EPA Region 2 Releases Its Proposed Plan For The Superfund Clean-Up Of The Gowanus Canal

on
|

As planned, EPA Region 2 just released its proposed plan for the clean-up of the Gowanus Canal. This is great news for the Gowanus Community. Even better news still is that the proposed plan also includes "controls to prevent raw sewage overflows and other land-based sources of contamination from compromising the cleanup."It's a huge step, which brings us ever so closer to actually starting the actual clean-up of the polluted waterway. The fact that the proposed plan addresses the Combined Sewer Overflow is a major victory for neighborhood residents, who had advocated that the CSO issue be resolved.Below is the EPA press release:

EPA Proposes Plan for Cleaning Up Gowanus Canal

Multi-million Dollar Cleanup to Revitalize Polluted Brooklyn Waterway

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today announced a proposed cleanup plan for the Gowanus Canal that includes removing some of the contaminated sediment and capping dredged areas. The proposed plan also includes controls to prevent raw sewage overflows and other land-based sources of contamination from compromising the cleanup. The cost of the cleanup plan is expected to be between $467 and $504 million.The EPA will accept public comments on its proposed plan until March 28, 2013. The EPA will holdpublic meetings on January 23, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at Public School 58 (the Carroll School), 330 SmithStreet, Brooklyn and on January 24, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the Joseph Miccio Community Center, 110West 9th Street, Brooklyn to discuss the proposed plan and answer questions.“The proposed cleanup plan for the Gowanus Canal will make essential progress in removing toxiccontaminants from this heavily polluted and battered waterway,” said Judith A. Enck, EPA RegionalAdministrator. “Our overall goal is to reduce pollution and protect the health of people who live andwork in this community. The EPA encourages people to attend the January public meetings on theproposed plan and submit written comments no later than March 28.”More than a dozen contaminants, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals, including mercury, lead and copper, were found at high levels in the sediment in the Gowanus Canal. PAHs and heavy metals were also found in the canal water. PAHs are a group of chemicals that are formed during the incomplete burning of coal, oil, gas, wood, garbage or other organic substances. PCBs were used as coolants and lubricants in transformers, capacitors and other electrical equipment and their manufacture was banned in 1979. PCBs and PAHs are suspected to be cancer-causing and PCBs can have neurological effects as well. Consumption of fish from the canal continues to this day notwithstanding fish advisories.Completed in the mid-1800s, the Gowanus Canal was once a major industrial transportation route.Manufactured gas plants, paper mills, tanneries and chemical plants are among the many facilities thatoperated along the canal. As a result of years of discharges, stormwater runoff, raw sewage overflowsfrom sewer systems that carry sanitary waste from homes and rainwater from storm drains andindustrial pollutants, the Gowanus Canal has become one of the nation's most seriously contaminatedwater bodies. In 2010, the Gowanus Canal was added to the Superfund list of the nation’s mostcontaminated hazardous waste sites. The EPA has identified numerous parties that are potentiallyresponsible for the contamination including National Grid and the city of New York.The evaluation of the alternatives for cleaning up the Gowanus Canal was divided into three segmentsthat correspond to the upper, middle and lower portions of the canal. The first segment, which runsfrom the top of the canal to 3rd Street, and the 2nd segment, which runs from 3rd Street to just south ofthe Hamilton Avenue Bridge, contain the most heavily-contaminated sediment. In the third segment,which runs from the Hamilton Avenue Bridge to the mouth of the canal, the sediment is lesscontaminated than sediment in the other segments.For the first and second segments of the canal, the EPA is proposing to dredge approximately 307,000cubic yards of highly contaminated sediment. In some areas where the sediment is contaminated withliquid coal tar, the EPA is proposing to stabilize the sediment by mixing it with concrete or similarmaterials. The stabilized areas would then be covered with multiple layers of clean material, includingan “active” layer made of a specific type of clay that will remove PAH contamination that could well up from below, an “isolation” layer of sand and gravel that will ensure that the contaminants are notexposed, and an “armor” layer of heavier gravel and stone to prevent erosion of the underlying layersfrom boat traffic and currents. Finally, clean sand would be placed on top of the “armor” layer to restore the canal bottom as a habitat. The plan also calls for removing contaminated material placed in the 1st Street Turning Basin decades ago.For the third segment, the EPA is proposing to dredge 281,000 cubic yards of contaminated sedimentand cap the area with an armor layer and a layer of sand to help restore habitat.The proposed plan includes various methods for managing the contaminated sediment after dredging,depending on the levels of contamination. The proposed methods include transporting the dredgedsediment to an off-site permitted disposal facility, transporting it to a location where the sediment canbe treated and the possible beneficial reuse of some of the sediment after treatment.In addition, the proposed plan calls for additional controls to significantly reduce combined seweroverflows into the canal. The EPA is concerned that such overflows would contribute to therecontamination of the canal after its cleanup. The EPA is proposing that combined sewer overflowdischarges from two major outfalls in the upper portion of the canal be outfitted with controls to reducethe total volume of discharges from those outfalls by 58% to 74%.Contaminated land sites along the canal, including three former manufactured gas plants, are beingaddressed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Other potential sourcesof continuing contaminant discharges to the canal have been referred to the state of New York and willbe investigated and addressed as necessary.Written comments on the proposed plan should be addressed to: