Mueller has seven (7) substantial
Vanguard holdings. Vanguard is another Clinton Foundation donor. Vanguard even paid $400,000 to Bill Clinton for speeches on Oct. 05 & 16, 2012. These Vanguard holdings conflict out Mueller from being involved in any proceedings regarding the Clintons.

ABOGADO NOMINEES LIMITED, Co. No. 01688036 ("ABOGADO" is the Spanish word for "ATTORNEY.) UK nominee accounts (currently representing 917 insiders, including many household names in the globalist pantheon; here's the Companies House original | Excel spreadsheet) appear to be an investment vehicle of choice for British peers, Privy Counsellors and their globalist friends so that they do not have to disclose their investments to the public. In the case APPLE EUROPE LIMITED investments however, the ABOGADO shareholders disclose their identities without disclosing their investment amounts. Like Russian nested dolls, APPLE/ABOGADO has at least four nominee accounts inside them, and no doubt, within them will be other nested nominees: CORE NOMINEES LIMITED ( 02424514),
FULLER NOMINEES LIMITED (04264633) PDF,*
I.W.S. NOMINEE COMPANY LIMITED (00760488) PDF,
JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOMINEES) LIMITED (04553031) PDF (including Juniper's subsidiaries in Belgium, Egypt, Greece, India, Tunisia, Brazil, Turkey, Russia and Mexico). Evidently, the British since founding the East India Company and The City of London UK have perfected the art of hiding insider relationships—all protected by the King or Queen and the Privy Council. Juniper Networks, the largest corporate networking company in the world, admitted on about Dec. 22, 2015 that they had voluntarily embedded the Dual_EC-DRBG backdoor encryption key for rogue NSA/C.I.A. intelligence, then pretended to remove it.

This certainly explains why Apple VP Eddy Cue hides his directorship in Apple Europe! It appears that Netflix and actor Kevin Spacey—both in in Adam Schiff's downline—were using personal knowledge in the Netflix series House of Cards.

Bookmark: #six-degrees | https://tinyurl.com/y4p2lqyzNew (2/17): You Are Wrong! Six Degrees!
The pushback to the facts in this Schiff sidebar from trolling lawyers (fake grassroots) is that the discovery of these Schiff nested conflicts of interest is ridiculous since, using their dubious argument, everyone would have conflicts of interest due to "six degrees of separation." To the contrary, in Six Degrees one might find a snowflake six connections away, unlike the globalist avalanche found with Cue and Schiff. Six Degrees is not an argument, it is an excuse. Conflicts are fact specific and cannot be swept away by such generalizations that are clearly intended to fool the unsuspecting. The conflict of interest laws require disclosure to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Besides, Six Degrees is not a scientific argument, it is a literary theory. In the hands of spies it has become a brainwashing curtain to hide nefarious activity behind. It originated with Hungarian author Frigyes Karinthy in 1929. He was an admirer of globalist H.G. Wells who was himself a member of the British War Propaganda Bureau (Wellington House) and the Robber Baron clique in 1914. Karinthy himself married psychiatrist Aranka Böhm and supported a one-world language called Esperanto. Psychiatry, fiction, propaganda, media, banking: The devil's brew.

ORIGINAL POST

Fig. 4—Amy Berman Jackson, judge assigned to the Robert Mueller prosecution of Roger Stone and other political targets of allies of Hillary Clinton and The Clinton Foundation.

(Feb. 04, 2019)—Theoretically, district courts randomly assign judges using a master calendar, prescreening, or some combination. With so many options and essentially no oversight from Chief Justice John Roberts, the process in high profile cases is fraught with corruption.

Jackson’s many Senior Executive Service (SES) shadow government companions

Fig. 6—James E. Boasberg, FISA judge, nominated by Barack Obama on the same day (Jun. 17, 2010) as Amy Berman Jackson. Boasberg attended both Yale Law where he became a member of Skull & Bones and Cambridge University now known to be the one-world schoolhouse designed by Cecil Rhodes.

Fig. 10—Leonard P. Stark, Rhodes Scholar like Bill Clinton. He also worked at Skadden Arps LLP, was assigned three weeks before trial to the Leader v. Facebook patent infringement trial, then confirmed as judge ten days after the trial where even though Leader proved on 11 of 11 claims that Facebook infringes its social networking invention. Stark ruled that Facebook could get off on fabricated evidence based solely on a single 1896 criminal case never before used in a civil trial where a jury ruled against a man without any evidence, only innuendo.

Remarkably, Stark wrote "There is nothing impermissible about such an analysis." [Note: There certainly Judge Stark, especially when you have failed to use the well-accepted rules in Pfaff and Group One to test the evidence upon which you based your impermissible opinion.] Patent rules require hard evidence (Pfaff, Group One), except in this outlier where Stark allowed Pfaff and Group One to be ignored. Stark's investments were almost entirely Fidelity.

In 2012, however, a dramatic shift occurred. Jackson reported only 44 holdings—a 74% drop in number of holdings. Also notable was that the holdings were all institutional and mutual funds—no private company stocks.

Did Jackson lose faith in her ‘Blue Chip’ investments? No.

Fig. 11—Hillary R. Clinton

A reasonable person will ask why Jackson dumped all her Blue Chip stocks.

Or did she?

Remarkably, at least 31 of her 2009 holdings in Blue Chip corporate stocks were in donors to The Clinton Foundation (The New York Times list).

* Material Omissions to Note: All Schedules B, Schedule of Contributors (Form 990, 990-EZ, 990-PF),
have had the names of the Contributors masked out completely, with the exception of Clinton Foundation, Schedule B, 2017
where the text was retrievable, albeit hiding not visible behind a transparent font that was discovered and rendered readable. All Schedules C, Political Campaign and Lobbying Activities (Form 990 or 990-EZ) have been removed from all returns.

QUESTION: Where did Jackson’s holdings in these Blue Chip private companies go by 2012?

ANSWER: She simply buried them inside crony mutual funds who were, or became, heavily invested in her favorite companies. This gave her the continuing benefit of those profits while hiding their relationship to the Clinton Foundation.

In other words, Jackson’s 2009 private company stock holdings in Clinton Foundation donors comprise about 80% of all holdings in AMG Yachtman I fund in 2012 alone.

And, AMG Yachtman I is just one (1) of Jackson’s 44 holdings reported in 2012. Indeed, despite any excuse like the “safe harbor” concept, Berman has an ethical duty in Canon 3 to disclose these conflicts.

In addition, the AMG Yachtman I (YACKX) Trustees and Officers consist of other known Clinton Foundation donors and operatives, specifically:

We are just warming up on Judge Jackson’s egregious conflicts of interest in the Mueller probe

Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to recuse if their involvement raises even the appearance of impropriety. Canon 3 requires recusal when the judge holds “even one share” in stock of an interested party in a litigation.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson has permitted her long-time former law partners from Trout Cacheris LLP, Robert Trout and Gloria B. Solomon, to represent parties in the Mueller matters. The appearance of impropriety and conspiracy with Mueller’s political agenda is evident.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson holds direct financial interests in at least three institutions (and probably more if we kept digging) who are notoriously-known donors to The Clinton Foundation (four Fidelity funds, two Capital One and two Vanguard funds). This is blatant, in your face impropriety requiring recusal.

Besides the legion of Fidelity conflicts, Mueller has seven (7) substantial
Vanguard holdings. Vanguard is another Clinton Foundation donor. Vanguard even paid $400,000 to Bill Clinton for speeches on Oct. 05 & 16, 2012. These Vanguard holdings conflict out Mueller from being involved in any proceedings regarding the Clintons.

While Jackson may have relied upon the dubious “safe harbor” “concept” (Judicial Conference scrambling of the financial disclosure rules in 2001) by disclosing only the fund name and not its underlying stock holdings, not even that concept applies here since three of her holdings are in Fidelity, Capital One and Vanguard that are notoriously known Clinton Foundation donors.

Fig. 14—Jeannie S. Rhee is Mueller's prosecutor on about 20 of his indictments despite her lack of experience, only having ever worked at Mueller's WilmerHale LLP firm and the Department of Justice.

Mueller’s go-to prosecutor in 36 cases is Jeannie S. Rhee. The majority of these cases are against Russians whose names appear suspiciously fabricated. Her biography shows that since Yale Law school she has only had jobs in and out of the Department of Justice and WilmerHale-Comey-Mueller.

Conclusion:

Judge Amy Berman Jackson cannot possibly avoid the requirement to recuse herself immediately from the Mueller cases due to her conflicts of interest both with Mueller and with Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

If she does not, the she obliterates even the semblance of judicial impartiality that is embodied in the Code of Conduct for Federal Judges—a Code she pledged an oath to uphold.

Every American patriot should storm the gates of government and demand Judge Jackson’s recusal. Even if they don't, anything she does must be thrown out because her continuing presence means everything that occurs is "the fruit of the poisonous tree."

68 comments:

This is incredible information! How is it that of ALL THE MANY judges available, Mueller picked Amy? She was even the Fast and Furious judge -the farce that hid the sins of Holder, Mueller and Comey. We know the answer - MORE Mueller corruption. This investigation is COMPLETELY COMPROMISED and should be shut down, NOW!

Whitney Webb. (Feb. 06, 2019). Leaked Wikileaks Doc Reveals US Military Use of IMF, World Bank as “Unconventional” Weapons. MintPress.

This “U.S. coup manual,” recently highlighted by WikiLeaks, serves as a reminder that the so-called “independence” of such financial institutions as The World Bank and IMF is an illusion and that they are among the many “financial weapons” regularly used by the U.S. government to bend countries to its will.

WASHINGTON – In a leaked military manual on “unconventional warfare” recently highlighted by WikiLeaks, the U.S. Army states that major global financial institutions — such as the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) — are used as unconventional, financial “weapons in times of conflict up to and including large-scale general war,” as well as in leveraging “the policies and cooperation of state governments.”

The document, officially titled “Field Manual (FM) 3-05.130, Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare” and originally written in September 2008, was recently highlighted by WikiLeaks on Twitter in light of recent events in Venezuela as well as the years-long, U.S.-led economic siege of that country through sanctions and other means of economic warfare. Though the document has generated new interest in recent days, it had originally been released by WikiLeaks in December 2008 and has been described as the military’s “regime change handbook.

Three years after Apple refused to give the federal government access to the devices used by the San Bernadino terrorists who killed and injured dozens in a mass shooting event, the company has given the office of the Special Counsel complete access to Trump advisor Roger Stone’s iCloud account, reports Apple Insider.

According to the Washington Post, Apple objected to giving the federal government backdoor access to the shooters iPhones, claiming it would “set a dangerous precedent.”

“From the beginning, we objected to the FBI’s demand that Apple build a backdoor into the iPhone because we believed it was wrong and would set a dangerous precedent. As a result of the government’s dismissal, neither of these occurred. This case should never have been brought.”

Fast forward to present, and we see that Apple no longer seems to have the same privacy concerns it once did in 2015. Without any fight, they simply turned over Roger Stone’s iCloud passwords and God knows what else, because Orange Man Bad. The fact that Apple views a political persecution less of a hill to die on than protecting the rights of terrorists who killed and maimed dozens of Americans is quite telling.

Actually, "The information provided on Stone is the same type of information that Apple provided from the San Bernardino shooter's device from 2016 after a warrant was served. Unlike the San Bernardino iPhone 5C, a device unlock has not been requested for Stone's devices, nor has one been performed."

A leading activist on the issue of electromagnetic radiation and its negative impacts on public health has described the rollout of 5G as a “massive health experiment” which could “become a global catastrophe.”

Arthur Robert Firstenberg is a well-known advocate for curtailing the development of 5G networks both in the US and internationally, claiming that super fast broadband could cause cancer in humans and wildlife, as well as exacerbating the symptoms of electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

Mary Kekatos, Emily Crane. (Mar. 28, 2018). New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's father has ties to a sex cult whose leader was just arrested at a luxury villa in Mexico and deported back to the US to face labor and sex trafficking charges

According to the New York Post, Rutnik was hired by Raniere as a lobbyist in 2004 and was later sued by him. The case was eventually settled for $100,000.

On Tuesday, a Gillibrand spokesman reiterated a November statement to the Post claiming that she knew nothing about the case.

'Senator Gillibrand had never heard of this group until she recently read about them in the newspaper,' said spokesman Glen Caplin.

'She is glad that federal and state prosecutors have taken action in this case.'

Raniere, 57, is the leader of NXIVM, a secretive group headquartered in Albany.

He is accused of branding female followers with his initials as part of an initiation ceremony.

David Knight. (Feb. 06, 2019). Abortion Is Fueled By A Demonic Hatred For Life. Infowars.

David Knight makes his way back into the news and gets right into the controversy surrounding Ralph Northam and how the narrative behind his abortion remarks are getting pushed away by the racist photo that has emerged.

Joe Gruters, a longtime Trump ally in the Sunshine State, is under fire from progressives and some far-right gay hating groups for his bill in the Florida Senate that would prevent employers from firing or otherwise discriminating against employees for being LGBT.

Progressives, who are generally never happy with any Republican support for the LGBT, have surprisingly claimed his bill doesn’t go “far enough.” As a gay man, who has read the bill and long supported Gruters for his forward thinking attitudes, I am left to wonder what exactly Florida progressives want to see more of in the bill.

Qatar, a small oil-rich country with outsized regional influence, has been engaged in secret cyber espionage operations on American soil while also spending millions of dollars to pay prominent Washington, D.C., insiders as part of an ongoing campaign to alter America's political landscape, according to former intelligence officials and other experts.

Qatar's influence operations have largely been unseen, but have enabled the country to amass outsized political influence across Europe and particularly in Washington, D.C., where some of the most powerful diplomats and political insiders are said to operate on Doha's behalf.

Tucker Carlson aired and narrated the FBI’s raid on Roger Stone’s home during his show Friday night.

Stone, a longtime confidant of President Donald Trump, was charged last month on seven counts, including five for making false statements to Congress, one for witness tampering and one for obstruction of a government proceeding.

“The new footage from Stone’s home shows CNN arriving about an hour before the agents did. The footage depicts what you’d expect if the FBI raided the home of a Mexican drug lord,” Carlson began. “For context, Roger Stone is a senior citizen accused of false statements to Congress. Take a look at what happened. It’s just before 5 a.m., and an SUV with a CNN cameraman arrives first to this quiet street in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.” (RELATED: Stone: Trump Did Not Direct Me To Contact Wikileaks)

Various trollers seem eager to lead our readers to believe that a judicial proceeding is "well-understood" as only refering to federal courts as in District, Appeals and Supreme Courts. This is pure deception.

For example, the patent court system is an "administrative" proceeding that currently has about 174 unelected "patent judges" that conduct proceedings to award, and in more cases every day, invalidate previously issued patents.

Look it up. The fact is the False Statements Accountability Act of 1996 was a ruse to confuse the public and throw the whole question of lying to the public into limbo and into a situation where sneaky lawyers (1/2 of Congress) lie and know that the 28 USC 1001 Subsection (b) would be their Get Out of Jail Free card.

This argument that the definition of "judicial proceeding" is well known is pure BS. Every administrative law judge in every agency of the government is a "judicial proceeding". If the False Statements Act wanted to make a distinction in the definition, opting out certain types of federal courts from Subsection (b), it had an affirmative duty to do so.

No, 28 USC 1001 Subsection (b) is a license for the Senior Executive Service (SES) shadow government (aka Deep State) to lie, cheat and steal.

Los Angeles, CA- Los Angeles Times reporter and assistant managing editor, Kristina Bellatori dropped another bombshell in what can only be described as the ongoing US Congressional and political sex and domestic violence scandal this afternoon.

“The Rob Porter domestic violence fiasco seems to have turned more than just the White House upside down,” Bellatori told The Net Spies via Skype. “Not only has everything been turned upside down, but it seems that abuse victims are literally falling from the sky.”

Bellatori was contacted by Will Bottom, who claims to be the gay lover of California Congressman, Adam Schiff. “Will contacted me and told me that he had been a victim for too long and wanted to speak out,” Bellatori told us. “Mr. Bottom stated that he has been Mr. Schiff’s gay lover for many years and has endured a plethora of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse.”

By now I’m sure you have heard about the terrifying pre-dawn raid on the house in Ft. Lauderdale where I live with my husband Roger Stone.

A little before 6am, twenty-nine assault weapon wielding FBI agents in full tactical gear, and wearing night vision goggles, surrounded our home. Because I am hearing impaired and I was sleeping, I did not hear the commotion when an FBI agent pounded on the door demanding my husband open it. I did not know he had been handcuffed and taken into custody.

I woke up only when two FBI agents burst into our bedroom and demanded that I get out of bed at gunpoint. I was marched out to the street in front of our house wearing only a night gown and in bare feet. I was instructed to stand next to my husband who was handcuffed and also barefooted. I am not charged with any crime.

The following is the latest in a series of excerpts from my New York Times bestseller “Stonewalled,” which recounts the government intrusions of my computers. More excerpts to follow. Links to previous excerpts are below.

It’s July 2014 and one member of my team, Don Allison of KoreLogic, has been working on my computer puzzles for more than a year. I’ve come to understand why he came so highly recommended. The work has been difficult and tedious. But there’s no great hurry. Patience must be exercised. His task has been to unmask some of the most sophisticated computer intrusion efforts in existence. And he’s gathering clues and intel. Revealing new information, even now, about the surveillance of both my work and personal computers by an outside presence.

Regarding my work laptop, Don tells me that his analysis shows CBS had the means and opportunity through corporate software to perform its own inside, complete remote acquisition and forensic analysis of the laptop as well as other platforms on their network as soon as I first informed them of the intrusion. If they did so, they didn’t tell me about it. Don can see that one party looking through my laptop showed particular interest in my Benghazi reporting work, opening and reading a key file.

Evie Fordham. (Feb. 09, 2019). TRUMP WEIGHS IN ON ‘HATRED AND SCORN’ FROM DEMOCRATS AT HEARING WITH MATTHEW WHITAKER. The Daily Caller.

President Donald Trump weighed in Saturday on the “hatred and scorn” coming from House Democrats questioning acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker during a hearing Friday.

“The Democrats in Congress yesterday were vicious and totally showed their cards for everyone to see,” Trump wrote on Twitter Saturday. “When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn! The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!”

The Democrats in Congress yesterday were vicious and totally showed their cards for everyone to see. When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn! The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2019

Members from both sides of the aisle questioned Whitaker during a House Judiciary Committee hearing Friday. Whitaker’s exchanges with House Democrats sometimes got heated. Democratic Texas Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee held up a copy of the Constitution and became outraged when Whitaker refused to answer her questions with “yes” or “no.”

President Donald Trump’s El Paso visit is a great opportunity to point out that the west Texas city is a rats’ nest of law enforcement corruption, a major smuggling route into the U.S. for Mexican drugs, illegal immigrants, and Islamic terrorists and the headquarters of a sophisticated narco-terror ring operated by two of the FBI’s most wanted. While local officials promote it as one of America’s safest cities, Judicial Watch has exposed in a years-long investigation the disturbing reality gripping the municipality that sits along the Rio Grande across famously violent Ciudad Juárez, Mexico.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) says El Paso is a major hub for Mexican opioids and methamphetamine enroute to the rest of the United States. Just a few days ago U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) released figures showing that the El Paso sector had an astounding 1,588% increase in illegal immigrant apprehensions during the first month of 2019 compared to the first month of 2018. Most are coming from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

‘It’s outrageous that the FEC has sat around and done nothing—especially with such a detailed, comprehensive paper trail handed to them,’ lawyer Dan Backer told The Federalist.

Tuesday evening the Committee to Defend the President (CDP) filed a motion in a D.C. federal court seeking to supplement the complaint it had filed against the Federal Election Committee (FEC) in April 2018. In its original complaint, the CDP alleged that the agency responsible for enforcing campaign-finance law failed to act on an administrative complaint the CDP had filed with the FEC. That complaint charged that, during the 2016 presidential election, Democrats illegally funneled approximately $84 million through the Hillary Victory Fund to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which then illegally coordinated with the Hillary Clinton campaign.

To understand the alleged scheme requires familiarity with controlling campaign-finance law and campaign contribution limits. As I explained at the time CDP sued the FEC last April:

This post/analysis in 2014 stands the test of time. We have pulled out and highlighted the “even one share” portion of the judicial rules on disclosing conflicts that Amy Berman Jackson is so flagrantly violating. To those that think our recent posts about all the financial conflicts from the swamp bottom feeders are ‘much to do about nothing’, think again.

Even ONE SHARE must be disclosed.It’s not illegal to own the shares, but our politicians MUST disclose this info….and judges must recuse themselves with even ONE SHARE of conflict. To date, they haven’t done diddly squat except lie, lie, and lie again. Oh yeah…and fill their offshore bank accounts from the gains of illegal activities.

Attached is an article I have written in response to various statements made concerning the border wall between Mexico and the USA.

I amD___ V. P___(___) ____-________@___.com

I have been amused at times and then amazed at the depth of ignorance shown by those attempting to demonstrate the unfairness and indeed bigotry and racism inherent in the idea of a border wall or physical barrier between The United States and Mexico.

First, the designation as “Trump's Wall”. This ignores the fact that both Presidents Clinton and Bush supported the construction of just such a physical barrier.

Equating the Berlin Wall with a border barrier between the USA and Mexico is sort of disingenuous. The real reason was because the Communist regime discovered that large numbers of East Germans along with others, were defecting to the west. The ranks of well qualified professionals were being depleted. Therefore, the wall was built to keep people from leaving not entering.

A wall will send an, “inflammatory message” message to the world. I doubt that China, Russia, India, Thailand, Japan or Kazakhstan will ring their hands and deliver official protests over such a barrier. That it might inflame those insisting on right of entry and certain local politicians, is a given.

The appeal to the words inscribed on the base of the statue of Liberty, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to be free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore...” as an assurance of unconditional entry ignore the existence or a nearby facility called Ellis Island where over twenty million immigrants were quarantined upon arrival until cleared for entry into the United States.

It is suggested that a border barrier should be equated with some of he darkest moments of our history, ie. the internment or Japanese-American citizens and Alaska natives during WWII. Only those living at that time would understand the very serious situation facing the nation and the President. It was a drastic response to a national crisis the outcome of which was uncertain and would decide whether or not the United States would remain free country or be dominated by a cruel oppressive ideology.

That idea that walls or physical barriers are a sign of intolerance, bigotry and racism is it itself evidence of intolerance. For years I lived in a part of the world where walls surrounded not only private dwellings of the rich, middle class or poor, but the entire village or city. The message of the walls was not, “I'm better than you” or “I don't like your ethnic background” or “I'm afraid of you”. It was simply, “Come in at the gate”.

Yes, the United States of America has its dark spots which will always be a reminder of its worst days. But lets remember that on at least two and maybe three occasions its existence was the deciding factor between whether the rest of the world world be free orenslaved. And that freedom was bought at a very high price. Lets not throw away the USA.

The pushback to the facts in this Schiff sidebar from trolling lawyers (fake grassroots) is that the discovery of these Schiff nested conflicts of interest is ridiculous since, using their dubious argument, everyone would have conflicts of interest due to "six degrees of separation." To the contrary, in Six Degrees one might find a snowflake six connections away, unlike the globalist avalanche found with Cue and Schiff. Six Degrees is not an argument, it is an excuse. Conflicts are fact specific and cannot be swept away by such generalizations that are clearly intended to fool the unsuspecting. The conflict of interest laws require disclosure to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Besides, Six Degrees is not a scientific argument, it is a literary theory. In the hands of spies it has become a brainwashing curtain to hide nefarious activity behind. It originated with Hungarian author Frigyes Karinthy in 1929. He was an admirer of globalist H.G. Wells who was himself a member of the British War Propaganda Bureau (Wellington House) and the Robber Baron clique in 1914. Karinthy himself married psychiatrist Aranka Böhm and supported a one-world language called Esperanto. Psychiatry, fiction, propaganda, media, banking: The devil's brew.

Ever wonder why people hate lawyers? Consider Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s non-denial denial of his participation in discussions of an attempted coup against the duly elected president of the United States.

The story is being given a second life thanks to the hype surrounding the rollout of a new book by Andrew McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI.

McCabe, of course, was fired after an inspector general investigation found that he leaked investigative information and then lied about it. He has been referred to the Justice Department for consideration of a false-statements prosecution.

FBI Covered Up Potential Violations of Law by Hillary Clinton Docs Show State/FBI Bribery Scandal to Help Protect Hillary Clinton

Left Tries to Torpedo Census Question About Citizenship!

How the Deep State Colludes with Its Friends in the Media

FBI Covered Up Potential Violations of Law by Hillary Clinton

As we watch the slow-motion coup against President Trump let’s not forget that at its heart is the Deep State’s desire to protect Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her illicit behavior.

Now we have more evidence of their cover-up. We just received 186 pages of records from the Department of Justice that include emails documenting an evident cover-up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

We obtained the records through a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit we filed after the DOJ failed respond to a December 4, 2017 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). Judicial Watch is seeking all communications between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page.

The new emails came in response to a May 21 order by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton to the FBI to begin processing 13,000 pages of records exchanged exclusively between Strzok and Page between February 1, 2015, and December 2017. The FBI may not complete review and production of all the Strzok-Page communications until at least 2020.

