nmm 22 4500ICPSR04020MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04020MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4020NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the
use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult
facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult
sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification
of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM
facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case,
including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5)
data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7)
urine test results, and (8) for males, weights.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4020Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04278MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04278MiAaIMiAaI
Assessing Trends and Best Practices of Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Programs in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
Patrick Curtin
,
David Thomas
,
Daniel Felker
,
Eric Weingart
2007-09-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4278NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This trends and best practices evaluation geared toward
motor vehicle theft prevention with a particular focus on the Watch
Your Car (WYC) program was conducted between October 2002 and March
2004. On-site and telephone interviews were conducted with
administrators from 11 of 13 WYC member states. Surveys were mailed to
the administrators of auto theft prevention programs in 36 non-WYC
states and the 10 cities with the highest motor vehicle theft rates.
Completed surveys were returned from 16 non-WYC states and five of the
high auto theft rate cities. Part 1, the survey for Watch Your Car
(WYC) program members, includes questions about how respondents
learned about the WYC program, their WYC related program activities,
the outcomes of their program, ways in which they might have done
things differently if given the opportunity, and summary questions
that asked WYC program administrators for their opinions about various
aspects of the overall WYC program. The survey for the nonmember
states, Part 2, and cities, Part 3, collected information about motor
vehicle theft prevention within the respondent's state or city and
asked questions about the respondent's knowledge of, and opinions
about, the Watch Your Car program.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1
auto thefticpsrcrime control programsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrcrime reductionicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstolen propertyicpsrstolen vehiclesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD I. Attitude SurveysCurtin, PatrickThomas, DavidFelker, DanielWeingart, EricInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4278Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08185MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08185MiAaIMiAaI
Calling the Police
[electronic resource] Citizen Reporting of Serious Crime, 1979
William Spelman
,
Dale K. Brown
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8185NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset replicates the citizen reporting component of
POLICE RESPONSE TIME ANALYSIS, 1975 (ICPSR 7760). Information is
included on 4,095 reported incidents of aggravated assault, auto
theft, burglary, larceny/theft offenses, forcible rape, and
robbery. The data cover citizen calls to police between April 21 and
December 7, 1979. There are four files in this collection, one each
for Jacksonville, Florida, Peoria, Illinois, Rochester, New York, and
San Diego, California. The data are taken from police dispatch records
and police interviews of citizens who requested police assistance.
Variables taken from the dispatch records include the dispatch time,
call priority, police travel time, age, sex, and race of the caller,
response code, number of suspects, and area of the city in which the
call originated. Variables taken from the citizen interviews include
respondent's role in the incident (victim, caller, victim-caller,
witness-caller), incident location, relationship of caller to victim,
number of victims, identification of suspect, and interaction with
police.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1
assaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcitizen crime reportingicpsrlarcenyicpsroffensesicpsrpolice citizen interactionsicpsrpolice protectionicpsrpolice reportsicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrvictimsicpsrwitnessesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IX. PoliceSpelman, WilliamBrown, Dale K.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8185Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08185.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27541MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27541MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-02-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27541NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP, which is conducted biennially, asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children. The concatenated data include the seven years of CJRP data in one file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27541Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27541.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04673MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04673MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1997 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4673NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4673Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04673.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04674MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04674MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 1999 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4674NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 1999, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4674Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04674.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04670MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04670MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2001 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4670NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2001, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4670Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04670.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23480MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23480MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2003 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR23480NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2003, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1
juvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23480Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23480.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24300MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24300MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2006 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR24300NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2006, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24300Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24300.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34401MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34401MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2007 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34401NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1
property crimesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34401Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34401.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34448MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34448MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2010 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34448NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (CJRP) was administered for the first time in 1997 by the United States Bureau of the Census, for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). CJRP replaced the Census of Public and Private Juvenile Detention, Correctional, and Shelter Facilities, also known as the Children in Custody (CIC) census, which had been conducted since the early 1970s. The CJRP differs fundamentally from CIC in that the CIC collected aggregate data on juveniles held in each facility (e.g., number of juveniles in the facility) and the CJRP, which is conducted biennially, collects an individual record on each juvenile held in the residential facility to provide a detailed picture of juveniles in custody. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. In 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected. Each record in the data that provides information about a juvenile also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held. Therefore, the CJRP data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Some state and regional agencies provide CJRP data for more than one facility under their jurisdiction. The census was not sent to adult facilities or to facilities exclusively for drug or mental health treatment or for abused or neglected children.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1
property crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34448Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34448.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27543MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27543MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27543NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27541) and the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were matched on the facility identifier to create one data file. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Each record in the concatenated matched data file provides information about the juvenile and also includes the characteristics of the facility in which the juvenile was held from both the CJRP and JRFC collections. Therefore, these data can be analyzed at the juvenile or facility level. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2
educational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrperson offensesicpsrpregnancyicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27543Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27543.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27544MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27544MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched Facility-Level Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27544NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the facility level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the facility level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched facility-level data provide information about the characteristics of the facility from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in that facility from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date are included in this file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not be included in this concatenated matched facility-level file. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2
status offensesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrperson offensesicpsrpregnancyicpsrproperty crimesicpsrvaccinesicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27544Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27544.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27545MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27545MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement and Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 1997-2010 -- Concatenated Matched State-Level Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27545NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the CENSUS OF JUVENILES IN RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT (CJRP) AND JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 1997-2010 -- CONCATENATED MATCHED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27543) that were aggregated to the state level. The CJRP asked juvenile residential custody facilities in the United States to describe each youth assigned a bed in the facility on a specified reference date. For 1997, the reference date was the fifth Wednesday in October. For 1999-2003 and 2007, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October. For 2006 and 2010, the reference date was the fourth Wednesday in February. Characteristics of the facility, treatment services, and facility population were also collected in the CJRP. The JRFC collected information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, ownership, and use of bed space in the facility. The JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. The JRFC also identified the type of facility, which was complemented with a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The JRFC census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the concatenated matched data file (ICPSR 27543) were aggregated to the state level. Therefore, the CJRP/JRFC concatenated matched state-level data provide information about the characteristics of juvenile residential facilities in the state from both the CJRP and JRFC collections and the juvenile population held in these facilities from the CJRP collection. Only facilities that held at least one juvenile for an offense on the CJRP census reference date were included in the concatenated matched file, i.e., all facilities in the biennial JRFC data may not have been included in the file used for the aggregation. Variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were also added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrdrug law offensesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrperson offensesicpsrpregnancyicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstatus offensesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27545Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27545.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31281MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31281MiAaIMiAaI
Collecting DNA from Juveniles in 30 U.S. States, 2009-2010
[electronic resource]
Julie Samuels
,
Allison Dwyer
,
Robin Halberstadt
,
Pamela Lachman
2014-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31281NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined the laws, policies, and practices
related to juvenile DNA collection, as well as their implications for the juvenile and criminal justice systems. DNA evidence proved valuable in solving crimes, which motivated a concerted effort to expand the categories of offenders who provided DNA samples for analysis and inclusion in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)-operated national database.
State requirements for DNA collection, which initially focused on adult offenders convicted of sexual or violent offenses, expanded to include other categories of convicted felons, convicted misdemeanants, arrestees, and juveniles. In 30 states, certain categories of juveniles handled in the juvenile justice system must now provide DNA samples. The study was designed to explore the practice and implications of collecting DNA from juveniles and addressed the following questions:
How have state agencies, juvenile justice agencies and state laboratories implemented juvenile DNA collection laws?
What were the number and characteristics of juveniles with profiles included in CODIS?
How have juvenile profiles in CODIS contributed to public safety or other justice outcomes?
What improvements to policies and practices needed to be made?
To examine these questions, researchers at the Urban Institute: (1) systematically reviewed all state DNA statutes; (2) conducted semi-structured interviews with CODIS lab representatives in states that collect DNA from juveniles to understand how the laws were implemented; (3) collected and analyzed descriptive data provided by these labs on the volume and characteristics of juvenile profiles in CODIS; (4) conducted semi-structured interviews with juvenile and criminal justice stakeholders in five case study states; and (5) convened a meeting of federal officials and experts from the forensic and juvenile justice committees to explore the broader impacts of juvenile DNA collection.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31281.v1
crime laboratoriesicpsrDNA fingerprintingicpsrjuvenile justiceicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrlaw enforcement agenciesicpsrpolicyicpsrrecords managementicpsrstate regulationsicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSamuels, JulieDwyer, AllisonHalberstadt, RobinLachman, PamelaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31281Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31281.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08002MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08002MiAaIMiAaI
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1972-1975 [United States]
[electronic resource]Cities Sample
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8002NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Crime Surveys, of which these Commercial
Victimization Surveys are a part, were conducted to obtain current and
reliable measures of serious crime in the United States. The
Commercial Victimization Surveys are restricted to coverage of
burglary and robbery incidents. They include all types of commercial
establishments as well as political, cultural, and religious
organizations. The survey includes a series of questions about the
business, e.g., type and size, form of ownership, insurance, security,
and break-in and robbery characteristics. Time and place, weapon,
injury, entry evidence, offender characteristics, and stolen property
data were collected for each of the incidents. Data on both victimized
and nonvictimized establishments in 26 different cities were collected
during 1972, 1973, and 1974. In the 1975 survey, data from the 13
cities surveyed during 1972 and 1973 were collected again.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2
armed robberyicpsrburglaryicpsrbusinessesicpsrcitiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrlarcenyicpsrnational crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsrorganizationsicpsrrobberyicpsrsecurity systemsicpsrurban crimeicpsrvictimizationicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8002Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08002.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08003MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08003MiAaIMiAaI
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1973-1977 [United States]
[electronic resource]National Sample
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8003NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These Commercial Victimization Surveys were collected as
part of the National Crime Surveys. They document burglary and robbery
incidents for all types of commercial establishments, as well as
political, cultural, and religious organizations. Business
characteristics gathered include form of ownership and operation, size
and type of business, and security measures. Information regarding the
reported incidents includes time and place, weapon involvement,
offender and entry characteristics, injuries and deaths, and type and
value of stolen property. Data were collected by calendar quarter for
four quarters in 1973-1976 and for two quarters in 1977, while the
actual incidents reported in the files reflect those occurring six
months prior to the interview date.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2
larcenyicpsrnational crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsrorganizationsicpsrrobberyicpsrsecurity systemsicpsrurban crimeicpsrvictimizationicpsrarmed robberyicpsrburglaryicpsrcitiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8003Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08003.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04578MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04578MiAaIMiAaI
Effects of Incarceration on Criminal Trajectories in the United States, 1994
[electronic resource]
Avinash Singh Bhati
2007-02-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4578NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Using data from RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994:
[UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3355), this study developed an analytical
approach to utilize detailed dated criminal arrest history information
in order to investigate whether, and to what extent, incarceration is
able to deter offenders from future offending. This data collection
consists of the syntax for a SAS macro used to estimate individual
specific offending micro-trajectories, project counterfactual
trajectories, and to assess the actual post-release offending patterns
against the backdrop of these counterfactuals. The arrest records of
individuals were clustered in chronological order and were truncated
after the first post-release re-arrest event. The key independent
variables used in estimating the pre-release criminal history
accumulation process included the arrest number, the age at first
arrest, whether or not the individual was confined as a result of the
previous arrest event, and a measure of the number of years taken to
reach each arrest event cumulated through the last arrest event. The
same set of basic variables were used to model first re-arrest after
release (recidivism).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1
arrest recordsicpsrconviction recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrrecidivismicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XII. Computer Programs and Instructional PackagesBhati, Avinash SinghInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4578Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04578.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25621MiAaIMiAaI
Impact of Legal Advocacy on Intimate Partner Homicide in the United States, 1976-1997
[electronic resource]
Laura Dugan
2009-07-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined the impacts of jurisdictions' domestic violence policies on violent behavior of family members and intimate partners, on the likelihood that the police discovered an incident, and on the likelihood that the police made an arrest. The research combined two datasets. Part 1 contains information on police, prosecution policies, and local victim services. Informants within the local agencies of the 50 largest cities in the United States were contacted and asked to complete a survey inventorying policies and activities by type and year of implementation. Data from completed surveys covered 48 cities from 1976 to 1996. Part 2 contains data on domestic violence laws. Data on state statutes from 1976 to 1997 that related to protection orders were collected by a legal expert for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1
arrestsicpsrcrime reportingicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrpolice reportsicpsrpolicy analysisicpsrstate legislaturesicpsrvictim servicesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesDugan, LauraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27542MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27542MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27542NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2
