Monday, September 28, 2009

India is the country that is spoken of most often as an enemy in China, a British newspaper reported Sunday, but quoted a retired Chinese officer as saying the men serving the People's Liberation Army (PLA) have no “devotion”.

“Compared with our last war against India in 1962, our equipment is much better.

In an article on the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic, the paper said the occasion is set to be marked by the “grandest martial parade in the history of modern China”, with displays of a new generation of fighters, ballistic missiles, battle tanks and rifles.

“Thursday's parade is certain to provoke an outpouring of virulent nationalism. Curiously, the enemy most often spoken of is India,” the paper said.

Censors, otherwise draconian in their grip over Chinese netizens, permit “alarmingly frank discussion” on the internet on going to war against India over Tibet.

China's People's Daily newspaper declared Friday: “We must abide by (former Chinese leader) Deng Xiaoping's instructions that China must be under the leadership of the Communist Party.

Investigative mythologist and author William Henry talked about the significance of the art and symbols in the U.S. Capitol. The Capitol was thought of as a recreation of Solomon's Temple by its builders, Freemasons, who conceived of the building as a "beehive" buzzing with energy, he said. Higher wisdom flows through the Capitol's spiritual imagery, particularly in the painting, The Apotheosis of Washington (see images below), which is featured in the dome of the Rotunda, he shared, adding that the dome of the Capitol is a mirror image of the one in the Vatican. The painting depicts the first President as a deified being along with five pagan gods who are symbols for alchemy.

He noted that a scene in Dan Brown's new bestseller, The Lost Symbol, features a character staring up into the Capitol dome and seeing the painting transform into a gateway. This imagery shares similarities to Henry's work into stargates or portals, which he believes humans can ascend to higher consciousness. The bell-shaped Capitol Dome could be thought of as a kind of stupa that creates a vortex or field of energy, he continued.

Interestingly, Henry detailed that the Capitol contains a "crypt", one story beneath the Rotunda. It has 40 columns and was modeled after the ancient Temple of Poseidon-- this was a way for the United States to pay homage to Atlantis, he commented.

In theatres starting November 13th in NYC (Village East Cinema) and November 25th in LA (Laemmle Sunset 5)www.theendofpoverty.com

The feature-length documentary The End of Poverty? won critical acclaim at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival and is narrated by actor Martin Sheen. It is a daring, thought-provoking and very timely documentary by filmmaker Philippe Diaz. The film takes a hard look at world poverty and challenges capitalism and the American way. In a world of plenty, why are so many families around the planet still living in abject poverty? Looking beyond the popular "solutions" for poverty, The End of Poverty? asks if the true causes of poverty today stem from a deliberate orchestration of resource misallocation started in colonial times.

" ... The above core minimum obligations were devised by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 1990 after neo-liberal States pursuing globalization ignored the human rights of the poor in past human rights instruments and created under classes around the world.

It is apparent that these core minimum obligations were excluded in the above Optional Protocol because they were seen by the UN and the global elites as incompatible with neo liberalism and globalization. These core minimum obligations include the right to shelter, freedom from hunger, the right to water and basic health and education and very largely affect the most disadvantaged.

It is moment of truth for the United Nations regarding the above Optional Protocol’s interpretation of the UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which excludes these core minimum obligations. The UN must decide whether the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN Charter are to prevail over neo liberalism and globalization or whether the latter are to be permitted to dominate which will be the case if the Optional Protocol comes into force after 10 States sign and ratify it.

Any exclusion of the core minimum obligations could backfire on the human rights establishment as it is likely to be very difficult for liberal democratic States to justify increasing State control because of terrorism when the latter could claim to be fighting for justice – ‘rebellion against tyranny and oppression’ - for the poor by having the excluded core minimum obligations included in international human rights law.In the preamble the UDHR states: “Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law”.

There seems little doubt that if the OP is not revisited, even at this very late stage, and core minimum obligations included the poor will look to other belief systems to achieve justice. Fundamentalist groups such as Al Qaida and the Taleban show, irrespective of what you may think of their beliefs and/or methods, that it is not so much military and/or economic might that matters the most but rather the strength of one’s beliefs which allows such groups to overcome seemingly overwhelming odds. In recent times America realized the importance of keeping to its liberal beliefs - it major compromises of the latter i.e. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, resulted in a considerable loss of global legitimacy. The UN may also face a considerable loss of global legitimacy with the exclusion of core minimum obligations. ... "

Oscar-winning filmmaker Roman Polanski has been arrested in Switzerland on a decades-old arrest warrant stemming from a sex charge in California, Swiss police said Sunday.

Polanski, 76, was taken into custody trying to enter Switzerland on Saturday, Zurich police said. A spokesman for the Swiss Justice Ministry said Polanski was arrested upon arrival at the airport.

He has lived in France for decades to avoid being arrested if he enters the United States and declined to appear in person to collect his Academy Award for Best Director for "The Pianist" in 2003.

The director pleaded guilty in 1977 to a single count of having unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, acknowledging he had sex with a 13-year-old girl. But he fled the United States before he could be sentenced, and U.S. authorities have had a warrant for his arrest since 1978.

(NaturalNews) Previously secret documents that surfaced at a Vioxx court case in April of this year reveal pharmaceutical giant Merck maintained a "hit list" of doctors to be "neutralized" for speaking out against Vioxx. Although this story was reported on NaturalNews and other sites in April, Merck's involvement in the recent round of swine flu vaccines raises new questions regarding Merck's behavior towards its critics (see below).

As was reported in The Australian, documents that have surfaced in the Federal Court in Melbourne expose the criminal intent of Merck staffers who admitted they intended to "stop funding to institutions" and "interfere with academic appointments." (These actions are highly illegal, by the way.)

According to on-the-record testimony in this Australian trial, one Merck employee said, in referring to the doctors on the hit list, "We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live..."

Dr. Weeks’ Comment: This is highly predictable but reckless since mercury is a KNOWN neurotoxin andH1N1 “pandemic” is only postulated. If you get vaccinated, ascertain the lot number of the vaccine and have your doctor sign this form

From the Washington State Department of Health - notice 9-24-09

Mercury limits law temporarily suspendedSecretary of Health Mary Selecky has temporarily suspended Washington’s limit on the amount of mercury (thimerosal) in H1N1 (swine flu) vaccine allowed for pregnant women and children younger than three years old. The six-month suspension is effective September 23, 2009 through March 23, 2010 and applies only to H1N1 vaccines. It does not apply to seasonal flu vaccine.

As a precaution, Washington state law limits the amount of mercury that can be in vaccines for pregnant women and children under three. The secretary of health can suspend the law when there is a shortage of vaccine or during a disease outbreak– both criteria apply to the H1N1 vaccine. Some H1N1 vaccine will be mercury-free, but it may not be available at all times and there may be limited amounts. This could stop children younger than three and pregnant women who want the vaccine from getting it. H1N1 vaccination will be voluntary. Pregnant women and children under three are two of the priority groups to get H1N1 vaccine first because they are at high risk for serious complications if they’re infected with H1N1 (swine flu) virus.

Notification requirementsIt is important to note that when the mercury limits are suspended, the law requires that certain groups be told they are getting a vaccine containing more mercury than is usually permitted. This notification requirement applies to pregnant or lactating women and parents or guardians of children under the age of 18 getting the vaccine. There is no single notification method required; the Department of Health has developed a sample notification form to help you with this. There is also a chart that you can use providing guidance on screening patients to determine who needs to be notified. The notification form and other information on the temporary suspension of the mercury limits for H1N1 vaccine are available online (http://www.doh.wa.gov/cfh/immunize/providers/h1n1-thimerosal.htm).

Over the past week U.S. newspapers and television networks have been abuzz with reports that Washington and its NATO allies are planning an unprecedented increase of troops for the war in Afghanistan, even in addition to the 17,000 new American and several thousand NATO forces that have been committed to the war so far this year.

The number, based on as yet unsubstantiated reports of what U.S. and NATO commander Stanley McChrystal and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen have demanded of the White House, range from 10,000 to 45,000.

Fox News has cited figures as high as 45,000 more American soldiers and ABC News as many as 40,000. On September 15 the Christian Science Monitor wrote of "perhaps as many as 45,000."

The similarity of the estimates indicate that a number has been agreed upon and America's obedient media is preparing domestic audiences for the possibility of the largest escalation of foreign armed forces in Afghanistan's history. Only seven years ago the United States had 5,000 troops in the country, but was scheduled to have 68,000 by December even before the reports of new deployments surfaced.

An additional 45,000 troops would bring the U.S. total to 113,000. There are also 35,000 troops from some 50 other nations serving under NATO's International Security Assistance Force in the nation, which would raise combined troop strength under McChrystal's command to 148,000 if the larger number of rumored increases materializes.

As the former Soviet Union withdrew its soldiers from Afghanistan twenty years ago the New York Times reported "At the height of the Soviet commitment, according to Western intelligence estimates, there were 115,000 troops deployed." [1]

Nearly 150,000 U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan would represent the largest foreign military presence ever in the land.

Rather than addressing this historic watershed, the American media is full of innuendos and "privileged" speculation on who has leaked the information and why, as to commercial news operations the tawdry world of Byzantine intrigues among and between American politicians, generals and the Fourth Estate is of more importance that the lengthiest and largest war in the world.

One that has been estimated by the chief of the British armed forces and other leading Western officials to last decades and that has already been extended into Pakistan, a nation with a population almost six times that of Afghanistan and in possession of nuclear weapons.

Two weeks ago the Dutch media reported that during a visit to the Netherlands "General Stanley McChrystal [said] he is considering the possibility of merging...Operation Enduring Freedom with NATO's ISAF force." [2] That is, not only would he continue to command all U.S. and NATO troops, but the two commands would be melded into one.

The call for up to 45,000 more American troops was first adumbrated in mid-September by U.S. armed forces chief Michael Mullen, with the Associated Press stating "The top U.S. military officer says that winning in Afghanistan will probably mean sending more troops."

" ... An important amount of the reflection contained in BERRAISMS is about the inner contradictions of knowledge, more precisely, of understanding in the sense of classical rationalist philosophy:

YOU CAN OBSERVE A LOT JUST BY WATCHING

YOU CAN SEE A LOT BY OBSERVING

The logia fluctuates here, but in that case, both versions provide the same level of philosophical dept. Strongly influenced by scholarly thought, the doctrine of knowledge of modern culture tends to value the virtues of practical experimentation over simple contemplative observation. That orientation in the tradition is rooted in DESCARTES and the Cartesian continuation. But in 18 th century, DIDEROT and a series of materialist philosophers called the naturalist materialists tried to demonstrate that strict observation, if performed with no prejudice. could supersede experimentation, specially if that one is biased by a priori conceptualizations and prejudices, of the type of the one DESCARTES and his disciples had a tendency to entertain. Furthermore, in certain sciences, for example astronomy, observation was the only procedure of apprehension available. Here, fundamentally in the debate between DESCARTES and DIDEROT on the activity of knowledge, Yogi opts for the ideas put forward by DIDEROT, the naturalist materialist, who analyzed in detail the virtues of simple observation with the senses. This is solidly in objection with the Cartesianist position that lionizes the virtues of experimentation over mere observation. The conscience of objecting to a dominant idea is present in the tone of the aphorism. Yogi speaks here, knowing that he is not saying something everybody will spontaneously agree with. But as a good catcher always knows, the virtues of simple observation of every corners of the field are to be reconsidered in modern culture. The tremendous capacity of millions of fans, gathered since almost a century in stadiums big as canyons, to focus their attention and cognitive activity on the arabesques of a flying object of the size of a fist tends to support such an opinion!

[ ... ]

ITS TOUGH TO MAKE PREDICTIONS, SPECIALLY ABOUT THE FUTURE

Here comes dialectics. Stop to laugh and face the flat logical consequences of that aphorism: predictions can be done about something other than the future . Let try to understand that contradiction. First, prediction can be done about the past quite simply, as in Here he comes! I predict you that he will have forgotten to phone Mary . One may not think about it immediately, busy as one are laughing, but it is quite straightforward... and the easiest to do, according to Yogi. Now what about predictions about the present ? So contradictory! Well, let us try to understand the fact (painful for our common sense, but scientifically demonstrated by Einstein) that time varies when speed varies. The subjectivity of Yogi BERRA, as the one of any baseball player, lives the most intense peeks of its mental activity in an endless reiteration of brief instants . Between the moment the pitcher pitches and the moment you strike or catch, there is a short, so short distance that no, you cannot call that the future. And it is on that infinitesimal hiatus between two moments that the most intensive activity of prediction of a baseball batter or catcher is doomed to flourish. You eventually end up knowing for a flat objective fact, when your praxis develops itself in such a universe, that the present has absolutely no stability whatsoever, and that, contrarily to what common sense believes, prediction applies to it as well, because speed alterates time . Other than Einstein, only the antique Greek dialectician HERACLITUS expressed such a sharp consciousness of the fluency of the time process. Then, since that fundamentally fugitive present moment is already difficult to predict about, just imagine what the future, distant, tangled and complex as it appears from the home base, can be... "

There is a popular assumption asserted ad nauseam by our leaders in government, by our school text books and by our “mainstream” media that although many other countries don't have freedom of speech and freedom of assembly -- such as Iran or China -- we do, and it's what makes us so great. Anybody who has spent much time trying to exercise their First Amendment rights in the U.S. now or at any other time since 1776 knows first-hand that the First Amendment looks good on paper but has little to do with reality.

Dissent has never really been tolerated in the USA. As we've seen in recent election cycles even just voting for a Democratic presidential candidate and having your vote count can be quite a challenge -- as anyone who has not had their head in sand knows, Bush lost both elections and yet kept his office fraudulently twice. But for those who want to exercise their rights beyond the government-approved methods -- that is, their right to vote for one of two parties, their right to bribe politicians (“lobby”) if they have enough money, or their right to write a letter to the editor in the local Murdoch-owned rag, if it hasn't closed shop yet -- the situation is far worse.

Would any of these methods, and more, been considered too extreme to use against the Germans and the Japanese during WWII? Are any of these methods, to now include kidnapping for torture and targeted assassination, deemed too extreme for Americans to use to counter “terrorism?”

Are not the recipients of these “gifts” of American Manifest Destiny entitled to refuse them by whatever means necessary? Have they no rights but to say “yes” to their own subjugation, mutilation and murder? And are those unarmed, or those unable to reciprocate these “gifts” – civilians, the elderly, women and children – not entitled to have someone stand up and defend them? Do those with no voice or rights, like children and animals, deserve no consideration precisely because they are unarmed and unable to resist? Is the moral high ground to be found under the iron boot of tyranny? Must one turn the other cheek when it, too, will be eaten off your face?

The machine to be raged against, however, is not a machine. It is a sociopathic set of people. The system that enables the Fordism of death and destruction is a set of rules consciously created and administered by perhaps point-oh-one percent of the system’s most lavish recipients, enforced by its multi-millionare minions and held up to the rest of us as an inevitable law of nature, to which there is no alternative. And as we participate in this Great Game, we become the racket ball of the ultra rich, who have us inculcated, enticed, bribed and coerced into submission to their dominion.

These “people” are individual sociopaths without a shred of empathy for fellow beings, human or otherwise, who make the daily decision to crush the rest of us into the dirt under their feet. Everybody and everything below billionaire-level is “fair” prey for the vicious, ruthless, deliberate decision-makers who create a daily holocaust to serve their insatiable lust for power, a lust they themselves cannot, or will not, control. And like any bully, they bully – as if daring someone to stop them – until someone or something smacks them down. Since they lack the ability and/or will to control their murderous, sociopathic tendencies, they need someone else to create that discipline for them. Like giant, temper tantrum-throwing two-year-old tyrants, they need time out. And it’s our job to give it to them – by whatever means we can – to stop the murder they deliberately decide on, which only serves to fuel their insatiable lust.

They appear to be asking Earth to stop them in one giant, extinction event evoked by their bullying hubris, and in that event, take the rest of us along to the woodshed of failed evolutionary experiments. The only question left is will we go with them willingly, or will we put up a fight?

"... last spring the US Conference of Catholic Bishops announced that reiki - hailed by many as therapy, derided by others as quackery - would no longer be practiced in the church’s hospitals and retreat centers. Reiki, according to the bishops, is not grounded in science or Christianity and is therefore inappropriate for Catholic institutions.

Practitioners and clients claim that reiki (pronounced RAY-kee) reduces pain, stress, and anxiety; accelerates recovery from surgery and illness; and boosts the immune system. The church hierarchy begs to differ. “Without justification either from Christian faith or natural science, a Catholic who puts his or her trust in reiki would be operating in the realm of superstition, the no-man’s-land that is neither faith nor science,’’ according to the six-page guidelines. “Superstition corrupts one’s worship of God by turning one’s religious feeling and practice in a false direction.’’

Griseuk, who lives in Merrimack, N.H., read about the decision and chuckled. “It must have been a slow day at the Vatican,’’ says Griseuk, who was raised in the Catholic Church.

The following week she got a call from St. Joseph saying the hospital would no longer offer reiki. Griseuk had to close the seven-year-old volunteer clinic located at a wellness center associated with the hospital. “The bishops did not do their research,’’ she says. “Reiki is not a belief system, not a cult, not a weirdo thing.’’ ... "

Waste Reporting Formfilled and signed by Dr. Dekovand sent via email to the Inspector General of the USAon 21 September 2009,Section "Description":

I am a witness of the killing of the former Director of the CIAWilliam Colby. In 1996, the FBI Director Louis Freeh and the specialagent Johnson from the New Orleans office of the FBI, have killed theformer CIA Director William Colby. President Clinton has approved thekilling. Since 1996, the USA governments keep in secret the order ofPresident Clinton for the killing. President Clinton has ordered thesociety to be misled and the USA government to describe the killing asan accident. President Bush has repeated the same order. Finally,President Obama also has repeated the same order. President Clinton,President Bush and President Obama protect the killers and prevent thetruth about the killing to become public.

More details are available at the site devoted to the Ames-Colbystory:

http://d-memoirs.tripod.com/

Below is my letter of 30 July 2009 to the Minister of the ForeignAffairs of Bulgaria. The letter and the answer of the Ministry ofForeign Affairs of Bulgaria are available at the site devoted to theAmes-Colby story.

30 July 2009To Mrs. Minister of the Foreign Affairs of Bulgaria, Sofia

Dear Mrs. Minister,

I appeal for your assistance to obtain from the government of the USAthe status of a victim of criminal activity of the USA government.

On January 5, 1991, I was preparing myself to leave the USA withdocuments in order. I have bought a plain ticket to another country.At the airport of Philadelphia, PA, I was abducted by a group ofagents of the FBI of the USA. The FBI agents transported me by a plainto New Orleans, LA. A few days later I understood that the order forthe abduction has been given by Mr. Johnson, at that time special FBIagent in the FBI office in New Orleans and Director of Department ofthe FBI for the state Louisiana. Since January 5, 1991 to May 22,1992, that is, more than one year, I was a captive of the FBI in NewOrleans. The FBI prohibited me to leave New Orleans and to call toBulgaria or to the Bulgarian embassy in the USA. After the abduction,in January 1991, Mr. Johnson took my passport in order I to do nothave the possibility to travel. All this FBI activity was criminalactivity and a violation of the USA laws. In violation of the FBIorders, in March 1992 I succeeded to call to the Bulgarian embassy inthe USA. I explained to the officers of the embassy: "I am a captiveof the FBI in New Orleans, in violation of the laws of the USA. I amnot accused in any violation. I am abducted and a captive. The FBItook my passport in violation of the USA laws". A few days after mycall to the Bulgarian embassy, Mr. Johnson gave me back my passport.Mr. Johnson told me that my passport has been all the time in hispersonal safe. Mr. Johnson again prohibited me to leave the town. Hetold me that the FBI follows me and will arrest me and put me in thejail if I try to leave the town. The same statement I have heard manytimes from Mr. Johnson. On May 22, 1992, after one year and fourmonths captivity, finally I succeed to leave New Orleans. The nextday, May 23, 1992, I arrived at the Sofia airport, Bulgaria. Sincethat day I have not visited the USA and I have not asked to get a visafor the USA.

In 1991-1992, Mr. Johnson forced me I to work out a plan for killingof Mr. William Colby, a former Director of the CIA of the USA. Later,in 1996, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Louis Freeh, at that time the Director ofthe FBI of the USA, have used the plan in order to kill Mr. Colby. Iam not guilty for the preparation of the plan, since at that time Iwas a captive of the FBI of the USA, so that I was forced to executethe criminal orders, in order to can survive.

In 1994, I sent from Bulgaria a letter to President Clinton withdescription of crimes of Mr. Johnson. Unfortunately, the FBI DirectorMr. Louis Freeh has misled President Clinton that I had been FBIagent. Indeed, in 1992 to 2001, possibly to later, the FBI informationsystem contained such a file, but the fail has been complete, 100%falsification. The file is one of the FBI criminal actions against me,but also against the USA President, since in 1996 the FBI Director hasused the same file to mislead President Clinton so that PresidentClinton to approve the killing of Mr. William Colby. The aim of theFBI possibly has been to make President Clinton its hostage by makingfacts able to discredit him. I heard for first time about my file inMarch 1997 in the USA embassy in Sofia from Mr. Fogarty, an officer ofthe embassy. Later I saw some confirmations. In 2007, I sent a letterto President Bush containing a protest against the creation by the FBIof a completely false file about me.

I could notice that the activities of the USA government are not incorrespondence with the activities of other USA institutions. Forexample, the USA Senate does not like the killing of William Colby. InMay 2001, a group of a few USA Senators forced the FBI Director Mr.Louis Freeh to resign because of the killing of William Colby. Thereare also other actions against the criminal activity of the USAgovernment, from USA institutions, as well as US citizens. But theseactions by now are not public.

I have to notice that the USA government does not want to announcepublicly that President Clinton has ordered the killing of an Americancitizen - William Colby - without a trial and a sentence. Possibly,the USA government does not want to make a public announcement becausethe President Clinton's order is a crime. In accordance with the USAlaws, the USA President does not have the right to murder a USAcitizen. Unfortunately, the USA government has published and holds ona description of the William Colby's death which contradicts to mydescription. Because of this fact, some persons who are not familiarwith the facts, call into doubt my reputation of a honest person.Every time when my reputation is called in question, I suffer losses.Hence, I consider as a measure for clarifying of my name, the USAgovernment to confirm the truth of all my statements.

Because of the above, I consider the status of a victim of criminalactivity of the USA government as well-founded and well-grounded. Ihad and I continue to have losses because of the activity of the USAgovernment. The USA government did not have and does not have, neitherjuridical nor moral grounds for its actions. I appeal the USAgovernment to respect the facts and to grant me status of a victim ofcriminal activity of the USA government, together with all theconsequences of the status. I appeal the government of Bulgaria toprotect my rights of a Bulgarian citizen.

From the above letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bulgariaone could see that I was forced to participate in the killing ofWilliam Colby. Since 23 May 1992, I am in Bulgaria. I am outside ofthe control of the USA government and I am free to decide. Since 23May 1992, I am a witness for the preparation of the killing of WilliamColby. Since May 1996, I am a witness for the killing of WilliamColby.

It is unusual the USA government to involve into the killing of theDirector of the CIA of the USA a person, who is not a USA citizen.Also, it is unusual the USA government to give to this person theopportunity to live outside the USA, and to be outside the control ofthe USA government. That is, it is unusual the USA government to giveto this person the opportunity to be a witness of the killing and todescribe the killing into the Internet. In addition, many times duringmy captivity in the USA I have made the statement, that if I am freeto speak, I will unmask the killers. But this is the reality. The USAgovernment has to explain these facts. I had a few talks on thesequestions with different persons, familiar with the facts. Here I willnote one of my talks. In March 1997, I had a talk within the USAembassy in Sofia, Bulgaria, with Mr. Fogarty, at that time an officerin the embassy. Mr. Fogarty is familiar with the facts. Mr. Fogartytold me that his explanation is as follows: "The persons involved intothe killing of William Colby have an amazing absence ofprofessionalism." My personal explanation is more complicated. I willexplain my personal views when necessary. But the facts about amazingabsence of professionalism by the FBI are undoubted.

The fact that the killers left a witness of the killing and thewitness lives outside the USA, has made possible the killing to bedescribed in the Internet. If a witness is into the USA, he will notbe able to speak, because the FBI will stop him. Possibly, the FBI haskilled many people. Possibly, in other cases there is no a witness orthe witness is under the control of the USA government. But in thiscase there is a witness, and the witness is outside the control of theUSA government. This fact makes the case important.

During the years I have made many efforts the killing of William Colbyto become public. In 1994, I have described the plan for the killingof William Colby to persons in Bulgaria, including influential personsfrom the Bulgarian KGB and a leading Bulgarian politician. In 1994 and1995, I wrote a few manuscripts (5 or 6 manuscripts) about the Amesstory, which is the beginning of the Ames-Colby story. I havedisseminated these manuscripts to approximately 10 countries aroundthe world. Since December 2000, I have published a description of theAmes-Colby story in the Web. In 2001-2007, I have published parts ofthe Ames-Colby story as a sequence of Google postings - approximately10 postings from 2001 to 2007 (Google Groups, Search, "Dekov, Colby").In 2006, I created a special Web site devoted to the Ames-Colby story- the above quoted Web site. I plan to build mirror sites of this sitein the near future.

