Are Women Evil?

This article will contain a hefty amount of contradictions, this is because the question requires multiple angles due to its subjectivity. At the end of the article I address the contradictions, the different facets, and try to put it all into perspective, so save the “ah ha! gotcha” reactions for the end of the article.

Are women evil? If so, are they born that way?

I personally believe that men are biologically predisposed to have certain vulnerabilities, and women are biologically predisposed to exploit certain male vulnerabilities. I say I believe this, not that it is scientific truth, and not that a reverse isn’t a simultaneous possibility.

If I said (and I have said this in the past) the prostitute, within my code of morality and value system, is pure evil. Every woman has some degree of prostitute in her. Every woman has a little evil in her.

I believe women look for muscular men to protect them. This trait is useful to women, in the way that money is useful.

I believe women like tall men because height implies strength, see above argument.

I believe women like men who are ambitious & confident, because ambitious means “gonna be wealthy one day”.

I believe women’s sexual attractions are all geared towards using men. What they look for in men is utility, usability, a means to an end, a way to profit.

A man is not the end unto itself, but a means to an end. Women don’t love men, they love what they can do for them. It is within reason to say women feel attraction, but they cannot love men. Anyone doubt this? Well then, why don’t we see more hot sexy women supporting, for life, their stay at home husband? It’s not you they want, it’s the money, the safety, the convenience, the utility, the popularity, and the ego stroke of banging a “winner” that they want, not you.

Women don’t love men.

A man is a set of traits that are useful to her. And if a man should become ill or poor, his useful traits are gone, he is like a household appliance that is broke. You wait to see if it can be fixed, if not, throw it out and get a new one.

Is this evil? In my opinion yes, yes this is very evil behavior. Kicking a man out of his own house that he paid for, simply because his back broke and she found a new sugar daddy to pamper her spoiled ass, is indeed very prostitute of her, it is very evil of her, and evil is as evil does.

I believe this is how women are. I believe they are this way naturally, as in, I don’t think they learned these lessons; it came instinctive.

What evidence do I have for that? Well, let me put it to you this way, where did girls learn the lesson that they should like men who are tall? Men who are wealthy, men who are tough, men who are cocky, men who are muscular? Do you honestly believe these traits that women are attracted to, were taught to them? Did feminism or marxism teach women to like tall guys? Of course not.

And of course, we have to ask about the evo psych of it: are they this way as a result of evolutionary biological factors (i.e. evo psych) yes, yes they are.

If we accept this is how women are, and we accept that these sexual traits women seek is instinctive and not taught to her, than this is biologically driven. Is our biology subject to evolution? Yes it is. Does evo psych explain this then? Well here’s the thing, evo psych would be a theoretical framework used to explain the behavior, so it would be the specific evo psych theory based hypothesis that explains the behavior. And that is where I draw the line on the evo psych shit and urge people to stop making up untestable fairy tale hypothesis to explain personal observations even when those observations are generally agreed upon, and even when it is generally agreed upon that it is instinctive and was thus subject to some kind of evolutionary process. You don’t know the exact process, you will make an ass of yourself trying to fabricate one, you’re liable to really be off the mark and your hypothsis does far more damage than good.

But enough of that.

These tendencies in women, are they evil? Well from my perspective, sure, they’re evil. I hate the word evil, it’s far too subjective, but sure, figuratively speaking, and for the sake of this argument,their instincts are evil.

Are all women like that? Yeah pretty much. Sure there may be a super hot Pamela Anderson looking chick who can’t wait to date a short, out of shape, flat broke, uneducated, shy man. Well no, there really isn’t, but scientifically speaking, it could happen. Of course a comet striking the earth and killing us all before we ever find that woman, is far more plausible.

So, are women evil? Yeah pretty much. Are they born that way? Yup.

But here’s a question, are men evil? Are they born that way?

Men are attracted primarily to women’s physical appearance. Sure a man would love a woman with a really awesome personality… except those women are rare as diamonds, married to rock stars or something, and even under that awesome personality, are still evil exploitative cunts (just with a great personality), or they are ugly fat bitches we ain’t touching with a six foot poll… or at least until we had a 6-pack of beer (with each beer, that poll gets shorter).

Men prioritize women’s smooth youthful skin and curvy shape above all other aspects, including her mental health. Bitch can be a schizophrenic talking in tongues and men would nail her.

And also, if a man has the sexual traits women look for, and thus gets his pick of the ladies, he goes through women left and right, and won’t hesitate to tell her any lie to get in her pants, and will even encourage her to drink one alcoholic beverage after another in the hopes of easing her defenses so she will put out. Yes, he will fuck a woman when drunk, knowing if she were sober, he wouldn’t be getting laid (not that I think this should be rape or illegal in any way, but it is loathsome and despicable behavior, and your average guy does it all the time).

So, aren’t men kinda evil? I’d say those behaviors I just mentioned, are pretty evil. He’ll tell her he’s a rock star, his sports car is in the shop, he’s toured with Iron Maiden, he knows M.C. Hammer personally, he’s a black belt in 20 different martial arts, he’s a Navy SEAL… he’s totally not married at all, he loves her and never met a woman like her before, he’s looking for a good woman to settle down with and tie the knot, she’s very special and should believe in herself, he’s never seen a woman as beautiful as her in all his life, he’d take a bullet for her, every one of her stupid opinions is fucking brilliant, her crappy poetry is just so deep.

Yeah, we’ll say any disgusting lie it takes to bang the bitch, and kick her to the curb the moment some new set of bouncing tits walks by. Are men evil? Well evil is as evil does, so yeah, men are evil.

Are they born that way? Well, they weren’t taught to be that way. In fact, they were taught not to be like that. So yeah, men are just “born that way”.

Also, men make up the majority of violent thugs and murderers. That’s right, world wide violence is now and always has been a guy thing.

So, men and women, both evil?

Well, the only things that could realistically be called evil are humans, we can’t hold simple minded animals responsible for their actions. We can label them as potentially lethal, as violent, as mean acting, but we can’t call them evil.

So only humans can wear the label of evil, and there are only two kinds of people (male and female), thus all of humanity is evil?

Well that can’t be right. If humanity is evil, than there is no good, if there is no good, there can be no evil since evil is that which is not good, and good is that which is not evil.

We could say one sex is good and the other is evil, by determining which one is more evil than the other. So how do we do that?

Here’s a way of looking at it. Humanity in general is evil in the sense that we manufacture a certain level of expectations for moral behavior, that none of us can live up to all the time. But we are good in that we recognize what is good, and aspire to be that way. It’s the age old devil on one shoulder and angel on the other. We humans are forever in constant conflict with our selfish impulsive needs and our higher cooperative self. We’re always battling ourselves to try to get the most out of life, while doing the least amount of harm to others as we can to get it. And this varies from individual to individual, both sexes.

Which of the two sexes are more evil? It’s a dumb question.

Are women evil then? It’s not applicable.

Women are human. There is evil in all of us humans, and thus it is vital that no group of humans be given advantages over other humans because power allows us to be abusive towards those beneath us. Morality is a collectivist instinct acting as a social lubricant based on the principal of cooperation. Thus selfishness is the root of immorality (evil), and altruism the root of morality (good).

So which of the two sexes commit the most amount of selfishness? That’s probably impossible to answer.

So let’s try to reduce this to something more simple. Which of the two sexes, in relation to the other, shows more altruism (less selfishness)?

Now it’s important to point out that this is not saying who is more altruistic , who does less selfish harm, in general. And reason being, take for example war. Is it really a guy thing? It appears to be so. But I said “appears” because there is some subjectivity here.

Allthe killing one male army does against another male army, both under the command of a male leader. Is any of this an act of self sacrifice or altruism ? Could it be both?

Look at one army saying I will sacrifice my life to protect my race, my religion, my country, my culture. Well that’s altruistic… of course the other army is saying the same thing. So they’re both being altruistic? Well, they’re also both being selfish because each is risking their personal life to commit genocide against their enemy so that their people get to live, but the other people, who have been branded “enemy” must die.

Dude, there are both elements of selfishness and altruismin this scenario. Is having a family selfish or altruistic? Let me put it to you this way, not having a family is selfish, so is having a family, both are selfish.

Do you see how complicated this is? So it’s simpler to compare male to female interaction with each other.

Which of the two sexes is more altruistic, less selfish, than the other, in the way we treat each other?

I say men are the more self sacrificing. However that’s just an opinion.

I can point out a man slaving his life away to support his stay at home wife. Of course she’d turn around and say she sacrificed her youth and her body and her independence and her career and on and on. I’d call bullshit on that, but whatever. The point is, it’s subjective.

I will say, in my personal opinion only, men are more giving, and women are more taking.

Things that make me think that is: a man pays for the dinner, pays for the movie, pays for the entire date, and may or may not get sex out of it. Even if he gets sex, the woman has lost nothing, the man has lost money either way.

That’s what gets me about whiny bitches saying “I’m scared, I’m scared of getting used.” I say used for what? She says used for sex. All the while the man is paying for one date after another losing his money trying to score with a woman afraid of “getting used”.

Dude, the whole dynamic between men and women is like this.

Men are givers, and women are takers. And interestingly, the real irony, and we’ve all seen it, in spite of men being the givers and women being the takers, it’ll be the women crying about being taken advantage of. And the man, the man who sacrificed every last dollar in his wallet won’t even consider that he has been taken advantage of.

So yeah, women are truly the more selfish sex.

But when you look at the dynamics of this selfishness, is it biological or environmental? I say it’s biological, but the fault of the man. Men are so horny and desperate to get laid that they are bribing bitches to date them. The biological responsibility here is on the man, not on the woman. So are we looking at women as the greedy sex, or are women just normal every day human greedy, and it’s men who are just designed desperate, made to be taken advantage of?

In other words, switch the power dynamics here.

What if we could put something in the water supply that would kill men’s sex drive by 50% and raise women’s sex drive by 100%

Men have half the sexual urges and women have twice as many, due to the stuff we put in the public water supply. How would this effect gender power dynamics?

Well, I think we’d see a lot of women folding their arms in frustration, being disappointed that she is so fucking desperate to get laid tonight, and yet no guy wants to fuck her. Men, god damn it, all those testosterone bastards do is bowling, and foot ball playing, and foot ball watching, and video game playing and video game making and engineering and guitar playing, and all she wants to do is get laid. She has to go to the mall and ask every guy she sees for his number. Maybe if she owned a sports car that would entice men away from the damn ball game and they’d pay attention to her.

Yeah, I honestly believe that the dynamic of men being on their hands and knees, grovelling and begging for sex, handing dollar bill after dollar bill to women, in hopes that one of them will soothe his desperation, would get reversed if you reversed the level of sexual need in the two sexes.

Would men start acting as greedy as women under those circumstances?

How many men would brag to their guy pals “dude, my girlfriend bought me the new PS5, yeah man, she’s totally cool like that.”

“no way bro, your girlfriend is so thoughtful, I wish my girlfriend understood what kind of presents I like. I mean, she takes me out to all these fancy dinners, but I ain’t that kinda guy. Dude, what I wouldn’t give to find a truly nice girl who totally gets me. Like, valentines day comes and she totally surprises me by handing me a 5150 amp for my Strat.”

Yeah, I honestly believe that if you reversed the level of sexual need in men and women, you’d reverse the entire power dynamic, and guys would be superficial prima donnas whining that their stupid girlfriends just don’t get them, just don’t know how to buy the right gifts for them.

I believe damn near all of the differences in the sexes can be explained by that one fact, men are hornier than women, this puts women in control. Women are human, thus greedy as their environment allows them to be.

And obviously the sexual needs are stronger in men because of biology. Another way of looking at it is, women are biologically predisposed to be less needing of sex, and are thus in control. OK, but does that make them evil?

Well, it causes them to be the selfish sex. Give power to humans and they get abusive. Typically, humans are as abusive as they are allowed to be. Women are allowed to be pretty damn abusive.

Our laws are geared to ensure they get what they want the moment they cry victim. And that is based on men being too prideful of his “male superiority” to complain about disadvantage. Men have to reaffirm their manliness by protecting “the weaker sex” to remind himself of his superiority. And men can’t recognize himself or fellow male as victim, as I explained in this other post on Barbarossa’s website.

If we say women are born evil, what does that even mean? What is evil behavior? If we rule out trying to figure out who is more selfish to the other, and we look at it a different way, what does good female behavior look like?

Go on, open up a word processor and make a list of all the behaviors women should exhibit. Write down all the goodqualities and behaviors. Now look at that list, be honest with your self, is that a description of you? Do you have all those behaviors? Let me guess, you don’t act that way, but it’s OK because you’re a man, and men shouldn’t behave that way.

So evil female behavior is when women act in a way that is not in accordance with your every want and desire. You hold women to standards humans do not naturally live up to, and act surprised when you can’t find a woman that acts that way.

But it’s OK, that crime you committed, is also committed by women, women also hold men to standards that mortal men cannot live up to.

Women will stop looking evil, when you start holding them to human standards and realizing women are going to act the way humans act.

You’ll say things like I want a submissive and obedient woman who loves me for me.

Sure, but are you a submissive and obedient man who loves a woman not for her looks but for her inner specialness? No? Well then where do you get off holding women to those demands? Again, it’s different because they’re women… right? That’s your answer, right? And interesting, this is where many MGTOW will start to cross over into tradcon territory, they will insist that the sexes are polar opposites, and they will insist there is a very special role, a very special magical set of traits that proper women are supposed to have. Right, and when women don’t live up to those mystical magical traits, they’re evil.

Look, men everywhere need to stop doing that. They need to stop saying “but women are different”. Because when you do that you create double standards, you will hold women to a set of standards no mortal woman is biologically wired to live up to any more than you are. And when they fail to live up to those standards, you say they’re ruined, feminism got to them, it was better back in the good ol’ days, or women are just evil and wicked.

And women do the same thing with men.

People need to realize that men and women are humans, and humans are selfish lying little vindictive assholes with a “me first” attitude, only moderately masked by the social pressure to cooperate.

A human being, regardless of sex, when given power over you, will be abusive to some extent with that power, bank on it. Therefore, except under certain vital circumstances, no group of people or individual should hold power over you if they cannot, by a third party, be held accountable for the power they wield.

Police, judges, and parents, are groups that must hold power over specific subjects, but they are held accountable to the people, and even then we see constant abuse, imagine how bad the abuse would be if none of these people had to answer to law or the people. Yeah, it’s a recipe for pure mean spirited tyrants. Don’t believe me, look at the Roman emperors and your ex wife.

People should not be given power over other groups of people, and you should never voluntarily let others hold power over you (such as the power you grant a woman in marriage).

You wouldn’t give one of your guy friends complete legal power over you by allowing them, for no reason, to be entitled to half your worldly possessions, would you? What’s the matter, afraid that by virtue of him being a human, he may one day get angry and take advantage of that contract?

But you’ll hand that power to a woman. And then act surprised when the day comes that she takes advantage.

The problem isn’t that she’s evil, it’s that she’s not saintly. You don’t trust the average guy, because you know the average guy will probably fuck you over if he is given a golden opportunity and a big motive. Well you honestly shouldn’t hold women to higher standards.

If we could view women as if they were men, we wouldn’t need to call their bad behavior “evil”, we could call them “human”.

At the risk of being repetitive, repetitious, and even down right redundant, let me say again, if men held women to the same expectations we hold men, men would not act surprised at the normal, every day, bad behavior they exhibit.

Of course one could argue that holding women to the standards we have for men would produce a never ending series of disappointments when women cannot live up to the standards men are held to. But what we have to askourselves is, why don’t women measure up to men in any category?

Well, the sexes are different, and in what ways, and to what extent, is anyone’s guess.

I will say one possibility outside of biology, is that women have never been expected to live up to the standards imposed on men.

Men have to be willing to lay their life on the line at a moment’s notice. Men have been conscripted into military, law enforcement, and fire fighting, in the past. It was a societal expectation. Women have always been exempt from any responsibility, and I suspect that women like it that way, it benefits them at men’s expense, so what’s not to like, from their perspective.

Men don’t want women taking on responsibility either. You see, if women could handle responsibility, it erodes the specialness of manhood. Men take pride in viewing themselves as the superior sex, the dominant sex, the stronger sex. He sees himself and fellow man as a thousand foot tall giant. The more incapable women are, the more any man gets to feel “manly”. If women were able to hold responsibility, this would make them more like a male, which would decrease how “manly” men are, and men would feel their manliness being tread on (cue the castration anxiety).

So men and women have both sought to make sure women are held to lower standards, and some times different standards.

Because of this, a woman need not exist as a competent being, in fact, female competence would threaten men’s masculinity.

Because women are not held to the same standards as men, they are exempt from blame in many cases. We even see this in the manosphere with ideas such as “it’s not women, it’s cultural marxism that makes them this way, it’s feminism, it’s the leftists, the commies”. That’s right, never the fault of women. Her husband made her do it, an ideology made her do it, the devil made her do it: it’s never her fault.

And in that right there, the exemption from responsibility leads to the idea that women are somehow more virtuous. It’s as if we are seeing women as god-given angels, perfect, pristine, child-like, innocent, nurturing. Those are the standards we hold them to, and we act surprised when they fail to live up to this.

Men who insist that “women are evil” are merely reacting to a great disappointment. These men, like most men, believed women to be heavenly, angelic, divine. And then he learns the hard way what a sneaky, lying, manipulative, ruthless, selfish creature she was. And then he learns, there is no weeding out the good and the bad; women are just like this in general. They only seem wicked, when you once held them to standards of innocents and obedience that is unnatural, and not found in men.

It can be argued (and god knows someone’s gonna do it) that Not All Women Are Like That.

I say yes all women are like “that”. And the word “that”, is a reference to human. All women are human. How bad a woman will hurt men, how wicked, or “evil” they are, is a spectrum, not a binary. Some more selfish than others. The same is true for men.

We can argue that women are born with entitlement issues. OK, maybe they are, but they are also trained to act entitled. We program this in to them.

When children are afraid of the thunder storm, we tell the girls “It’s OK Honey”, we validate their fear and proceed to comfort their emotions. We tell boys “there’s nothing to be afraid of”, and thus invalidate his feelings. It’s as if we are rewarding girls for their fear, and scolding boys for fear. This example, by the way, appeared in psychology literature, I don’t remember the source, and cannot testify to the validity of any study, could have been rad fem propaganda for all I know.

But I have noticed other double standards in the way parents raise boys and girls, and the theme is geared towards boys are to take it, toughen up, and be strong, girls are to be passive, clean, and exempt from blame and responsibility.

And then we have society that instantly entitles girls the day they start growing breasts, which is right around the same age boys start finding breasts fascinating. Boys will fawn over girls, push each other out of the way to talk to girls, buy girls things, and make fools of themselves to gain their attention, and be more than happy to offer the utility of his strength to protect her and beat up any guy that makes her unhappy. And then in our late teens, boys are competing for her attention by out biding each other, offering her the most expensive dates, ensuring her that he has money and will always be a lot of fun to be with. He revs the engine of his new car to show off his ability to blow cash on her and take her places. Women have spent their lives sheltered, exempt from responsibility, and having men compete to see who can best afford her love.

In a world where men give to women, from the onset of puberty, is it any wonder full grown women feel they are just entitled to men giving them things?

Again, we have programmed females to be exempt from responsibility, expressive of their feelings, and feel they are owed something by men.

Interestingly we also teach them that men are rapists who will get them if they stay out too late, get drunk, or if they don’t use the buddy system.

So women walk this earth irresponsible, cry babies, who think their feelings somehow matter, believe men must compete for them, hold themselves up as something special and precious, and fear an evil male rapist is around every corner.

We teach them this behavior.

While some of that could be biology, we need not even bother to go that road, because we taught those obnoxious behaviors into them.

Women are entitled because we teach them they are entitled. Women walk with the arrogance of a goddess, because we worship them like they’re gods. They believe their pussy is a prize that men must compete for. Where did they get this idea? Oh that’s right, we gave them that idea by competing for their pussy, thus giving their pussy value.

Let’s step back from entitlement, and back to responsibility. Women behave like spoiled tyrants, because we don’t force responsibility on them, because we fear if they can handle responsibility, that would take away from the specialness of our masculinity.

You ever notice men will smirk and complain that women can’t do any thing right? They can’t change a flat, they can’t build a house, can’t do simple house repair, they fail to achieve the standards men do in the workforce, women are just so useless.

We’ve all heard men complain about this. But here’s what you need to understand, this is not men complaining, it’s men bragging.

“Women are so useless” is not a complaint, it’s praise of his own ability. If women weren’t useless, men couldn’t be useful.

Men build their entire identity around the fact they can do what women can’t.

We don’t want women taking on responsibility, because if they succeed, we fail, we fail to be as manly as we were (remember, manly means can do what women cannot). Thus we don’t hand women responsibility, and thus when women fuck up, even fuck up by committing bad behavior, we don’t hold them responsible, because responsibility is a masculine trait.

Because women walk this earth seldom ever having to take responsibility for their actions, they never learn to modify their behavior to be cooperative, merciful, honest, or fair.

We call them evil for this. OK, sure, if that’s how we’re using the word evil, but we made them that way.

Now some of you may wince and say “whoa, RBK, are you really committing the hypocrisy of relieving women of responsibility for their actions?”

No, no I am not. They are still responsible for their actions. Let me put it to you like this.

if a child is raised by abusive or irresponsible parents, and he goes on to commit a felony, he must be held accountable for his actions and punished, however, that doesn’t mean the role the parents played can be over looked.

I recall some dude named Chuck, he was tall and fat, 16 years old. He was like a 6’4 Erich Cartmen. The dude was like a pseudo racist bully, who would yell and scream at his mother until she started crying. He was a mean spirited psychopath. One day these two teenage girls were standing on the corner of a Walmart strumming their acoustic guitar while people put quarters in their guitar cases. Chuck decides wouldn’t it be fun to just start throwing quarters at them.

It was such a mean thing to do, he would just throw a quarter at them from time to time. Sometimes they’d yell because the quarter bounced off their guitar, other times the quarter would hit them, eventually one of the quarters struck one of the girls in the head or face, and she decided to pack her guitar up and leave.

This was just the normal every day sociopath shit the guy did. He was just mean as all hell, made everyone’s life miserable, had no empathy or remorse.

Dare I say it, he was evil. It could be argued that he was born evil. But from the one time I went over his house and seen how he interacted with his mother (his only parent), and easily, all genetics aside, the fact he was a spoiled little shit who did what he wanted when he wanted and barked orders at his wreck of a mother, existing in a world with no discipline or consequences for his actions, no guidance or purpose, and physically large enough to bully around all other teenagers, and too young for an adult to stop him, he walked this earth like a spoiled Roman emperor, a fucking psychopathic tyrant who felt entitled to throw coins at people, graffiti and vandalize whatever he wanted, beat up other kids, and grab womens breasts without their permission.

If this lacking of parental authority in his life was present at 16, it was probably there at 15, 14, 13, and who knows, probably since day one. The kid was never taught manners or boundaries. Getting kicked out of school meant he got to sleep in later. The fact his environment provided him with the opportunity to behave this way, is all we need to say he was “raised to be evil”. Could he still have had some predilection to be evil from biology? Sure, I guess so, I mean, you never can rule that out. But why even go there? Why blame genes for what can clearly and undeniably be attributed to parental neglect?

It could be argued that even with the best of parents, he was just going to be a psychopath. And maybe that’s true. But there is no getting around the fact his environment contributed to that. Should Chuck be held accountable for his actions? Yes he should, he was evil, there’s no doubt about that. But his mother should share the blame, she provided him with the environment that led to, or at least, allowed that behavior to go unchallenged.

Anyone that knew him would tell you he was evil, and anyone that went to his home would tell you his environment contributed to that. And no one can say one way or the other whether he was born that way.

So this is how I view the “are women born evil” question.

Could women be born with a certain predilection to commit evil? sure, they very well could. But let’s not over look the fact that in most of their bad behavior, us men teach them to behave this way.

You can argue that we tell women to be submissive, obedient, and to have other characteristics than the ones they have, but that’s a bit like women claiming men should be like X, Y, Z, yet spreading their legs to men possessing other qualities, thereby training men with their actions, a different set of behaviors than the ones expressed verbally.

Women say “Men should be nice, and sensitive, and funny” and then proceed to give sex to the biggest meanest bull dog on the block, or the wealthy guy doing donuts in the parking lot with his new sports car.

Women tell us to be one thing, but reward us for being another.

We tell women to be one thing, but then reward them for being another. We bitch about the way women are, but we trained them to act that way.

We tell women that they are not to have careers, they are not to be self sufficient, they are to be stay at home mothers, reliant on a man’s income… and then sit around wondering why women seek out men who have the most amount of money. Well golly gee, if women are to be poor and not earn money, and reality says the quality of life is largely dependent on how much money you have, is it any wonder they shoot for the richest man?

Now biology may still go into that, but we don’t have to fucking amplify it the way we do.

Really folks, think about it, We (average guy) tell women not to work, they should get their money from their man who supports them. Well, of course they want a wealthy guy. And we bitch that they often use men like stepping stones, ladders to climb, we call it hypergamy. And what is it they do to get labeled as such? They treat husbands like jobs, climbing the corporate ladder. Well if they aren’t meant to work, then each man is in some way, a pay check dispensing boss, than is it hard to see why they are climbing from one pay check dispenser to another? I’m not saying it is the culprit behind the phenomenon called hypergamy, I’m saying it’s a contributing factor at least.

We beat our selves up trying to figure out how to get women to fuck us, we attend seminars, buy books on how to improve game, how to get laid, we invest endless amounts of time, money, and effort into getting women to spread their legs… then scream bloody murder that women now days are cum soaked whores without modesty.

In other words, we tell women to keep their legs closed, and then we bitch that women won’t spread their legs for us, and they’re just too picky.

Well for crying out loud, of course they’re picky. Women have million dollar value because they are born with the holey grail between their legs, the most coveted prize known to the male sex, and there are only two things that can diminish their value, being ugly, and giving it away too much. So the remedy is simple, they obsess about staying pretty, and they turn down dick a hundred times a day and wait for just the right man to give it up to. After all, if you as a man, had to play by these rules we set for women, and you could fuck as many women as you wanted, but with each fuck, your mate quality went down considerably. If you were, on the mating totem, the ultimate perfect 10, and each woman you slept with knocked you down a peg, and 6 women later, you are a 4,(below the average mate value for a man), and you are offered pussy by every woman you meet, you might get really fucking picky about the women you give it up to. You’d want to maintain as high of a status as you can, and shoot for the hottest wife you could get, because too much fucking would lower your mate value to the point where eventually all you can shag is crack whores, you done ruined yourself and the good ones won’t have you any more.

Again, we tell women not to join the work force, and act surprised when they want a man with cash.

We tell women the more they put out, the more worthless they are, and we bitch they don’t put out enough.

And once we have shamed their legs shut, we then try to bribe them open with cold hard cash, we bribe them to go to the movies with us, to dinner, or any where else. We wear thousands of dollars worth of pointless flashy jewelry and brand name clothing to capture their attention. We bribe and bribe them, we praise and worship them, and then we turn around and wonder why women are so stuck up, won’t put out for us, seek out the richest man, and walk the earth with an entitlement complex. Rather than looking in the mirror, realizing our own role in this, we tell ourselves it’s not us, it’s them, they were born this way.

And again, maybe women are born with certain predilections to do these things, maybe we didn’t start the fire, but god damn it we’ve been fueling the fire since day one. We continue to fuel the fire right now, even within the manosphere, we continue to fuel the fire, rather than acknowledging this, we blame their biology. And again, maybe their biology does play into it, but we are making it drastically worse with our behavior and cultural attitudes.

Is it that house wives are evil because they throw men out of their own homes, and take half of everything he owns. Is it her fault? What about the man in this situation? He bribed a woman to live with him and give him sex. He basically purchased a long term prostitute. Should he act surprised when the sex between them was a chore, the orgasms were faked, and she is no longer offering her services when he loses his job and can’t keep up his end of the contract? Should he be surprised when he used money to lore the whore into a marriage contract, and then lost her to a man who could pay her more for the same service? What else would you expect from a whore? And why wouldn’t you consider your stay-at-home wife, who is parasitically leaching off of you, to be a whore? Why did you not see this? How could you not have known this? Did you really fall under the spell of the illusion that deep?

And these husbands who take offense to people like me, calling their stay at home wives parasites, these men, these tradcon men, will go off the deep end, claiming their wife isn’t a parasite, her work is important, her work is vital, it would cost you twice as much to hire people to fix you dinner, clean the house, raise the kids, she most certainly delivers her 50% to the family unit.

Well then, quit screaming “feminism!” when she says “your honor I am entitled to half his money”.

Of course she is, you just said she contributed her share to the family unit. Your income, your life, she was half of what made it possible according to you, by your own admission she is entitled to half your shit, she was half your business partner, you could never have made it without her, you could never have afforded to keep that house, put away all that money in the bank, had you been paying a baby sitter, a house keeper, a cook, and so on.

I know I am going to piss people off, and good, you should be pissed off, but men are at the very least half the damn problem with women. Men are digging their own graves, refusing to acknowledge they are their own grave digger, and blaming it all on feminism. And this is not a defense of feminism, it is just a hardy slap in the face you need to snap you out of it. Stop with the easy answers, stop scape goating. The true TradCon scape goats leftism, MRA’s scape goat specifically feminism, and MGTOW scape goats biology.

You could argue that the bad male behaviors I have listed, are manifestations of biology, and it probably is.

But this would radically change the way we’re viewing it.

For example:

Are women born manipulative, or are men just born suckers?

Are women born exploitative, or are men just born to be exploited?

Are women born with an entitled goddess complex, or are men just born pussy worshipers?

If its all a question of biology, is it the biology of woman or the biology of man that is at fault?

If you had looked at women as men without dicks, from day one, you wouldn’t have deified them in your youth, to be so angry that they didn’t live up to your deification.

And so the question will be asked again, are women born evil? And the answer is: they are born human, and whether you think humanity is ultimately good or think humanity is basically evil, is up to you.

I will caution you against saying women are born evil. I believe evil is not what you are, but what you do.

And to suggest women are born that way, excuses the behavior. Women are born to menstruate, they are born to exploit male sexual need, and thus use a man’s sexual need for her advantage.

If we believe it is the product of biology, and is beyond her control, then she cannot be at fault.

When a wife gets angry and has herself a little fussy tantrum and begins throwing things and breaking things, well you know how women are, they get like that, it’s that time of the month, she is no more able to be held accountable for her hissy fit than she can be held accountable for bleeding from the crotch.

I’m sorry but I don’t believe that nonsense. Women are responsible for their behavior, any behavior they are predisposed to is still ultimately under her control. When people are angry, they want to hit the source of their anger. That’s natural, that’s instinct, that’s biology. And men are most likely more biologically predisposed to acts of physical violence than women (probably), but that in no way justifies a man hitting someone in anger. Nor should parents turn a blind eye to their son’s beating up other kids, on the grounds that “he was born that way, boys will be boys”, that shit doesn’t fly.

Women need to be held accountable for their actions. And it could be argued that even if we hold them accountable for their actions, they have a certain predilection to do things because of their biology. And to that suggestion, I say OK, true, but wouldn’t that make them dangerous, not evil?

And is it that women are dangerous, or are men just really vulnerable? Think about it. This is why I often point out male vulnerability. Pointing out where men are vulnerable, how the vulnerability exists in him, what manifestations it has, is more beneficial then pointing out where women are dangerous.

Women are dangerous in a lot of different ways, and all of them starting with you want their pussy more than they want your dick, that puts them in control of you, and that is the origin of all the danger that comes from them. I like to point out the various weak spots in male psychology. It’s like male psychology is a roof, and women are the rain, and my goal isn’t to keep harping on wet the rain is and whining about all the property damage caused by the wet rain leaking through the roof, I would rather shine a light on the holes in the roof and say “that’s where the leak is”. I just believe it is more advantageous to point out where your vulnerabilities are, than to point out all the ways in which women are “out to get you because they were born evil”.

You’re not going to make water stop being wet, you have no say in the weather, but you can repair your roof, or at least move valuables away from the holes in the roof, and put out some pans to catch the drip. You can’t change the external conditions outside of your house, but you have control over the internals of your house.

This is why, regardless of if water chooses to rain on your house, or is just a product of its gravitational nature, from your perspective, it’s all outside of your control, focus on the inward, not on the outward.

In this regard, it may be more digestible, more workable, to assume women have a born evil in them.

If viewing things from that perspective helps you to act in a defensive manner to safeguard yourself, than so be it, considering women to be evil has that utility to you.

But in the larger scheme of things, more in the abstract, no, women are not evil. But again, it may be helpful for some men to just approach them as if they were. They are, after all, dangerous. And of course, as mentioned, they are as dangerous as you allow them to be. Not seeking them removes all, or nearly all, of the danger.

In spite of the fact I fully understand the value, the personal utility of saying “women are born evil”, a fear I have is, if we just say “women are evil”, then I can’t help but suspect that will be used as means to halt inward reflection, and deflect blame for one’s own weaknesses, onto women.

It’s a problem I see often in the TradCon, he wants to “blame feminism”. As I have pointed out countless times, the traditional way of life is self defeating. The TradCon claims women are to stay out of the work force and at home raising children which is what women do best. And then in the divorce, blames feminism for child custody going to her.

He cannot see the holes in the roof because he is too busy blaming the evils of rain. He cannot see the forest for the trees. He is not aware that his own philosophy is flawed. He is not self critical so long as he has a scape goat. That intellectual crutch keeps him from using self criticism which causes his mind to atrophy.

I fear MGTOW using “biology did it” and “born that way” and “evil” as cop outs to shirk responsibility onto a third party; rather than self criticism.

Back before I was MGTOW, I was a moderate TradCon (I was never full blown TradCon). I viewed women as “less then men” I viewed them as a completely different species, I never held them to male standards because I knew the inferior little shits couldn’t live up to those standards, it was just in their biology. I put all blame and responsibility into two categories, women’s biology (their fault) and let’s sock it to the feminists. Before I was MGTOW, I never looked inside myself to see my own failure, vulnerability, and down right errors. And so I fear a blanket statement like “women are evil” or “blame it on biology” will end up leading down one of three paths:

1. Women are removed from personal accountability.

2. Individuals holding this view will not be self critical, and will scape goat.

3. Defeatism and Futility will set in, causing intellectual paralysis.

Evil or not, born or taught, isn’t really important.

You either accept changes, to some degree, can be made, and that those changes must start within you, and then must spread to thy fellow man.

Or you act as if there is no free will, and no course of action should be taken by you or anyone, it’s all so hopeless etcetera.

And if that last one is where you are at mentally, I have to ask: Why? If no amount of knowledge and understanding will change women, men, or you as an individual, in any way, then why the fuck are you reading MGTOW blogs and watching MGTOW videos?

So again, evil or not, born that way or taught, it’s rather irrelevant.

If we are replacing “evil” with “dangerous”, does it make it better or worse? Well, I want nothing to do with her, I don’t want to sleep with her or even really be her friend. I don’t care if she is that way by instinct or taught, a person is the sum of their actions either way.

And now we move on to, what is the answer, what do we do to fix this? How do we fix the problems

Well, I honestly have no easy answer. I don’t know how much of any of this can be fixed. But I can tell you where a fix would start.

A fix would have to begin with an understanding of the problem we face.

TradCons, MRA’s, PUA’s and other “anti-feminists”, realize there is a problem. They often misfire and shoot at things that are not the actual problems. Also, they don’t look for a genuine cause to the problems. They say leftism, progressivism, feminism, etcetera.

They are prideful, and that pride makes them unable to look into the mirror. They look for problems from outside of themselves, they look for solutions outside of themselves, and outside of men.

What we need to do is to not be prideful, we need to look for the problems from within, we need to look for answers from within.

Self reflection, seeing what we really are, and how we are, and then making internal changes in ourselves, changes in our perception and attitudes, and then helping other men to also look within, change their perception and attitude, and when that spreads over our culture slowly but surely, it will cause a cultural shift, new cultural attitudes, new behaviors and values will come from that.

And will that fix our problems? Will that fix any man’s problems? I don’t know, but it’s where the start must take place, from within. We must not allow our ego, our pride, to mask our own weakness when we look in the mirror. We must not say to ourselves “I’m perfect, did it all right, it’s their fault, every thing is their fault” (whoever “their” is referring to).

Let me tell you why you must stop doing that. You cannot change “them”. You, as one individual, cannot change government, dominant political ideologies, biology, women, or even other men. You as an individual cannot force others and groups around you to change, to stop existing or stop being that way. You can inspire others, but not force them.

You only have control over you. So look within yourself, examine your mistakes.

And I am not saying beat yourself up. And I am not telling men who have given up dating to “get back on the horse”. I am telling you to examine how your own ego, and how your own defense mechanisms, and your own prejudice views, have contributed in some way to the problems faced by you and your fellow man, and then… stop doing that. Change the way you see things, change the way you respond to things, and then inspire other men to do the same. But it all starts with shedding the ego, taking off the mask, looking into the mirror, exploring our own existence and how we perceive reality, and the origin of our wants. Just looking into our motivations, our preconceptions, where does any desire come from? And obviously, we’re all wired with wants, that’s a given, but it’s not a deep enough answer, look deeper.

Now, I want to wrap this up.

I have said women are evil, women are not evil, it is men’s fault, it is women’s fault, biology and environment did it. I said we must focus on the internal, while mentioning the importance environment plays rather implies a goal of changing the external.

Yes folks, I am aware of all the contradictions. But these are not direct contradictions, they are the same fact looked at from different angles. The question of: “are women evil, were they born that way, who’s to blame”. This is an amazingly complex problem that requires multiple angles. So let me try to wrap it all up, and make sense of it.

Are women evil?

Well technically no, but it may very well be a useful tool for you as an individual to view them as such.

Is it the fault of men, or the fault of women?

It’s both, it’s a symbiotic problem. Women are selfish and exploitative in their behavior, but I don’t think all of it is being born with a special female evilness, I believe the great bulk of it is just normal, gender neutral, abusive exploitative selfish behavior that makes up humans. They just happen to be in a position to act on it, and we hand them that power by being desperate for sexual relief, which is unfortunately, pretty damn hard wired. And while some men can over come all of it, or even a large portion of this instinct, men in general are going to remain slaves to this instinct. However, men can become aware of certain manifestations of this instinct, learn in exactly what way this hurts him, enslaves him, and then counter this (to some extent).

Should women be judged for their selfish exploitative mating preferences?

Of course. Us men take shit all the time because us rotten pervs like big boobs and rounded asses on a thin woman and oh what shallow superficial “little boys” we are for it. Your damn right women should be shamed and crucified for their disgusting mating preferences just like we are.

Women being “born that way” no more justifies their exploitative actions than “that pedophile was born that way” justifies him violating a child. Both are born with an involuntary instinct, and both must be held accountable when they choose to act on the instinct and someone gets harmed by it.

Is it Nature or environment?

Both. It’s mostly environment, but this environment is a direct manifestation of some simple biological drives. That doesn’t mean it can’t change. The biology will pretty much always be there. But through understanding, our cultural attitude can change, and with a changed attitude and new focus, an acknowledged problem can be remedied, and maybe not 100% but it can be modified. And certain co-morbid behaviors manifesting from the basic drives can be reduced or circumvented too. And of course change leads to change which leads to change etcetera. So how much of the problem can be fixed? I don’t know, we’ll start out slowly and see how far it can be pushed. In the mean time, laws that protect men’s wallets from the predatory behaviors of women can be put in place, and women exploiting mens sexual needs can be punished in many ways, and the men that give in to the exploitation can be shamed for it. These problems, even though they manifest from biology as do all problems ever known to man, can be worked with and reduced, it begins with acknowledging them as problems and then working on fixing them step by step.

Is our goal to change the external or the internal?

Both. We start out, as individuals, looking into ourselves, making notes of things, reconstructing our perspective and value system, and then most likely, even without effort, simply due to the new perspective and values, our unconscious mind will start turning the gears and we will alter, forevermore, how we think and feel, until our behavior correlates to our new values. So we start with the internal, and we encourage other men to follow suit. In time, more and more men do the same. While this process will not be 100% for everyone, it can become at least a cultural trend (I’m not even talking about abstinence; only perspective changing) and it will have a cultural impact eventually. Enough men changing their views and value system, will send a powerful shock wave throughout our culture, eventually, because men and women have a degree of symbiotic interplay, this will have an effect on women, which will feed back into men, which will grow the perspective, which will effect women and so on and so forth until it hits its plateau. What over all effect will it have? How much male freedom, safety, equality, autonomy, will be generated by this? I don’t know, but certainly more than we have now.

What’s-His-Face made a video about “are women evil” and the community seems to be divided on evil women. I believe the great bulk of the community is reacting out of ignorance, and just going with knee jerk reactions on both sides of the debate. Perhaps this article will broaden the picture, offering new information, showing different facets of this multifaceted subject, and lead us to greater understanding… or maybe I don’t know what the fuck I am talking about and should get off my high horses. Either way, made you read this long ass thing, didn’t I :p

I agree, this is brilliant. And i wonder, can man and woman ever be equal due to their biology, perhaps we could, i just look at the movie Avatar, men and women in that movie are equal due to their suroundings and the way of life, is this possible with homo sapiens, i dont know, perhaps it is, but not on this planet with the current standard way of life. Perhaps a question that can only be aswered by the ones who created us the way we are.

“Sure, but are you a submissive and obedient man who loves a woman not for her looks but for her inner specialness? ”

Yes, actually this does describe a large number of blue pill men. Particularly the married ones. A lot of men go the “nice guy” route and only start buying into the “men should be masculine, women should be feminine” mentality until after they realize that being submissive and obedient negatively impacts their ability to get laid.

Being submissive and obedient may negatively impact a man’s chance to get laid (as it would his chances of having healthy peer friendships and do well at work – no one likes a sycophant) but it’s unclear why he should then swing to the opposite extreme and expect women to be submissive and obedient.

The realization that sycophancy doesn’t make women more attracted to you – nothing does – can be the catalyst for developing a healthy model of relationships, one based on respect for each partu.

The irony is the the kiss up approach is often replaced with a more refined form of kiss up. It is not a coincidence that many PUAS used to be kiss ups – their psychology hasn’t changed, just their tactics. They are just trying to be better kiss ups.

The relationship model of a kiss up is between servile and dominant. He cannot conceive of two mutually self respecting adults engaging in an equal give and take. He starts out by adopting the servile position, and finding that doesn’t “work”, he tries to adopt the “dominant” role, since that is the only other role ge can conceive of.

Of course that doesn’t work either, because healthy relationships are based on mutual give and take. Yet the kiss up is stuck – the only two roles he can conceive of have failed him, yet he cannot admit this so he proceeds to spin his wheels and tell himself he needs “more practice” in the dominant role.

The realization that sycophancy doesn’t make women more attracted to you – nothing does

Could you clarify what you mean by “nothing can make women more attracted to you?”

Are you saying that you don’t believe that a man can increase a women’s attraction to you beyond a base established by your looks and status?

Are you saying that you don’t believe a man’s behavior has any affect whatsoever on a woman’s level of attraction to him?

Or is there a different nuance to what you are saying that I am not perceiving?

Also, could you provide some examples from your own experience to explain why you think this way? My own interactions with women lead me to believe that your behavior can actually drastically effect your ability to arouse a woman. I try to be open minded though, and I need someone to provide strong evidence that counters my current beliefs before I will change them.

Yes, I think behavior has ZERO impact on attraction qua attraction. You can’t increase sexual attraction – at all – through behavior. Its entirely looks and status.

Behavior can have some affect on your likelihood of hooking up, though. Extremely off putting behavior – extreme arrogance or hostility – can drive away an attracted woman, as can extreme social awkwardness (although the bar is set lower than most men are worried it is).

As long as you’re not particularly off putting your behavior has almost no impact.

And to the extent that behavior does matter, it is in the direction of being sociable, friendly, and without ego – the opposite of PUA advice.

Its almost impossible to provide evidence over the internet, but I am basing this on over a decade of heavy going out – I’m a big partyer, although I’ve slowed down lately – and believing, once, like you did, that behavior makes a difference.

It is good to see someone say this explicitly: behavior has little or no effect on the fundamentals of attraction. It is hard to accept, but I think it is largely true. Either you have it, or you don’t have it. And if you don’t have it, you can only fake it, and faking it is not the same as having it.

Thanks for continuing the discussion with me George. I know it can be annoying to sit down and attempt to explicitly spell out one’s position via a comment, so I appreciate you putting the effort in.

Could you further clarify what you mean by “attraction qua attraction,” and how that differs from “the likelihood of you hooking up?”

Also, could you clarify your beliefs on how a woman measures your “status?’

Its almost impossible to provide evidence over the internet,

I disagree – it’s simply a matter of formulating a falsifiable hypothesis on how a given interaction would play out based on one’s beliefs, and then providing details from various interactions that play out in a manner that supports that hypothesis, or in a manner that diverges from the prediction.

It DOES, however, require trust that the other person is being honest, and paid enough attention to remember the details later. From the tone of your posts, and the effort you’ve put in to explain yourself, I believe I can trust that any experiences you share are, at the least, a best faith attempt to share the truth. I hope you can feel the same way about me.

I’ll provide an example of what I mean in my next reply – I don’t want to pollute the discussion with my own assumptions on what you mean by “attractIon” and “status vs behavior” before you’ve had a chance to further clarify.

Sexual desire is sexual desire, sometimes known as lust. However, lets say a woman is abusive and demeaning towards me – I may choose not to satisfy my sexual desire with her, no matter how attractive I find her.

This is does not seem like a confusing concept to me – can you perhaps explain what seems puzzling to you about it, or what needs explaining about it?

Women assess your status by a close scrutiny of your lifestyle, wealth, and social circle, over an extended period of time (several dates – its partly what dating is for).

Behavior is not a significant factor in assessing status – many extremely high status men are quiet and do not draw attention to themselves in public, and it is common for low and medium status men to act splashy in public, out of a desire to convince others they possess something they realize will not be readily perceived or granted them. Status signalling is commonly a reflection of status-anxiety, and very far from from an accurate signalling of the real thing.

Reliable evidence would take years of constant controlled testing and controlling for variables, false causality, and other confounding factors.