health care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrpregnancyicpsrcensus dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27542Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27542.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27546MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27546MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000-2010 -- Concatenated State-Level Data [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2013-03-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR27546NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection includes data from the JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY CENSUS (JRFC), 2000-2010 -- CONCATENATED DATA [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 27542) that were aggregated to the state level. The JRFC collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bed space in the facility to indicate whether the facility is experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. These four modules were not always collected each year. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. The JRFC has been administered biennially since 2000, in even-numbered years. The census reference date is the fourth Wednesday in October. Records in the JRFC concatenated data file (ICPSR 27542) were aggregated to the state level and variables providing United States Census population data and upper age of juvenile court jurisdiction were added. Data were harmonized so that variables present across years are identically named to facilitate analysis.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpregnancyicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27546Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27546.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04672MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04672MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR4672NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2000, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional educationicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpregnancyicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4672Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04672.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23520MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23520MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2002 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR23520NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2002, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the substance abuse treatment and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23520Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23520.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25282MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2004 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR25282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2004, the JRFC used two modules to collect information on the physical health and educational services provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional educationicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrpregnancyicpsrvaccinesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25282.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25981MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25981MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2006 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR25981NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2006, the JRFC used four modules to collect information on the physical health services, educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional educationicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrpregnancyicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrvaccinesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25981Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25981.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34402MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34402MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2008 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34402NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (juveniles)icpsrgroup homesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34402Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34402.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34449MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34449MiAaIMiAaI
Juvenile Residential Facility Census, 2010 [United States]
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
2014-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34449NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Juvenile Residential Facility Census (JRFC) collected basic information on facility characteristics, including size, structure, security arrangements, and ownership. It also collected information on the use of bedspace in the facility to indicate whether the facility was experiencing crowding. The JRFC included questions about the type of facility, such as detention center, training school, ranch, or group home. This information was complemented by a series of questions about other residential services provided by the facility, such as independent living, foster care, or other arrangements. In 2010, the JRFC used three modules to collect information on the educational services, substance abuse treatment, and mental health treatment provided to youth in these facilities. While not evaluating the effectiveness or quality of these services, the JRFC gathered important information about the youth the services were directed toward and how the services were provided. The census indicated the use of screenings or tests conducted to determine counseling, education, health, or substance abuse needs, and also examined prominent issues about conditions of confinement, including the restraint of youth and improper absences from the facility. Congress requires the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) to report annually on the number of deaths of juveniles in custody; JRFC collected information on such deaths for the one-year period just prior to the census reference date. The census reference date was the fourth Wednesday in October.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1
census dataicpsrcorrectional educationicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsreducational needsicpsrgroup homesicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrjuvenile detentionicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrjuvenilesicpsrmental health servicesicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34449Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34449.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20423MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20423MiAaIMiAaI
Law Enforcement Response to Human Trafficking and the Implications for Victims in the United States, 2005
[electronic resource]
Heather J. Clawson
,
Nicole Dutch
,
Megan Cummings
2011-06-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR20423NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of the study was to explore how local law enforcement were responding to the crime of human trafficking after the passage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) in 2000. The first phase of the study (Part 1, Law Enforcement Interview Quantitative Data) involved conducting telephone surveys with 121 federal, state, and local law enforcement officials in key cities across the country between August and November of 2005. Different versions of the telephone survey were created for the key categories of law enforcement targeted by this study (state/local investigators, police offices, victim witness coordinators, and federal agents). The telephone surveys were supplemented with interviews from law enforcement supervisors/managers, representatives from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Human Trafficking/Smuggling Office, the United States Attorney's Office, the Trafficking in Persons Office, and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. Respondents were asked about their history of working human trafficking cases, knowledge of human trafficking, and familiarity with the TVPA. Other variables include the type of trafficking victims encountered, how human trafficking cases were identified, and the law enforcement agency's capability to address the issue of trafficking. The respondents were also asked about the challenges and barriers to investigating human trafficking cases and to providing services to the victims. In the second phase of the study (Part 2, Case File Review Qualitative Data) researchers collected comprehensive case information from sources such as case reports, sanitized court reports, legal newspapers, magazines, and newsletters, as well as law review articles. This case review examined nine prosecuted cases of human trafficking since the passage of the TVPA. The research team conducted an assessment of each case focusing on four core components: identifying the facts, defining the problem, identifying the rule to the facts (e.g., in light of the rule, how law enforcement approached the situation), and conclusion.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20423.v1
