Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.

If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:

Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.

Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.

Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.

To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.

If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions.This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty.Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept.You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

Delete. 2007 article about a nonexistent country that's not even linked to any page or template. In short, other than its categories, there was no way someone could've had access to it. Also, if it wasn't for the red links, it would have an OK illustration but it also lacks humour so... --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:43, October 20, 2013 (UTC)

Keep. "It will run on ten hydrogen fuel cells smaller than a smartie though it will never melt in you'r hands" in the Intro got my interest. Overlong and needs proofreading but it has a strategy. The Template:Game Consoles ensures that it can be found despite its fictionality. SpıkeѦ23:53 19-Oct-13

Delete. This is an almost verbatim copy of http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html, and links directly to that site as well. As the originating site is copyrighted, this blatant plagiarism is not original content, and outside of our ToS. • Puppy's talk page • 09:59 19 Oct 2013

Delete. Another nonexistent country article from 2006 (edited at the start of this year by new user DerkaDerkaStan). Located beneath Iran, "known to take a dump on each others chests to signify great sex." A photo-less dead end. SpıkeѦ15:50 18-Oct-13

Delete. An article no one is going to look for, except off our Latin America Navigation Template where it reduces the realism of many country articles without increasing their humor. Cute kittens plus a "former Yugoslav republic [that] destroyed the moon." Bonus: A Wacky War. SpıkeѦ11:08 14-Oct-13

Delete. Chapter 2 of a personal fantasy story arc. This one is not even accessible from the nation nav-template (though it is, inexplicably, on Template:Civilization), nor certainly because anyone wants an article on the prehistory of a made-up country. Author Flutter discloses in 2009 that he wrote the article in 2007 but forgot to submit it "here" (going straight to the mirror site?). SpıkeѦ11:14 14-Oct-13

Delete.PuppyOnTheRadio tagged it, after I mentioned it in passing recently, but no one wrote a nomination. This venerable Uncyclopedia tradition, in which we "vote" our most unfavorite Uncyclopedian off the island — all in fun, of course, but with actual gripes never too far below the surface — deserves to go where, I hope, we have succeeded in sending Joke Bans. SpıkeѦ01:01 14-Oct-13

Delete. I have no objection with joke bans, but this page has exceeded its welcome. Ker-kill it. • Puppy's talk page • 07:37 14 Oct 2013

Aaah, it's so hard saying goodbye to one of the most unfunny jokes in Uncyclopedia, Ban <insert name here>, but a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:47, October 14, 2013 (UTC)

I'm sure <insert name here> will remain a valuable part of this community. Assuming we don't decide to ban <insert name here>, of course. • Puppy's talk page • 09:25 17 Oct 2013

I don't think it is funny, considering that it is a fake religion. Anton(talk)Uncyclopedia United 13:34, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Delete. It is a fake religion, with the usual trappings of fake relics and rituals that these articles have. Anton's move of it to Fake religion makes it more likely that someone will find it, but less likely that they will understand it once they get there. There is no humor concept except an absurdly long word, which is a joke that was not done by us but by the movie. SpıkeѦ13:43 5-Oct-13

I don't know if this works or not, but I moved this article to Fake religion. I am not taking back my nomination, in case it does not make it better. Anton(talk)Uncyclopedia United 13:41, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Delete. It started out okay and I was willing to forgive a certain amount of randomness. Halfway through, the rasher of red-links began and the article still had not shown any theme. Finally--a dumb list of memes. SpıkeѦ22:09 4-Oct-13