I have long made the exact same analogy Dan just did. We went from exposure of past marijuana use being a career ender for a political figure (Justice Douglas Ginsburg, anyone?) to it being ho-hum. Our last three presidents before the incumbent admitted to marijuana use ... and more for the last two. Likelwise, the ubiquitousness of cameras on cell phones makes it inevitable that nudes of future politicians will surface. Naked selfies exchanged with lovers get saved. People document those naked laps college kids do after getting shut out in beer pong, or that mass stream on the first snowfall or first day of finals. And eventually, these political nudes will be as expected as confessions of marijuana use.

But I assumed the first would be a millennial or post-millennial, someone who grew up in the digital age. I did not expect the first would be a septuagenarian who might know how to tweet but can’t figure out email and doesn’t touch a computer.

Oh I wouldn't worry too much about inadvertently seeing the presidential penis - unless the image has been greatly enlarged, it'll probably won't look much different than the smallest pinky-finger on his tiny little hands.

Uhhhh, clicked your link there and was taken to a page indicating the site may not be secure and I could be putting personal information at risk. So I instead googled "jampac lawsuit" and found..... not much! I did check out this article on a case that was dismissed last year. Is that what you were talking about?

If the pic is just a dick, how credible will the claims be that it's not actually Trump's dick? I mean from an IT perspective, how likely is it that it can be demonstrated to be a picture from Trump's phone and/or text messaging service?

As to this: “not something i need to see but thrilled that they might be released if they exist”. How about: Unninteressante Sehensmoeglichkeitsbegeisterung. I couldn't pack it all into one word, per se.