Regent Circus development may be open at end of year

WORK on the Regent Circus Development is entering its final phase with a full opening expected either later this year or early next.

Ashfield Land, which owns the site, is expecting to finish the building work to the restaurants and cinema in September, before they are fitted out.

There have been a few delays which have pushed the work back but the Morrisons store it set to open in the autumn.

That half of the construction is complete, and the supermarket chain has spent the past month fitting out the premises ahead of opening.

When fully open, Regent Circus will have a multi-screen Cineworld along with a number of restaurant chains such as Nando’s, Coal and Prezzo.

James Digby, of Ashfield Land, said: “I would say we are now in the final stages of construction and we would expect building to be finished around mid-September.

“At that stage we will hand everything over to the tenants for fitting out so I would expect everything to open at either the end of the year or early next.

“We have had a few delays but that is construction. Everything is still progressing well and it will open as planned.”

Also opening at the £100m complex will be an Ask and Jimmy’s Spices, leaving two empty units.

Promoted stories

One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed.

“We have signed an agreement with another tenant so there is now only one left,” said Mr Digby.

“I am not in a position to say who it is at this stage but it is a national chain which everyone will have heard of.

“Talks are ongoing with a number of potential companies to take the final unit so I’m confident that will soon be filled.”

Although it was initially hoped the whole complex would open at around the same time, Morrisons will be opening several months before the rest of the site.

Share article

In May, a recruitment drive was started to employ around 200 workers which received a strong response.

A meeting is being held on Thursday when residents will have an opportunity to discuss any concerns they may have about the new road layout around the site which has caused concerns, among other issues. It will start at 6.30pm at the Civic Offices.

Promoted Stories

Comments (42)

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed''
I've always liked a good burger from a kitchenSimoJeff

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Score: 4

Al Smith says...9:22am Tue 5 Aug 14

In a way I'm glad it's going to take longer (though I'd like it to be open ASAP), as perhaps the Eastcott residents who didn't want longer working hours will then realise that actions have consequences.

In a way I'm glad it's going to take longer (though I'd like it to be open ASAP), as perhaps the Eastcott residents who didn't want longer working hours will then realise that actions have consequences.Al Smith

In a way I'm glad it's going to take longer (though I'd like it to be open ASAP), as perhaps the Eastcott residents who didn't want longer working hours will then realise that actions have consequences.

Score: -2

Futura says...9:40am Tue 5 Aug 14

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

[quote][p][bold]SimoJeff[/bold] wrote:
''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed''
I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen[/p][/quote]I don't know why all the secrecy. It's already listed on Gourmet Burger Kitchen's website!Futura

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit. The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.

[quote][p][bold]Futura[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]SimoJeff[/bold] wrote:
''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed''
I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen[/p][/quote]I don't know why all the secrecy. It's already listed on Gourmet Burger Kitchen's website![/p][/quote]Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit.
The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.Sandor Clegane

Futura wrote…

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit. The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.

Score: 7

Badgersgetabadname says...12:40pm Tue 5 Aug 14

"A meeting is being held on Thursday when residents will have an opportunity to discuss any concerns they may have about the new road layout around the site which has caused concerns, among other issues. It will start at 6.30pm at the Civic Offices." To what end, even if people turned up and said its unsuitable and will cause problems what are they going to do? Have the residents issues been settled from damages to surrounding buildings?

"A meeting is being held on Thursday when residents will have an opportunity to discuss any concerns they may have about the new road layout around the site which has caused concerns, among other issues. It will start at 6.30pm at the Civic Offices."
To what end, even if people turned up and said its unsuitable and will cause problems what are they going to do?
Have the residents issues been settled from damages to surrounding buildings?Badgersgetabadname

"A meeting is being held on Thursday when residents will have an opportunity to discuss any concerns they may have about the new road layout around the site which has caused concerns, among other issues. It will start at 6.30pm at the Civic Offices." To what end, even if people turned up and said its unsuitable and will cause problems what are they going to do? Have the residents issues been settled from damages to surrounding buildings?

Score: -6

Ollie Dognacky says...12:44pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Riveting 😴 Zzzz

Riveting 😴 ZzzzOllie Dognacky

Riveting 😴 Zzzz

Score: -9

house on the hill says...12:54pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Is going to be far better than what was there before and will be interesting to see the finished article at the end of the year. Wherever you put it someone would moan!

Is going to be far better than what was there before and will be interesting to see the finished article at the end of the year. Wherever you put it someone would moan!house on the hill

Is going to be far better than what was there before and will be interesting to see the finished article at the end of the year. Wherever you put it someone would moan!

Score: 4

matt71 says...1:17pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Futura wrote…

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit. The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.

Not correct there are two units currently not listed one of which will be GBK the other unit has not been leased yet,there is also a kiosk to fill.

[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Futura[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]SimoJeff[/bold] wrote:
''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed''
I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen[/p][/quote]I don't know why all the secrecy. It's already listed on Gourmet Burger Kitchen's website![/p][/quote]Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit.
The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.[/p][/quote]Not correct there are two units currently not listed one of which will be GBK the other unit has not been leased yet,there is also a kiosk to fill.matt71

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Futura wrote…

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit. The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.

Not correct there are two units currently not listed one of which will be GBK the other unit has not been leased yet,there is also a kiosk to fill.

Score: 0

Wildwestener says...1:21pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Al Smith wrote…

In a way I'm glad it's going to take longer (though I'd like it to be open ASAP), as perhaps the Eastcott residents who didn't want longer working hours will then realise that actions have consequences.

what like their evenings were disturbed like their days?

[quote][p][bold]Al Smith[/bold] wrote:
In a way I'm glad it's going to take longer (though I'd like it to be open ASAP), as perhaps the Eastcott residents who didn't want longer working hours will then realise that actions have consequences.[/p][/quote]what like their evenings were disturbed like their days?Wildwestener

Al Smith wrote…

In a way I'm glad it's going to take longer (though I'd like it to be open ASAP), as perhaps the Eastcott residents who didn't want longer working hours will then realise that actions have consequences.

what like their evenings were disturbed like their days?

Score: -4

Eastcott says...1:26pm Tue 5 Aug 14

This is a reheated non story re-written by the same lazy journalist responsible for this near identical feature from 6 weeks ago. http://www.swindonad vertiser.co.uk/news/ 11293568.The_changin g_face_of_our_town_c entre/ He obviously knocked it up quick with a few new photos to update it a bit in desperation to fill up half a page in today's edition of the tawdy rag. What makes it obvious is that James Digby's quote: “We have signed an agreement with another tenant so there is now only one left,” clearly relates to the Gourmet Burger Kitchen acquisition which was not made public when Benke wrote the original story, but is now common knowledge. Just read ther latest investment brochure form the developer. http://www.ashfieldl and.co.uk/wp-content /uploads/2014/06/RC- Brochure-2-June-2014 .pdf It's dismaying that the hack Adver 'journalist' couldn't even update this information correctly. It's no wonder the Adver is dying when it now costs 65p an issue yet is filled with weeks old non stories dressed up as new scoops.

This is a reheated non story re-written by the same lazy journalist responsible for this near identical feature from 6 weeks ago.
http://www.swindonad
vertiser.co.uk/news/
11293568.The_changin
g_face_of_our_town_c
entre/
He obviously knocked it up quick with a few new photos to update it a bit in desperation to fill up half a page in today's edition of the tawdy rag.
What makes it obvious is that James Digby's quote: “We have signed an agreement with another tenant so there is now only one left,” clearly relates to the Gourmet Burger Kitchen acquisition which was not made public when Benke wrote the original story, but is now common knowledge. Just read ther latest investment brochure form the developer.
http://www.ashfieldl
and.co.uk/wp-content
/uploads/2014/06/RC-
Brochure-2-June-2014
.pdf
It's dismaying that the hack Adver 'journalist' couldn't even update this information correctly.
It's no wonder the Adver is dying when it now costs 65p an issue yet is filled with weeks old non stories dressed up as new scoops.Eastcott

