Once again we see the replacement of bad with worse. Much worse. There is no more bloody, brutal, inhuman system than Islamic jihad and the sharia.

Explosive Videos Reveal That The Syrian Revolution is Plain Evil

By Theodore Shoebat, August 21, 2012

We have gathered from Arab sources explosive and horrific
videos captured by the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian rebels. While
what we present is a fraction of what we have, the evidence will show
that contrary to the praise of many in the West, the footage illustrates their wanton
cruelty, and their absence of any sentiment for human suffering; masses
gathered in lynching festivals, human beings chopped up like animals,
executions without trials, all done under the shouts of Allahu Akbar.
Masses are seen demonstrating with the same Islamist banners of
al-Qaeda, and people are ritually slaughtered by the rebels. In this
rough documentary, we complied the bulk of this footage to show to the
West the savagery of these rebels, and the utterly dark future for not
just Syria, but for the Near East as a whole if the Islamists dominate
the region.

These atrocities are continuous in Syria; but still a good amount of
thinkers and politicians express their support for the rebels, and their
want for U.S. intervention and aid.

But from the footage linked in this article, it is only obvious
that the peace of the world will only be assaulted if the
revolutionaries of Syria are given the aid and sympathies of the West.
Such condoning and praise will only empower the rebels to keep fighting, increasing their confidence that their Islamic government will vanquish Syria.

The current policy against Syria has not sufficed for senators John Mccain, Joseph Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham, who together released a statement calling for military intervention, and weapons and ammunition supply for the rebels:

What opposition groups in Syria need most urgently
is relief from Assad’s tank and artillery sieges in many cities that are
still contested. Providing military assistance to the Free Syrian Army and other opposition groups is necessary, but as Assad continues to intensify his assault, that alone will not be sufficient to stop the slaughter and save innocent lives. The only realistic way to do so is with foreign airpower.

It would be only dangerous for the U.S. to lend support militarily to the Free Syrian Army; for this group is but an oppressor, kidnapping, torturing,
and murdering any who are against their cause. The targets are
counter-revolutionaries, Christians, Shia, Alawites, and government
workers. But nevertheless, these three senators
have been vocal with intense opinions on giving weaponry, ammunition,
and air support, as they make clear in their own statement:

The ultimate goal of airstrikes should be to protect
civilian population centers from Assad’s killing machine and establish
safe havens in which opposition forces can organize, rest, refit, and
plan their political and military activities against Assad. These safe
havens could serve as platforms for the delivery of humanitarian and
military assistance – including weapons and ammunition, body armor and
other personal protective equipment, tactical intelligence, secure
communications equipment, food and water, and medical supplies. These safe havens could also help the Free Syrian Army and other armed groups in Syria to train and organize themselves into more
cohesive and effective military forces, likely with the assistance of
foreign partners, and provide political space for the Syrian National
Council to organize on Syrian soil.

If this plan is ever executed, then the U.S. would only be making the same mistake it did with Afghanistan: supplying weapons to rebels so that they may topple their current government. But, the plan is absent of any prudence, since it does not take into consideration what sort of government the rebels themselves would establish if they are victorious. It is also necessary to keep in mind that the leaders of the Syrian National Council (SNC), whom the quoted statement speaks positively of, have now went into exile. Therefore, it is irresponsible to place trust on the Free Syrian Army when the SNC, once a major funder for the revolution, are now an enemy of the rebels.

Moreover, the politicians who are in support of the Syrian revolution have not looked to the
example of Egypt. The Egyptian revolution had obtained the praise of
the mainstream media, and politicians such as Hillary Clinton
and Barack Obama, who had saw the revolt as a cause for freedom and
democracy. But once the people of Egypt were given the option of
partaking in democratic elections, the majority had voted for Muhammad
Mursi, thus having the Muslim Brotherhood take control of the nation.
The revolution of Egypt is interconnected with the present revolt of
Syria. Nizamaddin Taj, a former member of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party
(PKK), made it quite clear in a recent interview:

The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria is the only party that
can seize power after the collapse of Assad, but Israel, the U.S. and
Europe are very worried about the Muslim Brotherhood of Syria and
believe that they are different than the Muslim Brotherhood groups of
Egypt and Tunisia.

