If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

1. I have said this a dozen times, more assets does not mean better quality and it only seems to add more mediocre layouts..........if I could find something like my Pioneer series or even close to them I would not have had to create them....so with less I made more, my opinion but shared by others as well. Personally I'd rather have a few "Quality" routes/layouts then a bunch of "so so" ones.

2. True more people own TANE but remember TMR17 was created for a niche market of MRR lovers not "route" creators which is why TANE was initially created and exceeds in that department.

3. Sad but probably true since that's where the majority of the revenue comes from.

The real issue is that NV3 should have just made TMR17 as an add on bundle as they do now with SP2 instead of a separate standalone item but what is done is done.

The real issue is that NV3 should have just made TMR17 as an add on bundle as they do now with SP2 instead of a separate standalone item but what is done is done.

The reason is it was conceived as a standalone product as an honor and remembrance to the origins of the Trainz product line, which occurred 15 years before. The earliest concepts and eventual marketing and advertising, on TV no less, was as a model railroad simulator. As the product grew up, it moved away from that direction into what we have today starting with TRS2004, with its interactive industries and passenger stations.