Benefits Of The Death Penalty Essay Examples

1554 words - 6 pages
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder. Without the death penalty, criminals would be more inclined to commit additional violent crimes. Fear of death discourages people from committing crimes. If capital punishment were carried
VIEW DOCUMENT

2800 words - 12 pages
steadily moved to more humane methods of carrying out capital punishment” (Baze v. Rees, 2008). This is the opinion of the Chief Justice, John G. Roberts, who has a powerful voice in this argument, primarily because if the death penalty is abolished it must ultimately go through the Supreme Court. Another major goal of the death penalty is to provide the victims’ families with some sort of closure, “Society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him. Crime disturbs this just order, for the criminal takes from people their lives, peace, liberties, and worldly goods in order to give himself undeserved benefits” (J. Budziszewski, 2004). In other words, these criminals deserve
VIEW DOCUMENT

1185 words - 5 pages
Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items
VIEW DOCUMENT

1792 words - 8 pages
later on that month put on trial for murder in cold blood. The verdict of the jury was that Simmons was guilty of first degree murder and was sentenced to death. Later court decisions decided that because he was a minor when he committed the murder he could not be justly put to death. In the case the final sentence was life in prison with no bail and no parole. (Bessler, 12-16 ) The excerpt above is from the book Cruel and Unusual. It later states in this book that if Simmons had received the death penalty then that would have violated his eighth and fourteenth amendment rights. Why is it that a person committing such a heinous crime could receive life in prison when another person
VIEW DOCUMENT

567 words - 2 pages
Is death the justification of a murder or are we merely subduing ourselves by performing the same heinous act? This argument had been debated for many decades and although some feel that death is the answer to a murder, there are others that find it completely barbaric. Through a careful analysis between Edward Koch's "Death and Justice" and David Bruck's "The Death Penalty", I believe Koch had the better argument in claiming that death is the justification of a murder. I feel that if someone were to kill another person, we have all rights to sentence them to a death penalty to guarantee such a horrific crime would not happen again.If someone had the courage to take the life of another then
VIEW DOCUMENT

973 words - 4 pages
Flaws of the Death Penalty
Capital Punishment has been part of the criminal justice system since as far back as 1700 B.C. However, in recent times opponents have shown the death penalty to be racist, barbaric, and in violation with the United States Constitution as "...cruel and unusual punishment." In this country, although laws governing the application of the death penalty have undergone many changes since biblical times, the punishment endures, and controversy has never been greater.
Abolitionists maintain that the state has no right to kill anyone. The right to reject life imprisonment and choose death should be respected, but it changes nothing for those who oppose the death at
VIEW DOCUMENT

1039 words - 4 pages
The Abolishment of the Death Penalty
As Americans we live in a modern republic under a government constructed to secure the rights of the people. Today’s government and judicial systems were forged by our founding fathers as they fought to establish a government free from tyranny and brutality and thereby forming a constitution based on civil liberties. Our country has grown and matured through the centuries and in effect has made changes and alterations as innovations and advancements have deemed necessary. One area where we seem to have evolved at a slower rate is in the archaic and often inhumane judicial laws of the death penalty. The death penalty, a law which strips the civil
VIEW DOCUMENT

728 words - 3 pages
1. Introduction
A. Attention Getter: Thou shall not kill, only one of the ten commandments that some individuals unfortunately can not seem to uphold. What would the world look like if we did not have an “eye for an eye” mentality? The debate about whether or not capital punishment is ethical or immoral is significant because our country is spending unnecessary amounts on death penalty executions, in which citizens do not know enough about the subject matter to disagree or protest its use. While tax payers are paying for this procedure, the death penalty poses many moral insurrections.
B. Introduce Topic: Since you all have been informed about the gruesomeness of the death penalty, I am
VIEW DOCUMENT

705 words - 3 pages
I do support the death penalty and I do not consider it cruel or unusual treatment. The Constitution itself indicates that the death penalty can be used. Amendment V of the Constitution states that “…no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law….” (U.S. Const., amend V). In other words, once a person has gone through the due process of law, his life can be taken if he is found guilty. There is a common misconception that murderers do not think about the end consequence. If that was the case, there would be more killings by police than arrests. When murderers are confronted by policeman, they normally surrender because of the threat of the
VIEW DOCUMENT

589 words - 2 pages
The Death PenaltyThe first known execution in the United States of America was of Daniel Frank, put to death in 1622 in the Colony of Virginia for the crime of theft. Since then the death penalty has almost always been a feature of the criminal justice system, first in the American colonies and then, after independence, in the U.S.Legal challenges to the death penalty culminated in a 5 to 4 U.S. Supreme Court decision Furman v. Georgia in 1972, which struck down federal and state capital punishment laws permitting wide judgment in the request of the death penalty. Characterizing these laws as "arbitrary and capricious," the majority ruled that they constituted cruel and unusual punishment
VIEW DOCUMENT

565 words - 2 pages
The Cons of the Death Penalty
“…Over 600 people were falsely convicted and 35 faced death for crimes that they did not commit…”(Johnson). The death penalty is an ineffective and expensive way of dealing justice to the American people. It is easier and cheaper to send someone to prison for life than to have them face the death penalty and be executed. Capital punishment is an unnecessary punishment because criminals are already managed at prisons.
69
The death penalty can lead to the death of innocent people. For example, “…According to a new study, serious errors occur in almost 70% of all trials leading to the death penalty…”(Leibman). This shows that if 100 people were put on
VIEW DOCUMENT

2318 words - 9 pages
of impiety is one that is difficult to argue against since for religious individuals always seem construct an argument that works in a circular manor. Therefore it is almost never possible to end a conversation with a person of faith in a reasonable way in which there is lenience towards differences in beliefs.
A second case that should be well examined in pursuit of understanding the death penalty, its faults and benefits, is the case of the Kansas City Massacre. On the morning of June 17, 1933, the residents of Kansas City were in shocked to learn of the murder in their lovely state of Missouri. The massacre involved the attempt of Charles Arthur “Pretty Boy’ Floyd, Vernon
VIEW DOCUMENT

1141 words - 5 pages
counter the benefits or pleasures
that the criminal would receive from the illegal act. In addition, the
punishment must be administered swiftly so that potential criminals
will see a clear cause-and-effect relationship between the two. The
most convincing argument for the deterrent effect of the death penalty
comes from the commonsense belief that people fear death more than
life in prison. "Once in prison, virtually all convicted murderers
seek to avoid execution by appealing to reduce their sentence to 'life
in prison' (Bender)." For example, in the Washington Post, a witness
to a murder had been executed hours after testifying, so a second
witness
VIEW DOCUMENT

669 words - 3 pages
The death penalty is and has been a very much controversial issue among the American society. Much of the topic regarding capital punishment has been on a for or against situation ever since the history of sentencing criminals to death began. Some people see it alright to kill someone who took another person's life. Pretty much it was considered an act of revenge based on the laws regulating the country's legal system. On the other hand, some people see it as illegal and wrong.
The death penalty is recognized by those that oppose it as an inhumane manner in dealing with criminals. Moreover, some states in this country have felt that the need to have the death penalty is deemed
VIEW DOCUMENT

953 words - 4 pages
The Justice of the Death Penalty
Whenever the word "death penalty" comes up, extremists from both sides start yelling out their arguments. One side says deterrence, the other side says there's a potential of executing an innocent man; one says justice, retribution, and punishment; the other side says execution is murder. Personally I think it is time for Americans to take a stand use the justice system as it was intended, for the punishment of criminals.
A big point of argument for the people against the death penalty is the accidental execution of an innocent person.(Royco, 370) Before deciding, one must remember the lives that the death penalty saves. Repeat murderers are
VIEW DOCUMENT

1284 words - 5 pages
THE DEATH PENALTY"THE DEATH SENTENCE IS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE ACROSS OUR WORLD"the death penalty is a very common controversial socialissue across our world.every time a death penalty case arises, and time comesfor the convict, thousands of people across the countries support the punishment as well as protest the punishment."this issue does not have any proponents of particular group. people are very split on this subject, regardless of race, backgrounds, age, gender, and other variables that distinguish individuals". (prodeathpenalty.com)the Alabama supreme court set a may 1st , 2002 execution date for a Florida woman convicted in 1993 shooting an Opelika police officer, her name
VIEW DOCUMENT

2021 words - 8 pages
The death penalty is one of the nation’s most hotly debated topic. Most Americans are either heavily in favor of execution or heavily opposed to it. In America, there are multiple methods of execution, lethal injection, firing squad, hanging, electrocution, and the gas chamber. Imagine, being strapped to a chair in various areas; usually the chest, groin, arms, and legs. A metal skullcap attached to your head, and then you’re blind folded. What might be going through your head? Were you wrongly convicted, or did you deserve death? There are two sides to every issue. While some say the death penalty is a flawed punishment method because it is irreversible, and innocent people have
VIEW DOCUMENT

1358 words - 6 pages
Pros and Con of The Death Penalty
The sentence of the death penalty for most people is an unfair and unjust subject. It carries way too high of a stake. The question is what do with those on death row. Imagine what they think about in their final days? Do they hope to get overturned? Do they think about their family and friends’ loved ones? What crosses their minds? Do they wonder what’s going to happen here on earth when their gone? Well, not necessarily, I mean consider the fact is many people on death rows are mentally unstable or disabled or even deranged They enjoy the thrill of having the attention of the media or the press. I feel that cruel and unusual punishment is totally
VIEW DOCUMENT

1340 words - 5 pages
"Punishment," writes McTaggart, "is pain and to inflict pain on any person obviously needs justification." But if the need to justify punishment is obvious, the manner of doing so is not. In fact, there is a wide variety of opinion on the single issue of publicizing execution. For example, Even though Sister Helen Prejean, a spiritual advisor who worked with death row inmates wrote the deeply moving novel Dead Man Walking, her ideas to make a difference may be impractical wishes to others. In addition, Prejean finds the moral cost of death penalty too damaging to tolerate, and thus she believes those death row inmates who "have died a thousand times already" deserve to die and stop
VIEW DOCUMENT

1481 words - 6 pages
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals of valuable futures.
To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” in which he argues that killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument is as
VIEW DOCUMENT

426 words - 2 pages
Each person lives their own lives and are responsible for the consequences that follow each decision they chose to make. The government has made a law that taking one's life is illegal. Only slightly excuseable in the case of self defense. So when that law was made, there was no exceptions or loopholes. The law was NO TAKING THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BEING. So what right does the politicians or the judges or even the people of the state have to decide that a man is to be put to death?
I strongly believe in an eye for and eye but that does not mean u take my eye and i'll tell someone else to take yours. If in the eye of the judge and the jury, a murderer deserves to die for whatever crime he
VIEW DOCUMENT

1371 words - 6 pages
“When Michael Ryan was sentenced to death, We were sentenced to” (Kelle, a.n.d, par.2). Keeping him tied outside to a deck with no coat to freeze in the winter cold, disemboweling him with a shovel to shooting off each one of his fingers, James Thimm was tortured to death (Kelle,2009). We imagine that as each day went past the pain would weaken. But that wasn’t the case for Miriam Thimm Kelle and his family. Michael Ryan the killer of Jim, were sentenced to the death penalty but little did Miriam know he was also sentenced. For some 20 years Michael Ryan's execution was carried out through every appeal on and on. The pain that Kelle’s family inflicted was insufferable. As unfortunate as
VIEW DOCUMENT

920 words - 4 pages
The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment. I always
VIEW DOCUMENT

1744 words - 7 pages
punishment, which is both morally wrong and a violation of the right to life for its dead. Others defend their opposite views by citing the wave of abolition of other types of physical punishment, such as branding and whipping, and recommend that locking up should also replace the death penalty (Abbott). The death penalty should be in place, considering the numerous benefits that comes along with it. The death penalty is good for deterring crimes. The death penalty is also the only punishment that is equal to murder, and places an importance on the high value of human life by enacting the highest punishment for taking one. Opponents state that the death penalty is wrong morally, and fairly
VIEW DOCUMENT

1652 words - 7 pages
Helena Cooper, a reporter of New York Times, Osama Bin Laden had been killed inside Pakistan by an operation that was ordered by Obama. He has been killed, which means he had been sentenced to the death penalty. He will never harm people anymore because he was deterred by the death penalty. The death penalty stops the violent criminals because it makes them never kill again.
The death penalty also benefits serious criminals by freeing them from a life in prison. There would have been a long imprisonment waiting for those people if they were not sentenced to death. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, there are 32 states with the death penalty and 18 states without it. Some of
VIEW DOCUMENT

1472 words - 6 pages
other end, proponents see death, even a painful death, as the only just punishment for crimes that inflict unimaginable suffering on victims and their surviving loved ones. Even among those with less absolute positions there are vigorous arguments about the social, penological, and economic costs and benefits of capital punishment (p 1).In 1967, the United States entered into a 10-year moratorium in which no death penalty sentences were carried out. In 1972, Furman v. Georgia (408 U.S. 238), the U.S. Supreme Court voided many state death penalty laws, calling them "arbitrary and capricious". Thirty-five states made changes to address the unconstitutionality of unguided jury discretion. Some
VIEW DOCUMENT

1980 words - 8 pages
criminals and other potential murderers out there. In essence, it has saved many innocent lives that otherwise would have fallen prey to the evil schemes of murderers. Indeed, there is no course more worthy than saving innocent lives. This essay presents an argument in support of the death penalty by considering its numerous benefits as backed up by ample evidence from credible sources. In order to build the argument, the essay shall also consider some of the opinions of those who oppose the death penalty.
Death penalty is a good form of punishment considering that it prevents future murders by acting as a deterrent. Society has always employed different kinds of punishments in an effort to
VIEW DOCUMENT

1236 words - 5 pages
Life is the most precious good that a human being possesses. Therefore, it is not a coincidence that one of the first human rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the right to life. The third article states that a person has the right not to be killed by any other human being, and this is where the nations that apply the death penalty are failing (Source 1). The death penalty or capital punishment is a legal process in which a person is executed as a punishment for committing a crime. It is still used in over 50 nations worldwide.
Centuries before the Universal Declaration of Human Rights existed, important civilizations such as the Mesopotamian, Greek, and Roman
VIEW DOCUMENT

628 words - 3 pages
The Death PenaltyIs the death penalty just or unjust? It has been argued that capitol punishment is imposed merely to gratify a desire for revenge. Whether or not a punishment is legal depends upon whether or not it serves a valid goal or purpose of a policy. The death penalty is usually defended on two grounds; is useful and that is just . Is capitol punishment moral or immoral? Is the death penalty moral? Capitol punishment is imposed to spare future victims of murder by carrying out the threat of execution upon convicted murderers. The death penalty punishes them not for what they may or may not do in the future but what they have already done. It's unclear that the murderer has the same
VIEW DOCUMENT

1710 words - 7 pages
correctional facilities have become a home away from home to the criminals living in them. At one point in time, jail was somewhere a person feared to go, Martha Stewart is choosing to start her sentence early, no fear here. Don?t you think it?s sad that a majority of poor hard working Americans do not have quality health insurance, but criminals in correctional facilities do? They don?t require a job, it comes with full benefits. Prison, to some, is a refuge where they can escape from the need to be responsible and follow society?s rules. I believe that many serious crimes deserve a harsher punishment. The crime a person has to commit in order to receive the death penalty has dramatically
VIEW DOCUMENT

1799 words - 7 pages
Almost all nations in the world either have the death sentence or have had it at one time. It was used in most cases to punish those who broke the laws or standards that were expected of them. Since the death penalty wastes tax money, is inhumane, and is largely unnecessary it should be abolished in every state across the United States. The use of the death penalty puts the United States in the same category as countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia which are two of the world’s worst human rights violators (Friedman 34). Lauri Friedman quotes, “Executions simply inject more violence into an already hostile American society.”
The cost of the Death Penalty is highly expensive. A case to
VIEW DOCUMENT

1768 words - 7 pages
"The death penalty issue is obviously a divisive one. But whether one is for or against, you can not deny the basic illogic - if we know the system is flawed, if we know there are innocent people on Death Row, then until the system is reformed, should we not abandon the death penalty to protect those who are innocent?"
--Richard LaGravenese
In the United States the death penalty is used as a punishment for capital offenses. These specifically can vary from state to state, but commonly include first-degree murder, murder with special circumstances, rape with additional bodily harm, and the federal crime of treason. (Facts) The goal of the death penalty then, is to deter these crimes
VIEW DOCUMENT

1656 words - 7 pages
Steel bars slam shut, not knowing if today is going to be the last day on earth. Death may come by natural causes or by the hands of another human being. The death penalty is form of punishment to people, who have committed sadistic crimes such as murder. The death penalty is also one of the oldest punishments known to man as it was included in the Hammurabi code. Most inmates are put to death by lethal injection and sometimes, although not often the electric chair. The death penalty is a controversial topic in which some people believe that the death penalty serves as an example for criminals to think of the consequences of their actions. Other people believe that the death penalty does
VIEW DOCUMENT