I have sent many letters - email letters, paper letters and faxes, tomany institutions and many persons around the world. I have sent asequence of email letters, with description of the killing of WilliamColby and with many topics related to the killing, to President Bush -approximately 100 letters, to President Obama - approximately 20letters, to all US Senators since March 2001 - approximately 2000letters, to all Attorneys General of the USA since 2001 -approximately 100 letters, to the Inspector General of the USA -approximately 100 letters, to the Supreme Court of the USA -approximately 50 letters, to Congressmen and Congresswomen of the USACongress, to private persons, newspapers, organizations for protectionof human rights and so on.

I have received many answers - possibly a few hundreds. All theseanswers express support for my efforts. But the USA officials rejectpublic trial against the killers. President Bush prohibited anypublicity of the killing. President Obama has repeated the order.

The US media (TVs, newspapers, and so on) are under the control of theoligarchy, that is, under the control of very reach people who insistto control the USA. The effort of the USA media to keep in secret thekilling of William Colby is a wonderful illustration. This fact makesthe situation very dangerous for the USA citizens, and also, verydangerous for the peace at the planet.

In my paper "The impact of the killing of William Colby on the 2008campaign for president of the USA", published on 23 August 2008, atthe Web site devoted to the Ames-Colby story, I noticed that from thefact that the USA government is able to keep the killing in secretfrom the USA society, it does not follow that the killers do not haveproblems. The description of the killing is published in the Web andthe governments of many countries know that it is true. In March andApril 2001, I sent via email the description of the killing to a fewUS Senators. I have received a few answers. As a result, a group of USSenators forced the FBI Director Louis Freeh to resign because of thekilling of William Colby. Mr. Freeh announced his resignation on 1 May2001 (I expect that the same is the date of the death of William Colby- 1 May, but 1996). On January 29, 2007, I sent the following letterto Hillary Clinton (the letter is available at the Web site devoted tothe Ames-Colby story):

January 29, 2007

Dear Senator Hillary Clinton,

You must make a public statement confirming that your husbandPresident Bill Clinton has ordered to the former FBI Director LouisFreeh to murder the former CIA Director William Colby.

I have sent you during the last years many times letters insisting youto confirm the murder of William Colby. You refused. Now you appealfor the post of the US President. I wish you success, but you mustconfirm the murder of William Colby and to appeal the guilty personsto go into the jail. (Please see the enclosed list of the guiltypersons). The President of the USA must be honest person who says thetruth. Today this is important for the future not only of the USA, butof the whole planet.

Your husband President Bill Clinton must make a clear public statementthat he has ordered the murder of William Colby. President Clintonmust clearly explain the reason for his order. It is well-known thatLouis Freeh suggested to President Clinton William Colby to bemurdered without a public trial. President Clinton must confirm thisfact and to accuse Louis Freeh. If your husband refuses to make apublic statement that he has ordered the killing of William Colby, youmust cancel your campaign for president.

I am a witness of the murder of William Colby. I can give lots of infoabout the murder. More info: http://d-memoirs.tripod.com/index.htm

I recommend you to use your position as a US Senator and to initiate acampaign for a new US law. The law must prohibit to US officials tomake false public statements. If a US official has made a false publicstatement, he/she must go into the jail. The reason a US official tomake a false public statement is always the same - the official wantsto receive illegal income or to conceal a bad work or a crime. TheAmes-Colby case is an excellent illustration - Louis Freeh decided tokill William Colby instead to accuse him officially, in order toprotect his position as FBI Director and to conceal the bad work andcrimes of a few FBI agents. The new law must ensure the most basicright of the US citizens - the right the citizens to protect theirrights against the abuses of the US government. Such a law would bethe basis of a new era for the USA and the whole planet - the era ofprosperity and stability.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

A list of guilty persons:

1.Johnson, FBI agent,Mr.Johnson was the Director of the Russian Department in the NewOrleans office of the FBI in 1990-1992. He is an organizer andexecutor of the killing.

2.Louis Freeh, former Director of the FBI, the main organizer andexecutor of the killing.

3.Robert Mueller,Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,Mr.Mueller uses his position to prevent any investigation of thekilling.

4.John Ashcroft, former Attorney General of the USA,Mr. John Ashcroft used his position to prevent any investigation ofthe killing.Mr. John Ashcroft decided to resign instead to accuse Louis Freeh.

5.Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the USAMr. Alberto Gonzales uses his position to prevent any investigation ofthe killing.

For questions:Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the USAU.S. Department of Justice950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530-0001Ask...@usdoj.gov

I have sent the above letter to Hillary Clinton and to all USSenators. I have received many answers from US Senators. I have notreceived any answer from Hillary Clinton. As result, in 2008 theleaders of Democrats eliminated Hillary Clinton from the 2008 campaignfor USA President because of her participation in the killing ofWilliam Colby. If today Barack Obama is the USA President, this factis mainly because of the elimination of Hillary Clinton by the leadersof Democrats, not because of the personal abilities of Mr. Obama.

I would like to notice here that the elimination of Hillary Clintonfrom the 2008 campaign for USA President was known in advance. On 18November 2007, I sent email letters to the USA ambassador in Sofia, aswell as to a few other ambassadors, including the ambassadors ofRussia and China in Sofia. I informed them that (I quote): "HillaryClinton will be eliminated from the 2008 campaign for USA President"because of her participation in the killing of William Colby. At thistime, in November 2007, Hillary Clinton was an indisputable favourite.In the letter I have informed the ambassadors that I plan to write anarticle devoted to the elimination of Hillary Clinton. The article ispublished at the Web site devoted to the Ames-Colby story. My letterto the ambassadors of 18 November 2007 is available upon request.Also, the reader may ask a copy of the letter from the Department ofState of the USA.

