Sometime this week, Google Reader will retire its many confusing sharing features, in attempt to force their small but passionate community to relocate to Google+. It's part of the company's portal-wide redesign effort that will soon affect Blogger and Gmail, where Google will be adding new features instead of taking them away. But if you're a devoted Google Reader user, however, the chore of figuring out how to recreate your old Reader experience in the absence of friending and following far outweighs the upgrades like fancy new button gradients and Google+ integration. Don't worry. We've got you covered.

Creating Reader-Specific Circles

We borrowed the term "Reader-specific circles" from Google's executioner-like blog post about the outgoing social features: friending, following and sharing. This is the full-conversion solution that Google hopes most Reader users decide to pursue. If you're familiar with Google+, setting up the Circles is dead simple, but finding those friends and adding them to the circle one at a time is huge pain. (Unless, as hinted in the official blog post, Google launches an easier export feature with the redesign.) Google+ also won't perfectly re-create the Reader sharing experience. And if you had any doubts about how badly Reader needed a redesign, the number of total steps and illustrations needed to sort everything out will dash them.

If you share items publicly in Reader, you don't have to change a thing - All of your Reader shares should be viewable by everyone following you. You just have to tell them to add you to their Circles in Google+.

Create a specific circles for your Reader friends

Go to your Google Plus homepage and click the Circles icon at the top of the page (or this hyperlink). This will pull up all of your existing Circles and suggest a bunch of friends to add to them.

Feel free to start dragging and dropping people into the "Create a New Circle" bubble on the lefthand side, but it'll take you a while if you have a lot of people to add. We've figurd out a work-around so that you can add everyone at once.

Move all of your Reader followers and follows into Circles

Click on the "Share Settings" button at on the lefthand side of the page. It should be a link at the bottom of the "People You Follow" box. (You might have to click the + sign to expand the box.) It might be useful to name it "Reader Followers."

Click on the link for "### people are following you." This should bring up a lightbox showing all of your followers.

Once you see the list of people following you, open a new window with your new Google+ Circle. The only way to make sure your old followers will see your new Google+ posts is to add them one-by-one to your new Reader share circle. (Are you confused yet? It's confusing.)

If you want to create a different circle of people that you follow, just re-do step one--name it "Reader Follows" or something. On step two, instead of clicking on the link for "### people are following you" click the link that reads "You are following ### people." This will pull up a list of people you're following that you can then add into your new "Reader Follows" Circle. Now whenever you want to read your old followers shared items, just click the "Reader Follows" Circle on the lefthand side of the Google+ homepage.

Some Alternatives to Google Reader

If you're feeling burned by Google and want to ditch it altogether, there are a couple other RSS readers on the web that we'd recommend. However, social RSS readers have been hit hard by the successes of sharing on Facebook and Twitter so the once crowded marketplace that included start-ups like Streamy and Feed Each Other is now pretty barren. Tumblr also used to support RSS, but they axed the feature this summer. We'll be the first to say that the Reader alternatives are not great, and it might be time to admit it: RSS is dead.

Netvibes - Once a Google Reader competitor, Netvibes is a decent RSS reader with very basic sharing options: email, Facebook and Twitter. There's some bonus functionality in being able to set up Netvibes as an iGoogle-like homepage, if you're into that kind of thing. Bloglines is a very similar service.

BuzzBlaze - Earlier this year, The Next Web posted a preview of BuzzBlaze, an application that looks like a next-generation Reader. However, for now it's in private beta, but you can sign up for early access.

Google+ - As much as it hurts to admit it, Google+ is probably as close as you're going to get. Five months after launch, the social network is facing flagging traffic, struggling to keep people on the site and not making much progress with power users, like celebrities (as Twitter did) and brands (as did Facebook). But Google+ isn't finished yet. In the past few days, a small wave of new features have been splashing around in other Google products, like Reader and Blogger, and Google executives have announced that they'll soon allow pseudonyms on the site. It might even get a music store!

Most Popular

The legend of the Confederate leader’s heroism and decency is based in the fiction of a person who never existed.

The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. That’s understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lee’s statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

On August 21, the “moon” will pass between the Earth and the sun, obscuring the light of the latter. The government agency NASA says this will result in “one of nature’s most awe-inspiring sights.” The astronomers there claim to have calculated down to the minute exactly when and where this will happen, and for how long. They have reportedly known about this eclipse for years, just by virtue of some sort of complex math.

This seems extremely unlikely. I can’t even find these eclipse calculations on their website to check them for myself.

Meanwhile the scientists tell us we can’t look at it without special glasses because “looking directly at the sun is unsafe.”

Just seven months into his presidency, Trump appears to have achieved a status usually reserved for the final months of a term.

