Contents

Mental rotation usually takes place in the right cerebral hemisphere, in the areas where perception also occurs. It is associated with the rate of spatial processing and intelligence (Johnson 1990, Jones 1982, Hertzog 1991).

Mental rotation can be separated into the following cognitive stages (Johnson 1990):

In a mental rotation test, the subject is asked to compare two 3D objects (or letters) and state if they are the same image or if they are mirror images (enantiomorphs). Commonly, the test will have pairs of images each rotated a specific amount of degrees (eg. 15º or 45º). Some pairs will be the same image rotated, and others will be mirrored. The subject will be shown a set number of the pairs. The subject will be judged on how accurately and rapidly they can distinguish between the mirrored and non-mirrored pairs.

Roger Shepard and Metzler (1971) originally discovered this phenomenon. Their research showed that the reaction time for participants to decide if the pair of items matched or not was linearly proportional to the angle of rotation from the original position. That is, the more an object has been rotated from the original, the longer it takes an individual to determine if the 2 images are of the same object or enantiomorphs (Sternberg 247).

In further research, Shepard and Cooper (1982) have proposed the concept of a "Mental Imagery" facility, which is responsible for the ability to mentally rotate visual forms. Additionally, it has been found it does not matter on which axis an object is rotated, but rather the degree to which it is rotated that has the most significant effect on response time. So rotations within the depth plane (i.e., 2D rotations) and rotations in depth (3D rotations) behave similarly. Thus, the matching requires more time as the amount of depth rotation increases, just as for within the depth plane.

In subsequent research, it has been found that response times increase for degraded stimuli and can decrease when participants are allowed to practice mentally rotating imagery (Sternberg 247). This research has been instrumental in showing how people use mental representations to navigate their environments.

Bauer, B. (2005). "Two- and three-dimensional mental rotation tasks lead to different parietal laterality for men and women": Comment: International Journal of Psychophysiology Vol 57(3) Sep 2005, 151-152.

Burkitt, J., Widman, D., & Saucier, D. M. (2007). Evidence for the influence of testosterone in the performance of spatial navigation in a virtual water maze in women but not in men: Hormones and Behavior Vol 51(5) May 2007, 649-654.

Lejeune, M. (1994). Role of proximity and spatial position of stimulus characteristics during the development of mental rotation capacities: Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition Vol 13(4) Aug 1994, 469-492.

Mitsuda, M. (1993). Effects of imagery representations and question aids in comprehension of geometry texts by elementary school children, junior-high school and college students: Japanese Psychological Research Vol 35(2) 1993, 47-56.

Paredes, D. R. (1994). Sources and consequences of developing skill in mental addition: A comparison of U.S. and Chinese grade school children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.

Pierret, A., Peronnet, F., & Thevenet, M. (1994). An electrophysiological study of the mental rotation of polygons: Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience Vol 5(9) May 1994, 1153-1156.

Rigal, R. (1996). Right-left orientation, mental rotation, and perspective-taking: When can children imagine what people see from their own viewpoint? : Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 83(3, Pt 1) Dec 1996, 831-842.

Strong, S. D. (2000). The development of a computerized version of Vandenberg's mental rotation test and the effect of visuo-spatial working memory loading. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.