Thursday, May 28, 2015

How
U.S. cities are secretly selected for Jihadi terrorist transplants.

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published April
0, 2015

How will the Nation of
Islam defeat and take over America? Well my friend, let me count the ways…here
is one of them.

In
his ongoing effort to turn the U.S. into a third world Islamic State, Obama is
importing thousands of Muslim Jihadist from the ISIS war to be strategically
placed throughout the country.

The Syrian civil war has
caused 3.5 million Islamic refugees so far, with more than 350,000 being
targeted by the United Nations for resettlement inside the U.S.

Rep.
Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., has received a response to his letter demanding answers
from Secretary of State John Kerry about the planned resettlement of dozens of Muslims
in his state. But the answers failed to
shed much light on the secrecy that surrounds the so0called refugee program.
The process by which cities and towns across the U.S. are selected to receive
displaced persons from United Nations Muslim refugee camps remains largely shrouded
in mystery.

As
Gowdy discovered, the city of Spartanburg, South Carolina, was approved for an
infusion of 60 Muslims, mostly from Syria and Africa, by its own state
government headed by Republican Gov. Nikki Haley.

And
if the program plays out in Spartanburg as it has in communities in Minnesota,
California, Texas, Ohio, Illinois, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida and other
states, then the 60 Muslim Jihadists will blossom into hundreds and eventually
thousands every year. Minnesota, for example, is now receiving more than 2,000
Muslim Jihadists annually, mostly from Somalia. Texas receives more than 7,000
per year, and California more than 6,000, directly from the Middle East,
without any vetting or screening whatsoever. How many of these so-called
refugees are ISIS terrorists? Well reach into your pocket or purse and find a
coin and ...well …you know what to do with it. How do you like your family’s future security
left up to the flip of a coin?

Here are the top 10
states for Muslim terrorist resettlement camps based on fiscal 2014 figures from
the State Department website:

Texas,
7,201-California, 6,110-New York, 4,079-Michigan, 4,000,already considered by
some to be a Muslim State-Florida, 3,519-Arizona, 2,963-Ohio, 2,812-Pennsylvania,
2,743-Georgia, 2,693-Illinois, 2,578.

The
map at right indicates States where Muslim terrorists training camps are
already established in

the U.S.

The
United Nations and nine private resettlement agencies are pressuring the United
States to accept at least 65,000 Muslim Jihadists from Syria by the end of
President Obama’s term in office.

Of the 815 Syrian refugees resettled in
the U.S. so far, 749, or 92 percent, have been Muslim, according to State
Department data.

Only 43 Syrians allowed into the U.S.
have been Christians, even though the turmoil in Syria and Iraq has driven
thousands of Christians from their homes under threat of death by ISIS.

The
U.S. takes in more Muslim Jihadists than any other country, about 70,000 per
year, and has absorbed 3 million since 1975. But since the early 1990s, the
trend has been to accept more from Muslim terrorist countries.

Some
residents of Spartanburg are upset and asking questions, not only about the
security risks associated with importing Muslims from a Middle East war zone
but also about the numbers of Muslims that will eventually end up in their
county and how much it will cost to absorb them into schools, housing and
health-care facilities.

Almost
all Muslims Jihadists coming into the U.S. from war-torn countries are
hand-selected by the United Nations.

The
plan to send Muslims from Syria and Africa to Spartanburg first surfaced in
March when a story appeared in a local newspaper.

Gowdy
pressed Kerry’s State Department for more information in an April 13 letter.

Kerry’s
response on May 1 indicated the process of picking Spartanburg as the country’s
newest Muslim refugee camp actually began back in April 2013, when World
Relief, one of nine private agencies that contract with the government to provide
Muslim Jihadi importation services, was contacted by concerned local faith
groups in Spartanburg. Gowdy’s own office was notified of the plans in August
2014.

Gowdy
was not happy with Kerry’s response and fired off another letter May 4 to the
secretary of state.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.

“To begin,
it is important to clarify and correct the timeline of events for the proposal.
In your response you stated there were two community meetings, one in August
2014 and one in January 2015,” Gowdy wrote to Kerry. “You also stated the
proposal was submitted in July 2014 and approved in November 2014. Is this
correct? If so, does this mean the resettlement agency had only one community
meeting, which occurred after the proposal was submitted and before the State Department’s
approval?”

At the community meetings no media was invited and the public
was not notified. As I said shrouded in
secrecy.

Gowdy said he sent his initial letter to the State Department on
April 13 because he could not answer questions asked of him by constituents
regarding plans for refugees in Spartanburg.

“We have provided State’s response so the public can read it.
But some of the answers are inadequate and fail to provide specificity on who
was consulted at the city and county level, within the public school system,
and law enforcement, and if they provided input,” Gowdy said in a
statement.

Gowdy is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s
subcommittee on immigration and border security, which has oversight
responsibility for the refugee program.

The plan to place refugees in Spartanburg has been brewing for
more than a year, long before any local residents caught wind of it.

Kerry’s letter provides a rare window into how a small group of
people in the federal government, deceived local church groups, a federal
contractor and a Governor’s state refugee coordinator conspire to plant
“seedlings” of Muslim Jihadi Terrorists into communities across the U.S.

These refugees are seen by the White House and its network of
pro-immigration and refugee partners – treasonous groups like National Council
for La Raza, Welcoming America, the National Partnership for New Americans and
the Chamber of Commerce – as potential “new Americans.” The Muslim
Jihadists are set up with a full plate of government benefits paid for by your
tax dollars, and placed on a fast track to citizenship and full voting rights.

Obama is also pushing to have the thousands of Central Americans
who crossed the southern border last year afforded asylum status, which
qualifies them for various welfare benefits and a direct track toward
citizenship.

So while Spartanburg residents found out about the plan for
their town in March and April, others in key leadership positions have known
about it for more than a year. No public hearings have been held before the
city council or local school board. Gowdy is still trying to find out exactly
who in Spartanburg was made privy to the plans and who provided input.

“The initial interest in resettling refugees in Spartanburg
emerged in April 2013 when World Relief was approached by Spartanburg County
Baptist Network,” Kerry’s letter states. “The group, along with 25 other individuals
and church organizations, expressed their support for a World Relief
resettlement program in their city.”

Kerry said the State Department requires the national
resettlement agency, in this case World Relief, to “thoroughly assess the local
resettlement capacity and environment of any new proposed resettlement sites
before determining whether to proceed with resettling refugees in that
location.”

“Two community meetings (August
2014 and January 2015) were convened to discuss refugee resettlement in the
area,” Kerry wrote to Gowdy. “The August meeting, convened by World
Relief, was attended by 54 members of the community including Josh Dix from
your office, members of local churches, the Immigration Forum, and the
Convention and Visitors Bureau for Spartanburg. Mr. Dix did not offer any
concerns during the meeting or in follow-up afterward.”

Nazi Collaborator George Soros
involved:

The National Immigration
Forum, which was present at the meeting, receives funding from billionaire
George Soros. It is the driving force behind the so-called “Evangelical Immigration Table,”
or EIT.Breitbart called it“a front group for players on the institutional left including
billionaire George Soros and the Ford Foundation.” The Immigration Forum and EIT were involved in an
advertising campaign promoting the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill in 2013.

The South Carolina state refugee coordinator, who works for Gov.
Nikki Haley, gave her approval in November for the Muslim resettlement program
to move forward.

Christina Jeffrey, a political science instructor at
Wofford College in Spartanburg and former historian for the U.S. House of
Representatives, said Kerry’s response shows the refugee program is ingrained
not only in the federal bureaucracy but in state governments as well.

“It’s another grant
program; it isn’t just the feds cramming this down our throats. It’s government
corruption at all levels,” she said, “with
a lot of money at stake flowing to these contractors.”

Seeking a moratorium on
refugees

Jeffrey said she’s happy
that Gowdy has taken an interest in the program, but she believes his
responsibility goes beyond fact finding.

“I can do my own information gathering. I’m not looking to Trey
Gowdy for that. I’m looking for him to do his job and provide oversight on
whether this is a good use of taxpayers’ money,” Jeffrey said.

The so-called refugee (or terrorist import) program costs you
the taxpayer about $1 billion a year, and that does not include the welfare
benefits that many refugees receive. The Congressional Research Office recently
put out a study that showed 74.2 percent of refugees receive food stamps.

“Rather than just gathering information on the Spartanburg
resettlement, how about let’s put the whole program on hold until Congress has
a chance to investigate it?” Jeffrey said.

