Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Calling for Violent Jihad in Australia

There is not a Bible, Jewish or Christian, containing such incendiary
commentary as populates page after page of 'The Noble Qur’an', which for
four years has preached to the faithful in Canberra Airport's prayer
room. The ideology it promotes is violent jihad. It is a book to start a
war.

The Saudis, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt recently cut
diplomatic ties with Qatar and imposed sanctions, accusing the Qataris
of supporting terrorism. The Saudis have demanded that Qatar close
Al-Jazeera and cut all ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda,
Hezbollah and the Islamic State. Qatar’s long-standing and well-known
support for the Muslim Brotherhood, which aims to unify Muslim nations
under an Islamic caliphate and has networks of supporters across the
Middle East, is now perceived as a serious threat its neighbours.

This is the pot calling the kettle black, for Saudi Arabia itself has
a long record of exporting Islamic radicalism. Among its most notable
exports are millions of Korans in translation, which, through commentary
(mainly in footnotes) and accompanying materials, incite Muslims to
wage violent jihad to establish an Islamic state.

Among the Saudis’ exported Korans is an English-language edition, TheNoble Qur’an,
which can be found in mosques, prayer rooms and meeting places around
the world. Anyone who applies to the Saudi embassy in Canberra will be
sent a copy gratis.

The Noble Qur’an can be found in the musallah or prayer room of Canberra’s airport. What is apparently the same edition, with “AIRPORT MUSALLAH”written
in black marker pen on the page ends, has been sitting there for the
past four years, ever since the new airport was built. TheNoble Qur’an
is also publicly available in other “multi-faith” spaces that have been
springing up in institutions across Australia in recent years, in
universities, hospitals and other public places.
Canberra airport’s Noble Qur’an was printed by the order of
King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, who ruled from 2005 to 2015. It includes
the Arabic text, and, side-by-side, the English translation by Muhammad
Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali and Muhammad Muhsin Khan. There is also an
endorsement by Shaikh Abdul-Aziz ibn Baz, Chief Justice of Saudi Arabia
from 1993 to 1999, and a foreword by Shaikh Salih ibn Abdul-Aziz
al-Shaikh, the current Saudi Minister for Islamic Affairs. After the
Koranic text there are a hundred pages or so of appendices, and under
the text there are footnotes, which offer a commentary. There are also
frequent interpolations in brackets to help clarify the meaning in
translation.

Marked “not for sale”, vast numbers of The Noble Qur’an
printed by the Saudis are exported around the world. The King Fahd
Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an in Medina has printed over
one hundred million Korans in thirty-nine languages since it was
established in 1985. The handsomely gilded Noble Qur’an is distributed as part of the Saudis’ global da’wa or effort to propagate Islam. It appears to target two kinds of readers.

First, TheNoble Qur’an seeks to enlist Muslims in
violent jihad against non-Muslims, to establish an Islamic caliphate.
Second, it aims to engage with Christians. The longest essay in the
appendices is an argument that Jesus was a prophet of Islam, and
commentary throughout TheNoble Qur’an—in the explanatory footnotes, the interpolations in brackets and the appendices—challenges and “corrects” Christian teachings.

Sometimes it is said that when people use verses from the Koran to
justify violence, they have taken them out of context. This criticism
cannot be applied to TheNoble Qur’an, which follows a
traditional Islamic method of interpreting the Koran in the light of
Muhammad’s example and teachings, known as the Sunna. In keeping with this tradition, citations from the Sunna supply the great bulk of the explanatory footnotes.

On non-Muslims
The footnotes in TheNoble Qur’an are repeatedly derogatory of non-Muslims.

For example, a note to Sura 10:19 (p. 272, fn1) quotes Muhammad to
say that human beings are born Muslims, and are “converted” away from
Islam by non-Muslim parents. For Jewish or Christian parents to raise
their child in their own faith is like mutilating them:

Every child is born on al-Fitrah, but
his parents convert him to Judaism or Christianity … An animal gives
birth to a perfect baby animal. Do you find it mutilated?

The Arabic phrase al-fitrah refers to the doctrine that the innate state of human beings is to be a Muslim.

The Arabic text of the Koran calls non-Muslims unclean (Sura 9:28), using a derogatory word (najas). The footnote to this verse explains about non-Muslims that:

Their impurity is spiritual and
physical: spiritual because they don’t believe in Allah’s Oneness and in
his Prophet Muhammad … and physical, because they lack personal hygiene
(filthy as regards urine, stools and [menstrual] blood). [p. 248, fn 2]

Sura 3:85 states that “whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it
will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of
the losers”. In the footnote commentary on this verse, TheNoble Qur’an quotes Muhammad to explain that Christians and Jews who die disbelieving in Muhammad will end up in Hell:

there is none from amongst the Jews
and Christians … who hears about me and then dies without believing in
the Message with which I have been sent … but he will be from the
dwellers of the (Hell) Fire. [p. 84, fn 1]

Sura 4:47 warns Christians and Jews that they should believe in
Muhammad, or else their faces will be taken away in hell, to which the
translators add, in brackets,“by making them like the back of necks; without nose, mouth, eyes”. The footnote commentary explains further:

This Verse is a severe warning to the
Jews and Christians, and an absolute obligation that they must believe
in Allah’s Messenger Muhammad … and also in his Message of Islamic
Monotheism and in this Qur’an. [p. 115, fn 2]

The Koran has verses which exhort tolerance of Christians and Jews. Yet TheNoble Qur’an takes
pains to emphasise that such verses have been cancelled by later
verses, following the Islamic contextual principle of abrogation (naskh). Here are two examples:

First, Sura 2:62 states that a Christian or Jew who “believes in
Allah and the Last Day and does righteous good deeds shall have their
reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they
grieve”. This could be taken to imply that Christians and Jews will be
accepted by God if they follow their faith properly. However, the
commentary on this verse clarifies that:

This Verse (and Verse 5:69) … should
not be misinterpreted by the reader … the provision of this Verse was
abrogated by Verse 3:85 “And whosoever seeks a religion other than
Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter, he will
be one of the losers” (i.e. after the coming of Prophet Muhammad … on
the earth, no other religion except Islam, will be accepted from
anyone). [p. 13, fn 2]

What this footnote is actually asserting is that Christians and Jews
will go to Hell unless they accept Islam, because earlier verses which
seemed to counsel tolerance have been superseded and cancelled by later
verses.

Second, Sura 2:109 states that Muslims should “forgive and overlook”
the Christians and Jews, “till Allah brings His Command”.Yet the
footnote makes clear that “the provision of this verse has been
abrogated” (p. 21, fn 1)by Sura 9:29. The later verse commands
Muslims to fight (that is, kill) Christians and Jews unless or until
they surrender to Muslims and pay tribute:

Fight against those who believe not in
Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by
Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad …) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews
and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and
feel themselves subdued. [Sura 9:29, p. 248]

Here again, a more tolerant verse is claimed to have been abrogated
by a later verse which commands violence against non-Muslims.

The meaning of jihad
Some Muslims have proposed that the basic meaning of jihad is peaceful struggle. In contrast, TheNoble Qur’an defines jihadas
waging war against non-Muslims to make Islam dominant in the world.
This jihad is obligatory for all Muslims, and rejecting this obligation
will lead to hellfire.
This interpretation is made clear in the glossary, where the entry for jihad is:

Holy fighting in the Cause of Allah or
any other kind of effort to make Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) superior.
Jihad is regarded as one of the fundamentals of Islam. See the footnote
of (V.2:190) [p. 873]

The footnote referred to is a comment on Sura 2:190, “And fight in the Way of Allahthose who fight you …” This footnote reads:

Al-Jihad (holy fighting) in
Allah’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the
utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars (on which it
stands). By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior,
(His Word being La ilaha illallah which means none has the right to be
worshipped but Allah), and His Religion (Islam) is propagated. By
abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and
the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an
obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape
from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this
duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite. [p. 39, fn 1]

Here TheNoble Qur’an is saying that the purpose of
jihad is to make Muslims dominant over non-Muslims, and Islam dominant
over other religions; Islamic warfare against non-Muslims is a kind of
missionary enterprise to spread the faith, and any Muslim who does not
fulfil this obligatory duty is a “hypocrite”.

What is bad about being a “hypocrite” is made clear by TheNoble Qur’an on page 906 of the appendices: a hypocrite will end up in the lowest depths of Hell, the place of worst punishment. TheNoble Qur’an
is teaching here that any Muslim who does not engage in and support
warfare to establish the dominance of Islam is destined to occupy the
hottest place in Hell, worse even than that occupied by non-Muslims.

In its footnote on Sura 27:59, TheNoble Qur’an quotes a
tradition of Muhammad which refers to jihad (p. 512 fn 1). (Here again
jihad is defined as “holy fighting”.) The footnote emphasises that
fighting non-Muslims is the best possible pious deed for a Muslim,
second only to becoming a Muslim.

The caliphate and universal war against non-Muslims
Sura 2:252 (p. 55, fn2, running on to p. 56) refers to Muhammad as a
messenger of Allah. The footnote to this verse reports that Muhammad’s
prophethood was distinguished by certain characteristics. Three of these
are:

(i) Muhammad was
victorious through fear or terror for a distance of one month’s journey:
“Allah made me victorious by awe (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey.”

(ii) He was the first prophet from Allah given permission to take booty from his enemies: “The booty has been made Halal (lawful) to me yet it was not lawful to anyone else before me.”

(iii) Unlike previous
prophets, he was sent to all mankind, not just to a specific group:
“Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only, but I have been sent
to all mankind.”

The implication of this third point is that everyone, everywhere is
obligated to accept Muhammad as their prophet, and the first two points
show that he was uniquely commissioned to wage war against disbelievers,
by terrorising and looting them. Muhammad is considered to be the best
example for Muslims to follow, including, it becomes clear, in these
aspects of his prophetic career. TheNoble Qur’an emphasises these aspects of Muhammad’s mission to activate them for jihad.

In its footnote on Sura 3:55 (p. 76, fn 1), TheNoble Qur’an states
that when Jesus returns he will impose Islamic law and break the cross
(that is, destroy Christianity). At that time Jesus will do away with
toleration of non-Muslims, so that “all people will be required to
embrace Islam and there will be no other alternative”. In other words
they will be compelled to convert by force if required.
This teaching about Jesus’s return is repeated in a commentary on
Sura 8:39 (p. 236, fn 1), and a comment on Sura 61:6 (p. 761, fn 2),
which states that this tradition is intended as “a severe warning to
Christians who claim to be the followers of ’Isa (Jesus) …” In essence TheNoble Qur’an tells
its Christian readers that when he returns Jesus will compel them to
embrace Islam, and all people on the earth will have to choose between
Islam and death.

In its commentary on Sura 9:29 (p. 248, fn 2) TheNoble Qur’an cites
a tradition of Muhammad about the Jews, which states, “The Hour (i.e.
the final hour) will not be established until you fight against the
Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, ‘O
Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’” So, at the end,
creation itself will cry out for Jewish blood.

In an interpolation in Sura 8:73, TheNoble Qur’an states
that Muslims of the world must not ally themselves with non-Muslims,
but join together “to make victorious Allah’s religion of Islamic
monotheism” (p. 242).It is explained in commentary that if
Muslims do not do this, there will be terrible disorder and tribulation
in the world, with wars and battles and calamitous breakdown of civil
society. This is because of the deleterious effects of non-Muslim rule.
Moreover, it is also wrong to have “many Muslim rulers”, because Muslims
should unite under one ruler, the caliph: “it is a legal obligation …
that there shall not be more than one Khalifah for the whole Muslim
world …” Furthermore, anyone who works to divide Muslims into different
groups under different rulers should be killed, according to Muhammad,
who is reported to have said, “When you all [Muslims] are united … and a
man comes up to disintegrate you and separate you into different
groups, then kill that man” (p. 242, fn 1). This can be taken to imply
that anyone who upholds the division of Muslims into distinct
nation-states, which is the international order today, stands under a
death sentence.

TheNoble Qur’an paints a supremacist vision of an
ultimate Islamic victory over non-Muslim religions, in which all
non-Muslims will be converted to Islam or killed. The text of Sura 3:110
reads:

You (true believers in Islamic
monotheism …) are the best of people ever raised up for mankind; you
enjoin al-Mahruf (Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam has ordained)
and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief, and all that Islam has
forbidden), and you believe in Allah. [Sura 3:110]

The footnote commentary on this verse explains:

“You … are the best of people
ever raised up for mankind” means, the best of the people for the
people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace
Islam (and thereby save them from the eternal punishment in the
Hell-fire and make them enter paradise in the Hereafter) … The people
referred to here may be the prisoners of war who were captured and
chained by the Muslims and their imprisonment was the cause of their
conversion to Islam. So, it is as if their chains were the means of
winning Paradise. [p. 89, fn 1]

This footnote is a reference to a tradition of Muhammad which states
that Allah is pleased to see people entering Paradise in chains. This
justifies making war on non-Muslims, and forcing them into Islam through
enslaving them; enslaving non-Muslims is a kindness to them, because it
enables them to attain Paradise.

This interpretation of Sura 3:110 is based on Muhammad’s teaching.
Could it have any application in today’s world, or is it just a dead
letter?

The very same tradition was cited by the Islamic State in the October 2014 edition of its magazine Dabiq, which included an article titled “The Return of Slavery Before the Hour”:

[Muhammad] said, “Allah marvels at a people who enter Jannah in chains.”
The hadith commentators mentioned that this refers to people entering
Islam as slaves and then entering Jannah [Paradise]. Abu Hurayrah … said
while commenting on Allah’s words, “You are the best nation produced for mankind” … “You are the best people for people. You bring them with chains around their necks, until they enter Islam.”

The same sentiment was also expressed by a Dutch Islamic State
fighter, Israfil Yilmaz, who blogged about the correct Islamic
motivation for sex slavery:

People [who] think that having a
concubine for sexual pleasure only have a very simple mindset about this
matter … The biggest and best thing of having concubines is introducing
them to Islam in an Islamic environment—showing them and
teaching them the religion. Many of the concubines/slaves of the
Companions of the Prophet … became Muslim and some even big commanders
and leaders in Islamic history and this is if you ask me the true
essence of having slaves/concubines.

The translators who crafted the commentary in TheNoble Qur’an,
and the Saudi leaders who endorsed the text, no doubt desired that
readers would take to heart the teachings they had laboured hard to
present. The evidence is that many have done so. The investment by the
Saudis of billions of dollars to spread the kinds of ideas found in TheNoble Qur’an has not been in vain, and the Islamic State provides the proof.

Evidence for their success is found in Israfil Yilmaz’s justification
for sex-slavery. This not only aligns with official ISIS propaganda: it
also is fully in line with the teachings of TheNoble Qur’an. Another sign of the influence of TheNoble Qur’an’s ideas has been the river of thousands of ISIS recruits flowing from Western nations to join the jihad in Syria and Iraq.

What does all this mean?
Ahmed Farouk Musa, a graduate of Monash University medical school in
Melbourne, told a forum on Muslim extremism in Kuala Lumpur on December
7, 2014, that TheNoble Qur’an incites violence against
Christians and other non-Muslims: “I believe that propaganda such as the
Hilali-Khan translation and other materials coming out of Saudi Arabia
are one of the major root causes that feed extremist ideas among
Muslims, violence against Christians and other minorities.”

There is not a Bible in print, anywhere in the world, Jewish or
Christian, which contains such incendiary commentary as is found on page
after page of TheNoble Qur’an. This is a book with which to start a war. The ideology it promotes is primed to light the fuse of violent jihad.

Given its contents, it might seem surprising that a copy of TheNoble Qur’an has
been sitting in the Canberra airport prayer room for the past four
years. The theological characteristics of this edition of the Koran are
not a secret. Yet it seems no Muslim who used the musallah has
objected, or if they did, the Canberra airport authorities paid no
attention. Canberra’s politicians and their many advisers also regularly
pass along the corridor where the musallah is located, but none
of them seems to have thought to check what version of the Koran was
being used in their airport’s prayer room.
Earlier this year the Public Health Association of Australia asked
the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade to reject
the “notion” that there is any inherent link between Islam and
terrorism. It seems that Public Health Association of Australia
officials have also not visited the Canberra airport musallah to read its Koran.

There has been much discussion and sometimes puzzlement about how
young Muslim men have become radicalised enough to fight for ISIS.
Reading and believing the messages implanted in TheNoble Qur’an in the Canberra airport prayer room would be sufficient to convert some people to the key points of the ideology of ISIS.

The message of TheNoble Qur’an is no marginal
phenomenon. It is not an opinion from the extremities of the Islamic
world, but from its heartland, presented as a gilt-edged free gift from
the Saudi king, the Guardian of the Two Holy Mosques. The political
theology of TheNoble Qur’an aligns with the official
dogma of Saudi Arabia, and it has been endorsed by the Saudi king and
the nation’s chief justice, the Grand Mufti.

It is necessary to grasp the authenticity of TheNoble Qur’an and its message to the world. Those behind TheNoble Qur’an manifestly
believe that justice will be served only when Muslims rule the world,
and that warfare necessary to achieve this goal is not only justified:
it is a divinely instituted, inescapable obligation incumbent on every
Muslim, because Muhammad and his Koran are, as Sura 21:107 puts it, “a
mercy to the worlds”.

