Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Trump’s Tantrums Over Rosenstein Speak Volumes

As the Washington Post and other news media outlets have reported, Der Trumpenführer let loose with a Twitter tantrum directed at Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein that complained as follows:

“I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man
who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt,”

Never mind that Trump himself told the world on national television that he was going to fire James Comey regardless of an advice from Mr. Rosenstein or anyone else. Sadly, it is part and parcel with Trump's constant lying that is believed only by the most brain dead of his core base of evangelical Christians and white supremacists. There's a reason why Trump now has a disapproval rate of 64% based on the latest polling. Unfortunately, as a column in the Washington Post notes, this may be the beginning of even more chaos if Trump fires Rosenstein, something that will only add to grounds for finding obstruction of justice. Trump is proving daily that his is mentally and morally unfit for office. We are rapidly approaching a 2017 version of Watergate. Here are column excerpts:

It’s come to
this, on his 146th day in office: The president, under investigation for
obstruction of justice,attackedhis
own deputy attorney general for orchestrating a “witch hunt” against him.

Sometimes my role as a columnist is to advise readers not to overreact, to
maintain perspective. Today my advice is to buckle up. Brace yourselves.

I’m not sure for what, exactly. President Trump firing Rod J. Rosenstein
or taking moves that would force the deputy attorney general, and perhaps
others, to quit? Firing special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, whose probe has
pushed Trump to thisfrenzied state? Using his pardon power in an
effort to shut down the investigation, on the theory that Mueller would then have
nothing left to probe?Pardoning himself, a move of contested legality
that even Richard Nixon balked at? Facingimpeachmentproceedings,
however unlikely that may be with a Republican-controlled Congress?

That
any of these seem within the realm of possibility is the measure of how
unsettled, and unsettling, this moment is. Actually, that’s an understatement.
This situation is alarming in a way I have never experienced in almost four
decades here.

I
am not alone. “The message the president is sending through his tweets is that
he believes the rule of law doesn’t apply to him and that anyone who thinks
otherwise will be fired,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said in astatement Friday.
“That’s undemocratic on its face and a blatant violation of the president’s
oath of office.”

Trump’s wounds are entirely
self-inflicted. He has seemed determined — frantic, really — to see that the
case against fired national security adviser Michael Flynn is dropped. If you
credit Comey’ssworn accountover
Trump’s news conference denials, Trump demanded Comey’s loyalty; pressed him to
drop the case against Flynn; and eventually fired Comey himself because of his
handling of “this Russia thing.” As Comey might say, no
reasonable prosecutor would fail to investigate in these circumstances.

What Trump derides as a “phony witch hunt” is the legal system working as it should.Attorney General Jeff Sessionsneeded to recuse
himself. Rosenstein needed to name a special counsel. And Mueller needs to
pursue the investigation, impartially and fearlessly, to its logical end.

That Trump now feels the need to attack seasoned prosecutors for simply
doing their jobs speaks volumes — and says nothing reassuring about the lengths
to which Trump, for whom self-preservation has always been the top priority,
might eventually go.

Again, the irony is that with ever lie and insane outburst, Trump is only adding to the momentum of the Russiagate investigation. If Trump colluded with Russia - something I would not put past him - and/or engaged in illegal money laundering schemes with Russians, he has no one to blame but himself. If he is forced from office and/or prosecuted, he will have done it to himself. Another Post article looks at this irony:

While the details aren’t precisely the same, the parallels are many. A
president under a widening investigation for (among other things) possible
obstruction of justice. A special counsel targeted by the president’s ire.
High-ranking officials in the Justice Department unwilling to put loyalty to
the president above their obligations to the country, and losing their jobs
because of it. All that’s left is the dramatic round of firings and
resignations and the headlong rush toward impeachment.

Richard Nixon didn’t have Twitter, but Donald Trump does. And this
morning, he attacked his deputy attorney general, . . . . In addition to everything
else, Trump confirms here the reports from anonymous sources that he is
the target of an obstruction of justice investigation. Glad we cleared that up.

What does this have to do with Watergate? Let’s go back to the Saturday
Night Massacre. In October 1973, Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor
investigating the Watergate scandal, demanded that President Nixon turn over
recordings of his Oval Office conversations. Nixon refused, and tried to
negotiate a deal that Cox rejected. Nixon then ordered the attorney general,
Elliot Richardson, to fire Cox. Richardson refused, and resigned. Nixon then
ordered the deputy attorney general, William Ruckelshaus, to fire Cox.
Ruckelshaus refused, and resigned. Nixon then ordered the next person in the
Justice Department hierarchy, Solicitor General Robert Bork, to fire Cox. Bork
agreed. While it would be 10 more months before Nixon himself resigned, the
Saturday Night Massacre may have been the point where his determination to
obstruct the Watergate investigation became the most clear to everyone in the
country.

We aren’t there
yet, but let’s take a good look at where we are. There is something serious
going on between Trump and Rosenstein, who is overseeing the investigation of
special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. . . . . only Rosenstein has the
authority to fire Mueller. And it’s plain that Trump would like to rid himself
of this meddlesome special counsel; the question is whether he will try.
Multiple reports from inside the White House paint a picture of Trump as
obsessed with the investigation, railing against Mueller and considering
whether to fire him — an act that everyone around Trump knows would be a
political catastrophe (and possibly a legal one as well).

If Rosenstein is
considering recusal, it’s because of his role in the Comey firing — which,
let’s not forget, Trump admitted both on national television and in aconversation
with Russian officials in the Oval Officethat he did out of unhappiness with
the Russia investigation. Rosenstein could become a witness in the obstruction
investigation, which would make it problematic for him to be overseeing
Mueller. The authority would then fall to Brand. Is Trump going to go after her
next? What happens if he orders her to fire Mueller? Would she resign in
protest like Richardson and Ruckelshaus, or follow orders like Bork?

Let’s step back and try to grasp everything that’s going on here. The
president of the United States is waging an inept public relations campaign
against the special counsel’s investigation . . .

[I]t [the Russiagate investigation] seems to
be pushing Trump to particular heights of irrationality. If you were trying to
limit the investigation and its political fallout and not antagonize the
prosecutors, it would be utterly insane to send out these kinds of tweets.
Trump’s staff and lawyers are surely begging him to stop. But they can’t
control him.

In an ordinary
scandal, you have some initial set of misdeeds, and then possibly a coverup
that adds more misdeeds that could themselves be criminal. In the Russia scandal
we could have those two sets of actions, but on top of them we have a paranoid,
infantile president seemingly determined to put himself in ever-greater
political and legal jeopardy. The more we learn about how deep Mueller’s
investigation is reaching, the higher the chances that Trump will, in a moment
of rage, order Mueller to be fired. If you think things are dramatic and absurd
right now, just wait — it’s going to get worse.

What I cannot understand is why anyone sane would have voted for Trump. His entire career and behavior for decades proved beyond question that he was unfit for office.

1 comment:

I think anyone who voted for Trump is deplorable. But as for "all" turning against Nixon, 11 of 17 Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee voted against impeachment (six voted for it, along with all 21 Democrats).

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.