Note: I correct the given mistake only once. If you do not use the metric system, I will only make a single comment about it, even if it appears again in the rest of the article. If the draft has many language problems, I will only correct the most glaring ones.

SCP-YEET is a standard sized Waste Management recycle container, with the word's "Are We Eco-Friendly Yet?" written on it with pen remover. There is also a dispenser in the center of it's front, that dispenses "prizes" depending on what

This is unfinished, what comes after 'what'? Anyway, let me rephrase this in proper clinical tone.

''SCP-XXXX is a waste management recycle container without visible branding. On SCP-XXXX front side, ''Are we Eco-Friendly Yet?'' is written with pen remover. Below that, a dispenser is situated that dispenses ''prizes'' depending on the object deposited within it.''

I guessed the last part.

SCP-YEET anomaly occurs when a human is within 10 feet of it.

Since the Foundation is an international organisation, we use the metric system. Use metres, centimetres and kilometres.

This compells them to throw in a piece of trash into SCP-YEET.

So you know, compulsion as an approach isn't particularly interesting on its own anymore, given how many times SCPs with that effect have been written. Take a look at the articles tagged with "compulsion".

Furthermore, the SCP's effect forcing someone to do something tends to be a bit of a lame narrative, since things are more interesting if there's a struggle involved, and/or if the people instead do terrible things of their own volition. Consider reading through the further discussion on the narrative issues of compulsion and addiction effects.

However, this is affected by what the subject determines as 'garbage' or 'awful'. SCP-YEET will dispense a "prize" based on this.

''What the subjects considers 'trash' in the metaphorical way rather than the literal way.''

D-11407 Becomes Enraged and Throws the Book into the trash can.

What's with the random capitalisation?

Subject Name & Details: D-19202, Suffers from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Item used: Several Books Detailing how depression is a "made up Disorder" and those suffering "need to tough it out."

Is there actual literature saying this? That's a little depressing in and of itself.

Notes: Interrogation of the Companies Owners shows they have no knowledge of SCP-YEET or Are we cool yet. They have been Amnesticised and Released

There it is again. Capitalisation is used for the start of sentences, proper nouns and names. Keep that in mind in the future.

You know what? to hell with formality. I'm writing because i'm pissed at you, and the fact you're head of the research on me, SCP-YEET. Yes, I'm Sapient. I'm more sapient than half of the asses you've got working on me! Because unlike you people, I don't make friends based on their favorite football team or their view on politics, but their personality!

Following this, Dr. McCulmick has been placed in temporary holding on The Ethics Community decision. The Ethics Community verdict is pending.

That's unfair and it wouldn't happen, I feel. The EC has no reason to hold this against McCulmick because there was no reason for any of them to believe that this object is sentient. Now if McCulmick did know this beforehand, that would be another story. If that was your plan, you need to give hints that they did beforehand.

Language problems are present throughout the article, both with spelling and clinical tone. Most importantly though, is the idea behind it.

So the idea is interesting, but it stops rather abruptly. I was interested to see the origin or circumstances for the anomaly, but it stops very suddenly and doesn't go anywhere in a narrative sense.

Some aspects people like to add into the SCP to give the reader more to think about include answers to questions like

- Did this object ever have a greater significance before it was contained?
- How was it initially discovered?
- Why does it exist? Does it have a purpose?
- What might the intentions of the creator have been?
- Why does it act the way it does?

Who made it? Was is made at all? If it was, for what reason?

Keep in mind that you don't need to give a full answer for these questions, just enough information to give your reader something to contemplate. Give them enough information to make them care, but not enough to ''spoil'' it, so to speak.

Right now it seems too much based on SCP-914, so you need more context and narrative to set it apart. What's more, there are no real characters to speak of.

Rather than establishing any sort of character or coming up with a narrative device to convey the story that you really want to tell, we get a shoehorned note conveniently found that explains that the reader should be sad or shocked because the author says so. there are no characters; just names of characters, essentially. Nothing has been invested in making the people involved in this story real, and therefore I have nothing invested in the story.

I recommend getting the base idea polished up in the Ideas and Brainstorming forum before you try fixing the draft. Go to that forum, post a quick summary of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone asks), and reviewers there can help you make the idea more interesting and give you some advice on structuring the eventual article for smoothness of reading and narrative.