From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.

Contents

Keep It's about booze, so it can't be all bad (and yes, I am still sulking). -- di Mario 13:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete

Delete. A 10-minute scribble. To author: Put some bloody effort in, laddie. To everyone else: Merry Christmas, or Happy Druid Days, and thank God the days are getting longer if you're not in Oz or Ned Zed.----OEJ 16:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Bundy was a friend of mine. He deserves better. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 01:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, and his brother Al had his own TV sitcom, with a rather yummy looking blond who was always finding interesting ways in which to ... nevermind (still sulking) -- di Mario 13:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Abstain! Being a virgin myself, or was it Pisces ? March 30, 1960..Year of the Dragon. Figures. Anyroads, there's a companion article Virgin Mobile that is a lot more funny. -- di Mario 13:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

I would like to vote "Keep" because the idea is worthy, but as I am unable to do the required heavy lifting to rewrite and expand the piece I must abstain. An ab stain is when you spill red wine on your stomach, incidentally, and are too drunk to wipe it off before it dries.----OEJ 16:21, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

norton disk wipe I allmost voted keep (yes I am still sulking) but then I saw at the end he defiles the name of Alan Turing (the Sophia of computer nerds) and that made me very sad...-- di Mario 14:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Give Absurdism a fair chance of polishing it up. As as for the critizism that we already have God v Nietsche, maybe we could start a whole series of mock debates in their own category. "Irresistable Force" versus "Unmovable Object" springs to mind, or Kramer vs Kramer... -- di Mario 14:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

keep. I reformated it, much less ugly and much easier to read now - jack mort |cunt| talk - 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete

I DISApprove This Message Nothing but quotes. Not even remotely funny. 00:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

This is really great. On December 8, somebody rewrites the article into babble, and on December 22 it is posted for deletion without anybody noticing the original version. Good job. --Kokot.kokotisko 21:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Sincerely, I've noticed your previous version. Noticed. Hell, I've really noticed it. This is a wiki, y'know? You better watch your dear hatchlings more carefully. By the way, I'm not starting an edit war, so I will copy my version to my userpage an see what happens. As it concerns to me, your version is still VFDed, but I will not cast the first vote. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 22:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

KeepMost categories are inherently pointless, thats why you hardly see them around, except in most of my articles, since I love the little buggers.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I guess this list is made for military leaders who got caught by the Russian winter. Did you miss this History class? -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 01:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't understand deleting it, since it's a catergory and not a real page. Prolix 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Most acategories are inherently pointless, thats why you hardly see them around, except in most of my articles, since I love the little buggers (yes, its a copypaste).--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so call me nit-picky, but why is there a redicting userpage, of a user who does not yet exist but may someday, that links to first the userpage and now the talk page of a user with a simialrly spelt and pronounced name, but yet has no links to it? I am aware that the User namespace is typically left alone, but if a User:Mowglee signs up for Uncyclopedia, he/she shouldn't have to be given a userpage which already links to Mowgli's. --SirZombiebaron 08:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

This is well below the level of acceptable humor. Anything even remotely as bad as this should be deleted without mercy. Just because you've seen worse doesn't mean this isn't delete-worthy shit: it is. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 02:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Interesting. One of the first Google hits on A. Wyatt Mann, the cartoonist whose work is featured at the bottom of MLK, is quite the cesspool of anti-Semitism, holocaust denial, and paranoid conspiracy theories involving communism. The article being voted on appears to be a soapbox for this viewpoint.----OEJ 15:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Oops, here's a linky. ----OEJ 15:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Oooh, that is clever! I'm curious about the user of the pseudonym, though. There's an A. Wyatt Mann cartoon of the day page here, he's mentioned on the lovably cute-n-cuddly jew-hater Vangard News Netword forum, and an anti-hate page quotes a "poem" by him that begins "KIKE, KIKE, Weasel-like, / scheming since a hook-nosed tyke..." So I suspect there is a real rodent human behind the pseudo. An interesting thing to track down. Any leads appreciated...an article is now officially gestating.----OEJ 17:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I think it's odd that A. Wyatt Mann chooses to rip off R. Crumb for this anti-semetic piece. Not sure if that qualifies as irony or not? - Lemon. 21:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep. Wasn't this up for VFH before? And didn't I vote for it? goshzillacorrespondence 09:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep - So what if it's an AAAAAAAAA! clone? There's tons of them here. (Nobody touch Beaker!) --AAA!(AAAA) 09:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Right, I am a bit of a deletionist when it comes to clones, but this is one instance I will allow myself to accept. Just about. Have you never seen The Shining?-- HindleyiteConverse 15:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep - Hell, maybe if this author's lucky, this will become another Uncyclopedia "in-joke." --El Destructeso 22:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep -- I'll be very sad if this goes away. If we hadn't already featured Aaaaaaaaaa!, I would nominate this for featured article. -- Rei 00:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep -- Lots of spaghetti westerns are bad, lots of B-Movies are bad, most AAAAAAA! clones are bad, there are exceptions to near everything, and this, is an exception. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Even I have my limits. For example, I can't drive fifty-five, but seventy is way too much for me.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Huff. Too many of them already, and it's not that great. -- 10:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete. AAAAAAAAA! is funny the first time, after that it's a bore. A clone is not funny at all. And this one is just stupid -- to be logical it would be all WorkWorkWork. Which would still be stupid. ----OEJ 15:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Comments

OEJ seems unfamiliar with the Shining and the countless cultural references to it. -- Rei 07:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep -- not all that wonderful, but it's not really an AAAAAAAAA! clone in my opinion. It has other words in it. Sort of.----OEJ 21:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

k33p - I don't understand why you guys get so bent out of shape about AAAAAAAAA! clones. It wouldn't be a good running gag if people didn't rip it off all of the time. However, I do admit that all of the AAAAAAAAA! clones are kind of getting annoying, so could you guys please stop? --El Destructeso 23:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Zinging Corona? WTF? This must have been written by a true beer connoisseur; the kind of guy who likes the way that Schlitz leaves crud in his glass...--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Huff. And hasn't this been here before? -- 10:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Some guy complained in the VD that his article, this one to be precise, was deleted. -- HindleyiteConverse 16:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete If there is a drastic, immediate overhaul, I'll change my vote. --LLBean

Comments

Even though I don't think this is very good, I would feel guilty if I said to delete this. That's because I couldn't finish it 'cuz it was sp awful. But still. --El Destructeso 19:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep - I don't really think this is all that bad. While I will admit it's not the funniest article, I believe with a little bit of work it will be worth keeping. Like, maybe if the person wrote it as someone who is trying to attain world domination, and he is trying to convince the readers how great it is. --El Destructeso 00:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Needs to be more about spoilers, I tried to help it a bit. Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Keep. Don't Delete it Yet!!! - Guys, before you delete this, reread. I rewrote everything on the page and its probably funnier now. (Note: I am not the original author. If the original author doesn't like what I did to his page, sorry.) --El Destructeso 19:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Please God, delete it all! Poor Bob tried, but the NRV tag proved too much for him. Shame that the article's old as it is... But please, seriously, this is about as bad at gets, just fucking delete it. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Even our NRV tag proved futile against this tyrannical article. Delete it before it kills more! --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 01:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Wait a minute. I think this is genuine vanity, but read it. This is great. We (Jews) are the definition of greedy (it's an inside joke not meant to offend anyone).-edit- We can however be quite compasionate. And we are romantic as hell, especially French Jews c'mon - that's a VFH line right there. - Lemon. 21:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

actually needs some work, but there are a lot worse out there. And the incoherency is, at least, consistent.no, yuochat 13:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep. This is a substantial, well-formatted article containing actual jokes and pics. It could use revision (the last bit about "Kelly" should be deleted). But it is not VFD material in my iggnerant opinion.----OEJ 16:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Complete Rewrite. There's no way we can do without a Vietnam War article, but this is just dumb. LLBean--Actually, I take it back. It gets better if you wade through the nonsensical opening. --LLBean

Rewrite. But this is better than a blank page. Lemon. 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete

Looks like a lot of work went into here or not. About as funny as what an 8 year old kid could write. Nothing even makes sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byLamrock (talk • contribs)

Keep. Needs work on consistency and flow, and some original-type pics. Flawed but still better than many articles -- stuff like Fran Drescher and Namine. I think it is above the VFD bar at this time.----OEJ 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Attack with Lawnmower but Keep There might be decent jokes in there, but the density is simply ridiculous. --LLBean

meh Killy, although I did like this one line: Journal of Applied Lobotomy Candidate Studies and Nonstandard Floor Buffer Applications , so keep thaqt one line. no, yuochat 13:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete. While Googling, I did find this one bit that the article was missing - [the point] - place it where you will. Lemon. 21:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Let me reiterate. VOTING IS OVER. This constitutes an abuse of VFD; and Shas'O'my'gosh has been blocked by Famine for 3 days for this. I'm tempted to follow suit with everyone who voted here after I posted the "denied" remark. Guys, I'm certain this was done before. —RT. HON.HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER(BEG FOR MERCY)03:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Huff Vanity, not funny in any way whatsoever. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete Just delete it already.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes indeed. If it exists, it should be about the site. This is all about the forums. Lemon. 17:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

It just keeps going, and going, until it gets Deleted --Alksub 22:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Possibly a definitive test of any "no web-forum vanity pages allowed" policy? The thing goes back to March 2005, with probably 400+ edits. I watch its fate, the response to it, with detached interest.----OEJ 00:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

If you've ever watched "Who's Line is it Anyway," Colin's the bald guy. Just so you know. —HinoaKUN(talk) 03:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete - This is exactly what this site is not for. You're not just supposed to make stupid mentions of Gary Coleman and God and Vin Deasel and expect it to be funny. It's just random and annoying. --El Destructeso 01:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The International School of Port of Spain in Trinidad-and-Tobago is "an accredited, private, independent school" which "provides an excellent education for students from the Caribbean and around the world" and has "a dedicated, experienced, multinational faculty that promotes and delivers an education of the highest calibre." The Uncyc article appears to be a standard-issue parody-by-a-student. Whether the article escapes school-vanity class is arguable. ----OEJ 01:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep - I honestly don't see what the problem with this article is. I think it was quite funny. I especially liked the quote "It's one of the mysteries of the force...or some crap like that." I think this person did a good job on following Uncyclopedia's rules for being funny: he kept it consistent, he blended fact and fiction, and he added an Oscar Wilde quote. I definitely believe this article is worth keeping. --El Destructeso 17:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Uncertain Delete There might be some hidden joke here, like it's a parody of a band I've never heard of, but as far as I can tell there is no band called BEE so I might aswell vote it out.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete - I will admit, this has the potential to be a lot funnier. Maybe if it talked more about corn dogs being a "delicacy," but not about the Civil Rights Movement or any of that other stuff. It's just not funny. --El Destructeso 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I don't know anything about the subject (or Sonic for that matter), but it smells like stupid, pointless, stereotypical furry bashing. Are we ED? Also, it was NRV'd by Hinoa on November 26. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 08:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

This article has sex with animals Prolix 13:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Burn it and let us watch. --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Please, for the love of God, delete this!! - This article isn't funny. It's just stupid. To be honest, I could not even get through the entire page without stopping. Uncyclopedia is not about acting retarded and gay-bashing. It's about acting mildly- retarded and gay-bashing. --El Destructeso 17:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

SMITE!!! Stereotypical making fun of homosexuals. not funny.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Rewrite It's crap, but we need the entry.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Comments

I don't think it's bad enough to delete, but I also don't think it's good enough the way it is to keep. This article has potential, but if it's not changed soon, I'm going to change my vote to "delete." --El Destructeso 01:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

delete just delete it please.--Shas'O'my'gosh 12:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Dilate from A to Horsium edit history shows the article has been developed throughout the last year, but lately only by an IP. And we all know what that means! Oh, and I added the dreaded template-- di Mario 22:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep and open it as a Community Renovation Project. Someone added the blues names Mute Tomato Reagan and OCD Prune Coolidge, and the sample blues lyrics about the iPod and Enron. So we can make it better! All we have to do is change all the plagiarized jokes to original ones. We can do it. We are that smart!----OEJ 02:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC) --eh, comment, I have revised a little bit and put unrevised, plagiarized material in blue font. ----OEJ 03:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Agree and huff It is funny, but someone else thought of it first. Uncyc should respect other peoples copyrights, I believe it is in the magna charta somewhere. Nice work though...-- di Mario 21:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

This article is in kind of a predicament. It could be funnier, but I have no idea how. The list wasn't very funny, but the basic idea of the article was. Although I'm kind of leaning towards deletion, I think you should give this article a chance. It is a stub, though... --El Destructeso 02:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Just another version of the Snakes on a Plane sequels, without the funny. --Imp88 10:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete - I will admit that some of the movies, like Beavis and Borat do America or Kill Borat are kind of funny, but overall it's repetitive and annoying. --El Destructeso 02:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Response to di Mario The difference between this and Ice_Cream_Flavors_Not_in_the_Top_100 is that stankee candles does not give any form of description to their different candles, while Ice Cream Flavors does.

Despite the unfortunal gaffe of talking about things that haven't happened yet, this is an oddity that I don't mind.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Weak keep The premisse is rather original (I am a sucker for time travel stories). Maybe the execution will improve as time goes by...You must remember this, a kiss is still a kiss, a sigh is but a sigh, the ordinary things apply, as time...goes...by! Of all of the gin joints and she had to walk into mine. Hit it Stevie (Sorry, Carli Simon on the stereo over here) -- di Mario 20:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Extremely strong KEEP It is entirely true what Smartiblartfast writes: this is a classic and there are at least 500 articles linking to it. You would have to be Bat Fuck Insane to put this on VFD. Oh wait, it was Lemon. Huh? Gronk? She's not Bat Fuck Insane! WTF ?! -- di Mario 19:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete

Delete Not only is this shit, but I'd hazard to guess that over half of it is stolen shit. Lemon. 07:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

KILL It's piss poor and not funny. At the very least, it needs the steady hand of an editor who is NOT a chronic masturbator. --DarthFredd 06:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Jesus, didn't realize this was such a fan favorite. Sorry. Lemon. 22:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

You know when a friend tells a joke, then you don't laugh, and he says, "You had to be there."? This is one of those.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I hate to present this in so crude a manner, but your mom actually was fabulous. And before you start to snigger, your mom was fabulous too. Man the way she reacted to those handcuffs...grade A material. And I have it all on tape... -- di Mario 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

There are people who know what this page says. I am not one of those people. So I'll have to render my vote based on the fact that it's formatted real purdy-like. Maybe a pic would help teach me what an Alien Swarm is.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep A lot of work has gone into this page, and it is not that bad. -- di Mario 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)