>>171864257I understand what this guy is trying to say, but he equates people like Sargon and the skeptics as being right-wing. They're centrist that may lean right, but not far right. They are indeed not growing anymore because they bring nothing to the table other than "SJWS!!!" Meanwhile actually far-right channels are growing despite constant push against them. They're discussing taboo subjects that leftist won't even touch. It's hilarious seeing leftist in the comments section trying to say they are more vilified by the media than right-wingers.

>>171865946Dr. Layman's positions are really not that impressive desu. I've been watching his videos for a while now, and yes, he is significantly smarter than than Armoured Skeptic^TM or Sargin, but I'd take Greg Conte or Don Camillo against him 100 times over in any kind of formal debate/argument. YouTube doesn't really allow people who are against the status quo from an intelligent perspective to exist for particularly long without getting shoah'd.

>>171866077How can you draw a solid conclusion on a cycle of YouTube swinging left to right? The platform has only been around a little over 10 years. It didn't even have major political YouTubers on the platform until more recently. He's basing his video off very little. Now I do think he is right in some cases. The left will have to polish their arguments or they will continue to fail, but just because some skeptic channels are dying doesn't mean the right is dead for now. Skeptics are usually not even right-leaning they just bash SJW's.

After the "Day For Freedom" in the UK I lost what little respect I had for Sargon and most of the right-wing ecelebs who attended that event, most right wing channels have been completely stagnant since Trump and Brexit were both elected as they are now relatively aimless.

Everyone knows SJWs are cringey as fuck and Islam is atrocious but repeating it endlessly just makes stale viewing. The left will only "win" youtube as it's easier to make fresh content parodying people in charge rather than the large roster of right wing and skeptic e-celebs all jumping to make the same video about the same shitty SJW event of the week; such as that shitty Vice article about how you couldn't parody This is America and like clockwork a large amount of E-celebs make the same glaringly obvious point about how you could make memes about it. Youtube is a entertainment platform, if I want to be informed about events I can watch the news and form my own opinions, if I want to laugh at SJW's I watch the source material, the left wing e-celebs can add content via alternative policy ideas to those currently in power, the right can only mock the opposition or hold rallys to consolidate their bases.

>>171866077>>171866077when were christians ever popular on youtubein real life>2007: People are moving towards atheism. Atheism content is created to bash on low hanging fruit for views.(no mudslime problem yet). >2008/obama election: Feminism?SJW's is becoming more rabid, a bunch of preachy feminist find youtube to preach. Creating a ton of low hanging fruit>2010 content creators start to take this low hanging fruit and create content out of it>2011 fervent libertarian/ron paul support >rabidity of progressive stack increases>Anti-SJW/skeptic golden age ensues as low hanging fruit does>muslim crisis in europe in 2015 and the lack of criticism by atheist/leftist who spent the last decade shitting on christians creates another explosion of skeptics and btfo of atheist>libertarians disenchanted by racial voting demographic gifs and lolbertarian open border policy shatters libertarians>Trump comes on seen, doesn't cuck out. Acts like leader. Brings skeptics, sad lolbertarians, some GOP regulars, and another group under one banner>leftist have a similar thing with bernie>election happens >Trump's online Grand ole party tent breaks off into many smaller groups as the progressive stack has temporarily been halted. >ex-bernie bros attempt to rebuild being btfo on so many levels. Videos of hope like Op vid. And now here we are.

>>171868618>>171864257The point of the video is that they're winning NOW, but that their narrative is going to continue to fall apart as more and more countries and their people continue to turn right wing did you retards actually watch the video?

TLDR: Ryan is not just wrong about the lead theory. He is being intentionally misleading.

Ryan does not spend much time on the lead theory in the video itself, but he did make a lengthy post about it on his blog back in December of 2016.

thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/12/23/race-iq-and-lead

Ryan’s argument is as follows:

1.) The (((CDC))) only released data on the percentage of children that have “elevated” BLL (greater than a cutoff amount). Taking this approach can cause small disparities in averages to look larger than they are.

2.) Black and white people have had roughly equivalent BLL since the 80s.

3.) BLL differences between black and white people diminish significantly in adulthood. This means that childhood lead exposure should not affect adults.*Point 1: The (((CDC))) is publishing misleading data:*Ryan cites two studies that look at actual BLL rather than just the percentage of people that cross some “elevated” threshold.

This is what the chart presented by the (((CDC))) looks like.

i.imgur.com/ZgYjnuY.gif

As you can see, this bar chart shows the proportion of children aged 1-5 with BLL greater than 5 ug/dL. It does not show the average BLL.

Ryan cites two studies that look at actual BLL averages rather than just the percentage of people that cross some “elevated” threshold.

Study 1: Pricket (1994)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8028141

This study is behind a paywall, so I can't draw much from it. It was published in 1994, and most of the data Ryan uses is from after that.

The Tsoi study looks at data up to 2014. The article itself takes the same approach as the CDC does when it comes to data visualization … which is to say, it shows the percentage of people with elevated BLL. However, you can find the data Ryan cites in the supplementary material. Ryan cites data about the general population, NOT just children. When you look at the general population, Ryan is right … at least once you get past 1999. The BLL difference isn’t that big. However, he *conveniently* ignores the data about children DIRECTLY BELOW the data about the general population which does show that black children have significantly higher BLL than white children over the time range of the study.

Wew! Ryan is one disingenuous ass clown. Let's move on.In addition to all this, the (((CDC))) actually did publish some data on actual average BLL levels in 1994 which showed that BLL among black children (4.3 ug/dL) was ~87% higher than white children (2.3 ug/dL). By 2002 the difference decreased to ~56%.

cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5420a5.htm

i.imgur.com/cGpevH7.png

When you combine this with the cutoff based data, it starts to look a lot like the (((CDC))) isn't playing a trick on you after all.

As stated earlier, depending on how you define "significant", this is correct for adults but not children. However, by Ryan’s own admission, lead levels diminish IQ at a decreasing rate the higher you go. In other words, the IQ decrease that results from going from 0-10 ug/dL is greater than the IQ decrease that results from going from 10-20 ug/dL. This suggests that even small differences in BLL can matter when you're at the lower levels.

Note, I didn't look this up myself. Ryan concedes this and even provides and handy dandy table.

i.imgur.com/mmuppdM.png*Point 3: BLL in childhood does not affect adult IQ.*

Now that I have disproven points 1 and 2 for children, Ryan’s entire argument rests on childhood lead exposure NOT effecting adults. The preponderance of evidence suggests that this is false.

"Rice (1985) dosed one group of infant monkeys with lead. Later, when each group’s BLL had fallen to 12 mg/dl or lower, they found that the group exposed to lead in infancy did poorly on cognitive tasks when compared with the control group. Gilbert and Rice (1987) confirmed that this effect lasted into adulthood.”

NOTE: This is a verbatim quote from Ryan’s blog post.Study 2: Bushnell and Browman (1979)

"Bushnell and Browman (1979) fed groups of infant Rhesus monkeys one of three kinds of milk: lead-free milk, milk with low levels of lead, and milk with high levels of lead. Once the monkeys were older children, their blood lead levels (BLLs) were the same. Nonetheless, those who were fed lead as infants scored worse on cognitive tests suggesting that it had done permanent damage to them during development.”

NOTE: This is a verbatim quote from Ryan’s blog post.

Study 3: Reuben (2017)

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2613157

Abstract: "In 565 New Zealanders observed for 4 decades, lead exposure in childhood was significantly associated with lower cognitive function and socioeconomic status at age 38 years. Greater childhood lead exposure was also associated with greater declines in IQ from childhood to adulthood and greater declines relative to parents in occupational socioeconomic status."

>>171869659In conclusion, Ryan is wrong and, based on how he """missed""" an entire table that was inconvenient for his argument located directly below the table that was convenient for his argument, he is probably willing to lie when he thinks he can get away with it.

Almost all of the evidence points to the lead theory being true and this truth is inconvenient for white supremacists.

The black/ white IQ gap has decreased in recent years and black Incarceration rates have dropped. It is highly plausible that decreased racial disparities in childhood lead exposure has something to do with this.BLLs Effect on IQ: i.imgur.com/YxKnEzT.jpg

The "Le Skeptic Movement" wasn't even the beginning of the rise of the right wing on the internet, they aren't even remotely right wing. These people have no concept of reality. Its going to be harsh for them.

>>171868766good list. i was active in the atheist community on youtube.

I didnt know it back then but i saw the beginning of sjw reactions when people like Thunderf00t and Pat Condell shifted their criticism towards islam. probably around 2010. the atheist community was slowing down at that point but people still in it were calling Pat and Thunder racist for challenging islamic faiths.

also remember the libertarian shift when Alt Hype was Fringe Elements, talking about Libertarianism along with Stefan Molyneux

sadly a lot of the old atheist community are now sjw's. Richard the Dick Coghlan and Matt Dillahunty.

>>171864257>ContraPoints is gaining popularity>ContraPoints will be the next Sargoy one dayMaybe having Sargoy of Mossad around is not such a bad idea. His lard of fat is a dam stopping sjw cancer flood youtube.

>>171870506>All of these guys are still around and doing well.They do well because of Patreon and the support base they've had for years or what was advertised by already-popular people. YouTube actively demonetizes content left right and center, specifically "hate speech" although their algorithm is shitty so the major people aren't complaining as much as they would. Channels HAVE been banned. Cultured Thug, Murdoch Murdoch, Aaron Genus, etc.

>>171870219>The black/ white IQ gap has decreased in recent years and black Incarceration rates have dropped. It is highly plausible that decreased racial disparities in childhood lead exposure has something to do with this.You're wrong. It's because blacks are having children with whites.

>>171870735the post industrial world would go vegan if they want any moral superiority. then they should devote some effort to modernizing the rest of the world so we can move beyond old hunting practices and outdated mystical beliefs and leave nature alone.

>>171871636It used to be either you were gay, straight, or lesbian but now there is 5000 different "sexualities" because being gay isn't good enough for them. Queer is the same as gay, pansexual is the same as bisexual, it's so fucking retarded that they have to have 10 different words for one word that already has an established meaning.

>>171872226>they would almost certainly look atPerhaps more studies need to be made with deeper background consideration.>I just showed you that there aren’t that many biracial black/white ppl in the USYou showed a statistic of how people identify, not what they genetically are. In fact there are more black people descending from slave-owners than whites. There is a growing presence of white and other genetics in the African American spectrum and they've chosen to ignore it over the years and stick with "black".

>>171872245>personally stopped people from offing themselvesPeople who want to off themselves should. However I considered that he's not a bad person so I used "shitty human" instead of "shitty person". Perhaps if he sees the chart he'll fix himself up.

>>171872732>Murderer with no friends, abandoned his first child, ignores his Norwegian family>Not at least a little shitty

Half black half white people are 0.82% of Americans. Assuming they were 0% in 1970 and that black people are 10% of the population, and simplifying mixed people to 1%, that leaves us with 10% of black ppl being mixed.

Note, I’m being generous to you with these numbers.

Black IQ increased by 6 pts in 30 years relative to white IQ. Assuming the average mixed person has an IQ of 95.

(.1 * 95) + (.9 * 85) = 86.

This means biracial black people would ONLY increase “black” IQ by one point.

As long as Contrapoints and other leftists are aided by censorship and the shutting down of the opposition in order to control who they think "the right" is, the left will always be seen as fake and bankrupt intellectually and morally.

>>171870519Atheism now seems to be a means to a different end looking back now. It was a knife wielded against christians when christians weren't even fighting atheist. Only trying to slow down the march to degeneracy. Christians were in the right and it culminated in this videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSAeBvbK2Eo

>>171873430>Half black half white people are 0.82% of Americans.You mean 0.82% of Americans identify as part black/white>Assuming they were 0% in 1970Completely untrue. People didn't all-of-a-sudden start mixing after Loving v Virginia. Think Lena Horne or the woman Hidden Figures was about.>that leaves us with 10% of black ppl being mixedAgain, that's a skewed statistic by identity not genetics. You might be right but you need better evidence. There's also not just white mixing. I know a shitload of half black half filipino.

>>171874482The fact of the matter is America is not intaking many new blacks like we are with Hispanics. The black population is in fact mixing out. What I'm saying is it would have been better if there were genetic tests paired with IQ. You might be right, but again, there's so much left out of the picture.

There's also the case of violent full-blacks being killed off (or locked up) and people with black and white great grandparents are having children with people of a similar identity and their children identify as fully black.

>>171874963That meh tier seems a bit off. I'd suggest adding a new tier between good and meh, or move everyone at good to high tier, and balance out meh tier between it and good. I just have a problem with some like E;R and his editing/redpill stuff and one or two others being lumped in with Bearing (Unless he's done something great recently, he was always the "haha look at how fucking stupid these cunts are." which is fine, but doesn't put him that high in my opinion.Of course, it's your thing, but just food for thought. Also should throw in Jared Taylor in there somewhere.

Mimir's Head is still relatively small, but I think he puts out fantastic content. Would suggest everyone check out his political platform video with Cultured Thug. Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumt8XNOF-CCnKkMfRMAO7g

You sure he refuted anything? He uses popular lefty blogs and rationalwiki/wikipedia (ALWAYS read the talk pages on "controversial" topics. Quite interesting...) in order to get his answers.What he and his kind do not discuss, and what almost nobody discusses, is that we are dividing up along the lines of worldviews. Debate is ending because nobody is listening.

