I remembered the first time the search occurred to me. I came to myself under a chindolea bush.
~ Binx Bolling (The Moviegoer by Walker Percy)

Sunday, October 19, 2008

No Room in Denver for Kmiec?

Archbishop Charles Chaput says Catholic legal scholar Douglas Kmiec "couldn't be more mistaken" in comparing his own moral reasoning regarding the 2008 presidential election to that of the archbishop.

Archbishop Chaput said this tonight at a dinner sponsored by ENDOW (Educating on the Nature and Dignity of Women). The talk, which he said reflects his own opinion as a private citizen, is titled "Little Murders."

The prelate spoke at length of Douglas Kmiec’s book "Can a Catholic Support Him? Asking the Big Question about Barack Obama," in which the Pepperdine law professor argues why Catholics should cast their vote in November's presidential election for Senator Barack Obama.

Kmiec publicly endorsed the Democratic candidate earlier this year, stating in an article for Slate that Obama is a "natural" for Catholic voters.

Archbishop Chaput noted that his own book, "Render Unto Caesar," was heavily cited by Kmiec in his defense of Obama: "In fact, he suggests that his reasoning and mine are 'not far distant on the moral inquiry necessary in the election of 2008.'"

"Unfortunately, he either misunderstands or misuses my words, and he couldn’t be more mistaken," said the archbishop.

Any comments from those who may have read both Kmiec's book and Chaput's? Sounds like a good discussion to me. Sadly, I've read neither. Chaput's comments can be found at greater length here. They are without a doubt strong, and he sees no wiggling room for the Catholic likes of Kmiec. He concludes:

"I think that people who claim that the abortion struggle is 'lost' as a matter of law, or that supporting an outspoken defender of legal abortion is somehow 'pro-life,' are not just wrong; they’re betraying the witness of every person who continues the work of defending the unborn child.

"And I hope they know how to explain that, because someday they’ll be required to."

Nathan O'Halloran, SJ

2 comments:

Due to bishop Chaput's controversial stements, I just made a quick study of the attention 5 "social sins" receive from Googlers, and the geographic distribution. Have a look at my Word Face-Off blog post.

About Me

Disclaimer

Any opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the authors and do not intend to represent the position of any institution, including but not limited to the Roman Catholic Church and the Society of Jesus.

There was an error in this gadget

Something to Ponder

Better or Better Off by Peter Maurin

The world would be better off,If people tried to become better.And people would become better,If they stopped trying to be better off.For when everybody tries to become better off,Nobody is better off.But when everybody tries to become better,Everybody is better off.Everybody would be rich,If nobody tried to be richer.And nobody would be poor,If everybody tried to be the poorest.And everybody would be what he ought to be,If everybody tried to beWhat he wants the other fellow to be.