Comments

[deleted]
5:02pm Mon 11 Aug 14

[deleted]

TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???
HELLO!!!
- they were obviously up to no good themselves..
Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...
I feel very sick.Youlikemyjugs

TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???

HELLO!!!

- they were obviously up to no good themselves..

Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...

I feel very sick.

Score: -30

Wide Bertha
4:44pm Mon 11 Aug 14

deport them back up north

deport them back up northWide Bertha

deport them back up north

Score: 45

Goldenwight
4:53pm Mon 11 Aug 14

Wide Bertha wrote…

deport them back up north

ATTENTION! DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS

[quote][p][bold]Wide Bertha[/bold] wrote:
deport them back up north[/p][/quote]ATTENTION! DO NOT FEED THE TROLLSGoldenwight

Wide Bertha wrote…

deport them back up north

ATTENTION! DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS

Score: -62

[deleted]
5:06pm Mon 11 Aug 14

[deleted]

[quote][p][bold]Youlikemyjugs[/bold] wrote:
TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???
HELLO!!!
- they were obviously up to no good themselves..
Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...
I feel very sick.[/p][/quote]Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.
A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.JHunty

Youlikemyjugs wrote…

TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???

HELLO!!!

- they were obviously up to no good themselves..

Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...

I feel very sick.

Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.

A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.

Score: 34

[deleted]
5:12pm Mon 11 Aug 14

[deleted]

[quote][p][bold]JHunty[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Youlikemyjugs[/bold] wrote:
TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???
HELLO!!!
- they were obviously up to no good themselves..
Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...
I feel very sick.[/p][/quote]Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.
A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.[/p][/quote]No man and woman have ever sat on a bench at Duke's Mound. Everyone knows this...
Just another Argus error I think you'll find.Youlikemyjugs

JHunty wrote…

Youlikemyjugs wrote…

TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???

HELLO!!!

- they were obviously up to no good themselves..

Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...

I feel very sick.

Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.

A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.

No man and woman have ever sat on a bench at Duke's Mound. Everyone knows this...

Perhaps "Gay Romanian Gypsy MP arrested for having sex with cute kitten in Brighton public toilet" or similar? Now THAT would get the comments going!

Hell, why don't the Argus hust print the headlines people want to read (and truth be damned!)
Perhaps "Gay Romanian Gypsy MP arrested for having sex with cute kitten in Brighton public toilet" or similar? Now THAT would get the comments going!Goldenwight

Perhaps "Gay Romanian Gypsy MP arrested for having sex with cute kitten in Brighton public toilet" or similar? Now THAT would get the comments going!

Score: -49

Wide Bertha
5:38pm Mon 11 Aug 14

I'll have a pint of what Goldenwight is drinking.
Trolling, really ?? Do you understand what trolling actually is ? My comment was relative to the assailants (one from Salford), and the other NFA (but probably likely also from a former industrial northern town), as many of the lowlife who frequent Brighton seem to be.

I'll have a pint of what Goldenwight is drinking.
Trolling, really ?? Do you understand what trolling actually is ? My comment was relative to the assailants (one from Salford), and the other NFA (but probably likely also from a former industrial northern town), as many of the lowlife who frequent Brighton seem to be.Wide Bertha

I'll have a pint of what Goldenwight is drinking.
Trolling, really ?? Do you understand what trolling actually is ? My comment was relative to the assailants (one from Salford), and the other NFA (but probably likely also from a former industrial northern town), as many of the lowlife who frequent Brighton seem to be.

Score: 40

maxiboy_
5:46pm Mon 11 Aug 14

Until this country starts to lock these violent people up for 20, 30, 40 years then this kind of crime will continue to grow.

A murderer gets 15 years for taking the life of an innocent person and this proves that there is no REAL justice in Britain today. This country has been run down by absolute filth in the highest echelons of power who have created a criminal paradise.= out of their warped ideology based on criminal rights.

