Note: version 5, a big improvement over version 4, was released on June 8, 2010.

Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware Pros:
Open Source
Feature rich core, including polls, wikis, and lots more
No outdated plugins or worries about the long-term commitment of plugin developers

Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware Cons:
No significant plugin community; if it’s not part of the core, it doesn’t exist
Fewer theme options and custom layouts
Weak U.S. presence (stronger in Europe)
Weak support (e.g., no WordPress or Buddypress for Dummies)

You apparently misread the review. By weak support, I meant that Tiki Wiki did not have the same quality of support as WordPress and Buddypress. I thought that was clear from the context (and, by the way, I’m a great fan of @LisaSabinWilson‘s books, which is why I mentioned their titles). In any case, I welcome any additional insights into the relative strengths of Buddypress and its peers.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘Buddypress vs. Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware’ is closed to new replies.