Calls: I agree, I would not have awarded a penalty either. sometimes there were situations when he whistled, next situation he did not whistle for the same thing. cards ok and the advantage rule, yes, I was upset by it as well

Calls: In 1st half, he denied a clear advantage for Venezuela, giving a hasty card to T. Silva. Then, a good call, when he didn't give a penalty for a possible handball (it wasn't). However, other minor mistakes.

Not much

... to say about this match, where Brazil - same as Argentina on Friday - disappointed their own expectations and could only draw against Venezuela. Not much to say also about Orosco, who did the bare minimum to get things under control and found a game that wasn´t complicated at all.

Key action
There weren´t many controversial actions, but let´s see: the most important one, during the first half, happened inside Venezuelan area. Brazilians claimed a penalty when defender Vizcarrondo stopped the ball dropping to the ground. It didn´t seem to be a handball action, it didn´t even seem he used his arm.

Cards
Orosco showed 4 cards, three of them very correctly, and one that could have been avoided. In one of those actions, he unnecesarily cut an attack by Venezuela whistling to show the yellow. Nothing strange these days.

0.75
4 games, only 3 goals... we are still waiting for the Copa America to start.