Introverts and the ‘new groupthink’

Disclosure: I am a raging introvert. I’m here, I’m not particularly loud, get used to it. I can come off as aloof, uncaring and anti-social. Whenever I run or work out, I like to do so alone. It gives me time to think and clear my head after days that are all too often full of meetings, interactions and interruptions. I like to think about stuff. Sometimes I like to think about stuff more than I actually like doing stuff. Which drives my wife crazy on weekends, especially when I’m blogging instead of being, you know, productive.

I also digress.

Anyway. I tell you all of that so you will know why I come off as such a fanboy of this article, The Rise of the New Groupthink, which was published in this weekend’s New York Times Sunday Review. I can’t convey with enough enthusiasm my praise for this article. (Of course I can’t. I’m a pensive, analytical introvert. But if you would, please imagine this animated little guy inside my brain doing handsprings and screaming Squee! about this essay. Are you with me?)

(I have a feeling that most extroverts have checked out by now. Here goes Andy, all up inside his head again, with ideas and stuff, so no thank you. Next? So this may be preaching to the choir. But those extroverts in charge of things will need to know this stuff, too. So I hope you’ll pass these ideas along to them. You can bet that I will, in the same way that, back in 2003, I passed along photocopies of Jonathan Rauch’s great essay Caring for Your Introvert to every co-worker and supervisor who would receive it.)

The author of this article is Susan Cain, who is also the author of a forthcoming book Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking. She too is an introvert and proud of it, perhaps even over-zealously so. (She advocates a “quiet revolution,” which comes complete with manifesto. To arms, comrades! In the solitude of your studies, that is.) Her essay resonates with my introverted self in many ways. But there are so many good ideas presented in that piece that anyone, introvert or extrovert, in higher ed culture — where meetings and face-to-face time can suck the energy from even the hardiest of marketing and PR minds — ought to heed.

What Cain calls the “new groupthink” is this idea, so prevalent in higher ed, as well as in many other types of organizations, that “creativity and achievement come from an oddly gregarious place.”

“Most of us,” she writes, “now work in teams, in offices without walls, for managers who prize people skills above all. … The New Groupthink has overtaken our workplaces, our schools and our religious institutions.”

Here are some ideas and takeaways from this piece that piqued my interest:

Privacy can aid creativity. In our higher ed marketing culture, where brainstorming sessions have become routine, we might think the opposite is true. But as Cain writes, “Research strongly suggests that people are more creative when they enjoy privacy and freedom from interruption. And the most spectacularly creative people in many fields are often introverted. … They’re extroverted enough to exchange and advance ideas, but see themselves as independent and individualistic. They’re not joiners by nature.”

Cain points to the success of Apple, and the quieter half of the fabled pioneering partnership, Steve Wozniak. Woz “who toiled alone on a beloved invention, the personal computer,” long before Steve Jobs entered the picture. True, Jobs deserves much credit for Apple’s success. But if not for the work of the lone engineer Wozniak, who knows what might have happened?

Takeaway: Don’t assume the most gregarious “team players” in your group are the most creative. Give people time to work in solitude.

Solitude can aid productivity. It isn’t just the creative types — designers, writers, etc. — who benefit from privacy, according to Cain. She cites one study of programmers at top-performing companies which revealed that the best weren’t necessarily the most experience or highest-paid. Instead, what distinguished the best from the rest “was how much privacy, personal workspace and freedom from interruption they enjoyed.”

In our workspace, the “front office” staff have little opportunity for solitude, and they probably suffer more than any of us from interruptions, office chit-chat, etc. Even though they aren’t designing websites or writing for the alumni magazine, they are engaged in projects and work — accounting, scheduling, organizing — that could benefit from some peace and quiet every once in a while.

Takeaway: Give all members of your team a chance for some solitude.

Solitude helps you learn. Often, “the best way to master a field is to work on the task that’s most demanding for you personally. And often the best way to do this is alone.” On the other hand, “brainstorming sessions are one of the worst possible ways to stimulate creativity.”

Takeaway: Brainstorming is great for generating ideas, but don’t expect the “great” ideas to come from those activities. And don’t rely on brainstorming as your only way to get new ideas or solve problems.

Not all group activity is bad. “Some teamwork is fine and offers a fun, stimulating, useful way to exchange ideas, manage information and build trust,” Cain writes. “But it’s one thing to associate with a group in which each member works autonomously on his piece of the puzzle; it’s another to be corralled into endless meetings or conference calls conducted in offices that afford no respite from the noise and gaze of co-workers.”

Takeaway: Don’t abandon team-building activities, but realize that sometimes we all need some time to ourselves.

In conclusion: We all should heed the immortal words of Billy Idol and, at the end of a long day, “sink another drink, ‘cuz it’ll give me time to think.”

I have pre-ordered Quiet, which releases Jan. 24, and plan to devour it as soon as I get a moment’s peace. Maybe I can even talk Susan Cain into share some insight in a Friday Five interview.

Thanks for this summary. Great takeaways, and I can relate to this very much indeed. This is also timely for me, as I’m preparing two talks on the general topic of “creativity and leadership.” There was a missing component in my approach, but I couldn’t quite figure out what it was. Now I know: Intro- versus extroversion and its relevance.

Your post also popped up as I was reading the following article and related site, which people interested in your topic may find relevant:

Andy S. – Thanks for sharing those links! I’ll definitely check on them. The other article I referenced above (“Caring for Your Introvert,” by Jonathan Rauch) was published in The Atlantic way back in 2003. I have the original paper version filed away and was happy to find it online.

Just want to say, as a fellow introvert, I salute you. Personally, I’m a big fan of organizations that mix group time with solo time. It has a kind of elasticity to it that allows me time to focus and generate so that I can bring something back to the group.

Great post. I am blessed to have a balanced distribution of introverts verse extroverts in my office. As educational leaders we should make it a priority to understand those working in our departments to better utilize their specific learning and instructional styles. We find that our productivity levels increase as well as our employee morale.

Great post! Thank you! I haven’t gotten to the Review yet, but I’ll read it as soon as I get home.

As a raging introvert myself, I am aware of how many good ideas I’ve had in the shower or after runs. In other words, times when I am totally quiet and able to let my mind wander.

OTOH, being an introvert and a leader is sometimes very difficult. I experience this personally, and I saw it firsthand with several university presidents I knew. They’d shine in intimate dinners and small groups, but alumni complained about their presence in those big public ceremonial gatherings. The presidents learned how to deal with those events — and alumni got over themselves — but it was painful to watch and listen for a while.

Tara – Thanks for chiming in. I too am blessed to have a relatively balanced distribution, although in recent months the balance has shifted more toward the introverts, which is making things even more interesting. Having a mix of writers, designers, videographers, photos , administrative staff and managers (who also write, design, etc.), it’s important to achieve balance.

Michael – Great point about the challenges introverts face in leadership positions. In our culture, leaders must be visible and often gregarious. Some introverts are great at this, but it does drain them of energy, and they need some quiet time to recharge. (Contrast that approach with the extroverts, who draw their energy from being with people.)

Great post! I am lucky enough, by virtue of being a one-woman-army in my department, to be afforded a lot of solitude. But I think some people assume that a career in marketing/PR requires an extroverted personality. It can be easy to forget that introverts have unique strengths too, and by nature of our personalities, we don’t typically prioritize touting those strengths publicly!

[…] very frequent basis. The view is set to "news". Try clicking on "video" and "2" for more articles. Suppes said h…ttery.jpg/300px-Photo-CarBattery.jpg" alt="Old: Banks of conventional lead-acid car batte…" […]