ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis - that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true. This brand new feature documentary explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government's account. Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Noble Prize winner Dario Fo, the film challenges assumptions surrounding the attacks. In the words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere de da Sera, "What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity." The importance of this film can not be overstated, if its thesis is correct, the justification for declaring the war on terror is built on a series of outrageous lies. Written by Cover Art

Obviously The Most Artful, Soulful 9-11 Film Yet, 20 November 20089/10Author: jesussaddle from United States

When I watched this I was not expecting much, but continued to grow more impressed during my viewing. It is artful; in fact I would even say musical. It has an ebb and flow that, out of the drama, calms the senses and encourages. It also shows the tremendous variety of accomplished, esteemed persons who feel strongly that 9-11 should be given unbiased examination. In fact, the people responsible for this film include members of the European Parliament, and this film was screened at the European Parliament.

On the other hand, when you read an emotional outburst from one of those demanding we not investigate 911, especially commentary from one of those that is inaccurately termed a "film review", you can immediately see through to the malicious intent. It may be nothing more than the desperate, angry refusal to come to know the complicated truths of our modern society, or it may be something else less than honorable. At any rate it is not the least bit open or honest. To believe everything that big corporate media says, or government for that matter, would obviously be stupid, since corporations and governments by their nature have vested interests, and so are in their very essence biased. So that CAN'T be the logical premise these characters who scoff at such films are holding to. What premises they espouse are emotion-oriented and that is hardly capable of stopping the traffic of people waking up to the modern reality of social engineering, conflict instigation, etc. Even if the official story is purposefully flawed to protect incompetence, even that is still enough of a reason to continue to investigate. Some wish to stay behind and avoid the ramifications for now, but with the dramatically unfolding events such as international bank consolidation and market manipulation, a greater number of people are awake and aware now than ever before; just not sure yet how to respond. And that's where films of this quality can help, because this form of creative work is not hostile, but instead is soul searching.

So back to the film. The film starts out from the perspective of a person who lived through it and walked down the stairs through the burning section of the 2nd tower to be struck. It proceeds to cover the vantage of the janitor who had the only key, and who let the firemen up. (This individual witnessed the bombs in the basement, and 20-odd injured but living victims, who were given as names of witnesses, only to never be interviewed).

Following are numerous knowledgeable persons accounts of why the official version of the Pentagon attacks is so problematic, most of which are perspectives we have not seen before.

I can only say, finally, that this is the one documentary that employs enough reserve when presenting information to get home to those unfamiliar with the technical details. It deserves enormous credit for that accomplishment. A great, timely work. Watch and learn.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Franc28 wrote:Cue the cavalcade of Establishment whores elbowing each other to "refute" this movie first.

So far, the establishment whores and US Networks refuse to even acknowledge the existence of this film. No one has tried to refute it. Did you see it? It's very soulful and artful.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Franc28 wrote:Is it out on DVD yet? I don't think watching a movie on Youtube gives it any justice.

Probably it's out somewhere. You can download a torrent of it and burn it onto a DVD. What's wrong with watching it on your computer? It's just as good.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

This is a stupid video. End of story. Into part 3 of the 10 partYouTube crap and this is a stupid amalgam of assinine twoofer claims.

1. The melting of the steel - no images - wonder why?2. Claims of thermate are followed by interview after interview saying thermite. Are these interviews a patch work of nonsense?

PS1. The high sulfur content seen is from the wall board - look up gypsum as a mineral if you don't know.2. The buckle in claim? It's the bow out claim. How did these dunderheads get that wrong?3. The supplied dust was saved for years, not a day or two as you might suppose. How many of you out there save dust?4. Then there is the claim of explosions. When or where? People outside did not hear explosions as the buildings came down. That is when the explosions count. Most of the explosion claims are from earlier, before the collapses. So people are talking about explosions at ground level. Well, look at the videos and see that the buildings collapsed top down. 5. Then there is Willy. It's the Bush presidency. I wonder why there is a photo of him with Clinton, the former first lady? Obviously, nothing. Just another useless photo of a publicity hound. The video says he lost his house filing law suits. It's expensive making filings. Big deal. That means nothing.6. The no-plane claim on the Pentagon is so stupid it I can't believe it. I think these movie knuckle-heads should have interviewed Ace of the "No planes hit the WTC buildings" fame.

I'm only 4 videos in the 10 part series and I'm sleepy. This movie should have been created by that classic comedy group Beyond the Fringe"

well i have just sat and watched all the videos - and i must confess that looking at the way those buildings came down reminded me of a controlled explosion too - and how DO they explain building 7 ?? - it was not hit yet some time later collapses in the same way - as to the pentagon - well if that was a big plane where was the debris ?? planes just don't vaporise

its 5.48 here now so i am returning to bed - but am going to watch the LOT through again later - i think at first viewing there are substantial questions to be answered - i may pick up on more

whatever caused this - a terrible tragedy and a day i like millions will never forget

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

The Professor wrote:I loved the video !!!!!I'm not convinced about the towers but the Pentagon is a BIG PROBLEM !!!!

If you're not convinced about the towers, then see this one. It's the BEST presentation about them that will convince you after you sit through the whole 2 hour presentation by Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org, the most credible 9/11 Truth website made up of 747 professional architects and engineers.

Watch it and you will see why it's irrefutable. Richard Gage is not some whackjob conspiracy theorist like Alex Jones. He is credible, a respected architect, and has a very calm, rational and pleasant personality. If you watch him speak, you'll see why.

That's why he is the only 9/11 Truther so far that was allowed to speak on the mainstream media uninterrupted and without being ridiculed. You can see one of his interviews on FOX news in Fresno, CA here:

At the recent AIA Architects convention, he convinced many architects and engineers about his findings. That means he's no fool.

Here are a list of key reasons why the towers and building 7 fell from controlled demolition, from the AE911Truth.org site:

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.1.

Slow onset with large visible deformations2.

Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)3.

Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel4.

High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

BTW, here's a great news story I just found on Russia Today about Richard Gage and his quest at the AIA Convention to promote 9/11 Truth. Check it out.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Nostradamus wrote:This is a stupid video. End of story. Into part 3 of the 10 partYouTube crap and this is a stupid amalgam of assinine twoofer claims.

1. The melting of the steel - no images - wonder why?2. Claims of thermate are followed by interview after interview saying thermite. Are these interviews a patch work of nonsense?

PS1. The high sulfur content seen is from the wall board - look up gypsum as a mineral if you don't know.2. The buckle in claim? It's the bow out claim. How did these dunderheads get that wrong?3. The supplied dust was saved for years, not a day or two as you might suppose. How many of you out there save dust?4. Then there is the claim of explosions. When or where? People outside did not hear explosions as the buildings came down. That is when the explosions count. Most of the explosion claims are from earlier, before the collapses. So people are talking about explosions at ground level. Well, look at the videos and see that the buildings collapsed top down. 5. Then there is Willy. It's the Bush presidency. I wonder why there is a photo of him with Clinton, the former first lady? Obviously, nothing. Just another useless photo of a publicity hound. The video says he lost his house filing law suits. It's expensive making filings. Big deal. That means nothing.6. The no-plane claim on the Pentagon is so stupid it I can't believe it. I think these movie knuckle-heads should have interviewed Ace of the "No planes hit the WTC buildings" fame.

I'm only 4 videos in the 10 part series and I'm sleepy. This movie should have been created by that classic comedy group Beyond the Fringe"

cheers

Sounds like you're in denial and refuse to look at all the evidence. Where is the evidence for the officlal story and why do you defend it as gospel truth? Simply because it's "official"? Gee that's critical thinking, NOT!

Watch the 9/11 Blueprint for Truth video I linked above.

There is no proof that a plane hit the Pentagon. No debris, no video, etc. People who believe the official version do so on faith only.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

brett wrote:well i have just sat and watched all the videos - and i must confess that looking at the way those buildings came down reminded me of a controlled explosion too - and how DO they explain building 7 ?? - it was not hit yet some time later collapses in the same way - as to the pentagon - well if that was a big plane where was the debris ?? planes just don't vaporise

its 5.48 here now so i am returning to bed - but am going to watch the LOT through again later - i think at first viewing there are substantial questions to be answered - i may pick up on more

whatever caused this - a terrible tragedy and a day i like millions will never forget

The official explanation of Building 7 is that fires brought the building down. The fires were started by falling debris from the WTC, which hit some gas tanks in Building 7 and ignited fires that burned for 7 hours. However, the problem is that fires have NEVER EVER collapsed a high rise steel structure before, and in theory it's extremely unlikely to, no matter how long it burns. But the government can't think of any other explanation. They had NIST do a long study on it. A whistleblower named Kevin Ryan came out saying that NIST committed fraud in manipulating their data. They were not able to get the realistic computer simulation program to re-create what happened to Building 7 with fires, so they changed the program dishonestly. For exposing NIST, he was fired. So much for truth.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

BTW, check out this radio interview with Kevin Ryan. Apparently, he already got his papers about thermite and explosive residue found in the WTC dust, published in THREE mainstream peer reviewed scientific journals!

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

well i have just sat and watched the whole 2 hour presentation and frankly i am deeply SHOCKED !! - i like many wondered why the towers fell - but dint have the knowledge in depth to piece it all together - that video did just that - the fire stuff - yes i understood immediately - but there is soo much more there - so so much more - the implications of which make the x-files plots look like kiides comic book stuff

after watching that - i would opine that some bastards ( and i make no apologies about using this word ) - engineered the whole thing - those buildings where dropped with NO regard for human life - the subsequent attacks by the military of both america and the UK where done based on this lie

i will have to think some more on who and what motive was behind this ( motive is easy - money somewhere along the line ) as to the WHO ?? - how far does it go ??

any one who is too lazy to watch this video or too stupid to see the implications - would be unwise to opine here in my view - they cant debunk this evidence - but they will try of course - the question you ALL now have to ask yourself is just how "expendable " you are ??