Haryana Wetlands Review 2017: Urbanization Taking Over Basai Wetland

All through 2017, Basai Wetland has been in news following Haryana Government plan to build a Construction and Demolition (C&D) plant in its close proximity. Activists, Birders left no stone unturned to oppose the plant. They approached National Green Tribunal (NGT) and even wrote to Haryana State Government to identity it as important wetland. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) also blamed Haryana Government for being negligent towards the cause of wetlands and asked it to give Basai legal protection by declaring it a protected wetland. All these efforts went futile and in sad turn of events, NGT, on 10 January 2018 revoked its stay over construction of the C&D plant thus closing the doors of hope for Basai wetlands and dependent eco-system.

Basai Wetland

Basai wetland is encircled by Sector 102, Dhanwapur and Basai village from west, north and south directions in Gurugram district of Haryana. The wetland is permanent shallow wetland covering an area of about 250 acres. Rain, irrigation and sewage water in turn keep the wetland inundated round the year.

The wetland was “discovered” as a birdwatching destination in 2001 when ornithologist and author Bill Harvey made a pit stop by the Basai railway track, en route to the Sultanpur National Park for a morning round of birdwatching. A 2001 field report of the Delhi Bird Club mentions that the Basai wetland covered an area bigger than Sultanpur jheel, a landmark bird sanctuary a few kilometres further down the Gurugram-Sultanpur road.

The wetland supports a high diversity of birds including migratory ones. It has been recognised as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area. In May 2017, eBird has recorded 282 bird species at the site including many listed in Threatened category by IUCN. The area around the wetland also provides refuse to wild animals.

But in last two decades, around six‐seventh of the Basai village’s agricultural land has been lost due to urbanization and residential development. The village has also lost five of the six ponds to urbanization. The loss of open land around the wetland has also affected livelihood of farmers and potters.

Concerned have been raising alarm over increasing construction activities, real estate development, and resultant disturbance affecting the wetland and birds. A proposed C&D waste processing plant by a multinational construction firm, approved by the Gurgaon Municipal Corporation, has raised fresh concerns over habitat loss, dust pollution, and disturbance to the wetland and its rich bird life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basai_Wetland

May 2017: Govt Proposes C&D Plant At Basai

In May 2017, the State Govt proposed to set up reportedly the first C&D of Haryana over 3.5 acres of land in Basai village to make the city debris-free. The processing capacity of the plant was reported to be 300 tonnes concrete waste per day. The cost of the plant was stated to be Rs 13 crore and ILFS Company was given contract to build and operate it. The company had assured to start production at the plant by the end of 2017. As per report, due to rapid urbanisation the quantity of construction waste was increasing fast and it was expected to increase by 10 per cent every year. https://www.indiatoday.in/pti-feed/story/construction-and-demolition-waste-processing-plant-to-be-set-930592-2017-05-22 (India Today, 22 May 2017)

In June 2017, bird watchers flagged concerns over the project claiming the plant is coming up in the wetlands’ catchment area. Fearing damage to wetlands and noise disturbance to birds, they also demanded to shift the plant somewhere else.

But officials at Gurgaon Municipal Corporation (MCG) refused to pay attention saying that the plant will help to process tonnes of construction debris being dumped in the Aravallis and elsewhere.

Refuting the MCG’s assurance that the project in no way would threaten the wetlands, birders revealed that an officer of the pollution control board was recently transferred for raising objections and refusing permission to the plant.

Activists also alleged that micro-dust emanating from the plant would not just destroy the wetlands but also trigger large-scale pollution affecting the area’s greenery. Both the pollution control board and the MCG refuted the allegation. On the contrary, they claimed that the area surrounding the plant was degraded land and not a wetland at all.

In the same month, Delhi Bird Foundation (DBF) filed a petition in NGT raising concerns over the project coming up in wetlands catchment area. Following this, NGT issued notices to the Haryana government, MCG, IL&FS Environmental Infrastructure and Services Ltd and the MoEF&CC seeking an explanation.

Noting adverse impact of project on the wetlands, the green tribunal on July 4, 2017 ordered to stay the construction work and maintain “status quo” till the next hearing. The tribunal was also informed that the boundary wall of the plant, being developed by IL and FS environmental Infrastructure and Services Ltd, was adjacent to the rich biodiversity of bird species. The Haryana govt repeated that the area was a not a notified wetland. https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/python-inside-iaf-transport-plane-at-agra-airbase/1091907?scroll (Out Look India, 5 July 2017)

August 2017: MCG & DBF Submits Photographic Evidence To Support Their Claim

In September 2017, replying to queries posed by NGT, the MoEF blamed the Haryana government for not taking any step to identify and classify wetlands, including Basai caught in legal tangles due to lack of clarity on its status. It also claimed that the state government had not submitted any report on the status of the Basai wetland.

“Till date, this ministry (MoEF&CC) has not received the brief document for the subject Basai wetland in the state of Haryana. Hence, the government of Haryana and its concerned organisations are required to take necessary action in the matter,” reads the reply filed by the Union ministry.

In Nov. 2017, NGT directed the Haryana government to present the No Objection Certificate (NOC), procured from the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, (HSPCB) for the construction of C&D plant. As per state govt it was upon the NGT’s direction in 2015 that it had come up with four sites for the C&D plant and requested for amendments to its order. The NGT bench refuted that claim, stating that although it had asked the government to build a plant, the bench did not have the responsibility of approving the site and, hence, will admit any objections to the site proposed by the govt. Staying the work further, the court extended its order by fortnight. https://www.hindustantimes.com/gurgaon/ngt-directs-govt-to-show-approval-it-got-from-pollution-control-board-for-basai-c-d-plant/story-ykLsD79oQT6cbsuxMPmF8K.html (Hindustan Times, 1 Nov. 2017)

In December 2017, NGT appointed advocate Ravinder Kumar a local commissioner to make a proper assessment whether the land allocated for the C&D plant was a wetland or not and in case the site was not a part of the wetlands then what was the distance between the wetland and the plant site. Hearing both side arguments, the court also appointed to inspect the site and present his assessment during the next hearing. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/basai-arid-or-a-wetland-ngt-to-decide/articleshow/61886601.cms (The Times of India, 2 Dec. 2017)

Submitting the report, commissioner revealed that the Basai wetland was about 250 metre from a kuchcha road off which the C&D was proposed. The report also added that though the right flank of the road might qualify as a wetland, the project site did not fall in the catchment area.

“The project land does not appear to be a wetland or part (of it). Birds are seen in and around the portion inundated with water on the right flank of the kuchcha road, which would qualify as a wetland… can be decided only by the honourable tribunal,” read the report.

During the hearing, the tribunal also asked the petitioners to approach the Haryana government in order to get the proposed site declared a wetland. As it was the prerogative of the state to decide on the nature of the land. While the court did not oppose the C&D proposal, but it gave the petitioners time till Jan 3, 2018 to file their response to the report filed by a local commissioner. The report filed by the local commissioner had said that the site at Basai may be called a water body but he refrained from calling it a “wetland”. https://www.hindustantimes.com/gurgaon/ngt-asks-birders-to-approach-state-govt-to-get-basai-status-of-wetland/story-H0TiLJIJTphDTvfYH0hkyO.html (Hindustan Times, 14 Dec. 2017)

More than 240 species of birds such as Marbled Teal, Sarus Crane, Black-necked stork and Asian dowitcher visit the Basai wetlands. (Parveen Kumar / HT FILE)

Following NGT suggestion, petitioner wrote to the state wetland authority appealing it to notify Basai as a wetland.

Building the case for Basai, the letter stated: “The large wetland in sectors 101 and 104 of Gurgaon, is a mix of scrubland, fallow and cultivated fields, vegetation and flooded zones that support hundreds of varieties of bird species. The tree cover in the 700-acre area includes the Acacia and small shrubs. In addition, Basai wetland has rich reed beds of typha, phragmites, and water hyacinth stated the letter to the Haryana government.”

It is important to note that the area was providing habitat to more than 20,000 birds of 280 different species, which was 60 percent of the total bird species seen in the National Capital Region (NCR) making it one of India’s key ornithological hotspots.

As per DBF, the wetland area, comprising Najafgarh (Sahibi river basin), Basai wetland and Sultanpur National Park and wetlands in Jhajjar (Dhigal village), together formed a large ecosystem for migratory birds.

The site qualifies to be declared as a ‘Ramsar’, site which implies that it has international importance, reads a remark in the 2004 survey by the Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON). Citing Central Groundwater Board (CGWB) report that all water bodies in the area as a source of groundwater recharge, the survey also stated that Basai wetland was important to the city at a time when the city’s groundwater level was falling at an alarming rate. http://www.hindustantimes.com/gurgaon/notify-basai-as-wetland-birders-write-to-state-govt/story-RebB31uzOxcEYZg7zjs1PP.html (Hindustan Times 30 December 2017)

The order, reads, “The order is susceptible to mischievous interpretation since the order records not to set up any machinery, equipment and operate the same therein for running the facilities of C&D waste processing without obtaining authorization from HSPCB.” Reacting to NGT order Pankaj Gupta of DBF and one of the petitioners, said that MCG had approvals under the Water and Air Act, as well as from HSPCB, however they did not have approvals under the C&D Rules. The final judgment in the order is yet to be given. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/no-pause-on-basai-plant-but-air-cleared-on-rules/articleshow/62641726.cms (The Times of India, 25 Jan. 2018)

Other Wetlands Developments In 2017

In Nov. 2017, MCG planned to outsource the revival work of 16 ponds including Basai, Sukhrali, Fazilpur and Jahazgarh to improve the fast depleting water-table levels in the district. It had allotted tender for the Sukhrali waterbody for Rs 70 lakh and had floated tender for Basai pond.

According to revenue records, Gurgaon originally had nearly 120 waterbodies, of which only 16 can be revived now as per MCG. As per the report, CM had announced the setting up of a pond management authority for the rejuvenation and development of more than 14,000 ponds in Haryana.

In Jan. 2018, highlighting public as well as administrative apathy that poses a serious threat to the Gurgaon water bodies, an RTI application revealed that about nine ponds – two ponds each at Shikohpur and Sadrana, and one each at Sikanderpur Bada, Garhi Harsaru, Chandu, Dhankot and Makdaula have been filled up with waste water.

As per local people, earlier, these nine ponds used to be the main source of water both for drinking and other household use. But rampant discharge of garbage and waste water has turned these ponds into stinking cesspools, spelling death for fish and other aquatic life too.

Gurugram lost 389 water bodies in 60 years: StudyAs per latest report, Gurugram has lost as many as 389 water bodies in the past 60 years, a study has revealed. According to the study, there were 640 water bodies as per revenue records of 1956. However, 251 water bodies exist as per the current revenue records. The study also found that 253 out of 291 villages have water bodies in the Gurugram district.

The study also highlights that low-lying areas, which show up on satellite imagery of 2011-12 but not in the revenue records, are at the highest risk of being filled up. The study also proposed to access the change in water bodies between 2012 and 2017.

Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice whilst you amend your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog web site?
The account helped me a applicable deal. I have been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered brilliant transparent concept