House Passes D.C. Voucher Bill 203-202; Veto Threatened

By a razor-thin margin, the House late last week passed a
controversial measure that would grant vouchers to needy Washington
students seeking to attend private schools.

By a 203-202 vote--with Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., casting a rare
tie-breaking vote--the House approved an amended District of Columbia
appropriations bill that includes a $7 million plan for vouchers. The
vote was split mainly along party lines, with a few Republicans
crossing over to join Democrats in voting against the bill.

President Clinton had already criticized the voucher proposal, which
is not included in the companion bill in the Senate. The Senate has yet
to vote on a final spending bill for Washington.

The Office of Management and Budget released a statement saying the
House bill would "set a dangerous precedent." OMB officials said they
would advise the president to veto any bill that included the
vouchers.

The provision in hr 2607 would provide scholarships of up to $3,200
each to help about 2,000 needy students attend private or parochial
schools of their choice.

"What this vote is about is whether or not 2,000 children have a
chance to go to college or go to jail," said Speaker Gingrich, a chief
sponsor.

But the move encountered strong resistance from Delegate Eleanor
Holmes Norton, D-D.C., who said federal lawmakers had no right to
impose vouchers on the city.

"The district's public schools desperately need every cent of
money," she said. "Every child in the district would have a place in
after-school programs with the $7 million that would go to private and
religious schools." Ms. Norton was among a group of House Democrats who
led a march in Washington last Thursday to protest the voucher
provision.

Competing Agendas

The voucher vote capped a week filled with partisan jabs and policy
disagreements between House Republicans and Democrats.

Leaders of both parties held media events to sound off on their
education priorities. Each side pushed initiatives that showed little
bipartisan agreement.

A literacy program that emphasizes teacher training and
tutorial-assistance grants, charter schools, and other school choice
efforts will be Republican priorities in the House in the coming weeks,
GOP leaders announced.

The Republican members plan an "education blitz" on the House floor
next week, where they hope to bring several pieces of education-related
legislation up for debate. Those pieces include changes to the charter
school law and a new tax-free "education savings account" plan, by
which parents could save up to $2,500 annually for an array of
education expenses, including private school tuition and home
schooling. Bills that would authorize both such proposals passed House
committees late last week.

At a news conference, Republican leaders packaged their initiatives
into "assignments" for the next few weeks. While they did not mention a
controversial block grant proposal that is helping tie up debate in a
House-Senate appropriations conference committee, they emphasized their
desire to pass a nonbinding resolution that would call for channeling
90 percent of federal K-12 funding to local schools.

With Congress scheduled to recess in early November, it was an
unusual week to introduce new initiatives.

Nevertheless, Democrats responded with their own agenda last week,
restating many of the proposals they introduced earlier this year: $5
billion for school construction interest subsidies, support for local
efforts to restructure troubled public schools, and expansion of Head
Start and other early-childhood programs.

Democratic leaders also want initiatives to reduce class sizes, wire
classrooms to the Internet, and offer incentives for qualified teachers
to teach in high-need areas. Democrats also urged school choice, but
only among public schools. They blasted the GOP voucher plan for
Washington. Rep. William L. Clay, D-Mo., charged that the "Republican
agenda that plays politics with our public schools."

But members of the House Education and the Workforce Committee came
together to approve language that would change the main federal charter
school law.

The measure, passed 24-8, would increase the federal funding
available for charter schools to $100 million in fiscal 1998--up from
its fiscal 1997 appropriation of $15 million--and target that money to
states that give the most flexibility to charter schools.

While many members on both sides of the committee hearing room sang
the praises of charters, some Democrats were more cautious about
putting too much faith into just one type of reform.

Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., who said he worried that federal funds
could be misused if charters were not under enough supervision.

The House Democrats have spent several months compiling what they
consider their best education proposals into their package, which they
will push next year, said Mark Zuckerman, a spokesman for the Democrats
on the Education and the Workforce Committee. "These are things that in
the second session [starting in January] will be front and center," he
said. "We wanted to start talking about them now."

Lawmakers have been so tied up with other education matters, such as
the debate over President Clinton's national testing proposal, that the
Republicans are only now beginning to have time to promote their new
initiatives, said Jay Diskey, a spokesman for Republicans on the House
education panel.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.