tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-210749842019-08-06T04:59:11.392-07:00Operation Billiards - Mitrokhin or Oshchenko ?Blog of Michael John Smith. I am seeking the truth behind the conspiracy that led to my conviction under the UK Official Secrets Act. E-mail me at parellic@googlemail.commjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comBlogger233125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-79596531627463525172015-02-10T17:56:00.002-08:002015-05-09T17:22:38.424-07:00Tony Holland & Geoffrey Dickens dossier - British media frightened to publish the details!<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Michael Portillo has recently been named in association with the <a href="https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2015/02/08/the-paedofile-mi5-gave-geoffrey-dickens-michael-portillos-name-for-his-dossier" target="_blank">Geoffrey Dickens dossier</a> on the SLOG website.&nbsp;Leon Brittan is also referred to in this post, as he is in an <a href="https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2015/02/05/the-paedofile-tribune-unearths-military-intelligence-spook-who-supplied-names-for-dickens-dossier" target="_blank">earlier publication</a> on SLOG.&nbsp;These posts, and several more on other websites, are duplicating issues raised by Andrew Rosthorn in his explosive article in <a href="http://www.tribunemagazine.org/2015/02/ex-spook-admits-giving-big-big-names-to-sex-dossier-mp" target="_blank">Tribune magazine</a> on 4th February 2015.&nbsp;Other people referred to in the Tribune article include Sir Peter Hayman and Peter Sutcliffe (the “Yorkshire Ripper”).</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The naming of people such as these ‘great and the good’, and the nervousness of journalists to publish any revelations coming from Tony Holland, has caused some to dismiss Tony as being ‘not credible’ - how could Tony have had access to the events and people he claims to have known during his life? However, as we all know instinctively, when the call goes out to suppress a story, and to “rubbish” the messenger, it is usually those facing the embarrassment who prove to be the key agents responsible for such censorship.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">In a case such as Tony Holland’s we can be certain that it is the corrupt and guilty in the Establishment who really have the motive to suppress the truth. Why has there been so much dithering and bungling over the recent attempts to set up an inquiry into historical child sex abuse, involving MPs and other important members of the Establishment? When the full story unfolds it will be evident to everybody, about just who has something to hide, perhaps because they are the paedophiles, or the friends of paedophiles, and the disgusting habits which they picked up in one of our “public” schools, or on the playing fields of Eton.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">In contrast, Tony Holland has an impeccable background, ever since his earliest stages as a businessman. Tony’s father-in-law was Lieutenant Philip Matrel MC, the highest ranking medal holder on the Channel Islands. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/military-obituaries/special-forces-obituaries/9163726/Philip-Martel.html" target="_blank">Philip Martel died in 2012</a>.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-e_eeWPluIv0/VNq-jgNBOAI/AAAAAAAAAzk/mzVPA1F4v9I/s1600/Philip%2BMartel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-e_eeWPluIv0/VNq-jgNBOAI/AAAAAAAAAzk/mzVPA1F4v9I/s1600/Philip%2BMartel.jpg" width="244" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Philip Martel</b></span></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Philip Martel’s uncle was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giffard_Le_Quesne_Martel" target="_blank">Sir Giffard Le Quesne Martel</a>, another high ranking military man who had great history in the development of tanks and his association with supporting the defence of Britain against the Nazi threat.</span><br /><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-oLhu61m5b6E/VNq-7iDBgAI/AAAAAAAAAzs/Ae-zzRxzTUw/s1600/Giffard%2BMartel%2BPortrait.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-oLhu61m5b6E/VNq-7iDBgAI/AAAAAAAAAzs/Ae-zzRxzTUw/s1600/Giffard%2BMartel%2BPortrait.jpg" width="246" /></a></div><div style="text-align: right;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Giffard Martel</b></span></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MwA5DSsSEQA/VNq_crsKIEI/AAAAAAAAAz0/07C5e_yck1M/s1600/Giffard%2BMartel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="269" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MwA5DSsSEQA/VNq_crsKIEI/AAAAAAAAAz0/07C5e_yck1M/s1600/Giffard%2BMartel.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Giffard Martel with Winston Churchill</b></span></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">But Tony Holland went on to become friends and business partners with several high profile people, who went on to become High Court Judges. For example, I have already published documents that prove how Tony was involved <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/stuart-hyde-ipcc-investigation.html" target="_blank">in buying a property</a> that became a major Conservative Party Northern headquarters with Derek Kennigham, who was the principal partner of solicitors firm of Lumb and Kenningham, who were the defence team for the Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe. Tony has already exposed that Lumb and Kenningham were under investigation for tax fraud at the time they were asked to defend Sutcliffe, and Tony maintains that serious legal issues were swept under the carpet to allow that prosecution to proceed, no doubt with the intervention of Sir Michael Havers.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The basic details from above will lead any reasonable person to ask the question: why was Tony Holland charged with a trumped up charge of assisting a burglar, and then exiled to Australia, when he had friends like this to help him? We all know the answer to that question - Britain remains a very class ridden and legally corrupt country, and Tony was not one of “them”, because he came from a poor community in Bradford. So those who considered themselves part of that ruling class used their hold on Britain’s population by manipulating the control of the Britain’s mass media, through saying what could be released on TV, radio, and the bulk of the popular newspapers.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Little wonder then, that the little man “Associate Editor” of the Daily Mirror, Kevin Maguire, refused to publish such a basic story that Tony Holland was involved in giving Geoffrey Dickens MP that damning dossier of Establishment sex criminals. Such media professionals should not be called journalists - they are merely the puppets of the British Ruling Class. “Publish and be dammed” I say - go forth and multiply you professional incompetents.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZyhWaJ4JVcg/VNrA8IqoxqI/AAAAAAAAA0A/sabGE22Ngww/s1600/Tony%2B%2BHolland%2B%26%2BStella%2BRimington.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZyhWaJ4JVcg/VNrA8IqoxqI/AAAAAAAAA0A/sabGE22Ngww/s1600/Tony%2B%2BHolland%2B%26%2BStella%2BRimington.jpg" width="315" /></a></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Tony Holland and Stella Rimington</b></span></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Tony Holland’s other friends acquaintances include Dame Stella Rimington. Rimington was also too scared in 2009 to say what she knows, and I guess we will have to wait for her puppet masters to tell her what to say in 2020 or perhaps when all the guilty are either dead or gaga.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">More details about the Tony Holland story and his book <i><b>Just between Friends</b></i> can be found on his publisher <a href="http://www.hudson-publishing.com/" target="_blank">Nick Hudson's website</a>.</span></div></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/hLcitO2pnOw" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2015/02/tony-holland-geoffrey-dickens-dossier.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-12735006770837581182014-08-01T16:30:00.001-07:002014-08-01T16:32:28.747-07:00Jay Fredericks (Director) - is the Rio Tinto Roughrider Project stealing from Canadian First Nation?<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tJOajFT2-KQ/U9weLqGWLGI/AAAAAAAAAyU/vNaDFzKFth8/s1600/Jay+Fredericks.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tJOajFT2-KQ/U9weLqGWLGI/AAAAAAAAAyU/vNaDFzKFth8/s1600/Jay+Fredericks.jpg" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Jay Fredericks</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">It seems that the First Nation <a href="http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/2013-014EISappendixHWollastonPublic" target="_blank">is being conned by Rio Tinto</a>. The First Nation were approached by Rio Tinto to allow the mining of uranium, and the 2 people concerned were Jay Fredericks and Sharon Singh.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The First Nation will get royalties and benefit from numerous initiatives put to them by Rio Tinto, and after mining is over Rio Tinto will make good the rivers, lakes, and the land will return to the way it was before.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">The First Nation is not being told about the need for Tailings Dams, and the tendency for waste to leach or run over into the natural environment, caused by rain, snow, sun.</span><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/dFb-JEbTWy8" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2014/08/jay-fredericks-director-is-rio-tinto.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-57219488055654124722013-06-21T03:53:00.002-07:002013-06-21T03:53:57.898-07:00Stella Rimington "spy on neighbour" criticized on Voice of Russia<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Stella Rimington has been <a href="http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_06_21/Stella-Rimington-made-her-career-on-case-against-innocent-man-Holland-0174/" target="_blank">severely criticized</a> today (Tony Holland interview) and in a <a href="http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_05_30/When-spies-call-for-more-spying-Rimington-called-on-Britons-to-be-eyes-and-ears-of-security-services-5716/" target="_blank">recent article</a> on the Voice of Russia radio station, after she was quoted as saying it would be a good idea for neighbours to spy on each other. This was a reaction to the murder of the soldier Lee Rigby, but it has brought attention back to the role of Rimington as the past Director of MI5 and how she had herself behaved during her time with the Security Service.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">It is my honest belief that Stella Rimington gave false evidence during my trial in 1993. It was her testimony in Court - such as her claim that my innocent holiday in Oporto in 1977 was cover for meeting a Russian KGB officer - which led the jury to convict me. In reality she had to testify under oath that MI5 had no evidence that I had met Viktor Oshchenko, however, that was the Prosecution case she was supporting. By exaggerating and making circumstantial evidence appear to be incriminating, Rimington twisted out a story that gave the impression to the jury that it was all true.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">How ironic that Rimington now makes a living out of telling fictional stories about imaginary spies. Perhaps my case was good training for her in this skill at inventing characters and plots to entertain a reader?</span><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/RRUYJBZ0LXA" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2013/06/stella-rimington-spy-on-neighbour.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-43021463097728810152013-03-19T17:52:00.000-07:002013-03-19T17:52:11.824-07:00Gerard P. Burke & Oleg Gordievsky evidence at my trialOleg Gordievsky lied at my trial, as did Professor Merion Francis Lewis. I had almost forgotten the trauma and upset that it caused when&nbsp;I&nbsp;realised that&nbsp;people&nbsp;were lying under oath at my trial. This is usually called perjury, or&nbsp;perverting&nbsp;the course of justice, but it doesn't upset those hypocrites involved in the&nbsp;British Justice&nbsp;system.<br /><br />So why has Gerard P. Burke not come&nbsp;forward&nbsp;and supported my case? He was&nbsp;overwhelmingly in favour of my case during trial, but when the case was over&nbsp;he disappeared into&nbsp;the&nbsp;background.<br /><br />I have been answering questions on <a href="http://intelnews.org/2013/03/13/01-1215/#comment-20887">another website</a>, and that is what has caused this new&nbsp;situation.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/qGru2RMbUb8" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2013/03/gerard-p-burke-oleg-gordievsky-evidence.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-64980677730733708622012-10-23T13:08:00.001-07:002012-10-23T13:09:52.578-07:00West Yorkshire Police - more papers<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">West Yorkshire Police are under more criticism today with Sir Norman Bettison being asked to resign. Earlier examples of cover-ups are published below from Tony Holland's papers. This is discussed on <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/uk.legal/DSHdU6BGeM0">UK Legal here</a>:</span><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FGX4hyjzgkk/UIb4Hh1jFTI/AAAAAAAAAqY/f03rI1MtaHQ/s1600/Geoffery+Lane.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FGX4hyjzgkk/UIb4Hh1jFTI/AAAAAAAAAqY/f03rI1MtaHQ/s320/Geoffery+Lane.jpg" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Geoffrey Land to Don Veitch 26 Sept 1989</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ABYWUr98NV4/UIb4KZiNVvI/AAAAAAAAAqg/6cRhKZzlXeI/s1600/Sampson+to+Nobes.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ABYWUr98NV4/UIb4KZiNVvI/AAAAAAAAAqg/6cRhKZzlXeI/s320/Sampson+to+Nobes.JPG" width="231" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Colin Sampson to Peter Nobes Sept 1990</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><br /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/v0Z9moOZX4k" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2012/10/west-yorkshire-police-more-papers.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-11972529541543815672012-09-29T09:32:00.002-07:002012-09-29T09:37:57.465-07:00Lumb & Kenningham tax investigation - Peter Sutcliffe<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Lumb and Kenningham solicitors were facing an investigation into their tax affairs by the Inland Revenue from 1980. This arose from a business partnership they were in with Tony Holland. Documents will be posted below, and can be discussed on <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/MLF2-h6OHh8">UK Legal</a>:</span><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YGWFDZSWCzM/UGchnQLodlI/AAAAAAAAApI/F77HZGV28TM/s1600/Inland+Revenue+4+Oct+79.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YGWFDZSWCzM/UGchnQLodlI/AAAAAAAAApI/F77HZGV28TM/s320/Inland+Revenue+4+Oct+79.jpg" width="220" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Inland Revenue 4 October 1979&nbsp;</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LrjzNgAyCh0/UGchrHOLKMI/AAAAAAAAApQ/QKe6x5z5NnY/s1600/Michael+Jack+letter.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="257" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LrjzNgAyCh0/UGchrHOLKMI/AAAAAAAAApQ/QKe6x5z5NnY/s320/Michael+Jack+letter.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Michael jack</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pNL5klWadEg/UGchtuXXk1I/AAAAAAAAApY/qp974bYRT8c/s1600/Lord+Hailsham.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pNL5klWadEg/UGchtuXXk1I/AAAAAAAAApY/qp974bYRT8c/s320/Lord+Hailsham.jpg" width="221" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Lord Hailsham</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/bYFXzZJXOmM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2012/09/lumb-kenningham-tax-investigation-peter.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-21496846837856067392012-09-25T17:38:00.000-07:002014-05-08T12:09:18.525-07:00Stuart Hyde & the death of Melvin Hodgson<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Stuart Hyde has come under more attack from Tony Holland, who has published more documents involving this Chief Constable, suspended from duty following allegations of misconduct. This has been discussed on <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/1PAC79-o-GM">UK Legal</a>.</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Australian Deputy Premier Robert Fordham wrote to the British Home Secretary on Mr Holland's behalf. John Patten was one of the 3 Home Secretaries to be involved in negotiations over his case. Below is one of the letters in correspondence&nbsp;between&nbsp;them:</span><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RaoRhht-cUA/UGJKFORMUZI/AAAAAAAAAoM/EGnaD1vcHm8/s1600/John+Patten's+Letter+to+Robert+Fordham+p.1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RaoRhht-cUA/UGJKFORMUZI/AAAAAAAAAoM/EGnaD1vcHm8/s320/John+Patten's+Letter+to+Robert+Fordham+p.1.jpg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from John Patten to Robert Fordham p1</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Ul_-HOEuIiw/UGJKJxi-JzI/AAAAAAAAAoU/f4IcQ9RsTLM/s1600/John+Patten's+Letter+to+Robert+Fordham+p.2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Ul_-HOEuIiw/UGJKJxi-JzI/AAAAAAAAAoU/f4IcQ9RsTLM/s320/John+Patten's+Letter+to+Robert+Fordham+p.2.jpg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from John Patten to Robert Fordham p2</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9mD5iJevSUA/UGJKPqTZ4LI/AAAAAAAAAoc/aJDY2P79Abw/s1600/Robert+Fordham's+Letter+to+John+Patten+p.1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9mD5iJevSUA/UGJKPqTZ4LI/AAAAAAAAAoc/aJDY2P79Abw/s320/Robert+Fordham's+Letter+to+John+Patten+p.1.jpg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Robert Fordham to John Patten p1</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gqASUxTSU7E/UGJKTpT5t1I/AAAAAAAAAok/Zr5mfGH5fMI/s1600/Robert+Fordham's+Letter+to+John+Patten+p.2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gqASUxTSU7E/UGJKTpT5t1I/AAAAAAAAAok/Zr5mfGH5fMI/s320/Robert+Fordham's+Letter+to+John+Patten+p.2.jpg" height="320" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Robert Fordham to John Patten p2</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Police HMI Sir Colin Sampson was also implicated in advising Chief Constable Peter Nobes about the danger of Tony Holland seeing the Hodgson file:</span><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SfBrqbDVvgw/UGJKXr37nRI/AAAAAAAAAos/kpDFVVuBiZU/s1600/Nobes+to+Sampson.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SfBrqbDVvgw/UGJKXr37nRI/AAAAAAAAAos/kpDFVVuBiZU/s320/Nobes+to+Sampson.JPG" height="320" width="231" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Peter Nobes to Sir Colin Sampson</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-soiXsrWU-jM/UGJKZxaG0pI/AAAAAAAAAo0/ueChbD8_8fc/s1600/Dennin1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-soiXsrWU-jM/UGJKZxaG0pI/AAAAAAAAAo0/ueChbD8_8fc/s320/Dennin1.jpg" height="320" width="206" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Lord Denning apologises to Tony Holland</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Tony Holland's biography is now available <a href="http://www.hudson-publishing.com/id66.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/c8eoureP2Fo" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2012/09/stuart-hyde-death-of-melvin-hodgson.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-33342067073840557332012-09-25T15:19:00.000-07:002012-09-25T15:21:34.129-07:00Stuart Hyde IPCC Investigation<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Stuart Hyde is to be investigated by the IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) following a complaint by Tony&nbsp;Holland. The following documents are discussed on <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/Qt6pTyO3x_4">UK Legal</a>:</span><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--HB8qNe6w6w/UGIsKFgxqrI/AAAAAAAAAng/OCsn6UZedfA/s1600/Tony+Holland+IPCC+application+25+Sept+2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--HB8qNe6w6w/UGIsKFgxqrI/AAAAAAAAAng/OCsn6UZedfA/s320/Tony+Holland+IPCC+application+25+Sept+2012.jpg" width="210" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>IPCC Complaint application by Tony Holland</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1Kxdr2sXxgQ/UGIsSnw-JGI/AAAAAAAAAno/InpUNsApH48/s1600/kenningham+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1Kxdr2sXxgQ/UGIsSnw-JGI/AAAAAAAAAno/InpUNsApH48/s320/kenningham+1.jpg" width="227" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Land Transfer Form p.1</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sCNCXeLId_g/UGIsk1STsWI/AAAAAAAAAnw/y8xp09DnvWk/s1600/kenningham2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sCNCXeLId_g/UGIsk1STsWI/AAAAAAAAAnw/y8xp09DnvWk/s320/kenningham2.jpg" width="230" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Land Transfer Form p.2</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-adog8Z1-hfI/UGIsndELnKI/AAAAAAAAAn4/Sp1jWmtTknc/s1600/Vilindra.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-adog8Z1-hfI/UGIsndELnKI/AAAAAAAAAn4/Sp1jWmtTknc/s320/Vilindra.jpg" width="224" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Certificate of Incorporation for Vilindra Company</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/HPuLvQjo6TM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2012/09/stuart-hyde-ipcc-investigation.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-2634670757339062082012-09-22T17:53:00.002-07:002012-10-01T13:28:38.078-07:00Stuart Hyde Chief Constable misconduct allegations<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Stuart Hyde has been&nbsp;accused&nbsp;of misconduct. Tony Holland was unhappy about the way Hyde dealt with his CCRC (Criminal Case Review Commission) application. Below are some of the documents that reveal anomalies in his case:</span><br /><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n30O5q3Yl0g/UF5cUYiPqII/AAAAAAAAAmo/2ZGSmeC4HAQ/s1600/ccrc1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n30O5q3Yl0g/UF5cUYiPqII/AAAAAAAAAmo/2ZGSmeC4HAQ/s320/ccrc1.jpg" width="266" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Excerpt from CCRC&nbsp;Application</b></span></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_CYYwc2_Jas/UF5caOPhUSI/AAAAAAAAAmw/83ql77Oq35k/s1600/judgement+1.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_CYYwc2_Jas/UF5caOPhUSI/AAAAAAAAAmw/83ql77Oq35k/s320/judgement+1.JPG" width="232" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Appeal Judgement p.1</b></span></div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7pziioUf_H4/UF5cjDHkcOI/AAAAAAAAAm4/4pq3A44X1RY/s1600/judgement+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7pziioUf_H4/UF5cjDHkcOI/AAAAAAAAAm4/4pq3A44X1RY/s320/judgement+2.jpg" width="232" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Appeal Judgement p.2</b></span></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vHO3NTVbT9s/UF5clE7MMLI/AAAAAAAAAnA/ZpvSqha0o_Y/s1600/judgement+3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vHO3NTVbT9s/UF5clE7MMLI/AAAAAAAAAnA/ZpvSqha0o_Y/s320/judgement+3.jpg" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Appeal Judgement p.3</b></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WtQNoyb-4EY/UF5cm_qc0bI/AAAAAAAAAnI/cxnmTARrEvw/s1600/Sampson.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WtQNoyb-4EY/UF5cm_qc0bI/AAAAAAAAAnI/cxnmTARrEvw/s320/Sampson.JPG" width="232" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Letter from Deputy Chief Constable Sampson</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">This topic is being discussed on UK&nbsp;Legal&nbsp;<a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/eRhparq4GZc">here</a>.</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Further documents have been added relating to the involvement of Home Secretary David Waddington referred to on <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/TFfXY0F-4zc">UK Legal</a>:</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-p3YR63gY3Tk/UGn7fTvmSvI/AAAAAAAAAps/wpowRuVyIDo/s1600/Fordham+3+May+91+p1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-p3YR63gY3Tk/UGn7fTvmSvI/AAAAAAAAAps/wpowRuVyIDo/s320/Fordham+3+May+91+p1.jpg" width="221" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Robert Fordham letter 3 May 1991 p.1</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1sNRYAyF1s8/UGn7h3muOCI/AAAAAAAAAp0/keC8_cz-dL0/s1600/Fordham+3+May+91+p2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1sNRYAyF1s8/UGn7h3muOCI/AAAAAAAAAp0/keC8_cz-dL0/s320/Fordham+3+May+91+p2.jpg" width="169" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Robert Fordham letter 3 May 1991 p.2</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fJLgQ9KXVmo/UGn7jFSsz4I/AAAAAAAAAp4/GcOSpCnL2Ws/s1600/Fordham+3+May+91+p3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fJLgQ9KXVmo/UGn7jFSsz4I/AAAAAAAAAp4/GcOSpCnL2Ws/s320/Fordham+3+May+91+p3.jpg" width="210" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Robert Fordham letter 3 May 1991 p.3</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-h8-QJ3CaIl8/UGn7kU3iwuI/AAAAAAAAAqE/NYh0n34VxOw/s1600/Werrett+18+Aug+93.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-h8-QJ3CaIl8/UGn7kU3iwuI/AAAAAAAAAqE/NYh0n34VxOw/s320/Werrett+18+Aug+93.jpg" width="200" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Dr D. J. Werrett letter 18 August 1993</b></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div><br /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/PBTaOTtVo1g" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2012/09/stuart-hyde-chief-constable-misconduct.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-28334294902229019012012-02-03T14:14:00.000-08:002016-06-19T09:38:03.835-07:00Innocent Holiday used as Circumstantial Evidence<span style="font-family: &quot;verdana&quot; , sans-serif;">In 1992 the CIA plotted with MI5 in an attempt to fabricate evidence to frame me. In 1976 I went on a holiday to Canada and the USA and I travelled around by Greyhound bus. What a suspicious thing to do, you must be thinking? Well, in the minds of MI5 this is just the sort of evidence they can twist into proof of guilt.</span><br /><div><span style="font-family: &quot;verdana&quot; , sans-serif;">Below is a copy of the map that was given to me by a friend in Chicago:</span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uKs_aM7O2Fk/TyylbiWbG6I/AAAAAAAAAk4/rP_Wl3O3qSU/s1600/Downtown+Chicago+Map.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uKs_aM7O2Fk/TyylbiWbG6I/AAAAAAAAAk4/rP_Wl3O3qSU/s320/Downtown+Chicago+Map.jpg" width="150" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: &quot;arial&quot; , &quot;helvetica&quot; , sans-serif;"><b>Map of Downtown Chicago</b></span></div><span style="font-family: &quot;verdana&quot; , sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: &quot;verdana&quot; , sans-serif;">A number of locations are circled. At the top is the place where my friend worked, there is also a circle around the Greyhound bus station, and others at the Sears Tower and the Arts Centre. To me this was all innocent, as these were places I visited while I was there, and I went to the top of Sears Tower during my stay. Far from the reality of what I actually did in Chicago, MI5 were desperate to make it appear that I was on a KGB mission, and the CIA were there to help check out the details to try to incriminate me.</span><br /><span style="font-family: &quot;verdana&quot; , sans-serif;"><br />MI5 asked Viktor Oshchenko to say something that would help to make the Chicago visit appear to be sinister, and in his meeting with MI5 he did his best: :. </span><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><i>‘[Oshchenko] was shown the marked map of Downtown Chicago and asked for his comments. …. [Smith] was sent on the trip, paid for by the KGB, to establish contacts and friends and to reconnoitre the possibilities of obtaining a job out there. …. [Oshchenko] thought that the ringed buildings and numbers might, therefore, represent universities, research establishments or contact addresses’.