It is very gratifying to see adjustments of temperature data from surface stations getting some attention again. You could say I started blogging due to that very issue. One of my first posts back in November 2009 was Climate Fast Food (“processed data”). The comparison between the unadjusted and adjusted data for certain stations was shocking:

“If climate change is weather records homogenised, I’d rather have the raw data, as I’m finding the processed kind rather hard to digest.”

One of my thoughts, echoed in a post over at wuwt, has been that at some point the potential for downward adjustments of the past is used up. At the same time, upward adjustments of the present become more and more obvious for what they are and if they are stopped then the upward trend pauses or, shock horror, may even turn downward. The warmists have been praying for years for an indisputable warming period so that they can recover some plausibility, but for the time being Gaia is just laughing at them.

Climate change and a small rising of the global temperature, it is obvious today when we see that the icebergs at the poles are melting and many animals like the polar bear struggle to survive in the warmer conditions which limits its hunting territory.
If others are not so interested in stopping or at least reducing the CO2 emissions in our world, we, as individuals can do our job and lower our carbon footprint at least at home.http://www.alternative-energies.net/a-few-solutions-to-fight-climate-change-in-2015/

Back then the CO2 concentration was four times what it is today as rising temperatures make CO2 less soluble in water. Temperatures and CO2 concentrations were much higher than today. Was this a disaster for living creatures? Absolutely not! That is when mammals achieved the dominance they still enjoy.

Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
One of the many reasons for genuinely doubting (not denying), warmist theories, claims and actions.
In accountancy, this is called “cooking the books” or creative accounting!