Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!

The original Crescent of Embrace memorial to Flight 93 faced less than 2° from Mecca. That made it a mihrab, the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built. (Some mihrabs are pointed-arch shaped, but the classic mihrab is crescent shaped.)

The Park Service dismissed concern about the Mecca-oriented crescent on grounds that the construction drawings had not yet been finalized. “Those trees could move fifty feet, or three hundred feet,” said Project Manager Jeff Reinbold in the Spring of 2006, as if this kind of "tweaking" would make any difference (Crescent of Betrayal Ch.8 p.145-6).

The construction drawings have now been released, and yes, they moved the lower tip of the half-mile wide crescent about 300 feet, enough to change the orientation of the crescent by about 4.5°. Instead of pointing less than 2° north of Mecca, the giant Islamic-shaped crescent now points less than 3° south of Mecca.

Here is the original Crescent of Embrace:

"Qibla" is the direction to Mecca, which you can verify using any online Mecca-direction calculator (just type in Somerset PA). A person standing between the tips of the giant crescent and facing into the center of the crescent (red arrow) would be facing 1.8° north of Mecca, ± 0.1°.

Here is one of the new construction drawings:

Instead of facing a titch north of Mecca, the giant crescent now faces a titch south of Mecca (2.7° south ± 0.1°).

As with the original Crescent design, the upper crescent tip is the end of the 50’ tall Entry Portal Wall and the lower crescent tip is the last of the 50’ tall Maple trees on the bottom. The landscape overlays make the details hard to see in the thumbnail image above, but at full resolution they are fully legible. (Copy of source PDF, without the superimposed orientations lines here. Large file warning. Graphic is on p. 30 of 233.)

The Park Service was SUPPOSED to remove the Islamic symbol shapes

When architect Paul Murdoch’s winning Crescent of Embrace design was announced in September 2005, it appeared to show a bare naked Islamic crescent and star-flag planted atop the crash site:

Burned by the resulting firestorm of protest, the Park Service to agreed to get rid of the Islamic symbol shapes, but they never did. They added an extra arc of trees, and they call it a broken circle now, but the unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent.

This is explained on the Park Service's own website, where the extra arc of trees is explicitly described as a broken off part of the circle:

In summary, the memorial is shaped in a circular fashion, and the circle is symbolically "broken" or missing trees in two places, depicting the flight path of the plane, and the crash site.

Those two breaks are the two ends of the extra arc of trees:

The extra arc of trees extends from blue circle to blue circle, marking the two “breaks” in the circle referred to in the Park Service’s official explanation of the broken-circle design. One is where the flight path breaks the circle (left), the other is near the crash site (center).

What is symbolically left standing (the unbroken part of the circle) is just this:

Remove the symbolically broken off parts, and you get the original Crescent of Embrace design.

The only change is that the crescent has now been rotated clockwise a few degrees. In the construction plans it faces slightly south of Mecca instead of slightly north of Mecca. For a parallel, imagine airline security discovering a terror bomber, then playing with the fit his suicide vest before escorting him to his plane.

They said they were going to remove the giant crescent. They claim they HAVE removed it, but they haven't. Symbolically, the design remains completely unchanged. The terrorists are still depicted as smashing our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, still pointing to Mecca.

The giant crescent is actually a mihrab

Here is the mihrab at the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain. Face into the crescent to face Mecca, just like the crescent memorial to Flight 93:

Confronted with evidence that the Crescent of Embrace is actually designed to be the world's largest mosque, the Park Service sought advice from a pair of Muslim scholars. Both acknowledged the almost exact Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent and both offered overtly dishonest excuses for it. One said not to worry about the likeness to an Islamic mihrab because no one has ever seen a mihrab this BIG before:

...most mihrabs are small, rarely larger than the figure of a man, although some of the more ornamental ones can be larger, but nothing as large at the crescent found in the site design. It is unlikely that most Muslims would walk into the area of the circle/crescent and see a mihrab because it is well beyond their limit of experience.

