I want to pretend for a few minutes that the current coronavirus pandemic is real. I don’t believe this to be the case. Still, for the purpose of this article, I will temporarily suspend my conspiratorial views and agree with the world health experts. Don’t worry, I have not lost my mind; I assure you there’s a purpose behind this exercise. Everything will become crystal clear for readers by the time they finish reading this post.

As of this writing, there have been 14,315 cases reported in the United States. There are 13, 976 active cases and 13,912 are labeled as mild. The remaining 64 cases are considered serious or critical. This means that 99.54 percent of the cases are mild, and patients will likely make a full recovery in approximately one week.

Serious means a person might need to be hospitalized and have healthcare professionals assist them back to a proper state of health.

327 million people are living in America. Less than 15,000 people have been affected by Covid-19. Granted, the case numbers will continue to increase because more people are regularly being tested. But the numbers trickling in are minuscule when compared to the figures we routinely see in yearly influenza cases.

Why would our government leaders, for all intents and purposes, risk the country’s economic future and prosperity over a viral pandemic that is clearly a minor inconvenience for 99.54 percent of the population?

Even if Covid-19 is a legitimate virus sweeping across the continental USA, it’s not that big of a deal from a statistical standpoint. Currently, there are no vaccines for this illness (Thank God), and the only treatment for viral infections is for people to rest and recover. The human immune system will defeat the coronavirus speedily if left alone, and it’s not suppressed by a plethora of over-the-counter drugs.

If people are locked down, unable to work, and have to maintain social distancing for any lengthy periods, the American and world economies will be destroyed. We’re talking about catastrophic consequences that cannot and will not be repaired in a few weeks, months, or years.

Am I missing something here?

This is a no-brainer from a managerial perspective. You run the country like business as usual. You don’t shut it down and let the economy implode. If people become infected, then so be it. They’ll recover in a week or two at the most. So what, you have a fever and chills for a couple of days. We already can see from other locations in the world and in our own United States that this virus is not a big deal for 99.54 percent of those infected.

This is what makes my conspiratorial mind light up. Something smells rotten in the refrigerator.

What is the ultimate objective of the powers that be with regard to the coronavirus that is getting so much coverage on the national and international mainstream media? Simply put, they want to roll out a new vaccine and sell it to everyone.

In order to accomplish their objective, they have to make it seem like the disease is going to be the end of the world. They want us to believe the coronavirus is more of a threat than it is.

The words Endemic, Epidemic, Pandemic, and Outbreak, are often used interchangeably by government regulatory agencies as well as by the mainstream media companies to purposely mislead citizens about the dangers associated with certain diseases that may or may not be affecting various communities at any given time.

Endemic is the term used to describe a disease that regularly exists in a certain community. For example, measles is supposedly no longer endemic in the United States because there has been an absence of reported, continuous measles transmission cases for 12 months or longer. According to government regulating agencies, the disease is only transmitted in the United States by unvaccinated citizens that visit foreign territories and then bring it back home. These individuals supposedly infect other US citizens that have not been vaccinated.

Epidemic is the term used to describe a disease that has increased its number of reported cases in a community at a rate of one case more than was anticipated by health officials. For example, if a specific community normally expected 5 cases of measles each year based on previously reported health statistics, and suddenly 6 cases were reported, this would be an epidemic.

Pandemic is the term used to describe a situation where several epidemics are being reported throughout a country, in different countries or around the world at the same time.

Outbreak is the term used to describe a disease that has been reported in a community for the very first time or not for several years. Or the cases currently being reported are one case higher than previously reported. For example, if a given community has one case of measles reported in a given year and there are normally no cases reported, this would be an outbreak as well as an epidemic.

The reporting of epidemics and pandemics through media sources are very confusing to the general public. When people hear or read about these terms they often believe that millions of people are being infected with a disease process. Truth be told, the terms epidemic, pandemic, and outbreak are usually referencing only a few cases of a disease process that have recently occurred.

It is vitally important that readers understand the lexicon being used within the public health profession before blindly jumping to conclusions and making poor decisions that might end up harming them in the long run.

