It's becoming more and more obvious that you are reaching the limit of your intelligence in this argument. Please refute what someone has said
rather than making character attacks, generalizations, and suggesting opinion based law.

This is getting kind of laughable and I think many of the posters on this thread agree too. I actually had a great conversation with Hopechest on
another thread. They could actually adfress my points and challenge them with valid counter arguments about the structure of government. I see none
of that here. I think I'm wasting my time.

If driving a Ferrari (within posted speed limits) and shooting a gun (legally) makes one "Happy" and the "Pursuit of Happiness" ("Life, Liberty
and 'the pursuit of happiness'") is a tenet of our Declaration of Independence then, ipso facto, shooting assault styled guns and driving sports
cars is our birthright (even without the rationale of the 2nd Amendment, etc).

I love how the "progressives" are the first ones to tell you that you are reacting out of fear to something and then turn around and use fear to
push their agendas. Guns are not bad they simply are, a object has no right or wrong. From guns, to cars and hey even the internet, all of these
things are only as bad as the people who do bad things with them. Going to a gun range and shooting is not the act of a criminal, it is a exercise in
discipline. Unlike what the ignorant like to think there is more to shooting a gun than pulling the trigger.

Thought so. They haven't been because they are all quite literally fact. Unless you want to counter with opinion. Show me where they have been
refuted legitimately. At the very least participate in the discussion instead of being on your back foot in an argument. haha. I knew it.

I am wasting my time. I'm done here. I hope those who can read and understand have gleaned some benefit from my posts.

That is a very ignorant outlook. That would be like me saying "I hate Toyota Prius drivers because they don't realize that the lifetime carbon
footprint of their car is three times larger than the average automobile because of the manufacturing techniques, I really hate Americans
sometimes".

It's a generalization. Can you define a gun nut please? There's a lot of ignorance, generalizations, and maliciousness coming from your posts.
Don't let the pattern form too strongly.

You must actually believe that people who own firearms have a fantasy about using them against other human beings. It's actually a nightmare. It's
about as exciting as a car crash, and about as tragic, too.

edit on 11-4-2013 by Galvatron because: (no reason given)

Gun owners who fantasize about killing other people are probably as common as seat-belt wearers who fantasize about crashing their car. Or
fire-extinguisher owners who fantasize about their house burning down.

OK, fine. You say a majority of weapons used in gun-related crimes are stolen. bjs.gov... Only 9% of guns used in crimes
are stolen. And stolen from whom? "Responsible" gun owners. Gun owners create a stolen gun market, and stolen guns aren't even the majority of guns
used in crimes.

OK, fine. You say a majority of weapons used in gun-related crimes are stolen. bjs.gov... Only 9% of guns used in crimes
are stolen. And stolen from whom? "Responsible" gun owners. Gun owners create a stolen gun market, and stolen guns aren't even the majority of guns
used in crimes.

Our Government ran guns to Mexican drug cartels. Operation Fast and Furious. And stolen from whom? I wonder, truly.

I never said it was Joe's Ammo Shop hooking up Al Qaeda. The CIA has been trafficking weapons for decades, and it has only caused strife and war in
those regions. Guns are evil, and they have no place in society. People who want guns have no place in society.

I never said it was Joe's Ammo Shop hooking up Al Qaeda. The CIA has been trafficking weapons for decades, and it has only caused strife and war in
those regions. Guns are evil, and they have no place in society. People who want guns have no place in society.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.