tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post3224611348154620656..comments2016-12-08T06:30:06.612-06:00Comments on Sipsey Street Irregulars: David Codrea is properly skeptical of the Washington Times.Dutchman6http://www.blogger.com/profile/09935420042995679958noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-12232164609700924422012-02-16T17:07:01.279-06:002012-02-16T17:07:01.279-06:00Hmmm.... did you see David&#39;s update? It might...Hmmm.... did you see David&#39;s update? It might be misreading on his part -- indicating that Obama *is* trying to delete these provisions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575061201749703300.post-14384092615002920522012-02-16T17:03:56.051-06:002012-02-16T17:03:56.051-06:00Per Emily Miller: &quot;All my work is well-source...Per Emily Miller: &quot;All my work is well-sourced and thoroughly edited before publication. I will explain that the 219 and any other general provisions I mentioned are being edited because they are in brackets- that&#39;s how to indicate removal of current law in the budget. To understand budet materials, I&#39;d suggest you call the White House or the Senate and House Budget committees.&quot;David Codreahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13836716551269849012noreply@blogger.com