On 12/05/2010 07:17, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Firmicus<Firmicus at gmx.net> wrote:
>>> Certainly this is because glib-perl needs to be recompiled with perl 5.12.
>> Other perl packages that include binary libraries may need to be recompiled
>> too. We need a TODO list for such perl packages...
>>>>> any package that's not arch any needs to be rebuilt. also watch for
> actual compiling...
Right, all non-any perl packages should be rebuilt. I'll send Kevin a
preliminary TODO list for such packages in extra and community (I found
209 of them... yerk! but as you say there must be many that are actually
arch=any). Most probably we also need to rebuild all packages that use
libperl.so. Last year the list of such pkgs was:
claws-mail-extra-plugins
gnumeric
gvim
inkscape
irssi
mod_perl
rxvt-unicode
rxvt-unicode-256color
vim
weechat
xchat
xchat-gnome
Any other since?
> I suspect that some not arch any packages should
> be arch any. I found 1 the other day.
>
I just found these:
gnupod
smtpprox
colordiff
hacburn
perlpanel
postfix-policyd-spf-perl
If you know any other then please report it on FlySpray, thanks!
F