Sunday, November 15, 2015

First Blood: Howard Nemaizer's Outrageous Lies Refuted

Howard
Nemaizer (using the pseudonym Nema) has published an
outrageous and defamatory article, filled with fabrications and
libelous falsehoods about Barbara Hartwell. This, along with
monstrous invasions of my privacy, in what is clearly a desperate
attempt to discredit me and to cover his own grievous injustices and
wrongdoing with additional lies.

This
is his attempt at justifying the unjustifiable, defending the
indefensible, because he has no legal or ethical ground whatsoever to
stand on.

Nemaizer
is in the wrong, has always been in the wrong. His wrongful
intrusions into my private affairs. His wrongful exploitation of the
name of a legitimate government whistleblower. His wrongful
appropriation of my unpublished and published material for
unconscionable, self-serving ends. His wrongful misrepresentations of
my name and website, in attempts to make it appear that I am
affiliated and in "partnership" with a number of
individuals, including himself and his program, "Truth Talk
News"; as well as with individuals whom I had clearly and
publicly denounced and exposed for their misdeeds.

The
fact of the matter is that I have never, at any time, been a
"partner" of Howard Nemaizer, nor of any of the persons
listed in his fraudulent notice, "TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH".
Nemaizer was well aware of this, via both my private and public
statements, as far back as 2012. Thus, he knowingly promoted false
information, in an attempt to deceive the public, which is
inexcusable by even the most lax standards of honesty or decency.

Since
December 15, 2014, I have made it crystal clear, through a number of
public notices and reports, in response to Nemaizer's public
misrepresentations, fraudulent notices and promotions, exploiting and
defaming the name of Barbara Hartwell, that I wanted all the false
information REMOVED, that which I specified beyond any doubt.

Nemaizer chose to disregard all such notices, all such demands, a
formal warning and most recently, a formal complaint.

Until
his latest defamatory article, filled with false witness against
Barbara Hartwell, many misstatements of fact and outrageously false
accusations, the one response by Nemaizer was a defamatory notice on
his website, Howard Nema dot com (February 2015), in which he made
false accusations against Barbara Hartwell and arrogantly stated that
he refused to remove the fraudulent material in connection with the
name and website of Barbara Hartwell.

He
actually stated that he expected to be PAID to remove his own false
and fraudulent notices. To cash in on his own wrongful actions, when
any decent, honorable person would have immediately removed the
fraudulent notices and false information, and not only that, would
have also issued a public retraction and apology, upon the first
request. And I did give him the opportunity to do that. Before I issued
the demands, I published a polite request, “with all due respect”,
which Howard Nemaizer chose to disregard.

These
facts alone should clearly indicate his dishonest and unprincipled
character and his utter lack of respect for the privacy, personal
boundaries and fundamental rights of others.

Such
hypocrisy is evident in his phony claims to be defending and
advocating for unalienable rights, as protected under the
Constitution. Nemaizer claims to be a "Constitutionalist".
He claims to be promoting "truth", as shown by the name of
his TV/radio program, "Truth Talk News". And pigs will take
flight into the wild blue yonder...

In
this report I will refute his most recent malicious lies, one by one,
and set the record straight. I will also (once again) expose the
truth about Howard Nemaizer's many wrongful and injurious actions
against Barbara Hartwell. Not by fabricating lies, as he does, but by
citing his own words, his many false statements.

It
has been my experience that dishonest persons always end up hanging
themselves with their own words, and thus discredit themselves. But
as I live and breathe, I will not stand by and allow such an
unrepentant malicious pathological liar to smear my good name.

Howard
Nemaizer has drawn first blood, as liars and wrongdoers always do.
And he will be held accountable, as God is my witness.

All
I have ever done where Nemaizer is concerned is defend my good name
and my unalienable rights against Nemaizer's aggression, intrusions,
extreme provocations and defamatory statements. The facts and the
evidence, all of which I have documented, vindicate me, while
Nemaizer's lack of such stands in stark contrast.

But
first, some background. I first came into contact with Howard
Nemaizer in 2012, through mutual acquaintances, when I was invited to
appear as a guest on his radio program, "Truth Talk News".
Subsequently, I was invited back for a number of shows. At that time,
I had no reason to believe that Nemaizer was a dishonest person and
malicious pathological liar; that revelation came later, after much
firsthand experience.

Nemaizer
also revealed himself to be a very aggressive and ambitious amateur,
a name-dropper and gate-crasher, looking to make a name for himself
by riding the coattails of legitimate whistleblowers, journalists,
survivors of government operations, some of whom, unlike Nemaizer
himself, have risked our lives, in the face of brutal persecution, to
stand against government corruption and to defend unalienable rights
and liberties.

Howard
Nemaizer is not a journalist, nor has any professional background or
training, no area of expertise which would qualify him to speak or
write authoritatively on the subject matter he addresses on his
websites or TV/ radio programs. Howard Nemaizer is a rank amateur, a
poseur, posturing as a "patriot", as a "truth teller",
as a knowlegable expositor, when nothing could be further from the
truth. Nemaizer is a salesman by trade, and as per the most recent
public information available on the Internet, he is a used car
salesman in Torrington, CT.

I
have seen numerous examples whereby Nemaizer plagiarizes the work of
others (both legitimate and not), without giving credit to the
source, and without separating his own added comments from the
material written by others. His "knowledge" (such as it is)
comes solely from reading the work of others, on the Internet, or
from books he reads, which he then copies to his websites or parrots
on his radio/TV shows.

There
is nothing wrong with using excerpts, even entire articles written by
others, as long as the source is given and properly credited, but
there is something very wrong with stealing the work of others and
claiming it AS IF it were his own, while tampering with it by adding
comments not written by the author. That is not only plagiarism, but
forgery.

Nemaizer
frequently contradicts himself, and switches from one position to
another, from promoting one political ideology, to changing it to
another. The same goes for political candidates, across a broad
spectrum.

I
have seen him on his TV show, announcing himself as the campaign
coordinator (or some such thing) for the state of Connecticut, for
this or that presidential candidate, spewing rhetoric which parrots
that of the contender, and then, a few weeks later, he drops the
campaign and picks up another.

Nemaizer
is like a weather vane; any way the wind blows, so go his opinions,
his alliances, his bandwagon-jumping. As the old saying goes, When
you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything. And Nemaizer does
fall, hard, time after time, seemingly unaware of his own gullibility
and lack of discernment.

