[109-C1]
Consensus: Accept 8 Telugu fractions and sign for encoding in a
future version of the standard. [L2/06-351]

0C78 TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ZERO FOR ODD
POWERS OF FOUR
0C79 TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR
0C7A TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR
0C7B TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR
0C7C TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR
0C7D TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR
0C7E TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR
0C7F TELUGU SIGN TUUMU

[109-C2]
Consensus: Acccept U+0F6B TIBETAN LETTER KKA and U+0F6C TIBETAN
LETTER RRA for encoding in a future version of the standard. [L2/06-351]

[109-C3]
Consensus: Accept the 4 draught characters, 44 Mahjong game symbol
characters, and 100 domino characters for encoding in a future
version of the standard. [L2/06-351]

[109-A9]
Action Item for Asmus Freytag: Propose a disposition of the Unicode Technical Report #25: Unicode
Support for Mathematics data tables in line with the proposal in
L2/06-352
for the February 2007 UTC meeting.

Public Review Issue 75 - Math (B.11.1)

[109-A10] Action Item for Asmus Freytag,
Editorial Committee: If there are substantive changes, refresh
the Proposed Update Unicode
Technical Report #25: Unicode Support for Mathematics at least 1
month before the February 2007 UTC meeting.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Unicode (B.18)

[109-C10] Consensus: Add to the Unicode website
a new Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in Unicode page with
explanation and pointer to existing data. Unicode is pleased to host
this project. [L2/06-379]

[109-C11] Consensus: Authorize a Proposed Update Unicode Standard Annex
#15: Unicode Normalization Forms that defines a "normalization
process for stable strings" (NPSS). Table 11 is not part of the
process, but the use of Table 11 with some pre-4.1 implementations is
defined as part of a "restricted NPSS". [L2/06-350]

[109-A15] Action Item for Rick McGowan,
Editorial Committee: Draft and post a public review issue on giving
U+00B7 MIDDLE DOT the Other_ID_Continue property. The public review
issue should reference the discussion in section 5.1 of Unicode Standard Annex #31: Identifier and
Pattern Syntax. The publick review issue should close January
30, 2007. [L2/06-378]

[109-A16] Action Item for Rick McGowan: Respond
to the comment on Georgian case folding in L2/06-378.
See the Unicode Standard for details.

[109-A30] Action Item for Ken Whistler,
Editorial Committee: Update UCD.html with the rationale for changing
the bidi category of 0600..0603, 06DD from "AL" to "AN". See consensus 109-C15.

[109-A31] Action Item for Ken Whistler,
Editorial Committee: Update the data files required for changing the
bidi category of 0600..0603, 06DD from "AL" to "AN" in the next version
of the standard, as per consensus 109-C15.

[109-A35] Action Item for Rick McGowan:
Communicate with Kent Karlsson regarding the SI prefix characters. It
is an interesting concept but we need more information in order to act.
Also communicate regarding the numeric values for the 8 compatibility
ideographs. [L2/06-309R]

Properties - ZWJ/NJ in
Identifiers (B.14.6)

[109-C19] Consensus: Issue a public review issue
regarding use of ZWJ/ZWNJ in identifiers. [L2/06-353]

[109-A36] Action Item for Mark Davis, Eric
Muller, Editorial Committee: Create a public review issue on the use of
ZWJ/ZWNJ in identifiers. [L2/06-353]

[109-A37] Action Item for Rick McGowan: Post a
public review issue on the use of ZWJ/ZWNJ in identifiers, to close
January 30, 2007. See consensus 109-C19. [L2/06-353]

Properties -
Line-breaking Information (B.14.7)

[109-A38] Action Item for Asmus Freytag: Use the
information in L2/06-371
to propose linebreak property updates.

Properties - IRG (B.3)

[109-A39] Action Item for John Jenkins: Submit
the characters in L2/06-364
(including Lee's) to the IRG.

[109-A40] Action Item for John Jenkins: Submit
the characters in L2/06-365,
minus the Wenlin variants, to be registered as a variant collection.

[109-A41] Action Item for John Jenkins: Suggest
to Wenlin that they submit their variants from L2/06-365
to be registered as a variant collection.

