To share information, provoke thought, network and fun.

Category Archives: Philosophy

The wonderful thing about being in America is having the ability to speak one’s mind. Not only that, there are so many ways an individual can express his/her thoughts these days via social media. Add to these traditional media such as newspapers, magazines and television, we find ourselves surrounded with 24/7 access to thought and opinions on all subjects political, social, religious and so forth.

What I do find particularly frustrating at times is the simplicity and lack of nuance and imagination within many thoughts and opinions. With the tools we have to communicate with one another, there is so much opportunity to discuss, debate, and grow as a society. But what seems to happen on most occasions, is that the simplest, most unsophisticated thoughts are the ones that not only get the headlines, but are also leading the discussions. I plan to follow that thought up with another blog post soon. But for this thought, I will direct my attention to the trending topic of Michael Sam being drafted by the St. Louis Rams.

Personally, I don’t care what people think of Sam in terms of his sexuality. You can be for it or against it. In this world, and certainly in this country, people are going to have an opinion on what they think is right or wrong for whatever reason. As we can see via many comments on Sam kissing his boyfriend on ESPN as he spoke to Rams’ brass, there is no shortage of opinions on either side. I’ll address my thoughts on it shortly.

People who know me understand that I have no sacred cows when it comes to my perspectives. All of us individually and as a group deserve a basic level of respect. And we all deserve our fair share of criticism. I love being black and I love black people. That doesn’t mean I vouch for everything black folks say and do. I am pro equal rights for all, regardless of ethnicity, political, religious preference, sexual orientation and so forth. Still, I don’t blindly endorse what any political party, Christians, Muslims, atheist, the straight or gay community says and do either. Unfortunately, far too many have a ‘you’re for me or against me’ victimization mentality, when they are called on the carpet for inconsistencies or hypocrisies.

With this in mind, on the subject of Sam’s PDA with his male partner, I have a message to all parties who care.

The Religious/White Folk: I’ve already spoken to you about this before. Be anti-gay. Just don’t talk to me about morality and your kids seeing Sam and his boyfriend kissing on TV. Fact of the matter is, Ray Rice knocked his fiancee’ the hell out and I don’t see any of you protesting that. Straight players have publicly cheated on their wives, laid pipe all over the country, objectify women in strip clubs making it rain… and again, you never mentioned that in your pulpits or your social media formats. What trips me out the most though, is that for every preacher, politician and anti-gay public figure, a certain percentage of them are closet drag queens, or somebody on the down low having sex with men. Seriously?

The Religious/Black Folk in General: See message to white folk. But add to this that as you say things like, “I’m tired of this being thrown in my face; when you say, “Yuck!” or “Gross” or “I don’t want my kids to see this on TV…,” remember that Dorothy Dandridge got in a pool at a hotel, and the same white folks who said they don’t have a problem with black people had that pool drained. Traditionally, racist white folks have always had a use for black folks. As slaves, mistresses, servants, entertainers, or even as a ‘friend.’ JUST NOT AS EQUALS. There are layers. I don’t expect everyone to accept me for who I am. But not attacking me is not the same as respecting me and protecting my right to exist as an equal! For a person to say I have gay friends/family, but I wouldn’t teach my kids that it’s OK, is like saying, I don’t have anything against black people, I just don’t want my kids dating them. It’s still bigotry. At least admit that. That doesn’t make you a criminal, it just means there is some potential for growth.

**Most bigotry is in some form or fashion related to sexual fears and myths. That’s another story.**

Look, we all have biases to overcome. The first time I saw Omar Little kiss his partner on The Wire, I was like, “Whoa WAIT! What just happened? It wasn’t a shock because it was sickening. It was shocking because I hadn’t seen it before.

Black people especially should be mindful of our own history with biases against us and the imagery that was important towards our own progression as a people. When I was a kid, I remember my parents gathering us around the television to watch The Flip Wilson show because there wasn’t another show like that for black people. There were hardly NO shows for black people. From ‘Good Times’ to ‘The Jeffersons,’ we were able to receive images on television about our families, our values, often referencing issues that were important to us. Many times in Southern states, they refused to show black people in a light that was integration friendly. They lost their minds when Petula Clark touched Harry Belafonte’s arm in 1968. Can you imagine what it was like when Jim Brown (who was then the personification of black male sexual power and prowess) did a love scene with white sex symbol Rachel Welch in “100 Rifles?” Talk about an OMG moment! This struggle has continued despite many strides. Even when the Cosby show was on, many criticized the show because they felt a black family with a father who was a doctor and a mother who was an attorney was ‘unrealistic.’

Naturally, the gay and lesbian community is going to support images on television that reflect a celebration of their value and right to exist. So seeing Sam kiss his boyfriend at the pinnacle point of his life is a big deal. There is no gay conspiracy to force acceptance upon the straight community. Will and Grace is for them is what Sanford and Son was for us.

Acknowledging this puts me in the cross hairs of many of my straight friends. Even now, on social media when I defend gays, I am often assumed to be gay. They say things like, “I don’t care about what you do with your life.” When I try to show them the parallel between our plights with bigotry, I’m told, “Be gay and do you! Enjoy your lifestyle… but don’t force it down my throat!” Remind me of how many whites were and are called “nigger lovers,’ when they stand up for our rights as a people.

I believe the topics of free thought/free speech is a wonderful thing to discuss. Donald Sterling’s fiasco as well as Michael Sam’s coverage are just the latest opportunity which brings that subject to bear. I just hope that we maximize all these thoughts and speeches to do more than hyperbolize.

You know what came to my mind when I first saw the kiss? I thought, “Look, Michael Sam is just like most other African-American big time athletes. They get to college and go white! No different!

After the state attorney announced that there would be no charges in the Jameis Winston case, I listened to a Miami based sports radio talk show via podcast. The context was ‘IF’ the accuser in the case made up the story regarding sexual assault, would you feel bad or sorry for her? Of the three person set of host, two said they would and one said he wouldn’t. One of the host assessed, (paraphrasing) “I don’t believe at her age she would have really thought this all the way through.” Another host said, “If it’s true that she made it up she has to live with that in front of her family, in front of her father for the rest of her life.” The third host said he wouldn’t feel sorry for her at all. His argument was that there is no excuse for making a false allegation of rape. And that the consequences of what could have happened to the accused far outweigh any ‘reason’ she may have had.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

I am a man with a wife, a mother, two sisters and five daughters. I’ve learned as I’ve gotten older that most of the women I know have experienced some form of sexual assault or abuse. Sexual abuse towards women is horrifically pervasive to the point that men should recognize that the question is not how many women you know who have been sexual assaulted in some form or fashion. It’s how many do you know that haven’t?! This is NOT hyperbole either. The subject matter has hit home for me several times over. I don’t envy women at all. It is a fact that our society, hell our world is stacked full of misogyny. Women are the last and the least recognized of the worldwide historically persecuted and oppressed people. It’s not so easily recognized either as it’s so pervasively normal to attack and witness attacks on women’s value and character. Sexually speaking, men have dominated women for centuries from female genital mutilation which still goes on in many cultures, to rapes on college campuses, in the military, so called ‘date rapes’ within acquaintances, relationships, marriages and so on. Needless to say, us MEN need to re-evaluate and assess ourselves and ask ourselves if we are treating the women in our lives with the proper respect and dignity they deserve. Most of the time the answer is, “Hell no!” Let’s start there!

RESPECT:

Giving women the credit they deserve, I have to acknowledge that they have held down the families, the churches, and have still risen to great places of power in society. In so many ways they have had to learn a develop a cunningness about themselves to advance in what James Brown called, “A Man’s World.” Women have skills and mental expertise that men simply don’t. They know men’s strengths and weaknesses inherently. They can read us like books when they really pay attention. And yet, the sophistication of the female species is one men can rarely grasp. I’ve always said that smart men rule the world, but wise women rule men. (thus ruling the world by default without the hassle) Without them there is a missing element essential to our existence.

TABU:

I think it’s a good thing that mainstream media didn’t go in on the accuser despite the details of the Winston case which revealed she pursued and attached herself to the QB seeking sex. I think this was in deference to the challenges women have had to deal with day to day. I imagine they believe that this case shouldn’t take the focus or deter recognition of the legitimate sexual assault victims. (see statistics)

What should not go unsaid however, is that women are sexual beings. They enjoy sex. They are not just submissives but also dominates. This is a newsflash to many Americans as we tend to view women and women’s bodies from a religiously conservative perspective. Thus the dichotomy of boys sowing oats for sexual explorations while women’s are not afforded the same privilege. I can’t even imagine how hard it is for women to navigate through these messages growing up. Nevertheless, women and their sexuality eventually manifest through the cracks. They get it in even in the most male dominated venues.

So called ‘groupies’ have existed for decades. Just look at any episode of Behind The Music. Women used to throw their panties at Teddy Pendergrass, Marvin Gaye and Tom Jones concerts. There are women who seek the affections of ‘ballers,’ (high school, college and pro.) At FSU they call them, “Cleat Chasers”. (Yes they have a name for it.) Many are very deliberate in the fashion in which they pursue and dare I say attempt to conquer their targets.

Look at someone like Karrine Steffans. She wrote a book on how she sexually conquered dozens of celebrities. She bragged about it. And yet when she was on the Tom Joyner morning show was got offended and hung up the phone when Jay Anthony Brown referred to her as “Super Head.” She gave herself that name and was promoting a second ‘tell all’ sexual conquest book. But she was offended as if Jay was disrespecting her. Are you kidding me? But she is hardly the only one.

As this relates to the Winston case, from the pages in the report, she was not only a willing participant, but initiated and pursued the entire event. Along the way something happened that caused her to make a decision to tell a plethora of false narratives that could have put an innocent man in jail and ruin his reputation. Sexual promiscuity among young people is a side issue worthy of debate. Winston himself said he has some growing up to do. But otherwise, the only thing that happened was a consensual sexual experience between consenting adults. The only victim in this case was a man who was accused of taking something from her that she didn’t generously give.

To go even deeper specifically as it relates to racial matters, most of my adult life I’ve heard older black folk tell their sons before they go to college, “Don’t go messing with them white girls when you get in that school.” Translation: There is no trouble for a young black male like ‘white girl’ trouble. Having an interracial relationship is one thing, but if it turns negative and the authorities get involved, you’re a gonner! Even if you don’t make jail the chances of getting kicked out of school are massive. The black male is the one going to catch hell regardless of what really happened. Or as Ice Cube said, “Smilin’ cuz you out on a date, But sooner or later, the bit#!’ll yell rape. Soon as daddy founds out you a jigaboo, he’ll kill like he did Emmitt Till.” (Don’t shoot the messenger.)

If the state attorney decided to take this case to a grand jury, chances are Winston would have been charged. A grand jury will indict anything including my pet cockatiel. Sure we would have found out about the details a year or so later during trial. If he would have been found innocent, (cause that’s not a sure thing) in the meantime at best, Winston would have been dismissed from the team, possibly from school and his family name tainted for life. His sexual cavalierness is not justification for suffering a lie and being dragged through the legal system.

FINALLY:

This case should be another example of why we need to educate young people on sex, sexuality, education and self respect. Men have used and abused women as sexual objects for centuries. This must stop if we are ever to be about anything seriously. Women need to be able to express their own sexuality freely as validated people without the stereotypes of being called sluts, whores etc.

I as a man am willing to hold sound off in holding other men responsible for the way we have disrespected and abused women over time. Equally so, women should hold women accountable, in calling out those who use sex as a means of weaponry. Women who willingly do the deed, then tell lies to protect their reputation from friends, boyfriends and parents.

It’s not unusual ever day when my wife and I wake up and for one of us to say, “I love you,” first thing in the morning. As a matter of fact, it’s most unusual if neither of us does. However, earlier this week I changed it up a bit. Not because I was trying to. It was just that another phrase came more naturally that morning. I said to her, “I adore you.”

