As with Medicine, Question Legal Advice

I had an awful experience with Rubin & Levavi. Their "defense" of me in Family Court consisted of admitting guilt and contrition for what wasn't a crime, but rather an unchallenged perception. I became responsible for what a school staff person privately said to a student (characterizing me & describing the nature of an otherwise ambiguous "incident"). It mattered what the student thought, yet not where the prejudicial information came from, the unmonitored staff-to-student communication violating school procedures and qualifying as psychological child abuse. The attorney work-product gets high marks for effusive deference to robe-wearing authority.

Lawyers should spot missing witness testimony (the number of actors different than the number of written statements). A friend of mine did (free), though too late. I like Nancy, and her daughter, but legally would only use them to establish an alibi.