Difficult to give a helpful reply within the rules of this forum! The DVD is taught by Dr Paul Medhurst in his counter-intelligence course at the American Military University. The first publication to refer to them was the fall 2005 issue of the International Currency Review, edited by my late friend Christopher Storey FRSA.

My next topic will be the Comet. This beautiful aircraft was targeted by Germany. No fewer than 3 were brought down, with heavy loss of life, one by a drone and two by IEDs.

Yep. It was brought down by so many UAVs and IEDs that the only solution was to fit them with round windows, because round windows are UAV proof. It's true, thats why Boeings have rounder windows than Airbuses, the US takes terrorism far more seriously.

My next topic will be the Comet. This beautiful aircraft was targeted by Germany. No fewer than 3 were brought down, with heavy loss of life, one by a drone and two by IEDs.

Yep. It was brought down by so many UAVs and IEDs that the only solution was to fit them with round windows, because round windows are UAV proof. It's true, thats why Boeings have rounder windows than Airbuses, the US takes terrorism far more seriously.

There is of course no such thing as an alternative fact. There is however such a thing as an alternative view of the facts.

Let's take the square windows theory for the Comets. The windows weren't square, they had rounded corners, to reduce stress build-up, yet the media endlessly recycle the lie that the windows were square, even to the point of having inane commentary about square windows on TV documentaries with the actual, rounded-corner windows in the background!

None of the four fatal Comet 1 crashes can be shown to have involved a rupture at the windows. The Karachi CP Comet was mainly pilot error - over-rotation on take-off. The Calcutta Comet lost an elevator, initially blamed by the Air Ministry on a mid-air collision, a fact carefully suppressed in the intervening decades.

Yoke Peter allegedly commenced her break-up sequence at the ADF panel (not a window, please note - the panel was on the cabin roof!) and the wreckage of Yoke Yoke was never recovered. No one will search for it, as officialdom is afraid of what they'll find.

So, to recap: there is no evidence that any Comet 1 aircraft loss was attributed to a blown window. The RAE report was junk.

Why do you need to start another thread about the Comet? Seriously Spyhunter? The Comet accidents happened many years ago. Now you want to dredge it all up again because you know best? You really are starting to sound like a nincompoop (no offence meant). But the big question remains.... WHY?

It's never too late to solve a murder SoJo! The murder of Captain Alan Gibson DFC, his crew and passengers was a shocking crime, ditto the murders of the crew and passengers aboard Comet Yoke Yoke.

More than that, it was a political crime, aimed at the great De Havilland Company. The British civil aircraft industry never recovered from the blow and British prestige is still affected. Many of the dedicated men and women who designed and built this ground-breaking aircraft are still alive, and still smarting from the smears levelled against them by the dodgy Cohen Inquiry and RAE.

Only one of the Comet 1 hull losses - the Canadian Pacific plane at Karachi - was an accident. The other aircraft were brought down deliberately by the German DVD. Since they are still in business and since the asinine metal fatigue theory is so easily disproved revisiting the issue has relevance for the present day.

It is also important to give aircraft accident investigators, who still hold out the deeply flawed RAE inquiry as a model, a jolt. They are nowhere near as good as they think they are. Exposing the serious counter-intelligence and scientific failures of RAE and AAIB gives lessons for the future.

Never again must we have such a joke inquiry into the loss of a civilian airliner.

Staying with the Comets, another powerful argument in favour of sabotage is the fact that the initial autopsy reports on the Yoke Peter victims suggested a powerful explosion from below, where on my analysis the DVD's Hertzog placed the IED (aft lower cargo hold). It is noteworthy that the explosions on board Yoke Peter and Yoke Yoke each occurred over water thought at the time to be too deep for recovery (the Royal Navy proved the Germans wrong about that re Yoke Peter, using innovative recovery techniques including underwater TV), at about the same time and altitude (FL260) after take-off.

It is also noteworthy that only British Comets suffered 'metal fatigue'. In fact no fatigue cracks were found on any of the surviving aircraft in the Comet fleet and the only piece of wreckage showing evidence of fatigue was NOT recovered by the Royal Navy, but handed over by the Italians, close allies of course of Germany, at a time when Italy was about to formalise her client-state status with Germany by signing the Treaty of Rome.

