NOW LETS NOT TALK ABOUT THE ABOVE, BUT LETS START WORLD WAR III OVER A ZOG [ZIONIST OCCUPIED GOVERNMENT] MANUFACTURED FALSE FLAG THAT EVERYONE KNOWS IS A MANUFACTURED FU$#ING FALSE FLAG! THE IDIOTS APPARENTLY ARE TOTALLY INSANE AND DRIVING THE BUS AGAIN! THEY CAN NOT BE TRUSTED WITH MATCHES LET ALONE BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL WEAPONS THAT THEY THINK WE DO NOT KNOW ABOUT!

What about these Chemicals Mr. President? Chemtrails are being sprayed on America, England, all NATO Nations 24-7-365!

WTF are we doing about this crime against humanity?

Comment by IDP: So the barking mad, satanic, Rothschilds Crypto Jew directed NWO continues with their lies. They invent the lie that Carbon Dioxide, a plant food is responsible for Global Warming and then DUMP POSION in to the environment sequestered from Coal Fired Power stations at Nano scale particulate so that it passes directly through our skin to the blood - through the blood - brain barrier to the brain causing the explosion in diseases like dementia that we have seen in the last twenty years. Often these aerosol sprayed poisons come with added bio-weapon agents and chemicals which is in fact GENOCIDING Humanity and Omniciding the planet!

Now the military Industrial complex have stated that by 2025 there will be less than 50,000,000 Americans alive in North America... how will they manage that???

Do you think perhaps its time to wake up the American people and have them get serious about their future:

We have included several documents here to help you do your research on this important topic:

In the IPCC´s AR5 Report on SPM 21, the following is stated: “Limited evidence precludes a comprehensive quantitative assessment of both Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and their impact on the climate system.If SRM were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing. CDR and SRM methods carry side effects and long-term consequences on a global scale”.

Former CIA boss, John Brennan, openly explains chemtrails/geoengineering against global warming while meaning its use for military purposes.

The CNN 14 Dec. 2016: On Tuesday, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) released its 11th annual Arctic Report Card, which compiles data from 61 scientists in 11 countries.

“Rarely have we seen the Arctic show a clearer, stronger or more pronounced signal of persistent warming and its cascading effects on the environment than this year,” Jeremy Mathis, director of NOAA’s Arctic Research Program, said in a statement.A few days ago Denmark´s state TV also brought this alarmist “news”.

The global warming combating plan was passed in Paris Dec. 2015 – not to fight a non-existing CO2-warming on our way out of a Little Ice Age, which ended about 1860: About 0.8 Centigrades increase over the past 150 years – when we look away from the natural El Nino last year.

Especially, the alarmists are worrying about the Arctic temperatures. In order to build their NWO scaremongering they never look further back than the past few decades.

Now the warmist propaganda alarmists run amok: The Guardian 1 May 2016 wrote: “Arctic ice melt could trigger uncontrollable climate change at global level”. (Note the eternal “could”: It is always this scaremongering guesswork because they have no facts – and the theory they build on (man-made CO2-warming) is false).

Professor of applied physics David Keith of Harvard describes Chemtrails andhereandhere.MIT Technology Review 8 Febr. 2013: Here is the plan (to fight “global warming”). Customize several Gulfstream business jets with military engines and with equipment to produce and disperse fine droplets of sulfuric acid. Fly the jets up around 20 kilometers—significantly higher than the cruising altitude for a commercial jetliner but still well within their range. At that altitude in the tropics, the aircraft are in the lower stratosphere. The planes spray the sulfuric acid, carefully controlling the rate of its release. The sulfur combines with water vapor to form sulfate aerosols, fine particles less than a micrometer in diameter. These get swept upward by natural wind patterns and are dispersed over the globe, including the poles. Once spread across the stratosphere, the aerosols will reflect about 1 percent of the sunlight hitting Earth back into space. Increasing what scientists call the planet’s albedo, or reflective power, will partially offset the warming effects caused by rising levels of greenhouse gases.

Comment: 1) Dishonestly, the professor makes this a theoretical option – well knowing that this atmosphere pollution has been practiced since the 1990es. 2) He knows that the Michael Mann hockey stick and so the man made CO2-warming is the biggest lie in history – as revealed by the Climategate scandal.

The chemtrails form cirrhus clouds – and as Dane Wigington writes on 21 Febr. 2017: Of all the threats we face, the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare assault is the single greatest short of nuclear cataclysm.

Effect of cirrhus clouds: 1. High altitude ice crystal clouds (chemtrails) reflect less energy, but trap more heat emitted from the surface of the earth. High, thin hazy clouds that are created by aircraft chemtrails are warming the planet!

So these “scientists” think that by blocking the irradiation of sunlight, they can cool our normal globe (for the benefit of the chemtrail industry and to the detriment of mankind)!The sun irradiation obstruction does not outweigh the obstruction of global heat to space.

Critics of Solar Radiation Management (chemtrails) —and even its advocates—note that the technology has numerous limitations,and that no one is entirely sure what the consequences would be. Sulfate aerosols reflect sunlight in the upper atmosphere, thus directly cooling the planet. But greenhouse gases operate very differently, trapping long-wave infrared radiation escaping from Earth’s surface and thus warming it.

The term ‘solar radiation management’ is positively Orwellian,” says ­Raymond Pierre­humbert, a geophysicist at the University of Chicago. “It’s a way to increase comfort levels with this crazy idea. We don’t really know what it is going to do.” In delivering the prestigious Tyndall Lecture at the annual American Geophysical Union meeting last December, he said the idea of putting sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere was “barking mad.”

US` EPA: Short-term exposures to SO2 can harm the human respiratory system and make breathing difficult.Children, the elderly, and those who suffer from asthma are particularly sensitive to effects of SO2.At high concentrations, gaseous SOx can harm trees and plants by damaging foliage and decreasing growth (acid rain).

Damages by ongoing Chemtrailing/GeoengineeringGeoengineering Watch 13 may 2014: According to agencies like WHO, (World Heath Organizatin) and a long list of other recognized government sources of UV information like NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), no more than 5% of the total UV reaching the surface of Earth should be UVB. The other 95% should be UVA.

These agencies go on to state that UVC should be ZERO.

What has our testing shown?

UVB – the most lethal form of UV radiation – has now escalated to almost 70% of the total UV reaching the surface of our planet – due to chemtrailing.

The polesThere has beenan outcry over melting Greenland ice at the Jakobshavn glacier. Danish Masonic Illuminati stooge politicians regularly take world leaders there in regular climate tourism to show the terrible consequences of global “warming”: Green land´s ice masses are the 2. largest mass of ice-bound water after the Antarctis. If it melts, sea level would rise by 6 meters.

Below is the truth, however (Climate4You). An overview to get things into perspective: There have been much warmer periods due to natural causes in the Arctic (Greenland) over the past 11.000 years

The Daily Mail finds that the inner inland ice of Greenland is growing thicker and moves even more slowly than 9.000 years ago!!

The warmists keep telling us that the Arctic ice is melting disastrously. I cannot see any change over the 9 year-period from 2007 to 2016. Unfortunately, Cryosphere Today has stopped its daily reports on satellite photos of that ice. WHY?? Because the facts are inconvenient to the NWO-ideologists?

The following graph from Prof. Humlum´s Climate4You tells there is no global warming og the Arctic.

And the Chief of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri had declared in the Times of India on 3 Sept. 2010: I am happy that the truth (about Climategates) has come out!!! If that was not the case, then we would be like any other scientific body that maybe producing first-rate reports but don’t see the light of the day because they don’t matter in policy-making. Now clearly, if it’s an inter-governmental body and we want governments’ ownership of what we produce, obviously they will give us guidance of what direction to follow, what are the questions they want answered. Unfortunately, people have completely missed the original resolution by which IPCC was set up. It clearly says that our assessment should include realistic response strategies. If that is not an assessment of policies, then what does it represent?

