It talks about Dean supporting the war resolution and that he will be on Fox news to discuss it. There's a line about Gore supporting the wrong Dean.

Anyone else feel this is wrong headed? This sort of thing should come from the right wing, not a dem. What does a dem gain by going on right wing fox news and tearing down another democratic candidate? I can't imagine that fox viewers will vote for Kerry.

12. Kerry NOT on Faux News. Carl Cameron did a segment called Perception vs.

Reality of the 2004 Campaign Trail. Cameron used footage from John Kerry's visit to an elementary school yesterday when, during a question and answer period, Kerry talked about Howard Dean's judgement on the war.

"I think the great missing story of this campaign is in fact the truth about Howard Dean's statements about the war,' Kerry said...Dean later said he supported the Biden-Lugar resolution and acknowledged that Bush could have used it to go to war without a vote from Congress."

Carl Cameron's piece was not particularly flattering to either Kerry or Dean, as you can imagine. I suggest you watch the video segment on johnkerry.com before you jump to any conclusions.

before? My God, this is how the pack is whittled down for the fight for the Presidency.Bush chewed up and spit out his Republican challengers in the run-up to the 2000 election.Gore took one hell of a beating from Democrat challengers in his first run at the Presidency and lost the nomination.

If you think this in-fighting is bad, wait until the full fury of the Right-Wing machine takes on whomever wins the Nomination of the Democratic Party. The nomination in-fighting will look like a slumber party in comparison.

When Dean first started attacking the other candidates for their support of IWR so vociferously last January, the media should have examined his attacks, if not right away, at least when he started attracting so much support for those attacks.

Dean attacked them and gained so much while at the same time he supported the key provision that would put us into war on Bush's determination of need. His rhetoric against them was deceptive and insulting to his audience who he asssumed he could fool since hardly anyone picked up on his earlier support for Biden-Lugar.

Clearly identifies the enemy. The proposed resolution closes the door to regional adventures in the Middle East. Under the proposed compromise, the President would have to seek additional Congressional authorization if he wished to widen the conflict in the region.

Spells out clear military objectives. Congress would hold a tight leash on the current conflict. This would be in marked contrast to its role in the Vietnam War, which was lost in part because of nebulous war aims. The Biden-Lugar compromise realizes the folly of sending troops into harm's way without delineating the specific military objectives to be accomplished.

Reaffirms the American conviction that war-making power should lie with the people. In contrast with the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, the Biden-Lugar compromise would respect the ongoing prerogatives of Congress during military engagement. The Constitution demands that American military decisions involving the use of force rest only with the people's representatives in Congress."

You have been trumpeting the fact that Dean said he supported Biden-Lugar for months now. How can you say that he didn't tell anyone he supported it and yet also say he said he supported it? That makes no sense. At least you've stopped trying to say there's no difference between the two.

while attacking the other Dems for supporting the same measures he supported in B-L.

btw...I never said there was NO difference between the two. That was a lie put forth by deanies to discredit me. I always stated that there wasn't MUCH difference between the two and that they were similar. Please don't spread false memes.

39. He didn't say it in forums that were attended by antiwar supporters

he said he was for Biden-Lugar to various reporters when he was still running as a centrist.

You can't see the difference? Can you find me any of his speeches where he is attacking the others for IWR where he tells his fired up audience that he, too, supported Bush making the final determination that force is needed and even unilateral force?

I said the provision that Dean attacked them on was the same. Bush was allowed to make the determination for use of forec even if it was unilateral and THAT is what Dean fails to tell his audiences. Only a few reporters ever were told about Biden-Lugar and that was likely Dean covering his ass in case the war was a success.

When is he ever going to understand why he doesn't have the widespread support he expected to get? What Dean does or says has nothing to do with why many Democrats are angry with John Kerry. They are mad not even because of the vote at this point. They are mad because John Kerry keeps making excuses for his vote and rather than own that, be responsible for his own bad choices and apologize for that...he's trying to blame Howard Dean for something that is of his own doing.

Kerry supporters, you have got to stop your candidate from continuing what he's doing. Dean supporters are NOT supporting him because of Iraq. All his opposition to Iraq did was get people to look at him sooner. It's NOT why people support him. Kerry is NOT going to win any votes by doing this ridiculous kind of thing. Dean is NOT going to be hurt by it, either. All Kerry is doing by making these foolish attacks on Dean is further alienating the people who are angry with him in the first place because he keeps attacking another Democrat rather than keeping his eye on the prize.

If Kerry continues on the path he has chosen I don't think he'll be elected to any office ever again. He's destroying himself badly.

what's the full quote? You can't just pull one line and bash away. That's simply dishonest. The full quote shows that he was completely consistent. Sorry, but your hammer is a false one on this matter.

and based on a very real resolution that Dean did say he would have voted for. The one that gave Bush the final determination on use of force, even if unilateral. There is no spin just simple fact.

You can't cling to one appearance and one set of statements and expect it to cover ALL Dean's statements and actions that conflict. He attacked others for the very thing he had said he would have voted for.

Noone should underestimate the impact that the fire fighters support of Kerry will have in a general election. NYC Fire Fighters (and the IAFF) supporting Kerry after 9-11 will have a REAL impact as an image that Bush couldn't buy with MILLIONS of dollars.

And It's not just about the IWR vote, but what they did before during and after it all played out.

Kerry can't just wipe away the last year from everybody's mind with some mass-scale jedi-mind trick. They know Dean stood against the war, and did so consistantly. Including Gore, who should know, since he was consulting Dean during the goddamn thing.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.