butlincat's blog - a blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

butlincat's blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

This site is shadowbanned, as daily viewing figures prove since March 2018, when before then the figures were 10 times as much as they have been since. "Shadowbanning" is the act of blocking or partially blocking a user or their content from an online community - see more: What is SHADOWBANNING: Twitter: are you shadowbanned? - truther sites are targeted, eg:NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media - "Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others." - Charles Bukowski

“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption”...so said Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech on March 14, 1968, just three weeks before he was assassinated.

1. I am on hunger strike because I am being refused a proper application for bail and to have my medical records clarified or corrected.

2. Also, both South Wales Police and HM Prison have conspired to confiscate my legal papers, computer, cash and proper access to both telephone and secretarial facilities to defend myself.

3.More importantly, the current reason for ‘HM Partnership Wales’ conspiracy to pervert the

course is just to block my access to both the civic and criminal courts in the UK, in my civil action for damages due to 20 years of South Wales Police bullying.

4. 17 Oct 2011 county Court letter indicates my appeal for further disclosure of 10 MAPPA meetings,in both police stations and their forensic Laboratory, Caswell Clinic, was dismissed as I failed to attend on 28th Sept. 2011.

5. Likewise with BS614159, appeals FD10C00242, FD10C00195 and current JRs,including CO/4298/2011 again because prison refuses my request to contact the court.

8. In September 11 I was transferred from London Police custody for ‘tape recording in court’,

attempting to breakout of Tottenham Police Station, demanding my own lawyers hand over my own legal papers and best of this nonsense, conspiracy by aeroplane to abduct 6 young Nigerian children snatched by Haringey Council.

10. By Sept 11 letters, the Independent Police Complaints Commission IPCC have given the South Wales Police dispensation from an enquiry of their ‘shoot to kill’ policy and painting the ‘machine gun’ a different colour to fool the Jury.

Friday, 25 November 2011

"Government pays out over death of Falklands veteran in Police Custody

(Published on Wednesday, 23 November, 2011)

The government has agreed that the treatment of Christopher Alder byHull police while he died on the floor of a police station in 1998violated his rights under Article 3 ECHR. Mr Alder died after beingdragged unconscious into Hull police station and laid face-down on thefloor of the custody suite with his hands still handcuffed behind hisback. He was bleeding from the mouth and his trousers had come down tohis knees so that the lower half of his body was exposed. He was leftthere face-down breathing through the pool of blood collecting on thefloor by his mouth for 11 minutes until he died. While he lay therethe police officers who had brought him into the station engaged incasual banter and discussed how they could justify his arrest. The police officers involved have never been subject to anydisciplinary or criminal sanction for their behaviour. After JanetAlder brought proceedings in the European Court of Human Rights thegovernment admitted a violation of Article 3 and Article 14 ECHR andalso of the procedural obligations under Articles 2 and 3 ECHR inrelation to the investigation into his treatment and death. Charlotte Kilroy, led by Danny Friedman, and instructed by Liberty,represented Janet Alder, Mr Alder's sister. For the full story as reported on the BBC & Guardian please click onthe hyperlinks.

Maya Wolfe-Robinson and Owen Bowcott The Guardian, Tuesday 22 November 2011 Article history

The government is to apologise to the family of Christopher Alder, who died in a Hull police station.

The government will formally apologise through the European court of human rights (ECHR) to the family of Christopher Alder, a black ex-soldier who choked to death in handcuffs on the floor of a Hull police station 13 years ago.

The "unilateral declaration" made by the United Kingdom to the court is a highly unusual admission of widespread failures in the investigation into the cause of the Falklands veteran's death.

In its statement to the ECHR, the government will concede that it breached its obligations in regard to preserving life and ensuring that no one is subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment. The family is to receive €34,000 (£29,000) from the government in an ex gratia payment and to cover legal costs.

The unusual step of issuing a statement of that sort is a form of settlement and invites the court to strike out the case. The government had fought not to have the case heard in Strasbourg, before lodging an official statement and apology to the Alder family. Its apology is on behalf of Humberside police.

A letter of the apology states: "The government of the United Kingdom regrets the occurrence of the actions which have led to the bringing of the present application, in particular the treatment in custody of the applicant's brother, Mr Christopher Alder, and the anguish that this treatment and his death have caused to his family."

"The government accepts that the lack of an effective and independent investigation in this case constitutes a violation of the procedural obligations in articles 2 and 3 of the Convention. Further, the government accept that the treatment that the applicant's brother received in police custody amounted to a substantive violation of article 3 with 14 of the Convention."

Earlier this month it emerged that Alder's body had mistakenly been left in a mortuary for 11 years after his family believed they had buried him.

His death in April 1998 was one of the most controversial in police custody. Closed-circuit TV footage was recovered showing the 37-year-old father-of-two gasping for air as officers chatted and joked around him. The film showed he received no help from five police officers, who thought he was play acting, as he lost his fight for life. It took 11 minutes for him to stop breathing. Afterwards, as Alder lay dead, monkey-like noises were detected on the audio tape.

After an inquest lasting seven weeks, a jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing, citing "positional asphyxia". Five police officers were prosecuted for manslaughter but the trial was halted when the judge ruled there was no evidence for a conviction. They were later cleared by a police disciplinary hearing of neglect of duty.

Janet Alder, the dead man's sister, said: "It has taken 13 years to break through what I see as a reluctance of the organisations dealing with controversial custody deaths to hold police officers accountable, or to believe or consider whether police officers could be capable of severe maltreatment of citizens within their custody."

"Why or where did Christopher sustain the additional injuries he suffered? Why was another of his teeth missing? Where was his belt? These concerns have never been investigated or addressed.

"It has taken bringing an action in the European court of human rights – and judges there unanimously acknowledging my complaints were admissible after watching the horrific video of Christopher's death - to force the government to apologise for failing to hold the officers responsible accountable.

"It wasn't hard to see that my brother – an ex-paratrooper decorated for his services – was denied his right to life; that his treatment was inhuman and degrading and that race played a part in his death."

Welcoming the UK's declaration, the human rights organisation Liberty, which has supported Janet Alder, said: "The government's unprecedented apology and admission of blatant violations of fundamental human rights are hugely significant and certainly not before time.

Corinna Ferguson, the legal officer for Liberty, added: "More than 13 years on still no one in the police has been held responsible for Christopher's shocking death. Proper accountability is vital in these situations and in future the Independent Police Complaints Commission must take stronger, more decisive action where serious human rights violations occur.

"The offence of misconduct in public office is completely inadequate in these circumstances – as demonstrated by the fact that these officers were somehow cleared of it. Sadly admissions and apologies will matter little if such tragic cases keep occurring."

• This article was amended on 22 November 2011. The original headline stated that he died in a police cell and the original text suggested that Liberty is supporting the entire Alder family. These have been corrected."

IMPORTANT: Some mobile devices do not download MP3s. Please use your desktop computer if this is the case.

Date: 11-18-11

Host: George Noory

Guests: K.W. Kesler, Open Lines
In the first half of the show, paranormal and occult researcher K.W. Kesler provided a brief overview on demons and shared some of his investigations into their demonic activity. Kesler said he was initiated into the world of the paranormal as a teenager, when the confused spirit of a deceased neighbor visited his house and interacted with him. His paranormal research eventually led him into demonology and to houses infested with demons. During one investigation, he reported finding evidence of 12-inch footprints with claws after spreading talcum powder on a home's hard wood floors. Kesler recalled hearing a ghastly shriek from a bedroom and found all of the furniture there turned upside down. Next, an "unearthly rumble, almost like something [was] breaking the time-space barrier, the fabric of known reality," announced the arrival of what he described as a shadow person with glowing red eyes. A Catholic priest was contacted to perform a blessing on the house and afterwards the demonic activity ceased, he added.
Kesler confessed that he was shaken by his most recent case, as he may have inadvertently stumbled upon a possible link between 2012 and the demonic world. According to Kesler, things happened in this house and to this client that he had never seen before, noting an episode where everything in the kitchen cabinets was inexplicably switched with the contents of the refrigerator. Kesler revealed that he asked aloud for the invisible culprit to identify itself and heard a voice on both sides of him whisper the name Lebara—a demon worshipped by the Mayan-related cult of Yoruban. Everybody else experienced this as well, he asserted. Stranger still, Kesler claimed to have witnessed, as it was happening, numerals being scratched into his client's skin. When the unseen assailant finished, the number '406' could be clearly seen, he observed. Kesler said he later realized that there were 406 days from the date of his investigation until December 21, 2012, and believes this could be a sign of biblically catastrophic things to come.
-------------------------------------------------
During Open Lines, Tim from Orange, California, recounted a terrifying confrontation he had with a shadowy figure covered in blade-like spines. Tim said he awoke in total blackness and intense pain to find the creature pinning him down against the bed. Miraculously, he was able to get a hold of a stuffed toy rabbit that he had been compelled to buy the day before and was instantly able to move again and free himself. James in Eugene, Oregon, told George about an encounter with the see-through figure of a little girl that he saw standing in his kitchen one night. The entity was able to exit the house through a small crack in the back door, a space far too small for an actual person to fit through, he explained. Athena, a self-professed demonologist from Burbank, California, talked about the time she was investigating a hospital with her paranormal group and came across a red-eyed apparition in a dark corridor. Camera lights momentarily blocked the entity from view, but as soon as they were moved away she found herself standing face to face with a "black blur,” Athena said.
News segment guests: Jeff Nelken / Douglas Hagmann
Website(s):
•demon101.com
Book(s):
•Demonology 101

Thursday, 24 November 2011

It is disgraceful how MPs and other hypocrites completely ignore the crimes councils committ, in collusion with corrupt judges and solicitors and police. - these criminals must be rooted out, exposed and prosecuted for what they really are - outright criminals - or innocent children and their parents will continue to be tortured by these scum. We have their names﻿

Open Letter to the Attorney General regarding the need for an inquest into the death of Dr David Kelly

Yesterday, I sent by recorded delivery a letter to Dominic Grieve QC, requesting that he apply to the High Court for an order that an inquest be held into the death of Dr David Kelly.

The text of that letter follows below, for reference.

25th October 2010

To:

Dominic Grieve AC

Attorney General

Open Letter

The Death of Dr David Kelly - information indicating that a Coroner-led inquest, taking evidence on oath, is needed.

