The Quest: Part 2(13 Apr. 2007)

The SG-1 team hadn't counted on a real dragon as the guardian, until one flies out, breathing fire. However, Daniel thinks the Sangraal probably is a hologram. They escape, but the dragon ... See full summary »

Storyline

The SG-1 team hadn't counted on a real dragon as the guardian, until one flies out, breathing fire. However, Daniel thinks the Sangraal probably is a hologram. They escape, but the dragon follows them outside. Ba'al admits not to know its secret name, while Daniel believes that the name probably holds power over it. While they guess, Cam thinks of luring the dragon to blow it up, but the C4 barely impresses its digestion. Daniel makes it disappear by using Morgan LeFay's name in Ancient, Ganos Lal. They find it had guarded the frozen 'grave' of the realm's arch-magician, Merlin (or rather, Myrrdin). Vala accidentally triggers a mechanism, which revives Merlin, when she approaches an Ancient repository device. In the meantime, the team is transported to other planet via the obelisk by the gate outside. Sam surmises that the gate and obelisk are programmed to dial automatically every few hours and transport them to a set of planets that are cut off from the rest of the gate system. ... Written by
KGF Vissers and edited extensively by Kyah

User Reviews

Sg1 defeats the Sangreal's guardian to find out that the Sangreal was a hologram...They get teleported to a cave where they find Merlin in a stasis pod and an ancient storing device which gets activated a few moments later.Merlin is revived and Dr Jackson starts telling him what happened in the last 1000 years since he was in stasis.Merlin goes to the ancient storage device downloads his memories and leaves Dr Jackson to do the hard work of building the Sangreal.Meanwhile Adria tries to guess the location where sg1 was teleported...after a few tries she finds the planet and sg1 .Dr Jackson tries to stop her but he is to exhausted,he manages to buy some time for the sg1 team to use the stargate and get back to earth.

4 of 14 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?