Justice Ministry fesses up over plan to increase
rabbinic courts' power

Representatives of the Justice Ministry admitted Monday that
discussions had already been held to consider increasing the power of the
country's rabbinic courts
to include decisions on money matters and children in divorce
cases.

Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman.
Photo: Ariel Jerozolimski

At a special hearing of the Knesset Committee on the Advancement of
the Status of Women called by chairwoman MK Tzipi Hotovely (Likud), attorney
Horsha Gottleib, adviser to Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman, confirmed
that the rabbinic courts
had presented a bill aimed at increasing their power and explained that the
minister was still in the process of evaluating the proposal.

"It is a plan inherited from the previous government," said
Gottleib, contradicting comments made last week by Neeman, who claimed that
no such proposal existed.

Shimon Yacobi, legal adviser to the rabbinic courts,
said the basis of the legislation was to enable the religious legal system
to make additional rulings in divorce
cases, even after a legal separation had been decided.

Any changes to the status quo that would give the rabbinic courts
more power could end up being detrimental to the status of women in Israel,
said Prof. Ruth Halperin-Kaddari - head of Bar-Ilan's Rackman Center for the
Advancement of the Status of Women, and Israel's representative on the UN
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

According to Halperin-Kaddari - who was present at the hearing and whose
view was echoed by other women's rights groups there - the three problematic
changes include a motion to preclude the civil courts' handling cases
involving damages against husbands who refuse to grant their wives a get
(Jewish divorce); granting the rabbinic courts
jurisdiction over money matters in divorce proceedings; and permitting the
religious courts
to make decisions on issues that arise after a divorce has been ratified,
even if the case was initially heard in the secular court
system.

Matthew 5:31: It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:
32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

"The ministry is trying to give the impression that these
suggestions are only preliminary, but at today's meeting we found out that they
are indeed concrete proposals," said Halperin-Kaddari. "But I truly
believe that the rabbinic courts
are very serious about increasing their powers and have just been waiting for
the right time and a sympathetic minister to accept their cause."

In conclusion, Hotovely said that the frank discussion between the
rabbinic courts
and women's rights groups was a positive step toward resolving some of the
issues. She said that the committee would reevaluate the proposal after the
justice minister had made his recommendations.

The new American Girl doll: Shes Jewish, shes poor and her name is
Rebecca

The newest American Girl doll -- 9-year-old Rebecca
Rubin, a Jewish-American girl -- goes on sale May 31, 2009, along with six
books about her life.

Related Links

SAN FRANCISCO (JTA) -- Its official: The newest American Girl doll is
9-year-old Rebecca Rubin, a Jewish-American girl who lives with her family on
Manhattans Lower East Side in 1914.

The much-anticipated latest addition to the American
Girl series of historical characters, Rebecca goes on sale May 31 along with
six books about her life. No cheap date, she costs $95 with one book, or $118 if
accompanied by the complete set.

Rebecca joins 14 other historical dolls in the series -- from Kaya, a Nez
Perce girl set in 1764, to African-American Addy, a Civil War doll, to World War
II-era Molly, part of an Irish immigrant family. Her unveiling will include a
tie-in at the Tenement Museum in New York City and a harbor cruise with
kosher-style food, according to USA Today.

Shes a feisty girl, our Rebecca. In one book she rescues her cousin Anna
from the top of a stalled Ferris wheel. In another she marches in a garment
workers' strike and gives an impassioned speech about labor rights. But she also
cooks, crochets and dreams of becoming a movie star, just
like a proper lass.

Rebecca lives with her Russian-immigrant parents, siblings and grandparents
in a Lower East Side row house, just a step up from the tenements of Orchard
Street, and they struggle mightily to save boat fare to bring more family over
from the Old Country.

The Jewish blogosphere has been floating guesses about her name, release date
and details of her life for more than a year with an intensity that belied her
insensate status. She is, after all, just a doll, albeit a soft-bodied, large
and quite beautiful one. But Jews love history, especially their own, and Jewish
parents hip to the American Girl formula of nicely made dolls and well-written
books about the period of American history they represent wanted a piece of
their own peoples story to give their daughters.

This is our history, right here in this doll, says author Meredith
Jacobs of Rockville, Md., host of The Modern Jewish Mom on The Jewish
Channel.

Jacobs family is also from Eastern Europe, and her Uncle Sauls dreams
of becoming an actor were dashed by family pressure to enter the cantorate.

Jacobs plans to buy Rebecca and her books for her 13-year-old daughter,
Sophie, even though shes just beyond the target demographic.

I want her to read the books and talk to my parents about our
history," Jacobs says. "I dont think people who arent
Jewish think about how big a deal it is for a mainstream doll company to make
something Jewish.

Rebecca confronts many of the same dilemmas faced by todays American
Jewish children as they navigate between tradition and modernity. In
Candlelight for Rebecca, her teacher asks the class to make Christmas
centerpieces, and Rebecca agonizes over what to tell her parents. In Meet
Rebecca, she asks her father, an observant Jew who keeps kosher, why he opens
his shoe store on Shabbat. (They need the money, he explains).

Childrens author Jacqueline Dembar Greene penned the six books about
Rebeccas life, basing some of the stories on her own familys history. She
quizzed her mother-in-law about the correct usage of certain Yiddish words and
her 92-year-old father about his memories of riding the Ferris wheel at Coney
Island.

Greenes mother worked as a stitcher in a garment factory in Hartford,
Conn., much like the one where Rebeccas uncle and cousin suffered two decades
earlier.

Nothing had changed, Greene says. She told me about the bosses
walking up and down yelling at the workers, about being locked in even though it
was totally illegal. They werent allowed to talk or hum; they were timed when
they went to the bathroom.

Even the Christmas story came out of her own experience. Greene was in third
grade in the 1950s when her teacher asked the class to make Christmas
decorations.

With the help of G‑d - the "Healer of All Flesh Who Works
Wondrously" (as we praise Him daily in our prayers) - my recovery has
been most satisfactory, I have already been able to resume my duties.

With prayerful wishes for your continued good health and for success in
carrying out in the fullest measure the enormous responsibilities which Divine
Providence has bestowed on you, and

With esteem and blessing,

M Schneerson

Ninety-Fifth Congress of the United States of America

At the second session

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the
nineteenth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and seventy-eight

Joint Resolution

To authorize and request the President to issue a proclamation designating
April 18, 1978, as "Education Day, U.S.A.".

Whereas the Congress recognizes a need for the Nation to set aside on the
calendar a day devoted to the importance of education to the lives of its
citizens and to the general well-being of the Nation; and

Whereas the Lubavitch Movement, which conducts educational activities at
more than sixty centers in twenty-eight States as well as around the world, is
especially committed to the advancement of education and has proposed the
establishment of an "Education Day, U.S.A."; and

Whereas world Jewry marked in 1977 the seventy-fifth birthday of the
revered and renowned Jewish leader, the head of the worldwide Lubavitch
Movement., Rabbi Menachem
Mendel Schneerson, who proclaimed on that occasion a "Year of
Education"; and

Whereas the seventy-sixth birthday of this celebrated spiritual leader will
occur on April 19, 1978, thus concluding the year of Lubavitch Movement
activities dedicated to the "Year of Education" and the Lubavitcher
Rebbe's milestone birthday: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of
America in Congress assembled, That the President is authorized and requested
to issue a proclamation designating April 18, 1978, as "Education Day,
U.S.A.".

Thomas Phillip O'Neill
Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Walter F. Mondale
Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.

APPROVED
April 17, 1978
Jimmy Carter

Education Day, U.S.A., 1978

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

On April 13 of this year the Congress of the United States concluded its
deliberations on a joint resolution which recognized the need for this Nation
to set aside a special day devoted to recognizing the importance of education
in the lives of our citizens. To emphasize its commitment, the Congress has
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation designating April 18, 1978,
as Education Day, U.S.A., and calling for its appropriate observance. I am
honored to join with the House of Representatives and the Senate in
recognizing this need and privileged to comply with their request.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JIMMY CARTER, President of the United States of America,
do hereby proclaim Tuesday, April 18, 1978, as Education Day U.S.A. and I ask
all Americans to observe that day in such manner as reflects their commitment
to education and their recognition of its importance to the welfare of this
Nation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth day of
April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred seventy-eight, and of the
Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and second.

Jimmy Carter

On the first "Education Day USA," April 18, 1978, the Rebbe
held a public address. Here is an excerpt from the talk:

Most deserving of our very profound appreciation is one of the most
meaningful actions by the U.S. Congress who, in a joint resolution, carried
by a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives and by unanimous vote
in the Senate, authorized and requested the President of the United States to
proclaim this day as "Education Day, USA," which the President
graciously signed into law.

Anti-Christ Noahide Day USA, Jesus out of the American
Classrooms

While the timing of this action was conceived as a tribute to our movement,
which sees in education the cornerstone not only of Jewish life, but of humanity
at large, and has been dedicated to this vital cause ever
since its inception more than two hundred years agoit is a fitting and
timely tribute to the cause of education in general, focusing attention on what
is surely one of the Nation's top priorities.

It is fitting indeed that the U.S.A. has shown, through
a forceful example to the world, that it places education among its
foremost priorities. It is also to be hoped that "Education Day" will
become a permanent institution, especially since, by reason of the pervasive
nature of education, it would lend further significance to other
"Days" such as Father's Day and Mother's Day and similar institutions
which have become part of American life.

The proclamation of "Education Day, USA" is of extraordinary
significance in impressing upon citizens the importance of education, both in
their own lives as well as, and even more so, for the young generation in the
formative yearsparticularly in the present day and age.

No child left behind from Satan, their father the
Murderer from the beginning

We have now concluded the "Year of Education" proclaimed last year
on this day. This calls for review and introspection. In all humility we can say
that with G‑d's help it has been a very successful year for education,
with the addition of numerous educational facilities on all levels in the U.S.A.
and in many parts of the world; a substantially increased enrollment; and
upgrading the quality of education. However, needless to say, as long as there
is still one child that does not receive an adequate education, we can neither
be satisfied nor slacken our efforts. On the contrary, the successful
"Education Campaign" should spur us to even greater efforts in the
ensuing year. It is human nature that ambition grows with achievement. If this
is so in regard to material riches, how much more so in regard to real and
eternal values. Moreover, since this trait of the human nature to strive for
ever greater spiritual advancement has been given to every human being by the
Creator, as a commendable factor, it is self understood that the Creator
provides, at the same time, the capability and opportunities to translate it
into tangible results, for "G‑d requests of people only according to
their powers (that He has given them)."1
Thus, in the final analysis, it is mainly a matter of one's own will and
determination. And let no one be satisfied with just a little greater effort for
the cause of education, butin keeping fully with human nature as cited
abovedouble and redouble one's efforts for so vital a cause.

hahahahhaha seperation of Jesus Christ and state, the
inculcation of the MURDERER and your Noahide "kids"

Education, in general, should not be limited to the acquisition of knowledge
and preparation for a career, or, in common parlance, "to make a better
living." And we must think in terms of a '"better living" not
only for the individual, but also for the society as a whole. The educational
system must, therefore, pay more attention, indeed the main attention, to the
building of character, with emphasis on moral and ethical
values.

Do i heah aeean moment of silence.....allelujah

(Need one be reminded of what happened in our lifetime in a country that
ranked among the foremost in science, technology, philosophy, etc.?)

Education must put greater emphasis on the promotion of fundamental human
rights and obligations of justice and morality, which are the basis of any human
society, if it is to be truly human and not turn into a jungle.

The United States of America has a long-standing policy of foreign aid to
developing countries, through direct grants and through U.N. agencies. Economic
aid to foreign countries includes also cultural aid for the promotion and
support of cultural programs, etc.

It is generally recognized, at any rate among the free and democratic
nations, that each nation is a member of the Family of nations, (seventy
Noahide nations) and all must live together in "the world"
which is like one organism. When any part of an organism ails, it affects the
whole body; strengthening any part of the body strengthens the whole.

and the cancer is the leaven of the Pharisees

The record of this Nation's foreign aid is unexcelled in the annals of
history, which is as it should be for a Nation so generously blessed by the
Al-mighty. One would wish, however, for more affirmative action in the area of
cultural, particularly educational, programs.

Economic aid given to a developing country is meant to be used most
efficiently and productively. While the conditions attached to such aid must
necessarily be limited and circumspect, there are certain conditions which are
considered prerequisites. To cite a recent example, President Carter has taken a
courageous stand on Human Rights, dismissing the notion that it is an
"internal matter," and he has made it also a condition of Foreign Aid.
It is to the President's credit that he has not only raised this issue, but has
succeeded in arousing the world's "interest" in behalf of this cause.
"Unofficially," however, there is a great deal more that the U.S.
government can do to make foreign aid even more productive.

This Nation, with a healthy intuition, indeed, conviction, recognized that
its economic system must not be based on crass materialism. Nothing expresses
this idea more eloquently and forcefully than the motto on the American
Dollar"In G‑d We Trust."

The eye of their Masonic Phoenician wannabe god, Horus,
the destroyer whom they trust

In giving out billions of dollars in foreign aid, many discreet ways can be
found to have the beneficiaries take a look and ponder on this inscription, with
a view to encouraging them to recognize the importance of Trust in G‑d, of
appropriate education, with particular emphasis on moral values and genera,
humanitarian principles, as mentioned above.

Carrying this train of thought further brings us also to the question of
military aid.

Ideally, education should lead to a world state where "Nation shall not
lift up sword against Nation, neither shall they train for war."2
Until such an ideal state is reached, there will be a needin the Nation's own
interestto provide friendly, democratic nations with military aid for self
defense, but not to provide military aid to nations that will use it to start
war. It would surely be in the best interests of those countries themselves, as
well as of the United States and the world at large, if, instead, goodwill and
benevolence towards them were expressed in terms of economic and cultural aid,
to help them raise a new generation free from hatred and violence and bent on
channeling their youthful energies and ambitions towards all that is good, good
for them and for their countries, and the common good of humanity both
materially and spiritually.

By the forcing of their Satanic self preserving
"Hate Crines" legislation

In light of all that has been said above, it is most gratifying indeed that
President Carter, Vice-President Mondale, and the eminent members of the United
States Congress, G‑d bless each and all of them, have thoughtfully and
graciously initiated and associated themselves with the Proclamation of
"Education Day, U.S.A." It augurs well for the vital cause of
education in the United States. It will, we hope and pray, also have a
beneficial impact on education in all countries which look up to the United
States of America for leadership and inspiration in all vital matters that
transcend national boundaries, and conduce to a better human society and a
better world.

THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON

September 18, 1978

To Rabbi Menachem
Schneerson

I read with great interest the full page ad that appeared in the Washington
Post on Monday, September 11, 1978, which reproduced portions of your response
to the resolution passed by Congress designating April 18, "Education Day -
U.S.A." I admire the thoughts which you expressed--and am grateful for your
support and prayers.

I am delighted that "Education Day - U.S.A."
falls on your birthday. It is a most fitting coincidence and I would like
to take this opportunity of extending to you my personal best wishes for many
more years of good health and fruitful work.

I am honored and deeply gratified to receive your kind and thoughtful letter
of September 18, 1978.

I particularly appreciate your laudatory reference to the resolution passed
by Congress designating April 18 as "Education Day - U.S.A." Your
personal interest in the cause of Education, coupled with the influence of your
exalted position, goes a long way in promoting the vital importance of Education
in general, and is a source of further encouragement to the dedicated activities
of the movement which I am privileged to head. It is also in behalf
of our movement, no less than in my own behalf, that I gratefully welcome
your warm sentiments and good wishes.

At the appropriate occasion I will take the liberty of quoting your letter,
for which I trust I have your permission in the public interest.

In this solemn season of our Jewish Calendar, on the threshold of the New
Year 5739, I extend to you and to the First Lady and all your esteemed family
prayerful wishes for good health and prosperity and the fullest measure of
achievement in your most exalted position.

With profound esteem and with blessing,

Cordially,

M. Schneerson

THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON

December 13, 1978

To Rabbi and Mrs. Menachem Schneerson

I am pleased to join your family and friends in sending you my warmest
congratulations on your 50th wedding anniversary. May love and devotion continue
to bless your marriage.

In light of your gracious letter of September 18, l978, with reference to the
resolution passed by Congress designating April l8, "Education Day -
U.S.A." which you signed into law, it will come as no surprise to you, Mr.
President, that your proposal to establish a Cabinet-level Department of
Education has received my fullest endorsement and acclaim.

This was one of the main topics of my public address on the occasion of the
annual observance of the Yahrzeit of my saintly predecessor on the 10th of
Shevat.

At the same time I expressed my ardent hope that not only will
the proposal be expeditiously acted upon by Congress, but that
governments of other nations will emulate your example. For, although some
countries already have a separate Department of Education, there are those that
have not, and all those where education has still to be placed as a top national
priority.

I am, of course, referring to education in a broader and deeper sense--not
merely as a process of imparting knowledge and training for a "better
living," but for a "better life," with due emphasis on character
building and moral and ethical values.

Indeed, the U.S. government, and you Mr. President personally, are in a
unique position of influence among the nations of the world, particularly those
benefiting from U.S. economic, cultural and other forms of aid, to encourage
them to follow your example and to share your "conviction that the noblest
task of government is education"--to quote your statement (2/28/78)--a
conviction which has been translated into bold, comprehensive action. I am
confident that the response will be positive, and I venture to say that it would
have a favorable feedback impact on those in this country who, for one reason or
another, are not, as yet, enthusiastic about Congress legislation on the
submitted project.

I read with profound interest your Remarks at Meeting of Ad Hoc Committee For
a Cabinet Department of Education, Jan. 24, l979. Needless to say, I fully
endorse the substance and urgency of your message. Indeed, in light of the
saying of our Sages, "Words coming from the heart penetrate the heart and
are eventually effective," I am confident, Mr. Vice-President, that your
words will find the proper response they deserve.

You will surely recall, Sir, the meeting at the Caucus Room of Congress,
which you graciously chaired, in celebration of the H.
J. Res. 770, authorizing and requesting the President to issue the
Proclamation designating April l9, l978, as "Education Day, U.S.A." I
trust you also read some of my remarks in this connection that appeared in the
Congressional Record, the thrust of which, permit me to reiterate, was:

Education, in general, should not be limited to the acquisition of knowledge
and preparation for a career, or in common parlance. "to make a better
living!" We must think in terms of a "better life," not only for
the individual, but also for society as a whole. The
educational system must, therefore, pay more attention, indeed, the main
attention, to the building of character, with emphasis on moral and ethical
values.

Teach the children how to REJECT Jesus Christ the
Messiah, this is the same Tactics they used in the Soviet Union, just before
they MURDERED over 60 Million Goyim

The above principle, which is surely indisputable, assumes added significance
now that the Administration is making an all-out effort to promulgate the
required legislation to implement the President's proposal for a Cabinet level
Department of Education--for the following reason:

The skepticism on the part of those who, at present, oppose the
Administration's educational program (of which you make mention in your Remarks)
is, I believe, in large measure due to the shortcomings of the educational
system in this country, which leaves much to be desired in the way of achieving
its most basic objectives for a better society. In a country, such as ours, so
richly blessed with democracy, freedom of opportunity, and material resources,
one would expect that such anti-moral and anti-social phenomena as juvenile
delinquency, vandalism, lack of respect for law and order, etc. would have been
radically reduced, to the point of ceasing to be a problem. Hence, it is not
surprising that many feel frustrated and apathetic.

I submit, therefore, that the Administration's
resolve to restructure the Federal education role--long overdue--would be
well served if it were coupled with greater emphasis on the objective of
improving the quality of education in terms of moral and ethical values and
character building that should be reflected in the actual everyday life of our
young and growing generation.

I take the liberty of enclosing a copy of a brief memorandum on the subject,
which I trust you will find of interest.

With prayerful wishes and blessings for success in your endeavors to upgrade
the educational system, and in all your public and personal affairs,

I remain, Mr. Vice-President,

Cordially yours,

M. Schneerson

On December 17, 1979, during the Iran hostage
crisis, the President attended the lighting of the National Menorah
in front of the White House, sponsored by American Friends of Lubavitch. It was
his first appearance since the crisis. Here are his remarks.

It's a real honor for me to come from the White House here to this ceremony
celebrating the commencement of Chanukah,
last night, the Festival of Lights.

As many of you know, the season of Chanukah commemorates the victory of
religious (Satan Worship) freedom. At the
commencement of the celebration of this annual event, this season of
thanksgiving and closeness to God, there was a miracle within which the candle
which was supposed to only burn a short time burned for 8 days and nights.

This miracle showed that God meets our needs. If we depend on Him, He will
meet our needs. This also shows that there is a need to celebrate courage and to
remember that hope in one's breast need never die.

This season, religious season, commemorates the perpetuation of age-old
dreams and the hunger of men and women down through the ages to maintain a
spirit committed to life under the most difficult circumstances, the most
difficult persecutions, the most difficult dangers, and under the most difficult
suffering. It also commemorates humankind's commitment to be free.

These commitments to live and to be free are ever present these days in the
minds and hearts of all Americans, because we know that 50 of our fellow human
beings, our fellow citizens, are not free and they want to live. We pray that
this will prevail, this desire to be free and to maintain life.

The first candle that I lit, the shammes
candle, has given its light now in this glass cage to five other candles. It has
not itself been diminished. It shows that when we give life and love to others,
the life and love in our own hearts is not diminished. As a matter of fact it
grows the more we share it. So, tonight we pray that our closeness to God, our
memory of these fine commitments of human beings down through the ages will
strengthen our desires to share our life and our love, not only with the 50
American hostages, for whom we pray constantly, but for men and women throughout
the world who don't always have freedom and whose lives might be in danger.

I'm very grateful that this beautiful menorah has been dedicated for the
commemoration of the season of Chanukah, and I'm very grateful as President to
be partaking in this commemoration of a season when human beings are drawn
closer to God and, in that spirit, have confidence that the future will bring us
a better life with God and with one another.

Thank you very much.

THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON

January 28, 1980

To Rabbi Menachem Schneerson

I welcome this opportunity to congratulate you on your thirtieth anniversary
as Lubavitcher Rebbe.

You have greatly strengthened your religious movement and the societies it
has served. Men, women and children in this country and abroad are richer for
the programs you have initiated and for the precepts of Judaism you have upheld.

Both Jews and non-Jews rejoice with you in this milestone, and all of us join
in tribute to the social and humanitarian achievements you have inspired and
implemented during these three decades.

Roselyn and I hope this celebration will be as satisfying for you as your
enduring work has been for all those who have benefited from it. We send you our
warmest personal regards.

By the Grace of G‑d
13th of Shevat, 5740
January 31, 1980
Brooklyn, N.Y.

The Honorable S. E. Eizenstat
The White House
Washington, D.C.

Greeting and Blessing:

It was a distinct pleasure to see you and greet you personally at the
thirtieth anniversary celebration of Yud
Shevat. I was also deeply gratified on being informed of the very impressive
address you delivered at the dinner reception preceding the Farbrengen
in tribute to our Lubavitch movement before that distinguished audience.

I sincerely appreciate your warm sentiments and good wishes, which I can best
reciprocate by reiterating the dictum of our Sages, "He who blesses others
is blessed by G‑d Himself. Accordingly, may you and yours be blessed out
of His full, open, holy, and ample Hand," in a most generous measure,
materially and spiritually.

Included in the above is also the blessing for Hatzlocho in the high
position which Divine Providence has bestowed on you to be closely associated
with the President of the United States, with extraordinary opportunities of
rendering public service on the highest level, for Jews and non-Jews, both in
this country and in many parts of the world.

With all good wishes to you and yours, and

With esteem and blessing

M. Schneerson

P.S. Along with expressing my appreciation to the President for gracing the
ceremony of lighting the Chanukah Candelabra in front of the White House with
his presence, I take this opportunity of conveying to you my sincere pleasure at
your participation in the ceremony, together with your wife and sons and being
honored with actually lighting it. May the message of the Chanukah Lights
illuminate your lives and brighten your mazel,
and may it also be "a light unto the feet" of all mankind.

THE WHITE HOUSE

WASHINGTON

April 17, 1980

Dear Rabbi Schneerson:

Thank you very much for your January 31, 1980, letter to me and to President
Carter.

It was a great honor for me to represent the President at the 30th
anniversary celebration of Yud Shevat.

I found the whole evening, particularly the Farbrengen, to be one of the most
moving experiences I have ever had.

I wish you and your great movement continued strength and good health.

Very truly yours,

Stuart E. Eizenstat
Assistant to the President
for Domestic Affairs and Policy

What
the Satanic Anti-Christ Sanhedrin of these Hasidic Chabad, neglects to share
form their Oral tradition which makes the WORD of GOD of none effect to them
and their two fold children of hell proselytes, Noahides

Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin

for it is written, The earth also was corrupt before God;1
and a Tanna of the School of R. Ishmael taught: Wherever corruption is
mentioned, it must refer to immorality and idolatry.2
'Immorality.' as it is written, for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the
earth.3 'Idolatry,' for it is
written, Lest ye corrupt yourselves and make you a graven image, etc.4
And the other teacher [who deduces this from the verse, and the Lord God
commanded etc.]?5 He maintains
that this verse [sc. the earth also etc.] merely describes their way of
living.6 'Bloodshed', as it is
written, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, etc.7
And the other?8  This verse [he
will maintain] merely teaches the manner of execution.9
Robbery, for it is written, As the wild herbs have I given you all things;10
upon which R. Levi commented: as the wild herbs, but not as the cultivated
herbs.11 And the other?12
 He will hold that this verse is written to permit animal flesh,13
[but not to prohibit robbery]. Flesh cut from the living animal, as it is
written, But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye
not eat.14 And the other?15
 He may hold that this verse teaches that flesh cut from live reptiles is
permitted.16 Emasculation, for it is
written, Bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.17
And the other?18  He may regard this
merely as a blessing.19 Forbidden
mixture, as it is said, Of fowls after their kind.20
And the other?21  He will maintain
that this was merely for the sake of mating.22

R. Joseph said, The scholars23
stated: A heathen (Goyim,
non Jew) is executed
for the violation of three precepts  Mnemonic G Sh R24
viz., adultery, bloodshed, and blasphemy. R. Shesheth objected: Now bloodshed
is rightly included, since it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man, by
man shall his blood be shed;25 but
whence do we know the others? If they are derived from bloodshed,26
the other four should also be included; whilst if their inclusion is taught by
the extending phrase any man,27 should
not idolatry too be included?28
But R. Shesheth said thus: The scholars stated, A heathen is executed for the
violation of four precepts [including idolatry]. But is a heathen executed for
idolatry? Surely it has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for
which a Jewish court decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are
forbidden to the heathen. This implies that they are merely forbidden, but
their

violation is not punished by death!  R. Nahman b.
Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence.29

Matthew 26:59: Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put him to death;
60: But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses,
61: And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.
62: And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
63: But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.
64: Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
65: Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy.
66: What think ye? They answered and said, He is guilty of death.
67: Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands,
68: Saying, Prophesy unto us, thou Christ, Who is he that smote thee?

R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A
heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the
Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all. Now is a
heathen executed for robbery? Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery
 if one stole or robbed30
or [seized] a beautiful woman,31 or
[committed] similar offences,32 if
[these were perpetrated] by one Cuthean33
against another, [the theft, etc.] must not be kept, and likewise [the theft]
of an Israelite by a Cuthean, but that of a Cuthean by an Israelite may be
retained'?34 But if robbery is a
capital offence, should not the Tanna have taught: He incurs a penalty? 
Because the second clause wishes to state, 'but that of a Cuthean by an
Israelite may be retained,' therefore the former clause reads, '[theft of an
Israelite by a Cuthean] must not be kept.'35
But where a penalty is incurred, it is explicitly stated, for the commencing
clause teaches: 'For murder, whether
of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is
incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty'?36
 How else could that clause have been taught? Could he state,
'forbidden' 'permitted'? Surely it

has been taught; A Cuthean and a [Jewish] shepherd of small cattle [sheep,
goats, etc.]37 need neither be rescued
[from a pit] nor may they be thrown [therein]!38
'And similar acts.' To what can this apply in the case of robbery?  R. Aha
b. Jacob answered: To a worker in a vineyard [who eats of the grapes]. When
so? If his is the finishing work, it is permitted?39
If it is not the finishing work, is it not actual robbery?40
 But R. Papa said: This applies to [the theft of] an article worth less
than a perutah.41 But if so, why
say that such robbery of a Jew by a Cuthean must not be kept: does he not
forgive him?42  Though he later
forgives him, he is grieved when it occurs [therefore it is prohibited] 
But how can you say that such robbery by one Cuthean from another is but a
'similar act' [i.e., bordering on robbery]: since a Cuthean does not forgive,43
is it not actual theft?  But R. Aha, the son of R. Ika answered; It applies
to the withholding of a labourer's wage.44
One Cuthean from another, or a Cuthean from an Israelite is forbidden, but an
Israelite from a Cuthean is permitted.45
To what can 'a similar act' apply in the case of a beautiful woman?  When
R. Dimi came,46 he said in the name of
R. Eleazar in the name of R. Hanina: To a heathen who allotted a bondwoman to
his slave [for concubinage] and then took her for himself, for this he is
executed.47

'A similar act', however, is not taught with reference to murder.48
Abaye said: If it should be, however, that it is so taught, it would be in
accordance with R. Jonathan b. Saul. For it has been taught; If one was
pursuing his neighbour to slay him, and the latter could have saved himself by
maiming a limb [of the pursuer, e.g., his foot], and did not thus save himself
[but killed him instead],

And once they were punished for these offences, they
must first have been admonished against them.

Ibid. 'Corrupted his way' connotes immorality; cf.
the way of a man with a maid. Prov. XXX, 19.

Deut. IV, 16.

How does he utilize this latter verse?

But is not intended to imply a prohibition.

Gen. IX, 6.

I.e., who deduces it from the verse, all the Lord
commanded.

I.e., by the sword, v. p. 380 n. 5; but the fact of
execution is taught elsewhere.

Ibid. 3.

I.e., only as that which grows wild, without any
owners; but not as that which is cultivated, hence owned by someone. This
proves that robbery was forbidden them.

V. n. 8.

Which was prohibited to Adam, v. infra 59b.

Ibid. 4. 'Flesh with the blood thereof' means flesh
cut from the living animal.

V. n. 8.

V. infra 59a, b.

Ibid. This, of course, is a direct negation of
emasculation.

V. p. 386, n. 8,

But it is not intended to convey any prohibition.

Ibid. VI, 20; hence different species are not to be
crossed.

V. p. 386, n. 8.

It being easier to mate with the same species than
with another; but no prohibition is implied thereby.

The term be Rab does not necessarily mean the
school presided over by Rab, though it may have that meaning occasionally.
In one sense, it connotes the school founded by him, but lasting many
generations after his lifetime. In another, it denotes schools in general.
In this very instance, the views attributed to be Rab conflict with the
teaching of Rab, Rab Judah, and all his disciples (Weiss. Dor II, p. 206.)

[H]: a mnemonic is given to facilitate the
remembering of the subjects of a discussion. Here it stands for Gilluy 'Arayoth
 adultery; Shefikuth damin  murder; and birkath ha-shem 
blasphemy.

Gen. IX, 6.

That as bloodshed was forbidden on pain of death,
so were the others too.

Heb. [H]. Lev. XXIV, 15: Any man ([H]) that curseth
his God shall bear his sin. Ibid. XVIII, 6: No man ([H]) shall approach to
any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness. In both cases
one referring to blasphemy, and the other to incest, the repetition of ish
extends the law to embrace heathens too.

Lev. XX, 2: Whosoever he be (ish ish ) of the
children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that
giveth any of his seed to Moloch (i.e., engages in idol worship); he shall
surely be put to death. The repetition then, here too, should extend the
death penalty for idolatry to heathens.

I.e., in speaking of heathens, when the Tanna
teaches that they are forbidden to do something, he ipso facto
teaches that it is punishable by death; for only in speaking of Jews is it
necessary to distinguish between prohibition and punishment.

Stole (ganab) refers to secret stealing,
robbed (gazal), to stealing by open violence.

In war, v. Deut. XXI, 10-14  a species of
robbery. [This is the only possible and correct rendering of the text,
contra Goldschmidt. Cf. Tosef A.Z.]

Acts which are not actual robbery, but partake of
its nature.

'Cuthean'
(Samaritan) was here substituted by the censor for the original goy
(heathen).

But actually it is punishable too. [This is merely
a survival of old Semitic tribal law that regarded theft and robbery as a
crime against the state, and consequently punishable by death. V. Muller,
D. H., Hammurabi, 88]

Thus the Tanna does refer to punishment; since then
he omits a reference to punishment in the clause under discussion, it
shows that the heathen is not executed for robbery. In the whole of this
discussion the punishment referred to is death.

Both are regarded as robbers the latter because
they permit their charges to graze in other people's fields.

One need neither exert oneself to save them from
death, nor may one encompass it. This, of course, is theoretical only, v.
p. 388, n. 6. Not a few of these harsh utterances (where they do not
reflect the old Semitic tribal law, v. p. 388. n. 7) were the natural
result of Jewish persecution by the Romans, and must be understood in that
light. In actual practice, these dicta were certainly never acted upon,
and it is significant that a commission of Roman officers, after
investigating Jewish law in its relation to Gentiles, took exception only
to two laws, one relating to the damage done by a goring ox, and the other
permitting a Jew the use of property stolen from a Gentile. R. Gamaliel
repealed this latter law. (B.K. 38a: Sifre Deut. 344.) Hence, reverting to
the discussion, the Tanna could not have stated that the murder of a
Cuthean by a Jew is permissible, therefore he is forced to speak of
punishment.

E.g., the gathering in of the grapes. Deut. XXIII,
25 is interpreted by the Rabbis as referring to work in connection with
the finishing touch given to the produce.

Not merely bordering thereon.

A small coin, one-eighth of the Roman as.

One does not mind such a trifle, and readily
forgives it.

Even such a trifle, v. infra 59a.

This only
borders on a robbery, for actual robbery means depriving a person of what
he already possesses

I.e., non-actionable.

R. Dimi was a Palestinian Amora of the fourth
century, who travelled to and fro between, Babylon and Palestine, and was
very zealous in transmitting the teachings of Palestine Scholars to his
colleagues in Babylon (v. J. E. IV, 603; cf. p. 361, n. 5, supra.

This, though not actual robbery, is similar to it.

A deed is either actual murder or not. Even
unwitting murder is murder, though the Almighty shewed mercy by sparing
the murderer.

R. Jacob b. Aha found it written in the scholars'2
Book of Aggada:3 A heathen is executed on the ruling of
one judge, on the testimony of one witness, without a formal warning, on the
evidence of a man, but not of a woman, even if he [the witness] be a relation.
On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is executed] even for the
murder of an embryo. Whence do we know all this?  Rab Judah answered: The
Bible saith, And surely your blood of your lives will I require;4
this shows that even one judge [may try a heathen].5
At the hand of every living thing will I require it: even without an
admonition having been given;6 And
at the hand of man: even on the testimony of one witness;7
at the hand of man:8 but not at
the hand [i.e., on the testimony] of a woman; his brother: teaching that even
a relation may testify. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He is
executed] even for the murder of an embryo. What is R. Ishmael's reason?
Because it is written, Whoso sheddeth the blood of man within [another] man,
shall his blood be shed.9 What is
a man within another man?  An embryo in his mother's womb.10
But the first Tanna [who excludes the murder of an embryo from capital
punishment] is a Tanna of the school of Manasseh, who maintains that every
death penalty decreed for the heathens is by strangulation. He connects the
[second] 'man' with the latter half of the sentence, and interprets thus:
Whoso sheddeth man's blood, within man [i.e., within him], shall his blood be
shed. Now, how can man's blood be shed, and yet be retained within him? By
strangulation.

R. Hamnuna objected: Now, is not a [heathen] woman commanded [to keep the
social laws]? Surely it is written, For I know him, that he will command his
sons and his household [which includes the womenfolk] after him, and they
shall keep the way of the Lord to exercise charity, and judgment?11
 He raised the objection, and he answered it himself: he would command 'his
sons' to exercise judgment; 'his daughters' to perform charity.

R. Awia the elder said to R. Papa: Let us say that a heathen woman who
committed murder must not be executed, since it is written, at the hand of
every man [who committed murder] etc. implying,12
'but not at the hand of woman'?  He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: Whoso
sheddeth man's blood implies whosoever it be [even a woman]. Let us say that a
heathen woman who committed adultery is not executed, since it is written,
therefore shall a man forsake [his father and mother, and cleave to his wife],
implying12 that a man [must cleave],
but not a woman?  He replied: Thus did Rab Judah say: The verse, And they
shall be as one flesh, reassimilated them to each other [making the law of
fidelity applicable to both].

filthy sickness these Vipers are

Our Rabbis taught: [A man, a man shall not approach to any that is near of
kin to him, to uncover their nakedness.13
It would have been sufficient to state,] A man shall not approach etc. What is
taught by the repetition, A man, a man?  The extension of the law to
heathens, that they too are forbidden incest [including adultery]. Now is this
deduced from this verse; is it rather not deduced from a different text, viz.,
[And the lord God commanded ] saying, which refers to adultery?14
 The latter text refers to adultery with a woman of their own [i.e., with a
heathen married woman]; the former to adultery with one of ours [i.e., a
Jewish married woman], for the second clause teaches: If he committed incest
with a Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law. With regard to what is
this?15  R. Nahman said in the name
of Rabbah b. Abbuha: With regard to an assembly, witnesses and formal
admonition.16 Is a Jewess then of less
account?17 But R. Johanan answered
thus: It is with regard to a betrothed Jewish maiden,18
whose violation by heathen law is not a capital offence;19
hence they are judged by Jewish law.

But if their offence was against a fully married woman, are they judged
according to their law? Surely it has been taught: 'If a heathen committed
adultery with a [Jewish] betrothed maiden, he is stoned; with a fully married
woman, he is strangled.' Now if we judged them according to the law pertaining
to them, should he not be
decapitated?  R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: By a 'married woman' this
Baraitha means one whose huppah ceremony20
has been performed, but without the marriage being consummated. Since by their
law her violation is not a capital offence, they are judged by ours. For R.
Hanina taught: They recognise the inviolability of a woman whose union has
been consummated, but not if she merely entered the huppah without the union
having been consummated. It has been taught in agreement with R. Johanan: All
prohibited [sexual] relationships for which a Jewish Beth din imposes
capital punishment are forbidden to heathens, but those for which a Jewish Beth
din does not impose death are permitted to heathens; this is R. Meir's
view. But the Sages maintain: There are many relationships21
for which a Jewish Beth din does not impose death, which are
nevertheless forbidden to a Gentile. If a heathen committed incest with a
Jewess, he is judged according to Jewish law; if with a heathen woman, he is
judged according to heathen law. The only difference that this makes is with
respect to a betrothed maiden.22 But
should not the Tanna include a woman whose huppah ceremony has been performed
without the marriage being consummated?  The teacher of this Baraitha is
the Tanna of the college of Manasseh, who maintains that every death penalty
decreed for the heathens is by strangulation, and by both codes [Jewish and
heathen] this last-mentioned offence is punished by strangulation.

Now, is R. Meir of the opinion that all relationships for which a Jewish Beth
din imposes capital punishment are forbidden to heathens? Surely it has
been taught: A proselyte,

Yet this cannot be regarded as real murder, and
hence may be called 'a similar act'. But the sages dispute this, and
maintain that he is not executed at all.

V. p. 387, n, 7. It may also mean the School of Rab
(Bacher. Agad. Bab. Amor. p. 2).

Aggadah (or Haggadah, from nagad, to
declare), means the whole non-legal portion of Jewish learning. Here
however, an actual law is cited from the Book of Aggadah. In the T.
J. and Midrashim, many statements cited in the T. B. as being from the
Book of Aggadah of the schools, are those cited under the name of
Noachian precepts. Hence it is possible that the reference is to a
collection of laws relating to Gentiles, and in order to distinguish it
from specifically Jewish laws, it was called the Book of Aggadah
(Weiss, Dor, III, p. 158).

Gen. IX, 5.

The interpretation is based on the use of the
singular, 'I' will require.

This is based on the extending word 'every'.

This is based on the singular.

Not the same phrase in Heb. as the preceding one.

Lit. rendering of Gen. IX, 6.

This law was directed against the Roman practice of
prenatal murder. Weiss, Dor, II, 22.

Ibid. XVIII, 19. Why then should a woman's
testimony be inadmissible?

According to Rab Judah's exegesis.

Lit. rendering of Lev. XVIII, 6.

V. p. 383.

Since by the Noachian Law also he is liable to
death.

He must be tried by a full Sanhedrin; he cannot be
convicted on the testimony of less than two witnesses, and he must have
been formally admonished before committing the offence.

I.e., is he dealt with more leniently because his
offence was against a Jewess? For when his offence is against a heathen,
these are unnecessary.

V. p. 333, n. 3; p. 337, n. 5.

As they do not regard her as married until the
actual consumation of the nuptials.

V. p. 333, n. 3.

The Gaon of Wilna deletes 'many': Maimonides
likewise does not include it in his text. Actually, the dispute of the
Sages and R. Meir is only in reference to a half sister by one's mother.

Tosef. 'A.Z. IX. Since heathen law does not
recognise this as a capital offence, he is judged by our law. This
statement supports R. Johanan's contention.

Babylonian
Talmud: Sanhedrin 71Talmud Online, zipped for download,
searchable: Tohoroth, Niddah, Nazir, Horayoth, Sanhedrin, Sotah, Yebamoth,
Shabbath, Kethuboth, Gittin, Berakoth, Baba Mezi'a, Baba Kamma, Baba
Bathra, Nedarim, Abodah Zara... his penalty was decapitation , and
it is so now too. But [the ...... [conversion] by decapitation , but
now by strangulation ?  ...... of the Rabbis that decapitation is
severer [than stoning] ; but on the ...... ; now by decapitation !  The
lesser is included in ...http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_71.html

Babylonian
Talmud: Sanhedrin 40Talmud Online, zipped for download,
searchable: Tohoroth, Niddah, Nazir, Horayoth, Sanhedrin, Sotah, Yebamoth,
Shabbath, Kethuboth, Gittin, Berakoth, Baba Mezi'a, Baba Kamma, Baba
Bathra, Nedarim, Abodah Zara... by stoning or decapitation. 31
Again, the same is deduced for ...... is punished by decapitation, which
is therefore also the ...... by stoning or decapitation, viz.,
idolatry and witnesses proved ...... than burning, and decapitation
milder. I.e., how then can we deduce a ...http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_40.html

Rv:20:4: And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them:
and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

______________

Jerusalem that
Great Harlot City, Spiritual Sodom and Egypt, Oh how they are gloating Goats

(IsraelNN.com) A poll carried by Geocartographia reveals that
barely 50 percent of Israelis aged 18-35 will vote in the Knesset
elections February 10. Most of those who plan to stay away from
the polling stations explained that they were not interested or
that that there is no worthwhile candidate.

Almost half of the respondents said that the agenda of the
government is out of touch with their daily lives, and more than
two-thirds said that most politicians are corrupt.

(IsraelNN.com) More than 70 percent of Israelis say the government
is very corrupt, according to a poll conducted as part of the
Israel-Sderot Conference on Social Issues. Forty-six percent
believe government ministries are corrupt, and 44 percent believe
the same of the Knesset.

The Israel-Sderot Conference will open on Tuesday and continue for
two days. Its goal is placing of socio-economic issues on
Israel's public agenda, organizers say.

Shalom Rabbi Yisroel, did you find this suprising? I think after
the war in the north of Israel not so long ago, that was a
disaster in terms of the organization and coordination of the army
etc., the people were already getting pretty upset with the
government at that time. (btw I don't really follow the news that
much but I listen to Israel National Radio, which keeps me up to
date.)
_________________
Na Nach Nachma Nachman MeUmanhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/AaronBenjamin/

Czech men jailed for Nazi flag

May 20, 2009

JERUSALEM (JTA)-- A Czech court sentenced three men to prison for posing
in a picture with a Nazi flag.

The district court in Teplice on Tuesday sentenced
three defendants to six to 14 months in prison. Three other defendants
received suspended sentences and fines. Another two defendants were let go since
they were juveniles when the photo was taken. Some of the defendants say they
will consider appealing the verdict, the Czech News Agency reported.

The photo was taken in a Teplice bar in 2004 during a birthday party. It
later appeared on the Web site of the leftist organization Antifa.

The defendants told the court Tuesday they do not remember why the Nazi flag
was at the party and said they are not members of any extremist groups. They
said the picture was not taken to be distributed.

_______

Aholah Dan Sanhedrin and their
minions of hell Chabad, oppose the Road Map to Hell , Obama WILL fail.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/131419

Lubavitchers to Join DC Protest Against Palestinian State

by Malkah Fleisher

(IsraelNN.com) Large numbers of Chabad Chassidim from
World Lubavitch Headquarters at 770 Eastern Parkway in Brooklyn, New York, are
expected to join in a massive protest against the creation of a Palestinian
state on Monday, traveling to Washington DC by bus to express their outrage in
front of the White House.

Publicized on the popular Chabad website Chabad.info, Chabad Chassidim are
invited to board free buses from Crown Heights and Manhattan for a
day-long excursion to Washington, marked as a protest and show of support for
Israel.

Timed to synchronize with Israeli Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu's first diplomatic visit in Washington since the
assumption of the US presidency by Barack Hussein Obama, the May 18 protest
will elaborate spiritual and security reasons why the establishment of a
Palestinian Authority state on land biblically assigned to the Jewish people
would bring disastrous results.

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the spiritual
leader of Chabad Lubavitch and a rabbi accepted by many as the greatest of the
last generation, adamantly opposed the surrender of Israeli land tracts to
other nations, and argued that Israeli politicians should not even discuss the
possibility.

