Perspective: Postal Service delivery plan is needed to address deficit

Posted: February 10, 2013 - 1:18am

The following editorial appeared in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram on Thursday:

The U.S. Postal Service, an independent agency that receives no taxpayer money for operation, is a 200-year-old institution still tethered to Congress by centuries-old shackles.

Partly because of that impediment, and changing communication habits in a technologically advanced society, the Postal Service has been losing billions of dollars the past few years - $15.9 billion in the last fiscal year alone. This has happened even though it reduced staff, combined operations and cut hours in some underused post offices.

After months of imploring Congress - with little success - to approve cost-cutting measures, including closing thousands of postal stations, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe announced Wednesday that the USPS will stop Saturday letter delivery.

Package deliveries, an area where the Postal Service has increased business, would continue six days a week, as would service to post office boxes.

The move is expected to save $2 billion annually. But it also conflicts with a 30-year mandate from Congress: Appropriations bills routinely call for six-day delivery.

Donahoe says he has authority to move forward on the change, which would take effect in August, because Congress hasn’t approved an appropriations bill and the government is operating under a continuing resolution (a temporary spending rule). That temporary measure expires March 27, so lawmakers still would have time to stop the plan if they want to.

Some members of Congress have expressed support for the proposal, but others argue that cutting Saturday service would hurt rural areas and some businesses.

For the Postal Service to return to stability, much less profitability, it must continue to modernize and improve its ability to compete.

The USPS has 546,000 career employees and operates the world’s largest fleet of civilian vehicles, according to the agency website, about.usps.com.

While many in Congress understand this, they’ve found it difficult to consider changes to an institution that their constituents often see as not just a vital service but also a local landmark or an important community center.

But if the agency is to remain any of those things, Congress must let it be a viable business.

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for
following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and
comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are
automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some
comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules,
click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

put the Postal Service on the never-ending list of things people like that must be destroyed so it can be privatized and our wealthy friends will make lots of money and John and Jane Q. Public will be screwed once again. In 2006 ReTHUGlicans in the Congress pushed through a requirement that the Postal Service pre-fund 75 years of retiree costs. The Postal Service has to pay now for employees who are not even born yet. No other government agency – and certainly no company – has to do this.

It is a lie.. bold-faced bull. The THUGs want OUR public Postal Service to fail so they have forced insane rules upon them in hopes that they can force the Postal Service to fail. Then we will pay a lot more for really crappy service to keep a few boys wealthy. Don't believe this gibberish.