“Take Shelly Yacimovich’s plan, put
it in place, and the Israeli economy will look like Spain’s and even worse,”
Steinitz said in an interview with The Jerusalem Post.

“Those naive
suggestions will ruin the Israeli economy.”

Steinitz specifically rapped
the Labor leader for proposing an increase in the corporate tax rate to 30
percent. He said that if multinationals like Intel and Teva are stripped of
incentives that see them pay taxes as low as 6%-12% on business activities in
the country’s periphery, they will stop investing and “some of them will even
leave the country in two to three years.” The current corporate tax rate is 25%,
but some multinationals get tax breaks for establishing centers in the
periphery.

Steinitz criticized Yacimovich for proposing expenditures of
around NIS 140 billion, adding that he could not recall any Israeli leader
making such extravagant commitments prior to an election.

Labor’s
socioeconomic team responded to Steinitz’s criticism, saying that if his and
Netanyahu’s economic policies continue after the January election, Israel will
be a “social hell.”

“It’s amazing to see how stressed the prime minister
and finance minister are from their inability to give real answers to the
questions that bother Israeli citizens, so they increase their attacks on the
only responsible plan that has been publicized and is supported by many
economists,” Labor stated, referring to the party's platform.

Labor added that the Netanyahu government was
economically irresponsible, harmed the poor, ushered in an unprecedented deficit
and led the middle class to fall apart.

Steinitz acknowledged that the
next government would need to cut around NIS 14b. from the 2013 budget, but
refused to detail where the cuts would be made, except to say that there are
“several possible alternatives.” He said he preferred not to go into details
now, as the nature of the spending cuts would be “up to the new government to
decide.”

“I can only say that there were similar cases in the past
decade, and at the end of the day we found the right way how to make those
cuts,” the finance minister said.

He repeated comments made last week
that it is unlikely a Likud-led government would impose fresh tax hikes next
year, although he did not rule out implementing tax increases depending on how
economic forecasts play out.

“As it seems, we will not have to impose tax
hikes, and if we do need to, it will be minimal,” he said.

“But... we
will have to wait and see what developments there are, what revenues we collect
from trapped profits.”

Playing down the impact of his decision to raise
the value-added tax to 17%, Steinitz noted the rate fell in the normal
historical range of Israel’s VAT, and took another swipe at Yacimovich for
claiming she could decrease the tax while ratcheting up
expenditures.

Although he focused most of his energies on Labor, he also
criticized other political rivals such as Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid, Interior
Minister Eli Yishai of Shas, Bayit Yehudi leader Naftali Bennett and Tzipi
Livni, head of The Tzipi Livni Party, for failing to acknowledge the importance
of economic growth in social welfare.

“They’re talking about how to share
the cake, but first you have to bake the cake,” he said.

Steinitz would
not comment on whether he would keep his role as finance minister in the event
that Likud Beytenu heads the next government, saying only that he would leave it
up to the party leader, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, to decide.

He
did promise, however, that the government would ensure safe passage of a bill on
economic concentration if his party wins reelection.

Earlier this month,
the government decided to postpone the second and third readings of the bill
until after the election.

If passed, the law would enforce separation of
financial and nonfinancial holdings by prohibiting control of financial
institutions by large non-financial corporations. A large financial corporation
is defined as one with at least NIS 40b. in assets under management and at least
NIS 6b. in Israeli sales.

Steinitz pointed to this bill as evidence of
the Netanyahu government’s efforts to protect ordinary Israelis, saying it
proves Yacimovich wrong when she claims that Netanyahu is good for the rich and
she is good for the people.

“Ask [Delek Group owner Yitzhak] Tshuva and
[Israel Corp. chairman Idan] Ofer if this government was so good for
them,” he said. “This government, unlike many previous Labor governments, was
good for the people, and not for the interests of big
companies.”

Steinitz emphasized the government’s economic
accomplishments, stressing that at a time of global financial upheaval, Israel’s
growth rate and moderate unemployment rate were particularly notable.

He
acknowledged, however, that problems remain, particularly in closing economic
gaps and lowering the price of housing. Filling the deficit of apartments would
require vigorous building around the country, including the West Bank, he
said.

“It is totally inconceivable that there will be another
[settlement] freeze,” he said.