The Death Of Catholic Universities In America

Catholic universities in
America are typically regarded as offering a well-rounded education
combined with one of the premier intellectual forces of the West: the
Catholic Church, and its vast well of knowledge in almost every
discipline. Unlike state-sponsored institutions, which can offer a
quality education, Catholic universities have the advantage of a
grounded and time-tested moral foundation.

This foundation, and the discoveries, advances, and progress it has
produced, is unrivaled in any other Western tradition. Secular
universities, good though they may be, lack the basic direction Catholic
universities receive by their nature. As a result, secular universities
are more prone to moral decay and moral bankruptcy than religiously
affiliated institutions. Daniel Payne addressed recently in his article,
“From Fake Rapes To Petty ‘Microaggressions,’ American Colleges Have Lost Their Way.”

Despite the moral bedrock that Catholic universities are founded
upon, Catholic-American institutions of higher education have lost sight
of their institutional identities. At this point, only direct
intervention from the Vatican can reverse their decline and death.

Catholic Universities Sponsor Anti-Catholic Activities

Catholic universities regularly engage in or sanction activity that
obviously contradicts their mission as an arm of the church, yet defend
it with doublespeak about free speech and a heavy dose of cognitive
dissonance, saying that permitting an activity or group on campus does not equal endorsement. But actions belie statements, and Catholic universities continue to be caught betraying themselves.

The Cardinal Newman Society,
a Catholic higher education watchdog, reports almost daily on the worst
(and occasionally the best) that Catholic institutions offer. For
instance, Loyola Marymount University offers internships
with the openly pro-choice group Feminist Majority Foundation. Gloria
Steinem was hosted at St. Norbert College in Wisconsin, despite the objection
of the local bishop. In a recent and highly publicized case, Marquette
University is taking steps to fire a tenured professor who criticized
a “graduate student instructor who told a student not to oppose
same-sex marriage in her class.” Even Notre Dame has had its Catholic
identity questioned—and by the Washington Post, at that.

Lists like these are absurd, and rightly so. But they are just the
tip of the iceberg. A number of Catholic institutions engage in
deep-seated Progressive politics. “Diversity” offices, drag shows, and
programs—even entire courses—focusing on race, class, and gender are the norm.

More frustrating than all of this are the students, who themselves easily outdo administrators on the liberal spectrum and encourage
the abandonment of Loyola’s Catholic principles, all to the tune of
“social justice” or “Jesuit values”—which by definition must in line
with the greater church. Despite all of this, Loyola prides itself on
its “Jesuit, Catholic identity” and seems to believe that it affirms enough basic Catholic doctrine to retain the Catholic designation in its name.

Although every Catholic university peddles its “Catholic identity,”
such identity is almost meaningless. How can a university call itself
Catholic if it offers internships at pro-choice organizations? Or if it
punishes a professor for defending the Catholic teaching on marriage?

Dialogue Doesn’t Require Abandoning Reason or Morals

The fact is, doublespeak has become an epidemic at universities,
secular and Catholic alike. When a nebulous sense of “dialogue” is cited
(as it often is) to justify programs completely contrary to the values
of these institutions, the game is up; the rabbit hole was too tempting not to jump down. “Dialogue for me but not for thee” is a powerful master, and thus far it has been a dominating force for the culturati elite entrenched at most universities.

On paper, “dialogue” is an attractive proposition, especially
at a Catholic institution. The church has conceded that (capital T)
Truth can best be discovered through reasoned dialogue, reminiscent of
John Stuart Mill’s approach. Points and counterpoints, arguments, and
well-intentioned debate can uncover more Truth than top-down imposition
of a single viewpoint.

Now, in ironic fashion, the church hierarchy and Progressive
populists have switched places. Before Vatican II, the Catholic Church
was ambivalent, at best, about religious liberty and dialogue and
completely opposed to it, at worst. The post-Vatican II Church
encourages inter-religious dialogue and the exchange of ideas, especially in the university setting.
It is the progressives who crush the dissent. “Dialogue” is used and
abused in the Catholic university and has been for some time. Only one
view is allowed at Catholic universities, and rarely is it the Catholic
view.

Can Catholic Universities Ever Become Catholic Again?

Despite the mess that Catholic universities find themselves in,
reform of Catholic-American universities is a realistic possibility,
arguably more so than reforming the public university system. To begin
with, Church-university interaction is wound relatively tight. Bishops
generally have control over the universities in their diocese, barring
specific and complex Canon Law regulations. Ultimately, though,
universities are responsible to the Roman Curia, the Pope, and the
directives of Rome. But Rome is the end game, not the place where reform
starts.

Catholics can’t afford to sit on their laurels and wait for the
Vatican to step in and corral out of control institutions. Reform will
initially have to be a guerilla movement of students, parents, and
alumni working together to leverage universities from the inside and
outside. Two fronts, so to speak, have to be opened to pressure
administrators into reform.

Two groups offer good models to reform-minded individuals: RenewLMU and The Father King Society.
Both are grassroots movements aimed at protecting and promoting
Catholic identity at Loyola Marymount University and Georgetown
University, respectively (notably, The Father King Society was founded
by William Peter Blatty, a Georgetown alum and author of “The
Exorcist”). RenewLMU especially has a good combination of allies inside and outside the university:

RenewLMU is an alliance of students, alumni, faculty,
donors, and other LMU supporters who seek to strengthen LMU’s Catholic
mission and identity. LMU’s motto is ‘For the Greater Glory of God.’
The mission and the activities of LMU, its administration, faculty,
students, and staff should be centered around this very noble principle.

RenewLMU has made small but significant inroads, like helping to
launch pro-life programming on a campus devoid of a pro-life presence,
and the Father King Society has been successful in filing a canon
lawsuit with the Vatican over a collection of grievances at Georgetown.

Eventually, Rome will have to get involved in institutional reform
for deep-seated Progressive entrenchment to lift. Students and alumni
have only so much leverage, but Rome wields the authority needed to get
the job done.

Small inroads have been made here, as well: last year, the Vatican’s
Congregation of Catholic Education responded to a request to address a
drag show on the University of San Diego’s campus. Although they didn’t
address the issue head on, they did acknowledge
that “in light of the show and the scandal that it caused, this
congregation intends to act through administrative channels to the
competent ecclesiastical authority in San Diego.”

Catholic universities in America are a far cry from what they use to
be. The picture may be bleak, but Catholic education cannot afford to be
extinguished, especially in this country. Indeed, it will never be
completely extinguished. But its future is dubious and a pruning is in
order for Catholic-American universities. It is long overdue, but
renewal is in sight. Deo gratias for that.

Dominic
Lynch is an undergraduate student at Loyola University Chicago studying
political science with minors in history and international studies. He
is strongly interested in higher education news and his work has been
featured on the Drudge Report and The National Review Online.

This website is dedicated to a renewal of Christian culture. It is inspired by Sir Winston Churchill, a valiant defender of Christian civilization, who believed "we have a great treasure to guard; that the inheritance in our possession represents the prolonged achievement of the centuries." With Churchill, we believe that a "fraternal association" of the English-speaking peoples must "for their own safety and for the good of all walk together in majesty, in justice and in peace.”