While other MediaPost newsletters and articles remain free to all ... our new Research Intelligencer service is reserved for paid subscribers ...

Subscribe today to gain access to the every Research Intelligencer article we publish as well as the exclusive daily newsletter, full access to The MediaPost Cases, first-look research and daily insights from Joe Mandese, Editor in Chief.

Commentary

Influencer Marketing's Downward Ethical Spiral

One of the results of our increasing rejection of advertising is that advertisers are becoming sneakier in presenting advertising that doesn’t look like advertising. One example is native
advertising. Another is influencer marketing.

I’m not a big fan of either. I find native advertising mildly irritating. But I have bigger issues with influencer marketing.

Case in point: Taytum and Oakley Fisher. They’re identical twins, two years old, and have 2.4 million followers on Instagram. They
are adorable.

They’re also expensive. A single branded photo on their feed goes for sums in the five-figure range. Of course, “they” are only two and have no idea
what’s going on. This is all being stage-managed behind the scenes by their parents, Madison and Kyler.

advertisement

advertisement

The Fishers are not an isolated example. According to an article on Fast
Company, adorable kids -- especially twins -- are a hot segment in the predicted $5 billion to $10 billion influencer market.
Influencer management companies like God & Beauty are popping up.

In a multibillion-dollar market, there are a lot of opportunities for everyone to make a quick buck. And the bucks
get bigger when the “stars” can actually remember their lines.

Here’s a quote from the Fast Company article: “The Fishers say they still don’t get many
brand deals yet, because the girls can’t really follow directions. Once they’re old enough to repeat what their parents (and the brands paying them) want, they could be making even
more.”

Am I the only one that finds this carrying the whiff of moral repugnance?

If so, you might say, “What’s the harm?” The audience is obviously there. It
works. Taytum and Oakley appear to be having fun, according to their identical grins. It’s just Gord being in a pissy mood again.

Perhaps. But I think there’s more going on here
than we see on the typical Instagram feed.

One problem is transparency -- or lack of it. Whether you agree with traditional advertising or not, at least it happens in a well-defined and
well-lit marketplace. There is transparency into the fundamental exchange: consumer attention for dollars. It is an efficient and time-tested market. There are metrics in place to measure the
effectiveness of this exchange.

But when advertising attempts to present itself as something other than advertising, it slips from a black-and-white transaction to something lurking in the
darkness, colored in shades of grey. The whole point of influencer marketing is to make it appear that these people are genuine fans of these products, so much so that they can’t help
evangelizing them through their social media feeds.

This -- of course -- is bullshit. Money is paid for each one of these “genuine” tweets or posts. Big money. In some cases, hundreds of thousands of dollars. But that all happens out of sight and out of mind.
It’s hidden, and that makes it an easy target for abuse.

But there's more than just a transactional transparency problem here. There is also a moral one. By becoming an influencer, you
are actually becoming the influenced -- allowing a brand to influence who you are, how you act, what you say and what you believe in. Influencers go in believing that they are in control and the brand
is just coming along for the ride.

This is -- again -- bullshit. The minute you go on the payroll, you begin auctioning off your soul to the highest bidder. Amena Khan and Munroe Bergdorf both
discovered this. The two influencers were cut from L’Oreal’s influencer roster by actually tweeting what they believed in.

The façade of influencer marketing is the
biggest problem I have with it. It claims to be authentic, but it’s actually about as authentic as pro wrestling -- or Mickey Rourke’s face.

Influencer marketing depends on
creating an impossibly shiny bubble of your life filled with adorable families, exciting getaways, expensive shoes and the perfect soymilk latte. No real life can be lived under this kind of
pressure.

Absolutely. I feel a bit guilty in the pleasure I took in watching the recent documenteries on the Fyre Festival on Netflix and Hulu. The entrie sham event was promoted almost exclusively through influencer marketing. The primary promoter went to prison and deservedly so, but why no penalties for the "influencers" who "vouched" for him?

I agree on the influencers and the ROI. Dollar per dollar more companies are going away from influencers and finding better ways to spend their marketing and advertising dollars. Most are building their own databases and doing so with promotions like sweepstakes and coupons. It's far cheaper to publish a sweep than to hire a influencer.

Training little children to say lines that they don't know what it means is like training a dog, except dogs are cuter. native =advertorial, nothing more, nothing less. Paid advertising is paid advertising. If there is a problem with that, then there is a problem with the message and the people /product behind it.