xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

Commission File Number: 0-26068

________________________________________

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

________________________________________

DELAWARE

95-4405754

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

520 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660

(Address of principal executive offices; Zip Code)

(949) 480-8300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of May 4, 2015, 51,049,566 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, were issued and outstanding.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

Net loss including noncontrolling interests in operating subsidiaries

$

(13,552

)

$

(24,570

)

Other comprehensive loss:

Unrealized loss on short-term investments, net of tax of $0

(143

)

(476

)

Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation, net of tax of $0

(28

)

—

Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net loss

84

447

Total other comprehensive loss

(13,639

)

(24,599

)

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

422

149

Comprehensive loss attributable to Acacia Research Corporation

$

(13,217

)

$

(24,450

)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss including noncontrolling interests in operating subsidiaries

$

(13,552

)

$

(24,570

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss including noncontrolling interests in operating subsidiaries to net cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

13,101

14,552

Non-cash stock compensation

3,247

4,765

Other

(12

)

—

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Restricted cash

(10,718

)

—

Accounts receivable

(9,839

)

(7,199

)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

(702

)

(62

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

(2,133

)

740

Royalties and contingent legal fees payable

4,778

(6,552

)

Deferred taxes, net

—

(2,106

)

Net cash used in operating activities

(15,830

)

(20,432

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment

—

(96

)

Purchases of available-for-sale investments

(13,369

)

(14,234

)

Maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments

18,579

48,632

Investments in patents/ patent rights

(16,861

)

(987

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(11,651

)

33,315

Cash flows from financing activities:

Dividends paid to stockholders

(6,375

)

(6,255

)

Proceeds from exercises of stock options

938

90

Net cash used in financing activities

(5,437

)

(6,165

)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(32,918

)

6,718

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning

134,466

126,685

Cash and cash equivalents, ending

$

101,548

$

133,403

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities:

Patent acquisition costs included in accrued patent acquisition costs

$

900

$

15,250

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Description of Business. As used herein, “Acacia” and the “Company” refer to Acacia Research Corporation and/or its wholly and majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries, and/or where applicable, its management. All patent investment, prosecution, licensing and enforcement activities are conducted solely by certain of Acacia’s wholly and majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries.

Acacia’s operating subsidiaries invest in, license and enforce patented technologies. Acacia’s operating subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, applying their legal and technology expertise to patent assets to unlock the financial value in their patented inventions. Acacia is an intermediary in the patent marketplace, bridging the gap between invention and application, facilitating efficiency and delivering monetary rewards to patent owners.

Acacia’s operating subsidiaries generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of intellectual property rights for the use of patented technologies that its operating subsidiaries control or own. Acacia’s operating subsidiaries assist patent owners with the prosecution and development of their patent portfolios, the protection of their patented inventions from unauthorized use, the generation of licensing revenue from users of their patented technologies and, where necessary, with the enforcement against unauthorized users of their patented technologies through the filing of patent infringement litigation.

Acacia’s operating subsidiaries are principals in the licensing and enforcement effort, obtaining control of the rights in the patent portfolio, or control of the patent portfolio outright. Acacia’s operating subsidiaries own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, which include U.S. patents and certain foreign counterparts, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Acacia and its wholly and majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Noncontrolling interests in Acacia’s majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries (“noncontrolling interests”) are separately presented as a component of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated statements of financial position for the applicable periods presented. Consolidated net loss is adjusted to include the net loss attributed to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of operations. Refer to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for total noncontrolling interests, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and contributions from and distributions to noncontrolling interests, for the applicable periods presented.

A wholly owned subsidiary of Acacia is the general partner of the Acacia Intellectual Property Fund, L.P. (the “Acacia IP Fund”), which was formed in August 2010. The Acacia IP Fund is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the periods presented because Acacia’s wholly owned subsidiary, which is the majority owner and general partner, has the ability to control the operations and activities of the Acacia IP Fund.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in annual financial statements have been omitted or condensed in accordance with quarterly reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2014, as reported by Acacia in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The year end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Acacia include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of Acacia’s consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2015, and results of its operations and its cash flows for the interim periods presented. The consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.

5

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) all obligations have been substantially performed pursuant to the terms of the arrangement, (iii) amounts are fixed or determinable, and (iv) the collectibility of amounts is reasonably assured.

