Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!

At the vigorous foreign affairs debate between the major Canadian national
party leaders at the Munk Centre Monday night, one subject was conspicuous by
its absence — Saudi Arabia.

A week earlier, during the French-language debate, when prodded by Bloc
Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe to explain why Canada was arming a country
that many political and military strategists consider our enemy, Prime
Minister Stephen Harper sheepishly claimed, "Saudi Arabia is our
ally."

That remark was met by a sarcastic rebuke from Duceppe, who shot back,
"So Saudi Arabia is your ally. Oh good, I've taken note."

Harper's explanation is cause for concern. He could have said, "in
trade sometimes one has to deal with the devil," or that, "we
traded with the USSR as well," but he stuck to his "ally"
rhetoric.

Defending Canada's $15 billion military deal with Saudi Arabia to supply
light armoured vehicles, Harper told reporters, "This is a deal,
frankly, with a country (that), notwithstanding its human rights violations,
which are significant ... is an ally in the fight against the Islamic
State."

Saudi Arabia is not our ally in the
fight against Islamic State.

In fact, Saudi Arabia is not our ally in the fight against Islamic State.

Indeed, it would not be an exaggeration to say, Saudi Arabia is,
metaphorically speaking, the ultimate "Islamic State."

As early as 2002, Laurent Murawiec, the late French-born geostrategist
with the Rand Corporation, warned an advisory committee to the United States
Department of Defence that the "Saudis are active at every level of the
terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot soldier, from
ideologist to cheerleader ... Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks
our allies."

Raif
Badawi

Murawiec resigned from his job at Rand shortly after. While he insisted at
the time he wasn't fired, many suspected the parting was an example of the
lobbying power of the Saudis in the George W. Bush administration, one that
continues with President Barack Obama today.

To my astonishment, neither Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau nor NDP Leader
Thomas Mulcair were willing to criticize the Saudi government or promise to
tear up the deal with the Saudis.

Perhaps they were not well briefed on the subject when it first came up, I
thought, so I waited for the Munk foreign affairs debate on Monday for the
subject to emerge.

It didn't. Neither the moderator nor the leaders themselves brought up the
subject of Saudi Arabia, the arms sale, the case of political prisoner Raif
Badawi, whose wife, Ensaf Haider, is now a resident in Canada, or anything
critical of the Saudi kingdom.

There is something clearly wrong when
no Canadian leader dares to censure Saudi Arabia.

Instead, we witnessed Trudeau mounting an unabashed defence of the rights
of convicted Islamic terrorists to hold on to their Canadian citizenship;
jihadis who share the same political worldview propagated by many in Saudi
Arabia. Trudeau's self-righteous rant seemed to suggest revoking Canadian
citizenship was a racist act against immigrants.

This prompted Harper to give the following retort:

Are you seriously saying, Mr. Trudeau, we
should never be able to revoke citizenship from somebody? We revoke the
citizenship already of war criminals, and why would we not revoke the
citizenship of people convicted of terrorist offences against this country?

There is something clearly wrong with Canadian politics when no leader
dares to censure Saudi Arabia, let alone call for sanctions against it.

Where are the Bernie Sanders and Donald Trumps of Canadian politics?

How long will we have to suffer the mediocrity in Canada of puppeteer
consultants, Teleprompters, contrived rage and fake self-righteousness?

Tarek Fatah, a founder of the Muslim
Canadian Congress and columnist at the Toronto Sun, is a Robert J. and Abby B. Levine
Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

As the election of 2048 approaches, the candidates from both
parties continue to exchange strong views on the issues that affect the lives
of Americans. The Party of Democracy and Justice (Hezb-Al-Dimukratie-Wa'al
Adalah) continues to maintain that the election will come down to social
justice issues.

“With 34 percent unemployment and the price of goat so far out
of range of most working families that they have been forced to switch to
chicken, it is time that our opponents stopped dodging the issues and took a
serious look at the economic consequences of their policies,” Bashar Mohammed
Hussein Al-Hamdani, said during a campaign stop at a HalalBurger in Peoria,
Illinois.

However the ruling Freedom and Religion Party (Hezb Al-Hurriyah
Wa'al Allah) denounced this as class warfare. Still preoccupied with the
ongoing occupation of the Netherlands and Greece, the party has taken
criticism for ignoring the economic problems of the United States while being
preoccupied with waging foreign wars in the name of Islam.

Nevertheless President Mohammed Al-Thani, fresh off a pilgrimage
from Mecca, vigorously defended his record while conducting a photo op at a
San Diego Madrassa. “The Freedom and Religion Party believes in creating
opportunities, rather than offering hand outs. Our subjugation of infidel
nations has opened up new territories to be dominated by the believers and
our vigorous drive for national morality has revived the family unit as an
economic force. Our program of heavily fining women who go out with their
naked hair exposed and raising the Jizya tax on the People of the Book has
also raised billions of dollars that will go toward repaying the nation 93
trillion dollar debt.”

The high Jizya tax has provoked outrage in some parts of the
United States, but the continuing decline of the nation’s non-Muslim
population has made the Christian vote much less of a factor in the election.
Hamdani has promised to cut the Jizya tax by 20 percent if elected, but it is
unclear whether conservative elements in his own party will allow him to do
it. National surveys show that since making the proposal, Hamdani’s ratings
have gone down 9 points in Illinois and 14 points in California.

President Al-Thani’s advisors view the 2 million conversions to
Islam since the Jizya tax was tripled as a major benefit to the party which
lost its Christian support during the Great Transition. Since then the
Freedom and Justice Party has picked up a Christian and Jewish bloc vote, but
the value of that bloc has not held up well over the last two elections.

Christian rights activists attribute the decline of American
Christians to the Jizya tax which has made it impossible for many Christian
families to earn a living. They also blame the bloody 2045 Riots which marked
the end of the Christian presence in former strongholds such as Nashville and
Cedar Rapids, as well as rumors about the kidnapping and forced conversion of
Christian girls.

However popular talk show host and pundit, Abdul Greene
countered that the decrease was best explained by the large scale immigration
of Christians out of the country. “The Christians are too bigoted to live in
the same country with us, just like their parents and grandparents. If they
can’t control the country, they refuse to live here and accept our laws.”

Christian rights activists have accused Greene of playing a
major role in stirring up the 2045 Riots which torched Christian areas in
major cities across the United States after a Christian man was accused of
having an intimate encounter with a Muslim woman. Greene however insists that
the Christians are the ones to blame. Greene's support of the Freedom and
Religion Party has been controversial, but President Al-Thani has refused to
disavow him.

The latest round of attacks by Greek guerrillas on liberation
forces in Athens led to smaller attacks on Christian businesses in New York,
Chicago and Los Angeles last month. They also accentuated the debate over the
continuing occupation of Greece which began in 2031 when the United States
government intervened to protect the territorial claims of the Turkish
Republic of Cyprus. Much as in the Netherlands, the intervention to protect a
Muslim community turned into a full blown occupation and a war against an
insurgency that is believed to be backed and supplied by rogue states such as
the breakaway Arctic Republic and the Zionist Entity.

The Freedom and Religion Party under President Al-Thani
continues to take the position that American prosperity is closely linked to
the welfare of the rest of the Muslim world. In the State of the Union
address the president stated that, "We cannot repeat the folly of the
Americans of the pagan period who believed that they could have material
wealth without religion. Our prosperity comes from Allah and it is only by
spreading the way of Allah and conducting our Jihad in the way of Allah on
behalf of our endangered brothers and sisters in Europe and Asia that we will
be deserving of Allah's bounty."

Hoping to exploit the widespread economic dissatisfaction,
Hamdani, a former Wisconsin governor, has promised to withdraw troops from
Greece within two years and the Netherlands within five years with the
majority of remaining liberation forces being drawn from other Muslim
countries. "We can best aid our fellow believers in the Muslim world by
being a model of stability and a beacon of tolerance."

Yusuf
Al-Amiriki, a member of Hamdini's foreign policy defense team and a first
generation convert descended from two American presidents, courted
controversy with a proposal to set up a coalition government of Muslim and
moderate Christian groups in the Netherlands. Such governments had been tried
in Europe before during the 2030's, but invariably fell apart. Leading
Senators from the Freedom and Justice Party accused Hamdani of selling out
Muslim interests in order to court the Christian vote. Hamdani's spokeswoman,
Aisha Zubedi, has refused to comment on the Amiriki proposal except to say
that Hamdani was open to any solution that would restore peace to the people
of the Netherlands and protect the rights of European Muslims.

