Vir Sanghvi is an Indian journalist who is a staunch critic of Sathya Sai Baba. He is currently the editorial director for the Hindustan Times (which may explain why they almost exclusively report negative information about Sathya Sai Baba), former editor for Sunday, former consulting editor for Anada Bazaar Patrika, former editor for Imprint, founder-editor for Bombay Magazine and currently writes a Counterpoint weekly column in the Hindusan Times. Vir Sanghvi was allegedly educated at Mayo College, Ajmer and Oxford University, is reputed as being one of the youngest editors in India and is also a television personality.

Don't let all of these credentials fool you. Vir Sanghvi is willing to compromise his integrity and reputation as a journalist by resorting to disrespectable research, bias and sensationalistic propaganda to promote his views against Sathya Sai Baba.

On November 25th 2006, Vir Sanghvi wrote a Counterpoint columnist article in the Hindustan Times entitled "The Truth About Sathya Sai Baba". Not only did Vir Sanghvi not know that Sathya Sai Baba turned 81 (he claimed Baba turned 80), he admitted that he is "not big on Sathya Sai Baba" and referred to him as the "old boy".

In his Counterpoint article, Vir Sanghvi made the following inaccurate claims about Sathya Sai Baba:

Sathya Sai Baba just celebrated his 80'th birthday.

There is a "sordid controversy" about Sathya Sai Baba engaging in questionable behavior with "little boys".

The homosexual allegations against Sathya Sai Baba are "too numerous to dispute".

That the list of Western complainants runs "into triple figures".

All of Sathya Sai Baba's miracles can easily be performed by conjurors.

Those opposing Sathya Sai Baba wage an unremitting smear campaign against him that accuses him of "serial pedophilia" and the sexual abuse of "boys" and "children". These allegations are fallacious, unsustantiated and wholly untrue. There are no testimonies from "boys", "children" or parents of children that support the erroneous claim that Sathya Sai Baba is a pedophile who engaged in sexual interactions with children. To date, there are no court cases, police complaints, affidavits, public grievances or lawsuits from any parent alleging that Sathya Sai Baba sexually abused his/her child. Not even one single legitimate complaint. Sathya Sai Baba has never been charged with any crime, has never been convicted of any crime and has never had even one single complaint lodged against him, first-hand, by any alleged victim (child, teenager, parent or adult) in India.

Vir Sanghvi cannot cite even one single police complaint or court case that supports his erroneous claim that Sathya Sai Baba engaged in questionable behavior with "little kids". One would think that a journalist of Vir Sanghvi's calibre would have the basic integrity to research and confirm allegations before publishing unsupported opinions, speculations and conspriacy theories in the Hindustan Times. To date, neither Vir Sanghvi or anyone else have been able to confirm even one single case where Sathya Sai Baba engaged in questionable behavior with "little kids".

To support his claim that the homosexual abuse allegations against Sathya Sai Baba are "too numerous to dispute", Vir Sanghvi suggested that one enter "Sathya Sai Baba" and "homosexuality" into a Google search. Because there are almost 18,000 returns, Vir Sanghvi concluded that these allegations are "too numerous to dispute" and some of these allegations must be true. What kind of journalist bases facts and figures on Google results? This is not only shabby research, it is poor journalism.

For example, enter "George Bush" and "homosexuality" into a Google search and you will get an astounding 1,250,000 (plus) returns: View Results. Enter "Jesus" and "homosexuality" into a Google search and you will get an astounding 1,300,000 (plus) returns: View Results. Enter "Mother Teresa" and "homosexuality" into a Google search and you will get 330,000 (plus) returns: View Results. Using Vir Sanghvi's lamentable logic, one must conclude that some of these results are indicative that George Bush, Jesus and Mother Teresa engaged in acts of homosexuality. What kind of journalist uses this type of propaganda as "evidence" against others? In my opinion, the only type of journalists who engage in this type of low-class propaganda are tabloid journalists who care less for facts and care more for sensationalism and fiction.

Since Vir Sanghvi is not an internationally revered guru like Sathya Sai Baba (who has millions of followers), these results are high for one person. Are we to conclude that Mr. Sanghvi engaged in acts of "homosexuality" and that he is "stupid", "corrupt", "biased" and "offensive" based on Google's results? Using Sanghvi's standard, the answer is "yes". After all this is the standard and "evidence" that he attempted to use against Sathya Sai Baba. Why can't others use the same standard against Mr. Sanghvi?

For those who are not gullible, naive or sensationalists, Google's results are not indicative of guilt, evidence, complaints, behavior or anything else for that matter. Google's results simply return webpages (many duplicates) with all possible combinations of keywords located on any given webpage. This explains the Google results obtained for George Bush, Jesus and Mother Teresa. This also explains why Vir Sanghvi had 500+ Google results when his name was combined with the word "homosexuality".

I am not aware of any list composed of Westerner complainants that "runs into triple figures". Where did Vir Sanghvi obtain this information from?

On the sites run by ex-devotees of Sathya Sai Baba, they provide a list of alleged sexual abuse victims. The list is composed of sixteen names (many are fake names). That's it. See For Yourself. All of these alleged victims (except one 16 year old) are adults 18 to 31 years of age. No "little boys" are listed. Perhaps Mr. Sanghvi could inform us as to which reliable source he viewed to support his claim that there is a "list of complainants" that runs "into triple figures" (for Westerners only)?

It is my strong suspicion that Vir Sanghvi is either referring to the bogus online-petition against Sathya Sai Baba on SaiPetition.net (in which anyone can submit multiple fake entries under multiple fake names) or he is referring to Robert Priddy's bogus list of "Prominent Ex-Devotees Of Sai Baba" (a majority who were never"fondled" by Sathya Sai Baba and whose names were mostly lifted from the bogus online-petition website). Why is it that a notable journalist like Vir Sanghvi cannot back up his claims with verifiable and reliable sources? Are these the low standards that Vir Sanghvi must utilize in order to promote his Anti-Sai bias and poorly-constructed arguments in the Hindustan Times? Sadly, this appears to be the case.

Mr. Sanghvi claimed that "every single one" of Sathya Sai Baba's miracles can be easily performed by even "moderately-talented conjurors". Although it is true that any alleged materialization that Sathya Sai Baba performs will be inextricably tied to doubt, I have yet to see any "conjuror" who can heal people from incurable diseases, appear to people all around the world (in dreams, visions and physical form) and manifest vibuthi, amrita, kumkum, tumeric, holy water, mishri, coins, statues of gods and goddesses, siva lingams, crystals, gems, fragrances, flowers, lights, and various other substances on the altars of devotees all around the world and in the privacy of their own homes (like Sathya Sai Baba is reputed as doing).

There are literally thousands of such stories and first-hand accounts. Even some ex-devotees (to this day) still attest to Sathya Sai Baba's paranormal abilities.