Dear Attorney General

I write to you to request that you apply to the High Court for an order that a Coroner-led inquest be conducted with respect to the death of Dr David Kelly in 2003, as provided for on the grounds enumerated in Subsection 13(1)(b) of the Coroner's Act 1988.

Of the grounds mentioned in Subsection 13(1)(b) I consider the following grounds potentially to be of relevance in an application to the High Court with respect to the death of Dr David Kelly.

1. Rejection of evidence

2. Irregularity of proceedings

3. Insufficiency of inquiry

4. Discovery of new facts or evidence

As I read Subsection 13(1)(b) any one of these deficiencies is sufficient grounds on which to apply for an order from the High Court. Given persistent public concerns about how Dr Kelly met his death I find it difficult to conceive how the High Court could conclude otherwise than such an inquest in is the interests of justice.

I will list some causes for concern under each of the four headings previously mentioned. In some situations it is not immediately clear whether a particular point of concern should most appropriately be considered under a single heading or multiple headings. To avoid unnecessary repetition I will attempt to list a cause for concern under the single heading that appears to me to be most relevant.

The following lists do not purport to be exhaustive. They simply represent causes for concern that I observed after only a few hours reading the Hutton Inquiry transcripts, the Report and other potentially relvant material, as they refer to matters relating to the cause of death of Dr David Kelly.

Rejection of Evidence

Lord Hutton made it clear in his introductory statement that decisions about who to call to give evidence rested with him. It seems to me that a number of individuals who could potentially have given useful evidence regarding Dr Kelly's death were excluded from giving evidence. I can only assume that Lord Hutton rejected them as witnesses, hence my including them under the "Rejection of Evidence" heading. Lord Hutton's approach to the evidence of these individuals might equally be classified under the "insufficiency of inquiry" heading.

1. A Detective Constable Shields was stated (by DC Graham Coe) to have been present when DC Coe first saw Dr Kelly's body. DC Shields was not asked to give evidence.

2. Dr Eileen Hickey accompanied her colleague, the forensic biologist Dr Roy Green, and spent some 5 hours at the scene where Dr Kelly's body was found. Dr Hickey was not asked to give evidence, nor so far as I can ascertain was her area(s) of expertise explored by Hutton.

3. Dr Green testified that at least three Scenes of Crimes Officers were present at the scene. None was asked to give evidence of what they might have found or seen.

Irregularity of Proceedings

1. When evidence was taken from Dr Roy Green, forensic biologist, he stated in his testimony that his tests were ongoing. He was not asked to give further oral evidence and the results of his tests, so far as I am aware, are not known (at least I can find no public record of the results having been made available to the Hutton Inquiry, or alternatively, made publicly available by the Inquiry).

2. Supposedly, Assistant Chief Constable Page was to give evidence at his second appearance before Lord Hutton about the results of Dr Green's tests. He did not do so in any meaningful way and the absence of information about completed tests conducted by Dr Green was ignored by both Assistant Chief Constable Page and by the Hutton Inquiry. In any case, it was in my view highly irregular that someone who is not a technical expert should be asked to give evidence on a technical subject about which he has negligible or no expertise. In addition, the technical detail of Dr Green's tests was not investigated in oral questioning which seems to me to be grossly irregular and insufficient.

Insufficiency of Inquiry

There are numerous individual points where, so it seems to me, Lord Hutton was negligent in terms of conducting a credible and diligent inquiry, equivalent to an inquest.

This letter, from a retired anaesthetist - published in the Daily Telegraph on 24th August -speaks of the inconclusive nature of one of the secondary averred causes of Dr Kelly's death: co-proxamol poisoning.

'the fact that the blood level of Dp was so low as to be below that necessary for cardio-respiratory dpression suggests that not many tablets ever arrived in the stomach.'

Sir
If David Kelly (Letters, August 23) did not die from ulnar artery blood loss, then can we be sure that death was even due to cardio-respiratory depression after ingesting co-proxamol?

The drug contains dextropropoxyphene (Dp) and paracetemol. Paracetemol overdose can cause death but only in excess of three days after ingestion. Dp can cause death within one hour but usually within a mean of five hours.

As a retired anaesthetist with training in pharmacology, I noted that the stomach was empty of capsules, which indicates the Dp was totally absorbed. But the fact that the blood level of Dp was so low as to be below that necessary for cardio-respiratory depression suggests that not many tablets ever arrived in the stomach. An empty blister pack is not proof of ingestion.

Wrting as a citizen of this country, I feel that there are enough untidy ends in this sad saga to justify a coroner's inquest in which scene-of-crime officers and specialists in pharmacokinetics, forensic pathology, toxicology and vascular surgery can explain inconsistencies.

'There is no mystery over David Kelly's death' proclaims the headline. Well, in one sense you might say that: no mystery, no esoteric ineffables, no transcendent unknown. Of course that is not the sense in which the headline is supposed to be taken - not officially - but it sounds a lot more plausible that 'no room for doubt', 'no stone left unturned, or 'no unresolved issues'.....

According to a recent report in the Independent, a frog-like jump across the lilly pad has transmuted the cause of Dr David Kelly's death from "haemorrhage" (Hutton Inquiry) to "heart attack" (Independent): "Kelly had heart attack, says pathologist" blares the headline.

Dr Jennifer Dyson, a retired pathologist, tells an Independent reporter, "there seem to have been a lot of pills in his stomach". I am not sure she has paid close attention to the forensic reports given to the Hutton Inquiry. Possibly her words reflect a common assumption: that Dr Kelly ingested all 29 of the tablets missing from the three blister packs beside his body - but did he?

Other than the existence of three blister packs with 29 pills missing found at the death scene, there is no real indication that Dr Kelly took all 29 pills, voluntarily or otherwise. There is more evidence that he did not.

•At the Hutton Inquiry, forensic toxicologist Dr Richard Allan, clearly stated that he found only a fifth of one tablet in Dr Kelly's stomach. He did not find the residue of anything approaching 29 pills.

•Dried regurgatative material was found in a line from both corners of Dr Kelly's mouth to his ears - more was distrbuted on the ground beside his body. This suggests that a substantial amount of any drug ingested would have been ejected.

•Although Dr Allan found the amounts of the two components of co-proxamol in Dr Kelly's blood to be possibly consistent with an ingestion of 29 pills, he seemed puzzled that this quantity represented significantly less - more than half - than the amount that would normally cause a fatality.

•Dr Robert Forrest, Home Office forensic toxicologist at the University of Sheffield, points out in a BMJ article that after death, concentrations of a drug increase - sometimes up to tenfold. If that is the case, Dr Kelly may need only have ingested two or three pills for Dr Allan's findings to make sense.

•US army interpreter Mai Pederson, a close friend and colleague of Dr Kelly's towards the end of his life, maintains that he had a medical condition: "unexplained dysphagia" - a condition that makes it very difficult to swallow pills, while food is taken without any problem.

The Independent further records Dr Dyson as saying: "my suspicion would be that he had a coronary attack, brought on by the circumstances he found himself in and the stress that that entailed".

To is that to say, Dr Kelly was found dead in the woods, with wounds to his wrist, pill packets and a knife beside him, but that was just coincidental - he died of a heart attack, nothing to do with poisoning or blood loss? Or does Dr Dyson mean the combination of blood loss and poisoning probably caused a heart attack? Only the latter is plausible - but is it so?

In recent days The Times has published a letter (reproduced below) from nine eminent medical specialists - one of them, Sir Barry Jackson, ex-president of the Academy of Forensic Sciences and past surgeon to the queen. They aver that, absent a clotting abnormality, it is 'extremely unlikely' that anyone would bleed to death from a single severed ulnar artery. In recent television interviews two of them have maintained there is a strong consensus on this point across the medical profession.

Venturing opinions, especially medical ones, without reference to the facts of a case seeds false ideas which take root in the public mind. In fairness to Dr Dyson, she did not baldly state, as the headline claims, that Dr Kelly had a heart attack. The reporter turned her opinion into an assertion.

Lord Hutton's conclusions on how Dr Kelly met his death are unsafe. Even the forensic pathologist to the Hutton Inquiry, Dr Nicholas Hunt, told the news-team at Channel 4 News that he would be 'more comfortable' with an inquest.

Today's Daily Mail reports that only one person in five believes Dr Kelly committed suicide. This was no ordinary death - Dr Kelly was at the centre of a political furore which threatened to bring down the British government.

The medical details surrounding Dr Kelly's death and the circumstantial details are complex. The many facets of the case need to be gathered and forensically analysed with care by independent experts in a public forum. Witnesses must be supoenaed, give evidence under oath and be cross-examined. That diddn't happen at the Hutton Inquiry; a full inquest is essential.

Since his untimely death in July 2003, questions have continued to be raised about the circumstances of Dr David Kelly's death. Many wonder whether he really killed himself and speculate that he was murdered. His sudden death shocked the nation - how could it have happened?

As a specialist practioner in law and medicine, I feel a responsibility to the two professions to air my doubts about a case that bridges both worlds.

Any question of suicide or murder has to follow the determination of the cause of death. To do otherwise risks putting the cart before the horse. It would, for example, be scientifically and logically unsound to assume suicide and then to set about finding evidence to prove it.

Before asking whether the deceased himself or a third party put the bullet in the head, it is necessary to determine first that there was a hole in the head and secondly that the deceased died because of it.

For 1,000 years, coroners have been investigating sudden, violent and unnatural deaths. They have got good at it. Suicide used to be a crime and a finding of self-murder is an unhappy reflection on the victim and his family and friends.

That is why suicide has to be proved to the same high standard as murder. It has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased did the act which killed him with that intention in mind.

The normal inquest process in the case of David Kelly was interrupted by the order of the Government. Lord Falconer, the Lord Chancellor at the time, exercised a rarely-used power to require the Oxfordshire coroner to adjourn his investigation and to give that responsibility to Lord Hutton.

The coroner had the power to compel witnesses to attend and to give evidence on oath. The Government which took our country to war with Iraq chose not to give these considerable powers to Lord Hutton.

Although there were 24 days of evidence taken over two and a half months, the whole of the medical evidence took no more than a half day. The evidence of the pathologist, toxicologist and forensic biologist can be read in 30 minutes. No one could say this was a detailed investigation into the death.

I was trained as a doctor and during my years in medical practice I often had to pass catheters into the radial artery in the wrist. This is where medics usually feel the pulse. It can even be seen pulsating in many people.

