Ed Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 "Robert G. Brown" <rgb at phy.duke.edu> wrote:
>>> And re. the future version of Scientific Linux, there has been
>>> debate on the list re. co-operating with CENTos and essentially
>> If anyone is interested in helping out with (or even just curious
> about) the Fedora packaging process then please see:
>>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers>> which includes a SIG for Scientific and Technical packaging:
>>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech>> Help [in the form of new packagers, new packages, package reviews, bug
> reports, etc...] is always welcome.
Wow... you're right.
First link I click on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingMultipleMPIs
re. using multiple MPIs is empty.
And they only refer to two MPI implementations... they'll have a
caniption fit with a system which has Ethernet, GM and MX drivers,
or a system with SCore (low latency Ethernet MPI), Infinipath and
Quadrics. Pick an MPI. Any MPI.
Mutter... modules... mutter...
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
!DSPAM:462330a322129691080364!