Friday, 6 November 2009

And that gurgling sound you hear......

Picture the scene: a 66 year-old woman is being seriously assaulted in her car, strangled in fact. Gärd Forsgren, for it was she, was possibly in danger of her life. At least she thought so. A number of cars drove by the incident at Nas, in central Sweden.

But not Per-Anders Pettersson. He stopped, hit the unnamed assailant on the shoulder with a car jack, and for good measure gave him another wallop on the head, fracturing his skull. Gärd Forsgren survived, and still does.

Now picture this scene: The criminal is brought to court. "Gärd informed the court that a drunk 26-year-old man stopped her car while she was driving on route 71, forced himself into the vehicle and held her in a stranglehold that gave her cause to fear for her life. Forsgren told the court that as many as 20 cars passed by and did not stop despite her screams and that she had the hazard lights flashing on her car. Her rescuer was to arrive in the shape of 34-year-old Pettersson who at first screamed at the attacker and then hit him on the shoulder with the jack that he was carrying."

The verdict? The criminal got a sentence of one year in jail and has to pay the victim €6,000.

‘He got off lightly’ you say? Oh, perhaps I should explain. The criminal in this instance was not the unnamed attacker of the woman, rather the good Per Anders.

Yes folks, he went to the help of the woman, whacker her unnamed attacker, and now, after an unsuccessful appeal to Sweden’s Supreme Court, has a criminal record and languishes in a Swedish jail.

And the unnamed victim/attacker? He had to pay Gard about €700 in compensation.

That gurgling sound you hear is Sweden going down the drain.

Now some of you might wonder why the victim/attacker hasn't been named. Go to the bottom of the class! You obviously haven't read my postexplaining how these things are managed in East Germany Sweden.

23 comments:

The enemy is NOT this 26-year-old low life pig who the pc twits won't identify (for fear of bothering their weak-kneed college professors). The enemy is the liberal bas__rds who make Sweden's laws and the gutless cowards who allow these laws to stand, most definitely including the fake news organizations who also refuse to really tell the story.

I am quite sure that Ireland has it's equivalent of the Saltsjobaden agreement; a self-censoring agreement by the journalists' trade union, enforced by peer pressure, in the interests of being 'responsible' rather than informative.It's completely credible.

No Western man should cooperate with the state. Polite yes, cooperate no. The West is a mad house. Fred Toben had it right when he just turned his back on the court. Simon Sheppard had it wrong when he took the whole process seriously. The most difficult thing for a white man to do is to keep his mouth shut and treat the state with the contempt it has earned.

Savant (and anon 14.20) - the perpetrator in this particular case was local drugcrazed white trash.

As a general rule, the Swedish media do not reveal the name of a perpetrator or any other relevant background details. (Swedish journalists on the whole prefer, that the voters are told as little possible.)

The Swedish journalists, however, from time to time reveal the name of a perpetrator with a Swedish name in order to give the false impression, that most violent crimes in Sweden are committed by Swedes.

@munin - I'm surprised to say that the attacker was local white trash for 2 reasons. First because as we know Swedish journalists officially don't identify foreign criminals by name. Why would they idnetify one and not the other if they're both white.

Second, a colleague from Vaxjo, near where the incident happened, says that the guy was born in Sweden of Kurdish parents. Can't see you're correct on this.

The Savant wrote: "Why would they idnetify one and not the other if they're both white."

As a general rule, the Swedish media do not reveal the name of a perpetrator or any other relevant background information. Their objective is to hide the extent of immigrant crime. If the the journalists only withheld the names of immigrant perpetrators - the extent of immigrant crime would be transparent to Joe Public.

(From time to time the Swedish journalists make an exception and reveal the name of a perpetrator with a Swedish name in order to give the false impression, that most violent crimes in Sweden are committed by Swedes.)

I am correct re this particular crime - the perpetrator in this particular case was local drugcrazed white trash.

The other man's name (Mattias Brodin) and a PDF-file with the verdict have been made available on (at least) one website.

http://politisktinkorrekt.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/b-5321-07.pdf

Växjö is NOT near where this particular incident happened. It happened in Nås (in Dalarna) - some 300 miles north of Växjö - so you must be thinking of some other incident. Given the grotesque level of crime (and bizarre sentencing policy) in Sweden, it is easy to mix one crime up with another.

What an appalling story! It's hard for me as an American even to understand that such things are possible. If something like this travesty had happened in the US, the outcry and backlash would be deafening. The Swedish Marxists have certainly turned the world on its head. 2+2=5.

Savant:We whites deserve what we are getting.We can rant and rave to our heart's content - but its over.When darks are many, days are few.I've had enough.Good luck to you bunch in Europe, as your interesting times are coming.

What he calls "liberal insanity" is called "the rule of law" by most reasonable and sane people. In Sweden, as in most other civilised countries, it is permitted to use force to prevent a crime, but it becomes a crime in itself when excessive force (more than is absolutely necessary) is used. In this case, the court found that the defendant had acted in an exemplary manner when he came to the woman's rescue and that he had been entitled to hit the attacker over the head with a car jack after the attacker failed to desist, but that he had gone too far when he then hit the unresponding man a second time, with sufficient force to fracture his skull and leave him with a permanent affliction. The incident happened in 2006, by the way, and the court case was in 2009.

Here is a quote from the District Court's judgement:

"Någon nödvärnsrätt fanns inte längre och hade inget fog för att tro något annat. Han borde i varje fall ha avvaktat innan han slog till andra gången." (There was no longer any right of self-defence and Per-Anders Petterson had no cause to believe anything else. In any case, he should have paused before striking the second time).

A rather tough decision, but as one Swedish legal expert explained, there have to be penalties when excessive force is used even in self-defence, otherwise there could be carte blanche for all kinds of vigilantism.

Incidentally, the attacker is an ethnic Swede and was suffering a mental disturbance when he ran onto the road and jumped on the bonnet of the woman driver's car, causing her to stop and then got into the car and grabbed her by the throat.

No scope for racist propaganda here. Sorry to disappoint you, Cardassian on Smack