Bertillionage to Fingerprinting

Alphonse Bertillion developed a method of recording physical features of a person in such a way that the record would be unique to that person. It consisted of taking measurements of various parts of the body, such as the head, shoulders, fingers, and skull. This method was referred to as Bertillionage, after its creator. Bertillion developed a set of precise measuring instruments to be used with his method. The Bertillionage system became very popular throughout Europe and the United States. It became widely used in U.S. prisons, which needed a way to track the prisoners. The Bertillion system was plagued by problems of reproducibility (2 people could have the exact same measurements therefore one person could be charged with the wrong doings of multiple people. In 1903 a prisoner named William West was admitted to the prison to serve a sentence. When he was measured using the Bertillion system, it was found that a man with the name William West with virtually the same set of measurements was already at the prison! This discredited the Bertillionage and opened the door for the study of fingerprints. Bertillion used fingerprints in his system but didn’t have a good way to organize them for mass searches. Dr. Juan Vucetich conceived of a method of fingerprint classification in 1894 that provided for 1,048,576 primary classifications of fingerprints. His work was largely unheard of in Europe until Sir Edward Henry devised a fingerprint classification system, still used today to categorize sets of fingerprints and store them for easy retrieval.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...Brandon Dutson
Intro to forensic science
Professor Crook
March 25, 1013
Fingerprinting
For more than a century, fingerprints, palm prints and sole prints have been used as powerful identification tools by law enforcement agencies. Prosecutors have found few scientific procedures to be more powerful than the fingerprint. Fingerprinting also known as “friction ridge analysis,” is a forensic method that involves examiners to compare the details of an unknown print left behind from the oil or residue left on ones fingers or palms and compare it with a set or a database of known prints. Fingerprints have been sworn to be Infallible for over a century but many have often wondered how accurate fingerprinting really is.
The details on the prints include ridges, loops, whorls and other points of similarities that differ and distinguish one from another. It has been said in past times that no two fingerprints are the same. Fingerprints between two family members are no more similar then between two strangers. Fingerprints remain unchanged during a person’s lifetime and typical have as many as 150 ridge characteristics.
In the past, individual prints were compared to prints on file by fingerprint examiners. New technology enables computers to do this work. Computers are able to scan and digitally encode fingerprints so that they can be subject to high speed computer processing. Automated fingerprint identification uses automatic...

...Should all people convicted of a crime have their DNA fingerprints stored on a database?\
A DNA fingerprint is the same for every cell, organ and tissue in an organism. DNA fingerprinting has many uses, some of which include providing the evidence needed to solve criminal investigations, determining genetic relationships and solving paternity disputes. DNA fingerprinting has many benefits in the use of criminal investigations as it can provide the evidence to solve crimes and current mysteries, can free innocent suspects and can also cut out a great deal of investigation time. However, there are also many negative issues involved in the matter, such as privacy concerns, which may lead to discrimination and the mishandling or misinterpretation of the DNA evidence. Currently, there is a database where the DNA from samples collected at crime scenes is sored, although many believe that all people convicted of a crime should have their fingerprint stored on there. This raises the question “should all people convicted of a crime have their DNA fingerprints stored on a database?”
As everybody’s DNA is unique, DNA fingerprinting is rapidly becoming the main source for identifying and distinguishing amongst individuals. The structure of DNA is a double helix shape made up of a phosphate sugar backbone, which consists of a sequence of complimentary bases held together by weak hydrogen bonds. A DNA fingerprint is manufactured by first...

...﻿
DNA FINGERPRINTING LAB REPORT
DNA contains genetic material and information that makes up each individual trait. Every person can be identified by providing his or her genetic information based on a particular DNA strand. DNA information is an effective way of identifying persons if it is used properly. It is used to identify humans in different situations such as crime scenes, accident scenes, paternity testing, soldier remain identification, inheritance claims, missing person investigations, and convicted felon databases. Although there are different ways to identify DNA, the most common method is DNA fingerprinting. The process that was used in the lab experiment was gel electrophoresis.
Before DNA fingerprinting, a different method called Blood typing was used. This method was used to identify people by taking a sample of dried blood. But this method had some disadvantages; for example, many people who receive blood by transfusionundergo changes in their blood characteristics,making difficult the blood typing; also, blood typing required an amount of body fluid that sometimes was not enough or that other times was deteriorated, making it impossible to do the blood typing. So, because of these disadvantages, DNA fingerprinting began to be used as a forensic tool.
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFPL’s) is a restriction enzyme that recognizes a specific strand of the nucleotides in DNA. This...

