Six years now and not one single fact to back up the hysterical media claims that began on May 4 2007 when Kate McCann, Gerry McCann, Michael Wright, Philomena McCann and Trish Cameron started lying systematically to the media. Not one.

The chief shillsMichael Wright lied on May 4 when he told the public that the parents had been "spun against" and he was defending them. They had not been "spun against" by anybody, as the public record proves. Gerry McCann, during the night of May 3/4 encouraged him to contact the media with the lies.

Trish Cameron lied on May 4 when she said that the parents had been stalked by an abductor during the week and that apartment 5A had been broken into by an abductor. She had been contacted by Gerry McCann on the night of May 3/4 and given the fairy story to publicise.

On May 6 Philomena McCann began deliberately lying about the police investigation to the media, claiming lack of response, inadequate searching,neglect and inefficiency. Not one word of these claims was true: they were lying inventions of Kate & Gerry McCann, passed on to Philomena specifically for outside broadcasting, despite the police pleas for silence.

These actions of the five people are not claims or my opinion: they are established, on the record, proven facts.The media fell for every one of the lies. The conspiracy to cover up and lie about the events of May 3 onwards was completely successful and the family shills, aided by the two principals feeding them what they wanted publicised, went onto radio and television further embroidering their baseless claims.

The end of the affairThe Madeleine McCann Affair was essentially over by May 10. The actual course of events and of the investigation had been completely drowned out by the lies which the media simply multiplied and amplified for the next twelve weeks until, in early August, some of the facts could no longer be denied. Until then the McCann family's stranglehold on UK media reporting, and hence knowledge of the truth of the investigation, had been maintained 100% with all of them insisting, day after day, that the police had no suspicions about the couple.

May 10. The day that Mr Bakhurst, head of BBC news 24, wrote his revolting paean to the lying family, having been completely taken in. He and his staff knew of the early and complete refutation of the lies about "the poor search effort" and the invented "intrusion evidence" by Mr Hill, eyewitness and Mark Warner manager, who quoted the refutation evidence publicly.

They chose to ignore or muffle it, as did the other media organizations.The BBC knew on May 10 of other versions of what was actually going on. We don't know where they came from or how truthful they were because the BBC deliberately chose to suppress them.

Why? Conspiracy? Corruption? Political pressure? Believe that if you like and go on feeding little lying Glasgow Gel's self-image as a power behind the scenes.

All of them suppressed, and still suppress, any inner doubts because of just about the oldest human weakness, after sex and apples, of all: the weakness that makes people go on trying harder and harder to buy London Bridge once someone has completely convinced them that it really is for sale. Given that initial conviction, as every conman knows, the punter is forever in too deep to get out. Shame, sheer embarrassment, unwillingness to believe in your own stupidity, pride. They were all comprehensively conned and they can never admit it, as Crimewatch will demonstrate yet again.

To complete the con Gerry and Kate McCann have time after time disguised the truth of what happened on the night of May 3/4, claiming repeatedly that media interest came as a "surprise" to them after they had returned from Portimao police HQ on the afternoon of May 4. The truth, again a matter of record, is that they initiated the media interest by the use of the "green light" later described by Kate McCann: the method of using third parties and co-conspirators to circulate lies to the public. Even giving evidence to the House of Commons Gerry McCann misled the committee under oath with exactly the same part of the "fairy tale".

By the afternoon of May 10 Gerry McCann knew that the police had made him, his wife who was "unavailable" for interview and the seven friends the prime suspects in the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann – he heard Oldfield crying hysterically in the police interview room as he was accused of being part of a faked abduction. Yet – read the blogs for August for an insight into a disgusting liar's methods—he went on hiding the truth from the British public.

I was glad when the media machine turned against the McCann's after they were made suspects you only need to search the keywords Madeleine McCann and its all there In another 6 years time the twins will be able to read all about it (online)and make up their own minds since they have probably been brainwashed by their parents

____________________For Paulo Sargento, the thesis that Gonçalo Amaral revealed at first hand to "SP" that the blanket could have been used in a funeral ceremony at the Luz chapel "is very interesting".

And he adds: "In reality, when the McCanns went to Oprah's Show, the blanket was mentioned. At a given moment, when Oprah tells Kate that she heard her mention a blanket several times, Kate argued that a mother who misses a child always wants to know if she is comfortable, if she is warm, and added, referring to Maddie, that sometimes she asked herself if the person who had taken her would cover her up with her little blanket (but the blanket was on the bed after Maddie, supposedly, disappeared!!!).

Why? Conspiracy? Corruption? Political pressure? Believe that if you like and go on feeding little lying Glasgow Gel's self-image as a power behind the scenes

But you have to admit surely that Gerry has exerted and continues to exert some sort of control over the whole affair. There IS a definite media/ establishment cover up for whatever reason. My own thinking for what it's worth is that it was an accidental death of a much loved child which happened in their neglectful evening absence. Fearful of their reputations and the accompanying good life they had to invent the abduction. I don't think they were part of the probable high level dubious goings on in the area but certainly had knowledge of them and I think he uses this knowledge as a threat. He always looks terrified to me in case his bluff is called and he's fed to the dogs. My ( very ) humble opinion only.

Six years now and not one single fact to back up the hysterical media claims that began on May 4 2007 when Kate McCann, Gerry McCann, Michael Wright, Philomena McCann and Trish Cameron started lying systematically to the media. Not one.

The chief shillsMichael Wright lied on May 4 when he told the public that the parents had been "spun against" and he was defending them. They had not been "spun against" by anybody, as the public record proves. Gerry McCann, during the night of May 3/4 encouraged him to contact the media with the lies.

Trish Cameron lied on May 4 when she said that the parents had been stalked by an abductor during the week and that apartment 5A had been broken into by an abductor. She had been contacted by Gerry McCann on the night of May 3/4 and given the fairy story to publicise.

On May 6 Philomena McCann began deliberately lying about the police investigation to the media, claiming lack of response, inadequate searching,neglect and inefficiency. Not one word of these claims was true: they were lying inventions of Kate & Gerry McCann, passed on to Philomena specifically for outside broadcasting, despite the police pleas for silence.

These actions of the five people are not claims or my opinion: they are established, on the record, proven facts.The media fell for every one of the lies. The conspiracy to cover up and lie about the events of May 3 onwards was completely successful and the family shills, aided by the two principals feeding them what they wanted publicised, went onto radio and television further embroidering their baseless claims.

The end of the affairThe Madeleine McCann Affair was essentially over by May 10. The actual course of events and of the investigation had been completely drowned out by the lies which the media simply multiplied and amplified for the next twelve weeks until, in early August, some of the facts could no longer be denied. Until then the McCann family's stranglehold on UK media reporting, and hence knowledge of the truth of the investigation, had been maintained 100% with all of them insisting, day after day, that the police had no suspicions about the couple.

May 10. The day that Mr Bakhurst, head of BBC news 24, wrote his revolting paean to the lying family, having been completely taken in. He and his staff knew of the early and complete refutation of the lies about "the poor search effort" and the invented "intrusion evidence" by Mr Hill, eyewitness and Mark Warner manager, who quoted the refutation evidence publicly.

They chose to ignore or muffle it, as did the other media organizations.The BBC knew on May 10 of other versions of what was actually going on. We don't know where they came from or how truthful they were because the BBC deliberately chose to suppress them.

Why? Conspiracy? Corruption? Political pressure? Believe that if you like and go on feeding little lying Glasgow Gel's self-image as a power behind the scenes.

All of them suppressed, and still suppress, any inner doubts because of just about the oldest human weakness, after sex and apples, of all: the weakness that makes people go on trying harder and harder to buy London Bridge once someone has completely convinced them that it really is for sale. Given that initial conviction, as every conman knows, the punter is forever in too deep to get out. Shame, sheer embarrassment, unwillingness to believe in your own stupidity, pride. They were all comprehensively conned and they can never admit it, as Crimewatch will demonstrate yet again.

To complete the con Gerry and Kate McCann have time after time disguised the truth of what happened on the night of May 3/4, claiming repeatedly that media interest came as a "surprise" to them after they had returned from Portimao police HQ on the afternoon of May 4. The truth, again a matter of record, is that they initiated the media interest by the use of the "green light" later described by Kate McCann: the method of using third parties and co-conspirators to circulate lies to the public. Even giving evidence to the House of Commons Gerry McCann misled the committee under oath with exactly the same part of the "fairy tale".

By the afternoon of May 10 Gerry McCann knew that the police had made him, his wife who was "unavailable" for interview and the seven friends the prime suspects in the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann – he heard Oldfield crying hysterically in the police interview room as he was accused of being part of a faked abduction. Yet – read the blogs for August for an insight into a disgusting liar's methods—he went on hiding the truth from the British public.

Yep. The key is not something the McCanns have on all the others, they are absolute nincumpoops, the key is that no one ever wants to admit they were stupid.

____________________"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry

This article appeared, very briefly, in the UK Daily Express in September 2007. It was very quickly removed, and all traces of it erased from the DE Website. Forunately, a saved copy has since been discovered.Just why is this article so "dangerous"?

’MCCANNS ARE LYING’24th SeptemberMadeleine McCannMonday September 24,2007By David Pilditch and Martin Evans in Praia da Luz

Portuguese police believe Gerry and Kate McCann are using friends to hide their role in killing Madeleine.The Daily Express can reveal that their seven holiday friends may now be named as suspects as police believe they are hiding the truth about Madeleine’s death.The dramatic move comes as it was reported that former chief suspect Robert Murat is to be told he will not face charges over the four-year-old’s disappearance. Ruling him out of the four-month investigation will leave Kate and Gerry McCann as the sole suspects.Last night police sources said the decision could have a devastating impact on the McCanns’ defence. In an astonishing twist, British expat Murat could be used as a key prosecution witness against the McCanns. Almost the entire police case against Murat was built on evidence from the couple’s holiday friends.Investigators believe the McCanns “cooked up a story” that Madeleine had been kidnapped to throw them off the trail and enlisted members of their party to provide them with an alibi. They also believe the group tried to turn the focus of the investigation towards Murat.Yesterday it was revealed that police are questioning new witnesses who cast doubts over the evidence of members of the holiday group.The McCanns and their friends told how they took turns to check on their children every 30 minutes as they ate at a tapas restaurant on May 3, the night Madeleine vanished.But one Portuguese newspaper reported that employees at the restaurant insisted that only Dr Russell O’Brien, 36, and hospital consultant Matthew Oldfield, 37, left the dinner table that evening. Another witness has come forward to refute the testimony of a third friend Jane Tanner, 36, who told police she saw a man carrying a child rushing from the Ocean Club complex at around 9.15pm on May 3.Yesterday it was reported in Portugal that a new witness, an unnamed Irishman, told police he was in the same spot as Miss Tanner at the same time and saw no one. He is the second independent witness to dispute her story and police sources said they viewed Miss Tanner’s evidence as “unreliable” because of inconsistencies. Officers are concerned that she apparently changed her version of the sighting.She originally claimed she saw the suspect rushing towards the Baptista supermarket in Praia da Luz. She told police the child was wrapped in a blanket. A second independent witness reported seeing a similar man with a child in a blanket near the town’s church heading towards the beach. The route he took matches the alleged trail of death discovered by British sniffer dogs who detected the scent of a corpse. But Miss Tanner has now told detectives that the man was heading in a different direction – towards Murat’s home. Police regard her account as one of a series given by the McCanns and their friends to convince them that Madeleine had been kidnapped.Officers believe former hospital anaesthetist Kate, 39, killed her daughter by accidentally giving her an overdose of sleeping pills. They are working on the theory that consultant cardiologist Gerry, also 39, helped to dispose of Madeleine’s body. Police are awaiting results of toxicology tests carried out on bodily fluids with an 88 per cent match to Madeleine’s DNA found in the boot of a hire car the couple rented 25 days after she went missing.Dr O’Brien, along with Mr Oldfield’s wife Rachael, 36, and another friend Dr Fiona Payne, 34, said they saw Murat near the McCanns’ apartment on May 3 and their claim appeared to shatter Murat’s alibi.Detectives interrogated the McCanns at police headquarters in Portimao 17 days ago over the discrepancies. The couple were told separately later that day they were being named as suspects or arguidos.Last night another member of the McCanns’ holiday party was reported to have stepped into the mystery. The move came after it was revealed that police in Portugal were focusing their investigation on a “lost seven hours” on the day Madeleine disappeared.Now Dr Payne’s husband – medical researcher David, 41 – has claimed he saw Madeleine being put to bed when he visited the McCann flat at 7pm. Before his new testimony, police sources admitted they could not confirm the whereabouts of Kate and Madeleine after 1.29pm that day. Kate’s movements were said to be unaccounted for until she sat down to have dinner with Gerry and their friends at around 8.40pm.But the McCanns believe Mr Payne’s testimony will be crucial in proving their innocence. That would leave just an hour and a half in which they were supposed to have killed their daughter and disposed of her body. But last night a source in Portugal said police were viewing alibis provided by the McCanns’ friends with suspicion. They are convinced that some or all of them may have known what happened to Madeleine and may have helped to cover up her death. The source said police had not ruled out the possibility of naming them all as suspects – and they could face being charged as accessories.The source said: “It has long been considered a number of people may have been involved in this unfortunate case.”In Portugal yesterday it was revealed that detectives have seized a British police manual from the McCanns.Officers believe the book could be used as a key piece of evidence in building a case against them.A Portuguese police source said: “It is certainly not the sort of reading material you would expect a couple to take on a relaxing family holiday".

Long sniffing nonsense about, yer know, putting hands on their twins chests to check whether they were EVEN BREATHING . . (unspeakable professional negligence from a qualified Anaesthetist , but we have done that already.)But then listen carefully to04:29my best transcription is" obviously with what what happened to Madeleine, I did consider had perhaps she been given something TOO, some sedative to keep her quiet so she could be removed easily . . ."

perhaps she been given something TOO, some sedative to keep her quiet

In the police world it is called a "straight cough" She is admitting that the twins had been sedated. And is preparing the scene for Madleine to be found with fatal amounts of sedative - possibly a mistake - each parent giving a dose, without the other knowing . . .She is providing the PROOF of the sedation by describing the scene in such detail - which she does not need to, of course, but her brain is leaking.

Yep. The key is not something the McCanns have on all the others, they are absolute nincumpoops, the key is that no one ever wants to admit they were stupid

IF only it was that simple. We know a child is dead. We know the parents were criminally negligent and we know they're lying through their teeth. It should be an open and shut case . Let's face it they're nowhere near the simpletons that you say they are. They're managing to hold the story together despite the many give aways and no one on has yet come anywhere near convincing me that they have the answers to this mystery despite numerous intelligent efforts on here and other dedicated sites. If there was a will to prosecute this pair, it would have been done by now. So, why hasn't it?

You've probably already done this to death ( no pun intended ) but ifan overdose of sedative was the reason for death how do you account for the dogs reacting to the scent of blood between the wall and sofa ( a strange place ) ?

@kaz wrote:You've probably already done this to death ( no pun intended ) but ifan overdose of sedative was the reason for death how do you account for the dogs reacting to the scent of blood between the wall and sofa ( a strange place ) ?

GA said Madeleine likely climbed on the back of the sofa to look out of the window and fell down on to the tiled floor.

@kaz wrote:You've probably already done this to death ( no pun intended ) but ifan overdose of sedative was the reason for death how do you account for the dogs reacting to the scent of blood between the wall and sofa ( a strange place ) ?

Not that night.*-Wednesday night 2nd, sedated, staggers about, falls off sofa looking out of window for parents,Parents come home separately, don't bother to check, sleep in separate rooms, (see book )find Madeline the following morning, stiff and cold and leaking.PANICThey now have small cold stiff corpse with sedatives in system. They dare not allow a PM.Make ONE silly decision - and their world collapses.

Yep. The key is not something the McCanns have on all the others, they are absolute nincumpoops, the key is that no one ever wants to admit they were stupid

IF only it was that simple. We know a child is dead. We know the parents were criminally negligent and we know they're lying through their teeth. It should be an open and shut case . Let's face it they're nowhere near the simpletons that you say they are. They're managing to hold the story together despite the many give aways and no one on has yet come anywhere near convincing me that they have the answers to this mystery despite numerous intelligent efforts on here and other dedicated sites. If there was a will to prosecute this pair, it would have been done by now. So, why hasn't it?

As I said: a lot of important people don't want to look stupid. If you have ever worked with politicians then you would know: they can be caught with their pants down, they can be caught with their hand in the cookie jar, but it is deadly to be caught stupid.

The parents have had the luck they were surrounded by a lot of well willing powerful people. By the time they caught on it was too late. Every step the parents themselves took was not very smart. As a matter of fact this forum is full of stupid "misspeak" of them. Yes they are simpletons. There is not a big secret they know.

____________________"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry

@kaz wrote:You've probably already done this to death ( no pun intended ) but ifan overdose of sedative was the reason for death how do you account for the dogs reacting to the scent of blood between the wall and sofa ( a strange place ) ?

Not that night.*-Wednesday night 2nd, sedated, staggers about, falls off sofa looking out of window for parents,Parents come home separately, don't bother to check, sleep in separate rooms, (see book )find Madeline the following morning, stiff and cold and leaking.PANICThey now have small cold stiff corpse with sedatives in system. They dare not allow a PM.Make ONE silly decision - and their world collapses.

This is exactly the theory I expounded on a similar site to this and it was immediately 'whooshed.' The Tuesday night quiz aerobic teacher diversion seemed to play a big part in the bad feelings between the McCanns leading up to Wednesday night as did the 'Oh she's not that bad Gerry ' comment from Payne ( I think ) But the howls of derision pointed out that Cat Baker and Fiona ( who would NEVER lie of course ) had actually seen Madeleine on the 3rd and that the creche records attested to her attendance. My comments that Cat seemed a very confused nanny anyway were again quickly whooshed. There would have been no mad rush for the cleaning up operation in the case of a 2nd/3rd death either. Time for disposal and story alignment. ......................................IMO could be where the Scenic became contaminated . It's the crèche records and the car hire records that need close scrutiny.

That sounds pretty good thinking to me, PeterMac. Yes, car hire could be the secret well covered up so few people had to be in the loop already. Thank you for the work you have quietly attended to on here. joyce1938

This article appeared, very briefly, in the UK Daily Express in September 2007. It was very quickly removed, and all traces of it erased from the DE Website. Forunately, a saved copy has since been discovered.Just why is this article so "dangerous"?

More to the point, who had the muscle and wherewithal to get it removed? And why?Either it's libellous in which case its removal is understandable or it's too near the truth and someone with connections was able to 'whoosh' it. Who?

Eddie and Keela alerted to items and places concerned with the McCanns - and importantly to no other items or places.

According to Eddie and Keela, the body of Madeleine McCann lay lifeless behind the sofa in Apartment 5a, clinging to the only thing from which she could derive any comfort; a soft toy called 'Cuddle cat'.

Kate's book 'madeleine', Page 219: "Did they really believe that a dog could smell the 'odour of death' three months later from a body that had been so swiftly removed?"

After forensic analysis of the 'Last Photo' there is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on the Thursday 3rd May, but most likely on the Sunday 29th April. So, where was Madeleine at lunchtime on Thursday?

John McCann:"This was terrible for them, Kate dressed Amelie in her sister's pyjamas and the baby said: "Maddy's jammies, where is Maddy?"Martin Roberts:"If Madeleine's pyjamas had not, in fact, been abducted then neither had Madeleine McCann."Dr Martin Roberts: A Nightwear Job

Death Toll in McCann Case

Gerry McCann called for an example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014 after a 'Dossier' was handed in to Police by McCann supporters. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room the next day. Brenda paid the price.

Colin Shalke died suddenly in mysterious circumstances with a significant amount of morphine in his system. At the Inquest the coroner said there was no evidence as to how he had come to take morphine, and no needle mark was found.

Ex-Met DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC1's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window' of opportunity' from 3 mins to 45 mins, in accordance with their remit, to allow the staged abduction to happen.

Dr Gonçalo Amaral, retired PJ Coordinator: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened, they don't need to investigate anything. When MI5 opens their files, then we will know the truth."

Tracey Kandohla: "A McCann pal told The Sun Online: "Some of the savings have been siphoned off from the Find Maddie Fund into a fixed asset account, which financial experts have advised them to do. It can be used for purchases like buying a house or building equipment."

The McCanns, Operation Grange and the BBC are all working towards one goal - to make us keep looking at what happened (or didn't happen) on 3rd May, instead of looking at what happened days earlier. There is NO evidence of an abduction. Smithman is ALL they have got. Without that, they are sunk. No wonder Operation Grange clings on to Smithman...