I met someone basically playing my deck today - but he'd added in bombs to the mix which made it feel very weird. It was a lot slower than this one (and if I wasn't playing a janky Plot Twist Warlock, I don't know if it would have been that effective). Was a nice twist though. :-)

I'm assuming you concede when you get really piss poor card draw because this deck is a one trick pony. The deck is great when you get the correct card flow synergy, otherwise it is possible that it turns into a stretch of unusable cards that don't really benefit each other which ultimately blows.

I'm assuming you concede when you get really piss poor card draw because this deck is a one trick pony. The deck is great when you get the correct card flow synergy, otherwise it is possible that it turns into a stretch of unusable cards that don't really benefit each other which ultimately blows.

No, the only time I ever concede is half way through a match with a Control Warrior (when you can tell at that point if you will win or not).Otherwise, the best thing about a one-trick pony is consistency and this deck is consistent enough for its one trick to be good enough for the deck. Some of the best decks in Hearthstone are the one-trick ponies that do their one trick well enough and succeed with it repeatedly. Why do you think decks like Mecathun Druid / Warlock and things like that were so good? And the fact that the deck is low-costed means that there are rarely ever bad hands to start with (unless you get something like three 5 or 6 mana cards), etc. Even then, though, there is enough to get you back in the game for most match ups.

So, no, unless you're just not very good with this type of deck, then I would say you should virtually never concede as you will usually win most games (positive win rate is what it's all about, hey?)

And I know this can be the case from experience - for example, Tempo Rogue is considered a really good deck right now. However I've tried it numerous times and I can scarcely manage to get a win from it, so it's obviously a deck I don't know how to use properly yet and need more practice. That doesn't mean I think the deck is bad.

First impression, bad deck. You should focus on what your goal is with your deck building. You want to SMOrc opponent down, don't play ooze. It is useless.Two Militia Commander please, it is so core. and the Darius Crowley. Not a fan of the Elite (4 mana 4/3 charge), just run Grommash. Play some bomb cards and run the 7 mana doctor bomb (summon 2 x bombbots with bombs in enemy deck). This card is awesome in SMOrcing.

First impression, bad deck. You should focus on what your goal is with your deck building. You want to SMOrc opponent down, don't play ooze. It is useless.Two Militia Commander please, it is so core. and the Darius Crowley. Not a fan of the Elite (4 mana 4/3 charge), just run Grommash. Play some bomb cards and run the 7 mana doctor bomb (summon 2 x bombbots with bombs in enemy deck). This card is awesome in SMOrcing.

Sul'raze is useless. Cut it down with the new bomb weapon please.

Put one warpath in this deck, for the potential Berserker burst.

And, 1-2 battle rage for card resources please.

I don't think you understand what his deck is trying to do and which decks it is trying to counter.

The Warpath suggestion is decent though, depending on what you're facing on ladder. Grommash seems good as well if you put in the Warpath/s and some draw, but then it becomes a different kind of deck.

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

First impression, bad deck. You should focus on what your goal is with your deck building. You want to SMOrc opponent down, don't play ooze. It is useless.Two Militia Commander please, it is so core. and the Darius Crowley. Not a fan of the Elite (4 mana 4/3 charge), just run Grommash. Play some bomb cards and run the 7 mana doctor bomb (summon 2 x bombbots with bombs in enemy deck). This card is awesome in SMOrcing.

Sul'raze is useless. Cut it down with the new bomb weapon please.

Put one warpath in this deck, for the potential Berserker burst.

And, 1-2 battle rage for card resources please.

I don't think you understand what his deck is trying to do and which decks it is trying to counter.

I'm assuming you concede when you get really piss poor card draw because this deck is a one trick pony. The deck is great when you get the correct card flow synergy, otherwise it is possible that it turns into a stretch of unusable cards that don't really benefit each other which ultimately blows.

No, the only time I ever concede is half way through a match with a Control Warrior (when you can tell at that point if you will win or not).Otherwise, the best thing about a one-trick pony is consistency and this deck is consistent enough for its one trick to be good enough for the deck. Some of the best decks in Hearthstone are the one-trick ponies that do their one trick well enough and succeed with it repeatedly. Why do you think decks like Mecathun Druid / Warlock and things like that were so good? And the fact that the deck is low-costed means that there are rarely ever bad hands to start with (unless you get something like three 5 or 6 mana cards), etc. Even then, though, there is enough to get you back in the game for most match ups.

So, no, unless you're just not very good with this type of deck, then I would say you should virtually never concede as you will usually win most games (positive win rate is what it's all about, hey?)

And I know this can be the case from experience - for example, Tempo Rogue is considered a really good deck right now. However I've tried it numerous times and I can scarcely manage to get a win from it, so it's obviously a deck I don't know how to use properly yet and need more practice. That doesn't mean I think the deck is bad.

Yes, I'm so terrible with this deck that I'm able to draw both Upgrade Cards and none of my weapons. By all means, keep telling me how bad I am.

P.S. Reading Comprehension is important. Reread what I posted. I told you the deck is GREAT when everything comes together. You do realize that's a compliment, right? I also followed this by saying it feels pretty shitty when you experience what I posted in my first sentence. Heck, there are games when I have a small hand and I''m waiting for the right card draw to seal the deal, 99% I'm not conceding at all.

I'm assuming you concede when you get really piss poor card draw because this deck is a one trick pony. The deck is great when you get the correct card flow synergy, otherwise it is possible that it turns into a stretch of unusable cards that don't really benefit each other which ultimately blows.

No, the only time I ever concede is half way through a match with a Control Warrior (when you can tell at that point if you will win or not).Otherwise, the best thing about a one-trick pony is consistency and this deck is consistent enough for its one trick to be good enough for the deck. Some of the best decks in Hearthstone are the one-trick ponies that do their one trick well enough and succeed with it repeatedly. Why do you think decks like Mecathun Druid / Warlock and things like that were so good? And the fact that the deck is low-costed means that there are rarely ever bad hands to start with (unless you get something like three 5 or 6 mana cards), etc. Even then, though, there is enough to get you back in the game for most match ups.

So, no, unless you're just not very good with this type of deck, then I would say you should virtually never concede as you will usually win most games (positive win rate is what it's all about, hey?)

And I know this can be the case from experience - for example, Tempo Rogue is considered a really good deck right now. However I've tried it numerous times and I can scarcely manage to get a win from it, so it's obviously a deck I don't know how to use properly yet and need more practice. That doesn't mean I think the deck is bad.

Yes, I'm so terrible with this deck that I'm able to draw both Upgrade Cards and none of my weapons. By all means, keep telling me how bad I am.

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Your idea of fun is subjective. Not everyone has the same experience of fun with a deck as others do. Some people like to win games quickly. Some like to beat an opponent down before they start using irritating mechanics like Lackeys and Waggle Picks, or Mechs and Bombs. Just because you don't find decks that are fast and win quickly and efficiently to be fun doesn't mean that nobody else can or should be allowed to. Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face, rather than messing about with silly combos or boring control decks that do nothing for 45 minutes and let you lose by fatigue. How anyone is able to even claim they think Face decks are uninteractive is hilarious at best. :-D

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Your idea of fun is subjective. Not everyone has the same experience of fun with a deck as others do. Some people like to win games quickly. Some like to beat an opponent down before they start using irritating mechanics like Lackeys and Waggle Picks, or Mechs and Bombs. Just because you don't find decks that are fast and win quickly and efficiently to be fun doesn't mean that nobody else can or should be allowed to. Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face, rather than messing about with silly combos or boring control decks that do nothing for 45 minutes and let you lose by fatigue. How anyone is able to even claim they think Face decks are uninteractive is hilarious at best. :-D

"Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face,"

This is by far the most hilarious thing I've ever read on Hearthpwn xD

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Your idea of fun is subjective. Not everyone has the same experience of fun with a deck as others do. Some people like to win games quickly. Some like to beat an opponent down before they start using irritating mechanics like Lackeys and Waggle Picks, or Mechs and Bombs. Just because you don't find decks that are fast and win quickly and efficiently to be fun doesn't mean that nobody else can or should be allowed to. Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face, rather than messing about with silly combos or boring control decks that do nothing for 45 minutes and let you lose by fatigue. How anyone is able to even claim they think Face decks are uninteractive is hilarious at best. :-D

"Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face,"

This is by far the most hilarious thing I've ever read on Hearthpwn xD

I guess you don't read much then. Would explain your lack of knowledge about Hearthstone, really. Lol

You don't think Face Decks are interactive. You lost the game and your opinion is invalid. XD

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Your idea of fun is subjective. Not everyone has the same experience of fun with a deck as others do. Some people like to win games quickly. Some like to beat an opponent down before they start using irritating mechanics like Lackeys and Waggle Picks, or Mechs and Bombs. Just because you don't find decks that are fast and win quickly and efficiently to be fun doesn't mean that nobody else can or should be allowed to. Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face, rather than messing about with silly combos or boring control decks that do nothing for 45 minutes and let you lose by fatigue. How anyone is able to even claim they think Face decks are uninteractive is hilarious at best. :-D

"Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face,"

This is by far the most hilarious thing I've ever read on Hearthpwn xD

I guess you don't read much then. Would explain your lack of knowledge about Hearthstone, really. Lol

You don't think Face Decks are interactive. You lost the game and your opinion is invalid. XD

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Your idea of fun is subjective. Not everyone has the same experience of fun with a deck as others do. Some people like to win games quickly. Some like to beat an opponent down before they start using irritating mechanics like Lackeys and Waggle Picks, or Mechs and Bombs. Just because you don't find decks that are fast and win quickly and efficiently to be fun doesn't mean that nobody else can or should be allowed to. Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face, rather than messing about with silly combos or boring control decks that do nothing for 45 minutes and let you lose by fatigue. How anyone is able to even claim they think Face decks are uninteractive is hilarious at best. :-D

"Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face,"

This is by far the most hilarious thing I've ever read on Hearthpwn xD

I guess you don't read much then. Would explain your lack of knowledge about Hearthstone, really. Lol

You don't think Face Decks are interactive. You lost the game and your opinion is invalid. XD

Lol, ok now I know you're a troll. Well played

Haha good one! The old "I don't have an actual response, so I'll call you a troll and pretend you got me" trope. Classic! Well done...Ironic though that the 3 year old sock account with barely even 10 posts is calling others a troll... Lol! They never learn...

