By all accounts, more money will be invested into renewables in 2014 than was invested in 2013. Our experts lay out where, why, when and how.

This article is part of our Renewable Energy World January/February Annual Outlook Issue for 2014, which will be published on February 10, 2014. The issue includes our Global Directory of Suppliers. If you are not already a subscriber, CLICK HERE to subscribe now!

Umanoff summed it up nicely, “as you go around the world: Latin America, parts of Asia, the Middle East are very attractive markets for renewable energy growth [in 2014].”

In the U.S., the story might be slightly different. Umanoff predicted explosive growth in the distributed solar industry as more customers see the financial benefits of putting solar panels on their roofs or in ground-mounted arrays close to their commercial facilities. He also pointed to incidents in the past where large industrial power users were without power for extended periods as drivers for renewable energy adoption, particularly in the form of micro-grids. “Industrial consumers who, on the heels of hurricane sandy were out of power for 4-5 days, they take a look,” he said.

In addition, in 2014, expect to see more solar installation companies tap into the burgeoning innovations in how to offer their customers low-cost financing options or attractive leasing models to help offset the cost of going solar. (More on financial innovations in the section below.)

The U.S. wind market will flourish in 2014 as companies work steadily to complete construction on projects they began in late 2013 (wind project developers had to start construction by the end of 2013 in order to take advantage of the Production Tax Credit (PTC)). But since the PTC officially expired in 2013, don’t expect to hear about too many new wind power projects being commissioned in 2014 and beyond. Umanoff predicted that the U.S. will install upwards of 9 GW of wind power in 2014 and even more in 2015 as companies build out their planned projects.

Most experts agree that other renewable energy technologies will hold steady in 2014. Geothermal will continue to make progress in areas with good resourced such as the Philippines. “Large hydro continues to be very attractive but mainly in developing economies and new markets,” said Umanoff. “It’s very, very hard to permit a large hydropower facility in a mature, industrial democracy,” he said. Biofuels and biomass projects will make headway as well but in terms of gaining marketshare, the winners will be wind and solar.

Optimism Dominates the Investment Space

While investors will give many concrete reasons that they chose to invest in a technology, project or a company, one very important reason often overlooked and difficult to quantify is consumer sentiment. In others words, investors usually have positive or negative feelings about technologies, industries or companies and invest accordingly, whether they are aware of their emotional assessment of it or not.

Navigant consulting has been examining consumer attitudes towards clean energy since 2009 and published its latest report “Energy and Environment Consumer Survey” in December 2013. The report is a summary of a survey conducted among 1,084 U.S. adults based on a “nationally representative and demographically balanced sample.” The survey asked for consumer attitudes towards 10 clean energy topics and the results are shown in the chart below.

Overall consumer sentiment toward solar and wind energy was up significantly in 2013 over 2012, indicating that in general, U.S. residents feel positive about clean energy. And when investors are looking for investment opportunities, it follows that they put their money into technologies, products, services and companies that they feel good about.

Perhaps that’s why all of the finance experts that we spoke to for this article said they were “optimistic” about the 2014 outlook for renewable energy finance.

“I remain optimistic that renewable energy investments will continue to gain ground in 2014,” said OPIC’s Tabernacki. “I think, without question, more money will be invested into renewable energy in 2014 than was in 2013,” said Akin Gump’s Umanoff. “I’m more optimistic than ever about the health of the clean-tech space,” stated Dallas Kachan. “I think that overall, we’re going to have a really good year,” said Tom Konrad, a private money manager who writes about clean energy investing.

Konrad believes that 2014 will be a great year for renewable energy finance, he said. He said that we saw the beginning of it in 2013 with the securitization of a bond by Solar City and pointed to Hannon Armstrong’s securitization of an energy efficiency bond in late December 2013 as another indicator that renewable energy financing is on track to take off in 2014.

“I think that we will see a few publicly traded ‘yield cos’ (yield companies) in solar listed in 2014,” he said. A yield co is a publicly traded company that is oriented towards income as opposed to growth. This type of investment opportunity is a major switch, said Konrad. “Any stock you have ever written about pretty much has been a growth stock,” he explained. “Tesla is a growth stock. People buy Tesla because they think they are going to keep on gaining market share,” he clarified.

“Now there are some new income stocks that came public last year: Hannon Armstrong, Pattern Energy Holdings, NRG Yield and Brookfield Renewable Energy, so there are four, I would say, renewable energy income stocks on U.S. exchanges.”

Further, Konrad expects to see at least one renewable energy income mutual fund unveiled in 2014 “because there are lots of things to put into it,” he said.

It makes perfect sense. Once renewable energy assets are operating efficiently, they generate payback for their investors. Now that the technology has matured enough to gain the trust of some of the more reticent, risk-averse investors like corporations and banks, expect to see lower cost of capital for projects and greater interest in renewable energy stocks, bonds and mutual funds.

Other newer financial innovations will expand in 2014, said Dallas Kachan, pointing specifically to crowdfunding. “When the equity-based crowdfunding systems start taking hold, that really stands a chance of unlocking large sums of hitherto unavailable capital for the whole cleantech space,” he said. Solar Mosaic, for example, which launched in officially in August of 2011 gained a lot of visibility in 2013. The company allows individuals to invest in solar projects and offers attractive returns to investors.

Kachan expects to see more innovative funding opportunities like Mosaic in 2014. “You will also see new systems, new initiatives targeted at the space, many of which, for the first time offer investors the chance to make money at making small investments in projects or innovation,” he said. Kachan cautions that he has some reservations about the long-term viability of equity-based crowdfunding – he worries what will happen when investors lose money, which undoubtedly will occur at some point. “I think it’s not going to take too many of those squeezes, those so-called down-rounds, and the requirements for pro rata investment. These things are going to potentially bite investors and it might turn off people from equity-based crowdfunding,” he explained. But nonetheless, he’s certain that we will see lots more in the financial innovation space in 2014. “That said, some people will make some money in doing this [equity-based crowdfunding] and that will encourage others to start doing this.”

Konrad agrees that financial innovation in renewable energy is probably going to be THE story of 2014. Ever the mathematician, Konrad guesses that about 60-75 percent of renewable energy investment will be driven by financial innovation, with the remainder being driven by policy, which he also feels will be favorable, at least on the state level, in 2014.

“I see 2014 as the year that renewable energy finance comes of age,” said Konrad.

It's reassuring to hear - if only from a drunk - that goverments are cutting-back on subsidies for so called "wind energy" schemes. Maybe they are beginning to realize that they are in fact, probably the largest "white elephant" - pink Rhinocerus ? - Ever !!.
Their salesmen tell you that they return 3, or 4 times their cost in the first year ??!. They do - tell me this.
Yet from a public meeting ( Llandeilo, Wales Aug. 2005) I learn the truth, viz:
Cost of proposed farm ,..... 153M
expected income from it ---- 000.2M p.a.

These figures tally well with the fact that a sensible wind Turbine-Altenator system will return
around 50 times this. About what might be achieved from forestry, done proerly, that is.
I am not "splitting hairs" here, or comparing "percents". I am talking "different ballhames", like being in the wrong country, sort of thing. Current - or maybe "hass-been" - "wind technology" , is so far removed from what actually brings home the bacon, it really is hard for me, at least, to believe that anyone involved in it actually went to school at any stage. The old ones in the early American mid west ?, Had to do this. They had neither "subsidy", nor "breaks". They might have needed brake !!, but that's all.

Our fossils and nuclear captive govs give 10 times the breaks wind gets to fossils and nukes, and keep cutting wind and solar breaks, wiping out the wind businesses every few years.

Offshore and rural wind can supply some 5 times the total electrical needs of the country (and the world). 80% of our electric is consumed within 100 miles of the coasts. Add rooftop and parking lot solar, and back it up with waste to fuels and hydro and you have a complete, cheaper, forever energy system.

Wind is only economical with large turbines, and small turbines kill more birds and bats per KWH.

ANONYMOUS
January 31, 2014

But still I am no nearer to discovering where "companies bizily investing in their wind projects from years ago..." get the money !!
At less than ONE percent of cost returned, p.a. it can't be from the wind, can it ? Maybe this form of supply is in the "sustainable" category. So long as there is plenty of money being printed, from the few remaining trees, and no shortage of energy from "conventional sources" (excluding the Sun, of course, we don't own that) , then fun and. games can be "sustained".
By the way, a sensible design of wind energy system will return "guilt edged" percentage levels of its cost, annually. Such systems, appart from many other differences, .must have diameters lying in the range of from about half, to 2 metre, diameter, because the turbine and the alternator exhibit opposite "ecconomy of size". The lowest cost per watt is therefore with sizes where the T costs about the same as the A.
http://s36.a2zinc.net/clients/pennwell/rewna2013/Public/Calendar.aspx?SuperTrackId=&TrackId=&AssociationId=&DateId=&FormatId=&DurationId=&SpeakerId=&SessionTypeId=?ExpoId=&Keyword=&&SearchEvent=&View=Calendar_summary

With over 52,000 subscribers and a global readership in 174 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine covers industry, policy, technology, finance and markets for all renewable technologies. Content is aimed decision makers...