According to the UN Refugee Agency’s global trends report, by the end of 2017, 68.5 million people had been driven from their homes across the globe due to conflict, persecution, violence, environmental disasters and human rights violations.

While Ms Coates-Hutchinson said the ration challenge was tough, she realised how fortunate she was to live in a society where she had easy access to basic resources and a variety of food.

“I realised how much joy I have when food is a part of my life and, when it is taken away, I was forced to realise that many refugees are only eating to survive,” Ms Coates-Hutchinson said.

She raised more than $800 and was surprised by the support she received.

“I would definitely do it again and encourage anyone else to do it too,” she said.

“Even if you don’t raise any money, it is powerful to be able to experience living on the same rations as a refugee, and create awareness about the issue.”

Despite the growing popularity of the Ration Challenge, not everyone supports the approach.

Community lawyer, advocate and refugee, Fadak Alfayadh, is the head of ‘Meet Fadak’, Australia's first refugee-led campaign for a higher annual refugee intake by Australia.

Ms Alfayadh took to Facebook to write that the challenge contributed to a harmful narrative, misrepresenting refugees.

“[Participants] are inadvertently saying that all refugees need is food and then all will be well. The reality is far from this,” her post read.

She suggested alternative ways of helping refugees, such as by volunteering at legal and medical clinics, or by providing English language support.

“People should donate in a way that is respectful towards those seeking asylum,” Ms Alfayadh wrote.