Guardian: "Britain seeks u-turn over Iraq bombing"

From: "Iman HK" <iman_hk@DELETETHIShotmail.com>

Subject: Guardian: "Britain seeks u-turn over Iraq bombing"

Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 17:59:16 -0800

I apologize for sending so many articles, but the following seems
interesting. According to an article published in The Guardian on 8
January, 2001, the British administration is considering proposing to the US
government to cease the bombing of targets in Iraq's southern "no-fly" zone.
http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,419224,00.html
Britain seeks u-turn over Iraq bombing
Ewen MacAskill and Richard Norton-Taylor
The British government, in a policy u-turn, is to propose to the incoming US
administration that the bombing of targets over southern Iraq should be
stopped. British and US planes have enforced no-fly zones along Iraq's
northern and southern borders since 1992. In the past two years alone, they
have dropped more than 100 bombs, mainly against Iraqi air defences.
The bombing, in what is sometimes called the "forgotten war", has led to an
unknown number of civilian casualties. Hans von Sponek, the former UN
humanitarian coordinator, writing in the Guardian last week, said that 144
civilians had died in the no-fly zones because of the bombing.
The two no-fly zones were imposed by the US and Britain after the Gulf war
in what was described as a humanitarian effort to protect the Shi'ites in
the south of Iraq and Kurds in the north.
However, they are not backed by any UN security council resolution and do
not include flights by Iraqi helicopters. Iraq is now flying civilian
aircraft over the zones.
The official British line is that there are no plans to change the approach
to Iraq and that British foreign policy is determined independently of the
US. In the Guardian last week, Peter Hain, the Foreign Office minister,
strongly defended the no-fly zone policy.
But in reality, the whole of US-British policy towards Iraq is under review
as a result of the impending arrival of a new US administration. Among the
top foreign policy issues the new president, George W Bush, will have to
contend with is how to deal with the renewed confidence of the Iraqi
dictator, Saddam Hussein.
Mr Bush is expected to take a tough line, given that his father was
president at the time of the Gulf war and that his secretary of state, Colin
Powell, commanded the Allied forces. Gen Powell has spoken of the need to
"re-energise" US policy towards Iraq.
But only Britain and the US remain enthusiastic about maintaining sanctions
and France, among others, has criticised the continued bombing of southern
Iraq.
In an attempt to deflect criticism, the British government has been looking
behind-the-scenes at the introduction of so-called "smart" sanctions and an
end to the southern no-fly zone.
The no-fly zone was meant to counter Saddam Hussein's assault on the
southern Shi'ites by denying him air space. But the Iraqi campaign of
repression has effectively ended because the anti-Saddam opposition in the
towns and among the Marsh Arabs has been quelled.
The Ministry of Defence, which has spent more than £800m policing the zones,
is increasingly uneasy about the possibility of an RAF pilot going down, and
the bombing has led to public concern, especially after evidence that
victims have included civilians.
The British government is proposing to retain the no-fly zone in the north
because it argues the threat remains to the Iraqi Kurds.
Although ready to consider fresh policies, Britain does not intend to let up
on Saddam, seeing him as a serious threat to world stability.
Downing Street has been increasingly toying with the idea of switching from
a blanket ban that has exceptions to sanctions that specify a narrow band of
prohibited goods, mainly weapons.
UN reports have shown that the sanctions have resulted in a high civilian
death toll, especially among children.
Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said
yesterday a rethink of British and UN policy towards Iraq was "absolutely
necessary".
"Ten years of inertia is no substitute for effective policy," he said.
Also under consideration will be sanctions that target the regime more
effectively by trying to limit the ability to travel and hitting overseas
bank accounts, though such measures have proved difficult to achieve in the
past.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a discussion list run by the Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq
For removal from list, email soc-casi-discuss-request@lists.cam.ac.uk
Full details of CASI's various lists can be found on the CASI website:
http://www.casi.org.uk