Climate fraudsters. They not only knew the “climate science” was fraud – they commanded the IPCC and its cooperators to present “CO2 man made global warming” – later changing the name to “climate change” as they saw there was no global warming.Nevertheless, these NWO puppets undoubtedly do make global climate change: Through their poisonous and here — Chemtrails (see SPM 21 des IPCC-Berichts AR5: Solar radiation management).

Here comes what should be the lethal bomb under the global warming scam (but probably not will be, because it is the most important instrument of the mendacious globalists towards one-world governance.)

The Daily Mail 4 Febr. 2017: A high-level whistleblower, John Bates, has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

1998, 2015/2016 are el Nino-years (well-known warming from Pacific ocean water currents – has nothing to do with climate)

A final, approved version has still not been issued. None of the data on which the paper was based was properly ‘archived’ – a mandatory requirement meant to ensure that raw data and the software used to process it is accessible to other scientists, so they can verify NOAA results.

Whistleblower Dr John Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards ‘to produce and preserve climate data records’.Yet when it came to the paper timed to influence the Paris conference, Dr Bates said, the NOAA standards were flagrantly ignored.Thanks to today’s MoS story, NOAA is set to face an inquiry by the Republican-led House science committee.

However, the Pausebuster paper said while the rate of global warming from 1950 to 1999 was 0.113C per decade, the rate from 2000 to 2014 was actually higher, at 0.116C per decade. The IPCC’s claim about the pause, it concluded, ‘was no longer valid’.The impact was huge and lasting. On publication day, the BBC said the pause in global warming was ‘an illusioncaused by inaccurate data’.

A: The sea dataset used by Thomas Karland his colleagues – known as Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperatures version 4, or ERSSTv4, tripled the warming trend over the sea during the years 2000 to 2014 from just 0.036C per decade – as stated in version 3 – to 0.099C per decade.

B: Dr Bates saidthe sea temperature increase was achieved by dubious means. Its key error was an upwards ‘adjustment’ of readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more doubtful source – water taken in by ships. This, Dr Bates explained, has long been known to be questionable: ships are themselves sources of heat, readings will vary from ship to ship, and the depth of water intake will vary according to how heavily a ship is laden – so affecting temperature readings.

Dr Bates said: ‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. It also ignored data from satellites that measure the temperature of the lower atmosphere, which are also considered reliable. Dr Bates said he gave the paper’s co-authors ‘a hard time’ about this, ‘and they never really justified what they were doing.’

C: The second dataset used by the Pausebuster paper was a new version of NOAA’s land records, known as the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) – an analysis over time of temperature readings from about 4,000 weather stationsspread across the globe.This new version found past temperatures had been cooler than previously thought, and recent ones higher – so that the warming trend looked steeper. For the period 2000 to 2014, the paper increased the rate of warming on land from 0.15C to 0.164C per decade.

D: In the weeks after the Pausebuster paper was published, Dr Bates conducted a one-man investigation into this. His findings were extraordinary. Mr Karl and his colleagues had failed to follow any of the formal procedures required to approve and archive their data.

E: Moreover, the GHCN software was afflicted by serious bugs. They caused it to become so ‘unstable’ that every time the raw temperature readings were run through the computer, it gave different results

F: Dr Bates said: ‘I learned that the computer used to process the software had suffered a complete failure.’ The reason for the failure is unknown, but it means the Pausebuster paper can never be replicated or verified by other scientists.

The flawed conclusions of the Pausebuster paper were widely discussed by delegates at the Paris climate change conference. Mr Karl had a longstanding relationship with President Obama’s chief science adviser, John Holdren, giving him a hotline to the White House.

G: NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims.NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.Last night Mr Smith thanked Dr Bates ‘for courageously stepping forwardto tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion’. He added: ‘The Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the President’s climate change agenda,and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study.’

Mr. Karl admitted that the final, approved and ‘operational’ edition of the GHCN land data would be ‘different’ from that used in the paper’.As for the ERSSTv4 sea dataset, he claimed it was other records – such as the UK Met Office’s – which were wrong. Jeremy Berg, Science’s editor-in-chief, said: ‘Dr Bates raises some serious concerns. After the results of any appropriate investigations… we will consider our options.’ He said that ‘could include retracting that paper’.NOAA declined to comment.