IX-01: The teaching of the two Great Snakes from Orient and Occident,
21 seeds for the next age.

IX-02: Restore the Respect as the supreme value.

IX-03: How to Restore the Harmony.

Part 2 - Respect is
the supreme value

"To
teach superstitions as truth is the most terrible thing"
Hypatia

Since the Nov.
18, 2001 you are th
visitor of sens-de-la-vie.com.

French
version.

Respect
is the

First
Value

sens-de-la-vie.com,
reminds us the main things we forgot (Ampéwi
Nunpa)

Free your mind
from the conditioning of all Powers.

As the
Dalai Lama reminds us "Respect is the Supreme Value", but it's 40
generations that westerners have been cultivating Disrespect about
anything -and anyone- that is not "Them"; and the worst point is
that they are proud to behave disrespectfully.

Who said: "White Men
are the disease of the world"?

Not content
with being manipulated like livestock, westerners scorn
everything! And it's this attitude that destroys the world:
animals, plants, the whole environment, Primitive People, and all
the heart qualities in yourself; because scorning the others leads
to the disrespect of oneself.

Which implies
that in a short time, this disrespect for everything -at an
extreme point- will destroy humanity. As the Sanskrit proverb
says:

" When the man
kills the Dharma, the Dharma kills the man."

What is Respect ?

The word "respect"
comes from the Latin word respectus
which means "consideration": "Let's
hit, no respect must hold you back"
[Racine].

Nowadays it means: a
feeling of esteem, mixed with a feeling of veneration that
leads to a respectful or submissive attitude towards someone or
something: respect one's parents, or one's masters.

The expressions -"human
respect", "fear of the public opinion", "fear of mockery or of
gossips"- that influence one's behaviour:

"He did not dare to protest, held back by human
respect".

"With all due respect", is
used to introduce a sentence that could shock the person you
are speaking to

"To command with respect":
which means to hold back someone by force, or scare this
person.

Taking care of not
damaging someone or something we consider that deserves
consideration: "respect
for old stones should be urbanists' first concern" .

We also consider this
point of view: " We
can also think that to respect = re-spectare = which means
"look twice". In other words do not be content with the first
look; look twice. Do not believe that you have understood
everything at the first look. You do not respect because you do
not look and you do not see, whereas you think that you've seen
and understood everything."Olivier Clerc, see
the page of links

It is obvious that the center point of each real civilization
should focus on the education of the youth about Respect,
because everything is linked. Therefore, when we harm somebody
by lack of respect, we also harm ourselves and the whole
community.

Emmanuel
Kant

This lack of respect takes its roots from ancient
times:

Emmanuel
KANT (1724-1804) said these reasonable words:

« The duty
to respect my fellow is contained in the maxim that says to
not lower another human until the point where he would only
become a means to my end (do not require that the other
gives himself up to become a means to my end).»

But this
"great philosopher" and nevertheless perfect idiot, appearing
in all school textbooks, also wrote:

« We only can respect people, but we can't respect
things. We can have a feeling of inclination towards things,
and even love for animals [...], or a feeling of
fear, of the sea, a volcano, a dangerous animal, but no
respect. »

Now,
this is your fundamental mistake! Because the concept of
"the other" must include all the things that are alive
and/or interactive with us. All these things, I mean: air,
water, soil, ground and any other forms of life of any
kingdom: mineral, vegetal and animal including humans who
are a part of the last-mentioned. How is it possible to not
be consicous that when you dirty our mother-Earth, you also
dirty yourselves? Since your body come from her! F.Y.I.

How is it possible
?

Contemporary western societies praise disrespect; Are you all
nuts?

For
example Jean-Michel Besnier, graduated of philosophy and doctor
of State in political science, who "teaches" at the
Compiègne University and at the École Centrale of
Paris, wrote this article concerning Georges Bataille :
"Praise of
disrespect"

Extract:

"Nowadays, we
don't know what we should respect. Respect of the Human
Rights, who would complain? Respect of the animals, but they
suffer like us. Respect of the Earth, the ecosystem lives
too, the same as any other organism. Respect of the
non-smokers, of the embryos, of the past, of the religious
convictions, of the women, of the traffic regulations. Too
bad! if we lose in understanding what we win in extension;
as would say the logicians and that Kant would refuse, him
who did not have a generous respect since he only had
respect for the subjects of the moral law."

In other
words, the author complains that there are too many things to
respect, and emphasizes on this to mock respect.

Here is an
example of another "teacher" that will show you that idiots can
accept anything:

"When I know a
young person for a more or less period of time and that this
young person continuously disrespects me, I think that I
should look at what I did for this happens, especially if
this frequently happens to me. Respect is like trust; it
takes time to acquire it. What I mean is that it's may be
possible that my own behaviours bring about disrespect, even
if the young person is responsible for his own behaviour.
First of all, adults have to behave like adults, and I do
not see a lot of them who want to accept that they are
wrong, or partly wrong. If each adult were behaving as an
educator (and it's the case in the so-called "primitive"
people... ), and if everyone was feeling responsible to the
society, I think that there would be less young people in
trouble."

The teacher who feels
guilty: http://www.antredudragon.com/actu2.html

She "thinks"
and feel guilty where she should simply assert herself by the
dignity of her behaviour, and if necessary by
punishment.

Pôooorof Us !

....
to whom do we give our children to look
after?

If
some people fail in their duty, a higher hierarchy must judge
them, and possibly punish them; but certainly not the
subordinates. It's advisable to point out that in the case of a
teacher making a mistake towards his/her students, they have no
right to disrespect their teacher. They can inform their
parents who will venture to complain or not.

This
argument is valid for any harmonious hierarchic system
because,

Respect is due to the
Function that represents a precise ideal,

before being to the people
who perform this function.

This
respect due to the function must be seen as the respect of an
ideal of just and clearly defined principles, that are the
duties peculiar to this function.

Concerning
schools, if the person who performs the function of teacher
behaves wrongly regarding to his/her function, this person has
to be punished or dismissed immediately. And the students have
no right to disrespect this teacher until he/she still performs
his/her function, because if the function's ideal is tarnished
with disrespect, students may expand their disrespect to all
the teachers, even them who perform their function
perfectly.

Respect of the
function does not mean an absolute duty of
obedience.

Example:
during the war between Algeria and France in 1961, my platoon
was operating at El Gor in the South of Oran province,
territory of the Al-Anghad tribe *
in the south of Géryville.

* Nota : The Al-Anghad
was a tribe of 2.500 nomad people (dromedaries, donkeys and
sheeps breeders) who have been arbitrarily fixed on the
Algerian side by the colonization. They became sedentary by
force on a very small territory because of this war. The first
wife of Abd El Khader was coming from the Al-Anghad
tribe.

The Al-Anghads
were not allowed to enter the forbidden zone, but the French
army confined them into a so small territory, that was too
small for their herd, that their animals died of famine: 30.000
to 3.000 heads. So that the shepherds were making the herd
graze in the forbidden zone to avoid losing more animals: and
French soldiers had the right to kill anybody in this zone.
It's in these circumstances that we saw 2 young Al-Anghad
shepherds from El Gor, aged 5 and 8. I was surprised when the
lieutenant gave the order to the soldier in charge of the
machinegun to prepare to shoot the 2 children. How is it
possible that a man behaves this way?

I instantly
put my Mat 49 (gun) on the Lieutenant's head, bullet engaged in
the barrel. My action amazed everybody and stopped the deadly
process. Then I told the Lieutenant, firmly but politely:

"My
Lieutenant, with all due respect, I will have to kill
you to avoid the murder of these children".

As he
understood that I was not joking, he told to the machinegun man
to withdraw and appointed two soldiers to take these two
children -and their herd- back home and alive; this sad story
finally had a happy ending as there were no repression on the
families. Regarding military Laws, I was liable to the death
sentence for my rebellion. The Lieutenant threatened me with
the court-martial, but he finally did not do anything against
me. Happy ending for everybody. By my behaviour I respected the
function symbolized by his uniform, while I was determined to
kill the man who was disgracing his uniform.

This
short story is to show you that it's possible to respect the
function,

while
disobeying the man who performs it,

because
respect is, at first, due to Life, of any
kind.

Concerning my own experience, I live in Thailand and I can
assert you that the youth of the country are taught the
Buddhist philosophy since they are very young. That is, more
than any other value, respect of their parents, respect of
their masters/teachers, respect of the King, and respect of
Life. Here, it is a pleasure to see schools, cleanliness,
kindness of all and a mutual respect between humans.

On the other
hand, I think that encouraging disrespect -like you do in western
countries- is a social suicide.

Snapshot on Corsica

I love Corsica, which
is one of the most beautiful places in the world, as well as
Corsican because they are upright people; and I have a lot of
Corsican real friends. Anyway, you only can have a real Corsican
friend or a true Corsican enemy. In the second case, the person
who made the mistake to have a true Corsican enemy should better
escape the island to live on another planet if he doesn't want to
get in serious trouble! Cesar the great, who observed the
excellent warlike worth of these Men, said: ''
The best riches in Corsica are its
inhabitants''. But
in the other hand, the one who found a real Corsican friend cannot
find in his/her whole life a more loyal, dedicated and courageous
friend! (Find out about Napoleon's Corsican guardsmen!)

One of my Corsican friends
told me:'' What the pinzuttis do not understand is that in Corsica,
the Law is very clear and simple and has only one article:
"whoever do not respect the others, will be executed with no
anger, no hate and no pain."

Nota
: The "Head of Maure" comes originally from Aragon. At
the middle age, this head was on the standards of the
kings of Aragon who were fighting against the Sarazins.
This head was symbolizing a Sarazin king defeated during
the Crusades. At this time, the "Head of Maure" was
blindfolded, because in 1297, Corsica and Sardinia were
given by the Pope to the King of Aragon. On the Corsican
flag, the blindfold on the eyes -which is a symbol of
slavery- has been raised on the forehead by Pascal Paoli
to symbolize the liberation of the country, according to
the historian Paul Arrighi. A
bandera testa mora (Head
of Maure flag) was declared Corsica's official emblem at
the time of the Corti Consult on November 24,
1762.

Corsica has always had a
lot of famous admirers. Stendhal who, everyone knows, was in
love with stupidity and human aggressiveness, wrote in his book
"Memoires sur Napoleaon": "In
Corsica, the admirable Law of the gunshot, makes that
politeness prevails". Voltaire
wrote on November 18, 1768: ''The
whole Europe is Corsican'',
and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his book "le Contrat Social"
said:''If there
is still a country able to legislate in Europe, it's Corsica
island ''.

Pascal
Paoli (seen by Goscinny and Uderzo)

(Great Corsican
Leader and, one of those who inspired the United States of
America's Constitution and the women's right to
vote)

While the numerous
fights between Corsican and Italians, my ancestors, the latest
learnt very quickly that their subjects deserved their
reputation of " the
most dangerous warriors of Europe''.
The Corsicans of this age called the dagger they permanently
wore at their belt, the ''
porta rispettu''
(translation: respect-holder !). Corsicans are prompted by a
superhuman determination: is there on this earth another human,
other than a Corsican, able to start a military career as a
Corporal and finish it by being sacred Emperor by the Pope,
after having established the basis of the modern world for
several centuries?

Corsican have a
peculiarity that makes them different from other People: they
are a mix of the American Indians and the Samurais spirits.
American Indians, concerning the superhuman RESPECT they have
for their island: they are conscious that they have been shaped
by their island. And the Samurais, concerning their swords:
they know that their dagger is their ONLY friend that will
never betray them and will never turn against them!

