>>>>> "Jost" == Jost Boekemeier <jostobfe@calvados.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE> writes:
Jost> Clark McGrew <mcgrew@ale.physics.sunysb.edu> writes:
>> Is it easy to leave the existing gh_ calling sequences along
>> and define the new names for the new (preferred) gh_calls?
Jost> The problem is: in which environment should an expression be
Jost> evaluated? There is no "contains everything" environment
Jost> anymore, altough it is possible to create one.
I think it's important that gh_ not require using the scm_ interface.
Does (or will) gh_ provide some way to get the environment pointers
needed for gh_define, gh_load and gh_eval?
Anyway, I'd rather see the environments merged into guile and have gh_
be unstable for a while than wait.
Cheers,
Clark