This happened during a Presidential election where Romney was apparently heading to a certain loss after the Dems' convention was much better received by the public than the earlier GOP convention.

999 times out of a thousand, our country rallies together when enemies attack and kill Americans serving their country. However, in these times, that did not apply because GOP and FoxNews saw an opportunity to try to get Romney off the mat in the Presidential election.

So they looked for every opportunity to try to use the event to their advantage, and the first thing they seized upon was the relatively minor mistake of what somebody said on TV a few days later.

The things worthy of criticism, not preventing the attack and not having assets available to repel the attack, were lower priority for the GOP opportunists.

By the time more facts came to light, most Americans were disgusted by the GOP and FoxNews trying to use the deaths of 4 Americans to revive their losing Presidential candidate.

It was pretty obvious that the GOP was trying to exploit the deaths from the attack to win an election.

I just hope that the GOP keeps trying to exploit this as if this was the first time in history that terrorists killed Americans.

The only thing unique about Benghazi is that it was the first time that one political party tried their darndest to nakedly forget that you are supposed to put the United States of America ahead of political party when the topic is serious.

This happened during a Presidential election where Romney was apparently heading to a certain loss after the Dems' convention was much better received by the public than the earlier GOP convention.

999 times out of a thousand, our country rallies together when enemies attack and kill Americans serving their country. However, in these times, that did not apply because GOP and FoxNews saw an opportunity to try to get Romney off the mat in the Presidential election.

So they looked for every opportunity to try to use the event to their advantage, and the first thing they seized upon was the relatively minor mistake of what somebody said on TV a few days later.

The things worthy of criticism, not preventing the attack and not having assets available to repel the attack, were lower priority for the GOP opportunists.

By the time more facts came to light, most Americans were disgusted by the GOP and FoxNews trying to use the deaths of 4 Americans to revive their losing Presidential candidate.

It was pretty obvious that the GOP was trying to exploit the deaths from the attack to win an election.

I just hope that the GOP keeps trying to exploit this as if this was the first time in history that terrorists killed Americans.

The only thing unique about Benghazi is that it was the first time that one political party tried their darndest to nakedly forget that you are supposed to put the United States of America ahead of political party when the topic is serious.

It wasn't a mistake, it was an intentional lie.

__________________

"I'll see you guys in New York." ISIS Caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to US military personnel upon his release from US custody at Camp Bucca in Iraq during Obama's first year in office.

Do you think somebody did something in reliance on believing in the truth of this "intentional lie"?

Is there anybody anywhere that can say that he was planning on doing X but because Susan Rice appeared on TV and said Y that he did Z instead of X?

Our people died because some terrorist attacks result in deaths to the good guys. The bottom line is the bottom line and Susan Rice going on TV was inconsequential as an "intentional lie" because nobody on Earth took any action in reliance on believing it.

The only reason it had any consequnce at all, is that it inspired an overreaction amongst the right-wing who thought Benghazi was their tool to get Romney back in the game. They spilled all this ink and outrage over Susan Rice and they lost credibility over any proper criticisms that could be made after more was known.

Do you think somebody did something in reliance on believing in the truth of this "intentional lie"?

Is there anybody anywhere that can say that he was planning on doing X but because Susan Rice appeared on TV and said Y that he did Z instead of X?

Our people died because some terrorist attacks result in deaths to the good guys. The bottom line is the bottom line and Susan Rice going on TV was inconsequential as an "intentional lie" because nobody on Earth took any action in reliance on believing it.

The only reason it had any consequnce at all, is that it inspired an overreaction amongst the right-wing who thought Benghazi was their tool to get Romney back in the game. They spilled all this ink and outrage over Susan Rice that they lost credibility over any proper criticisms that could be made after more was known.

There must have been a reason that the administration conspired to tell such a blatant lie. Hmmm, I wonder what it was.

__________________

"I'll see you guys in New York." ISIS Caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to US military personnel upon his release from US custody at Camp Bucca in Iraq during Obama's first year in office.

This happened during a Presidential election where Romney was apparently heading to a certain loss after the Dems' convention was much better received by the public than the earlier GOP convention.

Stopped reading right there since you are already talking out of your ass. If Romney didn't **** up the last debate taking the "don't be aggressive approach" the RINOs were recommending, there's a damned good chance the worse President in US history would not have been re-elected.

Facts are, not only was help not sent, but a stand down order was given twice and word is, only one person could have given such an order. John Stewart and his libtard pals are sucking their thumbs and twisting their hair, repeating to themselves "this isn't as bad as Iran or anything else, no it's not, it's really not!" Its the Kerry "I have a plan" plan, where you simply repeat something over & over and hope it finally makes it true ( or at least idiots start to believe it ).

This happened during a Presidential election
So they looked for every opportunity to cover up the the event to maintain their advantage,

By the time more facts came to light, most Americans either didn't care or never heard them because FoxNews was the only network interested in the deaths of 4 Americans and why the administration lied about what happened and Interfered with the investigation

It was pretty obvious that the Democrats were willing to do anything to win an election.

The only thing unique about Benghazi is that it was the first time that a cover-up was so poorly executed that it was obvious almost immediately but, neither the media nor most of the American people cared. .

So they removed reference to the CIA warnings leading up to the attack and any mention of terrorists, per Nuland's repeated demands and, quote, "my buildings leadership”. And Carney still says this contradicts nothing that was reported!? HTF does he look himself in the mirror?