In mathematics, the lexicographic or lexicographical order, (also known as dictionary order, alphabetical order or lexicographic(al) product), is a natural order structure of the Cartesian product of two ordered sets.
Given two partially ordered sets A and B, the lexicographical order on the Cartesian product A × B is defined as
:(a,b) ≤ (a′,b′) if and only if a 1a2 ... ak
appears in a dictionary before a sequence
:b1b2 ... bk
if and only if the first ai which is different from bi comes before bi in the alphabet. That assumes both have the same length; what is us...

Oh, you know what. It was meant to be...this. (Edited.) Does that clarify? (It's what I intended, forgot. Same with SO post.) I think that's correct, I'm hazy too. Basically it just references whatever it was passed long enough to cast it to something else. (Temporaries would last long enough for it to work.)

I'm not sure if mX(pX) should be mX(std::forward<T>(pX)), I don't think it does since it's a reference type getting initialized.

Yeah, had a tiny argument with that recently about macro's. If you needed a temporary in a macro, for example, is it reasonable to identify it with _macro_name_temporary_ and except that to be good enough?

He was arguing that's still possible to break if someone else happened to use that name. I said that's just dumb.

Then said in a RL case, someone else was writing their own macro, saw that was a "good temporary name" so copy and pasted it. Then if you nested the macro's, it would fail. I said that's just a dumb programmer, not a bad macro. He should have used the convention in place, and like you you said the convention should have enough uniqueness to not conflict those names.

I may have been chasing a red herring on the unknown types, since as long as they only depend on template parameters, they can be resolved (no matter how long it takes) once the function is instantiated, and instantiation doesn't require the return type of f at that point

that leaves only recursion

but that can be indirect recursion depending on the exact type of A

now I suspect that's simply disallowed; e.g. a required diagnostic if the decltype depends on a recursive call (i.e. the exact same instantiation) in any way

I am trying to create a small webserver that interfaces with the php-cgi binary. However, things aren't going so well. The php-cgi binary correctly handles GET requests. When it comes to POST requests, the $_POST array is empty, even when things are getting POSTed.
I've checked the HTTP headers ...

:46752 I should probably add that I'm rather biased against videos of technical content -- they usually take a lot of time to say very little in a highly forgettable fashion (and this seemed to fit that pattern).

If my main program and the DLL has the same global variable name and type (exported), at run time when the DLL is loaded using LoadLibrary, will they be resolved to the same variable?

user366076

5:55 AM

Hi , I have a small question ... If my main program and the DLL has the same global variable name and type (exported), at run time when the DLL is loaded using LoadLibrary, will they be resolved to the same variable?

I have this question because , I succeeded to do variable sharing under Linux, between shared library and main by declaring extern var in the shared library and the concrete variable definition of var in main , but this tricks seems not working under Windows

:46844 I've read a fair amount, but definitely not all. It's tough going, and after a first try (from which I learned nearly nothing) I realized that you have to work the problems to get much from it, and they get to be tough going.

I am trying to create a small webserver that interfaces with the php-cgi binary. However, things aren't going so well. The php-cgi binary correctly handles GET requests. When it comes to POST requests, the $_POST array is empty, even when things are getting POSTed.
I've checked the HTTP headers ...

:46867 Ok, thanks. I'm just trying to decide whether to commit the time to reading it; I figure it will be a major undertaking. I'm not much into heavy theory stuff, but the book looked really, really interesting.

This isnt a homework question. I took data structures at a Community College and now that i am at the university i talked to the teacher about there data structures class. Now, since its really different and the class i took transferred, He gave me one of there assignments and said play with it. ...