We recommend using backward design to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). The defining hallmark of CUREs is that students in a formal lab course explore research questions with unknown answers that are broadly relevant outside the course. Because CUREs lead to novel research findings, they represent a unique course design challenge, as the dual nature of these courses requires course designers to consider two distinct, but complementary, sets of goals for the CURE: 1) scientific discovery milestones (i.e., research goals) and 2) student learning in cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains (i.e., pedagogical goals). As more undergraduate laboratory courses are re-imagined as CUREs, how do we thoughtfully design these courses to effectively meet both sets of goals? In this Perspectives article, we explore this question and outline recommendations for using backward design in CURE development.

3.HoltCE, AbramoffP, WilcoxLV, AbellDL1969Investigative laboratory programs in biology: a position paper of the Commission on Undergraduate Education in the Biological SciencesBioScience191104110710.2307/1294868http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1294868

4.The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University1998Reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America’s research universitiesState University of New YorkStony Brook, NY

5.National Research Council2000Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learningThe National Academies PressWashington, DC

10.American Association for the Advancement of Science2011Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to ActionNational Science FoundationWashington, DC

11.President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology2012Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematicsExecutive Office of the PresidentWashington, DC

15.WeiCA, WoodinT2011Undergraduate research experiences in biology: alternatives to the apprenticeship modelCBE Life Sci Educ1012313110.1187/cbe.11-03-0028216330573105915http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0028

16.BangeraG, BrownellSE2014Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusiveCBE Life Sci Educ1360260610.1187/cbe.14-06-0099254524834255347http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099

18.BrownellSE, KloserMJ2015Toward a conceptual framework for measuring the effectiveness of course-based undergraduate research experiences in undergraduate biologyStud High Educ4052554410.1080/03075079.2015.1004234http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1004234

19.WigginsG, McTigheJ1998Understanding by designAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum DevelopmentAlexandria, VA

20.AllenD, TannerK2007Putting the horse back in front of the cart: using visions and decisions about high-quality learning experiences to drive course designCBE Life Sci Educ6858910.1187/cbe.07-03-0017175488701885907http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-03-0017

22.Ebert-MayD, DertingTL, HodderJ, MomsenJL, LongTM, JardelezaSE2011What we say is not what we do: effective evaluation of faculty professional development programsBioScience6155055810.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9

23.CorwinLA, GrahamMJ, DolanEL2015Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: an agenda for future research and evaluationCBE Life Sci Educ1411310.1187/cbe.14-10-0167http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0167

33.Estrada-HollenbeckM, WoodcockA, HernandezPR, SchultzPW2011Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific communityJ Educ Psychol10320622210.1037/a0020743215523743087606http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020743

34.BrownellSE, FreemanS, WenderothMP, CroweAJ2014BioCore Guide: a tool for interpreting the core concepts of Vision and Change for biology majorsCBE Life Sci Educ1320021110.1187/cbe.13-12-02334041499http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0233

35.BowmanNA, HillPL2011Measuring how college affects students: social desirability and other potential biases in college student self-reported gainsNew Dir Institutional Res2011738510.1002/ir.390http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ir.390

Supplemental Material

No supplementary material available for this content.

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmbe/10.1128/jmbe.v18i2.1287

2017-05-26

2019-03-21

Abstract:

We recommend using backward design to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs). The defining hallmark of CUREs is that students in a formal lab course explore research questions with unknown answers that are broadly relevant outside the course. Because CUREs lead to novel research findings, they represent a unique course design challenge, as the dual nature of these courses requires course designers to consider two distinct, but complementary, sets of goals for the CURE: 1) scientific discovery milestones (i.e., research goals) and 2) student learning in cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains (i.e., pedagogical goals). As more undergraduate laboratory courses are re-imagined as CUREs, how do we thoughtfully design these courses to effectively meet both sets of goals? In this Perspectives article, we explore this question and outline recommendations for using backward design in CURE development.