So. Mother hits some kids and throws some bad words around, one of said kids records it and posts it on the interwebs. Sheriff gets all upset and then says

""This clearly indicates to us that this appears to be a normal way of life," said Judd, who has declared a "zero tolerance" approach to cyber-bullying in his county. "They're laughing and cussing and throwing the F-bomb around, then they're posting that conduct for all to see. It is clear not only has Vosburg demonstrated she cannot control the behaviour of children she has access to without using violence, but she is obviously not monitoring the social media sites of children she has access to either.

"I'm astounded by this conduct, I'm astounded that it was posted and then I'm even more astounded that it stayed there." "

Hey genius.. the mother didn't post the video, and there was no guarantee that the kid was part of her daughters circle of friends to see the video if in fact she checked her Facebook as often as claimed. If you are astounded that the video was posted in the first place, talk to the kid who posted it, if you are even more astounded that it stayed there go talk to that kids parents and bring them up on charges for something or another.

I can't decide if Team Prenda threw Lutz under the bus and he decided to start skipping hearings, or if Lutz missed a trial for some reason or another and Team Prenda decided to blame him first since he wasn't there to defend himself.

We will see how true it is in a few days. If the feds suddenly start screaming and hollering about spying, aiding terrorists, and how they should throw the book at someone (but not CNET! they are after all a 'serious' news agency), then yes, it was a real internal memo. If it was a deliberate leak by higher ups to try and hoodwink criminals, then we will never hear another peep about this since they don't want the possibility of debunking information getting brought up.

They are the Library of Congress and they have a mandate to archive anything and everything they can get their paws on. Why doesn't the head Librarian just say "F You!" and archive it anyway? What are they going to do.. sue the government for doing their job?

They are the Library of Congress and they have a mandate to archive anything and everything they can get their paws on. Why doesn't the head Librarian just say "F You!" and archive it anyway? What are they going to do.. sue the government for doing their job?

The EU Commission are fearful that Google is going to push a US based and foreign company that has relevance to the search to the top and push down a local EU company. But then again, I'm just a user, what do I know?