Colours of Water: Bangladesh’s Leather Tanneries

Fuelled by a growing international appetite for leather, the industry represents a sizeable chunk of Bangladesh’s yearly export revenues — $284 million in 2007-08. There are about 200 leather tanneries in the Hazaribagh district of Dhaka, the capital. Some use modest technology and machinery, but most operate as they did decades ago and release untreated toxic chemical waste near residential areas.

The first thing you notice when you walk through the streets of Hazaribagh is the horrible and seemingly all-pervasive stench of tanning chemicals. According to the Department of Environment, the tanneries discharge 22,000 cubic meters of untreated liquid toxic waste daily into the rivers, gutters and canals that run alongside in the roads of Hazaribagh. Toxins are also leaching into groundwater.

The chemicals end up forming coloured ponds and lakes of toxic waste in residential areas and are causing much harm to the 20,000 people who work and live in the tanning district. Most are suffering from chronic respiratory problems, skin diseases and even destruction of the nasal septum.

Workers process rawhides with toxic chemicals such as chromium, sulfur and manganese to name a few. They handle leather skins soaked with acids and dyes with their bare hands in poorly ventilated tanneries where often the only light coming in is through cracks and openings in the walls.

“I had to go to the doctor several times,” says Sanaur Rahman, a leather chemical engineer who had to quit his job at a leather tannery. “There was no ventilation in my plant, we were breathing polluted air and I didn’t feel comfortable working there so I recently moved from Hazaribagh to escape the health hazards.”

Rahman’s fears are well-founded; just this past March, three workers died of chemical inhalation. With his education, Rahman was fortunate to be able to move and look for another job. For most of the people in Hazaribagh this is simply not possible — they have no choice but to work and live there.

“The owners of these tanneries are not highly educated… they don’t know that their procedures are destroying the environment, they do not understand it well,” Rahman says.

All the toxic wastewater eventually makes its way into the Buriganga River, which is considered to be Dhaka’s lifeline. Thousands of people depend on the river daily for bathing, washing clothes, irrigation of food and transportation of goods. The river has suffered extreme biodiversity loss and has now turned black.

“The pollutants have eaten up all oxygen in the Buriganga and we call it biologically dead. It is like a septic tank,” Khawaja Minnatullah, a World Bank specialist on environment and water management, told Reuters reports last year.

Relocation overdue

After decades of discussion on the topic, a relocation project was launched in 2003 to move the tannery district to a remote location near Savar, north of Dhaka, where all tanneries would share a Central Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) as there is no room to build one at Hazaribagh.

Despite the fact that the State Minister for Environment and Forests, Dr. Hasan Mahmud, just weeks ago claimed that the government has taken steps to finally set up the CETP, it is entirely possible that the relocation project will not meet the recently extended deadline, after already missing the original time frame set by the country’s High Court when it ordered the shut down of the Hazaribagh site last year.

The project has languished mainly thanks to bureaucratic wrangling over the compensation fund and debates over who would pay for the treatment plant. Initially, a memorandum of agreement was signed between the government and the tanning association, stating that the government was to bear the expense of the plant. After subsequent review, the government then added a provision indicating that the tanning association would have to repay the cost of such a plant over the course of 20 years. Industries Minister Dilip Barua is now offering to pay 85% and asking the tanneries to kick in the rest.

It’s environmental

Bangladesh’s Environment Conservation Rule of 1997 stipulates that every industrial unit should have its own effluent treatment plant, without which it will not get electricity or gas connections. Enforcement of such laws would have a considerable impact on the condition of the Buriganga River as well as improving the health and safety of the population.

In January 2010, an effort was made to start cleaning the Buriganga’s riverbed. The Buriganga Cleansing Project involves excavating 10 to 12 feet of sludge from the riverbed for a 3 km stretch and is set to last until June 2011. But sporadic efforts to cleanse the river are not enough considering that, while the project aims to remove 1,000 tonnes of sludge from the Buriganga riverbed each month, the tanning industry continues to feed 25,000 tonnes of untreated wastes and 40,000 tonnes of toxic chemicals into the river every day.

Public pressure and media scrutiny will perhaps help. After one report by Dhaka’s Daily Star newspaper, The High Court last week announced that it wants the government to deploy police to the banks of the Buriganga to stop disposal of waste into the river.

Certainly, the experts are calling for action. Dr. Mohammed Ataur Rahman, Director of the Program on Education for Sustainability at the International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, says “measures to mitigate the rising water crisis” are urgently needed.

Regardless of the government’s questionable priorities and failure to enforce environmental regulations to date, some are still optimistic about the future. Rahman feels the answer lies in education:

“It is educated people and people with university degrees who understand the long term effects of chemical pollution on the environment and they are the ones in the best position to ensure cleaner methods and environmental policies in the future.”

Further, there are those who believe Bangladesh’s tanning industry can indeed be cleaned up and made more sustainable.

So — for the sake of the Buriganga River, the ecosystems that depend on it, and the health of the people of Hazaribagh — all Bangladeshis and empathetic international community members should continue clamouring for the solid enforcement of relevant laws and the development of comprehensive governmental strategies that are followed through expeditiously.

Author

Having studied film production, Daniel has been working in the film/television industry for several years. His work on documentaries has been influential to his work as a photographer. He has been fortunate enough to work in Africa and recently in South East Asia. He currently splits his time as a freelance videographer/photographer and video editor in Montreal, Canada.

Join the Discussion

BrendanBarrett

Daniel, The article and photo essay are excellent. Everytime I show the photos to someone they are lost for words. How can this be possible? Why do we accept such a tragic way of life for so many people? I am so impressed that you took the time to explore this issue and to try to bring it to public attention. Sadly it appears they are all asleep.

Imrankhas

The Govt Of Bangala Deish
take a big step against the tanery owner of hazari baig
all the owner make a treatment plant with the help of Govt
all water first treat and then put in the river
i am a leather techinicion i under stand the hazared of tanery poluted water on life
govt take step as soon as possible
i request all the leather company of the world they boycot the Bangla Deish Govt if it con,t take a step in this problum

http://www.facebook.com/tauhid.tipu Tauhid Bhuiyan Tipu

Let’s raise our voices to push the tanneries in the capital
city Dhaka to be relocated in coastal areas.

The relocation project of Bangladesh government – relocating
the tanneries (around 200 factories) from Hazaribagh area to Savar – is a very poor
strategy to solve the environmental issues (air, water and soil pollution in
densely populated Dhaka).

On the other hand, there are lot more benefits of relocating
in coastal area somewhere closer to the sea ports:

1.
Highly valuable fresh water of rivers can be
saved. It’s a big difference between “dumping waste water in river” and “dumping
waste water in sea” even after effluent treatment. A centralized effluent treatment is an obvious
need for the leather industry of Bangladesh.

2.
Leather goods are Bangladesh’s major export
products. So transportation cost can be minimized.

3.
Tanneries need huge amount of salt which are
cheaply available in coastal area at almost no cost.

4.
Tannery factories are extremely smelly. They also cause serious soil pollution by
disposing chemicals consisting of heavy metals. The salty soil of less populated coastal areas
is supposed to be a right choice to build an industrial park for leather
industry of Bangladesh.