Any one else sad cuz they recently purchased an Alabama, when you could have Massachusetts for 2 dollars more that outperforms it in just about every way? From wows-numbers.com it's averaging 76,202 damage compared to Bamas 55,985. Massachusetts destroyed warships is 1.12 compared to Bamas .79. Massachusetts KDR is 1.98 to Bamas 1.49. Add to that all the testimonials on the forums so far and its pretty damning. The numbers are similar across all servers showing the Massachusetts is a vastly superior ship.
This is a great example of power creep, they didn't just make the sister ship different, they made it much better. I guess that's how you get people to buy it.

How about the BBs that don't even fire up their engines until 18:00 or later, then claim slow login. That would be legit if it wasn't 4 of them doing it at the same time. I think its a compensation for the lack of proper cruiser usage mostly. The proliferation of island hiders and "support cruisers" that hide behind the BBs is epic lately.

Nah but if I wanted to play World of Tanks, I'd play it. Having 6+ enemy ships peek-a-booing every match just ruins the feel of the combat. Just my opinion, I'm sure there's tons of WoT players that love this new style in WoWs.

Its turned the game into World of Tanks, peak-a-boo behind cover. Historically this is inaccurate for warships and on top of it, forward and reversing ships on the drop of a dime is just ridiculous even for arcade play.

Whatever cruiser or BB gets spotted first gets hard targeted by multiple reds. The hangers back are waiting till they can get free shots without retaliation. Hanging at perfect range while their allies get burnt down. It's pretty selfish, must be a millennial thing.