"Marine Radioactivity 101" -- Fukushima infographic.
http://tinyurl.com/mmebox7
Jaro
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Cary Renquist
Sent: November-04-13 12:35 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: [ RadSafe ] 28 fallacies about the Fukushima nuclear disaster's
effect on the US West Coast | Southern Fried Science
Well done article by a Marine Ecologist debunking doom-n-gloom radioactive
contamination articles...
Since I believe in open, honest discourse, let me begin by pointing out that
I am not a physicist, nor do I have any particular credentials when it comes
to nuclear energy. I am a marine ecologist. You'll find, however, that for
these 28 points, the devil is not in the details. Most are the result of
logical fallacies, rather than technical inaccuracies.
Many are simply articles taken out of context or unbelievably tenuous
observations followed by "couldn't it be Fukushima?" In a follow up, the
author even argues that he's "Just asking questions" a phrase I thought was
long ago relegated to Glenn Beck parodies. A fifth of these points don't
even have to do with the North American West Coast.
28 fallacies about the Fukushima nuclear disaster's effect on the US West
Coast http://j.mp/1dI8guH
--
Cary Renquist
Cary.renquist at ezag.com
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://health.phys.iit.edu/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://health.phys.iit.edu