Translate

Google+ Badge

Follow by Email

Search This Blog

Saturday, March 25, 2017

I'm not the first to explore this issue, but it seems rarely covered. The basics: an IR photon emitted from the ground into an atmosphere without greenhouse gasses will head in a straight line to space, while molecules of greenhouse gasses like CO2 and H2O, as they are spinning and moving very fast, absorb and re-emit the photons in a random (or largely random) directions. This greatly increases the time they spend in the atmosphere, making it warmer. For example,

The Trail of Tears was a series of forced removals of Native American nations from their ancestral homelands in the Southeastern United States to an area west of the Mississippi River
that had been designated as Native Territory. The forced relocations
were carried out by various government authorities following the passage
of the Indian Removal Act
in 1830. The relocated people suffered from exposure, disease, and
starvation while en route, and more than four thousand died before
reaching their various destinations. The removal included members of the
Cherokee, Muscogee, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations. The phrase "Trail of Tears" originated from a description of the removal of the Cherokee Nation in 1838.[1][2][3]

Between 1830 and 1850, the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole, and
Cherokee people (including Native Americans, and the African freedmen
and slaves who lived among them) were forcibly removed from their
traditional lands in the Southeastern United States, and relocated
farther west.[4] Those Native Americans that were relocated were forced to march to their destinations by state and local militias.[5]

Historical context

Map of United States Indian Removal, 1830-1835. Oklahoma is depicted in light yellow-green.

In 1830, a group of Indians collectively referred to as the Five Civilized Tribes, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, and Seminole, were living as autonomous nations in what would be later called the American Deep South. The process of cultural transformation, as proposed by George Washington and Henry Knox, was gaining momentum, especially among the Cherokee and Choctaw.[12]

American settlers had been pressuring the federal government to
remove Indians from the Southeast; many settlers were encroaching on
Indian lands, while others wanted more land made available to white
settlers. Although the effort was vehemently opposed by many, including
U.S. Congressman Davy Crockett of Tennessee, President Andrew Jackson was able to gain Congressional passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which authorized the government to extinguish Indian title to lands in the Southeast.

In 1831, the Choctaw became the first Nation to be removed, and their
removal served as the model for all future relocations. After two wars,
many Seminoles were removed in 1832. The Creek removal followed in
1834, the Chickasaw in 1837, and lastly the Cherokee in 1838.[13]
Many Indians remained in their ancestral homelands; some Choctaw are
found in Mississippi, Creek in Alabama and Florida, Cherokee in North Carolina,
and Seminole in Florida; a small group had moved to the Everglades and
were never defeated by the government of the United States. A limited
number of non-Indians, including some Africans (many as slaves, and
others as spouses), also accompanied the Indians on the trek westward.[13]
By 1837, 46,000 Indians from the southeastern states had been removed
from their homelands, thereby opening 25 million acres (100,000 km2) for predominantly white settlement.[13]

Prior to 1830, the fixed boundaries of these autonomous tribal nations, comprising large areas of the United States, were subject to continual cession and annexation, in part due to pressure from squatters and the threat of military force in the newly declared U.S. territories—federally administered regions whose boundaries supervened upon the Native treaty claims. As these territories became U.S. states,
state governments sought to dissolve the boundaries of the Indian
nations within their borders, which were independent of state
jurisdiction, and to expropriate the land therein. These pressures were
exacerbated by U.S. population growth and the expansion of slavery in the South, with the rapid development of cotton cultivation in the uplands following the invention of the cotton gin.[14]

Jackson's role

The removals, conducted under Presidents Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren, followed the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
The Act provided the President with powers to exchange land with Native
tribes and provide infrastructure improvements on the existing lands.
The law also gave the president power to pay for transportation costs to
the West, should tribes choose to relocate. The law did not, however,
allow the President to force tribes to move West without a mutually
agreed-upon treaty.[15]

In the years following the Act, the Cherokee filed several lawsuits
regarding conflicts with the state of Georgia. Some of these cases
reached the Supreme Court, the most influential being Worcester v. Georgia
(1832). Samuel Worcester and other non-Indians were convicted by
Georgia law for residing in Cherokee territory in the state of Georgia,
without a license. Worcester was sentenced to prison for four years and
appealed the ruling, arguing that this sentence violated treaties made
between Indian nations and the United States federal government by
imposing state laws on Cherokee lands. The Court ruled in Worcester's
favor, declaring that the Cherokee Nation was subject only to federal
law and that the Supremacy Clause
barred legislative interference by the state of Georgia. Chief Justice
Marshall argued, "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community
occupying its own territory in which the laws of Georgia can have no
force. The whole intercourse between the United States and this Nation,
is, by our constitution and laws, vested in the government of the United
States."[16][17]

Andrew Jackson did not listen to the Supreme Court mandate barring
Georgia from intruding on Cherokee lands. He feared that enforcement
would lead to open warfare between federal troops and the Georgia
militia, which would compound the ongoing crisis in South Carolina and lead to a broader civil war. Instead, he vigorously negotiated a land exchange treaty with the Cherokee.[18] Political opponents Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams, who supported the Worcester decision, were outraged by Jackson’s refusal to uphold Cherokee claims against the state of Georgia.[19]Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote an account of Cherokee assimilation into the American culture, declaring his support of the Worcester decision.[20][21]

Jackson chose to continue with Indian removal, and negotiated The Treaty of New Echota,
on December 29, 1835, which granted Cherokee Indians two years to move
to Indian Territory (modern Oklahoma). Only a fraction of the Cherokees
left voluntarily. The U.S. government, with assistance from state
militias, forced most of the remaining Cherokees west in 1838.[22]
The Cherokees were temporarily remanded in camps in eastern Tennessee.
In November, the Cherokee were broken into groups of around 1,000 each
and began the journey west. They endured heavy rains, snow, and freezing
temperatures.

When the Cherokee negotiated the Treaty of New Echota,
they exchanged all their land east of the Mississippi for land in
modern Oklahoma and a $5 million payment from the federal government.
Many Cherokee felt betrayed that their leadership accepted the deal, and
over 16,000 Cherokee signed a petition to prevent the passage of the
treaty. By the end of the decade in 1840, tens of thousands of Cherokee
and other tribes had been removed from their land east of the
Mississippi River. The Creek, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chicksaw were also
relocated under the Indian Removal Act of 1830. One Choctaw leader
portrayed the removal as "A Trail of Tears and Deaths", a devastating
event that removed most of the Native population of the southeastern
United States from their traditional homelands.[23]

Terminology

The latter forced relocations have sometimes been referred to as "death marches", in particular with reference to the Cherokee march across the Midwest in 1838, which occurred on a predominantly land route.[14]

Indians who had the means initially provided for their own removal.
Contingents that were led by conductors from the U.S. Army included
those led by Edward Deas, who was claimed to be a sympathizer for the Cherokee plight.[citation needed]
The largest death toll from the Cherokee forced relocation comes from
the period after the May 23, 1838 deadline. This was at the point when
the remaining Cherokee were rounded into camps and pressed into oversized detachments, often over 700 in size (larger than the populations of Little Rock or Memphis
at that time). Communicable diseases spread quickly through these
closely quartered groups, killing many. These contingents were among the
last to move, but following the same routes the others had taken; the
areas they were going through had been depleted of supplies due to the
vast numbers that had gone before them. The marchers were subject to
extortion and violence along the route. In addition, these final
contingents were forced to set out during the hottest and coldest months
of the year, killing many. Exposure to the elements, disease and
starvation, harassment by local frontiersmen, and insufficient rations
similarly killed up to one-third of the Choctaw and other nations on the
march.[24]

There exists some debate among historians and the affected tribes as
to whether the term "Trail of Tears" should be used to refer to the
entire history of forced relocations from the United States east of the
Mississippi into Indian Territory (as was the stated U.S. policy), or to the Five Tribes
described above, to the route of the land march specifically, or to
specific marches in which the remaining holdouts from each area were
rounded up.

