Friday, December 30, 2011

Obama and his family as people are proving socially beneath contempt and my opinion of him puts this low life as a person at beneath my notice - of him as a person of whatever color or persuasion. He hovers in the region of the reasons why I would never accept to sit and eat with my servants back in Iran. They did not have the capacity to deal with this confusing "elevation". Not because I was snobbish.

What I cannot stomach is what he and his family do by abusing/mis-spending abusing/misusing America and hypocritically living on "do as I say, not as I do"! Exempting themselves from any decent human behavior or consideration of what is best for America rather than what they selfishly want for themselves and their self-gratification. Including selling out our nation to Islamic agendas.

====================================================================

Here are some examples of their mindsets:

On a $4M Vacation, Michelle Seeks $3 From Backers
by Keith Koffler on December 30, 2011, 1:21 pm

Speaking from her paradisical (PARASITICAL?) $4 million Hawaii vacation, Mrs. Obama wants to know: Do any of President Obama’s supporters have $3 to spare for his reelection?

This is approximately like coming upon Warren Buffett on a street corner with a McDonald’s cup asking if he can have 15 cents.
Michelle’s request was part of an email sent to the Obama 2012 list today.

Over the next 11 months we’ve got an organization to grow, voters to register, and people to get fired up.

I hope you’ll close out this year by donating $3 or more now to help make sure we’re ready for the next one . . .

Thank you so much, and happy new year,

Michelle

The obscene juxtaposition of the first lady on a $4 million (two week) vacation while asking what would have to be middle to low income earners for three bucks – who else would they be targeting with such an appeal? – is yet another example of lack of perspective the Obamas seem to be gaining while in power.

Mrs. Obama takes extravagant vacations to Spain and southern Africa. The president golfs obsessively and is currently dining at Honolulu’s ritziest restaurants. All while asking their fellow Americans to “sacrifice” during this time of not plenty.

And they blow $4 million – mostly taxpayers’ money – on a vacation, while wondering if the small people can come up with $3.

What about renting a beach house next year at the Jersey shore? I mean, if we’re all going to sacrifice.

And NOT have these low class "wannabees" /parasites emulate French history (mostly atttributed to Queen Marie Antoinette) and angrily shout " if they cannot afford BREAD to eat let them eat CAKE!" at the poor in America. While the White House cooks them $120 a pound beef! All the above at taxpayer costs!

Alan note: they are very low class nouveau riche "parvenues" who would never be accepted in any decent society without the current White House vehicle. Or as might be termed in America, "trash".

Carney Dodges Questions on Michelle’s Hawaii Flight

by Keith Koffler on December 17, 2011, 9:26 pm

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney Friday declined to answer questions about whether it is appropriate that First Lady Michelle Obama is travelling separately from the president to her Hawaii vacation, forcing taxpayers to pay for two flights to get the family out there.

Obama had to delay his vacation while Congress wraps up its business. Michelle left anyway.

The price tag for the first lady’s separate travel is likely in excess of $100,000, and quite possibly a lot more.

Carney declined to comment on the wisdom of billing taxpayers for an extra trip. Making matters worse for the West Wing – the first lady’s offices are in the East Wing – Obama only recently issued a directive urging agencies to cut down on miscellaneous costs like travel.

Carney appeared to be obliquely criticizing my story earlier this week on Michelle’s travel, calling the piece “interesting” but not detailing any specific objections.

If anything, I’ve been conservative in my estimate, since the one-way cost of the Air Force jet that ferried her there is in excess of $60,000, and the plane presumably has to be flown back to the mainland. And then there’s security, logistics, and a possible cargo plane flight that often accompanies first ladies on such trips.

Here’s the exchange between Carney and a reporter.

Q Yes. The First Lady is going to be leaving in a few hours for Hawaii. Obviously she isn’t able to go with the President. But I wanted to ask, isn’t it quite an extravagance — four people to go in two jets to Hawaii — particularly given the state of the economy, the state of the budget, and also given the directive that was just put out about limiting air travel by the administration?

MR. CARNEY: Two things, Mike. First of all, I think you ought to check your sourcing on that. I think the original story was an interesting one. But the First Lady and their daughters –

Q — another story, but –

MR. CARNEY: The First Lady and their daughters will be traveling today, as originally planned, for their annual holiday trip to visit their family in the President’s home state of Hawaii. As previous First Ladies have done, they will travel on a military aircraft.

Q But, I mean, couldn’t they wait, everybody go on one — so there’s one jet instead of two.

MR. CARNEY: Well, I think it was that –

Q I mean, Air Force One is $185,000 an hour to operate, and that’s a long flight (to Hawaii).

MR. CARNEY: Again, as previous First Ladies have done, they will travel on a military aircraft. As previous First Ladies have done, they will travel separate from the President on a — and that has been a practice in previous administrations. As you know, the President has made clear for a long time now that he will stay to ensure that Congress gets its work done.

It also seems Carney is trying to suggest that the first lady’s separate travel was routine and pre-planned. NOT SO!

If it was scheduled as a separate flight, this would still be due to the threat of her having to miss a few days of vacation, since the plan in the past has been that they go together. The Obamas traveled to Hawaii together in 2009 and were supposed to in 2010, when Obama was also delayed and she decided to leave on time on a separate flight – also at a cost of tens of thousands to taxpayers.

White House: No Round Trip Excursion for Bo

by Keith Koffler on December 24, 2011, 10:55 pm

The White House says First Dog Bo was not flown back from Hawaii to be with the lonely President Obama in Washington and to attend at photo op with him at PetSmart.

Apparently, a report in the Chicago Sun-Times saying Bo had gone to Hawaii with Michelle and the girls last weekend was not correct, and a Bo sighting reported by the Honolulu Star-Advertiser was mistaken.

White House Dossier earlier this week reported that either these stories were wrong or Bo had turned tail and come back home!

Now – this is pretty funny – the man who reported the Bo siting has released a statement saying he made a mistake. Very fancy.

From the follow-up Star Advertiser story:

This afternoon, Miscovich released the following statement: “It is now clear my wife saw another black dog walking our neighborhood. We would like to apologize to Bo and the Obama family for any inconvenience this may have caused them. We would also like to wish them a peaceful and Merry Christmas.”

Iran's mullahs have repeatedly indicated their willingness and ability to help restore order in Iraq, on the condition that the United States pack up and leave the region. And now that U.S. forces have left Iraq, the Islamic regime clearly is one of the strategic winners in this deadly game. The mullahs have also pledged on their Boy Scout's honor, although they have never been Boy Scouts, that their nuclear program is strictly for peaceful purposes. As a further gesture of goodwill, these self-appointed custodians of Allah's Earth are volunteering to serve as unpaid policemen of the entire Persian Gulf region, protecting vital U.S. interests, just like the shah did before them. Sounds like a great gift package from the kindhearted do-gooders of Allah.

