On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:35 PM, John Dorsey <haskell at colquitt.org> wrote:
> Once it's installed and working, GHC's a very decent compiler.
My general null hypothesis is, as Alec Baldwin put it, that a loser is
a loser, or a buggy project is buggy.
If GHC is robust overall (which I'm yet to find out), why is the
installation so broken?