An ongoing question was raised by Bee of Backreaction and thoughts I have had as to the applicability of it's experimental design.

It's difficult to see that while seeing the larger view of a Lagrangian
of the universe is to see such an experiment located "as part and parcel
of the variance in determination of the strength and weaknesses of that
Lagrangian."

So you drive the focus down to the microscopic, and
then to ask, in what case has the photon's journey been of value in the
ascertaining the distance and time, of that photon's journey?

Just trying to orientate perspective in the case of Lagrange, yet we see on the macroscopically that it works.

It
is to orientate the thought experiment in the direction of a
determination of value when assigned to Lagrangian and its limits at
minimal length.

A phenomenological question then about that environment with this application.

On another note then being respective of the drive toward understanding using Higg's,"The
solution is to make the equations more complicated and introduce a
Higgs field, which, once it is non-zero on average, can give the
electron its mass without messing up the workings of the weak nuclear
force.1

Monday, November 26, 2012

Figure 1: Gravitational wave strain and strain sensitivity for a 5 year observation with PTAs.
The red dashed line is the approximate strain sensitivity for current PTAs (11), and the green
dashed line shows the previous estimate for the stochastic signal strength that is currently in
standard use for PTA analyses (13, 14). The dark blue solid line corresponds to our mean
estimate for the stochastic signal strength, with the blue shaded region bound by thin solid
blue lines showing our 95% confidence interval for this estimate, based on the observational
uncertainties of our model parameters. The light blue (△ACD) and cyan (△ABE) shaded
regions show the area corresponding to the square root of the 2 integrand, to be integrated over
logarithmic frequency intervals as in Eq. (3), for our expected SNR of 8, and the SNR of 2
expected from previous estimates (13, 14), respectively. See: The Imminent Detection Of Gravitational Waves From Massive Black-Hole Binaries With Pulsar Timing Arrays

As mentioned in article by Technology Review the idea of previous information as to supplying data would have to be identified in future experiments as confirmations. In this instance information gained from Taylor and Hulse in terms of binary star rotations closeness.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Jeff Lieberman, an MIT-trained artist, scientist and engineer, makes a
scientific argument for mystical experience. He asks us to challenge our
perception of what we are, our relationship to the universe, and our
relationship to one another. Our minds are "thought-generating
machines." What we would happen if we could turn off the machine? If we
could transcend our individual experience of the world?

Three years ago was a turning point in my life, because I finally had everything I thought I needed to be fulfilled, and I still had this voice in my head saying “I’ve got to do more to be happy”. The more that I looked at my own suffering deeply, the more I saw it in every single person around us. We have trouble standing in lines, we’re impatient with our own children. It’s as if we all think the future holds the promise for our fulfillment. I come from a scientific background, and so I wanted to use that background to understand the real root and source of why there is so much suffering. Where it’s led me has totally changed my views of the current scientific paradigm. More importantly than that, it’s changed my views on what it means to be a human being, and to be alive. I want to share this theory with you, and it is way out there, so I ask you to have a critical but open mind for the next 14 minutes, because you might not actually be what you think you are.Transcript from TEDx talk

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Anton Zeilinger heads up the IQOQI lab in Vienna. Photograph by Mark Mahaney.

Zeilinger and his group have only just begun to
consider the grand implications of all their work for reality and our
world. Like others in their field, they had focused on entanglement and
decoherence to construct our future information technology, such as
quantum computers, and not for understanding reality. But the group’s
work on these kinds of applications pushed up against quantum mechanics’
foundations. To repeat a famous dictum, “All information is physical.”
How we get information from our world depends on how it is encoded.
Quantum mechanics encodes information, and how we obtain this through
measurement is how we study and construct our world.Do we create the world just by looking at it?

Professor Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: "The machine, the ghost, and the limits of understanding: Newton's contributions to the study of mind" at the University of Oslo, September 2011. Q&A at 45:33

I push back on the limitations inferred by others so as to direct my mode of operation, "in a question form," so as to move forward and not be stalled in my efforts. I believe I have made clear the difficulties as a logical directed outcome in presentation.

