This is from John Green’s Crash Course series on US History. It gives an account of the rise of modern US conservatism, but I’m not sure how conservatives and libertarians will agree with this account. I think it’s interesting because it’s useful in framing the current ideological divides. The video starts off with Goldwater and segues to Nixon. While many might argue that current conservatism owes its roots to the founders or that the video ignores the 1920s (as evident in some of the YouTube comments), I think that Goldwater and the 1960s represents a good point of departure for modern US conservatism, since it represented a deterioration of the Democratic “solid South” and sets up the current political landscape.

What’s instructive here is how it explains how policy and politics aren’t independent of popular opinion. So, not all of Nixon’s policies are “conservative” (e.g., The EPA), as the Nixonian conservatism was embedded in a particular historical circumstance. While the “Silent Majority” who elected Nixon wasn’t happy with the social direction of the country, there was hardly a wholesale reduction of the federal government to pre-WWI levels.

Going beyond the video, I think that there are three distinct eras in modern conservatism. The rise of Nixon in 1968 (who lost in 1960 to Kennedy in the general election) was a backlash against the counter culture, in all of its manifestations. The rise of Reagan (who lost to Ford in the 1976 primaries) was not only a backlash against Carter, but brought together the anti-Communist stance of Goldwater, a move towards laissez-faire economic policy, and a social conservatism. Newt Gingrich’s 1994 “Contract with America” (which didn’t feature a social conservative stance) brought both houses of Congress under control of the GOP, but it signaled a divide: the “country club” Republicans versus the socially conservative populists. While George W. Bush managed to squeak by in 2000 with the help of the Supreme Court, he had a little more breathing room in 2004, winning with a “War on Terror” = “War in Iraq” messaging. He managed to keep together a coalition of social conservatives and fiscal conservatives, which fell apart by 2006 and evident in his nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

The fragmented state of the GOP is an interesting case because the party cannot contain the ideologies of its factions. Strong leadership may remedy this, but perhaps only to a point. What the conservative factions want and popular opinions on issues such as taxes, deficits, regulation, income inequality, minimum wage, abortion/reproductive rights, guns, entitlements, gay marriage, and immigration create too many possible failpoints for Presidential candidates and legislators.

While 2016 presidential election is a far off on the horizon, I’m not the first to point out that the Republican who wins (since 1968, after the South realigned) had his challenger come from the middle:

1968: Nixon, challenged by Nelson Rockefeller

1972: Nixon, challenged by Pete McCloskey

1980: Reagan, challenged by George Bush

1988: George Bush, challenged by Bob Dole

2000: George W. Bush, challenged by John McCain

I’m not sure what a 2016 “most conservative electable candidate” looks like, but looking at a likely rough primary fight and swing state math, they’re not in an enviable position.

Comments 3

John Lofton — January 26, 2014

FORGET, PLEASE, modern “conservatism.” It has been a failure because it has been, operationally, de facto, Godless. In the political/civil government realm it has ignored Christ and what Scripture says about the role and purpose of civil government. Thus, it failed. Such secular conservatism will not defeat secular liberalism because to God they are two atheistic peas-in-a-pod and thus predestined to failure. As Stonewall Jackson's Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:

”[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn.

“American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth."

In any event, “politics,” for the most part today, is whoring after false gods. It will not save us. Our country is turning into Hell because the church in America has forgotten God (Psalm 9:17) and refuses to kiss His Son (Psalm 2.) See, please, 2 Chronicles 7:14ff for the way to get our land healed.

klientol — September 3, 2015

The webpage is the great rest to showcase novel crop, unique ideas, ready to lend a hand armed forces, and so forth. Today, in attendance are perhaps billions of webpage on the Internet from approximately the world. The two nearly all effectual habits to get citizens to access and look on one’s webpage are through ads and explore engines. Just like introduction ads on Box, newspapers, billboards, etc., citizens can expend currency to place ads of their webpage on well-liked WebPages visited frequently by the others. The ads will live in hyperlink which when it is clicked, will robotically through the web browser to the ads’ website and display the webpage.
Using the search engine to straight citizens to your webpage is free excluding requires a little try lying on your part. There are three admired investigate engines (Bing, Google, and Yahoo) that the wide-ranging communal uses to appear intended for information. Search engine employs enormous central processing unit income to explore billions of WebPages on the Internet to get the information that people query. Basically, the investigate is conducted in the following sequences:
1) A uncomplicated software routine called spiderbot is sent not in to the Internet to crawl the webpage sites stored in the search engine’s Doman Name Database (DNdb). To expedite the crawling, quite a lot of spiderbots may live worn by the side of the identical time.
2) The spiderbot next extracts the keywords in the webpage’s HTML source policy. It updates the DNdb with the keywords connected with the webpage.
3) The spiderbot afterward goes to the subsequently webpage site in the DNdb. The process can obtain more than a few days to complete every the webpage sites in the DNdb.
4) Steps 1) to 3) are frequent lying on a regular root to make certain that all the WebPages in the DNdb enclose their newest keywords.
So, in sort to have your webpage to live searched, you require to register it with the explore engine to subsist incorporated in its DNdb. Click on the hyperlink underneath to find elsewhere how.
http://parkiety-bydgoszcz.pl
As you type your query in the search engine’s webpage, it extracts the keywords in the query and starts a search in its DMdb. If supplementary than one bout is create, every related webpage information will be alive displayed in the orders according to the webpage’s contented and relevance.