A Sikh decision-making body has divided not only the Sikh community, but polarised the rich and immensely meaningful spectrum of Sikh thought.

Last weekend, the President of India gave his nod to
the amendment to the Gurdwara Act 1925. The law barring Sehajdhari Sikhs –
those who practice the faith without strictly adhering to its five basic tenets
–
from voting in the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabhandak Committee elections has come
into effect retrospectively from October
8, 2003. This means that the last two elections of the top Sikh decision-making
body, which were invalidated by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, have also gained legal
sanction.

The SGPC has twisted the definition of a Sehajdari,
and the body’s stated definition of a Patit – a person initiated into the
religion but who violates its precepts – has resulted in the systemic exclusion
of a large number of community members from the Sikh religion.

Sikh religious bodies have adopted a patronising
attitude in response to recent discussion on social media and in political circles.
They say that Sikhs with
trimmed
hair are only barred from contesting elections
– the gurdwaras do not forbid them from visiting.

Of course they don’t. The religious
bodies run on donations from Sehajdaris and people from other religions. Why
would the gurdwaras give up on the funding they receive from 70 lakh Sehajdaris,
which is a third of the Sikh community?

In truth, most Sikhs do not care much for the SGPC
elections. They visit the gurdwara because of their faith, not to score
political brownie points. They believe that the SGPC uses their dasvandh –
contribution of one-tenth of their earnings as per Sikh tradition – for the
cause of the community.

Evolved practices

The divide and politics today does not do justice to the religion's origins. The term “Sikh” means shishya, or student. The name of
the religion itself is open and inclusive to everyone who wishes to learn.

In popular understanding, male Sikhs take the name
Singh and women adopt the name Kaur. However, the first nine Gurus did not
conform to that nomenclature.

They had names such as Dev, Das, Rai and Kishen. They may
or may not have grown long hair, and there are no records, despite what calendars and
art portraying the Sikh Gurus depict. The changes in Sikh philosophy – the
followers taking up arms –
came in with Guru Hargobind, the sixth Guru. The codification
in attire and the five articles of faith were introduced by Guru Gobind, the
tenth Guru.

Guru Gobind bequeathed the Sikh holy book, the Guru
Granth Sahib, as the immortal Guru to the followers who by now had become a
community –
Khalsa. The Holy Book does not define the Sehajdhari, Keshdhari or
Amritdhari Sikh.

To understand this, consider a large pool of people
roughly 500 years ago, who inspired by the teachings of Guru Nanak Dev and the
Gurus that followed, gradually give up the rigid caste practices of Brahmanism
and the codified rituals of idol worship, and moved towards a deeper
understanding of the idea of god echoed by 15 great poets from across the
Indian subcontinent.

These poets, by birth, are Muslims, Hindus, and
from various castes including Dalits. All of them are in the Sufi/Bhakti tradition, which
demolishes narrow sectarian religious boundaries. However, regional rulers and
orthodox zealots prosecute these ever-growing people. Feeling the need to
defend themselves and rise against injustice, Guru Gobind created a band of
armed warriors –
the Khalsa, or the pure. The Khalsa is a sub-sect of the
Sikhs. Like any army, it has its codes – and codes define armies.

Identity defined

So how did the Khalsa’s code became the norm
for the larger Sikh community? There is a lot of history involved, but another court case provides insight into the current game plan of the
SGPC.

In May 2009, the Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled in a landmark case on defining Sikh identity. A SGPC-run medical institution, Sri
Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in Amritsar, denied
admission to a young student, Gurleen Kaur, for its MBBS course because she had
plucked her eyebrows and was hence “no longer a Sikh”. The institute enjoyed
minority status courtesy a Punjab government notification, which enabled the
SGPC to reserve 50% of its seats for Sikh students.

Given the sensitive nature of the matter, the court
summoned not only lawyers but also Sikh intellectuals and scholars to
deliberate. After listening to an array of views, the court concluded that it
could take a decision on Sikh identity only according to the Sikh Rehat-Maryada – code of conduct and
conventions.

The judgement reads:

‘...they all lead to one unambiguous answer, namely, that maintaining hair unshorn is an essential component of the Sikh religion.’

‘... even an act of dishonouring hair is taken as a tabooed practice. An act of dyeing one’s hair is treated as an act of dishonouring hair. It would, therefore, not be incorrect for us to conclude, that maintaining hair unshorn is a part of the religious consciousness of the Sikh faith.’

