Thanks, this was very useful.
But I do nor quite see why "Apple doesn't want application environments which allow others to bypass their tools" applied to
" interpreted languages".
GG
On 2012-09-01, at 11:52 AM, William Adams <will.adams at frycomm.com> wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2012, at 3:28 PM, George Gratzer wrote:
>>> 1. I was told that the problem is that TeX is an interpreted language and Apple does not allow interpreted languages in iOS. Is this true?
>> Apple doesn't want application environments which allow others to bypass their tools. There was a clause specifically forbidding such, but it has since been lifted.
>>> 2. I believe that OSX implementations of TeX use Unix commands to do TeX. What happens on an Android device?
>> Android runs on a Linux architecture, so one can use native tools.
>>> 3. If an iOX implementation has to be sandboxed to be sold in the App Store, could one use Textures to typeset? (Is it out of beta?)
>> Textures is the model which one would have to follow to properly get TeX into the App Store AIUI. Textures took the public domain TeX algorithm, placed it w/in their Mac App Code and used it to directly typeset to the screen, which allowed them to have total awareness w/in the app of where a given bit of typeset text was on the screen.
>> William
>> --
> William Adams
> senior graphic designer
> Fry Communications
> Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
>> ----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq> List Reminders and Etiquette: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/> TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/> List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex>