'Valiant Hearts' Struggles Between Adventure and Documentary

Valiant Hearts wants to show us that war isn’t caused by super villains, and their defeat changes nothing in the grand scheme of things. However, the presence of a super villain in the story still detracts from the harsh reality the game wants to explore.

Valiant Hearts and Never Alone are what I would call docu-platformers -- puzzle-platforming games that seek to educate the player on some aspect of history or culture. As such, they share a striking similarity in approach. They purposefully avoid being literal or realistic, instead cherry picking certain aspects of World War I or Iñupiaq culture that can be easily integrated into the typical puzzle-platformer gameplay. They then use collectibles to expand upon those gameplay moments.

In Valiant Hearts, as I learn the controls in the barracks, the game unlocks additional “Facts” that explain the makeup of troop regiments. When I play as Freddie, an American at the Battle of Marne, the game unlocks more "Facts" about the historical importance of the battle, the use of machine guns, and the role of Americans like Freddie in the French army. In Never Alone, I learn about spirit animals and bolas just as I find a bola of my own and I meet my white fox friend. These games are extremely similar in their approach, yet Never Alone is wildly more successful in its goal of creating a documentary in the form of a game.

The problem with Valiant Hearts is that it tries to be a Tin Tin style cartoon adventure in addition to being a somber exploration of the horrors of war. For much of the game, the four playable characters (Emil, Freddie, Anna, and Karl) are battling against a cartoon villain named Baron von Dorf. This villain rides in a special zeppelin with a special tank, he makes last-second escapes by grabbing onto rope ladders and flying away, he laughs at our attempts to catch him, and he has a super thick mustache, which, as we all know, is a clear symbol of villainy. Whereas the game wants Emil, Freddie, Anna, and Karl to be stand-ins for the average soldier. However, the game then faces them off against an enemy who is very clearly not representative of all German soldiers.

This causes the game to feel tonally imbalanced for much of its runtime. One level I’m learning about how Chlorine gas burns the eyes and lungs while dragging dying soldiers out of rubble, and the next I’m using a church pipe organ to blow dynamite back into von Dorf’s face.

To the game’s credit, von Dorf is defeated before the game's end. Valiant Hearts wants to show us that war isn’t caused by super villains, and their defeat changes nothing in the grand scheme of things. However, the presence of such a super villain in the story still detracts from the harsh reality the game wants to explore. Valiant Hearts finds its footing after von Dorf is defeated and our cast can finally become symbolic of the average soldier. Without a common enemy to unite them, they splinter off to deal with things beyond the conflicts at the front: hospitals, prisoner of war camps, mutiny, and more. Valiant Hearts refocuses itself on the war and in doing so becomes a better documentary. It just takes a while to get to that point.

By contrast, Never Alone never once feels inconsistent or confused about its goals. Every aspects of its design, from its puzzles to its rewards to its levels and even its story, all circle back to Iñupiaq culture. This is a game about the Iñupiaq people, and it is never not about them.

The story is the easiest point of comparison to Valiant Hearts, and Never Alone adapts an Iñupiaq folk tale into a video game. It doesn’t tell a story about a character experiencing Iñupiaq culture. It tells a story that is directly from and about the Iñupiaq culture. All of its obstacles, conflicts, and resolutions reflect things that that people care about or worry about, so our heroine’s adventure never conflicts with the game’s documentary goals. Nothing in the game feels out of place or incongruous because everything circles back to the Iñupiaq.

It also helps that the tone of the adventure matches the tone of the documentary. The collectibles videos are backed by a dreamy soundscape that matches the gentle atmosphere of the platforming, and there are few outright enemies in Never Alone. We’re mostly battling the environment, and even when we do encounter mystical obstacles, they’re rarely antagonistic. Sure, they get in our way or kill us, but they don’t set out to do those things. The mystical creatures of the world are simply doing their own thing, and the player will be perfectly fine as long as these creatures are avoided.

Never Alone is focused solely on its documentary, making it the more cohesive experience. Valiant Hearts tries to tell two stories at once, a fun adventure story and a more somber documentary story. I love me some Indiana Jones, but an Indiana Jones movie never tries to be an accurate depiction of World War II. That would be ridiculous, and it feels ridiculous when Valiant Hearts tries to do it with World War I.

White Hills epic '80s callback
Stop Mute Defeat is a determined march against encroaching imperial darkness; their eyes boring into the shadows for danger but they're aware that blinding lights can kill and distort truth. From "Overlord's" dark stomp casting nets for totalitarian warnings to "Attack Mode", which roars in with the tribal certainty that we can survive the madness if we keep our wits, the record is a true and timely win for Dave W. and Ego Sensation. Martin Bisi and the poster band's mysterious but relevant cool make a great team and deliver one of their least psych yet most mind destroying records to date. Much like the first time you heard Joy Division or early Pigface, for example, you'll experience being startled at first before becoming addicted to the band's unique microcosm of dystopia that is simultaneously corrupting and seducing your ears. - Morgan Y. Evans

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

"...when the history books get written about this era, they'll show that the music community recognized the potential impacts and were strong leaders." An interview with Kevin Erickson of Future of Music Coalition.

Last week, the musician Phil Elverum, a.k.a. Mount Eerie, celebrated the fact that his album A Crow Looked at Me had been ranked #3 on the New York Times' Best of 2017 list. You might expect that high praise from the prestigious newspaper would result in a significant spike in album sales. In a tweet, Elverum divulged that since making the list, he'd sold…six. Six copies.

Under the lens of cultural and historical context, as well as understanding the reflective nature of popular culture, it's hard not to read this film as a cautionary tale about the limitations of isolationism.

I recently spoke to a class full of students about Plato's "Allegory of the Cave". Actually, I mentioned Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" by prefacing that I understood the likelihood that no one had read it. Fortunately, two students had, which brought mild temporary relief. In an effort to close the gap of understanding (perhaps more a canyon or uncanny valley) I made the popular quick comparison between Plato's often cited work and the Wachowski siblings' cinema spectacle, The Matrix. What I didn't anticipate in that moment was complete and utter dissociation observable in collective wide-eyed stares. Example by comparison lost. Not a single student in a class of undergraduates had partaken of The Matrix in all its Dystopic future shock and CGI kung fu technobabble philosophy. My muted response in that moment: Whoa!

Allen Ginsberg and Robert Lowell at St. Mark's Church in New York City, 23 February 1977

Scholar Christopher Grobe crafts a series of individually satisfying case studies, then shows the strong threads between confessional poetry, performance art, and reality television, with stops along the way.

Tracing a thread from Robert Lowell to reality TV seems like an ominous task, and it is one that Christopher Grobe tackles by laying out several intertwining threads. The history of an idea, like confession, is only linear when we want to create a sensible structure, the "one damn thing after the next" that is the standing critique of creating historical accounts. The organization Grobe employs helps sensemaking.