Atheism – Religion – Irony

It must have been many months since my last blog post. I normally update each week but earlier in the year I found myself bored with hashing out the same old pieces. I began to notice that every week when I sat down to write a piece, I would have 2 or 3 very small religious articles from the news – and one massive Islamic attack. Naturally, I chose to speak on the most important event. This, sadly, ended with a barrage of blogs that all seem to be plagued with the one religion. Which was not my intention when starting the blog. Writing about Islam is like dragging a piano upstairs, whilst 1000 men pull the piano backwards at the same time.

Last night I debated a Palestinian woman* on twitter (* The account had a fake image, which I found by reverse searching the image – so based on the misogynistic views of said account holder, I have to believe it was in fact a man.

This person not only lied about their beliefs, but unashamedly explained how having sex slaves is OK, how rape victims aren’t actually raped if they’re married to their attacker; how women and men are not equal (even though her bio claims she is a freedom fighter for equality- seriously)

Most importantly in my opinion, and something I find all too familiar, is that she claimed many things did not exist in the Quran, only to be corrected by myself. To her credit, she kind of acknowledged I was right. Crucifixion, sex slaves & decapitation are 3 things she denied were inside her holy book. All 3 of course are – and I supplied evidence of this. She accepted this, although most theists seem to have a reset button whereas tomorrow when she debates someone else – she will have consciously ignored all that she learned the night before. This is most notable in twats like Ray Comfort or Banana man as he is known. On Monday he is told how evolution works, and on Tuesday morning he is back on a radio station using the same old lines that were defeated & explained mere hours before.

The inverse of current views on Islam is actually the truth. The idea that only a minority are “extremists” is nonsense. If we define “extreme” as those who blow themselves up, sure – if we define it as those who think being gay should be punishable by law, or those who will become apologists for chopping off hands, heads & feet or child marriage – which I do – then it is actually a majority. In 2009 for example 0% of British Muslims polled agreed that being gay was “morally acceptable”. For those confused by this, it means 100%, the highest majority polled believed being gay was “morally unacceptable”.

Muslim conservatism, anti-gay hatred, anti-Jew hatred & even anti-women hatred (much more veiled) pardon the pun, is rife in the majority of Muslim communities. Sure, they won’t chop off a child’s head, but they will genuinely sit down & discuss why the Quran says they can in certain situations…

Them – “You see, in times of war, the prophet permitted crucifixion & decapitation.”

ME – “So Alan Henning, the aid worker who had his head chopped off by ISIS for being an infidel, that was okay?”

Them – “No”

Me – “But are ISIS, in their opinion at war with the West?

Them – “Well, yes.”
Me – “And Alan Henning was not a Muslim, so he was what is known as an infidel, correct?”

Them – “Well, yes.”

Me – “So you agree Muslims can decapitate and crucify humans they’re at war with, which they did to Alan Henning. You believe this is okay.”

THEM – “BLOCK”

These folks on twitter and the like are not extremists, most of these accounts have bios that claim to be “feminists” like the one last night who argued men are worth more than women & that she is okay getting 50% inheritance – or that it’s okay that she needs 4 witnesses for each man if she is raped because as she explained – How are you even going to have 4 witnesses. Whatever that means.

This tiresome effort of showcasing the real fundamentals of Islam & how those who believe it will act accordingly – is clearly getting me down. It looks to be going nowhere. And the more Muslims rape and murder at a rate scientifically proven as higher than any other religious group – the more western liberals, like myself, cower into submission & claim that even though we only ever hear of Muslim atrocities, that it must be a fault of the media, it must be a trick somehow. The plain evidence in front of us cannot be the simple explanation. I urge us all to think of Occam and his trusty razor.

I said to myself “I’m taking a night off.” at the start of this year, as I thought what is the point in explaining the link between Jihad & the Quran again and again after each week’s terror attack.

That night off spanned months, it was a long night. It is over.

*** For the conversation between myself & the female feminist Palastinian who agreed women were worth 50% of a man, please view my twitter account 4/05/2016 as I can’t screen shot every image for this blog. Thank you

In the UK, we have a sharp paradigm of confusion with regards to liberalism and progressiveness. Of recent years our intention to build a fairer society with justice for all has tipped over the edge – landing on the opposite end of the scale. Long gone are the days of widespread racism & misogyny; sadly, instead of being replaced by less racism and less misogyny – we have replaced it with a group of people so afraid they might have offended someone somewhere, that they make sure they call out every sentence ever uttered for the supposed bigotry it is. If you dare say that “All lives matter” instead of just “black lives matter” you are branded racist and publicly harassed – which is odd, as if you said the same thing in 1970’s Britain you would have probably been harassed for saying “black lives matter” at all.

We are now in a state of panic, where asking questions like “Why exactly is Caitlin Jenner brave?” Is enough to get you fired and compared to Hitler by hundreds of thousands on twitter. No one ever seems to take a question as genuine anymore, especially when it is easier to screenshot and throw abuse. Most nowadays misunderstand abuse, they don’t see the difference between hurling abuse, and then hurling abuse at someone for doing the same thing. If someone on twitter claims “all black people are criminals” you would be just as abusive to tweet back a message that degrades him by the colour of his skin. This is hard to explain to the online community. They believe their bigotry is somehow protected as it is used to fight someone else’s. The mind boggles.

This week a 43 year old woman from Bicester, who must have been emotionally affected by the events in Paris took to her company’s facebook page to proclaim the following:

Blinks of Bicester are no longer taking bookings from anyone from the Islamic faith whether you are UK granted with passport or not,”

After screenshots & RT’s galore, on top of the barrage of hate-mail and abuse she has undoubtedly received – she has now been arrested after complaints of “racial abuse”. This must remind you of the cake shop in the United States which similarly refused to bake cakes for gays based on religious grounds. Both are as futile and childlike. A few things I have a problem with:

How will she know who is Islamic or not? If they are white and shave the beard she would be none the wiser. The fact she thinks she can spot a Muslim, even though racially they are diverse and normally only recognised by their facial hair – this is the only part where I think the race card can certainly be used. As Islam and Muslim is not, I repeat NOT a race. If you don’t understand that, ask your nearest biologist or pick up a dictionary.

How exactly is she racially abusing? Can a tweet, although utterly stupid, but completely vague and non-targeted to a specific human be counted as such? Other than the underlying idea she can spot one based on appearance does this barely count as racial – but even then it is at a push.

And is it abuse? Genuinely, would this count as abuse?

Maybe it is, who knows. I do know that it is social media suicide, and if her business lasts till next Christmas I will be surprised.

Don’t get me wrong, I do not support this woman. I think she is a fool & also quiet idiotic to think her “stand” will do anything but cause an outcry of hate in her direction, not the support she probably expected. She should have waited a few hours after her anger died down to think twice about such a post. But here is a thought. Why was she arrested? Isn’t the online onslaught she has endured the price she must pay? I would expect so.

In the U.K. we have allowed a man with a child on his shoulders sitting on top of a 5 foot ISIS flag to parade around the streets of London as if it were a normal outfit. He was not arrested by the way. We have accepted the normality of letting actual terrorists like Michael Adebolajo protest on our streets who would end up beheading a British Soldier in Woolwich; terrorist organisations & sympathisers like CAGE who find any way to absolve terrorists and instead blame anything with links to the U.K. or Tony Blair – They claim not to be terrorist friendly, yet are publicly friendly with known terrorists and just seem to agree on about every subject with said terrorists – but I’m splitting hairs. Did I mention these hate groups and hateful people get police protection paid for by the tax payers? Let’s not forget Anjem Choudary who has spent the best part of a decade preaching hate against the U.K. government which just so happens to pay all of his bills and protected him with 24 hour police care. Many U.K. nationals who idolise Choudary then go on to fight in the Middle-East for groups such as ISIS. His links with terrorism are out in the open, his support is unashamed. Yet it took the U.K. over 10 years to arrest him with “encouraging support for terrorism”, but only took 24 hours to arrest a woman for a banal facebook post.

Where exactly do our priorities lay? The police didn’t do this alone, public complaints in the thousands most likely helped, so why were the same “liberals” and “leftists” not petitioning for Choudary’s arrest 10 years ago? Why did it take the U.K. government over 12 years to finally have Abu Qatada extradited to face terror charges (which a corrupt court found to be unsubstantiated) – even though the U.N. and all other experts have evidence of his links to Al Qaeda) but it took the U.K. police no time at all to arrest a women for saying something silly about Muslims in a tweet?

It seems strange to me that I can turn on my TV to watch Muslims using U.K. free speech laws to protest against free speech (Yes, they are that stupid) or catch them with signs like those below

Yet none of these men are arrested. None of them are outed on facebook or twitter to the hordes of hundreds of thousands of online bullies. This is one of the many ways in which the left fails, not the real left like myself who actually stands for liberal principals, but the newly named “regressive left”.

Are we really saying that an extremist can waltz through our streets expressing his/her interest in bringing chaos and murder to our country, but if an idiot with a social media account says “[Insert derogatory term] + Islam” that we must draw a line for justice?

I stand for free speech, I for one think these extremists should be allowed to protest and spew their hate any day of the week, although without police protection – furthermore I believe if you accept this, you must accept and allow this woman to post her nonsensical message of not serving anyone of the “Islamic faith”. It’s only fair, right?

Freedom of speech works both ways, for messages we adore and ones we abhor – many “leftists” have seemed to completely forgotten about that.

Just over a month ago, on October 1st, I wrote a piece about a Muslim child who was arrested for making a bomb hoax. I made a few important points that I won’t go over now – but I find it right to mention a similar thread which will align here. At the end of the blog I give reasons as to why a school would react in such a way to a Muslim child who had what looked like a bomb in his possession. Let’s not forget his engineer teacher had told him to hide the clock as he thought other teachers may suspect it a bomb, the child ignored this and then refused to answer teachers when the suitcase began to tick. Truth is, no matter what faith, this child would have been arrested. But we cannot ignore the elephant in the room.

In the height of the IRA crisis, it was the norm for call centre operatives to be trained on how to deal with potential bomb threats – especially from Irish callers. Nearly every news story about terrorism or bombs would have been linked to the IRA. But never did you hear the word “Irishaphobia” uttered; never did the news call the organisation “the so called IRA”, nor did anyone ever say in the pub (pre facebook) “stop blaming ALL Irish, it’s only a few bad apples!” or “they aren’t really Irish”

It seems with the IRA we were smart enough to know it wasn’t all of Ireland. We were intellectually honest enough not to invent pointless words like Irishaphobia. Oh how times have changed. The reason why it was a normal reaction to arrest the child, was because in the last decade or so, terrorism has ultimately been monopolised by Muslims. These are not Muslims but terrorists you say? Nonsense. One can be a good Muslim, one can also be a bad Muslim – we don’t go around excommunicating based on bad actions. If a man prays to Allah 5 times a day, and actually lives his life by the ancient scriptures of the Koran and Hadith – of which is the basis of Islamism, Jihadism & fundamentalist Islam – who are we to say he isn’t Muslim enough?

Hitler for example, was a Roman Catholic, his soldiers’ belt buckles read “GOD WITH US” engraved in their native tongue. In fact his book Mein Kampf mentions Jesus and God more than it does his own family. We cannot simply deny his faith because he exterminated generations of innocent humans; no more than we can deny a man of being a “true father” if he beats his children – sure he isn’t a good one, but biology doesn’t change with the PC feelings of the western populous.

Muslims who take care of their fellow neighbours, and raise money for charities are good Muslims who would, in my opinion, be just as good without their holy book. Muslims who marry children or chop the heads of infidels are bad people, but that doesn’t negate the fact that they are still Muslim. Especially when both the actions of marrying children and chopping heads off of infidels are written in black and white inside the Koran (Mohammed married a 6 year old; along with crucifiction and many other actions can decapitation be found)

The main crux is this. I ended the blog with a statement about how most people are blindly walking into a sharp knife, by parading themselves as left wing peace lovers on facebook, who claim every one is perfect, evil doesn’t exist and Islam has no bad passages. The majority of those on my facebook have absolutely no expertise on this subject, and couldn’t distinguish a bible verse from a hadith for a million pounds. Sadly social media has created a platform where all of our baseless and useless thoughts are somehow valued as important. I know nothing of ballet or Opera, thefore would never post a status about it – I do wish the vast majority of the country would stop becoming moral philosophers every time a country is invaded or a terrorists attacks a victim, because 20 statuses later and you still know fuck all about the subject.

Many sheep like humans are now known to post images and memes regarding Koran 5:32 which states:

…Whosoever kills an innocent human being, it shall be as if he has killed all mankind, and whosoever saves the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind…”

This is beautiful. In truth it is one of the most out of context verses ever used in debate. For one, notice it says “innocent” and not “any” – Do ISIS see us as innocent? Of course not, therefore this verse commands our death by proxy. But what most don’t know, is the very next verse. Which not only takes back the previous one, but explicitly calls for death.

Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth (to cause) corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides of that they be exiled from the land…” – Koran 5:33

I wonder why people on facebook don’t post 5:32 and 5:33 back to back…

When the current leaders of ISIS say “you in the west let women drive and therefore you are at war with Allah” They specifically invoke chapter 5 verse 33 as evidence for justly murdering us. And as we are not innocent in their eyes, chapter 5 verse 32 isn’t applicable. I urge those who did not know of this verse, please stop debating Islam on the internet, as you only make it worse for those who actually understand this topic.

The statistics that no one will post on facebook, and that will get no shares or likes are as follows. In the October piece, up until that point there had been 230 known terrorist attacks worldwide in 2015. I will copy the findings below, to your amazement.

Let that settle in. We keep reading these nonfactual memes that you are more likely to choke on a peanut than be killed by a Muslim radical. Well I don’t see peanuts on the list, but I see it is a hell of a lot safer next to a Jew then a Muslim. These figures do not include the massacre of Paris Friday 13th – so the 91.3% figure will have surely risen.

Are you ready to be reasonable and talk about the influence that not only religion but belief has on a human’s actions?

Are you ready to morally accept that the more you lie on facebook about how everyone wants to get a long that you are letting a radical ideology take over the world you say you hold sacred? Unless we accept these findings, we cannot begin to counter them.

Not all Muslims are terrorists, but 91.3% of terrorism worldwide from January 1st 2015 to October 1st 2015 was carried out by Muslims only.

Think it over.

Rest in peace to all of our fallen friends in Paris; and for moral relativism, for all deaths at the hands of fanatics, especially Muslims in the Middle East and Central Africa who bear the brunt of Jihadism.

Share this:

Like this:

It’s not their fault, mostly. There are many on twitter and other social sites that wait for an outrage, tweet the politically correct statement and hope for likes and admiration. Even if they haven’t the slightest idea. Others cannot help being sucked into the media frenzy.

TV shows about benefit scroungers are all the rage, millions of us take to twitter to give our boring opinions. We do this without noticing benefit scams are so insignificant that it’s hardly worth arguing over. Benefits are overwhelmingly used by working people to top up low pay and pensioners. In fact the vast majority of benefit claimants are pensioners. But we still get carried away by blaming the “scum” who stay home.

Tonight it is a show about Britain first. (I believe although I haven’t seen it) once again all the twitter warriors who protest from their warm houses, using devices made by slave traded children in Asia are as vocal as ever.

Britain first couldn’t fit one stand in Goodison Park. Think of the shittest show ever to be on TV and cancelled after one episode, now notice that one episode had more viewers than Britain first has members.

Your anger and vitriol and perceived justice is nonsensical when you find out that there are a hundred times more people moaning about Britain first on twitter, than there are actual people in Britain first.

Don’t listen to them, they are idiots. There are many grievances and facts about horrible religions and nasty archaic ideologies from the middle East – but you can get these evidences from experts not xenophobes claiming to be liberals.

Stop feeding the media machine, you think you’re fighting the system but instead, TV bosses and twitter executives are laughing all the way to the bank whilst you debate a right wing organisation with less members than the ant and Dec fan club. All the while you are missing the real problems that need to be seriously debated. Like bankers and billionaires not paying tax, the government demonizing the poor or the lack of help for the aged or mentally ill.

Even I was duped by the seemingly over the top reaction by a Texas school teacher, who called the Police on a child, which led to his arrest on suspicion of bringing a bomb to school. Any sane person, reading the limited biased reports would think the same – especially when the words “police” & “Texas” are involved. The story began to unravel when I first saw an image of said “bomb”. My first reaction was, “Wow, that looks like a bomb.” In fact, if my life depended on it and I was given ten guesses, none of them would be “Clock?”

I have been told by facebook users, sorry, bomb specialists, that “no idiot would ever think that looked like a bomb”. Where is the TNT? C4? Dino-mite? These pseudo intellectuals don’t know their ass from their elbow, so I find it laughable that a vast majority of people that have only seen hollywood versions of bombs, believe they can spot one so easily. This is akin to disregarding humanities first contact with alien life because “It isn’t green, it hasn’t got a big head and it never asked to phone home!”

Remember the green and blue liquid bomb from ‘Die Hard with a Vengance’? To me it looked like 2 tubes of washing up liquid, with a corded phone attached to it. How about the giant red canister bombs near the films finale? I will post them below. I very much doubt real bombs look this way – but as we are all ignorant of bomb facts, why don’t we act humble enough to admit it and stop giving ourselves qualifications we don’t have.

I actually think Ahmed’s looks more sinister than the one in Die Hard. Now if this funny looking thing with a tiny speaker attached fooled us all back in the 90’s, how can we act like no one should have been concerned by the other image? – You compare them below.

Two major criticisms to mention:

We are told no one actually called a bomb squad, therefore the school knew it wasn’t a bomb and just wanted to humiliate the young Muslim, I find this hard to believe. Firstly, no police officer or public figure in America wants to be famous right now for offending Muslims – It is clearly toxic. In this day and age you can’t cough in the direction of a Muslim without offending 1.3 billion “peaceful” people. For example 78% of British Muslims (these are the ones we all agree are mostly peaceful and rational) believe that anyone drawing CARTOONS of the prophet Mohammed should be prosecuted. 68% said anyone insulting Islam should also face prosecution – more worrying was that 62% of those polled stated they believe freedom of speech should not be allowed as it offends religious groups. Does this sound like a rational majority to you? If 78% of British Christians believed making a cartoon about Jesus deserved prosecution, wouldn’t it be front page news? – We don’t mention this lest we be called bigoted by such theological intellectuals as Ben Afleck. As this British evidence might not suffice (rightly so) here is a US poll with 51% of US Muslims claiming they should have the right to Sharia courts instead of US courts – You know Sharia for such just sentences like ‘chopping off hands for theft’ or ‘killing adulterers’. I understand the % of right-wing Christians would also show strange results, but when added to terrorist offenses using bombs, you will understand my inclusion (nearer the bottom)

