Model Kits

A brief rundown of most of the various model kits available of the Sea Vixen - unfortunately at the time of writing
there is only one really good kit (in 1/48) and the type hasn't been very well served in plastic.

1/144

Tokiwa Aircraft Create Sea Vixen FAW.2

1/144

Resin

Price ~£34 (imported from Japan)

Released 2000s

The only option that I know of in this scale is from Tokiwa Aircraft Create (TAC) of Japan. It's an FAW.2 only, resin, very expensive,
hard to find... and looks to have some serious shape issues judging by photos of built-up kits, looking more like a caricature of the
real thing than an accurate model. Decals are provided for XN649 of 899 NAS.

1/72

High Planes 7236 1/72 FAW.1/FAW.2/D.3

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price ~£15 (second hand) to 24 (imported from Australia)

Released 2002

A limited run injection moulded kit, still available from Australian retailers, a little more tricky to get hold of in the UK, and rather pricey as a result.
For accuracy of shape, this is the current leader of the field, with the fuselage, nose and canopy all looking much
more accurate than the Frog, Xtrakit/MPM or Dragon kits. The tail booms are the correct length unlike the other 1/72 kits.
It also has generally more accurate surface detailing and a good ejector seat. On the negative side the pinion tanks are way too fat, the
top of the fins need the same work as the Xtrakit one, and it looks like it'll be a challenge to get everything to fit with much filler needed
(mind you, same can be said for the Xtrakit). Cockpit is basic but a fairly decent basis for further detailing (though there is nothing - not even
a seat - for the observer). No engine detail; no option for flaps, arrestor hook or airbrake to be down, and no folded wing option either.
Altogether considerably more basic in feel than the Xtrakit or Dragon, but far more accurate in overall shape and streets ahead of the Frog kit.
In general this is the most accurate 1/72 Sea Vixen available. It will be a challenge to build and really is for the experienced modeller but this
gets my thumbs up - recommended. Production has basically ceased on this kit, and at the time of writing (Jan 2016) it is only available
new without decals, which has reduced the price a little.

Dragon/Cyberhobby Sea Vixen FAW.1

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price £36.99 (RRP)

Released 2011

Everybody was looking forward to this one, with Dragon's reputation for quality. However,
pictures of the sprues indicate there are some serious shape problems with the kit. First of all, and it kills it for me, the nose
and belly is the same wrong shape as seen on the pregnant looking Xtrakit/MPM effort (see below). The windscreen and canopy are a total mess. The ejector
seats are far too small. The aircon/demist piping on the port side running alongside the canopy is far too big but doesn't run far
enough backwards. The boundary layer vents that it runs over are in the wrong place. Upper fuselage contours around the engines
are wrong. Wing fences are the wrong shape. Fuel jettison pipe should not be present on an FAW.1. Tops of tails wrong shape. Sides
of tail booms are flat and shouldn't be (this might be fixable with some judicious sanding). The NACA intakes on the tailbooms are depicted
backwards. Intake splitter plates, if glued as per instructions, will leave a big lip around their edges which isn't there on the real thing -
pack them out from behind to keep them flush with the surrounds. Wingfold fairings too flat and entirely missing from the outboard folding section.
Scissor links on undercarriage legs are moulded solid. Radome opening handle is incorrectly moulded as a raised panel, while the genuinely raised panels
covering the radome hinge points aren't depicted at all, nor are the raised reinforcing plates you find in various places on the airframe.

The pop-out ram air turbine is a funny thing to include, and is both too short and too wide
anyway. Why was that included but no roof for the air brake bay? On the missed opportunity front there's also the question of why no radar detail, why no arrestor hook bay roof,
and why supply Red Tops but not Firestreaks (the Mk.1 didn't carry the former).