Hamdani courted further controversy by appearing at the funeral of former
President Bob Thompson. Thompson had served two terms and while his
administration had worked hard on outreach to the Muslim world, he also
engaged in the targeted murder of Muslim religious leaders and provided aid
to the Zionist entity. For these reasons, President Al-Thani chose not to
appear at his funeral even though President Thompson had been a member of the
pre-transition Freedom and Religion Party, which was then known as the
Republican Party.

Despite the official disapproval, Thompson was viewed positively by many in
the Muslim community. Tens of millions of Pakistani-Americans remember how
after the India-Pakistan war, the Thompson Administration generously opened
its borders to victims of the nuclear fallout in Pakistan. Without that step
it might have taken decades more before America achieved a Muslim majority.

During the beginning of his second term, Thompson became the first president
to take the oath of office on both a Bible and a Koran declaring that he
wanted to make no separation between the books of god. At the Thompson
funeral, Hamdani appeared to promise that he would repeat that gesture, but
his spokeswoman quickly disavowed any notion that he would ever take an oath
on a text that was not the Koran.

"No American president has taken an oath on a bible in over a decade,
all that the governor meant was that he would keep both Christians and
Muslims in mind as the people of Allah when he takes his oath to protect and
defend the Sharia," Aisha Zubedi said.

While the Democracy and Justice Party has often appealed to the poor, its
missteps have raised concerns in traditional Muslim communities that Hamdani
is going too far in pandering to non-Muslims. "Next thing you know he'll
say we should let the Jews come back to America," Congressman Mohammed
Mogabe declared. "If Hamdani wants votes out of Cleveland then he is
going to show he will fight for us, not for the enemies of the
prophets."

Hamdani has hurriedly scheduled an upcoming visit to the Ground Zero Mosque,
but it may not be enough to improve his image in the eyes those who have
accused him of flirting with apostasy. While the Mosque is a traditional stop
for presidential candidates, Hamdani is unlikely to pay tribute to the souls
of the 19 martyrs as Al-Thani did during the previous election.

Hoping to refocus attention on his economic program, Hamdani called for
higher corporate taxes and accused some corporations of abusing Islamic
banking, in particular Hibah payments, to avoid paying taxes. Such charges
are not new, but particularly galling at a time when over half the country is
out of work and tycoons like Ahmed Shalafi and Sheikh Johnson have used their
connections with the Al-Thani government to become billionaires.

To counter Hamdani, Al-Thani's economic advisers have offered up a stimulus
plan that raises the Jizya tax on infidels for the second time in a year and
vowed to cut spending even further without affecting subsidies to Islamic
schools or military preparedness for the Global Jihad. Though the election is
still some time away, the Al-Thani campaign has also rolled out a series of
ads targeting poor communities which accuse Hamdani of plotting with Jewish
and Christian tycoons to subvert the Islamic system of finance through
freemasonry and Communist class warfare tactics.

Adding further drama to the election is the possibility of a
third party campaign. Andrew McMillan who has been running as an independent
in elections for almost twenty years without appealing to anyone but the same
racist groups who have been disavowed even by most Christians and Jews, but
there is talk that McMillan's America Party might consider replacing the
eccentric millionaire with sports star Ted March. As leading goalscorer who
helped the United States win the 2042 World Cup, March is one of the most admired
non-Muslims in the country. With him on the ticket, the America Party might
be able to adopt a new moderate image that is no longer associated with
bigotry and intolerance.

But frustrating his own party members, the septuagenarian McMillan appeared
to an event commemorating the 2045 riots and gave a rousing speech which hit
on many of the same old themes. "For thirty-six years I've been involved
in politics and the only thing that I can tell you about politics is that
it's all bunk. We weren't talking about the things that mattered thirty-six
years ago and we aren't talking about them now."

Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Ali Kazak knows
perfectly well that his narrative is deceitful in the extreme. Kazak's
fantasy about a Greater Israel is false, yet he does not mention a word
about the most popular slogan used by Palestinians and their supporters:
"Palestine will be free From the river to the Sea." All
Palestinian maps show this same thing: a Palestine stretching from the
River Jordan to the Mediterranean. The slogan and the maps show one
thing: no Israel. To call for the extinction of a people and country is
a threat of genocide, something the Jews of all people have never called
for and will never urge.

