Focus

Bergoglio, the "Black Pope" Dressed in White

He governs the Church like a superior general of the Jesuits. He listens, but decides on his own. Even a McKinsey man has been called in to study the reform of the curia. Which Francis wants to purify from corruption and from the "gay lobby"

by Sandro Magister

ROME, June 13, 2013 - All that was lacking was a guru from McKinsey to design that reform of the curia which everyone expects from Pope Francis. And here he comes.

His name is Thomas von Mitschke-Collande, he is German and was the manager of the Munich branch of the most famous and mysterious company of managerial consulting in the world.

In matters of the Church, he knows his stuff. Last year he published a book with a title that was hardly reassuring: “Does the Church want to destroy itself? Facts and analyses presented by a business consultant.” The diocese of Berlin turned to him to get its accounts back in order, and the German episcopal conference asked him to draw up a plan to save on costs and personnel.

The proposal, which he welcomed enthusiastically, was made to him by Fr. Hans Langerdörfer, the powerful secretary of the German episcopal conference, a Jesuit.

Bergoglio is also a Jesuit, and by now his actions have made it clear that he intends to apply to the papacy the methods of governance typical of the Society of Jesus, where the superior general, nicknamed the “black pope,” has practically absolute power.

His reticence in attributing to himself the name of pope and his preference for calling himself as bishop of Rome have made champions of the democratization of the Church rejoice.

But theirs is a blunder. When Francis, on April 13, appointed eight cardinals “to advise him in the governance of the universal Church and to study a project for the revision of the Roman curia,” he selected them according to his own judgment.

If he had followed the suggestions of the preconclave,he would have found the “council of the crown” nice and ready. All he had to do was to call around himself the twelve cardinals, three for each continent, elected at the end of each synod and therefore of the last as well, in October of 2012. Elected by a secret vote and representative of the elite of the worldwide episcopate, containing almost all of the influential names of the last conclave: cardinals Timothy Dolan of New York, Odilo Scherer of São Paulo, Brazil, Christoph Schönborn of Vienna, Peter Erdö of Budapest, Luis Antonio Gokim Tagle of Manila.

But no. Pope Francis wanted his eight advisors to be chosen by himself alone, not by others. Called to answer only to him, not to an elective assembly as well.

He wanted one for each geographical area: Reinhard Marx for Europe, Sean Patrick O'Malley for North America, Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga for Central America, Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa for South America, Laurent Monsengwo Pasinya for Africa, Oswald Gracias for Asia, George Pell for Oceania, plus one from Rome, not of the curia strictly speaking but of Vatican City-State, the president of its governorate, Giuseppe Bertello.

Almost all of those chosen hold or have held executive positions in continental ecclesiastical institutions.

But this is exactly what happens in the Society of Jesus. Bergoglio was one of its provincial superiors and assimilated its style. In the leadership of the Society the assistants who surround the superior general, appointed by him, represent their respective geographical areas. The decisions are not made collegially. Only the superior general decides, with direct and immediate powers. The assistants do not need to agree with one another and with him; they advise the superior general one by one, in the greatest freedom.

One effect of this system upon the reform of the Roman curia announced by Pope Francis is that no commission of experts has been installed with the task of elaborating a unified and complete project.

The eight cardinals are asking separately for the contribution of persons they trust, of the most disparate profiles. In addition to the McKinsey man, at least a dozen of them have been consulted, from various countries.

Others have come forward of their own initiative, as for example Cardinal Francesco Coccoalmerio, president of the pontifical council for legislative texts, the designer of a project of reform centered upon a “moderator curiae" who would take care of the functioning of the machine.

In early October the eight will be gathered around the pope. They will deliver to him a sheaf of proposals. He will be the one to decide. Alone.

__________

This commentary was published in "L'Espresso" no. 24 of 2013, on newsstands as of June 14, on the opinion page entitled "Settimo cielo" entrusted to Sandro Magister.

In it pope Bergogio is said to have expressed himself as follows, with regard to the Roman curia and the group of cardinals to whom he has given the task of reforming it:

"Eh, yes, it is difficult. In the curia there are holy people, truly, there are holy people. But there also exists a current of corruption, it exists, it is true... There is talk of a 'gay lobby,' and it is true, it is there. We must study what we can do.

"The reform of the Roman curia is something that practically all of us cardinals asked for, in the congregations preceding the conclave. I asked for it too. I cannot do the reform myself, with all these problems of management. . . . I am very disorganized, I have never been good at this. But the cardinals of the commission will carry it forward. There is Rodríguez Maradiaga, who is Latin American, who is its head. There is also Errázuriz, both of them very determined. The one from Munich is also very determined. They will carry it forward.”

From the mouth of Pope Francis, these words made a great sensation. The Vatican's “gay lobby” of which “there is talk” is in essence a network of friendship and mutual support among homosexual prelates of the curia with the purpose of occupying and maintaining important positions. And it is believed to be among the objects of the secret report on the curia delivered to Benedict XVI - and by him to his successor - by cardinals Julián Herranz, Jozef Tomko, and Salvatore De Giorgi.

Fr. Federico Lombardi, director of the press office of the Holy See, when asked about the publication of the account of the audience with the CLAR, said: "It was a meeting of a private nature. I therefore have no statement to make on the contents of the conversation.”

For its part, the presidency of the CLAR has lamented the unauthorized publication of notes that “were intended for the personal records of the participants”:

With regard to McKinsey, it was also the professional training ground, between 1980 and 1984 in the branches of Milan and London, of Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, the previous president of the Institute for Works of Religion, IOR, the Vatican “bank.”

Also at McKinsey, between 1987 and 1989, was the banker Alessandro Profumo, the current president of Monte dei Paschi di Siena and the former administrator delegate of Unicredit, a friend of Gotti Tedeschi and author of the preface to the book “Spiriti animali. La concorrenza giusta," written by Gotti Tedeschi together with Alberto Mingardi, published by Università Bocconi in 2007.

__________

The idea of a "moderator curiae" launched by Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio: