NYC Mayor de Blasio

By Liberal Anthropologist

I won’t post a lot about this given the nature of this blog, but I just had to say something. Could New York City residents be any dumber? Electing de Blasio is really going to hurt the city dramatically. I lived in the city for 12 years and spend about 20 to 30 percent of my time there today.

He is worse than Dinkins. That is hard to say. Dinkins was bad. What does the Mayor of NYC think is a top priority? Eliminating Horse drawn carriages so that his developer buddies can build on where the stables are. River views. Nice west side addresses. He doesn’t care about the horses. Period. And if he does, then he is clueless.

Rudy Guilliani was the best mayor NYC has had in my lifetime and probably they ever had. How they could go from him to soda banning Bloomberg to horse banning de Blasio is beyond me!

If you live in NYC, move now. If you own property there, sell now. he will do a lot of damage in a short time. I am glad I moved a long time ago.

Comments

The worst part of electing this Marxist will be that the liberal locust will swarm to new areas. In a pattern that continues to repeat itself, liberal jurisdictions engage in policy self-destruction by which they drive out the liberal locusts that reside there via high taxes and poor services.

They then see the job creating conservative areas and swarm in to devour it. But they’ve been indoctrinated by the liberal system and then try and inculcate the conservative culture with their same brain-dead policies that cause the swarm’s original demise in it’s native habitat.

Think Colorado or, closer to home, North Carolina or even closer to home Loudoun County. The liberal locusts just can’t consume enough.

And now I can add he just picked his health commissioner, who reaffirmed with his enthusiastic support that they will expand smoking bans, sugary soda bans, and introduce new banned unhealthy lifestyle choices.

There is only one way to describe liberals. They fascinated with controlling others bodies. Soon forced contraception unless you fill in a government eligibility for will be coming from them since the choice to have sex has a greater impact on all of us than soda drinking.

IV will support such forced contraception since not using condoms is a personal choice we all pay for with std treatments, healthcare costs, unwanted children, welfare, etc…

Of course IV like almost all liberals is intellectually inconsistent and will only go with fashion. It is OK to force us to wear helmets or buy insurance because of the impact on others, but not to require condoms by law.

Progressives have a bad name for a reason. They are regressive tyrants.

Liberal Anthropologist on The Failure of Obamacare Jimmy, You should engage as I am dealing with facts. Since most people have a similar opinion, if you have a different one, you should... – May 15, 12:17 AM

Too Conservative publishes and distributes articles and news items daily to its readers. Too Conservative presents contemporary political issues and opinions unbound by commercial ties. Unless otherwise noted opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Too Conservative or its staff.