About Kangaskhan: That baby needs to be playable. I never understood why when a Kangaskhan hatches, it is an adult with it's own baby. Also, it's odd how you capture both the mother and child in the same ball.

_________________we all are actually monkey<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/monkeymaster.png"></center>s

Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:01 am

Blaziken Trainer

Bug Catcher

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:26 pmPosts: 19Location: Metor Falls

Yeah I agree that legendaries need evolutions. But on the other hand, some lagendaries look like they evolve from other legends. When I first saw Ho-oh, and it was legendary, and a fire/flying type, I actually thought that it was evolved from Moltres. I also thought that the other trio birds needed an evolution, too. And mew looks lke it evolves from Mewtwo.

Yeah I agree that legendaries need evolutions. But on the other hand, some lagendaries look like they evolve from other legends. When I first saw Ho-oh, and it was legendary, and a fire/flying type, I actually thought that it was evolved from Moltres. I also thought that the other trio birds needed an evolution, too. And mew looks lke it evolves from Mewtwo.

Ledgendaries don't need evolutions. That would make them more Uber then before, it just doesn't seem right.

_________________"In a world without walls or fences, what need it there for windows or gates?" - CEO of Appple

first of all - how is two words when it's a picture and even it's name is one word. and why does sneasel need an evolution - it's pretty strong anyway, being a dark type and being......... ummmmmmm...... strong.

ok, ok, i've changed my mind - it would be good if every pokemon had an evolution apart from, maybe, legendaries. But i don't think sneasel needs an evolution.

_________________This signature has violated the new signature rules. Please review these before re-creating your signature. Failure to comply will result in a loss of your signature privileges.

Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:22 am

Lance's Dragonair

Pokemon Trainer

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:33 pmPosts: 39Location: Dragon's Den

First of all, it was a joke.

Second, Sneasel could easily become a better Pokemon. It doesn't have great stats at the moment.

Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.

Sat Oct 30, 2004 9:53 pm

FreemanTheGreatest

Bug Catcher

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:44 pmPosts: 3

maybe legandaries can be babies with rubbish stats while we catch them, then evolve into a 00ber...

Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.

Wonder Guard on Sableye would be very nice. Though any non-evolution pokemon that has bad stats (I am too lazy to make a list though Aipom is one) needs to evolve.

_________________"In a world without walls or fences, what need it there for windows or gates?" - CEO of Appple

Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:48 pm

sN0wBaLL

Lite Four

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:03 amPosts: 3835Location: Singapore

, , , ,

It would be interesting if Pokemon like Ditto evolved. What would it have become, a greater mass of jelly? And maybe Corsola can evolve to a coral reef, porygon to lego, and octillery to sushi.

Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.

Wonder Guard on Sableye would be very nice. Though any non-evolution pokemon that has bad stats (I am too lazy to make a list though Aipom is one) needs to evolve.

problem is, the simple fact that its only weakness would be fighting after using Foresight would make the game unfair...

and no, Dunsparce and Gligar are completely different.

Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:31 pm

Lance's Dragonair

Pokemon Trainer

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:33 pmPosts: 39Location: Dragon's Den

Shuckle doesn't need and evolution. It's defense stats are already through the roof, there is no need for improvement. It's one of those token Pokemon that don't need evolutions (Ditto, Smeargle, Kecleon, Castform, Wobbuffet, and the legendaries) because they already serve their purpose.

I think should have a pre-evolution. Like a baby or something. It would be neat. Opinions?

_________________<i><b>Burn Baby Burn!</b></i><i>Blazizard</i>{typhlosion}{arcanine}{ho-oh}{moltres}{entei}{blaziken}<img src="http://www.vilhjalmur.com/butterfree/yacharizard.jpg" alt="Find out what pokémon you are at The Cave of Dragonflies!">

Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:51 pm

Blaziken Trainer

Bug Catcher

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:26 pmPosts: 19Location: Metor Falls

I think a Ditto evo'd be cool. hmmmmmmm... maybe call it uummmmmmm... Prango like "presto-chango".
Or maybe an E. stone evo like Pyrto (fire) or Freezto (ice) Florto (grass)

On a semi-related note, have you fought a Ditto with a legendary?
I'm staring down the barrel of another Aerticuno with the same moveset right now. hmm.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum