*rework*

When it comes to the topic of media, most of us will readily agree that journalists are held backby certain restraints such as pandering, biases, and the ever changing public mood especially intimes of war. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the question of is this a good orbad thing. Whereas some are convinced that these obstacles have not gone far enough, othersmaintain that the cost is our objectivity in favor of bias and subjectivity.

Especially in times of war more in depth

Provide biases for general public

Commercial Keep the stories moving (commercial)---Gladstone Keep the public interested in the result of the war effort May be used as propaganda to create hatred of opposer Hate media---Hoffman Call to action

Bad news Propaganda fuel Insite hate Call to action Status quo Propaganda can fuel dislike of change/ potential change if effort is lost Anti war vs anti civil change More effective if fighting in home territory Call to action Access

Visual Images to make situation real for the public Propaganda fuel Emotional appeal Call to action Narrative Personal stories Propaganda fuel Make real the situation on a humanistic/personal level Call to action Fairness Equal time to alternative action