putin and trump metting at april may cause chronisation of left dementia, putin’s sneaky agenda (from mpov)is to stir turmoils inside US. and trump may swindle Europe little bit. new US ambassador to EU predicted gisintegration of europe, not bad actually even if they do not see it this way.

Their “thoughts” are always-already subservient to the non-thought “equality at all costs”. Hopefully by 2117 history will have been revised so that the stigma of inverted sublimity “Deutschland Uber Alles” carries will apply instead to “Equality Uber Alles”. The illogic of the leftist is such that s/he won’t even be happy once every person on earth is a pygmy–that would simply mark the beginning of the march toward making every pygmy into a primate! “Equalism” is a misnomer when its crypto-leveling tendency is unveiled; it should be more properly called “subtractionism” or “divisionism”.

It’s the opposite. That augers well for world peace because they know not to fuck with a country with an insane president who has the full might of the strongest military in the world behind behind him.

Deep inside the Cathedral, you are like a fish. When you get redpilled, you start walking on land, learn there is air, land and sea. If you’re in the ocean, you think the ocean is progressive and good, and land dwelling is devolution, regressive, moving backwards.

While its fun to annoy the cucks and left with Putin bro isms, if he deserves our respect then he deserves our cautious handling.Lets not forget hes married to admins landlord king now and there is bound to be pillow talk. Theres no way at this point trump gets between them the nigger and dike squandered that opportunity. So what do they want, time probably. Fortunately we all need time.

You know, I wanted to write a long rant about how your Locke post shows lack of awareness of how a strong motivator loyalty is to NOT exit, and it is especially weird given how English poets seem to be world’s best in talking about this (Brooke: The Soldier, Eliot: Little Gidding), really your non-romantic non-emotional non-tribal worldview really begs the question if you can predict the behavior of less robotic, lower IQ, more passionate humans correctly. “Muh feels”, to quote that awesome political compass, is a hugely important input data for any Spock who wants to calculate a prediction of human behavior.

But then this stuff in this article and the linked ones is more than excellent and now all is “forgiven”. This is you at your best. This is the first time I hear about Chicken in Game Theory and it really fills a gap because PD’s are bit too optimistic for many conflicts. And your prediction that Chicken leads to the table turning once the repeated loser has not much to lose seems to be absolutely watertight.

But there is a condition – it is only so if the repeated loser does not lose the car. The logic of conflict is that losers are disarmed and / or get resources taken away precisely to weaken them.

Do conservatives have enough resources left to credibly threaten a destructive collision with? Well, they have the White House now. But when the White House is on a collision course with the deep state, the media, CIA and all that, who wins? Maybe by the time conservatives got to the point where they have not much to lose and will no longer swerve, they are driving a Trabant against a Kenworth truck and will just get pancaked.

“Do conservatives have enough resources left to credibly threaten a destructive collision with? … Maybe by the time conservatives got to the point where they have not much to lose and will no longer swerve, they are driving a Trabant against a Kenworth truck and will just get pancaked.”