Posted
by
Soulskill
on Saturday May 10, 2014 @04:58PM
from the i'll-stick-with-a-dumb-tv,-thanks dept.

An anonymous reader writes "A article on The Register titled talks about a demo that was given in London last month by NCC Group where they turned a modern TV into an audio bug. 'The devices contain microphones and cameras that can be utilized by applications — Skype and similar apps being good examples. The TV has a fairly large amount of storage, so would be able to hold more than 30 seconds of audio – we only captured short snippets for demonstrations purposes. A more sophisticated attack could store more audio locally and only upload it at certain times, or could even stream it directly to a server, bypassing the need to use any of the device’s storage.' Given the Snowden revelations and what we've seen previously about older tech being deprecated, how can we protect ourselves with the modern devices (other than not connecting them to the Internet)?"

We need open hardware. The hardware being made in the factories is not trustworthy.

For the majority who won't click links and read articles, the gist is, there's a 3G radio antenna and a special dedicated processor inside of your CPU, and it can be used to either take complete control of your device, or to destroy it. All the details are there in Intel's marketing material.

If you can't be bothered to, at least, read the fucking comment... holy fucking christ on a cracker. fuck you. I bet you comment on submissions without even reading the fucking summary, much less the article. Come on, dipshit.... RTF* or GTFO.

No, idiot, I can't even tell what his argument is because he never states it in his fucking post. Just a link to info wars, which no sane person will bother clicking. The intel video is meaningless without knowing what his fucking point is.

Perhaps you should Read His Last Fucking Sentence then, dipshit.

Pretty goddamn pathetic when he summarized his point mere words later and you couldn't even be bothered to finish reading it.

You get that he's being paid to pollute this forum with this type of confusion, right? This is his 9-5 job.

Never attribute to stupidity what is easily explained by malice. The enemy is active, intelligent, malicious and not easily pinned down.

For example, there's a whole host of conversation going on these days about "Why does the NSA fail to implement basic security measures that could have prevented Snowden from doing what he did."

The answer is to act just as they do, and look at the metadata. Don't try to put your finger on who exactly did this or that, but try to understand their nature, goals and motivations... to define them in the abstract, and act against them in the abstract.

Who is served by an easily compromised NSA? Organized crime? Multinational corporations? Israeli intelligence? Doesn't matter exactly who, if you understand their nature, you can fuck with their agenda without ever knowing who they are.

Even uncompromised they requested an allied foreign intelligence agency to spy on an Indonesian cigarette manufacturer to uncover trade secrets. Such an odd incident appears to indicate that they are serving a US tobacco company. The full story would be interesting - how much does it cost to hire the NSA to spy on a competitor?

I'm pretty sure that that won't work if you follow the grandparent post's advice, "unplug them from the wall when they are not in use." I did not see anything in those links you posted about those chips working when there was no electricity to the device.

I'm pretty sure that that won't work if you follow the grandparent post's advice, "unplug them from the wall when they are not in use." I did not see anything in those links you posted about those chips working when there was no electricity to the device.

Speaking of "grandparents", take a look at those around today. Those happened to be the last generation of people who actually powered electronic devices off, and knew what it was like to walk around without the electronic leash of social media shoved up their ass 24 hours a day.

Therefore, that "advice" to power shit off when "not in use" is rather meaningless, especially as more and more people shift entertainment to a cellular device that never powers off or leaves their side.

Except that the advice was not to "power it off" when not in use. The advice was to unplug them from the wall.

Today's generation is so lazy they have remote controls for laptops.

This laziness was so powerful in fact that the industry response was not to find ways to get people more active. No, instead they invented smart power strips so people can turn their shit on and off with their cell phone.

Needless to say, the advice is yet again, meaningless and the example not without irony.

Except that the advice was not to "power it off" when not in use. The advice was to unplug them from the wall.

Are you aware that if you take an old television apart and go poking your fingers around in there, you'll very likely be killed, even if the television has been unplugged for over a year. They contain capacitors that will hold a deadly charge for a very long time after you unplug them.

You really think something they designed in these types of capabilities for espionage, but are going to be stymied by you unplugging the thing?

The US government controls what hardware is contained in those televisions. They

Are you aware that if you take an old television apart and go poking your fingers around in there, you'll very likely be killed, even if the television has been unplugged for over a year. They contain capacitors that will hold a deadly charge for a very long time after you unplug them.

Which is a non sequitar. If you are going into the television, you discharge the capacitor. The closest thing I can come up with is that you are sying the cap is a power source. Won't work.

You really think something they designed in these types of capabilities for espionage, but are going to be stymied by you unplugging the thing?

The US government controls what hardware is contained in those televisions. They forced the issue when they were moving away from free-to-air television. If you've been coming to slashdot for a long time, you read all about it.

So, what evidence do you have of this? How is the "snooping" device powered? What frequencies does it operate on? All this is very simple stuff. You can't hide power sources, you can't hide RF. You can't power unpowered things. I could open the back of a smart TV and find the needed components pretty quickly. You'd need a battery, an RF transmitter, and antenna. Looking, and a multimeter, and a cheap radio (I'd use a spectrum analyzer) are all you need. I forgot - a screwdriver. But trivial to find. Can't change the laws of physics, no matter how advanced the paranoia.

