We use cookies on this website to enhance your browser experience. By continuing to use this site, you are providing us with your consent to our use of cookies on the site. To learn more about cookies and how we use them, please review our privacy policy.

Importantly, notes Epstein Becker & Green attorney James P. Flynn, in Nosal it did so in a case where the former employee was not alleged to have any overseas connection. The author cautions trade secret owners, however, that there were dissents in this case that could prove consequential. One dissent, he says, took the position that the court in this case improperly expanded the purview of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act beyond its “anti-hacking roots.”