Chemtrails, Aluminum Powder
And A Mass Aluminum
Poisoning In The UKFrom Steve Meyers

globalstrategies@home.com

Jeff,

Only passing this on for review and feedback from others
who might be more knowledgeable on these important matters.

1) Based on the research and information provided by
William Thomas at his website:

"Aluminum oxide can withstand temperatures far higher
than jet engine exhausts. While highly abrasive in larger sizes, a former
engineer for Alcoa aluminum says that aluminum in the 10 to 100 micron
sizes called for in the sunscreen patent would simply polish jet turbine
blades without harming them. The engineer added that this "very fine,
talcum-like" aluminum powder would appear as a "pure white plume"
in the sky.

2) Another reference also mentioned:

"...are [85%] titanium dioxide pigment having a median
particle size of about 0.3 microns. Said radiation scattering powder particles
have a coating of extremely fine hydrophobic colloidal silco [10% by weight
of colloidal silica of 0.007 micron primary particle size, and 5% by weight
of silica gel having an average particle size of 4.5 microns] thereon to
minimize interparticle cohesive forces.

3) Now, I know that different compounds and molecular
arrangements of elements can have very different chemical and biological
effects. And recognizing that based on the above, "chemtrails"
might be largely composed of an "aluminum" powder - now consider
the possible health effects on humans and animals and/or eco-systems as
a result of "chemtrail spraying".

The potential consequences could be catestrophic if this
"solution" turns out to be another oversight like DDT, POPs,
PVCs (endocrine disruptors) DIOXINS, PCBs, etc. Just read the following
article to understand "how".

I'd appreciate any chemists' or ecologists' insights on
how the following article might have significance, or not, to the above
contention that the material composition of "chemtrails" is an
aluminum compound.

Best to all

Steve Meyers

Global Strategies Project

http://www.bashar.com/GSP

globalstrategies@home.com

Inquiry Launched Into Camelford Aluminum Poisoning

By Michael McCarthy Environment Editor The Independent
- London
8-14-1

A 13-year fight for an investigation into Britain's worst
case of water poisoning, in which symptoms afflicting hundreds of people
were written off as imaginary, will culminate today in the announcement
of an official government inquiry.

The Environment minister Michael Meacher is expected to
announce a formal investigation into the effects of the mass-contamination
at Camelford in Cornwall in July 1988, when water supplies to 20,000 homes
were polluted by 20 tons of aluminium sulphate accidentally dumped in the
wrong tank by a lorry driver.

Almost immediately, hundreds of people reported alarming
symptoms, ranging from peeling skin and hair turning green to nausea, vomiting
and joint pains. More seriously, over weeks, months and years many victims
claimed long-term impairment of brain functions such as memory and balance.

But no full survey of those affected was done and the
Department of Health's own report on the incident made light of the possible
aluminium poisoning, saying people's symptoms were "the consequence
of sustained anxiety", and blaming the media for whipping up public
concern. Eventually, a group of victims settled out of court for modest
damages.

Campaigners say the full consequences of the incident
were covered up by the Tory government of the day because it was in the
middle of privatising the water industry and wanted no bad publicity; the
publicly owned South-West Water Authority, in charge of Camelford's supplies
at the time, was being transformed into the privatised South-West Water.

Paul Tyler, Liberal Democrat MP for North Cornwall, who
has led the inquiry campaign, said: "The accident was a major calamity,
the worst of its type to happen in Britain, but what happened afterwards
was undoubtedly covered up for political convenience as water was about
to be privatised.

"My constituents were undoubtedly injured - some
people's lives have been wrecked - but insult was added to the injury by
the failure to look after them. I will be delighted by the announcement
of an inquiry."

The Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
said only that Mr Meacher would be announcing "the next steps on Camelford",
but sources indicated an inquiry was on the cards. Mr Meacher visited Camelford
last year, at Mr Tyler's urging, to listen to people's stories of how they
had been affected. At a meeting, he began by insisting an inquiry was not
possible but ended saying his mind was changing.

The government investigation is unlikely to be a full-scale
public inquiry. Mr Tyler said: "[That]would just be going back to
square one and there is no need for it because the basic facts are too
well-known. But there has never been a public, impartial, independent investigation
of what has been caused in health consequences

"What we want is an effective analysis of the health
side-effects that would seem to have been caused by exposure to aluminium
sulphate, and an assessment of the health treat- ment needs of people who
have suffered. And we might get answers to some questions which we didn't
have at the time, such as why there was a cover-up."

Last week, Peter Smith, chairman of the Lowermoor Support
Group, which represents those affected, said he was "open-minded"
about an announcement. "We are hoping the Government will deliver
on the promise it made while in opposition to give us a public inquiry,"
he said. "They can call it what they like as long as it is given wide
powers and is independent. But if it is some sort of Whitehall botch we
will be very unhappy."

In 1999, evidence delayed from 1991 because of legal problems
was published in the British Medical Journal suggesting that some people
suffered brain damage. Researchers led by Dr Paul Altmann rejected the
original government claim that anxiety was the cause of symptoms and concluded:
"Aluminium sulphate poisoning probably led to long-term cerebral impairment
in some people."