Available Case Documents

OPINION AND ORDER re: 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by The City of New York, Nilda Hoffman, Jessica McCrorie, Garfield Edmonds, Kevin Coleman, Salvatore Marchese. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of the Complain t is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims of sexual harassment and hostile work environment against Defendant Edmonds and GRANTED in all other respects. For ease of reference, the claims dismissed by this decision are: (i) retaliation under the Firs t Amendment and § 1983 (Count IV and XIII); (ii) failure to train and supervise under § 1983 (Counts VIII and IX); (iii) sexual harassment under § 1983 and New York state and city laws, as to Defendants Coleman, Hoffman and McRorie (Co unts X, XVI and XXI); (iv) retaliation under New York state and city laws, as to Defendants Coleman, Hoffman, McRorie and Edmonds (Counts XIX and XXIV); and (v) hostile work environment under § 1983 and New York state and city laws, as to Defend ants Coleman, Hoffman and McRorie (Counts XIV, XX and XXV). Claims that remain after this decision and Plaintiff's voluntary withdrawal of claims in connection with this motion are: (i) sexual harassment under § 1983 and New York state and city laws, as to Defendants Marchese and Edmonds (Counts X, XVI and XXI); (ii) retaliation under New York state and city laws, as to Defendant Marchese (Counts XIX and XXIV); and (iii) hostile work environment under § 1983 and New York state and city laws, as to Defendants Marchese and Edmonds (Counts XIV, XX and XXV). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 11. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/9/2014) (lmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.

The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.