Her response surprised me a bit. When I tell her I love her in the morning, she always smiles and says, “I love you. Normally without any hesitation. If she beats me to the punch, my natural response is usually something like, ‘I love you too baby.” Changing the phrasing provided an interesting response. I can’t remember the exact wording, but it was something akin to, “I’m glad to know that though I often don’t see what you find adorable.”

Her response gave me pause. I felt the pain at what must be a hurtful feeling regarding how she saw herself, (though I can certainly empathize with doubtful feelings of self value.) Not to mention how that affected how she viewed my sentiments towards her.

I asked her to elaborate. And she went on to give me the reasons that she didn’t see herself as adorable. I used this opportunity to share the details of what I felt within when I expressed those words.

I said something like:

“You are adorable because you are. And adoring you has nothing to do with only appreciating everything that is so called right or good about you. Our lives are a journey. Each of us has virtues, gifts, talents, and yes even baggage and faults. Navigating through baggage and faults are a part of our journey. I have never expected you to be perfect. But I do love you in your weaknesses while recognizing your strengths and celebrate your growth in a number of areas. When I say, ‘I love you’, or that ‘I adore you’, that means I love and adore all of you. Not just that which has been refined. Think of it this way: We love and adore our daughters, and yet we can quickly name several areas where growth and development is needed. Love and adoration doesn’t wait for perfection. Instead, they team to nurture, protect and make better what has already been created perfect; A child of God, more valuable than anything the world has ever or will ever see.”

I didn’t say these words to her as if I were to teach her something. I was also talking to myself. Oh how great a thing it is, to adore, and be adored, just the way we are.

Question for Spouses and Lovers; If your lovin’ was named after a restaurant, what would it be?

I didn’t ask my wife this question. But rather I recently asked what’s her favorite restaurant. Her answer was Citizen Kanes Steakhouse, a nice little spot in the St. Louis County municipal town named Kirkwood. I took her there for our one and only visit during our most recent anniversary.

Citizens came highly recommended by someone whose name escapes me. But he or she had enough credibility to make break out in ‘big shot’ mode and make dinner reservations for what was sure to be a wonderful, but pricy experience.

I was correct about all of the above. The experience was awesome. Sitting at a cozy little table in the corner upstairs, we enjoyed wine, appetizers and a steak that we both agreed was the best either of us ever had. The service was nothing short of outstanding either. We left the restaurant feeling extremely satisfied and thoroughly impressed. We promised ourselves that we would visit again at some other special occasion.

Citizen Kanes

Part of what makes a restaurant experience unique, is the combination of meeting a primal need (eating for survival) and the extras that tap into another sensual desire which is to experience pleasure. Eating touches four of the five senses. i.e., sight, smell, touch, taste. (You can get the fifth sense of hearing if the food is sizzling when you receive it.)

I liken the primal needs and pleasures of food to love and marriage. Each partner embodies the restaurant service provider, as well as the one seeking to satisfy a hunger within. To sustain health, we each need a steady diet. Being fed once a month, week, or any random day is not going to make for a healthy and sustainable life. However, food isn’t the only essential for creating an enjoyable dining experience. There is also the atmosphere, the lighting, the décor. A restaurant can have the best food, but if the atmosphere is not appealing to the eyes and nose, or if the host is not professional and inviting, even if the customer endures long enough to try to meal, the negative presentation can taint the entire experience.

The finest dining establishments entail minutia towards the slightest of details. This includes the ingredients as well as the preparations. The temperature and time in which to prepare certain items. There isn’t just the main course, but the wine and the appetizers. In order to succeed in providing Five Star service, I have to be on top of all the little details that make my abode a welcoming paradise. Relationship food isn’t just functionally natural, it’s also emotional and spiritual. It’s wrapped in a blanket of security and protection, fun and sensations. I am the owner, the greeter, the server, the chef, and the general manager. My #1 goal is to satisfy my customer so much that she never desires to eat at any other establishment. I must be versatile and nuanced enough in becoming all things that I may please one.

