An Answer to the Keystone Pipeline Emissions Debate

By Ryan Perez

Approval of The keystone oil sands pipeline has been on heavy debate for the last year, in regards to whether or not it can be created without a high increase
in greenhouse gas emissions. It has been a formidable battle on increasing jobs, and the economy for U.S. and especially Canada, and the effect on
the environment.

Bow Tie Kreative has stated that we are in the business of both increasing our profit margins here in Canada, as well as looking for the environment.
Our interest in the future is to research, and develop technology that will fund the economy, and benefit our future global environmental interests.
“TransCanada has waged a six-year effort to win presidential approval for the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry 830,000 barrels a day of
mostly oil sands crude from Alberta to the massive refining hub on the U.S. Gulf Coast,”(Giovannetti, McCarthy, 2015).

Saskatchewan there have been some progress on the ‘Boundary Project’, which “captures 90 per cent of the coal-fired electricity plant’s carbon dioxide
emissions,” (The Canadian Press, 2015). This will aid in the two countries ability to visualize diplomacy in rectifying the ten year debate on
how we can accomplish increasing the economy for both countries, producing jobs, and reducing emissions into the environment. Canada is about the
future, and so is Bow Tie Kreative. Bow Tie Kreative is about building independence, and providing solutions to companies, and individuals looking
for empowerment and growth.