Sign up for our Daily Newsletter and never miss a story.

This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

What do you call a crisis that kills a hundred thousand Americans? It all depends on who does the dying.

At first, it seemed like it was mostly white people infected and/or killed by the coronavirus.

<p>As the scale of the coronavirus pandemic dawned on Americans during the month of March, most of the media attention was given to white people like Tom Hanks, while the <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/coronavirus-outbreak-revives-dangerous-race-myths-pseudoscience-n1162326" target="_blank">danger</a> of coronavirus to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/04/11/coronavirus-black-america-racism/" target="_blank">black</a> people went largely <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/stop-looking-away-race-covid-19-victims/609250/" target="_blank">underreported</a> by American media. It was around this time when both the media and the White House <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/" target="_blank">decreed</a> it a national emergency.</p><p>The early cases that made the news and caught everybody's attention were mainly wealthy white people who'd traveled to the West Coast from Asia and the East Coast from Europe.</p><p>Trump's official <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/" target="_blank">national emergency declaration</a> came on March 11, and most of the country shut down or at least went partway toward that outcome. The economy crashed and millions of Americans were laid off, but saving lives was, after all, the number one consideration.</p><p>Trump put medical doctors on TV daily, the media was freaking out about refrigerated trucks carrying bodies away from New York hospitals, and doctors and nurses were our new national heroes.</p><script async="" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2" data-ad-client="ca-pub-8573325940152694" data-ad-slot="NationalMemo\/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2" style="display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script><p>And then came April 7, 2020.</p><p>I remember that week vividly; it was as if a light switch had been flipped, and I commented on it on the air at the time (and many times since).</p><p>April 7 was the day that America learned that the majority of the people who were dying from COVID-19 were either elderly, black or Hispanic. Not so many white guys, after all.</p><p>Exactly one month earlier, on March 7, Trump had played golf at his club in West Palm Beach, met with Brazilian strongman Jair Bolsonaro at Mar-a-Lago, and visited the CDC headquarters in Atlanta. Over the previous week, U.S. deaths had <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_the_United_States#March" target="_blank">risen from single digits to more than 20</a>.</p><p>During the following month, all hell broke loose in the United States and around the world. Italy and Spain were melting down, as was the U.S. economy; cases were exploding in New York. The nation was united in the hope that the disease could be stopped dead in its tracks.</p><p>Then came April 7, when the <em>New York Times</em> ran a front-page story with the headline: "<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/us/coronavirus-race.html" target="_blank">Black Americans Face Alarming Rates of Coronavirus Infection in Some States</a>." Across the American media landscape, similar headlines appeared at other outlets, and the story was heavily reported on cable news and the network news that night.</p><p>American conservatives responded with a collective, "What the hell?!?"</p><p><a href="https://www.mediamatters.org/coronavirus-covid-19/rush-limbaugh-slams-news-coverage-coronavirus-racial-disparity-how-they-stop" target="_blank">Rush Limbaugh declared</a> soon after that "with the coronavirus, I have been waiting for the racial component." And here it was. "The coronavirus now hits African Americans harder—harder than illegal aliens, harder than women. It hits African Americans harder than anybody, disproportionate representation."</p><p>Claiming that he knew this was coming as if he were some sort of a medical savant, Limbaugh said, "But now these—here's Fauxcahontas, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris demanding the federal government release daily race and ethnicity data on coronavirus testing, patients, and their health outcomes. So they want a database to prove we are not caring enough about African Americans…"</p><script async="" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3" data-ad-client="ca-pub-8573325940152694" data-ad-slot="NationalMemo\/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3" style="display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script><p>It didn't take a medical savant, of course. African Americans die disproportionately from <em>everything</em>, from heart disease to strokes to cancer to childbirth. It's a symptom of a racially rigged economy and a health care system that only responds to money, which America has conspired to keep from African Americans for more than 400 years. <em>Of course</em> they're going to die more frequently from coronavirus.</p><p>But the <em>New York Times</em> and the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/07/coronavirus-is-infecting-killing-black-americans-an-alarmingly-high-rate-post-analysis-shows/" target="_blank"><em>Washington Post</em></a> simultaneously publishing front-page articles about that disparity with regard to COVID-19, both on April 7, echoed across the right-wing media landscape like a Fourth of July fireworks display.</p><p>Tucker Carlson, the only primetime Fox News host who'd previously expressed serious concerns about the death toll, changed his tune the same day, as documented by <a href="https://www.mediamatters.org/" target="_blank">Media Matters for America</a>.</p><p><a href="https://www.mediamatters.org/coronavirus-covid-19/tucker-carlson-coronavirus-crisis-may-have-passed-well-see-it-looks-it-may" target="_blank">Now, he said</a>, "we can begin to consider how to improve the lives of the rest, the countless Americans who have been grievously hurt by this, by our response to this. How do we get 17 million of our most vulnerable citizens back to work? That's our task."</p><p>White people were out of work, and black people were most of the casualties, outside of the extremely elderly. And those white people need their jobs back!</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/BadFoxGraphics/status/1247684528698777600" target="_blank">Brit Hume joined</a> Carlson's show and, using his gravitas as a "real news guy," intoned, "The disease turned out not to be quite as dangerous as we thought."</p><p>Left unsaid was the issue of whom it was not "quite as dangerous" to, but Limbaugh listeners and Fox viewers are anything but unsophisticated when it comes to hearing dog-whistles on behalf of white supremacy.</p><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/07/coronavirus-is-infecting-killing-black-americans-an-alarmingly-high-rate-post-analysis-shows/?arc404=true" target="_blank">More than 12,000</a> Americans had died from coronavirus by April 7, but once we knew that most of the non-elderly victims were black, things were suddenly very, very different. Now it was time to quit talking about people dying and start talking about white people getting back to work!</p><p>It took less than a week for Trump to get the memo, presumably through Fox and Stephen Miller. On April 12, he <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/13/trump-fire-fauci-coronavirus/" target="_blank">retweeted a call to fire Dr. Anthony Fauci</a> and declared, in <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1249712404260421633" target="_blank">another tweet</a>, that he had the sole authority to open the United States back up, and that he'd be announcing a specific plan to do just that "shortly."</p><p>On April 13, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce <a href="https://www.uschamber.com/coronavirus/implementing-national-return-to-work-plan" target="_blank">published a policy paper</a> titled "Implementing a National Return to Work Plan."</p><p>Unspoken but big on the agenda of corporate America was the desire to get the states to rescind their stay-home-from-work orders so that companies could cut their unemployment tax losses.</p><p>When people file unemployment claims, those claims are ultimately paid for by the companies themselves, and with a high number of claims, a company will see a substantial future increase in their unemployment insurance premiums/taxes. If the "stay home" orders were repealed, workers could no longer, in most states, file for or keep receiving unemployment compensation.</p><p>On April 14, Freedomworks, the billionaire-founded and -funded group that animated the Tea Party against Obamacare a decade earlier, <a href="https://www.freedomworks.org/content/economic-recovery-starts-lifting-small-businesses-back" target="_blank">published an op-ed</a> on their website calling for an "economic recovery" program including an end to the capital gains tax and a new law to "shield" businesses from lawsuits.</p><p>Three days after that, Freedomworks and the House Freedom Caucus issued a joint <a href="https://www.freedomworks.org/content/freedomworks-echoes-house-freedom-caucus-call-safe-and-swift-reopening-us-economy" target="_blank">statement</a> declaring that "it's time to re-open the economy."</p><p>Freedomworks <a href="https://www.freedomworks.org/content/reopenamerica-rally-planning-guide" target="_blank">published</a> their "#ReopenAmerica Rally Planning Guide" encouraging conservatives to show up "[i]n-person" at their state capitols and governors' mansions, and, for signage, to "Keep it short: 'I'm essential,' 'Let me work,' 'Let Me Feed My Family'" and to "Keep them homemade."</p><p>One of the first #OpenTheCountry rallies to get widespread national attention was April 18 in <a href="https://www.fosters.com/news/20200419/protesters-plan-second-reopen-nh-rally" target="_blank">New Hampshire</a>. Over the next several weeks, rallies had metastasized across the nation, from <a href="https://www.koin.com/news/health/coronavirus/oregon-uniting-for-liberty-rally-salem-capitol-reopen-economy/" target="_blank">Oregon</a> to <a href="https://www.azmirror.com/2020/04/16/covid-19-rally-to-re-open-arizona-planned/" target="_blank">Arizona</a>, <a href="https://delawarestatenews.net/coronavirus/delaware-group-sets-may-1-rally-to-oppose-excessive-quarantine/" target="_blank">Delaware</a>, <a href="https://www.wral.com/coronavirus/reopennc-rally-planned-for-tuesday-in-downtown-raleigh/19062732/" target="_blank">North Carolina</a>, <a href="https://www.nbc12.com/2020/05/05/rally-reopen-virginia-planned-wednesday/" target="_blank">Virginia</a>, <a href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/2020/5/1/21244518/reopen-illinois-rally-thompson-center-coronavirus-covid-19-stay-at-home-order" target="_blank">Illinois</a> and elsewhere.</p><p>One that drew particularly high levels of media attention, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/03/michigan-gretchen-whitmer-lockdown-protest-racism" target="_blank">complete with swastikas, Confederate flags, and assault rifles</a>, was directed against the governor of Michigan, rising Democratic star Gretchen Whitmer.</p><p>When Rachel Maddow began reporting on meatpacking plants that had become epicenters of mass infection, the conservative <a href="https://www.rawstory.com/2020/05/wisconsin-gop-judge-covid-19-is-spreading-due-to-meat-packing-workers-and-not-regular-folks/" target="_blank">Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court</a> pointed out that the virus flare wasn't coming from the "regular folks" of the surrounding community. Although the majority of the meat plant workers were Hispanic and the majority of the surrounding communities were white, her defenders suggested it was just a slip of the tongue.</p><p>Nonetheless, the conservative meme was now well established.</p><p>About a third of the people the virus killed were old folks in nursing homes. Which, right-wing commentators said, could be a good thing for the economy because they're just "<a href="https://www.salon.com/2020/03/27/trumps-death-cult-finally-says-it-time-to-kill-the-useless-eaters-for-capitalism/" target="_blank">useless eaters</a>" who are spending our Medicaid and Social Security money and are on death's door anyway.</p><p>For example, Texas's Republican Lt. Governor <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2020/03/24/dan-patrick-economy-coronavirus-deaths-notdying4wallstreet/" target="_blank">Dan Patrick told Fox News</a>, "Let's get back to living… And those of us who are 70-plus, we'll take care of ourselves."</p><p>A conservative <a href="https://www.rawstory.com/2020/04/california-official-calls-for-reopening-so-coronavirus-can-kill-off-the-old-and-the-weak-it-would-also-free-up-housing/" target="_blank">town commissioner in Antioch</a>, California, noted that losing "many elderly [people]… would reduce burdens in our defunct Social Security System" and "free up housing." He added, "We would lose a large portion of the people with immune and other health complications. I know it would be loved ones as well. But that would once again reduce our impact on medical, jobs, and housing."</p><p>It came to Trump's attention that the biggest outbreaks were happening in prisons and meatpacking plants, places with few white people (and the few whites in them were largely poor and thus seen as disposable). Trump's response to this was to issue an <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-delegating-authority-dpa-respect-food-supply-chain-resources-national-emergency-caused-outbreak-covid-19/" target="_blank">executive order</a> using the Defense Production Act (which he had hesitated to use to order the production of <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-wont-use-the-defense-production-act-for-medical-supplies-but-hell-use-it-for-meat/2020/04/29/2ed2b170-8a4d-11ea-8ac1-bfb250876b7a_story.html" target="_blank">testing or PPE equipment</a>) on April 28 to order the largely Hispanic and black workforce back into the slaughterhouses and meat processing plants.</p><p>African Americans were dying in our cities, Hispanics were dying in meatpacking plants, the elderly were dying in nursing homes.</p><p>But the death toll among white people, particularly affluent white people who were less likely to be obese, have hypertension or struggle with diabetes, was relatively low. And those who came through the infection were presumed to be immune to subsequent bouts, so we could issue them "<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/30/immunity-passports-could-speed-up-return-to-work-after-covid-19" target="_blank">COVID Passports</a>" and give them hiring priority.</p><p>The only thing Republicans had overlooked in their master plan to help out the master race was the very real consequence of Reaganomics across the states of the former Confederacy.</p><p>Southern states had fought against any sort of state- or federally-funded health care plans since Reconstruction, claiming libertarian ideology while, in fact, their animus was directed at people of color.</p><p>Caught in those crosshairs, however, just as had been the case prior to the Civil War, were poor whites.</p><p>Many of the same political and economic factors that put African Americans at risk for the past two centuries were also used against poor whites.</p><p>In the 1930s when Huey Long was Louisiana's senator and governor, he explicitly reached out to impoverished white people.</p><p>As the <em>Encyclopedia Britannica</em> <a href="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Huey-Long-American-politician" target="_blank">notes</a>, "Always the champion of poor whites, he effected a free-textbook law, launched a massive and very useful program of road and bridge building, expanded state university facilities, and erected a state hospital where free treatment for all was intended. He was opposed to excessive privileges for the rich, and he financed his improvements with increased inheritance and income taxes as well as a severance tax on oil…"</p><p>Long's "every man a king" stump speech was particularly intolerable to Louisiana's wealthy oligarchs, opening as it did with the line, "Is that a right of life, when the young children of this country are being reared into a sphere which is more owned by 12 men than it is by 120 million people?"</p><p>In 1935 Long was assassinated, and it wasn't until 1965 that President Lyndon Johnson would try to get any aid to poor Southern whites with Medicaid and food stamps; that, too, was offensive to the conservative white political structure in the South.</p><p>As a result, poor whites in the South are likely to suffer from the diseases and lack of access to health care that make African Americans throughout the country so vulnerable to COVID-19.</p><p>And, over the past 40 years, Reaganism has encouraged the spread of deep white poverty from red state to red state. White obesity, diabetes and hypertension are, therefore, overrepresented in poor rural areas as far away as Nebraska and Mississippi.</p><p>In fact, the <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2020/05/07/as-states-reopen-covid-19-is-spreading-into-even-more-trump-counties/" target="_blank">Brookings Institution just reported</a> that of the counties where the virus has most recently exploded, 151 of them went for Trump in 2016 (by an average of 12 percent) and only 25 backed Clinton.</p><p>Today, Trump, Fox, and his followers think COVID-19 just kills the elderly, blacks and Hispanics—and they seem comfortable with the needless deaths of people they think are different from themselves.</p><p>As it spreads into rural white America, however, they're about to learn otherwise.</p>

President Donald Trump's signature food aid program is sending less relief to New York and New England than other parts of the country, even though the Northeast has the most coronavirus cases. Some states — Maine and Alaska at least — have been left out completely so far.

The regional imbalances are an unintended side effect of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's strategy in hiring private contractors to distribute food, the agency said. It is now looking for ways to reach areas that were passed over.

<div>
<p>
“USDA is evaluating how we might expand access to the program in areas that are underserved," the agency said in a statement.
</p>
<p>
Out of $1.2 billion in the program's first round, just $46 million is going to the Northeast. The region, which encompasses New York and New England, has the most coronavirus cases but received the least money of any region except the Mountain Plains, which has almost half as many people.
</p>
<p>
By contrast, the Southwest (including Texas) is getting more than five times as much money even though it has only about 50 percent more people and a quarter as many coronavirus cases.
</p>
<p>
Put another way, the Northeast has 10 percent of the country's population and 33 percent of COVID-19 cases but is receiving only 4 percent of food relief dollars, according to ProPublica's analysis of data from the USDA, the Census Bureau and Johns Hopkins University.
