David Eisler, Walton, stated he represented the Siuslaw
Stewardship Group.† He said there were
e-mails sent out by Cascade Pacific RC & D about funding availability.† He said it spells out the opportunity for
watershed restoration.† He said there
might be areas the County hadnít thought of for funding opportunities.† He noted they address all types of watershed
health issues.† He said they have
concerns about noxious weeds and those are things the County could apply
for.† He said the first round of funding
is completed.† He noted they did more
than $123,000 in funding.† He said they
had money left over and the $200,000 is rolled over into the next funding
opportunity, for October 15.† He noted
the total value for projects was $298,000.†
He said they had 59% in-kind support beyond that.

Rob Handy, Eugene, asked if it was a good thing for
the local jurisdictions and the County to give more control of state highways
that pass through the county to ODOT.†
He said there were† also concerns
in Eugene about how the interface takes place.†
He said Mayor Torrey raised concerns about whether ODOT was doing a
disservice to the City of Eugene by dragging out decisions about the West
Eugene Parkway.† He asked if ODOT had
released the West Eugene Parkway re-evaluation report.† He asked if Morrisonís recent letter to
Interior Secretary Norton about the land, water and conservation fund
properties in West Eugene reflected Board policy.† He thought it was important to maintain flexibility to have local
control.† He asked the Board to delay
the decision on the freight route until they have answers.

Laurie Segel, Eugene, asked about the process and
progress on the planning commission vacancies.†
She said staff indicated they would follow up with the Board and get
back to someone at the planning commission level.

Dwyer indicated that
he and Morrison have a list of applicants and they will conduct interviews.

Morrison stated she
had finished her selection two weeks ago.†
She noted that Dwyer was ill and out hunting and he was just reviewing
his list.

Sorenson stated that
normally the Board has had a discussion of who would be on the interview
committee.† He thought they would have
the discussion.† He said in the past the
Board had appointed him or others and he thought this was outside of the normal
way they had done it.† He said the
commissioners that were doing the interviews were not authorized to do it.† He thought it was important to follow the
policy they had before.† He said he is
the liaison to the planning commission.†
He thought if the Board was going to appoint two commissioners, that the
rest of them should have a role in making that decision.† He wanted to make sure they followed
previous practice on having the Board nominate who would do the interviews.

Dwyer said he would
relinquish his responsibility in doing the interview. He said he didnít
volunteer for this and he didnít have any strong feelings about the interview
process.

Green said there has
not been a board policy, but a board practice.†
He said as chair, the planning director came to him and let him know
about the vacancy.† He asked Morrison,
whom he thought was the planning commission liaison, to ask another
commissioner to participate.† She asked Dwyer.† Green said it was at that time the packet
was given to Morrison and Juanita Kirkham was made aware of the process and
Dwyer was ill at the time.† He said
there was nothing inconsistent with how it was done.

MOTION:† to
move to have Green and Hampton interview the applicants and report back.

Sorenson MOVED.

Motion failed for no
second.

Hampton wanted
Sorenson to do the interviews.

Sorenson wanted
Morrison to do it and report back to the Board.† He wanted another commissioner to work with him on it.

Green said they are
trying to accommodate citizens.† He
commented that Sorenson was trying to take the position that he should pick
someone and drag out the selection.† He
wanted to take care of the business they need to.† Green said he would help Morrison with the interviews.

4. EMERGENCY
BUSINESS

ORDER 04-10-13-12 Scheduling a Hearing on the Appeal
of the Sheriff's Recommendation on the Liquor License Application of Lona and
Mike Owens (Dexter Lake Cafe).

Green said he
received a letter from a Michael B. Owens who was denied a liquor license
appeal.† He noted that Rob Rockstroh had
agreed to hear the appeal but he is unavailable.† He said in consultation with County Administration and Legal
Counsel, it was determined that Jeff Towery would be a good choice.† He noted this was a board order to do this
so they could expedite the appeal process.†
He noted the appeal is set for October 26, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.

MOTION:† to
approve ORDER 04-10-13-12.

Dwyer MOVED, Hampton
SECONDED.

VOTE: 5-0.

5. COMMISSIONERS'
REMONSTRANCE

None.

6. COMMISSIONERS'
BUSINESS

None.

7. COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION

a. Announcements

Van Vactor announced
that Anette Spickard was awarded the position of Deputy Assessor.† He noted they awarded Tanya Heatonís job to
Barry Crook in Texas.† He said he didnít
want to replace Spickardís position until they know more about the upcoming
budget.† He noted that next week he,
Tony Bieda and John Arnold would be traveling to Washington, D.C. for the
renewal of the Secure Rural Schools Act.

8. PUBLIC
WORKS

a. ORAL REPORT BACK
AND ORDER 04-8-25-9/In the Matter of Authorizing the County
Administrator to Sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Regarding the West
Eugene Parkway (NBA & PM 8/25/04).

Ollie Snowden,
Public Works, recalled in August they were in front of the Board with a request
from ODOT that the Board of Commissioners authorize Van Vactor to execute a MOU
with ODOT and the City of Eugene that would facilitate construction of Unit 1 a
of the West Eugene Parkway.† He said the
Board declined to take action on September 25†
because they wanted responses to Rob Zakoís (1000 Friends of Oregon)
questions.† They also wanted to see what
the City of Eugene did.† He noted the
council discussed the item and the city manager has subsequently executed that
agreement for the city.

Snowden asked the
Board if they wanted to have the County as a signature to the MOU or not.† He noted the Eugene City Council gave
direction that they donít expect the city to be the one who has to pay for
construction or maintenance of Unit 1 a.

Green explained the
MOU sets the stage for negotiations to discuss the maintenance issue.† He said it is clear that in order for ODOT
to maintain or keep it as part of their authority, it needs to meet their
policy in terms of the design.† He said
they are discussing whether Unit 1 a. should be maintained either by one
jurisdiction or both.† He said it might
end up that ODOT retains possession of it.

Snowden said the MOU
is the notice of the Boardís intention to negotiate in good faith with ODOT
over the jurisdiction and maintenance of Unit 1 a. and Unit 1 d.† He noted the binding IGA comes next.† He explained the MOU says that they will sit
down at the table with the city and ODOT and they will work in good faith to
come up with an IGA that defines roles and responsibilities.† He added that the Board doesnít have to sign
the IGA.

Dwyer didnít want to
pay for it or maintain it.

Snowden said if the
Board doesnít have any interest in accepting jurisdiction of Unit 1 a. or any
interest in facilitating construction of the West Eugene Parkway, they
should† not sign the MOU.

Dwyer commented he
voted to support the West Eugene Parkway, and wasnít opposed to it.† He was opposed to the constant changes that
are changing the costs and responsibilities.

Snowden said if the
Board is not opposed to the West Eugene Parkway in concept, he thought there
would be value in signing the MOU because it brings the Board to the table and
it could exert leadership in the discussions if they want to do that.

Green said he would
be willing to sign the MOU.† He
commented the traffic problems going from east to west are still there.† He wanted to direct staff to advocate that
they do not take possession or have maintenance for it.† He thought Lane County should be at the
table to talk about the arrangement.† He
said the project is now at the federal level and it needs to be worked out with
ODOT and the feds, not with Lane County.

Dwyer didnít like
the terms and conditions.

Snowden commented
that the County does not have to sign the IGA.†
He said the MOU said that the County would be sitting at the table and
they would discuss the conditions of the IGA.†
He said if the County wanted to walk away from the table, he didnít see
anything where there would be any adverse consequences.

Dwyer wanted to
strike number 2.

MOTION:† to
move to not approve this order.

Sorenson MOVED,
Dwyer SECONDED.

Sorenson commented
the purpose of the MOU is to facilitate the delivery of the project.† He said it would either get delivered to the
County or the city.† He said if it is
the County, then he was against it.† He
said if it is the city, then he didnít think the County should be in the
agreement.† He didnít think the County
was interested in getting a portion of†
the stateís responsibility.

Hampton was against
number 2.† He thought discussing this
would be for the transfer, and if they are not interested, then why were they
interested in sitting down at all?

Morrison supported
the MOU.

Dwyer was against
this.

Snowden asked the
Board how they wanted him to participate in any discussions that the city and
ODOT has.

Green said that Lane
County shouldnít have a presence.

Snowden explained
that they already had an executed IGA from 1978 that stated the County would
take the bypass sections of West 11 and Beltline if the western extension were
built.† He said at some point the County
would have to have a discussion with the state about the existing
agreement.† He said from this point
forward, any discussions that ODOT has with the city on the West Eugene
Parkway, that the Board expects staff not to attend.

Dwyer said the
County should not commit any resources.†
He was not against the parkway.† †

Sorenson didnít want
the board order approved.† He thought
Snowden should still attend the meeting.†
He didnít think the argument was made for this MOU as presented today,
that Lane County have an interest in having a facilitated transfer to the
County.† He said if the city wants to
enter into the MOU then that is a city issue.

Green recalled these
were the same terms and conditions as on August 25.† He noted that Rob Zako submitted questions and they were
answered.† He said the hesitancy to sign
it back then was because procedurally they wanted the city to go forward and
take action.† He noted that all of that
had been done.

VOTE: 3-2 (Green, Morrison dissenting).

b. DISCUSSION &
ACTION/Road Maintenance Consolidation Audit.

Snowden explained
the Board had discussed this over a period of time going back to last
year.† He noted the last time they
discussed it was in April.† He said at
that point most of the cities who were present at the meeting indicated a
willingness to participate, non-financially in some review of the efficiency
and effectiveness of how they deliver road maintenance services.† He included comments about the road
maintenance audit they had in 1997. He said at that time the County hired a
company out of Portland to look at specifics about the way they were performing
maintenance on Lane County roads, but a part of the study was looking at the
feasibility of consolidation of services with ODOT District 5.† He noted that audit cost about
$100,000.† He said they ran out of time
and money to do a detailed report on the specific efficiencies that could be
gained through consolidation.† He said their
conclusion was that consolidation with ODOT District 5 had substantial
obstacles to it and they were unable to quantify the benefits of
consolidation.† He added they went on to
say that in the future there would be opportunities for consolidation if there
were some potential cost savings.

Snowden recalled in
1988, Jackson County and ODOT did an extensive investigation in looking at
consolidation of road maintenance operations.†
He said that study concluded that within eight years of consolidation, they
would save about 6.6% annually.† He
thought there was potential for some savings by consolidating road maintenance
operations but there are obstacles.† He
added the savings they get would not be such that they wipe out the Eugene
deficit they have with maintenance and preservation.† He identified three levels of study that would look at
consolidation.† He said that included a
work plan and a list of other questions that the Board needs to provide
direction on before they move ahead with an RFP.† He said they could have an executive level consolidation scoping
where they would hire an engineering or managing consultant that has a
background in looking at this type of study on what Lane County would look
like.† He hoped they could do the study
for less than $50,000.

Morrison said if
they go forward with this, she wanted to make sure that they implement the
plan.† She thought there were some
savings.

Snowden indicated
that he only wrote the scope of work for Eugene, Springfield and Lane
County.† He asked if all the small
cities should be included or just one representative small city.

Morrison wanted two
rural cities.

Snowden commented
that if the Secure Rural Schools Act funding goes away,† they would face the same difficulties the
cities have in trying to get the legislature to deal with the funding problem
on a statewide basis.† He said if Lane
County is going to look at local option fees, that a study of this type might
be a prerequisite to going ahead with a countywide registration fee or gas tax.† He didnít think they would find that there
would be inefficiencies.† He commented
it was the labor costs over times that are the ongoing savings.

Dwyer said if they
are going to do an audit that it would need to lead them to some type of
conclusion that would be able to show savings and efficiencies.† He agreed if they are going to do it that
they should do it right.† He wanted the
executive audit.

Sorenson† commented that audits should be under the
authority of their auditor.† He thought
this should be a function of Kay Blackburn, Internal Auditor, and what she
thinks is appropriate.† He thought this
should go through Finance and Audit.† He
said that each of the commissioners has to be concerned with the impact of what
County government does beyond their district.

Snowden said that an
audit has a structured way of approaching the investigation.† He said they have guidelines and the promise
is they would get a study that is high on integrity that the auditors are not
going to be influenced by people they talk to.†
He said they would give an independent analysis.† He noted when they did their audit in 1997,
they asked for a true audit and that gave them a smaller pool of consultants to
select from.† He said that meant the one
they selected had a lot of work to do.

Blackburn stated the
advantage of doing a full audit in accordance with government auditing
standards is that there are standards for professionalism for the auditors for
education, and support for their conclusions.†
She said if what they are looking for is more of a high level executive
summary scoping study, if they put out an RFP, they are limiting the pool of
people who would be eligible to respond. She asked the Board if they wanted a
consultant study at more of a high level executive study or the government
audit report.

Dwyer and Morrison
wanted to go with the executive audit.

Green supported
going with the full scoping audit.† He
commented they could do this and the work could be done but it takes the
political will of the Board and leadership in the jurisdiction to make it
happen.

Dwyer thought that
resistance would be at other political levels.†
He said they are trying to gather the information.† He said they need to take a leadership role.

Green said they
could take the data and show the effectiveness and efficiencies, but someone
might come to the Board and complain and the Board would then change its policy
or direction.

Hampton preferred
more of an effort spent on the political will first in trying to assess how
much interest the other agencies have in them doing this before they spend the
money.

Green indicated the
Board wanted to go forward with an audit.

Dwyer thought they
needed to test the political will before they spend the money.

With regard to
political will, Morrison said they could do the outreach but by the time this
comes back, the political will would have changed.† She thought they should first go to the political bodies and then
make a decision on which ones they would do.

Green said they should
engage the stakeholders in this effort after the first of the† year.

Van Vactor asked if
they should put out an RFP and get responses so they have a better defined
product they could show.

With regard to the
1997 audit, Snowden explained it took six to eight months to do with a staff of
people.† He thought it would be too time
consuming a project for Blackburn.

Green wanted
Blackburn involved.

Sorenson suggested
that Blackburn work on this because if it is going to be an audit it should be
under her functions.† He said she could
think about the best way to do it and come back and tell the Board what she
wants to do.

Snowden thought the
Board, as elected officials, should be talking with their colleagues.† He said there was inertia to keep the status
quo.

Dwyer said they
should draft a letter at the Board level saying they are contemplating
designing a way to establish efficiencies that would culminate in an audit and
if it could be shown (in an objective fashion) ways to save money or cost effectiveness
in efficiencies, then they would be willing to consider it.

MOTION:† to
draft a letter at the Board level stating they are contemplating a way to
establish efficiencies that would culminate in an audit.

Dwyer MOVED,
Sorenson SECONDED.

VOTE: 5-0.

c. DISCUSSION/Compliance
Program.

Jeff Towery, Land
Management, said this initially came out of a conversation that occurred at the
Board level in June.† He added it also
came out of a request for a discussion about greater involvement, better collaboration
and better use of Land Management and Waste Management activities and services
in an effort to deal with issues of illegal dumping and waste and
garbage-related compliance efforts.† He
said the initial request was from Finance and Audit to give an update on the
status of meth lab properties in Lane County.†
He said that existing inventory could be dealt with in the next five
months.† He noted they didnít bring
their new compliance technicians on board until the first week of September and
they thought a six month period of time would be adequate to get certificate of
fitness on all of the existing properties.†
He said they are working with their staff and IS to do a better job of
providing public information about the contaminated sites and placing them on
the Countyís website.

Towery noted that
over the past five years they had seen a significant increase in compliance
related revenue in the program.† He said
there is one issue of being able to do double planning and sanitation in the
instance of a compliance case.† He said
they are forecasting it to be a small impact on the program, $5,000 to $10,000
per year but they have the ordinance and the board order coming up.† He expected that ordinance would come to the
board in November.† He thought they
should re-visit some issues that the task force addressed when they met.† He said they should focus on protecting
citizensí health, life safety and the environment.† He said other goals are achieving voluntary compliance instead of
imposing fines, the utilization of realistic and consistent practices using
priorities and incentive programs, and the recognition that the County has and
is expected to have a limited code enforcement resource.† He said they identified issues for future
consideration.

Dwyer said it was
helpful to have these policies but they still have a problem in East and West
Lane County with garbage.† He said they
need a fix and they need to have the resources to do it.† He thought the Board should adopt a 50-cent
per load surcharge on dump fees that is dedicated to compliance and clean
up.† He said the recovery costs from
liens should be dedicated to replenishing that fund, less the cost to recover
and the legal fees associated with it.†
He wanted to know† how much money
the 50-cent surcharge† would bring
in.† He wanted to establish a fund that
is not out of the general fund but it is from garbage and the clean up that is
related.

Morrison asked if
there was any timeline DEQ could impose after a property had been identified
through law enforcement action.

Towery said it is
the Department of Health that issues the certificate of fitness on a
property.† He said they decide whether
or not the property is clean.

Morrison wanted to
become more aggressive with liened properties. She asked why they should go
forward with this action if they have no intentions of enforcing the conditions
of the Board and staff.

Sorenson commented
that the issues of garbage and criminal activity are important to the public
safety, livability and health for the community.† He thought it was important they give responses.† He said they have to step up their
activities.† He asked what it would take
to double the FTE workload for the people who are doing the compliance
work.†† He wanted to know what a fee
increase would be on a per ton basis so they are distributing the costs across
the users of the system.† He didnít
think they could have a financial gain with a delay in compliance.† He thought they needed to have a more
rigorous examination of the type of liens they are issuing and on a more
consistent basis, foreclose on those liens in conjunction with a pilot
program.† With complaints versus
control, he didnít think they should solely focus on complaints.† He thought patrol had to be part of it.† He thought Lane Countyís policy should be
built around a voluntary compliance.† He
said they need to have an open friendly atmosphere at the outset.† He commented that a lot of people want to
comply, but they donít know what to do.†
He said if that is true and they are willing to accept a certain number
of wrongdoers as part of that, then they should do it.† He said after the initial time they should
move into a more aggressive posture than in the past.† He wanted to see them move in a direction of using the lien dollars
to a higher percentage than they are currently doing.† He thought they should empower citizens to enforce Lane Countyís
Land Management Division regulations.

Hampton said his
number one concern is the speed in which they are enforcing things.† With regard to compliance, he thought if
they could have a quick initial contact, they would get a certain percentage of
people to comply right away.† He agreed
if it doesnít happen in the beginning then they get more aggressive.† He thought that there should be guidelines
with realistic time expectations.† He
thought there should be someone who would preview the work to make sure that
everything is in order so it would go through the whole process.

Green wanted to
reinforce 5 a. and thought they could do that with a change in policy.† He thought adding 50 cents a dump load could
be an option to get more dollars.† He
wanted to strengthen the policies that were already in place to get the
compliance that is necessary.

Morrison thought
they had already approved the pilot program.

Towery indicated
that three of the four sites they identified ended up being cleaned or changed
ownership.† He said the one in Alvadore
was the one remaining.† He recalled they
invested a little of time and money in closing Saginaw Mobile Home park.† He said the issue of the pilot project got
set aside for more pressing issues.

Dwyer concurred with
what Sorenson said.† He thought they
needed the program.† He wanted the money
to be generated back to that fund and not the general fund.

d. FIRST READING AND
SETTING SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING/ Ordinance No. PA 1218/Adopting
the Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan as a Refinement Plan of
the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) for
Application Outside the Springfield City Limits and Within the Metro Plan
Boundary and Adopting a Severability Clause (A Refinement Plan of the Metro
Plan, Chapter III-H Parks and Recreation Facilities Element, and Statewide Goal
8-Recreational Needs)† (Second Reading
and Public Hearing: October 28, 2004, 7:00 pm, Springfield Library Meeting
Room)

MOTION:† to
approve a First Reading and Setting a Second Reading and Public Hearing on Ordinance
PA 1218 for October 28, 2004 at 7:00 p.m.

1) ORDER 04-10-13-1/In
the Matter of Awarding a Contract to Oregon Psychiatric Partners, LLP to Serve
on the Lane County Managed Health Provider Panel for the Period October 1, 2004
Through September 30, 2005.

2) ORDER 04-10-13-2/In
the Matter of Delegating Authority to the County Administrator to Sign a
Contract with Eugene School District 4J for School Based Health Clinic Service
in the Amount of $105,238.

3) ORDER 04-10-13-3/In
the Matter of Awarding a Contract to White Bird Clinic in the Amount of
$166,130 for a Mental Health Crisis Services for the Period October 1, 2004
Through September 30, 2005.

D. Management
Services

1) ORDER 04-10-13-4/In
the Matter of Correcting Order No. 04-5-12-17 Creating a Classification
and Salary Range for Dental Hygienist.

E. Public Works

1) ORDER 04-10-13-5/In
the Matter of Accepting the Offer from Eric A. Eakin and Betty L. Bissell to
Purchase the Property Located at 88660 McVay Highway, Eugene, Oregon.

2) ORDER 04-10-13-6/In
the Matter of Releasing, Dedicating and Accepting a Parcel of County Owned Real
Estate, as a Public Road. (17-04-12) (Helen Street).

3) ORDER 04-10-13-7/In
the Matter of Releasing, Dedicating and Accepting a Parcel of County Owned Real
Estate, as a Public Road. (17-04-12-34) (Helen Street) (Co. Rd. No. 1613).

MOTION:† to
approve the Consent Calendar.

Morrison MOVED,
Sorenson SECONDED.

VOTE: 4-0 (Hampton out of room).

10. DISTRICT
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

a. ORDER 04-10-13-8/In
the Matter of Approving a Two-Year Contract Amendment in an Amount Not to
Exceed $118,750 with Sacred Heart Medical Center to Provide Morgue Services for
the Medical Examinerís Office in the Lane County District Attorneyís Office.

Tony Bieda, Intergovernmental
Relations Manager, reported the Legislative Committee met on an emergency basis
because Lane County Elections had been notified that the Secretary of State was
in the process of changing rules that would require an administrative recount
to occur after the November 2 election, but before the certification, adding an
additional resource to County Elections for no apparent gain or immediate
need.† He noted Annette Newingham,
Elections, had already been engaged in this issue. He stated that Newingham
thought they should first see if the Board of Commissioners agreed with the
direction that the County clerks were going with the rules.† He said the rules are requiring an
administrative recount to occur after the election and before certification of
the vote without any of the cost being borne by the state or identifying where
those resources would come from.

Bieda noted the
Legislative Committee met, reviewed the proposed amendments, and produced a
draft letter outlining the basis for the proposed amendments.† That is before the Board today.

Sorenson asked what
the cost would be to Lane County.

Bieda said it would
be a minimum of $3,500 for additional staff time.

Sorenson said he
called Bill Bradbury, Secretary of State, to ask about this item. Sorenson
noted that Bradbury said it was an inexpensive way to determine the accuracy of
an election.† He added that it would be
to the benefit of Lane County.† He said
if they were to do it, that they could prove the elections were accurate.† He didnít think it would hurt Lane County to
do this.† He was concerned about the
Board taking a position opposing these rules when they are intended to give the
public greater confidence in the outcome of the election.

Newingham said that
cost was a concern.† She noted that Lane
County prints their ballots so all the precincts are on the ballot.† She indicated it means they donít have to
sort by precincts, they could count the ballots by ballot counters.† She said there is savings on having to sort
them manually into the precinct and it means timelier returns† She said if they have to give results by
precinct, they would have to sort all ballots and it would take a week to hand
count one precinct.† She added the way
it is written now, they would have to do it prior to certifying the election
results.† She said they donít have all
the ballots counted by the tenth day after the election.† She said they would be in conflict with the
other ways they audit the results before they certify the results.† She said she would be concerned as an
election official that she would be stretching herself thin and that she could
possibly make a mistake.

Green said the
recommendation is for the letter to go forward.

Newingham indicated
the two recommendations are to make the language changes suggested to say
ďafter the certification process in a more controlled fashionĒ and then to
clarify who was paying for that.

Morrison was
concerned about going forward once the rule is in place, that those costs would
escalate beyond what they are looking toward and then Lane County would be
stuck.† She wanted to find a way to cap
the cost within the rule making process.

Sorenson thought
this would assure the public that they are getting accurate results from
elections.

Newingham said they
were being supportive by suggesting the changes.† She thought there might be some misconceptions.† She said that all counties in Oregon do
optical scan.† She added if they do a
partial recount and there is some change to reflect the voter intent, they
might miss something.† She added that
anytime an election is within one-fifth of one percent, there is an automatic
recount and the counties do have to pay for those.† She said they didnít support this as it could backfire.† She thought the one-fifth of one percent was
a definitive way and she was supportive of that.

Green asked if there
was support for Green to sign the letter.

MOTION:†† to
move to send the letter.

Morrison MOVED,
Dwyer SECONDED.

VOTE: 3-1 (Sorenson dissenting, Hampton out of
room).

13. MANAGEMENT
SERVICES

a. ORDER 04-10-13-10/In
the Matter of Creating the Classification and Salary Range for Accountant.

MOTION:† to
approve ORDER 04-10-13-10.

Morrison MOVED,
Dwyer SECONDED.

VOTE: 4-0 (Hampton out of room).

14. CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE BOARD

None.

15. COMMISSIONERS'
ANNOUNCEMENTS

Green announced the
Junction City jail tour would take place on October 20 at 1:30 p.m.†† He added that they were going to have a
meeting with the Coburg City Council on October 19.† He said no one was available for the meeting so they decided to
change the date of the meeting.† He
noted there is a Budget Committee meeting on October 26.

16. EXECUTIVE
SESSION as per ORS 192.660

To take place after
the meeting.

17. OTHER
BUSINESS

ORDER 04-10-13-13 Settling Claims of Melinda Broome.

Green explained that this came out of Executive Session.

MOTION:† to
approve ORDER 4-10-13-13.

Morrison† MOVED,
Sorenson SECONDED.

VOTE: 4-0. (Hampton out of room).

There being no further business, Commissioner Green recessed
the meeting at 12:05 p.m.