The little underwing camera pods are also specific to a very few development aircraft (XJ476 is the best known),
none of which are covered by the kit decal sheet. This, some of the shape errors and parts breakdown would tend to indicate they've
based their efforts on the Xtrakit/MPM kit rather than the real thing. What a waste. Oh yes, and the price!! It'd be overpriced if it were perfect, and
it's far from it. Spend much the same and get the fabulous 1/48 Airfix kit instead! About all you can say in this kit's favour is that it fits together
without all the fuss the Xtrakit/MPM kit would put you through. Build thread here
(I'm not sure if the builder has put the tailplane on upside-down or if the kit incorrectly moulds the upper and lower surfaces identically)

Dragon/Cyberhobby Sea Vixen FAW.2

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price £34.99 (RRP)

Released 2013

All the comments that apply to the Dragon/Cyber Hobby FAW.1 sadly apply to this one too. Differences are the provision of pinion tank overlays for the
tail booms (sadly once again too fat), a reshaped upper fuselage with bulged hatch area for the observer and a new decal sheet (which is pretty
decent and offers six options). While it has all the same faults as the FAW.1 it can be found cheaper than that release at the moment (as low as £14.99).
At that price point it suddenly becomes a bit more attractive as an option - it still needs a similar amount of error-correcting as the Xtrakit/MPM
kits, but doesn't have all the basic fit issues, so is far less grief to deal with.

Xtrakit Sea Vixen FAW.2/D.3

1/72

Injection moulded plastic & some resin

Price ~£18.50 (RRP, similar second hand)

Released 2008

This kit looks like it was rushed out, and suffers from various flaws. While initial impressions are good, some of the finely recessed surface detailing
is fictional, there are various moulding flaws evident (in particular the tip of the radome is blunt or holed in every single kit) and almost all of the resin parts
(ejector seats, radar boot, refuelling probe mount etc.) are either massively underscale or overscale and utterly useless as
a result. Actually trying to put the kit together you will find very few parts actually fit without a struggle; the engine
faces are entirely fictional, the jet pipes far too shallow (though the resin rear faces of the engine turbines are nicely done),
the windscreen and canopy shape is all wrong, the nose is off (too thin and pointy, rocket pod/pure air storage bulges too large, and the belly far too bulged),
boxy aerial fairings under the fuselage are missing, bulges on the large main gear doors are missing, wingfold hinge fairings are the wrong shape
and length, intakes aren't wide enough and have a somewhat guppy like aspect compared to the real thing, the instructions would have you put the fuel dump pipe on the wrong wing, the arrestor hook bay is the wrong shape, tailfin tops are
too high and curved, wingtips similarly off in shape, intake guide vanes missing, cockpit looks like a good effort but apart from the two
instrument panels is a bit of a waste of space - much correction and scratch building needed. The FAW.2 is made by adding tail boom extensions on
top of the basic FAW.1 layout, and these extensions simply do not fit, and are too fat and rounded. The only underwing stores provided
are drop tanks - no missiles or rocket pods. No option for flaps, arrestor hook or airbrake to be down. Wings could be posed folded if you scratch built the entire hinge area, as the outer wings are
separate, but there is basically nothing in the kit that helps you position them in anything other than the spread
position. To make an accurate Sea Vixen from this kit you need to put in quite a
lot of work - but then, to put it together out of the box you need to put in quite a lot of work too! On the plus side, the
decals are excellent, though the D.3 option needs you to scratch build the fairings on the wing tips.
This kit is basically a missed opportunity - Xtrakit/MPM could have made every other kit obsolete if they'd
just made more of an effort. My experience was also that Hannants (the people behind Xtrakit) refused to provide a parts replacement service
with this kit (unlike any other manufacturer); no doubt as they knew full well every single box had a damaged nose cone. Modelling should be
fun, and this kit is no fun. Build thread here.

MPM Sea Vixen FAW.1

1/72

Injection moulded plastic & some resin

Price ~£21.50 (RRP, similar second hand)

Released 2009

This contains exactly the same plastic and resin as in the Xtrakit FAW.2 box. It is around £3 more expensive, however, for which you get
4 decal options instead of 2, and some extra resin bits - 4 pylons and a camera pod to use on the option for XJ476 (missile development aircraft that
had different pylons and aforementioned pod). Unfortunately the pylons are the wrong shape still, and the pod is way too small. Thus you're paying
for more bits of resin only fit for the bin. The early style FAW.1 canopy is not supplied in the kit so you'll need to add the extra frames to the
supplied item (or to a vacform replacement), and XJ476 didn't have the rocket pack bulges so you need to get rid of those if choosing that option.
Every comment on the FAW.2 release applies to this one too. The instructions wrongly tell you to paint the tailplane underside grey, it should be white with
a grey leading edge.

Frog F409 Sea Vixen F.A.W.2. Strike Fighter

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price ~£9 (second hand/new)

Released 1976

A much-reboxed kit, this one, originally from Frog. Also marketed by Novo, Modelcraft, Eastern Express
and (to their eternal shame), Revell (quite recently, so still readily available). This is a pretty basic
kit (very much of its time), though it has fairly well done raised detail. Unfortunately it suffers from a variety of flaws, the major
ones being that the shape of the fuselage is distinctly 'off' (too fat, nose looks too short, canopy sits too high) and everything
else just looks rather too chunky. Some people 'correct' the major flaw by adding a small extension between the radome and fuselage, making it
longer (too long in fact), but it does improve the look. The canopy really does sit too proud though, and that is the major appearance
problem, so I suspect fixing that would make the rest of the problems stand out less. The fit of the parts varies with the moulding you buy,
and in general this is an old and tired kit that is way past it's sell by date. Unlike most Sea Vixen kits in this scale it does offer
a folded wing option - and strangely comes with extra outer wing sections to cater for this, when it would have been easy enough not to bother with different
ones for the different position. It is substantially cheaper than any other 1/72 option but needs a lot of correctional work to
produce an accurate model.

Gerald J. Elliott H.S. Sea Vixen FAW-2

1/72

Vacform plastic

Price ~£5 (second hand)

Released 1970s?

An ancient and crude vacform with white metal ejector seat, joystick, undercarriage, refuelling probe, arrestor hook and jet pipes. Little more than a curio these days with a variety of shape problems evident and very basic surface detailing. For masochists only.

Sky Guardians SGE72-003-01 Sea Vixen FAW.2

1/72

Diecast

Price £51 (RRP)

Released 2012

A diecast model betraying lazy research and lack of attention to detail. This is basically a mostly metal copy of the ancient and inaccurate Frog kit,
albeit with fine recessed panel lines rather than raised ones. The only major difference is that the canopy has been modified to better represent the real
thing - even so they've totally mucked up the angle of the windscreen where it meets the sliding portion so it looks very odd from the side. This is not
helped by the ejection seat and pilot sitting too far aft and far too low in the cockpit. It shares all of the shape errors of the Frog original, with
everything being too chunky, tail booms lacking depth, nose too short and fat, intakes too large, upper fuselage contours a parody of the real thing, etc.
In addition, the undercarriage legs are too big and painted the wrong colour. Their size makes the
model sit at entirely the wrong angle. The aircraft presumably represents the preserved XP924 rather than the XP924 of the 1970s, in that there is no
refuelling probe - however the paint job doesn't match up with either 1970s or current day versions with all of the red stencilling missing from the top
surface engine access hatches, '134' codes on the nose being too big and ROYAL NAVY titles mis-positioned. The observers hatch is painted black, which
is accurate for when in-service, but not for the current day aircraft. There is no representation at all of the observers window. Finishing off this lack
of attention to detail are the underwing stores - plain white Red Top missiles (they were never this colour), a bizarre all-white 'pointy thing' (possibly
the worst representation of a rocket pod in history?) and drop tanks that are too fat. For the price, it's a pretty laughable effort.

Frog F325 DH110

1/72

Injection moulded plastic

Price ~£20-50 (second hand)

Released 1950s

A real rarity these days, and very much a collectors' item, fetching extremely high prices
when it does pop up from time to time on eBay. It a bit of an oddity, with the kit providing decals for a non-existent aircraft ('XF830').
The blunt nose and FAW.1 style canopy would indicate it was intended to be a model of the third DH-110, XF828; however, there is no
arrestor hook, and the earlier airbrakes of WG236/WG240 are depicted along with their longer rear fuselage area. Wings outboard of the
fence have slightly increased chord (like XF828) but no leading edge droop (back to being a model of WG236/WG240). Tailboom shape is
definitely that of WG240. Undercarriage is basic and largely fictional, with no gear bays at all.
No cockpit to speak of. Surface detail is all raised lines and loads of rivets (not present on the
real thing). The tailboom fairings do not go far forward enough on the top surfaces of the wing. No intake tunnels or jet pipes so there
is a distinctly see-through look to the fuselage if built out of the box. Four cannon troughs are present on the underside of the nose,
as per XF828.

Being a strange mix of the three prototypes, it does make a good basis for modelling one of them but you need to be aware of the
many differences between each aircraft in order to make the required changes. The easiest one to make from the kit would be WG240 -
fill the cannon troughs, cut back the outer wing leading edge a bit and modify the shape of the intake splitter plates. WG236 would require
that work plus some reshaping of the lower tailbooms. For XF828 you'd be better off starting from a Sea Vixen kit rather than this one as
the fuselage of XF828 appeared to be very close to the production examples (with the exception of the cannons).

Magna Models FAW.1 / FAW.2

1/72

Resin and white metal

Price ~£20 (second hand) to £30 (new)

Released 1990s

From inspection of the FAW.2 it looks a lot like the Frog kit overall - I wouldn't be surprised if the master
was basically a rescribed Frog kit. Engraved detail overall but it wobbles a bit in places and isn't square on where
it should be in others. The pilot's canopy area is moulded as part of the top fuselage half and is very much like
the inaccurate Frog representation of this area, and the aircon/rain clearance tube doesn't go back far enough. No
cockpit detail at all - just a white metal ejector seat (and none for the observer). Late style observer canopy is
provided as a vacform transparency, you need to hack out a big hole in the top fuselage half and build the observer's
cockpit from scratch if you want to use it. Jetpipes basic and far too shallow; arrestor hook moulded closed (and poorly done),
nose gear bay shallow and mostly closed off, with a hole for the nose gear leg that is in entirely the wrong place (middle
of the bay instead of forward edge). Main gear bays deeper but no detail and again locating holes for legs in the wrong
place. Intake tunnels present but no compressor faces. Vertical tails correctly shaped but as with Xtrakit, they have
moulded the large half-cone bits at the rear of the horizontal stabiliser as part of the tail rather than part of the stabiliser.
Wings are basic; fuel dump pipe poorly done, no wing fold detail. Lots of thin flat parts (missile fins, wing fences, airbrake
strakes, some gear doors, intake splitter plate) are supplied on a single wafer of resin and mine has warped badly. Even if it
hadn't, sanding the other side to free them would be a hell of a job and it'd be much easier to replace these parts with plastic
card. White metal is used for gear legs, Red Top missiles, pylons. Lots of flash but the legs and missiles look good. No decals.
For the high price and limited improvements over the Frog kit (it has all the same shape errors),
it makes very little sense to buy this kit.

Magna also produce an FAW.1 conversion set in resin to enable you to convert
the Frog kit into a Mk.1, with replacement tail booms and wing inserts. This is reportedly similar quality to Magna's complete kits,
and hard work to marry up to the Frog kit successfully.

1/48

Airfix Sea Vixen FAW.2

1/48

Injection moulded plastic

Price ~£30 to £39.99 (RRP)

Released 2011

Simply the best Sea Vixen kit in any scale, bar none. Lots of beautifully moulded parts with crisp detail, capturing many subtleties missed
on other kits of all scales. The attention to detail really is impressive, with optional parts to enable the airbrake and arrestor hook
to be positioned closed, fully down or at an intermediate position which enables the aircraft to sit on its landing gear (fully down the
airbrake and hook extend so low the wheels wouldn't touch the ground). The wings can be built folded or spread; the control surfaces - including
flaps - are all separate (and all but the flaps can move); there are even optional flattened wheels. The cockpit is a pretty good effort, and
the wheel, airbrake and flap bays all have basic detail too.

A superbly comprehensive decal sheet covers a selection of FAW.2 airframes - sadly no colourful D.3 - and no FAW.1s, because
the kit only includes parts to build an FAW.2. Just about every single stencil applied to the real thing is included, so it'll take several sessions
just to apply all the decals! Unfortunately one decal option is for an aircraft without the later bulged observer hatch, and
the kit does not cater for the earlier flat hatch. This kit is well up to the standard of Airfix's excellent 1/48 Lightnings (which have now been
re-released).

I have begun to build an example of the kit and it is going together very nicely - the parts are beautifully engineered and
almost 'snap together' with very little fettling needed so far. Close examination shows a few small errors in panel line locations etc. but
nothing serious so far. You can follow my build on various forums:

Alley Cat Sea Vixen FAW.1 conversion

1/48

Resin

Price £25 (RRP)

Released 2011

This resin set enables you to build an FAW.1 using the 1/48 Airfix FAW.2 kit. Now I'll admit right out I helped
with research on this set so may accuse me of bias if you like but this is an excellent conversion set. Supplied are replacement tail booms and nose (nose required
as it is modified to remove the raised observer hatch and introduce the depressions aft of the rocket packs - though these
are a little too deep so some filler would be an idea) and bulged outer main gear doors. FAW.1 style windscreen, canopy and observer's hatch are all supplied
in clear resin. On top of that, to improve on the basic kit parts, you also get nicely detailed ejector seats and a small insert for the upper fuselage to
enable you to reposition one of the vents that the kit has in the wrong place.

Decals are included covering no fewer than six different aircraft - XN696/488 of 899 NAS, XJ611/706 of 766 NAS, XJ584/249 of 890 NAS, XN654/464 of 893 NAS,
XN691/219 of 892 NAS and XN694/463 of 893 NAS. Two of these can also be represented in differing schemes by mixing and matching codes from the kit sheet. The
kit stencilling is used for the most part but several FAW.1-specific items are included on the conversion set decal sheet and a sheet is included showing which
stencils to use and which not to use from the kit. Finally a set of canopy masks are included to make the job of painting the windscreen and canopy as easy as possible.

The decals are beautifully printed and the resin parts are crisply detailed and cleanly cast with no air bubbles etc. - a quality package all round really and
recommended if you want to build an FAW.1. Alley Cat also provide a set that contains just the upper nose part of this set and flat observer hatch if you want to
build an FAW.2 with the early style of hatch (as mentioned above, one of the kit decal options actually requires the early hatch).

Dynavector #4803 Sea Vixen FAW.2

1/48

Vacuum formed plastic and white metal

Price £85 (imported from Japan)

Released 1995

For a long time this was the only option in this scale and it used to be pretty good value (available direct from Dynavector in Japan), but the exchange rate
collapse has turned it into a wildly expensive proposition. Well detailed, it requires a certain amount of modelling skill to get the best out of it and I have
my doubts about the shape of the radome and the rear fuselage. There are also quite a few errors in panel lines (e.g. tailplane mirrored top/bottom - it isn't
on the real thing). It certainly builds up into an impressive looking model but at more than twice the price of the Airfix kit with not a single improvement over
it, this kit has been well and truly superseded.

1/32

Panther Productions 2000 Sea Vixen

1/32

Vacuum formed plastic and resin

Price ?

Released 2001?

Just one option here - Panther Productions 2000 (later Panther Model Club) produced a limited run vacform/resin kit.
It is now hard to find, popping up occasionally on eBay and other second-hand sales venues. It has some serious shape
issues, mainly in the fuselage area - the upper fuselage contours are particularly poor, and the nose shape is not good either.
The canopy is not high enough, while the fuselage is too high and the nose leg must too large. Reports are that the optional resin cockpit is
somewhat overscale and requires a great deal of work to fit it into the fuselage. Surface detail appears to be non-existent.

Visitor Comments

16 people have commented on this page. This is comment section 1 of 2.

Mark Hummerstone from Australia

Posted at 5:04am on Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013

Great source of info on all these AC
You might want to have a look at the latest model of a Sea Vixen by a Hong Kong co. called Hobby King.
This one actually flies!
HobbyKing.com

Mike Chaplin from Redditch

Posted at 1:56pm on Thursday, August 23rd, 2012

There is no denying the Airfix 1/48 scale Sea Vixen is a superb kit. The best ever produced. But beware. XS577 - 137 899 NAS did not sport a shark mouth. That was applied to XP922. As 899 NAS prepared to fly off HMS Eagle for the last time there occured the "night of the paint fairies" during which most of the Vixens gained unofficial additional markings such as flowers and some expletive slogans. One Vixen had "For Sale" painted on the wings. On the starboard nose of another a white sto... read more »read more »

Colin Gore from flitwick

Posted at 8:15pm on Monday, December 19th, 2011

my older brother made a solid balsa wood model[from a kit] in the fifties from 1965-1970 i had the enviable task of working on the faw2 with 767,svmu,899,and 890 before my discharge. i now have the enviable task in my retirement of constructing my model. i have many fond memories of my working days.

Gregg Bender from Charles Town, WV

Posted at 1:47am on Saturday, November 19th, 2011

I thought it was just me, as I've been struggling with the XtraKit 1/72 Sea Vixen. It's going very slowly for me. Lots of sanding and fitting. My Xtrakit has a small divot out of the nose which putty and sanding has dealt with. I've been messing with this kit on/off for a few months now, working on fit issues. Attempting to address the shape issues would be beyond my skill. I do think that I can replace some of the resin parts with scratchbuilt plastic, though.

As a kid the DH110 was a name that just rolled off the tongue and was thought to be a fantastic aircraft. 14 or so years later I was cursing the bl**dy thing as every time I went under the tail boom I managed to cut my back on one of the drain taps.Still as a maintainer on the Vic with 8 of em did mean a lot of work!! it was 12 on 12 off at sea when I first joined 893. Airfix must know what a pain in the a*** they were and so left them off the model11

Slim Hewitt from Llanelli

Posted at 12:05am on Saturday, June 18th, 2011

5 and bit years working on Vixen 2's (899 & NASU Brawdy). Where on your models is the red dustbin hanging from the port boom to catch all the fuel drips?

Geoff Pollard from Cornwall

Posted at 6:35pm on Sunday, January 2nd, 2011

After a long and anxious wait I have finally go my hands on two of the new Airfix Vixens. I'm not starting to build them until I see what detailing kits follow the release. A good wingfold and cockpit detailing kit would be brilliant.

Splash Ashdown from Somerset

Posted at 8:52pm on Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

Tim you can now breath it's out in the shops and is a cracking kit.

One error I have spotted is that the Sea Vixen had an air start system and both engines had a large pipe running from the cone on the front of the engine to the side of the air intake.

It was the same on both engines and was in the 4 oclock position, this is missing on the kit but will be very easy to add.

Patrick, I saw the Airfix 1/48th Sea Vixen mock-up on the companies stand at Portsmouth Navy Days, the staff said it should be in the shops by Nov10 (but reelase has been delayed several times already, so I'm not holding my breath)