But if we don’t hold ourselves to an impossibly high scientific standard, I do believe we can make some common sense observations that would produce a reasonably acceptable picture, and since I have over a decade of extensive experience I’d be happy to take that journey with you.

Thanks again for continuing the dialogue. I’ve got to pack for a fifteen hour train ride on Thursday, and I want to be able to devote enough time for a proper response, so I probably won’t be able to truly follow up until Thursday night.

I just wanted to give you a heads up so you didn’t think I was going to leave you hanging.

Sorry for the extreme delay in responding, even after the deadline I’d set for myself. I didn’t end up getting any sleep the night before my train ride…then I got caught up in my vacation…and then I’ve just been procrastinating on being productive since I got back. I have this strange reaction to writing posts – when I first read a comment, I have an extremely strong urge to write a response, but if I don’t write one while that urge is there, then it turns to apathy and I tend to move on to the next one. In this case though, you have been very responsive to the dialogue, and I do want to continue it, so I had to overcome my usual apathy, which took some energy when I’m in the midst of procrastination mode.
Anyway, to finally address your points:

This is does not seem like a confusing concept to me – can you perhaps explain what seems puzzling to you about it, or what needs explaining about it?

When you said you did believe that behavior can affect your chances of “hooking up,” I wanted to make sure I understand the difference in your mind. For some people, they would strictly define attraction based solely on whether or not a woman sleeps with you. Beyond that though, I find in any debate/philosophical discussion that it is crucial to come to a mutual understanding of terms. It’s very possible that we actually share the same views, but the semantics we use to express them are different enough that it appears we disagree. Furthermore, even if there is a fundamental agreement, defining terms allows me to comprehend exactly what your arguments entails so I don’t waste time fighting straw men born purely of my ignorance on your language style.

For myself, I subscribe to the “alpha fucks/beta bucks” view of attraction that Rollo Tomassi operates from when he writes his blog posts. The form of “attraction” that RBK outlines in this article – evaluating a man based on his utility to her – falls under that concept of “Beta Bucks” attraction. As Rollo would say, a woman speaking of “attraction”, in this context, uses it in the same way that she might say a counter is “attractive.” This kind of attraction inspires women to sleep with men on a sort of maintenance basis – in many ways it’s like a chore designed to keep the attention from a man alive and well, but otherwise inspires very little lust within her. On the other hand, there is the “alpha fucks” form of attraction, which Rollo would term “arousal” and other manospherians would term “tingles,” where a woman experiences that same primal level lust that men feel for a well-shaped woman. It is an irrational drive that pushes for an immediate, or near immediate, outlet for that sexual tension.

I don’t believe that these are binary states – I believe that they exist, separately, on a scale. I believe it’s possible for a woman to feel similarly high or low levels of both BB attraction and AF arousal, and I also believe it’s possible for a woman to feel a high level of one form but a low level of the other. I also believe that, for a woman to sleep with a man, no strings attached, she needs to reach a certain minimum level of AF arousal AND experience a high enough level of it that her body instinctively perceives that the “price” to be paid (which is dependent on the circumstances) is lower than the benefit of obtaining the man’s genes through sex. I specifically say body and not mind because I don’t believe that a woman’s conscious mind plays any part in that evaluation – consciousness belongs to BB attraction and unconsciousness belongs to AF arousal.

I also believe that it is possible to “measure” AF arousal, albeit extremely inaccurately, through what Pickup Artists would term “Indicators of interest.” These would be subtle body language cues given off by the woman, often unconsciously. Things such as playing with her hair, especially if she reveals the nape of her neck to you in the process, crossing and uncrossing her legs in your direction, touching you. Also, even subtler body language cues such as a stiff/tense posture while standing next to you and tilting her head slightly so as to place you JUST within her peripheral vision.

Reliable evidence would take years of constant controlled testing and controlling for variables, false causality, and other confounding factors.

But if we don’t hold ourselves to an impossibly high scientific standard, I do believe we can make some common sense observations that would produce a reasonably acceptable picture

I agree , and my point was that I wanted to hear some specific details about interactions you’ve had. For example, there was an incident back in college that solidified my belief in my ability to judge whether or not a woman is attracted to me. I was listening to the professor lecturing, and I got the distinct feeling that one of my classmates was checking me out (she was in my peripheral vision, and I was not consciously paying attention to her at first). When I looked over at her though, I saw absolutely no direct signs that she had been looking at me – I didn’t catch her quickly turning away and she did not acknowledge that I was now directly looking at her – she appeared to be paying complete attention to the professor.
When I turned back the feeling went away…for about three to five seconds, at which point that feeling returned. Again, I looked over at her directly, and again I saw no evidence. I then decided to test my hypothesis with an experiment. Mentally, I told myself that if I am correct that this woman is checking me out/is aroused by me (and if my assumptions about how arousal/AF attraction works are accurate) then she will directly turn her head to look at me if I start gazing at another woman in the classroom. So that’s what I did, I directly turned my head so that I was blatantly gazing at another woman at the front of the classroom (one that I actually felt no attraction to – she was clearly much less attractive than the woman I suspected was checking me out). I held my gaze on her for about five to ten seconds. Sure enough, the woman I suspected of checking me out then blatantly turned her head to look directly at me.

Behavior is not a significant factor in assessing status – many extremely high status men are quiet and do not draw attention to themselves in public, and it is common for low and medium status men to act splashy in public, out of a desire to convince others they possess something they realize will not be readily perceived or granted them. Status signalling is commonly a reflection of status-anxiety, and very far from from an accurate signalling of the real thing.

I think this is an area where, perhaps, we are using different terms to say the same thing. I agree that status signalling is a reflection of status-anxiety – and this is exactly what I would include when I say “behavior.” You can learn that obvious “status signalling” – for instance buying an extremely expensive dinner for a date to signal that you have lots of money or blatantly interrupting a man and talking down to him to “prove your dominance” – is unattractive and then take steps to eliminate that behavior. Of course, attempting to change your behavior and actually changing your behavior are two different things, and I feel like that is the main contention that most MGTOW tend to have with “game proponents.”

They see “PUAs” attempting to change their behavior, but failing to do so, and then say “see, game doesn’t work.” In my opinion, however, this is a faulty argument – it’s not that “game” doesn’t work, it’s that the individual failed to properly alter his behavior. This IS a good case to say a specific method or technique doesn’t work – but to say that “game”, as a whole, is wrong based on the failed application of one particular methodology is poor argumentation in my mind.

There are NUMEROUS theories and recommendations on how to behave that encompass “game”, and many of them contradict each other – sometimes in subtle ways and sometimes in mutually exclusive ways.

Now this comment has gotten extremely long, so I’m going to cut it off here. I apologize if I’ve left it in a confusing state – I’ve already gone over the time I would normally devote to my lunch break, so I won’t really be doing any re-reading or editing.

I still think the situation is far more complex than you’re ready to admit. And most of what you say does not really address the question. I also agree with you that women gve fairly obvious signs of intetest, but am again unclear how that’s connected to the question.

I agree with you that women sleep with some men based on attraction, and others in e change for something, but the question is does the way a man behave affect sexual attraction.

To give you an example of why it’s complex.

Many guys grow up afraid and shy around women, then later in life learn that by devaluing women they gain the confidence to be social around them. Will farrell discussrs this. They then conclude that these “alpha” attitudes made women notice them. In their minds, the association between aggressive behavior and sucess with women is clear, but they are woefully mistaken about the precise mechanism.

Another useful example is of the psychopath who is successful with women, the famous “dark triad” personality. In this case the researchers are as naive in interpreting the evidence as the clueless pua, which leads to the suspicion that both are driven by dysfunctional western cultural imperatives towards seeing what they wish.

The pua, and often the researchets, conclude from the mere fact that dark triad types rack up many partners that these traits are uniquely alluring to women. Yet the tactics psychopaths use to seduce their victims makes clear the exact opposite is the truth.

The psycopath goes to enormous lengths to hide his dark traits during the initial seduction phase and to simulate the exact opposite. He strives to be caring, kind, polite, charming – supposedly non alpha traits. Only when the victim is hooked does he reveal his dark side.

It would seem, then, that the dark triad type himself, supposedly the apogee ofalpha, utterly rejects alpha traits as useful for seduction.

The psychopath also carefully selects vulnurable women and hones his ability to detect them, and discards women because he is incapable of empathy.

So – the brute fact that psychopaths rack up a high partner count is seen as an artefact of merely honing his ability to select vulnurable women, a disinterest in long term relationships, and an explicit and conscious rejection of so called alpha traits as counterproductive for seduction.

Yet the dark triad personality is routinely held up by PUAS as well as researchers as a vindication for their tjeories, illustrating that association and causality are hard to decipher without lots of experience, an honest mind, and perhaps wisdom, and that seeing causality is often just a reflection of cultural biases or personal preoccupations and wish fulfillment fantasies.

My case provides me with a rare, and thus perhaps useful, perspective. I’ve been a playboy for going on fifteen years, and during that time I underwent multiple shifts in mood, approach, attitufe, beliefs, and values. Most men don’t mutate as much as I have and won’t have the opportunity to see how radical shifts in behavior affect outcome.

The answer:very little, if at all, with one exveption. I’ve been aloof, dominant, macho, superior, as well as the opposite, and what I have learned is two rhings.

One, women will tolerate a fairly broad range of behavior without it having any impact. If you are too nervous and shy, it will harm you, if you are too arrogant and haughty – say the kind of behavior regularhly prescribed on roissy/heartiste – it will antagonize and harm you. As long as you are in “nirmal” range it won’t matter.

Second, the one thing needful to realize your potential with women (not increase atraction, as I think that’s impossible) is to be socially “open”, pro-social, and socially “available” not closed off for intimacy and emotional contact, as intimacy is one of the main things women want from you.

If you are able to be “charming”, ie very friendly, kind, loving, open, easy, and intimate – the opposite of “alpha” and the way psycopaths are at the beginning to seduce their victims – you will further grease the wheels, bit it’s hardly necessary.

But nothing overcomes the unalterable physical facts of ypur physical appeal and money/status, as I have discoveted.

I have gotten women being macho and dominant but within normal range (not the stupid stuff u c on roissy). Then a time came when I said screw this nonsense and explicitly and consciously dropped the whole big ego big man act and just stopped giving a shit about my image – I explicitly renounced “alpha” and ego and just stopped caring – and got to s of women that eay, and had way more fun and self respect.

While I’m not a mgtow, the sheer intellectual honesty and openness to ideas that you find among mgtow can be found nowhere else among anti-feminist men’s sites.

I have been banned for making similar suggestions, much more mildly, on other men’s sites.

The problem of human evil is a serious one, and many male/female problems are really just problems of human evil.

Like all abstractions, things like evo-psyche are poor guides to dealing with a messy reality even though it captures some of the truth in broad outlines.

Humans are contradictory creatures and you cannot ‘pluck out the heart’ of their mystery.

Evo-psyche says guys compete and undermine each oher for women, yet I have never felt the urge to do so. Have I failed evo-psyche, or has evo-psyche failed to explain me? Yet I would be a fool to deny that many men behave this way. I have been on the receiving end of it.

I have known women to financially support destitute lovers with no future prospects, and many women despise men with large muscles. What has evo-psyche to say about this?

Like all elegant abstractions, it captures a portion of the truth, perhaps a broad tendency. And like all non-rigorous modern science (see Ionnides) it tends to be merely a reflection of prevailing biases, as is the case with most nutrition advice.

The problem of evil is especially acute in modern times, with its emphasis on selfishness and lack of inhibition or restraint. We are breeding a society of character disturbed people. Already estimates of cluster B person laity disorder rates hover at 15-20 percent.

