Stuff from Voat and /pol/ do eventually reach the general public like South African white genocide and Google search bias. That's two back to back wins and it would have continued to be ignored by the media had Trump not tweeted about.

It's refreshing to finally feel like we are getting some real representation from the government on issues important to us.

lol dont be a retard, i doubt trump has ever been on voat, and probably not 8ch, maybe 4chan tho....he found out about the south african white genocide from tucker carlson, who has a whole team of young interns who browse the internet for him bringing stories from 8ch, voat and 4ch

I'd believe someone in trump administration is lurking or posting here on voat and the chans. They can't be so ignorant that they don't know what these sites are. I found them pretty easily so i'd think the people working for government intelligence would find them. Theoretically these sites would be the best way for them to reach there base.

If directors were allowed to deviate from shareholder wealth maximization, they would inevitably turn to indeterminate balancing standards, which provide no accountability. As a result, directors could be tempted to pursue their own self-interest.

NO LAW CHANGES NEEDED. There are past US supreme court rulings regarding trespassing political speech on a private property being allowed if the private property is a de facto monopoly of the target listeners ears.

Corporations are private, but they are also a privileged class of limited liability, granted by government, and as such they are held to a higher standard of behavior with privileges related to property also equally restricted by government. Property is a legal definition, and there is more than one kind, and it is also defined by government.

In law, government has complete authority and control over corporations - this is an undisputed legal fact - cemented in case histories through the Supreme Court. Trump can halt trading and seize the company any time he pleases with a single sentence from his pen.

There is no need to change any laws. The existing laws are very clear, and Google is deliberately breaking them. It's not like Google doesn't have lawyers. They know what the law says, and they know they are violating that law on purpose. It doesn't matter why. The government has full authority to do whatever it wants to in such cases.

I know you can save webpages to your harddrive, I used to save as .mht about 15 years back, so the page was self contained. (If I saved as other format, it would save page and accompanying files separately, and I could not open it locally)

Another, more rudimentary way is to create screenshots of pages, as you scroll or whatever, so you get the complete page. Then save locally and upload to free speech image host like imgoat.

I don't know the current methods for saving pages, nor the preferred format. I assume its not mht any more.

Like the original Social Security trust fund that was confiscated to pay for the Vietnam War in the 1960s. Today, SS is a ponzi scheme propped up by immediate taxation; we will never see a cent of our "contributions."

That's good, because that is the best archive of black on white crime there probably is. Thousands of cases a year, sometimes very brutal. 7-8 black on white murders per week FBI crime stats. And yet we hear nothing!