SAFETY HAZARDS OF ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS
Information Sheet
Background
Physical and chemical properties of nanoscale materials, arising primarily from the high surface
area of nanomaterials per unit mass, are used beneficially in a number of applications, for example
as catalysts and in nano-energetics. However, there are also a number of potential safety hazards
arising from these properties, for example the risk of fire, explosion or unexpected catalytic activity.
Evaluation of potential safety hazards
This review was commissioned by Safe Work Australia and undertaken by Toxikos Pty Ltd,
through funding provided under the National Nanotechnology Strategy. It reports that the current
understanding of safety hazards of engineered nanomaterials arising from their physical and
chemical properties is primarily associated with combustibility and explosivity of airborne dusts.
Potential explosivity of dust clouds of engineered nanomaterials
Accidental explosions have been reported involving metal nanopowders that have resulted in
deaths of workers:


during the production of aluminium nanopowder by mechanical attrition milling, and
in the premix plant of a slurry explosive factory when loading a batch mixer with very fine
aluminium flake.
Dust clouds of some engineered nanomaterials are able to result in very strong explosions if the
concentrations of engineered nanomaterials in air are sufficiently high and the dusts can be
ignited. However, the severity of explosion for engineered nanomaterials is no higher than that
seen for their micron-sized counterparts.
In a well-managed workplace, concentrations of airborne emissions from nanotechnology
processes will be substantially lower than concentrations needed for an explosion. In some
situations where production is not controlled effectively to minimise airborne dusts, for example
during grinding of materials or in some material handling processes, there is potential for air
concentrations in localised areas to be sufficiently high to result in explosions.
The minimum ignition energy varies considerably with nanomaterial type. Nanoscale metal
powders are easily ignitable (low minimum ignition energy), but carbon nanomaterials are not
(high minimum ignition energy).
Information about physicochemical hazards in safety data sheets
For the engineered nanomaterials safety data sheets reviewed for the report, there was a lack of
information provided to enable persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBUs) and
workers to identify safety hazards associated with the use of the engineered nanomaterials.
Regulations
Australia’s work health and safety (WHS) legislation aims to protect the health and safety
of workers researching, developing, manufacturing or using engineered nanomaterials. Duties
under the legislation apply to working with engineered nanomaterials as they do to technologies,
substances, chemicals and materials generally. These general duties require risks to be
eliminated or minimised and for risks to be communicated.
There are also specific WHS Regulations for workplace hazardous chemicals, which cover
engineered nanomaterials in the same way as other chemicals if they are classified as hazardous.
The findings of this review of the safety hazards of engineered nanomaterials have implications
for duty holders under the WHS Regulations.
In the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), there
is currently no specific hazard category for the explosivity of dust clouds.
In the GHS, a flammable solid is defined as a solid that is readily combustible or may contribute to
fire through friction. Readily combustible solids are powdered, granular or pasty substances which
are dangerous if they can be easily ignited by brief contact with an ignition source, such as a
burning match, and if the flame spreads readily. Some nanomaterials may potentially be readily
combustible solids and hence classifiable as flammable solids under the WHS Regulations.
Manufacturers and importers
Even if a nanomaterial is not classified as hazardous according to the GHS, the model Code of
Practice for the Preparation of Safety Data Sheets recommends that an SDS be provided for
engineered nanomaterials. If there is potential for a dust explosion hazard to exist when handling
the engineered nanomaterial, this should be reported in the SDS.
Persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBUs), workers and process designers
SDS may not provide sufficient information for identifying and assessing the physical and
chemical hazards of engineered nanomaterial. The report recommends that where key properties
are not known, a precautionary approach should be adopted and workplace procedures
implemented to reduce or remove the possibility of dust cloud formation.
Risk management approach
The general risk management process is illustrated in Figure 1. Details are in the model Code of
Practice: How to manage work health and safety risks and for chemicals generally in the Code of
Practice: Managing risks of hazardous chemicals in the workplace. It can be applied to working
safely with engineered nanomaterials.
The approach to choosing controls for working with engineered nanomaterials is the same as for
working with chemicals generally, for example following the hierarchy of controls.
Figure 1: The risk management process
Preventing accidents when working with engineered nanomaterials
The report notes that there are standard measures currently used for dusty materials and dusty
chemicals that can be put in place to reduce the likelihood of explosion from engineered
nanomaterials. Process designers, PCBUs and workers involved in handling engineered
nanomaterials should be made aware of appropriate risk controls to prevent accidents.
The report notes that workplace procedures to reduce the possibility of a dust explosion could
include:





the use of wet processes allowing staff to work with nanomaterials in an agglomerated
state or dispersed state
working in well ventilated workspaces that provide efficient exhaust ventilation equipped
with particle filtration
implementing good housekeeping to minimise the build-up of dust layers that may be
disturbed to form dust clouds
using a confined process. This may include incorporation of a protection barrier to reduce
the severity of an incident or a prevention barrier to reduce probability of an incident, and
using an inert process i.e. a process that does not build an explosible dust/air mixture or a
process that does not have ignition sources.
Workplace procedures should be implemented to reduce or remove the possibility of dust cloud
formation. The prevention of dust accumulation in the workplace minimises the likelihood of dust
cloud formation as a result of a disturbance.
Measurements to assess airborne concentrations of engineered nanomaterials can be undertaken
using the approaches described in the research report recently published by Safe Work Australia
entitled Measurements of Particle Emissions from Nanotechnology Processes, with Assessment
of Measuring Techniques and Workplace Controls.
More information
Information on nanotechnology work health and safety is available on the Safe Work Australia
website including:
 Evaluation of potential safety (physicochemical) hazards associated with the use of
engineered nanomaterials
 Measurements of Particle Emissions from Nanotechnology Processes, with Assessment of
Measuring Techniques and Workplace Controls
www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au
Contact Us
General Enquiries
Email
Postal Address
Media Enquiries
02 6121 5317
[email protected]
GPO Box 641 Canberra ACT 2601
0434 644 294