Sign up for our Wine Club today.

Two residents of the 6,000-person city of Alpine were arrested early Tuesday morning on grounds of trespassing after they chained themselves to the entrance gates of a pipeline-construction site owned and operated by Energy Transfer Partners (ETP), the Dallas-based energy company responsible for the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). Dozens more stood by, holding electric tea lights and signs denouncing the energy company.

Inspired by the fight against the DAPL near the Standing Rock Reservation in North Dakota, the group was protesting a different ETP pipeline project. The Trans-Pecos Pipeline will cut through the spare and pristine Big Bend region of Texas to the border of Mexico, transporting natural gas into Mexico’s interior.

This was the latest in a more-than-two-year battle to halt the pipeline’s construction, during which its opponents have fought vigilantly, albeit through more institutionalized avenues. Since news of the pipeline began to spread in the spring of 2015, residents concerned about the environmental impact of the pipeline and its infringement on private land have collected signatures and rallied the support of local governance. They sat through condemnation hearings, and even filed suit against the pipeline company. They filed more than 600 comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the agency responsible for regulating the small segment of pipeline that would stretch beneath the Rio Grande, and requested that the entire length of the pipeline be subject to environmental review. Their request was denied in May of this year, and ETP continued construction at full steam.

Many feel their voices have fallen on deaf ears. Now, tired and disillusioned after years of protesting, and with the pipeline very near completion, opponents of the Trans-Pecos Pipeline are trying direct action for the first time.

“Our community has tried protesting in all the other acceptable ways,” said Lori Glover, a representative of the Big Bend Defense Coalition who was one of the two arrested Tuesday. “This is the last resort.”

This week’s victory at Standing Rock, in which the Army Corps of Engineers announced it would not permit the pipeline to be drilled under the Missouri River, underscored the power of direct action. Indigenous organizers and, eventually, thousands of supporters camped on the banks of the Cannonball River to protect their ancestral lands and water source. Their united action, even in the face of police violence, proved that last resorts can work.

3

4

5

“[Standing Rock] in North Dakota has really reinvigorated the whole movement,” said Trans-Pecos Pipeline opponent David Keller, an archeologist who earlier this year watched as ETP pummeled through an ancient Native American site at Trap Spring, whose State Archeological Landmark status was pending at the time.

In fact, the events at Standing Rock have inspired the opposition to rethink their approach entirely. At a recent meeting, during which the opposition clandestinely discussed plans for Tuesday’s action, they talked about shifting the verbiage of their protest to more closely resemble that of the protest in North Dakota.

“It’s not protesting—it’s protecting,” said pipeline opponent Virginia Brotherton. “That’s what they are using and I agree that we need to use the same verbiage.”

The group also discussed making water the focus of their protest to echo the “water is life” motto of the Standing Rock movement. After all, they said, the Trans-Pecos Pipeline would cross beneath the Rio Grande, as well as a handful of regional watersheds.

But some among them worry that folding their fight into the movement at Standing Rock might undermine other significant issues highlighted by that fight—namely, the centuries-long mistreatment of indigenous tribal communities in the United States.

Ready to Fight Back? Sign Up For Take Action Now

“This is about indigenous people’s issues, and their horrific treatment for centuries,” said pipeline opponent Coyne Gibson. “I want to be respectful of their accomplishments.”

Others see it as a collective fight. “We’re not piggybacking,” Glover said. “This is one big fight that we have before us and it’s scary but it’s also a wonderful opportunity for us because this is not just about our little space here or their space up in North Dakota. This is about how our water is going to be protected all over America.”

Indeed, theirs is just one regional pipeline fight among dozens like it that are taking place across the nation, with local residents embattled in near-identical fights. In West Virginia and Virginia, for example, residents concerned about the $3.5 billion Mountain Valley natural gas pipeline have formed an alliance to oppose the project, which they say threatens their underground water supplies. Resistance is also gathering against the Bayou Bridge pipeline, another ETP project, which would snake through 60 miles of Louisiana and Texas. Still, few outside these and other municipalities engaged in local pipeline fights have taken notice.

