dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump

Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile, but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it?

El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 20:35 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile, > but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow > problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have > enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it? > > Its bugs: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tigcc&list_id=978701> > Thanks

Or maybe we should simply treeclean it if nobody is willing to fix/maintain it and since nothing in the tree needs it...

On 04/29/12 07:48, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 20:35 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: >> Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile, >> but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow >> problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have >> enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it? >> >> Its bugs: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tigcc&list_id=978701>> >> Thanks > > Or maybe we should simply treeclean it if nobody is willing to > fix/maintain it and since nothing in the tree needs it... > I've submitted what I hope is fix for the buffer overflow problem to bug 337059. Will that be sufficient to remove the block on stabilization? - --Chris Reffett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/