The information on this blog about the corruption in America's courts will disgust and frighten you and propel you into a world of racketeering, greed, larceny, malicious prosecution, and outrageous disdain for due process, the Rule of Law, the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights and Professional Responsibility Standards, Rules and Statutes. This is the Unified Court System of New York State. You will be a victim unless you speak up and protest. by Betsy Combier

• Grant
received round-trip travel to Las Vegas on a private jet, a value of
$59,000.

• One
of the passengers on the jet was a prostitute who then stayed in Grant's room
and who spent the weekend in Las Vegas with Grant and his friends who
"took advantages of her services during the trip," according to
the indictment.

• Grant's
rooms and meals were comped during the trip.

Rome Trip, August 2013

• Grant
and his family enjoyed a two-night stay in two hotel rooms in Rome, a
value of $1,066.

Other Financial Benefits

• Grant
had the railings replaced outside of his Staten Island home, a value of
approximately $6,000.

• The
windows were replaced in Grant's home, which cost
approximately $6,000.

• Grant's
watch was upgraded, a value of approximately $3,000.

• On
Christmas Day in 2013, Grant received a video game system for his children
and a piece of jewelry for his wife, a value of approximately $1,000.

Deputy
Chief Michael Harrington

Chicago Trip, 2014

• Harrington
and family members stayed in a downtown Chicago hotel with three rooms for four
nights and one room for two nights, a cost of approximately $6,500.

Other Financial Benefits

• Between
May 2013 and November 2014, Harrington was taken to dinner at least
once or twice a week, typically at pricey Manhattan restaurants. The bill
generally ran between $400 and $500.

•
Harrington received tickets to numerous sporting events, including
two $400 tickets to the Brooklyn Nets in January 2014 and two $700 tickets
for the New York Rangers in May 2014.

• On
Christmas Day in 2013, Harrington received a video game system for his kids.

• For a
period of 15 months, Harrington's security company was hired to work at a
Manhattan school, receiving $5,000 per month for its services.

Sgt. David
Villanueva

Villanueva
received:

•
Thousands of dollars in bribes.

• Bottles
of liquor.

•
Limousine rides.

•
A limousine tour of wineries.

Officer
Richard Ochetal

• Ochetal
received cash and benefits.

3 New York Police Commanders Are Arrested on Corruption Charges

ThreeNew York Police Departmentcommanders, including a deputy chief,
were arrested early Monday, along with a Brooklyn businessman, on federal
corruption charges stemming from one of several continuing investigations into
MayorBill de
Blasio’s campaign fund-raising, according to people with knowledge
of the matter.

The arrests, of a deputy
chief, a deputy inspector and a sergeant, were one of the most significant
roundups of police supervisors in the recent history of the department. In
striking the top ranks, the case is a particular blow to the storied — and sometimes
sullied — reputation of the nation’s largest municipal police force.

The charges detail lavish
gifts the two senior police officials are accused of receiving: complimentary
Super Bowl tickets, expensive meals and free overseas trips, including at least
one taken in the company of a prostitute, the people said. The sergeant was
charged in a scheme that involved aiding applicants for firearms licenses.

The gifts were largely paid
for by two businessmen, both of whom have been generous supporters of the mayor.
Jeremiah Reichberg, 42, of Borough Park, Brooklyn, was charged along with the
officers, the people said. Jona S. Rechnitz, 33, of the Upper West Side, had
been a target of the fund-raising investigation until recent weeks, when he
pleaded guilty to corruption charges and begancooperating with the federal authorities, the
people said.

The
arrests in the early morning hours by agents with the F.B.I. and investigators
from the Police Department’s Internal Affairs Bureau were followed by the
execution of search warrants, the people said. The charges included bribery,
honest services wire fraud and conspiracy, and they were scheduled to be
announced at a news conference later on Monday.

Arrested were Deputy Chief
Michael J. Harrington, 50; Deputy Inspector James M. Grant, 43; and Sgt. David
Villanueva, 42. They were expected to appear in United States District Court in
Manhattan on Monday afternoon. Their lawyers could not immediately be reached
for comment.

While the charges being leveled against the police officials
were uncovered during the fund-raising investigation focused on Mr. de Blasio,
a Democrat, and his inner circle, there has been no suggestion that the mayor
himself was involved in the conduct described in the charging documents in the
case, which are expected to be unsealed Monday morning. The fund-raising
investigation and several other inquiries by federal prosecutors, the F.B.I.
and other agencies focused on the mayor’s donors and fund-raising were
continuing. The scope of the broader fund-raising inquiries remains unclear.

Police Commissioner William
J. Bratton has said the department believes investigators have identified all
of the police officials involved in the alleged misconduct, though it is
unknown whether the charges on Monday will conclude that line of inquiry by
federal prosecutors, F.B.I. agents and Internal Affairs investigators.

The particular fund-raising
investigation that led to these arrests has been going on for well over a year,
and in recent months, details of some of the accusations against the police
officials who have been charged — and others — have been widely reported in
news accounts. Nearly a dozen mostly senior police officials have been
disciplined by the Police Department in some way as a result of the inquiry —
including some of those charged on Monday. Those disciplined include five
deputy chiefs and a deputy inspector; four of the chiefs and the deputy
inspector have put in for retirement.

Mr. Rechnitz’s cooperation
with federal prosecutors and F.B.I. agents has already helped prosecutors bring
corruption charges in another case linked to the same fund-raising
investigation, people briefed on the matter have said. In that case, a criminal
complaint unsealed on June 8 charged Norman Seabrook, the powerful head of the
union that represents city correction officers, and Murray Huberfeld, a hedge
fund financier, withhonest services fraud and conspiracy.

That complaint said Mr.
Rechnitz had pleaded guilty to committing honest services fraud in connection
with the scheme in which Mr. Seabrook and Mr. Huberfeld were charged, “among
other things,” suggesting he was involved in additional criminal conduct. While
the document does not identify Mr. Rechnitz by name, referring to him only as
CW-1, or Cooperating Witness 1, several people with knowledge of the matter
said CW-1 was Mr. Rechnitz. At a news conference announcing the arrests of Mr.
Seabrook and Mr. Huberfeld, Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the
Southern District of New York, whose office filed the complaint, would not
answer questions about the identity of CW-1 or the degree to which the witness
could be helpful in other cases.

But Mr. Bharara indicated
that the witness was “assisting other investigations.”

The criminal complaint in
the earlier case details two trips that Mr. Rechnitz, Mr. Seabrook and another
businessman — also a supporter of the mayor — took to the Dominican Republic.
On the first one, in November 2013, they were accompanied by an unnamed officer
from the Police Department. On the second one, in December 2014, the four men
were accompanied by a fifth unnamed person. Mr. Rechnitz paid for the airfare
for both trips.

Then, in March 2014, Mr.
Seabrook, Mr. Rechnitz, the police officer and the other businessman — Mr.
Reichberg, who was identified in the criminal complaint as Co-Conspirator 1 or
CC-1 — traveled to Israel, with Mr. Rechnitz paying the airfare, according to
the complaint. In July of that year, he paid for the same group to travel to
Las Vegas and then Burbank, Calif., the complaint said.

But with his arrest this week on corruption charges, it would appear that Mr. Seabrook’s reign is on the verge of collapse. On Thursday, he was ousted as union president and replaced for now by his second in command.

The biggest question is how this affects the efforts underway to reform the Rikers jail complex. The administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio has invested enormous political capital and hundreds of millions of dollars to remake New York City’s jails and to end the violence and corruption that has long plagued them.

Mr. Seabrook has been a fierce opponent of many of the changes being put in place at Rikers, particularly the scaling back of solitary confinement, which will soon be eliminated for all inmates under age 22.

But as the lone voice for the city’s 9,000 correction officers, his willingness to cooperate with at least some of the reform efforts was important. He was a strongman, but one who gave voice and coherence to a group of workers split among more than a dozen facilities and three shifts.

Among the rank-and-file, Mr. Seabrook commanded tremendous loyalty. Unlike the department officials and the commissioners who came and went, he was one of them, a correction officer born in the Bronx and raised poor as one of eight children. He was also a black man leading a heavily black union, sensitive to racial issues on the job and in the community.

At graduation ceremonies, new recruits would watch the droning speeches of officials with barely disguised boredom. When Mr. Seabrook took the stage — often to disparage those previous speakers to their faces — they were on their feet.

In those ways, his absence could pose headaches to reformers.

No matter how ambitious the reform agenda of Mr. de Blasio, a Democrat, may be, it can go nowhere without the support of the men and women who work the cellblocks.

With Mr. Seabrook gone, the question is, Who will speak for them now?

