Sort By

This is the place to talk about your favorite topic, to share news, theories, ideas, and to connect with others. The content from your Forum has been converted to Discussions posts, so nothing has been lost.

To learn more about what you can do here, check out http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Discussions

If you're an admin on this community, read more about how you can customize your Discussions and set up guidelines for contributors: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Admin_and_Moderator_Tools_in_Discussions

As of now, i'm scrapping the Rollbacker Request thing, the reason being, i feel the appointment system works better, as the Rolbacker tool, it's really only one tool, the reason most wikis have requests for admin, is the admin tool is a lot of tools, but a request for rollback really wouldn't work, plus there is a very small chance of a user would request for it, plus we have confident and smart enough bureaucrats, that appointing good rollbacks wouldn't be that much of a problem at all.

Hi everyone,A couple users have noticed some confusion over how voting on admin and bcrat requests works. I noticed that there is not writen word as to of how this works!So here's the proposal:We use a system simmaler to that of several other wikis including ESB , "Users will express their vote with either Support, Neutral, or Oppose along with a short sentance explaining their choice.In order for a request to pass, 75% of all votes must be support. "With this system even if only four or less people are active, we get a fair vote. Since this wiki is fairly small I think this system would be perfect. We can adjust the "75%" number down or up if need be.Leave a coment below.use {{Support}}, {{Neutral}}, or {{Oppose}}This will apply to both admin and bcrat requests.

Okay, we currently have 6 administrators, of which 3 are bureaucrats. I'm not including Bravenwolf or Road in those, as they're going to be demoted.My proposal for admins is:Bureaucrats:Tominator777SummerSpongefan20Auron~GuardianAdministrators:Nightmare9188LumoshiRiku KH Support, Neutral, or Oppose this proposal.

Hi all,Since User:Road Runner1 is a closed account we should demote it. However, we need comunity support in order to do this. This account has already been demoted on SBG by staff. Please give your support so we can ask staff to demote this account.

Hello I would like to propose a slight change to the 30 day inactivity rule.The following wIll be added to the rules page: "If an admin announces that they will be inactive, they will obtain the "On Wiki-Break" status. Admins on Wiki-Break status will not be demoted due to inactivity."I think this would be benificial for the whole community. Everybody needs a break sometimes after all!

This is a community discussion for the demotion of Sky The Speedpo, who is known for abusing powers and bullying users. as you know he is globally blocked and should just be stripped of his crats rights. So simply vote yes or no and say why.

This is a community discussion for the demotion of Master Bravenwolf, who is known for abusing powers and bullying users. as you know he is globally blocked and should just be stripped of his crats rights. So simply vote yes or no and say why.

*sighs relaxed* It Feels Good to be back on the Forums Again, To be talking on the Forums outside of of the Usual Stuff the Forums are used for nowadays, To enjoy Chatting here with my Wikia Friends, and the Forums have Many Advantages.

You know, Some users have been Giving me Ideas for this Wiki Already i picked up Some Ideas Myself Including:1.Having More than Neutral support, Strong Support, Weak Support, Neutral leaning teward Support, Neutral leaning teward oppose, Weak Oppose and Strong Opposeif you have more ideas, share them here