This
is a followup to my 2013 report: The Rise of Revolutionary Islam
in Pakistan – A Report on Behavior Control, in which I had
examined the motivation for Shia killings in Pakistan. Which is, to
provide the raison d'être for the creation of “revolutionary
Islam” in Pakistan as an Iranian export under the leadership of
“valih-e-faqih”. I had written a letter to the head of a
new Shia theological seminary in Lahore, Pakistan who exhorts his
large audience with his demagoguery to come under the protection of
the “valih-e-faqih”, Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, the
Supreme Leader of Iran. Putting this new Hegelian Dialectic in
context of yesteryear when the theological founder of Pakistan, “Sir”
Allama Iqbal, as the British empire's honored knight, (that is what
“Sir” stands for), had similarly crafted the raison
d'être for the partition of the Indian subcontinent in the name
of religion, creates a frightening scenario for extracting more blood
tribute from Pakistanis. The adage: “a man is known by the
company he keeps” makes this enormously learned leader of the
Shia theological seminary repeatedly paying tribute to Allama Iqbal,
appear to be cast from the same mold. After due diligence to his long
tireless speeches which are in effect predictably doing what the
manufactured Shia killings are intended to do, in just the same way
as what “Sir” Allama Iqbal did with the manufactured
Hindu-Muslim violence in the Indian subcontinent casting it as the
raison d'être for the partition of India, the entire
game-theory laced manufactured “revolutionary times” is
just too obvious. And frightening. No Pakistani youth should be
harvested as the useful idiot of empire to sustain its “arc of
crisis” from the madrassahs of Pakistan. They go there to learn
their religion, often victims of economic conscription, and enticed
by free education as well as prospects of a lifetime of easy
employment as local “imams”, but graduate as soldiers of
God and fertilizers for cemeteries. “Revolutionary Islam”
makes the best fertilizers with the blood of its nation's youth. It
is amply evidenced in the Western imposed Iran-Iraq war which armed
both sides to aid and abet Muslim on Muslim violence. Sadaam was
armed openly. Revolutionary Iran covertly, and the latter became the
notorious Iran-Contra scandal in the United States. The absolutist
rule of the recalcitrant “valih-e-faqih” believing in
“divine destiny” was essential for waging that
internecine war for eight long years. With that as the backdrop, the
response I received for challenging the narrative of this new up and
coming surrogate of the “valih-e-faqih” in Pakistan was:
“shut up”, barked by some minion. Due to the urgency of
the matter for not just Pakistan, but the world now witnessing
another Muslim fratricide in Yemen with the West once again goading
Muslims to kill Muslims, I make a second attempt to engage that
leadership with this followup --- perhaps they are only unwitting
thespians in this staged Act, like the soldiers of God they
indoctrinate.

A
call to cut the Gordian knot

When
courageous Muslims don't rise to challenge and redress their own
issues boldly and truthfully, their enemies and hectoring hegemons
are left the door wide open to do so; to create the vocabulary, to
create the narrative, and to control the public discourse in their
own Newspeak. The enemies rope in all the house niggers
and mercenaries from among the Muslims themselves to become the
chauvinistic pied pipers who lead with the enemy's own narrative. The
battle is lost by any people every single time because of this. The
standoffishness and silence of the uninformed public to the errors
and shenanigans of their own kind permits a superior more agile foe
to fill the space with more Muslim on Muslim violence. The only
effective point of interdiction to this malady is before the
proverbial Gordian knot is firmly tied upon the matter --- for
afterward, the ensuing chaos falls on the natural curve of an
orchestrated fait accompli by the processes of game theory and
dynamics of human behavior.

As
of this writing, more than two years later almost a year and
half later, no retraction for the “shut up”
reply, or an apology, or regret, or distancing from the pathetic
reply given by the minion as being gratuitous, or other meaningful
response pertinent to the inquiry
letter was received. What caliber of pulpit and what
level of scholarship, never mind decency of interlocution, that this
superlative demagogue with an oratory skill that is hard to match,
cannot even respond to a straightforward intellectual challenge, mind
you not a political challenge, but an academic inquiry based on his
own statements, without barking “shut up” through his
followers! Allama Syed Jawad Naqvi, the head of the new Shia
theological seminary named Jamea Orwathul Wuthqa in Lahore,
Pakistan, evidently does not have the courage to fight his own
battles when faced with intellectual challengers. He puts up his
useful idiots to do the barking. One can only surmise that he has
become too big for his pious turban that he can no longer be bothered
with even an intellectual challenge that does not conform to his own
theology. This fellow so boldly claims the mantle of Imam Ali who
constantly endeared his people to ask him questions?

