Wednesday, May 12 2010

Jeremy Bowen's 'Enjoyable New Experience'

It has been an unusual and enjoyable new experience to be able to look on as the Israelis argued with their most important ally. The fact that the dispute is over Jewish settlements is even better for the Palestinian.

It brings Marc Garlasco to mind. It wasn't so long ago that the military analyst was forced out of his job at Human Rights Watch over his Nazi memorabilia collection. Wearing iron cross sweatshirts is perfectly legal, but its incongruous if you're a human rights watchdog monitoring Israel.

It also brings to mind BBC reporter Barbara Plett crying for Yasser Arafat when he left Ramallah for the last time. Plett was censured for that. Now Bowen betrays a similar emotional bond with the Palestinians.

Would the BBC's culture would allow Bowen to express pleasure in the death of Mahmoud Mabhouh?

UPDATE May 13: I see the BBC revised the wording:

It has been an unusual and enjoyable new experience for Palestinians to be able to look on as Israel argued with its most important ally. The fact that the dispute is over Jewish settlements has been even better for them.

Jeremy Bowen responded to our report via email, saying that there was a 'glitch in [his] editing process' and that when calling a chill in U.S.-Israeli relations 'enjoyable' he had meant to attribute this view to the Palestinians. The article was subsequently amended on the BBC News website but no acknowledgement of an error was made.

Bowen's off the hook, but given hisrecord, it wouldn't surprise me if this reflected his real views. A Freudian slip?

Posted at
04:10 PM

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b7869e20133ed83a4b0970b

Comments

Bowen is an absolute disgrace.

Posted by: Adam at May 12, 2010 8:18:43 PM

No it doesn’t, these are three separate issues.
Jeremy Bowen is a senior journalist with known and easy to document anti Israel agenda.
Marc Garlasco fascination with Nazi memorabilia is disturbing but says nothing about his professionalism. As professor Gerald Steinberg keeps saying, it is his record that clouds his claims and those of HRW, for been an expert in analyzing war zones.
And Barbara Plett got carried by the moment.
Not everything we do not like is connected, even as in these examples, where we have good reason not to like.
And what Gilad Shalit has to do with Jeremy Bowen statement?