*'''Nomination''' and '''For'''. Funny, article, plenty of people working on it, and the pictures add to the effect quite nicely. I don't know. You either hate this page, or you think it's a riot. --[[User:Llama-Llover|The Llama Llover]]

*'''Nomination''' and '''For'''. Funny, article, plenty of people working on it, and the pictures add to the effect quite nicely. I don't know. You either hate this page, or you think it's a riot. --[[User:Llama-Llover|The Llama Llover]]

*'''Against'''. It's not good enough for a front-page article. ''Like, this one time, we were out at this roller rink. He went up to this girl and was like, "Hey, do you wanna go get a burger or something?" And she said yes, but then she totally blew him off. Later, I asked her why she did it and she said it was because he looked like shit. It's true. That's what Martin Van Buren looks like.'' That is frikkin' ''[[colloquial]]''. --{{User:Thematrixeatsyou/sig}} 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against'''. It's not good enough for a front-page article. ''Like, this one time, we were out at this roller rink. He went up to this girl and was like, "Hey, do you wanna go get a burger or something?" And she said yes, but then she totally blew him off. Later, I asked her why she did it and she said it was because he looked like shit. It's true. That's what Martin Van Buren looks like.'' That is frikkin' ''[[colloquial]]''. --{{User:Thematrixeatsyou/sig}} 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

*This is not retarded. All you have to do is read it the whole way through (the WHOLE WAY THROUGH, mind you), and then after you've read the last line, read it all again. Then suddenly it's the funniest thing you've ever read. I think. '''For'''. {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

*This is not retarded. All you have to do is read it the whole way through (the WHOLE WAY THROUGH, mind you), and then after you've read the last line, read it all again. Then suddenly it's the funniest thing you've ever read. I think. '''For'''. {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''' I remember when this was written. It also gives me flashbacks of some train driver at the station in Boston near the airport asking me something in an accent so thick that I didn't comprehend I was being talked to until he tried again more slowly after I realized it was something sort of like English, but not really. {{User:Dawg/sig}} 04:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''' I remember when this was written. It also gives me flashbacks of some train driver at the station in Boston near the airport asking me something in an accent so thick that I didn't comprehend I was being talked to until he tried again more slowly after I realized it was something sort of like English, but not really. {{User:Dawg/sig}} 04:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against''' for yet a second time (presumably for the same reasons). --{{User:DWIII/sig}} 18:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against''' for yet a second time (presumably for the same reasons). --{{User:DWIII/sig}} 18:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

:*'''comment''' am I to undestand the [[User:Mhaille|He]] is not the polite gentleman he pretends to be but rather a sort of a....[[The Wicker Man|Wicker Man]]? --{{User:Mordillo/sig}} 13:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

:*'''comment''' am I to undestand the [[User:Mhaille|He]] is not the polite gentleman he pretends to be but rather a sort of a....[[The Wicker Man|Wicker Man]]? --{{User:Mordillo/sig}} 13:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Nom and for'''. Not only is this the best-written article on the site, but it's also quite funny. Also, maybe if we feature this, some people will read it.--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 21:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Nom and for'''. Not only is this the best-written article on the site, but it's also quite funny. Also, maybe if we feature this, some people will read it.--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 21:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''' because people need to read it and they don't. --{{User:Jocke Pirat/Sig}} 22:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''' because people need to read it and they don't. --{{User:Jocke Pirat/Sig}} 22:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

−

*'''For,''' as long as featuring something in the Uncyclopedia namespace is allowed. {{User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig}} 22:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

+

*'''For,''' as long as featuring something in the Uncyclopedia namespace is allowed. {{User:S:u:<rwcl-L-mH/Ff~=EUR*cssD-AEO/C/sig}} 22:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''För''' My first vote in days and its for this piece of crap? No really, it's great. --{{User:DiZ/sig}} 18:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

+

*'''Fo:r''' My first vote in days and its for this piece of crap? No really, it's great. --{{User:DiZ/sig}} 18:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against'''. I tried to laugh at this but didn't succeed. Maybe it's just not outrageously funny enough. Maybe I just need to go and take up somking bong. Anyway, I will have a look at this again and see if it's really feature-worthy. -- {{User:Col.swordman/sig}} 07:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against'''. I tried to laugh at this but didn't succeed. Maybe it's just not outrageously funny enough. Maybe I just need to go and take up somking bong. Anyway, I will have a look at this again and see if it's really feature-worthy. -- {{User:Col.swordman/sig}} 07:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

*Missed this one too.....still think you should have the Munch Bunch! -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}} 17:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

*Missed this one too.....still think you should have the Munch Bunch! -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}} 17:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''', and I quote: "Edvard spent his later years looking forward to death with sheer terror while curled up in a corner of his room, under a sheet." --[[User:Donut|Donut]] <small>[[User_talk:Donut|Buy one!]]|[[Special:Contributions/Donut|Get one Free!]]|[[F@H]]|[[Order_of_Uncyclopedia#Member_.28MUN.29|MUN]]</small> 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''', and I quote: "Edvard spent his later years looking forward to death with sheer terror while curled up in a corner of his room, under a sheet." --[[User:Donut|Donut]] <small>[[User_talk:Donut|Buy one!]]|[[Special:Contributions/Donut|Get one Free!]]|[[F@H]]|[[Order_of_Uncyclopedia#Member_.28MUN.29|MUN]]</small> 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

*<s>'''For.''' Took me a while to decide, because it was kinda confusing the first time I read it, but after re-reading, its funny and the images are good. --'''[[User:Sir Cornbread| <font color=black>Sir Cornbread</font><small><font color=gold> The Great</font></small>]]''' [[Image:Icons-flag-us.png|22px|America...Fuck Yeah!!!!]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Sir Cornbread|<font color=silver>[SHOUT]</font>]] [[Order of Uncyclopedia|<font color=green>[MUN]</font>]] [[Fisher Price: A Retrospective|<font color=red>[GET THIS FEATURED!]</font>]]</small> 05:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)</s>

*<s>'''For.''' Took me a while to decide, because it was kinda confusing the first time I read it, but after re-reading, its funny and the images are good. --'''[[User:Sir Cornbread| <font color=black>Sir Cornbread</font><small><font color=gold> The Great</font></small>]]''' [[Image:Icons-flag-us.png|22px|America...Fuck Yeah!!!!]]&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Sir Cornbread|<font color=silver>[SHOUT]</font>]] [[Order of Uncyclopedia|<font color=green>[MUN]</font>]] [[Fisher Price: A Retrospective|<font color=red>[GET THIS FEATURED!]</font>]]</small> 05:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)</s>

*'''For''', because I'm one of the poor bastards that bought a Pentium Pro and I'm still holding a grudge. [[User:Modusoperandi|Modusoperandi]] 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''', because I'm one of the poor bastards that bought a Pentium Pro and I'm still holding a grudge. [[User:Modusoperandi|Modusoperandi]] 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

*'''For''' because it hasn't gotten a single Against yet, and because it needs to be featured eventually. {{User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ/sig}} 20:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

+

*'''For''' because it hasn't gotten a single Against yet, and because it needs to be featured eventually. {{User:S:u:<rwcl-L-mH/Ff~=EUR*cssD-AEO/C/sig}} 20:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Weak For''' It doesn't have the same comedic punch as some of the other stuff I've read, but it has some nice jokes. I especially like the "Four Least Efforts." {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 20:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Weak For''' It doesn't have the same comedic punch as some of the other stuff I've read, but it has some nice jokes. I especially like the "Four Least Efforts." {{User:Wehpudicabok/sig}} 20:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against.''' Why did I vote for this originally? Maybe to get rid of Swordman...I do like the pics, but it didnt make me laugh once. --{{User:Sir Cornbread/sig}} 22:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

*'''Against.''' Why did I vote for this originally? Maybe to get rid of Swordman...I do like the pics, but it didnt make me laugh once. --{{User:Sir Cornbread/sig}} 22:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

Nomination and For. Funny, article, plenty of people working on it, and the pictures add to the effect quite nicely. I don't know. You either hate this page, or you think it's a riot. --The Llama Llover

Against. It's not good enough for a front-page article. Like, this one time, we were out at this roller rink. He went up to this girl and was like, "Hey, do you wanna go get a burger or something?" And she said yes, but then she totally blew him off. Later, I asked her why she did it and she said it was because he looked like shit. It's true. That's what Martin Van Buren looks like. That is frikkin' colloquial. --thematrixeætsyou, the ^_^ (talk) (flames) 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

For - wasn't this nominated before? This is really good - David Gerard 09:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. Maybe I am really pushing for this, but I would really like to see the article featured. It was the work of 50+ individuals over a period of one year, and 1000+ hours were spent with all blood, sweat and tears... Meh, what the heck! Just sit down and enjoy the article, and don't forget to vote! -- The Colonel(talk) 14:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

This is not retarded. All you have to do is read it the whole way through (the WHOLE WAY THROUGH, mind you), and then after you've read the last line, read it all again. Then suddenly it's the funniest thing you've ever read. I think. For. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

For I remember when this was written. It also gives me flashbacks of some train driver at the station in Boston near the airport asking me something in an accent so thick that I didn't comprehend I was being talked to until he tried again more slowly after I realized it was something sort of like English, but not really. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 04:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Against for yet a second time (presumably for the same reasons). --DW III 18:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

For. I like how it refuses to consider any constructive use for the tool.--Procopius 12:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

"The hammer's scientific name is Hammerius hitticus, which is obviously a bland and misguided attempt to write something hammer-related in a vaguely Latinate manner." How could you not vote for? User:Wehpudicabok/sig 19:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For Yet another masterpiece by the master of British film, Sir Mhaille. It got everything needed for a smash hit - sex, violence, scots, Christopher Lee and killer bees. In fact, I wish to god I'd seen this version and not the actual one...--Brigadier Sir MordilloGUNUotYWotMFPUotMAotMMI3AnotMVFH+S 09:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

For. I'm voting for this now before he has a chance to hassle me on IRC. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

For Because of brilliant lines like "Erik Estrada is an interstellar Cherzgon warrior who was aborted by his mother during the third week of pregnancy." Man, we really need more humor like that on Uncyc. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 01:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Against. It's actually quite funny and well-written, but does a policy count as an article?--Procopius 02:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

For, because it starts with an Oscar quote, has a Chuck roundhouse pic, uses the word "gay" three times in one sentence, and escalates weasels down Australia's pants. --User:Falcotron/sig 00:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

For, all the IP articles that weren't started because of reading HTBANJS. --SonicChaoBabbel!Contribs 00:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

For. It may not be as funny/witty/crap as the other articles we feature, but this is certainly one of our best pieces of work, and as I recall VFH is for our best work, not funniest. TheFreed MindSutoth IndartheBlack Mage[MUN][YvJP] 07:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

For. I had only skim-read it before, because I know I'm funny (my mother tells me so). I didn't realise how hilarious it is. It's one of the best things on the site. 15Mickey20 20:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

For. It fully actualizes its potential as my senses act upon it and create the image of Philosophy in my mind. But then, what do we really know?--Procopius 15:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

For. I agree with Procopius.-- 15:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

To vote For, or not to vote For? That is the question. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Still, I'd love to see mention Plato's treatise on pederasty from The Disgorgias, entitled "Fuck You, Socrates." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

For, because I actually had a funny philosophy teacher. --User:Falcotron/sig 01:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Self-nom and for, because my rabbi and former Hitler Youth leader says the truth must come out about the Protocols, even though They will never let me work in Hollywood again for this. --User:Falcotron/sig 22:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Weak for. The text is fine, but as InfiniteMonkey said, the pictures (with the exception of the Mordillo one) could use some work. The Lieberman one seemed like a non-sequitor to me.--Procopius 12:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Weak for, for the same reason as Procopius and unfortunately I've been a bit short on time to try and help. The writing is top-notch, though. Have you tried Image Request? -- Imrealized...hmm? 06:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

For. Although I would like to see the opposite version of this article. Sometimes accusations of "self-hating-jewishness" are ridiculously true and funny.---Asteroid B612(aka Rataube) - Ñ 20:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Against.Just 'cause something does not translate into any official language DOES NOT MAKE IT FUNNY. I mean, easy on the jibberish, ya mean? GRUNG! -Unsigned. --SirCHolla | CUN 20:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Thanks for the vote. It's true, (as Falcotron noted as well) it's short. I think I ran out of ideas. Either that, or historiography is the bitch child of comedy. :)--Procopius 21:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. A great one from Mordillo. Possibly the most abusive and erudite HowTo. And it's got this line: The proper way to pronounce this letter is take a nut and shove it down your throat as far down as possible and then observe the sounds you make as you try to cough it out. Got it? There is your Chet.--Procopius 23:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

For. It's not Mordillo's best work, but that doesn't mean it's not hilarious. P.S., Mordillo, can I have a picture of you for the Self-hating Jew article? --User:Falcotron/sig 00:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Strong For. I already know Hebrew, which made this article even more funny! Bravo to the creator!! (besides, I even helped out with some modifications) --User:Llama-Llover

For. I don't know a lick of Hebrew, but after reading this I'll act like I do. Nice addition of sound files, too. -- Imrealized...hmm? 06:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Strong For. I love this article. It pokes fun at the native English speakers (namely, me) and the picture at the end with Windows in Hebrew was hilarious. --User:Armodeus

Against While I like this article and appreciate the effort and humour involved, it's just a bit too angsty for my tastes and certainly not feature-quality, sadly. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 03:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

For, even though these "tough turkeys" Hindleyite speaks of intrigue me. I'll take two of 'em so I can stage fights in my backyard. Do you take PayPal? -- Imrealized...hmm? 04:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

If For no other reason than the tremendous amount of time spent on this. Hard to put together. --SirCHolla | CUN 04:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Against. It's too much of an in-joke. InfiniteMonkey 09:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment as I've said before, I don't see it as all that in-jokey. When it comes down to it, it's Pinafore with color commentary from G&S. The poster-pic and the Potato are incidental to the story.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

For Give me hope, and what I lack in education and polite accomplishments, that I will endeavour to acquire. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 08:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

weak against. I could tell it was funny, but only after reading wikipedia and learning what the hell it was satirising. I'll take this back if I learn that I'm the only one here who has never heard of HMS Pinnafore.--Gubby 20:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

For. A wide variety of humor without ever becoming random and stupid. I mean, it uses "set us up the bomb" and is nevertheless funny. That's a rare thing, to be treasured. Plus, other than a small part of the US (and the entire world outside the US, of course), everyone calls it "Mac & Cheese" and has no idea what "Kraft Dinner" is--which just makes it funnier. --Falcotron 21:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

For -- Funny, but could use some minor touch-ups. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 00:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Weak against. Tough for me, because I'm a fan of Shandon'swork, and I genuinely like the ending of this piece. If there was more detail about the horse's career, I'd swing the other way.--Procopius 14:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Self-nomination. OK, as far as Swiss psychiatrists go, everyone knows Jung. But Hermann Rorschach deserves a bit of recognition. Plus, I did a great deal of field research on this one. -- Imrealized...hmm? 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Self-Nom and For. Well, it didnt win the PLS, but I still think its feature-quality, and hope you all do too. I thank RadX and Modusoperandi for the lovely pics. --SirCHolla | CUN 03:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Against. I tried to laugh at this but didn't succeed. Maybe it's just not outrageously funny enough. Maybe I just need to go and take up somking bong. Anyway, I will have a look at this again and see if it's really feature-worthy. -- The Colonel(talk) 07:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Missed this one too.....still think you should have the Munch Bunch! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

For, and I quote: "Edvard spent his later years looking forward to death with sheer terror while curled up in a corner of his room, under a sheet." --DonutBuy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Self Nomination - I have worked on it for some days and it's time for it now to face the final test. (I have removed most of the comments I posted here. See discussion page for more details.)-- The Colonel(talk) 12:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

For. Cleverly done. This is why I own a Compaq. Wait a minute . . .--Procopius 12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

For. This is a sympathy vote for a nice try. Seriously, WTF is this (see [1])? Go to Hades? That's some funny shit there Swordman. So is this article. I've no sympathy at all, actually. -- Imrealized...hmm? 05:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

For because it hasn't gotten a single Against yet, and because it needs to be featured eventually. {{User:S:u:<rwcl-L-mH/Ff~=EUR*cssD-AEO/C/sig}} 20:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Weak For It doesn't have the same comedic punch as some of the other stuff I've read, but it has some nice jokes. I especially like the "Four Least Efforts." User:Wehpudicabok/sig 20:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Against. Why did I vote for this originally? Maybe to get rid of Swordman...I do like the pics, but it didnt make me laugh once. --SirCHolla | CUN 22:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

For. Hey, I worked hard on it! -- The Colonel(talk) 14:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Against. Too factual. Not Australian. Black text on a white background. Innovative, however, in managing to stretch the idea of unfunny into totally new and incoherent directions. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy(Bleat) 05:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)