1.On 1.7.1993, the date of the homicide of Anthony
First, Plaze Anderson, the friend of Anthony, was the first person to implicate Marvin Wilson and Fradarlo Brim by
saying that Montae Hudson told him
they done it.

2.On the same day, Montae said he was with Anthony
but did not see who shot because he went between two houses to urinate.

3.Six
months later, Marvin was arrested in Paducah, KY. When questioned, he said he
was in Milwaukee for his aunt' birthday
party which was the same day.

4.At the preliminary hearing, the D.A. produced as
affidavit alleging Marvin made it to Inv. Bill Warmington. The affidavit alleged Marvin said he shot at Anthony from
two houses away and that Montae, who
was with Anthony, ran up to Anthony and shot Anthony two times close range. The affidavit further alleged the guns were
thrown in the sewer by Latopitia Restaurant.

S. What's wrong with this picture is the affidavit
is manufactured by police. For six months police wanted Montae to affirm what Plaze had told them but he didn't because it
wasn't true. So police allege Marvin put Montae's name in an affidavit to scare
Montae into blaming Marvin and
Fradario to save his own life from a wrongful conviction. This was only a ruse
manufactured

by
police. Because it makes no sense for Montae to have been with Anthony but
shoots Anthony with Marvin and stay at the scene. If Marvin was guilty, the
affidavit would allege the facts or at least what the D.A. theorized. Further
if the affidavit were true, the D. A. would have charged Montae. But he didn't because they know it was a ruse
manufactured by police.

6.The D.A. said and facts prove everything in the
affidavit was false. The D.A. argued Marvin and Fradario did it - the affidavit says Marvin and Montae. The D.A. said
Marvin shot Anthony close range in
the head —the affidavit says Montae shot him close range. The D.A. argued the
guns were thrown in the sewer by
Latopitia Restaurant. The truth is, the sewers were pumped clean, sewage raked through and no guns were found. So
this affidavit was only a ruse designed to scare Montae and get a conviction. Marvin didn't make the affidavit.

7.The affidavit only consisted of 7 vague sentences
on one page even though it was enough room on the page for signatures. However, Marvin and Inv. Warmington's
signatures are on a separate piece of
paper. Warmington told Marvin this was a waiver form. Marvin only said he was
in Milwaukee at the time for his aunt's birthday party.

8.When this affidavit did not get the desired
results, the D.A. charged Montae with attempted homicide against Marvin's
cousin Leonta Willis even though Montae was not the shooter and Leonta wasn't shot. This was another scare tactic
to get Montae to affirm what Plaze had told police. Eventually Montae made an affidavit affirming what Plaze said
and the D.A. dropped the attempted
homicide charge. Though at Fradario's trial Montae plead the fifth and did not
testify to the lie Plaze told police.

9.Another ruse was
an alleged audio tape the D.A. claimed Marvin willingly made in Kentucky. In this alleged tape the D.A. claims Marvin said Montae ran
up to Anthony and shot him in the stomach.
If this is the case and this is supposed to be a confession - on top of all of
the known facts, the D.A.,
judge and defense counsel can see this is a false confession i.e. manufactured.An alleged confessor confessing to things that are not
true makes this a false confession in both alleged confessions. Facts such as Anthony being shot in
the head not the stomach, no guns in the
sewer where the alleged confessor said they would be, Fradario and not Montae
being an alleged accomplice
makes this not a true confession but manufactured evidence. According to u.s. law these inconsistencies should have made the judge
throw the case out. This is similar to the Central Park Jogger case where police manufactured
evidence against 6 innocent youth by way
of false evidence and fed information. But the D.A. and judge didn't throw out
Marvin's case because Anthony's
family works for the city of Racine and his dad has served in the u.s. military
for over 20 years at the time Marvin was fighting the case.

10..The alleged confession tape was never heard in court.
Marvin's lawyer asked for it and the D.A. gave him a blank tape. At a later hearing Marvin's lawyer
told the judge that the D.A. 'gave him a tape with a conversation on it.' And assured him that
there is an actual tape 'with words on it.' But what words?

11..Due to the above ruses Marvin's lawyer advised
that the case was unbeatable so plead no-contest to a lesser charge of second degree intentional homicide
self-defense. And possession of a firearm by a felon even though no gun was
found in relation to this case. Marvin's lawyer said he would get no time on count land maybe a couple
of years on count 2. Pleading no-contest and how the lawyer presented it seemed like a good deal. Because Marvin
was supposed to get no time on count 1. The 939.50 stat. shows how much time he
faced on each count. There was no
939.50 stat on count 1, thus no time. But it showed 939.50 3 (e) on count 2
meaning he only faced 2 years. At the
plea hearing his lawyer told him to just answer yes when the judge asked him questions. At one point Marvin tried to refute
the charges and the lawyer cut him off to keep him going along with the plea plot.

