AT&T and Sprint Tussle About Roaming Rules

Have you forgot that Sprint accused ATT of the very same thing? Sprint accused ATT on not building out their network to utilize spectrum that they own in certain areas and they even had the balls to say they could show them how! Sprint is showing an even bigger pair, by saying that they will rely on roaming agreements to satisfy coverage in certain areas, instead of spending money to build it out. How hypocritical of Sprint to put that out there and think that ATT was going to just sit back and let that happen, without bringing it to the publics attention. Love them or hate them, ATT has a very valid point and they should make a fuss about it.

NO. Sprint is not trying to create a monopoly/duopoly in not building out its network in Oklahoma. ATT was trying to do that with the merger. But, like Sprint stated, they actually are in the middle of an aggressive network expansion/upgrade so ATT ne...(continues)

ATT and Verizon are NOT suing to make Sprint build out its network. They are suing to challenge the law that says they have to allow roaming agreements with rural carriers. So attacking Sprint makes no sense here. Thanks for playing, sheeple.

Sprint is like the guy that goes to the bar with a bunch of friends. Everybody including sprint orders a drink. Then when they all decide to see a menu for some food, Sprint decides they dont want any food, but proceeds to graze off of everyone elses plates. Get your own food, Sprint.

When Verizon purchased Altell and AT&T purchaesd spectrum in ND, SD, MT. sprint lost coverage there. Today there is hardly any coverage for Sprint customers in the upper Midwest and now in Sprints home state. Sprint this is a huge chunk of the country...(continues)

now att is going after revenge for everyone who stopped them from buying t-maybe. att is worse for the consumers out there then all the republican canidates running for office...and that says something