Go to page

professional daydreamer

Well-Known Member

I heard that. I thought that was pretty out of line. Stick with the facts that you know. Don't start getting personal at that level. I think Gohmert kind of regrets that part of this questioning. And he should.

I hope he does regret it, yet at the same time I fully understood it. You have someone sitting before you lying his ass off, smirking at you with the full knowledge there isn't a damned thing you can do about his lying his ass off, nothing you can do about his bias, earning a healthy income to sit there and lie to you, surrounded by people who are also earning an income (all of these incomes paid out of tax dollars) to stop him from doing anything which might make it easier for you to do something about his lying his ass off to you....you become frustrated and infuriated at the incompetence of the FBI leadership, the lack of accountability, the injustice of the whole thing, and you lash out. Sort of like the Democrats' responses.

Board Mommy

I'm guessing Strzok's smug little smirk is what set Gohmert off. It set me off and I wasn't even the one questioning him. The arrogance of this man is infuriating.

The other thing that struck me hard is the Dems leaping to his defense and interrupting any questioning that put this punk in the hot seat. Why? Don't they want the truth? Don't they think the FBI should be impartial and unbiased?

The Dems made it perfectly clear that this is "their boy", which tells me that not only did Hillary Clinton break the law and possibly commit treason, but they were all in on it and helped cover it up. Every single one of those emeffers needs to be in prison. This isn't supposed to be a Dems vs. GOP thing, and yet that is exactly what those crooked bastards have made it.

Well-Known Member

It did bring out the screams - which was funnier really than Gohmert's comments. Yes, "they got out of hand", if you will (hell, nothing like Parliament!!)- but the whole thing is ridiculous and should never have even been necessary.

I think at that point Gohmert was quite pissed at Strzok's snotty attitude and threw that out there to get a reaction. And he did get a reaction: from the Democrat committee members. That right there told me all I need to know about these aholes.

Just being a fly in the ointment...

The other thing that struck me hard is the Dems leaping to his defense and interrupting any questioning that put this punk in the hot seat. Why? Don't they want the truth? Don't they think the FBI should be impartial and unbiased?

Really. Sitting up there with that sneer on his face, lying his ass off, insisting that he is of impeccable moral character...while he'd been sending those juvenile text messages to his girlfriend behind his wife's back.

I still can't get over those texts. Seriously? This is what's rolling around the FBI these days? These two 7th graders??

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

You have to wonder about this Strzok person, what kind of an arrogant ass he is to be sassing a United States Congressman during a hearing where he is being questioned about his unethical and perhaps illegal behavior.

I agree that he has a punchable face. I can only imagine he was so smug becuase he either:
1) had been told by the FBI lawyers to not answer any hard questions and they would back him up
2) he knows what the FBI knows and he is just waiting for the other shoe to drop.

Pixelated

I'm guessing Strzok's smug little smirk is what set Gohmert off. It set me off and I wasn't even the one questioning him. The arrogance of this man is infuriating.

The other thing that struck me hard is the Dems leaping to his defense and interrupting any questioning that put this punk in the hot seat. Why? Don't they want the truth? Don't they think the FBI should be impartial and unbiased?

The Dems made it perfectly clear that this is "their boy", which tells me that not only did Hillary Clinton break the law and possibly commit treason, but they were all in on it and helped cover it up. Every single one of those emeffers needs to be in prison. This isn't supposed to be a Dems vs. GOP thing, and yet that is exactly what those crooked bastards have made it.

Well, of course he's their new poster child. He was adamant about his hatred for Trump. And that's why dems aren't interested in the truth. When you have members of congress (Bonnie Watson Coleman) actually saying that Trump is unfit and not legitimate as president - a complete disregard for our election process and will of the people - how do they get to the point where the truth is even interesting to them?

Board Mommy

Well-Known Member

The guy is a conniving liar. His actions are inexcusable, and I still wonder what nation state Hillary was sending her emails to, why she was sending them and why anyone would look the other way at such a blatant act of treason.