On October 23, 2008 Radio Canada’s “Les Grands Reportages” aired Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land. This is an excellent documentary which exposes the disconnect between what is taking place on the ground in Palestine and the American media’s reporting of these events. It can be viewed on google videos.

A systematic pressure campaign was organized against Radio-Canada for airing this documentary and resulted in an investigation by the Ombudsman. In her report, it is clear that the Ombudsman has adopted all the pro-occupation arguments of the complainants. She comes to the conclusion that the documentary should never have been aired. Read Radio-Canada Ombudsman’s report.

I received 156 complaints about this broadcast. Most of those filing complaints, who were in various countries, did so in response to an appeal by HonestReporting Canada, a pro-Israel media watchdog that encouraged visitors to its website to send complaints to my office

Oh dear! The Zionist J-ws launch a campaign.

The documentary Paix, propagande et Terre promise meets these criteria. The film claims, without proving it, that the government of Israel controls U.S. print and electronic media. In order to illustrate this argument, the film uses excerpts from television newscasts that fail to mention the fact that the Palestinian territories are occupied by Israel. This omission, the choice of words, and the routine absence of context reinforce false perceptions among the U.S. public, according to the film. There is no fairness, balance, or nuance here: this pro-Palestinian documentary presents one point of view, one side of the coin. All those interviewed—academics, Israeli and Palestinian activists, media critics and journalists—agree with this perspective.

What is not mentioned is that 100% of the reporting on the CBC is pro-Isr-el, ever since the CJC J-w Rabbinovitch was head of CBC. But careers in Canada are dependent upon serving the J-w, so the Ombudsman caved for her self-interest.

Masha Vallenchenko is an attorney involved in human rights issues in Russia, previously having worked in the human rights legal department directly under President Putin's administration. Over the past few years she has been embarked on research of the greatest violation of human rights and life in the history of the world... that is the 1917 Revolution in Russia and its tragic consequences for so many Russians.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Susan Chira, is the chief Foreign Editor of the flagship Zionist newspaper, The New York Times.

Previously, she was the editor of the "Week in Review" section at The Times, after having served as deputy foreign editor of the newspaper since February 1997. Prior to that, she served in a variety of reporting positions including national education correspondent, correspondent for the newspaper in Tokyo from October 1984 until February 1989, metropolitan reporter in the Albany and Stamford bureaus, and reporter for the Business Day section. Ms. Chira joined The Times as a trainee on the metropolitan desk in 1981 and was promoted to reporter in July 1982. Ms. Chira received a B.A. degree in history and East Asian studies from Harvard University. As an undergraduate, she was a reporter and later president of The Harvard Crimson.

Ms. Chira is married to Michael Shapiro, a professor of journalism at the Columbia University School of Journalism.

samedi 28 mars 2009

AIPAC is considered the most powerful and connected lobbying group in Washington.

The Justice Department is feeling the heat as it continues the prosecution of former AIPAC staffers Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman.

The two officials from the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) were in 2005 indicted for passing along secret US documents to Israel in violation of the 1917 Espionage Act.

The American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League, two top Jewish lobby groups in the US, are demanding the Justice Department reconsider its case against Rosen and Weissman.

"The prosecution creates a chilling effect on legitimate speech," AJC Executive Director David Harris said in a statement last week.

"Based upon the facts that the government has divulged thus far, we hope the Department of Justice will take a close look at this case and reconsider whether it should be pursued further," he added.

In late 2004, the New York Times reported that Weissman along with fellow AIPAC employee Rosen had been questioned regarding their involvement in an espionage case.

Larry Franklin, a Middle East analyst at the Defense Intelligence Agency, was also driven into the case for allegedly passing classified information about Iran to the AIPAC members who had relayed the sensitive information to the government of Israel.

The ADL also recently released a letter it had sent last September to the deputy attorney general urging him to "review the charges, the investigation, and the prosecution of this case."

"We are mindful of and fully support our government's need to protect sensitive national security information," read the letter. "This prosecution, however, is not necessary for such protection."

The Anti-Defamation League has come under severe criticism from political analysts for serving Israel's interests rather than those of the United States.

"The ADL has virtually become 'one of the main pillars' of Israeli propaganda in the US, as the Israeli press casually describes it, engaged in surveillance, blacklisting, compilation of FBI-style files circulated to adherents for the purpose of defamation, angry public responses to criticism of Israeli actions, and so on.," renowned American author and political analyst Noam Chomsky wrote in his 1989 book Necessary Illusions.

"These efforts, buttressed by insinuations of anti-Semitism or direct accusations, are intended to deflect or undermine opposition to Israeli policies, including Israel's refusal, with US support, to move towards a general political settlement," he adds.

Meanwhile, AIPAC, considered the most powerful and connected lobbying group in Washington, has been subject to controversy in the past.

In 1992, the group's then president David Steiner was forced to resign after he was recorded boasting about his political influence in obtaining aid for Israel.

Steiner claimed to be "negotiating" with the incoming Clinton administration over who Clinton would appoint as Secretary of State and Director of the National Security Agency.

AIPAC is a "de facto agent for a foreign government", whose "success is due to its ability to reward legislators and congressional candidates who support its agenda, and to punish those who challenge it," University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt from the Harvard University argue in their book: The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.

Former President Jimmy Carter has also accused AIPAC of putting enormous pressure on politicians running for office who do not share AIPAC's goals.

MT/MD

Steve Rosen Accuses AIPAC of Espionage Steven J. Rosen’s defamation lawsuit against the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is now entering a critical phase. A series of cross-filings stakes out the critical court terrain. Rosen intends to show that obtaining and leveraging classified U.S. government information in the service of Israel is common practice at AIPAC. He claims it was unfair for AIPAC to fire and malign him in the press after he was indicted on espionage charges in 2005. AIPAC’s defense team is committed to getting the case thrown out on technicalities before it goes to trial early next year.

5. The first people arrested only hours after the 9-11 attacks were Jewish (Dancing Israelis), as was the man who eventually freed them, Michael Chertoff.

6. Dov Zakheim - known as the 9-11 Mastermind (Jewish)

7. The high tech companies that broke america's secret communication codes and back-doored their way into computer and telephone databanks were Israeli-owned.

8. Israel-Zionists have a firm grip on the banks at the top of the world's control pyramid.

9 They were also in charge of security at the WTC towers and the airports on 9-11. Only one entity had inside access to all of the vital airports on 9-11 in order to breech security - it was an Israeli-owned company.

10. The American mass media monopoly is Jewish/zionist owned and controlled - the spinmeisters who shaped public perception and have worked in a symbiotic relationship with the other players > cover-up.

11. The blueprint for the 9-11 attack was penned by rabid zionists, many of them Jewish. (PNAC report, Rebuilding America's Defenses)

Four Strategic focal points had to be set in place before the 9-11 attacks could take place:

a) Imperative that George W. Bush be selected President in November, 2000.

b) The Pentagon and Defense forces had to be commandeered by the inside culprits.

c) The WTC towers needed to be purchased from NYC's Port Authority.

d) Security at specific airports and at the WTC complex had to be controlled.

These four points had to be locked in to set the wheels of 9-11 in motion.

The entire 9-11 operation was Israeli-controlled, from soup to nuts. Israel had the means, the motive, the opportunity,and the resources to pull it off (with help from their cronies ).

It gets more involved than this, but the above gives you a pretty good idea, I think. Our book (not Michael Collin's Piper's book) on Israel's central role in 9-11 should be released in a few weeks.

Soup to nuts, name one other nation in the world who had the means, motive, opportunity and resources to pull off 9-11. Who, among nations, has benefitted from 9-11 and the subsequent war on terror the most? Israel.

The Secret History of How America's Zionist "Neo-Conservative" Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empireby Michael Collins Piper

* THAT the war against Iraq being waged by the American administration of President George W. Bush is not only contrary to traditional "conservative" American principles, but contrary to all principles of American foreign policy during the last half century;

* THAT the war against Iraq is being waged for far more broad ranging purposes than "regime change" or "eliminating weapons of mass destruction"; first and foremost, as part of an overall effort to establish the United States as the sole international super-power, capable military and economically, to suppress any nations and/or peoples who dare to challenge American hegemony;

* THAT the war against Iraq is simply a first step in a long-standing, wide-ranging plan to launch an even more aggressive move against the entire Arab Middle East in order to "remake the Arab world" to secure the survival of - and expand the power of - THE STATE OF ISRAEL;

* THAT the war against Iraq is only the initial target of this carefully planned scheme and that, ultimately, other Arab and Muslim states are slated for outright extinction or some form of occupation or control by American military and political forces (IN ALLIANCE WITH ISRAEL);

* THAT the war against Iraq and the plan for the subjugation of the Arab people is quite simply a modified, modernized adaptation of the historic zionist dream of "Greater Israel," adjusted to meet the demands of the international oil companies, which are, in turn, fully prepared to share the aim of dominating the oil producing states of the Arab world IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE STATE OF ISRAEL;

* THAT the war against Iraq was deliberately orchestrated by a small but powerful network of hard-line "right wing" Zionist elements - the self-styled "neo-conservatives" - at the highest levels of the Bush administration, skillfully aided and abetted by like-minded persons in public policy organizations, think tanks, publications and other institutions, all of which are closely interconnected and, in turn linked to HARD-LINE "LIKUDNIK" FORCES IN ISRAEL;

* THAT the war against Iraq and the additional moves by the United States against the Arab world that are slated to follow can be traced to Zionist political intrigue inside the upper levels of the U.S. intelligence community, reaching as far back as the early 1970s, and that many of the same players involved in that activity are now guiding Bush administration policy today;

* THAT the war against Iraq is an adjunct to the previously declared "war against terrorism" which was, in itself, part of a long evolving and carefully coordinated propaganda campaign founded on the theory that terrorism is somehow an "Arab" trait.

Friday, May 11, 2007

"It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel]"

Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, September 11, 2001

Cui bono? Who benefited from the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001? It wasn't Muslims.

Israel and its agents haveinfiltrated the American political system on all levels, and over the decades have consolidated a virtual stranglehold over the legislative, judicial and executive branches via a well-established network of individuals, organisations and lobby groups. The so-called neoconservatives who occupy Washington - most of themJewish and many of them dual citizenship Israeli-Americans - have structured the foreign policy of the United States of America around the best interests of the State of Israel and the geopolitical ideology of Zionism, thus fomenting wars in the Middle East to fulfill the strategic regional objectives of Israel, which has not only cost the lives of countless clueless Americans but threatens to bring down their entire nation.

Israel's influence in post-9/11, Zionist-occupied Washington is so great that it has managed to mobilise the world's largest war machine to fight two proxy wars in the Middle East for the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv, both within two years of the 2001 attacks, at the expense of the lives of America's sons and daughters and its moral standing in the global community -- two bloody wars that continue to claim American, Afghani and Iraqi lives to the present day. None of it would've been possible without the 9/11 catalyst, which is testimony to the success of the project.

Zionist influence is now so powerful and so pervasive in America that U.S. Middle East policy is determined by no other criteria than that which serves the geopolitical objectives of the State of Israel. U.S. foreign policy is essentially Israeli foreign policy - thus the attacks on Afghanistan, the insanity of preemptive war and occupation in Iraq, and the planned strike on Iran - all disastrous policy decisions that benefit the Zionist parasite to the detriment of America and the rest of the world.

9/11 was a false flag attack on the United States, designed to kick-start Netanyahu's nonsensical "war on terror" doctrine and garner public support for war with Israel's perceived enemies, those "existential threats" to Zionism: the Arab states and whoever else stands in the way of a "Greater Israel". It was an Israeli psy-op conceived by a Zionist elite, and it was a roaring success.

This brief summary of the evidence connecting Israel to the events surrounding the attacks of 9/11/01 is in point form and by no means exhaustive or complete, so in most cases only one of many available online references is provided via hyperlink.

