The truth the Elitist & Zionist corporate media denies or decides to cover up. There will be no political correctness here, I am not a politician, therefore I see no reason I need to be "politically correct". Just opinions and facts that reveal the truth, and expose the hypocrisies of the Elitist & Zionist western world. Opposition to Zionist supremacy Is not Anti-Semetic, It Is Anti-Satanic ! Opposition to thought
control Is not Politically Incorrect
or "Hateful", It Is Pro-Free speech !

"None are more hopelessely enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free"

About Me

Monday, November 19, 2007

Are you tired of being told that “gun control” is a chronic painthat you have to accept because there’s no cure? Do you — a lawabiding person — want to be free: to own whichever firearms youwant to own, regardless of where in America you live; from waitingperiods, gun bans, magazine capacity restrictions, etc.; to spendyour time on the range or in the field, rather than fighting“gun control”?

Are you tired of giving hard earned bucks to efforts that haveat best only slowed the gun grabbers’ push toward firearmsregistration and confiscation? If you have had enough of deathby a thousand cuts, you are ready to take action to wipe out“gun control” — now.

Members of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership(JPFO) consider “gun control” to be an aggressive cancer. JPFOhas a cure, a way to destroy “gun control”. JPFO has hardevidence that shows that the Nazi Weapons Law (March 18, 1938)is the source of the U.S Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA ‘68). AdolphHitler signed the Nazi Weapons Law. The Gestapo (Nazi NationalSecret Police) enforced it. In “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyrannywe present the official German text of the Nazi Weapons Law anda side-by-side translation into English. Even more deadly: a side-by-side, section-by-section comparison of the GCA ‘68 with the NaziWeapons Law. If you have this in your hands, no one can tell youthat you’re imagining things.

The clincher: JPFO knows who implanted into American lawcancerous ideas from the Nazi Weapons Law.

The likely culprit is a former senator, now deceased. We havedocumentary proof — see below — that he had the original textof the Nazi Weapons Law in his possession 4 months before thebill that became GCA ‘68 was signed into law.

This former senator was a senior member of the U.S. team thathelped to prosecute Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, Germany, in1945-46. That is probably where he found out about the NaziWeapons Law. He may have gotten a copy of it then, or at a laterdate. We cannot imagine why any U.S. lawmaker would own originaltexts of Nazi laws. To find out his name, read on.

With this hard evidence in your hands and in your head, you candestroy cancerous “gun control”. You can challenge anyone whobacks “gun control”. You can show them the Nazi ideas, line by line.

The parallels between the Nazi law and GCA ‘68 will leap at youfrom the page. For example, law abiding firearm owners inIllinois, Massachusetts and New Jersey must carry identificationcards based on formats from the Nazi Weapons Law. Nazi basedlaws have no place in America. Thousands of Americans died orwere wounded in the war to wipe out the Nazis. They did notsuffer or die so that Hitler’s ideas could live on in America andkill more Americans. Remember Killeen, Texas! The 23 whodied in Luby’s Cafeteria there died because they obeyed Naziinspired “gun control” laws. The law forced them, unarmed, toface an armed madman.

To destroy “gun control” before more law abiding Americansare murdered by criminals or madmen helped by “gun control”, youneed to get hold of the evidence as presented in “Gun Control”:Gateway to Tyranny. You can then challenge the media, the mostaggressive backers of “gun control”. Ask media personalities in yourcity or town why they back Nazi based laws. You can help to erase“gun control”, Hitler’s last legacy.

GCA ‘68 puts your life at risk right now. You have a constitutionalcivil right to be armed in order to protect yourself, because underU.S law the police have no duty to protect the average person:

“There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state(or Federal) against being murdered by criminals ormadmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect itsresidents against such predators but it does not violatethe due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. TheConstitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state(gov’t) to let people alone; it does not require the federalgovernment or the state to provide services, even soelementary a service as maintaining law and order”(Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit,686F.2d 616 [1982]).

The Supreme Court last dealt with this issue in 1856; the1982 decision states the position in modern language. Thelaws of virtually every state parallel federal law (see JPFOSpecial Report Dial 911 and Die! covered in Guns & Ammo,July 1992). This has been so ever since the Constitutionwas adopted in 1791. As a result, the framers of the SecondAmendment deliberately created (guaranteed) an individualcivil right to be armed. It is your only reliable defense againstcriminals. GCA ‘68 ties your hands and keeps you fromcarrying out your legal duty to ensure your own selfdefense. GCA ‘68 thus undermines a pillar of U.S. law andhelps criminals to kill law abiding Americans. Hitler wouldbe pleased.

Thus, GCA ‘68 marked a new approach to “gun control”. Itreplaced the Federal Firearms Act (June 30, 1938), whichwas based on the federal power to regulate interstatecommerce. The 1938 law required firearms dealers to geta federal license (which then cost $1). Only dealers could shipfirearms across state lines. Ordinary people could receiveshipments from dealers.

In GCA ‘68 the government required that in almost all casesonly dealers could send and receive firearms across statelines. This ended “mail order” sales of firearms by law abidingpersons who are not licensed dealers. GCA ‘68 hits you evenharder. Congress gave federal bureaucrats in Washington D.C.,the power to decide what kinds of firearms you can own. Theframers of GCA ‘68 borrowed an idea — that certain firearmsare “hunting weapons” — from the Nazi Weapons Law (Section21 and Section 32 of the Regulations, page 61 and page 73,respectively, of “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny). Theequivalent U.S. term, “sporting purpose,” was used to classifyfirearms. But it was not defined anywhere in GCA ‘68. Thus,bureaucrats were empowered to ban whole classes offirearms. They have, in fact, done so.

We wanted to know the source of these new ideas. On reading“Dial 911 and Die!” a JPFO member told us he had seen anarticle — by Alan Stang in ‘Review of the News,’ October 4, 1967(pages 15-20) — the author of which felt that the Nazi WeaponsLaw was the model for GCA ‘68. We found the article. But Stangdid not reproduce the Nazi law, so we could not check his conclusions.

We started to hunt for the text of the Nazi Weapons Law. Weeventually found it, in the law library of an Ivy League university.

Until 1943-44, the German government published its laws andregulations in the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt,’ roughly the equivalent ofthe U.S. Federal Register. Carefully shelved by law librarians, the1938 issues of this German government publication had gathereda lot of dust. In the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ issue for the week of March21, 1938, was the official text of the Weapons Law (March 18,1938). It gave Hitler’s Nazi party a stranglehold on the Germans,many of whom did not support the Nazis. We found that the Nazisdid not invent “gun control” in Germany. The Nazis inherited guncontrol and then perfected it: they invented handgun control.

The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms andAmmunition of April 13, 1928. The 1928 law was enacted by acenter-right, freely elected German government that wanted tocurb “gang activity,” violent street fights between Nazi party andCommunist party thugs. All firearm owners and their firearms hadto be registered. Sound familiar? “Gun control” did not savedemocracy in Germany. It helped to make sure that thetoughest criminals, the Nazis, prevailed.

The Nazis inherited lists of firearm owners and their firearms whenthey ‘lawfully’ took over in March 1933. The Nazis used theseinherited registration lists to seize privately held firearms frompersons who were not “reliable.” Knowing exactly who ownedwhich firearms, the Nazis had only to revoke the annual ownershippermits or decline to renew them.

In 1938, five years after taking power, the Nazis enhanced the1928 law. The Nazi Weapons Law introduced handguncontrol. Firearms ownership was restricted to Nazi partymembers and other “reliable” people.

The 1938 Nazi law barred Jews from businesses involvingfirearms. On November 10. 1938 — one day after the Naziparty terror squads (the SS) savaged thousands of Jews,synagogues and Jewish businesses throughout Germany —new regulations under the Weapons Law specifically barredJews from owning any weapons, even clubs or knives.

Given the parallels between the Nazi Weapons Law and theGCA ‘68, we concluded that the framers of the GCA ‘68 —lacking any basis in American law to sharply cut back thecivil rights of law abiding Americans — drew on the NaziWeapons Law of 1938.

Finding the Nazi Weapons Law whetted our appetite. Wewanted to know who implanted this Nazi cancer inAmerica. We began by probing the backgrounds oflawmakers who championed “gun control”. We focusedon those whose bills became part of GCA ‘68. GCA ‘68 asenacted closely tracks proposals dating to August1963. We felt that if the culprit were a lawmaker —or a congressional staffer — he or she would knowGermany, German law and possibly even speakGerman. He or she probably would have spent time inGermany on business or during military service. Alternatively,if the culprit were not a member of Congress or a staffer, therewould be testimony at the hearings to that effect.

Most potential suspects were quickly eliminated; they hadno apparent ties to Germany. But one lawmaker caught our attention.

An old “Who’s Who” entry showed he had been a senior memberof the U.S. team that prosecuted German war criminals at Nurembergin 1945-46. Thus, he had lived in Germany just after the Naziperiod. His official duties required him to look at Nazi records, includingNazi laws. In 1963 he led the effort to greatly expand the FederalFirearms Act of 1938.

We then got a break. We told a legal scholar of our findings. He wasintrigued. He sent us an extract from the record of hearings held afew months prior to the enactment of GCA ‘68. At the end of June1968, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee to investigate JuvenileDelinquency — chaired by Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) — held hearingson bills: (1) “To Require the Registration of Firearms” (S.3604).(2) “To Disarm Lawless Persons” (S.3634) and (3) “To Provide forthe Establishment of a National Firearms Registry” (S.3637),among others.

U.S. Representative John Dingell (D-MI) testified at these Senatehearings on “gun control”. Senator Joseph D. Tydings (D-MD) chairedsome of these hearings, in Dodd’s absence.

Rep. Dingell expressed concern that if firearms registration wererequired, it might lead to confiscation of firearms, as had happenedin Nazi Germany. Tydings angrily accused Rep. Dingell of using“scare tactics”:

“Are you inferring that our system here, gun registration or licensing,would in any way be comparable to the Nazi regime in Germany, wherethey had a secret police, and a complete takeover?”

Rep. Dingell backed away.

(Hearings before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquencyof the Committee on the Judiciary, 90th Congress, 2nd Session, June 26,27 and 28 and July 8, 9 and 10. 1968, pp. 479-80, 505-6 cited asSubcommittee Hearings.)

Tydings later inserted into the hearing record various documents,“concerning the history of Nazism and gun confiscation.”

” … we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weaponsof March 18, 1938, prepared by Dr. William Solyom-Fekete of[the European Law Division — ed.] as well as the Xerox of theoriginal German text which you supplied” (SubcommitteeHearings, p. 489, emphasis added).

This letter makes it public knowledge that at the end of June1968 — 4 months before GCA ‘68 was enacted — SenatorThomas J. Dodd, now deceased, personally owned a copyof the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law.

Why did Dodd own the original German text of anyNazi law? Why did he make known that he owned it?

The Library of Congress then had (and still has) the‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ in its collection. The Library of Congresstranslator, Dr. Solyom-Fekete, could easily have used theLibrary of Congress’ own copy.

Any member of Congress who wanted to read the NaziWeapons Law need only have asked for it to be producedfrom the shelves of the Library of Congress and for it tobe translated by Library of Congress experts. Why shouldany member of Congress ever have owned the originalGerman text of the Nazi Weapons Law?

Dodd could have acquired the German text of theNazi Weapons Law during his time at Nuremberg. Buthe had no need to do so.

Dodd did not personally handle the prosecution of NaziInterior Minister Wilhelm Frick, who signed the NaziWeapons Law. The case against Frick was presentedby Robert M.W. Kempner, Assistant Trial Counsel forthe United States (see ‘Trial of the Major War Criminalsbefore the International Military Tribunal,’ cited asTMWC, Vol. V, pp. 352-67, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947).

Nor should the Nazi Weapons Law otherwise have come toDodd’s attention. The Nazi Weapons Law was not used asevidence against Frick (see Kempner’s speech, TMWC,V, pp. 352-67 and ‘Index of Laws, Decrees, Orders,Directives, and the Administration of Justice in NaziGermany and Nazi Dominated Countries’, TMWC,Vol. XXIII, pp. 430-33). The Nazi Weapons Law isnot listed among documents submitted as evidenceto the Tribunal by the American prosecutors(see Vol. XXIV, pp. 98-169).

The prosecutors at Nuremberg doubtless knew of theNazi Weapons Law. They probably saw it in the‘Reichsgesetzblatt.’ On the same day that Nazi InteriorMinister Frick signed the Weapons Law, March 18, 1938,he signed another law governing security measures innewly annexed Austria. This law concerning Austriaappeared in the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ — directly in frontof the Weapons Law — and was introduced into evidenceat Nuremberg (’Reichsgesetzblatt’ 1938, I, p. 262; theNazi Weapons Law was published in the same volume,p. 265; see TMWC, Vol. V, p.358 for reference to lawconcerning Austria).

Thus, the Nazi Weapons Law appeared to have no historicalmerit at Nuremberg and should not have attracted anyone’snotice, certainly not to the extent of causing anyone to wanto keep a copy of it as a separate document.

If Dodd got his copy of the original German text of the NaziWeapons Law during his time at Nuremberg, it likely waspart of a collection of documents, for example, issues of the‘Reichsgesetzblatt’.

But if he acquired the original German text of the Nazi WeaponsLaw after his service at Nuremberg, he must have done so for avery specific reason. The Nazi Weapons Law plainly did notfigure at Nuremberg.

We may safely conclude it had little, if any, interest for thoseinterested in the history of the Nazis’ rise to power. For example,the Nazi Weapons Law is not mentioned at all in William L. Shirer’svery thorough study of Nazi Germany, ‘The Rise and Fall of theThird Reich’ (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1950).

At the hearings held by Dodd’s subcommittee at the end ofJune 1968, Rep. Dingell had objected to the firearms registrationprovision then being discussed. Dodd may have offered his copyof the Nazi Weapons Law to show that the specific proposal didnot resemble anything in the Nazi law.

He may not have realized that he was revealing a broadertruth; that the whole fabric of GCA ‘68 was based on theNazi Weapons Law, even if the specific registration proposalwas not so based.

Alternatively, Dodd may not have cared whether or notanyone knew that he had the German text of the Nazi WeaponsLaw. He doubtless knew that months would pass before thehearing record was printed and so generally available forscrutiny. Thus, even if anyone then noticed the parallelsbetween the two laws, the bill would already have become law.

Rep. Dingell does not appear to have pursued the matter: thefirearms registration provision was not included in GCA ‘68.The Congress was stampeded on “gun control” by publicenthusiasm. Martin Luther King had been murdered on April 4,1968, and Robert F. Kennedy had been murdered on June 6, 1968.

We are not the first to have seen this hearing record. But weappear to be the first to have recognized its importance. Thishearing record suggests strongly that the late SenatorThomas J. Dodd (D-CT) himself implanted the Nazi WeaponsLaw into American law, or, at very least, helped others to do so.

Now you know the ugly truth about the roots of GCA ‘68. Butyou need to see — with your own eyes — the hard evidence ofthe Nazi roots of “gun control” in America presented in “GunControl”: Gateway to Tyranny.

If you want to destroy “gun control”, you can use this bookto do it.

The Nazi Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, cleared the wayfor World War II and Nazi genocide against the Jews, Gypsies and7,000,000 other people.

No comments:

Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known. What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light: and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matt. 10:26-27