It's been a while since I configured my wireless router, but I'm on a
home setup probably with the usual NAT tomfoolery :-)
73, Bruce
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Wouter Weggelaar <wouterweg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Same here, no luck sending data.
> Bruce, do you maybe have a direct outside IP? I'm behind a NAT.
>> Wouter PA3WEG
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mark L. Hammond <marklhammond at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, I still don't have it forwarding packets, according to their webpage.
>>>> What is the delay from time of packets submitted to posted on the web? Seconds/minutes/hours?
>>>> Looking harder here, but it sure looks like Windows firewall is set to allow JAVA to do it's thing...
>>>> Bruce, how did you tell Win7 firewall to use JAVA? Did it pop up a security window for you to enable traffice? I don't remember seeing that, but this isn't the first JAVA thing I've done...Win7 firewall settings show java.exe and javaw.exe enabled for both TCP and UDP traffic.
>>>> Bleh.
>>>> Mark N8MH
>>>>>> At 08:20 AM 2/16/2012 -0400, Bruce Robertson wrote:
>>>I sent packets yesterday with this email address, and then registered
>>>in the evening. This morning I see that it has retrospectively counted
>>>those packets to my new account! The only authorization I had to do
>>>with the software was to tell my Win7 firewall that java could connect
>>>to the internet on my behalf.
>>>>>>So the system seems quite robust (not to mention pleasing to the eye).
>>>>>>73, Bruce
>>>VE9QRP
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Mark L. Hammond
>>><marklhammond at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Okay, I had a brain failure here (least I think so...)
>>>>>>>> I used my gmail address to register my station on the webpage, but used my amsat address when the program started. I registered online weeks ago, so when the registration page came up, I didn't even consider that it was supposed to "match" to the website registration page.
>>>>>>>> Will know tomorrow, but that has to be my problem.
>>>>>>>> Makes sense...another "duh" moment :)
>>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>>> Mark N8MH
>>>>>>>> At 05:13 PM 2/15/2012 -0500, Mark L. Hammond wrote:
>>>>>FYI: I have sent a couple hundred packets in, and they don't show...
>>>>>>>>>>Mark N8MH
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andy Kellner <hawat1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Looks like the Masat team updated / fixed their website, too.
>>>>>> Now when you go to the 'track our satellite' section, it actually shows the position
>>>>>> of the satellite and - more importantly - the 'Packets Received' from each registered
>>>>>>>>>>>> Amateur station ! So now you can check if the packet upload is actually working.
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://cubesat.bme.hu/en/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good stuff. Nicely Done, Masat team.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andreas - VK4HHH
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>>>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>Mark L. Hammond [N8MH]
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>>>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>>>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb>>>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com>>>> _______________________________________________
>> Sent via AMSAT-BB at amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
--
http://ve9qrp.blogspot.com