Sunday, March 20, 2011

Why edit in place?

"It is very unlikely that, say, a million of us will go silent simultaneously. The organic nature of the project means that a large number of threads are active at all times. Each is driven by technology assisted curiosity and inquiry. The ideas are valuable before they are fully formed because of the interactivity with the cloud and people connected to it while the questioning is in process."

"There are some successful folk who do not subscribe to the 'they are stupid meme'. Furthermore, a subset profits from their reverence of and allegiance to the majority."

Suffering from eyes stuck shut, on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Gambling that the playing field is level enough to provide more safety than the dying regimes of an all but bygone era.

"Should we be concerned that the early morning tool seems to be fading?"

"I know I am a bit."

Pretty obvious that outright bribes would be too risky. Covert action is now anything but. No, the best methods are the ones that create a sustained productive conversations. And such a protocol is time consuming. The only way to keep pace is to pump up the volume. Many simultaneous threads with large numbers of trusted individuals.

The data is embedded in the 'blizzard'. Easier for those trained to look. More so for competent folks with compatible intent. Understand if you are leery and must leave. But know there is a good chance you will be back. If that were not the case, you would not have read this far.