Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

This is what I wrote on 29 January:""...believable that Adam could have named the dinosaurs, just as the Bible indicates". Except there is absolutely nothing in Genesis 1 that could be taken as alluding to the very largest - massive - dinosaurs. "... the extinction of the wooly mammoth as an accepted and settled reality in our history was exactly the same as the extinction of the dinosaurs ...". Hardly. One happened before humans were around, the other during (earlier) human history. Besides the whole reality of species extinction is totally alien to anything in the Bible (including the flood account in Genesis which merely records a large die-off of land-based life). So your newly acquired unscientific religious beliefs aren't even biblical".

Further comment submitted to Nathan Buck under his post dated 27 January:

"Your WW's colleague Charlie Wolcott has just told me in comments under his WW's post dated 23 February:"As long as you aren't hurling insults and mocking, you won't be censored. I know not about the comment on Nathan Buck's posts which were censored. I saw other comments to his post, but not from you. I will ask him about it, but I really can't say. I'm glad you have learned how to be more careful in how you cite your sources."

Yet you censored me for writing:""...believable that Adam could have named the dinosaurs, just as the Bible indicates". Except there is absolutely nothing in Genesis 1 that could be taken as alluding to the very largest - massive - dinosaurs. "... the extinction of the wooly mammoth as an accepted and settled reality in our history was exactly the same as the extinction of the dinosaurs ...". Hardly. One happened before humans were around, the other during (earlier) human history. Besides the whole reality of species extinction is totally alien to anything in the Bible (including the flood account in Genesis which merely records a large die-off of land-based life). So your newly acquired unscientific religious beliefs aren't even biblical".

I was not hurling insults and any 'mockery' was deserved mockery.

Wolcott also claims to have seen other people's comments under your post. But - under your post of 27 January - I have seen none at all."