I
should make it very clear that my ONLY concern as regards Nemaizer's
unscrupulous m.o. is that MY NAME and website have been promoted and
exploited in connection with a plethora of false information, wild
speculation, unwarranted assumptions, erroneous conclusions, and the
outright idiocy of much of what Nemaizer promotes on his websites and
TV/radio programs. That, and placing MY NAME in connection with
certain unscrupulous characters AS IF I were associated with them, or
worse, affiliated with them, when in fact, I am not.

Howard
Nemaizer has attempted to appropriate the fruits of my labor, my
decades of hard work, and has made many false claims as to the nature
of my former association with him, which never consisted of anything
more than occasional appearances as a guest on his radio/TV programs.

And
although, for a short period of time (2012-2013) I considered him a
"friend", that is, until he showed his true colors as
anything but, he has misrepresented the nature of that association,
and blown it way out of proportion, by his many deceptive public
comments, in which the reader (or audience of his shows) is led to
believe there was some professional "partnership", or that
I was part of some group effort, or team, which included him and
certain of his cohorts, such as the many “friends” he claims on
Facebook or other social media, most of whom I do not even know.

I
am not part of Howard Nemaizer's world of Internet culture, Facebook
“friends”, social media, group think, where anything goes and all
are welcome to participate in my endeavors.

The
truth is that I have always been strictly independent in my
professional work. I am not a team player, and I don't work with
amateurs. As for my professional colleagues, I choose them with great
care and discretion. I can guarantee that Howard Nemaizer was at no
time one of them.

This
upstart amateur, this aggressive, intrusive busybody, this
gate-crasher and name-dropper, this publicity hound and grandstander,
this wannabe, Howard Nemaizer, has stirred up a world of trouble, has
been responsible for immeasurable damages to my good name and
personal/professional reputation.

Now,
to add insult to injury, Howard Nemaizer has published yet another
pack of malicious lies, more false accusations, and outrageous
invasions of my privacy. He has violated confidential information by
publishing it on the Internet; he has published photos which were
taken without my knowledge or consent, in direct disregard of my
clearly stated prohibition of ever using any such material in a
public venue. He has overstepped the bounds of the most basic
decency.

I
will not allow these lies to stand, and, as always, I find it
necessary to refute them here with the truth and the facts.

Due
to Nemaizer's extreme violations of my privacy, and the accompanying
lies he has concoted, some of which are of a personal nature, I will
not allow Nemaizer to bait me into responding to provocations which
would only further invade my privacy.

The
fact of the matter is that Howard Nemaizer has commingled issues
which are totally unrelated, and has done for quite some time. He
addresses issues by way of his personal, subjective opinions, feelings
and viewpoints, instead of dealing with objective reality. He
dismisses hard facts as if they were unimportant; disregarding the
actual issue at hand (whatever it may be) in attempts to make himself
appear credible, truthful, or justified in his actions, when in fact
his extreme subjectivity reveals his unscrupulous self-serving,
ego-driven agenda.

The
issue is very simple, and has been since Nemaizer first began to
exploit my name with his fraudulent promotions. The issue is libel,
defamation, misrepresentation, false light, exploitation, theft of
the fruits of my labor, and invasion of privacy. All of which have
been directly responsible for extreme damages.

Anything
I have ever stated in regard to Howard Nemaizer in my reports and
notices has been solely for the purpose of setting the public record
straight; of standing in my own defense against his aggression and
provocations; of refuting Nemaizer's lies with facts and evidence.

I
do not have the resources to sue Howard Nemaizer, though his offenses
are certainly actionable under the law. As in the many other cases of
defamation, the massive, unrelenting libel/slander campaigns waged
against me by government operatives and their minions and stooges,
the best I can do is expose the liars and state the truth for the
public record.

“I have learned through
friends that Barbara Hartwell has been maliciously attacking and
spreading lies about me.”

This is a vague statement.
What “lies” are these? He does not specify. I have never, at any
time, “maliciously attacked” Howard Nemaizer. Nor have any lies
about him been published by me. If he wants to make this claim, let
him name the “lies”, otherwise it is meaningless.

I seriously doubt that
Nemaizer “learned” of these alleged “lies” from “friends”.
No, he saw what was written by me, did not like being exposed for his
offenses, which he refused even to acknowledge as such, so he called
my statements of fact lies. Typical tactic of a habitual liar: accuse
another person of what you yourself are guilty. Project your own
character flaws and misdeeds on others.

“She claims I have not deleted
her work, when I have, long ago. Aside from this post there is not
one article, link or video on TRUTH TALK NEWS or HowardNema.com that
I have not deleted.”

I have made no such claim.
The issue was not deleting MY work, with the exception of a series of
unpublished interviews, which Nemaizer published, without my
knowledge or consent, in which he also stole the name, “The Barbara
Hartwell Chronicles”, in violation of a “good faith” verbal
agreement.

The ONLY issue is my truthful
and factual claims, and the subject of my demands, specifically that
Nemaizer has been exploiting and misrepresenting the name and website
of Barbara Hartwell, including with fraudulent notices, such as
“TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH”. By his own admission, this notice
has been published on his websites “since February 2014”, in
“over 200 posts.”

The demands were that
Nemaizer REMOVE HIS FALSEHOODS about Barbara Hartwell. Which he had
previously publicly stated that he refused to do, unless he was PAID
to do so.

He claims: “...there is not
one article, link or video on TRUTH TALK NEWS or HowardNema.com that
I have not deleted.” And that he has done this “long ago”. This
is a bald faced lie.

As of October 29, when I
published a formal complaint against Nemaizer, he had not deleted
these fraudulent notices. They still appeared on a number of pages in
the “categories” on Howard Nema dot com. Had he removed the
offensive material “long ago”, as he claims, I would not have
found it necessary to publish an additional formal complaint against
him.

As well, Nemaizer's video
(July 2014), titled “MK Ultra and the CIA Book of Dirty Tricks”,
in which I had no involvement whatsoever, and in which Nemaizer
presented false information about my background with CIA, as well as
about CIA operations (of which Nemaizer himself is entirely ignorant)
and shamelessly exploited my name, was still there, on the same page,
along with his fraudulent notice.

How many people, since July
2014, have watched this video? How many have believed the false
information about Barbara Hartwell presented by Howard Nemaizer? How
much damage has he done to my reputation? The very thought is
responsible for extreme distress to me.

Nemaizer has proven by his
actions that he is an habitual and unrepentant liar. I can only
believe what I see with my own eyes, which, when I last checked, was
right there on Nemaizer's website, just as it had been since 2014.

“Yet she continuously attacks
me, tries to discredit me and even was so lame as to publish my real
name, as if it is a secret.”

Again, I have not “attacked”
Howard Nemaizer. If he is stupid enough to believe that standing in
my own defense against his exploitation and misrepresentation of my
name is an “attack”, then there appears to be no remedy for his
utter lack of intellectual wherewithal and his moral bankruptcy.

Howard Nemaizer has
discredited himself via his own dishonesty and foolishness. He needs
no help from me.

Howard Nemaizer is his actual
name, though he uses a pseudonym, Howard Nema. Why should I use a
pseudonym when addressing the offenses of a real person? I never made
any claim that his name was a secret.

“Oh, heavens to Betsy. I have
mentioned my REAL name, Howard Nemaizer on air many times and use
Howard Nema simply because it has been my stage name as a musician
and it is easy to remember. There is no great “deception” or
alias. I don’t know if I can say that about BH, but I don’t
attack others and normally ignore inaccurate rantings.”

What the hell is Nemaizer on
about now? I have no concern about his reasons for using a pseudonym,
nor have ever stated such a thing.
“Inaccurate rantings”?
That is Nemaizer's province, not mine.And in the midst of this
malicious attack against Barbara Hartwell, he states that “I don't
attack others”. Now, that is just plain absurd.

“BH ‘s obsession with trying
to discredit me should be very revealing to those who know me and my
work; and now the absence of any of the material BH claims I refuse
to remove should set the record straight. But BH keeps stalking me
and posting disinformation.”

These statements are utterly
preposterous. Taking necessary action to stop an aggressive
gate-crasher from exploiting my name and publishing false information
and fraudulent notices is my standard policy. There is no obsession
involved, just business as usual. He wasn't the first and I doubt
he'll be the last. It is the nature of the beast for his ilk to
attempt to invade the personal boundaries of legitimate people, in
attempts to latch on and appropriate what they are sorely lacking
through their own initiative.

Now, he accuses me of
“stalking” him? How moronic. Publishing notices demanding that a
liar remove false information could not possibly qualify as stalking.
A stalker is one who engages in pursuing a Target by unwanted
communications, phone calls, letters, e-mails, or following on foot,
in a vehicle, etc.

I have done no such things,
ever. I have had no communication with Howard Nemaizer since May,
2014 (on a necessary business matter), nor wanted any, nor attempted
any. In fact, I have publicly notified him that any further attempts
to contact me will be regarded as harassment. Nemaizer, in one such
attempt at unwanted communication, sent a letter by post to my PO
box. I instructed the postal clerk to stamp the letter REFUSED and
return to sender.

Is he delusional, or what?
More likely, just once again projecting his own unscrupulous behavior
on me.

He accuses me of “posting
disinformation”. It is clear he does not know the meaning of the
word, so I won't belabor the point. Again, what a moron.

“Like the fact I was asked to
do a local radio show on UNITED FM RADIO by owner Keith Mutch, who
saw my appearance on WAPJ and invited me to do a weekly 3 hr show.

It had been a year since I did
any live radio and I agreed. We did several shows before I quit due
to owner Keith Mutch’s shock jock style attacking residents, many I
know in town, which caused great conflict and guilt by association
with some of my friends here in Torrington, who informed me that
Keith was convicted of felony arson.”

According to Howard Nemaizer,
this so-called “disinformation” posted by me concerned his
association with one Keith Mutch. There was no such “disinformation”,
and what's more, I have no interest whatsoever in Nemaizer's personal
reasons for hosting a show on this network. That is not my concern.
As always, my ONLY concern is that Howard Nemaizer was USING MY NAME
on some of the same pages as his promotions of Keith Mutch.

Keith Mutch is a career
criminal and predicate felon. All it would take for anyone of even
minimal intelligence to find his extensive criminal record and other
notorious public offenses is to put his name in a search engine.
There are mainstream news articles, videos, police reports, etc. But
Nemaizer had to “learn” of this from friends? Who does he think
will believe something so stupid?

Keith Mutch also promotes
demonic images on his website, such as a flaming skeleton, such as
attendees of a heavy metal concert saluting Satan with the
two-fingered devil horns, and the lyrics of the heavy metal “songs”
come straight from the pit of hell. If Nemaizer wants to broadcast
his program on such a loathsome station, and affiliate himself with its
criminal owner, that is his business.

But when he has the
unmitigated audacity to display MY NAME on the same pages, which he
has impudently done, then it is my right to protest vehemently and
demand that MY NAME be removed. So much for Nemaizer's claim of
“disinformation”.

“I don’t need people like
Keith Mutch in my life any more than I need Barbara Hartwell in my
life. In any case, BH benefited far more from our association than I
did, despite her lies, cries of outrage and crocodile tears.

I couldn't give a tinker's
damn what Howard Nemaizer “needs”. His total and pathological
lack of discretion and discernment is his problem, but I won't allow
him to make it mine.

And how dare he use my name
in the same sentence, comparing me to one of his demonic criminal
cohorts. I cut off any association with Nemaizer at the end of 2013,
for good, by my own choice, so what's his point? Maybe he should
consider the very salient fact that had he not continued to pursue an
association with me, unwanted on my part, and had he had the common
decency to stop exploiting my name, none of my public protests of his
wrongdoing would have been necessary.

Howard Nemaizer has brought
all this on himself. He chose his own misguided actions. He is one of
those people whose compulsive, pathological aggression will not allow
him to take NO for answer. He will keep pushing and pushing, refusing
to acknowledge his own errors and offenses, until he finally provokes
rightful outrage from the subject of his aggression. Then, he will
feign innocence of any wrongdoing. That is passive-aggressive
behavior and typical of busybodies, who just can't seem to mind their
own business, but refuse to be held accountable for their offensive
actions.

He continued to obstinately
disregard my rightful protests of his wrongful actions, his
aggression and provocations. He has always been the aggressor, not I.
Righteous outrage on my part is a given, and this surprises him?

For him to claim that I have
“benefited” in any way from an association with him is a
bald-faced lie, as well as utterly ludicrous and delusional. He
doesn't speak for me, and the fact of the matter is that the brief
association I had with Howard Nemaizer has brought nothing but
trouble, losses, damages and grief into my life. And it is ongoing to
this day, as shown by his latest offensive against me.

This, from an aggressive
gate-crasher who attempted to horn in on MY professional business,
who has shamelessly exploited MY name for his own self-serving ends;
who has promoted fraudulent notices in deceptive efforts to make it
appear that I am a “partner” of several persons (including
himself) when it holds not a grain of truth.

