“Where Did the Towers Go; The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 911,” Dr Judy Wood

“Figure 13. The building turns to powder. Material is being launched upward and outward. The whitish material arcs over and begins to fall downward while the southern portion (away from the camera) appears to shoot straight up.”

“The ‘Criminalization of the State’, is when war criminals legitimately occupy positions of authority, which enable them to decide ‘who are the criminals’, when in fact they are the criminals.”

“A terrorist attack on American soil of the size and nature of September 11, would lead –according to former CENTCOM Commander, General Tommy Franks– to the downfall of democracy in America.”

“In an interview last December, which was barely mentioned in the US media, General Franks outlined with cynical accuracy a scenario, which would result in the suspension of the Constitution and the installation of military rule in America: ‘a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event [will occur] somewhere in the Western world – it may be in the United States of America – that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event.’ “ (Tommy Franks Interview, Cigar Aficionado, December 2003)

“Franks was alluding to a so-called ‘Pearl Harbor type event’ which would be used to galvanise US public opinion in support of a military government and police state. The ‘terrorist massive casualty-producing event’ is presented by General Franks as a crucial political turning point. The resulting crisis and social turmoil is intended to facilitate a major shift in US political, social and institutional structures.”

“It is important to understand that General Franks was not giving a personal opinion on this issue. His statement very much reflects the dominant viewpoint both in the Pentagon and the Homeland Security department as to how events might unfold in the case of a national emergency.”

“The statement comes from a man who has been actively involved in military and intelligence planning at the highest levels. In other words, the ‘militarisation of our country’ is an ongoing operational assumption. It is part of the broader ‘Washington consensus’. It identifies the Bush administration’s ‘roadmap’ of war and Homeland defense.”

“The ‘war on terrorism’ which constitutes the cornerstone of Bush’s national security doctrine, provides the required justification for repealing the Rule of Law, ultimately with a view to ‘preserving civil liberties’. In the words of David Rockefeller: ‘We are on the verge of global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.’” (David Rockefeller, Statement to the United Nations Business Council, 1994)

“A similar statement, which no doubt reflects a consensus within the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), was made by former National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, The Grand Chessboard: ‘As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.’”

“Similarly, the NeoCons’ Project for the New American Century (PNAC), published in September 2000, barely a few months before George W. Bush’s accession to the White House, called for: ‘some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.’” (See http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NAC304A.html)

“What is terrifying in these assertions is that they emanate from the architects of US foreign policy. In other words, America’s leaders in Washington and Wall Street firmly believe in the righteousness of war and authoritarian forms of government as a means to ‘safeguarding democratic values’”.

“The repeal of democracy is portrayed as a means to providing ‘domestic security’ and upholding civil liberties. Truth is falsehood and falsehood is truth. Realities are turned upside down. Acts of war are heralded as ‘humanitarian interventions’ geared towards upholding democracy. Military occupation and the killing of civilians are presented as ‘peace-keeping operations.’”

“This dominant viewpoint is also shared by the mainstream media, which constitutes the cornerstone of the propaganda and disinformation campaign. Any attempt by antiwar critics to reveal the lies underlying these statements is defined as a ‘criminal act’”.

“In other words, the ‘Criminalization of the State’, is when war criminals, supported by Wall Street, the ‘big five’ defense contractors and the Texas oil giants, legitimately occupy positions of authority, which enable them to decide ‘who are the criminals’, when in fact they are the criminals.”