Indictments Announced in Elaborate Mortgage Fraud Scheme

Joshua Brown, 29, Brockton, Massachusetts, real estate investor; Brian Frank, 32, New Hartford, New York, real estate investor; John Sweetland, 28, Yorba Linda, California, real estate investor; mortgage brokers Linda Defeo, 28, Springfield, Massachusetts; Brian Arrington, 39, Boston, Massachusetts; and former attorney Bruce Namenson, 47, Walpole, Massachusetts have been charged for their roles in a complex scheme in which fraudulent documents were used to defraud homeowners and mortgage lenders in real estate transactions involving 26 distressed properties in the Greater Boston, Massachusettsarea. Authorities allege that Brown, Frank and Sweetland fraudulently obtained approximately $12.5 million in loans from more than a dozen financial lending institutions to purchase multi-family homes, from which they made approximately $2 million dollars in proceeds. The defendants are charged as follows:

The Attorney General’s Office began an investigation into the defendants’ alleged activities in April 2008, after receiving complaints from homebuyers. Investigators discovered that Brown operated Boston Equity Investments (“BEI”) in Boston, while Frank operated Freedom Equity Investments (FEI) in Hillsborough, NJ. Authorities allege that FEI recruited persons interested in investing in multi-family homes through BEI. These investors unknowingly assisted BEI in committing this fraud. In addition, Sweetland operated Boston Investment Marketing (BIM), another BEI recruitment wing in Canton, which would identify potential investors. BEI advertised itself as a real estate investment company, although BEI and its employees were not licensed real estate brokers. BEI advertised online and at real estate conventions in several states.

Authorities allege that Brown, Frankand Sweetland identified owners of multi-family properties who had properties for sale for long periods of time. They would approach the property owners and convince them to give BEI an “option” to sell these properties at prices below the current list price. BEI simultaneously recruited homebuyers to buy the same properties as “investments,” promising them that in return for their purchasing properties through BEI, BEI would renovate, rent and resell the properties. BEI told the homebuyers that their investments would help revitalize neighborhoods in the Greater Boston area. BEI acquired inflated property appraisals for the sellers’ properties. The appraisals were consistently well above the list prices that the sellers could not sell the homes for.

Authorities allege that BEI obtained false purchase and sale agreements between the homebuyers and sellers. Unbeknownst to the homebuyers and lenders, BEI arranged for the sellers to receive much less money for the property sales than the maximum amount of financing that BEI was able to fraudulently extract from the lenders in the homebuyers’ names. In the end, authorities allege, at the home sale closings, BEI would, unbeknownst to the homebuyers and lenders, pocket the difference, which was usually between $50,000 and $100,000 and sometimes as much as $150,000.

Investigators also discovered that Brown, Frankand Sweetland conspired with mortgage brokers Linda Defeoand Brian Arrington to submit loan applications to financial lending institutions with false information in order to secure 100% financing for the homebuyers’ purchases. Authorities believe that BEI, with Arrington’s assistance, inflated borrowers’ incomes and savings, misrepresented where and for how long the borrowers had been employed (if the borrowers were employed at all), and falsely stated that the borrowers intended to use the properties as primary residences instead of as investment properties (many of the borrowers lived out of state). BEI also allegedly deposited money into some of the homebuyers’ bank accounts to make it appear as if they qualified for mortgage loans. Several homebuyers acquired mortgage loans through Defeo and Arrington to buy several properties through BEI. In these instances Defeo and Arrington, in conspiracy with BEI, did not disclose the homebuyers’ new debts to the lenders thereby misrepresenting the extent of the homebuyers’ debts on their loan applications. Defeo and Arrington allegedly rushed the homebuyers through the loan application process and told them that they did not have to disclose all of their debts to the lenders.

BEI allegedly submitted the inflated property appraisals and false purchase and sale agreements to the lenders through Arrington and Defeo. Arrington and Defeo, on behalf of BEI, did not disclose to the lenders that BEI had an option to sell the properties at lower prices. In these agreements, the sellers agreed to receive far less for the sales of their properties than the amounts the financial institutions were lending to the borrowers to purchase the properties. Instead, on the homebuyers’ loan applications, Arrington and Defeo falsely claimed that there were true, contracted purchase and sale agreements between the homebuyers and sellers for the larger amount of money. The lenders relied on these misrepresentations submitted in the loan applications and other documents to approve loans for the homebuyers.

After the homebuyers purchased the properties, BEI intentionally did not fulfill the promises it made, including renovating and reselling the properties. The homebuyers and lenders were left with properties not worth the loans the borrowers obtained to purchase the properties. The homebuyers’ credit was ruined, and they were severely financially injured. Almost all of the homes were foreclosed at a great loss to the homebuyers and lenders.

The lenders required that the homebuyers bring cash, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars, to the real estate closings. Former attorney Bruce Namenson, in conspiracy with BEI, misrepresented on closing settlement statements that the home buyers brought cash to the closings, when he and BEI knew that the borrowers did not do so. Namenson allegedly, in conspiracy with BEI, sent a business associate to several states to obtain homebuyers’ signatures on documents critical to the real estate closings. Later, Namenson allegedly notarized the documents claiming that the homebuyers had signed the documents in Namenson’s presence in Massachusetts. In addition, the lenders required that Namenson purchase title insurance for the closings. Namenson represented to the lenders that he was using the borrowers’ money to do so. Authorities believe that Namenson did not purchase title insurance and retained the borrowers’ premiums for himself instead.

A Suffolk County Grand Jury returned indictments against all six defendants. Brown was arrested and was arraigned in South Boston District Court and subsequently released on $75,000 bail. Frank was arrested in New York and proceedings are underway to bring him back to Massachusetts. Defeo, Arringtonand Namenson have been summoned to appear in Suffolk Superior Court on January 6, 2010, when all defendants are expected to be arraigned. A warrant has been issued for Sweetland’s arrest, and authorities are actively searching for him and believe him to be in southern California.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Brendan O’Shea with the assistance of Investigator Scott Gisetto. Massachusetts State Police assigned to the Attorney General’s Office and the Attorney General’s Financial Investigations Division also assisted in the investigation.

admin

One response to Indictments Announced in Elaborate Mortgage Fraud Scheme

Josh Brown is as slimy as they get. I originated a mortgage for his in-laws. I was honest and smart enough when he tried to involve me in his “investments” to say no thank you. I had no idea of the specifics but you could smell a rat a mile away with this guy. How he ever duped anyone is amazing as he does not come off as that bright.

Legal Disclaimer. The information and notices contained on Mortgage Fraud Blog are intended to summarize recent developments in mortgage fraud cases and mortgage banking matters nationwide. The posts on this site are presented as general research and information and are expressly not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Much of the information on this site concerns allegations made in civil lawsuits and in criminal indictments. All persons are presumed innocent until convicted of a crime. Readers who have particular questions about mortgage banking, mortgage fraud matters or who believe they require legal counsel should seek the advice of an attorney. The creators, editors and sponsors of Mortgage Fraud Blog do not intend to create a confidential relationship or an attorney-client relationship by communication via or arising from this site.