Macho Man Beyond The Valley Of The Dolls

I suppose that it’s the job of every psychologist to analyse the deep and hidden impulses that underscore the actions of men and women. Their job is to enlighten us, to differentiate between what is inherent to our genome, from what we may want to suppress. But psychologists are also men and women, and can be trapped by their own misconceptions and biases.

In his article, entitled, “Feminists think that sexist men are sexier than “woke” men,” online psychologist David Ley, has shown us that not only can psychologists be wrong, but also dangerous. The notion of benevolent sexism (BS) that he defends reminds me of the arguments used by certain young Tunisian women who are against reforming the inheritance laws of their country. They find it reasonable that since men are there to protect and worship them, women must be willing to accept the blatantly patriarchal inheritance laws.

It is important to note that sexism and mysogyny are not identical concepts. (1)

Indeed, sexism and misogyny are not the same, but although the former can exist on its own, it is the condition that leads to the latter. Sexism is an underlying vague and erroneous dogma that women have no place in society, other than the family. Misogyny is just making sure that the dogma is rigorously applied to millions of women, by making sexism a personal vendetta directed against women who dare to exist.

These women are not traitors to other women, they are traitors to themselves.

Women who find sexist men attractive are not being traitors to other women, nor are they naïve women who don’t understand their choices. Instead, they are women who are making rational decisions, accepting tradeoffs. (1)

Ley’s approval of BS is surprising, to say the least. He mentions a tradeoff that the woman is prepared to accept, in order to be “protected” by the man. What he fails to mention is that the tradeoff entails not a loss of independence – which is bad enough – but a loss of an identity that is so entrenched in the psyche of each individual, that it is synonymous with the definition of who we all are. These women are not traitors to other women, they are traitors to themselves.

The question to be asked, before we can pass judgement on the well-foundedness of BS, is exactly what this kind of sexism entails. In a recent study entitled, “Benevolent Sexism and Mate Preferences: Why Do Women Prefer Benevolent Men Despite Recognizing That They Can Be Undermining?” Pelin Gul and Tom Kupfer report the results of a series of investigations that suggest that some women are attracted to BS men, with the benevolence going far beyond opening doors for women and paying dinner bills. I do the former all the time and, as for the dinner bills, my wife always seems to need to go to the ladies, when the bill arrives at the table.

The premise of the investigation is as follows. Given the choice between hostile sexism (HS) outside the comfort of their own homes, women will choose the relative comfort of benevolent sexism, within the confines of their kitchens – not taking into account that neither the homes nor the kitchens belong to the women, in the first place. In a nutshell, thus, hostile sexism is characterised by overtly prejudiced attitudes towards women whom you hate, whilst benevolent sexism comprises a subjectively prejudiced attitude that is masked by the fact that you love and cherish women in the same way you loved and cherished that Action Man you got for your tenth birthday.

We propose that attitudes and behaviors typically included under the rubric of BS are taken as signals by women that a man has characteristics that are desirable in a potential mate; specifically, that he is willing to invest by being protective, providing, and committed. This benevolence as a mate-preference perspective suggests that women may prefer BS men despite knowing that they can be undermining because the desirable aspects of a man’s benevolent attitudes and behaviors outweigh the potential downsides. (2)

Not only do these women know that they will be undermined by macho men, but they also take comfort from this undermining.

Women might approve of BS, therefore, because men with benevolent attitudes and behaviors can maximize women’s benefits by offering what they tend to lack (the provision of material resources) within the gender-role divided society. (2)

It does seem that it is precisely the gender-role divided society that is not only the problem, but also the solution. Has humanity made no advances at all since the days when Mrs Flintstone stayed in her cave looking after the little Flintstones, whilst Mr Flintstone went out happily hunting with his pals, and accidentally discovered fire, and invented the wheel?

I have absolutely no training in psychology, which probably makes me apt to give an unbiased view on the subject. The first question that I ask myself is whether the methodology used in the study is well-founded and credible. It is based on the ambivalent sexism inventory (ASI) to differentiate between hostile and benevolent sexisms, as described by Peter Glick and Susan Fiske.