Jews were deeply involved in the Enron scandal but were able to utilize the Jewish medias influence and access to the American mind in such a way as to nearly eliminate their role. The primary witness to turn states evidence against Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling was Andy Fastow (jewish) who worked closely with the largest holders of Enron stock, the Belfer family (jewish "holocaust survivors"). For more information on these facts, see Michael Collins Piper’s excellent book, The New Jerusalem. (source: Curt Maynard)

Open Letter to Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling

How does it feel? How does it feel to have your life turned upside down, to have the most precious commodity of all--your freedom--taken away? How does it feel to be hated? Without the slightest hesitation, you stole from my father and, therefore, my children and I; you took away a considerable amount of his security in his old age. You deceived him; you left him holding the bag. The funny thing is you did everything you possibly could have done to avoid the trials outcome: You bankrolled the Houston holocaust museum, Lay; your wife even .served on the museum’s Board of Directors. Both of you served as front men for the Jewish Belfer family--the real beneficiaries of the Enron collapse, whose patriarch Arthur Belfer allegedly survived the holocaust. What little regard they have for you now – you served your role as their Shabbas Goy – now, go away quietly.

Most Americans haven’t even heard of the Belfer family. The Jewish media has been absolutely focused on you two from the very beginning: Kenneth Lay this, and Jeffrey Skilling that. You sat back confident that your benefactors would pave the way for an acquittal. Well, surprise! They never intended that you be saved at the last minute. A scapegoat was needed, and you two fools filled the role nicely.

HAARETZ- [After a great deal of fuss and pressure…] “An Israeli official ..was able to confirm [that] Harvard’s Kennedy School decided to remove its logo from this paper, [with a] disclaimer warning readers that the views conveyed in the paper are of the authors alone. “Congressman Eliot Engel calling the authors “dishonest so-called intellectuals” and saying they are “entitled to their stupidity… the right of the rest of us to expose them for the anti-Semites they are.” It also reported this interesting nugget - … “Harvard, had received ’several calls’ from ‘pro-Israel donors’ expressing concern about the Walt-Mearsheimer paper. One of the angered contributors is said to be the donor who underwrote the chair occupied by Dean Walt, Robert Belfer. ” (Haaretz)

Although the collapse of oil industry giant Enronemerged as perhaps the 21 st century’s first majorfinancial and political scandal—with multiple connectionsto both the Democratic and Republican Parties—thevery central (and pivotal) Jewish connection to the Enronaffair has gone largely unnoticed. As we shall see, thereare some quite interesting aspects about the scandal thathave been kept out of the public arena. And in thisregard, the Enron scandal is very much an appropriateintroduction to our overall examination of Zionist powerin America.

Although the fact that Enron executive AndrewFastow—who was convicted, along with his wife, for hismisdeeds—was Jewish was mentioned in some media(with Fastow’s rabbi coming to his public defense) themuch bigger and more explosive Jewish connections surrounding Enron were almost uniformly covered up.

The Jewish role in Enron is indubitably illustrative ofhow the major media suppresses “the Jewish connection”in major affairs of this type and is worth reviewing here in our study of Jewish power in America.

The fact that some distinguished Jewish institutions (and not just big name politicians of both parties) wereon the receiving end of Enron’s “dirty money” was lost in the shuffle. Here’s a story (a revealing one) youwon’t read anywhere else.

While “everyone knows” that the now-infamous Enron Corporation was lining the campaign coffers of Democratic and Republican politicians alike, what wasnot reported in the major media is that the corruption- racked corporation and those behind it have also been major financial backers of the burgeoning Holocaust industry (and the Israeli lobby) in the United States and in Israel.

That’s right. While Kenneth Lay, the non-Jewishchairman of the Enron Corporation, was busy struggling to keep his employees (and investors) from finding outabout the sorry state of the giant enterprise, Lay andhis wife Linda (along with Enron itself) were bankrolling a so-called “Holocaust museum” in Houston, Texas.

In fact, according to the Jan. 18, 2002 issue of Forward, one of the most authoritative and respected Jewish newspapers in America, the Lays and Enron “donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Houston’s Holocaust museum, accounting for approximately 10% of the institution’s $3 million budget”.

The truth is that Kenneth and Linda Lay were soenmeshed with the museum that they were scheduledto serve as honorary co-chairs at the museum’s annualdinner in March of 2002. Mrs. Lay was actually amember of the museum’s board.

For its own part, the crowd at the museumprotested that they knew nothing about Enron’sbusiness dealings, which is probably true, but thequestion remains as to whether angry Enron investorsand employees will start demanding that the museumreturn the “dirty money” siphoned off throughcontributions from Enron. But the Enron connectionto the Holocaust industry is even bigger and muchhigher reaching than this.

