God is our help, not “a burden”

Sir Julian Huxley (one of the great pillars of modern
neo-Darwinism) may be a symbol of people who feel God is a burden because he
wrote: “The God hypothesis . . . is becoming an intellectual and moral burden on our thought."
Therefore, he concluded that "we must construct something to take its
place. (Essays of a Humanist, Julian
Huxley, New York: Harper and Row, 1964, p. 222) He even described evolution as
a "Religion Without Revelation"
and wrote a book with that title (2nd edition, 1957). And evolution theory
became a part of the curriculum, and many thought this is science.

But
nature has its ways of repaying (Galatians 6:7). Global warming is sounding a
death knell on the Theory of Evolution:

1) The
much publicized natural selection is NOT going to happen in the case of many fishes
in the sea. (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/climate-change-study-ocean-fish-size/) Fish won’t be able to get
enough oxygen to grow if ocean waters keep heating up. Fish, as cold-blooded animals, cannot
regulate their own body temperatures. When ocean waters become warmer, a fish’s
metabolism accelerates, and it needs more oxygen to sustain its body functions.
Fish breathe through gills, organs that extract dissolved oxygen from the water
and excrete carbon dioxide.

Thus
both sea and climate are going to disprove Evolution Theory and its main
subject Natural Selection by making it obvious that species can’t adapt
according to the changing environment. Then the mankind will come to know that God
is our help (not a burden) and only He can recreate 8.7 million species to start the
new world again. (Revelation 21:1, 5)

Venus - You and your BK cult cronies are absolutely clueless about how evolution works despite numerous attempts to educate you. That is called wilful ignorance.

No species tries and fails to adapt to changing environments. Either a population contains the necessary genetic resources to deal with change or they don't. In the case of fish facing the challenge of warming oceans those individuals who are genetically disposed to be smaller and therefore consume less oxygen will be better suited to the change in climate. On average they will produce more offspring who survive long enough to reproduce and therefore the genes for smaller phenotypes will prosper in the gene-pool. If the environment changes to much or too rapidly then species become extinct.

Five times in the history of life over 90% of all life on earth became extinct due to rapid changes in the environment - and that was before humans existed. Life survived and recovered. All of life on earth today descended from the 4% species that survived the "Great Dying" of the Permian Extinction 250 million years ago.

These events prove the fact of evolution and natural selection to be beyond all doubt.

In all my
posts and comments, it is too obvious that I have not promoted any
organization. I have implied only four major subjects through all my writings:

1)Soul
is the creator of the body,

2) God is the creator of the world.

3)Suffering
is a mechanism that alerts us to avoid further/future pain. Thus pain tells us
that we have put our survival onto something that is a violation of some
principle of divinity, which in turn gives a thirst for God, the forgotten
truth. Like in rainy season we thirst for summer, and in summer we thirst for
rainy season.

4)How
to live in the now, and enjoy the present.

Nobody can
find fault with the above four things. The basic rule of the psychic universe
is that “like attracts like.” Similarly, “love promotes love,” so that the
person who has let go of a lot of inner negativity is surrounded by loving
thoughts, loving events, loving people, and loving pets. This phenomenon
explains many scriptural quotations and common sayings that have puzzled the
intellect, such as, “The rich get richer and the poor get poorer,” and “Those
who have, get.” As a general rule, therefore, people who are carrying the
consciousness of apathy bring poverty circumstances into their lives, and those
with a prosperity consciousness bring abundance into their lives. Because all
living things are connected on vibrational energy levels, our basic emotional
state is picked up and reacted to by all life forms around us. It is well known
that animals can instantly read a person’s basic emotional state. There are
experiments demonstrating that even the growth of bacteria is affected by human
emotions, and that plants register measurable reactions to our emotional state.
Hence don’t keep any ill-feeling towards me.

I can find fault with numbers 1,2, and 3. If you can't see that anybody would find fault with them, perhaps you have a rafter in your eye preventing you from seeing things. Sounds just as blind and culty as the JW baloney we all left behind.

Living in the now and enjoying the present is good though. After all, it's all we have.

Your finding fault with number 1, 2, and 3 is not eternal because I was like you to start with. I had freedom to choose religion because my dad was Jew and mom was a Christian, but I did not; I felt the way you did. Later, Life took me to those three; and I feel good about it. My initial stage made the present more fortified.

3) Suffering is a mechanism that alerts us to avoid further/future pain. Thus pain tells us that we have put our survival onto something that is a violation of some principle of divinity, which in turn gives a thirst for God, the forgotten truth. Like in rainy season we thirst for summer, and in summer we thirst for rainy season.

Blimey O'Rielly. mate. this is getting more bonkers. False dichotomy or what!

4) How to live in the now, and enjoy the present.

According to the dangerous Brahma Kumaris nutty cult.

Nobody can find fault with the above four things.

No one would waste their breath. There is so much wrong with those four Brahma Kumaris pontifications that they render themselves redundant.

I for one am bored to death reading this nonsense. I'm outta here. Sorry Venus and Brahma Kumaris people...I'm abandoning all your culty threads and won't look at any replies one of you might put. Cheers me dears.

You see dubstepped commented (before you) he liked the 4th
one but hated 1-3 whereas you hate all four of them. If Descartes (great Mathematician and philosopher) were here, he would have said He liked three of them, at least. This is the beauty of
life. Certain things are like time—it looks short during happiness and longer
during a wait/pain. Everyone’s taste is different. When we permit little space
around them, everyone is comfortable. Just like hating all those four makes you
feel comfortable, loving them all four makes me comfortable.