Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey

Transcription

1 Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey Characteristic Category Weighted Un- weighted Number % Number % Age 18 years old 4, years old 8, , years old 9, , years old 7, , years old 5, years old 2, years old 1, years or older 8, , Student Affiliation 36, , , , Year in school/program Freshman 7, , Sophomore 8, , Junior 9, , Senior 11, , Prof 1st year 3, Prof 2nd year 2, Prof 3rd year 1, Prof 4th year or higher 2, Year first enrolled in the college or university 2010 or earlier 5, , , , , , , , or , , Hispanic or Latino? Yes 2, No 44, ,

2 Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey (continued) Characteristic Category Weighted Un- weighted Number % Number % Race White only 33, , Black only 3, Asian only 7, Other/Multi race 2, Gender Identity Female 23, , Male 22, , Other Sexual Orientation Heterosexual 41, , Non- Heterosexual 4, Since enrolled in college or university, have you been in a partnered relationship? Yes 34, , No 11, , Did not answer the question Have a disability registered with the university? Yes 1, No 45, , Did not answer the question

3 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) If someone were to report sexual assault or sexual misconduct to an official, how likely is it that... Students would support the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely The alleged offender(s) or their associates would retaliate against the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take the report seriously. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

4 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) Campus officials would protect the safety of the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would conduct a fair investigation. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take action against the offender(s). Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual assault or sexual misconduct. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

5 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=76) (n=59) (n=17) % StdErr % StdErr If someone were to report sexual assault or sexual misconduct to an official, how likely is it that... Students would support the person making the report. Not at all s s A little s s Somewhat Very Extremely s s The alleged offender(s) or their associates would retaliate against the person making the report. Not at all s s s s A little Somewhat Very Extremely s s Campus officials would take the report seriously. Not at all A little Somewhat s s Very Extremely s s

6 Table 1.1. Perceptions of s to Reporting Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct to an Official by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=76) (n=59) (n=17) % StdErr % StdErr Campus official would protect the safety of the person making the report. Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely s s Campus officials would conduct a fair investigation. Not at all A little s s Somewhat Very Extremely s s s s Campus officials would take action against the offender(s). Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely s s s s Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual assault or sexual misconduct. Not at all A little Somewhat Very s s Extremely s s s s 1 Per 100 students. 2 TGQN = Transgender woman, Transgender man, Genderqueer, gender non- conforming, questioning, not listed.

7 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) Have you been in any of the following situations? (n=2,189) (n=814) If so, what did you do? Suspected a friend was sexually assaulted Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Spoke to my friend or someone else to seek help Took action in another way No Witnessed drunk person heading for sexual encounter Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Directly intervened to stop it Spoke to someone else to seek help Took action in another way No

8 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) Witnessed someone acting in sexually violent or harassing manner Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Directly intervened to stop it Spoke to someone else to seek help Took action in another way No

9 Table 1.2. Bystander Intervention Upon Witnessing Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 (continued) TGQN (n=76) (n=59) (n=17) % StdErr % StdErr Have you been in any of the following situations? If so, what did you do? Suspected a friend was sexually assaulted Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do s s s s Did nothing for another reason Spoke to my friend or someone else to seek help Took action in another way s s No Witnessed drunk person heading for sexual encounter Yes Did nothing because I wasn t sure what to do Did nothing for another reason Directly intervened to stop it s s - - Spoke to someone else to seek help Took action in another way s s No

11 Table 1.3. Perceptions Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1, 2 Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) Sexual assault or sexual misconduct a problem at university Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct on campus Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely Likelihood of experiencing sexual assault or sexual misconduct off campus at university- sponsored events Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely

14 Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 (continued) Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) Knowledgeable about how sexual assault and sexual misconduct defined at university Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely Knowledgeable about where to get help at university if student or friend experience sexual assault or sexual misconduct Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely Knowledgeable about where to make a report if student or friend experience sexual assault or sexual misconduct at university Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely

15 Table 2.1. Knowledge and Perceptions About Resources Related to Sexual Assault or Sexual Misconduct by Gender and Enrollment Status 1 (continued) Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) Knowledgeable about what happens when a student reports sexual assault or sexual misconduct at university Not at all A little bit Somewhat Very Extremely Initial university orientation included information about sexual assault or sexual misconduct Yes Not at all A little Somewhat Very Extremely No I didn't attend orientation I don't remember Per 100 students.

