Shaun: can you hear us?
... Wrote an email to a list with a safe subset of regex
character classes. It is smaller in features than anticipated,
but for six engines, that is what it wa.
... When we last spoke, I'm not sure what the decision was.

Arle: No decision taken in
Prague.

Shaun: I will continue and try to
write a portable regular expression to describe the portable
regular expression. We don't want to accidentally use a feature
in some engine.

Arle: We will have to go to
another last call anyway, so we can continue.

Christian: Before moving on, I
haven't checked on the connection between canonical XML,
Unicode normalization, and regular expression.

Shaun: In general, regex is a
mess with respect to Unicode normalization.
..Example: E + combining acute, if U+00E9 matches is up to the
regex engine and whether it handles normalization.
... It is a huge mess. I would strongly recommend that people
normalize their Unicode.

Christian: This is good
information. Makes a stronger case for Unicode
normalization.

Shaun: Would normally recommend
normalization at every step. If there are chains where people
don't do this, perhaps they have reasons. So I don't know if we
say we MUST normalize, or if it is best practice.
... I would like to hear from people who make non-normalized
Unicode. I don't know who they are and if there are
problems.

Christian: Maybe this explanation
could be in a similar place where we had it for ITS 1.0.

Marcis: If I recall, we discussed
that the definition element is a sub-category of term, since
you need a definition in HTML content, and only then can you
use <dfn>, so we left with the understanding that it is
in best-practice and not in the normative section.

Arle: Can't point to EN-15038.
Out of scope. TS-11669 is more relevant, defines expectations
about translation.
... Recommendation was to address quality in framework of
TS-11669. That is be listed as an example of what the quality
profile might point to, at a minimum.

Christian: I still don't get the
difference between metrics and expectations, metrics,
etc.
... Explained some about it.
... I think it changes the semantics of the pointer. IF you use
parameters instead of metric.