Unfortunately for the people of the world everything is going according to the New World Order Plan. But what is this New World Order Plan? In a nutshell the Plan is this. The Dark Agenda of the secret planners of the New World Order is to reduce the world's population to a "sustainable" level "in perpetual balance with nature" by a ruthless Population Control Agenda via Population and Reproduction Control. A Mass Culling of the People via Planned Parenthood, toxic adulteration of water and food supplies, release of weaponised man-made viruses, man-made pandemics, mass vaccination campaigns and a planned Third World War. Then, the Dark Agenda will impose upon the drastically reduced world population a global feudal-fascist state with a World Government, World Religion, World Army, World Central Bank, World Currency and a micro-chipped population. In short, to kill 90% of the world's population and to control all aspects of the human condition and thus rule everyone, everywhere from the cradle to the grave.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Eph. 6:12

"The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed ..." Psalm 2:2

Modern Secret Societies, of which Freemasonry is the largest and most well known, profess to be "inclusive" such that all can join regardless of colour, creed or religion as long as they profess a belief in "god." Thus, they admit all sorts of men except atheists and so, in this sense, these secret associations are religious associations. This "inclusiveness" results in a mongrel and motley membership who perform in a mish-mash of worship, rites and rituals containing prayers to "god." Thus, to pander to the sensibilities of this multi-ethnic, multi-religious membership, the modern Secret Societies have endeavoured to establish mongrel forms acceptable to their adherents. Hence, many of the prayers and forms of worship of these secret religious associations are made amenable to the heathen, the infidel and irreligious. In fact, the authorised prayers within Freemason Lodges are Christless prayers as attested to by every authoritative Freemasonic manual. In the rare instance that impromptu Christian prayers are offered up in Freemasonic Lodges, by some godly man, then, this is done contrary to the spirit and express regulations of Freemasonry. The name of Christ is not only discouraged in prayer it is rigorously excluded from use in all Freemasonic rite, ritual and parlance. That is, the name of Christ and Christian prayers are not used or authorised by the Freemasonic authorities since they are contrary to the dark spirit that energises Freemasonry. The corollary of this is that the Freemason is taught that Christ is not only irrelevant but superfluous in his spiritual journey. That Christ is not the Great Redeemer of humanity and so the idea of pardon through the atonement of Christ -redemption through Grace- is never once presented in Freemasonic prayers. Instead, the Freemason is told that admission unto God's "everlasting kingdom" is merely a just reward of a "pious and virtuous life."

Secret associations may exist that do not make false claims, but false claims are invariably a consequent and constant companion of secrecy, especially habitual secrecy. That is because the object of secrecy is deception, especially by those who conceal their activities with the aim of taking advantage of the ignorance of others. Concerning Freemasons, the design of secrecy within their Craft is to take advantage of "a weakness in human nature," and to invest with a charm things which, if generally known, "would sink into disregard." Their routine resort to "the aid of the mysterious" to render their "meetings attractive," and to "stimulate applications for membership." Such are the outward reasons for the habitual secrecy generally practised by secret associations. That secrecy is the result of an unwillingness to rely upon real merit and the sober judgement of mankind for success, and of a desire, on the part of associations practising it, to pass for what they are not. Hence, the design of secrecy involves hypocrisy, or something very much like it. There are more sinister reasons for the habitual secrecy of these cults and groups, of which Freemasonry is the biggest and best known, but, whatever the grander design of this secrecy, on a prosaic level secret associations do make false claims.

The frequent boast of Freemasons and their ilk is that they are charitable institutions. That that "charity and hospitality" are the "distinguishing characteristics" of Freemasonry. A Freemason entering the Third Degree, the "Master Mason," at his initiation, is told that "Masonic charity is as broad as the mantle of heaven and co-extensive with the boundaries of the world": Or words to that effect. In fact, Freemasons and their kind make a great deal of this supposed charity and beneficence in their public pronouncements about themselves. They revel in the perceived perception that they are societies that are most generally known and commended by their "charities." Such is the self-glorification of the secret associations of which Freemasonry is the biggest and best known. This is an assiduously cultivated image and is a crucial part of the defence mechanism of Secret Societies. Secret associations that exclude the vast majority from their internal works and benefits need to placate the majority for fear of being attacked for what they do, and so, self-promotion as a beneficent force in society is an integral part of their defence stratagem. It is, therefore, are very self-serving charity offered by the Freemasons and their kind. The inner logic of the system of "charity" offered by Freemasonry is easily seen by contrasting it with the Command of Christ:

"Therefore, when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men." (Matt. 6:2)

Here, Christ alludes to the Scribes and Pharisees, whom he calls "hypocrites," who loudly and showily went about their works and who also put on an appearance of religion and holiness, but inwardly, and otherwise, were very wicked men. So venal were the Scribes and Pharisees that Christ used them as archetypes of wickedness. In this reference, Christ commands that far from making a display of charitable works lest it minister to spiritual pride as did the Scribes and Pharisees a man should give charity unconditionally and without fanfare. Similarly, the boasting of Secret Societies about their charities is precisely what Christ forbids and declares the characteristic of hypocrites. Further: such vain boasting is invariably a cover for something less noble and as such there is good reason to suspect that these claims are ill founded. Consequently, the very boasting of secret associations about their benevolence and charities is indicative that their claims to being charitable institutions are hypocritical and false.

However, these boasted "benefits" and much vaunted "charity" of Freemasonry and its kind are invariably restricted to their own members. In the "charge" delivered to a Master Mason at his initiation, he is enjoined to exercise benevolence toward "every true and worthy brother of the Order." Freemasons boast that no "worthy" Freemason who has ever sought "aid" has been "refused." However, even amongst their own kind this much vaunted "charity" is very conditional. Thus, we find that although aid may be given to cult members under certain circumstances (and their regulations make it very plain that relief is offered to none but members and their families) the conditions are such that they carefully exclude from membership of their cult all who need aid or are likely to need aid. Thus, the provisions and conditions found in the constitution or by-laws of almost every secret association that ensure selection of members that will, most likely, not place a future undue pecuniary burden on the organisation. Thus, Freemasonry, who boast and bluster about the "universal brotherhood of men" and "universal benevolence," according to its own Constitutions, will not accept as a member any man who is not "physically perfect." Accordingly, it excludes all who are diseased, infirm, blind, lame, maimed or who have no means of support. And so, the destitute, the widow, the orphan and the wretchedly poor are similarly excluded. And so are their own members who "are in arrears" deemed beyond the pale for receipt of the "benefits." The member "in arrears" is not entitled to any aid, for, it is only the "worthy brother" who is entitled to aid and in order to be a worthy brother a member must punctually pay his "dues." Thus, another justification for habitual secrecy of these associations: that it is necessary in order that aid may not be obtained by persons who are not members.

Furthermore, in the Freemasonic benefit system, the rich and the poor fare alike since the amount granted in all cases is the same. The constitutions of most secret societies that show a public face, such as Freemasonry, and which give aid to members, stipulate that amounts are constant and so do not correspond to the condition of the recipient. Moreover, relief afforded to members (in case of the sickness or death of a member, for instance) is not to be regarded as a charity but is to be regarded as a debt. The constitutions of other secret orders are keen to that the aid given to sick members is not to be regarded in any other light than as the payment of a debt. Thus, all money paid by the secret associations and cults for the relief of sick members is not considered charity but as the "just due of the sick." Consequently, such an arrangement it is argued does not "wound" or "insult the pride" of the receiver since "the relief extended is not of grace, but of right." Thus, the insistence upon "dues" and the punctuality on paying them. Since, the "worthy brother" who did not pay an equivalent via his "dues" would feel that they were not his just "due" but "alms" and so feel "degraded" at receiving benefits. This financial arrangement is, in a sense, akin to a mutual insurance company, where fixed contributions are made by members into a common fund from which only the members receive any aid. And of course, no monies are paid out of the common fund to those rigorously excluded from the Secret Societies; the diseased, the infirm, the destitute, the poor who "have no visible means of support."

In short: all those who are likely to need pecuniary aid and in most need of it. Thus, in another sense, the aid bestowed by Secret Societies, such as Freemasonry, is no more a gift of charity than the dividends paid out by an Incorporated company, PLC, or bank. Such that, as stockholders are entitled to their share of the profits then so are members of Secret Societies entitled to a certain share of the common funds to which they have contributed. Accordingly, the social benefit arrangements of these secret associations are at best indemnity policies for the benefit of a very select few. Consequently, these associations can be regarded as elite, mutual assurance groups, but, one thing they have no right to call themselves is a "charitable association." For, it is not charity when members of a mutual assurance group receive monies they are entitled to from a common fund, a certain portion of the funds which they themselves have contributed, while those who are in real want do not since they can not even become members. Moreover, notwithstanding the mean spirited, exclusive and selfish nature of these secret associations, one that then proceeds to call itself charitable not only deceives but also impostures. This self-glorification and fakery -these false claims to charity, universal brotherhood and benevolence - are necessary defences to deflect inquiring minds from real and proper study of the inner works of the Secret Societies. Charity is not conditional.

To the cultists initiated into the mindset of the Secret Societies, those who are not are regarded as "ignorant and prejudiced" people. These elitists regard the human majority as a unenlightened, profane, vulgar mass, an ignorant herd, and often call them "cattle" or "goyim." This contempt for the human majority, the uninitiated, is an aspect of pretentious character of the Secret Societies. On a mundane level this centres upon the arrogant claim that the Secret Societies are the possessors and propagators of all substantive truths, knowledge and morality. An arrogance that makes the cultist claim that a man can scarcely be good and intelligent without being "initiated" into the "Mysteries." Such arrogance that inspires Freemasons to claim unabashed that their cult "is not only the most ancient, but the most moral institution that ever subsisted" and other vain boasting in ad nauseam. The absurdity of these myriad claims is evident to every proper and inquiring mind.

The Occult Hierarchy who are the secret masters of the Secret Societies are responsible for the vain boasting of its underlings. This is so, because the near absolute control they have over their minions ensures that only sanctioned references to the inner workings of their dark empire are found in the writings and utterances of fellow cultists. Amidst these sanctioned references are the repeated claim that initiates into the "Ancient Mysteries" are a chosen breed, superior breed, a select few, who, by virtue of their initiation, are superior to the rest of mankind. Thus, the ostentation in the myriad rites, rituals, regalia, emblems, processions and parades, and the aggrandising, high-sounding titles, are all designed to impress their own members and outsiders with ideas of their excellence and grandeur. Thus, not only do the high-sounding titles involve the sin of profaneness but they also illustrate the pretentious character of the secret associations which use them. And the most obvious offender is Freemasonry, the biggest cult in the world, wherein almost every officer has some great title and almost every officer is a "Grand" man. And, since Freemasonry is the oldest and biggest of the modern secret association, their form, function and ostentation has been copied by many lesser associations recently evolved as kindergartens into the Mysteries. These modern, adjunct associations also have their high-sounding titles, rites, rituals and aprons and all too attempt by these and other bombast to recommend their associations as a grand affairs. To those not victim to the indoctrination of the Secret Societies such ostentation and parading is very strange indeed. Especially the tendency for laughable, high-sounding titles, that would be ridiculous when even applied to the greatest and best man that ever lived. However, although these shenanigans produce laughter and contempt in inquiring minds unaffected by the cult indoctrination of the Secret Societies there are very good reasons for them. These grand titles and other clap-trap things are not only designed to make these cults appear excellent and grand affairs but also to set up and maintain a strict hierarchy.

Secret Societies insist upon secrecy, silence and discretion in all things. However, one thing they are not shy or quiet about is their supposed"charity" and "charitable works."However, whatever largesse they practice, at best, it is in the form of an inferior kind of "mutual insurance society." Moreover, this does not elevate them into charitable institutions no matter how they attempt to present, dignify and parade their exclusive form of benevolence. In short: no matter how they parade their charities, Secret Societies are not truly charitable institutions, and so, charity has no need of them. In fact, until very recently, when the secret masters of the Secret Societies commanded that their organisations make a more public show of their selective benevolence, charity did not depend on them at all. The modern trend to trumpet their good works occurred at the time when suspicion was gaining ground that the Secret Societies present a grave threat to society and the sedition and venality of the organisations was again under scrutiny. Thus, the smokescreen of "good works," "charity," "charitable works" to deflect legitimate criticism or proper study of the phenomenon of the Secret Societies. Furthermore, Christ, who was the embodiment of Natural Moral Law and Natural Moral Order, commanded men to "do good unto all men" (Gal. 6:10) and "to remember the poor" (Gal. 2:10) but to do so without fanfare or boast. True charity is done without fanfare, parade or trumpet and those who carry out charitable works in such a humble, unassuming manner, as commanded by Christ, are matchless when measured against any of these orders, or even with all of them combined. In short: Charity does not depend on Secret Societies.

Leaving aside "what is done of them in secret," what can be gleaned from what is publicly known is that the contribution of Secret Societies to public or private morality is negligible. It is plain and frequent that they refuse the greater of humanity from admission and cut off aid to its own members. Further, that indoctrination into the mindset of the Secret Societies results in the narrowing of the moral soul of the initiate by substituting for love and obligations to mankind an attachment and duty to a Lodge, Sect or Order. An arrangement contained in the formula that membership in a Lodge, not character, is held to make one "worthy." Thus, such an arrangement may open the way to great favour, prosperity and society with the rarefied world of the Secret Societies but it does nothing to strengthen the fundamental supports of public and private morality. No matter what private morals are fostered within the clandestine world of the Secret Societies they are inconsistent with the universal common good. In short: Morality does not depend on Secret Societies.

Secret Societies, with their various mantras of "universal brotherhood," are Internationalist. They seek to dissolve all nations (by debasing all notions of nationhood and patriotism in the minds and hearts of everyone) such that their much anticipated World Government is established with the least opposition and according to their ancient agenda. Consequently, the Secret Societies employ indoctrination techniques that, among many other things, tend to destroy the concept of citizenship within the mind of the initiate by exalting the love of the Lodge or Order above the love of country. This originates in the supplanting of love and loyalty to the wider community and country with the blind loyalty to the Lodge reinforced by a variety of blood oaths. These blood oaths were not only devised to guarantee the habitual secrecy of Lodge activity but they were also oaths ofmutual personal protection. And it is these oaths of blind loyalty to the Lodge and mutual personal protection that are so corrosive to the concept of citizenship. For, the blind loyalty to Lodge and to Brother excludes these exalted ones from all proper and considered moral restraint but especially against restraint and due punishment when moral and criminal laws are broken. Thus, we find that in the courts of law, Freemason criminals (and there are a great many of these) are safe or safer before a Freemason judge and jury.

It is also common knowledge to the wise that in this corrupt, modern society one must be part of the Brotherhood to ensure equal standing and impartiality with others, in the courts and elsewhere. Society has indeed become so debased and it is a result in large measure to the corrosive influence of the Secret Societies and their shabby morality but, especially, because of the largest and most known, the Brotherhood called Freemasonry. The common boast among the Brotherhood concerning life's vagaries is that owing to the power of the Secret Societies, their ubiquity and their numerous placemen in all crucial parts of society, coupled with their blood oaths of mutual protection, they are a lot safer than non-Brethren. Further, they boast that even in times of war that they are much safer among the enemy than other captives if one of their kind is in some position of power and influence. Such boasting is obviously testament to the arrogance born of moral corruption but it also is a confession that the ties of the Lodge or Order are stronger and more felt than those for wider society and country and so is inconsistent with a proper love of community and country. the shabby morality of the Secret Societies coupled with their ancient agenda for World Empire render them inimical to patriotism and inconsistent with it. In short: Patriotism has no need of Secret Societies.

The Secret Societies boast great antiquity and claim they are carriers of an ancient wisdom they call the Ancient Mysteries or the Secret Doctrine. This is indeed the case. They also claim that this ancient wisdom, this gnosis, is the one true source of divine revelation and so the only true route to godhead. This, however, is NOT the case. The ancestors of the modern secret society were the Mystery Schools that were initiation centres using a form of spiritual enlightenment called Gnosticism. At this time, it was the only means of human interaction with the spiritual hierarchies and the only route into godhead. However, human consciousness evolved and this method become so dangerous that it caused the death of the initiate. Consequently, the Mystery Schools fell into disuse and disrepute such that, although they had been a great source of Good, they become corrupted and debased and became the main vehicle of Evil in the historical process. The Incarnation of Christ and the Mystery at Golgotha when the Christ Impulse was released into Creation was the most fateful event since Creation itself and was the Divine mechanism whereby humanity was saved from the spiritual abyss and the traps laid for it by Evil. Subsequently, there existed two opposing organisations energised by two opposing Principles that became vehicles for them within the historical process: The true Apostolic Christian Church that is the vehicle of the Christ Impulse and the debased Mystery Schools that evolved into the modern Secret Societies, which is the vehicle of Evil. The true Apostolic Christian Church is that Church established by Christ and contains the pristine message of Christ and the inspired wisdom of the Apostles. It is the true Church that is "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1Tim. 3:15) such that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matt. 16:18). The true Church that embodies the preaching of Christ and the Wisdom and the Power of God unto Salvation. In short: Religion has no need of Secret Societies.

