Architecture of Modern Propaganda by Zahir Ebrahim

First
Published May 31, 2009 | Last Updated Tuesday, March 11, 2014
10:00 pm

Caption
The Public Mind in the Making (Book cover 1928)

Edward
Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud, began his seminal 1928 book
simply titled Propaganda, with these ominous words:

'The
conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and
opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an
invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas
suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.' --- Edward
Bernays, 1928, pg.1, Propaganda

Aldous
Huxley, on the 30th anniversary of his own seminal 1931 allegorical
novel Brave New World, made the following dreadful
observations in the very opening segment of his talk on the Ultimate
Revolution upon which mankind and modernity are perilously perched:

'You
can do everything with bayonets except sit on them! If you are going
to control any population for any length of time you must have some
measure of consent. It's exceedingly difficult to see how pure
terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly
long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an
element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to
what is happening to them. Well, it seems to me that the nature of
the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely
this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of
techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have
always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people
actually to love their servitude! This is the, it seems to me the
ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we say.' --- Aldous Huxley,
1962 speech at UC Berkeley, minute 04:06

In
order to understand how the comprehension of Edward Bernays and
Aldous Huxley, though both long dead, still manifests itself in these
times, we must begin with the Mighty Wurlitzer.

However,
first, a gestalt shift in perspective is necessary. Please
stare at the image below for a few moments of reflection before
proceeding.

Caption
Perspective: Oh what a difference even a slight shift can make!
(Image source)

What
is the 'Mighty Wurlitzer'?

It
used to be the honorific of Frank Wisner, the first chief of
political warfare for the Central Intelligence Agency, used to
describe the C.I.A.’s plethora of front organizations and
newsmedia stooges that he was capable of playing (like a great organ
with many keyboards) for synthesizing any propaganda tune that was
needed for the day. See Operation Mockingbird (
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKmockingbird.htm
) (PDF).

The
fact that such an omnipresent Message-Machine is not ancient history
but very much current affairs, is underscored by this NYT headline
“Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”,
Sunday, April
20, 2008
( http://tinyurl.com/6qhgfg
). Also see Jessica
Lynch
Media Myth-Making in Iraq War during Operation “Iraqi
Freedom” in Further
Study.

Caption
The Mighty Wurlitzer Organ: Metaphor for the Multi-Modal Propaganda
Message-Machine which can Play Many Perception-Molding Tunes
Simultaneously to Make the Public Mind

Therefore,
today, I use the term 'Mighty Wurlitzer' as a metaphor to
pluralistically refer to the same message-machine, i.e., the
intelligence apparatus for manufacturing consent and controlling
dissent, and its concomitant conscious manipulation of peoples'
thoughts, feelings, actions and in-actions, in order to serve the
primacy interests of the behind the scene governing oligarchy. The
latter are, invariably, also the de facto owners of the complete
messaging-system now even more globally ubiquitous than when Frank
Wisner played the world for a fool.

This
'grand organ' is now able to even more effectively synthesize,
implant, and reinforce, all the right set of beliefs (myths) among
the entire world's public – by suitably combining 'events' with
imaginative 'expos' writing – which appropriately primes the
world populations to acquiesce to the oligarchic agendas. While
playing this orchestra is now an integral part of all state-craft,
its major musical themes are entirely determined by the behind the
scenes owners of the system. While some might refer to the underlying
techniques as propaganda and psy-ops, 'Mighty Wurlitzer' singularly
captures the messaging-system controlled under a unified purpose of
command which is both highly compartmentalized and cellularized. Only
the Mighty Wurlitzer knows the entire tune.

What
this means is that not all who willingly cooperate with the Mighty
Wurlitzer in synchronistically humming its themes are knowingly being
purveyors of its myths and deception. Many of its most shrill echoers
are often well intentioned functionaries who are fed different
motivating myths at different levels in the hierarchy –
sometimes the lie is different at every level – such that it
suitably motivates each according to their own predilection,
professional station, and mission statement.

The
Mighty Wurlitzer operates on the core premise which has been
empirically shown to psychologically motivate most human action. That
premise was elegantly captured in the following insightful
observation made by the so called “Terrorism
Study Group”,
that

“'Public
Assumptions' Shape Views of History: Such presumptions are beliefs
(1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true
with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant
political community. The sources for such presumptions are both
personal (from direct experience) and vicarious (from books, movies,
and myths).”

Successfully
implanting such presumptions and pre-suppositions among any group is
to motivate its overall actions in accordance with those implanted
beliefs. Thus, many intelligent peoples for whom it is otherwise
inexplicable to understand why they persist in 'United We Stand' with
absurdities, are motivated to react sympathetically to those
absurdities.

The Secret Team

To
barely catch a glimpse of how it's partially done, the following
description by Col. Fletcher Prouty from the Preface to the first
edition of his 1973 book “The
Secret Team”
is instructive (PDF
book):

'There
is another category of writer and self-proclaimed authority on the
subjects of secrecy, intelligence, and containment. This man is the
suave, professional parasite who gains a reputation as a real
reporter by disseminating the scraps and "Golden Apples"
thrown to him by the great men who use him. This writer seldom knows
and rarely cares that many of the scraps from which he draws his
material have been planted, that they are controlled leaks, and that
he is being used, and glorified as he is being used, by the inside
secret intelligence community.

Allen
Dulles had a penchant for cultivating a number of such writers with
big names and inviting them to his table for a medieval style
luncheon in that great room across the hall from his own offices in
the old CIA headquarters on the hill overlooking Foggy Bottom. Here,
he would discuss openly and all too freely the same subjects that
only hours before had been carefully discussed in the secret inner
chambers of the operational side of that quiet Agency. In the hands
of Allen Dulles, "secrecy" was simply a chameleon device to
be used as he saw fit and to be applied to lesser men according to
his schemes. It is quite fantastic to find people like Daniel
Ellsberg being charged with leaking official secrets simply because
the label on the piece of paper said "top secret," when the
substance of many of the words written on those same papers was
patently untrue and no more than a cover story. Except for the fact
that they were official lies, these papers had no basis in fact, and
therefore no basis to be graded top secret or any other degree of
classification. Allen Dulles would tell similar cover stories to his
coterie of writers, and not long thereafter they would appear in
print in some of the most prestigious papers and magazines in the
country, totally unclassified, and of course, cleverly untrue.

In
every case, the chance for complete information is very small, and
the hope that in time researchers, students, and historians will be
able to ferret out truth from untruth, real from unreal, and story
from cover story is at best a very slim one. Certainly, history
teaches us that one truth will add to and enhance another; but let us
not forget that one lie added to another lie will demolish
everything. This is the important point. Consider the past half
century. How many major events -- really major events -- have there
been that simply do not ring true? How many times has the entire
world been shaken by alarms of major significance, only to find that
the events either did not happen at all, or if they did, that they
had happened in a manner quite unlike the original story?'

Coldly
implicit in Col. Prouty's afore-quoted empirical statement: “and
the hope that in time researchers, students, and historians will be
able to ferret out truth from untruth, real from unreal, and story
from cover story is at best a very slim one”, is the
underlying Machiavellian modus operandi of buying time for sewing
faits accomplis (new unalterable realities on the ground). By
straight-jacketing all public discourse in deception when its timely
revelation and unraveling can in fact derail the exercise of
hegemony, new realities are constructed in the guise of responding to
catastrophic events while the shell-shocked people remain dazed,
confused, and frightened. They accept any solution offered by the
authority figures as Americans did for instance in the aftermath of
9/11 when the catastrophic act of terrorism tore their world asunder.
Ex post facto, and years down the road, separating myths and
falsehoods from the calculus of hegemony will still remain only an
academic exercise entirely irrelevant to reversing the faits
accomplis already sewn! For Col. Prouty to not recognize this rather
straightforward fact of the matter, the key modus operandi of
Machiavelli for constructing new unalterable reality on the ground,
as he nonchalantly observed the above quoted statement says something
about the spymaster himself. See Convince
People of Absurdities and get them Acquiescing to Atrocities: The
Enduring Power of Machiavellian Political Science
( http://tinyurl.com/historys-actors-fait-accompli
). Also see Unlayering
the Middle East War Agenda: Making Sense of Absurdities
( http://tinyurl.com/unpeeling-lies
).

Wikileaks
has always been a rather transparent Mighty Wurlitzer ops. It is
trivial to see through the absurdity of its protected existence
despite it promoting itself as being a sort of dissenting watchdog
upon empire. And therefore, ostensibly, being inimical to its
unbridled quest for “full spectrum dominance”. Just
like Al Jazeera television based in Qatar, which too, absurdly
enough, is permitted to function unhindered in the same nation as
America's CENTCOM headquarters.

Would
it not be trivial for an armed to the teeth National Security State
waging perpetual wars on civilians from Afghanistan to Iraq to
Pakistan to Palestine to take-out either apparatus rather trivially
if they were troublesome to its primacy and geostrategic imperatives?
And that may happen once the useful idiots have outlived their
utility, for he who sups with the devil must have a long spoon!

The
reason each is allowed to function is of course social engineering,
the sine qua non for waging modern warfare upon civilian populations
by way of deception. It spans the entire gamut of engineering
consent. From mantra creation in the mainstream, and diabolically
controlling dissent in order to control all opposition in the
dissentstream, to actually fabricating the plainly visible pretexts
(such as acts of terror) which can naturally ripen the conditions for
the mantra of “clash of civilizations” to be
called real in order to sustain the otherwise untenable “imperial
mobilization”.

Backed
by the Mighty Wurlitzer's compositions, inflicting
state terror upon civilian populations as
counter-insurgency, and military invasions of defenseless third-world
nations for imagined or contrived threats in “preemptive
self-defense”, automatically create and promote natural
resistance among the victims thus breeding a self-fulfilling
prophecy.

The
director of the CIA, Michael Hayden, called this modus operandi of
self-fulfilling prophecy, “tickling”
the enemy: “We use military operations
to excite the enemy, prompting him to respond. In that response we
learn so much”.

Zbigniew
Brzezinski most succinctly summed up the core political motivation
for resorting to such Machiavellianess in
his 1996 book The Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and
Its Geostrategic Imperatives: “Democracy is inimical to
imperial mobilization”. (see Brzezinski's
full quote below)

This,
all this, is the real fact of the matter that makes the Mighty
Wurlitzer so indispensable in military
strategy. This is once again underscored by the April
20, 2008
NYT article mentioned at the very beginning, “Behind
TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”.

How
can one tell manufactured reportage and fabricated leaks that are ab
initio designed “to promote a self-fulfilling prophecy”
from the real facts of the matter when it is most pertinent to
averting its fait accompli?

How
can one see through the psyops of the Mighty Wurlitzer?

As
daunting as it might appear to the mainstream television watcher, it
is in fact rather straightforward for those unencumbered by blind
faith in governments and its statecraft.

Just
look for the core-lies and unquestioned axioms of empire that are
typically retained in the “leaks” and reportage which, in
order to sound credible, often openly expose what is mostly already
known anyway or judiciously employ some variation of “Limited
Hangout”
wrapped in a veneer of dissent, 'freedom of the press', and often
accompanied by the facade of angst and opposition from the state.

Furthermore,
look for some of the lauded dissent names rushing to support the
Limited Hangout – just as it was with Daniel Ellsberg for his
infamous Pentagon Papers – to afford a veneer of
legitimacy to the whistleblowing revelations of supposed
state-secrets having caused some great harm to the state. The
extravagance enacted in the mainstream media, alternately making
heroes of the whistleblowers and demonizing them, is a giveaway to
the circus show being enacted for plebeian consumption.

For,
it matters not which side one takes, as both sides are patently
false, crafted of calculated omissions and half-truths that retain
core-lies, right out of the text book of the Technique
of Infamy
: invent two lies and keep the public busy debating which of them
is true!

The
role of crafty omissions in fabricating propaganda was best captured
by Aldous Huxley in his Preface to Brave New World thusly:

‘The
greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing
something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still
greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. By
simply not mentioning certain subjects, by lowering what Mr.
Churchill calls an “iron curtain” between
the masses and such facts or arguments as the local political bosses
regard as undesirable, totalitarian propagandists have influenced
opinion much more effectively than they could have done by the most
eloquent denunciations, the most compelling of logical rebuttals.
But silence is not enough. If persecution, liquidation and the other
symptoms of social friction are to be avoided, the positive sides of
propaganda must be made as effective as the negative.’ —
Aldous Huxley, Preface (circa 1946) to Brave New World, 1931, Harper,
pg. 11

To
uncover omissions in a discourse is very difficult for the public who
do not often have command over the domain in which the falsehoods are
being perpetuated. As the psychological insight already quoted above
from the Terrorism Study Group betrays, “'Public
Assumptions' Shape Views of History. Such presumptions are beliefs
(1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true
with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant
political community.”

Which
is why inculcating ignorance, especially political-historical
ignorance pertaining to international relations, and being made
trusting of authority figures and the state, are the pre-requisites
for any vile propaganda to succeed! A well bred lack of skepticism to
authority figures, to experts in scientific disciplines, and to
dissenting chiefs playing controlled opposition, thus becomes the
heart of social engineering for 'United We Stand'.

This
surfeit of blind trust in authority is what is ultimately harvested
by the Mighty Wurlitzer. For a skeptical public, the tunes of the
Mighty Wurlitzer would fall on very deaf ears and public governance
for private agendas would be well-nigh impossible in democratic
nations. This is qualitatively no different than the power exercised
by the religious clergy upon their faithful flock in any religion.
Except that modernity has perniciously replaced them with
multi-faceted secular clergies, the “experts”, each
demanding obedience from its own 'United We Stand' trusting flock in
all aspects of modern life.

This
is also why “leaking” information from “experts”
and “insiders” commands such a premium in Machiavellian
democratic statecraft. When used judiciously so as not to dilute its
impact, it can herd the flock in pretty much any direction that is
desired.

As
further empirically evidenced in the forensic analysis presented
here, these so called whistleblowing of leaky buckets also
succeed in accomplishing two important elements of statecraft:

vicariously
reinvigorate in the short-term public memory, the already
established-by-fiat facts and core-axioms of empire;

establish
new convenient facts on the ground which are subsequently accepted
as revealed gospel truths because of the already established
thought-stream by the scholars of empire that when something is held
in secret or is classified and subsequently declassified, or is
prematurely leaked to the public, that it must contain some genuine
“state secrets”, and never red herrings. Such
thought-streams enable the directives of NSC 10/2 for plausible
deniability (and those like it which we do not know about) to be
trivially impressed upon the public mind (see Anatomy
of Conspiracy
Theory).
These revelations of presumed “state-secrets”
subsequently become the new unquestioned backdrops for both state
policies and public discourses – the new “doctrinal
motivations” – with copious help from the Mighty
Wurlitzer's refined machinery.

This
enables the successful deployment of already pre-planned policy
prescriptions which craftily impel the various incantations of
hegemony forward in baby-steps. Both, domestically by incrementally
clamping down hard on rising discontent in the name of “national
security”, and internationally by continuing to wage unpopular
wars of preemption upon the 'untermenschen'. The infernal enemy has
now been (re)confirmed to exist (despite popular skepticism) since
even empire's own henchmen in their secret documents also affirm that
belief (sic!). Speak of self-servingly suffering from a incestuously
self-reinforced “crippled epistemology”!

The
grandmaster of The Grand Chessboard himself, in his volt
face half-truth laced testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee in 2007, strangely confirmed the deconstruction of the sole superpower's Machiavellian statecraft being
done in this report: “To argue that America is already at
war in the region with a wider Islamic threat, of which Iran is the
epicenter, is to promote a self-fulfilling prophecy.” (see
Brzezinski's
full SFRC quote below)

But
earlier, the same Polish-American Catholic
(see Zbigniew
Brzezinski footnote)
architect of inflicting America's hegemony upon the world, Zbigniew
Brzezinski, in his 1996 book The Grand Chessboard, had
unabashedly examined the need for such invigorations of the public
mind, and the very promotion of self-fulfilling prophecies as a basic
primacy tactic in order to assert American Primacy and Its
Geostrategic Imperatives. As the former National Security Advisor
under President Carter, and think-tank advisor to all subsequent
occupants of the White House without prejudice, a diabolical
strategist for the one-world oligarchic agenda in cahoots with the
international banker David Rockefeller who appointed him the first
executive director of the Trilateral Commission, Brzezinski with his
imposing resume (see Zbigniew
Brzezinski)
betrays a shrewd comprehension of Machiavellian statecraft's reliance
on engineering consent. Here is a snippet for the absolute necessity
of controlling the public mind for “imperial mobilization”:

“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a
populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the
pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except
in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense
of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense
spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among
professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization.” (pgs. 35-36) ;

“Public
opinion polls suggest that only a small minority (13 percent) of
Americans favor the proposition that 'as the sole remaining
superpower, the US should continue to be the preeminent world leader
in solving international problems'. ... Moreover, as America becomes
an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult
to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the
circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external
threat. .... More generally, cultural change in America may also
be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial
power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal
motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.”
(page 211 and onwards, PDF
book)

The
diabolical utility of planting of “'Public
Assumptions' [that] Shape Views of History” and
therefore of current affairs, as the “doctrinal
motivation” which can
create “intellectual commitment”,
and is rewarded by “patriotic gratification”,
in this 'War on Terror' against the vile Militant Islam's torch
bearers, the Islamofascists, cannot escape the careful reader's
attention. It has wonderfully enabled “America's
power, especially its capacity for military intimidation.”

Catastrophic Terrorism

The
Terrorism
Study Group
in fact took up the future foretelling in 1997-1998 where
Brzezinski's self-serving clairvoyance had left off in 1996 with his
pithy diabolical wisdom in The Grand Chessboard:“Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.”
Phil Zelikow, the future 9/11 Commission Executive Director,
led the so called study on Catastrophic
Terrorism.
It presaged, on October 15, 1998, a full three years before 9/11, how
that instinctual aversion of America's democratic public to “imperial
mobilization” would be overcome by the United States
striking out in response to catastrophic terrorism on its soil:

“An
act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of
thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for
hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event
in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and
property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’
fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner
akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse.
Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States
sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against
allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects,
and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either
as other terrorists seek to imitate this great ‘success’
or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible.
Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future
into a ‘before’ and ‘after.’” ---
History
Commons
( http://tinyurl.com/mlzfns )

The
reality du jour exactly matches the doctrinal presaging done years in
advance. America today is a police-state continually “pressing
against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of
suspects”, “the use of deadly force”
is ubiquitous, and is fully engaged in a perpetual war of “imperial
mobilization”, ahem, 'war on terror' against some Ali
Baba, which its own former director of the CIA calls “World War
IV” (see CNN report Thursday,
April 3, 2003: Ex-CIA
director: U.S. faces 'World
War IV').
Its next target: Iran.

Predictably,
with rising skepticism among the public on the utility of pursuing
endless wars against illusive enemies that is making their own nation
go bankrupt, more “harmful leaks” from assets like
Wikileaks will occur, but understandably none which are actually
substantial. Like, blowing the lid on 9/11 as an inside job,
directly naming the top beneficiaries who shorted the Airline stocks
raking in billions, or revealing how BBC came to report the
demolition of WTC-7 a full 20 minutes before it actually transpired,
never mind lending confirmation to any of the forensic detective work
by independent researchers from the debris of 9/11, etceteras. And
the main leaker du jour, Mr. patsy Julian Assange, like Mr. patsy Lee
Harvey Oswald before him, will be sacrificed, perhaps with a new
'lone gunmen' enactment, or perhaps juridically, to lend the hoopla
even more public respectability.

Mr.
Edward Snowden's NSA whistleblowing
story is qualitatively the same and has the same underlying template
of being the Mighty Wurlitzer's asset. Just because something is
stamped “secret” does not make it so. The fact that NSA
is doing full spectrum surveillance of the
world, never mind of the American public, since the invention of
satellite communication, of which smart phones are now the
ubiquitously deployed Trojan horse of data
gathering and data mining, is not really a deep or closely held
secret. It has been public knowledge throughout the world. It is even
popularized by Hollywood movies for decades. Perhaps it is only news
for the American public, I don't know. It is quite a dog and pony
show “miracle” how this young man has “managed”
to elude the entire intelligence apparatus, including the NSA, the
CIA, the DIA, and the drones, of the sole superpower on earth which
spends upwards of a trillion dollars on its defence budget annually,
but cannot capture one “rogue” who outwitted that entire
spy apparatus in “leaking” their most cherished
“secrets”. Thus they must now spend more money and
resources one imagines. Almost parallels with how the same
apparatuses could not interdict Ali Baba wielding box cutter knives
on 9/11, and therefore the state not only had to clamp down harder on
its national security with the Patriot Acts, but also increase its
defence spendings. A Manchurian
Candidate or a useful idiot is irrelevant.
To his own mind this new addition to the whistleblower clique may
well be taking a courageous stand to defend his nation against
enemies, both foreign and domestic, like his predecessor Sibel
Edmonds. But he may also meet the patsy's inevitable fate
someday after his usefulness has expired.

As
for Ms. Sibel Edmonds, the dissent-darling
of America who collects a large body of its brilliant consciences
around her for her FBI whistleblowing, see
The
Sibel Edmonds Story Revisited - How Manufactured Dissent contributes
to War Crimes.
There are more whistleblowers from other
Western intelligence agencies as well, none of them having gained
such outlandish celebrity status or notoriety. It is redundant to
dissect them all since they all are, more or less, automatically
unmasked by the Mighty Wurlitzer's template demonstrated here. They
all, without exception, lie by omission, tell half truth, three
quarter truth, and Limited Hangout variants, to implant or
reinvigorate public beliefs without revealing anything substantial
that can lead to overthrowing the villainy they endeavor to speak out
against. It makes for manufacturing great dissentchiefs. As the final
example, see the “former” CIA's own, Philip
Giraldi, now
leading the so called Council for the National Interest that
routinely speaks out against Israel's influence in Washington,
without ever mentioning who owns the Jewish state, Dismantling
the Fiction of 'Former' and 'Ex' Intelligence – Zahir Ebrahim's
Response to Philip Giraldi.

It’s
the exact same recipe as is used by all the other fabricated and
controlled dissent assets of empire when they are not outright
spinning patent lies, for spinning half-truths requires far more
brilliance. One can already see the main dissent-chiefs of the West,
like the venerable professor Noam Chomsky, anointed by the New York
Times as “arguably the most important intellectual alive”,
and the distinguished Daniel Ellsberg,
excitedly supporting these Wikileaks exposés as if something
ethereal was “revealed in the Sinai” (borrowing
that diction from Elie Wiesel).
Snowden and Edmonds too find great support
among dissentchiefs. What remarkable
narrative control through repeated incestuous self-reinforcement ---
keeping all the core axioms and presuppositions of empire intact!

There
is no detectable difference among Assange,
Snowden, Edmonds, and Ellsberg on the one hand as whistleblowers of
“state secrets”, and Chomsky, Hedges, Brzezinski, Bernard
Lewis, Ron Paul, the Left, the Right, Republicans, Democrats,
Libertarians, Catholics, Protestants, Baptists, Jews, Zionists,
neocons --- on the core lie of empire which
has principally enabled all the rest of the evil that has followed
from that catastrophic day of Operation Canned Goods Redux.
They publicly claim, or believe, in grand unison that America was
attacked on 9/11 by “militant Islam”! The Muslim house
niggers equally rise to applaud that absurd narrative of the
massa. Speak of “crippled epistemology”! The
raison d'être of the Mighty
Wurlitzer.

'Multiple
intelligence reports on the whereabouts of the al-Qaeda leader are
contained among the documents. They disclose publicly for the first
time that bin Laden is thought to be personally overseeing
the work of suicide bombers
and the makers of Taliban roadside bombs which have had a
devastating effect on British and US troops. A secret “threat
report” drafted by the Nato-led International Security
Assistance Force (Isaf) in 2006 locates bin Laden as well as the
Taliban leader Mullah Omar to the Pakistani city of Quetta as well
as several villages on the Afghan border'.
--- UK
Telegraph 27 July 2010.

'I
am aware that there is still some who would question, or even
justify the offense of 911.

But
let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day.

The
victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many
other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.

And
yet Al Qaeeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed
credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to
kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries, to
try to expand their reach.

'In
the summer of 2005, the commission of the European parliament for
security and defense, of which I am a member, was invited to a
special screening created by the Washington Center for Strategic
Studies

We
were asked to watch a film which depicted what would happen in
Europe, if Brussels was hit by a nuclear bomb.

Fifty
thousand deaths, hundred thousand injured. The reactions of various
European governments.

“Good
evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people, and to the
world. The United States has conducted an operation that has killed
Osama Bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda.”' ---
President
Obama, May 1, 2011

The
core-lies retained in the Wikileaks' July 2010 disclosures –
which I call 'the Afghanistan Papers' – is to once again
reaffirm that there is a real nemesis called “Osama
Bin Laden”, that the “war on terror” is real, that
it is being inflicted upon the West from Pakistan-Iran nexus, and to
re-substantiate the handoff of former President George W. Bush's
clairvoyance to the Obama Administration
that “If another September 11 style attack is being planned,
it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”!
That, when such a “planned” attack transpires, it
“will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”. See:
‘Bin Laden’: Key enabler of “imperial
mobilization” and nuclear attack on Iran-Pakistan (
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2008/04/binladen-keyenabler-nuclearattack.html
).

The
successful handoff of “imperial mobilization” to
Pakistan and Iran, now further sprightly underscored by Wikileaks'
documents, is once again demonstrated by President Obama's Secretary
of State Hilary Clinton's July 2010 remark to the BBC
as quoted by Reuters:
“There are still additional steps that we are asking and
expecting the Pakistanis to take. But there is no doubt in anyone's
mind that should an attack against the United States be traced to be
Pakistani, it would (have) a very devastating impact on our
relationship”. And that is merely just another echo from
the Obama Administration of what the Pakistanis themselves have been
made to parrot the past 9 years, as demonstrated by its own
Ambassador's remark in 2008:

'[On]
Wednesday, a media report quoted Pakistan’s envoy to Washington
as saying that US leaders had warned Islamabad that if the United
States suffered an attack that was traced back to Pakistan Washington
would retaliate. “Those (statements) have been made,”
Ambassador Hussain Haqqani told editors and reporters at The
Washington Post. “We want to make sure that it doesn’t
come to that.”' -- DAWN, June 12, 2008

To
show Pakistan's unflinching willingness to do as much more as was
asked, the Ambassador of Pakistan had further stated in an interview
to Reuters in 2008:

'Pakistan
would attack Osama bin Laden the moment it had reliable intelligence
on the Al Qaeda leader's whereabouts, Ambassador Husain Haqqani said
on Wednesday. Haqqani also said he was confident Pakistan could help
foil any Al Qaeda plans to attack the United States, although he did
not know of any right now. “A cooperative effort between all
the allies, and that includes Afghanistan, Pakistan and the United
States and NATO – I think we can thwart any potential plans for
an attack,” Haqqani said in an interview with Reuters.

He
said Pakistani intelligence had helped defeat many of the “several
dozen” Al Qaeda plots detected worldwide since the September
11, 2001, attacks, but government officials knew of no immediate
threats to the United States. Haqqani said Pakistan would act on its
own against Al Qaeda if necessary. “If Pakistan, Afghanistan
or the United States had specific intelligence on the location of
Osama bin Laden, they would have acted on it. No reservations would
have come in the way of action on that, and none will even in the
future,” he said. “If any of us had that
actionable intelligence we would all act. We would act separately, we
would act in tandem, we would act cooperatively – we would
act.”' -- DAWN, June 12, 2008

So,
could these self-serving 'Afghanistan Papers' have been any more
convenient as a casus belli, carrying forth the same core-lies now
entering its tenth year? If Wikileaks' dramatization grabbing all the
world's headlines isn't an officially sponsored “modified
limited hangout” for exactly that purpose of reinforcing
the core-lies, then the White House not even bothering to stop the
New York Times – whose own motto is 'All the news that's fit to
print' – from publishing it, even giving it “all
got gold stars” as the Salon
put it on July 26, 2010, is downright inexplicable:

“So,
uh ... why was all of this information classified and top secret? If
it's old news, and it just confirms what "everyone" already
knows, what was the rationale for keeping it classified and calling
WikiLeaks all sorts of mean names for publishing it?”

What
would it matter afterwards, after Iran and Pakistan have been bombed,
what were lies and what was truth? Did the bogus mea culpa by the
2005 Presidential Commission on intelligence failure, the Iraq
Study Group's
disingenuous conclusion:
“We conclude that the intelligence community was dead
wrong in almost all of its prewar judgments about Iraq's weapons of
mass destruction. This was a major intelligence failure,”
reverse the decimation of Iraq? Did the New York Times 2008
revelation of Pentagon's
Message Machine
after 'all the barbers in town already knew it', return back to its
silos each and every cruise missile that was dropped upon the
innocent civilians of Iraq? Did Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski's bizarre
testimony of February
1, 2007
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee undo the grotesque
and criminal reality of “imperial mobilization” to
which he now openly admitted? Even his bold public admission
concerning the plausible false pretexts which could be found by the
United States to attack Iran never made it past CSPAN, and in fact
disappeared into the vast void of the Mighty Wurlitzer. What
was Brzezinski's motivation for ratting on his own henchmen is
anyone's guess. As a grandmaster strategist of The Grand Chessboard,
he publicly issued a dare to the hawks in the Bush Administration to
subvert or delay an imminent attack on Iran at this time.

Here
is what Brzezinski publicly admitted in his SFRC testimony on
February
1, 2007:

'If
the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody
involvement in Iraq, the final destination on this downhill track is
likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world
of Islam at large. A plausible scenario for a military collision with
Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by
accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some
provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran;
culminating in a “defensive” U.S. military action against
Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening
quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan.

A
mythical historical narrative to justify the case for such a
protracted and potentially expanding war is already being
articulated. Initially justified by false claims about WMD’s in
Iraq, the war is now being redefined as the “decisive
ideological struggle” of our time, reminiscent of the earlier
collisions with Nazism and Stalinism. In that context, Islamist
extremism and al Qaeda are presented as the equivalents of the threat
posed by Nazi Germany and then Soviet Russia, and 9/11 as the
equivalent of the Pearl Harbor attack which precipitated America’s
involvement in World War II.

This
simplistic and demagogic narrative overlooks the fact that Nazism was
based on the military power of the industrially most advanced
European state; and that Stalinism was able to mobilize not only the
resources of the victorious and militarily powerful Soviet Union but
also had worldwide appeal through its Marxist doctrine. In contrast,
most Muslims are not embracing Islamic fundamentalism; al Qaeda is an
isolated fundamentalist Islamist aberration; most Iraqis are engaged
in strife because the American occupation of Iraq destroyed the Iraqi
state; while Iran—though gaining in regional influence—is
itself politically divided, economically and militarily weak. To
argue that America is already at war in the region with a wider
Islamic threat, of which Iran is the epicenter, is to promote a
self-fulfilling prophecy.'

That
admission requires no further elaboration from this scribe except to
point out the smug hubris, that none among the senate committee
members will rise to challenge his own role in that “self-fulfilling
prophecy”, and none among the public's watchdogs of
democracy will deconstruct it in the newsmedia, and in the academia,
despite it being broadcast live on CSPAN. And they didn't!

Brzezinski's
bold chutzpah of blaming the Bush Administration for their
self-serving myth-making demagogic narratives to enable wars of
aggression as “self-fulfilling prophecy”, when the
sole superpower in every government is only following his own recipe
to fabricate “doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment,
and patriotic gratification” in order to pursue his
previously outlined “imperial mobilization”
agendas for “American Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Imperatives” on The Grand Chessboard, and the
“self-fulfilling prophecy” only overcomes his own
principal lament “that America is too democratic at home to
be autocratic abroad” which “limits the use of America's
power, especially its capacity for military intimidation”,
is outright disingenuous. It's like Hitler blaming his generals for
following Mein Kampf and conquering Europe, and Goebbels for being
the Reichminister for propaganda!

Such
ex post facto disingenuousness is evidently part and parcel of full
spectrum “imperial mobilization”. Without all
techniques of deception underlying modern statecraft, which is itself
never homogeneous and is plagued by competing narrow political
self-interests no differently than Mafioso
families in bloody turf competition while also agreeing to rob and
plunder the public at will, just as we see in Brzezinski's SFRC
testimony against his own lieutenants, nothing unpopular can be
mobilized in a “democracy”.

The
common man today is as averse to projects of imperial mobilizations
of the elite as in the yestercentury. He must be deceived into paying
for these projects, both with his toil, and with his life.
Machiavelli's thin book, The Prince, which is read by most
high-schoolers in Westerndom, is surely the most misread book of all
times. It is evidently read as a fairytale rather than as a most
pertinent political science key to the cryptogram of current affairs
--- for, the vast majority of these learned masses many of whom
eventually graduate from Western universities with high-falutin
credentials, demonstrate at best only a passing acquaintance with
that strangely popular sixteenth century Italian name. The handful
who may comprehend it, mostly go to work for statecraft and
thinktanks. The remaining do nothing with any of its insights into
how the elite must rule by way of deception and secrecy when they do
not have autocratic and dictatorial open authority over the masses
like that of kings and feudal lords in centuries past. In the modern
fiction of “democracy”, the elite can only govern by way
of engineering the public's consent, by keeping secrets, and by
adopting covert means, especially for carrying out long-term
unpopular agendas. The common man's attention span is just too short
to think about these agendas, and to sensibly relate them to current
affairs on a canvas any larger than his own immediate time and space
which is almost always bounded by his very narrow immediate
self-interests.

