> > The last time we went through this, it was left after Andrew had fixed it > > up when the cpusets version was merged in -mm without any disagreement > > from Peter who was cc'd and that version was acked both by myself and Paul > > Menage at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/14/402. Andrew dropped it and > > asked for a repost since there was some on-going scheduler work going on > > in linux-next that caused that version not to apply. No follow-up was > > ever offered.> > Hm, I thought I did that.>

There's no reply from you to Andrew's email unless it was private.

> > Why have we now gone in a completely different direction again?> > I already said that after Peter griped and suggested global, I thought> about it, and liked that better.

I think you're taking Peter's questions as a nack. He asked a question, I answered it. He didn't participate in the thread after October 20. Andrew's email to you asking for a new version is December 14 with these lines: