HOW PATRIARCHY WORKS – THE WORLD OF DEMONS
SATAN RULES THE WORLD, & HE WORKS THROUGH MEN

* Secret Conspiracy by Banksters to Create Global Currency
* Who Caused the Boston Marathon Murders?
* Food dumped while people & animals starved
* New disciple has dreams of being chosen by Rasa/God

The Tower of Basel: Secretive Plans for the Issuing of a Global Currency

By Ellen Brown
Global Research, April 17, 2013
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-tower-of-basel-secretive-plans-for-the-issuing-of-a-global-currency/13239

This carefully research article by Ellen Brown was first published in
April 2009. It
sheds light on the current crisis of the World monetary system. (GR ed. M.
Ch.)

In an April 7 [2009] article in The London Telegraph titled “The G20 Moves
the World
a Step Closer to

a Global Currency,” Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote:

“A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders
amounts to
revolution in the global financial order.

“‘We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn
(£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity,’ it said.
SDRs are
Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the
International
Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.

“In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF’s power to create money
and begin
global ‘quantitative easing’. In doing so, they are putting a de facto world
currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body.
Conspiracy
theorists will love it.”

Indeed they will. The article is subtitled, “The world is a step closer
to a global
currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all
humanity.” Which naturally raises the question, who or what will serve as
this
global central bank, cloaked with the power to issue the global currency
and police
monetary policy for all humanity? When the world’s central bankers met in
Washington last September, they discussed what body might be in a position
to serve
in that awesome and fearful role. A former governor of the Bank of
England stated:

“[T]he answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the
Bank for
International Settlements (BIS). . . . The IMF tends to couch its warnings
about
economic problems in very diplomatic language, but the BIS is more
independent and
much better placed to deal with this if it is given the power to do so.”1

And if the vision of a global currency outside government control does not
set off
conspiracy theorists, putting the BIS in charge of it surely will. The
BIS has been
scandal-ridden ever since it was branded with pro-Nazi leanings in the 1930s.
Founded in Basel, Switzerland, in 1930, the BIS has been called “the most
exclusive,
secretive, and powerful supranational club in the world.” Charles Higham
wrote in
his book Trading with the Enemy that by the late 1930s, the BIS had
assumed an
openly pro-Nazi bias, a theme that was expanded on in a BBC Timewatch film
titled
“Banking with Hitler” broadcast in 1998.2 In 1944, the American
government backed a
resolution at the Bretton-Woods Conference calling for the liquidation of
the BIS,
following Czech accusations that it was laundering gold stolen by the
Nazis from
occupied Europe; but the central bankers succeeded in quietly snuffing out
the
American resolution.3

In Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (1966), Dr.
Carroll Quigley
revealed the key role played in global finance by the BIS behind the
scenes. Dr.
Quigley was Professor of History at Georgetown University, where he was
President
Bill Clinton’s mentor. He was also an insider, groomed by the powerful
clique he
called “the international bankers.” His credibility is heightened by the
fact that
he actually espoused their goals. He wrote:

“I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for
twenty years
and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960?s, to examine its
papers and
secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have,
for much
of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. . . . [I]n
general my
chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I
believe its
role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quigley wrote of this international banking network:

“[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim,
nothing less
than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able
to dominate
the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a
whole. This
system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of
the world
acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private
meetings and
conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International
Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the
world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.”

The key to their success, said Quigley, was that the international bankers
would
control and manipulate the money system of a nation while letting it
appear to be
controlled by the government. The statement echoed one made in the
eighteenth
century by the patriarch of what would become the most powerful banking
dynasty in
the world. Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild famously said in 1791:

“Allow me to issue and control a nation’s currency, and I care not who
makes its laws.”

Mayer’s five sons were sent to the major capitals of Europe – London,
Paris, Vienna,
Berlin and Naples – with the mission of establishing a banking system that
would be
outside government control. The economic and political systems of nations
would be
controlled not by citizens but by bankers, for the benefit of bankers.
Eventually,
a privately-owned “central bank” was established in nearly every country;
and this
central banking system has now gained control over the economies of the
world.
Central banks have the authority to print money in their respective
countries, and
it is from these banks that governments must borrow money to pay their
debts and
fund their operations. The result is a global economy in which not only
industry
but government itself runs on “credit” (or debt) created by a banking
monopoly
headed by a network of private central banks; and at the top of this
network is the
BIS, the “central bank of central banks” in Basel.

For many years the BIS kept a very low profile, operating behind the
scenes in an
abandoned hotel. It was here that decisions were reached to devalue or
defend
currencies, fix the price of gold, regulate offshore banking, and raise or
lower
short-term interest rates. In 1977, however, the BIS gave up its
anonymity in
exchange for more efficient headquarters. The new building has been
described as
“an eighteen story-high circular skyscraper that rises above the medieval
city like
some misplaced nuclear reactor.” It quickly became known as the “Tower of
Basel.”
Today the BIS has governmental immunity, pays no taxes, and has its own
private
police force.4 It is, as Mayer Rothschild envisioned, above the law.

