Apparently, a school administrator in Portland said in an interview (about a new anti-oppression-ish program in the school district, I think?) that using pb&j as an example of something in class might not be culturally relevant for kids whose families are from, say, Somalia or Mexico because they might not eat pb&j in their homes. From what I've read, I can't tell if she is making a valid point about questioning mainstream cultural assumptions and her comments are being misconstrued, or if her take away from anti-oppression training was "omg, pb&j is racist!" or something between those two options.