Behind the Façades in France: What expats and the mainstream media (French and American alike) fail to notice (or fail to tell you) about French attitudes, principles, values, and official positions…

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

The Confederate Flag: Another Brick in the Leftwing Activists' (Self-Serving) Demonization of America and Rewriting of History

How correct were the Republicans to cave in on the subject of the removal of the Confederate flag?

You might be surprised to learn that the answer seems to be, not at all.

As always, the real motive of leftists — aka the drama queens — (foreign as well as American) is never principles (deeply-held or otherwise).

The real motive of left-wing activists is high dramatics. Along with a complete rewriting of American, and world, history to suit their egos.

What is at stake is the officialization of the culpability of the American republic. As well as the guilt of every citizen in the country, and indeed on the planet. All of them in need of the leftist activists' brand of healing, and their type of activist government.

Their human rights campaigns, for instance, have always been directed solely against the United States and/or the West.

The object of the attacks on the Confederate flag is nothing more than another brick in the rewriting of history so that the world's "last, best hope" (Lincoln, quoting Jefferson) becomes a reprehensible hell-hole with symbols to be likened to the Third Reich's Nazi swastika. (Quentin Tarantino called the South's slavery "Auschwitz", no less.) To be compared with the "genocide" of the Indians.

The Founding Fathers are to be rewritten as slaveholders, and Americans are to be deemed the equivalent, almost, of Nazi leaders and concentration camp kapos.

This is what Barack Obama's common core is all about. That is what they mean to teach American kids.

(One detail that, strangely, is always left out by the progressives is how the Southern states, both during the antebellum slavery days and later during the Jim Crow days, is how in all cases, those governments were firmly in the hands of the Democratic Party.)

The drama queens, and their hysterics, never deserve to be humored. Even partially.

… such (self-serving) musings — along with
comparisons of the likes of Barack Obama to such illustrious
predecessors as Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan — [should be dismissed] as not the fruit of
intellectual investigation, analysis, and arguments but—again—as part of
its incessant litany of self-congratulation.

The drama queens' only object is a form of bragging: celebrating themselves as the most intelligent people who ever lived, as the most humanistic people who ever lived, as the most tolerant people who ever lived, as the most compassionate people who ever lived.
And in that perspective, all other people, all other persons, famous or not, past and present, are to be denigrated.

The rewriting of history is something that, when another generation has passed (if that much!), should allow the leftists to do away with part or all of the Constitution with the object of getting all these smiley face activists to, with "the best of intentions", become a permanent feature of government, one that intervenes in all parts of the citizen's life.

Both started coming to an end (some places faster than others, but
certainly all over the West) after the American Revolution and the
advent of capitalism (which some of us prefer to call, simply, the free
market), along with the industrial revolution in the land of their
English-speaking cousins.

I.e., slavery started coming to and end in, and thanks to, the English-speaking nations.

And yet, the only slavery the nitpickers (American or foreign) condemn,
revile, and wail and gnash their teeth over is slavery in the US of A.
South American slavery of Africans? No, not so much. White slavery of
whites (from Rome to the 19th century)? No. Arab slavery of Christians?
No. Arab slavery of (other) Arabs? No. Black slavery of blacks? No.
Slavery today, from the Arab world to the African continent? No. The
only slavery that is rendered in apocalyptic tones—the most apocalyptic
tones possible ("America's original sin"!!)—is America's. (Is it any
wonder that I conclude that we are living in the era of the drama queens?)

… See, I am not defending slavery, but what the drama queens
are doing, and getting conservatives to go along with, is perpetuating
historical falsehoods, along with false comparisons, such as comparing
the life of a slave (but only a black slave in the United States, you
understand by now, not any others) to life in today's modern world
(which truly would be nothing but atrocious) while ignoring the dreary
poverty that life was for most people, black as well as white, in the
West as throughout the rest of the world, up until the 18th and 19th
centuries.

Some years ago … our Red State colleague Erick
Erickson penned a column on a completely different subject titled You Will Be Made to Care.
Erick was talking about gay marriage, but what he described was the the
ever present mode of operation for the modern American Left. It’s not
enough to disagree with someone when there is a difference of opinion on
social issues, government policy or even the color of the sky. It’s not
even sufficient to shut down the conversation, as Guy and Mary
Katharine so aptly identified in End of Discussion. Those who dissent must be forced to bend a knee and participate.

… in keeping with liberal theory, we must eliminate some piece of cloth
that reminds them of their heritage, even if it has nothing to do with
racism or slavery in their minds. It does to us! That requires a trigger
warning, mister, and you didn’t provide us with a safe space!

And We Are The Perpetually And Righteously Offended, So You Shall Comply.

… You must be made to care. You will be made to participate. You will
take the hateful piece of cloth down (though a piece of cloth has yet to
ever shoot up a church or a school) and you will denounce it. Or we
will destroy you.

… Every Southerner I know today abhors the idea of slavery
and would immediately call the police if they found out about anyone
keeping human beings as slaves. But they are also proud of their
heritage and the many things the South represents, and for many of them
the Stars and Bars is emblematic of that sense of history and pride. So
maybe you can crack the politically correct whip and tear down some
flags. I say go to hell. Our brothers and sisters who dwell below the
Mason-Dixon are Americans first and always, but they are Southern by the
Grace of God.

Update: A lot of comments on an Instapundit post are talking about how Confederate symbols are being removed in stores all over America, while communist ones remain. ("So
it is okay to have slaves if you put them in gulags or concentration
camps instead of on plantations? Perhaps after a trial to make it all
legal like?", "Like the Professor said, 'Communists are just Nazis with better PR.'
Maybe the Confederates, who were neither Nazis nor Communists, just
needed PR as good as the Communists?")

Notice a key difference between communism and the South, however. In America, slaves were owned private enterprise (the plantations); in Soviet Russia, laborers were enslaved by the state. Couldn't it be that all that we are witnessing is simply the left's good ol' hatred of capitalism (although slavery is abhorrent, needless to say, to the true free market) coupled with its love of the administrative state?