The First Cut is the Deepest

Nicole Kurokawa Neily

Finally, we’re starting to see some actual recommendations on what the Debt Supercommittee should cut. Politico reports that Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT) has proposed cutting two of ObamaCare’s more expensive provisions –Medicaid expansion and subsidies to help consumers buy insurance.

From the article:

Rehberg said now is not the time to expand Medicaid and create a new entitlement of tax subsidies. He likened the provisions to an “expensive vacation home” that the average American wouldn’t buy if it was facing the nation’s deficit problems.

Rehberg suggests eliminating the law’s expansion of Medicaid to cover Americans up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, as opposed to 100 percent now. He also suggests repealing the law’s refundable tax credits, which would provide assistance on a sliding scale of up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level.

I’ve written in the past how Medicaid is a suboptimal program that provides poor care – if it can be accessed at all. Why on earth would we want to put more people into a program like that? Sure, they’re “covered” in one sense – which seems to make people feel like they’ve done their patriotic duty and can walk away from the problem. But our poorest and most vulnerable citizens deserve quality health care – and Medicaid is not presently structured in a way to do so.

If we, as a country, determine that we do want to keep Medicaid – let’s give it a massive overhaul. Try block granting funding to states, so they have more control over who’s in the program, what benefits they receive, and how care is delivered, managed, and measured.

In addition, I really like the idea of abolishing ObamaCare’s “support” for families to purchase health insurance. All they do is mask the true cost of this program – so that people don’t get upset when they realize that their personal insurance costs have risen under the President’s plan. Getting rid of these subsidies – and that’s what they are, despite calling them “tax credits” – will help demonstrate that the emperor has no clothes.

Alas, Rep. Rehberg’s plan is unlikely to come to fruition… but it’s definitely a step in the right direction.

STAY CONNECTED

Stay up-to-datewith everything IWF!
Sign up for our newsletter:

Email Address *

First Name *

Last Name *

* indicates required

IWF PODCAST

BESPOKE PODCAST

Events

Features

Book Store

IWF on TWITTER

Independent Women’s Forum’s mission is to improve the lives of Americans by increasing the number of women who value free markets and personal liberty. Sister organization of Independent Women’s Voice.