National Bolshevism

Worldwide National Bolshevik Movement
NATIONAL-BOLSCHEWISMUS
Национал-большевизм
ΕΘΝΙΚΟ – ΜΠΟΛΣΕΒΙΚΙΚΗ
For national freedom from the power of the international banks!!!

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

"The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market ... drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must itself constitute the nation, it is in so far, national,though not in the bourgeois sense of the word." Karl Marx

Monday, May 12, 2014

What most people,
including socialists and communists, SIMPLY DON’T KNOW...

· Where do commercial banks get the money to lend you, your family,
businesses or national governments? No, not from savings accounts or
other reserves – but, quite literally, from
nothing. They create the money they lend simply by keying figures into a
deposit account. It is this fictitious
electronic money, created from thin air, that they then count as an ‘asset’
on their books – but also demand be paid ‘back’ by the borrower – with
interest. To top it all they have total freedom to make a lot more money by
selling loans they make on the financial markets. So when an individual,
a business - or a government - takes a loan from a commercial bank, they
are giving it free licence to create that money for itself – but then paying that bank the same amount of money to
do so! Banks literally lend money into
existence – principally for themselves.Long ago commercial banks were prohibited by law from printing
their own paper notes. But technology has changed, and with it the means of production of money. The result
is that banks can once again effectively ‘print’ their own money in another way
– by creating it electronically and as digital money. As a result, 97% of all money in circulation does not consist of notes and coins
that are printed or minted by governments but is money created by
commercial banks – as debt. That
means commercial banks have an almost complete monopoly on the money supply of nations. It also means
that all capitalist economies are now debt-based and debt-fuelled. For if all
debt were paid back there would be no money in the economy. Yet national governments, banks and
treasuries have for a long time been banned
by international agreement from creating their own money in the same way that commercial banks do all the time. The issue of paper currencies such as Greenbacks as debt-
and interest-free money that began even before the American Civil War - to be used for investment in public spending and the
real economy - was the real cause of the war of Independence, in which King
George was backed by the bankers. And all governments that have since
sought to overturn the monopoly of banks – in particular the big international
banks – on the supply of money, have been sanctioned, trade-embargoed or
targeted for ‘regime change’.

2. The
BIG LIE swallowed by The Left

Most people – including
Labourites and those on the Left, still swallow the BIG LIE that governments are dependent
on either taxation or borrowing from the big international
banks to fund public spending, and that therefore the only area of choice
governments and political parties have therefore, is between either
implementing or arguing for more or less ‘austerity’ (to bring down the national
debt) or else for greater or lesser tax increases or reductions. The idea of
‘sovereign money’ - independent, national and state money-creation - does not
even occur to them and is never so much as mentioned in the media or
parliament. Those who advocate ‘socialism’ as the solution however, still think
principally in terms of the traditional aim of renationalising key industries, public utilities and services.
What they do not realise – and why they have lost credibility - is that this is
actually quite impossible without renationalising
money and money creation. Then again the traditional Marxist expectation
that capitalism would collapse through a falling rate of profit, unemployment
and wage stagnation is completely
out-dated. For finance capitalism in its new form came up with an answer to
this ages ago – by getting workers to use credit cards and ‘pay-day loans’ to borrow the money they couldn’t earn as
low-paid wage-slaves and become debt-slaves
as well - and by forcing governments to borrow from the banks too.

3. Why the Left – including the socialist and even communist Left
– has lost credibility

Because it has failed to keep
up with the times and the changing nature of capitalism it has made itself an
easy target for the Thatcherist-Reaganite claim that There isNo
Alternative - offering as it does no clear counter-argument to
the ‘false-flag’ issue of ‘national debt’ – which is solely a result of the
international finance capitalism and not
‘over-spending on the part of national governments. Marx long ago
recognised the predatory and parasitic
nature of unproductive, credit- and debt-fuelled finance capital - what he
called “usury capital”. As Michael Hudson writes: “Marx expected the
Industrial Revolution’s upsweep to be strong enough to replace this system with
one of productive credit, yet he certainly had no blind spot for financial
parasitism. “Both usury and commerce exploit the various modes of production,”
he wrote. “They do not create it, but attack it from the outside.” “Usury
centralises money wealth,” Marx elaborated. “It does not alter the mode of
production, but attaches itself to it as a parasite and makes it miserable. It
sucks its blood, kills its nerve, and compels reproduction to proceed under
even more disheartening conditions … usurer’s capital does not confront the
labourer as industrial capital,” but “impoverishes this mode of production,
paralyzes the productive forces instead of developing them.” Yet neither Marx,
Engels nor Lenin could possibly have anticipated how what Marx called “fictitious
money” would – through the digital era
and as electronic money – become the
principal form both of money and a means of unprecedented wealth expropriation through debt.

“Engels noted that Marx
would have emphasized how finance remained largely predatory had he lived to
see France’s Second Empire and its “world-redeeming credit-phantasies” explode
in “a swindle of a magnitude never witnessed before.” But more than any other
writer of his century, Marx described how periodic financial crises were caused
by the tendency of debts to grow exponentially, without regard for growth in
productive powers. This self-expanding growth of financial claims, Marx wrote,
consists of “imaginary” and “fictitious” capital inasmuch as it cannot be
realized over time. When fictitious financial gains are obliged to confront the
impossibility of paying off the exponential growth in debt claims – that is,
when scheduled debt service exceeds the ability to pay – breaks in the chain of
payments cause crises. “The greater portion of the banking capital is,
therefore, purely fictitious and consists of certificates of indebtedness … A
point arrives at which bankers and investors recognize that no society’s
productive powers can long support the growth of interest-bearing debt at
compound rates. Seeing that the pretense must end, they call in their loans and
foreclose on the property of debtors, forcing the sale of property under crisis
conditions as the financial system collapses in a convulsion of bankruptcy.”

4. What even ‘hard-line’ communists or supposed ‘Marxists’ fail
to see...

Global finance capitalism and
other form of ‘rentier capitalism’ - in which profit takes the principal form
of income received as interest, rent, bonds and other financial instruments is
fast transforming itself into a new form of neo-feudalism based on debt-slavery.
In this neo-feudal ‘world order’, there quite simply is no longer a national ‘ruling class’ either - just a
parasitic sub-class of non-productive rentiers and bankers – themselves puppets of an international financial or ‘rentier’ elite (that far-less-than 1% who own most of the world’s wealth). In those countries
where a national ruling class of productive industrial capitalists does still
exist to some extent, the ruling international financial elite works constantly
to overpower it – for example through the exercise of international money power
(World Bank and IMF) as well as through political destabilisation or outright
war. The only empire in the world
today is ‘The Empire of Money’ – which has no respect for any ethnic,
cultural or spiritual traditions, though it is happy to pit them against
one another. Imperialist states such as the U.S. are just the
military-political instruments deployed by The
Empire of Money and its masters –
the global financial elite represented by the
Bilderberg Group. Political independence – for example in Greece, Russia or Scotland - is a necessary precondition for monetary
independence (i.e. sovereign money creation) but is meaningless without this monetary independence. The
Republic of Ireland was the proof of the pudding – for without monetary independence its historically
hard-earned national independence proved no political defence against the power
of predatory international finance capitalism. And Scotland, if it wins
political independence, may bask in and even benefit from this for a while –
but without monetary independence
from the international banks, this national ‘independence’ will eventually prove illusory.

5. The Gaping Black Hole in Political and Economic Thinking

Throughout Europe and the
world, people are groaning under the
weight of financially imposed austerity measures and resulting,unemployment,
impoverishment, joblessness and debt – unable to afford even food and medicine,
or to get or do anything with their skills and education. As a result, hundreds of thousands regularly take to
the streets to vent their rage in countries such Italy, Spain and Greece. Yes,
they could and should cancel their debts to international banks. But then what?
The gaping hole that even in these
countries you will not find a single political party or movement -
of either the Left or Right, far-Left or far-Right - with a policy that
recognises that the only solution to national and global poverty
and immiseration is the renationalisation of money and money creation.This was the solution that Lincoln
first came up with – so no surprise he was assassinated!

6. Falling Prey to the old Ploy - Divide and Rule

Greeks blaming Germans,
neo-Nazis blaming immigrants or Islam, UKIP and others blaming the EU – and none of them have a clue! This applies
even to ‘communist’ parties across the globe, who still think industrial
corporations rule the world - when in reality they are just ‘cash cows’ for
predatory finance capitalism – why else would up to 40% of the price of
manufactured goods just go to paying off interest to the banks or keeping
speculative financial shareholders happy? It is these same ‘communists’ who
still think in terms of a parochial
class war between a national ‘working class’ or ‘proletariat’ and a national
‘ruling class’ or ‘bourgeoisie’, i.e. who simply do not see that what is happening is the rise of a national underclass (working or not-working) in all countries and
an internationalruling class of bankers and financiers
on the other – with ever less and less classes and strata of society in
between.

7. Lessons from History

A comparable state of affairs
that history offers us was the creation of a vast national underclass in
Germany following the massive financial burden placed on Germany by the
Versailles Treaty. Two boxers came out into the ring to slug it out – the
German Communists in one corner and Hitler and his ‘National Socialists’ in the
other. Both knew a thing or two. The Communists blamed the capitalist system.
Fair enough. But you can’t tangibly see
an economic ‘system’ in the same way you can see an orthodox Jew (or a Pakistani Muslim) on your street - or
know that a family in your block of flats, religious or not, is Jewish or are
immigrants. Nice ‘Right hook’ from Adolf - bringing a first point on his score
card - and that of the racist, anti-immigrant or anti-Islamic far-right
movements of today. The Communists also knew from Lenin that finance capitalism
had a big part to play in the current capitalist came. Too true. But then
another hefty ‘Right hook’ from Adolf – focussing on the international nature of finance capitalism and identifying its
machinations with a global Jewish
conspiracy. The Communists of course, didn’t go along with the anti-Semitic
line (recognising as they did that “anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools”)
but nor did they sufficiently
emphasise the national nature of the
German people’s struggle and the international
nature of their enemy. How could they, given that Hitler could score yet
another point by identifying all Communists and Marxists with the ‘traitors’
who paved the way for Versailles – the latter having seeing this war simply as
an ‘imperialist war’ when in reality it was a war waged by English finance capitalism against the threatening power of German industrial capitalism -
industrial capitalism having been long on the wane in England itself. Once in
power of course, Hitler himself would eventually avail himself of American
banks and bankers and financiers – including those from whose family Messrs.
Bush Senior and Junior hail. But before that Hitler had also used a form of national,
state-issued money to rebuild the economy - with such success that whilst
Britain and America were suffering ‘The Great Depression’, the German economy
was booming (and that despite a complete trade embargo being imposed on Germany
as punishment by the international bankers for such an act of national financial insolence). Nor did
the Communists acknowledge that the
Kaiser himself had granted German workers more rights and benefits than
in England or any other capitalist economy. Thatcher was renowned for seeing
England as a ‘nation of shopkeepers’. Well, that’s exactly how the Kaiser and
many other Germans saw England before WW1 – as a country of purely
self-interested and utilitarian traders, wheelers and dealers – lacking all
depth of soul and richness of culture. So the war was seen as a war ‘for
culture’ and against a particularly soul-less Englishform of capitalism - of the sort that
Margaret Thatcher would later become the chief ideologist and promoter of.