The following links show a small sampling of manifestations and materializations typically associated with Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. These manifestations occur in the privacy of devotee's homes all around the world, thousands of miles away from Sathya Sai Baba's physical form. Any "conjuror" up to duplicating these alleged miracles?:

I think Mr. Vir Sanghvi owes Sathya Sai Baba an apology and should immediately retract his erroneous, inaccurate and dishonest comments until a time comes when he can factually document his current speculations and assumptions with verifiable, accurate and truthful data from reliable and reputable sources. The style of Vir Sanghvi's article is emotional, as opposed to objective. This behavior is not what one would expect from the editorial director of the Hindustan Times. Or is it?

The internet version of Vir Sanghvi's article allows for people to submit responses. Although several responses (pro and con) were published, mine was not, hence this webpage. Just more proof of the suppression and dictator-like control weilded by Vir Sanghvi on the Hindustan Times and his abject failure to accept responsiblity for his blind guesswork, second-rate research, overemotionalism and ludicrous claims against Sathya Sai Baba.

On November 4th 2006, Paul Lewis ("The Guardian" newspaper journalist) published an article against Sathya Sai Baba entitled "The Indian living god, the paedophilia claims and the Duke of Edinburgh awards." It has recently come to light that Paul Lewis wrote his article in exclusive collaboration with Anti-Sai Activists, including the fully exposed pervert Sanjay Kishore Dadalani. The text from the article is as follows:

The Indian Living God, The Paedophilia Claims And The Duke Of Edinburgh Awards

A spiritual group whose "living god" founder has been accused of sexually abusing young boys has become an accredited partner of the Duke of Edinburgh award scheme, the Guardian can reveal.Last night pressure was mounting on the charity to break its links with the group whose followers are devoted to the preachings of 79-year-old holy man, Sai Baba.

About 200 young people will fly to India in two weeks' time on a humanitarian pilgrimage run by Sai Youth UK, a division of the Sri Sathya Sai Organisation. The teenagers and young men earn their Duke of Edinburgh awards for humanitarian work, chiefly distributing medical aid.

The trip coincides with Sai Baba's 80th birthday and has been arranged, organisers say, after he gave a divine commandment for the UK's Sai youth movement to visit him for the occasion.

For decades male former devotees have alleged that the guru molested them during so-called "interviews". During the last youth pilgrimage, in 2004, young people were granted group interviews with the guru after administering medical aid to villages surrounding Sai Baba's ashram in Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, although there was no evidence of abuse.

Large numbers of young men have travelled from across the world to study alongside and meet the guru. His supporters say their encounter was spiritually enriching. Others, including participants in a BBC programme, The Secret Swami, two years ago, accuse him of abuse, claiming he massaged their testicles with oil and coerced them into oral sex.

Sai Baba has never been charged over the sex abuse allegations. However, the US State Department issued a travel warning after reports of "inappropriate sexual behaviour by a prominent local religious leader" which, officials later confirmed was a reference to Sai Baba.

Tom Sackville, a former Home Office minister and chairman of Fair, a cult-watching and victim support group, said: "It is appallingly naive for the award scheme to involve young people and the royal family with an organisation whose leader is accused of paedophilia. Parents who plan to send their children on this month's pilgrimage ... should be aware of the danger their children are being exposed to."

But Peter Westgarth, chief executive of the charity, last night faced down calls to terminate his organisation's relationship with the Sai organisation. He said: "This is not the only religion accused of paedophilia. Young people who are participating on these trips are doing so because they choose to," he said. "The awards accredit the good work they do for poor people in India. We make no judgment about their religion. We would no sooner intervene here than we would the Church Lads' and Girls' Brigade."

The Conservative MP Michael Gove said he would write to the charity asking it to consider a stricter monitoring of the organisations they they work with. "As a society we need a more determined effort to identify and expose those religious cults and extremists that pose a direct threat to people, so that they do not enjoy patronage that should be directed elsewhere," he said.

Shitu Chudasama, Sai's UK national youth coordinator, defended the trip, saying it was primarily a humanitarian mission to help impoverished people, saying that the sex abuse claims were "totally unfounded". He added: "We hope to have an interview with Sai Baba but it's not guaranteed. If he wants to see us, he'll call us."

Sai Organisation's UK branch has also came into contact with royals through the awards, something Buckingham Palace was made aware of in September. In correspondence seen by the Guardian, Brigadier Sir Miles Hunt-Davis, Prince Philip's private secretary, wrote: "[We] are very keen to get this sorted out properly and finally." He said trustees of the award would undertake legal advice before deciding how to proceed.

In July the Sai Organisation received a certificate for their "invaluable contribution" to the awards at a Buckingham Palace garden party. A news story which appeared on a Sai Baba website after the ceremony was removed after an intervention by Peter Westgarth, who said the event had been misrepresented.

In the posting, Mr Chudasama recounted the moment he delivered a speech to "various dignitaries, diplomats, ministers [and] famous celebrities" at the palace. "I was the last speaker called up, and suddenly a confidence, a joy, engulfed my being," he said. "I attributed everything to our founder Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. As I spoke I watched the sea of faces, they were hanging from my every word and there was a look of excitement on their faces as if to say 'why have we not heard of this organisation before?'."

Mr Chudasama also attended a private audience with Prince Philip at St James's Palace last year. "Prince Philip showed a very keen interest in our youth and asked many questions," Mr Chudasama wrote in a Sai newsletter. "I also had the opportunity to mention ... that we drew our inspiration and motivation from our founder Sri Sathya Sai Baba; he paused for a few seconds and then said: "Very good".

Backstory

Saytha Sai Baba, who has an estimated 30 million followers worldwide, is possibly India's most controversial holy man. He gained a following in his teens when he claimed to have divine powers and, later, said he was an incarnation of God. His teachings are benign - his most famous mantra is "Love All, Serve All" - and he encourages followers, which include many of India's political elite, to undertake humanitarian work. He purports to be able to miraculously conjure sacred ash and expensive jewellery into the palm of his hand, as if out of thin air. Opponents dismiss his miracles as party tricks. The Sai Organisation claims to have more than 1,200 Saytha Sai Baba Centres in more than 100 countries. (Reference)

On a QuickTopic forum, Sanjay conceded that Paul Lewis' article was the direct result of collaboration between Anti-Sai Activists and The Guardian newspaper. Paul Lewis' biased Anti-Sai newspaper article was in planning for six months. Here are Sanjay's comments (fully acknowledging that the newspaper article against Sathya Sai Baba was a premeditated, concerted and deliberateAnti-Sai-Baba hack job):

Want to talk about blindness? I warned you fools about this months ago, but you're way too thick to pick up the hints. I even warned you months in advance about the BBC movie, and you were too thick to pick up the hints about that too. Nothing has changed even two years later. :-)

Indeed, on April 24th 2006, Sanjay did give a warning about a coming Anti-Sai exposure in November regarding the very same UK Youth Group Trip that formed the basis to The Guardian newspaper article. On the SSB2 Yahoo Group, Sanjay said:

Sai Baba, male-rapist extraordinaire, has been drooling for TWO YEARS expecting the entire UK Youth contingent to travel to Puttaparthi and satisfy his perverted sexual cravings. It's all going down this November. Details to follow (Reference).

Six months later, come November (just as Sanjay said), Paul Lewis' Anti-Sai article was published about (you guessed it) the UK Youth Group Trip and allegations of "pedophilia".

More admissions from Sanjay on QuickTopic:

What you morons fail to realise is that these things take months of planning and co-ordinated research, especially by journalists and reporters of prestigious newspapers (such as the Times, Daily Telegraph, Australian Age, etc etc) who tend to go off and do their own research in the hope of turning up something new. We already knew about this issue months before the date pf publication of course. In fact it was mooted as a front-page story, but at the last minute a development in a legal issue involving PM Tony Blair took precedence and the Sai Baba article was moved to Page 3. No matter, open the paper and it all goes BOOM! in your face...How did you like the distractions, Moreno? Sorry I couldn't take part while I was busy participating in this development...We run the Exposé and the Exposé continues.

WE run the Exposé and the Exposé continues!

And yes, I know all about what has gone on behind the scenes. This is the stuff I am working on while you idiots are arguing endlessly over who's a bigger pervert than who when the biggest pervert of all (Sai Baba) has just been exposed today (Saturday 4th November 2006) in a very nice Page 3 spread in a highbrow British newspaper like The Guardian. Of course, I already know which page it's on even though I don't have it yet. In a few hours I'll go out and purchase a hard copy. :-)

Needless to say, it is exactly this type of hidden bias that is responsible for misleading so many people about Sai Baba. This very same type of hidden bias is to be found in both the Secret Swami Documentary and Michelle Goldberg's Salon.com article entitled Untouchable?. This time around, however, we have direct admissions from Sanjay Dadlani that this newspaper article was the unequivocal result of behind-the-scenes scheming, subterfuge and collaboration between The Guardian, Paul Lewis and Anti-Sai Activists themselves.

First of all, Baba is not 79 years old. He is going to be 81 years old this year and his 80th birthday celebrations occurred last year. It is nothing short of utter absurdity to claim that an 81 year old guru in a wheelchair is going to sexually molest children. This is exactly what Anti-Sai Activists want others to believe. As a matter of fact, one must remember that Anti-Sai Activists repeatedly make the arguments that Sathya Sai Baba suffers from frail health, stumbles often while walking, has thinning hair, suffers from dementia, broke bones going back to 1988 and allegedly suffered several heart attacks. This is the type of "frail person" who allegedly has the libido of a teenager and the strength of a giant to subdue healthy male adults in the prime of their youth.

I found it very disturbing that Paul Lewis (intentionally?) left out the wholly relevant word "unconfirmed" when he cited the U.S. State Department Warning (that Anti-Sai Activists boasted on accomplishing themselves: Reference). Paul Lewis selectively wrote:

"...the US State Department issued a travel warning after reports of 'inappropriate sexual behaviour by a prominent local religious leader'...".

The warning actually said (not mentioning Baba by name):

"...unconfirmed reports of inappropriate sexual behavior by a prominent local religious leader..." (Reference).

Is it just coincidence that Paul Lewis left out the very same word (i.e., "unconfirmed") that Anti-Sai Activists leave out in their error-filled writings? I think not.

Although Paul Lewis had six months to research his article, he apparently missed my high-ranking pages concerning Alaya Rahm (The BBC "Secret Swami" prime witness) who ended up self-dismissing his own lawsuit against the Sathya Sai Baba Society after Lewis Kreydick (a witness named by Alaya himself) came forward and thoroughly refuted Alaya's claims (Refs: 01 - 02).

Tom Sackville has been made fully aware of all this information (I personally emailed it to him), yet he continues on as if he is oblivious to these facts. Neither Tom Sackville, Anti-Sai Activists, Paul Lewis or anyone else for that matter can produce even one"pedophilia" testimony from a "child", "boy" or "kid" (or told by a parent) who was allegedly sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba. Paul Lewis researched his article for six months in collaboration with Anti-Sai Activists (who claim they have the real "evidence" against Satya Sai Baba) and even with their help, Lewis could not substantiate the "pedophilia" claims with one single testimony or story. This is revealing in itself.

Purposely withheld from the general public were Alaya Rahm's promiscuous sexual activities (prior to meeting Sai Baba) and his self-admission (in the "Response To Form Interrogatories" court records) to being a decade-long daily user of illegal street drugs and alcohol. Alaya was so "seriously sexually abused" he suffered no psychological trauma that would have required medical or psychiatric care, by his own admission. Alaya identified no psychologist who had ever examined him, nor did his parents ever send him to see any kind of therapist. Alaya, although an adult, was being financially supported by his parents and only came forward with his allegations of sexual abuse when his parents (on a surprise visit) threatened to cut him off financially because they were displeased with his lifestyle, the company he was keeping and his failure to behave in a proper manner.

Anti-Sai Activists also attempt to hide the fact that Alaya Rahm made very disturbing claims that Sathya Sai Baba literally and miraculously transformed his male genitals into female ones on two separate occasions (imagine the look on the face of "Mr. British Citizen" if he read that). As if this is not shocking enough, Alaya Rahm wrote a love-poem to Sathya Sai Baba after allegedly being sexually abused dozens of times. Alaya even carried two scarves with him so that he could double his chances of having an interview with Sai Baba. Is this the behavior of someone who was being "seriously sexually abused"?

Even though Barry Pittard (an Anti-Sai Activist) stated "Well over a hundred sworn affidavits alleging sexual molestation of young males has been lodged with FBI", not even one single witness was identified to the court on Alaya Rahm's behalf. This highly suggests that Anti-Sai Activist's numbers about alleged victims are untrue, unsubstantiated and unverifiable. This single fact alone wholly compromises and changes the entire face of the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba.

In conclusion, this once again goes to show that all of these Anti-Sai articles have an Anti-Sai agenda behind them. Although Paul Lewis was working in collaboration with Anti-Sai Activists for six months, the end result is that he could not provide any new information against Sathya Sai Baba. Paul Lewis attempted to re-packaged old allegations and old claims and pass it off as something new.

Six months of research later, Paul Lewis could not write about any confirmed cases of "pedophilia". Rather, Lewis wrote about "claims of pedophilia". Surely, if there was proof or legitimate complaints of "pedophilia" against Sathya Sai Baba, Lewis (a journalist for the "esteemed" Guardian newspaper) would have found it. He didn't find anything. Nothing. Why not? With all these rampant claims of "pedophilia", surely there must have been at leastone case or story he could cite. No cases and no stories were cited. Period.

In the past 6 years, those opposing Sathya Sai Baba have failed to make any leeway against him in a court of law for alleged acts of sexual impropriety. This highly suggests that the "evidence" against Sathya Sai Baba is inadequate or non-existent.

Because Anti-Sai Activist have no proof against Sathya Sai Baba, they wage an internet smear campaign and attempt to feed questionable stories to the media by banding together and employing group thuggery tactics. Any sincere inquiry into this issue will clearly reveal that the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba are based on rumors, second/third hand accounts, anonymous individuals and the like.

Thankfully, Sanjay has a big mouth, can't keep secrets and let it slip out that Anti-Sai Activists were behind The Guardian's newspaper article. Who knows what other secrets lay behind the other "exposures" against Sai Baba? As one can see, the modus operandi of Anti-Sai Activists is one of subterfuge, deceit and secrecy. In the past, those who accused Anti-Sai Activists of behaving this way were dismissed as "paranoid" or resorting to "ad hominem" attacks. All along, Sai Devotees and Pro-Sai Activists were right. Anti-Sai Activists are deceitful propagandists who operate behind-the-scenes, resorting to secrecy and subterfuge to push their public hate-campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba. The truth is now out and there is no stopping it.

Related Blogs - Exposing The Exposers

Friday, September 29, 2006

Psychopathy, Psychopaths & Psychopathic Behavior

Sanjay Kishore DadlaniMiddlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay poorly attempted to profile me as a "psychopath" on his blog. Sanjay (in the past) also attempted to profile Sathya Sai Baba and Lisa as "schizophrenic". First and foremost, Sanjay does not possess any credentials as a doctor, therapist or medical practitioner. Therefore, Sanjay's opinions and assessments are those of a layman. I see no reason why I shouldn't subject Sanjay to the same profiling he subjects others to. Let us take a look at psychopaths and how Sanjay fits the profile of one:

REFERENCE:Hare's PCL-R 20-item checklist is based on Cleckley's 16-item checklist, and the following is a discussion of the concepts in the PCL-R:

REFERENCE:The PCL-R can be reduced to two stable factors (some evidence for three factors but unstable at this point). Factor 1--comprises the affective and interpersonal style of the individual and includes such items as superficial charm, grandiosity, lying and manipulativeness, affective shallowness, absence of remorse, and lack of empathy. Items loading on Factor 1

- 01. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM -- the tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Psychopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A psychopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example.Reference:

Also evidenced by 4,349 posts under the name "saiexposed420" (Ref); 1,132 posts under the name "dark_knight_9" (Ref); 571 posts under the name "innitball" (Ref); 170 posts under the name "sai-charan.geo" (Ref); 29 posts under the name "donmakaveli22" (Ref). This totals 6,251 posts made in 55 months. This results in a daily average of 3.8 messages made every day for 4 years and 7 months! These are Sanjay's postings made exclusively on this single Yahoo Group, which does not account for Sanjay's numerous other posts on groups, forums, blogs, boards, etc. Therefore, it is abundantly clear that Sanjay is a slick and verbally facile person. Sanjay is also well-known for his weasel-like way of explaining away anything and everything in his typical wordy and garrulous replies. Sanjay never shuts up and has a compulsive need to always have the last word. Sanjay is a first-class deceiver, twister, misrepresenter and inaccurate-paraphraser. Despite professing to be a devotee of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and Lord Krishna, Sanjay is not afraid or shy to use profanity, sexually explicit language or loosely defame others without remorse. Therefore, Sajay exhibits a psychopath's glibness and superficial charm.

- 02. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH -- a grossly inflated view of one's abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings.Reference:

There is no doubt that Sanjay is highly opinionated, arrogant, cocky and a braggart. Sanjay believes he is superior to others, speaks condescendingly to others, unremittingly attempts to invalidate others and attempts to situate himself as being superior to others by calling his opponents "stupid", "idiots", "bitches", "sluts", "morons", "faggots", "hypocritical schmucks", "arseholes", "scumballs", "liars", "demented", "psychotic", "sick twisted shitty pieces of SCUM", "dumbasses", "schizoids", "dumbfucks", "retards", "fools", etc. Sanjay arrogantly brags about his promiscuous sexual escapades and chronic drinking problems. Although Sanjay has divulged vast amounts of information about himself and his profound psychological problems, he unremittingly castigates others for faults he has fully conceded having himself. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's gradiose sense of self-worth.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:It is absolutely imperative that female visitors to this site fall in love with me - and fall in love with me, they will - and get it on. First I will have to woo them with my fun-loving and energetic personality. When I succeed in making them think what a great guy I am and how fantastic it would be to get with me ("I MUST have that boy!"), then I will have considered my mission a success. What a complete studmuffin I am. Who can resist me?

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:So it seems that most of the time I just like to pose as some big pundit and throw my weight around like some big know-it-all. Sometimes I think it is unfair to label someone as a know-it-all, especially when that is ultimately an admirable quality, knowing so much about Krishna or Gaura-lila.

- 04. PATHOLOGICAL LYING -- can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest.Reference:

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:I knew sadhus in India who have lived to be over 300 years old.

- 05. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS -- the use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one's victims.Reference:

Also, see Point 04. Sanjay is notorious for his use of deceit and deception against Sathya Sai Baba, devotees and proponents. Even when Sanjay was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, he resorted to deceit and deception to slur and defame his opponents (Reference). Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's tendency to be conning and manipulative.

- 06. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT -- a lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one's victims.Reference:

Although Sanjay hypocritically claims he is sympathetic with alleged victims of sexual abuse, he made fun of the sexual abuse endured by Lisa and said "It was just a cheap ploy to gain attention and sympathy. That's right, isn't it?" Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's lack of remorse or guilt.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Friday, September 16, 2005; Title: "Birthday Blues":Anyway fuck 'em all...It's almost like my entire soul seems to be filled with poison. I don't know how else to describe it. I either feel just very vacant or empty, and at other times I just feel consumed by bitterness, anger and hatred. Consumed by poison. It's like when I close my eyes, I can actually feel the loneliness surrounding me, choking and suffocating me. Or at least my senses seem to sink within myself and become dull. A pessimistic attitude tints my vision and I cannot seem to understand other people's emotions except mine. Yes, I may laugh at comedies but usually only at the sarcastic jokes, which seem to be an extension of the frustration and bitterness in my soul...I guess I can just envision myself hooking up with some cute little bitch and then messing up her head in the worst way possible, leaving her all fucked-up and broken-hearted. That's almost satanic and is something that I could normally never do, but these days I just don't seem to care. Am I becoming evil? Yes I am, and I think it's way overdue. WAY overdue. People have been evil to me so it's justice when they get the same shit done to them. And fuck all of that shit about karma and endless continuing cycles. I ain't got time for that nonviolent bollocks. I really shouldn't be here, but I am and I just have to do anything to survive. So everyone can go FUCK themselves...Seems that all people are essentially fucking selfish self-interested arseholes who do not have the capability of reaching out to other people and feeling their pain because they're so FUCKING SELF-ABSORBED AND WRAPPED UP IN THEIR OWN.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Thursday, July 28, 2005; Title: "more crap"?She's probably immersed in her own problems and fucking insecurities, stupid insecurities which never meant shit to me and which she always made a big issue about. IT DIDN'T MATTER- NONE OF IT EVER MATTERED TO ME, but she just didn't get it.

- 07. SHALLOW AFFECT -- emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.Reference:

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Friday, September 16, 2005; Title: "Birthday Blues":It's almost like my entire soul seems to be filled with poison. I don't know how else to describe it. I either feel just very vacant or empty, and at other times I just feel consumed by bitterness, anger and hatred. Consumed by poison. It's like when I close my eyes, I can actually feel the loneliness surrounding me, choking and suffocating me. Or at least my senses seem to sink within myself and become dull. A pessimistic attitude tints my vision and I cannot seem to understand other people's emotions except mine.

- 08. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY -- a lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.Reference:

Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's callousness and lack of empathy.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Friday, September 16, 2005; Title: "Birthday Blues":Anyway fuck 'em all...It's almost like my entire soul seems to be filled with poison. I don't know how else to describe it. I either feel just very vacant or empty, and at other times I just feel consumed by bitterness, anger and hatred. Ever since SHE left, anyway. Consumed by poison. It's like when I close my eyes, I can actually feel the loneliness surrounding me, choking and suffocating me. Or at least my senses seem to sink within myself and become dull. A pessimistic attitude tints my vision and I cannot seem to understand other people's emotions except mine.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Friday, October 07, 2005; Title: "Anger":The more she leaves it, the more angry and tense I'm getting. This crap needs to be resolved. Fucking bitches, they owe me something. And every day that passes ain't helping their fucking case. Oh boy, am I getting madder and madder by the day. Oh boy, am I gonna burn them alive or what? They all fucking try this shit with me. As if I'sm some kinda lame dog or something that'll let it go. Ooh, hell no! I am NOT gonna be letting this shit go, especially from fucking nervous cowards who ain't even got the guts to come and face me.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Friday, October 07, 2005; Title: "Update":I took a bottle of whisky coz I thought it'd be fun to have a drink as well as put us in the mood and all that. Throwing away your inhibitions and all that shit. And frankly, because she's not that much of a looker, I figure I'd need it. Harsh I agree, but hey, that's just the way it goes. I really don't give a shit no more.

- 16. FAILURE TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR OWN ACTIONS -- a failure to accept responsibility for one's actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial.Reference:

No matter what happens, it's never Sanjay's fault. Sanjay ceaselessly lives in denial, plays the victim, constantly justifies his actions by whining and throwing hissy fits, engages in blame mentality and accuses others for his negative experiences and bleak outlooks on life. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopaths failure to accept responsibility for his own actions.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Tuesday, August 23, 2005; Title: "A Shit Life":There's not much point in being nice to people when you get sweet FA in return. And if things are like that in your own blood, then what is there to say about friends? THERE AIN'T NO FRIENDS! It's the fucking same everywhere, no one cares about you really and they all wanna just use you for something. And "love" dosn't exist either; it's all a crock of marketing shit created by Hallmark to sell cards.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Tuesday, August 23, 2005; Title: "Sadness":Overwhelming despair welling up deep in my heart. No recourse to turn to, no one to hold. Tears of sadness flow from my eyes as I weep in the darkness for release. No one hears the bitter sobs as I cry for a saviour to liberate my soul from this gutter. The chains of iniquity lie around my neck and my hands are tied together with the rope of regret while the children outside laugh and play in joyful glee. I close my eyes and feel the waves of misery crash on the rocks of my heart and sway my body to the rhythm of the vulture's call.

Factor 2--comprises the more behavioral aspects of psychopathy and includes items describing an impulsive, antisocial lifestyle including early behavior problems, juvenie delinquency, aggressive behavior, proneness to boredom, absence of planning, and irresponsibility as an adult. The characteristics of APD reflect mainly this second factor of the PCL-R. Items loading on Factor 2

- 03. NEED FOR STIMULATION or PRONENESS TO BOREDOM -- an excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Psychopaths often have a low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine:This entire article is proof that Sanjay suffers from a compulsive need for stimulation and is prone to boredom. Sanjay loves the thrill of the fight and his numerous (and extremely verbose) posts on the internet show he has lots of time on his hands to widdle away. Sanjay's StreetBitches Blog also proves that he needs stimulation and is willing to break the law to get off on his cheap, thrilling and risky behavior. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's need for stimulation and proneness to boredom.

- 09. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE -- an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities:At the age of 28, Sanjay still lives at home with his parents and leeches off of them (indicating an intentional, manipulative, selfish and exploitive financial dependence on them). Sanjay also whined about not receiving gifts on his birthday or at Christmas (which his Hare Krishna family does not celebrate). When terrorist bombings occurred in London, all Sanjay could think about was himself, his groin and his love life (Reference). Sanjay is unusually egocentric, self-focused and can only think of what should benefit him. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's parasitic lifestyle.

- 10. POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS -- expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily:On the page that lists most of my exposures about Sanjay (Reference), one can see all the signs of his irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse. This type of verbal abuse has been specifically discussed on Tapati And Her Sanjay-Repercussions and evidenced on the following small sampling of Yahoo Posts: 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 06; 07; 08; 09; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22; 23. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's poor behavior controls.

- 12. EARLY BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS -- a variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home:See: The Aghori Vimalananda Lie (where Sanjay claimed being sexually active at 7 year of age and had sex for a quick lay in the guise of spirituality). Sanjay suffers from hysterical deafness since the age of 5 and claimed he was abused (sexually?) in the Hare Krishnas as a child. This may be the root cause for Sanjay's pathological lying, bullying, drinking problems and promiscuous sexual behavior. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's early behavioral problems.

- 13. LACK OF REALISTIC, LONG-TERM GOALS -- an inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life:On his former Killuminati Blog (Saturday, October 22, 2005; Title: "A Change of Direction?"), Sanjay said: "It is no wonder that I have started to feel full of rage, hate and anger. It is no wonder that I have started to seriously contemplate on and accept the possibility of the darker forces in life. It is no wonder that I have started to set my sights on the lower and fringe sections of society. It is no wonder that I read 'The Satanic Bible' by Anton Szandor LaVey. It is no wonder that I have started to lose my motivation and risk the future of several important life-projects that I am currently undertaking." Not only this, but Sanjay also talked about his overwhelming despair in life and his desire to cut his flesh with razors and blow out his brains with a gun after licking the barrel with his tongue (Reference). Sanjay fully condeded he suffers from depression (Reference) and is full of anger, hatred, poison and bitterness (Reference). Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's lack of realistic, long-term goals.

- 14. IMPULSIVITY -- the occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless:Sanjay's former Killuminiti Blog, StreetBitches Blog, requests for Jesus, Disney & Biblical Pornography, views on Child And Teen Porn, lies about being a porn investigator and working for the IWF all point to the occurance of behaviors that not only lack reflection and consideration of consequences, they are also foolhardy, rash, erratic and reckless. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's impulsivity.