There
is, however, a very tiny minority of intelligent ones among the
public not so easily fooled. Some do learn from the lessons of
history and are able to relate it to the present. There is surely
something to be gained by examining what transpired during the
recently defunct Cold War in its “demand creation”
techniques (in marketing terms), and its four decades long
continuance via global fear mongering, and relating that to the
present. Otherwise, what's the grand purpose of studying history,
especially forensically studying it by shrewdly treating it as the
narrative of a crime scene written by the Mafioso families' own
scribes. The modern history scribes, often paid for by the
establishment, rehearse facts and figures ex post facto from official
documents without addressing the secret, and the not so secret,
motivations and behind the scenes forces that give birth to these
facts and realities constructed by the “history's actors”
(see history's
actors
quote below). It's almost like the sly French police Captain Louis
Renault in the film Casablanca, saying to the gendarmes:
“round up the usual suspects”
to cleverly deflect attention from the protagonist who has just shot
and killed the Gestapo chief – because, it is not in anyone's
interest to spotlight the real behind the scenes forces. Especially
when they or their legatees are still in control. And also because it
is not judged to be “sound academics”. The fear of being
seen as “conspiratorial” encourages intellectual
self-policing long before the establishment's academe and media
policing can kick-in and impact well-paying careers and fame. The
only useful purpose of studying history accurately, without
self-deception, without contrivance, and without apologetics, was
most elegantly captured by the wise playwright of the early twentieth
century, George Bernard Shaw:

“We are
made wise not by the recollections of our past, but by the
responsibility for our future.”

Gladio
Surrogate Terror

Witness
the following from the period of the Cold War, where synthetic terror
was used in Western Europe in order to convince the increasingly
skeptical public that the Communist threat was real requiring the
continuous heightened state of alert and rising military expenditures
at the expense of domestic spending – all revealed ex post
facto by the BBC documentary in 1992 on NATO's Operation
Gladio.
Part-3
of the Gladio documentary has the following lovely statement
quoted from the US Army's Top Secret Field Manual:

“Top
Secret: There may be times when host country governments show
passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US
Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations
which will convince host country governments and public opinion of
the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence
should seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special
assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the
most radical elements of the insurgency.”

Replacing
“Communist subversion” in the text above with
“Islamofascist terror” makes what is being stated in this
report obvious. See Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency
( http://tinyurl.com/Insurgency-Counterinsurgency
) in order to relate that US Army Field Manual recipe of yesteryear
with the present. In the year 2042, or even as early as
2032, surely by 2052, an updated BBC documentary will confirm it all,
with at best, a mere tsk, tsk, and the all knowing characteristic nod
at the imperial craftsmanship of empire. A
new generation of Noam Chomsky legatees
will emerge with new best-selling books
waiving their sublime morality at empire (see Hegelian Dialectic of
Dissent below) and will get to occupy prestigious chairs in the
academe as the new conscience of the world in one-world government.

What
appears to be out of control Terrorism worldwide in 2014, and which
is continuing to extract its pound of flesh from the
sovereignty of nation-states faster than any other global crisis to
date, can easily be comprehended when NATO's Operation Gladio of
yesteryear is employed as the political science template. The
motivations and the forces that drive global terrorism is writ large
in that most empirical exposure of state sponsored terror disguised
as “insurgency”. To make it believable and plausible,
real insurgents are created, and existing insurgent groups,
especially those with existential discontents, are infiltrated, and
their destructive energies channeled in service of larger political
agendas of which often the patsies themselves remain unaware of. The
evidence from CIA's
MK ULTRA program of yesteryear, and the empirical
suicide bombings in the terrorism acts
today, indicate to those who can observe rationally with even an iota
of brain functioning, that the art of manufacturing the perfect
Manchurian Candidate has been perfected. And so has its
deployment on demand as in Operation Gladio.

No
intelligence apparatus in any country, no news media, no
establishmentarian politician to scholar to military man, nor any of
the touted intellectuals playing dissent with the establishment's
narratives, go there. Why not? Because there are always substantial
tangible and intangible, as well as existential rewards to be gained
by silence. It is always beneficial to continue to play the fool, the
patsy, and the willing mercenary. See: Operation
Gladio Yesterday and Worldwide Terrorism Today – Identifying
the Enemy,
and Imperial
Surrogates and 'Terror Central' in Operation Gladio Redux.
See The
Dying Songbird
to comprehend the co-option of the intellectuals and how they
diabolically mislead and misdirect the public conscience from Left
to Right.
They shall all be ceremoniously anointed “arguably the most
important truth-tellers and intellectuals” tomorrow for their
brilliant ex post facto exposés of
the state deceptions of today, just as they are heralded today for
their dry study of yestercentury and its
war crimes.

That
is the real import of the craftsmanship of the Mighty Wurlitzer!
To engineer a fait accompli by manufacturing consent among the
gullible masses and controlling dissent among the rabble rousers when
“imperial mobilization” is still on-going, leaving
future scholars, historians, and the odd malcontent to laudingly
study the ashes, mea culpae, confessions, documentaries,
de-classified documents, and strategic rattings
left behind by “history's actors”. A diabolical
modus operandi of democratic statecraft which the Mighty Wurlitzer's
operators even brazenly gloat about:

'“We're
an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while
you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act
again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and
that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and
you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”'
(Ron Suskind, New York Times, Oct.
17, 2004)

It
is now patently obvious with the Obama Administration officially
declaring Osama Bin Laden killed in an American raid on May 1, 2011,
why Wikileaks had to “leak” the officialdom's belief that
he was still alive in July 2010! It is all too evident that some
mileage is being derived by officially burying that nemesis at sea, a
thousand miles from where they proclaim they killed him in an ambush
in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Conveniently, it was in Pakistan and not
Afghanistan that mankind's toughest and most resourceful nemesis was
found and killed. The color coded threat alerts instantly went up
worldwide. Pakistan Navy presumably already suffered a bizarre
revenge attack on its naval base in Karachi from Ali Baba's elusive
organization still intact, and now even more formidable than ever
before. And its base of operation? Of course Pakistan!

“If
another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is
being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”!

Brzezinski's
unraveling of that Bushism in his SFRC testimony quoted above
notwithstanding, was the 43rd President of the United States, George
W. Bush Jr., just inordinately insightful to predict such matters as
he was preparing to hand the presidential charge to his successor on
the “change” platform? Carefully dissecting the nature of
such self-serving propagandistic clairvoyance can perhaps also help
the public to become shrewdly clairvoyant in their own self-defense
in these often confusing matters on international relations.
Especially on what's likely to come as the next global mythical
terror threat in the aftermath of Osama Bin Laden. Let's briefly
review how the terrorism of 9/11 was continually foretold by the
masters of discourse themselves – for that will surely show the
public how to treat their next bit of self-serving fortune telling.

Taking
a Deeper Look into the Dynamics of Mantra Creation: Islamofascism

Let's
begin at the very inception of the 'arc of crisis' which Zbigniew
Brzezinski laid the groundwork for during his reign of terror upon
the USSR as the National Security Advisor to the 38th President of
the United States, Jimmy Carter. See Instrumenting
Kosovo in the 'arc of crisis' and the 'global zone of percolating
violence'
( http://tinyurl.com/arc-of-crisis
) for other details of the epoch and its connections to the present
'War on Terror'. It suffices to quote here the following brilliantly
clairvoyant statement attributed to Israeli Intelligence founder from
the same epoch in 1979, a full two decades prior to 9/11:

'On
Sept. 23, 1979, the founder of Israeli intelligence over dinner told
me that America was developing a tolerance for terror. The
gentleman's name was Isser Harel, the founder of Mossad Israeli
intelligence-he ran it from 1947 to 1963. He told me that America had
developed an alliance between two countries, Israel and Saudi Arabia,
and that the alliance with Saudi Arabia was dangerous and would
develop a tolerance for terror among Americans. He said if the
tolerance continued that Islamic fundamentalists would ultimately
strike America. I said "Where?" He said, "In
Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest
phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the
phallic symbol they will hit." Isser Harel prophesied
that the tallest building in New York would be the first building hit
by Islamic fundamentalists 21 years ago.' Source

And
Mossad again betrayed its brilliant clairvoyance 20 years later:

'The
attacks on the World Trade Centre's twin towers and the Pentagon were
humiliating blows to the intelligence services, which failed to
foresee them, and to the defence forces of the most powerful nation
in the world, which failed to deflect them. The Telegraph has learnt
that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli military
intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the
CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many of 200 terrorists
said to be preparing a big operation. "They had no
specific information about what was being planned but linked the plot
to Osama bin Laden and told the Americans that there were strong
grounds for suspecting Iraqi involvement," said a senior
Israeli security official.' --- UK
Telegraph, 16 Sep 2001

Seeded
by that “prophesy” from the stellar Israeli intelligence
mind, British Zionist Svengali at Princeton University, Professor
Bernard Lewis planted the 'The Roots of Muslim Rage' in 1990
in the Council on Foreign Relations' prestigious magazine Foreign
Affairs. An influential establishmentarian mouthpiece which is
read around the world by those who believe that if you want to know
what will happen ten years from now in any remote corner of the
world, read Foreign Affairs of ten years ago:

“In
1990 Bernard Lewis, a leading Western scholar of Islam, analyzed 'The
Roots of Muslim Rage,' and concluded: 'It should now be clear
that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level
of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This
is no less than a clash of civilizations – that perhaps
irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against
our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide
expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side
should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally
irrational reaction against our rival.'” --- Samuel
Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World
Order, 1996, pg. 213

That
'Muslim Rage' was subsequently transformed in 1996 into a full blown
political ideology for governing International Relations of the sole
superpower as the infamous 'Clash of Civilizations', by Bernard
Lewis' confrere and fellow Zionist at Harvard University, Professor
Samuel Huntington:

'The
underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is
Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the
superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of
their power. The problem for Islam is not the CIA or the US
Department of Defense. It is the West, a different civilization whose
people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe
that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the
obligation to extend that culture throughout the world. These are the
basic ingredient that fuel conflict between Islam and the West.' ---
Ibid. pg. 217

'Some
Westerners, including [ex] President Bill Clinton, have argued that
the West does not have problems with Islam but only with violent
Islamist extremists. Fourteen hundred years of history demonstrate
otherwise.... Islam is the only civilization which has put the
survival of the West in doubt, and it has done that at least twice...
The parallel concepts of 'jihad' and 'crusade' not only resemble each
other...' --- Ibid. pg. 209

This
systematic myth construction of 'Islamic Terror' was prime for
harvesting as the global 'War on Terrorism' on September 11, 2001 by
George W. Bush with the dialectical ultimatum to the world: “either
you are with us, or with the terrorists”!

Within
15 minutes of the super terrorism of that day in infamy, the
newsmedia had been awash in naming the first terrorist: Osama Bin
Laden! The scripted discourse is of course repeated ad nauseam to
this very day, the last time by President Obama himself while
announcing the boogeyman's demise on May 1, 2011: “Good
evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people, and to the
world. The United States has conducted an operation that has killed
Osama Bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda.”

That's
of course, after already having reiterated on the heals of his
predecessor, on June 4th 2009, who was responsible for 9/11: “But
let us be clear. Al Qaeeda killed nearly 3000 people on that day. The
victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many
other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.”

And
all foretold by the clairvoyance of the Zionist Israeli Mossad
founder, and reinforced by other Israeli Military Intelligence Mossad
agents in the days just preceding 9/11, of the brilliant Islamic
fundamentalists' successful attack on the West's most prominent
“phallic symbol”.

Bernard
Lewis subsequently justified George W. Bush's launching of the global
'War on Terrorism' in his phantasmic 2003 book Crisis of Islam –
Holy War and Unholy Terror. First by reinforcing his earlier
seeding of the mantra of 'the roots of the irrational Muslim rage',
and extending those roots to Islam itself:

'But
Islam, like other religions, has also known periods when it inspired
in some of its followers a mood of hatred and violence. It is our
misfortune that we have to confront part of the Muslim world while it
is going through such a period, and when most – though by no
means all – of that hatred is directed against us.' ---
Bernard Lewis, Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror,
pg. 25

And
then clairvoyantly predicting the following self-serving conclusions
as his last word:

'If
the fundamentalists are correct in their calculations and succeed in
their war, then a dark future awaits the world, especially that part
of it that embraces Islam.' --- Ibid. Chapter IX: The Rise of
Terrorism, pg. 164

'If
freedom fails and terror triumphs, the peoples of Islam will be the
first and greatest victims. They will not be alone, and many others
will suffer with them.' --- Ibid. Afterword, December 1, 2003,
pg. 169

The
Collateral Damage to Language for Synthesizing the Doctrinal
Motivation of Islamofascism

Before
we continue further, it is necessary to deconstruct the crafty use of
language for synthesizing the aforementioned propaganda to fuel the
“War on Terror”. The following is extracted from Project
Humanbeingsfirst's very critical response to the CAIR (Council on
American Islamic Relations) Report titled Calling
CAIR to Account for its Omissions,
for their egregiously omitting the most crucial fact of the matter in
their otherwise stellar documentation of the rise of Islamophobia in
America. The CAIR report (which incidentally underscores the
observation that the name Council
on American Islamic Relations sounds awfully
similar to the Council on Public Relations founded by Edward Bernays
to recast systems of propaganda into a new respectable light as
“public relations” after World War II, the pathetic
report is evidently serving the same function) was issued in
collaboration with the Center for Race & Gender at the University
of California, Berkeley. The significance of the following
dismantling from first principles, beginning with the very use of
language and the re-semantification of words to construct the
propaganda system of Islamofascism, will not be lost to the builders
of tall totem poles who worry about having plausibly sound doctrinal
foundations in order to have propaganda stand at all.

Let's
examine the usage of the word “Islam” by Bernard Lewis.

Unlike
Christians and Christianity, Muslims have two completely separate
words to designate the people who proclaim to follow the religion or
are born into that culture (Muslims) vs. the divine religion (Islam).
Any time you see one terminology aliasing for another, you might do
well to remember that there is some axe to grind somewhere. Bernard
Lewis is the venerable master of this obfuscation being amiably
carried by CAIR without reservation. Bernard Lewis began his treatise
“Crisis of Islam – Holy War and Unholy Terror” with
the following gem:

“It
is difficult to generalize about Islam. To begin with, the word
itself is commonly used with two related but distinct meanings, as
the equivalents both of Christianity, and Christendom. In the one
sense, it denotes a religion, as system of beliefs and worship; in
the other, the civilization that grew up and flourished under the
aegis of that religion. The word Islam thus denotes more than
fourteen centuries of history, a billion and a third people, and a
religious and cultural tradition of enormous diversity.”
--- Bernard Lewis, Crisis of Islam, pg. 1

That
last sentence is the diabolical deception with which imperial
craftsmanship subverts our religion: “The word Islam thus
denotes more than fourteen centuries of history, a billion and a
third people, and a religious and cultural tradition of enormous
diversity.”

According
to the Author of the Holy Qur'an upon which the religion of Islam is
based, the word “Islam” denotes only, and only, the
following:

“This
day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor
on you and chosen for you Islam as a religion;” Holy
Qur'an, Surah Al-Maeda verse fragment 5:3

Indeed.
Islam is the name of a religion, “deen” (الْإِسْلَامَ
دِينًا ).

That
is the only, repeat only, context in which the word “Islam”
can be legitimately used. It is the only context in which Qur'an has
used it, indicating a divine religion to which the Author of the
Qur'an itself gave the name “Islam”. The people didn't
chose that name. Whether or not someone believes in Qur'an's
“divinity” is irrelevant to us here; that is what the
Book and the Religion upon which Bernard Lewis is proffering his
imperial scholarship, itself proclaims.

This
is very significant. The word “Islam” is quite
distinct from the word used to designate Islam's followers and the
affairs of its followers. That separation of terminology is itself
espoused in the Holy Qur'an by virtue of having a separate
terminology to refer to the followers. Once again, while this may
sound repetitious, but to the Western mind wholly attuned to
referring to Christians and Christianity with the same root word
devolving from their God named “Christ”, no amount of
repetition can ever be sufficient to drive the point home. The Qur'an
itself defined a different nomenclature to name its followers; the
followers didn't:

“Our
Lord! make of us Muslims, bowing
to Thy (Will), and of our progeny a Muslim nation,
bowing to Thy (will);
and show us our place for the celebration of (due) rites; and
turn unto us (in Mercy); for Thou art the Oft-Returning, Most
Merciful.” Holy Qur'an Surah Al-Baqara 2:128

This
separation of terminology between the name of the religion and the
name of its followers is in fact a singular distinction of Islam in
comparison to all the other Abrahamic religions. Indeed, in
comparison to all major religions of the world including Hinduism,
Buddhism, Confucianism,
and Zoroastrianism, none of which feature such a clear linguistic
separation of nouns in their own respective scriptures. For instance,
while the followers of (prophet?) Zoroastra
are called Parsis, that word came about culturally rather than
scripturally by way of the geographic region, Persia, where his
followers originated and flourished.

This
is why followers of Prophet Muhammad for instance, are not called
“Mohammedans”, nor believers of Islam “Islamic”,
“Islamist”, Arabist, etc. except by the prejudicial
orientalists.