During his tenure as president, Mr. Seabrook quashed any potential challengers and never groomed a strong successor. His 14-member executive board is considered weak, commanding none of the loyalty among members that he has long enjoyed.

“Norman is a tyrant,” said William Valentin, who spent five years on the executive board and was kicked out by Mr. Seabrook in August 2015. “The executive board is pretty much under his control. They really don’t argue with him too much. Whatever he says goes.”

Understanding Mr. Seabrook’s outsized importance on the cellblocks requires understanding the history of the city’s Correction Department. By the end of the administration of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, a Republican turned political independent, there was a real power vacuum in the department. It was considered a low priority, and the commissioner at the time, Dora B. Schriro, was a weak leader.

Mr. Seabrook stepped into that void, his power perhaps reaching its apex in fall 2013, when he almost single-handedly shut down the city court system by directing his members in a work stoppage that halted almost all of the buses that ferry inmates to and from court.

A judge complained that the court system had been “held hostage,” and Mr. Bloomberg sued the union. But Mr. Seabrook emerged unscathed.

Even after Mr. de Blasio took office in 2014 and appointed the reform-minded Joseph Ponte as correction commissioner, Mr. Seabrook continued to behave as if he were in charge of Rikers. He called a news conference in which he derided Mr. Ponte as a “hug a thug” yokel from Maine who was out of his league.

Mr. de Blasio seemed to go out of his way early on in his administration to try to cultivate the union leader. During the height of the Ebola crisis in late 2014, for example, the mayor took a break from emergency preparations to attend a charity dinner hosted by Mr. Seabrook at a Bronx ballroom. In a speech, Mr. de Blasio described him as “a friend” and “a great leader in this town.”

But the landscape was changing. News organizations and city investigators were exposing a culture of pervasive brutality in the jails. Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, whose office filed charges against Mr. Seabrook on Wednesday, eventually joined a class-action lawsuit that led to intervention by a federal monitor. And the new mayor took an aggressive stance, vowing to remake Rikers.

Faced with constant obstruction by Mr. Seabrook, who often told his members that Rikers was “our house,” the administration sought ways to circumvent him. Perhaps the most important sign that the balance of power had shifted was a decision by Mr. Ponte to exclude Mr. Seabrook from a behind-the-scenes deal to significantly cut back on the use of solitary confinement. Mr. Seabrook stood at a public meeting and harshly criticized the administration, but the deal to end isolation for all inmates under 22 was done.

Mr. Seabrook continued to bluster publicly about the changes, once showing up outside City Hall with a coffin, meant to represent the dangers facing jail officers. But he also worked with the administration to improve training and to raise hiring standards.

Speaking about Mr. Seabrook’s arrest, Mr. de Blasio described his relationship with the union leader as “fraught.”

“Sometimes he was willing to work with us,” the mayor said. “Sometimes he wasn’t.”

Now there is great uncertainty about what comes next for the union.

Mr. Seabrook is set to run unopposed in unionwide elections this summer. Ballots have already been distributed to the membership, and for now, the plan is to let the election continue as scheduled, according to a union official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he did not have permission to discuss internal union business publicly.

If there are no challenges, the official said, the role of president will be fulfilled for the foreseeable future by Elias Husamudeen, Mr. Seabrook’s trusted second in command.

From Elias Husamudeen – President of COBA:"We are saddened and concerned by these allegations, but would point out that Mr. Seabrook is innocent of these charges until proven otherwise and we look forward to him having his day in court. But let’s be clear, the current leadership of COBA will remain focused on protecting the women and men in uniform who risk their lives working in our jails every day. Our officers face an increase in gang violence, an increase in encounters with the mentally ill that they are inadequately trained for, and an increase in overtime that is pushing them to the brink. These issues are too important to allow for distractions."

With brutality by guards at the Rikers Island jail complex rising at an alarming rate, the chief investigator for the New York City Correction Department stood before a roomful of senior officers and union leaders in the summer of 2012 and outlined her plans to crack down on abuse and send more cases to prosecutors.

Riker's Jail

The presentation infuriated one man in particular, Norman Seabrook, the powerful president of the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association, who believed the incidents should be handled internally. For the next two years he did everything in his power to get rid of the investigator, Florence Finkle. He helped scuttle some of her investigations, got one of her top people transferred, called for her resignation and denounced her on his weekly radio show.

In August, he finally got his wish: Ms. Finkle was forced out, replaced by a former senior Police Department official — a childhood friend of Mr. Seabrook’s.

Over his two decades as president of the union, Mr. Seabrook has come to exert extraordinary control over the Correction Department, consulting with commissioners on key appointments, forging alliances with high-ranking uniformed correction leaders and, more recently, speaking regularly with Mayor Bill de Blasio about department policy. His influence has paid enormous dividends for his members, but it has also fed a culture of violence and corruption at Rikers, an investigation by The New York Times found.

The investigation involved scores of interviews, with former correction commissioners, former senior City Hall aides, and current and former department officials, and reviews of internal emails and other documents, as well as several lengthy interviews with Mr. Seabrook himself. What emerged was a portrait of a labor leader who wields remarkable power through a combination of political savvy and intimidation.

“I came to think that my wardens believed Norman was more important to their career than I was,” said Martin F. Horn, who served as commissioner from 2003 to 2009.

Mr. Seabrook’s power has cut two ways.

Under his leadership, correction officers, long overlooked among the city’s uniformed services, have seen large gains in salary and pension benefits, reaching parity with firefighters and police officers. Like Mr. Seabrook, the overwhelming majority of his members are black. They have risen to dominate the top ranks of the department, making it far more diverse than the Police and Fire Departments, where most of the leadership is white.

But current and former city officials repeatedly described Mr. Seabrook as the biggest obstacle to efforts to curb brutality and malfeasance at Rikers. He has vigorously resisted stiffer penalties for the use of excessive force by guards and has fought stronger screening measures designed to stop correction officers from smuggling weapons and drugs into the jails. Time and again, Mr. Seabrook has shielded his members from serious punishment when investigators like Ms. Finkle have tried to go after them.

Last year, when prosecutors charged 10 officers in a beating that fractured an inmate’s nose and eye sockets, Mr. Seabrook vigorously defended them.

“Here we have correction officers paraded into court for merely defending themselves,” he said. “The officers did everything that they were supposed to do.”

Much of Mr. Seabrook’s influence within the department comes from a fear of what he might do to those who cross him. The Times spoke with about a dozen current and former senior city officials, both inside and outside the department, who have dealt with him regularly over the years and were privately critical of him. But almost no one would be quoted discussing Mr. Seabrook, citing concerns that he could sabotage their careers. Some also expressed fears about their safety while visiting Rikers, worrying that a correction officer might look the other way if an inmate suddenly got violent.

“He’s a bully,” said Daniel Dromm, a city councilman who has openly clashed with Mr. Seabrook on several occasions. “They’re afraid of him.”

3 New York City Correction Officials to Step Down Amid Scrutiny of Rikers

In a major shake-up at the New York City Correction Department, three high-ranking officials, including the top uniformed officer, are stepping down amid mounting criticism over the handling of violence and corruption at Rikers Island.

The chief of department, William Clemons, and two deputies — Joandrea Davis, the bureau chief of administration, and Gregory McLaughlin, the bureau chief of facility operations — are departing, correction officials said. The surprise departures came just five months after all three were appointed to their current posts by Mayor Bill de Blasio’s correction commissioner, Joseph Ponte.

A department spokesman said the changes were the result of “a restructuring” by Mr. Ponte in an effort to halt brutality on the most violent cellblocks.

The department has been under intense pressure from lawmakers and federal and city investigators to address systemic brutality and corruption at Rikers, the country’s second-largest jail complex. The United States attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York, which in August released a damning report detailing abuse of adolescent inmates at Rikers, has threatened to sue the city if changes are not made.

The highest-ranking official in the group, Mr. Clemons, is a 29-year veteran of the department. But he has been under scrutiny since an investigation by The New York Times in September uncovered details from an internal Correction Department audit that found he had “abdicated all responsibility” in his duties as warden of a juvenile facility at Rikers in 2011, where hundreds of inmate fights had been omitted from official statistics. The audit recommended that he be demoted.

Instead, he was promoted several times. And The Times found that large sections of the audit, including the recommendation for demotion and the sharpest criticism, were removed from the report by the previous commissioner, Dora B. Schriro.

Mr. Ponte has said he did not see the unedited version of the report before appointing Mr. Clemons chief of department in May. The commissioner promoted him over the objections of the city’s Department of Investigation, The Times found.