The BIS is now composed of 55 member nations, but the club that meets
regularly in
Basel is a much smaller group; and even within it, there is a hierarchy.
In a 1983
article in Harper’s Magazine called “Ruling the World of Money,” Edward
Jay Epstein
wrote that where the real business gets done is in “a sort of inner club
made up of
the half dozen or so powerful central bankers who find themselves more or
less in
the same monetary boat” – those from Germany, the United States,
Switzerland, Italy,
Japan and England. Epstein said:

“The prime value, which also seems to demarcate the inner club from the
rest of the
BIS members, is the firm belief that central banks should act
independently of their
home governments. . . . A second and closely related belief of the inner
club is
that politicians should not be trusted to decide the fate of the
international
monetary system.”

In 1974, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was created by the
central bank
Governors of the Group of Ten nations (now expanded to twenty). The BIS
provides
the twelve-member Secretariat for the Committee. The Committee, in turn,
sets the
rules for banking globally, including capital requirements and reserve
controls. In
a 2003 article titled “The Bank for International Settlements Calls for
Global
Currency,” Joan Veon wrote:

“The BIS is where all of the world’s central banks meet to analyze the global
economy and determine what course of action they will take next to put
more money in
their pockets, since they control the amount of money in circulation and
how much
interest they are going to charge governments and banks for borrowing from
them. . .
.

“When you understand that the BIS pulls the strings of the world’s
monetary system,
you then understand that they have the ability to create a financial boom
or bust in
a country. If that country is not doing what the money lenders want, then
all they
have to do is sell its currency.”5

The power of the BIS to make or break economies was demonstrated in 1988,
when it
issued a Basel Accord raising bank capital requirements from 6% to 8%. By
then,
Japan had emerged as the world’s largest creditor; but Japan’s banks were
less well
capitalized than other major international banks. Raising the capital
requirement
forced them to cut back on lending, creating a recession in Japan like
that suffered
in the U.S. today. Property prices fell and loans went into default as
the security
for them shriveled up. A downward spiral followed, ending with the total
bankruptcy
of the banks. The banks had to be nationalized, although that word was
not used in
order to avoid criticism.6

Among other collateral damage produced by the Basel Accords was a spate of
suicides
among Indian farmers unable to get loans. The BIS capital adequacy standards
required loans to private borrowers to be “risk-weighted,” with the degree
of risk
determined by private rating agencies; and farmers and small business
owners could
not afford the agencies’ fees. Banks therefore assigned 100 percent risk
to the
loans, and then resisted extending credit to these “high-risk” borrowers
because
more capital was required to cover the loans. When the conscience of the
nation was
aroused by the Indian suicides, the government, lamenting the neglect of
farmers by
commercial banks, established a policy of ending the “financial exclusion”
of the
weak; but this step had little real effect on lending practices, due
largely to the
strictures imposed by the BIS from abroad.7

Similar complaints have come from Korea. An article in the December 12,
2008 Korea
Times titled “BIS Calls Trigger Vicious Cycle” described how Korean
entrepreneurs
with good collateral cannot get operational loans from Korean banks, at a
time when
the economic downturn requires increased investment and easier credit:

“‘The Bank of Korea has provided more than 35 trillion won to banks since
September
when the global financial crisis went full throttle,’ said a Seoul
analyst, who
declined to be named. ‘But the effect is not seen at all with the banks
keeping the
liquidity in their safes. They simply don’t lend and one of the biggest
reasons is
to keep the BIS ratio high enough to survive,’ he said. . . .

“Chang Ha-joon, an economics professor at Cambridge University, concurs
with the
analyst. ‘What banks do for their own interests, or to improve the BIS
ratio, is
against the interests of the whole society. This is a bad idea,’ Chang
said in a
recent telephone interview with Korea Times.”

In a May 2002 article in The Asia Times titled “Global Economy: The BIS
vs. National
Banks,” economist Henry C K Liu observed that the Basel Accords have
forced national
banking systems “to march to the same tune, designed to serve the needs of
highly
sophisticated global financial markets, regardless of the developmental
needs of
their national economies.” He wrote:

“[N]ational banking systems are suddenly thrown into the rigid arms of the
Basel
Capital Accord sponsored by the Bank of International Settlement (BIS), or
to face
the penalty of usurious risk premium in securing international interbank
loans. . .
. National policies suddenly are subjected to profit incentives of private
financial
institutions, all members of a hierarchical system controlled and directed
from the
money center banks in New York. The result is to force national banking
systems to
privatize . . . .

“BIS regulations serve only the single purpose of strengthening the
international
private banking system, even at the peril of national economies. . . . The
IMF and
the international banks regulated by the BIS are a team: the international
banks
lend recklessly to borrowers in emerging economies to create a foreign
currency debt
crisis, the IMF arrives as a carrier of monetary virus in the name of
sound monetary
policy, then the international banks come as vulture investors in the name of
financial rescue to acquire national banks deemed capital inadequate and
insolvent
by the BIS.”

Ironically, noted Liu, developing countries with their own natural
resources did not
actually need the foreign investment that trapped them in debt to outsiders:

“Applying the State Theory of Money [which assumes that a sovereign nation
has the
power to issue its own money], any government can fund with its own
currency all its
domestic developmental needs to maintain full employment without inflation.”

