I have been following this case since April 2006, when Savage, a devout Quaker was accused of homophobic “gay” sexual harassment by a unanimous MOSU faculty committee vote, led by English faculty members who held themselves out as experts in human sexuality. Clearly, Alfred Kinsey would be a major cause for such irrational faculty fury.

It was Kupelian’s detailed expose of Alfred Kinsey’s frauds and child sexual abuse research protocol in Chapter 6 “Obsessed With Sex: How Fraudulent Science Unleashed a Catastrophic ‘Revolution,'” that triggered this seething faculty wrath.

The faculty announced that Kupelian’s chapter on Alfred Kinsey was false. Moreover, they accused his Kinsey whistleblower, Dr. Judith Reisman, of being a “self-promoting pontificator,” “fringe” “so-called scholar” “deemed incompetent by professional scholars.”

One Amazon reader writes of “The Marketing of Evil” that “The chapter on Kinsey and the selling of sex in America is a true eye opener and worth the price of the book by itself.” Another says, “Again, his nauseating descriptions of Alfred Kinsey’s behavior, though incredible, only scratch the surface of the man’s depravity.”

More on the MOSU “mentor” program for children age 14, or for those “20 and under” will be provided in later articles on this case. The MOSU recruitment of immature youths into their sexually freighted atmosphere renders the “party” invitations, and the “mentoring” of youngsters by “queer” MOSU specialists, more than suspect.

Several normal high schools have canceled their prom nights due to the off-site drinking and sexual promiscuity too common at these events. MOSU’s invitation to junior or senior high schoolers to “party” with adult gays, etc., would suggest to some cynics, brazen child sexual recruitment.

Obviously, MOSU profs would defame the whistleblower of Kinsey’s deliberate frauds and depraved child sex crimes, “the so-called expert you cite in favor of this book.” Posing as a scholar, Jones states that Kupelian’s definition of Kinsey as a “sexual psychopath” departs from the accuracy typically expected of scholarship.”
However, the police blotter “sex offender” registration code defines a “sexual psychopath” as “a person, not insane, who by a course of repeated misconduct in sexual matters has evidenced such lack of power to control his or her sexual impulses as to be dangerous to other persons because he or she is likely to attack or otherwise inflict injury, loss, pain or other evil on the objects of his or her desire.”

Although the religion defense is certainly appropriate in the Savage case, I keep waiting for a bold legal group to sue our universities and schools for soliciting and accepting state and federal funds to teach and perpetrate Kinsey’s human sexuality frauds.