Maglev Is Too Risky

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

December 31, 1991

AS AN engineer and scientist for the last 52 years, I consider the maglev train a wonderful invention. However, carrying people between Orlando International Airport and the tourist attractions is not the place for it.

The recent train accident near Palatka should awaken our public servants to the danger of high-speed train travel in populated areas. I also remember a freight train wreck in California not long ago that wiped out quite a few houses. These trains were probably going much less than 100 miles per hour. Think what would happen if a train going 250 to 300 miles per hour would leave the track. The promoters, of course, will claim it couldn't happen with their equipment, but nothing made or run by human beings doesn't occasionally fail - even space shuttles.

The half-billion dollar construction cost would be good for the local economy - if we make the doubtful assumption that none of our tax dollars will be used. The recovery of this investment in a reasonable time seems very iffy. Even 10 million riders a year at $10 per ride produces only $100 million, most of which will probably go for operating expenses. I would need a very big tax loss to put my money in this venture.

Let's stop this boondoggle before it goes too far and the taxpayers are stuck with a really big white elephant. This maglev train could make the taxpayer cost of supporting the Orlando bus system seem like peanuts.