God
help Pakistan if indoctrinated soldiers of God ever escape out of
their madrassahs and come to political power. It does not matter from
which theological seminary – for one can hardly tell them apart
based on their self-righteousness. Just self-righteous about
different theologies, that's all. All they can ever demand from
governance is absolute obedience, and all they can ever command of
the people who question them is a “shut up”. And worse!
Sentencing to death as was done in post revolutionary Iran all their
dissenters isn't unimaginable in a country like Pakistan where the
gallows are, not just historically, but even in the present as I
write this, an instrument of politics. Just witness how all the
terrorist killers of Sunni Muslims are being hanged, while the
killers of Shia Muslims being given reprieves to soldier on with
their divine mission of more indiscriminate Shia killings in
Pakistan. Without intolerable oppression upon the Shias, the raison
d'être for “revolutionary Islam” does not exist.
Which is why this phenomenon is best represented by the rise of new
SAVAK in Pakistan, as the Shah's American trained SAVAK was
instrumental in creating the raison d'être for Iran's Islamic
Revolution.

What
an enviable replacement for the superman tyrants who rule the
public mind with the same iron-fist of their own theology. Another
superman who deems himself beyond reproach, but is made holy
because he takes the name of God, the Prophet of Islam, the Imams of
the Ahlul-Bayt, the valih-i faqih! The similarity ought not to exist
with any of the God's many theologies proclaimed by man. We have
plenty of the Übermensch's
variety to already contend with. Yet we find that these demagogues
fare little better in their absolutism.

One
might perhaps be forgiven for thinking that based on the record of
their identical behavior, the institutionalization of God is the
handiwork of the same superman. His trick from time
immemorial has remained to speak for the oppressed and to oppose
tyranny. That is guaranteed to draw the future soldiers of God
quicker than moth to flame. It is an exact science. Should one warn
the moth? Can that ever work? Or should one douse the flame that is
about to burn the house down?

If
only these heavenly pontiffs so boldly proclaiming a Divine mandate,
claiming the moral mantle of the Prophets, claiming to stand up to
tyrannical systems, claiming to offer people justice, would begin
with the Golden Rule as their first Divine predicate of public
stewardship.

How
hard can that be?

Only
as hard as self-interest!

Allama
Jawad Naqvi is invited once again to intelligently respond to the
original inquiry letter and the intellectual challenges cited
therein:

(1)
his repeated public celebration of “Sir”
Allama Iqbal and avoiding all facts such as he
willingly accepted knighthood and other imperial benefits from the
tyrannical British empire while it ruled and plundered the Indian
subcontinent ;

(2)
the Doctrine
of Taqlid pushed by the Shia theocratic pulpit to
extract voluntary servitude from its followers, the examination of
which is in the document referenced in the letter ; and

(3)
the face
of “revolutionary Islam” being presented
to the world that is maligning all Muslims worldwide as belonging to
a polity of “barbarians”, and thus justifying the
propaganda warfare in the West by Islamophobes that: “It's
Not a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized
World and Barbarians”, as
they motivate their own gullible public to fight these new
barbarians in preemptive self-defence before the throw-back to the
stone age bring their knives and swords to the West ;

without
sending out some new useful idiots to bark at the petitioner.

Otherwise,
this rebel Shia scholar of “revolutionary Islam” is
really no better than the house
nigger
Sunni-sufi leader of “moderate Islam”, the champion of
“Democracy Revolution”, the glorified stooge of the West,
more white than the white man, Dr. Tahir-ul Qadri, who behaved
analogously to the public challenge that was thrown to him in 2010 by
this scribe for publishing the much celebrated 600
page Fatwa on Terrorism
in which the pontiff of “moderate Islam” wrote a blank
check to the majestic state terrorism of the emperor, the greatest
sponsor of state terror on earth, while condemning the terrorism of
the pirates, and neglecting to mention that the pirates are just
another army division of the emperor carrying Islam's banner aloft to
malign Islam as if it is such a big state secret! The Shia
rebel pontiff is more honest and accurate when it comes to parsing
current affairs as one can glean from his speeches. But the attitude
towards anyone questioning his position is disturbingly similar: to
marginalize and dismiss. Tahir-ul Qadri's spokesman was kind enough
to label this scribe “nut-job” for the bold challenge to
their leader and advised their staff to not respond. Hide behind
minions for how long? These are not idle questions but of immediate
life and death significance for the people of Pakistan.

