According to Ashley Emswell Hungate, director of communications for the Indiana State Personnel Department, Heimbach was employed bythe state of Indiana’s Department of Child Services from January 11 to January 28, 2016. He was trainingto become a full-time family case manager before being abruptly fired for “his behavior at work.”

“His behavior in training was disruptive of theworkplace, incompatible with public service, and not protected speech,” Ms. Hungate stated. “Forexample, what I’ve been told is that, while in training, his response to a question suggested violence against a client.”

Thus far, claims that Heimbach was disruptive and incompatible for public service appear to be unsubstantiated. However, this much is clear:After Heimbach’s political views and history of public activism were brought to the attention of the state of Indiana, he was immediately fired.

AMERICAN FREE PRESS spoke directly with Heimbach to get the full story on both controversies.

“To my knowledge, I did not violate any policies and I had passed all training activities, including my diversity training, up until the day I was fired,”Heimbach told AFP. “The department has a policy, however, that states ‘No employee will be appointedto, demoted, or dismissed from any position, or in any way be favored or discriminated against with respect to employment because of hisor her political opinions or affiliations.’ It appears to me that the department was violating its own policies.”

In a blog post describing his brief career with the Indiana Department of Child Services, Heimbach noted:

Having a strong academic record at a reputableuniversity and a solid work record, I’m a Department of Child Services hiring manager’sworst nightmare. On paper, I’m the perfect candidate for the job. I aced the interview, because Icare deeply about child poverty issues, building strong families, and investing in the folks who need it the most. I pass the “background check”with flying colors, because I’ve never stolen a stick of gum or been caught jaywalking. But Ihave something in my past which doesn’t get flagged on the formal background checks because it’s not technically illegal; pro-white political beliefs.

Heimbach’s firing demonstrates once again the increasingly blatant assault on the First Amendment and free speech in the United States.

This reporter was forced out of his positionwith a local municipal government in southern California late last year after officials were madeaware of his political views and independent journalistic activities. Dr. James Tracy was also recently fired from his position at Florida Atlantic University, largely due to his scholarly research into the alleged Sandy Hook massacre.

Holding controversial political views and engaging in scholarly research is apparently a crime in modern America.

“The current political and social climate is onein which we are entering a war on the First Amendment, freedom of association, and otherbasic civil liberties,” Heimbach explained to AFP. “A civil rights slippery slope is clearly in front ofus. If the state of Indiana can fire people for ‘farright’ politics, where does it end? If you are a Christian, who supports traditional marriage, willyou be labeled a ‘hater’ and lose your job? There is a state-sponsored war on the First Amendment in our nation from the federal government on down.”

Following Heimbach’s firing, which was reported on by the mainstream mass media, the young activist and nationalist found himself in yetanother controversy. While attending a Trump rally in Louisville, Heimbach was accused ofshoving and assaulting a disruptive protester affiliated with the BLM movement. Trump rallies are regularly disrupted and subject to organized protests by radical leftists.

Heimbach provided the details and context to give readers a much more balanced and objective view of what transpired at the rally.

“Members of local far-left groups and the BlackLives Matter movement came to the Trump rally I attended with the specific intention to—in theirown words—‘disrupt’ the event,” Heimbach told AFP. “There was a protest going on outside theycould easily have participated in if they were so inclined, but instead they came into the Trump rally specifically to be confrontational and combative.Within five minutes of the protesters’ arrival in the hall, I saw BLM protesters shove anelderly man and woman and then begin cursing. This situation continued in multiple locations where radical leftists were disruptive, vulgar, and in some cases outright violent with Trump supporters.”

Heimbach and other Trump supporters simplyhelped remove the disruptive and potentially violent protesters from the rally, he said.

At virtually every Trump rally, the same exactscenario plays out: Disruptive protesters interrupt the populist presidential candidate, and supportersand security officials respond by physically removing the individuals responsible. After reviewing the video of the incident, which is available online, it is clear that Heimbach and others at therally merely facilitated the removal of the disruptive and uncouth protesters.

The radical protesters disrupting Trump events“continue to think they have a right to disrupt and destroy, and then when they are removed fromevents, they cry ‘racism’ and play the victim,” Heimbach noted.

Required fields are marked with an *. Your email address will not be published. All comments containing hyperlinks will be held in moderation until they are formatted properly, but will be posted. All comments containing obscenities will be amended and posted, unless they are too obscene and nonsensical, in which case they will be deleted.