Thought of that one too, as it does look like rain, but the object looks too dense, and well shaped...especially given the surrounding clouds...even
if higher... could just be a lone fluke cloud though....

sorry but found it in brazilian but i goes about an anomyous person
which has taken a photo with his celularphone. will try to find it in english

but is this a fake or is it real?

I'm sure it was taken and it is a picture of something,But what? I don't know. you can't say that as big as the universe id that the
isn't something out there somewhere. We are not the only ones! We can't be! We need to keep exploring and keep looking beyond the stars. There are
so many things we have learned from Space Travel and so many more things to learn.

UFO photographed with cellular the consultant of Magazine UFO Cláudio Brazil, from São Paulo, received for email the story from avistamento from a UFO
in the Anhanguera Highway, in that State, occurred in 03 of August, for return of 15h00. Three witnesses passed through for the road and had stopped
the car to see better. Two of them had jumped one surround to arrive next, being that one of them made a photo of the strange object with its cellular
one.

This is a case rare - perhaps unknown - of an image of a presumption UFO to have been gotten with the use of a cellular one. The youngsters had
informed that they were close to Rita Saint it Passa Quatro (SP) when turn an object in form cigar on the weeds. He was sufficiently distant and he
seemed to leave a dust the ground below of it. The UFO was motionless in the biggest part of the time, and 0ccasionally it made small movements for
front and it stops backwards. He made racket as if they were of "some machines functioning together", according to deposition.

The same witnesses had looked for, in 04 of August, the Periodical of the Band, the Net Bandeirantes de Televisão, and had the same given to
deposition to the journalist Robert Cabrini. The production of the program bound and asked for then that the publisher of Magazine UFO, J. Gevaerd,
commented the case in the edition of that night of the periodical. During the story of the witness, who does not want to identify itself, it esteem
that the object was to about 10 distance km - fact that is perhaps maken a mistake, as shows to the image, making look like the object to be well
next.

The youngsters had observed presumption UFO for about 30 minutes and later they had been even so. The case is under inquiry and the image will be
analyzed by experts of the Brazilian Center of Research of Discos Voadores (CBPDV).

Digital cameras, have the possibility of captioning things, that vibrate higher that our visual frequencies. In this particular case, weather
conditions, sun radiation levels, actually permited also, that human eyes could see that Object!

To those that Believe: It's one of the so called MultiDimensional Ufos. This time they weren't lucky , and got caught.... "doing something" to the
crops!!!!

Digital cameras, have the possibility of captioning things, that vibrate higher that our visual frequencies. In this particular case, weather
conditions, sun radiation levels, actually permited also, that human eyes could see that Object!

To those that Believe: It's one of the so called MultiDimensional Ufos. This time they weren't lucky , and got caught.... "doing something" to the
crops!!!!

» Listen DarkSIde, English is not my root language, so probably i couldn't spell the proper expression.

»» SOUND, LIGHT, THOUGHT; they are all manifestations of phenomenons that Vibrate at different specters.

Human vision has a certain specter (range), or frequency. You can't see at night, as good as you can see what surrounds you at mid-day. Are you
following me?

Cats, for example, have a very clear sight , even in the darkest night, with no moonlight or whatsoever. Studies on cats, gave us the information
about how good is their vision at night. Comparing with Human vision, a cat in the absolute darkness, can see as good as a human can , during the end
of the day( 20 minutes after the sunset).

»Now, using a Digital Lens, if we don't use flash, to obtain a certain level of Light (vibration), most of the times the image will be too dark,
because common lens have a wide specter of captioning Light, at a higher vibration, than our organic human lens (eyes).

Thus, knowing this, ... it actually means very much, what i tried to explain!

Originally posted by HARAK
» Listen DarkSIde, English is not my root language, so probably i couldn't spell the proper expression.

»» SOUND, LIGHT, THOUGHT; they are all manifestations of phenomenons that Vibrate at different specters.

Human vision has a certain specter (range), or frequency. You can't see at night, as good as you can see what surrounds you at mid-day. Are you
following me?

Cats, for example, have a very clear sight , even in the darkest night, with no moonlight or whatsoever. Studies on cats, gave us the information
about how good is their vision at night. Comparing with Human vision, a cat in the absolute darkness, can see as good as a human can , during the end
of the day( 20 minutes after the sunset).

»Now, using a Digital Lens, if we don't use flash, to obtain a certain level of Light (vibration), most of the times the image will be too dark,
because common lens have a wide specter of captioning Light, at a higher vibration, than our organic human lens (eyes).

Thus, knowing this, ... it actually means very much, what i tried to explain!

Cya all later!

HARAK.

Ok I understand what you mean,it's called wavelength
the human eye can see from violet to red (I don't know the exact frequencies) but can't see Infrared or Ultraviolet.Same for cats they see the same
wavelengths as us,but they have a pupil that can widen much more than ours,therefore capturing much more light,and they have a reflective membrane in
the eye sending even more light to the retina,allowing them to see in the dark,but cats don't see infrared or ultraviolet,altough they have a better
vision due to their eyes.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.