This video contains a montage of corporate media reports from the morning on 9/11 2001. Multiple people reported bombs going off. You can hear one huge explosion yourself.

At one point a NYC firefighter orders people away from the area because there is a bomb inthe building.

How much proof do you we need to realize that the WTC buildings came down via pre-planted charges and that the corporate media knows this and is part of the cover up?

Please pass this around before Google removes the video.

Jesse Richard - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

TVNL Editor's Comments: 9/11 in Perspective – Flight 93 & WTC7

I wrote about this several years ago and I was lambasted by the 9/11 truth community. Finally yesterday I noticed one person who made the same observation (Mike Rivero of Whatreallyhappened.com, a good friend of ours and not one of the people who lambasted me.) Maybe now we can see the full picture of how the 9/11 events were supposed to unfold. – Jesse Richard, Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

Disclaimer: The following is the “opinion” of the author. However this “opinion” is based on four years of research into the events of 9/11 and four years of full time investigative research into to how the US corporate media control information for the purpose of manipulating and maintaining a cult of false reality. If anyone doubts this claim the author will gladly make his presentation to your group, radio or TV program, school, organization, etc. He will do this free of charge providing travel accommodations are provided. He has an open challenge to every member of the media and will publicly debate anyone on this topic. It is not an issue of bias, it is an issue of deception and it is very easily exposed. You just have to be willing to take a few minutes to learn how to spot the deception!

It has become very clear to many 9/11 researchers that the events of 9/11/01 were planned and carried out by rogues within our own government under the cloak of war games that were being conducted on that very day. It is also clear that many things did not go as planned and this is why there is so much suspicion related to the events. Perhaps if the execution of the plan was perfect fewer people would have been suspicious in the first place and much of the evidence noticed by the 9/11 researchers would have remained unnoticed.

One of the most obvious attention attracting “anomalies” of 9/11 relates to the perfect, unexplained and virtually ignored collapse of WTC7, a 47 story building that was not hit by any airplane.

First some facts: WTC7 building collapsed in perfect controlled demolition form in less than seven seconds. This element of the 9/11 events was not even mentioned in “the bible of the blind” known as the official 9/11 report. As a matter of fact you can read the entire 9/11 Commission report and not even know that there was a WTC7, let alone that in collapsed under such suspicious circumstances. Another interesting little nugget relates to what appears to be a public confession by the owner of WTC7 to the intentional demolition of the building. Larry Silverstein seemed to openly admit to being the person to make the decision to “pull” the building. On public television Silverstein was recorded describing how a decision was made to “pull it”, a term used when a building is imploded via controlled demolition. And the latest little bombshell revelation that only adds to the suspicion surround the collapse of this now infamous building comes in the form of newly publicized news footage from the BBC and CNN clearly exposing the fact that the collapse was anticipated and a detailed explanation of why this building could collapse was prepared for the press in advance, before anyone even knew why or if the building would fall. Not only that but these news organizations reported that the building collapsed almost a half an hour before the building actually did collapse!

Some points: Many people will argue that WTC was damaged and burning quite badly and that alone could cause the building to collapse. This is a reasonable assumption to some extent but it does not take many of the extenuating circumstances into account. Here are some things that have to be taken into account when accessing the reality of the situation: During the day we all heard radio and television reports telling us that the building was under great stress. We were told that the building was “leaning” and would not stay up for long. I suppose that we were being told this because we would need some reason to believe that this building would collapse when in fact it should not have. Well my friends, if the building was indeed “leaning” then why didn’t it tip over? That’s what buildings that lean over too much do. That is what all objects subject to the laws of physics as they currently exist on the planet Earth do when they lean too far over. Why did the core of the WTC7 building collapse first? Watch the video; that is what happened. The first thing that happens is that the penthouse structure dropped into the building followed by what appears to be a complete simultaneous failure of ever single supporting structure located on the same level of the lower portion of the building. Buildings do not collapse like this under any condition and no acceptable explanation has ever been given as to how the building could lean and then collapse in the manner in which it did.

Let me repeat one fact that can not be underemphasized: the warnings describing the building’s pending destruction described a building that appeared to be ready to fall because it was leaning which would have meant that the building would have eventually tipped over or broken like a tree after a lumberjack gives it enough whacks with an axe. The building came straight down, center columns first, from the bottom, on to its own footprint. Repeat: Leaning = tipping over. We were told that the building was leaning.

Now let’s get on to the real question posed by those who refuse to accept the evidence and instead fall back on not believing that Americans would do this or they fall back on the old “why would the Bush administration, or other rogue elements within our government and military do this and leave so much suspicious evidence.” The answer is simple: this was a huge risky operation and it was not completed without problems!

What is becoming clearer to me is that the true intentions of the rogues within our government who conspired to shock and awe the American people into supporting a radical shift in American foreign and domestic policies intended on creating a scenario complete with a plausible reason for the collapse of WTC7. I believe that the planners of 9/11 were going to show these conspiracy theory wackos that WTC7 collapsed for the same reason that WCT1 & WTC2 fell; because a plane hit it! I believe that WTC7 was the actual intended target of flight 93. I believe that flight 93 was, to the surprise of the rogues running the operation, shot down by some true American patriot who was performing his duty. I feel this person slipped by the efforts of the roogues who tried everything in their power to prevent the existing national defense procedures from succeeding.

Had flight 93 hit WTC7 it would have served as an improbable but reasonably plausible explanation as to why all the towers collapsed. Science, witnesses, video and forensic evidence indicate that the main towers were brought down by controlled demolition and not as a result of a plane hitting it or raging fires. But the fact that two towers collapsed as a result of damage done by aircrafts full of fuel slamming into them can surely serve as a reasonable argument as to why these towers came down. WTC7’s collapse on the other hand, has caused people to reach for any explanation they could dream up and believe regardless of how implausible it is! These people look at the scientific plausibility of their theory yet they ignore all of the other suspicious evidence ranging from the comments by Silverstein to the dramatic video evidence to the revealing statements (and documentation) made by members of our government who were tasked with protecting us on that very day.

You should pay close attention to the lack of public, official and media attention to WTC7. Most people do not know that there was a WTC7. Most people don’t know the circumstances in which it collapsed and have never seen video of the collapse. Most people don’t know that this building has already been rebuilt! This seems to be because they did not want to draw attention to this building! It may have caused people to say…what is building 7? They may have started poking around! You would think that rebuilding the first WTC structure would have been a loud statement to the so called terrorists. You would think it would be a symbol of American strength and resolve. And yet the reconstruction of this building went on and was completed with a virtual media blackout and to the surprise of anyone who will eventually find out about this.

You may also ask this question…if the new WTC7 started in 2002 was completed in May of 2006, “when was the project started?” How long does it take to come up with the plans and actually build 52 story building, especially in the footprint of the damage done on 9/11? How long does it take to prepare for construction from the time you decide to build? You may ask yourself if the planning of the new WTC7 was initiated prior to the collapse of the old WTC7.

A last point of note: The explanations given to the 9/11 research community by the people who like to “debunk” this evidence always follows the same pattern: they are always hit and run piecemeal explanations. To my knowledge nobody has ever debunked the entire body of evidence which along with the physical record include means, motive and opportunity. There is a big picture here and this issue must be discussed in a similar scope.

The body evidence indicating the complicity of members of our own government in the events of 9/11 is growing daily. The “debunkers” are starting to sound down right silly. Their apologist explanations are starting to sound like typical “my dog ate my homework” excuses you might hear from a child. As a matter of fact their responses to evidence are just that, excuses, not explanations. They often offer excuses that contradict the comments and admissions of the very people for whom they are providing these excuses!

One thing we must all admit at this time, there are elements of the 9/11 official story that don’t add up; period, end of story. And may I ask the citizens of my country to stop fighting over speculation and start examining the big picture for the big picture may provide a clue as to how the little pieces of evidence fit together! Think about it! – Jesse, Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

Hey! If you believe that the American corporate media are our greatest enemy let the people know how you feel.

"I was responsible for planning, training, surveying, and financing for the New (or Second) Wave of attacks against the following skyscrapers after 9/11: ...Plaza Bank, Washington state"

The Plaza Bank was not founded until 2006 according to their official Web site:

" Founded in early 2006, with a vision of creating the leading commercial bank in the Pacific Northwest, Plaza Bank’s story quickly captured the hearts and passion of some of the region’s leading business minds. From Jack Creighton, former CEO of Weyerhaeuser and United Airlines, to former Seattle Mariner Edgar Martinez, and nationally acclaimed salon operator Gene Juárez, the story of a bank founded to bring “class to the mass” simply could not be contained."

I think we can say for quite certain that whomever is being held as KSM was either caught recently or that his entire confession is a fraud.

What the narrator says about sound travelling on water is true. On a still day on the ocean, you can hear a whisper at 100 yards from another boat, as they talk about you!!!

Near the end of this vid, Richard Siegal, who recorded this, talks about what he saw and heard that those on the other side of the buildings couldn't or that we at home couldn't see either. At the end, the role of hidden military helicoptors is revealed. What they were doing is the mystery.

Thanks GR for all you've done in informing us about your knowledge personal and otherwise of 9/11, as well as these explosions, as I found this after watching the vid you posted.

For comparison- An accoustic analysis of the controlled demo of the Landmark Tower building.- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJmOhpPnuKs&NR=1 Seems eerily similar to the WTC collapse- didn't damage surrounding buildings and fell into it's own footprint- thanks to sound building implosion techniques.

_________________Completely sane world
madness the only freedom

An ability to see both sides of a question
one of the marks of a mature mind