Sunday, March 09, 2014

Koos Jansen reports another set of numbers indicating that the unprecedented demand for Gold from China continues well into 2014 and even gathering pace. We can see China's state-level military plan to accumulate Gold in action. Withdrawals from the Shanghai Gold Exchange Vaults account for 418 mt of Gold year to date. China alone is taking out annualised Gold world-wide production now!

"Koos Jansen research provides more confirmation of the state-level military plan implemented by China in order to accumulate Gold under the radar screen of the market observers. Explosive situation around Ukraine will ignite further catalyst for De-Dollarisation and China and Russia maybe already much better prepared for it than a lot of Western policy makers really understand. The Financial War could have been already won long time ago. We are due for a lot of surprises in the Gold and Currency markets coming out in the next few weeks."

Another week (24-02-2014/28-02-2014), another 49 mt of Chinese gold demand in the form of withdrawals from the Shanghai Gold Exchange vaults. Withdrawals year to date account for 418 mt. This brings February Chinese gold demand to 172 mt, down 30 % from an all-time 246 mt record in January. Let’s not talk about the COMEX.

In the West there is still confusion about Chinese gold demand. News outlets and banks are trying to figure out how in 2013 China net imported 1158 mt through Hong Kong, plus a few hundred metric tonnes through other ports, mined 428 mt domestically, while demand according to the World Gold Council was just 1066 tons. TheFinancial Times and the Telegraph couldn’t explain it. February 27 Citibank came out with a report named “Chinese Gold Demand: Unraveling the Case of the Missing Gold”.

In my opinion this analysis is actually a step in the right direction; Citi acknowledges Chinese supply and demand was 2200. In 2013 SGE withdrawals accounted for 2197 mt, these numbers are clearly related. The formula for the Chinese gold market is: total supply = mine + import + scrap = SGE withdrawals = total (wholesale) demand. Simply because of the structure of the Chinese gold market. However, this where Citi and I split up. I called Citi and I spoke directly with the analyst from the report. What surprised me was that this gentleman had never heard of SGE withdrawals! Hence our dispute.

First let’s get their numbers straight. They don’t disclose all the numbers on the supply side, but I zoomed in on the chart and calculated the amounts by measuring how many pixels each bar counted, compared it to the scale etc..

1) Export is not demand

In the chart above gross import is in fact net import. Very little of the gold exported from the mainland to Hong Kong was bullion withdrawn from the SGE vaults.

A very long and complicated story short: In the mainland there are two types of trade, general trade andprocessing trade. General trade can be considered as normal trade. If gold is imported in general trade this is required to be sold through the Shanghai Gold Exchange. Only 11 banks have general trade licenses from the PBOC, though for every shipment they need anew approval. It’s not likely the PBOC would approve gold export in general trade.

Processing trade is something else. In this trade form raw materials from overseas are imported, processed into products and then these products are exported again. This processing can only be done in Customs Specially Supervised Area’s, or CSSA’s. Processing trade doesn’t require a permit from the PBOC, as the gold that is imported will be exported after being processed. An example for a processing trade would be; gold is imported in Shenzhen, fabricated into jewelry and then exported to Hong Kong. The trade would show up in Hong Kong’s customs report.

Why am I telling you this? Because the gold that in 2013 was exported from the mainland to Hong Kong was all processing trade and did never go through the SGE. Concluding 1480 mt was net imported and that residual demand was much more than 640 tons in 2013. This chart I published on February 19 (the “Difference” is actual residual, WGC demand is more or less the same as CGA consumption demand):

2) Residual demand is not jewelry stockpiling

According to Citi this is what residual demand is:

…This includes stockpiling (by commercial banks,jewelers, etc.) as well as direct investment consumption…

I asked the analyst from Citi about residual demand, he said they don’t really know so they came up with this explanation. As we can see in the chart above residual has been 2000 mt in the last seven years. Was this mostly commercial banks and jewelers stockpiling? Of course not. I can understand some jewelers added some gold to their inventory when prices dropped significantly, for example in April 2013, but this stockpiling analyses is untenable. Citi continues:

In 2014… the result should be another large increase in Chinese imports and another large “gap” in supply and demand data.

Another large gap in supply and demand? Really? When I called the SGE in November 2013 they told me this gap(some call it residual, some net investment) is just individual account holders at the SGE withdrawing physical gold from the vaults. So residual demand is just direct investment and we shouldn’t treat it as a demand category that is insignificant.

Overview Shanghai Gold Exchange data 2014 week 9

- 49 metric tonnes withdrawn in week 9 (24-02-2014/28-02-2014)

- w/w

- 418 metric tonnes withdrawn year to date

My research indicates that SGE withdrawals equal total Chinese gold demand. For more information read this, this, this and this.

This is a screen shot from the weekly Chinese SGE trade report; the second number from the left (blue – 本周交割量) is weekly gold withdrawn from the vaults in Kg, the second number from the right (green – 累计交割量) is the total YTD.

This chart shows SGE gold premiums based on data from the SGE weekly reports (it’s the difference between the SGE gold price in yuan and the international gold price in yuan).

Below is a screen shot of the premium section of the SGE weekly report; the first column is the date, the third is the international gold price in yuan, the fourth is the SGE price in yuan, and the last is the difference.

About Me

Legal Disclaimer

Small Print

"Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns."

Bernard Madoff.

All opinions expressed on this Blog are personal opinions of its authors, they do not represent any official position of any companies they can be involved with now, have been involved in the past or will be involved in the future. We have chosen our anonymity as the way to protect our freedom of thinking.

There are NO Qualified Persons among the authors of this blog as it is defined by NI 43-101, we were NOT able to verify and check any provided information in the articles, news releases or on the links embedded on this blog; you must NOT rely in any sense on any of this information in order to make any resource or value calculation, or attribute any particular value or Price Target to any discussed securities.

We Do Not own any content in the third parties' articles, news releases, videos or on the links embedded on this blog; any opinions - including, but not limited to the resource estimations, valuations, target prices and particular recommendations on any securities expressed there - are subject to the disclosure provided by those third parties and are NOT verified, approved or endorsed by the authors of this blog in any way.

There is No intent of any copyright infringement in any way from the authors of this blog, we are relying on the Creative Commons in our work and in case if any owners of any content provided on this blog would like us NOT to use it, please indicate so in comments immediately.

Statements in articles on this blog other than purely historical information, historical estimates should not be relied upon, including statements relating to the companies' future plans and objectives or expected results, are forward-looking statements. News releases contain certain "Forward-Looking Statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions and are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties inherent in the companies' business, including risks inherent in resource exploration and development. As a result, actual results may vary materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.

This site does not constitute investment, legal, tax or other advice, nor is anything on this site a recommendation to invest in any security, or any other instrument, nor is this site to be relied upon when making investment or other decisions.

No Liability: No representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is made by this Blog, its associated companies or any other person as to the reliability, accuracy or completeness of this site. In no event will authors or any of their associated companies or any of their partners, directors or other employees be liable to any person for any direct, indirect, special or consequential losses or damages of any kind arising out of any use of this site or in reliance on it from time to time, including without limitation, any loss of profit, business interruption, loss of programs or data on your equipment or otherwise.

SRSrocco reports on further deterioration of the COMEX Gold inventories available for deliveries. You can guess who is taking now a...

Total Pageviews

Dedicated to all those brave men who have been fighting the bear market in 2000 and buying the dips without understanding that they were looking straight into the abyss. Do not trust your money in anybody, for you are the one who is going to be rich or poor, not those that are advising you: always do your DD. Disclosure: We are putting our money where our mouth is.