The Awareness Center closed. We operated from April 30, 1999 - April 30, 2014. This site is being provided for educational & historical purposes.
We were the international Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse/Assault (JCASA); and were dedicated to ending sexual violence in Jewish communities globally. We did our best to operate as the make a wish foundation for Jewish survivors of sex crimes. In the past we offered a clearinghouse of information, resources, support and advocacy.

Monday, December 31, 2012

The Awareness Center has had the honor of working with Jewish survivors of sexual violence everyday. Often when survivors first call us they are barely able to utter the words "I was sexually abuse or assaulted". We help these survivors to find their first therapist and or help them find legal resources so that they can begin their healing journey. It's incredibly valuable and rewarding work.Survivors choose their own path, making the brave decision to tell a friend, parent or spouse that they were a victim of a sex crime. Admitting what happened is not easy task. The fear of being shamed or blamed for what happened to them is incredibly intense no matter what age they are. One of the most important aspects of The Awareness Center is helping survivors find others who are also survivors. It helps them to know that they are NOT alone. As survivors begin to heal some become more active within our organization. Some quietly help new survivors through difficult times. In past years some survivors have helped out by stuffing envelopes or helping to develop our mailing list. And throughout the years a few survivors started to speak out publicly and write letters to the editors of newspapers, sharing their stories.But no matter how each of us choose to overcome our trauma, all survivors are heroes.At some point in their healing, survivors realize this is about more then just their own healing and or exposing their predator. It's about protecting the next generation. It's about protecting children. It's about changing how our communities treat the innocent and vulnerable -- kids who live in fear, children of today who are afraid to go to sleep at night, children who are crying out for help.That's why The Awareness Center is so critical. Day in and out, we work tirelessly to heal the wounded, protect the vulnerable, and expose offenders and those who cover up sex crimes.Many charities have people that believe in their cause but survivors are different. We do not just believe in the cause, we live it. We do whatever it takes to expose sexual predators as a way to keep our children and unsuspecting adults safe.Just last month we heard about a father who has been molesting his children. The father was someone with a great deal of political clout. Not only are we making sure the adult survivor who called us get the help needed, we are helping the entire family deal with the molestation. Hotline reports were made. We contacted the mother and got her involved in a domestic violence program. We also made sure that the younger siblings were in counseling with highly trained mental health professionals who specialize in working with child sexual abuse. We also helped the offending father find a treatment program.Today we are asking for your help to keep The Awareness Center moving forward. When you donate to The Awareness Center, you are not just helping one survivor to heal, you are also helping Jewish communities around the world. This is not some abstract concept. It's the truth!Your donation will make a difference. It will ensure that our website will continue to be a resource for survivors, families and supporters. It will ensure the phone will be answered every day. It will ensure that a sex offender will continued to be â€œoutedâ€ and our community members will be warned. A donation will help us put the secrets of sexual violence and cover up into the public eye so that reforms will happen and lives will be spared.All donations are tax deductible and can be made either on-line through our website or by sending a check or money order to The Awareness Center. WE NEED YOUR HELP TODAY!We are honored by your presence in The Awareness Center and blessed by your generosity. Your end of year donation will make a difference in the lives of many innocent and vulnerable people who have come forward or are waiting for someone to reach out to them. Thank you for your help and support!Sincerely,Vicki Polin and our Board of Directors

Can you say SEXISM? When exclusion of women hits the basketball courtby Allison Kaplan SommerHa'aretz - December 31, 2012

In
a country where religious and secular children are divided into
separate schools, sport should be a unifying experience. That's not what
happened in my backyard.

The troubling sexualization of little girls was symbolized last year by Na’ama Margolese in Beit Shemesh who was terrorized by Haredim protesting the "provocative" presence of her girls' elementary school near their neighborhood.

It was brought to the forefront in the "exclusion of women" debate, which was burning across Israel just a year ago, but faded over the course of 2012, when the lip service on the topic resulted in little real action to address it - and it has barely seen crossing the lips of politicians as an issue during this year’s election campaign.

But that doesn’t mean it is going away. Last week, a controversy appeared in my backyard, in Ra’anana, my hometown (as well as Naftali Bennett’s…) It happened on the basketball court of all places, at a game in a junior basketball league for fifth-graders.

Team sports for kids - especially soccer and basketball - is a big part of life in our neck of the suburbs, as it probably is in all of suburbia. The problem for Orthodox families is that the mainstream basketball league teams, even in Israel, hold both games and practices on Shabbat.

For that reason, there a national organization exists called Elitzur, promoting sports in the religious public and maintains sports teams across the country that accommodate religious observance - with no games on Shabbat. Elitzur has a long history - it was established in 1939 by the religious Hapoel Mizrachi movement, to encourage sports in the religious community. The vast majority of Elitzur teams are boys' teams, but they field girls’ teams as well.

I’ve always viewed the Elitzur phenomenon as something of a shame. In a country where religious and secular are divided into separate schools, extra-curricular activities such as sports is an area where young Israelis - religious and secular - should be able to experience being on the same team - literally - at a formative point in their lives.

But the Shabbat issue is an issue. At least the Elitzur teams include some non-religious children who choose to participate on their teams, and at least their teams play weekday games against the regular non-religious teams.

And that is exactly what the problem started last week, as was first reported by the Channel 10. The game took place last week between Elitzur Ra’anana against a team from the town of Alfei Menashe. The two teams were ready for the first tip-off when the coach of the Ra’anana team, who had travelled to Alfei Menashe, saw that the Alfei Menashe team had a girl playing on the team - a rosy-cheeked blonde ten-year-old named Shiran Grinbaum.

The Ra’anana coach stopped the game. No girls allowed, he said.

He explained that the game could not continue with Grinbaum on the court, as he was “forbidden to permit the children to play because they are religious boys who observe the prohibition against touching members of the opposite sex” he said, referring to the practice known as “Shomer Negiah,” in which adolescent and adult men and women refrain from any physical contact until marriage. It applied, he said, even though his players were only ten years old.

The Alfei Menashe coach refused to pull Shiran from the game. Following the confrontation, the Ra’anana team went home. Interviewed on television, Shiran said tearfully she was ‘very insulted’ that the game was called off because of her, and that she had cried when, in previous similar circumstances, she had been forced to sit on the bench. Her mother also went on camera, speaking out against the absurdity of these kinds of gender restrictions for children.

The Channel 10 report sparked outrage - particularly when it came to the technical results of the incident. According to Israel's Basketball Association rules, the technical victory of the game belonged to Ra’anana. Officially, Alfei Menashe would be penalized for refusing to pull Shiran from the game, while there were no consequences to Ra’anana’s refusal to play because of a girl’s participation.

The reaction to the story on the social media came fast and furious, with numerous angry posts appearing on the wall of the Israel Basketball Association. Ra’anana feminist activist and columnist Hanna Beit Halachmi protested to Ra’anana mayor Nahum Hofri, calling for an end to all municipal subsidies for organizations like Elitzur that support the exclusion of women.

Beit Halachmi also wrote a letter to minister Limor Livnat saying that this "outrageous and shameful" incident has shocked "Orthodox and non-Orthodox alike.”

She called on Livnat, who holds the dual roles of Minister of Sport and chairperson of the Ministerial Committee on the Status of Women, to take action against Elitzur Ra’anana and its coach – as well as against the Basketball Association - for their discriminatory behavior.

It does seem outrageous to punish a team for refusing to bench one of its members because she is female. And I am confident that the "no playing against a girl" policy is not coming from the children’s parents, but from the Elitzur organization - which, like the Bnai Akiva youth movement and other national religious institutions - has become increasingly stringent when it comes to gender separation.

While no one can stop these groups from moving in their conservative direction, many members of the secular majority ask – as Beit Halachmi has - whether they want their taxes subsidizing groups that would leave a little girl weeping on the bench as her teammates play basketball.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

We are your mother, father,sister, brother, aunt, uncle,cousin, grandparents, neighbors, friends, teacher,psychotherapist, attorney, doctor, dentist, scout leader, camp counselor, rabbi, cantor, co-workers and legislators.Just as in any other faith or group, we make up at least a quarter of the population of our communities.

The Awareness Center needs your help in compiling a list of names of Jewish survivors of sexual abuse and sexual assault who have gone public. If you know of any that are missing from the following picture, please let us know right away so they can be included. If you are a Jewish survivor of a sex crime and want to be included, please forward your name and photograph to: VickiPolin @ aol.com

The purpose of this is photograph is to help Jewish survivors of sex crimes to feel empowered. It's vitally important to remember you are not to blame for being sexually victimized.Both the blame and shame belongs solely to the perpetrator(s) and those who might have assisted in covering up the crime.

As survivors when we stand together we become a very powerful voice and political force to be reckoned with. Remember according to statistics just about 1/4 of the worlds population are survivors. Can you imagine what would happen if our voices became united?

In partnership with the provinces and territories, the Government of
Canada created a National Sex Offender Registry to provide rapid access
by police to current vital information about convicted sex offenders.

The Sex Offender Information Registration Act [SOIRA] was proclaimed as law and came into force on December 15, 2004.

Ensuring Public Safety

The National Sex Offender Registry enhances public safety by
assisting in the investigation of crimes of a sexual nature and
identifying possible suspects known to reside near to the offence site.
An officer is able to request a search for registered sex offenders
living in the area.

Depending on jurisdiction, police agencies may access the NSOR
database directly or through their provincial or territorial
registration Sex Offender Registry Centre. Information such as addresses
and telephone numbers, offence, alias(es), identifying marks and
tattoos of convicted sex offenders are included in the national
database.

The public does not have access to the National Sex
Offender Registry. It is a database that provides Canadian police
services with important information that will improve their ability to
investigate crimes of a sexual nature.

There are penalties (e.g. fines, imprisonment) for offenders who fail
to comply with a registration order or for not giving truthful
information.

The RCMP is responsible for the administration and maintenance of the
database. Police services across Canada are responsible for inputting
the data and enforcing the registration provisions.

According to the police, more than 30 suspects were arrested as part of the investigation, which was described as the first and largest of its kind to ever take place in the country.

"I told them I was 12 and that I was shy, but it didn’t even deter them," an undercover agent involved in the operation said at the time. "They went to great lengths to try to get me to meet with them. The conversations were very sexual in nature. It was appalling."

FAIR USE NOTICESome of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Friday, December 28, 2012

History of The Awareness Center - Our first online support groups and The Anti-Rape Daily Newsletter

Starting around 1997, Vicki Polin joined forces with others who were acting
as counter-missionaries against those who were bombarding Jewish chat rooms in their attempts to proselytize to unsuspecting, unaffiliated Jews. It was soon after that Vicki started volunteering time as a JCOMM
on AOL's Jewish Community online. She started off monitoring the chat rooms and assisting those who attended various lectures in various Jewish chat rooms.

In April, 1999, The Awareness Center got it's start back when
Vicki Polin started transforming her holistic counseling center's web page into the non-profit organization - The Awareness Center, Inc.

It was around that same time that she started creating The Awareness Center she started to offer an online chat room for Jewish survivors of sexual abuse/assault, which was originally based in the space created by the Jewish Community Online.

Within time Vicki realized there was a demand for there to be a daily newsletter to help keep survivors and others interested in what was happening within the Jewish community when it came to the handling of sex crimes, healing resources and just about anything else you wanted to know about sexual abuse/assault but were afraid to ask. It was at that time Vicki Polin created a yahoo group. Early in Jan. 2001, the following Yahoo Group was created, which later changed it's name to The Awareness Center's Daily news and then to the Anti-Rape Newsletter.

To subscribe to our daily newsletter, look for the box on the right hand side of this page.

A civil suit has been filed against Abba Goldberg. This is a case in which serious allegations have been made against Arthur Goldberg of professional sexual misconduct and also of an individual presenting himself as a counselor to provide guidance to at least two young men.

It's important to know that Arthur A. Goldberg is a convicted felon. He was found guilty in 1989 of numerous felonies in multiple jurisdictions. The charges ranged from federal mail and wire fraud to conspiracy counts as a result of a bogus bond writing scheme.

At the time, Goldberg was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment in the Central
District of California, which he served concurrently with a an
Illinois sentence imposed at the same time. It was followed by five
years of supervised probation and a $100,000 fine, eventually paid on
November 24, 1999.

_________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer:
Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or
endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources
meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents

Background information

1991

Scandal Yields Windfall for an Impoverished City (02/04/1991)

2010

National Anti Gay Leader is a convicted felon, con man(02/15/2010)

2012

'Gay cure' therapists, 'cured' student sue California over new law

(10/04/2012)

Gay men sue counselors who promised to make them straight (11/27/2012)

Former APA president: I know of ‘hundreds’ of homosexuals who changed their orientation (06/06/2013)

Gay 'conversion' treatment faces novel court challenges (07/18/2013)

_________________________________________________________________

Background information:Ben Unger and Chaim Levin grew up in Orthodox Jewish homes in Brooklyn. They lived in traditional, socially conservative homes and tried to live up to the expectations of their faith and families.

They were gay, however, and were told they had to choose between being gay and Jewish - as if this were truly possible.

In a desperate search for "help", Ben and Chaim found the "ex-gay" organization Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH). This was the discredited organization founded by Wall Street con artist Arthur Abba Goldberg, who went to prison for massive bond fraud.