While the media still portrays Enron as some sortof “Texas cowboy” enterprise, the truth is that a little-known, but extraordinarily wealthy, billionaire Jewishfamily based in New York were major figures behindEnron and also prime financial backers behind activitiesat the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.

Although Enron’s chairman, Kenneth Lay, hasbeen the focus of the media spotlight, evidence demonstrates that Enron is largely the fiefdom of theheirs of the late Arthur Belfer, a Polish-born immigrantoften described as a “Holocaust survivor”, despite thefact that Belfer left Poland in 1939. Belfer started out as a pillow importer, then began dealing in lucrativecontracts for sleeping bags supplied to the U.S. armedforces. He then branched out into the oil business and established Belco Petroleum as one of the largest industrial companies in the nation.

Critics of media coverage of Enron have notedthat although articles buried in the Dec. 5, 2001business sections of both The Wall Street Journal andthe New York Times outlined the Belfer connection toEnron, subsequently the Belfer name has beenrelegated to the background, with functionary KennethLay—essentially a “hired gun” for the Belfer family—being the scapegoat in the Enron disaster.

While the Belfer name was never mentioned oncein a major Newsweek story purporting to tell the whole tragic Enron story, it just so happens that Belfer’s heirs were (at the time the scandal erupted) majorstakeholders in Enron, dating back to the 1983 sale byArthur Belfer of his Belco Petroleum Corp. to Enron’spredecessor.

Although Belfer died in 1993, the Belfer family’s foundation (enriched by the company’s now-controversial Enron holdings) has been funding a regularly convened “Arthur and Rochelle BelferNational Conference for Educators” held with much fanfare at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum inWashington, D.C.

Two such conferences were slated for 2002.Middle- and high-school teachers from across thecountry who specialize in “Holocaust education” arebrought by the Belfer endowment to the museum inWashington where they are trained in the process ofindoctrinating school students in the lore and legend of “the Holocaust”.

What cannot be denied—despite the media’s decision to sweep the Belfer name under the rug—isthat the names “Enron” and “Belfer” are practicallyindistinguishable.

No “disinterested party” by any means, Arthur Belfer’s son, Robert Belfer, served on Enron’s boardof directors but also, more notably, on its three-manexecutive committee, along with Lay. While the mediahas cast Robert Belfer off to the sidelines, it is beyond reason to suggest that he had no knowledge of thecompany’s sorry state of affairs.

The public record shows that Belfer money hasalso been widely distributed to Jewish causes in theUnited States and Israel. Robert Belfer was recentlyelected chair of the board of overseers of the AlbertEinstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University inNew York of which he and his wife Renee have longbeen financial benefactors. Belfer also serves on theboard of the Israeli-based Weizmann Institute ofScience (a driving force behind Israel’s secret nuclearweapons development program) and of the AmericanJewish Committee, one of the most influential powerblocs in the Israeli lobby in America.

Mrs. Belfer is also a trustee of the AmericanFriends of the Israel Museum. The Belfers’ moneygiving reaches far and wide: they are also contributorsto Thanks to Scandinavia, a venture that honorsScandinavians who fought against the Axis powersduring World War II.

Some have suggested that because of the intimateties of the Belfer/Enron empire to the Holocaustindustry and the Israeli lobby the major media hasmade a conscious decision to effectively “divorce” theBelfer name from the Enron scandal in order to sparethe distinguished Holocaust industry and the Israelilobby any embarrassment.

While it appears that Belfer and his family havesuffered major losses in the Enron debacle, The WallStreet Journal assured its readers that the family “hasn’tbeen wiped out financially”. Selma Ruben, Belfer’ssister, is married to Lawrence Ruben, an immenselywealthy New York real estate developer. Another sister,Anita, recently died. Her heirs are reported to have lostvast sums of money in the Enron affair.

So while the major media is hyping the entirelyirrelevant question as to whether Republican politiciansor Democratic politicians (or both) are somehowresponsible for the collapse of Enron, the Belfer family(and those in the Holocaust industry and Israel-relatedcauses who have thrived on Enron’s largess) areescaping the focus of public attention.

Considering the connections of Enron, it may thus be no coincidence that two of the primarycongressional figures who are being touted by the media as “investigators” of Enron are Rep. HenryWaxman (D-Calif.) and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.), two lawmakers known as strong supporters ofIsrael’s cause.