Dr Kelly's wrists were not slit. Neither radial artery was cut. This alone is a strange finding in someone who intends suicide by this method.

Deeper in the wrist on the side of the little finger lies the ulnar artery. It is not used for catheterisation because it is too small. Yet Lord Hutton, on the unchallenged evidence of a single pathologist, concluded that Dr Kelly bled to death from the severance of this single small artery in the left hand.

No courtroom drama would be complete without critical witnesses being challenged through the cross-examination process.

Like all barristers, I received a rigorous training in advocacy and, because of its enormous importance, I take time from my practice to train barristers in this art. A skilful cross-examination is often the key to ascertaining the truth.

None of this happened in Lord Hutton's inquiry and witnesses were simply led through prepared evidence. Reading the transcripts, far from providing any sense of satisfaction, leaves me with feelings of frustration. Opportunity after opportunity was lost to pursue answers until every avenue had been thoroughly explored and every "escape route " closed.

At the very end of his evidence, Dr Nichaols Hunt, the pathologist who had conducted the post-mortem, was asked: 'Is there anything else you would like to say concerning the circumstances leading to Dr Kelly's death?'

Such a question gives the witness who is favourably disposed to the questioner an open opportunity to go further than his witness statement. It is NOT a question ever asked in cross-examination as it provides a free pass to an escape route.

Dr Hunt answered: 'Nothing I could say as a pathologist, no'. He is an experienced expert witness. What on earth did that answer mean? He was there to give evidence as a pathologist. He knew that. Everyone knew that. So why did he give that answer? It begged the question whether there was anything else he knew. Was he concerned about any other forensic or factual evidence? These questions were never asked.

Hutton focused on the so-called dodgy dossier and the conflict between the Government and the BBC which, at that time, was more in the public eye. Because it was taken from granted Dr Kelly had killed himself, the medical evidence was insufficiently explored.

In the absence of any bleeding tendency from a clotting deficiency (and there was no evidence of this) fatal haemorrhage from a severed ulnar artery is so improbable that more evidence was essential before such a conclusion could be reached.

If you want to know how much beer has gone from a full pint glass, it is easy. You can either measure how much has been poured out or measure how much remains. To be confident, you would measure both. The same approach should have been adopted in this case.

As it was not, there is no evidence as to whether there was sufficient haemorrhage from the ulnar artery to cause death. The inquiry fell into the trap of the circular argument: Dr Kelly died, therefore he must have lost sufficient blood.

'In my work as a barrister I meet many medics but I have never met a single doctor who has disagreed with the propostion that is is extremely improbable that haemorrhage from a single, severed ulnar artery would ever be a primary cause of death.'

Yet this extreme unlikelihood was never explored with Dr Hunt. Whatever the reason, this was a serious failure of the Hutton Inquiry. It has understandably led to a suspicion of cover-up. This could not have been the cause of death, the argument goes. If it were not the cause, then what did cause his death? Was it something Dr Kelly did to himself, intending to cause his own death, which has not yet been discovered? Was it part of some elaborate plan by others to end his life?

The only way to stop the many theories which abound is for there now to be a thorough and open investigation by way of a fresh inquest. Surely the Government realises that the way to foster conspiracy theories is to be secretive and to resist calls to disclose all the medical evidence.

We should pay tribute to Dr Kelly. He was a brilliant man who did his best in the service of this country. He deserves our gratitude and respect. We owe it to him and ourselves to ensure the true cause of his death is ascertained.

Dr Michael J Powers QC is a barrister specialising in medical causation and a Fellow of the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians to which he is an appointed examiner.

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 2:36 AM 0 comments Links to this post 13th August 2010

TIME FOR A PROPER INQUEST INTO DR KELLY'S DEATH

Sir

Amid the continuing interest surrounding the death of the government weapons inspector, the late Dr David Kelly, we wish to express our concern about the conclusion as to the cause of death in the light of the information now in the public domain. It is extremely unlikely, from a medical perspective, that the primary cause of death would or could have been haemorrhage from a severed ulnar arter in one wrist without any evidence of a blood clotting deficiency.

This small artery, deeper in the wrist than the larger radial artery used to palpate the pulse, would have retracted on being severed and within a short time blood loss would be expected to have ceased.

Insufficient blood would have been lost to threaten life. Absent a quantitative assessment of the blood lost and of the blood remaining in the great vessels, the conclusion that death occcurred as a consequence of haemorrhage is unsafe.

The inquiry by Lord Hutton was unsatisfactory with regard to the causation of death. A detailed investigation of all the medical circumstatnces is now required and we support the call for a proper inquest into the cause of Dr Kelly's death.

DR MICHAEL J POWERS QC

Barrister, Medical Practioner and Examiner to the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Royal College of Physicians

Sunday, 20 November 2011

"It seems to be a question that comes up regularly: Have we found evidence of alien life forms? Conspiracy theorists are going nuts with some strange images from China's Gobi Desert found on Google Maps.

The first of these images was taken of some huge structures in Dunhuang, Jiuquan, Gansu, just north of the Shule River, Gizmodo said. This image is a rectangular grid that looks a bit like the entangling city streets without buildings. It's about a mile long and 3,000 feet wide. Fox said some have claimed this formation is a replica of the streets of Washington, D.C.

Another image was also taken north of the Shule River, Gizmodo said. This one is also a grid structure comprised of a series of squares that is littered with debris from exploded vehicles. Gizmodo noted that the image was taken west of a large electrical or radio station.

The Telegraph pointed out that all of the images were taking less than 100 miles from Jiuquan, which is where China's space program is headquartered. Could the images have some relation to alien life? Were they caused by UFOs? Is this China's version of Area 51?

The rest of the images are even more inexplicable. There's another grid made up of either squares or holes that iss more than 18 miles long. Another looks like a target with three jets in the middle and debris radiating out from the center. Gizmodo also discovered various unidentified buildings. One looks like an airport and another is a giant complex about 10 miles by five miles.

No one seems to have a concrete explanation of what these images are. It's possible Google Maps was hacked and a clever prankster inserted overlays that people have interpreted in rather wild ways.

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Mystery of the 'alien corpse' woman stored in her fridge for two years (why do they all turn up in Russia?)

Russian woman kept alien before it was 'confiscated' by authorities

Third 'alien' sighting in Russia in recent months

Experts claim country is 'hotbed of UFO activity'
By Chris Parsons
If the aliens really are landing, this latest picture seems to confirm that their first port of call on Earth will be Russia.
After other claims of extraterrestrial life turning up in Siberia, the latest is from a Russian woman who says she kept a frozen alien corpse in her fridge.
The mysterious 'lifeform' was reportedly kept by Marta Yegorovnam in her fridge in the western Russian city of Petrozavodsk for two years, while she took five pictures to prove its existence.
Intelligent life? The 2ft high creature was apparently stored in Marta Yegorovnam's fridge in western Russia for two years
'Crash victim': The 'creature' was said to have been retrieved from a UFO crash site in 2009. It has an enormous head, bulbous eyes and one stick-like arm

Heading for Earth? The alien in Miss Yegorovnam's fridge has conveniently been removed by men from the 'Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences'

The 'body', the third alien sighting in Russian in recent months, was reportedly retrieved by Miss Yegorovnam from a UFO crash site near her summer house in 2009.
She says she approached the flaming wreckage and crumpled metal which she described as 'unbearably hot' and near the twisted hulk lay the dead alien.

Lost in space: Researchers say aliens may be in our solar system (we're just not looking hard enough to see them)

ET? We have never met him, insists the White House

RIGHTMINDS: It's a fridge Jim... but not as we know it

The 'creature' is two feet long, has an enormous head, large bulbous eyes and an appearance somewhere between a fish and a humanoid.

It also appears to have what looks like a string-like arm protruding from its body.

Proof at last? This screen grab shows an apparent UFO on the ground in Siberia earlier this year with what appears to be an unearthly being to its right and four other beings directly in front of the glowing craft
Naturally, Miss Yegorovnam did what most would in the same situation and stored the alien in her fridge for two years, according to Unexplained Mysteries.

The website reported that two men turned up at her home a few days ago and confiscated the corpse for investigative purposes, claiming to be from the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

'The possibility this could be a genuine alien should not be discounted'

The footage was unearthed by noted paranormal writer and expert Michael Cohen.
Mr Cohen, 40, said: 'This could be an elaborate hoax, however the possibility that this might be a genuine alien should not be discounted.
'Russia is a hotbed of UFO activity and possible alien craft has been tracked by both military and civilian agencies.

'In all likelihood most alien beings would look strange to us, much like this specimen.'

This latest claim from Russia comes after footage filmed in August in the remote Irkutsk region of Siberia appeared to show a strange glowing craft and five aliens walking about in the snow.

Alien life? This strange 'body' was said to have been discovered by two walkers close to Irkutsk, Siberia, in a renowned hotspot for extraterrestrial behaviour

Students Timur Hilall, 18, and Kirill Vlasov, 19, admitted their 'find' was just a stunt and the alien was made from bread

In April, two students who claimed to have recovered a body from a UFO crash site admitted that the creature was in fact made out of bread.

Timur Hilall, 18, and Kirill Vlasov, 19, shot the video that showed the alien's mangled remains frozen in snow, also in Irkutsk, Siberia.

The pair were questioned by police over their 'extraterrestrial discovery' but admitted to their stunt.

But not before their creation became an internet sensation, drawing almost 700,000 hits on YouTube.

Their find was deemed serious enough for the Kremlin to get involved and a spokesman from the Russian interior ministry confirmed the hoax.

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

The charge of "criminal damage" laid against Maurice Kirk {seen here pointing to the metal sheet covering where the safety-glass window was that he smashed whilst trying to escape illegal incarceration in Tottenham police station} has been dropped,{due to "lack of evidence" - how laughable as the evidence is plain to see - in the pic the window he smashed is shown replaced by a metal sheet, and the event was filmed by police CCTV in the room in the police station!! Such is the criminality in the British police!} lest the facts surrounding the MUSA case {of 6 illegally removed children from their Nigerian parents} came to light. Maurice is a supporter for the family and a strong campaigner for them, hence his silencing and diabolical treatment whilst in Cardiff prison. First - a beating. What next?
See more - http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/ ...b.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"If you put me back into that prison, they will kill me." Cardiff Magistrates Court, Tuesday, Nov. 15th

These were Maurice's words as the Magistrates Court took a lunch break today.

