I will take a man that was not much unlike any other teenager or young adult who did some stupid shit during that time over a man during his adult professional life was closely affiliated with a home-grown terrorist, ACORN, Rev Jeremiah Wright, and had an appetite for concain and the list goes on...

I will take a man that was not much unlike any other teenager or young adult who did some stupid shit during that time over a man during his adult professional life was closely affiliated with a home-grown terrorist, ACORN, Rev Jeremiah Wright, and had an appetite for concain and the list goes on...

Your talking points are sooooo 4 years ago. Time to get some fresh material.

All else being equaly, if you pit the two candidate's personal experiences against one another I sure as shit will take Romey all day long.

Maybe lay-off the emoticons and look at what you're typing. And you don't seem to be getting the point; nobody gives two shits about your deluded take on personal experiences - let it go.

Obama's been president for 3.5 years, and he has a fairly consistent political stand, whereas Romney's a walking contradiction. Obviously, conservatives don't like Obama's political stand, which is their right. So why can't you just say you're voting for the other guy because you're a conservative, and leave it at that?

Maybe lay-off the emoticons and look at what you're typing. And you don't seem to be getting the point; nobody gives two shits about your deluded take on personal experiences - let it go.

Obama's been president for 3.5 years, and he has a fairly consistent political stand, whereas Romney's a walking contradiction. Obviously, conservatives don't like Obama's political stand, which is their right. So why can't you just say you're voting for the other guy because you're a conservative, and leave it at that?

I want you to look at what I am typing -- look very closely... You are a sad little man, a man that sounds more foolish each time you open your mouth.

While your diarrhea of the mouth is amusing at times and your conviction in what you believe might be admirable to some, I blame you and everyone else like you for the current state of this country. I wish I could put you all on a boat and ship you off to France or Greece where you belong.

And since we are asking questions of one another, why do you have to spew your nonsense in every post that does not praise your savior or agree with your political view point? You are such a goddamn hypocrite just like the rest of your left lemming friends.

...Long before the national media spotlight began to shine on every twist and turn of his life's journey, Barack Obama had this to say about himself: "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. . . . I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind."

....In the book, Obama acknowledges that he used cocaine as a high school student but rejected heroin. "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though," he says.

...Long before the national media spotlight began to shine on every twist and turn of his life's journey, Barack Obama had this to say about himself: "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. . . . I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind."

....In the book, Obama acknowledges that he used cocaine as a high school student but rejected heroin. "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though," he says.

Yeah baby, he knows all the right words through personal experience. I'd prefer a president that is perhaps not so comfortable using the street names for coke and heroin. This guy started out low rent and went downhill from there.

...Long before the national media spotlight began to shine on every twist and turn of his life's journey, Barack Obama had this to say about himself: "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. . . . I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind."

....In the book, Obama acknowledges that he used cocaine as a high school student but rejected heroin. "Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though," he says.

Gee, you quoted his book from several years ago, where he was speaking about his childhood. Wow, this is breaking news! Get a life. You guys elected George W cokehead TWICE, who also created the debt we're in. Is there an IQ test to get a BMW?

Lets at least be honets about Mitts charitable contributions.....you guys can fiddle back and forth about you opinions on either candidate....over 4 million to the Mormon church......while I don't question his faith..nor am I saying that the LDS doesnt do good things in their respective communities but, have you seen the architechural monuments the Mormon church builds.....amazing.

Gee, you quoted his book from several years ago, where he was speaking about his childhood. Wow, this is breaking news! Get a life. You guys elected George W cokehead TWICE, who also created the debt we're in. Is there an IQ test to get a BMW?

See there you go again, showing off how little you know and re-writing history to fit your contorted perspective... Obama has added more to the debt in his 3.5 yrs than Bush did during two terms. Let me break this down for you a little more not that it will stop your big mouth from running throwing out bullshit...

During Bush's two terms the debt rose by $4.899 trillion. Since Obummer took office, in just 3.5 yrs the debt increased $4.939 trillion! According to the Bureau of Public Debt at the Treasury Department the National Debt now stands at $15.566 trillion. It was $10.626 trillion on President Bush's last day in office, which coincided with President Obama's first day.

Oh and let's not forget that while Bush was in office the Democrats were in control of Congress since 2007.

Your boy Obummer was a voting member of Congress at the time. Obummer voted for most of the policies that were put in place and are still in place today. And how could we neglect your buddies Barney Frank and Chris Dodd., the two architects of the housing bublble.

See there you go again, showing off how little you know and re-writing history to fit your contorted perspective... Obama has added more to the debt in his 3.5 yrs than Bush did during two terms. Let me break this down for you a little more not that it will stop your big mouth from running throwing out bullshit comments...

During Bush's two terms the debt rose by $4.899 trillion. Since Obummer took office, in just 3.5 yrs the debt increased $4.939 trillion! According to the Bureau of Public Debt at the Treasury Department the National Debt now stands at $15.566 trillion. It was $10.626 trillion on President Bush's last day in office, which coincided with President Obama's first day.

Oh and let's not forget that while Bush was in office the Democrats were in control of Congress since 2007.

Your boy Obummer was a voting member of Congress at the time. Obummer voted for most of the policies that were put in place and are still in place today. And how could we neglect your buddies Barney Frank and Chris Dodd., the two architects of the housing bublble.

Do you understand percentages? It doubled under Bush, It's up less than 50% under Obama, Einstein. But the main point is the cause of the debt - 2 wars and 2 unfunded tax cuts, all Bush. And TARP, which was Bush. And the shortfall caused by the massive recession we just went through. Obama's stimulus constitutes a fraction of the debt, and most of It's been paid back. You need to find stupider people to debate with.

