Nothing much listed from the State Department for Oct 2013 thru June 2014.

In contrast, the State Department has many admissions from African nations like Somalia at 7608, Sudan 2160, The Congo 2563.

Hardly a whisper about that a year ago either.

What is the Agenda with all this ?

According to refugee data from the U.S. Department of State, the federal government did not grant refugee protection to a single person from
Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador or Mexico in fiscal year 2013.

Now, almost all of the unaccompanied children illegally crossing into the U.S. from Mexico are coming from those nations, and House Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi and other congressional Democrats have described these illegal aliens as “refugees.”

In the seven fiscal years from 2007 through 2013, a mere five Guatemalans and 25 Hondurans were granted refugee status in the United States. During
that time, zero citizens of El Salvador or Mexico were granted refugee status despite increased violence in those countries in recent years.

a reply to: xuenchen Yep, refugee crises are something that happen in other parts of world, not right here. So the zero
refugees. Latinos from Cuba? Sure they're fleeing communism. From Somalia? Sure, they're fleeing Al Qaeda. But from central America? Why thats an
area not aligned with Putin or the middle east. We pay them no heed. What, hundreds of thousands of them seeking asylum? Quick, everybody look at the
middle east and Ukraine! Nothing to see here!

I've heard people here say that this whole thing is a ploy by the PTB, but I think the PTB would rather we all look away, and not look at the messed
up situation in our own back yard.

By calling them "Refugees" it puts this manufactured fiasco into the hands of the UN's laws! As most of us already know, Obama has a habit of trying
to circumvent our Constitution and Sovereignty by using the UN.

Anyhow, here is an interesting find from the " Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ".

21.
In most refugee situations, protection space is not static, but expands and contracts periodically according to changes in the political, economic,
social and security environments. This process cannot be measured with any degree of scientific precision, but can be assessed in a qualitative manner
on the basis of certain indicators. These include the extent to which refugees:
•
are threatened (or not) by refoulement, eviction, arbitrary detention, deportation, harassment or extortion by the security services and other
actors;
•
enjoy freedom of movement and association and expression, and protection of their family unity;

• have access to livelihoods and the labour market and are protected from exploitative treatment by employers, landlords and traders;
•
enjoy adequate shelter and living conditions;
• are able to gain legal and secure residency rights and are provided with documentation;
• have access to public and private services such as healthcare and education;
•
enjoy harmonious relationships with the host population, other refugees and migrant communities; and,
•
are able to benefit from the solutions of voluntary repatriation, local integration and resettlement.

So as you can see what might seemed like a good thing to protect refugees, has been perverted into not only a way for our current POTUS to thumb his
nose at our "current" immigration laws" but also, IMO a legal "by globalist standards" way to implement Cloward and Piven and cover his sorry ass from
any form of prosecution for willfully violating our laws.

originally posted by: tridentblue
a reply to: xuenchen Yep, refugee crises are something that happen in other parts of world, not right here. So the zero
refugees. Latinos from Cuba? Sure they're fleeing communism. From Somalia? Sure, they're fleeing Al Qaeda. But from central America? Why thats an
area not aligned with Putin or the middle east. We pay them no heed. What, hundreds of thousands of them seeking asylum? Quick, everybody look at the
middle east and Ukraine! Nothing to see here!

I've heard people here say that this whole thing is a ploy by the PTB, but I think the PTB would rather we all look away, and not look at the messed
up situation in our own back yard.

If Putin isn't aligned with Latin America why is he going there after he leaves Cuba?
It sounds like a variation of the movie Red Dawn.
Either that or Putin is going to pay the coyotes to move some troops for him.
Meanwhile Obozo and company still say the border is secure.

Thank you for taking the shoe leather express towards a better Democracy. I hope we had provided enough food and shelter kiosks along your journey.
Your new last name in Baloney. You will be screened and given adequate medical treatment as well as an all expense paid trip to the location of your
choosing! Oh by the way, vote Democrat!

Next!

If its a better Democracy they're looking for, then they found it. It's better at making the slave feel so free. It's better at stealing and making us
feel fat. It's better at promising opportunity and then rewarding those who don't deserve it. We in America are just bank accounts for the foreign
policy empire. Every country we try and help build, we put keystones in the whole government and economic structure. Then we play them like a game of
Jenga, pulling out as many pieces as we can until it's almost ready to fall. Create a civil war and that country will remove the last few pieces
holding it together itself. We move in and clean up the mess.

If something nefarious wasn't going on, it wouldn't be so hard to get information, and what little information we are allowed to have seems to not
be based on actual facts.
I am most curious as to the true reasons for the sudden influx, along with the red carpet treatment. My gut tells me this may be the most monumental
event since 911 as far as changing the way Americans live.
I really appreciate your skills of ferreting out information, xuenchen!

(Maybe it's time to stop referring to TPTB as 'the government' and start calling them 'The Borg'.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.