originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
As soon as I read the beginning of your post I thought of the supposed Hubble Telescope Angels. I think there are lifeforms in and around the planet
that we would consider angels. Some angels are supposedly so bright they're like stars. I could buy that there's sentries or guardians watching the
universe, and maybe they physically materialize to show themselves.

I believe they exist, but I have read the cosmonaut sightings were very sketchy and poorly sourced. S + F, thankyou for reminding me about the Hubble
sightings!

I to beleive, but am having trouble understanding such biology...would such beings be organic? Blood and bone?

Or are they more etheric and able to manifest and dematerialise into existence?

I've heard of group hallucinations but I did not know the next group encountered the same phenomena.

I haven't heard of any like that, not a mass hallucination type thing, a small group all seeing what they described as beings the size of boeing
jets.
We are talking hallucination induced by gas. it would seem like they would see all kinds of things.

As far as the article I read about the next set of cosmonauts seeing the same thing, maybe they got it wrong and it was what in the OP is stated
this

the crew were joined by another three cosmonauts from the Soyuz T-12 spacecraft: Svetlana Savitskaya, Igor Volk and Vladimir Dzhanibekov.

Shortly after joining them, the Salyut 7 was once again visited by the Angelic beings.

There is a lot more we do not yet know about this reality than we do know. Denying something because we can't comprehend it is not right. We can't
believe everything either, but we shouldn't discount everything without first investigating it.

What energy patterns structure these kind of things. Why do clouds sometimes look like things we see in nature? Why do certain shapes repeat
themselves all throughout space, shapes we see here on earth.

originally posted by: rickymouse
There is a lot more we do not yet know about this reality than we do know. Denying something because we can't comprehend it is not right. We can't
believe everything either, but we shouldn't discount everything without first investigating it.

originally posted by: butcherguy
I don't log on to ATS to read stories from the Weekly World News. (I read that in line at the grocery store)
When I saw the thread title, I thought... 'Why is this thread NOT in the hoax bin?'

That is not the only news source that has the russian cosmonaut story, and that is also not the only source presented in the OP.

Pravda's interesting to say the least. One story they reported involved unidentified creatures found in a flooded trench in Russia. I've never seen
anything like them before and despite their sometimes outrageous story titles, they do have gems occasionally.

Pravda's interesting to say the least. One story they reported involved unidentified creatures found in a flooded trench in Russia. I've never seen
anything like them before and despite their sometimes outrageous story titles, they do have gems occasionally.

This third picture reminds me of how the "HAARP" related spirals over the Norwegian sky looked.

And yet HARRP had nothing to do with that, and the spirals were from a test launch of a Bulova missile.

Well, now it appears the mystery of the phenomenon, which bore some resemblance to a spiral galaxy, has been solved. Russia says it was the result
of a failed test launch for its troubled Bulava missile program. In a statement, the Russian Defense Ministry said it fired a Bulava from a submarine
in the White Sea near the Norwegian coast Wednesday morning. The intercontinental ballistic missile's first two stages worked perfectly, the ministry
said, though the third stage engine proved "unstable."

a reply to: tsurfer2000h
Indeed. I have posted links in other threads before, showing that spirals have been created by rockets and observed since the 1960's. Perfectly
functioning rockets have created atmospheric spirals.

originally posted by: butcherguy
I don't log on to ATS to read stories from the Weekly World News. (I read that in line at the grocery store)
When I saw the thread title, I thought... 'Why is this thread NOT in the hoax bin?'

That is not the only news source that has the russian cosmonaut story, and that is also not the only source presented in the OP.

Try reading a bit more before posting

OG

This story would not have to be in the WWN to be a WWN story.
Let me know when one of these angels alights somewhere else for a great photo shoot.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.