The network between the Muslim Brotherhood and the rebels is clearly
shown by the financial support, and the provisions of weapons and
ammunition, which the former is giving the latter. But sadly, few in
intellectual circles have realized that the revolution in Egypt is a
foreshadowing of what will happen in Syria if the Assad regime is
ousted.

Conservative talk
show host Dennis Prager, as much as I agree with him on many issues,
has mistakenly taken the side of the revolution, saying in one episode:

I cannot envision anything worse than the Assad family

But by watching the footage shown in the documentary, it is most
obvious that there truly is something worse than Assad, and that is
Islamic fundamentalism.

With all of the reports recently presented on Syria, the most
lacking element is the truth on the Syrian rebels. The sympathy and
praise for the revolutionaries is reminiscent to the
high esteem which certain individuals had for the French Revolution in
the Eighteenth Century. But when the nature of the rebels in Syria is
finally revealed, hopefully many will realize the cruel and conquering
spirit of these renegades, just as numerous persons were disturbed at
the use of the guillotines by the revolutionaries in France, who had
caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of their own countrymen.

The misconception which has largely been subscribed to by our culture, is that dictatorship is automatically wrong, and thus deserves to be toppled;
while a nation governed by the people is always a pure aspiration
worthy of being fought for. But, this is certainly not the case for all
nations. Governance at the hands of the people, is only safe if the
bearers of power respect the spirit of liberty. While dictatorship
is at times a necessary evil for a country where the people, at any
given moment, may arise and shatter the rights of the individual,
enforce collectivism, and rule by the might of the mob. Syria, at this
time, is defending itself from an internal invasion by a multitude of
violent and warlike bandits. Surely if the power of Bashar al-Assad, the
current dictator of Syria, was toppled, the supposed totalitarianism of the government will be far surpassed by the rebels, who will rule purely by the creeds of the Koran.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c60bf53ef0177444c46f3970d

Comments

Once again we see the replacement of bad with worse. Much worse. There is no more bloody, brutal, inhuman system than Islamic jihad and the sharia.

Explosive Videos Reveal That The Syrian Revolution is Plain Evil

By Theodore Shoebat, August 21, 2012

We have gathered from Arab sources explosive and horrific
videos captured by the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian rebels. While
what we present is a fraction of what we have, the evidence will show
that contrary to the praise of many in the West, the footage illustrates their wanton
cruelty, and their absence of any sentiment for human suffering; masses
gathered in lynching festivals, human beings chopped up like animals,
executions without trials, all done under the shouts of Allahu Akbar.
Masses are seen demonstrating with the same Islamist banners of
al-Qaeda, and people are ritually slaughtered by the rebels. In this
rough documentary, we complied the bulk of this footage to show to the
West the savagery of these rebels, and the utterly dark future for not
just Syria, but for the Near East as a whole if the Islamists dominate
the region.

These atrocities are continuous in Syria; but still a good amount of
thinkers and politicians express their support for the rebels, and their
want for U.S. intervention and aid.

But from the footage linked in this article, it is only obvious
that the peace of the world will only be assaulted if the
revolutionaries of Syria are given the aid and sympathies of the West.
Such condoning and praise will only empower the rebels to keep fighting, increasing their confidence that their Islamic government will vanquish Syria.

The current policy against Syria has not sufficed for senators John Mccain, Joseph Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham, who together released a statement calling for military intervention, and weapons and ammunition supply for the rebels:

What opposition groups in Syria need most urgently
is relief from Assad’s tank and artillery sieges in many cities that are
still contested. Providing military assistance to the Free Syrian Army and other opposition groups is necessary, but as Assad continues to intensify his assault, that alone will not be sufficient to stop the slaughter and save innocent lives. The only realistic way to do so is with foreign airpower.

