Sunday, 17 April 2016

A simple message for immigration status-whores

The current migrant crisis invasion of Europe makes life great for the virtue signalling status whores of the Left. In the comfort of their leafy suburbs and academic cloisters they incur neither physical nor intellectual discomfort. By the latter I mean that they don't have to address the practical ramifications of their hectoring.

Their position deems any rejection of migrants as a Bad Thing. This is evidenced by heart-rending pictures of starving women and children (it's considered rude to mention that about 80% of the invaders are fighting-age men) offset against a wealthy and selfish West. What's never addressed is the subject of limits. And that's because once you concede the need for limits in principle - even if some time in the far off future - you've blown away the 'just let them in' argument. In essence you're acknowledging that immigration must be based on a range of practical criteria.

Heresy!

But even the Swedes have been forced to face up to the implications and are now using heat imaging technology to detect invaders crossing their borders while admitting they'll need to expel more than 80,000 of those they so smugly allowed in. So I suggest asking a simple question of any status-whore you need to interact with: Do you agree that there should be no limits to the numbers taken in? If not you admit that there's a need for an immigration policy. And if you agree with that you agree that immigrants pursue the approved channels. So let's start by shipping all of those rescued migrants back to the country they set out from.

The IT is running open door pleas by various celebs and politicians every 2-3 days. Fintan Drury and Barry Andrews were the last two psychic drivers. Commenters here should join the hammer attack on them. With cookies disabled there is unlimited access. Use 10minutemail.com to open a few sock accounts and let rip.

Some Jews are intolerant of gays. We can only hope this doesn't lead to anti-semitism in the gay community.

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35978328

I own my religion. I'll always be Jewish - it's part of my identity, just like anything else is. I have even invented a word for it. They have ultra-Orthodoxy and modern Orthodoxy. But I call it honest Orthodoxy. I don't know, maybe in 40 years' time it will be a movement.

Maybe they'll be honest enough to talk about the anti-gentile genocide in the Talmud.

In feminism studies, rape has nothing to do with sex, it's about power. (It is usually cited that grannies get raped, so it's not as if the rapists fancy them. It's an act of violence against them and a demonstration of male power). Therefore a man, who engages in sex with a woman without explicit consent, could be asserting his power in an act that is "by it's nature" violent. Ooops. And if there is drink involved, then consent cannot be given. Cos drink and sex never co-exist. Ever.

So seen through "problematic glasses", it actually makes sense that immigrant rapists are not really held to account. Immigrants are victims in Critical Theory's hierarchy of victimhood. They are not privy to White Male Privilege (which is the standard power driver in rape). Plus on account of their non-Whiteness, they have a stronger V-card than a White woman. So when they rape White women, it is an "attempt" at power. It is not an assertion of their power.

There is a twisted logic to it. It's is of course nonsense, but this is the kind of thinking that has a "trickle-down" effect into ordinary classrooms and MSM.

Hence the Norwegian dude who feels sorry for the Somalian who raped him. "Take the high road" and pretend that the other person is to be pitied. It's the same sort of nonsense that gets peddled in schools here: pity the bully.

Some teacher I know told me a while back about a student who was being bullied and she gave the student the usual spiel about the bully being a victim and she should actually feel sorry for the bully (since the bully must have a f**ked up homelife to be lashing out). After me telling her that she would have been better off mentoring the student on how to maintain boundaries with the bully with useful techniques e.g. call them out on what they are at every time they do it, loudly so everyone hears; enlisting back up - never be on their own with the bully; "tell them they need professional help" etc. Also it would be helpful for them to understand why the bully picked on them. Sometimes it's jealousy, Sometimes it's because they sense the person has weak emotional boundaries. Sometimes because they sense the person is isolated. Sometimes they see a trait/condition in the other person that they have themselves but cannot accept. Anyhow the teacher did a 180 and said: "Actually, why are we teaching them to pity the bully? It IS crazy".

The entire name thing is wrong for those who are majestically referred to as being Social Justice Warriors [SJW]. I suspect that is a name chosen by them for themselves. It should be abandoned and trashed among our people. Those ding-a-lings of the left (or on the "right" as the case sometimes is) actually are those who are seeking for higher social status among their deluded peers.

