>The Bayesian approach does not suffer
>from this self-imposed constriction.
BTW, I've not missed the interesting 'correlation' between the above
statement and a similar quality that's in the way that I work. It's a
common 'goal' in Science - seek 'invariables', the more-encompassing
the better.
Einstein's first name for "Relativity Theory" was "Invariance Theory"
:-]
ken
Robert Dodier wrote in message
<6714766d.0211100808.2aac763c at posting.google.com>...
>Sturla Molden <sturla at molden_dot_net.invalid> wrote:
>[...]