This seems a bit ambiguous, could you clarify? Have they been using it
verbally, or in written form? As I read this now, it suggests more
written stuff is out there that uses just Jabber. Is that correct?
--temas
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:17, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> They've been doing that for a while. Personally I have encouraged all
> concerned (and have followed this recommendation when I write any copy for
> the company) to always use "Jabber, Inc." when referring to the company.
> However, not everyone sees it as I do.
>> Peter
>> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/>> On 21 Mar 2002, Mike Lin wrote:
>> > So everyone take note of this.
> >
> > Here is a blurb from Jabber, Inc.'s Bertelsmann press release:
> >
> > "About Jabber, Inc.
> > Jabber, Inc. is the developer of the world's most widely used open
> > platform for..."
> >
> > And from today's Oracle 9i press release:
> >
> > "About Jabber, Inc.
> > Jabber is the developer of the world's most widely used open flatform
> > for..."
> >
> > Also, from the preceding paragraph:
> >
> > "Jabber is one of the first companies to integrate wireless Instant
> > Messaging using the robust, open APIs of Oracle 9i Application
> > Server..."
> >
> > If this change was intentional, I find it to be a disturbing development
> > in light of our recent discussion, and I ask Jabber, Inc. to (1) explain
> > this apparent change in the use of the Jabber term and (2) again, codify
> > a clear, explicit, and unambiguous policy for the use of the Jabber
> > term.
> >
> > Mike Lin
> > Jabber Council
> > mikelin at mit.edu> >
>> _______________________________________________
> Members mailing list
>Members at jabber.org>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/members