On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:21 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> Dan,
>
> You seemed clear during Tues telcon that if I changed the
> inputSerialization of the POST binding at all, I should add the */*
> type specifier to application/x-www-form-urlencoded instead of what I
> would have expected to add, namely, application/xml.
I meant to say */* for _output_ serialization; i.e. to say
that text/n3 is OK.
> I expected to add application/xml because the only other way to spell
> SPARQL queries, formally or informally, is through XML serialization
> of the abstract syntax. That's the only other way anyone's talked
> about, as I recall.
Fair enough.
>
> I'm confused about the use of */* here, and as a result, I'm not
> going to add anything till I'm less confused. :>
>
> Cheers,
> Kendall
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E