On paper we are the most complete team in the NFL. That's is what the Seahawks are after presumably signing Antoine Winfield. And it will most likely be the word of the year for your 2013 Seahawks.

Complete each workout. Complete each day. Complete each week. Complete each play. Complete each game. Complete each win. Complete each goal. Complete the season. Complete the post-season. Complete a Super-Bowl win.

All or Nothing. Every player, every coach, every front office personnel the Seahawks have in employment know that its... All or Nothing. That time is now, the time of greatness for every 12 who has held on that fleeting hope for a championship is now. For us, every Seahawk fan in existence, its all or nothing... we have to rise and roar for every small moment to every great occasion. We have to set the premise for the years to come. In 5 years, we can look back on this time and we can all say...

We do need a kicker, and if we're completely honest, we need another starting-caliber linebacker. Malcolm Smith is OK, but I would really like to see another name battling in training camp for that spot. I know it will be addressed during the draft, but I am just saying if they want to go into the draft will all the holes filled, I would point to that one.

I'll be surprised if even 5 of these draft picks and UDFA's make this roster. The level of competition for spots is going to be amazing.

Also, to the OP, we haven't completed jack. You don't worry about the "dynasty" label until you win multiple Super Bowls. We still have to fight our way out of the toughest division in football and getting HFA is imperative. The 49ers are excellent, and the Rams are going to be tough.

As the Deadskins (and others like the Eagles) have learned, you don't win anything in the off-season or pre-season. The difference with the Seahawks is we already had arguably the most talented roster in the league before this free agent windfall and we all know that our front office is one of best at the draft.

FlyingGreg wrote:I'll be surprised if even 5 of these draft picks and UDFA's make this roster. The level of competition for spots is going to be amazing.

Also, to the OP, we haven't completed jack. You don't worry about the "dynasty" label until you win multiple Super Bowls. We still have to fight our way out of the toughest division in football and getting HFA is imperative. The 49ers are excellent, and the Rams are going to be tough.

As the Deadskins (and others like the Eagles) have learned, you don't win anything in the off-season or pre-season. The difference with the Seahawks is we already had arguably the most talented roster in the league before this free agent windfall and we all know that our front office is one of best at the draft.

I think the operable words were "on paper". That pretty much qualifies it and I also think it's understood that the games have to be played.

" Remember the men and women in uniform that have signed that blank check for us."

I would like to Haushka come back... he is reliable.. may not be the greatest from long distance, but he is money inside 50.. would hate to see us go cheap on the kicker and then lose a few close ones because of missed FGs..

FlyingGreg wrote:I'll be surprised if even 5 of these draft picks and UDFA's make this roster. The level of competition for spots is going to be amazing.

Also, to the OP, we haven't completed jack. You don't worry about the "dynasty" label until you win multiple Super Bowls. We still have to fight our way out of the toughest division in football and getting HFA is imperative. The 49ers are excellent, and the Rams are going to be tough.

As the Deadskins (and others like the Eagles) have learned, you don't win anything in the off-season or pre-season. The difference with the Seahawks is we already had arguably the most talented roster in the league before this free agent windfall and we all know that our front office is one of best at the draft.

I think the operable words were "on paper". That pretty much qualifies it and I also think it's understood that the games have to be played.

No. The comment at the end of the OP is "we've completed a Dynasty", which is completely untrue.

Barthawk wrote:I would like to Haushka come back... he is reliable.. may not be the greatest from long distance, but he is money inside 50.. would hate to see us go cheap on the kicker and then lose a few close ones because of missed FGs..

I understand the spirit of the OP, but we aren't quite there yet. Close...oh so close...I can taste it. This is going to be a season to remember if nothing else. The 49ers were great last season. What they are this season remains to be seen, much like what the Hawks are now remains to be seen, but there is a lot to be excited for. I don't think I've seen a roster this juicy going into the draft. It's going to be fun to watch and see what they pull out of it this year. Camp is going to be intense that's for sure.

“There’s no reason, with Mr. Allen and the fan base here and the stadium, that this can’t be a stable, long-term winning organization.” - John Schneider

Pandion Haliaetus wrote:On paper we are the most complete team in the NFL. That's is what the Seahawks are after presumably signing Antoine Winfield. And it will most likely be the word of the year for your 2013 Seahawks.

Complete each workout. Complete each day. Complete each week. Complete each play. Complete each game. Complete each win. Complete each goal. Complete the season. Complete the post-season. Complete a Super-Bowl win.

And it rhymes with compete. Nice.

Pandion Haliaetus wrote:All or Nothing. Every player, every coach, every front office personnel the Seahawks have in employment know that its... All or Nothing. That time is now, the time of greatness for every 12 who has held on that fleeting hope for a championship is now. For us, every Seahawk fan in existence, its all or nothing... we have to rise and roar for every small moment to every great occasion. We have to set the premise for the years to come. In 5 years, we can look back on this time and we can all say...

we've completed a Dynasty.

I drink blue koolaid by the barrel, but I'm gagging on this. PLEASE don't use terms like "All or Nothing" and "Dynasty", especially at this point in the offseason! It's begging for jinx and ridicule and smells like drunk chili farts.

49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.

v1rotv2 wrote:I think the operable words were "on paper". That pretty much qualifies it and I also think it's understood that the games have to be played.

No. The comment at the end of the OP is "we've completed a Dynasty", which is completely untrue.

bellingerga wrote:

Pandion Haliaetus wrote:we've completed a Dynasty.

Getting ahead of yourself big time.

In fairness, he did say that from the perspective of looking back five years from now. He wasn't saying it now.

49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.

The starting spots may all be more or less wrapped up. I do love the "draft for depth" scenario. Will there be a better player at the 2nd line of the depth chart at more positions than we currently have? Can we groom the "next man up" scenario? Can we draft a guy that unseats a starter? Yea! We CAN! Never before have I been more intrigued by our upcoming draft. Those players will be critical for special teams and depth behind crucial positions. We were relatively thin on OL, DL, LB, and WR last year - I'm hoping we can up the caliber of the depth chart as my major need going into the draft.

nsport wrote:The starting spots may all be more or less wrapped up. I do love the "draft for depth" scenario. Will there be a better player at the 2nd line of the depth chart at more positions than we currently have? Can we groom the "next man up" scenario? Can we draft a guy that unseats a starter? Yea! We CAN! Never before have I been more intrigued by our upcoming draft. Those players will be critical for special teams and depth behind crucial positions. We were relatively thin on OL, DL, LB, and WR last year - I'm hoping we can up the caliber of the depth chart as my major need going into the draft.

nsport wrote:The starting spots may all be more or less wrapped up. I do love the "draft for depth" scenario. Will there be a better player at the 2nd line of the depth chart at more positions than we currently have? Can we groom the "next man up" scenario? Can we draft a guy that unseats a starter? Yea! We CAN! Never before have I been more intrigued by our upcoming draft. Those players will be critical for special teams and depth behind crucial positions. We were relatively thin on OL, DL, LB, and WR last year - I'm hoping we can up the caliber of the depth chart as my major need going into the draft.

I guess the key word was "relatively" thin because you're right, our backup players did appear to be bringing a lot more than on other teams. The backups were probably better than most teams' backups. No doubt the draft for depth and maybe pop a starter from the draft would be a great outcome!

We're right there, but SF's coaching staff and FO have proven they can improve their roster pretty well also.

If they're as smart as the media says they are, they know that hoard of draft picks won't make the team. If I were the GM there, I'd packsage picks to move up and take impact players that will play NOW.

SF can be a very scary team if they improve their weapons on the outside. As good as both defenses are, I can see shootouts if they get the right weapons.

I recall the AFC Central when the Steelers, Browns, and Bengals were all good, chess moves and pieces being used to shore up a weakness or exploit one from a division rival. It was pretty brutal in that division with all three of them taking a spot as a winner. No Dynasty since each of the other teams pushed every year and injuries could dictate who came out on top.

Nobody wanted to play those teams, mostly because they would take out any anger and frusteration on you.

Unfortunatly I see our division working in that direction. Taking the rose colored glasses off and setting the Kool Aide aside it will be a competition out of the gate. 49ers we know about, they are the current champions like it or not and are still capable even with the loses they had, they are signing guys they beleive in just as we are and have a bunch of draft choices to barter and trade with. Rams are going to be better, if you think they are going to fade to the back of the bus I think your not looking at what Fisher is doing there. He's getting younger, he's getting more physical, he's getting more aggressive, just like us and S.F. Arizona is a wild card, do I think they can push to the top? No, do I think they can provide some drama and upsets, absolutly. The legitimised the QB position, they lost their DC but still have most the players on defense that make people respect them, the could pull a Pete and go 7 & 9 easlily since nobody knows what they are doing yet.

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. Member of the 38 club.

Pandion Haliaetus wrote:On paper we are the most complete team in the NFL. That's is what the Seahawks are after presumably signing Antoine Winfield. And it will most likely be the word of the year for your 2013 Seahawks.

Complete each workout. Complete each day. Complete each week. Complete each play. Complete each game. Complete each win. Complete each goal. Complete the season. Complete the post-season. Complete a Super-Bowl win.

All or Nothing. Every player, every coach, every front office personnel the Seahawks have in employment know that its... All or Nothing. That time is now, the time of greatness for every 12 who has held on that fleeting hope for a championship is now. For us, every Seahawk fan in existence, its all or nothing... we have to rise and roar for every small moment to every great occasion. We have to set the premise for the years to come. In 5 years, we can look back on this time and we can all say...

we've completed a Dynasty.

You have to win a few superbowls to be considered a dynasty.

Hasselbeck wrote:Matt Flynn should be our starter. Wilson is nothing more than a backup and will never amount to anything in this league.

chris98251 wrote:I disagree, the Vikings and Bills were dynastys that just happened to be one game short 5 times.

The majority would not agree with you.

I see one person, going to the Superbowl 5 times and losing means you suck ass then and are a worthless piece of crap team with no right to be proud of making it one game short, yeah second place sucks, but how pumped would this board be to be there 5 times in like ten years or so.

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. Member of the 38 club.