Charles Batteux: The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle

James O. Young

Provides a window on the literature, painting, sculpture, and music of the eighteenth century

Will be an invaluable resource for anyone interested in the arts and history of ideas

Charles Batteux: The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle

James O. Young

Description

The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle (1746) by Charles Batteux was arguably the most influential work on aesthetics published in the eighteenth century. It influenced every major aesthetician in the second half of the century: Diderot, Herder, Hume, Kant, Lessing, Mendelssohn, and others either adopted his views or reacted against them. It is the work generally credited with establishing the modern system of the arts: poetry, painting, music, sculpture and dance. Batteux's book is also an invaluable aid to the interpretation of the arts of eighteenth century. And yet there has never been a complete or reliable translation of The Fine Arts into English. Now James O. Young, a leading contemporary philosopher of art, has provided an eminently readable and accurate translation. It is fully annotated and comes with a comprehensive introduction that identifies the figures who influenced Batteux and the writers who were, in turn, influenced by him. The introduction also discusses the ways in which The Fine Arts has continuing philosophical interest. In particular, Young demonstrates that Batteux's work is an important contribution to aesthetic cognitivism (the view that works of art contribute importantly to knowledge) and that Batteux made a significant contribution to understanding the expressiveness of music. This book will be of interest to everyone interested in the arts of the eighteenth century, French studies, the history of European ideas, and philosophy of art.

Charles Batteux: The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle

James O. Young

Table of Contents

AcknowledgementsTranslator's IntroductionEpistle DedicatoryPrefacePart One: Where we establish the nature of the arts by reference to the genius that produced them 1. Division and origin of the arts2. Genius is only able to produce the arts by imitation; what imitation is3. Genius must not imitate reality just as it is4. The state genius must be in to imitate belle nature5. On the manner in which the arts imitate6. Why eloquence and architecture differ from the other artsPart Two: Where we establish the principle of imitation by reference to nature and the laws of taste 1. What taste is2. The subject of taste can only be nature3. Evidence drawn from the history of taste4. The purpose of the laws of taste is to imitate belle nature5. Second general law of taste: belle nature must be imitated well6. There are particular rules for each artwork and taste finds them only in nature7. Conclusion I. There is only one general type of good taste, but several particular types8. Conclusion II: Since the arts are imitators of nature, they must be judged by comparison to it9. Conclusion III: Taste for nature and a taste for the arts being the same, there is only one taste that applies to everything, even to manners10. Conclusion IV: How it is important to form taste in a timely manner and how we should go about forming itPart Three: In which the principle of imitation is verified by its application to various arts Section One: Poeticalart consists in the imitation of belle nature1. Alternatives to the principle of imitation are refuted2. The divisions of poetry are found in [types of] imitation3. The general rules of poetical content are contained in the principle of imitation4. The rules of poetical style are contained in the imitation of belle nature5. All rules of epic poetry come from the principle of imitation6. On tragedy7. On comedy8. On pastoral poetry9. On fables10. On lyric poetrySection Two: On Painting Section Three: On Music and Dance 1. Gestures and tones of voice are the keys to understanding music and dance2. The emotions are the principal subject of music and dance3. All of music and dance must have a referent and a meaning4. The expressive qualities that music and dance must have5. On the union of the fine arts

Charles Batteux: The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle

James O. Young

Author Information

James O. Young is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Victoria. He is the author of four books: Global Anti-realism (1995), Art and Knowledge (2001), Cultural Appropriation and the Arts (2008), Critique of Pure Music (2014), and over 50 articles in refereed journals. He has edited the four volume collection, Aesthetics: The Critical Concepts (2005) and (with Conrad Brunk) The Ethics of Cultural Appropriation (2009). Another collection of essays, The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgements, is forthcoming from Oxford. He is Artistic Director of the Early Music Society of the Islands.

Charles Batteux: The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle

James O. Young

Reviews and Awards

"...the translation is a great success. It is both readable and, so far as I can tell with the aid of a French dictionary, highly accurate...Young has done a great service by providing this annotated translation." -- Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Online