> > And WTF do you mean by "supposedly?" You think maybe there> > are three different empty sets?>> No, almost the opposite. In my way of thinking, it is a contradiction> to have a set of nothing. It is simply nothing, not a set of nothing.

Riddle:

Go to the store and buy a big bag of potatoes. Take
the potatoes out of the bag one at a time. When
you take the last potato out, does the bag disappear?

Poof!

> According to wiki, "The empty set is not the same thing as nothing".> Okey dohkie, then what represents nothing in set theory?