In the picture at left, NRC staff are leaving the meeting while the plant opponents have taken over the front of the room. There's a short video of this meeting at the post Planned Disruption at NRC Meeting. Full coverage is at the ANS blog.

Local Opinions On the Meeting

I would like to share two local opinions that were published after the meeting.

Newspaper op-ed: The Keene Sentinel wrote: Democracy is More Than Making Noise: "But we don’t share any belief that such protest performances will have constructive material effects, nor do we share the conviction by some participants that the disruptive tactics represent something larger than they are."

"Then about four years ago the NRC was here to tell us how great Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee was doing. I think it may have been another annual assessment meeting, and a dear friend tossed a handful of compost to the NRC delegates here...Swear words and compost are not toxic and they do not cause cancer like radiation can."

Does Intimidation Work?

As we can tell from Sachs letter, nuclear opponents in Vermont embrace the politics of intimidation and feel justified in using them. They have used intimidation for many years.

Disruption and intimidation. It works at some level. Still, I can't imagine an undecided person watching this meeting and thinking:"Wow. these anti-nuclear people are right. They have convinced me. I want to get out there and chant and shout too!"

I would like to see some commentary on public opinion in Vermont. Meredith reported that a recent poll found Vermonters were about evenly split on whether the state should force the closure of VY. How does this compare with earlier polls, and in polls taken in nearby states? Is public opinion perceptibly shifting? I live in a western state with mostly coal and NG generation, with a little bit of hydro. No nukes left, and as far as I know, none planned. The political situation in VT on this issue is really fascinating.