12.Marvin had several eyewitnesses
from Milwaukee to prove his whereabouts but his lawyer chose not to fight the
case and chose to rely on the false evidence the D.A. gave.

13.On
direct appeal Marvin was forced pro se. The hearing was 1.21.2000. Marvin
explained how he was framed and the
D.A. and court reporter left the courtroom to 'check the record'. They came back and said MaMn was not arrested on
7.23.1998 but on 7.24.1998 so he had to be lying about being framed by Paducah
police Phil Lewzar and Doug Abernathy. The D.A. was saying if these police weren't part of the arrest
and the arrest was on 7.24.1998 and they weren't working, then Marvin is lying. But they were working on
7.23.1998, the actual date of arrest
and they did manufacture evidence. Marvin has 8 pieces of evidence with their
names on it with 7.23.1998 as the
arrest date. And in his direct appeal was an exhibit with that same date but
the judge went along with the D.A. without the D.A. even producing any physical
evidence. This is proof of them all
taking advantage of a prose litigant.

14.This is another showing of a manufactured case.
It is required that a full transcript of that hearing is made so that the next court can see what took place. But the
judge only gave an excerpt of the
hearing, taking out everything Marvin said. This is completely illegal. It was
done to hide the truth. And at one
point they said Marvin wasn't at the hearing, so that is why there is no record of what he said. But that is a lie.
There are 4 lines that were not erased that says 'defendant' where Marvin is answering the judge.

15.Fradario was acquitted. He sent
Marvin his discovery. In it was evidence Marvin never had. It mentioned
a tape. Marvin asked Fradario about it and he said it was ofTomicca Duffy
saying Marvin was in Milwaukee at the time. This is the tape
'with words on it' that the D.A. had but made it look like something else. The
written statement of Tomicca also has 7.23.1998 as the arrest date. Fradario's
discovery had a store surveillance video of Plaze Anderson who came in the
store saying he just "seen" his friend Anthony get shot in the head.
But in all other reports Plaze says he was not there, that
Montae had told him. Further, it says Plaze killed Anthony over money
owed to him by Anthony. Plaze was the first person to implicate Marvin under
the guise that Montae told him. But told police not to let
Montae know he told them that. It could not have
been true then that Montae told him that. Plaze placed blame on Marvin first to
eliminate himself as a suspect. The store owner said Plaze
said he seen his friend get shot in the head. He knew
what part of the body Anthony was shot in whereas in every piece of evidence
the D.A. said Marvin allegedly gave, Marvin doesn't get the body
part right - he allegedly says the stomach. These facts can't be made
up. This is proof of a manufactured case.

16.A witness came
forwards saying Plaze kidnaped him because of what he saw on 1.7.1998. He said Plaze attempted to kill him, he was shot but
got away. Plaze later paid him a large sum of money to remain mute on both incidents and to let Marvin's conviction go
ahead.

17.Marvin is an innocent man in
prison. The legal system is full of technicalities that prevents Marvin's
release. The 'system' and people that work for it are more concerned with its appearance
of fairness, laws, time limits and procedures instead of Truth, Justice and
Innocence. These are just some of the facts. There are many
more.

18.If you can help in
any way it will be appreciated. Contact Marvin at: Marvin D. Wilson, 297343, NICI, P.O. Box 4000, New Lisbon, Wi. 53950.

WHAT ALLEGED WITNESSES SAID

-Police
reports say Darrel RoIlin9 (DEE) called Anthony First over to his house at
6:15p.m. to 'kick it'. Anthony (the
victim) arrives at 6:20 with Montae Hudson. In the span of 5 minutes Darrel
says as Anthony (known as Apache in reports) arrived he (Darrel) is leaving
with Mikisha Barker to go to somewhere
unknown. While Darrel leaves Anthony in his house alone with his girlfriend,
Roshelle Barker, Darrel leaves with
Mikisha and gets as far as the corner and hears gunshots. He turns around, he says, because his kids are in the house, and finds
Anthony bleeding.

-People are questioned
about what happened. Darrel's girlfriend, Roshelle, says no one was in the
house besides her and Anthony - no
kids. The car 'Darrel says' Anthony arrived in was owned by Stanly Eggerson. Stanly said Dee (Darrel) was driving his
car, he was going to sell it to Quick (Plaze Anderson). Darrel, Anthony and Plaze were all friends. Inv.
Soderberg asked who had the keys to the Blue Cutlass Darrel says Anthony arrived in. Darrel says that
he has them. Now if Darrel's story is true that Anthony was driving the Blue Cutlass, then why does he have
the keys and why does Stanly say he (Darrel) was driving his car because he was go sell it to Quick? Darrel's answer is,
he moved the Blue Cutlass that Anthony
was allegedly driving out of the driveway because it was blocking in
Mikisha's car. What's wrong with this
theory is, if Anthony was really driving the Cutlass and Darrel only drove it
out of the driveway, shouldn't Darrel have given the keys back before he had
left with Mikisha in her car? Why is Darrel
trying to distance himself from the Cutlass by saying Anthony drove it over to
his house and he only drove it to move it out of the driveway so Mikisha could
move her car and the owner, Stanly, says he (Darrel) was driving his car? Shouldn't the owner know who was driving
his car? And still Darrel should not
still have the keys if he left with Mikisha in her car.

-Darrel
was beaten up at the funeral of Anthony. He was accused of having something to
do with Anthony's death. Police still
used him as a witness to build a case against Marvin Wilson and Fradario Brim.
In one interview Darrel accused Marvin and his younger cousin Leonte Willis. In
a different one Darrel accuses Marvin,
Leonte and Fradario. And in another report Darrel says it was 4 shooters. He didn't say who the fourth person was though. Most
other reports from other witnesses said it was only 2 shooters and that they were 'tall'- 67'.
Marvin is about 5'9", Fradario and Leonte are about 5,10",
6' respectively.

-A drug addict named Marian Adams said in three reports
that she didn't see what had happened. She said she was in her house in one
report. Then thought that the shots were coming from the alley in another. And
that 'people on the streets were saying it was "Dario'. She finally blamed
Marvin and a figment of her imagination. The figment's name was
Dee, 5'6" with a high-top fade haircut.( The other Dee
(Darrel) is about 6'3".) Now recall this is 1998, the high-top fade had
died out in 1994/95. It's back now but it didn't exist in 1998. Adams knows
Marvin by face and she knows Brim but she did not accuse him at
his trial. Also in the reports that Marian says she didn't see anything, she
says that Anthony is her cousin. Now if she really seen
Marvin shoot Anthony, she would have told the police the first 3 times she was
interviewed since Anthony is her cousin. Talk arouse that Plaze had given
Marian some money and drugs to blame Marvin. She didn't
blame Fradarlo in reports, nor in a photo lineup or at his trial. She only
said, 'people on the streets were saying it was Dario." So she didn't see
it. And when pressed by police about this, she too, like
Darrel, added another shooter, saying his back was to her but she didn't see his
face.

-A
witness that was never heard from is Open Pantry store owner Randy Kong. Randy
said Plaze came in the store saying that he had just
'seen' his friend get shot in the head. But in all other reports Plaze says he
wasn't there. There is a store surveillance tape of this. It may have other
potential witnesses that overheard Plaze saying this.
The-police report to this says the subject, Plaze, in this video is 67'. Plaze was the
first person to accuse Marvin under the guise that Montae had told him. But out
of Fradario's discovery is the above and reports saying Plaze
killed Anthony over money owed to him by Anthony. Another
where an anonymous female caller said she was just at a residence on Franklin
and people said "Quick" had something to
do with it.

-The
police raided Marvin's aunt Veronica house in Racine. They found .22 caliber
bullets. They say that Anthony was shot with a 9mm and
357 (or big 38). No 9mm, 357 or 38 caliber bullets were found at this residence.
When Marvin was arrested in Paducah, KY 6 months later an unloaded .22 revolver
was found in the house. No other weapons, nor bullets.

-At the
preliminary hearing Marvin was taken out of the courtroom and Darrel was
brought in to testify. This is totally illegal. Marvin
called his family after the hearing and his aunt Veronica told him
"Dee" testified and described what he
looked like.

-Plaze, Darrel and Marian all know Marvin had nothing to
do with this case. The police, specifically, Bill Warmington,
know this also. All of their stories fall apart and are questionable. Plaze is
the first person to blame Marvin, possibly to throw
police off of him as a suspect because 3 reports that blamed him were
not in Marvin's discovery but they are all dated 1-7-1998, the date of the
homicide. So they existed from day one but was not in
Marvin's discovery. Darrel's story changed every time he spoke to the police.
He went from 2,3 then 4 people being involved. Once saying Leonte had on a
black coat then Fradario had the black coat and
leonte had a white one. Then saying Fradario had on the white coat. Warmington
even asked him to clarify this and he got flustered. Black and white are like
night and day. Two totally different things. And
Marian says 3 times she seen nothing and in the first interview she said
Anthony was her cousin. If she seen Marvin do this, she would have told the
first time. And this 5'6" Dee with the high-top fade is never
found because he only exist in her mind.

Marvin is innocent and needs help. If you can help him, contact him at:
Marvin D. Wilson, NLCI, P.O. Box 4000, New Lisbon, WI 53950

This blog is a companion to our Parole web page. Wisconsin has 2887 prisoners who are eligible for parole but are denied year after year. We are part of a campaign to see that these people get a second chance. They are all long past their parole dates. We want to spread the message loud and clear that people DO Change. Below are some of the stories and profiles of the many people stuck in a broken and wasteful system.