Washington state legislators introduce NDAA nullification bill

(Jan. 30, 2012) – With the introduction of the Washington State Preservation of Liberty Act, Evergreen State legislators have the opportunity to exercise their right and duty, and interpose on behalf of their citizens to halt a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of federal power.

Five Washington state representatives introduced HB 2759 on Tuesday. The bill condemns the unlawful detention of United States citizens and lawful resident aliens under the National Defense Authorization Act, and forbids “any state employee, member of the Washington National Guard or any agent of a corporation doing business with the state” to cooperate in the federal detainment or investigation of a U.S. citizen or resident alien.

It also prohibits the United States military from conducting within the boundaries of the state of Washington, an investigation or detainment of a United States citizen or lawful resident alien located within the state of Washington, except for a few narrowly prescribed circumstances.

The bill meticulously makes its case, asserting that the NDAA leaves the door open for indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without due process, violating the U.S. Constitution. While the language of the bill acknowledges the danger of terrorism, it insists protecting Americans cannot come at the expense of their constitutionally protected rights.

It is indisputable that the threat of terrorism is real, and that the full force of appropriate, and constitutional, law must be used to defeat this threat. However, winning the war against terror cannot come at the great expense of eviscerating the unalienable rights recognized by and protected in the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the state of Washington. Indeed, undermining those constitutional rights serves only to concede to the terrorists’ demands of changing the fabric of what has made the United States of America a republic granting the greatest number of people the greatest amount of liberty, justice, security, opportunity, prosperity, happiness, peace, and good ever known or experienced by humankind throughout the history of the world.

The detention provisions in the NDAA are vague, overbroad and open to interpretation. Pres. Obama tacitly acknowledged detention power exists when he promised not to exercise it in his signing statement. That leaves Americans to trust in the good character and moral clarity of Obama, Rick Santorum or whoever happens to reside in the White House to protect them from abuse of detention power.

Washington lawmakers have the opportunity to stand in the gap and ensure their citizens will not find themselves subject to the capricious whims of federal agents. By taking a stand, Washington can join those heroic state officials who stood up against federal power to protect black citizens in the waning years of slavery. In the 1840s and 1850s state and local governments in northern states stepped in and thwarted the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Acts, which allowed the federal government to arrest and detain black people, and send them back into slavery with little or no due process. NDAA has the potential to become the Fugitive Slave Act of the 21st century, and it once again falls upon the states to protect the rights and liberties of their citizens.

Washington joins Virginia and Tennessee considering legislation to nullify NDAA detention provisions, and sources close to the Tenth Amendment Center indicate several other states will soon follow suit. These states join several local governments that have also taken a stand against unconstitutional detention of American citizens.

And honest answer to that is I have not read all you posted since I am ready 3 projects already. If you asking am I in favor of impeaching the idiot you will find no opposition from me. If you want me to help you I am flooded right now on things I am not willing to let go. It seems others want my assistance also. That is my answer for now until I can read all you post and you post a LOT! I keep wondering where you get all this time?

Wherefore, the people of USA place the President under citizens arrest, if it applies, and he is a citizen. Only two ways this can be decided.

A.

His Birth Certificate and SSA# is legit, then he is impeached for the Heresy, Sedition, and Treason charges.

B.

He is not a US citizen, then he is not charged for Treason, because of that fact, and cannot be charged as a Domestic Terrorist. HOWEVER, he can be charged for Fraud, Terrorist In the US Government Hoses by acting without Congressional Approval, with the declaration of war on Libya, and Identity Theft, with other charges specified herein, such as Social Security Fraud, and ID Theft. So, which shall it be? One way or the other, he is either Impeached, or the US Constitution plainly states, those who don’t uphold the law, can also be Impeached for Sedition, Conspiracy, and Heresy.

Therefore, once all these things have been set straight, we can return our suspended Space Exploration, and get the economy back on track. Pay the countries what we owe. If you add the cost of each and every FEMA Camp, the evil execution devices, etc. We could have been out of debt on our deficit by now. I pray that Congress, who wasn’t happy when the president overstepped his power to declare war on Libya, will now finally see the light, as spoken by the people, for the people, and from the people. Thus, WE charge the Speaker of the House, to abide, and uphold the Constitutional Amendments, Bill Of Rights, and the Rules Of impeachment. God bless America.

Furthermore, from a reliable source and member of the 10th Amendment Organization; the following evidence also shows the following:

“the school transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship”

Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?

“Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A: Yes, by his own admission. Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport, that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. If you don’t care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this, and then lower your American Flag to half-staff, because the U.S. Constitution is already on life-support, and won’t survive much longer .”

Furthermore, from a reliable source and member of the 10th Amendment Organization; the following evidence also shows the following:

“the school transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship”

Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?

“Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A: Yes, by his own admission. Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport, that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. If you don’t care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this, and then lower your American Flag to half-staff, because the U.S. Constitution is already on life-support, and won’t survive much longer .”

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their

jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The plots of those not executed of the first 50% of the Yellow FEMA List, be a violation of this amendment, as shown by Arial Photos of where the enslavement of the American people with implanted RFID Chips would be working.

Amendment 25 – Presidential Disability and Succession.

Ratified 2/10/1967.Note History

1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

That in conclusion, lest the House of the Senate, Congress, and also be corrupted, with the plans of wanting a New World order; then the US Constitution be upheld, as so set by our founding forefathers; and that those in the DHA, FEMA, the President who’s is suspected of being a Domestic Terrorist for personal gain of power, and corruption of the economy and Humanitarian rights o the world, be found guilty of treason, and impeached, and those guilty of treason be so executed and put to death, as stated in the laws of the United States Constitution; where by the VP forthwith, shall assume the duties of the President till the next election.

Updated Additional Charges as of February 3rd, 2012:

Obama’s White House Social Security number 042-68-XXXX that was reportedly issued by the State of Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 to a French immigrant, Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890. As a US Senator, Obama used an entirely different Social Security number 282-90-XXXX.

Michelle Obama, who is a natural born US citizen uses this Social Security number 282-88-XXXX, but used this one 350-60-XXXX when she lived at 5046 Greenwood Avenue in Chicago in Aug. of 2005, about three years or more before taking up residency in the White House.

In December, 1981, when Congress passed the Omnibus Reconciliation Act to restore minimum benefits under the Social Security Act of 1981, it added a provision that made it a federal felony for anyone to “…willfully, knowingly, and with intent to deceive the Commissioner of Social Security as to his true identity (or the true identity of any other person) [furnish] or cause to be furnished false information to the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to any information required by the Commissioner of Social Security in connection with the establishment and maintenance of records provided for in section 405(c)(2) of this title.”