The coronavirus, if one exists, is being made to appear more of a problem than it is. If viruses actually spread like the CDC and other regulatory agencies claimed, we’d have all died long ago.

We have been brainwashed by movies and now believe synthetic vaccines are the only solution to resolve the fake plagues being creatively released into society by regulatory agencies that are financially influenced by big pharma.

Goodreads recently interviewed yours truly on the author’s platform about The Target List novel. To read the interview on Goodreads, visit their website by clicking one of the blue links below. Then make sure to follow John Reizer as an author and have a chance to win one of a hundred copies of my novel in The Target List giveaway on Goodreads during the month of August, 2019.

John ReizerMy most recent novel, The Target List was written with the dual intent to entertain its readers while teaching them about the many machinations currently taking place within organized medicine and through its handler, the pharmaceutical industry.

This book delves into a subject that most authors would probably steer away from. But one of the great things about being an indie author is that you have the creative freedom to do what you want.

The Target List is an important book, in my opinion, because it exposes readers to certain truths embedded within a fictional construct that they wouldn’t otherwise be exposed to.

The idea for the book was borne out of my deep desire to educate healthcare consumers about these concepts and to do so through a fictional plot so that readers would actually absorb the material and not be concerned that it was too far removed from the conventional paradigms that have been etched into our collective psyche.

Drug companies would cringe at the thought of having to advertise certain vaccines that have already been forced upon the public. That’s why you never see the Rubella, tDap, chickenpox or Measles vaccines featured in ads like other drugs being pushed on a daily basis.

If the government mandated the public consumption of drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis for precautionary measures do you think big pharma would continue to advertise these products? No!

Can you imagine if the government mandated the taking of antidepressants for everyone because studies found that too many people were depressed and it was causing an epidemic of suicidal behavior in the nation?

Do you think the mandated consumption of antidepressants would infuriate the public? Or would they sit back and roll up their sleeves and get jabbed? Would we see medical cheerleaders posting remarks on social media about what a good idea it was to mandate the public consumption of antidepressants or whatever poison the legal drug cartel wanted to sell?

It’s complete insanity that a governing body can force its citizens to take any drug at any time. All drugs come with serious risks and no one should ever be forced to take any drug without their consent.

Anti-vaxxer – a person who refuses to vaccinate their child because they believe the medication is more dangerous than the benefits they allegedly offer.

Are anti-vaxxers crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists? More important, are anti-vaxxers causing the members of society to become more at risk from dangerous and contagious diseases than they should be? These are both fair questions to explore because a lot of medical experts have been bringing up these questions on national television programs as well as other mainstream media forums.

According to some mainstream medical sources, many diseases are currently returning or making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their children.

First of all let me preface my little article by writing that if vaccines truly conferred immunity to the people receiving them, there would be absolutely no need for the vaccinated patients to fear outbreaks of certain diseases coming from the unvaccinated folks. The only people at risk, theoretically speaking, should be those individuals not vaccinated.

Truth be told, a minority of American healthcare consumers have become a lot more educated in the past 5-10 years and have intelligently concluded that the risks associated with these medicines far out-way the published benefits. This in itself is a scary concept for the drug manufacturers (vaccine makers) who have a financial obligation to their shareholders to make profits. And that is exactly what they have been doing each year. These multinational corporations are making billions of dollars annually while putting out products that are supposedly designed to prevent the spread of diseases. In actuality, the vaccine programs of today have most likely caused the proliferation of many diseases at breakneck speed. More

If you want to absolutely control the outcome of a sports event, you have to control all the players involved on both teams as well as the referees officiating the contest. You leave nothing to chance. You buy off everyone and everything that could possibly prevent you from achieving the results you’re looking for.

This scenario is what’s been happening for years with regards to healthcare in the United States. Big pharmaceutical companies have secured financial control over the media, lawmakers, Congress and everyone else in the game.

If you are naive enough to believe that healthcare regulating agencies are looking out for the public’s best interests, think again. They’ve been bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry. They’re in complete control of everything and there’s not much that anyone can possibly do to reverse the situation except possibly to educate yourself about health and the logic of human physiology. It’s a daunting task, but your life and the lives of your children depend on your efforts. Good luck!