Things Known and Unknown

On every project there are things we know and things we don’t know – Knowns and Unknowns. Organizing your thoughts around those concepts can be a constructive approach to understanding a project as shown in the matrix below:

Knowns

Unknowns

Knowns

Known Knowns

Things in our plan

Known Unknowns

Things we know we don’t know

Unknowns

Unknown Knowns

Assumptions

Unknowns Unknowns

??

The Known Knowns you handle via the plan, but what about those various flavors of Unknowns? How do you normally account for those things in the project? Often it’s with padding – estimates that include unidentified amounts of time and/or money just in case.

Let’s review how padding works: You ask your tech lead, Renee, for an estimate: “Excuse me, I need an estimate for that activity you’ll be doing.” Now Renee may be thinking to herself “That will take me about 40 hours.” But Renee doesn’t tell you that. She may very likely tell you “Um, that’ll take about 60 hours.”

Why would she do this and, more importantly, so what? First, she’s doing it to cover her Unknowns. And that is absolutely understandable. Stuff happens – Unknowns! So what’s the problem?

Padding undermines sound project management practice in three ways:

1. It undermines trust. The notion that it’s a good idea to under promise and over deliver may work once or twice, but over time padding undermines the trust between the PM and the team and the rest of the stakeholders. Honest questions should inspire honest answers. That’s how you foster partnerships.

2. Have closets, will fill. If Renee says 60 hours, she may very well take 60 hours and that’s opportunity cost. She isn’t able to be allocated to other efforts.

3. Padding undermines the opportunity to learn from our experience, which in many ways is the essence of why we seek to develop good project management habits. What you want to be able to do at the end of a project is turn around and look at the journey you took to get there and be able to take something away for next time.

If you pad estimates and quite possibly end up with nonsense for baselines, what do you learn from that? Certainly not as much as you could have had you started with meaningful estimates to begin with.

Let’s say Renee is thinking 40 hours, she tells us 60, and then she comes in at 50. What do you think? Renee’s a star! But what really happened? She was 25% over! If you are measuring against meaningless numbers, you don’t get much of a chance to make the PM journey a learning experience.

Importantly, the intention here is not to highlight Renee’s failures. Rather, the purpose is to identify and understand the Unknowns that derailed the work and consider how to avert those things in the future or plan for them next time.

This is all well and good, but Renee still has her Unknowns to contend with, so what might you do to partner with her to address those?

The better project management answer to Unknowns is contingency reserves, an amount of money in the budget or time in the schedule seen and approved by management. It is documented. It is measured and therefore managed. You draw from it where and when you need to and then learn from that, as well.

The purpose of the contingency reserve is not to 100% cover everyone’s Unknowns, but rather to reduce them to a level that is acceptable to the stakeholders. So maybe it’s 10% of the project total if stakeholders aren’t too risk averse and you feel bullish about what you know and don’t know. Or maybe it’s 40% on a project with highly risk adverse stakeholders and a big box of Unknown Unknowns.

Knowns we can plan for. The Unknowns? We have two choices for how to deal with those. Under the table with padding which precludes any discussion, measurement, or management of what contributes to the Unknowns. Or Contingency Reserve in which case we talk about them, document them, measure and manage them. Only one way really enables us to learn from them.

Don't forget to leave your comments below.

Andrea Brockmeier is the Client Solutions Director for Project Management at Watermark Learning. Andrea is a PMP® as well as Certified ScrumMaster. She has 20+ years of experience in project management practice and training. She writes and teaches courses in project management, including PMP® certification, as well as influencing skills. She has long been involved with the PMI® chapter in Minnesota where she was a member of the certification team for over eight years. She has a master’s degree in cultural anthropology and is particularly interested in the impact of social media and new technologies on organizations and projects.

Andrea Brockmeier is the Director of Project Management for Watermark Learning. Andrea is an experienced trainer, facilitator, speaker, and project manager, with over 25 years of business experience. Andrea oversees certification and skills development curriculum in project management, business analysis, and leadership. She has been a speaker at IIBA® and PMI® conferences and is an active volunteer. She enjoys practicing what she teaches and has a steady stream of projects that she manages. Andrea is highly committed to partnering with her clients through projects, consulting, and training, and seeks to make every engagement enjoyable as well as valuable.