Swan’s irresponsible budget leaves nanny state untouched, passes the buck to Reserve Bank (Letters published in AFR and The Australian, 12 May)

(The Australian) The 2011-12 budget fails the most important economic test by providing for a deficit of 1.5 per cent of GDP in circumstances where it needed to make room for the expansion in mining investment. It’s irresponsible that policy decisions actually add to the deficit next year.

Also, the claimed $22 billion in gross savings over the four years to 2014-15 includes an unidentified saving of $7 billion in the mysterious category of “Other” and effects very little reduction in expenditures that reduce individuals’ reliance on government.

Moreover, the measures designed to encourage employment omit the vital need to reduce the regulation of employer/employee relations.

In sum, this is an economically irresponsible budget that leaves the nanny state virtually untouched

(Des Moore South Yarra Vic).
====================================================
(AFR) While the Government claims it will return to surplus in 2012-13, the budget fails the most important economic test by providing for a deficit of 1.5 per cent of GDP in 2011-12 in circumstances where it needed to make room for the expansion in mining investment. It is almost unbelievable that the net effect of policy decisions is to actually add to the deficit next year.

Almost as bad is the claim of $22 billion in gross savings over the four years to 2014-15. This includes a saving of $7 billion in the mysterious category of “Other” where no detail is provided of what is being saved and in net terms it amounts to less than 0.5 per cent of GDP over the four years. Examination of the identified gross savings indicates that, while real expenditures are estimated to grow within the 2 per cent pa cap, there will be very little reduction in the type of expenditures that reduce individuals’ reliance on government.

In sum, this is an economically irresponsible budget that leaves the nanny state virtually untouched.

Popular Posts

This alarmist propaganda goes against the real data. Penn State Professor Michael Mann has made similar claims of modern temperatures being the warmest, but such “Hockey Stick” temperature claims have been demolished in the scientific literature.

Opinion by Anthony Cox
I wrote before about the ABC’s bias and the real
cost of the ABC to the Australian community. Since then the Abbott
government has announced reasonable budget cuts but the ABC has sunk further
into its betrayal of its Charter and of the Australian community.
In a recent poll about the farcical China/US deal about
emissions the ABC’s The Drum initially showed this result: 12/11/2014: China and the US have struck a new deal to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Do you think Australia will need to adjust its climate change policies as a result? No 55% Yes 44% Unsure 1%

15205 votes counted
Given the ABC’s Left/Green readership a remarkable result.
However shortly the result
was changed to this: 12/11/2014: China and the US have struck a new deal to limit greenhouse gas
emissions. Do you think Australia will need to adjust its climate change
policies as a result?Yes 76% No 23% Unsure 1% 6001
votes counted
How could you trust an organisation which lies like that and
distorts public …