16 Table 3.1a. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation 2, , Penetration 1, , Physical force only , Completed Attempted Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching 2, , Physical force only 1, , Incapacitation only , Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

17 Table 3.1b. Percent of Graduate Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed Attempted s s s Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

18 Table 3.1c. Percent of Male Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed Attempted Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation s s s Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation s s s Per 100 students.

20 Table 3.1e. Percent of Students of Other Gender Experiencing Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Tactic, Current Year vs. Since Entering College and Enrollment Status 1 Current School Year Since Entering College Number % StdErr Number % StdErr Involving physical force or incapacitation Penetration Physical force only Completed Attempted s s s Incapacitation only s s s Both physical force and incapacitation Sexual Touching Physical force only Incapacitation only Both physical force and incapacitation Per 100 students.

27 Table 3.3. Percent of Female Students Experiencing Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Type of Behavior, Victim Characteristics and Enrollment Status 1, 2, 3 (continued) Rape Sexual Battery Since entering college 1st year nd year rd year th year th year th year Since enrolled in the college. Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact involving: 1) penetration by physical force or threat of physical force, 2) attempted, but not completed, penetration by physical force or threat of physical force; 3) penetration by incapacitation, 4) sexual touching by physical force or threat of physical force, 5) sexual touching by incapacitation. 3 Unless otherwise specified, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

28 Table 3.4a. Number of Times Females Experienced Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation by Enrollment Status for the Current year and Since Entering College 1, 2 % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Current school year Number of times 0 times time times s s 3 times or more times s s Since entering college Number of times 0 times time times times or more times Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force or c) by incapacitation.

29 Table 3.4b. Number of Times Students Reported Nonconsensual Sexual Touching by Physical Force or Incapacitation by Current School Year or Since Entering Current College by Gender and Enrollment Status 1,2 Female (n=5,273) Male (n=3,003) (n=2,189) (n=814) Current school year Number of times 0 times time times s s 3 times s s 4 or more times Since entering college Number of times 0 times time times times s s 4 or more times s s 1 Per 100 students. 2 Includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force or b) by incapacitation.

30 Table 3.5a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break Some incidents occurred during academic break All incidents occurred during academic break Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes No On university property University residence hall/dorm Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single- sex org s s s s Other residential housing Non- residential building Other property (e.g., outdoors) Not on university property Private residence Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single- sex org s s - - Restaurant, bar, or club Other social venue s s Outdoor or recreational space s s Some other place Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

31 Table 3.5b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break Some incidents occurred during academic break All incidents occurred during academic break Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes No On university property University residence hall/dorm Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single- sex org s s s s Other residential housing Non- residential building Other property (e.g., outdoors) Not on university property Private residence Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single- sex org s s - - Restaurant, bar, or club Other social venue Outdoor or recreational space Some other place Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

32 Table 3.5c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Time Occurred During Year, Location of Incident and by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Time - occurred during academic break No incidents occurred during academic break Some incidents occurred during academic break All incidents occurred during academic break Location Did it occur on campus or affiliated property? Yes No On university property University residence hall/dorm Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single- sex org Other residential housing Non- residential building s s - - Other property (e.g., outdoors) s s Not on university property Private residence Fraternity or Sorority house Other space used by single- sex org Restaurant, bar, or club Other social venue s s Outdoor or recreational space s s Some other place s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

33 Table 3.6a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female s s Male Other gender identity s s Number of offenders 1 offender offenders or more offenders University affiliation Student Faculty or instructor s s - - Coach or trainer s s - - Other staff or administrator s s - - Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with university Don t know association with university Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor s s - - Co- worker, boss or supervisor Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other Don t Know Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

34 Table 3.6b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female Male Other gender identity Number of offenders 1 offender offenders or more offenders University affiliation Student Faculty or instructor s s Coach or trainer s s - - Other staff or administrator Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) The person was not affiliated with university Don t know association with university Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor s s - - Co- worker, boss or supervisor Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other Don t Know Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

35 Table 3.6c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Offender Characteristics and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Offender characteristics Gender Female Male Other gender identity s s s s Number of offenders 1 offender offenders s s 3 or more offenders University affiliation Student Faculty or instructor Coach or trainer Other staff or administrator s s - - Other person affiliated with a university program (ex. internship, study abroad) s s s s The person was not affiliated with university s s Don t know association with university Relationship to victim At the time, it was someone I was dating or intimate with Someone I had dated or was intimate with Teacher or advisor Co- worker, boss or supervisor s s Friend or acquaintance Stranger Other s s Don t Know - - s s 1 Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

36 Table 3.7a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes No Don't know Offender using drugs Yes No Don't know Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes No Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes No Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain I suspect, but I am not certain No Don't know Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes No Not sure Per 100 victims. 2 Nonconsensual penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

37 Table 3.7b. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes No Don't know Offender using drugs Yes No Don't know Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes No Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes No Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain I suspect, but I am not certain No Don't know Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes No Not sure Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

38 Table 3.7c. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical 1, 2, 3 Force or Incapacitation by Involvement of Substances and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation Involvement of Substances % StdErr % StdErr Offender drinking alcohol Yes No s s Don't know Offender using drugs Yes No Don't know Victim voluntarily drinking alcohol Yes No Victim voluntarily using drugs Yes No Victim given alcohol or drugs without knowledge or consent Yes, I am certain I suspect, but I am not certain No Don't know s s s s Victim passed out for all or part of incident Yes No Not sure s s Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

39 Table 3.8a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration Involving Physical Force 1, 2, 3 or Incapacitation by Physical and Emotional Consequences and Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Consequences Physical Physical injuries Bruises, black- eye, cuts, scratches, or swelling Chipped or knocked out teeth Broken bones s s s s Internal injury from the sexual contact (e.g., vaginal or anal tearing) Other injuries Contract a sexually transmitted disease Become pregnant from the experience s s None of the above Emotional Difficulty concentrating on studies, assignments or exams Fearfulness or being concerned about safety Loss of interest in daily activities, or feelings of helplessness and hopelessness Nightmares or trouble sleeping Feeling numb or detached Headaches or stomach aches Eating problems or disorders Increased drug or alcohol use None of the above Per 100 victims. 2 Penetration by force includes contact that was: a) completed by physical force or threat of physical force; or b) attempted but not completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

42 Table 3.9a. Percent of Female Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and 1, 2, 3 Reasons Why Did Not Report to a Program by Behavior and Tactic Penetration Sexual Touching By Force By Incapacitation By Force By Incapacitation Report of incident to a Program % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Reported to a Program Yes No Did not contact a Program Did not know where to go or who to tell Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult I did not think anyone would believe me I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared negative social consequences I did not think anything would be done I feared it would not be kept confidential Incident was not on campus or associated with the school Incident did not occur while attending school Other Reason

44 Table 3.9b. Percent of Male Victims of Nonconsensual Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation Reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did 1, 2, 3 Not Report to a Program by Tactic By Force By Incapacitation % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program Reported to a program Inapplicable No Yes s s Did not contact a program Did not know where to go or who to tell s s Felt embarrassed, ashamed, or that it would be too emotionally difficult I did not think anyone would believe me s s I did not think anything would be done I did not think it was serious enough to report I did not want the person to get into trouble I feared it would not be kept confidential s s I feared negative social consequences Incident did not occur while attending school s s Incident was not on campus or associated with the school s s - - Other Reason Report to others Friend Family member Faculty - - s s Someone else I didn t tell anyone else Per 100 victims. 2 Sexual touching by force includes contact that was completed by physical force or threat of physical force. 3 Unless otherwise indicated, estimates are for victimizations reported since entering college.

