Andhra police to arrest Owaisi for hate speech

Director general of police V Dinesh Reddy told media that summons had been issued to Akbaruddin Owaisi , who is in London for treatment. "If necessary, we will take the help of Interpol to arrest him. Cases have been registered against him at Bodhan and Nirmal under Sections 121 (Waging or attempting to wage war, or abetting waging of war, against the Government of India) and Section 153(A) (creating enmity between different communities) of the Indian Penal Code," he said.

Click to expand...

Another petition filed by a lawyer Kashimshetty Karuna Sagar against Owaisi for his hate speech at Nirmal is also being investigated into by the court. In his petition, he asked the court to direct the police to register a case against Owaisi under Section 295A (for deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings or any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs), Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion) and other relevant sections of the IPC. The lawyer has also claimed that he has received threats ever since he filed the complaint.

Click to expand...

Sec 121 ?? Good..This is turning out to be a water tight case..If people did not know Sec 121 was also used against Kasab.

P.S: Congrats to social media especially Twitter by keeping the pressure on and forcing the Govt/courts to act.

Did he have a valid visa to take off so quickly? Is he entitled to a diplomatic passport? If he does not return, his passport should be revoked immediately. Well he should not return on his own. That will show the people who were cheering him that he is a coward. India should then put an extradition request with Britain,

He is suffering from which disease that he has to go to London for treatment?
Almost all kinds of medical services are available here in India. Then what is the need of going to London.
I presume he has left when he saw that Govt action is inevitable and Tiger chickened out and left to never return back.

He is suffering from which disease that he has to go to London for treatment?
Almost all kinds of medical services are available here in India. Then what is the need of going to London.
I presume he has left when he saw that Govt action is inevitable and Tiger chickened out and left to never return back.

Click to expand...

I think there might be some truth in his london journey..he was attacked once by a local dada called Mohammed Pehelwan in a land dispute and he was shot at by that guy..

Telugu people fondly refer to PVN as â€˜Telugu biddaâ€™ (son of Telugu land). Insulting remarks like â€˜Telugu bidda, tiddaâ€™ were greeted by the crowd with cheers.

Then he used terms like katil, darinda, beimaan, dhokebaaz, chor etc. for an ex Prime Minister who had just passed away. No one uses words like thief, murderer, cheat etc. even for the head of an enemy state. This was happening when the funeral had just happened and the Assembly was offering condolences. Such was the respect for the only PM of India from the State where the Owaisis were born.

The worst was yet to come: â€œAccha hua ye mar gaya. Agar zinda hota to hazrat tho hum apne haaton se usko maar daalteâ€ . Essentially, what Akbar Owaisi said was that if the former PM had not died, he would have murdered him with his own hands! And this was a statement in the Assembly of Andhra Pradesh!

He is referring, in a very derogatory way, to the police force of Andhra Pradesh as an â€˜army of impotent peopleâ€™. Then he incites his audience, asking the CM to remove police and see who has more â€˜courageâ€™.

â€œUnme himmat nahin hain.. Musalmaano se muqable karne ki.â€

Again he says, â€˜theyâ€™ do not have â€˜courageâ€™ to fight Muslims. Whether he is referring to Hindus or the police force is not clear.

Talking about 50,000 riots in India over the 65 years since the country became independent, he says the majority of throats cut belonged to Muslims. The tone and delivery of his speech, whether factual or not, is to create a sense of victimhood by taking one-sided numbers.

Owaisi asks, â€œMy question now is: Where all did Ramâ€™s mother go wandering and where did she give birth to him? (high-pitched, derogatory, and received with loud cheers demeaning Lord Sri Ramaâ€™s mother and Ramaâ€™s birth)

Owaisi keeps referring toâ€œTareeq of sar zameen e Dakkanâ€ or history of Deccan, but limits it only to 400 years. Similar to how Pakistanis limit their history to only after the Arab invasion of India. Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra have thousands of years of glorious history in Deccan, which is not touched upon.

He talks about the post-independence period when â€˜lakhsâ€™ of Muslims were killed. No one knows how factual his one-sided â€˜historyâ€™ is, but the intention to create a sense of victimhood is only too evident.

==========================

Speech 9: This was in 1996, way before 2002, and still similar language:

As you can see, even before the riots that happened in Gujarat in 2002, he used language suggesting that a Muslim is â€˜forcedâ€™ to take â€˜revengeâ€™ using events from the 1990s. The trend is always to create victimhood, no matter which decade it is.

Again a very insulting tone about non-Muslims of India. Calling them impotent people who canâ€™t â€˜fightâ€™ Muslims. Maybe referring to Police again as the â€˜army of impotentâ€™ like an earlier speech.