Penguins make changes after humbling loss to San Jose

Pittsburgh Penguins right wing Patric Hornqvist (72) and Tampa Bay Lightning defenseman Erik Cernak (81) battle along the boards during the first period of an NHL hockey game Saturday, Feb. 9, 2019, in Tampa, Fla.

TribLIVE's Daily and Weekly email newsletters deliver the news you want and information you need, right to your inbox.

PHILADELPHIA – Putting aside the extracurricular activities associated with a Stadium Series game, the Pittsburgh Penguins had some work to do at Friday’s practice at Lincoln Financial Field.

They had to make some changes after a particularly uninspired 4-0 loss to San Jose on Thursday.

Most notably, coach Mike Sullivan made a few alterations to his line combinations. In an obvious attempt to get Patric Hornqvist jump-started, he was on the top line with Sidney Crosby and Jake Guentzel. Hornqvist hasn’t recorded a point in his last 14 games.

Also, after the Penguins gave up their league-leading 13th shorthanded goal of the season Thursday night, Sullivan split up his top power-play unit.

“As a group, we have to be better on the power play,” Sullivan said. “We’ve gone a long time with the units that we have and we haven’t seen the necessary momentum to continue. Having said that, we know we have a group of five that we can put out there that are dynamic when they’re at the top of their game.

“We’ll make those decisions on a game-by-game basis. Today we practiced some different options. Whether we choose to go with those, that’s going to be a discussion the coaching staff will have almost daily.”

The Flyers made an interesting decision in goal, with veteran Brian Elliott getting the nod over Carter Hart. A promising rookie, Hart has been pulled from his last two starts.

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our
Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent
via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.