The fake michael kors watches look like toys. Nothing like the real things. The colours on the fakes make them look like they're made of plastic.

So the fake ones are uber tatt whilst the real deal is just tasteless tat? Pass, overpriced poor watch.

Tasteless tat would be your opinion. Each to their own.

The fake ones are rubbish and thats a fact.

My daughter wanted one of these and I went into
Big name jewlers and they told me, don't waste your money.
It's Infact what the other poster said "tat"
The rose gold staining comes off very quickly
And you have to pay to have it re painted.
It felt like cheap tin material ( no weight to it )
And they arnt reliable , you are only paying for the name.
I would of voted this cold even if it was £60

The fake michael kors watches look like toys. Nothing like the real things. The colours on the fakes make them look like they're made of plastic.

So the fake ones are uber tatt whilst the real deal is just tasteless tat? Pass, overpriced poor watch.

Tasteless tat would be your opinion. Each to their own.

The fake ones are rubbish and thats a fact.

My daughter wanted one of these and I went into
Big name jewlers and they told me, don't waste your money.
It's Infact what the other poster said "tat"
The rose gold staining comes off very quickly
And you have to pay to have it re painted.
It felt like cheap tin material ( no weight to it )
And they arnt reliable , you are only paying for the name.
I would of voted this cold even if it was £60

Wife has had one for a year, still as good as the first day she put it on also if it was any heavie the wife wouldnt wear it.

People dont buy a fashion watch for it to be a perfectly accurate time piece they wear it to look nice. I own a few watches and as far as build qaulity and accuracy the MK range seem preety good.

Fossil make a huge range of fashion watches I have a Diesel watch, it must be about 10 years old and still going strong.

All these watches are being manufactured in China in Fossil's watch plant - alongside with Adidas, Emporio Armani, Marc by Marc Jacobs, Burberry, DKNY, Diesel and Armani Exchange.It's an overpriced, Chinese watch with a Japanese movement, worth about £25.

But must admit that I got one for my wife as they look nice. Still, overpriced..

The fake michael kors watches look like toys. Nothing like the real things. The colours on the fakes make them look like they're made of plastic.

So the fake ones are uber tatt whilst the real deal is just tasteless tat? Pass, overpriced poor watch.

Tasteless tat would be your opinion. Each to their own.

The fake ones are rubbish and thats a fact.

My daughter wanted one of these and I went into
Big name jewlers and they told me, don't waste your money.
It's Infact what the other poster said "tat"
The rose gold staining comes off very quickly
And you have to pay to have it re painted.
It felt like cheap tin material ( no weight to it )
And they arnt reliable , you are only paying for the name.
I would of voted this cold even if it was £60

Wife has had one for a year, still as good as the first day she put it on also if it was any heavie the wife wouldnt wear it.

People dont buy a fashion watch for it to be a perfectly accurate time piece they wear it to look nice. I own a few watches and as far as build qaulity and accuracy the MK range seem preety good.

Fossil make a huge range of fashion watches I have a Diesel watch, it must be about 10 years old and still going strong.

For the quality and parts used to manufacture these watches,Its not £250 worth.
The guy slaps his name on a fossil watch and then thinks its a £250 price tag...... No !
Even at £125 its way over priced for quality of materials used to make this watch.

I agree that this isn't really a high quality watch most 'fashion' branded watches are just a low quality watch made to look like a high quality watch for maximum profit. The movement is typically the same as the cheapest watches and I think in that way they are like perfume, cosmetics, etc often there's little substance to back up the price. It's not just my own experience either I used to know somebody that sold and repaired watches.

The fake michael kors watches look like toys. Nothing like the real things. The colours on the fakes make them look like they're made of plastic.

So the fake ones are uber tatt whilst the real deal is just tasteless tat? Pass, overpriced poor watch.

Tasteless tat would be your opinion. Each to their own.

The fake ones are rubbish and thats a fact.

My daughter wanted one of these and I went into
Big name jewlers and they told me, don't waste your money.
It's Infact what the other poster said "tat"
The rose gold staining comes off very quickly
And you have to pay to have it re painted.
It felt like cheap tin material ( no weight to it )
And they arnt reliable , you are only paying for the name.
I would of voted this cold even if it was £60

Wife has had one for a year, still as good as the first day she put it on also if it was any heavie the wife wouldnt wear it.

People dont buy a fashion watch for it to be a perfectly accurate time piece they wear it to look nice. I own a few watches and as far as build qaulity and accuracy the MK range seem preety good.

Fossil make a huge range of fashion watches I have a Diesel watch, it must be about 10 years old and still going strong.

For the quality and parts used to manufacture these watches,Its not £250 worth.
The guy slaps his name on a fossil watch and then thinks its a £250 price tag...... No !
Even at £125 its way over priced for quality of materials used to make this watch.

I'm not saying its not but we both know that's not how the world works. Its supply and demand, people want them and they are able and willing to pay for a product. Fragrance, labelled clothes (even the like of next and other high street brands), sports goods, video games the list is endless all are sold for way over the "actual price", I see nothing wrong with it. If something likes and wants something they will buy it.