Perhaps you think this is all kind of over the top. That it doesn’t take ‘all of that.’ Here is something to consider. Your lover is your customer. And your customer is going to be hungry. You may think your customer should always just show up at your doorstep. But don’t sleep on this; There are many restaurants to choose from. All of them with signs advertising what it is they have to offer your lover. Some restaurants cater to the cheap date. They deliver fast food in just a few moments. You can get drive-thru service; go to the window, make a request over the loudspeaker, (phone, email, IM) and ‘wham bam’ receive services without even getting out of the car. Some go above that, perhaps he/she would have opportunity to sit down a while and enjoy a meal. The experience may not be so good that they want to go everyday, but perhaps there is something on the menu they enjoy. Other businesses go the the very top of the food chain. (Pun intended) And get this, none of these restaurants care about where your lover dined previously. They will welcome his/her business now! It doesn’t always take that much effort either. Hell, nowadays one can even get a meal at a gas station!

And so it is with your lover. My goal is to represent the best of what my wife desires, (the most flavorful steak ever with all of the extras) while being able to quickly convert to something she just wants to snack on. Even she doesn’t want to eat steak every day. In my eyes, when it comes to taste and service, the customer is always right. As the service provider who wants her repeat and exclusive business, I must adapt according to what she desires on the menu at any given moment. I am her personal chef. And I have to be open for business at all times.

The purpose behind the goal, is that as she goes about her business and she sees the lights of golden arches, spots the brightness of the castle; as she passes by that spot that sits outback, she won’t consider stopping in because she’s already full and satisfied.

So I ask you, what is your loving like? I want my lovin to be like….Citizen Kanes~

I do not plan on speaking much on this election. I hope to say what I have to now and not much after this. Truth is, regardless of who won we have great challenges in our nation and we have a lot of work to do. No need to recite all the details regarding the economy, jobs, education, the military and so forth.

Still, I don’t mind acknowledging that this election was different than any other I have been involved in. The first time Barack Obama was elected it was special. It was unbelievable to me. I never thought I would see a person of color in the White House. And for those thinking that’s all I’m about, you would be wrong. In other words, I could have voted for a Colin Powell presidency, while Clarence Thomas’ supreme court appointment and Herman Cain’s candidacy can go kick rocks! Most people who look like me can joyfully celebrate accomplishments by people of color from a historical perspective of where we’ve come from, but we are not hung up on color for the sake of color sake. As the old folks used to say, “Everyone who’s my skin folk, ain’t necessarily my kin folk.” I voted for The President the first time because I believed in his vision and what he stood for. His skin color was a caveat, not even close to a deciding factor.

That being said it wasn’t hard at all to recognize and understand all of the racist vitriol surrounding the White House since Obama was elected four years ago. From the beginning as surprised as I was that he was elected, for racist Caucasians, they were equally enraged. Rush Limbaugh exclaimed, “I hope he fails!” Joe Wilson went ballistic with his “You lie!” blast in a display of disrespect to the office never seen before. Mitch McConnell let it be known that his #1 priority was making The President a one termer.

John Boehner stood opposite whatever President Obama stood for, even if Obama changed to Boehner’s position.

The First Lady couldn’t even promote fighting childhood obesity without being attacked.

Jan Brewer put her finger in the face of The President as if she was ready to scrap!

I could go on. But let me get to my points. I’m exhausted. The President, myself and a whole lot of black folks, progressives etc. have taken a lot of shit over the last four years. We have heard it all. Now it’s our turn. Others can say what they need to, but I will speak for myself! In my Cee Lo Green voice, I present “F#@! YOU” notices to the following:

Mitch McConnell:F#@! YOU, 4 More Years! Try working for the American people and not against the black guy for a change!

John Boehner:F#@! YOU, 4 More Years! Focus more on helping our nation and less on your tan!

Rush Limbaugh:F#@! YOU, 4 More Years! Looks like YOU failed! Send your Mexican nanny to the pharmacist for more drugs you fat assed blubbering dope fiend!

Tavis Smiley and Cornel West:F#@! YOU, 4 More Years! Yep I said it. You have toured the nation perpetrating the fraud about a “Black Agenda” while you never asked Bush, Clinton or any other president to do the same. My president cares for all people… including black people. It was insulting and ignorant that you tried to lay ever problem within the African-American community as his feet and expect him to focus on those and those alone. You both are frauds!

Fox News:F#@! YOU, 4 More Years! Hey look at it this way, your ratings will remain steady with the racist who will tune in and hear you whine, lie and avoid the real issue which is that White male domination is blowing away with the wind. Another generation and a half, and you may only have 7 viewers listeners using a CB radio!

Sara Palin:F#@! YOU, 4 More Years! How’s that for “shuckin’ and jiving?”

Business Owners who threatened their employees: That what foul what you did trying to intimidate your workers. Quite desperate too! None of Obama’s policies hurt your businesses especially. You get every tax break in the world! If you fail, its more likely because of your shotty business decisions. F#@! YOU, 4 More Years!

People who said Colin Powell voted for Obama because he was black: Yea, how many of you voted for McCain and Romney because they were white? Yea that’s what I thought…. F#@! YOU, 4 More Years!

Republicans, those who tried to disenfranchise minority voters: Them days are over! We aren’t allowing you to get away with that any longer! Get a clue! You lost in every court, including the Supreme Court! And the only people who were caught attempting to commit voter fraud were REPUBLICANS! F#@! YOU, 4 More Years!

Franklin and Billy Graham: (And all the other radical white and black evangelicals) You actually sold out your Christianity for racism. I guess you can put Mormonism back on the cult list now! F#@! YOU, 4 More Years!

Go to church but they tease us, with a picture of a blue-eyed Jesus! – Ice Cube

Well, sort of. I don’t take these lyrics from Ice Cube’s rant from his classical African-American community critique “Us” as an issue of merely color; but rather ideology.

I tried to make this point in the last church I belonged to. Our services were tailored in a fashion that allowed us to ask questions or make comments during the sermon. As you can imagine, that made for some memorable experiences, both for the good and not so good. At the time George W. Bush was campaigning for a second term in the White House. There was a heavy religious fervor regarding that election too. Both Catholic and Protestant organizations were galvanized similarly (if not more) than they were in 2000.

My comment during the service was that I found the election season offered at least two different Jesuses. Immediately when I said it there were cat calls from the other members. “Oh no, there is only ONE Jesus.” I think they thought I was being literal. And I found it hard to explain, as I was cut off continuously. My point was that while most Christian churches share the same basic bible for scripture references, Jesus’ points of emphasis and agenda seemed to go down racial, class, social and political divides.

I recall visiting a prominent church in South St. Louis when the subject of the election came up. The pastor of the church said, “I’m not going to tell you who to vote for. But I will say that I’m not voting for someone who is for killing babies.”

I thought to myself, “Wow, I can understand Jesus being bent about abortion, but he’s not bent about torture or bombings of civilian communities? What about all of the other injustices and crimes against humanity out there perpetrated by men for political or ideological reasons? Is that ultimately what this election is about?” I’ll get back to that.

Later I attended a different church for a men’s breakfast. As usual when the subject of men come up at such an event it’s natural for the meaning of manhood and how it’s manifested in society to be brought up. Some of the speakers made a point of making sure that homosexuality and manhood had nothing in common. In doing so words and phrases to describe gays or being gay were slung around. They consisted of standards such as ‘sweet’ ‘sissies’ and ‘punks’ to name a few. Then there was the usual reference to Adam and Steve.

While all of these black macho evangelical males “amen’d” and approved of this name calling, I raised my hand and asked a question:

(Paraphrasing)

“I hear all of this name and cat calling regarding the homosexual community. And while I respect the fact that your brand of faith entitles you the right to have your own opinion that homosexuality is a sin, do you honestly believe that Jesus would endorse the name calling that some of you are using such as ‘sissy,’ ‘punk’ or even ‘fags?’ “

At that point the pastor was silent. To speak boldly like this against the precepts of leadership in a powerful black church is not something grinned upon. But one of the elders jumped in quickly to the rescue. With anger he burst from his seat and started spouting off scriptures in Leviticus and how homosexuality was a sin and that God didn’t like it and neither should any Christian. He was practically foaming at the mouth from the front of the sanctuary as he looked towards my way in the back.

