I feel like I just watched a promo video for Minecraft 2. Which is not necessarily a bad thing but… none of this sounds all that original, more like going through the ropes to shove something out the door.

Haven't bothered to check the video - but I think it's pretty clear that they have a LOT of work to do in terms of overall design and gameplay structure - and I don't care what they say. If this is out before mid-late 2015, I'll eat my hat.

DArtagnan

Originally Posted by DArtagnan
Haven't bothered to check the video - but I think it's pretty clear that they have a LOT of work to do in terms of overall design and gameplay structure - and I don't care what they say. If this is out before mid-late 2015, I'll eat my hat.

I think you have the wrong impression of what EQNext Landmark is going to be. It won't release feature complete anyhow.

Originally Posted by DArtagnan
Haven't bothered to check the video - but I think it's pretty clear that they have a LOT of work to do in terms of overall design and gameplay structure - and I don't care what they say. If this is out before mid-late 2015, I'll eat my hat.

Way too early to start bitching, though.

If you haven't bothered to watch the content, then please don't bother us with your opinions of it.

People were bitching about it - and I assume they're talking about EQNext. I don't have a clue why they'd bitch about the sandbox editor thingy that gets released before the actual game - so I assume they were talking about the game itself.

If they were bitching about Landmark - then I'd have to ask what's wrong with an editor/sandbox test pre-release thingy being like Minecraft? Minecraft is essentially a multiplayer editor.