NSA’s phone record
collecting is legal despite chance of imperiling ‘civil liberties of
every citizen’: judge

The National Security Agency’s bulk
collection of millions of Americans’ telephone records “only works [to
counter the threat of terrorism] because it collects everything,” a
judge has ruled.

NEW YORK — A federal judge on Friday found that the National Security
Agency’s bulk collection of millions of Americans’ telephone records is
legal and a valuable part of the nation’s arsenal to counter the threat
of terrorism and “only works because it collects everything.”

Ontario Parents need to be aware the the perils the civil liberties
of every parent and child are threatened daily by the Corrupt vile,
secretive private unaccountable private Ontario Corporations called "The
Children's Aid Societies of Ontario".

But the judge noted that such a program, if unchecked, “imperils the
civil liberties of every citizen” and said it was up to the executive
and legislative branches of power to decide whether it should be used.

The decision contrasts with a ruling earlier this month by another
U.S. District Court judge, Richard Leon, who granted a preliminary
injunction against the collecting of phone records of two men who had
challenged the program. Leon said the program likely violates the
Constitution’s ban on unreasonable search. The judge has since stayed
the effect of his ruling, pending a government appeal.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge William Pauley said in a written
opinion that the program “represents the government’s counter-punch” to
eliminate Al-Qaeda’s terror network by connecting fragmented and
fleeting communications.

“This blunt tool only works because it collects everything,” Pauley
said. “The collection is broad, but the scope of counterterrorism
investigations is unprecedented.”

Pauley dismissed a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties
Union. Attorney Brett Max Kaufman said the right group will appeal

The ACLU sued earlier this year after former NSA analyst Edward
Snowden leaked details of the secret programs that critics say violate
privacy rights. The NSA-run programs pick up millions of telephone and
Internet records that are routed through American networks each day.

An ACLU lawyer had argued that the government’s interpretation of its
authority under the Patriot Act was so broad that it could justify the
mass collection of financial, health and even library records of
innocent Americans without their knowledge, including whether they had
used a telephone sex hotline, contemplated suicide, been addicted to
gambling or drugs or supported political causes.

A government lawyer had countered that counterterrorism investigators
wouldn’t find most personal information useful.

Pauley said there were safeguards in place, including the fact the
NSA cannot query the phone database it collects without legal
justification and is limited in how much it can learn.

The judge said the mass collection of phone data “significantly
increases the NSA’s capability to detect the faintest patterns left
behind by individuals affiliated with foreign terrorist organizations.
Armed with all the metadata, NSA can draw connections it might otherwise
never be able to find.”

He added that such a program, if unchecked, “imperils the civil
liberties of every citizen” and he noted the lively public debate about
the subject.

“The question for this court is whether the government’s bulk
telephony metadata program is lawful. This court finds it is. But the
question of whether that program should be conducted is for the other
two co-ordinate branches of government to decide,” he said.

In his ruling, the judge noted the Sept. 11, 2011 terrorist attacks
and how the phone data-collection system could have helped investigators
connect information before the attacks occurred.

“The government learned from its mistake and adapted to confront a
new enemy: a terror network capable of orchestrating attacks across the
world. It launched a number of counter-measures, including a bulk
telephony metadata collection program — a wide net that could find and
isolate gossamer contacts among suspected terrorists in an ocean of
seemingly disconnected data,” he said.

Their absolute power continues to this day except it costs Ontario One
Billion Dollars a year in direct costs and a staggering additional
billions of dollars that is spent on the indirect secondary effects of
this criminal organization who habitually fabricate evidence to justify
their own bureaucracy with ever increasing funding that is to satisfy
the every increasing numbers of staff and unfortunately, the number of
children needlessly and criminally taken into care most of the time,
without legal justification.

These out of control child abusers, have their own secret courts, their
own judges who "rubber stamp" anything they want.

These criminals engage in unjustified defamation of parents by alluding
that parents are a danger of harm to their children most of the time,
without any justification or real evidence.

when it comes to evidence, these lowest forms of life habitually
fabricate evidence.

Take the Children's Aid Society of Ottwa Lawyer Marguerite Isobel Lewis
who fabricates evidence, omits evidence before former CAS lawyers turned
judges to keep a child in care, apparently to protect fabrication of
evidence by a Rogue Child Protection Worker Phillip Hiltz-Laforge who
fabricates evidence as though its all in a days work.

There are many victims of the above who are too scared to come forward,
the terror that the above cause to parents is unimaginable to most
parents who have never had the misfortune of being the victim of
Ontario's Child Abuse Society.

If you know of someone who has been the victim of Phillip Hiltz-Laforge
or Marguerite Isobel Lewis or any other employee of the Children's Aid
Societies of Ontario, please email StopCASdotca@Gmail.com or call (613)
366-7580 and leave a contact number.