The Jared Kushner story is a perfect example of fake news

Is anyone surprised that a pack of greedy, self interested thieves are ratting each other out to the press? The White House are "wrangling like
pirates," as Shakespeare put it in Richard III. Trump supporters should probably read that and the "Scottish Play" to understand what is going on in
Washington these days.

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all
act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all
act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is
not the Mud Pit, is it?

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So how do they plan on "taking him down" if they know their stories are fake news? If it's fake then they have no chance of taking him down because
it's false information and will never hold up in a court of law.

What they're doing is playing with the emotions and biases of the American people and others abroad, nothing more or less. It's propaganda aimed at
both sides so that tensions will rise between the people.

The media doesn't really have a beef with Trump, at least not the ones who tell the anchors what to talk about, the owners of the media. All this is
is a psyop with Trump being a willing participant to divide the American people down party lines. It's working and people are absolutely eating it up.

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all
act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is
not the Mud Pit, is it?

When there is actually something to see, please let us know. Better still post it.

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all
act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is
not the Mud Pit, is it?

When there is actually something to see, please let us know. Better still post it.

There's plenty to see and read, you guys just intentionally ignore it or simply brush it aside as fake without consideration just because it's
unfavorable to your narrative.

Trump wasn't President unlike those other people you mentioned who were President at the time. Makes a big difference.

Actually it does not. He was already elected and the transition was underway. Setting up back channels of communication with new contacts was part
of that. Please provide some evidence that the President Elect is legally bound not to talk foreign govts in the way he deems appropriate.

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all
act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is
not the Mud Pit, is it?

When there is actually something to see, please let us know. Better still post it.

There's plenty to see and read, you guys just intentionally ignore it or simply brush it aside as fake without consideration just because it's
unfavorable to your narrative.

So post it. Post the actual evidence of a crime that we should be taking more seriously.
The onus always remains on those accusing someone of a crime to prove it. It is perfectly reasonable to reject accusations until actual evidence is
provided. Even for non crimes, you still have to post some evidence. Saying "someone said" constitutes nothing more than gossip.

You are complaining that Trump supporters refuse to give any credence to your gossip, nothing more.

Case in point... you have declared as true the gossip from a disgraced ex-NSA analyst that there was worldwide broadcast NSA town hall where Rodgers
stated that Trump colluded with Russia. Such an event broadcast to thousands must have more sources than this ex-NSA sexual deviant who was not even
there and left the NSA 13 years ago. Yet you didn't even bother to dig deeper into the story. Have you even checked whether there was even such a
town hall that took place?

So why didn't trump set up this type of communications with any other countries? Just the country that hacked the DNC and were being sanctioned by
the sitting president for messing in the election.
The messing of which allowed him to win. Funny enough.
And why only with a known adversary not with any allys?
Why was Russia the only one?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.