Monday, April 25, 2016

Since
I first went public as a CIA whistleblower in 1995 and put my first
website online in 2000, I have not published a detailed curriculum
vitae on the Internet.

Over
the years, I have made references to some of the training, education,
issues and circumstances listed here, usually because they were
relevant to the subject matter covered in my reports.

Although
this C.V. is limited in scope, it does provide information which may
be of interest to my regular readers regarding my background and
range of interests, and which may help them to interpret my reports
with a greater depth of understanding.

Another
issue of great concern to me is that for over two decades I have been
the Target of a counterintelligence campaign by the U.S. Government
to neutralize me, to discredit my work, everything I stand for, and
ultimately, to silence me.

A
large part of this neutralization campaign involves defamation,
character assassination, disinformation and black propaganda. Most of
the 'information' found on the Internet in connection with the name
of Barbara Hartwell is blatantly false. The obvious exception is my
own website, Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA.

My
name has also been grossly exploited and misrepresented by those
media whores and opportunists employing sensationalism for
self-serving ends. They have pilfered, poached and scavenged from the
information I have exposed, twisted it beyond recognition, engaged in
identity theft, forgery and plagiarism. It has been a nightmare.

There
is no way to stop these morally bankrupt vultures, I can only expose
them by name and refute their lies. The truth for the record is
important to me, and that is the main purpose of this website, to
create and preserve an integral archive of my work in one online
collection.

From
my observations and experience, as both a journalist and as the
subject of the 'journalism' (some professional, some not) of others,
for well over three decades, there is little difference between the
so-called “mainstream” media and what is now known as the
“alternative” media. They are both polluted by the government's
agenda of controlling the flow of information, disseminating
propaganda, and their containment operations. They also run
protection rackets (as criminal enterprises always do), so that
anyone who refuses to be subsumed into the government-sponsored
controlled opposition will be ostracized and blacklisted.

So,
although the perps of this campaign have not succeeded in silencing
me (not yet, anyway), they have certainly managed, using a number of
carefully crafted lies (and many variations thereof), to plant the
seeds of suspicion and to cast a pall of extreme negativity by
promoting outrageous falsehoods in connection with my name.

By
far the most prevalent falsehood is that I am a “CIA Disinfo
Agent”, a lie concocted long ago by the late FBI Chief/COINTELPRO
Kingpin Ted Gunderson, a former professional colleague and friend
turned adversary, who implemented the largest, most organized
campaign to discredit Barbara Hartwell. This, from a very real
“disinfo agent”, J. Edgar Hoover's protege' and right-hand man.

(See
reports on this site in which the legion of liars, shills and
government minions are exposed and their falsehoods refuted.)

Then,
there is the issue of privacy. Many people seem to falsely believe
that just because I (or any other individuals) have a public website,
because I have gone public by exposing information about my
professional background and my dealings with government entities,
that necessarily means every area of my life is an open book, for all
and sundry to peruse. Dead wrong. Anyone who invades my privacy will
find the consequences to be unpleasant, to say the least.

Again,
we come back to the agenda of the government. They are running
massive public indoctrination campaigns designed to inculcate the
populace into accepting a total lack of privacy. 'See Something, Say
Something' (Janet Napolitano). 'Total Information Awareness' (John
Poindexter)....and on and on it goes...

Witness
especially social media, where it seems everyone puts every last
minute detail of their personal business in the street. Surveillance
cameras everywhere; you can't even walk into a supermarket anymore
without your presence being recorded. The government wants you to
believe this is for your “security” or to ensure your “safety”.
No, no, make no mistake: the government is hell bent on snooping into
everyone's business, and any information they collect can be used
against you, or to control you, one way or another.

The
Internet itself is a hot bed of snoops and busybodies, all intent on
sticking their noses into everyone's business, with no respect
whatsoever for the privacy and personal boundaries of the individual.
A free-for-all, no holds barred, nothing is sacred. They not only
accept the lack of privacy, they embrace it! A culture comprised of
snoops, snitches and busybodies. And that's just the way the
government likes it.

People
were shocked by revelations of NSA domestic spying? And that really
comes as a surprise? Some of us have been reporting on unlawful
domestic surveillance programs for decades, protesting the
government's overreach and abuses of power. But lacking the large
audience of mainstream media, we were hard-pressed to get this
information out, we were dismissed as cranks, or “conspiracy
theorists”. But the truth is, we don't need “theories” when
dealing with conspiracy realities.

But
just because these appalling invasions of privacy have become
commonplace, even institutionalized, does this mean we must just sit
back and accept them? Hell, no!

Privacy
is a God-given unalienable right, and is also under constitutional
protection. I am a fierce defender of the right to privacy. I am not
running for public office (never have, never will); I am not employed
by any person or entity, such that the general public would have the
need to know, much less the right to know, information about my
private business.

What
I have chosen to divulge, or not to divulge, is strictly my own
business, and for my own reasons.

I
also must consider the privacy and personal boundaries of others,
especially my relatives, in-laws, friends, colleagues. I won't ever
use their names without their permission, nor compromise their
security, nor endanger their safety. Far too much damage has already
been done to some of these persons, only because of their association
and/or relation to me.

Here
is the amplified C.V. For the public record. Readers, as always, may
make of it what they will.

CIA
OPERATIONS

Now,
regarding CIA. There are many misunderstandings among the general
public regarding CIA operations. Much of what I have written, or
spoken about in my reports and broadcasts may not be common
knowledge, or may stretch credibility. People do not want to believe
that the government would be involved in such unconscionable
activities.

But
anyone who looks at more than two decades of my public reports may
see that the information is consistent. My documentation is based on
direct personal and professional experience.

I
was recruited into CIA Black Operations through a family bloodline,
going back to OSS. I am a third generation intelligence professional.

As
a child, I was brought into CIA MK Ultra program without my knowledge
or consent. I was trained and groomed in intelligence work, to be
officially utilized beginning at the age of eighteen (18). But my
training began in the home at the age of three (3). It was by “proxy
consent” until I reached adulthood. In those days (I was born in
1951), the “legal” age was 18, not 21.

The
training continued, some of which was through formal education, and
some through internal CIA programs. Many people believe that CIA
operations, and the ways agents are utilized are cut-and-dried and
always follow the same patterns and protocols. Nothing could be
further from the truth, especially where black ops are concerned.

MK
Ultra, in particular, has been the subject of tremendous
disinformation and misdirection, in attempts to obscure the true
nature of the operations. The “exposure” of MK Ultra by most of
those claiming to be “victims”, “survivors”, or “experts”,
is rife with sensationalism and lurid tales of satanism and sex
slaves.

In
truth, the original intent of MK Ultra was to “create the perfect
spy” during the Cold War era. Nazi war criminals from an operation
code named Paperclip, were instrumental in the design and
implementation of the operations. The CIA-Nazi collaborations began with OSS, the precursor to CIA.

There
were roughly 165 sub-projects of MK Ultra. One major sideshow being
promoted by government operatives/shills (as well as ignorant people
parroting the shills) is “Monarch”. Monarch was never a
sub-project of MK Ultra, never a CIA operation. And yet, try conducting a search for
information on MK Ultra. What you are likely to find is “Monarch”,
dominating and overshadowing everything else.

It
has never been my purpose in my work as a whistleblower to focus on
MK Ultra, in my reports or broadcasts. The CIA operations in which I
was involved throughout most of my adult life (18-43) were mostly in
the category of Psychological Operations. That is a very broad field,
involving many disciplines. People hear the phrase, “Psy Ops”,
and immediately think the meaning is limited to propaganda campaigns
and “false flag” operations. Not so. There are numerous and
divergent facets to Psy Ops in any government/military entity.

MK
Ultra was just one of the government operations of which I was a
victim (and since 1994, a survivor) though doubtless the worst. In my
opinion, stealing the lives of children, exploiting them for the
government's agenda, and engaging in psychiatric abuses and torture
is the ultimate evil.

And
once again, for the public record (how tiresome it gets...), at no
time was I involved in satanism, nor was I victim of sex abuse, nor
sex slavery. I am damn sick and tired of having to repeatedly correct
these stupid labels slapped on me by the liars desperate to cover
their crimes, and their minions, stooges and shills. I was trained as
an intelligence agent and utilized as such, under NOC. Case closed.

CIA
is described as “an independent federal agency”, under the
executive branch of government. But in reality, CIA often functions
as a rogue agency with little oversight. Just consider the many
scandalous and unlawful covert actions and operations – and these
are only the ones that come to light, by leaks to the press, by
whistleblowers, or by declassified documents, usually many years
after the fact. Then, they try to minimize the wrongdoing and crimes,
trying to justify them claiming “National Security”. There is NO
JUSTIFICATION, under any legitimate legal or moral standards.

Even
when certain operations are exposed, CIA will not acknowledge the
truth. For example, assassinations. Not only assassinations of
foreign nationals, but of U.S. Citizens. CIA, on their “official”
website states that they do not sanction or perform assassinations.
That is a bald faced lie. Aside from the CIA-sponsored murders which
have been exposed and are common knowledge, I have personal knowledge
of numerous assassinations, some of which have taken the lives of my
friends, family and colleagues. Some are falsely promoted as
“accidents”, death by “natural causes”, or the CIA favorite,
“suicide”.

As
long as they can maintain “plausible deniability”, they can (and
do) get away with most anything they want, including murder. I've yet
to see any real accountability as far as these criminals are
concerned, and don't expect I ever will.

Then,
there is torture. They call it “enhanced interrogation”. They
think they can hide behind their euphemisms. Under moral absolutes,
there is NO EXCUSE.

But,
in all my activism (including as a journalist and whistleblower), my
primary purpose is to defend Liberty and pursue Justice. To expose
criminals and evildoers and put them out of business. To stand up for
the God-given unalienable rights of ALL.

Another
misunderstanding which is prevalent is that because a person (in this
case, me) was involved in CIA operations, that was the end-all and
be-all of their existence.

That
is not true. I've known many people who were employed by CIA (in
various capacities), who were utilized in their operations, who also
worked in professions which did not necessarily involve intelligence
work.

Sometimes
the “outside jobs” were a cover, sometimes they were connected to
the operations, in one way or another. But that does not make these
careers, activities or interests any less 'real' or legitimate.

Here,
I have listed some of my formal education and professional pursuits.
This list is not comprehensive, and for reasons of privacy and
security (mine and/or that of others) I have by necessity omitted
certain information.

It
should also be noted that what is given here relates to the past, not
necessarily the present. I am no longer involved, for the most part,
in these activities, though some are interests and pursuits which have remained
with me.

Some
were related to CIA operations, others not. But for those with eyes
to see, this C.V. might provide insights and enhance understanding of my work, at least that is my hope.

Saturday, April 9, 2016

I
received a handwritten letter, sent by post, certified mail,
signature required, at my PO box, posted on this website.

Since
I do not have a public e-mail address, the only way for readers to
contact me is by postal mail. This has been my policy since 2003, for
a number of reasons, foremost among them protecting my privacy and
stopping the flood of hate mail, threats and harassing e-mail from
cyber-stalkers. Also, because people in general have a tendency to
disregard my clearly stated NOTICES that “this website is "for
information purposes only" and “readers may make of it what they
will.”

I
did not recognize the name of the sender, only that the letter came
from Montana. I accepted it and signed for it.

I
do not know the person who sent the letter, nor do I recognize the
name. I am posting the letter here for the public record. Because the
sender asked that I not use her name, I am honoring her request. The
fact that she took the time and trouble to send it by certified mail
told me it must have been important to her.

The
subject of the letter is one Pamela Schuffert. My detailed response
to the letter follows.

The
handwritten letter has been typed by me, an exact copy. I have not
changed a word, nor any punctuation, nor corrected misspellings. The
only misspelling I have changed is the name: Schuffert. It was
spelled: 'Shuffert'.

X

Montana

March
21, 2016

Legal
Defense & Research Trust

Box
22

Rhinebeck,
NY 12572

Dear
Barbara Hartwell,

I
am writing to you concerning Pam Schuffert and a report that I am
working with Pam Schuffert in her dirty scheme to get me back with
dealings I had with her back a couple of years ago. Hell from Mt. X
[sender's name] from Montana & I am so mad I seen that
smear on your sight. I demand it be taken off, it is a Lie, Lie, Lie.
She is a witch from HELL.

I
first heard your interview with Jeremy Floyd, “The Floyd Report”.

Back
a couple of years when he was in Mt. I knew Jeremy. It was through
BJ's A.M. Radio station. I know who you are, the story. Well, I have
mine also. I'm not a spy, I do not work with her, or have anything to
do with her. God help me!! She got ahold of me through somewhere,
Ghost Troop I think? Which she destroyed. She said she was a
reporter. I believed her of course. She moved her butt in my home.
Stole my contact list -group list- tried to poisen me, destroyed my
home. I had to hire a bodyguard to save me, and have a witness, whom
is a x-cop. She would not leave. Finally, I had to have her removed
by the police. Sorry, I am upset.

Then
yesterday I hear from J. McNeil, The Micro Effect Radio, she got in
there. He don't realize the damage she can do. So I e-mailed him. He
had to kick her out also, because she would not leave. Then as proof
I sent him your site, so he can see first hand what he is facing. So
if he goes to the site, guess what he will find? Me!! It destroys my
name and credibility. I did not know you would print that, why did
you not research it first? I am just a person who is in this fight to
save what is left of our country. A nobody. I only trust you because
Jeremy did?

Pam
is out there doing her thing again, I thought she would have quit by
now. Surprise, surprise!!

I
am asking you to please remove me from the blogspot. I do not deserve
the fanfare. Please. The harm it will do, you can't imagine. Yes you
can. Lies can destroy. You know!!

Sincerely,

X

RESPONSE
TO X FROM BARBARA HARTWELL

First
I should say that I have quite a number of reports on this site
exposing Pamela Schuffert, and her M.O. (See links listed below.)
Nothing stated about Pam Schuffert by the writer of this letter comes
as a surprise, so I tend to believe her statements are truthful.

In
fact, I have received numerous letters about the infamous Pam
Schuffert over a period of years, giving testimony of the same
general nature (some of which I have published), as to Schuffert's
unprincipled character and unscrupulous activities. A grifter, a
liar, a thief, a con artist, a stalker, a meddler, a gossip, etc.
etc. No doubt she has done tremendous harm, from coast to coast in
this country, as she travels from place to place, on her ludicrously
misnamed “Prayer Journey” across America.

Some
of her accomplices are also notorious, including career
criminal/predicate felon, fed snitch Tim White, Ken Adachi (who
publishes her outrageous lies about Barbara Hartwell and others). Pam
Schuffert is a fed snitch, part of the crew of COINTELPRO minions and
government stooges, under the direction of the late FBI Chief, Ted
Gunderson.

Just
the grievous harm Pam Schuffert has done to me and my family could
fill volumes. I call her “The Busybody from Hell”.

Unfortunately,
only one of many such individuals (Busybodies from Hell) who have
contributed to destroying the reputation and livelihood of Barbara
Hartwell. The best I can do is expose their offenses, criminal and
civil, in defense of my good name, and as a warning to others. One
reason I decided to publish this letter. Consider it another warning of the evil of Pam Schuffert.

