Hitler joins gun debate, but history is in dispute
In the months since the Newtown, Connecticut, school massacre, some gun rights supporters have repeatedly compared US gun control efforts to Nazi restrictions on firearms, arguing that limiting weapons ownership could leave Americans defenseless against homegrown tyrants. But some experts say that argument distorts a complex and contrary history. In reality, scholars say, Hitler loosened the tight gun laws that governed Germany after World War I, even as he barred Jews from owning weapons and moved to confiscate them.

We are the world's leading innovator, designer, manufacturer and
marketer of firearms, ammunition and related products for the hunting,
shooting sports, law enforcement and military markets. As one of the
largest manufacturers in the world of firearms and ammunition, we have
some of the most globally recognized brands including Remington®,
Bushmaster® Firearms, DPMS/Panther Arms™, Marlin®, H and R®, The Parker
Gun™, Mountain Khakis®, Advanced Armament Corp. ®, Dakota Arms®, Para™
USA and Barnes® Bullets.
For more information download the Freedom Group Brochure.

Recently, a major Wall Street holding
company has received a fair amount of attention for its acquisition of
several American firearms companies. With the Second Amendment carefully
watched and guarded by patriotic citizens, many are curious about a
possible subversive agenda being put into motion.

Cerberus Capital Management, a private
equity investment company, owns the Freedom Group, which has been buying
up the gunmakers. Cerberus is one of the largest equity firms in the
United States and was founded by American businessman Steve Feinberg. In
Greek mythology, Cerberus was a three-headed watchdog with a serpent
tail and lion claws that guarded the lower gates of the underworld.

In the category of firearms
manufacturers, Cerberus, via the Freedom Group, has acquired Remington
Arms, Bushmaster Firearms, DPMS Panther Arms, Marlin Firearms, as well
as Cobb Manufacturing and Advanced Armament Corporation. These companies
now make up the Freedom Group.

According to a Nov. 26 investigative
report by Natasha Singer, “Freedom Group’s rise has been so swift it has
become the subject of wild speculation and grassy-knoll conspiracy
theories. In the realm of consumer rifles and shotguns—long guns, in the
trade—it is unrivaled in size and reach.”

Mark Eliason, vice president of sales
and marketing at Windham Weaponry, is quoted as saying that at the
retail outlet Cabela’s, “roughly 20 percent of the long guns for sale
are made by Freedom Group companies.” Also, about a third of all
ammunition comes from the Freedom Group, Eliason said.

Allegations of a conspiracy stem not
only from the stealthy purchases of firearm companies, but also relate
to the supposed connection to George Soros, the politically active and
decidedly left-leaning billionaire speculator. However, the Soros
connection appears to be debunked by no less than the National Rifle
Association itself, which stated: “At no time has George Soros ever been
a part of the ownership group of Freedom Group or Cerberus, and as a
privately traded corporation, there is no possibility that he will be in
the future.” Odds are, the Soros angle was floated to distract from
Cerberus founder Feinberg’s own political involvement as a prolific
donor to the Republican Party and related organizations.

As Michael Collins Piper reported for
AFP in 2006, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and former Vice
President Dan Quayle have ties to Cerberus Global Investments, a New
York-based holding company.

Piper said: “Rumsfeld’s friends at
Cerberus are directly involved in establishing the U.S. military
presence in the beleaguered country of Iraq.” Since that time, Cerberus
has expanded its investments, acquiring the private military contractor
DynCorp in 2010.

DynCorp has had a litany of lawsuits and
scandals levied against it, including allegations of misconduct,
mismanagement of money, drug abuse, kidnapping, child prostitution and
more. A 2003 article in Mother Jones quoted Peter Singer, a
foreign-policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, as saying, “DynCorp
personnel have a local reputation for being both arrogant and far too
willing to get ‘wet’ [i.e. commit pay-for-hire assignations], going out
on frequent combat missions and engaging in firefights.”

Cerberus is also involved with various
companies in the field of pharmaceuticals, paper products, retail
services, transportation, staffing services, television stations and
financial services. In addition, they have worked with Chrysler and
General Motor’s GMAC financing.

With a presidential election looming
within the next year, these types of industry consolidations can lead to
financially influencing those who hold the reins of political power in
America. If Cerberus’s connection to Bush-era names of the past is any
indication, the Republicans may have some heavy political maneuvers
planned for 2012.——Frank Whalen has been a hardhitting radio talk show host for the
past 18 years, and has worked as a consultant for the popular men’s
magazine Maxim. For more news and views from Frank Whalen—and to listen to his radio show online—please visit www.frankwhalenlive.com.

Some AFP readers are wondering if they are on thewrong side of the issue of Zionismand Israel, a concern based on support for Israel among institutions that have been the bedrock of the American conservative movement.
This pro-Israel point of view was expressed Feb. 10 by a reader, who wrote in a letter to the editor of AFP that she was disappointed with AFP’s criticism of Israel. Warning that she has considered canceling her AFP subscription, she wrote that her Bible says, “Bless my people and I will bless you.”
As recently as Dec. 23, the John Birch Society’s New American published a commentary complaining many Americans “believe that the Jews in Israel are an ‘occupying force’ guilty of apartheid against the Palestinian people, whose land the Jews ‘stole.’ ”
And in November, the National Rifle Association (NRA) dispatched a VIP delegation to visit Israel, described in The Jerusalem Post, which reported that Joseph R. Gregory, the leader of the delegation, said, “We want to demonstrate our appreciation and support of the Israeli people because we feel that Israel is important to the U.S. and we love our country.”
The NRA bigwigs met with Israeli police and intelligence officialswho demonstrated techniques for dealingwith suspected terrorists,with the Post citing “one middle-aged female delegate” as having said, “We need to have surveillance like this back home.”
The Post noted that an Israeli spokesman revealed that Israel “had worked with the NRA in the past to share information on operations, intelligence and gun-control management.”
Some take pause in that revelation in light of what the Post did notmention: One NRA critic, Bob Cesca, has exposed the fact that while the NRA has warned against the threat of a national database of firearms or their owners, “the sort of vast, secret database the NRA often warns of already exists, despite having been assembled largely without the knowledge or consent of gun owners. It is housed in the Virginia offices of the NRA itself.”
On Aug. 22, 2013, writing on popular website “TheDailyBanter.com,” Cesca pointed out:
The country’s largest privately held database of current, former and prospective gun owners . . . has been built through years of acquiring gun permit registration lists from state and county offices, gathering names of new owners from the thousands of gun safety classes taught by NRA-certified instructors and by buying lists of attendees of gun shows, subscribers to gun magazines and more.
Cesca cited the research of Steve Freiss at the website www.BuzzFeed.com, which pointed out the National Association for Gun Rights [NAGR] has attacked the NRA for maintaining this database.
NAGR’s Dudley Brown reflected: “We know the National Security Agency is in on everything, but the fact is, so is the NRA.”
Tying this together is that while the NRA receives much of its funding fromthe gun industry, the truth is that major forces in that industry are now under the control of a single giant holding company, the Freedom Group, which The New York Times reported on Nov. 26, 2011 “is the most powerful and mysterious force in the U.S. commercial gun industry today.”
Here’s where things get interesting, in light of the NRA’s support for—and cooperation with—Israel.
The Times reported that “even within gun circles, the FreedomGroup (FG) is something of an enigma” —that “its rise has been so swift that it has become the subject of wild speculation and grassy-knoll conspiracy theories.” The Times described FG as “unrivaled in its size and reach,” noting FG controls such major arms companies as Bushmaster, Remington, Marlin, Dakota Arms and DPMS Firearms as well as firearms-relatedmanufacturers including S&K industries, the Advanced Armament Corporation and Barnes Bullets.
On Oct. 14, 2011, the NRA responded to the growing rumors about FG, asserting that “the owners and investors involved are strong supporters of the Second Amendment and are avid hunters and shooters.”
The NRA also rushed to assure that rumors that billionaire George Soros—an ardent gun-control advocate—held an interest in FG were not true and somehowmanaged to assertwith undocumented authority that he “never will.”
What the NRA didn’t mention is that FG is a subsidiary of themore gigantic Cerberus Capital Management and that the forces behind Cerberus are themselves most unsettling and—note this—intimately tied to the global operations of Israel and Zionism,withwhich the NRA has nowlinked itself in an open and enthusiastically collaborative manner.
The founder of Cerberus, billionaire Stephen Feinberg, was described by Israel’s Ha’aretz daily newspaper as “a New York Jew with a golden touch.” In 2006 Cerberus actually purchased the Israeli government’s interest in Bank Leumi, the second largest bank in Israel. The Israeli newspaper said proceeds from the purchase would go toward “paying off Israel’s high national debt.”
In fact, Cerberus is quite a powerhouse. Business Week described Cerberus as “bigger” than such giants as McDonald’s, 3M and Coca-Cola, noting Cerberus controls some 226 Burger King restaurants, the National and Alamo car rental chains, the Formica Corp. and the old Warner Studios (which, though Business Week didn’t say this, had been owned for years by different elements of the Jewish crime syndicate).
Of interest is that two major American political figures are closely associatedwith Cerberus: ex-Vice President Dan Quayle and former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Feinberg’s front man, Quayle, is chairman of the board of Cerberus. According to Ha’aretz, Feinberg is a “shy wunderkind” who “makes himself scarce around photographers and sends underlings like Cerberus chair Dan Quayle to sign his deals.”
While defense secretary, Rumsfeld was an investor in Cerberus, well before the U.S. invasion of Iraq (of which Rumsfeld and the pro-Israel lobby were among the foremost advocates)—after which Cerberus profited from setting up military base camps in Iraq.
Another major player in Feinberg’s operations is Jewishwheeler-dealerMichael Steinhardt, one of the first prominent figures in the Wall Street hedge fund racket. Steinhardt has admitted he launched his career with funding from his father, Sol Frank “Red” Steinhardt, NewYork’s number one “fence” of stolen jewelry, closely associated with Jewish crime syndicate chief Meyer Lansky. Steinhardt said his father gave him envelopes stuffed with $10,000 in cash—something the average American has never seen—implying that his education at the University of Pennsylvania’s prestigious Wharton School of Business was funded by his father’s mob lucre.
Known for his devotion to Jewish causes, exemplified by his funding of the hard-line pro-Israel “neoconservative” daily newspaper, The New York Sun, now published online, Steinhardt has also been a boardmember and key financial backer of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a lobby for the global Jewish agenda. He also chaired the Democratic Leadership Council in which Bill and Hillary Clinton were prominent and chairs his own Foundation for Jewish Life aswell as Taglit Birthright Israel, funding travel to Israel by young American Jews.
What to make of all of this?
Pro-Israel forces are grabbing control of the gun industry and funding the NRA that is aligned with Israel.
And after every gun control “scare” in America—orchestrated by the media monopoly controlled by pro-Israel financial groups—the gun industry makes gigantic profits. All the while, the NRA maintains a massive database on American gun owners.
Is there a secret agenda in play? One of Israel’s most ubiquitous media advocates, Jennifer Rubin, has said that “for all intents and purposes, [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu is now the West’s protector” because Obama won’t wage war on Iran.
Will the NRA rally Americans to pick up arms to wage such a war, urging patriots into supporting another Israeli war of aggression—another step toward the New World Order? What do you think?
——
Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S. He is the author of Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty Secrets, The New Babylon, Share the Wealth, The Judas Goats and more.

STEPHEN FEINBERG. Described by Israel’s Ha’aretz as “a New York Jew
with a golden touch,” Feinberg controls the New York-based holding
company Cerberus Global Investments,which, in 2006, purchased the
Israeli government’s interest in Bank Leumi, the second largest bank
in Israel. The Israeli newspaper said that proceeds from Feinberg’s
purchase will go toward “paying off Israel’s high national debt.” In
fact, Epstein’s Cerberus venture is quite substantial. The Oct. 3,
2005 issue of Business Week described Cerberus as being “bigger” than
even such well known business giants as McDonald’s, 3M, Coca-Cola and
Cisco Systems and noting that Cerberus controls some 226 Burger King
restaurants, the National and Alamo car rental chains, building
products maker Formica Corp. and the old Warner Hollywood Studios
(which, incidentally, has been passed back and forth between various
Jewish interests—primarily elements of outright organized crime—for
several generations). Another major player in Feinberg’s operations is
New York-based Jewish financier Michael Steinhardt (See MICHAEL
STEINHARDT). And what is of particular interest is that two powerful
American political figures are closely associated with Feinberg’s
operations: former Vice President Dan Quayle and former Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Quayle is Feinberg’s front man, serving as
chairman of the board of Cerberus, and, according to Ha’aretz, Feinberg
is a “shy wunderkind” who “makes himself scarce around photographers
and sends underlings like Cerberus chair Dan Quayle to sign his
deals.” As far as Rumsfeld is concerned, what should disturb Americans
is that Rumsfeld (while serving as defense secretary) was an investor
in Epstein’s Cerberus as far back as 2001—well before the American
invasion of Iraq (of which Rumsfeld was a foremost advocate), after
which time Cerberus profited from setting up military base camps in
Iraq.(...)
KHEDORI ZILKHA was, for many years, the modern-day patriarch of this
family of Jews who trace their origins back to Babylon.They were among
the Jewish princes who reigned in Babylon and remained there after the
end of their exile there. Zilkha was described by the Judeo-centric
New York Sun newspaper (owned in part by Jewish crime syndicate heir,
Michael Steinhardt—See MICHAEL STEINHARDT) as being “a towering figure
who bestrode the financial landscape of the Middle East, Europe,
America and Asia and became an important player in international
banking.” Yet, how many Americans have ever heard of the Zilkha
family? The dynasty is ruled today by Ezra Zilkha who said, “My family
were proud members of the Jewish community that Nebuchadnezzar
established. When the Babylonian captivity ended and many Jews
returned to Jerusalem, my ancestors stayed behind. I am always
conscious of history. My sensibilities are rooted in antiquity.” This
family are among those most powerful and wealthy forces within the
Rothschild Empire, loyal to their Talmudic roots and the Talmud’s
dream of worldwide Jewish domination. The New York Sun has even
described Ezra Zilkha himself as “a living legend.” (Michael Collins Piper, THE NEW BABYLON: THOSE WHO REIGN SUPREME, 2009, p.208, 218)

"(...) the second biggest bank in Israel, Bank Leumi---owned in
part by the government of Israel itself---held a controlling interest in
one of the big "American" corporations that reap vast profits by
operating private prisons in the United States where thousands work
at slave-labor wages while serving out their penal terms. This came even
while Israel was outlawing private prisons on is own soil. (...) none
of the many opponents of the private prison industries in America Jumped
on the fact that Republican Vice President Dan Quayle, in fact, was chairman of the board of the Cerberus
Global Investments, the New York-based holding company which, in 2008,
purchased the Israeli government's interest in Bank Leumi, the Israeli bank that held the controlling interest in the "American" company operating private prisons in America. (...) Israelis are essentially in charge of maintaining a substantial control over America's penal system---and of a growing number of penal systems throughout the world where Israeli-owned companies areagressively engaged in setting up private prison systems (...)" (Michael Collins Piper, CONFESSIONS OF AN ANTI-SEMITE, 2011, p.348-349)

500,000 U.S. Troops searched ALL homes in the biggest gun raid in
history, seizing some 80,000 weapons. After spending 6 years fighting
the against the New World Order agenda, 15 million Germans offered no
more resistance to the tyrannical globalist agenda.
Their nation, and the rights and freedoms they had fought so long for were gone!
Oh, and you thought that Hitler was the “gun-grabber” and that he had
disarmed the citizens? The TRUTH is Hitler had made it easier for
citizens to obtain and maintain firearms. He was NOT part of the “New
World Order” as Alex Jones and so many other fearmongering “patriot
radio” show hosts would us believe. National Socialism was the SOLUTION
to the Capitalist / Bolshevik “New World Order”. It was “government of
people, by the people, and for the people”. Hitler was not a brutal
dictator who ruled with an iron fist, such as the despotic, murdering,
gun-grabbing Soviet leader Stalin, nor a lying democratic swindler, such
as Roosevelt or Churchill, who waging war by false pretence, costing
nearly 60 million lives, for the sake of a few, and their NWO agenda.
NO, he did NOT “burn down the Reichstag” to seize power and invoke
the “enabling act.” NO he did NOT use a “false flag operation at
Gleiwitz as a pretext to invade Poland”. And NO, he did NOT seek war or
want to “take over the world”. Hitler, more than anyone else, wanted
and sought PEACE, and he worked constantly to prevent war!
It’s time the world figured this out.
To free your minds from years of programming, please read my previous posts, watch “Hitler’s War – What the Historians Neglect to Mention” and check out my extensive links section for a FREE re-education at home, in your spare time
“WAKE UP” … indeed Mr. Jones!Related Info:

One of my readers found the following letter to the editor, in an old NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE newspaper dated March 1, 1936,
concerning fearmongering about German rearmament. The reader was kind
enough to type it out and to sent it to me, and so I am pleased to share
it here, along with a few of my own comments and some related links
below.

(Above: NY Herald Tribune-08-02-1936)

REARMING OF GERMANY Forced on Her by Her Neighbors

To the NY Herald Tribune: In his article “Can Europe Escape War?”
appearing in your Sunday editorial page, Captain Cazalet, M.P., rightly
places the factor of German power in the center of his reasoning. For,
from all but total destruction wrought upon the central powers by the
Versailles treaty, Germany alone has slowly but firmly been able to rise
within the last 17 years toward the level of armed force established
and maintained by her former victors. This, naturally more than anything
else, upset the none too judicious calculations of the Versailles peace
makers, moving at the same time Germany into the focus of world
attention.
Oblivious of the blunders of the peace table, the successors of the
men of Versailles are now watching in pained surprise Germany’s rebirth
of power. Their keen disappointment at the Versailles failure would
perhaps find reasoned solace in the admission of the truism that a
living organism such as the German nation ill by nature continue to
function and not stop short in order to oblige mistaken conceptions of
some of the Versailles statesmen.Surrounded by nations armed to the teeth and aggressively
talking of peace, is it any wonder that Germany would feel uneasy until
armed in like manner?
Versailles had forced her to set the good example of disarming, but
her tutors in peace, breaking their pledge, refused to follow it. For
what object did they keep and increase their armaments contrary to their
word? Germany, having no means of defending her country, naturally felt
the constant menace of having her lands turned into a European
battlefield, should the occasion arise.To await passively such holocaust
would have been worse than criminal negligence on the part of her
statesmen. As all negotiations for disarmament led to nothing, there was
only one way Germany could meet this menace: take a leaf from the book
of her former enemies and rearm sufficiently to insure safety for
herself.
Considering this side of the question, which is, after all, not the
least important, one is rather disappointed at the somewhat irritated
and biased tone with which Captain Cazalet speaks of Germany’s
rearmament in his otherwise singularly objective article.
Author: R. BOECKLIN, Litchfield Conn, date: Feb 17, 1936
(emphasis added)
Download Scans:ny-herald-tribune-03-01-1936.pdf (full page)ny-herald-tribune-03-01-1936b.jpg (article only)
*****
Thanks to the person who took the time to share this with me. I
found it very interesting that this writer of the letter used the term
“holocaust” in 1936, and that he was not referring to Jews either, but
rather, of what might happen to Germans at the hands of the allies. It
was really quite prophetic, in light of what eventually happened to
Germany in WWII. There was actually a “Justice for Germans” movement of
sorts in the 1920s / 30s who were the voices of reason, but these were
drowned out by the more bellicose warmongers and often labelled as
“appeasers” or as “unpatriotic”, especially in the late 30s. And,
sadly, the same thing still happens today too, and so I cannot emphasize
enough how imperative it is for those in the “truth movement”, the
“peace movement” and for the world at large to finally learn the full
and true history regarding Hitler, National Socialism and World War II.RELATED READING:In Defence of Germany, by G.E.O. Knight (1934)The Case for Germany – A Study of Modern Germany (1939)
By Arthur Pillans Laurie, M.A.Cantab., D.Sc., LL.D.Edin., F.C.S, F.R.S.E.
With a Preface by Admiral Sir Barry Domvile, K.B.E., C.M.G.The Peacemakers (based upon the work of Michael Walsh, and which I expanded upon)Hitler: An Overlooked Candidate for The Peace Prize, by Alex S. Perry, Jr.

The Piper Report Aug 26, 2013
The sloppy ‘research’ done by so many in the ‘truth movement’ and how it is utilized by our enemies against us.Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM

"All of the tiny little islands of paranoia suddenly were linked up by virtual causeways. One result is that elaborate
conspiracy theories now can be cobbled together literally overnight
through the efforts of hundreds of scattered dilettante conspiracists. Another result is that conspiracists
all around the world now tend to focus on the same few dozen talking
points that figure prominently on the top websites.

The Internet has produced a radical democratization of the
conspiracist marketplace of ideas. No longer does one have to spend
years researching and writing a book to attract attention: One can
simply set up a blog, or chime in on someone else’s, with some
refinement of the existing collective lore. In fact, today’s
conspiracists don’t even have to read books — they can pick up all their
talking points from Truther websites, or, better yet, from Truther
propaganda videos. (...)

This dumbing-down effect explains the downward shift in the age
profile of conspiracists: While influential JFK conspiracy theorists
tended to be bookish middle-aged eccentrics, many of the Internet’s
noisiest Truthers are barely old enough to shave: Conspiracism is
something they fit in between video gaming and Facebook surfing.

Published in Canada by HarperCollins Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

"As this positive social feedback becomes addictive, the conspiracist's
network of enablers growsoften to such a point that it crowds out the
conspiracy theorist's nonbelieving friends. The process resembles the
formation of an electronic cocoon that envelops a conspiracist with codependents."

-"Among the Truthers", Jonathan Kay

AMERICAN FREE PRESSSHOT DOWN. Latest study: Gun bans result in more murdersBy Michael Collins PiperDefenders
of the Second Amendment are again standing up to counter an ongoing
propaganda campaign advocating new gun control legislation.In
connection with the first anniversary of the Sandy Hook incident-20
children and six adults were reportedly shot dead-the mass media
predictably unleashed another torrent of hype agitating for more
measures to curtail firearm ownership.However, thanks to serious,
fact-based research and articulate enunciation of the data, voices such
as John Lott at the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) have been
forceful opponents of the gun grabbers.Lott slapped down gun
grabbers with a recent documented report demonstrating that "every place
that guns have been banned, murder rates have gone up," noting that
"you cannot point to one place where [the murder rate] has fallen [after
guns have been banned] whether it's Chicago or D.C. or even island
nations such as England, Jamaica or Ireland."After the British ban
in 1997, there was roughly a 50% increase in homicide rates and,
although that spike has since subsided, the homicide rate in England
still remains higher than it was immediately prior to the ban.Average
Americans undecided on the gun issue are not convinced to oppose gun
control by Internet rumors that "no kids died at Sandy Hook," or that
"crisis actors" posed as parents of children who died. Instead, the kind
of hard data and logical arguments-utilized by Lott and other
strategically focused opponents of gun control-resonate with average,
commonsense Americans.While Barack Obama's so-called grassroots
political machine-Organizing for Action (OFA)-has pushed, in particular,
for expanded background checks on those who purchase firearms at gun
shows or online, Lott notes that background checks being pushed by OFA
would not have prevented the Sandy Hook tragedy.In fact, Lott noted,
the weapons allegedly used by the gunman, Adam Lanza, had been legally
purchased by his mother and-even under the terms of an Obama-supported
gun control bill in the Senate-those purchases still would be legal.The
media tries to stampede people into supporting the evisceration of the
Second Amendment, but effective defenders of the right to keep and bear
arms target the core issue and don't get sidetracked.That's why AFP is proud to support those who take a strong stand on this important matter.

