Ron Paul 2012

There are better examples of fraud going on than the two things you posted no offense but the way they cut away from the cspan guy talking and cut back after he says Mitt Romney (and the change in audio) could have been edited, it also could be true, maybe he altered his speech when lying.

The poll could have easily been photoshopped. There is other, more concrete evidence of the fraud and black outs going on (even going back to the straw polls) Jon Stewart called out the media pretty blatantly, saying that Ron Paul has become the 13th floor on office buildings.

What is going on and for some reason people STILL want to deny it is the fraud and corruption going on at nearly every delegate selection that has heavy Paul support. The Romney camp knows they may be in for some trouble, kind of funny when we heard for months now that Romney had the nomination essentially cinched not too long ago.

__________________
"Originally posted by pokenose: We quit doing that secret Santa thing after the black guy got a bucket of fried chicken, watermelon jolly ranchers, a bottle of colt 45 and a cotton scented candle then someone else got a ball of that free twine you tie down your items with at ikea and a vibrator so you can go **** yourself if you didn't like the twine."

"Originally posted by AlphaNeo36:
Election fraud is perfectly acceptable when it intends to keep Ron Paul out of the White House."

There are better examples of fraud going on than the two things you posted no offense but the way they cut away from the cspan guy talking and cut back after he says Mitt Romney (and the change in audio) could have been edited, it also could be true, maybe he altered his speech when lying.

Look at the post right above you, I just proved the video wasn't edited.

my bad I had my message half typed and got distracted and saw that you posted. At first glance it kind of does seem like it was edited.

__________________
"Originally posted by pokenose: We quit doing that secret Santa thing after the black guy got a bucket of fried chicken, watermelon jolly ranchers, a bottle of colt 45 and a cotton scented candle then someone else got a ball of that free twine you tie down your items with at ikea and a vibrator so you can go **** yourself if you didn't like the twine."

"Originally posted by AlphaNeo36:
Election fraud is perfectly acceptable when it intends to keep Ron Paul out of the White House."

Unfortunately for you, the burden of proof is always on the claim that something exists rather than on the claim that something does not exist. So if you are going to suggest the video has been edited I expect at least some evidence supporting your claim. Otherwise you're just wasting your time.

Oh lolz.

__________________
“There are only two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don’t know it.” – G. K. Chesterton - The Mercy of Mr. Arnold Bennett, Fancies vs. Fads

__________________
“There are only two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don’t know it.” – G. K. Chesterton - The Mercy of Mr. Arnold Bennett, Fancies vs. Fads

"It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is "generally accepted" (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false."

Obviously this language far exceeds your mental capacity, but at least other posters on this forum can see how much of an idiot you are (assuming they didn't already).

"It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is "generally accepted" (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false."

Obviously this language far exceeds your mental capacity, but at least other posters on this forum can see how much of an idiot you are (assuming they didn't already).

So how did all that 9/11 was in inside job nonsense work out for you?

__________________

Magen VeLo Yera'e

Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.

"It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is "generally accepted" (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false."

Obviously this language far exceeds your mental capacity, but at least other posters on this forum can see how much of an idiot you are (assuming they didn't already).

If you are proposing an idea as fact (fraud), the burden of proof fall on your to adequately defend that proposal. If someone thinks their may be a fault in your proposal, you still have the burden of proof in showing that your original idea was not flawed. Now, obviously, if I am claiming for fact that the video is shopped, I have the burden of proof to show that it is, but if I am simply questioning the validity of your initial proposal, then you still retain the burden of proof in showing that your original idea is valid.

I understand burden of proof. I have grad school experience in philosophy and have written a paper on burden of proof (as it relates to religion) that got published. Your logic is flawed and your understanding of the burden of proof is laughable. Take your high school bull-**** philosophy and go somewhere else.

__________________
“There are only two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don’t know it.” – G. K. Chesterton - The Mercy of Mr. Arnold Bennett, Fancies vs. Fads

Yeah, well, my teacher brought a document to class saying you are wrong.

