Making is the Solution to Job Loss from Automation.

Is it:
A. "Manufacturing jobs strangled by government regulation.."
B. Outsourcing of work to other countries where worker pay is
lower...
C. Them damn illegals acome all up in ahere,
astealn my jerb!

WRONG: None of the above.

They were automated away. Workers were replaced with machines because technology
advanced, the corporations invested in it and reaped the rewards. Worker
productivity continues to increase, while worker pay is stagnant because
automation increases productivity and reduces worker demand. The job gains
we have seen are all in the minimum wage jobs (not worth automating) and
high end jobs (too difficult to automate). The jobs in the middle are worth
automating and can be automated. The obvious solution is to shift people
up into jobs that require more education. The blockage is overpriced education
and lazy people more interested assessing blame than in learning. The real
solution may be new age hippie Makers: Dropping out, becoming self sufficient,
and/or embracing automation and letting the robots they build and own do
the work for them.

If you look at a graph with the income a specific job provides arranged from
left to right, with minimum wage on the far left, and CEOs on the right,
and setup the vertical axis to show jobs lost or gained, what you will find
is that while we have actually gained jobs over all, those gains have all
been on the far left (minimum wage jobs, not worth automating) and on the
right (jobs the require creativity, education, deep understanding, etc...
which can not yet be automated). In the center, jobs where humans do hard,
repetitive, mechanical work that does not require great education, are actually
being lost.

It started computers in the early 60s. At that time
computer was a job description, the computers were
humans whose job it was to compute. Youve probably heard of the Unibomber;
Ted Kaczynski, but did you know why he was so pissed off? Two things:
1. He was literally abused in Henry Murrays human experiments at Harvard,
and 2. His life's calling was doing computing tasks in mathematics where
were replaced by the first machine computers. The Unibombers manifesto is
very worth reading, although his methods were ineffective. We will see more
and more like him as jobs are lost, and cruelty continues.

But the real impact was felt with factory jobs in the late 60s and 70s. We
built huge machines that turn out parts, process foods, and produce simple
goods far faster, cheaper, and in most cases, with higher quality (or at
least higher consistency) than humans. It was at this point that we see the
increase in productivity decouple from the increase in wages. Human workers
continued to earn the same amount, while producing more with the help of
machines and automation purchased by the owners and investors of the companies.

Then in the 70s and 80s big ticket, complex, high volume items
like cars, planes, appliances were transitioned into robotic factories. At
that time, we started seeing some of the production which had been outsourced
in the 60s, especially heavy items such as cars, return to the USA,
because increasing shipping costs will always limit outsourcing.

But that return did NOT mean a return to employment of factory workers, because
the new factories were automated it takes far fewer humans to tend, program,
and repair robots than it takes to do that work directly. The new jobs were
either minimum wage (robot tenders) or high end (programmers, repair,
management); no skilled craftsman need apply.

In the 90s the automation trend continued and expanded to include
construction, road work, transportation systems, laboratory work, and many
other areas. In the 2000s we are seeing a transition to the automation
of custom work. CNC, 3D printing, open CAD, etc... took a bite out of custom
fabrication and prototyping shops while at the same time reducing the cost
of prototyping and customized production. Again, more production returned
to the USA, this time because of wage stabilization in China, India, etc...
where workers are now earning only a fraction of what US workers cost, instead
of a small fraction.

Robots are becoming less expensive, easier to setup and program, and so are
replacing more and more small scale jobs on a wider bases. Baxter, and Sawyer
from ReThink Robotics are good examples. http://www.rethinkrobotics.com/
For under $22,000 one of these robots can be acquired by a medium or even
small business and put to work with a simple set of guided movement and button
presses. The operator literally grabs the robots are and moves it to the
first location, presses a button, moves the arm to the next location, and
so on. A simple menu can be used to select actions like center over
this object given a picture for reference, or offset each placement
by this grid arrangement to fill up the empty spaces in a box. More
complex operations are easily built up from basic trained motions; for example,
put X objects into the box, then close the lid and move the box down
the line and get an empty. Job setups are saved and can be recalled
instantly anytime a job needs to be re-run. Think about how much even a minimum
wage worker costs a business owner. Then realize that you only have to buy
Baxter once...

Budweiser just delivered the first big rig full of beer via a totally autonomous
18 wheeler. It drove with a human on board, but he literally crawled in the
back and went to sleep as it rolled down the road. Truck drivers make $50
to 75 thousand. They can only drive 8 hours a day, by law so that $150,000
truck is sitting there doing nothing for the trucking company 2/3rds of the
time. A self driving truck needs only a minimum wage truck tender
to watch over it, load and unload, report breakdowns and do simple repairs
and maintenance. So the trucking industry, with a one time investment of
a few thousand per truck, can reduce labor costs by $35 to $60 thousand per
year, trippel their operational capacity, and probably decrease loss by
increasing safety (self driving cars are stunningly safe compared to humans).
My rough calculations are a savings of $20 to $60 BILLION a year for the
industry as a whole.

Return to a simple life? An interesting experiment, and some do. However,
it is inefficient, and its adoption on anything like a widescale basis would
result in horrible starvation, wars, and loss of life. We need the machines
(and the oil for fertilizer and pesticides) to produce the quantity of food
at the price we can pay to feed our populations. Automation is a wonderful
thing, which benefits all. Sadly, it benefits those who invest in it far
more than those who do not.

Basic Income? This is the idea that, out of the goodness of our hearts,
we who are earning money and paying taxes just decide to give everyone a
small amount to live on with nothing expected in return. Everyone gets it.
Only the people paying taxes pay for it. This is communism, from the economic
point of view. (Please note: This is NOT Socialism) Communism has failed,
repeatedly, in every country where it has been tried. It always devolves
to some form of corruption, where those administering the taxes take larger
and larger cuts until black market economies, theft, and revolution follow.
The countries with functional economies which we call communist
are really authoritarian capitalist countries, which depend on cheap labor
to make goods for sale to other (capitalist) countries and so remain stable.
Anyone who believes the rights of the people can be respected when they are
not necessary to the means of production should watch this brilliant CP Grey
video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs
or read The Dictators Handbook by Bruce Bueno De Mesquita &
Alastair Smith. Trust me, Basic Income aint happening.

Prison? The people who cant, or wont, retrain to become
useful to an automated society and who are not in the few remaining jobs
robots cant do better... lose economic value, and become a drain on
society. At some point, they beg, borrow, and eventually steal to survive.
Our current solution to this problem is to toss those people in jail, or
kill them. This is FAR more likely to be the solution we stick with as the
problem grows. Nearly 1 in 100 people in the USA are in jail. Prison population
is approaching 2.5 MILLION. The interesting data point here is that it costs
about the same to house a prisoner as it does to pay someone a basic income;
on average, $31 thousand a year, vs $28 thousand cost of living. And
that includes a tidy profit for the private prison industry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States

Death? Of course, the ideal solution, from a purely economic
perspective, is simply to kill those who are not productive. For that, we
have wars, street violence, and suicide. To be honest, war doesnt really
kill that many Americans. Young men (and women) are more likely to die in
a car crash at home than in a foreign war. Street violence is serious with
about 16,000 deaths per year. Suicide is the big story; rising 24% in the
last 15 years from under 30,000 in 1999 to nearly 43,000 in 2014. Suicide
by workers in the oldest age bracket (least likely to be able to shift into
the new jobs) has increased 45% to 30 per hundred thousand.https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/health/us-suicide-rate-surges-to-a-30-year-high.html?_r=0

Re-education? The cost of a college degree has spiraled out of control
in the last 15 years, rising 90% from about $3,400/year to more like $10,000
for the lowest cost (public, 2 year) schools. At the same time, the difference
between the highest level schools and the cheapest has more than quadrupled.
The change is less due to increase in the actual cost the school incurs to
provide an education, and more to a decrease in funding from State and Federal
governments.http://www.cnbc.com/2015/06/16/why-college-costs-are-so-high-and-rising.html

So... at the exact moment when we have the greatest need for education to
move people from middle income jobs which are being automated away and into
higher income jobs which are in demand to support that automation, and so
reduce the cost of welfare, prison, or simply killing people, instead we
have reduced the funding for education...

