India's transforming into affluence has led specialists to foretell a huge rearmament attempt. The second-most populous state on the earth is commencing to wield the commercial energy anticipated of this kind of behemoth. Its border with Pakistan is a tinderbox, the subcontinent is still susceptible to spiritual extremism, and an army competition among India and China might erupt sooner or later. India has lengthy had the incentive for modernizing its military—it now has the assets in addition. What should still we think to determine sooner or later, and what's going to be the most likely ramifications? In Arming with no Aiming, Stephen Cohen and Sunil Dasgupta solution these the most important questions.

India's militia wish new guns worthy greater than $100 billion. yet every one of these guns needs to come from international providers as a result of the mess ups of India's indigenous examine and improvement. guns providers from different countries are queuing up in New Delhi. a protracted dating among India and Russian brands is going again to the chilly struggle. extra lately, India and Israel have built powerful army alternate ties. Now, a brand new army dating with the USA has generated the best desire for army transformation in India.

Against this backdrop of recent affluence and newfound entry to international army expertise, Cohen and Dasgupta examine India's army modernization to discover haphazard army swap that lacks political course, suffers from balkanization of army association and doctrine, is still constrained by means of slim potential making plans, and is pushed via the pursuit of expertise unfastened from military-strategic pursuits. the nature of army swap in India, specially the disorder within the political-military institution in regards to procurement, is eventually the results of a ancient doctrine of strategic restraint in position considering Nehru. In that context, its method of arming with out strategic function continues to be possible as India seeks great-power lodging of its upward thrust and doesn't are looking to glance threatening. the chance lies in its modernization efforts precipitating a interval of strategic statement or contributing to misperception of India's intentions via Pakistan and China, its so much speedy rivals.

Is terrorism ever morally justified? How should still historic and cultural elements be taken into consideration in judging the morality of terrorist acts? What are the moral limits of nation counter-terrorism? for 3 many years the Provisional Irish Republican military waged an 'armed fight' opposed to what it thought of to be the British career of Northern eire.

Arguing that the ideology of freedom and equality this present day bears little resemblance to its eighteenth-century counterpart, Richard Stivers examines how those values were notably reworked in a technological civilization. as soon as considered a type of own estate and a side of the honor of the person, the context of freedom and equality at the present time is technological ahead of it truly is political and fiscal and is additionally now mostly considered in collective phrases.

Rogue states pursue guns of mass destruction, help terrorism, violate human rights, interact in acts of territorial aggression, and pose a risk to the overseas group. contemporary debates and coverage shifts relating to Iraq, North Korea, Syria, Iran, and Afghanistan mirror the asymmetric makes an attempt to deal with regimes that pursue deviant habit.

A decade and a half arduous wars, punishing financial setbacks, and fast-rising opponents has referred to as into query America's basic place and objective in global politics. Will the U.S. remain the single superpower within the overseas approach? may still it proceed advancing the world-shaping grand process it has because the sunrise of the chilly struggle?

Extra resources for Arming Without Aiming: India's Military Modernization

Sample text

Seeing that the nuclear option was closing down, India tried to test in 1995, but American satellites picked up the test preparations, and Washington was able to pressure New Delhi into backing off. In 1998, however, a new conservative government, buoyed by consensus in India for overt nuclear capacity and set against American nonproliferation fundamentalism, ordered stealthy nuclear test preparations to avoid satellite surveillance. The tests conducted in May 1998 led to widespread criticism outside India but received great support within the country.

The reasons for DRDO’s failure are multifaceted. 7 However, the most important reason is the agency’s lack of political leadership. DRDO officials engaged in exaggerated and wildly over-Â�optimistic statements of their own capabilities, and civilian politicians with little knowledge about strategic or military affairs, let alone the intricacies of military technology and hardware, allowed DRDO a free hand for decades. The civilian bureaucrats who advise the politicians are rarely experts themselves, and defense research is conducted virtually without any accountability.

While for twenty years DRDO has tried and failed to produce a “light combat aircraft” (the LCA), Hindustan Aeronautics, a state-run aviation firm more open to outside influence than DRDO, has designed and manufactured a relatively successful light helicopter. The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), the space agency, is more open and more successful than DRDO. Only the Atomic Energy Commission is more closed and more successful than DRDO. Successful military research and development will require a change in both the philosophy of the Indian state and its attitudes toward private industry.