8. The Gaping Black Hole of Monetary Ignorance – and the Message
that MUST be put out

One can play around – and many
do – with a whole variety of different ideological combinations of ethnic
identitarianism, nationalism and traditional socialism or communism – and do so
till the cows come home. But so long as those foreign looking guys over there
with their long beards are seen as more of a threat than your friendly and
familiar high street banks and their
underpaid staff you’re being conned.
For those banks are like the brush head
of a vastglobal hoover -
sucking immense wealth from your high street to the City of London and Wall
Street, and ending up in the hands of a ruling elite of criminal banking
financiers like Goldman Sachs, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, J.P. Morgan
etc. That is why it is above all important that socialists and communists of
all varieties finally recognise what they
simply don’t know – and unlike many non-socialists haven’t bothered to even
research and cotton onto – namely that banking, even on the high-street level
is legalised fraud. That a mortgage
or car loan for example, even in terms of Common Law, is a fraudulent transaction; that, unlike money you put in a piggy bank
or safe deposit box, it is not you but your
bank that actually owns the money you deposit in it; that your bank createsthe money it lends you from nothing - a new form of counterfeiting
- and that it makes so much
money from your loans and deposits that it effectively owes you ten
or a hundred times more than you eitherborrow from or deposit with it it. It is high time therefore for socialists and communists to wake
up to the central significance for our times of just one single policy that was already
stated in TheCommunist
Manifesto - “the centralisation of credit in the hands of the state”. Unless the demand for National People’s Banks and National
People’s Money – issued debt- and interest-free - and invested into the real
economy and not the private banking system itself - goes right to the top
of any new political manifesto, the central issue of our times will remain
unaddressed – the monopoly of international and commercial banks on money
creation - and their consequent stranglehold
on national governmentsof any
colour or ideological persuasion, and that however nobly ‘nationalistic’ or
‘socialistic’ their aims may be.

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

America’s strategy for economically and militarily destroying, dividing
and colonising a country.

Set up countless CIA or State Department backed front organisations or NGOs with nice names such as‘The National Endowment for Democracy’ - active in Yugoslavia after Tito and also used to finance the protest movement in the Ukraine and eventually bring about an unconstitutional coup using neo-Nazi paramilitary groups.

Yugoslavia after Tito - use bribes to put chosen politicians
in positions through which they can remove the last elements of any socialist
or social-market economy independent of international finance capitalism, and as after the fall of the U.S.S.R create a new class of oligarchs from corrupt ex-communists.

Sell off the nation’s public services and buy up its industries
at rock-bottom prices - the plan for Ukraine.

Bring about a massive fall in wages and standards of
living for the working class - as occurred in Yugoslavia after Tito.

Use corruption and poverty not to foster genuine popular protest and class struggle but mainly to fuel ethnic tensions and
inflame ethnic hatred - pitting Serbs against Croats and Albanians (or 'Ukrainians' against 'Russians').

Place the country in debt-slavery to international banks,
destabilise its currency and bringruin to as
many sectors of its economy as possible (…soon to be imposed by the IMF in the
Ukraine through abolition of all financial support to agriculture and industry,
a public sector wage freeze, a 40% hike in energy prices, and 50% cut in
pensions).

In the case of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,
refusefurther loans except to regions that assert ‘independence’ - with the
aim of turning
them into economic puppet states for the international banks.

Fund and eventually bring to power the most ethnically or
religiously extreme and racist leadersin each region (think of Milosevic and Tudjman - and
today of the neo-Nazi paramilitary groups used to overthrow a democratically
elected government in the Ukraine).

Create conditions for bloody inter-ethnic wars of the sort we saw occur between the ex-Yugoslav states and regions - and in this
way destroy the infrastructure and weaken the economies of these newly
‘independent’ and ‘democratic’ states, making them even more dependent on loans.

Eventually replace discredited or criminal war leaders with puppet financial bureaucrats as new heads of state (note: the
new President of Ukraine is an ex-banker who is now trying to marginalise the
neo-Nazis placed in government and on the streets – who are now surplus to
requirements having done their job on the streets).

Still use the press and media to make sure that issues of
ethnic, religious and sexual identity still
continue to dominate over economic
issues – for example through propaganda and pogroms aimed at immigrants or
ethnic minorities (…and who knows how many Russians are now being beaten up and
persecuted in the Ukraine).

Eliminate all vestiges and symbols of a country’s socialist
past – as for example most images of Marshall Tito or even memorials to the WW2
partisans cannot be found in states that used to be part of Yugoslavia (…or
statues of Lenin are now knocked down in the Ukraine).

Incorporate supposedly ‘independent’ but now bankrupted, de-socialised
and privatised economies into giant banker-controlled super-states such as the
E.U. (example, Slovenia - but also the
main aim of those backing the pro-EU Maidan square protesters in the Ukraine)

Use disinformation to denounce, defame, destabilise, bring
about civil wars or back coups in any and
all countries (such as Chile, Indonesia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Venezuala etc.
whose leaders refuse to play the game – or else use direct military force to
bring about regime change).

