I'd prefer that we still change the spec as proposed in the original ISSUE-147 Change Proposal [1] to make it clear that the user agent might not support the requested rate. Therefore I am not currently willing to withdraw that Change Proposal for ISSUE-147.
I do agree that adding a metric object should be a separate Last Call issue. Is someone going to file a separate bug for this requirement?
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0113.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Silvia Pfeiffer [mailto:silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:23 AM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: Ian Hickson; Frank Olivier; HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-147
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Would you object to adding a metrics feature such as you describe at a later date rather than as part of issue 147?
>
> If we got agreement to do this how would it impact the change proposals on the table?
As an answer to this: I'd be happy to retract my change proposal.
Cheers,
Silvia.