For years now the myth that vaccines can
eradicate illnesses has existed. This myth was perpetrated by the pharmaceutical
industries and backed up by our governments and has existed purely to trick the
general public into having countless vaccines in the ruse that they will live
long and healthy lives. I want to examine the facts and attempt to dispel the
myth and prove that vaccines cannot and will not eradicate illnesses because
many are caused by viruses which can mutate as we have seen with the flu virus,
thus rendering the vaccines against it, useless.

I will begin by asking the question - If
vaccines eradicate illnesses, then why do they still exist today? The word
eradicate according to many dictionaries, means to eliminate, to wipe out,
obliterate. So taking these definitions into account have any of the illnesses
we vaccinate against today been truly eradicated from our world? The plain and
simple answer to this question is no they have not.

To examine this properly, we have to see if
anything has ever been truly eradicated with vaccines, if so, then no child
would ever get these illnesses because they would no longer exist.

On

Vaccinate Your Baby : History of Disease
Eradication
the first paragraph states-

“Immunization is one of the most successful
public health achievements of the 20th century. Due to systematic vaccination
programs, smallpox has been eliminated worldwide, and cases of polio, measles,
diphtheria and Hib are at all-time lows. The burden of other diseases has been
significantly reduced .”

Is what they are saying true? The WHO say it is,
on their website

WHO | Immunization against diseases of public health
importance
they say :-

“Immunization is a proven tool for controlling
and even eradicating disease. An immunization campaign carried out by the World
Health Organization (WHO) from 1967 to 1977 eradicated the natural occurrence of
smallpox. When the programme began, the disease still threatened 60% of the
world's population and killed every fourth victim. Eradication of poliomyelitis
is within reach. Since the launch by WHO and its partners of the Global Polio
Eradication Initiative in 1988, infections have fallen by 99%, and some five
million people have escaped paralysis. Between 1999 and 2003, measles deaths
dropped worldwide by almost 40%, and some regions have set a target of
eliminating the disease. Maternal and neonatal tetanus will soon be eliminated
in 14 of 57 high-risk countries.”

Significantly reduced perhaps but has any
disease or illness been eradicated? Let us take a look.

According to some doctors Smallpox has been seen
to still exist even though the world has been told that vaccines have eradicated
it. According to Dr Kris Gaublomme, it has simply been renamed and is now called
Monkeypox. In his article

Has smallpox really disappeared from the
earth?------Dr. Kris Gaublomme
he explains:-

“A new
and embarrassing development was the resurgence of pox-family viruses in Africa,
known as the ‘monkeypox’. This fact has been known for many years but the public
was reassured that this had nothing to do with smallpox and that the human
species was safe.

Not as safe as we were told,though, since in the
Congo in 1970, pox viruses were isolated from humans2 corresponding to the pox
viruses found in captive monkeys in 1958 and identified the next year (3). It
was baptised ‘monkeypox~. The same virus was isolated from 6 humans in 1959 by
Foster. In 1976, Gipsen reported on more cases in Nigeria (4).

The terminology of the disease became ever more
confusing, since what were at first simply ‘monkeypox’ are now introduced into
literature as‘human monkeypox’. What, now, is the difference between smallpox
and ‘human monkeypox’? It is interesting to read in a recent article in the
Lancet that "Human monkeypox is a systemic exanthem, resembling smallpox, that
occurs as a sporadic zoonosis in rural rainforest villages of western and
central Africa. The disease is caused by an orthopoxvirus, which is transmitted
to human beings by handling infected animals; serosurveys have implicated
squirrels ... as the probable reservoir. Secondary human-to-human spread by
aerosol or direct contact accounts for about 28% of cases..." (my emphasis)

So, let us make a simple addition. This virus is
an ‘orthopox’ virus, which means, literally translated, a ‘real pox’ virus. This
virus spreads among humans causing an exanthem ‘resembling’ smallpox, and
causing disease and death among the infected (between February and August 1996,
71 cases were notified in the Katako-Kombe area in Zaire, 6 of which 4 died from
the disease (5)”.

From his report in Atlanta Reuters (WS) via
Individual Inc December 15, 1997

Monkeypox outbreak in Africa biggest ever -
U.S. we
see that humans can catch monkeypox and die from it.

