“What do our results have to do with Global Warming, i.e., the century-scale response to greenhouse gas emissions? VERY LITTLE, contrary to claims that others have made on our behalf.”

These two articles at the Mail on Sunday and Telegraph, they conclude:

…continue the unfortunate trend of shoddy climate reporting in the two periodicals, particularly from David Rose. They suffer from cherry picking short-term data while ignoring the long-term human-caused trends, misrepresenting climate research, repeating long-debunked myths, and inventing IPCC meetings despite being told by climate scientists that these claims are pure fiction.

Based on their history of shoddy reporting, the safest course of action when reading a climate article in the Mail on Sunday or Telegraph is to assume they’re misrepresentations or falsehoods until you can verify the facts therein for yourself.

2 thoughts on “The Mail on Sunday and The Telegraph are still at it”

Many thanks for this. Sorry it took me a while to acknowledge, I didn’t know how the pingback works and I’m not sure I’m any the wiser now. I enjoyed my brief visit of cartesian product. I clicked the button and I shall be looking in from time to time.