Spaceballs – the debris

Full story here – Click the image above for a large view of the object.

Me thinks it is from either of these spacecraft:

The Vostok had a whole ring of spherical tanks, and maybe and old piece of space junk from one of the old service modules finally came home.

Image: Bohams auction house

Only the main sphere is kept in re-entry, everything else is discarded.

From Space.com

Though given the trajectory when the service package is jettisoned, and because Vostok flight was in the early 1960’s, it seems doubtful such objects would remain in orbit, though possible if they “skipped” off the atmosphere after jettison.

Another candidate is the Soyuz, still in use today:

Under the shroud of the instrumentation support module there are a number of spherical tanks, as seen in this diagram:

Diagram from the New York Times

UPDATE:Well I was half right, it is a tank from a Russian spacecraft. Niels shows an example from Argentina:

93 thoughts on “Spaceballs – the debris”

If you loved the old simulation moon landers from the early days of computers, there is a new software package that allows you to design, build and fly your own craft. My daughter and I are competing to see who gets out of orbit regularly first. http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/ The physics package is supposed to be correct. What you do with your design is up to you.

Warning, this game should come with a warning. It can easily become addicting, causing issues like wrist fatigue and carpel tunnel, from having to much fun.

Aren’t these balls predicted by one of the GCM’s??
Thought I read in the AR4 a warning that as the earth warmed due to human emissions of CO2, steel balls could fall from the sky. Could be wrong, maybe it was a pre-press release of AR5.

There could be religious significance here too….The Gods Must Be Crazy III??

It’s 1.1 meters in diameter and weighs 6 kg.
It has low density- surface area of human and far lighter. Human has terminal velocity of 180 mph.
So this might fall around 100 mph?
Yet it makes:
“a hole 33 centimetres deep and 3.8 meters wide”
If from space it would fall vertically and making such a deep hole seems unlikely. And “3.8 meters wide” makes no sense.
In others words since it has low density I would think it would lose any orbital velocity and fall at it’s terminal velocity.
If it was filled with water or liquid oxygen/nitrogen it would be far more density- weigh a ton instead 6 kg and impact at a much higher velocity.

This is unequivocal, most likely caused by humans, poses a dire threat to all life on earth, will only increase in frequency with life on earth completely transformed by the year 2020. In a sense, it was a confirmation of what we knew was going to happen anyway. The thing that worries is the rate of change, the pace at which this is going to happen. This has been a wake-up call; the canary in the coal mine for the rest of the world.
The only responsible solution is to set up a large bureaucratic agency, throw billions of tax dollars at it and establish a space balls tax/trading scheme.

Merchandising! Merchandising! Where the real money from the movie is made. Spaceballs: the T-shirt, Spaceballs: the coloring book, Spaceballs: the lunch box, Spaceballs: the breakfast cereal, Spaceballs: the flamethrower–the kids love this one–last but not least, Spaceballs: the debris!

Nah, It’s a baby Death Star.. Thank God we got to it before it ‘got all growd up’..
AGW would have been the least of our worries…..

Come to think of it, the Death Star gives the ultimate hockey stick temp profile for a planet, the ultimate Global Warmer….. Maybe Mr. Mann needs to go an investigate some samples of its’ rings.. There is a large enough sample source for him, one… I’m sure those statistics could bear him some fruit.

“You misread. 1.1 meters in circumference, not diameter.”
The picture caption said “A photo provided by the National Forensic Science Institute shows a giant metallic ball, 1.1 metre in diameter and weighing some 6 kilograms (13 pounds), that fell out of the sky on a remote grassland in Namibia.”

But I agree it seems more likely it’s 14″ in diameter- and seems strangely common for some reason. Helium is stored at high pressure- needing thick walls. That makes sense- it would hit the ground at a high velocity- slightly slower than a cannon ball.

Actually, it appears to be an American Orbiting Spy Ball. Namibia apparently shot it down using technology borrowed from Iran.

Barak Obama is very upset, and has asked that the Spy Ball be returned immediately. Upon getting a frosty “no” from Namibia, Obama changed his position to “pretty please give me my spy thingy back?”

Namibia responded with an encrypted message that has been submitted to the new supercomputer at NOAA for decrypting. An Obama spokesmonkey says the code appears very difficult to crack, but it shouldn’t be more than a few days to determing what “ROFLMAO” actually means.