"The Jewish
settlement is not designed to undermine the position of the Arab
community; on the contrary, it will salvage it from its economic misery,
lift it from its social decline, and rescue it from physical and moral
degeneration. Our renaissance in Palestine will come through the
country's regeneration, that is: the renaissance of its Arab inhabitants."
– David Ben Gurion, 1906, later to become Prime Minister of Israel.

Why does Kazak not
address the genuine threats of extremist Muslim sheikhs and
organizations that say Islam will conquer the world, Muslims will
dominate, and the earth will become a single umma [community]?

In 1947, the United
Nations decided to partition the land. One slender part was given to the
Jews, who accepted the space allotted to them without grumbling, but the
Arabs rejected the arrangement, refused to establish a state of their
own, and have gone on since then fighting, turning down generous peace
offers, using terrorism on a vast scale, and doing all in their power to
destroy Israel. That is why they do not have a state today.

The
"occupation" of the West Bank and Gaza was not an occupation
of Palestinian territory. It simply retook these two areas from the
Jordanians and the Egyptians, who had been occupying them since 1948.
Today, Gaza has been wholly restored to the Palestinian people. The
Israeli administration of the West Bank is totally legal under
international law and is endorsed by UN Resolution 242 (1967), and which
makes it clear that Israel has to move out from only some of the
territory, and that only once the Palestinians have agreed to secure
final and secure borders for Israel and recognized the state of Israel
-- something they have never done. It is also legalized under the
Israel-Jordan peace treaty of 1987 and the 1993 and 1995 Oslo Accords.

Palestinian Authority leaders, official television,
schools and media outlets often display maps showing Palestine stretching
from the River Jordan to the Mediterranean. The maps do not show the
existence of Israel.

A revelation of Palestinian diplomatic tactics came to light recently in
the form of a diplomatic response to an article that opposed the formal
acceptance of a Palestinian state, at least at this time.

If one person can
stand at the UN and unilaterally declare a state, I advise the leader of
the Kurds, the Catalans, the Druze and any other ethnic groups that feel
entitled to have their independence to make their way to the building
and do so.

It is, therefore,
the European Union and several European governments, including France
and the Netherlands, that are complicit with the Palestinian Authority
(PA) in knowingly and purposefully violating their own, signed
agreements. Moreover, according to the Oslo Accords, the PA was
designated as an interim body, not a permanent one.

If one really wants
to help the Palestinians, one will try to help rid them of their corrupt
and repressive leaders; not reinforce them. The Palestinian people
deserve better than this.

Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas
addresses the United Nations General Assembly, on September 26, 2014.
(Image source: UN)

The "bombshell" that Palestinian Authority (PA) President
Mahmoud Abbas threatened he was going to drop on the United Nations during
his speech did not materialize.

This bombshell turned out to be a planned announcement of a Palestinian
state "under Israeli occupation."

If one person can stand at the podium of the UN and unilaterally declare
a state, then I advise the leader of the Kurds, the Catalans, the Druze and
any other ethnic groups that feel entitled to have their independence to make
their way to the building and do so.

Apparently the U.S. Administration advised Abbas against the
announcement, and Abbas backed down.

Reuters:
"Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei on Wednesday accused
Saudi Arabia of hampering the transfer of bodies of Iranian pilgrims
killed in a crush at haj last week, adding fuel to a growing spat over
the disaster in which nearly 800 people died. Iran has been the most
vocal in its criticism of Saudi Arabia for the disaster last Thursday,
in which at least 239 Iranians were killed. Tehran says 200 of its
pilgrims are still missing. Iranian officials say Saudi Arabia has not
done enough to identify and transfer the bodies of the victims to Iran.
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian said on
Wednesday that Iran will not allow a single Iranian to be buried in
Saudi Arabia. 'Saudi Arabia failed to help the injured and are causing
trouble in transfer of the bodies to Iran ... the slightest disrespect
to Iranians will be met with a harsh reaction from us,' Khamenei told
graduates of the Iranian Army's military academies in the city of
Noshahr. 'We have shown self-restraint so far, but the Saudis should
know Iran is more powerful and has more capabilities and they cannot
compete with us in any front,' he added." http://t.uani.com/1N177mu