- 15. IRRESPONSIBILITY -- repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements:See the following quote. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's irresponsibility.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Saturday, October 22, 2005; Title: "A Change of Direction?":It is thus no wonder that I am wallowing in disillusion these days. It is no wonder that I have accepted the possibility that I will transform into a sad, lonely, bitter twisted old man. It is no wonder that I have started to feel full of rage, hate and anger. It is no wonder that I have started to seriously contemplate on and accept the possibility of the darker forces in life. It is no wonder that I have started to set my sights on the lower and fringe sections of society. It is no wonder that I read 'The Satanic Bible' by Anton Szandor LaVey. It is no wonder that I have started to lose my motivation and risk the future of several important life-projects that I am currently undertaking. It is no wonder that, to appease my tortured soul, I listen to metal. Not just any metal, mind you, Motorhead and a little Metallica is the stuff that oils my wheels these days. Regarding my taking a turn for all of this negativity, what else is there?

- 18. JUVENILE DELINQUENCY -- behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness:See The Aghori Vimalananda Lie (where Sanjay claimed being sexually active at 7 year of age and had sex for a quick lay in the guise of spirituality).

- 19. REVOCATION OF CONDITION RELEASE -- a revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear:Unknown at this time.

Items that do not load on either factor:

- 17. MANY SHORT-TERM MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS -- a lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital:See Point 11. Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's many short-term relationships.

- 20. CRIMINAL VERSATILITY -- a diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes.Reference:

Sanjay unapologetically takes great pride in his crimes of defamation, purchase of illegal street drugs, receipt of illegal child pornography and the sexual exploitation of innocent teenagers, mothers and Middlesex University students. Sanjay lied about working for the IWF as an child porn investigator (a claim subsequently proven to be a bold-faced lie) and fully conceded that he received illegal child pornography (a claim he later retracted). Therefore, Sanjay exhibits a psychopath's criminal versatility.

- 11. PROMISCUOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR -- a variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.Reference:

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Tuesday, May 25, 2004; Title: "Trains Jesus Girls Sex Rant":YES ALRIGHT! It should be obvious to you by now that I get off on three main things about women: Long hair, strappy shoes and knee-high boots. Miniskirts are always good, though it doesn't turn me on that much as it did in my teenage days. Man, those days, I would have shagged anything that moved. I remember some guy told me a funny motto: "If it moves, fuck it; if it doesn't, fuck it till it does!"

Well, gimme a break. If I didn't get turned on by external things then I may as well cut off my penis. Of course I'm not shallow enough not to hang out with women if they are not that pretty or if they're not wearing the right things. Of course personality counts for a lot, but come on, anyone gotta agree with me that its so much better if the female you're with is adorned (yes, adorned) with boots that reach right up to your knee. Who knows why it is so sexy? It just is! And I wouldn't wanna take 'em off either. The best sex anybody can ever have is kinky. Slightly kinky or mega-kinky, whichever works for you. But you need that little bit of chili sauce to spice up the meal. Reminds me of that sex scene in 'Frankie & Johnny' when Al Pacino fucked Michelle Pfeiffer's waitress friend, I distinctly remember that line when the friend told Michelle "I even kept my pumps on!" Stupid Pacino, he wasn't turned on by those pumps, the lame fucker. He's actually one of my favourite actors (the other being Jack Nicholson) but it really pissed me off that he wasn't turned on by a woman who kept her shoes on in bed. If you just happen to like straight man-on-top missionary sex, good luck matey, next stop Boredom City. You'll meet Al Pacino there, tell him I say 'hi'.

Boots are great, they confer automatic sexiness on whoever wears them. A girl who wears boots has got Goddess Status. Just try it out and see girls, put on a pair of boots and see how many guys have their tongues hanging out licking the dirty pavement behind you, all willing to be your slave. Not that I'm like that, oh no, I can control myself, heh.

But eh, its one of my fetishes so sue me. Strappy shoes are cool too but they are so last year. It was fun when just a few women were wearing them but it got a bit boring when everybody and anybody had strappy shoes. Otherwise seriously, some girls I totally RUINED them when they wore strappies in bed. God, they look so amazing and so horny. I'm not into feet, I'm into the shoes. The way the designer made these shoes so that they swirl perfectly around a girl's ankles is just PURE ECSTASY. Sometimes you come across a picture of a porn star (like Sylvia Saint, cough cough) or some other woman wearing these high-heels with straps that swirl themselves all the way up the girl's calves: Paradise. Last summer I was seriously into strappy shoes - I would have been anybody's slave if they wore strappy shoes - until the summer ended and everyone started wearing knee-high boots instead, ostensibly to cover up their legs.

What does that mean for me, though? Does it mean that my fetishes are according to the latest fashion? Are they permanent or temporary? Are some of them permanent and some others temporary? Who knows? Time will tell I guess. The Permanency of People's Sexual Kinks - that would make an interesting psychological study, I'll say! Probably even better than the Hite Report. But then the Hite Report(s) was simply a study into sexual behaviour and not a study of the psychology behind it per se. All I know is that I was around 12 years old when I first became aware of sex and its appendages. My earliest fantasies used to revolve around licking pussy - I was seriously into that then, too - and I know for a fact that I ain't THAT much into it now. Yes, you heard. My idea of having sex in those days was simply to go down on a girl and make her scream. Lucky girls eh. These days, muff-diving well, I'll do it but I ain't keen on it. Sorry. When I finally lost my virginity, it was to a girl who initially refused to do anything except suck dick, so I guess I was into that for a while. Who doesn't like a girl who sucks dick anyway? It was not like I had any choice though.

Later I did other things with this girl and that became fun, but the memory of those earliest oral pleasures have always stayed with me. She was a girl who had her own house and whose boyfriend was away for long periods. It was fun to go around to her house and fuck her while she was washing the dishes, she only lived up the road. The kitchen is such an inventive place to fuck; all sorts of positions can be got into and all sortsa things can be played with. This reminds me of a fantasy I had about two years ago. Picture this: a woman in the kitchen, doing whatever she's doing - cooking, making tea, whatever - and engrossed in that activity, completely naked except for high-heeled strappy shoes. Nothing too kinky about that, sorry to disappoint. But this fantasy didn't turn out to be REAL for you did it?! ;) And that girl constantly teased me about it by muttering "Clack clack" under her breath every time she saw me. It turned me on every time.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Friday, May 28, 2004; Title: "Rock Pick Up":As I looked in the direction of the oncoming buses, I spotted two faces in the crowd. Hot damn, two rock chicks were coming. At least, I guessed they were rockbirds judging from their clothes and hair. One of them had dyed their hair in that EXCELLENT black-dye with a red tinge. Although I'm a fan of the bluish tinge myself, it didn't look so bad. She was accompanied by a blonde friend who looked like a cross-between Melinda Messenger and Danii Minogue. Weird concept, but she looked nice. :) And as I was looking in their direction, they were looking in mine. In fact, the reddish one checked me out a total of three times before they both passed by behind me. Oh man, I had to do it, I had to turn my head around and check out their butts, I couldn't help myself. Sure enough, the reddish one had a cute TIGHT booty that looked like it was about to spill out of her pants - LUSH! Before I could check out the blonde one, she had already turned back to check me out. She realised that I was checking them both out and laughed to her reddish friend. And turned back.

