I just watched this not 10min ago and was going to post it.You beat me!

I think this shows that there are still some changes that need to be made in the name of security in the US
If this guy can hop a fence and have time to write on a plane, we have issues with security.Personally though, I give the guy a

Doesn't surprise me that Air Force One was so easily reached even under so called heavily guarded. You can even fire an anti-tank missile from that
range because they don't extend the perimeter security far out. Security is always laxed even after 9/11. Like that guy who fired the AK-47 assault
rifle through the White House fence, or the guy who committed suicide crashing a small plane into the White House back in the late 90s, thats how
vunerable our facilities and govt sites are. But no doubt somebody will get in trouble, most likely the person who oversees the security of the plane
and base.

sorry guys but this is a fake if you read the disclaimer you will see that it is fake.

Here a small part of it:

"You, the viewer of the preceeding are hereby advised that the video does not depict a real event. It is intended for the sole, limited and express
purpose of entertainment and to induce you, the viewer of the video, to think critically about freedom of expression and speech and the government's
responses to the same."

Please read the language set forth herein carefully as it may affect, inhibit, modify or otherwise influence the interests or perceptions of
any end user (hereinafter "you" or "end user") viewing the preceeding video (also referred to herein and hereas as "The Still Free Video"). You,
the viewer of the preceeding are hereby advised that the video does not depict a real event. It is intended for the sole, limited and express purpose
of entertainment and to induce you, the viewer of the video, to think critically about freedom of expression and speech and the government's
responses to the same. Therefore, and by reason of the foregoing, the producers, creators and distributors of this video hereby verily certify that
the foregoing fictionalization and dramatization was not real. Furthermore, and without limitation now, since the beginning of time and without
perpituity, the producers, creators and distributors of this video and anyone else who was involved in the making of this video assume no risks or
liabilities stemming from or related to your ("the end user's") viewing of same and assume no liability for any damages that result directly or
indirectly from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletions of files, viruses, errors, defects or any failures of performance, communications
failures, theft, destruction or unauthorized access. Copying, duplication and distribution of this video is encouraged.

Well that certainly does ruin any kind of credibility he was hoping to build with the "Why I Tagged Air Force One" video. The way I see it if you
dont have the balls to actually do it you have no right using the faked crap as a platform even if it is to make people think critically.

The way I see it if you dont have the balls to actually do it you have no right using the faked crap as a platform even if it is to make people
think critically.

Nice way to put it, however you have to understand if you tried that in real life you’re likely to loose your life. Is that worth two minutes
of fame? One more thing, can someone tell me how this is suppose to make you think critically?

Umm... that doesn't make any sense. If its real and he got away with it (which I doubt as you can’t get that close to AFO) than why would he post
the video? The Feds would know it was him, and he still would get in trouble no matter how many disclaimers he put up. Also, the point of is to
somehow make you think critically, although sadly for me its not working.

Umm... that doesn't make any sense. If its real and he got away with it (which I doubt as you can’t get that close to AFO) than why would he post
the video? The Feds would know it was him, and he still would get in trouble no matter how many disclaimers he put up. Also, the point of is to
somehow make you think critically, although sadly for me its not working.

[edit on 19-4-2006 by WestPoint23]

I know westpoint, I was just throwing it out there because I, like you, don't see how this is making a statement at all, or making me think
critically. If he had actually done the tagging, that would be different, but this? Dunnot. Well, he is drawing attention to himself, that's
something I guess.

But where is the bit that goes "the following is fake"? I can't seem to find it.
If it is fake, it is incredably well done.

-----

And dammit! I went out looking for images of grounded 747's, got em all into photoshop, and it turns out that the engines are in fact low enough to
do that! which I find surprising. They aren't even 2 metres off the ground.

Ive stood (well, sat in a truck) next to air force one while it was it Travis AFB. My stepfather gave me a midnight tour while he was stationed
there.

There were heavily armed guards standing in a complete circle around the plane spaced about 10-15 feet apart. There was a few humvees as well. There
was NO way you could have pulled off anything even sort of close to something like this, and you would probably die trying. Those guards looked like
some pretty nasty dudes. Needless to say they didnt let us stay there for long.

Also, it was sitting all by itself surrounded by floodlights smack dab in the middle of the tarmack with nothing but ground a hundred yards (give or
take

When AF1 comes into Hickam, we lose about 1/3rd of the parking ramp. The only planes allowed to park on that portion of the ramp are AF1, the backup,
and the Press Plane. As was said, there are guards constantly arround it, the Secret Service has a dedicated landline in a car, by the nose of the
plane, that goes to their backup.... There's no way he could have gotten close enough to do this.

As far as the engines, they CAN'T put them too high off the ground, or you'd have such an extreme angle on the wing it wouldn't be able to support
them.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.