Comments on: 06/11/10 Deeeerangedhttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50
Mon, 06 Jun 2016 05:11:59 +0000http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2hourly1By: Salamuraihttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-32
SalamuraiMon, 14 Jun 2010 02:20:47 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-32@Ken - She knows words and makes sounds but doesn't <i>talk</i> so "doesn't" is more sensical.
But considering that all the animals in the strip talk, what does it matter?@Ken – She knows words and makes sounds but doesn’t talk so “doesn’t” is more sensical.

But considering that all the animals in the strip talk, what does it matter?

]]>By: Kevin Moorehttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-29
Kevin MooreSun, 13 Jun 2010 15:21:08 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-29Homer Simpson Is not real, he is just an actor.Homer Simpson Is not real, he is just an actor.
]]>By: Toby Bartelshttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-27
Toby BartelsSun, 13 Jun 2010 02:26:21 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-27@ Frank:
But that's not canon.
Really, it just shows that the <em>actor</em> can speak, not that the <em>character</em> can speak. It's amazing how ready people are to identify cartoon characters with the actors who portray them.
Compare the <a href="http://www.baldwinpage.com/madgesdiary/subletter.html" rel="nofollow">character Madge</a>, who is played by <a href="http://baldwinpage.com/sheptypes/006/index.html" rel="nofollow">an actor named Alexandria</a>. Obviously not the same person at all, see?@ Frank:

But that’s not canon.

Really, it just shows that the actor can speak, not that the character can speak. It’s amazing how ready people are to identify cartoon characters with the actors who portray them.

]]>By: Frankhttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-26
FrankFri, 11 Jun 2010 22:58:01 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-26@Ken: Once when Chris was short on time (he was moving if I remember correctly), he did a week where Dee talked, saying she was "helping him with the chores" (can't find the link, though). So I think that pretty much rules out the "can't speak" theory.@Ken: Once when Chris was short on time (he was moving if I remember correctly), he did a week where Dee talked, saying she was “helping him with the chores” (can’t find the link, though). So I think that pretty much rules out the “can’t speak” theory.
]]>By: Frankhttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-25
FrankFri, 11 Jun 2010 21:54:10 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-25@Ethan: Maybe you're thinking of <i>Back to the Future</i>.
"How are you doing Mr. Klein?"
"Why are you calling me Mr. Klein?"
"It's your name, isn't it? Calvin Klein? It's all over your clothes."@Ethan: Maybe you’re thinking of Back to the Future.
“How are you doing Mr. Klein?”
“Why are you calling me Mr. Klein?”
“It’s your name, isn’t it? Calvin Klein? It’s all over your clothes.”
]]>By: Ethanhttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-24
EthanFri, 11 Jun 2010 14:44:03 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-24I'm pretty sure I've seen the joke about 'Fruit of the Loom' done before, almost verbatim. But I forget where.I’m pretty sure I’ve seen the joke about ‘Fruit of the Loom’ done before, almost verbatim. But I forget where.
]]>By: Sensei Kenhttp://www.littledee.net/?p=50&cpage=1#comment-23
Sensei KenFri, 11 Jun 2010 10:18:31 +0000http://www.littledee.net/?p=50#comment-23I always wondered: Was it that Dee DOESN'T speak or COULDN'T speak?I always wondered: Was it that Dee DOESN’T speak or COULDN’T speak?
]]>