"To outside cultures and later generations, [insert persons here] are often seen as the archetype of the Proud Warrior Race, although this is a gross oversimplification. No Real Life culture could ever be counted, because real people are not so simplistic."

I would basically agree with that. It's a hat, and those don't really apply to real people.

With a note that says they're often seen like that by outside cultures, I don't see anything wrong with including it. For specifically Arabs, I'm less sure, but the other three cultures you mentioned it does fit, since they are often portrayed like that. In the Proud Warrior Race description, it says it's most often about villains, and the ones who consider them to be villains are other cultures.

Offhand I would say yes because there are well documented cultures where warfare was a major part of their society, but the hallmark of a proud warrior race is usually a sense of honor, glory and bloodlust. Because of that it is too easy to misrepresent any culture given that label, so in practice on the wiki I would say probably not.

I'd say the Spartans are probably about as close as reality gets to a Proud Warrior Race. I don't know if this has been disproven by more recent archeology, but my understanding is that the Spartans had very little art and the like.

With groups like the Norse and Arabs, while they did their fair share of fighting (what culture hasn't?) they also did other stuff. The fact that someone would think of Arabs as both a Proud Warrior Race and a Proud Merchant Race suggests that either/both of those is a simplistic characterization.

Heh, I think there's actually a closer archeological basis to call the Vikings a Proud Merchant Race - just one with a very active Merchant Marines.

Agreed with others - given how much of a gross oversimplification the trope in question is, I don't think it can really apply to a Real Life culture. Based on how spotty the historical record is about said time, even the Spartans can't really be difinitively called one. You probably could get just as much milage calling the modern U.S. one, and that's a can of worms we don't want opened.

Agreeing with what a lot of others are saying, I think this should have no real life examples. It would be a stereotypical simplification/distortion of any real culture you applied it to, and would lead to debate and natter on the main page.

@Jordan and KJ Mackley: while the Spartans have indeed a long history of being portrayed (and cultivating a self-image) as a Proud Warrior Race, real life simply is much more complex than a Planet of Hats. For example, the martial code of Spartan society allowed for, even included behavior that would not seem noble or honorable to us, and doesn't really harmonize with the Proud Warrior Race Guy stereotype.

Well, the very first example under Proud Merchant Race is about the Vikings. It was an important aspect of their culture, even moreso than Proud Warrior Race, which reflected their religion more. Still, like just about all cultures in those ages, the vast majority of the population consisted of simple farmers, with craftsmen and other producers coming at a distant second place.

In other words, real life examples should take consideration for how it actually was. I would say that any examples in recent centuries shouldn't be brought up, though.

Edit: I also agree with Jordan that a people can not be a Proud Merchant Race and a Proud Warrior Race within the same work. A Planet of Hats can only have one hat at a time. So if you can't decide which hat a culture/people/race has within a given work, it probably doesn't have a hat.

I have no objection to adding the No Real Life Examples, Please! tag, and your last sentence ("A Planet of Hats can only have one hat at a time. So if you can't decide which hat a culture/people/race has within a given work, it probably doesn't have a hat.") is a neat, clear summary of why it's there.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.

"the Proud Warrior Race Guy seeks battle and bloodshed because his culture teaches that doing so is the greatest source of personal honor and glory."

That is not exclusive of any other features of a society, such as being merchants, religious, or whatever. Your society doesn't have to do nothing but fight to be a Proud Warrior Race. It just has to teach that fighting is the greatest source of personal honour and glory.

Yes. There are plenty of accusations of America being a war-mongering society (we declare "war" on anything that generates buzz: War On Drugs, War On Terrorism, War On Obesity, etc.) Not to mention that we consider soldiers KIA to be martyrs worthy of the highest praise, we glorify heroes who fight enemies to our way of life, we take pride in the strength of our Armed and Naval forces, we have three major sporting events dedicated to unarmed combat (wrestling, boxing and MMA) and treat their champions as heroes, we have entire debates over the right to own and use weapons, much of our culture is built around hunting, and most of our fiction aimed at young boys always involves fighting.

I wouldn't object to mention the "Martial Races" concept of the British Empire, because that is a historical attempt at classification from an outsider perspective, and not our own classification. However, if there is a folder titled "Real Life", this folder will grow until every people past or present that can be shoehorned into this category will be listed here. "Proud Warrior Race" is one of those magical tropes that tend to be regarded as trophies by editors. Everybody wants his own people or his favorite historical empire or culture to be a "Proud Warrior Race".

And even if the various "Proud Race" tropes are not Planet of Hats, I'd still contend that a race/culture can not be both, a Proud Warrior Race and a Proud Merchant Race (or a Proud Scholar Race). Proud Warriors put martial values above everything else; Proud Merchants put commerce and profit above everything else; Proud Scholars put knowledge above everything else. Surely a people can have warriors, merchants and scholars all simultaneously, but to be a Proud X Race, one trait must dominate over all others.

Also, given how complex entire cultures are, it's a gross oversimplification of various aspects of culture to boil it down to "they glorify warriors to the exclusion of all else."

Heck, take sengoku-era and Tokugawa shogunate-era Japan. Big-time warrior race happenings, right? Well, I'd like to note that the subversions of that idea as presented in Kurosawa's Seven Samurai have been around as long as the samurai themselves. And I bet that, if the historical record was more complete, more ancient cultures would prove similarly disqualified.

It just doesn't make sense to have it apply in Real Life - any real culture is bound to fall short.

Community

Tropes HQ

TVTropes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org. Privacy Policy