Nobody is forcing you to have fun. Feel free to go and continue to be bored by not playing the deck. Lol!That had to be the most pointlessly aggro comment I've read in some time, which is ironic since you seem to hate aggro decks so much. XD

I am no fan of aggro (to play) but I don't hate it no. I just don't see what the fun is in smashing the face without thinking about any aspect of the game. Att least with aggro you stiil have to make value trades and think about every move. How people consider facedecks to be fun and interactive is absolutely beyond me. When I want to have fun in Hearthstone I usually play a meme deck or something that is interactive.

Your idea of fun is subjective. Not everyone has the same experience of fun with a deck as others do. Some people like to win games quickly. Some like to beat an opponent down before they start using irritating mechanics like Lackeys and Waggle Picks, or Mechs and Bombs. Just because you don't find decks that are fast and win quickly and efficiently to be fun doesn't mean that nobody else can or should be allowed to. Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face, rather than messing about with silly combos or boring control decks that do nothing for 45 minutes and let you lose by fatigue. How anyone is able to even claim they think Face decks are uninteractive is hilarious at best. :-D

"Face decks are one of the most interactive types of deck in the game, in any case. There is nothing more interactive than direct interaction with the opponent's face,"

This is by far the most hilarious thing I've ever read on Hearthpwn xD

I guess you don't read much then. Would explain your lack of knowledge about Hearthstone, really. Lol

You don't think Face Decks are interactive. You lost the game and your opinion is invalid. XD

Lol, ok now I know you're a troll. Well played

Haha good one! The old "I don't have an actual response, so I'll call you a troll and pretend you got me" trope. Classic! Well done...Ironic though that the 3 year old sock account with barely even 10 posts is calling others a troll... Lol! They never learn...

Okay fine, I'll bite. Explain to me how face decks are interactive. because just moving your mouse from point a to b is not interactive. Interactive means you interact with different elements on the board, like making value trades, baiting your opponent into certain secrets, playing around secrests yourself, (value)trades etc. Hitting the face is just that, hitting the face. It requires zero thought aside from having to clear e.g. taunt minions in the most efficient way. if that's your idea of having an interactive game, by all means I won't judge you. But in general I doubt a lot of people will agree.

Haha good one! The old "I don't have an actual response, so I'll call you a troll and pretend you got me" trope. Classic! Well done...Ironic though that the 3 year old sock account with barely even 10 posts is calling others a troll... Lol! They never learn...

Okay fine, I'll bite. Explain to me how face decks are interactive. because just moving your mouse from point a to b is not interactive. Interactive means you interact with different elements on the board, like making value trades, baiting your opponent into certain secrets, playing around secrests yourself, (value)trades etc. Hitting the face is just that, hitting the face. It requires zero thought aside from having to clear e.g. taunt minions in the most efficient way. if that's your idea of having an interactive game, by all means I won't judge you. But in general I doubt a lot of people will agree.

Simlpy put, because anyone who knows how a face deck really works understands that there is immensely more depth to a game than "drag minion/hero to face; repeat". You continually have to assess the board state, what resources you have available, when to play which cards and at what time, whether to force your opponent to react to pressure or to lull them into a false sense of security by holding back cards to spring a burst lethal. And even more so against decks like Tempo Rogue where knowing exactly when to break the opponent's Waggle Pick is crucial, or against Big Book Mage, having a plan to deal with giants when they appear (or determine the risk/reward of ignoring it). Otherwise you pretty much concede the game if you don't follow these interactive considerations carefully.

People who think a face-deck is just "play my cards and look to only ever go face unless there is a taunt" are usually the same people who try the deck out themselves, find they end up losing heavily because they don't really understand the interactivity of the deck and how it should be played, then they whine about how uninteractive it is when they see someone else play it against them and win.

A truly uninteractive deck (taking a small aside for the off-topic nature of that question) would be something like the original Quest Mage (or to a smaller extent, Quest Paladin), where you literally shut down the opponent's ability to do anything with badly designed cards that give unremovable immunity while you sit back and play your own game. When your opponent literally has no option on there turn other than do nothing and wait, that is true uninteractive game play. Face Decks are the polar opposite to that.

Now, with this new knowledge to hand, you'd have to really acknowledge that Face Decks prompt more interactivty with the opponent than most other decks, since you are forcing the opponent to respond to what you are doing and not ignore you. That's what real interactivity is.