Goldberg promised to "cure" both men of their homosexuality and make them straight. He recommended that Ben and Chaim have therapy sessions with Alan Downing, a "life coach" who often conducted his practice out of JONAH's headquarters. Downing is also a senior trainer for the controversial "ex-gay" outdoor retreat, Journey Into Manhood, which is run by the organization, People Can Change.

While Ben and Chaim were in "therapy", Downing admitted that he was still attracted to men. In time, the sessions devolved into a "psychological striptease", where the men were asked to strip completely named and touch themselves.

Both Ben and Chaim say they were harmed by the therapy and consider Downing's actions highly unprofessional, unethical and inappropriate.

Unfortunately, groups like JONAH and People Can Change often place vulnerable people in the hands of unqualified, unhealthy "life coaches" and counselors who are struggling to accept their own repressed sexual orientation. This creates disastrous situations where unhealthy, predatory behavior can occur.

Fortunately, Ben and Chaim have come to accept themselves and now live as out, proud openly gay men. They warn Jewish LGBT youth to avoid fraudulent scams like JONAH and accept themselves.

EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill., Feb. 3 — Frustrated by the roller coaster of high hopes and dashed dreams that this nearly bankrupt city has been riding for years, a Federal district judge has found a way to turn a financial scandal into a windfall for its residents.

The judge, William D. Stiehl, on Thursday sentenced the Wall Street investment firm of Matthews & Wright Inc. to pay $7 million as community service in exchange for a guilty plea to one count of conspiracy and fraud for its role in a $223 million municipal bond issue for a river port that was never built.

United States Attorney Frederick Hess, whose office prosecuted the case, said it was the first time a corporation has been sentenced to perform community service through payment.

Judge Stiehl also established the East St. Louis Community Fund to oversee the spending of the money for the benefit of East St. Louis. The court order calls for the money to go for projects that include education, health care and housing. First $1 Million Surrendered

A representative of Matthews & Wright gave the court a check for $1 million. The firm must outline to the judge within 30 days a plan for an annuity that would provide $1 million a year through 1997. It was also fined $1 million.

Arthur Abba Goldberg

Arthur Abba Goldberg, the former executive vice president for Matthews & Wright who arranged the bond transaction, was sentenced to 18 months in prison. He had pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy and fraud.

David Aufhauser, a Washington lawyer representing Matthews & Wright, said the sentence offered his client solace and even a little pride at being able to do something constructive with the $7 million.

Judge Stiehl formed his plan for overseeing the fund after weeks of research and consultation with not-for-profit foundation professionals. Bruce Reppert, the assistant United States attorney who negotiated the plea agreement, volunteered to serve as counsel to the fund without charge. Six-Member Board for Fund

Judge Stiehl appointed a six-member bipartisan, biracial board for the fund. The $1 million was deposited in the Union Bank of Illinois here, which will act as the fund's trustee. Any project costing more than $50,000 must be approved by the court.

After the judge consulted the Ford Foundation, that organization and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation offered to provide a $40,000 grant to the National Economic Development and Law Center in Berkeley, Calif. The center will use the money to train the fund's board and help it plan.

"East St. Louis has really become known around the country as a symbol of hopelessness and despair and absence of leadership," said Robert Curvin, director of the Urban Poverty Program for the Ford Foundation. 'No Politics or Politicians'

Judge Stiehl bypassed the troubled municipal government in setting up the fund. "There will be no politics or politicians involved with this fund," Judge Stiehl said.

Mayor Carl E. Officer had argued in a Jan. 17 letter to Judge Stiehl that the money should be paid directly to the city. He said that the city was the victim of the fraud and that "the city, not a trust fund, is the entity responsible and accountable for providing services to citizens."

Eric Vickers, a St. Louis lawyer who acts as corporate counsel for East St. Louis, said racism was behind the decision to create the fund. Mr. Vickers and Mr. Officer are black, as are most of the residents of East St. Louis. The judge and the United States Attorneys involved with the case are white.

But Johnny Scott, president of the East St. Louis chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, disagreed with Mr. Vickers. "I see nothing wrong with the concept," he said after the sentencing. "In fact, I applaud it."

Mr. Vickers also said Mayor Officer is under investigation in the bond fraud. Mr. Reppert confirmed that the investigation was continuing, but he declined to confirm or deny that the Mayor was a target.

Judge Stiehl told a packed courtroom on Thursday: "It is important that this fund not be another pie-in-the-sky scheme. It is imperative that their hopes and dreams not be raised, only to be dashed to the ground again, as they were in this case." Scheme Involving the Bond

The scheme to which Judge Stiehl referred was a $223 million bond issue underwritten by Matthews & Wright in 1985 to finance a huge river port that prosecutors said the conspirators in the fraud had no intention of building. The project was billed by city officials as one that would attract industry.

East St. Louis, where 43 percent of the population lives below the national poverty level of about $12,675 a year for a family of four, has been running at a deficit. The city is now about $50 million in debt, and the Chamber of Commerce says that nearly half of its 40,000 residents are unemployed.

What happened in the bond deal, the prosecutors contended, was that Mr. Goldberg used a bogus check drawn on a credit union to guarantee the closing of the bond issue in 1985 before an anticipated unfavorable change in the tax law. At the same time, Matthews & Wright arranged a sham sale of the bonds to a bank on the Pacific island of Saipan, the prosecutors said. The bonds were in fact sold in 1986, the prosecutors said.

Neither the bondholders nor East St. Louis lost money. The Government said Matthews & Wright made money in fees from sale of the bonds and on returns from investment of the money.

_________________________________________________________________

'Gay cure' therapists, 'cured' student sue California over new law

By Mark Morgenstein

CNN - October 4, 2012

(CNN) -- Two therapists who try to turn gay people
straight, along with a student who says he was successfully converted to
heterosexuality, are suing nearly two dozen California state officials,
including Gov. Jerry Brown, saying a new state law infringes on their
civil rights.

Alleged Sex Offender - Arthur Abba Goldberg of JONAH

The plaintiffs' legal
team will file a motion sometime this month seeking an injunction before
the law goes into effect, attorney Matt McReynolds told CNN on
Thursday.

The legislation known as Senate Bill 1172 -- which the state Senate passed in May,
Brown signed into law this weekend, and will take effect January 1 --
prohibits attempts to change the sexual orientation of patients under
age 18.

"We have not seen the state of California go this far before in trying to restrict speech," McReynolds said.

The non-profit Pacific Justice Institute, whom McReynolds works for,filed
the lawsuit Monday in U.S. District Court on behalf of family therapist
Donald Welch, psychiatrist Dr. Anthony Duk, and Aaron Bitzer, who is
studying to become a therapist, and who court papers say "seeks to share
his personal experiences with future patients as a mental health
professional."

The institute describes
itself as a "legal defense organization specializing in the defense of
religious freedom, parental rights, and other civil liberties."

The plaintiffs say
they're seeking a judgment finding the new law unconstitutional,
injunctions against the law's enforcement, and attorney's fees,
according to the legal complaint.

Among other concerns, the
complaint details arguments that SB 1172 violates Californians' rights
to privacy, freedom of religion, and due process.

"Certainly, the religious freedom aspect is very strong in this case," McReynolds said.

The American Psychiatric
Association -- which is the world's largest of its kind, with more than
36,000 members -- has determined that sexual orientation change
efforts, as the complaint calls the controversial therapy, pose a great
risk, including increasing the likelihood or severity of depression,
anxiety and self-destructive behavior for those undergoing therapy.
Therapists' alignment with societal prejudices against homosexuality may
reinforce self-hatred already felt by patients, the association says.

"This bill bans
non-scientific 'therapies' that have driven young people to depression
and suicide," Brown recently tweeted. "These practices have no basis in
science or medicine."

Earlier this year,
psychiatrist Robert L. Spitzer apologized for his 2003 study of
reparative therapy in which he suggested that the practice could help
gays and lesbians become straight. He said the study was deeply flawed.

"I believe I owe the gay
community an apology for my study making unproven claims of the
efficacy of reparative therapy," Spitzer said in a letter to the editor
of the Archives of Sexual Behavior. "I also apologize to any gay person
who wasted time and energy undergoing some form of reparative therapy
because they believed that I had proven that reparative therapy works
with some 'highly motivated' individuals."

But according to the
complaint, when Bitzer underwent "therapy described in the statute as"
sexual orientation change efforts and reparative therapy, he "found it
quite helpful in achieving his goals." Bitzer had "experienced same-sex
attractions. ... However, he never believed the simplistic message of
the Gay Community, which states that 'we are born this way and should
just live accordingly,'" the complaint says.

The case revolves around a legal issue, not a moral one, according to McReynolds.

"It's not a debate in
court about whether reparative therapy is a good thing, or how well it
works, so much as it is a debate of the role of the government dictating
to professionals, patients, and religious institutions what their
options are going to be in that area," he said.

David Pickup, a
spokesman for the National Association for Research and Therapy of
Homosexuality, told CNN on Monday his group would file its own lawsuit
against the new statute.

"We do competent
therapy, therapy that truly works," said Pickup, who said he underwent
such therapy and now administers it to others.

A summons filed on
Wednesday requires that each of the defendants respond to the Pacific
Justice Institute with an answer to the complaint within 21 days after
receiving the paperwork. Beyond Brown, the defendants include state
officials Anna Caballero and Denise Brown, as well as the members of the
California Board of Behavioral Sciences and the Medical Board of
California.

The first scheduled
court hearing in the case is a pretrial scheduling conference on January
22, according to court papers. However, McReynolds said he expects the
court will respond to a motion for a preliminary injunction by setting a
hearing date later this year, prior to the January 1 implementation of
the new law.

CNN's Josh Levs contributed to this story

_________________________________________________________________

National Anti Gay Leader is a convicted felon, con man

South Florida Gay News (SFGN) - February 15, 2011

A joint investigation by the organization Truth Wins Out and the
SouthFloridaGayNews.com has revealed that the spokesperson for a New
Jersey based national religious group seeking to ‘cure’ homosexuals is a
convicted felon who has been hiding his past.

The leader of JONAH, Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality,
Arthur Abba Goldberg, is now also serving as President of his Jersey
City temple. He was sent to federal prison 20 years ago for a conspiracy
to defraud the United States of America.

Additionally, Goldberg is presently the Executive Secretary of NARTH-
the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality.
The group hopes to heal “unwanted homosexuality” through “therapeutic
care.”

One more group he supervises is PATH- Positive Alternatives to
Homosexuality- a coalition of religious, ministerial, and ex-gay groups
promoting “non-gay alternatives to homosexual lifestyles.” He is their
President.

Goldberg, who reinvented himself in 2000 as the founder of JONAH, was
found guilty in 1989 of numerous felonies in multiple jurisdictions.
The charges ranged from federal mail and wire fraud to conspiracy counts
as a result of a bogus bond writing scheme.

Goldberg was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment in the Central
District of California, which he served concurrently with a an
Illinois sentence imposed at the same time. It was followed by five
years of supervised probation and a $100,000 fine, eventually paid on
November 24, 1999.

K. William O’Connor, the U.S. attorney who put him away, said at his
sentencing that Goldberg was “a man who habitually took advantage of
people who were economically dependent upon him; that he did not
hesitate to lie or cheat or cover up to achieve his criminal aim. His
greed has cause incalculable harm...”

Goldberg’s arrest and conviction rocked Wall Street when it went down
two decades ago. A purported whiz kid and investment guru, he had been
often referred to on the Street as “Abba Dabba Do” and “Abba Cadabra.”

Those names and that past were all secreted when Goldberg founded
JONAH after getting out of prison. Abandoning the conspicuously
identifiable middle name of ‘Abba’, Goldberg authored a book for Red
Heifer Press under the name of ‘Arthur Goldberg.’

Titled “Light in the Closet: Torah, Homosexuality, and the Power to
Change,” Goldberg re-created himself as an author and spiritual leader,
purporting to help individuals struggling with their sexual identity,
telling gays “you can change.” He certainly did.

“We have long considered Arthur Goldberg a con-artist, but our
investigation shows he is also an ex-con,” said Wayne Besen, Executive
Director of Truth Wins Out.

“His diabolical past mirrors his dishonest present-day work with
JONAH. Whether it was shady deals on Wall Street or shading the truth on
gay issues, Goldberg is someone who lacks credibility and can’t be
trusted,” said Besen.

“The Torah is the Book of Truth,” Besen concluded, “and Goldberg has now delivered us a book of lies.”

Born in 1940, Arthur Abba Goldberg identified himself his entire life
by using all three of his names, at least until he got out of prison
and started JONAH.

The TWO and SFGN investigation into his past revealed that when he
authored articles for the American University Eagle in 1961 as an
undergraduate, his byline was ‘Arthur Abba Goldberg.’

When he received his bachelor’s degree from American University in
1962 and his law degree in 1965 from Cornell University, the diplomas
were given to ‘Arthur Abba Goldberg.’

When he authored land use articles for the Urban Law Journal in the
early 1970’s as a young lawyer it was under the name of ‘Arthur Abba
Goldberg.’

It was also under the name ‘Arthur Abba Goldberg’ that he was
admitted to the New Jersey and Connecticut Bar Associations, and it was
under that name he served as the executive vice president directing
Matthews & Wright, Inc., a New York underwriting firm, in which he
was a major stockholder.

It was in the capacity as shareholder and vice president that
Goldberg orchestrated a scheme of selling $2 billion in fraudulent
municipal bonds for communities ranging from the impoverished city of
East St. Louis to Chester, Pennsylvania, to the West Pacific U.S.
territory of Guam.