My vote is:
a) right from FOIA him/herself. After that person must have balls of steel.
b) looks like it might come from a ball mill (used to grind ore) in a mineral processing plant.
If you cut it open and there’s a password inside then…not from a ball mill.

I don’t believe the explanation provided. Just another government coverup.

It is obvious to me this space relic is the remnants of the tank float from the toilet facilities on the crashed Roswell NM alien spacecraft. This answers the highly important question of why it crashed shortly after entering the earth’s atsmosphere. Averaged model runs utilizing the new NOAA-CRAY Gaea computer have robustly determined the heat of entry ignited the copious quantities of decomposing, methane producing alien scat. It also explains why hi-tech indoor toilet fixtures became universally available shortly after the crash. Of course, earthling fixtures are made of more readily available sustainable materials.

I am not at liberty to disclose additional details, except that the models provided no data on where the bidet ended up.

Briff:”Oi! Phil!”
Philj: “Whadya want Briff me old spudgun?”
Briff: “Look, Manns got this *new* theory about these ere spaceballs in Namibia. Says he’s positive the models show a clear correlation to climate change. He reckons theres a hockey connection in there too”.
Philj: “Can we get it in AR5 dya think?”
Briff: “Darn right we can, even if it means redefining what the peer reviewed literature is”.
Philj: “Hey! Ive heard that somewhere before im sure, if only i could get my excel working!
Anyways,Thats so cool man! And if we offer up scary scenarios it should get some major coverage right?”.
Briff: “You better believe it kiddo and those research grants will just come a flooding in”.
Philj: “But what happens if those proper scientists start asking awkward questions about the brilliant climastrology we do here?”
Briff: ” Well, we’ll just decline, wont we?”.
PhilJ: “And hide too?”.
Briff: “Absolutely buddy, all in plain sight”.

During the height of the cold war back in the early 60’s my teenaged dad found a similar titanium sphere in a farm field in Canterbury New Zealand. Was much officious self important behaviour from local authorities who were probably thrilled to feel vaguely relevant to the global conflict such as it was at the time. Was also Russian in Origin – and given very 50+ year old Soyuz design may even have been off the same model of rocket.

If I lived in Namibia and had some time on my hands, I would build a catapult, find some ball mill balls and see how far I could chuck those suckers. If I ever found a newspaper article about people thinking they were from a space ship – well – I’d just throw one or two every year just to tease their stupidity.

The increasing frequency of falling spaceballs has lead scientists at UEA to model their frequency in relation to GHG emissions.
Startling new results show strong corellation between metal objects appearing unexpectedly on the Earth and Atmospheric CO2 emissions.
“When we removed all known natural signals from the analysis we were were left with the conclusion that this was of anthropogenic origin.”
“We ran our models using the A1B emission scenario and project that the earth will be completely covered in titanium by the year 2100”
The authors of the study say that this is probably linked to global warming.

Reaujere says:
December 23, 2011 at 10:35 am
Not from the Salyut 7 (it re-entered in Feb. 1991). My guess would be part of the RCS from the Zenit 2nd stage from the Russian’s Phobos-Grunt mission.
~
Guess we all knew that the Russians have balls..
~
M.A.Vukcevic says:
December 23, 2011 at 2:39 pm
NASA should take a note: Spherical objects with a titanium outer ‘skin’ can survive the atmosphere reentry intact.

“”..This is the SECCHI COR-1 (inner coronagraph) image on the STEREO-B satellite. From the perspective of STEREO-B, the comet moved diagonally across the face of the Sun, looped around it, and re-emerged from around the back. The comet is obvious to see as it enters the camera in the lower right. We lose sight of the head of the comet at ~2300UT as it disappears behind the occulting disk. (We superimposed a Sun image on the movie — this camera doesn’t actually see that.) Then at around 0130UT we see the bright tail of the comet appear again in the upper-left of the image and continue to move out. Here’s the fun part: this is not the comet itself! Keep watching, and at ~0530UT you’ll see the comet — minus a tail! — emerge on the right hand side of the central disk and move towards the lower-right of the image, finally exiting at ~10:45UT.
So if the comet re-emerges on the right without its tail, does that mean the bright thing that flew out of the top-left of the image is its tail?? Absolutely! I summarize the situation here. What we’re seeing is the comet streaming into our field of view with a vast cloud of dust and ice trailing in its wake. The comet reaches the Sun, loops sharply around it, and head out around the back of the Sun. But the tail material we see has already left the comet and is just going to carry on in a straight line from the time it was ejected, while at the same time be pushed away from the Sun by the radiation pressure from the Sun itself. So we’re actually seeing the tail material sweeping out towards us, while the comet races off to do its own thing.
OK, why does Lovejoy not have a tail after it reappears? How did it get torn off? Well it didn’t actually get “torn off”, as it was never physically connected to begin with, but what likely happened was that the dust and ice produced by the comet was no longer able to follow the comet in its path as the relatively dense and incredibly hot solar corona “captured”..””http://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/images/lovejoy/lovejoy_20111215b_cor1.movhttp://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/index.php?p=news/birthday_comet#bottom

The worst offenders of space debris, in terms of ability to survive re-entry relatively intact, appear to be titanium spherical pressure vessels used for pressurized fuels,This link will show a pic of one that survived rentry which is identical with the one that fell in Namibia. .It’s from a Delta II titanium pressure vessel, which often survive re-entry intact.
….http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=33760&p=440180#p440180

Titanium oxides are very bright white, bronze or violet. Titanium composition is highly probable!
“metal alloy known to man” Nah… Obviously this assembly is part of the super spectrometer the “Grey” has used to detect that atmosphere of Earth was subject to a “catastrophic” increase of Carbon(IV) oxide, revealing how dangerous the human “pest” really is, mandating it’s immediate eradication!!!
Maybe after all, aliens are not grey but green like in the good old time when they were coming from Mars…

Did anyone catch the Geminid meteor shower this year? It was one of the best I’ve ever seen and there was a full moon. I was wondering if meteor showers appear brighter if the atmosphere they pass through is colder? Or can less activity from the sun influence the magnetosphere some how to effect smaller objects entering the atmosphere? there was more fireballs this year which was amazing to see. I’m convincing my self of a physical link. Anyone got a thought on this?

If that things made out of almost pure titanium its worth its weight in gold… or titanium as its going for a alot per ounce nowadays.
——————————————————
Nah, I’ve bought a lot of titanium lately and it’s not 1/10 the price of gold. The aerospace industry usually uses Ti6Al4V alloy. That’s a standard storage sphere (probably hydrazine) used by everybody. That crater size looks too big for that sphere though. Next time I’m at my desk at work I can calculate the terminal velocity, if anybody on here is interested.

If I did it right, and assuming the sphere was empty and it landed at sea level, the terminal velocity is about 2400 cm/sec or 80 ft/sec. Given that, I’m surprised a the size of the hole.
Of course, as noted if the tank had contents the weight and therefore the terminal velocity would be greater.

Wis. Public Radio during the overnight does BBC programing overnight.
News report today said, “that a piece of Russian space debris, crashed through a roof in Siberia on Cosmonaut St..???
Now is that wild or what? Cosomonaut St.. ding dong ..

Russian satellite hits Siberia’s ‘Cosmonaut Street’
December 24, 2011 by Stuart Williams
The Meridian communications satellite failed to reach orbit Friday due to a failure with its Soyuz rocket, raising new concerns over the Russian space programme which has now lost over half a dozen satellites in the last year.

Its fragments crashed into the Novosibirsk region of central Siberia and were found in the Ordynsk district around 100 kilometres (60 miles) south of the regional capital Novosibirsk.

“A sphere was found, around 50 centimetres (20 inches) in diameter, which crashed into the roof of a house in the village of Vagaitsevo” in the Ordynsk district, an official in the local security services told the Interfax news agency.

In an extraordinary irony, the official said that the house was located on Cosmonaut Street, named after the heroic spacemen of the Soviet and Russian space programme.

A lot has been said and many speculations have been made about the risk of space debris hitting populated area’s. All scientist agreed the odds were incredibly small. Most of the debris would burn up into our atmosphere and those parts surviving the heat would fall into the ocean.

So what exactly is the chance of a Russian satellite fragment hitting a house at Cosmonaut Street on Christmas eve?
Well, from today this chance is 100%.