If you showed the original, then we could compare before and after processing, so analysis would be easier. But you show your "I did this myself" and another version. Without knowing the original, we can only guess what the other version has done.

We can say there are multiple effects. Massive edge enhancement, and/or line detection, removal of high-frequency detail, and some kind of colour simplification.

Those lines on the floor, yes. It may be imposed texture lines after the main image processing.

But the other line? They are made from real edges? As they are made so clean and smooth? How this can be done in automatic mode? Because this is done automatically. And I'm sure that this is done imagemagick and not use any neural network.

fmw42 wrote:We would need to see the input image for your last grayscale example. Also where did you get the result of the room image that you want to match in Imagemagick.

You did not answer my questions about your platform and Imagemagick version?

I have a Linux platform. ImageMagick7. We have a website with photo505.com effects just on imagemagick
I saw the effects on third-party sites and would like to repeat them. Primarily with the edges. Because I'm sure there are also used Imagemagick, although they mimic neural art. But in fact, do not use neural art.

Black and white photographs also with one of the services, and I am not sure on how it is implemented.

Without knowledge of the method they use and/or input images, it is very hard to reverse engineer effects. What are the other web sites from which you got these examples. Is one of them pho.to? Your room example looks kind of like what they produce. I do not know what they do. What makes you think the other web sites are using Imagemagick?