I think this graphic nicely captures the problem facing the Marxist-driven Labour party. As you can see, its MEMBERS (£5 a go!) OPPOSE military action to the tune of 75% whereas ONLY 13% OF the British public (including Labour voters) oppose military action. Therein lies the seeds of Labour’s looming annihilation. It patently does not represent the views of the vast majority of voters, including its own! Instead, it has a base of around 300,000 radical baby marxists who have elevated Corbyn into this position of power from which he posits opinions that are at the fringe of political life.

“The daunting prospect of millions of Turks moving to Britain arose after EU leaders tabled a deal in exchange for help stemming the flood of migrants into Europe. They are offering the huge country £2billion in cash, visa-free travel for its citizens and speeded up membership talks if it clamps down on people trafficking and migration across its borders.”

That would mean around 75MILLION Muslims would swell European ranks. It would mean that this new Europe would number 120 Million out of a total population of around 580m. Not far off approaching a fifth and – needless to say, the fastest growing! If you think Europe has a muslim issue at the moment, just wait until this latest insanity impacts. The EU seem intent to turn Europe into Eurabia. As the Minarets spring up across the EU, and the cries of Allahu Akhbar become more common, we must wonder WHY cultural immolation is deemed a worthy objective?

Police are investigating after ‘fat-shaming’ leaflets were handed to women on the Tube. The fliers, for an unlisted company called Overweight Haters limited, condemn people who consume an “enormous amount of food resources” while “half the world starves”. It is not yet known who is behind the leaflets.

Well then, whilst I think they DO have a half a point, the language is intemperate and it is wrong to hate anyone! Yes, fatties do need to back off the vast amounts of food they consumer and yes, gluttony IS an issue that causes huge cost to our useless socialised NHS, BUT it’s not right to be offensive! Finally, have Police REALLY got nothing better to do than “investigate” those handing it out???

Here is senior Labour spokesperson Diane Abbott speaking earlier on the subject of whether Labour MP’s should have a “free vote” on whether the UK should join in the aerial assault on Islamic State in Syria.

JUST three of nearly 400 Islamic State jihadists who have returned to Britain from Syria are being strictly monitored, it has been revealed. Those branded potential terrorists can be tagged and forced to obey curfews, report to police and accept restrictions on who they meet. But only three orders are in force despite the return of more than half of the 750 would-be jihadists who quit Britain to join Isis.

It’s as if we have a national death wish. In the first instance we should NEVER have allowed these killers back into the UK and the least we can do is arrest them and ensure they have no opportunity to kill.

I have revised my position on whether or not the UK should join in the bombing of IS in Syria. I think we SHOULD do so but only when those Muslim countries with armies and airforces in the region all join in the initial onslaught. Then, all those “Syrians” of fighting age spreading out across Europe should be sent back to Syria to help the battle. Next, we should target and destroy IS in…the UK. Government tells us that at least 400 of them has returned from Syria. Finally, when all the above has happened … we bomb what is left. Clear?

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

Copyright & copy; 2010 A Tangled Web (All rights reserved).Comments on articles here are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of A Tangled Web or David Vance. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise unacceptable may be deleted by the Editor. However the fact a particular comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by David Vance of the views expressed therein.