2 The In-House Lawyer November 2010 UAE Habib Al Mulla & Co IN EARLY JANUARY 2010, THE MEDIA WAS full of headlines about a landmark verdict and Dubai’s fi rst foreclosure, which was supposed to ‘open the fl oodgates’ for other similar actions. The orders for foreclosure were issued by a Dubai enforcement judge in favour of Barclays Bank plc in its case against various borrowers who had taken mortgages on their real estate assets with Barclays.1 The orders were based on Dubai Law No 14 of 2008 (Law No 14), which relates to mortgages in Dubai. The orders puzzled commentators (mainly those with a common law background), who went to great lengths in trying to justify the measures taken by the judge and cautioned against the lack of court precedents in the UAE civil law system. Almost a year later, the fl oodgates remain closed and the orders look rather isolated in the Dubai judicial scene. In light of this, it is worth examining whether the orders were actually landmark verdicts and foreclosure actions. CIVIL CODE Lenders in the UAE are currently prohibited from owning directly distressed assets under Article 1420 of Federal Law No 5 of 1985 (the Civil Code), which relates to civil transactions. The Civil Code provides that: ‘If it is a condition of the mortgage agreement that the ownership of the asset be vested in the lender in consideration for its loan in the event that the borrower does not pay at maturity, or if there is a condition that the mortgaged asset is to be sold regardless of the legal procedures to be followed, the mortgage shall be valid but such condition shall be void. Such condition shall also be void even if it is provided in a subsequent agreement.’ The prohibition of lenders directly owning distressed assets is derived from elements of historic French law, specifi cally ‘prohibition du pacte commissoire’. (Although no legal texts explicitly prohibited a pacte commissoire relating to real estate assets, the prohibition did apply to moveable assets). Article 1419 of the UAE Civil Code provides that a lender may satisfy its debt out of the mortgaged asset on maturity date in accordance with the rank it holds, after following certain procedures, including those provided for in the UAE Civil Procedure Code (the Civil Procedure Code). The obligation for the lender to have recourse to the courts to satisfy its debt and not reach an out-of-court settlement on the security registered on a mortgaged property is called prohibition de la clause de voie parée. This principle is derived from French laws that infl uence both Egyptian and UAE law. The prominent Egyptian scholar Abdul Razzaq Al Sanhouri and the overwhelming majority of French scholars reason that such prohibitions are in the public interest because borrowers are in a much weaker positions than lenders. The reasoning for this protection is that lenders may impose any conditions that they choose on borrowers and unduly deprive them of all of their assets. In addition to these prohibitions protecting borrowers, scholars explain that entitling the lenders to own mortgaged assets would be contrary to the purpose of the mortgage itself, which is to grant the lender a right over the value of the asset and not over the asset itself. Are such prohibitions still valid? Arguably, they are not because banks and lending institutions are tightly controlled by bodies such as the Central Bank and other regulatory agencies, meaning that borrowers are protected and no longer in the weak position that they were when the prohibition was enacted. In March 2006 these considerations prompted the French legislature to amend the country’s civil code to allow lenders to Dubai mortgage law: much ado about nothing BY MAZEN BOUSTANY Head of banking and fi nance, Habib Al Mulla & Co ‘Banks and lending institutions are tightly controlled by bodies such as the Central Bank and other regulatory agencies, meaning that borrowers are protected and are no longer in a weak position.’ NOTE 1) Order dated 23 December 2009 by the Dubai enforcement judge in case no 85/2009. Barclays had also submitted cases no 86 and 87 before the same judge. November 2010 The In-House Lawyer 3 UAE Habib Al Mulla & Co acquire mortgaged real estate properties (apart from the borrowers’ main residence and certain other other exceptions). This move was designed to encourage consumption by allowing banks to lend more easily. Did Dubai follow suit by modernising with Law No 14? Could such a law issued by the Emirate of Dubai contravene the provisions of the Civil Code? Under UAE constitutional provisions, individual emirates cannot single-handedly amend federal laws. Having looked at Law No 14 more thoroughly, which is based on the Civil Code (among other pieces of legislation), it is arguable that there is no actual contravention of federal law and, more specifi cally, of the provisions of the Civil Code, but rather it was a subtle interpretation of such provisions that allowed the so-called landmark verdicts. Article 25 of Law No 14 provides that: ‘Upon default in payment of the debt when mature or upon fulfi llment of a condition granting early repayment status, the mortgagee/creditor or his universal or singular successor must provide the debtor or the person in possession of the mortgaged property 30 days’ notice through the Notary Public before commencing enforcement proceedings.’ Article 26 provides that: ‘If the mortgagor/debtor or his universal or singular successor or the guarantor in rem fails to pay the mortgagee within the period specifi ed in the preceding Article, the enforcement Judge shall, upon request of the mortgagee/creditor, order an attachment against the mortgaged property so that it can be sold by public auction in accordance with the applicable procedures of the Department [the Dubai Land Registry].’ The argument that there was no contravention of federal law is reinforced by the fact that Article 225 of the Civil Procedure Code provides for an enumeration of the enforcement deeds that include ‘legally registered and authenticated instruments’. This defi nition could very well apply to mortgage deeds as these documents have to be legally registered and authenticated by the Dubai Land Department (see Article 1400 of the Civil Code). CONCLUSION On close examination, Article 1419 of the Civil Code does not explicitly provide for a lawsuit on the merits before enforcing the mortgage deed, but merely refers to ‘the measures provided in the UAE Civil Procedure Code’, which are mainly procedures relating to sale by public auction. Therefore, the Dubai enforcement judge was merely following the relevant federal and local legislation when he issued the orders for foreclosure. The reports of landmark verdicts and Dubai’s fi rst foreclosure have proven to be false, since no amendment was made to the relevant legislation to allow any actual foreclosure.By Mazen Boustany, head of banking and fi nance, Dubai offi ce, Habib Al Mulla & Co. E-mail: mazen.boustany@habibalmulla.com.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

- hide

Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.