With gun violence dominating headlines in Chicago and around the country, Gov. Bruce Rauner on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would have placed new restrictions on firearms sellers in Illinois. The reaction from gun control advocates came fast and furious.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Rauner’s veto was “cruel, it was cold and it was calculated to benefit his own politics at the expense of public safety.” Senate sponsor Don Harmon, D-Oak Park, who worked on the bill for more than a year, called Rauner’s veto “cowardly.” State Sen. Daniel Biss, D-Evanston, who is running for governor, said Rauner’s action lacked “moral conviction.”

With emotions intensifying, the Senate plans to send Rauner additional gun bills on Wednesday — coinciding with the National Student Walkout, a planned demonstration calling for stricter gun laws in the aftermath of the the Feb. 14 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla.

Students around the country leave their classrooms at 10 a.m.; the protest will last 17 minutes, one for each of the victims. Illinois senators will join them — marching out of the Capitol, then returning to vote on bills that would ban bump stocks, increase the waiting period to purchase semi-automatic rifles and limit sales of those weapons to buyers 21 and older.

We support those bills. We support stricter, uniform background checks at the federal level. We support limiting the capacity of magazine clips.

But let’s also take a breath.

The gun shop licensing bill Rauner vetoed was government overreach. Rather than narrowly focused legislation targeting bad actors in the gun-sale business, the bill swept all Illinois sellers — more than 2,000 statewide — into a regulatory environment so onerous it would put some shops out of business. It also created a new layer of government through a Gun Dealer Licensing Board.

You don’t have to take our word for it. More than 20 Democrats in the House and Senate didn’t support the bill, along with more than 50 Republicans. Were they also cruel and cold, lacking moral conviction and cowardly? Or did they recognize government overcorrection when they saw it?

The bill lawmakers sent to Rauner went too far. It would have required gun shop employees to pass background checks and take mandatory state training. Shops would have to install surveillance equipment and alarms. Owners would need a county sheriff’s approval to get a license and would have to open their records to law enforcement, to name just a few of the rules. The designated state oversight agency — the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation — opposed the bill because the agency doesn’t have the resources to enforce it.

Together, the rules constituted more oversight than those of any other state, according to supporters and opponents. And it’s all on top of regulations already in place under federal law. Gun dealers are licensed by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Illinois already imposes more limits on gun ownership than most states — including age restrictions, mandatory waiting periods and a state-issued firearm owner’s identification card, which is granted only after an applicant clears background checks that are stricter than those contained in federal law. Anyone selling a gun must verify that the buyer has a FOID — there is no exemption, as there is under federal law, for private sales at gun shows or elsewhere.

All of this shows that Illinois lawmakers have a track record for passing reasonable gun restrictions.

Rauner’s veto doesn’t mean lawmakers should stomp away. A narrowly tailored bill increasing state oversight of gun dealers might well be warranted. We have seen the statistics on a handful of Illinois dealers who are federally licensed — yet whose weapons, supposedly sold legally, end up disproportionately at crime scenes in Chicago. Those shops deserve more scrutiny. Not everyone.

If gun shop licensing is important to lawmakers in this state, they should return to the negotiating table and find common ground. Downsize the burdensome regulations. Check the emotion that drives gun policy. And send Rauner a bill he can sign.