You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Ti dominant
Not very risk-taking or explorative because Ti cautions against this. I end up feeling like I don't get out enough and experience life because I'm always sitting quietly thinking about ideas or even new things to try, but rarely actually do these things. I think I'll read a book about hiking in Alaska and consider planning a trip there.

Ne dominant
I know what will happen, because I tried that already! I really need to be more careful and consider the logical consequences of my exploration of all possibilities. Maybe I should keep my mouth shut and think about things more before I say anything too! Sitting around just thinking about things is boring, and I don't like to focus on one thing for very long anyway! That Alaskan hiking trip last week was fun! Next month, I want to go to the jungles of South America!

Describing the two types behaviorally is exactly the right way to distinguish them. Between a day and a week of real-life observation and interaction with an ENTP and an INTP are all that's necessary to figure out which is which.

Describing the two types behaviorally is exactly the right way to distinguish them. Between a day and a week of real-life observation and interaction with an ENTP and an INTP are all that's necessary to figure out which is which.

So if this were in fact the case, which I actually agree with if the person was either one of the two, wouldn't it then be odd if a person didn't know if they happened to be one or the other?!?!

My point is , is that perhaps, in this case, they'd be, or are neither.

`
'Cause you can't handle me...

"A lie is a lie even if everyone believes it. The truth is the truth even if nobody believes it." - David Stevens

There is no in between. MBTI can grasp any personality right. Every further consideration would implicit that there is a need for a refined system, because the MBTI is limited in its associations. And to pinpoint out single things as not fitting in MBTI would simply be unfair confronting the whole thing