PUA appeals to people with cluster B personality disorders who seek vindication for their natural tendencies. I don’t think it is actually about getting girls (as it doesn’t work, and would create empty and sterile relationships if it did work so that you might as well visit a prostitute if you’re just after physical relief. Yet PUAS are notoriously and curiously averse to prostitutuon).

I wonder how much shittines women display is just human aggression and exploitation freed from restraint by modern conditions, and has nothing to do with timeless female ‘attraction’ modules, and that has its exact analogue in male shitinness seen across a range of fields like finance down to the way some men will pathetically undermine other men in front of women, rather than rely on their own genuine appeal.

Emotionally open, generous men – all good qualities that can be a major source of joy – often fall prey to the character disturbed, often repeatedly. And our modern psychological climate which seeks to explain away evil, and claims all human aggression is a ‘defense mechanism’ rather than naked aggression that should be fought, renders many of us self-doubting and without the proper conceptual framework with which to defend against evil.

This reminds of the time Sir. Barbarossaaaa talked about the male mother need. Men tend to asphix a goddess like quality to women, like they gave for their mothers. I throughly enjoyed the article, it gave a good perspective and to know our gynocentric tendencies is a great step to getting rid of those extra weeds growing on us. Thank you sir. RBK.

“Self reflection, seeing what we really are, and how we are, and then making internal changes in ourselves, changes in our perception and attitudes, and then helping other men to also look within, change their perception and attitude, and when that spreads over our culture slowly but surely, it will cause a cultural shift, new cultural attitudes, new behaviors and values will come from that.”

What is speculated on may be applicable to the individual. As it has for me a few times. Its not necessarily incorrect just that it doesnt explain all actions male or female take.

I more or less agree with you, nutnI dont percieve a voluntary interaction as evil. This is where the difference in subjective definitions come into play. But youndid address the main point that have with all this talk.

I get the feeling that when quite a few men in this community call women out as evil, they somehow see themselves as more virtuous and above women. And dont have the humility or honesty to admit that if environmental circumstances were different. Male behavior may be deemed more “evil” then their female counterparts. It just comes off as hypocritical and lacking awareness from my viewpoint.

It seems that the men that do this tend to come to the community because they were raped financially and emotionally in court and still are today. So perhaps calling women evil gives them an ego boost and help them feel good?

Its understandable if that’s the case. But part of me selfishly wants them to get over it. I feel its jolding them back.

My issue with the idea of feeling superior to women is that I personally feel it to be a burden. Not something to brag about. I grew up in a very girl power culture and was disappointed at what most women I felt with turned out to be. I don’t think telling ourselves women are equal or letting go of the sense of superiority we may feel in relation to them will change things. Women will never start protecting men. Women will never stop manipulating men. They will never start having sex for the sake of sex without expecting something in return. Women will never start pumping out one invention and innovation after the next. Women will never take the reigns of civilization and try to propel us all forward. All of that will fall men. And when men manage to succeed, all while women berate and nag them, guess what. We are going to feel damn proud of it. We will smirk and brag about how women can’t do things right. Because it’s fucking true. Giving up our guise of invincibility and allowing our vulnerability to show won’t change women. It will only put us in a worse position

The big problem, for me, in asserting that “all women are evil”, is the ease by which it is done. It is an appeal to emotions. It conversely asserts that “all men are good”.

Occam’s razor can only go so far in simplifying something.

And our “Razor” knows how far we can cut this notion down. And given his (lengthy) response, he has shown us that we should not do this.

Detach your emotions when dealing with women. It was emotionally driven over-simplification by men that allowed for gynocentrism to flourish. We do not need to do the same again. Employ critical thought first, guys. Don’t fall into the trap of black-and-white thinking.

Yes I think men and women can both be evil in different ways. With all due respect, I don’t think it’s quite as equal as you make it out though. You do imply that men are more altruistic and I think that’s true.

The real nub of this issue to me comes down to honesty. It seems to me men can do the self examination necessary to KNOW where our negative traits are and admit them (both to ourselves and our partner) and seek to curb them. Fidelity is the big one here. In spite of men’s notorious high sex drive, women cheat at least as much, probably more than men. I’ve also never heard a man, married or not, deny he’s still attracted to other women, at least on some level. He knows it’s wrong to cheat and that our urges aren’t an excuse.

Conversely, women are now confronted with the ways in which they are evil or how following their urges (like hypergamy) are damaging and exploitative of men. Yet I don’t hear from any women, EVER, about how they are doing the self examination necessary to change. I don’t hear ANY women speaking about their own impulses the way men do and I don’t see any women making any changes in their behavior.

I’m reluctant to label Female Nature “evil” since she may just be acting unconsciously but once she becomes aware of it, if she simply denies it, shifts the blame, plays the victim, blames men, etc (as every woman does) then I DO think we can call THAT evil.

They day you were given access to a keyboard and a blog was a dark day for men. You had me riveted on human nature and then you gave up with “All’s fair in love and war, gents! Don’t be so prideful, guys! Give up your hubris, fellas! Don’t be so judgmental, boys! You’re evil, too! ” WTF!?

You suck! You must really enjoy getting others into buying your misplaced fallacious regressions. Let me lay this out for you so you get it, chief:

Both women and men like a good looking mate. Women dig fit, handsome men. Men dig fit, good looking women. But that’s where the biological similarities end, dumb ass.

Men are superficial where a woman’s looks come into play, but that’s it. Men have no expectation that a woman will provide him resources not earned – nor sacrifice her life when his life is under threat. Women are superficial where men’s looks come into play, but they have the added superficiality of expecting that man either (1) make it easier for her to save money or (2) by virtue of his wealth (or sudden death), make it easier for her to take money (see no-fault divorce). Men didn’t make women this way, DUFUS! It’s been programmed into men that they’re to provide for and protect women, AND STILL RESPECT THEM AS EQUALS AT THE SAME TIME! You don’t get it! The patriarchy is composed of the men at the top – AND IT BENEFITS THE MEN AT THE TOP TO KEEP THE MEN AT THE BOTTOM EITHER DEAD OR POOR. WHY? MORE PUSSY FOR THEM!

For all of time, women have used men to their advantage. For all of time, men with advantage have used men of less advantage to gain advantage with women. When you drive down the road, everything you see was and still is built by men. Now that there’s a way to import cheap foreign manual labor and/or ship traditional male jobs overseas, and now that jobs are more favorable to those that don’t like to muss their hair or break their nails, men find themselves in a bit of a pickle. WHO CREATED THIS ENVIRONEMNT? THE PATRIARCHY in support of the GYNOCRACY! Traditional male jobs have been shipped to male slave labor markets and jobs in the US that men enjoy (STEM) are being increasingly filled by cheaper foreign H1B visa imports – OR GIVEN AWAY TO THE CHINESE AND/OR RUSSIANS. WHO PERFORMS ALL OF THE DECENT, MIDDLE CLASS LABOR JOBS IN THE US NOW? LOW WAGE HISPANIC MEN! WHO THREW MOST MEN UNDER THE BUS? THE PATRIARCHY! FOR WHOM? THE HYPERGYNOCENTRISTS (FEMINISTS)! WHY DID THESE MEN DO THIS? SO THAT THEY COULD BE ELECTED/RE-ELECTED! WHY? THE PATRIARCHY IS THOSE MEN WITH LOTS OF MONEY – AND THEY’RE TERRIFIED THAT WOMEN WILL DEPRIVE THEM OF THEIR MONEY. WHY? POWERFUL MEN WITH MONEY BECOME VICTIMS OF LOWER CLASS MEN WITHOUT MONEY WHEN POWERFUL MEN WITH MONEY LOSE THEIR POWER AND WEALTH BY NOT PLEASING THE GYNOCRACY!

Your little fairy tale on the way the world works doesn’t fool me in the least. I find you deeply simplistic, servile and naive. I’m shocked so many here bought into it already. Get over your women worship and stop filling these guys’ heads with BS that only makes sense to white knights and women, COWARD!

How do men change the balance of power in their favor – now that they’ve been brutalized by the gynocracy and patriarchy for centuries? Never sign the contract that gives women ultimate power to destroy your life. What is that contract? THE MARRIAGE CONTRACT! With each year that passes, ever more misandric polices come into play that redistribute men’s power to woman. What are some examples? The VAWA, Yes Means Yes, SNAP, WIC, Affirmative Action, women only scholarships, alimony, child support (alimony light), Title IX, etc, etc, etc. The list of female friendly – white knight enacted – redistributive programs are endless. These programs, and others like them, are designed to force the patriarchy (men in power) to redistribute most men’s wealth and power to women – through force of federal and state law – THROUGH THREAT OF GUNPLAY AND IMPRISONMENT. The UK is now working on legislation that gives cohabiting women rights to their boyfriend’s assets and income if he breaks up with her! YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS SHIT UP! They call it the “Cohabitation Rights Bill”. “Yes Means Yes” does what all other gynocentrically induced, white knight enforced laws do. What’s that?! IT REMOVES MEN’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND GIVES WOMEN EASY ACCESS TO MEN’S POWER AND WEALTH! How? Through civil suits, the removal of men’s rights to presumption of innocence, the removal of men’s rights to due process and the destruction of the patriarchy (fraternities). What defines the women’s movement? (1) The destruction of the patriarchy, (2) freeing women from the SLAVERY of marriage and (3) women’s sexual liberation. Who are “the patriarchy” women want to destroy? Lower class men. Who are the real patriarchy? Wealthy men, FOOL!

Women are not sugar and spice and everything nice. Women are TRULY EVIL. The atrocities committed against men by the gynocracy and the patriarchy (rich, powerful men) needs to end at the gallows. Your faint hearted, feminine explanation of fairness and equality does the hundreds of millions of destroyed men before you a deep, shameful disservice – FEMINIST!

I think you missed his point, when someone has power without responsibility the person abuses it. With women’s ability to manipulate men, they will go as far as they can to benefit themselves, this is innately human, not just female.

When men no longer give up so much for women gender dynamics will change, likely reversing the laws, or not, its hard to say

Ever hear of women protesting the branding of men as cowards for not going to war for women and women’s children? Know why they don’t? I do.

Marriage, for women, is the most highly paid form of prostitution – Women know this very well. Marriage is the criminal exploitation of men by women. Women get to take the man’s property, his future income, destroy his life and easily move onto the next victim.

“It’s like male psychology is a roof, and women are the rain, and my goal isn’t to keep harping on wet the rain is and whining about all the property damage caused by the wet rain leaking through the roof, I would rather shine a light on the holes in the roof and say “that’s where the leak is””

Agreed. All it takes is for us men to collectively refuse the exploitation to end most this shit. Becoming a MGHOW is a way to directly address and fix those issues in one’s own life. But… like the rain is wet, women are still evil.

Here’s the thing, good/evil is subjective, so when someone says women are evil, or selfish, or dangerous or whatever, basically means “women do things that don’t align with my best interests.”. There is also the issue of empathy, or lack of it. To address that i’ll just copy a comment I made on a recent Stardusk video:

“As I see it the argument that could be made against “human nature is understandable” is: by virtue of being part of an intelligent and conscious species, a person would be expected to have a certain level of empathy for another, to see things through their eyes, and understand the consequences that come from the actions. But the thing is, empathy falls short, since our default state is one of selfishness and self-interest. It is damn hard (not impossible, but hard) to convince anyone to make a sacrifice for the sole benefit of another.”

We can say that women are evil in the sense that they enjoy to see men dying and suffering for them and dispise men that try to protect their life.

The key is that the power of women does not come from their sexual value but from their lies. Her sexual appearance is only a distraction that stops you to see the whole picture.

At the moment that you understand that everything that comes from a woman is a manipulation (benevolent or malevolent, it depends) you get freed from the matrix. There is no such thing as truth of false in the world of women.

Just don’t listen to what women say don’t pay attention to their look (unless you are looking for some sexual prspect). Just go your own way.

