Hi George:I appreciate your good will, however, it is no fun repeating myself:Judge Yaffe was correct in refusing to disqualify, since the case - Marina v LA County, was not a case of the Superior Court in the first place, and it was not litigated pursuant to the law of California or the US. It was fraud to start out - a major real estate case, with Real Parties in Interest who were two large developers, privately held, and LA County - the payer of "not permitted" payments - as Defendant. It would have been bad business practice to run it under the True Court Track. It was diverted from the start to the Equity/Enterprise Track, just like the case of Barbara Darwish.Why don't we trade places:Please show me the evidence to support the notions implied in your message, which I explicitly stated below, and which I hold were false and misleading:________________________________________________1) The caption of Marina v LA County (BS109420) - in ancillary proceedings of which Richard Fine was taken away on March 4, 2009 by the Sheriff's Warrant Squad - was a matter litigated under the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, pursuant to the law of the State of California.2) Judge Yaffe was presiding in the caption of Marina v LA County (BS109420) as a Judge of the Superior Court of California, duly assigned to the case pursuant to the law of the State of California.________________________________________________Seems elementary to me... Any record you want! Proving me wrong on one of the two would be enough for me... Not trying to be stickler for perfection - half is enough :)... 50% would be considered passing grade...Until your prove me wrong - and I would be happy to be challenged - I claim that you distributed false and misleading information, which you should retract!Joe Zernik___________The offending statement is marked in red. At minimum you should have stated: "involved in the purported Richard Fine proceedings..."___________At 18:38 11/12/2009, you wrote:

After yesterday attending the hearings on judicial recusal, I suggest all parties involved in judicial reform take time to view the complete video on the House Judiciary website.

Maybe I was wrong, the testimony heard, both from the committee members themselves and the panel of guests invited, would indicate that the judges in California, involved in the Richard Fine proceedings should have recused themselves because they were being paid off by the county.

--- On Fri, 12/11/09, joseph zernik wrote:

From: joseph zernik

Subject: Request that US House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee initiate corrective actions in re: case of Ms Barbara Darwish

JOSEPH --This afternoon, the House passed a bill 223-to-202 tightening financial regulations and ensuring we put Main Street first....Best wishes,Jon VogelDCCC Executive Director-----------------------JON --You must be kidding...The hyperactivity of the Democrats-controlled US Congress in passing more and more bills fighting financial institution fraud appears as the manifestation of desperate lack of any impact, nothing more. Congress could use its time much more effectively in tightening oversight over the executive and judicial branches, law enforcement, banking regulators, and the courts...The first step in that direction would be enforcing the Rule Making Enabling Act28 USC 2071-2077 on PACER & CM/ECF (the dual docketing systems of the US Courts) - allegedly the largest Flimflam - Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind.

Show me the regulator who would enforce the law on Bank of America Corporation...

Show me the US court where I am permitted to exercise my right to file a complaint and sue Bank of America Corporation, Kenneth Lewis, and Sandor Samuels, for fraud and deceit, false claims, racketeering, and more... together with Kenneth Melson (US Dept of Justice) and Kenneth Kaiser (FBI) for collusion.

Check out the conduct of US Court in Washington, spitting distance from capitol, in Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) and the corrupt conduct of US Judge Richard J Leon in the case - Kozinski Fraud galore...

You really expect people to reward you with contributions for this futility? You must be deluded. You somehow remind me of Sandor Samuels fund raising for Bet Tzedek while perpetrating the heist of sub-prime lending...Best wishes,

Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice- as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.

Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.

Mark J. Sullivan, Director,US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.

Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

III. The UsualIN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

Subject: Request that US House of Representatives, Judiciary Committee initiate corrective actions in re: case of Ms Barbara Darwish

The favor of a response within 10 days was requested

TO MEMBERS OF THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUDICIARY COMMITTEE:

Copied below is my request for explanation by Joseph Lane, Clerk of the California Court of Appeals, 2nd District, regarding the case of Ms Barbara Darwish. Like the case of Attorney Richard Fine, it was a real estate matter. The case of Attorney Fine was best noted for the abduction and false imprisonment of Attorney Fine as part of the purported ancillary proceedings. The case of Ms Barbara Darwish was best noted as an example of alleged real estate fraud by the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, in collusion with the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District.

It was claimed that this type of conduct propelled Los Angeles County to be listed by the FBI as: "The epicenter of real estate and mortgage fraud". It was further alleged that conduct of the Los Angeles Superior Court in collusion with Countrywide and later - Bank of America, was also tightly tied to alleged criminality underlying the current economic/integrity crisis.

The case demonstrated the underlying deficiency - failure to establish process and procedures for publicly accountable validation/logic verification of large computer systems in government, in financial institutions, and in public corporations. It is the same deficiency - in large systems in the courts and in large financial institutions - operating in perfect harmony to defraud the American people - that underlies the current Economic/Integrity Crisis.

Allowing such conditions to stand amounted to serious deprivation of Human Rights of the people. In addition, such conditions inherently generate intolerable risks to financial markets in the US and beyond.

FBI and US Department of Justice refused to investigate complaints in this regard in the past three years, in disregard of overwhelming evidence of widespread corruption at the Los Angeles Courts and criminality at Countrywide and Bank of America.

Please initiate corrective actions pursuant to your duties and authority to restore the rights of Ms Barbara Darwish and all 10 million residents of Los Angeles County.

Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice - as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.

Other Inspector Generals - as an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.

Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As a request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.

Lee Baca, Los Angeles Sheriff, as a repeat request to access the warrants of RF and NR1 - to inspect and to copy.

III. The UsualIN SHORT - KOZINSKI MUST RESIGN!"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

TO CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEALS, 2ND DISTRICT, CLERK OF THE COURT JOSEPH LANE.

Dear Clerk Lane:

I spoke today by phone with Chief Deputy Danny Potter in re: Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737). The purported case of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, was reviewed twice by your court. The caption was represented by the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, as a true court case. However, review of the Registers of Actions [1] and other evidence revealed facts that were difficult to comprehend:a) Multiple judges presided in the case, none with an assignment order.b) All fees in this case were listed as "Journal Entry" whereas in true court cases such fees are listed as "Filing Fees", "Motion Fees", "Stipulation Fees", etc. John Clarke- Clerk, and Charles McCoy- Presiding Judge, of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, refused to answer any questions regarding the "Journal Entry" designation of funds in this case.c) In critical court actions the Register of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, concealed the names of the judges involved, in one case listing only "Retired Judge", and in another listing only "Muni Judge".d) I received a declaration under penally of perjury from Defendant Barbara Darwish, stating the the "Muni Judge" in this case was indeed Municipal Court Judge John Segal - in a civil unlimited real property case of the Superior Court of California. In May 2002 Ms Darwish appeared for trial at the California Superior Court, but was instructed to proceed to the Municipal Court, where John Segal purported to conduct a "bench trial" to take her 6-unit Santa Monica rental property.e) John A Clarke, Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court denied requests to certify the case caption, the judgments, or the judges in this case as due case captions, judgments, or judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.e) The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District took three (3) appeals in this case, from two (2) purported Judgments. [2] The first two appeals were denied, and the third was voluntarily dismissed. The first appeal in this case resulted in a published opinion.

In discussing the matter with your Chief Deputy, Danny Potter, today by phone, his only explanation was that the California Court of Appeals liberally construed the law. I would therefore be grateful if you could look into the matter and provide a reasonable explanation for the conduct of the Clerk of the California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, in this case.

* California Court of Appeals, 2nd District online listed the date as : 09/05/2002, in fact it was 05/09/2002 -- both inexplicable relative to time frames for appeals, if construed as date of entry of judgment.

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/