"It
is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful
to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in
disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what one
does not believe.

It
is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express
it, that mental lying has produced in society. When man has so far
corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind, as to subscribe
his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared
himself for the commission of every other crime."
-Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason

All
the jabbering about Cruz and Rubio, what their polling numbers are and
their positions on the issues is worthless hot air. Neither one of them
are constitutionally eligible to run for president. The most common
lie I read from articles on the Internet from ABC.com to FOX and countless
web sites from "experts" is that only one parent must be a
U.S. citizen at the time of the child's birth to qualify as a natural
born citizen. That is not true and in Rubio's case, both of his parents
were foreign nationals when he was born. Rubio's parents did not become
U.S. citizens until he was four years old making him absolutely ineligible.

Any
mention of Cruz's eligibility is treated like a joke on some comedy
show. Conspicuously absent is any mention of Rubio in the same vein.
The reason why is quite obvious: Marco Rubio is the establishment's
back up plan to loser Jeb! Rubio will betray this country with amnesty.
The corrupt media apparatus in this country from FOX to CBS to the NY
Times continue to prop up the lie that only one parent need be a U.S.
citizen. Donald Trump has brought up Cruz's ineligibility while wasting
his time and energy going up against two candidates, Cruz and Rubio,
who have no legal right to even be in the race.

Trump
has vocally stated if Cruz gets the nomination the Democratic/Communist
Party USA will sue over Cruz's eligibility. I am one who thinks that
probably won't happen. To do so would open the flood gates in proving
the criminal impostor in the White House usurped the office of president.

Years
ago under the state open records law in Illinois I requested a copy
of Barry Obama's candidate submission for state senator. Barry Obama
filled out a form with absolutely nothing to verify his eligibility
and was simply declared eligible. Incredible! The same damn thing is
happening all over again with Cruz and Rubio and it has to stop.

"The
Illinois Board of Elections recently found that Presidential contender,
Senator Ted Cruz, is an Article II “natural born citizen.”
Lawrence Joyce and William Graham objected to Cruz being placed on the
presidential primary ballot in Illinois, contending that he is not an
Article II natural born citizen.

"The
Board rejected the challenge and found that Cruz “is a natural
born citizen by virtue of being born in Canada to his mother who was
a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth." The Board so found because
it said he "did not have to take any steps or go through a naturalization
process at some point after birth." The Board also had the audacity
to cavalierly state: “Further discussion on this issue is unnecessary."

"The
Board erred. The Board's ruling is an expression of Congressional Research
Service attorney Jack Maskell’s baseless thesis of his definition
of a natural born citizen. Not only is Maskell’s definition a
fabricated and revisionist definition of a natural born citizen, it
also is nonsensical. See Mario Apuzzo, The Fallacies of Congressional
Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural
Born Citizen....

"For
those born after the adoption of the Constitution, if one is a “citizen”
of the United States but not also a “natural born citizen”
of the United States, then one is prohibited from being President. The
Twelfth Amendment requires that also the Vice-President be a natural
born citizen.

"As
we can plainly see from the text of Article II, today, if one wants
to be President, one must demonstrate that one is a “natural born
citizen” of the United States, not just a “citizen”
of the United States. The text also does not say “citizen”
of the United States at birth. As I will demonstrate, there is a critical
constitutional difference between these two types of U.S. citizenships
and that only a natural born citizen of the United States is eligible
to be President. I will show that Ted Cruz might be a citizen of the
United States at birth.

"But
having acquired that at birth status by naturalization and not by birth
alone, he is not nor can he be a natural born citizen. That Cruz did
not have to go through any naturalization process after his birth, assuming
that to be true, does not nor can it erase the fact that he was by law
naturalized at birth by Congress through its naturalization Act applicable
to Cruz when he was born in 1970. Needing Congress to naturalize him
at birth, Cruz is not nor can he be an Article II natural born citizen."

I
encourage reading that entire legal analysis because the internal links
are very important. I fully understand those who support either Cruz
or Rubio and want him to be constitutionally eligible being disappointed.
Believe me, a few weeks ago I had a few bad moments when the issue of
Donald Trump's mother came up; she was born in Scotland. But, Trump's
mother became a U.S. citizen several years before he was born. Since
BOTH of Donald Trump's parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his
birth, he is constitutionally eligible.

What
can Donald Trump do? If it were me I would retain Dr. Edwin
Vieira (if he agrees) as a legal consultant. There have been
commentaries about the danger of this issue going before the rotten,
corrupt U.S. Supreme Court. Edwin has been there: "In the Supreme
Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases
leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education,
Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America
v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations
on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public
sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition
of their employment. "

I
have known Dr. Edwin Vieira since 1993. In the hundreds and hundreds
of hours of conversations over the years, I am always blown away when
he explains something to me the average person would not have thought
of relating to the subject at hand. His mind is a machine and there's
no doubt in my mind Edwin would come up with a battle plan to take on
this issue and win.

