A Brief History of People Who Claimed To Know the Zodiac Killer's Identity

News broke today via New York Magazine's Daily Intelligencer that we're about to get a new Zodiac Killer suspect to add to an ever-growing list. About 1,200 people have claimed to know who the Zodiac Killer is. Here are a few of them.

News broke today via New York Magazine's Daily Intelligencer that we're about to get a new Zodiac Killer suspect to add to an ever-growing list. In The Most Dangerous Animal of All, being released tomorrow, Gary L. Stewart claims his father was the Zodiac Killer, who killed at least five people in the late 60s but was never caught.

Of course, Stewart is hardly the first person to accuse a friend or family member of being the Zodiac Killer. According to the Los Angeles Times, "about 1,200" people have claimed to know who the Zodiac Killer is. Here are just a few others:

Deborah Perez

Supposed Zodiac Killer: Her father, Guy Ward Hendrickson.

Evidence for: In 2009, Perez claimed that she wrote some of the letters her father, who died in 1983, sent to police officers and embroidered the mask he wore during some of his murders. She gave a pair of glasses she believed belonged to one of the killer's victims to police.

Evidence against: The police said the glasses did not belong to the murder victim. Perez's half-sister told the OC Register her father was not the Zodiac Killer and threatened to sue for defamation. Perez has also made a few other dubious claims, like that she is the daughter of JFK.

Robert Tarbox

Supposed Zodiac Killer: A merchant seaman Tarbox will not name. Tarbox was his lawyer very briefly.

Evidence for: In 2009, Tarbox claimed that, one night in the "early 70s," a man who said he was a merchant marine walked into his office, paid him $50, and confessed to being the Zodiac Killer. Then he left and Tarbox never saw him again.

Evidence against: Tarbox's law license was suspended in 1975 for five years. He says attorney-client privilege prevents him from naming the merchant marine, so even if police did investigate his claims (and it doesn't appear that they will), they wouldn't have much to go on.

Dennis Kaufman

Supposed Zodiac Killer: His stepfather, Jack Tarrance.

Evidence for: Kaufman says his stepfather's handwriting was similar to the Zodiac Killer's and that he found a bloody knife, a black hood like the one the killer wore, and film rolls with "sinister images." He sent the hood and stamps Tarrance licked to the FBI for analysis. According to Kaufman's website, his stepfather died in 2006.

Evidence against: Kaufman also thinks his stepfather might be the Black Dahlia and the Lipstick Killer (although another man confessed and was convicted of those murders). No word on the results of those items sent to the FBI.

Steve Hodel

Supposed Zodiac Killer: His father, George Hill Hodel

Evidence for: Hodel is a former LAPD homicide detective who has written several books on the crimes he believes his father, who died in 1999, committed. He says his father had the same shoe size as the Zodiac Killer, and his father was a columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle in the 30s -- the same newspaper the Zodiac Killer sent taunting letters to.

Evidence against: Hodel's father would have been a few decades older than the Zodiac Killer was believed to be. Like Dennis Kaufman, Hodel also claims his father was the Black Dahlia murderer and the Lipstick Killer. Oh, and the Jigsaw Murderer in the Philippines. The LA Times' Daily Mirror called his book where he tried to connect his father with the Zodiac murders "a joke," noting that Hodel says his father's shoe size was 10E, like the Zodiac Killer, but one of his other purported victims was killed by someone wearing a size 6 or 7 shoe. Also, in some cases, the handwriting samples Hodel offers up as his father's to compare to the Zodiac Killer's actually came from Elizabeth Short (the Black Dahlia victim. Or maybe she's the Zodiac Killer, too).

Randy Kenney

Supposed Zodiac Killer: His friend, Louis Myers.

Evidence for: Kenney came forward earlier this year and said that, in 2001, Myers told him on his deathbed that he was the Zodiac Killer. He also "begged" Kenney to write a book about it. Myers lived near some of the murders and may have gone to high school with two of the victims and worked with another victim. Another friend of Myers' said he confessed to him in 1976 that he was the killer, but the friend thought Myers was joking. He's not so sure about that now!

Evidence against: Kenney said he told the San Francisco police about Myers, but they wanted some kind of evidence and Kenney doesn't have it. Myers does not match the description of the killer, and police don't think a teenager -- which Myers was at the time of the murders -- could have done it.

Lyndon Lafferty

Supposed Zodiac Killer: "George Russell Tucker" (Lafferty declines to give the man's real name), who was 91 years young as of 2012, when Lafferty published his book. Lafferty, then a California Highway Patrol officer, saw Tucker at a rest stop and thought he looked scary.

Evidence for: In a 2011 San Francisco Chronicle article, Lafferty said Tucker fits the description of the killer and that his real name is spelled out in one of the letters he sent police officers. The sister of one of the killer's victims thinks Lafferty is right, and an FBI agent said it was "possible" that Lafferty's theory was correct.

Evidence against: That same FBI agent also said Lafferty's findings were not enough to solve the case. When Tucker died in 2012, the Chronicle said " law enforcement agencies do not consider him a suspect" and therefore refused to publish his name.

Most Popular

The special counsel indicted the Russian nationals and three Russian entities for allegedly interfering in the 2016 presidential election, the Department of Justice announced Friday.

On Friday, February 16, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosentein announced that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, had indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities on charges that including conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft. This is the full text of that indictment.

Students have mourned and rallied the public after the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High that left 17 dead.

Something was different about the mass shooting this week in Parkland, Florida, in which 14 students and three adults were killed.

It was not only the death toll. The mass murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High became the deadliest high-school shooting in American history (edging out Columbine, which killed 13 in 1999).

What made Parkland different were the people who stepped forward to describe it. High-school students—the survivors of the calamity themselves—became the voice of the tragedy. Tweets that were widely reported as coming from the students expressed grief for the victims, pushed against false reports, and demanded accountability.

Outrage mobs are chipping away at democracy, one meaningless debate at a time.

The mob was unusually vociferous, even for Twitter. After the California-born ice skater Mirai Nagasu became the first American woman to land a triple axel at the Olympics, the New York Times writer Bari Weiss commented “Immigrants: They get the job done.”

What followed that innocuous tweet was one of the sillier, manufactured controversies I have ever seen on Twitter. Twitter’s socially conscious denizens probably only realized they should be outraged at Weiss after they saw other people being outraged, as is so often the case. Outside of Twitter, some of Weiss’s Times colleagues were also offended by the tweet—and even hurt by it. The critics’objection was that Nagasu isn’t herself an immigrant, but rather the child of immigrants, and so calling her one was an example of “perpetual othering.”

Tech analysts are prone to predicting utopia or dystopia. They’re worse at imagining the side effects of a firm's success.

The U.S economy is in the midst of a wrenching technological transformation that is fundamentally changing the way people sleep, work, eat, shop, love, read, and interact.

At least, that’s one interpretation.

A second story of this age of technological transformation says that it’s mostly a facade—that the last 30 years have been a productivity bust and little has changed in everyday life, aside from the way everyone reads and watches videos. People wanted flying cars and got Netflix binges instead.

Let’s call these the Disrupt Story and the Dud Story of technology. When a new company, app, or platform emerges, it’s common for analysts to divide into camps—Disrupt vs. Dud—with some yelping that the new thing will change everything and others yawning with the expectation that traditionalism will win out.

The Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig discusses how Aaron Swartz's death shaped his own life's work.

Before he started working with Aaron Swartz, the Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig built his professional life around internet law and copyright policy. In the early 2000s, Lessig was at the top of his academic field, then working at Stanford. As an undergraduate student, Swartz, who had met Lessig at a computer conference when he was just 14, convinced the professor to radically change his career path.

The two developed a mentorship and partnership that would lead them to take on the complex goals of making information more accessible and demanding greater transparency from political institutions. Swartz became known for his involvement in Creative Commons and Reddit, and for his alleged attempt to make information from the academic-research site JSTOR free for public viewing. And then, in January of 2013, Swartz committed suicide. Lessig is still reeling from the loss.

The clear goal of the special counsel is to speak to the American public about the seriousness of Russian interference.

With yet another blockbuster indictment (why is it always on a Friday afternoon?), Special Counsel Robert Mueller has, once again, upended Washington. And this time, it is possible that his efforts may have a wider effect outside the Beltway.

