And the fact that you think that people who are circumcised have "reduced functionality" is just ridiculous.

Please explain why it is off. Remember that the primary purpose of that argument was to suggest that the two reasons he had provided in support of circumcision worked just as well for a pinky finger, and yet he considers removing a pinky finger to be ridiculous.

What would you call removing hundreds of nerve endings that compliment the function of the penis? Reduced functionality seems like a perfectly accurate description to me.