If you want to know the "truth" about the RSD vs. Todd situation, a Justin Wayne video is probably not the best place to look. Todd recently posted a video on his channel showing that RSD is suing him for his use of the name "Todd Valentine" which they are arguing is their trademark. They are also suing him for $800,000, trying to get his YouTube channel deleted and other dirty tricks.

Strangely, in this video Justin is taking RSD's side and comparing Todd to Depak and his company, Wayne Dating to RSD, even though he admits his interview with Todd is partly what got Todd in trouble with RSD and that it might have played some role in Todd's eventual break with RSD, although this break was probably long overdue.

Last edited by beta on Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

"you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women." Tony Montana

As for RSD they are cannibalising themselves as they are the last pua company standing.

Good, I hope the whole entire scam PUA industry tears itself apart, so it can vanish off the face of this Earth.

This also proves that there is no "seduction community", because it when it comes to women and sex, most men will throw their fellow man under the bus, in order to get access to pussy, also the so called "seduction community" will always unfairly blame a man if he is having problems attracting for reasons beyond his control.Real/or genuine communities support and help their members, the so called "seduction community" does nothing of the sort.

Past a certain age, mid twenties to early thirties at the latest, if you haven't been living a very social lifestyle, you're screwed forever. American human life is structured in a way where the majority of people gain friends when you're forced to be with someone for a long period of time, and when they're still in their formative years. So high school, college, work, army, etc. And then in your mid-twenties people start leaving faster than you gain them and most people end up with very few friends at an old age. Normal people hate "losers" who complain because they don't want to feel guilty or sympathy for them. They realize on an instinctive level that empathy for "losers" will only drag them down so they have to find a way to simultaneously deny the losers their aid while still believing themselves to be good, friendly, wholesome people. The only way to do this is to imagine the "loser" as a villain who's responsible for his own misery. Otherwise the nice, inclusive, tolerant normal would have to face up to the fact that they aren't nice, inclusive or tolerant at all. We all understand that "just be social", "go outside", and "man up" are meaningless phrases. But people assume it's really that easy for everyone, and you must be lazy for not doing what's so simple for them. You will mostly get "advice" from people who have had normal social lives and cannot fathom being in your position. People who get invites to parties, monthly, weekly, or even daily, will advise you to "just say yes" when invited, thinking it's your fault for constantly saying "no". Because what kind of a person doesn't get invited to parties all the time, right? You won't receive any realistic suggestions. Instead, people will suggest that you do ridiculous public antics that they would never do and have also never made friends that way: go talk to a stranger at a cafe, approach someone reading a book in a bookstore, go for a walk in a park alone and start talking to someone sitting on a bench. Those are creepy, weird behaviors when ugly guys do them. You're living in a world that they will never understand. In their reality, you can go up to someone at a bar and strike up a conversation, easy as pie. If they don't like you, they calmly say so. If they do, you've made a new friend. But for you, there is no positive outcome. If they don't like you a scene is made and you become known as a creeper or something along those lines to the person and their friends. What makes these suggestions dangerous is that most of them are true in a completely trivial sense that misses any sense of context for the other person, so they sound reasonable to a "normal" person with underdeveloped empathy. It's like telling a homeless person to "just invest in a stock portfolio". Yes, investing in a stock portfolio would definitely solve the homeless guy's problems, but the advice is ignoring context. First: does he even know what a stock portfolio is? Most people like you don't have this problem, since they're knowledgeable about social situations and their own predicament by necessity. The second problem: does he have any money to invest in one? You have to have beginning capital, monetary or social, to make an investment. Obviously this is where a friendless loser will stumble, as he is not desirable in any way and he has nothing to offer. Third: he doesn't have a house or a phone to call someone and get things set up, he doesn't have the connections to a stock broker, he will probably get swindled since he's an easy target and so on. So even if you somehow overcome the second hurdle with superhuman willpower and you improve yourself enough to compensate for your position in society, this is where almost everyone will fail. They simply do not have the support structures that would enable them to do anything substantial in life.