Here's What A High School English Teacher Thought Of 'The Great Gatsby'

Before Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby adaptation hit
theaters this weekend, we wondered
whether—through all the gauze, confetti, Jay-Z,
and 3D—this was actually going to be a film that approached the
book the way our high school English teachers did: with a lot of
talk about Fitzgerald's use of symbolism.

You know, how the green light symbolizes the American Dream and
the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg are the eyes of God.

Turns out, there
was a lot of all that. So we decided, for a second watching,
to take an actual high school English teacher as our movie date.
Kyle Mullins teaches ninth and twelfth grade at Regis High
School, a well-regarded Catholic school for boys in New York
City.

Though he doesn't currently teach Gatsby—Regis includes the
book in its sophomore curriculum—he is something of
a Gatsby scholar: Mullins taught the book to
undergraduates when he was a grad student at Boston College, and
presented a conference paper exploring "queer transmission and
sexuality" in the book.

Though it was hard to tell in the darkened theater—and through
two layers of glasses—we noticed him giggle a couple of times.
(Once when a party guest marvels of Gatsby: "He's certainly
richer than God.") Afterwards we ducked into a Barnes & Noble
to quiz him about his thoughts.

This Is Actually a Pretty Good High
School Gatsby...

To be sure, The Great Gatsby movie does not hide from
its source material's most famous passages: Fitzgerald's words
are literally printed on the screen, and a late montage is
something like a book report in 3D.

And while Mullins had some problems with the adaptation, he
actually thought that Luhrmann did a nice job with the aspects of
the book taught in actual English classes.

"As an interpretation I think he really nailed the high school
angle of it," Mullins told us, as we sat, appropriately, in the
bookstore's fiction section. "The symbolism was really overt. It
bothered me being someone who studied it more seriously to see it
be so blunt. Especially that scene at the end when Gatsby
literally says, 'I was so empty inside,' and the degree to which
it makes it so clear that he was doing this all for Daisy. It
just lacks subtlety, I guess, but that's the way we teach it to
sophomores in high school."

...Except When It Wasn't

There were elements of certain scenes that got very much lost in
the transition from book to screen.

Most notably: In the scene where Nick and Gatsby pass the car of
African Americans partying on a bridge, Mullins wished that
Luhrmann had included the moment in the book when, importantly, a
hearse passes them first.

"To cut the hearse out of that really simplifies the fact that
African Americans are in that scene," he said. Also, the
character of Jordan Baker, he said, was "very
underutilized."

The Framing Device Is 'Kind of Unfair'

Mullins really wasn't keen on how Luhrmann and his collaborator
Craig Pearce had Nick narrating and writing the story from a
sanitarium. "I really didn't like it," Mullins said.

But he tried to make sense of Luhrmann's intentions: "I'm already
kind of rationalizing it in the sense that he wants to be very
clear that Nick is not a reliable narrator. Especially in showing
the chart [with Nick's symptoms], it's not just that he's
alcoholic but he's prone to fits of rage and an insomniac. So
it's really raising questions about his mental stability, in a
way that I think is kind of unfair. We don't quite get that from
the novel."

Mullins added that Luhrmann's use of mist and snow in those
scenes made him wonder whether Luhrmann was implying that the
whole story was just borne out of Nick's imagination. Later,
however, Mullins, remarked that he "loved" the moment of Nick
looking out the window and seeing himself.

Punctuation Problems!

Luhrmann's use of text on screen can seem cheesy, but Mullins
focused on something else: he got the punctuation wrong. "It
doesn't preserve the punctuation," he said.

Take the famous last scene, for example. Mullins explained that
the film left out the double em-dash in the final lines of the
book. "You lose so much complexity there," he said.

3D Actually Makes Sense

While the 3D certainly makes the visual elements of the film look
vibrant, Mullins had an academic perspective on it.

"It draws us in in a very intentional way," he said, and that
actually mirrors the text. "In that last paragraph the way that
Nick switches into that first person plural. In the end we're
implicated in it and in the film we're implicated in the entire
thing."

Would He Show It To High School Students?

Yes! "Definitely," Mullins said. "I think after having read the
book it really opens up a great conversation with what's lost
when you are changing mediums and what's gained."

What's gained? "You get the music. Even though this isn't jazz
that Fitzgerald's writing about, you get the sense of how the
music is infused in a lot of those scenes. You get a sense of
what those parties are like."

He said the kids are probably "imagining a rave when they read
that now." Mullins even gave us what is essentially an essay
prompt about the final scene: "How is this different when you
read it? What emotion does that conjure up when you're reading it
and how does that change when you're seeing it simultaneously
represented on the screen and narrated."

Yes, You Can See the Movie Without Having Read the Book
(Sort of)

Mullins told us that he asked students in his ninth grade
class—which hasn't had Gatsby in their curriculum
yet—whether they were going to see the movie, and many of them
said yes.

So what does a kid get from the movie without having read the
book?

While obviously he wants kids to read the book, he explained, "if
they are going to just go see the movie, and they are never going
to pick up the book, I think they are getting a pretty good
representation of it. I really do. I think Luhrmann really does
do justice to what Fitzgerald intended with the story."