In the book 'When Silence Is a Sin,' published hastily by Sichos
in English in 2005 in a bid to thwart the expulsion of Jews from the Gaza
region's Gush Katif communities by the Sharon government, Rabbi Schneerson
emphasized the spiritual value of Jews uniting in protest against schemes of
enemy nations.

Moment of Silence, please

He also urged Jews to settle all parts of the Land of Israel, establishing
synagogues, Torah study centers, and mikvahs wherever they go, as a means of
forestalling international pressure and providing security for Jews in the Land
of Israel. Furthermore, the Lubavitcher Rebbe
suggested that settlement of all parts of Israel by Jews would even affect the
other nations of the world, who would come to reject evil and assist the Jews as
a result.

Monday's protest will seek to impart these and other messages to the Israeli
and U.S. leaders in Washington.

According to organizers and co-participants in the demonstration, U.S.-based
AMCHA and well-known activist Yosef Rabin, numerous
reasons should encourage Netanyahu to reject U.S. pressure to create a
Palestinian Authority state.

To set up the world's 24th Muslim state, say organizers, approximately
300,000 Jews would be forcibly expelled from their homes in Judea and Samaria.
The surrender of the Judea-Samarian mountain range would leave almost all of
Israel's major cities exposed to attack, not to mention the Temple Mount and its
environs. Also at risk, say protest leaders, is Israel's water supply,
one-third of which would be transferred to Arab control as a part of land
concessions.

Convicted murderers, criminals, and terrorists would also be released back to
Arab society as part of a state deal, further endangering Jews.

Those interested in joining the protest are encouraged to meet the group at
Lafayette Park across from the White House from 10:00 am to 3:00 pm, rain or
shine.

America, They are robbing you blind. They Have enacted
their Treasonous Murderous Laws upon you land unto their g-d wannabe the
Murderer from the beginning. For Jesus Namesake they seek to slay any who will
now bow to their Talmudic World Odor. But justly deserved for your abject
complacency, for you are become lethargic, saying the Name Jesus, and Lord Lord,
but your hearts have grossed cold and your lips only say Jesus. So it is and
rightly so, Judeo-Churchinsanity, for Judgment has begun in the House of the
LORD.

_______

Mt:23:15: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/131420

Christians Join Jews in Washington to Fight PA State

by Hana Levi Julian

(IsraelNN.com) A powerful Christian activist group joined thousands of
Jews Monday at a massive rally in Washington DC to protest the Obama
administrations pressure on Israel to accept the establishment of a
Palestinian Authority state within its current borders.

The Christian Friends of Israeli Communities (CFOIC Heartland), which links
Israeli towns in Judea and Samaria with Christian churches and individual
sponsors around the world, launched its internet initiative over the weekend.

The group urged its members to contact the White House and oppose President
Barack Obamas plan to pressure Israel into dividing the country with the
Palestinian Authority.

It also urged members to show up en masse for the rally, scheduled to
last from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.  the same time, approximately, that Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is set to meet with President Obama at the White
House.

The email, sent to a list of tens of thousands of people, informed members
that the White House has been pressuring Israel to agree to a two-state
solution in exchange for U.S. cooperation against Iran.

Iran poses an existential threat to Israel and to the entire free
world, noted the statement, signed by U.S. CFOIC director Kimberly Troup
and Israeli office director Sandra Oster Baras.

The two-state solution is synonymous with full Israeli withdrawal from
the heart of Biblical Israel. This poses an existential threat as well
as a spiritual threat to the Nation of Israel.

We are calling on you to stand up for Israel and to stand against
Obama's plan. Appeasement of Arab tyranny is no solution at all Say
no to a two-state solution. Say yes to Biblical Israel!

They Reject Jesus Christ and the
"Chosen" seed of Abraham, who are they by Faith in Jesus Christ. They
are no Christ Believers, but two fold children of Hell

Galatians 3: 16: Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one,
And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17: And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18: For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
19: Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
20: Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
21: Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22: But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
23: But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25: But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.26: For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27: For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29: And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Netanyahu Sees Iran as Amalek, Advisor Says

(IsraelNN.com) An advisor to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has compared
Netanyahu's attitude towards Iran to the traditional Jewish view of Amalek, the
ultimate enemy which must be destroyed.

Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, writing in the New York Times Op-Ed
section Saturday, said that Netanyahu is not bluffing with regard to the
possibility of Israel attacking Iran. "His preoccupation with the Iranian
nuclear program seems sincere and deeply felt," Goldberg writes. "I
recently asked one of his advisers to gauge for me the depth of Mr.
Netanyahus anxiety about Iran. His answer:

'Think Amalek.'"

While Netanyahu is a non-observant Jew, the evocation of Amalek by an aide to
could be a hint that some religious feeling is nonetheless
coloring the Israeli government's view of the Iranian threat.

'Erase the memory of Amalek'
Amalek is a nation that wished to wipe out the Jews. It was the first to make
war against Israel, attacking the rear guard of the Israelites on their
deliverance from Egypt. Jewish tradition holds that the Amalekites are the
undying enemy of the Jews. It also showed the way to the other nations as to how
to destroy Israel.

Amalek are these Hassidim who are not the seed of Abraham,
by faith in Jesus Christ, and these are cowardly dogs have snuck up behind them
who are by faith the seed of the ONE SEED, Christ Jesus

Though no identifiable Amalekites remain in the world, the Torah commands the
Jews to wipe out every last vestige of the evil that Amalek represents. Every
year, when the Torah passage known as Zachor is read, Jews stream to their
synagogues to hear the verse, " 'Remember what Amalek did to you on the
way, upon your departure from Egypt'... 'You shall erase the memory of Amalek
from beneath the heavens, you shall not forget.'."

Goldberg also quotes "friends and advisers" of Netanyahu who say
that he took three lessons from his brother Yonatans death, in the heroic
raid on Entebbe in 1976: "The first is that those who
threaten Jews, and have the means to carry out their threats, should be
neutralized pre-emptively. The second is that no one will defend the Jews
except the Jews themselves. The third is that destiny has
chosen the Netanyahus to expose and battle anti-Semitism  before it reaches
the point of genocide."

Obama on Jews, U.S. and Holocaust
Another interesting quote that appears in Goldberg's piece is from President
Barack Obama. Goldberg writes that the talk of containing Iran after it acquires
a nuclear capacity "does not make the Israelis happy and, in fact, might
push them closer to executing a military strike." Obama "surely knows
this," he estimates, and quotes something Obama told him during last year's
presidential campaign:

I know that that there are those who would argue that in some ways America
has become a safe refuge for the Jewish people," Obama said, "but if
youve gone through the Holocaust, then that does not offer the same sense of
confidence and security as the idea that the Jewish people can take care of
themselves no matter what happens.

"There should be little doubt that, by the end of
this year, if no progress is made, Mr. Netanyahu will seriously consider
attacking Iran," Goldberg writes. If the quote from Obama is an accurate
one, perhaps tough U.S. action against Iran is a more realistic option than many
people currently think.

and even more MURDER for your wannabe
anti-Christ self chosen gods, and may God Bliss ya, Maraka

______

The Popus Dopus and the
Rib-eye

"My gawds bigger than your
g-d" Mexican Stand-off.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/131340

Rabbi Amars Response to Pope

(IsraelNN.com) Israels Chief Sephardi Rabbi, the Rishon Letzion
Rabbi Shlomo Amar, wore an unusual adornment at his meeting with the Pope in
Jerusalem on Tuesday.

Rabbi Amar met several days ago with one of his predecessors, Rabbi Ovadiah
Yosef, and discussed with him his feelings of discomfort about his upcoming
meeting with the Pope  because of the large golden
cross he wears on his chest.

Rabbi Amar generally wears, as did all his predecessors in his position of
Rishon LeTzion (The First of Zion), a black cloak adorned with a broad collar
and band of silver. This time, Rabbi Yosef advised Rabbi Amar to add a golden
adornment of his own: a golden-plated ornament depicting
the Tablets of the Law, topped with a crown.

Rabbi Amar took the advice, and the golden Tablets can clearly be seen in
the photos of the rabbis meeting.

The meeting took place at the titular headquarters of the Chief Rabbinate,
Heichal Shlomo in Jerusalem. Rabbi Amar also made sure to hold and consult a
book of Torah law during the meeting and follow-up speeches.

It should be noted that Rabbi Amars speech concentrated on the wondrous
return of the Jewish People to their homeland, still loyal to their Torah,
after nearly 2,000 years of exile. His Ashkenazi counterpart, Rabbi Yona
Metzger, made a similar point, but also directed specific demands at the Pope.
Rabbi Metzger asked that the Catholic Church help identify Jews given over as
children to Christian families during the Holocaust, and set aside one day a
year to speak out not only against anti-Semitism, but also in favor of the
Jewish people. He also thanked the Pope for stopping
missionary activity against the Jews.

A previous pontiff, Pope Paul VI, visited Israel in 1964, but refused to
come to Jerusalem  and in response, then-Chief Rabbi Yitzchak Nissim
refused to meet him at all.

Mt:23:13: But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Tel: 02-5661962, cell 050-6733831, fax: 057-7976007
47 Rachel Imeinu St. Jerusalem 93228
ב"ה
Rosh Hodesh Nissan, 5769
Letter from the Beit Din of the Sanhedrin
To the President of the State of Israel
To the Incoming Prime Minister Mr. Binyamin Netanyahu
To the Outgoing Prime Minister Mr. Ehud Olmert
Ministers and Members of Knesset

To the esteemed heads of state,
I have set watchmen upon thy walls, O Jerusalem, they shall never hold
their peace day nor night: 'You that make mention of the LORD, take no rest,
And give Him no rest, till He establish, and till He make Jerusalem a praise
in the earth.' The LORD has sworn by His right hand, and by the arm of His
strength: Surely I will no more give thy corn to be food for thy enemies;
and the sons of strangers shall not drink thy wine, for which thou hast
laboured.
Isaiah 62:6-8

Ooooops, that Whore was put away by God the
father......But he has a NEW, unblemished white Virgin Bride

Rv:3:12: Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.

Regarding the upcoming visit of the Pope
During the Lag BOmer season, Pope Benedict XVI is expected to visit the holy
sites of his religion and to put forward a series of agreements between the
Vatican and the State of Israel.

We would like to call your attention to the Sanhedrins stance on this
subject.
The State of Israel grants freedom of worship to every religion except the Jews
on their most sanctified site, the Temple Mount: there, they are granted neither
freedom of prayer nor minimal freedom of religion. The State of Israel thus
contradicts the purpose for which it was established and undermines its own
foundations.

In contrast the State of Israel makes special efforts to transfer its national,
religious, and spiritual assets to the sons of strangers.

For many years negotiations and contacts to reach agreements have been conducted
regarding what the Catholic Church sees as its property or desires for itself,
whether within previous confines such as Mt. Zion or within the Old City, the
Kinneret, and other places. Those who initiated the concept of the Holy
Basin principally intend to remove
exclusive Jewish sovereignty from the Temple Mount and the Old City and in
effect, aim at the total removal of Jewish sovereignty.

We expect you to be particularly watchful regarding Jerusalem as Passover
approaches lest our right hand forget its skill.

The government of Israel, as a Jewish government, must heighten awareness of the
freedom of the Jewish people more than ever on the holiday of Passover.

The State of Israel is also subject to the deed of ownership  the Bible -
according to which it claimed ownership of the land at its very establishment.
Therefore the government must actualize Jewish sovereignty in Jerusalem, the
city of God, the royal city, capital of Israel, heart of the world, and it must
guarantee the right of worship and prayer of Jews on the Temple Mount and
realize the obligation of Jews to bring the Passover sacrifice on the 14th of
Nissan on the eve of Passover, this year and every year. The Passover sacrifice
redeems Israel from spiritual excommunication and distinguishes between Israel
and the nations [Ex. 12: 27,43], and it is a shield and protection against all
of the unfounded demands of foreign nations to take possession of the land of
Israel along with us [Ex. 13]

That City is no City Of God, and certainly has no Lamb for passover which was
Provided

Mt:23:37: O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

Rv:21:2: And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Rv:21:10: And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,

It should be noted that the third President of the State of Israel, the late
Zalman Shazar, found the courage in 5723[1963] when Pope Pius IV visited Israel
to read him the verse from the Prophet Micha, chapter 4: For let all the
peoples walk each one in the name of its god, but we will walk in the name of
the LORD our God for ever and ever. Israels Chief Rabbis at that time
protected the honor of Israel and refused to meet the pope.

In 5760 [2000] Pope John Paul II visited Jerusalem. During his visits attempts
were made by various agents to remove Israeli sovereignty from the Temple Mount,
in an effort to demonstrate the sovereignty of a foreign rule and to allow the
visit to take place without the presence of any representative of Israel on the
holiest site of Judaism. These attempts failed because of vigorous public
objections.

The Rabbi of the Holy Sites and of the Kotel, Rav Shmuel Rabinovitz, has
demonstrated commendable behavior in refusing to stop Jewish prayer at the Kotel
during the present Popes visit, which is scheduled for Lag BOmer.

The speedy reconciliation with the Pope after a series of unfortunate statements
that he made against us does no honor to the People of Israel. All of the
political and Torah authorities must do whatever they can to prevent the signing
or holding of any agreement that deviates from the spirit of this document and
must express their disapproval at the Catholic Restorationist trends whose aim
is to nullify the sovereign power of the State of Israel and the status of the
Jewish People, the People of Israel in the Land of Israel, its holy land.

Please clarify your position to your people, to the State, and to the entire
world.
Show respect for the God of your forefathers, your city, and your nation and do
not act grovel submissively before foreigners and disparage the stature of the
people of Israel.

In these difficult days we face a danger from Iran and the
entire region working together with the seventy nations of the world, pushing us
to continue to retreat. This only diminishes Jews, the nation, and the
State of Israel and does irreversible damage to our deterrent power.
Let all of the nations of the world see that My name is called upon you, and
they shall fear you .

Ever since the liberation of Jerusalem as a unified city by the Israeli Defense
Forces in 5727 [1967] the nations and religions of the world have not reconciled
themselves to the sovereignty and restoration of the Jewish people in their
eternal capital where the Temple will eventually be
rebuilt to serve the God of Israel, God of the world, and a king of Israel will
again rule, a descendant of King David.

Moshiach, False Christ they await

Especially ever since the Oslo Accords in 5753 [1993], the Vatican acting as a
state with theological views, signed a series of secret documents1
with various agents in the State of Israel - behind the back of the citizens 
These agents are totally devoid of any respect for the spiritual and diplomatic
status of the Jewish people, and their main goal is to transfer Jewish national
assets in Jerusalem to the hands of foreigners and to promote measures that will
undermine the religious and political ownership of the People of Israel over
their holy sites: first and foremost, the Temple Mount, the Kotel, and the
entire Old City of Jerusalem, transferring them to the Vatican and international
agents, which will inevitable seize them territorially from the State of Israel
. Thus, too, is the plan for other sites in our holy land.

The Beit Din of the Sanhedrin declares that the
representatives of the State of Israel may represent the Jewish People as long
as they are acting as representatives of the Jewish People over history in
accordance with its tradition and laws. Insofar as this is not the case, their
representation is not legitimate.

These representatives, even if they are acting in the manner of the kings of
Judah Hezekiah and Zedekiah who showed the treasures of the Holy Temple to the
agents of foreign powers, are not authorized to transfer ownership or absolute
tenancy to lands and buildings in the Land of Israel to any foreign religious or
political agent.

Therefore all of the documents which were drawn up by such representatives with
the Vatican as a theological and diplomatic agents in opposition to the
spiritual essence of the People of Israel are void. All of the agreements with
the Vatican which have been made or will be made in this spirit are null and
void and the Vatican should not believe that they will retain them. The Vatican
as the head of all Christian church is responsible for the legacy of Rome which
occupied Jerusalem, dispossessed its Jews, and destroyed their land. All
of the Christian churches currently standing in Jerusalem are the product of the
destruction of the Jewish people, their dispossession and exile to the Christian
exile which Christianity glorifies in as being everlasting. This is in
addition to the priceless treasures, both material and spiritual, belonging to
the Jews which lie in the cellars of the Vatican, and the countless synagogues
all over the world which were confiscated by the Vatican and its representatives
and never returned to their rightful owners.
Anyone who negotiates and signs any agreement to change the status of the State
of Israel in its holy sites in Jerusalem and the Land of Israel is raising his
hand against the Torah, against his own faith, his people, his land, against his
own homeland and against the home of his fathers.

There is a strict prohibition against approving any agreement that transfers
state ownership to foreigners, and this has been set forth in the criminal code
of the State of Israel.

Continuing to seek favor in the eyes of the Church by making illegal agreements
might end, God forbid, in devastating religious wars all over the world.Signatories

Chabad rabbi aims to clarify remarks on killing civilians

Rabbi Manis Friedman has come under intense criticism
for appearing to call on Israel to massacre Palestinians. (Sholom/Wikipedia/GNU)

NEW YORK (JTA) -- A prominent Chabad rabbi is seeking to clarify remarks in
which he renounced Western morality and seemed to call on Israel to
massacre Palestinian civilians.

"The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way," wrote Rabbi
Manis Friedman in the current issue of Moment magazine. "Destroy their holy
sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle).

Friedman's comments were a response to the question How Should Jews Treat
Their Arab Neighbors? The question was posed to rabbis of several
denominations, and the Friedman response was identified as Chabad.

Subsequently he said that the comments were solely his own and not those of
any movement or organization. A Chabad spokesperson also emphasized that
Friedman was not speaking for the organization.

Note that Sanhedrin has stated the exact same position,
and Beware

In a clarification
issued through a Chabad spokesperson, Friedman, of St. Paul, Minn., said that he
assumed it was "obvious" that the Torah requires peaceful non-Jewish
neighbors to be treated "with respect and compassion." Instead,
Friedman said that he chose to address a different question: how Jews
should act "in time of war, when our neighbors attack us, using
their women, children and religious holy places as shields."

Friedman said that he had been attempting to "briefly address some of
the ethical issues related to forcing the military to withhold fire from certain
people and places, at the unbearable cost of widespread bloodshed (on both
sides!) -- when ones own family and nation is mercilessly targeted from those
very people and places!

Friedman added: I apologize for any misunderstanding the words printed in
my name created.

Subsequent to the clarification, Chabad issued a statement that it
"vehemently" disagreed with the notion "that Judaism allows for
the wanton destruction of civilian life, even when at war."

Liars whose father is the Liar they serve

Interpreted as a call on Israel to carry out massive killings of
Palestinians, bloggers seized on the Moment article, with several seeing it as a
confirmation of what they view as Chabad's extremism.

Shmarya Rosenberg, a perennial critic of Chabad, wrote on his blog,
FailedMessiah.com, that he had heard this exact logic from Friedman
himself.

Rabbi Avi Shafran, the director of public affairs for the fervently Orthodox
group Agudath Israel, called Friedman's comments shocking and wrongheaded.

Divine commandments in the Torah that were intended for a particular time
and place, as all the 'war commandments' were, are not properly applied to any
other situations -- and throughout history never have been, Shafran said.
Torah speaks to contemporary situations only through the judgments of the
greatest religious leaders of the day.

A noted author, speaker and educator, Friedman is among the country's most
prominent Chabad rabbis. He has appeared on CNN, PBS and the BBC, and been the
subject of articles in major national publications, according to his biography.

A 1974 New York Times article article about Friedman's school, Bais Chana,
described him as using humble humor in his interactions with young women
who are returning to Jewish practice, many of them having dropped out of school
or become hooked on drugs.

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5769_Tevet_10

Psak 5769 Tevet 10

From The Sanhedrin - en

The Sanhedrin, being the authorized institution to decide in military
matters, issues definitive moral guidance on this matter and addresses the
current administration's defense policy.

Informal translation from Hebrew of the 10 Tevet, 5769 (6 January 2009)
statement:

The entire country must share joint responsibility for the current military
action in the Gaza Strip and for the likelihood that it will end without a clear
defeat of our enemy.

Consideration by Israel to signing a ceasefire agreement with the PLO/Hamas
terrorist organizations under the aegis of international or local proposals
testifies to the short-sighted political view of the Israel government and its
clouded horizon of the countrys future. Conclusion of
battle must come only when the enemy is unable to fight.

The remark by President Elect Obama regarding the reciprocal responsibility
of the current fighting shows a lack of moral understanding and bodes ill for
fundamental Israeli and world interests.

If the present military action is not concluded categorically, the Israeli
population will suffer the severe results of continuing attacks and from the
inept handling of the political side of this battle. This responsibility falls
on Jewry as a whole who did not come out in mass to prevent the 2005 destruction
of the Jewish villages in the Gaza Strip and northern Shomron. They allowed
themselves to be lulled by empty promises of Peace in our Times
repeated by corrupt politicians, often, to find favor in the eyes of
post-Zionist law-enforcement officials, who were pleased to delay the
pressing of criminal charges.

A Crime took place: The destruction of thriving villages in the Gaza Strip
and northern Shomron and deportation of their populations.

The Punishment came in its time: The Arab bombardment of cities and townships
from Ashdod to Beer-Sheva, loss of Jewish lives, disfiguring injuries, and
destruction of Israeli property, paralysis of life in most of the southern third
of the country  and the lack of will to restore the destroyed communities to
their past glory.

As Josephs brothers said to one another: 'We are verily guilty concerning
our brother, in that we saw the distress of his soul, when he besought us, and
we would not hear; therefore is this distress come upon us; And Reuben
answered them, saying: 'Spoke I not unto you, saying: Do not sin against the
child; and ye would not hear? therefore also, behold, his blood is required.
[Gen 24,21-22].

In addition to our responsibility, the current military action in the Gaza
Strip reflects a series of mistakes in all fields: in policy making, media
relations, military planning, and moral cognition. Beside the obvious need to
destroy Hamas, which caused the opening of the current military action, it is
obvious to the objective observer that political considerations also had their
say. The upcoming elections were a primary factor, since it was clear to the
Minister of Defense that his party was losing electoral support and he could not
allow rockets to continue to spoil his chances of strengthening his partys
position. [In fact, the popularity of the Minister and his party increased by
more than 50% since the beginning of the war.]

However, we foresee political failure if a premature ceasefire is adopted
because the government did not coherently formulate the goals of its military
action:

The government did not clearly identify the enemy;

It did not commit to defeat and remove the enemy;

It did not define victory; and

It did not describe how to consolidate the wars achievements.

The present Israeli government  in ignorance  calls the civilian
populace in the Gaza Strip innocent bystanders. But this populace voted
overwhelmingly to be ruled over by the Hamas, whose fundamental, well-publicized
doctrine is the destruction of the state of Israel and the killing of Jews as a
religious Islamic goal. Israels people have the full right of engaging
in a war of self-defense against a political entity with such aims, especially
after this entity shoots, shells and targets rockets at the Israel populace for
over eight years.