I reiterated:

“I’m not discussing the validity or non validation of homosexuality as a sin. What I am asking… is that if there were homosexuals in this congregation, (and chances are there one or more among this group of men) if I were a homosexual who was struggling with my sexual identity vs. what I believe my faith allows, would your words as well as your spiritual disposition attract me to you as a source of help, or would I be repulsed, insulted or put off by your tone? Would Jesus address a person who happens to be a homosexual with the names you choose along with your mocking tone?”

DEAD SILENCE in the congregation. I think some thought a fight was about to ensue.

The elder grew more angry, then shouted something else before the pastor got up and addressed my question… sort of.

“I understand what you are saying brother. And perhaps you are right that we can do better with the name calling. But let me be clear, homosexuality is a sin. Now let’s move on.”

This, among other things at that time, drew me to the conclusion that as far as the evangelical community was concerned, all God/Jesus really cared about were what I called the ‘Big 3’ Abortion, Homosexuality, and Stem Cell Research- all of which He was against.

That’s right. Let it be known henceforth that these are the bullet points on Jesus’ hit list. But was it really?

The question of Jesus and the identification of his agenda have been going on thousands of years, right? In the scriptures he seemed to identify it himself:

Matthew 16:13-15

13 Now when Jesus came into the parts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Who do men say that the Son of man is?

14 And they said, Some say John the Baptist; some, Elijah; and others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets.

15 He saith unto them, But who say ye that I am?

16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

In my estimation, this question is still the most divisive among Christian believers. Who Jesus is- a direct result of what he endorses- stands for, evangelizes, and lives by. As Christians (followers or Disciples of Christ) by very definition that agenda should translate into their own. And this is where confusion and division has obviously settled in.

Let’s take it step by step. While these are not absolute, I think we can agree that these are generally the focus, missions, and nature of Jesus, depending on the demographics and world view of the worshipper.

During slavery a certain segment of the population believed that Jesus endorsed the enslavement of Africans which included selling, beating, raping and murdering people that Jesus/God created. During this same period the slaves (often taught Christianity either from Catholics in Africa or Protestant enslaver in America) believed that Jesus would deliver them from their oppression.

Similarly, during the Jim Crow and civil rights eras, The KKK (who defined themselves a Christian organization) believed as they do today that Jesus choose them to be superior, while other nationalities are inferior. Many churches, both black and white, believed that Jesus created, loves and values all men equally.

These days we face many of the same challenges. Some upwardly mobile church dogma believe that Jesus favors the wealthy while others believe Jesus is concerned for the poor.

Let me give you a biblical example and how it may play out today:

John 6:5-14

5When Jesus then lifted up his eyes, and saw a great company come unto him, he saith unto Philip, Whence shall we buy bread, that these may eat?

6And this he said to prove him: for he himself knew what he would do.

7Philip answered him, Two hundred pennyworth of bread is not sufficient for them, that every one of them may take a little.

8One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, saith unto him,

9There is a lad here, which hath five barley loaves, and two small fishes: but what are they among so many?

10And Jesus said, Make the men sit down. Now there was much grass in the place. So the men sat down, in number about five thousand.

11And Jesus took the loaves; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down; and likewise of the fishes as much as they would.

12When they were filled, he said unto his disciples, Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost.

13Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves, which remained over and above unto them that had eaten.

14Then those men, when they had seen the miracle that Jesus did, said, This is of a truth that prophet that should come into the world.

Newt Gingrich

If something like this were to happen, one side of the Christian agenda would report it this way:

Boy donates food, Jesus takes the little and performs a miracle to serve thousands. The people rejoice.

