First off I had a big mock with lots of pics and descriptions and computer crashed so going with a cheap one now!
We trade our first pick with the Rams sine they are desperate for a LT and have the pics to use to get there. We receive #16, 49 and their first from next year.
at 16 we select Sheldon Richardson
Second rd Margus Hunt de Smu
Third Tank Carridine he will fall with his acl injury and not being able to go to thecombine
4th sanders comming cb georgia
6th best name in the draft Mister Cobble 6 ft 335lb NT
7th Cameron Lawrence ILB
7th Nathan Williams OLB
We use free agency to secure a few lineman and work on the offense but we go strictly defense in the draft.

i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho

Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT.

yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt.

That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.

Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT

I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else.

This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002.

A NT isn't going to make our safeties learn proper angles or how to tackle, A NT won't mask McClain's deficiencies. I don't know why everyone thinks a NT is going to fix our run defense. I mean we run a 4-3 for crying out loud, all a NT is going to do is hurt our pass rush.

today's nfl is centered around the pass, give me the elite penetrating UT and find a run-stuffer later in the draft._________________

Last edited by macklemore on Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:15 pm; edited 1 time in total

i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho

Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT.

yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt.

That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.

Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT

I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else.

This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002.

A NT isn't going to make our safeties learn proper angles or how to tackle, A NT won't mask McClain's deficiencies. I don't know why everyone thinks a NT is going to fix our run defense. I mean we run a 4-3 for crying out loud, all a NT is going to do is hurt our pass rush.

i dont see how richardson can help our defense more than tko. but i like the rest of it maybe some o-line help tho

Imo Richardson = TKO. Maybe a little smarter football wise. Regardless, I really would prefer to not get a penetrating UT.

yea we are kinda stacked at ut and imo 2 ut's dont equal a nt.

That's not just your opinion, its a fact man.

Warren + Kelly =/= NT
Seymour + Kelly =/= NT
Bryant + Kelly =/= NT

I'm probably forgetting some people but we've had poor rush defenses with 2 UTs out there. Its high time we try something else.

This year, we've allowed the least yards on the ground since 2002.

A NT isn't going to make our safeties learn proper angles or how to tackle, A NT won't mask McClain's deficiencies. I don't know why everyone thinks a NT is going to fix our run defense. I mean we run a 4-3 for crying out loud, all a NT is going to do is hurt our pass rush.

today's nfl is centered around the pass, give me the elite penetrating UT and find a run-stuffer later in the draft.

I agree that a true NT is not a huge need and wont solve the issues. We can just look at the last few weeks as proof. Now that position can help but not an instant fix.