He calls me a liar, when all
the documented evidence I have furnished (in numerous reports and
notices, links given below) clearly shows that he is the sole liar,
and that he is projecting his pathological behavior on me.

Outraged? Who wouldn't be?
That is the one true statement he has made. Nothing outrages me more
than a liar, especially one who bears false witness, and makes false
accusations, for his own unscrupulous ends.

“You
see, I QUIT long before BH posted that I was a radio host on UNITED
FM.Get your facts straight, Barbara
if you are going to accuse people, unless facts and truth no longer
matter to you.”

No, I don't see. What in the
bloody hell is he talking about? This, in connection to his very
public association with a career criminal, whom he was promoting all
over the Internet, which I mentioned solely in the context of his use
of MY NAME on the same damnable pages.

In point of fact, I first
posted comments about Keith Mutch in one of my updates at a time when
Nemaizer's show was airing there and being promoted on both
Nemaizer's sites and on UNITED FM Radio. September 13, 2015, to be
precise. He was still broadcasting there by the Labor Day weekend.
Another lie.

And why would I care, or even
know, how long Nemaizer's show was running on that station? His
promotions lasted for months. Does he think I
would prioritize tracking a timeline of his activities, so that I can
“get the facts straight”?

I have all the facts I need.
The FACT is that Howard Nemaizer was using my name in connection with
Keith Mutch, ON THE SAME PAGES. And that is the ONLY FACT that
matters to me, or is relevant to Nemaizer's flagrant
misrepresentation of my name.

"I remember when I thought they did. Your actions
make me question everything you have ever confided in me with and everything we
discussed on radio shows.

You revealed your true self by attacking me. And I
am sorry we ever met, Barbara.

Honestly, much as I thought I knew Barbara
Hartwell, I clearly did not know her at all . But I know her now and I
know her game:

By their fruits shall we know them.

This is the only and final response to
BH."

"Honestly” is not a word
which has anything to do with Howard Nemaizer, but typical that he
would use it in attempts to cover his deception.
“

The only and final
response”. Another of Howard Nemaizer's many lies and contradictory
statements. What about the other defamatory notice on his website, of
February 24, 2015, in which he states:

“No
posts in the future will mention or include Barbara Hartwell’s
name.”

Really? Then what in the
bloody hell is this new piece of scurrilous trash he has posted?

Now, here's some idiocy. Of
course he never knew me. If he had done, he would never have been
foolish enough to mess with me, nor would he assume that I would
tolerate such unconscionable behavior. I don't tolerate such behavior
from anyone, so why would he be an exception?

He didn't know me then,
and he sure as hell doesn't know me now. He will never know me, which
suits me just fine, as long as he gets the hell off my case and
leaves me alone. That is my one and only wish as regards Howard
Nemaizer.

“By
their fruits shall we know them.”

Here, Nemaizer parrots a
(mis)quote from scripture, which he knows I have frequently used (the
correct quote) in my reports, including in reference to him
personally, in an attempt to once again twist things around to blame
me for his own wrongdoing.

There is no game here, only
the brutal truth, which Nemaizer is too blind, by far, to see. And
for Nemaizer's edification, you can't get good fruit from a poisonous
tree, and the poisonous issue of lies, aggression, and a self-serving
agenda is all I have ever seen as regards the fruits he bears.

And now, Nemaizer shows not
only his lack of common decency, but his true malice.

“There has been much omitted
from her attacks like the money I gave her and took her in when she
faced homelessness. Barbara Hartwell lived at my home rent free in
“squalor” for six weeks eating fried shrimp and filet minion
provided by yours truly.”

Howard Nemaizer repeats his
false claim of “attacks”, which in actuality were my righteous
protests of his wrongdoing.

The issues he raises here
have absolutely nothing to do with my protests against his
exploitation, misrepresentation, and fraudulent notices in connection
with my name.

As far as his claim of what I
have “omitted”, he apparently holds the false notion that I am
somehow obligated to include in my reports what HE believes to be
relevant. He clearly also believes that, assuming he donated money to
me, that “buys” him the right to do and say anything he pleases;
to exploit my name for his own ends; to invade my privacy; to treat
me with a total lack of respect for my personal boundaries and
fundamental rights. Dead wrong, Nemaizer.

Now, for the FACTS: I did NOT
stay at Howard Nemaizer's house for “six weeks”. That is a lie. I
arrived at his house on November 22, 2013. And I left on December 21,
2013, when an edict was issued from On High, from Maureen Nemaizer,
the wife of Howard Nemaizer, that I (a disabled senior citizen,
utterly destitute and under persecution) be thrown into the street.

Let us count the days, from
November 22 to December 21: a total of twenty nine (29) days. Six
weeks, as claimed by Nemaizer, according to his brilliant numerical
calculations, would have been forty two (42) days. That would have
included Christmas 2013 and the New Year, into 2014. So, Nemaizer is
claiming that I was there during those holidays, when in fact I most
certainly was not. And the lies just keep on coming...

Nemaizer then makes the
ludicrous claim that I was “eating filet minion” (which he has
misspelled – it is filet mignon, for his edification). In point of
fact, and for the record, I have been a vegetarian for most of my
adult life, for over forty (40) years. I do not eat the dead bodies
of tortured and brutally slaughtered animals. No, that is Nemaizer's
diet, not mine. To tell such a brazen lie only shows that he is so
desperate to misrepresent me in a false light, and all that I stand
for, that he will say anything he can think of to achieve his
unscrupulous ends. And, for the record, Nemaizer has known full well
that I am a vegetarian, and for ethical reasons, which naturally
would count for nothing to him. He lies, because it serves his ends.

“Why won’t her OWN family
help her?

Due to Nemaizer's monstrous
invasions of my privacy, and that of my family, I refuse to allow his
further intrusions into my personal life by including his additional
comments about them. It is none of his damnable business, nor the
business of the general public.

He has the unmitigated gall
to drag my family into his unconscionable attempts to discredit me.
Howard Nemaizer does not know anyone in my family. For the record,
none of my family, not one member, anywhere, has anything to do with
the issue at hand. None of them are involved in my professional work,
nor ever have been. None of them have been responsible in any way for
the persecution directed against me, nor the dreadful circumstances I
faced at the time, to which Nemaizer refers. In fact, my family has
suffered the same invasions of their privacy, the same unjust
demonization, for years, because of malicious people like Howard
Nemaizer, simply by virtue of the fact that they are related to me.
It is beyond despicable.

