Wake up commies!!!. Start writing and REMEMBER to follow the “Rules”….

(1) To the extent possible make America the target of criticism. Play down the existence of Taiwan.
(2) Do not directly confront [the idea of] democracy; rather, frame the argument in terms of “what kind of system can truly implement democracy.”
(3) To the extent possible, choose various examples in Western countries of violence and unreasonable circumstances to explain how democracy is not well-suited to capitalism.
(4) Use America’s and other countries’ interference in international affairs to explain how Western democracy is actually an invasion of other countries and [how the West] is forcibly pushing [on other countries] Western values.
(5) Use the bloody and tear-stained history of a [once] weak people [i.e., China] to stir up pro-Party and patriotic emotions.
(6) Increase the exposure that positive developments inside China receive; further accommodate the work of maintaining [social] stability.

1:33 pm October 15, 2013

Shanghai Douche wrote:

AND PLEASE THIS TIME.... more emphasis on point (5) Use the bloody and tear-stained history of a [once] weak people [i.e., China] to stir up pro-Party and patriotic emotions.

1:45 pm October 15, 2013

Shanghai Douche wrote:

...and add something like "hurt the feelings of the Chinese people"... it works always....

2:17 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

@Shanghai D

Is that a crib sheet for the Chinese posters on this site?

3:24 pm October 15, 2013

Shanghai Douche wrote:

Yes. Some one has to look after Chinese writers.

4:09 pm October 15, 2013

Shanghai Douche wrote:

"purity" of Marxism is most important struggle for People!

4:16 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

Disgusting greedy legalman.

4:35 pm October 15, 2013

From China wrote:

The whole Chinese nation is behind the Chinese government to defend with all means our utmost national interest and core values, with steely determination and unswerving will. The US has used force to achieve its national objectives countless times and now is encouraging other country to use legal means to swindle China's rights and interest. It's doomed to failure.

4:41 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

At the end of the day, it all comes to who has the biggest fist. Apparently, the Pinoys don't, and never will have one...

6:09 pm October 15, 2013

@Shanghai Douche wrote:

Of course America should be criticized. It is the worst killer in the world, it have the most corrupted leadership in the world, it is the most murder and crime infested place in the world, it has the largest unequal wealth distribution along the skin color line, it has liars as presidents and the people lie all the time. Finally it is the world largest hacker and internet snooper in the world.

Those cruel colonialists and their descendants couldn't possibly understand the torture, misery and humiliation that the Chinese received and felt. These colonialists are virus.

7:06 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

this is most funny statement you ever heard from american about fairness, justice and rule of law.

"the members of the Tribunal will place themselves in China’s position and try to identify counter-arguments China might have made, and then give us a chance to address these hypothetical counter-arguments "

wonder such rules apply in usa court too?

7:10 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

In more than 95% of international cases — litigation and arbitration before various international courts and tribunals — the states comply with the judgment, even if they are unhappy with it.
_________________________________________________________________________________
american is great at lying to world community.

state comply with it despite they are unhappy because they agree to bring the case to arbitration.

so far , there is no such case where one party absent from proceeding or disagree to settle in via arbitration.

lawyer need find a case to support his contention - for instance, commercial arbitration ?

7:12 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

maybe someone need to tell lawyer - unclos is not the mother of all rules in the sea.

unclos does no invalidate the historical rules which exist for centuries

law of sea does not just begin to exist when unlcos was passed.

law of sea already there even before white settler massacre native american..

7:23 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

The UNCLOS was signed without the retroactive clause therefore it has no jurisdiction over China's claim that preceded that law.

7:58 pm October 15, 2013

Is the bankrupt USA still shutdown ?? wrote:

Lol.

8:06 pm October 15, 2013

jake wrote:

Philippines has no more rights to the shoals than anybody else.Fishermen have been fishing there for
centuries before Philippines start arresting "foreign" fishermen .This came to a halt when China stepped
in and now it is the filipino fishermen who cannot fish there.
China's 9-dash ,though excessive, was made during ww2.If it had the naval might, the 9 dash would be
Chinese territory without much commotion today .Unfortunately, she didn't have the naval might to enforce this even though she occupied the main islands of the spratly earlier than other claimants.
There is no way She is going to relinquish her spratly claim just because the UNCLOS came into being much later.

8:22 pm October 15, 2013

ROFL wrote:

You make me laugh, you Chinese 50 Cent'ers. As if you know Law. ROFL! Your little Red Book is NOT the basis of International Law.

Signatories have responsibilities. If you wanted to keep your ancient claims then you go back to the stone age. By the way, Claims are NOT Rights, hence the need for Arbitral Tribunal. In case, you missed that in Law School.

8:31 pm October 15, 2013

@rofl wrote:

The US 50 centers which are among the 50 to 100 million food stamping beggars only know how to get drunk and make babies. How could they understand when it says that a signed agreement is not retroactive. Go and find your dinner at the dumpster.

8:35 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

The Philippines is such a pathetic country. Despite being a sizable island nation with a population of almost a 100 million, its naval warships are merely two 45-year-old decommissioned US coastguard cutters! If this is not the result of extreme incompetence and corruption, I don’t know what it is!

8:40 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

Any law in the world that doesn't have any retroactive clause automatically has no jurisdiction over matters that predated that law. Many uneducated trolls here clearly don't have the sophistication to understand the correct interpretation of the law.

8:53 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

Why do you call the anti China trolls, the 5 centers? They call the Chinese 50 center while they can eat to live because China is kind enough to lend money to these people. Therefore obviously they are cheaper than the Chinese and suited to be called the 5 center.

10:23 pm October 15, 2013

This space lacks a single Chinese commenter with logic and integrity wrote:

Same same every day. Nationalist trolling.

10:44 pm October 15, 2013

pug_ster wrote:

I love it when WSJ propaganda thinks that this arbitration will change anything. How can you have an arbitration with only 1 party is present? It is like one hand clapping. The UN shouldn't waste time doing this kind of petty stuff and instead go after American war criminals. Hell, the UN can easily prosecute every president post WWII with the exception of President Carter on war crimes but UN is a corrupt institution.

10:47 pm October 15, 2013

Ken wrote:

I'll suck your cock for 5 bucks

11:03 pm October 15, 2013

ROFL wrote:

@Anonymous
Funny how you say go to the dumpster. I am BBQ a steak in my backyard here in North America. LOL!
How about you make some toys for me to by from a dollar store ok?

So what if some nations are smaller and poorer than you at least they have manners. How about you go to Guam and try claiming some of that rock? You will see what's coming your way.

11:05 pm October 15, 2013

ROFL wrote:

@pug_Ster
Do you hear that sound? That's right! No one cares about your whining. LOL! Douche.

11:25 pm October 15, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

The Pinoy can be a good chambermaid and porter, but they have no chance against China.

11:37 pm October 15, 2013

@ROFL wrote:

Like I said, you must be among those 50 to 100 million American food stamping beggars. Judging from your level sophistication, you must be getting your dinner from the dumpster. Let me explain to you slow brain. The law is, any contract of an agreement holds only after being signed by the interested parties. It does not hold any validity retroactively unless specifically mentioned in a clause called the retroactive clause. You are a pompous beggar but stupid.

12:43 am October 16, 2013

press-flat wrote:

It should be mentioned that China has an Aircraft carrier...the Philippines does not.

12:48 am October 16, 2013

press-flat wrote:

WSJ...please take down 10:47am comment.

1:25 am October 16, 2013

OODA loop STAT wrote:

I'm interested in the other court case where Spain's highest courts have charged Hu Jintao for GENOCIDE of Tibetan people since he was in charge there before becoming dictator of China.

China is crying so loudly that it pales in comparison to Wen Jiabao being exposed by NYT on his family wealth of $2.7 billion dollars!

4:19 am October 16, 2013

@ooda wrote:

Since when is a media from the US could become the prosecutor and the judge for China. NYT couldn't even ever uncover a single fraud from the myriads which have been continuously happening in the US. And to believe that such incompetent media could uncover the corruption of a prime minister in an opaque China is an absolute stupidity. You Americans are getting dumb even at lying. Pathetic.

4:27 am October 16, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder what the comments would be if an American Indian(I mean aboriginal) takes United States to Chinese court. That would be a much more interesting scenario

4:36 am October 16, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

Spain and the other western countries are still thinking that they are the world's colonialists master. The Spanish judges may come to China and eat some mud.

6:55 am October 16, 2013

joker wrote:

what a joke, lawer comments his fight for justice, more reasonable for money I would think...they are the worst money sucker ever in this world.

8:40 am October 16, 2013

wilhelm pepplin with enlightenment wrote:

I really understand cinaese living in cina mainlan always so idiot but I wonder why cinaeses always r so arrogant and self-opinionated.

In short they are all real sad sacks aren't they!

8:50 am October 16, 2013

STEPHEN LAUDIG wrote:

I don't really believe the "fight for justice" argument. I'd like to hear how much he is being paid to fight for justice. This is hired gun land, nothing more, nothing less

9:24 am October 16, 2013

Little Brown Brothers grovels again wrote:

The Filipinos are getting closer to seeing their dream come true -- BACK TO STATEHOOD under Yankee overlords once again !! This is so pathetic. They've been screwed over so many times by Gi Joe and Uncle Sam, they're still asking for more.... When will they free themselves for such slavery!!