The decision cost Gurleen Kaur her seat at the
college. The verdict was hailed worldwide, especially in the diaspora, where
the Sikh community is engaged in legal cases with foreign governments over the
issue of the turbans. However, the court’s decision also split the Sikh
community.

Syncretic past

It is clear that the SGPC has divided not only the Sikh community,
but polarised the rich and immensely meaningful spectrum of Sikh thought by
making followers choose between the legacy of Guru Nanak and Guru Gobind.

In 2008, the SGPC disallowed Bhai Ghulam Mohammad Chand, a descendant of Guru
Nanak’s life-long friend and musician Bhai Mardana –
arguably the first Sikh –
from singing a devotional song in the Golden Temple because he was not Amritdhari.

A few days ago, on Facebook, noted Punjabi writer Waryam
Singh Sandhu told the story of Bhai Des Raj from his village Sur Singh. In 1762,
Ahmed Shah Abdali had destroyed the Golden Temple and filled up the sarovar,
pool of nectar, with human and animal carcasses. In two years, the Sikhs
collected money and asked Sikh leader Jassa Singh Ahluwalia to lay the foundation stone of
the Temple.

The community gave the responsibility of constructing the
current Golden Temple to Gur-Sikh khatri moneylender Bhai Des Raj (Gur-Sikh
means the person is a Sikh of the Guru even if he is not practising Sikh). With
the current ruling, even Bhai Des Raj won’t be eligible to vote. Neither would
one of the most famous poets of Guru Gobind’s durbar, Bhai Nand Lal, be
eligible. Nor would Bhai Kanhaiya, well known for responding to Guru Gobind
when asked why he serves water to the enemies: “I only saw human beings. Have
you not taught us to treat all God’s people as the same?”

There are thousands of such stories of the togetherness of
spirit and the syncretic nature of Sikhism thought that are lost on current
politicians and merchants of religion.

Split wide open

The current controversy dates back to 1999 –
when the
Sikhs celebrated the 300th anniversary of the formation of Khalsa.
At that time, the lines in community were clear: Shiromani Akali Dal was the
political face of the community and SGPC, under its President Gurcharan Singh
Tohra, was the religious face.

Sehajdharis were allowed to vote in SGPC elections. That
same year, the Shiromani Akali Dal's Parkash Singh Badal finally managed to push out Tohra and gained
control of SGPC, and with the Bharatiya Janata Party government in power, the
SGPC soon made a case for barring Sehajdharis. This is how one right wing –
the
rigid Sikhs –
played into the hands of another right wing, the Hindutva forces.

These two rulings –
the Gurleen Kaur case and the
amendment to the Gurdwara Act –
have clearly established the divide in the
community ever since political and religious power got concentrated in the
hands of the Badals.

According to SGPC’s definition
in 2008, those born in Keshdhari families but have chosen to not keep their
hair long are Patit –
apostate or degenerate. They are no longer Sikhs.

Self-defeatist logic

According to the 2011
census, Punjab’s population was 2.4 crore, of which Sikhs comprised about
60%. The SGPC listed 5.5 million Keshdhari voters –
a third of the Sikhs in
Punjab –
as real Sikhs.

The rest of the Sikhs, above 70 lakh in Punjab alone
and approximately 1 crore worldwide, who have ever touched a scissor to their
bodies, are Patits. This also satisfies another question that the Supreme Court
has asked in January this year on another admissions-related case:
Is Sikhism a minority religion in Punjab? The answer is a resounding yes and SGPC
will enjoy the benefits owing to its minority religion status. Punjab, where a
religious minority was a majority, has lost its unique status in the process.

The irony of a Sikh community, known much beyond its
numbers for its service and egalitarianism, is that it fights its identity
battles in the courts of a secular country and ends up losing in the real sense
when it thinks it is winning court battles.

In the 1960s, the Akalis agitated for a Punjabi language
state and got a Punjab which is one-seventh of the original region. The
cartographers of the nation state carved out Haryana and Himachal Pradesh from
their territory. Now, the SGPC has hard-defined Sikhs and the courts have given
them a third of the community in Punjab and maybe half of the community worldwide.
The rest have lost their identity. What can be more self-defeatist than the
beauty and magnificence of a religion being reduced to whether its
practitioners have unshorn hair –
faith being reduced to a bodily artefact.

