The following has not yet been verified. Please improve it by logging in and editing it. If you believe that is not sufficient to solve the problem, please discuss it with the community on the Talk Page. If you think that this article should be removed, please contact [email protected]

"Whether there's any truth about collusion or not, [Trump] can't add to the narrative"

The businessman behind a sweeping set of U.S. sanctions against Russian officials says that there is little chance the act could be repealed by President Donald Trump’s administration.

The sanctions, known as the Magnitsky Act, gained renewed media attention earlier this year when President Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr., revealed that they were the subject of a meeting he, his brother-in-law Jared Kushner, and Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort had with a Kremlin-linked lawyer in June 2016.

The Magnitsky Act was signed by President Barack Obama in 2012 and places asset freezes and travel restrictions on 44 Russians who have been linked to human rights abuses, allegedly committed on behalf of the Kremlin.

He thinks that the Trump administration might fail to enforce the sanctions.

“There is a possibility that the Trump administration doesn’t enforce the Magnitsky Act while Trump is president,” he said, referring to a report in Foreign Policy magazine, which said that the State Department is closing its office responsible for enforcing sanctions.

“I don’t know how [the Magnitsky Act is] gonna work going forward, [or] if it’s gonna work going forward in the United States,” he says.

He told WikiTribune thatit would require an act of Congress to repeal the legislation: “Which is not gonna happen.”

On October 30, Paul Manafort submitted himself to questioning from the U.S. Justice Department, after special counsel Robert Mueller indicted him as part of his wide-ranging probe into alleged links between the Trump campaign and Russian government. The indictment concerned allegations of tax avoidance, not collusion with the Russian government. (Full story here.)

Browder, who lobbied the U.S. government to adopt the Magnitsky Act, argues that speculation over the Trump campaign’s links with Russia, actually protects the Magnistky Act.

“Whether there’s any truth about collusion or not, [Trump] can’t add to the narrative by doing anything that would be seen to be giving anything away to Russia right now.” – Bill Browder

“Whether there’s any truth about collusion or not, [Trump] can’t add to the narrative by doing anything that would be seen to be giving anything away to Russia right now.”

The act is named after Sergei Magnitsky, Browder’s former lawyer, who uncovered a $230 million fraud, perpetrated by people with links to the Kremlin in 2008. Russian security forces arrested Magnitsky and he died in custody in Moscow, where it is suspected he was tortured and denied medical treatment.

The Russian government has repeatedly lobbied Interpol to place a “red notice” on Browder, on various charges. The latest effort, which occurred less than two weeks ago, included an attempt to turn the tables on Browder, by alleging that he conspired to murder Magnitsky, according to the New York Times. Interpol rejected the request, saying that it was politically motivated.

Earlier this month, Canada passed its own version of the Magnitsky Act. The law will allow for the freezing of assets and visa bans on officials from Russia and other nations considered to be in violation of human rights.

Browder was speaking to WikiTribune for a Q&A that will be published in full soon.

We have no ads and no paywall. If you believe in collaboration to produce quality neutral journalism for everyone, it is important that you sign up to support our work financially. Every penny goes towards improving WikiTribune! Thanks, Jimmy Wales

WikiTribuneWikiTribuneOpen menuCloseSearchLikeBackNextOpen menuClose menuPlay videoRSS FeedShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditFollow us on InstagramFollow us on YoutubeConnect with us on LinkedinConnect with us on DiscordEmail us