Jon St. Jon, the voice of gun-toting Duke Nukem, isn't a fan of firearms in his videogames and certainly not in real-life. The act of killing just to kill "just disturbs" the actor. Racing games over FPS, he says.

The "gratuitous violence" found in big titles like Grand Theft Auto turns Jon St. Jon right off. The iconic Duke Nukem is all for violence and big shooty guns, providing its against invading aliens.

Jon St Jon sounds a little like a hypacrit since his games were always based around violence. And I'm not into terrible games that take years to develop only to disappoint beyond comparison....Hence why Duke Nukem is going for the price of a happy meal brand new right now.

GTA is too old in the gaming world to still be compared as the end all be all of gratuitous violence as well...There are plenty of other games that do more, and even then, I am not offended in the slightest bit by it. Nor are 99.99% of the other gamers out there.

Why is it hypocritical? He doesn't make the games. He takes roles because they pay him. You do remember that voice acting is his job, right?

Besides, most of the violent games he voice-acts for aren't even about killing other humans. Duke Nukem kills aliens, Big the Cat is... well, we don't talk about Big the Cat. Hell, he even did the voice of Daniel Garner in Painkiller HD and even then, you're killing the hell (pun intended) out of demons.

I know he doesn't make the games, but he clearly takes roles that he feels something for (and obviously to get paid for). So if he was vehemently against violence, you would think he wouldn't take on the role of a womanizing, cocky brute who beats aliens into chunks. If Duke had a script where he was fighting humans, I'd bet he would still do the game. There really isn't a difference...

And I'm not dissing his work, I realize he is a respectable voice actor, but a statement like this seems foolish when Duke Nukem bases itself around gratuitous violence. I don't see a gray side here...Violence is violence.