AFP:
"The Saudi-led coalition said on Wednesday it had seized an
Iranian fishing boat in the Arabian Sea loaded with weapons destined
for Shiite rebels it is fighting in Yemen. A coalition statement said
that the vessel was intercepted on Saturday and that 14 Iranians and
weapons including anti-tank shells were found on board. It said that
papers found on board the boat showed that it was registered to an
Iranian and was licensed for fishing by the Iranian authorities. It
listed the weapons seized as 18 anti-armoured Concourse shells, 54
anti-tank BGM17 shells, 15 shell battery kits, four firing guidance
systems, five binocular batteries, three launchers, one launchers'
holder and three batteries. The vessel was seized 150 nautical miles
off the Omani port of Salalah, the coalition statement said." http://t.uani.com/1KRs0ut

Guardian:
"The Iranian government is earning more from tax than oil for the
first time in almost half a century as the country shifts its
traditional reliance on crude to taxation revenues in the face of
plummeting oil prices. President Hassan Rouhani's economic strategy is
to significantly reduce the government's dependency on oil and instead
collect tax more systematically, according to Ali Kardor, the deputy
managing director of the national Iranian oil company (NIOC). 'For the
first time in 50 years, the government's share of the oil revenue is
less than what it is earning from tax, including VAT,' he told the
Guardian on the sidelines of the second Europe-Iran forum in Geneva.
'Only around 10% of Iran's GDP is currently dependent on oil.' Almost
20% of oil income goes into a sovereign wealth fund, which is reserved
for development purposes." http://t.uani.com/1P5waUW

Nuclear Program
& Agreement

Fars (Iran):
"Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Ali
Shamkhani underlined the end of inspections and visits to the country's
military site in Parchin. 'No other visits will be paid to Parchin at
any level,' Shamkhani told FNA on Wednesday. Asked about
Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Yukiya Amano's visit to Parchin, he said, 'No inspection was carried
out and Amano's presence at Parchin was just visit different from
inspection.'" http://t.uani.com/1P5wSBy

Congressional
Action

Free Beacon:
"House Republicans are still considering a lawsuit and other
measures to prevent the implementation of the Iran nuclear deal and the
provision of billions of dollars in sanctions relief to Tehran,
according to one of the leading lawmakers opposed to the agreement.
Rep. Peter Roskam (R., Ill.) told the Washington Free Beacon in an
interview that the Obama administration still needs to address a
'serious legal question' about the nuclear deal and the Iran Nuclear
Agreement Review Act, which allowed Congress to evaluate the agreement
before it was fully implemented. According to the review act, lawmakers
were supposed to be granted access to the text of the agreement as well
as 'any additional materials related thereto, including annexes,
appendices, codicils, side agreements, implementing materials,
documents, and guidance, technical or other understandings, and any
related agreements.' However, Roskam and other lawmakers have said that
they have been prohibited from viewing the 'side deals' that govern the
International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) inspections of Iran's
nuclear facilities. Agency officials have said that such inspection
deals typically remain confidential... House Speaker John Boehner (R.,
Ohio), is 'actively considering' a legal challenge against the
administration for violating the review act, Roskam said. 'That will
ultimately be a legal decision based on consultation, but I know that
the appetite for litigation is there,' he said. A lawsuit against the
administration could have a couple of effects, he said. A federal judge
could issue an injunction against the implementation of the nuclear deal
until the administration provides all side agreements, delaying
sanctions relief for Tehran. The prospect of litigation could also
deter Western companies from investing in Iran as the sanctions are
lifted. 'If [companies] get the sense that this is an unsettled
question-there's litigation, and there's a majority in the House
against it, and a majority in the House has already spoken and said
that [the review act] hasn't been complied with-if you're that company,
are you that anxious to jump into the Iranian market if you think it
might jeopardize your relationship to the American market?' he
said." http://t.uani.com/1QL1RkR

Free Beacon:
"Iran is refusing to pay more than $43 billion in court judgments
issued to U.S. victims of the Islamic Republic's terror operations,
prompting two leading senators to back an effort that would prohibit
the Obama administration from unfreezing more than $150 billion in
Iranian assets until that country has settled its debts. The $43
billion in damages to American terror victims were assessed as a result
of some 50 U.S. court cases in recent years, according to official
government estimates. As the Obama administration prepares to release
more than $150 billion in unfrozen cash assets to Iran, Congress is
demanding that these terror victims finally be awarded their money.
Sens. Pat Toomey (R., Pa.) and Mark Kirk (R., Ill.) on Tuesday unveiled
a bill that would prevent the Obama administration from lifting
economic sanctions on Tehran until these U.S. terrorist victims are paid
for the crimes committed by Iranian-funded terrorist proxy groups, such
as Hezbollah, according to a copy of the legislation obtained by the
Washington Free Beacon. 'Iran-sponsored terrorists have killed more
Americans than the Islamic State,' Kirk told the Free Beacon. 'Families
of Americans killed by Iranian-backed terrorism have used U.S. laws to
take Iran to court and lawfully win approximately $43.5 billion in
unsatisfied damages, so if the United States fails to ensure Iran fully
pays these judgments before Iranian terror financiers get over $100
billion in sanctions relief, we risk emboldening Iran and other state
sponsors of terror to continue targeting and killing more Americans.'
... Toomey and Kirk have teamed up to sponsor legislation that would
legally prohibit the Obama administration from providing Iran with
sanctions relief, as is mandated under the recent nuclear deal, until
these victims receive payment. Rep. Patrick Meehan (R., Pa.) has
sponsored a companion version of the legislation in the House." http://t.uani.com/1KRtXY7

AFP:
"US Republicans said Tuesday they were introducing legislation
that would use frozen Iranian assets to pay American victims of Iranian
terrorism before billions of dollars are returned to Tehran as part of
the nuclear deal. Congressional Republicans are furious over President
Barack Obama's landmark accord with world powers that aims to rein in
Iran's nuclear program, in exchange for an easing of sanctions that
have crippled the Islamic republic's economy. They see the Justice for
Victims of Iranian Terrorism Act as a way to stall the deal, or at
least take a major bite out of funds that would be returned to Tehran.
The bill will be introduced this week, according to its sponsor, House
Republican Pat Meehan. 'There are some $43.5 billion in judgments which
have been rendered under American law for victims of acts of Iranian
terror,' with more than 80 lawsuits successfully prosecuted through US
courts, Meehan told reporters. 'Despite this, not one cent has been paid
by Iran,' he said. 'This is an opportunity to change that dynamic.' In
backing the bill, House Speaker John Boehner said it would be unfair
for Obama to 'provide Iran with about $100 billion of their assets
locked up in Western banks, without first paying the victims of Iranian
terrorism.' Meehan said he had virtually unanimous support in his
caucus, and expected the measure also to be introduced this week in the
Senate, where its fate remained less certain." http://t.uani.com/1MG5Tu1

Sanctions
Relief

Bloomberg:
"Iran expects about $29 billion of funds to be unfrozen and
repatriated to its central bank by January 2016 at the latest as
economic sanctions are eased after July's nuclear deal, a senior
central bank official said. 'It'll be around that time,' Gholamali
Kamyab, central bank vice governor for foreign exchange affairs, said
in an interview Friday on the sidelines of an investment conference in
Geneva... The funds are currently being held in different countries and
the sum could eventually exceed $29 billion, Kamyab said. 'There could
be other figures, but that's most of it,' he added. The holdings
include $23 billion in foreign exchange belonging to the central bank
and another $6 billion of government money, according to a recent
report on state television. Iran has no gold held overseas, Kamyab
said." http://t.uani.com/1P5shiG

Reuters:
"Oil sales have allowed Iran to start emptying oil stored onboard
tankers. Starla, the first Iranian supertanker used for floating
storage, sailed for Asia in mid July after the nuclear deal was signed.
Since then, a further six Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) - each
capable of carrying a maximum of 2 million barrels of oil - have
sailed, a tanker tracking source said. The source said one of the
tankers - Derya - had conducted a ship-to-ship transfer with a foreign
tanker in September with at least 1 million barrels of condensate,
which was delivered to a terminal in the United Arab Emirates... U.S.
headquartered broker Poten & Partners estimated 14 VLCCs were storing
Iranian oil, down from 17 in June. Other sources said up to 20 tankers
were still currently storing oil. Windward, a Tel Aviv operated
maritime data and analytics company, estimated this week that Iran was
storing 43.098 million barrels of crude and condensate on vessels at
sea, down from 54 million barrels in early July." http://t.uani.com/1FE1OHb

