Sunday, October 16, 2011

A.G.K. Menon, the conservationist in charge of preparing Delhi’s bid to be declared a World Heritage City by the United Nations, said on Tuesday that one of the city’s unique contributions to humanity was its hybrid personality formed over thousands of years — exemplified by its mix of architectural styles and its unique brand of Sufi mysticism.

Judging by the crowd at one of the first public consultations on Delhi’s application, which has to be submitted by Feb. 1, 2012, he should have added “its rambunctiousness,” too.

The draft dossier, now online, describes a plan to apply for heritage status for four historic areas of a city that has been the seat of empire after empire, most of which have left legacies still visible today.

The four areas selected are 17th-century Shahjahanabad, or Old Delhi; the early 19th-century Lutyens bungalow zone; Mehrauli, which has monuments dating back to the 8th century; and Nizamuddin, home to a revered 16th-century Sufi shrine.

After discussions with historians and officials, many areas and epochs didn’t make the cut, including the Raj-era Connaught Place, neighborhoods like 13th-century Hauz Khas, or ruins like Tughlaqabad, the city founded in the early 14th-century by Turkish ruler Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq.

Mr. Menon and other speakers urged Delhi residents to actively participate in the application process. The crowd of intellectuals and students took those words to heart, beginning with Aman Nath, co-chairman of Neemarana hotels, which converts old palatial properties for contemporary use.

“Lutyens did not build one single bungalow in what we call Lutyens bungalow zone,” said Mr. Nath. “It’s a joke…and I think you should correct that nomenclature.”

British-built New Delhi, which was formally inaugurated in 1931, and now forms the center of the Indian capital, is widely known after British architect Edwin Lutyens. Together with fellow architect Herbert Baker, he is credited with designing and building the new capital of the Raj.

Mr. Nath went on to say that if the city plans to honor British-built Delhi by the name of a particular architect, the same honor should go to the builders of Old Delhi — not to the Mughal emperor who had it built.

“On the other hand when you’re saying Shahjahanabad, you’re saying Shahjahan built the city, he didn’t build the city,” said a passionate Mr. Nath. “It was Makaramat Khan and there were two architects.”

Soon a conversation broke out: Should the Lutyens zone be renamed the Russel zone, after Robert Tor Russel, the architect behind Connaught Place and many buildings in the Lutyens’ zone, or even more generally, Imperial Delhi?

A woman in the audience then questioned whether the Lutyens zone should be a heritage area when many of its buildings are off-limits to the public.

“It is this Lutyens zone which is not accessible to people. We are not able to see the government buildings,” she said. “It would be nice if we can get access to these places as citizens. The other three zones we can walk in, anywhere.”

Gagandeep Singh, a 20-year-old history student raised a different objection — about how the city’s historical monuments are described.

He noted that the Qutub Minar, the minaret in Mehrauli on which construction was begun by Delhi’s first Muslim ruler near the close of the 12th century, had a plaque noting that Hindu and Jain buildings on the site had been razed to build the monument, a detail that he felt was unnecessary to mention. He later said he though such notations were “provocative.”

“What will international travelers think about our country?” he told the crowd. “This should be amended.”

Others wondered whether the heritage city designation would “freeze” the historical zones and what would happen to the people living there — should development around the sites be stopped or aloud to continue? That’s an ongoing tussle around historic sites in the city. Recent news reports suggest people living around the Tughlaqabad ruins are slated to be evicted, although some of them claim to have been living there for hundreds of years.

Soon there was a fabulous chorus of people interrupting one another (quite politely, for a Delhi crowd) to interject, “May I say something?” Ah, Delhi.

Tuesday’s event is part of an ongoing public consultation process that continues through next month, and will include both limited attendance seminars about each of the four zones and public lectures.

Picture: Nizamuddin’s Sufi shrine is among the four selected areas for “heritage status.” In the image above, muslims offered prays at the shrine in New Delhi, Aug 2010. Photo: Manpreet Romana/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.

A.G.K. Menon, the conservationist in charge of preparing Delhi’s bid to be declared a World Heritage City by the United Nations, said on Tuesday that one of the city’s unique contributions to humanity was its hybrid personality formed over thousands of years — exemplified by its mix of architectural styles and its unique brand of Sufi mysticism.

Judging by the crowd at one of the first public consultations on Delhi’s application, which has to be submitted by Feb. 1, 2012, he should have added “its rambunctiousness,” too.

The draft dossier, now online, describes a plan to apply for heritage status for four historic areas of a city that has been the seat of empire after empire, most of which have left legacies still visible today.

The four areas selected are 17th-century Shahjahanabad, or Old Delhi; the early 19th-century Lutyens bungalow zone; Mehrauli, which has monuments dating back to the 8th century; and Nizamuddin, home to a revered 16th-century Sufi shrine.

After discussions with historians and officials, many areas and epochs didn’t make the cut, including the Raj-era Connaught Place, neighborhoods like 13th-century Hauz Khas, or ruins like Tughlaqabad, the city founded in the early 14th-century by Turkish ruler Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq.

Mr. Menon and other speakers urged Delhi residents to actively participate in the application process. The crowd of intellectuals and students took those words to heart, beginning with Aman Nath, co-chairman of Neemarana hotels, which converts old palatial properties for contemporary use.

“Lutyens did not build one single bungalow in what we call Lutyens bungalow zone,” said Mr. Nath. “It’s a joke…and I think you should correct that nomenclature.”

British-built New Delhi, which was formally inaugurated in 1931, and now forms the center of the Indian capital, is widely known after British architect Edwin Lutyens. Together with fellow architect Herbert Baker, he is credited with designing and building the new capital of the Raj.

Mr. Nath went on to say that if the city plans to honor British-built Delhi by the name of a particular architect, the same honor should go to the builders of Old Delhi — not to the Mughal emperor who had it built.

“On the other hand when you’re saying Shahjahanabad, you’re saying Shahjahan built the city, he didn’t build the city,” said a passionate Mr. Nath. “It was Makaramat Khan and there were two architects.”

Soon a conversation broke out: Should the Lutyens zone be renamed the Russel zone, after Robert Tor Russel, the architect behind Connaught Place and many buildings in the Lutyens’ zone, or even more generally, Imperial Delhi?

A woman in the audience then questioned whether the Lutyens zone should be a heritage area when many of its buildings are off-limits to the public.

“It is this Lutyens zone which is not accessible to people. We are not able to see the government buildings,” she said. “It would be nice if we can get access to these places as citizens. The other three zones we can walk in, anywhere.”

Gagandeep Singh, a 20-year-old history student raised a different objection — about how the city’s historical monuments are described.

He noted that the Qutub Minar, the minaret in Mehrauli on which construction was begun by Delhi’s first Muslim ruler near the close of the 12th century, had a plaque noting that Hindu and Jain buildings on the site had been razed to build the monument, a detail that he felt was unnecessary to mention. He later said he though such notations were “provocative.”

“What will international travelers think about our country?” he told the crowd. “This should be amended.”

Others wondered whether the heritage city designation would “freeze” the historical zones and what would happen to the people living there — should development around the sites be stopped or aloud to continue? That’s an ongoing tussle around historic sites in the city. Recent news reports suggest people living around the Tughlaqabad ruins are slated to be evicted, although some of them claim to have been living there for hundreds of years.

Soon there was a fabulous chorus of people interrupting one another (quite politely, for a Delhi crowd) to interject, “May I say something?” Ah, Delhi.

Tuesday’s event is part of an ongoing public consultation process that continues through next month, and will include both limited attendance seminars about each of the four zones and public lectures.

Picture: Nizamuddin’s Sufi shrine is among the four selected areas for “heritage status.” In the image above, muslims offered prays at the shrine in New Delhi, Aug 2010. Photo: Manpreet Romana/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images.

No comments:

About Sufi News

Sufi News is a volunteer organization in the process of attempting to become financially viable. To this end, in part, we will depend upon reader financial support. So if you would like to see Sufi News continue, please consider making a one-time or regular donation.

Donate to Sufi News

To Readers and Authors:

Click on the title of each article in order to go to the original article. If you are the author of the article and do not want it republished here, please inform us and we will remove it. Click on the pictures to expand them.