But even if we substitute in a more politically correct word for “emasculating,” does Brin’s charge hold up? I’m still not so sure. At this point, Brin seems to be grasping for whatever arguments he can in an effort to convince the world that Google Glass is something it needs. So far, most of his arguments have come up a bit short, at least if you’re wary of effusive claims about new technology.

Brin loves to compare Google Glass to the smartphone, which, while amazing and life-changing just isn’t good enough. (This, it seems, includes even Google’s own Android phones, which Brin seems eager to make obsolete.)

“The cellphone is a nervous habit. I whip this out and look as if I have something important to do. [Google Glass] takes that away,” he said.

Invoking the cellphone’s social stigma in an attempt to justify the existence of Google Glass may seem clever, but it’s really not. The technology is only in its prototype phase, and yet it’s already raising all kinds of concerns about how it will change the way we interact with each other. (You think people constantly whipping out their cell phones is bad? Just wait until you start having conversations with people who are constantly looking at the little displays attached their faces. Something tells me that won’t be any better.)

I should mention here that I’m not anti-Google Glass, per se, and that I’m sure I’ll end up using the device one day. But as cool/innovative/interesting as Google Glass is, I still haven’t found a compelling reason to be excited about it. Glass is still half-empty for me.