I propose that every player is allowed to pick a second companion, but it cannot be the same type as the first. In regards to rule 28 let’s just say that there’s a separate roll for each companion. Furthermore, I propose a buff to an existing companion along with 2 new choices for a companion.

September 2014 Member of the Month
December 2014 Member of the Month
ERBoH.com's 2014 Artist of the Year
ERBoH.com's 2014 Member of the Year
February 2016 Member of the Month
ERBoH.com's 2016 Staff Member of the Year
ERBoH.com's 2016 Chatter of the Year
ERBoH.com's 2016 Most Active User of the Year
ERBoH.com's 2016 Best Meme of the Year (SEX PONIES)
ERBoH.com's 2016 Best REWF of the Year (Juiz vs Helioptle)
ERBoH.com's 2016 Spammer of the Year
ERBoH.com's 2016 Best Username of the Year (Hugh Mungus)

le epic maymays xdd:

Spoiler:

Originally Posted by Rocket

Is Juiz darth vader? i hope so because that means he gets to be a dad

Originally Posted by Dion

This isn't the first time Juiz has given Sane a forced analysis pounding and it won't be the last.

Originally Posted by Samilton

juiz is a revolutionary

Originally Posted by Dion

get cancer

Originally Posted by Samilton

They're called Japanese people, Juiz

Originally Posted by Gika

The fiirst rule of ERBOH.com is: You do not tell Juiz what to do.
The second rule of ERBOH.com is: You DO NOT tell Juiz what to do.

Originally Posted by Sans

do you have a moment to hear about our lord and savior juizus

Originally Posted by Rocket

sorry polar, im a moderator of the people

and the people say you suck

Originally Posted by sane

"Don't be such a pussy Sam." shouted Juiz, the big, strong, captivating godly man that he was.

Originally Posted by YellowNerd

I love juiz more than his girlfriend does

Originally Posted by sane

My name is Sane, and this is my buddy Juiz, we're kind of a big deal and we can kick a lot of ass and love Wonderwall.

Originally Posted by sane

this forum is dead and I am the necrophiliac who will fuck it back to life

Originally Posted by Brad

Juiz, you are truly the Shakespeare of our time. I laughed. I cried. I gave up red meat. Thank you, you beautiful bright ray of freedom in this otherwise fascist community. Thank you.

Log's proposal:
Make the following changes to rule 22:
Change the following sentence:Every player is allowed to pick one companion, which grants them special abilities.
to:Every player is allowed to pick two companions, which grant them special abilities.
Change the following sentence (In google doc attached to the rule, in Dali's Clock's description:-If this companion’s first ability is used, the user will have to wait at least three turn cycles before using it again.
to:-If this companion’s first ability is used, the user will have to wait at least one turn cycle before using it again.
Append the following to the google doc attached to the rule:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...5LpvPsOMM/edit
Voting ends on 11:30 AM, 2019-08-17 PL time.

WARNING! The proposal differs from your intention a bit.
Your intention is to allow the player to attack both companion under the conditions specified in the rule 28. That would require changing the rule 28, as it specifically talks about attacking a "player's companion", in singular. As currently, the rules don't allow for changing two rules in one proposal, that little aspect of your proposal was discarded.

---

OK, game time.

Since none of you have given me a reason for voting nay against my vote, allow me to take the initiative and defend my proposal:

What my proposal does is essentially change the rule from "give 3 extra points to the last player" to "give 3 extra points to the last active player".

Spars the rule was originally proposed by you. Did you want it to sink points into a player that isn't really interested in the game, or did you want it to become a catch-up mechanic for people who are actually playing the game but need that little extra boost?

Juiz, not only did you express your desire for inactive players to be stripped of passive benefits (and well, this rule is the first step), you also are the last active player. This rule serves you on both an ideological and a pragmatic level.

Log, I'll admit. If I were in the lead (like you are right now), I would not want people catching up to me. I really wouldn't. So, I actually understand you. Now, you need to understand me. My vote has a little bit of power. I vote against your proposal, which puts it in a rather precarious position right now. If you change your vote on my proposal, and my proposal passes, I will change mine. The ball is in your court.

Well there’s personal benefit and also not feeling a strong need to vote for it on general principle but bitch fine, aye. (Leveraging your vote on it *passing* just gives Juiz another reason not to vote for yours but whatever).