“The
largest outbreak of human monkeypox ever reported has caused more than 500
people to become ill in the Democratic Republic of Congo, health officials said
Thursday.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) said children 16 and under accounted for 85 percent of the 511 human
monkeypox cases that have occurred in the former Zaire since February 1996.

The CDC said it was the largest human monkeypox
outbreak ever recorded. Five deaths were recorded, all of them of children aged
between 4 and 8.

Monkeypox is a sister virus of smallpox and is
generally spread by squirrels and monkeys in the rain forests of western and
central Africa. Before the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, cases
of monkeypox in humans were rare.”

So is smallpox really history or is Monkeypox
really Smallpox?

Well the article in the Lancet mentioned above,
by Dr Gaubloome, according to the Vaccination Information site

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/smallpox1.html
says:-

"A pilgrim returned home to Yugoslavia from
Mecca in February, 1972, with a fever… In the 4 weeks since the pilgrim first
had his fever, 150 people were infected across the country. It took 4 weeks
before doctors, nurses, and health authorities knew they were dealing with
smallpox… 175 people contracted smallpox [thereafter] and 35 died… these events
occurred in a well-vaccinated population."

Dr. Vivian Virginia Vetrano says in her article

Smallpox:-

“The authorities claim that we will be safe
from terrorists attacks using the pox virus because there are adequate
stockpiles of cultivated smallpox viruses in Russia and in the USA to make most
all the vaccines "needed."

It is claimed by medical historians that the
vaccination process wiped out smallpox throughout the world. However, the truth
is that compulsory vaccination was abandoned because more deaths were caused by
the vaccinations than there were cases of smallpox. A slight of the hand trick
was used to foster the claim that smallpox was eradicated by the vaccination
practice. Everyone who had beenvaccinated and who developed smallpox
was diagnosed as having chicken pox!

The doctors who were interviewed on recent
television shows admit that the vaccine may cause many serious side-effects and
that a certain number of persons will develop painful and sometimes lethal
sequelae. Yet, they advise that it is better to take the chance and be
vaccinated in spite of these dangers.”

So have we all been party to an elaborate hoax,
has Smallpox existed all along and we have had the wool pulled over our eyes by
our governments and the drug companies to push vaccines? Well it is certainly a
possibility.

Bearing this in mind, let us now examine other
illnesses, how well are vaccines doing in eradicating these? Not too well it
seems.

The whooping cough or the pertussis infection
which is a an infection involving the respiratory tract and is caused by the

bacteriumBordetella pertussis
. This is a highly contagious illness known to last for a duration of
approximately 6 weeks before subsiding. The disease derives its name from the
"whoop" sound made from the inspiration of air after a cough. Although many
medical sources describe the whoop as "high-pitched", this is generally the case
with infected babies and children only, not adults. On occasions a child may
vomit after a bout of severe coughing.

The first vaccine to combat this infection was
brought out in 1930's and was given as part of the triple vaccine the DTP.

In 1991, DTaP vaccine was licensed in the United States. The pertussis
component of this vaccine is a more purified "acellular" version, which produces
fewer side effects as the original vaccine was identified as having a high rate
of side effects which included brain injury and even death.

Harold Stearley said this about the DTP vaccine in an article -

(4/18/97) The Tainted History of the DPT Vaccine

“There's no question that DPT vaccinations save lives; they have lowered the
annual pertussis deaths from about 1000 annually to less than ten.
Unfortunately, as reported by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC),
the form of the vaccine used and sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control
also kills as many as 900 children per year, and leaves one of every 62,000
children immunized with permanent brain damage.”

This makes me wonder if we are swapping one problem for another and if
vaccination has been proven not to completely eradicate Smallpox, then do the
risks of the vaccines outweigh it's benefits?

Professor Gordon Stewart an M.D and a Emeritus professor of Public Health
wrote much on this in his extensive range of papers on the subject. He certainly
felt that there were extremely worrying side effects linked to this vaccine and
this included death.

In the article

The lies the
Government tell when it comes to vaccines
written by myself, I have detailed his work along with an expose of a few of his
extremely worrying letters written to the UK Government, proving concern about
this vaccine, existed, as early as the 70's and 80's.

