On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:04:53AM -0500, William Harold Newman wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:08:21AM +0100, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> > I have been given a top-level prompt when recompiling the debian cmucl
> > graystream package with --noprogrammer; yes, I know that this is an
> > odd thing to be doing.
> [etc.]
> > Only when I explicitly (quit) does the compilation run continue.
>
> Yes, that's what --noprogrammer was supposed to avoid. Strange, but it
> wouldn't be the first time I made a mistake.
It seems odd to me, on a cursory reading of the code. It seems to
occur on compilation of code from defsystem containing references to
packages that do not exist. It's not just cmucl-graystream; this also
occured with uncommonsql, which used references to lisp::foo when it
meant common-lisp::foo...
> Which version of SBCL are you using? 0.6.12?
0.6.12.2, yes.
Cheers,
Christophe
--
Jesus College, Cambridge, CB5 8BL +44 1223 524 842
http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ (defun pling-dollar
(str schar arg) (first (last +))) (make-dispatch-macro-character #\! t)
(set-dispatch-macro-character #\! #\$ #'pling-dollar)

Daniel Barlow <dan@...> writes:
> So now I'm going to do a fresh checkout on my Alpha and let you know
> (may be tomorrow morning) if it still works
It did, after the one-line patches to debug-int.lisp and grovel_headers.c
below. The other patch included (to make-config.sh) is to make it
possible to build on non-x86 without editing that file by hand,
i.e. to make my life easier when building debian packages. I hope you'll
consider including it in the base system

On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:08:21AM +0100, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> I'm sorry for this bug report, in that it's a bit vague; unless you
> see immediately what's going on, please treat it as a preliminary
> report.
>
> I have been given a top-level prompt when recompiling the debian cmucl
> graystream package with --noprogrammer; yes, I know that this is an
> odd thing to be doing.
[etc.]
> Only when I explicitly (quit) does the compilation run continue.
Yes, that's what --noprogrammer was supposed to avoid. Strange, but it
wouldn't be the first time I made a mistake.
Which version of SBCL are you using? 0.6.12?
--
William Harold Newman <william.newman@...>
"Tweak alpha so it sends SIGBUS for unaligned access, and does NOT
do a fixup. This encourages people to fix their code." -- a commit
note from <http://www.OpenBSD.org/plus29.html&gt;
PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C

Community

Help

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

CountryState

JavaScript is required for this form.

I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products. I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time. Please refer to our Privacy Policy or Contact Us for more details