The only thing I'd say for this, is try to keep your letters the same width, and on the same angle.The L-i, doesn't really match up with the flow in the rest of the letters, and the extension coming off the t looks awkward.

The only thing I'd say for this, is try to keep your letters the same width, and on the same angle.The L-i, doesn't really match up with the flow in the rest of the letters, and the extension coming off the t looks awkward.

The only thing I'd say for this, is try to keep your letters the same width, and on the same angle.The L-i, doesn't really match up with the flow in the rest of the letters, and the extension coming off the t looks awkward.

in the sketch the kerning is off, but in thefinished design it isn't. the extension is a lightningbolt.

I understand that. What I'm saying is the letters don't all fit together cohesively, and it looks weird. I know that the extension is a lightning bolt, the part where it loops off the T on the right side looks un-natural. Maybe post the finished image so I can see what it looks like after rendering?

I understand that. What I'm saying is the letters don't all fit together cohesively, and it looks weird. I know that the extension is a lightning bolt, the part where it loops off the T on the right side looks un-natural. Maybe post the finished image so I can see what it looks like after rendering?

I don't entirely understand what you are trying to say. The type is based off of a font, and they all go cohesive with each other. You are critiquing it from a side image. The way it loops off, that is how baseball/varsity logos look. http://rlv.zcache.com/baseball_script_logo_in_red_card-p137320510504655703envwi_400.jpg

I understand that. What I'm saying is the letters don't all fit together cohesively, and it looks weird. I know that the extension is a lightning bolt, the part where it loops off the T on the right side looks un-natural. Maybe post the finished image so I can see what it looks like after rendering?

I don't entirely understand what you are trying to say. The type is based off of a font, and they all go cohesive with each other. You are critiquing it from a side image. The way it loops off, that is how baseball/varsity logos look. http://rlv.zcache.com/baseball_script_logo_in_red_card-p137320510504655703envwi_400.jpg

What I'm saying is, you're executing it poorly. At least from what I can see in the original sketch, what you've done doesn't flow properly and doesn't feel right. You don't have to try to justify what you've done, I'm just telling you what I'm seeing. (Invalid img) For example. none of your letters are following the same flow, and therefore to me at least if feels completely off. The way that the lightning bolt comes off the bottom of the T isn't balanced with the rest of the word.

the G and H are too far apart, the cross of the T is on an off angle, the L is totally off, the stem of the I G H and T are not aligned at the same angle.

but you can tell from the product pic, that all of that seems to be corrected....the loop connecting the G and H are fixed, the T looks perfect, and the tail lightning bolt flows off the T alot better.

the G and H are too far apart, the cross of the T is on an off angle, the L is totally off, the stem of the I G H and T are not aligned at the same angle.

but you can tell from the product pic, that all of that seems to be corrected....the loop connecting the G and H are fixed, the T looks perfect, and the tail lightning bolt flows off the T alot better.

Looks Good.

Word, I wasn't smashing on the final design because i haven't seen it flat out. It most def looks better though. I was just giving my 2 cents on the preliminary sketch.

dude, haha you think we didn't think of that? that is why the sketch is a sketch.. No sketch is perfect, it took about a month to finalize and render the design. We made it look great and fixed up all the revisions.

dude, haha you think we didn't think of that? that is why the sketch is a sketch.. No sketch is perfect, it took about a month to finalize and render the design. We made it look great and fixed up all the revisions.

the G and H are too far apart, the cross of the T is on an off angle, the L is totally off, the stem of the I G H and T are not aligned at the same angle.

agreed, and thanks man.

but you can tell from the product pic, that all of that seems to be corrected....the loop connecting the G and H are fixed, the T looks perfect, and the tail lightning bolt flows off the T alot better.

dude, haha you think we didn't think of that? that is why the sketch is a sketch.. No sketch is perfect, it took about a month to finalize and render the design. We made it look great and fixed up all the revisions.

the G and H are too far apart, the cross of the T is on an off angle, the L is totally off, the stem of the I G H and T are not aligned at the same angle.

agreed, and thanks man.

but you can tell from the product pic, that all of that seems to be corrected....the loop connecting the G and H are fixed, the T looks perfect, and the tail lightning bolt flows off the T alot better.

Looks Good.

Fair enough. For me at least, I can definetly see that some corrections were made in the final design, but because of the angle/ material stretch I can't actually see what it looks like.

&quot;dude, haha you think we didn't think of that?&quot; No, I didn't assume that you'd fixed all of that, because I have no idea who you are, and what type of work you do. Don't quickly jump on the offensive as soon as someone tries to give you some criticism.