One sometimes hears the view that it is not up to non-Muslims to
express opinions about Islam or its canonical texts, such as the Koran.
But TheNoble Qur’an’s running commentary on the text,
because it has so much to say about non-Muslims, especially Jews and
Christians, therefore gives non-Muslims, especially Jews and Christians,
every right to form their own opinions about it. If a book talks about
you, you have a right to make up your own mind about what it has to say.

In 2002 Christopher Hitchens fielded a question from Tony Jones on ABC’s Lateline
as to why young, mostly well-educated men committed the 9/11 atrocity.
Hitchens’s answer was, “Well, it could be they believe their own
propaganda.” We have to assume that those responsible for TheNoble Qur’an believe their own propaganda too, and that some who have read it have been influenced to believe it too.

What should Australians make of the fact that the Saudis have been
presenting an open and unashamed apology for violent jihad, even
commending the practice of enslaving enemies, in our own backyard for
years, not to show Islam in a poor light, but to glorify it?
The fact that TheNoble Qur’an is in the Canberra airport musallah is no accident.This
edition of the Koran and the teachings it promotes can be found in
Islamic bookshops, public libraries, prayer rooms and Sunni mosques all
over the English-speaking world.

The British historian Tom Holland recently produced a documentary on ISIS called The Origins of Violence. A scathing review by the English journalist Peter Oborne was published in the Middle East Eye.
Oborne excoriated Holland for suggesting that the problem with ISIS
lies with Islam. Oborne found it repugnant to suggest that there is
anything about Islam that might be considered a “threat”, and he railed
against Holland’s suggestion that there could be anything in the example
and teaching of Muhammad (whom Oborne respectfully calls “The Prophet”)
which could have guided the actions of the Islamic State.

Such ignorance is the fruit of religious illiteracy. Or might fear be
the issue? Has Muhammad, praised in the pages of the Koran for being
“victorious by awe”, now extended his reign of fear, not just for the
distance of one month’s journey as Muhammad declared he had achieved in
seventh-century Arabia, but across fourteen centuries to Australia and
the rest of the world?

Of course many Australian Muslims would, like Ahmed Farouk Musa, find
the messages promoted through the footnotes and glosses of TheNoble Qur’an utterly repugnant.It
is disappointing that these well-meaning Muslims have not been able to
determine which version of their own scriptures is to be placed in a
public prayer room designated for their use. They could have lobbied
Canberra airport to have this version of the Koranreplaced by another, but if they have done so, their attempts must have failed.

The message contained in TheNoble Qur’an and its
widespread public distribution are matters Australians have every right
to be concerned about. Its message has been promoted in public for years
with hardly a whisper of objection coming from those who should know
better.

It would be inappropriate, and indeed irrelevant if our leaders were to respond to the message of TheNoble Qur’an with
statements like “True Islam does not promote terrorism” or “No true
religion supports violence”. For Australian officials to dare to
instruct the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia or the Guardian of the Two Holy
Mosques on what is true Islam would be ludicrous and offensive. But the
leaders of our nation, against whose non-Muslim citizens TheNoble Qur’an incites such undisguised enmity, have every right to say, “Not in our backyard!”

Dr. Mark Durie is
an academic, human rights activist, Anglican pastor, a
Shillman-Ginsburg Writing Fellow at the Middle East Forum, and Adjunct
Research Fellow of the Arthur Jeffery Centre for the Study of Islam at
Melbourne School of Theology.

3 comments:

The Koran is an evil book in my opinion, and is proven to be so by the trail of murder and mayhem perpetrated by Islam accross the centuries. Anyone who reads it must see that it has no moral message to offer like other holy books, but seems only intent on dominating all other religions, such is its supremacist message.

Any clear thinking muslim must be embarrassed about the koran and what it extols. And those capable of honest thought in the West must realise that islam brings nothing of any benefit to their new host cultures. In terms of culture and technology everything that they want - the West already has - that's why they moved here in the first place. And pretty much everything they have - the West does not want or need.

AND MORE LINKS

Buy Sister Religions

Buy THE THIRD CHOICE

About Me

Dr Mark Durie is an academic, human rights activist, pastor, Shillman-Ginsburg Fellow at the Middle East Forum, and Adjunct Research Fellow of the Arthur Jeffery Centre of the Melbourne School of Theology. He has published many articles and books on the language and culture of the Acehnese, Christian-Muslim relations and religious freedom. Holding a PhD in Linguistics from Australian National University and a ThD in Quranic Theology from the Australian College of Theology, he has held visiting appointments at the University of Leiden, MIT, UCLA and Stanford, and was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities in 1992.