8 smart and sassy crime fiction writers dish on writing and life.
It's The View. With bodies.

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Molly D. Campbell murders her darlings... and slays us with her humor

HALLIE EPHRON:One of my favorite humorists Molly D. Campbell posted a hilarious take-down of writing rules on her blog, View from the Empty Nest. With her permission, today we're sharing it with our world.

CAUTION: Do not read while drinking a cup of tea.

MOLLY D. CAMPBELL:I
am a published author, so that makes me an authority on writing things,
doesn’t it? There are rules to follow. I try to follow them. One rule
that has me flummoxed is the current ban on adverbs. You read that
correctly. Correctly is an adverb. So how should I have said that just
then? You read that with accuracy? Bah.But since I plan to write more than one novel, and I am actually
(another adverb) a third of the way through my next one, I thought I
would share with you some of the no-nos in the author game. You know, so
you will be a better critic in the future. But be kind in those Amazon
reviews—some of them have been so harsh as to cause writers to
contemplate becoming auto mechanics and cocktail waitresses instead. But
I digress. You aren’t supposed to do that as a writer, either.

A cardinal rule of the writing business is “Show, don’t tell.” It
took me about three years to understand what this really means. I am
terrible at it. But the following are examples:

TELL: Audrey felt just sick about having to inform Robert that she
couldn’t possibly marry him. After all, she still got cold shivers when
she thought about Pierre. Pierre was the love of her life, and Audrey
believed with all of her heart that he would return from that trip down the Amazon River to discover the cure for arthritis.

SHOW: Audrey woke, her pillow damp with her tears. She put her hand
on her forehead, which throbbed from the dream that was so vivid. Pierre
was rowing towards her, his eyes full of terror. Suddenly, out of
nowhere, a giant boa constrictor reared out of the water, slithered onto
Pierre’s tiny boat, and enveloped him in a twisting death grip.

“Audrey, Audrey!” Pierre managed to cry, as the evil snake crushed the
life out of him. Audrey picked up her cell phone and punched the
“Robert” icon. “Hi, darling,” she said. “Oh yes, I will marry you!”

See? So much more literary.Another writers’ tip is to use dialogue, not description. Readers
tire of long passages full of poetic language, no matter how many hours
the author spent painting the scene for them and being vivid. Nope. We
would rather just move along. Let the characters move the plot, and
really, we don’t actually care what color the leaves were on the trees
that afternoon. For example:

DESCRIPTION: The sky darkened. The parched, mahogany leaves rattled
in the sudden breeze. Flora felt the goosebumps rise on her arms,
drawing the thin muslin wrap around her. Thunder rent the air with
dissonant anger.

Grant began to pack the picnic things into the basket,
but not before the huge, cold drops began to fall. The sky took on a
greenish hue as the lightning pierced the clouds. Grant seized the
picnic basket in one hand and extended his other out to the frightened
and shivering girl. As they hurtled toward the distant farm cottage, a
thunderclap nearly knocked them down.

DIALOGUE:“Shit, Flora, I think it’s going to rain! Hurry up and finish your sandwich. We need to get out of here!”

“Don’t be silly. It is just heat lightning. It happens all the time around here. Want a pickle?”

“For God’s sake, are you nuts? My cousin got struck by lightning
three years ago at the golf course, and he has been a sniveling idiot
ever since—you can stay as long as you want, but I am getting out of
here.”

“You are overreacting, as usual. Wait! Damn! My Sierra Mist just blew over! You may be right. Look at the sky—it’s puke green…”

Which book would you rather read? I thought so. So you see, we authors don’t just jot down whatever comes into our
heads. It’s a craft. Nay, an art form! We spend hours just sifting
through our heads for the right word. We agonize over those adjectives,
and we brutally eliminate those adverbs (oh, right—brutally is an
adverb). We struggle with realistic dialogue.

Yup. So right now I have to get back to Flora, Pierre and Robert.
Poor Pierre. That anaconda—or was it a boa constrictor—just sealed his
fate, and tonight, Robert is going to get lucky…

HALLIE: Did I warn you or what?

What do you think about "writing rules" and which ones do you violate with impunity?

ABOUT MOLLY D. CAMPBELL
Molly writes from her pantry, often in pajamas. She exercises
regularly, despite the fact that she has sustained numerous injuries
involving barbells and exercise balls. She successfully raised two
gorgeous daughters, who both pay their own bills. Molly can also be
found at: http://momswhoneedwine.com.

Molly is a two-time Erma Bombeck award winning
writer. She hosts her own intelligent and funny blog,
www.mollydcampbell.com, as well as writing for the popular international
web site "Moms Who Need Wine."

Her latest novel is "Keep the Ends
Loose," a wry and witty coming of age novel. Miranda Heath is a quirky
fifteen year-old with cinematic dreams and a safe, predictable family.
That is, until she decides to pull at the loose end that is the
estranged husband that her aunt never divorced. Warm, funny, and
uniquely perceptive, Her
short story collection began as a Twitter stream of character names
that she invented in her spare time, followed by a brief description:
"Loretta Squirrels beats her husband and makes moonshine." Molly then
decided to write a book about her characters. She teamed up with a
fantastic artist to bring them to life. The book soon became an Amazon
Pop Culture best seller.