(Alan note: little know factlet - they are also trying to get control of elderly patients' minds AND identities by offering Islamic "volunteers"/activists - free of charge - to elderly care homes in the USA , whose care is paid, for the most part, to contracted providers by taxpayer money).

And to these devoted faithful, there is no higher purpose in the world than serving Allah's bidding, as they like it and as they interpret it.

Keep in mind that the very name "Islam" means "submission" -- unquestioning submission to the will of Allah.

Qur'an 33:36 "It is NOT for a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter, that they should [thereafter] have any choice about their affair. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has certainly strayed into clear error."

And in the Quran itself, Allah gives these fellows their mandate: cleanse the earth from all kefir (infidels), and help usher in the Golden Rule of Islam over a corrupt world. This high-purpose strategic goal of Islamization legitimizes any and all tactics.

Qur'an 8:39 "Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah."

Allah, in his kindness, leaves a bit of wiggle room for the unbelievers. Those who refuse to convert or whose lives are spared may live under the rule of Islam by paying poll taxes (jizya).

Qur'an 9:29 "Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission."

These men of Allah are urged to use every "stratagem of war," to kill and take the disbelievers as captives. The ones they do not kill, mostly women and children, they take as booty of war and slaves. These devotees of Allah have been and continue to be among the most persistent practitioners of slavery.

Qur'an 9:5 "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."

Alan note: has the current Administration not done this both internationally and to a large degree inside America?

"Every stratagem" means every stratagem.

No heinous act is out of bounds for these savages. They place children, for instance, in the backseat of a car bomb so that it can be waved through checkpoints without inspection. Then, the adults park the car in the midst of a shopping crowd, run out of the car, and detonate it with the children inside. Horrific? Shocking? Barbaric?

These are the same people who used thousands of Iranian children as minesweepers during the Iran-Iraq war to clear a path for their more valued armored vehicles.

Alan note: But, they were provided with WOODEN rifles and a plastic key to paradise! (sarcasm)!

And as for Iran's mullahs' unyielding drive to acquire the ultimate weapon, it is in obedience to the command of the Quran. And "terrorism," abhorrent to the civilized world, is explicitly enjoined of the faithful.

Qur'an 8:59 "The infidels should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them. They are your enemy and Allah's enemy."

And for those who advocate retreating to the safety of "fortress America," the following warning should dispel their vain hope. Europe is already partly invaded, and America and other infidel lands are next. (In progress under Obama!)

Qur'an 13:41 "Do they not see us advancing from all sides into the land (of the disbelievers), reducing its borders (by giving it to believers in war victories)." (Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Iraq etc.)

It is worse than appeasement to negotiate a "deal" with the Iranian theocrats because any deal struck with these mullahs is only another ruse for them to further their plans.

The U.N. resolutions are nothing more than pieces of paper good for burning; they can pass them all they want, president Ahmadinejad proclaims belligerently. These Islamists go by their 1,400-year-old charter of Allah, the Qur'an -- the same charter that they hold in one hand while slashing the throat of an innocent infidel and yelling joyously that "Allah is the greatest" the whole time.

To the misguided "Supreme Guide," mullah Ali Khamenei of Iran, a few words are in order. The civilized Iranians, descendants of Cyrus the Great, find you, mullah Ali Khamenei, and your cabal of Islamists guilty of heinous crimes.

A partial list of charges is given below.

Domestically

* You do not represent the Iranian people. You are an Islamist terrorist. You are a usurper of power. You are guilty of transforming a noble nation into a world pariah.

* You are denying and violating a long-suffering people all its human rights.

* You are guilty of beating, imprisoning, and torturing a few dozen women who braved participating in a peaceful demonstration pleading for equal family rights on the recent International Women's Day.

* You systematically beat, rape, imprison, and torture all manner of citizens, from schoolteachers to students to union workers, for daring to raise their voices against the plight to which you have subjected them.

* You have savagely beaten and hauled to your dungeons of torture and death over a thousand of the tens of thousands of teachers who had gathered in front of the parliament requesting nothing more than their back pay and living wages.

* In late 2009, you ordered the Basij forces, revolutionary guards, and plainclothes and government forces to massacre thousands of innocent people in a mass popular uprising over the fraudulent presidential election of your puppet, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

* You direct systematic genocidal measures against all non-Shi'a religious minorities, with Baha'is as prime target, and

genocidal actions against political groups;
support of international terrorism;
demolition of religious sites and cemeteries;
for rape, torture, and summary execution of prisoners of conscience;
forgery of documents, acts of blackmail, and fraud;
and much more.

* You arrest some Christians -- even your Qur'an calls them "People of the Book" -- for observing Christmas.

* You implement barbaric practices of stoning, hanging, and amputations for those who are convicted of crimes in your kangaroo courts without due process. You even imprison those few lawyers who rise in the defense of the innocent.

* You plunder, mismanage, and dole out Iran's national wealth with the result that the great majority of the people are living in poverty. Iranian women are forced into prostitution to survive or simply sold as sex slaves in Persian Gulf states.Alan note: often in brothels and Persian Gulf hotels owned by the clerics!

* Your fascist misrule of nearly three decades has driven millions of Iran's best children to the four corners of the world. Hundreds of thousands of educated Iranians are compelled to continue the exodus, depriving Iran of sorely needed talents at home.

* You spend a fortune on the nuclear program that you claim is aimed only at peaceful purposes, while turning Iran into little more than a gas-station nation, with its precious oil wealth squandered and its facilities on the verge of collapse through neglect.

* You have created a suffocating social atmosphere that has driven masses of the people to the use of hard drugs as a way of numbing their pain.

Internationally

* You look far and wide to support any and all terrorists. Your delusional theology mandates the creation of horrific conditions in the world so that your Hidden Imam is compelled to appear and establish his rule.

Alan note: Obama, for his attitudes and activities was named the End Times Imam by some Islamic sects

* You spare no efforts at sabotaging any settlement between the Palestinians and Israelis. You arm and train all Palestinian factions such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and any and all that come.

* You direct similar criminal schemes on your eastern flank, in Afghanistan. You consider any democratic system the enemy of Islamofascism, and rightfully so.

* You work ceaselessly, expand Iran's stolen funds, and do all you can in support of your Shi'a co-fascists Hezb'allah in Lebanon.

* Your hands are dripping with the blood of thousands of Iraqis, victims of your bloodthirsty mercenary kin aiming to kill a budding democracy in Iraq next-door.

* You supplied your mercenaries with armor-piercing projectiles for killing and maiming the coalition forces in Iraq. Your cowardly proxy-killing, by means of these roadside planted bombs, has taken the lives of hundreds of Americans.

* You interpreted the highly subdued reactions of the coalition to your savage actions as indications of weakness. So you found it in yourself to venture into direct confrontation by capturing lightly armed British sailors and marines in Iraqi waters.

* You are responsible for helping Syrian forces slaughter seekers of freedom.

* You directly orchestrated an attack on the British embassy in Tehran last month and called the action of your "thugs" "student protests."

* You plotted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador, Adel al-Jubeir, on U.S. soil.

To misguided advocates of negotiation with the devil (mullahs), beware. The mullahs are on an Allah-mandated mission. They are intoxicated with petrodollars and aim to settle for nothing less than complete domination of the world under the Islamic ummah.

Alan note: in which Obama vies daily to acquire a top position through the Moslem Brotherhood.

And to you, the misguided mullah Ali Khamenei, don't be fooled by the sycophants who misinform you. Don't threaten the West by either as-yet-to-be functional nuclear weapons or your fantasized sleeper cells. You will be terribly disappointed when Iranian expatriates everywhere will be among the very first to help the authorities find your sleeper cells, if any actually exist, and put them into permanent sleep.

I also reiterate the words of Prince Reza Pahlavi that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei must be held responsible and tried in the international court for crimes against humanity.

Freedom may suffer retreats periodically, and tyranny may advance occasionally. Yet free people everywhere will meet any challenge and pay any price to safeguard the precious treasure of freedom for themselves and the finest legacy they can leave for the next generation.

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

As we enter 2012, the presidential candidates would do well to wrap their minds and messages around these seven mathematical facts:

1. Every day, the U.S. government takes in $6 billion and spends $10 billion. This means that every day the federal government spends $4 billion more dollars than it has.

2. The real unemployment rate is a jaw-dropping 11 percent.

3. Every fifth man you pass on your way to work is now out of work.

4. College graduates are now 34% less likely to find a job under Obama than they were under President George W. Bush.

5. Every seventh person you pass on the sidewalk now relies on food stamps.

6. The ravages of the Obama economy now mean that more Americans live under the federal poverty line than at any time in U.S. history since records have been kept.

7. Under President Barack Obama, every fifth child in America now lives in poverty...

These are not partisan jabs, manufactured statistics, or ideological swipes. These are mathematical facts. And the presidential candidate who can most clearly and credibly articulate them—and their concomitant solutions—is bound to win.

Why? Because these facts point toward the solutions America must implement to avert the kinds of economic and social upheaval seen in Europe and elsewhere.

Start with mathematical fact number one—deficit spending. No person, family, business, or nation can spend more than it takes in and remain sustainable; it defies the simple laws of math and reason. And yet even as Washington hemorrhages $4 billion more than it has each day, citizens have watched as the farce that is “Super Committee” has proven it cannot even shave $1.2 trillion from America’s $15 trillion debt.

The time for carping over the appropriate size of government is over. The laws of math have settled the argument: either we return to limited government or we face economic collapse. Those are the choices. Period. As Robert Samuelson noted yesterday, “We are shifting from ‘give away politics’ to ‘take away politics.’”

Mathematical facts two and three—11% real unemployment and 20% male unemployment rate—focus the nation on the priorities of spurring economic growth, eliminating Obamacare, and adapting to the realities of the digital economy. Why aren’t employers hiring? As a September 2011 report by UBS explained, “arguably the biggest impediment to hiring (particularly hiring of less skilled workers) is healthcare reform.” And lest one forget, Obamacare hasn’t even gone into full effect and won’t until 2014. Even still, under Mr. Obama, the average family’s health insurance premiums have risen $2,393.

As for the male unemployment rate, the problem is threefold. First, male graduation rates continue to lag behind those of women. Second, American manufacturing, which used to be a primary source of male employment, is dying a quick death. Third, incarceration rates of males continue to skyrocket. In 1982, there were 500,000 people in prison (the majority of them males). Today, that figure stands at a towering 2.5 million. And that is to speak nothing of those whose crimes do not warrant jail time but will nonetheless permanently appear on their record when applying for a job.

Once former inmates and those with arrest records attempt to enter the workforce, they will be slapped by the new reality of the digital economy: no longer can people with blights on their record fudge or fib on job applications; employers can and do run national background checks for a few dollars and the click of a mouse.

What this means is that the old days when a kid could mess up and rebound are rapidly evaporating as competition among job applicants becomes fiercer by the minute. Couple this with fact number four—a drop in college graduate employment from 90% under Mr. Bush to 56% under Mr. Obama—and the fierce competition of a digital age comes into sharp relief.

Facts five, six, and seven—1 in 7 Americans on food stamps, 46 million under the poverty line, and historic childhood poverty rates—speak to the failures of Mr. Obama’s entire economic approach.

Again, the argument over whether government should spend more on social programs has already been settled by the laws of math. Mr. Obama has added more to the national debt than all presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan–combined. The Keynesian experiment has been a miserable failure. Math doesn’t lie.
These seven facts mean that all presidential candidates must speak to a singular reality: America is a debtor nation. Indeed, America has $15 trillion less than the homeless man you see on the street. Put another way, that homeless man is $15 trillion richer than the United States of America. All the presidential candidates–including Mr. Obama–should stop and ponder that reality for a moment.

After all, it’s a mathematical fact.

Another reality appearing among Republicans, Independents and even Democrats is less focused on who the candidate is who opposes Obama to being given the opportunity to vote AGAINST Obama. Yes, even Democrats are seeing the light that neither they nor the USA can survive another four years of Obama.

Many believe they cannot survive the final year of his disasterous usurpation of office.

Despite your leadership of the “profit engine” of News Corporation owned by (alleged hacker backer?) Rupert Murdoch and a recipient of $23,000,000 in salary and bonuses last year, you have failed the American public by refusing to report (or allow reporting) the questions regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States.

One of your recommendations for success is for your staff to “read the U.S. Constitution.” When is the last time you read Article II, Section 1, clause 5, which states:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

With your extensive and impressive history in media production, politics, consulting and business, you have steadfastly refused to allow your staff to report on the most pressing matter possibly in the history of the country: whether or not the person currently occupying the White House has a constitutional right to do so according to Article II.

Another of your slogans is reportedly “See things other don’t. Do things others won’t.”

Then why won’t you? Why haven’t you?
During the 2008 presidential campaign, your reporters asked Obama no tough questions. You must have heard that even (Democrat) Chris Mathews of MSNBC stated in 2007 that Obama was born in Indonesia, as did a reporter for a Hawaii newspaper. Did that not make you curious?Apparently not. The fine investigative journalism which millions of Americans had come to expect from Fox News Channel was glaringly absent. The tough, tenacious questioning of E.D. Hill disappeared, only to be replaced by other blondes with shorter skirts and increasingly lower necklines but no ability to investigate anything.

You allowed a man who has hidden his past completely from the American public to gain a place on the ballot in every state and to actually be elected president without one scrap of evidence that he was constitutionally eligible.

None of your reporters ever performed any in-depth questioning of Obama during the campaign nor gained access to his background. Just when did he go to Indonesia, and what proof did you obtain that he was born in Hawaii?

How many people did you interview who knew him as a child, either in Hawaii or Indonesia?

Why did you not subpoena (FOIA?) his Illinois state senate and U.S. Senate records so that they could be open for inspection by the American people?

And your pompous, overrated evening host, Bill O’Reilly, whose slogan is “We’re looking out for you,” lied when he stated on-air that he had “seen” Obama’s original birth certificate.

