but Rihanna's situation was different. Rihanna won her lawsuit against her accountant for $10M because he was mismanaging her money. he was giving her terrible advice leading her to believe she had x amount to spend and certain crapshoots were actual investments. and that was like 2009, before she made the bulk of her money. she will never go bankrupt now.

not really she was spending what she did not have, same as him

that's why I said when she was going bankrupt

that was on advice from her accountant. she was making a lot of money and really blowing up at the time. sean kingston is spending money when he has nothing going on. he knew that his pot was empty. sean kingston has no one to sue.

ok...i said she was just really blowing up at the time, i'm sure that on the ADVICE of her accountant whom she successfully sued, she spent the money. whereas Sean Kingston is blowing money just to do it without actually having a job or resources. there is a distinct difference between the two.

i am not arguing that people do not overspend in Hollywood. you said it was the same thing and my only point is that it's actually not. we are talking about someone with a job spending money with the permission of her money management team vs. someone who is unemployed spending like there's no tomorrow.

In 1998, Braxton faced negative publicity from her first Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. That filing came after a dispute with her recording contract at La Face Records, in which she sued to get out of a contract that she claimed only paid her 35 cents per album, while they made almost $200 million in sales, according to the LA Times.

<span style="color: rgb68, 68, 68; font-family: tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 19px;">In 1998, Braxton faced negative publicity from her first Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. That filing came after a dispute with her recording contract at La Face Records, in which she sued to get out of a contract that she claimed only paid her 35 cents per album, while they made almost $200 million in sales, according to the LA Times.</span>

I was being sarcastic I thought it was 85 cents

Damn and the album costs like 10 dollars smh at least break em off with like $2 per album

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot create polls in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forum