On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
> > To clarify:
> >
> > The ap-auth-postgresql DEPENDS is postgresql-{6.5.3*,7.0*,lib-*}
>
> In that case, it seems that lintpkgsrc/pkglint needs to be fixed to fully
> understand the {,} syntax, and not moan about it if one component doesn't
> match, while another one does.
It did fully understand the {,} syntax, hence my question in the
original mail:
> Should it just assume that if one entry matches the current package
> then all is OK?
>
> Should we have a file that lists 'obsolete packages that are OK to be
> left as alternatives in DEPENDS'?
I have since implemented the first option.
--
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --