>Otherwise I agree with Luciano: like the achievement of bourgeois
>literaure, the acheivements are bourgeois law--and therea re real
>achievements--are a precious heritage, worthy of presevation. Also, of
>coursem develkopment.
>>--Justin
>
Funny Marxist! When classes are abolished and the state dissapears (is
abolished by the "withering away process" - and that is the aim of Marxism -
where will law (bourgeois or proletariat) would stand?
If you want to preserve the edifice of bourgeois law under the laughauble
and absurd - from the point of view of the proletariat, since bourgeois law
EMBODIES the rule of that class over the proletariat - why not preserve the
bourgeois state? It is only by means of the bourgeois state that bourgeois
law can PRESERVED AND DEVELOPED!.
No wonder people like you - worshippers of every REPRESSIVE achievement of
the ruling classes (for that in a nut shell is "the law" under class
society) - show such a concentrated and undisguised hatred for the
revolution.
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
------------------