What he is doing is town hall meetings and these are highly moderated. People submit questions or suggestions very early in writing and all of them are filtered out and few get to speak. In a democracy of 1B you cannot even walk into movie theater without planning.

__________________
Fair use is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test.

So the dots seem to be connecting now. Some blokes in BJP put up Kiran Bedi and wanted to leverage this anti corruption sentiment. The Cong not to be undone, put up Kejriwal. Now this guy is chipping away Modi's most precious asset - bytes in news and social media.

chale- aage aage dekhe hota hai kya.

The problem for Kejriwal is that once he has been associated with the Congress, his political credentials will get severely dented. Kejriwal shot himself in his foot by taking Congi support. Please do not confuse media hype with voter sensibilities on the ground. The people know on which side the media is buttered on. Just as they seen through the Congress, so they have seen through Kejriwal too.

Kejriwal done a huge favor to Modi by enabling people to realize the hollowness of the AAP. Next elections in Delhi, the AAP will only eat into the Congress votes, not the BJP's. Next elections voters sick of the Congress will not make the mistake of voting for the AAP again.

Since one cannot find a hook to latch on.. anything will do.. Doobte ko tinke ka sahaara.. Kejriwaal had fever.. oh man.. he is a sickling.. kejriwaal had loose motions.. how will delhi go about its normal business.. kejriwaal took kongi support.. they are corrupt aren't they.. kejriwaal did not take BJP suppport they are so bloody clean.. kejriwaal did not win elections but still formed government.. power hungry bastard that he is.. Kejriwaal giving free water and electricity at 50% off.. the coffers will empty.. Kejriwaal's underling is suing a 3 year old for throwing a ball at her.. how heartless. He is conduting and ecouraging and teaching people to sting what is he sherlok holmes?.. He is conducting junta durbars.. what is this a banana republic.. etc etc etc etc... How silly is that? Really.
Facts:

1. Kejriwaals party was 2nd largest in delhi elections.
2. AAP DID NOT ask kong or bjp support.
3. Cong extended support by itself and even assorted news channels exclaimed that this was first time in history that a party is extending "unconditional support" without horse trading and that very same party later said they are not "unconditional" after all.. when asked what would they do on investigations into their shenanigans.
4. AAP Consulted the public and gave in to their request to form party.. yes some idiot said 70% people said form govt? 70% didnot vote for them..yaa idiot.. 70%-of-people-who-voted-for-them and subesequently sent sms to the question posed to them said YES. Morons.. 70% of what? 70% of SMS rec'd.. not 70% of total electorate.
5. BJP AND CONGRESS AND ASSORTED PARTIES ARE SHITTING BRICKS IN THEIR PANTS
6. 68% of electorate in URBAN areas are in favor of AAP and 34% overall as per recent trends as per CNN.. go eat that and die.

1. Kejriwaals party was 2nd largest in delhi elections.
2. AAP DID NOT ask kong or bjp support.
3. Cong extended support by itself and even assorted news channels exclaimed that this was first time in history that a party is extending "unconditional support" without horse trading and that very same party later said they are not "unconditional" after all.. when asked what would they do on investigations into their shenanigans.
4. AAP Consulted the public and gave in to their request to form government.. yes some idiot said 70% people said form govt? 70% didnot vote for them..yaa idiot.. 70%-of-people-who-voted-for-them and subesequently sent sms to the question posed to them said YES. Morons.. 70% of what? 70% of SMS rec'd.. not 70% of total electorate.
5. BJP AND CONGRESS AND ASSORTED PARTIES ARE SHITTING BRICKS IN THEIR PANTS
6. 68% of electorate in URBAN areas are in favor of AAP and 34% overall as per recent trends as per CNN.. go eat that and die.

Thank you.

chalo, now I know that you can write something that can be understood.

Now "desh dubao andolan" has extended support to Paltiwal.. you know where India is headed if AAP comes to power.

encourage you all to watch the twists and turns of Paltiwal.. I heard the letter U of English language is being changed to Kejriwal cause of his numerous U-turns.

watch for yourself..

IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.

go to any indian news websites and half the stories will be on AAP. The latest one that caught my eye was on FDI in retail where AK will not be allowing them to set up shop in Delhi. some months back, he had asked for a refrendum of this. Now the Kochchan i have is, was any player wanting to set up shop?

__________________
This is quite a game, politics. There are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends,only permanent interests. - Some Firang

Quite clear now that Delhi is the only state in whole of India.. just like Bihar was when Nitish/JD(U) quit NDA.. any anti-BJP or anti-Modi news will be made headlines quite shamelessly.. not even a recent railway accident made it to the top.

A few days back Chetan Bhagat wrote a very incisive article questioning the anti-national policies of AAP. Please read. LINK

Quite clear now that Delhi is the only state in whole of India.. just like Bihar was when Nitish/JD(U) quit NDA.. any anti-BJP or anti-Modi news will be made headlines quite shamelessly.. not even a recent railway accident made it to the top.

A few days back Chetan Bhagat wrote a very incisive article questioning the anti-national policies of AAP. Please read. LINK

good article.
pasting a piece i found sensible. Millions of Indians have worked hard in the past decade and upgraded their lifestyle. That has increased our per-capita GDP. Should we discourage that? Do we want an honest, but poor India? Is AAP pro-poor, or pro-poverty?

now, a question on corruption here.
PVN had his name in some 3 scandals (Lakhubhai Pathak, Harshad Mehta and St Kitts.) yet he successfully managed to steer the country through a tough period.
He actually managed to solve the 'Punjab Problem', ULFA also went down during his regime (to come back later on), plus brought India into the world market.
So, what can we choose - a corrupt leader who delivers (like say PV) or a honest leader who sinks (who else but AK).

I know many will jump and say 'an honest leader who delivers i.e. Na Mo'. But the question os on the 2 choices i put.

I am also waiting for someone to say that PV was honest, but lets check that separately.

__________________
This is quite a game, politics. There are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends,only permanent interests. - Some Firang