The team just wasn't flowing today. Looked like no one was on the same wavelength when attacking, which meant every decision and pass was too slow and we arrived in their final third with too much to do. And when they did try and quicken things up on the odd occasion it broke down almost immediately. So frustrating to watch and you could feel that nothing was really gonna change. Lucky to get a goal, really.

I'm not quite sure what it is but having been on this sub for 2 game cycles now it's pretty obvious to see that the general feeling around the sub tends to be more negative when things are quiet. Maybe people that enjoy the games move on which just leaves the disgruntled ones here looking to air their views.

I started the campaign again recently having got an X and I forgot just how good the game feels to play. The movement and gunplay feel really good, with interesting environments and levels that gave you a little more choice on how you tackle them. Unfortunately for me the whole thing was let down by the narrative running through it.

If they can fix that issue then I think Halo 6 campaign could be a banger.

And there's me thinking we were having a discussion. You're in a public forum after all. If you express your opinion on something here don't be surprised if people express the difference in their's to you, particularly if your opinion seems unjustified to those people.

That said I appreciate people often take it past a discussion, which is typically around the time insults get thrown.

Bending the truth a little there me ol' mate. He jokingly answered a statement posed to him...

When he was told he is the only one happy with the GP17's turning, Miller jokingly said: "Maybe some of them need to go and ride other bikes."

Anyway we could go round and round in circles. Personally I don't think your view of Marc is justified compared to whats actually going on, but there we are. If we were all the same things would be pretty boring, as they say.

I don't disagree with any of that for the most part, and I didn't actually say anything to you to the contrary.

In any case my question still remains on how Rossi and Miller are controversial and therefore not boring. Miller gets closer to controversial on the very odd occasion, but Rossi? I really don't see much difference in how they behave.

You're right, I'm sure the public would love to see girls groped on the podium, or marshals being punched in the face (a la Hunt) today. Come on, man.

I agree with you that people who show their personality quirks are more desirable, mainly because we all have them and it makes them seem more human, but personally I think your argument against Marquez specifically is flimsy at best. If you'd said Dani I'd understand, but what are the likes of Miller or Rossi doing different? Aside from calling someone a wanker, or saying 'faak' every now and again. What's controversial and therefore not boring from them?

Your opinion is your opinion, keep it, but it's my opinion that there's a healthy dose of confirmation bias and assumption about the man's character going on from your end because it fits your narrative.