15:43:23 <bhyland> Per cygri telecon 21-Feb-2013, going to LC with Data Cube based on SDMX 2.0 would be acceptable. Cygri would prefer, time permitting SDMX 2.1, would make the quality of the vocab deliverable much better. He guarantee this will happen but will make good faith effort to do so.

Bernadette Hyland: Per cygri telecon 21-Feb-2013, going to LC with Data Cube based on SDMX 2.0 would be acceptable. Cygri would prefer, time permitting SDMX 2.1, would make the quality of the vocab deliverable much better. He cannot guarantee this will happen but will make good faith effort to do so.←

15:49:12 <cygri> atemezi, what needs to be done is review the changes between SDMX 2.0 and SDMX 2.1 (there's a summary of changes document from the SDMX people), and decide what (if anything) needs to be done about these changes in Data Cube

Richard Cyganiak: atemezi, what needs to be done is review the changes between SDMX 2.0 and SDMX 2.1 (there's a summary of changes document from the SDMX people), and decide what (if anything) needs to be done about these changes in Data Cube←