The 2011-2012 report states that Planned Parenthood received $542.4 million in government health services grants and reimbursements, which it states includes payments from Medicaid managed care plans.

These are the same pieces of(Well you know what word I will use to describe them) who pretend to give a damn about the dead kids in CT..these bastards seem very gleeful at the fact that they have MURDERED hundreds of thousands of children..sickening..I wouldnt want to be them when they meet their maker

“I bet a disproportionately large percentage of these murdered babies were black.”

That is why some white Americans voted for Barack Obama; it can’t be racist if the Executioner-in-Chief is (half) black. The race issue is the primary reason I do not believe abortion will ever be outlawed in this country; it is a very targeted policy, and given the fact that Hispanics have passed blacks in population, one that is working as planned.

I would argue that the proliferation of abortion in the USA is one reason why we have been forsaken by God. God cannot be happy with us. What is the freedom of an individual who is murdered before he or she is even born?

You’ve got that right! I am sick and tired of these fools using the CT shooting to push agenda after agenda and then to stay silent about those who do not even have a voice to cry out as they are murdered within the womb. I have have had it!!!!!!!!!!! They are all pathetic pukes that deserve everything that is coming!!!!!!!

Thanks, but I wish I was wrong. In my neighborhood the pregnant teens are white, and they still have to go to black neighborhoods to kill the babies. On a positive note, as babies become more rare (as men wizen up to the system stacked against them), I believe fewer people will want to butcher their own.

Whenever I hear a libtard talk about how there has to be gun control because “No more children can die at the hands of a gun” I say “Well you don’t mind the millions of babies being murdered every year” and they say “Oh that’s different, thats a woman making a choice” oh really..well Adam Lanza made a choice too, he chose to get up that morning, drive to a school and murder innocent children..murder is murder PERIOD..either by the hands of a psychopath or by the hands of an abortion doctor MURDER IS MURDER..but the way the liberal mind works, if your a mother who wants to kill your unborn baby its OK since its their “choice”

I can’t even have a civil conversation with a lib about this issue. It is so blatantly obvious that abortion is murder. They describe an unborn child as a fetus, yet when a lib women carries her own unborn child, I have yet to hear them refer to it as a fetus...they always call it their unborn baby. I am tired of the double standard...Murder is Murder!

I am all for newspapers to publish the names of women who have had abortions..but you know that will never happen..I have always wondered why women who love abortion SO much have themselves never been aborted..I think many abortion lovers wish they were aborted

Well, of course, so-called "progressives" insist upon, and fund, the agency which enables them to carry out their impossible scheme to "fundamentally transform" America into European-style socialism. The following late-1800's writer summarizes the reasons:

"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics. I.44 "I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classesthe class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'? I.45 "I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal lifeimperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive stridesbroadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so. I.46 "Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove."

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.