This press release from Oregon Health and Science University caught my eye. Like most people, I’m in a perpetual battle with my waistline, so new clues as to how to win the war are always welcome! 3JUA7J4BWKFQ

The dietary concerns of too much fructose is well documented. High-fructose corn syrup has become the sweetener most commonly added to processed foods. Many dietary experts believe this increase directly correlates to the nation’s growing obesity epidemic. Now, new research at Oregon Health & Science University demonstrates that the brain – which serves as a master control for body weight – reacts differently to fructose compared with another common sweetener, glucose. The research is published in the online edition of the journal Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism and will appear in the March print edition.

“We know from animal models that the brain responds uniquely to different nutrients and that these responses can determine how much they eat,” said Jonathan Purnell, M.D., an associate professor of medicine (endocrinology, diabetes and clinical nutrition) in the OHSU School of Medicine.

“With newer technologies such as functional MRI, we can examine how brain activity in humans reacts when exposed to, say, carbohydrates or fats. What we’ve found in this case is that the brain’s response to fructose is very different to the response to glucose, which is less likely to promote weight gain.”

Functional MRI allows researchers to watch brain activity in real time. To conduct the research, nine normal-weight human study subjects were imaged as they received an infusion of fructose, glucose or a saline solution. When the resulting brain scans from these three groups were compared, the scientists observed distinct differences.

Brain activity in the hypothalamus, one brain area involved in regulating food intake, was not affected by either fructose or glucose. However, activity in the cortical brain control areas showed the opposite response during infusions of the sugars. Activity in these areas was inhibited when fructose was given but activated during glucose infusion.

This is an important finding because these control brain areas included sites that are thought to be important in determining how we respond to food taste, smells, and pictures, which the American public is bombarded with daily.

“This study provides evidence in humans that fructose and glucose elicits opposite responses in the brain. It supports the animal research that shows similar findings and links fructose with obesity,” added Purnell.

“For consumers, our findings support current recommendations that people be conscious of sweeteners added to their drinks and meals and not overindulge on high-fructose, processed foods.”

The effect this research describes is to do with feelings of satiation. It takes a larger amount of fructose for your body to decide it has had enough than it would if you were consuming glucose. This is important research because fructose has replaced other ingredients in a wide range of foods, particularly in the US. The reduction of satiation would lead, generally, to increased consumption, and we all know where that ends up!

It’s worth mentioning that the popular food ingredient, high fructose corn syrup, is actually a blend of glucose and fructose, rather than being pure fructose. It’s still pretty nasty stuff though, and has been linked to liver disease and gout, amongst other complaints.

While fructose is present in many natural foods, most notably fruit and honey, we should not let these findings put us off from eating such otherwise beneficial foods. It is the massive amounts of fructose that is added to processed food that is really the problem. Just knowing that fructose can “trick” us into eating more than we really need can help us to make sensible decisions on when to stop eating.

Thanks for every other informative blog.
Where else could I am getting that type of information written in such an ideal approach?
I’ve a challenge that I’m just now operating on, and I’ve been on the
look out for such info.