CALL 1-888-510-BABY or click on the picture on the left, if you gave birth or are about to and can't care for your baby, to give your baby to a worker at a nearby hospital (some states also include police stations or fire stations), NO QUESTIONS ASKED. YOU WON'T GET IN ANY TROUBLE or even have to tell your name; Safehaven people will help the baby be adopted and cared for.

Friday, December 15, 2006

If some EC = 5 x OC, and OC = 4 to 8 x HRT, and HRT = More Breast Cancer, Then What?

Doctors estimate that half of women who were taking hormones [HRT] stopped after July 2002, when the federal women's Health Initiative study was halted because more women taking estrogen/progestin pills [my emphasis] developed breast cancer or heart problems...Cases declined most among women 50 and older, with [BC] tumors whose growth is fueled by estrogen [my emphasis] -- the age group and type of cancer most affected by hormone use.

We wrote in March 2006, quoting Canada's CBC News, about the W.H.O. group, the IARC:

In 2005, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer re-classified certain oral contraceptives [OC, or The Birth Controll Pill] as carcinogenic to humans with slightly increased risks for cervical, liver and breast cancer. While the overall benefits of oral contraceptives may be beneficial, it concluded, more study is needed.

"It is important to recognize that the dose of estrogen used for postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy is substantially less than that used in oral contraception, taking into account the different potencies of the drugs normally employed in the two settings."

That's from a 1996 book by Goodman and Gilman, The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 9th ed.

Modern forms of the birth control pill contain, on a cyclical basis, between 30 and 40 mcg (micrograms) of ethinyl estradiol.

At least the Product Information in 2002 for Triphasil 28 does, and that's what I used until I stopped taking it around 2002 or 2001. That or its generic version was the most popular Pill Pack for many years, in my understanding as a longtime user of the pills.

Stated another way, the average dose of hormone in the birth control pill is, conservatively, four times stronger per dose than HRT. In the extreme (based upon the lowest strength comparison of ethinyl estradiol of 5mcg), the birth control pill is eight times stronger per tablet than a dose of HRT. [my emphasis]

It's true that this international group of pharmacists calls themselves Pharmacists for Life International, but John Wilks, who wrote that HRT/OC paper and has authored a book on this subject, did already have his Bachelors of Pharmacology, Masters of Pharmaceutical Sciences, and an M.A. in Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, and has had a pretty respectable career in the business of doing pharmacological work and part-time teaching at the U of Sydney Australia.

Folks may dismiss him and the PFLI, if they want. No matter. Disbelief doesn't make their credentials or their science any less valid.

If you want the eye-glazing but understandable pharmacological detail, please do read the entire two page document linked to. But what all this tells us is this:

If HRT hormones "fuel" breast cancer, then modern oral contraceptives just might have four to eight times that fueling effect, and some EC pills can be as bad.

Astoundingly, the researchers actually concluded this did not at all mean that increased use of EC was "associated with more unprotected intercourse." Yet in the study, six more teens with easy access used EC after sex and, as a group, used it on fourteen more occasions of sex in six months. To say it isn't from unprotected sex, the researchers seem to assume that, instead, 14 condoms broke among 6 different teens in 6 months' time. This is questionable at best.

And an admitted limitation of their study, according to Medscape, is "reliance on self-reported behaviors." How many women report our age or weight truthfully? Do we honestly believe that "predominantly minority, low-income, sexually active adolescent women, aged 15 to 20 years" (the study's subjects) or any women this age are likely to report--to adult researchers--100% of their sexual activities?

Another limitation of the study was "lack of generalizability beyond urban, predominantly minority, low-income young women and to women who are not sexually active." Yet The Associated Press, CBS and many others generalized away to apply this study to the all-encompassing "teenagers" everywhere.

Society easily could become like Bangkok (see the PLAN B link given above), which has already reached a point where women are taking EC in doses that, over a month's or year's time, gives them the same or worse total doses in their bodies as we'd get from daily smaller doses.

Which are carcinogenic and "fueling growth" of breast cancer.

When are we women going to demand better of our own doctors, the medical community, and the FDA?

"After Abortion,...run by Emily Peterson and Annie Banno, two women who had abortions in the 1970s, ...tries to avoid the political tug-of-war that tends to come with this turf. They concentrate instead on discussing the troubling personal effects of abortion on the mothers." ~ Eric Scheske, Godspy contributing editor, in NC Register's "Signs of Life in the Blogosphere", 2/2006

POST-ABORTION help:

"I would now like to say a special word to women who have had an abortion...[many are] aware of the many factors which may have influenced your decision and [do] not doubt it was a painful and even shattering decision. The wound in your heart may not yet have healed. Certainly what happened was and remains terribly wrong. But do not give in to discouragement and do not lose hope. Try rather to understand what happened and face it honestly. If you have not already done so, give yourselves over with humility and trust to repentance. The Father of mercies is ready to give you his forgiveness and his peace...You will come to understand that nothing is definitively lost and you will also be able to ask forgiveness from your child..."

PREGNANT & need help?

ABORTION PUNDIT blog: &nbsp&nbsp The "sibling" blog to After Abortion (discussing politics, law, morality, debate, including a HUGE sidebar of links by group/demographic/ community/science/you name it, on all life-issues)

FREEDOM OF RELIGION, FREEDOM OF SPEECH, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS NOTICES: From its inception in 2003 forward, the postings on this site are the co-bloggers' own personal opinions, observations and research, do not reflect or represent the views of any employer(s), past, present or future, nor do/will they relate in any manner to said employer(s) or their businesses at any point in time. The writings expressed herein are protected expression by virtue of the First Amendment of the United States of America and by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in particular Articles 18 and 19, signed by the U.S.A. in 1948:

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of the physical, emotional, social and spiritual negative effects of abortion on women, men and families, and to provide resources for help and information to anyone experiencing these effects or trying to help those who are. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit or compensation of any kind.