> No. No, it wouldn't. Nim is neither case sensitive nor case insensitive, but
> rather it goes for Partial Case Insensitivity. Specifically, the first letter
> of an identifier is case sensitive, while the rest is not.

Wow. This means that Nim's rules changed after the last time I used it.
> You're technically right about your second example (myAccum == my_accum), but
> this is very bad coding. It's not Nim's fault if you named different
> variables so similarly.
You're entirely missing my point. I find that refusing to compile this code is
one of Nim's greatest strengths, exactly because it helps in preventing
variable name clashes.