the absurdity was already apparent to everyone. I was asked whether there
was an ulterior meaning and I said there was none. the 'absurdity' does not
constitute a punchline.
so sorry, I wasn't wrong this time. keep fishing.

I wouldn't want to, because anons are ******* retarded, not excluding myself on this one, because really, what do I gain from racking down on just another unintelligent funnyjunker.

Listen to me now you stupid **** , if you're tired of explaining jokes, say so and be done with it, but stop explaining it with this arrogant attitude of yours, because people think they can ask you for explanation of a joke, which they SHOULD be able to, but instead get thumbed down and called a faggot by you. You're very clearly not smart enough for being this arrogant.

I've in the past explained to you how there is no one joke that is worth explaining more than the next so there is no reason for you to be this arrogant, so just delete your account and get over it if you're tired of being jokexplain.

I'm not tired of explaining jokes, and I've never thumbed down people who asked.
the fact that they get thumbed down is not my responsibility.
and I call people faggots when they spam mention me, because they are faggots.

"The fact that they get thumbed down is not my responsibility. " It is ENTIRELY your responsiblity, because a single post explaining why people who don't get the joke doesn't deserve to get thumbed down would probably stop a lot of it.

"and I call people ******* when they spam mention me, because they are ******* ."

Hey, cuntface, you do realize I just browsed through your list of comments to find one of the several wrongly explained jokes you have out there? I know for a fact from reading these that most of your flaming is completely unprovoked.

You back from your hissy fit? Perhaps now you'll start trying to pull your head out of your ass, and see that you being this arrogant serves no purpose, perhaps even evolve to understand what jokes are in a context-less manner, though that seems like a long shot.

Perhaps you've not been looking up a dictionary, but let me break it down for you, the many ways in which you are wrong.

"the absurdity was already apparent to everyone." This is an assumption, and assumptions will do you no good, you illiterate **** .

"I was asked whether there was an ulterior meaning and I said there was none." You were not. You were told that someone was confused, as would be expected for someone who doesn't get this particular type of joke. The correct and NOT arrogant thing to do here was to explain that the picture is just supposed to be asburd, and if they find it funny, they simply don't find the picture funny.

"the 'absurdity' does not constitute a punchline. " It is exactly what constitutes not only a punchline, but in this case the punchline.

Wrong. It's because dogs can only see in black and white and because colour was invented around the late 60's/early 70's, they can only see images between 1870 and 1969. Obviously, the two world wars are the most promanant images so the dog is often presented with german bombers upon gazing outside of it's house.