This is a reheated non story re-written by the same lazy journalist responsible for this near identical feature from 6 weeks ago. http://www.swindonad vertiser.co.uk/news/ 11293568.The_changin g_face_of_our_town_c entre/ He obviously knocked it up quick with a few new photos to update it a bit in desperation to fill up half a page in today's edition of the tawdy rag. What makes it obvious is that James Digby's quote: “We have signed an agreement with another tenant so there is now only one left,” clearly relates to the Gourmet Burger Kitchen acquisition which was not made public when Benke wrote the original story, but is now common knowledge. Just read ther latest investment brochure form the developer. http://www.ashfieldl and.co.uk/wp-content /uploads/2014/06/RC- Brochure-2-June-2014 .pdf It's dismaying that the hack Adver 'journalist' couldn't even update this information correctly. It's no wonder the Adver is dying when it now costs 65p an issue yet is filled with weeks old non stories dressed up as new scoops.

Score: 15

Davey Gravey says...1:33pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.Davey Gravey

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Score: -5

house on the hill says...1:41pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.[/p][/quote]Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.house on the hill

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

Score: 5

Sandor Clegane says...1:57pm Tue 5 Aug 14

matt71 wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Futura wrote…

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit. The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.

Not correct there are two units currently not listed one of which will be GBK the other unit has not been leased yet,there is also a kiosk to fill.

Er, that's what I said. GBK took the second to last unit, one full-size unit has been filled but the name not released and one kiosk unit remains unfilled. As I said, quite clearly I'd thought, "Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit"

[quote][p][bold]matt71[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Futura[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]SimoJeff[/bold] wrote:
''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed''
I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen[/p][/quote]I don't know why all the secrecy. It's already listed on Gourmet Burger Kitchen's website![/p][/quote]Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit.
The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.[/p][/quote]Not correct there are two units currently not listed one of which will be GBK the other unit has not been leased yet,there is also a kiosk to fill.[/p][/quote]Er, that's what I said.
GBK took the second to last unit, one full-size unit has been filled but the name not released and one kiosk unit remains unfilled.
As I said, quite clearly I'd thought, "Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit"Sandor Clegane

matt71 wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Futura wrote…

SimoJeff wrote…

''One of these has recently been filled although the name of the latest addition is yet to be revealed'' I've always liked a good burger from a kitchen

Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit, GBK were already known to have taken a unit. The remaining unit is a 'kiosk', so unlikely to be anything overly exciting.

Not correct there are two units currently not listed one of which will be GBK the other unit has not been leased yet,there is also a kiosk to fill.

Er, that's what I said. GBK took the second to last unit, one full-size unit has been filled but the name not released and one kiosk unit remains unfilled. As I said, quite clearly I'd thought, "Because that's not the chain that's taken the last remaining full-size unit"

Score: 3

Davey Gravey says...2:18pm Tue 5 Aug 14

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

[quote][p][bold]house on the hill[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.[/p][/quote]Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.[/p][/quote]The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.Davey Gravey

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

Score: -4

Eastcott says...2:27pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

It IS being preserved and turned into flats. Get with the programme!

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]house on the hill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.[/p][/quote]Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.[/p][/quote]The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.[/p][/quote]It IS being preserved and turned into flats. Get with the programme!Eastcott

Davey Gravey wrote…

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

It IS being preserved and turned into flats. Get with the programme!

Score: 8

Davey Gravey says...2:45pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Eastcott wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

It IS being preserved and turned into flats. Get with the programme!

Missed that. Last I'd read was it was that nothing was happening. Glad it's being preserved

[quote][p][bold]Eastcott[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]house on the hill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.[/p][/quote]Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.[/p][/quote]The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.[/p][/quote]It IS being preserved and turned into flats. Get with the programme![/p][/quote]Missed that. Last I'd read was it was that nothing was happening. Glad it's being preservedDavey Gravey

Eastcott wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

It IS being preserved and turned into flats. Get with the programme!

Missed that. Last I'd read was it was that nothing was happening. Glad it's being preserved

Score: -4

LordCharles says...3:37pm Tue 5 Aug 14

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?LordCharles

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?

Score: -8

GroundhogDay says...3:46pm Tue 5 Aug 14

LordCharles wrote…

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?

Easy - they've built a car park as park of the complex.

[quote][p][bold]LordCharles[/bold] wrote:
As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?[/p][/quote]Easy - they've built a car park as park of the complex.GroundhogDay

LordCharles wrote…

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?

Easy - they've built a car park as park of the complex.

Score: 11

Eastcott says...3:48pm Tue 5 Aug 14

LordCharles wrote…

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?

The development includes a 350 space car park . Do try to keep up.

[quote][p][bold]LordCharles[/bold] wrote:
As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?[/p][/quote]The development includes a 350 space car park . Do try to keep up.Eastcott

LordCharles wrote…

As you drive by (or walk by) there is a very high ugly wall that makes the site look like an industrial factory or warehouse. Well done planning department. Doomed to failure already. No nearby car park. Killer pedestrian walkways over "shared" areas (nearly got run over Saturday). So. Where do I park? Where can I safely cross from the library to the new site? Why is there an ugly wall next to the site?

The development includes a 350 space car park . Do try to keep up.

Score: 13

Badgersgetabadname says...3:59pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Genuine question, What are they going to do if people object to the system now?

Genuine question,
What are they going to do if people object to the system now?Badgersgetabadname

Genuine question, What are they going to do if people object to the system now?

Score: -7

Badgersgetabadname says...5:46pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Sandor / Channel X whatever....I am sitting here watching my float enjoying an hour or two of fishing which is why I have some time to follow the site but how am I to understand how the people of Swindon feel about anything when you fiddle the votes. I just dont know what to think anymore. You are a councilor in Swindon and a nice part of Swindon at that do you feel your voting abuse will benefit the conservatives in the next election? Its just if you do it shows massive contempt for other users of this site.

Sandor / Channel X whatever....I am sitting here watching my float enjoying an hour or two of fishing which is why I have some time to follow the site but how am I to understand how the people of Swindon feel about anything when you fiddle the votes.
I just dont know what to think anymore.
You are a councilor in Swindon and a nice part of Swindon at that do you feel your voting abuse will benefit the conservatives in the next election?
Its just if you do it shows massive contempt for other users of this site.Badgersgetabadname

Sandor / Channel X whatever....I am sitting here watching my float enjoying an hour or two of fishing which is why I have some time to follow the site but how am I to understand how the people of Swindon feel about anything when you fiddle the votes. I just dont know what to think anymore. You are a councilor in Swindon and a nice part of Swindon at that do you feel your voting abuse will benefit the conservatives in the next election? Its just if you do it shows massive contempt for other users of this site.

Score: -3

Badgersgetabadname says...5:46pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Sandor / Channel X whatever....I am sitting here watching my float enjoying an hour or two of fishing which is why I have some time to follow the site but how am I to understand how the people of Swindon feel about anything when you fiddle the votes. I just dont know what to think anymore. You are a councilor in Swindon and a nice part of Swindon at that do you feel your voting abuse will benefit the conservatives in the next election? Its just if you do it shows massive contempt for other users of this site.

Sandor / Channel X whatever....I am sitting here watching my float enjoying an hour or two of fishing which is why I have some time to follow the site but how am I to understand how the people of Swindon feel about anything when you fiddle the votes.
I just dont know what to think anymore.
You are a councilor in Swindon and a nice part of Swindon at that do you feel your voting abuse will benefit the conservatives in the next election?
Its just if you do it shows massive contempt for other users of this site.Badgersgetabadname

Sandor / Channel X whatever....I am sitting here watching my float enjoying an hour or two of fishing which is why I have some time to follow the site but how am I to understand how the people of Swindon feel about anything when you fiddle the votes. I just dont know what to think anymore. You are a councilor in Swindon and a nice part of Swindon at that do you feel your voting abuse will benefit the conservatives in the next election? Its just if you do it shows massive contempt for other users of this site.

Score: -4

Sandor Clegane says...6:10pm Tue 5 Aug 14

I am not a councillor. It is not my problem if you cannot understand that. Stop asking stupid questions that do not relate to me in any way. I've had enough of this nonsense. Sort your life out.

I am not a councillor. It is not my problem if you cannot understand that.
Stop asking stupid questions that do not relate to me in any way.
I've had enough of this nonsense. Sort your life out.Sandor Clegane

I am not a councillor. It is not my problem if you cannot understand that. Stop asking stupid questions that do not relate to me in any way. I've had enough of this nonsense. Sort your life out.

Score: 0

IWrestledABearOnce says...6:34pm Tue 5 Aug 14

I so don't care about anything you guys are saying..... us swindoners can finally get a decent burger, thats all that matter.

I so don't care about anything you guys are saying..... us swindoners can finally get a decent burger, thats all that matter.IWrestledABearOnce

I so don't care about anything you guys are saying..... us swindoners can finally get a decent burger, thats all that matter.

Score: 10

Sandor Clegane says...7:29pm Tue 5 Aug 14

IWrestledABearOnce wrote…

I so don't care about anything you guys are saying..... us swindoners can finally get a decent burger, thats all that matter.

Same here. Having these new, mid-market eateries in Swindon at least gives us a few more options. Looking forward to it all being open. It's a shame some people are obsessed with taking theads off topic. I honestly don't know what's wrong with them and it's a shame everyone else has to wade through their drivel.

[quote][p][bold]IWrestledABearOnce[/bold] wrote:
I so don't care about anything you guys are saying..... us swindoners can finally get a decent burger, thats all that matter.[/p][/quote]Same here. Having these new, mid-market eateries in Swindon at least gives us a few more options. Looking forward to it all being open.
It's a shame some people are obsessed with taking theads off topic. I honestly don't know what's wrong with them and it's a shame everyone else has to wade through their drivel.Sandor Clegane

IWrestledABearOnce wrote…

I so don't care about anything you guys are saying..... us swindoners can finally get a decent burger, thats all that matter.

Same here. Having these new, mid-market eateries in Swindon at least gives us a few more options. Looking forward to it all being open. It's a shame some people are obsessed with taking theads off topic. I honestly don't know what's wrong with them and it's a shame everyone else has to wade through their drivel.

Score: 8

Davey Gravey says...8:27pm Tue 5 Aug 14

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.Davey Gravey

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Score: -4

Localboy86 says...8:46pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

It's a bit creepy isn't it

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]It's a bit creepy isn't itLocalboy86

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

It's a bit creepy isn't it

Score: -1

Badgersgetabadname says...9:04pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Its just so boring now, I am interested in local events and what people think no matter if I agree or not most are capable of holding a decent debate. Its not worth going into points when one person using multi log ons attempts to cause arguments. Is the point of your comments to drive people from the site if so you are doing very well. I have no idea how you ever got a position on a local council you idiotic little man. BTW Your pathetic attempts to stalk my Twitter feed are laughable carry on all you like provides a chuckle. The utter contempt you have shown for the underprivileged, disabled and ex service people is disgusting. Considering your position you should be ashamed. Done with this for a while as it is pointless to debate with someone using multi log in`s that lies as much as you do and when asked direct questions turns into a child. Bye councilor Craig / Adver folk it cant be hard to ban IP addresses here this one is free. http://www.serverint ellect.com/support/w indowsserversecurity /ipsec-blockip/

Its just so boring now, I am interested in local events and what people think no matter if I agree or not most are capable of holding a decent debate.
Its not worth going into points when one person using multi log ons attempts to cause arguments.
Is the point of your comments to drive people from the site if so you are doing very well.
I have no idea how you ever got a position on a local council you idiotic little man.
BTW Your pathetic attempts to stalk my Twitter feed are laughable carry on all you like provides a chuckle.
The utter contempt you have shown for the underprivileged, disabled and ex service people is disgusting. Considering your position you should be ashamed.
Done with this for a while as it is pointless to debate with someone using multi log in`s that lies as much as you do and when asked direct questions turns into a child.
Bye councilor
Craig / Adver folk it cant be hard to ban IP addresses here this one is free.
http://www.serverint
ellect.com/support/w
indowsserversecurity
/ipsec-blockip/Badgersgetabadname

