Post navigation

Who’s No. 1?

My collegue Gerry Gittelson wondered that aloud in today’s paper in a column discussing who’d win if Canyon and Oaks Christian squared off in a game to really settle area supremacy.

Personally, I don’t think that question is focused enough. If you ask who’d win the game if it were played next week, I’d have to say Canyon because Oaks just isn’t the same team without Marc Tyler in the backfield.

But if this was just some hypothetical match-up, I’d go with Oaks. When Tyler was in the lineup, Oaks was one of the best football teams you’ll ever see. If you tried to stop Clausen, Tyler would kill you. If you tried to bottle up Tyler, Clausen would pick you apart.

Marshall Jones did an admirable job filling in for Tyler. He’s a fantastic athlete with good instincts at running back. But those instincts aren’t nearly as developed as Tyler’s were. They never had to be with Tyler as Oaks’ RB.

Saturday was the first time I’d seen Oaks since Tyler was lost for the year with a broken fibula. I barely recognized them. Seriously, it was like a shell of the team I’d seen before. The well-tuned offense needed some oil. Everything looked out of sync. Yes, Clausen had a bad game. But remember, he was trying to throw into a secondary with eight defenders. Even when Oaks had four WRs, every single guy was double-teamed.

Cardinal Newman was only able to do that because Tyler wasn’t there. There’s no way you go with three pass rushers if the No. 1 running back in the country is in the backfield.

Canyon is a much better team that Cardinal Newman, so frankly, if the teams played now and Oaks didn’t have Tyler, it might not even be close.

But if we’re just theoretically speaking and both teams are at their best, I’d go with Oaks, 35-27.

Please note that the Canyon defense stopped Valencia’s Shane Vereen, Hart’s Delano Howell, Rio Mesa’s Malachi Lewis, and stopped Moorpark’s Darrel Scott, TWICE! All are Divsion I top prospects. The Canyon defense swarmed all comers this season. I don’t think these boys cared who was carrying the ball for the opposition. They only cared he didn’t want to try it again.

im 16 in 12 grade

And lets not forget Jimmy Clausen will be 20 years old in 3 weeks. what a joke of a team, I mean come on 20 years old in high school,. hes playing 14 15 16 17 and maybe 18 year old boys,,

T Carr

I agree, the game to see would be Orange and Canyon.
Oaks Christian is a very good team, but they do not have a chance with Tyler out.
Over rated Clausen showed he can not stand up against the top High School players.
I believe USC got lucky when he decided on N.D.

Meta

Comments Policy

We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.

If you see comments that you find offensive, please use the “Flag as Inappropriate” feature by hovering over the right side of the post, and pulling down on the arrow that appears. Or, contact our editors by emailing moderator@langnews.com.