SUBSCRIBE:

Opposition leader arbitrarily arrested in Equatorial Guinea

Share

(Human Rights Watch/IFEX) - 6 December 2012 - The most recent arbitrary detention of a leading opposition politician in Equatorial Guinea on December 4, 2012, raises concerns about human rights conditions in the lead-up to legislative elections in the first half of 2013, EG Justice and Human Rights Watch said today. Since November 2011, the government has detained at least four high-profile members of the country's beleaguered political opposition.

At 9:00 a.m. on December 4, 2012, Daniel Darío Martínez Ayécaba, the head of the opposition Unión Popular (Popular Union) party, was arrested without a warrant at the Malabo airport as he prepared to leave for Madrid to attend a conference hosted by an opposition group based in Spain. Darío told EG Justice, which presses for human rights and rule of law in Equatorial Guinea, that he was taken to the Malabo central jail known as “Guantánamo” for questioning. Darío was released conditionally at 3:00 p.m. but the authorities confiscated his passport, ordered him to report to security officials daily, and forbade him to leave the city.

“Harassing opposition figures is no way to build confidence that the upcoming elections will be fair,” said Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “The timing raises concerns that the government is attempting to further weaken the opposition ahead of the legislative elections.”

Although a date for legislative elections has yet to be announced, the government has indicated that they are expected to take place in early 2013. They should in any case occur by mid-year, under legal requirements that they take place every five years. The current parliament was elected in May 2008.

The country's opposition holds just one out of 100 seats in the parliament, known as the House of Representatives. Constitutional changes approved in November 2011 call for the creation of a bicameral parliament, with the addition of a 75-member Senate. President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo will directly appoint 15 of its members.

The detention of Darío occurred just weeks after the illegal detention of Fabián Nsue Nguema, a prominent and respected human rights lawyer who is also active with an opposition party. Nsue previously served as secretary-general of the Popular Union party. He also has frequently defended opposition politicians in court.

Earlier in 2012, Dr. Wenceslao Mansogo Alo, a medical doctor, human rights defender, and leading member of the opposition Convergence for Social Democracy (CPDS) party, was convicted in a politically motivated trial. He was freed in June after receiving a presidential pardon. But he remains subject to penalties, including a five-year suspension of his medical license and substantial fines, which he is appealing.

One of Mansogo's lawyers, Ponciano Mbomio Nvó, was suspended from legal practice in April for two years for arguing that Mansogo's case was politically motivated. Like Nsue, Mbomio has often defended jailed political opponents, but he cannot do that now due to the suspension. Mbomio filed a complaint with the International Association of Lawyers, seeking reversal of the suspension order, which was imposed by Equatorial Guinea's lawyers association.

Opposition politicians in Equatorial Guinea have previously faced harassment prior to important political moments. Marcial Abaga Barril, the CPDS representative on the national electoral body in 2011, was detained without a warrant outside of his home, allegedly in connection with a murder investigation, in November 2011. He was released three days later, without charge.

Abaga's arrest and detention occurred just days after the start of campaigning for a Nov. 13 referendum to approve constitutional changes proposed by President Obiang's government, which Abaga's party had strongly opposed.

“The Obiang government's pledges to respect human rights ring hollow in the face of ongoing abuses,” said Tutu Alicante, the director of EG Justice. “This latest arrest calls into question the government's commitment to undertake the genuine reforms that are so badly needed in Equatorial Guinea.”

After already cracking down on freedom of information in recent years, President Erdoğan has taken advantage of the abortive coup d’état and the state of emergency in effect since 20 July to silence many more of his media critics, not only Gülen movement media and journalists but also, to a lesser extent, Kurdish, secularist and left-wing media.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

“After the initial optimism during the Euromaidan movement, many journalists have become disillusioned. They are faced with the triple challenge of the war in the Eastern part of the country, the economic crisis and the digitalization of mass media.”

An officer of the Myanmar army recently filed a criminal complaint against two journalists for allegedly sowing disunity among the military. Even though mediation by the Press Council caused the military to withdraw the case, this incident demonstrates how the military continues to throw its weight to get back at what it perceives as negative publicity.

The government uses draconian laws such as the sedition provisions of the penal code, the criminal defamation law, and laws dealing with hate speech to silence dissent. These laws are vaguely worded, overly broad, and prone to misuse, and have been repeatedly used for political purposes against critics at the national and state level.

In recent years, the space afforded to civil society to operate freely has been shrinking dramatically across the world, presenting a serious threat to democracy and human rights. Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) have been especially badly affected by this shrinking political space.

The report is a frank assessment of the recent regime of online censorship and mass surveillance against a backdrop of longstanding, serious abuses of the judicial process and attacks on freedom of expression by Turkish authorities.

The report surveys the rocky landscape for media and public discourse since the ruling military junta lifted the curtain on the southeast Asian nation in 2012 after five decades of isolation from the modern world.

With the environment now recognized as a major challenge for humankind, Reporters Without Borders believes that particular attention should be paid to the journalists who take greats risk to investigate sensitive, environment-related subjects. The report highlights a steady deterioration in the situation for environmental reporters, who are increasingly exposed to many kinds of pressure, threats and violence.

The Pakistani government has significantly expanded its communication interception activities. This Privacy International report covers the intelligence services plan to capture all IP-traffic in Pakistan and other initiatives, pointing to gaps in the laws governing surveillance.

The need to regulate the transfer of surveillance technologies that pose a risk to human rights has been largely recognised by EU institutions and some EU member states. It is no longer a question of if the EU should do more in this area, but how.

Defamation and insult remain criminal offences in Portugal punishable by up to two years behind bars despite the fact that a number of international human rights bodies have found criminal defamation to be a disproportionate restriction on freedom of expression.

Despite its Constitutional commitment to free speech, India’s legal system makes it surprisingly easy to silence others. Routine corruption, inefficiency, and the selective enforcement of vague and overbroad laws allow individuals, or small groups, to censor opinions they find distasteful. - See more at: http://www.pen-international.org/the-india-report-executive-summary-and-key-findings/#sthash.TIIM2xbu.dpuf

Press freedom in the Philippines continued to be under attack from 2014 to 2015. The killing of journalists is continuing, with four journalists killed from May 2014 to May 2015. The trial of the accused masterminds of the Ampatuan (Maguindanao) Massacre and their supposed henchmen is continuing, but with a primary accused was released, while a witness in the same case was killed.

The year 2014 saw Malaysians standing up to exercise the rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution, including freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. This continues a growing trend of facing up to state oppression. Unfortunately, this has been met with increasing repression. Malaysia has seen a concerted crackdown on the freedom of expression in the year 2014, which has escalated even further in 2015.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.