Whoever tried to find human origins, even if he found them, it could not have become a generally accepted opinion or theory. Creationism, as an idea, is prior to the evolution theory. Evolution theory, as scientifically proven, is opposite of creationism- it rebuts the main characteristic of creationism about God as Creator of all things. Although science is always objective and includes standards in every scientific research or demonstration of the scientific validity, lots of people still reject scientific knowledge, while believing in validity of creationism. Does the fact that existence of God is not scientifically verifiable mean that God does not exist? Or it means that science just isn't able to find some evidence about it? Despite scientific progress, does science really give us the right information? Is there a guarantee that some radically opposing view will not be proven to be true, according to T. Kuhn, which could replace theories that are accepted today? In this thesis you will find many authors’ opinions about the problem. It also addresses the issue- is creationism actually a political entity which seeks to combat secularization of modern society and the principal objective of cultural reconstruction, and it also addresses the issue between evolution theory and creationism in educational system. Furthermore, the thesis contains possible answers to the question- do creationists really believe in what they impose, or do they just want to „fight against“ evolution theory through comparing unsuccessfully implemented „creation science“ and „intelligent design theory“. Many authors claim that creationism as an idea will never disappear. In the end, no matter how many evidence scientists find, people who believe in creationism will always find an excuse as to why not to believe in the evolution theory, and people who believe in evolution theory will always find a way why not to believe in creationism.
Key words: evolution theory, creationism, educational system, secularization.