SEC Files Case Against Chinese Company For Misrepresentations Regarding the Use of Its IPO Proceeds

On Monday, April 23, 2012, the SEC announced that it had filed a case against SinoTech Energy Limited, an oil field services company based in China, with intentionally misleading investors about the value of its assets and its use of $120 million in IPO proceeds. The SEC also charged CEO Guoqiang Xin and former CFO Boxun Zhang for their involvement in the fraud. The Complaint, filed in federal court in Louisiana, alleges that the company’s IPO registration statement misled investors about the acquisition and value of a key asset lateral hydraulic drilling units ("LHD Units") that are central to its business. In addition, the SEC charged Qingzeng Liu, SinoTech’s chairman and controlling shareholder, with misappropriating at least $40 million of SinoTech’s cash between June, 2011 and August 2011.

According to the Commission, SinoTech filed an IPO registration statement with the Commission in November, 2010. It described itself as a fast-growing, non-state owned provider of enhanced oil recovery ("EOR") services to major oil companies in China, whose success derived from the use of lateral hydraulic drilling techniques. Its IPO included the sale of nearly 20 million American Depository Shares ("ADS") at a price of $8.50 per share, from which SinoTech raised more than $120 million. The Commission alleged that "SinoTech’s IPO registration statement represented, among other things, that the company would use funds raised in the IPO for two purposes: $51 million to repay a credit line used to purchase LHD Units, and $69 million to purchase additional LHD Units."

The Commission claimed that SinoTech did not use the IPO proceeds as represented, but instead obtained all of its LHD Units from a sole supplier located in Lake Charles, Louisiana. SinoTech contracted to purchase 15 LHD Units (for approximately $18.9 million), but only paid $16 million and only received 11 LHD Units. Moreover, after the IPO, "SinoTech overstated the value of its equipment in numerous filings and press releases."

The Commission also alleged that Mr. Liu, the Chairman of SinoTech, conducted in unauthorized transactions resulting in the withdrawal of approximately $40 million from SinoTech’s bank account (and subsequently confessed to making the withdrawal). The company did record the withdrawal in its books and records and retained Mr. Liu as Chairman despite his confession. The company attempted to hide the theft and rebut an Internet report alleging fraud in August 2011 by issuing a press release that contained false information regarding the company’s balance in its bank accounts.

The SEC’s complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief against all defendants, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains by SinoTech and Mr. Liu, as well as civil penalties against the three individuals. The Commission also director-and-officer bars against each of the individual defendants. All three individuals are residents of China, which may complicate the Commission’s efforts to serve them.

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP offers this blog for general informational purposes only. The content of this blog is not intended as legal advice for any purpose, and you should not consider it as such advice or as a legal opinion on any matters. The information provided herein is subject to change without notice, and you may not rely upon any such information with regard to a particular matter or set of facts. Further, the use of the blog does not create, and is not intended to create, any attorney-client relationship between you and Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP or any individual lawyer in the firm. No such relationship will be considered to have been formed until we have had an opportunity to resolve any conflict of interest issues and have advised you, in writing, of the nature and scope of the legal services to be provided. Unless we establish an attorney-client relationship with you with regard to the particular matter, we will not treat any information that you may send to us, or submit as a comment to a blog article or entry, as confidential or privileged, and any unsolicited communications may be disclosed to other persons without regard to confidentiality considerations. Use of the blog is at your own risk, and the site is provided without warranty of any kind. We make no warranties of any kind regarding the accuracy or completeness of any information on this blog, and we make no representations regarding whether such information is reliable, up-to-date, or applicable to any particular situation. Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP expressly disclaims all liability for actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this blog, or for any damages resulting from your viewing and use of this blog.