You too Heiwa! I wont bother trying to win the unwinnable though. Those that do are twerps

Incorrect! Not even twerps are that stupid.

Hm, twerps are twerps. And they are not very clever. None has won my Challenge - topic!!!!!

Are you a twerp then because you can't understand things that any "rocket scientist" would find easy. Things like:

atmospheric re-entry,

The Oberth effect or powered fly-by assist or

gravitational slingshot or unpowered gravity assist manoeuvre.

To name just a few.

But you might be able to offer these scientists some assistance. You have probably read that the "Pioneer Anomaly" has been solved but maybe you could solve the "Flyby Anomaly".

It has been found that some but not all spacecraft when utilising the unpowered gravity assist manoeuvre have had slightly more boost than expected. In one case this was as much as 13 mm/s extra velocity.

This has been called the "Flyby Anomaly" for obvious reasons and has these scientists looking for a solution. I and others, obviously, thought that it might be caused the Lense-Thirring Effect but apparently that does not explain it.

I immediately thought that one your undoubted self-claimed intelligence and expertise in rockets might have some ideas of this vexing issue.

You too Heiwa! I wont bother trying to win the unwinnable though. Those that do are twerps

Incorrect! Not even twerps are that stupid.

Hm, twerps are twerps. And they are not very clever. None has won my Challenge - topic!!!!!

Are you a twerp then because you can't understand things that any "rocket scientist" would find easy. Things like:

atmospheric re-entry,

The Oberth effect or powered fly-by assist or

gravitational slingshot or unpowered gravity assist manoeuvre.

To name just a few.

But you might be able to offer these scientists some assistance. You have probably read that the "Pioneer Anomaly" has been solved but maybe you could solve the "Flyby Anomaly".

It has been found that some but not all spacecraft when utilising the unpowered gravity assist manoeuvre have had slightly more boost than expected. In one case this was as much as 13 mm/s extra velocity.

This has been called the "Flyby Anomaly" for obvious reasons and has these scientists looking for a solution. I and others, obviously, thought that it might be caused the Lense-Thirring Effect but apparently that does not explain it.

I immediately thought that one your undoubted self-claimed intelligence and expertise in rockets might have some ideas of this vexing issue.

Well, to start with re-entries from space are not atmospheric. There is no atmosphere in space. It is vacuum. Nothing.

And flyby things!!! It is not easy to fly by things in the Universe. First you have to see the thing and check its speed and direction and then you have to adjust your speed and direction to enable a flyby. Actually it is not possible. It is another NASA space nonsense fraud.

To win Heiwas challenge is to not engage with it. To enter his challenge is to be a twerp

Nobody in their right mind thinks Heiwa's challenge is winnable or that a conspiritard like Heiwa can be convinced by facts but it's been educational coming up with answers.

You, of course, know everything and so can never learn anything more but:"I'm not young enough to know everything" (often attributed to Oscar Wilde but . . . . ) so I appreciate the chance to learn new things.

To win Heiwas challenge is to not engage with it. To enter his challenge is to be a twerp

Nobody in their right mind thinks Heiwa's challenge is winnable or that a conspiritard like Heiwa can be convinced by facts but it's been educational coming up with answers.

You, of course, know everything and so can never learn anything more but:"I'm not young enough to know everything" (often attributed to Oscar Wilde but . . . . ) so I appreciate the chance to learn new things.

Topic is my Challenge about human space travel. Reason why there is no winner is simple! Human space travel is not possible. Only one way robot trips are possible.Same with my four other Challenges about atomic bombs, ferries losing bow visors, NYC towers collapsing from top by gravity 911 and fusion. Reason why there are no winners is simple! Fake news cannot be proven!

To win Heiwas challenge is to not engage with it. To enter his challenge is to be a twerp

Nobody in their right mind thinks Heiwa's challenge is winnable or that a conspiritard like Heiwa can be convinced by facts but it's been educational coming up with answers.

You, of course, know everything and so can never learn anything more but:"I'm not young enough to know everything" (often attributed to Oscar Wilde but . . . . ) so I appreciate the chance to learn new things.

Topic is my Challenge about space travel. Reason why there is no winner is simple! Space travel is not possible.

I clearly show at my web site that you cannot carry the fuel with you for such a trip...

That's because you fail to understand that NASA doesn't use just one rocket for these trips. For the Apollo missions, NASA used 6 rockets for the trip. The Saturn V first, second and third stages, the service module, lunar module ascent and descent stages were all individual rockets that had their own fuel supplies. Each rocket only needed to carry enough fuel to carry out its specific part of the mission.

The launch mass of the Saturn V carrying the Apollo 11 was 2,970,000 kg and the total thrust at sea-level was 3,579,300 kg.force.The first stage burn time was 168 seconds so why could it "never could lift off the ground"?

If you deny that simple stuff there's not the slightest point attempting your scam challenge! Fake challenges cannot be won!