On 1/03/2013 nmonteith wrote:>Kuu has access - he is just having IT issues I think.

Neil has assured me that I still have access rights to the Safer Cliffs Australia pages and I happily accept his word.

It could well be an IT problem as he suggests because when I attempt to access that area using the link on the Chockstone Home Page I get the following Bigpond response:
"Sorry! We could not find www.safercliffs.org"

It was only after Macizza posted he'd lost access that I checked to see if I was similarly affected.

Thanks for the quick answer (to Kuu's question) . . .
I have received no real response - Does that imply that I don't have access?
The forum link simply denies me access - So am I 'just having IT issues'? . . .

On 1/03/2013 Macciza wrote:>Thanks for the quick answer (to Kuu's question) . . .>I have received no real response - Does that imply that I don't have access?>The link simply denies me access - So am I 'just having IT issues'? .>. .>
Noticed that and wondered about it too...

On 1/03/2013 nmonteith wrote:>The Safer Coiffs website is offline (someone forget to pay the bills).>Try clicking on the actual forums link to the safer cliffs section instead.>That should work fine for you Kuu.

Thanks for that Neil - I was going to point out to Kuu that the frontpage link does not work . . .
And that he probably does still have access to the Forums as you pointed out earlier . ..
Glad we could get that sorted out for Kuu . . .
Thanks a lot . . .

On 1/03/2013 hotgemini wrote:>On 1/03/2013 Macciza wrote:>>Glad we could get that sorted out for Kuu . . .>>Thanks a lot . . .>>I'm trying to find a reference, but someone somewhere once said "The ultimate>freedom is the being free to do what you want and in turn being free to>live with the consequences">>-Adam.

?
I might be missing something here, but are you suggesting that perhaps because M and nm may have differing ideologies when it comes to acceptable route bolting, that a possible consequence is exclusion from presenting the differing points of view on SC's?
If that is the case, then SC's is the poorer for it, ... ~> and by default, I can see the popularity of DC's increasing!

On 1/03/2013 One Day Hero wrote:>It's a shame that you can't participate any more Kuu, seeing as the other>big initiative of Safer Cliffs (once Shai Halud has been glued together)>is to bulldoze Linfield. You know, too high for bouldering, too short for>routes.......safest solution is to just get rid of the stupid little thing>;)

ODH, you are a Naughty Person, as everyone on Chockstone knows.

However, the bulldozing you suggest may be a problem given that Ku-ring-gai Council has declared Lindfield Rocks (and Wahroonga Rocks) a Designated Climbing (& Abseiling) Area.

If you've just registered you probably have to wait for Neil to do whatever he does. I just checked the Safer Cliffs site (www.safercliffs.org) and it is certainly accessible now. So currently no technical issues.
Neil, is there any reason why macciza can't access the safer cliffs forum. Given that he's hardly an anonymous user and the rationale for it being for registered members only is to make sure we know who is accessing and commenting, there hardly seems any justification for him no longer having access.
I may not share his opinions always but he certainly challenges my thinking. And as they say, I'd rather have him on the inside of the tent...