And ahead of their summer training camp, Dyche is looking to add one or two more to the trip, with Troy Deeney and Lukas Jutkiewicz understood to be topping the list.

"There are a couple pending who might be on that trip with us so watch this space," said the Burnley boss.

"It's not a pre-requisite but it's helpful if you've got people with you (before the tour) because it's a great time for them to bed in.

"You're with each other all the time so you get used to each other that bit quicker."

Dyche added: "There's more to come. We've not put a number on it but it's fair to say we ran at a low number last year and we've still got a relatively low number so we are going to need support, competition, the usual stuff really, and the right quality that really is still appropriate for the club, because we don't want to break the club."

Burnley remain in talks with Middlesbrough over Jutkiewicz, but want to secure a double striker swoop by landing Deeney as well.

Clarets boss Sean Dyche has made Watford's top scorer his number one target for the Premier League season.

And he is determined not to be put off by interest from Swansea, who have bettered the offer that Burnley had rejected last week.

The Premier League new boys had a bid believed to be between £5million-£6million turned down by Dyche's former club.

Related links

But the Clarets boss is determined to secure a reunion with the 26-year-old, and supplement his strike force with Jutkiewicz.

It had been suggested that Burnley were turning to Jutkiewicz in the event of being priced out of a Deeney deal, with Watford so reluctant to sell as they plan a promotion assault next season.

But I understand Dyche wants both.

Bolton Wanderers seemed favourites for Jutkiewicz's signature after he impressed on a four-month loan spell at the Reebok Stadium last season.

Derby County also registered an interest.

But it now appears to be a race between Burnley and Wolves, who have come on strong in recent days.

The Clarets have made an offer for Jutkiewicz, believed to be £1.5million, but it has not yet been accepted.

Dyche has already added to his attacking options with the arrival of Marvin Sordell from Bolton.

But with Sam Vokes expected to be sidelined until at least December with the cruciate knee ligament injury that curtailed his season, and only one year left on Danny Ings' contract the Clarets want to ensure they are not short of options.

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?jack01

Are you dingles not worried about the interest in forward players? It does suggest Ings is looking at moving on, but I'm sure the legend ginger douche will bring in some quality league players (not championship)!

What your thoughts little chucky boy?

Are you dingles not worried about the interest in forward players? It does suggest Ings is looking at moving on, but I'm sure the legend ginger douche will bring in some quality league players (not championship)!
What your thoughts little chucky boy?Rovertheedge

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

This is all good , but i believe we need to sign a centre back so id expect that will be one .Theres also the loan players dont forget ..How useful Kightly was last year ! i think we will get some real quality and creativity from the top clubs wating to give there younger players premier experience... so that could be the really interesting one to watch.

This is all good , but i believe we need to sign a centre back so id expect that will be one .Theres also the loan players dont forget ..How useful Kightly was last year ! i think we will get some real quality and creativity from the top clubs wating to give there younger players premier experience... so that could be the really interesting one to watch.Claret72

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?TurfMoorTom

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.jack01

Claret72 wrote:
This is all good , but i believe we need to sign a centre back so id expect that will be one .Theres also the loan players dont forget ..How useful Kightly was last year ! i think we will get some real quality and creativity from the top clubs wating to give there younger players premier experience... so that could be the really interesting one to watch.

We are still looking a Dawson at WBA, that is not dead yet by a long way. On another note its nice to see Rhodes sign a new deal and bleed the ba**ards dry with the extra money he gets every week. FFP beckons soon and the moment of truth will be near. Absolutely blinding

[quote][p][bold]Claret72[/bold] wrote:
This is all good , but i believe we need to sign a centre back so id expect that will be one .Theres also the loan players dont forget ..How useful Kightly was last year ! i think we will get some real quality and creativity from the top clubs wating to give there younger players premier experience... so that could be the really interesting one to watch.[/p][/quote]We are still looking a Dawson at WBA, that is not dead yet by a long way. On another note its nice to see Rhodes sign a new deal and bleed the ba**ards dry with the extra money he gets every week. FFP beckons soon and the moment of truth will be near. Absolutely blindingmjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.

[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Morning where's the other chuckle brother, to me, to you, to me, to you,
Looks like you two are in charge of transfers foe BFC

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Morning where's the other chuckle brother, to me, to you, to me, to you,
Looks like you two are in charge of transfers foe BFCAnotherPounding4Burnley

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?

Up front as he is a forward you intellectually challenged gimp. ust be nothing on day time tv again, whats up no re runs of C Beebies for you to watch, Barry.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?[/p][/quote]Up front as he is a forward you intellectually challenged gimp. ust be nothing on day time tv again, whats up no re runs of C Beebies for you to watch, Barry.mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Morning where's the other chuckle brother, to me, to you, to me, to you,
Looks like you two are in charge of transfers foe BFC

Well its good job you are not in charge of transfers at Deadwood otherwise the front line for you would have been the Krankies, Barry.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Morning where's the other chuckle brother, to me, to you, to me, to you,
Looks like you two are in charge of transfers foe BFC[/p][/quote]Well its good job you are not in charge of transfers at Deadwood otherwise the front line for you would have been the Krankies, Barry.mjp 53

TurfMoorTom wrote:
Shorn Douche is starting to sound a bit frustrated to me.

Just a bit like you and your multiple personas Barry. Did mummy never tell you what your right hand was for. We as a group are frustrated you have not jumped of the Darwen bridge yet, guess there is time.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
Shorn Douche is starting to sound a bit frustrated to me.[/p][/quote]Just a bit like you and your multiple personas Barry. Did mummy never tell you what your right hand was for. We as a group are frustrated you have not jumped of the Darwen bridge yet, guess there is time.mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.Jr11BRFC

This is good news, covering all eventualities. You can't have too many strikers as competition makes for more effort.
Just wondered why a new Burnley story has attracted 50% contribution from the obsessive jealous ones? Is there really so little going on at Bollywood?
Sorry, just answered my own question.

This is good news, covering all eventualities. You can't have too many strikers as competition makes for more effort.
Just wondered why a new Burnley story has attracted 50% contribution from the obsessive jealous ones? Is there really so little going on at Bollywood?
Sorry, just answered my own question.houseclaret

Smells of one thing and one thing only to me.
Q. Why has Ings not resigned yet? We keep hearing it is about to happen but it hasn't.
Q. We are persistently linked with strikers, why if Ings is staying put?
Q. If Ings did see out his contract then we would get compensation due to his age at the end of it - has BFC board yet to work that out.
Q. Are the Burnley board interested to pay Ings a prem wage in the hope his goals might keep us up?
A. All pointing in one direction to me, hope I'm wrong as he is one of the best I have seen at Burnley since Trevor Steven.

Smells of one thing and one thing only to me.
Q. Why has Ings not resigned yet? We keep hearing it is about to happen but it hasn't.
Q. We are persistently linked with strikers, why if Ings is staying put?
Q. If Ings did see out his contract then we would get compensation due to his age at the end of it - has BFC board yet to work that out.
Q. Are the Burnley board interested to pay Ings a prem wage in the hope his goals might keep us up?
A. All pointing in one direction to me, hope I'm wrong as he is one of the best I have seen at Burnley since Trevor Steven.McClaret

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And sorry, you are a 1 man team then, are you?

[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And sorry, you are a 1 man team then, are you?mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?

touche with knobs on hahahaha! nice one tmt.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?[/p][/quote]touche with knobs on hahahaha! nice one tmt.eddio

Well it seems that posts have not been thought through, again. Three forwards on the pitch would require at least two on the bench. But let's not try to guess, all will be revealed once the season starts.

Well it seems that posts have not been thought through, again. Three forwards on the pitch would require at least two on the bench. But let's not try to guess, all will be revealed once the season starts.u owe u owe

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperatejim 2012

Quick question for all you Blackburn goons that infest every Burnley article:

Would you like to swap places with Burnley and be starting next season in the Premier League?

If you answer Yes, then at least you are admitting your jealousy.

If you answer NO, then you are lying.

It's OK to admit your jealousy of LANCASHIRE'S NUMBER ONE CLUB, It may help you come to terms with the fact that you now support a mid-table Second Division pile of rubbish and your rivals are one of the best 20 teams in the country.

Ouch, no wonder you are all so bitter and twisted.

Quick question for all you Blackburn goons that infest every Burnley article:
Would you like to swap places with Burnley and be starting next season in the Premier League?
If you answer Yes, then at least you are admitting your jealousy.
If you answer NO, then you are lying.
It's OK to admit your jealousy of LANCASHIRE'S NUMBER ONE CLUB, It may help you come to terms with the fact that you now support a mid-table Second Division pile of rubbish and your rivals are one of the best 20 teams in the country.
Ouch, no wonder you are all so bitter and twisted.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word "excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?

[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate[/p][/quote]Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word "excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?houseclaret

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.Jr11BRFC

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
Torvil and Deeney will replace Ings and be Burnleys equivalent of SAS

Good lad well done. The fessed up man is as good a his word. Out and batting for Rovers.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
Torvil and Deeney will replace Ings and be Burnleys equivalent of SAS[/p][/quote]Good lad well done. The fessed up man is as good a his word. Out and batting for Rovers.Rob_H2O

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?

Up front as he is a forward you intellectually challenged gimp. ust be nothing on day time tv again, whats up no re runs of C Beebies for you to watch, Barry.

Good answer. Not. Re-read the post and ask youself what you've got wrong. Then go and sit in the stupid corner for the afternoon.

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Apparently not - where does Jutkewitz fit in to your equation bright spark?[/p][/quote]Up front as he is a forward you intellectually challenged gimp. ust be nothing on day time tv again, whats up no re runs of C Beebies for you to watch, Barry.[/p][/quote]Good answer. Not. Re-read the post and ask youself what you've got wrong. Then go and sit in the stupid corner for the afternoon.TurfMoorTom

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And sorry, you are a 1 man team then, are you?

strangely enough he didn't get player of the year. Conway is just as important within the team as well as marshall cairney and a number of others. A one man team we are no more.

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And sorry, you are a 1 man team then, are you?[/p][/quote]strangely enough he didn't get player of the year. Conway is just as important within the team as well as marshall cairney and a number of others. A one man team we are no more.Jr11BRFC

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.

Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.[/p][/quote]Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.Harwoodstblue

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.

No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.

He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.

[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.[/p][/quote]And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.
No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.
He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.

Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.

Yeah and it has cost you your ENTIRE transfer budget for this summer - and with FFP looming this summer was your last chance to recruit players before the inevitable embargo happens.

Ouch, the life of a Second Division club eh?

[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.[/p][/quote]Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.[/p][/quote]Yeah and it has cost you your ENTIRE transfer budget for this summer - and with FFP looming this summer was your last chance to recruit players before the inevitable embargo happens.
Ouch, the life of a Second Division club eh?Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage

the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:

HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage
the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:
HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhousehasslem hasslem

Another day another chance for the skid mark kids of Blackburn to leave their usual stain on anything to do with BFC. Is there a story the trolls won't comment on? Is their attention seeking limited to football or do they have other obsessions, stalk other websites and direct their inner mental anguish and social autism on other subjects? All the signs point in one direction so would you pervs - for that's what you really are -like to explain why you spend so much time and energy on a club you don't even support?

Another day another chance for the skid mark kids of Blackburn to leave their usual stain on anything to do with BFC. Is there a story the trolls won't comment on? Is their attention seeking limited to football or do they have other obsessions, stalk other websites and direct their inner mental anguish and social autism on other subjects? All the signs point in one direction so would you pervs - for that's what you really are -like to explain why you spend so much time and energy on a club you don't even support?Claretcert

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word &quot;excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?

Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the country to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.

[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate[/p][/quote]Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word "excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?[/p][/quote]Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the country to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.Harwoodstblue

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.

No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.

He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.

The funny thing is, you are probably one of the people who constantly stated that Rhodes was leaving every transfer window. Yet now he isn't good enough to leave, I think I'm missing something there.

Hopeless at playing up top on his own... He did that for a full season and scored 28 goals. This was all down to his movement, awareness ad finishing. If you watch Rovers week in week out then I will listen to your point but I don't think you do. As such I can't comment on Ings as I don't exactly think the FL show do much justice for showcasing talent.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.[/p][/quote]And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.
No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.
He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.[/p][/quote]The funny thing is, you are probably one of the people who constantly stated that Rhodes was leaving every transfer window. Yet now he isn't good enough to leave, I think I'm missing something there.
Hopeless at playing up top on his own... He did that for a full season and scored 28 goals. This was all down to his movement, awareness ad finishing. If you watch Rovers week in week out then I will listen to your point but I don't think you do. As such I can't comment on Ings as I don't exactly think the FL show do much justice for showcasing talent.Jr11BRFC

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage

the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:

HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.

I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.

[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage
the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:
HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/p][/quote]I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.
I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.

No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.

He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.

£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.[/p][/quote]And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.
No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.
He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.[/p][/quote]£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.Harwoodstblue

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.

Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.

Yeah and it has cost you your ENTIRE transfer budget for this summer - and with FFP looming this summer was your last chance to recruit players before the inevitable embargo happens.

Ouch, the life of a Second Division club eh?

I wasn't speaking to you. Get back in your box muppet.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.[/p][/quote]Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.[/p][/quote]Yeah and it has cost you your ENTIRE transfer budget for this summer - and with FFP looming this summer was your last chance to recruit players before the inevitable embargo happens.
Ouch, the life of a Second Division club eh?[/p][/quote]I wasn't speaking to you. Get back in your box muppet.Harwoodstblue

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word &quot;excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?

Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the&nbsp;country&nbs
p;to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.

I wasn't quite sure why you got stick for wanting rid of that waste of space, I would have been the same had he been at Burnley. What did surprise me (and this is obviously Venky's fault) is that you got rid of him when you were actually doing rather well in the championship. They actually sacked 2 managers who were not doing a bad job at the time of their demise.
I agree though, Keane was rubbish.

[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate[/p][/quote]Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word "excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?[/p][/quote]Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the country&nbs
p;to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.[/p][/quote]I wasn't quite sure why you got stick for wanting rid of that waste of space, I would have been the same had he been at Burnley. What did surprise me (and this is obviously Venky's fault) is that you got rid of him when you were actually doing rather well in the championship. They actually sacked 2 managers who were not doing a bad job at the time of their demise.
I agree though, Keane was rubbish.houseclaret

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.

Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.

Oh yes and Dunn has signed a mega bucks new one year deal, which, by the way includes a free bucket of chicken every week for the fat ba**ard.. Rhodes and Dunn sucking your club dry for another season. You may have them off your pay roll but you had to pay them off to do it, so in laymans terms IT COST YOU. They all now have beach houses in the Caymans thanks to the Bas**rds generosity. The SS Deadwood slowly sinking into oblivion.

[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.[/p][/quote]Your intelligence shows no bounds !!!!
Aren't these the ones we want OFF the pay roll?
Keep up and get the facts right.[/p][/quote]Oh yes and Dunn has signed a mega bucks new one year deal, which, by the way includes a free bucket of chicken every week for the fat ba**ard.. Rhodes and Dunn sucking your club dry for another season. You may have them off your pay roll but you had to pay them off to do it, so in laymans terms IT COST YOU. They all now have beach houses in the Caymans thanks to the Bas**rds generosity. The SS Deadwood slowly sinking into oblivion.mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.

No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.

He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.

£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.

Well you obviously don't know then. Norwich were sniffing round and willing to offer him a better deal, so he went back to Rovers and got a wage increase and a better deal. That's what players do, Craig Bryson is the perfect example. Probably got a free bucket of chicken wings every week as well as part of the deal, that probably sealed it for him.

[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.[/p][/quote]And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.
No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.
He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.[/p][/quote]£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.[/p][/quote]Well you obviously don't know then. Norwich were sniffing round and willing to offer him a better deal, so he went back to Rovers and got a wage increase and a better deal. That's what players do, Craig Bryson is the perfect example. Probably got a free bucket of chicken wings every week as well as part of the deal, that probably sealed it for him.mjp 53

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage

the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:

HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.

I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.

7 postings by yourself, so far, on today's jordan rhodes story. this means that you are well ahead (in terms of volume of contributions, not quality - or intellect) of any other poster on that story

if anybody is a goon - it is you for your own obsessive compulsion with BRFC and then making the same accusation of those who follow rovers on these pages. as you will know (from your regular contributions on rovers pages) that often a story is suffocated by over half of the postings from, so called, burnley supporters....althou
gh admittedly most of these come from one clown with its own mulitple sign-ins.

there was a time when hardly any rovers supporters said anything on burnley pages - but the ignorant clown that calls themselves "we luv you venkys", "jack walker is dead", "super claret" among other monikers is responsible for most of the rovers contributions on these pages as an act of retaliation.

that idiot has, single-handedly ruined both rovers pages and these pages and it just descends into pathetic mindless "my dad is bigger than your dad" nonsense.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage
the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:
HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/p][/quote]I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.
I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.[/p][/quote]7 postings by yourself, so far, on today's jordan rhodes story. this means that you are well ahead (in terms of volume of contributions, not quality - or intellect) of any other poster on that story
if anybody is a goon - it is you for your own obsessive compulsion with BRFC and then making the same accusation of those who follow rovers on these pages. as you will know (from your regular contributions on rovers pages) that often a story is suffocated by over half of the postings from, so called, burnley supporters....althou
gh admittedly most of these come from one clown with its own mulitple sign-ins.
there was a time when hardly any rovers supporters said anything on burnley pages - but the ignorant clown that calls themselves "we luv you venkys", "jack walker is dead", "super claret" among other monikers is responsible for most of the rovers contributions on these pages as an act of retaliation.
that idiot has, single-handedly ruined both rovers pages and these pages and it just descends into pathetic mindless "my dad is bigger than your dad" nonsense.hasslem hasslem

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage

the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:

HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.

I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.

Oh would you just stop whinging. We'll never like each other and as everyone knows it's not much fun to kick someone when they're down which is where you've been for the last decade or 4, so take it as a bit of a compliment. We'll stop giving you a kicking by around early March. That's if your conduct as individual fans and club as a whole isn't still comedy gold. So lets just see.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage
the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:
HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/p][/quote]I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.
I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.[/p][/quote]Oh would you just stop whinging. We'll never like each other and as everyone knows it's not much fun to kick someone when they're down which is where you've been for the last decade or 4, so take it as a bit of a compliment. We'll stop giving you a kicking by around early March. That's if your conduct as individual fans and club as a whole isn't still comedy gold. So lets just see.TurfMoorTom

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage

the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:

HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.

I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.

Oh would you just stop whinging. We'll never like each other and as everyone knows it's not much fun to kick someone when they're down which is where you've been for the last decade or 4, so take it as a bit of a compliment. We'll stop giving you a kicking by around early March. That's if your conduct as individual fans and club as a whole isn't still comedy gold. So lets just see.

Barry do us all a favour and go do your washing and ironing for the day. Havent you got a dress to go and buy for yourself too.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage
the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:
HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/p][/quote]I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.
I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.[/p][/quote]Oh would you just stop whinging. We'll never like each other and as everyone knows it's not much fun to kick someone when they're down which is where you've been for the last decade or 4, so take it as a bit of a compliment. We'll stop giving you a kicking by around early March. That's if your conduct as individual fans and club as a whole isn't still comedy gold. So lets just see.[/p][/quote]Barry do us all a favour and go do your washing and ironing for the day. Havent you got a dress to go and buy for yourself too.mjp 53

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word &quot;excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?

Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the&nbsp;country&amp
;nbs
p;to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.

I wasn't quite sure why you got stick for wanting rid of that waste of space, I would have been the same had he been at Burnley. What did surprise me (and this is obviously Venky's fault) is that you got rid of him when you were actually doing rather well in the championship. They actually sacked 2 managers who were not doing a bad job at the time of their demise.
I agree though, Keane was rubbish.

I know it looked strange to the outsider to sack him when we did House Claret but our league position was deceiving. We were playing awfully at the time and any intelligent football fan could see it couldn't last. We were in a false position footballing wise and I'll never know how we amassed those points before he was sacked.
I agree about the next two managers , two more monumental blunders by Venkys / Singh.

[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate[/p][/quote]Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word "excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?[/p][/quote]Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the country&amp
;nbs
p;to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.[/p][/quote]I wasn't quite sure why you got stick for wanting rid of that waste of space, I would have been the same had he been at Burnley. What did surprise me (and this is obviously Venky's fault) is that you got rid of him when you were actually doing rather well in the championship. They actually sacked 2 managers who were not doing a bad job at the time of their demise.
I agree though, Keane was rubbish.[/p][/quote]I know it looked strange to the outsider to sack him when we did House Claret but our league position was deceiving. We were playing awfully at the time and any intelligent football fan could see it couldn't last. We were in a false position footballing wise and I'll never know how we amassed those points before he was sacked.
I agree about the next two managers , two more monumental blunders by Venkys / Singh.Harwoodstblue

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage

the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:

HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse

I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.

I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.

7 postings by yourself, so far, on today's jordan rhodes story. this means that you are well ahead (in terms of volume of contributions, not quality - or intellect) of any other poster on that story

if anybody is a goon - it is you for your own obsessive compulsion with BRFC and then making the same accusation of those who follow rovers on these pages. as you will know (from your regular contributions on rovers pages) that often a story is suffocated by over half of the postings from, so called, burnley supporters....althou

gh admittedly most of these come from one clown with its own mulitple sign-ins.

there was a time when hardly any rovers supporters said anything on burnley pages - but the ignorant clown that calls themselves &quot;we luv you venkys", "jack walker is dead", "super claret" among other monikers is responsible for most of the rovers contributions on these pages as an act of retaliation.

that idiot has, single-handedly ruined both rovers pages and these pages and it just descends into pathetic mindless "my dad is bigger than your dad" nonsense.

I will agree with you there, but isn't he one of yours in the way of a Rovers fan. Senile dementia springs to mind when I think of Mr or Mrs multiple personas. Turf Moor Tranny, Fake T*ts, Another Pounding from behind, this guy/woman is deluded beyond belief and no mental facility in their own right would take him on as a patient, its gone beyond that.

[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]funny - how you seem to have no problems posting many times on every rovers story your usual garbage
the word hypocrite is defined in the OED thus:
HYPOCRITE: 1) Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/p][/quote]I am merely keeping the balance up - if you look on your average Burnley report there are a minimum of five or six Blackburn neanderthals posting their jealous bile.
I have no problems at all posting on the Blackburn stories - what's good for the goose etc etc, the ratio though of jealous Blackburn fans on the Burnley articles in comparison though is pretty staggering - It seems that because we are PREMIER LEAGUE some of you goons are just drawn to post - it must be the fact that you are missing playing there - such a shame.[/p][/quote]7 postings by yourself, so far, on today's jordan rhodes story. this means that you are well ahead (in terms of volume of contributions, not quality - or intellect) of any other poster on that story
if anybody is a goon - it is you for your own obsessive compulsion with BRFC and then making the same accusation of those who follow rovers on these pages. as you will know (from your regular contributions on rovers pages) that often a story is suffocated by over half of the postings from, so called, burnley supporters....althou
gh admittedly most of these come from one clown with its own mulitple sign-ins.
there was a time when hardly any rovers supporters said anything on burnley pages - but the ignorant clown that calls themselves "we luv you venkys", "jack walker is dead", "super claret" among other monikers is responsible for most of the rovers contributions on these pages as an act of retaliation.
that idiot has, single-handedly ruined both rovers pages and these pages and it just descends into pathetic mindless "my dad is bigger than your dad" nonsense.[/p][/quote]I will agree with you there, but isn't he one of yours in the way of a Rovers fan. Senile dementia springs to mind when I think of Mr or Mrs multiple personas. Turf Moor Tranny, Fake T*ts, Another Pounding from behind, this guy/woman is deluded beyond belief and no mental facility in their own right would take him on as a patient, its gone beyond that.mjp 53

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.

No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.

He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.

£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.

Well you obviously don't know then. Norwich were sniffing round and willing to offer him a better deal, so he went back to Rovers and got a wage increase and a better deal. That's what players do, Craig Bryson is the perfect example. Probably got a free bucket of chicken wings every week as well as part of the deal, that probably sealed it for him.

"Probably" There are a lot of probabilities with you
It's strange how you know the exact details of of Rhodes' contract less than 24 hours after he signed it. Stop bulls******g and just stick to what you know..

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.[/p][/quote]And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.
No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.
He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.[/p][/quote]£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.[/p][/quote]Well you obviously don't know then. Norwich were sniffing round and willing to offer him a better deal, so he went back to Rovers and got a wage increase and a better deal. That's what players do, Craig Bryson is the perfect example. Probably got a free bucket of chicken wings every week as well as part of the deal, that probably sealed it for him.[/p][/quote]"Probably" There are a lot of probabilities with you
It's strange how you know the exact details of of Rhodes' contract less than 24 hours after he signed it. Stop bulls******g and just stick to what you know..Harwoodstblue

OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.

OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.Claretcert

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word &quot;excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?

Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the&nbsp;country&amp
;
;nbs
p;to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.

I wasn't quite sure why you got stick for wanting rid of that waste of space, I would have been the same had he been at Burnley. What did surprise me (and this is obviously Venky's fault) is that you got rid of him when you were actually doing rather well in the championship. They actually sacked 2 managers who were not doing a bad job at the time of their demise.
I agree though, Keane was rubbish.

I know it looked strange to the outsider to sack him when we did House Claret but our league position was deceiving. We were playing awfully at the time and any intelligent football fan could see it couldn't last. We were in a false position footballing wise and I'll never know how we amassed those points before he was sacked.
I agree about the next two managers , two more monumental blunders by Venkys / Singh.

What is your take on the Venky situation though. Your finances are obviously in an awful state but if you got rid of Venkys wouldn't you be in a far worse, possibly dangerous position financially? There is a term in chess called zugzwang, meaning that any move you make is a bad one. What would you really like to see?

[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate[/p][/quote]Hi Jim,
Could you point out any similarity between Sean Dyche and Steve Keane? Perhaps you could elaborate on this. On the one hand you have a man who has achieved auto-promotion on a shoe string budget whilst getting the most out of the players he inherited. On the other you have a man who took a team from a respectable mid-table position to relegation in a very similar amount of time. On the one hand you have a man who never makes excuses and moves swiftly on after setbacks. On the other you have a man who almost invented the word "excuse".
I would be very interested to hear how you justify the comparison. Especially as I don't feel any sense of desperation whatsoever from Dyche. Is this just another Rovers wish list?[/p][/quote]Your description of Kean is exactly how we at Blackburn saw him but were lambasted by the national press for wanting him out. He was nothing but an impostor at the football club and we could all see it. He had to leave the country&amp
;
;nbs
p;to get another job in football. There's no comparison between him and Dyche.[/p][/quote]I wasn't quite sure why you got stick for wanting rid of that waste of space, I would have been the same had he been at Burnley. What did surprise me (and this is obviously Venky's fault) is that you got rid of him when you were actually doing rather well in the championship. They actually sacked 2 managers who were not doing a bad job at the time of their demise.
I agree though, Keane was rubbish.[/p][/quote]I know it looked strange to the outsider to sack him when we did House Claret but our league position was deceiving. We were playing awfully at the time and any intelligent football fan could see it couldn't last. We were in a false position footballing wise and I'll never know how we amassed those points before he was sacked.
I agree about the next two managers , two more monumental blunders by Venkys / Singh.[/p][/quote]What is your take on the Venky situation though. Your finances are obviously in an awful state but if you got rid of Venkys wouldn't you be in a far worse, possibly dangerous position financially? There is a term in chess called zugzwang, meaning that any move you make is a bad one. What would you really like to see?houseclaret

Claretcert wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.

don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.

[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.[/p][/quote]don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.hasslem hasslem

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.

And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.

No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.

He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.

£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.

Well you obviously don't know then. Norwich were sniffing round and willing to offer him a better deal, so he went back to Rovers and got a wage increase and a better deal. That's what players do, Craig Bryson is the perfect example. Probably got a free bucket of chicken wings every week as well as part of the deal, that probably sealed it for him.

&quot;Probably" There are a lot of probabilities with you
It's strange how you know the exact details of of Rhodes' contract less than 24 hours after he signed it. Stop bulls******g and just stick to what you know..

Shouldn't you be planning your massive away day to Telford tomorrow. Top game for you lot, you might actually get a draw.

[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]I don't think I mentioned anything of our position. If you can read I was simply just stating the fact that our two main strikers are far more potent then 'league 1 cast offs'. I don't see the need to side track from the discussion I was having with you. Also I think your missing the fact that e had Gestede for half a season, relying on Rhodes for the first half of the season. Taking that into consideration I think maybe we would have made it into the play-offs but that is irrelevant in this discussion as it was not about league positions it was about the class of our players. We have been far from impressive on the pitch in the past 2 seasons yet Rhodes has managed to be the highest scoring Championship player over the last two years by 10 goals.[/p][/quote]And where has this got Rhodes? a £50k a week deal with a mid-table Second Division club - wow such ambition.
No other Championship club will ever match his wages, so his transfer value is almost irrelevant. And no Premier League club will ever sign him as he has neither the pace or power to play there. He's fairly hopeless at leading the line or playing up on his own, even in the division below.
He's obviously decided he is going to make as much money bumming around in the 2nd division rather than expose himself for the average player he is by testing himself at the very highest level.[/p][/quote]£ 50,000 a week ? And where did you get that from Einstein?
According to others more 'in the know' than you he merely asked for an extension to his contract which suited both parties.[/p][/quote]Well you obviously don't know then. Norwich were sniffing round and willing to offer him a better deal, so he went back to Rovers and got a wage increase and a better deal. That's what players do, Craig Bryson is the perfect example. Probably got a free bucket of chicken wings every week as well as part of the deal, that probably sealed it for him.[/p][/quote]"Probably" There are a lot of probabilities with you
It's strange how you know the exact details of of Rhodes' contract less than 24 hours after he signed it. Stop bulls******g and just stick to what you know..[/p][/quote]Shouldn't you be planning your massive away day to Telford tomorrow. Top game for you lot, you might actually get a draw.mjp 53

Claretcert wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.

don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.

That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.

[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.[/p][/quote]don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.[/p][/quote]That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.mjp 53

Claretcert wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.

don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.

That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.

It's nice to know that he doesn't seem to have any friends anywhere. I don't go to Rovers stories (apart from "common interest stories") but surely there is no-one from our side as bad as that idiot? It's got so bad now that it appears (I don't read the actual content) that he has created so many personalities so that he can "answer" his own posts. That is actually quite sad or even dangerous. Talking to your multiple selves in print and online seems to me one step away from certifiable. I've got to the point that if it wasn't annoying in the way it takes up space on a story I would feel quite sorry for him/her.
I'm beginning to think that if we all ignored him/her they would still mumble away to themselves. It's no wonder they have now got the additional name of Gollum on our stories.

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.[/p][/quote]don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.[/p][/quote]That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.[/p][/quote]It's nice to know that he doesn't seem to have any friends anywhere. I don't go to Rovers stories (apart from "common interest stories") but surely there is no-one from our side as bad as that idiot? It's got so bad now that it appears (I don't read the actual content) that he has created so many personalities so that he can "answer" his own posts. That is actually quite sad or even dangerous. Talking to your multiple selves in print and online seems to me one step away from certifiable. I've got to the point that if it wasn't annoying in the way it takes up space on a story I would feel quite sorry for him/her.
I'm beginning to think that if we all ignored him/her they would still mumble away to themselves. It's no wonder they have now got the additional name of Gollum on our stories.houseclaret

The only way is down. enjoy your temporary lofty position while it lasts for your sure to drop like the proverbial stone back to whence you came .There is only room for one big club in east Lancashire and that is Blackburn Rovers. oh and don,t bother coming back with that who is in the prem now ? l have already explained the facts and l am not in the habit of repeating myself like you lot seem to be obsessed with. B R F C and that,s all you need to know.

[quote][p][bold]BassMonroe[/bold] wrote:
League 1 only has so many players!
Burnley FC - Relegated 2015[/p][/quote]The only way is down. enjoy your temporary lofty position while it lasts for your sure to drop like the proverbial stone back to whence you came .There is only room for one big club in east Lancashire and that is Blackburn Rovers. oh and don,t bother coming back with that who is in the prem now ? l have already explained the facts and l am not in the habit of repeating myself like you lot seem to be obsessed with. B R F C and that,s all you need to know.noddy57

Claretcert wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.

don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.

That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.

It's nice to know that he doesn't seem to have any friends anywhere. I don't go to Rovers stories (apart from &quot;common interest stories") but surely there is no-one from our side as bad as that idiot? It's got so bad now that it appears (I don't read the actual content) that he has created so many personalities so that he can "answer" his own posts. That is actually quite sad or even dangerous. Talking to your multiple selves in print and online seems to me one step away from certifiable. I've got to the point that if it wasn't annoying in the way it takes up space on a story I would feel quite sorry for him/her.
I'm beginning to think that if we all ignored him/her they would still mumble away to themselves. It's no wonder they have now got the additional name of Gollum on our stories.

sorry but you are both wrong - the idiot that calls him/herself super claret has been prattling on on rovers pages since before christmas.

it has even posted on rovers pages whilst dingles have been playing a night match at home!!!! that is how much of an OCDingle it is. Sometimes the sad individual posts as many as 25-30 postings on one rovers story and will often be the first on at 9am and still be posting stuff after midnight.

various rovers posters have had its sign-ins banned but as all you need to is re-register then it appears again instantly. its finest moment is its legendary "jack walker is dead" sign-in. surely even your most ardent dingle must disown it.

[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.[/p][/quote]don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.[/p][/quote]That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.[/p][/quote]It's nice to know that he doesn't seem to have any friends anywhere. I don't go to Rovers stories (apart from "common interest stories") but surely there is no-one from our side as bad as that idiot? It's got so bad now that it appears (I don't read the actual content) that he has created so many personalities so that he can "answer" his own posts. That is actually quite sad or even dangerous. Talking to your multiple selves in print and online seems to me one step away from certifiable. I've got to the point that if it wasn't annoying in the way it takes up space on a story I would feel quite sorry for him/her.
I'm beginning to think that if we all ignored him/her they would still mumble away to themselves. It's no wonder they have now got the additional name of Gollum on our stories.[/p][/quote]sorry but you are both wrong - the idiot that calls him/herself super claret has been prattling on on rovers pages since before christmas.
it has even posted on rovers pages whilst dingles have been playing a night match at home!!!! that is how much of an OCDingle it is. Sometimes the sad individual posts as many as 25-30 postings on one rovers story and will often be the first on at 9am and still be posting stuff after midnight.
various rovers posters have had its sign-ins banned but as all you need to is re-register then it appears again instantly. its finest moment is its legendary "jack walker is dead" sign-in. surely even your most ardent dingle must disown it.hasslem hasslem

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.

Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:

Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes

Are you simple?

Yes I must be simple.

If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?

Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.

Unless of course somebody is leaving.

If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.

hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.

And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?

What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?

Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.

Ha ha ha ha deluded.

burnley are still 4/7 to be relegated from premier league
with or with out your world class signings

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Jr11BRFC[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]We need to have FOUR strikers going into the new season.
Vokes is OUT until probably next year at the earliest which leaves:
Ings
Deeney
Sordell
Barnes
Are you simple?[/p][/quote]Yes I must be simple.
If you need or want four strikers and you already have four, why are you trying to sign two more?
Even if you take the Vokes injury into consideration you would then still have five competing for two places.
Unless of course somebody is leaving.[/p][/quote]If Ings goes and he probably will it will be money well spent replacing him with Deeney. A dam sight better than your front line, made up of league 1 players and championship cast offs.[/p][/quote]hahahahahaha. hahahaha. hahahahaha. hahahahahaha. Sorry are you mjp are you forgetting that we have the best striker in the championship. As well as a player who joined from Cardiff when they were a prem club, this would make him a premier league cast off you imbecile. Considering he scored 12 goals in 21 games... 6 of those coming in the final 3 games, I would take him over sordell anyday.[/p][/quote]And tell me goon, these brilliantly efficient strikers that you have - what position did they fire you to last year then, I assume it was at least a play-off place?
What's that? Your highest position all season was eighth? EIGHTH?
Wow, just wow no wonder the bookies have you down to finish a massive tenth place next season with your firepower.
Ha ha ha ha deluded.[/p][/quote]burnley are still 4/7 to be relegated from premier league
with or with out your world class signingsjim 2012

Claretcert wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.

don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.

