Sunday, January 1, 2017

What policies will be pursued by the author of "The Art of the Deal"?

After reading Trump:The Art of the Dealit seems to me that the best way to start thinking about how to answer this question is to ask yourself what Mr Trump could do to further promote his own reputation as a political leader. His policy choices are likely to be determined largely by
the potential they offer for the further self-promotion required to enable him
to win a second term in office.

Some may wonder why I see a book written about 30 years ago
as providing guidance about Mr Trump’s current priorities. Although his
co-author, Tony Schwartz, claims that he actually wrote the book, it is clear
that Donald Trump strongly endorses the ideology of The Art of the Deal and sees his experience in negotiating business
deals as highly relevant to the presidency. In announcing his candidature, he
said: “We need a leader that wrote ‘The Art of the Deal’.”

The Art of the Deal conveys
the impression that the prime motivating force in Mr Trump’s life is
self-promotion. The book is itself a promotional exercise designed to enhance his reputation as a person with the capability of doing deals under difficult
circumstances. Trump is the hero, using publicity as a weapon to defeat incompetent
and evil opponents. He emphasizes the importance of giving the media a good
story. He even views critical stories as providing valuable publicity. Most tellingly,
he acknowledges:

“The final key to the way I promote is bravado. I play to
people’s fantasies. People may not think big themselves, but they can still get
excited by those who do. That is why a little hyperbole never hurts”.

If you think that makes Mr Trump sound more like a politician
than a business leader, consider the way in which he emphasizes that it is
important “to deliver the goods”:

“You can’t con people, at least not for long. You can create
excitement, you can do wonderful promotion and get all kinds of press, and you
can throw in a little hyperbole. But if you don’t deliver the goods, people
will eventually catch on”.

The quoted passage is followed immediately by reference to
two former presidents, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, as examples of leaders
who were good at promotion, but not so good at delivering the goods. This guy obviously
thinks like a political leader, but it remains to be seen whether he will be as good as Ronald
Reagan at delivering policy outcomes that are worth having.

The new president will recognize that to have any chance at
re-election he will have to deliver some of the “goods” expected by the people
who voted him into office. There will no doubt be a flurry of activity to take specific
actions he has proposed for his first 100 days. Over the next few years there
will probably be some real policy change e.g. cuts in corporate tax cuts,
increased infrastructure spending and more restrictive immigration policies. In
the foreign policy arena, application of the Trump doctrine of doing deals with
the big players might end up favouring closer relations with China, as well as
Russia, despite recent anti-Chinese rhetoric. That might make life more
difficult for China’s neighbours, but is probably preferable to the alternative
of deepening tensions between the U.S. and China. In many other policy areas,
including trade policy, we are likely to see major re-branding exercises, with
little actual policy change. Every policy deal will have Trump’s name written
all over it – just like his real estate developments!

When I decided to read The
Art of the Deal one of my objectives was to see to what extent he sees
deals as involving winners and losers rather than mutually beneficial outcomes.
There is some of both. A substantial
component of the “art” endorsed by Trump is actually an entrepreneurial
function that will be recognizable to fans of Austrian economics. The
entrepreneur sees an opportunity to make a profit that others have not seen, and then proceeds to use his negotiation and management skills in pursuit of that profit. If the entrepreneur succeeds, many others also benefit, including original
owners of sites and the air space above them, financiers, contractors, building
workers, and the people who own or rent space in the building. Everyone
involved can be a winner.

The added complication in the entrepreneurial art practiced
by Donald Trump is the prevalence of government regulation impacting on the property
development that he has been involved in. As I was reading The Art of the Deal I began to realize that Donald Trump and
Tony Schwartz were writing about the entrepreneurial function in rent-seeking environments – the highly regulated property development market in New York and
gambling industry in Atlantic City. For the benefit of readers not familiar
with the concept, the idea of a rent-seeking society was developed by Gordon
Tullock and Anne Krueger to describe societies where government regulations
play a large role in determining the distribution of incomes, and substantial
resources are expended by individuals and groups – rent-seekers - lobbying to
have the coercive powers of government used to their advantage at the expense of others. The U.S. is not one
of the first countries that comes to mind when I think of rent-seeking
societies, but rent-seeking is rife in the industries where Donald
Trump learned the art of the deal.

I am not the first to recognize that The Art of the Deal is about entrepreneurship in rent-seeking
environments: Adam Davidson made similar
observations in an article in the New York Times Magazine in March 2016. However,
I don’t think Davidson’s view of Donald Trump was entirely accurate. He
suggested that Donald Trump “is not just a rent-seeker himself; his whole
worldview is based on a rent-seeking vision of the economy, in which there’s a
fixed amount of wealth that can only be redistributed, never grow”. The Art of the Deal portrays Trump’s
real estate development activities as being about adding value to sites rather
than just obtaining benefit at the expense of others. Even allowing for his
hyperbole, Trump seems to see his role as that of a capitalist hero, like a
character out of an Ayn Rand novel, who is using his skills in self-promotion
and his legal team to fight the rent-seekers who are trying to obstruct
economic development.

When he talks about public policy issues Mr Trump sometimes seems to allow his desire to present himself as a
person with a kind heart to get in the way of clear thinking:

“Unlike most developers, I don’t advocate eliminating rent
control. I just think there ought to be a means test for anyone living in a
rent-controlled apartment”.

I wonder whether Trump really sees rent-control as a good
way to provide economic assistance to poor people. A cynic might suggest that
his support for means tested rent control was a rent-seeking ploy to further
his own interests in evicting wealthy tenants from the rent-controlled premises
that he wanted to re-develop.

Adam Davidson might be close to the mark in suggesting that at
an international level Donald Trump’s world view is governed by the idea that
what one country gains another loses. Some passages in The Art of the Deal reflect that view. Trump claims that the
Japanese “have become wealthier in large measure by screwing the United States
with a self-serving trade policy that our political leaders have never been
able to fully understand or counteract”. These days he expresses similar views about China.

From an economic
perspective, Donald Trump’s desire to put America’s interests first in trade
policy would be desirable for Americans (as well as people elsewhere in the world) if only
he knew where America’s interests lie. It is hard to believe that this builder
of innovative modern buildings in New York thinks he can make America greater
by transforming its manufacturing industry into a museum of mid 20th
century technology that can only survive sheltered behind high import barriers.
If he sees America’s interests as providing widespread opportunities for
Americans to enjoy greater prosperity, he should hire some competent economists
to suggest what policies are most likely to contribute to that objective.

If Donald Trump believes his own rhetoric about asking lots
of questions, keeping options open and thinking big, perhaps he could even end
up as an advocate of unilateral free trade, rather than re-branded bilateral
trade deals. In my view the odds are strongly against that, but it could happen!

Postscript:

A couple of months later, I think I was excessively
optimistic in suggesting that we are likely to see major re-branding exercises in
trade policy with little actual policy change. There are two reasons for this. First,
Trump’s most influential advisers strongly favour protectionism and will not be
satisfied with the kind of re-branding that might satisfy the President. Second,
as Barry Eichengreen has pointed out, Trump is likely to focus on trade policy because
it is “the one set of economic policies a President can pursue without close
congressional cooperation”.

It now looks as though the world might be about to enter a
new era of trade protectionism. Some suggestions regarding appropriate
Australian policy responses are in a later post.

Emancipation

Welcome!

Welcome to Freedom and Flourishing. While you are here, why not take a look around and leave some comments.

There is a list of my most popular posts below. I am pleased that a post about characteristics of a good society, that I wrote in 2009, is still one of the most popular. That post captures some of the ideas about freedom and individual human flourishing that I think are most important.