</i></b><br /><br /><span style="font-family: &quot;verdana&quot; , sans-serif;">At my friend's recommendation I spent some time on a <a href="http://www.architecture.org/page.aspx?pid=600">guided tour</a> organised by the Chicago ArchiCenter. It was very interesting to visit a number of buildings in the city that had played a part in the development of architecture, including examples by the famous architect Frank Lloyd Wright. Below is the front cover of the leaflet describing the guided tours, and I even kept the ticket I bought for that tour. I have never understood the relevance of this for a KGB mission, but that is the sort of lie that MI5 had to use in order to ensure that I would be convicted.</span><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-UC-fQ1GFvEE/Tyyl1NryWII/AAAAAAAAAlA/ZMZLLTtSeBg/s1600/Chicago+ArchiCenter+Leaflet.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-UC-fQ1GFvEE/Tyyl1NryWII/AAAAAAAAAlA/ZMZLLTtSeBg/s320/Chicago+ArchiCenter+Leaflet.jpg" width="137" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: &quot;arial&quot; , &quot;helvetica&quot; , sans-serif;"><b>Chicago ArchiCenter Leaflet</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6wOhxO3TWw0/TyymFHe-RGI/AAAAAAAAAlI/mESIQ2LJCWo/s1600/Chicago+ArchiCenter+Ticket.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="168" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6wOhxO3TWw0/TyymFHe-RGI/AAAAAAAAAlI/mESIQ2LJCWo/s320/Chicago+ArchiCenter+Ticket.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: &quot;arial&quot; , &quot;helvetica&quot; , sans-serif;"><b>Chicago ArchiCenter Ticket</b></span></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><br /><br /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/jikaJGNe61E" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com1http://parellic.blogspot.com/2012/02/innocent-holiday-used-as-circumstantial.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-12748442003628181162011-12-20T15:21:00.000-08:002014-05-08T12:13:33.177-07:00Richard Prokopanko (Director at Rio Tinto) in Sharon Singh legal scandal<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Richard Prokopanko (a Director of Rio Tinto), and based in British Columbia Canada, has been implicated in a legal scandal according to the e-mail correspondence I have seen (below). &nbsp;Doubts have been raised about the status of Sharon Singh when she resided in Australia:</b></span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TUd3LsZBIfw/TvEhtdwclyI/AAAAAAAAAkM/9DDTf8DXPmI/s1600/Richard+Prokopanko.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TUd3LsZBIfw/TvEhtdwclyI/AAAAAAAAAkM/9DDTf8DXPmI/s320/Richard+Prokopanko.jpg" height="320" width="253" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">Richard Prokopanko</b></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"></span><br /><div style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></span></div><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>From:</b> Mr J Holland</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>Sent:</b> December-19-11 11:01 PM</span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>To:</b> "Honourable Minister Shirley Bond",&nbsp;<shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca=""><shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca=""><a href="mailto:Shirley.Bond.MLA@leg.bc.ca">Shirley.Bond.MLA@leg.bc.ca</a><br />"Maria Dupuis OIPC:EX",&nbsp;<mdupuis oipc.bc.ca=""><mdupuis oipc.bc.ca=""><a href="mailto:mdupuis@oipc.bc.ca">mdupuis@oipc.bc.ca</a><br /><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:info@bcorl.ca">info@bcorl.ca</a><br /><a href="mailto:QuestionsLobbying@ocl-cal.gc.ca">QuestionsLobbying@ocl-cal.gc.ca</a><br /><a href="mailto:ajohnson@theprovince.com">ajohnson@theprovince.com</a><br /><a href="mailto:lgrindlay@theprovince.com">lgrindlay@theprovince.com</a><br /><b>Subject:</b> Concerning un ethical registraion to the BC government.<br /> <br />20th December 2011.<br /><br />The Attorney General:<br /><br />The Hon S Bond.<br /><br />Dear Madam<br /><br />Ref: Richard Prokopanko and Sharon Singh..Rio Tinto registered lobbyists.<br /><br />I wish to place before you several criminal and other unethical matters which Prokopanko has not seen fit to inform your Government about.<br /><br />You may feel Prokopanko has committed a criminal offense and should be prosecuted.<br /><br />Mr. Prokopanko has caused the registration of Ms Singh as a lobbyist to your Government and he has at all times been aware of the following:<br /><br />1. Ms Singh’s arrest record for dishonesty in Australia.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (** - see below)<br /><br />Ms Singh was arrested in 2000 and placed before Australian Courts for using 4 different names to improperly gain employment here.<br /><br />Now if that were all of Ms Singh’s peccadilloes I would not be writing to you today, however, Prokopanko is well aware that Ms Singh has a history working for members of a notorious organized crime group forming partnerships with Paul Reed and Don Campbell, and Benji Venimen all ex drug traffickers, Read and Venimen had convictions for manslaughter and murder, respectively here in Australia. Additionally Prokopanko was well aware that Ms Singh had improperly obtained a job with Rio Tinto Iron Ore in Perth, Western Australia by falsely claiming to be an Australian citizen when she wasn’t and she did not have a proper Australian visa to work in Australia, and in obtaing that emploment she was acting contrary to her earlier court appearances when she was warned not to try to work again without proper authority but perhaps a more pertinent complaint against Singh would be:<br /><br />That she gained an improper registration to practice law in Australia using deceit, an offense for which she would face criminal prosecution here in Australia.<br /><br />The way she did this was.<br /><br />a) Not to inform the legal Practice Board in Western Australia that:<br /><br />1) She did not have permission to work in Australia.<br /><br />2) But she did inform the practice board that she had worked for the president of the Victorian Supreme Court, Maxwell J. when this was not the case and was most certainly untrue.<br /><br />3) She did not tell the practice board she had an arrest record for using 4 false names to gain un lawful employment.<br /><br />4) She did not tell the practice board that she had been fired for theft of dog biscuits at Sims supermarket.<br /><br />5) She did not tell the practice board that she had ongoing relationships with several high profile notorious criminals.<br /><br />I think these matters are serious enough in themselves to be put before you, but of course there is much more to be revealed regarding the character and ethics of both Singh and Prokopanko than these outlines above. I am sure however, prudent simple enquiries as to suitability to lobby your Government would be revealing and may well prevent an international embarrassment.<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />Tony Holland<br />( former Victorian Government Prison Visitor).<br /><br />I shall be only too happy to send to you court documents’ and other items proving any matters referred above, no doubt however your police department can be of some help in advising.</mdupuis></mdupuis></shirley></shirley></span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca=""><shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca=""><mdupuis oipc.bc.ca=""><mdupuis oipc.bc.ca=""><strong><em>** Ms Singh was fired from her employment after being suspected of the theft of 6 bottles of Penfolds Grange wine (value $500/bottle) from paraplegic Ian Wolstenholm.</em></strong></mdupuis></mdupuis></shirley></shirley></span><br /><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /><b>The Minister responsible, the Honourable Shirley Bond, has responded with the following reply:</b><br /><br /><br /><b>From:</b> "Honourable Minister Shirley Bond" <shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca=""><br /><b>To:</b> Mr J Holland<br /><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:40 AM<br /><b>Subject:</b> RE: Concerning un ethical registraion to the BC government.<br /><br />Dear Mr. Holland,<br /><br />Thank you for contacting me with your concerns. As this is my constituency email address and your concern is related to the Attorney General ministry, your email will be forwarded to my Ministry email address. A staff member from the Ministry will be in contact with you as soon as possible.<br /><br />Again, thank you for contacting me, your concerns are important to me.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br />Shirley Bond, MLA<br />Prince George – Valemount<br /><br />Public Safety and Solicitor General<br />Acting Attorney General</shirley></span><br /><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca=""><br /></shirley></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><shirley .bond.mla="" leg.bc.ca="">Tony Holland's biography is now available from <a href="http://www.hudson-publishing.com/id66.html" target="_blank">this page</a>.</shirley></span><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/srsR3jJBVtY" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/12/richard-prokopanko-director-rio-tinto.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-91294118384246121152011-11-29T16:57:00.000-08:002011-11-29T18:18:37.834-08:00Zatuliveter - Gordievsky lied to support paranoid MI5 numbskulls<span class="Apple-style-span">Katya Zatuliveter <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15935411">has been cleared</a> of the accusation of being a Russian spy. I couldn't see what other decision the Court could come to - at least it appeared to be obvious to me when I gave <a href="http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/11/21/60766849.html">an interview</a> to Voice of Russia last week.<br /><br />One of the aspects that concerned me was that MI5 had acted unprofessionally in this case, particularly because of the paranoia that they seem to exhibit whenever a Russian is involved with a politician in Britain. Katya has stated the same view in her <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15952555">interview with the BBC</a>, when she said that MI5 were <i>'unprofessional and paranoid'</i>.</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">This institutional paranoia that permeates MI5 makes them see potential espionage activity from every Russian that arrives in the UK, and Katya says of MI5's attitude, that <i>'if you're Russian in this country you're a spy'</i>.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">So where does this leave our resident defector and chief MI5 ass-licker Oleg Gordievsky, who was so outspoken about the guilt of Miss Zatuliveter?<br /><br />As early as <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-24001664-katia-is-most-successful-russian-spy-in-30-years-says-top-soviet-defector.do">October 2010</a> Gordievsky was condemning her as a Russian spy, in <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8185810/Russian-spies-they-cant-take-their-eyes-off-us.html">various</a> British national daily newspapers. Gordievsky's <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052827/Katia-Zatuliveter-best-KGB-agent-30-years-claims-colonel.html">views</a> appear to have been used as major "evidence" against Katya. His sensationalist descriptions of Katya were circulated all around the world as some sort of exposure of her by a man who must know the truth in such situations - an ex-colonel in the KGB.<br /><br /></span></div><div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span"> <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-n4W1zyEhYuM/TtWJXcfkfuI/AAAAAAAAAkA/nqfXUpCMejE/s1600/The%2BRussian%2BParrot.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-n4W1zyEhYuM/TtWJXcfkfuI/AAAAAAAAAkA/nqfXUpCMejE/s400/The%2BRussian%2BParrot.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5680597540876353250" style="cursor: pointer; width: 109px; height: 400px; " /></a><br /><b>A very loquacious bird that talks a little too much for his own good</b></span></div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span">Well, after all the nonsense that Gordievsky has talked in the past year, I wonder why he is so silent today? It is all very well having a spokesperson to spread your lies all over the media, but when the truth is finally revealed, is it the parrot or the master who has bird shite all over their face?</span></div></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span">We all know - because it is no secret that Gordievsky is a spokesperson for MI5 and MI6 - that he was put up to spreading the lies about Miss Zatuliveter. However, who is footing the bill for Gordievsky's incompetent and over-zealous attacks on Katya? Is it the British tax-payer who is supplying the money that makes Gordievsky talk, every time the British Intelligence Services need a bit of dirty propaganda splashed around the tabloids?</span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span">If British Intelligence are so incompetent, that they have to frame an innocent 26 year-old woman to create the illusion that they are great "spy-catchers", then what does this say about the organisation and the management of MI5?</span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span">Surely the Zatuliveter case clearly demonstrates what idiots we have supposedly protecting our National Security in Britain. MI5 must be the laughing stock of the intelligence world!</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/vUTaHTqzVqA" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com2http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/11/zatuliveter-gordievsky-lied-to-support.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-34439028292524196632011-11-21T15:42:00.000-08:002016-06-01T17:38:53.523-07:00Katya Zatuliveter, Oleg Gordievsky & the Cambridge Parrot<span class="Apple-style-span">Katya Zatuliveter has been in the news recently. I think she has been much maligned by the British Security Service (MI5) in order to gain some political advantage. I gave <a href="http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/11/21/60766849.html">an interview</a> a few days ago to the Voice of Russia radio station, to try to put the record straight.</span><br /><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Due to the limitations of a radio interview some parts of my interview had to be cut. For example, I talked about my Member of Parliament, Andrew Mackinlay MP:</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Commentator:</b> Do you know of other cases where Members of Parliament have been criticised for being connected to a Russian?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Michael John Smith:</b> In 2008 my own MP, Andrew Mackinlay, was targeted in<a href="http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1034583/Kremlin-praises-MP-carpeted-meeting-Russian-spy.html"> a smear campaign</a>, simply because he had been having meetings with a Russian diplomat in the Houses of Parliament. Mr Mackinlay was a member of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, so it was not unusual for him to have meetings with foreign representatives. Unfortunately, the paranoia of MI5 came into action, and stories suddenly started appearing in the newspapers that Mr Mackinlay was involved in something sinister, and that espionage might be involved.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Commentator:</b> Surely, just talking with a diplomat doesn’t amount to spying?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Michael John Smith: </b>No, I agree, but I believe in Mr Mackinlay’s case he became a target because he had asked probing questions in Parliament about issues that embarrassed the Government. For example, he was concerned about Britain’s involvement in the war in Iraq - he knew that Prime Minister Tony Blair had lied about the motives for the war. A smear campaign was an effective way to stop Mr Mackinlay causing embarrassment to the British Government and its Intelligence Services. Mr Mackinlay retired as an MP in 2010, but he did call for the British security services to be ‘brought under control’ for claiming there were too many Russian spies in the UK.<br /><br />It seems that MI5 are acting more like <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/28/mi5-russian-spy-investigation?INTCMP=SRCH">Inspector Clouseau</a>, rather than a sort of George Smiley character. However, Oleg Gordievsky, that ex-spy brought out at such occaisions to spread the disinformation, has not disappointed us this time. He claims that Katya was <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052827/Katia-Zatuliveter-best-KGB-agent-30-years-claims-colonel.html">an important Russian spy</a>.</span></div></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">David Rose the journalist, <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2007/09/mi6-mi5-intelligence-briefings">freely admitted that he was an agent of MI5 and MI6</a>. It is good that he has declared his involvement in this disinformation of the news MI5 and MI6 want to circulate.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/DQ3A9C3-tFM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/11/katya-zatuliveter-oleg-gordievsky.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-85310508933640589672011-07-13T16:46:00.000-07:002011-07-14T07:02:14.838-07:00Corrupt Cop Detective Chief Superintendent Malcolm McLeod<span class="Apple-style-span">Malcolm McLeod may present himself as an honest policeman, apparently now retired on a good pension, but the way he behaved in my case is thoroughly despicable. McLeod not only lied during his Police interviews following my arrest, but he was quite happy to present false evidence to the Court at my trial. I hope he ducked as he was swearing his oath, to avoid the bolts of lightning!</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">What false evidence did Malcolm McLeod produce? Well, for start he knew quite well that the so-called "ALARM" missile document was not only an obsolete document 8 years before I was arrested, but he deliberately engineered his Police investigation so that none of the 16 engineers listed on the circulation of that document were interviewed or called as witnesses to my trial. That document was presented as the main evidence against me. So, why do such a thing - unless you know that if these 16 people were called to give testimony then that will demolish your case? You dirty rat McLeod - you are just some trumped up loser - John Symonds told me how Special Branch officers are regarded as police who failed to make successful careers elsewhere.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">McLeod also made the claim that I was given money from the KGB - listed elsewhere on my blog. McLeod gave personal testimony (under oath) in Court that he didn't have a clue where that money came from. Yet we had all the bank details that confirmed the dates, and from which banks that money had been withdrawn from. Well, the indications are that the money was issued from MI5 accounts, to implicate me in this sordid stitch-up! Why don't you come clean McLeod and just tell us what you know. The truth and nothing but the truth.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Leaks were made by the Police to the press to damage my defence case, and you know full well that <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/07/news-international-bribe-corrupt-police.html">the Sun</a> and the <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2006/07/sunday-times-mouthpiece-of-mi5-and-mi6.html">Sunday Times</a> were there ready to print the stories you wanted to get out into the public domain. With the recent evidence we have that News International was full of corruption, I can quite understand that there were bribes there waiting for you from Rupert Murdoch, or one of his cronies!</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">You also fabricated that false story about my tourist map, which I saved from my holiday in Oporto - you said it was linked to some invented KGB operation. Have you ever heard of any other KGB operation in Oporto? That story bears no relation to the later Mitrokhin Archive report, which I presume you were referring to, which talks about an operation in Lisbon some 200 miles down the coast, about 2 years later? So were you lying, or was Mitrokhin lying? I don't see why it is up to me to decide who is telling the truth there!</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">It was you, McLeod, who was involved in making that bogus telephone call to my home on the morning of my arrest. So if the name "Viktor" was the key name in your case against me, then why did you not produce the proof that this "Viktor" was in fact "Viktor Oshchenko". You never produced any evidence at my trial who this Viktor was? You heard Stella Rimington tell the Court, under oath, that MI5 had no evidence linking me with Oshchenko, so why did you make the claims you did - without proof! What a corrupt cop you really are! I hope you rot in hell !!!</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/VLgtg82urQs" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com6http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/07/corrupt-cop-detective-chief.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-84926266303705445572011-07-12T12:29:00.000-07:002011-07-13T15:45:11.543-07:00Police, Phone Hacking, the Sun & Sunday Times<span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">We are only just getting accustomed to the shocking news of what happened at the News of The World, and the phone hacking scandal. Hopefully Rupert Murdoch, James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks will be called to answer questions next week and reveal all that they know! </span><span class="Apple-style-span">Now we have the escalation of this saga to include the Sun and Sunday Times, as revealed in <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14112097">the story about Gordon Brown</a>. It seems that there was a sort sickness at News International.</span></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">This new evidence goes to support the accusations I have made against these newspapers: about the <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/07/news-international-bribe-corrupt-police.html">Sun</a>, and the <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2006/07/sunday-times-mouthpiece-of-mi5-and-mi6.html">Sunday Times</a>. Just what was the relationship between these newspapers and the Police back in 1992/3? I guess it was the same as it was when the News of The World was offering bribes to the Police for information about stories.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Very soon after my arrest the Special Branch policeman in charge of my case, Detective Chief Superintendent Malcolm McLeod, had made suggestions to my wife that I had been ordered by the KGB to marry her as a cover for spying activities. This was a complete lie designed to give her a false view of me and our marriage, and clearly the Police cared nothing about my wife's feelings but just wanted her to turn against me and give them what evidence they could extract from her.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Then, following my conviction, we have this same story emerging in the Sun newspaper. It could only have come from the Police, who were the people who had invented this story. I blame Malcolm McLeod for passing this story to the Sun and he probably authorised the media to be given access to my wedding photographs, which had been seized as evidence by the Police searching my home and were in the possession of the Police.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">The Sunday Times article was also clearly something that was leaked to them by a high level source, and aimed at damaging my Defence case. Its publication would also dissuade any potential witnesses from coming forward and becoming implicated in a major Official Secrets Act espionage trial. Again, I blame Malcolm McLeod for being involved in this corrupt association with News International newspapers.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">I would have expected the Police to have acted fairly and left the decision about Justice to the courts. However, the leaking of personal information and false stories about me could only have been done with the deliberate intention of swaying the odds in favour of the Prosecution case. Which is exactly what happened. Not only did the Police act unfairly in what they did, they also acted unfairly in what they did not do.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">As <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14116786">we learned today</a> in the case of the phone hacking investigation, a lot was not done by the Police to identify the victims and the culprits in that case. No doubt the Police did not want to discover who was accepting bribes and just how deeply corrupt practices had developed between the Police and the Press. This lack of activity also went on in the investigation of my case - why did the Police not discover that the "ALARM" missile document became obsolete 8 years before my arrest, which allowed the CPS to present it as a document actually used on ALARM missiles deployed in the Gulf War of 1991 - which could not possibly be true!</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Gaining convictions by avoiding investigating the key evidence is something the Police must be good at. Again, I blame Malcolm McLeod for this decision not to investigate the "ALARM" document - or at least, as head of the investigation he must have known the truth, but that would not have helped him to win in Court. It is easy for me to now understand how such processes work, and the corruption of the Press and the Police is there to be seen by those who really look for it.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/HSwkOMuQ8GI" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/07/police-phone-hacking-sun-sunday-times.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-55947010466490285172011-07-08T15:16:00.000-07:002011-07-13T15:48:00.980-07:00News International bribe corrupt Police for crime evidence<span class="Apple-style-span"><div><span class="Apple-style-span">News of the World may be dead, and in recent days we have become increasingly aware of the public's distaste about the total disregard of the News of The World's staff for individual privacy. News International has shown complete disrespect for the Law and is quite happy to act corruptly and bribe the Police.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div>The Sun newspaper published one of the photographs from my wedding day, on page 9 of its 19 November 1993 edition. How did the Sun get hold of a private photo, which was not in the public domain, and was in fact my personal copyright?</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LkE4eQoAx_c/TheDa4ZaoQI/AAAAAAAAAjA/pvRQrtlWIwU/s400/Conviction%2BSmith%2BSun%2B19%2BNov%2B93.jpg" style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 264px; height: 400px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5627110757261549826" /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span">Sun Newspaper 19 November 1993</span></b></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">We now know that News International journalists would routinely bribe Police officers in order to obtain information about cases being investigated by the Police. It is clear that money must have changed hands at my home shortly after my arrest. Otherwise, how on earth would the Sun get hold of one of my private wedding photos, unless they had paid a corrupt cop to get access to it?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">I have a list of all the Police officers who are were recorded as having access to my home in 1992. I expect one of those Police officers was paid a bribe to give the Sun my wedding photo. Perhaps I should publish this here. However, the details are already available elsewhere on the Internet. My friend John Alexander Symonds (the "Romeo Spy") has explained to me just how this culture of corruption is institutionally endemic within the Police organisation.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">I could have considered this as a minor issue - perhaps - compared to the unfairness of the trial I had just experienced over the previous 7/8 weeks. However, the publication of this photo was instrumental in causing my wife to divorce me, and so I blame News International, and Rupert Murdoch in particular, for running an organisation that has this culture of ... "anything goes!" But then we must also consider that James Murdoch, Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson also have a lot to answer for.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">So, what should I do about the publication of my wedding photo, something which I never agreed to?