Blog dedicated to Freedom of Speech and all human beings who are willing to stand up for innocent people caught in this system and against corrupt political entities and opportunistic frauds. Some celebrity gossip also.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Steven Machat Is Clear - He Doesn't Want To Receive Any More Emails Re. Leonard Cohen, His Theft, Etc. - I Have Been Clear About This As Well

Of course, I'll respect
your wishes. I also do not want to receive these emails and I most
certainly don't want to be criminally harassed over Cohen's theft from
you and your father. That's your business and I have given you the
evidence. I've advised Gianelli relentlessly to cease and desist and my
sister had her lawyer advise him the same.

I
have no idea why Gianelli is writing you. I heard form Steven Machat
this morning and advised him that I do not want to be involved in his
game with Cohen and Gianelli. Cohen has stolen from Steven Machat and
Steven is well aware of that. I am uninterested in being criminally
harassed over that issue.

Gianelli has relentlessly targeted me and members of my
family, and others, since 2009. Steven Machat absolutely advised me to
sue Cohen for theft. He wrote a book about Cohen's theft, etc. He and
his father managed Cohen and worked as his lawyers. Steven is well
aware that Cohen accuses people of ripping him off to breach contracts.
He absolutely offered to testify at my alleged trial where the
prosecutor targeted me over a letter that is evidence that Cohen stole
from Machat & Machat.

In any event, I am busy today and just wanted to note that Gianelli
is now writing you. My former roommate filed a complaint with the
police department over this type of harassment meant to intimidate
people and turn them against me. The USPS advised me that they have
opened a criminal investigation into Gianelli. He's a stark raving
lunatic with motive.

Cease
and desist, Gianelli. Steven Machat is clear that Cohen stole from him
and his father; falsely accuses people of ripping him off to breach
contracts; uses corporations to evade taxes; has green card and
residence/US tax problems; etc. He advised me to sue Cohen for theft.
He offered to testify at my trial. I was targeted at that trial over
Cohen's theft from Machat & Machat. I haven't seen Ray Lawrence
since February. I know this - my sister's lawyer spoke to you and
advised you to cease and desist. If Ray Lawrence wants to communicate
with you, he's free to do so. I have no idea why he would want to be in
contact with someone that targets innocent people over Leonard Cohen,
Phil Spector, etc. Your obsession with me is appalling. I heard from
Steven Machat this morning and advised him that i do not want to be part
of his game with you and Cohen. I most certainly do not want to be
criminally harassed over Cohen's theft from Machat & Machat. Steven
has the evidence that Cohen stole from him and his father. He's an
attorney and an accountant. We have spoken recently.

My roommate, Eric Salter, who you targeted had his lawyer
advise you to cease and desist and we filed a complaint with Ft.
Lauderdale Police Department over your criminal harassment of both of
us. My ex-husband wrote me that he had no idea what you were talking
about. I know this - you lied about him also. He's a friend of mine
and we most definitely went sailing together.

Leonard Cohen's a thief and that does not give you a
right to criminally harass me - including with respect to Cohen's theft
from Machat & Machat.

Read the transcript of Steven Machat & my conversation. He confirmed that this is an accurate transcript.

Leonard
was desperate to get rid of this two managers, Judy Berger and Mary
Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records
early on in his career. Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women
were ripping him off. He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get
rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off. You could
say it became repeat behaviour. My father duly got rid of Berger and
Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed
to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger. The idea of the
company was twofold: one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly
created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just
like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.

I’ve
no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have
passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between
Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements. This
was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material
possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business
managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose
sole aim was to minimise tax liability.

Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.

Cohen
controlled his copyright, not my father. The irony was that Cohen had
total control over my father … Do you know what happened to the
$400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office? Bearer bonds are
just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal
ownership and, with it, tax liabilities. Cristini told me (who knows if
this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours
after he had died but the next day they disappeared.

Cohen
denied any knowledge of these bonds. I was unsure if they existed or
were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.

Cohen
said: “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour? Flemming extorted $100,000
from me. He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his
promoter’s fees. He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted
me to pay him.”

Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.

The
next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The
Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks
this family. Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands
with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time. Cohen was extremely
uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he
couldn’t get away quick enough. Neither could my son, because he took
one look at DeMornay and ran. He was terrified because he thought she
was the nanny in the film!

It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.

Leonard
told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was
left managing his business interests. He said: “She started believing
this money was hers and she started spending it. All of it. When
I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the
account to cover the draft. I was speechless. I didn’t know where to
look, where to turn or what to think.”

Then
Leonard told me that Kelley had bought a multi-million dollar house in
Mandeville Canyon with his money … Leonard said: We didn’t even get the
house back. Kelley stopped paying the mortgage so the house got
repossessed and the mortgage company took everything in the house as
well.

Lynch
had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends,
journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and
one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.

The whole scheme was so ridiculous [Leonard Cohen’s attempts to limit his liabilities on the deals] from the start. All Leonard had to do to avoid U.S. taxes was tear up his green card, and stop living in and using the U.S. as his base.

It’s
no secret that Leonard has also made a killing on the art market by
selling his paintings, plus his touring of the last two years … If
that’s true, it doesn’t really tally with the clear implication from
Cohen that he is a man who has been robbed of everything.

Leonard told me before I left that he had actually offered Kelley a settlement …

It’s
clear that Cohen and his lawyers want to heap the blame on Kelley’s
shoulders for more than just revenge. Because Cohen’s pension assets
were cashed in … ahead of schedule they are liable to tax so they need
to establish that this situation is her fault. The penalties could
actually be greater than the tax itself.

Even
after Steven Machat has denounced you as the "pathological liar" you
are and said quite clearly that he has "nothing to do with you" you
persist in sending him email after email in furtherance of your charade.
And the more emails you send the more you confirm Machat's - and
everyone else's - view of you: Liar, drunk, crazy, thief, and out of
control - not necessarily in that order. Are you the same Kelley Lynch
who wrote just last night that Steven Machat wants to have sex with
Leonard Cohen - just to be the malicious psycho you clearly are? You
give new meaning to the word "lunatic".

What a freaking psycho.

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

Cohen stole from
Machat & Machat and I do not want to be criminally harassed over
that matter. Steven Machat is an attorney and accountant and well aware
that Cohen stole from him. He advised me to sue Cohen and Kory and
views them both as evil. They are.

Why
should I be criminally harassed - by Gianelli - because Cohen stole
from you and your father? The man has been aligned with Cohen since
2009. He's also obsessed with Phil Spector. Great. He can review
Cohen's three different versions of the Phil Spector gun story before LA
Superior Court. The judge accepted my Writ. I've addressed Cohen's
theft and concealed evidence, perjury, etc.

What's Gianelli's point? We're both clear that Cohen stole
from you and your father. He also stole from me and you advised me to
sue him for theft.

I have told the truth about
everything. Gianelli's the bald-faced liar with motive who thinks your
little game with him gives him the right to criminally harass me and
others. Rutger has lost his fingers, Steven. Cohen took the stand and
LIED about that incident. You know my younger son's father. He owes me
money and was meeting with Cohen and Kory. What were they initially
accusing me of? Having sex with Oliver Stone. I can assure you that
Oliver Stone will never testify to that deranged lie.

In any event, for the record, I do not want to be criminally
harassed over Cohen's theft from you and your father. I provided you
with the evidence and found the letter (after Cohen and I parted ways)
that your father wrote to Carter/Irving Trust transmitting $30,000 from
Machat & Machat for your ownership interest in that entity and your
15% interest in the IIP. My lunatic prosecutor then targeted me over
that issue. Why? Cohen stole from you and the prosecutor concealed the
transcript of our conversation from my jurors. The woman is a liar.
Did Cohen's theft from you also annoy him, Steven? How about his theft
from Phil Spector? You were clear - he sold Phillip's masters.

In any event, I am reviewing evidence with my attorney who
sees right through Cohen and understands that my trial was an IRS matter
that demands an investigation. He put that in writing and I forwarded
that email to the IRS and FBI.

I have an email from you this morning so I'm not having a
conversation with myself. I am asking you to leave me out of your game
with Cohen and Gianelli. I do not want to be criminally harassed
because Cohen stole from you. He planned to blame your father for his
tax problems and that's why he abandoned his green card after your
father's death. Years later he told me that Canada Revenue asks where
you pay your taxes and the iRS does not. So he had to re-obtain a green
card approximately two years later. That is deranged. I have a letter
re. his numerous social security numbers.

In any event, I do not want to be harassed over
Cohen's theft from Machat & Machat. We are both clear that he stole
from you. He stole form me also.
Kelley

I
think Steven Machat['s views on Cohen are highly relevant. Steven
Machat is free to play games with Gianelli but Gianelli has no right to
criminally harass me over Cohen's theft from Machat & Machat. And
yes, Steven is correct - Cohen falsely accuses people of ripping him off
to breach contracts. He does indeed use corporations to evade taxes.

Kelley

Gods, Gangsters & Honour by Steven Machat

Excerpts:

Leonard
was desperate to get rid of this two managers, Judy Berger and Mary
Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records
early on in his career. Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women
were ripping him off. He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get
rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off. You could
say it became repeat behaviour. My father duly got rid of Berger and
Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed
to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger. The idea of the
company was twofold: one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly
created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just
like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.

I’ve
no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have
passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between
Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements. This
was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material
possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business
managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose
sole aim was to minimise tax liability.

Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.

Cohen
controlled his copyright, not my father. The irony was that Cohen had
total control over my father … Do you know what happened to the
$400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office? Bearer bonds are
just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal
ownership and, with it, tax liabilities. Cristini told me (who knows if
this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours
after he had died but the next day they disappeared.

Cohen
denied any knowledge of these bonds. I was unsure if they existed or
were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.

Cohen
said: “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour? Flemming extorted $100,000
from me. He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his
promoter’s fees. He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted
me to pay him.”

Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.

The
next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The
Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks
this family. Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands
with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time. Cohen was extremely
uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he
couldn’t get away quick enough. Neither could my son, because he took
one look at DeMornay and ran. He was terrified because he thought she
was the nanny in the film!

It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.

Leonard
told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was
left managing his business interests. He said: “She started believing
this money was hers and she started spending it. All of it. When
I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the
account to cover the draft. I was speechless. I didn’t know where to
look, where to turn or what to think.”

Then
Leonard told me that Kelley had bought a multi-million dollar house in
Mandeville Canyon with his money … Leonard said: We didn’t even get the
house back. Kelley stopped paying the mortgage so the house got
repossessed and the mortgage company took everything in the house as
well.

Lynch
had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends,
journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and
one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.

The whole scheme was so ridiculous [Leonard Cohen’s attempts to limit his liabilities on the deals] from the start. All Leonard had to do to avoid U.S. taxes was tear up his green card, and stop living in and using the U.S. as his base.

It’s
no secret that Leonard has also made a killing on the art market by
selling his paintings, plus his touring of the last two years … If
that’s true, it doesn’t really tally with the clear implication from
Cohen that he is a man who has been robbed of everything.

Leonard told me before I left that he had actually offered Kelley a settlement …

It’s
clear that Cohen and his lawyers want to heap the blame on Kelley’s
shoulders for more than just revenge. Because Cohen’s pension assets
were cashed in … ahead of schedule they are liable to tax so they need
to establish that this situation is her fault. The penalties could
actually be greater than the tax itself.

Gianelli is now criminally
harassing me over you. It doesn't matter that you know Cohen's a thief
who stole from you and your father; uses corporations to evade taxes;
falsely accuses people of ripping him off to breach contracts; has green
card and residence/tax problems; and is a fraud who uses religion to
con people?

I haven't lied about anything and your little game with Gianelli is
now being used to criminally harass me and others. I have advised you
to leave me out of it.

You have the evidence re. Cohen
and he has concealed evidence from the court. The default judgment is
clearly illegal. The proof of service re. his complaint is evidence of
extrinsic fraud.

Does Cohen plan to put you on the stand? Well, you're clear -
he's a THIEF. So am I. And I think the information you have that he
stole Phil Spector's masters is appalling.
Kelley

Gianelli apparently can't read your words
below. You have been clear - Cohen's a thief who falsely accuses
people. He is criminally harassing me, members of my family, and
others. The man is deranged and obvious has motive. Good luck with
Gianelli. He's a sleazebag.

Kelley

Gods, Gangsters & Honour by Steven Machat

Excerpts:

Leonard
was desperate to get rid of this two managers, Judy Berger and Mary
Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records
early on in his career. Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women
were ripping him off. He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get
rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off. You could
say it became repeat behaviour. My father duly got rid of Berger and
Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed
to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger. The idea of the
company was twofold: one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly
created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just
like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.

I’ve
no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have
passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between
Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements. This
was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material
possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business
managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose
sole aim was to minimise tax liability.

Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.

Cohen
controlled his copyright, not my father. The irony was that Cohen had
total control over my father … Do you know what happened to the
$400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office? Bearer bonds are
just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal
ownership and, with it, tax liabilities. Cristini told me (who knows if
this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours
after he had died but the next day they disappeared.

Cohen
denied any knowledge of these bonds. I was unsure if they existed or
were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.

Cohen
said: “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour? Flemming extorted $100,000
from me. He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his
promoter’s fees. He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted
me to pay him.”

Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.

The
next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The
Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks
this family. Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands
with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time. Cohen was extremely
uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he
couldn’t get away quick enough. Neither could my son, because he took
one look at DeMornay and ran. He was terrified because he thought she
was the nanny in the film!

It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.

Leonard
told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was
left managing his business interests. He said: “She started believing
this money was hers and she started spending it. All of it. When
I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the
account to cover the draft. I was speechless. I didn’t know where to
look, where to turn or what to think.”

Then
Leonard told me that Kelley had bought a multi-million dollar house in
Mandeville Canyon with his money … Leonard said: We didn’t even get the
house back. Kelley stopped paying the mortgage so the house got
repossessed and the mortgage company took everything in the house as
well.

Lynch
had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends,
journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and
one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.

The whole scheme was so ridiculous [Leonard Cohen’s attempts to limit his liabilities on the deals] from the start. All Leonard had to do to avoid U.S. taxes was tear up his green card, and stop living in and using the U.S. as his base.

It’s
no secret that Leonard has also made a killing on the art market by
selling his paintings, plus his touring of the last two years … If
that’s true, it doesn’t really tally with the clear implication from
Cohen that he is a man who has been robbed of everything.

Leonard told me before I left that he had actually offered Kelley a settlement …

It’s
clear that Cohen and his lawyers want to heap the blame on Kelley’s
shoulders for more than just revenge. Because Cohen’s pension assets
were cashed in … ahead of schedule they are liable to tax so they need
to establish that this situation is her fault. The penalties could
actually be greater than the tax itself.

Steven
wrote the words below. He knows - Cohen's a thief. He also emailed me
that Cohen and Kory are evil. That's putting it mildly. Steven was
clear in his book - he has no idea if there were bearer bonds. I have
never been accused of anything having to do with bearer bonds. Cohen's
the one that unraveled Loyens & Volkmaars. That's where he funneled
his royalties while a US resident. He abandoned his green card after
Marty Machat's death and planned to blame Marty Machat. Steven Machat
is clear - Cohen uses corporations to evade paying taxes.

Gianelli is truly out on a limb here. I've advised Steven to leave
me out of his little game. He is the one who spoke to my public
defender, offered to fly in and testify for me, and had a scheduling
conflict. Steven Machat is the individual who told me to sue Cohen for
theft and asked me to send him the evidence. I have done that.

Cease
and desist. Here's Machat speaking (in his book) about Cohen's theft
from him and his father. Steven Machat has written in his book that he
doesn't even know if there were bearer bonds, lunatic. We know this -
Cohen unraveled off-shore accounts at Loyens & Volkmaars after Marty
Machat's death. Machat has accused Cohen of being a thief. Read his
words, liar. I have asked Steven to play his game directly with you and
Cohen and leave me out of it.

Cease and desist.

Kelley

Gods, Gangsters & Honour by Steven Machat

Excerpts:

Leonard
was desperate to get rid of this two managers, Judy Berger and Mary
Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records
early on in his career. Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women
were ripping him off. He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get
rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off. You could
say it became repeat behaviour. My father duly got rid of Berger and
Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed
to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger. The idea of the
company was twofold: one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly
created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just
like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.

I’ve
no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have
passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between
Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements. This
was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material
possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business
managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose
sole aim was to minimise tax liability.

Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.

Cohen
controlled his copyright, not my father. The irony was that Cohen had
total control over my father … Do you know what happened to the
$400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office? Bearer bonds are
just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal
ownership and, with it, tax liabilities. Cristini told me (who knows if
this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours
after he had died but the next day they disappeared.

Cohen
denied any knowledge of these bonds. I was unsure if they existed or
were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.

Cohen
said: “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour? Flemming extorted $100,000
from me. He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his
promoter’s fees. He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted
me to pay him.”

Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.

The
next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The
Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks
this family. Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands
with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time. Cohen was extremely
uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he
couldn’t get away quick enough. Neither could my son, because he took
one look at DeMornay and ran. He was terrified because he thought she
was the nanny in the film!

It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.

Leonard
told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was
left managing his business interests. He said: “She started believing
this money was hers and she started spending it. All of it. When
I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the
account to cover the draft. I was speechless. I didn’t know where to
look, where to turn or what to think.”

Then
Leonard told me that Kelley had bought a multi-million dollar house in
Mandeville Canyon with his money … Leonard said: We didn’t even get the
house back. Kelley stopped paying the mortgage so the house got
repossessed and the mortgage company took everything in the house as
well.

Lynch
had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends,
journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and
one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.

The whole scheme was so ridiculous [Leonard Cohen’s attempts to limit his liabilities on the deals] from the start. All Leonard had to do to avoid U.S. taxes was tear up his green card, and stop living in and using the U.S. as his base.

It’s
no secret that Leonard has also made a killing on the art market by
selling his paintings, plus his touring of the last two years … If
that’s true, it doesn’t really tally with the clear implication from
Cohen that he is a man who has been robbed of everything.

Leonard told me before I left that he had actually offered Kelley a settlement …

It’s
clear that Cohen and his lawyers want to heap the blame on Kelley’s
shoulders for more than just revenge. Because Cohen’s pension assets
were cashed in … ahead of schedule they are liable to tax so they need
to establish that this situation is her fault. The penalties could
actually be greater than the tax itself.

Machat can speak for himself. He has never called
Cohen a "thief". But you miss the point as usual. The issue is not his
opinion of Leonard Cohen it is his opinion of YOU (Kelley is a "mistake
hired by my father...at best a pathological liar...I have nothing to do
with her and have no intention of changing that equation..".

This reality is in contrast to you PRETENDING to be in conversation
with Machat for the last two years through last week, with Steven
allegedly supporting your every word.

Your family members would
not even be known to me but for your charming habit of copying a cast of
hundreds (me included) with their names, relationships and contact
information. The same goes for Ray Lawrence who you dragged into this as
well.

What a blatant and malicious liar you are

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

CEASE
AND DESIST GIANELLI. Remove my family members from your harassing
emails. Machat knows that Cohen's a thief. Here are excerpts from his
book. He knows he lies about his advisers and accuses them of ripping
him off in order to breach contracts. Cohen closed the off-shore
account, Loyens & Volkmaars, that i believe the bearer bonds may
have been attached to and I have given the IRS evidence of that.
Machat's clear about Cohen's green card issues as well. He's also clear
about this - Cohen uses corporations to evade taxes and uses religion
to con people.

Do not contact my family members again. You have been formally
advised to cease and desist. Your obsession with me remains astounding.

Gods, Gangsters & Honour by Steven Machat

Excerpts:

Leonard
was desperate to get rid of this two managers, Judy Berger and Mary
Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records
early on in his career. Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women
were ripping him off. He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get
rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off. You could
say it became repeat behaviour. My father duly got rid of Berger and
Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed
to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger. The idea of the
company was twofold: one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly
created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just
like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.

I’ve
no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have
passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between
Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements. This
was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material
possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business
managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose
sole aim was to minimise tax liability.

Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.

Cohen
controlled his copyright, not my father. The irony was that Cohen had
total control over my father … Do you know what happened to the
$400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office? Bearer bonds are
just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal
ownership and, with it, tax liabilities. Cristini told me (who knows if
this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours
after he had died but the next day they disappeared.

Cohen
denied any knowledge of these bonds. I was unsure if they existed or
were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.

Cohen
said: “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour? Flemming extorted $100,000
from me. He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his
promoter’s fees. He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted
me to pay him.”

Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.

The
next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The
Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks
this family. Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands
with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time. Cohen was extremely
uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he
couldn’t get away quick enough. Neither could my son, because he took
one look at DeMornay and ran. He was terrified because he thought she
was the nanny in the film!

It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.

Leonard
told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was
left managing his business interests. He said: “She started believing
this money was hers and she started spending it. All of it. When
I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the
account to cover the draft. I was speechless. I didn’t know where to
look, where to turn or what to think.”

Then
Leonard told me that Kelley had bought a multi-million dollar house in
Mandeville Canyon with his money … Leonard said: We didn’t even get the
house back. Kelley stopped paying the mortgage so the house got
repossessed and the mortgage company took everything in the house as
well.

Lynch
had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends,
journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and
one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.

Now, this covers just about everyone you have held out as agreeing
with you - Cutler, Pavelic, Rutger, Ray, your public defenders,
Francisco, Karen, Steven - to a man/woman they have all disavowed and
cut you off. NONE of them agree with your malicious and warped view of
the world - and they all agree you are a liar and/or are mentally ill.

Now, go away and leave me in peace. I am retired and don't wish to be bothered by you anymore.

STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

Well,
it's clear - he came onboard about Phil Spector when Doron Weinberg
took on Phillip's case. I attempted to turn Phillip against Leonard
Cohen? That's laugh out loud time.

Gianelli has my son and sister copied in on his psychotic rant. He
has - again - been advised to cease and desist. The man is in Greece
and obsessed with me. I wonder whose paying him?

In any
event, I hope Steven Machat learns how to spell my name and Gianelli
learns how to spell Machat. That's about all I've picked up on in this
latest slanderous outrage. This man also wrote my former roommate.

I
am advising you to cease and desist. Your obsession with me is
astounding. Did I attempt to turn Phil Spector against Leonard Cohen?
How laughable. Read Machat's book. Cohen stole from him. My sister's
lawyer advised you to cease and desist. Why is my son, Rutger, copied
in on your email? Oh right - you have engaged in criminal witness
tampering. Steven Machat has nothing to do with me and Cohen. Cohen
stole from Machat & Machat. That's simply factual.

Still obsessed with me in Crete? How's Alan Jackson? Machat''s not
involved but I was questioned - by the lunatic prosecutor Streeter -
over his father and his company so that's a bit bizarre since Cohen
stole their share of IP.

I am advising you to stop writing my sister and son. Share your delusions with Machat and back away from my family.

Dear All:I
believe this forwarded email settles the matter of who is telling the
truth about what and also whether Steven Marchat supports Kelley Lynch's
warped view of the world.I hope I can now get back to my retirement.STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.-----Original Message-----From: smachat@gmail.comDate: Sun, 19 May 2013 21:26:52 To: <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Reply-To: smachat@gmail.comSubject: Re: Kelley Lynch's documented theftStephen, please call me Steven. Kelly Lynch is a best a pathological liar. She was a mistake that my Dad hired when we needed a secretary or two. That is back in 1984. Whatever Cohen did or did not do, Kelly was part of it. Cohen and I have a karma as we all do because of
the duality nature of living and moving. Your positive is for sure
someone's negative. Your light can be my darkness. I believe in truth. And truth is a subjective as well as objective understanding. I have nothing to do with Kelly and have no intention of changing that equation. I thank you for your breakdown. Please if you need feel free to contact me. But be assured I am not getting involved. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry-----Original Message-----From: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 19:35:19 To: <smachat@gmail.com>Reply-To: stephengianelli@gmail.comSubject: Kelley Lynch's documented theftMr. Machant,I am a retired lawyer now living on Crete.In my former life I maintained a law blog from November of 2007 until the first part of 2013.In December of 2009 I learned that a colleague of mine - also
from San Francisco - had been retained by Phil Spector to defend him on
retrial and tried to find daily press coverage.Unfortunately, the only daily retrial coverage was by an extremely biased (against the defense) blogger.I
therefore began to blog the case in earnest, trying to give more
evenhanded insights into the proceedings which were entirely favorable
to Spector's side of the case.So much so that I received letters of thanks from
Phil Spector's trial lawyer Weinberg, one of Spector's sons, and a die
hard fan of Spector's - who attended every day of both trials.Kelley Lynch found my blog in May of 2009 while I was spending a month in my house on Crete.She
tried to hijack the blog's discussions of Phil Spector case in a lame
and transparent attempt to turn Phil Spector against Leonard Cohen (who I
barely recalled from my HS days as an artist whose album I purchased
for a couple tracks) by floating the preposterous theory that Cohen's
retelling of a 35 year old gun incident led directly to Spector's
indictment and subsequent conviction of murder.Preposterous because Cohen never testified before
Spector's grand jury - let alone at EITHER murder trial and could not
have contributed to Spector's legal woes on any level.At the same time Kelley Lynch lamely attempted to persuade the
world that she had sacrificed "everything" for her "dear friend" Phil
Spector because the LAPD, the Los Angeles DA, Cohen, Bergman, Kory,
Rice, Lindsay and many others conspired to "ruin Kelley's life" because
she holds the keys to proving that Cohen is guilty of "tax fraud", and
prosecutors were and are desperate to preserve Cohen's credibility as a
witness against Spector. (So much so, she claims, that prosecutors
fabricated her 2012 prosecution for criminal harassment and restraining
order violations.)So Lynch began posting hundreds of crazy and
hateful comments on my blog calling Cohen everything from a thief to a
child molester and making similar unproven allegations about many other
people too.Ultimately, I had to ban her from my blog.Kelley
Lynch then began sending me up to 40 emails a day - copy to the IRS,
the FBI, my colleagues, the State Bar, the press, politicians, and
scores of others. I have received approximately 15,000 such emails to
date. Accusing me of everything from child molestation to obstruction
of justice and witness tampering and also conspiring with Jackson,
Cohen, Kory, Rice and others.Lynch also began republishing this slander on her
first (of many) blog - dedicated to her goal of "joining forces with
Phil Spector" (presumably with Spectors lawyers and cash) to sue all of
Kelley Lynch's enimies, including Cohen.I was advised to simply ignore Lynch, but that did no good.I
therefore learned as much as I could about her various legal
contentions and lawsuits - downloading evidence and transcripts and
sending a runner to copy court files.As for Cohen I could care less whether he is a good guy or a bad guy - he is just an artist I vaguely recall from HS.Lynch is another matter entirely and I know of my own knowledge that she lies about her own affairs. And about others.I have personally reviewed the evidence in support of Cohen's embezzlement judgment against her.Lynch
has quoted you as claiming that Cohen has a pattern of falsely accusing
his managers of stealing from him. I do not know whether this is true
or not.What I do know is that Kelley Lynch deposited
royalty checks made payable "to the order of Leonard Cohen" into her
PERSONAL checking account and transferred funds from the bank accounts
for the Cohen family trust and Leonard Cohen's personal account into
Kelley Lynch's own accounts and that these transfers and deposits exceed
the percentage that Lynch Cohen verbally agreed to by $7.9M.I am about to link a declaration. It is signed by
Kevin Prins, a partner of a well regarded forensic accounting firm and
was prepared by Scott Edelman - a lawyer of national reputation who is a
partner in one of the three most reputable law firms in the US (Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher).It attaches 98 pages of bank documents to prove Lynch's theft.Unless
one assumes that these highly reputable professionals are "liars" and
"frauds" AND painstakingly forged the front and back copies of the
canceled checks and other documents appended to the Kevin Prins
declaration, then Kelley Lynch is indeed a thief. Balanced against this overwhelming evidence is simply Lynch"s word.But
this is the woman who has also claimed that the Colorado restraining
order was a "fraud" and that she was "never served" when in fact the
court transcript shows that Lynch appeared at the hearing and asked the
court to simply issue a restraining order against her rather than
continue with the hearing.And I know for a fact that she has serially lied about me.See the Prins Declaration, and exhibits here:http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/29620593/html5I would therefore be extremely cautious about
relying on this woman's word - no matter what issues you may personally
have with Cohen.STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.

--

In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.