Google engineers are no longer sure how their #deeplearning system thinks, it is thinking for itself in ways beyond human programming.

"This means that for some things, Google researchers can no longer explain exactly how the system has learned to spot certain objects, because the programming appears to think independently from its creators, and its complex cognitive processes are inscrutable."

Did you hear the disappointing news? Even though we won the popular vote by a landslide the IAU voted down the naming of the P5 moon of Pluto to Vulcan. They said it was a hypothetical planet from the 1800's that was proven not to exist in later years. However, since this non-existent body was written about then the moon could no be named Pluto. For those of you that will argue that a cold moon should not be named Vulcan and to wait for a planet:

1. When will we ever have the opportunity to name a planet?

2. The names already thrown out. They cannot then go back and decide that a planet could be named Vulcan because it would make them hypocrites because they've already argued here that the name cannot be used because it already was used.