Even when one assumes the Cantor diagonalization is to be applied to ists of binary numerals instead lists of of arbitrary binary sequences, there are well known ways of avoiding the dual representation problem.

Which Ross has seem often enough s that he should be familiar with them, unless his memory is faulty.> > > So Ross is, as usual, in over his head.> >> >> > No. Why are you trying to bait and switch instead of simply> acknowledging that particular lambast was mistaken?

As I am referring to the original Cantor argument rather than any of the later modifications of it as Ross is doing, it is Ross who is doing a bait and switch.