Auto Suggestions are available once you type at least 3 letters. Use up arrow (for mozilla firefox browser alt+up arrow) and down arrow (for mozilla firefox browser alt+down arrow) to review and enter to select.

Temporarily Out of Stock Online

ADVERTISEMENT

Product Details

Editorial Reviews

In these ironic essays, Lieberson casts a skeptical eye on fashion doyenne Diana Vreeland, photographer Diane Arbus and avant-garde opera composer Robert Wilson. Whether he is attending a Gestalt encounter group at Esalen, or laying bare the amoral core of est therapy, this contributing editor to the New York Review of Books (where most of these 19 pieces were originally published) brings a philosophical outlook to trends, fads and social issues. In discussing whether psychoanalysis is a science, and in a dialogue with romantic rationalist Karl Popper, the author, who teaches philosophy at Barnard, stresses the limits of science in defining reality. In a long article on global overpopulation, he argues that no governmental policy can be value-free. This miscellany includes lighter pieces on medieval cookery and Oscar Levant, along with scholarly ones on Isaiah Berlin, Paul Valery and anthropologist Clifford Geertz. (March)

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly

Half these essays comprise less than a third of the collection. Brief reviews and sketches, they are witty demolitions of people and practices (from Esalen to est, home decorators to devotees of medieval cookery) that share the intellectual and psychological rigidity Lieberson abhors. The remaining essays are long, scholarly, and engagingly readable. They too reflect his pluralistic faith in flexibility and explore more extensively his belief in choice, change, and incompleteness. His idols among philosophers are Isaiah Berlin and Sidney Morgenbesser, his adversaries Paul Valery and Karl Popper. In other areas his approach is tough-minded but compassionate; toward all positions he maintains a ``benevolent skepticism.'' Arthur Waldhorn, City Coll., CUNY