Raytheon

Editor’s note: If anyone is questioning this US Navy Scientist’s information, here are his credentials for verification: https://imgur.com/a/641ih

Yesterday what appears to be a legitimate atmospheric scientist in the US Navy for 10 years posted to Reddit, explaining that the massive aerosol geoengineering program people suspect is going on is in fact underway.

Geoengineering activists such as Patrick Roddie have archived the post.

He started off by explaining he held interim secret clearance from 2001 to 2003 in the US Navy as an atmospheric scientist, and then “Secret from 2003 to 2005. Then interim TS from 2005-2006, TS from 2006 to 2010,” according to his post.

He said he decided to post because he has been seeing some things come out of the climate sector that “indicate a soon to come unveiling of an ongoing program that began shortly before I started working for the Navy,”

True: the skies are openly being sprayed right now, and people such as David Keith and John Brennan are proposing that the US start spraying, as if it isn’t already happening.

The alleged whistleblower said he attended a classified climate summary in Norfolk in 2002, in which diminishing ice presence in the Arctic was discussed, and it was made clear that Earth’s magnetic field changing is the cause of global warming, not human activity.

But most importantly, he summarized info from a more intimate viewpoint that had been covered in extensive detail in books before: info about climate engineering.

The post explains:

There had already been some research done in the later part of the 20th century in testing different aerosols and their effects on manipulating weather features by seeding clouds. For instance, they had tested cloud seeding the eye of a Hurricane to try and diminish the exhaust mechanism and inhibit growth to reduce coastal impacts of large tropical systems. (it was not successful for more than a brief period). The idea was that by injecting nanoaerosols into the upper tropopause or lower stratosphere we could create a thin ice layer that would increase the albedo of the planet and slow global warming. (At that time the metals being used were not the same as what is currently being used. From what i understand they have began using aluminols instead of silver)

This is what is called “ChemTrails”. Boeing and Lockheed martin as well as Raytheon polar services began implementing these devices in commercial jets about 150-20 years ago.” (maybe he meant to say 50 years instead of 150?)

He’s of course talking about… this.

This is the exact same info that was presented by researchers such as Peter A. Kirby, from the perspective of a researcher rather than a low level insider. Entire books have been written about this.

Raytheon seems to be one of the most central “defense” contractors to climate engineering, being intimately involved with the “HAARP-type” facilities, and the energy being blasted into the stratosphere to interact with the sprayed aluminum aerosols.

The post continues:

As an atmospheric physicist I have to say, the climate engineering that is taking place is irresponsible. There are no studies on nanized aluminols and the health effects. Sure it can take decades or longer for suspended particles in the stratosphere to settle into the lower atmosphere and eventually the surface, but they WILL eventually settle! Lithometers will not remain up for ever… AND we have yet to address the real root of the problem… and we likely NEVER WILL…

here is why…

our magnetosphere is weakening in part or whole due to the increased amount of EMF that is being produced on our earth and sent out into space, or being refracted and reflected off of the sheet of injected particles for comms. EMFs cause cancer for the same reason that we are seeing these changes. Interfering phase lengths of man made EMF with naturally occurring EMFs. And they will not admit to it because it will hinder military and government comms as well as other programs that use satellite link or programs that radiate strong EM waves into space. (HAARP).

What this man is saying, is that disclosure of geoengineering is coming soon. It’s been happening for the past several years.

The CIA director came out at the Council on Foreign Relations in 2016 and called for the skies to be sprayed.

Harvard figure David Keith is pushing for the spraying of the skies.

NASA sprayed colorful toxic barium and geoengineering related metals in the sky, convincing the public to look at it like some meteor shower or natural beauty in a disgusting show of normalization earlier this year.

To really understand this issue, read some articles by Peter A. Kirby here, or his book about it here.

Lockheed Martin is the biggest “winner,” most analysts agree, with some $28 billion in weapons and equipment out of the initial $110 billion going to them, and likely to get the biggest sum out of anyone else in the subsequent parts and maintenance that will bring it to a record $350 billion overall.

Others say Raytheon may be a “dark horse” for investors, with the company’s wildly expensive Patriot missile systems likely to be a substantial chunk of the Saudi purchase. Still, it’s hard to see them matching Lockheed’s sale of planes to drop more bombs on Yemen.

Still, when picking winners the situation is very much relative, as when the arms makers all belly up to the bar to get a chunk of this deal, you can bet the Trump Administration will ensure all the big ones get a taste. That’s why virtually all the big arms makers, and not just Lockheed and Raytheon, are touching record highs. Everybody’s got something coming here, and with $350 billion to go around, it can’t help but be big for them.

President Trump is eager to present the deal as good for jobs, good to the economy, and Wall Street is eager to project winners.