FBI Covered Up Potential Violations of Law by Hillary Clinton

As we watch the slow-motion coup against President Trump let’s not forget that at its heart is the Deep State’s desire to protect Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her illicit behavior.

Now we have more evidence of their cover-up. We just received 186 pages of records from the Department of Justice that include emails documenting an evident cover-up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

We obtained the records through a January 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit we filed after the DOJ failed respond to a December 4, 2017 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). Judicial Watch is seeking all communications between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page.

The new emails came in response to a May 21 order by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton to the FBI to begin processing 13,000 pages of records exchanged exclusively between Strzok and Page between February 1, 2015, and December 2017. The FBI may not complete review and production of all the Strzok-Page communications until at least 2020.

President Trump’s long-time advisor Roger Stone was infamously arrested by 29 FBI agents and U.S. Marshals last month in a pre-dawn raid on his Florida home which was aired live on national cable television by CNN.

Since then, the Department of Justice has been severely criticized for an expensive and brutal and needless show of force in a non-violent case in which Stone was represented by counsel known to the government; was not armed; does not own a gun; was not a flight risk; and was not a danger to society.

The federal magistrate judge, before whom his captors brought him shortly after his arrest, apparently agreed with the critics of the government’s Gestapo-like behavior as the judge required only Mr. Stone’s written promise to show up in court as bail – no cash, no bond, no property required.

Since his release, Stone has been defending himself aggressively in the media. Last week, those aggressive defenses were criticized somewhat by the trial judge in his case. She has threatened to impose a gag order in the case.

The newly obtained emails came in response to a court ordered Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that the DOJ had previously ignored

The top brass of the Obama FBI went to great lengths to justify their decision not to recommend charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, according to Judicial Watch, which obtained evidence that the agency created a ‘chart’ of Clinton’s offenses.

The newly obtained emails came in response to a court ordered Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that the DOJ had previously ignored.

This discovery began when Apple VP Eduardo H. “Eddy” Cue failed to disclose his directorship in APPLE EUROPE LIMITED (UK) in his official Apple biography where such material relationships must be disclosed to the public

Feb. 16, 2019—Many experts in mind control and propaganda have suspected for some time that Rep. Schiff is a product/victim of Tavistock and the C.I.A.’s MKUltra psychological conditioning program for stay-behind Five Eyes (US, UK, CA, NZ, AU intelligence)/U.N./EU/NWO agents and assets. This new evidence shows an unquestionable link to the London-based Tavistock Institute and Russia (Gazprom).

Daily Caller. (Feb. 17, 2019). MEDIA HYPES ROGER STONE ‘REVELATION’ THAT HAS BEEN PUBLIC FOR A YEAR. Infowars.

The filing seemingly refers to communication Stone had with WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, which have already been made public

News outlets and media pundits on Friday seized on a court filing in the special counsel’s case against Roger Stone that referred to communication the longtime Trump confidant had with WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the group of alleged Russian operatives suspected of stealing Democrats’ emails during the 2016 campaign.

The court filing, which was touted as new, bombshell evidence by numerous news sources, including CNN and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, may be less than meets the anti-Trump eye.

The filing seemingly refers to communication Stone had with WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, which have already been made public. Those interactions, some of which Stone has released himself, show brief and seemingly innocuous encounters with both WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2.0.

NOTICE TO COMMENTERS: When the MSM diatribe on "fake news" began, our regular commenters were blocked from posting comments here. Therefore, email your comments to a new secure email addess afi@leader.com and we will post them.

SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) HIJACKED THE INTERNET

Roger Stone Speaks: On Nov. 18, 2017, Twitter censored New York Times best-selling author Roger Stone completely. Every red-blooded American should be outraged, Republican, Democrat and Independent alike. If Roger's voice is silenced today, yours is next. We must break this embargo. Click here to read and share Roger's latest perspectives on the Battle for our Republic, including his responses to his critics (who have not been censored).

BARACK OBAMA'S DARK POOLS OF CORRUPTION

STOP FACEBOOK PROPERTY THEFT

WILL HUMANKIND EVER LEARN? Facebook's Orwellian doublespeak about property and privacy (theft) merely repeats the eventual dehumanization of the individual under MAO's Red Star, Stalin's SOVIET Hammer & Cycle and Hitler's NAZI Swastika. Respect for the inalienable rights of each individual is a bedrock value of democracy. The members of the Facebook Cabal abuse this principle at every opportunity. They evidently believe that they deserve special privileges and are willing to lie, cheat and steal in order to treat themselves to these privileges.

ASK CONGRESS: PASS THE INVENTOR PROTECTION ACT!

Click image above to download a poster-quality PDF optimized for a 11in. x 17in. (ledger-size) poster. America should not be in the business of cheating its entrepreneurial investors simply because the cheaters buy off judges with the money gained from their theft. Such permissiveness is obscene.

LEADER V. FACEBOOK BACKGROUND

Jul. 23, 2013 NOTICE:DonnaKlineNow! has gone offline. All her posts are available as a PDF collection here (now updated, post-Scribd censorship).

Mar. 20, 2014 READER NOTICE: On Mar. 7, 2014, all of our documents linked to Scribd were deleted by that "cloud" service using the flimsiest of arguments . Some of our documents have been there for two years and some had almost 20,000 reads.

George Orwell wrote in 1984 that one knows one is in a totalitarian state when telling the truth becomes an act of courage.

This statement followed right after Davis cited Facebook's chief inside counsel in the Leader v. Facebook case, Theodore Ullyot, who appears to have helped lead the Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption. Interesting word choices associated with Gibson Dunn LLP: manipulation, smear. Attorneys swear a solemn oath to act morally, ethically, and in support of democratic principles. They promise to conduct themselves in a manner than instills confidence among the citizenry in the rule of law and the judicial system. These promises appear to be meaningless. Click here for a PDF version of Julie Davis' article.

OUR MISSION

American citizens must fight abuse of the constitutional right for authors and inventors to enjoy the fruits of their inventions, as a matter of matter of basic property rights and sound public policy. Otherwise, instead of innovation, creativity, genius, ideas, vision, courage, entrepreneurship, respect, property, rejuvenation, morals, ethics, values, renewal, truth, facts, rights, privacy, solutions and judicial faithfulness,

If we do not speak up, impeach derelict judges and imprison corrupt attorneys, we cannot possibly hope to start fixing the current ills in our society. Without justice and respect for private property, democracy has no sure foundation.