...DNA as a Key Witness
Criminals, often unknowingly, leave parts of themselves behind. These pieces are not always visible to the untrained eye. Hair, skin, blood, and fingerprints all contain elements that are unique to each person. It is with DNA testing and fingerprinting, that criminals can be identified and crimes can be linked. This system of testing and matching has become the “most essential and reliable method of catching criminals” in the United States (Lynch 67). Advancing technology is not only solving crimes, but also deterring them.
DNA profiling, genetic fingerprinting, and DNA testing are all names for the same process and are used interchangeably. These terms all refer to the technique used by scientists to identify and match the genetic code (or DNA) of people. DNA is highly similar among humans, but there are always pieces of the coding that are distinguishably different and exclusive to each person, aside from identical twins (Lazer 9). Samples of genetic code are logged into easily searchable, computerized files called databases; searching these databases with DNA found at a crime scene will result in a match if the DNA of the criminal was previously entered.
To begin genetic fingerprinting, a technician will procure a sample of DNA. This piece of genetic coding will be referred to as a "reference sample" (Lynch 12). There are many ways to obtain DNA. For criminal coding the most effective and proven...

...This lab must be typed. Title DNA Fingerprinting Purpose Why are we doing this lab Background 1. What are restriction enzymes 2. When added to a DNA sample, what do restriction enzymes do 3. What do you call the specific sequence of bases the enzyme is searching for 4. What is a restriction digestion 5. What is the purpose of the water bath 6. The electrophoresis apparatus creates an electrical field with positive and negative poles at the ends of the gel. DNA molecules are negatively charged. To which electrode pole of the electrophoresis field would you expect DNA to migrate Explain. 7. What color represents the negative pole 8. After DNA samples are loaded into the sample wells, they are forced to move through the gel matrix. What size fragments (large vs. small) would you expect to move toward the opposite end of the gel most quickly Explain. 9. Which fragments (large vs. small) are expected to travel the shortest distance from the well Explain. Materials List everything you used in the lab. Procedure List steps according to the handout. Day 1 and Day 2 Day 1 Observations 1. Describe the DNA samples. 2. Describe the restriction endonuclease mix. 3. Can you see any evidence to indicate that your samples of DNA were fragmented or altered in any way by the addition of EcoRl/Pstl Explain. 4. In the absence of any visible evidence of change, is it still possible that the DNA samples were fragmented Explain your reasoning. 5. After the restriction...

...Ballistic Fingerprinting
The second amendment to the United States Constitution states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The different interpretations and views on this amendment have caused it to become a very controversial and hotly debated topic. One of the newest controversies surrounding the topic of gun control is a process known as "ballistic fingerprinting." While the process initially seems like a good idea, it can clearly be seen to be both expensive and ineffective.
Ballistic fingerprinting is basically a way to use fired bullets and shell casings in a way similar to the way that police departments use fingerprints found at a crime scene to identify criminals. The way the process works is that a record of the barrel of every gun is made; each barrel produces different markings on a bullet as the bullet spins through the barrel. The theory behind ballistic fingerprinting is that by keeping records of every gun made it will be possible to trace a bullet used in a crime to the gun that it was fired from so that the owner of the gun can be arrested. People who are pro-gun control argue that this process would be a common sense measure to deter crime and find criminals. This is a logical assumption, but upon further investigation it becomes clear that ballistic...

...THE BRAIN FINGERPRINTING TECHNOLOGY
1.BRAIN FINGERPRINTING:
Brain Fingerprinting is based on the principle that the brain is central to all human acts. In a criminal act, there may or may not be many kinds of peripheral evidence, but the brain is always there, planning, executing, and recording the crime. The fundamental difference between a perpetrator and a falsely accused, innocent person is that the perpetrator, having committed the crime, has the details of the crime stored in his brain, and the innocent suspect does not. This is what Brain Fingerprinting detects scientifically.
2.THE SECRETS OF BRAIN FINGERPRINTING:
2.1.MATCHING EVIDENCE AT THE CRIME SCENE WITH EVIENCE IN THE BRAIN:
When a crime is committed, a record is stored in the brain of the perpetrator. Brain Fingerprinting provides a means to objectively and scientifically connect evidence from the crime scene with evidence stored in the brain. (This is similar to the process of connecting DNA samples from the perpetrator with biological evidence found at the scene of the crime; only the evidence evaluated by Brain Fingerprinting is evidence stored in the brain.) Brain Fingerprinting measures electrical brain activity in response to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen, and reveals a brain MERMER (memory and encoding related multifaceted...

...﻿Samantha Meyer
Lesson Plan 8/Reflection #8
SCIE 376
This week, I taught a lesson about fingerprinting to my students and it went extremely well. The students were highly attentive, every student participated, and based off of my assessment, every student fully understood the topic. My lesson this week aligned with the scientific and engineering practices 1, 2, and 4. Practice 1 is asking questions, practice 2 is developing and using models, and practice 4 is analyzing and interpreting data. My lesson was structured to help students engage in these practices because I had discussion questions written in advance, the students created their own individual fingerprinting model, the students analyzed their fingerprints, and interpreted the information they learned further with more activities. I wrote several discussion questions to ask the students for every section of the lesson and made sure to have the lesson with me while I taught so I was able to refer to the lesson and ask the students all of the questions. This was extremely beneficial because the questions got students thinking, learning, and interacting with each other. The students developed a model by tracing their hand, taking their own fingerprints, and putting each fingerprint on the correct finger. When finished, the students each had a model of their own fingerprints. The students analyzed their model by labeling what type of fingerprint each of their fingers was on their model....