The children of policemen entered the police service, the children of soldiers entered the military, the children of prison officers joined the prison service, the children of fire service officials, followed their parents into the service, if they wanted to.

As the angry young lady in the video said, they were barracks children of many generations. I doubt that the barracks children were or are any more qualified than the people that the politicians bring.

I do not suggest that people following their parents’ profession is peculiar to the services. It is the natural thing to do.

If I had been a little more obedient and listened to my father, I would have become a teacher like he was. Indeed he had assumed I would follow him into teaching.

Just as my childhood friend became a goldsmith like his father and another became a seamstress like her mother.

If you went into our medical schools, you will find that many of the medical students are the children of medical doctors and the law school has many students who are children of lawyers, and we all expect the children of our farmers to become farmers.

When Abedi Pele, our famous footballer encouraged all his sons to follow him into football, nobody thought it was strange.

All these examples would seem perfectly healthy when children are being encouraged to follow their parents’ profession, but it becomes insidious when the practice gives an unfair advantage to some and shuts the door on others.

I could never understand, for example, how the public universities justified giving a more generous cutoff entry grade to the children of staff members, but for years they did.

It is not unusual to find that an official establishment is populated solely by relations.

When the Railways were active, it was famous for employment practices that favoured taking on relations of those who work there. In other words, the barracks phenomenon is applicable in all other sections of the economy and society as a whole.

The Judicial Service has its own version of the barracks and children, cousins, uncles, aunties and friends expect and do get employed because that is how it has been done for years.

Politics is showing an interesting bloodline.

Samia Nkrumah has followed her famous father, the first President of Ghana into politics, and it is not clear what percentage of her votes are for the name, Nkrumah. Zanetor Rawlings is in Parliament with both her parents active in politics.

The point could be made that just as some children grow up with carpentry as background to their lives, she grew up with politics as her background noise.

Would she have won her seat if she were called Zanetor Mensah?

John Dramani Mahama’s father was a politician and a Minister in the First Republic, he followed him and went one further and became a President.

Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo our current President is the son of Sir Edward Akufo-Addo, a man with as impeccable a political pedigree as can be found, member of the Big Six, famous lawyer of his time, a Chief Justice and ceremonial President of the Second Republic.

More examples in India

Once I started looking, I found that there are many examples of the phenomenon. But I find that we are nowhere near as interesting as India.

Rahul Gandhi, president of the Indian National Congress knows just how ridiculous the Indian situation could be.

He comes from a long line of politicians, the Nehru-Gandhi family and he told a group of students:

“My father was in politics. My grandmother and great-grandfather were in politics. So, it was easy for me to enter politics. This is a problem. I am a symptom of this problem.”

A British writer, Patrick French points out in his book India: A Portrait, a fact that is apparently unremarkable to Indians but startling to outsiders when expressed through statistics.

One hundred per cent of the elected members in the lower house of the Indian Parliament who are under the age of 30 are from families with a political background.

I suggest you go back and read that sentence again: One hundred per cent of the elected members of the lower house of the Indian Parliament who are under the age of 30 are from families with a political background! Mr French calls them “hereditary MPs.”

Sixty-five per cent of members in the 31-40 age group are hereditary MPs.

The phenomenon is not limited to politics. Mr French found that in mainstream Hindi cinema, all the top actors cast in lead roles, barring one, were sons of former film stars, directors or writers. As is the case with several lead actresses and directors.

In other words, judging by these figures, it would appear that the thousands of young people who flock to Mumbai hoping to make it big have almost no chance of making it to the very top.

Our Parliament is not yet that interesting nor our music or film industry, but maybe we should keep an eye out. Maybe there is a case for breaking the barracks chain.