Britain’s General Elections and Brexit: First Salvoes or Just Firing Blanks?

Leaks of the discussion at a dinner between Prime Minister Theresa May and EU Commission President Jean-Claude Junker have provided London with an early warning of the challenges which lie ahead after the 8 June election.

Smoke and mirrors. That’s what the Brexit debate is currently about. Who said what to whom over dinner? How much will they charge us? What do the Europeans think Secretary of State for Exiting the EU David Davis is for?

Brexit matters enormously. For this reason if for no other, every nod, every wink, every whisper, every leak is pored over in excruciating detail. What, then, should we make of the recent kerfuffle resulting from Prime Minister Theresa May’s dinner with EU Commission President Jean-Claude Junker, and how might the 8 June general election affect the Brexit process?

To deal with the dinner first. Obviously, leaks must be treated with caution. Not that, in the current fevered atmosphere of post-referendum Britain, this will prevent leave and remain supporters eagerly seizing on anything that smacks of confirmation of their biases.

Yet even if the account of the meal published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung is wholly accurate, a fundamental disagreement between Junker and May is not necessarily as significant as it may sound.

Formal negotiations are yet to start, and it will not be Junker carrying them out. Moreover, one would expect posturing and positioning to be the order of the day, particularly when, as May knows all too well, spats such as this will probably increase her chances of securing a significantly improved majority in June.

Clearly, there are serious issues to be resolved. How the process will work is one. Brussels has a preference for an ongoing set of technical talks, rather than the heads of state and government driven model that the prime minister seems to favour.

Equally, the dinner – and more particularly the leaking of what transpired – has served to provide a useful lesson to the British side. The negotiations will not, indeed cannot, unfold in secret.

Even if both sides were to commit to trying, not all – indeed arguably none – of the 27 are as centralised or secrecy obsessed as is the British government. And that’s without mentioning the European Parliament.

And finally, of course, all the details about possible British payments, the sequencing of talks on the divorce and on Article 50 and the like still remain to be thrashed out. However, this was always the case and, for all the noises off, that will continue to be the case until the two sides sit down and start to negotiate.

So, it may be premature for gleeful remainers to point to the reports and declare ‘we warned you’. But it is not only they who need to get a grip. Leavers, too, must reconnect with reality.

For one thing, the incident round the Downing Street table has served to puncture the myth that ‘they need us more than we need them’. Little wonder that the rhetoric has shifted to focus on the spiteful Junker.

Equally, it is simply not the case that, when the prime minister increases her majority at the general election, this will shift the balance of power decisively towards us. The election will not enhance Britain’s negotiating strength in Brussels. Indeed, quite the opposite.

As American political scientist Robert Putnam has argued, it is domestic weakness that translates most effectively into enhanced bargaining strength in the international arena. In other words, pointing to domestic constraints is more effective than boasting of domestic freedom of manoeuvre.

At the very most – and this is a function of timing rather than the size of any Conservative majority – the election increases the chance of some kind of transitional deal being agreed.

The prime minister needs Britain to have left the EU by the time she goes to the polls again. A promise to make this happen is central to her campaign in this election.

The fact that the next election will not be until 2022 – as opposed to 2020 under the old timetable – gives her some breathing space.

And this may provide an opportunity. If negotiations on a trade deal are underway (a big ‘if’, as it implies that the outlines of the divorce deal have been agreed) the three-year window between the end of the Article 50 process and the next British poll could serve as an ‘implementation phase’.

This could lessen any economic shock caused by leaving the single market and the customs union, allowing new structures and procedures to be put in place, and businesses to begin to adapt.

The like of Brexit has never happened before. However, everyone knows its consequences will be profound. And so, everything will be over interpreted, everything will be analysed to death. Yet, as the events of the last week show, it is important not to rush to conclusions.

This report looks at the implications of the UK government's decision to take the defence elements out of the National Security Capability Review, which has been underway since July 2017. Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson has made clear that his 'hope' is that the 'Modernising Defence Programme’ (MDP) will be published before the House of Commons rises for the summer recess in July 2018.

Britain’s Nuclear Safeguards Bill overcame its first major hurdle last week and will now undergo further parliamentary scrutiny before receiving Royal Assent later this year. Now is a good time to reflect on the Bill’s necessity and the obstacles it will face.

Pages

Britain’s Nuclear Safeguards Bill overcame its first major hurdle last week and will now undergo further parliamentary scrutiny before receiving Royal Assent later this year. Now is a good time to reflect on the Bill’s necessity and the obstacles it will face.

Prime Minister Theresa May undertakes her long-awaited visit to Beijing tomorrow. It gives London an opportunity to define and shape its relationship with China, and move it beyond behind-the-scenes sniping and grandiose public rhetoric.

The British Prime Minister Theresa May attended her first international forum at the G20 Summit in China between 4-5 September. RUSI Deputy Director-General Professor Malcolm Chalmers and Dr Jonathan...

Corporate

Individual

RUSI members enjoy privileged access to the RUSI Journal, Newsbrief and Defence Systems as well as invitations to our full programme of exclusive members’ lectures and seminars. Members also have access to our renowned Library of Military History and online catalogue.