The stories of his criminal acts were methodically detailed in the
Philadelphia Inquirer, a paper based near the Chester community scammed
severely by the fraud.

It was under the name of ‘Arthur Abba Goldberg’ that a United States
grand jury on Guam indicted him in late 1987 on 52 counts of bribery,
fraud, and conspiracy.

On September 26, 1989, ‘Arthur Abba Goldberg’ pled guilty in the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California to three counts
of mail fraud. He was sentenced to 18 months as part of a plea bargain.

The trial had actually been moved to California because so many
residents of Guam had been financially harmed by the bogus investment
scheme it was thought a fair trial in that venue was impossible.

Goldberg and others also indicted at Matthews & Wright had
knowingly conspired together to enter into a fraudulent scheme to sell
fake bond issues but take commissions on them anyway. They arranged to
bribe officials, deceive investors, and issue bogus checks to non
existent parties.

In exchange for underwriting $300 million in bogus deals, Goldberg
and his investment firm, Matthews & Wright, received a fee of $10.5
million. They created the impression these bonds would be used to help
construct desperately needed single family housing in Guam and
elsewhere.

Separately, Goldberg also pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of Illinois to one count of conspiracy to
defraud the United States in another falsified bond-writing scheme. In
that matter, Goldberg participated in a conspiracy to ensure that the
bonds were deemed prematurely to take advantage of a favorable tax law
relating to transactions.

The 900 page presentence report prepared by prosecutors prior to his
sentencing was scathing. It indicated that Goldberg’s conduct was
“knowingly and willfully dishonest and fraudulent.”

K. William O’Connor described Goldberg as having engineered “a
conspiratorial fraud of spectacular scope,” which purposefully duped
“unsophisticated Pacific Islanders.” One witness against Goldberg said
he treated the citizens of Guam as if “they were cannibals.”

O’Connor
said that Goldberg’s deceitfulness crippled Guam’s economy, crushed
investors, undermined public confidence in the bond industry, and cost
the U.S. Treasury millions in lost taxes.

U.S. District Judge Jesse W. Curtis, Jr. then sentenced ‘Arthur Abba
Goldberg’ to 18 months in prison, allowing both the Illinois and
California sentences to run together. He imposed fines and restitution
totaling $400,000, an amount later reduced by an appellate court.

In a separate civil proceeding, the Disciplinary Review Board of the
New Jersey State Bar Association recommended taking away his law
license. They found “Goldberg’s criminal convictions clearly and
convincingly demonstrated his participation in activities that reflected
adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness, and fitness as a lawyer.”

The New Jersey Supreme Court then disbarred Goldberg on November 9,
1995, citing his criminal convictions and his “reckless indifference to a
conspiracy of considerable magnitude.”

New Jersey’s highest court even noted that “We are aware of
respondent’s active involvement in community service and his efforts to
resettle numerous immigrants from the former Soviet Union and Eastern
Europe.” But, they concluded, “Goldberg’s conscious participation in the
illegal activities leading to his criminal convictions outweighs these
mitigating factors.”

In his capacity as the Director of JONAH, Goldberg formed and serves
as a director of a tax exempt 501(c)(3) charitable corporation, whose
website promises that it is “offering hope, compassion, direction and
vitally needed information to gay strugglers, their families, friends,
and surrounding community.” He formed the group using the name Arthur
Goldberg, sans Abba, one month after getting his federal supervision of
five years’ probation concluded.

In a 2001 interview not long after he began his religious crusade,
Goldberg told the Herald News in Paterson, New Jersey, that
homosexuality is the result of “psychological trauma.’ And that “six
months to three years of weekly therapy and prayer can cure it.” He did
not say anything about whether 18 months in a federal prison might also
help.

Today, on the NARTH website, despite his conviction and disbarment,
Goldberg proudly holds himself out as a ‘doctor of jurisprudence,’
displaying the title of ‘J.D.’ adjacent to his listing.

NARTH is one of the country’s most vocal critics of the American
Psychological Association’s position paper concluding that homosexuality
is normal, not aberrational. NARTH advocates the doctrine that
homosexuality is a ‘developmental disorder’ and a ‘treatable condition.’

The ‘Jewish State’ is a central New Jersey newsweekly that Goldberg
gave an interview to in 2007. He identified himself as a former deputy
attorney general and Connecticut law professor, telling the reporter
that “gays have been led astray in terms of your authenticity to
yourself.” Meanwhile, he failed to disclose his criminal past.

“People are not born gay; there’s no such thing as a gay gene,” he
added, complimenting that remark with the statement all gays “can
readapt” from “their gender deficiency.” He then said homosexual
children should be treated the same way as “if a child was addicted to
drugs or alcohol.”

Goldberg is presently living conspicuously as the President of
Congregation Mount Sinai in Jersey City. The temple offers itself out as
a “welcoming environment for all people to express, deepen and
rediscover their Jewish heritage.”

Last year, as a guest in the audience at the end of a Montel Williams
show discussing ex-gays, he shouted from the audience at the host,
interrupting the show, to say gays needed help. You can see it on You
Tube.

“I’ve always been one to try to help the underdog,” he said.

But that is not what Judge Curtis concluded at Goldberg’s sentencing on September 26, 1989.

“I find,” the court stated, “that, Arthur Abba Goldberg, you have
openly conspired against the United States by knowingly and recklessly
engaging indifferently in a series of dishonest acts of considerable
magnitude.”

JONAH’s website brags that it teaches that ‘homosexual strugglers can
journey away from homosexuality with psychological and spiritual help,
peer support, and personal empowerment.’

In 2007, JONAH established a separate division, The Jonah Institute
for Gender Affirmation, to provide research and clinical strategies for
“growth out of homosexuality.”

Maybe Arthur Abba Goldberg should have started a peer group for
“growth out of felonies.” His days of failing to own up to his are
over.

Lawyer: "This is the first time that plaintiffs have sought to hold conversion therapists liable"

(CNN) -- Before Sheldon Bruck told his orthodox Jewish parents he was gay, the teenager looked for a way out of homosexuality.

His search led him to
JONAH -- Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing -- which claimed on
its website to help people "struggling with unwanted same-sex sexual
attractions."

JONAH co-director Arthur
Goldberg promised Bruck, then 17, that "JONAH could help him change his
orientation from gay to straight," according to a consumer fraud lawsuit
filed Tuesday against JONAH, Goldberg and a JONAH counselor.

"This is the first time
that plaintiffs have sought to hold conversion therapists liable in a
court of law," said Samuel Wolfe, a lawyer with the Southern Poverty Law
Center.

The defendants did not
respond to CNN calls and e-mails for comment on the lawsuit, which was
filed Tuesday in Hudson County, New Jersey, Superior Court. A page on
the organization's website touts success stories from the program with
letters from past participants and their family members.

Bruck and three male
plaintiffs contend they were defrauded by JONAH's claim that "being gay
is a mental disorder" that could be reversed by conversion therapy -- "a
position rejected by the American Psychiatric Association four decades
ago," the lawsuit said.

The therapy put them at
risk of "depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior," while
giving them no benefits, the suit said.

Jo Bruck, Sheldon's
mother, and Bella Levin, the mother of plaintiff Chaim Levin, are also
plaintiffs because they paid for their sons' conversion therapy and the
counseling the suit said they needed to recover from it.

The conversion therapy
techniques included having them strip naked in group sessions, cuddling
and intimate holding of others of the same-sex, violently beating an
effigy of their mothers with a tennis racket, visiting bath houses "in
order to be nude with father figures," and being "subjected to ridicule
as 'faggots' and 'homos' in mock locker room scenarios," the suit said.

"As long as you put in the effort, you're going to change," Goldberg told Bruck in the summer of 2009, the lawsuit said.

JONAH counselor Thaddeus
Heffner blamed Bruck's gay orientation "on Bruck for not working hard
enough to change, on his father for being too distant, and on his mother
for being too close to him," the suit said.

Bruck quit after five
sessions, delivered through an online video link, because he
"experienced deepening depression and anxiety leading to suicidal
ideation and feelings of hopelessness about his life," the suit said.

Heffner angrily warned
Bruck that he was "making a big mistake" and "throwing (his) life away"
by "giving into (his) desires" and that he would "never lead a happy
life," but would "lead a life of unhappiness in that unhealthy
lifestyle," the suit said.

Chaim Levin, also an
orthodox Jew, was about to turn 17 in 2007 when he talked to his parents
about his sexual orientation and sexual abuse when he was younger. A
rabbi in his Brooklyn, New York, community suggested to his parents that
they enroll him in JONAH's program.

"You can change if you
just try hard enough," the suit said Goldberg told him. "You just need
to work really hard, we are experts at this. We have helped so many
people."

Levin attended weekly
sessions for 18 months at JONAH's Jersey City, New Jersey, headquarters
conducted by Alan Downing, an unlicensed JONAH counselor who calls
himself a "life coach," the suit said. Downing is named as a defendant
in the case.

The lawsuit described what happened in one of those sessions in October 2008 with Levin, who was 18 at the time.

"Downing initiated a
discussion about Levin's body and instructed Levin to stand in front of a
full-length mirror and hold a staff," the suit said. "Downing directed
Levin to say one negative thing about himself, remove an article of
clothing, then repeat the process. Although Levin protested and
expressed discomfort, at Downing's insistence, Levin submitted and
continued until he was fully naked. Downing then instructed Levin to
touch his penis and then his buttocks. Levin, unsure what to do but
trusting in and relying on Downing, followed the instructions, upon
which Downing said 'good' and the session ended."

Michael Ferguson

Two other plaintiffs -- Benjamin Unger and Michael Ferguson -- described similar incidents in the suit.

"On one occasion,
Downing instructed Unger to beat an effigy of his mother with a tennis
racket, as though killing her, and encouraged Unger to scream at his
mother while beating her effigy," the suit said.

"Conversion therapy was,
in Unger's experience, 'psychological abuse,'" it said. "By the time he
terminated sessions with JONAH, he was deeply depressed and had
commenced taking antidepressant medications."

Downing "picked apart
every human emotion and childhood disappointment" of Unger, to present
them as treatable origins of Unger's orientation, the suit said.

Unger's ability to have
physical and emotional relationships with men was impaired and he was
unable to work for a year, the suit said.

Bruck, Levin, Unger and
Ferguson are "adjusting well" four years after their last conversion
therapy treatments, according to Wolfe. "They have had time to get on
with their lives," he said.

Their lawsuit should put all conversion therapists on notice that they can be held accountable, Wolfe said.

"We really want to bring
this lawsuit to bring attention to this practice that takes place in
many parts of the country, praying on vulnerable young people," Wolfe
said.

Arthur Goldberg, JONAH's co-director, and Alan Downing, a "life coach"
who provides therapy sessions, were also named in the suit.

The plaintiffs include Michael Ferguson, Benjamin Unger, Sheldon Bruck
and Chaim Levin, all of whom used the services of JONAH when they were
in their teens or young 20s.

Two of the men's mothers, Jo Bruck and Bella Levin, who paid for therapy
sessions that could cost up to $10,000 a year, were also plaintiffs.

One of the plaintiffs alleges that therapy sessions that involved a
virtual "strip tease" in front of an older male counselor, as well as
reliving abuse and homophobia were "humiliating."

They are seeking declaratory, injunctive and an undisclosed amount of
monetary relief, as well as court costs, according to the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs have received legal help from the Southern Poverty Law
Center (SPLC), which claims in the lawsuit that conversion therapy is a
dangerous practice that has been "discredited or highly criticized" by
every major American medical, psychiatric, psychological and
professional organization.

Three of the young plaintiffs are from an ultra orthodox Jewish
background; Ferguson came from a Mormon background and met Downing at a
"Journey Into Manhood" retreat, according to the lawsuit.

JONAH appears to cater to orthodox Jews, but its methods "do not have a
strong religious aspect," according to SPLC lawyer Sam Wolfe.

The lawsuit alleges that some of the methods used included: telling boys
to beat a pillow, the "effigy of the client's mother," with a tennis
racket; encouraging "cuddling" between younger clients and older male
counselors; and even instructing attendees to remove their clothing and
hold their penis in front of Downing.

Attendees were also subjected to ridicule as "faggots" and "homos" in
mock locker room and gym class role playing, according to the lawsuit.

"It's definitely cruel and unusual and doesn't work," said Wolfe. "They
are peddling bogus techniques that have no foundation in science and are
basically ridiculous and even harmful."

Wolfe paraphrased JONAH's message as: "All you have to do is put in the
work to overcome your sexual attractions. If you follow our program your
true orientation emerges and will turn you into a straight person."

"Often if what the conversion therapist tells them doesn't work, it's their fault," Wolfe added.

In 2008, when the plaintiffs were seeking help from JONAH, the cost of
an individual therapy session was $100 and for a group session, $60.
JONAH also "strongly pushed" attending weekend retreats that could cost
as much as $700, said Wolfe.

Arthur Goldberg said he "knows nothing about the lawsuit," which was
filed this morning, and referred ABCNews.com to JONAH's website.

"We have a lot of people who were a success and were healed," he said of
JONAH's 14 years in service. "Hundreds of the clients we serve are
satisfied ... Our therapy is very conventional."

When asked about the group's practices, he said, "I can't tell you about
the methodology." Goldberg admitted he had "no background specifically
in counseling."

"I am the administrator," he said. "I used to teach family law."

When asked about instructing boys to take off their clothes, he said, "I know nothing about that."

Goldberg also said he had "no idea" how to reach Downing because he was an "independent contractor."

According to JONAH's mission statement
on its website, the nonprofit group is "dedicated to educating the
world-wide Jewish community about the social, cultural and emotional
factors which lead to same-sex attractions."

JONAH's Goldberg, who runs the business side of the nonprofit, says on
the website that "change from homosexual to heterosexual is possible …
homosexuality is a learned behavior which can be unlearned, and that
healing is a lifelong process."

According to the lawsuit, JONAH cites the "scientific" work of Joseph
Nicolosi, one of the primary proponents of conversion therapy and
Richard A. Cohen, who was permanently expelled from the American
Counseling Association in 2002 for "multiple ethical violations."

Nicolosi's methodology is based on the belief that a weak father-son
relationship and a dominating mother contribute to homosexuality. He
advocates "rough and tumble games," as well as father-son showers,
according to the lawsuit.

Cohen uses a technique called "bioenergetics" that includes having male
patients beat a pillow, which represents their mother, as a way of
stopping same-sex attraction, according to the lawsuit.

Conversion therapists also cite child abuse and bullying as a "primary cause" of homosexuality, according to the lawsuit.

Jersey City, NJ - Four gay men accused a New Jersey organization of
fraud Tuesday for selling “conversion therapy” with false promises to
make them straight.

Chaim Levin, left, and Michael Ferguson, right, with his partner
Seth Anderson, listen to a a news conference, in New York, Tuesday,
Nov. 27, 2012. Levin, of the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn. NY,
and Ferguson, of Salt Lake City, are two of four gay men accusing a New
Jersey organization of selling "conversion therapy" services promising
to make them straight. Instead, they told the news conference that they
were subjected to humiliations, including having to strip naked, or
taking a baseball bat to effigies of their mothers. (AP Photo/Richard
Drew)

They said during a Manhattan news conference that they were subjected
to humiliations that included stripping naked and taking a baseball bat
to effigies of their mothers.

The four attended sessions at the Jersey City, N.J.-based Jews
Offering New Alternatives to Healing, or JONAH. The nonprofit advertises
in Jewish publications and claims to rid men of same-sex attractions.

Three of the men are Jewish — Chaim Levin, Benjamin Unger, and
Sheldon Bruck. The fourth, Michael Ferguson, is a Mormon now living in
Salt Lake City who was a college student in New York when he signed up
for the services.

The men say in a lawsuit that the methods do not work and should not
be marketed under New Jersey’s consumer protection laws. They say the
suit was filed Tuesday in New Jersey, but officials there could not
confirm receiving it.

The men say in the suit that JONAH’s practices included telling them
“that gay sexual orientation is a mental disorder and gay people must
change to straight in order to lead satisfying and happy lives” and
“that when conversion therapy does not produce the promised results, the
clients themselves are to blame for not sufficiently investing in and
surrendering to Defendants’ services.”

JONAH did not return calls requesting comment.

The group’s mission statement on its website says JONAH is “dedicated
to educating the world-wide Jewish community about the social, cultural
and emotional factors which lead to same-sex attractions.”

Its claim that being gay is a mental disorder that can be reversed has been rejected by the American Psychiatric Association.

Speaking for the men at Tuesday’s news conference were attorneys from
the Southern Poverty Law Center, a Montgomery, Ala.-based civil rights
organization.

“JONAH profits off of shameful and dangerous attempts to fix
something that isn’t broken,” said Christine P. Sun, the center’s deputy
legal director. “Despite the consensus of mainstream professional
organizations that conversion therapy doesn’t work, this racket
continues to scam vulnerable gay men and lesbians out of thousands of
dollars and inflicts significant harm on them.”

California has taken action against providers of conversion therapy.

Last month, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill that prohibits
licensed mental health professionals from using so-called reparative or
conversion therapies with clients under age 18. Brown called the
therapies “quackery” that “have no basis in science or medicine.”

**WARNING: The details in the following story are graphic and may be considered disturbing by some readers.

(CNN) — Before Sheldon Bruck told his orthodox Jewish parents he was gay, the teenager looked for a way out of homosexuality.

His search led him to JONAH — Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing — which claimed on its website to help people “struggling with unwanted same-sex sexual attractions.”

JONAH co-director Arthur Goldberg promised Bruck, then 17, that “JONAH could help him change his orientation from gay to straight,” according to a consumer fraud lawsuit filed Tuesday against JONAH, Goldberg and a JONAH counselor.

“This is the first time that plaintiffs have sought to hold conversion therapists liable in a court of law,” said Samuel Wolfe, a lawyer with the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The defendants did not respond to CNN calls and e-mails for comment on the lawsuit, which was filed Tuesday in Hudson County, New Jersey, Superior Court. A page on the organization’s website touts success stories from the program with letters from past participants and their family members.

Bruck and three male plaintiffs contend they were defrauded by JONAH’s claim that “being gay is a mental disorder” that could be reversed by conversion therapy — “a position rejected by the American Psychiatric Association four decades ago,” the lawsuit said.

The therapy put them at risk of “depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior,” while giving them no benefits, the suit said.

Jo Bruck, Sheldon’s mother, and Bella Levin, the mother of plaintiff Chaim Levin, are also plaintiffs because they paid for their sons’ conversion therapy and the counseling the suit said they needed to recover from it.

The conversion therapy techniques included having them strip naked in group sessions, cuddling and intimate holding of others of the same-sex, violently beating an effigy of their mothers with a tennis racket, visiting bath houses “in order to be nude with father figures,” and being “subjected to ridicule as ‘faggots’ and ‘homos’ in mock locker room scenarios,” the suit said.

“As long as you put in the effort, you’re going to change,” Goldberg told Bruck in the summer of 2009, the lawsuit said.

JONAH counselor Thaddeus Heffner blamed Bruck’s gay orientation “on Bruck for not working hard enough to change, on his father for being too distant, and on his mother for being too close to him,” the suit said.

Bruck quit after five sessions, delivered through an online video link, because he “experienced deepening depression and anxiety leading to suicidal ideation and feelings of hopelessness about his life,” the suit said.

Heffner angrily warned Bruck that he was “making a big mistake” and “throwing (his) life away” by “giving into (his) desires” and that he would “never lead a happy life,” but would “lead a life of unhappiness in that unhealthy lifestyle,” the suit said.

Chaim Levin, also an orthodox Jew, was about to turn 17 in 2007 when he talked to his parents about his sexual orientation and sexual abuse when he was younger. A rabbi in his Brooklyn, New York, community suggested to his parents that they enroll him in JONAH’s program.

“You can change if you just try hard enough,” the suit said Goldberg told him. “You just need to work really hard, we are experts at this. We have helped so many people.”

Levin attended weekly sessions for 18 months at JONAH’s Jersey City, New Jersey, headquarters conducted by Alan Downing, an unlicensed JONAH counselor who calls himself a “life coach,” the suit said. Downing is named as a defendant in the case.

The lawsuit described what happened in one of those sessions in October 2008 with Levin, who was 18 at the time.

“Downing initiated a discussion about Levin’s body and instructed Levin to stand in front of a full-length mirror and hold a staff,” the suit said. “Downing directed Levin to say one negative thing about himself, remove an article of clothing, then repeat the process. Although Levin protested and expressed discomfort, at Downing’s insistence, Levin submitted and continued until he was fully naked. Downing then instructed Levin to touch his penis and then his buttocks. Levin, unsure what to do but trusting in and relying on Downing, followed the instructions, upon which Downing said ‘good’ and the session ended.”

Two other plaintiffs — Benjamin Unger and Michael Ferguson — described similar incidents in the suit.

“On one occasion, Downing instructed Unger to beat an effigy of his mother with a tennis racket, as though killing her, and encouraged Unger to scream at his mother while beating her effigy,” the suit said.

“Conversion therapy was, in Unger’s experience, ‘psychological abuse,’” it said. “By the time he terminated sessions with JONAH, he was deeply depressed and had commenced taking antidepressant medications.”

Downing “picked apart every human emotion and childhood disappointment” of Unger, to present them as treatable origins of Unger’s orientation, the suit said.

Unger’s ability to have physical and emotional relationships with men was impaired and he was unable to work for a year, the suit said.

Bruck, Levin, Unger and Ferguson are “adjusting well” four years after their last conversion therapy treatments, according to Wolfe. “They have had time to get on with their lives,” he said.

Their lawsuit should put all conversion therapists on notice that they can be held accountable, Wolfe said.

“We really want to bring this lawsuit to bring attention to this practice that takes place in many parts of the country, praying on vulnerable young people,” Wolfe said.

Gay “conversion therapy,” which claims to help men overcome unwanted
same-sex attractions but has been widely attacked as unscientific and
harmful, is facing its first tests in the courtroom.

Chaim Levin

Chaim Levin, a plaintiff in a lawsuit being filed in
New Jersey against therapists that claim to make homosexual men
heterosexual.

Michael Ferguson, 30, who sought help from therapists in 2008, is another plaintiff in the lawsuit.

In New Jersey on Tuesday, four gay men who tried the therapy filed a
civil suit against a prominent counseling group, charging it with
deceptive practices under the state’s Consumer Fraud Act.

The former clients said they were emotionally scarred by false promises
of inner transformation and humiliating techniques that included
stripping naked in front of the counselor and beating effigies of their
mothers. They paid thousands of dollars in fees over time, they said,
only to be told that the lack of change in their sexual feelings was
their own fault.

In California, so-called ex-gay therapists have gone to court to argue
for the other side. They are seeking to block a new state law, signed by
Gov. Jerry Brown in September and celebrated as a milestone by
advocates for gay rights, that bans conversion therapy for minors.

In Sacramento on Friday, a federal judge will hear the first of two
legal challenges brought by conservative law groups claiming that the
ban is an unconstitutional infringement on speech, religion and privacy.

Since the 1970s, when mainstream mental health
associations stopped branding homosexuality as a disorder, a small
network of renegade therapists, conservative religious leaders and
self-identified “life coaches” has continued to argue that it is not
inborn, but an aberration rooted in childhood trauma. Homosexuality is
caused, these therapists say, by a stifling of normal masculine
development, often by distant fathers and overbearing mothers or by
early sexual abuse.

An industry of “reparative therapy” clinics and men’s weekend retreats
has drawn thousands of teenagers and adults who hope to rid themselves
of homosexual urges, whether because of religious beliefs or family
pressures.

But leading scientific and medical groups say that the theories of
sexuality are unfounded and that there is no evidence that core sexual
urges can be changed. They also warn that the therapy can, in the words
of the American Psychiatric Association, cause “depression, anxiety and
self-destructive behavior” and “reinforce self-hatred already
experienced by the patient.”

Those conclusions will be at the center of the coming legal fights in the state and federal courts.

In the spotlight in New Jersey are a counseling center called Jews
Offering New Alternatives for Healing, or Jonah; its co-founder Arthur
Goldberg; and an affiliated “life coach,” Alan Downing.

Mr. Goldberg helped found Jonah in 1999, after he finished serving a
prison sentence and probation for financial fraud he committed in the
1980s. The group describes itself as “dedicated to educating the
worldwide Jewish community about the social, cultural and emotional
factors that lead to same-sex attractions,” and says it “works directly
with those struggling with unwanted same-sex attractions,” including
non-Jews.

While many Orthodox Jews consider homosexual relations to be a violation
of divine law, Mr. Goldberg’s group has no official standing within
Judaism, and many Jews accept homosexuality.

Neither Mr. Goldberg nor Mr. Downing is licensed as a therapist, so they
are not subject to censure by professional associations.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a rights group based in Montgomery,
Ala., is bringing the suit on behalf of four former patients and two of
their mothers, who say they paid thousands of dollars not only for
useless therapy for their sons but also for more counseling to undo the
damage.

“The defendants peddled antigay pseudoscience, defaming gay people as
loathsome and deranged,” said Sam Wolfe, a lawyer with the group.

The suit, filed in Superior Court in Hudson County, calls for monetary compensation and for a shutdown of Jonah.

Mr. Goldberg and Mr. Downing did not respond to telephone and e-mail requests for comment.

________________________________________________________________

Gay men sue counselors who promised to make them straight

By Alan Duke

CNN - November 27, 2012

Before Sheldon Bruck told his orthodox Jewish parents he was gay, the teenager looked for a way out of homosexuality.

His search led him to JONAH -- Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing -- which claimed on its website to help people "struggling with unwanted same-sex sexual attractions."

JONAH co-director Arthur Goldberg promised Bruck, then 17, that "JONAH could help him change his orientation from gay to straight," according to a consumer fraud lawsuit filed Tuesday against JONAH, Goldberg and a JONAH counselor.

"This is the first time that plaintiffs have sought to hold conversion therapists liable in a court of law," said Samuel Wolfe, a lawyer with the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The defendants did not respond to CNN calls and e-mails for comment on the lawsuit, which was filed in Hudson County, New Jersey, Superior Court. A page on the organization's website touts success stories from the program with letters from past participants and their family members.

Bruck and three male plaintiffs contend they were defrauded by JONAH's claim that "being gay is a mental disorder" that could be reversed by conversion therapy -- "a position rejected by the American Psychiatric Association four decades ago," the lawsuit said.

The therapy, which can cost up to $10,000 a year, put them at risk of "depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior," while giving them no benefits, the suit said.