Secondly, we hear from such people as Ron Reagan – the son – (usually a reasonable thinker, void of his fathers lunacy) who says “It didn’t look like a bomb because nothing was attached to it, no explosives can be seen”- again, other than a hollywood production, none of us really know what that image would look like. I can’t tell anthrax from powdered sugar, can you?

If I had a child in school and just one teacher thought they saw another child with a gun/bomb/knife I would want them to react as this Texan teacher did. Remove the possible threat immediately. It’s no good saying that Ahmed hurt nobody; hindsight is 20/20. If this had been an explosive which indeed killed children, all these far left pundits would have asked “Why didn’t anybody call the police? My children are not safe in school!”

9 times out of 10 it may be a false alarm, but I wouldn’t want to be the teacher who when the 10th time came around allowed 50 children to die because I was too afraid to offend a kid from an ethnic minority. I’d rather some hurt feelings than a body count. Actually, if my child had taken such an item to school and was arrested, I would understand – It looks like a fucking bomb, what can I say?

If you aren’t offended yet, here it comes. I think Ahmed purposely aimed to achieve such a reaction. I did stupid things for attention as a child and other things just for shits and giggles. I once planted a long range walky-talky behind a packet of crisps in a local shop to haunt customers with such witty quips like “buy me, I’m so tasty yet so creamy” & “please don’t eat me, I have kids!”

I felt like a prick when I had to go into the shop and ask the shop keeper for my walky-talky back. But I was a child, it was my job to be immature, who else would do it for me?

Here are a few interesting points.

Ahmed kept showing the clock to teachers of various subjects, not just science teachers; a ruckus or admiration – either way he was looking for attention. Something he stated himself “I wanted to impress my teachers.” And good for him, I’ve done similar things to be accepted by my intellectual superiors, nothing was better than being praise by a teacher as a child.

When he was pressed on what was in the suitcase, he reportedly didn’t reply, making the teacher more nervy about its contents – Which began to tick. Yes, tick.

A 14 year old boy maybe shouldn’t be taken at his word, especially when it has now been proven that he invented diddlysquat. The “invention” was using a screw driver to open a digital clock and place it inside a suitcase. That’s like taking a condom out of a wrapper and saying I’ve cured AIDS.

Ahmed has now left school (although technically still suspended) to go on a tour of news organisations, not exactly fitting with his “desire for knowledge” we’ve heard so much about.

When questioned by reporters, the answers given clearly be heard in the background as they are relayed to him via his sister – before he recites verbatim. This child can’t answer his own questions let alone build his own clock.

This uproar, which can be predicted by any young Muslim aware of the issues surrounding Islam in 2015, would herald, one would expect, not only public outcry, fame, but also monetary value. He has received thousands in gifts, scholarships to schools he simply hasn’t the education to attend (Let’s not forget, this publicity stunt has just taken a college place away from a genuine child looking for higher education, who had such grades to warrant a place) Does none of this compel you to think he may have outwitted the general public for 15 minutes of fame and a new X-box? Watch his youtube interviews and I beg you to not notice the excitement from a child who has just become the next ‘Balloon boy’.

Other “inventions” by Ahmed shown on ‘Good Morning America’ include taking a motherboard out of a computer and … that’s it! I’ve taken countless computers apart, I had no idea I was such a prolific inventor – I’m sure Obama will invite me to the White House any day now…

Ahmed has now been invited to Google’s science fair. Where a real 15 year old inventor has created an automated method for finding and characterising gravitationally lensed quasars. Another boy of 16 invented an inexpensive test for the Ebola virus.

Ahmed is about to hit the phase of this whirlwind where he notices he fucked up and must face the music. In a room full of genuine inventors who will probably go on to be world changing physicists and disease curers, Ahmed will stand to hushed silence as he says “Look! And behold my new invention! I’ve taken the pages out of a book – I call it paper! … No? erm OK, I’ve opened a plug and found these wire thingys? … No? erm, well, I took a coffee machine apart with a hammer … that must mean something, right?”

Whilst the 15 year old replies “Do you even know what a quasar is?” and the 16 year old says “I’m literally saving Ebola patients … is this boy for real?”

Here is a snippet of a recent report:

“Ahmed said he first showed his invention to his engineering teacher, who gave him some advice.