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">However, this was not the only abuse by the press after I was arrested. Many details about my wife and I were leaked and published to try to undermine my Defence before the case got to trial. For example, one of the worst things to happen involved another Rupert Murdoch newspaper - The Sunday Times. Only a month after my arrest all the Police claims against me were published in <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2006/07/sunday-times-mouthpiece-of-mi5-and-mi6.html">the Sunday Times on 6th September 1992</a>. This was particularly damaging as many of those allegations were later dropped before my trial, but obviously the accuracy of these reports was not important to either the journalists, the newspapers or the Police!</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/tSlE5iWn0To" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com1http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/07/news-international-bribe-corrupt-police.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-7949457606119902072011-06-16T05:03:00.000-07:002011-06-16T05:50:52.835-07:00Joanne Fraill - who is in contempt of Court?<span class="Apple-style-span" >Joanne Fraill has been sentenced to 8 months in prison for <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13792080">contempt of Court</a>, by discussing the case in which she was a juror on FaceBook. How very noble and authoritarian it is for the judge to show no mercy to a woman such as this - what an example it makes to others that they must obey the rules and not flout the Law of the land!</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >But does this case not also demonstrate the traditional British hypocrisy that exists in our Establishment - how a judge will quite happily chastise the weak, while the strong go unpunished?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >I commented in my last post about the case involving <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/06/cps-concealed-evidence-in-mark-kennedy.html">Mark Kennedy</a>, in which the CPS deliberately concealed evidence in order to gain a conviction. What does that case say about the respect shown by the Crown Prosecution Service for the Judicial System?</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >I believe the Kennedy case demonstrated a blatant institutionalized contempt of Court, far more insidious than anything Joanne Fraill may have been guilty of. But will heads role at the CPS over the Kennedy case? Will anybody go to prison for that contempt of Court? I doubt it very much, because these guys probably went to the same public school, or meet in the same Lodge with their trousers leg rolled up. It is another world when you are on that side of the fence!</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >I have often complained that evidence was falsified at my own trial - I call that perverting the course of Justice, but the CPS were again responsible for that abuse. I accuse the CPS of contempt of Court for deliberately placing a false case before the jury, knowing that this would lead to my conviction. Luckily I have the ability to analysis what they did and have discovered the false evidence by my own efforts. To the discredit of the CPS - they have never acknowledged that they did anything wrong. Nobody will face charges for lying in Court or concealing evidence in my case. The CPS's unprofessional acts are ignored, and the evidence brushed under the carpet.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >The CPS is further implicated in presenting false evidence to the jury in the trial of Daniel James. In trying to help Daniel <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2008/07/corporal-daniel-james-faces-engineered.html">I published parts of important witness statements</a>, from witnesses that the Prosecution would not be calling because they would assist the Defence case. Shortly after this act I was warned that I was in contempt of Court, and that both I and Daniel could be prosecuted. Apparently my publication of these witness statements was put to the judge in the case. However, I stood firm and decided not to remove the post from my blog, and it is still there to this day.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >Why do you think I was not prosecuted for contempt of Court? I can only conclude that raising this issue would have brought the whole basis for the case against Daniel into the open. I would certainly have used in my Defence that Daniel was being unfairly tried, and this would have raised serious doubts about the evidence against him. Also, the way Daniel was being tried in a Civilian Court, when he had requested a Court Martial.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >Just as I always thought, "Justice" is manipulated to support those with the power in our country. The small guy only wins when he has the evidence to embarrass the wig wearing class of judges and barristers.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/p3If9Qmj01w" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/06/joanne-fraill-who-is-in-contempt-of.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-83636372291880106712011-06-08T14:47:00.000-07:002011-06-08T16:24:18.286-07:00CPS concealed evidence in Mark Kennedy Case<span class="Apple-style-span">The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) concealed evidence in the Mark Kennedy case, involving the plan to shut down the <span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station in Nottingham in 2009. This was discussed on the BBC2 Newsnight programme tonight and on the </span></span><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13699911" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); line-height: 18px; ">BBC website today</a><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">. Mark Kennedy was in fact an undercover police agent pretending to act as an environmental campaigner.</span></span></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); line-height: 18px; "><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">It seems unbelievable that the CPS would behave in such a way by concealing evidence, as this is tantamount to perverting the course of Justice. But it is clear that the CPS was planning to convict the environmental activists involved, despite knowing that their organisation (the CPS) was withholding key evidence, as explained in the </span><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jun/07/mark-kennedy-police-spy-secret-tapes?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487" style="line-height: 18px; ">Guardian newspaper</a> - many thanks to Paul Lewis and Rob Evans!!<span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;"> The Police knew all about the plans concerning the power station, because they had a recording of the meeting at the Iona Primary School where the campaigners met on Easter Monday 2009.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; "><br /></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">This may be big news to those naive enough to believe that the CPS is acting in the interests of Justice. But to people like myself this is simply confirmation that the CPS exists to convict those targeted by Government agencies as undesirable.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; "><br /></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">In August 1992, just days following my arrest for espionage, it was brought to the attention of the CPS that the key document in my case had been made obsolete in 1984. I only discovered this in 2007, despite efforts to prevent this information becoming known to myself and my Member of Parliament Andrew Mackinlay. The CPS had therefore concealed this evidence for many years, and they conspired to present an alternative story to the jury at my trial in October 1993, when it was claimed that that the document had in fact been used on British ALARM missiles deployed in the Gulf War of 1991.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">This evidence that an obsolete document from 1984 was used to produce ALARM missiles in the early 1990s is plainly false, but the CPS cleverly used Professor Meirion Francis Lewis, an MoD scientist from Malvern, to claim that the document had been used on ALARM missiles during that war. He explained to the jury that the missile was vital to protecting the lives of British servicemen, and that the obsolete 1984 document would have enabled Iraqis to jam the missile and prevent it from working.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; "><br /></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">Perhaps many people will say: "that is OK, it doesn't matter as long as the guilty are convicted". However, this was the main evidence used at my trial to identify that I had handled sensitive material, and so it was crucial to my Defence that I had not dealt with military secrets at the time of my arrest. If a real expert had been called to give evidence at my trial, then it would have been made clear to the jury that the document could not have been used on ALARM missiles in the 1991 Gulf War.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; "><br /></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">The CPS chose to call a non-expert at my trial - Professor Lewis - and they used him to make false assertions about that document. I would call this perverting the course of Justice, and I would say that Professor Lewis knowingly committed perjury when he made his claims in Court. Will anybody listen to this? Is the CPS above the Law? Perhaps all those who know the truth at the CPS are merely liars and conspirators.</span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; "><br /></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;">All I</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px;"> know is that the CPS acted unprofessionally in my case, and this </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; ">Mark</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; "> </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; ">Kennedy </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 18px; ">case shows they also acted unprofessionally in that case as well. How many cases does it take to prove that the CPS in unprofessional?</span></span></span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/ZzjYe8J7TAg" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/06/cps-concealed-evidence-in-mark-kennedy.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-30330159356669170012011-04-12T16:10:00.000-07:002011-05-13T17:42:17.920-07:00Professor Christopher Andrew squawks more rubbish<span class="Apple-style-span">Professor Christopher Andrew, otherwise know as <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2007/02/open-letter-to-professor-christopher.html">"The Cambridge Parrot"</a>, has just made another podcast on behalf of MI5 to be disseminated as serious comment via <a href="http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/podcasts/mi5-file-release-apr-2011.htm">The National Archives website</a>.</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">The parrot brags in this podcast about his role as being the official historian for MI5 - what a pretty boy he is. However, the deception of Christopher Andrew's work is that he conveniently removed all references from his <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2009/10/christopher-andrew-and-mi5-defence-of.html">"official" MI5 history</a> in relation to my case on the issue of <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2008/07/challenging-professor-christopher.html">Portugal and Oporto</a>, which proved to be the most important evidence at my trial in 1993. The conclusion to be drawn is that <a href="http://parellic.blogspot.com/2009/03/dame-stella-rimington-confronted-about.html">Dame Stella Rimington</a> fabricated that evidence in order to secure my conviction, and now the parrot has removed it from the archives on the orders of his MI5 handlers. I have always found that protection against embarrassment is a key <i>modus operandi</i> of MI5's approach, and the parrot proves again what a useful servant he is in their cause.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Well, Prof Andrew can squawk all he likes about his references to KV file numbers, because we now know that all he is doing is putting out the version of propaganda that MI5 and MI6 are keen to get into the public domain. This is their version of the "jigsaw" that they so often speak about.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">Yet again, Andrew repeats the fictitious story about Roger Hollis having been a Soviet agent - but why not acknowledge the testimony of John Alexander Symonds, who has clearly stated in his own writings that the real Soviet mole within MI5 around that time was its other Director General, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Smith_(diplomat)">Sir Howard Smith</a>. It was not surprising that Smith was removed from office when John Symonds returned to the UK from Moscow. Who pulled the strings then I wonder? James Callaghan was mentioned <a href="http://www.romeospy.co.uk/Pages/sunny_jim.htm">at the time</a>.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">I guess we will never hear the real story of MI5, until we are all dead in a couple of hundred years time. The truth is really too uncomfortable for those at Thames House, and that other lot just up the river in Vauxhall.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/Cfj7cQ0EMD4" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com2http://parellic.blogspot.com/2011/04/professor-christopher-andrew-squawks.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-27152525266831483202010-08-29T13:59:00.000-07:002011-05-13T17:40:37.842-07:00Romeo spy John Alexander Symonds publishes his autobiography<span class="Apple-style-span">Romeo Spy for the KGB, John Alexander Symonds, has finally published his memoires, to set the story straight about his exploits around the globe. The autobiographical book of John's life is now available as a free download on the </span><span class="Apple-style-span"><a href="http://www.romeospy.co.uk">Home Page</a></span><span class="Apple-style-span"> of his website.</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">This is not the only news about John this past week. The movie company Seven Arts Pictures has also announced that a film titled </span><a href="http://7artspictures.com/films/view/34/romeo-spy"><i><span class="Apple-style-span">Romeo Spy</span></i></a><span class="Apple-style-span"> is in production to tell John's true life story.