Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive, got a snicker from the audience during his company’s latest iPad unveiling by dredging up old predictions that the tablet would flop. Some people didn’t see a need for the device when it was first introduced three years ago, he said, before flashing an anonymous quote on screen—presumably from an analyst or blogger—that forecast its demise.

How sweet it must have felt. Apple’s iPad is, of course, one of the technology industry’s biggest hits with more than 170 million sold. But many pundits didn’t see it coming, as Cook took great pleasure highlighting yesterday for the hundreds on hand in a San Francisco theater and the legions watching online. (Plenty of outlets have been dead wrong about Apple in the past.) Cook used the occasion to introduce updated iPads including the iPad Air, a thinner full-sized tablet.

TIME tracked down two of the three people whose misguided predictions Cook mentioned in his presentation. The remaining one could not be traced back to a specific source, and Apple did not respond to an email seeking details. Both people who could be found readily acknowledged mistakes about their prognostications, but their views differed about Apple digging them up now and, well, rubbing it in.

Cook did not mention their names, so any potential embarrassment was limited. Moreover, in doubting Apple’s eventual success with the iPad, they had plenty of company.

Just hours after getting his first iPad three years ago, Paul Thurrott, editor of the technology blog Supersite for Windows, quickly published his first impression. “Anyone who believes this thing is a game changer is a tool,” he wrote. This and other pointed opinions about the iPad’s future would haunt him later.

Occasionally, journalists and readers of Thurrott’s blog bring up the line as an example of punditry gone wrong. Then yesterday, Cook joined the fray to rally the faithful. His implicit message: Trust in Apple’s vision. Although Cook didn’t mention it, Apple’s vision is facing renewed doubts as it gives up market share in tablets to rival devices using Google’s Android operating system. “I do think it was a little cheap,” Thurrott said about Cook quoting his old review. Thurrott had been watching Apple’s webcast of the event when, without warning, he saw Cook use the quote as a punch line.

Thurrott said that his error is frozen in time, and that many people use it against him without mentioning that his views have since changed. Within a few months of panning the iPad, he started publishing articles that were more favorable as he better understood the device and as Apple added new features. Today, he says he’s a big Apple fan. “I think their devices are fantastic. I think the iPad Mini is fantastic, and the iPads they introduced today are fantastic,” he said. “That’s what bugs me about the quote.”

Admittedly, Thurrott said that making predictions isn’t one of his strengths. “I actually feel that I’m pretty horrible about prognostication stuff,” he said.

“It’s not going to revolutionize anything. It’s not going to replace netbooks.”

Bruce Berls, a consultant who helps small businesses with technology, wrote those words about the iPad three years ago in his blog, just days after Apple first introduced the device. To him, it seemed too expensive and lacking in features like a built-in camera.

Berls said he soon changed his mind, however, after seeing how people used the iPad and after Apple improved the device. How did he get things so wrong in first place? “At the time, I didn’t quite know where the iPad fit,” Berls said. “There was no clear niche that it filled because it was a niche that didn’t exist before. Nobody was demanding one because no one had it yet.”

It was a mistake that many people made about the iPad, he pointed out, including Bill Gates, Microsoft’s founder, who said: “It’s a nice reader, but there’s nothing on the iPad I look at and say, ‘Oh, I wish Microsoft had done it.’”

Until contacted by a reporter, Berls was unaware that his blog, which normally has a readership of around 1,000 people, played a supporting role in Cook’s presentation. Surprisingly, rather than being embarrassed by the attention, he said he was excited. “I’m happy to be called out by Tim Cook,” Berls said. “I’m thrilled to be wrong in way that’s interesting.”

Cook used Berls’ comment to underscore how the iPad had succeeded in upsetting the status quo in the computer industry. When Apple first introduced the iPad, netbooks, a sort of mini-laptop, were all the rage. “Others didn’t think it could compete with the netbook,” Cook said before going on to ask “who remembers netbooks?”

Apple did selectively quote from Berls’ writing, however, and lost some nuance in the process. Berls didn’t say the iPad was doomed. Rather he said that while it wouldn’t replace netbooks, “it will find large and devoted audiences, particularly after the price drops and some features get added.”

What the experience has taught Berls is to be more cautious about quickly dismissing new technologies of today like Google Glass and smartwatches. “It has made me a lot more gun-shy about saying something is unimportant when it’s first released.”

I guess that is why not anyone can be an icon like Steve Jobs, you can call it whatever you want but the man was a genius at creating devices that were ahead of its time. He was a genius at awing people and show them what they would need before they even knew it.

I used to be an Apple evangelist, until I spent $629 on the original iPad, which Apple broke with iOS 5.0 ... Planned obsolescence is not the way to my heart! Now I stick with Nexus, much cheaper risk than buying a $600 paperweight.

Yeah now the original iPad has no OS upgrade and is now orphaned now after only three years. I guess I will put it next to my Newton and now no more Apple products for me forever. Should have known this when I bought my clone PowerPC when Apple authrorized it to be made.

<!--Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link,...................................Buzz55.ℂℴm-->

Wow some electronic gadget for surfing the internet and watching video is a "game changer". Sure they have made a load of money from the tools that buy this crApple gadgets but IMO that's not revolutionary.

I was a wireless analyst back in the days when Apple introduced their smartphone. I remember maybe 75% of analysts, some of them pretty prominent, saying that it would fail. No keyboard, and who would ever want a touch screen on a phone? I also remember reading all these comments, and seeing if they really made sense. As it turned out, my thoughts at the time were that many of the comments were more biased about Apple as a company, than they were about the iPhone as a new type of device. Basically, how could this company that "knows nothing about the phone market" actually put out a good one? I have to wonder, were they evaluating the iPhone, or were they just judging Apple at the time? Its a shame how many people really stick with biases like that, and this certainly goes well beyond electronic products.

<!-- I simply
got paid $6784 operating off my laptop computer this month. And if you're
thinking that it is cool, and you also want to earn money then you are on the
right way just go to this site and click on the Home button for helpful and
amazing details..........>Blue48.ℂℴm -->

@anorr True, neither pro nor anti Apple bias does much for our understanding. The lengths and vindictiveness often exhibited in these arguments on blogs and elsewhere are not particularly useful, though they may make the people loudly espousing them feel better, at least briefly. It is quite another matter to read some insightful piece written by someone who has some special expertise or experience, or views the matter from a fresh and different perspective.