Yes, unions are "enemy of the White man," not multinational corporations always willing to relocate to India or China if it helps their bottom line.. It's obviously "patriotic" to support international capitalism, what was I thinking?!

By the way, the BNP wholeheartedly supports the 'Solidarity Trade Union' in the UK, which among other things, advocates:

"...the re-Nationalisation of essential public services such as the Railway system and Royal Mail. Privatisation has failed and has been simply a means to give multinational companies a means to profit at our expense. Alongside re-Nationalisation we would like to see the banking and financial sectors re-structured so that their enormous resources were deployed to benefit the people. Far greater industrial democracy and a wider spread of ownership through Workers trusts, co-operatives, family businesses and self-employment are something we would support."

White Nationalism is not a single issue movement (Race), and never has been; the base support of Labour, as part of an organic stratum, is axiomatic.

What we see today as 'labor unions' is a far cry from the healthy and pro-racial standards of the Guilds which bore them. Working class, and that is the majority of posters on this board, simply means 'common folk', the broad base of any nation. This, specifically is what always drew me to NS, as it embodied, at least in the grand attempt, to both utilize and benefit from the power of the working class for the betterment of the greater nation, or Folk-state.

This has turned into an interesting discussion, kinda reminds me of the old SF, where real issues can be fielded which, without a doubt, have a major bearing on what we can and will do when we are in a position to change our destiny.

Unions, like anything else, can be misdirected; race, if paramount, will imbue the working relationship between us and management with a healthy respect for both Work and Race-culture.

Beck, by the way, serves neither...

__________________

“To have fidelity, and for the sake of fidelity to risk honour and blood, even in...dangerous courses.”
~ Thus Spake Zarathustra

The truth is that the communist is merely clamoring to be the "bourgois" status he envies, and inevitably becomes. It is not earned by personal achievement but by collective theft. Illuminism, humanism, and Marxist ideologies: communism, socialism and liberalism are jewish. Their tactic has always been to accuse you of what they truly are in order to achieve their goal.

The truth is that the communist is merely clamoring to be the "bourgois" status he envies, and inevitably becomes. It is not earned by personal achievement but by collective theft. Illuminism, humanism, and Marxist ideologies: communism, socialism and liberalism are jewish. Their tactic has always been to accuse you of what they truly are in order to achieve their goal.

As if ever the case with you Alex Jones conspiracy-types, you remain conspicuously silent about the exploitative nature of capitalism and the Jew's intimate role in its creation and function. No, instead you focus your attention on the nonexistent "Illuminati" and try to conflate ideologies as diverse from one another as communism, liberalism, and socialism are. Socialism is an ideology specifically created by White Europeans, as even Adolf Hitler (correctly) pointed out:

"For Socialism in itself is anything but an international creation. As a noble conception it has indeed grown up exclusively in Aryan hearts: it owes its intellectual glories only to Aryan brains. It is entirely alien to the Jew."

The innumerable nationalists who supported the notion of a socialist economy throughout European history were not dupes of Zionists, but rather intelligent individuals genuinely interested in maximizing racial solidarity, and they understood that socialism would greatly assist in establishing that bond.

Glenn Beck does not give a damn about white people. Sometimes out of boredom I listen to his show on my work commute. I have heard him ridicule the German race on his show before. Beck, hmm? sounds pretty German to me bud. His latest thing is kissing Martin Luther King Jr's ass every day. It's disgusting. He does not stand for white people. People like him are dangerous because they either cannot or refuse to make the race connection that is so obvious. Sometimes I think he is here to mislead people who are upset.

White Nationalism is not a single issue movement (Race), and never has been; the base support of Labour, as part of an organic stratum, is axiomatic.

What we see today as 'labor unions' is a far cry from the healthy and pro-racial standards of the Guilds which bore them. Working class, and that is the majority of posters on this board, simply means 'common folk', the broad base of any nation. This, specifically is what always drew me to NS, as it embodied, at least in the grand attempt, to both utilize and benefit from the power of the working class for the betterment of the greater nation, or Folk-state.

This has turned into an interesting discussion, kinda reminds me of the old SF, where real issues can be fielded which, without a doubt, have a major bearing on what we can and will do when we are in a position to change our destiny.

