I don't think you will have a lesser experience in 2D, but I believe the majority opinion is that this is 3D done right. It's not used obnoxiously, if that makes any sense. I don't wanna get too into the movie, but I imagine it would be enjoyable either way.

I don't think you will have a lesser experience in 2D, but I believe the majority opinion is that this is 3D done right. It's not used obnoxiously, if that makes any sense. I don't wanna get too into the movie, but I imagine it would be enjoyable either way.

The friend that saw it said he thought the 3d was very environmental, rather than a gimmick. It enhanced the movie but wasn't in your face, similar to Avatar. Gave everything more depth, more of a feeling that you're part of the action.

The friend that saw it said he thought the 3d was very environmental, rather than a gimmick. It enhanced the movie but wasn't in your face, similar to Avatar. Gave everything more depth, more of a feeling that you're part of the action.

I don't think I've ever once considered whether or not to see a movie based on it's length.

First and foremost, am I interested in the movie at all. Then I look at the length. I have to be EXTREMELY interested to pay full movie theater prices for a 90 minute movie. I'm interested in this movie but not enough to be throwing 14 bucks per person at it.

I have no doubt this will be in the 2 buck theater here in about a month anyway. I can wait.

First and foremost, am I interested in the movie at all. Then I look at the length. I have to be EXTREMELY interested to pay full movie theater prices for a 90 minute movie. I'm interested in this movie but not enough to be throwing 14 bucks per person at it.

I have no doubt this will be in the 2 buck theater here in about a month anyway. I can wait.

90 minutes......but you will also get 20 minutes of preview trailers!

__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning:

Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down.

Just saw it. It is good, very intense. The 3d is not bad except for alot of little matte lines, and the fact that it is fake. It is nicely used, for what it is, but it is still fake. I loved the camera work outside of the 3d. The DP is one of my favorites for a reason.

It was an interesting experience, though I was a bit queasy when walking out of the theater, and the relentlessness of it grows a bit tiresome. I hit the limit just a moment before the thing was over.

The movie is ninety minutes for a reason. 5 minutes more and I would have shifted from enjoying it to hating it!

Scariest movie I've ever seen, maybe. See it in IMAX if you can. Holy shit, that was an intense experience. It is so impressive on a technical level too; I can't even wrap my head around how Cuaron filmed this.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano

Reaper16's taste in beer, music, and literature are unmatched on this message board.Posted via Mobile Device

Scariest movie I've ever seen, maybe. See it in IMAX if you can. Holy shit, that was an intense experience. It is so impressive on a technical level too; I can't even wrap my head around how Cuaron filmed this.

thats it im seeing it

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Sure-Oz could ****ing track anyone in the country via Twitter. Dude makes me scared to leave the house.