httpd-dev mailing list archives

sorry, i really don't think the vote is about changing context to pool.
the vote is about eliminating a capricious, stupid, and pointless change
between the 1.3 and 2.0 APIs.
my vote is for preserving an existing API, reasonably well documented with
many examples and BOOKS (hey aren't you one of those book authors?)
-dean
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> >
> > As far as I have seen so far, there are about five or six +0s, and two
> > +1s.
>
> I'm -1 on changing the name of our steroidal memory-management
> structure from 'context' to 'pool.' But that's a vote, not a
> veto. Greg has already stated the objections I have to such
> a rename.
> --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar <http://Golux.Com/coar/>
> Apache Software Foundation <http://www.apache.org/>
> "Apache Server for Dummies" <http://Apache-Server.Com/>
> "Apache Server Unleashed" <http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/>
>