Are the Figures Portrayed in Old Minstrel Shows Still in Existence Today?

Minstrel shows were a popular form of entertainment consisting of comic skits, dancing and music, usually performed by white people in blackface in the period following the Civil War. These shows generally noted for negative stereotypical portrayals of blacks. Although minstrels were aired a long time ago, their influence is still felt nowadays in many ways. One may be surprised to realize that the demeaning caricatures of blacks once seen in the shows are in existence in a more refined manner.

A good example is found in the way African-Americans are perceived abroad. Foreign audiences who have never been privilege to meet African-Americans often watch them play the “bad” roles in movies; young scantily clad girls are seen as whores in music videos while their rugged male counterparts are perceived as criminals or drug addict. They are popularly seen in music videos as happy money sprayers living in ghettos. Many people would argue that the rappers who produce such song videos are only being real but little do they know that these acts only stigmatize them as lavish and nonchalant individuals who they unknowingly claim to be. This marks the whole point the white inventors of minstrel shows were trying to prove – present a false image of an intelligent and diligent race.

Furthermore, the effects of these ill notions presented by minstrel shows are not farfetched at all. I can vividly remember a young colleague asking me the most demeaning question I’ve ever been faced with a few months ago. He innocently asked if it was true that blacks in Africa are cannibals. This I found quite offensive but I rebuffed it and convinced him he was misinformed and that there is no element of truth in it. Another false figure displayed in the minstrel shows that has lived with us ever since is notion that blacks are sub-human being. They clearly taught the lesson that black is inferior to the white. As seen in the Ethnic Notions documentary, black kids were eaten by wild...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...﻿ The Minstrelshow set the stereotypes for African Americans in the 19th century. With the shows mimicking demeanor and use of black face, the minstrels showed the way they believed African Americans acted. The interlocutor would wink to the audience to establish the mutual understanding that the performers are differentfrom the audience but only because the performers are in the blackface. Acknowledging that the blackfaced white actors are only in black face and are not actually "black" is an important destinction that entertains the white audience and performers. The mintrels would say that the performance was not aimed to discuss the direct connect between the white mintrel performers and the African Americans. The concern of the mintrels was not to portray a race with a culture, but to show how they portray a race with a culture, but to show how they portrayed African Americans to act; opening a gateway to stereotypes according to color.
When African American minstrels made their way to the entertainment stage, they eventually changed the words, jokes, and look of mintrelsy. Although there were changes to the contest of the show, the African American minstrels maintained the original idea of performing color and performing gender for the entertainment and satisfactory of the audiences. The African American...

...MinstrelShows
A minstrelshow also called minstrelsy was an American entertainment with-holding comic skits, variety acts, dancing, and music, performed by white people with a blackface or, especially after the Civil War, black people with a black face. A man named Edwin Pearce Christy founded the Christy Minstrels basically setting out the plan and plot for the shows.
Minstrelshows ridiculed black people, making jokes and other musicals about them. They portrayed black people as dim-witted, lazy, buffoonish, superstitious, happy-go-lucky and musical. The typical minstrel performance followed a three-act plot structure. They first danced onto stage then exchanged wisecracks and sang songs. The second part featured a variety of entertainments, such as the funny stump speech. The final act consisted of a slapstick musical plantation skit or a send-up of a popular play. The "father of American minstrelsy" was Thomas Dartmouth "Daddy" Rice (who in 1828 developed a song-and-dance routine where he impersonated an old, crippled black slave he knew named Jim Crow. Although the minstrelshows were extremely popular, being "consistently packed with families from all walks of life and every ethnic group", they were also controversial. Racial integrationists announced them as falsely showing happy...

...could have the nigger show back again in its pristine purity, I should have little use for opera." -- Mark Twain
Blackface performers are, "...the filthy scum of white society, who have stolen from us a complexion denied them by nature, in which to make money, and pander to the corrupt taste of their white fellow citizens." -- Frederick Douglass
Minstrelsy: The Bane of Show Business
The two quotes above show just how different society was during the time of slavery and the consideration of African-Americans to be a lesser version of humanity. Mark Twain is believed by the majority of society to be a well-learned and creative author, however he was no exception to the corruption and slander of the African race since he was Caucasian. Frederick Douglass, an African-American, saw the brutality and was disgusted at the slander of his race. Douglass was unafraid to comment on the blatant disgrace of his race.
During the early 1800s, Thomas Dartmouth “Daddy” Rice fathered the foundation of American minstrelsy when he performed a sing and dance routine of African influence, dressed with blackface and tattered clothes, he embodied a persona by the name of Jim Crow, a popular name throughout the slave culture. Minstrelsy eventually became more popular after a man named Daniel Decatur Emmett and three of his companions dressed up in the incorrigible blackface and performed African-like music with instruments and calling...