The
challenge for open interlocution to explain why the Sunni-sufi
pontiff remained so brazenly silent on the crimes of the emperor when
empire's own citizens boldly file cases in the World Court against
their own president for crimes against humanity, is still open to Dr.
Qadri.

The
challenge to explain his own shameful silence on the knighthood
accepted by “Sir” Allama Iqbal from a tyrannical empire
while extolling his virtues from the pulpit of Imam Ali, a disgrace
and a travesty to the sanctity of the very pulpit and the Imams in
whose name all this divine preaching is being done, is still open to
Allama Jawad Naqvi. Imagine Imam Ali and the family of the Prophet of
Islam taking a knighthood from Muawiya!

In
these times of universal deceit, only fools follow. And only the
superman lead. A genuine moral agent of change is neither. He
is neither a useful idiot for the superman, nor the superman.

The
fact that “revolutionary Islam” is creating the perfect
trifecta of “militant Islam” vs. “moderate Islam”
vs “revolutionary Islam”, the perfect Hegelian
Dialectic serving only the imperial interest of having
a continuous supply of believable enemies to fight against, a
necessity for empire for its “imperial mobilization”
toward world government, alongside the neutralization of public
resistance with invitation to the more acceptable and peace-loving
“moderate Islam”, is a cause for concern for all
perceptive people wishing to not live with anyone's boot stamped on
their face. The boot is not made any softer if it is worn by a black
turban proclaiming some divine mandate to keep it on the public's
face. This is but a truism applicable to all absolutist rule. But it
is even more true for the obedience to Valih-e-faqih demagoguery that
has filled the cemeteries of Iran with her young blood in the name of
divine mandate for the “sacred war”. Its export to
Pakistan will do the same.

Just
listen to the slogan-mongering in the speeches of Jawad Naqvi and
“Gott mit uns” (God with us) begins to pale in
comparison. It has to be witnessed in the lecture videos so
generously made available at the website islamimarkaz.com
to appreciate the level of indoctrination and psychological
persuasion that is going on to create the future robot army of God.
It is no different in any of the other thousand seminaries dotting
Pakistan, each indoctrinating their flock with their respective
theology.

Pertinent
to the demographics of Pakistan, she is a multi-ethnic, multi-sect,
multi-lingual country that is hardly even a nation of one people from
its very founding in the harvest of indigenous blood. No single
ethnicity imposing its theocracy on the rest of the nation can give
fairness to everyone. It will only lead to blood-shed, and more
blood-shed, not organically, but synthetically. That is what the
empire du jour wants: Muslim killing Muslim, people killing their own
kind, and they spare no opportunity of harvest. They have vassals and
surrogates in the establishment ready to cut that harvest, often not
even needing any direct orders to do so. The very nature of the
harvest through long years of cultivation has made it semi-autonomous
and viral. By themselves they cannot create full all-out blood-shed.
They need an enemy that is also willing to die in battle in order to
do so.

And
there is nothing better or cheaper than the “revolutionary
Islam” soldiers, also only too eager to spill their own blood
to take-down the “militant Islam” soldiers under orders
from their valih-e-faqih and his lieutenants who conveniently stay
behind, along with their own children and grandchildren, while the
indoctrinated useful idiots on both sides do all the killing and
dying.

Iran
once again demonstrates the reality of the matter rather empirically.
It is not a matter of opinion but of facts and numbers. Numbers are a
pretty objective metric of accounting and accountants.

How
many children and grandchildren of the revolutionary Ayatollahs in
Qom died on the battlefront? How many of his own children and
grandchildren did Ayatollah (imam) Khomeini commit to the beheshti-e
zahra cemeteries from the battlefront between 1982 and 1988 when the
valih-e-faqih-e-muslimeen insisted on continuing the war with Iraq
even after all of Iranian soil had been liberated from their original
aggression? The vast majority of deaths of Iranian youth was between
1982 and 1988 --- how many of these belonged to the Ayatollahs of Qom
and Mashad in the senseless war of self-righteousness that saw
millions of Shia-Sunni Muslims trivially kill each other on both
sides of the fence?

If
death in battle is so cheaply sold for the harvest of lovely maidens
and high station of manhood in heaven, why don't the Ayatollahs send
their own children and grandchildren to the front? There are hundreds
of thousands of Ayatollahs in Qom. A roster showing how many children
each one has/had and how many were killed in the minefields on the
frontline so courageously walked by the youth of Iran who never got a
chance to even grow up to full adulthood, would be useful data for
all sides to come to a reasonable understanding of whose blood is
being called for in the name of Imam Mahdi!

