Coming Soon: More Big Brother to Love

Share this post...

by Jayne Lyn Stahl

Over the past several months, the FCC and Justice Department have been working overtime, and fighting hard to tap not only your landline phone, your cellphone, but to tap Internet phone calls, as well.

Effective in May, those who provide "voice transmission," and broadband services will have to ensure that their equipment that is wiretap-ready, and accessible to your local police force, and the FBI. The new legislation is modeled after the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement, or CALEA, which was designed primarily to facilitate wiretaping of mobile phones. This new legislation is intended to expand governmental surveillance powers to cover companies like Vonage, so the progression evolves thus: first we can tap Ma Bell, then Cingular Wireless, then Yahoo emails, then Vonage.

The rules set to go into effect in a couple of months have been
challenged by a U.S. appeals panel, back in July, at which U.S.
District Judge Harry T. Edwards called courtroom arguments made by
theFCC "goobledygook." (VoIP News Net) He was, in my opinion, being
kind. Civil liberties groups have expressed outrage over the FCC
expansionism claiming that this legislation doesn't take into account
the fundamental difference between the telephone, a vehicle for
conversation, and the Internet, a tool by which information is acquired
and conveyed. Lawyers for the government argued only that the 1994
intended to be applied to future technology; the Judge wasn't buying
that, and neither are we.

Moreover, sophistic claims by the Justice Department that not
increasing wiretapping capability to encompass the rapidly
proliferating Internet phone industry will transform the Web into a
refuge for "criminals and terrorists" are not only hackneyed, they're
transparent enough for a six year old to see through.

Alarmingly, with all the discourse about theoretical differences
between online, and real time telephonics, what seems to have been lost
in arguments for and against the FCC's new rules to require ISPs to
ensure that their equipment can be hacked by law enforcement is that
this is yet another pernicious step on the part of this administration
to use technology that is so advanced that it can inherent sidestep
FISA, and warrants and, in effect, cut right to the chase; the chase,
of course being, access to your personal conversations and mine.

Those judges on the panel who attempted to justify court-ordered
wiretaps of Voice Over Internet Protocols, like Vonage,using the flawed
logic that they are essentially no different from traditional
telephonesare myopic in their inability to acknowledge inevitable
future technological inroads, and the potential threat to the First
Amendment that inheres in laying the groundwork for this kind of
Internet eavesdropping by the government on unsuspecting, and
undeserving citizens.

Caveat emptor; if we, consumers, stand by and allow the expansion of
federal eavesdropping from basic phone calls to cell phones to emails,
and now to Skype, or Internet, calls, then we have only ourselves to
blame. It's time that not only civil libertarians, but Internet Service
Providers, stand up to this administration's ongoing assault on
privacy, and the First Amendment.Congress is threatening to use the
power of the purse to prevent military expansionism,we must likewise
consider a boycott of those companies, and service providers, who
comply with these new rules thatare scheduled to go into effect in May.