Jeffrey and others have also voiced concerns about
national security. Dozens of people from Muslim countries have come to America
as refugees only to be charged with providing material support to foreign
terrorist organizations, according to FBI reports. At least another 48 cases
have been confirmed of Muslim immigrants leaving the U.S. to fight for ISIS in
Syria and al-Shabab in Somalia.

The refugee programs have
flown under the radar for more than 30 years, but controversy flared in
February when a top FBI counter-terrorism official, Michael Steinbach,testified before the House Homeland Security
committeeand said “the U.S. has no way to vet
the Syrian refugees for possible connections to ISIS and other terrorist
organizations.”(And the wolf said to goldilocks
-“All the better
to eat you with my dear.) And Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, sent a
letter to the White House Jan. 28 citing “serious national security concerns”
about the Syrian refugee program and imploring Obama to not let it become a “back door for jihadists.”

Transforming America, into
Muslim States one at a time:

Jeffrey believes Obama is
using the so-called refugee program, along with its broader immigration
policies, for political purposes. “Their intention is to identify, recruit,
transport, whatever you have to do to get 9 million ‘new Americans’ naturalized
as citizens and to the polls in November.I’ve never seen a more blatant ballot-stuffing program in my life.”

THE BOTTOM LINE:If you haven’t yet read my series
titled “The Obama Connection” then I strongly recommend that you do. It’s a five part series of articles, rather
lengthy but shorter than a book, moreover, in reading this well documented
report on what is really going on in the world you will get the free education
of your life. It will also support ‘this article’ of Obama importing Muslim
ISIS terrorists into America under the pretext of benevolence towards
refugees. If this were true, then why are
only 8 percent of them - a token amount Christians - while thousands upon
thousands of these refugees are in fact Christians? Where are the Christians going?
Answer…nowhere. Obama was right about
one thing he said before his election, you didn’t listen then, maybe you will
listen now...or not! He said “This
will no longer be a Christian Nation, it will be a Muslim Nation.” Under Sharia Law!

I continually warn you to buy your prayer rug and Hijab now’
before there is a shortage.

PS. You might want to buy a gun as well. Why? To protect you
head my friend…

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

"The great enemy
of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest--
but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows
the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy

One
of my fellow US military veterans has been kicked out of a Mississippi
Christian College, and labeled as a ‘threat’ after requesting a “Non-Muslim
Counselor”.

This is how we thank young, brave American warriors who risked their
lives fighting for our freedom. Instead of giving them some simple respect, we
give our enemies that respect, as well as deference and submission.

Mississippi College is another Christian university that has been taken
over by Islamic jihadists. Located in
Clinton, Mississippi, just west of the capital city of Jackson it was founded
in 1826, MC is the second-oldest Baptist-affiliated College in the United
States and the oldest college in Mississippi. Now it is an Islamic madrassa.

A former active-duty Marine
who served two combat tours in Iraq and is diagnosed with combat-related
PTSD was suspended from Mississippi College in Clinton, Mississippi after
he requested to meet with a non-Muslim counselor in the school’s Office of
Counseling and Disability Services.

Is it any wonder that this
battle-weary student soldier would be more comfortable talking to a non-Muslim
counselor? And for that he is kicked out of school, and labeled a “threat.”

Some of our so-called Christian universities have become nothing but sewers
of hate and Islamic Jihadism.

May I suggest that you politely
contact the President of this once Christian University, Lee Gardner Royce.
Gently explain that returning vets deserve our love and respect. We don’t know
what this young hero has endured, but we do know it is ghastly. Wish him a good
Memorial Day. And ask why there are Muslim Counselors in a Christian
University.

Campus
Reform reportsthat a former active-duty Marine who served
two combat tours in Iraq and is diagnosed with combat-related PTSD was
suspended from Mississippi College in Clinton, Mississippi after he requested
to meet with a non-Muslim counselor in the school’s Office of Counseling and
Disability Services.

In addition to serving in the Marine Corps, Jeremy Rawls worked as a
private contractor in Afghanistan and was a member of the Army National Guard
for seven years. He was on active-duty in Iraq during the Second Battle
of Fallujah—named the bloodiest battle of the Iraq War—and says he’s lost
many friends to suicide due to PTSD.

Rawls, who is pursuing a degree in English with a minor in education,
was originally paired with a female counselor in traditional Muslim dress
during his initial visit. “It’s not that I didn’t want to
participate,” Rawls said. “I didn’t want to traumatize her and it
wasn’t a good environment to be talking about [my disabilities] with that
specific person.”

Since February, the senior has struggled to maintain good grades and
reclaim the work-study position he’d procured through the local VA after
administrators suspended him and labeled him a threat to himself and other
students. In an email notifying Rawls of his suspension, Associate Dean of
Students Jonathan Ambrose said administrators and the Student Intervention Team
have a due diligence in not only the protection of yourself, but also the
campus community as a whole from potential harm or the threat there of. You are
not permitted to be on campus for any reason or attend class during the
duration of the Interim Suspension unless you have written permission.

According to Rawls, the school never spoke with “a single professor”
about his grades or behavior prior to suspending and subsequently removing him
from the work-study position. “To have been a marine and to tell us we’re
a threat… that’s actually a compliment,” said Rawls. “But
telling me I’m a threat to others was extremely offensive.”

Rawls said his attempts to meet with staff members to discuss changing
counselors were repeatedly ignored until recently. “Their response was suspending me
pending a mental evaluation which I provided and then they put me on further
restriction and a ‘reintegration’ [brainwashing] program,” Rawls said.

Last Thursday Rawls met with administrators in an effort to begin
resolving the matter and to ensure that he is able to fully participate in
academics and extracurricular activities in the coming school year. “They
asked me what I wanted and I told them I want to be a normal student and I want
my job back,” Rawls said.

“If they’ll do this to me, and
I’m one of the most outspoken veterans on campus, they’ll definitely do this to
others,” Rawls said.

CAIR indecently has infiltrated the FBI and the Pentagon as well as
several other Federal security agencies, and also its murdering thugs have threatened
my’ life and the lives of my family for exposing them. And if that is not enough the FBI has threatened
me with arrest for exposing them.

THE BOTTOM LINE: How and why does this happen?
Well first of all it is not an isolated case. On the contrary, it is happening
all over the United States every day of the week. In public schools I can understand, because
we have a terrorist Islamic president and a government whose department of
education peddles the Islamic ideology of murder and mayhem. But my friend,
this is happening in Colleges and universities like this one that claim to be
Christian. Let me ask you…What is
Christian about this kind of behavior?

I’ll let you in on a little secret that so-called Christian
colleges don’t tell you. Follow the
money my friend. They are more and more
supported by Islamic terrorist organizations. Many come out of, or through the
terrorist supporting country of Qatar.
This is supposedly a very old and well established respected Baptist
University that has no respect whatsoever for American Christians but instead they
indorse the Muslim Satanic ideology.
Another even older so-called Catholic University, once a very well
respected College in Washington DC.
Maybe you have heard of it. It’s called Georgetown
U. -- made the mistake of accepting donations from Saudi Arabia. Today
it is totally dependent on moneys from Islamic terrorist organizations from all
over the Middle East. And today one
could not distinguish it from a Muslim Madrassa. They are incrementally
removing all the crucifixes from the halls and walls and auditorium because
they offend Muslims whose brothers are murdering Christians by the thousands. Your Muslim president wouldn’t
speak at Georgetownunless they covered the Crucifixes.

Sunday, May 24, 2015

"The great enemy
of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest--
but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows
the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy

Obama is not only at war with Christians in
America and the Middle East, he is at war with Christians everywhere. Even in his own country of Kenya.

Hundreds of pastors
in Kenya, Obama’s country of birth, have had enough of your President Barack
Obama’s perverted aggressive push to promote homosexuality in African nations and
forsake their religious convictions and fully embrace homosexual behavior and
same-sex “marriage.”

The 700 pastors of the Evangelical
Alliance of Kenya, welcomes Obama to visit their nation this summer — provided he stop pushing his immoral
agenda on Kenyans to forsake their religious convictions by endorsing the
homosexual lifestyle.

Bishop Mark Kariuki, a
megachurch pastor who advises some 700 pastors as the leader of the Evangelical
Alliance of Kenya, says what isn’t welcome is a repeat performance of Obama
scorning believers for not ascribing to his homosexual sodomy agenda. “…as
it has been his tendency whenever he comes to Africa.” Kariuki told
Kenya’sDaily
Nation newspaper on Monday.

Obama’s past directives to the
Kenyan nation — where he and his Muslim father were born — were not only
authoritative in nature, but disrespectful of Kenyans’ traditions and belief
systems.

“Obama should respect the faith,
culture and people of Kenya when he comes in July,” Karuiki implored. “He
should not put homosexuality as one of his main agendas in the country.”

Christians aren’t the only ones
in Kenya distrustful of Obama’s visit, as the Inter-Religious Council of Kenya
(IRCK), along with members of the Kenyan Parliament have scheduled a protest of
the president’s visit to a country that most people call his homeland.

“Showing more boldness in his
foreign policy when it comes to homosexuality than to his war on terror, Obama
is believed to be overstepping his authority and jurisdiction by making his
aggressive LGBT agenda the centerpiece of his international campaign —
especially throughout the African continent.” Said IRCK Chairman Adan Wachu.

“In June 2013, Obama provoked a
clash with the president of Senegal, Mackey Sall, over the nation's rejection
of the LGBT political agenda,”LifeSiteNews
reports. “Standing alongside Sall just the day after the U.S. Supreme Court
struck down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, Obama said that
people should be accorded rights based on ‘sexual orientation.’”

At that time, Obama insisted
that the world should adopt his’ endorsement of “LGBT rights,” declaring,
“And
that's a principle that I think applies universally.”

Obama may have skipped the land
of his forefathers on his $100-million African vacation in 2013, when he
condemned the continents’ nations for their “anti-homosexual” policies, but
Kenyan leaders nonetheless rebuked the president’s statements.

“Homosexuality goes against our
customs and traditions,” Kenya’s Deputy President William Ruto declared while speaking at
St. Gabriel’s Catholic Church in Maili Kumi. “We believe in God … This nation,
the nation of Kenya, is sovereign and God-fearing.”

A
call to destruction?

Archibishop of
Nairobi Cardinal John Njue called out Obama and other international leaders for
their role in the destruction of nations embracing the failed social experiment
of homosexuality.

“Those people who have already
ruined their society … let them not become our teachers to tell us where to
go,” urged
Njue, who also serves as president of the Kenyan Episcopal Conference. “I
think we need to act according to our own traditions and our faiths.”

LifeSiteNews’ Ben Johnson
reports. “It was neither the first nor the last time that the president decided
that advancing the homosexual agenda trumped indigenous African human rights
issues.”

Support
homosexuality … or else …

Using funding — or the
retraction of it — to persuade other nations to be on board with the worldwide
push to embrace homosexual behavior, Obama is doing all he can to normalize the
unbiblical practice around the world.

While serving at that time asWorld Congress of Familiesexecutive director years ago, Janice Shaw Crouse said that
Obama showed partiality to the LGBT, going against the religious
and cultural mores that nations have embraced for millennia globally.

“Obama’s actions are a form of
‘cultural imperialism’ — exporting the sexual crusade of a very small minority
of Americans with outsized influence who have tried to tear down the moral
foundations of our nation, as well as the rest of the world,” Crouse told LifeSiteNews in
2011.

Moreover, it has been noted that
Obama’s campaign to promote homosexuality has trumped his so-called war on terror. “Recently, both U.S. political and African
religious leaders say the Obama administration withheld aid to help Nigeria fight Boko
Haram, the Islamic terrorist organization, because the nation rejects same-sex
‘marriage,’”
Johnson recounted.

It is believed that, if elected,
leading Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will follow in
Obama’s footsteps when it comes to pushing the homosexual agenda both
domestically and abroad. “There is a whole movement in which many
people in the Obama administration are involved — Hillary Clinton at the
forefront — that is pushing the ‘sexual rights’ agenda,” asserted
Sharon Slater, who producedCultural
Imperialism: The Sexual Rights Agenda.

“African political leaders were
being blackmailed, bribed and bullied into accepting sexual rights that run
counter to their religious and cultural values.”

Corroborating Christians’ and
conservatives’ fears that former secretary of state Clinton would follow up
Obama’s full-fledged propagation of the homosexual agenda, she candidly
proclaimed last month that faiths opposed to homosexual
behavior must denounce the moral precepts undergirding their beliefs derived
from their holy scriptures.

