This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: Saudi Arabia in Talks to boost oil supplies

Ever hear the expression, "If you it doesn't apply to you, then don't worry about it"? Perhaps that is applicable here?

Alotta people believe that God caused evolution. Shall we say that in the science classes, as well? Won't happen, will it?

Reality matches exactly what I say, brother.

I figured out your problem. You're not seeing the difference between observations and beliefs. Science has no evidence either for or against the idea that evolution was caused by a divine being, therefore such information does not belong in a science class. What science does have is an enormous amount of evidence along several lines of research in favor of the idea that species do evolve.

There's no scientific evidence of a divine hand in evolution. Creationists will point you towards "evidence," but it always either banks on something unobservable or just plain wrong. (like the banana-human hand thing... banana's are a hybrid created by humans!!)

Last edited by Deuce; 02-25-11 at 07:13 PM.

He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear

Re: Saudi Arabia in Talks to boost oil supplies

Originally Posted by Deuce

I figured out your problem. You're not seeing the difference between observations and beliefs. Science has no evidence either for or against the idea that evolution was caused by a divine being, therefore such information does not belong in a science class. What science does have is an enormous amount of evidence along several lines of research in favor of the idea that species do evolve.

There's no scientific evidence of a divine hand in evolution. Creationists will point you towards "evidence," but it always either banks on something unobservable or just plain wrong. (like the banana-human hand thing... banana's are a hybrid created by humans!!)

However, you'll never hear any science teacher suggest that evolution was caused by God.

BTW, I don't have a ****ing, "problem".

Originally Posted by americanwoman

So there is absolutely no evidence this woman, whom you called a slut, did this but you are ready to take someone's word as evidence. Guess you don't think witch hunts have to end when it's going after the certain people.

Many people learned in Elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty -- above a mere hypothesis but below a law. Scientists do Not use the terms that way, however. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature. So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution -- or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter -- they are Not expressing reservations about its truth.

In addition to the theory of evolution, meaning the idea of descent with modification, one may also speak of the Fact of evolution."..."

Tell me you're a Holy Book literalist/creationist among your other bizarre opinions.
This would be 100% in keeping with my statements in other sections.

Last edited by mbig; 02-26-11 at 03:56 PM.

I'm personally sick of not being able to dunk a basketball because of racism.﻿
anon