As most fighters in the sport, Michael “The Count” Bisping tells Jack Brown that he would of course like to avenge all his losses. Those losses he refers to are his ‘B.S.’ loss to Wanderlei Silva, the painful KO loss to Dan Henderson, and his most recent TKO loss to Vitor Belfort. Bisping doesn’t just simply admit his desire for the fight, but uses the question as a spring-board to rile the competition and media.

“I’d like to rematch everyone I ever lost to. I’d like to fight Wanderlei again after that bullshit victory he had against me. I’d like to fight Chael again. Even he said I won that fight. I’d fight Rashad. I’d fight Henderson again too. He beat me fair and square, but I still want to fight him again. Obviously I can’t do anything without that fight coming up, seeing pictures of it on message boards. And, of course, I’d like another fight with the Bible-bashing Vitor Belfort, Vitor the boring bastard Belfort.” – Jack Brown

“The Count” does still have his target set on Alan Belcher for UFC 159 on April 27th in Newark, New Jersey. The Brash Brit also had this to say on his game-plan for his upcoming fight.

In my next fights, I’m going back to how I used to fight. I’m going to do spinning back-kicks. I haven’t been doing spinning back-kicks in the UFC. And I don’t give a f— if you put that in the interview. I’m going to kick Alan Belcher’s ass no matter what he does.

I think he deserves a rematch with all these guys, not sure why he’d want to lower himself there though. Without his TrT a little girl would stand a good chance against Belfort. If Belcher beats Bisping, then and only then will I agree that he sucks as all you arrogant Yanks think.

da da da darryl, the phrase is bible thumping period. vitor is evangelical as shit. by definition he’s a thumper. last time i checked bashing doesn’t come close. just ask webster. apologies to caged insider tho because i should have read the quote because bisbing said it not caged insider…