The United States Patent and Trademark Office today granted Apple a patent related to a "Case for wearable electronic device," and it's described as an accessory that would let users charge their Apple Watch while on the go while also storing a few extra bands (via Patently Apple). Similar to portable battery packs, or Apple's own AirPods case, users would charge the Apple Watch case itself, and then when traveling they could place their Apple Watch within the case to recharge it.

In the patent's images, the case appears rectangular in shape, with the left side housing two rows for two pairs of Apple Watch bands, while the right side has a cutout for the Apple Watch case. In this particular patent, users would have to remove the bands to charge the Apple Watch and then store them next to it. According to the patent, there would be an "attachment system" -- magnets are suggested -- so that bands of "different geometry" would all still be secure within the case.

​

The patent specifies that the case would be able to store bands "having multiple segments," like Sport Bands, and bands "having a single segment," like Milanese Loop.

Quote

Case 200 can be used, for example, as a travel case to store a wearable electronic device and one or more bands that can be used to secure the wearable electronic device to a user's wrist. As shown in FIG. 2, case 200 is designed to hold a single wrist-worn electronic device 230 along with first and second bands 232 and 234 either one of which can be used to attach wrist-worn electronic device to a user's wrist.

Each of bands 232 and 234 includes first and second band segments (e.g., segments 234a, 234b of band 234) that can be connected together by a clasp or other type of connector (e.g., clasp 116 shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B), and each band segment includes a lug (not labeled) at one end. Embodiments of the disclosure can store bands having multiple segments, such as bands 232, 234, as well as bands having a single segment.

Click to expand...

Apple's patent even suggests the case could charge a "smart band," which would include some form of circuitry and have abilities that supplement the Apple Watch with additional sensors or extra battery. Smart bands have been unearthed previously in Apple patents dating back to 2016, as well as in rumors claiming knowledge of the company's plans from spring 2017, but we have still yet to see such a product debut from Apple.

Some accessory makers have had trouble launching smart bands for Apple Watch, and in 2016 when Apple's watchOS 2.0.1 update blocked off third-party band manufacturers from taking advantage of the accessory port to fuel the abilities of such bands, the "Reserve Strap" was left defunct.

​

In regards to today's patent, it would otherwise appear to function similar to the Apple Watch's existing induction charging puck, allowing users to simply place the wearable device inside the case's cradle, close it to protect the screen, and charge it up before wearing it again. The patent doesn't specifically divulge how many additional charges could be added onto the Apple Watch, but it does state that Apple has gone through a few embodiments of the case adding or removing additional band storage to make it slightly larger or smaller, apparently settling on storage for two bands in this iteration.

There are many portable third-party Apple Watch charging solutions on the market today, but some have downsides for users wanting to charge Apple Watch while traveling. Twelve South's TimePorter case, for example, lets users store a few bands and the Apple Watch charging puck, but it charges the Apple Watch on the outside of the case, so it isn't great for charging in a bag or suitcase.

As with any patent, Apple's Apple Watch charging case may never become available for users to purchase, but it is interesting to see what the company is considering to launch alongside future generations of the Apple Watch.

I'm hoping this patent will see the light. It's interesting if the "band circuitry" is in the making. If it's true, then finally the accessory port has some useful features with the new "smart bands".
At least we'll get a power smart band that could extend the watch's life for, say, 3 extra days.

I don't know if this will be practical. The way I see the image, you'll have to disassemble the watch from the band to charge every time (i.e. if the watch body needs to slot into depression 230 or 214).

I'm hoping this patent will see the light. It's interesting if the "band circuitry" is in the making. If it's true, then finally the accessory port has some useful features with the new "smart bands".
At least we'll get a power smart band that could extend the watch's life for, say, 3 extra days.

Apple's newly granted patent covers their invention relating to a case that can securely hold and store an Apple Watch. Embodiments of the case can include circuitry that can charge the stored electronic device and some embodiments can further include circuitry that can charge the one or more bands stored in the case if those bands have electronic components, such as circuitry, sensors and/or batteries that also require power.

Apple convinced a patent examiner that the case is both innovative and non-obvious (the two hurdles for a utility patent). This, therefore, isn't "just" a case. There is something different about it, and we'd have to read the patent to figure it out.

I don't know if this will be practical. The way I see the image, you'll have to disassemble the watch from the band to charge every time (i.e. if the watch body needs to slot into depression 230 or 214).

Click to expand...

I have a few bands and i only wear the black band the watch came with... definitely not taking off the bands just to charge the watch.

Interesting concept. I think this would probably be beneficial for somebody that travels heavily. And something else, just because Apple files a patent, doesn’t mean that this will actually be a product. But nonetheless, this seems something like they would develop an accessory for the Apple Watch charging a small premium as well.

I see what you mean, but when a company literally copies a notch of your current phone you can't be too cautious. This protects them from lawsuits.

Click to expand...

Yup.
RE the notch. People were laughing at Apple at first. Now, everybody is copying the notch, even if they don't have a reason to. Eg. the upcoming Asus Zenfone, has the notch while still have bezels. It's embarrassing.

Yup.
RE the notch. People were laughing at Apple at first. Now, everybody is copying the notch, even if they don't have a reason to. Eg. the upcoming Asus Zenfone, has the notch while still have bezels. It's embarrassing.

Click to expand...

You say others are copying the notch. How likely is that this display is manufactured in high quantities , that these other phone makers are kind of stuck with it, because it's the cheaper direction to go? Just a thought.

You say others are copying the notch. How likely is that this display is manufactured in high quantities , that these other phone makers are kind of stuck with it, because it's the cheaper direction to go? Just a thought.

Click to expand...

Huh? If that's the case, then everybody will have the exact large notches like the iPhone X. But no, they all have variable sizes, and most of them are smaller since they don't use any advance front facing camera. They just do it as a trend.

Heck, the one I mentioned, Asus, didn't even bother going bezel-less, so having the notch is purely cosmetic design decision instead of necessity.

Huh? If that's the case, then everybody will have the exact large notches like the iPhone X. But no, they all have variable sizes, and most of them are smaller since they don't use any advance front facing camera. They just do it as a trend.

Heck, the one I mentioned, Asus, didn't even bother going bezel-less, so having the notch is purely cosmetic design decision instead of necessity.

Click to expand...

It was just a thought, not fact, personally, I have a love/hate with the notch, ears, or what ever anyone is calling them. Personally, I don't have a X, still rocking my 7+. I don't want it because I want TouchID and it doesn't exist on the X.

MacRumors attracts a broad audience
of both consumers and professionals interested in
the latest technologies and products. We also boast an active community focused on
purchasing decisions and technical aspects of the iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Mac platforms.