Subscribe to DailyArt Magazine newsletter

Just enter your e-mail, and we'll let you know when there are interesting art history stories to read.

DailyArt Magazine will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide you with updates, marketing and offers from our partners. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:

Email

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at zuzanna@dailyartmagazine.com. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

A House of Their Own: The Red Rose Girls

In an old house in Philadelphia at the turn of the twentieth century, four women made their home and their art together. Three decades before Virginia Woolf’s seminal essay A Room of One’s Own was published, they had already discovered the secret to a successful artistic career: money and space of one’s own. They were known as the “Red Rose Girls,” a nickname that came from the first house they shared. Separately, they were all talented and distinguished illustrators, but together, they created a collective that was altogether unique.

The names of Violet Oakley, Elizabeth Shippen Green, and Jessie Willcox Smith are rarely remembered these days, but they achieved significant recognition and success in their day. The trio built their lives and careers together, sharing a home for over a decade. Though by no means the only active female artists of the period, they were unique in vowing to put their work – and each other – above all other distractions, including marriage.

Art formed part of a fashionable education for women of the era, but they were expected to pursue marriage rather than a career (or, heaven forfend, both). Higher education, including art education, also enforced gender barriers. The Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art (PAFA) proved a rare exception by allowing gender-segregated life drawing classes – though for the women’s classes, male models remained partly draped for “modesty.” When the artist Thomas Eakins revealed “too much” of a model to one of his classes, he was fired.

Oakley, Green, and Smith all studied at PAFA at various points, but only met in the Drexel Institute drawing class of illustrator Howard Pyle. Illustrations were in high demand for newspapers and periodicals at the time. The “Red Rose” women developed their skills as illustrators to earn commissions that would enable them to support themselves – and in Green’s case, to support her parents as well. Supported by their friends’ feedback and advice, each went on to a successful career in her own distinctive yet interrelated style.

Smith specialized in idealized scenes of children. Many of her drawings appeared in the Ladies’ Home Journal and she illustrated a number of popular books, including Robert Louis Stevenson’s A Child’s Garden of Verses. Green held a lucrative contract with Harper’sMagazine for 20 years, providing them with romantic illustrations of Victorian home life – and, unlike Smith, depicting adults as well as children. Oakley expanded from illustrations into murals, becoming the first American woman to earn a public mural commission when she created a series based on the life of William Penn for the State Capitol building in Harrisburg. The women also occasionally collaborated on pieces together, such as the Bryn Mawr College calendar for 1902-1903.

While the group initially shared an apartment on Chestnut Street in Philadelphia, they moved to the converted Red Rose Inn in Villanova in order to expand their studio space. They were joined in their ménage by Henrietta Cozens, who managed the household for them and became a core member of their group, though not an artist herself.

When they lost that tenancy in 1906, they moved together to a home in Chestnut Hill they called Cogslea, after the group acronym they had coined for themselves – COGS, denoting each of their initials. They even signed their notes and referred to themselves as the “Cogs” family, addressing each other with deep affection.

The group’s intense bond was the source of much speculation. In the Victorian era, “romantic friendships” between women were common, and involved expressing feelings for each other in effusive language. These relationships were not seen as ‘dangerous’ in the way male homosexual relationships were, but contemporary newspaper articles still found it necessary to assure readers that the artists’ lifestyle met the standards of propriety as they had chaperones in the form of Green’s parents.

The Red Rose women were seen as “unconventional,” that curtain-drawing, nose-tapping word for ambiguous relationships – and for women who deviated from any of society’s expectations. What is certain is that the women shared a deep, emotional bond, as evidenced by their pact to live together. Smith and Cozens, the older members of the group, shared a particular attachment to each other that is borne out in their moving and affectionate letters.

In 1911, Elizabeth Green married Huger Elliot after a five-year engagement, and the Cogs family was effectively disbanded. The Philadelphia Press’ report of the marriage was strikingly melancholic for a wedding announcement, reporting that “a note of sadness was felt when the realization came that the trio of artists who had lived and worked together so long would be depleted by the absence of Mrs. Elliot.”

Though their relationships were altered by Green’s absence, they all remained in close contact. In 1914, Oakley took over Cogslea, claiming she needed more space for her mural work. Smith and Cozens continued to live together at a new home on the property – called Cogshill – until Smith’s death. Oakley also found a new companion in younger artist Edith Emerson, who assisted on much of Oakley’s later work and remained with her until Oakley’s passing.

Many biographers gloss over the question of the Red Rose women’s relationships, or at most, suggest that they were based on familial affection expressed in Victorian hyperbole. But, as Alice Carter points out, that reading is most likely another denial of female sexuality – a comparable group of men would not be assumed to be celibate or asexual. In the end, the most relevant question is perhaps to wonder at our own historical prurience, and our ahistorical desire to label distant eras in modern terms. The most important aspect of the Red Rose women’s story is not knowing exactly what kind of relationships they had with each other, but rather learning from the inspiration they shared in their art and the way they lived on their own terms. As one anonymous friend of the group put it so succinctly: “What does it matter if they were orgasmic? The point is that they loved each other.”

Further Reading:

Anne Wallentine is a freelance writer with an MA from the Courtauld Institute of Art. Her art history background also informs her role as a creative director for PR and design projects. She is particularly interested in feminist and queer history, Japonisme in American woodblock prints, the politics of Northern Renaissance portraiture, and tracking down the next best coffee or gin.

If you find any joy and inspiration in our stories,PLEASE SUPPORT DailyArt Magazinewith modest donation. We love art history and we want to keep going with writing about it.

More in Women Artists

Artist

Sometimes it is hard to remember that famous artists were also children at one time, just like all of us. We have selected six of them for you to see how cute they were and to learn a little bit more about their lives! 1. Pablo...

Art State of Mind

Who doesn’t like a cute baby? Lucky for us, history is full of cute babies in art. And while we could dedicate one whole article to the babies in Mary Cassatt’s paintings alone, there happen to be more artists who excelled in this genre. But where...

dailyart

Muḥī al-Dīn Muḥammad was the sixth man to ascend to the Mughal throne and the last of the strong Mughal rulers. He was a notable expansionist under whom the Mughal empire ruled almost all of the Indian subcontinent. On the throne, he was known as Aurangzeb...

dailyart

This is an unusual feature and probably the only one in DailyArt Magazine history that will also come as a surprise to our beloved Editor-in-chief, Dr. Kate Wojtczak. For our readers who may have wondered who keeps the wheels of our magazine turning, meet Kate! She...

dailyart

Ivan VI of Russia (Ivan Antonovich) was the youngest Russian tsar in history. He was proclaimed emperor when only two months old, and his 22-year-old mother, Grand Duchess Anna Leopoldovna, took the title of Regent; but, barely one year of Ivan’s reign had passed before Tsarevna...

DailyArt Magazine’s Mission

We just love art history. You have entered the place where art history gains the voice it deserves. Our mission is to present art history stories in the most compelling and fun way.

DailyArtMagazine.com is your daily dose of beauty and inspiration based on the genius and talent of the great artists of the past. Hope you’re gonna love it!