In many ways, the Trump presidency never got off the ground: The president’s legislative agenda is going nowhere, his relations with foreign leaders are frayed, and his approval rating with the American people never enjoyed the honeymoon period most newly elected presidents do. Pundits who are sympathetic toward, or even neutral on, the president keep hoping that the next personnel move—the appointment of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, say, or the long-rumored-but-never-delivered departure of Steve Bannon—will finally get the White House in gear.

But what if they, and many other people, are thinking about it wrong? Maybe the reality is not that the Trump presidency has never gotten started. It’s that he’s already reached his lame-duck period. For most presidents, that comes in the last few months of a term. For Trump, it appears to have arrived early, just a few months into his term. The president did always brag that he was a fast learner.

An analysis of Stormfront forums shows a sometimes sophisticated understanding of the limits of ancestry tests.

The white-nationalist forum Stormfront hosts discussions on a wide range of topics, from politics to guns to The Lord of the Rings. And of particular and enduring interest: genetic ancestry tests. For white nationalists, DNA tests are a way to prove their racial purity. Of course, their results don’t always come back that way. And how white nationalists try to explain away non-European ancestry is rather illuminating of their beliefs.

Two years ago—before Donald Trump was elected president, before white nationalism had become central to the political conversation—Aaron Panofsky and Joan Donovan, sociologists then at the University of California, Los Angeles, set out to study Stormfront forum posts about genetic ancestry tests. They presented their study at the American Sociological Association meeting this Monday. (A preprint of the paper is now online.) After the events in Charlottesville this week, their research struck a particular chord with the audience.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

Antifa’s activists say they’re battling burgeoning authoritarianism on the American right. Are they fueling it instead?

Since 1907, Portland, Oregon, has hosted an annual Rose Festival. Since 2007, the festival had included a parade down 82nd Avenue. Since 2013, the Republican Party of Multnomah County, which includes Portland, had taken part. This April, all of that changed.

In the days leading up to the planned parade, a group called the Direct Action Alliance declared, “Fascists plan to march through the streets,” and warned, “Nazis will not march through Portland unopposed.” The alliance said it didn’t object to the Multnomah GOP itself, but to “fascists” who planned to infiltrate its ranks. Yet it also denounced marchers with “Trump flags” and “red maga hats” who could “normalize support for an orange man who bragged about sexually harassing women and who is waging a war of hate, racism and prejudice.” A second group, Oregon Students Empowered, created a Facebook page called “Shut down fascism! No nazis in Portland!”

Anti-Semitic logic fueled the violence over the weekend, no matter what the president says.

The “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville was ostensibly about protecting a statue of Robert E. Lee. It was about asserting the legitimacy of “white culture” and white supremacy, and defending the legacy of the Confederacy.

So why did the demonstrators chant anti-Semitic lines like “Jews will not replace us”?

The demonstration was suffused with anti-black racism, but also with anti-Semitism. Marchers displayed swastikas on banners and shouted slogans like “blood and soil,” a phrase drawn from Nazi ideology. “This city is run by Jewish communists and criminal niggers,” one demonstrator told Vice News’ Elspeth Reeve during their march. As Jews prayed at a local synagogue, Congregation Beth Israel, men dressed in fatigues carrying semi-automatic rifles stood across the street, according to the temple’s president. Nazi websites posted a call to burn their building. As a precautionary measure, congregants had removed their Torah scrolls and exited through the back of the building when they were done praying.

If the president is concerned about violence on the left, he can start by fighting the white supremacist movements whose growth has fueled its rise.

In his Tuesday press conference, Donald Trump talked at length about what he called “the alt left.” White supremacists, he claimed, weren’t the only people in Charlottesville last weekend that deserved condemnation. “You had a group on the other side that was also very violent,” he declared. “Nobody wants to say that.”

I can say with great confidence that Trump’s final sentence is untrue. I can do so because the September issue of TheAtlantic contains an essay of mine entitled “The Rise of the Violent Left,” which discusses the very phenomenon that Trump claims “nobody wants” to discuss. Trump is right that, in Charlottesville and beyond, the violence of some leftist activists constitutes a real problem. Where he’s wrong is in suggesting that it’s a problem in any way comparable to white supremacism.

The nation’s current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history.

When did America become untethered from reality?

I first noticed our national lurch toward fantasy in 2004, after President George W. Bush’s political mastermind, Karl Rove, came up with the remarkable phrase reality-based community. People in “the reality-based community,” he told a reporter, “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality … That’s not the way the world really works anymore.” A year later, The Colbert Report went on the air. In the first few minutes of the first episode, Stephen Colbert, playing his right-wing-populist commentator character, performed a feature called “The Word.” His first selection: truthiness. “Now, I’m sure some of the ‘word police,’ the ‘wordinistas’ over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word!’ Well, anybody who knows me knows that I’m no fan of dictionaries or reference books.