Jo Bruck, Sheldon's mother, and Bella Levin, the mother of plaintiff Chaim Levin, are also plaintiffs because they paid for their sons' conversion therapy and the counseling the suit said they needed to recover from it.

The conversion therapy techniques included having them strip naked in group sessions, cuddling and intimate holding of others of the same-sex, violently beating an effigy of their mothers with a tennis racket, visiting bath houses "in order to be nude with father figures," and being "subjected to ridicule as 'faggots' and 'homos' in mock locker room scenarios," the suit said.

"As long as you put in the effort, you're going to change," Goldberg told Bruck in the summer of 2009, the lawsuit said.

JONAH counselor Thaddeus Heffner blamed Bruck's gay orientation "on Bruck for not working hard enough to change, on his father for being too distant, and on his mother for being too close to him," the suit said.

Bruck quit after five sessions, delivered through an online video link, because he "experienced deepening depression and anxiety leading to suicidal ideation and feelings of hopelessness about his life," the suit said.

Heffner angrily warned Bruck that he was "making a big mistake" and "throwing (his) life away" by "giving into (his) desires" and that he would "never lead a happy life," but would "lead a life of unhappiness in that unhealthy lifestyle," the suit said.

Chaim Levin, also an orthodox Jew, was about to turn 17 in 2007 when he talked to his parents about his sexual orientation and sexual abuse when he was younger. A rabbi in his Brooklyn, New York, community suggested to his parents that they enroll him in JONAH's program.

"You can change if you just try hard enough," the suit said Goldberg told him. "You just need to work really hard, we are experts at this. We have helped so many people."

Levin attended weekly sessions for 18 months at JONAH's Jersey City, New Jersey, headquarters conducted by Alan Downing, an unlicensed JONAH counselor who calls himself a "life coach," the suit said. Downing is named as a defendant in the case.

"I was manipulated into believing that I could change my sexual orientation, but instead I was subjected to terrible abuse that mirrored the traumatic assault that I experienced as a young person," Levin said at a news conference Tuesday. " What I can tell you is that conversion therapy does not work. My family and I have wasted thousands of dollars and many hours on this scam."

The lawsuit described what happened in one of those sessions in October 2008 with Levin, who was 18 at the time.

"Downing initiated a discussion about Levin's body and instructed Levin to stand in front of a full-length mirror and hold a staff," the suit said. "Downing directed Levin to say one negative thing about himself, remove an article of clothing, then repeat the process. Although Levin protested and expressed discomfort, at Downing's insistence, Levin submitted and continued until he was fully naked. Downing then instructed Levin to touch his penis and then his buttocks. Levin, unsure what to do but trusting in and relying on Downing, followed the instructions, upon which Downing said 'good' and the session ended."

Two other plaintiffs -- Benjamin Unger and Michael Ferguson -- described similar incidents in the suit.

"On one occasion, Downing instructed Unger to beat an effigy of his mother with a tennis racket, as though killing her, and encouraged Unger to scream at his mother while beating her effigy," the suit said.

"Conversion therapy was, in Unger's experience, 'psychological abuse,'" it said. "By the time he terminated sessions with JONAH, he was deeply depressed and had commenced taking antidepressant medications."

Downing "picked apart every human emotion and childhood disappointment" of Unger, to present them as treatable origins of Unger's orientation, the suit said.

"I watched as grown men were frenzied into fits of emotional rage against their mothers and encouraged to act out physical violence against their parents in order to access their so-called true manhood and become more heterosexual," Ferguson told reporters Tuesday.

Unger's ability to have physical and emotional relationships with men was impaired and he was unable to work for a year, the suit said.

Bruck, Levin, Unger and Ferguson are "adjusting well" four years after their last conversion therapy treatments, according to Wolfe. "They have had time to get on with their lives," he said.

Their lawsuit should put all conversion therapists on notice that they can be held accountable, Wolfe said.

The SPLC has identified 70 conversion therapy providers across the United States. A California law signed by Gov. Jerry Brown last month made it illegal for licensed counselors to use the therapy with clients under 18.

"We really want to bring this lawsuit to bring attention to this practice that takes place in many parts of the country, preying on vulnerable young people," Wolfe said.

Opinion: Oops, I left my sexual orientation at home

________________________________________________________________

New Jersey conversion therapist vows to keep going in the face of lawsuit

By Christian Dem in NC

Daily KOS - November 29, 2012

On Tuesday, Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing (JONAH), a Jersey City-based conversion therapy that supposedly claims it can turn gay people straight, was slapped with a first-of-its-kind lawsuit from the Southern Poverty Law Center and four former patients alleging they were defrauded. Well, today JONAH announced that it's going to keep going as before.

JONAH co-director Arthur Goldberg said the position that people's sexual orientation can be changed by therapy is not contradicted by the latest statements from the American Psychiatric Association, but he did not give any examples.

"We remain steadfast in our commitment to assist those with unwanted same-sex attractions," Goldberg said in a statement to CNN Thursday. "There are thousands of people who have shed their unwanted same-sex attractions, not only through our programs, but also through other similar programs."

In a statement, JONAH calls the suit groundless and a threat to free speech. Goldberg himself doubled down on this when he made the rounds of religious right talk radio today. On AFA Today, Goldberg claimed that suing him is the same as suing Weight Watchers for not losing weight through its program.

However, that comparison doesn't hold water when you look at some of the shocking things that the four plaintiffs say went on at JONAH sessions. Among them:

The conversion therapy techniques described in the suit included having them strip naked in group sessions, cuddling and intimate holding of others of the same sex, violently beating an effigy of their mothers with a tennis racket, visiting bath houses "in order to be nude with father figures," and being "subjected to ridicule as 'faggots' and 'homos' in mock locker room scenarios."

It gets even worse--read the complaint here if you have a strong enough stomach. And these guys have the nerve to say that this is a First Amendment issue? I find it hard to believe any fair-minded person, regardless of where they stand on gay rights, would find these practices acceptable.

Among some of the more chilling revelations:

One of the plaintiffs, Chaim Levin, was told to strip naked in front of counselor Alan Downing, then to touch his penis and buttocks.

Another plaintiff, Benjamin Unger, was told to beat an effigy of his mother with a tennis racket and scream at it. Supposedly, his mother was responsible for making him gay.

Another plaintiff, Sheldon Bruck, was told that by reliving and magnifying hurtful experiences from his past, he'd become straight. He was also told that he became gay as a result of his mother being too close to him. Bruck was so traumatized by this "therapy" that he seriously thought about suicide.

If I'm the SPLC and the plaintiffs, after reading this I'm seriously thinking about seeking an injunction. I'm no lawyer, but there's enough evidence of potentially irreparable harm if this is allowed to go on that it wouldn't be out of line for a judge to rein them in.

________________________________________________________________

Rep. Speier introduces resolution condemning ‘conversion’ therapy

By Lou Chibbaro Jr.

Washington Blade -November 28, 2012

Sheldon Bruck, who is gay, said he is a survivor of conversion therapy. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) introduced a resolution into the
House of Representatives on Wednesday declaring that efforts by mental
health practitioners to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender
identity or expression are “dangerous and harmful.”

“It is the sense of Congress that sexual orientation and gender
identity or expression change efforts directed at minors are discredited
and ineffective, have no legitimate therapeutic purpose, and are
dangerous and harmful,” the resolution states.

“Congress encourages each state to take steps to protect minors from
efforts that promote or promise to change sexual orientation or gender
identity or expression, based on the premise that homosexuality or
transgender identity is a mental illness or developmental disorder that
can or should be cured,” the resolution states.

Speier introduced her non-binding resolution one
day after the Southern Poverty Law Center filed a lawsuit in New Jersey
on behalf of four gay men and two parents against a New Jersey based
counseling group that performs conversion therapy. The lawsuit
charges Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing (JONAH) with
committing consumer fraud by falsely claiming the gay men could change
their sexual orientation from gay to straight.

“Let’s get this straight,” Speier said at Capitol Hill news
conference called to announce the introduction of her resolution. “Being
gay, lesbian, transgender is not a disease that can be cured or a
mental health issue that can be treated. Sadly, not everyone gets this,”
she said.

“A quick Internet search will bring up some 80 practitioners and
groups that promise to help individuals to become heterosexual,” she
told the news conference. “Gay conversion has become a multimillion
dollar industry.”

Speier said she and her staff were investigating whether some of
these practitioners and organizations, most of whom are unlicensed, were
being paid to perform conversion therapy on patients who pay them
through federal programs such as Medicaid or TRICARE, a federal medical
program that assists military veterans.

“In my cursory investigation, I have found two additional instances
of so-called mental health professionals that advertise these services
and appear to be eligible for federal dollars,” she said. “This morning,
I sent letters of inquiry to Medicaid and TRICARE to determine if these
instances reflect systemic weaknesses that allow federal taxpayer
dollars to go to harmful, illegitimate medical services.”

Also speaking at the news conference were Sheldon Bruck and Jerry
Spencer, who described themselves as gay men and survivors of conversion
therapy. Bruck and his mother are among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit
filed on t heir behalf by the Southern Poverty Law Center against the
New Jersey based JONAH group.

Spencer, 23, said his conservative Catholic parents pressured him
into undergoing conversion therapy when he was 14 and the therapy lasted
more than five years before he chose to end it.

“It was all a scam,” he said. But before he came to that realization,
the therapy resulted in “deep emotional scars” both for him and his
family.

“I’m telling my story to help others,” he said. “This industry preys on gay people and their families.”

Speier’s office said Reps. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) and David Cicilline
(D-R.I.) signed on as co-sponsors for the resolution. Speier said she
couldn’t immediately determine which House committee would be assigned
to consider the resolution. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who is gay, has
said he doesn’t expect the Republican-controlled House will pass any
LGBT supportive bills or resolutions over the next two years.

Representatives of the Human Rights Campaign, Southern Poverty Law
Center, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights also spoke at the
news conference.

________________________________________________________________

Rabbinical Council of America (RCA) denounces reparative therapy

Rabbinical Council of America - November 29, 2012

The following will be released later on today

Rabbinical Council of America's Statement Regarding JONAH (Jews Offering New

Alternatives to Homosexuality)

In the years since the Rabbinical Council of America's first comment
about JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality), "the only
Jewish based organization dedicated to assisting individuals with
unwanted same sex attractions move from gay to straight" in January,
2004, in which we suggested that rabbis might refer congregants to them
for reparative therapy, many concerns about JONAH and reparative therapy
have been raised.

As rabbis trained in Jewish law and values,
we base our religious positions regarding medical matters on the best
research and advice of experts and scholars in those areas, along with
concern for the religious, emotional, and physical welfare of those
impacted by our decisions. Our responsibility is to apply halakhic
(Jewish legal) values to those opinions.

Based on consultation
with a wide range of mental health experts and therapists who informed
us of the lack of scientifically rigorous studies that support the
effectiveness of therapies to change sexual orientation, a review of
literature written by experts and major medical and mental health
organizations, and based upon reports of the negative and, at times,
deleterious consequences to clients of some of the interventions
endorsed by JONAH, the Rabbinical Council of America decided in 2011, as
part of an overall statement on the Jewish attitude towards
homosexuality, to withdraw its original letter referencing JONAH.
Despite numerous attempts by the RCA to have mention of that original
letter removed from the JONAH website, our calls, letters, and emails
remain unanswered. As Rabbi Shmuel Goldin, president of the RCA, stated
in 2011, "We want it taken down. JONAH said it was a letter of support,
but if you read the letter it is not. They took an informational
statement and reprinted it, and the use of that as an endorsement is an
error."

We believe that properly trained mental health
professionals who abide bythe values and ethics of their professions can
and do make a difference in the lives of their patients and clients.
The RCA believes that responsible therapists, in partnership with
amenable clients, should be able to work on

whatever issues those
clients voluntarily bring to their session. Allegations made against
JONAH lead us to question whether JONAH meets those standards.

Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm, Chancellor of Yeshiva University and author of
the 1974 Encyclopedia Judaica Year Book article, "Judaism and the Modern
Attitude to Homosexuality," the first contemporary article to address
the issue from the perspective of Jewish law and philosophy, had
originally commended the work of JONAH. In response to the negative
reports about JONAH's activities and concerns expressed to him by
respected mental health professionals, Dr. Lamm withdrew his endorsement
of JONAH.

212-807-9000

(CNN) -- The conversion therapy center being sued by
gay men who paid the counselors to make them straight vowed it would
continue to "assist those with unwanted same-sex attractions."

"The lawsuit is without
merit, and is designed to create a chilling effect upon speech and
programs that assist people in overcoming unwanted same-sex
attractions," a statement from JONAH -- Jews Offering New Alternatives
for Healing -- said Thursday.

Four former JONAH clients, who were teens when they signed up for help, filed a consumer fraud lawsuit
against JONAH and two of its counselors Tuesday, saying they were
defrauded by JONAH's claim that "being gay is a mental disorder" that
could be reversed by conversion therapy -- "a position rejected by the
American Psychiatric Association four decades ago," the lawsuit said.

"This is the first time
that plaintiffs have sought to hold conversion therapists liable in a
court of law," said Samuel Wolfe, a lawyer with the Southern Poverty Law
Center. The SPLC, an Alabama-based civil rights group, is providing
legal aid to the plaintiffs.

Their lawsuit should put all conversion therapists on notice that they can be held accountable, Wolfe said.

The SPLC has identified
70 conversion therapy providers across the United States. A California
law signed by Gov. Jerry Brown last month made it illegal for licensed counselors to use the therapy with clients under 18.

JONAH co-director Arthur
Goldberg said the position that people's sexual orientation can be
changed by therapy is not contradicted by the latest statements from the
American Psychiatric Association, but he did not give any examples.

"We remain steadfast in
our commitment to assist those with unwanted same-sex attractions,"
Goldberg said in a statement to CNN Thursday. "There are thousands of
people who have shed their unwanted same-sex attractions, not only
through our programs, but also through other similar programs."

In an interview Thursday
with the Family Research Council's Washington Watch Radio, Goldberg said
he was optimistic that JONAH has "a very strong case and we should be
able to emerge victorious."

Outlawing gay conversion therapy

The lawsuit, filed in
Hudson County, New Jersey, Superior Court, said conversion therapy,
which can cost up to $10,000 a year, can put patients at risk of
"depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior," while giving them
no benefits.

Plaintiff Sheldon Bruck
was 17 when he sought Goldberg's help in 2009. He wanted to assure his
orthodox Jewish parents there was a way out of homosexuality when he
told them he was gay.

Goldberg promised Bruck that "JONAH could help him change his orientation from gay to straight," the suit said.

Jo Bruck, Sheldon's
mother, and Bella Levin, the mother of plaintiff Chaim Levin, are also
plaintiffs because they paid for their sons' conversion therapy and the
counseling the suit said they needed to recover from it.

The conversion therapy
techniques described in the suit included having them strip naked in
group sessions, cuddling and intimate holding of others of the same sex,
violently beating an effigy of their mothers with a tennis racket,
visiting bath houses "in order to be nude with father figures," and
being "subjected to ridicule as 'faggots' and 'homos' in mock locker
room scenarios."

"As long as you put in the effort, you're going to change," Goldberg told Bruck, the lawsuit said.

JONAH counselor Thaddeus
Heffner blamed Bruck's gay orientation "on Bruck for not working hard
enough to change, on his father for being too distant, and on his mother
for being too close to him," the suit said.

Bruck quit after five
sessions, delivered through an online video link, because he
"experienced deepening depression and anxiety leading to suicidal
ideation and feelings of hopelessness about his life," the suit said.

Heffner angrily warned
Bruck that he was "making a big mistake" and "throwing (his) life away"
by "giving into (his) desires" and that he would "never lead a happy
life," but would "lead a life of unhappiness in that unhealthy
lifestyle," the suit said.

Chaim Levin, also an
orthodox Jew, was about to turn 17 in 2007 when he talked to his parents
about his sexual orientation and sexual abuse when he was younger. A
rabbi in his Brooklyn, New York, community suggested to his parents that
they enroll him in JONAH's program.

"You can change if you
just try hard enough," the suit said Goldberg told him. "You just need
to work really hard, we are experts at this. We have helped so many
people."

Levin attended weekly
sessions for 18 months at JONAH's Jersey City, New Jersey, headquarters
conducted by Alan Downing, an unlicensed JONAH counselor who calls
himself a "life coach," the suit said. Downing is named as a defendant
in the case.

"I was manipulated into
believing that I could change my sexual orientation, but instead I was
subjected to terrible abuse that mirrored the traumatic assault that I
experienced as a young person," Levin said at a news conference Tuesday.
"What I can tell you is that conversion therapy does not work. My
family and I have wasted thousands of dollars and many hours on this
scam."

The lawsuit described what happened in one of those sessions in October 2008 with Levin, who was 18 at the time.

"Downing initiated a
discussion about Levin's body and instructed Levin to stand in front of a
full-length mirror and hold a staff," the suit said. "Downing directed
Levin to say one negative thing about himself, remove an article of
clothing, then repeat the process. Although Levin protested and
expressed discomfort, at Downing's insistence, Levin submitted and
continued until he was fully naked. Downing then instructed Levin to
touch his penis and then his buttocks. Levin, unsure what to do but
trusting in and relying on Downing, followed the instructions, upon
which Downing said 'good' and the session ended."

Two other plaintiffs -- Benjamin Unger and Michael Ferguson -- described similar incidents in the suit.

"On one occasion,
Downing instructed Unger to beat an effigy of his mother with a tennis
racket, as though killing her, and encouraged Unger to scream at his
mother while beating her effigy," the suit said.

"Conversion therapy was,
in Unger's experience, 'psychological abuse,'" it said. "By the time he
terminated sessions with JONAH, he was deeply depressed and had
commenced taking antidepressant medications."

Downing "picked apart
every human emotion and childhood disappointment" of Unger, to present
them as treatable origins of Unger's orientation, the suit said.

"I watched as grown men
were frenzied into fits of emotional rage against their mothers and
encouraged to act out physical violence against their parents in order
to access their so-called true manhood and become more heterosexual,"
Ferguson told reporters Tuesday.

Unger's ability to have
physical and emotional relationships with men was impaired and he was
unable to work for a year, the suit said.

Bruck, Levin, Unger and
Ferguson are "adjusting well" four years after their last conversion
therapy treatments, according to Wolfe. "They have had time to get on
with their lives," he said.

Arthur Goldberg Compares his Ex-Gay Therapy Business to Weight Watchers

By Michael Allen

Opposing Views - November 30, 2012

Arthur Goldberg, founder of the ex-gay therapy company Jews
Offering New Alternatives for Healing (JONAH) in Jersey City, New
Jersey, is being sued by several former gay clients [and their mothers] for consumer fraud and failing to turn them straight.

According to the lawsuit, the therapy sessions sometimes involved
patients and counselors undressing, 'cuddling' between young patients
and older male counselors, and patients holding their penises in front
of staff.

Before founding JONAH, Goldberg was convicted on felony charges and
served time in prison for mail fraud and conspiracy, however, now he has
become a hero to the Religious Right, reports Right Wing Watch.org.

While speaking to American Family Association president Tim Wildmon
and Family Research Council head Tony Perkins on the American Family
Association radio show today, Goldberg denied that he defrauded
customers by advertising that his group is able to cure clients of being
gay.

Goldberg defended his company by saying: "If I went to
Weight Watchers and wanted to lose 60 pounds, but didn't lose the weight
at Weight Watchers, does that mean someone should be suing Weight
Watchers?"

Goldberg failed to mention that losing weight via exercise and
calorie control is a scientifically proven method, while ex-gay
reparative therapies are not been supported by the mainstream medical
establishment.

Ex-gay therapists, who attempt to convert people with "unwanted
same-sex attractions" to heterosexuality, are headed to courts across
the country to keep their controversial practices alive.

In California, four so-called "reparative therapy" practitioners and
two families head to court Friday to ask a federal judge to block a
recently-passed California law cracking down on the practice, the Sacramento Bee reports. And in New Jersey, four gay former patients have sued a therapy provider for fraud and deceptive practices, according to CNN.

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill in September that banned
the therapy from being used on minors. But two families who claim their
sons have benefitted from the therapy and two organizations that support
the practice are bringing an injunction against the law, the first of
its kind, in order to delay its Jan. 1. implementation.

The National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality,
one of the plaintiffs in the case, views the law as an intrusion on the
rights of parents and says homosexuality is "primarily developmental in
origin, and it is — to differing degrees — responsive to
psychotherapeutic measures."

In her court filings, California Attorney General Kamala Harris
writes that the law is based on scientific consensus that "homosexuality
is not a disease, condition, or disorder in need of a 'cure.'" Her
statement went on to say that the injunction would subject minors to a
practice that "the state and every major mental health organization in
the country have condemned as an outmoded, ineffective, and potentially
dangerous relic from an era when homosexuality was pathologized and
criminalized," according to the Bee.

In New Jersey, four former clients of Jews Offering New Alternatives
for Healing (JONAH) filed a consumer fraud lawsuit against the group,
saying the therapy wrongfully made them believe that "being gay is a
mental disorder" and did so using methods that caused "depression and
other emotional harm."

"These counselors are skilled at manipulating you into believing just
about anything," said Benjamin Unger, a plaintiff in the case. "During
my time with JONAH, they told me constantly that my mom had made me gay.
I was so convinced that I refused to have any contact with her for
several months, which caused a great deal of damage to our
relationship."

In the complaint,
which they filed through the Southern Poverty Law Center, the
plaintiffs describe many of the controversial "treatments" administered
by JONAH for "re-orientation." The treatments including nude group
therapy sessions, telling patients to beat and verbally assault effigies
of their mothers, as well as recommending patients to shower privately
with their fathers, as well as in public at gyms and bath houses with
other men, to simulate being nude with their fathers.

JONAH maintains that the practice "helps to assess and overcome deep issues" with its patients.

"The lawsuit is without merit, and is designed to create a chilling
effect upon speech and programs that assist people in overcoming
unwanted same-sex attractions," the group said in a statement.

Arthur Goldberg, JONAH's co-director, said in the statement that he
and the organization "remain steadfast in our commitment to assist those
with unwanted same-sex attractions."

The suit aims to revoke JONAH's business license, to place a
permanent injunction against JONAH's staff from practicing ex-gay
therapy, and to recoup the costs of the therapy as well as pay for the
cost of "repairing damage resulting from [JONAH's] unlawful acts."

The American Modern Orthodox community has just entered uncharted territory. Last week, our largest rabbinic organization, the Rabbinical Council of America (RCA) formally withdrew its support of JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality). JONAH has long been the Orthodox community’s address for reparative therapy, a process that is intended to cure people of their homosexual attractions and to replace these with heterosexual ones. The recently announced lawsuits against JONAH brought by four of its former clients, accusing JONAH of both fraud and abusive practices, was apparently the last straw for the RCA.

Strictly speaking, the RCA’s statement rejects only JONAH. It, in fact, goes on to say, “We believe that properly trained mental health professionals who abide by the values and ethics of their professions can and do make a difference in the lives of their patients and clients [and that these professionals] should be able to work on whatever issues [their] clients voluntarily bring to their session.” This is, of course, indisputably correct. But the statement’s acknowledgement of “the lack of scientifically rigorous studies that support the effectiveness of therapies to change sexual orientation” represents a paradigm shift. It is a rejection of the very premise that JONAH and all reparative therapy is built on, namely that sexual orientation is subject to change, and that any client who works hard enough at it can become heterosexual. This may not strike many readers as being a revelation at all. But through this RCA statement, the Modern Orthodox community has formally crossed into a brave, new world.

Any discussion about what the practical implications of this might be needs to be grounded in an understanding — even an appreciation — of the context out of which it emerged. Any of us who grew up in Orthodox institutions in the 1980s or earlier knows firsthand that homosexuality, and, in particular, male homosexuality, was spoken of with disgust and revulsion, and that homosexual slurs were de rigueur. (In our own defense of course, the larger social landscape wasn’t much different.) And even as the campaigns for gay rights and recognition played out over the ensuing decades, Orthodoxy remained largely unmoved and unchanged. There was only one serious grappling with the issue during this period, and that was the essay written by Rabbi Norman Lamm in 1974 which, while utilizing language that is offensive in today’s context, took the unprecedented step of distinguishing between the “sin” and the “sinner,” asserting that while “the act itself remains an abomination, the fact of illness lays upon us the obligation of pastoral compassion, psychological understanding, and social sympathy.”

Though Rabbi Lamm’s words undoubtedly, and with good cause, arouse anger, pain and resentment in many contemporary readers, understanding why he used them is crucial to understanding the true significance and implications of last week’s developments. The “illness” paradigm for explaining homosexuality (which was, indeed, the American Psychological Association’s paradigm as well until 1973, just one year prior) was Rabbi Lamm’s — and Orthodoxy’s — legal and theological lynchpin. Legal in that it provided access to the legal category of “transgression as a result of compulsion,” a category that elicits a more generous judgment. Theological in that it provided a response to the conundrum that God, who is all-knowing, just and kind, could not possibly prohibit that which cannot humanly be resisted. As long as homosexuality was an illness, a person’s failure to resist its temptations need not be ascribed to a Divine failure, but to an unfortunate human one. Needless to say, the “illness” paradigm also led inexorably to the obligation to seek therapeutic intervention. And while the most modern end of the Orthodox spectrum began to eschew reparative therapy some years ago — see, for example, the July 2010 “Statement of Principles on the Place of Jews With a Homosexual Orientation in Our Community” (http://statementofprinciplesnya.blogspot.com/) — the balance continued to insist upon it. (See, for example, the 2011 “Declaration on the Torah Approach to Homosexuality” — www.torahdec.org.)

The statement of the RCA however, quietly, boldly and courageously breaks new ground. In recognizing that there is no evidence that reparative therapy is effective, and that there is, consequently, no obligation to pursue it, our community is acknowledging that homosexuality may very well be simply part of the human condition. Accordingly, we have decided that homosexuals should not any longer have to pay the psychological, emotional and even physical price for our theological comfort. We have effectively designated our theological question as a teyku, one whose answer still needs to be determined. But one that will, meanwhile, not prevent us from seeing the human truths in front of our eyes.

