Presentation Title

Presenter Information

Moderator

Rev. Dr. Joseph Mueller, S.J.

Location

University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee

Start Date

28-5-2015 10:00 AM

End Date

28-5-2015 11:00 AM

Abstract

This paper is a philosophical inquiry into the theological concept of revelation. I approach the concept in three stages and I divide the paper into sections accordingly. In §1 I consider what a claim to revelation means and the dilemma such a claim poses for speculative thinking. I am interested in the epistemological quandary encountered by an immanently situated subject in the face of a message that claims a transcendent source, whatever the content of that message might be. In order to illuminate this quandary, I show how it works out within Islam and Christianity. I draw on William E. Shepard for my interpretation of Qur’anic revelation, and I consider this dialectically with reference to Søren Kierkegaard’s essay On the Difference Between an Apostle and a Genius. Ultimately, the dilemma posed by a revelation claim seems unsolvable by purely speculative thinking. Consequently, in §2 I posit the fork in the road, the possibility of either admitting or denying the concept of revelation – and yet, as be argued, it seems that this decision cannot be based on reason, either pro or contra. In §3 I attempt to point in the subjective direction towards which I believe the possibility of divine revelation leads. I am to a large extent influenced by some of the sentiments of Charles Taylor while I primarily engage with the religious epistemology of Paul Moser in which Moser suggests a particular reorientation of the inquirer’s epistemic stance. Although, throughout the paper I draw material from the variety of Christian traditions underlying my own perspective – indeed I problematize the ‘disinterested’ point of view – I imagine that individuals from a great variety of religious traditions would find valuable the praxis, attitude, and mode of religious orientation suggested in this paper.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS

May 28th, 10:00 AMMay 28th, 11:00 AM

On the Concept of Special Revelation

University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee

This paper is a philosophical inquiry into the theological concept of revelation. I approach the concept in three stages and I divide the paper into sections accordingly. In §1 I consider what a claim to revelation means and the dilemma such a claim poses for speculative thinking. I am interested in the epistemological quandary encountered by an immanently situated subject in the face of a message that claims a transcendent source, whatever the content of that message might be. In order to illuminate this quandary, I show how it works out within Islam and Christianity. I draw on William E. Shepard for my interpretation of Qur’anic revelation, and I consider this dialectically with reference to Søren Kierkegaard’s essay On the Difference Between an Apostle and a Genius. Ultimately, the dilemma posed by a revelation claim seems unsolvable by purely speculative thinking. Consequently, in §2 I posit the fork in the road, the possibility of either admitting or denying the concept of revelation – and yet, as be argued, it seems that this decision cannot be based on reason, either pro or contra. In §3 I attempt to point in the subjective direction towards which I believe the possibility of divine revelation leads. I am to a large extent influenced by some of the sentiments of Charles Taylor while I primarily engage with the religious epistemology of Paul Moser in which Moser suggests a particular reorientation of the inquirer’s epistemic stance. Although, throughout the paper I draw material from the variety of Christian traditions underlying my own perspective – indeed I problematize the ‘disinterested’ point of view – I imagine that individuals from a great variety of religious traditions would find valuable the praxis, attitude, and mode of religious orientation suggested in this paper.