CURRENT EDITORIAL FOCUS

We are an opinion blog that advocates for strong intellectual property rights. We welcome commenters and contributors. The Leader v. Facebook patent infringement case first came to our attention after learning that the trial judge, Leonard P. Stark, U.S. District Court of Delaware, ignored his jury’s admission that they had no evidence to support their on-sale bar verdict, but the judge supported it anyway.

The judicial misconduct has deteriorated from there, replete with two of the three judges on the Federal Circuit appeal panel, Judges Alan D. Lourie and Kimberly A. Moore, holding Facebook stock that they did not disclose to the litigants, and later tried to excuse through a quick motion slipped in at the last minute by the Clerk of Court, Jan Horbaly, and his close friends at The Federal Circuit Bar Association. (The DC Bar subsequently revealed that Mr. Horbaly is not licensed to practice law in Washington D.C.)

The judges ignored shocking new evidence that Mark Zuckerberg withheld 28 hard drives of 2003-2004 evidence from Leader Technologies that could prove actual theft (and therefore claims even more serious than infringement). In addition, Facebook's appeal attorney, Thomas G. Hungar of Gibson Dunn LLP, has close personal ties to just about every judicial player in this story. The misconduct appears to reach into the U.S. Patent Office through abuse of the reexamination process by Facebook. We will stay focused on Leader v. Facebook until justice is served, but we also welcome news and analysis of intellectual property abuse in other cases as well.

WELCOME TO DONNA KLINE NOW! READERS!

AFI has been supporting Donna and is now picking up the main Leader v. Facebook coverage (she will continue coverage as well).

Anonymous Posts Are Welcomed! Blogger has more posting constraints than Donna's WordPress, but we will continue to welcome anonymous posts. Simply send us an email at NEW Leader® Private Email:afi@leader.com with your post. Once the moderator verifies that your email address is real, your comment will be posted using your real name or handle, whatever you wish, like John Smith or Tex.

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR U.S. JUDGES

GALLERY OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

Judge Leonard P. Stark, U.S. District Court of Delaware, trial judge in Leader Techs, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., 770 F. Supp. 2d 686 (D.Del. 2011). Judge Stark heard his jury foreman admit that the jury made the on-sale bar decision without any evidence other than speculation, and yet he supported that verdict anyway. Just months before trial, Judge Stark allowed Facebook to add the on-sale bar claim after the close of all fact discovery and blocked Leader from preparing its defenses to this new claim.
Judge Stark allowed the claims despite Leader's prophetic argument that the action would confuse the jury and prejudice Leader. He also permitted the jury to ignore the Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. test for on-sale bar, even after instructing the jury to use it. (See that Jury Instruction No. 4.7 here.) He also contradicted his own instruction to Leader to answer Interrogatory No. 9 in the present tense (2009), then permitted the jury to interpret it as a 2002 admission as well. Facebook's entire on-sale bar case is based upon this interrogatory. (Editorial: Hardly sufficient to meet the "heavy burden" of the clear and convincing evidence standard.)

Judge Alan D. Lourie, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, panel judge in Leader Techs v. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Judge Lourie stood to benefit financially from undisclosed holdings in Facebook. See analysis of Judge Lourie's T. Rowe Price holdings re. the Facebook IPO. Judge Lourie also failed to apply his own law-test in Group One v. Hallmark Cards to the evidence. After debunking all of Facebook's evidence on appeal, Judge Lourie created new argument in the secrecy of chambers to support Facebook and prevent the on-sale bar verdict from being overturned—a clear breach of constitutional due process.

Judge Kimberly A. Moore, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, panel judge in Leader Techs v. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Judge Moore stood to benefit financially from undisclosed holdings in Facebook. See disclosure of substantial holdings in Facebook and Facebook-related stocks. Judge Moore failed to follow the long-held precedent for testing on-sale bar evidence in Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.—an evident and intentional omission coming from a former patent law professor. After debunking all of Facebook's evidence on appeal, Judge Moore created new argument in the secrecy of chambers to support Facebook and prevent the on-sale bar verdict from being overturned—a clear breach of constitutional due process.

Judge Evan J. Wallach, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, member of the three-judge panel in Leader Techs v. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Judge Wallach is not a patent attorney. This begs the question as to why a judge with no knowledge of patent law was assigned to the case. Would anyone ask a dentist to perform brain surgery? The Federal Circuit was specially formed to appoint patent-knowledgeable judges to patent cases.
There is no evidence so far in the judicial disclosures that Judge Wallach holds stock in Facebook, although when he was asked on a motion to disclose potential Facebook holdings and other conflicts of interest, he refused along with the other judges. See Motion to Disclose Conflicts of Interest.
Judge Wallach continued in silence even after Clerk of Court Horbaly failed to provide him with Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam’s motions (according to his Federal Circuit staffer Valeri White), and yet the Clerk signed an order regarding that motion on Judge Wallach’s behalf. See a full analysis of these events at Donna Kline Now! Judge Wallach also failed to police his court’s violation of Leader’s Fifth and 14th Amendment constitutional right to due process when he participated in the fabrication of new arguments and evidence for Facebook in the secrecy of judge's chambers after he had just invalidated Facebook’s sole remaining item of evidence (using disbelieved testimony as ostensible evidence of an opposite).
Judge Wallach also failed to police his court when he failed to apply the Supreme Court's Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. test for on-sale bar evidence, which included even the Federal Circuit’s own Group One v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. test—a test which Judge Lourie should have advised Judge Wallach to follow since Judge Lourie helped write that opinion. Group One test omission analysis.

Clerk of Court Jan Horbaly, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, clerk who signed all the opinions in Leader Techs v. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Clerk Horbaly and his staff obfuscated when the court's ruling was challenged by an amicus curiae brief revealing clear mistakes of law and new evidence. See analysis of the misconduct and misrepresentations within the Federal Circuit Clerk of Court in Leader v. Facebook.
Mr. Horbaly failed to disclose his conflicts of interest and close associations with numerous Facebook attorneys and law firms, as well as his close association with one of Facebook's largest shareholders, Microsoft, who is a Director of The Federal Circuit Bar Association where Mr. Horbaly is an ex officio officer. Additionally, the DC Bar revealed in a written statement that Clerk Horbaly is not licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia. [Editorial: What does that make the Federal Circuit with its location within in a stone's throw of the White House? A self-governing state?]

Judge Randall R. Rader, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, chief judge responsible for the (mis)conduct of his judges and Clerk of Court in Leader Techs v. Facebook, Inc., 678 F.3d 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Judge Rader failed to manage his court resulting in a likely situation where his judges never even received briefs that they allegedly ruled on in favor of Facebook. Judge Rader also failed to disclose his conflicting relationships with a Leader principle with whom he may have had deep professional differences during his time at the Senate Judiciary Committee—his former professor of law at George Washington University Law Center, former Leader director Professor James P. Chandler. See analysis of Judge Rader's undisclosed conflicts of interest in Leader v. Facebook.
Judge Rader also did not stop his judges from creating new arguments and evidence for Facebook in the secrecy of chambers—after they had debunked all of Facebook's evidence on appeal, which is a clear breach of constitutional due process.

NOTICE: Opinion

This is an opinion blog. Any information contained or linked herein should be independently verified and should be considered the sole opinion of the writer. Free Speech and Freedom of the Press are protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and other local, state, national and international laws. Therefore, as with all opinion, such opinion should not be relied upon without independent verification.

This site is a not-for-profit effort focused on education, news, investigation of issues in the public interest, and research, and relies on fair use copyright exemptions under 17 U.S.C. 106(a)-117 of the United States Copyright Act, in addition to any and all other related and relevant privileges to which a fair and reasonable person would attribute to this grassroots effort to root out corruption and promote justice. No rights whatsoever to third party content are claimed or implied.

AFI LOGO (with text)

AFI LOGO (no text)

CORRUPTION WATCH LIST

Faces of the Facebook Corruption (PDF) (currently being updated after the Fri. Mar. 7, 2014 Scribd censorship of this document:

Here is the cast of characters in Leader v. Facebook. We encourage you to report their corrupt activities to this site and others, like Lawless America. Feel free to communicate anonymously in any way in which you are most comfortable. The attempt of these people and their organizations to corrupt American justice and commerce cannot be tolerated. Vigilance. We will expose them. See Congressional Briefings (currently being updated after Scribd censored the documents on Fri. Mar. 7, 2014).

A. Facebook's law firms:

Fenwick & West LLP (Facebook securities and patent law firm; former Leader Technologies counsel; attempted an appearance in Leader v. Facebook; did not seek conflicts waiver from Leader prior to representing Facebook)

Federal Circuit Bar Association ("FCBA") (Federal Circuit's bar association; second largest in the U.S.; Facebook's law firms extert much influence in its policy and activity, incl. Fenwick & West LLP, Gibson Dunn LLP, Orrick Herrington LLP, Weil Gotschal LLP; Facebook's large shareholder, Microsoft, is a director; Federal Circuit Clerk of Court Jan Horbaly is an officer; FCBA made an appearance in Leader v. Facebook to oppose the amicus curiae (friend of the court) motion of Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, former Director of Network Architecture at Sun Microsystems, in favor of Leader Technologies and objecting to the evident conflicts of interest within the court itself, her motion was denied, the judges refused to disclose their conflicts which we now know include Facebook and Microsoft stocks)

DC Bar Association

Perkins Coie LLP (Facebook's "rapid response enforcement team;" law firm for Obama's chief counsels, the husband and wife team of Robert F. Bauer and Anita B. Dunn; Bauer was identified on Aug. 1, 2013 as having directed the IRS targeting of the Tea Party)

Stroz Friedberg (Facebook’s "forensic expert" who manipulated the data in Paul Ceglia v. Mark Zuckerberg, and who first revealed the existence of 28 Zuckerberg hard drives and Harvard emails that they told Leader Technologies in 2009 were "lost")

Chandler Law Firm Chartered (Professor James P. Chandler, III, principal; Leader Technologies patent counsel; adviser to IBM and David J. Kappos; adviser to Eric H. Holder, Jr. and the U.S. Department of Justice; author of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and the Federal Trade Secrets Act)

President Barack Obama (appointed Leonard P. Stark to the judge's seat in Delaware Federal District Court eight days after Stark's court allowed Facebook to get away with jury and court manipulation of an on-sale bar verdict which was attained without a single piece of hard evidence; Barack and Michelle Obama were evidently protecting their 47 million "likes" on Facebook)

James W. Breyer, Accel Partners LLP; Facebook director; client of Fenwick & West LLP since the 1990's; apparently received technology from other Fenwick clients that was shuffled to Zuckerberg, incl. Leader Technologies' inventions)

Thomas J. Kim (SEC, Chief Counsel & Assoc. Director) approved Facebook's 500-shareholder exemption on Oct. 14, 2007, one day after it was submitted by Fenwick & West LLP; Facebook used this exemption to sell $3 billion insider stock to the Russians Alisher Asmanov, Yuri Milner, DST, Digital Sky, Mail.ru which pumped Facebook's pre-IPO valuation to $100 billion; another Harvard grad, Kim worked at Latham & Watkins LLP which was the chief lobbyist for the National Venture Capital Association in 2002-2004 whose Chairman was . . . James W. Beyer, Accel Partners LLP; in other words Breyer and Kim, both Harvard grads, were associated at the time of the Zuckerberg hacking and theft of Leader Technologies' software code)

Tesla Motors (received $465 million in Obama stimulus funds and hired Cooley's Michael Rhodes in the seven months before the Leader v. Facebook trial, just before veteran Judge Joseph Farnan made the surprise announcement of his retirement, just six days after Facebook's disasterous Markman Hearing)

Solyndra (received $535 million in Obama stimulus at the recommendation of the Cooley-McBee Strategic "consulting" alliance)

BrightSource (received $1.6 billion in Obama stimulus at the recommendation of the Cooley-McBee Strategic "consulting" alliance)

John P. Breyer (father of James W. Breyer; founder of IDG Capital Partners - China; coached his son on exploiting Western markets while he quietly built a venture capital business in China for the last 20 years; the real brain behind the Breyer exploitations

IDG Capital Partners (China) (founded by John P. Breyer, the father of James W. Breyer, Accel Partners; the current launderer of the tens of billions James W has fleeced from the U.S. market from the bailout, stimulus and the "pump & dump" Facebook IPO schemes)

Goldman Sachs (received US bailout funds; then invested with DST in Facebook private stock via Moscow; took Facebook public; locked out American investors from investing)

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (granted Fenwick & West's application on behalf of Facebook for an unpredented exemption to the 500 shareholder rule; opened the floodgated for Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to make a private market in Facebook pre-IPO insider stock; facilitated the influx of billions of dollars from "dubious" sources associated with Russian oligarchs, Alisher Asmanov and Yuri Milner, and the Kremlin; Goldman Sachs is a partner with this Moscow company, Digital Sky Technologies, aka DST, aka Mail.ru)

