Comments on: Tenth Amendment a Waste of Ink?http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/04/24/tenth-amendment-a-waste-of-ink/
Concordia res Parvae CrescuntTue, 03 Mar 2015 18:13:25 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1By: PSS shaft sealshttp://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/04/24/tenth-amendment-a-waste-of-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-932895
Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:44:27 +0000http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12462#comment-932895To circumvent this problem, dye-based inks are made with solvents that dry rapidly or are used with quick-drying methods of printing, such as blowing hot air on the fresh print.
]]>By: Stephen Parrishhttp://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/04/24/tenth-amendment-a-waste-of-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-930623
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:44:52 +0000http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12462#comment-930623I like the way you described that.
]]>By: onetentherhttp://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/04/24/tenth-amendment-a-waste-of-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-930601
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 01:00:31 +0000http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12462#comment-930601Even without the tenthamendment the federal government is still limited to the powers it has and states still face the same restrictions on them that happen to be stated in the constitution. It doesn’t change the constitution itself. It doesn’t grant any new powers to the federal government nor does it place any more restrictions on states or individuals. It simply restates the relationship between federal, state, and the people.
]]>By: WilliamSchoolerhttp://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/04/24/tenth-amendment-a-waste-of-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-930599
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:41:44 +0000http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12462#comment-930599Here we are back to words and interpretations versus reason and meaning of life.

Why have Sovereign independent states? Why have Republics? What have a constitution? Why have limited Government by Liberty? Why have independence?

Because they all support Life in a Republic system or way of life that allows growth and knowledge which was lessons learned in opposition to the Rule way of life which was dominance and abusive by total limitations. When do we understand why it fits us and we fit it by activity?

All these symbols could be rendered useless if they did not represent some activity and the prime activity of life is to what? Create and do? Don’t we know by lessons we have to have Liberty for this to be allowed?

Then the 10nth amendment stands directly in support of my community (my Republic) and allows me to do the activities which allow this community to thrive. It is represented by these symbols to set limits on those put into public office in order to regulate them and allow us in each community this activity without suppression.

So the interpretation becomes outright stupidity and serves no purpose but a way to divert from the limits within it.
]]>By: Bob Greensladehttp://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/04/24/tenth-amendment-a-waste-of-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-930597
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 03:53:57 +0000http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12462#comment-930597The Tenth Amendment cannot be an afterthought because the principle enumerated in the Amendment is a truism and one of the fundamental principles of the Constitution.

In October of 1787, less than one month after the proposed constitution was signed in the Federal Convention, James Wilson, a Federalist from Pennsylvania, explained the proposed constitution and answered some of the criticisms being leveled against it:

“It will be proper…to mark the leading discrimination between the State constitutions and the Constitution of the United States. When the people established the powers of legislation under their separate governments, they invested their representatives with every right and authority which they did not in explicit terms reserve…if the frame of government is silent, the jurisdiction is efficient and complete. But in delegating federal powers, another criterion was necessarily introduced, and the congressional power is to be collected, not from tacit implication, but from the positive grant expressed in the instrument of the union. Hence, it is evident, that in the former case everything that is not reserved is given; but in the latter the reverse of the proposition prevails, and everything that is not given is reserved.”

As stated by Wilson, under the Constitution, as originally written, everything not given was reserved. This principle exists independent and irrespective of the subsequent adoption of the Tenth Amendment. Thus, the Tenth Amendment is a restatement and constitutional enumeration of a fundamental principle.