Together with the nuclear family, CHARITY, MORALITY, PATRIOTISM and RELIGION are the social cement by which civil society is made concrete and viable. Thus, since certainly the FAMILY has no need of them, and not one of CHARITY, MORALITY, PATRIOTISM and RELIGION imposes obligations on a sovereign citizen to join them, Secret Societies are superfluous to civil society. In conclusion, the moral character of SECRECY and of the SECRET SOCIETIES that employ it habitually is such that they are not only superfluous to an open, civic society but are also inconsistent, inimical and hostile to it.

There are times when it is right and proper for an individual to employ secrecy and so there are times when associations, societies, unions and combinations are similarly justified, morally, in its use. Just as boards of trust and legislative bodies rightfully resort to secret sessions, if the state of affairs demands it, then there is a case for associations to use secrets and secrecy in certain circumstances. Thus, in certain circumstances, secret societies of both kinds may resorted to secrecy for good ends. At such perilous times, for instance, when society itself is imperilled by wickedness and evil. Thus, Secret Societies may be rightfully resorted to for common council and united action during extraordinary times such as when the body politic, the commonwealth, is in a very dangerous state and it is imperative to resist incumbent evils. At such extraordinary times and during uncommon conditions the existence of such societies acting to oppose evil by working for the common good should not be disclosed. Consequently, there are times when secret associations are rightfully resorted to as a means of united and concentrated action against organised evil.

Similarly, it is not sinful to resort to secrecy if, by resisting moral evil, it brings advantage to the strategies of an association or combination when resisting government corruption, vice and crime and so bring succour to wider society. Since it is the duty of all men to resist Evil. Secrecy is justified and demanded by peculiar circumstances or obvious ends to be gained. However, it is no the case to resort to secrecy, and especially habitual secrecy, where no such justification can be made for it. The nature of truth and right is openness and all things tend to it. Moreover, within Natural Moral Law there is nothing covered or concealed that shall not finally be proclaimed. Thus, in the affairs of men, Natural Moral Law favours openness and open action. Consequently, when secrecy, and especially habitual secrecy, is used without reason or when it is made the basis of false pretences or assumes the existence of something that is not, then it is not defensible. That is: habitual secrecy, the lifeblood of the Secret Societies, transgresses Natural Moral Law, which renders it inimical to Natural Moral Order.

The propensity for evil is greatly encouraged and amplified by secrecy. Evil is an inevitability when habitual secrecy is involved since it acts as a magnet for the evil minded and those who seek advantage over their fellow men. Thus, throughout history men have frequently associated for wrong; to combine in groups, in deepest secrecy, and prey on the community. Such people as assassins, gangsters, counterfeiters, blackmailers and burglars often associate to carry out their criminal enterprises. So, too, secret associations may combine for selfish ends that derogate the common rights of the social order. Such as when they conceal the crimes of their members or when a Brother in the judiciary fails to administer justice to a fellow, criminal Brother when it is demanded by the law. Or when they interfere with the management of churches and other societies to bring them into accordance with their cultish beliefs. Or when they bring undue influence and intimidation to bear on public men. Or when they disseminate false religious and moral principles. Or when they co-operate for political ends and organise political assassinations and effect revolutions. It is these iniquities that are the grist to the mill of the dark machinations of the Secret Societies.

When proper study of History is carried out, the astute researcher will come to the conclusion that there is only one view of it. That nothing happens by accident, that everything occurs for a purpose and that hidden hands operate behind the scenes. Moreover, that Secret Societies exist that are the power structures used to bring about social change via moral and spiritual corruption, assassinations, sedition and revolutions. This is the Conspiratorial View of History and it is the only view the proper student of History should hold. Moreover, the proper student of History will soon discover that, far above the petty criminality of disparate groups that have throughout history resorted to secrecy to carry out their crimes, there exists an organisation of unparalleled power concretised in the dark Empire of the Secret Societies. Further, that there is an organising, supernatural mind, behind it, energising it, that uses the Secret Societies and their habitual secrecy, to bring about great social changes in accordance with its Will. This "Will" is the ancient agenda for World Empire manifest in the myriad aspects of the assault on Natural Moral Order, on Western civilisation and on Christianity, orchestrated by the secret masters of the Secret Societies.

In short: although at times it is right and proper for secret associations to resort to secrecy in the defence of of the moral well-being of society or to fight organised Evil, modern Secret Societies who routinely resort to habitual secrecy, transgress Natural Moral Law, which renders them inimical to Natural Moral Order, and so, morally indefensible.