Haaretz’s Cold Hierarchy of Importance

Amos Schocken, Haaretz’s publisher, explains why the paper gave more prominence to the Japanese tsunami than to the Fogel family massacre, which occurred on the same day.

“The role of a newspaper as I understand it, and as Ha’aretz has understood throughout the years, even before I became responsible for the paper, even when my father was there . . . is not to give expression to emotionalism and feelings, but to give readers information about the important things. To set some sort of hierarchy of importance.

“With all due respect for the family at Itamar, when you compare that event, which was very grave – it was not the first time that Palestinians murdered Jews . . . It was a shocking case . . . Among others, there was the case of the father and the son who were killed in a car. These things do occur. And when you compare it in importance to the tsunami in Japan, with all due respect to our identification with the family in Itamar, this is an event that carries much more weight.

“The role of Ha’aretz is also to provide a perspective of how important things are in the world we live in,” he went on. “What is the role of a newspaper, after all? To give the reader some kind of picture of reality that is as faithful to reality as is possible. It is clear that our feelings can be with the victims of the tsunami in Japan and of course can be with the family in Itamar, and of course, it was a shocking murder.

“If you weigh the two events in terms of their true importance, then with all due respect, there is no comparison. With the tsunami in Japan, not only did more people perish there, but it is an event whose importance goes beyond just how many people it occurred to at that moment.”

What does Schocken mean by “due respect” to Haaretz’s “identification with the family in Itamar?”

While the journalism profession demands a degree of detachment from stories, there’s a difference between the how papers handle local and international news.

But more importantly, editors have to know and take care of their core constituents — local readers. When Israel was shaken by the brutal killing of three small children and their parents, Haaretz’s response was more befitting an international news aggregator.

If Schocken’s saying his paper’s reporting no differently than the rest of the rest of the Western media, what do I need Haaretz for?

I read Ha’aretz to find out what the enemy is thinking . It is rather sad to think that an Israeli newspaper can give voice to so much negativity . If there are 2 sides to a story , it will always be the negative ‘Israel is always wrong ‘ side . Still it is important to know what the other side thinks .
Ed Frias’ article above says it all

P. David Hornik
P. David Hornik, a writer and translator in Tel Aviv, is a columnist for FrontPageMag and blogs at pdavidhornik. typepad.com.
? More from this writer

Haaretz, Israel’s left-wing daily, used to be Israel’s newspaper of record and comparable to the New York Times, read also by those who differed from its line. Today Haaretz is read by less than 6 percent of Israelis, overwhelmingly composed of the country’s left-wing “elite.” Haaretz comes in far behind successful newcomer, right-of-center Israel Hayom at 38% and left-of-center Yediot Aharonot at 36%.

Haaretz’s English website, however, gets a very high Alexa ranking—around the 3900th most popular website in the world and currently neck-and-neck with the centrist Jerusalem Post and rightwing Arutz Sheva site. Indeed, Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu allegedly called (his office later denied it) Haaretz and the New York Times Israel’s “two main enemies” and said:

“They set the agenda for an anti-Israel campaign all over the world. Journalists read them every morning and base their news stories…on what they read in the New York Times and Haaretz”.

Whether or not Netanyahu said it, he could have added that foreign diplomats as well base their views of Israel, and their perceptions—however skewed—of Israeli opinion, on what they read in Haaretz.

For his part, Israeli justice minister Yaakov Neeman has allegedly gone even further and likened Haaretz to Der Stürmer.

Are such charges justified? To get an idea on whether they are, I followed Haaretz’s English website’s op-eds and editorials through the Israeli workweek of Sunday, January 29 to Friday, February 3. Having done the same experiment eight years ago, I can say right away that Haaretz has, if anything, gotten worse since then. (While its reporting is also biased, the bias is easier to demonstrate in opinion articles.) This despite the fact that last August, Aluf Benn became Haaretz’s new editor in chief).

For years Benn was a thoughtful left-of-center columnist for the paper who made valid, if arguable, points. Under his tenure, though, Haaretz has kept publishing the same bevy of radical leftists. It appears inevitable considering that the Schocken family, which has owned the paper since 1937, still holds a dominant 60% stake of Haaretz. In an op-ed last November, current Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken portrayed Israel as a country verging on apartheid.

During the week in question, January 29-February 3, Haaretz published 30 op-eds. Fifteen of these could be called neutral on political, left-right issues. Exactly one—by Haaretz’s sole regular right-wing columnist, Israel Harel—was a discussion from a right-wing perspective. Of the other 14, 11 were virulently left-wing and 3 more moderately so. As for the editorials, all six were harsh attacks on Israeli policy, leadership, and institutions. The following is only a sampling from the week.

