The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds DirectlyFrom The Open And Publicly Available NewsgroupSci.Electronics.Design

This Group And Thousands Of Others Are AvailableOn Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.

Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any OtherNewsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup AndPosts Are For Informational Purposes Only.

From: chris@dd5hotmail.com (Chris)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.misc
Subject: Re: Reducing contact resistance for low volt use?
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 21:00:47 GMT
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID:
References: <3df66fb5.14200838@news.pipeline.com> <3df68c6f.21555882@news.pipeline.com> <3e190f7b.3476211@news.pipeline.com>
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
In article , You can't see me, and I pass right through planets... wrote:
>>These people are building robots that are designed to DESTROY each other.
>>And you're concerned about sticking to mfg's specs? I don't think the
>>motors they use are designed to be sawed through or smashed by hammers
>>either. The money involved obviously makes the batteries and motors
>>disposable items. If your robot is designed to last for years, then you'll
>>probably lose the battle.
>>
> That is an interesting conflict you have set before yourself.
>
> Better is NOT better? Are you reading this crap before you post it?
If you built an Indy car engine to last 100,000 miles, I doubt it would win
many races. Your definition of "better" is too limited. And what *is* your
problem anyway? I've never seen someone so flame-happy.
Chris