Proposed track still has questions

Saturday

Aug 31, 2013 at 12:01 AM

I am amazed that the "pro-trackers" have finally admitted that the money generated by the track is not all going to Indian River! Early on, the argument has been made by opponents of the proposed track location that Gaylord, Petoskey, Mackinaw City, Cheboygan and other communities will benefit far more than Indian River. They have the lodging and restaurants to accomodate the influx of 20,000+ people, while Indian River does not.
How accomodating of Indian River to endure all of the traffic congestion, noise, devaluation of homes, increased criminal activity, etc., while the surrounding communities are void of any negative impact from the track. It's a "no brainer" that these communities are in favor of a racetrack. Really?
Just a few more questions and comments about Mr. Edgerton's "facts and figures".
It was stated that it cost upwards of $400,000. to run a national motocross event. What is the profit?
He stated that there were some concerns with security. What are the concerns and what measures will be taken?
He commented on the elevation and landscape "soaking" up the noise. Has there been a professional impact study done?
He stated that at most, there would be four events every year. How and why does he believe this to be true when there are so many unknowns and variables involved? What if the track is sold to a new owner? The possibility does exist that there could be many more events than the four stated. Again, unknowns and variables.
Those opposed to the proposed track location have been demonized, trivialized, and disregarded through this whole process. Ignorance provokes one to assume that "an extremely small group is against the track". Arrogance provokes one to assume that 100 percent of the residents, businesses, and tourists should be in favor of the proposed track. It's been my experience that one should never assume.
Terrie Powers
Indian River