Perhaps it’s time to change MSNBC to MSRBC, with the “R” standing for race. The far-left network has reached a point where every issue is about race no matter what host is ranting. The latest example of this comes from perennial race-baiting anchor Touré who on Nov. 26 attacked Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham as “old, white, establishment folks.”

Toure, the Boston bred, prep school educated Milton Academy graduate, who appears to have ditched his last name to gain street cred, is co-host of the cable channel's "The Cycle."

In Touré’s black-and-white world, McCain is a “bitter” failed candidate who has no right to dare question potential Secretary of State candidate Susan Rice because she is a “much younger black woman.” He also claimed McCain was on a "witchhunt" and "tarring" Rice, another unsubtle code word.

Just like Hannity's audience who, thanks to him last night, all believe that J.P. Morgan was a great man that brought us all electricity by taking the risk for everyone and investing in Edison. The audience won't realize Edison and Morgan failed and that Morgan bullied his way to acquiring Tesla's version of electricity which is the one we are using right now, not Edison's. He was using this argument to say how Morgan was a good capitalist but Warren Buffet was a bad one. It's a shame Hannity was wrong though.

Just like Hannity's audience who, thanks to him last night, all believe that J.P. Morgan was a great man that brought us all electricity by taking the risk for everyone and investing in Edison. The audience won't realize Edison and Morgan failed and that Morgan bullied his way to acquiring Tesla's version of electricity which is the one we are using right now, not Edison's. He was using this argument to say how Morgan was a good capitalist but Warren Buffet was a bad one. It's a shame Hannity was wrong though.

Sorry dude....the charge of racism is totally different that what you are describing here.

What I got of viewing this is that the attack by McCain was based is purported upon a notion that McCain loses his Chairmanship in the new session and was looking for a special committee to chair about the Libyan incident so he could remain relevant. Yes the statement quoted here was made but real late in the argument giving lip service to the notion that McCain was making the attack along racial lines, maybe. The whole of the argument was that it was to maintain relevancy in the next session.

__________________Even a superstitious man has certain inalienable rights. He has a right to harbor and indulge his imbecilities as long as he pleases. . . He has a right to argue for them as eloquently as he can, in season and out of season. He has a right to teach them to his children. But certainly he has no right to be protected against the free criticism of those who do not hold them. He has no right to demand that they be treated as sacred. He has no right to preach them without challenge." -H.L. Mencken