There is so much in your blog that is just verbal diarrhoea. They question Niko’s stability, when all he’s doing is taking the piss. And we have fruitloops like you. I’m not going to go into it here, you’ve asked your ‘followers’ to write to our Prophet so I’ll reciprocate in turn.

I have a question though, and it’s been bugging a few around here. Do you have cake? We were told it’s a lie, but apparently you go for lies so would it be fair to assume you have cake?

In defence of Niko I have been having a bit of a debate with this bloke on his blog. Obviously my questions and points of truth were a bit too much for him, as it seems I have been given the Big Guy treatment, i.e I can’t submit posts anymore.

Please check it out Pastafarians.

What a shame these creationist loonies don’t seem to have the stamina we do for a debate.

I have not yet acquired our holy scriptures, however, I believe I may have an answer for you.

It would seem logical that because our most divine creator is the ethereal embodiment of pasta, then any associated tools of making the physical representation of said deity are therefore sacred. In that case, proudly displaying or wearing such symbols is in keeping with the standard practice of a good number of religions.

I’m on some pretty good painkillers, so let me know if that makes any sense.

Lettuce apply logic while the pasta bubbles: since there is no objection by the people recognizing Christ at displaying Him nailed to wooden beams and dying, how can there be an objection to the Pastafarian display of the tools of creation?

I don’t think it is prohibited, and among the IRRYD’s there is mention of letting consenting adults do as they please, so it would see to be OK. I also don’t think it is required, but if one is so inspired, and requires it of their self, then it is as good as required.