[JUDICIAL ERROR - MENTAL] Haliburton v. Walker cannot be sound reasoning about mental steps, if it rests on a decision, Don Juan, that nowhere mentions mental steps. The Don Lee decision is a long ruling on the issue of patent novelty, and nowhere uses terms such as "mental", "mind", and "thought". Thus, this first, circuit court, decision using the concept of "mental steps" rests on a decision that nowhere mentions "mental steps". It is judicial error to cite Don Juan as a basis for a banning method patents for being "mental steps". Worse, nowhere does Haliburton define very complicated terms such as "mental" and "thought". In re Abrams should not be a precedent for any decision on mental steps.