Thursday, September 13, 2012

Termination of reality.

In the most advanced countries, the
developed world, the 1st world countries the perception of
a dog is skewed. It is skewed due to the one simple fact and that is
that in those countries the rule of law has been kept with more or
less undisturbed continuity. Yes there were some disturbances but
they never left the mutually recognised consensus that dictates how
things ought to be done. Even world wars were, in that sense, fought
with that “agreement” in mind. This setting created in a sense, a
“controlled” environment that has only one base and that base is
mutually recognised common ground also known as THE CONSENSUS about
common good. You will find expressions of this setting trough out
the entire western world, in forms of various alliances, treaties,
the Commonwealth, the European Union, the United States, NATO, UN and
so on. I will not venture in the nature of those structures, yet I
will just state that those are simply STRUCTURES that reside on the
common interest or common good. This controlled setting is govern by
the rule of law and norms that are undisputed, recognised as positive
and beneficial for the common good. They are the general setting that
applies to all, and thus they define and/or control the events that
happen within that environment. Therefore all the relationships
between parties within that setting reside on that base.

Until now.

This agreement also defines and shapes
the relationship towards pets and in this case the pet dogs. Owner's
responsibilities were simple and straight forward. The dog was seen
as the useful animal that had its place within the society, and that
place was again defined by the role that was meant for it. It
belonged to the order. But there was one other even simpler fact that
is crucial for this story. Back than, there was simply LESS of them.
Since there was less of them, they were easier to control and to
define.

This controlled setting and the fairly
limited contact or presence of dogs within the society formed that
image of a dog as useful and later on good by default, animal.
However the real reality of the dog is something completely opposite
than this. It is neither good or useful by default, yet it is an
organism with some really nasty and dangerous treats, that can prove
devastating for the nature. However the controlled setting obscures
these treats and the current DOGmatics deny the very existence of
those treats. But in the uncontrolled and ungoverned setting those
treats are clearly noticeable and cannot be denied. So I will go
trough all of them.

The dog is not a natural organism,
there are no wild packs of Doberman or Pit bulls in the nature or in
any ecosystem. There is no sabretooth prehistoric Chihuahuas fossils.
The dog is an organism that is genetically engineered by humans,
trough selective breeding and as such it is intentional. It was done
with the purpose. The breeds came to pass not by natural selection
but by genetic manipulation. In other words, the dog is not an animal
although it is indisputably perceived as one. Wolf and the coyote are
animals, hyenas are animals but the dog isn't. Even the dingo, the
Australian wild dog is not the indigenous animal to the Australian
soil, yet it is the normal dog brought by the settlers and released
into the wild, where it became the wild dog.

But the cult of the dog, so well
established within the general consensus, demands that dog is
perceived as animal. This delusion goes so deep that even in the
scientific community all canine species are often clumped into the so
called “dog family”, and they count wolves,coyotes,hyenas
although these animals have nothing in common with the dog, except
similar morphology or looks.

All dogs share three main and well
known treats:

It is the carnivore although not
exclusive as feline family is.

It is the social organism, which
means that it has the tendency to form social order or packs. But
unlike wolves whom usually form packs during the winter dogs
constantly form packs.

It is the territorial organism,
which means that it is bounded to the physical space, the territory
or the hunting ground.

However, there is the fourth treat that
is deliberately hidden by the DOGmatics. The dog is, above anything
else, the BLOOD LUST organism.

There are very few organisms within the
ecosystem that have this characteristics. It is found mostly within
ferrets, weasels, tigers, dolphins and it is almost exclusive
characteristics of all canines.

Being a blood lust organism in essence
means, that this type of organism kills for thrills, it hunts down
its prey not only cause it is hungry or it is engaged in some form of
territorial dispute. It kills simply cause it likes to kill. Once it
gets the chance to kill it kills until it kills all, until it
exterminates completely that what it kills.

The dog cultist interpret this
characteristics as the dog's desire to fight, that it is built to
fight but that is not true. Also they tie this characteristics to
some type of dog's abuse or any other type of wrong upbringing by the
owner. This however is again, another smoke screen, introduced to
elevate the role of the dogcraver.

Other people often mistake the cats
behaviour when it brings animals that it hunted down to the owner
doorstep as the proof of its blood lust. The cat considers humans as
cats and it brings the prey as an example to its human owners that it
treats as kittens. It TEACHES them how it is done. Also cat needs to
practice so it often plays with its prey before it eats it. In some
cases, it doesn't eat the prey but that is because it has the more
secure source of food, aka the owner. In the wild, however, nothing
goes to waste and this behaviour doesn't exist.

Dog kills on the other hand have no
PURPOSE yet they are the pure mindless destruction of the
surroundings. This outburst of destruction is the consequence of
genetic manipulation done by humans. It is the error in the design
that is uncorrectable and it is uncorrectable cause it is the very
basis of the organism, it resides on it. It is its definition.
However, since it is so destructive it is the most suppressed and
denied characteristics by the dogcravers.

They like to make jokes about it, when
the dog chews up their shoes, when it wrecks property and they think
that it is cute, it goes without saying cause, OMG it is THE DOG.

The truth, however is much much darker. The dog is not the hunter it is the KILLER.

Total Pageviews

About Me

“One of the greatest mistakes, in my opinion, is to identify the pet movement with the ecological movement. The pet movement is an industry based commercial trend while the ecological movement is driven by the noble idea that goes beyond ourselves. The pet movement is equally destructive towards nature as the oil industry is yet it was able to hide its true nature behind pet animal. The pet animal is just another industrial product and has the connection with the nature as much as the oil tanker. It is my firm belief that the greatest danger for the ecological movement and nature itself, comes not from the heavy industries yet from the pet movement itself”.
Professor Hilder