NCDC transitioned to the nClimDiv dataset on Thursday, March 13, 2014. This was coincident with the release of the February 2014 monthly monitoring report. For details on this transition, please visit our public FTP site and our U.S. Climate Divisional Database site.

On a broad scale, the 1980s and 1990s were characterized by unusual wetness with short periods of extensive droughts, the 1930s and 1950s were characterized by prolonged periods of extensive droughts with little wetness, and the first decade of the 2000s saw extensive drought and extensive wetness
(moderate to extreme drought graphic,
severe to extreme drought graphic).

there were two epicenters of extreme (D3) to exceptional (D4) drought within this large moderate to severe (D2) drought area — one located in the California-Nevada-Oregon region and the other in the Southern Plains centered in northern Texas and adjacent Oklahoma; and

Percent area of the CONUS in moderate to exceptional drought, January 4, 2000 to present, based on the U.S. Drought Monitor.

Palmer Drought Index

The Palmer drought indices measure the balance between moisture demand (evapotranspiration driven by temperature) and moisture supply (precipitation). The Palmer Z Index depicts moisture conditions for the current month, while the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI) and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) depict the current month's cumulative moisture conditions integrated over the last several months.
While both the PDSI and PHDI indices show long-term moisture conditions, the PDSI depicts meteorological drought while the PHDI depicts hydrological drought. The PDSI map shows less severe and extensive drought in the West and parts of the Plains than the PHDI map because the meteorological conditions that produce drought are not as long-lasting as the hydrological impacts.

Standardized Precipitation Index

The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) measures moisture supply. The SPI maps here show the spatial extent of anomalously wet and dry areas at time scales ranging from 1 month to 24 months.

The SPI maps illustrate how moisture conditions have varied considerably through time and space over the last two years.
January and the last 2 to 3 months have been dry across the Far Northern Plains to Tennessee Valley and Central to Northern Appalachians, with the dryness extending to 6 months in places.
Parts of the Southeast were dry at the 6 to 9 month time scales.
Most of the Southern Plains were wet during January but parts were dry, with this mixed pattern extending out to 6 months. Dryness begins to dominate at the 12 to 24 month time scales.
Across much of the West, January was very dry, but heavy precipitation in December and earlier in 2014 resulted in near normal conditions at the 2 to 12 month time scales — except for central California, which was dry at most time scales. Dryness becomes dominant across the West at 24 months.

Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index

The SPI measures water supply (precipitation), while the SPEI (Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index) measures the combination of water supply (precipitation) and water demand (evapotranspiration as computed from temperature). Warmer temperatures tend to increase evapotranspiration, which generally makes droughts more intense.

1-month SPEI for current month.

1-month SPI for current month.

Temperatures were unusually warm in the West during January. Normally that would increase evapotranspiration and make drought conditions worse. But since this is the winter and temperatures are normally low, the effect of the warm temperature anomalies was muted but it still made a noticeable difference in the SPEI and SPI in California, Oregon, and Nevada.
When the entire year is considered, the record warm temperatures in the West significantly intensified drought conditions when the 12-month SPEI is compared to the SPI.

12-month SPEI for current month.

12-month SPI for current month.

Agricultural, Hydrological, and Meteorological Indices and Impacts

USDA western states mountain snow water content

USGS monthly streamflow percentiles

Drought conditions were reflected in numerous agricultural, hydrological, and other meteorological indicators, both observed and modeled.

Regional Discussion

Hawaii:January 2015 was drier than normal across Hawaii. The last 2 to 3 months have been predominantly drier than normal. Even with the rainfall from October 2014 and earlier, the last 4, 6, and 7 months averaged drier than normal at most stations. The precipitation anomaly pattern was mixed at 10 to 12 and even 24 months, but dryness was dominant at 36 months.
The dryness was reflected in below-normal streamflow on some of the islands.
On the USDM map, moderate drought expanded to cover nearly half (46.6 percent) of the state, reflecting the persistently low precipitation as well as the continued low reservoir situation in central Molokai and the Upcountry Maui area.

Puerto Rico:January was drier than normal for north central Puerto Rico and areas in the east and southeast, while the southwest was mostly wetter than normal. A similar pattern is evident at the 3-month time scale. Dryness is more widespread in the north, east, and southeast at the 2- and 4-month time scales and less widespread at 6 months. Streamflow is mostly near normal with some low streams in the east.
On the February 3rd USDM map, abnormal dryness continued for about 3 percent of Puerto Rico.

California had the fourth driest January, with January 2015 marking the fifth consecutive January that was drier than normal. January 2015 was the fifth driest January for Oregon and marked the third consecutive drier-than-normal January. Wyoming had the tenth driest January; most of the Januaries for the last 15 years have been below to slightly below the long-term average. Winter is the dry season for the Great Plains, but January 2015 ranked as the eighth driest January for Nebraska and was the fourth consecutive drier-than-normal January.

A variable pattern characterized the precipitation ranks at the longer time scales. Six states (in the Southern Plains, Mississippi Valley, and Northeast) ranked in the driest third of the historical record for August 2014-January 2015, while two states (Oklahoma and West Virginia) were that dry for the last twelve months (February 2014-January 2015). More notable for the last six to twelve months were the number of states ranking in the wet third of the historical record and those in the West having record warm temperatures.

As described by the High Plains Regional Climate Center, most of the region experienced below normal temperatures the first half of the month, while the last half of the month was well above normal. Ultimately, monthly average temperatures were at or above normal for the region. Overall, it was a fairly dry month across the High Plains region as most of the region received less than 50 percent of normal precipitation and only a few isolated areas received at least 150 percent of normal precipitation. With the exception of the mountainous areas, typical liquid equivalent precipitation for the month of January is less than an inch across the region. With this in mind, even with little to no precipitation, deficits do not build quickly over the winter months. Conversely, precipitation totals at the higher end of the spectrum typically only contribute a small amount to the annual totals.

According to the USDM, there were only slight changes to drought conditions over the past month. For much of the High Plains region, drought improvements or developments are not usually expected as this is typically the driest season of the year. Over the past month, the total area in drought (D1-D4) increased to just over 12 percent with moderate drought conditions (D1) expanding across eastern North Dakota. Drought conditions in South Dakota and across the southern part of the region, in Colorado and Kansas, remained largely unchanged. However, abnormally dry conditions (D0) expanded eastward in Kansas and Nebraska, and also across western Colorado and into southern Wyoming. A major winter storm at the end of the month brought rain and snow to portions of Nebraska and Kansas, so a contraction of abnormally dry conditions may occur there. Although drought conditions have eased or have been completely eliminated over much of the High Plains region, impacts can still be felt. In the spring of 2014, enrollment for Livestock Forage Disaster Assistance began under the 2014 Farm Bill. This allows for the retroactive coverage of losses from 2012 and 2013, and also 2014. According to the USDA, over $2.7 billion in payments have already gone out. The states with the most payments included Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri. Nebraska producers received payments of $512.89 million, while Kansas producers received payments of $461.26 million. These figures cover the time period of October 2011 to December 2014.

As explained by the Southern Regional Climate Center, with the exception of northern and central Oklahoma, January was a slightly cooler than normal month across the Southern region. It was a drier than normal month for all states in the Southern region except for Texas, and Louisiana. Counties in western Tennessee and eastern Arkansas received only between 25 to 50 percent of normal, while surrounding counties faired only slightly better with totals ranging between 50-75 percent of normal. Similar anomalies were also observed throughout most of Oklahoma. Precipitation totals were near to slightly above normal across much of Louisiana and central Arkansas. Conversely, conditions were quite wet in Texas, with a bulk of the stations in the state reporting over 150 percent of normal. Many stations in the Trans Pecos climate division reported over twice the monthly expectation.

Drought conditions did not change much over the past month. Areas of northern Texas and southern Oklahoma are still experiencing extreme and exceptional drought. Similarly, counties in south central Texas are still categorized as moderate to extreme drought. Dry conditions along the Arkansas and Tennessee border resulted in some expansion of moderate drought. In a positive turn of events with respect to the ongoing lingering drought in Texas, The Houston Chronicle reported that Texas cattle herds are starting to rebound. The article reported that bovine inventories in the state had hit a 48-year low in 2014, but a report by the USDA has numbers increasing by as much 6 percent as of January, 2015. In Texas, the cold weather and winter storms created some havoc with the harvesting of cotton. Frozen precipitation and high humidity have kept the cotton yields idle which could cause problematic delays in harvesting. Soil moisture remained good in the Lower Valley due to their wetter-than-normal season but in the northern parts of Texas, soil moisture is declining (Information provided by the Texas Office of State Climatology).

As summarized by the Midwest Regional Climate Center, January precipitation was below normal for nearly the entire region, while temperatures ranged from 5 degrees F (3 C) above normal in the northwest corner of the Midwest to 5 degrees F (3 C) below normal in the northeast corner of the region. Small areas of southeast Missouri, northern Ohio, and northwest Minnesota were slightly above normal, while the remaining areas were below normal with deficits of 1 inch (25 mm) or more in much of the southern third of the Midwest. Precipitation totals were less than half of normal in parts of Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Kentucky, and Michigan. The dry conditions in the region caused the USDM to expand Abnormally Dry conditions across large swaths of the Midwest in January. The storm that began on the 31st reversed much of this expansion. Despite Abnormally Dry conditions expanding from 17 percent to 40 percent of the region during the month, only about 3 percent of the Midwest was rated in drought as of the January 27th release of the USDM.

As noted by the Southeast Regional Climate Center, mean temperatures in January were near average across much of the Southeast region and precipitation was slightly below normal. The wettest locations were found across portions of central Florida, eastern North Carolina, and Tidewater Virginia, where monthly precipitation departures exceeded 1 to 3 inches (25.4 to 76.2 mm) above normal. The driest locations were found across southwestern Virginia and southern Florida, where monthly precipitation ranged between 5 and 50 percent of normal. Mean temperatures were above average in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands during January, and precipitation was near average for most of the islands.

Little change in drought conditions was noted for the Southeast region during January. The percentage of the region under drought-free conditions (less than D1) remained just above 99 percent from December 30th through January 27th. Moderate (D1) drought conditions persisted across a small portion of coastal Alabama centered on Mobile Bay as well as the extreme western tip of the Florida Panhandle. Agricultural impacts were relatively minimal across the region. Higher yields on winter cabbage were aided by slightly warmer-than-average temperatures across the Florida Panhandle during January. However, canola and carinata (oilseed) fields in southwestern Georgia sustained considerable damage due to unusually cold temperatures at the beginning of the month.

As explained by the Northeast Regional Climate Center, 2015 got off to a cold start in the Northeast. January's average temperature of 20.0 degrees F (-6.7 degrees C) was 3.2 degrees F (1.8 degrees C) colder than normal. All twelve states experienced colder-than-normal temperatures. January ended on the dry side of normal for the Northeast. The region picked up 2.72 inches (69.09 mm) of precipitation, 87 percent of normal. Seven states had a drier-than-normal January, with departures ranging from 72 percent of normal in West Virginia to 93 percent of normal in Connecticut and Maine. For the five wet states, departures ranged from 102 percent of normal in New Hampshire to 145 percent of normal in Delaware (the state's 18th wettest January on record). According to the USDM released on January 8, 11 percent of the Northeast was abnormally dry. Conditions deteriorated in parts of Pennsylvania and New York during the month. By the end of the month, 18 percent of the region was abnormally dry.

As summarized by the Western Regional Climate Center, January was warmer than normal for a majority of the West, with the greatest departures from normal observed in the Great Basin and along the borders between Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming. Persistent high pressure over the West Coast kept California, Oregon, and Nevada drier than normal. Several storms skirted the ridge, delivering above normal precipitation to the Desert Southwest and the northern tier of the West.

Areas that do not typically receive a large portion of their annual precipitation in January saw above normal totals this month. In northeastern New Mexico, Clayton, reported its wettest January in a 118-year record at 1.56 in (40 mm) for the month, 457% of normal. January is typically the driest month of the year at Clayton. Further west, Winslow, Arizona, observed 1.63 in (41mm) this month. This is 1.11 in (28 mm) above normal and the 4th wettest January in a 123-year record, and also roughly 21% of Winslow's annual rainfall. Winslow typically receives only 6% of its annual rainfall in January. In southern Arizona, Tucson observed its 4th wettest January in a 69-year record with 2.54 in (65 mm), 270% of normal. On January 30th, an upper level low-pressure system combined with a warm sub-tropical air mass led to Tucson recording its wettest January day on record at 1.39 in (35 mm). To the north, in Montana, January is typically one of the drier months of the year with normal precipitation totals less than 1 in (25 mm). In the north-central part of the state, Havre receive 1.3 in (33 mm) precipitation, 394% of normal and the 3rd wettest January since records began in 1961. In the southern part of the state, Billings received 227% normal precipitation and also recorded its 8th snowiest January (18.7 in/48 cm) since records began in 1934. The far northern Cascades as well as the northern Rockies accumulated snow this month and reported snow water equivalent (SWE) values slightly below to slightly above normal. The central and southern Rockies saw SWE values in the 75-90% of normal range at the end of the month.

Following a wet December, drier to much drier than normal conditions returned to California, Nevada, and Oregon this month, with precipitation less than 50% of normal across large portions of these states. SWE values in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades were only 20-40% of normal at the end of the month. In California, San Francisco recorded no January precipitation for the first time in its long 167-year record; normal is 4.5 in (114 mm). The previous record for driest January was set last year, 0.06 in (2 mm) in 2014. Sacramento also experienced its driest January on record with a total of 0.01 in (0.3 mm). Records for Sacramento began in 1877. In far northern California, only 1.73 in (44 mm) fell in the gauge at Crescent City. This is 8.66 in (220 mm) below normal and the driest January at Crescent City since records began in 1949. Across the border in Oregon, Klamath Falls recorded 0.4 in (10 mm) in January, 22% of normal and the 5th driest since records began in 1948. Further east, 0.2 in (5 mm) of precipitation were recorded in Elko, Nevada, 18% of normal. Elko typically observes 10.5 in (27 cm) snowfall in January, though only trace snowfall was reported this month. Only 5 other Januaries in Elko's 128-year record have had no measurable snowfall. Southwest Wyoming and northwest Colorado also saw a large area of below normal precipitation this month. Precipitation at Rock Springs, Wyoming, totaled 0.01 in (0.3 mm). This was 2% of normal and the driest January since records began in 1948.

Pacific Islands: According to reports from National Weather Service offices, the Pacific ENSO Applications Climate Center (PEAC), and partners, conditions varied across the Pacific Islands.

The rainfall amounts at most of the primary stations were above the minimum thresholds (4 or 8 inches) required to meet most monthly water needs. The 4- and 8-inch thresholds are important because, if monthly precipitation falls below the threshold, then drought becomes a concern. Koror (with 6.48 inches), Kwajalein (2.33 inches), and Yap (5.86 inches) were below the 8-inch threshold. January marks the second consecutive month that Kwajalein was drier than the 8-inch threshold, while the other two stations were wetter than the 8-inch threshold in December.
Other stations in Micronesia that reported precipitation totals for January include Ulithi (which was wetter than the 8-inch threshold), Rumung (which was at the 8-inch threshold with 7.99 inches of rain), and North Fanif (which received 7.18 inches of rain). Ulithi was drier than the 8-inch threshold in December and November, while North Fanif and Rumung were wetter than the 8-inch threshold in December.

As measured by percent of normal precipitation, Koror and Kosrae were drier than normal in both the short term (three-month time scale, November 2014-January 2015) and long term (12-month time scale, February 2014-January 2015). Guam, Chuuk, Pohnpei, Kwajalein, and Majuro were dry in the short term but wet in the long term. Kapingamarangi and Yap were wet in the short term but dry in the long term. Saipan, Lukonor, and Pago Pago were wetter than normal at both the short and long term time scales.