The
word designated in the Holy Qur'an for human beings who are Muslims,
regardless of good or bad people, pious or murderers, sinners or
saints, is “Muslims”, or to be exact in the
transliteration of verse 2:128 quoted above, “Muslimeen”
(مُسْلِمَيْنِ
).

The
Muslims throughout the world, practicing and non practicing, by mere
self-identification alone, without requiring
any certification of faith from a pontiff,
are referred in the Holy Qur'an as “Muslim Umma”, or to
be exact in the transliteration of verse 2:128 quoted above,
“Ummat-e-Muslima” (أُمَّةً
مُسْلِمَةً
);
a single Muslim nation bound solely by an ideology named “Islam”,
rather than by geography, race, ancestry, ethnicity, socio-economic
class, profession, or gender.

All
who misuse the Qur'anic terminology, Muslims and non-Muslims alike,
are either ignorant peoples – and there are always plenty of
“learned morons” and parrots in every epoch who are
deftly planted on the pulpit – or, the respected apprentices of
Machiavelli. In the latter case, they deliberately try to subvert the
religion of Islam by associating it with the inglorious non Islamic
deeds in the rich imperial history of Muslims. Associating empire,
imperial history, culture, civilization, etc., with the religion of
Islam as defined in its singular scripture the Holy Qur'an, is a bold
non sequitur. See the multi-part case study “Islam:
Why is the Holy Qur'an so easy to hijack?”
where this Bernard Lewis fabrication: “To
begin with, the word itself is commonly used with two related but
distinct meanings, as the equivalents both of Christianity, and
Christendom. ... The word Islam thus denotes more than fourteen
centuries of history, a billion and a third people, and a religious
and cultural tradition of enormous diversity.” is
shown to be a clever big lie of a sophisticated, but
ultimately still only a “vulgar
propagandist”, in much
greater depth even though this brief deconstruction already suffices.
(See The Hegelian Dialectic of Dissent below for the source of this
accurate epithet.)

One
can immediately see the result of such gratuitous binding. It enables
drawing false and specious associations by overloading the semantics
in an already well-defined nomenclature.

That
is the principal basis for subliminally, as well as cognitively,
binding something virtuous (the religion) with something abhorrent
(the vile deeds of the peoples, their kings, their cultures, their
civilization). Thus, when the word Islam is mentioned, the abhorrent,
or whatever is deemed abhorrent by Oriental scholarship, naturally
springs to the mind of the seduced.

Based
solely on that premeditated collateral damage to language that Samuel
Huntington, the late circus clown of empire at Harvard, diabolically
made the already quoted statement on “Islam” in his
treatise “The Clash of Civilizations”. It is reproduced
again because now we dissect it from the language point of view:

“The
underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is
Islam, a different civilization whose people are convinced of the
superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of
their power. The problem for Islam is not the CIA or the US
Department of Defense. It is the West, a different civilization whose
people are convinced of the universality of their culture and believe
that their superior, if declining, power imposes on them the
obligation to extend that culture throughout the world. These are
the basic ingredient that fuel conflict between Islam and the West.”
(Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of
World Order, 1996, pg. 217)

Since
when did the word "Islam" indicate civilization? A
civilization is an aggregate of peoples, harboring one or more
cultures, one or more languages, one or more customs, one or more
religions. Like the Western civilization which has the nations of
German, French, English, American, Russian, etceteras, that many
languages, and many religions are practiced in these nations,
including atheism, Christianity, and Islam. Whereas Islam is a
religion, a “deen”. A religion can be practiced in any
civilization, by any peoples, including right here in the USA.

Samuel
Huntington's teacher was evidently Bernard Lewis, as evidenced from
their common re-semantification of the word “Islam”. This
is how Huntington was able to demonize Islam: “The
underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is
Islam,” and “These are the basic ingredient
that fuel conflict between Islam and the West.” We have
already witnessed the passage above in which Samuel Huntington cited
his Princeton University confrere Bernard Lewis as the author of 'The
Roots of Muslim Rage' and the first authority on the “Clash
of Civilizations”.
They incestuously reinforce each other rather well, don't they? Cass
Sunstein, the other propagandist Harvard Law professor and President
Obama's information tzar, referred to such incestuous
self-reinforcements in his erudite paper on “Conspiracy
Theories”
in the more refined academic jargon, as “crippled
epistemology”.

Caption
The Hegelian Dialectic side A: Reviling Islam (Islam is of
The Devil by Pastor Terry Jones)

As
we perceptively observe, it is the diabolical misuse of language
which first and foremost enables drafting a thesis like “Clash
of Civilizations”. (See Prisoners of the Cave Chapter 9
which deconstructs Huntington's craftsmanship in more depth.) Such
theses, made erudite and plausible sounding with the IVY League
stamp, are thence crafted into simple propaganda to seed the Mighty
Wurlitzer's many compositions. It is repeated ad nauseam thereafter.

Since
Western people's point of reference is mainly Christianity
where the common root word denotes everything, the people
“Christians”, the religion “Christianity”,
the civilization “Christendom”, even the God “Christ”
– in fact everything that Bernard Lewis falsely and maliciously
imputed to Islam on page 1 of his propaganda manual “Crisis of
Islam” – the same kitchen sink linguistics
devilishly attributed to Islam, repeatedly, makes it believable for
the un-informed Western public.

Thus,
maligning Islam before the un-informed masses becomes a child's play
for the Mighty Wurlitzer. Effective propaganda is always targeted
only at the ordinary un-informed peoples, “the crowd of
simpletons and the credulous”, as examined in the
report Manufacturing
Dissent.
Its core purpose is to control public behavior by instilling false
beliefs.

And
we can see its rich harvest not in just the 'United We Stand' against
“militant Islam” and the unfettered “imperial
mobilization” and “shock and “awe”, but in
the Qur'an burning, Islam bashing, and other Islamophobic festivities
of the ignorant people against Muslims. It is surely not a surprise
then, that Islamophobia should have increased steadily in the United
States and the West since 9/11. Islamophobia is only the desired and
natural effect of the propaganda system of the Mighty Wurlitzer. Like
the festering boil on the protesting bride's lip, it is only
symptomatic of the real syphilis beneath
the virtuous wedding gown.

This
crucial analysis unarguably illustrates how imperial scholars
incestuously reinforce each other in implanting the “doctrinal
motivation” mentioned by Zbigniew Brzezinski as being
necessary for “imperial mobilization”. It was
pretty much the same protocol in the quest for Lebensraum of
the Third Reich in yesteryear. At Nuremberg, the Nazi Party's chief
philosopher, Alfred Rosenberg, was hanged for his mumbo jumbo. The
third Reich's chief of propaganda, Reichminister of Propaganda and
National Enlightenment, Dr. Joseph Goebbels, committed suicide after
administering cyanide to his wife and six young children before the
long arm of justice could wring his neck. Just thought I'd mention
that in passing.

Such
premeditated collateral damage to language, with the concomitant
priming of doctrinal fuel for the long gestating mantras of “The
Roots of Muslim Rage” years in advance of its catastrophic
unveiling, is what so trivially enabled forging a bipartisan
political consensus on the US foreign policy of aggression and
invasion in the immediate aftermath of the shock effects of 9/11. The
Patriot Act I was passed quickly without reading, and the entire
United States Congress, save one member, gave its green light to
invade Afghanistan. The mightiest and richest nation on earth
patriotically savaged the poorest and weakest nation on earth in a
broad political consensus. The American peoples 'United We Stand'
saluting the flag, and motor car bumper
stickers proudly proclaimed “We Support Our Troops”.

Please
refer back to Zbigniew Brzezinski's quoted passages above to refresh
your memory that he had shrewdly stated in 1996: “Moreover,
as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find
it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues,
except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived
direct external threat.”The Grand Chessboard
effectively blueprints the entire chain of causal linkages which have
empirically transpired since 9/11, exactly as it was for Hitler's
Mein Kampf.

Furthermore,
also recall the previously quoted clairvoyant statements made by the
so called Terrorism Study Group. These too
lend prima facie evidence for how the Mighty Wurlitzer premeditatedly
harnessed the 'searing' or 'molding' event of 9/11, the
“new Pearl Harbor”, to successfully capitalize
on the pre-implanted public myths of Islamofascism to launch the
perpetual “War on Terror”. For, in all that
confusion surrounding the event of Catastrophic Terrorism, fait
accompli of the despotic response by the sole superpower was
automatically seeded because “Like Pearl Harbor, such an
event [divides] our past and future into a ‘before’ and
‘after.’” Now anything goes because“what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in
revolutionary times”,
including launching aggressive wars against innocent nations, and
turning one's own nation into a police-state. Ex post facto, print
all about it in the New York Times!

Thus,
also recall the previously mentioned chutzpah of their mea culpae, ex
post facto, led by the Iraq Study Group in 2005 blaming “intelligence
failure” for the missing WMDs in Iraq, and the New York
Times in 2008 blaming the Pentagon, see Pentagon's
Message Machine
Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand,
April 20, 2008. More such revelations will continue to occur as world
government is incrementally cemented. Someday, even sixth graders
will learn about it with a tad more honesty than the public is
permitted to know today, just as school children candidly learn today
about the genocide of the native American Indians on their own land.

What
had appeared to casual observers who had been interested enough to
read this stuff before the events of 9/11, to be only academic
psychoanalyses of the American public,
became the actual reality of “imperial mobilization”
exactly as was so boldly foretold in these public writings.

It
is also useful to recall at this point that the US Chief prosecuting
counsel at Nuremberg, Robert H. Jackson, had declared on hearing the
feigned protestations from the Nazi leadership on trial that they
didn't know anything about Hitler's plans for Lebensraum:

“The
plans of Adolf Hitler for aggression were just as secret as Mein
Kampf, of which over six million copies were published in Germany”
--- Justice Robert H. Jackson in his closing speech at
Nuremberg, on Friday, 7/26/1946, Morning Session, Part 3, Trial of
the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal

Thus,
Islamophobia steadily rising even in the tenth year of the
catastrophic terrorism of 9/11 as documented by CAIR
and the University
of California, Berkeley,
is a direct descendent of the Dynamics of Mantra Creation for
“Islamofascism”. One can no more describe the effects of
Islamophobia without also describing its first cause, the American
Mein Kampfs written by Jewish hands in Muslim blood to launch
“imperial mobilization”, than one can describe the
color of a tree without describing its first cause, the DNA of the
tree.

Don't
these scholars know their own literature? Can't they judge
motivation? Can they not add two plus two to equal four? Will they
also brazenly feign on their own day of reckoning that they were just
highly paid ignorant morons unaware of the new Mein Kampfs
rather than the learned scholars they are now presented to be?

Only
vulgar propagandists and traffickers in truth will hide the causal
linkages between pre-planned doctrines and
the unfolding reality. That is a crime against the people! And only
fools and useful idiots among them will pretend to not understand
that crime. And that is the overarching success of the Mighty
Wurlitzer. The myth of militant Islam has been successfully
cast into perceived reality for the public.

The
Hegelian Dialectic Militant Islam vs. Moderate Islam

The
preceding success of the Mighty Wurlitzer effectively enables
introducing the Hegelian Dialectic of “moderate Islam”.

Once
demonized sufficiently with “militant Islam” and
“islamofascism”, with “Islamophobia”
sufficiently priming the public, the new propaganda slogan
automatically becomes: we want to “reform Islam” for a
more “moderate Islam”!

To
mobilize this new devil like the previous one for “militant
Islam” also requires the same “high degree of
doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic
gratification.” as perceptively observed by Zbigniew
Brzezinski in The Grand Chessboard. Please refer back to the full
quoted excerpt above to remind yourself of this fact.

Thus
new comparable works of “doctrinal
motivation” become available preaching “moderate
Islam”. These works and writings started appearing immediately
in the aftermath of 9/11 with learned Muslim clerics making loud
proclamations against “militant Islam” and speaking of
“good Muslims” vs. “bad Muslims” (see
interview Shaykh Hamza Yusuf Hanson, San Jose Mercury News, Sunday
Edition, September 16, 2001, cached).
Clerics most faithfully echoing the core message of empire are
immediately invited to the White House and to the Presidential
Address in Congress by President George W. Bush Jr. and seated with
Laura Bush and Tony Blair for dutifully speaking out against
“Militant Islam” (watch CSPAN
Presidential Address, September 20, 2001, see video
image
of Shaykh Hamza Yusuf with Laura Bush, Tony Blair, Donald Rumsfeld
offering standing ovation to George W. Bush's pending invasions of
Muslim nations along with the rest of United States Congress).
Religious fatwas are issued against “militant Islam”
and terrorism by “moderate” clerics in favor of “moderate
Islam” (see Response
to the Fatwa on Terrorism in the Service of Empire,
this photograph
reveals the fatwa granting cleric Tahir ul Qadri prominently
seated and speaking at the World Economic Forum).

Caption
Shaykh Hamza Yusuf Hanson, a fiery Muslim cleric from San Jose,
California, convert from Christianity, founder of Zaytuna
College in Berkeley to teach “moderate Islam” to American
Muslims, attending George W. Bush's presidential address to US
Congress on September 20, 2001, seated immediately behind British
Prime Minister Tony Blair, American First Lady Laura Bush, and
American Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, giving standing
ovation to the American president's announcement
of perpetual war on “militant Islam” (Photograph source
CSPAN).
How does a convert Muslim cleric get such
rapid security clearance that within just 9 days of the most
catastrophic terrorism on America's soil, he is seated with the most
powerful rulers of the world – and applauding their waging of
barbaric wars upon Muslim nations? Only a long cultivated
intelligence asset of the Mighty Wurlitzer for cognitive infiltration
of the American and Western Muslim Mind! That manufactured
product, in 2012 was graciously anointed
42nd among “The World's 500 Most Influential
Muslims”, two places ahead of even Seyyed
Hossein Nasr, the
prolific Muslim scholar at George Town University, by some idiotic
think-tank setup among Muslims as their House Nigger
drum-beater for the Mighty Wurlitzer.

Caption
Pakistani house niggers,
Imran Khan and Tahir ul Qadri, seated on the massa's table at
the Western super financial elite's World Economic Forum annual
meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 27,
2011. (Photograph source: a reader submission) How did these two
political “no-ops” of least significance get invited to
world economic forum for the white man's recognition? They are
neither financiers, nor industrialists, and nor do they hold any
economic or financial ministerial position
within the government of Pakistan. Yes, as Western intelligence
assets managed by their local counterpart, both are being rewarded
for selling the massa's pitch on “moderate Islam” (even
in their occasional controlled dissent with
the Pakistani establishment which is most dutifully towing the
massa's full line on “militant Islam”). And Tahir ul
Qadri specifically for his “600
page Fatwa on Terrorism”.
Both house niggers artfully
retain the core axioms of massa on “militant Islam”
to continually push the envelope of the Hegelian Dialectic forward as
a self-fulfilling prophecy!

Caption
The Hegelian Dialectic side B: Reforming Islam“... Quran translated by an American woman. This modern,
inclusive translation refutes past translations that have been used
to justify violence against women.” (The Sublime
Quran By Laleh Bakhtiar http://tinyurl.com/Critique-Laleh-Bakhtiar-Zahir )

New
translations of the Holy Qur'an are marketed to “bring
reform to Islam” by respectable progressive
scholars (see Critique:
Laleh Bakhtiar and The Sublime
Quran
, http://tinyurl.com/Critique-Laleh-Bakhtiar-Zahir ). Shocking
eye-catching news headlines in Westerndom's most prestigious
newspapers announce their availability (see The Sunday Times of
London, March 31, 2007, Wife-beating
rejected in ‘new’ Koran
).

And
the same three ring circus is masterfully conducted by the Mighty
Wurlitzer with the “moderate Islam” show added to play
concurrently in the same broad arena with many other side shows
(switching metaphor for appropriateness). The crucial difference in
this instance however is that it is seemingly staged by “reform
minded”, progressive, as well as conservative Muslims
themselves. Sophisticated and scholarly looking Muslim intellectuals
are recruited for this purpose from across the intellectual spectrum
(see FAQ
What is an Intellectual Negro?).

Muslim
bookstores prominently feature the “reform Islam”
authors' works with glowing tributes: “This is the first
edition of the Quran translated by an American woman. This modern,
inclusive translation refutes past translations that have been used
to justify violence against women.” (see Kazi
Publications,
frontpage cached).
Please refer to Critique:
Laleh Bakhtiar and The Sublime
Quran
where the following commonsense is noted with respect to the
preceding statement:

'It
is your grave misconception that Muslims beat their wives because the
Holy Qur'an gives them permission to beat their wives. Muslims also
kill their wives, do honor killings of their children and family
members, and a thousand other grotesque and equally criminal things
in Muslim societies – and the Holy Qur'an strictly forbids
it all.

And
Muslims do no more horrendous acts than the pious Western Christians
and holy Western Jews who commit the most heinous crimes, and
monumental crimes against humanity which are on-going even as I write
this. The white man today is calculatingly killing and raping far
more Muslim women on a daily basis with “shock and awe”,
drone attacks, military occupation, to the thunderous silence of
Western champions of human rights than any Muslims assaulting their
wives in domestic quarrels because of 4:34. But of course it is
Islam which needs to be reformed first with a new translation of the
Holy Qur'an. Daniel Pipes must
be feeling rather pleased with himself for this fortuitous gift.' ---
Zahir Ebrahim in his letter of critique to Laleh Bakhtiar

It
is evidently more effective if respectable looking mainstream Muslims
themselves appear to drive the demand to “bring reform to
Islam” for “moderate Islam” rather than
Jews like Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz, Bernard Lewis, the late
Samuel Huntington, the neo-cons at AIPAC, JINSA. AEI; Christians like
the 700 Club, Quran burning pastor of the Church in Florida whose
book on Islam is pictured above; the White House, the Pentagon; the
think-tanks; the Western courts, et. al., appear to be driving
it. The synergistic WWF wrestling
matches however always only collect windfall profits for the same
root promoter.

The
revealing thing to observe here is the intriguing background of some
of the most prominent among these “moderate Islam” shrill
voices in America. They are often converts to Islam from Christian
heritage and have become self-taught scholars of Islam in America
with imposing command of Arabic. The loud mouth striving to “bring
reform to Islam” by writing an entirely new English
translation of the Holy Qur'an no less, titled The Sublime Quran (see
image above), grew up as a Catholic of mixed Iranian-American
parentage. She is Laleh Bakhtiar, Ph.D. in Education Psychology. As a
linguist in Arabic and English, she employs the same
re-semantification of the word “Islam” as Bernard Lewis
and Samuel Huntington when she pitches “bring reform to
Islam”! In the Critique:
Laleh Bakhtiar and The Sublime
Quran:

'You
surely could not have meant 'reform the religion of Islam' for which
the Holy Qur'an stated:

“This
day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor
on you and chosen for you Islam as a religion;” Holy
Qur'an, Surah Al-Maeda verse fragment 5:3

You
surely must have meant to say 'reform the misunderstandings among the
Muslims regarding Islam.'

Then
why not just say exactly what you mean?

Does
the statement “bring reform to Islam” mean the same thing
as 'bring reform to Muslims' to a grammarian and linguist who has
translated the Holy Qur'an from Arabic into English?' ---
Zahir Ebrahim in his letter of critique to Laleh Bakhtiar

And
the loudest mouth decrying “militant Islam” from the
first day of 9/11 is of course Hamza Yusuf, convert to Islam from
Orthodox Christianity. He was studying to be a male nurse in Santa
Clara California where I knew him in the
1980s giving fiery Friday sermons to the
delight of the pious Muslim worshipers, before he conferred upon
himself the lofty honorific of “Shaykh”
in the 1990s and started his own institute to teach “moderate
Islam” to Americans. Called the Zaytuna Institute, now Zaytuna
College in Berkeley. He is well respected among many American Muslims
who swear by his scholarship with an almost cult like faith –
the “moderate Islam”. He has acquired
international fame for his oratory and his command of the arcane in
the Muslim writings of antiquity so revered by the majority of
Muslims. He told the UK Guardian's Jack O'Sullivan in an article
titled: 'If
you hate the west, emigrate to a Muslim country',
October 08, 2001:

'
"Many Muslims seem to be in deep denial about what has
happened," he says. "They are coming up with different
conspiracy theories and don't entertain the real possibility that it
was indeed Muslims who did this. Yet we do have people within our
ranks who have reached that level of hatred and misguidance." '

Jack
O'Sullivan introduced Hamza Yusuf in the lede to his aforementioned
article with this description:

'Hamza
Yusuf is arguably the west's most influential Islamic scholar. Many
Muslims find his views hard to stomach, but he is advising the White
House on the current crisis, and today he will be talking to
religious leaders in the UK'.

As
respected Muslim opinion makers bearing exactly the right credentials
to appeal to their respective Muslim constituencies, they make great
useful idiots and/or assets for this Hegelian Dialectic just like
their “militant Islam”
counterparts, whether or not they are themselves
aware of it. It is no different than the suicide bombers recruited
for “militant Islam” and being handled by local
intelligence handlers who themselves deeply believe in their divine
mission quite oblivious to the reality that they are dancing to the
Mighty Wurlitzer's tune. Unless of course, also like many of their
counterparts in the theater of “militant
Islam”, they too were psychologically profiled and directly
recruited as controlled sleeper assets of the Mighty Wurlitzer a long
time ago for later harvesting.

Empiricism
has the bad habit of revealing the obvious.
It is especially pertinent to observe how this Hamza Yusuf character
immediately sprung into prominent action as if on cue in the
immediate aftermath of 9/11. When the rest of American news media was
blaming “militant Islam” within 15 minutes of 9/11,
Hamza Yusuf managed to get his interview published in the San Jose
Mercury News in the very first Sunday's edition after 9/11, September
16, 2001, condemning “militant Islam” with pious
indignation. And on September 20, 2001 was in the White House, and
seated next to Laura Bush in Congress. And thereafter meeting British
leaders selling the empire's story to Muslims in Britain.

No
Trojan Horse agent of the Mighty Wurlitzer could have done more than
Hamza Yusuf did – contribute directly to build consensus for
invading Afghanistan and the 'War on Terror' by driving it from the
angle of “moderate Islam”.

It
is no accident that each and every prominent proponent of “moderate
Islam” and “reform Islam” also promulgates that
9/11 was done by “militant Islam” echoing the core-axiom
of empire!

And
this is precisely what betrays them, the fact that they are running
with the foxes while hunting with the hounds. Otherwise the
Hegelian Dialectic would not work!

The
message to their own flock is simple but effective, drawn right from
Edward Bernays text book on Propaganda quoted at the very beginning
of this report, and Hitler's Mein Kampf. Just as Dr. Joseph Goebbels
had a very simple message for corralling the Germans, these Muslim
leaders have an equally simple message for their flock adapted from
empire's singular core-axiom. First, in order to refresh one's
memory, this is what is reported in Mein Kampf:

'The
success of any advertisement, whether of a business or political
nature, depends on the consistency and perseverance with which it is
employed.

In
this respect also the propaganda organized by our enemies set us an
excellent example.

It
confined itself to a few themes, which were meant exclusively for
mass consumption, and it repeated these themes with untiring
perseverance.

Once
these fundamental themes and the manner of placing them before the
world were recognized as effective, they adhered to them without the
slightest alteration for the whole duration of the War.

At
first all of it appeared to be idiotic in its impudent assertiveness.
Later on it was looked upon as disturbing, but finally it was
believed.

But
in England they came to understand something further: namely, that
the possibility of success in the use of this spiritual weapon
consists in the mass employment of it, and that when employed in this
way it brings full returns for the large expenses incurred.

In
England propaganda was regarded as a weapon of the first order,
whereas with us it represented the last hope of a livelihood for our
unemployed politicians and a snug job for shirkers of the modest hero
type. ...

I
learned something that was important at that time, namely, to snatch
from the hands of the enemy the weapons which he was using in his
reply. I soon noticed that our adversaries, especially in the persons
of those who led the discussion against us, were furnished with a
definite repertoire of arguments out of which they took points
against our claims which were being constantly repeated.

The
uniform character of this mode of procedure pointed to a systematic
and unified training.

And
so we were able to recognize the incredible way in which the enemy's
propagandists had been disciplined, and I am proud to-day that I
discovered a means not only of making this propaganda ineffective but
of beating the artificers of it at their own work. Two years later I
was master of that art.' [Mein Kampf, Adolph Hitler, Vol. 2, Chapter
VI]

Now
compare to what is repeated ad nauseam and
with great consistency from virtually every “good” Muslim
mosque pulpit and from every “good” Muslim institutional
soapbox including the most prominent American
Muslim civil rights organization CAIR noted earlier, each using their
own diction of course to inflict precisely the following Propaganda
for “moderate Islam”:

it
was “militant Islam” which is responsible for 9/11
attacks,

these
are the “bad” Muslims, we are the “good”
Muslims, we don't do terrorism,

Consequently,
religion-based as well as secular-based voices of “moderate
Islam”, the lofty bearers of this propaganda feast for the “the
crowd of simpletons and the credulous”, are immediately
effective in corralling the majority of
“good” Muslims. They span the full gamut of persuasions
from conservatives (Hamza Yusuf
et. al.) to reform oriented progressives and seculars (CAIR et. al.,
Laleh Bakhtiar et. al.). All “good” Muslims end up
“United We Stand” with the empire in its perpetual war
against “militant Islam” following their respective pied
pipers. This propaganda transcends the sectarian divide among the
“good” Muslims in the West. This is the dominant
characteristic of the vast majority of the 'United We Stand'
mainstream Muslims.

To
draw upon empiricism to validate, observe
the “good Muslims” inextricably caught in this Hegelian
Dialectic in Muslims
against Terrorism
(frontpage cached),
and watch the rich and famous make Proud
to be American Muslims
videos to distance themselves from “militant Islam”.
Joseph Goebbels would be immensely proud of his legatees. At
the peak of hubris, Sieg
Heil
is the only reality!

The
few angry Muslims escaping Sieg Heil like the rest of the few angry
citizens, but still caught in the Hegelian Dialectic are corralled by
the controlled dissent-space anxiously waiting to welcome them. See
Hegelian Dialectic of Dissent below.

The
controlled dissent is run very efficiently on a treadmill permitting
the angry Muslims along with the rest of the Western public to vent
their lungs out shouting in the streets, and their fingers out typing
on the internet, before they return back to their jobs Monday morning
feeling fresh from the weekend catharsis.
The too angry among them who are not so easily placated by “weekend
jihad” soon acquire the label “bad”
or “terrorist”. There is no escape for them so long as
they remain caught in the Hegelian Dialectic.

Please
go back a little to the Guardian interview with Hamza Yusuf quoted
above and observe the uncanny exactness in the wording which almost
mirrors the New York Times' anointing Noam Chomsky. Between “[Noam
Chomsky is] arguably the most important intellectual alive”
(New York Times) driving the Left, and “Hamza
Yusuf is arguably the west's most influential Islamic scholar”
(Guardian) driving the Muslim
Right, both proclaiming “militant Islam” attacked America
on 9/11 in great synergy with the White House and the Pentagon, the
field is covered.

One
heads the manufacturing dissent factory catching those who escape the
Hegelian Dialectic of “militant Islam” vs. “moderate
Islam”, the other heads the manufacturing consent factory for
“moderate Islam” against “militant Islam”
beating the imperial drums.

Where
you gonna go?

Those
few who eventually wizen up to it all and
fearlessly exit that Hegelian Dialectic altogether
are now attempted to be corralled in warmly
welcoming “conspiracy” groups strategically cultivated
for exactly this purpose as part of “imperial mobilization”
planning. As Cass Sunstein put it in “Conspiracy
Theories”,
these groups lend “beneficial cognitive diversity”
to aid statecraft defocus all the angry energies.

If
the Hegelian Dialectic didn't get all the morally angry people as it
did the vast majority of the public diabolically trapped between the
false paradigm of “militant Islam” vs. “moderate
Islam” and controlled dissent all sharing the empire's
core-axioms, this trap catches the remaining majority. Watch how the
most intelligent among this lot soon find themselves in the 9/11
Truth Movement. See Toronto
Hearings: A strange cast of characters among 9/11 Truth Leadership.

That
treadmill is strategically designed to occupy the remaining morally
angry people studying 9/11 mysteries and how the WTC towers came down
repeatedly calling for “new investigations”. The
“history's actors” of course, unbeknownst to these
bright lads, have already announced that this is precisely what they
shall all be kept busy with: “We're history's actors . .
. and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”In the meantime, the “history's actors” have
acted again and created “new realities”.

There
is no exit from that trap either so long as one is kept occupied with
the previous fait accompli leaving the “history's actors”
free to enact new ones!

The
aforementioned set of comprehensive fly traps
pretty much ensnare what appears to this scribe to be close to ninety
nine percent of the nation's citizenry. About the remaining odd
percent (or two), Adolph Hitler had observed in his Mein Kampf: “the
value of these [skeptics] lies in their intelligence and not in their
numerical strength,”! No one pays any attention to them
whatsoever. If they speak, they are first ignored, then reviled, and
then made an offer they can't refuse. As part of
“imperial mobilization” planning, statecraft
ensured via the Patriot Acts, police state laws, “no fly
lists”, etc., that there remained no effective means for
ordinary citizens to ever effectively mobilize themselves together on
a single focussed goal of derailing “imperial mobilization”
and therefore pose any threat whatsoever to their plans.

From
the propaganda of Islamofascism to domestic
police state was one short jump in this slick game of “imperial
mobilization”.

The
exercise of primacy always is. And the role of the Mighty Wurlitzer,
as we can now appreciate, is indispensable across the entire spectrum
of social engineering to get people to consent to what is happening
to them! Please refer back to the statements made by Aldous Huxley in
his talk in 1961 quoted above: 'Well, it seems to me that the
nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is
precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole series
of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have
always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people
actually to love their servitude!'

The
perpetual 'war on terror' is not mere happenstance and over-reaction
to catastrophic terrorism as some of empire's leading detractors too
innocent of knowledge gullibly argue. The evidence presented
here demonstrates it to be diabolically premeditated in no less a
measure than the Third Reich's march to Lebensraum after the
full disclosure of their intent in Mein
Kampf. In both cases, the public had to be
mobilized since “Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization.” In our case, Lebensraum is world
government, and as reasoned by Bertrand
Russell, “World government could only be kept in being by
force.” (Bertrand Russell, Impact of Science on Society
Ch. 2, pg. 37)

The
Hegelian Dialectic Militant Islam vs. Moderate Islam will surely go
down in history as among the greatest enablers of war, rivaling and
perhaps surpassing both Communism vs. Fascism and Communism vs.
Capitalism of the twentieth century. It is their legatee for the
twenty-first century. As previously noted, it is already called
“World War IV”. The blood stains accumulated on all the
saintly hands enabling it, as of those prosecuting it, won't be
cleansed by all the perfumes of Arabia while they sleep holily in
bed! (Shakespeare MacBeth) Fortunate are
those who at least experience PTSD and can't sleep holily in bed (see
Zahir Ebrahim, Letter:
A Cure for America’s War Veterans who have fertilized the 'arc
of crisis' in Muslim blood).

The
Hegelian Dialectic Militant Islam vs. Moderate Islam however
is still designed to play a multifaceted role beyond the prima facie
one of each of its individual components.

The
mantra of “reform Islam” is the more pernicious of the
two. While “militant Islam” has seditiously enabled
police states in the West which all can experience themselves without
having to read about it, “moderate Islam” is intended to
enable the new world religion for these police states which few among
the public are able to apprehend just yet.

Many
useful idiots who play their role like actors on stage, some
believing in the promise of “moderate Islam”, have little
understanding of the entire show, their script only being for Act II.
Act I was obviously “militant Islam” in this Hegelian
Dialectic.

Acts
III and IV which are coming up next after the intermission for which
the stage is now being set, is to harvest the calculated subversion
of all established religions, specifically the religion of Islam, to
pave the way for the introduction of Secular Humanism – the new
religion of world Government (see Zahir Ebrahim, Islam
vs. Secular Humanism and World Government).

Full
Spectrum Primacy is the underpinning of all power calculus. Be it
of the State, just the full title of Zbigniew Brzezinski's
aforementioned book betrays what's already obvious: “The
Grand Chessboard – American Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Imperatives”. Or be it of the controlling oligarchy, which
is also already obvious, and for which books upon books of respected
establishmentarian scholars like Professor
Carroll Quigley's “Tragedy and Hope”, openly
disclose their overarching agenda being world government (see Zahir
Ebrahim, Of
Ostriches and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order
).

Empiricism
confirms these facts.

The
Hegelian Dialectic of Dissent

Having
now perceptively understood the subtle, almost undetectably
precise imperial craftsmanship of Bernard Lewis et. al., which forms
the crucial seed for implanting the “doctrinal motivation
and intellectual commitment” necessary for sustaining
“imperial mobilization”
via the Hegelian Dialectic “militant Islam” vs. “moderate
Islam”,it should not be surprising to
discover that even the steward of public conscience for the West,
Noam Chomsky, judged Bernard Lewis to be “just a vulgar
propagandist”!

In
a revealing interview on CBC, at just about that time:

'...
now, until Bernard Lewis tells us that, and that's only one piece
of a long story, we know that he is just a vulgar propagandist and
not a scholar. So yes, as long as we are supporting harsh brutal
governments, blocking democracy and development, because of our
interest in controlling the oil resources in the region, there
will be a campaign of hatred against us!' --- Interview to Evan
Solomon, CBC, part-2, minute 5:50, December
9, 2003,

But
in furthering our forensic and critical study of the Dynamics of
Mantra Creation solely on the anvil of empirical political science,
it is even more instructional to observe the omissions and
commissions in Noam Chomsky's own vaunted dissent as “arguably
the most important intellectual alive” (NYT). The disease
of deception is evidently infectious among that clan.

Noam
Chomsky himself continued to echo from the very day of September 11,
2001, and still maintains so in this tenth year of 9/11, that Osama
Bin Laden and Al Qaeda carried out that day of infamy upon
which all matters 'War on Terror' hinge!

Thus,
strangely enough, despite all his famous dissent, Noam Chomsky has
exactly managed to echo Bernard Lewis', Samuel Huntington's, the
Pentagon's, the White House's, the incumbent as well as all living
former presidents of the sole superpower, the Israelis', and the
world Zionists' collective mantra of “Islamofascists”
being the perpetrators of 9/11.

Noam
Chomsky is of course, also the most outspoken champion of Wikileaks
in his otherwise erudite disagreements with his opposite numbers in
the establishment.

All
this public fracas of dissent against the establishment is somewhat
akin to the American and Russian spies strategically collaborating
with each other despite their often antagonist tactical missions, for
the greater common good of the military-industrial complexes of both
nations during the Cold War. When we perceptively read the works of
Anthony Sutton, Carroll Quigley, and W. Cleon Skousen, it becomes
obvious that the uber-capitalists and the uber-communists where in
fact covertly collaborating at crucial core nexuses despite all their
overt WWF wrestling style public antagonisms. Both serving the
interests of the same financiers. In other words, at the highest
levels of social control, there is evidently no difference of
overarching agendas among its seemingly antagonistic players, each
one of them merely playing a theatrical public role. Shakespeare
aptly dramatized it in As you like it:

'All
the world's a stage,

And
all the men and women merely players:

They
have their exits and their entrances;

And
one man in his time plays many parts,

His
acts being seven ages.'

It
should now be self-evident that Bernard Lewis and Noam Chomsky
together, while seemingly cogent opposites, in fact represent the
class of counterpoint tunes of the Mighty Wurlitzer which nicely
bookend all public discourse between the artificial bifurcation of
Right and Left, Conservative and Liberal, Establishmentarian and
Rebel, Totalitarian and Anarchist, Consent and Dissent. It is the two
antipodes of a fabricated Hegelian Dialectic to respectively engineer
both consent and dissent in order to sustain “imperial
mobilization”.

Noam
Chomsky himself argues the veracity of this observation in his own
erudite manner:

'The
smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit
the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate
within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident
views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going
on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being
reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.'

and
yet, he just as willingly participates in it.

Thus,
observe that Chomsky too echoes that there is a 'Muslim Rage', but
instead of it being deemed “irrational” like Bernard
Lewis posits in his “vulgar
propagandist” scholarship, Noam Chomsky calls it a
rational rage, a “blowback” to American foreign policy
and the history of American political aggression! See Chomsky's money
minting booklet “911” by Seven Stories Press; and how it
was cobbled together in “The
Closet Capitalist”,
where the Hoover Institution critic observed: “Chomsky’s
marketing efforts shortly after September 11 give new meaning to the
term war profiteer. In the days after the tragedy, he raised his
speaking fee from $9,000 to $12,000 because he was suddenly in
greater demand.”

While
dissent which retains the core-lies of empire when vehemently
critiquing its effects is typical of all prominent controlled assets,
in this instance of “arguably the most important
intellectual alive”, it would perhaps be more apropos to
give it the same epithet that Noam Chomsky anointed Bernard Lewis
with. Just to call a spade a spade – and no more.

Who
else echoes that same “vulgar
propagandist's” core-lie of empire, of 9/11 being
invasion from abroad and the work of “militant Islam”, in
deep consonance with Bernard Lewis, the Pentagon, the White House,
and the neo-con think-tankers? Surprise, surprise, it is the other
patron saint of latter day dissent, Congressman Ron Paul, echoing
exactly Noam Chomsky's theme of 9/11 being a “blowback”
by malcontent Muslims. Ron Paul's absurdities are dismantled in My
beef with the stellar congressman Hon. Ron Paul.

As
a Muslim, I hope I might be forgiven if I observe some ground floor
reality check to put all this specious
“blowback” in hegemonic context. I don't see any such
naturally percolating “blowback” rage in any significant
tenor in any Muslim country despite what the white
man's burden
has done to us worldwide, except perhaps in the three nations
militarily occupied by Israel and the United States today, Palestine,
Iraq, and Afghanistan. Even there, all I see are some manufactured
“insurgents” being “tickled” into expressing
a manufactured rage on demand. This is deconstructed in great detail
in the two comprehensive reports Manufacturing
Dissent
and Insurgency vs. Counter-Insurgency
( http://tinyurl.com/Insurgency-Counterinsurgency
).

Suffice
it to expose here this sham of “blowback” very briefly.
The Director of the CIA, Michael Hayden, openly expressed the
empire's modus operandi of “tickling”
terrorists into existence thusly: “We
use military operations to excite the enemy, prompting him to
respond. In that response we learn so much”. When
the poor victims and their unfortunate survivors are thus
sufficiently “tickled” with the inconsolable loss
of their loved ones under the world's mightiest superpower's barbaric
“shock and awe”, they become prime harvest for
empire's other long running mantra, “God
is on your side”
(where God changes sides at will as expedient – see
Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization
for details).

That
harvest of malcontents is managed by local intelligence handlers and
the Pentagon's Black-ops, to steer the “tickled” patsies
natural lust for justified revenge on the aggressors onto
pre-selected local targets. The US Army field manual cited above is
apropos to quote once again as a reminder that this is indeed how the
world of hegemony actually works and this report on the Mighty
Wurlitzer isn't a James Bamford novel: “US Army Intelligence
must have the means of launching special operations which will
convince host country governments and public opinion of the reality
of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence should seek to
penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special assignments,
with the task of forming special action groups among the most radical
elements of the insurgency.”

Running
false-flag operations in this way by setting up diversionary suicidal
patsies harvested from “among
the most radical elements of the insurgency”, while
the more precision oriented lethal hit is handled covertly by the
skilled Black-Ops, becomes a breeze. This is of course the empiricism
of all major assassinations of political leaders worldwide –
compartmentalized disposable patsies independently working on narrow
tasks for a common boss, often unbeknownst to each other. That is the
prime modus operandi to fabricate the terrorist acts – called
“insurgency”. That's the sum total of the “blowback”
of vaunted dissent narrators like Ron Paul and Noam Chomsky, and the
new dissent chiefs like Paul Craig Roberts who, after having his fill
of 900 mice, now wants to lead the mice against the primacy of the
feline predators (see Zahir Ebrahim, Rebuttal
to Paul Craig Roberts': 'Washington Arrogance has Fomented a Muslim
Revolution').

Once
the “insurgency” is crafted, the organs of state, the
military, the police, the intelligentsia, the media, the pundits, all
across the world all naturally focus on the visible terrorist act of
these patsies and their poor victims! Since that is all that the
public is permitted to see by the Mighty Wurlitzer, the empire's next
move is naturally sanctioned. That is called “counter-insurgency”.
Some call it invasion and occupation. That is also the mechanism of
the super-terrorism of 9/11 in a nutshell – diversionary
tactics employed as shadow play which was propagandized by the Mighty
Wurlitzer worldwide, while the WTC towers were expertly and with
military precision brought down with controlled demolition of some
kind. The intimate dynamics of mid-wifery between insurgency and
counter-insurgency can sustain “imperial mobilization”
indefinitely!

Returning
back to the “vulgar
propagandist”(I keep that epithet in quotes
deliberately to emphasize the fact that apart from its veracity, it's
also the product of WWF wrestling), we already see the
empirical results of the uncannily predictive clairvoyance of
America's and Israel's greatest establishmentarians concerning
'Islamic Terror' which goes by many names including “blowback”.

So,
ought the public to take the superlative masters of discourse and the
assorted “vulgar propagandist” a tad more seriously when
they initially spew new absurdities en route to successful mantra
creation years in advance? And, before its eventual harvesting under
the cataclysmic shock-effects of the “new pearl harbor”,
makes their predictive boast: “They will not be alone,
and many others will suffer with them”,
an unalterable grotesque reality du jour?

One
of course already observes some of that Bernard Lewis' sponsored
clairvoyant suffering of the innocent in America itself. While its
own body-count is minuscule in comparison to Iraq, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, others experiencing 'revolutions' and 'democracy' in the
Middle East, not to mention PTSD suffered by its veterans which too
pales in comparison to what the valiant have wrecked upon the
'untermenschen' (see Letter
to Editor: PTSD and its Cure),
one with eyes wide open substantially notes that:

the
American national debt is soaring because of its perpetual 'War on
Terror' and the financial malfeasance of its financial elite;

its
bankruptcies and joblessness have shattered the 'American Dream' of
its public;

its
de-industrialization by having off-shored all its manufacturing and
production capacity is at an all time peak;

the
mighty superpower is now a police-state the likes of which was
hitherto only presaged in fictional narratives like George Orwell's
1984;

and
the once mighty industrial nation may be merged into a larger
supra-national regional entity similar to the EU as a consequence of
all these crises conditions.

Can
one therefore, perceptively not surmise that the deceased Ali Baba's
replacement nemesis will be a Super Ali Baba Plus Plus to
complete the job started by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Israeli
Intelligence agents' clairvoyance? What can this new threat possibly
be that it will even eclipse Osama Bin Laden in his magical prowess?

Can
the public shrewdly anticipate and prepare for the next boogeyman
based on the tunes now being played by the Mighty Wurlitzer, rather
than be shell-shocked into acquiescence by its phantasmic unveiling?
Just as the world was, and still is, shell-shocked into acquiescence
due to the Catastrophic
Terrorism
of 9/11
which, like the Pearl Harbor, inevitably divided our past and our
future into ‘before’ and ‘after’.

One
often hears it stated in the news and in the Western governments'
increasingly draconian regulations to keep their public safe from
terrorists, that 9/11 changed everything. Well, the super 9/11 of the
Super Ali Baba Plus Plus so clairvoyantly predicted by George W.
Bush, “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison”
(Bush White House, Feb.
13, 2008)!

Can
one intelligently not data-mine propaganda itself, in the backdrop of
the Mighty Wurlitzer's unhidden motivations and agendas, to
accurately perceive and preempt what's up next?

The
following passage from the 2500 years old Art
of War
is pertinent backdrop to the aforementioned chutzpah of empire –
a zeitgeist in which the scholars of empire announce their intentions
brazenly years in advance, while the detractors of empire excel in
the ex post facto narrations of what is
already a fait accompli after the “history's actors”
have acted and created “new realities”. The
instruments of empire award their own antagonists high honors and
great accolades for their bold rehearsal and dissection of histories
amidst the fawning adulation of all their followers having their new
'ah hah' and 'never again' moments for the first time in their life.
And the cycle repeats again and again for each new act of the
“history's actors”:

'8.
To see victory only when it is within the ken of the common herd is
not the acme of excellence.

9.
Neither is it the acme of excellence if you fight and conquer and the
whole Empire says, "Well done!"

10.
To lift an autumn hair is no sign of great strength; to see the sun
and moon is no sign of sharp sight; to hear the noise of thunder is
no sign of a quick ear.'

Paying
particular attention to item 10., one may conclude that to perceive
and anticipate in a timely manner that which is not obvious to others
leads to many tactical as well as strategic advantages, both in the
battle of hegemony and secrecy, and, in the battle against tyranny.
Which is why the public and their lauded dissent chiefs are always,
but always, kept busy in idiotic puppetshows by the Machiavelli when
it is most essential that they be shrewdly sighted.

Public
preemption can be effective in derailing
imperial mobilization
only BEFORE it becomes a fait accompli. Ex post facto, when the
public eventually wakes up to ascertain that it was indeed all a
puppetshow, it is inevitably too late to do
anything about the matter except to “study” what the
“history's actors” have left behind! Obsessing
with the previous fait accompli
when dissent chiefs lead the effort, evidently, is also a calculated
part of Machiavelli. The principle of temporal urgency in maintaining
utmost deception (and secrecy) while “new realities”
are being planned, orchestrated, and harvested, was articulated by
Niccolò Machiavelli in The
Prince.
The modern day version of this predatory statecraft is the National
Security Council Directive NSC 10/2 for creating cover stories and
red herrings alongside covert operations. See Anatomy
of Conspiracy
Theory
( http://tinyurl.com/cognitive-diversity
).

As
part of that plan to deflect public attention, those attempting to
see through its fog of deception when a fait accompli can still be
averted – before missiles have left their silos, before pen has
been put to tortuous legalisms to sanction tyranny – are
variously labeled as 'kooks', 'conspiracy theorists', 'delusional',
'denier',
etc., their efforts infiltrated and subverted (as in cointelpro),
and their energies defocussed by introducing what's cynically called
“beneficial cognitive
diversity” (see Cass
Sunstein,
and this counterpoint
to dissent-chief David Ray Griffin's “eureka” moment on
Cass Sunstein's “Conspiracy
Theories”).

So
What's Next according to Project Humanbeingsfirst?

The
Alien-UFO Agenda is one such future fait accompli in the works which
can still be averted by the public becoming rationally informed about
the demonic art of the Mighty Wurlitzer. The fact that:

the
fact that the FBI recently made available a 1950 Roswell
UFO memo
lending “UFOs” a legitimacy in the gullible mind by way
of it being held as a supposed “state-secret” for these
past sixty years ;

the
fact that US military is even playing war-games to interdict
UFOs
(USAF couldn't interdict 9/11 airplanes and are therefore
determined, one surmises, to not fail against an alien UFO
technology that is advanced enough to visit earth from another
galaxy) ;

the
fact that there is a pertinent office at the United Nations,
UNOOSA,
with “the plan to make Unoosa the co-ordinating
body for dealing with alien encounters [which] will be debated by UN
scientific advisory committees and should eventually reach the
body’s general assembly”, and a special UN
Ambassador
has been “tasked with co-ordinating humanity’s
response if and when extraterrestrials make contact” ;

and
the uptick in other bogus
and absurd conversations
on Aliens and UFO even appearing in the mainstream media, not to
mention its unrelenting repetition in the so called “alternate
media” and on the internet ;

all
indicate that its unveiling time is likely approaching near.

The
reaction to this super nemesis too will surely also be launched with
“either you are with us, or with the aliens” false
dialectics!

If
the public can preempt that propaganda by focussing on unraveling the
many facets and scenarios on what they Machiavellianly
plan to do BEFORE they enact them, the vile psy-ops can surely be
defeated BEFORE it becomes the new established “facts” on
the ground for the globalists' coup de
grâce: the final restructuring of the planet into
world
government
( http://tinyurl.com/ftworldgov).

Caption
The
Next Global Threat? A Super Ali Baba Plus Plus arriving in UFOs to
terrify all mankind into uniting under the rule of one-world government?
(The U.S. Air Force first began experimenting with flying
saucers in the 1950s. Why - to deceive the former USSR, or, to induce
global mass
panic?
See Hadley
Cantril
)

Caption
Earth must prepare for close encounter with aliens, say scientists
UN should co-ordinate plans for dealing with extraterrestrials –
and we can't guarantee that aliens will be friendly Evolution on
alien worlds is likely to be Darwinian, which may mean
extraterrestrials share our tendencies for violence and
exploitation. (Image via UK Guardian, 10 January 2011 Photograph:
Rex)

Caption
'Proof of (alien) life? A copy of the 1950 memo that recounts the
discovery of flying saucers and aliens in New Mexico. The memo has
been published on the FBI website' --- UK
Daily Mail 9th April 2011.

A
more perceptive caption however would read: 'The Art of the
Mighty Wurlitzer: How to fabricate Aliens and UFOs Myths using the
ploy of leaking State-Secrets'

“If
suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species
from another planet,”President Ronald Reagan had read
out loud from his script at the United Nations General Assembly
podium in 1987, “in our obsession with antagonisms of
the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of
humanity. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us
recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our
differences worldwide would vanish, if we were facing an alien
threat from outside this world!” --- President
Ronald Reagan, Speaking at the UN General Assembly, September 21,
1987

“It
should be as statistical as human nature, for example, that there's
going to be good guys and bad guys,” says Dr. Travis
Taylor, who's with the U.S. Space and Missile Command Department and
has worked with the Department of Defense and NASA for 20 years.

“What
we would hope is that the good guys show up first, and that would be
really nice. But the point of this wasn't to debate whether they
are or they aren't, it's what happens if they did. Do we have a
plan? What type of plan should we put together, and how would we
defend the planet?” Taylor has also written the handbook
for harrying aliens, An Introduction to Planetary Defense.

Lt.
Col. Brian De Toy, director of defense and strategic studies program
at West Point, doesn't buy the premise. “I am a skeptical
believer in miracles. So a year ago right now I was in Iraq, and I'm
more worried about Iraq and Afghanistan right now and the aliens
that I'm dealing with there. And so right now, I'm pretty skeptical
about the others.”'
--- National Geographic, Reported by Boston Herald May 17, 2011

'Aliens
might have souls and could choose to be baptised if humans ever met
them, a Vatican scientist said today. The official also
dismissed intelligent design as “bad theology” that had
been “hijacked” by American creationist fundamentalists.