Right. That's why everybody scratches their head at Mt. Rushmore. No one has ever seen Abraham Lincoln so BIG before. They just can't figure it out.

To be fooled by this excuse, you have to really really want to be fooled. The other Muslim scholar said not to worry, the crescent cannot be seen as mihrab unless it points exactly at the Kaaba:

Mihrab orientation is either correct or not. It cannot be off by some degrees.

In fact, a mihrab does NOT have to point exactly at Mecca, for the simple reason that, throughout most of Islamic history, Muslims in far-flung parts of the world had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. As a result, it was established as a matter of religious principle that what matters is intent to face Mecca. This was recently affirmed by Saudi religious authorities, after Meccans realized that even most of their local mosques do not face directly towards the Kaaba. “It does not affect the prayers” assured the Islamic Affairs Ministry.

Faced with evidence of an Islamic plot, why would the Park Service send this evidence exclusively to Muslims for appraisal? Have they forgotten who attacked us on 9/11?

The Service has long since been apprised of the patent dishonesties retailed by its two Muslim advisors but they don't care. They wanted to be lied to, they knew where to go to be lied to, and they got what they wanted.

Michelle Malkin and Ed Morrissey

So where are the patriotic stalwarts like Michelle Malkin whose objections were instrumental in getting the Park Service to agree to remove the Islamic symbol shapes in the first place? If they knew in 2005 that the symbolic outcome of 9/11 should not be a giant Islamic shaped crescent why are they silent about this exact same symbolism today, after THEY were promised that this perversion would be removed?

Ed Morrissey urged his readers "to tell the National Parks Service and the Secretary of the Interior to rethink their plans," promising for his own part that "as long as that crescent remains in the design, I’m not donating a red cent to the memorial." Well Ed, the crescent does remain in the design, so please rejoin the fight.

The desertion of Malkin et. al. makes a difficult gap to fill, but we had better fill it, or the Flight 93 crash-site will soon be home to the world’s largest mosque.

Much Thanks to Eeyore at Vlad Tepesfor this interview,, candid conversations from people who are realising their VERY WAY OF LIFE,, is being threatened by primitive, savage people and their ANTI-LIFE, ANTI-FREEDOM, belief system,

Here's a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformationtactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination and the appeasers and apologists that support them because the Islamists are correct in believing the following:

BOILINGTHE INFIDEL FROG

Islamizationoccurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for theirso-called 'religious rights.'

As long asthe Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will beregarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone.

At 2% and3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffectedgroups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

From 5% onthey exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of thepopulation. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal and workto get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, theIslamic Law.

WhenMuslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a meansof complaint about their conditions. Any non-Muslim action that offends Islamwill result in uprisings and threats.

From 60%you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions,sporadic ethnic cleansing, use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the taxplaced on infidels.

After 80%expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide.

100% willusher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' - the Islamic House of Peace - there'ssupposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim.

Get a FREE TRIAL COPY of the The Gathering Storm eBook which includes the Forward by Walid Shoebat, Introduction, and first 50 pages of The Gathering Storm eBook.

See details below

And remember to listen to the nearly famous Gathering Storm Radio Show. Listen to us live every Friday at 12 Noon PST on BlogTalk Radio. Call in at1-646-915-9870 to comment, reply or just air your spleen!

UPCOMING SHOWS

November 6: Jeff Epstein

November 13 Bill Warner

November 20 Allan Goldstein

As that great leader and Statesman Winston Churchill said,"It's not the government that makes war in a democracy, but the people - andthe people are asleep in the free democracies today, lulled into inaction by a'softening up' process of our enemy."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~The Good German and the Good Muslim

"All that is necessary forthe triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

(Edmund Burke)

I've been thinking about that quote from Edmund and thoughtabout the phrase "The Good German."

Wikipedia defines "TheGood German" as those Germans who claimed not to have supported the Naziregime, yet made no claim to have opposed it in any significant way.

It is a saying among our troops that there are no real Nazis in Germany, only "good Germans." Every crime Germany committed against humanity seems to have been done by someone else.

The term has come tobe used to refer more generically to people in any country who observereprehensible things taking place - whether done by a government or by anotherpowerful institution - but remain silent, neither raising objections nor takingsteps to change the course of events.

Sound a lot like the moderate Muslims - or the 'Good Muslims' - of today.

Excuses are made that the Islamists do not speak for Muslimsand that the radicals represent a small minority of the Muslim population. Yet,we see little organized efforts of'Good Muslims' in standing up to this fringe element in their midst that hassupposedly hijacked their religion.

The most visible and organized efforts we see from Muslimswho have the ear of politicians, educational institutions and the media arethose of Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Islamic Society of NorthAmerica (ISNA), and the Muslim Student Association (MSA) - the first two were labeled "unindicted co-conspirator" in the Holy Land Foundation case. Thesesupposed 'moderate' Muslim organizations have been proven to have roots inradical Islam and seek to turn America into an Islamic state - in their own words.

Though there are some anti-Islamist Muslim organizationslike American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AFID)whotry to combat the strategies of CAIR, MSA, and ISNA, their voice and effectis small. The very same politicians, educational institutions, and media thatgive credence to CAIR, MSA and ISNA by submitting to their demands or accepttheir propaganda as fact, pretty much ignore these anti-Islamist organizationsand individuals.

Muslims in the West are playing with fire. By standing byand letting the Islamists set the agenda for their faith, they risk being sweptup in the unbridled and unmitigated retaliation of all 'Good Muslims' when theIslamists believe we have been weakened enough in both thought and deed todefend our rights, our nation, our family and our selves.

And this, like all enemies of democracy before them, is afatal mistake. No politician. No University President. No civil rightsspokesperson. No leftist columnist or liberal talk show host will be able toprevent the retribution on 'Good Muslims' wherever they are found when hundredsof thousands of Americans are killed or hundredsof threatened suicide bombings like those in Europe take place here in the US.

It's time for all 'Good Muslims' to make their voice heardin no uncertain terms through at leastone national organization that commands the respect of politicians,institutions, organizations and the media.

But that will not happen until such an organization findsthe financial where-with-all on the level of the Islamist funded organizationslike CAIR, ASN and INSA and wahhabist mosques. Money, lots of money, must be acquired by this anti-Islamistorganization from the 'Good Muslims'.

And here's how.

Muslims have an obligation to give a certain amount of theirincome to charity. This is called Zakat. If the 'Good Muslims'don't want the Islamists to speak for them, then take part of that Zakat andcreate and fund a moderate Muslim organization that supports the anti-Islamistview of the supposed Muslim majority. That kind of money from the millions ofMuslims in this country and millions more in the West can mount a strongopposition to the propaganda of the current Muslim mouthpieces.

If the 'Good Muslims' want to dodge the bullet ofretribution that the Good Germans were unable to, then there's an old infidelsaying that they should take to heart.

... and Sikh girls being beaten up and terrorized by the Muslimmen they were dating until they converted. The Hindu Forum of Britain, thestory says, claimed hundreds of Sikh and Hindu girls were victims of suchvicious intimidation. ...

CAIR, for its part, dismisses the allegations of government infiltration. "If it wasn't soinsidious, it would be laughable," CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper toldFOXNews.com. "What are their charges? CAIR seeks political participation of ...

After security forces clashed on Sunday with Muslim rioters on the TempleMount and elsewhere in east Jerusalem, police blamed Hamas and the Islamic Movementfor once again inciting Israel'sArab population to violence in the capital. ... Meanwhile, Hamas condemned Israel for "infiltrating the Aksa Mosque" and"defiling" it. The group also called on Palestinians to rise upagainst Israel, for Arabs and Muslims worldwide to punish Israel."The real battle begins again," ...

