(Phys.org) —A small team of researchers with the University of Ulm's Institute of Experimental Ecology in Germany has found an evolutionary explanation for same-sex sexual behavior (SSB) in burying beetles. In their paper published in the journal Biology Letters, the team describes how they tested what is known as Reeve's acceptance threshold theory in male beetles and found that the evolutionary cost of possibly rejecting females was overridden when there were few of them to choose from.

Reeve's acceptance threshold theory suggests that when gender recognition is prone to errors, the likelihood for greater acceptance goes up when there are fewer members of one gender or the other. Put another way, if a male burying beetle has difficulty determining if another beetle is male or female (which is does because gender identification with such beetles is difficult to determine) and if it is clear that there are few females around, than the males become less discriminating and will attempt to mate with whatever female or male beetle they find—because it increases the likelihood of passing on their genes (with male/female copulation, of course).

To find out if the theory holds for burying beetles, which live off the dead carcasses of other creatures, the researchers captured several specimens from a forest in Germany and took them back to their lab. Once there they subjected the beetles to various experiments, where the availability of females for mating with the males was varied. They also varied various resources such as the availability of a dead mouse carcass.

In studying the data, the researchers found that as the availability of females was reduced, the male beetles increasingly became more accepting of both male and female beetles, suggesting that as their chances for reproducing became slimmer and slimmer, they became more likely to mate with any beetle they encountered regardless of its gender, leading to increased instances of SSB. In contrast, the trend was very clearly reduced as more and more females were introduced into containers holding males.

The researchers suggest that their findings indicate that the theory appears to hold for burying beetles, and also demonstrates an evolutionary advantage for an organism to engage in SSB when circumstances warrant.

AbstractSame-sex sexual behaviour (SSB) has been documented in a wide range of animals, but its evolutionary causes are not well understood. Here, we investigated SSB in the light of Reeve's acceptance threshold theory. When recognition is not error-proof, the acceptance threshold used by males to recognize potential mating partners should be flexibly adjusted to maximize the fitness pay-off between the costs of erroneously accepting males and the benefits of accepting females. By manipulating male burying beetles' search time for females and their reproductive potential, we influenced their perceived costs of making an acceptance or rejection error. As predicted, when the costs of rejecting females increased, males exhibited more permissive discrimination decisions and showed high levels of SSB; when the costs of accepting males increased, males were more restrictive and showed low levels of SSB. Our results support the idea that in animal species, in which the recognition cues of females and males overlap to a certain degree, SSB is a consequence of an adaptive discrimination strategy to avoid the costs of making rejection errors.

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

User comments

The conclusion that SSB for any animal species may somehow be categorized as productive and healthy is a waste of time and resources because it is also clear that no matter how much sex a beetle attempts, his goal for the sex is procreation. Animals cannot be found to have same-sex attraction if they do not even know they are having sex with the same sex. In today's word, there are operations that can be engaged upon a male to make his body resemble a female to such a degree that persons could possibly make a mistake and think the male is a female. So therefore it is not an endorsement of homosexuality that a species of beetles is not smart enough to perfectly distinguish between the male and female of their species. We already know that animals are dumber than humans. We don't need research to confirm this.

E-mail the story

Note

Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose.
The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Your message

Newsletter sign up

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.

Your Privacy

This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, and provide content from third parties.
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy
and Terms of Use.