In this edition of this textbook, I was hoping to derive rest-massratio of proton to electron via magnetic monopoles. Looks like that isnot going to happen anytime soon. However, back in 2010 I was able toderive the rest-mass ration of proton/electron fairly easily using theAtom Totality theory.

Now before I discuss the derivation, let me point out that many inphysics feel that a derivation must be an integral multiple of pi. Whythey feel that way I am not sure. But to their delight, I derive theproton/electron ratio as a multiple of pi.

Here is what I wrote in a previous edition in 2010.

> (i) Alright, so I have the number "pi" from pure physics as 22 > subshells in 7 shells > of the 231Pu Atom Totality

Comment: so here we see familar pi as subshells/shells, or, 22/7 inrational form

> (ii) I have the number "e" from pure physics as 19 occupied subshells > in 7 shells

Comment: if a derivation is true in physics for pi, then it shouldhold true for "e" also for the two constants of mathematics arelinked. And here we recognize that the Atom Totality has 22 subshellsin full for 231Plutonium but it has only 19 of those 22 subshellsfilled at any one instant of time.

> (iii) I have the Fine-Structure Constant as 22 / (22/7)^7 from pure > physics

Comment: so now, 231Pu Atom Totality derived pi and e, and it shouldderive the most important constant of physics, the Fine Structureconstant that permeates throughout the Maxwell Equations. And itshould derive it purely from pi. Now because it uses a 7 exponent,that indicates a energy term as being the 7th energy level of thes,p,d,f suborbitals. This clue leads into the derivation of the proton/electron mass ratio in that a exponent is involved.

> (iv) I have the mass ratio of proton to electron as 6 (22/7)^5 from > the fact that > 231Pu has the 5f6 energy level, where the fifth energy level has > exponent 5 > and the seventh energy level has exponent 7 in Fine Structure > Constant.

Comment: Now I used 22/7 as 3.142 to get 306.21 x 6 = 1837.3. NowfromDirac's Directions in Physics, he wrote that the ratio is approx 1840and I will leave it at that.

I will also say, that the above is the first time in the history ofphysics that anyone has derived the constants of pi, e, fine-structureand proton/electron mass ratio where all four constants are linkedtogether into a logical structure.

> (v) Now I have the Speed of Light from pure math and it is :> speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / log-spiral- > radius

Comment, well that is not linked to the above, and that was a novelnew way of deriving the speed of light and is probably but the factthat the Maxwell Equations derives the speed of light is a linkageitself.

Now maybe the magnetic monopoles have a means of deriving the rest-mass ratios, but for now, there is no progress on that account.

--Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple andfair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here: