As Al Pacino says in the GODFATHER films, "Just when I thought I
was out, they pull me back in." Well, not really, but events
occurred that reminded me that I had a little more to say about
canine intelligence. I will tell you what got me thinking about
it. Evelyn cooked a turkey and we had it for dinner, then had a
refrigerator full of leftovers. The next day I took some leftover
turkey meat and next to it was a dish of stuffing. So I took a
couple of spoonfuls with the turkey. This stuffing was OK, but it
was not as good as I was hoping. It seemed a little strange that
it was still in cubes if I gave it any thought at all. A little
while later Evelyn mentioned that she still had some stuffing in
the refrigerator to cook up. Well this did strike me as odd since
first of all the turkey had been deconstructed the previous
evening. I did the deed, so I know. How does one have uncooked
stuffing the next day. What does one stuff with it? Well, she
cooks up some outside of the turkey. It is stuffing that never had
and never would stuff anything, but we still call it "stuffing." I
realized that it is not just dogs who desperately try to figure out
human society and try to function in it. It is a fairly constant
condition for many of us humans. None of us really knows the
rules. That is because no one source makes up the rules.
Everybody makes up his or her own rules. And we drift around in
and out of sets of rules. I probably was supposed to know that
when Evelyn makes a turkey, that there are two kinds of stuffing
that she makes and that even long after the turkey no longer exists
as a unified whole, there is still stuffing that has not yet been
prepared to eat. This runs counter to my intuition and is just a
fact that has to be learned. Some facts about a sphere of rules
are much more obvious than others. Any environment that one enters
has a lot of these spheres hanging around and as you enter them you
try to figure them out as quickly as you can manage. You just hope
that people in the spheres understand that you are confused and
want to help you. And about your best tool for figuring them out
is language.

Now when you are a dog--a situation I suspect the reader either
will never have to face or has already mastered-your language
skills are probably not as well- developed. I am sure that when a
human talks to a dog, the dog is thinking, "Now what the HECK does
this all mean? I am supposed to understand it or he wouldn't be
saying it to me. Now what does it mean?" And with a dog putting
himself under that sort of pressure you can bet that if the
intelligence is there, the dog will pick up human language skills.

In the last set of articles I suggested that barking is really a
dog's attempts at the verbal language he hears humans using, or as
close to it as the dog can make with his throat. I should have
mentioned that this idea of dogs trying to imitate humans is not so
fanciful as it might sound. There is a canine behavior that animal
behaviorists have said is an imitation of humans. When dogs are
around humans they like they will pull back the corners of their
mouths. I believe that they do it for humans and not for dogs.
Dogs do sometimes smile as a greeting to humans.

I would like to think that dogs are happy with the pact they have
made living with humans. I am not sure because so much of their
lives have become boredom. That has to be part of the reason a dog
sleeps so much of the time. The figure I heard is that an American
dog sleeps on the average 75% of its life. That means there is
much less continuity in how long the day is. A dog wakes up
several times a day and probably has a hard time of getting the
concept of whether it is morning or afternoon. That would depend
on how long he has slept. About the nastiest punishment you can
give a human is to put him in solitary confinement so he has nobody
to talk to. Dogs do communicate with humans, mostly collecting
information, but it cannot be as interesting as a human
conversation. There dogs in the wild have the edge. Writers like
Farley Mowat think that wild dogs have much more complex
conversation than we imagine with other dogs. And dogs talk on
very large networks. In NEVER CRY WOLF Mowat is out in the
northern wilderness and an Inuit tells him that a stranger was
coming and would arrive the following day. The prediction proves
to be true and when Mowat asks how the old Inuit knew, he founds
out he heard it in the howling of the wolves. Mowat does a sort of
double take on the implications, but wolves network complex
information with wolves at what must be great distances. (I may
have wrong some of the details of the anecdote, but the conclusion
is Mowat's.)