Forums

Is homosexuality right or wrong?

Thanks for the elaboration people. We cant choose our own sexuality so we have no right to judge others based on their sexuality. I have not one but two christian friends who are gay so that kind of blows some things open here, or maybe not. The point is why do you think homosexuality is wrong is it you were brought up to be biased against it. I hold no grudge against anyone who thinks homosexuality is wrong but I think that is just ignorance talking.

Thanks for the elaboration people. We cant choose our own sexuality so we have no right to judge others based on their sexuality. I have not one but two christian friends who are gay so that kind of blows some things open here, or maybe not. The point is why do you think homosexuality is wrong is it you were brought up to be biased against it. I hold no grudge against anyone who thinks homosexuality is wrong but I think that is just ignorance talking.

Homo sexual isn't wrong in my opinion (I'm straight though). Everyone has his/her own taste. Being judged for it by others makes the other people sad instead of you. Choose what you want with pride and keep your self-respect high.

However I think that homo-sexuals haven't met the "one" for them in the other gender, which means they are very picky. Since I'm not attracted to my own gender I can't really tell a lot about it. I think they find it exciting to play with their own gender for excitement. This doesn't make it wrong though. However everything has it's limitation.

For some, seeing a homo couple making out may be disguisting which makes it "wrong".

Just follow your own taste, you live to die and life's short so enjoy while it lasts wether it's wrong or not in the end it's your own choice.

Homo sexual isn't wrong in my opinion (I'm straight though). \r\nEveryone has his/her own taste. Being judged for it by others makes the other people sad instead of you. Choose what you want with pride and keep your self-respect high. \r\n\r\nHowever I think that homo-sexuals haven't met the "one" for them in the other gender, which means they are very picky. Since I'm not attracted to my own gender I can't really tell a lot about it. I think they find it exciting to play with their own gender for excitement. This doesn't make it wrong though. However everything has it's limitation. \r\n\r\nFor some, seeing a homo couple making out may be disguisting which makes it "wrong". \r\n\r\nJust follow your own taste, you live to die and life's short so enjoy while it lasts wether it's wrong or not in the end it's your own choice.

However I think that homo-sexuals haven't met the "one" for them in the other gender,

There isn't a "one" for them in the other gender because they don't feel that way towards the other gender. This is like saying there is a "one for you in the same gender. You don't feel that way towards the gender you are so there isn't someone of the same gender you would feel is "the one".

[quote]However I think that homo-sexuals haven't met the "one" for them in the other gender,[/quote]\r\n\r\nThere isn't a "one" for them in the other gender because they don't feel that way towards the other gender. This is like saying there is a "one for you in the same gender. You don't feel that way towards the gender you are so there isn't someone of the same gender you would feel is "the one".

once again. the person who has a problem with it cant do anything but give arguments that are being countered. the the most simple question is still unanswered. why is it wrong? what makes something wrong?

once again. the person who has a problem with it cant do anything but give arguments that are being countered. the the most simple question is still unanswered. why is it wrong? what makes something wrong?

Because they're irrelevant. Bonabos. No one cares. First of all, it's bonabos. There's no need to capitalize it. Secondly, this is why you shouldn't learn to argue from the Internet. Bonabos aren't the ultimate answer to homosexuality. You can't say "BUT BONABOS DO IT!" to everything. Bonabos are hardly ever relevant.

Whether or not non-human animals do it, first of all, does not answer the question of whether it's natural for humans. Some animals breath underwater, yet most definitions of natural vs. unnatural clearly view humans breathing underwater as unnatural.

Moreover, whether or not it's unnatural or natural has nothing to do with morality. That's the argument you should be making, not ranting about bonabos.

[quote]WHY U IGNORE BONABOS![/quote] Because they're irrelevant. Bonabos. No one cares. First of all, it's bonabos. There's no need to capitalize it. Secondly, this is why you shouldn't learn to argue from the Internet. Bonabos aren't the ultimate answer to homosexuality. You can't say "BUT BONABOS DO IT!" to everything. Bonabos are hardly ever relevant.\r\n\r\nWhether or not non-human animals do it, first of all, does not answer the question of whether it's natural [i]for humans[/i]. Some animals breath underwater, yet most definitions of natural vs. unnatural clearly view humans breathing underwater as unnatural.\r\n\r\nMoreover, whether or not it's unnatural or natural has nothing to do with morality. That's the argument you should be making, not ranting about bonabos.

*Bonobos (this is a very common error, so Imma point it out only once)

breath

*breathe

You did impressively well overall, Zeno. I applaud you.

Zeno told me to correct his spelling for him.\r\n\r\n[quote]Bonabos[/quote]\r\n\r\n*Bonobos (this is a very common error, so Imma point it out only once)\r\n\r\n[quote]breath [/quote]\r\n\r\n*breathe\r\n\r\nYou did impressively well overall, Zeno. I applaud you.

Secondly, this is why you shouldn't learn to argue from the Internet. Bonabos aren't the ultimate answer to homosexuality. You can't say "BUT BONABOS DO IT!" to everything. Bonabos are hardly ever relevant.

If it were just bonobos in of themselves, this would be true. However, when using the "homosexuality isn't unnatural" argument by showing it occurs in other animals, you can point out many similarities. It occurs in other mammals and obviously isn't itself unnatural. It's not a stand alone argument, but it's not a faulty one either.

Moreover, whether or not it's unnatural or natural has nothing to do with morality. That's the argument you should be making, not ranting about bonabos.

This argument was being made in tandem, except that the other side wasn't giving us any reason on why it's immoral, so there was nothing to respond to on that front.

[quote]Secondly, this is why you shouldn't learn to argue from the Internet. Bonabos aren't the ultimate answer to homosexuality. You can't say "BUT BONABOS DO IT!" to everything. Bonabos are hardly ever relevant.[/quote]\r\n\r\nIf it were just bonobos in of themselves, this would be true. However, when using the "homosexuality isn't unnatural" argument by showing it occurs in other animals, you can point out many similarities. It occurs in other mammals and obviously isn't itself unnatural. It's not a stand alone argument, but it's not a faulty one either.\r\n\r\n[quote]Moreover, whether or not it's unnatural or natural has nothing to do with morality. That's the argument you should be making, not ranting about bonabos.[/quote]\r\n\r\nThis argument was being made in tandem, except that the other side wasn't giving us any reason on why it's immoral, so there was nothing to respond to on that front.

people using the fact that its natural dont say "its natural so its moral". they use it against the argument "its unnatural so its immmoral". people slowly forgot that its not an argument but a statement to counter an argument. besides, ill say it again: if not compared to animals what IS natural? we arent comparing it to one species we are comparing it to MOST species. if we wouldnt do that we wouldnt know what is natural. i could easily say that having red hair is unnatural because people with red hair are a minority in this world

people using the fact that its natural dont say "its natural so its moral". they use it against the argument "its unnatural so its immmoral". people slowly forgot that its not an argument but a statement to counter an argument. besides, ill say it again: if not compared to animals what IS natural? we arent comparing it to one species we are comparing it to MOST species. if we wouldnt do that we wouldnt know what is natural. i could easily say that having red hair is unnatural because people with red hair are a minority in this world

Flip a Coin...

Play free online games at Armor Games!

We strive to deliver the best online games experience on the internet, with thousands of free online games for kids, access to free mmorpg games, free online games for girls, online rpg games, fun online flash games, and more. We offer free flash games in many different genres: online shooting games, online puzzle games, online war games, free online car games, free online hidden object games and dozens more. This is the best place on the web to play online games for free... play on Armor Games! No matter what game style you prefer, we've got it here.

As one of the biggest free gaming websites, we offer thousands of new game reviews and ratings, making it easy for gamers to find new games every day. We offer only the best games from developers Jmtb02, Krin, ConArtist, Joey Betz, Tony Lavell, Louissi, Gameinabottle and of course Armor Games develops some of the best games around.

About Armor Games (ArmorGames.com, Armour Games, or Armored Games)

We are dedicated to providing our players the best online gaming experience on the internet! Visit every day to discover new games, achieve high scores, and participate in one of the most active gaming communities.

Submit a Game

Have your game played by millions of gamers! Armor Games welcomes game submissions from talented game developers. Not every game makes the cut, but if it does, we'll promote it on Armor Games and give you all the credit and link back to your site. Submit your game here and good luck!