exploitationicpsrhuman rightsicpsrhuman traffickingicpsrindentured servantsicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrsex traffickingicpsrslaveryicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemClawson, Heather J.Dutch, NicoleCummings, MeganInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20423Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20423.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03874MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03874MiAaIMiAaI
Mortality Detail and Multiple Cause of Death, 1981
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2007-07-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3874NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection presents information about the causes
of deaths occurring during 1981. Part 1, the Mortality Detail file,
describes every death or fetal death registered in the United States
for 1981. Part 2, Multiple Cause of Death, provides information about
the causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States,
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during
1981. Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death,
multiple conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence
of the deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an
autopsy was performed, and the month and day of death. In addition,
data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education,
usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple
cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL
STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH,
NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03874.v2
ageicpsrcauses of deathicpsrdeathicpsrdeath recordsicpsrethnicityicpsrfatalitiesicpsrgendericpsrmarital statusicpsrmortality ratesicpsrraceicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3874Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03874.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03905MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03905MiAaIMiAaI
Multiple Cause of Death, 1968-1973
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2007-05-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3905NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection presents information about the causes
of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1968 through 1973.
Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple
conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the
deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy
was performed, and the month and day of the week of the death. In
addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status,
education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the
deceased. The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the
MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES,
INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH, EIGHTH REVISION (ICD-8), VOLUMES 1 AND
2.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03905.v2
ageicpsrcauses of deathicpsrdeathicpsrdeath recordsicpsrethnicityicpsrfatalitiesicpsrgendericpsrmarital statusicpsrmortality ratesicpsrraceicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3905Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03905.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03906MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03906MiAaIMiAaI
Multiple Cause of Death, 1974-1978
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2007-05-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3906NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection presents information about the causes
of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1974 through 1978.
Data are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple
conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the
deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy
was performed, and the month and day of the week of the death. In
addition, data are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status,
education, usual occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased.
The multiple cause of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND
CAUSE-OF-DEATH, EIGHTH REVISION (ICD-8), VOLUMES 1 AND 2.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03906.v2
death recordsicpsrethnicityicpsrfatalitiesicpsrgendericpsrmarital statusicpsrmortality ratesicpsrraceicpsrcauses of deathicpsrdeathicpsrageicpsrICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3906Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03906.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03895MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03895MiAaIMiAaI
Multiple Cause of Death, 1979
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2007-05-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3895NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection presents information about the causes
of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1979. Data are
provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple conditions
that caused the death, place of death, residence of the deceased
(e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy was
performed, and the month and day of death. In addition, data are
supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual
occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause
of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL
STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH,
NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03895.v2
ageicpsrcauses of deathicpsrdeathicpsrdeath recordsicpsrethnicityicpsrfatalitiesicpsrgendericpsrmarital statusicpsrmortality ratesicpsrraceicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3895Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03895.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03897MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03897MiAaIMiAaI
Multiple Cause of Death, 1980
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2007-05-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3897NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection presents information about the causes
of deaths occurring during 1980. Included is information about the
causes of all recorded deaths occurring in the United States, Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa during 1981. Data
are provided concerning underlying causes of death, multiple
conditions that caused the death, place of death, residence of the
deceased (e.g., region, division, state, county), whether an autopsy
was performed, and the month and day of the death. In addition, data
are supplied on the sex, race, age, marital status, education, usual
occupation, and origin or descent of the deceased. The multiple cause
of death fields were coded from the MANUAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL
STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, INJURIES, AND CAUSE-OF-DEATH,
NINTH REVISION (ICD-9), VOLUMES 1 AND 2.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03897.v2
ageicpsrcauses of deathicpsrdeathicpsrdeath recordsicpsrethnicityicpsrfatalitiesicpsrgendericpsrmarital statusicpsrmortality ratesicpsrraceicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3897Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03897.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09880MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09880MiAaIMiAaI
Multiple Cause of Death, 1982
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics
2007-06-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9880NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection presents information about the causes
of deaths occurring in the United States during 1982. Data are provided
concerning underlying causes of death, place of death, whether there
were multiple conditions that caused the death, and what those
conditions were. In addition, data are provided on date of death, and
on sex, race, age, marital status, and origin or descent of the
deceased. Also included is information on residence of the deceased