Its just so boring now, I am interested in local events and what people think no matter if I agree or not most are capable of holding a decent debate. Its not worth going into points when one person using multi log ons attempts to cause arguments. Is the point of your comments to drive people from the site if so you are doing very well. I have no idea how you ever got a position on a local council you idiotic little man. BTW Your pathetic attempts to stalk my Twitter feed are laughable carry on all you like provides a chuckle. The utter contempt you have shown for the underprivileged, disabled and ex service people is disgusting. Considering your position you should be ashamed. Done with this for a while as it is pointless to debate with someone using multi log in`s that lies as much as you do and when asked direct questions turns into a child. Bye councilor Craig / Adver folk it cant be hard to ban IP addresses here this one is free. http://www.serverint ellect.com/support/w indowsserversecurity /ipsec-blockip/

Score: -3

Sandor Clegane says...9:25am Wed 6 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.Sandor Clegane

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Score: 3

Davey Gravey says...9:35am Wed 6 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.[/p][/quote]Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip!
Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.Davey Gravey

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Score: -2

Sandor Clegane says...10:18am Wed 6 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Thank you for finally admitting it. Not that we didn't already know.

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.[/p][/quote]Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip!
Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.[/p][/quote]Thank you for finally admitting it. Not that we didn't already know.Sandor Clegane

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Thank you for finally admitting it. Not that we didn't already know.

Score: -3

Sandor Clegane says...10:22am Wed 6 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Also, I'm really not going to bother with this nonsense again. If you can't realise people are sick of your posts about 'thumbs' and 'councillors' then that's your problem. The only way you can continue your lies if I respond to you, so I will not be doing so any longer. Carry on with your madness if you wish, but ask yourself exactly why you find a newspaper comments section to have taken over your life entirely.

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.[/p][/quote]Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip!
Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.[/p][/quote]Also, I'm really not going to bother with this nonsense again. If you can't realise people are sick of your posts about 'thumbs' and 'councillors' then that's your problem.
The only way you can continue your lies if I respond to you, so I will not be doing so any longer. Carry on with your madness if you wish, but ask yourself exactly why you find a newspaper comments section to have taken over your life entirely.Sandor Clegane

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Also, I'm really not going to bother with this nonsense again. If you can't realise people are sick of your posts about 'thumbs' and 'councillors' then that's your problem. The only way you can continue your lies if I respond to you, so I will not be doing so any longer. Carry on with your madness if you wish, but ask yourself exactly why you find a newspaper comments section to have taken over your life entirely.

Score: -2

Davey Gravey says...10:29am Wed 6 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Thank you for finally admitting it. Not that we didn't already know.

You fool virtually nobody now. South stand will wake up to you in time as well. Trying to blame the one who caught you out with your own behaviour is laughable. You've Been caught so many times now. How long until you get banned again and create yet another log in? Why the desperation to look like you win any argument on here? Is it that important?

[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.[/p][/quote]Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip!
Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.[/p][/quote]Thank you for finally admitting it. Not that we didn't already know.[/p][/quote]You fool virtually nobody now. South stand will wake up to you in time as well. Trying to blame the one who caught you out with your own behaviour is laughable. You've Been caught so many times now.
How long until you get banned again and create yet another log in?
Why the desperation to look like you win any argument on here? Is it that important?Davey Gravey

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Thank you for finally admitting it. Not that we didn't already know.

You fool virtually nobody now. South stand will wake up to you in time as well. Trying to blame the one who caught you out with your own behaviour is laughable. You've Been caught so many times now. How long until you get banned again and create yet another log in? Why the desperation to look like you win any argument on here? Is it that important?

Score: 0

Davey Gravey says...12:17pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Also, I'm really not going to bother with this nonsense again. If you can't realise people are sick of your posts about 'thumbs' and 'councillors' then that's your problem. The only way you can continue your lies if I respond to you, so I will not be doing so any longer. Carry on with your madness if you wish, but ask yourself exactly why you find a newspaper comments section to have taken over your life entirely.

Im not lying and that grates you so much I know. That's why you've targetted my posts for months now. Your attempts to flip it onto me as some kind of paranoia fools a few for a while but they soon see through you. Glad to hear you won't respond. I will continue to highlight your abuse of this website though unless you quit your obsessive behaviour and abuse of it.

