https://www.foodsforbetterhealth.com/university-of-illinois-study-suggests-water-can-be-used-to-control-weight-doesnt-add-up-12237 University of Illinois Study Suggests Water Can Be Used to Control Weight—Doesn’t Add UpMichael J. Watson, BAFoods 4 Better Health2016-03-02T06:00:33Z2016-03-08 16:46:45Food News

Home > Food News > University of Illinois Study Suggests Water Can Be Used to Control Weight—Doesn’t Add Up

University of Illinois Study Suggests Water Can Be Used to Control Weight—Doesn’t Add Up

It is well known that water is good for you, but a new study out of the University of Illinois goes a step further by suggesting plain water can be used as a way to control weight. Taking the study’s results at face value suggests that a few more glasses of water each day can help reduce calorie intake and how much saturated fats, sugar, sodium, and cholesterol are in the diet.

To quickly summarize the study in question: University of Illinois kinesiology and community health professor Ruopeng An drew on data from four waves of the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (to get a look at what his 18, 311 subjects ate over the course of two non-consecutive days). He calculated the amount of plain water—defined here as any water from a fountain, tap, or bottle—they ingested as a percentage of their total water intake from other food or drink sources like soda or tea. He then compared this finding to the nutritional contents (or lack thereof) in the diet overall and attempted to draw conclusions from there.

Advertisement

Here is what he found (the findings were consistent across race, ethnicity, economic, and body weight status):

Average intake of plain water was 4.2 cups per day, or a little over 30% of total daily water intake.

Average calorie intake was 2,157, with 125 coming from sweetened drinks and 432 from “discretionary” calories—this means things like desserts or other treats.

Those who drank one percent more plain water per day also ate fewer calories (8.58 less overall, with 1.43 less coming from sweetened drinks and 0.88 from discretionary foods); 0.21 grams (g) less overall fat intake, 0.007g less saturated fat intake, 0.74g lower sugar intake, 9.80mg lower sodium intake, and 0.88g lower cholesterol intake, on average.

Now, the conclusion An has drawn from all this is that the increase in water is correlated to the reduced fat, sugar, sodium, and calorie intake—and he proposes boosting water consumption as a possible way to improve public health. Unfortunately, his own findings don’t support this conclusion. The one percent increase in plain water that An observed works out to 0.042 cups on average, an extremely small increase. Similarly, the perceived effects on fat, salt, and sugar intake are also extremely small—less than a gram in most cases. These small numbers are a problem because they make it much more likely that the findings were just the result of statistical noise.

Remember: The data An drew on is only for two non-consecutive days. There is no way to determine whether the nutritional information he collected is representative of the participants’ diets or average eating habits. Furthermore, An has not established whether his observation is correlation, causation, or statistical noise. An is assuming that plain water consumption is the determining factor here, without any evidence to back the claim up. For all his data shows (and assuming these minor deviances are not statistical noise), it is equally possible that eating less saturated fat is responsible for the observations.

Advertisement

Bottom Line on the University of Illinois Study

There is no way to know if An’s observations have any meaning or relationship due to how small the data set is and how small the observed changes are.

Even if there is a relationship, there is no evidence that the amount of plain water ingestion is the influential factor.

It is premature to try and claim any cause-effect or correlative relationship from this study’s findings and even more premature to try and suggest public policy options from it.