9:25 am October 16, 2013

Little Brown Brothers grovel again wrote:

I meant "..from such slavery"

9:29 am October 16, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

"Pivot to Asia" starts with a bang;
"Pivot to Asia" deploys the 3 stooges as proxies (Japan, vietnam, Philippines);
"Pivot to Asia" sinks on a reef;
"Pivot to Asia" frozen by Congressional shutdown ;
"Pivot to Asia" collapses with a whimper ultimately.

9:48 am October 16, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

@Little Brown Brothers grovels again

Yeah, no doubt the Pinoys just love to be screwed by the Yanks.

10:03 am October 16, 2013

aqua knight wrote:

while the philippines is relying on unclos and a third party tribunal to resolve the issue, china is asserting historical rights but has not released any official document or literature to prove its claims.

also, both china and the philippines suffered much from foreign occupation in the past wars. shouldn't they be allies?

11:12 am October 16, 2013

CQCQ wrote:

Depend who pay, just a hired gun...

He has particular experience representing and advising Sovereign States in land and maritime boundary disputes with neighboring States, including Nicaragua against Colombia in the International Court of Justice (2007-2012); Bangladesh against Myanmar before the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (2009-2012); Croatia against Slovenia (2011-present); and arbitrations under the Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for the Mauritius against the United Kingdom (2010-present); Bangladesh against India (2009-present) and Guyana against Suriname (2004-2007).

11:15 am October 16, 2013

@aqua knight wrote:

There is a Chinese saying "不怕神一樣的對手， 就怕豬一樣的隊友。" (i.e., What to fear are not the God-like opponents but the goose-like teammates).

So having the Philippines as an ally? Thanks, but no thanks.

9:40 pm October 16, 2013

Sam wrote:

Stop the neo Natz.

3:45 am October 17, 2013

Sam wrote:

On October 15, 2013,
From China wrote:
"The whole Chinese nation is behind the Chinese government to defend with
all means our utmost national interest and core values, with steely determination
and unswerving will. The US has used force to achieve its national objectives
countless times and now is encouraging other country to use legal means
to swindle China's rights and interest. It's doomed to failure."

Such an idea means China will uses force against the Phillippines. But how
do we know China will be victorious? To lose a legal case is quite different
from losing a war. If I were China I would prefer losing in the court room
to losing in the battle field.

4:17 am October 17, 2013

China sorry for signing UNCLOS yet? wrote:

The Phillippines are smart by taking this to tibunal in the Hague as China need not be available in order for the UNSC court to reach a conclusion.

One can't help but laugh at China who cannot provide a single map or document to prove their ancient claims in the SCS to the tribunal, and explains why China refuses to even show up in court!

Japan has already out-smarted the CCP when they signed a fisheries agreement with Taiwan, but left mainland China out in the cold! I laughed when Taiwan now says their coast guard will work along side the Japanese coast guard in keeping the mainland Chinese fishing pirates out of their mutual fishing grounds in the Senkakus!

Now the Philippines are showcasing that they too, can out-smart the Chinese by achieving UNCLOS ruling in tribunal. Everyone knows the Chinese don't honor any agreements like the DPRK, so the victory is seeing China further thow their cedibility down the drain when Philippines wins the tribunal by next year.

4:38 am October 17, 2013

elcondematador wrote:

China where were you when the US had base in the Philippines and the Seventh Fleet patrolling the West Philippine Sea? Nowhere. Just doing proxy wars. Confront the US directly and see where will it get you...sa kankongan! Don't be too confident in your billion people armed forces, They can be easily billion graves in a blink...

6:15 am October 17, 2013

huang li wrote:

Hmmm, We chinese dont know this stuff.

7:00 pm October 17, 2013

OODA loop STAT wrote:

I’ve just farted, rotten eggs, the stink is almost unbearable, think I may of soiled my pants again.

3:16 pm October 23, 2013

9.dashed.brain wrote:

to all you 50-cent trolls out there: If you have any arguments you wanna say, let's talk about it in court!

12:45 pm November 10, 2013

Anonymous wrote:

Thank you Atty. Reichler for taking our case. Foley Hoag made am admirable act when they decided to take this case.

4:59 pm March 19, 2014

Anonymous wrote:

fight for justice thats the man said it.. if china wont comply and use force.. its image and influence in the region will affected not only in the region but the entire world....

Add a Comment

Error message

Name

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the use of your real name.

About China Real Time Report

China Real Time Report is a vital resource for an expanding global community trying to keep up with a country changing minute by minute. The site offers quick insight and sharp analysis from the wide network of Dow Jones reporters across Greater China, including Dow Jones Newswires’ specialists and The Wall Street Journal’s award-winning team. It also draws on the insights of commentators close to the hot topic of the day in law, policy, economics and culture. Its editors can be reached at chinarealtime@wsj.com.