Well....I was actually going to respond when I had more time than a few minutes to write. Apparently, that is not acceptable. Too funny.

Well, clearly I was wrong. Baltimore was the right side. As much as I feel Baltimore was the recipient of the 4th down call in the endzone, San Fran didn't come to play, and didn't deserve to win because of several poor mistakes. If they get the call like many feel they should have; they win the game. Other than the clear talent advantage, the one big reason I liked the Niners in the game was the coaching advantage and I was dead wrong on that one. Jim Harbaugh got circles run around him by his brother. The Ravens were clearly the more prepared team.

Other than the game, I will say that as much as I believed the Niners would win big, this thread was created half in mockery at the ridiculous threads that have become common place at Covers.com. Yes, it is hypocritical that I created a thread like this, so I deserve all the posts from above. I've got no problem with that. Serves me right. No biggie.

It's sad that an objective opinion has to be considered a "homer pick" because it coincides with my team preference. I've been on the site...even before this site, with the pre-dated old wagerline.com site. I picked regularly against the Niners, including several times this season. My record on San Fran games over the years speaks for itself. Nobody ever had a problem before....mostly because SF stunk. Last year I started getting the "homer" comments regularly once they started winning regularly. Not a coincidence, but whatever. No harm, foul. Should have known better to have even commented during the playoffs. No win situation either way.

Congrats to the knowledgeable Baltimore backers who cashed. See you next season

Even if you got that call, the Ravens would have driven down the field and scored a touchdown or a field goal. Depending on the 49ers converting the 2 point conversion, a field goal could have won that game. So don't say that the 49ers would have won. Ravens had 3 timeouts and would have had over a minute. In the NFL, that is way more than enough time to win a game. If you watch the play you will see Crabtree runs into the CB and creates contact because he wanted to push off. So the CB held onto him because he wasn't going to let the push off happen. So if you really look at it Crabtree should have been called for a offensive pass interference.

Even if you got that call, the Ravens would have driven down the field and scored a touchdown or a field goal. Depending on the 49ers converting the 2 point conversion, a field goal could have won that game. So don't say that the 49ers would have won. Ravens had 3 timeouts and would have had over a minute. In the NFL, that is way more than enough time to win a game. If you watch the play you will see Crabtree runs into the CB and creates contact because he wanted to push off. So the CB held onto him because he wasn't going to let the push off happen. So if you really look at it Crabtree should have been called for a offensive pass interference.

Exactly, 3 timeouts and and less than 2 minutes. The way Flacco was burning SF secondary. Baltimore would have drove down the filed and won the game easy

Lots of Seattle love here, have no problem with Seattle from myself since i bet on them in the Wildcard and Divisional. The departure of Gus Bradley might have impact on the team, shall see. NFC West will be a very tough division next season with Rams and Seahawks lurking, but i expect 49ers to come ahead again.

i kinda did loose money on the ravens....my bookie only paid me half my winnings...cuz he didnt like the fact that the game went 5 qtrs (whn u add in the power outage)......what kinda garbage is that....?...see those clowns (bookies)...expect you to be playin them...whn they realize they payin you....you hear bullshit excuses....ill just find a new bookie...one of angol-saxon decent.....no niggas...(tired of em)....and im black myself

18+ and BeGambleAware. Activities offered by advertising links to other sites may be deemed an illegal activity in certain jurisdictions. Viewers are specifically warned that they should inquire into the legality of participating in any games and/or activities offered by such other sites. The owner of this website assumes no responsibility for the actions by and makes no representation or endorsement of any of these games and/or activities offered by the advertiser. As a condition of viewing this website viewers agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from the viewer’s participation in any of the games and/or activities offered by the advertiser.