On Friday 02 January 2009 23:33:34 Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> Has this gone anywhere? Is the CVS repo safe yet?
Nothing has been done about this.
>
> a.
>
> > * Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [081229 09:50]:
> > > I had originally sent this mail in April, but it appears to have been
> > > blocked because the attachment was too large.
> > >
> > > While we are in the process of dealing with CVS-Git conversion, we
> > > should also apply this fixup to make the CVS repository more sane.
> > >
> > > Could someone with write access to the repository files apply this
> > > patch?
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, 1. April 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> > > > The problem appears to be that several tags around the time of
> > > > PostgreSQL 7.1 are broken or inconsistent.
> > >
> > > Here is a patch to bring the REL7_1 tag in line with the released
> > > tarball.
> > >
> > > The cvsps errors with the REL7_1_BETA* tags appear to be of a different
> > > nature. I haven't been able to fix those yet.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> > > To make changes to your subscription:
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers