I see it pretty clear when it says the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. I believe the public should have access to the same weapons that the majority of the soldiers have access to. And before anyone goes off saying anything about nukes or missiles your average soldier doesn't have access to those. Some do but the majority doesn't. We as a people need to be equally matched with the force that a tyrannical government would use against us.

Please we do not own Assault Weapons. That is when talking about AR-15s and AKM-47 semi auto sporting arms. Why would a common semi auto rifle be banned? Not likely they have been around for 100 years.

There is a reason the media has labeled black rifles as "Assault Rifle", they don't know that AR stands for Armalite Rifle.

I was trained by the military on the AR platform rifle. The military rely on the AR rifle to protect their assests and compounds. I have the right to protect my assests and compound in the same manner.

__________________
Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

lets see,.............how do i view it? simple! any and all gun control laws, bans or restrictions ever passed from day one are an infringement, there for they are unconstitutional. and any new gun control laws, bans or restrictions are further infringement.