That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.

It's nice to know that he doesn't seem to have any friends anywhere. I don't go to Rovers stories (apart from &quot;common interest stories") but surely there is no-one from our side as bad as that idiot? It's got so bad now that it appears (I don't read the actual content) that he has created so many personalities so that he can "answer" his own posts. That is actually quite sad or even dangerous. Talking to your multiple selves in print and online seems to me one step away from certifiable. I've got to the point that if it wasn't annoying in the way it takes up space on a story I would feel quite sorry for him/her.
I'm beginning to think that if we all ignored him/her they would still mumble away to themselves. It's no wonder they have now got the additional name of Gollum on our stories.

sorry but you are both wrong - the idiot that calls him/herself super claret has been prattling on on rovers pages since before christmas.

it has even posted on rovers pages whilst dingles have been playing a night match at home!!!! that is how much of an OCDingle it is. Sometimes the sad individual posts as many as 25-30 postings on one rovers story and will often be the first on at 9am and still be posting stuff after midnight.

various rovers posters have had its sign-ins banned but as all you need to is re-register then it appears again instantly. its finest moment is its legendary "jack walker is dead" sign-in. surely even your most ardent dingle must disown it.

Can't comment on Super Claret but does he post under many names to fool people into answering him?

[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Claretcert[/bold] wrote:
OK so Blackburn fans (trolls) appear to be waving a yah boo stick with a photo of Rhodes on it at Burnley fans who mostly seem to be saying he's a good player at that level but must be costing the club a lot on wages, although no-one really knows what. Under a story about BFC transferd - again - what are you goons doing here? Every hour, every day, every week you cannot for a second stop obsessing about a club you don't support. Rhodes is great, inder a LET article about him signing almost all the comments were about Burnley, how this linked to ambition, about Ings even. This is no coincidence, the whole town (Blackburn) appears to have gone Burnley crazy. Your lives revolve around our club it seems.[/p][/quote]don't be stupid - look at rovers pages - the main contributors for the last 12 months have been your fellow burnley chums - that is what has led to the osmotic migration of rovers supporters onto these pages - if you don't understand this then you are as bad as the trolls who infect both club's pages.[/p][/quote]That is where you are wrong, its been your self obsessed friend Super Claret, Turf Moor Tom, who has been posting on your pages. He has got nothing to do with us, thank god.[/p][/quote]It's nice to know that he doesn't seem to have any friends anywhere. I don't go to Rovers stories (apart from "common interest stories") but surely there is no-one from our side as bad as that idiot? It's got so bad now that it appears (I don't read the actual content) that he has created so many personalities so that he can "answer" his own posts. That is actually quite sad or even dangerous. Talking to your multiple selves in print and online seems to me one step away from certifiable. I've got to the point that if it wasn't annoying in the way it takes up space on a story I would feel quite sorry for him/her.
I'm beginning to think that if we all ignored him/her they would still mumble away to themselves. It's no wonder they have now got the additional name of Gollum on our stories.[/p][/quote]sorry but you are both wrong - the idiot that calls him/herself super claret has been prattling on on rovers pages since before christmas.
it has even posted on rovers pages whilst dingles have been playing a night match at home!!!! that is how much of an OCDingle it is. Sometimes the sad individual posts as many as 25-30 postings on one rovers story and will often be the first on at 9am and still be posting stuff after midnight.
various rovers posters have had its sign-ins banned but as all you need to is re-register then it appears again instantly. its finest moment is its legendary "jack walker is dead" sign-in. surely even your most ardent dingle must disown it.[/p][/quote]Can't comment on Super Claret but does he post under many names to fool people into answering him?houseclaret

Can't see it happening as our board are tighter than a ducks arse, would any player in the modern game play for 500 quid a week just for the honour of being in the prem.
Stanislas Baird Bryson and Treacy didn't think so. As far as I can make out even with those three departed we have signed a goalkeeper and a striker, so the squad up to press is smaller, relegation is looking nailed on.
Burnleys No 1 Fan

Can't see it happening as our board are tighter than a ducks arse, would any player in the modern game play for 500 quid a week just for the honour of being in the prem.
Stanislas Baird Bryson and Treacy didn't think so. As far as I can make out even with those three departed we have signed a goalkeeper and a striker, so the squad up to press is smaller, relegation is looking nailed on.
Burnleys No 1 FanAnotherPounding4Burnley

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
Can't see it happening as our board are tighter than a ducks arse, would any player in the modern game play for 500 quid a week just for the honour of being in the prem.
Stanislas Baird Bryson and Treacy didn't think so. As far as I can make out even with those three departed we have signed a goalkeeper and a striker, so the squad up to press is smaller, relegation is looking nailed on.
Burnleys No 1 Fan

Our board?

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
Can't see it happening as our board are tighter than a ducks arse, would any player in the modern game play for 500 quid a week just for the honour of being in the prem.
Stanislas Baird Bryson and Treacy didn't think so. As far as I can make out even with those three departed we have signed a goalkeeper and a striker, so the squad up to press is smaller, relegation is looking nailed on.
Burnleys No 1 Fan[/p][/quote]Our board?Rob_H2O

Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?

All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.

how many game did they play last season not many so they wont be missed. try again

[quote][p][bold]mjp 53[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]jack01[/bold] wrote:
So Suzanne understands Burnley want both Deeney and Jutkewitz?
Has the penny dropped yet that Ings is going?
Or do you seriously think Burnley are going to spend cash on two strikers to go with the four already at the club?[/p][/quote]All yours have jumped the sinking ship that is SS Deadwood, Best, Goodwillie, DJ Gamble, Rochina and Etuhu. Not looking good for you lot next season already.[/p][/quote]how many game did they play last season not many so they wont be missed. try againoggy 56

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Quick question for all you Blackburn goons that infest every Burnley article:

Would you like to swap places with Burnley and be starting next season in the Premier League?

If you answer Yes, then at least you are admitting your jealousy.

If you answer NO, then you are lying.

It's OK to admit your jealousy of LANCASHIRE'S NUMBER ONE CLUB, It may help you come to terms with the fact that you now support a mid-table Second Division pile of rubbish and your rivals are one of the best 20 teams in the country.

Ouch, no wonder you are all so bitter and twisted.

mid-table with bigger gates.

[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Quick question for all you Blackburn goons that infest every Burnley article:
Would you like to swap places with Burnley and be starting next season in the Premier League?
If you answer Yes, then at least you are admitting your jealousy.
If you answer NO, then you are lying.
It's OK to admit your jealousy of LANCASHIRE'S NUMBER ONE CLUB, It may help you come to terms with the fact that you now support a mid-table Second Division pile of rubbish and your rivals are one of the best 20 teams in the country.
Ouch, no wonder you are all so bitter and twisted.[/p][/quote]mid-table with bigger gates.oggy 56

2 things. 1. He doesn't wind us up he just makes himself look a tool daily. 2. You're just another ID theft and pretending to support your own obsession. Oh and 3 - you're a retarded dim thickwit no mark bore - but do share your incontinent dribbles and bore everyone daily. A suicide risk that the world would throw razors at. Go into any nondescript bedsit in Blackburn, locate a stain close to the bed. That's where your brain ended up. You just carry the seed of more taxpayers expense. Buy we do not and this I'd important, find you pervy creepy gimps anything more than dorks.

[quote][p][bold]jussy1307[/bold] wrote:
You keep posting turf moor tom I look forward to your posts daily, love how you wind the dingle idiots up.......[/p][/quote]2 things. 1. He doesn't wind us up he just makes himself look a tool daily. 2. You're just another ID theft and pretending to support your own obsession. Oh and 3 - you're a retarded dim thickwit no mark bore - but do share your incontinent dribbles and bore everyone daily. A suicide risk that the world would throw razors at. Go into any nondescript bedsit in Blackburn, locate a stain close to the bed. That's where your brain ended up. You just carry the seed of more taxpayers expense. Buy we do not and this I'd important, find you pervy creepy gimps anything more than dorks.Claretcert

Chuck Norris' Roundhouse wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.

Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.

Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,

Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate

But Steve keane took u down and Sean dyche has taken us up.

Can't believe you come on here with your crap banter. Tell me again who you have signed pre season??? Oh yeah cry baby dunne for an extra year. He is good for 23 games at 60 minutes and a hefty wage packet to boot.

Ffp will kill your shambollically run club. Now that's mega blinding. To quote a bar steward from earlier hahahahahahahaha

[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Chuck Norris' Roundhouse[/bold] wrote:
Five comments and FOUR by Burnley obsessed Blackburn scruffs.
Honestly kids I don't know why you bother, you can just feel the jealousy oozing out of every single typed word as you slam your chubby greasy fingers down on the keyboard.
Poor old Blackburn looking up in wistful envy at their bigger and better rivals,[/p][/quote]Sean Dyche is beginning to sound like steve kean desperate[/p][/quote]But Steve keane took u down and Sean dyche has taken us up.
Can't believe you come on here with your crap banter. Tell me again who you have signed pre season??? Oh yeah cry baby dunne for an extra year. He is good for 23 games at 60 minutes and a hefty wage packet to boot.
Ffp will kill your shambollically run club. Now that's mega blinding. To quote a bar steward from earlier hahahahahahahahastevieclaret

Quick question for all you Blackburn goons that infest every Burnley article:

Would you like to swap places with Burnley and be starting next season in the Premier League?

If you answer Yes, then at least you are admitting your jealousy.

If you answer NO, then you are lying.

It's OK to admit your jealousy of LANCASHIRE'S NUMBER ONE CLUB, It may help you come to terms with the fact that you now support a mid-table Second Division pile of rubbish and your rivals are one of the best 20 teams in the country.

Ouch, no wonder you are all so bitter and twisted.

Would I swap league positions at the beginning of next season? OF COURSE!!

Am I jealous?
Every dog has it's day and that's exactly what the flea bitten mongrel that is burley is having at the moment. After a few kicks it will be cowering in it's stinking kennel as per, very soon.

11:11am Fri 11 Jul 14
Chuck Norris' Roundhouse says...
Quick question for all you Blackburn goons that infest every Burnley article:
Would you like to swap places with Burnley and be starting next season in the Premier League?
If you answer Yes, then at least you are admitting your jealousy.
If you answer NO, then you are lying.
It's OK to admit your jealousy of LANCASHIRE'S NUMBER ONE CLUB, It may help you come to terms with the fact that you now support a mid-table Second Division pile of rubbish and your rivals are one of the best 20 teams in the country.
Ouch, no wonder you are all so bitter and twisted.
Would I swap league positions at the beginning of next season? OF COURSE!!
Am I jealous?
Every dog has it's day and that's exactly what the flea bitten mongrel that is burley is having at the moment. After a few kicks it will be cowering in it's stinking kennel as per, very soon.Cyprusblue

Yet more infantile nonsense from someone who thought football was invented in 1992 by Jack Walker and his investment in his favourite club. Does anyone from the Blackburn Rovers catchment area have anything constructive to say or are they all completely beside themselves with the knowledge that little Burnley are Lancashire's number one club for the next 12 months at the very least.
Life's a **** innit?
LOL

Yet more infantile nonsense from someone who thought football was invented in 1992 by Jack Walker and his investment in his favourite club. Does anyone from the Blackburn Rovers catchment area have anything constructive to say or are they all completely beside themselves with the knowledge that little Burnley are Lancashire's number one club for the next 12 months at the very least.
Life's a **** innit?
LOLDead Sun Rising