I was imagining that we'd just have the CSSOM information on the CSS
property page, since the content unique to the CSSOM page would be
vanishingly small.
Janet, how did you approach this in MDN?
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:37 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:
> I propose that we would still have separate pages for the CSS and CSSOM
> versions. They will simply share most of the content (the actual content
> will reside at the CSS version).
>
> ☆*PhistucK*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>wrote:
>
>> Phistuck, are you proposing having separate pages for the CSSOM property
>> and the CSS property, with somewhat automatic linking between them? Or are
>> you proposing just having CSSOM details on the CSS property pages?
>>
>> I think it would be great to automatically generate the CSSOM name based
>> on the CSS Property name while allowing overrides for the odd cases (some
>> of which you mention). However as far as I know there's no easy way to
>> camelcase text in MediaWiki--perhaps there's an extension that others are
>> aware of?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Dec 2012, at 09:01, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Every CSS property has its CSSOM counterpart.
>>> > For example, float has cssFloat, font-weight has fontWeight.
>>> >
>>> > As far as I know, both of them share the same values.
>>> > Therefor, we should make one draw from the other (CSSOM would draw
>>> from CSS). If values are added or removed from the CSS property, the CSSOM
>>> property should also be updated automatically.
>>> >
>>>
>>> This sounds like a great idea that would save a lot of time in the long
>>> run, if it were possible. What's another template between friends? ;-)
>>>
>>> > I guess we could do that by adding a field to the CSS property form,
>>> that holds its CSSOM counterpart name.
>>> > Can we populate it automatically according to the naming convention?
>>> can we take the CSS property name (API_name, I guess) and automatically
>>> convert it camelCase by default? Of course, the field should still be
>>> editable in case some properties do not use this exact convention
>>> (cssFloat, MozColumns)?
>>> >
>>> > Maybe the summary/overview or other sections should also be drawn.
>>> Examples should not be drawn.
>>> >
>>> > Another idea -
>>> > Completely remove the CSSOM property pages and make them redirect to
>>> the CSS property page.
>>> > (I am not in favor of this idea.)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ☆PhistucK
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>