Why the White House banning a CNN reporter actually matters

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins did her job, and then got punished by the White House for it. The aggressive retaliation by government officials drew outrage from journalists, rival networks, and the White House Correspondents Association.

Collins, serving at the television pool reporter at an Oval Office photo opportunity on Wednesday, called out questions to President Trump about his former lawyer’s taping of conversations and Vladimir Putin’s failure to accept an invitation to Washington. This is common practice among White House reporters. Trump declined to answer the questions, which is his right. But then things took a turn, as Collins says she was called before Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and newly appointed deputy chief of staff Bill Shine and told that she would not be allowed to attend an open press event in the Rose Garden later in the day.

The response from fellow journalists was swift. New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker called the decision “outrageous,” adding, “A strong leader does not fear questions. A strong democracy does not shield its leader from those who question authority.” Fox News anchor Bret Baier also stood up for his network’s rival, saying, “As a member of the White House press pool, Fox stands firmly with CNN on this issue of access.” Meanwhile, the White House Correspondents Association issued a statement strongly condemning the decision. “This type of action is inappropriate, wrong-headed, and weak,” wrote WHCA President Olivier Knox. “It cannot stand.”

Apparently, the White House has decided that singling out CNN won’t hurt them. On President Trump’s recent European trip, he attacked CNN unprompted at a press conference in the UK, refused to answer a question from the network’s Jim Acosta, and pivoted to Fox News’s John Roberts, saying, “Let’s go to a real network.” The White House later pulled national security advisor John Bolton from a scheduled appearance on CNN as retaliation for what it said was “bad behavior.”

The full-throated response on Wednesday comes as solidarity among those covering the president has been on the rise. After receiving criticism for not backing Acosta at that UK press conference, Roberts issued a defense of the outlets that Trump had disparaged. Then, at a press briefing last week, Hill reporter Jordan Fabian yielded the floor to NBC’s Hallie Jackson when Sarah Sanders tried to brush past one of Jackson’s follow-up questions.

The outrage from journalists to Collins’s banning was palpable, but in order to have an impact they must also make it clear to the public why this story matters beyond the understandable anger and frustration from CNN. After all, the White House allowed CNN cameras and other network reporters to cover Trump’s afternoon event, so is this dust-up really all that important? The real reason why this is significant is that Trump’s constant attacks on the press—so regular that they barely register anymore—have now been backed by concrete action from his minions. As with any number of individual incidents involving this administration and the media, the specific action won’t hasten the end of the free press as we know it, but the sum of Trump’s deliberate attempts to undermine trust in journalism has long-lasting consequences.

Below, more on the reactions to the White House’s decision on Collins.

Support from the competition: Fox News President Jay Wallace issued a statement saying, “We stand in strong solidarity with CNN for the right to full access for our journalists as part of a free and unfettered press.” The support from Fox is especially notable not just because of its rivalry with CNN, but also because Shine was a longtime executive at the network until he was ousted last year over his handling of sexual harassment allegations.

Play-by-play: CNN’s Brian Stelter has an overview of the entire incident, noting that “other reporters who were in the room said Collins was perfectly respectful” during her questioning of Trump.

“Inexcusable”: NBC’s Hallie Jackson responded to the White House’s action with a strong message. “Let’s be clear: it is inexcusable, unacceptable, and sets an extremely dangerous precedent,” she wrote.” “We shout questions at the president regularly. It’s called: doing our job.”

Changing the channel: White House events aren’t the only place that Trump wants to avoid CNN. The New York Times’s Katie Rogers and Maggie Haberman report that the president was furious that Melania Trump’s television aboard Air Force One was tuned to CNN on their recent foreign trip.

Facebook’s stock dropped by as much as 24 percent in after-hours trading on Wednesday after the tech giant reported slowed revenue growth and said it would “focus on privacy” going forward. The company’s stock price has rebounded a bit this morning, but is still down more than 20 percent, demonstrating that the fallout from the Cambridge Analytica scandal and other privacy issues have far-reaching implications for the company. CNN’s Seth Fiegerman notes that, “even as they predicted slowing sales growth, Facebook executives cited a new figure to remind investors of its massive audience: 2.5 billion people used at least one of Facebook’s apps (which include Instagram, WhatsApp and Facebook) last month.”

“The internet may not have helped elect Donald Trump after all,” writes Slate’s Will Oremus. Citing a study from from economists at Brown and Stanford, Oremus writes that Trump did better than his predecessors among the demographic groups least likely to be online, and actually underperformed Mitt Romney and John McCain among internet users and people who got campaign news online.

A new Pew study finds that moderate lawmakers are more likely to post about local issues on Facebook than their more partisan colleagues. Additionally, the study’s authors Patrick van Kessel and Adam Hughes write that “posts about local issues tended to receive less online engagement compared with posts that expressed political support or opposition.”

For CJR, Politifact founder Bill Adair thinks that it’s time to move beyond the site’s iconic Truth-O-Meter. “I think the Truth-O-Meter’s ratings (which now range from True to Pants on Fire) are still effective for many readers,” Adair writes. “But I have come to realize that in our polarized environment, the meter I invented is not reaching everyone, and not reaching conservatives in particular.”

Vanity Fair’s Joe Pompeo writes that Michael Barbaro, the 38-year-old host of The New York Times’s The Daily, is “quickly becoming the Ira Glass of his generation.” The Daily, Pompeo reports, draws 5 million listeners a month at the latest count, more than 1 million of whom tune in every day, and has become a cornerstone of the Times’s new media strategy.

Boston Globe owner John Henry tells WGBH’s Dan Kennedy that despite persistent rumors to the contrary, he has no interest in selling the paper. “We have had no discussions about selling nor is anything contemplated. I don’t think of selling any local assets during my lifetime,” Henry says. At the same time, he admits frustration that the Globe continually fails to meet its budgets on both the revenue and expense sides. “I am not going to continue that,” Henry adds. “This has always been about sustainability rather than sizable, endless, annual losses.”

WBUR named Meghna Chakrabarti And David Folkenflik co-hosts of On Point, one of its flagship shows. Chakrabarti, who has worked for Here & Now and the podcast Modern Love, will host four days a week, while Folkenflik, NPR’s longtime media correspondent, will host Fridays.

Featured

The day after he captured Brazil’s presidency in a run-off, Jair Bolsonaro spoke with Globo News, Brazil's largest television network. Bolsonaro, dressed casually in a light blue polo shirt and dark blue jacket, opened the October 29 interview by citing...