Unions, like anything else, can be misdirected; race, if paramount, will imbue the working relationship between us and management with a healthy respect for both Work and Race-culture.

Beck, by the way, serves neither...

The trade unions in Europe were mainly organized by Marxists in the 19th century, and were nothing but Jewish tools to mislead the working class. There were also Christian, non-socialist trade unions but their importance and membership were small. Patriotic industrialists often refused to negotiate with the Marxist unions as a matter of principle.

The trade unions in Europe were mainly organized by Marxists in the 19th century, and were nothing but Jewish tools to mislead the working class. There were also Christian, non-socialist trade unions but their importance and membership were small. Patriotic industrialists often refused to negotiate with the Marxist unions as a matter of principle.

Nationalists have historically participated actively in strike-breaking organizations. Virtually all union-organized strikes in Europe in the 20th century served the interests of international Communism.

Apparently those wonderful "patriotic industrialists" also refused to negotiate with National Socialist trade unions—which led to the NSDAP's union (the NSBO) participating in over 117 strikes just between April 1932 - January 1933 alone, once even going so far as to unite with the KPD's union during the Berlin Transport Workers' Strike in 1932. The NSBO even used armed violence in order to offset a salary reduction in one particular factory *source Helmut Lensing, Die Nationalsozialistische Betriebszellen-Organisation und die NS-Machtergreifung in der Grafschaft Bentheim, Bentheimer Jahrbuch 1993 (= Das Bentheimer Land Vol. 125), Bad Bentheim 1992, Pages 167-194.

Of course there were bourgeois nationalist parties in the past which served as the industrialist's useful idiots in breaking strikes; the Soviet government also suppressed workers' strikes in the USSR for that matter. Even Mussolini used the Blackshirts to suppress a few workers' strikes in Italy before he came to power—which is ironic considering how many strikes he personally led when he was still a prominent members of the Italian Socialist Party. But, of course, Mussolini ultimately came to regret this decision after the bourgeoisie finally betrayed him and the entire Fascist cause; which led to him assigning his friend, the Italian Socialist Nicola Bombacci, to the position of authoring the radical economic reforms the Italian Social Republic was to embrace (see the Congress of Verona 1943).

What were Bombacci's final words before being executed by anti-fascist partisans?

I didn't catch the show but I have seen some of GB stuff. I just have one question about the unions was he targeting ones who supported Obama or the neutral und opposing ones?

idk but anybody who's against obama right now is good in my books plus when it comes to the majority racist crowd of blacks who voted for him I think the divide and conquer strategy will do just fine at the moment.

The trade unions in Europe were mainly organized by Marxists in the 19th century, and were nothing but Jewish tools to mislead the working class. There were also Christian, non-socialist trade unions but their importance and membership were small. Patriotic industrialists often refused to negotiate with the Marxist unions as a matter of principle.

If you're going to make statements about the Unions in Britain, use something more reliable than a Conservative newspaper.
Wikipedia isn't much better but...

Quote:

The Tolpuddle Martyrs were a group of 19th century English agricultural labourers who were arrested for and convicted of swearing a secret oath as members of the Friendly Society of Agricultural Labourers. The rules of the society show it was clearly structured as a friendly society and operated as a trade-specific benefit society. But at the time, friendly societies had strong elements of what we now consider to be the predominant role of trade unions. The Tolpuddle Martyrs were subsequently sentenced to transportation to Australia.

Hardly Marxist or Jewish, what were they "transported" for? Daring to organise a Society for the betterment of farm workers. What did these 'Marxist' trouble makers want? A fair days pay for a fair days work, and decent living conditions.
Oh and by the way, quite a few non marxists gave money to the miners, not for political reasons but for humanitarian ones. Why did Thatcher manipulate idiots like Scargill into striking? Find out.

Source:
"From grand duchy to modern state: a political history of Finland since 1809" by Osmo Jussila,Seppo Hentilä,Jukka Nevakivi.

Martti Pihkala was one of the most important nationalist leaders in Finland as well as the leader of the strike-breaking organization, Vientirauha. He was one of the few Finnish MPs who was aware of the Jewish question at the time.