(state, county, city, region, and whether the county was a metropolitan
or nonmetropolitan area). Data on whether an autopsy was performed and
the site of accidents are also provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09880.v1
ageicpsrcauses of deathicpsrdeathicpsrdeath recordsicpsrethnicityicpsrfatalitiesicpsrgendericpsrmarital statusicpsrmortality ratesicpsrraceicpsrNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.G. Social Institutions and Behavior, Vital StatisticsNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9880Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09880.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30983MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30983MiAaIMiAaI
Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE), 2003-2009
[electronic resource]
Shelli B. Rossman
,
John K. Roman
,
Janine M. Zweig
,
Michael Rempel
,
Christine H. Lindquist
2012-11-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR30983NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation (MADCE) study included 23 drug courts and 6 comparison sites selected from 8 states across the country. The purpose of the study was to: (1) Test whether drug courts reduce drug use, crime, and multiple other problems associated with drug abuse, in comparision with similar offenders not exposed to drug courts, (2) address how drug courts work and for whom by isolating key individual and program factors that make drug courts more or less effective in achieving their desired outcomes, (3) explain how offender attitudes and behaviors change when they are exposed to drug courts and how these changes help explain the effectiveness of drug court programs, and (4) examine whether drug courts generate cost savings.
Offenders in all 29 sites were surveyed in 3 waves, at baseline, 6 months later, and 18 months after enrollment. The research comprises three major components: process evaluation, impact evaluation, and a cost-benefit analysis. The process evaluation describes how the 23 drug court sites vary in program eligibility, supervision, treatment, team collaboration, and other key policies and practices. The impact evaluation examines whether drug courts produce better outcomes than comparison sites and tests which court policies and offender attitudes might explain those effects. The cost-benefit analysis evaluates drug court costs and benefits.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1
cost effectivenessicpsrcourt systemicpsrcourtsicpsrcrime controlicpsrcrime control policiesicpsrcrime control programsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug courtsicpsrdrug law enforcementicpsrdrug law offensesicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrprocess evaluationicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD V. CourtsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRossman, Shelli B.Roman, John K.Zweig, Janine M.Rempel, MichaelLindquist, Christine H.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30983Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30983.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06986MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06986MiAaIMiAaI
Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration
[electronic resource] [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992
Doris Layton MacKenzie
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6986NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp)
programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot
camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were
sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock
incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1)
changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during
incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during
and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community
supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables
measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes
toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic
variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and
military experience. The community supervision data contain
information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such
as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and
employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and
contacts with community supervision officers, along with
demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key
areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a
psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community
supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For
most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey
were different from those who were surveyed in the community
supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and
sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are
organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state
level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1
alcohol abuseicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsroffendersicpsrparoleicpsrprison inmatesicpsrprobationicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrshock incarceration programsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMacKenzie, Doris LaytonInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6986Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07658MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07658MiAaIMiAaI
National Crime Surveys
[electronic resource]Cities, 1972-1975
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7658NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This sample of the National Crime Survey contains
information about victimization in 26 central cities in the United
States. The data are designed to achieve three primary objectives: 1)
to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of
crime, 2) to estimate the numbers and types of crimes not reported to
police, and 3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes
and permit reliable comparisons over time and between areas of the
country. Information about each household or personal victimization was
recorded. The data include type of crime (attempts are covered as
well), description of offender, severity of crime, injuries or losses,
time and place of occurrence, age, race and sex of offender(s),
relationship of offenders to victims, education, migration, labor force
status, occupation, and income of persons involved.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3
census dataicpsrcitiesicpsrcrimeicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrhouseholdsicpsrvictimizationicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7658Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07658.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25521MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25521MiAaIMiAaI
Pretrial Release of Latino Defendants in the United States, 1990-2004
[electronic resource]
David Levin
2009-07-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25521NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
that is Latino over the last six years and change in the percentage of the county population that is African American over the last six years. Cross-level interaction variables include percentage minority (Latino/African American) population zero percent to 15 percent, percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 16 percent to 30 percent, and percentage minority (Latino/African American) population 31 percent or higher.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25521.v1
bailicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrimmigrationicpsrpopulation growthicpsrpretrial releaseicpsrDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingLevin, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25521Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25521.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08673MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08673MiAaIMiAaI
Recidivism Among Young Parolees
[electronic resource]a Study of Inmates Released from Prison in 22 States, 1978
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
1997-05-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8673NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examines the criminal activities of a group of
young offenders after their release from prison to parole supervision.
Previous studies have examined recidivism using arrests as the
principal measure, whereas this study examines a variety of factors,
including length of incarceration, age, sex, race, prior arrest
record, prosecutions, length of time between parole and rearrest,
parolees not prosecuted for new offenses but having their parole
revoked, rearrests in states other than the paroling states, and the
nature and location of rearrest charges. Parolees in the 22 states
covered in this study account for 50 percent of all state prisoners
paroled in the United States in 1978.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08673.v2
arrestsicpsrcrimeicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrparole systemsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8673Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08673.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03355MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03355MiAaIMiAaI
Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-12-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3355NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994
is a database containing information on each of 38,624 sampled
prisoners released from prisons in 15 states in 1994 and tracked for
three years following their release. The majority of the database
consists of information on each released prisoner's entire officially
recorded criminal history (before and after the 1994 release). Sources
for criminal history information are state and FBI automated RAP
("Records of Arrests and Prosecutions") sheets, which contain records
of arrests, adjudications, and sentences. The study is the second
major recidivism study conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The first study, RECIDIVISM AMONG RELEASED PRISONERS, 1983: [UNITED
STATES] (ICPSR 8875), tracked over 16,000 prisoners released in 11
states in 1983 for three years. These two studies are the
closest approximation to "national" recidivism studies in the United
States. They are distinguished by their large sample size (over 16,000
released prisoners in the first study, 38,624 in the second),
geographic breadth of coverage (11 states in the first study, 15 in
the second), length of prospective tracking (three years from date of
release in both studies), ability to track the movement of released
prisoners across state boundaries (both studies), and multiple
measures of recidivism (both studies). Demographic data include race,
ethnicity, sex, and date of birth.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8
conviction recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsroffensesicpsrrecidivismicpsrarrest recordsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3355Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07899MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07899MiAaIMiAaI
Survey of American Prisons and Jails, 1979
[electronic resource]
Abt Associates
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7899NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains information gathered in a
two-part survey that was designed to assess institutional conditions
in state and federal prisons and in halfway houses. It was one of a
series of data-gathering efforts undertaken during the 1970s to assist
policymakers in assessing and overcoming deficiencies in the nation's
correctional institutions. This particular survey was conducted in
response to a mandate set forth in the Crime Control Act of 1976. Data
were gathered via self-enumerated questionnaires that were mailed to
the administrators of all 558 federal and state prisons and all 405
community-based prerelease facilities in existence in the United
States in 1979. Part 1 contains the results of the survey of state and
federal adult correctional systems, and Part 2 contains the results of
the survey of community-based prerelease facilities. The two files
contain similar variables designed to tap certain key aspects of
confinement: (1) inmate (or resident) counts by sex and by security
class, (2) age of facility and rated capacity, (3) spatial density,
occupancy, and hours confined for each inmate's (or resident's)
confinement quarters, (4) composition of inmate (or resident)
population according to race, age, and offense type, (5) inmate (or
resident) labor and earnings, (6) race, age, and sex characteristics
of prison (or half-way house) staff, and (7) court orders by type of
order and pending litigation. Other data (contained in both files)
include case ID number, state ID number, name of facility, and
operator of facility (e.g., federal, state, local, or private).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07899.v2
lawsuitsicpsroffensesicpsrprison administrationicpsrprison conditionsicpsrsentencingicpsrstate correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional guardsicpsrcourt ordersicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrfederal correctional facilitiesicpsrhalfway housesicpsrinmate classificationicpsrinmate programsicpsrinmatesicpsrjailsicpsrprerelease programsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsAbt AssociatesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7899Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07899.v2