Why does Alex Smiff get credit for wins when our defense carried this team up until the last two weeks?

Because some really REALLY REALLYREALLY want the investment in Smiff to payoff.

They've hitched their wagon to that horse and there are no other horses available now, not that they would change and admit they were wrong.

So his flat-out inability to throw a ball accurately "most of the time" will always be the O-line's fault. And when he gets it in the areas of a WR, it'll be said to be "good enough".

That being said, our offense (sans JC) is a mess. They are all average at best; from the WRs to the O-line, none of them strike fear into any other team's defensive coordinator when it comes time to plan for "Chiefs week"..

Too bad the D got beat up, they really were 75% (if not more) of this team.

why should I like that you come into this video thread and want to talk but don't want to view the video. I don't see one reason to like what you're doing here. the video is pretty good, with play breakdowns and lots of good commentary -- I thought it was good enough to start a thread. then you come along and talk all kinds of shit while announcing you did not watch the video. ya. that is trolling.

Because some really REALLY REALLYREALLY want the investment in Smiff to payoff.

They've hitched their wagon to that horse and there are no other horses available now, not that they would change and admit they were wrong.

So his flat-out inability to throw a ball accurately "most of the time" will always be the O-line's fault. And when he gets it in the areas of a WR, it'll be said to be "good enough".

That being said, our offense (sans JC) is a mess. They are all average at best; from the WRs to the O-line, none of them strike fear into any other team's defensive coordinator when it comes time to plan for "Chiefs week"..

Too bad the D got beat up, they really were 75% (if not more) of this team.

so you come in here, spew your bullshit and have not one comment about the video. get the **** out.

In those short highlights, it's interesting to see how many of those snaps where Sean Smith played 10 yards off.

they were zone in those plays. and ya -- smith knew he was outmatched in terms of quickness. that is one reason why they lined up zone. I was surprised to see Abdullah miss his cover during the broncos play & then he took a poor angle, missed the tackle on Woodhead during the Boltz play where Smith missed first.

they were zone in those plays. and ya -- smith knew he was outmatched in terms of quickness. that is one reason why they lined up zone. I was surprised to see Abdullah miss his cover during the broncos play & then he took a poor angle, missed the tackle on Woodhead during the Boltz play where Smith missed first.

some in this secondary are not tackling well.

It's one reason I don't like integrating too much zone. Our corners are built for press, and our safeties are too incompetent to play zone. All our safeties would have done the same. At least demps makes a good read now and then.

It's one reason I don't like integrating too much zone. Our corners are built for press, and our safeties are too incompetent to play zone. All our safeties would have done the same. At least demps makes a good read now and then.

It's one reason I don't like integrating too much zone. Our corners are built for press, and our safeties are too incompetent to play zone. All our safeties would have done the same. At least demps makes a good read now and then.

I'm not sure why you think this. the more talented DB's are coveted for 1/1 cover schemes. these athletes have all the tools to play man cover -- quickness, good feet & speed. That's not the case with a lot of our guys.

but moreover, playing man against a team that is running crosses & rub routes the majority of their passing plays is suicide. you have to play a lot of zone and try to disrupt the catch, not the route.

why should I like that you come into this video thread and want to talk but don't want to view the video. I don't see one reason to like what you're doing here. the video is pretty good, with play breakdowns and lots of good commentary -- I thought it was good enough to start a thread. then you come along and talk all kinds of shit while announcing you did not watch the video. ya. that is trolling.

Because I don't always care for links sometimes they **** with my computer so thought to myself "oh scripts from the link I can just quote them to make a comment" Pretty simple that way. Who the **** currs but you? You just didn't like what I had to say. Don't quote things from video in the OP if you don't want people reading the comments to make comments about what they said.

Why make this so complicated? You are only making yourself and me look like assholes. You think I'm trolling lol

I'm not sure why you think this. the more talented DB's are coveted for 1/1 cover schemes. these athletes have all the tools to play man cover -- quickness, good feet & speed. That's not the case with a lot of our guys.

but moreover, playing man against a team that is running crosses & rub routes the majority of their passing plays is suicide. you have to play a lot of zone and try to disrupt the catch, not the route.

Because the best qbs in the game are destroying zone coverages. You won't fool them with a blitz, and if you're playing zone with a free release, qbs don't have their timing disrupted. I would rather get beat by a pick or two than repeatedly let Peyton's receivers get a free release. Given how often they run the pick play, obviously other defenses think the same.

Again, we have to stop acting like there is a magic bullet for beating Peyton except for weather and Peyton beating himself. Zone, blitz, man... He's going to beat you often.

Because the best qbs in the game are destroying zone coverages. You won't fool them with a blitz, and if you're playing zone with a free release, qbs don't have their timing disrupted. I would rather get beat by a pick or two than repeatedly let Peyton's receivers get a free release. Given how often they run the pick play, obviously other defenses think the same.

Again, we have to stop acting like there is a magic bullet for beating Peyton except for weather and Peyton beating himself. Zone, blitz, man... He's going to beat you often.

Well, the 2 teams that have been successful against Denver have mixed up their coverages with both man and zone, so at least Peyton didn't know before coming to the line what to expect every time. Would make more sense to do this now at home where crowd noise can at least give them a bit more trouble calling it at the line and also flashing blitzes or overload even if it's just a fake show and dropping back to give their line assignment confusion and possibly get them mixed up and letting a man go free by accident maybe?