It is not realistic to expect that Orthodoxy will some day recognize homosexual relationships as being equal to heterosexual ones, or to authorize gay marriage, or even to drop the idea that gay sex is a transgression of biblical law. Orthodoxy’s foundational beliefs concerning the Divinity of Torah and the authority of halachah (received Jewish law) preclude such developments. In other words, if the Torah declares a particular action prohibited, it’s not within our authority to say otherwise. But we can regard homosexual acts as we do other forms of nonobservance, as we do, for example, the nonobservance of kashrut, both in the sense that it doesn’t carry the charge of immorality and also in the sense that it doesn’t harm our ability to have a normal familial relationship with someone. The shift from Rabbi Lamm’s “sympathy” to the RCA’s recognition of the reality of sexual orientation can and should bring us to a place in which we can accept our friends and children and siblings for who they are, grant them the dignity and respect that any person deserves, and love them as our own.

Within our community, it’s a brave, new and better world.

Yosef Kanefsky is senior rabbi at B’nai David-Judea (bnaidavid.com), a Modern Orthodox congregation in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood in Los Angeles. _________________________________________________________________________________

JONAH Exploits Lonely Old Gay Man In New Propaganda Video

Youtube - September 21, 2012

Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) is run by convicted felon Arthur Abba Goldberg and Elaine Berk. Both have out gay sons, yet they run a Jewish organization to heal people of their gayness? They don't sound like very credible witnesses to change.

In this sad video, you will witness how these con artists exploit a pathetic, lonely, old gay man who has no friends. Of course he doesn't have friends -- because he spent his entire life in the closet having anonymous sex at parks. Had he come out and felt proud of his sexual orientation, he wouldn't be in the sad predicament that he is in.

Is this poster boy the best that JONAH could come up with?

As usual, JONAH traffics in stereotypes, misinformation and outright lies. There is no evidence of a bad childhood or gay kids cowering at home as children. Godlberg and Berk are simply making things up or quoting quacks with no credibility. Nothing they say is backed by any credible medical or mental health organization.

When Berk speaks of the "gay genome" she displays appalling ignorance and twists science to fit her propaganda model. In fact, every credible scientist will tell you that homosexuality is genetically and biologically influenced.

In Part II, the "ex-gay" is sent to the gym by his therapist. This is rich because this is what Gollberg had to say about gay men and the gym:

"By the way, did you notice that a lot of gays who remain in the gay lifestyle also do a lot of body building," said Goldberg. "They will be in the gym a lot trying to build up their pecs...Because they have these body image issues and don't feel they are masculine enough."

So in his propaganda video he sends the guy to the gym? These people lie so much they can't remember what they said the day before. And how about how incredibly stupid they made the heterosexual body builders sound? It was a cartoon of masculinity!

JONAH and reparative therapy is a total joke. This is why it should be banned for minors across the nation. Creeps like Berk and Goldberg pretending to be experts on an issue they know virtually nothing about. This is just Goldberg's latest con and it shows by this amateurish video that confuses stereotypes with science.

Last week, Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing (JONAH), a
group that offers conversion therapy to gays, was sued for fraud in New
Jersey state court.
JONAH’s operator and founder Arthur Goldberg first came to national
attention in February of 2010 when the South Florida Gay News and Truth Wins Out
did a joint investigative report exposing him as a convicted felon and
disbarred attorney who had pled guilty to federal and wire mail fraud
charges in a phony bond scheme.

While Goldberg protested those past deeds were irrelevant to his current business, SFGN
showed the lengths he went to conceal his corrupt acts. The Associated
Press reported this week on the present lawsuits by three plaintiffs
who allege that JONAH has been using discredited conversion therapy
tactics to “cure homosexuals.” They are asking that JONAH’s business
license be revoked for violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act,
seeking cash damages as well.

"This is the first time that plaintiffs have sought to hold
conversion therapists liable in a court of law," said Samuel Wolfe, a
lawyer with the Southern Poverty Law Center, talking to CNN.

Three male plaintiffs contend they were defrauded by JONAH's claim
that "being gay is a mental disorder" that could be reversed by
conversion therapy -- "a position rejected by the American Psychiatric
Association four decades ago," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit also alleges that the methods do not work and shouldn’t
be marketed. JONAH’s Arthur Goldberg replied that the suit is
“meritless”, arguing that it chills his first amendment rights to
freedom of speech. Meanwhile, the pleadings in the litigation accuse
JONAH of utilizing shocking techniques to reach their goal of conversion
therapy.

Specifically, the participants in the program were required to strip
nude during sessions, intimately hold other males, and spend more time
with other nude males in health clubs and bathhouses, "in order to be
nude with father figures." One of the JONAH ‘life coaches’ also named in
the suit, Alan Downing, was also accused of encouraging the plaintiff
to lie naked and touch their penis and buttocks.

The reparative therapy methods used by many of these clinics are so
offensive and discredited that earlier this year California passed a law
banning them for clients under age 18. Governor Jerry Brown went as far
as to call the procedures “quackery.” According to the Southern Poverty
Law Center, there are still about 70 conversion therapists practicing
in 20 states.

JONAH’s leader, Arthur Goldberg, is 72. He did 18 months in federal
prison, starting in 1989, for his fraud conviction. Revealed in the SFGN
expose, the pre-trial report submitted to the court for sentencing
purposes accused him of “conspiratorial fraud of spectacular scope,”
alleging he was “knowingly and willfully dishonest.” Meanwhile, he
stands by his philosophy that all gays “can readapt from their gender
deficiencies” with reparative therapy.

The SFGN expose of JONAH was covered in the national press and can be accessed on our website at http://bit.ly/cm7CfA

Should psychological counselors in New Jersey be allowed to attempt to change the sexual orientation of children?

A bill banning the practice is scheduled for a hearing with the state
Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee on December
17. The issue has already sparked national debate, with socially
conservative professional groups parting ways with larger national
organizations.

The New Jersey Psychological Association supports the measure.
Executive Director Josephine Minardo said a consensus has formed against
the approach.

“All of the major national psychological, psychiatric, and counseling
associations -- including our national organization, the American
Psychological Association -- have found that this kind of therapy is
actually very harmful,” in addition to being ineffective, Minardo said.

This puts the association in the unique position of supporting a bill restricting the therapy that some of its members provide.

“We have just cautioned that we have concerns about legislating
specific types of treatment and we don’t want to it to set a precedent,”
Minardo said.

The bill prohibits counselors from attempting to change children’s
sexual orientation, including efforts to change “behaviors or gender
expressions, or to reduce or eliminate sexual or romantic attractions or
feelings toward a person of the same gender.”

Opponents of the measure include the Jersey City-based Jews Offering New Alternative for Healing, or JONAH.

JONAH founder Arthur Goldberg said legislators don’t understand “both
sides of the equation. There are literally hundreds and hundreds of
people who have successfully changed” their sexual orientation through
therapy, he said.

He also noted that the American College of Pediatricians, a socially conservative organization, supports the therapy.

Goldberg said he hopes that the public becomes better informed about the issue.

“In a free democracy, freedom of speech is a healthy thing,” Goldberg said. “Let’s have a full and fair dialogue.”

Goldberg also noted that U.S. District Court Judge William Schubb
ruled that a similar law in California infringes on the free-speech
rights of counselors, temporarily blocking it.

Taking JONAH to Court

A legal case in New Jersey is also targeting the practice.

In November, Goldberg and JONAH were sued by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The lawsuit maintains that the organization is committing consumer fraud by offering sexual orientation “reparative” therapy.

The suit quotes a warning by the American Psychiatric Association
that the “potential risks of reparative therapy are great, including
depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior, since therapist
alignment with society prejudices against homosexuality may reinforce
self-hatred already experienced by the patient.”

Sweeney said he decided to become a sponsor of the bill because attempts to change sexual orientation are fundamentally wrong.

“You’re being told that something is wrong with you -- that’s not
right,” Sweeney said. “If you love your children, you have to accept
your child for who he or she is.”

Sweeney said counselors who believe they can change people’s sexual
orientation have an outdated view. He expressed concern that parents
would try to force this therapy on their children.

“Kids are under enormous peer pressure to start with and being a kid
and being homosexual, it’s a lot of stress in the school environment to
start with and the one place you look for support is your family,”
Sweeney said.

Goldberg rejected the argument that homosexuality isn’t an
appropriate subject for treatment, despite psychologists arguing for
decades that it isn’t a disorder.

“Is it appropriate to treat people who are overweight” or who have
other conditions that aren’t mental disorders? Goldberg asked.

Mat Staver, president of Liberty Counsel, a national legal
organization opposed to laws prohibiting the practice, said the bill
would interfere with both freedom of speech and the counselor-patient
relationship. His organization provides legal representation to the
American Association of Christian Counselors.

“There is evidence of efficacy,” Staver said, adding: “It is the
parent who has the ability to consult their children and make the
decision in conjunction with their children” whether to pursue
counseling.

Lesniak said he was prompted to support the measure based on the scientific evidence he had read.

“I know that professional organizations have already taken positions
that this type of treatment has no basis in science and that it has
proved to be harmful in cases,” Lesniak said. “The combination of those
two in concert prompted me to ban it for minors. If adults want to make
that choice, go through treatment that has no scientific basis -- that
happens all the time -- but minors don’t have that choice and the best
course is to protect them from a treatment that does not have any
efficacy.”

The Assembly version of the bill has been referred to the Assembly Women and Children Committee.

Lawsuit on reparative therapy shines spotlight on tensions within community over homosexuality. By Helen Chernikoff Jewish Week - December 12, 2012

When Mordechai Levovitz learned that a civil rights organization had
announced a lawsuit against a Jewish counseling center in New Jersey
that claims to “cure” homosexuality, he felt mainly rage. This was
despite the fact that he is co-director of an organization, JQY, that
tries to be a haven for Jews who say they are traumatized by the kind of
treatment the counseling center offers.

The rabbis who promote this so-called reparative therapy are as guilty
as the center itself for ruining the lives of religious gay people, and
even driving some to suicide, he said. But they won’t be brought to
justice in this lifetime, he added.

“It is not the Torah that makes people suicidal, for there are many
commandments that Jews struggle with,” said Levovitz, who was raised and
still identifies as Orthodox. “It is the shame created by the
community. Rabbis … who reinforce this shame make life unbearable. The
blood is on their hands.”

The lawsuit, filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center on Nov. 27,
shines a spotlight on an Orthodox world caught in the grip of a painful
conflict. After the suit was announced, the centrist Orthodox Rabbinical
Council of America further distanced itself from JONAH, the counseling
center. A traditional journal characterized homosexuality as an
abomination. All the while, the individuals whose lives are the subject
of such intense debate are trying to figure out how to be gay and Jewish
in ways that feel true to them.

The 2001 film “Trembling Before G-d,” which followed gay and lesbian
Orthodox Jews and interviewed rabbis and therapists, spurred the
Orthodox world to begin grappling more openly with homosexuality, still
viewed in the most traditional communities as a perversion. The years
since have seen a series of statements and forums, including one at
Yeshiva University in 2009 that focused on the importance of empathy.
Levovitz co-founded JQY about a decade ago.

Nearly a third of the New York metropolitan’s area’s 1.5 million Jews
are Orthodox, according to the population survey released in June by
UJA-Federation of New York.

The lawsuit charges JONAH, formerly known as Jews Offering New
Alternatives for Healing, with fraud for claiming to convert people from
gay to straight. It calls for both JONAH’s closing and monetary
compensation of an as-yet unspecified amount that would include triple
the amounts the plaintiffs paid to JONAH, the cost of therapy undergone
as a result of the experience with JONAH and other items for the four
plaintiffs.

Three of the plaintiffs — Chaim Levin, 23; Benjamin Unger, 25; and
Sheldon Bruck, 20 — are members of JQY. The fourth, Michael Ferguson,
30, comes from a Mormon background, said Sam Wolfe, a Southern Poverty
Law Center lawyer involved with the case. Jo Bruck and Bella Levin,
Sheldon and Chaim’s mothers, are also plaintiffs.

JONAH will be defended by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, a
nonprofit law firm that provides defense services to clients whose
religious liberty and free speech rights have been compromised,
according to a statement from the fund. The SPLC lawsuit seeks to
violate the First Amendment freedoms of speech, religion and
association, said Charles LiMandri, the fund’s president, in the
statement. JONAH, the statement says, has helped clients resolve
unwanted same-sex attractions.

The suit describes individual sessions, which cost a minimum of $100,
and group sessions, which cost $60, in which Jonah’s clients were
instructed to undress; sometimes the counselor was naked as well.
Clients were also urged to blame their parents for making them gay and
to beat effigies of their mothers.

The Southern Poverty Law Center first reached out to JQY members to ask
for their help with a campaign to raise public awareness about and
discredit reparative therapy. Later, the organization asked them to
serve as plaintiffs on the related lawsuit, said Levin. His “It Gets
Better” Internet video about being raised religious and coming out as
gay brought him to the center’s attention.

Levin, who grew up in the Chabad community in Crown Heights, Brooklyn,
sought help at JONAH after he was thrown out of his yeshiva at age 17
for being gay. He complied when his therapist, referred by JONAH, asked
him to touch himself during the therapy, and then quit.

After spending two years trying to become straight, Levin needed three
years — and more therapy — to undo the harm that effort inflicted on his
psyche, he said. He came out about three years ago and is now one of
the Orthodox LGBT world’s most visible spokesmen.

The day after the lawsuit was announced, the rabbis who produce
Dialogue, an Orthodox journal, released an article condemning
homosexuality as a biblical abomination through public websites, like
weebly.com, and the e-mail listserv of the AJOP, or Association for
Jewish Outreach Programs.

