Biological imaging technique reveals secrets of dendrite growth

6 August 2018

This is a schematic illustration of a Li-Li symmetric cell under SRS imaging. Image: Qian Cheng/Columbia Engineering.

Lithium (Li) metal batteries hold tremendous promise for next-generation energy storage because lithium metal negative electrodes have 10 times more theoretical specific capacity than the graphite electrodes used in commercial Li-ion batteries. Lithium metal also has the most negative electrode potential among materials for lithium batteries, making it a perfect negative electrode.

Unfortunately, lithium is one of the most difficult materials to manipulate, due to its internal dendrite growth mechanism. This highly complex process is still not fully understood and can cause Li-ion batteries to occasionally short circuit, catch fire or even explode.

Researchers know that the growth of dendrites, which are needle-like lithium whiskers that form internally in battery electrodes, is affected by how ions move in the electrolyte. But they do not understand how ion transport and inhomogeneous ionic concentration affect the morphology of lithium deposition. Imaging ion transport in a transparent electrolyte has proved highly challenging, and current techniques have been unable to capture low ionic concentrations and ultrafast electrolyte dynamics.

Now, in a paper in Nature Communications, researchers at Columbia University report using Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS) microscopy, a technique widely used in biomedical studies, to explore the mechanism behind dendrite growth in lithium batteries. In so doing, they have become the first team of material scientists to directly observe ion transport in electrolytes.

Their study revealed a lithium deposition process that occurs in three stages: no depletion, a partial depletion (a previously unknown stage) and full depletion of lithium ions. The researchers also found a feedback mechanism between lithium dendrite growth and heterogeneity of the local ionic concentration that can be suppressed by an artificial solid electrolyte interphase in the second and third stages.

"Using Stimulated Raman Scattering microscopy, which is fast enough to catch the quickly changing environment inside the electrolyte, we've been able to figure out not only why lithium dendrites form but also how to inhibit their growth," says Yuan Yang, co- author of the study and assistant professor of materials science and engineering in the Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics at Columbia Engineering. "Our results show that ion transport and inhomogeneous ionic concentration is critical to the formation of lithium dendrites on the lithium surface. The capability to visualize ion movement will help us improve the performance of all kinds of electrochemical devices – not just batteries, but also fuel cells and sensors."

For this study, Yang collaborated with Wei Min, professor of chemistry at Columbia University and the study's co-author. Ten years ago, Min developed SRS with colleagues as a tool to map chemical bonds in biological samples. Yang learned about the technique from Min's website and realized that SRS might be a valuable tool in his battery research.

"SRS is three to six orders of magnitude faster than conventional spontaneous Raman microscopy," Yang noted. "With SRS, we can acquire a 3D image of resolution of 300nm in 10 seconds with a chemical resolution of around 10mM, thus making it possible to image ion transport and distribution."

The study revealed that there are three dynamic stages in the Li deposition process.

A slow and relatively uniform deposition of moss-like Li when ionic concentration is well above 0.

A mixed growth of mossy Li and dendrites; at this stage, Li cation depletion partially occurs near the electrode and lithium dendrite protrusions start to appear.

Dendrite growth after full depletion. When the surface ions are fully depleted, the lithium deposition will be dominated by ‘dendrite growth’.

Stage 2 is a critical transitional point at which the heterogeneous Li cation depletion on the Li surface induces the lithium deposition to change from ‘mossy lithium mode’ to ‘dendrite lithium mode’. At this stage, two regions begin to appear: a dendrite region where lithium starts to deposit dendrites at a faster and faster rate, and a non-dendrite region where the lithium deposition slows down and even stops. These results are also consistent with predictions made from simulations carried out by Long-Qing Chen, professor of materials science and engineering at Pennsylvania State University, and his PhD student Zhe Liu.

"The clever use of Stimulated Raman Scattering microscopy to visualize the electrolyte concentration within an operating electrode is a real breakthrough in the imaging of electrochemical systems," says Martin Bazant, professor of chemical engineering and mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who was not involved in the study. "In the case of lithium electrodeposition, the link between local salt depletion and dendritic growth was directly observed for the first time, with important implications for the design of safe rechargeable metal batteries."

Following up on their observations, the Columbia team then developed a method to inhibit dendrite growth by homogenizing the ionic concentration on the lithium surface for stages 2 and 3.

"When we made the surface ion distribution uniform and mitigated the ionic heterogeneity by depositing an artificial solid electrolyte interface, we were able to suppress the dendrite formation," explains the study's lead author Qian Cheng, a postdoctoral researcher in Yang's lab. "This gives us a strategy to suppress dendrite growth and move on to improving the energy density of current batteries while developing next-generation energy storage."

Min is very pleased that his SRS technique has become such a powerful tool for the materials and energy fields. "Without SRS microscopy, we would not have been able to see and validate such a clear correlation between the Li+ concentration and dendrite growth," he says. "We are excited that more people in materials science will learn about this tool. Who knows what we will see next?"

This story is adapted from material from Columbia Engineering, with editorial changes made by Materials Today. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of Elsevier. Link to original source.

About Materials Today

Materials Today is a community dedicated to the creation and sharing of materials science knowledge and experience. Supported by Elsevier, we publish high impact peer-reviewed journals, organize academic conferences, broadcast educational webinars and so much more.

Contact Us

We want to hear from you. We’re here to support the creation and sharing of information: if there’s something we aren’t doing, or something we could do better, let us know. We grow through your comments and ideas.