The point was I'm not making these counts up out of thin air , you've been adjusting the count as it did not play out , this count was from September , your primary was $26 in 2014! It's hard to look up your charts on your site but again , you said I was making things up when you clearly had a primary count that meets the discription I have .. You went from mocking expert analysts for 1200 GLD to finally becoming bearish at 1200 . I don't know how you've convinced so many that you've been right this whole time , goes to show the herd mentality is easily manipulated by lawyers . Your site is down by 300 active members , so I'm not wasting my time ...

Sucks when someone knows your actual track record doesn't it? If I was wrong it would be easy to disprove what I say... Facts are that both of your wave 5 targets in never hit in 2013, your upper target truncated in 2014, these are the facts. Give me about 24 hours, I'll have all of your charts ready to go on my instablog and we can systematically go over them together, and yes this is relevant because it would prove that you are deliberately misleading your readers. I can't believe your denying these targets, very telling indeed...

You don't remember that wave 5 to new lows you had back in August of 2013? The wave 4 to $26, and then wave 5 down to about $16. The odd part about your wave 4 is that it was not corrective like a wave 4, it was impulsive, the 6th largest monthly gain in silver history... I can post the charts to my instablog if you like , and according to your methods you say never to trade wave 4's, so the purpose was to short the top of wave 4 to new lows, however your count was caught up in the $21.70 region, and never did make it to the wave 5 target, you then posted another wave 4 target late 2013 early 2014 to $26 followed by a wave 5 down to new lows, but then bailed on the wave 4 target at about $22.50, and recently you've been calling for an immanent crash, and if support does not break then this will prove to be consecutive blunder to the count . Remember , I said I was on your site, your articles do not show your targets, but I have access to all of your charts. Am I getting it right? Do you mind setting the record straight and tell me exactly what your targets were?

EOG Will Continue Its Fast Growth With The Addition Of 4 New Horizontal Development Plays [View article]

Were we not supposed to have a wave 5 down after the last run to $25 ? You then placed another wave 4 target for $26 which did not happen, and wave 5 has yet to happen, so I can see why he is not profitable

For one Avi, your articles puts me , the reader, on defense. I come in with my evidence that your Elliot Wave Theory is not giving you an edge and then instead of actually presenting your case you insult the commenter. So yes its not surprising you have some aggressive commenters following you after being so negative.

This is the part you are not getting, you did not call the top, you noted a resistance point and you cautioned people. However since then your track record has been absolutely dismal, not long after the top you called for a bottom, you were looking for new ATH into the end of 2011, 2012, AND 2013 . This is not a small period to be wrong, your bigger picture view has literally changed 180 degrees in the past few months, and now you are trying to go down as a bearish top caller that has called most of the moves on the way down since 2011, which simply is not true.

I would also like to know where these people are who say you are right 70% of the time, can some readers please testify for Avi's accuracy over 3 years ?