Molly lives in Dayton, Ohio, the home of
Erma Bombeck. Molly makes regular pilgrimages to Erma's grave--for
inspiration and spiritual renewal. Molly also spends time petting her
five cats and plugging her ears. Her husband plays the accordion.

20 comments:

I have no idea about which writing rules ought to be broken [although the use of an occasional adverb doesn't seem too outrageous to me], but I do think that surely [oops] writers must know best . . . .

Frankly, I positively believe that adverbs, when used sparingly and judiciously, have a great deal to offer an otherwise overtly character-driven tale. And I LOVE Erma Bombeck--and didn't know Molly was the genius behind the mom's with wine blog. Looking forward to finding more of her work!

Hysterical. And I took your advice, no tea--coffee. It almost matches the wall color where I spewed it. Dang--blogger has no photo insert capability. I do have pix. All of these rules are probably true, and definitely made to be broken. Especially that adverb thing. The puke green sky--priceless. Thank you for sharing.

Love this--thanks Hallie and Molly! I can still remember one of my first writing teachers telling me I had one of the worst cases of adverbitis she'd ever seen:). It wasn't funny at the time, but it makes me aware of choosing them judiciously, carefully, methodically....

Okay, in support of the adverb police.... Here's an example of what drives me crazy:"That's great!" she said enthusiastically.But not much better: "That's great!" she said, jumping up and down and clapping.Sometimes the dialogue wants to stand alone.

But I like:"That's great," she said, swirling her wine and avoiding eye contact.Better than "That's great," she said pensively.

There is nothing better than starting the day with a giggle and this was PERFECT! Thank you!

My thoughts on writing rules are that what works for one writer is not necessarily what works for all writers, just like what works for some readers is not going to work for all. So write what's in your heart. Break rules. Have fun. Chances are that a lot of readers will love it - they do not, after all, know that there are rules that you're supposed to be following.

Molly, I need to start looking for your work! Thanks for some good laughs.

I do think writing rules change over the years. When I was a freshman in college back in the Dark Ages, our English Composition professor taught us that all the writing rules we learned in high school were wrong, wrong, wrong. In the past few years many articles I've read about writing stressed that the rules I learned in college were wrong, wrong, wrong. Yikes.

If the use of adverbs is such a terrible practice (it doesn't bother me at all to read adverbs used the write/right way!) then ban all the books that use them, and fine public speakers of adverbs for the use of improper language:-) Yeah, that will never happen.

My writing brain always has this second track going while I'm working. NO! THATS TELLING, I yell at myself. Every day. Ah.

The only rule that I really...adhere to, maybe, I think, is avoiding portents. Little did she know, had she but known, all that.

ANd the adverb thing is a point of view problem, right? I mean--if you're in the head of a person, that person isn't thinking: I'll say that enthusiastically. Judiciously is shorter, but: she searched the green beads, one by one, examining each, and keeping only the biggest is better. At least, easier to picture. But I love that we THINK about this, and that's the point, right?

The thing about adverbs is they are shortcuts, economical ways of expressing an idea. And the problem for a lot of us who started life as technical writers (I know you're out there) is that adverbs are a technical writers friend. Because you're trying to make it short and clear. Technical writing also has no narrative voice (usually) or viewpoint. So when you make the transition to writing fiction you've got a lot of habits to break.

I love adverbs, though I try to use them judiciously. I love dialogue tags: "he roared, he bellowed, she murmured, she whispered, she stuttered" but once a chapter seems to be about right. Your examples of show don't tell were right on.

Adverbs don't bother me at all. However, I've read books where the author needed to practice Show don't Tell, and it was painfully obviously. Your example here of Tell is not what people are talking about when they say that.

And, depending on the novel, I actually liked both the descriptive and the narrative take on that scene. I've read books where the author did try to narrate through dialogue, and it was awkward and weird.

Still, overly long description for the sake of showing off how wonderful the writer is at painting a scene are boring and do slow things down.

Yes, I'm arguing for and against those rules. Well, except the adverb rule. I really don't mind adverbs.

Thanks for the laugh this morning! Too true. And yet, I do like some description in what I read. Visual and sensory scene setting can really enhance a..well, a scene. I like it in my own writing too, but am ever on the alert to NOT OVERDO IT (as one often does.) One or two perfect details, not a page of mediocre ones. That the ticket. Hmmm. Maybe that needs to go on my computer screen

Okay, I did snort my tea.... So funny! And, yes, I agree that one can use too many adverbs. BUT adverbs are a perfectly good part of the English language and a ban on adverbs is just silly. I think this trend may come directly from Stephen King's rules on writing.

I also like good, fast-paced dialog, but I'm writing novels, not screenplays, and descriptions have their place.

Ha. I read between swallows of coffee. No casualties here. Rules? We don't need no stinkin' rules. Fortunately I'm a reader, not a writer. Erma Bombeck was one of my favorites. I always read her column. Good on you Molly.

Jungle Red Writers has been named one of the top 101 Best Websites for Writers by Writers Digest, one of the top 50 mystery blogs by CourtReporter, and one of the top 100 creative writing blogs by Best Colleges Online