Man fired for saying elementary school shooter was brainwashed:

No Free Speech for Conspiracy Theorist

By Keith Johnson

Of all the rights enshrined in the Constitution, freedom of speech is
arguably the most cher ished. Should that freedom, however, shield someone who
works with children from losing their job if they write something controversial
on the Internet?

That’s one of the questions surrounding the case of Adam Heller, a high
school English teacher from Bedford, N.Y.,whose online rants triggered a series
of events that brought an early end to his teaching career.

Heller’s troubles began early in 2013 in the wake of the Sandy Hook
Elementary School massacre of Dec. 14, 2012. After striking up an online
friendship with another individual, the two began exchanging a series of
messages. It was during this time that Heller told the other person that he
believed the U.S. government had programmed Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza into
carrying out his murderous attacks and that those responsible “should be
killed.”

These private online messages eventually made theirway to the FBI,which
then placed the 35-year old teacher under surveillance.

Upon learning that Heller was missing work and had recently come into
possession of three firearms, an FBI profiler instructed a team of local, state
and federal law enforcement officials to move in.

“[The FBI profiler] stated that it was her belief that he was following
a typical pattern for potential shooters, and that he now had acquired weapons
and completed that next step in that pattern,” Pound Ridge Police Chief David Ryan
testified at a hearing on the case. “And although he had not specifically identified
a target, we should engage him immediately, before he does.”

Over a period of about six months, Heller, who had never been convicted
of a crime in the past, was passed from police custody to a mental institution and
finally to a disciplinary hearing. From there, the tenured educator was
terminated from his school district after a tribunal deemed him “mentally ill”
and determined that his continued employment would “create an undue risk to the
safety of the students and faculty.”

In an effort to learn Heller’s side of the story, this AMERICAN FREE
PRESS reporter spoke with his attorney, Michael Sussman, a Harvard-trained
constitutional and civil rights lawyer.

When asked how the FBI came into possession of Heller’s communications,
Sussman replied: “This could have very well been intercepted by the NSA.

My own feeling is that AdamHeller is probably one of the victims of the
surveillance that we’ve all come to learn about. I don’t believe the other
party of that conversation went to the FBI. I think they picked up on certain
buzz words, which is a very imposing and dangerous proposition.”

Sussman went on to say that his client’s unconventional, anti-establishment
viewswere not unlike the concerns many Americans share and suggests that Heller
might not have attracted the attention of law enforcement had it not been for
the heightened sensitivities about recent school shootings.

“Tome, this is a case of profound over-reaction,” said Sussman. “We’ve
had periods in American history where there has been great hysteria about things.
Logic and common sense are the casualties of that hysteria. Here, we have [law
enforcement] concluding that Adam is a danger based on a conjunction of events
where Adam is buying weapons and expressing concerns about the government’s official
version of events at Newtown, which is only 45 minutes away.”

Although Heller apparently admits writing that certain people “should
be killed,” Sussman insists those words have been taken completely out of context.

“It was a rhetorical statement, not one of intent,” he said. “I think
in everyday life people use rhetoric to dramatize their dislike for someone or
some situation.

These might be considered terrible words, but a person isn’t normally
doing anything more than venting and using the language to express their
emotions.”

Unfortunately for Heller, the school district did not see it the same
way. Though he agreed to undergo psychiatric evaluation, his attending
psychiatrist accused him of making false statements and failing to cooperate, which
ultimately led to his termination.

Sussman maintains that Heller was cooperative and has filed a federal
lawsuit in an attempt to have the school district’s decision reversed.

“I find the situation worse than outrageous,” said Sussman. “My view is
that Adam engaged in protected speech and conduct. The psychiatrist testified, and
his report also reflects, that he could not conclude that Heller was a danger
to anyone. It was clear law enforcement was pressuring the school district to
keep Heller out.”

When asked if Heller’s rights really should take precedence over a
school district’s responsibility to keep children safe from any potential
threat, Sussman replied: “In the period since this has been made public, many
of the students and families in that community have rallied to Adam’s defense.
But even if they didn’t, we still have to abide by basic constitutional
principles. Ifwe start making exceptions based on fear and speculation, we
begin to erode those principles and will eventually lose them altogether.”

Keith Johnson is a writer based out of Memphis, Tennessee. He can be
reached at keithj.americanfreepress@yahoo.com.

Conspiracies Swirl Around Sandy Hook

Michael Collins Piper

For many years, but especially since the advent of the Internet, responsible truthseekers and independent news sources like AMERICAN FREE PRESS have been bedeviled—besieged—by outrageous disinformation confusing honest efforts to bring forth important facts about history and the issues and events of the day. We find an extraordinary array of irresponsible sources spinning some outlandish claims—conspiracy theories, if you will—that confuse matters further. And this is not to suggest conspiracies don’t exist at the highest and lowest levels.In fact, over the years, critics have slammed AMERICAN FREE PRESS for allegedly promoting “conspiracy theories” when all we have done is report the facts, however uncomfortable they may be for some very real conspirators.Unfortunately, many of the foolish conspiracy theories circulating today arise because those who are looking for conspiracies have a tendency to base their conclusions on what is just downright sloppy and inaccurate reporting by the “mainstream” media in the first place.

Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.,where a mass shooting of children and school emplo-yees took place on Dec. 14, 2012, is now the subjectof raucous debate among conspiracy theorists.

The big media has never been a good source for anything of critical substance, but still, in this day of 24-seven “news” coverage—making current events a variation of “reality” television—bad reporting and otherwise honest mistakes by establishment news sources, often made in the heat of the moment, are suddenly the subject of frenzied speculation. They are then turned into something they are not: the foundation for conspiracy theories purporting to explain “what really happened” regarding some event gripping the public mind.Right now there are widely circulated claims that no children were killed at Sandy Hook, that it’s all a hoax. Others say that local police and firemen were in on the shooting, working to ensure as many kids as possible were gunned down. Others insist it was a CIA “mind control” operation. They claim the alleged shooter was brainwashed into being the “patsy” and that other gunmen carried out the murders—the same ones other conspiracy theorists say didn’t even happen at all.And yes, the CIA does engage in mind control.This writer’s book, The Judas Goats,* has a whole chapter on the topic. So don’t say I’m denying the existence of mind control.One conspiracymonger claimed Israel’s Mossad orchestrated Sandy Hook in order to hurt Barack Obama. Yes, he said that.Others—who don’t like Obama—said that, yes, the Mossad did it, but left out the part that the shooting was designed to hurt the president.So, depending on what you think of Obama, you have two different versions of that theory. But there’s no proof ofMossad involvement in this case.And before accusing me of “covering up for the Mossad,” bear in mind I have publicly charged the Mossad with being behind the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 attacks.Time and time again it’s been discovered that many mass shooters have been on mind-bending psychiatric drugs. Frankly, if I were the head of one of the companies that produce such drugs, I would keep a “crisis team” ready for action every time there’s a shooting. My Internet trolls would be out there cranking out stories saying “the CIA” brainwashed the shooters, thereby misdirecting attention from what could be the real underlying cause. There’s a conspiracy theory to chew on.AFP tries to stick to what we believe to be the facts and we won’t publish any story because “it sounds good” or because somebody thinks “there might be something to it.” ——*Michael Collins Piper is a world-renowned author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia,Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, the United States. He is the author of a dozen books sold by AFP. Order any of these books toll free at 1-888-699-6397

Many Sandy Hook Rumors Have Mysterious Origins• Aftermath of mad news scramble leaves many doubting official story

By Michael Collins Piper

For American Free Press

Agrowing number of people in what iscalled the “truth movement” are becominguneasy with the proliferation ofoften-bizarre conspiracy theories surroundingthe Sandy Hook shooting affair that havepopped up, non-stop, on an almost daily basis.Cautious observers are convinced high-level intriguers deliberately inserted many of these nonsensicaltheories into public discussionfor the very purpose of discreditingalternative theories relatingto other very real conspiracies.Upon learning, for example,that some “conspiracy theorists”believe Sandy Hook was a hoaxand that no children were evenkilled there—a frequent refrain—many in the general public are nowdismissing any and all serious discussion of suchmatters as the 9-11 cover-up, the OKC bombing, theJFK assassination, or even the attack on the USSLiberty as the ravings of “conspiracy theorists.”Attempts to examine those other very real conspiraciesare now being routinely greeted withsuch comments as: “ I suppose you’re also one ofthose who people who doesn’t believe those 20 littlechildren were killed at Sandy Hook.”It seems as though the truthmovement has beenmaliciously manipulated into repeating any and allSandy Hook conspiracy theories as part of some insidiouslycrafted experiment in crowd psychology—a carefully calculated operation designed tomonitor Internet contact between patriots, keepingan eye on “who contacts whom” and determiningwhich sources are most effective in spreading information,or disinformation, as the case may be.Precisely because so much disinformation wasbeing spread unwittingly by well-meaning and entirelyinnocent folks, a lot of people concluded thatsomething had to be amiss with the “official”Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they said—somany good patriots wouldn’t beraising questions.And that brings us to a very realquestion: How many of those whohave been “raising questions” arereally “good patriots”?The truth is that a vast majorityof the Sandy Hook spin has comefromheretofore unknown sources,who still remain largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames, and whohelped put out much of the material early on,adding their own often-dubious commentary thathelped stir up suspicion in the first place.The behind-the-scenes powers-that-be haveclearly concluded that the Internet is a powerfulmechanism to control the course of debate withinpatriot ranks and have found that mixing mattersup by spreading unfounded and often silly rumorsis the best way to dilute serious inquiry. And basedupon what we’ve seen in the wake of Sandy Hook,this very real conspiracy seems to be succeeding—all too well.And what is so cunning is that the real conspiratorshave utilized Sandy Hook to drive a deepwedge that’s split the patriot movement fromwithin. Veteran patriots say they’ve never seen anythinglike it in all their long years.

Thanks to the Orwellian manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief inSandy Hook as having been a massive hoax is essentiallybeing instituted as a virtual litmus test as to “who’s a real patriot and who isn’t.”Those who don’t believe Sandy Hook was amassivehoax are denounced as having been “bribed,blackmailed, or coerced” or just having simply“changed sides.”In short, Sandy Hook has effectively emerged asa cult, with a built-in theology that cannot be questioned.To raise any doubts about the foundation ofthe cult is considered heresy. And anyone whodoubts the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories is beingportrayed as a “traitor to the patriot movement.”One longtime critic of gun control was accusedof lending support to pro-gun control forces because he believed children were killed at SandyHook—a total disconnect, of course, but illustrativeof the kind of mindset that is setting in place.Another was accused of being “pro-Obama” because he doubted the Sandy Hook theories.It’s almost like Alice in Wonderland.If there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’sthis: There’s more to Sandy Hook than even themost dedicated conspiracy theorists understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.” ——Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and, of course, theUnited States.
American Free PressInternet Rife With Disinformation• “ Cyber shills” working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers
BEHIND THE SCENESMichael Collins Piper

Evidence suggests patriots and truthseekers are being subjected to insidious
means of mind control—and crowd control—through a covert campaign now
being orchestrated across the Internet.

Consider this: Right after 9-11, AFP correspondent Victor Thorn demonstrated that the U.S. government version of what happened to United Flight
93 on 9-11 was an absolute lie, and that the plane
was deliberately shot down by the government.

Yet, today, there is an ongoing push to flood the
Internet and independent media with a never-before-seen genre of thought that holds, essentially,
that nothing reported in the establishment press is
“for real”—that every traumatic event is, to one degree or another, a big hoax.

Here’s the problem: Had this mindset held sway
after 9-11, it would have been alleged there never
even was a United Flight 93, that it neither crashed
nor was shot down and that those who died on the
plane never existed and that their survivors (and
some of the witnesses interviewed by Thorn) were
paid actors—referred to as “crisis actors” in this new
genre—deployed to misdirect honest investigators.

The
Internet would have been rife with accusations that Thorn’s revelations
were actually part of
the cover-up and, as a consequence, many good
folks might have doubted AFP’s credibility.
Fortunately, most people see through such nonsense. However, this new
“meme” (that nothing is real) is catching hold among many who don’t
realize that ongoing efforts to impose this worldview—almost a cult-like
ideology—on truth seekers is a
very real conspiracy designed to undermine diligent reporting of the
type seen in AFP.

Unfortunately, many are falling into this carefully
crafted trap.

A bevy of
disinformation specialists
known as “cyber shills”—along with amateur keyboard detectives caught up
in the frenzy—are bombarding patriots with all manner of outlandish
“analysis” of photographs and videos, purporting to
“prove” some point that is invariably a total distraction from the real
facts that should be unveiled.

This does harm to the serious efforts of those
who are trying to expose the very real conspiracies
and cover-ups surrounding 9-11, the Oklahoma City
bombing, the JFK assassination, the Boston bombing and so many matters hidden behind the media
monopoly’s iron curtain of censorship.

Note: AFP is here to tell readers that there’s
more to the story of shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and at the Washington Navy Yard
and to the Boston Marathon bombing than many of
the Internet sensationalists are telling you.

In
truth, many still do not understand the big secret about Sandy Hook: In
the face of the predictable
media push for gun control following that tragedy,
there was an obvious conspiracy by Internet provocateurs to misdirect
patriots into thinking they were
fighting gun control by repeating stories that “no children died” when,
in fact, such claims made Second Amendment advocates look ridiculous.

Serious-minded Second Amendment advocates
were arguing, of course, that guns in the hands of
teachers and staff at Sandy Hook Elementary could have saved the lives of those who were massacred.

On April 28—at website newswithviews.com—respected patriot Devvy Kidd put it in perspective:

Over the past nearly two decades, every time
some horrific “event” happens, wanna-be “journalists” come out of the woodwork with their
conspiracy theories based on absolutely nothing;
bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank
speculation. [These are] irresponsible people out
to make a name for themselves or to get people
to their websites. They have zero credibility and
hurt the rest of us by being lumped together
[with us]. I have debunked conspiracy theories
in the past based on documentation. I get attacked as if I’m the bad guy for pursuing the
truth. There are conspiracies and cover-ups, but
we want the truth, not speculation.

For years,
AFP has been smeared for publishing what critics call “conspiracy
theories,” which are, in fact, truthful reporting of high-level
misdeeds. Those trying to discredit revelations about the real
conspiracies do all they can to make AFP and others who expose those
conspiracies and the truth about mind control appear to be “nut jobs.”
That’s
why, in 2008, University of Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein—a
Barack Obama crony—issued a formal crisis management paper on
“conspiracy theories,” outlining a proposed pro- gram of what he called “cognitive infiltration” to discredit such theories, particularly those implicating Israel in 9-11.
And while such “Judas goat” operations have been going on for years, involving, for example, the FBI’s infamous ADL-assisted COINTELPRO—targeting
the Ku Klux Klan, the National States Rights Party, the Minutemen and
other dissidents—we know of one current Internet-focused scheme exposed
by Thorn in AFP. Reporting that the Israeli government pays young
Israelis $2,000 a month to troll the Internet and spread disinformation,
Thorn noted that this connivance is well coordinated:

Participants
are provided with specific scripts to use on enemies, complete with
details involving sensationalized accusations against enemies,
divide-and-conquer strategies where one individual is pitted against
another, plus a variety of distraction techniques and the
marginalization of opinions that differ from the official Jewish party
line. Other tactics include denying inconvenient facts, refusing
dialogue by sending conversations off into absurd directions, or
dishonestly manip- ulating sources to entrap a foe.

Programmed
to capture the imagination of sincere truth seekers, these
manipulations—aimed at a receptive “captive audience”—are intrigues
designed, as Thorn noted, to not only redirect debate by countering
conspiracy theories but also by inserting ridiculous disinformation into
the debate.

This further discredits any and all conspiracy theories—which happens to be the ultimate purpose of this multi-faceted effort.

Implementing
Sunstein’s treacherous mind-control agenda, crisis management experts
recognized that Internet-active truth seekers constitute a “crowd” as
defined by Gustave LeBon’s sinister study—The Crowd—a
legendary work described as having “exerted a powerful influence upon
the thought of men aiming to understand the workings of collective
behavior and of social psychology.”

Remembering
what LeBon said—“To know the art of impressing the imagination of
crowds is to know at the same time the art of governing them”— Sunstein
set in motion an Orwellian framework for both mind control and crowd
control all too visible on the Internet today.

AFP
pledges to ignore their disinformation and focus on the big picture and
continue to confront the real issues with facts, not speculation.

—— Michael Collins Piper
is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken
in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

The Piper Report Jan 25, 2014
note from MCP–
I return for a 2 hour exposition on ‘Fetzerism,’ beginning with a complete run-down of the debate history and of Jim Fetzer’s “pilpulism” regarding my purported health hoax (or hoaxes).
I have included even a quote from Pete Papaherakles regarding Fetzer’s smears of AFP being an “op” and even one from Willis Carto (who laughed at the opportunity to say something, really giving Fetzer Hell.)
Wonder what this Fetzer Freak will have to say about that?
I contacted both Pete and Willis before the broadcast (which was pre-recorded) and got their quotations with their full knowledge that I would be quoting them on the broadcast.
All credit is due Pete in taking on Dr. Fetzer and rejecting his claim that AFP is an “op.”
Let’s have a “here here” for Pete.
I hope John Tiffany will sing out in approval.
I’m very sorry that John Friend’s “friendship” appears to be in doubt, further feeding fuel to a lot of fires that he’s already set all over the “truth” and “white nationalist” movement(s).
When Julia Foster and John Tiffany and I started to work for The SPOTLIGHT we underwent lie detector tests (I went the the sophisticated voice stress analysis kind; I think Julie and John underwent the old fashioned kind). I’m starting to think perhaps we need to re-institute that. (The tests really make you think that you are a bad ass and make you doubt yourself! I don’t suggest them as pleasurable prospects for anybody. But I sure would be curious to see what would come out of a test of John Friend!)
I also spent a few minutes giving an overview of how much Fetzer’s so-called “contribution” to the JFK debate is really just a compilation of the work of others . . . Fetzer was a fraud from the start.
Have fun listening. Consider all the crap you people have listened to (or, pardon me, even engaged in) regarding Sandy Hook, it might not hurt for you to take two hours and 20 minutes and listen to MY crap. You might even hear something you haven’t already heard or it might clarify something you’d never thought of before.
I’m not too vulgar—a few god damns here and there, but not in a loud Fetzer-style way—and I must surely, at least, invite someone to go to Hell (although I wouldn’t swear to that).
Cordially,
Big Heart (MCP) Download Here
THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM

Piper starts the show talking about Robbie Parker’s alleged fake tears
over the loss of his daughter Emily Parker in the Sandy Hook shooting.
Michael mentions the ruthless insults and verbal attacks he has received
by not buying into these Sandy Hook conspiracy theories. Later on in
the show Michael moves on to the Jewish lies used to rally support
against the Muslims.

Piper discusses how the recent gun control controversy is a distraction.
The Jewish Elite (who benefit from higher gun sales) have little
interest in gun control but rather keeping us divided over issues that
have little significance to them.32k CF Download

What
allegedly happened on December 14, 2012, at Sandy Hook Elementary School
in Newtown, Connecticut, where 20 elementary school children were
massacred along with several adults, left the nation in a state of
shock.

However,
from the second the alleged event happened, the mainstream media began a
barrage of reporting, 95% of which was absolutely wrong. This
pathetic—or purposefully confused—reporting left truth-seekers, already
distrustful of any official story coming from the United States federal
government or from the controlled press, crying foul. And why not? As of
the publication of this 32-page booklet in late January 2013, not a
single solid fact has emerged from any official source proving what
really happened inside Sandy Hook Elementary.

Who is
Adam Lanza? What guns were actually used to commit the crime? Who were
those other suspects arrested? What about the ever-changing stories
offered by eyewitnesses? What about the very specific but inevitably
incorrect mainstream news reporting? Was it designed to rope “Sandy Hook
truthers” into speculation? Is there even more to the story? Is there
more to the agenda?

Dave Gahary moderates a debate between Keith Johnson and Jim Fetzer, who tackle the controversy surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event.Keith Johnson,
an investigative journalist, radio talk show host and editor of Revolt
of the Plebs, has for 17 years worked as a private investigator and
polygraph examiner for several Fortune 500 companies and prominent law
firms.James H. Fetzer,
a former Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical
foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial
intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.McKnight
Professor Emeritus at U of M Duluth, he has conducted research into the
JFK assassination, 9/11, and Sen. Wellstone's death.Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).Jim is a contributor and editor at Veterans Today and hosts a radio show, "The Real Deal", M/W/F Debate-page

Soft-spoken
yet extremely hard-hitting, Deanna Spingola is one of the most popular
independent voices in the alternative media today. Her radio broadcasts
have been “must” listening for truth seekers around the world, and her
books in... more

Deanna talked about
her ongoing research into the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting and
her critique of the video presentation given by Sophia Smallstorm
regarding what may or may not have happened in Newtown, Connecticut on
December 14, 2012. (MP3)
Related: Notes and Resources for the Sandy Hook Shootings
Unraveling Sofia Smallstorm’s Video on Sandy Hook, Part 1, Part 2

The esteemed Professor Fetzer correctly states that it is necessary to revise hypotheses in the
light of new evidence. But what "evidence"? Extraordinary claims
demand extraordinary evidence, and he has never presented any evidence
against the official Sandy Hook narrative. A few reporting errors, glitches with
Google's date logs, attempts at practising psychiatry without a license, and
unsubstantiated, unbridled speculation that makes Inspector Clouseau look the
consummate professional, does not constitute evidence.
For example, an article entitled "Sandy Hook: The curious case of Emilie Parker"
was posted on January 14, 2013 by
"Dr. Eowyn". But the comment by "Rich in NJ" on that page [i] is dated December 14, 2012 - a month before the article
was posted!
Anyone who watches this video [ii] of Benjamin Wheeler's parents and
sincerely thinks they
are "faking" their distress is obviously suffering from some sort of autistic
spectrum disorder. Have Fetzer and Friend actually seen it? It's bad enough
that these people must reveal their grief to the world as they fill in for
Obama's weekly address, but to have Sunstein shills (who lie and pose as retards
and cranks in order to prop up the official 9/11 conspiracy theory) accusing
them of faking it is beyond the pale.
Ben Wheeler's uncle Andrew "Drew" Wheeler [iii] is a scuba
dive instructor and underwater videographer [iv] from Hawaii. He has a website
for which the domain was created in April 2003 [v], and messages about him
posted on an internet forum in 2009 [vi] refer to his plans to document the Great Pacific garbage
patch (aka "Pacific trash vortex") that summer.
The Sandy Hookers should state which of the following they believe:

Andrew Wheeler is a fictitious person, but in order to make his online
presence appear realistic, Sandy Hook Hoaxers created his website's domain
in April 2003, had other conspirators post about him on internet forums -
e.g., in 2009, obtained a photograph of a person to use on his website, and
tricked or persuaded various newspapers into using another photo of the same person in
reports stating that he traveled to Connecticut in December 2012.

Although Andrew Wheeler loves his island lifestyle, he was inexplicably
recruited as a "crisis actor", a job that involved him traveling from Hawaii
to Connecticut to pose as the uncle of one of the "fake" victims, as part of
an operation to back up a false Sandy Hook narrative.

A "crisis actor" resembling Andrew Wheeler was hired to travel to Sandy
Hook and pose as Wheeler, with backup plans to shoot or otherwise eliminate
the real Andrew Wheeler if he ever found out about it and talked, and a
second backup plan to shoot anyone who found out that Wheeler had been
killed, and a third backup plan to shoot Wheeler's killer if he talked, and
so on, with another series of backup plans to shoot the "crisis actor" if
he talked, along with thousands of conspirators bribing, blackmailing and
threatening thousands of co-conspirators to play their part in the plot.

And whichever the Sandy Hooker selects, he or she must provide evidence to
prove it. Otherwise, the Sandy Hook "hoax" theories can be consigned to the
garbage bin, for once and for all.
Fetzer "knows" that the children's deaths were "faked"
(after claiming they were killed by a three-man Mossad hit team!), yet he and his team
of 'researchers' don't know whether their relatives actually exist. Shouldn't Fetzer
and friends first determine whether or
not the bereaved family members exist, before declaring that they are willing
participants in a money-making fraud or are simply roles played by crisis
actors?
How long will it be before Fetzer and friends assert that no one died
on 9/11/01 and the WTC buildings never collapsed? The difference between that
and their current position of no-planes-on-9/11 and no-one-killed-at-Sandy-Hook
is less than the width of a cigarette paper.
Real conspiracies do occur. Israel's central role in 9/11 can be proven to
the same certainty as two plus two equals four [vii], and there is no doubt that
Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty, and the Mossad has carried out
plenty of false-flag terror attacks such as London 7/7/05 and Amman 11/9/05.
Similarly, the official account of WWII is not consistent with the laws of
thermodynamics, thermochemistry, and ultimately probability. As long as Sunstein
shills and their misguided followers post outrageous conspiracy theories that
anyone with an ounce of commonsense will instantly recognize as crazy, genuine
research into conspiracies will be discredited by association.

http://www.takeourworldback.com/fetzersunstein.htm

Jim Fetzer, who was already known to be operating a
"campaign of disinformation" in July 2001, was the ideal person, with his expertise in epistemology and cognitive
systems, to head
Sunstein's team of shills, designed to make truth-seekers look crazy by
the team's cognitive infiltration of patriot groups and posing as "nuts"
with a "crippled" epistemology.

Top Ten Reasons: Jim Fetzer and Friends are Sunstein Shills

In an article Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax by Dr.
Fetzer et al, the Fetzerians exhibit an uncharacteristic flash of logic
with statements about "the totality of the
evidence" and the probability of hypotheses. For example, "The
hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the
preferable, which, when the evidence has 'settled down,' is acceptable as true
in the tentative and fallible fashion of science".
Here are the "top ten" reasons that support the conclusion that the
leading proponents of
Sandy Hook hoax / no-plane 'theories' are Sunstein shills.
1) The Sandy Hook hoax theorists (Sandy Hookers) promote outrageous claims such as 28 deaths were faked, 20 children
must pretend to be dead for the rest of their lives, some of these children
attended the Super Bowl by mistake instead of playing dead, dozens or hundreds of crisis actors
were hired to play the part of bereaved family members, the mass killings were merely
part of a
drill, and there was foreknowledge of the "drill". Their
'evidence' consists of the opinions of some YouTube commentators who think the relatives
should be shedding more tears, or shouldn't give a nervous laugh when preparing to face the
cameras. Or some internet 'detectives' spot a few glitches with Google's date logs,
and cite it as 'proof' that dastardly Sandy Hook conspirators slipped up and
made an error that only these latter-day Sherlocks were clever enough to spot.
If the events at Sandy Hook were a result of government chicanery, such
as an exploitation of Adam Lanza's "significant mental health issues", then the
investigation has been derailed by the Sandy Hookers' mass circulation of
outlandish claims about faked deaths, fake family members and a fake killer.
Unsurprisingly, the fakery claims have been
robustly refuted.
And whilst denying the abundance of evidence supporting the
official Sandy Hook narrative as broadly correct, the Sandy Hookers are
frequently found trying to sell other preposterous conspiracy
claims such as no-planes-hit-the-World-Trade-Center, WTC-was-nuked,
space-beam-weapon-zapped-WTC, and Boston-bomb-amputees-faked-injuries. For example,
Jim Fetzer is a no-planer and claims
mini-nukes demolished the WTC. Disinformation brokers such as Fetzer, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Simon Shack, Max Konrardy, Morgan
Reynolds, John Lear, Dave Shayler, John Friend and Judy Wood have skills
such as writing, video production, flying and spying, and at least four of them
qualified as professors (as did Cass Sunstein). One professor becoming senile and postulating crackpot
hypotheses about space-based beam weapons, faked planes or faked deaths could be
considered unlucky, two a coincidence, but three or four is a conspiracy.
Members of the general public who take a casual look at "conspiracy theories"
will encounter the lunatic claims of these professors, and will conclude that if
no-planers, mini-nukers and Sandy Hook / Boston bombings deniers are
indicative of the truth movement's finest brains, then there is no need for
further investigation and no need to doubt the government account of events such as 9/11.
Similarly, when dozens of people have skills in writing, video
production, flying,
spying, etc., demonstrating that they are not retards or lunatics, and
these people are promoting ideas that are so at odds with the evidence
that only retards
or lunatics
could possibly subscribe to them, then there is a contradiction that is
resolved
only by
assuming that these people are liars who pretend to be crazy. There is
not only no evidence that no
planes hit the WTC, or that the Sandy Hook deaths were "faked"; there
is also no
credible motive for anyone to believe such ridiculous ideas. There are,
however,
powerful motives for them to lie: tribal loyalty, bribery, blackmail,
bullying,
and a misguided belief that they are being patriotic by serving as
government assets
who counter "conspiracy theorists" by infiltrating truth-seeking circles
and
acting as if they believe the most outrageous bovine excrement.
2) A professor who is an "expert" in "critical
thinking" - as he's been telling everyone for decades
- should surely comprehend that it's
much easier for perpetrators of false-flag terror to crash a Boeing into a
building (especially with DovZakheim
and Daniel Lewin on the team) rather than
have to fake it with phony videos or invisible, inaudible aircraft capable of
projecting
Fetzer's postulated "sophisticated hologram[s]"
to fool hundreds or thousands of eyewitnesses into imagining they saw a plane or
planes crashing into the WTC, and to fool billions who would later see the
footage,
and planting of assorted physical evidence without anyone seeing or hearing the
fakers. This evidence includes a 255-pound piece of wreckage
"later identified as a trailing edge flap support structure from a Boeing 767",
with it needing to be wedged between an apartment building and a mosque, to be
finally removed twelve years later in 2013 in a two-hour operation using a
pulley system, a
fuselage
fragment on the roof of
WTC5, landing gear at the corner of West and Rector Streets and also in an
exterior panel knocked free from WTC1, aircraft
parts embedded in the back of a car, and an American Airlines plane seat and
life vest at the roof level of 130 Liberty Plaza (Deutsche Bank Building). And the fakers would need to create
impact holes in the WTC facade matching the
silhouette of a Boeing 767 by using cleverly placed shaped charges, guaranteed
to detonate at the right instant. The probability of being able to blow out the
correct shape is about zero.
Even if you try to imagine a "parallel world" in which Fetzer is telling the
truth and the WTC planes were faked, the problem is that it requires a
population that is so dumbed-down and a government that is so competent and
technically proficient, that the government would be able to exploit and enslave
the citizens as they pleased without having to go to all the trouble of faking planes and
staging false-flag terror. Just round them up, give them some pills and put them
in labor camps, they get all the water they need (as per the Guantanamo Bay
prisoners), rations as long as they perform their work, and tell them it's
perfectly normal and even desirable. The population would need to be so stupid
as to fail to see or hear "hologram-projector" planes flying away, or fail to
understand that it discredits the official story. And they would have to fail to
see or hear government agents smashing aircraft debris into the back of cars or
into walls or roofs, before the plane was supposed to have crashed. Or, again,
fail to recognize that it is inconsistent with the government's version of events.
On the whole, governments - in our world, in this reality - are not supremely
competent. Presidents can't always get away with relatively straightforward
schemes, such as bugging their opponents. Or having sex with some woman who
happens to be a co-religionist of the prime minister who arrived
in Washington three days after
news broke of the scandal, ostensibly for talks regarding the West
Bank, but most likely trying to blackmail the president into taking part in a
false-flag operation. Especially when the prime minister keeps in "close touch"
with a friend and co-religionist who obtained a 99-year lease on a couple of
towers and secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against
terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904
"per occurrence", and including
property damage and business interruption, six weeks before the buildings were
destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. And especially when
one of the target floors (94 of WTC1) has already had the "upgraded"
fireproofing installed, it's due to be installed later that year on
four more contiguous
floors in the target zone, compatriots of the
prime minister have already set up "moving
companies" that operate in
the states (NJ and NY) through which the fireproofing is to be transported, the
prime minister has already "predicted" that "Islamist" terrorists
would demolish the building, and "coincidentally" happens to be
ex-Sayeret Matkal,
an MIT alumnus, and lived in
Denver and Jerusalem, the very same as one of the passengers on the plane
that, three years later, was to fly into the building 102 minutes before it
collapsed. A plane, incidentally, from which one of the so-called "hijackers"
later turned up alive and well, and said his passport had been stolen
in 1995 when his Denver apartment was burgled. (And just for good measure, the woman also happens to be a
co-religionist of Cass Sunstein, Gordon Duff, the late Julius Springer, and
other principal players in these intrigues.)
Mossad agents are relatively competent, and yet Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner
and Yaron Shmuel let themselves get so carried away with celebrating the first
plane impact that
they made a spectacle of themselves high-fiving, hugging each
other, flicking a lighter, and appearing "visibly happy on nearly all" of the 76
photographs that they had taken and were subsequently developed by the FBI. They
knew that their co-religionists' control of the media and ability to pull
strings in Washington would be their get-out-of-jail-free card.
The no-planes nonsense has been thoroughly debunked many times by people with
professional experience in video production,
and it is clear that any proponent of no-planes is either a lunatic or a liar.
A professor who qualified in history and philosophy of science would
surely be aware that a "micro-nuke" or "mini-nuke" produces an EMP and radioactive
fission products, and that it is not possible to incorporate devices into
satellites that can fire "direct energy" beams with a power output in
excess of the total power consumption of humankind. He would also be
aware that when another professor makes a claim about beam weapons being used to
demolish the WTC, yet doesn't even bother to do energy calculations and is easily refuted by a competent
scientist, and was reportedly in a coma for
six years, then her 'theories' are clearly not to be taken
seriously. When Fetzer says that he supports Judy Wood's 'research' but
doesn't necessarily
endorse her 'theories', Fetzer reveals his deception just as surely as
if he'd
given her his full backing.
The best explanation for Fetzer's behavior is that he is a highly intelligent
man who simply cannot believe that the government could be involved in massive
conspiracies such as 9/11. So he remains a government loyalist, his confirmation
bias, flawed
epistemology and world-view leads him to imagine that
all so-called "conspiracy theorists" are "goof-balls", and he believes he's
being patriotic in helping the government counter the conspiracy theorists by
promoting nonsensical claims about faked planes and faked deaths, effectively
parodying the real patriots and truth-tellers. Since Fetzer thinks that
conspiracy theorists are all a bunch of nuts, he isn't particularly concerned if
his claims have not even a shred of credibility. He knows that he's helping to
trash the image of those perceived by the wider audience as conspiracy
theorists or "twoofers", and he thinks he's doing the right thing.
3) A January 2008 paper by Cass Sunstein provides an example
of a recent "conspiracy theory" and contends that believers in such theories
create "risks":
"...the belief [...] that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out [...] by Israel
or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create
serious risks, including risks of violence..."
The "risks" are not to ordinary members of the public, as Sunstein would like
people to believe, but to the true perpetrators of 9/11 and those involved in
the cover-up, i.e., Sunstein and his pals, following an independent
investigation, prosecutions, and fair trials.
According to Sunstein, the "best" way that "such theories might be undermined
[...] consists of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups." Sunstein claims
that "those who subscribe to such theories" do so because they have a "crippled
epistemology".
Sunstein needs infiltrators who will mimic the silliest type of "conspiracy
theorist" imaginable, by selectively accepting information only from the likes
of John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, Mike Powers / Hollingsworth and others
who are part of the deception. A higher level infiltrator (e.g. Fetzer) will
build his crippled epistemology using John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, etc., as its
foundation, and will use the argument from authority fallacy against his
critics, e.g., "Do you
consider yourself as qualified as John Lear to address these issues?" Thus,
these infiltrators will act the role of an individual
whose epistemology is so "crippled" that they become parodies of genuine
truth-tellers.
In Sunstein's discussion of whether government should choose to ignore or rebut
a "conspiracy theory", he points out that the disadvantage for the government in
rebutting a particular theory is that it may "legitimate" the theory, and
a theory may gain rather than lose adherents when it is perceived as sufficiently plausible
that the government needs to counter it. Sunstein recommends a strategy of
"rebutting many conspiracy theories" because this yields a "synergistic gain"
for the government from reducing "the legitimating effect of rebutting any
one
of them".
Since Sunstein can hardly fail to be aware that Israel did 9/11, he knows that his best
strategy is to introduce many new conspiracy theories, each of them with various
degrees of craziness, but they all need to be crazier than the government's own
9/11 conspiracy theory
of nineteen hijackers with box cutters. Thus, Sunstein
recommends a policy of countering multiple theories and "cognitive
infiltration"
of truth seekers, and the disinformation agents promote preposterous
theories such as no-one-died-on-9/11, no-planes-hit-the-WTC,
WTC-was-nuked, and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook. Other agents can knock
down these
straw men, and will attempt to counter those who tell the facts about
9/11.
Theories such as no-planes and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook are promoted so
strongly that they appear more popular than evidence-based theories about
Israel's central role in 9/11. Government benefits from the "synergistic gain"
obtained from not legitimating a particular theory, specifically, Israel's
orchestrating of 9/11. Third-parties (the mass audience) form the impression
that "conspiracy theorists" are all a bunch of fruitcakes who think the 9/11
planes were holograms, the WTC was nuked, no children died at Sandy Hook, and "crisis actors"
pretended to be bereaved family members.
4) Jim Fetzer has authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited several books concerned with
epistemology and cognition. Moreover, a number of these books were published by
Springer, the company founded by Julius Springer, who was a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein.
These include:

Sunstein needed someone to manage "cognitive infiltration designed to
break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracy-minded groups". Who better than
a professor whose expertise is in epistemology and cognition? Moreover, Fetzer had already
been flagged as operating a "campaign of disinformation" prior to 9/11/01,
and "he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and
then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'."
A professor smart enough to understand epistemology, probability and the
philosophical aspects of cognitive systems would not be foolish enough to
imagine that a video (e.g., the infamous September Clues) that makes
ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims is a more reliable source of knowledge than a
plethora of evidence such as aircraft debris, eyewitnesses, photographs, video
and news reports, especially when the video producer's father served as a
controlled opposition Judas Goat to help counter allegations of collusion between
government members and the Mafia, and whose brother's Formula One racing career
was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden. And he would know that a woman who was
in a coma for six years and rambles on about space-based directed energy weapons is not a
reliable source, when the energy required to
vaporize (or "dustify") the steel in the Towers is hundreds of terajoules,
and the "weapon" would need to sustain a power output over ten seconds in excess
of the total power output of humankind.
He would not be foolish enough to take at face value an ex-pilot's
claims about Flight 175's speed and impact being "physically impossible", especially when
the claims have been proven wrong,
and the ex-pilot used to fly missions for the CIA and other government agencies and
discredits himself with claims about the Moon having a breathable atmosphere and
"forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, [and] civilizations".
He would understand that cherry-picking of information sources,
e.g., blindly believing garbage propaganda videos that are intended to deceive such
as September Clues, and believing the claims of an 'ex'-CIA pilot and an
'ex'-Bush Admin member, whilst rejecting more reliable sources, will lead to
crazy conclusions typical of an individual with a crippled epistemology, and
that such an approach can be used to parody the wackiest type of conspiracy
theorist imaginable. Thus, Professor James H. Fetzer is ideally qualified for a
leading position on Sunstein's team of cognitive infiltrators.
5) Fetzer is not an honest debater. He has a system for
controlling debates on his forum when it's not going well for him - he bans his
opponent and closes the comments!
As mentioned above, Fetzer's "sophisticated hologram" scenario
requires invisible, inaudible plane(s) to project the "hologram-plane". One
problem for the fakers is the matter of getting the correct Doppler shift for
the engine roar, so that observers would hear, and amateur videos would record,
the appropriate sound for the location. For example, listen to the engine roar on this
video at around 04:15, seconds before Flight 175 smashes into WTC2 at
approximately 590 mph. The camera is located well to the south of the Tower, and
so the pitch audibly decreases as the plane passes overhead, slightly to the
left of the camera. The decrease in pitch is typical of a plane passing
roughly overhead. However, for an observer to the north of WTC2, the Doppler
effect would be much less. Although the angle of the plane's approach changes
slightly since it's hundreds of feet overhead, it never goes from approaching to receding from the observer.
See around 07:50 on the same video
for an example of that.
One option for the fakers would be to plant several very large, invisible
loudspeakers, with inbuilt invisible amplifiers and an array of invisible
batteries (or invisible cable going off to a mains power source) at various locations
on the streets of Manhattan, which is of course impossible. Alternatively, the "projector-planes"
would have to
incorporate extremely powerful, directional
loudspeakers with excellent bass extension mounted on their exterior, whilst
capable of silent and invisible flight as these hypothetical planes speed away after the
"hologram-plane" has supposedly crashed. All of this assumes that sophisticated hologram
technology capable of fooling thousands of people is available, and was
available in 2001 - which it isn't, and wasn't.
Amusingly, when Fetzer was called on this by a poster at Veterans Today
named Rollo, Fetzer continued to dodge the question. After getting the
last word in with ad hominems on how Rollo was obviously a "goof-ball or
an op" who was "posting
rubbish" (simply because he disagreed with Fetzer's no-planes lunacy),
Fetzer banned Rollo from
responding and closed the comments on spurious grounds that Rollo did
not
"even know [Fetzer's] position"!
6) Eyvind Hytten, the father of September Clues disinformation broker Simon Shack/Hytten, was a government asset who
served as a controlled opposition, in order to counter the work of anti-Mafia
crusader Danilo Dolci, who accused prominent members of the government of
colluding with the Mafia. Moreover, the Formula One racing career of Simon's
brother Mario Hytten was sponsored
by Yeslam bin Laden.
Simon Hytten and his sidekick Max Konrardy aka hoi.polloi make
the most outrageous claims, such as no-one-died-on-9/11. Hytten and Konrardy's lies are too
crazy even for the likes of Jim Fetzer. On the one hand, Fetzer aims to appear just sufficiently wacky
with his support of no-planes and mini-nukes that he can be instantly
flagged as a crank by non-conspiracy-minded members of society, whilst fooling a
few gullible, simple-minded people whose saving grace is that they trust the
"truth movement" more than the government. On the other hand, Fetzer does not
want to appear so cuckoo that not even the shills will support
him.
Thus, outsiders can become aware of the garbage 'theories' of Simon Hytten and
Max Konrardy, and will reject 9/11 truth as full of paranoid lunatics who imagine
that everything about 9/11 was fake. And a few in the truth movement are taken in by Fetzer and friends,
thereby destroying cohesion within the group as energy is devoted to claim
and counter-claim of shilling, rather than exposing the perpetrators.
7) The Sandy Hookers attempt to substantiate their material by citing dubious
sources such as Mike "Powers" aka Mike Hollingsworth aka Entryman
aka Scorpion commander aka Jsteele7707, the suspected federal informant who tried to have
Charles Dyer / July4Patriot jailed on charges of attempting to blow up federal
buildings, before they managed to get him jailed for 30 years for "child abuse".
"Powers" is touted as a so-called "professional military investigator and
ballistics expert" by Fetzer & Co in Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax, and is also cited
by Alex Jones, who claims Israel could not have carried out 9/11.
8) It's already been established that Zionist operatives
post on the internet
under multiple aliases, sometimes attacking 9/11 truth, and at other times posting
crazy conspiracy theories to make "conspiracy theorists" look nuts. For
example, one particular YouTuber (who at the time of writing operates the
channel Oliver Terrance)
posed
as a dumb 16YO kid who
swooned over Alex Jones (whom he described as "a very good looking man"!) and
swallowed every crazy conspiracy theory under the sun: no-planes, WTC-was-nuked,
directed-energy-weapons-toppled-WTC, etc. But part of the time he would attack
9/11 truth; for example, he said ae911truth are "faggots", and he would get
praised by the likes of ctcole77. One of his channels was UnitedChildrenOfZion,
and he also revealed his true allegiance with statements such as "Zionism will
save us, shalom."
This was all going on prior to Sandy Hook in 2012. Then, unsurprisingly, this Oliver Terrance
character came out as a staunch supporter and promoter of Sandy Hook hoax /
"crisis actor" theories.
9) John Lear, a promoter of no-planes, is an 'ex'-CIA asset in the same manner
that Osama bin Laden was an 'ex'-CIA/Zionist asset. Lear, who has earned himself
a reputation as "everyone's favorite crackpot", makes other kooky
assertions, such as the Moon has "64%" of Earth's gravity, and an "atmosphere"
in the craters that is dense enough to breathe in. People are well aware that
"[John Lear] is a nut,
which is why ATA Airlines fired him as a pilot several years ago".
(Lear's story is that ATA fired him in 1989 for believing in flying saucers.) Thus, Lear further discredits
himself in the eyes of "normal" people who are simply unaware of conspiracies
and government crimes, and will induce that "truthers" are nuts.
But Fetzer cites this "nut" as an authority!!
The no-planer Dave Shayler, a transvestite who is obsessed with Kabbalah and
declares himself to be the
"Son of God", is an 'ex'-MI5 asset. This is another example of an
'ex'-Zionist asset
who will lead ordinary people to imagine that "truthers" are lunatics and
weirdoes.
The no-planer Morgan Reynolds is supposed to be an 'ex'-Bush Admin asset. What a
"coincidence" that Lear, Shayler and Reynolds all peddle the no-planes spiel and
are all supposed to be 'ex'-Zionist assets, who either retired or had some sort
of falling out with their old paymasters!
10)
In October 2012, Gordon Duff, of Jewish descent, actually admitted that 40% of
his writing was "at least purposely partially false", and that about 30% of the
material on Veterans Today is "patently false". Duff, billed as
"one of the top global intelligence specialists", is the Chairman on the VT
Editorial Board, and Jim Fetzer writes much of the
"patently false" nonsense that may be found there.

Are they right, lunatics or liars?

Returning to Dr. Fetzer's principles that we should
"Consider the totality of the evidence", and "The hypothesis that
confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable",
let's ask which is the preferable hypothesis:
1) That the 9/11 planes were holograms and/or eyewitnesses were paid
to lie, physical evidence was faked, video and images were faked,
and so on, when it would have been far simpler to crash planes into
buildings with Zakheim's Flight Termination Systems. And hundreds of
crisis actors were hired for Sandy Hook, children were paid or
threatened to pretend to be dead and not talk about it throughout
adulthood, in order that the government has a stronger case against
gun control and the construction industry gets a few million dollars
worth of work, when it is far simpler to wait until some lone nut
with a gun goes on the rampage and not have to pay off the
construction industry. And Mike Piper, Keith Johnson and Mark Glenn
are part of the conspiracy, paid to help cover up the government's
subterfuge.
2) That four professors turn from brilliant academics into raving
lunatics who are suffering from a "crippled epistemology" -
including one who has co-authored and edited books and papers on
epistemology, and another who specializes in media and
communications. They not only subscribe to crackpot 'theories' about
faked Boeings and faked deaths, but promote the ideas with an
evangelical fervor. And others who can make videos, write, fly, spy,
provide economics advice, etc., are also peddling garbage that is
believable only by the certifiably insane or someone whose internet skills would
amount to no more than replying, "Hello
Mommy" in an e-mail.
3) That four professors along with dozens of others, all of them
otherwise rational people whose confirmation bias precludes them
from seriously considering evidence of government conspiracies such
as Israel's central role in 9/11, agree to act the role of
epistemologically-challenged conspiracy theorists, in order to help
the government counter "extremist groups". The leader is selected
because of his expertise in epistemology and cognitive systems.
He understands how limiting his sources of information to a narrow
range of crackpots such as John Lear will enable him to act the role of one of
Cass Sunstein's hypothetical "conspiracy theorists" with a "crippled
epistemology". Another is recruited because of his knowledge of
media and communications.

Conclusion

It doesn't make sense that these esteemed professors should turn
into lunatics and inexplicably develop a bizarre evangelical zeal to
promote their crackpot theories, at the expense of making themselves
look stupid, and even facing calls to resign in the case of James
Tracy. It doesn't make sense that the government would hire hundreds
of crisis actors, or that thousands of conspirators would fake
videos and images, write CGI scripts, plant aircraft debris, pay
eyewitnesses to lie, etc., when they could simply wait for some lone
nut with a gun or crash planes into buildings. It does make sense
that otherwise intelligent people, with an ideological blind spot
that prevents them from
accepting that it wasn't Osama bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
who masterminded 9/11, would agree to help the government, probably
for a fee, by cognitive infiltration of "extremist groups".
The epistemologically-blinkered shills mistakenly perceive truth-tellers as "extremists"
with a "crippled epistemology".
And of course, many activists know that Israel did 9/11, but are
motivated by tribal loyalty to play the part of no-planes,
micro-nukes, Sandy-Hook-hoax and Boston-bombings-hoax theorists.
It is not hundreds or thousands of
"crisis actors" who faked deaths
and faked plane crashes. It is Fetzer, Reynolds, Wood,
Tracy, Hytten,
Konrardy, Friend and their colleagues who are acting and faking.
Fetzer & Co are government loyalists who don't subscribe to any
conspiracy theories. Fetzer and his friends think that the Arabs did
9/11, Oswald was a lone assassin, and Israel's attack on the USS
Liberty was an accident. And they think they're being patriotic by
operating as Sunstein shills, disinformation agents, Judas Goats,
and by lying, faking and acting as crazed conspiracy theorists. In
reality, Fetzer & Co are traitors. However, in their blinkered
world-view, Fetzer & Co imagine they're doing the right thing.
(In the case of some of these people, such as Dave Shayler and John Lear, the
jury is still out. If they're not nuts, they're putting on an excellent act. And
if they are nuts, how convenient! But
for those such as Fetzer, the evidence is that they're too smart to believe the
rubbish that they spout.)
When Dr. Fetzer meets up with his friends or old colleagues, he
doesn't need to play the role of a crackpot whose cognitive powers
are in decline, leading him to fall for preposterous hypotheses
whilst developing an irresistible urge to broadcast his weird
beliefs to the world. He simply tells them that his "applied
philosophical research" includes his role in infiltrating
"conspiracy theorists". After all, his friends and colleagues
probably imagine that all "conspiracy theorists" are nuts who think
the 9/11 planes and the Sandy Hook deaths were faked.
If we go
back to Fetzer's
pre-9/11 admission that "he begins by deciding what is the
truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'," this
is exactly how their scheme works. First they decide on a 'truth' such as
no-planes or Sandy-Hook-deaths-were-all-faked. Then the low-level shills - e.g.,
CIA, MI5, or Bush Admin assets (in the case of no-planes), or hasbara
trolls in the case of 'nuts' who seize on glitches in Google's Sandy Hook date
stamps - serve as the selective sources for the high-level shills such as Fetzer,
who will build their epistemologically-crippled personae with their crackpot
'theories' on the foundations of these liars and propagandists.
When the media reports on James Tracy's crazy theories about Sandy
Hook and the Boston bombings and he's facing calls for his
resignation, he'll tell the administrators that he's acting a role
for his conspiracy theories studies. Indeed, he needs to be as
belligerent as possible, not even receiving a
letter of reprimand until refusing for months to add a clear
disclaimer at his blog to confirm that his views are not those of
his university, and eventually relenting. (If they took no action
against him, his legend would look even more suspect.) Given that
Tracy is already on $64,650
per annum, there is no need for him to receive donations for his
spare-time activities. Yet
his website has a Donate
button, most likely a flypaper trap that gathers the names and
addresses of any patriots who are foolish enough to fall for it, for
the attention of government agencies.
Sunstein's best strategy
is to have a team of shills with wildly varying credibility, who start
out relatively good and then go downhill. If they're all like Fetzer and
post almost 100% bullshit, it's easy for
genuine patriots and truth-seekers to identify them. This tarnishes the
reputation of "conspiracy theorists" in the eyes of the mass audience
(the third
party), but doesn't achieve the shills' other aims of weakening morale
and sowing mistrust
and despondency in truth-seeking circles. When the Zionists put a lot
more investment into establishing an initial credibility, truth-seekers
are less able to distinguish the fakes from the real patriots, and the
counter-intelligence operatives
attain all of their objectives.
Sunstein would love truth-tellers to think that Fetzer, Shayler,
Reynolds, Lear & Co are part of their group - genuine, honest patriots who just
happen to be crazy, rather than actors posing as crazy, honest patriots by lying
and peddling bizarre claims.
In general, the various shills or disinformation agents
will initially
present themselves as relatively sane, genuine "truth-tellers", before
deteriorating into lunatics. Sunstein's strategy goes rather like this:
Each shill
is assigned a Starting Stupidity Number (SSN), with 10/10 being maximum
on the
stupidity scale. Over the months or years, the shill will progress along
the stupidity scale,
in effect, regressing or degenerating. At any given time, there are
plenty of "sleepers", ready to degenerate when the time is right.
For example, Jim Fetzer started at 8/10, based on how he would "accidentally"
plump for the craziest WTC demolition scenarios such as nukes or space beam weapons,
when other, far more reasonable scenarios were being advanced. People with
limited common sense and an aversion to
science might have been fooled into thinking that maybe the government had
developed a new, special type of small nuclear device, capable of reliable,
timely, controlled detonation whilst leaving no radioactive signature. Fetzer progressed to
9/10 as he became a keen no-planer, posting drivel about a Boeing 767 being
rather like a "flying empty beer can". He would
cite those such as 'ex'-CIA asset John Lear as an "expert" who would back his
claim that a Boeing 767 flying at approximately 590 mph whilst 1,000 feet above
sea level was "physically impossible". Lear, as a well-known crackpot who not only
supports no-planes but believes the moon to be inhabitable with a breathable
atmosphere in the craters, clearly had an SSN of 10/10.
Simon Hytten/Shack and Max
Konrardy/hoi.polloi would have been assigned an SSN of 9/10, based on their
peddling of no-planes propaganda. They later progressed to a stupidity factor of 10/10 with their
"vicsims"
imbecility, which claims that all 9/11 victims were faked.
Sofia Smallstorm began with a very low SSN on the basis of her 9/11
Mysteries video, which was reasonably good, but is now 9/10 or thereabouts after
showing her true colors with a deceptive Sandy Hooker propaganda video and
fully aligning with Fetzer and the rest of the disinformation gang. Eric Hufschmid's SSN was
also quite low;
he started out with a book and video shortly after 9/11. His stupidity rating
soon rocketed to 10/10 after he claimed people such as Ernst Zundel and Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad were secretly working for
the Zionists. As Hufschmid became an increasing irrelevance, he posted naked
rear-view pictures of himself on his website. We can only hope that Smallstorm
doesn't follow Hufschmid's example!
John Friend was installed as the token "white supremacist", whose criticisms
of organized Jewry would initially win him the confidence of some patriots and
qualify him for a fairly low SSN. After aligning himself with Fetzer and
becoming a no-planer and Sandy Hook denier, Friend advanced to 9/10 on the
stupidity scale. The ADL was readily able to denounce him as an "anti-Semite"
with "extreme views", and he serves as a brilliant example for
whenever they want to portray Judaism's critics as racist lunatics. As early as August
2012, Friend purportedly received a threatening e-mail from the JDL. Since Friend is not stupid enough to believe in no-planes,
he must be working for Cass Sunstein, the JDL, ADL or a similar organization.
Most likely the JDL, since they could then 'threaten' him in order to help
establish his legend, or "cred building", as a wise commentator said.
It is quite rare for a shill to be assigned an SSN of 10/10, but it does
happen. According to Dimitri Khalezov, each Tower was demolished by a 150
kiloton thermonuclear bomb that had been placed 50 meters (164 feet) below the
foundations when the Towers were built. Khalezov claimed the government (i.e.,
the Nixon Admin) was in on the plan, kept it a secret (i.e., successfully
prevented Washington Post or New York Times reporters from
uncovering the scheme), yet Soviet agents such as Khalezov became aware of it. And
Khalezov stated that, although the planes that crashed into the Towers were
really fake planes, New York officials believed them to be real. And because the
plane that hit the Pentagon was really a cruise missile, and because officials
had determined that it had an unexploded nuclear warhead, the New York officials
feared that the "planes" that crashed into the Towers were also carrying
unexploded nuclear warheads. And in order to save New York City from possible
atmospheric nuclear explosions, the City officials decided to detonate the 150
kt thermonuclear devices that were buried beneath the Towers. Khalezov didn't
explain why WTC7 was pulled. See
here for more
on Khalezov's particular brand of idiocy.
At any
given time, a shill may "expose" other shills who are higher on the stupidity scale. So Fetzer
exposes Hytten/Shack and his cronies, whose "vicsims" baloney made them a clear 10/10. Once a shill reaches 10/10, they can
do just about anything. Hytten has called Fetzer a shill.
In the same way that
government derives a synergistic gain from "rebutting many conspiracy theories", sincere truth-seekers
can avoid legitimizing one or two of the most obvious disinformation brokers by
rebutting many of them. However, it is now time for these shills to be
sidelined, ignored, and recognized for what they are: government stooges,
traitors and liars, for whom there can be no place in any truth or patriot movement.

Operation Halbig

Update (Feb. 21, 2014): For new information on Wolfgang Halbig (of Jewish
origin) and his pre-Sandy Hook trolling and attempt to solicit money, click
here.
Wolfgang Halbig, in his interview with Dave Gahary, suggests that Sandy Hook was a conspiracy because when the police arrived, "they" parked a quarter of a mile from the front
door of the school.
In fact, according to the information in the Connecticut
State's Attorney's Final Report, the first police officer
arrived at Crestwood "Road" (actually Crestwood Drive) behind
and to the south of the school at 9:39:00, three minutes and 21 seconds
after the first 911 emergency call was received by the Police Department. It's a
little over 100 feet from the south end, and about 600 feet from the front entrance, which is
still less than an eighth of a mile.

Halbig deceptively keeps waffling on with
misleading comments such as "Why would you park a quarter of a mile...?" yet
studiously avoids telling us that the next two police officers arrived a mere 13
seconds later - parking on the driveway near the ball field, barely more than a
hundred yards from the front entrance. And the police deliberately
decided to cover both approaches.
In any case, if a police car was approaching from the south, it's normally a two-minute
drive taking the long route from the
junction of Washington Avenue / Crestwood Drive around to the front entrance, whereas on foot from Crestwood
Drive, an officer would only need to do 6.82 mph in order to cover the 600
feet in a minute. Thus, even at high speed, there is little or no time advantage
from taking the long route.
The Connecticut Police Chiefs Association (CPCA) Final Report
states that the shift sergeant who was at the police station was among the first
responders. Whilst en route, he sent some units to the front and some to the
rear, as corroborated by radio recordings. "Local officers had knowledge
that Crestwood Drive passes within yards of the rear of the school."
The report provides an explanation as to why the police did not park very
close to the front door: "In analyzing the response, it is important to know the
accepted practice for officers responding to such a call. Officers arriving at
the school must do so in a manner that allows them quick access to the facility,
but must also be cognizant of their tactical positioning. Therefore, it is
expected that first arriving officers would park a reasonable distance from the
building in order to afford themselves the best view of the building and
surrounding space. This allows officers to begin assessing the status and
location of the threat. Officers are trained to prepare for more than one threat
or aggressor."
Halbig says [5:45], "And they're parking on Crest View, Crest something
Drive." If we overlook his errors of more than +100% in his distance calculations,
you'd think that Halbig would at least be able to get the name of the road
right, after supposedly "researching" Sandy Hook for more than a year.

Halbig suggests that another reason it's a conspiracy is that the paramedics
took too long to go in. As shown above, police were searching the building and
quickly triaging any victims they found. The EMS had not been cleared to
approach the building at this time (since the possibility of additional shooters
had not been ruled out), and an officer scooped up a critically injured child
and sprinted towards the EMS staging area.
And the Connecticut Final Report says that at 9:39:34, a Newtown officer encountered an "unknown male running along the
east side of SHES with something in his hand", and there were a number of
factors that gave the police valid reasons to suspect that there may have been
more than one shooter. The initial unknown male "turned out to
be a parent with a cell telephone in his hand". At 9:40:03, the last
gunshot was heard, believed to be the final suicide shot of Lanza in classroom
10.
Anyone still curious about Sandy Hook, who hasn't really looked into it much,
should read those reports and see if there is anything that proves an "elaborate
hoax", or if the response was reasonable given the circumstances.
It's all very well for Halbig, with the benefit of hindsight, to speculate that
the responders should have done some things differently. There is nothing to
suggest that the police or paramedics made mistakes, based upon the
information available to them at the time. But even if mistakes were made, that
is not evidence of a conspiracy, and would do nothing to override the
overwhelming evidence that Sandy Hook was a real massacre, not a
hoax or
a drill. And it's rather telling that no other expert in school safety
has come up with Halbig's objections and gone public over the last
fourteen months.
The only people who have are liars and cranks who claim the 9/11 planes
were
holograms and the Boston bombings were faked with smoke bombs and
amputee
actors.
Halbig says he started contacting the Newtown public schools, probably "two months
after the incident". He claims "the pieces don't fit", and asks why the
FBI would "classify" the Sandy Hook report. The answer is that shortly after the
incident it was already known that there was a flock of conspiracy loons all over the internet
who, given half a chance, would post images of the dead children on their blogs and YouTube videos,
harass the parents, and accuse them of being liars who were part of a massive conspiracy. So it's
not surprising that the authorities redacted some images, in order to spare the
grieving relatives from the nutbars' antics. Halbig claims the FBI has
never "classified" such a report before, but prior to Sandy Hook, there has never been a
troop of internet trolls trying to "prove" the relatives are liars and actors.
It doesn't prove Sandy Hook was a hoax.
Halbig complains his phone calls are not returned, implying that it's
evidence of a conspiracy. What does he expect - that hard-pressed officials
would continue to humor some conspiracy crank and crackpot who bombards them for
months on end with demands for evidence to prove Sandy Hook wasn't a hoax? What if they
kept receiving demands for evidence that would prove the earth isn't flat? Isn't
there some point at which they would lose patience?
According to Halbig, Sandy Hook was a "script" that was in the planning for
two to two-and-a-half years. Halbig claims that all sorts of things don't fit, but presents not
one shred of
credible evidence - nothing more than the misguided opinions of a paranoid conspiracy
theorist. Halbig claims he does not believe that any children died at SH,
revealing himself as a liar or a fool. The only way that anyone could
possibly be duped into thinking Halbig is raising some valid questions is if
they hadn't yet read the reports and were very generous in giving him the
benefit of the doubt. More than two dozen did die at Sandy Hook Elementary, and
the only killer was Adam Lanza.
In any case, all you really need to
know is that Wolfgang Halbig chose to go to American Free Press (AFP) rather than a
mainstream publication that would have given him more credibility with the
general public. His Facebook page shows that he has
a strong interest in the mainstream
media: FOX 35 news anchors Sonni Abatta, Bob Frier, Amy Kaufeldt and others,
The Washington Post, Newsweek, Time magazine, and Larry King.
He also links to George W. Bush's Facebook page.AFP has been
variously (and most unfairly) described as a "known
hate site, filled with anti-semitic and racist ideology", a
"conspiracy-oriented anti-Semitic newspaper",
a paper that "promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories",
and a "right-wing extremist publication". There are two possible explanations
for Halbig's choice.
Of course, the Sandy Hookers will claim Halbig couldn't go to the mainstream media
because they're all in on the "conspiracy". Let's look at the proceeds
from a hypothetical Sandy Hook "hoax". $49
million was allocated for demolition and reconstruction. Since such projects generally go over budget, it's unlikely that
there would be money left over to bribe newspaper bosses and hire "crisis
actors", etc. As of December 2013, there was some $12 million remaining to be
distributed, and much of that is to be allocated to "long-term
needs such
as providing mental health resources, scholarships for affected students
and funding for when Newtown comes to an agreement on a physical
memorial to the
victims". Some money went to an animal sanctuary, a local Boy Scout
troop, and to the gun-control lobby. The conspirators would also need to pay off hundreds of parents,
grandparents, aunts and uncles, cousins, schoolmates, colleagues and friends to
keep quiet for the rest of their lives, with the children having to play dead,
not go to the Super Bowl, and so on. "Lanza's" classmates would have
to be bribed to
pretend he existed, and those who didn't say anything would need to be bribed,
threatened, or killed to stop them from contradicting the others' statements.
The conspirators either had to pay for Andrew Wheeler's website's domain in
April 2003 and hire people to post on internet forums around 2009 as part of a
plot to fake his existence, or they had to hire a "crisis actor" to pretend to
be him, hope that the real Andrew Wheeler didn't find out, and pay an assassin
to stand by in Hawaii with instructions to shoot Wheeler if he was about to
talk. Or, if they got lucky, recruit Wheeler, somehow persuading him to suspend
his beloved island lifestyle for a new role as a "crisis actor". Then the
conspirators would have to pay off dozens or hundreds of other "crisis actors",
the Police Department, forensic scientists, the coroner, and anyone at Homeland
Security, BATF, the Connecticut Intelligence Center (CTIC) and other agencies
who had any doubts about the scheme.
Let's suppose (being very generous to the Sandy Hookers) that after siphoning
off money to bribe all these people, the fraudsters still have $1 million
remaining. And then they must
pay offThe Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, The Washington Post,
The New York
Times, The London Times, CNN, NBC, CBS, the BBC and countless thousands of other
national and local newspapers and radio / TV stations worldwide, each of whom
would love to have the scoop about any "hoax" at Sandy Hook. As of 2010,
it is reckoned there were 14,853 newspaper titles worldwide.
Just to be even more generous to the Sandy Hookers, let's forget TV and radio, and
say that 4,853 or almost one in three of the newspapers are "conspiracy-oriented",
which is a ridiculously generous assumption. If there are 10,000 mainstream
newspapers to bribe to keep quiet, so that it's worth their while to miss out on the Sandy Hook "hoax" story,
that leaves $100 per newspaper before
we
count transaction costs, telephone costs, etc. And how much would a newspaper be
willing to pay for such a scoop - $10,000? $100,000? $1 million? Whilst they
accept less than $100 to give up their chance to make big money? Then there is
the risk that some party involved in the negotiations with ten thousand
newspapers would talk, or anyone tapping any one of the tens of thousands of
telephone calls, or any of the "crisis actors", relatives,
colleagues, classmates, police, forensic scientists, the coroner, the uncle in Hawaii, the assassin in Hawaii ready to
shoot the uncle, etc.
And this supposes that all the proceeds are used to pay off the tens of
thousands of conspirators. Thus, the "hoaxers" do not stand to make any profit
from the scheme, and, moreover, must also borrow or put up their own money,
years before even a cent came rolling in. The Sandy
Hook "hoaxers" would have to be terribly incompetent buffoons with no
understanding of business or investment, who are prepared to lose money
(after interest charges and inflation) in return for the certainty of getting
caught and going to jail for fraud, since there would always be some media
outlets who would demand more than $100 for their silence.The reality is that no mainstream newspaper would give any column-inches to a
fringe conspiracy theorist with no evidence. Halbig wanted to restrict circulation to spare
himself embarrassment. And by going to a "conspiracy-oriented" newspaper, the wider audience of non-conspiracy-minded folk
will see that he's
just playing games with the "conspiracy nuts". This is the very way
they would
play it if he was recruited to work for Sunstein to pose as a nutjob
"conspiracy
researcher". So Wolfgang "Walter Mitty" Halbig does all he can to
antagonize the cops for months on end, starting from February 2013,
effectively
accusing them of not doing their job properly. Then, after ten months,
they
eventually go round to his house "in plain clothes [...] right before
Christmas
[...] about 10:00 a.m." for a "15, 20 minutes" meeting to tell him that
they won't stand for it any more, and they'll file harassment
charges if he keeps wasting police time.
Thus, if we accept his tale of the police going to his home, that
doesn't prove there was a massive Sandy Hook global conspiracy, with Russia Today,
The
Guardian, Die Welt, etc., all in on it and having to be bribed from a conspiracy
that makes a loss and just about guarantees the perps will go to jail.
The fact that the Sunstein team had to get Halbig to broadcast his opinions -
and thereby advance him to 9/10 on the stupidity scale -
in order to prop up their
flagging conspiracy theory, after Michael Collins Piper's False Flags exposed their
deceptions, shows how desperate they have become.
A public schools security expert would be an ideal person for Sunstein to
recruit for acting the role of a dumb "conspiraloon" who could concoct some
imagined reasons for supposing the Sandy Hook events didn't "fit", and whose
childish crippled
epistemology and inability to think through the ramifications of his conclusion,
would lead him to imagine that more than two dozen deaths were faked at Sandy Hook.
In short, the Sunstein brigade's Operation Halbig smacks of desperation, and
shows that they are losing their battle to oppose truth-seekers by cognitive
infiltration.Update: It turns out that Wolfgang Halbig is not only Jewish, but was already an
activist working to advance Jewish political interests as early as September
2012, months before Sandy Hook. He hates Obama, and was angry that someone did
not kill Hitler, which he claims would have saved 6 million of "our" people.
In his Feb 19, 2014 broadcast at BlogTalkRadio, Halbig says [17:57] his father
was in a "Nazi prison camp" for four years in Poland.
This is corroborated by a post
by Halbig of "a year ago", with the URL indicating
September 2012, in which Halbig claims Obama "hates the Jews".

wolfgang halbig
• a year ago

OBAM HATES THE JEWS AND DOES NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT JERUSALEM IS THE CAPITAL.
HIS DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM REMOVED GOD FROM OUR FOUNDATION AS AMERICANS
Today I am as angry as anyone can get. What is it going to take for the
uneducated Americans to get educated and start thinking about how they have
responsibilities and not just rights that they throw in our faces everyday.
My father for four years I learned was in a NAZI PRISON in POSEN, POLAND.
Thank God that the Americans found him.
The letters I have now found in GERMANY makes me sick to my stomach as to what
Hitler did to the Jewish Race. To this day I cannot believe that someone did not
kill him which would have saved 6 million of our people there not just a jewish
race they are people just like you and me."

So that was from around September 2012. Then, three months later, the Sandy Hook
mass killings occur, and Jewish political activists such as Halbig realise that
they can exploit the event for a propaganda advantage.
Thus, Halbig is not simply some ordinary person who happened to work in school
safety and thought there was something amiss about Sandy Hook. He is a Jewish
political activist, working to advance Jewish public relations - the very sort
of person needed for Sunstein's team of shills who trash truth-tellers by
promoting loony conspiracy theories.
On October 10, 2012, Wolfgang W. Halbig posted, and copied and
pasted multiple times, that he'd been "gathering
information about and evidence against Barack Hussein Obama, I have encountered
hundreds of coincidences that strike me as amazing. None of those coincidences,
by themselves, may mean much. But taken as a whole it is almost impossible to
believe they were all the result of chance." And then proceeds with a massive,
lengthy series of events, such as how "In late 1999 Obama purportedly engaged in
homosexual activities and cocaine-snorting in the back of a limousine with a man
named Larry Sinclair...".
One purpose of posting this would have been so that Cass Sunstein and his
minions could observe how people would react to the insertion of various
conspiracy theories, and who, if any, would pass it on. As they clearly did with
the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories.
And in October 2012, Wolfgang Halbig was posing as a nutty conspiracy
theorist, and provoking some interesting reactions. An excerpt included:

Wolfgang HalbigAround 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California . He is very
open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was
wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself
to his studies.
[...]
Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett was Michele Obama's
boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions
without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz,
Iran! Am I going nuts or is there a pattern here?Source

Sunstein and his pals would have been interest to find out whether people did
in fact consider Halbig's 'theory' to be "nuts", or if folk would perceive some
sort of "pattern" in his claims. The replies indicated a unanimous verdict:
Halbig was considered to be nuts. "The paranoia and racism run deep in this one", "Sir you
sound like a conspiracy theorist!! You have too much time on your hands.",
"Wow....real KKK marerial. [sic] Reminds me of the John Birchers back in the 60's.
True Tea Party material."
Halbig likes posting about the "uneducated" social class, and also posts
about "the blacks" and "Mexicans". For example:

[...] How can so many people be that stupid and not see the big picture.
I picked fruit at age 12 all through High School to help my mother and I
liked it because I got paid for my work.
The Mexicans are taking the blacks jobs because the blacks see those jobs as
demeaning to their status in America. [..]

On March 23, 2012, Halbig was trolling, telling someone: "Your an
idiot..........get a life.. How wrong can anyone be. You need mental health
counseling if that is how you feel".
A couple of people responded: "Wolfgang W Halbig A. He's wrong only on his last(and maybe his first) point(s.) But how
about pointing out how he is wrong instead of just throwing insults like a 9year
old!? Aren't you too old to be behaving this way? Losing your marbles???" And:
"Wolfgang W Halbig You're the idiot...this "racist cracker" not white people,
felt the need to "rid" the world of another (what he called) "coon" because he's
such coward that he goes after unarmed, young innocent black men".
On July 24, 2012, Halbig was attempting to solicit money from gullible folk, by exploiting a post about a
genuine donations campaign:

Please donate and investigate what we can do in
saving children from committing suicide. I need $100,000 thousand dollars [sic]
and probably pay it back once the company is up and running. wolfgang

More recently, he hopes to part Sandy Hookers from their money. On his
interview by Dave Gahary, Halbig says [21:36] "Well, I think the next thing I'm
gonna do is, right now I'm gonna try to raise a lot of money, some funds. I
think there are a lot of people out there who really, really believe in learning
the truth. You know, they call them conspiracy nuts; they call them all kind of
names... [...] But here's my point: What I'm trying to do is raise a lot of
money."
Indeed, Halbig hopes to make "a lot of money" from "a lot" of people
whom he also regards as "conspiracy nuts". You can be sure that anyone gullible enough to fall for the scam will have their
names and addresses passed on to Sunstein and agencies such as FEMA, Homeland Security,
the ADL or the SPLC, thereby allowing Halbig to profit several times over
from each person. Unfortunately, by the time truth-seekers "learn the truth"
about Halbig and his scam, he'll have scarpered with their money, and their
personal details will have been harvested.
Halbig doesn't doubt in the slightest that twenty children were killed at
Sandy Hook. His supposed "research" and asking "questions" is nothing more than
a masquerade, a means to a business and political end.
So, Halbig is an internet troll who inserts various conspiracy
theories so that the Sunstein team can monitor the reaction. And his
post "OBAM HATES THE JEWS"
reveals what Halbig, hero of the Sandy Hookers, truly thinks about Sandy
Hookers
- they are simply "uneducated Americans", to whom he feeds his bait
about faked
deaths and faked shootings, in the hope that some of them will be
"uneducated"
enough to swallow it. In
which case, they will have served their purpose, allowing themselves to
swell
his bank balance and be cited
as examples of wacky conspiracy loons, with the result that those who
present
evidence of real conspiracies - such as the undeniable proof of Israel's
central
role in 9/11 - are also tarred with the same brush. In the meantime,
Sunstein
and Zionist leaders are high-fiving and grinning as they celebrate the
success of their
counter-intelligence program against truth-seekers, who would otherwise
present
a much more serious threat against the perpetrators of false-flag
terror.

Beware ‘Patriots’ Setting ‘Litmus Tests’ for ‘Truth’THE WAY I SEE IT
By Michael Collins Piper
The “Letters to the Editor” in the July 14 & 21 issue of AFP provided an interesting illustration of how much diversity of opinion there is, even within the readership of AFP itself.

And that diversity reflects — quite precisely — the wide-ranging points of view on a variety of matters of importance to those who follow what might be dubbed as “the truth movement.”

Right now, let it be said, this diversity of opinion is a good thing. In recent years a few troublemakers have tried to set litmus tests to determine “who’s a real patriot” and “who isn’t” by asserting, for example, that if you believe children were actually killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012 you may be a government agent or that you have been bought off, blackmailed or bullied by government agents. Seriously. It’s gotten that bad.

Even those who believe Adam Lanza was a mind-controlled patsy and that children were killed have been accused of having fallen for a great big hoax.

In reality, they argue, no kids died and Lanza never existed in the first place. However, if truth be told, a lot of these troublemakers who’ve been setting up these phony litmus tests are probably government agents themselves, trying to stir up trouble between real patriots.
The pattern of their behavior (and some most unusual behind-the-scenes connections) suggests they are working on behalf of a carefully crafted scheme laid out by Cass Sunstein and other high-level crisis management planners to infiltrate and disrupt communication within the truth movement by planting false stories and ridiculous claims making serious research into 9-11, the JFK assassination and other very real conspiracies look silly.
Right now some good people are watching these “Sunsteiners” and hopefully, some day soon, they’ll be able to name the names of these infiltrators.

But, in the meantime, we need to open debate among patriots, just as we saw in last week’s AFP.

Dr. Adrian Krieg, one of the most respected voices in the truth movement, wrote in support of AFP’s article about the abuse to which “truthers” have subjected families of those who say they lost children at Sandy Hook.

Krieg recognizes — as AFP said from the beginning — that a lot of questions remain about this tragedy and that what Krieg described as “goofy conspiracy theories” don’t help resolve the matter.

Tom Stahl’s letter took issue with an AFP article “In Defense of the Death Penalty.”
Stahl made the point that “given some bad luck and some crooked cops and prosecutors, anyone . . . could wind up on death row.” While some hardliners say, “put the criminals to death and if a few innocent folks get lost in the shuffle, so be it,” there are a lot of AFP readers concerned about the growing police state and untrammeled misbehavior by law enforcement at all levels. So, in my opinion, Mr. Stahl has a very good point, though you may disagree with him.
And there was the thought-provoking letter from Ann Peters who took issue with a story citing criticisms of Barack Obama that, in her view, sounded like neoconservative propaganda out of Fox News and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, a front man for the Rothschild dynasty.

As AFP has warned, many patriots who don’t like Obama have been sucked in by the pro-war and pro-imperialist line out of Fox News, cleverly wrapped in flag-waving rhetoric critical of Obama.
Fox and its GOP allies, including some tea party folks, even attacked Obama for removing a bust of Zionist-controlled warmonger Winston Churchill from the White House, suggesting this was somehow “anti-American.”

Irrational hatred of Obama — who has by no means been an exemplary president — might lead patriots down some paths into traps laid by Fox News and that’s the implicit point made.
Good patriots will continue to disagree on many issues, ranging from taxes to what constitutes “real” money and what doesn’t to matters such as the legalization of marijuana.

Patriots will argue over religion and over social issues, too. Some patriots still believe the media’s claim that Adolf Hitler killed 6 million Jews; others say that’s nonsense.
The areas of disagreement (real and potential) are endless.
But setting litmus tests for what is the “right” thing to believe and trying to enforce political correctness within the truth movement is a big mistake.

_This
is guaranteed: You are about to be confronted with some harsh realities
that may be unlike you’ve ever encountered in whatever you’ve heard
about what happened at Sandy Hook school on Dec. 14 2012 and at the
Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.
_If you will be personally
offended by expressions of fact and opinion (based on fact) that may
contradict your deepest-felt beliefs regarding Sandy Hook and Boston,
then please read no further.
_We’ll say it right now—and this
will certainly astound you: Forget everything—everything—you’ve heard in
both the mainstream media and in the “alternative” media about Sandy
Hook and Boston.
_Then, after you’ve studied—if you dare—the
material we are about to explore, you’ll realize what really happened at
Sandy Hook and Boston is something unlike anything—and so very much
bigger— than even you might have imagined.
_You’ll never look at
Sandy Hook and Boston in the same way again. But you will be prepared
for whatever future “crisis” the high-level conspirators undoubtedly
have planned for America.
_As such, when that crisis happens,
you’ll be better able to see through the fog of disinformation that will
be once again unleashed— and rest assured that it will be.
In
the wake of Sandy Hook and Boston, much was heard in the
“alternative”media about “Crisis Actors” who played a part in
misdirecting people’s attention as to the real facts about what happened
during those “false flag” events.
_And false flag events they
were. Both of those tragedies were classic false flag operations, but
the truth is that they were not precisely the kind of false flag of the
type that we saw carried out in the JFK assassination, in the Oklahoma
City bombing, and later in 9-11.
_In fact, as we’ll see here—and this is the first time ever the story has been told in its entirety—the real “Crisis Actors” were not those whom many people believed them to be.
_And that is a story in and of itself.
_And it will surprise you.
_The
story is much bigger than anyone might have conceived and it points
toward the venal nature of a carefully-crafted high-level conspiracy
that bears all the ear-marks of the manipulative masters of mind control
whose not-so-fine (and ugly) hand was so clearly on the levels of power
in the murder of JFK and those mass murders that followed in Oklahoma
City and with the 9-11 terrorist tragedy.
_The vast flow of
dissident information that erupted following the events of 9-11 made it
an absolute“must” for the Mossad and its allies in intrigue to prevent
it from ever happening again.
_You see, this is old-fashioned
“crisis management” at its best (or worst).But the“crisis” in
question—as you might naturally think—is not the death of the president
or the lives lost in Oklahoma City or on 9-11.
_Rather, the
crisis—in the minds of the conspirators responsible—is the potential
danger to their power that could erupt if enough people came, for
example, to conclude that the Mossad was indeed responsible for any of
these false flag terrorist attacks on American soil.
_Therefore—in
the wake of 9-11 and the Internet frenzy that took place with the rise
of fast-moving and widely-distributed conspiracy theories (many
implicating the Mossad)—it is now clear a conscious decision was made to
ensure that, in the future, when any event of a conspiratorial nature
occurred (particularly one involving the Mossad) that those most
inclined toward acceptance of conspiracy theories would be corralled and
misdirected through the most effective means possible.
_However,
to achieve this end, it would be necessary to determine the best way to
chart the rise and course of conspiracy theories; to pinpoint precisely
who is most susceptible toward believing in them and, naturally, to do
all that could be done to discredit them.
_But the plan—as we
shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly
denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was
far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it
was a stroke of genius).
_The intriguers effectively determined
that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes). That
is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution
would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to
the mix.
_The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would
look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public
might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility.
_In
the past, people did have doubts about the official stories relating to
the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9-11 tragedy.
Now, however, emerging alternative theories about other events would be
totally eviscerated—from within—and die by their own accord.Anyone
putting forth any form of conspiracy theory would automatically become
suspect, their very sanity questioned.
_The multiple stream of
Internet provocations that captured the imagination of the “patriot”
and“alternative” media following the Sandy Hook affair and the events in
Boston were—beyond any question—the work of high-level conspirators
whose designs were clear:
_1) To monitor the reaction of known (and potential) political dissidents to public events of a “crisis” nature;
_2) To gauge the level of conspiracy theorizing (and the acceptance of the theories) following such events;
_3)
To trace the origins of conspiracy theories and to chart their course
via Internet websites, email and other social media venues;
_4) To disrupt and misdirect conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theories whose views were deemed in some way problematic;
_and
5) To have in place a fully-functioning Crisis Management System—a very
real “conspiracy”—that could be utilized to its fullest capacity at
some future time.
_The first public hint of what was
openly-acknowledged high-level intrigue of this sort—designed to
undermine the 9-11 truth movement (not to mention any and all
suggestions of conspiracies in other realms) was formally unveiled on
January 15, 2008.
_At that time, one Cass Sunstein, a professor at
the University of Chicago, and his co-author, Harvard law professor
Adrian Vermeule, put forth a so-called “preliminary draft” of what was
officially issued as “Harvard Public LawWorking Paper No.08-03 and
University of Chicago Public LawWorking Paper No. 199.”
_Although
little-noticed at the time it was first issued, the “working paper” came
under broad-ranging public inspection (widely discussed on the
Internet) after Sunstein was drafted in 2009 by President Barack Obama
to serve as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, a post Sunstein departed in 2012.
_Later published under
other auspices under the title “Conspiracy Theories,” the paper
addressed the specific question of how the government should respond to
conspiracy theories that were now holding wide sway (particularly on the
Internet) and, in no uncertain terms, addressed what Sunstein (who is
Jewish) considered the specific danger of the growing belief that Israel
had played a part in 9-11.
_Naturally, 9-11 truthers were outraged
by this paper and noted (rightly so) that the co-author was now
effectively “minister of information” for the Obama regime: A U.S.
government official was actually pondering, in writing,how government
power could be used to deal with conspiracy theories and those who
believed in them!
_Sunstein’s insidious and Orwellian “think piece” began by raising this question:

_Should
governmental responses be addressed to the suppliers [of conspiracy
theories] with a view to persuading or silencing them, or rather be
addressed to the mass audience, with a view to innoculating them from
pernicious theories?

_While noting that, in his
view,“these two strategies are not mutually exclusive,” Sunstein went on
to suggest that “perhaps the best approach is to straddle the two
audiences with a single response or simply to provide multiple
responses.”
_However, Sunstein said,many officials considered it “an
exercise in futility” to try to respond directly to “the suppliers of
conspiracy theories” and that, instead, they tried to “address their
responses to the third-party mass audience, hoping to stem the spread of
conspiracy theories by dampening the demand rather than by reducing the
supply.”
_In answer to his own question“What can the government do about conspiracy theories?” Sunstein provided five possibilities:

_(1) Government might ban “conspiracy theories,” somehow defined.
_(2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
_(3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.
_(4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech.
_(5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help.

_Noting
that each of these proposals had “a distinct set of potential effects,
or costs and benefits, and each [of which] will have a place under
imaginable conditions,” Sunstein answered the specific question of “What
should government do?” by stating quite directly:

_Our
main policy claim here is that government should engage in cognitive
infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which
involves a mix of [the aforementioned proposals:] (3), (4), and (5).

_Clearly,
Sunstein recognized that—at least under the First Amendment as it
exists today—the government could not ban conspiracy theories outright
or levy some sort of tax on those who purvey such theories that he and
others find offensive.
_However, Sunstein concluded, the
government could engage in efforts to counter the theories by
recruiting“credible private parties” to combat conspiracy theoriests and
by engaging in “information communication with such parties,
encouraging them to help.”
_And this framework, in itself, is
already in place. It is a very dirty and ugly history indeed,
demonstrated by the long-standing collaboration between such groups as
the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center (not to
mention the American Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Committee)
working with the CIA and the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, as
well as Israel’s Mossad—and, dare we add, British intelligence—in
concerted efforts to undermine American political dissidents.
_Working
from this standpoint Sunstein outlined what he called “a distinctive
tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy
theories.” This program, he said, involved the following:

_[C]ognitive
infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their
allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or
anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by
planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate
within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.

_Because,
Sunstein said,“conspiracy theorists are likely to approach evidence and
arguments in a biased way, they are not likely to respond well, or even
logically, to the claims of [people they know to be] public officials,”
it was vital that, as Sunstein said,“government officials would
participate anonymously or even with false identities” in 9-11
discussion groups and other conspiracy-focused gatherings on the
Internet and elsewhere.
_And with the increasingly widespread
knowledge we now have about the capacity of the National Security
Agency—among many government intelligence agencies in the United States
alone—to monitor the telephone calls, emails, and other Internet
activity of all Americans,we can certainly say, with utmost authority,
that Sunstein and his co-conspirators and like-minded intriguers had
already concluded that the framework was in place to be able to see
precisely who was engaged in conspiracy talk and with whom they were
communicating.
_It is thus no coincidence that when the series of
scandals erupted over the summer of 2013 regarding the activities of
the National Security Agency (NSA) that Cass Sunstein was one of the
four members of the so-called “independent” panel appointed by President
Barack Obama charged with the responsibility of “reviewing” the
operations of the NSA and other government agencies.
_And nor,we
might add, it is any coincidence that another member of the panel,
Richard Clarke (a former high ranking advisor to presidents—Democratic
and Republican alike—in the realm of“national security”) now happens to
head a private firm known as Good Harbor Security Risk Management.
_And yes, as you might have guessed, Good Harbor touts “Crisis Management” as one of its specialities.
_Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.
_The
concept of “Crisis Management” is the new “big thing” in our modern
era.And don’t forget—as we mentioned in Chapter Eighteen— that former
high-ranking FBI official Neil Herman who was involved in much of the
intrigues surrounding 9-11 (and who later worked as director of
“fact-finding” for Israel’s American intelligence arm, the Anti-
Defamation League) went on to become part of the “crisis management
team” at Burson-Marstellar, one of the premier firms in that field
today.
_In fact, two popular television dramas of recent date
have Crisis Management specialists at the core of their
storyline—“Scandal,” portraying the day-to-day workings of a beautiful
African-American Crisis Management operative in Washington, D.C. and
“The Good Wife,” featuring a particularly wily Crisis Management
specialist (portrayed as a distinctly Jewish figure with the name of“Eli
Gold”) who carries on his intrigues in Cass Sunstein’s home base of
Chicago, no less.
_Both programs are quite revealing and say much about the nature of Crisis Management methods of operation.
_Several
episodes of “The Good Wife” noted the use of “cyber shills” whose duty
it is to infiltrate the Internet and place false stories and
provocations designed to promote some particular agenda—or disrupt
someone else’s.
_A simple Internet search of the term “Crisis
Management”—and the term does deserve to be capitalized as we have
rendered it here— demonstrates how foremost these new techniques of
“public relations” (that is, propaganda) really are in the minds of
those in high places.
_As we said: “Crisis Management—that’s what it’s all about.”
_So
it was that—with the nature of Internet communication as it exists
today and with the capacity to be able to monitor any and all content
circulating on the Internet—Cass Sunstein and company had the means to
construct and carry out a rather simple (but 21st Century-style
technologically-sophisticated) exercise in Crisis Management planning
which incorporated rather skillful experimentation with that new
technology in implementing good old-fashioned Crowd Control.
And
when we talk about Crowd Control,we’re not talking about the use of
fire hoses and police dogs and stun guns. Rather, in fact, what we’re
talking about is really just a highly-advanced form of “Mind
Control”—one designed to influence a large number of people over an
extended period of time through covert and quite insidious manipulation
of the media—and that does include the Internet and the “alternative”
and “independent” media as well. Unfortunately, a brief digression into
the topic of Mind Control is relevant and important here, for it relates
directly to the nature of the manipulative experiments in False Flag
Crowd Control that were central to the Internet frenzy following both
Sandy Hook and Boston.
_Long part of the intrigues of the
high-level conspirators—best exemplified in the CIA’s infamous MK-ULTRA
experiments in Mind Control, the initial stages of which were launched
in the days following the CIA’s founding in 1947—this realm has not only
been a province of the CIA, but also that of the Soviet KGB and
Israel’s Mossad and other intelligence agencies (both public and
private)—as well.
_Now, unfortunately, although the concept of
Mind Control is best known among truth-seekers as a consequence of the
widespread distribution of such works as Cathy O’Brien’s rather dubious
book Trance-Formation of America, the truth is that there has
always been available a wide variety of responsible material on the
subject, in particular the book by former State Department foreign
service officer John D. Marks entitled The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.
_Subtitled
“The CIA and Mind Control: The Story of the Agency’s Secret Efforts to
Control Human Behavior,” Marks’ book was based on some 16,000 pages of
documents that Marks pried out of the CIA through the Freedom of
Information Act following the public revelations regarding CIA
adventures in this bizarre field that were unveiled in the wake of a
controversial series of Senate hearings conducted by Sen. Frank Church
(D-Idaho) into the activities of the CIA. Until then, Americans believed
that only “the Communists” and “the Nazis” had engaged in unpleasant
experiments to manipulate human behavior.
_(The title of
Marks’non-fiction book was inspired by the 1958 novel by Richard
Condon—later a popular motion picture—entitled The Manchurian Candidate.
In that horrifying story, an American soldier is brainwashed by the
communists during the KoreanWar, falsely set up as a “war hero” to be
revered by the American public, and later manipulated in an
assassination plot upon his return to the United States.
_(It
turns out that the hero’s own mother is actually a secret communist
agent—despite the fact that she is one of the best known
“anticommunists” in America—and is using her son as part of a communist
plot to seize control of the United States in the guise of fighting
communism.
_The mind-control victim never knows he is being
manipulated— until it is too late.) So—all of that having been said—Mind
Control is very real and can be carried out in a variety of ways.And
Crowd Control—which is a part of Crisis Management—is a form of Mind
Control. And you may rest assured that those who have in interest in
these matters have studied these concepts carefully and know precisely
how they work.
_And—as we have seen—with high-level forces having
witnessed the growth of “conspiracy theories”which these would be
masters of the universe realize endanger their power—particularly with
the rise of the Internet as a somewhat “independent”means of
communication— the need to combat those conspiracy theories (and to
control the Internet) has become a major concern.
_These very
real conspirators—people of the likes of the aforementioned Cass
Sunstein,who actually laid out a plan for undermining conspiracy
theories—determined the best way to facilitate their operation was to
orchestrate (or take advantage of) an event that would grip the public
imagination and then manipulate it for their own purposes.
_Their
goal was to have in place a carefully-structured network that, in the
future,could be used in a much-bigger fashion to direct or—as the case
may be—to misdirect public opinion (particularly in the realm of those
open to “conspiracy theories”) and ensure that the trade of information
regarding such events was carefully controlled.
_Here,
essentially,was the plan: These conspirators needed a “crisis”—a
reasonably small and manageable event they could monitor and manipulate
from the very beginning, finding out, essentially,“who’s in touch with
whom” and by what means and venues conspiracy theories (relating to such
a crisis) gained their most widespread circulation.
_Whether the
crisis was “real”—that is, of its own making, one that happened on its
own—or whether it was manufactured (through covert means by some
clandestine agency) didn’t matter.
_What mattered was the
capacity to track (and, more importantly, to direct) public reaction to
the crisis (particularly in the realm of “conspiracy theories”) and to
manage the crisis to such a degree that any and all conspiracy theories
relating to that crisis could be made to look foolish.
_And
here’s the critical point to remember: These conspirators also realized
that they could effectively redirect public debate not just by
countering conspiracy theories but by actively inserting their own
downright silly and ridiculous disinformation into the debate with the
aim of discrediting any and all conspiracy theories.
_Worthy
of the greatest thinkers of theTalmud, it was right out of the
legendary Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And it was
programmed—from the start—to capture the imagination of (and control)
the minds of sincere patriots who were already inclined (quite
naturally) to buy into conspiracy theories!
_Fully versed in the
legendary sociological study of crowd behavior laid down in 1895 by
Gustave Lebon in The Crowd—a volume described as having “exerted a
powerful influence upon the thought of men aiming to understand the
workings of collective behavior and of social psychology”—Sunstein and
company set in motion a scheme that can only be described as brilliant,
if not just simply as evil.
_To those who understand Sunstein’s
proposition on the deeper level of Mind Control that it represents and
who have likewise taken the time to carefully study the bigger picture
in retrospect, it is all too apparent that the Internet-based frenzy
following the Sandy Hook affair was clearly the work of the Sunstein
crowd—we’ll call them the Crisis Management Conspirators—who remembered
all too well what Gustave LeBon had said when he wrote so succinctly:“To
know the art of impressing the imagination of crowds is to know at the
same time the art of governing them.”
_The Sandy Hook affair was
tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It
involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control,
inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it
was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no
less.
_The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
_And,
quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically
reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the
heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and
presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
_And
naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion
among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who
were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was
accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook.
_Now
some of the errors were eventually corrected,but many of the errors
were simply ignored or otherwise lost in the shuffle, and this led to
further suspicions on the part of those who sensed that there was more
to Sandy Hook than was officially being reported.
_(Unfortunately,
although some of the errors were indeed later corrected,many so-called
“conspiracy theorists” never became aware of those corrections and
continued—even to this day—to cite those
“errors” as evidence of a cover-up.
_(And
that’s another reason conspiracy theorists must be detail-oriented, for
if they can be disproven in one minor area, those who are eager to
dismiss their theories will use that one mistake as “evidence” that the
bigger picture—the more broad-ranging so-called “conspiracy theory”—is,
in and of itself, totally wrong.)
_But note this:
_Considering
the fact Sunstein and his like-minded conspirators do have high-level
connections to the controllers of the big media, it’s likely some media
elements deliberately purveyed incomplete or imprecise stories about
Sandy Hook, knowing full well that alert readers and audiences would
detect these errors and that they would be bandied about as “proof” of a
conspiracy, further muddying the waters.And that, in fact, is what
happened in many instances.
_However, as we shall see, there is
strong evidence to suggest that at least some “inside” elements in the
mass media did play a key role in “leaking” material that was used by
the Sunstein group to distract truth seekers in the wake of Sandy Hook.
More about that later.
_But aside from the mis-reporting in the
major media (whether deliberate or otherwise) it was almost exclusively
on the Internet—via the so-called “truther” and “alternative” and
“independent” websites, discussion groups, along with email and the
popular video forum, YouTube, etc—that a wide variety of absolutely
baseless (and largely nonsensical) stories about Sandy Hook began to
appear.
_This was clearly the work of a small but skilled team of operatives working for Sunstein and company.
_As
Sunstein had suggested in his now-infamous working paper, their purpose
was to manipulate—and ultimately refute—and make fools of—sincere truth
seekers and so-called “conspiracy theorists.”
_And, even more
so, Sunstein’s goal was to convince the broad range of the American
public that anyone who spoke about any conspiracies at high levels was
just simply not someone to be believed.
_One of the first and
most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make
sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oftrepeated theme that“Sandy
Hook was a hoax”and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that
was a frequently repeated allegation.)
_Even the introduction of
the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media
reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe
the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a
lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what
happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited.
_And—just
as Sunstein and company expected (and desired)—other individuals
discussing other matters involving conspiracies (the 9-11 cover-up, the
Oklahoma bombing, the JFK assassination, and even the Israeli attack on
the U.S.S. Liberty) were themselves being subjected to sarcastic
comments such as,“I suppose you’re also one of those people who doesn’t
believe those 20 little children were killed at Sandy Hook.”
_Sunstein and company had scored big.
_They
knew they literally had a proverbial “captive audience” that was
unwittingly receptive to their manipulations. And they had the capacity
to track—via the Internet—the entirety of the exchange of information
going on.
_This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams.
_Sunstein
and the Crisis Management Conspirators implementing his plan recognized
that the diverse assortment of groups active in political dissent
—whether they call themselves “patriots” or “nationalists” or “truth
seekers” or “white separatists” (the list of such largely selfimposed
labels could go on and on)—constituted the definition of a “crowd” as
laid forth in the aforementioned Gustave LeBon’s rather sinister
analysis of the manner in which a “crowd” can be manipulated.

_In
its ordinary sense the word "crowd" means a gathering of individuals of
whatever nationality, profession, or sex, and whatever be the chances
that have brought them together.
_From the psychological point of view, the expression "crowd" assumes quite a different signification. . . .
_The
sentiments and ideas of all the persons in the gathering take one and
the same direction, and their conscious personality vanishes. A
collective mind is formed, doubtless transitory, but presenting very
clearly defined characteristics.
_The gathering has thus become .
. . an organized crowd, or, if the term is considered preferable, a
psychological crowd. It forms a single being, and is subjected to the
law of the mental unity of crowds.

_In other words,
these proverbial “mad scientists”—these modernday Crisis Management
Conspirators, steeped in the teachings of LeBon—saw that conspiracy
theories tended to form (and initially circulate) within a“crowd”of
like-minded individuals and that, from that standpoint alone, such a
crowd was easily manipulated. It was, after all, the High Priest of
Crowd Control, Le Bon himself,who pointed out that:

_However
indifferent it may be supposed, a crowd, as a rule, is in a state of
expectant attention, which renders suggestion easy. The first suggestion
formulated which arises implants itself immediately by a process of
contagion in the brains of all assembled, and the identical bent of the
sentiments of the crowd is immediately an accomplished fact.

_That
is, once a particular “theory”—some particular thought, some particular
“factoid” (as they now call it)—has been inserted into a likeminded
crowd, that factoid (even if, per chance, it doesn’t happen to be true)
almost becomes an article of faith or even, as Le Bon said, “immediately
an accomplished fact.”
_As such, the Le Bonian Mind Control
masterminds recognized that precisely because a “crowd” tends, thus, to
think alike, and accept all precepts that “sound good” or which seem
parallel to their particular mindset, that a “crowd” would immediately
incorporate by “process of contagion” any idea inserted into the mass
thinking of the crowd.
_The Crisis Management Conspirators knew
that once a “crowd” had become conditioned to “think alike” (so to
speak) and was thereby easily subject to the power of suggestion, that
such a like-minded group would immediately start to develop its own
particular mindset a way of looking at some issue or event.
_As Le Bon pointed out:

_The simplest event that comes under the observation of a crowd is soon totally transformed.
_A
crowd thinks in images, and the image itself immediately calls up a
series of other images, having no logical connection with the first. We
can easily conceive this state by thinking of the fantastic succession
of ideas to which we are sometimes led by calling up in our minds any
fact.
_Our reason shows us the incoherence there is in these
images, but a crowd is almost blind to this truth, and confuses with the
real event what the deforming action of its imagination has
superimposed thereon.
_A crowd scarcely distinguishes between the
subjective and the objective. It accepts as real the images evoked in
its mind,though they most often have only a very distant relation with
the observed fact.

_Essentially, because so many
people in “The Crowd”—that is, the “truth movement”—saw (quite clearly)
that the mass media was attempting to stoke up demands for increased gun
control measures (even outright gun confiscation on a national scale),
the whole image of Sandy Hook changed in its entirety.
_In fact, this was the REAL “false flag” in the whole Sandy Hook debate, but many good patriots didn’t see what was happening.
_Rather
than focusing on the genuine issue of specific concern—the push for gun
control—“The Crowd” was instead gettting bogged down and looking in the
wrong direction, worrying about a variety of unimportant details and
making allegations about Sandy Hook—that no children had actually died,
for example—that made honest critics of gun control look foolish, if not
downright venal.
_Most people among the general public more or
less accepted the idea that a disturbed young man had committed a
horrible deed and that—predictably—gun control advocates once again
jumped on the tragedy in order to pursue their anti-gun agenda.
_A
lot of people—including a lot of people in the “truth movement”—had
previously (and rightly) expressed concerns that many of the people
involved in previous mass shootings had been under the influence of
psychiatric drugs which have been pushed by the major media to the great
profit of the pharmeceutical conglomerates.
_And at the outset,
even most skeptics of the official version of events had no doubt buying
the possibility that the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza,had been the
victim of MK-ULTRA style mind control,brainwashed into committing a mass
shooting in order to help stampede public support for gun control or
outright gun confiscation.
_Over the years more than a few
independent journalists had compiled an assembly of data on a number of
mass shootings in the U.S. and elsewhere suggesting there was much more
to the story behind these shootings; that, in fact, they were
orchestrated by behind-the-scenes forces and that there was evidence of
“mind control” involved.
_So there were a lot of good reasons for
many to at least suspect that perhaps there was some sort of Mind
Control or other form of high-level intrigue involved in the Sandy Hook
shooting.
_In fact—up until Sandy Hook—this explanation (that
Lanza was a mind-controlled false flag patsy who actually killed little
chiildren) would have sufficed for even the most hard-core skeptic who
doubted the official version of events laid down by the authorities.
_But
with Sandy Hook—and the intervention of the Crisis Management
Conspirators—the outlook of the“average”grass-roots conspiracy theorist
in “The Crowd” would never be the same again.
_As a consequence
of the intrigues of the Crisis Management Conspirators, the mindset of
the conspiracy theorists would be drastically altered to the point that
many good people were pushed into the direction of believing that
absolutely nothing—absolutely nothing— could ever be believed and that
everything—absolutely everything— was a horrendous lie.
_And we
are not talking just about Sandy Hook.We are talking about virtually
anything—everything—taking place in our world today.
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators were pushing honest truth seekers in“The Crowd”
into a proverbial padded cell where they could just keep screaming at
the top of their voices and banging their heads against the wall with
the ultimate realization that nobody was paying any attention to them
whatsoever—a virtual Twilight Zone.
_Nonetheless—on a parallel
basis—the Crisis Management Conspirators,quite naturally,didn’t want
anyone in the general public, at least, to ever consider the possibility
that there had been any Mind Manipulation or any conspiracy to stage
a“crisis”—such as another mass shooting—to justify gun confiscation.
_Therefore,
they began spinning bizarre tales and inserting them onto the Internet
and into the mind of “The Crowd”—that is, patriots and other skeptics of
the official story—in order to muddy up serious inquiry and
discussion.
_They dazzled “The Crowd”with an array of colorful
and interesting and fiendishly clever (if not obviously outrageous)
rumors that absolutely had the immediate and profound (and very much
intended) effect of directing public ire upon those good patriots—the
so-called “conspiracy theorists”—who were rightly concerned about
behind-thescenes manipulation that accompanied the events at Sandy
Hook.
_Soon enough—and not surprisingly—people in the general
public began to think any conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook were
absolutely beyond the pale and that people inclined toward conspiracy
theories questioning the official government line were crazy
troublemakers who belonged in mental hospitals!
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and
other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that
quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites
by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting
them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the
staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute
the latest Sandy Hook “revelations.”
_And, of course, this—as we
shall see in a moment—was all keeping in line with another aspect of the
“crowd” that the “guru” of the Crisis Management Conspirators—Gustave
LeBon—had already assessed.
People were falling victim to the the
fact that because something is repeated time and again, it gains a
certain credibility in the mind of the ‘crowd.” LeBon wrote:

_The
influence of repetition on crowds is comprehensible when the power is
seen which it exercises on the most enlightened minds.
_This
power is due to the fact that the repeated statement is embedded in the
long run in those profound regions of our unconscious selves in which
the motives of our actions are forged.
_At the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.
_When
an affirmation has been sufficiently repeated and there is unanimity in
this repetition . . .what is called a current of opinion is formed and
the powerful mechanism of contagion intervenes.

_Precisely
because so much disinformation was being repeated by well-meaning and
entirely innocent folks, a lot of good patriots concluded that something
had to be amiss with the “official” Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they
said—so many good patriots on so many websites and elsewhere wouldn’t be
raising these questions. However—and this is a point that many failed
to consider at the time (but which many patriots are now coming to
realize):
_The truth is that a vast majority of the Sandy Hook
spin came from theretofore unknown sources—who to this day still remain
largely unknown,other than through Internet nicknames—who helped put out
much of the material in the first place, adding often-dubious
commentary that helped stir up suspicion in the first place.
_As
LeBon had so rightly said, “at the end of a certain time we have
forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by
believing it.” How true it was with Sandy Hook!
_These Internet
sources who had suddenly popped up had no reputation (either good or
bad) among traditional patriots and conspiracy theorists—but their
impact was immeasurable.
_And they were ably aided and abetted by
some longtime deep-cover assets—agents provocateurs—inside the patriot
movement who helped give further “credibility” to these stories being
cranked out by the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_A lot of old
CIA hands and federal informants---veterans of the black propaganda
journal Media Bypass (referenced in Chapter Fourteen) that had been
heavily funded and set up in time for the disinformation surrounding the
Oklahoma City bombing----popped up to help disseminate a lot of the
Sandy Hook-related nonsense that gripped the imagination of the
patriots.
_Meanwhile, on a daily basis, the powers-that-be in
control of the mass media were cranking up a continuing round-the-clock
campaign in favor of gun control,pointing at Sandy Hook as underscoring
the necessity for dismantling the Second Amendment. It was, they said,
“for the children.” Americans were told they needed to give up their
guns so as to prevent future tragedies of this kind.
_But the
irony is that many good people who thought that by“exposing the Sandy
Hook fraud”—that is, passing on the Internet-based rumors about Sandy
Hook—that they were “doing something” to stop the drive for gun control.
In fact, it was a total misdirection from the central issue of gun
control. Peoples’energies were being focused not on gun control but on
the “necessity” to “spread the truth about Sandy Hook.”
_And
that, as we’ve said,was the real“false flag” in Sandy Hook.
However,unfortunately, the patriots who were repeating the Internet
rumors were giving a whole new twist to the controversy surrounding
Sandy Hook and the push for gun control that came in its wake.
_What
was happening was that the more the conspiracy theories surrounding
Sandy Hook got all the more fantastic, the more it had the effect of
discrediting all sincere critics of gun control who were being
identified with “those people who say that no children really died at
Sandy Hook.” The bottom line matter of fighting the drive for gun
control was sidelined by “The Crowd” which had become caught up in
discussing (and perpetuating) all of the silly Sandy Hook rumors that
the Crisis Management Conspirators had unleashed on the Internet.
_The
Crisis Management Conspirators—having a field day (and a good laugh) at
their success in re-shaping the thinking of conspiracyconscious
patriots—knew full well of another key concept put forth by LeBon: The
fact that a “crowd” can accept the most ridiculous propositions, ones
that an individual—prior to becoming a member of the “crowd”—would not
be so ready to incorporate into his thinking. if given the time to
consider the matter more fully.
_More and more a fabulously
colorful bazaar of bizarre conspiracy theories began to swirl around
Sandy Hook. Many of these theories— often promulgated as part of a
grab-bag package by their promoters— were directly contradictory.
_Here’s an example.
_One
big name figured out that Israel’s Mossad was behind the shooting. His
proof? Well, everybody knows that the Mossad is murderous and that
Israel has no problem killing children.
_This authority claims a
three-man Mossad team pulled off the job— but then again, there are
folks who say this investigator is dead wrong (pun intended) since, of
course, nobody was killed at Sandy Hook at all, or least not enough
people killed to justify a big-time Mossad operation of the kind
described by that analyst.
_However, as far as the Mossad is
concerned (vis-a-vis Sandy Hook) there were two different claims in this
regard. Some said the Mossad did it to hurt President Obama, getting
revenge against the president for not being pro-Israel enough. Others
said the Mossad did it to help the president further along the
conspiracy to grab America’s guns.
_In other words, if you think
the Mossad did it, you have two entirely different (and quite
contradictory) motives to choose from. And so, depending on what you
think of Barack Obama, you have two different versions of the story that
“The Mossad Was Behind Sandy Hook.”
_But the foundation of this
theory—which is certainly delectable to anyone who has professed belief
of Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City
bombing and in 9-11—doesn’t have any basis in any given facts, the
exciting scenario itself notwithstanding.
_Yet—believe it or
not—after I publicly discounted Mossad involvement in Sandy Hook (on the
basis that I had seen no actual proof—even circumstantial—of such
involvement) I was accused of “covering up for the Mossad” and of being
“a Zionist agent.” (Seriously.)
_In fact, there is no proof that Mossad assassins were involved in any shooting (real or staged) in Sandy Hook.
_How
the Mossad was involved in Sandy Hook was in a way most of the great
conspiracy theorists clearly were unable to figure out, so busy they
were with distributing the increasingly more silly and unlikely
conspiracy theories that were running wild on the Internet.
_The Mossad was hiding in plain sight and the patriot researchers and conspiracy theorists never saw it at all.
_It
was clearly allies (or outright assets) of the Mossad—figures in Cass
Sunstein’s Crisis Management gang—who were conjuring up and distributing
the ridiculous stories that gained such currency. In effect, the
patriots were passing on Mossad-sponsored black propaganda and they
never understood that at all!
_And, naturally, this had the
desired effect of making any and all conspiracy theorists—especially
anyone who might date mention the dread word “Mossad”— look
crazy,marginal and generally to be disbelieved.
_So, in that
sense, the Mossad was behind Sandy Hook but not in the way that many
Sandy Hook true believers might like to think.At the very least, the
Mossad profited from Sandy Hook by being able to monitor (and
manipulate) the conspiracy theories that emerged. It was a classic
experiment in Crisis Management and Mind Control and the patriot
dissidents never understood that at all.
_And that’s precisely
why the bad folks at the Mossad and their allies among the Crisis
Management Conspirators had a good laugh at the antics of the “patriots”
who were hawking the latest disinformation inserted onto the Internet
designed to make those patriots look foolish.
_But despite the
contradictions in this realm (and in other aspects of the stories
circulating about Sandy Hook) that didn’t seem to phase many who helped
spread the stories saying,“I’m just passing on what I’ve heard.” These
people actually believed that as a member of “The Crowd” they were doing
their patriotic duty, having no idea they were being manipulated by the
very forces they were seeking to combat!
_The Crisis Management
Conspirators had once again put the theoretical precepts of their High
Priest—LeBon—into practice by conjuring up (and putting into
distribution via the Internet) the most audaciously ridiculous
narratives.They knew full well that “The Crowd” would buy into these
stories without question.As LeBon wrote:

_The
figurative imagination of crowds is very powerful, very active and very
susceptible of being keenly impressed. The images evoked in their mind
by a personage, an event, an accident, are almost as lifelike as the
reality.
_Crowds are to some extent in the position of the
sleeper whose reason, suspended for the time being, allows the arousing
in his mind of images of extreme intensity which would quickly be
dissipated could they be submitted to the action of reflection.
_Crowds,
being incapable both of reflection and of reasoning, are devoid of the
notion of improbability; and it is to be noted that in a general way it
is the most improbable things that are the most striking.
_This is why it happens that it is always the marvellous and legendary side of events that more specially strike crowds.

_Clearly,
this phenomenon explains why so many otherwise sensible people began to
believe some of the most extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook set
loose on the Internet by theretofore unknown“sources” with no record of
recognition or credibility in any way, shape or form.
_Because so
much of this material was being so quickly and so widely distributed
and then being re-distributed by others eager for new information about
Sandy Hook, these improbable and ridiculous notions effectively became a
matter of fact. And, as LeBon said, the “marvellous”—that is, the most
striking, even outrageous—aspects of the Sandy Hook theories were what
took hold.
_Before long, it was being said that accused Sandy
Hook shooter Adam Lanza hadn’t even fired a single shot that
day.According to the story, he had never even been in the school that
day—not alive, at least. The story was that Lanza had been formally
declared dead by the Social Security administration one day before the
shooting—and that he died in New Hampshire (a state away). The real
conspirators behind Sandy Hook had not only killed Lanza the day
before,but—evidently following the law (!)—they had made certain to
register his death with the Social Security administration, law-abiding
folks that these conspirators were.
_When some “theorists”were
pressed on this point, they could only respond,“Oh, well, they wanted us
to discover that.This was their way of confounding us and showing us
they could do anything they wanted. They wanted us to see that there
really was much more to the story but they also wanted to display their
power to cover up the truth.”
_Hardly a day had gone by before it
was alleged that the police and fire departments were involved in the
conspiracy, deliberately blocking the exits to the school during the
shooting for the purpose of ensuring that the killers could rack up as
high a body count as possible.
_The county coroner’s public
persona rubbed people the wrong way. Somebody pronounced the judgment
that he wasn’t “acting right” for someone who had just performed
autopsies on a bunch of purportedly dead children and therefore he
definitely had to be in on the act. He was just “too weird.”
_Soon enough, that was the final word on the matter among dissidents. Somebody had said it, so therefore it had to be true.
_But
the real question is this: WHO first said it and why did THEIR judgment
effectively become the last word on the subject—“proof”of a much-bigger
conspiracy?_Nobody seemed to know precisely where so much of
the “dissident” opinions were coming from—but whatever was said was
freely passed on as though it constituted solid proof of “something.”
_Because
the police initially prevented families from viewing the bullet- ripped
corpses of the children, word spread that the families never once saw
their dead children at all, despite the fact there were open casket
funerals for a number of the children the conspiracy theorists said had
never really died.
_Wax figures in the coffins,maybe? Designed to
fool the parents who believed that their children had been killed? (Or
were the parents, as some said, in on the conspiracy?)
_“If they
reported that the families couldn’t see the bodies,” demand ed those who
said they were “just asking questions,” then why, they asked,didn’t the
media then report that the families were finally allowed to see the
bodies?
_In fact, as anyone who has watched any of the standard
police procedural dramas that occupy much of television today knows full
well, it is not police procedure to allow the bodies of crime victims
to be immediately inspected by the families. And no, that’s not “just
Hollywood.” That’s how it really works.
_Ask your local policeman.
_In
fact, families were later allowed to view the remains of their dead
loved ones and in several instances (brought to my attention) there were
open caskets for children who had died.
_Here’s the story:
_In
a radio broadcast on Jan. 20, 2013 I had urgently warned truth seekers
not to be taken in by all of this emerging nonsense and came under a
great deal of criticism from many good folks who were fervent believers
in the theory that no children had died and that the stories told by
surviving Sandy Hook teachers (and children) were all lies.
_However,
I was heartened when—during an email exchange between myself and two
well-known and respected patriots, Carol Asher, the longtime assistant
to famed peace officer Jack McLamb, and Ron Neil of the Dollar DVD
Project Liberty (see the website at onedollardvdproject. com)—Ron sent
me this email saying: “You surprised me with your attitude about Sandy
Hook. I respect your opinion and will be more careful on this
subject.You reminded me that we must focus and not get sidetracked.”
_(My
whole point from the start! But most people who had joined the Sandy
Hook frenzy couldn’t quite see that, as Ron Neil clearly did.
_And—to
the heart of the matter—Ron also sent Carol and I a communication from
one of his correspondents who was commenting critically on allegations
that Sandy Hook teacher Kaitlin Roig was a fraud.
_While Roig was
being hailed as a heroine for having rescued her students, there were
truth seekers who had become convinced by the disinformation from the
Crisis Management Conspirators that Roig was an audacious liar.Neil’s
correspondent took issue with the claim—circulating on the Internet—that
Roig wasn’t even a teacher.
_In fact, she wrote: “She [Roig] is
my grandson’s teacher and I know that part is factual,” adding a very
real warning for truth seekers:

_I think
that a huge mistake has been made for the alternative media. We are
looking like "nuts" . . . especially the people that say that nobody
died. My daughter went to several wakes and funerals. And . . . she saw
open caskets. Some of her dear friends lost their children!

_In
the meantime, though, this teacher,Kaitlin Roig, was being called “a
possible Israeli Mossad terrorist” and a “false witness” and was
subjected to the claim that she was really actress Rebekah Fernandez who
was supposedly posing as a fake Sandy Hook teacher—namely Roig!
_So
although there was very real proof that Roig was a Sandy Hook teacher,
there were people who were saying that she was actually a “Crisis
Actor”—much more about the Crisis Actor theories later—who was playing a
part to help perpetrate a gigantic fraud.
_However, one truth
seeker—recognizing that there was something wrong with all of
this—commented in response to an Internet posting of a video of an
interview with Roig that critics “proved” she was a liar, an audacious
actress posing as a heroine:

_What
doesn't make sense to me, too, is that this Kaitlyn Roig is supposed to
be a paid actor, yet she is, or was, a teacher at the time of the
shooting?
_I mean, so let me get this straight: She taught at this school for, how long?
_But,
suddenly, now that this incident happened, and she's giving this report
about what went down in her own classroom, suddenly she's just labeled a
"paid actor," because people think she's lying?

_And—get
this—some of Roig’s critics even thought the fact that Roig was married
immediately after Sandy Hook was additional proof that she just
couldn’t be for real.“If she was so affected by the tragedy,” people
growled,“how could she dare get married?” This was the kind of genuinely
crazy theorizing (and thinking) that the Crisis Management Conspirators
had so effectively conjured up.
_(A personal note: My oldest
brother and his wife were married on the very day just hours her cousin
and two of their childhood friends— who were supposed to attend that
wedding—were killed in a tragic explosion. Nobody—absolutely
nobody—perceived their decision to proceed with the marriage as being
crass or as inappropriate.)
_But in the wake of Sandy Hook, it
became an article of faith that anyone who seemed to affirm
the“official” story in any way was lying. And it was such an attitude
that gripped the minds of truth seekers to the point, as Ron Neil’s
aforementioned correspondent said, that “We are looking like ‘nuts.’”
_But
truth seekers had become so much a part of “The Crowd” that they
couldn’t see what was happening and how they were effectively
discrediting themselves in the minds of the public.
_And then the
fact that the police would not release particular details of the
shooting was said to be “proof” that there was a cover-up. But, again,
the truth is that even a cursory reading of any daily newspaper
reporting on the most mundane of events involving a police investigation
will reveal—time and time again—that the police just simply do not go
about releasing a lot of data while any investigation is going on.
That’s a fact that can be confirmed by even the most casual reference to
any given newspaper in any town or city in the country.
_However,
under the clever contrivance of the Crisis Management
Conspirators,honest truth seekers had become totally distracted,caught
up in minutiae that was absolutely irrelevant but which, nonetheless,
seemed to possess the patriot movement, as if by magic.
_The
proverbial “Crowd” had been caught up in a whirlwind of deliberate
disinformation. It was as though some people genuinely wanted to believe
that nothing—absolutely nothing—was true.That all was a lie. And a lot
of cheap hucksters—along with the Crisis Management Conspirators—played
on this.
_It was even said that the governor of Connecticut had
advance knowledge of the impending “event”—we’ll call it an event,
rather than a shooting, since a lot of people don’t think anybody was
really shot at Sandy Hook in the first place!
_The basis of this rumor was the fact the governor had said publicly that he had been told that such an event could happen.
_What
the governor was saying—and this was no secret—was that public schools
and other venues—public and private, including shopping malls, bus
stations, etc—had been training their own personnel in the matter of
dealing with such an emergency.
_However, the governor’s
comment—based on something that had been widely reported for months,
even years, on end in the mass media (that is, how communities were
preparing to deal with such events)— was twisted and presented as a
Freudian slip that revealed the governor’s foreknowledge of the
impending crisis at Sandy Hook.
_According to one claim, it was
Attorney General Eric Holder (evidently another of the many
conspirators) who briefed the governor a full month in advance that
there was going to be a phony happening at Sandy Hook to be presented to
the public as a “school shooting.”
_How many other public
officials and law enforcement were brought into the loop no one could
really say for sure, but then, again, it had already been suggested (as
noted earlier) that the local police and fire departments were part of
the massacre (or, at least, the cover-up). It seemed like the entire
town was involved. But, then again, there were those who were saying
that no massacre had even really happened!
_It came down to this:
There were some 500 students at Sandy Hook. However, as we’ve said,
some people don’t believe there really was a functioning school there at
all. And it is said that—of those 500 students—20 of them (along with
their families and others) faked their deaths.But some truth
seekers—influenced by the disinformation of the Crisis Management
Conspirators—now question whether at least some—if not all—of these
students ever even existed!
_But accepting the idea that 20
students are no longer officially alive (and thus presumably in hiding)
that means there are some 480 other students (and roughly 960 parents)
and lord knows how many thousands upon thousands of siblings,
grandparents, aunts and uncles related to the “surviving” 480 kids who
are participating in one of the most extraordinary hoaxes of modern
history.
_Meanwhile, others said, Newtown, Connecticut and its
environs was an outpost of Satanism and that most of the people in town
were Satanists.
_That explained why virtually everyone was involved in the conspiracy designed to portray a non-event as a bloody massacre.
_When
sober patriot critics pointed out that Satanists are known to engage in
real blood-letting and don’t generally “fake” such events, preferring
the very real slaughter of little children, those who were advocates of
the theory that “the Satanists” had helped conjure the Sandy Hook hoax
were hard-pressed to respond.
_Others claimed there were people in
Newtown who knew the whole affair was a “hoax” and wanted to speak out
(or who were speaking out privately) but they didn’t want their names
revealed.Those people were either being blackmailed or coerced in some
fashion.
_In other words, an entire community—a town of nearly
30,000 people— was held under such control that not a single person
would (or could) go public and blow the whistle and expose the hoax!
_The
theory is yours to choose: Either most of the people in the town were
Satanists or otherwise somehow in on the plot or most of the people were
somehow being prevented from daring to speak out.
_And part of
the whole big plot—so some say—is that (as we keep reminding you) there
wasn’t even really a functioning school at the structure in Sandy Hook
where the “phony” shooting took place.
_I kid you not.
_Those
unfamiliar with all of the give-and-take that erupted on the Internet
simply have no idea how truly outlandish it all became. It does get a
little confusing, to be sure, but that didn’t stop people from spreading
the stories.
_For God’s sake,don’t let anything stand in the way
of a good story— especially if attracts traffic to your Internet
website (and brings you a bundle full of cash contributions).
_On
one occasion a very prominent “patriot” radio broadcaster extended his
sympathies to the people of Newtown for the lives lost at Sandy Hook and
then,minutes later, on the same broadcast, referred to the matter as a
gigantic hoax that never happened.
_Why the broadcaster felt the
need to extend his sympathy to Newtown for a tragedy that hadn’t really
taken place remains a mystery (to me). But he had a lot of followers who
hung on his every word.
_All of that having been said, it’s no
surprise, when we continue to review the work of Gustave Le Bon—who
provided the playbook for the Crisis Management Conspirators—to see that
Le Bon had been able to project with absolute certainly that the
insertion of wild claims into “The Crowd” would prove a perfect means of
splitting the dissident movement from within.
_Le Bon described
what he called“the intolerance,dictatorialness and conservatism of
crowds,” and recognizing this factor, the Crisis Management Conspirators
played this phenomenon to the hilt.
_These malicious
manipulators knew full well that the moment cautious, detail-oriented,
fact-focused researchers questioned the disinformation and nonsense that
this would enrage those in“The Crowd” who had been coopted into what
had essentially become a Sandy Hook Cult. Here’s how Le Bon put it:

_Crowds
are only cognisant of simple and extreme sentiments; the opinions,
ideas, and beliefs suggested to them are accepted or rejected as a
whole, and considered as absolute truths or as not less absolute
errors.
_This is always the case with beliefs induced by a process of suggestion instead of engendered by reasoning.
_Every
one is aware of the intolerance that accompanies religious beliefs, and
of the despotic empire they exercise on men's minds.
_Being in
doubt as to what constitutes truth or error, and having,on the other
hand, a clear notion of its strength, a crowd is as disposed to give
authoritative effect to its inspirations as it is intolerant.
_An
individual may accept contradiction and discussion; a crowd will never
do so. At public meetings the slightest contradiction on the part of an
orator is immediately received with howls of fury and violent invective,
soon followed by blows, and expulsion should the orator stick to his
point.

_And just as LeBon had suggested, those
honest truth seekers who dared to question the fallacious (and patently
ridiculous) stories that had been injected into discussion of Sandy Hook
came under the most intense fire from otherwise good people—and the
Crisis Management Conspirators absolutely loved it.
_As
incredible as it may seem to readers who will learn of this for the
first time, even those who dared to suggest that perhaps children did
actually die at Sandy Hook were called “traitors” by other patriots who
had bought into the disinformation being inserted into the minds of
patriots via the Crisis Management Conspirators working to discredit
“conspiracy theories” in any form.
_Thanks to the Orwellian
manipulation—very real “mind control” at its best (and worst)—belief in
Sandy Hook as having been a massive hoax was essentially being
instituted as a virtual litmus test as to“who’s a real patriot and who
isn’t.” Those who didn’t believe Sandy Hook was a massive hoax are
denounced as having been “bribed, blackmailed, or coerced” or just
having simply “changed sides.”
_Veteran patriots said they had
never seen anything like it—and they recognized it was because of the
influence of the Internet (or rather, the influence of those Crisis
Management Conspirators who were abusing the Internet for their own
insidious purposes).
_In short, Sandy Hook effectively emerged as
a cult, with its own unique built-in theology that cannot be
questioned. To raise any doubts about the foundation of the cult was—and
still is—considered heresy. Anyone who doubted even the most unlikely
portion of the Sandy Hook theories was portrayed as a “traitor to the
patriot movement”—or that’s what the Crisis Management Conspirators
wanted patriots to think!
_The successful introduction by the
Crisis Management Conspirators of their own disinformation into the
patriot movement had set in motion a very real crisis—in and of
itself—in which real patriots were being crucified for standing up and
calling out the real conspirators for trying to mislead patriots.
_One
longtime critic of gun control was accused of lending support to
pro-gun control forces because he believed children died at Sandy Hook—a
total disconnect, of course, but illustrative of the kind of mindset
that was taking hold.
_Another person was accused of being
“pro-Obama” because he doubted some Sandy Hook theories, the apparent
presumption being that since Sandy Hook took place under the hated
Obama’s watch that anyone who believed the official story therefore had
to be pro-Obama for believing the basic claim that a crazed lone gunman
was responsible.
_(On the other hand, though,as we’ve noted, some
of the others who believed that there was a bigger story to Sandy Hook
believed Israel’s Mossad had carried out the crime in order to hurt
President Obama whereas others believed the Mossad did so in order to
help him.)
_So, as we said, choose your favorite theory—courtesy of Cass Sunstein and the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_It
was almost like Alice in Wonderland—definitely beyond belief. If
there’s one thing we can be certain about, it’s this: There’s more to
the Sandy Hook story than even the most dedicated conspiracy theorists
understand—and that’s why they’ve been “hooked.”
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators (via Internet monitoring) were able to see
preciselyWHO spread the rumors via email and fromWHAT websites and
sources they got their information in the first place.
_As a
direct consequence of this one event and the frenzy surrounding it, the
powers-that-be had an absolute first-ever 24/7 fool-proof method of
monitoring communications and resources within the circles of the
dissident movement.
_The Sandy Hook venture itself was just stage
one in the scheme, giving them the opportunity to observe and weigh the
responses of the conspiracy theorists to the actual events that had
occurred and to monitor their responses to the often-illogical and
contradictory tales being bandied about by the Crisis Management
Conspirators.
_On the broader scale, in the bigger picture, the
Crisis crowd was laying the groundwork to have—in the future—a more
precise, more calibrated focus on the exchange of information by the
conspiracy theorists and to be able to actually dominate and direct the
course of their thinking altogether. And, naturally—if necessary—to
discredit them in no uncertain terms in the minds of the general
population.
_Perhaps even more importantly, the Sunstein-inspired
program of monitoring and manipulation now made it possible to lay the
groundwork—as appropriate—in manipulating opinion during some future
major event, perhaps one already well-planned in advance— another 9-11,
if you will—or some scheme still in the works.
_Sandy Hook was
indeed a “false flag” of the first order—and it had the ultimate impact
of totally misdirecting the attention of patriots from the real forces
that were laying out the misinformation that was so thoroughly
misdirecting them.
_In the end, one of the most respected longtime
patriot voices, Devvy Kidd, dared to put it all in perspective.On April
28, 2013, on her website at newswithviews.com,Kidd laid it on the
line:

_Over the past nearly two
decades,every time some horrific “event” happens,wanna be "journalists"
come out of the wood work with their conspiracy theories based on
absolutely nothing. Bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank
speculation. Irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or
to get people to their web sites.
_They have zero credibility and
hurt the rest of us by being lumped together. I have debunked
conspiracy theories in the past based on documentation. I get attacked
as if I'm the bad guy for pursuing the truth! There are conspiracies and
coverups, but we want the truth, not speculation.

_What
a damned shame there were not more voices of caution raised while the
Sandy Hook affair was in its frenzy. But there were too many people in
“The Crowd” who had been captivated by the virus of manufactured
conspiracy fever that had been spawned in the Mind Control laboratories
of the Crisis Management Conspirators.
_And, if truth be told,
there were many so-called “leaders” of the would-be “truth movement” who
were afraid to dissent, fearful of being called “traitors” and accused
of being “agents of Barack Obama and the NewWorld Order” if they dared
to say that the foolish madness inserted into the minds of truth seekers
(via the machinations of the Conspiracy Management gang) was just that:
a bunch of foolishness.
_The whole Sandy Hook venture was
largely a “private” affair, in that the circumstances surrounding the
event were essentially limited to what did—or did not—take place within
the confines of that elementary school in Newtown.
_However, not
long afterward—on April 15, 2013—with the very “public” event involving
the Boston Marathon (on the very open and public streets of Boston) the
Crisis Management Conspirators were able to fine tune what they had
already honed into a specialized “science”: a tool of Orwellian
manipulation of the first—and worst—order.
_With Boston, the
Sunstein thesis—now a live-action, real-time project in motion, having
been successfully tested with Sandy Hook—was adapted to a much
bigger,more broad-ranging event that (all of the nonsensical theories
accompanying it notwithstanding) had all the earmarks of having been a
very real “false flag”operation of Israel’s Mossad. But, once again, the
truth seekers were misdirected . . .

CHAPTER THIRTY . . .

Who “The Crisis Actors” REALLY Are:

How Truth Seekers Were Manipulated

into Ignoring Genuine “False Flag” Terrorism

and Focusing Instead on Irrelevant Lunacy

_The
manipulation by the Crisis Management Conspirators of the events at
Sandy Hook was, in retrospect, a quite logical response to the
phenomenon of 9-11 truthseeking (much of it Internet-based) which, in
turn, had its own antecedents in the search for the truth surrounding
the Oklahoma City bombing and the JFK assassination so many years
before.
_In that sense,we might suggest, there was indeed a
secret connection, so to speak, between 9-11 and Sandy Hook—but it’s one
that even the most fervent believers in the “big” story of Sandy Hook
never realized, precisely because of the fact they had found themselves
(most of them, to this day, unknowingly) caught in the web of
disinformation being spun by the high-level Crisis Management
Conspirators.
_And one of the biggest cons of all perpetrated
upon the legitimate truth seekers was the legend of “The Crisis
Actors”—mentioned earlier— that came to be an article of faith
surrounding Sandy Hook and later again, even more so, following the
events at the Boston Marathon.
_And as we’ve already noted
(perhaps all too often) in the wake of Sandy Hook many people actually
believed that there hadn’t even been any gunplay at all—that no children
and no adults were shot that day, that it was all a big staged event,
with the purported victims and their families (along with law
enforcement) in on the deal.
_This is where the now
much-discussed topic of “The Crisis Actors” was brought into play.And,
in many respects, it may have been one of the most ingenious scams ever
pawned off on American patriots designed to misdirect their attention.
_It was right out of Cass Sunstein’s playbook.
_During
the wake of Sandy Hook, people got so distracted talking about the
Crisis Actors and the claim that "Lanza was dead the day before the
shooting which really didn't happen and in which no kids were really
killed," that, in many cases, they didn't do what they should have done:
Lobby forcefully against the gun control measures that were being
crafted as a consequence of the tragedy at Sandy Hook.
_Many
patriots became genuinely convinced that by talking about “The Crisis
Actors” that they were winning the day and convincing people of the
dangers of gun control when, in fact, they were actually misdirecting
good people and, for all intents and purposes,discrediting honest
Americans who were opposed to gun control.
_As a result of the
widespread distribution of claims that Sandy Hook was a big fraud being
perpetrated by “Crisis Actors” many Americans concluded that the
opponents of gun control were trouble-makers, wildeyed conspiracy
theorists and just generally to be dismissed.
_That, ultimately,was
the aim of the Crisis Management Conspirators. Their introduction of the
concept of“CrisisActors” into the debate was part and parcel of the
very real conspiracy—first outlined by Cass Sunstein—to discredit
conspiracy theories in general.
_And all of this undoubtedly did
immense damage to the reputation of many good patriots who opposed gun
control and who were led into the trap of focusing on the Crisis Actor
legend rather than on the very real and important issue at hand.
_And
what is so remarkable is that, to this day, although patriotic folks
who regularly discuss Sandy Hook and Boston speak in hushed (and
not-so-hushed) tones about “The Crisis Actors” and the role that they
supposedly played in those events, there is not one single individual
who is able to say precisely “who” it was who first introduced the
concept of the CrisisActors into the vernacular of the Sandy Hook truth
seekers.And that is telling, in and of itself.
_We know, for example,
following the JFK assassination, that it was Mark Lane who largely
popularized the term“grassy knoll”—relating to the likely positioning in
Dealey Plaza of one of the gunmen who fired on President Kennedy.
_But
Lane himself is the first to admit that he first heard the term “grassy
knoll” used by one of the assassination witnesses, Jean Hill,who used
that term in an interview.And Hill herself has said that this just
happened to be the particular phraseology that popped into her head in
seeking a way to describe that geographic location in Dealey Plaza.
_And
that’s how the term “grassy knoll” ultimately came into widespread
parlance, not only in reference to the JFK assassination but also in
reference to “conspiracy theories” in general.
_But there is
absolutely nobody who can explain just who it was who “figured out” that
Crisis Actors had been utilized as part of the Sandy Hook (and later
the Boston Marathon) conspiracy.
_And the reason for that is that
this whole concept of Crisis Actors having been dispatched as part of
the conspiracy was a creation of the Crisis Management Conspirators
themselves.
_Now let it be said that there really are people known as Crisis Actors.They do exist.They’ve been around for a while.
_However,
the proponents of the Crisis Actors theory relating to Sandy Hook (and
later the Boston Marathon) would have people believe that the existence
of CrisisActors is some deep dark secret, that they are part of a
long-standing high-level covert operation kept from the public, perhaps a
creation of Homeland Security or the CIA or some combination of
elements of the emerging American Police State, paid agents of the
vaunted military-industrial-complex.
_It’s an exciting theory, to be
sure, but the truth is that—for years—you have been able go to the
Internet and find a number of Internet websites of real-life
profit-making businesses that train and provide Crisis Actors who
interact with government (local, state and federal) as well as private
industries and enterprises in preparing to deal with crisis events of
various kinds, including mass shootings, hostage situations,
earthquakes, fires, riots—all manner of chaos.
_One such business engaging in the Crisis Actor industry (which is what it amounts to) is crisisactors.org.
_On the website of that company, their promotional material reads:
“Crisis
Actors: Trained Players and Actors Making it Real,” stating that their
mission is: “Helping schools and first responders create realistic
drills, full-scale exercises, high-fidelity simulations, and interactive
3D films.” The website even includes a section called “Crisis Acting
News” highlighting a variety of events in which their skills and
services have been utilized (and openly publicized in newspapers and
televised by broadcast outlets in local communities across the country).
_Here
are just a few examples from crisisactors.org, citing Internet links to
some of the newspapers and broadcast outlets that have cited the work
of Crisis Actors in their particular communities.