</p><script async="" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2" data-ad-client="ca-pub-8573325940152694" data-ad-slot="NationalMemo\/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_2" style="display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>
<p>
The pandemic is also taking a severe economic toll on New England. According to an <a href="https://www.bostonfed.org/news-and-events/news/2020/04/neppc-covid-analysis.aspx">analysis</a> by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, unemployment claims from March 21 to April 11 equaled 16.6 percent of the region's total workforce, and 36 percent of renters and 18 percent of homeowners in New England are at risk of being unable to make their payments.
</p>
<p>
Trump and his daughter Ivanka have <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1259198107029508096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1259198107029508096&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.propublica.org%2Farticle%2Fwedding-planner-caterer-brand-builder-trumps-food-aid-program-is-paying-100-million-to-unlicensed-dealers">personally</a> <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/15/ivanka-trump-pushes-food-distribution-program/5181791002"></a>heralded the USDA's new program, which is meant to deliver boxes of fruit, vegetables, meat and dairy to food banks, churches and other nonprofits. Instead of using its regular system for buying and distributing food, which typically handles nonperishable items in bulk, the USDA awarded contracts to private distributors.
</p>
<p>
The process was unusually fast for government contracting: Companies had only a week to apply, and the USDA announced the winners a week later.
</p>
<p>
Although the USDA announced the contracts on a regional basis, the agency had no method for allocating funding to each region — it just depended on which companies won their bids. “The amounts and locations awarded were based on the offers received and the evaluation of those offers," the USDA said.
</p>
<p>
The relative dearth of distributors in the Northeast is making it harder for food banks there to meet the needs of their communities. In Rochester, New York, the Foodlink food bank consulted with dozens of companies that it has worked with about applying for the USDA contracts. But none of those bids were successful, and Foodlink didn't have a relationship with any of the winning contractors.
</p>
<p>
Now the food bank is in touch with the winning distributors but has yet to receive any shipments. As a result, it doesn't have much fresh food to give out, even as the city's service hotline is getting a surge of calls from people needing food, according to Foodlink's chief strategy officer, Mitch Gruber.
</p><script async="" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3 -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3" data-ad-client="ca-pub-8573325940152694" data-ad-slot="NationalMemo\/NatMemo_Middle_Desktop_3" style="display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script>
<p>
“We could have had more food sooner, and they could have guaranteed more geographic representation across the nation if the program had been designed around food banks and not around distributors," Gruber, who's also a Democratic member of Rochester's city council, said in an interview. “Everyone's genuinely trying to best connect surplus at farms with increased need at food banks, and I'm glad the USDA is trying to fill that void. The smartest way to have done it would be to fund the food banks and work backwards to food distributors and vendors to serve them, rather than to have the USDA work with distributors and vendors."
</p>
<p>
Thus far, the USDA has awarded $1.2 billion worth of contracts to distributors, out of $3 billion available overall. The agency said the contracts were competitively evaluated based on the companies' ability to deliver.
</p>
<p>
But some of the winning bids raised eyebrows because the companies appeared to lack experience in food distribution or <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/wedding-planner-caterer-brand-builder-trumps-food-aid-program-is-paying-100-million-to-unlicensed-dealers">did not have a proper USDA license</a>. At the same time, some applicants with more traditional qualifications said their bids were denied on mistaken grounds.
</p>
<p>
Three key Democrats on the House Agriculture Committee asked the USDA to explain how it evaluated the bids, including if it checked companies' licenses and considered equity across regions.
</p>
<p>
“We share USDA's goal of providing effective and timely assistance to families, farmers, and food supply businesses like food distributors," Reps. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI), Jim Costa (D-CA), and Marcia Fudge (D-OH) said in a <a href="https://agriculture.house.gov/uploadedfiles/05_22_2020_farmers_to_families_food_box_-_reps._plaskett_costa_fudge.pdf?utm_campaign=388-520">letter</a> Friday to Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue. “We are concerned, however, that contracts were awarded to entities with little to no experience in agriculture or food distribution and with little capacity to meet the obligations of their award."
