हैरी पॉटर Opinion Article

Should the Cursed Child be Make into a Film?

Hi guys, since I had read the book and even written a review of it. So, here are my personal opinions on whether या not it should be make into a film despite that it was meant to be a play.

It Should Not Be A Film

Since the passing of Alan Rickman, it would be difficult to portray him as Professor Snape as a sign of respect to the actor who has passed on yesteryear despite he is only feature in one scene during the play.

It Should Be A Film

Unless if they get the original choice, Tim Roth to play Professor Snape in one scene, I'm sure that the film will be magical like the play. They would use special make-up on the original cast of Hermione, Harry, Ron, Ginny and Draco as adults. I would be looking आगे to see the original casts be part of the film again!

The Wizarding World Revisited

So, do आप want the play to be translated into a film like the पूर्व Harry Potter adaptations? Please टिप्पणी दे and tell me on what do आप think?

5 comments

Yes, I would like to see it. I would not say I love that play very much, but it is extends the HP universe, and it`s nice.
And I always think Alan Rickman is too old for Snape and too balanced psychically. Without belittling his actor's talent, this character just 35-40 age, scrawny, and his nerves have a lot of problems.
I think producers will find an actor Snape`s age and temper, and we will see true traits of this character described in the books.

No, absolutely not. I find the "Cursed Child" a bad joke of J.K. Seriously, some things in this book don't make any sense, or connexion with good old HP. I would like to see a sequel of HP, but npt something this kind... + Alan is gone, Hermione, Harry and Ginny had REALLY changed (as much as other characters...) and it just hurts. I prefer develope HP world with Fantastic Beasts, or any kind of fan-content, but forget this part of canon...