If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

swede, you do know the difference between bull'beep', millionaire playboy, tights at night wearing and reality don't you????

And as far as "letting" any girl have too much freedom is concerned, my ONLY restriction or demand that I place on my girl is that she not 'beep' other guys and stay away from drugs. That's reality my friend.

As I have not yet read any pertinent response to my post from Feb 14 2008 : 18:04:41, and presently being a bit bored as I messed up my knee and am laid up this weekend, all I have left is another three Olgas update...

It's a tad dreary here at "Stately Smoks Manor". No rain, but plenty of clouds and no sunshine. The Olgas found the emergency flare gun in my 55 foot dingy which is docked next to the 1:1 scale replica of the Queen Elizabeth that I had commissioned and built a few years ago.

They were firing off flares in an attempt to "create" the effect of a sunny day, which I might have considered to be quite creative had they not set the boat house ablaze. Fortunately, all US Naval personell are trained in firefighting, and my security force of 20 former US Navy SEALs was able to quickly subdue the flames.

As punishment, I have told the Olgas they are to write "I will not play with flare guns" 100 times on the blackboard, and no "Green Acres" reruns for the rest of the weekend. I would have simply spanked them as I did once before, but they only scream, "Ooooo, yes daddy, harder harder, I've been a very bad little malyshka!", seem to enjoy it too much and keep getting back in line???

As for your concerns that I spoil them, the pole only cost $120, so when you split that three ways, it really isn't that big of an expense, considering the joy it brings to their shining little faces.

Hopefully, we will soon return to the more mentally challenging topics with deeper meaning as I have come to miss having to take more than three minutes to express my thoughts and type a posting.

Biorn is now in UA to meet Elena. For a while at the passportcontrol it looked like he wasn't going to make it, because some official insisted, that Biorn's visa was invalid from being issued as long time ago as three days, and that he would have to pay for another one. And some other official tried to press him to buy a travel insurance, which he didn't need, because he already has one.

Biorn is now sitting in a bar, waiting for Elena to arrive. He has, compared to his usual standard, dressed himself up. He's wearing a combination of the two most agressive hues of blue and yellow, it is possible to find in the sartorial world. He has done so, because these are the swedish colours, and he wants the world to know, where he comes from. The problem is, that while this blend of colours is quite acceptable on a flag, it was never meant to be used for clothes. Besides, blue and yellow are the symbols for the two biggest political parties in UA, two parties which sad to say don't love each other as much as they could. Especially around electiontimes, a big part of the communication between them is done with stones (or other available missiles), clubs and burning of cars. So wearing blue and yellow together is asking for trouble. Ukranians are very serious about politics.

Biorn has also cut a foot off his beard, though leaving so much of it, that it merciful hides the nude woman embroidered on his tie. (The amputed part of the beard has been used to make a nest for the bird usually living in it. A neighbour of Biorn is taking care of it).

Elena on the other hand is tastefully, if sparsely, dressed, when she arrives. She, and her silicone reinforced body, seems to be one big invitation to forbidden sins. So much, that even the hardened local men give her an extra look.

Together Biorn and Elena is a striking couple and all the other guests at the bar stare at them in horrified fascination. The older generation has ofcourse heard interminable stories about the decadent west, and now looking at Biorn, they for the first time in their lives start to wonder, if the stories maybe weren't true. Nobody can dress this way and not be decadent.

Elena has ofcourse met contrybumpkins before, but they have mostly been of american breed. Dancing around her, never asking about the price of her whims, opening cardoors, taking her to poshy restaurants and in general being wimps. But Biorn is very different. He sits there in his abominable suit, with his beerbarrelbody and his beard, and looks as if everything is honky dory. His total lack of contact with the current version of social reality has made him an innocent.

But in spite of Biorn's obvious shortcomings, Elena is a little impressed, both because she herself is a complete victim of socially accepted appearances, being unable to go against fashion, and also because the professional in her understands, that this will not be a routine assignment. After several periods filled with ultimate boredom from american men, all suffering from Oedipus complexes in various degrees, she will now meet a challenge, worthy her talents.

Biorn on his part is quite sure, that he will almost make it with Elena. Almost making it being as far as his imagination streches, based on former experience.

"Hopefully, we will soon return to the more mentally challenging topics with deeper meaning as I have come to miss having to take more than three minutes to express my thoughts and type a posting."

I'm very happy to hear, that your brain doesn't overheat, when we have lengthy exchanges of a deeper type.

Maybe I will be a bit less mentally stale tomorrow, and sending you some pertinence. But already now I can say, that I am not so far from you in my basics of existence. It's only, that I want knowns instead of beliefs.

Some of my knowns include existence of higher powers, small grey ETs,
and most incredible, the existence of a few honest FSUW, possible even on cyberdating. But this last possibilty is the lowest ranking amongst these examples.

As I have mentioned before, the subject of the psychology of sexual and emotional attraction (finding polarities?) could maybe be of interest.

I have also another idea. It seems, that newcomers, unfamiliar with scamming, turns up regularly. Maybe a kind of very general summing up of facts/and wellbased speculations would be a help. We could update it once a month. In a few days I will start making a sketch for this, where everything will be in one place. But there's a lot of things I don't know, mostly about the technical aspects and procedures.

quote:I have also another idea. It seems, that newcomers, unfamiliar with scamming, turns up regularly. Maybe a kind of very general summing up of facts/and wellbased speculations would be a help. We could update it once a month. In a few days I will start making a sketch for this, where everything will be in one place. But there's a lot of things I don't know, mostly about the technical aspects and procedures.

Personally, I would welcome such a discussion as to initiate some new blood and a fresh perspective here. Openning a more directly scammer related discussion would give interest to the new comers, before we bore them with our run-on sentences and deeper meanings to the issue.

As long the general rules of no spitting on the floor (we in the civilized world use a spitune), and refraining from the use of four letter expletives to make a point, all are welcome to present their views and give their input.

Today I wrote the promised "introduction" to newcomers to the scammingscene and posted it here. But admin has decided to give it its own track, which is fine with me. So anybody interested can find it http://www.stop-scammers.com/forum/t...p?TOPIC_ID=976. If this new track turns out to be of interest, I will, with a little help from my friends, update it from time to time and mention this updating here.

Hi Tone, (for everybody else, this is an answer to a post on another track).

as you maybe have understood, my own wiev of politics is not so much based upon any special political ideology (though some of them are closer to my ideas than others), but rather on how the individual's personal integrity is respected. That's why I f.ex. theoretically can accept both the extrem right in SOME forms (I'm a big admirer of Heinlein, though he does go too far at times in his superman philosophy). And the extreme left (as f.ex. the anarchists). And the true middle liberalism.

But this is theory. We must also look at the social "reality", in which human nature playes a big role.

So even if an ideology looks very attractive in theory, it doesn't help very much, if people have to be readjusted to fit into it. It should be the other way round, and that means ofcourse that a lot of the original good ideas will have to be skipped or at least postponed until later; and as human beings differ very much in their personal characters, a lot of compromises must be done. Your idea of trafic-speedlimits is probably different from mine, the level of society's collective responsibility for those who can't take care of themselves can be discussed etc.

The resulting patchwork is democracy in all its rainbowcoloured hues. I will be the first to admit, that it's far from perfect, but it does contain a possibility of growth towards better models.

Let's go back to the startingpoint. Respect for the individuals rights and accept, that this is not 100% realistic. There MUST be a common set of certain rules. Like it or not (I don't, but I can see the necessity). The question is, how much is it reasonable to let these common rules encompass? Shall they dictate, what a person is allowed to do in his private life (as a complete individual person, without involving others in his activities)? Examples as f.ex. what religion, recreative drugs, sexual orientation or dressing/body-style s/he chooses, can be mentioned.

This is where MY assumptions start. Let everybody do, as s/he wants, as long as it doesn't interfere with other peoples' lives. And if such a person after fair warning as to the consequences of her/his actions still insists on going on in this direction, well, then s/he also has the right to go straight to 'beeb', without any guarantee of sympathy or help from society. (If someone wants to help on a private basis in such situations, that would be fine with me).

It sounds very drastic, but in reality it isn't so. Mostly people want to be in some kind of social context (job, friends, family, parenthood, economical, legal or practical involvment in society etc) and according to my definition, the common set of rules MUST be followed, when you are in a social context.

It's ONLY when you alone (or together with consenting, adult like-minded), without interfering in others lives, without practising cruelty to animals or destroying something, you have freedom. In that case, I personally would find it acceptable, if a person would dance around stark raving naked, screaming obscenities, worshipping strange gods, taking whatever drug s/he wanted to use and having sex in unorthodox forms. And ofcourse "pay the bill" in her/his life her/himself.

All societies have their own version of what is allowed or acceptable. Sometimes cannabis, but not alcohol, is the accepted recreational drug. Sometimes sexual freedom exists. Sometimes pornography is allowed. A religion can be almost obligatory one place and heretic another place. Etc.etc.etc.

All this versions of what is "correct" for the individual are stuff and nonsense, it's just rules made by the topdogs, because THEY want it so.

And this is where my ideas differ standard. I think, we should get rid off all these idiotic taboos we have.

Freedom with total responsibilty isn't that complicated. It means, that we privately can take and have as much freedom as we want, if we also take the corresponding responsibilty for our actions. And I must repeat: This doesn't function in social contexts, only privately.

This would not disrupt the social structure (people do a lot of these things anyway, thus making them "criminals" sometimes). We could still have law and order, a functional economic system, schooling etc.

I wanted to make my basics clear, before I start on a discussion of various political models, because political ideologies often mirror a lot of belief-system thinking, taboos or plain totalitarian'ism.