I had to do it, I had to talk to them. Rock chicks are my latest muse these days, making me go weak at the knees. The little conversation was so hilarious. Here is the gist of it:

Me: Hi.Both: Hi.Me: Where you guys from?Both: [Answer unclear, but who gives a crap? ;)]Me: Oh right, sorry about looking like that, you guys were so pretty it's hard not to.Blonde: Do you want to fuck us both?

MY GOD! What were they on?

Me: Yeah alright, why not? Right now?Reddish: No not now, but we are going to Fabric tomorrow night or Saturday, you wanna come?Me: Oh yeah I know that place very well. Go there all the time.Blonde: Well ok, here is my number.

[Number swaps take place]

[Goodbyes]

What can I say? Rock chicks, umm.. ROCK!

It's gotta be the Jesus look, I swear. Too many ladies have been passing me stares ever since the Jesus thing started.

Jesus, I love you so much man. You know I been a bad boy at times, but you ROCK! Your look is massive, I love it!

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Tuesday, June 01, 2004; Title: "ROCK ON!!"?:Remember those rock chicks I met on the street the other day? Well, the plan was to go on a date on Saturday night, but it got cancelled for reasons best known only to them. Still, they mentioned that they'd be having a party at their place in Kingsbury today (Bank Holiday Monday) and gave me directions and further info.

I was all set. I was looking forward to it. I never been with rock girls before and all sorts of thoughts flooded my mind. Are they kinky? Are they into whips and chains? Are they gonna play metal there? What they gonna be wearing? How nasty can they get usually? My mind was a blur.

Well never mind. To cut a long story short, I got there, did the business, went home.

And I was right, by the way, the girl with the reddish-tinge black hair dye was pure juice.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Wednesday, July 20, 2005; Title: "Return Of The BLOG!":The ex before the ex, Bhavna, really and shittily screwed me up so bad that I'm almost burnt for life.

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Killuminati Blog; Tuesday, October 04, 2005; Title: "Shalene":Why is it that this fucking shit happens to me EVERY time? Usually I treat girls like the fucking sluts that they ARE, but the very moment I actually start to believe that someone among them can be a ittle different; warm, honest, loving, trusting and all of that shit, and I actually start beliving in that love shit in that a so as I start to IDEALISE them and hold them as "perfect" in my mind, they somehow fall down and the whole thing goes to shit. I mean sometimes I wonder if the jinx is in me; maybe my association causes other people to become deviants or so form an accepted moral code. But, in any case, just look at the lame horny sluts that I have after me; there's Redhead Anna, there's Miss PAraguay and so many promiscuous fuck swho if I'd sleep with I'd probably pick up some unknown STD. So why should I keep crying over HER and miss HER when I have so many fucking SLUTS to enjoy with?

Quotable Quotes From Sanjay Dadlani:Istagosthi.org forum; September 2003:When I was receiving my Aghora training, I was taught to visualise myself as Shiva and my partner as Shakti, and thus our "union" was in fact divine. So anyway I learnt all of these sexual tricks ansd may other Ahori rites of passage that are in fact extremely valuable to the spiritual aspirant who can be follwing ANY spiritual path. There are certain principles that are the common basis of all religions and spiritual paths, and I learnt these. Was I interested in Aghora to reach Maa, or wa smy devotion false and did I just want a quick lay in the guise of spirituality? Reflectively, it was obviously the latter in not so many words.

Pretty shocking and scary? Huh? This is the mentally disturbed person who is attempting to expose Sathya Sai Baba and who has received the full support and promotion of Anti-Sai Sites. The tide has turned and Anti-Sai Activists (writhing their fingers out of sheer desperation) are utilizing all the malefic forces they can muster against Sathya Sai Baba. Their foulest force is Sanjay Dadlani and now they must suffer the stain of disgrace by keeping his association.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Sanjay's Requests For Pornographic Material

It's True: Dadlani Did Request Perverse Sexual Pictures:Sanjay Kishore Dadlani has tried to trivialize requests he made for perverse, deviant and pornographic Biblical, Jesus and Disney pictures in 2001, in the alternative sex section in Google's adult groups. Strangely enough, Dadlani has fully admitted that he did, in fact, request these pornographic images.

Admittedly, at one time I was curious to hear of a newsgroup entitled 'alt.sex.jesus' as well as a couple of others, and attempted to find out for myself what sort of material was posted there.

Click Here to read a post where Dadlani contradicted the above two posts by claiming the reasons he visited these perverse sex sites were because:

I wanted to see if child porn or other forms of illegal porn were being transmitted in that group...No. This is why I asked for such pics, so that I could judge for myself if they were porn or innocent pics.

In this post, Dadlani clearly stated that he was looking for porn to see if it was being transmitted in these groups. This is amusing considering that the groups he was looking for porn on were adult categories that were specifically about sex (view screencaps below)! Now why would people be posting "innocent pics" in adult groups that require you to be 18 years of age or older, whose categories specifically are listed under "sex" listings?

Click Here to read another contradictory confession where Dadlani said:

I never received any pics the first time I posted. This is why I joined a thread to ask for "more" pics, and I never received those either! I never SENT or RECEIVED any pics! I was doing my JOB for the IWF!

Previously, Dadlani said that he joined these groups because he was "curious" about the content in those groups and that is why he went there. Now, however, Dadlani is saying that the reason he joined these groups was because he worked for the IWF. However, the IWF said that Dadlani never worked for them! Even if Dadlani worked for the IWF (turns out he wasn't), one must remember that Dadlani was perusing sex listings in alternative sexual groups whose specific purpose was for pornography! Now why would Dadlani try to be finding illegal porn in pornography groups? It is clear that Sanjay does not regard child pornography as being anything particularly harmful or egregious. This was confirmed when Sanjay said, "Because even if it is true that I saw child porn, so what? It's just a picture?" (Reference) I guess a picture of a child being sexually abused negates the criminal act of sexual abuse that resulted in that picture being taken in the first place? Sanjay also believes that teenage porn is "relatively legal" (Reference). Of course, the ramification of this comment is that teenage consent is "relatively legal" and SSB would not be guilty of breaking any laws, since the youngest alleged victim was 15/16 years old (and no sex was involved in his allegation anyway). The only types of porn that are illegal are child and teen porn. As sick as it may seem, Jesus, Biblical and Disney porn are not illegal. The only time Dadlani opens his mouth is put his other foot in. In this same post, dated Feb 4th 2003, Dadlani said he was going to file a court case against Lisa. Nothing has ever been done. I wonder why?

