-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas E Spanjaard <tgen@netphreax.net> writes:
Thomas> Todd Vierling wrote:
>> There are many such embedded/small-CPU devices (not just for VPN,
>> mind you) that need low power consumption, which is certainly not
>> an amd64-type-CPU strong suit. A CPU of the power you mention is
>> a *very very bad* fit here; typically these machines are 486 or
>> Pentium-II generation at best. It's like comparing pears
>> vs. tangerines, or something like that.
Thomas> I'm left wondering what use PCI64/66 is there then? Sure,
Thomas> there are SoCs with PCI64/66 buses (Intel/Marvell?), but I
Thomas> haven't seen any solution where they offer that as PCI slot,
well... uhm. I've seen many devel boxes that have PCI slots like that.
PPC440s, MIPS, etc.
Do you leave it as a PCI slot? No. You buy the devices you need, and
build a new board that has the things you need.
Go open a Cisco VPN3K box and see what is inside.
- --
] Bear: "Me, I'm just the shape of a bear." | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xelerance.com http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQEVAwUBRdsV5YCLcPvd0N1lAQJ2kgf8Do2m+81cREvmir+iWMdcU/0uTZ2G+WOz
UBLmQ6N4qS0b6uTFP03gf0JQJq41GAHf7U6syW1kfCZXB5rflY58dAtl5dnsF/bb
xDKuf1/LDAKPnF3DUsh5S5qGvK0sR2nBNaFXdUn+Qg7yynZAk+RrYqZKhhQD3toP
VsbTLQgAqMaXj+9dFhmHKA1OI/2Pt+MITKo/G4s3rraAgoLLtHcLDrwddciQxZyG
zmeGDfu4BJ6UWl8Tg6pwW3t1T/feRc+sHUkplaAEGqExVp5gWnSUtcf5MRLQOy4m
gVtwFx67wCCRR8CuGIEmYUx2iW5hDHxZa91Z7qGyy5FlSGASzksyBw==
=nw0R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----