Comments for joe.montihttp://www.joemonti.org
My thoughts on tech, stuff, and nonsense.Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:15:40 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.9Comment on LIDAR-Lite Optical Distance Sensor by Himanihttp://www.joemonti.org/2014/01/27/lidar-lite-optical-distance-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-125601
Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:15:40 +0000http://joemonti.org/?p=513#comment-125601Good but very few points are mentioned about LiDAR lite optical distance sensor. Thanks for sharing.
]]>Comment on Vex Robotics Transmitter/Receiver on Arduino by cars low preces Tustinhttp://www.joemonti.org/2013/06/27/vex-robotics-transmitterreceiver-on-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-124579
Wed, 10 May 2017 15:12:18 +0000http://joemonti.org/?p=379#comment-124579sebagi seorang islam,kita kena jaga hubungan kita dengan Allah dan juga hubungan kita sesama manusia.renungkanlah. terutama di bulam Ramadhan ini… jaga nilai puasa kita juga. saling mengingati sesama kita
]]>Comment on HoverDrone : A Semi-Autonomous Quadcopter : Part 1 by quadrocopterversicherung.comhttp://www.joemonti.org/2013/06/25/hoverdrone-a-semi-autonomous-quadcopter-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-124463
Fri, 05 May 2017 07:58:25 +0000http://joemonti.org/?p=360#comment-124463Krasser Beitrag. Allerdings will ich sagen, dass man sich nicht immer darauf verlassen darf. Bodenständigkeit ist oft besser als Wolkenkuckungsheime. Alle Liebe https://quadrocopterversicherung.com
]]>Comment on Vex Robotics Transmitter/Receiver on Arduino by Cuadricoptero.techhttp://www.joemonti.org/2013/06/27/vex-robotics-transmitterreceiver-on-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-124204
Sun, 23 Apr 2017 00:04:17 +0000http://joemonti.org/?p=379#comment-124204Agradable respuesta en respuesta a esta cuestión con argumentos genuinos y
Contando todo lo relacionado con eso.
]]>Comment on Vex Robotics Transmitter/Receiver on Arduino by http://www./http://www.joemonti.org/2013/06/27/vex-robotics-transmitterreceiver-on-arduino/comment-page-1/#comment-123203
Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:53:14 +0000http://joemonti.org/?p=379#comment-123203You wanna know what I think? No? Well okay….I'll tell you anyway:DI think that the Anons are really only just one. Just one playing all the different Anons!!! 😉 Yup!Anyway is everybody or their wife or mom thawing the turkey??? It's Thanksgiving Day tomorrow! We're supposed to be united and giving thanks! and getting ready to pig out! I just love it!
]]>Comment on Digital Theft Isn’t Theft At All by joemontihttp://www.joemonti.org/writings/digital-theft-isnt-theft-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-122879
Thu, 09 Feb 2017 18:59:52 +0000http://joemonti.org/?page_id=8#comment-122879Thank you Mark. I think the evidence showed that album sales (including digital sales) actually went up with the rise of music (so-called) piracy, but that’s not really the point. I am not trying to imply that digital theft has no impact on the content owners. Just that it is very different than with physical theft with different implications to who has what, who doesn’t, and who should and who shouldn’t.
]]>Comment on Digital Theft Isn’t Theft At All by Markhttp://www.joemonti.org/writings/digital-theft-isnt-theft-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-122743
Thu, 02 Feb 2017 23:56:10 +0000http://joemonti.org/?page_id=8#comment-122743So is the debate an issue of whether digital theft is the same as physical theft? Maybe it’s a debate to be had among the creators of the content being taken. I’m sure it wouldn’t take much research to find out if album sales begin dropping after it becomes available on share sites
]]>Comment on Digital Theft Isn’t Theft At All by joemontihttp://www.joemonti.org/writings/digital-theft-isnt-theft-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-120926
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:00:42 +0000http://joemonti.org/?page_id=8#comment-120926Thank you for your comment. But I assure you I have No Agenda of my own. I think you missed the point of my post. The use of Digital Theft is not an evolution, it is a convolution (twisting the meaning, making more complicated).

By calling it Digital Theft, it is purposely evoking a connotation with the physical act of theft both socially and legally. It is done specifically to increase the fear and maximize punishment, which is all too often not appropriate. I’m not trying to debate what is appropriate, just that the relation to physical theft is inappropriate.

Also, the idea of theft has been around for millennia. Your examples are evolutions of relatively new concepts in art and technology, therefore lack the historical baggage.

You could just as easily call it a Digital Hug. We still use the word “hug” in the physical world, we would just be additionally applying it to technology (Yes, I being somewhat facetious).

]]>Comment on Digital Theft Isn’t Theft At All by Mattwohttp://www.joemonti.org/writings/digital-theft-isnt-theft-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-120924
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 06:41:36 +0000http://joemonti.org/?page_id=8#comment-120924Man are you stuck in the past. Or maybe you’re just trying to further a personal agenda?

The English language changes and evolves whether we like it or not, like how people use the phrase “traditional animation” to refer to tablet-drawn art when literally the only part that can even remotely be considered traditional is the hand-drawn part and in that case it should just be called hand-drawn.

People also tend to say “CG” or “CGI” or “computer graphics” to refer solely to rendered 3D as though anything else that was made on a computer like say tablet hand drawn art isn’t CGI even though you’re literally drawing pixels on a screen.

Let’s not forget the constant misuse of the word “sentient” even outside of sci-fi.

I’ve spoken out against this kind of bullshit on multiple occasions but no one ever listens. I certainty hope you don’t expect anyone to listen to what you have to say here too.