His supporters saw his swollen ankles. He had told them not only about the freezing cell, but also the 17 prison officers who had beaten him. First and foremost prison officers 344 and 140.

The conspiracy to kill him is as fully fledged by South Wales Police regarding Maurice, as Haringey Council wants to see the Musa parents dead. For victims need to be silenced when they have evidence - whether it's about police corruption or child stealing.

It is dangerous to be right, when the state is wrong! It is not enough to falsely imprison him for nearly eight months, to take his computer, cheque books, credit cards and mobile phones.

If sectioning and bankrupting doesn't work, killing is the "last resort" for "royalle protected" criminals. Normal criminals at least need to fear prison!...

When leaving the court, one of the supporters asked whether he knew that the charges in Haringey were dropped yesterday. He asked "why didn't anybody tell the court?" But the judge ruled he won't take anything from the public gallery.

The four supporters heard Maurice tell the court that Prison Officer 395 had said "we have you in the block again and we're going to break you, you f... ing b...d.

Should Maurice die in prison, we at least know who the culprits are and who will be covered up, once again...

The limit of 56 days arrest is over this Thursday...

Can the magic of the internet save the lives of victims??? The Chaplain's telephone number is 02920 923 233.

Sunday, 13 November 2011

This message is being sent to every MP and many other public figures in an effort to tell you about the dreadful conspiracy involving the CPS Wales, the South Wales police, certain dubious members of the judiciary and others concerning MAURICE JOHN KIRK, who has been on hunger strike in Cardiff prison for some weeks because of certain matters. His own reasons for being on hunger strike are detailed below in his own list.

Maurice Kirk has been denied many of his human rights whilst in prison and in the courts. Bail applications have been refused to be given to the courts, to name just one right hes been refused. Fake medical reports have been fabricated which ensured Mr. Kirk was imprisoned, not for the first time, with a view to have him permanently sectioned to a secure mental hospital forever, despite the medical report being totally false based on complete lies - I would ask you to specifically check the report made by a certain doctor regarding Mr. Kirk having a brian tumour - he most definatly does not and this false report made by a certain doctor was believed in court before which had Mr. Lirk nearly sent to a mental hospital forever AND IS BEING USED AGAIN in the same manner in Mr. Kirks upcoming court case.

What I say is no fabrication as this report was, neither do I hoax or joke.

Certain parties wish Mr. Kirk silenced forever because of what he can divulge, hence the false report to get him locked away forever. However, Mr. Kirk has a strong network of supporters who only wish is that justice is done, and is seen to be done, and it is with that principal I write to you today to tell you of these gross breaches of the law by certain people trying to imprison Mr. Kirk forever because of what he knows about certain things.

The attatched MAPPA pages show many irregularities, as do his phone and written messages I have recorded and put on my site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com , along with his letters and other details which show the corruption and other travesties of the law he speaks of by what should be reputable, responsible authority figures. They most definatly are not. They are biased to cover up their own crimes, and crimes of their so-called "friends" in high places.

I have tried to alert the authorities as to what is going on regarding these outright perversions of justice in our courts regarding Mr. Kirk but all I have received back is a message of sarcasm from an organisation who should know better - the "South Wales Police"

From:Cardiff@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

Sent:31 October 2011 11:59:17

To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Cc: ACPO.Staff.Office@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

I have not replied to the e-mail, I presume you will make a corporate response.

Should these people not be dealing with the conspracy against this man Maurice J. Kirk and the laws that have been broken rather that sending meaningless sarcastic messages which clearly show they intend to do nothing regarding the many laws that have been broken and overlooked regarding Mr. Kirks outright victimisation and illegal incarceration? The message I had sent to the party above told of the prison denying even Mr. Kirk was on hunger strike at all, that they had refused to weigh him, give him medical treatment for bleeding stomach ulcers, refused him admission to a hospital according to "orders of someone high up" - even denying him a blanket for his freezing cell, and other sundry denials. Surely these people are paid very highly to act more responsibly and not to waste valuable police time writing to me to show their outright contempt of the laws they are meant to uphold.

I would ask you to please look at my detailing of Mr. Kirks plight at the site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com and at Mr. Kirks own site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com and http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com where he details the unacceptable crimes against him by authority figures who are paid very highly by us, the taxpayer, to uphold the laws and not to break them.

This is a true sworn statement.

Thank you.

this message sent to every MP and EuroMP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a message concerning Mr. MAURICE KIRK who is at present on hunger strike in Cardiff prison – no. A7306AT.

The process of law is not being allowed for this man, hence my notifying you, the Crown Prosecution Service Wales, and your police force, and many media worldwide. His basic Human Rights have been taken away by prison staff, police, and you – Crown Prosecution Service, Wales.

Mr. Kirk has been trying to appeal:

ref. BS614159 KIRK v S WALES POLICE

Mr. KIRK and was prevented from going to court on the 28th September – the prison refused to give Mr. Kirk appeal documents to file an appeal – the county court on the 17 October 2011 answered his letter saying they were refusing to give him Court of Appeal papers.

You are hereby notified of these actions.

Whilst in prison Maurice Kirk has been denied a doctor for the last 2 weeks, has lost 14 kg since his entry into Cardiff prison, and has bleeding stomach ulcers which demand medical attention which the prison has refused. All mail is now refused for Mr. Kirk in prison, and he is in an unheated cell and has been refused blankets to compensate for the cold, and other basic rights such as being denied the purchase of postage stamps.

More importantly has also been denied access to the hospital because of “orders from someone high up”.

This message will be sent {and was} by Recorded Delivery Royal Mail on the 28th Oct. 2011 to:

CPS Wales

20th Floor, Capital Tower

Greyfriars Road

Cardiff CF10 3PL

and to others.

From Maurice Kirk 25 Oct. 2011:

FAO HMP Cardiff Governor / Cardiff Courts

1. I am on hunger strike because I am being refused a proper application for bail and to have my medical records clarified or corrected.

2. Also, both South Wales Police and HM Prison have conspired to confiscate my legal papers, computer, cash and proper access to both telephone and secretarial facilities to defend myself.

3.More importantly, the current reason for ‘HM Partnership Wales’ conspiracy to pervert the

course is just to block my access to both the civic and criminal courts in the UK, in my civil action for damages due to 20 years of South Wales Police bullying.

4. 17 Oct 2011 county Court letter indicates my appeal for further disclosure of 10 MAPPA meetings,in both police stations and their forensic Laboratory, Caswell Clinic, was dismissed as I failed to attend on 28th Sept. 2011.

5. Likewise with BS614159, appeals FD10C00242, FD10C00195 and current JRs,including CO/4298/2011 again because prison refuses my request to contact the court.

8. In September 11 I was transferred from London Police custody for ‘tape recording in court’,

attempting to breakout of Tottenham Police Station, demanding my own lawyers hand over my own legal papers and best of this nonsense, conspiracy by aeroplane to abduct 6 young Nigerian children snatched by Haringey Council.

10. By Sept 11 letters, the Independent Police Complaints Commission IPCC have given the South Wales Police dispensation from an enquiry of their ‘shoot to kill’ policy and painting the ‘machine gun’ a different colour to fool the Jury.

11. HM Prison refuses to release my faxes from my lawyer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Police force describes inspector who was part of South Wales paedophile ring as 'abhorrent'

■LETTER 13 NOV. TO EVERY MP + LORD + OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES WHO ARE MEANT TO HELP PEOPLE WHO ARE OPPRESSED OR TORTURED:

■Dear Sir/Madam,

This message is being sent to every MP and many other public figures in an effort to tell you about the dreadful conspiracy involving the CPS Wales, the South Wales police, certain dubious members of the judiciary and others concerning MAURICE JOHN KIRK, who has been on hunger strike in Cardiff prison for some weeks because of certain matters. His own reasons for being on hunger strike are detailed below in his own list.

Maurice Kirk has been denied many of his human rights whilst in prison and in the courts. Bail applications have been refused to be given to the courts, to name just one right hes been refused. Fake medical reports have been fabricated which ensured Mr. Kirk was imprisoned, not for the first time, with a view to have him permanently sectioned to a secure mental hospital forever, despite the medical report being totally false based on complete lies – I would ask you to specifically check the report made by a certain doctor regarding Mr. Kirk having a brian tumour – he most definatly does not and this false report made by a certain doctor was believed in court before which had Mr. Lirk nearly sent to a mental hospital forever AND IS BEING USED AGAIN in the same manner in Mr. Kirks upcoming court case.

What I say is no fabrication as this report was, neither do I hoax or joke.

Certain parties wish Mr. Kirk silenced forever because of what he can divulge, hence the false report to get him locked away forever. However, Mr. Kirk has a strong network of supporters who only wish is that justice is done, and is seen to be done, and it is with that principal I write to you today to tell you of these gross breaches of the law by certain people trying to imprison Mr. Kirk forever because of what he knows about certain things.

The attatched MAPPA pages show many irregularities, as do his phone and written messages I have recorded and put on my site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com , along with his letters and other details which show the corruption and other travesties of the law he speaks of by what should be reputable, responsible authority figures. They most definatly are not. They are biased to cover up their own crimes, and crimes of their so-called “friends” in high places.

I have tried to alert the authorities as to what is going on regarding these outright perversions of justice in our courts regarding Mr. Kirk but all I have received back is a message of sarcasm from an organisation who should know better – the “South Wales Police”

From:Cardiff@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

Sent:31 October 2011 11:59:17

To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Cc: ACPO.Staff.Office@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

■NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

■I have not replied to the e-mail, I presume you will make a corporate response.

Should these people not be dealing with the conspracy against this man Maurice J. Kirk and the laws that have been broken rather that sending meaningless sarcastic messages which clearly show they intend to do nothing regarding the many laws that have been broken and overlooked regarding Mr. Kirks outright victimisation and illegal incarceration? The message I had sent to the party above told of the prison denying even Mr. Kirk was on hunger strike at all, that they had refused to weigh him, give him medical treatment for bleeding stomach ulcers, refused him admission to a hospital according to “orders of someone high up” – even denying him a blanket for his freezing cell, and other sundry denials. Surely these people are paid very highly to act more responsibly and not to waste valuable police time writing to me to show their outright contempt of the laws they are meant to uphold.