"The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the
righteous are bold as a lion." Proverbs 28:1

It is being reported that J.A.I.L. Amendment E lost
big in yesterday's election -- 90% against to 10% in favor. This figure does not
even amount to the number of voters who signed the petition in the first place
to qualify Amendment E for the ballot. Supposedly, the issue of Judicial
Accountability failed to even amount to a blip on the radar screen, and fared
worse than every other issue on the ballot. 90% versus 10% on any ballot issue is very rare! Just
seven weeks ago, on September 19th, Amendment E was better than 3-to-1 in its
favor according to a poll by Zogby International. See the entire revealing
article atSept. 19, 2006 Poll Reveals
Amendment E Gaining Its Lead Even More.

So, with an epidemic of everyone across
this nation crying for redress, having very egregious personal horror stories to
tell of their injuries due to arrogant and oppressive judges, what is wrong with
this picture? Do not people want relief from a repressive judicial system? Do
people love their judges and want to hug them?

The fact is, the voters of South Dakota
were never presented with, nor voted upon, J.A.I.L. Contrariwise, J.A.I.L.
as written, was fairly described for the California ballot in 2000 by State
Attorney General Bill Lockyer who stated:

While J.A.I.L. (Amendment E in South
Dakota) according to A.G. Lockyer is clearly about "judges," Tom Barnett, the
director of the South Dakota Bar Association, while campaigning against
Amendment E, says he found that the message of "judicial independence," in
arguing why judges should be immune, was not selling well with the voters; so he
changed the theme of the campaign to a new theme, which is, "It is not about
judges. It is about us."

"It is not about judges"? "It is
about us"? Does not Barnett refute the findings of A.G. Lockyer that it is
about "Judges"? So what is he saying when he says, "It is about us"?
Who is "us"? Is "us" the lawyers of the Bar Association he heads? Is "us" the
oil conglomerates, banking cartels, multi-billion-dollar insurance corporations
who financed the opposition? Has not he, and the opposition, employed the
use of lies and deception upon the voters to defraud them out of what they would
have otherwise voted for?

Corruption of the entire
South Dakota Legislature

I now turn to the corruption of the
entire South Dakota Legislature who, at the beginning of the campaign,
unanimously "passed" a resolution against Amendment E urging the voters to
reject it, using taxpayer-funded facilities and dollars to do so. Such act is
criminal and strictly forbidden by South Dakota Codified Law
12-13-16.

Publication of false or
erroneous information on constitutional amendment or submitted question as
misdemeanor.

Any person knowingly printing,
publishing, or delivering to any voter of this state a document containing any
purported constitutional amendment, question, law, or measure to be submitted to
the voters at any election, in which such constitutional amendment, question,
law, or measure is misstated, erroneously printed, or by which false or
misleading information is given to the voters, is guilty of a Class 2
misdemeanor.

Now these legislators cannot let the law get in their
way in pursuing the defeat of Amendment E, can they? God forbid that these
lawmakers should be subject to their own criminal code, for then they would have
to be arrested and tried on those criminal charges! So I ask, Why do we have
this criminal statute on the books? I suggest this ineffective "law" be
removed from the law books. Why retain vain laws?

And then there is this little matter called "The
Constitution of the State of South Dakota" which they have all sworn with an
oath to uphold and defend. "§1. Right to vote. Elections shall be free and
equal, and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent
the free exercise of the right of suffrage." Art. VII, §1. The "right to vote"
obviously applies to an honest and unfettered election, not to a
criminally-influenced voting scam. Twice we placed every legislator in South
Dakota on notice by U.S. mail of their criminal conduct, but they ignored us and
proceeded on with the election process as if everything was regular and normal.

Misrepresentation by Attorney General
Larry Long

Now we come to South Dakota Attorney General Larry
Long's role in wrapping up this conspiratorial election fraud. He could not wait
to throw the election in his "explanation" as to what the voters were voting
upon. He set up the wording to allow the opposition to develop their argument
that Amendment E was about letting felons out of prison so that they could go
after the jurors who placed them behind bars. Here enters the
fear-and-intimidation factor of the voters who have asked me if they could be
arrested and jailed for voting for a conviction. I kid you not,
folks, that the voters were being told they could be arrested as a
juror for the decisions they might make. Now keep in mind that this is supposed
to represent the objective of J.A.I.L., and what the voters were voting
upon!

Abraham Lincoln said,
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some
of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time." If
you accept the "official" results, 10% of the People of South Dakota were not
fooled in this instance.

Amendment E did not fail at the polls--it
was never presented for a vote

If Amendment E was about what the voters were being
propagandized that it was, not even I would have voted for it -- and I am the
author who wrote the words! My point is that Amendment E (J.A.I.L.) did
not fail at the polls. It just was never presented on the ballot for a vote. It
was suggested that I stop the election on Amendment E before it took place, but
I stated that the "election process" could not be stopped unless federal
authorities stopped it for a fraud investigation.

It became obvious that the entire state government
was clearly conflicted, and they could never admit that they were bent on acting
out their fraudulent election, come hell or high water. I realized this when I
heard of their literally flooding the airwaves with their false and misleading
propaganda of what Amendment E was about, just prior to the election. My hope
and expectation was that the voters of South Dakota could nevertheless see
through the fraud and deception and vote for the truth. However, that was not to
be!

True are the words of the Scripture, "My people
are destroyed for lack of knowledge:" Hosea 4:6. Unfortunately, the people
have not yet learned the consistent truth that you can never, never, ever trust
government. As stated by George Washington, "Government is not reason;
it is not eloquence; it is force, like a fire, it is a dangerous servant and a
fearful master."

What Are The Implications
of This Entirely Fraudulent Government?

1. They have forfeited their
public trust and must resign

First off, all of these government
officials have forfeited their public trust, and must be forced to resign and
surrender their office to more worthy men. The South Dakota government has
demonstrated that they are unwilling to repent of their evil devices, and must
be removed from office by an outside authority, or a greater authority within.

I have recommended that those voters in
South Dakota who find that they were deceived by the fraudulent election, draw
up, with help if needed, a criminal affidavit supporting probable cause that
they were the victim of this fraudulent election, and file it with the F.B.I.
and with the U.S. Attorney. The more the better. I
know that some have already proceeded with this project. We should first give
the federal authorities a reasonable opportunity to investigate and move in on
the government of South Dakota.

Also, I am recommending that these
citizens further file an affidavit of criminal conduct, citing the laws of the
State of South Dakota, with their County Grand Juries.

As to the higher authority within, I
refer to the People themselves. Once it is established that no one will do
anything to enforce the law, then the remedy necessarily, under the Declaration
of Independence, must rest with the People. The highest authority of arresting
power lies with the People in making citizen's arrests, as all other powers of
arrest are derived as a privilege granted from the People's power of arrest. All
official power to arrest is subordinate to that of the People. (Declaration of
Independence).

Should such arrests take place, it
follows that the arrestees must constitutionally be delivered to a magistrate.
However, since there is no state magistrate that does not have a conflict of
interest, the appropriate magistrate should be a federal magistrate, before whom
an affidavit supporting probable cause should be laid. (Fourth Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution.)

2. The people's right to
vote has been violated

At issue here is the right to vote in
an election having integrity. If the government of South Dakota is allowed to
tamper with the voting process using the public's money, it will set a precedent
encouraging other jurisdictions to see if they, too, can do the same and get
away with it. We must keep in mind that government will always become as corrupt
in its election process as will be tolerated. Voting is not only a right within
state jurisdictions, but also in federal jurisdiction. The violation of this
right is a federal crime prosecutable by the U.S. Attorney, (Title 18, USC
242.)

3. It has national
implications

Further, all people of other states
have an interest in fair elections. If the officials of the government of South
Dakota can conduct elections in violation of criminal laws with impunity, such
conduct will eventually contaminate their own states. I therefore recommend that
everyone in this country raise their voices appropriately in objection to
tolerating this evil being perpetrated by the government of South Dakota. They
absolutely must be punished for their gross evil deeds against the People. We
are a Union of States, and no State can be an Island unto itself when it comes
to citizens of this country. ("... And the state of South Dakota is an
inseparable part of the American Union..." Art VI, §26). We all, therefore,
have an interest in protecting our common right to vote in sound elections
within this Union. Once we submit ourselves to the existence of election
fraud with impunity, we thereby forfeit our future to tyrants who will decide
everything for us without our permission.

If we are willing to fight, and
sacrifice our lives, for the right to vote in foreign nations, should we not be
willing to contend for that same right here in our own country?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Truth can never reach
agreement with a lie

I have been told that "we will just
have to fight harder next time for the passage of J.A.I.L." But what this view
overlooks is that we are not here engaged in a fair fight. A fight that entails
our having our hands tied behind our backs, and allows our opponents to wear
brass knuckles, is not a ring which we climb into to try to "fight harder," We
need a referee that is neutral, not one that is the state government holding a
bet on the outcome.

Also, I have been told, "we need to
re-write the J.A.I.L. Initiative so that this will never happen again." This
presupposes that the J.A.I.L. Initiative, as currently written, is faulty and
needs to satisfy the opponents. This view ignores the fact that never, in any
fashion, can J.A.I.L. be re-written in a thousand years to meet the acceptance
and approval of the opposition. Such objective can never be accomplished with
thousands of new amendments. Truth can never reach a mutual agreement with a
lie. At issue here is not whether or not one agrees with J.A.I.L., but rather,
whether we are entitled to elections adhering to the basics of integrity. Are
you ready to give up your right to vote? If not, you have no choice left but to
fight for your right to vote by whatever means are necessary.

"In transgressing and lying against
the LORD, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt,
conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood. And judgment is
turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the
street, and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from
evil maketh himself a prey: and the LORD saw it, and it displeased him that
there was no judgment." Isaiah 59:13-15.