Shana (Iran):
"Minister of Petroleum Bijan Zangeneh said on Saturday the main
conference on introducing Iran's new oil contracts will convene in the
near future in Tehran. 'The new oil contracts and the projects to be
developed within their scope will be introduced to foreign investors in
a conference in Tehran in month of Aban (Oct 23 - Nov 21),' he told
Shana. Saying that venue of the main event which was due to be held in
London has been shifted to Tehran, the minister added, 'The companies
that cannot make it in Tehran, can participate in the subsequent London
conference.'" http://t.uani.com/1M1A4cc

Tehran Times:
"Etihad Airways, the national airline of the United Arab Emirates,
will increase its flights between Abu Dhabi and Tehran, the capital of
Iran, to ten flights a week from currently seven, beginning on Friday
October 2. The airline increased on April 15 its flights from three
flights a week to a daily service, the IRNA news agency reported on
Tuesday." http://t.uani.com/1Gh6zB4

Shana (Iran):
"President Hassan Rouhani said in the post-sanction era, Italian
companies have the advantage of a better ground for presence in Iran's
oil and gas industry considering their past record of activity. 'In the
new conditions, considering that some Italian firms have had
cooperation with Iran in oil, gas and heavy industries, the ground is
more prepared for their operation in Iran's economy,' he said in a
meeting with Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi in New York on Monday.
There are numerous areas of investment in Iran from the oil and gas
sector to the petrochemical, transport, industries and mine sectors,
the president added, 'In the new era, in addition to investment by the
premier Italian companies, we are interested in transferring of
technology and the joint production of goods.' ... Renzi also welcomed
President Rouhani's upcoming visit to Italy as a move which can further
develop the existing bilateral ties and said, 'Iran and Italy are
treasuries of human civilization and such an infrastructure should be
employed to build a better future.'" http://t.uani.com/1KRyLwC

Trend:
"The Italian gas infrastructure company Snam has not taken a
decision so far to accompany the Italian delegation to Iran in
November, Davide Sempio, head of media external relations at Snam told
Trend Sept. 28. Italy's Deputy Minister of Economic Development Carlo
Calenda will lead a delegation of over a hundred representatives from various
companies and banks to Iran from November 28 to 30. 'We have not taken
a decision on this so far, as the organization of the visit still needs
to be defined on several levels,' Sempio underlined." http://t.uani.com/1VmZMCi

Terrorism

Guardian:
"The United States did not invite Iran to Tuesday's UN summit on
combating Islamic State and other violent extremist groups because it
still designates Iran itself as a state sponsor of terrorism... US
State Department officials confirmed that Iran's designation as a state
sponsor of terrorism was the reason for its exclusion from the
countering Isis summit being chaired by Obama on Tuesday." http://t.uani.com/1FEeqhq

Syria Conflict

AFP:
"Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad must leave office or face being
turfed out by force, Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said,
rejecting Russia's bid to build support for its ally. Speaking in New
York after meeting Saudi Arabia's allies, Jubeir on Tuesday dismissed
Russia's call for a coalition to defend Assad against the Islamic State
group as a 'non-starter.' He warned that other countries would step up
support for rebels from Syria's moderate opposition, leaving Assad with
no choice but to step down or face what he called the 'military
option.' And he scorned Iran's involvement in Russia's putative
alliance, describing Tehran as an 'occupying power' in Syria and
accusing it of fomenting terrorism and extremism across the region...
As to Iran, Jubeir said, the only way it can help is to withdraw. 'Iran
is part of the problem and cannot be part of the solution,' he said.
'It should withdraw its forces from Syria and withdraw the Shiite
militias that it inserted into Syria and then it can talk about a
diplomatic solution,' Jubeir declared. 'But what we're looking at now
is Iran is a occupying force in Syria.' And, asked whether Russia and
Iran might support a transition away from Assad's rule, he admitted:
'Hope is not that great.'" http://t.uani.com/1YOxuzC

