Read More

BrightHouse, which provides household goods to customers on hire purchase agreements, has been working with the FCA since 2014 after the watchdog identified the firm's lending assessment and collections processes fell short of its expectations.

The FCA said that the group "did not always deliver good outcomes for customers, particularly those who were at a higher risk of falling into financial difficulty".

BrightHouse - which has stores in Scotland - has "identified customers that may have been treated unfairly where its processes fell short of FCA expectations" and has committed to "putting things right" for these customers.

Where it is determined that customers were not assessed properly at the outset of the loan and may have had difficulty making payments, and providing they handed back the goods, BrightHouse will be paid back the interest and fees charged under the agreement, plus compensatory interest of 8 per cent.

Customers who retained the goods will have their balances written off. This part of the redress totals around £10.1 million for 114,000 agreements entered into between April 1 2014 and September 30 2016, covering 81,000 customers.

Those customers who made the first payment due under an agreement with the firm which was cancelled prior to the delivery of the goods will be refunded by BrightHouse plus receive compensatory interest of 8 per cent.

This redress totals around £4.7 million for 270,000 agreements entered into after April 1 2010 covering 181,000 customers.

BrightHouse will write to all affected customers, some of whom are affected by both sets of circumstances, to explain the refund or balance adjustment that they will receive.

The FCA added that BrightHouse has worked to improve its lending application assessment to ensure that loans are affordable and customers are treated fairly during the collections process, including revising its late payment fee structure.

Jonathan Davidson, executive director of supervision at the FCA, said: "During the time in question, BrightHouse was not a responsible lender and failed to meet our expectations of firms in this sector.

"I am pleased that it has agreed to provide redress to those customers affected by these historic practices.