On May 18, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Martin Lechner wrote:
> We focus more on generic tracking (supporting any kind of tracking algorithms in a very generic way), relative positioning, 3D and infrastructure models, level of detail etc. rather than the (already pretty well GML-defined) location-based geometries. We also work on having a descriptive and a scripting part of the language, similar to how HTML and ECMAScript/JavaScript work together as seperate, yet cooperating specs.
How well does ARML 2.0 handle streaming delivery? This was always a troublesome limitation of KML because there are quite a number of applications that require a more streaming-oriented model.
--
J. Andrew Rogers
Twitter: @jandrewrogers