According to Freud, infants don't perceive the boundaries between themselves
and those around them; they have no sense of themselves as
individuals separate from their caregivers. I suspect that
blurring of identity goes both ways, perhaps especially for mothers, who so
recently held their infants in their bodies. Mommy and
Daddy know best, and for all that we're encouraged to watch our babies for
cues that they're hungry or sleepy, it's still the grownups who call the
shots. We control every aspect of our infants' lives, and
we like to think that we know everything there is to know about them.

I vividly remember a disorienting encounter I had when
Drew was a baby. He and I were at church, and a young
woman I didn't know came over and started talking to him. She
clearly knew him and he seemed to recognize her, but I didn't have a clue who
she was. How did this complete stranger know my child?
It turned out that she was a friend of his nanny's, and that he'd been
to visit her with the nanny. But it was an unsettling
reminder that, even at six-months-old, he already had a life that didn't
include me.

The separation process that starts at birth only
accelerates as children get older. As babies become
toddlers they begin to discover their own identities, and to assert their
wills on those around them. One of Alec's first complete
sentences was "I want chocolate milk!" and he continues to practice
the "I want" construction as much as possible. And
as much as it infuriates me to hear it, my older kids have both used the
phrase, "You're not the boss of me!" when they were balking at a
particularly onerous request from me or Adam.

As our children grow, the urge to protect them, and even
to control them, persists. This is especially apparent in
contemporary society. Not only are we more conscious of
safety equipment and seatbelts, but we also limit our children's movements
much more than in previous generations. I walked to school
by myself when I was in second grade, but in many school districts it's now
against the rules for elementary age kids to walk or ride their bikes to
school without a parent.

(continued at right)

And just as we want to protect our children's bodies, we
also want to protect their minds. We're surrounded by
things we may not want our children exposed to, from suggestive trailers that
run before family movies to violent and disturbing images on CNN.
Every parent has to fight those battles and decide what's appropriate
for her or his child, and no matter how carefully you try to protect your
kids, inevitably you'll be faced with some awkward conversations.
Since Drew has learned to read, I've developed a dread of public restrooms.
Luckily, he's usually willing to accept
"something that grownups do" as a definition for the words he reads
on the walls, and (so far) he hasn't felt compelled to repeat any of them at
the dinner table.

The desire to shelter your child is completely
understandable, but at what point does it become unrealistic? At
what point does protection turn into insulating your child from the world?
A group of parents recently sued a California school district for
surveying their children about sex, claiming that they have "the
exclusive right to talk to their children about sex." Across
the country, fundamentalist Christians are demanding that school districts
teach the so-called Intelligent Design theory instead of, or alongside, the
Theory of Evolution, and that sex ed classes be confined to scare stories
about sexually transmitted diseases and admonitions to remain chaste, rather
than providing information about human sexuality and birth control.
Many parents, terrified at the prospect of what their children might
be exposed to in the public schools, want vouchers so that they can send
their children to religious schools, and some parents choose to home school
their children to protect them from any contact with alternative points of
view (although obviously this isn't the only reason parents choose to home
school or send their children to private schools).

Parents should have the majority of the decision making
power about their own children. But as a society, we have
a vested interest in educating and training children, and in introducing them
to different people and ideas. There's something scary
about the notion that parents should have the "exclusive right" to
talk to their kids about anything. There's something
disturbing about the insistence that parents should be able to dictate the
exact content of their children's lessons, and that the most narrow-minded
parents should set the limits for all the children in a school. These
parents want to control, not only their own children, but everyone else's as
well, not to mention all the adults who ever come into contact with their
children.

Part of parenting *should* be about control.
Children need limits; they need someone to keep them from eating all
twenty pounds of their Halloween candy in one fell swoop and to make them go
to bed before midnight. But parenting is also about
letting go. One of the most important aspects of parenting
is teaching your child to be an independent, responsible adult, and that's
the part that I suspect some parents have forgotten. It's
as if they equate parenting with programming a computer -- they believe that
they can control the inputs so thoroughly that they can then control the
outputs and determine what the adult version of their child will think, feel,
and do. But the measure of your success as a parent isn't
in how well you've indoctrinated your child, it's in how well you've taught
her to think for herself. If you want that much control
over your child, make yourself a puppet. I don't want
Pinocchio; I want a real boy, smart mouth, rebellious streak and all.
___________
About the Author:
Melissa Lipscomb lives in Austin with her children Drew, Franny, Alec and
husband Adam. Some days she feels like she's figuring out, and others she's
just waiting for the other shoe to drop. Visit her blog.

I I
I
I I I
I

AustinMama operates on a shoestring budget, which is often untied
causing us to trip a lot. Our noses could probably use a good wiping,
too. But we are decent people who will never be too proud to accept
charitable donations to our cause. We promise.