On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like
>>> to know.
>>
>> It doesn't take much to check that GNOME pulls in GNOME Documents!
>
> Oh, really?
>
> Look at the subject and then review my first post ;-)
I knew your first post but I thought that you'd forgotten it...
You're disagreeing with the GNOME developers installing Tracker by
default (whatever the actual dependency chain is).
It's their right and their choice; and, in their view, having Tracker
by default in GNOME enhances their DE.
It's also your right to disable/remove/replace Tracker (one method
that I haven't mentioned before is "equivs"; it's more work but it's
another possibility) should you choose to do so.