Finally, if Russia
stops playing the game then launch a massive worldwide disinformation campaign
against it. So get all the corporate Western media to talk of Russia ‘invading’
Crimea or even, like CNN pretend to show Russian tanks rolling into Crimea even though Russia has no land border or
roads into Crimea (not to mention having had a paid-for treaty with Ukraine
allowing it to maintain a naval base and permanently station more than 25,000
soldiers there!)

Complain loudly when Crimeans
vote through a fair and supervised referendum to use their independence to protect themselves from armed neo-Nazi
thugs and paramilitaries from the Western Ukraine - whose main hero (Bandera) committed war crimes for Hitler and fought alongside the S.S.
Nazis during WW11.

Ignore the fact the even America didn't have a democratic referendum before declaring independence and was quite happy to support Albanian independence from Serbia.

But why was Tito's Yugoslavia such an important target for destruction to begin
with. Because it was a successful socialist economy with real economic as well
as political democracy – worker management of all companies.

Yugoslavia under Marshal Tito - a successful example of National Bolshevism in many respects and threat to Reagan-Thatcher-Bush-Obama style imperialism and neo-liberal economics i.e. international finance capitalism - which now seeks to destabilise the Russian economy through its trade with Ukraine as well as encircle it with NATO countries (contravening an agreement with Gorbachov).

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Now more than ever, Ukranians need to see that political 'democracy' means nothing without freedom from financial debt. What the E.U. want are to load the Ukraine with debt under the label of 'aid' and then impose Greek-style economic 'reforms' - massive cuts and austerity measures.

Now, more than ever, Ukrainians need to understand the most
important aim and principle of modern National Bolshevism - freeing all
nations from debt-slavery to international banks.

Now, more than ever, Ukrainians need to see that the E.U. is just a mechanism for increasing their nation's debt to those banks.

Now, more than ever, the peoples of all nations - including the Ukraine - need to see that they could solve their so-called 'financial crisis' immediately - not by borrowing more money from banks or by cutting public spending - but by directly issuing their own debt- and interest-free money.

Now, more than, ever, the peoples of all nations - including the Ukraine - need to see that if privately owned international banks are free tocreate new money from nothing - and without borrowing - then so also can nations and truly national banks - public banks.

Now, more than ever, the peoples of all nations need to see that the solution to all their economic problems is public banking - the creation of National People's Banks.

National Bolshevism: the fight for national independence from the global ruling elites of international finance capitalism - along with its puppet empires, parliaments and politicians.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Note: in Russian 'bolshevik' means simply 'majority', i.e. the '99%' as opposed to the '1%' - the elite of global bankers who seek to rule all nations through debt-slavery and in this way create a 'New World Order'. According to Oxfam this 1% now own half the world's wealth.

Why else do you think central
banks have freely given out countless trillions of pounds, dollars and
euros as welfare payments to the big banks - or lend to them at zero
interest?

Why else to you think governments
or can finance fight expensive wars – whist cutting public spending to the bone
in the name of cutting the ‘national deficit?

Why else, despite all the talk
and pledges made to appease the public, is nothing ever actually done to regulate the banks and financial
markets, prevent privatised companies ripping off the state or stop massive
corporate tax evasion?

Why else do you think every
potential Presidential candidate in the States have to arrange a visit the Koch
brothers in their extravagant Park Avenue apartment?

Why also do so-called
‘opposition’ parties go along with this too – as Shadow British Chancellor Ed
Balls did (...after attending the notoriously secret Bilderberg conference of
bankers and politicians)?

Why else did you think half of
Obama’s funding came from Goldman Sachs - itself set up by the Rothschild
banking dynasty?

What does ‘calling the shots’ mean?

You can invade or occupy any
nation you wish, and at any cost to
their people – either militarily or just financially, through forcing them to
accept loans.

You can blatantly ignore
international law – even to the point of sanctioning or engaging in torture.

You can control not only parties
or political leaders in power but also the parties and politicians in seeming opposition to them – effectively
ensuring a one-party system in all ‘democratic’ nations.

