Further to Vaccine
Shenanigans, here is more data to show how the vaccines have more to
do with business than with health. It is really worth visiting
Jon Rappaport's website where
he shows how the statistics (among lot of other less known vaccine info)
are being manipulated to con the unsuspecting. Strangely, even when the
manufacturer states that there is no evidence for efficacy - the propaganda
is such that most, especially the mainstream health practitioners, summarily
ignore it and continue to trumpet the supposed benefits...

Similarly, a
Lipitor TV ad clearly states: "Lipitor has not been shown to prevent
heart disease or heart attacks". Just read some of the comments on
the statin posts and you will be amazed at how many feel trapped in the
cholesterol hoopla and are reluctant to not take it (and similar statins).

OCTOBER 12, 2004. Reporter Jon Eisen, at Scoop Media, runs
down another Chiron tale. He has the audacity to actually read the Chiron
package insert that goes along with the vaccine. Surely he is breaking some
law. It's not fair to examine company literature too closely.

I confess I visited the Chiron website. And I found this
reassuring statement: "Every second, 25 people across more than 70
countries are immunized with a Chiron vaccine."

Also, beneath a very long list of Chiron vaccines, I encountered
a remark that was puzzling. The FDA has not approved any of the vaccines.
They are not sold in the US. Call me crazy, but I'd think Chiron would want
to peddle these shots in the richest nation in the world.

Vaccine Maker Admits NZ Meningococcal Vaccine May Not Work,
and Could Be Dangerous

The manufacturer of the new meningococcal vaccine currently
being introduced into New Zealand has admitted that ”complete protection
against infection caused by the New Zealand strain (of the bacteria) cannot
be guaranteed.”

In the “package insert” designed to provide guidelines
for doctors and nurses administering the vaccine, the CHIRON company also
states that the vaccine has a high rate of possible side effects.

Moreover, it says that much crucial data about the performance
of the vaccine, as well as data on “contraindications” (where
it should not be used) are incomplete.

Specifically:

• While the insert says that “the population
at risk should be vaccinated with MeNZB [company name for the vaccine] to
prevent serious systemic disease” it concedes that “data on
concomitant use of other vaccines are not yet available.” This means
that if a person gets one or more other vaccines at or around the same time
as the MeNZB vaccine, there are no data on possible adverse outcomes.

• The vaccine also “has not been evaluated in
persons with thrombocytopenia (low blood platelet count) or bleeding disorders.”

• ”As with all injectable vaccines, appropriate
medical treatment and supervision should always be readily available in
the rare case of an anaphylactic event (life threatening allergic reaction)
following administration of a vaccine.”
The company neglects to provide any data on these kinds of events.

• “MeNZB has not been specifically evaluated
in the immunocompromised. Individuals with complement deficiencies and individuals
with functional or anatomical asplenia (problems with or absence of a spleen)
may mount an immune response to MeNZB; however, the degree of protection
that would be afforded is unknown.” [Understand that far more than
a BILLION people in this world have compromised immune systems---JR]

• “Any acute infection and febrile illness (an
illness with an associated fever) is reason for delaying the use of MeNZB
except when, in the opinion of the physician,withholding the vaccine entails
a greater risk.” In other words, inasmuch as the manufacturer does
not actually have any meaningful data on risks and benefits, it’s
up to the doctor’s “educated guess” as to whether or not
to vaccinate a sick child or infant. More: “A minor illness such a
temperature of less than 38.5 detgrees such as a minor upper respiratory
infection, is not usually reason to postpone immunisation.” However,
in that such an infection may or may not be an indication of someone who
is “immunocompromised” (a contraindication for the vaccine;
remember that there is “no data” on this) the reader is left
wondering about this apparent contradiction in the directions.

• “There are no adequate data from the use of
MeNZB in pregnant women.”

• “Information on the safety of the vaccine during
lactation is not available.”

• “The degree and quality of the cellular immune
response is not yet established.”

• “Clinical efficacy (whether it works or not):
No prospective efficacy trials have been performed with MeNZB.” In
other words, the company has no idea as to whether or not the vaccine actually
does what they say it should do.

All information posted on this web site is
the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only.
It is not to be construed as medical advice. Only a licensed medical doctor
can legally offer medical advice in the United States. Consult the healer
of your choice for medical care and advice.