Gov. Sam Brownback's campaign for re-election is raising funds off a federal lawsuit filed against a gun bill he signed.

In an email sent Thursday, Brownback's campaign said the lawsuit the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed on behalf of five Kansans is reason to financially support his re-election bid.

"To put it simply, the gun-grabbers at the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence are suing Governor Sam Brownback for protecting the Second Amendment rights of Kansans," the campaign email states. "That’s right, they’re suing him for defending the Constitution."

Jon Lowy, director of the Brady Center's Legal Action project, said that was a mischaracterization of the lawsuit and it was inappropriate for the governor to use the legal action as a fundraising tool.

“I do think it’s galling that the governor who signed legislation which is likely going to cost Kansas taxpayers thousands of dollars to unsuccessfully defend is now using a lawsuit brought by Kansas citizens to raise money for his personal political campaign," Lowy said in a phone interview Friday.

The target of the lawsuit, the "Second Amendment Protection Act," states that the federal government has no jurisdiction over firearms made and sold in Kansas and makes it a felony to enforce federal laws on such guns.

During testimony on the bill last year, a representative from Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt's office warned that the U.S. Constitution's "Supremacy Clause" bars states from waiving federal law and Schmidt requested an additional $225,000 after the law passed in anticipation of having to defend it in court. Schmidt has called the timing of the Brady Center suit "political" and vowed to fight it.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who owns a financial stake in an Overland Park company planning to manufacture AR-15 tactical rifles, said last year the state would welcome a challenge to the bill, calling it "a fight worth having."

Lowy said legal precedent, including a federal appeals court striking down a similar Montana law, is on the plaintiffs' side.

“I would challenge the governor to offer any legal support for the proposition that Kansas can exempt itself from federal gun laws," Lowy said. "I don’t think there is any.”

The Brownback campaign fundraising email also suggests the Brady Center is colluding with President Barack Obama's administration to try to thwart the Kansas gun law.

"Last year, Gov. Brownback championed the Second Amendment Protection Act, which exempts firearms manufactured and owned in Kansas from being subjected to the regulations or authority from the Obama Administration and gun-grabbing (U.S.) Attorney General Eric Holder," the email states. "The President’s administration must not have liked this because they decided to find some Washington, D.C., lawyers at the Brady Center to try and get rid of the new law."

It's the second time this week Brownback has suggested the Brady Center is acting as Obama's puppet.

“For the governor to repeat his suggestion that the Obama Administration is behind this lawsuit when he knows there’s absolutely no involvement is also disturbing," Lowy said. "This lawsuit is brought by Kansas residents who are greatly disturbed that their Legislature is sacrificing the public safety of Kansans to cater to the gun lobby.”

When asked for evidence that the Obama Administration is behind the Brady Center lawsuit, Brownback campaign manager Mark Dugan provided the following statement:

"What's clear is that President Obama and the Brady Center share the goals of neutering Kansas citizens' Second Amendment rights," Dugan said. "The day after the governor signed the Second Amendment Protection Act he received a letter from President Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, claiming the bill was unconstitutional and now their liberal allies are suing the state of Kansas, citing General Holder's letter in their legal filing."

Lowy said that's no evidence.

“We also cited a long line of U.S. Supreme Court precedent, as well as 9th Circuit (Court of Appeals) precedent that held that a law very similar to Kansas' is patently unconstitutional,” Lowy said.

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of
civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site.
Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate
language, but readers might find some comments offensive or
inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the
"Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

The law has nothing to do with the rifles being manufactured in KS. Other than the fact that the law also says they can be manufactured without serial numbers (I believe). Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Politicians are always looking for a parade to lead. In this case, the BB clan views the lawsuit as a potential parade that will have many followers. Of course they would attempt to raise money from those followers.

This one should be easy to call as many legal decisions at all levels of the court support the Brady Center's position. Unfortunately, the followers of BB and this particular parade will continue to believe as they do, regardless of the outcome of the suit, which will likely be well beyond election day. The BB clan will not want it decided before then and will delay, delay, delay.

I thought all you conservatives were ALL ABOUT "freedom of religion!?" Apparently, when translated, this means "freedom of Christianity, and screw the rest of 'em!"

If a privately owned corporation can claim "personhood" in an effort to force the owners 'sincerely held religious beliefs' on employees, then an ACTUAL PERSON can absolutely claim the same...thanks, Hobby Lobby!

You'll forgive me with your SOB story, it seems rather disingenuous and hypocritical...

With the large double banana clip and tactical bayonet laser flashlight attachment while holding three small children at a Target, while eating chili-cheese fries wearing the American flag as a cape! Let's see the photo-op! That's the ticket to an instant NRA triple A rating!

It is things like this that make me almost ashamed to claim Kansas as my home. Doesn't anyone know the meaning of respect and common sense any more? It seems to me that these have been lost to the me, me, me first before anyone else attitude of all of the erstwhile politicians both here and in Washington.

is simply trying to appeal to all the ignorant nutcase western Kansans who will vote for anyone with an R after their name on ballot, but first he needs to scare the hell out of them with claiming a threat from the nasty feds.

Just as in this country we don't allow human sacrifices even if your religion allows that and we don't allow polygamy, even if your religion allows that and we don't allow you to sell your daughter for cattle, even if your religion allows that. When religion conflicts with established or Constitutional law in the U.S. it pretty much loses. So, no, I really doubt that anybody here supports Sharia Law - it's just that most of us, I would hope, don't run around looking under rocks trying to find something that is not a threat to turn it into a threat in order to reach some political purpose. I imagine that most of us are too busy working and trying to support a family to partake in the witch-hunts that are becoming more popular again. Even Schmidt, who has spent the last several years trying to get further to the right KNOWS this law has no chance. Only the Kobachs, who profits from trying to defend these types of laws, keep pushing them. It is kinda interesting that sammy is having to run against Obama again. I guess he figured it worked once and he really can't push anything he's done so it's worth another try!

To make then think they could keep slavery and segregation. The Supreme court shot that notion down over 100 years ago. And these tea party clowns think they can use the same failed argument today. Apparently the idea has some appeal to simpletons foolish enough to buy it.