Identify theft is a class C felony. Class C felonies, depending on the State in which the crime is committed, carries prison sentences from 10 up to 40 years.

This also includes, failure to appear and answer to a Subpoena of Georgia State

Ordering attorney to not appear to keep fraudulent Birth Certificate and S.S.A. Number from being presented in testimony, with Obama’s attorney representing any defense that the imposter would have. Thus, by the view of the courts, people of Georgia State, and the Citizens of USA; he has no defense, and has broken numerous laws of Identity Theft.

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

To maintain, and uphold the 11th Amendment and order foreigners to leave the USA NOW; and that FEMA Camps be demolished, and those who planned it, be terminated from offices such as Dept. Of Home Land security; FEMA, powers granted under the illegal executive orders be stripped, and those illegal orders be forever abolished, as no findings in either US Constitution, Bill Of rights, or Declaration of Independence, shows where the Executive Orders are legal. And that the HR Orders supporting FEAM Camps, Coffins, guillotines, gas cambers and FEMA Cars, be forever suspended, and that the Sections 1021 & 1022, be forever suspended, and that all FEMA Coffins be melted down and recycled; all guillotines be removed totaling 800+, be broken down, and melted completely in such furnaces found in a steel factory. That public apologies be extended to each country for the Satanic plots against them, and apologies be made to the American people, for plotting mass murder, as so planned under the illegal executive orders, and by the constructed sadistic and satanic tools specified herein, and throughout this petition.

11th Amendment

The

11th Amendment came about as a direct result of the Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v Georgia (2 U.S. 419) in 1793 (see the Events Page for details). Congress felt that the Supreme Court had over stepped its bounds, and feared it would do so again unless prohibited by the Constitution. The Chisholm case was decided in 1793, just five years after the adoption of the Constitution. The Amendment was approved by Congress on March 4, 1794, and ratified on February 7, 1795 (340 days). The Amendment limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts to automatically hear cases brought against a state by the citizens of another state. Later interpretations have expanded this to include citizens of the state being sued, as well.

In Hollingsworth v Virginia (3 USC 378 [1798]), the passage and ratification of the 11th was challenged for two reasons. First because the President did not sign the amendment bill, and second because the amendment presented a situation where people had some legal relief before ratification that dried up

after, creating an ex post facto situation. The Supreme Court rejected both challenges, setting some important precedent for future amendments

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

The violation by signing Section 1021 & Section 1022; where by an American citizen sent to a FEMA Death Camp, if not executed by NAZI Style Gas Chamber, or guillotine, can remain for their natural life, even after a new US President is elected into office; whereby no due process of law, Miranda rights, or speedy trial with arraignment, or revealing the charges against the Americans Citizens who would be stake to said FENMA Death Camps, would be reviewed and as guaranteed the people in this Amendment

Plotting the rape of women and children, who are Christians, Saints, and Jews; who oppose the worshipping of Satan under the New World Order; of a new one world religion, known as the Luciferian Religion; and thus executed by FEMA Death Camp Gas Chambers, or guiltiness

Amendment 10 – Powers of the States and People.

Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

As guaranteed the people and by representation by a nominated representative of this petition, as stipulated in the 10th Amendment be not violated for having come forward with the charges against a President who has falsified forged birth certificates, based on suspicious of true birth origins, and with plots of evil mass murder against the people of our Nation and in violation of the Geneva Conventions Constitution, by invading countries like China, Russia, Iran, to repeat the HEW WORLD ORDER takeover, and thus murder the leaders of each of those countries, and murder their women and children; as that was what New World order means, Not a New USA Order; a New World Order. Hence, violates the UN Constitution, which was installed, so that the evils of WWI and Adolf Hitler, are NOT repeated.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The many attempts and as foreseen in Section 1021 and Section 1022; the militia breaking down civilians doors, on the same night as in the same manner described in the 1st Amendment violation, whereby the citizens rights to bear arms, shall be violated, by confiscating all hand guns, fire arms, bows and arrows, cross bows, or anything that is so decided, to be a weapon without due process and voter approval.

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure.

Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon PROBABLE CAUSE, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The violation as so premeditated by the New World Order, whereby personally owned firearms, property, agricultural goods on farms, and vehicles of any type are confiscated, without a warrant for search and seizure

Amendment 5 – Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings.

Ratified12/15/1791.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The plotting as stipulated in Amendment 5 is a violation by having the FEMA Camps ready to imprison any citizens of the Untied States who oppose the New World Order;

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The many attempts and as foreseen in Section 1021 and Section 1022; the militia breaking down civilians doors, on the same night as in the same manner described in the 1st Amendment violation, whereby the citizens rights to bear arms, shall be violated, by confiscating all hand guns, fire arms, bows and arrows, cross bows, or anything that is so decided, to be a weapon without due process and voter approval.

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure.

Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon PROBABLE CAUSE, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The violation as so premeditated by the New World Order, whereby personally owned firearms, property, agricultural goods on farms, and vehicles of any type are confiscated, without a warrant for search and seizure

Amendment 5 – Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings.

Ratified12/15/1791.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The plotting as stipulated in Amendment 5 is a violation by having the FEMA Camps ready to imprison any citizens of the Untied States who oppose the New World Order;

Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

To plot a New World Order, where by the US Constitution is permanently dismantled, and the New World Order installed after a declaration of Marital Law, whereby 2 weeks prior to the Martial law, military forces at 4AM shall for 2 weeks, break down the homes of Americans, and load them into FEMA Cars, and exterminate them immediately after being confirmed as a threat to the NWO plans on a FEMA Red List;

To plot after the declaration of Martial Law, whereby, under the New World Order, 2-6 weeks after Red Listed American people have been murdered by guillotine or gas chamber; the Blue List is then exterminated by same means, of torture, rape, and execution practices.

To plot the selective processing of the FEMA Yellow Listed Americans, where by children are sold as deviances to Satanic Churches and cults, to be molested, raped, and murdered as a sacrifice unto Satan, who is part of the NWO plan, to deny God of Heaven, burn the Bible, and take a Luciferian bible, and worship Satan as God, followed by the implantation of the evil ‘mark of the beast'; known as an RFID Chip, either in the forehead, or in either hand; and make 50% of the Yellow List work slave labor for all time, in FEMA Camps, located in Achorage and Fairbanks; both of which can hold over 2 million Ameircicans, for 34-35 cents per hour; while executing the rest as would be done to the Red and Blue Listed Americans, so that enslavement of the world is more controllable at 500,000, 000 than trying to enslave the entire current estimated population of 6.5 Billion.

And thereby installing a world wide, one religion of Lucferian Beliefs, with a Lucifer bible, one language, one world wide law, and one ruler of the whole planet over all countries and peoples of the world, as with the people of our great nations.

And thereby installing a world wide, one religion of Lucferian Beliefs, with a Lucifer bible, one language, one world wide law, and one ruler of the whole planet over all countries and peoples of the world, as with the people of our great nation.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

As rumored thorough cyber space the Birth Certificates or forgeries, due to a relative or friends, and those who know the president, of being a natural born citizen of Kenya, Africa; not of the Untied States of America.

Section 4 – Disqualification

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

That by signing the power of Section 1021 & Section 1022, is an act of Treason against the United States of America and the people; the continuation of preparing FEMA Camps for exterminating the people, for personal gain as stated on the classified Ten Commandments of the New World Order, where by the population of Planet earth is to be lowered from 6.5 Billion, to 500,000,000, and furthermore, inviting the countries of Vietnam, Korea, and Germany, or any other foreigner to train on American soil, to kill American Civilian Militia, should the constitutional rights of a separation from Union and Civil War result due to no resolve of the evil allowed, to dictate the future of the people and all humanity; for using tax payer funds to purchase and import over 800+ guillotines on American soil without voter approval, and thus making them classified, whereby the government can murder civilians if they learn the truth of these evil execution devices being all over the USA, on American Bases and FEMA Camps.

Treason:

treason n. the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of one’s country or of assisting its enemies in war Source: NMW

Wherefore, the following shall now be addressed for each investigation, as so dictated and prescribed by instruction, of the “Rules Of Impeachment”. The violations continue now, with the violations of the US Constitutional Amendments, and as backed by the Bill Of Rights, of which are as follows:

FEMA Detention Camps, without voter approval, and similar to NAZI Concentration camps, using Tax Payers funds; orders to mfg. and sock in Easter region of USA the FEMA Coffins without USA Approval; the mfg. of Auto Transports, which ordinarily are double deckers, are also triple deckers, often times stated to have shackles and hand cuffs, for transportation of the people to FEMA Camps, under declaration of Martial Law; prior to installation of a New World Order, and by means of suspending the US Constitution indefinitely, using tax payer funds; the sealing of old buildings that confirm railroad tracks leading inside, with gas lines, and new thermos gas tank’s installed, as it were in WWII and utilized by the Nazi’s during Adolf Hitler’s dictatorship, using tax payer funds; new chain link fences, with razor wire and new buildings, whereby the barbed wire and razor wire are pointed inward not to keep people out, but to keep imprisoned American Citizens from escaping, upon declaration of Martial Law, and dismantling the US Constitution; and contradicting the statement of not signing the Section 1021 & Section 1022, yet gave congress an ultimatum, if Congress didn’t sign it, thus making Congress sign the sections under suspicion of duress, which allows the people to be detained at said FEMA Death Camps, even after a new president were to be elected, without the privilege of arraignment for plea hearing, due process, or having been read the Miranda Rights.

FEMA Detention Camps, without voter approval, and similar to NAZI Concentration camps, using Tax Payers funds; orders to mfg. and sock in Easter region of USA the FEMA Coffins without USA Approval; the mfg. of Auto Transports, which ordinarily are double deckers, are also triple deckers, often times stated to have shackles and hand cuffs, for transportation of the people to FEMA Camps, under declaration of Martial Law; prior to installation of a New World Order, and by means of suspending the US Constitution indefinitely, using tax payer funds; the sealing of old buildings that confirm railroad tracks leading inside, with gas lines, and new thermos gas tank’s installed, as it were in WWII and utilized by the Nazi’s during Adolf Hitler’s dictatorship, using tax payer funds; new chain link fences, with razor wire and new buildings, whereby the barbed wire and razor wire are pointed inward not to keep people out, but to keep imprisoned American Citizens from escaping, upon declaration of Martial Law, and dismantling the US Constitution; and contradicting the statement of not signing the Section 1021 & Section 1022, yet gave congress an ultimatum, if Congress didn’t sign it, thus making Congress sign the sections under suspicion of duress, which allows the people to be detained at said FEMA Death Camps, even after a new president were to be elected, without the privilege of arraignment for plea hearing, due process, or having been read the Miranda Rights.

attainder n. The loss of all civil rights by a person sentenced for a serious crime.

[< OFr. attaindre, to convict] Source: AHD

In the context of the Constitution, a Bill of Attainder is meant to mean a bill that has a negative effect on a single person or group (for example, a fine or term of imprisonment). Originally, a Bill of Attainder sentenced an individual to death, though this detail is no longer required to have an enactment be ruled a Bill of Attainder.

HR 1955/S1959: all of which were sanctioned without the due process of voters approval, knowing and willfully were installed, due to the facts, the voters of America, would have deemed them a violation and voted them down.

Ex post facto

ex post facto adj. Formulated, enacted, or operating retroactively.

[Med Lat., from what is done afterwards] Source: AHD

In U.S. Constitutional Law, the definition of what is ex post facto is more limited. The first definition of what exactly constitutes an ex post facto law is found in Calder v Bull

(3 US 386 [1798]), in the opinion of Justice Chase:

1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action.

2d. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed.

3d. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.

4th. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.

attainder n. The loss of all civil rights by a person sentenced for a serious crime.

[< OFr. attaindre, to convict] Source: AHD

In the context of the Constitution, a Bill of Attainder is meant to mean a bill that has a negative effect on a single person or group (for example, a fine or term of imprisonment). Originally, a Bill of Attainder sentenced an individual to death, though this detail is no longer required to have an enactment be ruled a Bill of Attainder.

HR 1955/S1959: all of which were sanctioned without the due process of voters approval, knowing and willfully were installed, due to the facts, the voters of America, would have deemed them a violation and voted them down.

Ex post facto

ex post facto adj. Formulated, enacted, or operating retroactively.

[Med Lat., from what is done afterwards] Source: AHD

In U.S. Constitutional Law, the definition of what is ex post facto is more limited. The first definition of what exactly constitutes an ex post facto law is found in Calder v Bull

(3 US 386 [1798]), in the opinion of Justice Chase:

1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action.

2d. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed.

3d. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed.

4th. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.

And to help everyone out, here is the final copy, of the; “Petition Of Impeachment”.

WE THE PEOPLE, of the United States of America; from various territories and/or States of the Union, do hereby forward by representation of one such citizen, being of natural birth in the Continental United States of America, make this petition before the House of Congress, and pray that the issue of certain Constitutional Violations, and violations to the Amendments of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, be conducted in a hearing of Impeachment.

