July 24, 2006

So's your old man

Like President Bush at his best, Tiny is not afraid to express her feelings. Above in a post-catnip stupor at the base of Goomp's scratching post over the weekend, she let it all hang out.

"What we ought to have learned from the terror attacks of September 11th and subsequent events is that multiculturalism has sapped our will to fight back and thus to survive," said James Bowman -- American editor of The Times Literary Supplement and author of Honor: A History -- in a recent NRO interview with Christina Hoff Sommers, putting his finger on exactly what's wrong with our "nuanced" fellow citizens of the left who've lost their nerve and dare not call a spade a spade:

If American patriotism has to be expressed at the expense of non-Americans, even non-Americans who want to kill us simply for being Americans, we are ashamed to express it.

The offending remarks that the president now professes to regret were calculated for their effect on the enemy, but their collateral effect was deeply to offend the media.

Now he says that "I think in certain parts of the world it was misinterpreted." What he doesn't say is that the main parts of the world where it was misinterpreted were New York and Washington and London [Don't you LOVE it?], where the educated elites think such remarks encouraged the insurgency in Iraq.

But in the Arab honor culture, they were much likelier to have been interpreted, correctly, as a warning and an assurance of U.S. resolve. Mr. Bush's kind of masculine vaunting behavior had to have been well understood as part of the age-old rituals of fighting. Like a boxer making the "come here" gesture in the ring, Mr. Bush was saying in effect: "I'm not afraid of you. Hit me with your best shot and I'll still defeat you."

When an honor culture breaks down, honor itself doesn’t simply cease to exist. Rather it is transmuted into other forms, though forms which are mostly useless in terms of their survival value. One such alternative to traditional honor culture is to be found in the exaltation of victimhood . . . the decline of traditional honor proceeds pari passu with the loss of national identity and finally even the will to survive as an identifiable people distinct from those who would destroy that identity.

To deflate American power and assure themselves a steady supply of oil, European leaders accepted "the traditional cultural baggage of Arab societies, with its anti-Christian and anti-Jewish prejudices and its hostility against Israel and the West." In exchange for markets in the Islamic world, Europe turned its back on its Judeo-Christian heritage and set the stage for its own Islamization.

The point remains, however, that Saddam was unquestionably weaker than U.S. and Western intelligence thought he was and, I believe, that the reason for this misapprehension [about the status of his WMDs] was our failure to understand the imperative of the Arab honor culture, like other honor cultures, to hide weaknesses and wear the mask both of fearlessness and of fearsomeness.

Isn't it interesting that Hezbollah is suddenly willing to talk? After all their huffing and puffing of the last week? Isn't it interesting that Hamas is ready to talk, after all their posturing and certainty of victory? What's happening? I suspect that the leadership of both terrorist organizations are really confused right now.

Every time they behaved this way before, it led to simultaneously enhancing their eternal victimhood, and that, in turn inevitably led -- not to a victory; but it certainly never led to defeat, and it always improved both their status in the world as well as their fortunes.

Doesn't look like that's gonna happen this time. Enough momentum has been generated by the Bush policies in the Middle East to preclude yet another award for victimhood.

TrackBack

» Is This My America? from Wa Salaam
This topic will draw controversy however, there can be no doubt of the truth when the truth is revealed. Time and time again I have weighed the Muslim frustration with Israel (of which there is a lot). I have tried very hard to see both sides of this c... [Read More]

Tracked on August 22, 2006 at 01:00 AM

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

You are "right on" and so is W with his "bring it on." For all of recorded history those who desire to rule others give the world three choices, Do as I say, die, or kill me. So it has always been and so it always will be as long as humans are the planet's dominant species. So-called intellectuals who decry human nature and expect to see it change are in reality poorly educated.

there is little reason, no serious basis, suggesting the Free West has responsibility for the irrational, fascist, self destructive, insecure, machismo, etc., characteristic of the modern Arab Muslim Militant...

'a loss of respect' implies some respect existed prior, or some sane rationale is employed...

I always find it amusing that the left is so inflexible in it's thinking. They insist that the rest of the world thinks just as they do. Who needs to look at actions of another country? Who needs to look at facts? Their thinking runs along the lines of: If "we" are willing to sit down and negotiate, everything will be fine. They don't seem to realize that they've stuck their heads in the sand, but their tails are sticking straight up in the air waiting to be whacked by aggressively hostile nations.

Instead of insisting that America be treated with respect - they turn on other Americans and tell them to hang their heads in shame. It's annoying.