Why hundreds of thousands of Muslims rallied against the Jakarta governor

Author

PhD Candidate in Politics at the Asia Institute, University of Melbourne

Disclosure statement

Abdil Mughis Mudhoffir does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Last week, around 200,000 people marched in Jakarta and other Indonesian cities to protest Chinese-Christian Jakarta governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama for allegedly “insulting Islam”.

The rally was organised by the Islamic Defenders Front, a hardline Islamic militia group known in Indonesia as the FPI, and was the biggest social mobilisation in years. It was also the biggest rally the FPI had ever organised. The FPI, notorious for vigilante raids and attacking religious minorities, would normally only mobilise hundreds of protesters.

The rally was triggered by a video of Jakarta governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, known locally as Ahok, criticising his opponents for using Quran verses to warn against voting for him. The video went viral.

I followed the rally in Jakarta to understand the people participating in the rally and their motivations.

Conservative Muslims

From direct interviews with the participants, I found that many of the participants were from the middle class. They were professionals, businesspersons, teachers, and lecturers.

I also found that majority of them are members of majelis taklim (Islamic study groups) or majelis dzikir (Islamic prayer reciting groups) which not only came from Jakarta and its surrounding areas but also from outer Java. Many of them are not associated with the FPI or other Islamic vigilante groups. Most of them identify themselves as conservative Muslims and are against violent protests.

Their political orientations are diverse. They include supporters of the Islamic political parties, supporters of nationalist parties. Some were even supporters of the Democratic Indonesia of Struggle Party (PDI-P), the party endorsing Ahok in next year’s Jakarta gubernatorial race. Others had no political preference.

But looking at the character of the people who took part in the rally, their main interest is hardly in Jakarta’s local election or even in the Ahok administration’s policies.

I did meet participants who were victims of forced evictions under Ahok. But they claimed they took part in the rally as representatives of their majelis taklim. They said they were demanding Ahok to be jailed for blasphemy, not for his eviction policies.

They are motivated by the desire to defend Islam from alleged blasphemy. This, however, does not necessarily mean that religious intolerance is also growing. Existing explanations have missed a broader political context and historical analysis that makes multi-group mobilisation under the banner of Islam possible.

I argue that such mobilisation was possible as an outcome of the marginalisation of the Islamist’s interests within formal politics during Jokowi administration.

The rally was a vehicle for Islamic groups to deliver their dissents to the state (Jokowi). Accusing Ahok of blasphemy was a trigger that mobilise such dissent.

A lot of protesters are members of conservative Islamic groups who were accommodated during the administration of previous president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (known as SBY) but now they feel that they have been excluded. Their interests are represented in the parliament by the Prosperous Justice Party (known locally as PKS), an opposition party whose current position is also weak.

In Indonesia, it has been common for the ruling power to win over conservative Muslim groups for their support. Since the 1990s, former president Suharto started to engage with conservative Muslims as a result of changing political alliance when the military support for him started to wane. Suharto, an adherent of Javanese mysticism, then presented himself and his family as true Muslims.

The same political approach was also employed by SBY during his administration.

Two of the groups that took part in the rally, Majelis Rosulullah (MR) and Majelis Dzikir Nurussalam (MDN) are Islamic reciting groups with thousands of members in Jakarta. These groups are close to former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.

SBY is one of the founders of MDN. During his presidency, SBY routinely visited events held by these organisations usually held in Monas (National Monument) park close to the presidential palace in Jakarta.

In contrast, from the beginning of his presidency, Jokowi has not made any significant approach to this group, or sought their support. Jokowi has preferred to make a loose alliance with so-called moderate Islamic groups represented by two largest Muslim organisations, Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah. Unlike more conservative Islamist groups, these moderate Muslims groups generally reject formal adoption of sharia law.

In the parliament, PKS was also excluded from Jokowi’s political alliance. In general, conservative Muslims have no place during Jokowi administration.

The same political approach was also applied by Jokowi when he was a governor of Jakarta. It has continued under Ahok. The fact that Ahok is from a Chinese-Christian cultural background has raised negative sentiment from Islamic groups.

From the start of Ahok’s administration, MDN and the FPI have protested against Ahok as an acting governor due to his religious background. MDN was also one of the organisations who insisted the MUI (Indonesian Ulama Council, a group of clerics) to issue a fatwa (edict) regarding Ahok’s comments in September.

Meanwhile, MR was disappointed by Ahok’s policy banning dzikir akbar or large gathering of prayer reciting in Monas park. Before Ahok, MR could always use the park for such event. When the case was brought to the president, Jokowi preferred to support Ahok’s policy than MR’s complaints.

One of MR’s followers said to me that he joined the anti-Ahok rally because he was disappointed by what he saw as Ahok’s discrimination against MR. He said Ahok

allowed an event to celebrate the new year held in Monas park while he prohibited the event for MR. Ahok is trying to discriminate against Muslims.

FPI’s win

In the context of Jakarta election, there is no doubt that Ahok’s opponents gain political advantages from the rally.

But the biggest winner from the rally is the organiser, the FPI. Their success in galvanising 200,000 people to rally will encourage a perception that the FPI is the organisation able to represent and mobilise conservative Muslims. This increases FPI’s leverage as an Islamic vigilante organisation. Once a fringe group, it may remain an important actor in Indonesian politics.

If conservative groups continue to feel marginalised and the FPI use these sentiments to band together against the government, another large demonstration could happen.

You might also like

Racism, political agenda of Jakarta governor opponents in the upcoming gubernatorial race, and discontent from the urban poor over Purnama’s policy on forced evictions all factor in the protest turnout in addition to religious motives.
Reuters/Beawiharta