Abstract

In a review of recent cross-cultural evidence on happiness and well-being, the authors identified substantial cultural variations in (1) cultural meanings of happiness, (2) motivations underlying happiness, and (3) predictors of happiness. Specifically, in North American cultural contexts, happiness tends to be defined in terms of personal achievement. Individuals engaging in these cultures are motivated to maximize the experience of positive affect. Moreover, happiness is best predicted by self-esteem. In contrast, in East Asian cultural contexts, happiness tends to be defined in terms of interpersonal connectedness. Individuals engaging in these cultures are motivated to maintain a balance between positive and negative affects. Moreover, happiness is best predicted by perceived embeddedness of the self in a social relationship. Directions for future research are discussed.

Heine, S.J. and D.R. Lehman: 1995, ‘Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, pp. 595–607.Google Scholar

Kitayama, S. and H.R. Markus: 1999, ‘Yin and yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence’, in D. Cervone and Y. Shoda (eds), The Coherence of Personality: Social Cognitive Bases of Personality Consistency, Variability, and Organization (Guilford, New York), pp. 242–302.Google Scholar

Kitayama, S., H.R. Markus, H. Matsumoto and V. Norasakkunkit: 1997, ‘Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Selfenhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, pp. 1245–1267.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Kitayama, S., B. Mesquita and M. Karasawa: 2004, The emotional basis of independent and interdependent selves: Socially disengaging and Engaging emotions in the US and Japan. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.

Ryan, R.M., K.M. Sheldon, T. Kasser and E.L. Deci: 1996, ‘All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation’, in P.M. Gollwitzer and J.A. Bargh (eds), The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior (The Guilford Press, New York, NY, US), pp. 7–26.Google Scholar