You don’t need a crystal ball to predict the losers, of course.

Top of the list is Yemen, and following closely behind is whomever else the Saudis decide to attack with all these costly weapons in the years that follow.

The Tomahawk missiles fired by the US Navy against a Syrian air base rang up at approximately $1.4 million per missile — and the markets responded by rewarding their manufacturer’s stock.

While a 2.3 percent change seems modest, consider how it impacts Raytheon’s total market value. Sputnik calculates that based on Raytheon’s Thursday closing price of $150.75, the company’s market value was $44.1 billion. When the markets opened on Friday morning, Raytheon’s value had shot up to $45.4 billion.

On Thursday night, the USS Ross and USS Porter fired not one, not two, but 59 missiles at the Syrian Army’s Shayrat airbase. According to US Navy spokesman Rob Koon, each missile costs $1.41 million. Sputnik estimates, then, that Thursday’s strike cost the Navy roughly $83 million on the missiles alone.

Washington believes the airfield played an important role in Assad’s alleged chemical attack in Idlib earlier this week.

In midday trading, Raytheon’s stock cooled off but was still a net gainer since before the attack.

Environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) for military use constitute, in the present context of global warfare, the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.

Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change, the world’s weather can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons.

Both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the climate for military use.

Environmental modification techniques have been applied by the US military for more than half a century.

US mathematician John von Neumann, in liaison with the US Department of Defense, started his research on weather modification in the late 1940s at the height of the Cold War and foresaw ‘forms of climatic warfare as yet unimagined’. During the Vietnam war, cloud-seeding techniques were used, starting in 1967 under Project Popeye, the objective of which was to prolong the monsoon season and block enemy supply routes along the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

The US military has developed advanced capabilities that enable it selectively to alter weather patterns.

The technology, which was developed under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), is an appendage of the Strategic Defense Initiative – ‘Star Wars’. From a military standpoint, HAARP is is a weapon of mass destruction, operating from the outer atmosphere and capable of destabilising agricultural and ecological systems around the world.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Weather-modification, according to the US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report,

“offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary”, capabilities, it says, extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes:

‘Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog and storms on earth or to modify space weather… and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of [military] technologies.”

While the substance of the 1977 Convention was reasserted in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, debate on weather modification for military use has become a scientific taboo.

Military analysts and scientists are mute on the subject. Meteorologists are not investigating the matter and environmentalists are largely focussing on greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. The possibility of climatic or environmental manipulations as part of a military and intelligence agenda, while tacitly acknowledged, is not part of the broader debate on climate change under UN auspices.

While discussion of the post Cold War military applications of weather warfare is a taboo, the US Air Force has nonetheless acknowledged the strategic importance of ENMOD techniques in the modern battlefield of non-conventional warfare and intel ops, including the conduct, without the enemy’s knowledge, of “covert” weather modification operations.

At this juncture in our history, US-NATO forces are deployed worldwide.

The US and its allies are waging war on Syria and Iraq and targeting Iran and North Korea. They are also threatening Russia and China.

The Pentagon has formulated the contours of a global military agenda, a “long war”, a war without borders.

“Weather warfare” is the ultimate WMD with the potential of destabilizing an enemy’s ecosystem, destroying its agriculture, disabling communications networks. In other words, ENMOD techniques can undermine an entire national economy, impoverish millions of people and “kill a nation” without the deployment of troops and military hardware.

This essay is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Rosalie Bertell, who, from the very outset revealed the diabolical nature of the HAARP project, as part of an integrated non-conventional weapons program:

“It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. … HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. … The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amounts of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer.“

It is my sincere hope that this article will renew the debate on the dangers of weather warfare and will contribute to the broader objective of World peace which requires the relentless “disarming” of the US- NATO military apparatus.

Officially, the HAARP program has been closed down at its location in Alaska. The technology of weather modification shrouded in secrecy, nonetheless prevails.

Michel Chossudovsky, May 18 2015

Weather Warfare

The significant expansion in America’s weather warfare arsenal, which is a priority of the Department of Defense is not a matter for debate or discussion. While, environmentalists blame the Bush administration for not having signed the Kyoto protocol, the issue of “weather warfare”, namely the manipulation of weather patterns for military use is never mentioned.

The US Air Force has the capability of manipulating climate either for testing purposes or for outright military-intelligence use. These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes. In recent years, large amounts of money have been allocated by the US Department of Defense to further developing and perfecting these capabilities.

Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, … and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power. (US Air Force, emphasis added. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report,

Primary Sidebar

About A Sheep No More

A Sheep No More is no longer plugged into the Matrix like the many sheep who are still programmed to believe that they have correct information provided by a varied and “independent media.” In fact the media is owned by 5 or 6 mega-media companies run by corporate advertising executives and Washington.