Tag Archives: Police officer

I am a police officer in a large agency in Florida. I have served on the streets of this city for 16 years and have seen more than my share of “Gun Violence,” with several occasions where the bullets were intended for my head.

If a liberal read that, they would assume I am for total gun control. In reality, I – like most police officers in the country, am firmly against the joke and lie that liberals try to play off as a “means to make society safer.”

Lobbying for stricter gun control because of a the actions of a deranged individual is in practice and morality, the functional equivalent of having a coalition of rape victims lobby for the castration of all men…

___

Good gun! How it should always end when the bad guys do their deeds. To bad the good guy was injured…

They come out of Ivy League schools after taking ecstasy, DMT, mushrooms, synthetic pot, and the result is what we are seeing…..Everyone of those panelists needs the tar kicked out of them in the real world for about fifteen years, because they’ve never even seen it.

Major Players
On the gun control issue, only a few small activist groups dedicate their work to banning guns. Here is the list, with the most recent available annual revenues shown on their IRS tax returns:

Who needs to limit clip capacity??

EAST CLEVELAND, OH — Two unarmed suspects were slain by police officers after a 25-minute pursuit. At the conclusion of the chase, which included 62 police vehicles, 13 officers drew their weapons and unloaded at least 137 rounds in to the suspects’ Chevy Malibu. No weapons were found, and there was no evidence of return fire. The police were so violent and so reckless that they even shot up their own cruisers with friendly fire.

The police supervisor was only aware of 3 patrol cars pursuing the suspects. The remaining 59 had no authorization to join the chase, and ignored dispatch’s instructions to terminate pursuit.

One officer climbed on top of the suspects’ vehicle and shot 49 rounds into the occupants.

NBC News has gotten its hands on a white paper that’s being used to legitimize the Obama administration’s drone policy, and it’s a… doozy. Short version: members of terrorist groups actively attacking the United States (or our interests) can expect to be shot on sight; and that includes the members of terrorist groups that happen to also be American citizens. And the administration does not have the inclination, and does not feels that it has the need, to particularly clear with anybody their taking the shot if a suitable target hoves into view. . . . please click here for the rest of the post →

You should not be intimidated or threatened or subjugated to unreasonable force, threats against your person, property nor should your family..

It is written so in so archaic piece of literature, some really smart folks, much unlike those we elected to lead us today. Shit, so unlike those we have purportedly leading us today, they would probably be carrying their muskets around again.

“…Dayton said when lawmakers were debating the bill last year, he was “concerned because law enforcement in Minnesota was mostly opposed to it, felt that it gave citizens more freedoms and rights than they had.”…”

Devastating Democrats in this quirky and sarcastic political blog about the state of our world today, the hyperbole of liberal liars, and the rise of a President who will (eventually) Make America Great Again.