Wherefore, the following shall be addresses for each investigation, as so dictated and prescribed by instruction, of the; “Rules Of Impeachment”. The violations shall first start with that of the US Constitution, and followed by the Amendments, for with are as fellows:

Greetings Morgan. I just posted an update, regarding the finalised, Petition Of Impeachment, in accordance to the Federal Guidelines, known as Rules Of impeachment. And in such, includes all teh evidence and contributed facts that we have seem, heard, and some of us, in states like Georgia, have testified to, or witnessed personally. This is a simple decision based on a simple question. Are you “Fore” or “Against” my submitting the Petition Of Impeachment? the least we can do is try, and it cant be said, that we didnt, if all else fails. But, I wont submit anything, unless I get at least 2/3rds in favor or “Fore”. So, what is your vote, on submitting teh Petition to the Speaker Of The House?

Greetings soxin8. I just posted an update, regarding the finalised, Petition Of Impeachment, in accordance to the Federal Guidelines, known as Rules Of impeachment. And in such, includes all teh evidence and contributed facts that we have seem, heard, and some of us, in states like Georgia, have testified to, or witnessed personally. This is a simple decision based on a simple question. Are you “Fore” or “Against” my submitting the Petition Of Impeachment? the least we can do is try, and it cant be said, that we didnt, if all else fails. But, I wont submit anything, unless I get at least 2/3rds in favor or “Fore”. So, what is your vote, on submitting teh Petition to the Speaker Of The House?

Greetings William. I just posted an update, regarding the finalised, Petition Of Impeachment, in accordance to the Federal Guidelines, known as Rules Of impeachment. And in such, includes all teh evidence and contributed facts that we have seem, heard, and some of us, in states like Georgia, have testified to, or witnessed personally. This is a simple decision based on a simple question. Are you “Fore” or “Against” my submitting the Petition Of Impeachment? the least we can do is try, and it cant be said, that we didnt, if all else fails. But, I wont submit anything, unless I get at least 2/3rds in favor or “Fore”. So, what is your vote, on submitting teh Petition to the Speaker Of The House?

Greetings Michael. I just posted an update, regarding the finalised, Petition Of Impeachment, in accordance to the Federal Guidelines, known as Rules Of impeachment. And in such, includes all teh evidence and contributed facts that we have seem, heard, and some of us, in states like Georgia, have testified to, or witnessed personally. This is a simple decision based on a simple question. Are you “Fore” or “Against” my submitting the Petition Of Impeachment? the least we can do is try, and it cant be said, that we didnt, if all else fails. But, I wont submit anything, unless I get at least 2/3rds in favor or “Fore”. So, what is your vote, on submitting teh Petition to the Speaker Of The House?

Greetings William. I just posted an update, regarding the finalised, Petition Of Impeachment, in accordance to the Federal Guidelines, known as Rules Of impeachment. And in such, includes all teh evidence and contributed facts that we have seem, heard, and some of us, in states like Georgia, have testified to, or witnessed personally. This is a simple decision based on a simple question. Are you “Fore” or “Against” my submitting the Petition Of Impeachment? the least we can do is try, and it cant be said, that we didnt, if all else fails. But, I wont submit anything, unless I get at least 2/3rds in favor or “Fore”. So, what is your vote, on submitting teh Petition to the Speaker Of The House?

Since no one 2nded the motion, I shall contact each individual, that made posts. It will be for your vote of “For” or “Against”, in submitting the “Petition of Impeachment”. The time is of the essence. We dont want to sit around and, if President Obama is re-elected, wishing we had acted sooner, as the military kicks the doors down, rapes your wife and daughters, and we all goto FEMA Camps. You get me? So, all I need when I contact you, is a vote of “Fore” or “Against”, submitting the petition. I wont submit it, unless I get 2/3rds in favor, with a vote of “Fore”. Then, I shall exercise my rights to the media. As long as I am not breaking the State and Federal Laws, or threatening the Presidents life, I am NOT, breaking the laws, by exerciseing my rights, of ‘Freedom Of Speech’, and ‘Press’. I be in touch soon.

Thank you, for giving me the step-by-step instructions. Now, if there is someone else who introduced it, fine. They can have the credit. All I want, is what every citizen of WA wants; our Civil Liberties remaining in tact, and our Constitution Protected and Defended. I followed the encouraged instructions of the WA State Govorner, Gov. Gregoire, and contacted my local Senator and 2 Representatives, based on the region of where I live. Once they respond, and upon the Governors suggestion, I will attach the 3 Part Documents, to each one that responds. This is just to ensure, were not fed more malarky, as it appears we have been fed, at the Federal Level. I believe William Shake Spear said it best; “To Be, or Not To Be. That is the question.” Well, I intend to get the answer, as a Patriot, and Citizen of this great nation, and the State of Washington.

So, by sending my version, the Congress in WA State, will see; We The Washingtonians, mean business. I’ll have this printed and sent to the Congressional House of Olympia, WA soon; by the 10th, at the latest. I should also have the criminal charges finished, with the Petition to Impeach and arrest the Non-American; Terrorist, Traitor, Heressy & Sedition Criminal: printed about that same time. If you all are in supprt, and would like me to represent you, then it needs to be official, OR, if the chair of this organization wishes it, I can sent it to them, for final editing, so that it can be presented and addressed before the Speaker Of The House, in Washington, D.C. God Bless America, and the citizens who believe in the US Constitution. NOT, Satans-New World Order.

Section 2 of this act and are illegal within the boundaries of the state of (WASHINGTON);

SECTION 5. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (Revised Codes of Washington) Statutes as Section (37) of Title (23), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

1. Any public officer, employee, or agent of the State of (WASHINGTON), or any employee of a corporation providing services to the State of (WASHINTON) that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Section 4 of this act shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months or by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or both such fine and imprisonment;

2. Any official, agent, or employee of the government of the United States, or employee of a corporation providing services to the government of the United States that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Section 4 of this act shall be guilty of a class B felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than one (1) year, or a fine of not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment.

SECTION 6. This act shall take effect immediately upon approval by the Governor.

Section 2 of this act and are illegal within the boundaries of the state of (WASHINGTON);

SECTION 5. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (Revised Codes of Washington) Statutes as Section (37) of Title (23), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

1. Any public officer, employee, or agent of the State of (WASHINGTON), or any employee of a corporation providing services to the State of (WASHINTON) that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Section 4 of this act shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months or by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or both such fine and imprisonment;

2. Any official, agent, or employee of the government of the United States, or employee of a corporation providing services to the government of the United States that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Section 4 of this act shall be guilty of a class B felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than one (1) year, or a fine of not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment.

SECTION 6. This act shall take effect immediately upon approval by the Governor.