Internet development today asks how evolutionary consequence may be to influence forehead development( ahem......frontal cortex) when thought with regard to full brain used and direction is revealed in the keyboard displayed in the comment box. So while not being a cabby.....your a writer, a journalist. What MRI imaging would actually represent your correlative use of brain research information collection and pathway construction?

Chomsky refers back to this evolutionary inherent trait of human being identification in uteri manifestation. While referencing innate points of discussion it is interesting that such innateness may be limited to block of time or a frame of reference in the evolutionary development of that consciousness.

Chomsky discusses the euclidean direction of development toward the evoking apparent correlation in of historical development. While there is some difficulty as to pointing out this feature in the Amazon tribe child toward such comprehension. A triangle is used and it's comprehension as to the lines of expression is explicit toward the imperfection of that triangle perceived.

Link above brought forward contradictory data in relation to the subject of innateness discussed by Chomsky.

There are a lot of things discussed that are included in the overall discussions I have had with others about how we perceive consciousness and perspectives shared by others that questions how it is that consciousness can be perceived apart from the body. How difficult it would be to make this measure if possible at all?

The empirical methodis generally taken to mean the approach of using a collection of data to base a theory or derive a conclusion in science. It is part of the scientific method, but is often mistakenly assumed to be synonymous with the experimental method. The empirical method is not sharply defined and is often contrasted with the precision of the experimental method, where data are derived from the systematic manipulation of variables in an experiment. Some of the difficulty in discussing the empirical method is from the ambiguity of the meaning of its linguist root: empiric.

The mind body problem is dismissed in this talk below as to demonstrate that the pathway to empirical methods had been established by Newton. For sake of clarity one would have to refer back to Chomsky video to clarify this issue and how we move forward in today's world having arrive at a settled perspective about the mind body problem.

Further to this discussion in terms of the evolutionary the status quo of consciousness has not changed for 50000 years and example to help direct that perspective were raised in the contrast of a baby born in a tribe in the Amazon being raised in our modern day society and function quite well and a baby born in this modern society doing equally as well in the tribe.

Bold emphasized in order to provide a move toward this explanation outside of the NDE consideration... to see the theoretical position adopted and the attempts at an empirical method toward the development of that theory.

In the Q&A part of the lecture there is some correspondence in which a question is asked about this correlation of bits. Chomsky's reference to Wheeler in that context.

UpDate:

Eben Alexander had some response to the idea of neural oscillation as
to explaining away his reason for the NDE and what happened to his
brain when attacked by the E coli. It was his son who suggested to him
that he write of his experience without doing any research on the NDE
until he had finished detailing the experience all in written form. Then
he went out and did his research.

From his new perspective as he looked at the information he found
many things as fluffy and questionable in terms of what happens with the
brain. He had a critical analyses of this. Death by heart attack was
brought up and how the shift to brain wave activity was the decisive
factor as he went through his research.

Sleep
is a naturally recurring state characterized by reduced or absent
consciousness and proceeds in cycles of rapid eye movement (REM) and
non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. The normal order of sleep stages is
N1 → N2 → N3 → N2 → REM. Sleep stages are characterized by spectral
content of EEG, for instance stage N1 refers to the transition of the
brain from alpha waves (common in the awake state) to theta waves,
whereas stage N3 (deep or slow-wave sleep) is characterized by the
presence of delta waves.

My question of consciousness based on this neural oscillation was a
method in determination and function of brain waves in individual and
youths. How one may see the relation of the Near death as a function of
the brain in neural oscillation mode, but as mentioned Eben dismissed
this because his brain was basically dead.

Now as to focus levels and the idea of these gradation of
consciousness induced into synchronization established by resonance, is
of interest to me as to how the brain/consciousness may be characterize
by such rhythms. Hence, featured and attributes expressed in the idea
of those Brain Waves.

The idea of Biofeedback is a useful subject in terms of a measured
response to teach the mind to relax, while recording body temperature,
heart rate and skin conductance.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Image: Event display of candidate event for this ultra-rare decay observed in the LHCb experiment

Scientists
at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, near Geneva, have spotted
one of the rarest particle decays ever seen in nature. The result is
very damaging to new theories like the extremely popular Supersymmetry
(or SUSY for short).

