Hours after the court decision, presidential advisor Mohamed Gadalla told Reuters that the presidential decree by which Morsi called the elections was "sovereign" and could not be overturned by court order.

"According to the law, the verdict can be appealed," Abdel-Maqsoud told Al-Ahram's Arabic-language news website. "We're expecting it to be overturned."

Media consultant for the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party Mourad Ali, however, stated on Twitter that it was "unlikely" that his party would appeal the verdict. "We respect court rulings and don't have a problem with referring the law to the High Constitutional Court," he said.

On 18 February, the High Constitutional Court (HCC) rejected five articles of a new elections law that will govern Egypt's second post-revolution parliamentary polls. The law was then sent back to the Shura Council (the upper house of Egypt's parliament, currently endowed with legislative authority) for amendment.

The Shura Council partially amended the legislation, but without referring it back to the HCC for final approval.

According to Wednesday's Administrative Court ruling, the Shura Council should have referred the law back to the HCC before ratifying it so as to ensure the constitutionality of the recent amendments.

Reactions vary

Abdallah Badran, head of the Salafist Nour Party's parliamentary bloc, hailed Wednesday's court ruling, stressing that his party had earlier demanded such a move.

Badran reiterated his party's fears that elections would take place without full HCC approval of the law governing them, thus exposing the incoming parliament to potential dissolution by court order – as was the fate of Egypt's first post-revolution parliament.

"The Nour Party is willing to discuss the law again in the Shura Council, look into the articles the HCC wants amended and refer them back to the HCC for final approval so as to avoid seeing parliament dissolved as it was last year," said Badran.

Egypt's last People's Assembly (the lower house of parliament) was dissolved last summer by the then-ruling military council following an HCC verdict deeming the law that regulated it unconstitutional.

Bahaa Abu-Shaqa, a prominent lawyer and member of the liberal Wafd Party, similarly defended Wednesday's court verdict. He argued that the president's decree calling for the polls was not sovereign as claimed, but simply represented an administrative decision.

"The court has the right to suspend the presidential decree if it finds it to be flawed," he said. "I urge everyone to respect court verdicts and only appeal them through legal channels."

Former Administrative Court head Mohamed El-Gamal likewise defended the verdict, which, he said, followed the Shura Council's failure to abide by the HCC's demand to amend certain articles of the elections law.

"The Shura Council only made superficial changes [to the electoral law] and the constitutionality of those amendments was never confirmed," he said. "The Administrative Court ruled to refer the law to the HCC to allow the latter to perform its role of establishing the constitutionality of elections-related legislation."

He added that the court decision "does not overstep sovereign presidential decisions, as elections-related decrees aren't considered sovereign."

Based on the ruling, according to El-Gamal, Egypt's Supreme Elections Commission (mandated with organising the polls) "should suspend its work" until a final decision is issued by the Administrative Court following the expected appeal.

Several members of the opposition National Salvation Front (NSF) umbrella group, meanwhile, which had earlier declared its intention to boycott the polls on legal grounds, saw the verdict as a vindication of their position. NSF members, however, appeared to disagree as to whether or not the verdict would mean a change in the NSF's official stance on elections.

One member of the liberal Free Egyptians Party, a sub-grouping within the NSF, saw the verdict merely as a justification of the NSF's boycott calls. Other NSF leaders, however, including Conference Party chief Amr Mousa and leading Tagammu Party member Rifaat El-Said, saw the verdict as a step towards meeting the NSF's conditions for participating in the upcoming polls, Al-Ahram's Arabic-language news website reported.

Hopes for consensus

Wafd Party member Abdallah Moghazy, for his part, told the same website that the court verdict could serve to jumpstart serious dialogue between the presidency and opposition aimed at breaking the political deadlock.

"The presidency was using the 'lack of time' as an excuse not to replace the current government with a new one [a primary demand of the NSF]," said Moghazy. "But now, with the court verdict, it has all the time it needs; it has no excuse. A change of government could prompt opposition parties to reconsider taking part in elections."

The opposition had demanded certain guarantees that polls would be fair and transparent, including the formation of a national unity government and the dismissal of Egypt's Morsi-appointed prosecutor-general. Some opposition parties have also expressed reservations about the new elections law, which, they assert, only benefits the majority party.

The presidency, for its part, stressed via Twitter its "respect for the Administrative Court ruling to suspend elections for parliament's lower house and refer the elections law back to the constitutional court." It went on to reaffirm "its respect for [Egypt's] constitution, the rule of law and the separation of powers."

Ahram Online welcomes readers' comments on all issues covered by the site, along with any criticisms and/or corrections. Readers are asked to limit their feedback to a maximum of 1000 characters (roughly 50 words). All comments/criticisms will, however, be subject to the following code

We will not publish comments which contain rude or abusive language, libelous statements,
slander and personal attacks against any person/s.

We will not publish comments which contain racist remarks or any kind of racial
or religious incitement against any group of people, in Egypt or outside it.

We welcome criticism of our reports and articles but we will not publish personal
attacks, slander or fabrications directed against our reporters and contributing
writers.

We reserve the right to correct, when at all possible, obvious errors in spelling
and grammar. However, due to time and staffing constraints such corrections will
not be made across the board or on a regular basis.

Please Wait

4

abdulrahman

22-04-2013 02:43am

0-

0+

The Courts Prolongs The Agony Of Egypt

The Egyptian courts are delaying the political process. The political uncertainty will then provide Mubarak era with positive outlook. The longer it is without elections, the greater number of Egyptians will regret about the revolution. As such all anti revolutionary elements should be taken off positions of power before elections are held. Beware! Political party which wins in the coming elections will not be able to administer Egypt properly if such people are around, unless is run according to the wishes of these elements.

Email

Name

Comment's Title

Comment

Please Wait

3

mohammed moiduddin

08-03-2013 02:31am

0-

0+

Just can't we all get along?

The economy, the economy, the economy. Which needs stability and security. Lets have all parties represented in government with MB with majority. Same in cabinet and move on. In port said all the people to be executed should be in life sentences.

Email

Name

Comment's Title

Comment

Please Wait

2

Nora

07-03-2013 02:28am

0-

1+

Net effects

Having no parliament will lead to lengthen the period where MB governs alone. Not sure why the oppositions are cheering. whining can't be the only contribution.

Email

Name

Comment's Title

Comment

Please Wait

1

Almisry

07-03-2013 01:43am

0-

1+

Reconciliation

Well done Mr President Morsi as always respect the courts. NSF must always respect the law as well. Together we build Egypt through pallor box.