Civil service pay caps risk poaching of digital talent, event hears

Written by Rebecca Hill on 1 November 2016 in News

News

Top digital officials tell the Institute for Government about the challenges government faces in recruiting and retaining specialists

The government needs to address public sector salaries, the 1% cap on pay rises and the leadership qualities it looks for if it is to attract and retain the best digital talent, digital experts have said.

According to the IfG, one of these is the difficulty departments face in recruiting the best digital talent, with problems including competition with the private sector and departments “poaching” other departments’ digital specialists.

Responding to a question from CSW's sister site PublicTechnology about whether this poaching was an issue, Oliver Morley, the chief executive of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), said he was “not convinced it was a massive problem”, and said such moves should be expected because of the ongoing pay cap on civil servants’ salaries.

“A 1%-a-year pay rise for six years is going to create an environment where poaching takes place" – DVLA chief executive Oliver Morley

“A 1%-a-year pay rise for six years is going to create an environment where poaching takes place, because the only way you can move people up the scale is by promoting them,” he said.

Although he acknowledged that there was clearly compensation that comes with working in the public sector, the DVLA chief said that even these could not compete in the long-term, and said it was “not tenable” for civil servants’ pay to continue “bump around in the bottom quartile”.

"Frustrated by the pace in Whitehall"

Meanwhile, Alex Holmes, chief operating officer of the Government Digital Service, said he believed it was important for the centre to play a role in addressing recruitment and retention problems.

GDS is, he said, working with departments to try and stop people having to move “from one half of the floor to the other” because one of them has a much higher pay scale than the other.

He added that the more work GDS did in looking at differences across the civil service, the more silos it exposed. “It’s all about blending these silos,” he said.

For fellow panel member Charlotte Jee, editor of trade title Techworld, the bigger problem was less the pay and more the working environment for digital specialists.

“Although pay has something to do with it, it’s hardly surprising government is struggling because even the most interesting start-ups in Shoreditch struggle,” Jee said.

“I think it’s more about working environment: they can get frustrated by the pace in Whitehall and some of the less useful behaviours they see from some people,” she added. “They need to feel they’re being supported in what they’re trying to deliver.”

The idea of encouraging a better working environment – rather than relying on pay alone – to bring in the best people was also picked up on by Kit Collingwood-Richardson, deputy director of Universal Credit at Department for Work and Pensions.

For instance, she stressed the importance of bringing in the right people at every grade in the civil service, as well as recruiting for different leadership qualities, such as humility and the ability to look more widely than themselves.

Collingwood-Richardson argued that if government recruited and rewarded people with those attributes by allowing them to rise up the ranks, “they won’t leave for better paid jobs elsewhere because government will be an exciting place to work”.

About the author

Rebecca Hill is the online editor of PublicTechnology, where a version of this story first appeared

Add new comment

Engineer in the MOD (not verified)

Pliney the Elder (not verified)

Submitted on 1 November, 2016 - 15:59

I have some questions on this article -
Does anyone have ACTUAL figures on the differences in pay between the public and private sectors for different jobs (e.g. finance, digital, scientific, engineering)?
What are the REAL FIGURES for skills shortage issues that get mentioned so often?
Mr Morley said about the pay that he was “not convinced it was a massive problem”. If that is the case then why does the Have Your Say Survey clearly state that less than a quarter of Civil Servants were happy with the pay?
This statement also seems to contradict the following - “not tenable” for civil servants’ pay to continue “bump around in the bottom quartile”. Please clarify the situation, is pay an issue or not? Obviously with less than 25% being happy – I’d suggest it is.
Mr Holmes, you said that the Centre has to play a part in decisions about pay – how long will that take and how will this limit the ability of organisations, such as DE&S, to act with freedom?
Mr Collingwood-Richardson you said that “if government recruited and rewarded people with those attributes by allowing them to rise up the ranks, “they won’t leave for better paid jobs elsewhere”. Not everyone wants to "rise up the ranks" - how will these people be rewarded?
Without proper answers about the differences in pay and conditions and answers to the follow up questions, I am struggling to understand how you will be able to resolve any of the issues.

Join us at BAMEiL and engage with key leaders who are shaping the Civil Service diversity & inclusion agenda, learn valuable strategies & tips on how to further your career, overcome barriers and network with peers.

This unique experience will explore how business and data can come together with the latest IBM cognitive and cloud technologies to transform your role, your business, and your market to exploit your disruptive potential.