When governments fall into the trap of accepting loans in foreign currencies,
however, they become “debtor nations” subject to IMF and BIS regulation.
They are
forced to divert their production to exports, just to earn the foreign
currency
necessary to pay the interest on their loans. National banks deemed “capital
inadequate” have to deal with strictures comparable to the “conditionalities”
imposed by the IMF on debtor nations: “escalating capital requirement, loan
writeoffs and liquidation, and restructuring through selloffs, layoffs,
downsizing,
cost-cutting and freeze on capital spending.” Liu wrote:

“Reversing the logic that a sound banking system should lead to full
employment and
developmental growth, BIS regulations demand high unemployment and
developmental
degradation in national economies as the fair price for a sound global
private
banking system.”

While banks in developing nations were being penalized for falling short
of the BIS
capital requirements, large international banks managed to escape the rules,
although they actually carried enormous risk because of their derivative
exposure.
The mega-banks succeeded in avoiding the Basel rules by separating the
“risk” of
default out from the loans and selling it off to investors, using a form of
derivative known as “credit default swaps.”

However, it was not in the game plan that U.S. banks should escape the BIS
net.
When they managed to sidestep the first Basel Accord, a second set of
rules was
imposed known as Basel II. The new rules were established in 2004, but
they were
not levied on U.S. banks until November 2007, the month after the Dow
passed 14,000
to reach its all-time high. It has been all downhill from there. Basel
II had the
same effect on U.S. banks that Basel I had on Japanese banks: they have been
struggling ever since to survive.8

Basel II requires banks to adjust the value of their marketable securities
to the
“market price” of the security, a rule called “mark to market.”9 The rule
has
theoretical merit, but the problem is timing: it was imposed ex post
facto, after
the banks already had the hard-to-market assets on their books. Lenders
that had
been considered sufficiently well capitalized to make new loans suddenly
found they
were insolvent. At least, they would have been insolvent if they had
tried to sell
their assets, an assumption required by the new rule. Financial analyst
John Berlau
complained:

“The crisis is often called a ‘market failure,’ and the term
‘mark-to-market’ seems
to reinforce that. But the mark-to-market rules are profoundly anti-market
and
hinder the free-market function of price discovery. . . . In this case, the
accounting rules fail to allow the market players to hold on to an asset
if they
don’t like what the market is currently fetching, an important market
action that
affects price discovery in areas from agriculture to antiques.”10

Imposing the mark-to-market rule on U.S. banks caused an instant credit
freeze,
which proceeded to take down the economies not only of the U.S. but of
countries
worldwide. In early April 2009, the mark-to-market rule was finally
softened by the
U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB); but critics said the
modification
did not go far enough, and it was done in response to pressure from
politicians and
bankers, not out of any fundamental change of heart or policies by the BIS.

And that is where the conspiracy theorists come in. Why did the BIS not
retract or
at least modify Basel II after seeing the devastation it had caused? Why
did it sit
idly by as the global economy came crashing down? Was the goal to create
so much
economic havoc that the world would rush with relief into the waiting arms
of the
BIS with its privately-created global currency? The plot thickens . . . .

Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil
litigation
in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an
analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this
private
cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves,
and how we
the people can get it back. Her earlier books focused on the
pharmaceutical cartel
that gets its power from “the money trust.” Her eleven books include
Forbidden
Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The
Key to
Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are
www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com.

NOTES

1. Andrew Marshall, “The Financial New World Order: Towards a Global
Currency and
World Government,” Global Research (April 6, 2009).

What appear to be private contractors, wearing unmarked, matching
uniforms and
operating an unmarked SUV affixed with communication equipment near the
finish line
of the Boston Marathon shortly after the bomb blasts – can be seen
beforehand,
standing and waiting just meters away from where the first bomb was
detonated.

The contractor-types had moved away from the bomb’s location before it
detonated,
and could be seen just across the street using communication equipment and
waiting
for similar dressed and equipped individuals to show up after the blasts.

FOR IMAGES SEE THE INFO. Most images were taken from Flickr user
HahaTango, the entire collection of
150 images from the Boston Marathon can be found here.
THESE ARE THE CAPTIONS:

Image: An already widely distributed photo showing the contractor-types on
the
bottom left, just left of where the bomb was placed and detonated. The men
are
wearing matching, unmarked uniforms, large black bags, and appear to be
waiting,
separately, and “behind” the rest of the crowd. In the upper left corner,
a wooden
structure forming one half of a temporary photography “bridge” over the
finish line
can be seen and serves as a useful reference when establishing the
contractor-types’
position in other photos.

Image: After the explosion, two of the contractors seen by the wall next
to the
bomb, appear across the street, both using communication equipment. This
photo too
has been distributed and enlarged many times across the Internet. (click
to enlarge)

Image: An unmarked SUV with a considerable amount of communication gear on
the roof
appears, surrounded by identically dressed men. The vehicle parks near the
bleachers. (click to enlarge)....

Image: Event staff and contractors both above and below the bleachers
begin tearing
up the skirting and appear to be looking for something or retrieving
something while
casualties are still being treated and evacuated across the street. (click to
enlarge)....
The men, numbering between 6-8 then begin tearing up the skirting around
temporary
bleachers erected for the event, opposite the explosion, before taping it
off. Then,
what appears to be an FBI bomb squad truck pulls up directly behind the
contractor-types’ SUV, with a woman clearly wearing the letters F.B.I. on her
tactical vest emerging and speaking with the contractor-types. Together they
disappear from the scene, leaving their vehicles behind.

Image: What appears to be an FBI bomb squad truck pulls in, with a woman
wearing
what is clearly the letters F.B.I. on her vest. She talks with two
contractors while
it appears a third is partially in the truck’s right-hand side. Also note
that the
area contractors and event staff tore up, is now taped off. (click to
enlarge)....

Image: The FBI truck and contractor SUV sit seemingly abandoned – neither
the FBI
agent, nor the contractors can be seen. What they did, or where they went
remains so
far, unknown. (click to enlarge)....

It should be noted, that with the exception of the contractor-types, all
other
responders at the scene, including the FBI agent, can be clearly
identified, from
police to the fire department, to medics and even individuals wearing
vests with
“B.A.A. Physician” written on them. It should also be noted that no other
uniformed
individuals can be seen standing near the bomb site aside from the
contractor-types.

These men were unidentified, professional contractors apparently
augmenting public
servants at the Boston Marathon, present before and after the bomb blasts
in the
direct vicinity of the incident. After the blasts, whether it was their
intended
function or not, they appeared to be searching for something under the
bleachers
before being joined by what appears to be the FBI bomb squad. The FBI and
the city
of Boston has so far categorically failed to provide any information on
these highly
suspicious individuals.

Note: Most images were taken from Flickr user HahaTango, the entire
collection of
150 images from the Boston Marathon can be found here.

Questions That Must be Answered

Several questions must be answered by the FBI, leading the investigation
on behalf
of we, the American people. The first question is who these men were, with
large,
black bags in the direct vicinity of where a bomb would detonate, moving
away before
the blast, and appearing directly across the road afterward. Who hired
them and what
was their function? Why were they moving amongst the crowd in a
semi-covert fashion
when all other public servants present were wearing proper uniforms and
clearly
identified? Did police, firefighters, event organizers, and medics know
these men
were present and what they were doing?

Why did it appear that the FBI was fully aware of their presence, and in fact
working with them, specifically with what looks like a bomb squad unit?
Were these
contractors specialists in explosives, and if so, what is the significance
that at
least two of them were spotted just meters from where the blast occurred?

The checkered, frightening history (see: FBI’s History of Handing “Terror
Suspects”
Live Explosives) of the FBI’s involvement in fomenting false terror
attacks, and
even presiding over attacks that succeeded in maiming and killing innocent
people,
should call into question their presence or involvement at any public event,
especially when seen associating with unidentified, semi-clandestine
organizations
that appear to be private contractors.

Private contractors as well, do not answer or work for the public, but
rather the
highest bidder. Private contractors, most notably Blackwater and its various
incarnations have operated both domestically and abroad, committing
obscene crimes
and atrocities with seemingly absolute impunity. The term “defense
contractor” is in
fact a euphemism for mercenary, and has no place in a civilized,
democratic world,
no matter what their alleged mission statement may claim.

That both of these nefarious entities were present and cooperating in the
direct
vicinity of the Boston bombings, with at least two contractors standing
just meters
away from where the bomb actually went off, raises a number of
possibilities and
concerns. A drill may have been being conducted, though the FBI and city
officials
have denied this. Or, a threat may have been communicated to event
organizers ahead
of time, which prompted the inclusion of “auxiliary” security, though
again, both
the FBI and the city of Boston deny receiving any information prior to the
bombings.
Whichever contracting firm this may have been, may just have wanted to
swindle
Boston’s taxpayers for an easy payday, and coincidentally found itself in
the middle
of extraordinary circumstances.

However, alarming suspicion is raised when the FBI makes no mention of an
organization it was clearly coordinating with, particularly in terms of
bombs and
explosives before and after the incident, considering the nature of the
attack. When
an already dubious organization attempts to obfuscate the facts of any
given event,
it is the right and responsibility of legitimate law enforcement, public
representatives and the citizenry itself to demand and get answers. If we
are not
persistent, with the FBI’s bizarre behavior over the past few days, including
inexplicably cancelled and suspiciously rushed press conferences, and now
what
appears to be a Hollywood ending for the case, we may never get those
answers.
....
Note: Most images were taken from Flickr user HahaTango, the entire
collection of
150 images from the Boston Marathon can be found here.
....................................................................................................

The Boston Marathon bombing has provoked shock, grief and outrage from
around the
world. After decades of conditioning, the public automatically equates such
terrorism with Muslim radicals. But the evidence shows that every major
terror plot
on American soil in the past 10 years has been fostered, funded and
equipped by one
organization: the FBI.

People around the world watched in horror this week as explosions rocked
the finish
line of the Boston Marathon, turning a day of sportsmanship and
celebration into one
of shock, grief and outrage. As with all such events, the desire to
discover who was
behind this cowardly act has driven many into a speculative frenzy. And,
in a sad
reminder of the indoctrination that the Western world has been under for
over a
decade now in the mythical “war of terror,” it did not take long at all
before the
collective finger of the mob was pointed squarely in the direction of Muslim
terrorists.

Within hours of the blast, fear spread throughout the international Muslim
community
that the bombing would be connected to an Islamist extremist. A Libyan
Twitter user
touched a nerve—and received thousands of retweets and worldwide media
coverage—by
tweeting “Please don’t be a ‘Muslim.’” The backlash began shortly
thereafter, with
the New York Post falsely implying that a Saudi national was being
questioned for
his possible role in the attack. The next day, a plane departing Boston Logan
Airport returned to the gate and two passengers were forcibly removed
because they
had been overheard speaking Arabic before takeoff.

As data continues to pour in regarding the bombing and who may be behind
it, it is
instructive to take a moment to step back and consider this knee-jerk
tendency to
conclude that this is the work of Islamic radicals. In the minds of
millions of
Americans, bombs targeting innocents on US soil are inextricably linked
with the
image of the bearded, turban-wearing boogeyman that has become the
shorthand for
evil in this age of terror.

This association is not only incorrect, it is dangerously incorrect
because it
signally fails to identify the one unifying thread between all of the
recent terror
plots in the US. Lurking behind the shadowy armies of would-be jihadis in the
popular imagination is the sober reality that every single major terror
bust in the
United States since 9/11 has sourced back to the same group, a single
entity that
has in every single case funded, equipped and even incited the would-be
terrorists
into action: the FBI.

In 2005, federal prosecutors charged Michael Reynolds, a 47 year old
drifter living
with his elderly mother, of attempting to wage jihad on the US by blowing
up fuel
facilities. In reality, his plan for jihad was little more than a series of
conversations he had on a Yahoo! Chat room with a US judge posing as a
militant. He
was arrested after agreeing to meet with an FBI informant who had promised
him
$40,000 for his cause, and two months later the FBI quietly announced he
was likely
mentally ill. He was eventually convicted and is curently serving 25 years
in jail.

In 2007 the so-called “Fort Dix Six” were nabbed in a much-hyped FBI
terror bust
after allegedly hatching a plan to attack a US military base and kill the
soldiers
there. At the time, a 26-page indictment revealed that the group had “no
rigorous
military training” and “did not appear close to being able to pull off an
attack.”
The next year it was revealed that the FBI informant who had infiltrated
the group
had in fact offered to organize the members and lead the plot itself.

In 2009 the Newburgh Four were arrested for an alleged plot to blow up
synagogues
and shoot down military airplanes in Newburgh, New York. The group was a
ragtag
bunch of poor black men, at least one of whom was mentally unstable and
stored his
own urine in jars around his apartment. The group’s fifth member, Shahad
Hussein,
turned out to be an FBI informant who had promised the members hundreds of
thousands
of dollars to carry out the plot. In sentencing the defendants, Federal Judge
Colleen McMahon said:

“[The government] created acts of terrorism out of [the defendant's]
fantasies of
bravado and bigotry, and then made those fantasies come true. The
government did not
have to infiltrate and foil some nefarious plot – there was no nefarious
plot to
foil.”

In November 2010 the FBI busted the so-called Portland Christmas Tree
Bomber, who
was allegedly attempting to bomb the lighting ceremony at Portland’s Pioneer
Courthouse Square. “The threat was very real,” the FBI intoned at the
time. “Our
investigation shows that Mohamud was absolutely committed to carrying out
an attack
on a very grand scale.” The alleged bomber, Arthur Balizan, turned out to
be a
teenager who bragged to undercover agents that he could get a gun because
he was a
“rapper” and wrote an article on workout tips for jihadis.

In 2011 the FBI arrested a man that they themselves had supplied with a
remote
controlled plane and C4 explosives in a harebrained attempt to bomb the
Pentagon. In
2012 they busted another would-be jihadi that they again had supplied with
a fake
gun and suicide vest. Also in 2012 the FBI busted a group of five
“anarchists” who
were allegedly going to bomb a bridge in the Cleveland area, although it
was quietly
admitted that the FBI informant who had infiltrated the group had in fact
initiated
the contact with them and been present at the meetings where they
developed the plan
to blow up the bridge.

One of the most ridiculous examples of this pattern dates back to 2006,
when the DOJ
attempted to make it seem as if they had just nabbed a group of dangerous
jihadis
who were preparing a full ground war against the United States.

The picture that is painted by these facts is as overwhelming as it is
difficult for
much of the public to comprehend. The conclusion, nevertheless, is
incontrovertible:
that without the FBI, many of the so-called “terrorist cells” that have been
hatching their inept, bumbling schemes against the United States for
decades might
never have existed at all.

Despite what many would believe, this conclusion is not even
controversial. Rather,
it has been backed up time and again by evidence in the official record
and multiply
attested to by FBI insiders and whistleblowers themselves.

Given all of this damning history and insider whistleblowing, it is vital
that the
Western public break out of their media-induced programming and question
the core
assumptions of the war on terror paradigm that we have been programmed
with for
decades now. If there is to be speculation at all over events like these,
and if
there is any group that has to present a thoroughgoing case for why it is NOT
responsible for this atrocity, surely it is the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
Having been at the heart of so many terror plots in the past, both the
hilariously
inept and the chillingly successful, how could the public refuse to even
interrogate
the organization that has the most to answer for?

The simple fact of the matter is that the history of the modern age of
terrorism has
proven time and again that the FBI is the prime suspect in any terrorist
atrocity
that takes place on American soil. Let us all keep this in mind as the
details of
the investigations into this (and all other) American terrorist incidents
begins to
emerge.

We documented earlier today that the American government has squandered
huge sums of
homeland security and defense spending on useless tasks that increase –
rather than
prevent -terrorism.

Indeed, the head cross-country track coach at the University of Mobile –
Alastair
Stevenson – told Alabama’s Press-Register:

“At the starting line this morning, they had bomb sniffing dogs and the
bomb squad
out there,” he said. “They kept announcing to runners not to be alarmed,
that they
were running a training exercise.”

He added, “I’ve run a lot of races like this one, but I never saw bomb
dogs at the
starting line of any running event.

Stevenson provided additional details in an interview by local 15 tv news:

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line
of the
Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it
was odd
there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.

“They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it’s just a
training exercise,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.

Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start
of the
race. He’s been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London
and other
major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.

All of the marathon runners – including Stevenson – started the race hours
before
the bombs exploded.
Time Magazine reported yesterday:

Over the years, the Boston Marathon has undergone numerous security
overhauls. TIME
writer Katy Steinmetz reports: Under heightened security in 2002, 600 police
officers joined the runners. There were also an unprecedented 1,500 state
and local
police patrolling the route and another 1,500 security guards. There were 415
National Guard troops on hand. Helicopters, bomb-sniffing dogs, hazmat
teams and
radiation detectors were added. Boston Globe compared to security used for
the
Olympics and Super Bowl. According to the Mass. National Guard website,
more than
400 troops were involved in 2013, too. From the release: Pfc. Matthew S.
Knowlton, a
military policeman with the 747 Military Police Company, was one Soldier
assigned to
help out at the starting line. Describing the scene Knowlton said, “This
is a very
positive setting, I’m just happy to be here. There are a lot of people
here but it’s
a great crowd.”

Indeed, the Massachusetts National Guard release notes:

Sgt. Ezequiel Valencia, a human resources sergeant, with the 747 Military
Police
Company, Massachusetts Army National Guard, looks on as runners begin the
117th
Boston Marathon April 15, 2013 in Hopkinton, Mass. More than 400 Guardsman
were on
hand to help local law enforcement keep the route clear for an estimated
27,000
runners. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class James C. Lally, Massachusetts
National
Guard Public Affairs)

In addition, Mother Jones reports:

At 5:20 a.m. on Monday, four hours before the Boston Marathon’s elite
runners took
off, a group of 15 active-duty soldiers from the Massachusetts National Guard
gathered at the starting line in Hopkinson. Each soldier was in full
combat uniform
and carried a “ruck,” a military backpack weighing about 40 pounds. The
rucks were
filled with Camelbacks of water, extra uniforms, Gatorade, changes of
socks—and
first-aid and trauma kits. It was all just supposed to be symbolic.

“Forced marches” or “humps” are a regular part of military training, brisk
walking
over tough terrain while carrying gear that could help a soldier survive
if stranded
alone. These soldiers, participating in “Tough Ruck 2013,” were doing the
26 miles
of the Boston Marathon to honor comrades killed in Iraq and Afghanistan,
or lost to
suicide and PTSD-related accidents after coming home.

It took about eight hours for all of the soldiers to cross the finish
line, some
cruising nearly at a 13-minute mile, others coming in at a little slower
pace. They
were gathered near the medical tent behind the finish line, waiting for
the elite
runners to come in. That was the contingency plan in case anything went
wrong—meet
by the medical tent.

When the explosion went off, Fiola and his group immediately went into
tactical
mode. “I did a count and told the younger soldiers to stay put,” Fiola
says. “Myself
and two other soldiers, my top two guys in my normal unit, crossed the
street about
100 yards to the metal scaffoldings holding up the row of flags. We just
absolutely
annihilated the fence and pulled it back so we could see the victims
underneath. The
doctors and nurses from the medical tent were on the scene in under a
minute. We
were pulling burning debris off of people so that the medical personnel
could get to
them and begin triage.”

“There was a guy behind me covered in his own blood, and I started to
smell some
smoke. I turn around to look and he’s actually on fire.”

Once the victims were transported away for further medical care, Fiola and
the
others stood guard around the blast area. “We switched to keeping the
scene safe,
quarantining the area and preventing people from entering. There was a guy
behind me
covered, just covered, in his own blood, and I started to smell some smoke.

The ruckers at 5 a.m., before setting off on the course Military Friends
Foundation

As one of our readers notes:

All of America’s security forces were there. Spotters. Bomb sniffing
dogs. The
whole array. They even ran a drill beforehand.

HOW PATRIARCHY WORKS – HOW MEN RUN THE WORLD, SICKENING, MURDEROUS
THE BOSTON CONSPIRACY
(NaturalNews) In a story that's almost as explosive as the actual bombing
itself, the mainstream media is waging a total media blackout on the
photos of "The Craft" private military operatives who were present at the
Boston marathon bombing.

NaturalNews.com and InfoWars.com have published a multitude of photos
which absolutely prove that numerous members of "The Craft" private
military contractors were actively engaged in operations at the finish
line of the marathon.

This is photographic proof. In real police work, it's called "evidence."
But astonishingly, there is not a single mention of "The Craft" in any
mainstream media outlet: not NYT, not Washington Post, not LA Times, etc.
Not a single word.

This is quickly becoming the biggest media cover-up of all time.

FBI now pushing a false script rather than pursuing real evidence
The FBI is also deeply engaged in the cover-up, selectively choosing the
publicize photos of the patsies who are scripted to take the fall.

As part of its cover-up, the FBI has announced "other photos will not be
deemed credible."

Huh? The only photos that count are the ones you say count? How is that an
"investigation?"