In general, revenue arrangements provide for the payment of contractually determined fees in consideration for the grant of certain intellectual property rights for patented technologies owned or controlled by Acacia’s operating subsidiaries. These rights typically include some combination of the following: (i) the grant of a non-exclusive, retroactive and future license to manufacture and/or sell products covered by patented technologies owned or controlled by Acacia’s operating subsidiaries, (ii) a covenant-not-to-sue, (iii) the release of the licensee from certain claims, and (iv) the dismissal of any pending litigation. The intellectual property rights granted may be perpetual in nature, extending until the expiration of the related patents, or can be granted for a defined, relatively short period of time, with the licensee possessing the right to renew the agreement at the end of each contractual term for an additional minimum upfront payment. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, Acacia’s operating subsidiaries have no further obligation with respect to the grant of the non-exclusive retroactive and future licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other deliverables, including no express or implied obligation on Acacia’s operating subsidiaries’ part to maintain or upgrade the technology, or provide future support or services. Generally, the agreements provide for the grant of the licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other significant deliverables upon execution of the agreement, or upon receipt of the minimum upfront payment for term agreement renewals. As such, the earnings process is complete and revenue is recognized upon the execution of the agreement, when collectibility is reasonably assured, or upon receipt of the minimum upfront fee for term agreement renewals, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues include the costs and expenses incurred in connection with Acacia’s patent licensing and enforcement activities, including inventor royalties paid to original patent owners, contingent legal fees paid to external patent counsel, other patent-related legal expenses paid to external patent counsel, licensing and enforcement related research, consulting and other expenses paid to third-parties and the amortization of patent-related investment costs. These costs are included under the caption “Cost of revenues” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Inventor Royalties and Contingent Legal Expenses. Inventor royalties are expensed in the consolidated statements of operations in the period that the related revenues are recognized. In certain instances, pursuant to the terms of the underlying inventor agreements, upfront advances paid to patent owners by Acacia’s operating subsidiaries are recoverable from future net revenues. Patent costs that are recoverable from future net revenues are amortized over the estimated economic useful life of the related patents, or as the prepaid royalties are earned by the inventor, as appropriate, and the related expense is included in amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Any unamortized upfront advances recovered from net revenues are expensed in the period recovered, and included in amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Contingent legal fees are expensed in the consolidated statements of operations in the period that the related revenues are recognized. In instances where there are no recoveries from potential infringers, no contingent legal fees are paid; however, Acacia’s operating subsidiaries may be liable for certain out of pocket legal costs incurred pursuant to the underlying legal services agreement.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Acacia believes that, of the significant accounting policies described herein, the accounting policies associated with revenue recognition, stock-based compensation expense, impairment of marketable securities and intangible assets, the determination of the economic useful life of amortizable intangible assets, income taxes and valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets and the application of the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, require its most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Concentrations. Two licensees individually accounted for 58% and 15% of revenues recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015, and one licensee accounted for 39% of revenues recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Two licensees individually represented approximately 66% and 17% of accounts receivable at March 31, 2015. Three licensees individually represented approximately 30%, 17% and 15% of accounts receivable at December 31, 2014. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, 62% and 16%, respectively, of revenues were attributable to

6

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

licensees domiciled in foreign jurisdictions, based on the jurisdiction of the entity obligated to satisfy payment obligations pursuant to the applicable revenue arrangement. The Company does not have any material foreign operations.

Stock-Based Compensation. The compensation cost for stock-based awards is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense, on a straight-line basis, over the employee’s requisite service period (the vesting period of the equity award) which is two to four years. The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards is determined by the product of the number of shares or units granted and the grant date market price of the underlying common stock. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded only for those awards expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate.

Fair Value Measurements. U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date, and also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The three-level hierarchy of valuation techniques established to measure fair value is defined as follows:

Investments in Marketable Securities. Investments in securities with original maturities of greater than three months and less than one year and other investments representing amounts that are available for current operations are classified as short-term investments, unless there are indications that such investments may not be readily sold in the short term. The fair values of these investments approximate their carrying values. For the periods presented, all of Acacia’s short term investments were classified as available-for-sale, which are reported at fair value on a recurring basis using observable inputs (Level 1), with related unrealized gains and losses in the value of such securities recorded as a separate component of comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity until realized. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded based on the specific identification method. Interest on all securities is included in interest income.

Short-term marketable securities for the periods presented were comprised of the following (in thousands):

March 31, 2015

Security Type

Cost

Gross Unrealized Gains

Gross Unrealized Losses

Fair Value

U.S. government fixed income securities

$

53,609

$

3

$

(323

)

$

53,289

Total short-term investments

$

53,609

$

3

$

(323

)

$

53,289

December 31, 2014

Security Type

Cost

Gross Unrealized Gains

Gross Unrealized Losses

Fair Value

U.S. government fixed income securities

$

58,819

$

2

$

(263

)

$

58,558

Total short-term investments

$

58,819

$

2

$

(263

)

$

58,558

The gross unrealized loss can be primarily attributed to a combination of market conditions as well as the demand for and duration of the U.S. government fixed income securities. The Company has the ability to hold these securities until maturity, currently has no intent to sell, there is no requirement to sell and the Company believes that it can recover the amortized cost of these investments. The Company has found no evidence of impairment due to credit losses in its portfolio. Therefore, these unrealized losses were recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). However, the Company cannot provide any assurance that its portfolio of short-term marketable securities will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial

7

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

markets, which may require the Company in the future to record an impairment charge for credit losses which could adversely impact its financial results.

Patents. Patents include the cost of patents or patent rights (hereinafter, collectively “patents”) obtained from third-parties or obtained in connection with business combinations. Capitalized patent costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their remaining economic useful lives, ranging from one to nine years. Certain patent application and prosecution costs incurred to secure additional patent claims, that based on management’s estimates are deemed to be recoverable, are capitalized and amortized over the remaining estimated economic useful life of the related patent portfolio.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets. Acacia reviews long-lived assets and intangible assets for potential impairment annually (quarterly for patents) and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In the event the expected undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows.

Fair value is generally estimated using the “Income Approach,” focusing on the estimated future net income-producing capability of the patent portfolios over the estimated remaining economic useful life. Estimates of future after-tax cash flows are converted to present value through “discounting,” including an estimated rate of return that accounts for both the time value of money and investment risk factors. Estimated cash inflows are typically based on estimates of reasonable royalty rates for the applicable technology, applied to estimated market share data. Estimated cash outflows are based on existing contractual obligations, such as contingent legal fee and inventor royalty obligations, applied to estimated license fee revenues, in addition to other estimates of out-of-pocket expenses associated with a specific patent portfolio’s licensing and enforcement program. The analysis also contemplates consideration of current information about the patent portfolio including, status and stage of litigation, periodic results of the litigation process, strength of the patent portfolio, technology coverage and other pertinent information that could impact future net cash flows.

Income Taxes. Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in Acacia’s consolidated financial statements or consolidated income tax returns. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if all, or some portion, of such assets will more than likely not be realized, or if it is determined that there is uncertainty regarding future realizability of such assets.

The provision for (benefit from) income taxes for interim periods is determined using an estimate of Acacia’s annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the relevant period. Each quarter, Acacia updates the estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated tax rate changes, a cumulative adjustment is recorded.

The Company's effective tax rates were 1% and (5)% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 reflects the impact of state taxes and full valuation allowances recorded for net operating loss carryforward related tax assets generated during the period. The tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily reflects the benefit, totaling $1,735,000, from the reversal of the net deferred tax liability that existed at the beginning of 2014, other state taxes and full valuation allowances recorded for net operating loss carryforward related tax assets generated during the period. Valuation allowances were recorded for the periods presented due to uncertainty regarding future realizability of tax assets pursuant to guidance set forth in ASC 740, "Income Taxes." In future periods, if the Company determines it will more likely than not be able to realize certain of these amounts, the applicable portion of the benefit from the release of the valuation allowance will generally be recognized in the statement of operations in the period the determination is recorded.

3. INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company computes net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders using the two-class method required for capital structures that include participating securities. Under the two-class method, securities that participate in non-forfeitable dividends, such as the Company’s outstanding unvested restricted stock, are considered “participating securities.”

In applying the two-class method, (i) basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) (less any dividends paid on participating securities) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and participating

8

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

securities outstanding for the period and (ii) diluted earnings per share may include the additional effect of other securities, if dilutive, in which case the dilutive effect of such securities is calculated by applying the two-class method and the treasury stock method to the assumed exercise or vesting of potentially dilutive common shares. The method yielding the more dilutive result is ultimately reported for the applicable period. Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents primarily consist of employee stock options, and restricted stock units for calculations utilizing the two-class method, and also include unvested restricted stock, when utilizing the treasury method.

The following table presents the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

Numerator (in thousands):

Basic

Net loss

$

(13,130

)

$

(24,421

)

Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

—

—

Total dividends declared / paid

(6,375

)

(6,255

)

Dividends attributable to common stockholders

6,160

6,048

Net loss attributable to common stockholders – basic

$

(13,345

)

$

(24,628

)

Diluted

Net loss

$

(13,130

)

$

(24,421

)

Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

—

—

Total dividends declared / paid

(6,375

)

(6,255

)

Dividends attributable to common stockholders

6,160

6,048

Net loss attributable to common stockholders – diluted

$

(13,345

)

$

(24,628

)

Denominator:

Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders – basic

49,212,207

48,329,375

Effect of potentially dilutive securities:

Common stock options and restricted stock units

—

—

Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders – diluted

49,212,207

48,329,375

Basic net loss per common share

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.51

)

Diluted net loss per common share

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.51

)

Anti-dilutive equity-based incentive awards excluded from the computation of diluted income (loss) per share were immaterial for the applicable periods presented.

4. PATENTS

Acacia’s only identifiable intangible assets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are patents and patent rights. Patent-related accumulated amortization totaled $179,603,000 and $166,565,000 as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Acacia’s patents have remaining estimated economic useful lives ranging from one to nine years. The weighted-average remaining estimated economic useful life of Acacia’s patents is approximately six years. The following table presents the scheduled annual aggregate amortization expense as of March 31, 2015 (in thousands):

9

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Remainder of 2015

$

39,191

2016

49,584

2017

48,496

2018

44,368

2019

38,738

Thereafter

54,282

Total

$

274,659

For the threemonths ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Acacia paid patent related investment costs totaling $16,861,000 (including up-front patent portfolio advances and previously accrued milestone payments related to patent related investments made in prior periods) and $987,000, respectively. The underlying patents have estimated economic useful lives of approximately four to ten years. Included in net additions to capitalized patent costs during the months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 are accrued patent investment costs totaling $900,000 and $15,250,000, respectively, which are amortized over the estimated economic useful life of the related patents.

Included in amortization of patents for the months ended March 31, 2014 was accelerated amortization related to the partial write-down of a patent portfolio, due to a reduction in expected estimated future net cash flows, totaling $2,565,000.

5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Bank Guarantee

In March 2015, an operating subsidiary of Acacia entered into a standby letter of credit and guarantee arrangement (“Guarantee”) with a bank in the amount of $10.7 million, for purposes of enforcing a court ruling in a German patent court granting an injunction against the defendants in the related patent infringement case. An injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a court order that compels the defendant(s) to cease marketing, offering for sale or importing applicable infringing products into applicable jurisdiction(s).

Under German law, in order to enforce the injunction granted by the court, a Guarantee is required to be furnished by our operating subsidiary, the plaintiff in the case, for potential payment to the defendants of any applicable claims which may be incurred by the defendants as a result of the enforcement of the injunction, only in the event that the aforementioned court ruling is subsequently successfully appealed by the defendants or otherwise amended. The Guarantee is required to be issued unlimited with respect to time, until appropriately extinguished in accordance with German law. The Guarantee will be extinguished when a relevant extinguishment order by the court having jurisdiction takes effect, typically occurring when the related infringement case has been settled or a final non-appealable decision has been issued by the court.

The Guarantee is secured by a cash deposit at the contracting bank totaling $10.7 million, which is classified as restricted cash in the March 31, 2015 balance sheet. The Guarantee expires on April 10, 2016, however, it is automatically extended without amendment for a period of one (1) year from the present or any future expiration date, unless at least 30 days prior to any expiration date, the Guarantee is extinguished in accordance with German law. The Guarantee facility fee is 1.15% per year, and the related expense is included in the statement of operations.

Patent Enforcement

Certain of Acacia’s operating subsidiaries are often required to engage in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights. In connection with any of Acacia’s operating subsidiaries’ patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against Acacia or its operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, a federal court decided that a lawsuit initiated in 2013 was exceptional. The respective operating subsidiaries have taken steps to challenge the amounts requested including the filing of a notice of appeal. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included an expense accrual for this matter totaling $426,000.

