not to say there's reason to pick cls over hls without a cls $, just saying that in terms of ability to find a top firm job hls isn't really much better than cls and the schools are pretty comparable.still, go to harvard even if you're only goal is nyc v10. but not an absurd question.

not to say there's reason to pick cls over hls without a cls $, just saying that in terms of ability to find a top firm job hls isn't really much better than cls and the schools are pretty comparable.still, go to harvard even if you're only goal is nyc v10. but not an absurd question.

The fact that they are comparable in placement at top firms in no way implies that the ability to find a top firm job is equal at the two schools.

not to say there's reason to pick cls over hls without a cls $, just saying that in terms of ability to find a top firm job hls isn't really much better than cls and the schools are pretty comparable.still, go to harvard even if you're only goal is nyc v10. but not an absurd question.

The fact that they are comparable in placement at top firms in no way implies that the ability to find a top firm job is equal at the two schools.

I can only speak of two v10 firms, but at these two firms cls and hls general class rank cut-offs are the same. but yes, I'm not arguing that the ease of finding jobs is equal just that the huge number of cls alums at top big law firms means that the question isn't quizzical. its pretty to easy to understand why a 0L might ask the question given the raw data they'd find from google.

not to say there's reason to pick cls over hls without a cls $, just saying that in terms of ability to find a top firm job hls isn't really much better than cls and the schools are pretty comparable.still, go to harvard even if you're only goal is nyc v10. but not an absurd question.

The fact that they are comparable in placement at top firms in no way implies that the ability to find a top firm job is equal at the two schools.

I can only speak of two v10 firms, but at these two firms cls and hls general class rank cut-offs are the same.

not to say there's reason to pick cls over hls without a cls $, just saying that in terms of ability to find a top firm job hls isn't really much better than cls and the schools are pretty comparable.still, go to harvard even if you're only goal is nyc v10. but not an absurd question.

The fact that they are comparable in placement at top firms in no way implies that the ability to find a top firm job is equal at the two schools.

I can only speak of two v10 firms, but at these two firms cls and hls general class rank cut-offs are the same. but yes, I'm not arguing that the ease of finding jobs is equal just that the huge number of cls alums at top big law firms means that the question isn't quizzical. its pretty to easy to understand why a 0L might ask the question given the raw data they'd find from google.

how do you even know the class rank cutoffs for 2Ls? i had always imagined we wouldnt find out till graduation w/ certain honors, with all the HP/P/LPs going around...

either way, i cant imagine employment prospects in biglaw being better for CLS than HLS. are they far off? probably not, but i dont see a lot of reasons to choose CLS over HLS if biglaw is what OP wants (assuming no $ at either, since he didnt mention any). you'd have to hustle more at CLS with all them grades and all