What Professor Stewart was saying and the vast majority of media reports that
appeared at the time on the side effects of this vaccine, was worrying many
parents and so in 2005, two new tetanus toxoid-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap)
vaccines were licensed. These vaccines are the first acellular pertussis-containing
vaccines and made it possible to vaccinate adolescents and adults against
pertussis.

So if these vaccines have been so effective, then why are so many children
still being infected today, whether they are vaccinated or unvaccinated?

Dr Mercola says in his article on the 15th July 2010

Whooping Cough Kills 5 in California
the following:-

“After the deaths of five infants, California health
authorities have declared an epidemic of whooping cough, also known as pertussis.

The announcement came after authorities
noticed a sharp spike in reports of pertussis, which often is mistaken for a
cold or the flu and is highly contagious.

A CDC study suggests that the
resurgence of whooping cough is due to the vaccine causing an increased and more
virulent toxin”

Of course many scientists and the pharmaceutical industry
would argue that this was because not every person has been vaccinated and that
if they had, then this disease would no longer exist. However, this simply is
untrue because VACCINATED people are still getting the infection?

In July 2006 a whole year after the latest vaccine promising
to keep children safe from this infection and three decades after the original
whooping cough vaccine was introduced, the Sunday Times journalist Nigel Hawkes
the Health Editor wrote an extremely alarming article called

Whooping cough still infecting millions of vaccinated
children …which began-

“MILLIONS of British children have probably been infected with
whooping cough even though they have been immunised against it.

A study has found that nearly two in
five children who went to their GP with a persistent cough had suffered from
whooping cough, though very few doctors diagnose it. The results suggest that
the whooping cough vaccine is ineffective at preventing infection, but makes
symptoms less severe — thereby concealing just how common it remains”

.

Nigel quoted a BMJ study saying:-

“In BMJ online, a team from the
University of Oxford, the University of Auckland in New Zealand and the Health
Protection Agency report that in 85.9per cent of the cases they saw, the
children had been vaccinated. But blood samples tested positive for antibodies
to Bordetella pertussis, the cause of whooping cough, indicating recent
infection.

The team studied 172 children aged 5-16
who visited their family doctor with a cough lasting 14 days or more.
Immunisation records were checked, notes made on the symptoms and duration of
cough, and blood samples taken for testing. They found that 37.2 per cent of the
children had evidence of a recent pertussis infection. The results suggest that
the condition is “endemic among younger school-age children”, they say, and that
doctors should consider a diagnosis of whooping cough even if the child has been
immunised.”

So if this study is correct and one
presumes that it is, especially as it was allowed to be reported in the BMJ, a
massive proportion of the children who had been vaccinated still went on to
contract the illness, thus proving that whooping cough has not been eradicated
even for those children who have had the vaccine. This renders this vaccine as
somewhat useless in my eyes.

In an article by Barbara Loe Fisher
National -Vaccine Information Center she gives a possible explanation:-

NVIC
Vaccine News - Whooping Cough Outbreaks & Vaccine Failures

“Pertussis vaccination rates are very
high in the U.S. According to the CDC, 84 percent of children under age three
have received four DTaP shots.

17
By the time American children enter kindergarten nearly every child has gotten
all the CDC recommended pertussis shots.18
In 2009, the CDC said that the proportion of totally unvaccinated children in
America is only six hundredths of one percent (0.06).19

Even with super high pertussis vaccine
coverage in America and other countries like the Netherlands, Australia, Finland
and Canada, whooping cough disease cannot be prevented.

20
There are two main reasons for this fact.

First, pertussis vaccines widely used
since the 1950’s have not prevented whooping cough disease from circulating in
vaccinated populations. Unknown numbers of children and adults, who have gotten
all government recommended pertussis shots, can and do develop whooping cough or
are carriers without symptoms.

21,22

Because pertussis vaccine immunity is
only temporary and does not last, health officials are now telling teenagers and
adults to get more booster shots.

23
But that is not going to matter if scientific evidence that B. pertussis
organisms have mutated and become vaccine-resistant turns out to be correct.24

A second important reason is that
another Bordetella organism – parapertussis – also can cause whooping cough.

25
B. parapertussis symptoms, while often milder, can look exactly like B.
pertussis. But doctors rarely recognize or test for parapertussis.26
And there is NO vaccine for parapertussis.”

I am now going to look at how effective
the Measles vaccine has been in eradicating the Measles virus.

The Measles vaccine first became available in 1963. An
improved measles vaccine became available in 1968 and then later in 1971 a
combination measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine became available.

Unlike the Whooping Cough the Measles is a virus and is caused
by

paramyxovirus
and is the most unpleasant and the most dangerous of the children's diseases.

Measles has some very serious side effects and it is these
side effects that worry doctors the most and include these taken from NHS
website-

· bronchitis and croup (infection of the airways), characterised by a hacking
or barking cough, and

· squint,if the virus affects the nerves and muscles of the eye.

· serious eye disorders, such as an infection of the optic nerve (the nerve
that transmits information from the eye to the brain), known as optic neuritis,
which can lead to blindness,

· heart and nervous system problems,

· serious brain complication known as subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE),
which can sometimes occur several years after measles. Although the condition is
fatal, it is very rare, occurring in only 1 in every 100,000 cases of measles.

So how is the measles vaccination doing
in eradicating the measles virus? Again let us examine the vaccinated children.
Well, according to recent reports this vaccine also can not guarantee that if a
child is vaccinated they will not get the measles infection.

“FACT.
Vaccinated children still get
measles. Deaths and hospitalisations have been recorded for 120 years. The
measles death decline graph provided shows that the measles vaccine had nothing
to do with the decline in deaths, and has not affected the number of children
hospitalised during epidemic years since its introduction. (Appendices to
Parliamentary Journals, Official Year Book, Health Department publications such
has "Health Trends" and Immunisation Handbook. Also, graphs provided to Herald
and Metro in the past)

PARENTS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THAT,”

She goes on to then state some very
worrying and proven facts

“*** A similar campaign vaccinating 7.1
million schoolchildren in England has resulted in a legal firm called Dawbarns (dawbarns
@paston.co.uk) (0044 1553 764373) taking legal action against the British Health
Department on behalf of the following cases:

*** The childrens' doctors and specialists have come out in the media in support
of the children

*** The New Zealand, and British Health Departments deny the existence of these
cases. (NZ H Dept media release, and BMJ article) and maintain that OPERATION
SAFEGUARD eliminated measles from UK. In October 1996, UK started another MMR
booster campaign.

**** Deaths from Measles were virtually wiped out in every <developed country
before the vaccine was even used.(See disease decline graph

*** Using the Health Department
statistics on vaccinating 540,000 children, would result in:

Up to 81,000 cases of rash and fever.

Up to 5,400 cases of parotid (mumps) swelling

Up to 216 cases of febrile seizures

Up to 18 cases of thrombocytopenia (red-blood cell destruction)

Up to cases of chronic thrombocytopenia.

Up to 5 cases of Aseptic Meningitis.

Up to 1 case of Central Nervous system damage.

Up to 15,420 cases of transient joint arthralgia some of these becoming chronic.
(pg 95, H. Dept Handbook)

*** Germany does not routinely use the measles vaccine because their reporting
system found 1 per 2,500 vaccinees had a neurological complication, and 1 per
17,500 vaccinees had abortive encephalopathy. (FDA Technical Report, 1980)

The Germans considered the risks too high in light of the fact that deaths and
disease severity had decreased without any reference to a vaccine. * THE SAME IS
TRUE OF NEW ZEALAND, but parents are not told that.

*** That in the pre vaccine era, mothers' antibodies protected babies for around
15 months, measles was mainly an infection of 5 - 9 year olds, and by 15 yrs,
99% had antibodies. By 1985, 14 % of 15 year olds lacked antibody.( NZ Med J. 27
May, 1987) No-one knows what the level is now, but evidence from America shows
that adult measles, which can be very serious, is now quite common.

*** that vaccinated mothers cannot give protective antibodies to their babies,
so that young babies, for whom measles is serious are no longer protected.
(Washington Post, Sun Nov 22, 1992, and others)

"** that in the 1991 USA measles outbreak, over half the deaths were vaccinated,
and most deaths were in immunocompromised people. (Washington Post June 14,
1991, BMJ, 11 May, 1991)

*** that New Zealand doctors and hospitals do not prescribe or use Vitamin A for
measles, and as a result, many cases are far more serious than they should be.

"** that in Africa, children who have a natural measles infection have half the
asthma, allergies and eczema compared with their vaccinated peers. (Lancet, June
29, 1996)

*** that if children with mild to moderate psoriasis get a natural dose of
measles, the psoriasis is often cured. (3 med studies)

*** that babies vaccinated who have maternal antibodies, or people who have
measles suppressed with gammaglobulin go on to have a higher rate of
immunoreactive diseases, sebaceous skin diseases, degenerative cartilage and
bone disease and certain tumours. (Lancet, 5 Jan 1985) If you revaccinate
children who already have antibodies what will happen to them in later life?

*** that you have the right to take home the PRODUCT INSERT, and read it
carefully before you make any decision".

Scary isn't it? However she is not
alone in her findings.

In the Indian Journal of Science a
study was carried out and reported by Munesh K Sharma, Vikas Bhatia, HM Swami.

Outbreak of measles amongst vaccinated
children in a slum of ...

The abstract of this study says;-

“BACKGROUND: An outbreak of measles was
reported from a slum, UT, Chandigarh in April 2003. Similar outbreak was also
reported in less than three years from the same and adjoining areas. The present
study was conducted to investigate and assess various epidemiological features
associated with measles outbreak. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three cases of measles
were admitted in Deptt. of Paediatrics, Govt. Medical College & Hospital,
Chandigarh and were reported to the Deptt. of Community Medicine for an outbreak
investigation. A trained team investigated the slum having a population of
25,000 and studied various features associated with epidemic between the period
of April 22 to May 10, 2003. RESULTS: The study covered 484 houses having 1130
children. Among the children who developed measles 32.76% were vaccinated ones.
In them attack rate was 3%. Attack rate in vaccinated children went on
increasing as age increased. An overall attack rate of 5.13% (Peak incidence 6%
in 1-4 years age group) was recorded. Among measles cases, one-fifth had post
measles complications. As much as 32.76% children with measles had received
measles vaccination in the past. Therefore something more than immunization by
single dose of vaccine is required. Measles was reported to be higher amongst
the children without Vitamin A supplementation (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is
need to store vaccine properly and to strengthen routine immunization coverage,
Vitamin A supplementation and health infrastructure in underprivileged
population. Serological studies among vaccinated children against measles should
be undertaken to explore the possibility of second dose of measles in older
children.”

Measles in
Previously Vaccinated Children
they came to the conclusion that the measles vaccine was failing to protect
children against measles, as in this study they also found cases of vaccinated
children who contracted measles.

“Investigation of 37 cases of measles in an Alabama elementary
school revealed that 25 patients (68%) had been vaccinated, suggesting measles
vaccine failure. Attack rates based on a measles history and immunization survey
indicated that 16.2% (six of 37) of measles susceptibles who responded acquired
disease compared with only 4.0% (20 of 505) of vaccinated respondents. Analysis
showed that 17.6% (12 of 68) of children vaccinated at less than 12 months of
age contracted measles compared with only 1.9% (eight of 419) of those
vaccinated at 12 or more months of age. It is inferred that vaccination at less
than 1 year of age may not be effective, because maternal antibody may persist
and interfere with immune response to vaccine virus. This would explain the
higher incidence in this epidemic of measles among children vaccinated as
infants.”

If the conclusion that they came to was
correct and

that vaccination at
less than 1 year of age may not be effective, because maternal antibody may
persist and interfere with immune response to vaccine virus then surely
this would indicate that the maternal antibody may have been enough to protect
these infants and that the vaccine was counteracting a normal antibody passed
from mother to infant.

One thing that is for certain it seems that at what ever age a
child is given a vaccine it does not protect them from this illness and
certainly vaccines have done very little to eradicate illnesses as we can
clearly see.

I believe it is time that the world woke up to the fact that
vaccinate or not, these illnesses are here to stay and the only thing that is
being eradicated is the public's confidence in vaccinations.