So even though we have a multitude of photos now showing at least ten men
wearing combat uniforms, black backpacks and tactical gear, the FBI has no
interest in these people! Even though we have already proven through
photographic evidence that one of them is carrying a radiation detector
and that nearly all of them are carrying black backpacks.

Reporter censored at press conference
Dan Bidondi, an Infowars.com reporter based on the East Coast, attempted
to show photos of "The Craft" operatives during a public press conference
and was immediately censored by government agents holding up clipboards to
block his photos.

Incredible! No photos from the event that are not selected by the FBI are
allowed to be shown!

Click here to watch the video report.

It begs the question: What is so dangerous about these photos of "The
Craft" that a nationwide media blackout is being waged?

If there's a simple, innocent explanation for all this, why would it be a
problem to show the photos? Beware of any media outlet or government
department that tells you "You can't see THESE photos. That's not
allowed!"

These photos are BANNED by the media
The fact that these photos are banned by the media is nothing less than
cowardly, in-your-face censorship. It's one more good reason to turn off
CNN and tune in to Natural News and other alternative media outlets on the
web.

Remember: You are being told that all these photos (see below) don't
exist! And this gross omission by the mainstream media massively
discredits themselves. To any person getting their news from CNN, MSNBC,
Fox or any mainstream source, you are being played by a mind-control media
that's trying to sell you a scripted narrative.

Speaking of scripted narrative, see this image from two days ago for a
startling warning from an "insider" who openly warned the world about how
the Boston marathon bombing was all being scripted.

According to the script, a raid on the suspects' home will be conducted on
Friday, and officials will "find" black powder and an NRA book. This will
be used to attack gun owners and shut down all civilian sales of black
powder.

An amygdala hijack is normally perceived as an instant response to a
situation that
dies down pretty quickly when the thinking brain or neo-cortex kicks in
and brings a
calmer consideration and perception of the circumstances. It is the
neo-cortex that
says 'Oh my goodness what was I thinking?' Er, you weren't, that was the
problem.

Mark Twain said that a lie can be half way around the world before the
truth gets
its boots on and that can be the relationship between the thinking mind
and the
emotions in the midst of an amygdala hijack. One reason for this is that the
amygdala is like the sprinter kneeling in the blocks while the neo-cortex
is sitting
with its feet up reading a book - focussed on thinking and not reacting.

Once an emotional starting pistol goes bang the amygdala is off down the
track while
the neo-cortex says 'what was that noise?' And what keeps people in that
emotionally
'set' position is a constant barrage of perceived potential dangers -
'physical',
financial, personal, whatever.

Instead of having a gun in your holster in case of a threat it is
permanently in
your hand with the trigger cocked and so when a Problem-Reaction-Solution
scenario
is played out most of the population is already primed because of what I
will call a
state of 'amygdala standby'.

You can liken this to being in a dark house that is said to be haunted and
you jump
or freeze when you hear a noise that normally wouldn't bother you. The
amygdala
standby, using the sprinter analogy, is permanently in a state of 'on your
marks',
even 'set', because of all the fear stimuli that it has to scan and assess
in a
world where the most abundant emotions - by design - are anxiety and fear.
......................................................................................................................

Hundreds of poor people waiting outside of a closed grocery store for the
possibility of getting the remaining food is not the picture of the “American
Dream.” Yet on March 23, outside the Laney Walker Supermarket in Augusta,
Ga., that
is exactly what happened.

Residents filled the parking lot with bags and baskets hoping to get some
of the
baby food, canned goods, noodles and other non-perishables. But a local
church never
came to pick up the food, as the storeowner prior to the eviction said
they had
arranged. By the time the people showed up for the food, what was left
inside the
premises—as with any eviction—came into the ownership of the property holder,
SunTrust Bank.

The bank ordered the food to be loaded into dumpsters and hauled to a
landfill
instead of distributed. The people that gathered had to be restrained by
police as
they saw perfectly good food destroyed. Local Sheriff Richard Roundtree
told the
news “a potential for a riot was extremely high.”

“People got children out here that are hungry, thirsty,” local resident
Robertstine
Lambert told Fox54 in Augusta. “Why throw it away when you could be
issuing it out?”

SunTrust bank is trying to confuse the issue and not take direct
responsibility for
their actions. Their media relations officer Mike McCoy, stated, “We are
working
with store suppliers as well as law enforcement to dispose of the
remaining contents
of the store and secure the building.” Yet he also said that the food
never belonged
to SunTrust Bank.

There is no need to sugar coat what happened. Teresa Russell, chief deputy
of the
Marshal’s Office in Richmond County, said the owner of the building
ordered that the
food be taken to the landfill. Some people even followed the truck to the
landfill
and were still turned away.

In Richmond County, there are about 20 evictions per day, and the area
surrounding
the supermarket is one of the poorest in the state. According to the last
available
data, the poverty rate is 41 percent. Many people in that parking lot
probably knew
all too well how evictions work, and were in desperate need of the food
assistance.

This story is not some bizarre exception. It reeks of the truth of
capitalism and is
strikingly similar to the H&M scandal that broke in 2010 when clothes were
being
shredded before being thrown away, so as to make sure the value of the
merchandise
was unaffected.