This article was too long and not focused. I think we should discuss the nature of evil before we attribute it to anyone. Female nature should be a centrL part of the discourse but I do not think hypergamy is morally evil. Men are suckers and they empower gynocentrism. Let our moral indignation fall on male enablers.

TL;DR women can be evil, but never forget men can be evil tooooooooo. Razorblade (=feminine) logic -> both genders are exactly as evil. Conclusions? 1) If men can’t handle women claiming men being evil, there’s something wrong with the men (as a roof? Wtf?). 2) men can’t ever adress feminine evil, but should introspect forever 3) women aren’t restricted to behave as decent human beings and above rules don’t apply to them, because reasons. Oh, that’s right, sorry, because rain.
Brilliant, RBK.

Reading the comments, a lot of the people seem to be making straw-men, sigh,

Very good article, most of which was already common to me, but very good explanation of such, Though there are neurological difference between men and women, but a lot of that is quite new evidence and not hugely validated

One commenter mentioned the empathy gap, but as described and as the researchers mentioned can likely be explained by environment, maybe not completely, but largely

Ever been fishing? Every fisherman knows the basics. What are those basics? You have to present the lure (often quite elaborate), wiggle it about and, once the fish bites, set the hook and reel it in. Then you just skin it, remove its spine and bake or fry. Fish are consumables.

Fish are fairly innocent creatures. They’re only after one thing. Conversely, the fisherman often go to extreme lengths to catch the fish and go even further to determine the level of life-destruction with which the fish will endure. Will the fish be let go (catch and release) or will the fish get metabolized by the hungry predator?

Finally finished the article. I was worried at first, particularly in lieu of the last article RBK wrote here, that he was advocating a stance of “Men, give up trying to fix your problems and just adopt a victim complex like women do.”

I’m glad to see him take it back to personal responsibility in the end. I wholeheartedly agree that there is nothing you can do (at least not directly) to change other people. You can only control how you choose to act and react to given stimuli (including your own feelings). I still take issue with some of the talking points, but I can definitely agree with the overall message.

This is also possible if they offer SEO as part of their service.
You will also need to delegate your domain name to the hosting space, details on this
are provided by your hosting provider. Just – Host is
loaded with tools that will help you with every need
you have.

Its all very much true , basic facts that men will eventually see . its all a matter of how much crap one is willing to put up with . if the women can do better , they eventually will if just out of boredom.

I say if a man is able to raise a child and wants one then his choice is his own . In saying that and giving our laws it is impossible to adopt alone and highly impossible to succeed in having one out of marriage without suffering and losing custody if not reputation . Marriage is a result of pure Evil jealousy decided upon all men as the price of fornicating , and seen as a security for really only that reason alone its a public I owe you for exclusive rights to a women’s vagina . Never ever can anything Holy be gotten from this discusting, outdated contract. I’m 39 and practice what I believe . I have also refrained from procreating for these very reasons my generation has lived with.

BECAUSE THEY WANT IT HARD NOT STUPID,SELFISH,EMOTIONAL THEY WANT TO TEST MAN AS A MAN NOT AS A CHILD BUT FUCK THAT SHIT I DON’T LOVE WOMEN THAT ARE LIKE THAT BUT I LOVE WOMEN THAT ARE FLEXIBLE SAME LIKE YOU ASKED IN YOUR QUESTION AND I WISH ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THIS AND YOU WOMEN LISTEN TO ME ”STOP!!!! THINKING YOURSELF SMART WE MEN DON’T PLAY GAMES WITH US BECAUSE WOMEN YOU ARE SEXUAL AND COMPLICATED CREATURE ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT GOD CREATED EVE EVE ATE THE APPLE OF GOD THEN SATAN TEMPTED EVE TO EAT OF THIS FRUIT THEN SHE ATE IT!!!!! STUPID EVE FROM THE TREE BECAUSE SHE DIDN’T KNOWED THAT THE FRUIT IS THE FRUIT OF THE DAMN FUCK SHIT DICKHEAD SATAN!!!!!!! AND STOP PLAYING HIDE AND SEEK/TIC TAC TOE GAMES WOMEN WE KNOW VERY WELL WE MEN WE MEN ARE STRONG IN BODY,SPIRIT, AND MENTALLY WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY YOU HAVE TO BE SILENT YEAH!! ITS THE BIBLE WHAT IT SAYS NOT ME I DO SAY IT WE MEN ARE CHOSEN BY GOD YOU WOMEN ARE CHOSEN BY SATAN BY HELL WTF?!? IS WRONG WITH YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE EVIL YES YOU ARE!!!!!!!! AND IF YOU DON’T STOP IT I WILL NEVER TO TALK TO WOMEN FOR MY WHOLE GOD DAMN LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MEN IS WISE MEN IS WISE MEN ARE WISE YOU WOMEN ARE WHAT YOU ARE MONEY SUCKERS BLOOD SUCKERS GOOD SWIPERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU CAN’T CHANGE YOUR SELF BECAUSE ITS THE BIBLE YES THE BIBLE CONTROLS EVERY!! SINGLE!! THING!! ON THE EARTH THE UNIVERSE,AIR,EARTH AND WARS ETC ETC ETC ETC ITS ALL BY GOD AND JESUS CHRIST AND HE IS LETTING TO HAPPEN AND GOING ON BECAUSE HE IS THE CREATOR OF EVERY!!!!!!!!!!!!!THING!!!!!!!!!! YOU UNDERSTAND?!? OR NO?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?!?!?!? YOU WOMEN ARE BLOODY CREATURES BUT GOD IS ABOVE ALL AND HE IS WATCHING YOU ALSO LASTLY!!!! YOU WOMEN SHOULD AND MUST REMAIN SILENT FOREVER FROM NOW TILL THE FOREVERNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN THE NAME OF HOLY JESUS CHRIST SON OF GOD!!! AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ONLY DESERVE TO CLEAN THE HOME NOTHING MORE EAT,SLEEP AND CLEAN ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS YOUR WHOLE LIFE AND AFTER YOU DIE YOU GO TO RED HELL FIRE FOR ETERNITY TO RED HELL FIRE DON’T EVER THINK YOUR ARE SMARTER THAN MEN WE MEN ARE THE BEST WE MADE EVERYTHING ON EARTH WE MADE ROADS,COMPUTERS,TRAFFIC LIGHT,LANES,BUILDINGS,NEW YORK,COUNTRIES,NATIONS,MILITARY,WEAPONS ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC YOU WHAT YOU MADE??!? ONLY PROBLEMS ONLY HEADACHE ONLY GAMES ONLY LOSE ONLY BLOOD SUCKING DICK SUCKING ONLY SHIT AND AIR EATING ONLY SEX,BIG FAKE BOOBS,ASS AND PUSSY PLASTIC SURGERIES ON YOUR LIPS,FACE AND BELLY SHY ON YOUR DAMN FUCKING BLOOD JEALOUSLY SHOW OFF STUPIDITY YOUR BRAINS YOU DON’T GIVE A CHANCE FOR A MAN TO FOCUS CONCENTRATE FROM YOUR BODY WHEN YOU SPEAK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE EMOTIONAL,STUPID,SEXUAL,JEALOUS,SHOW OFF,GREED,VILE AND SNAKE CREATURE AND THE BIGGEST EXAMPLE IS YOUR PUSSY IS THE SHIT BITCH THE BAPHOMET IN YOUR PUSSY SYSTEM MENSTRUATION CYCLE ALL THAT SHIT!!!!!!! IS BY THE DEVIL AND HIS TEMPTATIONS AND ALL THE TEMPTATIONS AND THE MAJORITY OF THEM IS FROM YOU OF THE EVIL SEXUAL WHISPERING SPEAKING,DOING EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!! IS FROM YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD IS EVERYWHERE ANYWHERE HE IS EVEN NEXT TO YOU WATCHING YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMNNNNN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD CURSE YOU GOD FIRE YOU GOD SLAM YOU IN RED HELL FIRE FOREVER FOREVER BITCHES,WHORES,TOTTOS, PROTISUTE,CELEBRITIES IN RED DAMN IT HELL FIRE FOR ETERNITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU DESERVE ONLY SPIT ON YOUR FACE NOTHING MORE THAN THAT FROM THE LAST THE END OF THE SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THATS BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!! THAT’S CRAP SHIT THAT’S FUCKING BIG DICK SHIT ON MY DICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS NOT HUMANITY BUT ITS ANIMALITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS NOT THE WAY OF DEALING WITH MEN LEARN BITCHES LEARN WHORES HOW TO DEAL WITH MEN THEN COME HERE COMMENT WHAT EVER YOU WANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN ON YOUR HEARTS DAMN ON YOUR 60 MILLION TRILLION HEARTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW GREEDY YOU ARE WOMEN HOW VILE YOU ARE WOMEN HOW SELFISH AND STUPID AND IGNORANT YOU ARE AND ARROGRANT SHAME ON YOU SHAME ON THIS ATTITUTE MEN!!!! IS WORKING HARD HIS LOVE HIS EMOTIONS HIS SHIT HIS BALLS HIS MONEY HIS HOME MEN MADE EVERYTHING ON THIS DAMN IT PLANET EARTH HE MADE THE HOUSES VILLIAS THE WEAPONS THE ROADS THE STREETS THE SHOES THE BOATS THE YATCH HE CAN SHAKE MOUNTIANS!!!!!!!!!!!! WITH HIS VOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHEN HE SCREAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE ARE REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU WOMEN ARE WHAT?!?!?!?!? YOU ARE WHAT HUH??!??!??! TELL ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU MADE ONLY PROBLEMS,HEADACHES,DRAMAS,STUPIDITY,DUMBNESS,SEX,PORN AND FUCKACHE FOR THE WHOLE ENTRIE HUMANITY FOR THE SPIRIT FOR THE GOD FOR JESUS FOR EVERYTHING AND WHEN I’M SAY THAT I SAY STRIAGHTY TO HOLY MARY YEAH I SAY IT!!!! BEYOND SHE DON’T HAVE SINS AT ALL TO YOUR SISTERS,YOUR MOTHERS YOUR GIRLSFRIENDS YOUR BITCHES YOUR FEMALE COUSINS YOUR FEMALE GRANDMOTHER YOUR DRAOUGHTER YOUR GRANDMOTHER OF YOUR DAUGHTER AND ALLL ALL ALLL GIRLS AND WOMEN OF THE WHOLE ENTIRE PLANET YOU WOMEN ARE BITCHES BITCHES SLUTS SLUTS WHORES WHORES FORBIDDEN TO YOU TO STAY ON EARTH AND I WISHED GOD HAD REMOVED ARMS FROM WOMEN SO THAT THEY DON’T DO EVIL THINGS ON EARTH TO MEN LIKE THE STORY OF ADAM AND EVE WHEN GOD SAW SNAKE TEMPTING EVE THEN HE GOT MAD ON IT HE TOLD HER ”YOU ARE THE CURSED YOU WILL STAY FOREVER WITHOUT YOUR DAMNS LEGS FROM NOW AND FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” YOU KNOW WHAT I’M SAYING AND MEANING?!? NOW ANSWER ME!!! OR BE SILENT AND WORK AT HOME ONLY CLEAN,SLEEP AND EAT ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUMBER DUMB LADIES AND WOMEN YOU THINK YOU ARE SMARTER THAN US!!!!!!?!??!! YOU ARE NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND YOU WILL NEVER BE BECAUSE GOD CREATED WE MEN IN HIS IMAGE BUT GOD CREATED WOMAN NOT IN HIS IMAGE BUT IN THE IMAGE OF SATAN/DEVIL HIMSELF FROM THE FUCKING SHIT RED HELL FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMEN IN THE NAME OF HOLY JESUS CHRIST THE SON OF ONLY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND YOU WILL NEVER REACH TO HEAVEN NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BUT IN RED HELL FIRE ETHERNITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT YOU DID GOOD TO US WE MEN?!??!?!? AND TO THE MEN SOCIETY EXCEPT SCRAMBLING OF THE SOCIETY WHILE WE MEN WE MADE SUCCESS RICH AND WISENESS ON EARTH WE PREACHED THE GOSPEL YOU WOMEN YOU PREACHED YOUR PUSSIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND ARGUE WITH ME IF YOU ARE A REAL WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE MEN WE CONTROL EVERYTHING THAT WE MADE AND GOD CONTROLS OF WHAT HE CREATED SUCH AS NATURE,AIR,FOREST ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC AND IF THERE IS NO FRESH AIR FOR US FROM YOU WOMEN STOPPING TO BREATH WE WILL HOLD AND SWIPE YOU AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU UNDERSTAND?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!? WE ARE SUPER EXTREMELY SERIOUS CREATURES ON EARTH AND LOOK HOW MANY WORDS I TYPED BUT THIS IS NOTHING THIS IS NOTHING BECAUSE I CAN STILL TYPE TILL 11 IN THE MORNING THAT’S WHY WE ARE HARDWORKING CREATES NOT LIKE LIMITED CREATURES THAT ARE COMPLICATED AND SEXUAL WHICH ARE ADDICTED TO SEX YOU CAN’T TYPE LIKE ME!!!!! YOU CAN’T REACH ME BUT ME I CAN HOLD YOU CATCH FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! STICKABLE AND STUCKABLE BESIDE YOUR DAMN ASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU GET ANGRY WE GET MAD AND CRAZY LIKE A HOT LAVA BURING RED HELL FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ONLY LISTEN,WATCH AND BE SILENT OF US CLEAN THE HOMES AND FUCK YOURSELFS WHICH EACH OTHERS FEMALE-TO-FUCKING-FEAMLE LESBANINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UNDERSTAND?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!? WE ARE SUPER EXTREMELY SERIOUS CREATURES ON EARTH AND LOOK HOW MANY WORDS I TYPED BUT THIS IS NOTHING THIS IS NOTHING BECAUSE I CAN STILL TYPE TILL 11 IN THE MORNING THAT’S WHY WE ARE HARDWORKING CREATES NOT LIKE LIMITED CREATURES THAT ARE COMPLICATED AND SEXUAL WHICH ARE ADDICTED TO SEX YOU CAN’T TYPE LIKE ME!!!!! YOU CAN’T REACH ME BUT ME I CAN HOLD YOU CATCH FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! STICKABLE AND STUCKABLE BESIDE YOUR DAMN ASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU GET ANGRY WE GET MAD AND CRAZY LIKE A HOT LAVA BURING RED HELL FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ONLY LISTEN,WATCH AND BE SILENT OF US CLEAN THE HOMES AND FUCK YOURSELFS WHICH EACH OTHERS FEMALE-TO-FUCKING-FEAMLE LESBANINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANIMALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! & FULLFITS PUSSIES CATS AND SNAKES EVIL SATAN DEVIL ILLUMINATI FREEMASON BLOOD RITUAL CREATURES ARE THE WOMEN FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN RED HELL FIRE LIKE I SAID FOREVER IN ETHERINITY IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST SON OF ONLY BEGGOTEN GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ARE YOU SERIOUS?!?!?!? WOMEN ARE THE COMPLLICATORS OR THE COMPLICATORS JUST THE MOBILE PHONE AND THE CAR WOMEN ALWAYS PLAY GAMES ALWAYS LOVE TO TRAP AND USE AND FIND SEVERAL 100,000000000000000 WAYS TO FAIL AND FALL MEN WITH ANYTHING FROM KNIFE FROM SHOUTING FROM ESCAPING AND MANY MANY OTHER REASON BUT THEY CAN’T BECAUSE MEN IS CHOOSEN BY GOD BUT YOU WOMEN ARE NOT CHOOSEN BY GOD BUT BY FUCK!! BOY!! SATAN THE DEVIL HIMSELF HE WANTS THE AUTHORITY OVER US OVER WOMEN OVER THE EARTH USING LUCIFER’S MANUIPLITION PLAYING WITH US OUR BRIANS LIKE A DOLLS IN THE STAGE FOR THE KIDS WAKE UP WOMEN!!!! WAKE UP hUMANITY!!!!! WAKE UP NATURE!!!!! WAKE UP MEN!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!! FOR GOD AND JESUS CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE MEN WE WILL GO TO SKY BLUE HEAVEN CLOUD ETHERNITY IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST BUT YOU WOMEN YOU WILL GO TO RED HELL FIRE SMOKE BLACK FOREVER ETHERLY BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS AND ITS TRUE JUST LIKE THE ANIMALS!!!!! ANIMALS AIN’T GOT SOULS LIKE HUMANS BUT ONLY FLESH AND GOD IS AGAINST THE FLESH AND BLOOD SO WE WILL BE LIKE THAT IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST SON OF ONLY HOLY BEGOTTEN GOD!!!!!!!! FOREVER ETHERLY AMEN !!!!!!!!

I agree with alot of what you say. You seem to have alot of intuitive ability. I was mostly very good, a very beautiful woman but I didn’t know it, nor did I want to be full of myself. I was humble, loving, honest, selfless, empathetic, thoughtful, grateful etc. I did not care about looks nor money. Also was a devout Christian. Anyone who knew me spoke highly of me and said what a good person I was. And what happened? I came to know that most people aren’t that good. Friends of any gender disappear when you most need them. They betray. And men. My husband became abusive, I divorced. Most men ID meet, even at church, were after sex and would create any type of persona to try to get it. I got my heart broken plenty, got strung along, cheated on, etc. Finally, at 26 I decided that miss good girl is done. I broke up with my bf, quit dating altogether and became an escort. I’ve not looked back. I’ve also met men that have been hurt too many times and that’s why they call escorts. Two bitter cynics having a good time! I’m still somewhat good. I’m pretty altruistic in general and generous. I’m friendly with my clients. But I no longer trust anyone and I like that I now have the upper hand. Men can’t hurt nor disappoint me anymore. Occasionally I find myself getting a bit attached. Miss nice girl wants to come back! Then I slap the bitch in the face and ask her what do you want? Good money or more heartbreak? Then she shuts up😁 we need to just look at each other realistically like you mentioned. Yet when we do,honestly do, were all just a bunch of prostitutes and clients😕😕

I think this is a well written article and I can tell you that society does pressure women to be this way and ive been fighting my gender role socialization all my life. The thing about womens sexuality and them being less interested then men may not be biological, a lot of that is due to the pressure to keep ones legs closed and set a price and when you refuse you are told you are a slut or being used etc. The culture wants to control the person who can have a baby and land the family with a mouth to feed at a young age so females develop a lot of shame around their sexuality. If culture stopped this men would gain some sexual power from women, I know it does not take me long to sleep with a man once I’m with him and I know that’s bc I made an attempt to reject my programming and more women are doing the same now. Some may be holding onto some of the old patterns to get things and also bc they fear how men will view them for liking sex.

Women are not capable of loving men bc men wont let them have enough agency to do so, when women develop the ability to fully love they also have the ability to fully not to and also when women develop fully human men are incapable of loving them. Its a horrible reality but it can be fixed bc reducing how much we add to sex difference and how much we punish similarity can be altered. The tradcon right contribute a lot to magnifying sex differences and putting the sexes on different wave lengths to a degree that separates them from each other and from full humanity as full humanity has enough traits of the other sex to be able to understand them.

I am sorry you have considered that women are evil.
Stereotypes are sometimes useful, but when trying to find the truth, they are rarely so.
There are selfish men and women, no doubt. An evil societal structure encourages and promotes this sort of self-centered, money-loving, fame-desiring attitude.
However, there are also men and women who are not evil, but are misguided – there is a difference between one who knows they are doing wrong and continues to do so, and one who is seeking right but has not found it, and so continues to do what they do not know is ‘wrong’.
Decent human beings are not given as much attention as attention-seeking idiots, so don’t expect to find examples of good men and women in the media.
If we truly want to identify what is evil, then we must be true to our approach – you should consider the significance of operant and classical conditioning – what stories are being sold to the youth?
Even in your own writing, you show your own influenced mindset – holding Pamela Anderson to be a good looking person – does that mean for one to be good looking they must have breast augmentation, botox, fillers and makeup? Must they present themselves in public as they do upon waking? Obviously this is not what is encouraged.

Do not confused what is biologically inherent, with what is the result of schemes constructed by marketers and psychologists and other “experts” over time.

I consider ignorance to be evil – but that’s just me. We each have our own take on it.

Yes. Women are evil. They are the Devil. They are Satan. They are the Dark Forces. The YIN which sucks in sperm (or light) and gives birth. The female reproductive system is symbolised as Jesus on the Cross and Baphomet. (The fallopian tubes are Jesus’ outstretched arms and baphomet’s horns.)Jesus is Satan is Woman. Christmas is all about the family. Family and reproduction is woman’s domain. If you worship Jesus, you worship Satan, you worship woman. The woman in red is the devil, just as Jesus bleeds on the cross, menstruating. Satan is the Princess of Darkness, the black hole of every galaxy in the yoniverse. She is the Matrix, the mother. She is the Great Whore who rides the beast of church and state. She is the dark force that enslaves the light in her system, all circulating around her, sucking in sperm and giving birth. She’s a baby-making machine. The Wheel of Samsara is the Spindle Whorl. The Whore keeps spinning her web of creation like a spider. Fuckin Evil Bitch.

The true love from women is reserved for the child. It’s best to stay a mommy’s boy then? How can that kind of love be found in a girlfriend or wife? Do you not automatically turn beta? Laying on your woman’s breast being cradled in her loving arms. Do not all men in marriage and relationships have a many-angled relationship? Is she your bratty little sister, mother, friend, and sexual outlet all rolled into one? Or is she your enemy? The thorn in your side. The constrictor. The whore turns into a mother. Her priority switches from her lover to her baby. She always desires to have that baby. For what purpose? Just to create more and more of us? Birth, death, the cycle continues, youthful beings replenishing the dying. For what objective? Woman’s purpose is to keep birthing. Her reproductive system rules this earth. This world is run by the mother. The mother is the matrix. The illuminati symbols. All sexual. The one-eye? It’s the pussy. The BLACK LODGE. Females are the black magicians. Men are the forces of light. The snake/cock in her garden/pussy. She continues to eat the fruit (sperm). Why Is the baby in mother’s arms screaming? Was it not heaven to fall sound asleep in mother’s arms? Are we not all submerged in her Milky Way? Blissfully asleep? Is MGTOW an escape from the universe? The mandelbrot figure looks uncannily like a seated buddha. BLACK. It has a shapely ass. Is the buddha female too? Can we transcend the whole universe and all galaxies simply by taking our hands off our dicks and destroying lust for women? For what purpose? Is that the real freedom we want to taste? To not be controlled by woman/the dark forces/satan/the devil/the lady in red/Jesus.

Most of them nowadays do have a very severe mental problem especially when many of us good innocent men will try to start a conversation with them and then they will Curse at us for no reason at all which most of them are real pathetic losers anyway. And i do have to say that the women in the past really did put these women today to real shame altogether as well.

I’m not sure where you get this idea that Men only care about physical appearance and innately lie to get what they want. Those are feminine behaviors, not masculine ones. Men care about personality and honesty, integrity, peace, love, and compassion. What you describes is not men, it’s women in male form, or the victims of this system that gives no hope to decent Men and turns them into pussy beggars. I am a Man, and I have always been a lover with a kind-heart. We are not all frat boys, so I’m not sure why you’re acting as if all, or even most, males behave like that. It’s pretty absurd.