February 27, 2014

February 27, 2014

June 18, 2014

A Center for Public Integrity analysis of dozens of Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission documents found three social welfare nonprofits that spent money on politics and did not report their activity to the Internal Revenue Service, as required.

“That’s called playing with fire,” Marcus Owens, a former chief of the IRS’s nonprofits division, said about groups that neglect to report political expenses.

Colorado Family Action reported no political activity on its 2012 tax return but the social welfare nonprofit reported $78,058 worth of expenses to fight President Barack Obama’s re-election, according to FEC records.

Jessica Haverkate, Colorado Family Action’s executive director, told the Center for Public Integrity in an email that the group plans to amend its tax return to “accurately state our primary exempt purpose,” reduce its stated revenue to remove an in-kind donation and report political expenses of $25,498.

Haverkate didn’t explain why the political expenses were lower than what was reported to the FEC.

Family Foundation Action claimed no political campaign activity on its 2012 tax return but spent $18,942 last year attempting to oust Obama, according to FEC records. Family Foundation Action officials did not return calls and emails.

Public Interest Forum said it isn’t political on its 2012 tax return. But it spent $4,038 opposing Obama in 2012, FEC records show. Public Interest Forum officials did not return calls and emails.

Meanwhile, one group — RightChange.com II — underreported its political spending, as first noted by ProPublica. Itreported $150,000 in political campaign activity during 2010 to account for a grant it gave of the same amount to its 527 committee, which is not limited in terms of how much it can spend on politics.

The money paid for an ad supporting Tim Burns, the Republican nominee in the special election that spring for the seat of longtime Democratic Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania who died in February 2010. Burns lost.

Representatives of RightChange.com II, including North Carolina state Sen. Fletcher Hartsell Jr., who was listed as the group’s secretary, did not return calls or emails.

Get our email newsletter

Sign up for the Center for Public Integrity's Watchdog email and get the news you want from the Center when you want it.

Email address

First name

Last name

ZIP code (U.S. only)

Country

Send me emails

DailyTwice a weekOnce a week

Include stories on these topics in my emails

Everything

All stories published by the Center.

ICIJ Updates

Hear about the latest cross-border investigations from the Center’s global network of journalists.

Money and Politics

News about ethics, campaign donations, lobbying and influence in government.

National Security

Examining the process of military budgeting as well as the soundness of specific military programs.

Financial Reform, Broadband Regulation and Corporate Accountability

The latest investigations about U.S. financial reform and the political power of the information technology industry.

Environment and Labor

Unraveling how environmental, health and safety rules take shape, how lax oversight allows problems to persist and how breakdowns in protections impact the public.

Juvenile Justice

Examining the burgeoning debate over proposed new approaches to handling young people at risk.

Health Care Oversight

Investigating the oversight of Medicare and the health care industry as a whole in America. Featuring a weekly column from former insurance executive turned whistleblower Wendell Potter.

Since the nonprofits’ political spending was reported as independent expenditures — money spent to expressly advocate for the election or defeat of a candidate — “it’s hard to imagine any way that they could claim those activities were not political campaign intervention reportable to the IRS,” said John Pomeranz, a nonprofit tax law expert and attorney with Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg.

The groups could get their tax-exempt status revoked, or worse, face criminal charges for reporting incorrect information to the IRS, said Owens, an attorney with Caplin & Drysdale. He added that intentionally filing false tax returns is a crime: “Since tax returns are filed under penalty of perjury, it raises an interesting question as to whether that’s a false return.”

Owens noted that the Department of Justice successfully prosecuted the leader of the Fiesta Bowl organization, a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit, a few years ago because it made political contributions that weren’t reported on its tax return.

“The issue of lying on your tax return is a problem in and of itself,” said Adam Rappaport, senior counsel with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. “The other question is, how is IRS supposed to enforce law [and determine the extent of a group’s political activity] if they don’t know how much was spent?”

This project seeks to ‘out’ shadowy political organizations that have flourished in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. We provide the narrative behind the flow of money and how professional politicking is influencing a flood of new spending. Read our primer on Citizens United and our Primary Source blog.