off course, first, I have to survive Kondratieff's phase 4 (depression)...

Perfect! I started investing in 2000, and would like to retire around 2020. If those predictions hold true (new expansion phase starting in 2016-2018), then I will have invested my money at the best time (during a secular bear market) and retired at the best time too (at the beginning of a new secular bull market). Off course, first, I have to survive Kondratieff's phase 4 (depression)...

Ditto! Looking to retire in 2016 at age 55. I've been saving and investing pretty much my entire adult life, but I accelerated it starting about 2000 when my salary increased significantly.

This period does remind me of 66-82. And I agree we are now at the 74-75 point. War winding down in Iraq (Vietnam) inflation in the pipeline. The only problem I see is we elected Regan in 82 and he cut taxes and reduced regulations. Now we are faced with increased taxes and more regulation. Old Europe is worse off than we are so that leaves the emerging markets to be the growth engine. I hope they are up to it.

__________________“I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said” Alan Greenspan

Then, if we wait long enough, the pendulum will swing back. Hope I will live or survive financially until then. Sigh!

PS. I will not blame the government for this. The economic cycle is a scourge of society. Leaders as well as us individuals have to move with the flow. I do not blame nor expect miracle from anyone. It's just bad karma, as they say.

I will not blame the government for this. The economic cycle is a scourge of society. Leaders as well as us individuals have to move with the flow. I do not blame nor expect miracle from anyone. It's just bad karma, as they say.

I DO blame the government/bureaucracy for this NW.

Because Greenspan tried to fight the natural business cycle and kept interest rates artificially low early in the decade to try to keep the dot-com bubble going, the economy overheated and we are much worse off.

__________________Consult with only myself as your adviser or representative. My thoughts should be construed as investment advice of the highest caliber. Past performance is but a pale shadow and guarantee of even greater results in the future.

I agree also. Governments magnify problems in its attempt to avoid downturns in various areas of the economy when they occur. It can also cause the problem as it did with the expansion of the railroads in the USA.

__________________
Sometimes death is not as tragic as not knowing how to live. This man knew how to live--and how to make others glad they were living. - Jack Benny at Nat King Cole's funeral

lol ... sorry, it's funny (to me) that I was laughed at for talking about Kondratieff two years ago.

You should be careful though, I don't think Kondratieff is a good predicative tool. For example, 'Winter' has already been delayed by quite a bit. It should have hit in the late 90's - starting with LTCM and the asian currency crises (and then the dot.com bust). It didn't though, and we had the credit bubble as a false boom. You could argue that people are living longer (is it due to a generational effect?), and that modern govt. is somewhat good at fighting it (all the stimulus in 2002), which delayed the inevitable. Don't know.

At any rate, all the effort we are doing to stop a necessary downturn would only make it longer I suspect. Yes 10 years at least. Very Austrian school of economics thinking - crazy, I know.

Yes, yes. I agree that Greenspan's low interest rates were one of the enablers of the current mess. But just one.

I maintain a more fatalistic view of this fiasco. Remember how Greenspan was revered, how the world hangs on his every word? The nation wanted a Greenspan. If not this Greenspan, there would be another Greenspan.

Oh, I remember reading some dissident views on his low interest rate policies. But for one published viewpoint decrying the bubble that this would create, there were one thousand other voices that wanted lower interest rates for longer, that this free cash would create prosperity. And remember all the people who directly profited from this, the loan processors, RE appraisers, the local and WallSt bankers. And as investors, we all enjoyed the rich dividends that our mutual funds paid out.

I'm with the "that would be perfect!" crowd in regards to the anticipated timing of our retirement.

As long as the wife and I can stay employed with an income high enough to continue saving aggressively thru what later proves to be the downpoint of a cyclical economic wave it should prove to be a positive thing down the road.

This isn’t what the conventional wisdom tells us. The CW would tell us that the older you are, the more devastating any loss. Why? Because the recovery time is short. People in their 30s, 40s, or 50s can rebuild their portfolio buying stocks at lower prices. As a result, they may benefit from a stock market crash.

A retiree, on the other hand, probably isn’t saving and must depend on the diminished value of his savings for income. Surely that’s bad news.

...

If prospective returns are higher in low valuation markets, perhaps retirees can safely increase their withdrawal rates. Research by financial planner Michael Kitces has shown that the usual 4 percent rule of thumb for initial withdrawal rates from retirement nest eggs can be increased in periods of low valuation. A typical 60/40 (equity/fixed income) portfolio, for instance, will only support a safe withdrawal rate of 4.4 percent in a high valuation market. But it will safely sustain a 5.7 percent withdrawal rate in a low valuation market.

__________________"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu

Ok I'll bite. So does this mean we can expect about 14% return in the next four years, per the article? Is that annually or total for the 5 years?

Oh! I was thinking along the lines of "less bad" than "more great."

Quote:

Either way, the loss in spending power is a lot less than the loss in portfolio value.

We don’t live with the idea of spending all our money in the next year. We live as though we were going to be around for a while because, well, we probably will be.

But hey, that's only me... I am pretty slow sometimes (most?).

__________________"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu

Latest Threads

Social Knowledge Community

About Us

This community was started in 2002 as an alternative to a then fee only Motley Fool. The focus of the discussions is on topics related to early retirement and financial independence. The community is moderated to ensure a pleasant experience for our members.