1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon. .
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville. Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled. Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: no live videos, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to accont for the "passengers".Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

There were no Planes because if there were it would have been very hard to do it as the 'Hollywood' Special Effects Departments did in the Edited Feeds that many 'brainwashed' Captain Video's think was LIVE TV....Captain Video is having a hard time DE-Promgraming themselves from the LIVE From CNN etc.....

If you look at the made to arouse your attention Plane that doesn't appear to be a passenger Jet [done on purpose] as it goes in to WTC 1 [the second Plane] it doesn't break appart because it's a Edited Feed of a Plane....the exposion blasts outwards...enough if you can't figure it out ...stay in Disney-Land and await your 'Chip'...

Holograms were used on the outside 4 the people to see a Jet coming in but they were very poor on the Jet noise area....so awake People did notice that there was no Jet Engine noise...

As said before they went to great lenghts to make you think that Planes were there...from the 1st Liar down............

Ave Maria !

If you want to analize a pile of shit and guess what part was the Lima Bean and where that Bean came from..what farm and what materials the plant used to make the bean or the Chicken and what it ate etc...you would have to be on a angelic dimensions...it's just a wild goose chase that people love so...a fn Murder Mystery :roll:

All the great dramas in the last 4 thousand years of History are just Scripts out of the Insane Minds of the Controllers of the Illuminati....a on-going 'Wag the Dog' Soap.......................Infinity

I've said this before about the no-planes theory, but it's worth repeating.

If there were no planes, then how did they smuggle the 20,000+ gallons
of kerosene up to where the huge explosion took place? Did they just
bring it up in one of the lifts? Or maybe they brought it in a couple of
gallons at a time --hidden inside briefcases.

Or maybe the huge fuel-air explosion was a hologram too. And maybe
they planted explosives in the outline of a plane so the result would look
convincing?

So tell me this. Why go to all that bother?

Cruise missiles can be targeted at a ventillation shaft and could certainly
have precisely homed in on any part of the second tower. So, presumably,
the 9/11 plotters were unable to secure a plane and figure out how to fit
it with cruise-missile technology to make it slam into the second tower
at exactly the right point.

Which is clearly rubbish.

Slamming a plane into the tower is a piece of cake.

So why bother faking it, when you can just do it?
So why bother faking it, when you can just do it?

All this is 9/11 Analysis 101.

Nobody who thinks it through can possibly buy the no planes theory.

But I am not saying that the famous CNN footage is unretouched.
That's another issue. But you better have your thinking hat on to figure
just why someone would would mess with 9/11 footage. One reason is to
deliberately seed the pod and flash theories. Think about it.

However I am saying that the easiest way to inflict the damage and
effects is to hit the building with a cruise-controled, kerosene-laden plane.

My own analysis of the soundtrack of the explosion suggests two high
intensity charges aboard the plane to trigger the kerosene esplosion.

for years, from robotic planes with missles to Holograms n the foolish stuff but one day talked to a bright woman who I had talked to before but this time in our conversation she just had to tell me she was there on West St [Hudson River side] when she heard the explosion at WTC 1 [the second one] and looked up and saw the Hole in Building and Fire but she SAID THAT SHE HAD HEARD NO JET NOISE [she just had to tell me this and knew I would give her, her answer]....told her because their was no Jets and in my mind I just KNEW THEN, that it was Holograms and Controlled Demolitions and I told her so and she just knew that she had her answer......I called Alan Watt a few days later and mentioned the incident with the Woman and Holograms and Alan said to me, did I see 'Wag the Dog' ? and did I know the Apollo Moon Landings were fake and I said Yes to both...well he said do you know now what it was and everything from the years of looking at '911' fell into place and that is why I close the book on it and say It was a Hollywood Production....'911 Wag the WTC/Pentagon PROGRAM' and on-going 'SOAP'... ...the fire-balls were Hollywood 'fire'...so u could research how many pounds of that fake fire they would need or it could have been a Hologram for those present and a EDITED FEED for TV..... :roll:

Well there can be some 'Corn' in the 'Pile' also, just said Lima Beans cause I like 'em' ...and I do think about where all the 'Elements' that make-us-up were in 'their' travels in 'Creation'...

Ohh and I don't alway's agree with Alan and I'm not his 'moonie' but I do respect his 'genius'...was taking last Sunday with Alan on the Phone for a hour n a half [[been talking iwith him for 2yrs,bout} ...and mentioned that I was dropping his name and he did say that it was , ok.....I don't pretend or claim to be his spokes-person or do I claim to be able to re-count the story as it took place but do try to give the 'essence'....Alan does say 'Holograms were used and it was a Production, Hollywood Style n edited TV Feeds and more....would love to hear Fintan interview him and ask him to spend a-little time on the '911 Program' from Big Brother and Babylonian Harlot Studios..........

Remember the idea that it was a plane fits right into the NWO order agenda more than a missle. Also 99.9 percent of us were not there to see anything and so we must rely on national television news footage again this falls right into their agenda. I am not saying it was a hologram but this whole thing was perception managed and if they want us to think there were planes they they did a good job. You cant prrove there was no plane becuase you cant provide a photo of no plane so it is possible.

There were no Planes because if there were it would have been very hard to do it as the 'Hollywood' Special Effects Departments did in the Edited Feeds that many 'brainwashed' Captain Video's think was LIVE TV....Captain Video is having a hard time DE-Promgraming themselves from the LIVE From CNN etc.....
........................................................................................................

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh well as my fellow-driver [was still driving his-own Yellow Cab in NYC last time I saw him, he was 86yo, he's RIP now, used to say "when you know, you know" can't tell em, till then....... :roll:

Also a 'real' Plane might have left 'evidence' that might have fallen into the 'wrong' hands...

OK, Captain Video [s] you can run around in circles like 'they' want you too, yeah, saw the Edited Film Missle coming out the other side too, LOL...when you know, you know...

Like the picture of the Driver shooting JFK and Bill Cooper and Alan Watt both say it was the Driver who Killed JFK but 'others' will 'boch-a-galop it up 4ever so 2 say..................... :roll:

Get a loop-to-loop of the Plane going in and you will see clearly that it's a edited clip and the plane doesn't break at all, remember the outer wall with the Windows was all steel supports....

Holy Dora Dyke, Robin !............................... right-on

Ave Maria !.....................Infinity

{ what about the 50 or so BILLION in GOLD that was under the WTC ? and the stock trades...oyeah, they had their pin-up girl, Martha...}

The only thing that is obvious to me is that we were all intended to believe was that UNITED and AMERICAN airplanes were hijacked on US soil, and used to attack AMERICA.

That provided ample reason to militarize the airports and give citizens a clear choice: Relinquish all individual rights to property and privacy, or stay home. Considering some sort of air travel is a necessity for most people these days, it provided the opportunity to investigate anybody near an airplane as part of the war on terror. That's a fascist wet dream already, especially when it's smothered in Patriot act gravy.

All the footage of the towers' demise looks weird to me, but then I have little to compare it with. It makes sense to me, though, that if the 'perps' had the ability to pull off a holographic impact, then they certainly had the ability to dive a real plane in there, so, why use the hologram?

What operational advantage would a holographic plane have over a real plane when the object is to get us to see a real plane - it implies that it couldn't be done with real planes. Is there any reason why a real plane couldn't have been used?

If anybody thinks commercial airlines are not tightly regulated federal assets, I'll beg to differ. I don't think the DiCaprio's version of Howard Hughes really painted the complete picture.

What would the use of holograms accomplish that real planes couldn't?

If both options had the same intentional effect, then what is gained from making the distinction at all? Swapping a prop or two doesn't change the script's plot.