Only
the ostriches will bury their head here, and of course those living
comfortably outside of Pakistan and only too willing to fight their
“jihad” with other people's blood in the name of their
theology.

You
don't need Imam Ali's sword to battle the tyrants of the world today.
The situation calls for King Solomon's sword to battle them. Unless
the two are one and the same sword with two sides. You need the
intellect side of “zulfiqar” to even begin to make a dent
in this all out war being waged by way of deception upon all of
humanity without sacrificing the humanity you are trying to defend.

The
first weapon of aggression of empire is superior intellect. Only
intellect can counter it. A doctrinaire eco-system which does not
nurture the intellect, which does not make one skilled in the
intellectual resources that the enemy draws upon to arm its own
battalions, can hardly field the skilled warriors who can wield the
appropriate sword required for an effective battle. That does not
mean giving up one's personal beliefs. It also does not mean having
everyone else believe the same thing in order to wage a common
resistance against a common predator.

The
predators don't care what religion you are, only that you make a
tasty meal, or posses what they desire control over. They wish to
control all life, all resources, all assets, not just Muslims. The
atheist superman harvests religion far more productively to
design its life's goals than those whose religion he uses. The man of
cloth is putty in their hands. Iran today serves a most valuable role
as the fictitious “indomitable” enemy of the West. A
third-world country that can't even feed its own peoples, is a threat
to them in the actual reality of their calculus of one-world
government?

And
now that perfect enemy of the West is to be imported into Pakistan?
The headstone count in our cemeteries will come to far outstrip the
beheshti-zahras of Iran. If you have to lay down your life for a
divine cause, at least be sure that you aren't simultaneously a
disposable pawn being played on the grand chessboard taking the
entire nation and others down with you.

The
first recognition of the sword of intellect must be of this fact –
that “revolutionary Islam” is a most cunning part of the
same diabolical Hegelian Dialectic that has been used in waging all
the abhorrent wars of the twentieth century. The creation of a
“defeatable” enemy in which both sides suffer, one is
resolutely destroyed, and a third unseen power behind the scenes gets
to reap the harvest of that blood fest.

We
have already witnessed Christians killing Christians, more than 50
million of them, in the two World Wars of the twentieth century. Some
have put that number to 100 million. The twenty-first has evidently
been earmarked for spilling Muslim blood to continue on with the same
agenda, of creating world government by destroying all existing
order. The twenty-first century harvest of Muslim blood began a bit
early, in Afghanistan in 1979, continued in Iran-Iraq, and is on
going in the entire Middle East, South Asia, and engulfs the entire
“arc of crisis” in the “global zone of percolating
violence”. All presaged in public writings at its very
inception in 1979.

Muslims
today are in the most precarious position. We hardly need more
indoctrinated pawns wielding their antediluvian swords in absolute
self-righteousness in further fulfillment of the plans of world
order. This cannot mean Muslims, like other peoples and nations, do
nothing. It only means to stop being useful idiots in the service of
empire. That takes an intellect and an acumen which seems to be in as
abundant a quantity as it is varied and multi-disciplinary among the
stewards of empire, and a very precious commodity indeed among the
Muslims. When we do have the neuronal capabilities and the requisite
skills, we tragically turn either into house
niggers or
superman.

Enough
Muslim on Muslim violence!

Irrespective
of nationality and religious/sectarian affiliation, all those who
share in that aim of existential self-defence must come together
against the common enemy of mankind that is aspiring to rule the
world upon the foundations of Muslim blood --- or the wily predators
will eat each one of us separately, or have us eat each other.

The
first baby-step in that direction is to say “hello” to
that other fellow over there who thinks different and hear him out
without saying “shut up”. Thanks for not saying “shut
the fck up” - but then the ideology is not yet in power.

The
author, an ordinary justice activist, formerly an ordinary engineer
in Silicon Valley, California (see engineering patents at
http://tinyurl.com/zahir-patents
), founded Project Humanbeingsfirst.org in the aftermath of 9/11. He
was, mercifully, most imperfectly educated in the United States of
America despite attending its elite schools on both coasts. This
might perhaps explain how he could escape the fate of
“likkha-parrha-jahils” (educated morons) mass produced in
its technetronic
society with all his neurons still intact and still firing on all
cylinders. He is inspired by plain ordinary people rising to
extraordinary challenges of their time more than by privileged and
gifted people achieving extraordinary things. He chose his byline to
reflect that motivation: The Plebeian Antidote to Hectoring
Hegemons. Bio at
http://zahirebrahim.org.
Email: humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com.
Verbatim reproduction license for all his work at
http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Copyright.

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.