From dev-return-13881-apmail-activemq-dev-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org Tue Dec 30 10:46:34 2008
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39008 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2008 10:46:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Dec 2008 10:46:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 98030 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2008 10:46:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97999 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2008 10:46:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Post:
List-Id:
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 97988 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2008 10:46:33 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:46:33 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.8 required=10.0
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:46:25 +0000
Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A38234C4AA
for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <363872530.1230633965688.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:46:05 -0800 (PST)
From: "Maurits Lucas (JIRA)"
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQ-2009) Problem with message dispatch after a
while
In-Reply-To: <1503857571.1227225545425.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48385#action_48385 ]
Maurits Lucas commented on AMQ-2009:
------------------------------------
Ho hum, turns out we had producer flow control disabled in our setup. Switching it on solved the issue, now our tests process all 5.9 million messages correctly and ActiveMQ no longer hangs.
And I think the max value for the inflight counter of 32766 observed in earlier tests is explained by the default prefetch size for topics: 32766.
> Problem with message dispatch after a while
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-2009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2009
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0, 5.2.0
> Reporter: Rajani Chennamaneni
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: consumertest.zip, DispatchMultipleConsumersTest.java, JConsole-screenshot.jpg
>
>
> Messages are not getting dispatched after a while (although it accepts new incoming messages) until restart of the broker. This problem is described in several posts.
> http://www.nabble.com/Pending-Messages-are-shown-in-ActiveMQ-td20241332.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Consumer-Listener-stop-receving-message-until-ActiveMQ-restart-td20355247.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Stuck-messages---Dispatch-issues-td20467949.html
> There was also an issue opened in Spring project for this thinking it was Spring problem.
> http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-5110
> I am not able to reproduce with Junit test case having BrokerService started with in the test case. I guess I am not hitting the right stress conditions this way. But when I run the test case against an externally running ActiveMQ instance backed with oracle database persistence, it is reproducible most of the times. This is not a every time failure situation, it takes more time once than the other.
> I was able to hit this situation of stuck messages on queue using following scenario most of the times:
> 1) Start 2 concurrent consumers for the queue using Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer using cacheLevelName as CACHE_CONSUMER
> 2) Send messages using JMETER 2.3.2 to the queue on ActiveMQ stand alone broker instance with 50 threads looping 20 times.
> 3) After a while, you will notice that Spring logs that no messages are being received but the messages are shown jconsole of ActiveMQ and the database backing it for persistence.
> But in 5.2 RC3, the problem is that it dispatches duplicate messages and does not remove them from broker's database after acknowledge properly.
> Attached test case might help to reproduce when run against externally running stand alone ActiveMQ broker. Another way to see the problem is that try to load test using JMETER by sending messages to a queue with a camel route that moves messages from this queue to another and you will notice that it stops moving after while or copied duplicates in case of 5.2 RC3.
> Sorry about such a huge description but it is a real problem! A different team at our company are having this issue in production with 5.1. They are using it as an embedded broker with derby for persistence.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.