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">The book has also been published on several other websites, such as <a href="http://cryptome.org/0002/romeo-spy.doc">Cryptome</a>, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/36915873/romeo-spy">Scribd</a> and <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/parellic/romeo-spy-kgb">slideshare</a>.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px;"><br /></span></span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/4n-KHwq7cxE" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2010/08/romeo-spy-john-alexander-symonds.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-60068528923118003462010-06-07T14:26:00.000-07:002010-06-07T14:43:37.606-07:00MI6, Astra, Gerald Reaveley James & the war in Iraq<p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;">MI6 and the Iraq War is a big topic. The following is a statement from </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; ">Gerald Reaveley James, who, as the Chairman of Astra, was subjected to the usual pressures from MI6 and the Government's henchmen. Much of the real politics in the UK takes place behind closed doors, and it is not surprising that companies and individuals are sacrificed to the holy cow of some politician's dreams of power. Let us hope that revelations such as the following make those with doubts wake up to what is happening around us.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana; "><i>My experiences, the Scott Inquiry, the British Legal System</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>By Gerald Reaveley James </i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>I am reminded of the very appropriate quote from Edmund Burke (1729-97) “It is necessary only for the good man to do nothing for evil to triumph.”</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>I am most grateful to Dr Badsha for inviting me and honoured to make this address at this Conference of the Environmental Law Centre.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The Astra case and my case reflect much that has been to the fore in recent years in not only scandals around arms companies like Astra, Matrix Churchill, Ordtec, Forgemasters, Walter Somers, Ferranti and other companies like Polly Peck, BCCI and Maxwell but also in the Scott Inquiry, the BSE Inquiry and the Lloyds of London affair and other scandals. The underlying problem is secret unaccountable government which bypasses Parliament and how the law is administered in the UK, gives aid and succour to such a state of affairs. The most common device is the concealment of evidence and manipulation of cases. There is a tendency when challenged for those in authority to talk of conspiracy theories. My experience is that those who do so are usually part of the conspiracy.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>My company Astra gave rise to much of the circumstances which created the Scott Inquiry, the Supergun revelations (we reported it first), the Aitken affair, the murder of Gerald Bull in Brussels in March 1990 and much else.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Background note:</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>My name is Gerald Reaveley James. Until March 1990 and between 1980 and 1990 I was chairman of Astra Holdings PLC (“Astra”) which became a leading ammunition and weapons manufacturer. By the late 1980’s Astra had factories in the United States (9), Canada (2), Belgium (5), United Kingdom (5) and administrative headquarters in Washington Dc, Brussels and London and employed 4,000 personnel. The story of Astra is too long to recount here but a summary is contained in my book, “In the Public Interest” published by Little Brown UK hardback 1995, Warner paperback 1996, London. Astra became involved in covert weapons and ammunitions operations organised by MI5 and MI6 and the CIA, the MOD, DOD, FCO and the State Department and the DTI. To such an extent was Astra involved with its pricipal subsidiaries, Walters, Accudyne, Kilgore USA PRB Belgium, BMARC UK; in the covert trade manipulations of Foreign Policy. In 1989/90, following a reappraisal of Foreign Policy in the light of the demise of the Cold War and changing circumstances in the Middle East, where it became apparent the US, UK and EEC had transferred Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons technology as well as conventional weapons to countries like Iran and Iraq, and the discovery Pakistan had the atomic bomb, the whole covert network was reorganised. This involved the collapsing of companies like Astra, Ferranti/ISC, Polly Peck, BCCI, Maxwell Group etc and the prosecution of lesser fry Companies and their directors – companies like Matrix Churchill, BNJ, Ordtec, Euromac, SRC, Forgemasters, Walter Somers are examples. The directors of Astra were to a large extent ignorant of the full range of covert activities carried out in their name but aware of some of these activities and the likely destination of their goods. As however all operations were sanctioned by the DTI, MOD, FCO, and in the US by the DOD and the State Department and in Belgium by the Belgian Government, not too many questions were raised initially. However, in late 1988 and 1989 it became clear to me as Chairmen that the clandestine operations far exceeded anything remotely sanctioned by the full Board and I set out to investigate in depth. I became aware that certain plants were used to secretly store and ship goods; that monies were being transferred to other operations without book records or board approval in secret commission payments; that our paper work and parallel bank accounts were being used to process arms shipments from major UK defence companies like British Aerospace, Royal Ordnance, GEC Marconi, Thorn EMI etc. A leading British Defence Journalist wrote a report which was largely kept secret which indicated £100m was stolen from the Export Credit Guarantee Department (“ECGD”) in a fictitious subcontract for propellant which BMARC, an Astra subsidiary, had secretly obtained in 1998 from Royal Ordnance.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>I also became concerned about payments to and business with MI6/CIA front company Allivane which had occurred between 1983 and 1988 via Astra. Is also became clear that all our main operations were involved in covert operations in the USA Belgium and the UK, and that Astra, when it acquired these companies, had inherited a hard core of MI6, MI5, DIA agents who operated behind the back of the original directors and who treated them as “useful idiots”. All our main companies were involved with Space Research Corporation (“SRC”) and the late Dr Gerald Bull who was behind the Supergun and other secret projects which Astra companies were also involved in. In 1989 I realised we had a hugely dangerous individual on our main Board and the BMARC Board who was an MI6 agent. This individual, Stepahnus Adolphus Kock had high level political connections to Thatcher, Hesletine, Younger, Hanley, etc as well as MI5 and MI6 connections. It is now clear to me that he was involved in the murder of Dr Gerald Bull in Brussels on 22</i></span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>nd</i></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i> march 1990 and Jonathan Moyle in Santiago, Chile on 31</i></span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>st</i></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i> March 1990. BMARC was the only company outside the Atomic Weapons research Establishment and Government Arms depots with the capability to store nuclear bombs like Redbeard and WE177.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>By early 1990 my probing had become a major problem and a plot was hatched to remove me as Chairman shortly before the Supergun and other revelations and Bull’s murder. A new dummy board ld in reality by Kock with two MI6/MI5 stooges ran the company into the ground over the next two years. In order to explain away the destruction of the company with a £350m order book and a market capitalisation of £120m desperate attempts were made to find evidence of malpractice by the original directors. Gumbley, my Managing Director, who had been with Bull until an hour before he was shot had discussed with Bull suing UK Government and senior civil servants using Bull’s extensive knowledge of high level corruption and illegal operations. It had been agreed I would return with Gumbley to agree with lawyers how to proceed a week later. I had discussed such matters with Bull some six months previous but no further action had been taken. Gumbley was immediately framed up for corrupting an MOD official and jailed for 9 months and after desperately trying to find something on me and failing, Kock and MI6/MI5 decided to institute through Peter Lilley and the DTI a DTI Inquiry. Lilley was Secretary of state at the DTI at the time.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The DTI Inquiry lasted three years and cost £2.5m plus (as much as the Scott Inquiry). The announcement of the Inquiry and the misleading press statements issued by the DTI and Government ensured the downfall of Astra. Crooks and MI5, MI6, agents or informers were put in chare of Astra – Kock, Roy Barber FCA and Tony McCann. Barber and McCann whose managerial and industrial competence and experience were negligible paid themselves £330,000 and £280,000 pa respectively. Barber took £100,000 in the first month. Barber’s annual payment was more than I received in salary and expenses as Chairman over ten years while I built the company. PRB was sold off immediately for £3m to avoid embarrassing revelations. MI5, MI6 and MOD police and Customs launched 17 raids on Astra premises in order to steal any sales and other documentation incriminating Government. No new orders were obtained in spite of the Gulf War and the company ran on the £350m order book we had left for two years, before it was put into receivership on 2</i></span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>nd</i></span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i> February 1992 on the eve of me giving evidence to the House of Commons Trade and Industry Select Committee re Supergun, Project Babylon and arms to Iraq (and Iran etc). Press coverage was hue and adverse. This facilitated, as clearly city interests like Banks and Astra’s main shareholders 3i, Prudential and Clerical and medical cooperated with Government for their own interest and purposes against the interests of smaller shareholders ( a parallel with Lloyds techniques). Kock had a cover as a consultant in Midland Bank’s secret arms department, Midland and Industrial Trade Services (”MITS”). This was staffed by ex service officers, MI5, MI6, agents and intelligence affiliated bankers. Midland with the Bank of Boston were Astra’s main bankers and dominated by MI6 CIA agents. Kock was also said to be head of Group 13, the Government’s assassination and dirty tricks squad according to Richard John Rainey Unwin, a close associate of Knock himself who was a contract MI6 agent and Consultant to Astra. Kock and Unwin, with Martin Laing Construction, negotiated the £2bn Malaysian defence deal before George Younger, the Defence Secretary even knew of it.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The MOD police arrested several of my colleagues, framed Grumbley up. I was subjected to harassment, burglaries; I was arrested by Customs, investigated by the Inland Revenue, subjected to surveillance, threats, bugging, telephone tapping (all documented), a DTI Inquiry which lasted 3 years and a DTI prosecution which lasted 4 years. In addition I had to give copious evidence to the Scott Inquiry over 4 years, 2 DTI Select Committees, Foreign Affairs Select Committee, Defence Select Committee, Public Accounts Select Committee, Public Services Select committee, Police (SOI), a huge law suit in the United States (Dooley case). My family suffered considerably, my two eldest sons army careers suffered, my youngest son’s education because of adverse publicity, my brother was killed in an accident never satisfactory explained which could have been intended for me. </i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>In the course of my own experiences I took considerable note and interest in parallel cases like Matrix Churchill, Ordtec, Euromac, Atlantic Commercial, BNJ, SRC, Forgemasters, Walter Somers, Polly Peck, Foxley Ferranti/ISC, BCCI, Maxwell etc. All these cases and others and the Astra case involved the gross abuse of power by Government and its agencies and servants, concealment of key evidence, intimidation, threats, false and selective prosecutions, manipulation of evidence, perversion of the course of justice. It has also been clearly demonstrated that there is no separation of powers within the United Kingdom. Key legal appointments like Lord Chancellor and attorney General, Solicitor General are wholly political. It has also been clearly demonstrated that Parliament has no control of knowledge of events and that a vast apparatus of permanent unelected Government exists. This permanent Government consists of senior civil servants, intelligence and security officers, key figures in certain city and financial institutions (including Lloyds of London), key industrialists and directors of major monopolistic companies, senior politicians. The Lord Chancellors Office which is responsible for the appointment of Judges, Clerks of the House of Commons select Committees and approval of Chairmen of such committees and the approval of the Queen’s Counsel, holds a total control of the legal administrative framework and has strong connections to the security and intelligence services. The last Clerk to the Crown in Chancery was Sir Thomas Legg, KCB QC who had strong links to the intelligence and security establishment and who was responsible for allocating Judges to controversial trials of a political nature where the “national interest” and “national security” (those much abused phrases) were involved, ie the Ponting Case. Legg’s successor will have a similar role. Sir Thomas was duly wheeled out to keep the lid on the Sandline Inquiry re the strange events surrounding the FCO, Sierra Leone and real foreign policy as opposed to the sham variety discussed at Westminster. He has been wheeled out again to keep the lid on an inquiry regarding the corruption in the hugely expensive building of new MP’s offices opposite Big Ben. The companies involved in this case are Alvis, formerly United Scientific Holdings and its Germany partner in the installation of a £35m contract for copper cladding. United Scientific Holdings is the company where ex Chief of defence Procurement and ex Lord Mayor Sir Peter, now Lord Levene was Managing director (later a Director of N.M. Rothschild) was Chairman. An American competitor alleges irregularities and corruption as it offered to do the work for a much lower price.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The real framework which secretly controls our lives is little understood or studies even by those who work within its musty and murky depths. It has only recently emerged that Appeal Court Judges are secretly briefed making appearances before such luminaries a sham and a joke. The public can thank Mr Geoffrey Scriven for these revelations. Lloyds names can hardly have realised that legislation was secretly framed to prevent wrong doers being sued. (Times Magazine Article 21/2/00).</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The other area which is little understood is the Crown. To many the Crown represents the Royal family but we now have a Constitutional Monarchy. The Crown in its constitutional sense is the last home of secret government. Much is done in the name of the Crown which is without the permission or knowledge of the Monarch. Token gestures are made by sending her despatch boxes of “selected” information. The Crown is represented by the Monarch but does not represent the on secret and major issues. The armed forces (the last bastion of institutional integrity) swear their allegiance to the Monarch not to Parliament as do Judges and the Intelligence and security services – the latter are totally unaccountable as is the Lord Chancellors’ office which controls Courts and Judges. The Lord Chancellor is unelected as is the Attorney General who although chosen from the ranks of MPs is not elected, like the Solicitor General. The Attorney General holds sway over the Crown Prosecution service, serious Fraud Office, HM Customs (as revealed by the Scott Inquiry) and the Police in respect of sanctioning cases. The Law Officers, the Attorney General and the Solicitor General are the Chief Legal Advisors (assisted by the Solicitor General) has overall responsibility for the work of the Law Officer’s Departments:</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>ie The Treasury Solicitors Department </i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i> Crown Prosecution Service</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i> Serious Fraud Office</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i> Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>All the duties of the above departments (and HM Customs) are ultimately supervised by the Attorney General.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland is also responsible to the Attorney General for the performance of his functions. There are also additional responsibilities with regard to civil and criminal law.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The other area which is key to overall secret control outside Parliament is the Privy Council. It is important to note that all main members of the Cabinet become members of the Privy Council as do leaders and sometimes the deputy leaders of the opposition parties.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The Privy Council oath which all members take means they cannot freely discuss any matter they are informed of or told of “Under Privy Council terms”. This means that the Cabinet and opposition leaders cannot discuss freely in Parliament or elsewhere any matter told to them on “Privy Council terms”. This means in practice that the key MPs cannot discharge their democratic duties. It is in effect a gagging system like Public Interest Immunity Certificates dispensed by Judges on application of Government and its agencies. All senior Judges and Appeal Judges are Privy Councillors as is the Lord Chancellor, The Attorney and Solicitor General and other invited and key persons. This secret unelected body has a wide range of powers. On the surface other permanent secretaries, sometimes the Cabinet Secretary and certain members of the established aristocracy are Privy Councillors. The appointment is for life and Jonathon Aitken is one of the few members to resign.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>It should also be remembered Aitken was a Chairman of the Pinay Circle comprised of senior intelligence officers and world leaders who hold secret meeting around the world.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>It is widely and erroneously assumed the Cabinet is the Executive of the elected Government whereas in our unwritten ill defined constitution it is in reality the executive arm of the Privy Council.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The Privy Council is responsible for the arrangements leading to the making of Royal Proclamations and Orders in Council for certain formalities connected with Ministerial Changes: for considering application for the grant or amendment of Royal Charters, for the security and approval of by laws and statutes of Chartered Institutions, of the governing instruments of universities and colleges, for the appointment of High Sheriffs and many Crown and Privy Council Nominees for governing bodies.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Under the relevant Acts, the office of the Privy Council is responsible for the approval of certain regulations and rules made by the governing bodies of the medical and certain allied professions.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The President of the Council has responsibility for the working of the Privy Council. A leader of the House of Commons he or she is responsible for supervising the Government’s legislative programme. He or she allegedly upholds the right and privileges of the House as a whole and in its capacity it falls to him or her to move motions relating to the procedure of the House. In January 1994 the Privy Council assumed responsibility for the newly formed Central Drugs Coordination Unit. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is the highest Court of Appeal for the Commonwealth except the United Kingdom and those countries which had abolished appeals to it. It still can confirm death sentences in certain territories and in the UK hears ecclesiastical cases and appeals against disciplinary decisions by disciplinary bodies of the medical professions and certain allied bodies. Its more secret and sinister workings are little known and in theory it is the advisory body to the monarch. It appears that the bulk of elected politicians do not penetrate its inner recesses yet can be influenced by it.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The Privy Council allied with the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) and the Cabinet and Cabinet Intelligence Unit which is the real control over the security and intelligence services are part of the secret permanent unaccountable Government.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>We have seen from the arms to Iran, Iraq affairs, the Sandline affair and other scandals that politicians and Parliament have little or no control and are more like players in a pantomime put on for the general public and gullible public.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>The roots of this sinister power are rooted in history, particularly that of the usurping Tudors. The Privy Council and secret services have developed since then and it is wrong to regard MI5 and MI6 as the sole such bodies. As Douglas Hurd told a Commons Select Committee regarding nuclear proliferation they are but two tributaries of the main stream of intelligence. The communication and eavesdropping unit GCHQ works extensively with the intelligence and security services and with those of other countries including the intelligence services and National Security Agency of USA and with the Services of Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Each regularly circumvents domestic laws for the benefit of the others under programmes like “echelon” and agreements between UK and USA. Politicians and civil servants and other leading figures who get out of line can be surveyed or bugged and then threatened, blackmailed, framed up or worse.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Secrecy breeds corruption, secrecy is power, information is power particularly confidential information. There is no accountability and the calibre of MP deteriorates with each Parliament. The young politician with no experience outside is naïve and powerless and many now have a blind loyalty to their party. Ironically the hereditary peers of the House of Lords provided one of the last vestiges of honesty and independence now largely destroyed by self-important and self-deluding figures like Blair and Baroness Jay.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>This the background against which decisions affairs like Lloyds of London have been handled and decided.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Secrecy has breed corruption and lack of accountability. Judicial Inquiries are cosmetic and carried out by the Judiciary who are key tools of the “cover up” and the status quo. (ie the Scott Inquiry). London is a key world money laundering centre (£500 billion per annum). Damage to Lloyds’ credibility will damage London and its position as a money or financial centre.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Much of the Uk’s traditional industry is gone. To deal with Lloyds from the point of view of justice, will rock the boat and damage the so called national interest. Privileged persons in politics and the judiciary etc have been protected and the rest do not matter. The policy is to protect Lloyds and cover up. The same arrogant and self serving attitude was evident in the arms trade and the related drugs trade. Those on the inside are only interested in concealment, cover up, and their own on going benefits protected by secrecy and privilege. Justice does not count. The scandals involving political parties, large companies, the intelligence and security services, and corruption in Germany (Kohl), France (Mitterand/Dumas,etc) Italy (Craxi) are pale shadows of what has gone on in the UK. We have what the late Roberto Clavi of Banco Amnrosiano in Italy as described “potere occulto” –secret power.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Ironically the main threat to this secret power is the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) Article 6 which overturns Uk legal decisions regularly and has already caused the sacking of deputy Judges, and Magistrates in Scotland while threatening Scottish Judges. Scotland under devolution adopted ECHR in 1999 and England did so in October 2000, although the Lord Chief Justice (Bingham) already recommended as a result of the Kebbilen case that the ECHR should be recognised in England before this.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>It is significant that the Home Secretary Shaw is proposing the abolition of juries and magistrates in many and perhaps eventually all cases. This will put further power in the hands of secret and unaccountable Government and corrupt Judges. The ramifications are extremely sinister and serious. Already the rules of evidence have been perverted in favour of secret an unaccountable Government who routinely conceal evidence and pervert the course of justice.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>It has never been more vital for people to challenge the views of politicians and opinion formers. We live in an age where much if not most of the media is controlled. The legal mechanism and Judges and the court system need to be beyond reproach. Sadly they are not and the chronicle of abuse and manipulation of cases is appalling. Judges are not independent in most government related cases and are no different to salaried and pensioned civil servants. The independence of the Judiciary is an allusion fostered by the Judiciary. Too often a Judicial Inquiry is a system for cover up and concealment. Too often the courts are influenced by political considerations as in the Scott Inquiry and the recent Lloyds of London case. Perhaps with pressure this can be changed.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>We do not want a society dominated by lawyers, accountants and monopoly commercial Interests with the courts administered by Judges who follow directions.</i></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><i>Thank you very much.</i></span></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/wgSPTLKHcUo" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2010/06/mi6-astra-gerald-reaveley-james-war-in.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-83981190149969795202010-05-12T04:04:00.000-07:002012-02-28T18:16:36.470-08:00Russian Spy case entry removed from Chambers website<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">This morning I note that the entry on 187 Fleet Street Chambers website about my case has been removed. This was the reference that was related to Gary Summers involvement with my case while he was a barrister at that Chambers.</span><br /><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">However, Summers did not do any real work on my case while he was at these chambers, and my chance of an appeal failed because I was left without legal help to promote the new evidence I had found. Instead we have the false statements in my official trial records standing as "accurate", despite the fact that I have exposed the evidence of Professor Meirion Francis Lewis as false.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/dZznhAT2AR4" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2010/05/russian-spy-case-entry-removed-from.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-76998288790397460882010-05-11T06:52:00.000-07:002010-05-11T06:57:18.227-07:00187 Fleet Street Chambers Gary Summers case continued<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;">Andrew Trollope QC Chambers has still not responded to my e-mail about why my case appears on the Home Page of their website as one of their "Notable Cases". Clearly the Clerks at <a href="http://www.187fleetstreet.com/index.php">187 Fleet Street</a> have ignored my approach to them. Perhaps Gary Summers has advised them to ignore me?