If you think education is expensive, try ignorance

Making what you need for yourself: I have hope that this is the real
solution to the problem. Self sufficiency. If individuals embrace technology
they may be able to use machines to make what they need to fend for themselves
and avoid the need to compete for jobs being taken by machines.

And by technology, I mean everything from 3D printers to Mulch; Robots to
Rainwater Catchment; CNC machines to Chainsaws. One of my favorite youtube
channels is called
"Primitive
Technology" where an unknown man silently demonstrates things like how
to build a home from sticks and mud, make pottery, baskets, forge metal,
etc...

Food: Of course, I dont suggest we leave modern innovations behind.
A 1/5 acer lot in Pasadena, home of the
Dervaes family produces roughly
5,000 pounds of food a year and uses solar panels to run the computers by
which they take orders from local restaurants for edible flowers for fancy
salads. FarmBot.io offers a CNC machine
like gardening robot said to produce enough veggies for one person and pay
for itself in 3 to 5 years use. Closer to home,
Ag Pals provides excellent
design and installation of rainwater harvesting and aquaponic systems for
food production using 1/10th the water and 6 to 10 times the density.
OurSunCooks.com makes cheap but
very effective solar cookers from commonly available materials.

Shelter: Ive had the privilege of working with two different groups
who built 3D printers large enough to print houses. Andrey, at
TotalKustom.com has printed (small)
castles and (large) hotel suites. The guys at
VestaPrinter.comwill sell you a
3D concrete (tiny) house printer. It wont print a mansion, but a structure
large enough to live in is very possible, and you can add on as many rooms
as you wish, just feed cement, water, rebar, etc... These homes are perfectly
legal and meet construction standards because the 3D printed parts are simply
the forms into which rebar is placed and cement poured. Although this has
not yet been done, it would combine perfectly with strawbale construction.
The Tiny Home movement has been featured at past Maker Faires via
CityDesignInc.com

Products: And you cant be replaced by a machine if you are the one
using the machines to make products that other people will purchase. Multiple
small businesses and startups were enabled by their founders learning to
solder, program, cast plastics, and other critical skills at the local Maker
Faires. Many of these people have gone on to make a living selling products.
AryaBall is a local success
story.

The Maker Movement: And so we come to the Maker Movement: Maker Faires, the
STEAM Maker Fest, Maker Places, and all form of interesting open source projects.
These are a way for people to share, largely outside the capitalize monetary
system, their abilities, successes, failures, and lessons on how to
make things yourself.

The typical Maker Faire has more than 200 exhibitors who are not selling
or buying anything; they are not charged for the exhibit space. These people
are proud of what they made, and the Faire gives them a chance to be appreciated
for it. But more than that, they are universally willing to share how they
did it, and show others how they can as well. The cost of hosting the Faire
is paid by sponsors, mostly corporations eager to advertise their products,
and by the ticket price for the attendees. Every Faire includes Hands
On Activities where attendees learn how to make something themselves.
Nearly always included is Soldering where a simple electronic circuit is
constructed and a valuable skill is learned.

The range of methods and results is truly stunning. At the Faire, you will
see everything from Aquaponics to Automatons, Basket weaving to Bio hacking,
Candle making to Computer driven cars... There is a misconception that Maker
Faires are about high tech, and while there is a lot of that, we fully support
ANY making of any kind. If you can teach people to sew, we want you. Canning,
Gardening, Husbandry, Weaving, Pottery, Haberdashery, you name it, if you
make it, we will make room for you.

<A HREF="http://www.sxlist.com/Techref/member/JMN-EFP-786/making_is_the_solution_to_job_loss_from_automation.htm"> Making is the Solution to Job Loss from Automation.</A>

After you find an appropriate page, you are invited to
your
to this massmind site! (posts will be visible only to you before review)
Just type in the box and press the Post button.
(HTML welcomed, but not the <A tag:
Instead, use the link box to link to another page.
A tutorial is availableMembers can
login
to post directly, become page editors, and be credited for their posts.

Link? Put it here:
if you want a response,
please enter your email address:
Attn spammers: All posts are reviewed before being made visible to anyone other than the poster.