<< But if you've published something and sell it publically, just what
kind of right to privacy to those contents can you reasonably expect? >>
I'm all about fair use and sampling. But the fact o fthe matter is its a
testament to lost ideals to think that an artist shouldn't be allowed to
change his mind. Isn;t that what we are saying here? that art is not a part of
the artist, but immediately available for anyone to use, particularly the
millions of mediocre wolves?

Salinger write it. Its his. If he doesn;t want it available he has as much
right to challenge its availablity as we have to challenge our rights to it.