To thank you for completing these evaluation forms, we will hold a daily draw for a $25 Starbucks gift card. If you wish to enter, please indicate your name and email address. Winners will be announced on-site at the meeting and on social media.

Participation is optional; if you do not wish to participate, leave the following two fields blank.

One entry per session evaluated. Contact information will only be used for draw purposes. Survey responses are anonymous.

Question Title

*
1.Your Name

Question Title

*
2.Your Email Address

Question Title

*
3.Please rate this session as follows

Poor

Fair

Satisfactory

Good

Excellent

Scientific content of this presentation

Scientific content of this presentation Poor

Scientific content of this presentation Fair

Scientific content of this presentation Satisfactory

Scientific content of this presentation Good

Scientific content of this presentation Excellent

Usefulness/practicality of this presentation

Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Poor

Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Fair

Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Satisfactory

Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Good

Usefulness/practicality of this presentation Excellent

Adequate time for questions/discussion

Adequate time for questions/discussion Poor

Adequate time for questions/discussion Fair

Adequate time for questions/discussion Satisfactory

Adequate time for questions/discussion Good

Adequate time for questions/discussion Excellent

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Amol Verma

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Amol Verma Poor

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Amol Verma Fair

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Amol Verma Satisfactory

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Amol Verma Good

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Amol Verma Excellent

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Kieran Quinn

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Kieran Quinn Poor

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Kieran Quinn Fair

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Kieran Quinn Satisfactory

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Kieran Quinn Good

Speaker effectiveness: Dr. Kieran Quinn Excellent

Question Title

*
4.Session objectives were met

Not at all

Partially

Mostly

Completely

Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2017 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada

Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2017 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada Not at all

Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2017 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada Partially

Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2017 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada Mostly

Identify and summarize the findings of five papers published in 2017 that are highly relevant to internists and general internists in Canada Completely

Identify the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine

Identify the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine Not at all

Identify the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine Partially

Identify the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine Mostly

Identify the strengths and limitations of the papers using the principles of evidence-based medicine Completely

Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice

Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice Not at all

Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice Partially

Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice Mostly

Recognize the implications of these papers for one's own clinical practice Completely

Question Title

*
5.Bias and Balance

Yes

No

Unsure

The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced

The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Yes

The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced No

The content of this presentation was scientifically valid and balanced Unsure

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Yes

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias No

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue industry bias Unsure

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Yes

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias No

This session WAS FREE from indicators of undue personal/other bias Unsure

If you feel there were indicators of bias, please describe: (Note: Bias is defined as "a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest or a commercial interest.")

Question Title

*
6.Outcomes: As a result of attending this session, are you planning to