</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:verdana;">The logical next step is to write to individual barristers in the Chambers, and so I have just posted e-mails to the following lawyers: Jonathan Davies, Brian Reece, Irshad Sheikh, James Lachkovic, Terence Woods, Avirup Chaudhuri, Nicholas Barraclough, Warwick Aleeson, Dafna Spiro, Adam Butler, Pauline Thompson, Leon Kazakos, Emma Kurzner, James Rouse.</span></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/mkSxj39LV3s" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2010/05/187-fleet-street-chambers-gary-summers.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-31943028528187142502010-05-10T05:31:00.000-07:002012-02-28T18:13:12.468-08:00Gary Summers and my case at 187 Fleet Street<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Gary Summers did work on my case, although he spent hardly any time on it during his period in the Andrew Trollope QC Chambers at 187 Fleet Street. This is why I find it so puzzling that I appear as one of their "Notable Cases" on the </span><a href="http://www.187fleetstreet.com/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Home Page</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"> of Trollope's website.</span><br /><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">In my opinion this is a false claim. I have received no reply to the e-mail I sent to both 187 Fleet Street and Gary Summers (at 23 Essex Street Chambers). Perhaps they are not interested to reply, but ignoring my complaint is no way to resolve such an important matter.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Here is my e-mail to them:</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b>To:</b> chambers@187fleetstreet.com</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b>cc:</b> Gary Summers <clerks@23es.com></clerks@23es.com></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b>From:</b> Michael John Smith</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b>Date:</b> 6 May 2010</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b>Subject:</b> I am not one of your "Notable Cases"</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>Dear Sirs,</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i><br /></i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>I only noticed today that you make claims on your website that my case of R -v- Michael John Smith was one of your "Notable Cases".</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i><br /></i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>I beg to differ, because your then Junior Barrister Gary Summers let me down badly in supporting my submission to the CCRC, a submission which I had prepared myself. In fact I later discovered evidence that proved that the key exhibit in my case, a document dated January 1982, was made obsolete in 1984 (over 8 years before my arrest) and therefore could not have been used on ALARM missiles deployed in the 1991 Gulf War.</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i><br /></i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>Gary Summers has a lot to answer for in failing to uncover this evidence prior to my trial, and then telling me that he could do nothing to make this exhibit a ground of Appeal in 1995. I now suspect that Gary Summers knew all along that the document was obsolete, but the Prosecution case would have collapsed had it been raised by my defence at my trial.</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i><br /></i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>I am told that barristers and QCs quite regularly let the Prosecution win cases like this, particularly when the MoD and MI5 stand to have egg on their faces for producing false evidence at an Old Bailey trial.</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i><br /></i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>Shame on all you lawyers there for letting your standards sink to the corrupt and unethical methods employed to convict me. I could and will say a lot more, but will start by publicising this on the </i></span><a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.legal/browse_thread/thread/c00f8f24a35e394b#"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>Internet</i></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>.</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i><br /></i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>Yours sincerely,</i></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><i>Michael John Smith</i></span></div></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/A8JHDwOUJ1Q" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2010/05/gary-summers-ticking-time-bomb-at-187.htmltag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-91498423736242663392010-05-08T12:29:00.000-07:002012-02-28T18:02:24.216-08:00Gary Summers - my Defence barrister<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_gErIwxb8eV8/S-W998zI4RI/AAAAAAAAAgI/ZWBw3t47lio/s1600/Gary+Summers.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5468986194501624082" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_gErIwxb8eV8/S-W998zI4RI/AAAAAAAAAgI/ZWBw3t47lio/s400/Gary+Summers.jpg" style="cursor: hand; cursor: pointer; height: 75px; width: 73px;" /></a></div><div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b>Gary Summers</b></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><b><br /></b></span></div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_gErIwxb8eV8/S-W998zI4RI/AAAAAAAAAgI/ZWBw3t47lio/s1600/Gary+Summers.jpg"></a><br /><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Gary Summers was my Junior Barrister and he was associated with my Official Secrets Act case over about a 14 year period between 1992 and 2006.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"> I was arrested in August 1992 and accused of trying to sell military information to "Russians". At the time I did not have the security clearance to have access to "secrets", and so the Prosecution had to present a case that was deliberately designed to exaggerate the value of the stuff I worked with. I still do not know everything that happened behind the scenes, but I was "set up" in a sting operation in which it was claimed I had known a man named Viktor. No surname was given - this name Viktor was mentioned in a phone call made to my home on the morning of my arrest - and it was later stated in Court that this "Viktor" was actually a Russian named Viktor Oshchenko, who was a Russian intelligence officer in London in the 1970s. I did know a Spaniard named Viktor at the time of my arrest, but that was pushed out of the case as irrelevant. Even Stella Rimington admitted in Court that MI5 had no evidence that I had ever met Oshchenko, but the Prosecution case was that I had known him and been recruited to the KGB by him.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">This is where the role of Gary Summers becomes important, because two of the key aspects in my case could have been proven and helped me, but Gary Summers did not give these points the attention they deserved. Firstly, it was stated that I had gone to Oporto on a KGB training mission, and the evidence was that I had at my home a tourist map I had kept from a holiday in 1977 - the map was given to me by a camp site attendant, and it was marked to show bus stops and a restaurant used by me and the friend I was travelling with. Later, in 1999, Christopher Andrew mentioned in the book <i>The Mitrokhin Archive</i> that I had gone to Lisbon on a KGB training mission, <b>not</b> Oporto. Then, when the official MI5 history was published by Christopher Andrew in 2009, he left all mention of my visit to Portugal out of his book, because the real fact was that this evidence had been misrepresented in Court simply to gain my conviction.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Because of this claim about Oporto the Prosecution was allowed to call an anonymous witness - not connected in any way with me - he said he was sent on a KGB training mission to Lisbon in 1979 by a man named Viktor, and the suggestion was made to the jury that I must have been doing something similar.</span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">You would have thought that Stella Rimington - a key witness at my trial - would have been keen to boast about her role in gaining my conviction. It is likely that she was promoted to Director of MI5 on the basis that she had been&nbsp;successful&nbsp;in prosecuting a major espionage case - the biggest in her time running the counter-espionage section of MI5. Well, I guess that Rimington must be ashamed of the false evidence she was&nbsp;responsible&nbsp;for introducing into my trial, because there is not one reference to me or my case in her autobiography <i>Open Secret</i>.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">The second main issue raised at my trial was a document dated January 1982, which Professor Meirion Francis Lewis (an MoD scientist) then claimed was linked with ALARM missiles used in the 1991 Gulf War. I later learned, in 2007, that this document was in fact made obsolete in 1984 (8 years before my arrest) and there was no chance it could have been used on any ALARM missiles, but this matter was never resolved because nobody was willing to admit the truth.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">After my conviction in 1993, largely because I had no access to experts who knew the truth, I was sentenced to 25 years in prison. At my appeal in 1995 I wanted Gary Summers to make a main ground of appeal on the point that the document had not been used on ALARM missiles (although at that time it was only a gut-feeling I had), but he told me that there was no expert who could help us. The issue about Portugal was likewise brushed aside as a fair matter to have been raised by the Prosecution at my trial. The only gain I won at my appeal was a reduction in sentence from 25 to 20 years.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Later, in 1998, I made an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, and in 2003 I asked Gary Summers to help me make a further submission with the evidence I had discovered myself (which should have been used at my appeal in 1995). Gary made a few suggestions, but did very little himself to improve my submission. It wasn't until 2008, after a period of 10 years, that the CCRC finally rejected my application that my trial had been unfair.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">It was only after a lot of thinking through what has happened to me, and the advice given to me by an ex-policeman, </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><a href="http://www.romeospy.co.uk/">John Alexander Symonds</a></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">, that I have come to realise that my Defence lawyers did far less than they should have done to challenge all the false evidence presented by the CPS, which was responsible for my conviction. Mr Symonds has told me how it was common practice during his time in the Police that the lawyers would work with the Police to make sure they got their convictions.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Towards the end of my relationship with Gary Summers I was pushing harder to get to the truth, and it was at this point that he suddenly dropped me and told me that he didn't want to be involved any more in my case. Perhaps he realised that I was getting too close to the truth and might uncover evidence that was undeniable, which I have in effect done. But this experience has taught me not to trust the majority of lawyers in the UK.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">As far as Gary Summers is concerned, he appears to have moved around quite a lot in the time I have known him. In 1992, when I first came into contact with him, he was working in the Chambers of Rock Tansey QC (then at 3 Grays Inn Square). He continued in Rock Tansey's Chambers when he handled my appeal in 1995</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">When I later tried to contact Summers in 1997, I discovered that he had left the Bar and become a solicitor, and was working at </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><a href="http://www.magrath.co.uk/">Magrath &amp; Co</a></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">. In 2003, when I next contacted Summers to help me with my CCRC submission, I found he had gone back to being a barrister and was working in the </span><a href="http://www.187fleetstreet.com/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">Andrew Trollope QC Chambers</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"> at 187 Fleet Street.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">I later tried to contact Summers and found he had moved to </span><a href="http://www.7br.co.uk/home/home.asp"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">7 Bedford Row</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">, now the Simeon Maskrey QC Chambers. A little while later I discovered that Gary Summers was working at </span><a href="http://www.no5.com/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">No. 5 Chambers</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">, run by Ralph Lewis QC. In about the past year Summers seems to have moved on yet again, and is now listed in the Simon Russell Flint QC Chambers at </span><a href="http://www.23es.com/PeopleDetail.aspx?member=67"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">23 Essex Street</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;">.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: verdana;">It wasn’t until 2007 that I discovered (from my trial solicitor Richard Jefferies) that Gary Summers was the one responsible for giving the advice that the final payment should not be made to purchase shares in the electricity companies, which I was in the process of buying at the time of my arrest. As a result of that advice I lost thousands of pounds of my assets.</span></div></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OperationBilliards-MitrokhinOrOshchenko/~4/YiTHl7OfrIA" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.com0http://parellic.blogspot.com/2010/05/gary-summers-tax-dodgers-barrister.html