On June 5, 2006, I sent the following letter to the Supreme Court ofthe USA:

To the Supreme Court of the USA

June 5, 2006

Dear Sirs:

I appeal the Supreme Court of the USA to begin a criminal trialagainst Louis Joseph Freeh, the former FBI Director, for the killingof the former CIA Director William Egan Colby.

The Attorney General of the USA knows well the facts. The US AttorneyGeneral refuses to charge Louis Freeh. President Bush knows well thefacts. He refuses to charge Louis Freeh.

A few US Senators know the facts. At least one action is known. Mr.Freeh was forced to resign in May 2001 by a group of a few USSenators.

The former Attorney General Mr. John Ashcroft knows the facts. Hepreferred to resign.

The FBI and CIA Directors since 1996 know the facts, as well as a fewofficers. By the moment they prefer to conceal the crime.

A few foreign countries know the facts.

The International Criminal Court at Hague recorded the Colby case. In2005, a set of documents was presented to the International CriminalCourt at Hague concerning the killing of the former CIA of the USADirector William Colby by the FBI Director Louis Freeh.

The American society still does not know the facts.

The uninformed society cannot protect itself. The well informedsociety can take good decisions. Hence, the main loser is the USsociety, and hence the main loser is the USA country.

By a trial against Louis Freeh the Supreme Court of the USA willprotect the USA people and the USA country.

I am ready to contribute to the Supreme Court of the USA as a witness.If the US government decides to contribute to the Court, the trialwill end quickly - the US government has a complete set of evidences.If the US government refuses to contribute to the Court, there isstill one possibility - the Supreme Court of the USA could inviteforeign governments to contribute. At least ten foreign countries haveevidences, and at least five foreign countries have enough evidences.If the foreign governments refuse to contribute to the Court, thecrime still could be proven. The Court could invite citizens from afew countries.

On October 10, 2005, I sent my first letter to the Supreme Court ofthe USA. This is my second letter.

If the Supreme Court of the USA refuses to protect the law, the mainloser will be the American society and the USA country.

Best Regards,

Dr.Deko Dekov

http://www.dekovsoft.com/ddekov/

Dr.Deko DekovZahari Knjazheski 816000 Stara ZagoraBulgaria

I have noticed in the above letter to the Supreme Court of the USA:"The former Attorney General Mr. John Ashcroft knows the facts. Hepreferred to resign". Here I will not give details. I just will saythat Mr. John Ashcroft has the morality to resign. The other AttorneysGeneral did not have such morality.

In 2004, a US Senator wrote me (the letter is a paper letter and Ikeep it): "I understand your concerns regarding the case of WilliamColby. We cannot afford to sacrifice our nation's defining ideals ofliberty and justice for all." Justice for all. The USA governmentviolated this basic ideal in 1996 when the USA government has killedwithout a court trial and a sentence a USA citizen - William Colby.But many times bigger crime is the concealment of the crime by the USAgovernments - already 13 years continued saga of dishonour in whichstep by step have been involved more and more USA officials.

The killing of William Colby begins as a criminal murder of a USAcitizen by the USA government. But since 1996 the story is different.The President of the USA, the Attorney General of the USA, theInspector General of the USA and the directors of the FBI, CIA and theSecret Service act as an organized criminal group in order to preventthe truth about killing to become public. The organized criminal grouphas conducted criminal operations against USA citizens. PresidentBush has ordered these criminal operations. Today President Obamacontinues the criminal operations. The truth will become public andthe USA citizens will be surprised that even famous USA citizens,known to all Americans, are victims of these operations.

But the organized criminal group do not limit its operations withinthe USA. The organized criminal group conduct operations in othercountries. The organized criminal group conducted operations withinthe European Union. The governments of the countries-members of theEuropean Union, the European Parliament, the European Commission andthe citizens of the European Union have to be informed about thesecriminal operations, in order to can protect themselves.

During the last years US secret services and agencies, like FBI, CIAand Secret Service conduct hundreds criminal operations around theworld, aimed to keep in secret the killing of William Colby.

I appeal President Obama and the US Senate to stop all criminaloperations and to make public all the information about all crimesmade by the USA government. The USA citizens and the people at theplanet must know the truth.

Below is my letter to President Obama of 18 July 2009. The letter ispublished at the Web site devoted to the Ames-Colby story.

July 18, 2009Dear President Obama,

I appeal you to make the following public statement:

"The USA government has killed the former CIA Director William Colbybecause of an order by President Clinton. Many years many people attop positions in the USA government have used their positions toprevent the truth about the killing to become public. All these peopleare criminals. They have to go into the jail."

Also, you have to explain why you have refused to say to the US peoplethe truth by now.

Link:http://d-memoirs.tripod.com/

A list of guilty persons (I will delete you from the list after yourpublic statement):

1. Johnson, FBI agent.Mr. Johnson was the Director of the Russian Department in the NewOrleans office of the FBI in 1990-1992. He is the organizer andexecutor of the killing. Mr. Johnson is the main guilty person. He isthe source for all problems for the USA since 1990.

2. Louis Freeh, former Director of the FBI.Mr. Louis Freeh is the main organizer and executor of the killing. Hehas suggested to President Clinton to approve the killing.

3. Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.Mr. Mueller is using his position to prevent any investigation of thekilling, from 2001 till now.

4. John Ashcroft, former Attorney General of the USA.Mr. John Ashcroft has used his position to prevent any investigationof the killing. Mr. John Ashcroft decided to resign instead to accuseLouis Freeh. Mr. John Ashcroft is a victim of the criminal activity ofMr. Johnson.

5. Alberto Gonzales, former Attorney General of the USA.Mr. Alberto Gonzales has used his position to prevent anyinvestigation of the killing. Mr. Alberto Gonzales is a victim of thecriminal activity of Mr. Johnson.

6. Glenn A. Fine, Inspector General, U.S. Department of JusticeMr. Glenn Fine is using his position to prevent any investigation ofthe killing, from 2001 till now. Mr. Glenn Fine is a victim of thecriminal activity of Mr. Johnson.

7. President Clinton.President Clinton has ordered the killing of William Colby on the baseof a suggestion by the FBI Director Louis Freeh. President Clinton isa victim of the criminal activity of Mr. Johnson.

8. President Bush.President Bush has used his position to prevent any investigation ofthe killing. President Bush is a victim of the criminal activity ofMr. Johnson.

9. Mrs. Hillary Clinton.Mrs. Hillary Clinton refused to make a publics statement that herhusband, President Clinton has ordered the killing of William Colby.Mrs. Hillary Clinton is a victim of the criminal activity of Mr.Johnson.

10. President Obama.President Obama is using his position to prevent any investigation ofthe killing. President Obama is a victim of the criminal activity ofMr. Johnson.

The list of guilty persons given in the letter to President Obama of18 July 2009 is a partial list. There are many other persons involvedin the criminal activity of the USA government and responsible formany crimes. Especially I would like to point out here the role of theFBI special agent Johnson. The story begins with the crimes of Johnsonin 1991-1992. The only aim of Johnson is to improve his career in theFBI. For this aim he is ready to do any crime, and he did many crimes.One day the people will know the truth, and they will be surprised tolearn that the damages for the USA caused by Johnson are much biggerthat one can expect. I have sent many appeals to the USA officials toinvestigate the crimes made by Johnson. Between the many crimes is theproduction by Johnson of completely false, 100% false file about me.In this file, available many years in the FBI information system,Johnson describes me as a FBI agent. (?!) Johnson has produced thefalse file in order to mislead the FBI and to improve his career. Theproblem for the USA is that no one could stop Johnson.

Today the USA society lives in lies. From these lies to a beginning ofa nuclear war there is just one step. The only way to avert a nuclearcrash is as follows: The lies in which lives the USA society must bebroken. The Ames-Colby case gives a wonderful opportunity the lies tobe broken. If the US society knows the truth, then every Americancitizen will be convicted that the USA officials are liars. A liar isthe President of the USA, a liar is the Attorney General of the USA, aliar is the Inspector General of the USA, and so on. They lie dayafter day, year after year. If the society well understand this fact,possibly the US society will be able to make radical changes.Possibly, these changes will stop the nuclear war. The US officialsvery well understand the battle. That is way the US secret servicesand agencies, like the FBI, CIA, Secret service and so on, conducthundreds operations around the world, in order to prevent the killingof William Colby to become public.

President Obama has inherited the problem about the killing of WilliamColby from President Bush. But I think that this fact is not an excusePresident Obama to continue the criminal politics of President Bush.

Today the situation is as follows: President Obama demonstrativelyviolates the USA laws and the USA constitution in order to protect thekillers.

Here I would like to note the role of the Inspector General of theUSA. Since 2001, the Inspector General of the USA Glenn A. Fine hasused his position to protect the killers and to prevent any publicityof the killing of William Colby. Possibly, he will say that he justexecutes the orders of the President of the USA. But, it is well knownthat if the orders of the USA President are unlawful, the InspectorGeneral of the USA has to resign, instead to execute the orders.

I appeal the USA government to begin a court trial against the killersof William Colby and against the USA officials responsible forcriminal operations against USA citizens and citizens of othercountries.

I appeal the US Senate to form a special committee in order toinvestigate in depth the killing of William Colby and the criminaloperations of USA officials against USA citizens and citizens of othercountries.

I am ready to submit to the USA Senate and to the Supreme Court of theUSA a description of the facts and circumstances surrounding thereported activities, such as the evidence forming the basis of thisreport, the names of the individuals involved, dates, location, howthe matter was discovered, potential witnesses and their involvement,any corrective action already taken. It is not reasonable I to submitthis information today. If I submit this information today, I justwill give to the USA government the opportunity to execute new crimesagainst USA citizens and citizens of other countries. Also, I am awitness of the killing of William Colby. I am ready to contribute tothe USA Senate, to the USA Supreme Court, or to a court of theEuropean Union.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This blog may contain videos with copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Roots

Revelation 13

And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy...

...And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?...

Mark 13

And when ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, be ye not troubled: for such things must needs be; but the end shall not be yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be earthquakes in divers places, and there shall be famines and troubles: these are the beginnings of sorrows.