The information contained in this article is key, because it contains the nexus between the anthrax attack and the 9/11 attack. Keep in mind that the anthrax attack took place after 9/11, which means, following the government’s own conspiracy theory, the alleged hijackers were all dead. But I would say the mistake is to assume that what we’ve been told about 9/11 was true and that there were indeed hijackers.

Like I’ve said over and over, if the anthrax attack was an inside job – which it was pursuant to the government itself – and if it was nexused with 9/11, then how was 9/11 not an inside job?

I believe that when all the information is collected and amalgamated, the only scenario that makes sense is the alleged hijackers were patsies and that the planes were remotely piloted drones.

This article tells us that one of the targets that was hit by anthrax in Florida was a building occupied by a media publication edited by a man whose wife rented apartments to the alleged hijackers. The government calls it a big “coincidence”. If it wasn’t a “coincidence”, then there’s a problem – a major problem.

False flag (or black flag) describes covert operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried out during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation. Geraint Hughes uses the term to refer to those acts carried out by "military or security force personnel, which are then blamed on terrorists." See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag

Search for:

I have had questions about 9/11 for quite some time. I have been active in politics for almost 25 years. I have counted myself as a conservative Republican going back to when I was in high school, even having volunteered for Republican campaigns, and that was in 1994. So I have no natural animosity for Republicans or the Bush administration. (My political epiphany that led me away from the Republican Party and to libertarianism came in 1999.)

As one who has held the Series 3 license, having a background in finance, I have been active in raising important economic issues because I care about my fellow countrymen. In all of the work I have done on behalf of everybody's freedom and prosperity, only briefly did I ask for contributions, but have received none. Not only have I never received contributions, I have donated to veteran causes even at times I was making below the poverty line.

Prosperity preachers ask for contributions to sell people a false Gospel. Political candidates and politicians solicit contributions when all those candidates and politicians plan to do is undermine our freedom and the economy. Therefore, I don't believe I am asking too much to ask for your support. But I don't ask for contributions. I just ask that you support this site by making purchases through the Store.

Your support will enable me to keep this website up and running. The more support I receive, the more I can promote 9/11 truth. If this site generates any significant amount of funds, I will use it to purchase billboards and other advertising. Exposing 9/11 truth is the key to restoring our country to its founding principles, as well as extricating the United States from military confrontation around the world, which would benefit not just me, but you and many others around the world.

I am fighting for you. If you want me to keep up the fight, then I ask you to support this site by purchasing items from the Store.