“The system is rigged against us,” was a common refrain at Tuesday’s protest in West Texas.

But those fighting for their sacred land and water rights at Standing Rock have accomplished what few other pipeline protests could—they’ve garnered national media attention.

Opponents of the Trans-Pecos Pipeline are eager to do the same. “Even if we don’t stop it altogether, we’re bringing a lot of awareness to this issue in order to pressure, to get our government to change oil and gas infrastructure regulation,” Glover said.

“We went through the proper channels. We did our due diligence. But we weren’t given the time of day and the facts didn’t seem to matter,” she added. “Now, it’s time for something beyond facts. We have to go beyond that in order to get our government to pay attention and listen to us.”

As protesters stood in the early morning darkness beneath a sky replete with stars—one of the biggest draws to the region are its dark skies, which opponents say could be affected by the pipeline infrastructure—they began to sing the popular Woody Guthrie song, “This Land Is Your Land,” but they changed a few of its verses.

“From North Dakota to the Big Bend region,” they sang, as local law-enforcement officers took bolt cutters to the bike lock that chained Glover to the entrance gate. “From the Missouri River to the Rio Grande waters,” they continued, as she was helped up and escorted into the sheriff’s vehicle. “This land was made for you and me.”

Sasha von OldershausenSasha von Oldershausen is an Iranian-American journalist, based out of West Texas. She has written for The Guardian, Texas Monthly, and NBC News, among others.

Can industrial energy ever be "green"? What are the criteria? Another case of industry hijacking and redefining a term? Even when an Environmental Impact Assessment is done, it's all speculation and conjecture, gobbledy gook and hogwash. Murphy's law says that if industrial man can muck it up, he will. The Ice Pack is all but completely melted, the Mississippi River Delta is a dead-zone, the Gulf of Mexico an oily mess, we have 100 year floods every couple of years, earthquakes in Oklahoma, and bird-killing cellphone towers everywhere.

For too long, bankers and speculators have raped the land and created demands for the plunder. Whether it's gold or diamonds, coal or gas, they promise riches to poor folk (often at gunpoint) to mine and drill, process and transport the "commodity," and then leave the place a barren wasteland. They bribe armed and armored mercenary soldiers to kick peace-loving people out of their homes.

Demublicans are owned by dirty corporations that will do anything to protect their liberty to destroy and exploit Nature for profit.

This ain't about protecting water, it's about protecting the Life Source, Mother Earth. Capitalists don't get it, because they've been enculturated. They think money is the source of their life, and their life is the only one that matters.

Please, my Native American Sisters and Brothers, show us a Good way.

(11)(0)

Moira Saucedosays:

December 11, 2016 at 10:48 am

You may notice fossil fuels is not a booming business. It's been thirty years since we've built a nuclear plant, same as an oil refinery. The growth is in the green industry.

(9)(0)

Walter Pewensays:

December 10, 2016 at 12:21 am

It seems that in the United States, in 2016, it's really late in history for all these pipelines to be constructed. Given, say the companies know they can sell to Mexico. It's the old, just because you can, should you? I really don't think it's naive to say we'd like a moratorium on all of these type of activities over sensitive areas, but I know the big "manly" energy companies of Dallas and Houston would have it no other way. Texas has not given the Union much of value in a long time. The collective energy of that state is going to bring the entire country down with it.
Seriously, it seems there is little that can be done except in individual instances. Frequently the locals wait too long, as they did here with Diablo Canyon nuclear plant in California. By the time the resistance was high, the plant was almost finished and went online as scheduled. Something for people in cities on the coasts and elsewhere to think long and hard about. Once it's built in a pristine area, it's built, and nothing stops the companies from getting their money back. Nothing people don't know, but I think a lot of people who hang in the metro areas constantly do not realize the intensity these things have. They drive right by Diablo Canyon daily and don't see it because of the topography. But it is there, basically forever.