Note: Javascript support is disabled in your web browser. The NZ Notable Trees Register relies on Javascript for site navigation and displaying the location of trees on a Google map. We highly recommend you that you enable Javascript to avoid dissapointment while using this website. For assistance with enabling Javascript, please read this guide.

The NZNTT is actively seeking updated information for all trees in the register. If you have information about this tree that we don't currently have recorded, or wish to advise of an inaccuracy please use our information submission form to help us build a complete profile of this tree.

It has been more than ten years since we recorded a measurement for this tree. If you are able to provide us with new measurements please fill out the information submission form for this tree.

Despite there being no one present to witness the falling of 'Toronui', we can be certain the calamitous event resounded throughout the remote corner of Waipoua Forest where it once held domain.

This mighty tree was thought to have fallen in mid-March 1977 but was not discovered until the following April Easter weekend when the Fletcher and Brown families from Whangamata tramped in to see the tree. They later donated the accompanying image of the fallen tree to The Kauri Museum[1].

Those investigating the tree following its demise found it to be largely hollow. Across its diameter of 4.84m, only 10-12 cm at the outside was sound wood with a further 30 cm of wood being decayed. The remainder was hollow so that when it fell it was said to resemble a large cavern[2].

Is it clear from the early images of the tree that Toronui had been extensively bled for its gum, as was typical of many of our great trees. Knowing what we do today about the relationship between wounding and internal decay it should come as no great surprise that this practice would have played a significant role in 'Toronui’s' demise.

Up until this time 'Toronui' was considered to be the largest living kauri of recent times. It was said to be a well-balanced tree that was not the thickest nor tallest nor longest clean-boled kauri, but was rated at 286.5 cubic metres of merchantable volume, and so was one-sixth bigger than Tane Mahuta at the time[3].

Whilst the discovery and measurement of the tree by forestry worker Jack Boys and ranger Reg Murray occurred sometime in 1926[3], it was not until February 1932 that the first image of 'Toronui' was published in newspapers of the day[4]. Contemporary reports describe the tree:

“The branch spread is enormous, being about two and a-half chains to three chains in width, and there is more timber in some of the branches than in the whole of an ordinary tree.” [5]

“At a point some sixteen feet above the ground there is a little platform where bark and humus have accumulated behind thick masses of astelia. Upon this platform the man is standing in the published photograph. The trunk proper may be considered to commence at this level...At a point six feet above the platform the tree is no less than fifty feet in circumference, while the distance from the platform to the first branch is thirty-eight feet. The trunk shows no taper, but its symmetry is somewhat broken by a series of rounded flanges that traverse its entire length. At regular intervals of four or five feet the bark bears regular rows of deep incisions, the remains of the axescarfs of gum-bleeders, who, in former times, roamed the forest and exploited the trees for gum. The crown, which is lofty and of unusual spread and is supported on great gnarled branches which in themselves dwarf many a forest tree, somewhat offsets the thickness of the trunk and redeems the tree from extreme squatness. Below the level of the platform where, at an unusual height above the ground, the origins of the great, widespreading roots bulge the trunk, the girth of the tree is very materially increased, but it was preferred to record as the true girth the distance round the clean and even bole that rises uniformly above.” [6]

Only 50 years passed from discovery until the day it fell as a result of the hand of man. One might hope that the tree would finally be left in peace but the final chapter came to be written on another Easter weekend in 1982. A tramping party from the Auckland University Field Club walked in to see the fallen giant only to find that vandals had recently burnt the once-enormous log[7].