I have had discussions with quite some people who also listened to the Proper Gander podcast series, both the 220 “sane” ones and the about 15 “insane” ones at the end. From that, and AAMorris’s own words, I basically see three options:1 – a mental breakdown2 – a professional shill3 – a piece of performance art

Those of you who are familiar with the web persona known as ‘Miles Mathis’ are probably aware of my Open Letter to Miles Mathis from a while back, which outs ‘him’ as a committee of spooks, likely out of the Tavistock Institute in Britain. Well, old ‘Miles’ has mentioned me (and not too kindly) a couple times in past essays on his milesmathis.com… site, but I hadn’t realized the impact I’ve had on the psy op until a few days ago when one of you alerted me to a MM post that demonstrates how upset they are about my exposés.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/06/17/an-assault-by-miles-mathis-allan-c-weisbecker/feed/14854489Fake crowds are cheaper than you thinkhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/24/fake-crowds-are-cheaper-than-you-think/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/24/fake-crowds-are-cheaper-than-you-think/#respondThu, 24 May 2018 22:38:52 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/24/fake-crowds-are-cheaper-than-you-think/

The power of the fake person, multiplied! Curator Karen Patterson puts a fake outsider artist in the museum and artist David Levine puts on a museum show about the fake crowd. We hear from a 1937 radio play that featured both Orson Welles and the first fake crowd ever broadcast on the radio. And backstage on our Radiotopia live tour, your host turns to fellow ‘topes Roman Mars and Helen Zaltzman for help deciphering an unexpected laugh. PLUS!!!! The long awaited return of ToE’s original extra

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/24/fake-crowds-are-cheaper-than-you-think/feed/0854275Neil deGrasse Tyson – a 9/11 shillhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/11/22/neil-degrasse-tyson-a-9-11-shill/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/11/22/neil-degrasse-tyson-a-9-11-shill/#commentsThu, 23 Nov 2017 01:52:44 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=851296More proof that NGT is nothing more than a lie-n-tist who’s put before us to promote psYops and hoaxes.

Last year, on the tenth anniversary of the events of 9/11, StarTalk Radio produced a special episode about that fateful day. Here’s how Neil deGrasse Tyson starts the episode: “…I lived three and a half blocks from what would later be known as Ground Zero. I was home that morning, and the entire series of… View Article

Anyone ever notice that anyone, especially media types, that lived in NYC around 9/11, is a firsthand eyewitness or has a story about 9/11? This is similar to anyone who’s lived anywhere near Germany around WW2 is a holocaust survivor. No matter how tenuous a link, the media can find and magnify victimhood.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/04/25/easy-conspiracies-used-for-gatekeeping/feed/0849084Allan on Miles Mathis, Simon and Hoihttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/04/10/allan-on-miles-mathis-simon-and-hoi/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/04/10/allan-on-miles-mathis-simon-and-hoi/#commentsMon, 10 Apr 2017 16:12:56 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/04/10/allan-on-miles-mathis-simon-and-hoi/Allan takes shots at all of them in this piece.

I’m not exactly sure what Allan’s stance is on 9/11 and JFK, but I don’t think it aligns with mine.

Hi folks (plus ‘Miles,’ whoever ya’ll are),

Sorry for the delay. It took longer than I thought to put together the supporting imagery. Keep in mind that this is a continuation of Part One!

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/07/25/disillusioned-by-the-captain/feed/0757726Chemtrails are airborne waste dumpshttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2015/06/03/chemtrails-are-airborne-waste-dumps/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2015/06/03/chemtrails-are-airborne-waste-dumps/#commentsThu, 04 Jun 2015 03:15:15 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=286051I get poked about chemtrails many times, but I really am not avoiding the topic for any particular reason other than I don’t see them as anything other than contrails. Iff I had to pick a reason behind them iff they are not contrails, then I think the KISS principle applies to Miles’ explanation here.

Other tidbits include good jabs at Fetzer, Goldbug and other confusion and disinformation.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2015/06/03/chemtrails-are-airborne-waste-dumps/feed/15286051I work there therefore they’re realhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2015/05/22/i-work-there-therefore-theyre-real/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2015/05/22/i-work-there-therefore-theyre-real/#commentsFri, 22 May 2015 12:52:20 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=272394Chris Hadfield works for NASA – that doesn’t make the ISS real.

Here’s a recent feedback marked “praise”.

Name: Jared
Email: xxx
Comment: Ab, I thought I’d drop you a line regarding satellites, here’s a news flash THEY EXIST.. and I will tell you why. I’m an engineer for a major consumer drone manufacturer. We wouldn’t have multi-million dollar investors if we had no GPS technology and every drone we made just flew away if radio contact was lost. Get your head out of your ass you moron! You have some good shows, but this bullshit along with the nuke crap completely destroys what little credibility you have.

I will bet as much money as you want that satellites exist.. you name the wager and I will take it, I will even fly you out to Los Angeles and prove it to you.. just make sure to bring cash to cover your bet.

I’m ready to prove you wrong, will you admit it? Probably not, just stick to your bullshit that you and your 15 listeners can all keep talking about.
Type of feedback: Praise
Pathway to fakeologist.com……: audio broadcast
Ok to publish (user)name (if not an introduction?): Yes

What could he show me in Los Angeles to prove that satellites are real? A movie? Jared, read through the cluesforum thread on satellites and start refuting their points.

Many speculated that Betsy was just a voice and icon, and soon after we get video of her mocking this claim.

Is this latest video enough to convince you that she’s a real person, and not a 2015 simulation of one? I’m not sure how much farther software has to progress before we can never tell, but the only aspect I wanted to concentrate on in this shilly video was her.

The obvious focus is her mouth. Does it move in sync with her audio? Not precisely. What about the constant clipping and fast edits? There are no extended clips before we see an edit jump. Let’s look at her strategically placed glasses. Are they obscuring her eyes? Are her eyes opened or closed? Are they blinking enough? What about the reflections of the monitor in her glasses? Her eyebrows appear jumpy even without edits.

There is no doubt that there are no magical directed energy weapons that can dustify and disassociate steel and concrete. It’s a fantasy only for film. There is no doubt her videos are Hollywool quality, complete with mood altering background music.

The only question is: does the simulation extend to herself? If so, we’re going to be seeing a lot more of her kind as the psyops continue.