It would be only dangerous for the U.S. to lend support militarily to the Free Syrian Army; for this group is but an oppressor, kidnapping, torturing,
and murdering any who are against their cause. The targets are
counter-revolutionaries, Christians, Shia, Alawites, and government
workers. But nevertheless, these three senators
have been vocal with intense opinions on giving weaponry, ammunition,
and air support, as they make clear in their own statement:

The ultimate goal of airstrikes should be to protect
civilian population centers from Assad’s killing machine and establish
safe havens in which opposition forces can organize, rest, refit, and
plan their political and military activities against Assad. These safe
havens could serve as platforms for the delivery of humanitarian and
military assistance – including weapons and ammunition, body armor and
other personal protective equipment, tactical intelligence, secure
communications equipment, food and water, and medical supplies. These safe havens could also help the Free Syrian Army and other armed groups in Syria to train and organize themselves into more
cohesive and effective military forces, likely with the assistance of
foreign partners, and provide political space for the Syrian National
Council to organize on Syrian soil.

If this plan is ever executed, then the U.S. would only be making the same mistake it did with Afghanistan: supplying weapons to rebels so that they may topple their current government. But, the plan is absent of any prudence, since it does not take into consideration what sort of government the rebels themselves would establish if they are victorious. It is also necessary to keep in mind that the leaders of the Syrian National Council (SNC), whom the quoted statement speaks positively of, have now went into exile. Therefore, it is irresponsible to place trust on the Free Syrian Army when the SNC, once a major funder for the revolution, are now an enemy of the rebels.

Moreover, the politicians who are in support of the Syrian revolution have not looked to the
example of Egypt. The Egyptian revolution had obtained the praise of
the mainstream media, and politicians such as Hillary Clinton
and Barack Obama, who had saw the revolt as a cause for freedom and
democracy. But once the people of Egypt were given the option of
partaking in democratic elections, the majority had voted for Muhammad
Mursi, thus having the Muslim Brotherhood take control of the nation.
The revolution of Egypt is interconnected with the present revolt of
Syria. Nizamaddin Taj, a former member of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party
(PKK), made it quite clear in a recent interview:

The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria is the only party that
can seize power after the collapse of Assad, but Israel, the U.S. and
Europe are very worried about the Muslim Brotherhood of Syria and
believe that they are different than the Muslim Brotherhood groups of
Egypt and Tunisia.

The network between the Muslim Brotherhood and the rebels is clearly
shown by the financial support, and the provisions of weapons and
ammunition, which the former is giving the latter. But sadly, few in
intellectual circles have realized that the revolution in Egypt is a
foreshadowing of what will happen in Syria if the Assad regime is
ousted.

Conservative talk
show host Dennis Prager, as much as I agree with him on many issues,
has mistakenly taken the side of the revolution, saying in one episode:

I cannot envision anything worse than the Assad family

But by watching the footage shown in the documentary, it is most
obvious that there truly is something worse than Assad, and that is
Islamic fundamentalism.

With all of the reports recently presented on Syria, the most
lacking element is the truth on the Syrian rebels. The sympathy and
praise for the revolutionaries is reminiscent to the
high esteem which certain individuals had for the French Revolution in
the Eighteenth Century. But when the nature of the rebels in Syria is
finally revealed, hopefully many will realize the cruel and conquering
spirit of these renegades, just as numerous persons were disturbed at
the use of the guillotines by the revolutionaries in France, who had
caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of their own countrymen.

The misconception which has largely been subscribed to by our culture, is that dictatorship is automatically wrong, and thus deserves to be toppled;
while a nation governed by the people is always a pure aspiration
worthy of being fought for. But, this is certainly not the case for all
nations. Governance at the hands of the people, is only safe if the
bearers of power respect the spirit of liberty. While dictatorship
is at times a necessary evil for a country where the people, at any
given moment, may arise and shatter the rights of the individual,
enforce collectivism, and rule by the might of the mob. Syria, at this
time, is defending itself from an internal invasion by a multitude of
violent and warlike bandits. Surely if the power of Bashar al-Assad, the
current dictator of Syria, was toppled, the supposed totalitarianism of the government will be far surpassed by the rebels, who will rule purely by the creeds of the Koran.