I noticed that our U.S. government now bends over backwards to facilitate the adoption of Cambodian infants. Yet White married couples seeking to adopt a White baby or young child are confronted with every conceivable obstacle to that goal. Is not this an egregious showing of that evil "racism" that our government claims to oppose with all its heart?

F. Stewart

Dear Mr. Stewart:

The hostility of the establishment toward our race screams out in the area of children.

First, even before you get to the adoption issue, have you noticed the hostility which permeates the media in discussion of things like "in vitro" fertilization and other scientific break throughs in fertility?

The media is full of articles raging against "surrogate mothers" who enable a couple the woman of which is infertile or who cannot physically bear a child, to have a child of a high genetic inheritance.

The media which has no moral scruples about anything - from Michael Jackson to Madonna and worse - suddenly becomes hyper prim and proper and become clones of the most sexually repressive type of Victorian evangelical preacher.

You see the same thing in regard to the screening of donors to sperm banks.

The media is very uncomfortable that the donors are limited to young men with no genetic physical or mental diseases, with high IQs and superb physical health.

The war on children continues with the systematic psychological war directed at young Whites, especially males, on TV, in the schools and so on.

The media tells us repeatedly how important it is for young people to have good role models who will lift their self esteem. We hear all about this when the subject is the flattering, exagerated and phony glorification of every obscure minority member who has achieved a modicum of success.

Well then? If this is so important in creating a healthy psychology in a child, then what does it tell us when the media and the government school system bombard young Whites with negative stuff about their race and their racial heroes?

It tells us that these people want and intend to hurt the children of our race.

And I think the main reason why we see so much drug abuse and things like that among young White males is the fact that these guys have been psychologically raped and devastated by the establishment in the media and the schools.

The establishment - visualize it as child molestor/child abuser.

Sam Dickson
They just can't stand the idea that the best are being reproduced.

Of course, I think White activists should be role models for the broader White community. The media invests a lot to make sure that the masses see White activists alternately as kooks and hatemongers. Sam has emphasized to me that the people who endorse our cause should endeavor to be the best educated, economically self-sufficient, solid members of the cummunity, from that base, they are afforded a podium from which to speak to the racial issues confronting us. Instead we have often been represented by the very worst examples of Whiteness not the best.

There is nothing quite as powerful as two or more young, well-dressed, articulate White Activists showing up for a city council meeting to press a pro-White issue. Our opponents aren't used to organized, thoughtful opposition. They have become accustomed to fighting us with stereotypes and knee-jerk TV slogans. Unfortunately too much attention has been directed to the Jerry Springer types and not enough to Activists like the three young men who counter protested the 300+ multi-culti nuts in Lewiston, Maine.

__________________

"The future belongs to the few of us still willing to get our hands dirty."

Mr. Duke,
I know where you stand this election, however, what are your thoughts of Pat Buchanan's idea of voting Bush in for another term so his administration should rightfully deal with the chaotic problems they caused in Iraq etc...

I don't know where you stand, Mr. Duke, and I'm interested. It's a difficult one. As I see it, Bush and Kerry are out, Nader has a totally liberal leftist for a running mate, and Peroutka has a zealous Christian Zionist running mate.

As Sam says, "in many dimensions." And he tried to explain the relationship between Southern nationalists and white patriots.

So let me jump in here. Southerners can face the Jews because we have a very similar affiinity with each other.

But it is not an EXCLUSIVE affinity. A New Englander considers himself an aristocrat because "The Lodges speak only to the Cabots, and the Cabots speak only to God."

Europeans consider an aristocrat to be somebody who disdains anybody who is not what they call "an aristocrat."

The defining myth of Southern aristocracy is when a French journalist noted that, when a black man stood and took off his hat and said to Robert E. Lee. "Good day, General Lee," Lee doffed his hat in return.

Tha Frenchman said, "Genral Lee, you just took off your hat to a SLAVE!"

Lee replied, ""He cannot be more polite than I am."

