Here is the raw text copied in from Bill Chumleys South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act that was prefiled today. I know there will be a bill # attached, I just dont have it now.

Im going to put up a few posts about this today. Well need your help as we move forward. Please read, study, and ask questions about this bill so you can give a quick explanation of it, and why our legislators need to now only vote for it but ADVOCATE for it and CO-SPONSOR it. There will be a companion bill in the Senate.

TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, SO AS TO ENACT THE SOUTH CAROLINA FREEDOM OF HEALTH CARE PROTECTION ACT BY ADDING ARTICLE 21 TO CHAPTER 71, TITLE 38, SO AS TO RENDER NULL AND VOID CERTAIN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS ENACTED BY THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TAKING CONTROL OVER THE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY AND MANDATING THAT INDIVIDUALS PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER THREAT OF PENALTY; TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS FROM ENFORCING OR ATTEMPTING TO ENFORCE SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS; AND TO ESTABLISH CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL LIABILITY FOR VIOLATING THIS ARTICLE.

Whereas, the people of the several states comprising the United States of America created the federal government to be their agent for certain enumerated purposes, and nothing more; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people of the several states to the federal government, and all power not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution of the United States is reserved to the states respectively, or to the people themselves; and

Whereas, Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution provides in pertinent part that All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States; and

Whereas, the judicial decision of the United States Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act directly contravenes Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution because, in upholding the law by re characterizing the Act as a tax even though Congress specifically refused to identify it as a tax, the United States Supreme Court legislated new law in violation of Article I, Section 1 of the United States Constitution; and

Whereas, the assumption of power that the federal government has made by enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act interferes with the right of the people of the State of South Carolina to regulate health care as they see fit and makes a mockery of James Madisons assurance in Federalist #45 that the powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined, while those of the states are numerous and indefinite. Now, therefore,

Section 38 71 2110. This article may be cited as the South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act.

Section 38 71 2120. The General Assembly declares that the federal law known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, is not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violates its true meaning and intent as given by the Founders and Ratifiers, and is invalid in this State, is not recognized by this State, is specifically rejected by this State, and is null and void and of no effect in this State.

Section 38 71 2130. It is the duty of the General Assembly to adopt and enact all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act within the limits of this State.

Section 38 71 2140. (A) An official, agent, or employee of the United States government or an employee of a corporation providing services to the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of this article is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. (B) A public officer or employee of the State of South Carolina who enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of this article is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than one thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Section 38 71 2150. An aggrieved party has a private right of action against a person violating a provision of this article and is entitled to the recovery of reasonable attorney fees incurred in prosecution of said action.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.