‘He was like, “That’s really nice. I would advise you not to show that to other teachers.”

He kept the clock in his bag, but it started to beep later in the day during an English class. He then showed his clock to the teacher who said it looked like a bomb.”

He ignored the advice of his engineering teacher, because he knew – at least in that moment – what could be thought of such an item. His bomb-looking clock began to beep during class? If you honestly think an engineer would have reason to suspect a laymen would think it was a bomb – why wouldn’t you think the same when it begins to beep? Come on, the beeping is when even the most liberal and unoffensive of us say “OK, everyone run!”

In this day and age, especially in America, children are often killed in schools. It is a common occurrence, and although we hate to admit it, another common occurrence is bombs exploding at the hands of a Muslim – any age. You can argue this is Islamophobic – but you can’t argue with factual statistics. No one has a monopoly on bombing innocent people in the last 3 decades like those who follow Islam. The precaution taken was apt. Whole airports are shut down if someone dares to leave a subway bag unattended in the baggage claim. We can all call ourselves liberal and sing ‘we are the world’, but the truth is, post 9/11 we all feel a tad uncomfortable when a Muslim steps on a flight, just like we feel uncomfortable walking past a gang of youths at night – the chances of trouble are slim – but we might be in the slim minority. If a Muslim of any age walked up to you in an airport holding a suitcase that was ticking, would you say “Oh wow, what an amazing clock – can I look closer?” Or would you shit yourself and run?

The people online who suddenly became experts in bombs last week, also became structural engineers on youtube when the twin towers fell. They become experts on the constitution when gun laws are debated; they also become scientists when the subject of evolution is mentioned. You may also know them as that one guy who comments on all porn videos with “this faggot and his limp dick can’t fuck, she needs a real man like me!” – yet they have no discernible expertise, or experience with real physical bedroom activity.

Those who feel my diatribe is Islamophic, firstly, grow a brain cell and stop being offended by your own shadow. Secondly, notice that although we can make smoke without fire – we cannot deny that some stereotypes come from real places.

Religions are not equal, they do not pose the same threat. We know the majority of Muslims are not terrorists – but we also know at the same time the vast majority of terrorist acts in the last 3 decades have been performed by Muslims. These statements are both true and do not contradict one another. Furthermore, if we remember that Christians nearly outnumber Muslims 2:1 and notice we hardly ever hear about Christian terrorism, we must admit that no media bias big enough could hide that fact that Muslims have a fetish for terror that had no modern day equivalent. The % and ratio of extremist Muslims to peaceful Muslims is astonishingly scary when we compare it to any other religion. This is a fact we all have to come to terms with.

If you think the “Muslim terrorist” stereotype isn’t based on facts, then now you have no excuse for ignorance. 91.3% isn’t a minority – it’s the opposite.

Ahmed didn’t choose the colour of his skin nor his religion: One was forced upon him via his DNA, the other forced on him by his parents. Sadly for Ahmed, he just happened to be born in a time when the majority of terrorism is committed by people who share his faith – So the reaction of the school and police wasn’t anti-Muslim, it was in fact completely justified by all international statistics.

Ask yourself this question, If Ahmed was called Patrick and this happened in 1970’s Belfast – Would the police have been called? Yes.

And would I branded Irish or IRA-aphobic?

Of course not.

Finally, below are some images of real/fake bombs from google images. Can you, with 100% certainty tell which are benign and which are dangerous? Would you bet the lives of many school children on it? Doubt it.

Saudi Arabia has been elected to head a key UN panel on Human Rights. They now have powers that include being able to choose the delegates who get to investigate claims of human rights abuses. In essence, the rapists are getting to choose which of their most mentally handicapped victims will get to testify against them. How can we let the world’s worst human rights abusers lead the fight against human rights abuses?

It is an utter disgusting turn of events and in my opinion is one of the worst political decisions in the last century.

Saudi Arabia, our “ally”, is a state that commits worse atrocities than North Korea and it doesn’t hide behind a secretive wall to do it. In full view of the public and with a rather high amount of personal adulation, they:

Conducted more than 100 executions since January 1st 47 of which were for nonviolent drug offenses – like drinking a glass of wine or smoking pot and in the worst case smuggling heroine

5 Yemeni’s in Saudi Arabia charged with robbery and murder are here beheaded and hung for public display in 2013.

The list goes on and on. Basically the vilest things your imagination can muster, have been done 10x over in Saudi Arabia. And for those brave enough to have clicked the youtube links above, these executions are as shocking, stomach turning and vomit inducing than any scene from the nastiest of horror movies. We separate ourselves from reality when we watch films like ‘Hostel’, not knowing the most horrific of scenes from those films don’t even come close to the real torture that happens daily in Saudi Arabia.

We let the Saudi’s do this for one reason, oil. We need their oil supply and to a lesser extent we stay afloat by selling them weapons like guns, battleships, helicopters and fighter-jets. Imagine for a moment that Hitler’s Germany stood atop the worlds biggest oil field. Do you think we would have fought against him? By sheer logic, this ruling at the UN proves that Nazi Germany would have gone untouched if only they had an oil supply.

The Saudi’s are the world’s largest oil supplier, the second largest arms importer and spend the forth highest amount on military expenditure. When the time is right, who do you think the Saudi’s will aim their weapons at? Their Muslim brothers in the east or the western nations that live for everything they despise?

The first commercial oil well in Saudi Arabia was built in 1938, since then they have risen to being one of the richest nations on earth. They don’t have anything of worth other than oil. So as soon as oil runs out, they will fall back into the excuse for a state they used to be. No surprise then that the Saudi’s and their Qatar allies have spent much of their income on buying a massive amount of London. You now can’t throw a rock in our capital city without hitting an area that has been bought by middle eastern states including the Saudi’s. Even Scotland Yard is being mentioned as a potential new investment. The Arabians have also looked to solidify their monetary foundation once the oil disappears by buying stock in well known companies like Disney, Twitter & Apple.

Still, it isn’t too late to kill the dragon before it reaches maturity. Just one serious 12 month period by western countries into clean & renewable energy would cripple the Saudi’s. Just a few steps that would eradicate the demand for oil. They might seem extreme, but in reality they are completely possible.

Offer giant tax breaks to car companies who build a minimum of 70% electrical vehicles or cover the cost of converting current motors.

Put a 15-20% tax on any petrol or diesel vehicle sold, forcing the public to buy the cheaper & cleaner alternative.

Place a similar tax on petrol or diesel for personal motors. (I know this might garner outrage but only because people need cheap petrol, if it became substantially cheaper to run an electric motor, then petrol prices could hit £3 a ml and not a fuck would be given as it would not effect the consumer.

Ask BP & other oil companies to build electric pumps at every petrol station, and to keep them from abstaining due to personal interest, offer them first dibs on investment contracts in the electrical market.

Give subsidies to car companies and the population for part exchanging their old cars for electric versions.

This would reduce the demand substantially, putting power back into the hands of western nations.

The simple fact is that it is not cost effective for car manufacturers to build electric cars. The market is tiny.

Manufacturers will not bend over backwards to save our planet – but they will adhere to a changing market. If BMW were offered one year of no corporation tax in return for a push on electric cars – they would take the deal. If we offered BP or Shell a similar contract to add electric outlets to all of their petrol stations – they would oblige. They will get rich in the short term due to even less taxes, but in the long term we will rid ourselves of the archaic use of fossil fuels.

Many countries have used economic tricks for the betterment of domestic prosperity. Like targeted tariffs for instance, which are taxes on imports to counterbalance their cheaper price, therefore making the import price equal to its domestic comparable product – this is a commonplace economic system which is used in most advanced nations.

For example if a can of U.S. Pepsi costs 50p but a can of Canadian cola costs 20p, The U.S. would tax the Canadian import 30 pence – to give their domestic product a fighting chance.

Money is sadly the only power our society values and stupidly we are not using it to our advantage. Sure, the UK makes billions from the Saudi’s in the short term from sold weapons. But as stated earlier in the long term said weapons will destroy us. Our objective should be to eliminate the value of oil, therefore diminishing the power of rogue states like the Saudi’s. In turn we will help save our planet – what is stopping us?

We are a country that instead of sitting on our hands, enjoying histories largest Empire and watching the world burn. We chose to spend every penny we had fighting in two World Wars; the second of which bankrupted our nation, dissolved our Empire and took away our global leading status to the Americans.

We did it because it was the right thing to do. It’s a sad fact that the United States got tremendously wealthy off of the World Wars. Maybe if we were more cold-hearted we would have done the same – but I am proud of our stance and would rather a dead empire than a dead soul. It’s no secret that the U.S. gained wealth for 60 years using slave-labour after the rest of the world abolished it. Also no secret they abstained from the World Wars until it was completely unavoidable for them – instead of standing against the human rights abuses from day one like other morally respectable countries did. As you can see I digress. My point is, how far back have we gone? what ground have we lost? Where is the morality that led us to fight the Nazi’s? That Britain simply does not exist anymore, and when nonsensical right-wingers say “Our Britain isn’t Great anymore!” I agree nearly vomit knowing I agree with them.

It may be a bloody fight, especially if the Saudi’s begin to notice their loss in exports: see the death of the USSR for reference of a dying state fighting back. But it is a cause no less worthy than the threat of Nazism.