He never saw any such thing, because no one has, at least not anything issued in this country.

O’Reilly has seen only what the rest of us have seen: an online image which has been widely debunked as a forgery due to its four different versions, alterations (affirmed by the state of Hawaii as invalidating the certificate), and contradictory statementsmade by two different Hawaii governorsunreported by a complicit media, which includes you.

If O’Reilly had seen Obama’s birth certificate, then Donald Trump wouldn’t be calling for it now.

Of all the cable channels, Fox News Channel has refrained the longest to report anything about the question of whether or not Barack Hussein Obama has a U.S. birth certificate.

Only recently have you been forced to allow the airing of this urgent matter because Donald Trump has raised it as an important constitutional issue.

Until now, your anchors nervously laughed off the question posed by Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, a decorated 18-year Army veteran and former flight surgeon, misrepresenting the matter by calling it “a political statement.”

Again, another blonde anchor who, instead of investigating before Lakin’s court-martial was posing, failed to report when Lakin was sentenced to six months at Ft. Leavenworth, having been denied discovery by a complicit, treasonous military as if he were living in the former Soviet Union.

Your reporters remained complicit about this travesty of justice and over more than two years as multiple lawsuits have been filed against Obama and even Congress, as the military ran scared, and now that a citizen is facing criminal charges for publicly exposing Obama’s lack of proof that he is constitutionally eligible to serve.

And what about that alleged Kenyan birth certificate, Mr. Ailes? Did you know that Mr. Smith has publicly stated that he will testify in front of Congress about its authenticity? What if he is telling the truth?

Recently your popular showman, Sean Hannity, has been labeled a traitor by a veteran of the U.S. military.

The fact that Donald Trump has recently released both his short-form and long-form birth certificates proves that O’Reilly was misinforming the public when he stated that he had seen Obama’s.

Why would Trump and millions of Americans still be demanding it if O’Reilly, your all-powerful arrogant media mogul, had seen it and shown it on national TV?

Besides, read the Constitution, Mr. Ailes! Being a “citizen” is not enough to be President!

Several months ago, Fr. Jonathan Morris made the statement on Fox & Friends Weekend that Obama was “born in a Muslim country, Kenya,” after which the three anchors nervously and vehemently denied it.

Rather than asking how Fr. Morris obtain his information, they tried to quell any curiosity about it and correct the record as quickly as they could to state that Obama was born “in this country.”

How do they know? Have they seen the birth certificate and not said anything?
In early 2009, I personally mailed to you presentments from the American Grand Jury charging Obama and others with treason and fraud. You did nothing.

Obama has unconstitutionally taken over the health, banking and automobile industries, and your anchors continue to soft-pedal and smile as they silkily mention “President Obama.” If the man is ineligible to hold the office, is a usurper who has committed massive election and possibly identity fraud against the American people, why are you even referring to him as the “president?”

Because you received the AGJ presentments, you also received a copy of the criminal complaint for treason filed more than two years ago by LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, a retired Naval commander with 25 years of service. More than 3,100 other citizens have done the same, and the FBI refuses to respond. What do you think that means, Mr. Ailes?

A retired military member accusing a seated “president” of treason should have been arrested, but he has not been. Neither the FBI nor the Secret Service has taken any action; instead, the complaint remains open and unanswered. Why do you think that is, Mr. Ailes?

Now that your obscenely-paid anchors such as Steve Doocy, Brian Kilmeade, Gretchen Carlson, Greta Van Susteren and Geraldo Rivera have had to choke out a few questions about Obama’s birth certificate and therefore his presidential eligibility with Donald Trump, you might as well have them begin reporting the following:

There are multiple ways to obtain a birth document in Hawaii, one of which includes merely a statement from one relative who has resided in Hawaii for a minimum of one year claiming that a birth took place.

Particularly in Obama’s time, no corroborating information was required. Perhaps this is why Obama does not seem to have an original birth certificate from the state of Hawaii and the reason why the state of Hawaii has obfuscated and refused to answer questions for almost three years.

Neil Abercrombie, the new (Democrat) governor, has even gone so far as to say that no original birth certificate exists for Obama, agreeing with former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams.

There is more than ample circumstantial evidence that Obama’s birthplace is Kenya, not Hawaii. Kenyan officials such as th[e ambassador to the United States and members of Parliament have stated such on the record. Why would you not report such information to the public? Is that not the purpose of Fox News Channel, or is your real purpose to push an agenda?

While on Monday evening, Greta Van Susteren played dumb when Donald Trump stated that Obama has spent millions of dollars to hide his original birth certificate, if he even has one, and lamely stated that she “hadn’t seen her birth certificate lately,”

Trump truthfully affirmed that Obama has concealed his past, official public service records, and that people “on the internet” are asking legitimate questions.

A follow-up report on his telephone interview with Van Susteren inaccurately stated that Trump “doesn’t want to become a ‘birther.’” He never said any such thing; rather, he said that the term “birther” is a pejorative to marginalize those who are asking justified questions about where Obama was born, whether or not he is eligible to serve, and what he is hiding about his past.

So despite having to now cover the issue, your reporters are still trying to deny that there is a serious question about Obama’s truthfulness, birthplace, qualifications and therefore a constitutional crisis in which every law and treaty he has signed, every appointment made, and every executive order issues, might be subject to invalidation.

Your staff has known about this potential problem for over two years but pretended that it didn’t exist, much to the detriment of your company. Years ago, I and millions of others relied on Fox News for accurate and timely information, but you have lost any credibility you once had.

I am in possession of documentation from the state of Hawaii which shows that the Hawaii Democrat Party changed the required wording on its nomination certificate for Obama and Biden in 2008. I had to prepare to file a lawsuit to obtain this information.

There is also evidence that it sought cover from the Democrat National Committee to certify that Obama and Biden were constitutionally qualified. Therefore, officials in Hawaii would not have been the ones to certify his eligibility if what we are now discovering was uncovered.

Why has your huge news organization not obtained and reported on such documentation which clearly reveals election fraud?

Moreover, why aren’t you reporting that Obama could never have been eligible because he inherited British citizenship from his father?

Even Obama himself admitted it. Why have you let all of this slip by without one report on it?

(Alan note: Why has your British owner not gone into British Kenyan/Protectorate Archive documents at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and examinied and published the birth ledgers? This is obtainable UNclassified information you refuse to obtain and share).

Instead, your anchors make fools of themselves by reporting that the “first celebrity” was “bounced from ‘Dancing with the Stars’” as our country sinks deeper and deeper into a Marxist coup and unparalleled economic crisis under a constitutionally-ineligible de facto chief executive.

And you continue to pay them their outrageous salaries for sitting there and looking good rather than reporting what is really happening.

And how about the accusations and evidence that Obama committed social security fraud? When will you be reporting that to the American people?

Notice how the report states that Col. Hollister could be brought up on charges when Obama is suspected of criminal wrongdoing!

