Post by Jim_HigginsMy $0.02 worth. You could use a Timex. Apple watch has no real user thancannot be satisfied by a MUCH cheaper alternative.

nonsense. an apple watch does all sorts of things a timex can't do,*far* more than just tell time.

<http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/baig/2014/08/05/timex-enters-smartwatch-category-no-phone-needed/13597331/>It's as always: Timex Time! Unless you have a Swatch, it's Swiss youknow or something...<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_Group_USA>

And Apple outsells them significantly. So what?

--E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

Post by Jim_HigginsMy $0.02 worth. You could use a Timex. Apple watch has no real user thancannot be satisfied by a MUCH cheaper alternative.

nonsense. an apple watch does all sorts of things a timex can't do,*far* more than just tell time.

<http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/baig/2014/08/05/timex-enters-smartwatch-category-no-phone-needed/13597331/>It's as always: Timex Time! Unless you have a Swatch, it's Swiss youknow or something...<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_Group_USA>

Post by Jim_HigginsMy $0.02 worth. You could use a Timex. Apple watch has no real userthan cannot be satisfied by a MUCH cheaper alternative.

nonsense. an apple watch does all sorts of things a timex can't do,*far* more than just tell time.

<http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/baig/2014/08/05/timex-enters-smartwatch-category-no-phone-needed/13597331/>It's as always: Timex Time! Unless you have a Swatch, it's Swiss youknow or something...<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_Group_USA>