This mobile menu is quite working yet! Your editor’s doing his best. Check out the desktop site for links and our long-overdue site search function.

Every week, The Commons mails newspapers to libraries and schools throughout Windham County, and beyond. Of course we do! Part of our mission is make sure that honest, award winning reporting is available to all, regardless of ability to pay.

Now you can help further our mission. Only $75 guarantees a library or school delivery of The Commons for a full year. Join our Sponsor-a-Library program today! Click here (and select “Sponsor a Library” when asked “Apply My Donation To.”)

Let’s talk advertising

We’d love to help you with your ads! Please let us know a little bit about your advertising and your needs, and one of our team will be in touch promptly. You can also call Jen at 802-246-6397 Monday–Friday, 10 a.m.–3:30 p.m.

Regular ad features

Help Wanted

Real Estate

Nuts ’n’ Bolts (home improvement)

Public Notices (Legal Ads)

Front Page Box

Section Cover Strip Ads

CLOSE

More than a newspaper

The Commons is the public face of a larger nonprofit organization, Vermont Independent Media, Inc.

We came to life from the ground up in 2004, as members of the community became increasingly concerned about the consequences of absent corporate ownership of the daily newspaper in town and the need for local people to have access to the skills to create their own grassroots media.

VIM came to life lovingly and carefully thanks to indefatigable volunteers. The first public programs of the Media Mentoring Project began in 2005, and the first issue of The Commons was published in 2006. The newspaper was published monthly until 2010, when we began a weekly schedule. We are published on Wednesdays 51 times a year.

Our mission

Recognizing that a vigorous exchange of ideas and information allows democracy to function and is the lifeblood of a community, Vermont Independent Media:

• creates a forum for community participation,

• promotes local independent journalism,

• fosters civic engagement by building media skills

through publication of The Commons and commonsnews.org, and through the Media Mentoring Project.

Nonprofit IRS filings

By law, every 501(c)3 nonprofit organization must make its IRS filings available to the public. Here are ours.

Office hours

We attempt to keep our small newsroom open during the day on weekdays. But we are sometimes out covering the news, many of us are part-time, and we keep odd hours. We welcome your visit, but please make an appointment so you don't make a special trip.

Directions to the office

We're at 139 Main St., Brattleboro, Vermont (the Hooker-Dunham Building).

News

BRATTLEBORO—Visitors to Sweet Pond State Park in Guilford might not be allowed to swim in the pond this summer.

Ethan Phelps, regional manager for the Vermont Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation (FPR), told an audience of Windham County residents at a March 24 public meeting that a 1920s-era dam holding back the equivalent of 18 acres of water is unstable.

Phelps also said that the dam’s spillway is deficient. As a result, the dam has received a Poor Condition and High hazard rating from state engineers.

“Older dams aren’t built to the same standards as today’s [dams],” said Steve Bushman, an engineer with the state’s Dam Safety Section, in a later interview.

Engineers gave Sweet Pond Dam a High hazard rating based on the potential loss of life, dwellings, or infrastructure, such as water treatment plants or railroads, if the dam breaks, said Bushman.

Bushman said that the two dam-break analyses that the engineers performed showed the potential for significant risk for people and houses downstream.

The “sunny day” analysis, which studies the damage of a normal water level in the pond, revealed that three downstream residences would be “inundated” with water. The ”storm day” analysis reviewed the worst-case scenario — such as a flood — in which water would damage at least six residences.

The Long Range Management Plan (LRMP) for Sweet Pond State Park states that the dam’s safety rating over the past few years has bounced between Fair and Poor, despite extensive repairs from 1986 to 1988.

As a result, the Sweet Pond Dam has replacement or removal in its future, Phelps told the audience.

Phelps told the audience that it is too early to guess at the cost of replacing the dam, but he said that replacing it would cost about five times more than removing the structure. The LRMP lists an estimate of $300,000 to repair the current dam.

Audience members asked about funding a new dam through stimulus funds, grants, or donations.

Phelps said that American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds can’t be used for capital improvement projects like the dam.

Marie Levesque Caduto, watershed coordinator for Vermont, added that a lot of funding for dam removal is available, but none for replacement, that she’s aware of.

District forester Tim Morton said that the long-range plan for the dam is vague at this point, because the department and engineers are still deciding how to proceed.

But he understands that without the dam, the park won’t be Sweet Pond.

Whether the dam is ultimately repaired, replaced, or removed, Phelps said that the next step for Sweet Pond is either lowering its water level or draining the pond. Once the department decides its course of action on the dam, it would proceed quickly and not allow the aging structure to “just sit there.”

As a result, there probably won’t be swimming in the pond this year, Phelps said, as the audience groaned.

Phelps said that the dam’s rating doesn’t mean the dam will let loose or is unsafe. Engineers have suggested that FPR lower the water level to decrease the threat to the residences situated downstream.

The proposals to lower the water level or drain the pond met with a fervent “no” from many of the Guilford residents in attendance. Sweet Pond is one of two bodies of water in the town and, according to one resident, the only public swimming hole.

The Department of Fish and Wildlife also maintains Guilford’s other lake, Weatherhead Hollow Pond. According to the Guilford town website, swimming is not allowed there.

Other plans slated for the 100acre Sweet Pond State Park include clearing dead trees that could fall and break headstones in the Franklin Cemetery, and dismantling an old summer house on the property when the current tenant vacates the building.

FPR will have a 30-day written feedback period for the LRMP. Send comments to Rick White, Vermont Department Of Forests, Parks and Recreation, 100 Mineral St., Suite 304, Springfield, VT 05156-3168 or to rick.white@state.vt.us.

To read the LRMP, visit the Vermont Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation’ website: www.vtfpr.org.

Like what we do? Help us keep doing it!

We rely on the donations and financial support of our readers to help make The Commons available to all. Please join us today.

Editor’s note: Our terms of service require you to use your real names. We will remove anonymous or pseudonymous comments that come to our attention. We rely on our readers’ personal integrity to stand behind what they say; please do not write anything to someone that you wouldn’t say to his or her face without your needing to wear a ski mask while saying it. Thanks for doing your part to make your responses forceful, thoughtful, provocative, and civil. We also consider your comments for the letters column in the print newspaper.

Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/pagestart.inc:142) in /home/commons/public_html/site/sitenext/helpers/comments/frontend/index.php on line 15