Legal background

The territorial boundaries claimed as sovereign and controlled by the
Indian nations living in what were then known as the Indian
Territories—the portion of the early United States west of the Mississippi River not yet claimed or allotted to become Oklahoma—were fixed and determined by national treaties with the United States federal government. These recognized the tribal governments as dependent but internally sovereign, or autonomous nations under the sole jurisdiction of the federal government.
While retaining their tribal governance, which included a constitution or official council in tribes such as the Iroquois and Cherokee, many portions of the southeastern Indian nations had become partially or completely economically integrated into the economy of the region. This included the plantation economy in states such as Georgia, and the possession of slaves. These slaves were also forcibly relocated during the process of removal.[14] A similar process had occurred earlier in the territories controlled by the Confederacy of the Six Nations in what is now upstate New York prior to the British invasion and subsequent U.S. annexation of the Iroquois nation.

Under the history of U.S. treaty law, the territorial boundaries claimed by federally recognized tribes received the same status under which the Southeastern tribal claims were recognized; until the following establishment of reservations of land, determined by the federal government, which were ceded to the remaining tribes by de jure treaty, in a process that often entailed forced relocation. The establishment of the Indian Territory
and the extinguishment of Indian land claims east of the Mississippi
anticipated the establishment of the U.S. Indian reservation system. It
was imposed on remaining Indian lands later in the 19th century.

The statutory argument for Indian sovereignty persisted until the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), that (e.g.)
the Cherokee were not a sovereign and independent nation, and therefore
not entitled to a hearing before the court. However, in Worcester v. Georgia
(1832), the court re-established limited internal sovereignty under the
sole jurisdiction of the federal government, in a ruling that both
opposed the subsequent forced relocation and set the basis for modern
U.S. case law.

While the latter ruling was defied by Jackson,[25]
the actions of the Jackson administration were not isolated because
state and federal officials had violated treaties without consequence,
often attributed to military exigency, as the members of individual Indian nations were not automatically United States citizens and were rarely given standing in any U.S. court.

Jackson's involvement in what became known as the Trail of Tears
cannot be ignored. In a speech regarding Indian removal, Jackson said,
"It will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of
whites; free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue
happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will
retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and
perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the Government and
through the influence of good counsels, to cast off their savage habits
and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community.”
According to Jackson, the move would be nothing but beneficial for all
parties. His point of view garnered support from many Americans, many of
whom would benefit economically from the removal.

This was compounded by the fact that while citizenship tests existed
for Indians living in newly annexed areas before and after forced
relocation, individual U.S. states did not recognize tribal land claims,
only individual title
under State law, and distinguished between the rights of white and
non-white citizens, who often had limited standing in court; and Indian removal
was carried out under U.S. military jurisdiction, often by state
militias. As a result, individual Indians who could prove U.S.
citizenship were nevertheless displaced from newly annexed areas.[14] The military actions and subsequent treaties enacted by Jackson's and Martin Van Buren's administrations pursuant to the 1830 law, which Tennessee Congressman Davy Crockett had unsuccessfully voted against,[26]
are widely considered to have directly caused the expulsion or death of
a substantial part of the Indians then living in the southeastern
United States.

Choctaw removal

The Choctaw nation occupied large portions of what are now the U.S. states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. After a series of treaties starting in 1801, the Choctaw nation was reduced to 11,000,000 acres (45,000 km2). The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek
ceded the remaining country to the United States and was ratified in
early 1831. The removals were only agreed to after a provision in the
Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek allowed some Choctaw to remain. George W. Harkins wrote to the citizens of the United States before the removals were to commence:

It is with considerable diffidence that I attempt to address the
American people, knowing and feeling sensibly my incompetency; and
believing that your highly and well improved minds would not be well
entertained by the address of a Choctaw. But having determined to
emigrate west of the Mississippi river this fall, I have thought proper
in bidding you farewell to make a few remarks expressive of my views,
and the feelings that actuate me on the subject of our removal.... We as
Choctaws rather chose to suffer and be free, than live under the
degrading influence of laws, which our voice could not be heard in their
formation.

United States Secretary of War Lewis Cass appointed George Gaines
to manage the removals. Gaines decided to remove Choctaws in three
phases starting in 1831 and ending in 1833. The first was to begin on
November 1, 1831 with groups meeting at Memphis and Vicksburg. A harsh
winter would batter the emigrants with flash floods, sleet, and snow.
Initially the Choctaws were to be transported by wagon but floods halted
them. With food running out, the residents of Vicksburg and Memphis
were concerned. Five steamboats (the Walter Scott, the Brandywine, the
Reindeer, the Talma, and the Cleopatra) would ferry Choctaws to their
river-based destinations. The Memphis group traveled up the Arkansas for
about 60 miles (100 km) to Arkansas Post. There the temperature stayed
below freezing for almost a week with the rivers clogged with ice, so
there could be no travel for weeks. Food rationing consisted of a
handful of boiled corn, one turnip, and two cups of heated water per
day. Forty government wagons were sent to Arkansas Post to transport
them to Little Rock. When they reached Little Rock, a Choctaw chief
referred to their trek as a "trail of tears and death."[28] The Vicksburg group was led by an incompetent guide and was lost in the Lake Providence swamps.

In the whole scene there was an air of ruin and destruction,
something which betrayed a final and irrevocable adieu; one couldn't
watch without feeling one's heart wrung. The Indians were tranquil, but
sombre and taciturn. There was one who could speak English and of whom I
asked why the Chactas were leaving their country. "To be free," he
answered, could never get any other reason out of him. We ... watch the
expulsion ... of one of the most celebrated and ancient American
peoples.

Nearly 17,000 Choctaws made the move to what would be called Indian Territory and then later Oklahoma.[30]
About 2,500–6,000 died along the trail of tears. Approximately
5,000–6,000 Choctaws remained in Mississippi in 1831 after the initial
removal efforts.[24][31]
The Choctaws who chose to remain in newly formed Mississippi were
subject to legal conflict, harassment, and intimidation. The Choctaws
"have had our habitations torn down and burned, our fences destroyed,
cattle turned into our fields and we ourselves have been scourged,
manacled, fettered and otherwise personally abused, until by such
treatment some of our best men have died."[31] The Choctaws in Mississippi were later reformed as the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians and the removed Choctaws became the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. The Choctaws were the first to sign a removal treaty presented by the federal government. President Andrew Jackson
wanted strong negotiations with the Choctaws in Mississippi, and the
Choctaws seemed much more cooperative than Andrew Jackson had imagined. When commissioners and Choctaws came to negotiation agreements it was
said the United States would bear the expense of moving their homes and
that they had to be removed within two and a half years of the signed
treaty.[32]

Seminole resistance

The U.S. acquired Florida from Spain via the Adams–Onís Treaty and took possession in 1821. In 1832 the Seminoles were called to a meeting at Payne's Landing on the Ocklawaha River.
The treaty negotiated called for the Seminoles to move west, if the
land were found to be suitable. They were to be settled on the Creek
reservation and become part of the Creek tribe, who considered them
deserters; some of the Seminoles had been derived from Creek bands but
also from other tribes. Those among the tribe who once were members of
Creek bands did not wish to move west to where they were certain that
they would meet death for leaving the main band of Creek Indians. The
delegation of seven chiefs who were to inspect the new reservation did
not leave Florida until October 1832. After touring the area for several
months and conferring with the Creeks who had already settled there,
the seven chiefs signed a statement on March 28, 1833 that the new land
was acceptable. Upon their return to Florida, however, most of the
chiefs renounced the statement, claiming that they had not signed it, or
that they had been forced to sign it, and in any case, that they did
not have the power to decide for all the tribes and bands that resided
on the reservation. The villages in the area of the Apalachicola River
were more easily persuaded, however, and went west in 1834.[33]
On December 28, 1835 a group of Seminoles and blacks ambushed a U.S.
Army company marching from Fort Brooke in Tampa to Fort King in Ocala, killing all but three of the 110 army troops. This came to be known as the Dade Massacre.

As the realization that the Seminoles would resist relocation sank
in, Florida began preparing for war. The St. Augustine Militia asked the
War Department for the loan of 500 muskets. Five hundred volunteers were mobilized under Brig. Gen. Richard K. Call.
Indian war parties raided farms and settlements, and families fled to
forts, large towns, or out of the territory altogether. A war party led
by Osceola
captured a Florida militia supply train, killing eight of its guards
and wounding six others. Most of the goods taken were recovered by the
militia in another fight a few days later. Sugar plantations along the
Atlantic coast south of St. Augustine were destroyed, with many of the
slaves on the plantations joining the Seminoles.[34]

Other warchiefs such as Halleck Tustenuggee, Jumper, and Black Seminoles
Abraham and John Horse continued the Seminole resistance against the
army. The war ended, after a full decade of fighting, in 1842. The U.S.
government is estimated to have spent about $20,000,000 on the war, at
the time an astronomical sum, and equal to $496,344,828 today. Many
Indians were forcibly exiled to Creek lands west of the Mississippi;
others retreated into the Everglades. In the end, the government gave up
trying to subjugate the Seminole in their Everglades redoubts and left
fewer than 100 Seminoles in peace. However, other scholars state that at
least several hundred Seminoles remained in the Everglades after the
Seminole Wars.[35][36][37]

As a result of the Seminole Wars, the surviving Seminole band of the
Everglades claims to be the only federally recognized tribe which never
relinquished sovereignty or signed a peace treaty with the United
States.

In general the American people tended to view the Indian resistance as unwarranted. An article published by the Virginia Enquirer
on January 26, 1836, called the "Hostilities of the Seminoles",
assigned all the blame for the violence that came from the Seminole's
resistance to the Seminoles themselves. The article accuses the Indians
of not staying true to their word—the promises they supposedly made in
the treaties and negotiations from the Indian Removal Act.[38]

Creek dissolution

After the War of 1812, some Muscogee leaders such as William McIntosh signed treaties that ceded more land to Georgia. The 1814 signing of the Treaty of Fort Jackson signaled the end for the Creek Nation and for all Indians in the South.[39]
Friendly Creek leaders, like Selocta and Big Warrior, addressed Sharp
Knife (the Indian nickname for Andrew Jackson) and reminded him that
they keep the peace. Nevertheless, Jackson retorted that they did not
"cut (Tecumseh's) throat" when they had the chance, so they must now cede Creek lands. Jackson also ignored Article 9 of the Treaty of Ghent that restored sovereignty to Indians and their nations.

Jackson opened this first peace session by faintly acknowledging the
help of the friendly Creeks. That done, he turned to the Red Sticks and
admonished them for listening to evil counsel. For their crime, he said,
the entire Creek Nation must pay. He demanded the equivalent of all
expenses incurred by the United States in prosecuting the war, which by
his calculation came to 23,000,000 acres (93,000 km2) of land. - Robert V. Remini, Andrew Jackson[39]

Eventually, the Creek Confederacy enacted a law that made further land cessions a capital offense. Nevertheless, on February 12, 1825, McIntosh and other chiefs signed the Treaty of Indian Springs, which gave up most of the remaining Creek lands in Georgia.[40] After the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty, McIntosh was assassinated on May 13, 1825, by Creeks led by Menawa.

The Creek National Council, led by Opothle Yohola, protested to the United States that the Treaty of Indian Springs was fraudulent. President John Quincy Adams was sympathetic, and eventually the treaty was nullified in a new agreement, the Treaty of Washington (1826).[41]
The historian R. Douglas Hurt wrote: "The Creeks had accomplished what
no Indian nation had ever done or would do again — achieve the annulment
of a ratified treaty."[42]
However, Governor Troup of Georgia ignored the new treaty and began to
forcibly remove the Indians under the terms of the earlier treaty. At
first, President Adams attempted to intervene with federal troops, but
Troup called out the militia, and Adams, fearful of a civil war,
conceded. As he explained to his intimates, "The Indians are not worth
going to war over."

