I know you didn't like the "soap-opera" of Qblog..you mention that in the interview...but you did praise his rankings as a way for your message not to be lost...and your message at THIS blog is now on the front page of a search engine with just the "Quixtar Blog" keywords. Just like the corporate blogs.

Sure, it's an accomplishment. But in the context of corporate blogs and being directly involved with the Czech Communications event and other discussions, it isn't nearly as significant as it would be in the absence of these other factors.

All of my posts are worthy of their own thread. Yes, I'm that good (that was for pcj).

My understanding is we will have a small roundtable discussion of bloggers, with the A/Q Communications and other folks as the audience, regarding our blogging experiences, why blogging is important, etc.

I've offered to discuss the conference with Dave on a conference call, and this is still an open invitation. I wouldn't mind others calling in to discuss various issues, either. Just give me a couple of days/times (with your time zone), and I'll give you the number to call. It's a "free" (no conference call charges, just whatever your long distance rates are) and anonymous call.

The "red flag" turned out to be a big nothing. Eric couldn't even give me a reason, he finally admitted he had no idea why he "banned" me (as if it had any real impact, there were plenty of other places to blog, especially with the new corporate blogs). I think this came up during the second call, he finally admitted one of his moderators said they were "uncomfortable" or something to that effect, so he turned around and "banned" me.

Just as good as you are in Amway. ---- Thanks, the plan is proceeding quite well, thank you very much.

Seeing as you wouldn't answer a simple question (common theme), they had no way of knowing. ---- The "simple question" was none of his business. Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer. He's a "Get Smart" type of detective.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site. The nature of the internet is you cannot be banned, only "banned", as I just popped up somewhere else. Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time. Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen. That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

Then you were banned again because you broke the rules. Just like Orrin! You're Amway training has served you well. ---- I got tired of the soap opera and intentionally pushed the envelope to get "banned" again, just like I do on all the other inferior sites. I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one. Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban". Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam, but lying cowardly "kingpin" training does attempt to hide the tool scam.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever. ---- He didn't have the authority to be told the personal information he asked for.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites. ---- It's a soap opera now, and I haven't been posting for months.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex. ---- It's not an insult, just a statement of fact.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy. ---- This "no one" is being paid to take his "idiocy" to an international conference, so when hell freezes over, you will become qualified to judge me in any capacity, and I might consider that an insult.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie. ---- Go ahead, ask him. There were conversations from others on his site and I believe qblog to that effect. Currently, my comments are "approved" by jc on his new site.

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose? ---- I've got plenty of money to lose, just like millions of other IBO's have lost and are still losing plenty of money to the tool scam.

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint! ---- That may be your vote, but it's a lonely and incorrect vote.

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more. ---- Wow, a company demonstrating product quality so they can produce more volume. You better jump on that little scam, pcj.

EXCELLENT!!!! And what kind of training was on those 10,000 tapes you bought for $2,000, to add to your existing collection of hundreds (at a much steeper price)? ---- With the knowledge of the tool scam, very good training.

Kingpin training. Tool scam training. Not Amway or 'business' training at all. ---- There's plenty of Amway and business training on the tapes/CD's.

I've been waiting for you to finally slip and admit that for months. ---- Sorry to ruin your day....not really.

Now tex is a liar. The first time, you were banned for being a pompous ass. The second time, tex was banned for breaking forum rules. He was allowed reinstatement from the first ban after participating in a podcast but broke forum rules and then got banned for a second time.

Now tex is a liar. The first time, you were banned for being a pompous ass. ---- I guess I didn't catch the "pompous ass" rule. Can you find it for me? If true, there should be several others who should be "banned" from qblog.

The second time, tex was banned for breaking forum rules. He was allowed reinstatement from the first ban after participating in a podcast but broke forum rules and then got banned for a second time. ---- Again, which rules did I break? The only one I got close to was using more than a single ID, but since my first one was banned from the site, I wasn't technically using two when I started using the other one. Besides, I didn't care if I was breaking rules at this point, so it didn't even matter to me.

Bottom line, I don't even CARE that I was "banned", that site is a soap opera. In fact, it was a good thing, it kept me from spending time responding to idiots like YOU, jc.

jc, you're the one who lied about not being the same jc on the wsg site, until it was proven you are the same person. LIAR.

Here's the part where tex is a pompous ass, not to mention threatening Qblog:

QBlog,

Nice catch, but not before several people saw the note. This is as easy as it is going to get for you. Better come clean and explain why you banned me, or be prepared to keep a VERY close eye on your site 24/7. There will be more and more folks wondering about how you can promote the first amendment and then trample all over it. For example, here's a note I sent to willy, my response is in italics:

Here's the part where tex is a pompous ass, not to mention threatening Qblog:

QBlog,

Nice catch, but not before several people saw the note. This is as easy as it is going to get for you. Better come clean and explain why you banned me, or be prepared to keep a VERY close eye on your site 24/7. There will be more and more folks wondering about how you can promote the first amendment and then trample all over it. For example, here's a note I sent to willy, my response is in italics:

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

You were actually banned, not "banned." ---- I was banned from his site.

Oh, I was right again.

Although I later found out he just wanted to see if I would say the correct answer.

We all found out. It's just you can't seem to say the correct answer, ever.

Plus, the issue was I couldn't speak the truth on his site, as it was being reduced to a soap opera and a waste of time.

Soap opera waste of time is your common effect on sites.

Just like you living is a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

When you become qualified to judge me in any capacity, I might consider that an insult. Until then, I'll just chalk it up to ineffective and immature defensive posturing by Tex.

That's why it's silly to "ban" someone.

You're not someone. You're no one. Banning you seems to be good practice and avoids clogging up threads with your idiocy.

I drove jc so crazy he had to shut down his previous site and go to a new one, because he didn't have the ability to "ban" me from the first one.

Delusions of grandeur. Let's ask JC if that's correct...seeing as he initially didn't ban you from the new site to start out with. If what you said was true, you'd have already been banned. You still get to post there. So, that's a lie.

Orrin lost a lot more money with his ban than I did with my "ban".

You don't have any money to lose, so what's your point? You're more effective at getting banned because you're a no one with nothing to lose?

Tex: voted most likely to be a no one with nothing to lose. He didn't disappoint!

Amway training doesn't teach you to submit to a tool scam,

There was no such thing as 'Amway training' other than product demonstrations so you'd buy more.

Um - no, that's what I said. Now you're just lying again. JC didn't ban you, and he didn't change sites because he couldn't ban you. He now only moderates you - which is what you require to be allowed to be posted anywhere.