__________________

Overbear: better 10 innocent men be convicted, than a single guilty man go free to commit more crime.Overbear: I prefer that I be given a license to shoot anyone who would pick socialism or communism over the basic freedoms inherent to consumerism.MatrixBaller04 AKA EricS6661: I can guarantee something will happen between now and February 9th.yesme: i'm not saying you should invest in gold first off, you would be much better off to invest in food,stuff you use and will keep for a couple of years, like razorsBlake360: in highschool, my teacher's father worked for the CIA and she brought my class documents proving the Roswell crash was of extraterrestrial origin.

Yeah, well, my teacher brought a document to class saying you are wrong.

Oh then never mind, I secede.

__________________
“There are only two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don’t know it.” – G. K. Chesterton - The Mercy of Mr. Arnold Bennett, Fancies vs. Fads

Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.

If you are proposing an idea as fact (fraud), the burden of proof fall on your to adequately defend that proposal. If someone thinks their may be a fault in your proposal, you still have the burden of proof in showing that your original idea was not flawed. Now, obviously, if I am claiming for fact that the video is shopped, I have the burden of proof to show that it is, but if I am simply questioning the validity of your initial proposal, then you still retain the burden of proof in showing that your original idea is valid.

I understand burden of proof. I have grad school experience in philosophy and have written a paper on burden of proof (as it relates to religion) that got published. Your logic is flawed and your understanding of the burden of proof is laughable. Take your high school bull-**** philosophy and go somewhere else.

He did prove that the particular video clip in question was in fact real. This goes to suggest that the rest of the clips in the video are probably real.

He did prove that the particular video clip in question was in fact real.

He proved something wasn't shopped by showing that there are other videos that could have been shopped?

So I can prove that this wasn't shopped
because there are other photos that may have been shopped like this?

GUYS! I THINK WE JUST PROVED BIGFOOT!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MutR.

Also: their, there, they're.

Also: it's the internet. who cares?

__________________
“There are only two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don’t know it.” – G. K. Chesterton - The Mercy of Mr. Arnold Bennett, Fancies vs. Fads

Overbear: better 10 innocent men be convicted, than a single guilty man go free to commit more crime.Overbear: I prefer that I be given a license to shoot anyone who would pick socialism or communism over the basic freedoms inherent to consumerism.MatrixBaller04 AKA EricS6661: I can guarantee something will happen between now and February 9th.yesme: i'm not saying you should invest in gold first off, you would be much better off to invest in food,stuff you use and will keep for a couple of years, like razorsBlake360: in highschool, my teacher's father worked for the CIA and she brought my class documents proving the Roswell crash was of extraterrestrial origin.

Overbear: better 10 innocent men be convicted, than a single guilty man go free to commit more crime.Overbear: I prefer that I be given a license to shoot anyone who would pick socialism or communism over the basic freedoms inherent to consumerism.MatrixBaller04 AKA EricS6661: I can guarantee something will happen between now and February 9th.yesme: i'm not saying you should invest in gold first off, you would be much better off to invest in food,stuff you use and will keep for a couple of years, like razorsBlake360: in highschool, my teacher's father worked for the CIA and she brought my class documents proving the Roswell crash was of extraterrestrial origin.

The headline on Drudge says it all "Ron Paul OUT!" Link to the Washington Times article and it says "Ron Paul Ends His Hunt For Votes".
The first headline is NOT TRUE.
The second headline MAY BE.
Either way, read through the aricle and you will see that the inference that Paul is out of the race is absolutely not true. The article explains that Paul will abandon the game of going from state to state to trying to win a popular vote that doesn't count for anything. Instead he will focus on the states that are currently holding delegate conventions.

That strategy makes a lot of sense when you have the kind of fights in Oklahoma and Arizona we saw this weekend. The State Conventions is where the nominiation will be won or lost not traveling from state to state for beauty contests.