Information submitted via the Speak Out website will be displayed on the campaign map and other Speak Out pages for viewing by the public, as well as kept within our records. Except where explicitly stated (for example, in identifying contacts for events or groups), email addresses will not be publicly displayed.

Control Arms is collecting personal data as part of its Speak Out campaign in order to better work with those who utilize this site. Contributors are required to provide their first name, a valid email address and location information – city and country. Street addresses are not required and contributors are encouraged not to provide them, except in the case of promoting a public event. Surnames are optional.

Control Arms does not share mailing lists with other organizations. If needed, contributors can also remove themselves from mailing lists or update their details or their submission by emailing us at info@controlarms.org.

Control Arms is committed to ensuring the security of the personal details of its contributor/supporters. Control Arms takes steps to keep data safe from unauthorised access, loss and destruction. Any data held in hardcopy form is shredded before disposal.

Use and Copyright

Control Arms encourages supporters to submit original and personally owned material, such as photographs and videos, or material to which that person possesses all relevant copyright privileges for re-distribution and sharing.

Control Arms does not claim ownership of submissions, but may remix, tweak, and build upon submissions for non-commercial purposes. Where feasible, Control Arms will give credit to the author(s).

Profanity, Abusive Behavior, and Removal of Content

Control Arms asks that people submitting to this site avoid the use of profanity and refrain from abusive behavior. This site is intended for the use of supporters of the Control Arms call to action, which advocates for:

A robust Arms Trade Treaty to stop transfers when there is a substantial risk that the arms or ammunition are likely to be used in serious violations of international humanitarian law or international human rights law, or fuel armed violence and undermine socio-economic development.

A legally-binding Arms Trade Treaty that holds governments accountable to existing standards of international law and the UN Charter.

A global, comprehensive treaty that includes all conventional weapons and ammunition, all transfers and all transactions.

An enforceable treaty that includes detailed guidelines for full implementation, reporting, international cooperation, compliance and accountability.

Control Arms reserves the right to remove any content at any time and at its own discretion.

If you spot material that you believe is abusive, profane, or otherwise inconsistent with the intended purposes of the Speak Out campaign, please contact us at info@controlarms.org .

Since then, Control Arms has continued to push governments to sign the ATT, fully implement it, and strengthen it – and by doing so, protect those living in regions most vulnerable to the damaging and dangerous arms trade.

The launch of Control Arms’ ATT Monitor Report 2017 provided an overview of the main findings and analysis of the third Annual Report, which this year has a special focus on transparency. All three co-hosts of this event, Australia, Ireland, and the Netherlands, lauded the ATT Monitor for serving as a “trusted”, “fact-based” analysis of ATT reporting “vital to the proper implementation of the Treaty.” Control Arms also co-hosted a side event with Finland, and Japan to review Conference of States Parties 2017 and discussed prospects for CSP 2018. Control Arms’ Cindy Ebbs stressed civil society’s disappointment with the continued focus on procedural issues and lack of substantive discussions at CSP 2017. She also highlighted the role of the Control Arms Coalition in supporting the Treaty’s universalization and effective implementation through active participation at the CSP 2017 and stressed priority areas of work in advance of CSP 2018.

Roundtables on the development of practical guidelines for risk assessment of Gender Based Violence, and implementation training for specific Latin American states with a focus on prevention diversion and GBV, generated productive input.

In a strong statement delivered to the Committee, Control Arms called upon delegates to shift the focus of discussions around the ATT from procedural to substantive matters and address actual arms transfers. These views were shared also by a number of delegations, e.g. New Zealand who stated: “the time has come to start shifting our focus from institutional arrangements to ensuring that the Treaty delivers on its humanitarian and security promise”.

Control Arms colleagues from Africa, Latin America and the Pacific joined the New York team, and engaged in multiple meetings with delegations from across their regions, urging support and action on effective Treaty implementation.

This year’s “Arms Trade Treaty” resolution, was focused mostly on procedural issues, and highlighted the linkages with the Sustainable Development Goals and welcomed key decisions taken at the third CSP. Specifically, it welcomed the establishment of three standing working groups on implementation, universalisation, and reporting and transparency as well as the operationalization of the ATT Voluntary Trust Fund (VTF). Introduced by Japan and co-sponsored by 91 member states, the ATT resolution was adopted with 144 votes in favor and 29 abstentions. The most significant and disappointing change in voting patterns this year was the United States, who abstained from the ATT resolution for the first time since the Treaty’s adoption. In an explanation of the vote, the US said it was “conducting standard reviews of various international agreements, including the Arms Trade Treaty, and as such [is] not in a position to vote ‘yes.’” Although the US stated it will continue to support efforts to prevent and eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and prevent their diversion, the abstention validates concerns about the country’s continued engagement with the ATT under the current administration.