Although the Creeks had been forced from Georgia, with many Lower Creeks moving to the Indian Territory,
there were still about 20,000 Upper Creeks living in Alabama. However,
the state moved to abolish tribal governments and extend state laws over
the Creeks. Opothle Yohola appealed to the administration of President Andrew Jackson for protection from Alabama; when none was forthcoming, the Treaty of Cusseta was signed on March 24, 1832, which divided up Creek lands into individual allotments.[43]
Creeks could either sell their allotments and receive funds to remove
to the west, or stay in Alabama and submit to state laws. The Creeks
were never given a fair chance to comply with the terms of the treaty,
however. Rampant illegal settlement of their lands by Americans
continued unabated with federal and state authorities unable or
unwilling to do much to halt it. Further, as recently detailed by
historian Billy Winn in his thorough chronicle of the events leading to
removal, a variety of fraudulent schemes designed to cheat the Creeks
out of their allotments, many of them organized by speculators operating
out of Columbus, Georgia and Montgomery, Alabama, were perpetrated
after the signing of the Treaty of Cusseta.[44]
A portion of the beleaguered Creeks, many desperately poor and feeling
abused and oppressed by their American neighbors, struck back by
carrying out occasional raids on area farms and committing other
isolated acts of violence. Escalating tensions erupted into open war
with the United States following the destruction of the village of
Roanoke, Georgia, located along the Chattahoochee River on the boundary
between Creek and American territory, in May 1836. During the so-called "Creek War of 1836" Secretary of WarLewis Cass dispatched General Winfield Scott
to end the violence by forcibly removing the Creeks to the Indian
Territory west of the Mississippi River. With the Indian Removal Act of
1830 it continued into 1835 and after as in 1836 over 15,000 Creeks were
driven from their land for the last time. 3,500 of those 15,000 Creeks
did not survive the trip to Oklahoma where they eventually settled.[23]

Chickasaw monetary removal

The Chickasaw received financial compensation from the United States
for their lands east of the Mississippi River. In 1836, the Chickasaws
had reached an agreement to purchase land from the previously removed
Choctaws after a bitter five-year debate. They paid the Choctaws
$530,000 (equal to $11,558,818 today) for the westernmost part of the
Choctaw land. The first group of Chickasaws moved in 1836 and was led by
John M. Millard. The Chickasaws gathered at Memphis
on July 4, 1836, with all of their assets—belongings, livestock, and
slaves. Once across the Mississippi River, they followed routes
previously established by the Choctaws and the Creeks. Once in Indian Territory, the Chickasaws merged with the Choctaw nation.

Cherokee forced relocation

Cherokee Principal Chief John Ross, photographed before his death in 1866

By 1838, about 2,000 Cherokee had voluntarily relocated from Georgia to Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma). Forcible removals began in May 1838 when General Winfield Scott received a final order from President Martin Van Buren to relocate the remaining Cherokees.[23] Approximately 4,000 Cherokees died in the ensuing trek to Oklahoma.[45] In the Cherokee language, the event is called nu na da ul tsun yi (“the place where they cried”) or nu na hi du na tlo hi lu i (the trail where they cried). The Cherokee Trail of Tears resulted from the enforcement of the Treaty of New Echota, an agreement signed under the provisions of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which exchanged Indian land in the East for lands west of the Mississippi River, but which was never accepted by the elected tribal leadership or a majority of the Cherokee people.

The sparsely inhabited Cherokee lands were highly attractive to
Georgian farmers experiencing population pressure, and illegal
settlements resulted. Long-simmering tensions between Georgia and the
Cherokee Nation were brought to a crisis by the discovery of gold near Dahlonega, Georgia, in 1829, resulting in the Georgia Gold Rush, the second gold rush in U.S. history. Hopeful gold speculators began trespassing on Cherokee lands, and pressure mounted to fulfill the Compact of 1802 in which the US Government promised to extinguish Indian land claims in the state of Georgia.