Now, to address the elephant in the room. Although, in my opinion Saudi Arabia is the perfect example of what a true Islamic State can be, this is no fault of Islam. This is a Kingdom with absolute power which happens to find that the callous shoe of extremist Islam fits perfectly. If Islam had not had a hold on the region for so long, I’m sure they would have taken a North Korean style of diplomacy. If secularism was a staple of their society, a more Stalin-like proposal would meet the needs. This proposal doesn’t lead to another crusade like war. It is an economic sanction used to speed up the process of non fossil fuel dependency.

With the strong arm of economic diplomacy, we can end a tyrannical kingdom whilst saving our planet from overuse of fossil fuels. Most importantly it will give us back the power to stand up against evil in the world, instead of turning a bling eye as we do now in the name of economic prosperity. United Kingdom, For shame!

Share this:

Like this:

I don’t see this woman as a feminist, she is clearly a misandrist who thinks she classifies as a feminist based on the organ between her legs. Just as being white doesn’t make me an expert on white studies (whatever that may be) & being a male doesn’t make me a misogynist (shocking I know).

I won’t use her name here, as the last thing I want to do is write another blog that gets shared over 3000 times on facebook – and gives this author some undeserved sales and publicity. Not usually one for petty jokes, but a quick look at her twitter page shows an ego that would rival Donald Trump’s. She would surely have more than 900 followers on twitter if the world felt the same way about her, as she did about herself.

Last night it seemed many were upset that Jeremy Corbyn looked to be creating a male-centric shadow cabinet, with a majority of males in the most “important” roles. These people had significantly jumped the shark after the appointment of Tom Watson as Deputy leader of the party – thinking it would be a sign of things to come. Corbyn ended with 16 females and 14 males. There may be some reason for upset regarding the top jobs, but with females taking up the positions of:

Shadow first secretary of State, Shadow secretary of state for business, innovation and skills – Angela Eagle

Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury – Seema Malhotra

Opposition Chief whip – Rosie Winterton

Shadow secretary of state for health – Heidi Alexander

Shadow secretary of state for education – Lucy Powell

Shadow secretary of state for defence – Maria Eagle

Shadow secretary of state for energy & climate change – Lisa Nandy

Shadow secretary of state for transport – Lilian Greenwood

Shadow secretary of state for international development – Diane Abbott

Shadow minister for young people & voter registration – Gloria De Piero

Shadow minister for mental health – Luciana Berger

Shadow leader of the House of Lords – Lady Smith

Shadow attorney general – Catherine McKinnell

Now some may say these are minimal or less important jobs, minister for mental health maybe? Not to me, regardless of my battle with mental health – I have seen the fantastic work Luciana Berger has done in the past few years, and how many lives her work has probably saved. Not a small job in my opinion.

On to the topic at hand. Let’s see if I am deserving of such childish anger as will be posted below.

Is this reaction warranted? The only part of my tweet that could be taken with such offence might be the mention of “genitals” but this is only a problem to the weak-minded millennials who take offence at the blowing wind. One can see the usual angry twitter reply, the type one would expect from a child and not someone expecting to be respected. Why does the internet bring out the inner angry child in everyone? Why can we watch a video of a parrot trying to speak English on youtube and scroll down to see one human reply with “Fuck this parrot in his ass, can’t speak no shit!”

I am still trying to calm this emotional woman down by not replying with vitriol but with confirmation that I wanted her opinion. But that is a step too far for some “feminists”, how dare a man ask a woman a question – isn’t that racist, bigoted, sexist & islamophobic? Right?

Much worse, she uses a strawman and pretends I claimed men deserved all political jobs that women didn’t have, I guess she means even the jobs women didn’t apply for!

“I never considered it might just be that no women have ever been better at the jobs they are consistently passed over for.”

She implies here that I did say that? What complete nonsense? How far does she have to reach into her ass to find that angry-typical-internet-feminist reply?!

But her nonintellectual, angry and childish tirade doesn’t end there.

As is the way of losers, they take to their own twitter page, to speak about you to their followers (the majority of which are follow for follow) – untagged of course.

She continues to give replies to horrible statements I never made, and getting worked up for conversations that no one is having with her. Delusional? It’s sad she fits into so many stereotypes that misogynists use to pigeon-hole women. Anyone notice the very anti-male vibe in her tweets? I guess, sexism only works when males paint a broad brush regarding females and never the other way round. Or at least in the mind of pseudo-intellectuals who are offended when the mail man says “hi” only to reply with “STOP OPPRESSING ME YOU MALE PIG!”

A reply of “Yes, but still would be nice to see more women in politics.” Would have sufficed. I would have agreed and moved along. But some angry, self-victimised women can’t help themselves can they?