I will take this as a tacit admission that you know your guy is guilty, that Trump has all the honor and dignity of rat gonorrhea, and the only thing you care about is your agenda. A proud moment for conservatives.

To date Mueller has indicted or convicted 37 people (the graphic above was made in May 2018), and this isn't a long investigation by historical standards. Not that he has to justify has to justify the length of his investigation to anyone other than the AG.

The graphic harks back to the call that “today is the day where Trump was brought down”.

How about you limit yourself to actual arrests of his gang, or maybe even convictions?

The reasons for this have been explained, many times. So honestly, you think he's innocent? Just a big witch hunt?

I acknowledged the whole “Trump can’t be charged” thing by referencing his gang. When Trump Foundation execs are hauled off then things are real. But as I mentioned elsewhere, Trump’s support is not predicated on quaint traditional notions of Governmental virtue.

To date Mueller has indicted or convicted 37 people (the graphic above was made in May 2018), and this isn't a long investigation by historical standards. Not that he has to justify has to justify the length of his investigation to anyone other than the AG.

1x making false statements to the FBI: 14-day sentence.
1x another “false statement”
1x another “false statement”
1x another false statement - 30 days
1x pre Trump work for Ukrainian politicians and personal finances
1x “similar charges” to above
13x Russians with no observed connection to Trump
1x indentity theft in relation to above. 6 months.
1x Russian involved with Mafafort’s pre Trump Ukrainian thingie
12 x Russians for email hacking. No direct connection to Trump.
Cohen for personal finances and alleged campaign fund violations. First possible strike.
Stone, not on the Trump team, for alleged conversations with Wikileaks.
Patten for not registering as a lobbyist for Ukrainians.

Not exactly the burning of the Reichstag. But exactly what I’d expect to see from a trawling operation and the unsurprising gamification of the election by Putin. I’d be disappointed if the United States didn’t play similar games. Weaponised Facebook adverts. Far worse than hanging chads.

Sunder wrote: ↑
Reminder apropos of nothing that zero people were convicted of any crimes in six years of Clinton investigations.

I imagine you're talking about the Benghazi and e-mail investigations, because when it comes to the 1990's Clinton administration, there were plenty of convictions. 15 people were convicted of over 40 crimes from the Whitewater investigation alone (which, of course, metastasized), including Jim Guy Tucker, the sitting governor of Arkansas at the time, and Webster Hubbell, Clinton's Associate Attorney General.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑
So FT (usually) finds CFB tiresome. He had Kirb on ignore. Placid Keating has snifffed at FTP (over in ethno-thread). Now dear Fuzzy has turned feral.

Surely the mob can’t be turning of the Pit’s “rat pack”? :lol: :lol:

Not surprisingly, you think that will help. It won't. Because, regardless of any moral support you may receive, Trump is almost certainly guilty of many felonies. We already have collusion. He has been, and continues to be an awful president and a stain on American history. By almost any accounting, he is a traitor.

No amount of support for Trump here is going to change that.

Also, your inability to answer a question is kinda funny. Do you think Trump is guilty or not?

Brive1987 wrote: ↑
So FT (usually) finds CFB tiresome. He had Kirb on ignore. Placid Keating has snifffed at FTP (over in ethno-thread). Now dear Fuzzy has turned feral.

Surely the mob can’t be turning of the Pit’s “rat pack”? :lol: :lol:

Not surprisingly, you think that will help. It won't. Because, regardless of any moral support you may receive, Trump is almost certainly guilty of many felonies. We already have collusion. He has been, and continues to be an awful president and a stain on American history. By almost any accounting, he is a traitor.

No amount of support for Trump here is going to change that.

Also, your inability to answer a question is kinda funny. Do you think Trump is guilty or not?

Nah. Just an observation. Though my position isn’t getting “moral support”. The friendly indifference appears aimed at how people operate not what they say.

I have answered your question. I’d be surprised and slightly disappointed if Trump hadn’t been Trump and therefore ignored the playing rules. I doubt he orchestrated any of the Godzilla conspiracies being mooted on a daily basis by Dems or that being investigated by the big M.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑
And there I thought consensus here abouts was that (D) support for “reparations” was a (R) libel.

I though it was complete BS but apparently not. Warren and others are talking about "starting a conversation" about reparations". If they are even remotely considering the cut them all a big check approach to reparations I think that is ridiculous and probably unworkable. If they can find a workable approach to help people out of poverty/crime/ type cycles and do it regardless of race and according to need then that could be OK.
Obama went on record as opposing reparations. I'm shocked it is being seriously considered.It almost sounds like the Dems want to lose the next election.

Brive1987 wrote: ↑
And there I thought consensus here abouts was that (D) support for “reparations” was a (R) libel.

https...://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1107813046695673857?s=21

I though it was complete BS but apparently not. Warren and others are talking about "starting a conversation" about reparations". If they are even remotely considering the cut them all a big check approach to reparations I think that is ridiculous and probably unworkable. If they can find a workable approach to help people out of poverty/crime/ type cycles and do it regardless of race and according to need then that could be OK.
Obama went on record as opposing reparations. I'm shocked it is being seriously considered.It almost sounds like the Dems want to lose the next election.

Helping people to be productive members of society is a fine objective, be it raising them up or trickling opportunity down.

Couching it in the context of slave reparations is Christchurch level accelerationist-bastardry.

Could you give your grand unified theory as to how these things relate to each other?

Loath as I am to encourage someone to spill ink, or at least waste pixels to build futile (or is it pointless?) walls of text - perhaps the time has come to screw your courage to the sticking place and release the Brive manifesto.

Could you give your grand unified theory as to how these things relate to each other?

Loath as I am to encourage someone to spill ink, or at least waste pixels to build futile (or is it pointless?) walls of text - perhaps the time has come to screw your courage to the sticking place and release the Brive manifesto.

The dimming of the West, my friend. The grand collapse of all that's good and holy. The absolute collapse of morality into decadence, barbarians in the henhouse. The same predictions as have been going on forever (you should have heard my granddad go on about Italians; remarkably similar) but this time, it will really happen, for sure.

But I like the idea of the Brive manifesto, much better than trying to red-pill the pit by innuendo and indirect means.

Could you give your grand unified theory as to how these things relate to each other?

Loath as I am to encourage someone to spill ink, or at least waste pixels to build futile (or is it pointless?) walls of text - perhaps the time has come to screw your courage to the sticking place and release the Brive manifesto.

The dimming of the West, my friend. The grand collapse of all that's good and holy. The absolute collapse of morality into decadence, barbarians in the henhouse. The same predictions as have been going on forever (you should have heard my granddad go on about Italians; remarkably similar) but this time, it will really happen, for sure.

Clearly your grandfather just didn't understand that the Italians are western, and from Europe. That obviously means they have the same culture as everyone else from the west and caused absolutely no disruption or concern when they came over.

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote: ↑
But I like the idea of the Brive manifesto, much better than trying to red-pill the pit by innuendo and indirect means.

I have to second this. I'm running dangerously low on toilet paper, and it might be a few days before I can make it to a store.