Revert the following changes:
src/sys/sys/quotactl.h 1.37
src/sys/compat/netbsd32/netbsd32.h 1.101
src/sys/compat/netbsd32/netbsd32_netbsd.c 1.188, 1.189
src/sys/kern/vfs_quotactl.c 1.39
src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c 1.483
src/sys/ufs/lfs/ulfs_quota.c 1.11
src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c 1.116
src/lib/libquota/quota_kernel.c 1.5
and do them correctly.
If you're going to change the name of something, you need to change
the name of *all* the things with the same name, not just a handful,
and you should change it to something similar so it still matches the
rest of the system rather than just picking an arbitrarily different
name.
Hi, Joerg.
To wit, rename the quotactl "delete" operation to "del", because
"delete" is a reserved word in C++ and for some reason Joerg wants to
run internal interfaces used only by C code through his C++ compiler.
Do not rename it to "remove" instead, because this doesn't match
libquota or the rest of the usage throughout the system; and rename
all the related identifiers, not just the ones that blew the mind of
Joerg's C++ compiler.
Because this is not a user-facing API (the only userland consumer
sys/quotactl.h is libquota) it is sort of ok to make arbitrary
source-incompatible changes; however, by the same token it's completely
unnecessary. If it *were* a user-facing API that someone might have a
semi-rational reason to want to run a C++ compiler on, it would be
incorrect to change it at this point.