At best they should be referred to as being SSW's [social status warriors] or as SSC's [social status chumps (cucks)]. Let's please abandon lofty names for such injurious and self-important dunces who operate to the detriment of all people, but especially our own, in supporting movements for a great number of masses who are deserving of no support at all, and who are certainly not deserving of being wined and dined inside our own countries even as they trash and criticize the customs and laws of our people while receiving undeserved assistance. The leftists see that the SSC's are assisting alliances designed to break our people and our power within our own countries, even when so many of the cucked SSC's do not - or refuse to see.

The SSC's are actually double-cucks in that they cannot see or understand that they are being used by the same groups of leftists who are both creating the "immigration" and also creating the conditions which cause that "immigration" to occur. Their eyelids phase over when confronted with any factual evidence because their social status has become so important to preserve.

"And the results of that heinous endeavour have been catastrophic. Some estimates hold that four million Middle Easterners have died as a result of US-led wars and interventions in the region since 1990.[3] Countless millions more have been made into destitute refugees, and the wars have spawned millions of orphans too."--------"However, one “solution” to this problem that the elite [Flanders - Another word which should be abandoned - there is nothing "elite" about traitors except their treachery] are fully onside with is the resettlement of millions of refugees and other economic migrants from the Middle East and Africa into Europe. In a typical problem, reaction, solution scenario, the corporate and Zionist string pullers ruling the West have used the current synthetic crisis in the Middle East to forward their long-term plan to ethnically displace (and replace) the indigenous peoples of Europe in the furtherance of globalism."----------"White Europeans are targets in Europe, where masses of Muslim, Arab and African immigrants and refugees are being wielded as pawns to further the Kalergi plan of White displacement and genocide. But at the same time, White Westerners are being manipulated to make incessant war and terrorism against Arab/Muslim societies and regimes that come into conflict with imperial Israel and do not bow to the whims of international finance capitalism, aka globalism."

The entire name thing is wrong for those who are majestically referred to as being Social Justice Warriors [SJW]. I suspect that is a name chosen by them for themselves. It should be abandoned and trashed among our people. Those ding-a-lings of the left (or on the "right" as the case sometimes is) actually are those who are seeking for higher social status among their deluded peers.

Flanders, I have never once been misunderstood when referring to these creeps as "Social Justice Warriors." I have made no secret of my contempt for them any more than when I refer to niggers as "Micro-Einsteins" or "Enrichers".

But, having said that, I do feel that the correct term for these poseurs should be SSW's or "Social Status Whores" ... for, in the end, that is all they really are.

The Intellectual Death of “Anti-Semitism”—Interview with Jewish Writer and Novelist Gerard Menuhin (Part I)

Alexis: You quote Albert Einstein in your book saying that “I believe German Jewry owes its continued existence to anti-Semitism.”[2] It seems that he was aware that the word “anti-Semitism” was being used as an ideological weapon to beat the Goyim over the head because no serious person wants to be called an anti-Semite. Can you expand on that for us?

Menuhin: That depends on one’s definition of a serious person. Is a serious person one who has some position in society or in academia or government — therefore regarded as an ‘expert’, worthy of respect — which they might lose if they don’t adhere to political correctness? Or is a serious person one who has the ability and takes the time to formulate his own opinion about a particular subject, unaffected by the opinions of others?

Unfortunately for the Jews who can least afford it, once one has begun to research the topic, one is inevitably drawn towards further investigation, and one is forced to conclude that such an enormous lie fits perfectly with previous lies, and that lying is perhaps the primary attribute of this very fickle folk.

So why do we continue to tolerate it?

The stick of ‘anti-Semitism’, coupled with the carrot of financial benefits, is firmly in the hand of those who are steering our world towards an abyss.

It is not just the cucks who had better awaken, but our own people, too. It is foolhardy to think that just because "enough people" are against a certain event (our own destruction, for instance) that the efforts and the agenda-driven goons behind it will amazingly cease. It's not going to happen.

We, of necessity, must become harder and more prepared to do face to face confrontation, but in situations such as the enemy currently uses where it is not necessarily YOUR face whom they can see. We must develop tactics to become effective, but without alienation of our own base. That is difficult when the entire communications and media structures are in the hands of an enemy, but they are relentless, and so must we be, too. White people in all of our White countries must realize that, for them too, "The War Didn’t End At Appomattox". The agenda will continue on, with or without our participation, until there either is no longer reason for that agenda or until the ones pushing that agenda are absolutely crushed.

"The first phase of “reconstruction” was not quite able to destroy Southern culture and faith. That’s not to say they didn’t mightily try, but they couldn’t quite bring it all off–and Confederate flags and monuments all over the South attested to that. The flags and monuments were, in a sense, the Southerners’ way of saying “You tried to kill to kill us culturally (and theologically) but you didn’t quite make it.” But not to worry–the Yankee/Marxists plan to atone for their shortsightedness this time around. This time they will make sure they grind both us and our culture into the ground so they can stand with their jackboot on our necks while we cry out “Uncle Sam” or how about “He loved Big Brother.” It’s all the same.

If you don’t think this is what they have planned for us then you have totally misunderstood the Yankee/Marxist worldview. This is exactly their agenda for us, and good Southern folks had better wake up to that fact. The Yankee/Marxist only understands one thing–resistance! You can’t dialogue with him; you can’t negotiate with him, you can’t “be nice” to him. He takes all that as a sign of weakness and plows ahead even more ruthlessly. You have to resist him. You have to continue to resist him. The Bible says “Resist the devil and he will flee.” Same principle–same adversary. Unless we are prepared to do that and to teach our children to do that, we will lose. It’s as simple as that, and we had better wake up and realize it!"

You know these days that it has to be an older article to ask, "ARE YOU A TRUE AMERICAN?". Despite that, it can be helpful to look at our conditions today through the eyes of a true patriot [Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr] of our times past. We must have some of a similar order, characteristics and visions to reinvigorate for our futures.

"I believe that the United States could handle a higher quality of immigration without being a welfare state. After all, the Europeans came to North America to find freedom, not to take advantage of an Indian Welfare State. Unfortunately, most of the immigrants who have come to America in the past fifty years, have come, not to make America a better place to live, but to take advantage of her generosity.

I have heard the phrase used: "He is a resident of the United States, therefore he is an American." This statement is the product of the 20th Century American-Melting-Pot theory. It is the product of the murky and emphatically erroneous notion that being a "resident;" being a "citizen;" being a "member of a nation," are one and the same thing.

The loyal Southerner knew that the residents of the South who were called "carpetbaggers" and "scalawags" were not Southerners, even though they may have been born in the South. Countless aliens live in the United States, but this does not make them Americans. To be a true American, a person must think, act, live and believe in a way characteristic of true Americanism."

Of course, describing it as a "current" migrant crisis suggests unwittingly that the "crisis" is temporal. Once they are breeding in our territory, either with White women or their own, the process of transforming us genetically into the low IQ Afro-Islamic world is absolutely permanent barring a racial bloodletting.

Anti-White racists call White people who want to defend their territory racists, but when Black people do this they call them freedom fighters.

Identify anti-White racists and imprison or deport - or we lose Western Civilisation.

These are the same anti-Whites who deny White Genocide as a ridiculous conspiracy theory. Ask them: If you were to perpetrate White Genocide and not make it too obvious (doing it with ovens, death camps, gas chambers, blah, blah, blah), what would you be doing differently from what you're doing now?

And exactly what is the Islamic Religion, can not leave under the penalty of death, all law must conform to Sharia Law, the refugees do not want to become part of the German or European society but to set up their own communities with not national government supervision. Will radicalize in a heart beat and attack the same structures them are sheltering them from the bad guys. This is not a new war it dates from 623 AD when the Arab armies boiled out of Arabia, with the express intent of conquering the world for Islam, convert of die, if Christian or Jewish can live but must pay a tax. The Crusades were one of the westerns answers to the Islamic on quests. Folk this is about western culture and beliefs. Question, can you look at a person and tell me if they are radicalized or not, if you can please let the world know how you do that.

Half a billion in the US in twenty years. A billion by the end of the century. This will in no way help the native population. It will help the corporations making money along the margins. Also, in twenty years or less, expect the first crop of trillionaires to go public.

My comment made there has not yet appeared at the link to my 04:21 comment, so I must presume that it won't. It has good information and I will leave a copy of my comment below:

Mr. Benson has a very good article, which recognizes the devious but open plan to bury our Southern cultural existence and wipe it from memory. It is not only the "the Yankee/Marxists plan to atone for their shortsightedness this time around.", but the plans by those of similar category who have come to populate powerful positions within the South, and who are now proposing exactly that agenda. There is a real need for Southerners to become aware not only about the plans against rightful heritage, but about those who are most intent upon implementing them.

"Southern Jewish Life Magazinehttp://www.sjlmag.com/

Madeline Iles will speak about changing the Historic Natchez Tableaux (seen here in a 2007 file photo) last year, to no longer romanticize the pre-Civil War South, and to include black perspectives on slavery.

Each year individuals are recognized for their selfless contributions to the civil rights movement in Mississippi and beyond. Two years ago, the award and lecture series was expanded to honor more contemporary work around civil and social justice issues."—–http://www.sjlmag.com/2016/04/changing-mississippi-three-to-be.htmlThis comment is currently being held for moderation awaiting approval.

Of course, on this Anglophone blog, we are all aware of the bad press the Castilians have been getting for centuries. They threw the Muslims and their Jewish allies out of their country and, worst of the worst, they were Catholics. That's three strikes.

But really, if the Brits had conquered most of the Americas and beaten down the bloodthirsty savages with their degenerate, cannibal culture, we'd never hear the end of it. Oh, well, the Indians were scared of horses. No, it was previous to the advent of effective firearms. They did it with swords, hand to hand. Too bad it wasn't the Brits. We wouldn't be missing out on so much great white man history.

And maybe Castilian culture and attitude is more relevant and would be more helpful in our present situation. As opposed to callow Brit and bled-out Germanic culture.

Heat-imaging technology? Really? The much simpler option is to launch a couple of ads to dissuade the "manlets': Come here at your peril. No food or shelter either.

That's why I HATE HATE HATE all these soppy Irish people are lovely and welcoming videos. FFS, Irish people didn't keep their spot on one of the most beautiful and fertile landmasses by being "nice". I mean I don't see anyone trying for centuries to take over Greenland and change the people there. Why would you bother? Who in their right mind would CHOOSE to live there? No offense to Greenland natives - the people have my highest respect for surviving in harsh conditions.

Imagine a system where total tax is only 1%. That means TP [taxpayers] keep 99% [TC = tax consumers] Suppose TC want to raise taxes to 2%- TP keeps 98%

Now LOOK AT THE INCENTIVES EACH SIDE HAS, IN PERCENT TERMS.

TC goes from 1% to 2%- a doubling, a 100% increase. TP goes from 99% to 98%. TP loses 1/99 or 1.01%. [1% for now] NOW CALCULATE THE RATIO OF THESE EFFECTS- !00% divided by !%. This is the incentive ratio [100] Here, the TC HAVE 100 TIMES THE INCENTIVE TO FIGHT FOR HIGHER TAXES THAN THE TP HAS TO FIGHT AGAINST HIGHER TAXES.

SECOND EXAMPLE- total tax is 5%, TP keeps 95%. TC want taxes to double to 10%, leaving 90% for TP. TC again goes up 100%- TP loses 95/5 or 5.3%. Calculate the incentive ratio- 100% divided by 5.3% = 18.9. So the TC have almost 19 times the incentive to fight for higher taxes than the TP have to resist. . .

And the forces [incentives] will reach equilibrium at a total tax rate of 50%.

Anyone who has anything to say about America which has a good connotation refers to the America and Americans of the pre-1963 era.

Anyone having bad things to say about America and Americans are generally referring to the era following 1963.

Many Americans have the intelligence to realize that, though "unproven" [perhaps because the means of proof lie in the hands of perpetrators] the murder or assassination of JFK marked that delineation, when power transferred from American hands into the hands of [although it was not recognized at that time] a Crypto-jew. The same types of shift occurred in "American" businesses from operating for true American interests and the convenience of American shoppers to those kosher hands which now control most businesses and which cater to the globalist cabal (which strangely enough have the same globalized, even if not having the same "ethnic" makeups. Previous bonds which existed between American employers and their employees soon were broken. It was following 1963 when the media emboldened by their success in assisting with the pushing of the "Great Society" agenda pushed by LBJ, and their help in the integration and empowerment of malingering non-earners, running roughshod against the rights of the individual States and the people, and became exclusively and openly leftist in their orientation and messages. Drugs were glorified. Treason was ignored and supported via the anti-war protests, and America was sold out at the "Peace" table by Kissinger. The machination of powers of the CFR and misdirected efforts by the CIA became more visible. Not so visible were the shifts being made in the legal areas, and the institution of "administrative" powers to those not previously legally authorized to administer those "powers", especially in ways which were against fairness and decency, not to mention in opposition to long established Constitutional provisions."Immigration" was not really an issue for Americans - until a time [in it's present terms] long after that. Now, for True Americans, the primary issue is fast becoming that of survival. Some choose to try to blend in - into a very bleak world which will become no better - but made much worse, and infinitely more-so by their heathenistic bending and blending.

The Jews might have started it, but they can leave it on auto-pilot for a while now.

Diversity is just a wonderful campus fiefdom to be in. You’ll never be successful in having enough diversity, there will never come a day when your fiefdom will be shut down. Even if the campus population matches the population of the state down to a tenth of a percentage point (impossible, since every campus allows for foreign students), you can just move on to saying there’s not enough gender diversity. Even if you somehow match that up exactly (again, impossible, especially in fields where predominantly one gender tends to major), you can just move on to say there’s not enough homosexuals, transgenders, or whatever.

So, this fiefdom always, always, fails. The price for the failure? More money. The fiefdom just says “hey, we don’t have enough diversity on this campus, we should do something about it” and *bam*, another million a year is committed, because, hey, nobody wants to look to be against diversity.

"Whatever theories it offers gullible people. Communism in practice turns out to be the domination of the Whites by racial and social minorities under Jewish direction leading to the liquid-ation of Christianity and the "leadership class", the producers and defenders, of our race. Those who support the destructive measures against us contribute to our disintegration, whatever their motives may be." - Robert H . Williams

KNOW YOUR ENEMY ( 1958), pg 36"Frankfurter, The Boss The son of an Austrian revolutionary, brought to America at age 12, Felix Frankfurter proved to be the leading master mind behind the revolution in this innocent, naive republic." [Don't overlookthe section on The Anti-Defamation League which follows soon after that].http://www.resist.com/Instauration/OtherPubs-20120723/KnowYourEnemy-RobertWilliams.pdf

“…[W]e can only witness with alarm the rapid rise of their tribal kinsmen to high positions in the A r m y and A i r Force. Lieut. General M a r k Clark, the son of a gentile A r m y officer and the Jewess, Rebecca Ezekiels, de- spite a questionable military record in Italy, was promoted in September, 1949, to command all the A r m y Field Forces. General Clark, during his command of the American occupation zone in Austria, admitted hundreds of thousands of Marxist indoctrinated Jews to the American sector, an operation planned by the Zionist high command, which must have been concurred in by the Soviet U n i o n , else the Jews would not have been allowed to pass out from behind the iron curtain. They were not running from any danger; they were virtually proteges of the government.”[Same as above]

"The Communist Party makes its paramount undertaking the subjugation of the white race, under various disguises and pretexts. In a statement fo the Jew-ish people on page 8 of the June, 1950, issue of the official Communist monthly, "Jewish Life," a party-line spokesman stated:

"Our job as Jewish Communists is to take the lead in educating the Jewish masses on the meaning of white chauvinism and to enroll the Jewish community in an all-out fight against chauvinism. This is paramount in our work in the struggle for Negro rights. This is vital to the security of the Jewish people for their own security and future.". [Pp. 42-43 of Know Your Enemy]

Madeline Iles will speak about changing the Historic Natchez Tableaux (seen here in a 2007 file photo) last year, to no longer romanticize the pre-Civil War South, and to include black perspectives on slavery.

Each year individuals are recognized for their selfless contributions to the civil rights movement in Mississippi and beyond. Two years ago, the award and lecture series was expanded to honor more contemporary work around civil and social justice issues."—–http://www.sjlmag.com/2016/04/changing-mississippi-three-to-be.htmlThis comment is currently being held for moderation awaiting approval.

... and blah and blah and endless self-promoting jewish blah.

Go to the link and read all about how the Nussbaums managed to dodge KKK firebomb attacks ... and incidentally, proving that the Local Klu Klux Klan needed seeing-eye dogs as they could not somehow hit a jew with a bottle of petrol. Not much of a threat there, I guess.

Remarkably similar to the stories of the Oświęcim Oven-dodgers**, who (It vos a miracle!! A miracle, I tell you!!!) always had the shower door slam shut juuuust before they reached it ... leaving them alive to kvetch another day.

Once again, I reiterate that the total control of the media -- or as near total as dammit -- is their greatest weapon.

Take it away from them. How? By pandering to them.

Oblige them by behaving exactly the way they have accused us of doing over the centuries. Firebombs; Kristallnacht, flat of the sabre, and all that.

When they begin to shut up, that is not when you leave them alone. Deport every one of the hooknosed bastards back to israel ... and slam the gate shut on them.

Anyone who has anything to say about America which has a good connotation refers to the America and Americans of the pre-1963 era.

Many Americans have the intelligence to realize that, though "unproven" [perhaps because the means of proof lie in the hands of perpetrators] the murder or assassination of JFK marked that delineation, when power transferred from American hands into the hands of [although it was not recognized at that time] a Crypto-jew.

More to the point, Flanders, I think the Johnson years were basically when the mask came off. The jews were behind the scenes at the War between the States and finally blossomed -- if that is the term -- when America decided to become an imperial power.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p4_ries.html

The Fateful Year 1898: The United States Becomes an Imperial Power

The Great Debate Over American Overseas Expansion

By John Ries and Mark Weber

Most Americans have come to accept as entirely normal the readiness of their government to send troops to faraway lands. With few exceptions, even those who might oppose this or that specific action readily agree that such expeditions are sometimes appropriate to protect "national interests," stop wanton killing or otherwise "restore order."

It wasn't so long ago when most Americans firmly rejected global adventurism. Until the 1890s, America followed its traditional foreign policy of non-interventionism. The year 1898 was a landmark in the transition of the United States from a republic to an imperial power. Today, as Americans debate the merits of new military intervention in foreign lands, many of the arguments for and against such actions echo those made nearly a century ago, but with some interesting differences. Economic self-interest is no longer so readily acknowledged as a motive, and instead of Christianity or Western Civilization, politicians now like to talk of spreading the blessings of Democracy. What is still familiar, though, is the insistence that current American values and standards are, or should be, the model for the rest of the world.

Showing your age there old chap. I have a vague memory of Sweet Afton. Senior Service have been off the shelves for a few years. My Dad smoked Senior Service when they stopped selling Craven 'A', Black Cat.

Yet a black rap group can threaten to kill Trump and liberals are silent:

All the niggas in the hood wanna fight youSurprised El Chapo ain’t tried to snipe youSurprised the Nation of Islam ain’t tried to find youHave a rally out in L.A., we gon fuck it upHome of the Rodney King riot, we don’t give a fuckYou built walls? We gong prolly dig holesAnd if your ass do win, you gong prolly get smokedF**k nigga, f**k you!When me and Nip link, that’s Bloods and CripsWhere your L.A. rally? We gon crash your shit

"The Communist Party makes its paramount undertaking the subjugation of the white race, under various disguises and pretexts. In a statement fo the Jew-ish people on page 8 of the June, 1950, issue of the official Communist monthly, "Jewish Life," a party-line spokesman stated:

Dead right. Communism, although invented in Britain, Germany, and France is most assuredly anti-white. When Krushchev said "We will bury you", I can't help thinking that "you" probably meant whitey rather than just the USA.

James Burnham (ex-commie, then great analyst of commie comings and goings) stated that the Chinese and indeed most of the Asiatics saw communism as a temporary thing and the once it blew over they would have the world. Strange how that works isn't it?

Soon they will have the world. All we have to do is pay our rent somehow.