News

​Tortoise North American: A New Way to Play MLPs

Income investors have always had an affinity for master limited partnerships, or MLPs. These unique vehicles offer exposure to the energy sector through a high yield, equity-like security, notesDavid Fabian, editor of theFlexible Growth & Income Report.

Their business models and tax structures are such that they can pass through a great deal of their profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. This makes them coveted for both their unconventional returns vs. stocks or bonds in addition to their healthy income streams.

Those who have dabbled in owning MLPs through an exchange-traded product are probably most familiar with the venerable Alerian MLP ETF (AMPL) or J.P. Morgan Alerian MLP Index ETN; these two funds control nearly $15 billion in total assets.

I consider these indexes the first generation of MLP fund exposure and they surely get the job done. However, the expenses on these funds are still quite high compared to traditional stock-like indexes.

There is also room for improving the index construction criteria to broaden exposure to this group or hone in on varying characteristics of the MLPs themselves.

Fortunately, the second generation of MLP funds is now taking note of these shortcomings and improving on them dramatically. At the tip of this spear is a relatively new fund that is rapidly becoming one of my favorites in the class.

The Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is nearing its second anniversary and has accumulated $72 million in total assets. This unique ETF tracks the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, which represents a benchmark of energy pipeline, distribution, storage, and processing companies.

The fund is more diversified than a pure MLP index. In fact, it has 55% of the portfolio in traditional MLPs and the remaining in energy-related corporations and LLCs. This broadens the exposure to include nearly 90 stocks rather than the conventional 25-40 holdings that most dedicated MLP indexes are beholden to.

I tend to like greater diversification because it reduces single-sector volatility, while still allowing investors to participate in the overall trend and price action.

Other than the obvious benefits of diversification, another advantage of investing in this sector through an ETF is that investors aren’t subject to a K-1 tax form. Owners of TPYP are subject to standard 1099 dividend income just like a traditional stock fund.

TPYP also offers the lowest expense ratio of its peers at just 0.40%. That’s less than half the 0.85% management fee of a fund like AMLP.

It’s worth noting that the broader industry coverage of TPYP also works against it in terms of the portfolio yield. As of its March 31, 2017, ETF fact sheet, the listed distribution yield is at 4.40%.

That’s meaningfully lower than many other aggressive yield-seeking MLP funds that target smaller companies or distressed assets in search of high income. Nevertheless, those types of funds are going to come with a much higher risk of invested capital as well.

Both MLP veterans and industry newbies can find things to like about the structure of the TPYP portfolio. It brings many positive attributes to the table and is one of my new favorite ETFs for diversified access to this sector.

The key, of course, is finding the right time to add this type of fund to your ETF income portfolio. While I haven’t made an allocation yet, this will become a staple on my watch list for a small tactical position when the right risk/reward setup is presented to us.

David Fabian is Managing Partner and Chief Operations Officer of FMD Capital Management which he started in 2013.

About MoneyShow.com: Founded in 1981, MoneyShow is a privately held financial media company headquartered in Sarasota, Florida. As a global network of investing and trading education, MoneyShow presents an extensive agenda of live and online events that attract over 75,000 investors, traders and financial advisors around the world.

DISCLOSURE:
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of equities.com. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to: http://www.equities.com/disclaimer