Actions for selected content:

Send content to

To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .

To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services
Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.

Previous research has indicated that bilinguals outperform monolinguals in cognitive tasks involving spatial working memory. The present study examines evidence for this claim using a different and arguably more ecologically valid method (the change blindness task). Bilingual and monolingual participants were presented with two versions of the same scenes and required to press a key as soon as they identified the alteration. They also completed the word and alpha span tasks, and the Corsi blocks task. The results in the change blindness task, controlled for group differences in non-verbal reasoning, indicated that bilinguals were faster and more accurate than monolinguals at detecting visual changes. Similar group differences were found on the Corsi block task. Unlike previous findings, no group differences were found on the verbal memory tasks. The results are discussed with reference to mechanisms of cognitive control as a locus of transfer between bilingualism and spatial working memory tasks.

In North America, terrestrial records of biodiversity and climate change that span Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage (MIS) 5 are rare. Where found, they provide insight into how the coupling of the ocean–atmosphere system is manifested in biotic and environmental records and how the biosphere responds to climate change. In 2010–2011, construction at Ziegler Reservoir near Snowmass Village, Colorado (USA) revealed a nearly continuous, lacustrine/wetland sedimentary sequence that preserved evidence of past plant communities between ~140 and 55 ka, including all of MIS 5. At an elevation of 2705 m, the Ziegler Reservoir fossil site also contained thousands of well-preserved bones of late Pleistocene megafauna, including mastodons, mammoths, ground sloths, horses, camels, deer, bison, black bear, coyotes, and bighorn sheep. In addition, the site contained more than 26,000 bones from at least 30 species of small animals including salamanders, otters, muskrats, minks, rabbits, beavers, frogs, lizards, snakes, fish, and birds. The combination of macro- and micro-vertebrates, invertebrates, terrestrial and aquatic plant macrofossils, a detailed pollen record, and a robust, directly dated stratigraphic framework shows that high-elevation ecosystems in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado are climatically sensitive and varied dramatically throughout MIS 5.

Studies measuring inhibitory control in the visual modality have shown a bilingual advantage in both children and adults. However, there is a lack of developmental research on inhibitory control in the auditory modality. This study compared the comprehension of active and passive English sentences in 7–10 years old bilingual and monolingual children. The task was to identify the agent of a sentence in the presence of verbal interference. The target sentence was cued by the gender of the speaker. Children were instructed to focus on the sentence in the target voice and ignore the distractor sentence. Results indicate that bilinguals are more accurate than monolinguals in comprehending syntactically complex sentences in the presence of linguistic noise. This supports previous findings with adult participants (Filippi, Leech, Thomas, Green & Dick, 2012). We therefore conclude that the bilingual advantage in interference control begins early in life and is maintained throughout development.

Let $V$ be a complete nonsingular projective surface defined over an algebraic number field $k$, such that the Picard variety of $V$ is trivial and Pic($\bar{V}$) is torsion-free. Since our main interest is in necessary conditions for $V(k)$ not to be empty, we shall further assume that $V(k_v)$ is non-empty for every completion $k_v$ of $k$. We do not assume that $\bar{V}$ is rational, and indeed the case which primarily interests us is when $V$ is a K3 surface. Our objective is to describe effective ways of computing the Brauer–Manin obstructions to the existence of points on $V$ defined over $k$. Write \[ \hbox{Br}^0 (V) = \{\hbox{Ker}(\hbox{Br}(V)\longrightarrow\hbox{Br}(\bar{V}))\}/\{{\rm Im}({\rm Br}(k)\longrightarrow\hbox{Br}(V))\};\] then it is known that $\hbox{Br}^0(V)$ is isomorphic to ${\rm H}^1(k, \hbox{Pic}(\bar{V}))$, though to the best of our knowledge there is in general no known algorithm for computing either $\hbox{Br}^0(V)$ or this isomorphism. It is generally believed that $\hbox{Br}^0(V)$ contains all the information about the Brauer group Br$(V)$ which is useful in this context. Most of this paper is concerned with computing groups isomorphic to $\hbox{Br}^0(V)$, and with describing in terms of these groups the Brauer–Manin obstructions coming from elements of $\hbox{Br}^0(V)$.

Since its publication in 1982, the National Adult Reading Test
(NART; Revised Version, NART–R) has become a widely accepted
method for estimating premorbid levels of intelligence in
neuropsychological research. However, the assumption that
NART/NART–R performance is relatively independent of brain
damage has been increasingly challenged in recent years. In
a number of conditions, including Alzheimer dementia and
Korsakoff's syndrome, studies have indicated a deterioration
in reading ability, leading to an underestimated premorbid IQ.
In a reaction to these studies, some researchers have advocated
the use of demographic variables as a more suitable foundation
for accurately predicting premorbid intelligence. We addressed
this issue by calculating IQ estimates on the basis of
NART/NART–R, demographic variables, and a combination
of the two approaches and by comparing these with current
WAIS/WAIS–R IQ in patients with Korsakoff's syndrome,
Alzheimer dementia, frontal or temporal lobe lesions, and in
healthy controls. Estimated premorbid IQs did not differ across
groups, whether derived from NART/NART–R or demographic
variables. Those based on NART/NART–R demonstrated higher
correlations with current WAIS/WAIS–R IQ in controls and
patients than those derived from demographic variables. An equation
combining NART scores with demographic variables did not
significantly increase the amount of variance in IQ explained
by NART only, either in patients or controls. The data offer
reassurance regarding the continued use of NART as a valid estimate
of premorbid intelligence in a number of conditions.
(JINS, 2002, 8, 847–854.)

Recommend this

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.