The email is not only in dispute, it is proven to be modified to the extent that it is nothing but a phoney.

The hoaxer crew posted an email that purported to prove the bucket hat Adam Lanza wore in his attack on Sandy Hook Hoax Elementary School was made after 2013. She alleged she obtained this information from an email from Flexfit that stated the sweatband in the hat was the new sweatband and was not produced until 2013.

The Hoaxers ran with the story without doing a single bit of internet research or fact checking. Soon, Flexfit's Vice President declared in the Hoaxer email was manipulated by the hoaxers, prior to posting it and changing what the employee had said.

Caught red-handed!

The Vice President's email further went on to detail that the new Flexfit sweatband, a band that did not go into production until a "running change in 2014". The one shown in Lanza's photo was manufactured between 2005-2013, and was the old style. A photo of the new headband was provided by Flexfit's VP and makes clear the difference.

Hello Bridget, Sorry for the delay in responding… I have reached
out to my Production Team here and in NY.. And I contacted my factory
overseas….to see if I could get some answers regarding: The production
cycle – and being able to identify product by label etc… So it has taken
some time to go to the appropriate people who might help

In identifying the timeline as to when this was made, who purchased the hat and when we changed our labeling.

Unfortunately – I cannot give you a ‘definitive’ answer, although I
can give you a really good idea and bet that I am 98% correct. I would
just hate to find out that it could be wrong, so please keep that in
mind.

The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to
blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped
us in our search. Here are the areas of issue:

1. I cannot see if there is a Flexfit ‘Flag’ label (This specific
label was only produced and sold on the east coast for a period of time.
I can speculate that it was during this time based on the style of the
hat, because I have been working here for well over 20 years, but it is
not definitive.) This is on the brim, where the crown meets the brim top
side.

2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of
production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any
that we have produced, which is odd because I have contacted our
overseas production department as well, and they also do not use those
numbers.

We produce blank inventory such as the bucket cap – and they are
shipped to 2 different distribution centers. One on the east coast and
another on the west coast…so stock levels are sold and replenished
regularly, but we do keep track of the numbers on the hats for inventory
and identifying sales.

This style is carried over from year to year with little to no
change –as it is a staple item. So we need to keep it consistent as
possible for our customers/distributors who purchase it yearly, but I do
recognize that this hat was during a year we had been making changes by
the lot.

3. We have done 5 updates to this cap within the last 20 years that I have been with the company.

a.) We removed the flag label from the brim – (I mentioned above)
approx. 3 years ago. with that being said, that would have been in 2011.
This photo was taken in 2012. That does not mean that this person would
have not kept on to the hat after the year we removed that label. I
would assume most people keep their hats years after their original
purchase.

But we would have continued to sell through any product still in
the warehouse until it was sold out – so it could have carried over
longer than when we actually stopped producing it with the label. I know
that they stopped selling this item on the east coast and west coast
both around the end of 2012. (not sure on the exact month and day).

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to
sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However
the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is
odd given the information you have given me.

There is an ‘identifying marker’ on this item I can see from the
photo you have given – that can tell us when it was made and where it
was purchased…However I am still looking into the number listed on the
hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find
out the purchaser from this number.)

I’m sorry I could not be of more help right now – if you have any
further questions please let me know. Until then I will continue to look
into this and get back with you as my time allows. Sorry for the
delayed response.

I wish you luck with what you’re looking for. I know it meant a lot to you.

Thank you, Best Regards, Leslie

There are several problems with Norris' weak attempt at passing off this fake email.

When the screen shots were posted of the emails she allegedly exchanged, they appeared fake.

All of the emails bear the familiar style formatting known of current Gmail:

"One of these things is not like the other, can you tell me which one it is?"

The fabric percentages are the only numbers in the photo indicating fraud because the writer is talking about numbers that quite simply, do not exist. The fabric numbers have not changed since at least 2009, as far as Wayback Machine goes.

Fraud #4 New Sweatband

From alleged email from Flexfit:

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to
sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However
the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is
odd given the information you have given me.

According to the VicePresident of Flexfit and according to the website and current inventory listings on numerous websites (include even ebay), the new Flexfit headband is currently being sold and looks quiet different than the one in the crime scene photograph. From Flexfit's website, which matches the email from the Vice President:

One can easily tell the new flexfit sweatband does not have the big writing "Flexfit" on it.

However I am still looking into the number listed on the
hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find
out the purchaser from this number.)

Felxtfit? Anyway... WHAT NUMBERS?

There are NO NUMBERS to identify this hat in the photo.

Fraud #6 This isn't the sweatband we are looking for

Attempting Jedi mind tricks after being caught red handed in multiple lies, The hoaxers deftly switch gears because the distinctive new sweatband could never be confused with the old sweatband. To attempt to weasel out of the lies they dug themselves, they are pushing a new and improved slant:

"The band itself is not what we are looking for. It could be the smallest thing like stitch, color, materiel used. etc

The band is not what we are looking for?

But didn't your alleged email clearly state:

We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to
sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However
the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me.

Nice attempt to change gears.

PATENTS:

The new sweatband patent design was filed by Yupoong August 20,2013. Click Here
A list of all Yupoon patents: Click Here

The evidence of Hoaxer scheme is overwhelming. In fact, there is not a shred of evidence to back up hoaxer claims. We must "take their word for it" and must do so in the face of a mountain of contradictory evidence, a statement by the Vice President of the company, and archived historical web data.

The conspiracy theorist groups use their fabricated 'evidence' to raise funds.

This time, Sandy Hook Hoaxers are claiming that the hat worn by Adam Lanza and photographed in the final report could not have been worn in 2012 because it has the "new Flexfit band" that was manufactured in 2013.

Unfortunately for the dishonest Sandy Hook Hoaxers, Flexfit did not shy away from providing this writer with the facts. The facts prove fraud.

"...our employee’s original email was modified and manipulated before it was put on the website you provided me. Thus, it was not 100% accurate information at all. "

The website I showed him? None other than the Duke Reichert blog!

Thus, Sandy Hook Hoax was caught red handed manipulating emails to suit their purpose; and their purpose is to raise money!

Mr. Yang went on to provide samples of the new Headband that went into production in 2014, and the samples make it clear that Sandy Hook Hoax's scheme is transparent:

"For your reference, the below are the 2 different versions of same bucket hats that we are selling. We have made the inner sweatband changes which took place in 2014. Therefore, the sweatband with “Flexfit” legible ones were produced between 2005, when we launched the product line until 2014 when we made the running change."

Flexfit's original bucket hat manufactured 2005-2014:

Flexfits new band, launched in 2014, and the obvious glaring difference:

One can easily observe that Flexfit abandoned the big "FLEXFIT" writing with their new sweatband. There is no reasonable way a Flexfit employee would be unable to tell the difference between the two versions of the sweatband, there can be no mistaking the two styles, and there is no doubt Erik Pearson and Tony Mead's Sandy Hook Hoax are again proven to be pathetic fraud!

Bridget: Hello *******,Sorry for the delay in responding…I have reached out to my Production Team here and in NY..And I contacted my factory overseas….to see if I could get some answers regarding:

The production cycle – and being able to identify product by label etc…So it has taken some time to go to the appropriate people who might helpIn identifying the timeline as to when this was made, who purchased the hat and when we changed our labeling.

Unfortunately – I cannot give you a 'definitive' answer, although I can give you a really good idea and bet that I am 98% correct. I would just hate to find out that it could be wrong, so please keep that in mind.

The only photo given – is limited in view, however I am able to blow the photo up and found more markings and numbers that have helped us in our search.Here are the areas of issue:1. I cannot see if there is a Flexfit 'Flag' label (This specific label was only produced and sold on the east coast for a period of time. I can speculate that it was during this time based on the style of the hat, because I have been working here for well over 20 years, but it is not definitive.) This is on the brim, where the crown meets the brim top side.2. Our inside label has identifying markers as to season/year of production, however the numbers on this hat do not seem to match any that we have produced, which is odd because I have contacted our overseas production department as well, and they also do not use those numbers.

We produce blank inventory such as the bucket cap – and they are shipped to 2 different distribution centers. One on the east coast and another on the west coast…so stock levels are sold and replenished regularly, but we do keep track of the numbers on the hats for inventory and identifying sales.

This style is carried over from year to year with little to no change –as it is a staple item. So we need to keep it consistent as possible for our customers/distributors who purchase it yearly, but I do recognize that this hat was during a year we had been making changes by the lot.

