Analysis of the good, bad, and embarrassing movies from my personal collection.

Friday, October 2, 2015

"Sicario" Is the Dark, Tense Film the Drug War Deserves.

Sicario

Director Dennis Villeneuve has recently established himself
as a master of tension, mood, and atmosphere. His two most recent films, Prisoners and Enemy set the tone for what to expect from his latest film, Sicario. Villeneuve’s ability to take
basic establishing shots of arguably mundane settings and make them foreboding
and intense is impressive. It’s a way of creating an effective style without
calling too much attention to itself.

With Sicario,
Villeneuve has the deserts of Mexico and the American southwest to play with.
Lengthy establishing shots (renowned director of photography Roger Deakins
impresses yet again) paired with a menacing score (by Johann Johannsson) let us
know that this film about the drug war is going to be dark, intense, and
disturbing. Mood isn’t everything in a film, but it certainly helps draw the
viewer in. Working with a script from Taylor Sheridan (best known as an actor
from Sons of Anarchy), Villeneuve is
able to take what could have been a cookie-cutter action-thriller and make it
into something special.

A movie about the drug war needs to be elevated because this
is a story that has been told before, in a way. There have been movies about
the drug war in Mexico for decades, but Sicario
rises above the rest thanks to Villeneuve’s direction. That is not to say
Sheridan’s script is weak. It is not terribly original, but it is interesting
thanks to the perspective Sheridan chose.

The story is told from FBI agent Kate Macer’s perspective.
Macer (Emily Blunt) is asked to join a joint task force made up of vague
government types including Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro. Neither one wants
to tell Macer much, so we do not know much. The most Macer, and the audience,
is told is that the mission is to shake things up for the cartel and “dramatically
overreact.” There is more to it, of course, which is the mystery of the film.
The title itself is a bit of a mystery as “sicario” means “hitman” in Spanish,
but we are not told who the hitman is. Having the main character be the new member
of a group is a standard ploy of screenwriting to give the viewer someone to
empathize with, but it is interesting here when you consider that Macer may
represent the typical American’s reaction to the drug war. Not to get into
spoilers, but Macer’s story arc is much more powerful when you view her as a representation
of America in general.

While the character of Macer may be a bit plain, Blunt is
still able to show her impressive range. Even though she plays a successful FBI
agent, this is not your typical strong independent female role. Normally, a
female character like this would be shown overpowering every man in her way,
but Sicario takes a more realistic
route. Macer can hold her own in a raid, but in a hand to hand fight with a man
who has fifty pounds on her, things do not go so smoothly. While Macer is physically
capable of her job, she struggles with the moral implications of her work with
the task force. It is a role that requires Blunt to show equal parts strength
and weakness, and she is great at both.

Brolin gives a fun performance in his supporting role,
providing some much needed comedic relief to an otherwise joyless film. But it’s
Del Toro who steals the film. As Alejandro, a mysterious and deadly soldier, he
is able to make a menacing character surprisingly sympathetic. Del Toro comes
across as the true star of the film. And Macer (and we the audience) are just
there to watch him work.

Since this is a film about the drug war, there is a bit of action,
as well. Villneuve does not glorify any of the violence, instead making most of
the action scenes quick and brutal, showcasing how savage the situation has
become. Each “action” scene is an incredibly tense moment that is much more
effective than anything you will find in traditional action films of late.

Every positive element of the film is amplified by the style
Villeneuve infuses into the film. Perhaps this is giving him too much credit,
but mood and atmosphere cannot be undervalued when it comes to films about
serious topics. Villeneuve’s style demands your close attention. And your close
attention is rewarded with a tense, atmospheric “action” film that will have
you contemplating a real world issue. In short, Sicario is what every serious film should be.

Sicario receives a:

Random Thoughts (SPOILERS)

I really liked the dark ending of the film, with the whole mission being about supporting one cartel to take over the entire drug trade. It's hard to fault Brolin's reasoning, especially when he points out the impossibility of getting Americans to stop using drugs. It's not a nice solution, but maybe it's a realistic one.

I liked Sicario quite a bit because of my interpretation of Macer's character. By the end of the film, I saw her as representative of America in general because of her inability to bring real change to the situation. When Alejandro visits her at the end to coerce a signature that will legalize all the illegal things they did, he tells her she isn't strong enough for the war. She is not a wolf. So she should move away from it. I feel like that sums up most of America's citizens in regard to the drug war. Most people can't handle the brutality of what's going on, but their drug use or lack of attention allows it to continue. We are not wolves, so rather than do something about it, we "move" out attention elsewhere, hoping someone else fixes it. This interpretation was solidified for me when Macer retrieved her gun, aimed it at Alejandro, but was not able to pull the trigger. She was left on the balcony, powerless. That symbolizes the typical American regarding the drug war. We're above it on the balcony in America, and we have the power to stop it, but we can't pull the trigger. I really wish the film had ended there, rather than ending up at the kids' soccer game in Juarez. The ending makes a powerful point (that was also made in Traffic, by the way), but the theme of the film would have been more evident if the film had ended with Alejandro walking away as a powerless Macer stands, defeated, on the balcony.

After watching this, it is clear why Villeneuve is directing the next Blade Runner. This film is actually quite similar, stylistically. Blade Runner featured lengthy establishing shots set to a unique score that solidified the mood and atmosphere of the film constantly. I am not officially excited for what I previously thought of as a needless sequel. I know Villeneuve will keep the new Blade Runner just as dark as the original.

Finally, hats off to Sicario for that brutal dinner scene at the end. For a second, I thought Alejandro would prove to be sympathetic to the innocent woman and children at the table, but he turned out to be just as brutal as he had been the entire film. He was truly a man on a mission. I have not found Del Toro this interesting in years. Hopefully he keeps this up with his role in the next Star Wars film.