Hello. There is a minor issue I've found while playing your highest diff.

02:44:572 - This kiai starts late, while on the other diffs it starts on this spot.

Additional notes:

[Beyond Astronomical Twilight]

00:27:384 - Well, there are some inherited points that do nothing like 00:27:384 - this one. You can just change the volume to 67% on 00:27:345 - that one, no need for 2nd inherited point. This situation exists on this SV build-up generally.

00:22:697 - Considering main notes are on vocal sounds (referring to 00:23:165 (91,92,93) - these for example) I recommend deleting this note.

03:21:290 - You missed some of the 1/6 sounds like this one, and you mapped them everywhere else. There is no reason to skip this one too, for example. If you agree, 03:06:290 - make this 1/6 too. dddk would be nice due to the sounds. There are a few occurences like that, so please change them all if you agree.

03:08:009 - 03:18:009 - Even though these flow good, they don't really represent a specific sound like the other 1/6 patterns. Please consider them changing to 1/4.

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hello. There is a minor issue I've found while playing your highest diff.

02:44:572 - This kiai starts late, while on the other diffs it starts on this spot.Changed

Additional notes:

[Beyond Astronomical Twilight]

00:27:384 - Well, there are some inherited points that do nothing like 00:27:384 - this one. You can just change the volume to 67% on 00:27:345 - that one, no need for 2nd inherited point. This situation exists on this SV build-up generally. Technically it does something. As the volume changes were all made months before I even considered adding SV, of course it may look weird considering they don't match up. To further reason why I won't bother changing this, you just stated above about kiai inconsistency between difficulties, and altering this would make the volume change at different times between difficulties (also really, this doesn't impact gameplay at all, so...)

00:22:697 - Considering main notes are on vocal sounds (referring to 00:23:165 (91,92,93) - these for example) I recommend deleting this note. Perhaps you heard incorrectly, 00:22:384 (86,87,88,89,90,91) is six notes for the six words in the vocals "lights are out and there's sweat." Did change to dkkddk though because it sounds nicer.

00:36:759 (197) - I think a finisher works here nicely. Sounds good

01:20:822 ~ 01:21:290 - My suggestion between these spots is (kkkd) d (kddk) d (paranthesis means 1/6) while kddk fits pretty well on those high-pitched background sounds. After revising this, I realised that the first 1/6 at 01:20:822 (603,604,605,606) doesn't continuously rise, so I changed it to a dkkd. The second 1/6 at 01:21:134 (608,609,610,611) however will remain as is because it matches a sound I make as kkkd throughout the entire map. As it stands now, I am satisfied with (dkkd)d(kkkd)d(kkkkkkd) as it sounds well and isn't awkward to play like (dkkk)d(kkkd) was.

03:21:290 - You missed some of the 1/6 sounds like this one, and you mapped them everywhere else. There is no reason to skip this one too, for example. If you agree, 03:06:290 - make this 1/6 too. dddk would be nice due to the sounds. There are a few occurences like that, so please change them all if you agree. Changed; I had the same 1/6 mapped between all of my bookmarks for consistency sake, this just changed between kiai and non-kiai. I suppose I'll add dddk at 02:51:290 as well then.

03:08:009 - 03:18:009 - Even though these flow good, they don't really represent a specific sound like the other 1/6 patterns. Please consider them changing to 1/4.

Jaye wrote:

I debated quite a lot with myself how to do this, I tried dkdddd(kkkd) and dk(dddd)d(kkkd); the first doesn't do the sounds justice and the second is just straight up awkward to play.I will change it if a better idea comes along.

From response to Arrival.To further add, making the (kkkd) a 1/4 kkd also just makes me ignore mapping a 1/6, which you stated earlier I should be doing in certain places that I missed (even though that was intentional).Risk it for the biscuit.

01:34 *frukoyurdakul is playing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1135874 USAO - Night Sky (Extended Mix) [Beyond Astronomical Twilight]] <Taiko>01:53 Jaye: Just lemme know if anything is wrong with it, I suppose01:53 frukoyurdakul: I'll come back at you in a moment02:01 frukoyurdakul: hello again, you available?02:02 Jaye: Yeah02:02 Jaye: For now02:02 frukoyurdakul: wanted to ask something02:02 *frukoyurdakul is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1135874 USAO - Night Sky (Extended Mix) [Beyond Astronomical Twilight]]02:02 Jaye: Sure, what's up?02:03 frukoyurdakul: 02:30:978 - you are following the keyboard there right?02:03 frukoyurdakul: because I hear the drums as 1/402:03 frukoyurdakul: and then 02:31:447 - 1/8 here02:04 Jaye: tbh I have no idea what instrument that even is at 02:30:978 -02:04 frukoyurdakul: I just assumed it as keyboard lol02:04 Jaye: either way02:04 Jaye: 02:43:478 - it sounds the same as this02:04 frukoyurdakul: but I suppose that's your focus02:05 frukoyurdakul: yeah reasonable, 02:44:415 - but this one is not same02:05 Jaye: yeah I know02:05 Jaye: That's was just improv I added because it was awkward to play without02:06 frukoyurdakul: makes sense02:06 frukoyurdakul: 02:53:947 - what are those emphasize?02:06 frukoyurdakul: the melody goes down there, and I think 1/2 snap will be more appropriate02:06 Jaye: hmm02:07 Jaye: I mapped it to the vocal since no sound plays, but Taikocracy also made a similar suggestion the other day which I changed02:07 Jaye: So I guess I'll change this too02:07 Jaye: removed 02:54:025 and 02:54:181 -02:08 frukoyurdakul: nice02:08 frukoyurdakul: 03:11:290 - 1/6 dddk02:08 frukoyurdakul: same sound as before02:08 Jaye: hmm02:09 Jaye: tbh it's hard to hear02:09 Jaye: I think skipping it would be fine, since we're also not in a kiai or otherwise intense section of the song02:09 Jaye: if not I can just add it, no big deal02:09 frukoyurdakul: yeah not clear as 03:06:290 - this one02:09 frukoyurdakul: but I said that because of consistency02:09 frukoyurdakul: if makes sense, you should change02:09 Jaye: I think if anything02:09 Jaye: 03:16:290 -02:09 Jaye: I should add it here02:10 frukoyurdakul: yeah was about to say that02:10 Jaye: to match 03:06:290 -02:10 frukoyurdakul: exactly02:12 frukoyurdakul: 03:23:322 - expected something like 1/4 1/602:13 Jaye: hmm02:13 Jaye: 03:23:322 - and 03:23:634 - are candidates for 1/6 but not so sure02:14 Jaye: They don't have the same kind of vibe that all my other 1/6 has02:14 Jaye: I think at best I'd probably join the streams with a k at 03:23:400 -02:14 frukoyurdakul: 03:33:322 - I think they sound similiar like this one02:16 Jaye: Hmm, I'd have to disagree02:16 Jaye: 03:33:322 - has a distinct drilling like sound02:16 frukoyurdakul: yeah sounds about right02:16 frukoyurdakul: similiar, but not the same02:16 frukoyurdakul: so your choice02:17 Jaye: II'll try 1/602:17 Jaye: and see if it sounds alright02:17 Jaye: Else I'll just join the streams with a kat02:17 frukoyurdakul: okay02:18 Jaye: yeah I'll avoid using 1/6 here02:21 frukoyurdakul: okay02:21 frukoyurdakul: I guess that's all02:21 Jaye: Aight, sweet02:24 Jaye: Updated btw02:25 frukoyurdakul: yup, checked02:25 frukoyurdakul: seems fine

AlvaroYL wrote:

Shouldn't this need a difficulty between Ulqui's Inner Oni and Beyond Astronomical Twilight? There's a 2.2* jump between one diff and the other and it certainly feels like an incomplete spread.

no, when the diffs boil down to 2 different inner onis the spread between them does not have to be progressive... especially in the case where the sr has been inflated by 1/6 usage. sr is not a good indication of spread.