10

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Other

In February 2011, Michael Strathmann ("Plaintiff") served a Complaint for Violation of the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act (California Insurance Code Section 1871.7) against Acacia, CombiMatrix Corporation, and Dr. Amit Kumar in the Superior Court of the State of California (the "Court") in connection with a prior lawsuit against Nanogen, Inc., that was settled in 2002. Plaintiff alleged that the defendants wrongfully made a claim for insurance coverage for the Nanogen lawsuit leading to a settlement with the insurer. The trial commenced in June 2014. In March 2015, the court issued a final judgment in Acacia's favor, dismissing the complaint with prejudice and affirming its prior rulings in favor of Acacia and the defendants, and against all claims of the Plaintiff.

Acacia is subject to claims, counterclaims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the ultimate liability with respect to these claims and legal actions, if any, will not have a material effect on Acacia’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

6. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Cash Dividends. On April 23, 2013, Acacia announced that its Board of Directors approved the adoption of a cash dividend policy that calls for the payment of an expected total annual cash dividend of $0.50 per common share, payable in the amount of $0.125 per share per quarter. Under the policy, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends totaling $6,375,000 and $6,255,000 during the threemonths ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Future cash dividends are expected to be paid on a quarterly basis and will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 21, 2015, Acacia announced that its Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend payable in the amount of $0.125 per share. The quarterly cash dividend will be paid on May 29, 2015 to stockholders of record at close of business on May 4, 2015. Future cash dividends are expected to be paid on a quarterly basis and will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

8. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Not Yet Adopted.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued a new accounting standard which requires that a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period shall be treated as a performance condition. Adoption of this standard is required for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standards update addressing revenue from contracts with customers, which clarifies existing accounting literature relating to how and when a company recognizes revenue. Under the standard, a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The amendments for this standard update are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and are to be applied retrospectively or the cumulative effect as of the date of adoption, with early application not permitted. On April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to propose a one-year deferral to the effective date, but to permit entities to adopt one year earlier if they choose (i.e., the original effective date). We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern every reporting period including interim periods, and to provide related footnote disclosure in certain circumstances. Adoption of this standard is required for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and are to be applied retrospectively or the cumulative effect as of the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

11

ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this accounting standard update require debt issuance costs be presented on the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. The amendments in this accounting standard update are to be applied retrospectively and are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

12

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2015.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and concern matters that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Reference is made in particular to the description of our plans and objectives for future operations, assumptions underlying such plans and objectives, and other forward-looking statements set forth under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Such statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of such terms, although not all forward-looking statements contain these terms. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such statements address future events and conditions concerning intellectual property acquisition and development, licensing and enforcement activities, capital expenditures, earnings, litigation, regulatory matters, markets for our services, liquidity and capital resources and accounting matters. Actual results in each case could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements by reason of factors such as our ability to invest in new technologies and patents, future global economic conditions, changes in demand for our services, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments in markets in which we and our subsidiaries operate, results of litigation and other circumstances affecting anticipated revenues and costs. We expressly disclaim any intent, obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein to conform such statements to actual results or to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that affect our business, including without limitation the disclosures made under the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Financial Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and disclosures made under the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

General

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Acacia Research Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and/or its wholly and majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries, and/or where applicable, its management. All intellectual property acquisition, development, licensing and enforcement activities are conducted solely by certain of Acacia Research Corporation’s wholly and majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries.

Our operating subsidiaries invest in, license and enforce patented technologies. Our operating subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, applying our legal and technology expertise to patent assets to unlock the financial value in their patented inventions. We are an intermediary in the patent marketplace, bridging the gap between invention and application, facilitating efficiency and delivering monetary rewards to patent owners.

Our operating subsidiaries generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of patent rights for the use of patented technologies that our operating subsidiaries control or own. Our operating subsidiaries assist patent owners with the prosecution and development of their patent portfolios, the protection of their patented inventions from unauthorized use, the generation of licensing revenue from users of their patented technologies and, where necessary, with the enforcement against unauthorized users of their patented technologies through the filing of patent infringement litigation.

We are a leader in licensing patented technologies and have established a proven track record of licensing success with over 1,450 license agreements executed to date, across 183 of our patent licensing and enforcement programs. Currently, on a consolidated basis, our operating subsidiaries own or control the rights to multiple patent portfolios, which include U.S. patents

13

and certain foreign counterparts, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries. To date, we have generated gross licensing revenue of approximately $1.2 billion, and have returned more than $691 million to our patent partners.

Executive Summary

During the periods presented, we continued our business of empowering patent owners and rewarding invention by providing a path to patent monetization for the people and companies who have contributed valuable patented inventions to an industry, but who require a professional, experienced independent third-party licensing partner to get rewarded for those inventions. These people and companies are our customers, and in many cases, components of the patent disenfranchised. In so doing, we have placed ourselves at the forefront of an emerging secondary market in patent assets under which holders of high quality patents, including the patent disenfranchised, may be rewarded for the use of their patented inventions by others, even if they do not have the capital and expertise to engage in lengthy, costly and risky patent litigation.

Our operating activities for the periods presented were principally focused on the continued investment in and development of our patent licensing and enforcement business, including the continued pursuit of our ongoing patent licensing and enforcement programs and the commencement of new patent licensing and enforcement programs. In addition, we continued our focus on business development, including the investment in existing portfolios during the 2015 period and in new high quality patent portfolios during the 2014 period by certain of our operating subsidiaries, and the continued pursuit of additional opportunities to partner with patent owners or invest in new patent portfolios and continue our industry leading patent licensing and enforcement activities.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, we reported revenues of $34.2 million from 23 new revenue agreements covering 18 different licensing programs, including 2 licensing programs generating initial revenues in the quarter. Cash and investments (including restricted cash) totaled $165.6 million as of March 31, 2015 as compared to $193.0 million as of December 31, 2014.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we made patent related payments and milestone payments to patent owners, with whom we partnered for the licensing of their patented technologies, totaling $16.9 million.

Operating activities during the periods presented included the following:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

Revenues (in thousands)

$

34,210

$

12,578

New agreements executed

23

20

Licensing and enforcement programs generating revenues

18

21

Licensing and enforcement programs with initial revenues

2

3

New patent portfolios

—

3

We measure and assess the performance and growth of the patent licensing and enforcement businesses conducted by our operating subsidiaries based on consolidated revenues recognized across all of our technology licensing and enforcement programs on a trailing twelve-month basis. Trailing twelve-month revenues during the periods presented were as follows (in thousands, except percentage change values):

As of Date:

Trailing Twelve -Month Revenues

% Change

March 31, 2015

$

152,508

17

%

December 31, 2014

$

130,876

14

%

September 30, 2014

$

114,911

23

%

June 30, 2014

$

93,239

41

%

March 31, 2014

$

66,273

-

14

Our revenues historically have fluctuated quarterly, and can vary significantly, based on a number of factors including the following:

•

the dollar amount of agreements executed each period, which can be driven by the nature and characteristics of the technology or technologies being licensed and the magnitude of infringement associated with a specific licensee;

•

the specific terms and conditions of agreements executed each period including the nature and characteristics of rights granted, and the periods of infringement or term of use contemplated by the respective payments;

the relative maturity of licensing programs during the applicable periods;

•

other external factors, including the periodic status or results of ongoing negotiations, the status or results of ongoing litigations and appeals, actual or perceived shifts in the regulatory environment, impact of unrelated patent related judicial proceedings and other macroeconomic factors; and

•

historically, based on the merits and strength of our operating subsidiary’s patent infringement claims and other factors, many prospective licensees have elected to settle significant patent infringement cases and pay reasonable license fees for the use of our patented technology, as those patent infringement cases approached a court determined trial date.

Management does not attempt to manage for smooth sequential periodic growth in revenues period to period, and therefore, periodic results can be uneven. Unlike most operating businesses and industries, licensing revenues not generated in a current period are not necessarily foregone but, most likely, depending on whether negotiations, litigation or both continue into subsequent periods, and depending on a number of other factors, such potential revenues may be pushed into subsequent fiscal periods.

Although revenues from one or more of our patents or patent portfolios may be significant in a specific reporting period, we believe that none of our individual patents or patent portfolios is individually significant to our licensing and enforcement business as a whole.

We have strategically chosen to shift the focus of our operating business to increasingly serve a smaller number of customers each having higher quality patent portfolios. High quality patent portfolios are typically associated with higher numbers of varied defensible claims, higher revenue potential, originating from high-pedigreed patent owners and/or possessing a relatively large number of prospective licensees. In this regard, commencing in the later portion of 2013 and early 2014, we have continued the shift in our focus at our point of patent intake, from quantity to quality.

We continue to identify and explore opportunities for partnering with companies in the technology and other sectors for the licensing and enforcement of their high quality patented technologies, and are also expanding our activity in international markets, both of which we expect will expand and diversify our future revenue generating opportunities.

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included fees from the following technology licensing and enforcement programs:

•

3G & 4G Cellular Air Interface and Infrastructure technology

•

Location Based Services technology

•

Audio Communications Fraud Detection technology

•

Oil and Gas Production technology

•

Automotive Safety, Navigation and Diagnostics technology

•

Online Auction Guarantee technology

•

Broadband Communications technology

•

Reflective and Radiant Barrier Insulation technology

•

DisplayPort and MIPI DSI technology(1)

•

Semiconductor Testing technology(1)

•

Gas Modulation Control Systems technology

•

Speech codes used in wireless and wireline systems technology

•

Innovative Display technology

•

Super Resolutions Microscopy technology

•

Intercarrier SMS technology

•

Suture Anchors technology

•

Interstitial and Pop-Up Internet Advertising technology

•

Telematics technology

_________________________________________

(1)

Initial revenues recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015

15

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2014 included fees from the following technology licensing and enforcement programs:

•

3G & 4G Wireless Patents

•

Messaging technology

•

4G Wireless technology

•

Online Gaming technology

•

Audio Communications Fraud Detection technology

•

Reflective and Radiant Barrier Insulation technology

•

Broadband Communications technology

•

Semiconductor Packaging technology

•

Computer-Aided Design technology(1)

•

Software Activation technology

•

Core Fiber Optic Network Architectures technology

•

Super Resolutions Microscopy technology(1)

•

DMT technology

•

Suture Anchors technology

•

Electronic Access Control technology(1)

•

Telematics technology

•

Gas Modulation Control Systems technology

•

Video Analytics for Security technology

•

Improved Lighting technology

•

Wireless Monitoring technology

•

Interstitial and Pop-Up Internet Advertising technology

__________________________________________

(1)

Initial revenues recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014

Summary of Results of Operations - Overview

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

(In thousands, except percentage change values)

Three Months Ended March 31,

%

2015

2014

Change

Revenues

$

34,210

$

12,578

172

%

Operating costs and expenses

47,820

38,629

24

%

Operating loss

(13,610

)

(26,051

)

(48

)%

Loss before (provision for) benefit from income taxes

(13,382

)

(25,942

)

(48

)%

(Provision for) benefit from income taxes

(170

)

1,372

(112

)%

Net loss attributable to Acacia Research Corporation

(13,130

)

(24,421

)

(46

)%

Overview - Three months ended March 31, 2015 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2014

•

Revenues increased $21.6 million, or 172%, to $34.2 million, as compared to $12.6 million in the comparable prior year quarter, due primarily to an increase in the average revenue per agreement.

•

Loss before income taxes decreased 48%, to $13.4 million, as compared to $25.9 millionin the comparable prior year quarter, due primarily to a 172% increase in revenues, a 10% decrease in marketing, general and administrative expenses, and a 10% decrease in patent amortization expense.

•

Cost of Revenues and Other Operating Expenses:

•

Inventor royalties and contingent legal fees, on a combined basis, increased $11.6 million, or 469%, compared to the 172% increase in related revenues for the same periods, due primarily to higher average inventor royalty rates, primarily due to lower average cost recoveries resulting in increased inventor royalties, for the specific portfolios generating revenues during the first quarter of 2015.

•

Litigation and licensing expenses-patents decreased $319,000, or 4%, to $8.7 million, due primarily to a minor net decrease in patent prosecution, litigation support and third-party technical consulting expenses associated with ongoing and new licensing and enforcement programs commenced since the end of the comparable prior year quarter.

16

•

Amortization of patents decreased $1.4 million, or 10%, to $13.0 million, due primarily to a decrease in patent impairment charges totaling $2.6 million, which was partially offset by an increase in quarterly amortization expense for patent portfolio investments made since the end of the prior year period totaling $1.1 million.

•

The effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were 1% and (5)%, respectively. The effective rate for the first quarter of 2015 reflects the impact of valuation allowances recorded for current period net operating loss carryforward related tax assets generated during the period. The effective rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 reflects the impact of valuation allowances recorded for the majority of net operating loss related and other tax assets generated during the period.

Investments in Patent Portfolios

We also measure and assess the performance and growth of the patent licensing and enforcement businesses conducted by our operating subsidiaries based on patent portfolio partnering / intake opportunities closed by our operating subsidiaries on a consolidated basis during the applicable reporting periods.

Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for information regarding the impact on the consolidated financial statements of upfront advances and milestone payments made in connection with patent partnering and investment activities during the periods presented.

Future patent portfolio intake arrangements will continue to expand and diversify our future revenue generating opportunities. Our operating subsidiaries are principals in the licensing and enforcement effort, obtaining control of the rights in the patent portfolio, or control of the patent portfolio outright.

Patent Licensing and Enforcement

We expect patent-related legal expenses to continue to fluctuate from period to period based on the factors summarized herein, in connection with future trial dates, international enforcement, strategic patent portfolio prosecution and our current and future patent portfolio investment, prosecution, licensing and enforcement activities. The pursuit of enforcement actions in connection with our licensing and enforcement programs can involve certain risks and uncertainties, including the following:

Our patented technologies and enforcement actions are complex and, as a result, we may be required to appeal adverse decisions by trial courts in order to successfully enforce our patents;

•

New legislation, regulations or rules related to enforcement actions, including any fee or cost shifting provisions, could significantly increase our operating costs and decrease our profit generating opportunities. Increased focus on the growing number of patent-related lawsuits may result in legislative changes which increase our costs and related risks of asserting patent enforcement actions. For instance, the United States House of Representatives passed a bill that would require non-practicing entities that bring patent infringement lawsuits to pay legal costs of the defendants, if the lawsuits are unsuccessful and certain standards are not met;

•

Courts may rule that our subsidiaries have violated certain statutory, regulatory, federal, local or governing rules or standards by pursuing such enforcement actions, which may expose us and our operating subsidiaries to material liabilities, which could harm our operating results and our financial position; and

•

The complexity of negotiations and potential magnitude of exposure for potential infringers associated with higher quality patent portfolios may lead to increased intervals of time between the filing of litigation and potential revenue events (i.e. markman dates, trial dates), which may lead to increased legal expenses, consistent with the higher revenue potential of such portfolios.

17

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparation of these consolidated statements requires management to make judgments and estimates. Some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements. A summary of significant accounting policies and a description of accounting policies that are considered critical may be found in the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three Months EndedMarch 31, 2015 and 2014

Revenues and Pretax Net Loss

Three Months Ended March 31,

Change

2015

2014

$

%

Revenues (in thousands, except percentage change values)

$

34,210

$

12,578

$

21,632

172

%

New agreements executed

23

20

Average revenue per agreement (in thousands)

$

1,487

$

629

A reconciliation of the change in revenues (based on average revenue per agreement) for the periods presented, using the prior year period as the base period, is as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015 vs. 2014

(in thousands)

Change in number of agreements executed

$

1,887

Increase in average revenue per agreement executed

19,745

Total change in revenues

$

21,632

Two licensees individually accounted for 58% and 15% of revenues recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015, and one licensee individually accounted for 39% of revenues recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Three Months Ended March 31,

Change

2015

2014

$

%

(in thousands, except percentage change values)

Loss before (provision for) benefit from income taxes

$

(13,382

)

$

(25,942

)

$

12,560

(48

)%

18

A reconciliation of the change in pretax loss for the periods presented is as follows:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015 vs. 2014

%

(in thousands, except percentage values)

Increase in revenues

$

21,632

172

%

Increase in inventor royalties and contingent legal fees combined

(11,631

)

(93

)%

Decrease in marketing, general and administrative expenses

1,118

9

%

Decrease in litigation and licensing expenses

319

3

%

Decrease in patent amortization expenses

1,434

11

%

Other

(312

)

(2

)%

Total decrease in loss before (provision for) benefit from income taxes

$

12,560

100

%

Cost of Revenues

Three Months Ended March 31,

Change

2015

2014

$

%

(in thousands, except percentage change values)

Inventor royalties

$

9,325

$

951

$

8,374

881

%

Contingent legal fees

4,784

1,527

3,257

213

%

Inventor Royalties and Contingent Legal Fees Expense. Inventor royalties and contingent legal fee expenses fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios with varying economic terms and obligations generating revenues each period. A summary of the main drivers of the change in inventor royalties expense and contingent legal fees expense for the comparable periods presented, using the prior year period as the base period, is as follows (in thousands, except percentage values):

Three Months Ended March 31,

%

2015 vs. 2014

Inventor Royalties:

Increase in total revenues

$

3,227

39

%

Increase in inventor royalty rates

4,257

51

%

Decrease in revenues without inventor royalty obligations

890

10

%

Total change in inventor royalties expense

$

8,374

100

%

Contingent Legal Fees:

Increase in total revenues

$

2,640

81

%

Increase in contingent legal fee rates

851

26

%

Increase in revenues without contingent legal fee obligations

(234

)

(7

)%

Total change in contingent legal fees expense

$

3,257

100

%

The increase in average inventor royalty rates was primarily due to lower average cost recoveries, resulting in increased inventor royalties for the specific portfolios generating revenues during the first quarter of 2015.

19

Three Months Ended March 31,

Change

2015

2014

$

%

(in thousands, except percentage change values)

Litigation and licensing expenses - patents

$

8,675

$

8,994

$

(319

)

(4

)%

Amortization of patents

13,038

14,472

$

(1,434

)

(10

)%

Litigation and Licensing Expenses - Patents. Litigation and licensing expenses-patents include patent-related prosecution and enforcement costs incurred by outside patent attorneys engaged on an hourly basis and the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by law firms engaged on a contingent fee basis. Litigation and licensing expenses-patents also includes licensing and enforcement related third-party patent research, development, consulting, and other costs incurred in connection with the licensing and enforcement of patent portfolios.

Litigation and licensing expenses-patents decreased due primarily to a minor net decrease in patent prosecution, litigation support and third-party technical consulting expenses associated with ongoing and new licensing and enforcement programs commenced since the end of the comparable prior year quarter. We expect patent-related legal expenses to continue to fluctuate period to period as we incur increased costs related to upcoming scheduled and/or anticipated trial dates, international enforcement activities and strategic patent portfolio prosecution activities over the next several fiscal quarters, as we continue to focus on our investments in these areas.

Amortization of Patents. The change in amortization expense for the comparable periods presented was due to the following (in thousands, except percentage values):

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015 vs. 2014

%

Amortization of patent portfolio investments made since the end of the prior year

$

1,074

(75

)%

Patent portfolio impairment charges

(2,565

)

179

%

Scheduled amortization related to patent portfolios owned or controlled as of the end of the prior year

105

(7

)%

Accelerated amortization related to recovery of upfront advances

(48

)

3

%

Total change in patent amortization expense

$

(1,434

)

100

%

Included in amortization of patents for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was accelerated amortization related to the partial write-down of a patent portfolio, due to a reduction in expected estimated future net cash flows, totaling $2.6 million.

Operating Expenses (in thousands, except percentage change values)

Three Months Ended March 31,

Change

2015

2014

$

%

Marketing, general and administrative expenses

$

7,328

$

6,928

$

400

6

%

Non-cash stock compensation expense

3,247

4,765

(1,518

)

(32

)%

Total marketing, general and administrative expenses

$

10,575

$

11,693

$

(1,118

)

(10

)%

Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses. Marketing, general and administrative expenses include employee compensation and related personnel costs, including variable performance based compensation and non-cash stock compensation expenses, office and facilities costs, legal and accounting professional fees, public relations, marketing, stock administration, state taxes based on gross receipts and other corporate costs. A summary of the main drivers of the change in marketing, general and administrative expenses for the periods presented, is as follows (in thousands, except percentage values):

20

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015 vs. 2014

%

Licensing, business development, engineering and other personnel costs

$

197

(18

)%

Variable performance-based compensation costs and other corporate, general and administrative costs

475

(42

)%

Corporate, general and administrative costs

251

(22

)%

Non-cash stock compensation expense

(1,518

)

136

%

Non-recurring employee severance costs

(523

)

46

%

Total change in marketing, general and administrative expenses

$

(1,118

)

100

%

Other Operating Expenses

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, a federal court decided that a lawsuit initiated in 2013 was exceptional. The respective operating subsidiary has taken steps to challenge the amounts requested including the filing of a notice of appeal. Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included an expense accrual for this matter totaling $426,000.

Income Taxes

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

(Provision for) benefit from income taxes (in thousands)

$

(170

)

$

1,372

Effective tax rate

1

%

(5

)%

(Provision for) Benefit from Income Taxes. Tax (expense) benefit for the periods presented included the impact of the following:

•

Tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 reflects the impact of a full valuation allowance recorded for net operating loss related tax assets generated during the period.

•

The tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2014 primarily reflects the benefit, totaling $1,735,000, from the reversal of the net deferred tax liability that existed at the beginning of 2014, other state taxes and full valuation allowances recorded for net operating loss carryforward related tax assets generated during the prior year period.

Our management believes that our cash and cash equivalent balances, investments and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements through at least May 2016 and for the foreseeable future. We may, however, encounter unforeseen difficulties that may deplete our capital resources more rapidly than anticipated, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Any efforts to seek additional funding could be made through issuances of equity or debt, or other external financing. However, additional funding may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. The capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption since late 2007, and the volatility and impact of the disruption has continued into 2015. At times during this period, the volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. In several cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers, and the commercial paper markets may not be a reliable source of short-term financing for us. If we fail to obtain additional financing when needed, we may not be able to execute our business plans and our business, conducted by our operating subsidiaries, may suffer.

21

Certain of Acacia’s operating subsidiaries are often required to engage in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights. In connection with any of our operating subsidiaries’ patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against us or our operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

Our consolidated cash and cash equivalents and investments on hand, excluding restricted cash balances, totaled $154.8 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $193.0 million at December 31, 2014. The net change in cash and cash equivalents for the periods presented was comprised of the following (in thousands):

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Cash receipts from licensees for the three months ended March 31, 2015increased353%, to $24.4 million, as compared to $5.4 million in the comparable 2014 period, primarily reflecting the net increase in revenues for the same periods, as discussed above. Cash outflows from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015increased56%, to $40.2 million, as compared to $25.8 million in the comparable 2014 period, primarily due to the net impact of the timing of cash receipts from licensees and related payments of inventor royalties and contingent legal fees, and the timing of payments to other third-parties in the ordinary course, for the same periods. Refer to “Working Capital” below for additional information.

Restricted Cash. In March 2015, an operating subsidiary of ours entered into a Guarantee with a bank in the amount of $10.7 million, in connection with enforcing a ruling in a German patent court granting an injunction against the defendants in the related patent infringement case. The Guarantee is secured by a cash deposit at the contracting bank totaling $10.7 million, which is classified as restricted cash in the March 31, 2015 balance sheet. See below for additional information.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Cash flows from investing activities and related changes were comprised of the following for the periods presented (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

Purchases of property and equipment

$

—

$

(96

)

Available-for-sale investments, net

5,210

34,398

Investments in patents/ patent rights

(16,861

)

(987

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

$

(11,651

)

$

33,315

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Cash flows from financing activities and related changes included the following for the periods presented (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,

2015

2014

Dividends paid to stockholders

$

(6,375

)

$

(6,255

)

Proceeds from exercises of stock options

938

90

Net cash used in financing activities

$

(5,437

)

$

(6,165

)

22

In April 2013, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of a cash dividend policy that calls for the payment of an expected total annual cash dividend of $0.50 per common share, payable in the amount of $0.125 per share per quarter. Under the policy, we paid cash dividends totaling $6.4 million and $6.3 million during the months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Working Capital

Working capital (including restricted cash) at March 31, 2015 decreased to $169.0 million, compared to $172.8 million at December 31, 2014. Consolidated accounts receivable from licensees increased to $30.0 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $20.2 million at December 31, 2014. Consolidated royalties and contingent legal fees payable increased to $19.1 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $14.4 million at December 31, 2014.

The majority of accounts receivable from licensees at March 31, 2015 were collected or scheduled to be collected in the second quarter of 2015, in accordance with the terms of the related underlying agreements. The majority of royalties and contingent legal fees payable are scheduled to be paid in the second or third quarter of 2015, subsequent to receipt by us of the related fee payments from licensees, in accordance with the underlying contractual arrangements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Except as set forth below, we have not entered into off-balance sheet financing arrangements, other than operating leases. We have no significant commitments for capital expenditures in 2015. We have no long-term debt. The following table lists our known contractual obligations and future cash commitments as of March 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Payments Due by Period (In thousands)

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than 1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

More than 5 years

Operating leases

$

7,730

$

1,131

$

3,151

$

3,281

$

167

Scheduled patent acquisition related payments

900

900

—

—

—

Total contractual obligations

$

8,630

$

2,031

$

3,151

$

3,281

$

167

Standby Letter of Credit and Guarantee Arrangement. In March 2015, an operating subsidiary of ours entered into a standby letter of credit and guarantee arrangement (“Guarantee”) with a bank in the amount of $10.7 million, for purposes of enforcing a court ruling in a German patent court granting an injunction against the defendants in the related patent infringement case. An injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a court order that compels the defendant(s) to cease marketing, offering for sale or importing applicable infringing products into applicable jurisdiction(s).

Under German law, in order to enforce the injunction granted by the court, a Guarantee is required to be furnished by our operating subsidiary, the plaintiff in the case, for potential payment to the defendants of any applicable claims which may be incurred by the defendants as a result of the enforcement of the injunction, only in the event that the aforementioned court ruling is subsequently successfully appealed by the defendants or otherwise amended. The Guarantee is required to be issued unlimited with respect to time, until appropriately extinguished in accordance with German law. The Guarantee will be extinguished when a relevant extinguishment order by the court having jurisdiction takes effect, typically occurring when the related infringement case has been settled or a final non-appealable decision has been issued by the court.

The Guarantee is secured by a cash deposit at the contracting bank totaling $10.7 million, which is classified as restricted cash in the March 31, 2015 balance sheet. The Guarantee expires on April 10, 2016, however, it is automatically extended without amendment for a period of one (1) year from the present or any future expiration date, unless at least 30 days prior to any expiration date, the Guarantee is extinguished in accordance with German law. The Guarantee facility fee is 1.15% per year, and the related expense is included in the statement of operations.

Uncertain Tax Positions. At March 31, 2015, we had total unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $2.1 million, including a recorded noncurrent liability of $85,000, related to unrecognized tax benefits primarily associated with state taxes. No interest and penalties have been recorded for the unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2015. If recognized, approximately $2.1 million would impact our effective tax rate. We do not expect that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months. There was no activity related to the gross unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented.

23

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while concurrently maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we invest in may be subject to interest rate risk and/or market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates, with respect to interest rate risk, or a change in the value of the United States equity markets, with respect to market risk, may cause the principal amount or market value of the investments to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the current value of the principal amount of our investment may decline. To minimize these risks in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, money market funds, high-grade corporate bonds, government and non-government debt securities and certificates of deposit.

At March 31, 2015, our short-term investments were comprised of AAA-rated money market funds that invest in first-tier only securities, which primarily include domestic commercial paper, securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies, U.S. bank obligations, and fully collateralized repurchase agreements (included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) and direct investments in highly liquid, AAA-rated, U.S. government securities.

In general, money market funds are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. Accordingly, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates or a 10% decline in the value of the United States equity markets would not be expected to have a material impact on the value of such money market funds. Investments in U.S. government fixed income securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. However, due to the relatively short duration of our investment portfolio, an immediate 10% change in interest rates would have no material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter (the quarter ended March 31, 2015) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls.

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must

24

be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

25

PART II--OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT

NUMBER

EXHIBIT

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Newest 8-K & 10-Q Forms

Site Links

Based on public records. Inadvertent errors are possible. Getfilings.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
This website is not associated with the SEC.