When Georgia moved to extend state laws over Cherokee lands in 1830, the matter went to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the Marshall court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was not a sovereign and independent nation, and therefore refused to hear the case. However, in Worcester v. Georgia
(1832), the Court ruled that Georgia could not impose laws in Cherokee
territory, since only the national government — not state governments —
had authority in Indian affairs. Worcester v Georgia
is associated with Andrew Jackson's famous, though apocryphal, quote
"John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!" In
reality, this quote did not appear until 30 years after the incident and
was first printed in a textbook authored by Jackson critic Horace Greeley.[18]

Elizabeth "Betsy" Brown Stephens (1903), a Cherokee Indian who walked the Trail of Tears in 1838

Fearing open warfare between federal troops and the Georgia militia,
Jackson decided not to enforce Cherokee claims against the state of
Georgia. He was already embroiled in a constitutional crisis with South Carolina (i.e. the nullification crisis) and favored Cherokee relocation over civil war.[18] With the Indian Removal Act of 1830, the U.S. Congress
had given Jackson authority to negotiate removal treaties, exchanging
Indian land in the East for land west of the Mississippi River. Jackson
used the dispute with Georgia to put pressure on the Cherokees to sign a
removal treaty.[46]

The final treaty, passed in Congress by a single vote, and signed by PresidentAndrew Jackson, was imposed by his successor President Martin Van Buren. Van Buren allowed Georgia, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Alabama
an armed force of 7,000 militiamen, army regulars, and volunteers under
General Winfield Scott to relocate about 13,000 Cherokees to Cleveland,
Tennessee. After the initial roundup, the U.S. military oversaw the
emigration to Oklahoma. Former Cherokee lands were immediately opened to
settlement. Most of the deaths during the journey were caused by
disease, malnutrition, and exposure during an unusually cold winter.[47]

In the winter of 1838 the Cherokee began the 1,000-mile (1,600 km)
march with scant clothing and most on foot without shoes or moccasins.
The march began in Red Clay, Tennessee,
the location of the last Eastern capital of the Cherokee Nation.
Because of the diseases, the Indians were not allowed to go into any
towns or villages along the way; many times this meant traveling much
farther to go around them.[48] After crossing Tennessee and Kentucky, they arrived at the Ohio River across from Golconda in southern Illinois
about the 3rd of December 1838. Here the starving Indians were charged a
dollar a head (equal to $22.49 today) to cross the river on "Berry's
Ferry" which typically charged twelve cents, equal to $2.70 today. They
were not allowed passage until the ferry had serviced all others wishing
to cross and were forced to take shelter under "Mantle Rock," a shelter
bluff on the Kentucky side, until "Berry had nothing better to do".
Many died huddled together at Mantle Rock waiting to cross. Several
Cherokee were murdered by locals. The Cherokee filed a lawsuit against
the U.S. Government through the courthouse in Vienna, suing the government for $35 a head (equal to $787.17 today) to bury the murdered Cherokee.[48]

As they crossed southern Illinois, on December 26, Martin Davis,
Commissary Agent for Moses Daniel's detachment, wrote: "There is the
coldest weather in Illinois I ever experienced anywhere. The streams are
all frozen over something like 8 or 12 inches [20 or 30 cm] thick. We
are compelled to cut through the ice to get water for ourselves and
animals. It snows here every two or three days at the fartherest. We are
now camped in Mississippi [River] swamp 4 miles (6 km) from the river,
and there is no possible chance of crossing the river for the numerous
quantity of ice that comes floating down the river every day. We have
only traveled 65 miles (105 km) on the last month, including the time
spent at this place, which has been about three weeks. It is unknown
when we shall cross the river...."[49]

I fought through the War Between the States and have seen many men
shot, but the Cherokee Removal was the cruelest work I ever knew.

A Trail of Tears map of Southern Illinois from the USDA - U.S. Forest Service

It eventually took almost three months to cross the 60 miles (97 kilometres) on land between the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers.[51]
The trek through southern Illinois is where the Cherokee suffered most
of their deaths. However a few years before forced removal, some
Cherokee who opted to leave their homes voluntarily chose a water-based
route through the Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi rivers. It took only
21 days, but the Cherokee who were forcibly relocated were weary of
water travel.[52]

There were some exceptions to removal. Perhaps 100 Cherokees evaded
the U.S. soldiers and lived off the land in Georgia and other states.
Those Cherokees who lived on private, individually owned lands (rather
than communally owned tribal land) were not subject to removal. In North
Carolina, about 400 Cherokees, known as the Oconaluftee Cherokee, lived
on land in the Great Smoky Mountains owned by a white man named William Holland Thomas
(who had been adopted by Cherokees as a boy), and were thus not subject
to removal. Added to this were some 200 Cherokee from the Nantahala
area allowed to stay in the Qualla Boundary after assisting the U.S. Army in hunting down and capturing the family of the old prophet, Tsali. (Tsali faced a firing squad.) These North Carolina Cherokees became the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Nation.

Landmarks and references

Map of National Historic trails

In 1987, about 2,200 miles (3,500 km) of trails were authorized by
federal law to mark the removal of 17 detachments of the Cherokee
people.[57] Called the "Trail of Tears National Historic Trail," it traverses portions of nine states and includes land and water routes.[58]

Trail of Tears outdoor historical drama, Unto These Hills

An historical drama based on the Trail of Tears, Unto These Hills written by Kermit Hunter,
has sold over five million tickets for its performances since its
opening on July 1, 1950, both touring and at the outdoor Mountainside
Theater of the Cherokee Historical Association in Cherokee, North Carolina.[59][60]

Commemorative medallion

Cherokee artist Troy Anderson was commissioned to design the Cherokee Trail of Tears Sesquicentennial Commemorative Medallion. The falling-tear medallion shows a seven-pointed star, the symbol of the seven clans of the Cherokees.[61]

In literature and oral history

Family Stories From the Trail of Tears is a collection edited by Lorrie Montiero and transcribed by Grant Foreman, taken from the Indian-Pioneer History Collection[62]

About Me

My formal training is in chemistry. I also read a great deal of physics and biology. In fact I very much enjoy reading in general, mostly science, but also some fiction and history. I also enjoy computer programming and writing. I like hiking and exploring nature. I also enjoy people; not too much in social settings, but one on one; also, people with interesting or "off-beat" minds draw me to them. I also have some interest in Buddhism.

These days I get a lot more information from the internet, primarily through Wiki. Some television, e. g., documentaries, PBS shows like "Nova" and "Nature".

My favorite science writers are Jacob Bronowski ("The Ascent of Man") and Richard Dawkins (his "The Blind Watchmaker" is right up there up Ascent). I also have a favorite writer on Buddhism, Pema Chodron. Favorite films are "Annie Hall" (by Woody Allen), "The Maltese Falcon", "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest", "As Good As It Gets", "Conspiracy Theory", Monty Python's "Search For The Holy Grail" and "Life of Brian", and a few others which I can't think about at the moment.

I love a number of classical works (Beethoven's "Pastoral", "Afternoon Of A Fawn" and "Clair De Lune" by Debussey , Pachelbel's "Canon" come to mind. My favorite piece is probably Gershwin's "Rhapsody in Blue". But I also enjoy a great deal in modern music, including many jazz pieces, folk songs by people like Dylan, Simon and Garfunkel, a hodgepodge of pieces by Crosby, Stills, and Nash, Niel Young, and practically everything the Beatles wrote.

My life over the last few years has been in some disarray, but I am finally "getting it together.". As I am very much into the sciences and writing, I would like to move more in this direction. I also enjoy teaching. As for my political leanings, most people would probably describe as basically liberal, though not extremely so. My religious leanings are to the absolutely none: I've alluded to my interest in Buddhism, but again this is not any supernatural or scientifically untested aspect of it but in the way it provides a powerful philosophy and set of practical, day to day methods of dealing with myself and the other human beings.