Margites to our comedies. When tragedy and
comedy came to light, poets were drawn by their natural bent towards one or the
other. Some became writers of comedies instead of lampoons, the others produced
tragedies instead of epics; the reason being that the former is in each case a
higher kind of art and has greater value.To consider
whether tragedy is fully developed by now in all its various species or not, and to
criticize it both in itself and in relation to the stage, that is another question.
At any rate it originated in
improvisation—both tragedy itself and comedy. The one came from the
preludeBefore the chorus began （or in
pauses between their songs） the leader of the performance would
improvise some appropriate tale or state the theme which they were to elaborate.
Thus he was called ὁ ἐξάρχων or "the
starter," and became in time the first "actor." to the dithyramb and the
other from the prelude to the phallic songs which still survive as institutions in
many cities. Tragedy then gradually
evolved as men developed each element that came to light and after going through
many changes, it stopped when it had found its own natural form. Thus it was Aeschylus who first raised the number of
the actors from one to two. He also curtailed the chorus and gave the dialogue the
leading part. Three actors and scene-painting Sophocles introduced. Then as to magnitude.Being a development of the Satyr play,A Satyr play was an interlude performed by a troupe
of actors dressed as the goat-like followers of Dionysus. Hence τραγῳδία, "goat-song." Aristotle seems so clear
about this that he does not trouble to give a full explanation. But we can see
from this passage that the Satyr plays were short, jocose and in the trochaic
metre which suited their dances, and that in Aristotle's view tragedy was
evolved from these. No example of a primitive Satyr play survives, but we can
make inferences from the later, more sophisticated
Cyclops
of Euripides and the fragments of Sophocles' Ἰχνευταί, The Trackers. We cannot be
certain that Aristotle's theory is historically correct; the balance of evidence
is against it. it was quite late before tragedy rose from short plots and
comic diction to its full dignity, and that the iambic metre was used instead of the
trochaic tetrameter. At first they
used the tetrameter because its poetry suited the Satyrs and was better for dancing,
but when dialogue was introduced, Nature herself discovered the proper metre. The
iambic is indeed the most conversational of the metres, and the proof is that in talking to each other we most often
use iambic lines but very rarely hexameters and only when we rise above the ordinary
pitch of conversation. Then there is
the number of acts. The further embellishmentsMasks, costumes, etc. and the story of their introduction one by one we
may take as told, for it would
probably be a long task to go through them in detail. Comedy, as we have said, is a
representation of inferior people, not indeed in the full sense of the word bad, but
the laughable is a species of the base or ugly."Ugly" was to a Greek an equivalent of "bad." The persons in Comedy are
"inferior" （see chapter 2.）, but have only one of the many
qualities which make up Ugliness or Badness, viz. the quality of being ludicrous
and therefore in some degree contemptible. It consists in some blunder or ugliness
that does not cause pain or disaster, an obvious example being the comic mask which
is ugly and distorted but not painful. The various stages of tragedy and the
originators of each are well known, but comedy remains obscure because it was not at
first treated seriously.