If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

<snip>Any extra cost that lacks payment authorized by Congress would require the president to find money within the budget to pay it, while any tax cut would require a corresponding increase in tax revenue.

Some costs would be exempt, including Medicare payments to doctors, the estate and gift tax, and tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2002, the White House statement said.[end of article]

Kinda like shutting the barn doors after the herd (TARP, budget) got out, but hey, never too late to start, right?

You determine how the conversation goes. Keep it clean, and you'll get nothing but honest discussion. Start flaming, and it's party time. :D

What this means is that Obama and the Democrats will use smoke and mirrors for their spending but that same method can not be used for tax cuts. For example, the health care plan will use projected saving which may or not be accurate but extrapolation of tax cuts is a no go. Obama and the Democraps are clever.

Does the article tell which items would not be included in paygo? You know like - entitlements - bailouts - those sorts of things . . . .This is nothing more than a way for them to justify raising taxes.

True, doubling the Fed gasoline tax is next. These monkeys in DC would like to add a buck or two onto the 18.4 cents per gal tax. Gotta pay for all that green energy.

Of course! Because it's too stupid and backwards and inefficient to pay for itself. FUNNY THING that Barry says that these terrorist supporting nations have the right to nuclear power - and yet - we don't.