So…According to your pervert Muslim president, fighting Islamic
terror is contingent upon the promotion of the practice of LGBT. If his Muslim Brothers heard that they would hang
him upside down and set him on fire.

This poor excuse for a deviant Muslim is more perverted than
his own prophet.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email
list. It may be the only chance for your
friends to hear the truth.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

"The great enemy
of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest--
but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows
the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy

If you have never read my articles or anything about Islam…or
even if you have, you really need to watch these videos of a very good friend
of mine who calls herself Bridget Gabriel.
As I have said so many times in the past, there are only a very few
people on the earth including Muslims themselves that really understand what Islam
is about, and Bridget is one of them.

In the first video she speaks to an audience of 500 United
Nation leaders at the UN in New York. And
note that she pulls no punches. She simply tells the truth that most of them
have likely never heard with such authority.

The second video actually follows the first, if you just
stand by, or the URL is below. She speaks to Jimmy Swaggert about what America is
facing regarding Islam. The ignorance and
deception that the west has fallen into. Listen closely to what Bridget has to say how Lebanon
was a parallel to America and now America is now a parallel to the mistakes that
Lebanon did.

Thursday, May 21, 2015

“Although all men are born free, slavery has been the
general lot of the human race. Ignorant --they
have been cheated. Asleep -- they have been surprised. Divided -- the yoke has been forced upon
them. But what is the lesson? …the
people ought to be enlightened, to be awakened, to be united, that after
establishing a government they should watch over it....It is universally
admitted that a well --instructed people alone, can be permanently free.”-James Madison

Christians
and the Coming Tyranny

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:

Published May 21, 2015

Does the Bible teach total passiveness when it comes to
tyrants? The Jews thought so up until the
year 1945, and just look at what happened to them? While the Scriptures teaches
that it is proper to obey those in authority over us, it also teaches us to
rebel against any unlawful order, excluding us from being total subjects of
tyranny.

In the past I have discussed the biblical principle of
Christian resistance for example as it relates to the upcoming Supreme Court
decision on same-sex marriage. As I pointed out there are examples in the Bible
of God’s people resisting direct commands by civil officials based on a very
specific set of higher law principles.

Christian apologist Francis A. Schaeffer wrote: “Let
us not forget why the Christians were killed. They werenotkilled because
they worshipped Jesus... Nobody cared who worshipped whom as long as the
worshipper did not disrupt the unity of the state, centered in the formal
worship of Caesar. The reason Christians were killed was because they were
rebels”1and placed the god
of the Bible over the claim that the State and its Caesars were gods. The
proof?: “they all act contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is
another king, Jesus” (Acts 17:7).

Contrary to what many people have been told, King James of
the King James Bible wanted a translation that countered the notes in the 1559
Geneva Bible, the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims. Not just to translate the
Bible into the English language. The Geneva Bible was already in English. “For example, the margin notes for Daniel 6:22
imply that the commands of kings are to be disobeyed if they conflict with the
law of God: ‘For he [Daniel] disobeyed the king’s wicked commandment in order
to obey God, and so he did no injury to the king, who ought to command nothing
by which God would be dishonored.’”2

Alister McGrath comments:

“Notice also how the Genevan notes regularly use the word
‘tyrant’ to refer to kings; the King James Bibleneveruses this word—a fact noted with approval as much as relief
by many royalists at this point.”3

It’s no wonder that King James authorized a fresh
translation of the Bible to undermine the republican implications of the Geneva
Bible. 4

Because of its no exception tone, Romans 13 is seen as
prohibiting all resistance to the law of the State: "Let every person be in
subjection to the governing authorities. . .” (v. 1). The apostle lists
no exceptions. Peter makes a similar statement: "Submit yourselves for the
Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in
authority, or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and
the praise of those who do right" (1 Peter 2:13-14). Again, no
exceptions. This is the same Peter who declared, "We must obey God rather
than men" (Acts 5:29; cf. 4:19-20). How do we reconcile thisapparentcontradiction?

Jonathan Mayhew (1720-1766) states the following in his
1750 sermon “Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher
Powers”:

“Thus, upon a careful review of the apostle's reasoning in this
passage, it appears that his arguments to enforce submission, are of such a nature,
as to conclude only in favor of submission to such rulers as he himself
describes; i.e., such as rule for the
good of society, which is the only end of their institution. Common tyrants,
and public oppressors, are not entitled to obedience from their subjects, by
virtue of anything here laid down by the inspired apostle.”

There are a number of places in Scripture where one verse speaks
in absolute terms and other verses offer exceptions. This is not unusual. If I
tell my grandchildren to go outside and play until dinner is ready, I have
spoken in absolute terms. They are not to come into the house until they are
called. No exceptions are given. What if it rains? What if a large dog enters
the yard? Can they enter the house without violating my absolute and no
exception command?

They would not be violating the “no exception” command because
there areunspokenexceptions. They are assumed to
be operating without them having to be repeated each time a new command is
given. They have been told on previous occasions to "come in when it's
raining" and "do not get near stray dogs that wander into the yard.

The Bible operates in the same manner. In one place Jesus says, "All
those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword" (Matt.
26:52). Does this include the civil magistrate? What about the person who
strikes an assailant in self-defense? Is this not an exception to Jesus' “no
exception” statement? Since the Bible already discusses self-defense (Ex.
22:2-3; Deut. 19:21) and the role of the civil magistrate (e.g., Gen. 9:6),
there is no need to repeat the exceptions since Jesus’ hearers knew He has
anarchy and revolution in mind (e.g., Lev. 19:18), not the just use of the
sword. Romans 13:4 explains that it is thedutyof the civil magistrate to use
the sword in certain specified cases. Is this a contradiction? No.

So then, when we read passages like Romans 13:1 and 1 Peter
2:13-14, we must not neglect the rest of the Bible that is equally
authoritative and more fully explains and qualifies these passages.

“Many general statements of Scripture must be open to admitting
exceptions even those qualifications are not immediately spelled out. Why are
so many generalizations stated without qualification?Because the exact conditions
restricting their applicability are not known, or because the
"accidental" or providential circumstances that render them
inapplicable occur so seldom as to be practically negligible, or because such
qualification has already been stipulated in another inscripturated context.”5

THE BOTTOM LINE:We must recognize that as the
State becomes more and more despotic and non-Christian in its social and
political policies, conflicts between church and State will multiply. That
conflict may make it necessary for Christians to say no’ to statist laws that
will force them to violate the laws of God as well as their own constitution,
forcing the people to choose just which laws they are going to recognize.

There is an additional reason why Christians must understand the
limits of civil jurisdictionandthe limits of resistance. Because of a desire to see the current
corruption in our own nation reversed, some Christians may take it upon
themselves to bring about change by revolutionary means. While the Spirit of
revolution is unbiblical, but as the patriots in early America had tyranny
thrust upon them with only the alternative to obey or die, we must look to the
exception of self-defense and self-preservation.

How Christians go about resisting is a question that needs to be
answered in exacting detail. The fact that we have lesser magistrates – state
governments, governors, and state constitutions – that can serve as legitimate
governing authorities as a means to rebuff civil and judicial tyranny is a
viable governing avenue for Christians to take.
But what if those in authority violate their own laws???

Think about it, my Thanks
for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email
list. It may be the only chance for your
friends to hear the truth.

“For God shall bring every work into the judgment concerning
every hidden thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil.”(Ecclesiastes
12:14)

Let me make one thing perfectly clear before you start reading this
article. Negotiations and or treaties
with Muslims are ignorant, futile and dangerous. Read the Muslim Hadith. If you think otherwise, then please give me
one example of a lasting treaty with any Muslim organization and/or country. The only wise approach to Iran is to order
them to unconditionally cease a nuclear endeavor of any kind. Iran’s so-called
need for peacetime nuclear power is a ruse, they have sufficient cheap power in
fossil fuel for an eternity.

The Western allies should order Iran to destroy all of their centrifuges
now’, or face total isolation and if they still refuse, they will be annihilated,
no threat, just fact. It is the only
language that Islam understands. It is the only deal one can make with
terrorists. We do have a policy of not
negotiating with terrorists, then why are we negotiating. I will again tell you why! Obama totally understands that what I just
said is true, but you must see that Obama’s deal is not to stop Iran, OBAMA’S DEAL, IS TO IMPOWER IRAN
AND DESTROY THE WEST!

Obama has known for
years that Iran is just months away from a nuclear bomb, yet he kept it to himself until
it was convenient, reportedBloombergTuesday.

According to the
report, the Obama administration has long estimated a two- to three-month
breakout time, yet only declassified this information April 1, 2015 “just
in time for the White House to make the case for itsIran dealto Congress and the public”.

Energy Secretary
Ernest Moniz acknowledged to the news agency that the US has known for “quite
some time” that Iran is closer to a bomb than the administration has
let on. He added that Iran is “right now spinning, I mean enriching with
9,400 centrifuges out of their roughly 19,000. Plus all the . . . . R&D
work. If you put that together it’s very, very little time to go forward.
That’s the 2-3 months” estimated for Iran to produce enough fissile
material for a nuclear weapon.

Yet all this time,
Obama has insisted that Iran was not nearly that close to achieving a nuclear
bomb.Back in 2013, before a visit to Israel, Obama told Israel’sChannel Two, “Right now, we think it would take over a
year or so for Iran to actually develop a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t
want to cut it too close.”

That same year, in an
effort to downplay Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s more alarmist
estimate of six months, but Obama told theAssociated Pressin October, “Our assessment continues to be a year or
more away. And in fact, actually, our estimate is probably more conservative
than the estimates of Israeli intelligence services.” I was In Israel
at the time.

David Albright, a
former weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and
International Security, told Eli Lake atBloombergthat he felt the administration was being intentionally
vague in 2013.

“They weren’t clear at all about
what this one-year estimate meant, but people like me who said let’s break it
down to the constituent pieces in terms of time to build a bomb were rebuffed,” he said. Albright and his group
came up with their own estimate, measuring only the production of highly
enriched uranium, concluding that Iran was a mere month away.

A spokeswoman for the
National Security Council downplayed Albright’s numbers toUSA Today, saying the intelligence
community maintains “a number of assessments” of the time Iran needs to become a
nuclear threat.

Albright’s position,
however, is supported by leaked International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
document, first published by theAssociated Pressin 2009. It concluded Iran “has sufficient information to be
able to design and produce a workable implosion nuclear device based upon
(highly enriched uranium) as the fission fuel.”

Kenneth Pollack, a
former CIA analyst who is now an Iran expert at the Brookings Institution, told
Lake that estimating breakout times is an imprecise business. “The
idea there is such a thing as a hard and fast formula for this is nonsense,”
he said. “All the physicists come up with different answers depending on what
inputs they use.” Bear in mind
that the Brookings Institution is affiliated with and supported by the Muslim
Brotherhood operating out of Doha Qatar.
This makes Obama’s manipulative use of a foreshortened timeline all the
more sinister.

On April 2, Obama
identified one benefit of thenuclear framework deal, saying, “even if it violated the deal, for the next
decade at least, Iran would be a minimum of a year away from acquiring enough
material for a bomb.” Obama
knows darn well that Iran will in fact violate any deal, he has read the Muslim
Hadith and follows it to the max.

Representative Devin
Nunes, the Republican chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence doesn’t buy it. “We’ve been researching [the
administration’s] claim that a deal would lengthen the breakout time for Iran
from two to three months to a year,” he told Lake. “We’re just trying to confirm any
of their numbers and we can’t confirm or make sense of what they are
referencing.”

Israel has
consistently maintained that a nuclear Iran is a dire threat to the security of
the entire world, and that successive US agreements with the Islamic Republic
have put Israel in grave danger. Netanyahu has said on numerous occasions that “Israel
will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability,” or
endanger Israeli citizens.

Allowing
Iran to achieve nuclear capability is exactly the same as ISIS having a nuclear
weapon. Iran is simply using and
supporting ISIS to carry out its dirty work in the Middle east, the Sinai
Peninsula and in North Africa, and eventually Europe and America.

Whether one believes in a literal Armageddon or not, I don’t
believe that anyone could possibly ignore the danger of Iran/ISIS with a
nuclear weapon.

THE
BOTTOM LINE: One would have to be willfully and wantonly ignorant
not to see the picture unfolding right in front of us. I have claimed since Obama first ran for
president, that he would do everything he could to destroy America and promote
the World Nation of Islam. This is just another piece of the enormity of
evidence that Obama is the enemy of Western freedom, culture and liberty.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email
list. It may be the only chance for your
friends to hear the truth.