1275 words - 5 pages
As of January 1, 2010, 3,261 people live on death row (“Death”). Fewer than 3,261 people live in my small town of Belle Plaine, so to me this number is outrageous. Inmates that wait on the death penalty jail create a problem for everyone in the country. If we would put these inmates through the death penalty quickly, we could take the problem away from the country. Why do we keep murderers and criminals on death row around? People argue the controversial topic of the death penalty very thoroughly, and address all sides. On one side people argue that we would save money and the death penalty sets an example for other criminals, while on the opposition people argue that life without
VIEW DOCUMENT

1092 words - 4 pages
Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners? Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that the death penalty doesn’t really keep crime from happening. Of the thirty one percent, many believe that executing offenders of the law only runs away from the issue at hand. Also, if society thinks about it, ending the penalty would cost less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the
VIEW DOCUMENT

785 words - 3 pages
[1]-Title, Author, etc.-The Penalty of Death -Written by H.L. Mencken, 1926.[2]-Thesis -The thesis of the essay is on page 395, and is the last sentence of paragraph 3. It states: "What I contend is that one of the prime objects of all judicial punishments is to afford the same grateful relief (a) to the immediate victims of the criminal punished, and (b) to the general body of moral and timorous men." -Means that in the authors point of view, one of the key points of punishing a criminal is to give some sense of relief to the victims, and even to the law-abiding public in general -This obviously implies that he is pro death penalty [3]-Main Arguments/Points -To start the essay off, the
VIEW DOCUMENT

1104 words - 5 pages
Abolish the Death Penalty
Death penalty or capital punishment is the practice of executing someone as punishment for a particular crime after an appropriate judicial process. It is used as a punishment for specific serious kind of murder, but in some countries for adultery, rape, treason, drugs, terrorism and other serious types of frauds. The argument of death penalty whether it is effective or not is a contentious issue. There are people who support death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished. Also, there are some people that support death penalty, but only in certain cases. According to the Abolitionists, death penalty is an act of violence nothing else
VIEW DOCUMENT

1003 words - 5 pages
Capital punishment (the death penalty) is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. There are different opinions of the death penalty. Some oppose it and some agree with it. The death penalty has been regarded as a deterrent for murder. In an article called ”Working for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, it reveals “Death Penalty Focus reports on November 20th, 2008, that many victims of crime have realized a life for a life is no way to ease their pain”. (Michell). Basically, Michell is saying that Death Penalty Focus revealed that the person committing the crime can be a sociopath and served time in a mental health facility. Although the
VIEW DOCUMENT

1300 words - 6 pages
The death penalty is a source of capital punishment that is still being used today in many places including the United States. The death penalty is when someone is killed for a crime they've committed. Many states still take part in the death penalty, only eighteen states don't have an enforced death penalty regulation. The death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment, those who have committed a crime should be punished and should pay for what they've done without having to be killed. The death penalty has been an issue in many trials and has been changed quite often. Primarily the supreme court suspended the death penalty in the United Stated from 1972 to 1976
VIEW DOCUMENT

607 words - 2 pages
The death penalty is a very common topic today. The Laws were established as far back as the Eighteenth century BC, which codified the death penalty for twenty-five different crimes. The death penalty was also part of the fourteenth, seventeenth, and fifth century BC's Roman laws of the twelve tablets. There are three thousand seven hundred and twenty six (3,726) inmates who have been sentenced to death row in the United States. One out of every one hundred inmates, who are executed, is later found innocent. The death penalty as one knows not only introduces to our society inhumanity and murder, but also is against biblical laws.In the Fifth century BC the death penalty sentence was carried
VIEW DOCUMENT

1651 words - 7 pages
. Would-be criminals would think twice before committing an offense punishable by death, and because of this, societies would gain a sense of "moral security." As we can see from previous civilizations such as the Babylonian and Roman Empires, death penalty is effective and much more efficient than spending millions of society's tax dollars to upkeep their prison stay. Killers who have showed themselves capable of savage brutality need to be prevented from repeating their crimes and act as a lesson to others. Capital punishment is the most effective way.Given the benefits of capital punishment, it is hard to imagine why anyone would be against it, but there are several arguments against the
VIEW DOCUMENT

984 words - 4 pages
punishments and use "incomplete or implausible models" (AmnestyUSA, 2009). In fact, the murder rate in states with the death penalty has remained consistently higher than the rate in non-death penalty states. The threat of future execution is unlikely to enter the minds of those acting under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol, those who are panicking while committing another crime (such as a robbery), those who are predisposed to fear or rage, or those who suffer from mental illness or mental retardation and do not fully understand the severity of their crime. In contrast, some may believe that "individuals make their decisions based on the net costs and benefits of each alternative&hellip
VIEW DOCUMENT

604 words - 2 pages
throughout time has been what was deemed worth giving the penalty. Recently though all countries in Western Europe have abolished the death penalty. Now to a lot of people, the death penalty is one of the things that people look down at us for.The death penalty is used in every state throughout the U.S. except in Wisconsin. However the death penalty is only used today in mostly extreme circumstances. Some of the ways people have been executed have changed but today people die a somewhat quick and painless death. The electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, firing squad, and hanging are all methods of execution that have been used and recorded back to 1976. The most popular form being lethal
VIEW DOCUMENT

522 words - 2 pages
that they will face this kind of punishment. He supports the death penalty and even if there are a few faults he agrees that the benefits will outweigh these miscarriages.In response, the capital punishment has many counter attacks due to fact that it is a very controversial issue. Other philosophers argue against the death penalty with the simple fact that is has many miscarriages and too many innocent lives have been taken due to this punishment. Also arguments like person sentenced to death suffers more than his victim, are brought up depicting that the punishment is just used to avenge or to offset their crime. Haag in fact counteracts this by saying that is just to 
VIEW DOCUMENT

735 words - 3 pages
Currently, in the United States of America, thirty two states out of fifty have laws that permit the use of the death penalty. Fifty nine countries throughout the world have capital punishment alotted within their legal system. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is reserved for murder and other most serious crimes. There are at least fourty one federal capital crimes classified in the United States, including genocide, espionage, and multiple forms of murder.
It is important to understand that as of 2011, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the thirty five state supporting capital punishment held 3,082 inmates on death row, which is 57 inmates fewer than the
VIEW DOCUMENT

1693 words - 7 pages
that the inmate is not guilty, and people who commit a crime should pay for the consequences while alive in a cell.
The death penalty gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. Families never fully recover from the loss of a loved one, but the death penalty can provide closure to these families. The murderer has suffered his family and friends of a loved one. There are many victims with a single murder and when the criminal gets caught and convicted, it is understood that the punishment will be severe. The prisoners family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death. Another example is that it shows that the death penalty gives closure to the victim’s
VIEW DOCUMENT

1405 words - 6 pages
The death penalty is mainly known by capital punishment. It is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The judicial degree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence. The actual process of killing someone is an execution. Capital punishment has in the past been practiced by most societies. Currently fifty eight nations actively practice it and ninety seven countries have abolished it. Capital punishment is a matter of active controversy in various countries and states. Positions can vary within single political ideology or cultural region. I am for the death penalty. With the death penalty it allows there to be equal
VIEW DOCUMENT

3803 words - 15 pages
and paroled criminals. These are the serious flaws in life sentences that abolitionists prefer to trivialize to nonexistence. There is no doubt whatsoever that keeping murderers alive is far, far more dangerous to innocents than putting them to death.One US Senate report stated this position this way:"All that can be expected of...[human authorities] is that they take every reasonable precaution against the danger of error... If errors are...made, this is the necessary price that must be paid within a society which is made up of human beings."Also, the death penalty isn't the only institution that contain risks in exchange for social benefits . We, in fact, mindlessly use far more dangerous
VIEW DOCUMENT

590 words - 2 pages
The Death Penalty has become a controversial issue in today's society and I view it as another flaw in our justice system. If the inmates our government sends to death row are hundred percent guilty of the crimes they committed, these crimes are heinous cruel crimes, and the execution is a swift cheap process then I view no problem with the death penalty. Our being humans eliminates the possibility of an absolute accurate and unbiased justice system and the penalty for such a small mistake should not be the end of an innocent life.The death penalty needs to be a blind judge. No defendant should be sentenced to death for anything more then the crime he committed. Unfortunately there are a
VIEW DOCUMENT

1881 words - 8 pages
Few issues have been as hotly argued and controversial as the death penalty, with its many conflicting moral, social and legal implications. Compelling arguments exist in favor of the final punishment, and equally strong arguments exist to end its practice. Furthermore, considering its conflicting history, on the grand scale of the whole world, and in just America, it is unlikely that this issue will be resolved any time soon. In the United States specifically, the issue has great significance to the bill of rights and the 8th amendment, which prevents cruel and unusual punishment. The death sentence, due to the intense debate on its morality and constitutionality, as well as the many
VIEW DOCUMENT