[Federal Register: August 20, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 161)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43554-43555]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20au01-35]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 14
RIN 1018-AH75
Conferring Designated Port Status on Anchorage, AK
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to make
Anchorage, Alaska, a designated port under section 9(f) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. This action would allow the direct
importation and exportation of wildlife through this growing
international port. We are proposing to amend the regulations in 50 CFR
Part 14 to reflect this designation. We will hold a public hearing to
collect comments on this change. We also seek written comments from the
public.
DATES: Submit comments on or before September 19, 2001. A public
hearing will be held at 6 PM, September 17, 2001. Submit requests to
present oral testimony at this hearing on or before August 30, 2001.
See Supplementary Information section for more information on the
public hearing.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials concerning this proposal should be
sent to: SAC-Branch of Investigations, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Office of Law Enforcement, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 500,
Arlington, Virginia 22203. Comments and materials may be hand-delivered
to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room
500, Arlington, Virginia, between the hours of 8 A.M. and 4 P.M.,
Monday through Friday. For public hearing comments or testimony, see
Supplementary Information section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Special Agent Steve Oberholtzer (703)
358-1949, or Special Agent Stanley Pruszenski, Assistant Regional
Director for Law Enforcement, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska (907) 786-3311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Endangered Species Act requires that all fish and wildlife,
with only limited exceptions, be imported and exported through
designated ports. Designated ports facilitate U.S. efforts to monitor
wildlife trade and enforce wildlife protection laws and regulations by
funneling wildlife shipments through a limited number of locations. The
Secretary of the Interior, with approval of the Secretary of the
Treasury, designates ports for wildlife trade by regulation after
holding a public hearing and collecting and considering public
comments. The Service presently has 13 designated ports of entry for
the importation and exportation of wildlife: Los Angeles, California;
San Francisco, California; Miami, Florida; Honolulu, Hawaii; Chicago,
Illinois; New Orleans, Louisiana; New York, New York; Seattle,
Washington; Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas; Portland, Oregon; Baltimore,
Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; and Atlanta, Georgia. The Service
maintains a staff of wildlife inspectors at each designated port to
inspect and clear wildlife shipments.
Regulatory exceptions allow certain types of wildlife shipments to
enter or leave the country through ports which are not designated.
Under certain conditions, importers and exporters can obtain a permit
from the Service authorizing their use of non-designated ports. The
importer or exporter will accrue additional fees associated with the
inspection and permit authorizing use of a non-designated port.
Need for Proposed Rulemaking
The proximity of Anchorage to the Asian continent has prompted the
State of Alaska, the City of Anchorage, and private groups such as
international express carriers, the Alaskan tourism industry, and the
outdoor recreational industry to target foreign trade markets as a way
to bring increased economic growth to Anchorage. Stevens International
Airport is expanding and a 100,000 sq. ft. warehouse is being
constructed to accommodate both the growth in airline passengers and
the 20 million tons of air freight that already pass through Anchorage
each year. This volume is one of the highest for any airport in the
United States, and future increases of 11.1 percent per year are
projected. International cargo off loaded in Anchorage has been
estimated at 341 million pounds for the year 2000.
Two large Anchorage international express carriers have regional
hubs in Anchorage. The volume of international shipments handled by
these facilities has increased from 18 to 22 percent each year over the
last five years. Parallel growth has occurred in the number of wildlife
shipments. Since the Service charges higher fees for inspecting and
clearing shipments at Anchorage and other non-designated ports,
wildlife importers using these facilities have asked that over 70
percent of their shipments be cleared at designated ports of entry in
the lower 48 states. Making Anchorage a designated port will facilitate
clearance of these shipments and reduce costs for all importers and
exporters bringing wildlife through this city.
Increases in international visitors to Alaska have also affected
the number of wildlife shipments requiring clearance. The number of
U.S. and foreign hunters requesting clearance of wildlife trophies in
Anchorage has increased by nearly 300 percent in the last five years.
The number of foreign hunters exporting Alaskan big game trophies has
jumped by 73 percent, adding substantially to the total number of
wildlife shipments cleared in Anchorage.
The Service's data for fiscal year 2000 show that the port of
Anchorage handled a total of 3,555 wildlife shipments with a declared
value of $9.3 million. Anchorage has the highest number of declared
wildlife shipments per wildlife inspector of any port in the Nation.
The Service projects that the number of wildlife shipments will triple
over the next three to five years following the establishment of
Anchorage as a designated port. This projection is based on trends
associated with the designation of the ports of Dallas-Fort Worth,
Portland, and Atlanta.
Existing and projected increases in air and express cargo along
with substantial growth in the number of airline passengers,
international visitors, and hunters seeking clearance of wildlife
[[Page 43555]]
imports and exports justify the proposed designation of the port of
Anchorage. This change will improve service to international mail
carriers, small businesses, and the public while maintaining effective
regulation of U.S. wildlife trade.
Notice of Public Hearing
Section 9(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1538(f)(1),
requires that the public be given an opportunity to comment at a public
hearing before the Secretary of the Interior confers designated port
status on any port. Accordingly, the Service has scheduled a public
hearing for September 17, 2001, from 6 PM to 8 PM. The hearing will be
held at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conference room located at
1011 East Tudor Road, Room 157, Anchorage, Alaska, 99503, (907) 786-
3311. All interested persons wishing to present oral or written
comments at this hearing should request approval in writing by August
30, 2001. The address for requesting approval is: Assistant Regional
Director for Law Enforcement, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East
Tudor Road, Room 155, Anchorage, Alaska 99503. If they desire, persons
requesting approval may submit a written copy of their proposed oral
comments.
Required Determinations
This rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866. In accordance with the
criteria in Executive Order 12866, this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action.
The Department of the Interior (Department) has determined that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The Service anticipates that the addition
of the port of Anchorage to the list of Service designated ports for
the importation and exportation of wildlife will have no adverse effect
upon individual industries and cause no demographic changes in
populations. In addition, the Service anticipates that this proposal
will not increase direct costs for small entities and will have no
effect upon information collection and record keeping requirements. In
light of this analysis, the Service has determined that the proposed
rule will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial
number of small entities as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
This proposed rule has no private property takings implications as
defined in Executive Order 12630. The only effect of this rule will be
to make it easier for businesses to import and export wildlife directly
through Anchorage, Alaska.
This action does not contain any federalism impacts as described in
Executive Order 13132.
This proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
The proposed changes in the regulations in part 14 are regulatory
and enforcement actions covered by a categorical exclusion from
National Environmental Policy Act procedures under 516 Department
Manual, Chapter 2, Appendix 1.10.
The proposed changes have no environmental justice implications
under Executive Order 12988.
A determination has been made under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act that the proposed revision of Part 14 will not affect
federally listed species.
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.), this rule, as proposed, will not ``significantly or
uniquely'' affect small governments.
This proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act.
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), Executive Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we
have evaluated possible effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that there are no effects. Individual tribal
members are subject to the same regulatory requirements as other
individuals who engage in the import and export of wildlife.
Author
The originator of this proposed rule is Special Agent Steve
Oberholtzer, Division of Law Enforcement , U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Washington, DC.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 14
Animal welfare, Exports, Fish, Imports, Labeling, Reporting and
record keeping requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Service proposes to
amend Chapter I, subchapter B of Title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below.
PART 14--IMPORTATION, EXPORTATION, AND TRANSPORTATION OF WILDLIFE
1. The authority citation for Part 14 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 668, 704, 712, 1382, 1538(d)-(f), 1540(f),
3371-3378, 4223-4244, and 4901-4916; 18 U.S.C. 42; 31 U.S.C. 9701.
2. Amend Sec. 14.12 by adding paragraph (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 14.12 Designated ports.
* * * * *
(n) Anchorage, Alaska.
Dated: July 20, 2001.
Joseph E. Doddridge,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 01-20870Filed 8-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P