Jim Amsden wrote:
> This will require ACLs on individual properties,
Nope. The backpointer update doesn't have to pass through the same code path as
PROPPATCH; it can call directly into the code that PROPPATCH calls, but bypass the
ACL check.
>> I don't believe that has to be a problem. The ACLs can be set up so that they
>> specifically permit the backpointer property to be updated by the server.
>
--
/====================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported |
|Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================|
|Netscape Comm. Corp. |The good are innocent and create justice.|
|francis@netscape.com |The bad are guilty, and invent mercy. |
\====================================================================/
New area code for work number: 650