Your Right to Know

WASHINGTON — To assuage privacy concerns, the White House and some lawmakers are pushing forward
with changes to a surveillance program that would leave the bulk storage of millions of Americans’
telephone records in the hands of phone companies, even though they are convinced the information
now held by the government is protected and question whether the changes would actually do more to
protect privacy.

President Barack Obama intends to ask Congress to end the bulk collection of Americans’ phone
records. Instead, the government would ask phone companies to search their records for possible
links to terrorism.

Obama said that any alternatives to the government holding onto the phone records posed
difficult problems and raised privacy issues.

Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he
thinks the data is safer with the National Security Agency, even though he recommended it be moved
from the agency’s custody.

“We’re changing the program based on a perception, not a reality,” Rogers said shortly before he
introduced legislation that would end the program in its current form.

“They just didn’t have a comfort level with the NSA holding, in bulk, metadata, even though we
had huge levels of protection,” Rogers said. “I do believe that privacy was better protected than
you’re going to see in the phone companies.”

The metadata is the number called, the number from which the call is made, and the duration and
time of the call, but not the content of the call or the callers’ names.

The White House proposal, which has not been described in great detail yet, and the House
Intelligence Committee’s proposal both shift the custody of the phone records to the phone
companies, which already hold onto the records for 18 months, as federal regulations require.

In January, Obama tasked his administration with coming up with new options to the
telephone-records program by Friday. Obama said officials offered an option that he thinks is
workable and addresses concerns raised by the public.

“I want to emphasize once again that some of the dangers that people hypothesize when it came to
bulk data, there were clear safeguards against,” Obama said yesterday at a news conference in the
Netherlands at the end of a nuclear-security summit. “But I recognize that people were concerned
about what might happen in the future with that bulk data. This proposal that’s been presented to
me would eliminate that concern.”

Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor who worked as a systems analyst, leaked details of the
government’s secret phone-records collection program last year.

“After Snowden, there was a lot of mistrust, and we have to deal with that,” Rogers said.

The president’s proposal would require congressional action, something that so far has seemed
unlikely. Multiple bills have been introduced, with proposals ranging from killing the program
outright to adding more layers of oversight.

The government plans to continue its bulk-collection program for at least three months. Friday’s
deadline reflects the date that the current court authorization for the bulk collection expires.
The administration has asked a court to renew it for at least three months, not unlike what it’s
requested in the past.

“The president’s reported plan to end the bulk collection of phone records is a crucial first
step towards reining in the NSA’s overreaching surveillance,” said Michelle Richardson, a
legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.

“The change would replace the dragnet surveillance of millions of innocent people with targeted
methods that are both effective and respect Americans’ constitutional rights.”

Richardson also said the government should end other bulk collection programs, as well.

The bulk phone-records collection program is set to expire in the summer. If Congress can’t
agree on changes before then, the program would end completely.

Rep. C.A. “Dutch” Ruppersberger, D-Md., who co-wrote the House Intelligence Committee
legislation, said the bill has the support of the phone companies.

“There’s been a lot of negotiation with them, but I think we’ve come to this agreement or we
wouldn’t be here now,” Ruppersberger said.