“Chink in the armor” is a non-racial idiom, not a single word, denoting:

A vulnerable area, as in Putting things off to the last minute is the chink in Pat’s armor and is bound to get her in trouble one day . This term relies on chink in the sense of “a crack or gap,” a meaning dating from about 1400 and used figuratively since the mid-1600s.

The ESPN editor fired Sunday for using “chink in the armor” in a headline about Knicks phenom Jeremy Lin said the racial slur never crossed his mind – and he was devastated when he realized his mistake.

“This had nothing to do with me being cute or punny,” Anthony Federico told the Daily News….

Battling to contain a furor, the sports network fired Federico and suspended anchor Max Bretos for 30 days because it turned out he had used the same expression on the air last week. ESPN offered profuse mea culpas and promised to be “better in the future.”

Federico, 28, said he understands why he was axed. “ESPN did what they had to do,” he said.

He said he has used the phrase “at least 100 times” in headlines over the years and thought nothing of it when he slapped it on the Lin story….

Bretos, too, said he didn’t think of the slur Wednesday when he asked Knicks legend Walt (Clyde) Frazier about Lin on the air.

“If there is a chink in the armor, where can he improve his game?” Bretos asked….

“My wife is Asian, would never intentionally say anything to disrespect her and that community,” Bretos wrote. “Despite intention, phrase was inappropriate in this context.”

If there were some evidence of a deliberate attempt to use a slur, that would be one thing, but there is none here from what has been revealed.

Comments

The problem is that the writer and editor actually had a vocabulary larger than a 6th grader. Their superiors did not. And the computer-program used to scan for double-plus-ungood words didn’t even go to school.

Madness, and the beginning of the end not just for free speech but for freedom. That’s what political correctness is, really — a tool to inculcate fear and ultimately the end of individuality within the sphere of the state and its ruling orthodoxy. What’s interesting here is how fast and with so little resistance everybody involved submitted to the supreme logic and authority of political correctness. The writer instantaneously jettisoned personal or professional integrity or pride or his civic duty to the First Amendment (if he even had any to begin with). No doubt he was educated at all the best schools, properly trained to recognize his obedience to the codes and the need to pay dearly for his solecism. But shouldn’t he be interred at a re-education camp? Forbidden from working again until he can prove his reformation and swear undying fealty to the PC strictures? Is this that far off? What is the end of political correctness? Or what true ultimate motive does it arise from? Do we teach young people even to imagine this anymore?

When did we come to fear a language offense more than the offense against our right to use language in any way he choose or our obligation to resist this kind of irrational and petty tyranny? The Left must be gloating over their victory.

If some other network or outlet did this ESPN would be leading the piling on so they aren’t being hypocrites about this. That is the only positive thing I’ll say about the world’s leader in sports broadcasting in this matter. If you can imagine the most derogatory comment possible about them otherwise, that’s probably what I think.

Headlines are so often about using terms that convey a double meaning, I find it hard to believe it wasn’t intentional. It seems more likely he wasn’t smart or old enough to know it was pejorative. “Chink” might be as unfamiliar to youngsters as 8-track tape players.

In any case, a simple apology would have made sense. Firing without evidence of intent makes for a hostile work environment, though a communications major should be more aware of non-PC terms. Too bad the “post-racial” Obama environment has only heightened the hypersensitivity.

Seriously, I knew a PhD/MD who was hired by a medical teaching consortium to go through scholarly studies and reports before publishing in order to change any sexist language that described a medical malady.

When standard oil tried to reconstitute whatever was left of Esso, they tried to pick a name that didn’t offend any culture around the world. Research showed that no language had a “xx” (double x) in their words …

It’s certainly a common enough phrase that the announcer should be given a pass on it. Perhaps putting it on a headline feed was too much – you do have to think about impressions, and the sports world was already exploding with “Linsanity” puns. It seems to me harmless if used extemporaneously in an interview, but overusing the phrase in Lin’s case should have raised a flag.

Remember the DC Treasurer who was forced to resign a couple of years ago after criticizing the Mayor’s “niggardly budget” proposal?

“Nobody even wears armor anymore, and the word “chink” is only used — other than in its moronic racial denotation — in that dying metaphor. Here’s my rule: No one should ever use the expression “chink in the armor” again. Fire everyone who lets it go out in a final draft of anything.”

Anyone who is offended by the word “chink” and applies it to a person of Chinese nationality as a slur is racist themselves.

My grandmother had a close friend last named Gay. I heard about Mrs. Gay all the time while I was growing up. I wonder how that family feels about their name, which used to mean happy, being co-opted to mean something else entirely. Then again, one wonders how Sunday’s child feels about this.|Does anyone want to be born on that day in fear of being called gay?

2. There are common-sense limits, though. I had it on reasonably good anecdotal authority that decades ago an advertising agency pitched to An Wang, eminent founder of the once formidable Wang Laboratories, the slogan Wang: The Chink in IBM’s Armor. My source said, “I thought you had to have an IQ above 75 to work in advertising.”

3. A colleague born below the Mason-Dixon line once complained about the phrase going south. I guess every other map should be printed upside-down so that on average the compass does not point in a geographically discriminatory direction.

4. Contra the grievance industry, IMO a reasonably thick skin is a positive attribute in a nation of immigrants—as long as there is no deliberate intention to give offense.

Growing up in Wyoming and spending a some winter nights in log cabin on the prairie, I knew very well what a “chink” is. It is an opening between two logs that will let the wind howl through your cabin and freeze you to death if you don’t fill it in with something.

Those who survived the London Blitz knew that a “chink” in the window curtains would reveal light to the German bombers and make them a target for destruction.

In neither Wyoming nor London did anyone think they were talking about any Chinese person when they used the word “Chink.” ESPN is wallowing in PC these days.

Just to be on the safe side, I’ve thrown out my Elton John Honky Chateau eight track, my signed Whitey Ford baseball, and the box of Cracker Jacks I picked up at the Stop ‘N Rob on my way home this afternoon.

So let me get this straight. Not ONE single person in these comments thinks it remotely possible that 1) the headline writer was actually trying to make a joke, and then 2) admitted this when asked by his superiors at ESPN.

You HONESTLY think the use of the word “chink” in this context was purely coincidental ?

Nonsense.

It was an intentional attempt at humor, and a bad one at that. Firing might be a bit much, but considering the entire ESPN network’s reputation is being put on the line by people authorized to write headlines for them, I can see their justification.

[…] would a group of reasonable men think? TweetBecause me? I think that this is precisely how we surrender language to those who would presume to control us. And it’s something I’ve been warning about […]