How much lower can Howard
Nemaizer stoop, in his malicious assaults on my character? Read on...

“And why did she turn on me,
after claiming to be so desperate and on the verge homelessness then
complain how I displaced her when she was going to be thrown out on
the street?”

I have no idea what Nemaizer
is talking about. I have never made any statement, such that he
“displaced” me. For the record, I have documented, in great
detail, the entire ordeal I endured at the hands of Howard Nemaizer,
his wife, Maureen Nemaizer and their trashy sleazebag friends. I won't repeat it here, except to
refute Nemaizer's specific lies. (Links for the reports may be found
at the bottom of the page.)

“I think she thought she had
found another sucker to pay her bills. Her vindictive attacks are as
relentless as her pursuit of 'donations'”.

What in the bloody hell is
this supposed to mean? “Another sucker”? Nemaizer, the habitual
liar and character assassin, now makes yet another outrageously false
statement.

At no time did I ever ask
Nemaizer to pay my bills, nor did he ever do any such thing. And I
have never in my life sought out any “suckers” for this purpose,
nor engaged in any such unscrupulous activity . I have paid my own
bills, to the best of my ability, and the sources of my material
support are, once again, none of Nemaizer's damnable business.

As for the donations he makes
reference to, that is also none of Nemaizer's concern. I have the
right to solicit donations to support my work, just as many other
journalists and whistleblowers do. And as I have clearly stated in
notices on my website, all donations, given in the spirit of
Christian charity, or love gifts, no questions asked, no strings attached, are gratefully accepted, with the
understanding that they are to be used at the sole discretion of
Barbara Hartwell.

Nemaizer, aggressive busybody
that he is, seems to be deluded in his belief that any “donations”
by him would entitle him to meddle in my business, or to appoint
himself as the Town Crier, publicly commenting on my financial
affairs.

“My wife didn’t like the
idea at all, but she went along with it and we took Barbara in.”

Before I continue, I find it
necessary to make the core of this issue perfectly clear. Howard
Nemaizer made an offer of sanctuary to me in October of 2013, when I
explained to him that I would soon be forced to leave my home in
Maine, because I could no longer afford to pay the rent and other
bills. I had nowhere to go, and though I made every effort to find
even a temporary place to stay, I was unable to do so.I never asked for Nemaizer's
help. I only accepted his offer, when it became clear that I had no
other options, short of being homeless in the street.

When he made his offer of
sanctuary, it came with a number of assurances and promises, all of
which, I learned only after it was too late, were lies,
misrepresentations of the actual circumstances.

Nemaizer's offer was
made under false pretenses. It was a “bait and switch”, which
considering the dire nature of my situation, greatly exacerbated my
plight, rather than helping.

Since I have already
documented all of this in detail (see links to reports), I will stick
to refuting the false statements given here by Nemaizer.

For one thing, Nemaizer
failed to inform me of the truth: that his wife, as he states here,
“did not like the idea at all.” I had no way of knowing this
until after I arrived there. In fact, he stated that his wife would
welcome me into their home. He lied. Had I known the truth, I would
never have accepted the offer, no matter how desperate my
circumstances. As previously stated, Howard Nemaizer does not know me
at all, or he would have known that I would never set foot in a place
where I was unwelcome. That is a matter of honor, one I'm sure
Nemaizer is incapable of understanding.

But then, Nemaizer
misrepresented the entire situation, and I did not learn of this
until I was placed in the untenable position of being stranded there,
with no resources, and nowhere else to go.

“In those 6 weeks she didn’t
lift a finger to help around the house and even disobeyed wishes to
make her presence living in Our home a secret from my in-laws and
neighbors, who ultimately informed my landlord, by which time my wife
was already quite sick of Barbara and her non-conformity of house
rules.”

At no time did Howard
Nemaizer ever inform me that my presence in his house was to be kept
a “secret” from anyone. No, this was one of many bombshells
dropped after the fact. Furthermore, I never agreed to any such
thing. His wife, Maureen Nemaizer, wanted me to lie about why I was
there, when her parents came for Thanksgiving dinner. In fact, before
I ever learned of any of this, she had actually fabricated a “story”
to explain my presence there, fed it to her parents, and expected me
to participate in the deception. She, like her husband, is a manipulative busybody and an habitual
liar.

Nemaizer's statement is
again, a misrepresentation of the entire situation. He never informed
me that I would be expected to participate in such a deception, nor
that my presence was to be kept a “secret”.

His arrogance, added to his
dishonesty, should be clear: “disobeyed wishes”? This may come as
a surprise to the likes of Nemaizer and the Gulag Commander, Maureen
Nemaizer, but I am not obligated to “obey” anyone, just because
they have decided to engage in a deception in which I never agreed to
participate.

As regards the landlord:
Another issue about which I was never informed until it was too late.
This bombshell was dropped when Maureen Nemaizer told me that it was
a violation of their lease to have a guest staying there. When I
asked why I was not informed of this prior to my coming there, no
answer was given, only some vague whining about the “rules” of
their lease. But naturally, as a result of yet another deception of
Howard Nemaizer, I was expected to toe the line.

What was originally presented
as an offer of sanctuary to a “friend” in need, turned out to be
an extremely stressful ordeal, where I was treated with great
disrespect, insulted, blamed for circumstances beyond my control, and
expected to “obey” the whims of this pair of pushy, meddlesome
busybodies, Howard and Maureen Nemaizer.

“Did I mention that I moved
her stuff from Maine to Connecticut for free, in a van I rented and
paid for. The expenses of the move came close to $400.”

No, I don't believe he
mentioned this, but I certainly did, in one of my previous reports
detailing Howard Nema's many deceptions. He lied about this too. He
assured me that he would help me move all the possessions I needed to
take with me, which I had clearly explained beforehand. But he
reneged on his promise (as with many others) at the last minute,
which resulted in irreplaceable losses of things which were of great
value to me.

“Did I mention that Dave
chauffeured Barbara in her own car from Maine to CT, also for free?”

As usual, Nemaizer
misrepresents this situation entirely. Here are the facts: I had told
him that I am not able to drive on highways, or in heavy traffic due
to disability, a condition which has limited me for over fifteen (15)
years.

He told me that he would find
someone to drive my car from Maine to Connecticut. Who did he enlist
for this task David St. John aka “Dave”, who just happened to be a drunk driving
convict (DUI). A person who was prohibited under the law from driving
any vehicle, unless under specified conditions. Some “chauffeur”.

Was I told of this? No, not
until after the fact. Thus, Nemaizer placed me at great risk, as I
would have been implicated in a crime, should we have been stopped by
the police during a five hour drive, across state lines from Maine to
Connecticut.

I would never have consented
to such a thing, had I been told the truth. Nemaizer, typically,
arranged this without my knowledge or consent. Just as Howard
Nemaizer has done repeatedly, in many other cases. The knowledge or
consent of others is clearly unimportant to him. He does what he
pleases, at his own misguided whims, placing others (in this case,
me) in a position to be harmed by his actions. It seems Nemaizer's
philosophy is: The ends justify the means.

“Did I mention that I even
paid for a nice meal before we all headed down on the day of the
move?”

What relevance to the real
issues could this possibly have? What is Nemaizer trying to prove?
Boasting of one of his “many acts of kindness”, for which he has
claimed I am a “terribly ungrateful soul”.

“Did I mention that after a
month’s notice before we took her in that hardly anything was
packed when my friend Dave and I arrived and that we had to do
basically all the packing?”

Another misrepresentation
aimed at blaming me for circustances beyond my control. It is untrue
that “hardly anything” was packed. Many boxes had been packed by
me.

And I had clearly stated to
Nemaizer well ahead of time that I was UNABLE to pack many of my
possessions because I could not get access to them. It would have
involved heavy lifting, of which I am not capable, due to disability.
Nemaizer had assured me beforehand that he would help me with this on
the day of the move, but reneged at the last minute, so I was forced
to leave these things behind.

Then, there was the fact that
I had no money to purchase the necessary boxes and packing materials,
not enough gas in the car to go back and forth to a market to get
free boxes. I had no help from anyone, and I did the best I could, as
Nemaizer was well aware. Again, he misrepresents the situation to make
it appear that I am at fault for something beyond my control.

“All BH could muster in her
tirades about Dave, was to ridicule him and call him a drunk.”

Another misrepresentation of
my words. I called him a “drunk driving convict”. That is a fact.
And I did so in the context of the aforementioned deception by Howard
Nemaizer.

“Speaking of drunks.

BH couldn’t wait for me to
return to get her wine that very first day. She borrowed $10 from my
wife and had my 13 year old son drive with her in her own car to show
to show her where the package store was. Talk about a drunk.”

Now, he tries to twist things
around and call me a “drunk”? Simply because I bought a bottle of
wine. I have been drinking wine with dinner for my entire adult life,
as is my family tradition. So what? I have never been arrested for
any sort of DUI, never had any sort of “drinking problem”, nor
have ever been a “drunk”. And any money I may have borrowed from
his wife was paid back in full. And why drag his son into this? Is he
actually trying to suggest that I was “corrupting a minor”?

The absurdity of this
statement reveals his desperation to smear my character. Considering
the fact that Howard Nemaizer was rarely without an open can of beer
in his hand, the entire time I was there, this is just another
example of his projection of his own habits on me.

“Here are the squalid
conditions of the room Barbara stayed and was forced to endure,
complete with fireplace.”

Next item: Nemaizer posts a
photo of the cold, dark, dirty basement of his house where I was
staying during the 29 days of sheer misery.

But, as usual, the photo is
purposely deceptive and misrepresents the actual nature of the area.
Only a small portion of one (ugly) cinderblock wall is shown, with a
table standing in front of it. Why didn't he show the whole thing?
The filthy concrete floors and walls, for a start. The place was not
fit for human (or animal) habitation, due to mildew, dangerous black
mold, cold and damp. I've no doubt it would violate the building
code, should an inspector come to check.

It seems likely that is why
the landlord prohibited any guest from staying there: he could be
cited for violating the code.

“There was NO gratitude, only
empty words of gratitude. . .and lies.Clearly, Barbara also has
selective memory.”

In point of fact, I have an
excellent memory. I also have a photographic memory. There is nothing
“selective” about it. The conditions in Nemaizer's basement were
precisely as I have described them in my previous report (for which
a link is given below.)

And he expects me to be
grateful for his many lies, for placing me at grave risk, in any
number of ways, for his arrogant expectation that I would “obey”
his whims to participate in his deceptions as the “price” of
these horrible accomodations?

There have been no lies, not
on my part. I described the conditions as they were, nothing more.

“The first opportunity BH had
to “blow her cover” with my in-laws happened that Thanksgiving
eve, when she claimed being so exhausted, she couldn’t wait for my
in-laws to leave and reported she was going to go to bed, causing
immediate and constant conflict. BH knew that day that we told her
NOT TO LET ON she was living with us to Our in-laws.”

Again, this moron, Nemaizer,
actually believes that I was obligated to suffer his whims and “obey”
them. I never agreed to any such thing. What's more, I was not on any
kind of “undercover” operation, I was simply a guest in his
house, though I certainly was not treated as such. Any “conflict”
that was caused is on Nemaizer himself. He was the one who
misrepresented the situation to me. He was the one who arrogantly
expected me to participate in his and his wife's deceptions.

“Believe me, the 6 weeks were
full of conflict between me and my wife. I had Barbara’s back. In
retrospect, I realized how I was duped.”

Again, Nemaizer's lie about
the “6 weeks” surfaces and his blame of me for the conflict with
his wife. In truth, the conflict was caused solely by Nemaizer's
deceptions and the fact that he was living in thrall to the fear of the disapproval of his inlaws.

At no time did I lie to him,
nor “dupe” him. He was solely responsible for the situation he
created through his own lack of honesty and integrity.

“After BH was forced to leave
by my landlord, I stored her belongings for more than 6 months for
free.”

I was not “forced to leave
by his landlord”. That is another bald faced lie. No, I was forced
to leave when his wife, Maureen Nemaizer, issued an edict that I must
be OUT BY NOON on December 21 (day 29, NOT day 42, as claimed by Howard
Nemaizer).

This neurotic, whining harridan was
constantly harassing me, following me around, insulting me,
criticizing me, and even impugning my sanity. I had told her, from
the first time the edict was issued, that I would be leaving on the
designated day, no matter what. Unlike Nemaizer and his wife, I mean
what I say and say what I mean. And no matter the circumstances, it
is a point of honor never to remain in a place where I am told I am
not wanted.

Howard Nemaizer had told me
that it would be “no problem” for him to store my possessions
for as long as was necessary. Considering the fact that I had nowhere
to take them when I left, there was no other option.

And in fact, my things were
stored there not for six (6) months, but for five (5) months, from
December 21 to May 22, when I finally was able to scrape up the money
to hire movers to pick up my things.

“She then had the audacity to
accuse me of stealing her stuff when movers finally came to get her
things. Apparently BH got a cheap deal by crying poverty and
disability. The movers asked if she was disabled and I told them yes.
They didn’t seem convinced. I assured them by mentioning she was a
whistle-blower.”

This is pure unadulterated
bullshit from Howard Nemaizer. Here are the facts. I hired the movers
myself and my contract with them had nothing to do with Nemaizer. The
only involvement he had was to be home to let them in to retrieve my
possessions. Period.

In their ad it was stated
that they gave discounts for senior citizens and the disabled. I had
arranged up front to receive the discount. There was never any
question about it in their minds. There was no “cheap deal by
crying poverty and disability”.

The movers did not ask the idiot Howard
Nemaizer if I was disabled, that is just another outrageous lie.

The truth is, Howard Nemaizer, the
busybody and gossip, the Town Crier, couldn't restrain himself from discussing my
private business with the moving men, with his tales of
cloak-and-dagger intrigue, trying to make himself seem “important”
by association. This, after I had clearly stated that I did not want
my business discussed with ANYONE after I left.

Fat chance of Nemaizer ever
having an ounce of respect for the wishes of others, or for their
privacy and personal boundaries.

Howard Nemaizer has been
doing the same thing ever since, with his name-dropping, fraudulent
notices and idiotic presentations, all exploiting the name of Barbara
Hartwell. He thinks he will make a name for himself by lying about
what was a very brief and unremarkable association with me. Just a
typical hanger-on, a wannabe who thinks he can gain his objective by
exploiting the name and work of a legitimate individual.

And lastly, the moving men
had no need to know that I am a “whistleblower”, nor anything
else about my background. It was a simple business contract, nothing
more. I was again outraged when I learned from the moving men that
Nemaizer had been shooting off his mouth, in direct disregard for my
clearly stated wishes.

“Apparently, BH didn’t like
me invading her privacy to appease the movers who felt they were
being played. I should’ve said, no. She’s not disabled. Rake her
over the coals. But by maintaining her disability story, I was
invading her privacy.”

Nemaizer is really off the
charts with this absolute nonsense. Of course he invaded my privacy,
as he had done many times before. There was no need to “appease the
movers”, and they never felt they were being “played”. Nemaizer
was not involved in the transaction. It had nothing to do with him,
nor did he have any business discussing me with them. This is his
pathetic fabrication to try to justify his gossip and meddling. What
a stupendous parading idiot!

“She
then had the audacity to accuse me of stealing her stuff when movers
finally came to get her things.”

In a previous report, in
which I detailed the many lies and offenses of Howard Nemaizer, I
stated this FACT: That a number of my possessions, which had been
left in plain sight on the day I left, were missing when the movers
made their delivery.

I know exactly what I had and
where I left it. These items were necessary for me to take, since I
could not afford to replace them. Some of the items, of more
sentimental value, can never be replaced.Nemaizer stole them, and that
is the truth of it.

Just like he stole some of my mail, which was
forwarded to his house after I had left. Nemaizer told me on the
phone,shortly after I had left, that a package had been delivered for
me, and I asked him to send it to me at another address. But he never
did. I don't know who it was from, or what it contained, and now I never will. Nemaizer
opened it himself, and kept it.

None of this surprises me,
considering that Howard Nemaizer has been lying for quite some time,
about many things, so after stealing the fruits of my labor, why not
steal my possessions as well.

“Then she disappears from the
radar for about a year and then suddenly comes out of the woodwork,
not with a phone call, or letter describing any of her so called
“concerns” about me, even though she knows my number and my
address.”

Here are the FACTS. I did not
contact Howard Nemaizer again after the day my possessions (what was
left of them) were delivered by the movers, specifically on May 22,
2014.

After the utterly
disrespectful, insulting and callous way I had been treated, and
after the last straw, the theft of my possessions, I had no intention
of ever having further contact with Howard Nemaizer.

I would not have bothered
even to expose his misdeeds, except for one thing. I had discovered
that he had been publicly exploiting my name, specifically since
February 2014, including his fraudulent “TRUSTED PARTNERS IN TRUTH”
notice, his videos, and his comments about me which were plastered
all over his websites.

I was outraged. Nemaizer had
never admitted any wrongdoing in his treatment of me. I never
received any apology. I wanted nothing further to do with him, for
good reason. Evidently, Nemaizer foolishly believed that I was still
a “friend”.

At the first opportunity I
had, which was in December 2014, I published a report citing only a
small portion of Nemaizer's public offenses, as outlined here. At
that time, I politely requested, “with all due respect”, that he
remove the false information and fraudulent notices from his
websites. I waited for two months, but he chose to disregard my
request, and never removed the material I specified.

Then, I received a letter
from Nemaizer by post, in February 2015. My PO box is given on my website.
He did not have any other contact information for me, because I did
not want him to have a phone number or e-mail address, for what
should be obvious reasons.

Here is the evidence that
Howard Nemaizer knew of my public request to remove the false
information and fraudulent material. He stated:

"Please
accept my apologies for anything I have done that has upset you
regarding my work since we last spoke. I read and continue to read
your reports.”

He
sends his “apologies” in a private letter. But did he honor my
public request to REMOVE the material? No.

Therefore,
his apologies were insincere. This was never a private matter, since
Howard Nemaizer's misrepresentations were made publicly.

Apparently,
he thought he could acquit himself by such a ploy, but this was
unacceptable. The only decent thing he could have done was to remove
the material, as per my request, and issue a public apology and
retraction.

Shortly
thereafter, after waiting two months, I issued a public demand that
he remove the false information and fraudulent notices.

At
that point, he chose to attack me publicly, make false accusations
against me, and state that he refused to remove the lies, unless he
was PAID to do so.

Now,
he makes this statement, in reference to the fact that I did not
contact him privately, after he put out his false information
PUBLICLY.

“No. She goes out on the
attack from behind the isolation of her blog instead.What does that tell you? BH is
happy to invade everyone else’s privacy without any concern , but
you best not invade BH’s privacy or there will be relentless hell
to pay.”

What hypocrisy is this? I
made a PUBLIC request, and later, demands, addressing Howard
Nemaizer's PUBLIC offenses. There was never any “attack”, and I
have never once invaded his privacy. I have only stated the truth and the
facts, in my own defense, against his false accusations.

“Barbara Hartwell is a coward.
She is such a coward that she can only attack people from behind the
veil of her blog. She doesn’t even permit comments on her blog.”

What the hell is he
blathering on about? What I post on my website is my own business,
and none of Howard Nemaizer's. If he chooses to believe I am
“attacking” people the fool is entitled to his opinion.

Unlike those of Nemaizer's
ilk, I have never participated in the Internet culture of
free-for-all, where anything goes, anybody is welcome to stick their
nose into my professional business. I am a journalist who publishes
reports, and my website is not a forum for the use of all and sundry.

I am not interested in interacting with the public, nor have any
interest in their opinions about my work. If Howard Nemaizer had
taken the trouble to read my notices he would have seen that “This
website is for information purposes only. The readers may make of it
what they will.”

And for this, he calls me a
coward? No, the coward is Howard Nemaizer. He is a coward because he lies to cover his own wrongdoing,
rather than admit to it and make amends.

“Her goal was never to talk to
me, but attack me and stir a response. She even refused a letter I
wrote her, as if I was this horrible fiend who took such advantage of
her, invading her privacy, yada, yada, yada. I held back until now,
but I have finally be goaded on enough to speak my peace and put an
end to this.”

It was a personal decision
for me not to speak to him, with good reason, not a “goal”. He
vastly overestimates his own importance, as far as I am concerned. I
had no intention of engaging him in arguments or debates about an
issue which has always been non-negotiable. I don't negotiate or
argue with liars or gate-crashers.

Just as he accused me of
“stalking” him, he now accuses me of “goading” him. Nothing
could be further from the truth. His arrogant refusal to remove his
false information and fraudulent notices in connection with my name
was an extreme provocation, an act of aggression.

“And now, after more than a
year in obscurity, Barbara Hartwell finds herself living in the tony
town of Rhinebeck, NY still attacking me?

How’d that all come about?
Where was she?”

I have no idea where Howard
Nemaizer gets the idea that I have been “for more than a year in
obscurity”. He's free to believe what he will, it makes no
difference to me.

And what is the point of
this? He continues his theme of “attack”.

It is none of Howard
Nemaizer's business where I live, how it came about, where I have
been, or about any of my private affairs. This creep is one of the
worst, most invasive busybodies I have ever encountered in all my
years on this earth.

"Who’s paying the bills now?
She claims to be disabled and unable to work a job, but her writing
ability seems unaffected..."

How dare you, you lowlife
sonofabitch! It is none of your damnable business how, or where I
live, or how I pay my bills.

“I am certain BH will take
every word I write and in true COINTELPRO fashion, twist my words and
the truth in an attempt to justify her lies and con-artist-like
deceptions, and try to further discredit me as she was so skillfully
trained to do by the CIA.”

Why in hell would I bother to
do such a thing? When dealing with a malicious pathological liar like
Howard Nemaizer, it is very easy to let him hang himself with his own
words. As far as I am concerned, he has done that very well.

For the record, Howard
Nemaizer does not know what the hell he is talking about, regarding
COINTELPRO, or any other issues related to the intelligence
community. He merely parrots what he has heard and read from others.

“This overall experience has
certainly made me see the light about the true character of Barbara
Hartwell, the ever persecuted whistleblower and MK ULTRA victim.”

“To me, what is important is
that I now know all I have to know about BH. I wish her no ill will.
I just kindly ask her to stop her attacks.”

No ill will? No, just a
plethors of false accusations, character assassination, monstrous
invasions into my private affairs and malicious lies. All because I
refused to tolerate his public falsehoods which have been extremely
injurious to my good name, and issued demands that he remove his
offensive material from the Internet.

Great job, Nemaizer! You have
exposed your dishonesty, your aggression, your total lack of decency,
honor and integrity, and your utter disrespect for the privacy,
personal boundaries and fundamental human rights of others, better
than I ever could.

“If you truly are a sovereign
child of God, Barbara and not a CIA disinformation agent, do what
Jesus would do. Turn the other cheek as I am going to do–and get on
with your life.”

Unbelievable. Can he possibly
be serious? He now invokes the name of Jesus Christ, in his phony
attempts to appear holier-than-thou. Get behind me, Satan! And take
your lies from the pit of hell with you.

“Leave me out of it. But I
know you won’t. You can’t. There is a gnawing pathology in your
bearing of false witness, cutting and pasting pieces to support your
agenda while omitting pieces that dispel it. You and I both know the
truth.”

Once again, Howard Nemaizer is projecting his own psychopathology on me. He
is the one –the only one-- bearing false witness. In fact, my
demands for him to leave ME out of his idiotic promotions, and his
refusal to do so, is the whole core of this issue.

As for my agenda as regards
Nemaizer, it has never been anything more than to get this aggressive
gate-crashing sonofabitch OFF MY CASE.

Howard Nemaizer lies yet
again. I have never sought conflict, I have only stood in my own
defense against this upstart wannabe, whose invasions into my life
have been outrageously aggressive and offensive.

And although I can hold out
the hope that I will never hear anything from him again, I wouldn't
bet on it, considering the fact that he has proven himself to be an habitual and
unrepentant liar.

“You know exactly what you are
doing, Barbara. And so do I.”

Howard Nemaizer is utterly
clueless about anything I am doing, and that suits me fine.

“I will pray for you. Sadly, I
was a fool. But no longer.”

Please, Nemaizer, considering
who it is that you “pray” to (and it isn't God Almighty, Creator
of Heaven and Earth), I want none of your prayers.

“I cannot stop BH from
blathering on and on, but I will not stoop to her level in an attempt
to discredit or defame her anymore than she has already done so
herself.”

What a load of happy
horseshit. Can he possibly get any more ridiculous?

“I will say that if anyone
would like to investigate BH’s claims and derogatory puke about me
, they will find no trace of BH anywhere on TRUTH TALK NEWS or
HowardNema.com as she so feverishly insists.”

Howard Nemaizer aka Howard Nema”

Now he claims that everything
has been removed from his websites. Even if that were true (no way
to tell with such a liar), now that he has published this new article
filled with libelous falsehoods, character assassination and
monstrous invasions of privacy, what does he think will happen now?
Is he stupid enough to think that I will allow this latest outrage to stand, that I
will not continue to seek justice?

Howard Nemaizer has outdone
himself, with his melodramatic pronouncements and his pathological
projections of his own dishonesty, low moral character and idiocy
on me.

I think it would behoove him
to get out of the “conspiracy” business and limit himself to
selling used cars. I can't see that he is qualified for much else.Howard Nemaizer: By his corrupt fruits shall you know him.