BankThink
More on the Chase overdraft fee story

Matthew Miller, the man who lost more than $1,400 to Chase in a puzzling series of overdraft fees last month has written to BankThink with an update, which we wanted to share with our readers:

"When I went to my branch two days ago, nearly everyone in line was having a similar problem, but of much lesser magnitude," he wrote in an email. "Two people closed their accounts on the spot.

"The switch from WaMu to Chase was made to appear to be simply a name-change, and the actual services we enjoyed with WaMu would not be altered. Sadly, that is not the case, and I am $1,400+ poorer for my assumption the bank was being forthright in their claims.

"I am going to try one last time today to see if I can get any of the fees reversed, but I am so beat-down by this I may just give up."

The increasing adoption of virtual card payments by accounts payable departments has created an unex­pected complication for suppliers: more friction in the processing, posting and reconciliation of payments and receivables. The root of the problem is that most suppliers rely on a manual approach to processing e-mailed virtual card payments. Suppliers are forced to balance their organization’s need for operational efficiency and control with rising customer demand to pay with a virtual card. But a new breed of tech­nology enables suppliers to process virtual card payments straight-through, addressing the needs of buyers and suppliers. This paper details the growth of electronic business-to-business (B2B) payments, shows how manual approaches to processing virtual card payments cause friction in accounts receivables, describes a way to process virtual card payments straight-through, and highlights the benefits of friction­less payments.