bluejester

To make my post some what relevant, I think that the turtle thing is the reason this isn't in the fog right now. It's getting a bit old, and this is (minus the harebunnies) is three turtle subs in a row for Ramyb. Even the fans get tired of the same thing.

endangeredomega

Maybe it's just me, but something about the angle of the bo staff, and the expression on the second turtle-head's face, give the impression that the mutant is doing something inappropriate to itself ...

Josephus

mindputtee wrote:Also, about the concerns of this getting rejected on the grounds of TMNT and video games, that's total crap, this design doesn't reference TMNT at all, yes it's a mutant turtle but that concept is not owned by TMNT. This is a completely independent idea, even if it does play on people's nostalgia for TMNT.

While I generally stay out of these things, I'd have to disagree about that.

1) It's called a mutant in the title.
2) It has ninja weaponry.
3) It has four heads.
ergo, TMNT.

One point of the previous comment was that OTHER designs were rejected for video games because the rejectorationers felt that they were about TMNJ. I don't believe that discussing this possible rejection case is out of line. Why would woot NOT reject this if they rejected the previous design that seems to meet the same 'video game' criteria as this one?

kbloomq1

jasneko wrote:"What's with the black spots? And take a look at his lunch!"

Both alluding to the controversy of the panda being a bear (some scientists debate that it is in the raccoon family rather than bear), as well as having the 'different' lunch at the cafeteria table... have you ever been that kid?

Molecular and genetic studies suggest that the giant panda is indeed a true bear (family Ursidae), and the "raccoon debate" has died down significantly in the past several years.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.