...of 1692 and wild accusations of a subversive culture that threatened to tear away at the fabric of society are at the center of the film. Originally conceived in the 1950’s during the red scare, it is well known and accepted that Miller sought to highlight the similarities with the ongoing persecutions of accused communist sympathizers. The mass hysteria and destruction of the individual at the hand of society’s values reflected in the play perfectly encapsulated the atmosphere of 1950’s America. Miller’s thought provoking play was viewed then with much criticism, drawing the ire of the Right, due to its implied message of hypocrisy and subconsciously questioning what he viewed as malfeasance. But does Miller’s “The Crucible” still resonate today? I will argue that it does. In doing so, I feel it is imperative to try and understand the initial reaction to the play and how it mirrored the times. I will then look for similarities in the present day citing examples from the past eight years in particular. There are three main attributes of “The Crucible” that I will be focusing on which include fear tactics, power struggles, and challenge to conformity. In examining these within the context of the play I will seek to draw parallels not only with the 1950’s but present day America as well.
The story revolves around the accusations from a vengeful girl, Abigail, whose past affair with an older married man, John Proctor, leaves her...

...subsequently established an era of unprecedented economic growth in capitalist economies. It was within this era that Karl Marx had observed the deprivation and inequality experienced by men of the proletariat, the working class, who had laboured excessively for hours under inhumane conditions to earn a minimum wage while the bourgeoisie, the capitalist class, reaped the benefits. For Marx it was this fundamental inequality within the social and economic hierarchy that had enabled capitalist societies to function. While Marx’s theories, in many instances have been falsified and predictions invalid, his ideas about class struggle and conflict being a motivator for change is still relevant in contemporary society. The disparity of wealth between occupations in Australia demonstrates that class stratification is still inherent within society and the recent Qantas airline dispute is a relevant example of this.
Marx’s theory of class struggle originates with his belief that “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx & Engel, 1848). Marx had established that conflict between classes was the key driving force of history and the main determinant of social change. For Marx, conflict originates with the deterioration of a ‘false consciousness’ and the subsequent acquisition of a unified ‘class consciousness’. Marx argued that that proletariat was under the influence of a ‘false consciousness’ brought about...

...Is equity still relevant today?
Prior to the Norman conquest in 1066 , different areas of England were governed by different systems of law. William the conqueror gained the English throne in 1066 and began standardizing the law. “Itinerant justices” were able to discuss the various customs of different parts of the century. The principle of ‘stare decisis’ grew up and by 1250 a ‘common law’ has been produced. Common law is the basis of our law today. It is an unwritten law that developed from customs and judicial decisions. However, common law was very technical and had a lot of loopholes as it was operated by the writ system and the remedies given were only damages.
Therefore equity, which means ‘fairness’, was created by Lord Chancellor and Chancery courts to overcome any problems associated with the common law, because of the right justification it was thought to give. As it was developing, equity had no fixed rules and each Chancellor gave judgment according to his own conscience. This led to the criticism about the outcome of cases and John Selden, an eminent seventeenth century jurists, declared, “Equity varies with the length of the Chancellor’s foot”. Equitable remedies are discretionary, they are only allowed if the common law remedies are plainly inadequate. Equity introduced a few remedies which the common law could not provide. These include injunctions, specific performance, rescission and rectification....

...Values Portrayed in Popular Media Today
Values Portrayed in Popular Media
ENG 122
January 23, 2012
Values Portrayed in Popular Media
Values portrayed in popular media and the reason is because their is always something
going on in the media everyday. Also, the media plays a major role in the generation of
the young children in the world today. What is media? “Media is defined as the means
of communication for the radio, television, newspapers and magazines that reach or
influence people widely“. (Dictionary.com) How is the media and influence on the
generation today? Comparing how it was when I grew up in my generation, with
the generation today? How can we help change the mind of the generation coming
up today?
The generation today listen to the radio or either watching TV all the time, and they
also live on the internet. The media portrays the generations today to follow behind
rappers, TV stars and celebrities for our young children to look up to. According to a
article I read on Credo, it states that “Many students of contemporary society believe
That the mass media are capable of shaping consciousness in fundamental ways, and
that media influence on society is thus enormous”. (www.credo reference.com)
The media to me...

...replacing complicated systems with more simpler ones, all of which help to gain profit.
Max Weber used the bureaucracy to represent how the society changes over time whereas Ritzer sees fast food restaurants as a better way to describe how societies change and become more of a contemporary thought pattern. Ritzer understands McDonaldization as a process in which it is slowly taking over the world, he says it can be summarised by just one small quote “the principle of fast food restaurants are coming to dominate more and more sectors of the American society as well as the rest of the world” (Ritzer 2008). He states that the past, present and future of McDonalization has appeared from the iron cage to fast food restaurants which shows that rationalisation is still developing, the iron cage is a way to describe it in the past and McDonaldization helps to describe it in today’s society, rationalisation will continue to progress until other contemporary sociologist find different ways to define it. Although McDonaldization offers many advantages as it gives customers quick food at low prices it also has disadvantages just like the bureaucracy they both suffer from irrationality, like fast food restaurants a bureaucracy can be a ‘dehumanising’ place to work and be served by. Many things are developed by technical devises rather than the human hand (Wynyard 1998)
McDonaldization is viewed to be one of the reasons behind obesity. This is due to...