Above all, Respect is a duty but not a right:

It
is obvious that we can't be respected if we do not respect
anyone, as well as if we are not able to be respected by the
use of authority.

It's not an
innate "right", or if you prefer we can acquire this right by
the respect we have of the others or of anything. We also can
acquire this right by the ability we have to impose
it...

And a man who
respects the others, respect himself too; because he knows that
his behaviour is in harmony with the Highest Human Values! And:
'' one
respects a man who respects himself
''.

( H. de Balzac
). F.Y.I.

This seems
to be something that everyone forgets.

Here is an authentic human's opinion about Respect:

" The
principal standards of human ways of thinking can be
classified regarding the attitude they have towards life and
the world. This attitude fluctuates between acceptance and
denial.

If we say "yes" to
life and the world, then the existence is a value in itself
that we have to raise to its perfection, which requires an
active dedication towards things/people
alive.

If we say "no",
the outside world is of no interest, life becomes a stupid
game with no aim, which is a matter to refuse, without
trying to improve the lot of things/people alive.
"Théodore
Monod

BUT...

In the speech
he gave on December 11, 1968, when he was rewarded the Nobel
Prize for Peace, Rene Cassin presented the Universal
Declaration of the Human Rights as
"the first
ethic manifesto that organized humanity has ever adopted".

Now, 34 years
after the adoption of this Declaration by UN's general
Assembly, the medical profession, which duty is to help sick
people and the society regarding the Child Care Service -Paris
Hospitals-, just begin to observe that:

" It has to pay
homage to this decisive text. Daily realities in our
institution invest us with exceptional human
responsibilities. Answering, by action and in a constant
commitment, to the strongest needs a man expresses to
another man, is to understand the value and the moral
meaning of the "rights" that humans deserve".

In other
words, they just started to understand in 2002, that they had
to take account of human dignity, in the relationship between
medical personnel and sick people. Will they do it? That's
another question.

When will you
understand? In a thousand years???

Taboo
Reflections:

Fundamental
aspect of the disrespect of the Man towards the Woman:

The
first and the most fundamental respect should be the respect
due to the Woman, because the People come from women. And
that's why the
very ancient harmonious societies
were matriarchal. The American Indians said that:
"Women are
the root of the people, and if the root rots, the whole plant
will rot ".
After the long period of peace of the matriarchal societies,
these ones, under the influence of the Jewish religions toppled
to patriarchal societies that are the source of the actual
disharmonies. At the present time, the worst disrespect is
committed, in nearly every People and for different reasons, by
men towards women they live with -for the most of the time
brutally and with corporal brutality. Not to mention little
girls who are often, and for ages, sexual victims of their
fathers, uncles, brothers, etc... If this situation could
sincerely improve, everything would change on this planet and
harmony would win, because: ''the
Woman is ray of GODl'' (
Rûmi ).

Only
the respect towards women generates harmonious humans, because born
and educated in good conditions.

Sexual
aspect of the disrespect of the children by the religious in
charge of their "education":

The
second most fundamental respect should be the one due to
Children. Now a lot of religious sexually abuse children. In
India, there is still a religious ritual where young girls,
sometimes aged only 12, are offered by their families to the
local temples for a blessing ceremony where they are rapped,
and then they enter at the sexual service of the Hindu priests:
these girls are called the "devadasis". In the western world,
and in the Third-World, it's worst: it's been 2000 years that
priests sodomize and rape children. And it is not a minority:
in the USA, 60% of the catholic dioceses are touched with this
phenomenon. All the countries are concerned: rapes of
indigenous children are practices everywhere, from American
Indians to Australian Aborigines. We can imagine that religious
took care of the Education for centuries, to have ''handy''
children more easily! Humans are now starting to become
conscious that they are ALL, or nearly all, descendants of
raped children! And they are now feeling very bad with this
2000-year old worldwide slavery performed by an assembly, for
the main part, of homosexual-pedophiles!

The worldwide awakening will start with young people who will
reject all these satanic religions.

Slavery
is one of them, if not the first of all. It's 15 years that the
number of women and children kidnapped and sold is rising.
According to a recent report, between 700.000 and 4 million
people in the world would suffer someone else's tyranny.

Slave trader: a job with future prospects!

This
report on slavery in the world recently published by the
American state department is the second one and only the second
one of its kind. The fact, that nobody made sutdies on this
phenomenon before, shows the indifference and the helplessness
of most of the important governments. And the revival of one of
the worst scourge of the so-called humanity is not new.
Everybody knows that the children submission by force to the
goods production has been increasing as the legislations for
workers are blowing up. And everybody knows that the submission
of young girls to be sexually abused have been spreading very
quickly just after the Berlin Wall was destroyed. In short, the
most odious traffic is booming since 15 years.

Amazingly,
it's only in 2000 that the Protocol under the UN, to prevent,
suppress and punish the traffic of people, was adopted. Today,
104 nations have signed this treaty that plans the application
of sanctions towards the countries that did not adopt a
suitable legislation.

In other words, 82
countries absolutely don't care of this Protocol, whereas it is
pressing to observe some rules, since the International Labour
Organization asserts that there are 4 million of slaves in the
world. Amongst these 82 countries, 19 of them come with
terrible outcomes -most of them are Muslims-, according to the
report of the State department together with many worldwide
NGOs.

"Before giving
more details about some vices, we have to mention some
important aspects: the cogs. The slavery process is
subdivided in 3 sequences. The supplier-countries, nations
that turn a blind eye to those who kidnap the nationals; a
notable country is ethiopia. Then the countries where
nothing is done to slow down the process of slave
trafficking; examples: Mexico and Hungary. And finally
the countries that receive slaves and do nothing to prevent
their exploitation; Petroleum monarchies of the Persian Gulf
(U.A.E.) are the champions in their category. We must add
that many countries gather these three cogs; for example:
the Sudan.

In this country,
hundreds of Ugandans kidnapped by rebel groups are sexual
and domestic slaves; they even sometimes use Ugandans
children as soldiers. Hundreds of Sudanese are sold as
slaves to Libya and Chad. Worst, government authorities have
barter with armed militias: in exchange of a military
support from militias, the authorities turn a blind eye to
their slave traffic.

In Saudi Arabia, it's
no use prohibiting slavery since 1962 -in 1962 only!-,
things haven't changed. There are no laws that specifically
criminalize this traffic. More shocking, a wide range of
jobs are not included in the convention, out of contract and
out of legislation. More precisely, jobs concerning farming,
transports and more are not regulated. Finally, concerning
the victims' protection, Saudi Arabia is one of the most
unworthy in the world.

In Russia, where this
phenomenon shows a different aspect than Saudi Arabia,
traffic is essentially sexual. Russia is supplier-country
where the recruitment for prostitution is highly favoured,
simply because it's not criminalized. Here like in many
other countries, the traffickers take advantage because
there are no legislation concerning the matter; and the
investment in this activity is cheaper than the investment
for drug traffic.

http://www.ledevoir.com/2002/06/10/2837.html

Millions
of people are slaves, and such an abject situation is
tolerated!

Social
aspect of the disrespect of the Man by the Man:

At the
present time, disrespect prevails as a king everywhere,
arrogant and sure of its strength -even inside schools and
other education institutes-; disrespect mainly attacks weak
people: children, women and the elders because they can't
protect themselves from violence (physical or oral). The
under-humans who perpetrate these disrespectful and aggressive
attitudes towards weaker people will never give up if one try
to persuade them or with beautiful speech: they openly don't
give a shit.

The
only way to impose them RESPECT is the fear of a Just,
Relentless and Quick Force.

It works! I
saw it in the country where I live: young gangster from French
suburbs tried to behave like if they were in France, as they
were tourists in Thailand. The efficiency of the Thais and Thai
police was instantaneous. Verbally offending or physically
aggressing a Thai national result in the expulsion of the
country and/or imprisonment, or worst -very often- immediate
death.

From now on,
young gangsters know how it works here; and Miracle! There is
no more problem.

Commercial
aspect of urging disrespect, as a selling technique:

Example:
Two TV Commercials:

1. Two
teenagers (a boy and a girl) are at the movies. The boy leans
forwards the girl like if he was going to kiss her, but he just
stole her lemonade. He's proud of himself: he simulated an
affectionate intercourse to steal the girl's drink. Bingo, what
a smart boy! All youngsters are invited to do like him.

2. A teenager
(female) locked herself in a bathroom with a pack of cookies.
The rest of the family knocks at the door. We can see her
eating the whole pack of cookies, alone. And she only opens the
door when the pack is empty. The slogan is: " XXXXXX, it's good
to share."

These kinds of
very frequent commercials are the triumph of disrespect,
rudeness and selfishness: and everyone thinks that is
normal!

The
genocide aspect of human disrespect to make profit:

This is the
reconstruction of the torture of an Amazonian Indian, the
only survivor of a tribe that was exterminated by
adventurers. The woman was hanged by the feet and cut in two
parts lengthwise. This kind of event is frequent in Sylvia,
but generally nobody talk about them. " Le massacre des
Indiens " by Lucien Bodard, Publisher: Le Cercle du Nouveau
Livre d'Histoire.

This picture
was taken in the 60's-70's, but this past is not
past.

Explanation:

The
Amazon forest is rich of multiple natural resources and the
Brazilian law, to protect Indians, says that no mine working,
wood working or any other natural resources is allowed on any
of the territories populated by Indians. Whatever can be the
request, a study must be previously done to determine if the
territory is populated by Indian villages or not.

Consequently,
some "ill-intentioned" companies pay gunmen to exterminate one
or many villages and erase all traces of the villagers -what is
a natural process in a forest. When the job is done, these
companies request for their authorization to exploit the
territory. The government study mission reports that there are
no Indians in the area, and the company gets the authorization.
F.Y.I.

And there is
more: American scientists used Indians as Guinea pigs. The
American Anthropological Association denounced that American
scientists would have kill hundreds of Indians for their
experiments!

Disrespect
prevails as a king everywhere, arrogant and sure of its
strength in the economic spheres until the States level.

Unique
example:

" France shows
one more time that it really doesn't care about our
Mother-Earth, since in 1999 the country threw 375.000 tons
of nitrate in the Atlantic Ocean; which is twice more than
in 1985 (200.000 tons), violating the international
agreements. According to the OSPAR agreements, France should
have reduced of 50% its toxic garbage between 1985 and
1995..."

Authentic
Humans respect everything, even a tree or a rock, because they
know that it takes a long reflection before allowing oneself to
cut one tree, or to dig a hole in the ground. Now at the rate
of the disrespectful devastation of the Earth, it will not
remain any primitive forest within only 20 years; and humans
will follow shortly after.

As there is no
physical force able to stop the devastation, the only solution
is to impose a force by our consumer behaviours.

The
solution is to stop to buy any product coming from the
devastation of the Earth.

If people
completely stop to buy tropical woods it will slow down the cuts,
won't it?

Other
aspects of disrespect:

It's
impossible to do an exhaustive inventory of the damages due to
disrespect: they are too important. The damages start with the
contemporary religious wars, the recent slaughter of an old man
whose house was burnt for fun, slaughterhouses, to children
sold to pedophile networks, et...

There is one
example that nobody knows: the disrespect of the Earth -that
directly led to desert expansion, devastations of forests,
industrial accidents, and indirectly natural disasters -that
forced 25 million people to escape ecological
tragedies.

Theorically, they do not
exist.

25
millions of ecological refugees.

by
Marina Julienne

"Theorically,
they do not exist.
Anyway they don't have the status of «refugees»
that is reserved, according to the Geneva Convention, to
those who must leave their country because of persecutions
related to their race, religion, nationality or their
political opinions. Without the recognition of the refugee
status, they can't hope any help from the international
community.

