I must create a system, or be enslaved by another man's. I will not reason and compare: my business is to create.

- William Blake

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Single Digit Weapons

In the original D&D
(the boxed set from 1974), all weapons caused 1d6 damage. Variable
weapon damage (with d4s, d8s, etc) was introduced by Greyhawk and has
been widely adopted since then, not only by all editions of D&D
since, but also by different systems such as Call of Cthulhu and
Savage Worlds. Nowadays, most RPGs differentiate weapons by the
damage they cause, even when there are few mechanical differences
otherwise.

Using the same damage
for all weapons might work fine, but there are some caveats. If only
cost and weight vary by weapon, adventures would always use the
cheapest, lightest weapon they can find, which is a bit odd. But the
same will happen in other systems where weapons have a single
variable that is more important than others. For example, when cost
becomes unimportant in B/X, everybody will use the weapon with the
greater damage, unless weapons you use other traits for weapons, such
as reach, speed, handedness, proficiency, effectiveness against armor
and shield, etc.

To account for this,
AD&D has a complex weapon system involving lots of special rules,
exceptions and tables – a system which was completely abandoned not
only in subsequent editions but also ignored by many AD&D players
at the time and even disowned by Gary Gygax himself (“Actually,
yes, as I wanted to remove some things from the AD&D
rules--weapon speed factors, weapon vs. armor” - http://greyhawkgrognard.blogspot.com.br/2009/02/ad-second-edition.html)

To be honest, I love
the idea of weapons with different weight, damage, speed, reach, etc.
While I dislike the fact that this often comes at the cost of
simplicity, dread using tables to find the numbers I
need, and I can see the argument for D&D combat being too
abstract to worry about such things, I enjoy this little differences
anyway. And detail should be where your heart is, after all.

In my own game (Days of
the Damned), I tried to keep weapons diverse but simple. They might
have many different traits (damage bonus, speed, weight and cost,
etc.), but they are often the same number, so you don’t need to
check attack tables or long lists of traits for your weapon.

The system below is an adaptation to OD&D and BD&D, using only the d6, as the original game intended. The same system can be adapted to different systems that use the a similar rationale for weapons, such as Savage Worlds.

Great (+2) weapons are
two-handed weapons such as dopplehanders, great-axes, and so on.

Obviously, medium
weapons deal 1d6 damage, tiny weapons 1d6-2 (minimum 1), and great weapons 1d6+2.
But that’s not all they do - this numbers are also used for all
other purposes, depending if the size and weight of the weapon will
help or hinder you.

Here are some examples:

Speed: Bigger weapons
get +2 initiative bonus (because of reach) until the wielder is hit
for the first time; after that, smaller weapons get the bonus
(because they are lighter and faster). In confined spaces, smaller
weapons always get a +2 bonus, and great weapons a -2 penalty. This
assumes initiative means something in your game; if this isn’t the
case, apply the bonus to hit, instead, or use some formula to control
reach (attacks from second rank, opportunity attacks, etc.).

Backstab and grapple:
Likewise, while grappling or attacking by surprise, all weapons deal
1d6 damage, but smaller weapons get a bonus to hit, while bigger
weapons get a penalty. The same happens if you’re trying to conceal
or smuggle a weapon.

Big creatures: Great
weapons get a damage bonus against big creatures, tiny weapons get a
penalty. I would limit this to +1/-1; you still wouldn’t want to
hit a dragon with your knife.

Critical hits: If you
use any rule for critical hits, they should add 1d6 instead of double
damage, so that even a knife can be deadly sometimes, especially with
a well-placed blow.

Armor: this is a
little trickier. If you want “weapon vs.
armor” to matter, there are multiple ways you can go about it. For example, you can divide armors in three groups: light/unarmored,
medium/shield and heavy. Depending on the weapon, it gets a +1 bonus
to hit light/unarmored and -1 penalty to hit heavy armor, or vice
versa. Some weapons, like maces, may get a +1 penalty to hit
medium/shield, instead, while other have no bonuses or penalties at
all or have only bonuses (see below).

Price and weight: In
general, bigger weapons are heavier and more expensive (Days of the
Damned uses 2 kilos for medium weapons, 4 kilos for great weapons,
and half a kilo for tiny weapons, price $10 per kilo), but a little
bit better overall.

Other distinctions,
good or bad, can be added on top of that, or you can remove the ones
you don’t like – just try to keep some balance between heavier
and lighter weapons. The important thing is that not all players need
to use these rules, even if some of them do. If a player is looking for
something simple, 1d6 damage and no bonuses or penalties will do.

Besides, you don’t
have to use all traits in your game – just choose some traits that
make big weapons better in some circumstances and worse in others. I
would still give a small edge to big weapons because they are heavier
and more expensive.

I usually let players
add two traits to any weapon: reach, thrown, double damage on a
charge, parry, grapple, shield-breaker, improvised, bonus against armor, etc. Extra damage is
+1 per trait (maximum 1d6+3), other traits are usually +2 (maximum
+4). A pike (great weapon) could have damage 1d6+2, Reach +4 (and
thus -4 in tight spaces) and charge, for example. If you do the same,
players who want simple weapons can pick a 1d6+2 medium sword (with
no other bonuses or penalties), a 1d6 medium spear that can be thrown
and attack form the second rank, or a 1d6 medium mace that ignores
shields and can be thrown. This is what it looks like:

Spear (0): reach, charge.

Sword (0): 1d6+1 damage, parry.

Great maul (+2): 1d6+3 damage, +1 against medium/shield or heavier.

You can add a few
negative traits too (expensive, heavy, etc.) to create more
combinations, although one might be careful to avoid abuse (and
headaches).

You notice there are no
1d6+1 or 1d6-1 weapons. You can use this numbers for bucklers, main
gauches and other weapons that can be used with the offhand (1d6-1)
and as bastard swords and heavy spears that can be used with one or
two hands (size +1, but causes only 1d6 damage if used with one hands).

In any case, you should
avoid adding multiple modifiers to the same things. Use one modifier
for initiative, one modifier for damage, one for attack rolls, etc. I
also ignore differences in reach unless they are greater than +1. So,
no reach bonus for the great sword against the bastard sword. This
makes things a lot simpler.

But what about the other dice? Here is where it gets interesting: use them for magical weapons. An 1d8 sword will feel more
“magical” if you physically pick a different dice than everybody
else is using, even though the effect is mathematically similar to
1d6+1 (you still might add a bonus to BAB when using a magical sword, but you don't have to). What about an 1d8 sword, 1d10 versus undead? This feels really
cool, especially if the improved damage extends to crits (which I do). You can use your d7s if you want something a bit more exotic, of course. And you can keep the "common" modifiers on top of it (a magical dagger deals 1d8-2 damage, for example).

About Me

I write about role-playing games, as well as other tabletop games, video-games, movies and pop culture in general, under the name Eric Diaz. That's about it for the time being. You can reach me in G+ or at ericdiazdotd@gmail.com (although I don't check my mail too often).