He may have a tougher time with this than with the “safe act”(?) since it’s likely that the legislature has more interaction with sugary drinks than with guns. What a self serving radical left wing extremist demokkkrat scumbag this clown is. Does he have any stock in coke or pepsi?

5
posted on 03/03/2013 9:50:43 AM PST
by rktman
(Live the oath you took or get out of office!)

“Oh that’s ridiculous! Tyranny could never happen in the USA! you’re overreacting!”

Well, New York city is now a despotic state. Does anyone deny this? Even liberals I think know it as I heard them complain about the despot. I read last year the despot is demanding all landlords submit a list of all the people who smoke in their apartments, which is an invasion of privacy. Good. I hope he installs cameras in their bedrooms next. “Tyranny can never happen in the USA! We don’t need guns!” LOL!

11
posted on 03/03/2013 10:02:56 AM PST
by GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")

Actually he’s more of a despot. He’s proven that tyranny can take root and exist in the USA. Two weeks ago Mr. Despot issued an edict banning 2 liter sodas with pizza deliveries. So if you’re having a card game with a few of your buddies and want some pizza, the delivery guy has to bring a bunch of smaller bottles of soda because the Despot has decided adults are not responsible enough to handle 2 liter bottles. Last year he also issued an edict demanding landlords submit a list to the city of all the tenants who smoke in their apartments. Sort of like “Send a list of all the Juden”.

13
posted on 03/03/2013 10:10:05 AM PST
by GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")

Decades ago when the government started banning substances like drugs people stood up and said what business is it of the governments to tell us what we can and cannot do. Many people responded they thought the concept of government power to ban things is good for us, that drugs were bad. The first group said the concept isn’t about drugs specifically but the idea the government had authority to ban anything in the first place.

Well, now the government is doing exactly what the first group knew they would do and that is ban more and more common things like sugar.

Totalitarianism. That’s what the first group was warning about. Too late.

16
posted on 03/03/2013 10:33:13 AM PST
by CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)

I’m hoping the democrat morons in NY follow his lead. The stupider they act, the sooner normal people will abandon them. And again, shame on the GOP for not using enough of the democrat antics to paint them as they are.

Use your bully pulpit to tell people what is wrong with sugary drinks. Don’t force people with laws! Not only is it totalitarian, it doesn’t work. I believe pot is banned in NYC too? How’s that working for you?

I wish I were a better person, but I’m not — I hope Bloomberg meets a sudden end, and soon. It would be most appropriate if he got, for example, a sudden fatal allergic reaction to some small portion diet food item. I’d pee my pants laughing.

24
posted on 03/03/2013 5:30:17 PM PST
by SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.