It looks suspiciously like the listed donors were unaware
of the ‘donations’.

Now how on earth could that be?
And how could the party bosses not know of the source of such a large
‘donation’, especially when their accounts are in nearly as
bad a mess as those of Northern Crock and the country at large?

From the first link below:

“Paying back the money will do nothing to help Labour’s
troubled finances: the party faces debts of more than £20 million,
including £14 million in outstanding loans.”

As usual, the socialist Labour Party cannot be trusted
with money at any level.

“[...] Janet Dunn denied knowledge of the £25,000 donation
in her name and said that she had not knowingly written a cheque to
the party.” [Quoted from timesonline.co.uk]

“Asked about the donations in his name totalling £196,000,
he said: "You obviously know that with me coming from a council
house, there's no way that's possible. You're barking up the wrong tree."

“Neither he nor Mrs Kidd were interested in politics and neither
could afford to donate vast sums, he said, adding: "I've got my
mortgage to pay. I've never voted in my life. I can't stand Labour.
I can't stand any politicians." ” [Quoted from dailymail.co.uk]

the continuing disaster in iraq - for the enemy at least-
the auroran sunset

You may have wondered why you don’t hear much
in the fossil media about Iraq any more. The reason is simple - they have
very little ‘good news’ to report. Always remember that they aren’t against
the war, they are on the other side.

Here is some of the inconvenient news that you will likely have missed:

“The drop began in September, as civilian deaths (884) fell
52 percent from August and 77 percent year-over-year, while military
deaths (65) fell 23 percent and 10 percent over the same periods. October’s
declines made it a trend: Civilian deaths (758) dropped an additional
12 percent from the previous month and 38 percent year-over-year, while
US military deaths (38) dropped 42 percent and 64 percent during the
same periods.”
—
“ The formation of “Concerned Local Citizens” groups
(CLCs) – Iraqi neighborhood watches that augment the official
Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) – as a backlash against al Qaeda and
other extremists has been a pivotal grassroots development. The CLCs
vary by region, but they are largely composed of tribesmen and former
nationalist insurgents. Engaging the traditional tribal structures and
coercing insurgent groups to lay down their weapons or turn them on
Sunni and Shia extremists have been key counterinsurgency successes
that have contributed to the national drop in violence.

“ “The Sunni Awakening in Anbar is where it started, and
now it’s grown to 11 of the [18] provinces … encompass[ing]
also Shia and Sunni-Shia mixed villages,” said Bacon. “[There
are] over 200 initiatives of … ‘Concerned Local Citizens’
… [and] we’re looking at about over 67,000 volunteers now.
And what this has enabled us to do is, we go in and liberate an area
from al Qaeda and, if we move out of there, they’re holding.”

“ “It’s making neighborhoods untenable for [insurgents]
who used to strike at us. It’s whole communities sensing empowerment,”
said Stanton. “[Iraqi civilians think] ‘We can do things
now. Our children can play now.’ Normality is returning to the
neighborhood. It’s a good deal for them. And it all folds together
[with reconciliation] in communities that are mixed [Shia and Sunni],
as a lot of people are working together. It’s not complete –
there is still a lot of sectarian distrust – but there is a lot
of [cooperation] out there in the border regions, which is a hopeful
sign.” ” [Quoted from longwarjournal.org]

Compare to Russia, which is still has a much better
educated population, richer history and three times a long to get over
their own experiences of mass-murdering socialists - yet it is Russia that
is regressing, and Iraq that continues to improve.

a concise history of recent british politics, focusing on conservative leadership

A connecting link between several of the fools who put
the Conservative Party out of power so long wasthe
Cambridge mafia, made up of Norman Fowler,
Michael Howard, John Gummer, Kenneth Clarke, Leon Brittan, David Frost,
and Norman Lamont.

Social dynamic theory inclines to the view that it
only takes about six people to take over any organisation. The Cambridge
Mafia have not shown any great concern for Britain, merely for personal
advancement. The best of them was Lamont, so he was ‘sacrificed’.

John Major was brighter than any of those, but uneducated
and, thus, manipulable.

Another, though short-lived, Conservative leader was
Ian Duncan Smith - IDS. IDS is a far better man that any of them. Only
IDS and David Cameron received similar responses at Conference from the
now renascent party.

It was loyalty to the Socialist coup instead of the
party, a coup woven in good part by the Cambridge Mafia, that put Tony
Bliar in Number Ten.

John Major followed on from Margaret Thatcher’s
recovery of the British economy and nation. Unfortunately, he was shallow.
He ran government debt back up, and ran down reserves. He spent those,
oil money, privatisation receipts and other bleeding on the dole.

Major’s objective was clearly to leave Labour
a scorched earth, in the expectation they would screw up the economy as
usual. He left with ‘promises’ I have not the slightest doubt
that he had no intention of carrying out. This gave Bliar and Brown the
Clown the golden opportunity to squeeze the economy for two or three years. They both
offered and actually followed Major’s ‘promises’.

The Socialist Labour Party learned a new trick, after
decades of the false belief that all that was needed was for the British
people to understand socialism to sweep them to power. They finally realised that the British
would never knowingly vote for Socialism. So Bliar and the Clown acted
like any abusive would-be spouse: first gaining some trust from the electorate,
and then becoming ever more controlling and violent.

The victory in 1992 was very near to inevitable, after large numbers
of marginal voters disenfranchised themselves in trying to escape the poll tax
- the ludicrous behaviour of Neil Kinnock at Sheffield sealed it.

Margaret Thatcher was a pragmatist, so of course she
changed as circumstances changed. She had a most ghastly mess to clean
up. Her main errors were not to tackle the middle class unions, and her
dreadful judgement of men. The 1992 election was one that Margaret Thatcher
could not have won, and that was why it was necessary to remove her.

The extra term served by Major did a great deal to
weaken socialism further. It was a great shame that Major lacked sufficient
complexity. Then there were the Socialist hacks to aggravate the situation.

Socialist Johnny delivered Socialist Labour success,
and the idiots around him have given Bliar a free ride for ten years because
they were committed to the same foolishness.

Major was told what was necessary. He thought he knew
better, so the Labour high command was told. They ‘promised’
that and got elected. Of course, they did not carry it out effectively
because

they are socialists
and therefore

they are inherently incompetent;

they are control freaks.

As the Tory Party had been suborned by Socialists,
the priority became to force the Party back to sanity. That is now well near
to completion.

As I have said for years, Bliar is easy meat. All it
needed is a serious Tory leader, and the removing of the disgraceful Socialist
coup that had captured the leadership of the party.

Now the Clown is sinking by the week. He is a weak,
incompetent, empty suit.

It only needed a real leader to bring him down.

IDS would have achieved a similar end last time, only
the execrable H***** managed another palace coup.
IDS was already in process of turning the party around when the old fools
and whiners in the party struck, probably in the hope they could ride
up on the coat tails of improving polls.

The fools and whiners started in again on Cameron,
but this time their waning strength was not sufficient.

Major has been an utter disaster for the country and
the Tory Party, very likely the greatest disaster to befall the Party
in a century. He was a good, kind, intelligent man without serious depth.
A man from a poor background, over influenced by the degrading dogmas
of Socialism, who over identified with his background.

Socialism always destroys the poor, the economy and
the vulnerable.

The Conservative Party was told that it would lose,
and why it would lose. It has been told what is needed to recover from
its errors. At last, there is another serious Tory leader putting real
Tory agendas into practice.

The Tory Party is a very wide coalition, but there
are fools and extremists on both wings. Realising Socialist
Johnny is a loser does not give me the slightest wish to have Norman Tebbit,
or the execrable H*****, leading the party in a country which practices
elective dictatorship.

It is the Tory Party which has failed every bit as
much as the Socialist Labour Party. But without a serious Tory Party,
Britain is lost. Some pale shadow of a party, controlled by barrow boys
like Tebbit and Heseltine and ‘led’ by a naïf like Socialist
Johnny, becomes just a pale pink Socialist Party and would as inevitably
destroy Britain as will the likes of Bliar and the Clown if not stopped.

“Context? No one from the West Midlands Police, the CPS or Green
Lane Mosque has yet given us the correct context for the notion that
women are born deficient, that homosexuals should be thrown off a mountain
or that young girls who refuse to wear the hijab should be hit.”

“Twenty years ago, a young black man walked into a pub in Bristol
and ordered a drink. Behind him, a gang of white youths started a chant:
"Nig nogs on the starboard bow, starboard bow" Straightforward,
everyday racism. Only this time, it was caught on camera and broadcast
on BBC1.

“Fast forward 20 years, and another young man walks into a mosque
in Birmingham, one apparently committed to interfaith dialogue. The
preacher, however, seems less than committed. "Christians and Jews
are enemies to Muslims," he says. What about a gay man? "Throw
him off the mountain." And women? "Allah created the women
deficient." Again, all caught on film, this time broadcast on Channel
4.

“Two clear cases of antisocial, illiberal behaviour. But here's
the difference. Twenty years ago, Avon and Somerset Police were full
of praise for our undercover exposé; at last, people could see
what they were up against, that racism wasn't the invention of an oversensitive
race relations industry. How naïve we were to imagine that such
a sensible reaction would follow the broadcast of Dispatches: Undercover
Mosque.”

“[...] teachers don't develop children's abilities to think and
talk [...]”
—
“ "The conclusions of the first three reports should make
those running education policy stop and think. They demonstrate that
the initial sharp rise in primary school test results between 1995 and
2000 is now understood to be largely a result of teaching to the tests,
and not to a dramatic improvement in learning. They point out that the
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and the government's own Statistics
Commission accepted the rises were overstated, only for the DCSF to
reject the findings. The review also finds that the primary curriculum
has narrowed in response to the testing; that statutory tests make it
harder, not easier, to judge pupils' progress; that there have been
rises in test-induced stress among pupils; that the results of the tests
are unreliable in up to a third of cases; and that the gap between the
highest and lowest achievers in Britain is wider than in many other
countries.

“The reports conclude there has been a genuine, although modest,
improvement in children's numeracy. It cannot say the same about literacy.
Some £500m has been spent so far on running the national literacy
hour. Yet the review concludes that standards of reading have been "more
or less static since the 1950s". The National Literacy Strategy
has had "a barely noticeable effect" on reading ability, yet
since it has been introduced there has been a substantial fall in children's
enjoyment of reading. Meanwhile the literacy levels of the poorest children
are further behind their peers than anywhere in Europe.”

“This paper was prepared for a Center for Strategic and International
Studies and Center for a New American Security task force on the potential
security implications of climate change. It appears in abridged and
revised form in the task force report, "The Age of Consequences:
The National Security and Foreign Policy Implications of Global Climate
Change" and as an article in The Washington Quarterly (Winter 2007
- 2008).”
—
“ Large-scale human migration due to resource scarcity, increased
frequency of extreme weather events, and other factors, particularly
in the developing countries in the earth’s low latitudinal band.

“Intensifying intra- and inter-state competition for food, water,
and other resources, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa.

“Increased frequency and severity of disease outbreaks.

“Heightened risk of state failure and regional conflagration.

“Significant shifts in the geostrategic roles of every major
fuel type. Increased U.S. border stress due to the severe effects of
climate change in parts of Mexico and the Caribbean.

“Increased uncertainty over how China’s political leadership
will respond to growing domestic and international pressure to become
a "responsible stakeholder" in the global environment.

“Strain on the capacity of the United States - and in particular
the U.S. military - to act as a "first responder" to international
disasters and humanitarian crises due to their increased frequency,
complexity, and danger.

“Growing demand for international institutions to play new and
expanded roles in the management of refugee crises and in providing
forums for the negotiation of climate agreements.”

I believe we can mitigate anthropogenic global warming
[AGW] and minimise energy depletion consequences, but the two situations
are intimately linked. These problems are highly political; one thing
the world is not short of is stupidity.

All polls suggest that
individuals will cling like limpets to their own interests and do as little
as possible to change their actions. They will even justify this by becoming
Flat Earthers, or AGW deniers if called upon.

“China and the U.S. will set up a military hotline, hold high-level
nuclear strategy talks and increase joint exercises, U.S. Defense Secretary
Robert Gates and his Chinese counterpart, General Cao Gangchuan, said.”

“The two men emphasized bilateral cooperation and communication,
but they also discussed the issue of Iran's nuclear ambitions.

“We agreed that it's important to pursue efforts to persuade
the Iranian government to change their behavior and their policies peacefully,
through diplomatic means," Gates said. They discussed continued
and increased economic pressure "as a way of persuading the Iranian
government to make different choices." ”