Nevertheless in 1998,
they were more than 25 million of «eco-refugees»
in the world, a figure higher than those who escaped a
conflict (23 million), according to the report of the UN
Funds for population in 2001.

These people leave
their houses, and sometimes their countries due to natural
disasters... et due to the men too: Chernobyl's radioactive
clouds, flooding near the Trois Gorge Dam in China, the
forecasted submerging of Tuvalu archipelago in Polynesia,
the expansion of the desert of Shale, etc...

The phenomenon of
these eco-refugees is not new. Tens of thousands people had
to leave the desert of Shale during the big drought in the
70's. According to Veronique Lassailly Jacob, Geographer at
the Science Research National Center in France,
«In 1964, 80.000 people were forced to leave the region
because of the construction of the Akosombo Dam in Ghana,
and 100.000 Nubians and Sudanese because of the construction
of the Assouan Dam in Egypt».

For each eruption of
volcano and each tidal wave, people escape their lands and
their houses... And the combination of multiple factors such
as the lack of resources, the destruction of the environment
and the demographic growth will surely increase the
movements of population. « How can you make the
difference between someone who escapes poverty and someone
who escapes the deterioration of the environment? »
asks Hervé Domenach, Director of Research at the
Population-Environment Laboratory from the Development
Research Institute.

And how can we
estimate that an ecological disaster -flooding or fires- is
due to the men or the nature? A lot of cases, nevertheless
reported by media, are litigious.

That's why next
year New Zealand will receive «climatic exiles »
from the Tuvalu Islands.

11.000 people will
have to escape these 26 Km sq. that will be submerged soon,
because of the climate warming and the water
rise.

And the same thing may
happen to the Maldives Islands: but this time 300.000 people
will have to find a refuge. Can we talk about natural disaster?
Or are these the effects of a climatic change of which the
international community is responsible? In this case, will they
have a refugee status and get some help?

Because they are not
considered as « ecological refugees », some of them
take shelter under the political refugee etiquette to escape
poverty.« in 1992, explains Véronique Lassailly
Jacob, thousands of people escaped drought in Mozambique to
Zambia, that was happy to welcome a huge number of refugees, to
get an important international help. In this country, refugees
where not living in camps but on farming lands, where they were
working as farmers: they could get benefit from the production
but had only the right of use the land.» Everybody got his
part of the cake. After drought, the refugees went back home
without waiting the official repatriations."

You can read the
integral text in the Québec Science magazine.

No good
will come of waiting:

Respect takes its roots in the love that the Man have for
the Universal and the understanding of the states of mind
different from ours.

Respect must dwell on everything that is the Earth itself,
and to all the forms of life it gave birth to.

Respect must be the central value in the education of the
youth, with alive symbols that are at first, respectful
greetings to the elders and the masters, as well as a polite
attitude and a proper outfit. The opposite is nothing else
than an indirect aggression to other people.

Respect must be strengthen by Force to impose to proud and
rebellious people who try to exist socially through
aggressiveness and impolite acts, or to get richer to the
detriment of all. When I say Force I mean public Force as
well as moral individual force to confront an opponent
stronger than oneself. Do not confuse aggressiveness and
violence.

Conclusion on a
World of Harmony:

We must found a
society with no aggressiveness in human relationships,

because, founded on
the education of Respect since the early childhood:

A Harmonious
Society.

But
" the man
being bad from birth"(Genesis)
according to the Holy Fable. To give birth to a Harmonious and
durable society, there must be a Force in the bosom of it -in
addition of the education- that suppress the aggressiveness and
disrespect of the others, and if necessary with an appropriated
and efficient violence.

The
need of this Force, and its individual Right, must be
acknowledged.

If this
couple, Education complemented with Force and this Right does not
exist, aggressiveness spreads with no limits. And this is exactly
what's happening in our western societies that supposedly respect
the "human rights"; in this case, the man is the aggressor,
because the weak victim has no right.