I challenged RAeS some time ago re the part number of the part of the ADF panel the Italians handed over, and never got a denial that it was off a Comet 1A, i.e. a French Comet. BOAC Comets were the 1 model.

Why are you ignoring the blatantly obvious bombings of the Canadian Pacific and UAT Comet 1s? They carry all the signs of DVD tampering too! Maybe the UAT Comet was deliberately "written off" in a 3rd world country where proper investigations could never be performed, as the savage locals would be immediately be blamed for stealing the ADF panel you referred to as having been handled over by the Italians? And lets not forget that Germany and France were both close friends at the time. We must also remember that the UAT accident happened in Senegal, a former Vichy-French area (and at the time still a French colony). The place was fully of Vichy people who hated Britain for the attack on Dakar.

Are you taking a piss at Spyhunter? Not everything is the doing of the DVD you know

Not at all. I'm curious what Spyhunter thinks, or knows, happened to Jong-nam.

Also, I'd like to hear the Spyhunter version of EgyptAir 990 (sorry if it has been mentioned and I forgot). I know he thinks Captain Zaharie of MH370 is a hero but what does he think about Gameel Al-Batouti and what happened in the cockpit of EgyptAir 990?

Not quite sure what happened in Sweden, folks! You'd have to ask the White House. I am aware of course of incidents of serious sexual violence by asylum-seekers against women, but that has been going on for some time.

I have no firm opinion on Egyptair - it looks like suicide, but there are some curious features to it. Not investigated it in depth.

Looks like Jong-nam was whacked by the North Koreans. It's possible he had been recruited by the Chinese, or another country. DVD not involved - too amateurish for them!

Essendon crash looks interesting. It was an odd place to land, with respect, and an Aussie aviation contact reports one of the dead passengers was retired FBI. Single-engine failure, even before V2, does not explain the crash.

I think ALL were planted. Since the plane was shot down over the South China Sea they had to be.

Bear in mind that no bodies have been recovered, and there is no reliable chain of evidence linking this wreckage with MH370 - there is some evidence, but nothing Chinese intellgence could not fabricate.

This explains why no wreckage has been found in the SIO, where the plane is supposed to have flown. The SIO theory was a classic distraction strategy.

Well maybe, I don't know, this has something to do with the fact that both the SCS and the Indian Ocean are filled with fish, sharks and other animals/microorganisms that tend to eat/break down any bodies within a matter of days, two weeks at the most?

@Spyhunter I think I won our little bet, Geert Wilders isn't the largest party in the Netherlands and Geert Wilders isn't going to be in cabinet, nor will he be prime minister. So I will be waiting my price

I think ALL were planted. Since the plane was shot down over the South China Sea they had to be.

Bear in mind that no bodies have been recovered, and there is no reliable chain of evidence linking this wreckage with MH370 - there is some evidence, but nothing Chinese intellgence could not fabricate.

This explains why no wreckage has been found in the SIO, where the plane is supposed to have flown. The SIO theory was a classic distraction strategy.

As somebody previously involved with the joint task force I can assure others that what you suggest is total nonsense.

You think that all of the items from 9M-MRO found around the Indian Ocean were planted which leads you to make that false claim that "This explains why no wreckage has been found in the SIO". You dismiss the wreckage because it does not suit your agenda, that is all. Yet, you claim that "the plane was shot down over the South China Sea", a location thoroughly searched for weeks from the beginning that is yet to produce just one piece of 9M-MRO. Your logic is warped.

From my experience and from what I have observed with my own eyes, the Inmarsat data is 100% real and the debris found around the Indian Ocean so far, that have been confirmed as coming from 9M-MRO, are 100% real. Other items are still being verified but a lack of identifiers, such as serial numbers, on some parts is making that task very difficult. The only thing that has been planted lives within your imagination.

Only the ocean sonar search has been suspended at this stage, behind the scenes the investigation is still ongoing.

I think ALL were planted. Since the plane was shot down over the South China Sea they had to be.

