Dr. Tim Ball says several event should have exposed the great deception of the claim that human-caused CO2 with cause catastrophic climate change before now. An IPCC report approved by scientists was drastically altered before it was released. The climategate emails that exposed malfeasance, collusion, and manipulation of data, should have stopped the corruption, but it didn’t. He says the recent election of Donald Trump will eliminate the climate corruption. He will likely advocate withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.

Key changes were made to the IPCC's Second Assessment Report (SAR) on climate change after the scientists had met and accepted what they thought was the final peer-reviewed version. Frederick Seitz writes, "In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community ... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report." Nearly all of the changes removed the skepticism with which many scientists regard claims that human activities are having a major impact on climate in general and on global warming in particular.

Vested interests and professional positioning have led a long-term attack on dissenting views on climate change. Various psychological intimidation tactics have been
employed (name-calling, bullying) to denigrate and isolate researchers whose views and research dispute the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. In most areas of science, new perspectives are welcomed and discussed in a collegial manner. The author examines a case study of a recent peer-reviewed paper in climate science, “Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community” Lewandowsky, Oreskes et al (2015), in which disparaging words have infiltrated peer-reviewed works thus becoming officially condoned as an acceptable part of the scientific language.

This essay by Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen describes the politics and the abusive philosophy of science as practised by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its creations. The UN is using climate change as a tool to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution. The UN's real agenda is concentrated political authority. The theory of catastrophic man-made global warming has been falsified several times, but these “falsifications” have been totally ignored. It was once thought that “All swans are white” until a black swan was discovered.

Tom Harris, Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC), provides answers to nonsensical changes against ISCS in an error-riddled article published by Judah Freed on May 12, 2015 on Daily Kos. Freed's article is an attempt to discourage the media from publishing climate change facts from climate skeptics. The ICSC averages more than one significant media hit a day. Harris's answers to the nonsensical charges were deleted by Daily Kos shortly after it was submitted. The Daily Kos article falsely accuses the ICSC of being "industry-funded climate change deniers", and falsely claim that the Heartland Institute is a front for the Koch Brothers. They have never funded climate science activities of the Heartland Institute. The IPCC and FOS both promote the NIPCC report produced by the Heartland Institute.