A. M. Archibald wrote:
>On 05/10/06, Greg Willden <gregwillden at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On 10/5/06, Travis Oliphant <oliphant at ee.byu.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>Perhaps that is the best way to move forward along with the work on a
>>>"pylab" super-package.
>>>>>>>>That is exactly what I want.
>>>>>>What is unsatisfactory about installing numpy+scipy+matplotlib? I've
>found they're generally pretty complete (except where no decent python
>alternative exists).
>>>>>In the end I want a nice collection of functions, logically organized, that
>>let me analyze/filter/plot etc. etc. etc.
>>>>The key for me is "logically organized".
>>>>>>>There is a structure to it, but it's more organic because of the
multiple contributors.
weave should be in NumPy but nobody was willing to step up to maintain
it a year ago. I may be willing to step up at this point. I would
like to see weave in NumPy (maybe not the blitz libraries though...)
I think a hybrid for weave / f2py / ctypes that allows "inlining in
multiple languages" as well as automatic extension module generation for
"already-written" code is in order.
-Travis