>Thanks to those who responded.
>On Jerry's point. Notwithstanding the Verwertung problem Nicolaus is I
>think better than CW. One problem with CW 28/29 is that the two bits
>were translated by different people with inconsistencies. ALso CW 29
>209 has reified instead of objectified which is quite a bad mistake.
>But I will have to compare systematically
>Chris
Hi Chris,
will be very interested of what you make of Tribe's argument that
Marx's thinking changes after the Grundrisse with the discovery of
Quesnay's theory of re-production. Anyone's thoughts on this would
be appreciated.
Yours, Rakesh