Indeed, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has modified one of the self-imposed
limitations that characterized its previous engagements: in the current battle,
Israel has attacked all places from which the enemy has attacked our people, and
all places in which enemy munitions are stored  even mosques (which is in
accordance with international laws). Nevertheless, the IDF still behaves as if
the blood of Arabs is worth more than that of Israeli soldiers or civilians.
This attitude lies at the basis of the decision  against the advice of
eminent military experts  not to purchase the Vulcan-Phalanx electrically
powered Gatling gun for Israeli troops or the Israel-US-developed Nautilus
Tactical High Energy Laser System, known to be successful in downing rockets and
projectiles. Such ordinance would have proved very useful and saved many IDF and
civilian casualties.

Necessary Action and Prevention

A. To act according to the lesson taught by King David [Psalms 18,38]: I have
pursued mine enemies, and overtaken them; neither did I turn back till they were
consumed, namely, there is no ceasefire until every city and town of the enemy
surrenders.

B. No placing of international forces in Gaza to enforce security;

C. No Egyptian forces to be permitted into the Gaza Strip;

D. Temporary Military Rule should be established to maintain order;

E. The local population will be encouraged to undertake
voluntary emigration from the Gaza Strip to whichever countries are willing to
accept them. The travel costs will be paid by the Military Rule. This
will be a humane solution for the difficult economic situation.

F. A basic constitution will be established, based upon
the seven Noahide Laws, which will also be a central aspect of the educational
system. This legal foundation includes, among other things, the
prohibition against murder or suicide, as well as the incitement to these
crimes.

G. All areas of the strip that had Israeli homes and villages will be rebuilt
and annexed to Israel, as written in Deuteronomy 11,31-32: For ye are to pass
over the Jordan to go in to possess the land which the LORD your God giveth you,
and ye shall possess it, and dwell therein, And ye shall observe to do all the
statutes and the ordinances which I set before you this day.

We encourage, strengthen and bless the Israel Defense Forces and the other
security personnel in their efforts on behalf of Israel, and pray that no harm
will befall them. May they recover our country from our enemies; and enable us
to live in the whole of the Land promised by the Almighty to the Jewish people.

Rabbi Dov Stein - Secretary

_______

The "Keel em all" world
today

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5769_Shevat_9

Psak 5769 Shevat 9

From The Sanhedrin - en

The Sanhedrin, being the authorized institution to
decide in military matters, issues definitive moral guidance on this
matter and addresses the current administration's defense policy.

Informal translation from Hebrew of the 9 Shevat, 5769 (3 February 2009)
statement:

Commission of enquiry regarding the results of the military
action Operation Cast Lead in Gaza during winter 5769 (2009)

10 Shvat 5769
3 February 2009

The Beit Din of the Sanhedrin decided, when in convened on 2 Shvat 5759
(27 January 2009) to establish a commission of enquiry into the various aspects
of the military operation in Gaza and to publish the intermediate results given
the reasons detailed below.

The Beit Din of the Sanhedrin released its decisions in the matter of Israel
Defense Forces military actions in Gaza and its intensity on 10 Tevet,
included as an addendum to this document. It concluded that there is a necessity
to unconditionally subdue the enemy, i.e., all terrorist
organizations and those who support them, throughout Gaza, and indicated
that there were no goals determined for the war. Likewise, it determined that a
temporary military administration for Gaza should be implemented.

Approximately three weeks after the Israeli government decided to cease the
military operation, the Beit Din thought it appropriate to state, as a
preliminary decision, the immediate findings until the publication of the full
findings of the commission of enquiry of the Sanhedrin. It did this because of
the serious consequences that come to light daily, and the growing influence of
election concerns on actions, and the oversights in the Gaza Strip.

The commission of enquiry for the Sanhedrin works jointly with and in
consultation with experts on military and security issues who desire to remain
anonymous.

Contents

Preliminary conclusions:

The prevailing public impression is that the general military readiness had
improved. This is because both the fighting morale and readiness of the soldiers
of the Israel Defense Force reflected the internalization of the conclusions as
a result of the war in Lebanon.

The improvements are evident in the planning of the war, the evaluation in
the field, the logistics and the supplies.

In the necessary changes in the attitude of the military which got rid of
pronouncements that demoralized it for many years with respect to the faulty
ethics code which the military had adopted.

Additionally, the military neither showed disregard for human life, nor
deliberately harmed the enemys civilian population, as has come to light one
after the other in various incidents, and investigations.

With the completion of the war, the propaganda of the media and its
associates

comes to demoralize the army, like with the incident
of the doctor and his three daughters, and threatens to return it to a military
that is beaten with feelings of guilty and lacking the ability to fight.

Also, the incident with the Spanish governments attempt to take to court
senior officers of the Israel Defense Force and additional threats  these are
the fruits of the efforts of these associates whose intention is to undermine
the existence of a Jewish state, among other things to weaken its military and
demoralize it.

The Government and Operation Cast Lead:

A) Both the governments decision regarding the war, which after the fact
one can deduce that it had not determined the wars goals but rather indicated
vague goals that changed from day to day (e.g., changing the face of the
reality in the south as opposed to displacing Hamas), and the
dissolution of the war in actuality, testify of a significant shrinking back
from a decisive victory which has only one expression: the unconditional victory
over the terrorist organizations in Gaza.

B) This is not only the fault of this government but the logical result, the
rotten fruit, of a national amnesia, regarding both a sense of self and
ethically. This will, from the outset, paralyze the military in any operation or
war, and will likely continue to influence the decisions of the upcoming
government. This is an expression of a behavior pattern that stems from feelings
of guilt, the legitimization of the enemy, and a lack of knowing what to do if,
G-d forbid, there would be a victory.

C) The root of this amnesia, which comes from an unjustified sense of guilt,
stems from a lack of an inward recognition of the absolute stewardship of the
people Israel over the Land of Israel that comes from the strength of holiness
of the people and the Land as it is reflected in the Israels faith, the
Torah, and the Creator of the world.

The strength of them who are self righteous, who covets
MURDER for their father who is the Murderer from the beginning, and is no
LIFEGIVER, Christ Jesus, whom they crucified

D) This significant shortcoming is one of education. The political parties
that speak of the importance of education are not speaking of this shortcoming
as the main source for the various aspects of the failure of wars, in the arena
of the political and legal.

E) On the other hand, in the military arena, the attitude of religious faith
strengthens the army that fights, and places its marks positively on the
behavior of the soldiers, both in their prayers and their behavior as soldiers.
Such expressions, however, are seen as naught in the eyes of those who are
assimilated. From this aspect, the demographic change among the core of the
solders aids security. The problem is that these soldiers filled with faith in
the rightness of our way in our land are directed by weak politicians who seek
the support of the minority in our country, the children of the people of Hamas.

F) Despite the improved military capability, the security and political
situations of Israel have worsened as a result of Operation Cast Lead. The
principal reason for this worsening situation stems from the messages of the
various governments of Israel since the end of the Six Day War. These messages
by means of various decisions repudiated the national rights of the people
Israel in its own land, and by so doing fanned the fires of those who hate
Israel. As an example of this is the decision of the Eshkol government in 5727
(1967) to see various districts of the land as deposits for returning to the
enemy by means of negotiation.

G) Standing before the government which will come to
power, G-d willing, after the elections,

(Netanyahu their Choice for MURDER for Hire)are
very difficult problems and a limited room to maneuver both in the area of
international relations, and regional security relating to Iran and nuclear
weapons, and Egypt. An additional difficulty exists which prevents the
determination of the Israel Defense Forces goals of warfare for the future
that is apparent and appropriate for these goals  its readiness.

H) The Israel Defense Force was managed with such hand wringing that it could
not subdue the enemy, and stopped itself as a result of the confused political
statements that were given in the last days of the war, similar to the second
Lebanon war, fearing a loss of the minorities to the ruling parties in the
elections.

I) Meanwhile, the objectives of fighting related to the enemy, whether in
guerilla warfare, or warfare against local, regional or global terrorist
organizations, or against terrorist nations or enemy nations, are beyond the
horizon of the various administrations of the country and of the Israel Defense
Force, and therefore one must expect difficult situations, even to the extent of
being dragged into an unconventional war whose cost of lives is a price neither
the state of Israel nor the Jewish people can afford.

J) There cannot be any appropriate objectives for either war or peace for the
Israel Defense Force or the state of Israel as long as one accepts as legitimate
the Oslo peace process of 1993 and the particular ethos of peace
that developed from the start with the establishment of the Yishuv in the late
19th century.

K) The concept of peace of Israel is derived from the essential
legitimacy of the duty of the Jewish people to conquer,
take possession of its land, and displace its enemies  all of this is to be
done as a condition of very existence of the people Israel in the land of
Israel, and principally to settle in the land.

run the Palestinians into
the sea....."keel em all"

And you shall take possession of the land and settle in it, for I have
assigned the land to you to possess. You shall apportion the land among
yourselves by lot, clan by clan, with larger groups increase the share, with
smaller groups reduce the share. Wherever the lot falls for anyone, that shall
be his. You shall have your portions according to your ancestral tribes. But if
you do not dispossess the inhabitants of the land, those whom you allow to
remain shall be stings in your eyes and thorns in your sides, and they shall
harass you in the land in which you live, so that I will do to you what I
planned to do to them. (Bemidbar / Deuteronomy 33: 53-56)

K) Uppermost in the thoughts of assimilated Zionism is to turn the people
Israel into a nation like all others. It sees in the possessing of the land and
its settling as the foundation that signifies the Jewish people as a religious
people that functions within its national tradition. The propaganda of these
groups was a negative influence, regretfully, on deeply rooted Jews.

L) Therefore there could not have been an appropriate outcome for Operation
Cast Lead, this despite eight years of restraint, and definitive warnings of
those in protest.

The bitter results are necessarily the shedding of more of the blood of our
soldiers, G-d forbid, and of the enemys population, when, in each military
operation, we can expect it only to worsen.

The Gilad Shalit incident:

A) Based on the reactions of the politicians on 9 Shvat, they are ready to
submit to the demands of Hamas regarding Gilad Shalit within the context of the
freeing of many dangerous murderers. As part of the goal to arrive at an agreed
upon joint statement with Egypt one day prior to the elections, this appears as
a crude attempt to interfere with its results.

B) The price that both current and previous politicians are willing to pay
for the release of captives, like with Jibril and the transaction that involved
him, who gave both encouragement in a significant manner to the sense of success
for the monstrous murderers, and additional power to them, and to the increasing
of worldwide terror, testifies to the diminishing of the image of G-d in Israel.
These agreements caused the desecration of G-ds Name, and are a factor in the
loss of deterrence and respect of Israel, and their results are incomparable
bloodshed everywhere a Jew is found. In the summer of 5766 / 2006, the Beit Din
of the Sanhedrin determined, regarding the abduction of Gilad Shalit (See the
second addendum), the maximal ethical limits of an agreement for his release by
the terrorists. This was that not more than seven terrorists without blood on
their hands can be turned over in exchange for an Israeli soldier.

______

http://www.thesanhedrin.org/en/index.php/Psak_5768_Adar_II_5

Psak 5768 Adar II 5

From The Sanhedrin - en

The Sanhedrin, being the authorized institution to decide in military
matters, issues definitive moral guidance on this matter and addresses the
current administration's defense policy. This ruling not only derides the
government for failing to use internationally accepted means for battling a
wartime enemy, but also raises concern about the possible use of security forces
to manipulate public opinion.[1]

After the slaughter in the "Merkaz HaRav" rabbinical
college [in Jerusalem], Concerning military retaliation

The Jews are not sheep, and they will not go like lambs to the butcher. The
Jewish people will find the way to strike at their enemies. The Jewish people
have tremendous patience in this matter.

Military reprisals are not disallowed [by law]. Indeed it is a legal
consideration in any system of law. When a proper hearing is not possible [such
as wartime situations, or where the combatants are not part of any legal
system], reprisals are one of the principles of maintaining justice, and derive
from the rights of man and his basic freedoms; there is not a legal system that
does not recognize and define the legal limits of reprisals. [As our sages have
said:] Great is the retribution that is given between the two names of G-d, as
it is said "O L-rd, Thou G-d to whom vengeance belongeth, Thou G-d to whom
vengeance belongeth, shine forth". (Psalms 94:1)

Insofar as the defense forces do not strive for justice from our enemies, they
abandon the legal obligation of retaliation [against rouge combatants, or a
state which has declared war against us] to others. In the same measure
that the government of the Jewish State does not function as a government of the
Jewish people, rather as a government that renounces [its rights] -- in exactly
the same measure it abandons its responsibility to safeguard the Jewish people.

[Instead of the government invoking its right, it neutralizes any opposition
by turning a well defined legal course of action into extremism.] The security
establishment announces that there is incitement in the air. In every instance
of terrorism, there is fear to take any retaliatory action, what is different
today than yesterday?! Why does the security establishment see fit to send out
warnings now more than during any other instance of terrorist mass murder?!

Just like the days that preceded the still unexplained assassination of
Rabin, there were notices by the security establishment, apparently at the
instigation of Prime Minister Rabin himself, through his agents (as determined
by the government's own Shamgar inquiry), showing Rabin in the clothes of the
Nazi S.S.

Also today, the representatives of the security establishment do not cease to
talk, "As a dog that returns to his vomit, [so a fool repeats his
folly]." (Proverbs 26:11). They return to flood the public's mind with
"Rabbis who seek revenge", saying "these are instigators seeking
to provoke a civil war". Thus people who are trying to follow Jewish law
are divorced and stigmatized by the public, thrown outside public consensus. It
is difficult to hide from the nagging thought that the reporters who publish
these article in such language, are themselves working in cooperation, and
perhaps as agents of [a politically motivated] security establishment.

We know with certainty that G-d will find a way to exact retribution in His
own way and to its fullest extent, as it is written: "I am magnified and
sanctified before the eyes of many nations". This [divine] retribution is
more terrible than any terrorist attack. The Rabbis do not wipe clean the guilt
of those who enable such destruction, the Israeli elite who chase after the
Jewish people to make them their tool. Even if we do not lift a finger, there is
no forgetfulness before G-d.

Those who ran away from Gaza, from Lebanon, and from the Temple Mount, and
who today run away from Jerusalem; those who dishonor the name of God before the
nations; those who portray Israel as a conquer of nations - it is these who
bring upon us destruction. Those who bring murderers to our land to dwell here,
deep will be their punishment.

May the students and teachers of the rabbinical college Merkaz HaRav, live
and be blessed -- that did not warmly greet those who deal subversively with
their murderers.

References

↑ PsyOps or Psychological
Warfare Operations are units of the military designed to swing public
opinion. Special agents known as 'provocateurs' are trained to blend in with
the crowd, dress as civilians, and show up at carefully coordinated times
with the camera crews to create a media 'happening'. Although rare, their
use in Israel is documented: "This week the Israeli PsyOps division was
reassembled after being largely dormant for five years." IDF
reviving psychological warfare unit, by Amos Harel, Haaretz
Correspondent, January 25, 2005. It is not clear that the manipulation of
public opinion of civilians by security forces is considered illegal (as it
is in many countries) or even unethical by secular Israeli law.

______

Nothing ever
changes with the Pharisees, Hypocrites and Vipers

Mt:23:13: But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

Mt:23:15: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Mt:23:23: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

Mt:23:25: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

Mt:23:27: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.

Mt:23:29: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3727872,00.html

Haredi volunteers to operate mobiles
with teeth

Special halachic ruling
permits emergency service volunteers to reply to calls on their mobile phone
during weekends by operating the device with their teeth

The issue of working on Shabbat presents a difficult dilemma for the
ultra-orthodox workers and volunteers of the Magen David Adom emergency
services. A recently-issued halachic ruling now permits on-call volunteers to
activate their mobile phones on weekends, provided that they do so using their
teeth.

MDA has lately began replacing its workers' old beepers with modern MIRS
mobile phones equipped with GPS technology, which enables the dispatch center to
locate the volunteers closest to the scene of an accident, thus shortening the
emergency teams' response time.

Innovative solution (Photo:
Haim Zach)

But the switch to the new technology has created a problem for the haredi
volunteers, who were concerned that the use of the MIRS device on weekends will
amount to Shabbat desecration. Some ultra-Orthodox leaders have even called on
the volunteers to keep their old beepers.

In an attempt to resolve this dilemma, MDA approached the head of the
Scientific-Technological Halacha Institute, Rabbi Levy Yitzhak Halperin.
Halperin permitted the use of the new mobile phones, but stipulated a series of
conditions for this: The devices will remain open at all times during weekends
and placed in a specially-designed case which will not enable them to shut down
accidentally.

On Shabbat and holidays, on-call volunteers will respond to calls by using a
small metal pin, which they will place between their teeth and use to press the
buttons and confirm their arrival.

"Magen David Adom is committed to adopting the GPS technology while
making sure not to disrupt the lifestyle and customs of the volunteers,"
said MDA Director Genera Eli Bin.

_______

you are done,
Maraka...and rightly so......

http://www.rense.com/general86/d33n.htm

Justice Scalia Cites The Talmud
An Exegesis by Michael Hoffman

6-9-9

Supreme Court Opinion: Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co

In a 5-4 decision released on June 8, 2009, the Supreme
Court ruled for the first time that the Constitution can require an elected
judge to step aside in a particular case based on campaign spending in state
judicial races. The majority ruling in Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.,
No. 08-22, was written by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy. Joining Chief Justice
John G. Roberts Jr. in dissent were Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas
and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

In his dissent Scalia wrote:

"A Talmudic maxim instructs with respect to the
Scripture: "Turn it over, and turn it over, for all is therein."
The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Aboth, Ch. V, Mishnah 22 (I. Epstein ed.
1935).

"Divinely inspired text may contain the answers to
all earthly questions, but the Due Process Clause most assuredly does not.

"The Court today continues its quixotic quest to
right all wrongs and repair all imperfections through the Constitution.

"Alas, the quest cannot succeed-which is why some
wrongs and imperfections have been called nonjusticiable. In the best of all
possible worlds, should judges sometimes recuse even where the clear
commands of our prior due process law do not require it? Undoubtedly.

"The relevant question, however, is whether we do
more good than harm by seeking to correct this imperfection through
expansion of our constitutional mandate in a manner ungoverned by any
discernable rule. The answer is obvious."

Michael Hoffman's Analysis

Rabbi Ben Bag Bag in the Mishnah passage cited by Scalia
is allegedly referring to constant rabbinic analysis of the Torah. Scalia
claims that the rabbi is saying it is necessary to analyze the Torah over
and over; by doing so one will discover all truth and wisdom therein. Scalia
seems to be stating one can't say the same about a single clause of the
Constitution.

The majority of the justices from whom Scalia dissents
have ruled that it is their understanding of the "Due Process
Clause" that a judge who is obligated to a donor in some circumstances
must recuse himself from a case involving the donor.

Scalia "seems" to be saying (one can't be
absolutely certain because his writing, far from being "obvious,"
suffers from the legalese that lawyer/priests routinely use to obscure their
judgments), that certain judges treat the Constitution as if it were
Scripture. They search a single clause in the Constitution for truth and
wisdom like rabbis search a single verse from a "Divinely inspired
text."

Scalia's ruling seems to be a species of liberal
anarchism: one can't find truth and wisdom in too close a study of the
Constitution. He appears to be stating that unlike the Bible, the
Constitution is not so authoritative that it contains everything necessary
to reach a correct legal decision, and unlike rabbis, who are right to
"Turn it over, and turn it over, for all is therein," Supreme
Court justices are wrong to put this emphasis on the Constitution.

There are other significant problems with Scalia's
employment of the Talmud text in this context, including but not limited to
his abysmal ignorance of the Talmud, which probably is due to the fact that
he is a goy who studies the Talmud with Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis who are not
exactly paragons of integrity when it comes to parsing the mysteries of the
Talmud for the sake of the goyim.

1. Within the context of Scalia's opinion we must ask, if
the Constitution cannot be relied on to this degree, to what degree can it
be relied on and what are the limits of its authority?

2. Since the rabbis falsify the Bible with their Talmudic
exegesis, and since their self-ordained mandate to "repair all
imperfections" (tikkun olam) is based on the intervention of Judaic
brain power to "improve" and "correct" God's supposedly
flawed creation, Scalia's analogy fails as a model dichotomy of proper and
improper attitudes toward enshrined texts.

3. Based on Scalia's past utterances and the prestige he
lends to rabbinic gatherings by his uncritical presence at their meetings,
we feel certain that Scalia does not understand how tikkun olam is actually
perceived and implemented in the rabbinic universe. He has accepted the
rabbinic cover story at face value.

4. Scalia's choice of the obsolete and opaque 1935 Epstein
English translation of the Mishnah as his citation for the quote he uses,
rather than Jacob Neusner's vastly superior 1988 Mishnah translation (Yale
University Press), tends to indicate how atrophied is his knowledge of the
Talmud and its variant texts.

5. In point of fact, the particular Mishnah passage cited
by Justice Scalia is a description of the "traits of the disciples of
Abraham" as compared unfavorably with the "traits of the disciples
of Balaam" (cf. Mishnah Abot 5, III; Neusner pp. 688-689).

In the Talmud, Balaam is a codeword for Jesus (see my book
(http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=10060)

Judaism Discovered, pp. 392-395, though this is hotly
denied by the ADL and similar Zionist and rabbinic thought police).
Consequently, Justice Scalia is quoting what the Mishnah says are character
traits which are the opposite of those of the wicked Jesus
("Balaam").

If one does not wish to join the Christians, i.e. the
"disciples of Balaam" who "inherit Gehenna and go down to the
Pit of Destruction" (Mishnah Abot 5:19), one must, declares Rabbi Ben
Bag Bag: "Turn it over and over because everything is in it and reflect
upon it and grow old and worn in it and do not leave it" (Mishnah Abot
5:22; this is a complete quotation of the fragment cited by Scalia).

If we examine the verse that precedes Mishnah Abot 5:22 (Mishnah
Abot 5:21) we discover that it contains an allusion to the primacy of the
Mishnah and the Talmud. Hence, it is not at all clear that the text that
Rabbi Bag Bag advises one to "turn over and over" is in fact
"with respect to the Scripture," i.e. the Bible, as Scalia
implies. It is just as likely, and in this writer's view, more likely, that
the rabbi is referring to turning over and over the "Torah" (sic)
derived from the oral traditions of the Pharisees (Torah SheBeal peh), such
as the Mishnah itself. In which case, whether consciously or unconsciously,
Supreme Court Justice Scalia is stating that the U.S. Constitution does not
have the authority of the Talmud and does not merit the kind of intense
study which the Talmud merits, and this in an anti-Christian context.

Copyright 2009 by Michael Hoffman ·
www.RevisionistHistory.org

Mr. Hoffman's research is funded by http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?cart_

Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
Romans 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
5: For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)

Hasidim
and their Moshiach, that son of Perdition

7: Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)
8: But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;9: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

Not maybe

10: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.11: For the scripture saith,

Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.

12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be
saved.14: How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard?

and how shall they hear without a preacher?

15: And how shall they preach, except they be sent?

not ordained by a state sanctioned 501
C3 institution of Satan's religion, BUT SENT BY THE FATHER

as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
16: But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
17: So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
18: But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.
19: But I say,

Did not Israel know?

First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.
20: But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me.
21: But to Israel he saith,

All day long I have stretched forth my hands

unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

Romans 10:9

9: That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

10: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

11: For
the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.