Guy
Consolmagno, who is one of the pope's astronomers, said he would be
“delighted” if intelligent life was found among the
stars. “But the odds of us finding it, of it being intelligent
and us being able to communicate with it – when you add them
up it's probably not a practical question.”

Speaking
ahead of a talk at the British Science Festival in Birmingham
tomorrow, he said that the traditional definition of a soul was to
have intelligence, free will, freedom to love and freedom to make
decisions. “Any entity – no matter how many
tentacles it has – has a soul.” Would he baptise
an alien? “Only if they asked.”' --- UK
Guardian 17 Sep 2010

'Mazlan
Othman, a Malaysian astrophysicist, is set to be tasked with
co-ordinating humanity’s response if and when
extraterrestrials make contact. Aliens who landed on earth and
asked: “Take me to your leader” would be directed
to Mrs Othman. ... But Professor Stephen Hawking has warned that
alien interlopers should be treated with caution. He said: “I
imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the
resources from their home planet. The outcome for us would be much
as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t
turn out very well for the Native Americans.”' --- UK
Telegraph 26 Sep 2010

PROPAGANDA
REDUX

ASK
YOURSELF TO TEST YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU HAVE JUST LEARNED

Is
it not strange that the US Military is openly playing “war
games” for the absurd possibility of an Alien Attack within
just 25 years of President
Ronald Reagan
expressing the Beneficial Consequences of a Hypothetical Alien
Threat From Outside This World speaking at the UN General
Assembly, Sept. 21, 1987? Is it not absurd that they even appoint a
UN Ambassador to greet the aliens with “souls”
seeking to be baptised when they ask earthlings in English
“Take
me to your leader”
(sic!)? What motivation drives the Hard Road to World Order which
continually requires crafting new fabled threats, new absurdities,
new wars, new crises? Fabricating a public discourse on an absurd
fantasy as if it's something real by couching it in the veneer of
science (or declassified State-Secrets/whistleblowing) and then
reacting to that invention at supra-national levels from the United
Nations to the Catholic Church, only legitimizes such discourse thus
setting the stage for the later creation of a new insurmountable
global threat, the Clash of Planets. If political scientists are to
be believed on the utility of diabolical protocols for “imperial
mobilization”, then, “that exercise requires a
high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and
patriotic gratification.” Its doctrinal seeds must be
planted years in advance. This too will surely also be launched with
“either you are with us, or with the aliens”! ---
The
Agenda Behind Aliens and UFOs.

In
order to perceptively comprehend the psychological basis of such
absurd and fabricated threats which instill existential fears:

whose
import to enabling “imperial mobilization” was
clearly envisaged by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1996 in The
Grand
Chessboard:

“It
is also a fact that America is too democratic at home to be
autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially
its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of
power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in
conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of
domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is defense
spending), and the human sacrifice (casualties even among
professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization.” (pgs. 35-36) ;

whose
raison d'être as the primary method for advancing “the
"national interest" by means of organized violence”,
was taken as axiomatic in the 1963-64 secret study reported in the
1967 book The
Report From Iron Mountain:

“It
must be emphasized that the precedence of a society's war-making
potential over its other characteristics is not the result of the
"threat" presumed to exist at any one time from other
societies. This is the reverse of the basic situation; "threats"
against the "national interest" are usually created or
accelerated to meet the changing needs of the war system. ... The
military, or ostensible function of the war system requires no
elaboration; it serves simply to defend or advance the "national
interest" by means of organized violence. It is often
necessary for a national military establishment to create a need for
its unique powers—to maintain the franchise, so to speak.
And a healthy military apparatus requires "exercise," by
whatever rationale seems expedient, to prevent its atrophy.”
(pgs. 31,33) ;

whose
utility for effectively embarking on the “military
transformation” required to achieve “full
spectrum dominance” that wasn't “stillborn”,
was openly declared in the Project for the New American Century
(PNAC) report titled Rebuilding
America's Defenses:

“Further,
the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary
change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and
catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. ... Until the
process of transformation is treated as an enduring military mission
– worthy of constant allocation of dollars and forces –
it will remain stillborn” (pgs. 51,58) ;

“We
are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie
Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for
the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed
throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The
question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war,
assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And
they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is
known to humanity. So then, in 1909, they raised the second
question and discussed it, namely: 'How do we involve the United
States in a war?'”;

please
refer to social engineering principles in Further
Study
for Operation
Gladio,
Edward
Bernays,
Human
Resources,
and The
Prisoner
television series fable of the 1960s on mind control. That topic was at
the time clandestinely being experimented upon in secret military
laboratories as in what was later revealed of the American version of it
in CIA's
MK ULTRA. The Prisoner fable uncannily captured the
entire essence of behavior modification, from hard techniques of brain
chemistry manipulation to soft techniques of Machiavelli and perception
management. Especially watch episode “It's
your funeral”.
Also see Myth
of the Cave
in Plato's 2500 years old classic The Republic, Book VII, page
300 (book
PDF).

Closing
Arguments

There
is a lot to learn here on deliberate Machiavellian social engineering
that is not taught even in the best universities in America (and the
West), nor ever makes an appearance on CNN Headline News (and Time or
Newsweek)! What we are speaking of here, of engineering the consent
of the masses to get them to love their own servitude, far transcends
the corporate advertising and marketing techniques taught in MBA
programs which were principally pioneered by Edward Bernays. These
techniques of course also attempt to bypass the cognitive mind and
target manipulating the subconscious mind directly to sell a product,
a lifestyle, or an idea.

However,
while most recognize that advertising is a multi-billion dollar
business and accept it as a matter of for-profit corporate modernity,
few are aware of an order of magnitude more resources being
perversely spent by tax-exempt foundations, and the tax-payers (quite
unbeknownst to themselves of course), on far more diabolical aspects
of social engineering for “getting
people to consent to what is happening to them. Well, it seems to
me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now
faced is precisely this: that we are in process of developing a whole
series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who
have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get
people actually to love their servitude!”(please once
again refer to Aldous Huxley quoted at the very beginning to refresh
your memory that I haven't made all this up)

Advertising
Age’s 2008
Marketer of the Year award
to President Obama for his election campaign of the “Change”
mantra, and the Nobel committee's awarding him the 2009
Nobel Peace Prize
testify to the empiricism of this observation. The American nation
easily bought that fiction of “Change”,
which was once again underscored by President Obama bombing
Libya
on the same day in 2011 that his predecessor bombed Iraq in 2003!

How
did the American public buy that fiction? Once again, please refer
back to the very beginning of this report and to Edward Bernays: “We
are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas
suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”

This
ignorance and gullibility among the college-educated modern public is
despite the fact that Western academe is at the forefront of the vast
majority of behavior control and social engineering research studies,
often funded by, or in collaboration with, Western intelligence,
military, and private tax-exempt foundations such as the Rockefeller
Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and Ford Foundation. The highly
compartmentalized nature of such research ensures that few students
and professors in on the ground breaking studies into human behavior
can ever glean the bigger picture towards which they work so
diligently to respectively earn their Ph.D. and research funding!
Those few who do comprehend are invariably engaged with empire in the
largely unhidden orchestration of social engineering. Or, are quickly
recruited as agents and assets of the Mighty Wurlitzer.

Mighty
Wurlitzer has no limit for its territory. The newsmedia,
entertainment, academe, political parties, religious institutions,
think-tanks, private foundations, government-funded organizations,
and non-governmental organization (NGOs) alike, all house its agents
and assets. And they each play their own tunes on their own
specialized instruments under the supreme conduction of the Mighty
Wurlitzer. The most notable among these is religion. Although the
layman does not normally associate the pastor, rabbi, alim, mullah,
swami, etc., with propaganda organs of state, but religion is in fact
the most affected by the Mighty Wurlitzer – all throughout
history. If we just reflect on the fact that more than three quarters
of the world's people espouse some faith, the easiest cognitive
infiltration and behavior control is
directly through faith. The report: Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization
( http://tinyurl.com/Islam-Socialization
), and the following challenge to a pious Muslim cleric who issued a
600-page
Fatwa
on Terrorism
in the Service of Empire
( http://tinyurl.com/Fatwa-Terrorism-Qadri
), indubitably illustrate this universal fact.

Today,
fact and fiction have been merged to such an alarming degree with
adept perception control that to be able to rationally separate them,
to tell what is mere imagery of the Mighty Wurlitzer vs. the actual
interconnected causal reality (cause and effect) of statecraft, can
be as uncongenial to the cognitive mind as depicted by Plato for the
prisoners bred in the underground cave since birth. The fact that the
most brilliant minds remain unable to tell that 9/11 was an
'Operation Canned Goods' even ten years into its vile enactment while
America descends into a police-state in presumed reaction to it,
demonstrates that it is not the brain hardware which is
malfunctioning, but the brain software!

The
inculcation of belief in authority figures and “experts”
has reached pandemic proportions in the West. Indoctrination is today
perhaps the greatest public plague afflicting the mightiest
superpower on earth, a direct consequence of “dumbing down”
the public in the name of higher education to craft self-obsessed
economic widgets, narrow specialists, and superficial generalists for
the Technetronic Era. The continued success of the Mighty Wurlitzer
in “persuading” the public to accept absurdities to get
them 'United We Stand' singularly relies on, and feeds off, this
aspect of modernity. See The
Ivy League Morons Syndrome.
Also see the deconstruction of Bernard de Mandeville's “The
Fable of the Bees” in The
Seduction of Science and Technology.

There
is an undeniable categorical imperative before the Western peoples
today. With the escalating belligerence towards Iran and the
strategic dismantling of Pakistan palpably on the visible horizon,
will the profoundly innocent of knowledge in the West
allow themselves to be fooled once again into more criminal
aggression upon civilian populations in the name of 'war on
terrorism'. Or, will the people choose to not be (willingly) deceived
by the Mighty Wurlitzer's many ruses at every level which continually
justify the core axioms of “imperial mobilization” by way
of deception? See Peoples' Guilt and America’s Profound
Shame (
http://prisonersofthecave.blogspot.com/2007/04/preface.html#Americas-Profound-Shame
).

It
is precisely to invoke that acquiescence to premeditated fait
accompli that Zbigniew Brzezinski self-servingly quoted in the
opening pages of his seminal 1970 book Between Two Ages –
America's Role in the Technetronic Era, the following specious
rationalization for the turmoil to be purposely inflicted upon the
'lesser' humanity. The diabolically fabricated Hegelian Dialectic as
the means to usher in one-world
government,
and attributing that manufactured zeitgeist to just the nature of
transformation between two ages (for which nothing could be done
about since the human misery which it entailed was natural and
inevitable):

“Human
life is reduced to real suffering, to hell, only when two ages, two
cultures and religions overlap. . . . There are times when a whole
generation is caught in this way between two ages, two modes of life,
with the consequence that it loses all power to understand itself and
has no standard, no security, no simple acquiescence.” ---
HERMANN HESSE, Steppenwolf (lede quote by Zbigniew Brzezinski in
Between Two Ages, pg. 7, book
PDF).

As
an establishmentarian hectoring hegemon, Brzezinski again invoked the
same sort of self-serving rationalization to perpetuate American
Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. He began his subsequent
1996 book The Grand Chessboard with the chauvinist sentence:
“Hegemony is as old as mankind.” Thus, by
the logic of it, making the rest of the book a recipe for the
exercise of America's uniquely unchallenged global power, and
“especially its capacity for military intimidation”,
as the most natural human legacy for any supremacist nation to
pursue. Nothing could, or ought, to be done about that predatory
instinct for organized violence since “Hegemony is as old as
mankind.” And therefore, Brzezinski naturally proffered in
his chauvinist conclusion, “In brief, the U.S. Policy
goals must be un-apologetically twofold: to perpetuate America's own
dominant position for at least a generation and preferably
longer,...” (Ibid., pg. 215; see Prisoners
of the Cave,
Chapter 1
).

The
report Of
Ostriches
and Rebels on The Hard Road to World Order,
examines how that specious recipe book for America's predatory
primacy, as syntactically sugared war-mongering as it is, is itself
only half the truth. As the Jewish proverb suggests, 'a half truth
is a full lie'. And as the Mighty Wurlitzer knows, in order to be
effective, the lie is different at every level.

Contrary
to Zbigniew Brzezinski's erudite prose which underlies the many
compositions of the Mighty Wurlitzer, as the generation caught
between two ages on the Grand Chessboard, we, the bearers of “Human
life”, have neither lost the power to “understand”,
nor lost the power to overturn the coercive “simple
acquiescence” to artificially induced transition period of
“real suffering”. That understanding, and
overturning, is the raison d'être for this document.

When
Primacy
and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
to orchestrate a one-world
government
is the ingrained doctrine among the 'ubermensch' and
their instruments, it is trivial to come up with any logic, any
rationalism for even the most atrocious barbarism inflicted upon the
'untermenschen'. Convince the public of absurdities and one can get
them to acquiesce to any atrocity – from outright murderous
invasion of other nations to torturing their civilians in the most
horrendous conditions, to getting their own citizens to accept giving
up their civil liberties without a sigh. Nothing new here –
'standard 007 issue' of the hectoring hegemons! That same Mighty
Wurlitzer and its paymasters however would be chewing on cyanide
capsules in another situation. It is best not to forget that. Baboons
wear no clothes – even when they steal the sunglasses.

Further
Study

As
this is mainly a self-study note – because satisfying one's
curiosity and moral imperatives by performing a modicum of due
diligence is the order of business rather than merely reading
digested excerpts or believing 'experts' – the following
suggested minimal self-study will be useful in comprehending the
pernicious role of intelligence assets which perpetually infiltrate
the media and the academe. You will learn how society is manipulated
in the direction of its ruling-elite's agendas, how ordinary peoples
serving in positions of influence in the institutions of the
ruling-elite involuntarily succumb to freely promulgating the
oligarchs' agendas while remaining unaware of it, and most
importantly, why it is almost impossible for ordinary decent peoples
too busy pursuing their 'American Dreams', to perceive this
sophisticated manipulation which goes on 24x7.

5)
Zahir Ebrahim, Prisoners of the Cave, 2003, Chapter 6: How
does the US News Media end up towing the line?
( http://tinyurl.com/nnk26a
). The Military-Industrial-Media corporate complex with interlocked
board memberships, and opaque stock ownership by institutional
investors the largest of which is the U.S. Government (see
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports at http://CAFR1.com
), represent the same vested interests which control the Policy
Planning of the CIA and the Pentagon as the Primacy Imperatives of
the sole superpower, the United States of America. These interlocking
for-profit corporations and their majority stock-holders who profit
from war, primacy, and hegemony, also own and control the news media,
news distribution, the entertainment industry, and essentially all
outlets of exercising sophisticated Hegellian Dialectics of Mass
Deception upon a not too knowledgeable population. With increasing
consolidation of information synthesis, packaging, and delivery into
fewer and fewer corporate hands owned and controlled by a handful of
people, the ideological alignment of their interests makes a sham of
the much touted 'fourth pillar of democracy'. Therefore,
operationally speaking, the government is almost trivially able to
influence news to manufacture consent for its primacy imperatives in
the same way that the oligarchs are able to select the government to
implement their agendas in an entirely bipartisan way. Rather than
the White House issue daily directives to the editorial staff of
major news organizations as in any vanilla dictatorship, the
editorial staff and the corporate owners a priori know “All
the news that's fit to print.” With the right placement of
assets and stooges in the news organizations, the tactical
synchronization of worldwide propaganda is made superlatively
effective – as the 'War on Terror' against 'Militant Islam'.
Also see Chapter 4: The
Role of Mass Media in Empire Building
( http://tinyurl.com/m5mbrl
).

6)
Additionally, see the watered down 'non-conspiratorial' model of
self-censorship to stay gainfully employed, and the self-selection of
like-minded blind-sighted journalist-editorial-staff in any news
organization as per the often unstated overarching imperatives of the
news organization in which one automatically knows what flourishes
and what doesn't, in Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent,
1986. Chomsky's treatise is applicable more to the incestuous
self-censorship of shallow but well-intentioned mental-midgets –
the bulwark of the newsmedia – rather than the calculating
mercenarial agendists and vulgar propagandists selectively planted in
key positions for psy-ops by the 'Mighty Wurlitzer'. More insidious
than “manufacturing consent” however, is “manufacturing
dissent”, something which Noam Chomsky has unfortunately
written little about, leaving it to his nondescript student to
unravel in “Weapons
of Mass Deception – The Master Social Science”
( http://tinyurl.com/la5bv6
). Witness the manufactured dissent in real action wherein it retains
the same core-axioms as manufactured consent, in “My
beef with the stellar congressman Hon. Ron Paul”
September 15, 2009 ( http://tinyurl.com/nn6dth
). Also see “Open
Letter to Hon. Ron Paul Supporters”
October 29, 2008 ( http://tinyurl.com/lawra8
).

9)
See the spin on Hugh Wilford's book the Mighty Wurlitzer by
Michael Warner in Intelligence in Recent Public Literature, as
if willful public deception for a 'greater cause' was only the moral
and categorical imperative of the past very judiciously engaged in by
superlative 'presidents and key Congressmen [who] held “a
fairly sophisticated point of view” that understood that “the
public exhibition of unorthodox views was a potent weapon against
monolithic communist uniformity of action.” The CIA subsidized
freedom in order to expose the lies of tyrants—and then winced
silently when that freedom led to an occasional bite on America’s
hand.' The full URL is revealing:
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol52no2/pdf/U-%20Studies%2052-2%20-Jun08-MightyWurlitzer-Web.pdf
( http://tinyurl.com/nrn8yq
) The ex post facto deconstruction of Jessica Lynch Media Myth-Making
during the Iraq War, in the aftermath of the fait accompli of Iraq
invasion by the UK
Guardian
and Journalism.org,
tell a different tale from Michael Warner's, one right out of
Zbigniew Brzezinski's cookbook for “imperial mobilization”
which “requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation,
intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification.” As
pointed out by the UK Guardian, “Jessica Lynch became an
icon of the war. An all-American heroine, the story of her capture by
the Iraqis and her rescue by US special forces became one of the
great patriotic moments of the conflict. It couldn't have happened at
a more crucial moment, when the talk was of coalition forces bogged
down, of a victory too slow in coming. Her rescue will go down as
one of the most stunning pieces of news management yet conceived.
It provides a remarkable insight into the real influence of Hollywood
producers on the Pentagon's media managers, and has produced a
template from which America hopes to present its future wars.”

Edward
Bernays on Letterman: “people will believe me more if you call
me doctor”

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6hH3roMe4w]

Century of Self

Episode
One: Happiness Machines

Episode
Two: The Engineering of Consent

Episode
Three: There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads: He Must Be
Destroyed

Episode
Four: Eight People Sipping Wine in Kettering

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ3RzGoQC4s]

10A)
More specialized psychological tools and advanced manipulation
techniques based on Edward Bernays' discovery that the irrational
human mind can easily be mobilized by propaganda for both profit as
well as nationalism, are continually explored and refined in many
think-tank places in the West under the sanitized vernacular of
“Human Relations” and “Public Relations”,
including presumably at the Tavistock
Institute in London.
Listen to Aldous Huxley's take on where mind-behavior manipulation
techniques are rapidly headed, wherein, with sufficient social
engineering control, people will simply end up loving their own
servitude, titled “The
Ultimate Revolution”
( http://tinyurl.com/ahuxley
), March 20, 1962, at UC Berkeley.

10B)
An ominously prescient depiction of the more advanced state of
behavior control and social engineering is in the allegorical British
television series of 1967 titled 'The
Prisoner'.
Watch online here.
Its seventeen episodes masterfully enacted many of the psychological
techniques of social engineering, behavior manipulation at both
conscious and subliminal levels, voluntary and involuntary mass
persuasion, and psychotropically induced mind control as in CIA's MK
ULTRA,
spanning the gamut in theories drawn from Aldous Huxley's 'Brave
New World'
to George Orwell's '1984',
and from Plato's 'The
Republic'
to Machiavelli's 'The
Prince'.
Many of these “soft” (altering the sense of perception)
as well as “hard” (altering the brain chemistry)
mind/behavior control techniques at macro social levels appear to be
in actual play in the West today. See for instance: 'The
Sovereign Man is the Real Prisoner',
which quotes from the FBI’s Counterterrorism Analysis report
titled 'Sovereign
Citizens - A Growing Domestic Threat to Law Enforcement',
the tortuous statement: “The FBI considers sovereign-citizen
extremists as comprising a domestic terrorist movement,”.
Anyone – who is not entirely stripped of commonsense and their
powers of observation that is – can easily witness that to
think independently from the herd, to resist manipulation, to
challenge official narratives, is almost getting to be typecast as
being an “unmutual” committing “thought crimes”,
a “conspiracy theorist” exhibiting signs of “mental
illness”, a “terrorist” working against the
“greater common good”, etc. See Anatomy
of Conspiracy Theory
for how it has been orchestrated in plainsight under various guises
from national security imperatives to academic eruditeness. Draconian
behavior conformance of the individual for the “greater common
good” is now directly visible even to the most blind at the
US-UK Airports where the majority of travelers, more than 99 percent,
willingly subject themselves to the false choice between X-ray
radiation or pat-down molestation without a murmur of protest. See
Body-scan
Alert - Not Suffering Indignities at Airports
( http://tinyurl.com/airportbodyscan
). Watch it here.
Today, fact and fiction have been merged to such an alarming degree
with adept perception control that to be able to rationally separate
them, to tell what is mere imagery of the Mighty Wurlitzer vs. the
actual interconnected causal reality of statecraft, can be as
uncongenial to the cognitive mind as depicted by Plato for the
prisoners bred in the underground cave since birth (see Book VII, The
Republic, page 300 book
PDF).

11A)
The capitalization upon the Psychology of Fear to implement
the 'War on Terrorism' du jour was best demonstrated in Operation
Gladio of yesteryear when self-inflicted terror by NATO's Stay
Behind Armies was used to keep the fear of Communism alive among the
skeptical public in Western Europe. Please watch the BBC Ch 02 Time
Watch 3-part series on Operation
Gladio:
part-1,
part-2,
part-3.
Despite being a much sanitized version, the BBC documentary is still
very revealing. As is already examined in “What
is War on Terror?”
( http://tinyurl.com/What-is-War-on-Terror-Zahir
), Part-3 of the Gladio documentary has the following statement
quoted from the US Army's Top Secret Field Manual:

“Top
Secret: There may be times when host country governments show
passivity or indecision in the face of Communist subversion ... US
Army Intelligence must have the means of launching special operations
which will convince host country governments and public opinion of
the reality of the insurgent danger ... US Army Intelligence should
seek to penetrate the insurgency by means of agents of special
assignments, with the task of forming special action groups among the
most radical elements of the insurgency.”

As
we have now already learned, because fear is such a potent motivator
for the masses, its fabrication over the civilian populations is, and
always has been, any military's unhidden-secret war-making advantage.
Under the military's purview which often transcends mere propaganda
and psy-ops, fear-making instruments and orchestrations spanning the
gamut from “shock and awe” to false-flag terrorism, serve
myriad functions including that of manufacturing the boogeymen who
must implement the “doctrinal motivation” whose
intellectual seeds were laid years in advance. I.e., the synthetic
Ali Baba is fabricated and/or “tickled
into existence”
to kill innocent civilians with deadly terrorism in order to lend
credibility to the mantra of “militant Islam”. A
believable pretext is thus created for the state's never ending
“counter-insurgency” operations against them in order to
protect itself and its peoples, its allies, and its infinite national
interests. Beginning with the pretext of fighting the “New
Pearl Harbor” terrorism of 9/11 which led the United States
into Afghanistan, Iraq, into the “Global
Zone of Percolating Violence”
along the 'Arc of Crisis' ( http://tinyurl.com/arc-of-crisis
), how it is being synthesized to turn Pakistan into the new Terror
Central
can be straightforwardly gleaned in the report: Insurgency
vs. Counter-Insurgency - The Decapitation of Pakistan by its own
Military!
( http://tinyurl.com/Insurgency-Counterinsurgency
).

13)
Metanoia-films.org has a 2-hour video documentary on Social
Engineering in the 20th Century, titled 'Human
Resources',
for those more inclined to watch
than read.

Human
Resources: Social Engineering in the 20th Century

[http://metanoia-films.org/human-resources/#watch]

The
amazing description of the Metanoia-films.org website in its own
words entirely captures the essential purpose of Project
Humanbeingsfirst as well: 'The Greek term for repentance,
metanoia, denotes a change of mind, a reorientation, a fundamental
transformation of outlook, of an individual's vision of the world and
of her/himself ... In the words of a second-century text, The
Shepherd of Hermas, it implies "great understanding,"
discernment. In Carl Jung's psychology, metanoia indicates a
spontaneous attempt of the psyche to heal itself of unbearable
conflict by melting down and then being reborn in a more adaptive
form.' I would add that in Islam, the actual process to acquire
that “great understanding”, that “fundamental
transformation of outlook”, that “melting down and then
being reborn”, is the severe path of jihad-un-nafs. To
overcome one's ingrained worldviews and indoctrinations is never an
easy journey even when one becomes aware of the social and
psychological forces which naturally construct Plato's Prisoners
of the Cave. Most will of course remain unaware of it throughout
their life, never mind wage a struggle to overcome it, and will
continually be manipulated into 'United We Stand' with ruling agendas
– a plight which has dogged mankind since time immemorial. A
forensic exploration of breaking out of this prison of the mind is in
my trilogy on Israel-Palestine which comprise the Pamphlet:
How To Return to Palestine.
Also see the deconstruction of “The Fable of the Bees” in
The
Seduction of Science and Technology
( http://tinyurl.com/The-Fable-of-the-Bees
).

14)
Finally, the question of reform
continually arises among the antagonists of the Mighty Wurlitzer, the
idealists,
and the “malcontents”.
They would rather pretend that some rational “reform” can
do away with the Mighty Wurlitzer altogether. The following response
to the question raised by Robert Jensen, Professor of Journalism,
“Can journalism schools be relevant in a world on the
brink?”, September 15, 2009, injects a doze of
reality-check: “Re-titling
can perhaps make the problem-space more apparent: Can journalism
schools be relevant in a New World Order of one-world government?”
( http://www.commondreams.org/views/2009/09/14/can-journalism-schools-be-relevant-world-brink
). Edward Bernays brilliant successes at mass behavior manipulation
has conclusively shown that masses are typically not motivated into
action, moral or any other, by information alone. Rather, primarily
by appeal to their irrational sub-conscious mind, to their fears, to
their suppressed desires. And, that they remain quite susceptible to
hidden emotional manipulation. Therefore, journalism's utility to
statecraft to control the masses cannot be overturned, nor reformed,
in any existing structure of governance that relies on war and
deception to rule. Journalism today is more a diabolical tool of
statecraft than of any benefit to the people. It appears to this
cynic that in order to even begin to play its theoretically assigned
role in a theoretical constitutional republic, unless the much wonted
fourth pillar of democracy – the watchdog upon the corridors of
power – adopts similar psychological tactics of the oligarchs
to manipulate core human instincts for mobilizing the masses for the
“democratic check” that is much theorized in Western
democracy, journalism is destined to largely remain a steganographic
tool of signaling and communication among the elite themselves! To
substantiate this egregious point, please see table 3 titled
“APPROXIMATE USE OF MEDIA” in Zbigniew Brzezinski's
seminal book “Between
Two Ages - America's Role in the Technetronic Era”,
page 14 (book
PDF).
The readership data for the printed press like the NYT, while
quantitatively dated, is qualitatively even more attuned to the
hypnotic reality of television mass media today whereby, while useful
advance information can sometimes be gleaned in the inside pages of
the elite's own printed press – provided one has learnt how to
parse the elite's language – it is rarely if ever present on
mass television.

15)
CNN Cold War – Profile of Zbigniew Brzezinski. 'Born on
March 28, 1928, in Warsaw, Poland, the future national security
adviser to President Carter and son of a Polish diplomat spent part
of his youth in France and Germany before moving to Canada. He
received a B.A. and M.A. in political science from McGill University,
in 1949 and 1950 respectively, and in 1953 earned his doctorate in
political science from Harvard. He taught at Harvard before moving to
Columbia University in 1961 to head the new Institute on Communist
Affairs. In 1958 he became a U.S. citizen. During the 1960s
Brzezinski acted as an adviser to Kennedy and Johnson administration
officials. Generally taking a hard line on policy toward the Soviet
Union, he was also an influential force behind the Johnson
administration's "bridge-building" ideas regarding Eastern
Europe. During the final years of the Johnson administration, he was
a foreign policy adviser to Vice President Hubert Humphrey and his
presidential campaign.

In
1973, Brzezinski became the first director of the Trilateral
Commission, a group of prominent political and business leaders and
academics from the United States, Western Europe and Japan. Its
purpose was to strengthen relations among the three regions. Future
President Carter was a member, and when he declared his candidacy for
the White House in 1974, Brzezinski, a critic of the Nixon-Kissinger
foreign policy style, became his adviser on foreign affairs. After
his victory in 1976, Carter made Brzezinski national security
adviser.

Aiming
to replace Kissinger's "acrobatics" in foreign
policy-making with a foreign policy "architecture,"
Brzezinski was as eager for power as his rival. However, his task was
complicated by his focus on East-West relations, and in a hawkish way
-- in an administration where many cared a great deal about
North-South relations and human rights. On the whole, Brzezinski was
a team player.' --- CNN Cold War - Profile Zbigniew Kazimierz
Brzezinski (snapshot from cnn.com on August 25, 2008)

Expert
Profile CSIS Counselor and Trustee, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
'Zbigniew Brzezinski is a CSIS counselor and trustee and cochairs the
CSIS Advisory Board. He is also the Robert E. Osgood Professor of
American Foreign Policy at the School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University, in Washington, D.C. He is cochair
of the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus and is a former
chairman of the American-Ukrainian Advisory Committee. He was a
member of the Policy Planning Council of the Department of State from
1966 to 1968; chairman of the Humphrey Foreign Policy Task Force in
the 1968 presidential campaign; director of the Trilateral Commission
from 1973 to 1976; and principal foreign policy adviser to Jimmy
Carter in the 1976 presidential campaign.

From
1977 to 1981, Dr. Brzezinski was national security adviser to
President Carter. In 1981 he was awarded the Presidential Medal of
Freedom for his role in the normalization of U.S.-China relations and
for his contributions to the human rights and national security
policies of the United States. He was also a member of the
President’s Chemical Warfare Commission (1985), the National
Security Council–Defense Department Commission on Integrated
Long-Term Strategy (1987–1988), and the President’s
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (1987–1989).

In
1988, he was cochairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task
Force, and in 2004, he was cochairman of a Council on Foreign
Relations task force that issued the report Iran: Time for a New
Approach. Dr. Brzezinski received a B.A. and M.A. from McGill
University (1949, 1950) and Ph.D. from Harvard University (1953). He
was a member of the faculties of Columbia University (1960–1989)
and Harvard University (1953–1960).

Dr.
Brzezinski holds honorary degrees from Georgetown University,
Williams College, Fordham University, College of the Holy Cross,
Alliance College, the Catholic University of Lublin, Warsaw
University, and Vilnius University. He is the recipient of numerous
honors and awards. His many books include America and the World:
Conversations on the Future of American Foreign Policy (2008); Second
Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower
(2007); The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership (2004);
The Geostrategic Triad: Living with China, Europe, and Russia (2001);
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic
Imperatives (1997); and The Grand Failure: The Birth and Death of
Communism in the 20th Century (1989).' --- Zbigniew Brzezinski,
Expert Profile CSIS Counselor and Trustee (snapshot from csis.org on
April 28, 2009)

Correction Footnote Brzezinski is Catholic
The heritage of Zbigniew Brzezinski is Polish-Catholic
and not Polish-Jewish as was stated in a previous version of
this report. A very unusual open-secret evidently, not mentioned in
the many Brzezinski books and articles I have read, nor on his
wikipedia page, nor in his CSIS Expert Profile reproduced above, with
the presumption flourishing in the public mind that the Polish
Brzezinski is just as Jewish as the Frankish Kissinger, but not
necessarily espousing the Zionist theology of the neocons. That
correction however, of the hectoring hegemon being Catholic instead
of Jewish, while necessary to make for the sake of accuracy, harbors
no real material change for the calculus of the grand chessboard from
its victims' perspectives. As principally, The
White Man's Burden appears Uniformly Distributed among Jews
Christians and Atheists – how can one tell the difference?
It is just as soaked in the untermensch's blood, and just as
laden in the deceptive tunes of the Mighty Wurlitzer, irrespective of
which Superman hums it. It does not matter to the dead and
destroyed people of Afghanistan that the murderer who boasted “giving
to the USSR its Vietnam War” in Muslim blood and
on Muslim soil with the synthetic doctrinal motivation of “God
is on your side”,
is Catholic rather than Jewish. However, that fact does perhaps lend
some motivational insight into the infighting among hectoring
hegemons witnessed in Bush's White House between Brzezinski and the
Jewish neocons in reference to Brzezinski's
SFRC
testimony before the US Senate in Feb 2007 quoted above. The
primordial allegiances are evidently to different base tribes –
and so the godfathers in the different families bicker in public in a
good WWF Wrestling game! But there is of course more to it
than that. As examined above, Brzezinski, the grand architect of the
great game in Central and South Asia, and also plugged into the
Vatican power-base, for reasons best understood by the oligarchy that
he evidently fronts for, appears to have pragmatically intervened in
America's invasion of Iran by that most dramatic poker play in
public. At least for the time being. That breathing space afforded to
Iran is being squandered by her in the pursuit of false bravado in
public relations games instead of developing some realpolitik full
spectrum alliances with her neighbors in real self-defence. See
Hegemony
is as old as mankind!.

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.