Understand
that:

To stigmatize the Force as the Absolute Principle is an utopia
that leads to the development of aggressiveness with no limit
because it does not have any obstacle: this is what we can see
in our daily life.

A human
that is fully aroused is an Ocean of Peace inside himself,
because there is no aggressiveness in him towards the other
people. Some people would say that he is a "good" man, but he
also has inside himself the sword of the sharpest
violence.

Didn't
Jesus chase away with violence the traders of the temple?

...According to
the Holy Fable.

Here
is what happens when a man is freed from psychical
implants:

He just
becomes Himself.

Which
means a force similar to those from natural energies,
because

this
man doesn't know the fear and has no personal
intentions.

His
actions emanate from him the same as the heat emanate from
fire; it's exactly like fire itself: it has no personal
intention such as lighting, heating or
destroying.

The child gets too
near of the fire, burns himself, and then says "fire is
malicious".

Fire is neither good
nor bad because these words DON'T MAKE SENS. Fire is, and that's
all.

WE have to learn how
to use it, and depending on our intelligence fire will destroy
us,

or it can heat us if
we find how to use it.

The
behaviour of a real human, freed, is identical to the fire:
spontaneous. "he" doesn't "think", does not want anything and
fears NOTHING. As a result, seen from outside, people do not
understand his attitude that they sometimes can perceive as
violent.

To finish,
there is a thought process that aims to exit this world's
dimension: this is the case of Buddhism. And this process does
not apply by principle to the eradication of violence in the
world (which is by nature very difficult), but tries to set up
a perfect harmony inside ourselves: which obviously implies, at
first, a total absence of aggressiveness.

By eliminating
the aggressiveness in ourselves, we will considerably reduce
aggressiveness in the world -of which we are a part- and so
reduce crime! F.Y.I.

But they only
will be definitely abolished the Day that each soul, by taking
control, will make of its body a MAN or a WOMAN, because: ''the
Man is only the shadow of THE MAN, and THE MAN is only the
shadow of a Christ'' ( âme de Raphaël c 1, p 5
).

Here is an
excellent example from the book of the Dalai Lama:
'' Le
Dalaï lama parle de Jésus-Christ".

During a
conference gathering many representatives of different
religions, a Christian monk asked the Dalai Lama:
''Is it
possible to be violent by compassion? ''

And the Dalai
Lama answered :

''
Yes, in some cases. But it's violence with no hate and
suffering. Siddharta himself turned to it in one of his
previous embodiment where he was a trader. At this time, he
had to take a ferry boat to cross a river. When he
recognized one of the ferry boat employee as a wanted
killer, and as he could read in the killer's thoughts he
realized that the guy had took the decision to kill all the
passengers to steal them. Therefore he killed the wanted
killer to avoid him to suffer the karma of this bad action
in his next re-embodiment ".

Stories of
Buddha's former lives, called the Jakatâs, of which this
anecdote, were the basis of his teaching until he died when he
was 80.

Aggressiveness
is a (negative) behaviour, whereas violence is an (positive)
Energy.

Do you understand
me?

Conclusion:

''Self control
generates Respect, Respect generates Order, Order generates
Harmony, andHarmony
has the power to End any forms of evil''
(Raphaël).

by Bev.

Sens-de-la-vie.com,
the little website that will never let itself be crushed by the
masters of the world, tells you: we have to re-conquer our own
humanity, which obviously implies to RESPECT every form of
life: we need to become conscious of the Sacred that is present
EVERYWHERE.

Left: Miss Paem
and Miss Lane, two young high school students of my family,
educated like all Thai youngsters: on the basis of
Respect.

Like Thais do, we should
found a society with no aggressiveness between humans, because
founded since the early childhood on the education of respect of
the others, based on the philosophy of Respectful relations, at
the opposite of the one we know since several centuries, at the
origin of suffering: relation of force!

This is the only
attitude to end aggressiveness and the destruction of our
planet.