February 17, 2009

Burris unscripted: More details about Blagojevich contacts

U.S. Sen. Roland Burris has offered a more detailed explanation of his actions amid the renewed furor over his appointment, saying he is worried the media is destroying his reputation. Talking to reporters who caught up to him after a Peoria Democratic dinner Monday night, he provided new details about fundraising conversations with the brother of ousted Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

He also talked about why he decided to offer an affidavit to state lawmakers after failing to mention his contacts with key Blagojevich insiders during his sworn testimony to the committee that recommended impeaching the Democratic governor.

While his attorney, Timothy Wright, interjected and interrupted questions from the media at a contentious Sunday news conference in Chicago, an at-times emotional Burris went for a long time Monday night when reporters talked to him after the Peoria Democrats Presidents' Day dinner--his second stop on a five-day statewide listening tour.

Here is a partially edited transcript of Burris' comments, which did not necessarily clear up the questions over what happened.

Burris was asked to give the timeline, when he understood there may have been parts he left out from his Jan. 5 affidavit and Jan. 8 testimony to the state House committee investigating the impeachment of the governor.

“The testimony was over. We thought, you know, we’d done a decent job… We then got word on that Sunday night from Sen. Durbin or from somewhere that they were going to check over the information that we had submitted, that came from the Secretary of State.

“I mean, can you all imagine what’s going on now, when the secretary of state wouldn’t sign the petition? And we had to try to deal with all that..."

Q: We watched it on national TV?

“Yeah, right. It was a lot of, a lot of confusion going on. And so we finally--and by the way, we had to deal with the Supreme Court. We’re trying to draft petitions. We’re also trying to draft petitions for the federal court. And (had) to hire all these lawyers. And they were looking at all the law and doing all this research. This is all going on and so we can be prepared to go to court in case they didn’t seat us.

“So now the timeline after that was that we did get the word on that Monday that they had OK’d my appointment, that I would come on down, I would be seated. But then they tried to get in touch with Vice President Cheney and to find out when they could swear me in, and so they decided on Wednesday, but then they changed it and said he couldn’t be available until Thursday. … This is now Thursday Jan. 15. So we went out on Jan. 15, and we stayed in Washington because I was sworn in. And guess what? I had to vote that evening. At 4:30 or 5 o’clock, I had to cast my first vote in the Senate. So now we’re in Washington Jan. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20th was (President Barack Obama's) inauguration. The 21st, I understand from my lawyer who had to leave and go to California, when he got back to the law office, that on the 22nd, the transcript of the trial (meaning impeachment hearing) arrived.

“He reviewed that on the 23rd, I think, and talked to me and said, ‘I thought you said that you had talked to the governor’s brother about fund-raising.' I said, 'Well I did.' He said, 'Well, his name was in the transcript by the, um, by by by (Republican state Rep. Jim) Durkin--we were (under) question, and we didn’t respond to that.

“I said, 'We (did or didn’t, unintelligible) respond to it?' He said, 'no.’ I said, ‘Look, we got to respond to that because that is, you know, because I did talk with him.'"

“He said, 'Well, we can prepare an affidavit, Roland.’ I said, ‘Well, let’s prepare whatever we need to prepare.’ And not only did I respond to him, but then he read off the other names. ‘Well, did you have anything to do with John Wyma?’

"I said, 'Yes.' I talked to John Wyma and Doug Scofield at the June fund-raiser, expressing to them that I was interested in being appointed to the Senate seat. As a matter of fact, I’ll tell everybody I knew that I was interested in getting appointed to the Senate seat. I mean, you know, because I wanted to be a United States senator and I thought I was qualified to be that.

“So we then voluntarily filed that affidavit that then said in part that we had talked to Scofield and Wyma, we had talked to John Harris on another matter, but it was only a question when he was talking about the reference on my nephew that I called him about, seeking to assist him as a reference. And at the end of that conversation with John Harris, who was then the governor’s chief of staff, I said, ‘Is there any progress or any word on the Senate seat?’ You know what his answer was? One word, ‘No.’ And he cut it off.

“So that was my conversation with the governor’s chief of staff. You know, that sent me up a wall. Because I’m now (wondering), If the chief of staff said no, where am I?

“So I then also indicated, and, of course, I talked with, that happened sometime in—I don’t even remember when that was when I talked to John Harris. But I know when it was when I talked to the governor’s brother. The governor’s brother’s on a routine fund-raising call indicated, ‘I am now the new fund-raiser for the governor, and Roland you’ve been helpful for us in the past,’ and I said, ‘Yes, you know, I’ve certainly tried to work with the governor. I’ve tried to help you all. A lot of people didn’t.'"

“And he says, ‘We need to raise some funds. We hope that you could probably get some of your friends together.' I said, ‘What type of money we looking for?’ He says, ‘Can you raise us 10 or 15 thousand dollars?’

“I said, ‘I don’t know but I can’t do it now because we are in the midst of an election. Call me after the election.’ He said, ‘Fine.’"

“So some time shortly after Obama was elected, the brother called. And now in the meantime, I’d talked to some people about trying to see if we could put a fund-raiser on. Nobody was—they said we aren’t giving money to the governor. And I said, ‘OK, you know, I can’t tell them what to do with their money.’"

“So when the brother called me back, I said, ‘Well, look Rob...I can’t raise any money from my friends. I said, maybe my partner and I, you can talk this over and see, could we go to some other people that we might be able to talk to that would help us out if we give--because we give a fund-raiser in the law office, nobody going to show up. We’ll probably have a thousand dollars for you or something to that effect.'"

“Oh, by the way, in that first conversation with him (Rob in October), so that part is where I raise a question about the Senate seat with him. But no other time do we talk about the Senate seat. So then we came back, and when he called me back the third time, because I went to talk to my partner, and we then assessed the situation and said, ‘Look, you know, I’m interested in the Senate seat. I can’t raise any money for him.’ And so he called me back and I told him back and I told him that. I said, 'No. 1, I can’t raise any money for you and I can’t give you any money because I don’t want to have a conflict.' I mean, that should give some indication of my commitment right there to get out of pay to play and they're still trying to tie me in to pay to play.”

Q. Do you think this is amounts to a witch hunt on the part of reporters?

“I don’t want to criticize you all because I’ve been criticized for criticizing you all, and I don’t think that gets me anywhere.

“But I just wish that the reporters would look into this, look at the action that is taken and look at the steps in the process. I mean, I have not done anything wrong. I have not given any money. I have not even raised any money. So this whole thing is because of the governor’s problem with trying to sell the seat.

“So if I didn’t give any money, I didn’t raise any money, why would I be having the problems that I’m having? Someone please explain that to me.”

Q: You’re a very bright man and you have served Illinois very well throughout the course of your lifetime?

“Yes.”

Q: You understand, though, how people in the state of Illinois are kind of feeling a rebuke, though, from the process?

“I think that that’s because some of that has come from the media about not being fair to me. The media has not said how I, in the statement, about how, you know, that they tied in, (they) say, well, 'Burris said, here give you money. But he’s dealt with his brother, (it’s) pay to play….'"

“So that’s confusing the public. And the public know me. I mean, I met with some ministers this morning. And they’re saying what is going on? We know Roland Burris hasn’t done anything wrong.

"But the media now is almost destroying my character because they’re not accurately reporting what really transpired. And I think, and I’m not, and I say this, and I get into trouble… But it’s continued to make the thing go.”

Q: Clarify when the last two calls with Rob were?

"They were in November after the election… about Nov. 10th and about Nov. 15th or 16th.

Comments

How "Republican" of Mr. Burris. All we need now is for Vice President, Joe Biden to get drunk, and shoot somebody (Cheney).

"Enough", Mr. Burris should apologize to the people of Illinois, and resign. I don't know if he has done anything wrong, but it certainly looks that way. This could have been avoided if he had just let the process run it's course. Who knows? He might have been appointed to the seat eventually. NOOOOOO, he had to make a spectacle of himself as he went charging up to the Senate doors with cameras flashing. I hope it was worth the embarrassment that he has put us as Democrats, through.

I am for what is right, and Mr. Burris, like most Republicans, :) , is wrong.

Splitting hairs between being "completely honest" and "honestly complete." He knew damn well if he would have been honestly complete it would have been enough of a shadow to prevent him from being seated in the Senate. It doesn't matter if he committed purgery or not, or whether he actually engaged in pay to play or not. He deceived the people of Illinois, and he does not deserve to represent us in the U.S. Senate.

I would feel bad for this guy were I operating on the assumption that he was just a conscientious public servant who stepped up out of civic duty when tapped, but actually, I think Mr. Burris is just the guy who stayed in the dog race when all others saw the FBI at the finish line and turned tail.

This kind of guy doesn't give up because it's for the good of the state, or because he wants to restore integrity to the office. This kind of guy only gives up when someone offers him something of greater value.

watch the lemmings follow there Socialist leader over the cliff....
taste the kool-aid...
CHANGE is all around us....
YA ! ... and I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you..
what a 'lying little sneak'
the stench is becoming overwhelming...
and Durbin supports this unprincipled, arrogant, self-serving skunk 100%

Apparently he's conveniently forgotten his Jan. 5th affidavit? Compare his statement there with the more recent one. Looks like a contradiction to me.
----------
Jan 5th Affidavit, filed with the Cook County Court
(avail. at http://www.dailyherald.com/pdf/burrisaffidavi... )
----------
11. Prior to the December 26, 2008 telephone call from Mr. Adams, Jr., there was not any contact between myself or any of my representatives with Governor Blagojevich or any of his representatives regarding my appointment to the United States Senate.

----------
Feb. 4th Affidavit, filed with the Cook County Court
(avail. at http://www.dailyherald.com/story/... )
----------
3. On June 27, 2008, I attended a fundraising event for then-Governor Blagojevich, at which I encountered Doug Scofield and John Wyma. During that event, I likely asked Mr. Scofield and/or Mr. Wyma to tell Governor Blagojevich that I was interested in filling now-President Barack Obama’s Senate seat if he were to be elected President of the United States.

4. During the first conversation I asked Rob Blagojevich what was going on with the selection of a successor if then-Senator Obama were elected President, and he said he had heard my name mentioned in the discussions. In 1 of the other conversations (I believe the last one), I mentioned the Senate seat in the context of saying that I could not contribute to Governor Blagojevich because it could be viewed as an attempt to curry favor with him regarding his decision to appoint a successor to President Obama. I did not raise or donate any funds to Governor Blagojevich after the fundraiser on June 27, 2008.

5. In October, 2008, I attempted to contact John Harris via telephone to give a recommendation for my nephew who had applied for a job with the State of Illinois. Mr. Harris was unavailable and I left a voicemail message for him. Approximately three weeks later, Mr. Harris called and I discussed with him my nephew’s qualifications for the job with the State of Illinois. At the conclusion of the conversation, I inquired as to the whether there was any news regarding then-Governor Blagojevich’s possible picks to fill President Obama’s Senate seat. Mr. Harris indicated that there was no news as to President Obama’s replacement.

6. Before the November election I also called Ed Smith, a friend and supporter of then-Governor Blagojevich. Although I do not consider Mr. Smith closely related to or a representative of Governor Blagojevich, I mention for completeness that I asked Mr. Smith whether I had any chance to be appointed to the Senate seat.

Burris is among the the worst and stupidest of them. He knew what the questions were about, and now he's pointing towards his lawyer. Why did he even need a lawyer for those interviews?, that's the question in my mind. We don't need any senators that can't speak for themselves. He said his attorney was there in case he had to sue for the senate seat, isn't that disgusting? Just once I'd like to see a polititian do something for their constituents, instead of to them. Burris was also against the Con Con, he was one of them that said the system works well enough, yeah...for him.

He boast on his "tombstone resume" that he was the AG in Illinois yet he dosn't answer questions honestly after being sworn in... he knew the purpose of the Senate trial was to find out if Blagojevich made him an offer and he pretends that he was unprepared yet he was thoughtful enough to bring his lawyer...Keep blaming the press for you being a lying, cheating, conniving coward Roland.

All 50 aldermen on the Chicago City Council had to file paperwork earlier this year detailing their outside income and gifts. The Tribune took that ethics paperwork and posted the information here for you to see. You can search by ward number or alderman's last name.

The Cook County Assessor's office has put together lists of projected median property tax bills for all suburban towns and city neighborhoods. We've posted them for you to get a look at who's paying more and who's paying less.

Past posts

Clout has a special meaning in Chicago, where it can be a noun, a verb or an adjective. This exercise of political influence in a uniquely Chicago style was chronicled in the Tribune cartoon "Clout Street" in the early 1980s. Clout Street, the blog, offers an inside look at the politics practiced from Chicago's City Hall to the Statehouse in Springfield, through the eyes of the Tribune's political and government reporters.