Until this country starts to lock these violent people up for 20, 30, 40 years then this kind of crime will continue to grow.
A murderer gets 15 years for taking the life of an innocent person and this proves that there is no REAL justice in Britain today. This country has been run down by absolute filth in the highest echelons of power who have created a criminal paradise.= out of their warped ideology based on criminal rights.maxiboy_

Until this country starts to lock these violent people up for 20, 30, 40 years then this kind of crime will continue to grow.

A murderer gets 15 years for taking the life of an innocent person and this proves that there is no REAL justice in Britain today. This country has been run down by absolute filth in the highest echelons of power who have created a criminal paradise.= out of their warped ideology based on criminal rights.

Score: 13

stevo!!
5:51pm Mon 11 Aug 14

Hmm.....

So why no charge of assault?

If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?

Who rang the police?

Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?

Hmm.....
So why no charge of assault?
If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?
Who rang the police?
Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?stevo!!

Hmm.....

So why no charge of assault?

If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?

Who rang the police?

Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?

Score: -50

BlackRocker
7:38pm Mon 11 Aug 14

stevo!! wrote…

Hmm.....

So why no charge of assault?

If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?

Who rang the police?

Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?

And your point is? Or are you the counsel acting for the accused?

[quote][p][bold]stevo!![/bold] wrote:
Hmm.....
So why no charge of assault?
If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?
Who rang the police?
Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?[/p][/quote]And your point is? Or are you the counsel acting for the accused?BlackRocker

stevo!! wrote…

Hmm.....

So why no charge of assault?

If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?

Who rang the police?

Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?

And your point is? Or are you the counsel acting for the accused?

Score: 42

stevo!!
8:26pm Mon 11 Aug 14

BlackRocker wrote…

stevo!! wrote…

Hmm.....

So why no charge of assault?

If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?

Who rang the police?

Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?

And your point is? Or are you the counsel acting for the accused?

The point (only for those with the required intelligence to have spotted it) is that once again the police have given a report to The Argus which raises many questions rather than explains the situation clearly enough so that the reader has no doubt what has occurred.

[quote][p][bold]BlackRocker[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]stevo!![/bold] wrote:
Hmm.....
So why no charge of assault?
If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?
Who rang the police?
Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?[/p][/quote]And your point is? Or are you the counsel acting for the accused?[/p][/quote]The point (only for those with the required intelligence to have spotted it) is that once again the police have given a report to The Argus which raises many questions rather than explains the situation clearly enough so that the reader has no doubt what has occurred.stevo!!

BlackRocker wrote…

stevo!! wrote…

Hmm.....

So why no charge of assault?

If they had fled their attackers, why did they require to be 'helped' into a private garden? Were they being chased?

Who rang the police?

Two men are appearing in court, so there is enough evidence to charge them......why the need for these 'samaritans' to come forward?

And your point is? Or are you the counsel acting for the accused?

The point (only for those with the required intelligence to have spotted it) is that once again the police have given a report to The Argus which raises many questions rather than explains the situation clearly enough so that the reader has no doubt what has occurred.

Score: -43

hoveguyactually
10:51pm Mon 11 Aug 14

'Scott Cavanagh, 31, of Spruce Court, Salford, and Jack Bonnet, 23, of no fixed address, have been charged with robbery and attempted robbery. Both are due to appear at Lewes Crown Court on 28 August.'

If they were charged with robbery, how come they were also charged with attempted robbery?

'Scott Cavanagh, 31, of Spruce Court, Salford, and Jack Bonnet, 23, of no fixed address, have been charged with robbery and attempted robbery. Both are due to appear at Lewes Crown Court on 28 August.'
If they were charged with robbery, how come they were also charged with attempted robbery?hoveguyactually

'Scott Cavanagh, 31, of Spruce Court, Salford, and Jack Bonnet, 23, of no fixed address, have been charged with robbery and attempted robbery. Both are due to appear at Lewes Crown Court on 28 August.'

If they were charged with robbery, how come they were also charged with attempted robbery?

