Argument Quizzes Online & Trivia

Ever wondered how much you know about argument? Take these awesomeargument quizzes online to gain knowledge and flaunt it across the web. Tackle multiple choice questions, true or false questions, or yes or no questions, and more to discover amazing facts about yourself and the world. Play these argument quizzes as a party game or just have binge session for yourself.

With challenging questions to test your intelligence and questions that will have you in splits, we bet you will be glued to these argument quizzes for hours. These amazing argument quizzes are perfect for kids, teens, and inquisitive adults too!

Build your knowledge with argument quizzes created for a variety of topics. You name it and we have it all. What's more, you can create new quizzes on topics of your choice and share them to see who knows better.

Argument and Persuasion are two English words, and at times, their meaning can be confusing as to whether they are the same or not. The argument is a simple word which means a kind of discussion in which two or more people engage themselves in a debate and whereby all the arguers are expressing themselves from different viewpoints.
For example, you and your friend(s) can be giving opposing views about a particular talk of discussion. When you are arguing, you are supporting your claims with facts and statements that are necessary to convince your opponent.
Persuasion, on the other hand, is an act of persuading or convincing someone towards accepting your point of view about a particular talk of discussion. While, the argument might end without anybody accepting another person's view about something, through Persuasion, someone can easily be convinced by his opponent to accept his/her opinions about something.

What is the difference between Argument and Persuasion?

Argument and Persuasion are two English words, and at times, their meaning can be confusing as to whether they are the same or not. The argument is a simple word which means a kind of discussion in which two or more people engage themselves in a debate and whereby all the arguers are expressing themselves from different viewpoints.
For example, you and your friend(s) can be giving opposing views about a particular talk of discussion. When you are arguing, you are supporting your claims with facts and statements that are necessary to convince your opponent.
Persuasion, on the other hand, is an act of persuading or convincing someone towards accepting your point of view about a particular talk of discussion. While, the argument might end without anybody accepting another person's view about something, through Persuasion, someone can easily be convinced by his opponent to accept his/her opinions about something.

Is the following argument written in "standard form"?
"Peanut butter is healthier for you than ordinary butter. It's got peanuts, for one thing, and peanuts have protein and nutrients...

No, it s not written in standard form.No. For this to be written in standard form all the premises would have to be clearly identified, set on separate lines, and the conclusion written at the bottom. In this case, the conclusion is actually the first sentence -- Peanut butter is healthier for you than ordinary butter.

Is the following argument written in "standard form"?
"Peanut butter is healthier for you than ordinary butter. It's got peanuts, for one thing, and peanuts have protein and nutrients...

No, it s not written in standard form.No. For this to be written in standard form all the premises would have to be clearly identified, set on separate lines, and the conclusion written at the bottom. In this case, the conclusion is actually the first sentence -- Peanut butter is healthier for you than ordinary butter.

Sorry kid, you have to be over 4 feet tall to ride the Tumbler, and youre not quite 4 feet tall.

Answer:
1. If you can ride the Tumbler, then youre over 4 feet tall.
2. Youre not over 4 feet tall.
Therefore, you cant ride the Tumbler.
This is valid, modus ponens.
Note: You have to be X in order to Y means that X is a necessary condition for Y, its not a sufficient condition. So the translation is If Y then X, not If X then Y.

Sorry kid, you have to be over 4 feet tall to ride the Tumbler, and youre not quite 4 feet tall.

Answer:
1. If you can ride the Tumbler, then youre over 4 feet tall.
2. Youre not over 4 feet tall.
Therefore, you cant ride the Tumbler.
This is valid, modus ponens.
Note: You have to be X in order to Y means that X is a necessary condition for Y, its not a sufficient condition. So the translation is If Y then X, not If X then Y.

If I study hard then I’ll pass the final exam.
2. I passed the final exam.
Therefore, I studied hard.

1. WeakWeak. The premises dont say that the ONLY way to pass the final is to study hard. They only say that IF I study hard then Im sure to pass. But I could still pass without studying hard (because the questions were easy, because I cheated, because Im really smart, and so on...).

If I study hard then I’ll pass the final exam.
2. I passed the final exam.
Therefore, I studied hard.

1. WeakWeak. The premises dont say that the ONLY way to pass the final is to study hard. They only say that IF I study hard then Im sure to pass. But I could still pass without studying hard (because the questions were easy, because I cheated, because Im really smart, and so on...).

If an argument form is valid, like the one below …
1. All A are B
2. x is an A
Therefore, x is a B
… then all arguments that share this form are also valid.

1. TrueTrue. This is a fundamental property of valid argument forms, that theyre FORMS. Validity is a property of the structural features of an argument, its independent of the specific claims that are being asserted.

If an argument form is valid, like the one below …
1. All A are B
2. x is an A
Therefore, x is a B
… then all arguments that share this form are also valid.

1. TrueTrue. This is a fundamental property of valid argument forms, that theyre FORMS. Validity is a property of the structural features of an argument, its independent of the specific claims that are being asserted.

In ordinary language we often rely on implicit background assumptions when both presenting and interpreting arguments.

TrueTrue. Once again, this is why it can be helpful to write an argument in standard form, so that we can make explicit what these background assumptions are and what role theyre playing in the argument.

In ordinary language we often rely on implicit background assumptions when both presenting and interpreting arguments.

TrueTrue. Once again, this is why it can be helpful to write an argument in standard form, so that we can make explicit what these background assumptions are and what role theyre playing in the argument.

In logic, the term “argument” always implies some kind of emotional confrontation.

FalseFalse. In logic an argument is a technical term, it doesnt presume any sort of conflict or emotional confrontation. In the real world, of course, people can react emotionally when theyre presented with a challenging argument, or when their own arguments are challenged. But thats a different matter.

In logic, the term “argument” always implies some kind of emotional confrontation.

FalseFalse. In logic an argument is a technical term, it doesnt presume any sort of conflict or emotional confrontation. In the real world, of course, people can react emotionally when theyre presented with a challenging argument, or when their own arguments are challenged. But thats a different matter.

Argument is part of the English curriculum where we try to understand how to go about an argument. This comes in handy to professions such as law. This in particular tests your knowledge on the parts of an argument.

Questions: 10 | Attempts: 73

Sample Question

Which is the conclusion in the following argument:Death penalty should be illegal. Murder is always wrong

Read each statement, and then select A. if the statement is An Argument or B. if the statement is Not An Argument. An Argument is defined as a controversial statement, frequently called a claim, supported by evidence and a...

Questions: 12 | Attempts: 71

Sample Question

People should ride bicycles more, because air pollution is really a problem in the city.