Scratch that. Katy Perry and John Mayer are walking in COLD air! The two lovuhs were seen bundling up from the freezing NYC chill last night after dining at French chef Jean Georges’ restaurant ABC Kitchen in Manhattan!

Ooh la la!

That’s the kind of place you ask a girl to marry you at!

Soooo…any news you two would like to share with us??

Sorry, Perezcious readers. The engagement we’re all waiting for has yet to happen. There’s still no rock on KatyKat’s left hand.

Buuuut, John looks kind of adorable in those glasses, right?

Maybe he’s wearing them so he can see all the details in the diamond ring he’ll be buying soon!

Go with a princess cut, Johnny boy. That’ll make Katy roar with delight!

13 comments to “Katy Perry & John Mayer Fill Up On Food And Love On A Romantic NYC Date!”

In every picture I have seen of her and John Mayer together, she looks so unhappy. Is she trying to act like Victoria Beckham? There is a real disconnect in her public persona and candid photographs that is off- putting.

Re: hadleyk – Are you serious? Hahaha. Actually they do look alright right there, the way they're dressed, but she looks pissed right off… I tend to not think it was anything to do with a photographer, because these pop girls crave that kind of thing, so WTF? Are they actually dating or is it PR? She's got all the money in the world. If she's unhappy about something like her popularity at this moment… it's time to back away, disappear and let it all fade away. That's what's gonna happen. Some people will probably always listen to her music, but it's probably all downhill from here on career-wise.

HEY PERRY! OR any of you pop tarts… you tell me straight up truthfully what happened, and if it turns out you were not the root of it, or even helped me out in some positive way without me knowing, you got a friend forever, no strings attached, here. If it's what I think it is, just forget it, and understand why I say hateful things. I mean them, but it's venting, it's as far as I'll take it, and it's not really that big of a deal compered to the other ass I've kicked. You should've known it would absolutely fuck some things up. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think so.

I just find it odd when they say that they had a romantic dinner date in NYC two nights in a row and it is pretty clear that you can see Ricky Van Veen in the background in one of the shots. So you bring your "buddy" along for your dates now? This just reeks of desperation and a PR stunt. If they are in love and secretly planning something, why were the paps called in to take photographs of them leaving the restaurant? Just saying. ODD.

Re: HappyDaze – They don't smile for paps. That's deliberate on their part. More interesting is the question, what is wrong with your boundaries and psyche that you could actually be "off put" by whether or not strangers decide to smile at cameras when they go out on a private date.

Here's the thing people. These two are balancing entertainment careers, family, getting new projects going etc. The fact that they make time for each other (fly to where the other is should be enough to help you understand this fact - when a couple is bonding, they seek each other out and sleep together (and I mean sleep, w/ snoring) that is one of the elements, another would be having a child, another would be putting their partner before all others. FE: He fell off the stage and was taken to the ER, She cancels concert and goes to the ER. She places Him above 10,000+ concert goers. That example is the forsake all others ideal. Priorities realign.

In people who feel a real connection with each other, it shows in their body language over time. It's as simple as that. You can't judge by one picture, or even a couple pictures, but in a series of pictures over time it shows. Whether they choose to smile or hold hands or not, is irrelevant. Small details in body language will speak. And it does not speak for a deep connection with these two. As much as people want it to, it doesn't. I'm not saying they won't get married, though. It happens all the time.

Excuse me nay-sayers, they are trying to stay NEUTRAL for the paps. $$$$$
I agree 100% with what Kates_K9_Malinois said. Now, whether they make it up to the altar, only time will tell. In the meantime, there's always cohabitation whenever possible.

Re: Susan – You just don't get it and that is ok. Who do you think pays Perez to publish these stories? How do you think that the paps know where they are dining at? If they wanted to be private? …trust me you would never EVER see them together.

Re: Tori Winters – Bullshit! That is not how it works. JM and KP do not have control over the whole media world and are not able to control information to millions of people that they can just decide what is written about them. You put a lot of trust in greedy paparazzi media who are driven only by profit. There is no oversight of paps and they do not exercise moral integrity to be truthful or fair or unhurtful. The media can take a picture, make up any ridiculous interpretation of the picture they want and you seem to buy it. What the hell difference does it make to you if a couple goes out by themselves or go out with some friends? Your whole interpretation is made up. I could say, "Geez, they must have gone out with friends because it's easier to find little green men under the carpet." That is as valid as your "analysis" of the situation.

A new Bill Cosby accuser's story of how he allegedly sexually assaulted her after drugging her drink is horrifying.

According to Patricia, -- who decided to keep her last name anonymous -- Bill invited her to a dinner party in 1978 after they met at a conference... a dinner party that ended up just being the two of them: