Worldwide Covert Attacks - See The Patterns

I honestly don't think there is an international shared goal of remote control, particularly given the events going on globally that are likely linked to the technology, such as: mass shootings / bombings - many of the shooters / bombers said they heard voices, and said things that sounded similar to what some TI's have experienced; disruptions of power facilities and airport systems, and submarine and other high technology "accidents" or explosions that could be similar to the unexploded ordnance (underwater mines) the former Royal Navy member Barrie Trower discusses in a YouTube video “Barry Trower, physicien expert, dénonce les micro ondes et le Wi-Fi”; and unexplained physical and mental illnesses for which we may have conceived new labels in order to rationalize the inexplicable. It seems more like attacks from a rogue state or a covert war. These things, even just the TI phenomenon, are not something governments would want to happen to their citizens (or their infrastructure) due to the various economic and other costs - targeting of individuals makes them less productive, they seek added health care due to symptoms, they lose their jobs or suffer other financial difficulties, etc; and if you add on the things I mention above including the possibility that some attacks are covertly occurring to the general population, this would be very costly.

I believe it came from WWII. If you think about MKULTRA, the CIA's purported mind control program, it probably came from WWII because ULTRA was the designation among the Allies for ultra secret intelligence during the war. And MK could stand for "Menschliche Kontrolle," German for "human control." It could have been this horrible thing they discovered that might be difficult to defend or protect against since it uses radio waves or microwaves. With no way to avoid it, the countries involved may have had to watch, wait and hope that no one would use it negatively, but someone did. And I believe they must be able to do it covertly, somehow shielding the attackers (perhaps shielding a specific area and sending wired information to an electromagnetic wave transmitter). And prior to the launching of satellites and advances in computer technology, it could have been performed in a different way.

At the very least it could be a covert war among several countries, but I believe Australia has been targeting the US and other countries for years and attempting to lay blame on others or simulate a covert war. A country like Australia lacks it’s own power in the world, they have lacked serious innovation of their own, and they are dominated by mining to the detriment of other industries. As a result, they could have an inordinate amount of envy, which is destructive. And, I believe if given the ability to attack others in a covert manner without being easily detected, they might have no problems doing so, and would not be suspected by their allies.

It also makes more sense that it would be Australia rather than anyone else because they have revealed the technology to people (overtly showing individuals that it's there and what it can do), when they could use it in a negative manner without doing so. This is a technology you would reveal to no one. To me it seems the height of indiscretion and absurdity to reveal something of this nature to random civilians, and if you think about the USA, Russia, China, or anyone else, they might be less likely to sort of exhibit and demonstrate the technology such as is done in the Targeted Individual community because they have more to lose.

Even if you don't believe it is Australia perpetrating these attacks, then it would still more likely be a kind of covert war rather than some kind of international shared goal of human remote control. And the goal of human remote control would be more effective without the harassment - people wouldn't know it was there and want to fight it.