6 Replies

http://www.wishnow.com/starwars/#That's the website for Tatooine or Bust (and "Star Wars or Bust"). Unfortuantely the hosting site for the quicktime stream has gone down... But there's an e-mail to ask the producer Jason Wishnow.

Originally posted by: baby humThey're an upcoming release of mine. When i get the time that is.

Any chance that they could be a part of a separate series of releases, apart from the current ongoing babyhum collection? The reason is, I draw a distinct line between things like 'sanctioned films documenting or pertaining to Star Wars' and 'unsanctioned fan films/documentaries about fans'. These two docs are purely of the latter category. Both types of films have their place, but they really don't belong on the same shelf, so to speak.

Just something to consider. I respect your work greatly, and I don't want to tell you how you should do your releases.

Is there some connection between the naming convention "baby hum" and Star Wars i'm not getting? I personally understand the difference between officially sanctioned LFL material and fan created material on SW, but i've never gotten the sense that the baby hum releases we're going to stick to SW forever. (I know there was a thread on preserving Miyazaki, started by baby hum for instance) I've always viewed the names people use to preserve stuff as their mark to show what they appreciate. If those nameing conventions go away from material i'm not interested in, so be it. But i guess the completeist in many of us (it's nice to view the covers in chronological order which all have a common theme...), would like one name to be only for one type of material. But there's bound to be disagreements along the way. Can always 'inverse' the cover art to show off the aprocraphal nature of non official LFL material. I'm happy in whatever format/naming convention the re-creator puts it out as.none