Telling it short, this value limits the amount of simultaneously opened files for multipart requests. To understand better what is multipart, you can see this question. The reason for this limitation is an ability to better adjust your app for your server. If you have too many files opened at...

collection_select internally relies on options_from_collection_for_select helper. Rather than using the collection_select directly, you can use select and pass the result of a options_from_collection_for_select call. The reason you may want to call options_from_collection_for_select directly, is because this method also accepts an optional selected parameter that could be used to pass a...

You can use this regex to test. It will ensure that after the @ there is .xx. but may also match the string @.xx.* .*@[^.]*[.]xx[.] Or this one to ensure that there is at least one character before and after the @. [email protected][^.]+[.]xx[.] ...

If you express the relation properly, ActiveRecord will do it for you class Tweet belongs_to :original_tweet, class_name: Tweet has_many :retweets, class_name: Tweet, dependent: :destroy, inverse_of :original_tweet end Tweet.last.destroy # will now destroy dependents ...

So, the complex part of your situation is that you have one thing (Surgery) that can be of many different types, and the different types have different fields. There are a number of different approaches to this problem, and I don't believe there's wide consensus on the 'best way'. The...

Use \d+ to match one or more digits. \b(?:http:\/\/)?(?:www\.)?example\.com\/g\/(\d+)\/\w put http:// and www. inside a capturing or non-caturing group and then make it as optional by adding ? quantifier next to that group. For both http and https, it would be (?:https?:\/\/)? DEMO...

Updated: This will check for the existence of a sentence followed by special characters. It returns false if there are no special characters, and your original sentence is in capture group 1. Updated Regex101 Example r"(.*[\w])([^\w]+)" Alternatively (without a second capture group): Regex101 Example - no second capture group r"(.*[\w])(?:[^\w]+)"...

In order to match the string with a literal backlash, you need to double-escape it in a raw string, e.g.: re.search(r'@CAD_DTA\\">(.+?)@[email protected]@CAD_LBL',result.text) ^ ^ In order to get the index of the found match, you can use start([group]) of re.MatchObject IDEONE demo: import re obj = re.search(r'@CAD_DTA\\">(.+?)@[email protected]@CAD_LBL', 'Some text [email protected]_DTA\\">I WANT...

A variant of n-dru pattern since you don't need to describe all the string: SELECT '#hellowomanclothing' REGEXP '(^#.|[^o]|[^w]o)man'; Note: if a tag contains 'man' and 'woman' this pattern will return 1. If you don't want that Gordon Linoff solution is what you are looking for....

dup does not create a deep copy, it copies only the outermost object. From that docs: Produces a shallow copy of obj—the instance variables of obj are copied, but not the objects they reference. dup copies the tainted state of obj. If you are not sure how deep your object...

@user.keys.each do |key| username == key.api_id && password == key.api_key end This piece of code returns a value of .each, which is the collection it's called on (@user.keys in this case). As it is a truthy value, the check will pass always, regardless of what are the results of evaluating...

This is one way to do it, using preg_match: $string ="SomeStringExample"; preg_match('/^[b-df-hj-np-tv-z]*/i', $string, $matches); $count = strlen($matches[0]); The regular expression matches zero or more (*) case-insensitive (/i) consonants [b-df-hj-np-tv-z] at the beginning (^) of the string and stores the matched content in the $matches array. Then it's just a matter...

It's not "through Hash", it's "array access" operator. To implement it, you need to define methods: def [](*keys) # Define here end def []=(*keys, value) # Define here end Of course, if you won't be using multiple keys to access an element, you're fine with using just key instead of...

Short answer: no, you cant. 2.1.5 :001 > 0001 => 1 0001 doesn't make sense at all as Integer. In the Integer world, 0001 is exactly as 1. Moreover, the number of leading integer is generally irrelevant, unless you need to pad some integer for displaying, but in this case...

A work-around for the lack of variable-length lookbehind is available in situations when your strings have a relatively small fixed upper limit on their length. For example, if you know that strings are at most 100 characters long, you could use {0,100} in place of * or {1,100} in place...

I don't understand why it would give me two hellos back? Because the first entry in the array is the overall match for the expression, which is then followed by the content of any capture groups the expression defines. Since the expression defines one capture group, you get back...

You should pass actions to the included block and perform_search_on to the class_methods block. module Searchable extend ActiveSupport::Concern class_methods do def perform_search_on(klass, associations = {}) ............. end end included do def filter respond_to do |format| format.json { render 'api/search/filters.json' } end end end end When your Searchable module include a...

That log excert is from a one off dyno, a la heroku run console - this is entirely seperate to your web dynos which you may be runnning 2x dyno's for. You need to specifiy --size=2x in your heroku run command to have the one off process use 2x dynos.

To only allow digits, comma and spaces, you need to remove (, ) and -. Here is a way to do it with Matcher.find(): Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("^[0-9, ]+$"); ... if (!m.find()) { evt.consume(); } And to allow an empty string, replace + with *: Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("^[0-9, ]*$");...

What you are doing will access the fourth character of String s. Split the string to an array and then access the fourth element as follows. puts s.split[3] Note: Calling split without parameters separates the string by whitespace. Edit: Fixing indexes. The index starts from 0. That means s.split[3] will...

Normally we'd use a loop do with a guard clause: x = 1 loop do break if x >= y x += 1 ... end Make sure y is larger than x or it'll never do anything. y can change if necessary and as long as it's greater than x...

The Page-Object gem's attribute method does not do any formatting of the attribute value. It simply returns what is returned from Selenium-WebDriver (or Watir-Webdriver). In the case of boolean attributes, this means that true or false will be returned. From the Selenium-WebDriver#attribute documentation: The following are deemed to be “boolean”...

The quotes are an issue but not the issue you are running into when you escape them. Your delimiter is terminating your regex just before the closing a which is giving you the unknown modifier error. It appears you don't have error reporting on though so you aren't seeing that....