http://www.profitconfidential.com/economic-analysis/washingtons-balancing-act-gets-more-difficult/
Washington's Balancing Act Gets More Difficult
George Leong, B.Comm.
Profit Confidential
2007-04-04T10:00:50Z
2017-07-03 07:37:54 I’ve talked about the rising trend of the U.S. trade deficit in the past. While the government and many U.S. manufacturers may not like it, the American consumer is clearly benefiting from lower prices at the cash registers.
Economic Analysis

I've talked about the rising trend of the U.S. trade deficit in the past. While the government and many U.S. manufacturers may not like it, the American consumer is clearly benefiting from lower prices at the cash registers. The rising trade deficit remains a very hot issue in Washington, and it will get even more heated going forward.

Washington is not happy after the current record $232.5 billion U.S. trade deficit with China. There has been constant pressure on Beijing to allow more flexibility to the Yuan, which has been edging higher, but remains well below what many believed is the fair market value.

Until now, there was speculation that Congress would need to enforce higher tariffs on Chinese imports. Now it seems like this speculation may escalate -- especially since March 30 when the Bush administration suggested that it would impose economic sanctions against China in order to protect American paper producers from "unfair Chinese government subsidies."

The decision to initiate tariffs could now filter to other areas of American industry, including steel, textiles, furniture, clothing, and just about anything else you can think of.

While protecting American jobs is foremost, you must also consider the real fact that tariffs will increase the price of many goods in the U.S., thereby threatening to slow down key consumer spending and reduce disposable income for Americans, especially those in lower tax brackets who benefit from cheaper goods

As I said in the past, there is a tradeoff here. The unfortunate loss of jobs in the U.S. manufacturing sector is not easy to accept, but, at the same time, consumer hungry Americans are paying less for many goods such as clothing, electronics, and food. This helps many U.S. businesses. Washington must not lose sight of this when working on its trade policies. So the strategy to control the trade deficit will need to be carefully thought out. Washington must balance the trade deficit with the lower costs paid by American consumers.

Washington’s Balancing Act Gets More Difficult

By George Leong, B.Comm. Published : April 4, 2007

I’ve talked about the rising trend of the U.S. trade deficit in the past. While the government and many U.S. manufacturers may not like it, the American consumer is clearly benefiting from lower prices at the cash registers. The rising trade deficit remains a very hot issue in Washington, and it will get even more heated going forward.

Washington is not happy after the current record $232.5 billion U.S. trade deficit with China. There has been constant pressure on Beijing to allow more flexibility to the Yuan, which has been edging higher, but remains well below what many believed is the fair market value.

Until now, there was speculation that Congress would need to enforce higher tariffs on Chinese imports. Now it seems like this speculation may escalate — especially since March 30 when the Bush administration suggested that it would impose economic sanctions against China in order to protect American paper producers from “unfair Chinese government subsidies.”

The decision to initiate tariffs could now filter to other areas of American industry, including steel, textiles, furniture, clothing, and just about anything else you can think of.

While protecting American jobs is foremost, you must also consider the real fact that tariffs will increase the price of many goods in the U.S., thereby threatening to slow down key consumer spending and reduce disposable income for Americans, especially those in lower tax brackets who benefit from cheaper goods

As I said in the past, there is a tradeoff here. The unfortunate loss of jobs in the U.S. manufacturing sector is not easy to accept, but, at the same time, consumer hungry Americans are paying less for many goods such as clothing, electronics, and food. This helps many U.S. businesses. Washington must not lose sight of this when working on its trade policies. So the strategy to control the trade deficit will need to be carefully thought out. Washington must balance the trade deficit with the lower costs paid by American consumers.

Dear Reader: There is no magic formula to getting rich. Success in investment vehicles with the best prospects for price appreciation can only be achieved through proper and rigorous research and analysis. We are 100% independent in that we are not affiliated with any bank or brokerage house. Information contained herein, while believed to be correct, is not guaranteed as accurate. Warning: Investing often involves high risks and you can lose a lot of money. Please do not invest with money you cannot afford to lose. The opinions in this content are just that, opinions of the authors. We are a publishing company and the opinions, comments, stories, reports, advertisements and articles we publish are for informational and educational purposes only; nothing herein should be considered personalized investment advice. Before you make any investment, check with your investment professional (advisor). We urge our readers to review the financial statements and prospectus of any company they are interested in. We are not responsible for any damages or losses arising from the use of any information herein. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.