We need a Change...

Considering "Hope and Change have failed, we need to find our next President from those running against Mr Obama. Even liberal commentators, such as Maureen Dowd are turning against the President as they recognize his lack of ability...

Member Comments

Kozy62

How do you know the jobs report is a bad one? Well, when CNBC titles their article “US Jobs Creation Plunges, but Rate Drops to 7.6%” while the ticker above it reads “Stocks Tumble 1% after Dismal Jobs Report, Dow Skids 150,” you know it can’t be great. Sure, the unemployment rate fell .1% all the way down to 7.6%, but the US economy only created 88,000 jobs. The dropping unemployment rate is simply an effect of the shrinking size of the labor force.

This is criminal...this President has gone on three vacations and a long fund raising trip while Americans suffer. He should be impeached!

Kozy62

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s decision to launch his own political organization has some Democrats wondering: Is he just in it for himself?

Obama’s new group, Organizing for Action, will focus on his policy agenda – not on electing Democratic candidates – by raising unlimited amounts of cash and accessing the president’s secret list of 20 million supporters, volunteers and donors.

Are democrats going to finally see him for what he is? We need a change asap...

Kozy62

The Biblical celebration of Passover was Monday and President Obama gave a message at the White House in honor of the celebration. Of course, being the narcissist he is, he had to mention himself 7 times by using an I statement in a scant 269 word message. That is one mention of himself every 38 words. That ladies and gentlemen, is our Narcissist-In-Chief...

Isn't there something elsewhere that would make him feel more important and he just quit being our President...we need a change!

Kozy62

Tom Coburn

The Senate just passed my budget amendment #412 by a voice vote to end special discounts for political parties at the Post Office. Political entities should not be receiving discounts that deprive the cash-strapped Postal Service of sorely needed revenue.

Kozy62

Senate Democrats on Wednesday, March 13th, officially unveiled a budget resolution for the first time in nearly four years. It presents a stark contrast to the latest offering by House Republicans, which achieves balance within a decade without raising taxes. The Democratic proposal never balances, and calls for a $1 trillion tax increase, at least $100 billion in stimulus spending, and a smattering of nebulous spending cuts, most of which can be chalked up to accounting gimmicks.

Now that Senate Democrats have finally put their plan on paper, it is not hard to understand why they have been so reluctant to do so. For one, it is far easier to demagogue an opponent’s proposal without a serious plan of your own to defend. In almost all respects, the Democratic budget is a political testament to President Obama’s insistence that “we don’t have an immediate crisis in terms of debt.”

Kozy62

Stroke of genius? More of a display of genius. Couldn't wait to witness this man of conscience and statesmanship.

I've been having an absolute blast with the liberals over at an overwhelmingly liberal blog, and I can't believe how quickly they accept Eric Holder's rationale toward the use of drones against American citizens in America.

I'm thinking to myself, are these the same people that were horrified over FISA court warrants for wiretapping transnational calls?

If the President can use a drone against American citizens, could he not instead send an assassin? What's the difference?

Kozy62

This is completely out of control and needs to be changed...There’s nothing moderate or incremental about the increase in federal regulations — and hence in centralized executive power — under President Obama. To the contrary, according to figures published by the Obama White House, the costs of regulations issued by this administration have dwarfed the costs of regulations issued by prior administrations.

In fact, as the chart below shows, the costs of “major” regulations — those estimated to cost at least $100 million in any one year (in 2001 dollars) — issued by the Obama administration in its first three years nearly tripled the cost of those issued by the Clinton administration in its first three years, nearly quintupled the cost of those issued by the George W. Bush administration in its first three years, and nearly doubled the cost of those issued by Bush and Clinton combined. Again, that’s according to the Obama White House’s own tallies.