Mr. Ailes, the charade is over. There is no “President Obama.”

There is a man who is foreign-born with a foreign father who no more qualifies as a “natural born Citizen” than the Pope. I

nstead of trying to cover up the truth, why don’t you return to your original mission which included the late Tony Snow and other reputable journalists who sought the truth, regardless of where it led?

Had you done your job in 2007 and 2008, our nation would not be close to destruction due to the election of an ineligible person to the presidency.

Instead, you aided and abetted the usurpation and have masked the many crimes of which there is ample evidence he has committed.

Even if only one or two of these chrges prove to be true, Obama’s crimes against America far outweigh those of President Richard Nixon.

Could there be any more pressing issue than whether or not the man making decisions to send our servicemen and women into war, sign legislation passed by Congress, appoint Supreme Court justices, signing treaties with foreign governments and invading sovereign countries is legitimate?

Monday, December 19, 2011

This eight minute video with Radio Farda is Farsi only so far. We will try to find time to turn the gist into brief headings for English speakers and post it here.

Basically, from memory, it covers the action of His Imperial Highness to try to indict Islamic Iran's Supreme Ruler Ali Khamenei as the person in charge of the regime brutality and like other suppressive/oppressive rulers recently pverthrown, face the charge of Crimes against Humanity or be removed.

He wants to do it under the aegis of a "united opposition", united in their effort to overthrow the regime not their ideology, which can be varied and not necessarily compatible with each other for future administrations. OTHER than separating "Church/mosque and State".

As we wrote some time ago, this push stems from the imminently approaching attack on Iran by the "West/Israel" and an effort by Prince Reza to stem that and the enormous cost of repairing damages and loss of lives of his people, by creating a strong movement to overthrow the current Islamic regime in a speedy but less or even "preferably" non-violent fashion.

Thus by removing the current mindlessly focused Khamenei regime on acquiring and using nuclear weaponry, making a millitary attack on Iran's population, wealth and treasure unnecessary.

Prince Reza has a responsibility to protect innocent Iranians as part of his leadership and cannot envisage or appear to consider the real solution to the problem of the current Islamic regime, which would require a much more drastic, cold-blooded, scrubbing/cleansing set of actions, which were described in a 2006 article (red link below).

Sunday, December 18, 2011

In a series of interviews, accompanied by about a dozen Iranian journalists who had managed to flee Iran over the mountains and reach Europe, then described the torture, rapes, abuses of not just rights but humanity in Islamic Iranian prisons perpetrated by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his middle son Mojtaba (in Iran and Syria), Crown Prince Reza has declared Khamenei should be tried in the Hague International Tribunal for "Crimes against Humanity".

Speaking to various audiences from France, Prince Reza Pahlavi pointed to various leaders of Islamic countries which had been removed for their "brutal" suppression of populist uprisings like Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Yemen and still in progress in Syria (under Iranian suppression forces) and compared to the slaughter and torture of dissidents in Iran which far exceeded those in the countries the West had "liberated", insisted the Islamic leadership of Iran should be brought to justice in a similar fashion.

Sadly, Prince Reza runs into opposition from Obama and Hillary's obedient and biased State Department, which repeatedly supports the Mullahs against the people of Iran and Syria. And whose thrust in foreign affairs insists on overthrowing opposition to the Moslem Brotherhood and strengthening a potential global Islamic Caliphate in which, based on his Islamic ties and parental background, Obama hopes to hold a senior governing position.

Obama's first step in his megalomaniacal journey is the destruction of America to validate his worth as a future Caliph or with becoming Secretary General of the United Nations (with 57 Islamic nation votes) as a stepping stone to his target "holy grail" of becoming Grand Caliph.

When this self-deluding, empty headed narcissist can arrogantly claim that he is the fourth best American president ever to have lived, his accession to ruler of the world on Islamic chariots seems quite rational and believable to him.

Specially as reportedly he is still gets high on drug use and like his inability to kick his cigarette habit he still has his long time cocaine 'monkey on his back'. The dependency potentially leading him into hallucinations of his own self worth.

Unlike other Presidents before him, his salvation is in Islam not American dreams and he has become less and less careful or concerned in letting his Islamic predilections, policies and preferences appearing openly.

Frankly, if he wins re-election, perhaps by suspending the Constitution and imposing martial law, he will feel empowered to rule by fiat/decree in a form of a "legislative" dictatorship, at most by bending our laws and ignoring restriction in other laws.

And if he fails to be re-elected he can attach himself to the Islamic movements he has helped establish in the USA, who will support his grab of power alongside his Oval Office based Moslem Brotherhood agents, who run the show.

AND ISLAMISTS

And his plans include a nuclear powerful Iran, which will grudgingly and disrespectfully go along with him, though already showing signs that they prefer to and intend to work with Saudi Arabia than with Obama.

His Imperial Highness the Crown Prince has started action to erode the Islamic Iran Republic position with his leadership and bringing the Hague court into play by lodging a case against Iran's Supreme Ruler himself and providing a ton of first hand evidence of the crimes against humanity.

What is far more telling are videos of brutality in Syria perpetrated by Iranian Ghods forces.

Abuses they no longer try to hide BUT now use to discourage other resistant activists.

Somewhat like the new violent suppression of revolt in Egypt, where the Military has decided "enough is enough" over Islamic driven insurgency inside Egypt

Here are some videos of Syrian/Iranian brutality inside Syria, where some 20,000 murderous Iranian Suppression Force and Iranian Special Force members have moved in over the past year to extinguish "unrest".

These are not intended to condone or glorify violence but to point out who and what Obama's best Islamic buddies REALLY are and apart from showing the brutality of their mindsets, mirror Obama's determined destruction of America by promoting, expanding and Constitutionally illegally imposing his chosen Islamic religion on an unwary, naive America!

The brutality is not a national trait of Egypt, Syria, Iran, Libya etc., but a long, deeply embedded MOSLEM one, which is being infiltrated quite rapidly into America by Obama and senior Moslem Brotherhood leaders he has installed in his White House and in policy making positions in the Eric Holder Dept. of INJUSTICE and Homeland INSecurity! As well as sprinkled into our Law Enforcement organizations.

WATCH THE VIDEOS BELOW AND GET A REAL TASTE OF A BEHIND THE SCENES VIEW OF WHAT IS BEING DESCENDED ON US IN THE NAME OF ISLAM AND SHARIA LAW. A bit like the Old Testament of the Bible being imposed on us as Christianity. The difference being that Islam does impose customs, laws and religious ideas dating back 1,400 years, all in the name of Allah.

In my mind Obama has only two BASIC positions to consider:

1. He will NOT be re-elected in 2012, but by then, will have turned America into such a scorched earth chaotic state of misery and financial ruin, NOBODY will have the time to pursue him after he quickly moves himself and family to KENYA (or a Moslem Brotherhood run country) after leaving office with the millions of Dollars he has acquired since becoming President.

Plus more millions he can call in as favors for the money he has passed to his cronies in clearly Conspiritorial and Accessory (before or after the fact) situations.

2. He WILL be re-elected in 2012 and will thus have all the time in the world and without pressures to meet re-election considerations, finish his destruction of America, while taking more and more time to play golf and multi-million Dollar vacations. There will not be enough of America left behind by him to even begin to organize legal retribution.

SIDEBAR: Obama has NEVER governed. He has either worked out ways to embed Moslem Sharia deep into America, implemented huge (multi-billions) fraudulent transfers of money to his cronies and campaigned to try to stick around and do some more of this.

His claim of having killed Osama (strong doubt exists as to HIS role in this - apparently barely any if at all - is offset by HIS LOSS of the unmanned stealth drone technology to our enemies.

He vetoed any effort to recover or destroy it, earning him brownie points with Iran and China to the detriment of over 20-years of research thus given to them as a gift. This negative is far greater than the plus of supposedly organizing the Osama project.

Or his feeble trying to save face by begging Iran to "pretty please" give it back!

AMERICA DURING AND AFTER OBAMA

WARNING!! GRAPHIC!! NOT FOR THE WEAK OF HEART OR STOMACH! NOT FOR MINORS!

Sunday, December 11, 2011

More than just corrupt, Obama is planning arrest and imprisonment of American citizens WITHOUT TRIAL (just like his Mullah buddies do in Islamic Iran). Just a short step to them dying in prison as in Moslem countries he espouses.

NOTE: VIDEO - Democrat Senator Carl Levin WAKING UP and testifying that Obama requested the removal of the safety clause that would protect U.S. citizens.

Proof Obama will sign NDAA 1031 Citizen Imprisonment Law in a few days

Be very careful with your vote this time around! And share this with your Democrat or Independent friends so they do not repeat their same mistake as last time and cast a vote for Obama or a Democrat Senator. It's no longer a matter of which party you favor but a matter of survival of YOUR country and family and friends.

Alan GENERAL Foreword: APPARENTLY HOLDER REFUSED TO BE PLACED UNDER OATH! To avoid any charge of perjury.This is in keeping with the treacherous administration under Obama, who preferred to deny to allow rescue or destruction of our unmanned stealth vehicle and offend Iran or most likely China which willl received the unit. Reports out of Iran say that it did not crash nor was brought down by Iran but landed as programmed after a technical problem and was taken by warlord Gulbudin Hekmatyar, head and founder of Hezb-Islami (Party of Islam) and given to Iran as a present and sign of co-operation with the Islamic regime.

On the other hand, there has been talk about the control signals that guide these units, often from very long distances, even Stateside, being interrupted and being vulnerable to interference. So there is till the possibility that the Iranians managed to hack the guide signals but it came down on the other side of the Afghan border and had to be recuperated. With Hekmatyar's assistance.

Watch the DOJ guy behind Holder's right shoulder after the Sandy Adams asks Holder about his PERSONAL e-mail about Fast & Furious at the 4:50 mark.

Soon after the 5 minute mark that DOJ guy becomes incredibly agitated to the point of rocking back and forth and even jumping off his seat.

If one didn't know better, one would think he had dropped a load in his pants. The video then cuts away from Holder but when it comes back you can see the DOJ guy had AGAIN completely left his seat and was plopping back down into it. Also notice later in the video when he is first grabbing his thumb and then nervously rubbing his hand.

I've seen this DOJ guy at all of Holder's appearances before the Congressional Committee. Until now he has seemed very impervious and calm. This moment recorded here was a STARK contrast to his previous demeanor.

He literally JUMPED out of his seat when Congresswoman Adams asked Holder about his PERSONAL emails to Lanny Brueuer and another DOJ person.

And WHO is that DOJ guy behind Holder who looked like he was in dire need of a Depends when Adams asked her question?

﻿﻿ "Sardar" (Islamic regime's term for their generals, to avoid using "Timsar" the former military appellation) Suleimani is not a face familiar to many in the West. In fact he is the least photographed man around and definitely NOT disclosing his photo can be lethally enforced in Iran.

But members of the rampaging Iranian mob which last week laid siege to the British Embassy in Tehran knew exactly what they were doing when they held aloft a picture of a grey-haired man, with downturned mouth and his beard more neatly trimmed than those of his country's religious leaders.

Qassem Suleimani, a fanatical Islamic revolutionary, has rapidly become one of the world's top terrorist suspects, as well as a powerful and sinister force within Iran. And founder of the "Sepah Mohammad" - the "Mohammad Force" division of the Qods Special Forces, is tasked with destroying any opposition to the Islamic regime, specially by Western agents.

AND carrying out violent/lethal projects inside foreign countries.

General Qassem SoleimaniCommander of 15,000-strong paramilitary Qods Special Forces

﻿﻿ The most recent plan, that Iran still tries to deny, was his attempt to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to the USA. And as icing on the cake to do it at a restaurant where Israeli diplomats were also likely to be eating.

Iran and Saudi Arabia have locked horns ever more intensely over Iran's nuclear program which endangers their monarchy as much as it puts Israel at risk! And fits neatly in the traditional conflict of Shia Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia.

At the time, his paranoid avoidance of being photographed meant that more than likely he was operating openly and UNRECOGNIZED in Mexico with little or no fear of being identified.

Plus with Obama castrating U.S. intelligence forces with his ban on any terrorist description using Islam or alluding to his Iranian or Moslem Brotherhood buddies - using Atorney General Eric Holdert to impose blockades on information flow, similar to President Clinton putting up a wall, through Attorney General Gorelick prohibiting sharing of information among law enforcement and intelligence agencies, Suleimani had and has little to fear from the USA.

He had a low level, untrained fall guy patsy set up to take the responsibility for an operation way above that man's experience and pretend he was paying for the Saudi hit.

What is perhaps to most notable, yet completely overlooked aspect of the British embassy take-over in Tehran is the fact that Suleimani ALLOWED (possibly encouraged) his photo to be brandished in a direct contradiction of his life-long profile of secrecy.

Why? Probably because he was taking an overt stand/position within the power struggle going on in Iran both among the clerics and in the various paramilitary forces like the IRGC, Bassijis and even with his Mohammad Division.

And establishing that he is more than just Commander of the Special Forces and overseas operations and will punish diplomatic missions inside the country - with impunity. - so watch everyone!

By the Way! Here are photos of one of his loyal operatives both inside Iran and at an Occupy Wall Street rally. Do they not resemble each other? Could almost be father and son or uncle and nephew. Touch up Suleimani's grey hair and beard and one could almost be the other.

You decide:

﻿﻿﻿

Karim JalaliIRGC - QODS

﻿﻿﻿

﻿

WALL STREET RALLY

﻿

This man could be wandering around your neighborhood in the USA or Mexico or South America! Possibly hidden among the Islamic terrorists who have found shelter in Canada.

Take a good look at his picture, imagine some intentional cosmetic changes and see if you can spot him. Then pick up a phone!

Kirk, a Republican, is the co-author along with Democratic Senator Robert Menendez of a proposal to penalize foreign financial institutions that do business with Iran's central bank, the main conduit for its oil revenues.

The Senate approved the proposal last week 100-0despite lobbying against it by Obama administration officials, who argued that threatening US allies might not be the best way to get cooperation in action against Iran.

A similar measure is pending in the House of Representatives; both chambers must agree on the same version before it can become law.

Kirk said on Tuesday that the administration had written to some lawmakers' offices and "proposed what they describe as technical fixes" to the Kirk-Menendez amendment.

But Kirk complained: "They are not technical fixes at all. They are meant to undermine the amendment." He and Menendez have written to fellow lawmakers as well, urging them to "stick with" the Senate-passed proposal, Kirk said at an event on Iran's nuclear program, sponsored by the conservative American Enterprise Institute think tank.

The United States and its western allies have supported multiple rounds of sanctions on Iran, seeking to persuade it to curtail its nuclear work. Washington suspects Tehran of using its civilian nuclear program to develop weapons, although Iran says its program is solely to produce electricity.

The Kirk-Menendez proposal would dissuade foreign banks from dealing with Iran's central bank by threatening to cut them off from the US financial system. The United States already bars its own banks from dealing with the Iranian central bank.

Last week, administration officials testified on Capitol Hill that they were indeed looking for more ways to sanction Iran's central bank, but in a calibrated manner, to avoid roiling oil markets or antagonizing allies.

A senior Senate Republican aide said the document that the administration sent to lawmakers' offices proposed lengthening, from 60 to 180 days, the grace period in the Kirk-Menendez proposal before sanctions would kick in for non-oil transactions with Iran's central bank.

The administration also sought to "water down the penalties" on foreign banks that do business with Iran's central bank, the Senate aide said. The administration favored imposing "strict conditions" on such foreign banks, rather than the all-out cutoff from the US financial system that is in the Kirk-Menendez amendment.

When does Obama treachery and support of self-declared ISLAMIC enemies of the USA cross the line and become treason and brand him a traitor?

Kirk charged that the Obama administration was simply trying to find "a way out for the administration, to say that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, but to take no effective action against the central paymaster" of the country's nuclear architecture.

The Kirk-Menendez proposal passed the Senate last Thursday as an amendment to a huge bill authorizing defense programs. A similar proposal to target Iran's central bank has passed a House committee and the House is expected to vote on it soon.

Monday, December 05, 2011

While checking statistics of RECENT visitors to AntiMullah, we came across this article posted back in 2007 but originally valid back in 2006. What caught our attention was that it appeared in the #10 spot on the Google Search under this category.

While from time to time we attain the #1 placing in certain categories, we like to check any article in the top 10. We do not know if the sites are still valid but in keeping with inform and educate, have a look for yourself.

WHAT WE FOUND FASCINATING WERE many LINKS IN RIGHT HAND MARGIN of that page under APRIL, leading to OTHER INTERESTING ARTICLES. You might want to check them out for yourselves. Treasure Hunt.

Sunday, December 04, 2011

Obama's Department of Justice is on a tear. Holder has sued, yet again, another company for lack of sharia compliance. Few companies can afford to go up against the US Department of Justice. It's a form of blackmail, extortion, that companies are forced to pay.

The Obama Islamic sharia protection racket.

America, snap out of it. Pass this on to your email lists. Get the word out.Four more years of this federally imposed supremacism and this country will be unrecognizable.

The EEOC said Julie Holloway-Russell had worn a khimar—a cloth that covers her hair, ears and neck, as required by her religious beliefs—when she interviewed for a job as a security guard at the Philadelphia-based firm in November 2009. However, she was told to remove the khimar when she reported to her first work assignment. After she refused to do so, she was terminated, said EEOC regional attorney Debra Lawrence.

Why did they hire her in the first place?

The EEOC said in its statement that in addition to the $50,000 settlement, the three-year consent decree resolving the lawsuit prohibits Imperial Security from further discriminating based on religion or engaging in unlawful retaliation.

A company spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment. Charges filed with the EEOC by Muslims outweigh those filed by individuals of other identified religious groups.

Yes, because Islamic supremacists are using our courts to impose the sharia.

Of course they file more lawsuits than any other group. Muslims are the first immigrant group that has ever come to this country with a ready-made model of society and government they believe to be superior to what we have here, and they mean to impose it.

Related: Obama's Department of Justice Sues, Forces School District to Pay $75,000 to Hajj-tripping Muslim Teacher

Obama's DoJ to Fight for Impostion of Islamic Law, Will challenge Missouri anti-Sharia law

Word seeping out of Iran about the Mallard explosion which killed General Moghadam-Tehrani, the top Iranian missile commander a few weeks ago, was caused by an external (air) attack of some kind.

Strangely Israel is NOT suspectedbut Obama is!

The same goes for the most recent Isfahan explosion, which as many suspected had little to do with the nuclear sites there but with destroying missile capability. Again by some form of attack from the air.

The word in Iran is that Obama was behind it all, so the Panetta vitriol against Israel is not that surprising as Obama tries to mend fences with his Islamic Iranian clerics and Moslem Brotherhood activists he seems to have temporarily thrown under the bus as he does with so many of his allies.

Or was it a repeat of the Ossama bin Laden operation which was carried out DESPITE a myriad obstacles Obama and Valerie Jarett put in the way to prevent it. Till finally Panetta and Hillary Clinton ordered the mission on their own and dragged Obama off the golf course to be seen to have been part of it.

He then jumped in trying to take credit for the "sucessful" mission, though much is still in doubt about it. And also, since he was not in on it, explains Obama's varied descriptions of the mission to which he was not really privy.

Push the replay button on the two recent Iran explosions at Mallard and Isfahan. Panetta and Hillary possibly took charge of weakening Iran's ability to deliver nuclear weapons even if they acquired them. Againwithout Obama's consent!

As their boss, Obama seems to be using them to make nice to his Islamic buddies and also make up for his hypocritical stated claims that he would never abandon Israel and was their champion forever!

His credibility with those around him has diminished badly under the weight of his lies to everyone.

Or maybe he was shown a news video of self-flagellating Islamists walking down a Los Angeles main thoroughfare, this week, beating and whipping themselves to celebrate the Islamic Moharram month of fasting.

This activity would be a Shia event - remember Islamic Iran is mostly Shia - and participants were reportedly Iranians, Pakistanis, Iraqis and a sprinkling of other Shia nationalities.

While Obama's background is predominantly Sunni, his only true accomplishment in the Oval Office is an Islamic rise to power around oil rich regions which will help fund the Moslem Brotherhood, now that he has removed Islamic leaders who opposed the Brotherhood from countries in the region.

Recently he barely tries to hide his bias. Or is beyond caring since he doubts he will be in that office a year from now.

Boom in Burqas, Veils, Headscarves, Turbans and Suicide Bomb Vests for Export to Gaza ExpectedComment: Iron Veil Descending Across the Middle East

An Iron Veil is descending across the Middle East--with the support of the United States. Ironically, the designer of the veil, Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, is the architect of the secret war that helped to bring down the Iron Curtain. His anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan began under Carter and continued under Ronald Reagan, who escalated the adventure into America's largest-ever covert operation.

Having won the Cold War with the aid of rightwing political Islam, or Islamism, the U.S. under Barack Hussein Obama now aims to use the clerical fascist creed to counter, contain--and crack apart--resurgent, non-Communist Russia and rising, Communist-in-name-only China. In spite of the 9/11 blowback--the slaughter of some 3,000 Americans on American soil by Islamists supported by Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan and the Pakistan-created Taliban--the U.S. is actually pursuing rollback, as opposed to mere containment, in order to control Eurasia (shades of 1984) in accord with Brzezinski's mad theories.

Democracy? Forgettaboutit! The U.S. policy is all about "geopolitics," "geo-strategy," and ... energy ... meaning, real energy, namely, oil and gas, on which the world runs and will continue to run for the next two decades. The dreaded "fossil fuels" of the Middle East and Central Asia ... and the hearts and minds ... and markets ... of "the Muslim world" are the prizes on which the administration ... and the Power Elite that backs it ... have their eyes.

In every way short of issuing a decree that Islam shall be the formal religion of the USA under an Obama dictatorship (still in the making), his Federal government is imposing an OBEDIENCE to Islamic Sharia quasi-religion on us CONTRARY to the USA Constitution, which forbids such action.

Obama Administration Bans Knowledge of Islam

(Alan note: as a method to conceal its harmful dogma and impossibility of any compatibility of Islam and its tenets and loyalties to Allah with our long established Constitution. In fact a complete conflict of the Islamic system with American social, judicial, religious and legal systems).

Posted By Raymond Ibrahim On December 1, 2011

The Obama administration’s censoring of photographs of the late Osama bin Laden, lest they “offend” Muslims, is one thing; but what about censoring words, especially those pivotal to U.S. security?

Weeks earlier, the Daily Caller revealed that “the Obama administration was pulling back all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive.”

(Alan note: imposition of Islamic "religious" preferences over those of the majority of Americans, thus forcing them to bow to Islam by his decree).

The move comes after complaints from advocacy organizations including the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and others identified as Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the 2004 Holy Land Foundation terror fundraising trial. In a Wednesday Los Angeles Times op-ed, Muslim PublicAffairs Council (MPAC) president Salam al-Marayati threatened the FBI with a total cutoff of cooperation between American Muslims and law enforcement if the agency failed to revise its law enforcement training materials.

(Alan note: this means an organized iuprising against the USA by Islamists and using extortion/blackmail to gain their illegal ends).

Maintaining the training materials in their current state “will undermine the relationship between law enforcement and the Muslim American community,” al-Marayati wrote. Multiple online sources detail MPAC’s close alignment with CAIR. In his op-ed, Al-Marayati demanded that the Justice Department and the FBI “issue a clear and unequivocal apology to the Muslim American community” and “establish a thorough and transparent vetting process in selecting its trainers and materials.”

Accordingly, after discussing the matter with Attorney General Eric Holder, Dwight C. Holton said “I want to be perfectly clear about this: training materials that portray Islam as a religion of violence or with a tendency towards violence are wrong, they are offensive, and they are contrary to everything that this president, this attorney general and Department of Justice stands for. They will not be tolerated.”

Even before these Muslim complaints and threats, President Obama alluded to censoring words when he said soon after taking office: “Words matter … because one of the ways we’re going to win this struggle [“war on terror”] is through the battle of [Muslims’] hearts and minds” (followed by oddities like commissioning NASA to make Muslims “feel good” about themselves).

As if there were not already a lamentable lack of study concerning Muslim war doctrine in the curriculum of American military studies—including in the Pentagon and U.S. Army War College—the administration’s more aggressive censorship program will only exacerbate matters. Last year’s QDR, a strategic document, does not mention anything remotely related to Islam—even as it stresses climate change, which it sees as an “accelerant of instability and conflict” around the world.

This attempt to whitewash Islam certainly has precedents, such as a 2008 government memo that not only warned against “offending,” “insulting,” or being “confrontational” to Muslims, but tried to justify such censorship as follows:

Never use the terms “jihadist” or “mujahideen” in conversation to describe the terrorists.

A mujahed, a holy warrior, is a positive characterization in the context of a just war.

In Arabic, jihad means “striving in the path of God” and is used in many contexts beyond warfare. Calling our enemies jihadis and their movement a global jihad unintentionally legitimizes their actions.

Aside from the fact that the above definitions are highly misleading, the notion that the words we use can ever have an impact on what is and is not legitimate for Muslims is ludicrous:

Muslims are not waiting around for Americans or their government—that is, the misguided, the deluded, in a word, the infidel—to define Islam for them. For Muslims, only Sharia determines right and wrong.

The U.S. government needs to worry less about which words appease Muslims and worry more about providing its intelligence community—not to mention its own citizenry—with accurate knowledge concerning the nature of the threat.

Without words related to Islam, how are analysts to make sense of the current conflict?

What are the goals and motivations of the “jihadists”? What are their methods? Who might be “radicalizing” them? Whom are they affiliated to? Who supports them? These and a host of other questions are unintelligible without free use of words related to Islam.Knowledge is inextricably linked to language. The more generic the language, the less precise the knowledge; conversely, the more precise the language, the more precise the knowledge. In the current conflict, to acquire accurate knowledge, which is essential to victory, we need to begin with accurate language.

(Alan note: apart from having senior Moslem Brotherhood activists operating out of his White House, Obama uses the Department of INjustice and runs interference against any attempt to limit or bring the real Islam into light so everyone can see it for what it is - instead of what it pretends to be so that it can infiltrate and destroy us).
This means U.S. intelligence analysts and policymakers need to be able to use, and fully appreciate the significance of, words related to Islam—starting with the word “Islam” itself, i.e., submission to a worldview based on Sharia, a code of law antithetical to Western common law.

It means the U.S. military needs to begin expounding and studying Islamic war doctrine—without fear of reprisal, such as when counter-terrorism strategist Stephen Coughlin was fired by the Pentagon for focusing on Islamic doctrine and therefore being politically incorrect.

(Alan note: another example of Obama using Federal powers to stifle any words let alone action that may serve to condemn the Islamic system - it's not a religion - and chill anyone who opposes it).

In short, it means America’s leadership needs to take that ancient dictum—“Know thy enemy”—seriously.

(Alan note: and realize that we have enemies within, like Obama himself and his radical appointees, including fervent Islamists in policy making positions in the Homeland Security and in other law enforcement organizations meant to prevent anti-American terrorism which terror supporting Islamists and their sharia OPENLY support).

About Me

For many years involved with intelligence and security matters in Iran with significant access at top levels during the rule of the Shah, until early 1979. Currently an Iran SME (subject matter expert), analyst/commentator, and multi-linguist.