It's Officially Over: WTO Kills Doha Round (2001-Never)

During the last WTO meeting, its members decided to discontinue reaffirming the Doha Development Agenda's mandate, effectively killing it off. What's especially notable is that the country which was most adamant in launching it and styling it as a "development agenda" instead of a "round"--the United States--has been wishing to kill it off for quite some time now:

The World Trade Organisation is facing the biggest shake-up of its agenda in a generation after its members in effect abandoned the long-stalled Doha round. For the first time since the round was launched amid great fanfare in
2001, the WTO’s 164 members, ending a conference in Nairobi at the
weekend, declined to “reaffirm” Doha’s mandate.

They
also opened the door to discussing new issues and focusing more on
delivering smaller packages of trade reforms. Agreements included a
global ban on farming export subsidies that Roberto Azevêdo, the WTO’s
director-general, called the “most significant” achievement on
agriculture in the organisation’s history. The new line in Nairobi, said one senior trade official, amounted to “the death of Doha and the birth of a new WTO”.

It also marked a victory for the US and EU, who alongside other
developed economies have argued that clinging to the long-stalled Doha
negotiations was making the institution irrelevant in a changing global
econom.
Instead of aiming to complete these vast, cross-cutting rounds like
before, the WTO is moving towards more tractable issue-focused
negotiations, which probably makes more sense in this day and age when
there are so many different parties with differing interests. Moreover, delegates the world over tired of meeting on something which became moribund quite some time ago:

Doha
was launched in 2001, two months after the September 11 attacks, with
much rhetoric about gestures of global unity but too little support from
businesses to keep it going. It was also oversold as a “development
round”, with the aim of helping poorer countries trade their way out of
poverty, with a particular focus on agriculture.

Three problems rapidly became evident. One, behind the mask of
solidarity between developing countries lay deep divisions, for example
between agricultural net importers and exporters, preventing
constructive proposals for liberalisation. Two, countries such as China
transformed beyond recognition during the round, becoming global export
powerhouses yet continuing to plead developing country status. Three,
the US in particular proved to be largely spineless in taking on its own
farm lobby, which demanded improbable amounts of market access abroad
in return for subsidy cuts at home.

The mistake globophobes make it to assume that because the Doha Round is dead, so is the WTO. Actually, it's just attempts to push through vast, broadly inclusive trade rounds that's over, not the WTO which is actually moving forward on sectoral interests such as the Information Technology Agreement (ITA). Whatever you think of it, the WTO goes on after Doha.