Based on the longitudinal and transverse analyses of the concept of right, including the contents of the private party’s rights, the obligations of the administrative organs, the types of illegal administrative acts, the contents of the claim and the relations among different types of administrative judgments. This chapter discloses the corresponding relationship between the type of the private party’s right, litigious claim and the administrative judgment.

Execution relation, which is subject to the law of execution, refers to relationshipof rights and obligations between enforcement authority, parties and interested othersthat happens in the execution procedure.

While the judgement is the confirmation of the rights and obligations enjoyed by person, legal person or other organization, the enforcement of judgement is the realization of those rights and obligations.

As a consequence, a critical mass of debt obligations for securitization has not accumulated in Russia yet.

The younger generation has grown up during a time of rapid progress and has experienced a confrontation between the new Western influences and traditional obligations and values.

In their totality however, they form a series of binding obligations and contracts, which tend to make emigration into a fact.

Since patient safety is the foremost goal, ethical obligations demand that every physicians be familiar with techniques that ensure adequate management of a difficult airway.

To do this, it will look at the use by these state elites of their relationships with the IMF and their banking policy obligations of the GATS as the rationale for acceleration and as the rationale for their overriding of local banking interests.

The testimony theory in the criminal suit has bearing on such concepts as evidence adducing,evidence testifing and evi dence investigating.Opinions of these ideas vary from person to person.Actually,the focus of evidence adducing in on giving or producing evidence;that of evidence testifying is on confirming or proving evidence;that of evidence investigating is on collecting,looking into or exarnining evidence,Judicial organs,litigants and the other parties concerned have different functions,responsibilities,rights...

The testimony theory in the criminal suit has bearing on such concepts as evidence adducing,evidence testifing and evi dence investigating.Opinions of these ideas vary from person to person.Actually,the focus of evidence adducing in on giving or producing evidence;that of evidence testifying is on confirming or proving evidence;that of evidence investigating is on collecting,looking into or exarnining evidence,Judicial organs,litigants and the other parties concerned have different functions,responsibilities,rights and obligations in different suit procedures.Briefly,it con be boiled down to such formulas as "He proposes who adduces evidence","He concludes who testifies evidenced "He concludes who testifies evidence"and "He examins who investigates evidence".The achieverment of a definite understanding of these concepts and their discriminations in of necessity to make a deeper study of the testimony theory in the criminal suit and also of value in the perfection of the structure of criminal suit in our country.

Just Trial" firstly appears in the revised "Criminal Procedure COde" and aims at equalizing the footing of the prosecutor and the defender by absorbing a lot from common law system in the trial stage. In the stage of investigation, the premier and key stageof the whole contentious procedure, it is the inquisitorial mould that our nation persues all along, though. In such a mould, the part of defence and the national investigation anthority are on the unequal standing, since thousands of years' law cultural background...

Just Trial" firstly appears in the revised "Criminal Procedure COde" and aims at equalizing the footing of the prosecutor and the defender by absorbing a lot from common law system in the trial stage. In the stage of investigation, the premier and key stageof the whole contentious procedure, it is the inquisitorial mould that our nation persues all along, though. In such a mould, the part of defence and the national investigation anthority are on the unequal standing, since thousands of years' law cultural background ofthe obligation departmentalism has directly or indirectly made the positions of the denfence be of the real objects. Relatively, the position of the suspect and defender and that of the national investigation authority aren't equal at all. Therefore, the "Just Investigation"can't be achieved, which leads the contentious structure to the lacking of premises in balance. So the expected "Just Trial" turns out only to be the castles in the air. There the writers try to introduce the adversary Investigation Mould which lasy stress on "Impeachment system" into the stage of investigation in our nation. The adversary Investigation Mould will suit the would－be court trial well and help to improve the joint work between the investigation and court trial in order to perfect the criminal procedure in our nation.

WT5BZ]:In the light of the progressive experience of witness system acquired by foreign countries the paper discusses the practice of civil trial in respect of witness's rights, the procedure of his presentation in court and the witness's obligations and rights. Hence it puts forward a solution to the problem of the witness's refusal to offer testimony in civil court. [WT5HZ]