Frontpagemagazine interviews David Gaubatz the co-author of Muslim Mafia. Here's a little teaser, read it all. Naturally and fully expected, CAIR is on the defensive. Instead ofaddressing the numerous factual pieces of intelligence ... CAIR has engaged in its typical disinformation efforts to change the subject and attempt todiscredit the messengers. The American people need to hear the facts aboutthis. That's why today we are forwarding you an op-ed written by Rep. ...

Then, came more disinformation.Viewers were treated to a feature on Dr. Lamees Hamdan, a Dubaian Muslim medical doctor and the usual Gulf Stateliar. And Oprah helped with the lies. (Watch the video.) Dr. Hamdan wascarefully picked by ...

In Europe, both are weakened players, caught between a secular majority and anexpanding Muslim population. InAfrica, increasingly the real heart of the Anglican Communion, both are facingan entrenched Islamic presence across a fault line ... By contrast, the Church of England's leadership has opted for conciliation (some would say appeasement),with the Archbishop of Canterbury going so far as to speculate about theinevitability of some kind of sharia law in Britain. ...

That is how we were trained to accept our destiny under Sharia which turned usinto robots ruled by fear, intimidation and warped logic. ...

The Winston Churchill Golden Balls Award

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Golden Balls Award goes each week to the most flagrant Appeaser or Apologist or those that outright lie that has done most to undermine our defense against Islamists. This weeks Golden Balls Award goes to:

Dutch politician and moviemaker Geert Wilders raised a storm of disapproval and angry reactions with hismovie Fitna. At a recent appearance at Temple Universityhe was jeered offstage.

The movie Fitna, which at itsmost basic is an anti-Islamic film, was shown before Dutch politician GeertWilders took the stage to give an address to students at TempleUniversity near Philladelphia Pennsylvania.

After the movie was shown,and the address was given, Wilders offered a question and answer period but wasjeered rudely enough that he was taken away quickly by his security team whenthe mood of portions of the crowd turned ugly.

Isn't wonderful how students go to collegeto open their minds but once there close them like a trap.

Congratulations to the Temple University Students! You can check in and claim your award at Camp Delta, Guantanamo Bay.

The Obama Administration is finally ready to begin the BigPush. No, not the one to stop the Taliban... but to pass a gargantuanhealth care nationalization plan that the majority of the American peopleare opposed to and that no one besides China can actually payfor.

While Hillary Clinton is off doing "valuable work" by holdingmeetings with assorted Pakistanis, Joe Biden is trying not to pass outduring interviews, Pelosi and Reid are trying to shove ObamaCare down theAmerican throat like a bad case of strep. On the bright side, if ObamaCarecovers as many people as Obama's Stimulus plan did, I imagine it willcover about two dozen people somewhere in Vermont.

Back inAmericaland though, more health care bills just means another civil waramong the Democrats. Naturally the first target was Senator Joe Liebermanwho was supposed to have been made an example of for actually trying to bea moderate and resisting the party radicals. Lieberman instead survivedand even thrived.

Naturally the fun is just getting started. Adsare already being run targeting Lieberman... by both sides, with theconservative 60 Plus coalition warning of cuts in medicare and thenutroots damning Lieberman as what else but a shill for the insurancecompanies.

Of course using that same logic, Obama was a shill forWall Street... but the double standards just keep on coming. But it's alot of work nowadays, because Democrats have to begin selling Americans onthe idea that the economy has recovered and the recession is over...despite all those lost jobs and the fact that nothing at all has recoveredoutside of Wall Street, where taxpayer money was fueled into the same darkmaw that caused the problems in the first place.

Then there'shealth care reform, which Democrats have figured will be hard to sell,unless you can convince the American people that the economy is now goodand the US government is rolling in extra dough. And if they can't do thatby the 2010 elections, the veto proof majority is likely to be gone, andthe Dems will be left with the kind of congress the GOP had post 2006,just enough power to take the blame, not enough to accomplishanything.

And MSNBC, the default network of thefar left is running into trouble too, particularly with its newest, mosthyped and most radical member.Rachel Maddow.

Most cable news ratings are going to show declines fromtheir election year heyday last fall, but for MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show(which debuted in September, 2008) those year over year declines have madeOctober, 2009 its lowest rated month ever in both average viewers and thecable news targeted adults 25-54 demo, down 54% and 65% respectively fromOctober, 2008.

Which suggests that MSNBC may be going the way ofAir America, at least in the case of Maddow, an Air America alum, who hasserved as a forum for the most radical of the nutroots. While MSNBC iscrowingthat it beat CNN, this is more of a reflection of how badly off CNNis, than any kind of win for MSNBC.

It's not hard to see why Obamais running scared. Cable News is going the way of Talk Radio. And itsbiggest success, Glen Beck, comes out of the radio market. But it's alsonot hard to see the rapid end of the CNN model, of network news ingeneral, because what sells best is open propaganda, not between the linesbias. MSNBC's ratings are miserable, but they're still less miserable thanCNN, whose only real hope for ratings is the burgeoning AndersonCooper gayscandal.

This is an oddand patronising fear, though true at one level. Fox is certainlyinfluencing CNN and MSNBC, but in a liberal, not conservative,direction. That is, to compete with Fox's ratings-rich combination ofnews and punditry, those networks have had to scramble to find leftwingcounterparts to Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly.

Thishas been a boon for leftwing gabbers. MSNBC's Chris Matthews, KeithOlbermann, Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow, all of whom dedicate themselvesto railing against Republicans nightly, owe their careers in a way toFox's success in carving out a large place for punditry in the cablemedia landscape. If anything, MSNBC is even more opinionated in aliberal direction than Fox is in a conservative one. Even the newsanchors on MSNBC don't bother to conceal their anti-conservativehostilities anymore. David Shuster and Tamron Hall scoffed openly atRush Limbaugh's NFL ownership bid.

CNN's Jack Cafferty, a grumpyliberal version of Bill O'Reilly, also owes his career to Fox, as doesRick Sanchez. CNN, which once prided itself on high-brow newspresentation, feels it has to get into the opinion game too.

And when the bias is open, it becomes harder to claim thattalk of liberal media is just a "right wing fantasy". Unintentionally FOXhas helped make the liberal media come out of the closet.

On the one hand this kind of ugliness is nowthe default mode. On the other hand, there are no more rocks to hidebehind. It was possible to argue that Dan Rather was just doing his joband not taking sides, but no one can even begin to make that same argumentabout Cafferty or Olbermann. And an open bare knuckle fight may bepreferable to a thousand poisoned knives in the dark.

And that'swhat really bothers the Obama White House.

Meanwhile inworldchanging news, Hillary Clinton went to Pakistan where she had thesolution to all of Pakistan's problems. Embrace Obama's Tax-Fu. (ViaGateway Pundit)

“The percentage of taxes on GDP (in Pakistan) is amongthe lowest in the world… We (the United States) tax everything thatmoves and doesn’t move, and that’s not what we see in Pakistan,” shesaid.

First of all you have to have a functioning country to beable to tax everything that moves. Second of all in a country whereterrorists can make money off the black market, do you really want to pushaggressive taxation that will expand the black market?

And thenthere was Hillary Clinton's hard core grasp of the majorissues;

LAHORE: The leadership of Al Qaeda is in Pakistan, USSecretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Thursday.

“I find ithard to believe that nobody in your government knows where they are andcouldn’t get them if they really wanted to,” she added. “Maybe that’sthe case; maybe they’re not gettable. I don’t know... As far as we know,they are in Pakistan,” Clinton told senior Pakistani newspaper editorsin Lahore,

The New York Times (10/29, B6) reports, “A consortium ofChinese and American companies announced a joint venture on Thursday tobuild a 600-megawatt wind farm in West Texas, using turbines made inChina. Construction of the $1.5 billion wind farm will be financedlargely by Chinese banks, with the help of loan guarantees and cashgrants from the United States government.”

Next I would like to take a little time out to address anarticle from Vdare, a site I do not link to, by Steve Sailer. You canfindthe textof the article here. I'm not in the habit of replying toeverything that comes out of that burst sewage pipe, but since MichelleMalkin thought the article was buzzworthy, I've decided to addressit.

It's easy enough to destroy it point by point, but since thearticle is a barely coherent hodgepodge of claims about Ashkenazi genes,Jewish media power, ancestor worship, Goldman Sachs, Israel... let's skipto the actual conclusion.

Steve Sailer concludes his "article" withthe following claim:

Thus Jewish demonization of immigration reform patriotsappears to have two motivations:

...

And this demonizationis the single most important reason that America’s immigration disasteris still above criticism, long after it has become obvious that it is adisaster, and despite the fact that an overwhelming number of Americansare strongly opposed to it.

*Continue to push for comprehensive immigration reform that: increasessecurity; has an earned pathway to legalization for undocumented workersalready contributing to our economy, provided that they are law-abidingand prepared to embrace the obligations and values of our society;creates a carefully monitored guest or essential worker program to fillthe growing gaps in America's workforce recognizing that, in some cases,permanent immigrants will be needed to fill these gaps; and refrainsfrom unduly burdening employers with worker verification systems thatare underfunded or unworkable.

If you're confused by what any of that means, it means theChamber of Commerce wants to legalize illegal aliens already in the US,increase temporary worker visas and increase the number of permanentimmigrants.

Why does the Chamber of Commerce want that? Becauseit's about the money and about bringing in the cheap labor.

Reallynow, why do you think that prominent Republicans like Bush Sr, Bush Jr andMcCain were such big fans of open borders and bringing in more immigrants.It didn't have a whole lot to do with Steve Sailer's Jewish conspiracy,and a whole lot to do with the fact that the needs of big business are notthose that necessarily benefit America itself.

But unpleasant factslike that are not nearly as sexy as blaming the whole thing on theJews.

Of course Steve Sailer might reply that the Jews run theChamber of Commerce. But do Jews run the Catholic Church?

WhileSailer appears to blame Jewish romanticism of immigration, suchromanticism is hardly limited to Jewish immigrants, versus say Catholic,Irish, Italian and Latino immigrants in the late 19th and 20thcenturies.

In fact the United States Conference of Catholic Bishopshas been a major force behind the push for legalizing illegal immigrants,who happen to be heavily Catholic.

That kind of percentages are far more likely to promoteunrestricted immigration, rather than the all-powerful Jews of Sailer'smythology.

I don't blame the Catholic Church for promoting theimmigration of more Catholics to America. I just wish they would limitthat support to legal immigration only. Nevertheless the Church has theright to promote what it likes, as does every other group in America. It'spossible to take issue with what they promote, but it is perfectlypossible to criticize an organization's policies, without trafficking inconspiracy theories about entire ethnic groups or trying to level all theblame for an international problem on one particular group.

Thefact of the matter is that immigrant groups who came to America within thelast 125 years are going to be far more likely to see immigrationpositively, than those who have not. Additionally big business has alwaysneeded immigration as a source of cheap labor. Steve Sailer's article,"Norman Podhoretz’s Why Are Jews Liberal? Not Good Enough", detours fromthose basic facts to promote his agenda, which is to begin by claimingthat the Jews have taken over the GOP and to conclude by essentiallyarguing that the Jews have taken over America, since asLawerence Austerpoints out

To say that the Jews are the primary force that issuppressing the supposed immigration restrictionist sentiment of theoverwhelming majority of Americans, to suggest that but for the Jews thenon-Jewish majority would have ended America's mass Third-Worldimmigration policy by now

... which as has been demonstrated is blatantlyfalse.

The article's early mention of Joe Sobran props up Sailer'sonly real thesis that runs through the piece, that Jews have leveragedtheir power to make themselves above criticism. One wonders which universeSailer is living in, because in my universe the average newspaper takesthe side of terrorists over Israel, emphasizes the Jewishness of criminalsand is willing to print outright smears about Judaism.

A lot ofthe American Far Right seems slow to learn the lessons that the EuropeanFar Right is learning... that maybe they have bigger problems to deal withthan the Jews. But it's always easier to take the lazy Protocols of theElders of Zion way out.

Continuing the roundup, Obama's Muslimadvisor doesn't regret anything shesaid on a Hizb U Tahir program, only that she went on it. Which is thesort of thing that we would buy if we believed that she was eitherignorant of Hizb U Tahir, something that itself would make her unqualifiedto advise Obama on Muslim issues. So either Dalia Mogahed is a liar and inbed with Islamists, or incompetent. Either way she should go.

But of course we know that Obama's people have a history of quietly makingcontact with Islamists and terrorists. Even before he crawled into theWhite House.

Readers will note that the Organization of the IslamicConference has a membership of 57 states. When Candidate Obama alarmedsome folks by claiming he had campaigned in 57 states, there was a hueand cry -- not about what he had said and what it might mean, butagainst those who had noticed.

Back in the dusty BtB archives, Ionce wondered aloud about the "other countries" in Obama's statementthat "we can't ... expect that other countries are going to say OK." Iwrote then that

I don't get it. What other countries? Does hemean we take our orders from the OIC?

The White House Friday highlighted a newmulti-million-dollar technology fund for Muslim nations, following apledge made by President Barack Obama in his landmark speech to theIslamic world.

The White House said the US Overseas PrivateInvestment Corporation (OPIC) had issued a call for proposals for thefund, which will provide financing of between 25 and 150 million dollarsfor selected projects and funds.

Now what are the odds that the money will directly orindirectly benefit terrorists? Considering the Zakah money that mostMuslim businesses provide, a sizable portion of which goes to Islamists orterrorists... we might as well just give it to the Talibandirectly.

Meanwhile the way is being paved with a spate of articlesclaiming that there really is no group called the Taliban, that it's abroad coalition, most of whom just want food and water. The same claim wasalso made about Al Queda.

For those with longer memories, the sameclaim was made about the Viet Cong, who we were assured were mostly notCommunists and perfectly jolly fellows who would happily lay down theirarms if we just gave them reason to trust us.

What of the National Liberation Front -- that strangelyanonymous group we call VC or Communists? What must they think of us inAmerica when they realize that we permitted the repression and crueltyof Diem which helped to bring them into being as a resistance group inthe south? ... Surely we must see that the men we supported pressed themto their violence. Surely we must see that our own computerized plans ofdestruction simply dwarf their greatest acts.

How do they judgeus when our officials know that their membership is less thantwenty-five percent Communist and yet insist on giving them the blanketname? What must they be thinking when they know that we are aware oftheir control of major sections of Vietnam and yet we appear ready toallow national elections in which this highly organized politicalparallel government will have no part? They ask how we can speak of freeelections when the Saigon press is censored and controlled by themilitary junta. And they are surely right to wonder what kind of newgovernment we plan to help form without them -- the only party in realtouch with the peasants. They question our political goals and they denythe reality of a peace settlement from which they will be excluded.

Well luckily Martin Luther King was absolutely right. Westruck a peace settlement with the Viet Cong who were not all Communistand today Vietnam is a thriving utopia where its people have freeelections and all are welcome to... oh wait. We struck a deal, the dealwas worthless... and the nice folks that Benedict Arnold Jr told us arenot at all Communists... went and created themselves a Communistdictatorship with no free elections.

Who knew? And who wants to betthat by the time Obama's people are done, they'll find some nice Talibanto negotiate with, force Karzai to cut a deal, and then take thehelicopters from the embassy while beneath us the Taliban return toimplement the glorious gender justice of Sharia law?

But gender justice in Islam is not completely a lost cause. Never fear.

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — A 37-year-old wife from NewBrighton tried to slit her husband’s throat as he slept because he wasnot the devout Muslim she believed she married, and pressured her to eatpork and drink alcohol, authorities allege.

In a rambling,four-page handwritten confession, Rabia Sarwar laid out the “mental andemotional cruelty” that led to her trying to kill her husband, SusanWagner High School teacher Sheikh Naseem, early yesterday morning, a lawenforcement source said.

“I tried my best to cut his throat,” Ms.Sarwar admitted, according to court papers. Except Naseem woke up duringthe attempt, and took the knife from her, authorities said.

The way the law enforcement source describes it, Ms. Sarwar, who isPakistani, told investigators that Naseem, who is half-Pakistani, hadpresented himself as a devout Muslim before the two had wed five monthsago.

But after the marriage, she discovered more about him, shetold investigators — before meeting her, he had only dated non-Muslims,and he considered Salman Rushdie to be one of his favoriteauthors.

Well clearly he had to die.

But the good news isthat Rabia Sarwar represents a way forward for Muslim women to gain equalrights to kill men who aren't Muslim enough.

For centuries Muslimmen have been able to kill Muslim women who they felt weren't Muslimenough. Now in a stirring tribute to Sharia's gender justice, perhapsMuslim women will enjoy the same rights to slit throats, throw acid andbehead.

Between female suicide bombers and female honor killers,you can't deny the fact that Islam is doing its best to give Muslim womenan equal role in carrying out the true teachings of Islam.

The 2009 report by the World Economic Forum has listedpredominantly Islamic nations in the bottom of their annual GlobalGender Gap (GGG) Index. This included such major nations as Pakistan(ranked 132 out of 134), Saudi Arabia (ranked 130 out of 134), Iran(ranked 128 out of 134), Egypt (ranked 126 out of 134), and Turkey(ranked 129 out 134). Yemen, which is 99 percent Islamic, was the bottomranked nation as 134 on the Global Gender Gap Index. The only nation notpredominantly Islamic in the bottom of the Global Gender Gap index wasBenin.

In addition, the 2009 World Economic Forum Global GenderGap Index report does not include rankings on a number of significantand predominantly Islamic nations where women are oppressed. Somalia(population of nearly 10 million) was not included in the index. Endlessnumbers of reports of the stonings and Islamic supremacist abuses ofwomen have been reported in Somalia in the past year, including thestoning to death of a 13 year old girl based on “Sharia law” in October2008. Sudan (population of nearly 41 million) was also not included inthe World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Index. Among other nations,Afghanistan (29 million) and Iraq (29 million) are also not included inthis Global Gender Gap Index. With the index not reporting on these 109million, the desperate fate of an estimated 50 plus million women arenot included in this Global Gender Gap index report.

The much-hyped, soon-to-open Breslin restaurant,situated in the 12-story Ace Hotel on Broadway and 29th, is givingmembers of the Masjid Ar-Rahman mosque across the street some agita.“Five times a day, there’s a hundred cabs on the street—the good news isyou can always get a cab,” co-owner Ken Friedman told the Transom theother evening. He said some mosque visitors “object to seeing peopledrink alcohol.”

After the recent FergusStock, a festival duringwhich famed British chef Fergus Henderson cooked whole pigs for a raptcrowd of New York chefs and foodies, Mr. Friedman said the mosque’sleaders called a meeting with the hotel. “They said, ‘Can you move thebar?’” he said. “And I laughed. And the guy said, ‘Oh, you think that’sfunny?’ And I said, ‘Yeah, that is funny, that is really funny, becausewe’re not going to move the bar just because you discovered we’reserving booze.’ Can you name one restaurant in New York that doesn’tserve booze?”

Mr. Friedman and his partner, Spotted Pig chefApril Bloomfield, did agree to nix plans for a dive bar in a townhousenext door, but as for the restaurant, “I said, ‘This is the UnitedStates of America and we’ll do whatever the fuck we want.’” He said themosque had suggested it couldn’t control the behavior of “a few badeggs”; i.e., “we could get a brick through our window.” Mr. Friedmansaid he made the police aware of this threat.

http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law

We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org

The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.

The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.