Score: 1

[deleted]
5:59am Tue 12 Aug 14

[deleted]

[quote][p][bold]Tr1stan[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]JHunty[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Youlikemyjugs[/bold] wrote:
TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???
HELLO!!!
- they were obviously up to no good themselves..
Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...
I feel very sick.[/p][/quote]Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.
A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.[/p][/quote]Stupid woman![/p][/quote]Not you Jhunty - talking about Bertha JugsTr1stan

Tr1stan wrote…

JHunty wrote…

Youlikemyjugs wrote…

TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???

HELLO!!!

- they were obviously up to no good themselves..

Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...

I feel very sick.

Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.

A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.

Stupid woman!

Not you Jhunty - talking about Bertha Jugs

Score: -3

stevo!!
11:51pm Mon 11 Aug 14

hoveguyactually wrote…

'Scott Cavanagh, 31, of Spruce Court, Salford, and Jack Bonnet, 23, of no fixed address, have been charged with robbery and attempted robbery. Both are due to appear at Lewes Crown Court on 28 August.'

If they were charged with robbery, how come they were also charged with attempted robbery?

Well, they asked for specific items, one being cash, which they obtained, the other being phones, which they didn't.

They therefore attempted to rob them of their phones.

[quote][p][bold]hoveguyactually[/bold] wrote:
'Scott Cavanagh, 31, of Spruce Court, Salford, and Jack Bonnet, 23, of no fixed address, have been charged with robbery and attempted robbery. Both are due to appear at Lewes Crown Court on 28 August.'
If they were charged with robbery, how come they were also charged with attempted robbery?[/p][/quote]Well, they asked for specific items, one being cash, which they obtained, the other being phones, which they didn't.
They therefore attempted to rob them of their phones.stevo!!

hoveguyactually wrote…

'Scott Cavanagh, 31, of Spruce Court, Salford, and Jack Bonnet, 23, of no fixed address, have been charged with robbery and attempted robbery. Both are due to appear at Lewes Crown Court on 28 August.'

If they were charged with robbery, how come they were also charged with attempted robbery?

Well, they asked for specific items, one being cash, which they obtained, the other being phones, which they didn't.

They therefore attempted to rob them of their phones.

Score: -17

[deleted]
5:56am Tue 12 Aug 14

[deleted]

[quote][p][bold]JHunty[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Youlikemyjugs[/bold] wrote:
TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???
HELLO!!!
- they were obviously up to no good themselves..
Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...
I feel very sick.[/p][/quote]Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.
A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.[/p][/quote]Stupid woman!Tr1stan

JHunty wrote…

Youlikemyjugs wrote…

TWO MEN SITTING ON A BENCH AT DUKE'S MOUND???

HELLO!!!

- they were obviously up to no good themselves..

Probably , they were discussing the most abominable things that decent people don't even know the names of...

I feel very sick.

Gosh you seem a bit eager for attention. Let's see, first sentence of the article.

A MAN and a woman were allegedly robbed for 30p as they sat on a bench.

Stupid woman!

Score: 0

twinglemum
9:59am Tue 12 Aug 14

Maybe if the council did something about the people sleeping in tents in that area, problems like this May begin to be eliminated, when are the council going to start looking at the disgusting state of this city, we are over run with drunks living in tents and doorways, not to mention the van dwellers that are everywhere

Maybe if the council did something about the people sleeping in tents in that area, problems like this May begin to be eliminated, when are the council going to start looking at the disgusting state of this city, we are over run with drunks living in tents and doorways, not to mention the van dwellers that are everywheretwinglemum

Maybe if the council did something about the people sleeping in tents in that area, problems like this May begin to be eliminated, when are the council going to start looking at the disgusting state of this city, we are over run with drunks living in tents and doorways, not to mention the van dwellers that are everywhere

Score: 4

spa301
10:40am Tue 12 Aug 14

Surely the Police could track them once they went on the extravagant spending spree with their loot?

Surely the Police could track them once they went on the extravagant spending spree with their loot?spa301

Surely the Police could track them once they went on the extravagant spending spree with their loot?

Score: -6

Youłikemyjugs
12:35pm Thu 21 Aug 14

Apologies for anything stupid or offensive I said on this story.

Apologies for anything stupid or offensive I said on this story.Youłikemyjugs

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here