45 Table 3.9c. Percent of Victims of Nonconsensual Penetration or Sexual Touching Involving Physical Force or Incapacitation reporting to a Program, Reporting to Others and Reasons Why Did Not Report to an Organization 1, 2 MSU Police Office for Inclusion (Title IX Coordinator s office) East Lansing or Other Community Police Agency % StdErr % StdErr % StdErr Report of incident to a Program When contacted Fall of present Fall of Summer of Fall of Summer of Prior to Fall s s s s How useful Not at all A little s s s s Somewhat s s s s Very Extremely s s - - s s Evaluation of Contact made since fall of 2014 Pressure from university on whether to proceed Yes s s To proceed s s s s Not to proceed s s s s - - No

Table A. Characteristics of Respondents that completed the survey Characteristic Category Weighted Un-weighted Number % Number % Age 18 years old 759 3.0 228 3.4 19 years old 1,462 5.7 400 6.0 20 years

Executive Summary Summary of Results Members of the Association of American Universities (AAU) are working to combat sexual assault and misconduct on their campuses. As an association of research universities,

UWM Counseling and Consultation Services Intake Form Dear Student, Date Affix Label Here (Office Use Only) Thank you for giving us the opportunity to better serve you. Please help us by taking a few minutes

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report National Crime Victimization Survey January 25, NCJ 26836 Violent Victimization of College Students, By

Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct The University of Pennsylvania Authors David Cantor, Westat Bonnie Fisher, University of Cincinnati Susan Chibnall, Westat

UW Madison Association of American Universities Sexual Assault Climate Survey Task Force Report September 21, 2015 2015 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System University of Wisconsin

CAMPUS SECURITY INFORMATION ANNUAL CAMPUS SECURITY REPORT-TULSA The following statistics are provided as part of the requirement under the Student Right- To Know and Campus Security Act, Public Law 101-542,

Checklist for Campus Sexual Misconduct Policies The Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault is committed to supporting institutions of higher education in preventing sexual misconduct, encouraging

The President s Advisory Council on Women s Issues (PACWI) represents all women at our institution, including frontline workers, residents, students, staff, faculty, alumnae, and administrators. Several

LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL APPLICATION FOR STUDENT EMPLOYMENT N-0613 (03-13) An Equal Opportunity Employer IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS APPLICATION IS FOR STUDENT EMPLOYMENT ONLY. We realize the

SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT Pratt Institute s mission is to educate men and women to become creative, responsible professionals who will contribute fully to society. The

University of Illinois at Chicago Student Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Violence Interim Policy Introduction The University of Illinois at Chicago is committed to creating a safe and secure community for

State of Alaska Violent Crimes Compensation Board Application for Crime Victim Compensation Application for Crime Victim Compensation Section 1 Claimant A separate application must be completed for each

Start Making the Most of Your Money! Answer 23 simple questions and you will get a personal report with tips on money management and budgeting, staying healthy, and protecting your financial information.

Nursing / Clinical Care Management Departments Experts suggest that 10% of all older adults are victims of abuse. Authorities believe that the reported cases are just the tip of the iceberg and that for

Performance Measure All Grantees 0.01 Number and percentage distribution of eligible participants enrolled in the program, by participant category 0.02 Number and percentage distribution of non-participant

YOU THINK IT DOESN T HAPPEN TO MEN? I couldn t look anyone in the face anymore, I thought they could see what had happened to me. Richard I never told anybody, I just tried to forget about it. I figured

Occupational Health & Safety Council of Ontario (OHSCO) WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERIES Domestic Violence Doesn t Stop When Your Worker Arrives at Work: What Employers Need to Know to Help What is

Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour Based Violence (DASH, 2009) Risk Identification and Assessment and Management Model Risk identification and assessment is not a predictive process and

Rush Center Statewide LGBT Community Survey Results Prepared for Georgia Equality and The Health initiative by the Shapiro Group In an effort to better understand the needs of gay, lesbian, bisexual and

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report August 2012 ncj 238536 National Crime Victimization Survey Victimizations Not Reported to the Police, 2006-2010

Reentry in the State of Connecticut: Partners in Progress February 24-26, 2009 Rachelle Giguere and Becki Ney What is Domestic Violence? The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) defines intimate partner violence

DUAL CREDIT APPLICATION PAPERWORK I. Dual Credit General Information and Checklist A. General Information Dual Credit is the broad term for various opportunities for students to take college coursework

1 Abuse in Same-Sex Relationships Abuse in relationships is any behavior or pattern of behavior used to coerce, dominate or isolate the other partner. It is the use of any form of power that is imposed

CAHPS Survey for ACOs Participating in Medicare Initiatives 2014 Medicare Provider Satisfaction Survey Survey Instructions This survey asks about you and the health care you received in the last six months.

