The school captain: Ryan has it all… or at least he did, until an accident snatched his dreams away. How will he rebuild his life and what does the future hold for him now?

The newcomer: Charlie’s just moved interstate and she’s determined not to fit in. She’s just biding her time until Year 12 is over and she can head back to her real life and her real friends…

The loner: At school, nobody really notices Matty. But at home, Matty is everything. He’s been single-handedly holding things together since his mum’s breakdown, and he’s never felt so alone.

The popular girl: Well, the popular girl’s best friend… cool by association. Tammi’s always bowed to peer pressure, but when the expectations become too much to handle, will she finally stand up for herself?

The politician’s daughter: Gillian’s dad is one of the most recognisable people in the state and she’s learning the hard way that life in the spotlight comes at a very heavy price.

Five unlikely teammates thrust together against their will. Can they find a way to make their final year a memorable one or will their differences tear their world apart?

Review

The blurb of The Yearbook Committee reminds me of The Breakfast Club — essentially five students from different cliques forced to spend some time together and then later become friends. It also reminds me of Riley Redgate’s Seven Ways We Lie, which is a really great example of how multiple perspectives can add to a story. This book, however, is a little shakier, a little more confused, and overall weaker than those two titles.

I’ve said time and time again that I’m not a huge fan of multiple perspectives, the first major reason being they normally don’t add anything to the story (i.e. when it’s just different perspectives of the same scenes), and the second being that characters often sound the same. Personally, The Yearbook Committee succeeds with the former, but kind of fails with the latter.

Everything seemed uncertain, different, damaged. Just like the promise of our youth, now irreversibly changed due to a night whose sinister warning had been brewing steadily beneath the surface of our teenage dreams.

The multiple POVs in this book are used to further the story. Each character, for the most part, has their own life and problems, so whenever we switch to their chapter it’s a guarantee that the plot will move. Personality-wise, they are different and quite distinctive, but voice-wise, they still sound like one person speaking. If it weren’t for the obviously named chapters, I would’ve gotten lost ten times over.

We have five characters, all of whom has one distinctive trait to define them: Gillian (The Good Girl), Charlie (The Cool Girl), Tammi (The Popular Girl), Ryan (The Popular Guy), and Matt (The Loner Guy). Some of these characters play a larger part in the bookwhile others, unfortunately, I feel are kind of thrown out the window when convenient.

The yearbook committee had started out as a random bunch of people who walked the same halls, sat the same exams, shared the ordinary school experiences that became extraordinary as we learnt to look beyond one another’s facade, Facebook profile picture, group of friends.

It might be Ayoub’s intent to have some of these five in the spotlight and others not, but there were moments where I realised certain characters haven’t appeared in a while and wonder where they went. Because of this, they felt underdeveloped, and whatever changes they went through seemingly came out of nowhere. I’m also sad to say that I didn’t particularly like any of them (though I didn’t hate any of them), so there wasn’t much connection between me and the characters.

One great thing about The Yearbook Committee is that it deals with many serious issues: parent-children relationships, bullying, mental health, drug and alcohol use, and confusion about the future, among other things. The messages that Ayoub attempts to say through the characters are certainly relevant to today’s teenage generation:

That’s the thing about choices. They’re an act of knowledge, of faith, of love. It’s how we make them that sets us apart, because every single day, worlds are colliding, and our choices shape so much more than just our own story.

Ayoub’s writing style was fast-paced, light-hearted, engaging, and occasionally funny — overall quite suited to the tone of this book, at least until A Certain Something happened. I won’t comment too much on it other than saying that its abruptness made the whole incident seem a bit cheap, unfortunately, and I didn’t feel like the characters reacted to this Certain Something as emotionally or as well as they could, so it didn’t have much emotional impact on me either.

With five different characters and multiple subplots to conclude, it doesn’t surprise me when intentionally or not, Ayoub leaves some things open-ended, unfinished, unresolved. This was the biggest strike of the book for me, so even though I enjoyed reading the book and found it quick and overall engaging, I wouldn’t be actively campaigning for The Yearbook Committee. I’d still recommend it, but I would likely only mention it when specifically asked.

I always love books that ‘force’ a group of different people to work together! It’s always refreshing to see the dynamic between them 😀 I personally don’t quite enjoy multiple POV either, but it’s because I always love one POV more than the others that I sometimes want to skip through a certain POV :’) but yes, it is prone to having ‘same voices’, especially between teenagers. I also enjoy books dealing with real life issues because they’r sooo relatable and I love drama if it is unrelated to me haha great review Reg! 😀

Thank you! I think multiple POV can be good but it’s veryyy hard to get right (for me): the voices have to sound different and distinguishable, and their stories have to complement instead of repeat one another. If you like books that deal with real life issues, though, this one definitely does that. 😛

I don’t really remember Rick Riordan doing multiple POV, but I’ve read his Percy Jackson books and can safely say that I like his writing! I hope you do put this one on your TBR, though. Quite worth the read. ❤

Great review my friend! I’m sad to hear that the book was a little disappointing because I literally shelved it like three days ago on my TBR pile on Goodreads. I might still give it a shot because I’ve been interested in a lot of OZYA thanks to you bloggers haha Have you heard of Yellow by Megan Jacobson?

Thank you! I’d recommend that you give it a try anyway – you might enjoy it more than I do (many people did). I actually really liked reading it but when I sat down to think about it I just noticed a couple of flaws I couldn’t ignore. 😛

The writing was actually really good – there were just other flaws I couldn’t really ignore, haha. I don’t mind a bit of The Breakfast Club because it’s such a classic idea and I love the whole “band of misfits” trope, though. 😛

Such a great review, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts about this book. I have heard about it before, on your blog and on Jenna’s blog as well (Reading With Jenna), and it sounded like a great story. I’m not a fan of multiple POV, but I really enjoyed Seven Ways We Lie, so I thought that I could handle that one ahah. I’m a bit sad to hear you got more confused with the different characters and that they don’t have a distinctive voice, and some of them feel a bit underdevelopped. it’s too bad, that book could have a lot of potential. I think I’ll try it out anyways, because I’m curious about all of it, and despite this, it sounds like an enjoyable read overall 🙂

I think Jenna loved it, and I can totally see why! I’d say though that this book doesn’t handle multiple POVs as well as Seven Ways We Lie, and the characters are just not as likable (to me). Overall it was still pretty enjoyable, though, so I can’t wait for you to get your hands on it. ❤

This is a great review Reg! I’ll admit the blurb reminded me a little of the Breakfast Club as well, I still haven’t seen that film though, it’s a shame it didn’t live up to the expectations though. I guess when you’re dealing with five POVs it can be a little hard to give them enough page time to make them all individual characters you know.
It sounds like everything else was pretty good though. From the sounds of your review the writing was engaging and the book deals with some serious issues which were obviously relevant like you said. Normally I don’t mind open endings, I didn’t mind it in More Than This by Patrick Ness but I think it suited the genre of the story more than anything else.

I actually haven’t seen that film as well but I’ve seen SO MANY CLIPS that it almost feels like I have, haha. But yes, the multiple POVs let me down a little in this book, though I’d say that overall the writing was still good and I still had a good experience reading it.

I’m a bit ambivalent about open endings! I like to think that I don’t mind them, but I also generally feel like they’re rushed when I encounter them in a book. Time and place for everything, I suppose. 😛

Yeah I know the feeling. It’s like that with old films there’s so much about them out there you can feel like you’ve seen it without ever watching it!
I think there’s a lot of development that needs to happen in a novel for me to connect with characters and with multiple POVs that can sometimes get diluted the more characters an author tries to focus on.
Yeah I suppose. I think a lot of the time with books I like a definitive ending, something that closes everything up for the characters but there are times when opening endings work better, though it takes me a while to accept that it’s the end you know? 🙂