33 comments:

Though there were a few more there the crowds are pretty embarrassing for the game at the venue. I think it's a culmination of things but I don't think the random draw helps one bit. People generally like to plan ahead and buy tickets for matches that they want to watch. With this format it isn't possible until the last minute. The format should be scrapped and whoever thought it was a good idea named and shamed. I can't remember a tournament with less atmosphere in living memory. The players must feel embarrassed getting the Rob Walker treatment (who also looks uncomfortable) then coming out to a ripple of claps and a snoring grandma. I'd also considering moving the tournament to another city, perhaps try somewhere like Liverpool which very seldom sees top class action and never a ranking event, close enough to Manchester / Lancashire to attract larger crowds and plenty of city centre venues.

I hope the overly enthusiastic MC doesn't cock up the open draw as he did last time when sensationalising the possibility of a Parrott/Davis clash and forgetting the claims of Parrott's opponent Ali Carter.All this did was to gee up Carter and demoralise JP before the first ball was struck.On a separate note, how a Parrott versus Davis match up would titilate anyone under the age of 90 is anyones guess.

That someone could dislike ROS to the point of wishing he doesn't pull the crowd is beyond me. The audience is dramatically low and the event has no sponsor. It can't be commercially profitable if nothing changes. I'd say it would be in real danger to be axed next year if it wasn't for the BBC. And even that wont last forever...Would that please you?

So Dave, what you are saying is that it's more likely to be the venue? I disagree with you on the format, while the last 32 was known a while ago, none of the matches really set the world alight and I think they should have started with 16 rather than 32 on one table. I'd be interested to know how many advance tickets for later on in the week are sold in comparison to other events.

The crowds last night were embarrsassing. Was it the Allen/McCulloch match on the other table last night? It looked like there was about 6 people at most watching them. If the crowds don't turn up it looks like this event will be the next one to be scrapped.

I still think if sessions aren't sold out, WS should give a few dozen tickets to the University and get extra people in. Used to be students would go anywhere to get in from the cold. Or is it that nobody knows the tournament is on?

I think it got off to a bad start with a clash against the Old Firm match on Saturday.

It's no contest in Glasgow between snooker and football, and the fans certainly wouldn't have been rushing from the football to sit in silence at the Grand Prix in the evening either, they were out painting the town green or blue!

It's also another case of too big a venue for this stage of the event. Newport suffers the same effect., vast amounts of seats and spectators often site a long way back so they can get a view of both tables, well out of sight of the tv cameras.

Personally I think the Grand Prix should go back to The Guild Hall at Preston and Scotland should have its own clearly marketable event - aka Scottish Open, like the Welsh Open.

I love Ronnie, but it is a worry that in the UK he carries most events until the last weekend. It is like Bolt in the Athletics who carries that sport at the moment. I agree the Guild Hall would be good or why not back to the SECC? Why is not there anyway?

I am very, very surprised about the way in which today's draw took place. This could have been easily faked (no, I am not saying it IS, but it COULD HAVE BEEN).

All balls were numbered, but who tells me that ball No. 1 actually represented Neil Robertson? Only Rob Walker did after looking on his list. He also could have said any other name after the lord picked the No. 1 ball and no one would have known. (Or did I miss something here? Was known in advance which number was which player?)

Why not put the player's names on the balls? Then there can't be any suspicion of a fixed draw.

Once again: I don't believe this draw is in any way fixed, but why do it in such a clumsy way (again...)?

Also Eric this has been a very poor tornament so far and what happens Higgins v o'sullivan came out in the draw, still o'sullivan had to win his match which he did, but as you say very clumsy draw. When this draw is made in the fa cup the teams come up on screen with the numbers on why was'nt it done today?

There you go, the wonders of the random draw: Higgins/O'Sullivan in round 2.This system is a mockery of things. And empty seats are another way to prove it.And, Anon 9.05, I hope O'Sullivan pulls the biggest crowds since the invention of the concept, because I can't believe that a genuine snooker fan would be so uninterested in the terrible situation the game is right now as to wish poor attendance at tournaments just because it suits their dislike.

Also, Eurosport is extracting the urine out of European snooker fans, by showing some U-19 football thingie in the time alloted for snooker. (No, I don't have the BBC. No, I will not pay for the Eurosport player since I already pay cable. Yes, there are other means. Ahem. And yes, that's another story. Sorry.)

the game is in trouble its obvious to me people know about the event cos its on the BBC and all they do is promote where the event is ,i think that people just think other players are boreing to watch and everyone wants to see ronnie , the simple fact is that i am sorry to say but the games becoming boreing ! Sorry if that seams harsh but thats my opinion

They should ask someone like Pat Mooney for help on advertising and such. Surely there is a way to do proper promotion. Next month we have a match in Copenhagen between Higgins and Selby. Almost all tickets, VIP and normal, were sold immediately on the first day. Now it is completely sold out. Thanks to eurosport and Henrik Kaj Hansen for getting the word out.

Well either way, fans would have spent their dosh out for that match and that would have cut out a large proportion of potential crowd on Sunday and no doubt had knock on effects to both Saturday and Monday.

Can someone please explain why the tournament was moved moved from the secc seeing as the crowds were so good? Anyway if they can't get big crowds in tomorrow afternoon ans thursday afternoon considering the matches on offer then the game is in big trouble.

The venue of the Kelvin Hall is central, definitely more central and accessible than the SECC but the week they have chosen is not the best one for scheduling. Also, the marketing has been very poor.

The Masters Club in Glasgow where John Higgins and Graeme Dott practiced regularly has also recently closed and people would often come in there to play and see leaflets for the events - the only main club left in Glasgow now is the Q Club (which I'm pleased about as the atmosphere and tables are good).

I think the SECC is undergoing major construction works currently and will be for a while for the 2014 commonwealth games in Glasgow as the National Scotland Arena will be built there.

But, why not Preston?

Personally I think the random draw is good - Those of you on TSF can listen to John Higgins opinions of it and he seems to like it. (perhaps that was before the draw!!)But, the draw leaves the potential for an all top 16 QF line up

Incidentally, it looks as though the BBC's coverage of the Hendry- Williams match will be severely disrupted by live coverage of David Cameron's conference speech.Meanwhile, BBC1 will be showing an ancient episode of Murder, She Wrote at the same time.

I think World Snooker want one tournament in Scotland and one in Wales, with sponsors or without. As these two tournaments are unsponsored WC will put up the money although surely they must rely on good ticket sales!

It's almost a game waiting for Hazel's latest excuse for empty seats each time it happens. And Clive Everton hinted that lack of atmosphere affected the standard of play in the Perry/Pinches match, which sounds like a vicious circle.