[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores.
Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.[/p][/quote]Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.[/p][/quote]Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip!
Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.[/p][/quote]Also, I'm really not going to bother with this nonsense again. If you can't realise people are sick of your posts about 'thumbs' and 'councillors' then that's your problem.
The only way you can continue your lies if I respond to you, so I will not be doing so any longer. Carry on with your madness if you wish, but ask yourself exactly why you find a newspaper comments section to have taken over your life entirely.[/p][/quote]Im not lying and that grates you so much I know. That's why you've targetted my posts for months now.
Your attempts to flip it onto me as some kind of paranoia fools a few for a while but they soon see through you. Glad to hear you won't respond. I will continue to highlight your abuse of this website though unless you quit your obsessive behaviour and abuse of it.Davey Gravey

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Sandor Clegane wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

How do cleganes comments get +18 votes with pretty ordinary comments above, yet nobody else is anywhere near that? Most in fact have - scores. Are his comments that popular? We all know the answer to that one.

Because you rigged the voting just so you could post that comment. Pretty obvious.

Yeah sure. I multiple down vote everyone else including myself and up vote you. Get a grip! Those scores were like that hours before I made that observational comment. keep digging that hole you are in.

Also, I'm really not going to bother with this nonsense again. If you can't realise people are sick of your posts about 'thumbs' and 'councillors' then that's your problem. The only way you can continue your lies if I respond to you, so I will not be doing so any longer. Carry on with your madness if you wish, but ask yourself exactly why you find a newspaper comments section to have taken over your life entirely.

Im not lying and that grates you so much I know. That's why you've targetted my posts for months now. Your attempts to flip it onto me as some kind of paranoia fools a few for a while but they soon see through you. Glad to hear you won't respond. I will continue to highlight your abuse of this website though unless you quit your obsessive behaviour and abuse of it.

Score: 0

MCdjGperkyWicked says...1:41pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Why would the town ever need good shops surely the natives make do with charity and pound shops.

Why would the town ever need good shops surely the natives make do with charity and pound shops.MCdjGperkyWicked

Why would the town ever need good shops surely the natives make do with charity and pound shops.

Score: 0

house on the hill says...2:13pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Davey Gravey wrote…

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

Yes but this is Swindon where it clearly doesn't! So rather then let it fall down like many other buildings just left to rot, at least something is being done with it!

[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]house on the hill[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote:
Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.[/p][/quote]Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.[/p][/quote]The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.[/p][/quote]Yes but this is Swindon where it clearly doesn't! So rather then let it fall down like many other buildings just left to rot, at least something is being done with it!house on the hill

Davey Gravey wrote…

house on the hill wrote…

Davey Gravey wrote…

Looking forward to it opening. Much needed. Shame they appear to be wrecking grand old buildings in the process though.

Everything has its day. Without progress and leaving the past behind we would still be living in caves and chasing our dinner with a spear! The previous building had become a real eyesore, lets look on the positive side of this development for a change.

The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.

Yes but this is Swindon where it clearly doesn't! So rather then let it fall down like many other buildings just left to rot, at least something is being done with it!

Score: -1

Ollie Dognacky says...3:11pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Good grief! It's hardly surprising that Sandor Clegane aka ChannelX was also banned from the Talk Swindon web for exactly the same reasons. Multiple logins, abuse to others, goading, and general troll activities. I have enough faith in the Adver to predict that some more of his logins will soon be barred

Good grief!
It's hardly surprising that Sandor Clegane aka ChannelX was also banned from the Talk Swindon web for exactly the same reasons.
Multiple logins, abuse to others, goading, and general troll activities.
I have enough faith in the Adver to predict that some more of his logins will soon be barredOllie Dognacky

Good grief! It's hardly surprising that Sandor Clegane aka ChannelX was also banned from the Talk Swindon web for exactly the same reasons. Multiple logins, abuse to others, goading, and general troll activities. I have enough faith in the Adver to predict that some more of his logins will soon be barred

Score: 0

Ollie Dognacky says...3:16pm Wed 6 Aug 14

House On The Hill, *The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere......... Yes but this is Swindon where it clearly doesn't!........* Why should that be? I know of at least one person that thought Swindon would be a pleasant town after admiring the Town Hall....... Do you think that should also be replaced?

House On The Hill,
*The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere.........
Yes but this is Swindon where it clearly doesn't!........*
Why should that be?
I know of at least one person that thought Swindon would be a pleasant town after admiring the Town Hall.......
Do you think that should also be replaced?Ollie Dognacky

House On The Hill, *The red bricked college building could and should be preserved. Mix the old with the new. It works elsewhere......... Yes but this is Swindon where it clearly doesn't!........* Why should that be? I know of at least one person that thought Swindon would be a pleasant town after admiring the Town Hall....... Do you think that should also be replaced?

Score: 0

MCdjGperkyWicked says...3:24pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Such a load of old tosh.... Who would shop in town anyway I much prefer going out to surrounding villages and getting quality. Leave Greggs and charity shops to the peasants. This development will make no difference.

Such a load of old tosh....
Who would shop in town anyway I much prefer going out to surrounding villages and getting quality.
Leave Greggs and charity shops to the peasants.
This development will make no difference.MCdjGperkyWicked

Such a load of old tosh.... Who would shop in town anyway I much prefer going out to surrounding villages and getting quality. Leave Greggs and charity shops to the peasants. This development will make no difference.

Score: -6

Eastcott says...8:01pm Wed 6 Aug 14

MCdjGperkyWicked wrote…

Such a load of old tosh.... Who would shop in town anyway I much prefer going out to surrounding villages and getting quality. Leave Greggs and charity shops to the peasants. This development will make no difference.

YOU are talking a load of tosh. The Harvester near Blunsdon is packed out daily despite being open now for about 18 months. Do you really think with the footfall of the densely populated town centre people won't be flocking to Nandos, GBK, Jimmy's etc. Everyone has been crying out for this complex to open, for years. It's going to do a roaring trade, guaranteed. It's boring reading ignorant NIMBY's talking out of their backside on here, it really is!

[quote][p][bold]MCdjGperkyWicked[/bold] wrote:
Such a load of old tosh....
Who would shop in town anyway I much prefer going out to surrounding villages and getting quality.
Leave Greggs and charity shops to the peasants.
This development will make no difference.[/p][/quote]YOU are talking a load of tosh. The Harvester near Blunsdon is packed out daily despite being open now for about 18 months. Do you really think with the footfall of the densely populated town centre people won't be flocking to Nandos, GBK, Jimmy's etc. Everyone has been crying out for this complex to open, for years. It's going to do a roaring trade, guaranteed. It's boring reading ignorant NIMBY's talking out of their backside on here, it really is!Eastcott

MCdjGperkyWicked wrote…

Such a load of old tosh.... Who would shop in town anyway I much prefer going out to surrounding villages and getting quality. Leave Greggs and charity shops to the peasants. This development will make no difference.

YOU are talking a load of tosh. The Harvester near Blunsdon is packed out daily despite being open now for about 18 months. Do you really think with the footfall of the densely populated town centre people won't be flocking to Nandos, GBK, Jimmy's etc. Everyone has been crying out for this complex to open, for years. It's going to do a roaring trade, guaranteed. It's boring reading ignorant NIMBY's talking out of their backside on here, it really is!

Score: 1

CllrDJGAZZAperky@HaydenMaSS says...10:00pm Wed 6 Aug 14

Well no doubt it will make the plebs feel like they are shopping in something more upmarket than they are used to. Its a silk hat for a pig

Well no doubt it will make the plebs feel like they are shopping in something more upmarket than they are used to.
Its a silk hat for a pigCllrDJGAZZAperky@HaydenMaSS

Well no doubt it will make the plebs feel like they are shopping in something more upmarket than they are used to. Its a silk hat for a pig

Score: -4

Sandor Clegane says...9:19pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname wrote…

Genuine question, What are they going to do if people object to the system now?

Peasants like you should know your place. Sick of having to explain everything to you.

[quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote:
Genuine question,
What are they going to do if people object to the system now?[/p][/quote]Peasants like you should know your place.
Sick of having to explain everything to you.Sandor Clegane

Badgersgetabadname wrote…

Genuine question, What are they going to do if people object to the system now?

Peasants like you should know your place. Sick of having to explain everything to you.

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standardards Organisations's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a compaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here