Cheers to “Conspiracy Theorists” and “Stuff”.

Since the appalling murder on some 3.000 human beings from over 50 countries on September the 11th 2001 the words “Conspiracy Theory” and “Conspiracy Theorists” have been used as denigrating adjective for everybody who has any doubts whether governments, police, intelligence agencies or military are telling the population the truth.They don´t lie, do they ?

Sure enough, it´s accepted to stay within the status quo and say that those people often “Spin” things. Like when Olly North promised the truth and nothing but the truth and then stops short of telling it for reasons of national security. After all, soap-operas like Spin City have trained the citizen to consider corruption, crime in office and lies as “sexy”.

It´s an entirely different ball-game if somebody wants to deconstruct the status quo. For those outcasts the spin-doctors have designed effective labeling, positioning and scapegoating strategies, laughing at many who in fact may have a quite more valid “conspiracy theory” than, lets say, an outrageous one. Like the one that 19 Arab Hijackers, armed with box cutters defeated one of the most sophisticated air-defense systems, several times during the same day, managed to bring down three steel reinforced World Trade Center High Rise Buildings with two aluminum tin cans, or that Kennedy was killed by a magick bullet. No, not magic, magick. The devil is in the detail.

The words conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorist have suffered the same abuse as the word “stuff” has suffered in science. Have you ever thought about what “stuff” means ?

It´s a perfectly legitimate word. It´s something that is mentioned or understood, or present, but it is not named. In materialistic sciences it´s often used derogatively. All that stuff, like all that pseudo science or worse than that, all that annoying stuff that we can´t explain.

And yet, funny enough, todays science declares that the things within the known universe, which are explainable within strictly materialistic terms and sciences, only account for and explain seven or ten percent of all that is out there while the remaining 90% are some “Stuff” like dark matter, subtle or sexy energy and what not.

Let´s say that “many conspiracy theorists” are made to suffer the same fate by politicians, police, intelligence services and armed forces, as the word “stuff” suffers from the scientific community. Everybody knows it´s out there. Everybody knows it´s true. It´s almost undeniable, and everybody hates it.

Now, we also know that negative emotions have a negative impact on actually solving problems. So, why not have some fun with all that conspiracy stuff rather than letting ourselves be spun into feeling bad about being denigrated, positioned, scapegoated. I´d say let´s have fun while throwing all that “Stuff” at those who try to keep it out of the media, outside of the literature, outside of science and history. If we have some fun and are able not to take ourselves too seriously, in other words, if we don´t let our emotions be dictated by those who wish to frustrate us, it may be that we are that much more effective.

Because a little bit of funny stuff is healthy, I´ll try to be the first one to deliver some really outrageous “conspiracy stuff” for you, and please don´t take me seriously.

Mohammad Atta and NATO´s Flying Circus. How NATO could celebrate a cool victory and ship all evidence from the crime scene. Hiding a crime in plain sight.

Remember that I insisted on using the word Magick ? Now lets´s construct a Magickal Square from the word NATO and OTAN. What do we see if we exclusively read the two middle letters at each side of the square, reading from left to right ? Right.! We get the word ATTA, two times.

Remember the name of the supposed “lead hijacker on September the 11th ? Right Mohammed ATTA. Have there been two Atta´s ? Ok that´s really too outrageous, but let´s say he worked for NATO and was a “double agent”? More likely. After all, he is not only known for having frequented strip joints. He is also known for having frequented and having been trained on US Military bases. Only that, the media are writing pretty little about.

If that was not enough to make you laugh try this one.

Open you editing program. Go to Wingdings 2 in your editing program, and write ATTA. You will see a hand, two crossed squares and a hand. Is somebody “covering up” something?

Then go to Wingdings and write ATTA. Now you will get a hand with a victory sign, two snow crystals and one more hand with a victory sign. Is NATO telling us that 9/11 was a COOL VICTORY ? That´s laughable! I admit it. But don´t forget that the purpose of this exercise is to have some fun. If for no other reason than for the fact that there are some who really hate this STUFF.

Try to use Webdings and type ATTA. Now you get two cranes which are beside steel structure like grids and two ships. Right, the ships had to be pre chartered to transport all that steel that quickly away from the crime scene. When was the lease for the ships signed?

The entire thing REALLY gets funny if you use Webdings and write NATO. What you get is an eye, a crane with a steel grid like thing, a ship, and an ear. In other words. We are telling you precisely who committed the crime and how we got away with it. You just have to listen and to look. We hide the crime right out in the open. It´s in your face and we are laughing at you. I´m sure the planners of false flag operations have their twisted fun, so why shouldn’t we have a little bit of fun too?

I don´t know how you feel after reading this, but I had fun writing it, and that´s what it all is about. Stop letting ourselves being impressed by those who want us to feel uncomfortable about the fact that we know that there is a lot more than “spin” going on in Spin City.

Besides that, it´s not you and me who murder thousands to get away with waging an illegal war. I say cheers to conspiracy theorists, I proudly admit that I am one that I belong to the “bunch on the grassy knoll”.

It makes me feel much more comfortable with myself than I would be if it was me who has shot Kennedy or had to cover the murder on him up. Anytime. In the final equation, many of us conspiracy buffs are more scientific than those colleagues within the materialistic sciences who are annoyed over the fact that the strictly materialistic paradigm only can account for some 10 % of the known universe, and who try cover over the 90 % STUFF which threaten their paradigm. It can´t be really fun when one, rather than being exited about all that stuff and to embark on some “real science” gets annoyed about all those 90% stuff out there. The truth is out there as much as the stuff that makes up ninety percent of the universe. Believe it or not, but it can be fun to be discovering it.

Christof Lehmann – nsnbc editor

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

About christoflehmann

Christof Lehmann is the founder and senior editor of nsnbc. Christof Lehmann is a political writer, psychologist, and independent political consultant on a wide range of issues, including conflict and conflict resolution, negotiations, security management, crisis management. His articles are published widely in international print and online media and he is a frequent contributor to radio and TV programs. He is a lifelong advocate for human rights, peace and international justice and the prosecution of war crimes - also those committed by privileged nation. In September 2011 Christof Lehmann started the blog nsnbc in response to what he perceived as an embargo on truth about the conflict in Libya and Syria. In 2013, he plans to transform nsnbc into an independent, daily, international online newspaper.

Subscribe

Archives

nsnbc RSS Feeds

Legal Disclaimer

nsnbc, its owner and editors are exempt from responsibility for any of the content on nsnbc. Legal responsibility for any nsnbc content, under anly law and any jurisdiction remains exclusively with the originator of the content. nsnbc is an independent media, encouraging an open and free discourse. nsnbc, its owner or editorial staff do not necessarily agree with or endorse the content of the published material, and are not to be held accountable for it under any circumstance.