I think it is valid question, maybe 50 is too much but the idea is to backup the connection list, so you can quickly set it up if your virt manager software got corrupted and you dont want it to be VM.

Okay no one has 50 hosts, but maybe 10 or more or so. who cares it, I label it valid .Court Adjourned

When you have more than just a few hosts, even spread out across multiple sites, managing them with virt-manager can be painful. You definitely should start looking at something a bit more scalable, like RHV/oVirt

When you have more than just a few hosts, even spread out across multiple sites, managing them with virt-manager can be painful. You definitely should start looking at something a bit more scalable, like RHV/oVirt

@FATeknollogee if you have an ovirt-engine somewhere central, that can reach to all the other locations, you can create a datacentre per location and place standalone hosts in there, using local storage. You will still have a single pane of glass to manage it all from a single address, a centralized VM configuration store, and the option to scale to additional sites or add hosts in a specific DC. I've run a RHV setup with ~300 hosts spread out across the world like this, and it was much easier than dealing with entirely standalone machines.