Actress Anjali goes missing

After actress Anjali of Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu fame fled to Hyderabad from Chennai citing harassment by her aunt, Bharati Devi, a shocking new development emerged — the actress went missing.

After actress Anjali of Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu fame fled to Hyderabad from Chennai citing harassment by her aunt, Bharati Devi, a shocking new development emerged — the actress went missing.

After actress Anjali of Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu fame fled to Hyderabad from Chennai citing harassment by her aunt, Bharati Devi, a shocking new development emerged — the actress went missing.

The actress has been missing from the hotel since Monday morning, according to her brother Ravi Shankar. sources reveal that Bharati Devi, Anjali's maternal aunt, had reportedly 'adopted' her when she was 15, and has been managing her career and finances ever since she became an actress.

The actress has been missing from the hotel since Monday morning, according to her brother Ravi Shankar. sources reveal that Bharati Devi, Anjali's maternal aunt, had reportedly 'adopted' her when she was 15, and has been managing her career and finances ever since she became an actress.

The actress has been missing from the hotel since Monday morning, according to her brother Ravi Shankar. sources reveal that Bharati Devi, Anjali's maternal aunt, had reportedly 'adopted' her when she was 15, and has been managing her career and finances ever since she became an actress.

On 9th April 2013, Ravi Shankar spoke to a regional channel and claimed that he has had no access to his sister for some time now. "Filmmakers and media have been calling me, assuming that Anjali is under my shelter. Even the makers of her next film tried to contact me to ask me about her whereabouts. But I was totally clueless about this development and I'm shocked. Bharathi Devi always tried to cut us off from Anjali's life.

On 9th April 2013, Ravi Shankar spoke to a regional channel and claimed that he has had no access to his sister for some time now. "Filmmakers and media have been calling me, assuming that Anjali is under my shelter. Even the makers of her next film tried to contact me to ask me about her whereabouts. But I was totally clueless about this development and I'm shocked. Bharathi Devi always tried to cut us off from Anjali's life.

On 9th April 2013, Ravi Shankar spoke to a regional channel and claimed that he has had no access to his sister for some time now. "Filmmakers and media have been calling me, assuming that Anjali is under my shelter. Even the makers of her next film tried to contact me to ask me about her whereabouts. But I was totally clueless about this development and I'm shocked. Bharathi Devi always tried to cut us off from Anjali's life.

I did not even have her contact number. We always had to contact Bharathi Devi to talk to Anjali. She controlled her life so much that she wouldn't share information about Anjali's remuneration with her!" He further added, "She was a minor until recently and it seems like she waited to turn 18, before deciding to speak up. We plan to register a complaint at the Madhapur police Station. Our family members are devastated," he added.

I did not even have her contact number. We always had to contact Bharathi Devi to talk to Anjali. She controlled her life so much that she wouldn't share information about Anjali's remuneration with her!" He further added, "She was a minor until recently and it seems like she waited to turn 18, before deciding to speak up. We plan to register a complaint at the Madhapur police Station. Our family members are devastated," he added.

I did not even have her contact number. We always had to contact Bharathi Devi to talk to Anjali. She controlled her life so much that she wouldn't share information about Anjali's remuneration with her!" He further added, "She was a minor until recently and it seems like she waited to turn 18, before deciding to speak up. We plan to register a complaint at the Madhapur police Station. Our family members are devastated," he added.

A Tollywood producer, who didn't wish to be named, revealed, "I don't know much about her personal life, but yes, it was Bharathi Devi who was in-charge of everything from Anjali's dates to the movies she signed. We knew that Anjali never had a say in any of those matters."

A Tollywood producer, who didn't wish to be named, revealed, "I don't know much about her personal life, but yes, it was Bharathi Devi who was in-charge of everything from Anjali's dates to the movies she signed. We knew that Anjali never had a say in any of those matters."

A Tollywood producer, who didn't wish to be named, revealed, "I don't know much about her personal life, but yes, it was Bharathi Devi who was in-charge of everything from Anjali's dates to the movies she signed. We knew that Anjali never had a say in any of those matters."

Meanwhile, Sravanthi Kisore, producer of the Telugu remake of Bol Bachchan, which stars Anjali, said, "Anjali was supposed to be on the sets of the film on Tuesday. I was shocked to learn that she is missing. But I'm confident that she will make it to the shoot. She is a wonderful actress and has a bright future ahead. we are all here to help her."

Meanwhile, Sravanthi Kisore, producer of the Telugu remake of Bol Bachchan, which stars Anjali, said, "Anjali was supposed to be on the sets of the film on Tuesday. I was shocked to learn that she is missing. But I'm confident that she will make it to the shoot. She is a wonderful actress and has a bright future ahead. we are all here to help her."

Meanwhile, Sravanthi Kisore, producer of the Telugu remake of Bol Bachchan, which stars Anjali, said, "Anjali was supposed to be on the sets of the film on Tuesday. I was shocked to learn that she is missing. But I'm confident that she will make it to the shoot. She is a wonderful actress and has a bright future ahead. we are all here to help her."

When contacted, director Kalanjiyam, expressed surprise at Anjali's allegations. "I'm really baffled why Anjali dragged my name into this. I don't have any connection with her and her family except for the fact that I introduced her in films. That film (Sathamindri Muthamidu) never saw the light of the day, but her family continued to consult with me on her future projects as a well-wisher," he says. He adds that he was unaware of the fact that Anjali's companion was her aunt and not her actual mother."

When contacted, director Kalanjiyam, expressed surprise at Anjali's allegations. "I'm really baffled why Anjali dragged my name into this. I don't have any connection with her and her family except for the fact that I introduced her in films. That film (Sathamindri Muthamidu) never saw the light of the day, but her family continued to consult with me on her future projects as a well-wisher," he says. He adds that he was unaware of the fact that Anjali's companion was her aunt and not her actual mother."

When contacted, director Kalanjiyam, expressed surprise at Anjali's allegations. "I'm really baffled why Anjali dragged my name into this. I don't have any connection with her and her family except for the fact that I introduced her in films. That film (Sathamindri Muthamidu) never saw the light of the day, but her family continued to consult with me on her future projects as a well-wisher," he says. He adds that he was unaware of the fact that Anjali's companion was her aunt and not her actual mother."

On 9th April 2013, Kalanjiyam reportedly filed a complaint with the Chennai Police to counter the claims made by the actress. He stated that he only tried to help her prosper and that her allegations against him were totally false.

On 9th April 2013, Kalanjiyam reportedly filed a complaint with the Chennai Police to counter the claims made by the actress. He stated that he only tried to help her prosper and that her allegations against him were totally false.

On 9th April 2013, Kalanjiyam reportedly filed a complaint with the Chennai Police to counter the claims made by the actress. He stated that he only tried to help her prosper and that her allegations against him were totally false.