“Glyphosate does not cause adverse reproductive effects in adult animals or birth defects in offspring of these adults exposed to glyphosate, even at very high doses.”

However, in a 2011 Earth Open Source report, eight researchers question whether or not the industry along with government agencies including the European Union are obscuring information on glyphosate’s links to birth defects:

The public, in contrast, has been kept in the dark by industry and regulators about the ability of glyphosate and Roundup to cause malformations. In addition, the work of independent scientists who have drawn attention to the herbicide’s teratogenic effects has been ignored, denigrated, or dismissed. These actions on the part of industry and regulators have endangered public health. They have also contributed to the growing division between independent and industry science, which in turn erodes public trust in the regulatory process. [emphasis added]

The report cites 2010 research which demonstrated that glyphosate could cause birth defects in frog and chicken embryos even at levels much lower than those commonly used in agriculture today. While the EU currently has a maximum glyphosate residue limit in place of 20 mg/kg, some soybeans tested there have been found to contain nearly the limit at 17 mg/kg. The study, however, found that dilutions as low as 2.03 mg/kg caused malformations.

The European Union Commission completely dismissed these findings, citing the German Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, which in turn had used unpublished industry studies to back glyphosate safety claims.

Although this research was delivered to the commission, instead of considering it, the EU quietly delayed glyphosate’s official review (along with 38 other pesticides) until 2015, saving glyphosate from having to meet more stringent pesticide regulations that went into force in 2012.

The report reveals that even industry studies have concluded glyphosate is dangerous and causes malformations:

Industry (including Monsanto) has known since the 1980s that glyphosate causes malformations in experimental animals at high doses.
Industry has known since 1993 that these effects could also occur at lower and mid doses.
The German government has known since at least 1998 that glyphosate causes malformations.
The EU Commission’s expert scientific review panel knew in 1999 that glyphosate causes malformations.
The EU Commission has known since 2002 that glyphosate causes malformations. This was the year its DG SANCO division published its final review report, laying out the basis for the current approval of glyphosate.

In fact, it would appear that the EU has repeatedly dismissed independent findings that glyphosate causes birth defects — as well as a host of other serious issues including cancer, endocrine disruption, neurotoxicity, and DNA damage, in addition to reproductive and developmental toxicity. Earth Open Source notes that most of these studies are also at low concentrations.

In addition, the report notes that glyphosate was only tested by itself as a standalone ingredient. Roundup contains adjuvants and other supposedly “inert” ingredients in a formulation that was not tested before the product was sold. Studies have shown the combination of glyphosate and these adjuvants is actually substantially more toxic than just glyphosate alone. The new EU regulation would have addressed this, but Monsanto is skirting around it with the EU’s delay of the pesticide’s review.

Earth Open Source researchers are concerned that the commission may not fully re-assess glyphosate’s safety in regard to current science until 2030 now. “The beneficiary will be the pesticide industry; the victim will be public health,” the report surmises.

In response to the delay, the Pesticides Action Network Europe and Greenpeace filed a lawsuit against the EU.

What about glyphosate regulations in the U.S.?

Ha! Are you kidding?

At least the EU is going through the motions to appear to protect the people from unlabeled GMOs and toxic chemicals. Our government continues to show it is straight up owned by corporations, and Big Agra is no exception. Have you seen the revolving door chart for Monsanto and the American government lately?

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

About Ken McMurtrie

Retired Electronics Engineer, most recently installing and maintaining medical X-Ray equipment. A mature age "student" of Life and Nature, an advocate of Truth, Justice and Humanity, promoting awareness of the injustices in the world.

One important factor not mentioned in the post is the trend for other countries to acknowledge the real dangers and officially ban the product.
Results of an internet search “Round-Up banned:
Surely of great significance?

Technical HINTS:

TIPS:

To believe the mainstream media is to risk ever knowing the truth about the real world. To believe government, (any government), issued information without considering their agenda(s), is to risk being brainwashed.

WISDOM

"Our lives begin to end, the day we become silent about things that matter".--Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

"I am only a child playing on the beach, while vast oceans of truth lie undiscovered before me". - Isaac Newton

“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.” – Albert Einstein, who also said:
"The minority, the ruling class at present, has the schools and the press, usually the church as well. under its thumb. This enables it to organize and sway the emotions of the masses, and makes its tool of them!" And,
"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."

The art of writing is the art of discovering what you believe.
— Gustave Flaubert

Blog Stats

127,824 hits

WUWT UAH Temperature

Global UAH trend

Copyright Issues:

The use of outside content is with the intent to acknowledge the author(s) and publishing source. Any infringement of their copyrights is certainly unintentional. In such a case, immediate deletion of the material will occur together with an apology.
Any material of unsure status is assumed to be 'fair use'.
Original content on this site is copyright to 'The Golden Rule'. Reproduction is encouraged providing the author and source are acknowledged and the content is linked back to this site. Thank You!