So far in Western Washington it's been a tempest in a teapot, only a light dust of snow last night, melting away right now. Our heat is off and I didn't even do a fire last night, the house is still warm from the fire 2 nights ago

So far in Western Washington it's been a tempest in a teapot, only a light dust of snow last night, melting away right now. Our heat is off and I didn't even do a fire last night, the house is still warm from the fire 2 nights ago

So far in Western Washington it's been a tempest in a teapot, only a light dust of snow last night, melting away right now. Our heat is off and I didn't even do a fire last night, the house is still warm from the fire 2 nights ago

Perhaps in your area. According to this, northern parts of Puget Sound got as much as 4-5 inches of snow and many streets are icy:

London has the coldest December in thirty years.
At the same time the freaks are demonstrating at the airport to stop flights to slow down “Global Warming”.

I'd rather be out playing in the uncommon snow with my kids, but the millionth SF repetition of this hypersimplistic argument demands some moderation and further reduction of my popularity. I agree that the jury is still out on global warming, at least considering the number and complexity of sub-issues debated. But I would hope that same complexity, obvious in any discussion of weather and climate and their zillion counter-intuitive variables, to restrain us from trumpeting this knee-jerk Limbaugh-esque pollyannaism so predictably and in such thoughtless lockstep with the "right wing" stereotype projected of us by our enemies.

There are compelling arguments to be made against the position represented by Al Gore, who is thanking his lucky stars that he lost the 2000 election, as his default career path has made him far more popular and noble in the eyes of the herd. Otherwise, he'd have been obeying Jewish orders to bomb Baghdag into the stone age just as GWB did. However, the fact that temperate regions are experiencing unusual low temperatures in recent years is _NOT_ one of these arguments, but ironically counts against them. Even the most cursory research into the debate should make that obvious. Despite (or possibly, in connection with) the unusual climate extremes in the northern areas normally moderated by consistent warm ocean currents (ie, London and Seattle, both of which are much farther north than historically winter-frozen areas of the US midwest), the average global temperature continues to increase. That is not debated.

If you guys don't understand the important distinction between uniform and average difference/change, I'd hate you to represent our position in any public discussion of racial differences.

A far more important point, however, is that the crucial subject of environment protection is MOOT relative to the subject of the war between Jews and European man. If we lose the latter, there can be no solution to the former. Humanity cannot survive Aryan technology without management by the genius that spawned it. To illustrate with a look into the past, there would be no issue of increasing the concentration of greenhouse gasses beyond their high over the last million years of 280 parts per million by volume to 1200 ppmv in the next 80 years if our people had heeded the dire warnings early 20th century fascist leaders issued against capitalist (outsourcing) transfer of Aryan technology to the third world.