I've been considering buying a reasonable entry level trike. The requirements are foldability, light weight, and comfort. Safety and stability during cornering and braking is fairly high on the agenda.

The trike would be used mainly for fitness & recreation on quiet, paved suburban roads and bike paths. It would be unlikely to be used off road or for touring and doesn't need to carry much of a payload. Speeds would be low to moderate. Distances would be maybe 40 km maximum per ride. It would be unlikely to be used in wet weather or for commuting in heavy traffic.

After a bit of research, I've narrowed it down to two possible choices. One is the Greenspeed GT3, the other is the Velotechnic Gekko. The Greenspeed I can get locally (Perth) whereas the Gekko only appears to be available over the net. Both suppliers appear to be quite reputable. All other things being equal, I'd prefer to support my LBS because of the convenience and service aspect.

Has anybody ridden either of these two models? What are the merits of each? Does one handle / ride better than the other?

Consider the Ice Adventure?Mind you if your going offroad I'd be changing the rear of the trike to an IGH of some sort. The hanger is VERY low to the ground and collects sticks very very easily. I had to stop 7 times over a 35km section of dirt and 5 of those times was in a section spanning 5km. I wasn't happy I tell you.

I'd call 'entry level' something that is half the price of the two models you've mentioned. In other words not 'quality'. And if you aren't using the trike much then paying 3 grand might be a waste. If what you're really considering is buying a trike that will be your one and only entry into the world of recumbent triking and you're already happy to pay $3000, maybe $4000 then there's lots of brands available in AU . Greenspeed, Trisled, Challenge, Optima, Hase, Catrike, HP Velotechnik, Logotrikes and a few other. You can get a TW Bents or Performer folding trike for $1500-$2000 with definitely 'entry level' quality and stocked in Perth.

And don't worry about the rear derailleur unless you seriously are taking your trike offroad. If you do you don't necessarily need an internal-geared hub to avoid gear damage, Shimano and other derailleur makers have taken notice and there are new derailleurs available with redesigned jockey wheels to keep the package tucked away. if only I could find my Shimano trade catalogue to find a model number ...

A cattrike villager by itself is $2310 from flyingfurniture, but with the options he has listed bumps it to $2710, the croozer cargo is $330 by itselfThen you have all the other bits and pieces he has.Trikes btw don't lose too much value when you sell them.

Thanks guys, I appreciate the feedback. The Catrike looks good but it doesn't fold.

Back to the topic: does anyone know the real difference in performance between the Greenspeed GT3 and the Gekko? Is there much separating the two? I've read the technical specs for each, but I'd be interested in hearing any personal opinions on either.

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:DH the greenspeed GT3 has 16" wheels all the way around and 16" is a pain in the butt so just a heads up there and they don't have bearings in the steer there bushes so again a heads up.

Ricky

Ah, of course! 16" vs 20". I should have picked that up. Thanks Ricky!

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:DH the greenspeed GT3 has 16" wheels all the way around and 16" is a pain in the butt so just a heads up there and they don't have bearings in the steer there bushes so again a heads up.

Ricky

Ah, of course! 16" vs 20". I should have picked that up. Thanks Ricky!

Your welcome DH and just so you know why I have said that I have ridden with a few greenspeed GT3 gents and they can't keep up with 20" but what they lack in mid range to high range is they can climb a mountain due to the low gearing but that low end isn't a very balanced set-up for all riding condition so hence my comment a pain in the butt. The other down side to 16" is an odd size you can get 20" wheel gear everywhere plus a great choice of tyres so in my opinion 20" is minimal no less.

}SkOrPn--7 wrote:Your welcome DH and just so you know why I have said that I have ridden with a few greenspeed GT3 gents and they can't keep up with 20" but what they lack in mid range to high range is they can climb a mountain due to the low gearing but that low end isn't a very balanced set-up for all riding condition so hence my comment a pain in the butt. The other down side to 16" is an odd size you can get 20" wheel gear everywhere plus a great choice of tyres so in my opinion 20" is minimal no less.

Who is online

About the Australian Cycling Forums

The largest cycling discussion forum in Australia for all things bike; from new riders to seasoned bike nuts, the Australian Cycling Forums are a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.