Sunday, May 08, 2016

A Last Great Hope

What follows is an especially articulate
and unedited endorsement of Donald Trump,
who, following the primaries, has become the Republican Party’s de facto
nominee for President. Trump’s statements fly in the face of the political
establishment’s policy of stealth socialism and submitting America to “global”
priorities and agendas. Trump is an outsider not beholden to the socialist GOP,
and his statements and positions are already eviscerating the “Grand Old Party”
and sending its flock of status-quo hens and chickens fleeing hither and yon like
headless chickens in the Washington barnyard. We know, however, given the GOP’s
caliber, and also as the “Me, Too” party that takes its lead from the looting,
welfare state Democrats, that members of the GOP are conspiring to block Trump’s
nomination by fair means and foul. But,
a clearer and more accurate policy statement you won’t find in the news media
or from any other former or prospective candidate.Edward Cline

Why
Trump Deserves to Win the American Election

by Olivia PiersonApril 28, 2016

"My foreign policy
will always put the interests of the American people, and American security,
above all else. That will be the foundation of every decision that I will make.
America first will be the major and overriding theme of my
administration." Donald J Trump.

If Americans still care about the legacy they once wrought out of a raw but
magnificent continent, if they still give a damn about prosperity, security and
freedom, then Trump ought to be their man.

Watching from a far off country gives one a certain measure of objectivity when
viewing the American Presidential elections, but one thing is indisputable:
love him or hate him, Trump oozes the All-American spirit of advancement,
achievement and strong familial ties.

Since 2008 and the election of President Obama, the world has watched America
slide backwards. Grownup politics has been replaced by a revolting
imposter – Social Justice Warrior politics. I’ve often thought Obama
looks like a guy who cares more about just getting an approving hug from any
random stranger than he does about the success of his own country; a country
which in many respects has always played an impossibly important part in
helping to forge the future of the whole world. Obama has been a boy playing at
being a president, with dangerous results.

In direct contrast to the current president, Trump is a real man, and a real
achiever. He’s the stuff of gruff charm and hard-out competence, whose
appeal largely has its roots in the appeal of the classic Alpha male. He’s big,
bold, brash and boastful, at least he is when he’s locked in a competition –
and given that the competition to become a president is outrageously difficult,
that’s exactly the sort of spirit I want to see win.

But apart from these personality impressions, I feel a sense of relief when I
hear him state some of his policies. I didn’t realize how much I’d given
up on ever hearing a presidential hopeful say the things which are now going to
go down in history as Trumpisms.

1. A temporary ban on Islamic immigration into the United States.

This is way beyond important. It should have been an imperative straight after
the perpetrators of 9/11 wreaked their terrible murder on US citizens one clear
and beautiful morning. This was a profound act of war, but its soldiers were
hiding. It doesn’t matter if many Muslims might be innocent, so long as
they are the adherents of a bloody and backward superstition which is hostile
to the West, whose holy-book not only allows for, but actually calls for acts
of murder, they should be viewed with rational suspicion by anyone who claims
to care about having a developed society. The safety and security of American
citizens needs to be upheld first, second and last by their president. The
United States is not automatically responsible for being the benefactor of all
peoples who live in foreign lands – even if they do just want to go to
Disneyland.

Now that Trump has laid out his Foreign Policy, a policy which is basically a
return to "no foreign entanglements" that are not within the
self-interest of the United States (unless they are paid handsomely for the
privilege), Americans can rest assured that if he should become President
Trump, they will have the hardest of fighters, the toughest of negotiators and
a man of immense instinctive talent representing their foreign interests.

2. The building of The Wall (which Mexico is going to pay for).

As Carly Fiorina pointed out many times in the primary debates, the stemming of
illegal immigration into the States through the southern border has been talked
about and debated, with only half-ass measures being enacted for about 30
years. Action to actually stop this flow has been pitiful. We now
know that ISIS can and have sent operatives straight through that
border. Are people under the illusion that the Mexican government is
going to extend big efforts to put a stop to this? They don’t even stop their
own people (good and bad) from crossing. So now a nominee who has a
spectacular history of building huge, complicated projects is stating that he’s
going to build a wall across this rogue border. Amen! The safety
and security of American citizens needs to be upheld first, second and last by
their president. The United States is not automatically responsible for being
the benefactor of all peoples who live in foreign lands – even if they do just
want to go to Disneyland.

NATO’s stated purpose is this (taken from the official NATO website): the Alliance’s creation was part of
a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism,
forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong
North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political
integration.

Not only has Soviet expansionism into Ukraine and Crimea occurred without any
backlash from NATO, the whole world has watched Europe staunchly uphold its
weak-spirited commitment to fashionable cradle-to-grave socialism and unlimited
“tolerance.” In so doing, their commitment to multiculturalism has been totally
paramount. They have allowed unprecedented Islamic immigration into its
respective countries, (some more than others) culminating recently with the
Islamic Immigration Crisis; welfare dependent Muslims which Germany is forcing
all other countries in the EU to accept, whether they want them or not.
EU hopeful, Turkey, is negotiating this flood of people, who are most assuredly
not just coming from war-torn Syria! Deeply hostile to Russia, who he
accuses of intensifying the conflict and resultant refugees into his land (an
accusation I have no doubt is true), Erdogan threatens to further flood Europe
with many more millions of Muslim refugees. Read here about the next coming Immigration Crisis.

Turkey is a deeply Islamic nation which refuses to make war on ISIS but would
happily bomb the Kurds to oblivion. They are no longer the Turks of Kemal
Ataturk’s liberal imperatives. President Erdogan is the devout Muslim who
states that,“there is
no such thing as moderate or immoderate Islam: Islam is Islam, and that’s it!” (And
here is the West trying to sort Islam out into nice, neat, palatable categories
– that which is lethal, that which is peaceful, that which is in between.) We
should take Erdogan at his word – he knows a thing or two about that of which
he speaks. Peaceful, violent, latent, nominal or radical, Islam is all
one ideology. The differing sects (among them Shia & Sunni are just
the narcissism of small difference – similar to a Methodist arguing with a
Jehovah’s Witness, except neither the Methodist nor the JW will shed each
other’s blood over their differences). Those who kill in Islam’s name are
the ones who take their religion literally. They are the ones whom their
prophet would call “Good Muslims.”

A return to Nationalism and a breaking away from the EU may just be the only
way for these small countries to protect their cultures from being swamped and
Islamicized (under orders from multicultural-obsessed Brussels) – yet one of
NATO’s stated reasons for existence is to forbid Nationalist militarism.
Can you see a poisonous dilemma brewing here which America will be pulled into?
Trump can; hence his wariness on NATO and his bold statement to rethink it
all. It will take a mighty heart and diplomatic brain to sort through the
mess that is NATO, especially with Russia fanning the flames with its dangerous
bedfellows ie: Iran and Syria. The safety and security of American citizens needs
to be upheld first, second and last by their president. The United States
is not automatically responsible for being the benefactor of all peoples who
live in foreign lands – even if they do not want to go to Disneyland.

4. Enough with the PC Feminazi Nonsense! (Okay, not technically a policy)

When Megyn Kelly, in the first Fox-hosted Primary debate, asked the awful
question of Trump...

“You’ve
called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals... For
the record, it was way beyond Rosie O’Donnell... Your Twitter account has
several disparaging comments about women’s looks. You once told a contestant on
the Celebrity Apprentice it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees.
Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as
president? And how do you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton – that you are
part of the war on women?”

...it caused a furore which went on for months and months, and to which Donald
Trump remained admirably unapologetic. He knew he was being hit hard by
the Humourless-Harriet; politically correct feminist nonsense which has
emasculated men for several generations now. Frankly, Kelly was dealing
with the wrong type of man, and has suffered Trump’s contempt ever since; a thing
which has hurt her as the top darling of the Fox News Channel in a contentious
election, more than it has hurt Trump. She may as well have asked him,
“When did you stop raping your wife?” Trump was rightly galled that
this was considered to be "good moderation" from the nation's best
journalists.

This is where even Trump’s foibles are All-American in their essence. He
is a lover of beautiful women, of which Kelly is one, but if women try this
emasculation shit out on the likes of him, especially drawing on examples of
his alleged behaviour from his life as a non-political businessman, they’re
toast. He subsequently refused to be interviewed by her, he verbally
hammered her in public and he even declined to attend a debate which she was to
moderate. The ongoing nature of the feud was devastating to Kelly, so
much so that she recently said she was thinking about not renewing her contract with Fox because it had been hard,
not only on her, but also on her boss Roger Ailes.

