On Wednesday 2013-02-20 20:29 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> And so if I have these two rules:
>
> a:link { color:red; }
> a:link:hover { color:blue; transition: color 2s ease; }
>
> then it will be no :hover -> :not(:hover) transition at all, correct?
Correct.
> But if {initial} -> :hover transition will be canceled before its end
> (so :hover -> :not(:hover) switch in 2 seconds) then we will actually
> see backward transition. Is this correct/desirable?
In my opinion, no, which is why I object to the current rules of
reversing of transitions.
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