Pages

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

How Vaccinated Kids Infect The Non-Vaccinated

With
the thousands of mainstream media articles blaming the non-vaccinated
for disease outbreaks, this article will provide a necessary
counterbalance by showing the vaccinated can (and do) infect the
non-vaccinated...

The
study also indicated that two of the five strains of rotavirus within
the Rotateq reassorted to produce a more harmful virus either within the
vaccinated infant or within the subsequently infected unvaccinated
sibling:

"Results of our investigation suggest that
reassortment between vaccine component strains of genotypes P7[5]G1 and
P1A[8]G6 occurred during replication either in the vaccinated infant or
in the older sibling, raising the possibility that this reassortment may
have increased the virulence of the vaccine-derived virus."

This
phenomenon of Rotateq vaccine strain ​reassortment and subsequent
gastoenteritis infection in vaccine recipients was also observed in a
2012 study in 61 infants.[2]
Additionally, A Nicaraguan study published in 2012 found "the
widespread use of the RotaTeq vaccine has led to the introduction of
vaccine genes into circulating human RVs.," revealing that the
widespread introduction of the vaccine strain has altered the genetic
makeup of wild-type rotavirus that now infects exposed populations.[3]

It has been estimated that between 80-100% of infants shed rotavirus at some point during 25-28 days after vaccination.[4][5]
This reveals that the vaccinated, contrary to widespread assumptions
about the the risks represented by the non-vaccinated, pose a clear risk
of infecting the non-vaccinated, and may be producing the
ideal virological conditions for the recombination of diverse rotavirus
strains into vaccine-resistant 'super viruses.'

"In 2010, a case report was published in Pediatrics
describing a 30-month old healthy boy who had never received rotavirus
vaccine and was infected with vaccine strain rotavirus. 237 He ended up
in the emergency room with severe gastroenteritis 10 days after his
healthy two-month old brother was given a dose of Merck's RotaTeq
vaccine. A stool sample was taken in the emergency room and came back
positive for RotaTeq vaccine derived strains after RT-PCR testing."

The
authors of the case report noted that "transmission of RotaTeq strains
to unvaccinated contacts was not evaluated in the pivotal
[pre-licensure] clinical trials." They added that both RotaTeq and
Rotarix [GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals] vaccines have "the potential for
vaccine-virus transmission to contacts."

Historically
incapable of self-recusal, despite his glaring conflicts of interest,
Offit regularly positions himself as an expert on vaccines, even though
he personally gains from presenting his product (and the CDC's vaccine
schedule as a whole) as safe and effective. Case in point, in one
notorious interview in Parenting magazine he claimed a child can receive
10,000 vaccines simultaneously without harm (corrected from 100,000 which he suggested in a previous interview).

The Rotavirus Vaccine Was Dirty from the Start

The
first rotavirus vaccine – Rotashield – comprised of four reassorted
rhesus-human rotaviruses was approved in 1999, only to be withdrawn from
the market by the FDA nine months later
when it was found to increase the risk for a deadly form of bowel
obstruction known as intussusception in a small subset of highly
vulnerable children.[6]

Offit's
Rotateq, which consists of 5 reassorted human-bovine retroviruses (yes,
that means GMO), was believed to be a safer alternative when it was
approved by the FDA in 2006, but newly published research reveals his vaccine suffers from the same exact deadly problems.

Published this month in Vaccine and titled, "Intussusception
risk after RotaTeq vaccination: Evaluation from worldwide spontaneous
reporting data using a self-controlled case series approach",
the study evaluated worldwide reports to the manufacturer of Rotateq up
to May 2014, adjusting for the phenomenon of under-reporting. The
study found that the relative risk of intussception associated with the
administration of Rotateq vaccine increases "3-7 days following
vaccination, mainly after the first dose and marginally after the second
and third doses." The increase in relative risk reached 3.45
fold in the period 3-to-7 days after the first dose, relative to the
15-30-day period control period.
Another study linking Rotateq to intussusception was published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine finding approximately 1.5 (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) excess cases of intussusception per 100,000 recipients of the first dose.[7]

Live Vaccines: A Pandora's Box of Adventitious Viruses

Death
or debilitation by bowel obstruction rapidly following Rotateq
vaccination is an acute adverse effect that is unlikely to be overlooked
or ignored. This is why the Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System
(VAERS): a passive, vaccine post-marketing surveillance system, has
found it to be a significant side effect. VAERS, however, is believed
to capture as little as less than 1% of the actual damage being done by
vaccines, indicating that the extent of harm of the Rotateq is several
orders of magnitude than presently indicated by this report.

Exposure
to Rotateq therefore suffers – like many live vaccines – from a darker
side, as far as adverse effects go, which may take months, years, or
decades to manifest as part of the multifactorial smog cloud of modern
day toxicities and exposures that eventually make their way into the
bottleneck of a classical diagnosis.

Rotateq, for instance, has been identified to be contaminated with a
number of adventitious viruses; that is to say, viruses that
contaminated the live cells and/or biological components involved in the
original vaccine manufacturing process. These surreptitious agents,
unknown to the manufacturers and regulatory agencies that approved them,
infected the vaccines the children given them. These viruses include:

Porcine Circovirus 1 (PCV-1): In 2010 the FDA suspended
the Rotarix vaccine due to the discovery that it was contaminated with
PCV-1 virus, a pig virus, the implications of which as far as human
exposure are still unknown. Considered less a risk than PCV-2, known to
cause a debilitating wasting disease in piglets, the FDA determined,
after review, that PCV-1 does not represent a risk to the millions of
children exposed to it.

Porcine Circovirus 2 (PCV-2): A 2014 study conducted by CDC researchers and published in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutcs
titled, "Detection of PCV-2 DNA in stool samples from infants
vaccinated with RotaTeq®," found for the first time that PCV-2 is shed
in the stool of those vaccinated with Rotateq. They found "A total of
235 (28.5%) samples from 59 vaccine recipients were positive
for PCV-2 DNA by one or more assays used in this study." Additionally,
"Twenty-two of the 102 vaccine recipients (21.6%) shed RotaTeq® vaccine
strain and 10 of these vaccinees (9.8%) were shedding both PCV DNA and
rotavirus vaccine RNA." In pigs, PCV-2 has been linked to serious
health problems including, "PCV2-associated pneumonia, PCV2-associated
enteritis, PCV2-associated reproductive failure, and Porcine Dermatitis
and Nephropathy Syndrome (PDNS)." [source]. In 2010,
The FDA ruled, against the precautionary principle, that neither "PCV1
or PCV2 are known to infect or cause illness in humans, however PCV2 may
cause illness in pigs."

Baboon endogenous strain 7 retrovirus DNA: a 2014 study published in Advances in Virology titled, "Screening of Viral Pathogens from Pediatric Ileal Tissue Samples after Vaccination," found evidence of contamination with a baboon retrovirus.

Class D Simian Retovirus: a 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed
that the Rotateq vaccine contains simian retrovirus DNA (with a 96%
match of certainty), which Judy Mikovits, PhD, confirms may contribute
to adverse health effects, regardless of whether it is a
self-replicating virus or not.

Because live
vaccines are manufactured through co-culturing cells and biological
fluids from various different species, there is plenty of opportunity
for viruses to adapt to, and recombine to produce infectious agents
capable of far greater virulence. Rotateq is just one of many vaccines
in the CDC's immunization schedule that contain live viruses capable of
infecting those given it, including retroviruses, which have been called
a modern-day Plague owing to the fact that they are capable of
infecting the host as non-HIV acquire immunodeficiency viruses. For more
information read Dr. Judy Mikovits and Kent Heckenlively's new book Plagueor listen to my interview of Dr. Mikovits on Fearless Parent Radio.

Clearly,
given the evidence revealing the potential unintended, adverse effects
of the Rotateq vaccine, especially the potential for it to infect those
exposed to it with adventitious viruses, the implementation of the
precautionary principle requires the immediate suspension of its use
until proper toxicological reevaluations can be made. Anyone who
questions the safety of the present CDC immunization schedule should be
able to point to the Rotateq as a perfect example of why the schedule is
not at all evidence based but rather founded in a mythological belief
in the safety and effectiveness of products that have never been proven
sound.

Intellectual Center Reviews

Intellectual Center provides Independent News in blog format to assist other activists, teachers, and elders with alternative news, information on social issues, and research material.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Intellectual Center (Website) may post copyrighted material not specifically authorized in accordance with Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law allowing purposes associating learning processes. Please be advised if you intend to use such copyrighted material for personal reasons beyond "fair use," considerations, please obtain permission from the copyright owner. Learning processes encompass a vast array of issues of concern and would not be restrictive, it would offer critique and extended scholarly research.

Website may display third party authors/advertising which may not represent the views or opinions of Website or contributors. Advertisements are not endorsed as such and are intended as alternative ways to support the work at Website.