sen. johnson kept on harping about benghazi and how Hillary and Pres. Obama messed tried to cover it up.....and then Mr. Kerry asked him a simple question concerning whether johnson had attended the intel session in which everything about benghazi and sequence of events was explained.....predictably johnson said "no"

sen. johnson kept on harping about benghazi and how Hillary and Pres. Obama messed tried to cover it up.....and then Mr. Kerry asked him a simple question concerning whether johnson had attended the intel session in which everything about benghazi and sequence of events was explained.....predictably johnson said "no"

And people who came out of that bogus session said they came away with zilch from State Department clarifying wjhat occurred.

People who attended that briefing all said they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media.

I don't know what was said or shown in that briefing. But are you implying that all the people who attended that briefing said that they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media? If so, then all I need to do to prove you are a liar is point out that Kerry, in his exchange with Johnson, stated that he doesn't think that is the case, and Kerry is a person who attended that briefing.

Seriously 333386. You're like a child that upon getting caught eating cookies from the cookie jar immediately exclaims "I didn't eated a cookie mommy" while still munching. You are a liar and you have exactly zero credibility.

I don't know what was said or shown in that briefing. But are you implying that all the people who attended that briefing said that they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media? If so, then all I need to do to prove you are a liar is point out that Kerry, in his exchange with Johnson, stated that he doesn't think that is the case, and Kerry is a person who attended that briefing.

Seriously 333386. You're like a child that upon getting caught eating cookies from the cookie jar immediately exclaims "I didn't eated a cookie mommy" while still munching. You are a liar and you have exactly zero credibility.

Expressing further dissatisfaction with the thoroughness of the briefing on Benghazi they received from Secretary of State Clinton yesterday, two Republican Senators chastised the Obama administration for their “disrespect” and “disdain” for the U.S. Senate for not divulging more about the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

“We were told nothing,” McCain said on the Senate floor Friday afternoon of Thursday’s briefing to the full U.S. Senate by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, “We were told absolutely nothing. All because it’s an investigation going on.”

McCain then held up the Wall Street Journal’s story this morning with details on the attack by way of comparison.He said for a newspaper to have more detail than US Senators, after receiving a briefing from the government’s top officials, was the height of disrespect.

“It is that the disrespect to the institution of the senate when we are called together ostensibly to receive information, that information they tell us they can’t give us, and then it appears on the front page of the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. What does that mean about the attitude that this administration has to this body? Obviously it’s not one that I think is of respect.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham echoed the complaint, saying it was like “pulling teeth” to get information from the members of the administration yesterday.

“I was very disappointed in the briefing yesterday,” Graham said, “A lot of senators were frustrated. And you pick up major newspapers in the country and you find details not shared with you.”

Get more pure politics at ABC News.com/Politics and a lighter take on the news at OTUSNews.com

Expressing further dissatisfaction with the thoroughness of the briefing on Benghazi they received from Secretary of State Clinton yesterday, two Republican Senators chastised the Obama administration for their “disrespect” and “disdain” for the U.S. Senate for not divulging more about the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

“We were told nothing,” McCain said on the Senate floor Friday afternoon of Thursday’s briefing to the full U.S. Senate by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, “We were told absolutely nothing. All because it’s an investigation going on.”

McCain then held up the Wall Street Journal’s story this morning with details on the attack by way of comparison.He said for a newspaper to have more detail than US Senators, after receiving a briefing from the government’s top officials, was the height of disrespect.

“It is that the disrespect to the institution of the senate when we are called together ostensibly to receive information, that information they tell us they can’t give us, and then it appears on the front page of the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. What does that mean about the attitude that this administration has to this body? Obviously it’s not one that I think is of respect.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham echoed the complaint, saying it was like “pulling teeth” to get information from the members of the administration yesterday.

“I was very disappointed in the briefing yesterday,” Graham said, “A lot of senators were frustrated. And you pick up major newspapers in the country and you find details not shared with you.”

Get more pure politics at ABC News.com/Politics and a lighter take on the news at OTUSNews.com

Now you're changing things up - you're talking about Clinton's testimony and not the briefing that Kerry attended but Johnson did not. How very honest of you... but let's set that aside, shall we? You said that all the people in the meeting said that they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media. That's a blatant lie. Even if some did assert that, some isn't the same thing as all. Kerry clearly didn't think so, and Kerry was in that meeting.

For a lawyer, you aren't particularly good at wordplay. Are you sure you aren't a paralegal's replacement assistant? Or perhaps a stenographer?

Now you're changing things up - you're talking about Clinton's testimony and not the briefing that Kerry attended but Johnson did not. How very honest of you... but let's set that aside, shall we? You said that all the people in the meeting said that they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media. That's a blatant lie. Even if some did assert that, some isn't the same thing as all. Kerry clearly didn't think so, and Kerry was in that meeting.

For a lawyer, you aren't particularly good at wordplay. Are you sure you aren't a paralegal's replacement assistant? Or perhaps a stenographer?

LOL!!!!

Yeah - Kerry is really going to say he was dissappointed w the answers of clinton as he himself was lobbying for the job from Obama.

Now you're changing things up - you're talking about Clinton's testimony and not the briefing that Kerry attended but Johnson did not. How very honest of you... but let's set that aside, shall we? You said that all the people in the meeting said that they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media. That's a blatant lie. Even if some did assert that, some isn't the same thing as all. Kerry clearly didn't think so, and Kerry was in that meeting.

For a lawyer, you aren't particularly good at wordplay. Are you sure you aren't a paralegal's replacement assistant? Or perhaps a stenographer?

Now you're changing things up - you're talking about Clinton's testimony and not the briefing that Kerry attended but Johnson did not. How very honest of you... but let's set that aside, shall we? You said that all the people in the meeting said that they were offered nothing as far as answers or details other than what was in the media. That's a blatant lie. Even if some did assert that, some isn't the same thing as all. Kerry clearly didn't think so, and Kerry was in that meeting.

For a lawyer, you aren't particularly good at wordplay. Are you sure you aren't a paralegal's replacement assistant? Or perhaps a stenographer?

LOL.

Didn't you know? Law schools don't teach anything about facts and logic.