Something I am wondering about in regards to revisionist estimations on the number of Jewish deaths during the second world war which are mostly attributed to typhus, occasional singular executions for crimes and the likes, starvation after supply cuts near the end of the war etc but do any of these estimates account for Jews who may have died in combat? When you think of how much Europeans died during the war, I think it could be plausible that a couple million or so of the "established historian figures" at least could be attributed as combat casualties, either accidental civilian deaths, partisans or enlisted combatants. I mean it's a bit overtly arrogent for them to claim their six million figure as being victim only and that none of them were involved in fighting, or dying in any way that millions upon millions of Europeans were as results of bombing, or the other general ways in which people die during a war.

I'm not asking for a debate or anything, just other peoples opinions on something I have been theorising over. I'm not an expert on the subject so...

Oh sure there were Jews fighting, even on the right side. The same media that screws us over is screwing them over, and like us, they had real heroes fighting who they'll probably never know about, and they'd be shamed for trying to pay respects to them the same way we are. They can't hold up the guy who died protecting a church full of women from the Reds, or the guy who marched bravely to his death in Stalingrad to protect Europe from the Jewish led Bolsheviks, or the guy who thwarted a communist "freedom fighter" partisan attack on a hospital...it would counter their propaganda. Probably their own families were told those kinds of men "died in the Holocaust".