MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C612B9.ABEDB590"
This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer.
------=_NextPart_01C612B9.ABEDB590
Content-Location: file:///C:/45791C99/internetnews_sue_a_spoofer_today.htm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

Spoofing is the practice of forging an e-mail header s=
o that
it appears that the e-mail comes from somewhere other than the actual sourc=
e.
It's a tactic used by spammers to get past black lists and fool recipients =
into
opening unsolicited commercial e-mails.

Phishers also spoof domain=
names,
as well as URLs and legitimate Web sites, to trick people into divulging
passwords, credit card numbers and other personal information.

Individuals and businesses don't have the right to sue
spammers under the CAN-SPAM Act, the national law that became effective Jan=
uary
1, 2004, said Anne Mitchell, president and CEO of the Institute.
"Trademark law gives these individual businesses that right of action =
and
can provide immediate restraining orders and freezing of assets."

ISIPP maintains the Spam Law Enforcement Database and =
the
ISIPP E-mail Accreditation Database, sponsors conferences on e-mail and
consults with government and businesses on public policy and strategies to
fight spam.

Spoofing can cause worlds of woe for the businesses wh=
ose
domain names are used. Their own mail servers may be overloaded with bounced
spam; they may be listed on other companies' and ISPs' block lists, so that
legitimate e-mail from the company is rejected; and it can anger customers =
who
think the company spammed them.

ISI=
PP will
help Internet business owners evaluate whether their domain names could be
trademarked. Mitchell said one criterion is whether the domain is an on=
line
business, rather than a site that provides information about a traditional =
one.
The non-profit will help with the trademark registrant process, and then wa=
lk
the company through the process of suing the spoofer=
span>
for trademark infringement. Services include Internet forensics to help
identify the culprits and attorney referrals.

"We advise that businesses get the domain name
registered as a trademark because it's good business sense, and also it will
allow them to sue people who spoof your domain," Mitchell said.

She said there are several advantages to suing for tra=
demark
infringement, rather than spam. Trademark law is more easily understood, and
there are statutory damages for infringement.

Most important, though, is that trademark laws let a c=
ompany
sue not only the infringer but an entity on whose behalf the infringement w=
as
done. While it can be tough to track down spammers, sellers of the products
they advertise are relatively easy to find.

"You can sue who ever is
sponsoring the spam. And they, in turn, will tell you who the spammer is,&q=
uot;
she said.

"This tactic gives individual business owners bac=
k some
of the redress that CAN-SPAM took away," Mitchell said. "We should
have figured this out a lot sooner."