Which is why our soldiers followed Confederate leaders to hell and back. That is the way we understand nobility from the base of our souls. An aristocrat is part of his people. THEY decide whether is an aristocrat or not. They decide that by following him up that hill.

We are polite to non-whites, but we are altogether white. To a true Southern gentleman, the idea of snobbery is alien.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Dickson

David,
What you say is very true.
This is a difficult subject with many dimensions.
We have to put our best foot forward.
Naturally, our enemies in the media will always try to do the opposite and pick the worst person.
We need to be on our best behavior, etc.
At the same time, however, we need to remember that there is a place for every member of our racial community in this struggle.
Just because someone is a good speaker, does not mean that he has talents in other areas.
The class war - which our marxist enemies use to divide our race - goes both ways.
There is the resentment of the guys in the ranks for the guy in the coat and tie.
There is also the contempt of the snobs for the guys in the ranks.
And in America, the greatest harm to our race arises from the snob contingent in the racially divisive class war - the elites who have contempt for ordinary men and women.
Every member of our race has something he can lend to the cause.
Without injecting any religious element into the conversation, we can borrow the words of the old Gospel song:
"If you cannot pray like Peter,
If you cannot preach like Paul,
Go out and tell your neighbor,
That he died to save us all."
We need to remember that even someone who can only fill a chair and give a couple of dollars a month has an important role to play.
Sam

Sam, if you have time, could you talk a little about your idea of going after the elite youth at name universities?

At first it sounds like pure heresy to our working-class agenda, but maybe, just maybe, we can teach them what a true aristocracy is.

Sam Dickson is the only one of us who has even mentioned this idea. It sounds like heresy, but, in the eyes of one redneck who is an honorary Boston Southie, who has been told by West Virginia coal-miners, "He speaks for us" and who has one hell of a ecord for speaking for real white working people -- naturally I talking about me -- Sam's concept here is genius.

It may be too complex for him to discuss in a hurry, but I repeat, it is genius.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Dickson

Dear Mr. Stewart:

The hostility of the establishment toward our race screams out in the area of children.

First, even before you get to the adoption issue, have you noticed the hostility which permeates the media in discussion of things like "in vitro" fertilization and other scientific break throughs in fertility?

The media is full of articles raging against "surrogate mothers" who enable a couple the woman of which is infertile or who cannot physically bear a child, to have a child of a high genetic inheritance.

The media which has no moral scruples about anything - from Michael Jackson to Madonna and worse - suddenly becomes hyper prim and proper and become clones of the most sexually repressive type of Victorian evangelical preacher.

You see the same thing in regard to the screening of donors to sperm banks.

The media is very uncomfortable that the donors are limited to young men with no genetic physical or mental diseases, with high IQs and superb physical health.

The war on children continues with the systematic psychological war directed at young Whites, especially males, on TV, in the schools and so on.

The media tells us repeatedly how important it is for young people to have good role models who will lift their self esteem. We hear all about this when the subject is the flattering, exagerated and phony glorification of every obscure minority member who has achieved a modicum of success.

Well then? If this is so important in creating a healthy psychology in a child, then what does it tell us when the media and the government school system bombard young Whites with negative stuff about their race and their racial heroes?

It tells us that these people want and intend to hurt the children of our race.

And I think the main reason why we see so much drug abuse and things like that among young White males is the fact that these guys have been psychologically raped and devastated by the establishment in the media and the schools.

The establishment - visualize it as child molestor/child abuser.

Sam Dickson
They just can't stand the idea that the best are being reproduced.

In answer to John Morgan, I'll be bringing the matter of endorsing the New Orleans Protocol or, at least, affiliating with the sentiments, when I attend the CoCC Board of Directors' meeting in Nashville in November.

I know the approach of Gordon Lee Baum . CEO of the CoCC, is in harmony with the NOP. The CoCC does not trash other movement groups or leaders; the tone of the CoCC newspaper, the CITIZENS' INFORMER, now edited by Dr. Sam Francis is of a respectable and high tone; and the CoCC is a grassroots citizens' lobby group and has no truck with violence.