After hundreds of Occupy Oakland protesters were tear-gassed and shot at with rubber-coated steel bullets by riot police on October 25, protesters in Tahrir Square marched to
the US embassy in protest. One of their signs read: "Cairo and Oakland are one hand."

At the next Oakland march, a black banner with white writing appeared: "Oakland and Cairo are one fist."

The change reflects the state of Occupy Oakland: a tactical perspective has
elbowed to the forefront, leaving others bruised and annoyed along the way.

"Your open hand can do so much more than your fist," says occupier Laura Long, 29. But it's unclear right now what exactly Occupy Oakland wants to do,
because it's unclear right now what and who Occupy Oakland might currently be.

Since the war that took over downtown Oakland that evening in October, Occupy Oakland has struggled with how to spend its political capital, and has
lost much of it along the way. Several camp iterations and broken windows later, Oakland's occupiers are at a crossroads now in the movement --
and they aren't interested in sticking together. While the main decision-making body of the group, the general assembly, falters with low attendance,
action meetings are growing. A couple weeks ago this disaggregation seemed like a death knell. Now it feels like the movement's best hope.

The breakup seems necessary after such a passionate escalation in tactics over a relatively short period of time. The period of
infatuation and political lust that intensified leading up to the November 2 General Strike ended quickly, and many fell out of love after windows started breaking.

This period of reflection and reconsideration is resulting in a multi-front movement that engages the public with spectacular shows
of force at the ports, and with quiet and plausibly deniable ones in the form of smashed locks on empty bank-owned buildings.

In Oakland's occupation there are some hands, and there are some fists.

***

Occupy organizer Krystof Lopaur, 35, worked on the December 12 coordinated West Coast port shutdown, which disrupted port activities up and
down the coast and catalyzed solidarity protests across the country. In Oakland, Occupy disrupted and cancelled three of the ILWU workers shifts
and blocked trucking in efforts that the port says cost them, workers, and the city of Oakland $4 million. Nearly 4,500 people shut down the Port
of Oakland in the evening. Krystof calls the action Occupy Oakland's "second big act" after the November 2nd General Strike and one-shift
port shutdown. "And this is where it's at," he says of the future.

"There's a lot of stuff that we're doing that's interesting. We're kind of probing around for where we're effective," Krystof reflected. "And I think where we're effective
is where we get the most pushback."

The shutdown was a huge show of force by Occupy and union workers that many expected would be met with a huge show of force in return from the police. This sort
of confrontation is meant to force the state's hand, to create, as Martin Luther King, Jr. put it, "a situation so crisis-packed
that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation." Occupy may be less interested in negotiation, but they are no less interested in creating
that crisis. But except for some 6 a.m. baton scuffles, law enforcement presence was minimal, even if the shutdown resulted in the city council's rules committee pushing the city to use "whatever lawful tools" to prevent any future port action. (The resolution did not pass.)

The shutdown was grand and visible. It contrasts markedly with the other threads of action that have spun out of Occupy Oakland. Take foreclosure defense, in which occupiers set up camps at or in properties scheduled to be taken over by the banks. The most high-profile effort occurred at 18th and Linden in West Oakland, when a lot owner, Gloria Cobb allowed occupiers to take over the space. It made the local news and seemed like it could become a new and successful tactic for activists. It was a highly visible political symbol, one of Occupy Oakland's last above-ground hurrahs. And it
was also one of its greatest failures.

After giving initial lukewarm approval for the occupation, the lot ownerGloria
Cobb signed a declaration for the city stating
that she wanted them removed. The occupiers left reluctant and
angry, with a mix of wounded pride and sincere shame. This was Occupy
Oakland's last
real stab at a tent encampment. At least they went out loud: the botched foreclosure occupation ended with a dance
party in the middle of a West Oakland street at midnight.

Dancing aside, things did not go well. "That's what inspired me to do this," says Iris Brown, 26, as
she flips through one of many binders sitting on a shelf in the small
warm kitchen of an
occupied house in Alameda, each marked with a different zip
code. "Watching that play out so badly."

Iris began the Foreclosure Research Action Committee (FRAC) in
hopes of intervening on behalf of people in pre-foreclosure using legal
means largely
outlined under the Tenant Protection Act of 2010, as well as finding empty foreclosed buildings to occupy for full-time residential
occupations as well as community centers open to the public and meant to serve the surrounding neighborhood.

The failure of 18th and Linden was not Iris' only motivation,
though. Two months ago, the owner of her quaint Alameda house went into
default, and sold
Iris' lease to a new tenant for a much higher rent. Since she
was never properly served with an eviction notice, Iris filed a motion
to quash, and is
now waiting for her court date before the scheduled February 12
auction of the house.

"This is what I was going through before I started being
involved in all of this," she tells me. "And then I get involved in all
of this and people are
like, Hey, let's help somebody with foreclosures. And I'm like,
Yeah, help me!"

***

The legal strategy Brown is looking to exploit are not of much
interest to some others at Occupy Oakland. Organizers like Krystof are skeptical of foreclosure defense as a scalable and
wise tactic for the future of the movement. "It's great
because it's in line with the tactic of occupation," says
Krystof. "The problem is you're intervening in a really personal and
individualistic
struggle." Squat development, meanwhile, is "kind of like dumpster
diving, you know? Living off the scraps of capitalism."

He sees the strength of the future movement lying in a middle
ground between blockading capitalism on the wide roads of the Port and
occupying quietly,
even secretly, in the narrow wood-framed homes of West Oakland.

"We need to intervene in a readable way in localized workplace
struggles," Krystof tells me. "A campaign that will have locally
tangible results
for people" in the form of improved working conditions and
additional hires -- ideally.

"It's kind of like a home defense, but you're not intervening on
behalf of an individual -- you're intervening on behalf of a core of
people
there," he says. "I think that will re-radicalize the labor
movement."

The labor movement has not, especially as of late, seemed
terribly interested in Occupy's radical overtures. Many of the rank and
file may be "nodding
back" as Krystof says, but union leadership is decidedly not.

Occupy Oakland says they shut down the Port in solidarity with
struggling ILWU longshoremen in Longview, Washington in their ongoing
fight against
predatory grain shipper EGT, as well as the non-unionized
truckers at the Port, many of whom lost wages due to the shutdown on
December 12.

"But it was also on our own behalf, because we're saying fuck
you [to the state]: you coordinated attacks on us, we're going to
respond."

"We were shooting for spectacular because we basically wanted to
say that the movement's still relevant," says Krystof. For all the
logistics involved
in shutting down the three Port shifts -- keeping the picket
lines strong by dispensing information and material support over those
24 hours -- those
people powered efforts had one high-minded purpose.

"All occupy actions need to be symbols," Krystof insists. An
action "has to be visible, and it has to have a political message as
well. The
camp's no good unless it's in people's faces and unless the
state can't tolerate it."

***

Teaching people how to fight foreclosures may be symbolic, but it's not legible to the public. It is not a grand symbol of what can be accomplished with people power. Instead, the process is a struggle, a paperwork battle to find, as Iris defines them, "loopholes."

Back in her kitchen, Iris flips to the page she was looking for. "Here we go.[She
owes] $930,000 for a $281,000 house. She's 79 years old, she's on
social
security. How do they rationalize that? Well, it's Wachovia." Brown successfully helped the homeowner's daughter with a five-year lease
for the
property, which the bank should honor to stave off the scheduled
March sale of the house.

These binders are the fruits of the FRAC labor. They contain
massive amounts of data on foreclosed and soon-to-be foreclosed homes
across Oakland,
meticulously compiled from public and private sources. "We are a
centralized resource for information on foreclosures," says Iris.
"And I know
that I'm not at risk because I'm providing information and
that's still in this country perfectly legal."

FRAC's efforts have helped not only individuals looking for
buildings to occupy, but also local non-profits seeking individuals in
pre-foreclosure
needing assistance.

"The system we're trying to build is all about making it
scalable," Iris tells me, and it's all born out of her reading at
the community law
center and trial and error at the courthouse. That system is
being tested in two occupied houses at 10th and Mandela in West
Oakland. Occupiers
quietly establish tenancy by setting up utility bills and making
repairs to the properties. "But then not so quietly, whenever we
actually move
in, we march to the house and feed the neighborhood," says
Iris.

Interestingly, Brown is working with Occupy Oakland's infamous Tactical Action
Committee (TAC), a ubiquitous and passionate group of
direct-action-minded young men who
dress in camouflage army jackets and are living in one of the occupied houses at 10th and Mandela. In fact, they are the same group behind the
botched encampment at 18th and Linden.

These occupations have not been without incident. Iris spends
much of her time mediating disagreements between TAC members. There's
been fighting, and
stealing. Recently someone brought a dog to one of the 10th and
Mandela houses, the "Appletree House," resulting in a feces-smeared mess
that no one
wants to clean up. Sometimes it has been to the group's
advantage that their actions have not been in the limelight.

But that's not the plan for the future. "We don't want just
squats -- we want libraries and we want schools and we want breakfast
programs. We
want social services," Iris tells me. She wants to enlist the
TAC to help individuals in the neighborhood who need extra care -- bring
in newspapers,
take out garbage. She wants to earn political capital instead of
taking it by force.

"We want to make the public fall in love with us."

The public was once in love with Occupy Oakland; after October 25, the whole world was indeed watching. While Occupy Wall Street took place on the movie-ready stage of Manhattan, Occupy Oakland took on an economically depressed city with a long history of police brutality, civil unrest and radical political struggle. This history is unique to Oakland, but these conditions are similar to many other post-recession American cities. Many people looked to Oakland and saw a reality they recognized.

Without the love of the people, without the popularity and the masses, it's just a bunch of activists talking to each other.

But that doesn't mean ruling out shows of power by the movement. Rather, occupiers have to find ways to bring the the adventurists and the coalition builders together to create
institutional support for the movement. "We have two hands, right?" Ritz-Barr asks. "You can't have one or the other -- you need both."

***

Since the nationwide crackdown on occupation encampments over the past month, there's been talk that the Occupy movement is headed underground. In
Oakland, even if occupiers cannot agree on how best to act, it seems the movement is actually reaching out and opening up to the broader
community.

But the loss of the camps still puts these actions and that public relations effort at risk. In some ways, the movement is a little too
decentralized for its own good. Without an open public physical space, there is no way for new people to plug in. Squatted buildings present a possible
solution, a new kind of commons, but they're slow and difficult to form and to hold. They may be better as conceptual tools than organizational nodes. "It's a problem, and one we really need to solve," Krystof says,
shaking his head a little.

The four weekly general assemblies are now small and often dysfunctional. Security concerns and internal splits have sent other group meetings into
private spaces, where they're inaccessible for those not in the know. "We don't have meetings. We just do things," Brown snaps. "We act, we don't
meet."

Add up all those spin-offs and those groups combined greatly outnumber the general assembly, in which they mostly don't participate. Occupy Oakland's future depends on its ability to maintain this multi-front war while making broader efforts to truly include the people it claims to
fight for.

"If you want to bring down the system, you don't want it to crash down on top of everyone," says occupier Laura Long. "We can't just be a movement, we have
to be a whole life."

About the Author

Susie Cagle is a reporter and illustrator based in Oakland, California, and a former John S. Knight journalism fellow at Stanford University. Her work has appeared in The Guardian, The New York Times, and Pacific Standard.

Most Popular

On August 21, the “moon” will pass between the Earth and the sun, obscuring the light of the latter. The government agency NASA says this will result in “one of nature’s most awe-inspiring sights.” The astronomers there claim to have calculated down to the minute exactly when and where this will happen, and for how long. They have reportedly known about this eclipse for years, just by virtue of some sort of complex math.

This seems extremely unlikely. I can’t even find these eclipse calculations on their website to check them for myself.

Meanwhile the scientists tell us we can’t look at it without special glasses because “looking directly at the sun is unsafe.”

The legend of the Confederate leader’s heroism and decency is based in the fiction of a person who never existed.

The strangest part about the continued personality cult of Robert E. Lee is how few of the qualities his admirers profess to see in him he actually possessed.

Memorial Day has the tendency to conjure up old arguments about the Civil War. That’s understandable; it was created to mourn the dead of a war in which the Union was nearly destroyed, when half the country rose up in rebellion in defense of slavery. This year, the removal of Lee’s statue in New Orleans has inspired a new round of commentary about Lee, not to mention protests on his behalf by white supremacists.

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

Just seven months into his presidency, Trump appears to have achieved a status usually reserved for the final months of a term.

In many ways, the Trump presidency never got off the ground: The president’s legislative agenda is going nowhere, his relations with foreign leaders are frayed, and his approval rating with the American people never enjoyed the honeymoon period most newly elected presidents do. Pundits who are sympathetic toward, or even neutral on, the president keep hoping that the next personnel move—the appointment of White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, say, or the long-rumored-but-never-delivered departure of Steve Bannon—will finally get the White House in gear.

But what if they, and many other people, are thinking about it wrong? Maybe the reality is not that the Trump presidency has never gotten started. It’s that he’s already reached his lame-duck period. For most presidents, that comes in the last few months of a term. For Trump, it appears to have arrived early, just a few months into his term. The president did always brag that he was a fast learner.

An analysis of Stormfront forums shows a sometimes sophisticated understanding of the limits of ancestry tests.

The white-nationalist forum Stormfront hosts discussions on a wide range of topics, from politics to guns to The Lord of the Rings. And of particular and enduring interest: genetic ancestry tests. For white nationalists, DNA tests are a way to prove their racial purity. Of course, their results don’t always come back that way. And how white nationalists try to explain away non-European ancestry is rather illuminating of their beliefs.

Two years ago—before Donald Trump was elected president, before white nationalism had become central to the political conversation—Aaron Panofsky and Joan Donovan, sociologists then at the University of California, Los Angeles, set out to study Stormfront forum posts about genetic ancestry tests. They presented their study at the American Sociological Association meeting this Monday. (A preprint of the paper is now online.) After the events in Charlottesville this week, their research struck a particular chord with the audience.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

Antifa’s activists say they’re battling burgeoning authoritarianism on the American right. Are they fueling it instead?

Since 1907, Portland, Oregon, has hosted an annual Rose Festival. Since 2007, the festival had included a parade down 82nd Avenue. Since 2013, the Republican Party of Multnomah County, which includes Portland, had taken part. This April, all of that changed.

In the days leading up to the planned parade, a group called the Direct Action Alliance declared, “Fascists plan to march through the streets,” and warned, “Nazis will not march through Portland unopposed.” The alliance said it didn’t object to the Multnomah GOP itself, but to “fascists” who planned to infiltrate its ranks. Yet it also denounced marchers with “Trump flags” and “red maga hats” who could “normalize support for an orange man who bragged about sexually harassing women and who is waging a war of hate, racism and prejudice.” A second group, Oregon Students Empowered, created a Facebook page called “Shut down fascism! No nazis in Portland!”

Anti-Semitic logic fueled the violence over the weekend, no matter what the president says.

The “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville was ostensibly about protecting a statue of Robert E. Lee. It was about asserting the legitimacy of “white culture” and white supremacy, and defending the legacy of the Confederacy.

So why did the demonstrators chant anti-Semitic lines like “Jews will not replace us”?

The demonstration was suffused with anti-black racism, but also with anti-Semitism. Marchers displayed swastikas on banners and shouted slogans like “blood and soil,” a phrase drawn from Nazi ideology. “This city is run by Jewish communists and criminal niggers,” one demonstrator told Vice News’ Elspeth Reeve during their march. As Jews prayed at a local synagogue, Congregation Beth Israel, men dressed in fatigues carrying semi-automatic rifles stood across the street, according to the temple’s president. Nazi websites posted a call to burn their building. As a precautionary measure, congregants had removed their Torah scrolls and exited through the back of the building when they were done praying.

If the president is concerned about violence on the left, he can start by fighting the white supremacist movements whose growth has fueled its rise.

In his Tuesday press conference, Donald Trump talked at length about what he called “the alt left.” White supremacists, he claimed, weren’t the only people in Charlottesville last weekend that deserved condemnation. “You had a group on the other side that was also very violent,” he declared. “Nobody wants to say that.”

I can say with great confidence that Trump’s final sentence is untrue. I can do so because the September issue of TheAtlantic contains an essay of mine entitled “The Rise of the Violent Left,” which discusses the very phenomenon that Trump claims “nobody wants” to discuss. Trump is right that, in Charlottesville and beyond, the violence of some leftist activists constitutes a real problem. Where he’s wrong is in suggesting that it’s a problem in any way comparable to white supremacism.

The nation’s current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history.

When did America become untethered from reality?

I first noticed our national lurch toward fantasy in 2004, after President George W. Bush’s political mastermind, Karl Rove, came up with the remarkable phrase reality-based community. People in “the reality-based community,” he told a reporter, “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality … That’s not the way the world really works anymore.” A year later, The Colbert Report went on the air. In the first few minutes of the first episode, Stephen Colbert, playing his right-wing-populist commentator character, performed a feature called “The Word.” His first selection: truthiness. “Now, I’m sure some of the ‘word police,’ the ‘wordinistas’ over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word!’ Well, anybody who knows me knows that I’m no fan of dictionaries or reference books.