And to keep a discussion "honest" you invoke a paper that purports
to argue "code quality" comparisons based on size of IBM. Under some
overall umbrella of "technical discussion". Are you totally insane?

> > The IBM url above appears to be a marketing push for DB2 and as such> cannot be trusted very far.

Amazing! Took you how long to figure this out?
What was that about the "discussion honest"? Ah yes: more
marketing CRAP!

> It's been a long time since I was hands on with DB2. It was a fine> product then and is I am sure vastly improved, just as oracle has been> improved.