Researchers break Newton’s third law — with lasers

Share This article

This story is steeped in conditional phrases and the trademark weirdness of quantum science, but for all that, it has serious implications for computing and for our basic understanding of physics. A team of researchers has managed to (very technically) break Newton’s third law of motion — that every action has an equal and opposite reaction — by accelerating laser pulses around a loop seemingly without any corresponding push-back.

The principles behind this breakthrough are airy new-physics ideas like “negative mass,” but the results are simple enough, and speak for themselves. With this team’s device, it’s possible for two pulses of light to both accelerateeach other in the same direction through an optical cable, potentially paving the way for advances in everything from communications to computing — with just a hint of starship engineering thrown in for fun.

The team refers to their device as an optical diametric drive, a very tenuous but still instructive comparison that refers to a hypothetical engine tech that could get humans to the stars. A diametric drive is basically an anti-gravity system that uses a block of material with negative mass to create a negative gravitational field that would endlessly repel an object with actual mass (a spaceship). If that sounds like utter fantasy, that’s because it is; the concept of negative gravity has no meaning in quantum physics, which works using mass-squared equations that make all negative mass parameters into positive ones. The idea of moving through space thanks to a block of material with a never-ending propulsive ability calls to mind the perpetual motion machines of days gone by.

Yup, that’ll work.

But could those old attempts have simply been too literal with their terminology? Though nothing remotely like an anti-gravity material has yet been found, light can have a negative effective mass if manipulated just right — and that’s what this team’s device is designed to do. The system takes pulses of light and splits each one between two connected fiber-optic loops of different length. Since the pulse takes a different amount of time to circle each loop, the result over many pulses is a complex interference pattern that causes the theoretically mass-less photons to behave as though they have mass. Precisely the right interference pattern will lead to an effectively negative mass. That’s certainly tidy, but could such obsessing over technicalities have actual, physical benefits?

Just as a block of negative mass would accelerate a starship; it seems that a photon of negative effective mass will accelerate a more conventional one. When two pulses with respectively positive and negative effective masses interact within the loops, they accelerate in the same direction. In the experiment, the team observed that once the system was up and running, both the positive and negative mass photons passed the detector just a little bit faster with every revolution. This required no extra energy input on their part.

The system splits pulses between the two loops so they interfere with themselves and each other in predictable ways.

This principle could potentially work with anything that can attain an effective mass — most notably, electrons in a semiconductor. The team suggests that their work could lead to everything from faster communications to more powerful computers, but those are likely almost as far out as interstellar anti-gravity drives. Of course, it’s fun to imagine chips with built-in accelerators, but the most realistic proximate impact of this research is for simple understanding. These pulses seem to slip through a loophole in Newton’s third law of motion, and it will be important to understand why playing with such technicalities still seems to have real-world impacts.

This study shows that even seemingly meaningless concepts can have real implications in modern physics; quantum physics may be a loopy mess of seemingly impossible concepts, but acting as if those concepts are true lets you put a man on the Moon and connect the world through global communications. This study implies that while negative mass might not actually exist, the concept itself could still let us find ways around previously impassable barriers.

Tagged In

Post a Comment

poken1151

Interesting oh so interesting, “negative mass”? I feel like they’re opening the Command Console of a physics engine and typing Photon_AA0223E3.SetProperty(“Mass”, “-1″); The concept sounds feasible if such a thing could exist, but I’m as unsure as I am on the feasibility of spawning a tank in real life.

jhewitt123

Nice point on the negative mass:

“the concept of negative gravity has no meaning in quantum physics, which works using mass-squared equations that make all negative mass parameters into positive ones”

I would suppose a similar explanation is the best one to be had for electromagnets, which always “pull in” no matter which way the coils run, or what the polarity of the voltage across them is. How do repulsive permanent magnets fit in to this framework?

jhewitt123

Nice point on the negative mass:

“the concept of negative gravity has no meaning in quantum physics, which works using mass-squared equations that make all negative mass parameters into positive ones”

I would suppose a similar explanation is the best one to be had for electromagnets, which always “pull in” no matter which way the coils run, or what the polarity of the voltage across them is. How do repulsive permanent magnets fit in to this framework?

AlainCo

Interesting…
It may be an open door for EmDrive.

At least EmDrive is re-validated by the Chinese team of Yang Juan in the Chinese School of Astronautics…

Joel Detrow

It’s been a good day for ET articles – much less of the sensational claptrap I’ve been seeing a lot of, and more of the brain-stimulating science, technology, and biology articles that I came to love from ET.

On topic, the concepts in this article are really exciting! Does it mean light could be accelerated faster than its normal speed limit? Could this phenomenon of apparent (but not actual) negative mass potentially be used as an energy source or method of propulsion? My brain is going wild with possibilities! What a time to be alive!

Jeff Vahrenkamp

if the photons were moving faster each time, that would suggest they were changing the refractive index of the material they were traveling in (I”m assuming it wasn’t a perfect vacuum). I’ll have to read the article, but it sounds like either this isn’t be described right or is one of those things where you’ll see in a few years that someone mixed up a – with + in their equations…

Glenn

Am i missing something? Aren’t photons already going as fast as they can?

fakeyfakefake

These were given some mass, so may have been going as slow as 99.8 to 99.9% of light speed.

Of course, the increase in velocity they measured seems likely to have been balanced by a decrease in the paired-photon’s imbued mass. Meaning, as the particles lost/shared their positive and negative masses to each other, their velocity returned to that of a massless particle.

Also, they were not able to measure “acceleration” quite as neatly as the diagram in this article suggested – it was derived from implied forces measured from linear scattering experiments. Man, I wish I could afford the thousands of dollars in subscription fees the guys at extremetech must get to play with!

adamrussell

If Im understanding this article, they are saying that the interference from fiber 2 causes the light in fiber 1 to behave as if it has “negative mass” which means that the index of refraction of the glass in fiber 1 would cause the light to increase in speed instead of slow down.

If thats what they are saying this is a theoretic breakthrough above and beyond even cold fusion. But then Im obviously guessing. The article could be clearer.

bertgoz

There is no way this could translate to electrons as it will violate the first law of thermodynamics. Basically increasing the speed of the electrons for free would increase the mobility and therefore the current and energy generated (V*I) . In any case, electrons do have a rest mass (although the electron quasiparticle can have a negative mass…)

leadfoot

can this help me beat a photo radar ticket?

Teodor Jovanovski

If this works, it’s a win.
Lately, a lot of things ( despite the fact this post is 10 moths old ) seem real.

Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Copyright 1996-2015 Ziff Davis, LLC.PCMag Digital Group All Rights Reserved. ExtremeTech is a registered trademark of Ziff Davis, LLC. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis, LLC. is prohibited.