Baltimore Sun Praises Maryland's New Gun Control … But Why?

Friday, December 13, 2013

Support NRA-ILA

Only when you have made the decision to support gun control groups for ideological reasons, even when gun control hasn't reduced crime and potentially reduces the ability of good people to defend themselves, can you write an editorial like the one that came out of the Baltimore Sun earlier this week.

"Thanks to new restrictions passed by the General Assembly and signed by Gov. Martin O'Malley this year, Maryland is now in the top tier of states when it comes to the strength of its gun laws." This ranking, of course, is determined by an objective, level-headed source--cough, cough--"a new report from the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Campaign."

Give us a break.

Maryland's high "score" is nothing new. Ever since gun control groups began "scoring" states on the severity of their gun control laws, they have always rated Maryland near the top of their scores. The Old Line State has long been praised by gun control groups for its waiting period on the purchase of handguns and "assault weapons" (the latter now banned under the recently-enacted law) and its law allowing carry permits to be denied to otherwise-qualified applicants for discretionary reasons.

Yet over the last 10 years, Maryland's annual murder rates have been 77 percent higher than the average of those of its neighboring states. A Policy Mic article reports, "Baltimore has consistently been one of America's deadliest cities."

No matter, according to the editorial. "There is good reason to believe that the new laws Maryland passed will help," the Sun said. That's because "Baltimore is an aberration compared to the rest of the state, fueled in part by the circumstances of the drug trade." And, as everyone knows, violent narcotics-trafficking gangs who get guns illegally are a problem tailor-made for Maryland's new law requiring handgun buyers to undergo expensive and lengthy training, just as it was tailor-made for its handgun waiting period.

Again, give us a break.

If other parts of the state have low crime rates, as compared to Baltimore and Maryland's D.C. suburbs, and if the disproportionate share of crime in those urban areas is due to the local drug trade, might the focus of crime control most productively center on the drug trade? How could anyone at a newspaper, other than a gun control absolutist who happens to work as a "journalist," think that gun control is the solution?

Yesterday, we reported that it was likely that sweeping gun control measures would be proposed in Pittsburgh. Today, Pittsburgh Mayor William Peduto held a press conference to propose a trio of anti-gun city ordinances that, if enacted, would constitute ...

Speaking in Montreal this month on the anniversary of the 1989 Ecole Polytechnique tragedy, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau confirmed his government’s plans to further restrict legal access to handguns and “assault weapons” and refused to rule ...

Michael Bloomberg, former NYC mayor and billionaire patron of the Nanny State, may be gearing up for the presidential race in 2020. He gave the idea of running as an independent candidate “serious consideration” in ...

Today, the California Department of Justice released the first in a series of regulatory proposals regarding the mandatory background check process when purchasing ammunition, which is scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2019.

As we’ve noted recently, much research purporting to demonstrate connections between access to guns or right-to-carry laws and increases in crime is seriously flawed. Often it's an attempt to curtail or eliminate Americans’ rights under the Second ...

David Hogg wants a federal tax on firearms and ammunition. He has repeatedly broached the idea, including multiple times on Twitter, and only sometimes suggests a use for the tax revenue. Hogg’s tweets on a ...

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.