1. The Trial Chamber is seised of the Prosecutorís confidential
Motion for Protective Measures, filed on 28 April 2000 ("Motion"). The
Prosecutor is requesting various protective measures in relation to this case.
The issues raised in the Motion, including the permissibility of the Prosecutor
disclosing redacted material to the Defence without prior leave from a Chamber,
are of general importance and are currently being considered by this Trial Chamber
in another case, Prosecutor v. Brdjanin and Talic (Case no. IT-99-36-PT)
("Brdjanin case"). The Trial Chamber therefore considers that the best
way to proceed in this case would be for the parties to await the forthcoming
decision on these matters in the Brdjanin case. Both parties will be
given another opportunity, should they consider it necessary, to add to the
Motion and to file a response, as the case may be, in light of the decision
in the Brdjanin case.

2. Accordingly, the Trial Chamber, pursuant to Rule 73 of
the Rules, HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

The Prosecutorís disclosure obligation under Rule 66 is stayed pending
the decision in the Brdjanin case.

The Prosecutor may, should she consider it necessary, add to her Motion
in light of the decision in the Brdjanin case within seven days of
that decision.

The Respondent may, if he wishes, file his response to the Motion within
fourteen days of the Brdjanin decision or fourteen days after the
Motion has been added to by the Prosecutor, whichever is the later.