Do you understand percentages? It doubled under Bush, It's up less than 50% under Obama, Einstein. But the main point is the cause of the debt - 2 wars and 2 unfunded tax cuts, all Bush. And TARP, which was Bush. And the shortfall caused by the massive recession we just went through. Obama's stimulus constitutes a fraction of the debt, and most of It's been paid back. You need to find stupider people to debate with.

Lets at least be honets about Mitts charitable contributions.....you guys can fiddle back and forth about you opinions on either candidate....over 4 million to the Mormon church......while I don't question his faith..nor am I saying that the LDS doesnt do good things in their respective communities but, have you seen the architechural monuments the Mormon church builds.....amazing.

You know, I am having hard time believing into these "charitable contributions" every (regardless of party affiliation) millionaire is so quick to give, since they give them pretty substantial tax breaks. I would like to see how many people would still be so charitable if they got nothing in return.

Oh yeah, and lets not forget that Mormon "tithing" (A tithe ( /ˈtaɪš/; from Old English: teogoža "tenth") is a one-tenth part of something) expects you to give the church at least 10% of your income, which is where most of Romney's "charity" goes into. 2 birds with one stone - please the church and get a tax break. And considering Romney's wealth, these 4 million are a drop in a bucket for him.

And yes, I have seen the "architechural monuments" you are speaking of. They are nothing but an eye sore to me, but hey, if you think that its acceptable that churches are completely tax exempt, while racking in the donations cash and building all these lavish structures, maybe you would support taxing them, instead of the "job creators"?

Do you understand percentages? It doubled under Bush, It's up less than 50% under Obama, Einstein. But the main point is the cause of the debt - 2 wars and 2 unfunded tax cuts, all Bush. And TARP, which was Bush. And the shortfall caused by the massive recession we just went through. Obama's stimulus constitutes a fraction of the debt, and most of It's been paid back. You need to find stupider people to debate with.

You never cease to amaze!

You can slice and dice it anyway you want you mathmatically challenged twit. Let me say this again because it is clear that you and your dunderhead uneducated left wing buddies are to stupid to comprehend it.

Under the Bush presidency the debt rose by $4.8 trillion -- IN 2 terms (that's 8 yrs for those of you don't know what that means) OBAMA spent $4.9 trillion in just 3.5 yrs!

Again here is how stupid you are... You continue to throw your own peeps under the bus each time you open your mouth. TARP could not be signed by the president unless the Democrats in congress approved it.

Speaking of debt and who is responsible for running it up see if you can wrap your pee brain around these figures...

2003 - 2007 Republicans controlled congress for 48 months and the debt at the start was $6,382,650,489,675 and at the end of the term was $8,677,214,255,313 Debt increased by $2,294,563,765,638 at an avg daily accumulation $47,803,411,784

2007 - 2009 Democrat controlled for 24 months and the debt at the start was $8,677,214,255,313 and at the end of their run the debt increased to $10,627,961,295,931 Debt increased by $1,950,747,040,618 at an average daily accumulation $81,281,126,692

2009 - 2011 Democrat's controlled congress for 24 months and the debt at the start of their term was $10,627,961,295,931 and at the end of their term it increased to $14,014,049,043,294 the debt increased by $3,386,087,747,363 at and avg daily accumulation $141,086,989,473.

Now see if you can muster the brain power to add up how much the debt increased during the months the DEMOCRATS CONTROLLED congress.

You can slice and dice it anyway you want you mathmatically challenged twit. Let me say this again because it is clear and that you and your dunderhead uneducated left wing buddies are to stupid to comprehend it.

Under the Bush presidency the debt rose by $4.8 trillion -- IN 2 terms (that's 8 yrs for those of you don't know what that means) OBAMA spent $4.9 trillion in just 3.5 yrs!

Again here is how stupid you are... You continue to throw your own peeps under the bus each time you open your mouth. TARP could not be signed by the president unless the Democrats in congress approved it.

Speaking of debt and who is responsible for running it up see if you can wrap your pee brain around these figures...

2003 - 2007 Republicans controlled congress for 48 months and the debt at the start was $6,382,650,489,675 and at the end of the term was $8,677,214,255,313 Debt increased by $2,294,563,765,638 at an avg daily accumulation $47,803,411,784

2007 - 2009 Democrat controlled for 24 months and the debt at the start was $8,677,214,255,313 and at the end of their run the debt increased to $10,627,961,295,931 Debt increased by $1,950,747,040,618 at an average daily accumulation $81,281,126,692

2009 - 2011 Democrat's controlled congress for 24 and the debt at the start of their term was $10,627,961,295,931 and at the end of their term it increased to $14,014,049,043,294 the debt increased by $3,386,087,747,363 at and avg daily accumulation $141,086,989,473.

Now see if you can muster the brain power to add up how much the debt increased during the months the DEMOCRATS CONTROLLED congress.

By the same logic you are using, one could assume also that the current deficit issue is due to the REPLUBICAN CONTROLLED House?

2003 - 2007 Republicans controlled congress for 48 months and the debt at the start was $6,382,650,489,675 and at the end of the term was $8,677,214,255,313 Debt increased by $2,294,563,765,638 at an avg daily accumulation $47,803,411,784

.

Don't have a dog in this fight but to be fair neither of the two wars started during the Bush era were included in those figures, by 08 the Iraq war alone was in the several hundred billions, over quadruple the 60 billion est by Bush Admin....not sure what politics came into play for Obama Admin that added the war debt but, had that been in place during Bush era he may have won the "most increased debt award"........