The US Senate Intelligence Committee approved a bill Thursday which facilitates the sharing of information about cybersecurity threats between private companies and US government intelligence agencies. Critics fear it’s "a surveillance bill by another name."

The 14 — 1 vote in favor of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act was the last hurdle for the bill on the way to a full Senate vote. In 2014, another version of the legislation made it through the Intelligence committee but later stalled, as privacy and civil liberties advocates voiced concerns over what they saw as a lack of privacy protections for users whose information would be gathered.

"If information-sharing legislation does not include adequate privacy protections then that’s not a cybersecurity bill—it’s a surveillance bill by another name," wrote Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) — the one dissenting vote on the Committee — in a public statement. "It makes sense to encourage private firms to share information about cybersecurity threats. But this information sharing is only acceptable if there are strong protections for the privacy rights of law-abiding American citizens."

Those concerned about privacy are up against a rare area of bipartisan agreement however, as both sides of the aisle consider battling cyber security threats — like the one perpetrated against Sony Pictures in 2014 — to be a high priority.

Of particular concern among activists — who in the past have been successful in blocking other versions of information-sharing legislation — is that the bill obviates the need for a warrant as the government could go directly to a private company to acquire data.

In general, the legislation would make it much easier for the government to collect larger amounts of data which it could then pass on, for example, to the NSA for analysis. The misuse of personal data by the NSA has been of particular concern since the leaking of classified documents by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in 2013.

The bill would also allow for a certain amount of protection from liability for companies who comply with the government, leading civil liberties activists to question whether those companies would have much motivation to look out for their users' privacy rights.

“[The bill] would provide a blanket authorization for companies to monitor their users’ activities for purposes other than protecting their own networks, as they are currently allowed to do,” wrote Robyn Greene, of the Open Technology Institute, in a recent blog post.

When 2014's bill stalled, that was the fourth time in as many years that Congress had failed to pass cyber security legislation over objections of vociferous opponents. But the legislation — sometimes referred to a "Zombie" bill in its multiple evolving forms — keeps coming back.

Previous versions of the cybersecurity bill — like SOPA and PIPA — were more successful in marshalling opposition because the provisions were more threatening to large corporations like Google, since their anti-piracy stipulations could potentially be used to shut down websites and hurt business' bottom lines. With corporate players less concerned about users' privacy than they were about profits, there isn't as broad a coalition protesting the latest versions of the laws.

The strong — almost unanimous — support for the bill in the Senate Committee gives this bill a better chance of making it through the full Senate. It will then also have to pass the House of Representatives if President Obama is to sign it into law.

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.