The tactics and techniques described herein are dangerous
and cruel. Unfortunately, the only option appears to be to expose
them in such a way that they may be understood by the public at large in
the hope that enough people will begin to see their reality and injustice
and hopefully pressure their representatives in government to enact proactive
legislation limiting their use.

This corroborating MKULTRA document will seem familiar
to many TIs

Signs and Between-the-Lines

'Signs' cover all kinds of clandestine, ambiguous or deniable
semi-communications using everything from suggestive language (like homonyms,
metaphors, euphemisms, etc.) to body language to object placements to visual
imagery that leave the signer insulated from responsibility for the signing.
A sign can be anything from flipping one's cell phone open suggestively
to leaving a dead bird at a person's doorstep - ways of accusing, conveying
threat, pressuring, enhancing paranoia and obliquely referring to possibly
illegally obtained surveillance information about a person (and thereby
show that person that he/she is a slave to surveillance and may always
be), which tend to make the person look paranoid or delusional in reacting
to or interpreting them or which others involved can pretend are products
of paranoia or delusional and which the ignorant masses always assume to
be. They may take the form of so-called ‘mirrors’ within all kinds
of broadcast media – the reflecting of embarrassing information in deniable
ways that may be (and usually are) exaggerated or mixed with provocative
fiction so as to lead a subset of public opinion, accelerated by that person’s
taking ownership of or attempting to refute them. Responding to them
usually only appears to be self-accusation or spontaneous eruptions from
a guilty conscience. One single sign deriving from the surveillance
of a person in a place having a reasonable expectation of privacy can permanently
transform a life into a kind of prison of the mind in terms of the assumption
of being watched. George Orwell apparently had a name for them in
his book 1984 - Duckspeak.

"It is one of those interesting words that have two contradictory
meanings. Applied to an opponent, it is abuse; applied to someone you agree
with, it is praise."

Everyone knows how to do it to some degree (though the
culture surrounding so-called mind control has raised it to an art form)
and the media has long been involved in filling their works with it in
support of MC, often embedding little details about specific targeted individuals
(triggers) that only they (and involved so-called gamers/players) will
tend to recognize. Some people are expert at it and can rattle off
spoken signs in realtime. If you’ve been lead/trained to expect them,
you’re more likely to interpret words as having suggestive meaning beyond
their obvious connotations even when none are intended and that's part
of the permanent effect that gamers are seeking to produce. The delivery
is often so clever that you can’t be sure that you’ve been signed at all.
A relative few people playing that game can make you suspicious of everyone
– it is after all part of the paranoia game of so-called ‘mind control’.

Signs can take a variety of forms. Consider a harasser
who is provided with surveillance information on a target. The target is
in the process of being sleep deprived as part of his/her persecution.
One clever sign that the attacker might deliver in support of that strategy
could be an exaggerated yawn, while passing by that can't be proven as
any kind of covert messaging at all. Gamers are cheaters and cowards
- they have absolutely no scruples about fairness.

Here’s
a clever but fairly obvious one using the old monkey sign, long associated
with targeted persons with its subhuman connotations. Of course, the bar
code implies a monkey in a cage. MC oriented signs are everywhere
in the media these days and the media is regularly assisting in interrogating,
destabilizing and suggesting things about targeted people either generally
or specifically and weaving a kind of media universe of signs here, there
and everywhere. The technique has the disadvantage that the significance
of many signs is missed by many people, which is also a great advantage
in that some of the network’s past evils and harms that have been signed
in earlier decades might cause the whole structure to come crashing down
were those to be provable. The network only wants themselves and
targeted persons to become aware of their prevelance and the non-involved
to only a passing degree, semi-aware of them here and there, but not much
bothered by them. The mode is much like that of the concentration
camps of WW2. Those were never officially announced by the state
as existing at all and continued to be denied by many (even after the fact
of their existence after the war was finally proven). The fact of
their existence just sort of filtered by word of mouth into the population,
as their victims were simultaneously being actively demonized and primed
by Germany's controlled media of the day. In terms of the allowed
or engineered plague epidemic of HIV mentioned elsewhere at this website,
all YOU will ever heard/hear of it openly in the media are the ambiguous
and eminently deniable examples like King's "Here's some Jewish chicken
soup for the great unwashed.", said by the daughter of the father quickly
dying of the plague in King's semi-fictional novel 'The Stand' and within
the other insinuations in that novel. What King was implying by the
quote (or the writer of the screenplay) and the whole premise of the 'super
flu' itself was of course HIV, which would begin to become public knowledge
only a few years after the novel's publication and the release of other
similar signage. See the Dr. Stangelove (pun very much intended by
Kubrick) video study on this website's home page for more on the subject.

“More bars in more places.” to borrow from Cingular’s
recent ad campaign. Cingular could have phrased their slogan in a
different way, but they chose that one precisely for its additional connotations.
What the feds have learned to exploit is that much of the only casually
or uninvolved public has little real interest in the welfare of the people
trapped inside these perpetual concentration camps of the mind and body
and find it easy to disbelieve and disregard them, as long as the subject
doesn't confront them directly, that they find the occasional implied references
to it entertaining instead, and that targets in one way or another are
almost always implicitly demonized. The media is quite ready to playfully
and casually compete amongst themselves within that self-perpetuating arena
and symbolic feeding frenzy and in implicitly building/maintaining the
newspeak dictionary. Today, it's almost mandatory to sign in order
to find success in the media. How many contradictory opinions do
you ever hear or see expressed? Almost none. And that most
people are generally mean, vindictive, unsympathetic and disinterested
by nature (not to mention dumber and more malleable than they like to think
they are), having problems of their own to deal with. And that 'signing'
is in some sense the ultimate conversation stopper and the ultimate barrier
to clear acountable communications. And that it is all rather fun
for the players in the arena who need only deal with it indirectly and
with soft metaphors, symbols and language. The CIA/FBI found the
most ingenius strategy for selling remote thought surveillance and complementary
clandestine harassments. Instead of ever being confronted with the
cold, brutal and sometimes deadly reality face on in the news media and
the courtroom, the public gets fed cute little foxes watching a train set
in their jammies in 'The Fantastic Mr. Fox' (implying the word 'train'
as in 'to train the mind', which is itself somewhat inaccurate in describing
what they actually do). Even I am somewhat seduced by that cute and
entertaining film, although I hate what appear to be its innacuracies in
portraying what seem to be facades of real world people and the game itself.
Although they sometimes come closer in some horror and suspense films (usually
engineered to their own advantage), neither those cooperating artists and
harassers nor the public ever have to be confronted directly (or usually
-
at all) with what is actually being done to their targets and what a lifetime
of mind slavery, social homicide and other tortures actually feel like.
And none of those involved actually admit a thing. Ever. Even
the CIA/FBI are willing to lie in federal court through their FOIA offices
and council, as I have found. And at least some federal judges will
just pat them on the back and buy the lie and rule accordingly, while tossing
around the usual 'delusion' hypothesis by way of justification. Given
implicit or outright permission, fathers lie to their sons about it.
Friends lie to friends about it. And the CIA/FBI lurk in the wings.
That's the future, just like Orwell knowingly prescribed. Justice
is quietly dying. The game is much more fun (at least on the giving
end).

An old professional couple named 'Bob and Delia' (whom
some of you may know) are enduring a most horrible and debilitating series
of attacks that will soon result in Delia's death or complete debilitation.
What does the Ad Council offer up to the public in response? Some
sweet sounding advertisement featuring a young lady named Delia quite excited
about helping herself and her mother get back to school that probably makes
everyone who believes they see some association between the two Delias
(one suffering and dying and the other young, happy and prospering).
Worst of all, the Ad Council (and the signing community) probably have
the right to sue me for attempting to relate to the public that aspect
of the awful, hazy, insane truth. Geico offers up a cute little pig
having himself a great time crying 'Wee wee wee' all the way home to entertain
and lull you to sleep. They will always have fortunes to throw into
their creations. Their targets will always be secretively driven
to poverty and kept devoid of resources and either forced into service
and to love big brother or forced to continue to suffer. They will
always own the public mind. And as Orwell knowingly suggested, these
concentration camps will continue forever.

In another example, the Ad Council offers up an advertisement
about a couple of kids volunteering to take advanced classes on foreign
languages, algebra, etc. theatrically offered to them in the context of
a 'cage of doom' challenge metaphor, kids who might soon find themselves
trapped within an all too real but invisible 'cage of doom', perhaps for
the rest of their lives, perhaps held there for the non-crime of masturbation
or the pitiful excuse of smoking marijuana. I wonder if the awful
irony would be lost upon them then. Yet, I know for a fact that the
feds who ultimately orchestrate it will be quick to deny every bit of it
as part of America's long experiment with tyranny, EVEN going so far as
to lie in federal court to protect their secrets. If you look, you
will find such dangerous ironies built into the fabric of every single
ONE of Ad Council's ongoing commercials - innocent and helpful messages
on the surface, but lurking just below, stuffed with semi-diabolical ironies
and insinuations and hint of the crueler and darker reality.

And Georgia State babbles on... Oh well, at least
they sound better than WREK. "Georgia State Student Radio - Left
on the dial. Wrong on just about everything else..."

Ignorance is Strength

MC
makes the fullest possible use of ignorance. The mainstream news media
never discusses it or airs the complaints of Tis themselves, but regularly
assists in signing, leaving the public to assume what it will from all
the signs out there. Targets to the best of my knowledge are never
informed beforehand exactly why they’re under attack and are left to figure
that out for themselves. Some may not even realized that, for example,
an induced headache were induced at all. Many are surveilled continuously
and never allowed to know who is watching, when the surveillance began,
with whom information is being shared nor to check the accuracy of that
information. They are never told under what conditions or for how
long they are to be left in their virtual torture chambers. They
are never told what laws allow their persecutions, if there are any clear
laws providing for long-term where-you-go-it-goes surveillance and harassments.
Harassers never to talk to targets beyond ‘signing’ them, an ideal situation
to preserve inaccurate information, rumor and assumptions and keep the
controllers of these persecutions in complete control, a code that its
devotees are astonishingly consistent in adhering to. You can just
wake up one morning and find yourself in a kind of hell that may never
end until you die. MC isn’t justice as you learned about it in school
and college. It doesn’t appear to be justice at all.

Entrainment

The redefining of a target's perceptions so as to read
material in TV, books and other language and imagery beyond what appears
at face value or otherwise self-identify with them. It is much easier to
deliver clandestine messagery and information to an entrained person than
a non-entrained one. Many artists have been tossing in suggestive
idioms, metaphors, double-entendre, etc. associated with aspects of MC
for years to enhance that process (often overtly harmless and innocent
but with provocative implications) and entrainment can mean simply waking
the target up to that body of material via other forms of clandestine suggestion
(see below) and training. Over time, a good portion of the dictionary can
be redefined in a target's mind as being metaphorical/symbolic such that
everything around him/her appears to be a kind of grotesque parody of what
it once was. You can entrain targets to self-identify with specific personalities
(as Charles McCoy described in being entrained to identify with Michael
Jackson) and around numerous established metaphors/symbols:

from the common Mountain, (elaborate) French (occupation)
- to borrow from its use in the films ‘Big Fish’ and ‘War of the Worlds’,
red/green/blue (A Scanner Darkly's blue flower), fat/obese, credit, stock
value, etc. The credit/stock value metaphors reflect a regime in
which, in having your every thought, deed, word (and even thought) continuously
available to pore through (within the context of being persecuted cruelly
and unfairly in various other ways), your perecutors become a kind of loan
shark from hell, forever finding fault (and often seeking to INDUCE fault
and drive out anything of value and worth from your life) and forever seeking
to justify these endless persecutions and their own existence, while forever
sell, sell, selling themselves in amorphous ways to the public.

to cold, ice, popsickle, haunted, heat/hot, soak, dunk,
submerge, retirement, fishbowl/aquarium, rain, weather, buried, pressure,
famous (a misnomer), static, (winning the) lottery (seen in conjunction
with the Charles McCoy mirror on the island called Lost and deriving from
Orwell’s inclusion of the lottery in ‘1984’ or older still), dead/deceased,
clear (Just another nice-sounding and self-serving metaphor for what amounts
to the ultimate surveillance tyranny - which may complement/derive from
L. Ron Hubbard's 'dianetics' thing, which in turn (along with the group
and pseudo-religion that professes to adhere to it) may have been a CIA
construction from start to finish. After all, there is what appears
to be that stupid mountain metaphor on the cover of his stupid book and
some similarities in its content and philosophy.)

to an endless number of spontaneous ones (like A Scanner
Darkly's shape shifter suits) that are unique. There are, of course,
more provocative symbols out there, though it is left for you to find them.

MC’s devotees don't really want the metaphors precisely
defined. For example, when they use the 'wolf' symbol. They want the reader/viewer
to conjure their own image of a ravenous, predatory, bloodthirsty animal.
Of something alien, dangerous, unknowable, deadly, not someone that you
can identify with, someone that you can see a bit of yourself within, that
you can understand, warts and all. Recall the recent commercial of
a line of people holding hands against a snarling wolf trying to break
through? That's the sort of image they wish to conjure in your minds. They
want you to think you understand what is going on around you, with few
or no facts.

In some cases entrainment can be a kind of trained delusion
(for example, thinking that every time a Jesus reference appears that it
is a personal reference to the self). After training, the Christ
legend can seem just a kind of sick historical joke, implying crucifiction
more than immaculate savior. I’ve gotten a lot of media harassment
myself and I used to think that every time I saw a Ted or Teddy or a Jack
that I was probably seeing a self-specific sign, before I realized that
those have been in use since before I was born, though some of them HAVE
been self-specific in recent years. When you are persecuted, it is
remarkably easy to self-identify with the Jesus sign, accelerating the
process of entrainment. I usually look for more than just a dropped
name these days before I make a conclusion. Since no-one much cares
about targets anyway, assuming them to be monsters, sickos and evil people
(an impression much cultivated by the efforts of devotees in the creative
media, unbalanced by legitimate news reporting), it's not a problem. Naturally,
you can see that after training, a target's world can become a kind of
horror world with interperative ghosts everywhere, which the media has
done much to cultivate, or even be deluded (such as David Icke) into thinking
themselves religious figures (with some help from their persecutors).
In fact, that is part of the outcome they are after.

Number symbolism is common, much as you will find on license
plates mixed with letters – ways of conveying messages in a minimal space
in a deniable way. In fact, suggestive license plates are apparently
being used sometimes as part of chasing targeted people around on the road.

You’ll see frequent use of 3, 33, 333, 37, 73 in films
like ‘Close Encounters’ and ’12 Monkeys’. You’ll find 39, 93, ‘7
flights up’ and lots of other variations upon 3 on the first couple of
pages of Orwell’s novel 1984, which help to imply that the Winston character
is ‘no good’ and that big brother is good (yep, Orwell was just another
media MC artist and not the libertarian champion that he is widely believed
to be). Those are often strung together into short sentences like
286 from the film ‘Cast Away’ indicating 'to sink someone', ‘two were sunk’
or ‘two consumed/partook of evil’ set alongside a prominent nearby 77.

Chessboard/gaming symbolism is also fairly common as are
the connotations of the individual pieces on the board, often woven into
chessboard scenarios that model real world aspects of ‘the game’.
‘Rook’ can have bird connotations, ‘queen’ often has homosexual connotations,
‘bishop’ often implies the overseer, slave-master, preaching or pursuit
aspects of MC and so forth.

Click/Stimulus Messaging

Click/stimulus messaging is a means of clandestine semi-communications
whereby one or more of several kinds of transient stimuli are used to clandestinely
hijack linguistic material (spoken, heard, read or even thought) or other
symbolic fodder within a target’s sensory environment or stream of thought
so as to deliver a clandestine message that guarantees anonymity for the
giver. For example, inducing television images, house lighting or
radio broadcasts to flicker or spike momentarily, acoustic bursts configured
as click, thump or tap sounds that are difficult to prove as being anything
more than random or house settling noises, the more so in that they are
usually employed to mock or chastise. Some forms are for all practical
purposes impossible to prove as happening at all like electromagnetic-hearing
impulses and/or 'bee sting' sensations upon the skin (see below) that even
someone sitting right next to you would not have a ghost of a chance of
even noticing. All forms can leave the physical source of the stimuli
unlocatable – the single common denominator of their use and development.
For example, a targeted individual (TI) might be presented with a click
sound when the character in the western that the target is watching says,
“I’m gonna shoot ya down.” or “Maybe you should kill yourself.” Unlike
a normal radio signal, which is continuous, the source of an instantaneous
electromagnetic burst is much more difficult to try to home in on without
specialized equipment. Even capturing the signature on an indicator
or recording device of some kind would prove little if anything.

All
can be used to deliver a relentless barrage of suggestion that can be employed
to entrain. In my experience, the very act of click/stimulus messaging
over time tends to entrain by repeatedly forcing the mind to perceive dual
meaning and symbolism in words and symbols that are being hijacked.
It's difficult to say whether the emotional content of the media itself
being hijacked or the relationship between the attacker and the target
has more to do with the impact on the target. On one hand, stimulating
a helpless target when, for example, the Gollum character from Lord of
the Rings is leering out of the screen saying the words 'you don't have
any friends' tends to be more emotionally powerful than words in some dry
documentary, although those can be excruciating too. On the other hand,
if a target is feeling oppressed and powerless, then clicking on a smile
from some cartoon character can hurt too, much like a cruel smile from
a sibling after a parental chastisement can hurt.

Stimulus messaging can be configured so as to be clearly
discernible, particularly when the attacker wants to be quite certain that
a given message gets through. It can be configured so as to be so soft
that a target cannot be sure that he/she has been stimulated at all so
as to enhance paranoia or confusion or to build self-perpetuating psychological
mechanisms that will continue in the absence of further artificial stimuli
(i.e. "Did I just hear something? Did I just hear something?"). It can
be configured so as to emulate ambient environmental noises like nearby
car doors slamming or house settling noises that will accomplish much the
same goal. Not only negative effects can be induced, but with clever, persistent
application of suggestion, it is possible to roll a target into delusions
of grandeur or self-importance just as it is possible to roll a target
into a state of despair. With click/stimulus messaging, an attacker can
effectively leer, smile, smirk or laugh at a target, can disinform, dissuade,
redirect, encourage, interrogate, punish, insult, etc. Depending greatly
on the target's constitution, it might actually be possible to eventually
bend the target's mind into a state of outright and not easily recoverable
psychosis.

Although the presence of audible linguistic media in a
target's sensory environment provides plenty of rich fodder for stimulus
messaging, an attack that involves no such material at all is possible
too. For example, ‘clicking’ when a target's surveillable field of view
lands upon objects that can be interpreted as somehow symbolic or self-specific
or when a target is simply reading. Because the technology for surveilling
thought itself is in the arsenal, clicking upon moments from the target’s
internal dialog is another method. Although there is less linguistic/symbolic
fodder available when no external material is nearby (unless one’s internal
dialog tends to chatter), that configuration is in some ways more disturbing.
Even if the target attempts to drown out audible language or isolate him/herself
in a featureless room devoid of any linguistic/symbolic fodder at all,
there is still no way to avoid an attack that employs 'bee stings' (see
below) in conjunction with a surveillance of the internal dialog, except
perhaps via the meditative technique of silencing the internal dialog altogether.
But that would be a pretty boring and unhealthy way to live, so it's usually
best to learn to cope with an attack than try to avoid it. But doing
so might afford a little temporary relief. Even then, electromagnetic
voice-to-skull can still be used to get the message across. One way
or another, they can make it unavoidable.

Imagine
the joy of hearing a soft thump from source unknown at the moment that,
for example, the black cloaked wraiths lift their swords while preparing
to put to death the hobbits in the film, “The Lord of the Rings”. Effectively,
it would be a death threat that carries not just the force of words and
the ignorance of not knowing who is conveying it, but the force of all
the magic (in this case black magic) that the small army involved in the
making of a film can bring to bear - music, cinematography and all.

A concerted click/stimulus messaging attack can be very
similar to this excerpt from the CIA's "KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation"
manual, its 1963 guidebook on Interrogation.

The aim of the technique "is to confound the expectations
and conditioned reactions of the interrogatee"; it is "designed not only
to obliterate the familiar but to replace it with the weird." For the subject
barraged with "double-talk questions" and "illogical" statements, all sensible
points of reference begin to blur: "[A]s the process continues, day after
day if necessary, the subject begins to try to make sense of the situation,
which becomes mentally intolerable. Now he is likely to make significant
admissions, or even to pour out his whole story, just to stop the flow
of babble which assails him."

Basically, many of the techniques of a conventional interrogation
can be brought to bear, except that the interrogation can proceed for years
and, due to the sheer anonymity and lack of proofs, are only more ripe
for misuse. There is no blood, broken bones and black eyes, which
make such attacks easier for the public to disregard. If there are
burn marks or other observables as some targets report, how could you prove
what caused them?

Cough Messaging and Body Language

Say that you and I are co-workers and you want to provide
a pretext for expulsion. Since laws and workplace rules generally
forbid harassment and creating a hostile environment for co-workers, you
have to be clever in your attack. So how do you go about accomplishing
your goal?

You begin your offensive by passing by my office door
and coughing as you pass. I will think nothing of it. Do it again and I'll
think that maybe you have a cold this week or that pure chance has dealt
one of those somewhat unlikely but entirely random occurrences. Do it a
third and fourth time and you'll have captured my attention. I'll realize
that something is up between us. Do it a fifth and sixth time and I'll
start to get angry. If I confront you over the matter, you can just smile
with a touch of practiced surprise on your face as you say, 'Goodness,
are you feeling OK? You seem a little disturbed. Maybe you should rest
or see a doctor', which will only make me angrier, since the possibility
in random occurrence has long passed and because I'll know that you have
the initiative and are working me in a way that can't be easily stopped
or proven.

After capturing my attention, you can even change tactics,
perhaps sucking air through your teeth or clinking a pen against a key
in your pocket to irritate me and you'll be just as effective, since capturing
my attention and provoking me was really your goal in the first place and
by now we both know it. My id will do most of the work for you, since I,
like all human beings, am instinctively programmed to react and to answer
a perceived aggression. If I keep confronting you, then you can take the
matter of my 'strange behavior' and 'instability' to the boss or the personnel
department. If I try to tell others about it, my protests will seem like
nonsense or the product of paranoia and will probably only get me deeper
into the mess that you have initiated. If I'm goaded to violence or threats
of violence, then you have already won and my future in our workplace will
be brief and my being forced into psychiatry or prison will be easy. About
the only way to prove the fact of your attack will be for me to continuously
record on video the entrance to my doorway and collect enough of those
moments as you pass by to prove beyond a reasonable doubt what you have
been up to.

However, after having gained my attention, if you change
tactics, then I will have the added burden of showing how sucking air through
your teeth or clicking pen to key is a part of your effort. Alternatively,
you can begin to 'trigger' me at other locations to make the collection
of video evidence far more difficult. Perhaps you will choose to start
coughing (or whatever) as I pass by YOUR office door or while passing me
in the hall. One thing that I must not do is to respond in kind to your
attack, since, because you have already shown a determination to force
my departure or entry into psychiatry or punish me in one way or another,
you may be seeking to record any such counter responses and ultimately
turn the tables to make ME look like the aggressor, particularly in that
such harassments are usually group efforts in which my complaints and evidence
are going to be disregarded anyway. A truly portable cam (like a
pen camera) and recorder is about my best bet to prove what you are up
to, capable of capturing the immediate environment throughout a typical
day. Psychologically, my best bet is to use the situation to learn to overcome
the natural tendency to react and to learn how to live life more strategically
than I did before.

Intended (rather than spontaneous) coughing and laughter
in coincidence with chosen moments in public venues in which crowds gather
(movies, concerts, etc.) is common. It can be used to enhance the
paranoia and discomfort of specific targets at moments chosen to be specific
to targets by harassers who have embarrassing information on their targets.
It can be used in a more general way by conservatives to preach by choosing
moments agreeable (or disagreeable) to their personal attitudes and opinions.
Even non-targets can mistakenly believe that they’re being coughed at.
The cooperative innuendo of filmmakers, musicians, etc. often complements
such tactics.

'Bee Stings'

(Signed in the film Blade Runner - "An itch you can never
scratch", in the film A Scanner Darkly (the man covered in insects), and
in Steven Colbert's Tek Jansen cartoon series - "Will Tek Jansen avoid
the angry bees?")

Bee stings are a technology for inducing the sensation
of pin-prick, crawling insect and other sensations felt upon the skin.
They can be inflicted in such a way as to cause pain as punishment/deterrent,
to induce an irritating itching sensation or to induce mild, non-painful
sensations as a method of extraordinarily clandestine signaling/messaging.
When employed as a semi-communications vehicle, a number of schemes can
be applied. It can be used as one more form of simple click/stimulus
messaging. It can be more sophisticated such as stinging the right
knee to convey 'yes' and the left knee to convey 'no'. With some
training, the method can be still more sophisticated, employing the parts
of the body as a kind of phoneme dictionary (i.e. sting the thigh, followed
by the ring finger to convey the word 'thing') or as a kind of symbolic
dictionary (i.e. sting the heel of the foot to call a target a 'heel').

Obviously, this represents a form of clandestine communications
that is extremely well hidden and might also be in use by American intel
as one of their own clandestine inter-communications methods in the field.
It can also be employed so as to cue members of the public participating
in an attack to, for example, cough at a target entering a restaurant or
work targets in other ways like marking a target’s own thoughts (see below)
that can make a target feel as if he or she is going crazy.

How stings are delivered
remains unclear and is, like the technology of remote thought surveillance,
a jealously guarded secret. However, they can be delivered with precision
even while a target is moving at highway speeds in a car - even someone
else's car, which implies both that no nearby transponder is necessary
(except perhaps for a conjectured implant that a target always carries
with him/her) and that the central nervous system is being manipulated
rather than the parts of the body directly.

Personally, I don’t believe
that implants are involved at all. I think that the techniques make
use of phased array antennas suitable for focusing energy into (or measuring
energy within) localized regions in space over long distances and that
can be rapidly scanned, modulated, steered, multiplexed, etc. I believe
it relies on focusing upon and tracking the area in and around the skull
to detect the tiny individual action potentials of the nerves in terms
of surveillance. In terms of influence, I believe that it relies
on transmitting back to the skull composites of those previously surveilled
temporal patterns of action potentials specific to a given brain and to
specific memories, thoughts and physical sensations much like John Norseen
of Lockheed Martin is supposedly concentrating on as part of his research.

If in use, implants would
offer some advantages like transforming neural data to or from ambiguous
codes, boosting signal strength and being more readily locatable by a remote
antenna than the tiny action potentials of the brain alone. They
would offer some disadvantages in leaving a possible forensic trail of
proof, though if tiny enough, would be difficult or impossible to locate
during MRI scans or, if embedded within the brain, impossible to remove
once implanted. Of course, the temporal patterns of action potentials
within a given brain are already effectively encoded by the unique neural
network path lengths of a given brain and would appear as just a jumble
of noise on an oscilloscope anyway, requiring sophisticated pattern matching
algorithms and hardware to make any sense of them and their association
with behaviors, sensory stimuli, read, spoken, heard or contemplated words,
recalled memories, etc. that those relate to.

My complete bee sting
symbol dictionary from personal experience currently is as follows for
the right side of my body. It may not be exactly equivalent to my
persecutors' intended dictionary, but that is due primarily to confusion
and ambiguity inherent in the method itself. Equivalents on the left
side of the body are established as representing negatives. My toes
have been established as basically an 'also' equivalent of the fingers
(for example - whereas the right middle finger means 'f___ you', the right
middle toe means 'f___ you too' usually transmitted to me in response to
my cursing or showing anger towards my persecutors or thinking or speaking
critically of others. The negatives are more confusing than the positives.
For example, bee stinging my left thumb has been established as a negative
of the word ‘dumb’. I’m continuously frustrated and confounded in
deciding how to interpret it. Am I being told that what I just thought,
said, did or heard was not dumb? Or am I being told not to be dumb?
The latency in my persecutors’ responses is also frustrating and confusing.
They’re quick and spontaneous only when they want to be. After all,
why should they wish to spend their day devoting their entire attention
just to me? I wouldn’t either. But their refusal to ever take
a few moments to simply answer a few simple questions and provide immediate
responses and only transmit their semi-communications at their leisure
has been to me particularly frustrating and disappointing (as if bee stings
were capable of conveying clear communications anyway) and even when I
provide them cover by phrasing my queries as yes/no questions within my
unspoken thought, expecting bee stings in response. They could be
kind enough to do so. Usually they won’t. Frustration, confusion
and the hopelessness in being kept perpetually ignorant are obviously one
of the main sources of pain for all targeted individual’s, part of the
price of our persecutors’ cover. But such needless cruelty seems
to me one of those things about MC most in need of reform, though I doubt
that will ever happen, pain being probably the single common denominator
of MC in the first place, and confusion and ignorance are helpful tools
that help to inhibit organization and resistance and preserve our persecutors’
deniability, which has lasted for over half a century.

(YHST = You, he, she
or they. Notice the use of body parts that have a near phonetic match
to the words that they wish those body parts to symbolize. That is
apparently a natural choice, making the training of the dictionary easier
to train in and remember (unfortunately). A given symbol is trained
in like this – the phrase ‘take it on the chin’ pops up on the radio or
TV. They transmit a sting to the chin at that moment. Repeat
a time or two for confirmation and voila, it’s trained in. Only if
I were asleep could I avoid that involuntary and unwanted training.
Thereafter, they can use that symbol in response to my unspoken thoughts
or other contexts much like in any language.

Chin - 'Take it on the
chin' or 'Expect a punitive response' or 'punch in the mouth'

Ring finger - 'That person,
place or thing is or has been in one way/sense or another wedded/coupled
to or associated with you or is a criminal or evil or you are associated
with that or we have associated you with that (in some way that you may
eventually discover)'

Thumb - 'Dumb'

Lip - 'Kiss' or ‘whisper’
usually implying that something is being said about me

Wrist - 'Masturbation'
or 'YHST is/are a jerk'

Top of the Shoulder -
'YHST should'

Chest - 'That is or would
be best'

Buttock - Ass or 'You're
an ass'

Base of spine - 'YHST
is/are a spy (i.e. anyone who disagrees with or is resisting us or is our
enemy or is a criminal)'

During a recent airing of 60 Minutes (2009), a guest who
had recently had (as I recall) a controversial encounter with police over
marijuana about which he was being interviewed, was being asked by Katie
Kurick (sp?) a question relating to the encounter. Immediately after
the question and while he was in the process of answering, the man rubbed
his finger across his nose to relieve an itch. What evidently happened
was this (and this has been done to me many, many times now in various
ways and, er, places). He was given a bee sting (configured so as
to produce an itch) in an effort to force him to appear to make the Pinnochio
sign (defined cleverly and intentionally within the film Close Encounters
and elsewhere) so that he would appear to be calling himself a liar (presumably
in a way that could be spun as being spontaneous and rooted in the psychology
of a guilty mind). The tactic seems subtle to the point of absurdity,
unless
you are already steeped in the method of signing, in which case the tactic
becomes rather straightforward. This is just one of the many ways
that the criminal federal culpripts behind the bee stings actually manufacture
evidence of a sort. My explaining it to you unfortunately (or perhaps
fortunately) only makes the tactic that much more evident, which is why
I remain semi-reluctant to mention it at all, since the criminal feds can
and will forever deny mischief, regardless of what you believe. They
may well even accelerate their use of such criminal tactics in live and
televised settings after I post this description.

In my experience, even as the highly visible signage on
television and film is occasionally attempting to give the appearance to
the public of being kind and judicious, whomever is working the bee stings
is busy being utterly vile and contradicting all of those apparent expressions
with plenty of "NO's" and "Angry's". The result, as far as
I can tell, is that the public is regularly being mislead as to the nature
of the whole business.

Physiological Tactics

Vision can not only be effectively surveilled as one component
of conscious thought (presumably by surveillance of the visual cortex or
some portion of the brain that encompasses both processed visual stimuli
AND recalled visual memories), but it can be interfered with too.
Not having any background (or much interest) in neurology, that’s about
the best I can offer. Causing blurry vision, diplopia or eyes that hurt
(or headache pain that appears to be centered just behind one or both eyes)
are all fairly common tactics reported by targeted people that are all
too easily (and falsely) construed as being symptoms of brain diseases
and other maladies – those seem more likely in the minds of most people
than the fact that the vision centers of the brain can somehow be surveilled
remotely. That ability has been cleverly 'signed' in a number of
places - the lion (the word suggesting 'lie' or 'lying') that confronts
Jesus and calls him a liar with aspirations of grandeur in Scorsese's 'Last
Temptation of Christ' (look closely), Weird Al Yankovich's randy animated
cat with dual-colored eyes (recall that cat symbolism is common in creative
media MC), the tumor in 'Mothman Prophecies', Tim Burton's leaky little
Napoleon in 'Corpse Bride', the surly one-eyed commander in Battlestar
Galactica that gets his eyeball crushed underfoot while in a prison camp,
etc. In fact, though it may seem unlikely, the old wives tale that
masturbation causes blindness may well have been an MC oriented association,
particularly in view of the fact that sex is frequently an element in MC
attacks. I don't know about Darryl Hannah's one-eyed (and ultimately
no-eyed) assassin, although I do know that Quentin Tarentino is involved
in creative media MC (for example, the bleeping out of Beatrix Kiddo’s
name in ‘Kill Bill’ and his placing her momentarily in a classroom in those
two extremely sensationalist but entertaining films). Vision debilitation
is just one more form of punishment. Fortunately, whatever I was
subjected to was not permanent.

Along the same lines, considering the sophistication of
the means of influence upon the central nervous system, it is surely capable
of skewing (or outright faking) the results of lie-detector and other physiological
testing, such that even if a targeted person wished to prove the honesty
of his/her testimonial, such a test might well say only what a target's
persecutors wished it to indicate (i.e. cause a slight increase in heart
rate and perspiration here and there). Certainly, inducing a simulated
stress reaction or transmitting an emotionally oriented psychological trigger
is doable, even if suppressing one may not be. So, such a test would
probably best be conducted a good hundred feet or more underground.
If some variation upon UWB (ultrawide band) signals are employed (which
are ground penetrating and difficult to detect anyway – distributing energy
across a huge frequency spectrum and employing extremely brief pulses)
and/or implants are used as an intermediary, then even 100 feet might not
be enough, as some Tis appear to have confirmed after entering caves to
see if escape from the harassment is possible.

With such a remote and clandestine mastery of the functions
of the brain, many or most of the separate effects that targeted individuals
report, from induced tinnitus to hearing voices to induced directed dreaming
to migraine like pain (that can be extreme) to bee stings to itching sensations
to vision problems to so-called holograms to thought surveillance to numerous
other phenomena ALL may be just myriad variations upon that single comprehensive
technology. In many ways, surveillance and manipulation of the brain
and central nervous system is the ultimate technology. Is it any
wonder that US intel would seek to keep the fact of it so secret, employ
it in clandestine ways and weave it into bogus aliens, ghost, religious
and other phenomena? I just don’t understand how they appear to have
gained the RIGHT to do so at all to so many peaceful American citizens,
regardless of their transgressions, aberrations, deviations from the norm
(or lack thereof). The media junk leads us all to believe that MC
is always for use against corrupt, evil sickos. But is it?

Once, while watching an
episode of 'Family Guy' in which an animated Santa (a frequent MC symbol)
lights up a cigarette (an MC clue in and of itself - i.e. bad Santa) and
says, "Yes, we can do things like that." in the context of an unrelated
conversation, I found to my surprise that I had also lit a cigarette at
exactly the same moment - I mean the exact instant. Not proof of
anything, of course, but more than a little eerie. On another occasion,
when my best friend and his wife and two kids were on one of their approximately
two brief visits to my home per year (at all other times my house is empty
of all but me), in the middle of the night, I was walking to the bathroom
and they did the 'causality' thing to me (see below). I was not in
particularly great need of arriving at my destination on time, if you take
my meaning. Nothing like that had ever occurred to me before.
Nothing. The conjunction with that event and their rare visit was
not just eerie, it was compellingly so. I can't wait to see the network
take this description out of context and spin it onto the screen in some
grotesque context, as it so enjoys doing. And of course, signs here
and there in the media (The Game, The Matrix Reloaded, The Stand, etc.)
that clearly corroborate.

On another occasion, a
vivid mental 'Jesus visitation' while considering the Jesus legend and
its use in the MC enterprise, which I don't for an instant take to be some
authentic religious experience.

Combinations

There are quite a variety of different tools in the current
arsenal from the various ways of interfering with the operation of electronic
equipment to public mobbing tactics to neurological manipulation. A deliberate
effort has apparently been made to make each target's experience unique
both to explore and evaluate the most effective methods, to better exploit
the individual weaknesses of specific individuals, and to make the determination
of consistencies between their experiences that might ultimately amount
to a preponderance of circumstantial evidence of the reality of MC more
difficult (i.e. a target being hit with migraine like pain does not appear
to have anything in common with one that is being bombarded with computer
virus attacks or one that is being harassed in public places or one that
is being hit primarily with 'bee stings' or one that is being mirrored
in the media or one that reports hearing ghostly noises in the attic).

Targets can see some strange scenarios that sometimes
seem to defy reality or to be acts of God. Like reading a passage
in a newspaper or even thinking a given thought and almost simultaneously
hearing a car horn sound or someone in a crowd cough. No wonder some
targets get the impression that everyone around them is an alien, surrounded
by robots or beings from the future or other weird delusions! That
particular scenario can be implemented with a thought surveillance of the
target, that is transmitted to a 'manager' (human or artificial) who/which
then cues a member of the network to cough with, for example, a mild signaling
bee sting to the throat or which directly controls the honking of a car
horn. No wonder so many CIA recruits are disappointed to find that
their jobs frequently have less to do with cloak and dagger spy work and
more to do with computer programming, perhaps to set up and manage some
of these weird scenarios. If you've been worked like me, you may
even occasionally find someone singing at you between the lines in the
newspaper, magazines, television or movies, so great are the number of
involved people in the news and creative media these days (most of whom
may know nothing at all about the reality of the esoteric technologies
also in the psy-ops arsenal). But so sophisticated have even public
domain voice recognition, natural language translation and other technologies
become that the entirely automated implementation of many scenarios is
also within the realm of possibility. Consider the hell of being
driven to nervous breakdown via thought surveillance and bee stings alone
by an unattended machine that for all you know is a human being or human
beings on the other end of the line.

A target can be placed in other more deadly scenarios
too. Like being 'gifted' with an artificially induced sexual response
(erection) at an inappropriate moment via technology of remote neurological
influence by one party who is hidden from another who surveills only the
sexual response, thus misleading the second as to the target's nature and
predispositions. Or alternatively, the anonymous giver of the artificial
‘gift’ treating the target as though the reaction were spontaneous and
non-induced as part of hard-ball mind gaming including attempting to convince
the target of predispositions that he/she does not have, which is diabolical.
When your central nervous system can be manipulated directly and surreptitiously,
it is not necessarily even possible to tell if a behavior or physiological
reaction were spontaneous or externally induced or steered (short of simply
knowing yourself well), although I don’t believe that it is possible to
fully roboticize people over any but brief periods of time. Hope
not.

Although I have no shred of doubt that one or both of
those means have been applied against me personally, I do NOT accuse my
persecutors of having robotically controlled any of my conscious actions,
or voluntary or involuntary behaviors beyond trivial, momentary ways useful
for mind gaming, pressuring and paranoia enhancement, and I assume that
using such means to obtain outright false and fabricated evidence of guilt
or predispositions is not part of their code of conduct (if they have one).
I hope it isn’t that diabolical anyway. Trickery, pressure, interrogation,
depression enhancement, leveraging ignorance and paranoia and destabilization
tactics appear to be more in line with that code. However, some targeted
persons are complaining of precisely such clearly diabolical tactics, but
I have no way of measuring their honesty or sanity. In any case,
I assume sole responsibility for ALL of my conscious behaviors, predispositions
and beliefs, though I know those have been influenced by all the years
of pressure, cruelty, gaming, prattle, endless suggestion and being beset
by an antagonistic and hostile surveillance presence for so long.
I’m trying to be as objective and unemotional in describing this as possible.

- In another scenario, extraordinarily ugly and/or terrifying
dream imagery can be induced artificially as a means of punishment, psychological
destabilization or aversive reinforcement. Reward, positive reinforcement
and the creation of (perhaps false and insincere) bonds and beliefs, can
be induced with beautiful/attractive dream imagery too. The two extremes
may be applied in combination in carrot and stick scenarios.

- In another, one or more provocateurs can attempt to
drive you to angry, frustrated outbursts, whose efforts are hidden from
other observers who are attempting to judge your psychological stability,
innocence and such. For example, calling you a jerk via bee sting
when a line like "You murdered those people." pops up in the boring crime
drama that you’re not paying attention to but others are. Or simply
causing an irresistable itch that induces you to scratch. If you
react to the bee sting, then you can look to the others as though you spontaneously
reacted to that moment (or alternatively to make you THINK that they are
up to such antics in order to induce stress in making you wonder how you’re
being perceived by observers that you have to assume are there).
Clever, but not extraordinarily so. My persecutors have employed
that tactic frequently. So, inducing false outbursts, though diabolical,
IS a part of their code, whether or not they attempt to use that as false
evidence of predispositions or guilt. A technique like that could
be used to keep suspicion cast upon me and help insure a long stay within
their clutches.

- In another, one's persecutors can discourage normal
or healthy behaviors or those that would be helpful to the target with
repeated suggestions like 'dumb', 'boring', 'shoot you down', 'stupid',
'angry' and encourage abnormal behaviors (or behaviors that can be more
easily spun as abnormal) with repeated encouraging suggestions like ‘funny’,
‘like that’, ‘good’, etc. - and then after reaping the benefits of their
efforts, immediately turn around and chastise those behaviors, all of which
can help twist one’s mind up in frustration and anger in being used in
such a way with their own provocative efforts hidden and unprovable all
the while with nothing you can really do about it.

In my experience, they repeatedly demand the termination
of behaviors as common and normal as masturbation (blush), while threatening
to block any attempt to find a meaningful romantic relationship, offering
no believable guarantee that they will ever shut up or finally leave in
return for obeying and offering nothing in return for the years of injury
they have already done, offering only a future of slavery or suicide as
a concretely trustable escape from the pain. I can't see it all as
much of anything but a recipee for building manchurian candidates (for
want of a better term). The hypocrisy of people who consider themselves
to be defenders of law and morality and who hide from the consequences
of their every word and deed never ceases to astound me.

The following (not terribly well acted) portrayal of one
CIA assassin indoctrinating and seducing a 'recruit' from the Korean/American
film 1st Testament
CIA Vengeance is fairly telling. In the real world, the mechanics
of that scenario would probably go something like this:

The trainer knows beforehand that both he and the recruit
are under thought surveillance by a remote human (or perhaps even artificial)
operator at some remote facility (or possibly the trainer has a direct
link via some intervening computational node to the 'recruit'). The
recruit is gifted with an electromagnetically induced migraine probably
at the trainer's cue by his simply thinking the words, "Cue the headache,
please." The trainer couches the deception in some babble about a
bogus religion (the word probably being standard creative media code for
social trends that they’re trying to inhibit and punish like the inclusion
of the word ‘file’, which is usually creative media code for pedophile).
At the trainer's cue of, "What do you see?", the operator injects a subtle
image of a red ball (the color red being symbolically meaningful) either
at the trainer's specific unspoken request or cued as a step in a prearranged
plan. The trainer could set up the entire scenario a few moments
before simply by thinking it out and waiting for a mild 'bee sting' or
other form of clandestine confirmation from the operator. After a
bit of verbal hand waving by the trainer, the operator modifies the image
to a symbol of clarity (both red and clear being common MC metaphors) and
reduces the migraine pain, perhaps adding a mild feeling of euphoria as
a positive reinforcement. The recruit is impressed, mislead and her
dependency and false trust in the trainer grows. If you know how
to ‘read’, a moment later (not pictured) the trainer seduces the recruit
into another kind of trap entirely.

These days, you may never meet that recruiter in person
at all, particularly if you weren't 'recruited' through the front door
(i.e. are immaculate), and/or you are considered a security risk.
You simply wake up one day with a surveillance presence that follows you
wherever you go and 'bee stings', voice-to-skull, 'click messages', pain,
etc. as the primary incoming communications and punishment vehicle(s) -
no trace evidence whatsoever that you have, in fact, been enslaved to surveillance,
perhaps for the rest of your life. Oh, you can move about, but don't
expect to be truly happy or to feel secure ever again, once they latch
onto you.

Any fool can see that MC is dangerous for a variety of
reasons and its practitioners don't seem to be held to any particular code
of conduct except perhaps insuring that MC itself looks good and necessary
and that they themselves are protected from responsibility. It is
in a very real sense esoteric warfare. Only the integrity of the
persecutor(s), who have little to lose as far as I can tell in being so
well insulated, would appear to be a limiting factor in how far they can
go. Is there any wonder why I would fight so hard to expose it and
its devotees fight so hard to keep it cloaked in mystery and well (and
vaguely) regarded by the public? Some in the media have even been
working pretty energetically lately to cast it as a kind of hospital.
For example, Steven King's 'Kingdom Hospital' is MC oriented (to an obvious
degree that is almost cartoonish) and the self-serving name conveys an
impression. It may be to some degree, depending on the individual
case. Certainly media MC regularly implies as much. Media MC
examples of the horror genre appear a bit closer to the mark than most
other genres in my opinion (except dark comedy or perhaps the form of the
reptilians from the TV series 'V', reptilians who ironically also call
themselves angels)! None of it should be taken lightly as though
an American citizen were just a rat in a cage with no rights at all and
much or most of it is astonishingly cruel and dehumanizing.

The Soft Kill

From
'Scanner Darkly', we have an intended mirror at-home continuous mockery
and ridicule. The many eyes, of course, symbolize surveillance awareness.

"Bud knew a guy like that who'd somehow gotten infected
with a meme that ran advertisements for roach motels, in Hindi, superimposed
on the bottom right-hand corner of his visual field, twenty-four hours
a day, until the guy whacked himself." - Neal Stephenson 'The Diamond Age"

There
are now a number of ways of putting people into positions in which death
is a better practical alternative to life. Simply configure the 'bee
stinger' tech such that the target feels as though his/her skin is crawling
with insects 24/7 as is deliberately mirrored in the film 'A Scanner
Darkly' (though that film's makers will claim that the pictured moment
merely symbolizes effects of use of the drug in that film called D for
death, in spite of the fact that D is cleary a dual metaphor encompassing
the some aspects of MC). Or use voice-to-skull to fill a target's
mind with babble 24/7. Or deprive him/her indefinitely of sleep.
Or use the thought surveillance tech in conjunction with one of the several
means of semi-communications to kick down and mock every hopeful thought
that occurs within the targets's stream of thought 24/7 (yes, it can be
done). Apply excruciating pain 24/7. The key is relentlessness.
Spread disease about the target (suggestions of pedaphelia are ideal) behind
his/her back with instructions to never talk about it directly with the
target and only insinuate what you have been lead to believe. The
target will most likely be dead in as little as a few weeks. And
not one of them leaves a trail of evidence back to the source. That
is the spirit and guiding philosophy of MC. Although I'm sure it's
not part of the code to deliberately induce death, undoubtedly it happens
frequently. After all, everyone who is under attack faces the choice
of escape from a painful and inescapable situation every day.

Also from Neal Stephenson in his novel "Snow Crash":

"A naked PR plant, a half-hour television commercial
with no purpose whatsoever other than to let L. Bob Rife tell his side
of a particular issue. It seems that a number of Rife's programmers,
the people who made his systems run, got together and formed a union -
unheard of, for hackers - and filed a suit against Rife, claiming
that he had placed audio and video bugs in their homes, in fact placed
all of them under twenty-four-hour surveillance, and harassed
and threatened some programmers who were making what he called "unacceptable
lifestyle choices". For example, when one of his programmers
and her husband engaged in oral sex in their own bedroom one night, the
next morning she was called into Rife's office, where he called her a slut
and a sodomite and told her to clean out her desk. The bad publicity
from this so annoyed Rife that he felt the need to blow a few million on
some more PR.

"I deal in information," he says to the smarmy,
toadying pseudojournalist[people like me
apparently, though I don't FEEL particularly smarmy] who "interviews"
him. He's sitting in his office in Houston, looking slicker than
normal. "All television going out to consumers throughout the world
goes through me. Most of the information transmitted to and from
the CIC [Central Intelligence Corporation] database passes through my networks.
The Metaverse - the entire Street - exists by virtue of a network that
I own and control."

"But that means, if you'll just follow my reasoning
for a bit, that when I have a programmer working under me who is working
with that information, he is wielding enormous power. Information
is going into his brain. And it's staying there. It travels
with him when he goes home at night. It gets all tangled up into
his dreams, for Christ's sake. He talks to his wife about it.
And goddamn it, he doesn't have any right to that information. If
I was running a car factory, I wouldn't let workers drive the cars home
or borrow tools. But that's what I do at five o'clock each day, all
over the world, when my hackers go home from work.

"When they used to hang rustlers in the old
days, the last thing they would do is piss their pants [yes,
as Stephenson deniably confirms, that capability IS in the neuro-tech arsenal].
That was the ultimate
sign, you see, that they had lost control
over their own bodies, that they were about to die. See, it's the
first function of any organization to control its own sphincters.
We're not even doing that. See, we're working on refining our management
techniques so that we can control that information no matter where it is
- on our hard disks or even inside the programmer's heads.
Now, I can's say more because I got competition to worry about. But
it is my fervent hope that in five or ten years, this kind of thing won't
even be an issue."

Yes, Stephenson is undoubtedly just another 'signer'.
What I would like to ask is, "Who is this toady (but brilliant) pseudonovelist
to scare people away from behaviors as harmless, personal, legal and absolutely
none of his network's business as fellatio by associating them (oh so craftily
and deniably) with the horrors of mind control?" Whether that behavior
alone is enough to bring on an attack (or just a bit of a headache at an
opportune moment) is anyone's goess. Corporation indeed (as his own
fat royalty checks roll in). Sure, elsewhere he alludes to more grotesque
behaviors in relation to other fictional characters. But so what?
The question is not whether he has the right. There is nothing to
stop him and his army of 'vague-ans'. But is it right or fair?
Also from the novel:

Gargoyles represent the embarrassing side of the Central
Intelligence Corporation. Instead of using laptops, they wear their
computers on their bodies, broken up into separate modules that hang on
the waist, on the back, on the headset. They serve as human surveillance
devices, recording everything that happens around them. Nothing looks
stupider; these getups are the modern-day equivalent of the slide-rule
scabbard or the calculator pouch on the belt, marking the user as belonging
to a class that is at once above and far below human society.

So, how would you like to be a 'gargoyle', kept ignorant
while you are being ripped apart in a variety of ways and rendered legally
and socially helpless? No problem. Hate paves the way.
Hate clears the road.

He's watching a well-known television program called
Eye
Spy. It is produced by CIC and syndicated through one of the
major studios. It is reality television: CIC picks out one of their
agents who is involved in a wet operation - doing some actual cloak-and-dagger
work - and has him put on a gargoyle rig so that everything he sees and
hears is transmitted back to the home base in Langley. This material
is then edited into a weekly hour-long program.

Transpose CIC agent with target of CIC agents and you
just about have the insinuation intended by the author. Unfortunately,
the 'editing' is useful for embellishing surveillance facts and leaving
out other important facts as part of parodies and heresay that can be as
provocative as they wish and can if necessary multiply the hate to keep
the system nice and stable at the gargoyle's expense, as it has
succeeded in doing for over sixty years. It's a bit like the recent
The New Yorker magazine cover, which may itself represent a cheap and very
much intended attempt to discredit the Obamas posing as satire. Yes,
Mr. Obama was once pictured in Muslim garb and he and his wife have been
pictured giving the unique hand greeting. No, Mrs. Obama does not
have a large afro and does not wear a machine gun, camouflage or army boots.
No, Mr. Obama does not wear Muslim garb as a fashion statement. Nor
do either burn the American flag or keep a picture of bin Laden on their
wall. And the editors chuckle to themselves over their cleverness.
The major difference is that in the case of the gargoyle, it's more
difficult to prove who is being shot, though nearly as apparent.

Isolation

The O'Brien character's claim in Orwell's 1984 that a
man can be divided from his family and friends is quite real too, often
plays a role in MC operations, and can be accomplished in several ways.

- Repeatedly suggest to the target that a friend or loved
one (beyond the target's immediate environment) hates him/her.

- Create fear that their association is mutually dangerous,
perhaps reinforcing the impression with a vehicle like media 'mirroring'
or entrainment (enhancing self-identification with fictional characters
that are engaged in a conflict and have at least some similarities to the
target and associate) or via COINTELPRO style tactics of slander and character
assassination.

- By telling the friend(s) or loved one(s) that the target
is sick and being 'remedied' (perhaps revolving around a clandestine effort
to thrust the target into psychiatry against his/her will) or under investigation
and must not be spoken to about the matter directly, perhaps suggesting
to the friend or loved one that they only 'sign' the target in order to
assist in the 'remedy' or investigation. Suspicion and anger will
grow, while the friend or loved one believe themselves to be doing a good
deed.

- Implicitly via the misunderstandings, incredulity and
frustration that inevitably crops up between targeted and non-targeted
people.

In time, it can be done. Eventually, the effort
takes on a life of its own, as the trained suspicions and angers snowball
back in the real world. A suspicion that cannot be proven false is
not easily put to rest. The destruction of trust is the key.
People who cannot talk to each other are doomed to separate.

For example, people who watch the TV program 'American
Chopper' are aware of the surly, argumentative father. When I watched
it, my persecutors would repeatedly mark (quite frequently) moments from
his outbursts as he interracted with his son. I found it difficult
to avoid subconsciously seeing those suggestions become a part (at least
on a short term basis) of my impressions of my own father, even though
I understood consciously what was going on. They can observe or engender
a grain of suspicion within the mind and then enhance it to full blossom
or create it from scratch. Just today, the thought drifted through my mind,
"I wonder if my father would like to see me dead." My anonymous persecutors
were quick to bee-sting my right knee indicating "Yes". I have no
idea if the affirmative somehow came from him or if my persecutors simply
seek to sew hatred between us and found a good opportunity. Ignorance
is strength. One or more of my unidentifiable persecutors has done
much the same in terms of one old love whom I remained fond of, taking
any opportunity to convey, "Angry", "Hates you" and so forth whenever the
opportunity arises, with me having no idea if those have any semblance
to reality or how they possibly could. All they ever seem to do is
to add to their tangle of deadly 'what ifs' that they have already sewn.
They only bring pain, isolation and uncertainty. Of course, I've
made my own mistakes in isolating myself from those people along the way
too, partly in terms of frustration and partly by making mistakes through
sheer rashness and simple mindedness, but it certainly didn't happen in
a vaccuum.

In
fifty years or so, this little teaser from the Discovery Channel (who like
so many others in the creative media, decided to hop on the MC bandwagon
too - don't miss the 'train the monkey', 'let's meet bigfoot' and 'spread
the word' moments in the teaser) may wind up being considered the most
insidiously evil slogan of the new high-tech century. More likely,
considering the power of the technologies and creative media MC, there
is little chance of that ever happening at all. Knowing what I know
about creative media MC after twelve years of experience, to me it reads
roughly: 'Surrender your privacy and even your freedom of thought
to your shadow government (rendered unaccountable via transparent, technological
means and cultivated public misperceptions) and let it and its helpers
in the media do the babbling for you (under the cover of innuendo and oblique
suggestion, of course). And you shut the hell up either from fear
of reprisal or the simple uselessness of trying to convince an incredulous
public of a reality beyond their ability to grasp.

Of course, most people are going to read it about as one
might expect: 'Listen to what someone else beside yourself has to
say for a change' or 'Stop and learn something new'. But they don't
know what I know including what the Discovery Channel is up to with this
clever little teaser. They don't know that the moment of the guy
parachuting into a chasm is intended to mirror the man being tossed into
a bottomless pit from the film Heavy Metal (an image of which I briefly
included here at AFAFA). That sort of pulling aside the jacket to
reveal a gun hidden beneath is what MC is all about. Sounds fantastic,
but believe it or not, it's true.

While looking at media MC for a moment, the 'shining'
from the Steven King novel is probably a rough metaphor for the astounding
thought surveillance / thought injection technology being employed as part
of MC. The nude pictures on the wall of the black protagonist are
clearly a trigger. Another example of King's MC related work that
I can identify with confidence is the short film 'The lonesome death or
Jordy Verrill' from the film 'Creepshow' (based originally on his short
story 'Weeds') in which the Jordy Verrill character (a farmer - hint hint)
discovers a meteorite (that he thinks will pay off a loan - hint hint)
and tries to cool it with water (hint hint). It carries an alien
grass (hint hint) which grows everywhere (including on him - probably symbolic
of marijuana and the psychological dependency and laziness popularly and
somewhat erroneously associated with it). King, specializing in the
horror genre, probably takes on (to his credit) some of the real monsters
out there (for example the 'It' clown that presumably mirrors John Wayne
Gacy). Also of interest, in Kingdom Hospital, he decided to include
a tantric poet. 'Young teacher... the subject...' of an MC horror
writer's fantasy...

Thought surveillance (much less thought/imagery injection)
is an unnatural and dangerous tool. We were not built to have our
minds read, linked or manipulated directly, as is being included as a component
part of MC tactics/technology. As an example, in having my own thoughts
surveilled by hostile interrogators, I naturally find that I tend to wish
to resist ugly thoughts that occasionally pass through my mind in the normal
course of stream of thought (for example, the 'N' word - a word that occasionally
passes through your mind too, though you may never have been forced to
notice). If there were no critical/hostile surveillance presence,
the word would momentarily pass on its way within the chaos of stream of
thought and remain weak as a mental entity. But in simply knowing
that the critical/hostile presence is there, the urge to suppress the word
is much increased. Interestingly, I found that in seeking to suppress
it as it pops up in the course of conscious (but involuntary) thought,
the very act of suppressing it tends to fuel and grow it until it occurrs
more frequently, tormenting and embarassing me in the process. In
other words, what you might think would be a negative reinforcement can
represent a kind of positive reinforcement, since the workings of the brain
are not under the complete control of the conscious will and are to some
degree a collection of little semi-independent units. Fortunately,
I eventually found that by simply focusing on the word 'Man' when the word
would pop up turned out to be sufficient to drown it out and block it until
it faded and occurred less frequently. In any case, having one's
thoughts surveilled continuously (much less mocked, ridiculed and prattled
at) is dangerous, quite painful and the harm it can do should never be
underestimated. Ironically, being more or less forced internally
to fight ugly thoughts, appears to be one of the essential premises of
MC, much as I hate to admit it (i.e. 'the purity' from X-Files).
And no, I have never called black people that word and no one can come
forward with evidence that I have.

Don't mistake sincerity for racism. And don't allow
the network to lead you into thinking me a racist. I'm not.
I've had black friends in junior high and high school (which is saying
a lot in Upper East Tennessee), college (joined the only 'white' fraternity
in the forever backward fraternity system that even had a black brother
at all, who was the coolest of the whole bunch) and in the workplace.
And my father helped make it possible for Derrick Hord to go to UT on a
scholarship. And for the anti-semite theorists, I dated a Jewish
woman and I think Selma Blair is the cat's meow.

But not just ugly, vain, stupid, silly, dishonest, small,
ambitious, sexual or selfish thoughts are a source of pain while so exposed
(at least for a sensitive, self-conscious kind of person), but one can
be tormented over creative, imaginative and hopeful thoughts too, depending
very much on the arbitrary hostility of one's persecutors. You have
to have the freedom to fail before you can hope to succeed without a critical
eye observing every step towards a greater confidence in some endeavor.
Through the course of over ten years, I've heard ten thousand insults and
threats from persons unknown (or well covered) and virtually every personal
interest and endeavor mocked at some point or other, been reminded of the
same ancient, inconsequential mistakes ten thousand times. I have
also heard and seen a few compliments and commendations along the way.
Unfortunately, the same vehicles that provide such good cover for my persecutors
and ridiculers also tend to remove trust and confidence in anything they
attempt to convey and add a frustrating layer of vagueness and confusion.
Insults can be taken at face value. Compliments cannot. In
other words, achieving peace is a far more challenging endeavor than achieving
war. Having noone's eyes to look into to pin to an actual identity,
one tends to suspect tricks, traps, set-ups and cynicism everywhere (for
good reason). My experience hasn't made me a better person.
Quite the contrary, it has made me a more isolated, suspicious, less stable,
depressed, potentially violent sort of person. MC is, after all,
a kind of killing fields, a paranoia game, usually intended to quickly
thrust people into prison or psychiatry. MC tends to remove the 'human'
aspect entirely and was designed to disintegrate, destroy and capture trophies,
not integrate. Their attempts to modify it into any kind of 'hospital'
(assuming that's not just a media facade) are probably doomed to failure
for most. Healing, rehabilitation and beneficial change require more
than just pressure and require a human aspect that MC does not and probably
will never have, at least until it leaves its veil of secrecy and admits
its own existence within the larger and older American experiment.
I've seen it divide me from my own family and from the rest of the world.
And there's so much hate and intolerance within the network, many of its
devotees are quite happy with that outcome.

Can you build a huge, self-perpetuating culture of implication
about both extreme human behaviors (and include mention of far less extreme
human behaviors along the way) and imply their association with the leave-no-trace
surveillance and the social and technological harassments/tortures of the
game? Yes.

Can you do so without ever really offering to the public
any concrete facts all the while? Yes.

If you have the mainstream media involved in the 'righteous
enterprise' (in terms of mockingbird and otherwise), can you prevent any
mainstream news media disclosure perpetually, regardless of the little
difficult to manage and inconsequential byways of the media and internet,
the more so in an age of media consolidation? Yes.

Does most of the signing culture even know about the reality
of the central nervous system surveillance and manipulation technology
or do they get their information without knowing exactly how it was produced?
Who knows.

In being forever unprovable, can any number of unprovable
reports of attacks/persecutions using such means solidify into permanent,
erroneous public presumptions about delusion and schizophrenia? Yes.

Do people, having solved a modestly difficult puzzle,
tend to think that what they have uncovered is the whole truth behind the
puzzle? Yes.

Would that represent an ideal environment within which
a far right 'oligarchical collective' could operate on a more general basis
and convince via osmosis even more liberal types of the necessity of the
game and ? Yes.

If you possessed the extraordinary technological means
and wanted to exploit them with maximum effectiveness perpetually, would
you design their use in such a way? Probably.

Would any dare stand against or criticise it once it grows
beyond a certain social size? I wouldn't recommend doing so.

Would you be limited as to the number of people that some
of the methods could be applied to without the system flopping over into
the public domain and accountability? Yes.

Would you be practically unlimited in terms of the number
of people upon whom thought surveillance, induced headache/pain, programmed
dreaming and even thought steering that an uninformed person cannot be
certain were induced at all could be applied? Theoretically, yes,
although some modes of application (like bee stings) would have practical
limits in terms of too many people complaining in unison such that beyond
a certain number could stop the fact of it all from flopping over from
below the surface of public discourse to above it. And the media
signing suggesting the existence of those technologies might need to be
reduced or eliminated.

Could they be expected to pull back from the future use
of the media in terms of alluding to the technologies and focus more on
mockingbird instead, if they thought that those insinuations could endanger
the perpetual deniability of the game? Yes.

Could you ultimately take over the nation in some sense
with such means with the common denominator being leave-no-trace/deniability?
Astonishingly, the answer would appear to be a qualified yes. Some
bound and/or destroyed by the means themselves. Many others bound
by fear after coming to believe the hints in the media that they might
be next, if they should stray from the dictates of the far right.

Is now the time to press for public accountability about
the game before they learn from their mistakes and modify the game and
use of the media and the technologies to make the chance of proving its
existence only less likely in the future? I would say yes.

"In a thousand years, Winston..." could refraining from
the use of any means to check non-conservative and lawless behaviors lead
to a society that devolves back to the stone age as "O'Brien" implies?
Plausibly. In a thousand years, could the social and technological
aspects, forever held beyond accountability, ultimately lead to a society
thoroughly controlled by an 'oligarchical collective' and by fear that
pays no attention to accountability at all or those laws that are supposed
to limit the 'oligarchical collective', authority and the majority?
Apparently. In fact, that appears to be what is in the works.

Is there anything fantastical about anything said herein?
Only the technology of remote thought surveillance and central nervous
system manipulation and their sophistication, which, believe it or not,
are a stark reality, guarded just as jealously as you would expect them
to be.

Can and does the CIA foment societal upheavals in foreign
nations? Of course. Are all of its foreign political targets
corrupt bastards? Not necessarily. Can the intelligence/investigative
community foment domestic societal upheavals and movements too? Of
course.

Do I have some sin in my past (and present)? Yes.
Thus, I'm not surprised to have long been a major focus OF the signing
culture / fox hunt in the first place.

Considering the invisibility/unprovability of the means
of remote nervous system surveillance and manipulation, could those means
also be applied against innocents and/or generally politically problematic,
liberal leaning individuals and/or dissenting individuals without proper
legal justification as well? Yes.

Would those persons, confronted with an ultra-primed public
that could be expected to join the signing culture and continuously add
to its size spontaneously, ALSO find a brick wall to finding any help against
an attack (in addition to the burden of proof)? Yes.

Consider Dr. Alfred Webre who helped develop some of the
technological means for the government and was then attacked and thrust
aside using those very means (he's dead now). See the http://afafa.org
home page for more info on him. Would the government hire a corrupt
bastard in the first place to help develop such technologies? Probably
not. Think about Dr. David Allen (the guy who challenged the Bush
admin on the Iraq nuclear issue) who scribbled a note about 'numerous dark
actors' before his mysterious suicide. Was he a corrupt bastard?
Probably not.