I'm thinking about not looking at grades. I realize this would make it difficult to include rank or GPA on a resume. Let's forget about this problem.

Really, I'm thinking the best strategy for me is to keep my head down, study hard and outline, do practice exams, write the exams to the best of my ability, and then just let them go without even looking at grades.

ReasonableNprudent wrote:I'm thinking about not looking at grades. I realize this would make it difficult to include rank or GPA on a resume. Let's forget about this problem.

Really, I'm thinking the best strategy for me is to keep my head down, study hard and outline, do practice exams, write the exams to the best of my ability, and then just let them go without even looking at grades.

Has anyone done this?

We had a short challenge here after the first semester as to who could hold out the longest. I love the idea, the ultimate test of will. That said, I don't see the actual benefit other than a challenge, and as you pointed out eventually you're gonna need to disclose them. Are you a 1L?

Not sure entirely what the context is here - not looking at your grades post 1L from Fall or Spring semester?

If it's any time 2L or after - fine, you do you. Grades don't matter quite so much except around the margins (if you're gunning for latin honors or trying to avoid flunking).

For 1L though, I think it's a good idea to look at your grades reasonably soon after you get them. First, it's good to learn as quickly as possible how your efforts did or did not pay off while the classes before are still as fresh in your mind as possible. This is really more related to doing better later on if you feel the need to, which is in some conflict to my point about 2L/3L grades above.

More importantly, though, is looking at grades for OCI/hiring purposes. You'll want to figure out what firms at which you have a reasonable shot - and this means working with the grades you have. If they're not great, that sucks, but the goal of law school isn't feeling good about yourself; it's about hustling to get that jerb.

Granted, I went on the other end of the spectrum and plotted out potential grade spreads and how that would affect my chances at certain firms given our school's hiring history. This is neurotic and I don't recommend it.

I'm just not really a fan of the impending circle jerk/self-flogging-fest that comes with grades being released. People are usually lined up at the graphics/printing dept on the day they come out, anxiously and eagerly waiting. For most, the anxiety isn't pacified by receiving the grade.

The necessity of grades for OCI and the value of including good grades on resumes kind of makes it impossible to pay no attention to them.

The thought of mostly disregarding grades stems from my feeling that grades don't adequately quantify or represent the gain that has been made through the course work. Basically, the point of course work is to learn how to be a lawyer. Basing the whole endeavor on a final letter grade seems inadequate, especially when the summation of the whole course is based on only one (or maybe 2) exams. Simply learning and exhaustively studying simply to be tested feels cheap. However, I don't know that there is any other way to both measure proficiency and give incentive for people to actually learn.

The fact is, though, that law school is still "school" and measurement of aptitude/proficiency/gain is necessary. Also, much of legal practice is adversarial and summated in a single win or lose outcome.

I think I was just having a late-night moment where I envisioned an ideal eutopia where law students push forward to develop their proficiency and acumen without pesky evaluation. Sort of like how Buddhist monks study/practice in a monastery towards achieving zen. But that's not how it works. Lol. Paying no attention to grades is probably a horrible strategy for success.

ReasonableNprudent wrote:Basically, the point of course work is to learn how to be a lawyer.

That's what they want you to believe but it hasn't been true for decades, if it ever was. Law school is about getting a credential. The vast majority of the learning comes on the job. Study to get good grades so you can get that job.

I'm pretty sure that the Sealocust, a former poster here, never looked at his grades after going through OCI. If you're going the biglaw route I can see getting away with that. As everyone else has said, I think you do at least have to look at 1L grades so you can plan for OCI. Personally, I couldn't have not looked because I'm too obsessive, but I also didn't go the biglaw route, so needed to look at them for clerkship and post-clerkship hiring.

ReasonableNprudent wrote:I'm just not really a fan of the impending circle jerk/self-flogging-fest that comes with grades being released. People are usually lined up at the graphics/printing dept on the day they come out, anxiously and eagerly waiting. For most, the anxiety isn't pacified by receiving the grade.

The necessity of grades for OCI and the value of including good grades on resumes kind of makes it impossible to pay no attention to them.

The thought of mostly disregarding grades stems from my feeling that grades don't adequately quantify or represent the gain that has been made through the course work. Basically, the point of course work is to learn how to be a lawyer. Basing the whole endeavor on a final letter grade seems inadequate, especially when the summation of the whole course is based on only one (or maybe 2) exams. Simply learning and exhaustively studying simply to be tested feels cheap. However, I don't know that there is any other way to both measure proficiency and give incentive for people to actually learn.

The fact is, though, that law school is still "school" and measurement of aptitude/proficiency/gain is necessary. Also, much of legal practice is adversarial and summated in a single win or lose outcome.

I think I was just having a late-night moment where I envisioned an ideal eutopia where law students push forward to develop their proficiency and acumen without pesky evaluation. Sort of like how Buddhist monks study/practice in a monastery towards achieving zen. But that's not how it works. Lol. Paying no attention to grades is probably a horrible strategy for success.

ReasonableNprudent wrote:I'm just not really a fan of the impending circle jerk/self-flogging-fest that comes with grades being released. People are usually lined up at the graphics/printing dept on the day they come out, anxiously and eagerly waiting. For most, the anxiety isn't pacified by receiving the grade.

The necessity of grades for OCI and the value of including good grades on resumes kind of makes it impossible to pay no attention to them.

The thought of mostly disregarding grades stems from my feeling that grades don't adequately quantify or represent the gain that has been made through the course work. Basically, the point of course work is to learn how to be a lawyer. Basing the whole endeavor on a final letter grade seems inadequate, especially when the summation of the whole course is based on only one (or maybe 2) exams. Simply learning and exhaustively studying simply to be tested feels cheap. However, I don't know that there is any other way to both measure proficiency and give incentive for people to actually learn.

The fact is, though, that law school is still "school" and measurement of aptitude/proficiency/gain is necessary. Also, much of legal practice is adversarial and summated in a single win or lose outcome.

I think I was just having a late-night moment where I envisioned an ideal eutopia where law students push forward to develop their proficiency and acumen without pesky evaluation. Sort of like how Buddhist monks study/practice in a monastery towards achieving zen. But that's not how it works. Lol. Paying no attention to grades is probably a horrible strategy for success.

is the bolded really something you believe?

Haha yeah I mean I've heard classes are supposed to teach you how to "think" like a lawyer, but even Professors dropped the idea class teaches how to be a lawyer a while ago for the most part.

zacharus85 wrote:Not sure entirely what the context is here - not looking at your grades post 1L from Fall or Spring semester?

If it's any time 2L or after - fine, you do you. Grades don't matter quite so much except around the margins (if you're gunning for latin honors or trying to avoid flunking).

For 1L though, I think it's a good idea to look at your grades reasonably soon after you get them. First, it's good to learn as quickly as possible how your efforts did or did not pay off while the classes before are still as fresh in your mind as possible. This is really more related to doing better later on if you feel the need to, which is in some conflict to my point about 2L/3L grades above.

More importantly, though, is looking at grades for OCI/hiring purposes. You'll want to figure out what firms at which you have a reasonable shot - and this means working with the grades you have. If they're not great, that sucks, but the goal of law school isn't feeling good about yourself; it's about hustling to get that jerb.

Granted, I went on the other end of the spectrum and plotted out potential grade spreads and how that would affect my chances at certain firms given our school's hiring history. This is neurotic and I don't recommend it.

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I'm pretty sure that the Sealocust, a former poster here, never looked at his grades after going through OCI. If you're going the biglaw route I can see getting away with that. As everyone else has said, I think you do at least have to look at 1L grades so you can plan for OCI. Personally, I couldn't have not looked because I'm too obsessive, but I also didn't go the biglaw route, so needed to look at them for clerkship and post-clerkship hiring.

Umm, you do realize TSL was ranked like 2nd in his class after 1L, and might have been the smartest poster we've had here. He didn't look at grades because he knew he was killing it in law school.

For the vast majority of law students who are at/around median, TSL's experience doesn't apply (Biglaw or not).

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I'm pretty sure that the Sealocust, a former poster here, never looked at his grades after going through OCI. If you're going the biglaw route I can see getting away with that. As everyone else has said, I think you do at least have to look at 1L grades so you can plan for OCI. Personally, I couldn't have not looked because I'm too obsessive, but I also didn't go the biglaw route, so needed to look at them for clerkship and post-clerkship hiring.

Umm, you do realize TSL was ranked like 2nd in his class after 1L, and might have been the smartest poster we've had here. He didn't look at grades because he knew he was killing it in law school.

For the vast majority of law students who are at/around median, TSL's experience doesn't apply (Biglaw or not).

Since when does knowing you're doing well stop most people from caring about grades? I also never said the OP should imitate TSL - he just asked if anyone had done this, and I gave an example of someone who had.

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I'm pretty sure that the Sealocust, a former poster here, never looked at his grades after going through OCI. If you're going the biglaw route I can see getting away with that. As everyone else has said, I think you do at least have to look at 1L grades so you can plan for OCI. Personally, I couldn't have not looked because I'm too obsessive, but I also didn't go the biglaw route, so needed to look at them for clerkship and post-clerkship hiring.

Umm, you do realize TSL was ranked like 2nd in his class after 1L, and might have been the smartest poster we've had here. He didn't look at grades because he knew he was killing it in law school.

For the vast majority of law students who are at/around median, TSL's experience doesn't apply (Biglaw or not).

TSL is a great guy who I respect a lot but come on. Even if law school grade success is our metric, which it definitely shouldn't be, for so many reasons, we had a prolific SCOTUS clerk, and many other people who were in the top few people in their class.

I had a friend who never, ever looked at his grades. This ended up being a problem because he failed a course 3L fall (I don't know how you manage to fail at a school that doesn't give real grades but he is special). He didn't know he failed it until the end of spring semester when the registrar told him he didn't have enough credits to graduate.

worldtraveler wrote:I had a friend who never, ever looked at his grades. This ended up being a problem because he failed a course 3L fall (I don't know how you manage to fail at a school that doesn't give real grades but he is special). He didn't know he failed it until the end of spring semester when the registrar told him he didn't have enough credits to graduate.

worldtraveler wrote:I had a friend who never, ever looked at his grades. This ended up being a problem because he failed a course 3L fall (I don't know how you manage to fail at a school that doesn't give real grades but he is special). He didn't know he failed it until the end of spring semester when the registrar told him he didn't have enough credits to graduate.

Don't be like my friend. Look at your grades.

Ah. The best reason to look at grades.

Also most things I've applied to for 1L summer at least require a transcript, so I don't really see how you'd download, save, and send that without looking at it.

worldtraveler wrote:I had a friend who never, ever looked at his grades. This ended up being a problem because he failed a course 3L fall (I don't know how you manage to fail at a school that doesn't give real grades but he is special). He didn't know he failed it until the end of spring semester when the registrar told him he didn't have enough credits to graduate.

I was hired last semester, and this is actually the primary reason I checked my fall 3L grades when they came out (because my fucks given = close to 0 once I got that offer). I was far more concerned about 1L grades (as those actually matter) than I am now. Now it's just making sure I hit the number of credits necessary to graduate.