However,
I do not understand X 's demand that the “smear” be removed from
my website.

“I
am so mad I seen that smear on your sight. I demand it be taken off,
it is a Lie, Lie, Lie. She is a witch from HELL.”

Upon
reading the letter, I conducted a number of searches for the writer's
name, including in conjunction with Pam Schuffert. I found nothing.
Then, I did an internal search of my website, Barbara Hartwell Vs,
CIA, to see what, if anything, came up. Nothing.

For
the internal search of Barbara Hartwell Vs. CIA, I got this:

"No
posts matching the query"

I
then took the time to search through my reports on Pam Schuffert, but
found no such name.

So,
unless/until I am able to locate the “smear” in question
(assuming it exists) I am unable to remove it. Or, if X wants to send
me the precise information as to how I would go about locating this "smear", assuming it is actually on my website, I would be
willing to remove it. As stated, I don't recognize X's name.

“I
first heard your interview with Jeremy Floyd, “The Floyd Report”.

Back
a couple of years when he was in Mt. I knew Jeremy. It was through
BJ's A.M. Radio station. I know who you are, the story.”

I
was at one time a frequent guest on Jeremy Floyd's radio program
(GCN), but that was many years ago (more than a decade). I have
nothing but good things to say about Jeremy, especially that he stood
up for me when Alex Jones tried to censor Jeremy's broadcast, pulled
the plug on the show because I was exposing FBI Chief Ted Gunderson
and his crony, former senator/CIA operative John DeCamp, and Jones
threatened him never to have contact with Barbara Hartwell again!

Jeremy
resigned from the station rather than be censored and bullied by Alex
Jones.

But
I've had no contact with Jeremy Floyd since that time.

As
for “the story” of Barbara Hartwell, I doubt that this reader (or
for that matter, most people) would know the truth or the facts about
that, as evidenced by the massive defamation campaigns, ongoing for
more than two decades, and the many false, fraudulent, libelous,
slanderous “stories” which can be found all over the World Wide
Web.

For
those interested, though, the truthful, factual information may be
found on this website.

“Then
as proof I sent him your site, so he can see first hand what he is
facing. So if he goes to the site, guess what he will find? Me!! It
destroys my name and credibility. I did not know you would print
that, why did you not research it first? I am just a person who is in
this fight to save what is left of our country. A nobody. I only
trust you because Jeremy did?”

First,
I would not consider anything posted on a website (including mine) as
“proof” of anything. Evidence, possibly, depending on the
standards employed by the individual reader and the credibility
attributed to the source (in this case, Barbara Hartwell) by that
reader.

Again,
X fails to name the specific information she claims I have “printed”.
As for the accusation, “why did you not research it first”?, she
has not specified what “it” is. I do not ever knowingly print
false information. I do not even know this person. Again, if she
wants to contact me and provide the specific information which she
claims is posted on my site, I can see if her claim has merit.
Otherwise, there is nothing I can do to assist her.

And
since she does not know me, why would she have reason to trust me?
Just because someone else did? No, by my standards at least, trust
must be earned, not handed out indiscriminately.

For
now, all I can do is state that I will be happy to honor X's request
to remove anything which contains her name, again, assuming it can be
located.

As
for Pam Schuffert, maybe X could consider writing her own testimony
(aside from what is given here), using her actual name as a witness.
By my standards, any information coming from “anonymous” sources
has ZERO credibility.

So,
though I don't expect anyone reading this report to give credibility
to the source (being anonymous by her own request), I can state that
in my considered professional opinion, she is most likely providing
truthful information regarding Pam Schuffert, given that her testimony
is consistent with that of many other Targets/Victims of Pam
Schuffert.

As
always, the readers may make of it what they will.

I
do welcome the testimony of witnesses regarding Pam Schuffert, or
other offenders of her ilk, exposed on this website, which I will
publish at my discretion if I believe the information has merit.