</p>
<p>
The USDA defended its selections. “A lot of groups and organizations have some very great abilities that you wouldn't necessarily be able to assess by looking at the name of the organization," Greg Ibach, the USDA's under secretary for marketing and regulatory programs, said on a conference call with reporters on Tuesday. “We feel confident that between our screening process and our audit process that we will be able to assure that those companies will be successful in fulfilling the responsibilities and the design of our program."
</p>
<p>
One of the rejected applicants was a local distributor in Maine called Native Maine Produce &amp; Specialty Foods. The USDA told the company its application was missing a signature on a certain page, according to vice president of sales Jimmy Davolio. Davolio said he rechecked the paperwork and the signature was there.
</p>
<p>
“I don't know what we could have missed," Davolio said.
</p>
<p>
No other companies serving Maine won contracts either, so the state is receiving no food boxes, according to the state Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry.
</p>
<p>
“We were disappointed we didn't get it, but now I'm more disappointed that the folks in Maine aren't getting those funds," Davolio said in an interview. “We bid where we thought we could help. Now I feel terrible."
</p>
<p>
The state is sorely missing the relief as food bank demand has tripled in some places, at a statewide average of about 35 percent, according to Kristen Miale, president of the Auburn-based Good Shepherd Food Bank, which serves a statewide network. Maine's growers are also hurting and looking for new customers since their primary buyers — restaurants and the food service industry — have been largely shuttered.
</p>
<p>
“We need to be distributing a lot more food. Our primary constraint is we just don't have enough food to give out," Miale said. “This program would be a huge help."
</p>
<p>
Miale is hoping that the USDA will give Maine distributors another chance, taking into account the logistical challenges of a sprawling, rural state with islands and mountains.
</p>
<p>
“They kind of put out a one-size-fits-all approach and it didn't fit for everybody," Miale said. “So now let's go back and look at it again."
</p>
<p>
Maine's agricultural commissioner, Amanda Beal, formally asked the USDA to reopen the bidding process in the fall to give Maine distributors time to develop a way to participate.
</p>
<p>
“Like all small businesses in Maine, farmers in our state have been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic but are eager to continue to grow food for consumers," Beal said in a <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6922864-AMS-CFAP-Letter-FINAL.html">letter</a> to the USDA on Thursday. “Likewise, many families in Maine need extra support during this unprecedented time, and it has been projected that food insecurity in Maine could increase by as much as 39 percent in 2020 due to COVID-19. We are confident that the Farmers to Families Food Box Program can help provide much-needed support for both, but only if the program can be adapted and flexibility be given to fit individual state needs."
</p>
<p>
In another corner of the country, Alaska was also left with no access to the program. Two companies submitted bids but the USDA didn't accept them, according to Cara Durr, director of public engagement for the Food Bank of Alaska, which serves the entire state.
</p>
<p>
Though Alaska has kept its case count down to only about 400, the shutdowns imposed to control the outbreak have taken a steep <a href="https://iseralaska.org/publications/?id=1801">economic toll</a> and made it harder for remote communities — many inaccessible by road — to get needed supplies. The state's budget is also heavily dependent on oil, whose price has cratered.
</p>
<p>
The Food Bank of Alaska found a workaround where one local company signed on as a subcontractor to a winning bidder. That company is now supplying hard fruits and vegetables such as potatoes, apples and oranges.
</p>
<p>
But they're still not able to receive meat or dairy, and the shipments won't reach outside Anchorage to more far-flung places like Fairbanks, Durr said.
</p>
<p>
“The cost to bring food up to Alaska wasn't factored in," Durr said. “We would have loved to have gotten more through this program. Supporting local in-state vendors when there are applications would have been a much better way to go, for our state at least."
</p>
<p>
<em><a href="https://www.propublica.org/people/beena-raghavendran">Beena Raghavendran</a> contributed reporting.</em>
</p>
<p>
<em><strong>Update:</strong> This article was updated to add a letter from three House Democrats to the USDA.</em>
</p>
<div>
<ul class="ee-ul"><li>
</li></ul>
</div>
</div><script async="" src="http://pixel.propublica.org/pixel.js" type="text/javascript"></script><div></div><script async="" src="http://pixel.propublica.org/pixel.js" type="text/javascript"></script>