He would not see freedom for more than three years. His captor was the United States Government. He was taken from his home in Pakistan to Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan; soon, he found himself thousands of miles away, at Guantanamo Bay Prison in the Caribbean Sea.

The Americans accused Begg, who is a dual Pakistani-British citizen, with aiding the Taliban and al Qaeda. He denied the charges, and was never formally charged or prosecuted.

He spent three years at Guantanamo – two in solitary confinement – before the British government successfully lobbied for his release.

“My father, he did a very high-profile campaign,” Begg told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Thursday. “He said, ‘Please either charge my son or release him if he’s not committed a crime. … Apply the rule of law, because you’ve claimed that your country is one that establishes it, and boasts this as a civilization factor for the rest of the world.’”

Now, as over a hundred detainees at Guantanamo enter their fourth month of a hunger strike, many of them cleared for release, Begg is stepping up his campaign to make the world aware of their continued imprisonment.

“The first time that Obama said that he’s going to close Guantanamo, everybody believed him,” Begg said. “So when I go around the world and campaign and fight for the rights of the prisoners, people say, ‘Oh, isn’t that place closed?’”

Begg hopes the world will, once again, pay attention.

“The only way that they can get their voice across, as it were, is to hunger strike to point of death,” Begg said.

Being held in solitary confinement at Guantanamo – as Begg was, and many detainees now are – fosters a special kind of hopelessness, Begg said.

“It means that you don’t know what you’re there for,” he said, “or if you’re even going to see the inside of courtroom, or the face of your accuser, or have the notion of ever being released in a sane sort of way.”

Thanks to the efforts of his father, and his government, Begg was released.

He has done something that seems rather unimaginably, given his experience. He has befriended many of his former captors.

“I came across several soldiers,” Begg said, “who were really decent. Who treated me in a way, and many other prisoners in a way that earned for them the respect that we still have to this day.”

He is Facebook friends with them, he has travelled with them – he has even had them over to his house, to eat with his wife and children.

"The question I would ask though for a lot of Americans viewers,” he said, “is would American viewers reciprocate this? Would they invite former Guantanamo prisoners and others to the United States in order to be welcome in their homes? Or are we only welcome in prisons, where we’re tortured.”

Christiane Amanpour as usual doing the best interviews in CNN. are the people in charge of Guantanamo psychopaths? no, really, they are afraid of the consequences of releasing them and they convince themselves that things will happen that wont.

No. The detainees are not an easy sell because they have been branded guilty without trials, and the US refuses to take them itself. But Bush released hundreds and Obama transferred about 70 when the process ground to a halt. A large group are from Yemen and they were all put on hold because the Xmas bomber had a connection there. Obama did that himself but the Congress has made so many conditions on release, an official said it's almost impossible to send them anywhere. The new Yemen government wants its people and is lobbying for them. Britain says it wants their last detainee who has been "cleared" since 2007. They didn't seem to have any post release security measures in the early Bush years. They dropped people off like stray animals thousands of ,miles from their home. They dropped a Canadian in some place like the Balkans. Now they've probably gone too far the other way.

The questions Amanpour may have missed that probably should be asked is: What did the prisoner do to get put in Guantanamo? and What sort of torture are they talking about? and How is the food and water compared to where they came from? and How is the medical and dental care compared to where they came from? and Are they allowed to worship who or what they please? and What will they do when/if they get out and where will they go? Amanpour's interview was weak and even biased. What is her agenda? What did Moazzam Begg do to be incarcerated to begin with?

Silly questions.but listen 1) please read "INSIDE THE WIRE" by Erik Saar. When Kabul was captured, US Army announced that $ 5000 would be paid for each al-Qaida man ,if captured and handed over to them. Hundreds of Afghanis captured innocents for dollars. 2) you are lucky that you could not reach Afghanistan. Better to talk to your fellow Americans who suffered as a captive. 3) Food and water: I shall advice you to make a tour of the Muslim world. Have you heard of Turkish bath ? It is cheap if I write that the Arabs were and still are taking the best. It were the Moors of Spain who invented fork and knife, candle and napkins , chairs and table ....vis-a-vis etiquette of eating.when the whole west was yet in the caves.

Comparing food, water, medical & dental care, hygene of a captive life with life spent with your family and kids as a free citizen is totally unfair. As far as torture is concerned, leaving behind the physical torture which may be present, is less painfull to know that you have done nothing wrong yet you are chained and have been put in cage thousands of miles away from your family. And I say they did nothing wrong because if US government had some thing against them, they would have been charged long ago.

As if that's been proven or even alleged in a court of law. Many (western) people outside the US think Americans are just torturers – at least we've got more proof of that. When will the US start behaving like a civilised western nation again?

Thanks so much to Moazzam Begg for sharing such insight views of what is really like being in Guantanoma prison and importantly for showing an example of friendship, of seeing and treating people as for who they really are, empathising for the actions that have to be done in order to fulfil their duties to their countries. Well, I am sure we all appreciate the good intention of President Obama wanting to close the Guantanamo prison as soon as possible, however, we also understand that such decision will take time to gain approval from the congress and other people before it actually happens. I believe many detainees are losing hope, they themselves as well as many Americans and people around the world are desperate to see some actions now. I believe the President could release the ones that have been cleared, have been decided to be innocent and could be released or transferred until the US could find solutions to deal with all the rest of the detainees who have not been evidently found guilty or innocent, those who are still classed as too 'dangerous' to be elsewhere etc in order to reach the final decision of actually closing the whole facility of Guantanamo prison.

How would the US feel if China or some other country rounded up some people in the US (e.g. CIA agents) and held them overseas in legal limbo? They could make equal argument that some Americans are war criminals.

When will the US actually stop to think about why so many people are that upset with the US that they would attack the US? Time to think about whether it's anything the US has done, or how to behave internationally. Perhaps even make peace. Until the US figures that out, I would expect the US will continue to have a large bullseye painted on itself and the rest of us unfortunately get dragged along for the ride.

This whole story is hogwash!
"He was taken from his home in Pakistan to Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan; soon, he found himself thousands of miles away, at Guantanamo Bay Prison in the Caribbean Sea."

Pakistan is a democracy like the United States. Who "took" him and why? Was is Pakistan, if so, why were they not help responsible for this fiasco and sued in court? What was the charge by the Pakistan authorities who violated the prisoners rights and set the ball in motion?
Sounds like Pakistan is a banana republic that arrests its own citizens and turns them over to the US, unless their is a good reason?
No wonder the drones attacks continue in Pakistan, it must be the Pakistan government requesting them.
Hmm, its started to make sense.

I hate to admit it but unfortunatly your assumptions about both the drone attacks and arrests of Pakistani citizens during the President Musharaf's regime are true. Those arrests were actually a form of kidnapping and the relatives of such people are still looking for them and there are hundreds of cases in courts against government agencies for missing persons.

There is a book here. However, I am guessing most of the prisoners would go back and kill Americans if given the chance. If they were at all involved in a holy war, and have blood on their hands, they should be kept captive for a long time.

So wait, were the guards at Guantanamo decent people who you'd want over for dinner, or were the prisoners tortured? Also, as someone else pointed out, who invites complete strangers over for dinner? To put it another way, if I had a Pakistani friend who I found out had been held at Guantanamo and then released without charges, I might very well invite him over for dinner. Since I don't, I would not invite complete strangers over for dinner, merely because they were held in Guantanamo.

Post a comment

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.