Review Sections

The Asus ET2300INTI presents a robust alternative to the dainty Vizio CA24T-A4 all-in-one. Where Vizio pared away features for the sake of a low-profile appearance, Asus has taken an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach with its midrange Windows 8 all-in-one. Even if not everyone will want the Asus' more outlandish features, like Thunderbolt ports or Intel Wireless Display technology, this $1,299 PC is a better value than the Vizio system overall, and I'd be more likely to recommend it as a touch-screen desktop for this price range.

Neither system sets a new standard for PC design, but Asus for the most part does not appear to be chasing after a particular aesthetic with the ET2300INTI. Where Vizio is trying to present a minimalist, anticomputer vibe, the brushed-aluminum-and-black-plastic Asus system simply looks like yet another take on commodity PC design.

If its appearance isn't remarkable, the ET2300INTI can at least say that it has a more touch-friendly design. The adjustable support arm on the Asus system lets you lay the monitor in tabletop mode. It's not quite as incrementally adjustable as I'd like -- the design of the arm is such that even tilting the screen back a few degrees also lowers the display vertically. It's still more flexible than the Vizio system, for which you can't recline the display more than about 35 degrees. The Asus' touch screen also felt more responsive.

Asus ET2300INTI

Vizio CA24T-A4

Price

$1,299

$1,249

Display size/resolution

23-inch, 1,920x1,080 pixels

24-inch, 1,920x1,080 pixels

CPU

3.0GHz Intel Core i5-3330

2.5GHz Intel Core i5-3210M

Memory

8GB 1,333MHZ DDR3 SDRAM

6GB 1,333MHZ DDR3 SDRAM

Graphics

1GB Nvidia GeForce GT630M

32MB Intel HD Graphics 4000

Hard drives

1TB, 7,200rpm

1TB, 5,400rpm

Optical drive

Dual-layer DVD burner

None

Networking

Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11b/g/n wireless

Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11b/g/n wireless

Operating system

Windows 8 (64-bit)

Windows 8 (64-bit)

Asus went all-out in terms of equipping the ET2300INTI with up-to-date features, but it comes out looking better than the Vizio system even before we delve into the nonstandard core computing specs. The desktop CPU in the Asus provides a big advantage over the Vizio's mobile chip. Asus also includes more system memory, a full-speed hard drive, and a discrete graphics card, all of which are better than their equivalent parts in the Vizio system.

You can probably consider a Blu-ray drive the left-out "kitchen sink" in this Asus configuration. Whether you will appreciate the DVD burner you get instead is debatable, but it's hard to blame Vizio for leaving out an optical drive entirely. The Asus' DVD burner certainly doesn't hurt, but that feature is becoming less important by the day.

Aside from its core specs, Asus has added two features you won't find in many Windows PCs: Thunderbolt ports and an Intel Wireless Display adapter.

The Thunderbolt ports worked easily enough, extending the display over a single cable connected to an Apple Thunderbolt Cinema Display. We don't have any other Thunderbolt devices on hand to test, which perhaps points to the larger question: will the likely buyers of this PC also want Thunderbolt? I suspect that they will not, but including Thunderbolt at least gives Asus a point of check-box parity with Apple's newer iMac.

The Wireless Display (WiDi) tech is arguably more in keeping with the needs of the mainstream consumer who might want this Asus system, although that also has some big caveats. The Intel-driven tech has always been more of an experiment than a killer feature. The idea is that it transmits your PC's video signal directly to a television or some other display equipped with a WiDi receiver. Some newer, more expensive TVs have WiDi receivers built in. Otherwise you can buy a standalone WiDi receiver for $100 or so.

Asus includes no WiDi receiver with the ET2300INTI, so you need to bring your own. Even then, you may not have luck making a connection. I tried connecting to a WiDi-equipped TV from LG, and an error message popped up on the Asus system informing me that the LG's adapter was not compatible with Windows 8. A fix could be a mere firmware update away, although the most recent update, from mid-November, was apparently not good enough.

Even if WiDi never worked, or if it wasn't included to begin with, I don't believe many people would miss it due to poor image quality under even the best conditions. With WiDi or no, the Asus still has strong features for its price.