It is so typical of the feminist mindset to want to play hardball with the men,
then run and cry to other men to take a stand to defend you. Kelly made
the comment that she was disappointed her colleague, Bill O’Reilly, didn’t make
more of an effort to defend her. Why would he? She had been warned
by her co-moderators Brett Baier and Chris Wallace, when they were running over
the questions before the fatal debate, that if she persisted in that kind of
questioning, there would be a lot of pushback (their male instincts were right
on cue). She insisted on having her way. Well, she didn’t just get
pushback, she managed to alienate a potential future president from her network
(which since seems to have resolved itself, no thanks to Megyn's own charms).

Kelly then invited the disgusting, sneering, morbidly obese, even uglier than
Rosie O’Donnell, Marxist lowlife, Michael Moore, on to her show to bottom -feed
with her about Trump’s decision to skip the next debate. Michael f**king
Moore!! A man who is militantly hostile to Western values and everything
America has traditionally stood for. They giggled and indulged in words
of admiration with each other - enough to make a grown-girl hurl.
Suddenly Trump’s insults about Megyn’s being a “bimbo” and “overrated” started
to make an awful amount of sense.

It has now come to light that in order to calm this feud, Kelly has reached out
to Trump personally and gone to Trump Tower for a meeting. The result is
an upcoming one-on-one interview with Trump on Fox, scheduled for May 17th. We’ll see how that works out, but
I’m betting Grandma’s creamiest pearls that Kelly will conduct herself with a
renewed sense of respect, and for that Trump will reward her with his time and
attention.

Trump won by not fawning over an uppity little femme with a fashionably
gratuitous absorption in resentment of the opposite sex (the feminist
agenda). If this is going to be typical of what is in store for Hillary
should he win the nomination, I can’t wait. Especially considering that﻿ hiding in Hillary’s filthy feminist closet are
toe-curling stories about her own personal war on the women who allege that they were
sexually assaulted by her own husban﻿d, and then systematically besmirched and threatened by
Hillary in the Clintons’ long ascent to attain the Whitehouse. If she
thinks Trump is going to go easy on her because she’s choosing to build her
campaign around playing the “woman” card, then she is in for the ride of her
life. One I believe she will lose, because some part of me still actually
believes that while scum often does rise to the top, it can be blown away by
the vim of a powerful challenger with right on his side. I hope America
proves me right.

BIG EDIT:
I'm just going to add right here that I have noticed many, many Right-leaning
people and above all, Libertarians, suffer from a massive snob-factor in
holding on for dear life to their Trump Derangement Syndrome. People who
consider themselves "intellectuals" take issue with his apparent lack
of smarty-man clever talk about The Constitution and Individual Rights,
forgetting that the human quality of AUTHENTICTY trumps, and should trump
cleverdickness on any day of the week in human affairs. People of aesthetic
sensibility take issue with his Liberace hair do, his Nouveau Rokoko palatial,
gold-drenched residence and white piano.

People who only care about the Free Market forget
that they have never lived in one, but somehow Trump is this radical, unusual
newcomer who is going to rob them of it (forgetting America does business
everyday with countries who do not observe anything close to a free market
standard). There are also those who take issue with Trump's wanting to ban
Islamic immigration, totally dropping context of the fact that America has been
in a war since 9.11 with Islam - that Islam has declared and America has
pretended to be oblivious to. I am so disgusted with these people for
pretending to have such "great judgment" yet are not able to see their
own shocking propensity for context dropping, despite their self-proclaimed
intellectual prowess.

They, in their various critiques, get to feel superior to Trump in
some f**ked up way - and that is the only emotion which carries them along in
their criticism and Derangement Syndrome. I hope they have the good grace to
let me know when they have created a family fortune of 10 billion plus, have
the heart, guts and competence to want to save their country from becoming a
"once was" civilization. I hope they let me know when they have 2
ex-wives as good friends, along with five high-functioning kids who absolutely
adore them - and, more importantly, want to learn from them. I won't hold my
breath.