The reductive logic in both cases and the definition
by those who manage one of the most modern religions in the world is galling.
Instead of getting court rulings and decisions, fighting and contesting a
battle of faith in front of modern law that goes by logic of arguments, if the
SGPC has an iota of decency and honesty, let them publicise widely that Patits
and Sehajdharis are no longer Sikhs. That the children born in Sikh families
have to keep long hair to qualify as a Sikh and they should not donate to the gurdwaras.
Would they ever do that? Your guess is as good as mine.

The right machine can save water, power consumption, time, energy and your clothes from damage.

In 2010, Han Rosling, a Swedish statistician, convinced a room full of people that the washing machine was the greatest invention of the industrial revolution. In the TED talk delivered by him, he illuminates how the washing machine freed women from doing hours of labour intensive laundry, giving them the time to read books and eventually join the labour force. Rosling’s argument rings true even today as it is difficult to deny the significance of the washing machine in our everyday lives.

For many households, buying a washing machine is a sizable investment. Oddly, buyers underestimate the importance of the decision-making process while buying one and don’t research the purchase as much as they would for a television or refrigerator. Most buyers limit their buying criteria to type, size and price of the washing machine.

Visible technological advancements can be seen all around us, making it fair to expect a lot more from household appliances, especially washing machines. Here are a few features to expect and look out for before investing in a washing machine:

Cover your basics

Do you wash your towels every day? How frequently do you do your laundry? Are you okay with a bit of manual intervention during the wash cycle? These questions will help filter the basic type of washing machine you need. The semi-automatics require manual intervention to move clothes from the washing tub to the drying tub and are priced lower than a fully-automatic. A fully-automatic comes in two types: front load and top load. Front loading machines use less water by rotating the inner drum and using gravity to move the clothes through water.

Simple steps to get the best from your washing machineSimple steps to get the best from your washing machineSimple steps to get the best from your washing machine

Size matters

The size or the capacity of the machine is directly proportional to the consumption of electricity. The right machine capacity depends on the daily requirement of the household. For instance, for couples or individuals, a 6kg capacity would be adequate whereas a family of four might need an 8 kg or bigger capacity for their laundry needs. This is an important factor to consider since the wrong decision can consume an unnecessary amount of electricity.

Machine intelligence that helps save time

In situations when time works against you and your laundry, features of a well-designed washing machine can come to rescue. There are programmes for urgent laundry needs that provide clean laundry in a super quick 15 to 30 minutes’ cycle; a time delay feature that can assist you to start the laundry at a desired time etc. Many of these features dispel the notion that longer wash cycles mean cleaner clothes. In fact, some washing machines come with pre-activated wash cycles that offer shortest wash cycles across all programmes without compromising on cleanliness.

The green quotient

Despite the conveniences washing machines offer, many of them also consume a substantial amount of electricity and water. By paying close attention to performance features, it’s possible to find washing machines that use less water and energy. For example, there are machines which can adjust the levels of water used based on the size of the load. The reduced water usage, in turn, helps reduce the usage of electricity. Further, machines that promise a silent, no-vibration wash don’t just reduce noise – they are also more efficient as they are designed to work with less friction, thus reducing the energy consumed.

Customisable washing modes

Crushed dresses, out-of-shape shirts and shrunken sweaters are stuff of laundry nightmares. Most of us would rather take out the time to hand wash our expensive items of clothing rather than trusting the washing machine. To get the dirt out of clothes, washing machines use speed to first agitate the clothes and spin the water out of them, a process that takes a toll on the fabric. Fortunately, advanced machines come equipped with washing modes that control speed and water temperature depending on the fabric. While jeans and towels can endure a high-speed tumble and spin action, delicate fabrics like silk need a gentler wash at low speeds. Some machines also have a monsoon mode. This is an India specific mode that gives clothes a hot rinse and spin to reduce drying time during monsoons. A super clean mode will use hot water to clean the clothes deeply.

Washing machines have come a long way, from a wooden drum powered by motor to high-tech machines that come equipped with automatic washing modes. Bosch washing machines include all the above-mentioned features and provide damage free laundry in an energy efficient way. With 32 different washing modes, Bosch washing machines can create custom wash cycles for different types of laundry, be it lightly soiled linens, or stained woollens. The ActiveWater feature in Bosch washing machines senses the laundry load and optimises the usage of water and electricity. Its EcoSilentDrive motor draws energy from a permanent magnet, thereby saving energy and giving a silent wash. The fear of expensive clothes being wringed to shapelessness in a washing machine is a common one. The video below explains how Bosch’s unique VarioDrumTM technology achieves damage free laundry.