INFITT (B.9)

[109-A42] Action Item for Lisa Moore, Michael
Kaplan: Invite representatives of the Government of Tamil Nadu to the
February 2007 UTC meeting.

[109-C20] Consensus: Prepare a liaison
document to the IETF with the following points:

The document An IDNA problem
in right-to-left scripts identifies the problem correctly.
However, we recommend an alternative solution of ignoring trailing
combining marks when performing the exclusion. [L2/06-341]

The UTC doesn't see a problem with decomposing U+05F0..U+05F2 in
stringprep. [L2/06-333]

The UTC disagrees with the statement in section 2.1.3 of the
document Proposed Issues and Changes
for IDNA - An Overview. The problem is that IDNA 2003 used an
ad-hoc approach and should have been based on Unicode character
properties. [L2/06-340]

The UTC is in favor of the approach taken in section 2.1.4 of Proposed Issues and Changes for IDNA - An
Overview in allowing Unicode 5.0 and future characters to be in
IDNs. [L2/06-340]

The UTC would like to see the protocol allow for the use of
Unicode characters for future versions with as quick a turn-around as
possible. This can be done by basing the protocol on
backwards-compatible Unicode properties, such as the definition of
Unicode identifiers. The UTC reaffirms its willingness to add and
maintain new properties for guaranteeing stability. [L2/06-340]

The UTC disagrees with the approach in section 4 of Proposed Issues and Changes for IDNA - An
Overview. To break backwards compatibility with the protocol
there must be a compelling reason. Any such changes must be shown to
solve a large majority of well-documented problems. [L2/06-340]

Section 4 of the document is a major break with in backwards
compatibility. A compelling case must be made, and this case has not
been made. [L2/06-340]

[109-A43] Action Item for Michel Suignard, Mark
Davis: Create a liaison document based on the comments in consensus 109-C20.

[109-C21] Consensus: Include the following in
the IETF liaison document:

Call to the attention of the authors of The Unicode Codepoints and IDN that
the Unicode Consortium already recommends a restriction of codepoints
for the purpose of identifiers in Unicode
Standard Annex #31: Identifier and Pattern Syntax, plus further
additions and restrictions in Unicode
Technical Standard #39: Unicode Security Mechanisms under [IMOD]
and discussed in Section 3.1. [L2/06-342]

[109-A44] Action Item for Cary Karp, Lisa Moore:
Set up future communications between IETF and UTC by meetings and
e-mail.

[109-A57] Action Item for Michael Everson:
Produce an updated version of proposal L2/06-345
to show all 4 forms for each of the proposed characters. Also, change
the name of U+0616 to "ARABIC SMALL HIGH LIGATURE ALEF WITH LAM WITH
YEH".

[109-A65] Action Item for Michel Suignard, Mark
Davis: Add to the appropriate data file the four Qur'anic Arabic
characters 0617..061A which must be classified as confusables for
domain names. [L2/06-358]

[109-A70] Action Item for Ken Whistler: Update
annotation of U+0478 and U+0479 to explain their ambiguity and their
relationship to the newly encoded "Uk" from L2/06-357.

[109-C32] Consensus: Accept in principle the
encoding the first 2 columns of Cyrillic characters in L2/06-359
without change. The author should resubmit this proposal with the
deletion of characters xx20 and xx22, and a new code position for xx25
(in an area with other non-spacing marks). Also remove xx27 and xx28
from the proposal before resubmitting.

[109-A71] Action Item for Ken Whistler: Add an
annotation to U+033E COMBINING VERTICAL TILDE indicating that it is the
paerok and isn't for palatalization.

[109-A72] Action Item for Eric Muller: Get the
original Birnbaum document from Joe Becker and additional information
that puts it in context. Add that document to the document register.

Scripts - Devanagari (C.22)

[109-A73] Action Item for Swaran Lata: Engage in
more discussion on the proposed additional Devanagari characters in
India and return to UTC with the results. [L2/06-373]

[109-A77] Action Item for Michael Kaplan:
Respond to the proposer of 18 additional Telegu characters that some
characters are already in FPDAM 3 and these should not be disturbed.
The remainder can be resubmitted at another time. Putting fractions
into a separate block won't work because some are already encoded
elsewhere. [L2/06-267]