On Sunday, Gideon Levy published a piece on a recent poll finding high levels of religious beliefs in the Israeli Jewish population. For instance, 84% believe in God, 70% believe Jews are the chosen people, 76% eat kosher at home—figures far beyond the approximately 25% of the Jewish population that is formally observant. This poll, to put it mildly, did not sit well with Levy and other Haaretz pundits.

Levy, for his part, wrote:

Expressions of racism toward Arabs and foreigners, Israel’s arrogant attitude toward international opinion—these too can be explained by the benighted, primeval belief of the majority of Israelis (70 percent ) that we enjoy complete license because You chose us.… we are in the West Bank above all because the majority of Israelis believe that it is not only the land of the patriarchs, but that this fact gives us a patrimonial right to sovereignty, to cruelty, to abuse and to occupation—and to hell with the position of the international community and the principles of international law, because, after all, we were chosen from among all other peoples.

That is not a valid polemic but, rather, an anti-Semitic rant. As Shmuel Rosner notes regarding the traditional Jewish belief in chosenness,

There’s nothing wrong with such belief. When Americans were asked by Gallup if their nation “has a unique character that makes it the greatest country in the world,” 80 percent said yes. According to a Pew survey, “About half of Americans (49 percent) and Germans (47 percent) agree with the statement, ‘Our people are not perfect, but our culture is superior to others.’”

Israelis, of course, do not regard chosenness as a license to commit crimes, and Levy cannot cite any evidence that they do. He just asserts it, or “spits it” would be more accurate.

Also riding the antireligious tide on Sunday, Amir Oren complained that the Israeli army “was another kind of army [once], before the chief rabbi of the air force took office, before the religious takeover of aircraft hangars, and their takeover of the rest of the Israel Defense Forces.” Oren approvingly quotes an anonymous letter to the chief of staff by a secular air force pilot:

…maybe I should let you know that the members of the air force, at least from [a certain] base, will not be meeting with authors, or guides who would teach them about nature and about various places around the country, or scientists or philosophers, or journalists or historians, or people looking at future trends. Only with religious people, whom my son describes as crazy. I find no reason to assume that this disease only exists on this one particular base…. Don’t be surprised if normal soldiers don’t find their place in your army of God.

If this sounds like hatred of religious Jews, it is; and it is no less clear that hatred of a category of Jews is anti-Semitism. It should be added that, whatever legitimate controversies may exist about religion’s role in the Israeli army, one reason it has become more prominent there is that religious Israelis now disproportionately volunteer to be officers and combat soldiers—a fact I didn’t come across anywhere in Haaretz’s rants.

And Sunday’s editorial weighed in on the “failed” (except that all serious commentators knew they didn’t stand a chance) Israeli-Palestinians talks in Jordan, saying these were intentionally scuttled by Israel and adding:

Netanyahu, with [Defense Minister Ehud] Barak’s help, has turned the Iranian nuclear threat into an impressive ploy to distract attention from settlement policy and the perpetuation of the occupation…. The death certificate of negotiations based on the two-state solution is a badge of shame for Israeli society. It’s hard to understand how a society that has so impressively brought social injustice to the top of the agenda has fallen victim to our nationalist-religious leaders’ criminal ploy.

Here it should be noted that neither Netanyahu nor—even less so—Barak is considered religious in Israeli terms. But these bad characters, we see—with “Israeli society” in tow—are leading the world by the nose on the Iranian-nuke issue so they can tighten their grip on the ‘West Bank’. If this reminds you of Walt, Mearsheimer, Patrick Buchanan, & Co., it should—and it’s coming from a made-in-Israel website.

That Israel is an “apartheid state” is, of course, another shibboleth of contemporary anti-Semitism. It was well represented in Haaretz on Monday by Druze writer and contributor Salman Masalha who, in another crude rant, drew direct parallels between Israel and apartheid South Africa. Then there was Akiva Eldar, whose tirade also featured the crafty, peace-destroying Netanyahu:

If Netanyahu had not existed, the settlers would have been forced to invent him. It has cost him peanuts to remove some of the roadblocks in the West Bank, to lift part of the blockade on the Gaza Strip, and to pay a bit of lip service to “the peace process.” And, he has managed to preserve all the settlers’ interests.

…Fact: It is possible to gobble up additional territories and also be depicted as a moderate leader while managing to keep relations with the United States and Europe intact.

The settlers can relax. The general positions outlined last week in Jordan to the Palestinians [were] nothing more than another exercise aimed at presenting Netanyahu as a partner to peace and the Palestinians as the ones who turn it down….

Tricky Jews at it again; all is subterfuge, don’t believe a word they say.