For the authors, there exists a close link between HS and BS, both sharing three types of behaviours – protective paternalism, complementary gender differentiation, and heterosexual intimacy.

(1) Protective paternalism:

Advocates of dominative paternalism justify patriarchy by viewing women as not being fully competent adults, legitimizing the need for a superordinate male figure. Yet protective paternalism may coexist with its dominative counterpart because men are dyadically dependent on women (because of heterosexual reproduction) as wives, mothers, and romantic objects; thus, women are to be loved, cherished, and protected (their “weaknesses” require that men fulfill the protector-and-provider role). (3)

I’ll be honest – if you asked me whether it was better for a mother to go back to work, just weeks after the birth of her child, I would have serious hesitations. I do believe that, in the first period of his/her life, a baby is in constant need of maternal contact. Having said that, the choice must be left to the mother to make, and no-one else.

(2) Complementary gender differentiation:

Competitive gender differentiation presents a social justification for male structural power. Only men are perceived as having the traits necessary to govern important social institutions. (3)

However, this gender differentiation, used to justify the downgrading of women can actually serve as an excuse to protect them, in a home environment – with the term “protection” being subjectively used by the man, and subjectively perceived by the woman. In this way, when I open a door for a woman, and let her out first, is it because I think that she hasn’t the strength to open the door by herself? Subjectivity also poses a problem, with your idea of “protection” probably being quite different from mine.

(3) heterosexual intimacy:

In my view, this is the most potent source of male ambivalence concerning their relationship with women. For Gilcke and Fiske,

Heterosexuality is, undoubtedly, one of the most powerful sources of men’s ambivalence toward women. Heterosexual romantic relationships are ranked by men (and women) as one of the top sources of happiness in life. (3)

Men’s sexual motivation toward women may be linked with a genuine desire for psychological closeness ( heterosexual intimacy). Although, at their best, heterosexual relationships are the source of euphoric and intimate feelings, romantic relationships between men and women also pose the greatest threat of violence toward women. Men’s dyadic dependency on women creates an unusual situation in which members of a more powerful group are dependent on members of a subordinate group. Sex is popularly viewed as a resource for which women act as the gatekeepers.(3)

Out of interest, I carried out an online ASI test. You can do it too, via this link. Having to answer questions by giving your approval on a scale from 0 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree) can prove difficult. What is the difference between 2 and 3, or 1 and 2?

The types of questions asked are as follows:

Hostile SexismWomen exaggerate problems at work Women are too easily offended Most women interpret innocent remarks as sexist When women lose fairly, they claim discrimination Women seek special favors under guise of equality Feminists are making reasonable demandsFeminists not seeking more power than menWomen seek power by gaining control over men Few women tease men sexuallyOnce a man commits, she puts him on a tight leash Women fail to appreciate all men do for them

Benevolent Sexism

– Protective Paternalism:A good woman should be set on a pedestal Women should be cherished and protected by men Men should sacrifice to provide for women In a disaster, women need not be rescued first

– Complementary Gender Differentiation:Women have a superior moral sensibility Women have a quality of purity few men possess Women have a more refined sense of culture, taste

– Heterosexual Intimacy:Every man ought to have a woman he adores Men are complete without womenDespite accomplishment, men are incomplete without women People are often happy without heterosexual romance

The results I obtained are shown in this table:

I don’t know whether I should be worried about scoring less than the average female. It seems that the score I obtained corroborates my views, described elsewhere, that women should be considered, above all, as human beings. But why isn’t my hostile sexism zero? It could be due to the fact that I think that women get offended too easily, and that not all feminists are making reasonable demands.

According to Gul and Kupfer’s study, many women are attracted to sexist men, even if the latter are “benevolent.” Is it a sort of “fatal attraction,” in a way, with the woman losing more than she thinks, even though she dare not admit it. Can it be that the woman is totally lost by the irresistible allure of a Christian Grey? What is interesting is that feminists are just as much prone to be trapped by BS men, as non-feminists. The other salient point to arise, is that women are much more likely to accept BS men if it leads to a romantic relationship, rather than just occurring on the workplace. Maybe another human phenomenon plays a crucial role. A phenomenon that is not once mentioned in the cited literature, but is described so poetically by Plato – love between a man and a woman defying all forms of logic and reason.

Citations:

(1) David J. Ley – Feminists Think Sexist Men Are Sexier than “Woke” Men – Why do women find sexist men appealing?

(2) Pelin Gul, Tom Kupfer – Benevolent Sexism and Mate Preferences: Why Do Women Prefer Benevolent Men Despite Recognizing That They Can Be Undermining? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 45(1) May 2018 (link in text)

gskaye

Post navigation

One Expat And His Blog

Welcome to CRYSTAL HORIZONS. The blog after the blog before. The "shares" have disappeared, but the posts haven't.
If you think that 2018 was eventful, you ain’t seen nothing yet.
This blog was originally about the EU and Brexit. Understandable because I’m half a British expat living in continental Europe (my other half is French). In my intro page I did mention that this blog is like cheese and will mature, and so it has... It has now acquired a new name - CRYSTAL HORIZONS.
So many things are happening in the world that it’s obvious that not everything revolves around Brexit. My opinions haven’t changed though, and I still think that smashing the EU door is certainly not the political answer to the UK's philosophical dream.
As for the blog, it still revolves around philosophy, politics and has a tinge of satire. Can philosophers and other learned individuals help me understand what the hell is going on?

Take Your Pick

One of the most important philosophical challenges we are facing today is that of intolerance, particularly religious intolerance. Repeated terrorist attacks in France, Belgium and elsewhere, remind us all of how far these intolerant religious believers are prepared to go. A possible explanation of why religious believers react violently when challenged is a phenomenon known as...
Read more

Having left the UK in 1984, I am beginning to wonder if my motherland is not the outward looking and relaxed land that I thought it was. I love the UK, don’t get me wrong. I can assure you that, on the 24th June, I was one of the most upset persons in the EU,...
Read more

Divorce can be a messy and expensive business. In the same way that people don’t get married with the intention of filing a divorce, I’m convinced that the UK didn’t initially join the EU (or European Economic Community, as it then was), in order to cause chaos and leave it. However, at least one notable...
Read more

I thought, at first, that in endorsing the UK parliament’s right to vote for the triggering of Article 50, the High Court ruling was a good thing. Having heard Theresa May’s views that it wouldn’t change her timetable or attitude, and other politicians saying that they were going to vote for Brexit anyway, has made...
Read more

It’s ironic that former prime minister David Cameron put forward a referendum on Europe that now threatens the very nature of the parliamentary democracy that let him propose it in the first place. Of course, whether Cameron had any choice in the matter remains subject for debate. But the fact of the matter is that...
Read more

Have you ever wondered about the origins of the expression “pardon my French”? Some say that it originated in the 19th century and was used as an apology by people who used French words in conversations. Nowadays it’s used apologetically after swearing. How wonderful language can be. I’m sure that Marine Le Pen, leader of...
Read more

It’s that time of year again, where everyone reminisces over what has happened over the year gone by and you get bombarded with reviews of this, that, and the other. Well, I’ve decided to tell you what I think the most important event of 2016 is. And…you’ve guessed it? It’s Leicester City wining the English...
Read more

On December 24th 1951, a group of Catholic clergymen hanged and set on fire a Father Christmas effigy in front of at least 250 children in Dijon, France. Following the incident, the late French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss wrote an article entitled “Le Père Noël supplicié” (“The tortured Father Christmas”) in the literary journal...
Read more

All of us remember the horrifying picture of a 3 year old Syrian boy found lying on a beach. The scene epitomised the situation for ordinary people in Syria. But he and others are no ordinary people. We are. We, including myself, all live in our protected personal bubbles and are only temporarily affected by...
Read more

Shortly after the EU referendum, Theresa May decided to spend a few days in Switzerland. What a coincidence that this country is part of the European Free Trade Area (EFTA), but not the European Economic Area (EEA). EEA/EFTA: RUOK? Complicated? Yes, it sure is. Luckily Google can help me out. Let’s start with the EFTA:...
Read more

“Only one thing: this thickness and this strangeness of the world, that’s the absurd.” Albert Camus On June 16th 2016, the Labour member of Parliament, Jo Cox, was brutally murdered by Thomas Mair, an unemployed gardener. Although the perpetrator had a history of mental illness, he also had ties with extreme right-wing parties,...
Read more

Now that she knows where the bathrooms are in number 10 (I’m assuming that there is more than one), it’s down to business for Theresa May. She really got us going with her stirring speech and, with only a few weeks to go until the dreaded day when she sends THE LETTER to Brussels,...
Read more

On 23rd January, 2017,the Dutch centre-right prime minister Mark Rutte wrote an open letter which was widely published in the national press. As a non-Dutch national, I would like to respond to comments he made in that letter. The present post is based on my previous post written in Dutch. It wasn’t easy for me...
Read more

This week, the UK parliament approved a bill giving Theresa May the authority to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, in accordance with the EU referendum result on June 23rd last year. Seven months on, and the fate of EU nationals living and working in the UK, as well as British nationals in other...
Read more

2016 was marked by a sharp rise in populist politics and has culminated in the UK vote to leave the EU and the election of Donald Trump in the US. In 2017, the French presidential election race has already been marred by a political scandal involving the right-wing candidate and presidential front-runner, François Fillon. He is...
Read more

In October 2016 the former UK premier Tony Blair wrote an opinion article in The New European newspaper. He appealed to the UK not to rush into Brexit without seriously taking into account the consequences of such a decision. Tony Blair compared Brexit with a house move. For the former prime minister, it is only...
Read more

An international arrest warrant has been ordered for the former Peruvian president Alejandro Toledo amidst allegations that he received up to $20m in bribes from the Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht. The former president would, in return, have granted a lucrative contract to build a transoceanic highway between Brazil and the Peruvian coast. Toledo would not...
Read more

The fact that Theresa May, the UK prime minister, made an unprecedented appearance in the House of Lords speaks volumes over her respect for parliamentary democracy. It is now patently clear that the EU referendum that took place on June 23rd 2016 was flawed ever since the former prime minister, David Cameron, promised the vote...
Read more

Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time once again for “Call My Bluff”. And here’s your host, Theresa May. Hello everybody, and welcome to this edition of “Call My Bluff”, a panel game in which three contestants give me a definition of a political word that I have never heard of. I must guess the true...
Read more

The title of this post paraphrases something Margaret Thatcher said during the 1980 Conservative Party Conference. Having been asked on several occasions by the media whether she would perform a U-turn concerning her economic and social policies, she had always replied that she wasn’t one to change her mind. At the conference she spoke a...
Read more

Books will soon be obsolete in schools. Scholars will soon be instructed through the eye. It is possible to teach every branch of human knowledge with the motion picture. Our school system will be completely changed in ten years. – Thomas Edison – 1913 You’ve got to give Thomas Edison credit for his vision. Of...
Read more

Sometimes by pure accident you read about an act of violence in the news, that fills you with such disgust and hate for the perpetrators that you just feel like shouting your anger to the world. Today, quite by chance, I came across this news story from the Dutch television news website. The act of...
Read more

In prohibiting entry to two senior Turkish politicians, the Netherlands has sparked a serious dispute with Turkey. The decision not to allow Turkish politics to be officially expressed on Dutch soil can only be justified if the decision to do so is based on moral principles that can be as universally applied as possible, and...
Read more

The result of the Dutch parliamentary elections, that took place on Wednesday 15th March, is a victory for the current prime minister, Mark Rutte. Although his party, the VVD, remain the largest political party in the Netherlands despite losing 8 parliamentary seats, Mark Rutte may face difficulties in forming a working coalition. It is probable...
Read more

March 29th 2017 will be remembered as the day the UK officially triggered Article 50 of the European Constitution, signifying a two year slog to disentangle itself from the European Union. I have no intention of browsing the glorifying headlines on the front pages of the UK tabloids. I’ll let the Brexiteers rejoice in their...
Read more

Together we stand, and together we wait And there was I, thinking that we were utterly alone in our battle as UK expats, to avoid being cast into oblivion by the forces of evil from both sides of the channel. It now appears that an entire dependency is about to suffer the same fate as...
Read more

It rains on the roof, like it rains on the stairs My grandmother’s house was no ordinary house. It was a mountain chalet on the outskirts of Nice, in the South of France. The colour of its turquoise entrance to the garden, and ochre yellow walls, had nothing to do with turquoise, and even less...
Read more

The British Press: Responsible but not guilty? When the offices of the French satirical journal Charlie Hebdo were gruesomely attacked in January 2015, the world was shocked, and rightly so. The attack focused on the press, one of the most sacred institutions of our democracies. The terrorists also challenged something that most of us...
Read more

I’ll be honest with you. Before writing this post, I had no idea what a “LGBT person” actually was. “In what sort of world is this guy living?”, I hear you ask. Well, I live in the same world as you, but the meaning of this dreadful label that has been tagged on the shoulders...
Read more

Mes enfants, it’s fast approaching squeaky bum time in France, with the first round of the 2017 presidential election due on the 23rd April. The political situation in France is, as I see it, similar to that of 2002, when far-right candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen, father of present-day Marine, reached the second round to everybody’s...
Read more

If I talked to you about a country that just had a dubiously run referendum, the result of which was so close, as to be invalid for such a huge constitutional change, you would probably be thinking of Turkey. If I then told you that the leader of this country will organise elections with the...
Read more

A series of short posts highlighting interesting points arising during the final countdown to the French presidential election. (I) – Storm in a “Whirlpool” It’s what we call “l’entre deux tours” (between the two rounds) of the French presidential election. And I can just sit back behind my computer and relax. All I...
Read more

Plato And Jeremy Corbyn: “Whose Idea Was This Anyway?” With the June election rapidly approaching, I’m going to dedicate a post to the current leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn. I know that my views don’t matter one iota, and, what’s more, I cannot even vote. Well, that should make you listen...
Read more

(II) Marine Le Pen’s Splitting Headache Over Europe The situation at the Whirlpool plant, situated in the northern town of Amiens, underscores the nature of the combat between Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron. The fact that the American owners want to relocate the plant in Poland, is, for Le Pen, the epitome of...
Read more

(III) Evolution And Decomposition Of French Politics The fact that there is no Republican candidate in the second round of the French presidential elections, coupled with the disintegration of the French socialists, underscores the fact that the French political landscape has undergone a seismic shift, for the first time in the long history of...
Read more

(IV) Emmanuel Macron’s Late Night Out Up to now, compared to Marine Le Pen, I’ve been quite nice to Emmanuel Macron. Well, one thing’s for sure: nobody’s perfect I was fortunate enough to attend the Euro 2000 football championship final between Italy and France, that took place in Rotterdam. I was standing in the midst...
Read more

Joan of Arc, having liberated France from English occupation in the 15th century, has become a symbol of ultra-nationalism expressed by the French National Front Party. The Little Prince, written by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, is a poetic tale, in which a pilot stranded in the desert meets a young prince fallen to Earth from a...
Read more

From time to time, there is such a build-up to a mid-week football match, that you cannot wait for the Wednesday night. The build-up to this week’s French presidential debate promised a night of high drama, philosophical insights and antipodal ideologies. Instead, I was forced to watch the debate on my iPad, my son having...
Read more