Just in case it was missed, what I am saying is petty theft costs
noisebridge less than petty drama.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Corey McGuire <coreyfro at coreyfro.com>wrote:
> This is stupid, just saying.
>> Isn't there, like, a meeting, like, tomorrow, like, where, like, shit can,
> like, get, like discussed?
>> How many security professionals are on the Noisebridge roster? Can anyone
> tell me how hard it would be to take money from the till when noone is
> watching? Does that take a degree in network forensics? I suspect anyone
> who has been accused of sleeping overnight would have pleanty of time to
> take while noone is watching, so I suspect there is a mundane reason for
> what was seen.
>> I am making this evaluation from only reading Alex's post.
>> I actually can't place names to faces, here, so I can't take sides based on
> personal relations. All I see is petty accusations and drama. This looks
> like a grudge and not a grievance.
>> And it is now on public records for all the world to see, including people
> with money who would like to pay for a drama free hackspace. People also
> unaware of who any of you are. Now they are worried about drama and the
> security of their donations. Good job.
>> Why not take this up in a forum of people motivated enough by Noisebridge's
> Health to show up for a meeting and discuss it's future?
>> Just saying.
>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Rigel Christian <rigelc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Patrick Keys <citizenkeys at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> > I have no need to steal.
>>>> Lots of people who steal don't actually need to steal. So it doesnt
>> exactly work all that well as a denial.
>>>> just sayin.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>>https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>>>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20110103/056fb768/attachment.htm