Bear in mind that no bodies have been recovered, and there is no reliable chain of evidence linking this wreckage with MH370 - there is some evidence, but nothing Chinese intellgence could not fabricate.

This explains why no wreckage has been found in the SIO, where the plane is supposed to have flown. The SIO theory was a classic distraction strategy.

As somebody previously involved with the joint task force I can assure others that what you suggest is total nonsense.

You think that all of the items from 9M-MRO found around the Indian Ocean were planted which leads you to make that false claim that "This explains why no wreckage has been found in the SIO". You dismiss the wreckage because it does not suit your agenda, that is all. Yet, you claim that "the plane was shot down over the South China Sea", a location thoroughly searched for weeks from the beginning that is yet to produce just one piece of 9M-MRO. Your logic is warped.

From my experience and from what I have observed with my own eyes, the Inmarsat data is 100% real and the debris found around the Indian Ocean so far, that have been confirmed as coming from 9M-MRO, are 100% real. Other items are still being verified but a lack of identifiers, such as serial numbers, on some parts is making that task very difficult. The only thing that has been planted lives within your imagination.

Only the ocean sonar search has been suspended at this stage, behind the scenes the investigation is still ongoing.

Good day.

You're trying to add logic & fact to this thread when in fact it left this thread ages ago.

Somehow I feel I am entitled to a sip as well. I made the mistake of opening this thread yesterday - and it was like an accident: It's horrible, but you can't stop watching. So I digged through the pages, reducing my much needed sleep to the bare minimum to end up with...well nothing.

But I am with Tommy here - fuckin' great country we are with the Deutscher Verteidigungs Dienst (which is still gramatically wrong, even if better than "Deutsches").

I am still missing a little hint as to why all those things happened (re-establishment of Nazi-rule? fun? because they can?) but wow, the world is really totaaaaaaaaaally different than I thought it is. It's relieving that people like Spyhunter are going through all this to find the cold hard truth.

Enslave yourself to the divine disguised as salvationthat your bought with your sacrificeDeception justified for your holy designHigh on our platform spewing out your crimesfrom the altar of god

...forgot something: What are CIA and Donald the Trump thinking about you, Spyhunter, posting all this secrets here? Are they okay'ish with it? Or will you be reprimanded, with a whole lot of respect obviously, during the next lunch with 'em?

Enslave yourself to the divine disguised as salvationthat your bought with your sacrificeDeception justified for your holy designHigh on our platform spewing out your crimesfrom the altar of god

...forgot something: What are CIA and Donald the Trump thinking about you, Spyhunter, posting all this secrets here? Are they okay'ish with it? Or will you be reprimanded, with a whole lot of respect obviously, during the next lunch with 'em?

It is all academic by now, he probably was taken out by the DVD anyhow.

...forgot something: What are CIA and Donald the Trump thinking about you, Spyhunter, posting all this secrets here? Are they okay'ish with it? Or will you be reprimanded, with a whole lot of respect obviously, during the next lunch with 'em?

It is all academic by now, he probably was taken out by the DVD anyhow.

Nope, an israeli placed source in the upper circle of DVD told me, that apparently they have special plans with him. Some kind of a super secret project involving travel to the earth core to find a way to keep the polarity of the earth magnetic field as it is today. As we all know a change of polarity is (in cosmic dimensions) overdue.

Enslave yourself to the divine disguised as salvationthat your bought with your sacrificeDeception justified for your holy designHigh on our platform spewing out your crimesfrom the altar of god

I was really hoping spyhunter would tell us Stalin did not die but moved to Miami and is operating a popular cuban restaurant and is considering a run as a democrat for state senate in Florida.Also hoping he would answer the age old question did the U.S. really land astronauts on the moon or was it filmed in a deserted waterfront warehouse on the Thames in London. Oh well guess I will never know the truth.

Also hoping he would answer the age old question did the U.S. really land astronauts on the moon or was it filmed in a deserted waterfront warehouse on the Thames in London. Oh well guess I will never know the truth.

The moon landings did indeed take place, but what was covered up by the DVD was the fact that the rocket was entirely designed, built and flown by the British (no immigrants included). It's true, a reliable contact told me.