Thomas Royle Dawber (1949-66) was appointed as chief epidemiologist shortly after the start of the project, when it was not progressing well.[1]
The study had been intended to last 20 years, but at that time Dawber moved to Boston and became a preventive medicine chair, raising funds to continue the project and taking it with him.

One of the crucial questions in evidence-based medicine is how closely the people in a study resemble the patient you are dealing with.[2]
Recently the Framingham studies have become regarded as overestimating risk, particularly in the lower risk groups, for UK populations. Nevertheless, they are very useful. There has been widespread discussion of the study, but it is generally accepted that the work is outstanding in its scope and duration and is considered very useful.

The initial population was 5209 healthy men and women aged 30 to 60, not the whole of the town population as is sometimes assumed. A similar longitudinal study has been carried out in a high proportion of the residents of Busselton, a town in Western Australia, over a period of many years.[3]
However Framingham is more widely cited.