There's
also still the major issue of whether or not Cruz is even a naturalized
citizen:

"Unfortunately,
there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of
Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form (Consular Report of Birth Abroad)
with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted
Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and
not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom
of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship
documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status
of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records
for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to
allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian
agencies.

"As
a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims
that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized”
citizen of the United States." I think Donald Trump should ask
Cruz to produce a certified copy of the CRBA form, don't you? If Cruz
has nothing to hide, he'd do it in a NY minute.

During
one of the phony little voter meet up segments on Megyn Kelly's FOX
show one of the voters said no one cares about the eligibility issue.
Well, that low information voter is dead wrong. It matters to millions
of Americans and for Cruz and Rubio to continue in the primaries is
fraud. The RNC submitting paperwork to put his name on any ballot is
fraud. It sickens me to watch this play out again as it did in 2008
& 2012 with Barry Obama. We are either a nation of laws
or lies. We can't be both and be a great nation.

As
for Ted Cruz and the slick trick pulled against candidate Dr. Ben Carson
last week just as the Iowa Caucuses were about to get underway, it screams
how dishonest he is and how dirty he will play to win. Ted
Cruz Requests Private Meeting With Ben Carson - I'll just bet he
does. Ted Cruz's treatment of Carson might cost him votes in NH and
other states. I've written before I don't like or trust Ted Cruz. His
personal ambition oozes out of him and to me that makes him dangerous.

The
recent Iowa primary has been dissected every which way. The dangerous
Marxist propagandist, Bernie Sanders, believes vote fraud gave Hillary
the Hun a win by 4 votes.

The
Iowa Caucuses are, well, unusual. Instead of voting, a voter goes to
a location, individuals exchange dialogue over which candidate gets
their vote and then a vote is taken. In
this video you see children walking around at 9:45 PM and you'll
see just what a mess that system can be as far as accurately counting
votes. Hey, no need for a recount!

Of
course, using any type of electronic voting system is the sure
fire tool of tyrants to rig our elections:Microsoft
app used to tally votes at Iowa caucus fails in some areas. It's
been going on since the 1960s and still Americans tolerate the fraud
every two years both at the state and federal level for offices. I've
been writing about it since 1993. Vote fraud is what kept me from winning
the GOP primary in 1996. First of all, even though I was legally on
the ballot, my name was not on the ballot in the largest voting precinct
in Butte County. That's right. Come primary night and time to vote and
my name was not on the ballot. I had to write in my own name; who knows
if it even got counted.

Second,
from one of my recent columns:

"Every
GOP incumbent I can see is creaming legitimate challengers. Same thing
that happened to me in 1996 even though I was only 7% behind the incumbent
right up to "election" night with all it's fraud in my race.
At one minute after the polls closed, Peter Jennings (deceased) called
all 52 house seats in California; none of the numbers changed when they
quit counting votes at 4:13 am - including my race. What a remarkable
feat.

"Incumbents
in most districts are so far ahead - by 40% to a challenger, it's not
likely it will turn around. Gee, isn't it strange the old 81% to 18%
for an incumbent popped up? I voted for Shannon Thomason to replace
the state rep shoved down our throats because of redistricting; he's
a real dog, Rep. Darby. I know Shannon from local community meetings.
He's allegedly losing 81 to 18.

"From
my Blind Loyalty booklet of nothing but vote fraud, check these winners/losers
that night (primary March 26, 1996): 85-15, 81-18, 85-15, 81-18, 85-15,
86-14, 87-13, 81-18 and 81-14 which was my race. Those were the results
for incumbents vs challengers for the U.S. House throughout the state.
Every incumbent voted for NAFTA; all challengers including me
were opposed. Wonder why we allegedly lost? Those house seats
were scattered all over the state of California. Unless you're specifically
looking at a particular race, in a state the size of California or Texas,
people don't put together the pattern, but it sure as hell is there
and I'm looking at it tonight."

In
one of the precincts in my race the ballots were spread all over a table
in violation of state elections laws. Neither that nor the fact my name
was not on the ballot on primary night bothered the Republican Secretary
of State who did nothing. In his letter to me: If you don't like the
outcome of the election, file a lawsuit. And, pray tell where would
I get $20-$30 grand to sue the state? March 1996. That's when I left
the Republican Party and remain no party to this day.

"I
remember how six years ago a tea party star and a great patriot
of this nation, Sharon Angle, ran for senate in Nevada against
the ruling establishment uber-puppet, Harry Reid. I volunteered
at her office in Las Vegas. Till the election day Sharon led
by 4-5% according to all the polls. I remember one of her campaign
managers told me: we have to lead by over 10% as they can rig
about 10% of the vote. I knew it was possible but didn't want
to believe it.

"Well,
in the morning the vote count was 4-5% for Sharon, in the evening it
was announced that the vote flipped, 5% for the regime puppet, Harry
Reid. I urged Sharon to verify the vote, unfortunately, she never did
it.

"It
is interesting that until Bush-Gore 2000 the media conducted exit polling.
After 2000 the exit polling stopped. What people do not understand,
is that we have no vote verification. We have two types of ballot counting
scanners, Diebold and Sequoia, which can be programmed to rig the count
any way you want.

"Going
into Iowa primary Trump led by an average of 6% according to multiple
polls. Both Real Clear Politics and Huffington Post posted about the
same average, Trump had 31%, Cruz 25% and Rubio 14%. As the results
were announced, Cruz had 28%, Trump 24% and Rubio 23%. The swing that
we saw is just impossible. There is no way Rubio jumped 9% within hours.
Rubio did poorly in the evangelical state of Iowa for the whole year.
His sudden rise by 9% in one day smells heavy rigging of the vote to
me.

"Additional
indication of the heavy rigging, is the fact that there was a very heavy
attendance. 180,000 showed up to vote. Previous record was about 130,000.
Most analysts believed that a heavy turnout will benefit Trump as he
had the biggest crowds of supporters, new voters. Every analyst believed
that the heavy vote will mean Trump election by a landslide. There is
no way the vote went up by 50% to benefit establishment puppets, particularly
Rubio who was heavily disliked in Iowa."

It's
called vote flipping. Also from my Blind Loyalty booklet: "In the
Rogan Race 10:36 pm, Rogan was ahead of the Democrat 53% to 44%. At
6:28 am on November 8th, the Democrat allegedly moved ahead 53% to 44%.
Congressman Rogan, one of the 13 House Managers in the phony Clinton
impeachment, allegedly lost his race: 44% to Schiff's 53%. I don't believe
it for a moment. The numbers are too obvious, at least to me: Rogan
leads with 53% to 44% and loses by 44% to 53%. Flip flop! "

"Two
weeks ago, Ohio "relaxed" its voter registration requirements
to allow individuals to simply sign up and vote on the spot. For weeks,
advocacy groups have been "assisting" non-English speaking
minorities on how to vote. Most likely a large number of them are illegal
aliens because we know illegals are voting in huge numbers thanks to
the insidious Motor Voter Law of 1993.

"Citizenship
is a five year process. If you can't speak English by then, how committed
are you to your new country and how our government operates? I guess
it doesn't matter if you have someone instructing you on which box to
punch on a card inside the voting booth. BEFORE my grandparents got
on the boat from Sicily, they had to take an English proficiency test
(reading and writing) and have a valid health certificate. The same
applied to my other grand parents when they left Munich. We know what's
going on here and it's hijacking our elections.

"Even
with paper ballots in many states, between dirty voting rolls that are
supposed to be purged and cleaned, and multiple voting by one person
thanks to registration fraud, there's no way to get an accurate count
on election night. The switch to scanners over electronic voting machines
is simply switching the deck chairs on the Titanic. 31 states - with
big 'swing' states included - still use electronic machines and/or scanners.
Ripe for fraud. In smaller states with small precincts, it's harder
to hide the vote fraud. In major metropolitan cities, it's as easy as
walking across your living room.

"By
Oct. 30, 2008, more than 17 million people voted; no telling how many
are multiple votes. Last week, the city fathers in DC announced they
have no idea how many absentee ballots were mailed out! In Madison County,
Mississippi, they have over 123% more registered voters than people
over the age of 18. Is anyone outraged yet? This has been going on for
election after election after election for decades. Contrary to the
propaganda being pitched, most of these machines do NOT have a real
paper trail. See Oct. 31, 2008, transcript from Lou Dobbs - close to
half way down. The lawsuits are coming. The insidious Motor Voter Law
of 1993 added gasoline to the bonfire and Secretary's of State across
the Union have allowed the situation to simply snow ball from one rip
off election to the next. "

"November
7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats
demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed. Well, now
we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain
key states so that Obama could be reelected.

"Curiously,
Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced
before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with
no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota
(10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New
Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of
66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral
votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes
to win even without Ohio or Florida

"Romney
also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which
don't require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library
card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn't require
it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien
Haitian doesn't have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?"

The
primaries in this country have become a farce. Eligibility of candidates
is brushed off like lint as if it's of no importance. Fraud was committed
by the DNC and Nancy Pelosi to get Barry Obama on the ballot and now
the GOP is doing the same damn thing by allowing Cruz and Rubio to appear
on any state ballot. Regardless of who you support, if we don't have
honesty and integrity in our election process we may as well change
America to Venezuela.

Please,
click on "Mass E-mailing" below and send this article to all
your friends.

Please,
click on "Mass E-mailing" below and send this article to all
your friends.

[Just
a short note about 9/11 and Smart Electric Meeters.
The cost of America's undeclared "war" (invasion) in Afghanistan
has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on
us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column
know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military
grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested
from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released:
The
Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation,
but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or
give a copy as a present. I've purchased half a dozen copies and given
them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It's very powerful simply
because it's one 'ordinary' man's story who ask a simple question that
led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in
this film that many have never heard about but everyone should.
Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend.
Also, must
see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take
Back Your Power.]