Thus, from this brief overview of the now-infamous Enron scandal, which has been the subject ofmassive media coverage, we see that there has indeedbeen a hidden “Jewish connection” that has been ignored in the major broadcast and published media inthis country.

The final results of the Enron affair are yet to beseen, of course, but the very fact that there has beenthis little-known Jewish connection that has beenignored or deliberately suppressed is a very tellingindicator that Zionist power in America is so immensethat such a Jewish connection remains under wraps.

In his previously mentioned book, The FatalEmbrace, Jewish American Professor BenjaminGinsberg wrote candidly and forthrightly about thefrequency with which one has found a “Jewishconnection” in a number of major American politicalscandals, ranging from the legendary Credit Mobilieraffair of the 19 th century to the geopolitical andfinancial intrigues surrounding the construction of thePanama Canal—not to mention a host of other suchevents that have become part of American history.

And all of this is not to disregard the verydefinitive role that Jewish families in the UnitedStates—and worldwide—played in the massive trans-Atlantic trade in African slaves, a point widely disputedby Jewish organizations and the mass media butthoroughly documented, beyond any question, in thelandmark work, The Secret Relationship BetweenBlacks and Jews, issued by Minister LouisFarrakhan’s Nation of Islam. Of course, while the word “scandal” is notgenerally applied, although it should be, there is also noquestion that Zionist influence played a substantial rolein the promotion of the outrageous lies told by theadministration of George W. Bush in promoting theAmerican invasion of Iraq in the spring of 2003, on thevery eve of the Jewish holiday of Purim, at which timethe Jews celebrate the destruction of their enemies, amost unpleasant type of celebration by any normalstandards. Nonetheless, the patently false claims aboutentirely non-existent weapons of mass destructionmade by Young Bush and his Jewish advisors, such asPaul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith and Richard Perle—andpromoted in the media by such Zionist hardliners asWilliam Kristol—were a blatant fraud on theAmerican people (and the world). Yet, it is highly unlikely that these guilty parties—Zionists all, Jewish-and non-Jewish alike—will ever bebrought before a tribunal and prosecuted for thesevery real war crimes. And that is the sad reality of what happens whenZionist power has become so immense that theinterests of the Zionist movement are thoroughly co-mingled with the affairs of a nation, resulting in ahigh-handed and quite blatant institutional corruption—and a prevailing lack of moral principle—that governsin high places today. The fact is that there are few—if any—limits on Zionist power in America. While there are no laws demanding the prosecutionand punishment of public officials who tell lies whenthey are not under oath (which is, unfortunately, mostof the time), perhaps there should be. The bottom lineis that Zionism has played a major part in some of themost outrageous—and profitable—rackets of our day. However, another scandal of recent Americanhistory, one certainly worth reviewing, provides a bleakdemonstration, in the most specific sense, of howZionist power has infiltrated and manipulated thehighest ranks of our nation’s law enforcement: theU.S. Justice Department and the federal court system. This is the INSLAW affair, the next topic ofexamination in our review of Zionist power in America.

A Word From Sgt. Raymond Turner, USA

"If I were the 'Stalin of America' most of our govt and media would be shot for treason or sent off to a FEMA camp or put to work on infrastructure projects. AIPAC and the Rothschild’s Federal Reserve would be no more. The debt would be erased over night. Lobbies and all political donations outlawed. MOSSAD agents in America would be shot on sight. And if Israel didn’t like it, some of our 81 nuclear attack subs and 11 carriers would finally be put to good use.John Hagee would simply be put on a starvation diet. Pam Geller sent to a concubinage in Saudi Arabia. Alan Dershowitz and Joe Lieberman parachuted into Afghanistan wearing IDF officer’s uniforms and MOSSAD ID. George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld taken to Nevada and tied feet-first to wild stallions. Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh cast adrift on a life raft in the western Atlantic at 20 degrees north in the middle of Hurricane season. The entire lot of neo-cons involved in 9-11 would be loaded onto a remote control jet with just enough fuel to make it 500 miles off the east coast at 30,000′. These are only a few of the just ends for the traitorous agents of Israel.This country would be cleaned up in short order."Sgt. Raymond Turner, USA