For those following the matter, there has been little doubt that Russian citizens attempted to interfere with the American presidential election. The American intelligence agencies publicized that conclusion more than a year ago in a report issued in January 2017, and it has stood by the analysis whenever it has been questioned. But some in the country have doubted the assertion—asking for evidence of interference that was not forthcoming.

Now the evidence has been laid out in painful detail by the special counsel. If any significant fraction of what is alleged in the latest indictment is true (and we should, of course, remind ourselves that an indictment is just an allegation—not proof), then this tale is a stunning condemnation of Russian activity. A Russian organization with hundreds of employees and a budget of millions of dollars is said to have systematically engaged in an effort (code named “Project Lakhta”) to undermine the integrity of the election and, perhaps more importantly, to have attempted to influence the election to benefit then-candidate Donald Trump. Among the allegations, the Russians:

The director Ryan Coogler's addition to the Marvel pantheon is a superb genre film—and quite a bit more.

Note: Although this review avoids plot spoilers, it does discuss the thematic elements of the film at some length.

After an animated introduction to the fictional African kingdom of Wakanda, Black Panther opens in Oakland in 1992. This may seem an odd choice, but it is in fact quite apt. The film’s director, Ryan Coogler, got his start in the city, having been born there in 1986. His filmmaking career has its roots there, too, as it was the setting for his debut feature, Fruitvale Station.

A bunch of schoolboys (a fictionalized young Coogler perhaps among them) play pickup hoops on a court with a milk-crate basket. But in the tall apartment building above them two black radicals are plotting a robbery. There’s a knock on the door and one of the men looks through the peephole: “Two Grace Jones–lookin’ chicks—with spears!” I won’t recount the rest of the scene, except to note that the commingling of two very different iterations of the term “Black Panther”—the comic-book hero and the revolutionary organization, ironically established just months apart in 1966—is in no way accidental, and it will inform everything that follows.

Like it or not, the middle class became global citizens through consumerism—and they did so at the mall.

“Okay, we’ll see you in two-and-a-half hours,” the clerk tells me, taking the iPhone from my hand. I’m at the Apple Store, availing myself of a cheap smartphone battery replacement, an offer the company made after taking heat for deliberately slowing down devices. A test run by a young woman typing at a feverish, unnatural pace on an iPad confirms that mine desperately needed the swap. As she typed, I panicked. What will I do in the mall for so long, and without a phone? How far the mall has fallen that I rack my brain for something to do here.

The Apple Store captures everything I don’t like about today’s mall. A trip here is never easy—the place is packed and chaotic, even on weekdays. It runs by its own private logic, cashier and help desks replaced by roving youths in seasonally changing, colored T-shirts holding iPads, directing traffic.

The company’s unusual offer—to give employees up to $5,000 for leaving—may actually be a way to get them to stay longer.

On Monday, Amazon reportedly began a series of rare layoffs at its headquarters in Seattle, cutting several hundred corporate employees. But this week, something quite different is happening at the company’s warehouses and customer-service centers across the country: Amazon will politely ask its “associates”—full-time and part-time hourly employees—if they’d prefer to quit. And if they do, Amazon will pay them as much as $5,000 for walking out the door.

Officially called “The Offer,” this proposition is, according to Amazon, a way to encourage unhappy employees to move on. “We believe staying somewhere you don’t want to be isn’t healthy for our employees or for the company,” Ashley Robinson, an Amazon spokesperson, wrote to me in an email. The amount full-time employees get offered ranges from $2,000 to $5,000, and depends on how long they have been at the company; if they take the money, they agree to never work for Amazon again. (The idea for all this originated at Zappos, the online shoe retailer that Amazon bought in 2009.)

Leggings and yoga gear are common sights at practice rinks. But in competition, gender-coded costumes still prevail.

Last weekend, one of the buzzier stories out of the Olympic ladies’ figure skating short program competition was one you might call … surprisingly surprising. The French figure skater Maé-Bérénice Méité made headlines: for the fact that she skated to a Beyoncé medley, and even more so, for the fact that she did it in pants.

More accurately, she did it in a bedazzled black unitard, but that didn’t stop news outlets and viewers on Twitter from pointing out Méité’s eye-catching, subtly subversive pants. “This French figure skater may not have won a medal, but her pants took people's choice,” raved Yahoo! News, and AOL named Méité’s bodysuit to its list of “most dazzling figure skating outfits” of these Olympic Games.