Andrew Kohlsmith (mailing lists account) wrote:
> Format shifting is also fair use. Being able to watch it on a DVD player of my
> own making is also fair use.
Of course, if we're going to be analyzing a legal document (like a
pending bill) we should be using the right terminology.
"Fair Use" is a U.S. exemption to copyright which does not apply in
Canada. Canada has "Fair Dealing", which covers only five explicit
exceptions:
Review
Criticism
Research
Private Study
News Reporting
There is no Fair Dealing for format shifting, time shifting, satire,
parody or watching DVDs on a player of your own creation (you must pay a
license fee on the order of tens of thousands of dollars to the DVD Copy
Control Association, otherwise you're infringing by making a copy of the
deCSS software or firmware).
Even if your use of copyrighted material falls under one of the Fair
Dealing provisions you may still be infringing depending on the amount
of material you copy, the length of time you intend to use it, whether a
non-infringing alternative was available. It is also possible that the
Review and News Reporting provisions only apply to paid journalists.
Bloggers may be infringers if they quote an excerpt of a copyrighted
work on their book/film/music review blog...
Format Shifting was declared as a Fair Use in the U.S. after the Sony
vs. Universal trial, the "Betamax Case". Of course, you may have meant
that it is *unfair* _not_ be allowed to format shift or watch a DVD on a
player of your own making, and I would agree. But it's not Fair Use in
Canada...
--Bob.
Bob Jonkman<bjonkman at sobac.com> http://sobac.com/sobac/
SOBAC Microcomputer Services Voice: +1-519-669-0388
6 James Street, Elmira ON Canada N3B 1L5 Cel: +1-519-635-9413
Software --- Office& Business Automation --- Consulting