In a capitalist society, the motive behind the production of food is not
to feed
people, housing is not made to give them shelter, clothing is not made to
keep them
warm, and health care is not offered primarily to keep people healthy. All
of these
things, which are and should be viewed as basic rights, are nothing other
than
commodities—to be bought and sold—from which to make a profit. If a profit
cannot be
made, usually due to overproduction in relation to the market, the
commodity is
considered useless by the capitalist and destroyed.

In this case, it appears the bank simply did not care. For the banks that
have made
their profits through evictions and foreclosures, it is little surprise
that they
showed no remorse in leaving people staring in disbelief, with empty bags,
as they
watched the food that could be feeding their families dumped into a landfill
instead.
.....................................................................................................

Goddess Rasa, thank You for Your gracious love and kindness. I have begun
the habit of writing down my dreams right when I wake up, or else I forget
them. One recent one I want to share involved me being inside of a house
that I was not really familiar with. I was supposed to find something in
there. I was looking through kitchen drawers, end table drawers, cabinets
and desk drawers. The house was kind of modern and well furnished. I'm
guessing I may have known the people who lived there, because it wasn't a
sneaky search, but just calm and thorough. I felt comfortable to take my
time and put things back as they were. I searched the entire downstairs,

RASA EXPLAINS:
You searched in all conventional methods for the meaning of Life or your
Path in life, in this place of Divine Truth. Divine Truth is a place you
are not familiar with. It is God’s house. You searched God’s house in
all conventional ways, but could not find an important answer you seek.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

then went upstairs, into a bedroom. I looked through the dresser drawers
and the drawers of the night stands on both sides of the bed. Then, I went
to the closet and began to look into shoe-boxes that were lined on the
floor, under an assortment of dresses that hung from the bar above. I

RASA EXPLAINS: YOU HAD TO GO HIGHER (UPSTAIRS) OR CLOSER TO GOD TO FIND
AN ANSWER, & YOU BEGAN ONCE AGAIN TO LOOK AT FAMILIAR CONCEPTS. BUT YOU
NEEDED TO LOOK DEEP, IN THE UNCONSCIOUS OR HIDDEN (CLOSET), & THERE YOU
FOUND IT.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

lifted the lid and saw a new pair of shiny, red heels. There was a
photograph in between them and I felt relieved to finally find it,

RASA EXPLAINS: SHOES ARE THE SANDALS OF THE GURU, OR THE GURU GIVING YOU
DISCIPLESHIP, A SPECIAL WALK OR POSITION. YOU ARE NOT AN ORDINARY MAN,
YOU HAVE THE SHOES OF THE GURU TO TALK IN NOW – A GIFT. THERE IS A
SPECIAL MEANING IN THESE SHOES. ONE, THEY ARE HIGH HEELS. THAT MEANS
PAIN, AS HEELS REPRESENT BEING PUT UPON THE CROSS –
“IF I BE LIFTED UP, I WILL DRAW ALL MEN UNTO ME.”
YOU MUST ACCEPT THE PAINS OF LIFE IN ORDER TO BE HAPPY, ABANDONMENT TO
DIVINE PROVIDENCE OR ACCEPTING ALL THINGS AS THE WILL OF GOD, “BAD” &
GOOD.
SECOND, THERE IS THE RED. RED MEANS FRESH BLOOD, SHINY IS FRESH. THIS IS
THE BLOOD OF SACRIFICE. YOU MUST SACRIFICE OR GIVE UP SIN, EVEN SOME
SEEMINGLY GOOD THINGS, TO GET INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD.
THE SHOES ALSO REMIND ME OF DOROTHY IN THE WIZARD OF OZ, WITH “FOLLOW THE
YELLOW BRICK ROAD” TO FIND A SPECIAL PLACE OR “PROMISED LAND.” THESE
SHOES ARE THE SHOES OF SPIRITUAL SUCCESS – THE HIGHEST SUCCESS.
THE FACT THAT THE SHOES ARE UNDER DRESSES ALSO INDICATES YOU MUST BE
PASSIVE TO GOD – FEMININE GARB REPRESENTS WE ARE ALL PASSIVE TO GOD, WE
CANNOT DOMINATE GOD, GIVE IN TO THE WILL OF GOD, LET GOD LEAD US.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

though I
cannot for the life of me recall what was in the picture. I put the picture
into my pocket and was leaving the house with it when I awoke

RASA EXPLAINS: YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT THE PICTURE IS BECAUSE IT IS YOUR
FUTURE LIFE, WHATEVER THAT MAY BRING. YOU TREASURE YOUR FUTURE LIFE GIVE
YOU BY GOD, NOT KNOWING IT, BUT ACCEPTING COME WHAT MAY, AS YOU PUT IT
INTO YOUR POCKET, CLOSE TO YOURSELF, YOU ACCEPT THE PAINS OF LIFE.

Goddess
Rasa, could this dream mean anything or is it just a random dream? Your
help is so very much appreciated.

Your humble devotee who adores You,
Tom

RASA: YOUR WELCOME TOM. THANKS FOR THE GENEROUS DONATIONS!
PS AT SOME POINT I WILL BAPTIZE YOU, GIVE YOU A NEW NAME, APPOINT YOU A
GOD MOTHER & GOD FATHER FROM THE SAINTS. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU HAVE
ALREADY BEEN BAPTIZED, IT IS A NEW INITIATION OR UPDATED BAPTISM.