One can look at Breyer's statements several ways. I happen to agree with Mr. Silveria's assessment much or most of what Breyer said was the product of negligible research and an indifferent education on the historical antecedents of our constitution by one or more clerks.

Justice Breyer is ultimately at fault for not catching the circular reasoning of his statement, and, more importantly, not being au courant with all aspects of our constitution which is the basis for determining all cases coming before him. >MW

One can look at Breyer's statements several ways. I happen to agree with Mr. Silveria's assessment much or most of what Breyer said was the product of negligible research and an indifferent education on the historical antecedents of our constitution by one or more clerks.

Justice Breyer is ultimately at fault for not catching the circular reasoning of his statement, and, more importantly, not being au courant with all aspects of our constitution which is the basis for determining all cases coming before him. >MW

Click to expand...

Yeah, a judge who can tell you what the Constitution 'really' means, yet
maybe has never read it. Who appointed him? That speaks volumes.

Like Us On Facebook!

The Firearms Forum is on online community for all gun enthusiasts. Join us to discuss firearms of all kinds, gun accessories, legal issues and more. Membership is free and we welcome all types of shooters, whether you're a novice or a pro. Come for the info, stay and make some friends.