_All
across the United States today there are members of local police and
fire departments, emergency response units—even members of the National
Guard—who have worked with CrisisActors on a regular basis.
_The
existence, then, of Crisis Actors is no big secret. But it wasn’t until
the Crisis Management Conspirators deliberately hyped the legend (via
the Internet) that Crisis Actors were part of the conspiracy at Sandy
Hook that many people became aware of their existence.
_The Crisis
Management Conspirators inserted the legend of the Crisis Actors onto
the Internet with the expectation that it would become a part of the
lore of Sandy Hook and help add confusion and—more importantly—play a
significant part in discrediting conspiracy theories and conspiracy
theorists in the minds of the broad general public.
_Essentially, in
relation to Sandy Hook, in particular, the Crisis Actors Theory held
that, for example, Robbie Parker, the father of one of the children
killed at Sandy Hook,was actually a Crisis Actor.
_The claim
was based on the fact that—just prior to giving a public statement
expressing his horror at the loss of his child—Parker smiled and laughed
and then asked if the cameras were on yet and then,while speaking,
referred to written notes. Nobody who had actually lost a child under
such tragic circumstances, it was proclaimed,would actually smile or
laugh.Nor would they need to refer to written notes.
_Such
allegations are patently ridiculous. People react differently to
tragedy. Some people put on a brave face when confronted with
tragedy.And most people have never been confronted with a horde of
reporters and television cameras converging on their home in the wake of
such an internationally-publicized tragedy in which they (and their
dead child) have unwittingly become a part.
_The idea someone would
need to rely on notes to speak publicly is not so outrageous.Very few
people are trained in public speaking and often need notes, just as even
professional speakers rely on written texts when giving their own
presentations. But the fact that Robbie Parker was using notes was
suddenly “proof” that he was a Crisis Actor!
_So when the Crisis
Management Conspirators put out the idea that Robbie Parker was a Crisis
Actor whose child hadn’t been killed, Parker began receiving threats
for “play acting” and the controlled media (allied with the Crisis
Management Conspirators) immediately brought this to the attention of
the general public who were quite correctly horrified that “those
conspiracy theorists”would actually question the grief of a mourning
parent and suggest that he was “faking” his child’s death.
_What most
of those who bought into the idea Parker was a Crisis Actor never
seemed to consider was the point that if he was a Crisis Actor, he
probably wouldn’t have needed written notes when he “performed” for the
cameras. Actors—you see—rely upon their skills to remember their
lines.Actors generally don’t use cue cards or at least not ones that
they hold right there in front of them while speaking!
_Later, it
was even alleged that Parker’s dead child was actually photographed in
the presence of Barack Obama when he visited Newtown to meet with the
families. In other words, that the “phony” Parker and his family (all
part of the conspiracy) had brazenly dared to allow the supposedly dead
child to be shown to be alive after it was said that she had been killed
at Sandy Hook.
_The claim was based on the fact that the surviving
sisters of the dead child bore a striking resemblance to the victim—that
happens in families, you know—and that one of the children in the
picture with Obama seemed to be wearing the same dress that the dead
child had previously been photographed wearing.That was “proof” that it
was the dead child who was, it was said, still alive.
_But any family
with multiple sons or daughters knows that the clothing of older
children is passed on to younger children. But then, again,when it came
time to promote the idea of Crisis Actors—and the theme that “no
children died at Sandy Hook”—simple points such as that seemed to get
lost in the Crisis Management Conspiracy Barndance.
_In another
instance, a parent of one of the dead children was accused of being a
Crisis Actor because the parent said in an interview that one of his
surviving children said that she wanted to urge President Obama to
support gun control. No child in grade school, it was said, would be
thinking about a political issue such as gun control. Especially, it was
added, after one of her siblings had been killed.
_The idiocy of
such a claim should be obvious. School children do have political
opinions and even “vote” in mock presidential elections every four
years—from first grade through graduation—even if they don’t necessarily
understand the political issues.
_Young children do know who the
president is and in this “Information Age” they do hear about issues
such as gun control, in particular, on a 24/7 basis, whether or
television or radio or even on the Internet, and especially after such a
crisis as Sandy Hook.
_And it’s entirely possible that a child who
had lost a sibling at a school shooting would want to express her
concerns about gun control to “the president” who is perceived as the
man who rules America and who makes important decisions about big issues
such as gun control.
_In fact, they said, a lot of the well-known
Sandy Hook personalities featured in the media were actors—why, they
never even lived in Sandy Hook at all! (Just as they had said that the
school was not even a functioning school at the time of the purported
shooting!)
_Various cuts of what is called“raw”media footage of one
Sandy Hook celebrity—a notably obnoxious character named Gene Rosen (a
veritable stereotype for a particular type of Jewish caricature often
seen in Hollywood comedy)—telling bits and pieces of what he claimed to
have seen, was cited as proof Rosen had “practiced” his lines (like an
actor) and that the story he was telling was just not true.
_Rosen—who
was clearly a publicity hound who reveled in his brief brush with the
proverbial “15 minutes of fame”—was over-the-top to the point of being
annoying and—in fact—the media people who had interviewed Rosen had
taped him at various moments and Rosen was clearly fine-tuning, even
rehearsing what he was about to say in the various “cuts” of the raw
footage that later popped up on the Internet.
_As such it was
immediately insinuated that Rosen was a Crisis Actor dispatched by the
powers-that-be to craft a bit of film propaganda for the benefit of the
American public to help perpetrate the“lie” that there had been a
shooting at the school.
_But here is what is important to remember . . .
_What
all of the patriot conspiracy theorists seemed to miss was this big
question: How was it that this raw footage—taped by a cameramen from the
Controlled Media—just happened to be leaked to the conspiracy theorists
as “proof” that Rosen was a Crisis Actor?_Clearly, there were
people in the Controlled Media—in league with the Crisis Management
Conspirators—who were deliberately helping propagate the legend of the
Crisis Actors by leaking raw footage such as this.
_They knew
with absolute certainty that the people in “The Crowd” who had bought
into the CrisisActors theory would jump on the Rosen story in a
heartbeat.And that is precisely what they did.
In the end, you see, the real CrisisActors were not the parents of the murdered children (or even the ridiculous Gene Rosen).
_Instead
the Crisis Actors were actually those “cyber shills” (posing as “truth
seekers”) who were acting out a very specific role—acting on behalf of
the Crisis Management Conspirators—in bombarding the Internet with all
of the outlandish stories that distracted patriots and truth seekers
from the big picture and thereby helping discredit all forms of
conspiracy theories (and conspiracy theorists) in general.
_It’s just so damned obvious.
_In fact, it’s typical Zionist Israeli trickery:
_(1) Operating in plain sight;
_(2)
Standing there in vampire’s garb,pointing at someone dressed as an
angel, and shouting,“There’s the vampire over there!” and
_(3) Thoroughly distracting everyone from the big picture.
This
frequent Zionist tactic of accusing others of what they are in fact
guilty of has been aptly described as “accusatory projection” or
“accusatory inversion.”
_The Crisis Actors theme got ever more
ridiculous as the story was repeated again and again.At one point it
was even claimed a catering truck—said to be on the scene at Sandy
Hook—had been dispatched to cater food and beverages for the Crisis
Actors at work perpetuating the conspiracy, just as—it was pointed
out—catering trucks will be found on the scene when Hollywood films are
being made “on location.”
_I’ve personally seen one of these catering
trucks parked just a few blocks from my own home on Capitol Hill in
Washington, D.C. when actor Clint Eastwood was filming a rooftop chase
scene for his action film In the Line of Fire.Despite this, however, I
sincerely doubt that the Sandy Hook “conspiracy” was so fine-tuned that
the conspirators sent a catering truck to keep the Crisis Actors at
Sandy Hook well nourished.
_Yet, I am here to tell you that the
Crisis Management Conspirators managed to convince a lot of well meaning
people that this is actually what really happened. (Oh, those nasty
caterers—conspirators all!)
_And here’s something about the Crisis
Actors disinformation that needs to be mentioned—and this will astound
many readers who will learn about this for the first time . . .
_In
fact, one of the most vociferous proponents of the Crisis Actors
theory—a character who uses the name “DallasGoldbug”—also put forth the
following assertions regarding other “actors” he claims to have
discovered posturing in the public arena:

_• John F. Kennedy did not die in Dallas but reinvented himself as future president Jimmy Carter;
_• A single woman posed as not only actress Marilyn Monroe but also former First Ladies Jacqueline Kennedy and Rosalyn Carter;
_• Former Vice President Nelson Rockefeller was really country and western singer Tex Ritter;
_• Billionaire David Rockefeller is actually popular conspiracy theorist Jordan Maxwell;
_• David Rockefeller, Jr. is another popular conspiracy theorist William Cooper (who was killed by police in 2001);
_• Famed country singer Patsy Cline posed as Marina Oswald, the wife of JFK’s accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald;
_• Comic actor Chevy Chase poses as Sen. Jay Rockefeller;
_• Former Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo is now posing as “America’s Toughest Sheriff” Joe Arpaio of Arizona;
_• Infamous Nazi figure Adolf Eichmann was really the popular singer and motion picture star Bing Crosby; and
_• No less than Adolf Hitler was actually Walt Disney.

_And here are three of my personal favorites from“Dallas Goldbug” involving three individuals whom I have known quite well:

_DallasGoldbug
posted “convincing” video and photographic evidence that“proved”these
contentions, yet many who were caught up in the claims about Crisis
Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston had no idea that the Crisis Actors story
was also inextricably linked to this lunacy.
_In fact, Gustave
LeBon—the grand guru of the the Crisis Management Conspirators—had
described how the “crowd” could be dazzled by all sorts of images and in
the aftermath of the Boston Maraton bombing, “The Crowd” of our modern
day was indeed captivated by dazzling images which they believed
“proved” that there had been hanky panky on the streets of Boston.
_In
fact, many "truth seekers" picked up the stories being put out by the
phony patriots—the Crisis Actors working for the Sunstein gang—that
there wasn't even really any bombing at all! It was akin to the
claim—which had already proven successful in winning credence with the
real patriots—that there hadn’t even been a shooting at Sandy Hook.
_And
while the whole story of what really happened at Boston has yet to be
unraveled,what we do know is that two young Muslims (the Tsarnaev
brothers) were accused of the crime—yet another Muslim “false flag” akin
to the 9-11 tragedy.
_And we also know that evidence indicates that
the intelligence services of the United States, Russia—and certainly
Israel—had their eyes on the Tsarnaevs for a long time prior to the
bombing, just as the ADL and other Israeli-connected elements were
“monitoring” Timothy McVeigh prior to the Oklahoma City bombing.
_However—at
this juncture—we don’t know the entire scenario, but we do know there
has been a lot of disinformation put into circulation designed to
deflect attention away from Israel which is certainly (beyond question)
the prime beneficiary of the crime as a consequence of the purported
danger from the Muslim world continuing to be in the forefront of the
mind (and concerns) of the American people.
_In short, Boston was simply a replay of the 9-11 false flag that redirected American thinking in the wake of that tragedy.
_It
was a reinvigoration of the template for terror utilized in 9-11 and in
the Oklahoma bombing and in the JFK assassination involving, yet again,
the widespread dissemination of carefully-crafted disinformation
designed to cover Israeli involvement in those acts of terror.
_(For
my own part, from the beginning, it has been my opinion that Israel was
behind the Boston bombing for the precise purpose of conjuring up
another Muslim“false flag.” I expressed this view in a broadcast
interview at theuglytruth.wordpress.com with Mark Glenn who shares my
view on this matter.)
_Yet, the Crisis Management Conspirators
successfully distracted truth seekers—who were convinced that, once
again, the authorities were covering up the truth about the Boston
bombing—by cranking up the Crisis _Actors legend (first spawned in the
wake of Sandy Hook).
_Rather than focusing on who was behind the
bombing, truth seekers focused instead on stories—with accompanying
videos and photographic images of the chaos following the
bombing—planted on the Internet in conjunction with the insistent claim
that Crisis Actors were busy on the streets of Boston detaching false
arms and legs and faking injuries and throwing around buckets of stage
blood for the benefit of video cameras.
_All of the imagery captured
the attention of the patriots who suddenly showed little—if any—interest
in trying to determine who was responsible for the Muslim “false flag”
that the Controlled Media was waving in the face of a horrified American
public.
_Here is how Le Bon described precisely this kind of manipulation.

_Crowds
being only capable of thinking in images are only to be impressed by
images. It is only images that terrify or attract them and become
motives of action.
_For this reason theatrical representations, in
which the image is shown in its most clearly visible shape, always have
an enormous influence on crowds. Bread and spectacular shows constituted
for the plebeians of ancient Rome the ideal of happiness, and they
asked for nothing more.
_Throughout the successive ages this ideal
has scarcely varied. Nothing has a greater effect on the imagination of
crowds of every category than theatrical representations.
_The entire
audience experiences at the same time the same emotions, and if these
emotions are not at once transformed into acts, it is because the most
unconscious spectator cannot ignore that he is the victim of illusions,
and that he has laughed or wept over imaginary adventures.

_Le
Bon realized—and the Crisis Management Conspirators recognized that he
was absolutely correct—that these kind of images were ideal for the
purpose of Crowd Control and mass manipulation:

_Whatever
strikes the imagination of crowds presents itself under the shape of a
startling and very clear image, freed from all accessory explanation, or
merely having as accompaniment a few marvellous or mysterious facts:
examples in point are a great victory, a great miracle, a great crime,
or a great hope. Things must be laid before the crowd as a whole, and
their genesis must never be indicated.
_A hundred petty crimes or
petty accidents will not strike the imagination of crowds in the least,
whereas a single great crime or a single great accident will profoundly
impress them, even though the results be infinitely less disastrous than
those of the hundred small accidents put together.

_In
the wake of Boston, the theme of “Crisis Actors” got further (and quite
considerable) mileage with the use of such imagery.With Le Bon’s
assertions about “The Crowd”—and its susceptibility to incorporating
such images into its thinking—the Crisis Management gang kept conspiracy
theorists busy.
_One widely circulated proof of the “conspiracy” was
a selection of several frames from a video of the bombing. A few frames
were “analyzed”—a few frames that represented just a few seconds of
time—and were “found” to show a woman (said to be a Crisis Actor)
“giving hand signs” and helping other Crisis Actors fake blood and
injuries.
_To do all of this—live—before very REAL people who were
not Crisis Actors but who WERE on the scene, would take more than
seconds to accomplish successfully.
_Anyone who has ever participated
in the taping of a television show or even an amateur home movie—let
alone a serious film production—knows how much time and work is involved
making just one “incident” look real, -and that it can’t be
accomplished in just seconds!
_But most people—including a lot of
good patriots—have never been involved in any such production and don’t
have any idea that even one second in, for example, an old-style 8mm
movie, can amount to as many as 18 different frames. Meaning, of course,
that those who were microanalyzing the films that they said “proved”
there had been fakery were actually analyzing milli-seconds, for God’s
sake!
_Such simple facts were lost in the “Crisis Actors Shuffle” that accompanied the frenzy over the Boston bombing.
_A
lot of good patriots fell into what we might call, for want of a better
way of describing it,“the Trap of Belief,” because they had become
familiar, in years past, with people who were quite accurately and
correcting analyzing the famous (although remarkably brief) bit of film
known as the Zapruder Film of the JFK assassinaton.
_Again and again
over the years a variety of analysts had de-constructed the film, frame
by frame, to demonstrate the point that it was clear, on film, that the
official Warren Commission version of the JFK assassination was
repudiated by what purported to be an actual amateur 8mm film taken at
the time of the JFK assassination.
_(Now, ironically, there are those
who say that Zapruder film itself is some sort of forgery or an altered
version of the original film or even a combination of several films
made to appear to be one.And the truth is that past and present
technology does make such things possible.)
_As such, having seen
(over some 50 years) such analysis of the Zapruder film (and other
images of the JFK assassination) again and again, on video, on the
Internet, in books and magazines, patriots and truth seekers became
accustomed to this technique of conspiracy inquiry.And knowing that this
was the case, following Sandy Hook and Boston, the Crisis Management
Conspirators went assiduously to work and deliberately played on this
when they began hyping the claims that Crisis Actors had staged false
injuries (in a fake bombing) for the benefit of the American population
at large.
_The consequence of this was that when honest truth-seekers
began circulating the stories that videos of the bombing were “fakes,”
many serious-minded folks in the general public began to think, quite
frankly, that these truth seekers were just plain crazy.
_There were
people from all over the United States who had come to the Boston
Marathon and they went home to tell friends and family about their
narrow brush with disaster,only to hear that there were conspiracy
theorists on the Internet who were saying that the bombing didn’t happen
and that nobody really lost an arm or a leg.
_And the“proof”was a
few seconds of one film that went viral on the Internet which convinced
the truth seekers that it was all a big lie!
_If you have any doubts
about this, go out and purchase a DVD of some current“action”film and
listen to the director’s commentary.You’ll learn how, for example, one
scene in a Hollywood film which occupies just a second or two (on film)
can actually take up to as much as two or three days to film (sometimes
on multiple locations,no less) not to mention the introduction of a wide
array of computer-generated imagery and other technological
advances,many of which didn’t even exist as little as ten or fifteen
years ago.
_Did you really think that was a big ship sinking in the middle of the North Atlantic in James Cameron’s classic film Titanic?
_Did you really think that real people were falling down and hurting themselves as the ship sank?
_Of course you didn’t!
_In
fact, some of the most mundane moments in that wide-ranging disaster
film were actually the work of clever Hollywood legerdemain.
_Even
the relatively brief and simple scene of the film’s romantic duo—Kate
Winslett and Leonardo DiCaprio—at the stern of the ship whenWinslett’s
character is threatening to jump overboard and commit suicide involved
endless hours of filming using several different stages and multiple
means of technological wizardry.
_If you were among those who were
caught up in the legends surrounding Crisis Actors at the Boston
Marathon and the stories on the Internet purporting to analyze just a
moment or two of the events that took place there, then read that
preceding paragraph again—no, in fact, read it twice—and consider the
ramifications . . .
_As we said—and this is critical to
understand—the point is that even a moment of drama on film can take
literally days to produce and simply can not be carried out in just a
few split seconds.
But those Crisis Management Conspirators who
have been purveying the Crisis Actors false flag to mislead truth
seekers know that most people have no idea how technologically advanced
film-making has become, even at the same time it remains time-consuming
and requires vast participation by multiple people at various levels So,
then, in the context of the events at the Boston Marathon,what does all
of this mean?
_It’s very simple . . .
_If the conspirators
behind the events in Boston wanted to produce a piece of film to
convince unwittingAmericans that a bombing did take place which injured
many people—including those who lost arms and legs—they did not have to
dispatch hordes of “Crisis Actors” onto the scene to engage in
complicated motions of “reacting” to a bomb and then rolling about on
the crowd pretending to be injured, hysterically clinging to severed
arms and legs, throwing about fake blood, etc.
_That just isn’t how it works.
_IF
there HAD been a major conspiracy to "fake" all of these things, the
whole process COULD (and WOULD) have been done beforehand using
high-tech computer generated images produced in a laboratory.
_The
so-called Crisis Actors didn't even have to be ANYWHERE NEAR the bomb
site and positioned where "honest witnesses" could have seen anything
suspicious such as what has been claimed to have happened.
_For
serious truth seekers—particularly those who were caught up in the
legend of Crisis Actors at Boston who were purportedly busy faking
injuries, throwing around fake blood, detaching prosthetic legs and
arms, etc—a careful review of the wide-ranging “special features”
section of the DVD of James Cameron’s Titanic is well worth their time.
_And
the truth is that since Cameron’s classic first appeared on the screen
in 1997—16 years ago—computer technology has grown by extraordinary
leaps and bounds, such that Cameron’s own remarkable visual graphics in
Titanic are, in many respects, almost extraordinarily antiquated by many
new developments in the field.
_In fact, the “special features”
section of virtually any DVD of any motion picture or television
drama—especially those involving a lot of action—often provide a literal
step-by-step videographic run-down of the amazing techniques of
film-making, in particular the amazing CGI—computer-generated
imagery—that has become so prevalent in even the most minimal ways that
the average viewer would never expect.
_For example, on the DVD of
the third season of the now-defunct crime drama,Body of Proof, one can
see how outdoor scenes (filmed in Los Angeles but supposedly taking
place in Philadelphia) are altered via CGI to eliminate palm trees from
the image that is finally seen by the television viewer. Another scene
deconstructed on that DVD demonstrates how the image (and sound) of a
railroad train moving through a railroad yard is completely erased by
CGI, such that all of the other action (and sound) taking place remains
undisturbed.
_In other words, film-making technology has reached such a highly-advanced level that:
_•
Virtually any scene or event can practically be conjured out of almost
thin air.What appears to be a human speaking and moving about may, in
fact, be a CGI, or even a robot with a talking, smiling human face
imposed by computer upon it.
_• Any piece of real film imagery can be
so altered that the final version of the film completely eliminates
action that did take place or altered to include action that actually
took place elsewhere and was then inserted by computer onto that
imagery.
_Now—when confronted with such realities about the nature of
film production and how quite ridiculous it is to suggest that Crisis
Actors engaged in such complex (and quite unnecessary) on-site antics in
Boston—a lot of red-faced truth seekers (who do realize they have been
conned) fall back on the claim that the high-level conspirators behind
Boston deliberately staged faulty video presentations that were easily
“refutable” because—they say—the conspirators actually wanted the
American people to know that the Boston bombing was a hoax.
_The apparent underlying theme here is that “Nothing is for real.
Everything
is a lie. And the people who are responsible for these lies actually do
want people to know that they are lies.That the people can do nothing
to combat this conspiracy that operates in tandem with the Controlled
Media in America.”
_That sounds good. It has a certain appeal to a
certain mindset. But it doesn’t reflect the reality that, in fact, most
Americans simply do not have any idea that the Internet is rife with
rumors about Crisis Actors.
_But what a growing number of Americans
do believe—as a consequence f propaganda from the Controlled Media—is
that those people who are called “conspiracy theorists” by the media
have some really crazy ideas and that they don’t believe that there was
really a shooting in Sandy Hook that took the lives of 20 little
children or that there wasn’t even really a bombing in Boston.
_And
many Americans now believe that anything that reeks of a conspiracy
theory—even relating to the JFK assassination or the Oklahoma bombing or
9-11—is the work of paranoid minds whose opinions are to be dismissed,
along with (in particular) the idea that Israel had anything to do with
those tragedies.
_That was precisely the design of those who helped
make the truth seekers look “crazy” by feeding them a diet of
extraordinary claims about Sandy Hook and Boston that took hold on the
Internet like wildfire, even as the Crisis Management Conspirators were
monitoring the communication networks between patriots here in the
United States (and around the world) who were disseminating these
stories.
_The bottom line is that what many came to believe about
Crisis Actors at Sandy Hook and Boston (along with other similar
nonsense) is just one big fat fraud—a lie—a distraction—deliberately
perpetrated by the Crisis Management Conspirators to make truth seekers
look silly._The real “BIG STORY” that has not yet set in or been realized and understood is this:
_The
Crowd Control (and very real Mind Control) tactics—first laid out by
Cass Sunstein—have been successfully set in motion and the long-term
damage to serious inquiry into very real conspiracies—past and present
and those of the future—has been costly and inestimable.
_We can only
imagine what will happen when another very real crisis comes along and
wonder what kind of “management”—or mismanagement as the case may
be—will occur.We can only ponder the manner in which truth seekers will
be once again be utterly misdirected and further marginalized.
_What
happened with Sandy Hook and Boston is a very real lesson America’s
“alternative” media should learn from—before it’s too late.