Another Christian agenda would report it this way:

Unemployed multitude threaten to mug little righteous boy who has food. Jesus the self-appointed welfare socialist takes the food away from the one who had in order to spread the wealth. Claims of a miracle go unsubstantiated, but Newt Gingrich says that Jesus should face prosecution for robbery. Sara Palin said Jesus is an illegal alien- “just look at his name”- (Pronounced Hey-Seuss) and bad for American values. Finally, Rush Limbaugh called him “The Magic Hebrew.”

Ok (chuckle) I’m having a little fun with this. But you get my point. This conversation has political ramifications, but in this context it’s not political at all.

I have attended many of these churches during my lifetime so I speak with experience.

The evidence shows that our depiction of Jesus, given his world view, is something either given to us by others or something we decide upon ourselves- based on our own background- sociopolitical, socioeconomic and dogmatic vantage point. Christians decide which Jesus to follow based on what they are comfortable with. That’s right. Believe it or not, Christians have pretty much picked their own Jesus to worship and follow based on their own accepted set of criteria.

For those living in inner cities, their Jesus cares about the poor; thought not exclusively. For many living in upper class neighborhoods, Jesus wants you to have riches. Many ministers I know believe and teach directly that the level that God shows his favor and blessings upon you, and the very proof of your own level of faith is a direct result of the believer’s financial status.

﻿﻿﻿﻿﻿ Rev Ike

﻿﻿Some Christians promote charity and believe that government should help with social causes. Other Christians are for cutting any and everything having to do with helping those less fortunate. It’s happening in this country in a big way right now. I’m not making a judgment one way or the other but more asking why is it that so-called liberal Christians believe one thing while conservative Christians believe something else entirely – while reading the same bible?

I’ve heard it said that it’s up to moderate Muslims to speak out against radical Muslims who are for violent and other unrighteous acts done in their name. While I agree with that I rarely see Christians doing the same.

When have you heard of moderate Christians speaking out against Pastor Steve Anderson and Rev. Wiley Drake for praying that President Obama dies? Have you ever been up late and night and seen those ministry programs where they offer to sell you God’s blessing for $500-$1000?

So why not just join a church that chooses a Jesus I am comfortable with?

On the one hand, that sounds kind of attractive, right? But on the other, I’m not so sure about that. My own personal evangelical bent lends me to believe that God, by virture of being the creator of the universe (which includes my very existence), has the authority to demand without question first and foremost that he be in charge. If that is the case I certainly don’t need to align myself with a church that simply makes me comfortable. Furthermore, I can’t fathom believing in a gospel that is not transferable to any and all communities in the world. I can’t believe a message in College Park, Georgia that could not be preached in the slums of Calcutta, India just because the economic opportunities are not the same.

The bottom line in my view is that Jesus (as we know him) has been bastardized and transformed into a political football, tossed to and fro by whoever wields his name. He’s been labeled like soup, and packaged for consumption like a Happy Meal or an Ipad too often for the purposes of manipulation, domination, or deceit. That’s not to say all churches, ministers, or parishioners, liberal or conservative, are all bad or good. But what is the difference in that or any other religious group that have segments that do good work? The point for me is that following God as I want to know him is so profoundly vital to my own spiritual growth and well-being, dogmatic preferences and spiritual limitations cancel my mere desire to belong in such a group.

Suicide: Let’s talk about it. I know someone who recently had a suicide in their family. As the family started to put the pieces together, they learned that the young man had elaborately planned his demise. This in spite of the fact that his secret was revealed prior to the day of decision and help was offered.

So I have a few questions as it relates to this:

Is suicide ever a viable option for the hopeless? What would you say to someone who told you he/she was contemplating suicide? Would you try to convince them not to go through it? If so what would you say? Would you use bible scriptures or call the authorities?

Have you ever thought about or considered suicide? I am not ashamed to admit that I’ve been there. I have strongly considered it before and planned it as well. I consider it a miracle that I am here today.

Have you ever thought about it or planned it? Will you share?

From what I see, the stories of these kids who have killed themselves because of bullying have been sensationalized. But several folks young and old end their lives daily and we hear nothing of it.

Suicide is real and it’s here in a serious way. So let’s talk about it!