Re: Dynamic groups (was Samba and groups > 16) - Samba

This is a discussion on Re: Dynamic groups (was Samba and groups > 16) - Samba ; Volker Lendecke wrote:
> No, I'm not advocating NT ACLs. They can very quickly become an administrative
> nightmare. For an example of (IMHO) well-chosen ACL semantics I recommend
> looking at AFS.
I agree: I'm a Multician, and the ...