In a statement released on Tuesday morning, Mr. Ponte wrote that Mr. Clemons had “proved himself an able leader” and “was a model of stability in a tumultuous time.” Mr. Ponte said he would appoint a new chief by Dec. 1.

Ms. Davis, who joined the department in 1988, is Mr. Clemons’s sister-in-law. She served as warden of three of the 10 jails at Rikers, including the women’s detention center, before moving to administrative positions. Reached by telephone, she declined to comment.

Mr. McLaughlin has been with the department for 27 years and has held several posts. He was warden of the Robert N. Davoren Center, an adolescent jail at Rikers, during a period of extreme violence, and was removed from that command in 2008 shortly after Christopher Robinson, an 18-year-old inmate, was beaten to death by fellow inmates. Mr. McLaughlin could not be reached for comment.

Ms. Davis, Mr. McLaughlin and Mr. Clemons were promoted to their positions shortly after Mr. Ponte’s arrival in April. Ms. Davis will leave her position on Nov. 1, while Mr. Clemons and Mr. McLaughlin are to step down on Dec. 1.

In an interview on Tuesday, Mr. Ponte said that he was now reorganizing the department to improve oversight of the most violent jails at Rikers. This includes getting high-ranking officers out from behind their desks and onto the cellblocks for the majority of their workweek.

He has also designated a civilian, James E. Dzurenda, the former commissioner of Connecticut’s state prisons, to oversee the top ranking chiefs. The change represents a shifting of authority from the traditionally dominant uniformed staff.

The de Blasio administration has also been looking for ways to bring in new leaders, announcing in September that it was seeking to change civil service laws to allow the hiring of high-ranking correction officers from outside the department.

Under the reorganization, Mr. Ponte said he eliminated several top uniformed positions, including those of Ms. Davis and Mr. McLaughlin, prompting them to leave.

“We want to kind of take a look from the ground up with new eyes in these positions,” he said.

Asked whether Mr. Clemons was pressured to step down, Mr. Ponte said it was the chief’s “personal decision.”

Earlier this month, at a City Council hearing about violence at Rikers, Mr. Ponte praised Mr. Clemons for a “long history of doing good work in the agency.”

In a joint statement released on Tuesday, Ms. Mark-Viverito and Elizabeth Crowley, a council member and the chairwoman of the committee overseeing Rikers, urged Mr. de Blasio and Mr. Ponte to seek out new leadership.

“For too long, the Department of Correction has been rife with the mismanagement and mistreatment of inmates, and the Council’s oversight has only served to further shed light on the deep-seated issues plaguing the D.O.C.,” the statement said.

In the face of the harsh criticism directed at Mr. Clemons, some of his strongest support came from the powerful correction officers’ union and its president, Norman Seabrook. After the Council hearing, Mr. Seabrook’s deputy, Elias Husamudeen, wrote on the union’s website: “I feel like this Council is calling for the head of Chief Clemons.” But on Tuesday, union officials declined to comment on Mr. Clemons’s departure.

Mr. Clemons has largely kept a low profile since the Times report. He did not attend the recent Council hearing, prompting Councilwoman Crowley to say that he “did not have the backbone to appear.”

On Monday, Mr. Clemons arrived at the commissioner’s office at 7 a.m., before the regular staff meeting, Mr. Ponte said.

Investigators say Seabrook took kickbacks in connection with his union’s pension fund investments.

Seabrook allegedly received tens of thousands of dollars in payoffs and in exchange steered business to the Platinum investment fund. The former head of the fund, Murray Huberfeld, was also arrested Wednesday morning.

The news comes as the federal authorities investigate allegations that NYPD officers engaged in a cash-for-favors scheme, and as Mayor de Blasio’s campaign fundraising is under scrutiny. The mayor insists his fundraising followed all laws.

Seabrook has ties to two Borough Park fundraisers for the mayor — Jona Rechnitz and Jeremy Reichberg. The FBI investigating whether Rechnitz and Reichberg provided free vacations and other gifts to Seabrook and former NYPD Chief of Department Philip Banks.

Last week,Deputy Chief Michael Harrington,Chief David Colonand
Deputy Inspector James Grant jumped from the NYPD ship after Police Commissioner
Bill Bratton predicted that arrests were likely to stem from the sprawling
federal investigation that includes pay-for-favors activities at the NYPD and
Mayor Bill de Blasio’s various fundraising practices.

Rodriguez
was the executive officer of Patrol Borough Brooklyn South when he was
reassigned to desk duty as part of the FBI investigation. He had recently been
honored by the NYPD’s Desi Society for his community service work.

Capul was
the executive officer of the NYPD's Patrol Borough Manhattan North before he
was placed on administrative desk duty in April.

Rodriguez
served on the NYPD for more than 25 years, while Capul is a veteran with 32
years on the job.

Their
retirement will become official if no department charges are brought against
them during the next 30 days, which will then protect their pensions even if
they are later arrested and convicted of a felony.

"No
one has filed for service retirement with administrative charges pending or has
been identified by federal investigators as a target of their
investigation," Roy Richter, the president of the Captain Endowment
Association, pointed out.

Grant, the
former commander of the 19th Precinct, has also filed for retirement amid
allegations he accepted discounted earrings and a free trip to Las Vegas from
two businessmen with close ties to de Blasio and former NYPD Chief of
Department Philip Banks.

The
two-year federal probe started with a corruption tip involving Banks and
eventually snared numerous police officials taking free meals, gifts and even
trips from businessmen Jona Rechnitz and Jeremy Reichberg, who were members of
de Blasio’s Inauguration Committee.

Two other
officers from the NYPD License Division have also been stripped of their guns
and badges during the probe for allegedly taking bribes from a Borough
Park-based businessman, who was arrested for allegedly arranging gun permits
for friends and clients for up to $18,000 each.

Sunny Shue, died Saturday June 26, 2010. Video that Sunny did on April 9 2010, asking for protection from Judge Joseph Golia. Wednesday...

September 2, 2009 Hearing With Senator John Sampson on Judicial Accountability in New York State

We went to a Hearing with Senator John Sampson on September 24, 2009 on the New York Judicial Syatem. A few people were able to speak, and many others signed up to speak at a later date...that Sampson never scheduled.

First published in print: Monday, January 11, 2010
Here we thought that the first order of business this year for state Senate Democratic leader John Sampson would be to help regain that institution's credibility by passing radical ethics reforms.

The need for them would seem to be brutally obvious, in the wake of the conviction of former Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno on federal corruption charges and Governor Paterson's calls for requiring state officials members to disclose their outside income. First, though, Mr. Sampson has joined a large Manhattan law firm where one of the founding partners is on the board of the state Trial Lawyers Association.
That's right. Mr. Sampson now works not only for the people of New York, but also for the firm of Belluck & Fox, according to a New York Post report.

His salary in the former position is a matter of public record, of course -- $88,500. His salary in his new job, however, is something Mr. Sampson isn't about to disclose.

Just as New Yorkers need to learn more about legislators' outside interests, Mr. Sampson offers them less.

Imagine, then, what people might think if this is one more year when the Legislature fails to pass ethics laws. Or if it does, only a watered down version of what's need to clean up an institution where criminal indictments and convictions have become too commonplace?

What were Mr. Sampson's priorities, they might wonder -- transparency in government, or shielding from both his own finances and Belluch & Fox's clients?

The same questions might be asked as well of Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who holds a position of counsel to another Manhattan law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg. Little is known by the public about that arrangement, too, thanks to the alarmingly inadequate financial disclosure requirements for legislators that Mr. Silver seems to think are entirely adequate. We know he works for that particular firm, one of the largest tort law firms in New York, but we don't know what the nature of his work is, or on whose behalf he does it.

That will become all the more relevant in the event someone else in the Legislature tries to push for rewriting the state's medical malpractice laws or otherwise changing tort laws this session. Two of the most powerful people in state government work for law firms closely associated with the leading opponent of such legislation, namely the Trial Lawyers Association.

In Mr. Silver's case, he rather famously said of his legal work a half-dozen years ago, "I don't think it's a conflict. How many times do you want to hear this?"

In Mr. Sampson's case, the word comes from his office that his outside work won't interfere with his official duties.

Not exactly endorsements of ethics reform, are they?

THE ISSUE:

The state Senate Democratic leader has another job, too, not that he wants to talk about it.

THE STAKES:

When ethics reform is a major issue, how serious is he about stronger financial disclosure requirements?

Electronic Libraries and FOIA Links

Accountability is the Key

Westchester Guardian TV

Loading...

Click picture to view website

Victims-of-Law

Who is a Victim-of-Law?Victims-of-Law are persons who have been subjected to tyrannical or arbitrary rulings or edicts in violation of constitutional and civil rights under the democratic maxim reminiscent of our Republic -- the "Rule of Law"

The victims of unethical and corrupt lawyers, judges and employees of the state and federal judiciary demand accountability from those who abuse the power of office while they remain absolutely immune. The media as well as the legislative and executive branches of government traditionally ignore these abuses. The judicial branch itself hurls insults at the victim claiming they are nothing more than a 'disgruntled litigant' while ignoring substantive allegations.

It is essential to empower the victims of legal abuses. Our strength is in our numbers thus the more people that demand their constitutional and civil rights the quicker they will be attained.

What most people do not comprehend is that judges are immune from civil lawsuits. If a judge unlawfully imprisoned someone or maliciously denied due process in a case that cost a litigant millions of dollars, it doesn't matter. There is no redress for the aggrieved person.

The emotional and physical health problems inherent in these abuses are now coming to light but the judicial branches throughout our country continue to avoid or deliberately ignore what they have helped to create.

This website hopes to publish documented proof of many of the deliberate violations of the 'rule of law, the doctrine upon which our Constitutional Republic is based.

This website hopes to publish documented proof of many of the deliberate violations of the 'rule of law, the doctrine upon which our Constitutional Republic is based.

What is the "Rule of Law"? Equality and the Law

The right to equality before the law, or equal protection of the law as it is often phrased, is fundamental to any just and democratic society. Whether rich or poor, ethnic majority or religious minority, political ally of the state or opponent--all are entitled to equal protection before the law.

The democratic state cannot guarantee that life will treat everyone equally, and it has no responsibility to do so. However, writes constitutional law expert John P. Frank, "Under no circumstances should the state impose additional inequalities; it should be required to deal evenly and equally with all of its people."

No one is above the law, which is, after all, the creation of the people, not something imposed upon them. The citizens of a democracy submit to the law because they recognize that, however indirectly, they are submitting to themselves as makers of the law. When laws are established by the people who then have to obey them, both law and democracy are served.

The Supreme CourtThe Framers considered the rule of law essential to the safekeeping of social order and civil liberties. The rule of law holds that if our relationships with each other and with the state are governed by a set of rules, rather than by a group of individuals, we are less likely to fall victim to authoritarian rule. The rule of law calls for both individuals and the government to submit to the law's supremacy. By precluding both the individual and the state from transcending the supreme law of the land, the Framers constructed another protective layer over individual rights and liberties. --Reprinted from U.S. Dept. of State

Judicial Immunity is AbsoluteIn an unprecedented degree of 'abuse of power' judges decreed themselves absolutely immune from civil suit when they are "acting maliciously and corruptly." In 1996 the 104th Congress passed the Federal Courts Improvement Act amending the Civil Rights statute to give further immunities to malicious and corrupt judges.

Sec. 309. Prohibition against awards of costs, including attorney's fees, and injunctive relief against a judicial officer.28 USC 2412 note.>> for Costs.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no judicial officer shall be held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, in any action brought against such officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer's jurisdiction.(b) Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights.--Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end thereof "except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer's jurisdiction".

(c) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.--Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first sentence: ``, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable''.

Advocate for truth and An End To Judicial Immunity

About Betsy Combier

Reporter, paralegal, advocate,I will investigate, search on the internet and in all data bases for information that will help a person in need of resolution to a problem.I believe in substantive and procedural due process for all individuals, groups and organizations and trademarked the term "e-accountability" to describe the purpose of my work. I am the parent of four daughters.

National Forum on Judicial Accountability Badge

Google+ Badge

Notable Events Outside New York State

Search This Blog

Who is John Libecci?

On Sunday, August 16, 2009, a friend of a friend called me at approximately 2:10PM, a Mr. John Libecci. Mr. Libecci is, I understand, a private investigator who knows a friend of mine socially. I asked whether he could help me find out some information involving my federal court case filed in United States District court on June 8, 2009 involving the Surrogate Court and my mother's Will. After I told him about the property being taken by the court, he told me that the court never takes property without a reason; after I told him that the Will was never probated since I filed the Will (of my mom) on March 17, 1998), Mr. Libecci told me that "obviously the Will was not done right", and said that he worked for the Courts and the Judges. He would not tell me what he did for the Court and the judges, then hung up. If anyone has information about Mr. John Libecci please email me at betsy@parentadvocates.org. You may send me any information anonymously.