Bill to block state implementation of Obamacare clears Georgia legislature

ATLANTA -- In the final moments of the 40-day legislative session’s 39th day, the Senate gave final passage to a watered-down version of a bill to block state employees from helping Georgians sign up for health insurance under the federal Affordable Care Act.

Related Stories

The proposal was tacked onto another healthcare measure, House Bill 493, before the Senate agreed to it in a party-line vote about 5 minutes before the midnight cutoff for the next-to-the-last day of the current legislative session, sending it to the governor to sign it into law. It aims to prohibit the use of state employees or resources to encourage the public to enroll in what has become known as Obamacare.

“I think it sends a message repeatedly today that we do not agree with the Affordable Care Act,” said Senate Health Committee Chairwoman Renee Unterman, a nurse and a Republican from Buford.

Before it was weakened, the original proposal, sponsored by Rep. Jason Spencer, R-Woodbine, and a group of tea-party freshmen had a blanket ban on state activity to implement the federal law. It blocked the insurance commissioner from enforcing the federal mandates in policies sold in the state, and it empowered the attorney general to prosecute anyone or any state agency that stepped over the line.

It specifically would have required the University of Georgia to turn over to the state general treasury a $2.2 million federal grant to supply “navigators” who help members of the public find an insurance plan. And it would have kept school employees from carrying out the navigator role.

The version that ultimately passed allows the school to complete the functions under the current grant but would prohibit it from getting a new one. Plus it now says the insurance commissioner is in no way prevented from policing the insurance companies and following up on complaints.

Also exempted from the prohibitions of the version sent to the governor are “institutions of higher learning or otherwise.” State employees can’t try to influence public opinion but they can influence public policy.

Asked what practical effect the bill will have after all of the exceptions, Unterman said, “I think it’s a very strong statement.”

Democrats complained that the bill amounted to efforts by southern states in the 1850s to nullify federal laws they didn’t agree with. They also compared it to southerners’ reluctance to end racial segregation despite federal laws and court decisions.

They claimed Republicans chiefly are bucking the federal law because they don’t like President Barack Obama.

“We in this state have a political problem,” said Sen. David Lucas, D-Macon. “You don’t like the man who did the plan.”

Earlier in the day, the Senate gave final passage of HB 990, which addresses another aspect of Obamacare, namely the expansion of Medicaid. Sponsored by the leaders of the House and also hotly debated by Democrats, it requires the legislature to approve any changes in Medicaid eligibility that would allow people with higher incomes to enroll.

Obamacare was designed with Medicaid being expanded to cover more people of modest incomes. Those with middle incomes can get insurance through health exchanges with taxpayers subsidizing the premiums.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled states have the option not to expand Medicaid, and Georgia is among those that chose not to, citing the cost to the state budget. In arguing for HB 990, Republican leaders said that only the legislature should authorize Medicaid changes because the state constitution requires the General Assembly to balance the budget every year.

Gov. Nathan Deal has 40 days to decide to sign or veto the bills after the legislature wraps up Thursday. He has said he agrees with HB 990, and Spencer said the governor was part of the negotiations on the final version of the bill to block Obamacare implementation.

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for
following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and
comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are
automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some
comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules,
click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

Until we (everyone) ignore all defense of Obama based on his race this country is stuck in the mud. Supporting Obama's inept presidency just because he is black is the same as condemning his policies just because he is black. Obama's supporters aren't interested in the facts.

Good move. We need to protect our fellow Georgians from the ill effects of this (un)affordable (has nothing to do with)healthcare act. Lets come up with a better way to insure Americans, mainly without the big government getting in the way.

In other words, you have no defense for your position whatsoever (aside from the fact that race and party are reasons 1 and 1a for your position). I can take either side of any given issue and provide arguments for and against without ever mentioning race. To start calling names without even trying to defend your actions is just plain lazy and proves that you should not be anywhere near the building that comes up with our laws.

"Gotta love people that oppose everybody having health insurance."
corgimom, why should I be forced to pay for yours or anybody else's healthcare? I have an idea, you pay for yours and I'll pay for mine.

This item seems to limit the executive power of the governor and may require a constitutional amendment. It should be challenged in court. Presumably , the only reason it was passed relates to the strong possibility that the governor will not be reelected.

Georgia wants to pass a law to make the Obamacare law unenforceable in Georgia because they think the federal governments has overstepped their boundaries and it because they are racist? Obama refuses to enforce immigration laws, illegally changes laws passed by congress, threatens to bypass the the legislative branch with his pen and phone, lies about the dreadful healthcare law, allows his attorney general to tell other attorney generals that if they don't like laws they don't have to enforce them therefore breaking every oath of office they both took yet your argument is it's about race? Wow....I just have no words to explain the ignorance of politicians....

Congrats to the GA legislative body for their attempt to stop this monstrosity from hurting GA citizens. Scorn for the idiot that had to throw the race card into the pot. I guess this is the only argument libs can use when there's no other rational argument. It's been used so much it doesn't mean anything anymore. Nobody's afraid of that wolf anymore.

LL, you already ARE subsiding these people. Take a look at your next hospital bill, you are paying for the ones who don't have insurance.

And you also get to pay through taxes.

That's why so many people just don't understand, either everybody can have insurance or people like you and me, LL, can foot the bill for other people who can't "afford" insurance- but have plenty of money to buy cigarettes, liquor, take vacations, eat out, etc.

I'm stuck with the decades-old precedent that emergency rooms must admit whomever shows up at there doors. I can't change that.

But what I'm complaining about above is the brand new system of subsidizing insurance premiums of people making up to four times the official government poverty level (which is $94,000 for a family of four) under Affordable Care Act. That is brand new, and it could be dismantled if people work at it before it becomes entrenched. Vote for the Tea Party candidate this fall if one is on your ballot.