Mani Ratnams problematic take on adoption

The noted filmmaker has taken up the subject
of adoption only to orphan it at the altar of commercial
concerns.

By Lalitha Sridhar

Mani Ratnam`s newest film "Kannathil Muthamittal"
(loosely translated, a kiss on the cheek) is anything but. The noted filmmaker
has taken up the subject of adoption only to orphan it at the altar of
commercial concerns. Mainstream Indian cinema has been rightly accused of
trivializing and/or avoiding real issues more often than not. The only rays of
silver lining all that celluloid are to be found in the visions of the men and,
rarely, women who occupy the director`s chair. Some of them earn a certain
reputation for being more true and appreciably sensitive. Mani Ratnam is one
such star whose sparkle shines through all the tinsel. Or does it? When the
director chooses to approach subjects which demand a greater courage, he seems
to fall short. And how.

In "Anjali" he was lauded for looking into
the world of a mentally ill child. But it was a very short look - the story had
her die in the end, as one activist friend put it "very conveniently"
- doing away with the need to address the questions which hound parents of
differently abled children, including long-term care and its attendant issues.
In "Dil Se" ("Uyire" in Tamil) his heroine was a suicide
bomber. A gorgeous one, the very sight of whom compelled the hero to chase her
to the ends of the earth (or India, in any case). In "Kannathil Muthamittal"
too, Mani Ratnam chooses to enter the issue of terrorism but refuses to take a
side on it. Why, he even goes to the extent of giving big eyes and normal
dreams to those who propound it - look, he seems tell us, how human these human
bombs are. Films like Gulzar`s "Maachis" also turned terrorists into
key players who sing songs in their spare time. But these directors insist they
are not glamorizing misguided youth simply because they have written their
deaths into the end of their scripts - as if the futility of an endeavour is
enough to convey its wrongness.

His latest offering, Mani Ratnam would like us to
believe, is a child`s view of the world. But since the script is loyal to her
voice only patchily, that vision becomes blurred early on. In the meanwhile,
simply because his story considers it necessary, the issue of adoption is
treated with excessive emotion and little credibility. This is what happens :
Thiru, a popular and idealistic writer, early in his career, chooses to adopt a
baby abandoned in a Sri Lankan refugee camp in Rameswaram. He is single and the
romance angle is woven into the story by making it look like only married
couples can adopt a child (the director justifies this as the policy of that
particular orphanage but the misleading impression remains). Nine years later,
Amudha (for that is the name of the dearly loved girl) is told on her birthday
that she is an adopted child. This pivotal scene is handled with amazing
callousness - the child is taken alone to a secluded part of a beach, the
mother refuses to participate saying she cannot face her and the father
announces in one irritating moment of distracted child`s play - "nee yenga
ponnu illai" (you are not our daughter). Would any adoptive parent choose
those (untrue, unless we want to rethink adoption altogether) words to make
such an announcement? Besides, all the drama surrounding the revelation seemed
to imply (as a foregone conclusion) that the news was terrible (why should the
parents be so defensive?). The scenes of Amudha`s extreme reaction, which
follow, confirm exactly that. Such cinematic flourish is more than
self-indulgence or creative largesse - it extracts a terrible price from the
issue of adoption which is then used as a vehicle to address the director`s
warped take on terrorism.

The child, who is unnecessarily made out to be extra special
and extra loved right from the beginning (the couple also have two boys), holds
the family to ransom by behaving more like a rebellious adolescent than an
innocent pre-ten. She runs away from home on two occasions and literally forces
her parents to fly to a beautiful and war-torn Sri Lanka searching for the
woman who abandoned her (all captured brilliantly by Ravi Chandran`s camera).
Here they go searching,

The new term for self censorship is voluntary censorship, as proposed by companies like Netflix and Hotstar. ET reports that streaming video service Amazon Prime is opposing a move by its peers to adopt a voluntary censorship code in anticipation of the Indian government coming up with its own rules. Amazon is resisting because it fears that it may alienate paying subscribers.

Clearly, the run to the 2019 elections is on. A journalist received a call from someone saying they were from Aajtak channel and were conducting a survey, asking whom she was going to vote for in 2019. On being told that her vote was secret, the caller assumed she wasn't going to vote for 'Modiji'. The caller, a woman, also didn't identify herself. A month or two earlier the same journalist received a call, this time from a man, asking if she was going to vote for the BSP.