Better Broadband Better Lives

WASHINGTON, April 6, 2009 – Among the commenters weighing in on the Commerce Department’s broadband technologies grants on Thursday, April 2, and Friday, April 3, several echoed the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners’ proposal for a state role in allocating funds.

And in new filings, several businesses offering potentially innovative proposals urged a variety of different ways and platforms upon which the federal government to leverage stimulus funds.

Zhone Technologies said it wanted the program to focus on job creation, and requests that the goals for the program can only be met by “careful and appropriate consideration of the actual American labor content.” Zhone noted that infrastructure is labor and equipment intensive, with as much as 60% of project costs going to equipment elements. With “American content” of equipment varying widely, a close look must be taken in order to meet the overarching goals of the stimulus plan.

NTIA must continue to oversee the DTV transition and RUS has existing programs in place that they must manage. With these existing commitments in place, the states must play a key role in the stimulus, the state said, as did NARUC. Ohio requested that the states be able to use their first-hand experience within their borders to rank the project applications, with criteria specified by RUS and NTIA as guidance.

PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association, and the DAS Forum, a membership section of PCIA, said they have “a significant interest in the framework of broadband stimulus grant programs” since wireless broadband service is currently being provided by four or five carriers, with more on the way. Each carrier requires “approximately 35,000 wireless facilities to deploy a nationwide broadband service.”

Broadband grants would “transform…unsustainable business models into positive business cases for wireless infrastructure,” allowing a higher level of roll-out than previously possible. PCIA defines “underserved” as an area “in which there is only one provider of ubiquitous wireless broadband service,” and “unserved” as any area where “no wireless broadband service is available.” http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/comment.cfm?e=EC5C0143-711D-4AFE-A49E-E9942A1D635C

Several individual commenters stated that “dark fiber” should be targeted first.

AlphaStar requested that the Federal Communications Commission be actively involved in the proceedings, specifically with the FCC’s expertise with small cap and minority owned businesses. AlphaStar proposed a hybrid model involving terrestrial broadband and satellite backhaul. Broadband funds would allow AlphaStar, who first rolled out this network in 2000, to roll out this network in unserved and underserved areas as sought by the fiscal stimulus measure. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/broadbandgrants/comment.cfm?e=0D011230-F1B8-43BB-8EFE-42F3B76957A4

Broadband Breakfast Club

Don’t miss the opportunity to register for the April 14, 2009, Broadband Breakfast Club at the Old Ebbitt Grill. The theme of the April meeting will be, “Spending the Stimulus: Can States’ Front-line Experiences Expedite Broadband Deployment?” Register at http://broadbandbreakfast.eventbrite.com.