AFP:
"US Secretary of State John Kerry suggested Tuesday that Russia and
Iran may persuade Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad to stop
indiscriminately dropping barrel bombs on his own people. Moscow and
Washington disagree sharply about Assad's longer term role in efforts
to end the Syrian war, but have begun cautiously to discuss efforts to
defeat his Islamic State jihadist foes. In an interview with MSNBC News
on Tuesday, Kerry suggested that the cooperation might go deeper than
that and that Moscow and Tehran, Assad's staunch allies, might also
help rein him in. He said that he had discussed the matter with Iranian
officials and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov, whom he is to meet
again this week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. 'And we
raised that yesterday,' he said. 'I did talk with Lavrov about it and I
talked with the Iranians about it.' Kerry went on to say 'they are both
in a position, in exchange perhaps for something that we might do, they
might decide to keep Assad from dropping barrel bombs.'" http://t.uani.com/1KRr09K

Yemen Conflict

WSJ:
"Yemeni President Mansour Hadi on Tuesday accused Iran of seeking
his country's destruction by backing Houthi rebels in Yemen's civil
war. In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly, Mr. Hadi
blamed Iran for supporting what he called a 'military and political
coup d'état' by Houthi rebels to undermine a political transition. 'We
find ourselves mixed in this battle, this fight for this country and
the legitimacy of the state to ensure the country not fall into the
hands of Iran, which would like to see the destruction of the country,'
Mr. Hadi said. 'This was indeed a desperate attempt to impose the
Iranian model through the use of force.'" http://t.uani.com/1M1sGgW

Domestic
Politics

AFP:
"The Iranian foreign minister's reported handshake with US
President Barack Obama triggered chants of 'Death to America' in
Tehran's parliament Wednesday and a warning against 'another kind of
spying'. The foreign ministry has confirmed a 'completely accidental'
encounter between Obama and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif on
the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York on Monday, without
denying there was a handshake as reported by Iran's semi-official ISNA
news agency. But hardline lawmakers went on the offensive against
Zarif. 'With whose permission have they met Obama?' deputy Bahram
Biranvand asked angrily. 'Last time they talked to Obama on the phone
and this time, with whose permission' did Iran's minister shake hands
with the US leader? ... Zarif also came under indirect attack from
Iran's ultraconservative judiciary spokesman, Gholamhossein Mohseni
Ejeie, Fars news agency reported. Without naming Zarif, Ejeie alluded
to the Obama handshake and said: 'Some spies are paid but there is
another kind of spying that we have to watch out for. He prepares the
ground for the enemy. These people would say: Why not allow a friendly
handshake with the enemy? What's wrong with shaking hands with Obama?
What's wrong with sitting with them, chatting away and drinking with
them?'" http://t.uani.com/1VmUkiT

Bloomberg:
"Iranian hard-liners wasted no time labeling Foreign Minister
Mohammad Javad Zarif as 'unrevolutionary' for shaking hands with Barack
Obama. It's the first gesture of its kind between a U.S. president and
a high-ranking Iranian official in more than three decades. It took
place at the United Nations General Assembly in New York and overnight
caused a stir back in Tehran. Lawmaker Hamid Rasaee posted a picture of
a handshake between a man and a red-skinned devil with long black nails
on his Instagram account... 'Two years ago Rouhani spoke with Obama by
chance, last year, Zarif and Kerry took a stroll without any prior
intention in front of international media,' Rasaee said on his
Instagram account. 'This year, Zarif accidentally bumped into Obama and
had an exchange. History is full of these chance encounters,' Rasaee
wrote on his page... 'This action took place even though serious
warnings had been given to the negotiating team to not give the
Americans the opportunity to display such show against the Islamic Republic,'
wrote hard-line news website Rajanews... The symbolic act was 'an ugly
thing to do and Zarif should apologize to the Iranian nation for this,'
said Mansour Haghighatpour, deputy head of the parliament's national
security and foreign policy committee, according to the Fars news
agency. 'Shaking hands with the Americans and drinking Nescafe with
them, this should only happen if they apologize to us.'" http://t.uani.com/1KL61Yw

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against
Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear
Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive
media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with
discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please
email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear
Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in
a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a
regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons. UANI is an
issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own
interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of
nuclear weapons.

http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law

We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org

The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.

The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.