Wordle-like Twitter screens for conference keynote presenters?

I’ve been at the PELeCON conference this week. After her keynote, Keri Facer mentioned in a couple of tweets that the Twitter wall being visible to the audience but not the speaker can be problematic. Everything was positive in Keri’s session, but this isn’t necessarily the case for everyone (see danah boyd example).

So it got me thinking about what I’d like, as a presenter, when doing a keynote. There’s lots of different reasons tweet about a session using the conference hashtag. For example:

To let those who aren’t there know what’s being said

To give a voice to the livestream audience (if applicable)

To provide links to what’s being discussed

For banter/puns/general merrymaking

For agreement, disagreement and questions

…and many more.

Whilst you’re presenting there’s no way you can keep up with the stream in the same way that you (potentially) can when in the audience. But it would be nice to know the gist of what people are saying in the backchannel.

Thinking about it, I casually remarked that some kind of Twitter screen in front of presenters would be useful. And if those tweets that had been retweeted (RT’d) several times could appear bigger, so much the better.

Chris Atherton mentioned this sounded a lot like Wordle and Pat Parslow riffed on the idea talking about the potential for sentiment analysis.

That idea look something like this with traffic light colours for sentiment:

The trouble is, that’s still too much to take in whilst you’re presenting. So, thinking some more, I reckon all that’s needed is the top three most RT’d tweets. Which would look something like this:

John Popham

I rremember the audience once bursting into laughter while I was presenting, and it wasn’t because I had said anything funny. I, of course, checked my flies, but then someone pointed out the amusing tweet on the screen behind me

daibarnes

Great idea Doug. TBH it might actually be fairer for this concept to be what is presented to the audience as well. In my relatively small conference experience, I’m a big fan of the back channel but not particularly the potential for public flogging or spam tweets. The back channel can be enlightening but having the *behind the presenter* display only showing tweets that have aggregated from audience (physical and virtual) reinforcement would lead to a more refined and pertinent feed. Tweets would only make it through via democratic support.

I was thinking the same. It also will help keep track of the most important bits of the backchannel conversation. The stream itself, for a popular conference, can be too overwhelming so some form of real-time extraction/summary would be good.

It’s also difficult to see the new content if you see the umpteenth retweet of something you’ve already read 😉

Emmadw

You’d need some pretty good AI though … that tweet you had from “thoughtful tweeter” could have been from “critical tweeter”, if the book referenced said that the speakers’ view point was a lot of rubbish.

zecool

Hall Davidson did his keynote at Saturday’s online Social Learning Summit, where he had prepared a couple of open-ended Q’s via polleverywhere, and we all saw the flow of answers. He then, on the spot, tried to generate a Wordle of these replies. Although quick and entertaining, he did have to copy-paste from his columns of answers to Word, then to Wordle and then, had to clean out some irrelevant info (ex. time of day). But you have to be a Hall Davidson to go out on a limb and do it this way. Personally, I’ll have screen #2 show the Twitter backchannel during my keynote, have someone I trust intercept issues or Q’s arising and relay them to all, at a couple of fixed moments. That way, I concentrate on my presentation, but can still use the backchannel as an added value for all.