SECTION 4. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (Washington State) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1023), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

1 The State of (WASHINGTON) shall not provide material support or participate in any way with the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 within the boundaries of this state;

2. The Department of Public Safety is hereby directed to report to the Governor and the Legislature any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Federal Government to secure the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 through the operations of that or any other state department;

3. The indefinite detention, prosecution according to the law of war, and transfer to a foreign jurisdiction of citizens of the United States as provided for by Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 are in direct contravention to the limits on federal power as specified in

SECTION 4. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (Washington State) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1023), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

1 The State of (WASHINGTON) shall not provide material support or participate in any way with the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 within the boundaries of this state;

2. The Department of Public Safety is hereby directed to report to the Governor and the Legislature any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Federal Government to secure the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 through the operations of that or any other state department;

3. The indefinite detention, prosecution according to the law of war, and transfer to a foreign jurisdiction of citizens of the United States as provided for by Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 are in direct contravention to the limits on federal power as specified in

SECTION 3. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (State Of Washington) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1022X), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

The Legislature finds that:

1. Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 purports to assert the President’s authority to not only arrest suspected terrorists, but also to determine whether or not a trial, including what type of trial, will be held for those arrested;

2. Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 requires detention without trial by the military for a certain class of terrorist and authorizes but does not require the same for citizens of the United States;

3. The exemption for citizens of the United States in Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 only exempts citizens from a requirement and reads as follows, “The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States”;

4. The enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution, including but not limited to, those listed in Section 2 of this act.

SECTION 3. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (State Of Washington) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1022X), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

The Legislature finds that:

1. Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 purports to assert the President’s authority to not only arrest suspected terrorists, but also to determine whether or not a trial, including what type of trial, will be held for those arrested;

2. Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 requires detention without trial by the military for a certain class of terrorist and authorizes but does not require the same for citizens of the United States;

3. The exemption for citizens of the United States in Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 only exempts citizens from a requirement and reads as follows, “The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States”;

4. The enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution, including but not limited to, those listed in Section 2 of this act.

1. The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the United States Federal government is authorized to exercise only those powers delegated to it in the Constitution and nothing more. The guaranty of those limitations on federal power is a matter of contract between the state and people of (WASHINGTON) and the United States at of the time that the Constitution was agreed upon and adopted by (WASHINGTON) and the United States;

2. Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land provided that they are made in pursuance of the powers delegated to the federal government in the Constitution;

3. Article I Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it;

4(A). The First Amendment provides that the Congress of the United States shall make no law prohibiting the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;

4(B). The Fourth Amendment provides that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;

5. The Fifth Amendment provides that the People have a right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

6. The Sixth Amendment provides that the people have a right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to confront witnesses; to Counsel;

7. The Fourteenth Amendment provides that the people are to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law.

1. The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the United States Federal government is authorized to exercise only those powers delegated to it in the Constitution and nothing more. The guaranty of those limitations on federal power is a matter of contract between the state and people of (WASHINGTON) and the United States at of the time that the Constitution was agreed upon and adopted by (WASHINGTON) and the United States;

2. Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land provided that they are made in pursuance of the powers delegated to the federal government in the Constitution;

3. Article I Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it;

4(A). The First Amendment provides that the Congress of the United States shall make no law prohibiting the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;

4(B). The Fourth Amendment provides that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;

5. The Fifth Amendment provides that the People have a right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

6. The Sixth Amendment provides that the people have a right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to confront witnesses; to Counsel;

7. The Fourteenth Amendment provides that the people are to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law.

AN ACT relating to detainment without charge, military tribunals, and transfer to foreign jurisdictions of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens residing in the State of (STATE); creating the Liberty Preservation Act; providing legislative findings and declarations of authority; prohibiting state from providing material support for certain acts; prohibiting state participation in the implementation of certain acts; making certain acts unlawful; providing penalties; and providing an effective date. Be it Enacted by the People of the State of (WASHINGTON):

SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law not to be codified in (WASHINTON) Statutes reads as follows:

This act shall be known and may be cited as the “(WASHINGTON) Liberty Preservation Act”

SECTION 2. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (WASHINGTON) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1021X), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

The Legislature declares that the authority for this act is the following:

In conclusion, when the New World Order has made their foot hold, and those chosen to live, in the 500,000,000 have been implanted with the RFID Chips, (Mark Of The Beast as the huge computer is called also) they will work in the largest of the FEMA Camps, in either Anchorage or Fairbanks, Alaska, for either 34-35c per hour, of wages, while the corporations can live off murdered peoples lands, and property, and living for all time in luxury and wealth. That in itself, is a violation of the 13th Amendment.

But we have the opportunity here, to make history. In the 2nd part of the 13th Amendment, it states, that Congress of this great nation, has the power to enforce this Amendment, against such acts, just as the US Congress has the power, to charge anyone who is not an American, for Sedition, Heresy, and Treason against the people, our Constitution, and this great nation, The United States of America.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the secretary of state shall cause

notice of this resolution to be published at least four 31 times during the four weeks next preceding the scheduled session in every legal newspaper in the state.

If we can win World War II; the other wars that followed, and the Cold War: we CAN win the INFOWARS, and the attack on the American People’s Civil Rights and Liberties, before its too late.

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their

jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

IF we the people of Washington, don’t wake up and see the reality, then we are condoning mass rape, murder, and evil dictatorship, that wants to install a New World order, for the enslavement of humanity for all time, of those who don’t support the New World Order; as an evil way to lower Earths population down from 6.5 billion, to 500,000,000; in accordance to the Top Secret & Classified 10 Commandments of the New World Order, recently discovered about 2 years ago in Georgia State, USA.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Furthermore, it is the people rights in accordance to this amendment, to be made aware of any such laws like Section 1021, and be allowed their constitutional rights to vote on any said bill. Thus, the people exercise their rights, for this being shared with all states, with hopes that the Congressmen and Senate of each and every state, for those who draw up and submit on the behalf of safety and general welfare of the people who reside in their respective states; for us, it’s the Stat of Washington: and therefore exercise the 10th Amendment, to let the voters who are registered, vote on this resolution, to abolish the conflicting, Section 1021 that violates the US Constitution, with the Bill known as resolution 1021X.

Furthermore, Section 1021 violates the amendment where as, no citizen detained at said detention center built by FEMA will be exempt from any other cruel and unusual punishment prior to said evil execution, thus one can only imagine the evil that a person can get away with. Rape women, then chop their heads off. Or our children. To be detained without the rights of Due process, read our Miranda Rights, and not having disclosed on the night or day in question, of what the charges are; either at time of arrest, or by arraignment so that a plea f guilty or not guilty is entered: or detainment, if one is so lucky, where as they sit in the FEMA camp anywhere from 6 mos. To 4 years, before the government decides if that citizen is worthy enough for trial, or just terminate their life, so not to be bothered with their very existence, is cruel and unusual punishment.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Furthermore, Section 1021 violates the amendment where as, no citizen detained at said detention center built by FEMA (A FEMA Camp)would be allowed the right for arraignment to enter a plea of Guilty or not guilty, and hear disclosed information by a presiding judge, of what charges were believed, to have been justified, where as they were arrested, without hearing disclosed the charges, nor read their Miranda Rights upon being handcuffed and incarcerated in either the back of said police vehicle, or military troop transport truck.

According to the Section 1021 now enacted into Federal Law since New Years of 2012, as a gift to us, the American People; from the President: the other scenario is that whether current President is re-elected, or a new President is elected; all presidents of the future, can decide if the American Citizen is worthy enough to get a trial or simply be executed at the FEMA Camp, and secretly buried at one of many planned Mass Graves,(one already having been discovered as a super large one in the State Of Arizona Desert)in a FEMA Coffin stacked all over the Easter parts of The United States of America. In as such, the now enacted federal law of Section 1021, over rules the US Constitution, and does not allow the American Citizen, to confront the accusers, or witnesses of the accusers, for which they are unlawfully detained; thus violating another rights of the American Citizen to having he rights to confront accusers, at any given trial.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprivedof life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Section 1021 violates the 4th Amendment, in that; should the armed forces further act on orders from the President; by the enacted law of Section 1021, decide a citizen is a domestic terrorist, for what ever reason would otherwise not be known or disclosed to the general public

or the media; then those who don’t abide by the sworn oaths of 10 Order they will not follow; can by order of the President, and as allowed by Section 1021, transport at any time of day or night, said suspected US Citizens to a detention center built by FEMA (FEMA Camp,) where in the worst case scenario, are immediately exterminated without the rights of being read their rights; not received disclosed reasons for the arrest or what the charges would otherwise be held against them; without the rights of due process, or arraignment to enter a plea of gui9lty or not guilty; without the rights to a fair and impartial trail with a jury of their peers; without the rights to being informed of a death sentence, and that said death sentence would be from a device known as a guillotine, that the government has sworn armed forces to secrecy as being classified and top secret from the people, and the media.

Furthermore, Section 1021 violates the amendment where as, no citizen should be allowed to own or have in their possession any said vehicles as a mode of transportation; based on said Section 1021 enacted into law, where as the roads and highways of America would otherwise be shut down and check points put in various strategic locations, of those who try to flee from the scene of such illegal detainment and search/seizure practices that would be initiated, for anyone on a FEMA Red List, 2 weeks prior to the actual announcement of Martial Law. Thus, with vehicles and personal firearms, or other items that may be considered a weapon confiscated, Section 1021 excuses the rights of being compensated for the items being confiscated, whether for use by the enacting armed forces, or other legal officials following orders of the President, under a Martial Law, not otherwise announced, for at least 2 weeks till the pending FEMA Blue Listed Citizens are prepped for detainment.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Section 1021 violates the 4th Amendment, in that; should the armed forces, who chose to not uphold the sworn oath fo 10 orders they wouldn’t follow; and break a US Citizens door down, they would be allowed to search the premises, without the legal obligation of servicing the citizen, the Search Warrant for a; search and seizure of their home; for any/all personally owned firearms, bread knives, or what ever they decide to make up, for confiscation.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be

infringed.

Section 1021, violates this Amendment, so to disarm the American people and the citizens of WA State, in the event of Civil War; and/or self defense against tyranny of being broken into without due process, without Miranda Rights being read, without Writ Of Habeous Corpus and/or Search Warrant being required, and thus taken into custody, and transported at approx. 4:30AM on the first 2 weeks, PRIOR to the actual announcement of Martial Law, to a FEMA Detention Center.

According to the Section 1021, a detained citizen of America, and the State of Washington, could be incarcerated for up to 4 years, before ever being arraigned for entering a plea of guilty or not guilty; and that furthermore it would be at the pleasure of the US President, or another elected President, if such detained citizens should ever get a trial with juries of their peers, not to mention, the detainee would still have not had disclosed what the charges were that got them detained, upon arrest and incarceration without the rights of being read the Miranda Rights.

This applies to the Section 1021 signed into law by President Barrack Obama, in contradiction that he wouldn’t sign it, then deceived the US Congress, that if the Congressional House didn’t sign it, it would hold up certain military sanctions. After being deceived and signing it, the President then signed it, thus demonstrating that he willfully and arbitrarily, lied to the American people; though his excuse when confronted was, he wouldn’t use it or just ignore it. Yet that isn’t the point. The pint is, it violates the US Constitution, and the Amendments there of, that protect the US Citizens from unlawful detainment at the FEMA camps, that DO exist, the government says the opposite; only cause they call them Detention Centers. (If you compare photos, they closely resemble the same detention centers from World War II; known as NAZI Concentration Camps. The only difference is, these are more modern, compared to back then, yet the Top Secret/Classified Government imported Guillotines exist, as confirmed by a USMC Staff Sergeant, who went AWOL in fear of his life, due to exercising a sworn military oath, of 10 Orders he and the men in his unit would not follow. And that is, to detain Americans, and execute them, by guillotine, or leave shackled on double and triple decker FEMA cars that are made for transporting new cars from factories, which contain shackles, and hand cuffs, according to many eye witnesses across America. To this day, that Staff Sergeant and his sister from the USAF are still on the AWOL list, hiding in fear of their life, while most of the men, under the Staff Sergeants command, have been apprehended, and falsely imprisoned, for agreeing to not follow a presidential order, should the Martial Law be declared, for the purpose of installing a New World Order.

attainder n. The loss of all civil rights by a person sentenced for a serious crime. [< OFr. attaindre, to convict] Source: AHD

In the context of the Constitution, a Bill of Attainder is meant to mean a bill that has a negative effect on a single person or group (for example, a fine or term of imprisonment). Originally, a Bill of Attainder sentenced an individual to death, though this detail is no longer required to have an enactment be ruled a Bill of Attainder.

In U.S. Constitutional Law, the definition of what is ex post facto is more limited. The first definition of what exactly constitutes an ex post facto law is found in Calder v Bull (3 US 386 [1798]), in the opinion of Justice Chase:

1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2d. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3d. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4th. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.

government under the U.S. Constitution should be and also the role of the State Government in sending such actions. It is believed by both the few of WA State and the citizens of The united States of America, that we should follow suit, as did the first state to exercise constitutional rights, and protect the citizens from Sections 1021 & 1022; for which violates several US Constitutional Amendments, and the freedoms and rights of the American people as a whole. In the opinion of the “people”, it appears that this state is one of many states, whose awareness of such duties is lacking or is low.

This is the proposed Resolution; 1st of 2: known as Resolution 1021X.

X, refers to removal and not complying with any type of dictatorial practices, for which would otherwise violate the citizens rights of Due Process, Miranda Rights, Search Warrants prior to seizures, speed trial with legal rights for arraignments where as the accused can enter a plea of guilty or not guilty, and the Writ Of Habeous Corpus.

In review of the US Constitution and the proper role of Federal Government, it stems from the very foundations our forefathers set, to avoid and protect the Nation, and each and every state of the Union.

Thus, the constitution of The united States of America, makes it quite clear, as it is selected as appropriately applied in response to the Section 1021, for which President Barrack Obama claimed he wouldn’t sign, then lied to the American people and in counter diction to the US Congress, and by deception tactics, signed it anyways.

that the Legislature finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution; and

BE IT RESOLVED , That copies of this Resolution be immediately transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, each member of Congress from the State of (WASHINGTON) to the Honorable John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court; each justice on the United States Supreme Court; and the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of each state’s legislature.

C. Any public officer, employee, or agent of the State of (WASHINGTON), or any employee of a corporation providing services to the State of (WASHINGTON) that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Subsection 1 B of this act shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six (6) months or by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or both such fine and imprisonment;

the specific exclusion of application to United States citizens and lawful resident aliens contained in Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA, and the absence of such exclusion in Section 1021 of the NDAA, strongly implies that the provisions of Section 1021 are intended to apply to United States citizens and lawful resident aliens, whether or not they are captured in the United States;

*Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;

*The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;

*The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capitol crime until presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right confront witnesses;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;

*The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment;

*The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

WHEREAS,the members of this (Legislature, Town Council, County Government, etc..) have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of (Washington);

WHEREAS, this (Legislature, Town Council, County Government, etc..) opposes any and all rules, laws, regulations, bill language or executive orders, which amount to an overreach of the federal government and which effectively take away civil liberties;

WHEREAS, it is indisputable that the threat of terrorism is real, and that the full force of appropriate and constitutional law must be used to defeat this threat; however, winning the war against terror cannot come at the great expense of mitigating basic, fundamental, constitutional rights;

WHEREAS, undermining our own Constitutional rights serves only to concede to the terrorists’ demands of changing the fabric of what made the United States of America a country of freedom, liberty and opportunity.

Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA requires the Armed Forces of the United States to detain, pending disposition according to the Law of War, any person involved in, or whom provided substantial support to, terrorism or belligerent acts against the United States, and whom is a member of Al-Qaeda or an associated force;

WHEREAS, Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA specifically excludes United States citizens, and lawful resident aliens for conduct occurring within the United States, from its mandatory detention provisions;

WHEREAS, the Office of the President of the United States, under both the administrations of George W. Bush and Barak H. Obama, has asserted the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States;

WHEREAS , the United States Supreme Court has not decided whether the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States;

WHEREAS, unlike Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA, Section 1021 makes no specific exclusion for United States citizens and lawful resident aliens for conduct occurring within the United States;

WHEREAS, United States Senator Carl Levin declared in colloquy on the floor of the United States Senate that the original 2012 NDAA provided that section 1021 (then section 1031 prior to final drafting) specifically would not apply to United States citizens, but that the Office of the President of the United States had requested that such restriction be removed from the 2012 NDAA;

WHEREAS, United States Senator John McCain and United States Senator Lindsey Graham declared in colloquies on the floor of the United States Senate that Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA authorized the indefinite detention of United States Citizens captured within the United States by the Armed Forces of the United States;

the (Legislature, City Council, etc…) of the (State Of Washington), condemns in no uncertain terms Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as it purports to 1) repeal Posse Comitatus and authorize the President of the United States to utilize the Armed Forces of the United States to police United States citizens and lawful resident aliens within the United States of America, 2) indefinitely detain United States citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge until the end of hostilities authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, 3) subject American Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America to military tribunals, and 4) transfer American Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America to a foreign country or foreign entity; and

BE IT RESOLVED , that the Legislature finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON),

and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution; and

BE IT RESOLVED, That copies of this Resolution be immediately transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, each member of Congress from the State of (WASHINGTON) to the Honorable John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court; each justice on the United States Supreme Court; and the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of each state’s legislature.

B. The State of (WASHINGTON) shall not provide material support or participate in any way with the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 within the boundaries of this state. The Department of Public Safety is hereby directed to report to the Governor and the Legislature any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Federal Government to secure the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 through the operations of that or any other state department.

No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligations of contracts shall ever be passed.

>Article I Section 24’s

The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

>Article I Section 27’s

Treason against the state shall consist only in levying war against the state, or adhering to its enemies, or in giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or confession in open court.

>Article I Section 30’s The enumeration in this Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny others retained by the people.

>Article I Section 31’s

No standing army shall be kept up by this state in time of peace, and no soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of its owner, nor in time of war except in the manner prescribed by law.

>Article I Section 32’s

A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is essential to the security of individual right and the perpetuity of free government.

WHEREAS,

the members of this (Legislature, Town Council, County Government, etc..) have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of (WASHINGTON);

WHEREAS, this (Legislature, Town Council, County Government, etc..) opposes any and all rules, laws, regulations, bill language or executive orders, which amount to an overreach of the federal government and which effectively take away civil liberties;

WHEREAS, it is indisputable that the threat of terrorism is real, and that the full force of appropriate and constitutional law must be used to defeat this threat; however, winning the war against terror cannot come at the great expense of mitigating basic, fundamental, constitutional rights;

WHEREAS, undermining our own Constitutional rights serves only to concede to the terrorists’ demands of changing the fabric of what made the United States of America a country of freedom, liberty and opportunity.

There shall be no imprisonment for debt, except in cases of absconding debtors.

>Article I Section 18’s The military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.

>Article I Section 21’s The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, but the legislature may provide for a jury of any number less than twelve in courts not of record, and for a verdict by nine or more jurors in civil cases in any court of record, and for waiving of the jury in civil cases where the consent of the parties interested is given thereto.

>Article I Section 22’s

In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend in person, or by counsel, to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, to have a copy thereof, to testify in his own behalf, to meet the witnesses against him face to face, to have compulsory process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his own behalf, to have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed and the right to appeal in all cases: Provided, The route traversed by any railway coach, train or public conveyance, and the water traversed by any boat shall be criminal districts; and the jurisdiction of all public offenses committed on any such railway car, coach, train, boat or other public conveyance, or at any station or depot upon such route, shall be in any county through which the said car, coach, train, boat or other public conveyance may pass during the trip or voyage, or in which the trip or voyage may begin or terminate. In no instance shall any accused person before final judgment be compelled to advance money or fees to secure the rights herein guaranteed. [AMENDMENT 10, 1921 p 79 Section 1. Approved November, 1922.]

There shall be no imprisonment for debt, except in cases of absconding debtors.

>Article I Section 18’s The military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.

>Article I Section 21’s The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, but the legislature may provide for a jury of any number less than twelve in courts not of record, and for a verdict by nine or more jurors in civil cases in any court of record, and for waiving of the jury in civil cases where the consent of the parties interested is given thereto.

>Article I Section 22’s

In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend in person, or by counsel, to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, to have a copy thereof, to testify in his own behalf, to meet the witnesses against him face to face, to have compulsory process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his own behalf, to have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed and the right to appeal in all cases: Provided, The route traversed by any railway coach, train or public conveyance, and the water traversed by any boat shall be criminal districts; and the jurisdiction of all public offenses committed on any such railway car, coach, train, boat or other public conveyance, or at any station or depot upon such route, shall be in any county through which the said car, coach, train, boat or other public conveyance may pass during the trip or voyage, or in which the trip or voyage may begin or terminate. In no instance shall any accused person before final judgment be compelled to advance money or fees to secure the rights herein guaranteed. [AMENDMENT 10, 1921 p 79 Section 1. Approved November, 1922.]

Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as it purports to authorize, 1) detainment of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge or trial, 2) military tribunals for United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America, and 3) the transfer of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America to foreign jurisdictions, is repugnant to the following rights enshrined in the (STATE) Constitution: (NOTE – AS WRITTEN FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. ENTER RELEVANT SECTIONS FROM YOUR STATE BELOW)

>Article I Section 2’s

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land. Article I Section 3’s No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. Article I Section 4’s The right of petition and of the people peaceably to assemble for the common good shall never be abridged.

>Article I Section 5’s

Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right.

>Article I, Section 7’s

No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.

>Article I Section 10’s

Justice in all cases shall be administered openly, and without unnecessary delay.

>Article I Section 12’s No law shall be passed granting to any citizen, class of citizens, or corporation other than municipal, privileges or immunities which upon the same terms shall not equally belong to all citizens, or corporations.

>Article I Section 13’s

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety requires it.

>Article I Section 15’s No conviction shall work corruption of blood, nor forfeiture of estate.

>Article I Section 16’s Private property shall not be taken for private use, except for private ways of necessity, and for drains, flumes, or ditches on or across the lands of others for agricultural, domestic, or sanitary purposes. No private property shall be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation having been first made, or paid into court for the owner, and no right-of-way shall be appropriated to the use of any corporation other than municipal until full compensation therefore be first made in money, or ascertained and paid into court for the owner, irrespective of any benefit from any improvement proposed by such corporation, which compensation shall be ascertained by a jury, unless a jury be waived, as in other civil cases in courts of record, in the manner prescribed by law. Whenever an attempt is made to take private property for a use alleged to be public, the question whether the contemplated use be really public shall be a judicial question, and determined as such, without regard to any legislative assertion that the use is public: Provided, That the taking of private property by the state for land reclamation and settlement purposes is hereby declared to be for public use. [AMENDMENT 9, 1919 p 385 Section 1. Approved November, 1920.]

Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as it purports to authorize, 1) detainment of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge, 2) military tribunals for United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America, and 3) the transfer of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America to foreign jurisdictions, is violative of the following rights enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America;

*Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;

*The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;

*The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capitol crime until presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right confront witnesses;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;

*The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment;

*The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as it purports to authorize, 1) detainment of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge, 2) military tribunals for United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America, and 3) the transfer of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America to foreign jurisdictions, is violative of the following rights enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America;

*Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;

*The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;

*The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capitol crime until presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right confront witnesses;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;

*The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment;

*The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

, the United States Supreme Court has not decided whether the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States;

WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA purports enlarge the scope of the those persons the Office of the President may indefinitely detain beyond those responsible for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and those who harbored them, as purportedly authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists, to now include “[a] person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces;”

WHEREAS, United States Senator Carl Levin declared in colloquy on the floor of the United States Senate that the original 2012 NDAA provided that section 1021 (then section 1031 prior to final drafting) specifically would not apply to United States citizens, but that the Office of the President of the United States had requested that such restriction be removed from the 2012 NDAA;

WHEREAS, United States Senator John McCain and United States Senator Lindsey Graham declared in colloquies on the floor of the United States Senate that Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA authorized the indefinite detention of United States Citizens captured within the United States by the Armed Forces of the United States;

WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA purports to authorize, but does not require, the President of the United States to utilize the armed forces of the United States to detain persons the President suspects were part of, or substantially supported, al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces;

WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA purports to authorize, but does not require, the President of the United States, through the Armed Forces of the United States, to dispose of such detained persons according to the Law of War, which may include but is not limited to: (1) indefinite detention without charge or trial until the end of hostilities authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists, 2001 P.L. 107-40, (2) prosecution through a Military Commission, or (3) transfer to a foreign country or foreign entity.

WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA seeks to preserve existing law and authorities pertaining to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, and any other person captured in the United States, but does not specify what such existing law or authorities are;

WHEREAS, the Office of the President of the United States, under both the administrations of George W. Bush and Barak H. Obama, has asserted the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States;

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the “Liberty Preservation Act.”

A. 1. The Legislature finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution.

2. The Legislature finds that, together, Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, as they purport to authorize 1) detainment of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge, 2) military tribunals for United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America, and 3) the transfer of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America to foreign jurisdictions, are violative of the following rights enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America;

*Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;

*The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;

*The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capitol crime until presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury;

*The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right confront witnesses;

*The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;

*The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment;

*The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;

Thats good. I’ll submit my version just incase though. This is my version of teh NDAA Nullificfation Bill.

{Notice 1-3}

SENATE JOINT Liberty Preservation Act~Noncompliance

State of Washington 61st Legislature 2012 Regular Session

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

This bill prohibits all public officers, agents, and employees of the State of (STATE) from providing material support or participating in the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

HIGHLIGHTED PROVISIONS

This bill:

prohibits all public officers, agents, and employees of the State of (STATE) from providing material support or participating in the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012; and makes it a class A misdemeanor for a person to provide material support or participate in the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

Opposing indefinite detention is a positive first step, but who is holding the FBI accountable for their violations of the constitution? The media and civil liberties groups are not. You can only read my story with a search for “New police weapon against homeless” and also “Historic coverup of FBI and police crimes currently taking place”. More details are available if I received an email at soxin8@hotmail.com Bill Anderson