Modernism, postmodernism, positivism and the rotten fruits of 18th and 19th century philosophy need to be overturned. "Intellectuals", especially the self proclaimed ones, need to be brought down a few notches. It needs to be humbled. The more I understand, the less I know, and the more I am sure most intellectuals are clueless.

the left will eventually hit pederasty levels of perversion and degeneracy. at this point im watching the decay of the west and hope it finally dies. france has communists and islamists destabilizing the country, they eventually will hit a civil war. bring on death and destruction. it is all so tiresome waiting

>>171864257I got my right wingish channel banned from youtube. I got some strange strikes, made everything private, then got a fake strike about sexualizing minors. All I did was read news stories. Never even mentioned a minor. Youtube will just make things up to get rid you.

>>171868829Vernaculis and Thunderfoot should be under Gas for being horsefuckers, Destiny isn't even on here and he should be gassed as hard as possible. Curious how you feel about Blaire White and shoe0nhead.

>>171872522That's their opinion of how they think women speak, even though it's hilariously wrong and just makes them look like huge assholes. Of course, they'd be the ones to know what having a huge asshole is like.

>>171864257Because they have a draconian spy network censoring all of their competition? And even then they still lose. Imagine how pathetic you have to be to have a leviathan bureaucracy pulling for you and you still can't get people to watch your shit.

>>171881899I'm not saying she's based but she's helping our movement even if she's a coal burning jew. This the problem with /pol/ you're so blackpilled and nihilistic that you don't know when to accept even a small victory

>>171882338Because you get buttblasted over a word and can't bring yourself to watch a 20 minute video and actually address THE ARGUMENTS. What are you scared watching a tranny will turn you gay or something?

>>171882931Isn't this the guy whose grand counter argument to nationalists and ethno-nationalists "omg why are we talking with nazis?"

Also the problem with the term 'racism' is that its a phantasm term like heretic or witch, the burdens of proof is nonexistance for getting to stick someone with it. Is it racist that banks refuse loans to blacks, even though we can reveal that blacks have disproportionately bad credit scores and that all of the data points to loaning to them is a bad idea? How about if I and my family don't want to live in a black neighborhood or have black neighbors because statistically after a certain percentage inevitably crime and murder go up. Do I need to explain myself first about why I don't pursue racial equity first or is it racist that I look after my interests and the interests of my family first?

>>171883717Lol>>171884861I haven't even watched it. My original post was responding to two faggots complaining about it without watching it. Maybe s/he addresses it in the vid, if your curious watch it, but please just don't bitch about shit that you don't even fucking watch. That kind of brainlet behavior is peak nu/pol/.

>>171865986Left-Right is fucked anyway.There's just two elements in politics:>collectivism>individualismThe left (Marxists) likes to destroy people's individual liberties thinking that it's an easier way to make their collective (the state) stronger.The right (see below) meanwhile tends to understand that the collective will only be as strong as its weakest link.When it comes to doing something about the weakest links, the right gets divided and categorised according to what gouvernment measures in what capacity are acceptable, or even whether such a thing should be pursued through the gouvernment.Marxists meanwhile use the weakest links as their cannon fodder with which they undermine individual powers, convincing those links to do their bidding by making false promises.

In my opinion this is what makes Jesus Christ and his story so powerful.He embodied the idea of the divine individual: a participant in society who is so powerful that he sweeps the underachievers and demoralised people off their feet and takes them with him in the wake of excellence, and in so doing made the greater tribal collective he belonged to stronger.Compare that to the exact opposite: Tony Blair, Angela Merkel, George Soros, Rothschilds, etc. People who make everyone weaker so they don't have to try to become stronger themselves in order to stand above the rest.

That's why the right gets censored and the left still fails.If you are on the right, you are already trying to be the best version of yourself, and maybe even helping others do the same.In order to be on the left, you can't be any good.

>>171885784>Boomer>MillennialFaggot/pol/tardSpeak>insult which is invariably hurled at anyone whom has an opinion that the MillennialFaggot/pol/tard disagrees with.>Actual age and generational identity of the accused "Boomer" doesn't matter to the MillennialFaggot/pol/tard.>MillennialFaggot/pol/tard is trying to present himself as the smartest person in the room, despite the fact that if brains were gasoline, he couldn't run a piss ant's go-cart one lap around a Cheerio.

>>171864257youtube (and google) bans and demonetizes anyone the disagrees with them, disables comments and feedback for their diversity pushes, keeps fucking around with notifications and search algorithms. all this and they are still on the back foot.>winning