Berkeley: University of California Press, 1939. [huge amount of
ethnographic info.--in dense tables with notes, probably should be
turned into prose by someone. use in connection with Essene (1942).
very little linguistic data--informant did not speak Cahto]

University of California Press, 1942. [huge amount of
ethnographic info.--in dense tables with notes, probably should be
turned into prose by someone. use in connection with Driver (1939).
Includes tables attempting to reconcile differences between this list
and Driver's. Several pages of Cahto and Lassik (Lucy Bell) vocabulary,
plus miscellaneous words scattered throughout [FTr/PTr:G/M] ]

___. "[Unpublished Kato Folklore Material]," 1935. Bancroft Library,
University of California, Berkeley. [probably very useful--I
haven't been able to see this yet]

Fredrickson, David A. "Cultural Diversity in Early Central
California: A View from the North Coast Ranges." Journal of California
Anthropology, vol. 1, no. 1

(1973): 41-53.

Freeman, John F., comp. A Guide to Manuscripts Relating to the
American Indian in the Library of the American Philosophical Society.
Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 65. Philadelphia, Penn.:
American Philosophical Society, 1966.

Garrett, Gary. "The Destruction of the Indian in Mendocino County,
1856-1860." Ph.D. diss., Sacramento State College, Sacramento, Calif.,
1962.

Government Printing Office, 1907. [portion of one page, very
basic description, but includes bibliography of old sources w/ old
synonyms for "Cahto"]

___. "Kato Linguistic Miscellany (with Edward Sapir)," 1908. [is
this the few pages of Sapir's transcriptions?--probably so If so
[GTr/XTr:BR? (same dialect, if not BR)]]

___. "Kato Linguistic Data: Holograph," 1908. Bancroft Library,
University of California, Berkeley; CU 23.1 item 12.11. [I think
this is the collection of Rousselot kymograph apparatus tracings--could
be useful if there are many that didn't appear in "Elements of the Kato
Language"]

___. "The Kato Pomo not Pomo." American Anthropologist, n.s., vol.
5, no. 2 (1903): 375-376. [no linguistic data, just a very short
note saying that the "Kato Pomo" are, in fact, not Pomo but Athabaskans
speaking a language very similar to Wailaki--it just happened that many
of them at that time were fluent in Sherwood Pomo as well]

[Second best transcription (after Harrington's): almost
consistently catches tc vs. ch
distinction, catches ejectives more consistently than anyone except
Harrington, inconsistently represents gh as "gamma" or
"g", inconsistently represents g as "g" or "q"
(following Goddard), represents stress and vowel length. The
(apparently) precise representations of stress and vowel length have
the potential to document the existence of complex interactions between
vowel length, stress and the relative suffix -i
somewhat like those in Hupa; but, alas, the corpus is too small and not
quite consistent enough.]