One if by Land, Two if by Sea: New Genetics Study Indicates Multiple Paleo-Indian Migration Routes

It seems like new discoveries about the peopling of the Americas are a dime a dozen these days. Without a doubt, the journey those first Americans took from the frozen wastelands of Asia down the Pacific coast into the Americas has been an active research subject for many decades. Archaeologists, linguists, and now geneticists have all analyzed the data in their respective fields, and while we have seen progress in figuring out the overall timing and migration routes across the Bering Strait during the height of the Ice Age, many questions remain unanswered. For example, there is still disagreement over whether there was a single wave of migrations into the New World around 18,000 years ago (a scenario generally favored by geneticists), or whether there were several separate migrations, each bringing across the Bering Strait its own distinct culture and languages (more popular among linguists).

Now, an international team of geneticists has added to the debate by trying things a bit differently. While the majority of genetic studies have focused on the four most common mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) types, or ‘haplogroups,’ among Native Americans, these authors switched things up a bit. In study published online Thursday by Current Biology, they focused instead on two of the most rare and localized mtDNA haplogroups in the New World: D4h3 and X2a.

Mitochondrial DNA is passed down from mother to child exclusively. So by comparing the mtDNA of different populations, geneticists can estimate where and when their female lines diverged from one another.

Haplogroup D4h3 is usually found along the Pacific coast of South America, while X2a has been found only in north-central North America. The authors sampled a total of 55 individuals who fell into either one of these two groups. They sequenced the entire mitochondrial genome for each, thereby adding to the considerable lack of knowledge on these haplogroups; this was the first time that anyone completely sequenced representatives of either D4h3 or X2a.

The analyses of haplogroups D4h3 and X2a revealed two distinct genetic histories. That difference suggests they may have come from separate regions of Asia and expanded in the New World in very different directions, even though they both may have arrived around the same time.

Specifically, the authors argue that that, even though it appears that both D4h3 and X2a individuals arrived in the New World at about the same time period – between 14,000 and 17,000 years ago – they took very different routes to get there. The authors argue that D4h3 individuals crossed from Asia to the Americas via a coastal route; the same path the ancestors of most people bearing the major haplogroups are believed to have taken. Then, they continued down the Pacific coast, settling in various places along the way.

However, X2a individuals seemed to have embarked on a different journey. Avoiding the coast entirely, this group of people traveled through a small inland corridor between two major North American ice sheets, about 15,000 years ago. Then, they continued into the heart of North America, settling in what is now central Canada, where their descendants still reside today.

The results presented by the authors provide – perhaps for the first time – clear evidence that at least two separate routes were used by the earliest Paleo-Indians as they left East Asia and entered the Americas. But, and maybe even more importantly, it shows that the migrants who took these routes may have come from two different source populations. We can only hope that future research on these two haplogroups can reveal where in East Asia they originated, and maybe even what made them cross the frozen landscape in the first place – by land and by sea.

I began my genetic journey at the beginning of this year. I’ve traced the Y DNA of three of my great great grandparents and of two mtdna lines of my great great grandmothers. All the lines except one were found in Europe.

The line of my direct mtdna, of my mother, grandmoter, and so on. First I’ve received the results that told me we belong to the haplogroup D. I want to know more about this, and to which specific group I belonged. The journey was complicated, I’ve compared my markers with all the databases available, and I found not 1 single match with my results.

None o the people with amerindian ancestry match my mtdna with more than 3 mutations. I begin then searching for closer investigation in my country Ecuador, when I’ve received information about the study with the Chachis in northwest country in the jungle of Esmeraldas.

This group belonging to the chibcha-paez branch fled from the inkas and after that from the spanish conquerors. Then finally with the support o the mtdna analysis I received the information that placed me with the D4h3 haplogroup.

In the Genoprahic Project or Family Tree DNA or many other bases, I wasn’t able to find a single person with a match for my haplogroup. I would like to share more information and also to find a scientist who can support me to investigate more about this rare finding,

Yours Truly

Santiago

Sam Harris

They tend to answer more of your questions on facebook in case you want more clear understanding or you can research it more in a research database or contact a geneticist who can answer your questions.

Additional Info.

Welcome to the 23andMe blog. We invite your comment, just please be respectful. Abusive comments may be moderated. For help or questions visit Customer Care. Our contributors are scientists, researchers and writers here at 23andMe. We’re interested in helping people explore their own DNA and what it can tell them about themselves. Learn more at our website or check out our store!