Walter L. Larimore, MD, was in the private group practice of Family Medicine for almost 20 years prior to moving to Colorado Springs in February 2001 to become Vice-President of Medical Outreach at Focus on the Family.

After receiving his MD from Louisiana State University in New Orleans in 1977, he completed a General Practice Teaching Fellowship at Queen's Hospital in Nottingham, England, and his Residency in Family Medicine at Duke University Medical Center. He practiced four years in the rural Smoky Mountains of Appalachia before moving to Florida in 1985. He co-founded Heritage Family Physicians with Dr. John Hartman in 1988.

Dr. Larimore is a Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians and has been a member of the Olympic Sports Medicine Society and a Charter member of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine. In 1996, Dr. Larimore was awarded the Thomas Johnson Award by the American Academy of Family Physicians as America's Outstanding Family Practice Educator.

Hormonal Contraceptives

Ethical Issues Regarding Oral Contraceptives

A Physician's Commentary about Post-Fertilization Effects

I have prescribed "the Pill" since 1978. My wife and I used the Pill for years, having no moral concerns about it. Then,
in 1995 my friend and practice partner John Hartman, MD, showed me a patient information brochure--given to him
by a friend--that claimed the Pill had a postfertilization effect causing "...the unrecognized loss of preborn children." John asked me if I had ever heard of such a thing. I had not. I did read the brochure and its claims seemed to be outlandish, excessive, and inaccurate. So, I decided to begin a literature search to disprove these claims to my partner, myself, and any patients who might ask about it.

The more research I did, the more concerned I became about my findings. I
called researchers around the country and interviewed them. During this process I met Joe Stanford, MD. Joe volunteered to assist in the research that ultimately became this systematic review. We were concerned enough about our findings and about the fact that so many of our colleagues and patients seemed to share our ignorance about this potential effect that we presented the preliminary results of our research at a number of research forums, just to see if we were off base. Most of the reviewers suggested that, although this evidence was new to them (as it was to us), it seemed accurate and not off target. Furthermore, several said that they thought it would change the way family physicians informed their patients about the Pill and its potential effects.

The most difficult part of this research was deciding how to apply it to my practice. I discussed it with my partners, my patients, ethicists I know and respect, and pastors in my community. I studied the ethical principle of double effect and discussed the issue with religious physicians of several faiths.
Finally, after many months of debate and prayer, I decided in
1998 to no longer prescribe the Pill. As a family physician, my career has been committed to family care from conception to death. Since the evidence indicated to me that the Pill could have a postfertilization effect, I felt I could no longer, in good conscience, prescribe it--especially since viable alternatives are available. The support and encouragement that my partners, staff, and patients have given me has been unexpectedly affirming. It seems that my patients have appreciated the information I have given them. Many have been surprised or even shocked (as I was) to learn about this potential effect. Many of my patients have chosen to continue taking the Pill, and we have physicians in our practice and community who will
prescribe it for them. Patients who take the Pill tell me that they are much more careful with their compliance. Others have chosen other birth control options--especially one of the modern methods of natural family planning. So, this is research that has changed my soul and my practice. It has been an extraordinarily difficult issue with which I have had to wrestle. I suspect it will be so for many who thoughtfully read and consider the evidence contained in this review.