This person is a verified professional.

I feel like Lawful Neutral belongs in Lawful Good's spot, but only if a ticketing system is used. One of the alignments (I'm thinking Chaotic Good, but open to debate) should be "Fixes the issues in order of importance, based on their determination of importance."

This person is a verified professional.

I feel like Lawful Neutral belongs in Lawful Good's spot, but only if a ticketing system is used. One of the alignments (I'm thinking Chaotic Good, but open to debate) should be "Fixes the issues in order of importance, based on their determination of importance."

Lawful good made sure to make the ticket first, but I was trying to go with making Lawful Neutral care about the rule above all. Obviously its a parody though... agree that tickets should be for everyone, which would actually go into the USER alignment chart, because a good user will write a ticket... oh, maybe lawful good teaches the user to write a ticket before working on the ticket?

Yeah, I could make the whole top line stress order of importance a little more, not just ticket/no ticket.

This person is a verified professional.

I guess i would align with chaotic neutral good, I can track most of my jobs without a ticket, and will get to most issues in order that they came in, unless a true emergency has arisen. Otherwise I can be persuaded to help you sooner if you bring me bacon or cookies.

Looks like I am Chaotic good at the moment but one day it would be nice to start ticketing once the chaos is wrangled (making progress). The only tickets I work off of now is when the parent company sends something down or when I need to escalate things to the parent company. Well also when the helpdesk sends over tickets, they live on metrics over there. :)

This person is a verified professional.

if you watch outside xbox on youtube, the new alignment is good, evil, and money. Please redo the chart Su-Zan :)

Since we're all professionals, and therefore get paid for what we do, wouldn't every alignment on here be money?

they were joking it's like a third dimension (money neutral Philantropist) kind of thing, so money lawful good would be Bill Gates?

So then there are three axes? The Law/Chaos axis, the Good/Evil axis, and the Wealth/Destitute axis? I don't think that philanthropy is the opposite of wealth, since Bill Gates is a wealthy philanthropist. Ghandi would have been Lawful Good Destitute, right?

This person is a verified professional.

if you watch outside xbox on youtube, the new alignment is good, evil, and money. Please redo the chart Su-Zan :)

Since we're all professionals, and therefore get paid for what we do, wouldn't every alignment on here be money?

they were joking it's like a third dimension (money neutral Philantropist) kind of thing, so money lawful good would be Bill Gates?

So then there are three axes? The Law/Chaos axis, the Good/Evil axis, and the Wealth/Destitute axis? I don't think that philanthropy is the opposite of wealth, since Bill Gates is a wealthy philanthropist. Ghandi would have been Lawful Good Destitute, right?

I suppose, though the idea was weather you're doing something FOR money, not that you have it. that's why I was thinking philantropy/volunteering/charity was the alternate.

This person is a verified professional.

I'll do one with obsessive and greedy options, since those seem to be what people were missing. I mean, you could argue that greed is just a certain brand of evil and philanthropy kind of blends into good, but we can play it like anal-lawful and greedy but not anti-user. :)

I find it ironic that the box and category text for Lawful Good is a color that my eyes refuse to resolve and is painful to look at. It is like the very concept is so abhorrent to my brain that it refuses to process the term for me. Luckily the text is in white and that I can read.

But that category box, yikes. It's like someone did an extensive study of my particular colorblindness and developed that color just to repel me.