Domestic Violence A briefing for Healthcare Professionals A briefing for Healthcare Professionals As health care professionals, we are privileged to play a unique and important role in the lives of our

2015 CFPB annual employee survey December 2015 Introduction Interpretation of results More than 79 percent of the CFPB employee population responded to the fourth annual employee survey conducted by the

2014 CFPB annual employee survey December 2014 Introduction Interpretation of results More than 83 percent of the CFPB employee population responded to the third annual employee survey conducted by the

1 of 5 2/24/2009 9:22 AM Campus Crime Awareness Title II of the Student Right to Know and Campus Security Act, know as the Campus Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990, requires that colleges

Date of report: Name of campus security authority: Date that incident occurred (mm/dd/yyyy): If multiple incidents were reported or if the date the incident occurred is unknown, please note below: Reporting

Determinants and Correlations of Excessive Alcohol Use and Depression among College Students in a North East University Irfan Syed, M.B.B.S., M.P.H Sandra Minor Bulmer, Ph.D. Christine Unson, Ph.D. SOUTHERN

Personal Injury Questionnaire Patient Information Date Date of Birth Health Insurance Do you have a Flex Spending (FSA) or Health Savings (HSA) Account? Y N Patient Name First M Last What do you prefer

Name: Thank you for your interest in the Summer Nursing Intern Program at Johnson Memorial Health Services. Please complete the application packet. Interns must be enrolled in a summer internship course

FSSE-G 2015 Respondent Profile NSSEID: 888888 About This Report The display below highlights details in the FSSE-G Respondent Profile report that are important to keep in mind when interpreting your results.

Building Relationships of Trust Community Perception Survey SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS (Complete the survey, save the document and email to jluther@diamondhead.ms.gov ) You may also print out, mail or hand

Northern New Mexico College DRAFT NOEL-LEVITZ STUDENT SATISFACTION INVENTORY (FORM B) Four-Year College and University Version Following are the results from the STUDENT SATISFACTION INVENTORY Form B (or

FSSE-G 2015 Respondent Profile IPEDS: 179566 About This Report The display below highlights details in the FSSE-G Respondent Profile report that are important to keep in mind when interpreting your results.

Frequently Asked Questions: Reporting Child Abuse and Neglect in the University System of Maryland I. What Constitutes Child Abuse and Neglect A. What is Child Abuse? Abuse is defined in Maryland law as

Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking Policy Statement Introduction The University of West Georgia is committed to providing a safe learning and working environment for all. In order to comply

Page 1 of 10 World-class academics with a personal touch a unique combination you won t find anywhere else! You can choose from over 90 different academic programs with opportunities for both undergraduate

Promise Neighborhoods Research Consortium (PNRC) Neighborhood Checkup Survey of Current Supports for Successful Youth Development First, we are going to ask you a few questions about your. For this survey,

September 30, 2015 CRIMINAL JUSTICE STUDENT SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM The City of Anderson is seeking applicants to participate in a new program to provide qualified individuals with the opportunity to attend

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008 Statistical Tables National Crime Victimization Survey Table of contents

This document reports data from the 2013 School Crime Supplement (SCS) of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). 1 The Web Tables show the extent to which with different personal characteristics

BERKELEY COLLEGE Equal Opportunity Policy Purpose Recognizing that its diversity greatly enhances the workplace and opportunities for learning, Berkeley is firmly committed to providing all associates,

BUSINESS INFORMATION Small Business Administration Loan Application Business Name Structure (Corporation, Partnership, Sole P., LLC) Address Type of Business City, State, Zip No. of Employees: Before After

ATTORNEYS Sexual Assault of a Child VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS 1. What are your feelings or opinions about criminal defense attorneys? 2. Have you ever had a bad experience with a criminal defense attorney? If

Selected Socio-Economic Data African American and White, Not Hispanic www.fairvote2020.org www.fairdata2000.com 5-Feb-12 C03002. HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN BY RACE - Universe: TOTAL POPULATION Population