CGI Federal (US division of a Canadian company; Donated $47 million to Obama's reelection, then received the no-bid contract to build the ill-fated Obamacare website; Michelle Obama's Princeton classmate, Toni Townes-Whitely, is a Senior Vice President of CGI; the website is replete with social features and links to Facebook)

Kathleen Sebelius (Obama's Secretary of Health & Human Services since 2009 responsible for $678 million Obamacare implementation; made the decision to hire CGI Federal on a no-bid contract despite the evident conflict of interest with Michelle Obama and $47 million in Obama campaign donations by CGI; the website is replete with social features and links to Facebook)

Robin "Handsome Reward" Yangong Li (CEO, Baidu, Inc. (ADR); appointed Jan. 2004, the same month that Mark Zuckerberg obtained Leader Technologies' social networking source code to start Facebook; Robin Y. Li is very likely associated with John P. and James W. Breyer through their Chinese entities, including IDG Capital Partners, IDG-Accel and other variants; Li appointed a junior attorney from Fenwick & West LLP, Palo Alto/Mountain View, namely Parker Zhang, to be his "Head of Patents;" Fenwick & West LLP represented both Leader Technologies, Inc. and Accel Partners LLC in 2002-2003 and had Leader's source code in their files.)

Parker Zhang ("Head of Patents" at Baidu, Inc. (ADR), appointed in approx. May 2012; formerly a junior Associate attorney at Fenwick & West LLP; graduate from Michigan Law in 2005)

Rebecca M. Blank (Secretary, Department of Commerce; oversaw the dubious Leader v. Facebook activities of the Patent Office Director, David J. Kappos, who held over one million dollars in Facebook "dark pools" during the Leader v. Facebook proceedings; Kappos purchased this stock within weeks of his surprise recess appointment by President Obama; Kappos also was formerly employed by IBM, who sold Facebook 750 patents during the Leader v. Facebook proceedings; right before leaving the Patent OFfice, Kappos also ordered an unprecedented 3rd reexamination of Leader's patent without even identifying claims)

Mary L. Schapiro (Chairman, Securities & Exchange Commission; holds 51 Facebook "dark pools" stocks which held stock in Facebook, Baidu and more than a dozen Facebook crony companies; failed to regulate the "dark pools;" failed to disclose her substantial conflict of interest in regulating the run up to the Facebook IPO)

Robert C. Hancock (Chief Compliance Officer, Sands Capital Management, LLC; failed to file S.E.C. Form SC 12G notice of acquisition reports for Athenahealth, Baidu and Facebook during the period of the Facebook IPO in 2012; this conduct masked the conflicts of interest of Todd Y. Park, who was appointed by President Obama to be the U.S. Chief Technology Officer during this same period; Todd Y. Park is/has been founder, director and CEO of both Athenahealth and Castlight Health; Todd Y. Park deeply embedded the software from Athenahealth and Castlight Health into HealthCare.gov when he was CTO at Health & Human Services; none of these conflicts of interest were disclosed; Todd Y. Park's ethics pledges and reports are missing from the Office of Government Ethics)

Jonathan Goodman (Chief Counsel, Sands Capital Management, LLC; failed to file S.E.C. Form SC 12G notice of acquisition reports for Athenahealth, Baidu and Facebook during the period of the Facebook IPO in 2012; this conduct masked the conflicts of interest of Todd Y. Park, who was appointed by President Obama to be the U.S. Chief Technology Officer during this same period; Todd Y. Park is/has been founder, director and CEO of both Athenahealth and Castlight Health; Todd Y. Park deeply embedded the software from Athenahealth and Castlight Health into HealthCare.gov when he was CTO at Health & Human Services; none of these conflicts of interest were disclosed; Todd Y. Park's ethics pledges and reports are missing from the Office of Government Ethics; Goodman was formerly employed by Gibson Dunn LLP, Facebook appeals counsel in Leader v. Facebook)

Trip Adler ("Co-Founder" of Scribd; Harvard contemporaries of Mark Zuckerberg with a dubious orgins story, like Zuckerberg's; Scribd held AFI documents for two years, then summarily deleted the entire library without warning on Fri. Mar. 7, 2014; AFI's library contained only public documents and much evidence proving the Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption)

Jared Friedman ("Co-Founder" of Scribd; Harvard contemporaries of Mark Zuckerberg with a dubious orgins story, like Zuckerberg's; Scribd held AFI documents for two years, then summarily deleted the entire library without warning on Fri. Mar. 7, 2014; AFI's library contained only public documents and much evidence proving the Leader v. Facebook judicial corruption)

Jeffrey Wadsworth (CEO, Battelle Memorial Institute; President, Ohio State University Board of Trustees; former Deputy Director of Science & Technologies, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California Board of Trustees)

Michael V. Drake (President, The Ohio State University; former Chancellor, University of California, Irvine)

Joseph A. Steinmetz (Provost, The Ohio State University; author of Psychological Science article on MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) that triggered the discovery of massive double-dealing and fraud within the Ohio State trustees)

Research Tip:Type any name or subject in the Google search at the top of this webpage. That will show you any relevant links within the sites that we have been following and investigating in the Leader v. Facebook case. Vigilance everyone! Our American Republic is at risk.

HOW TO FILE A FRAUD COMPLAINT AGAINST A UNIVERSITY

The following universities were announced as participants in Ohio State Provost Joseph A. Steinmetz's corrupt MOOC education initiative named "University Innovation Alliance" (UIA). We have identified the instructions and online forms you need to file a complaint with the participants. MOOC stands for "Massive Open Online Course."

You should complain about:

(1) the intellectual property theft of social networking source code from Leader Technologies, Columbus, Ohio that is the software engine running the UIA;

(2) the corruption at Ohio State University and OSU's collusion with Battelle Memorial Institute which helped steal the software being used by UIA; and

(3) the mistreatement of OSU Marching Band Director Jon Waters regarding fabricated Title IX charges that were used to pave the way for Steinmetz to announce UIA.

Universities pride themselves on protection of intellectual property.

Therefore, these universities cannot participate in this abuse of inventor copyrights, patents and trade secrets by The Ohio State Trustees and Administration. If these universities participate knowingly with Ohio State in its theft of intellectual property, then they are aiding and abetting the theft of intellectual property on a "massive" scale... Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) also known as The Eclipse Foundation.