Which brings the conversation into the territory of Why exactly people believe some of the crazy stuff they believe.

The idea of a television with internet access being able to spy on you is one thing - not a technological issue in that at all, the belief that the television still does this after there is no energy to do this any more is somewhat bizzare.

But that's what we live in these days. People who utterly reject science, the NutterWhackers - But they will immediately take up with nonsense like this

I was a television repairman in another life (before disposable TVs) and the only place that carries enough voltage and amperage to kill you is the high voltage transformer. To discharge, simply attach a ground to a screwdriver, insert under the tube connection point.(the wire from the top of the transformer to the side of the tube, notable for a large round rubber connector.) If there is a charge you hear a snap and it's discharged. If you hear nothing, there was no charge.

In addition, 3G is unlikely to work inside a metal PC case with the teeny-tiny antenna that would fit on a CPU substrate. The technology seems to be aimed at portable devices and requires an external antenna connection to have any hope of getting a connection.

Where in the Intel video you posted a link to does it mention "3G" or "wireless". It infers "wireless" but I don't see anymore than that. Which standards do these "3G" chips support? EVDO? UMTS? Also, what frequency bands?IPMI can do many of the management things Intel is crowing about in the video. Including powering on the server when it is powered off and getting KVM sessions.

Previous versions of Intel Anti-Theft Technology enabled authorized IT or service personnel to send a coded "poison pill" over the Internet to completely disable a lost or stolen computer and help prevent access to its encrypted data and deter theft. New Intel AT 3.0 enables the poison pill to be sent as an encrypted, authenticated SMS message by an authorized administrator over a 3G cellular network as well within moments after a missing laptop is turned on. When recovered, the PC can be similarly re-activated with another message. Its new Locator Beacon capability gives authorities the ability to pinpoint a missing laptop using GPS technology on select 3G modems.

Presumably this 3G radio can transmit as well as receive. I tried to find more informative datasheets but Intel's website sucks and I couldn't find more on it.

Or just don't buy a TV that comes right out of 1984 with a camera and mic included. If you want to Skype, get separate (probably better...) inputs, and connect them up via a system you control and trust.

I'm rapidly coming around to the view that it should be legally required for anything you buy to declare all sensors it includes (camera, mic, GPS, WiFi receiver, etc.) and all networking capabilities (wired or wireless) prominently on the packaging, and to provide a hardwired switch to disable these facilit

1984: A cautionary tale about the power of the state and the dangers of ubiquitous surveillance.

2014: A real life documentary in which everyone carries around a mobile phone, everyone's car includes trackers with automatic remote location capabilities, major population centres are observed by numerous cameras logging to central databases under government control and backed by technology doing everything from facial recognition to gait analysis, even the privacy of your own home isn't private because there are literally cameras tucked away on your TV, and lots of people are OK with this as long as the pizza is still hot when it gets delivered and arrives in time for tonight's reality TV show.

If you study the eastern philosophies, you will find that hot pizza is more important to happiness than whether or not someone else knows what you are doing.

It would be the height of conceit to believe that what you do in your living room is interesting enough for anyone important or in-power to care about. I worked at a company that had "listening bug" phones on every desk in every office - we still talked openly in front of the phones, openly disparaging the leadership, their policies, their personal hab

The problem is that it no longer requires someone to car about what you do.

Computers can analyze the happenings far faster than humans can, and on a far larger scale, and so all they have to do is tell them to look for something interesting, like your drinking habit or having sex with your neighbor. Then they can be notified about things they otherwise wouldn't have time or money to put the effort into finding.

If you go with XBMC may I recommend setting Dirty Regions to 1 instead of the default of 3? It gives XBMC a nice speed boost and drops its CPU-usage a whole bunch. See http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php... [xbmc.org] for details.

Exactly. Show me another way I can watch Masterchef Australia in the US (which is produced by Murdock's wife's company, Shine, but still the best of the Masterchef shows.) Most of our viewing is BBC, CBC or PBS. I could get my PBS with an antenna (I donate each year) and if I put up another high gain yagi pointing northwestish I should be able to pull in CBC from Victoria to grab Doc Zone, but why bother? The few US show that I watch are streamed anyway so I'm just saving them bandwidth.

I've never bought and I will never buy a Snart TV. My current TV does have a RJ-45 if I care to hook it up to the network, but I have never used that port ONCE in the 2½yrs I have owned the TV. Nor does it have a mic and camera in it. However, if they become like the Snart phone then I will be forced to buy one as the 'dumb' ones will be fewer and fewer. If so, I will just open it up and physically cut out the camera and mic. Problem solved. Of course, I do believe there will be manufacturers out there that will still make TVs without a camera and mic for many years to come. Probably even long after I am gone.

I bought a LCD projector, and high-end computer speakers, years ago when I was on a ship. Everyone else on board bought nice LCD screens, and the moment we hit heavy weather, I could hear all those nice LCD screens falling all over the place.

My projector was strapped down, and never moved. By using a bed sheet, I had the largest "TV" of anyone on the ship. All with the footprint of two boxes of Ritz crackers.

It migrated with me to my current home, and it works perfectly against the wall, again, giving me