Voice of the Earth and Space Science Community

The same gravitational force responsible for creating tides on Earth could be causing deep quakes on the moon, a new study confirms.

A new analysis of data gathered by the Apollo missions confirms that tidal stress – the gravitational pull of the moon on the Earth and of the Earth on the moon – is responsible for causing deep moonquakes, the lunar equivalent of earthquakes.

Seismometers placed on the moon during the Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 16 missions revealed the moon experiences deep moonquakes about 800 to 1,200 kilometers (497 to 746 miles) below its surface roughly every 27 days. Since this is about the time it takes the moon to make a complete circuit around Earth, scientists suspected the moonquakes were a result of tidal stress, but their exact cause remained a source of debate.

A new study in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, combined readings from two different seismometers placed on the moon during the Apollo missions in a new way. Using this technique, researchers analyzed 131 moonquakes occurring from 1969-1977 from the three most active moonquake sites and confirmed they are likely caused by built-up tidal stress on the moon.

Geometric configuration of Apollo seismic stations and deep moonquake source regions. The lunar globe was taken from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC)coutresy of NASA, and Apollo stations and deep moonquake nests were marked by the study’s authors.Credit: NASA and Kawamura et al/Journal of Geophysical Research/AGU

The tidal force causes Earth and its oceans to bulge out on the side closest to the moon and the side farthest from the moon. These bulges of water are high tides. On the moon, these same forces are occurring, causing a small-scale distortion of the entire planet, which scientists have named a solid-body tide. These solid-body tides create faults or cracks on the moon, which rub against each other when tidal stress builds up and result in moonquakes.

Reanalyzing old data

Like Earth, the moon has a crust, mantle and core, but unlike Earth, the moon doesn’t have tectonic plates, so it doesn’t experience quakes when tectonic plates move into or past each other the way Earth does.

While deep moonquakes are generally only magnitude 2 or smaller, they occur on a monthly basis, whereas quakes occurring along the same fault line on Earth may be decades or centuries apart. Moonquakes also last longer than earthquakes, which typically cease within a few minutes. Since the moon is much drier and cooler than Earth, the vibrations carry for longer, whereas Earth’s more compressible structure acts like a sponge to absorb vibrations.

This view of the north polar region of the Moon was obtained by NASA’s Galileo camera during the spacecraft flyby of the Earth-Moon system on December 7 and 8, 1992.Credit: NASA/JPL

Previous studies of deep moonquakes using the Apollo data were limited, since neither of the two seismic instruments on the moon entirely captured the signals from the moon’s activity—one detected high-frequency seismic activity and the other detected low-frequency seismic activity.

Previous studies using only the readings from one of the seismometers underestimated the stress released by the moonquakes, and could not see the full relationship between tidal stress buildup and the stress released by the quakes, according to Renee Weber, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama who is not affiliated with the new study.

The new study’s authors used a new method that combined signals from the two different instruments. The combined data helped improve researchers’ understanding of the faults where the quakes occur. The researchers were then able to relate stress released during the moonquakes to the buildup of tidal stress over the course of the month, and found the two values agreed. This confirms that the moonquakes are a result of the tidal stress, according to Taichi Kawamura, lead author of the new study and a planetary scientist at the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris who is currently affiliated with the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.

Insight into the moon’s interior

The new study’s findings also suggest the moon’s mantle may be colder than previously thought, according to Weber.

Scientists previously thought the areas of the moon’s interior where deep moonquakes occur were warmer, which would make the faults more supple and malleable. But based on the new study, the moon’s faults would need to be brittle to endure the observed tidal stress and create the recorded seismic readings, meaning they may be colder than previously thought. More research is necessary to explore the implications for the internal temperature and composition of the moon, according to the study’s authors.

The new study also sheds light on what kind of instrumentation is needed for future space missions, such as the InSight mission to Mars scheduled for May 2018, according to Weber.

“They similarly plan to send both a broadband and a short-period instrument, so it’s possible that this same type of technique of signal combination in the frequency domain could be applied to those Insight instruments,” Weber said.

Comments

3 Comments

We should consider the typical mechanisms by which a lunar dynamo would continue and what the confluence of forces would do as the moon became tidal locked with the earth.

The greatest influence on the moon would be in the area closest to the earth. As a result, as the tidal lock occurred the internal areas of the moon with the highest temperature and greatest movement/flow would slowly move toward the point closest to the earth. (Bathtub drain)

This could also be expected to result in the last surface volcanism to occur in the region nearest the earth. In addition, the highest earth dynamo generated magnetic field strength should result in a slight increase in some metals, etc. at that location. From a review of data collected by NASA missions it appears that large deposits of thorium are in that area.

Hey! There has been a question on my mind and I cant seem to find the answer. This blog is the closest to the topic. Maybe you could help. So, I have read about how some apollo missions were causing moonquakes.. Did does moonquakes affect the tides then, if the source is from the moon not the earth, like in this blog? What was the aftermath of that?

AGU Blogs manager Larry O’Hanlon responds: Hello. Thanks for the question. Where did you read that Apollo missions caused moonquakes? Apollo missions placed seismometers on the moon to measure seismic activity there (see https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/15mar_moonquakes), but other than a minor bump from landing (something like the seismic effect of a little Cessna landing at a rural airport), I’ve never heard that the Apollo missions caused moonquakes, nor can I see how they could. As for how moonquakes affect tides on Earth, I’m not an expert, but I believe it’s sort of the other way around: The gravitational tug of the Earth and Sun (a.k.a., “tidal forces”) on the Moon appear to create moonquakes. That’s what this blog post is about. A more extreme example of this kind of tidal churning of a moon is Jupiter’s moon Io. Io’s interior feels the tug of Jupiter as well as the giant planet’s other large moons swinging past, which roils up the interior of Io so much that it is probably not only quivering with Io-quakes, but its innards are in constant volcanic turmoil.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Connect with AGU:

GeoSpace

GeoSpace is a blog on Earth and space science, managed by AGU’s Public Information staff. The blog features posts by AGU writers and guest contributors on all sorts of relevant science topics, but with a focus on new research and geo and space sciences-related stories that are currently in the news.

Subscribe to GeoSpace

Leave this field empty if you're human:

Ideas and opinions expressed on this site are those of the authors and commenters alone. They do not necessarily represent the views of the American Geophysical Union.