Given that if you combine all the spellings of Everly from 2012, there were about 600 (with Everly being the most used spelling), it's not that uncommon really. Certainly not that uncommon it can be seen as copying!

Admittedly it's not widespread, but I think about 600 is still a significant enough number, when you consider some names really are used only a handful of times.

As for the name, it's not something I'd use, but it's not as bad as some celebrity names.

Given that if you combine all the spellings of Everly from 2012, there were about 600 (with Everly being the most used spelling), it's not that uncommon really. Certainly not that uncommon it can be seen as copying!

Admittedly it's not widespread, but I think about 600 is still a significant enough number, when you consider some names really are used only a handful of times.

As for the name, it's not something I'd use, but it's not as bad as some celebrity names.

600 births would put the name right around the #500 mark.

I was hoping they'd use something nicer but yeah, it's not as bad as other celebrity names.

** The opinions expressed above are not meant to be reflective of Nameberry as a whole but are my opinion and mine alone. **