I have this stereotypical troon anarchist as a friend on fedbook (anime/LiS profile pics, puts no effort into even looking trans (you would legit have trouble telling that this guy was a tranny much less a woman), claims to be a “translesbian”, talks about his “girldick”, also claims to be autistic because why the fuck not, etc) and I just straight up snooze his posts half the time (partially because Facebook thinks I want to see everything this guy posts). Just ignore it.

When America goes to shit I hope there's a way we can keep these fuckers there. I don't want them trooning up my fucking country even though they'll probably be murdered by feral youths since it's the UK.

A lot of tranny activists have problems with rad feminism exactly because of this issue. They claim that the US state paid for gender reassignment surgery until an alliance of feminists and conservatives in the early 80s brought an end to it.

In Islamic Iran, they are fine with transsexuals I believe the Iranian state will even pay for it as a “cure” for homosexuality

This is a low-effort, garbage post that already affirms what everyone else here already believes. Delete Facebook because it's fucking terrible and get back to doing something useful with your union instead of coming here to whine about morons who believe in ridiculous shit. This exact thread pops up at least once a month but with slight differences, and every time people here and dumb enough to engage and tell OP the obvious (that these people are stupid and Idpol is dumb).

Hey buddy, if you use 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧reddit🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 then be sure to check out /r/StupidPol and /r/cumtown and /r/FullCommunism and /r/Communism. These are the subs least infected by left liberals and anarkiddies, the first two are anti-idpol. There is hope…

socialism in america and western europe literally just means "acting like a faggot" (sadly)

you could be organising a site-wide strike at a steel mill while preaching to your co-workers about wage theft as you hand out copies of "what is to be done" but if you're not a skinnyfat queer with self-diagnosed PTSD from breaking up with your ex-girlfriend (who has a penis) or some kike wearing too much makeup, obnoxiously high heels, and glasses as big as your oversized nose then honey you aren't doing real socialism

99% of people don't give a shit as long as you don't make it your identity. For example I'm bi but I never talk about it because 99% of the time (now not included), it's just not relevant. Of course LGBT people should be treated equally and free from discrimination.

Love to get half way through signing up for Momentum and then close the window half way when it turns out I'll get passed over for promotions due to being white and male, but won't if I tell them my sexuality. So much for to each according to his ability.

Not saying Clinton didn't fix the DNC or that she even should have been legally allowed to run for president. But Clinton appropriating feminism doesn't automatically make all feminist principles idpol

I hate to say it, but in your last pic Hillary is not exactly wrong, but breaking up the banks would be a step in the right direction. Also lol @ muh Bernie being disrupted by BLM, which is a social movement anyone can say they’re a member of. Weird how you include BLM near a thing on COINTELPRO, because if anything is getting the COINTELPRO treatment it would be BLM, a movement with legitiment grievances only a reactionary would deny. The US government has been systematically targeting any movement for the true betterment of Black people for decades but in the retard brocialist brain Blacks getting upset at being brutalized in internal colonies is a creation of the government.

Autogynophelia is so fucking gross tbh. I can sympathize with gender non-conforming people who experience dysphoria, but for a lot of them it's CLEARLY a fetish. Getting hard when you put on panties and a bra isn't "gender euphoria." Trans women is pretty much blackface for women; there's no way for someone born a man to understand what the experience of a woman is like, and vice versa. You can't just pick and choose how you are socialized.

The idea that being a man or woman can be reduced to a feeling is incredibly idealist, and completely ignores the fact that patriarchal societal relations are a direct result of women's biology and the exploitation of reproductive and emotional labor. Men didn't just get together and decide to start oppressing women all of the sudden.

You realize you got baited into idpol by just participating in that discussion right? And now I'm getting baited into it just to tell you not to get baited into it. Idpol is about nothing more than creating a distraction and wasting your time and energy.

We all are of the opinion that persecution based on sexuality is a bourgeois tactic to divide the proles, but at the same time so is elevating one’s identity based on sexuality and gender above class solidarity. Being anti idpol means being oppose to homophobia and transphobia, because these are themselves forms of idpol.

>I can sympathize with gender non-conforming people who experience dysphoria, but for a lot of them it's CLEARLY a fetish. >Trans women is pretty much blackface for women; there's no way for someone born a man to understand what the experience of a woman is like, and vice versa. You can't just pick and choose how you are socialized.

Trans people often reject their gender socialization at a young age. So you either believe that people suffer from dysphoria are legitimate, or you believe that you can't change genders despite literally decades of scientific evidence suggesting that you can. Also, muh socialized as male is a pretty weak-ass excuse when trans and gay male children are ostensibly never treated like men – ever, except in the rare cases where they have accepting families or they've managed to start passing.

>The idea that being a man or woman can be reduced to a feeling is incredibly idealist, and completely ignores the fact that patriarchal societal relations are a direct result of women's biology and the exploitation of reproductive and emotional labor.

I've heard people use "class reductionist" to describe Marxists who want to see revolution, but it really seems to fit here when you don't have the slightest understanding of how patriarchy affects everyone, not just cis women. But playing the victim when material realities suggest you're not at the bare bottom of society reeks of privilege if I ever saw it.

>Getting hard when you put on panties and a bra isn't "gender euphoria."

I'm honestly convinced this is something radlibs made up to dunk on trans people, which is why all the Reddit posts that find their way here have like three upvotes max.

It shows you've been fighting a strawman because you're retarded and apparently needed what I said rewording to ESL friendly tier phrases for your simple mind to wrap itself around my Jupiterian thoughts.

What is this, 2013 /m/? The best part is you've been having an autistic shit-fit about a sentence you were literally unable to understand instead of being able to read it. Let me spell it out for you so your learning disability won't get in the way:

wHy DoN't We TrY cOnVeRtInG gAy PeOpLe To CoMmUnIsM iNsTeAd Of BlAmInG gAy PeOpLe FoR bEiNg DiScRiMiNaTeD aGaInSt

>but he said the n word

You're deluded if you think half this board isn't expatriated from /pol/

>making sweeping statements about groups isn't an example of prejudice against that group

It's like you're so retarded you cannot understand that I want them to stop wrecking and the only reason "most" Americans now oppose them (which wasn't true several years ago) is because they're the most confrontational and insufferable cunts in the English speaking world - the primary way that they engage in wrecking.

>You're deluded if you think half this board isn't expatriated from /pol/

The eternal redditor strikes again.

>>making sweeping statements about groups isn't an example of prejudice against that group

>It's like you're so retarded you cannot understand that I want them to stop wrecking and the only reason "most" Americans now oppose them (which wasn't true several years ago) is because they're the most confrontational and insufferable cunts in the English speaking world - the primary way that they engage in wrecking.

Are you retarded or did you actually write that thinking that you weren't proving my point?

The only hurt feelings here seem to be from a pair of liberal retards who are upset they're getting called out for the major contribution of the "LGBT community" in recent years being little more than wrecking, wrecking and wrecking.

Probably like 80% bi and 5% trans. Bisexuality is pretty “normal” (in terms of occurence) in the general population whether they admit it or not but I’m sure trannies are overrepresented on imageboards

this is why we need a screening process: a test for socialist I.Q. (tests knowledge of socialism, like 'define socialism in your own words', 'who was the first person to call themself an anarchist', etc entry-level questions every socialist should know, and a dress code like that other anon said.

if they fail the requirements they must take a couple of course, provided by the socialist org, free of charge and by a senior member, to train them, retake the test and if pass be allowed into the org. lets be honest, walk-ins quickly fill up with liberals. We need a screening process people, come the fuck on.