Wednesday, June 28, 2017

City Council approves so-called Empty Home Tax without regard to owners of second homes

Today I am ashamed to be a Vancouverite. The Vision members of Council approved the Empty Home Tax bylaw with only a few housekeeping modifications, and continue to consider a second home that is occupied 179 days a year to be deemed 'empty' as far as the tax is concerned. It's nuts.

When I asked the staff person from Planning Department responsible for the report if he was aware of any example of a successful application of a vacant home program in London or elsewhere, he couldn't give me one.

When I asked why the recommended taxing second homes, he replied their consultant said anything less than a 180 day threshold was not workable, noting programs that require you to log days isn't workable. While that is not what I asked, I have now requested a copy of this consultant's report.

At any rate, the matter has been decided and life goes on. But below, for the record, are my speaking notes . A year or two from now, I will be interested to see just how much this program ultimately costs to administer, (the estimate has tripled from an initial $2.5 M to over $7.4) and how much revenue it brings in, and how many units truly come onto the rental market. I hope I'm pleasantly surprised, but somehow I don't think I will be. But the tax has achieved its objective of pandering to those voters who feel the city must do more to address housing affordability, especially those who invaded the council chamber yesterday screaming TAX THE RICH, HOUSE THE POOR!

Empty Home Tax

·My name is Michael Geller & I’m here
speaking on my own behalf, as someone with a longstanding interest in housing
policy. I’m not here as a paid consultant or as someone affected by the
tax

·I agree we are in a housing crisis and need to
take action to increase supply of affordable rental housing

·Like you and everyone in this chamber, I am
disturbed by the number of empty or vacant dwellings in the city and would like
to see them put to use, rather than serve as safety deposit boxes for investors

·So why am I here today? The city has repeatedly
stated the goal of this tax is to bring empty and vacant units onto the rental market.

I am not
here to talk about empty or vacant dwellings. I am here to point out that there
are many occupied HOMES which under this bylaw are ‘deemed empty’ that have become
collateral damage under this tax. It is unfair to start taxing them under this bylaw when they are not empty.

·These are the second homes of BC residents,
Canadians living in other parts of the country, (some of whom once lived here
or have family here) and yes, Americans and Chinese and Germans and so on). They
are owned by BC politicians who regularly come into Vancouver; former residents
who regularly return to see family, or for medical attention.

·Again, These
properties are not empty.Some are occupied throughout year on weekends or
weeks at a time; others are occupied for 4 or 5 months over the summer.

·My point
is that these homes are no more likely to be rented out for 30 days at a time
than the spare bedrooms in your home are likely to be rented out.

·As you know I have been complaining about this
aspect of the tax in the media & social media. Many have criticized me for advocating
for people who own two homes when so many in the city can’t even afford to rent
one, adding anyone who owns a second home can afford to pay the tax.

·However, others have noted that by going after
second home owners, this appears to be little more like an envy or jealousy
tax. They see it as vote pandering to those who want to tax the rich to house
the poor. (I gather than some of them were here to disrupt yesterdays council
meeting).

·Let me repeat. These second homes cannot be rented out
when the owners aren’t here. Your bylaw might force the owners to sell their
condos, but surely that’s not your objective. (I will add for the benefit of Tom Davidoff and
others that when they are sold, the owners will pay Capital Gains Tax on any
appreciation.

·I strongly believe this tax will have a better
chance of success, be more cost effective to administer, and be deemed more
equitable if you amend the wording of the bylaw so that
it clearly distinguishes between truly empty units, and those occupied for many
months each year, but less than 180 days.

·Your staff are clever enough to draft the revisions.

When I questioned
the staff person administering the bylaw why this tax was applying to people owning second
homes, I was told second home owners had choices. When I asked what choices, I was told they could pay the tax or sell
their unit.

·I sincerely hope members of Council do
not think these are reasonable choices to offer someone who has chosen
Vancouver as a place to live, including the Singaporean who according to the
Vancouver Sun recently offered to build an art museum for the city because he
loved our city so much after keeping a home here.

·Finally,
to truly increase the supply of rental housing, I urge you to address the problem of investor-owned
Airbnb’s. These are having a far greater negative impact on available
rental housing stock.

·I also urge
you to approve the backlog of rental
housing projects in the system. When I last checked there are hundreds of
rezoning and development permit applications awaiting approval, many of which
include rental housing

·Improve the city’s zoning to reduce
number of rezonings.

·I also recommend that the city set up a
matchmaking service so that those who have empty suites, and there are hundreds
of them, and even empty bedrooms, can make them available to those seeking
affordable homes.

4 comments:

We understand that BUYING OR SELLING can sometimes be a very stressful situation especially if you do not understand the language. We, here at RD Properties speak English & Spanish and here to assist, not only purchasing or selling your property, but with all legal documentation during the process. Sea Views properties costa del silencio

บาคาร่า Online gambling games allow gamblers to play gambling games with our online casino. Our gambling games are gambling games that anyone interested in playing our gambling games to make money for themselves. Many gamblers who come to play gambling games with our online casino are the same voice that our online casino is open to us.

Our gambling games are gamblers who are interested in playing games because our gambling games are live gambling games. Texas Hold'em, online slots, online poker, blackjack, online gambling, roulette, horse racing, gourds, crabs, fish, dragon and other gambling games. The online casino is open to the player to play gambling games with our online casino.

And for those who are interested in playing gambling games with the online casino, we have to apply to join the fun with our online games anyway. It is that when the player has to play a game with our online casino, we gamblers are attracted to the gambling บาคาร่า มือถือ games that we are open for sure.