Current
knowledge about the most fundamental matter particles (quarks and
leptons, such as an electron) and the forces between them is embedded in
the so-called Standard Model. The particle masses are a consequence of
their interactions with the Higgs field. Exciting the Higgs field in
particle collisions at the LHC recently resulted in the discovery of the
Higgs boson.

Saturday, November 10, 2012

ARTEMIS-P1 is the first spacecraft to navigate to and perform
stationkeeping operations around the Earth-Moon L1 and L2 Lagrangian
points. There are five Lagrangian points associated with the Earth-Moon
system. The two points nearest the moon are of great interest for lunar
exploration. These points are called L1 (located between the Earth and
Moon) and L2 (located on the far side of the Moon from Earth), each
about 61,300 km (38,100 miles) above the lunar surface. It takes about
14 to 15 days to complete one revolution about either the L1 or L2
point. These distinctive kidney-shaped orbits are dynamically unstable
and require weekly monitoring from ground personnel. Orbit corrections
to maintain stability are regularly performed using onboard thrusters.

Sunday, November 04, 2012

Professor Rosalind W. Picard, ScD is founder and director of the Affective Computing research group at the MIT Media Lab, co-director of the Things That Think consortium, and leader of the new and growing Autism & Communication Technology Initiative at MIT. In April 2009 she co-founded Affectiva, Inc., where she serves as chairman and chief scientist.

Sensor development, helps to direct attention as to how emotion is demonstrated?
Skin Conductance while demonstrate to be measured in one sense ...I
might say that the response in the psychological and physiological
consideration may be seen as if the MRI would showing the neurons....
how else would this be measured that does not smack of the auras that
one would quickly jump too in thought?

Skin conductance response in regular subjects differs when given fair and unfair offers, respectively. However, psychopaths have been shown to have no difference in skin conductance between fair and unfair offers.[2]
This may indicate that the use of lie detectors relying on skin
conductivity gives psychopaths an advantage that non-psychopaths do not
have in criminal investigations.

The quest for me understanding the method by which discussion evolved
with Seth was of interest in regard to EU(emotional units) and UC(units
of consciousness). This detailed to me the need for a foundation
understanding of how consciousness worked. It's emergent functionality
with expression and remembrance. This is also where Karim Nader comes
into the picture.

How would one measure focus levels and share some understanding
toward that foundation approach? Gravity? How would one picture a cloud
around biological demonstration of consciousness and one could have
venture off into the occult. So focus levels become a correspondence to
brain wave considerations?

Also the problem with identifying innateness as a parameter given to
this life only and the evolutionary course of the souls expression.

"Your BS( belief structure) dictates the frame of reference
established for your experience"....not just of the near death
question, but life in general? Maybe this is a postulate in itself that
can be expanded on? Taken to a irreducible summation then maybe we can
go from there?

The only way the reference frame can be changed for an individual is
if it is somehow knocked out of its loop. Paradigmatic changes as if
concerted require revolutions of course and the idea that observations can play a role
is a self indicating permission to individuals to allow themself to
move away from what is holding the mind to its continuous loop.

Often
the outlook on life changes and it does not again need the NDE
experience just to show this is a natural function of "aha" moments and
realizations that allow one to expand that potential to see life
differently then they always have.

You know the opposition to speaking about things that
require a greater perception has been lost in the fact that I have to
keep pushing one to realize how absurd the examples are of when you try to
sound as if you have it in the bag so to speak. It is just as bad as
the perception you keep creating with your smoke, magic, and mirrors. As
bad as securing oneself in the fact that what is spoken by the "Great
Shermer" will help you as a seated perspective about the grasp you have
on reality.

The point about Benoit and Taleb is to show how perception when not
used to its full potential fails to see how the basis of perception has
emergent properties that affect the paradigmatic frame of reference that
one has always held too. With all this talk now I have made comparisons
that regardless of the subject show components of what is natural in
consciousness as to see that birth and death are really natural things
held within our perspectives.

How would you deny the experience of an NDEr in another when this
experience resides in oneself as well?