Now for the clincher. The reason why Sanjay contradicted himself so many times is because he actually fabricated the entire story about working for the IWF and receiving illegal porn when he worked for them! That's right, Sanjay lied (Refs: 01; 02; 03; 04; 05). The quotes read:

"The point, retard, is that your information is all false. You base your case on my own false confession which is truly laughable,"; "The fact is that this false confession of mine is not evidence that I viewed/view child porn...I KNOW it was a lie, you stupid fool. What exactly is your point here? It was a STORY that you FELL for"; "But stupid muck-raking pigs that you are, you mailed IWF to get nothing but a confirmation that my story was false when it was patently false in the first place"; "She says i am on record saying I received child porn, but I have already stated ON THE RECORD that that entire story was a complete fabrication" and "You base your case on my own false confession which is trulylaughable".

Needless to say, it was Sanjay's fabrications (wrought from the metal of his "honesty") that were responsible for the accusations that he received and viewed illegal child pornography. Once Sanjay was cornered, regarding his changing stories, Sanjay claimed his receipt of illegal porn and working for the IWF were a "story" (Sanjay's synonym for "lying"). One can certainly reason that taking the fall for a lie is less damaging than taking the fall for viewing illegal child porn. Since Sanjay has difficulty telling the truth, he might have weighed his options (as meager as they were) and lied again to escape his admission of engaging in illegal activity.

Despite Dadlani's ceaseless equivocation and subterfuge, regarding these pornographic images and why he requested them, Dadlani has the audacity to say I did not research any of this information for myself! The fact remains that despite Dadlani's excuses and bloated responses, he requested pornographic material. And not just any "pornographic material"! Biblical, Jesus and Disney "pornographic material"! This is the same man who is trying to hold SSB accountable for allegations of sexual abuse and to whom he ceaselessly refers to as a "faggot". It is of little wonder that Dadlani's Anti-Sai buddies are not rushing to his side to support him in any way. The reality is that Dadlani is a liability to the integrity of the Anti-Sai movement and is nothing more than a disgrace to Anti-Sais and the Hare Krsna / Sri Caitanya movement, whose tenets he professes to follow.

The following images are provided as proof that Dadlani requested perverse and deviant images of Jesus (of all people), the Bible and Disney characters. The facts speak for themselves.

References:Click Here to view the Google Group results for Dadlani's name "X Zecutioner" (look for: "alt.sex.jesus", "alt.sex.biblical" and "alt.sex.disney" on Page Two). Click Here to view the Google Groups results for Dadlani's email "dark_knight_9@yahoo.com" (look for: "alt.sex.jesus", "alt.sex.biblical" and "alt.sex.disney" on Page Two). One does not need to be 18 years of age or older to view these results. However, if one chooses to see Dadlani's actual posts, one must confirm that they are at least 18 years of age. This section contains adult content.

Preface: It is important to point out that people cannot post pornographic images on these Google Groups (there isn't even an uploading facility that allows one to do it). The way that people get the pornographic material they seek is by making a request and having that request filled through a private email correspondence. These groups provide emails (which are clearly shown) for people to correspond with each other. One can also join the group and get pornographic links via email. Dadlani has tried to argue that since there are no visible, pornographic images in these groups he didn't see or get any. Of course, that isn't the way it works. Consequently, Dadlani is not entirely free from the suspicion that he obtained the material he sought.

Below: Google disclaimer that is shown before entering any Alternative Sex Groups (alt.sex), clearly stating it is intended for adults 18 years of age or older.

Below: The alt.sex.biblical section and other clearly pornographic categories.

Below: The alt.sex.jesus section and other clearly pornographic categories.

Below: Dadlani (using the name "X Zecutioner") made this post in a non-sexual, Vaishnava group in which he praised Sri Caitanya, to whom he has professed devotion on other Vaishnavite sites. Provided as proof that Sanjay used the name "X Zecutioner").

Below: The alt.sex.biblical section where Dadlani, using the name "X Zecutioner", requested Biblical sex pictures. Notice the comment, "REQ: more pics of biblical".

Below: The alt.sex.biblical section where Dadlani, using the name "X Zecutioner", started the thread asking for Biblical sex pictures. The comment reads, "biblical".

Below: The alt.sex.biblical section where Dadlani, using the name "X Zecutioner", requested Biblical sex pictures. Notice the comment, "what happened to the good pics of biblical".

Below: The alt.sex.jesus section where Dadlani, using the name "X Zecutioner", requested Jesus sex pictures. Notice the comment, "Naughty jesus".

Below: The alt.sex.jesus section where Dadlani, using the name "X Zecutioner", requested Jesus sex pictures. Dadlani started this thread. The comment reads "jesus".

Below: A post taken from the alt.sex.jesus section where someone clearly states what these pics are being used for.

Below: The alt.sex.disney section where Dadlani, using the name "X Zecutioner", requested Disney sex pictures. Notice the comment, "alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.disney or whatever, where we are supposed to find Disney pictures, the forum does not exist". Once again, Dadlani started this thread.

Below: Dadlani's Killuminati108 photo album on Yahoo. Notice how Dadlani names this folder "Jesus" and names pictures of himself "purplejez" (short for "purple jesus"). Does Dadlani have a Jesus fetish? Indeed he does. This photo album can no longer be viewed online. Sanjay publicly claimed that the reason his Yahoo pictures are no longer online is because of the following: "Don't blame me if Yahoo decide to modify their policies and make Photo folders available to the public only if the Yahoo user has paid for premium access. But you wouldn't care about that do you?" (Reference) To find out of this were true, I made my own photo album. I've never paid for "premium access" and mine is showing (Click). Sanjay publicly lied again!

In Conclusion...It is nothing less than shameful that Sanjay Dadlani would request such type of images from an adult alternative sex section in Google's Groups. Sanjay said he "rejected the pseudo-guru (SSB) in July 2001". Sanjay rejected Sathya Sai Baba after accepting Gaudiya Vaishnavism as being "topmost". After accepting Gaudiya Vaishnavism, 6 months later, Dadlani is in alternative sex sites requesting pornographic images of Jesus, the Bible and Disney characters! Hare Krsna! This is not surprising considering Sanjay's preoccupation with fictional cartoon characters, which resulted in his He-Man Inspired God Concept.

One must remember that Dadlani fully conceded that he requested these images out of curiosity. This is extremely troubling considering Dadlani's moral stance regarding allegations of sexual abuse against SSB. One can only conclude that Dadlani's morality is either lacking or he attempted to purge his inner demons by attempting to bring Jesus down into the gutter where his mind is at.

Don't let your children play with Sanjay Kishore Dadlani! He might steal their toys and cartoon magazines and fantasize about them in a sexual way.

Don't let Sanjay Kishore Dadlani into your churches! He might be sitting there looking all pious, but will probably be secretly lusting after Jesus on the cross.

Don't let Sanjay Kishore Dadlani look at your Bible! He might look for pictures in it so he can fulfill his perverted and deviant sexual desires.