“Engaged in an act that is entirely Self-directed, the homosexual is,
in effect, having relations with his own image,” wrote Rabbi Aharon
Feldman, the head of Yeshivas Ner Yisroel in Baltimore, in his article.
“He has taken an act that God intended to be one that is creative and
engenders bonding, and has, instead, created a parodic mirror image of
it that is maximally selfish and self-fulfilling.”

Rabbi Feldman could not be reached for comment on the timing of his
piece’s publication, and his co-editor Rabbi Moses Meiselman, the head
of Toras Moshe in Jerusalem, said in an e-mail that the “entire project
was managed by Rabbi Feldman.”

“The edition of Dialogue was many months in planning and coincided with
ongoing events in general and nothing in particular,” he wrote.

However, two days after the lawsuit was announced, the Rabbinical
Council of America, a professional association of more than 1,000
Orthodox rabbis, issued a statement repudiating JONAH.

The RCA had already tried to retract a 2004 letter featured on JONAH’s
website suggesting rabbis refer their congregants to it, said Rabbi
Shmuel Goldin, the RCA’s president. People who had been hurt by their
experiences with JONAH reached out to the RCA, which in turn consulted
with experts and came to question whether JONAH met its standards for
trained mental therapists who abide by the values and ethics of their
profession.

“The Torah is very clear that this lifestyle is outside the purview of
normative Judaism,” Rabbi Goldin said. “We urge individuals to connect
with the Jewish community and connect with rabbis and deal with those
issues the best they can. We are against any kind of personal prejudice
or acts of violence, God forbid, against any person.”

Orthodox attitudes toward homosexuality are changing in subtle ways,
said Miryam Kabakov, co-director of Eshel, the group founded in 2010
that tries to help gay people stay “frum [observant], happy and
healthy.”

These shifts, she said, are mostly in attitude and in private
interactions between individuals, because a public statement could
result in communal censure or pressure.

Still, views like those of Rabbi Feldman’s are making “Aron,” a New
York-area man in his 30s who was raised “black-hat” Orthodox, question
the fundamentals of Orthodoxy.

He underwent the “typical shidduch process,” going on arranged dates
with a view toward marriage and then divorcing after he told his wife
that he was gay. Today, he is still Orthodox. He has not told any of the
traditional communities he has ties to that he is gay.

Despite his growing frustration with the Orthodox world’s position on
homosexuality, it still doesn’t make sense for him to try to create a
new place for himself altogether, either.

“It doesn’t make sense because of millenia of halachic norms, and
communal norms,” he said. “It doesn’t make sense because I haven’t let
go of the idea that the Torah is divine in origin. I may be angry, but
it’s hard to turn your back on [that world], especially as a pretty
well-educated Jew.”

NEW JERSEY, December 20, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com)
- Charles LiMandri, the president and chief counsel of the Freedom of
Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF) has announced that he has accepted the
role of lead defense counsel for Jews Offering New Alternatives for
Healing (JONAH) in a precedent-setting lawsuit filed by the Southern
Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

JONAH
is a Jewish organization that offers assistance to men and women
seeking to resolve their sexual conflicts, focusing specifically on
unwanted same-sex attractions.

The SPLC filed a lawsuit against JONAH, alleging the group is guilty of “consumer fraud,” because the therapy will fail to change some people’s sexual orientation.

In taking on the case, Charles LiMandri stated, “The SPLC lawsuit is
ill-conceived and legally untenable for multiple reasons. It seeks to
violate the First Amendment freedoms of speech, religion. and
association—not only of JONAH and the other defendants, but also untold
numbers of people in need that stand to benefit from their services.”

“It is the height of intolerance and arrogance for the SPLC to
dictate to individuals who experience unwanted same sex attraction and
who are seeking help, that they are not entitled to receive such help
nor support in a way that respects their personal values,” LiMandri
stated. “JONAH and the other defendants will be vigorously defended
against these baseless claims to protect not only their Constitutional
rights, but also the right of self-determination of all those who wish
to resolve their unwanted same sex attractions.”

LiMandri pointed out that since its founding more than 12 years ago,
JONAH has helped hundreds of people live the lives that they want,
consistent with their personal values.

Arthur Goldberg, JONAH’s co-director, has stated
that his organization will vigorously defend itself against a lawsuit
that he called “without merit,” and “designed to create a chilling
effect upon speech and programs that assist people in overcoming
unwanted same-sex attractions.”

“We remain steadfast in our commitment to assist those with unwanted same-sex attractions,” Goldberg said.
“There are thousands of people who have overcome or significantly
diminished their unwanted same-sex attractions, not only through our
programs, but also through other similar programs.”

“As indicated by the publicity surrounding the event, the lawsuit is
designed to create a chilling effect on people and organizations that
stand for the position that change is possible, a position that is not
contradicted by the APA’s latest statements,” Goldberg said.

JONAH’s mission statement states that “because mankind has been
endowed by our Creator with a free will, everyone has the capacity to
change. Through psychological and spiritual counseling, peer support,
and self-empowerment, JONAH seeks to reunify families, to heal the
wounds surrounding homosexuality, and to provide hope.”

The FCDF noted that JONAH has never been the target of a lawsuit
until now, and this lawsuit is apparently the result of SPLC advertising
in the media for people willing to be named as plaintiffs against
JONAH.

The SPLC has labeled numerous pro-family organizations “hate groups” for failing their moral objections to homosexuality.

ony Perkins of the Family Research Council called
the SPLC’s assertion that reparative therapy is a fraud, because not
everyone is “cured, equally “as ridiculous as suing Weight Watchers
because they promised you’d lose weight and you didn’t.”

“The only people guilty of fraud are the ones who claim people with same-sex attractions can’t change,” he said.

Mr. LiMandri indicated that the FCDF is teaming up with the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF)
to litigate the case, which was filed in New Jersey, with the
assistance of Michael Laffey, a highly respected New Jersey attorney who
is experienced in freedom of speech and religious liberty cases.

The FCDF is a national
public interest law firm that specializes in defending freedom of
religion and conscience by providing legal services at the trial level.

Former APA president: I know of ‘hundreds’ of homosexuals who changed their orientation

By Kirsten Cummings

Life Site News - June 6, 2013

Nicholas Cummings - Former APA President

NEW JERSEY, June 6, 2013 (LifeSiteNews) – A renowned psychologist who was a former president of the American Psychological Association (APA) has submitted an affidavit saying that he personally treated over 2,000 homosexuals for various conditions, while his staff counselled thousands more, and he knows of “hundreds” who successfully changed their orientation.

Nicholas Cummings filed the affidavit in support of a motion by JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing) before the New Jersey Superior Court to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) accusing the group of “fraud” for offering reparative therapy services.

JONAH is a Jewish organization that offers assistance to men and women seeking to resolve their sexual conflicts, focusing specifically on unwanted same-sex attractions.

The SPLC filed a lawsuit against JONAH in November of 2012, alleging the group is guilty of “consumer fraud” because the therapy is not always successful in changing people’s sexual preferences.

The SPLC argues that sexual orientation is fixed at birth, and therefore cannot be changed with therapy. But attorneys with the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which is representing JONAH, have argued that the medical community is deeply divided on the issue. They submitted sworn affidavits from medical professionals offering evidence that sexual preference is “fluid” and adaptable to outside influences, including therapy

One of these is Cummings, a former APA president and Lifetime Achievement award winner, who was at the forefront of the psychology community’s evolving approach to homosexuality in the face of increasing public recognition of the lifestyle in the late 20th century.

Wrote Cummings, “I am … a proponent of patient self-determination. I believe and teach that gays and lesbians have the right to be affirmed in their homosexuality and also have the right to seek help in changing their sexual orientation if that is their choice.”

Cummings reports he personally treated over 2,000 people with same-sex attraction, and his staff treated an additional 16,000.

He said that homosexual patients generally sought psychological help for one of three reasons: “to come to grips with their homosexual identity, to resolve relationship issues, or to change their homosexual orientation.”

Cummings wrote that while relatively few patients opted to try and change their sexual preference, those who did were deeply unhappy with their homosexual experiences, citing issues such as “the transient nature of relationships, disgust or guilt feelings about promiscuity, fear of disease,” and “the desire to have a traditional family.”

Of those who did try to change their preference, Cummings said "hundreds" were successful, going on to lead normal heterosexual lives.

Cummings alleged that the real fraud in the case is on the side of the SPLC.

“Contending that all same-sex attraction is an unchangeable or immutable characteristic like race is a distortion of reality,” the expert wrote. “Accusing professionals who provide treatment for fully informed persons seeking to change their sexual orientation of perpetrating a fraud is not accurate. Such a tactic serves only to stigmatize the professional and shame the patient.”

Added Cummings, “A political agenda should not be permitted to prevent gays and lesbians who desire to undertake sexual orientation change efforts from exercising their right to self-determination.”

In their motion to dismiss the case JONAH’s attorneys alleged that “the plaintiffs are well aware that there is no scientific consensus that sexual orientation is fixed and immutable … [O]n the contrary … many studies have confirmed that change is possible.”

“Nevertheless,” the motion continued, “they want this court to declare that asserting that sexual orientation can be changed is an unlawful act … a deception, a fraud, a misrepresentation.”

“In other words, the plaintiffs want to use this Court not only to drive public policy on the deeply divisive issue of [reparative therapy] in a certain direction, but to shut down the debate by making one viewpoint on this issue literally illegal.”

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council called the SPLC’s assertion that reparative therapy is a fraud because not everyone is cured, “as ridiculous as suing Weight Watchers because they promised you’d lose weight and you didn’t.”

“The only people guilty of fraud are the ones who claim people with same-sex attractions can’t change,” he said.

The motion to dismiss the case against JONAH could be heard as early as June 21.

UPDATE: After hearing arguments Friday, Superior Court Judge Peter F. Bariso, Jr., in Hudson County, ruled that the case against JONAH and its two associates can proceed.

A New Jersey consumer fraud case has opened a new front in the battle over “conversion” therapies that offer counseling to gay patients looking to become straight.

The fraud case involving services offered to four young men who once struggled with their same-sex attractions will be heard Friday. Four gay men and two of the men’s mothers are suing a Jewish nonprofit corporation, saying the gay-to-straight “conversion” sessions were fraudulent and harmful.

Conversion counselors and their supporters say they are offering a legitimate service to willing customers, but the practice has come under sustained attack from gay-rights groups and others who question the scientific rigor and the results of the therapy methods.

The fraud plaintiffs want a jury to revoke the business license of Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing (JONAH), declare its services deceptive and false, and order it to repay all the money the plaintiffs spent on therapy sessions, plus other costs.

In the hearing before Superior Court Judge Peter F. Bariso Jr., in Hudson County, the plaintiffs are offering a novel legal argument that cites New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act, and say the case should be allowed to go before a jury, said Sam Wolfe, senior attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who called the conversion therapy program “bogus.”

Counsel for the defendants said the consumer fraud law is being misused to advance a political agenda to outlaw change therapies, and promises to show evidence that some people can and do “reorient” themselves to heterosexuality.

JONAH was created to help people who want to live in concert with the values of the Jewish Torah, said Charles LiMandri, chief counsel of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund.

The defendants in the case include JONAH, co-founder Arthur Goldberg and JONAH-affiliated counselor Alan Downing.

The lawsuit, first filed in November, is being heard as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican, considers whether to sign a bill that outlaws such therapies for minors.

Mr. Christie, who is running for re-election, said through a spokesman in March that he “does not believe in conversion therapy,” but still is weighing whether to sign the bill. Opponents of the bill protested that some of the lurid testimony the New Jersey lawmakers heard about reorientation therapy was completely inaccurate.

The lawsuit contends that JONAH and its top associates “falsely claimed that their services were effective in changing a person’s sexual orientation.”

The plaintiffs paid $60 to $100 an hour for services that led only to depression and emotional harm and did not result in change, the complaint said.

The four men said they also suffered abuse in the JONAH therapy sessions.

Plaintiffs Michael Ferguson, Benjamin Unger and Chaim Levin said Mr. Downing asked them to partially or fully disrobe in private or in group sessions as part of their months of therapy. Mr. Levin said he was asked to relive past sexual abuse as part of a group session, while the fourth plaintiff, Sheldon Bruck, said he was asked to snap a rubber band on his wrist when he felt same-sex attractions.

The JONAH defendants said the young men’s statements were “sensationalized” and “inaccurate” — and irrelevant, because the consumer fraud law does not apply in this case.

“Is Weight Watchers liable … every time someone signs up for that program but fails to lose weight, or gains it back?” the defense argued in a filing. The attorneys further maintained that the New Jersey court is not in a position to decide a major social controversy, such as whether people can or cannot change their sexual orientation.

People “have a right to seek counseling to live their lives as they choose. It is a matter of self-determination,” Mr. LiMandri said.

Some
of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available
in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Subscribe to The Awareness Center's Newsletter

Translate

Survivors ARE Heroes!

The Awareness Center believes ALL survivors of sex crimes should be given yellow ribbons to wear proudly.

Survivors of sexual violence (as adults and/or as a child) are just as deserving of a yellow ribbon as the men and women of our armed forces, who have been held captive as hostages or prisoners of war.

Survivors of sexual violence have been forced to learn how to survive, being held captive not by foreigners, but mostly by their own family members, teachers, camp counselors, coaches babysitters, rabbis, cantors or other trusted authority figures.

For these reasons ALL survivors of sexual violence should be seen as heroes!