You can mire countries in so much
debt that they are forced to privatise their land, property, resources, public
services and utilities and whole industries – enabling you to buy them up at
rock-bottom prices.

You can spy on the calls and
mails of anyone – worldwide – and use the information you gather to blackmail
politicians working against your interests.

You can engage in illegal wars of
occupation, deciding which regimes need to brought down, in what order and by
what means (as, for example set out by the Project for a New American Century
well before 9/11).

You can determine what is ‘law’ –
even though it may blatantly contravene human rights and international law or -
as in the US - the nation’s own constitution.

You can label anyone – even an
small-time investigative journalist – a ‘domestic terrorist’ or ‘threat to
national security’.

You can ‘legally’ (as in the
U.S.) arrest and hold anyone in indefinite detention without legal
defence or even any charge.

Your oil corporations alone can
buy off or pressure entire governments – like that of Nigeria – into doing your
will – for example by selling their valuable natural resources to you at prices
you set and with absolutely no
benefit to their people.

You can instigate coups and
bloodbaths worldwide (for example the death of a million people after the
CIA-backed coup in Indonesia) and yet even despite eye-witness accounts – such
as those from the erstwhile British Ambassador in Indonesia - ensure the media
does not report them at all.

You are only mildly
embarrassed when, for example, the BBC reports the collapse of a third tower
during 9/11 – half an hour before it actually happened, only a
short time after a new Rothschild owner massively increased its
insurance value – and then ‘happened’ to announce that on just that day
(9/11) he could not, as he usually did, have breakfast
with his family at the ‘Twin Towers;.

You can ignore or deride as a
‘conspiracy theorist’ everyone who would seek to expose your
conspiracies, and threaten any opposing nation with dire sanctions if they
don’t obey your will.

You can even kill whoever you
decide to – that is where the CIA and Mossad
come in handy, as do drone strikesor use
of the Echelon satellite system - allowing you to cause an unfortunate ‘accident’
to occur through disrupting the computer system of any car or plane.

You can at any time engineer a ‘false
flag’ situation (like 9/11) that gives the public a viable excuse for you to
engage in illegal wars - such as the war on Iraq.

You can rely on the media to
totally disinform – for example successfully maintaining the absurd illusion that
Saddam Hussein has any liking for or links with Al Qaida – and conveniently
concealing the fact that it was you who first funded and armed them.You can make 'sincere' ethical pleas to punish Assad for supposedly using chemical weapons - whilst having turned a blind eye when you supplied Saddam with them - and he used them en masse against the Kurds and Iranians.

The purpose of National Bolshevism - to reveal and fight the domination of all nations by the Big Banks!!!

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

A promoter of a new Great-Russian
Empire?
A dogmatic Leninist or Stalin worshipper?
A Hitlerite 'National Socialist' or Nazi?
A ‘Nazi
Bolshevik' or ‘Nazi-Bol’?
An atheist or materialist?

The answer is: NO, NO, NO, NO and once again NO.

A
true National Bolshevik is anyone who believes that all nations - big or
small - should be governed directly by and for those who form the
'majority' (the literal meaning of the word 'bolshevik') and not ruled by a tiny
minority of state despots, puppet parliamentarians or corrupt bankers and
bureaucrats - serving only the Empire of Money - of
International Finance Capitalism.

The role of Bolshevism in each and
every Nation today is to work for the interests of the 'majority' or
'Bolsheviks', i.e. the 99% - and in particular to free them from serfdom to today's
parasitic global banking system.

This demands the creation of new types
of People's Banks - local, communal and national - providing interest-free money
to meet the needs of the majority of ordinary people and not the 1% of
super-rich banksters.

Private commercial banks can and do create 'create
money from nothing' every second simply by entering digital money electronically on the
accounts of borrowers - money which counts as THEIR money, and from which they
make huge profits from interest and speculative trading.

They constitute an Empire of Money which rules the politics of all nations, for which all political empires are but an instrument and facade - and whose sole god is the god of money.

Yet if private
banks can create money electronically, so could People's Banks - but
with the fundamental difference that the money that People's Banks created would belong
to the people and that communities and governments could spend it in the
interests of the people - the majority - and not for the private profit of the
few.