Are the Wikileak Hackers Actually American White-Hat Patriots?

In recent weeks the “DC Leaks” hackers involved with Wikileaks unleashed a successful and sophisticated operation into cracking the emails of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee. They have also managed to work around the controlled media gatekeepers. This also seems to be mostly, or even exclusively, about revealing the truth.

Now comes word that a treasure drove of George Soros’ material is forthcoming. Here are Soros’ Open Society Foundation leaks so far. In addition, ZATO (Zionist Atlantic Treaty Orgainization) emails appear to be hacked, including General Breedlove. More on this player is offered by Der Spiegel in this article. It’s a significant development and points to something major — and dare I say hopeful — in the works that goes far beyond the faux political campaign. “DC Leaks” Twitter can be followed here. Wikileaks in unblemished form comes directly from the source here.

The (((usual suspects))) and their hacks have tried to place this operation at the feet of the Russians.

Although the question of cui bono might point to Russian involvement, I have another glass-half-full explanation. Could it in actuality be the handiwork of American First white-hat patriots who are tired and angry about the hijacking of American foreign policy and politics by Trotskyite neocons?

As I have reported on these events over the last several years, I have constantly asked, “Where are the good guys?” Consider that many patriotic top-ranking military and intelligence officers and officials have been purged, especially under Obama. A synopsis on the military side can be gleaned here. Do these individuals just go out to pasture and play golf? Many are middle-aged, no longer personally ambitious and have the motivation to save the country and stop current trends. They also have the skills and contacts to do it.

I can only speculate about the role of Julian Assange in this. Sometimes it is good to leave some things unsaid, except to pray he stays alive. But there is no doubt about the plans, open intimidation and intent of the (((usual neocohen suspects))). TIME senior correspondent (((Michael Grunwald))) calls for a drone strike on Assange. Is this considered acceptable behavior at TIME magazine? What a lowlife.