Follow me on Twitter

Australia “dumb” deal update: Aussie Libs want US to take families

Posted by Ann Corcoran on April 11, 2018

Let me say at the outset that the Australia deal struck by the Obama Administration in its waning months is dumber than dumb and Donald Trump should have followed his first instincts and cancelled the whole thing (as even the Australians suspected he would) and been done with it in February of 2017.

Here we see that Australian immigration official Peter Dutton is being blamed for not allowing an Afghan family (who attempted to break in to Australia illegally) that have been split between the mainland and offshore detention to apply to come to the US.

Dutton’s call to rethink the 1951 UN Refugee Convention has to make the No Borders agitators crazy! Out to get him now for sure!*

I believe the US State Department has already said that we aren’t taking extended families of the detainees (so far 220 of Australia’s rejects, mostly Muslim men, have been airlifted to Your Town, USA!).

For new readers, Australia had such an awful problem with boat people attempting to break in to their country that they made a new policy. Anyone breaking in would be detained in offshore detention facilities and would never be admitted to the mainland. That was about 5 years ago and they are sticking to the policy. However! Lefties in Australia have been beating up the government ever since, so they found a way to wiggle out—thanks to Obama—by sending those they won’t grant refugee status to to America!

Dutton urged to allow refugee families in Australia to apply for US resettlement

Split up refugee families stuck in limbo because of Australian government policy could be reunited if Peter Dutton let them apply for US resettlement from Australia, the opposition has said.

The comment follows revelations by Guardian Australia that a family of four had been split between Nauru and Australia since 2014.

Leftwing “shadow minister” Shayne Neumann blames Dutton for not allowing sick Shiite Muslim family to reunite and apply for US resettlement. Hey! Neumann, why should the US take on Australia’s migration problems!

Australian Border Force has told the 27-year-old daughter on Nauru that they could be reunited but only if her mother and sister returned to the island. The mother is in Australia confined to a wheelchair and awaiting surgery, and doctors have said she cannot go back.

While the mother and one daughter are in Australia they cannot apply for resettlement in the US, offered under a deal struck between the Australian government and the Obama administration. More than 220 have been resettled, out of a promise of “up to 1,200”.

By the way, something must have slowed the flow to the US. Last reportwas over a month ago. Wonder what that is all about!

“Labor strongly supports the US refugee resettlement agreement and wants all eligible refugees – including those in Australia for medical treatment – to have the opportunity to apply for resettlement in the US,” the shadow minister for immigration, Shayne Neumann, said.

“The long-term issue of asylum seekers from Manus Island and Nauru in Australia could have been avoided entirely if Peter Dutton simply allowed eligible refugees in Australia the opportunity to apply to resettle in the United States.”

Follow links back and see that this family with its health issues (including mental health issues) would be a huge burden on US taxpayers! Legitimate refugees are to ask for asylum in the first safe country they enter, however, the whole system has been perverted and that is why the 1951 UN Refugee Convention should be trashed.

I have dozens of posts on the Australia “dumb” deal, click hereto learn more.

FatherJonsaid

This is a standard leftist tactic, aligning themselves with so-called human rights lawyers, to enable illegals either to enter Australia or facilitate their removal elsewhere. As pointed out the US authorities aren’t even mentioned in the Guardian article. I don’t think this will go anywhere, the Guardian gives great prominence to these stories, far in excess of their likelihood at success. Send them all back to Afghanistan!

spartansporesaid

The war in Afghanistan that facilitated their so-called refugee status is for the most part over, it’s time they were all sent back they should have never been sent all over the Western world to begin with, a secure place could have been established in the Middle East for them to be Kept in.

The Saudi’s had excellent tent cities set up that could have housed millions I’ve seen the pictures why weren’t they sent their? The answer is it was all planned the globalists and their puppets Bush and Obama created the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq that would make it possible to export jihad to Western countries this is been their modus operandi for centuries, migration is part of jihad as Ann has pointed out on numerous occasions.

George Taylorsaid

Ann, I was in Sydney four days last week. No shortage of Muslim Tourists there. Bank on nearly every corner just about. Something does not ring true. They show way more enrichment than commerce to support it even though Sydney is the largest natural harbor in the world. Their major investment is obviously tourism and the muslim world is a lot closer to them than to U.S. Some things to think about.