Learned counsel submits that petitioner is a
charitable/religious organization, therefore, the respondent Haryana Urban
Development Authority ought to have applied the rates, which they have
notified vide Annexure P-6 for religious/charitable sites. To fortify this
submission, learned counsel has relied upon a communication (Annexure
P-3) issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Panchkula.

A perusal of communication (Annexure P-3) shows the
helplessness of the authorities to demolish and dispossess the religious
bodies like the petitioner. Therefore, out of necessity, land was allotted.
Letter of allotment was accepted by the petitioner and 25 per cent of the
Civil Writ Petition No. 17655 of 2009 2
amount was also paid. Having accepted the terms and conditions of the
allotment and by making first deposit in year 2003, petitioner, after six
years cannot approach this Court and say that the rates be revised,
especially when earlier writ petition making similar prayer was dismissed
as withdrawn from a Division Bench of this Court vide order (Annexure
P-14).

Hence, there is no merit in the present writ petition and the
same is dismissed.