My California distribution center alone - receives on an average 5 to 7… 40 foot containers of various cap styles weekly.3. We have done 5 updates to this cap within the last 20 years that I have been with the company.

a.) We removed the flag label from the brim – (I mentioned above) approx. 3 years ago. with that being said, that would have been in 2011. This photo was taken in 2012 [sic. Allegedly]. That does not mean that this person would have not kept on to the hat after the year we removed that label. I would assume most people keep their hats years after their original purchase.But we would have continued to sell through any product still in the warehouse until it was sold out – so it could have carried over longer than when we actually stopped producing it with the label. I know that they stopped selling this item on the east coast and west coast both around the end of 2012. (not sure on the exact month and day).

b.) We updated the sweat band inside in 2013….but we continued to sell through the previous sweat band until stock levels depleted…However the new sweat band is pictured in this photo you have sent me. This is odd given the information you have given me.

There is an 'identifying marker' on this item I can see from the photo you have given - that can tell us when it was made and where it was purchased…However I am still looking into the number listed on the hat, trying to find out who made it (if it was even Felxtfit and find out the purchaser from this number.)

I’m sorry I could not be of more help right now – if you have any further questions please let me know. Until then I will continue to look into this and get back with you as my time allows. Sorry for the delayed response.I wish you luck with what you’re looking for. I know it meant a lot to you.Thank you,Best Regards, L

Complete email from Flexfit President Brian Yang refuting the hoaxers:

*both photos moved to page 1 of email

Evidence has been obtained that links Sandy Hook Hoax's to direct complicity in creating this fraudulent evidence.

Saturday, August 16, 2014

New information has been released by Lenny Pozner clearing up a few 'nagging' issues.

The question was, if Noah Pozner did not receive a full autopsy, why did the report state they received "the autopsy reports for the twenty-six victims"?

For the answer, Lenny Pozner went straight to the source, Dr. Gill of the State of Connecticut Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME). Dr. Gill was the author of the letter that was in the final report. Dr. Gill also gave permission to publish this clarification.

The Pozner's had requested no autopsy be performed on Noah for religious reasons. This request was granted and only an external examination was performed by OCME. Lenny Ponzer previously released Noah Ponzer's Postmortem examination here and the Death Certificate (below) affirms that no autopsy was performed.

Monday, August 4, 2014

Sandy Hook Hoax groups are conspiracy theorists that believe the Sandy Hook tragedy is part of a grand conspiracy to take guns.

Recently they received posts by a candidate for Connecticut State Legislature, James McGovern.

Posting side by side a photo made to appear as an undead child, holding her dirty fingers to her lips, a grotesque mock of the first graders who were murdered December 14, 2012, is Connecticut Candidate for State Representative, James McGovern.

Here is James McGovern inspiring Sandy Hook Hoaxers:

Why are you posting there? Why are you inciting, inspiring, and aiding these people?

A few sample posts by Mr. McGovern's new friends:

No children died Mr. McGovern?

Tell that to the families in Newtown and the surrounding communities that are still trying to come to grips with what happened.. Tell that to the police officers and first responders. Tell that to the children who survived.

9/11, Sandy Hook, and Boston Bombing... Are you you a complete tin-foil hat wearing wack job Mr. McGovern? Connecticut voters have a right to know.

After posting on Sandy Hook Hoax, James McGovern sought out another Sandy Hook Hoax site on the same exact day. This site was Wolfgang Halbig's face book page (now closed) - Sandy Hook Justice.

Are you comfortable with your friends in that post?

I could go on, but to what end? You know exactly where you were posting and who you were posting with, didn't you James McGovern?

I was disgusted by your post.

And I confronted you.

I gave you the information. You could have distanced yourself from them, but you didn't. You stood firm!

Oh, you don't have an opinion? You don't have an opinion of out of state conspiracy theorists that stalk Connecticut residents, seek to dig up graves, seek the identities of minor children in Newtown, and make a mockery of a tragedy where your state's teachers and first graders were slaughtered, yet you go there and try to make new friends and inspire them about guns?

Well, that is your right. But I sure have an opinion about that. We don't need people like you in government, at all. That's my opinion.

We need people with good judgement and sound
discretion. You don't pick your friends very well, Mr. McGovern. You
exhibited horrible judgement.

Apparently, you have taken your motto to heart. Hopefully Connecticut residents expect more and are disappointed in you.