Especially offensive, though, was Monday’s column by Merav Michaeli, who also focused on the poll that so upset Gideon Levy but found a different significance in it:

The issue that should have sparked panic in the survey is the total consensus among Israeli Jews…that the “guiding principle” for the country and for Judaism itself is “to remember the Holocaust.” Ninety-eight percent of the respondents consider it either fairly important or very important to remember the Holocaust, attributing to it even more weight than to living in Israel, the Sabbath, the Passover seder and the feeling of belonging to the Jewish people.

…That’s the way it is with traumas…. Trauma leads to belligerence and a strong tendency to wreak havoc on one’s surroundings….

A very high societal awareness of the Holocaust—cause for “panic”! From a non-Haaretz perspective, this might be seen as an educational success and a welcome phenomenon. Holocaust survivors, it can be assumed, regard it that way, and so would the victims. But for columnist Michaeli, it’s something that drives Israelis to beat up on others—again, a familiar canard of the anti-Semites.

On Tuesday Avirama Golan gave her take on Israeli secondary education:

from year to year, Israeli children will participate in experiential tours in Israel and abroad. First they will lift their heads in national pride in the City of David and shed a Jewish tear at the Western Wall…. Two years later they will march with a huge Israeli flag in the suburbs of Warsaw, will hate Poles and will swear to take revenge on the Palestinians…. Never mind. In any case these children will be drafted, will be welcomed to the army by the rabbi of the base, who will blow the shofar in their honor. It’s better if they’re prepared.

It was more of the same on Wednesday. Bradley Burston heaped some more demonization on the Israeli leadership:

If we’re lucky, the threat (no more than the threat) of an Iran attack (Bibi and Barak’s Glory Days Redux fantasy) will be just one more dodge to keep settlers and their opponents at bay: long enough to make it to elections, long enough to get another fix of power…. Alternatively, they could do the bidding of the hard right. Shun the left, exploit the center, build like mad in the settlements and bomb Iran for good measure.

By now it should be emerging that—aside from portraying Israel as a country that touts a phony Iranian threat for its own nefarious purposes, or might start a Middle Eastern conflagration for its own sneaky reasons—Haaretz is not fond of “the settlers.” The fury toward Israelis who live in the West Bank—now numbering well over 300,000 and covering the full sociological spectrum—clearly smacks of pathological obsession. Wednesday’s column by Zvi Barel directed still more abuse at these people, depicting them as taking over the country while perhaps being “willing to give Israel equal rights under conditions dictated by the invaders of the hills.”

Thursday was somewhat quieter, with the aforementioned column by right-winger Harel and a few “neutrals.” But Ari Shavit came through with:

Over the past three years, Netanyahu has succeeded in decimating the left’s belief in peace with the Palestinians, and he is en route to destroying the world’s hopes as well. He has managed to convince both the Americans and the Europeans that the main topic on the world’s agenda must be Iran….

And Haaretz was back in full force on Friday. Yoel Marcus:

…The most worrying survey showed that 80 percent of Israelis believe in God…. this number is another element in the weakening of the left, the strengthening of the right, the reinforcement of the rabbis’ rule and the sanctity of the territories—and the continuation of the Bibi regime.

Former Knesset member and cabinet minister Yossi Sarid offered an imaginary letter to his parents by an Israeli schoolchild taken on a school tour of Hebron:

They should stop telling us stories—we’re not children anymore. With our own eyes we saw the settlers acting like the bosses, telling the soldiers and the policemen what to do.… Once I saw a movie called “To Hell and Back,” and that’s a pretty good description of the day we had. We discovered a grave new world, in which an abomination becomes a righteous deed, as long as it’s performed by authority of the Torah, of course…. I’m going to have to rethink everything, after I found out…that God has more support than…Netanyahu here: at least 80 percent, and a majority is a majority. Just as murder is murder…. I trust our education minister will examine our memories to discover what Hebron did to us as a city that really stinks.

And Doron Rosenblum:

It has become difficult in this country to distinguish, at least on the visual level, between a ceremony to dedicate a new Torah scroll and a walk to the cabinet meeting by the prime minister (who is “good for the Jews”) and his entourage of skullcap- and kerchief-wearers.…

To sum up, then, the gleanings from one week of Haaretz’s opinion articles: the Jewish religion is primitive and benighted, and Israeli Jews exploit it to abuse others. Religious Jews are taking over Israel and the Israeli army and constitute a “disease” in that army. Israeli is solely and deliberately responsible for the failure of Israeli-Palestinian talks, and craftily uses the Iranian threat to deceive Americans and Europeans and advance its goals. Israel is an apartheid state. Israelis are driven by the Holocaust to wreak havoc on others. Israeli schoolchildren are inculcated with a ludicrous religion, Judaism, and learn to hate Poles and Palestinians. Israel may bomb Iran just so its prime minister and defense minister can please the “hard right.” The “settlers” are demons, entirely evil.

One of Israel’s main enemies? Haaretz’s English website is certainly that, as it spews this vile nonsense all over the world. Der Stürmer? With its hatred and defamation of the Israeli Jewish people and of Judaism in general, its volleys of anti-Semitic stereotypes, Haaretz is not far off.

But what about Steve Linde of the Jerusalem Post spreading the false information that Mr. Netanyahu should have called Haaretz and NYT “the two main enemies of Israel”?( Mr. Netanyahu himself denies this.) Do you call that serious journalism? It looks more like professional jealousy to me.
Mr. Netanyahu has one of the most difficult jobs on earth, he can surely do without such libel.

I remember the Toulouse massacres. It occupied all the relevant front pages for days, not only in France, but all around. “Le Monde” and others opened live streams for news and comments which had an unprecedented number of followers and lasted until the death of the killer. Don’t ask me what else happened in the world during these days, I wouldn’t know.

There is another difference between the two events. This difference is between an accident,no matter how dreadful, and an exceptionally brutal act of cold-blooded murder. No matter how epic the scale of an accident it is not the same morally as deliberate murder. The views of the editor of Haaretz are despicable and his rationalisation of his coverage of these events is barely an excuse for the obvious moral inversion so frequently adopted by that newspaper……..blaming the victim (Israel) for the crimes of the perpetrator, the Palestinian entity or whatever it is.

I’m Israeli and Ha’aretz no longer has anything to do with me. It’s certainly not a constituents newspaper. That’s why all the headlines include Israel in the so-called “third person” just like you’d see in a forein newspaper. Sensational and misleading for international readers like: “Israel has been taken over by a deep horrifying apathy.” And here’s a good one “Palestinians are heroes, braving Israeli dictatorship.” Also, Haaretz was the magazine that well received Anat Kamm ‘s stolen classified documents. My problem with Haaretz is not that it is not “with us” – it is clearly leaning against us.

Thank you, Steve, I was really asking, for though I am well instructed in Jewish culture and history I know next to nothing of Israeli politics. I am trying to learn, but I am also a little frightened because people are so easily offended and the ugly word “antisemite” is always lurking in the background.

I have a saying- Not all anti-Zionists/Israelis are anti-Semites But as sure as “Eggs are Eggs”
All anti-Semites are anti-anti-Zionists/Israelis.

I am, as I have said, not an Israeli- Israeli politics are no different from most other Western type democracies.
Its main problem in my opinion it has a voting system of a form of “Proportional Representation”.
There are many countries that use this method, however thats just the way I think.
I abhor those Jews such as the American journalist Finlkestein and the UK politician Kauffman.
Both have this desire to de-legitimise the state. Again in my opinion is because Israel took the help of the USA instead of becoming another satellite of the USSR- and thus path into the M.E and its oil. After the 48/50 war.

Now if Israel had not to spend between 40-60% of its GDP on defense, can you imagine the standard of living the population would have- It matters not who is in power as long as the government puts the safety of Israel foremost.

I believe that Mr. Schocken the elder who’s biography was written in book form did not dream that his son/grandson would be such a vociferous anti jewish advocate giving the gentile world more reasons to hate the jews. He is probably turning over in his grave. unfortunately the jews throughout the ages were burdened with these albatroses. The best thing would be if the haaretz newspaper would be thrown in the garbage immediately so that peoples blood pressure would not go through the roof . It is truly sad that we have fools such as Amos Shocken among us

I appreciate the critical journalism of Haaretz, but then I am a European and not even Jewish, and I am afraid Mr. Joseph Marmor will call me an anti-Semite. So be it.
But even I have often been flabbergasted by the amount of abuse they allow in the comments from their readers. There seems to be absolutely no control, it’s a shame.

Years ago I stopped reading Ha’aretz because of it’s anti-Israel perspective. It’s a bunch of Jews who care more about the Palestinians than about Jews and who blame Israel for all of the Palestinians’ woes. It’s tries to be like the European, elite liberals, with their White Man’s burden view of the world. Pure drivel. Pure trash.

The only people who the rag Haaretz are the European leftists and anti-semites. I lived in Israel for 10 years and did not know anyone who read that garbage. WE should treat them as the irrelevant self inflated windbags that they are.

Shoken verbally slithers around like a snake with his forked tongue going back and forth convincing us of his good intentions. One has to laugh at his reference to
reporting on facts vs. emotions. His jolly lineup of calumnists who castigate Israel on command by this less than honest newsbroker demonstrates how untrue his words and actions are.

his writers must be highly trained jew haters who continuously raise the bar of attack vs.
any group or person who speaks against leftist dogma. Like the pig who shows his ‘kosher’ hoof
trying to appear kosher, this man is a sad excuse for someone who pretends to be jewish but
continues to demonstrate his keen ability to attack and destroy traditional, to the right Judaism.