When stacked as shown, the driver combos should be able to drive at 4A. This is partly because he ganged together the outputs in pairs, and also because of the stacking. That’s a lot of juice, but [Starlino] documented his testing stage which shows that they’re up to it. It’s a bit hard to see from this angle, but he is using a serpentine heat sink. It snakes its way between the stack of chips, then over the top chip before folding back and spreading its wings. The motors he’s using have a stall current of 3.7A, and he included resettable fuses graded at a 2A hold current. He’ll be glad to have that extra protection is something goes wrong with the drivers.

The SN754410 is just a Quad H Bridge, merely a few PNP and NPN transistors in an IC shell. I doubt that the tolerances on the chips would be great enough to cause any problems.

My Robotics Professor did this when the current from some motors was literally setting single chips on fire (, the problem was a weird bug in the code that caused the signal to alternate rapidly, but we tried this method before we found the source of the problem, as it is hard to debug when your robot is on fire).

I did this last year for a class project (Kinect + Toy Gun + Turret combo driven by a really big DC motor for moving the gun platform around …). We had a few instances of blowing up the SN754410 chips, but they were mostly attributed to shoot-through condition. Apparently the guy who programmed the PIC controlling this concoction wasn’t sensitive to the timing constraints for switching directions. Polarity was switched too soon and the back EMF popped chips like popcorn.

Ruining the chips because of timing differences or oscillations in this type of configuration is not unlikely. Also i wouldn’t even consider running 4A in a low-cost DIL socket. Maybe in a high quality socket.

1) they’ll all have the same response time… they are analog and identical shadow mask

2) correct that the socket might not be rated for 4A, but for short term its okay as long as you inspect for blackened contacts hourly/daily/ect

3) its a very good idea but i would have added equilization resistors… if theres a difference in chips, it’ll be the voltage drop from power-in to motor-out, so put each output pin in series with a 0.1 or 0.01 ohm resistor so they share the currect aprox 50%-50% each, even when they have vastly different voltage drops (EG: 0.69v vs 0.72)

they teach you to do that in (ancient) linear powersupply designs made from discreet transistors… if using 10 transistors in parallel to get 10x output current, then add 0.1 or 0.01 ohm in series to EACH output transistor THEN tie all in parallel

I’m not understanding exactly what he’s saying there in #3. The drive pins have the series resistor, and the other end of the resistors are ganged to form the output? Or do you need another resistor to tie the outputs from the 0.1 ohms drive-side?

@Mikey: You’re not sending the current through the 0.1 ohm resistor to ground (“parallel to ground”) you’re putting it inline with the motor drive power lines to do this “balancing” they are talking about. Motor coils have a finite resistance, between a few ohms to a few hundred ohms, depending on the motor.

What I don’t understand is how these series resistors do any “current balancing”…

An L298n dual full bridge driver isn’t very expensive and will do 4A when you tie the two drivers together (That’s one of the examples in the datasheet btw)
They come in a multiwatt-15 package so you can bolt them to a huge heatsink too.

You can’t double up everything. The problem is that they will never be exactly the same: even if the output stage semiconductor devices are from the same batch, they can be influenced by temperature drifts, connection lengths, etc. If their temperature coefficient is positive, it’ll run away from equilibrium: more power through one part means higher temperature means more power.

Bipolar (traditional, pnp/npn) transistors have this problem; MOSFETS don’t. The problem can be remediated by ballast resistors, which however are tricky (they are in the main power path).

Bottom line/TL;DR: sometimes it can be done but it actually requires some thought.

And exactly why is it that mosfets don’t share this same problem? They have unique parameters from chip to chip too as far as I remember when doing the same thing for a low side PWM power control circuit.

MOSFETs have a positive thermal coefficient of Rdson, which means that the hotter chip in a parallel set will carry less of the current.

Side-effect: if you don’t heatsink your MOSFETS properly and keep them cool, the performance gets really bad. Particularly problematic is when there’s a feedback loop around the whole system trying to drive constant power into the load; the FETs get warm, dissipate more power, get warmer, etc until something burns.

BJTs on the other hand do not. Common case is that one in a parallel set will take the vast majority of the current and then blow and then the next one goes, etc.

The point is that there are caveats to doing this, which warrant a disclaimer so that people who don’t know better (including you) won’t blindly copy it.

BJTs do not lend themselves to being paralleled. If you do it, you should add balancing resistors. And even then (but especially without), two in parallel will not run at double their individual ratings without eventually failing.

Chris… you dont know me and you dont know what I know about semiconductor devices. Stating that someone doesnt know better, without ever seeing them, talking to them, seeing their work, or otherwise having any knowledge about them, is just being presumptuous.

Chances are none of us here know you personally. Our sole impression of you is based on your comments. So far you’ve complained, failed to grasp the point, and chosen to get indignant rather than intelligently discussing any of the facts myself or others have laid out. Therefore that is how you will be known, by your own actions, regardless of presumption or your opinion of yourself.

you can find cheap as dirt igbt ipm modules on ebay,just ridiculous overkill for small motors and they’ll last just about forever, no need to worry about killing them. $20 is the normal range for one, unless this is all you had, i would go the igbt route. but in a pinch, if it gets the job done, what’s the difference. good work!

i live in south texas, and there’s not an electronics shop for about 150 miles that carries a decent assortment of components. on ebay, i found 2 nice 30 amp, 600 volt modules for $29.80 shipped, took less than a week to get here. FSBB30CH60 modules if you’re interested. besides op amps, comparators, dinky mosfets, bjt’s and lots of passives, you won’t find a lot of selection nearby.

Otte,
It’s the difference between prototyping and production. Starlino did a great job and got his problem solved. The point being brought up is it won’t always work without a little extra design effort. This is why things seem to work in a lab and you get to production and have huge fallout. He is not making a lot, but if everyone does this some will have fallout. The comments are meant to help improve the design not denigrate what he has accomplished. My 2 cents worth.