Ross Douthat explains the situation to liberal ‘c’atholic academics.

Ross Douthat is not lying down and letting the effete liberal catholic academic mafia kick him.

He has declared war.

Rather, perhaps he has openly stated that a state of war does in fact exist – he didn’t start it – and that he, for one, is not fleeing the field.

Douthat, a Catholic and a writer for the New York Times (Hell’s Bible) gave his view of matters concerning the Church today and the recent Synod of Bishops and the catholic Left had a spittle-flecked nutty. Many catholic lefties signed a common letter in which they whined to the NYT about how Douthat shouldn’t be allowed to express his opinions in public. Their claim was that Douthat isn’t qualified to have a valid opinion because he is not, like they are, academicians, with, you know, degrees. (“Doctor Science! He knows more… than you do!” HERE)

The libs were, of course, angry that Douthat’s opinions were well-reasoned and, well, right. They react poorly to being suddenly exposed to light, and tend to run around a bit. HERE

Not long after that bitchy letter from the effete catholic Left, Douthat gave a talk for a First Things event, which is on video. HERE

Now, he has issued another opinion piece in the NYT. HERE It’s a masterpiece.

Letter to the Catholic Academy

MY dear professors!

I read with interest your widely-publicized letter to my editors this week, in which you objected to my recent coverage of Roman Catholic controversies, complained that I was making unfounded accusations of heresy (both “subtly” and “openly”!), [LOL!] and deplored this newspaper’s willingness to let someone lacking theological credentials opine on debates within our church. I was appropriately impressed with the dozens of academic names who signed the letter on the Daily Theology site, and the distinguished institutions (Georgetown, Boston College, Villanova) represented on the list.

I have great respect for your vocation. Let me try to explain mine. [Break it down for them Barney style, Ross. It might penetrate.]

A columnist has two tasks: To explain and to provoke. The first requires giving readers a sense of the stakes in a given controversy, and why it might deserve a moment of their fragmenting attention span. The second requires taking a clear position on that controversy, the better to induce the feelings (solidarity, stimulation, blinding rage) that persuade people to read, return, and re-subscribe.

I hope we can agree that current controversies in Roman Catholicism cry out for explanation. And not only for Catholics: The world is fascinated — as it should be — by Pope Francis’ efforts to reshape our church. [Undeniable.] But the main parties in the church’s controversies have incentives to downplay the stakes. Conservative Catholics don’t want to concede that disruptive change is even possible. [Naive.] Liberal Catholics don’t want to admit that the pope might be leading the church into a crisis. [Blind.]

So in my columns, I’ve tried to cut through those obfuscations toward what seems like basic truth. There really is a high-stakes division, at the highest levels of the church, over whether to admit divorced and remarried Catholics to communion [NB] and what that change would mean. In this division, the pope clearly inclines toward the liberalizing view and has consistently maneuvered to advance it. At the recent synod, he was dealt a modest but genuine setback by conservatives.

And then to this description, I’ve added my own provoking view: Within the framework of Catholic tradition, the conservatives have by far the better of the argument. [And the catholic Left knows that, which is what fills them with rage.]

First, because if the church admits the remarried to communion without an annulment — while also instituting an expedited, no-fault process for getting an annulment, as the pope is poised to do — [then] the ancient Catholic teaching that marriage is “indissoluble” would become an empty signifier.

Second, because changing the church’s teaching on marriage in this way would unweave the larger Catholic view of sexuality, sin and the sacraments — severing confession’s relationship to communion, and giving cohabitation, same-sex unions and polygamy entirely reasonable claims to be accepted by the church. [Which is precisely what the catholic Left wants. It’s about having sex with anything you want.]

Now this is, as you note, merely a columnist’s opinion. So I have listened carefully when credentialed theologians make the liberalizing case. What I have heard are three main claims. [By now, dear readers, you can see why the catholic Left is so terrified of Ross Douthat right now. He is breaking them across his knee, looking and the marrow, and then writing about it in one of the catholic Left’s sources of revelation, Hell’s Bible (aka NYT).] The first is that the changes being debated would be merely “pastoral” rather than “doctrinal,” and that so long as the church continues to say that marriage is indissoluble, nothing revolutionary will have transpired. [Which everyone knows is little better than a game of three card monte.]

But this seems rather like claiming that China has not, in fact, undergone a market revolution because it’s still governed by self-described Marxists. No: In politics and religion alike, a doctrine emptied in practice is actually emptied, whatever official rhetoric suggests. [Well done.]

When this point is raised, reformers [having been beaten at their first attempt] pivot [like ballerinas] to the idea that, well, maybe the proposed changes really are effectively doctrinal, but [but!]not every doctrinal issue is equally important, and anyway Catholic doctrine can develop over time. [Thus shuffling the slightly bent cards on top of their cardboard box.]

But [But!] the development of doctrine is supposed to deepen church teaching, not reverse or contradict it. [There it is.] This distinction allows for many gray areas, admittedly. But effacing Jesus’ own words on the not-exactly-minor topics of marriage and sexuality certainly looks more like a major reversal than an organic, doctrinally-deepening shift. [And the Kasperites also run quickly to explain that the clear words of Jesus mean different things to different people in different times and they must be reinterpreted in ways appropriate for changing circumstances.]

At which point we come to the third argument, which makes an appearance in your letter: You don’t understand, you’re not a theologian. [This is the famous “‘Shut up!’, he explained” argument.] As indeed I am not. But neither is Catholicism supposed to be an esoteric religion, its teachings accessible only to academic adepts. And the impression left by this moving target, I’m afraid, is that some reformers are downplaying their real position in the hopes of bringing conservatives gradually along. [You mean to say that they are… what’s the word… deceptive?]

What is that real position? That almost anything Catholic can change when the times require it, and “developing” doctrine just means keeping up with capital-H History, no matter how much of the New Testament is left behind. [That, dear readers, is the Kasperite method in a nutshell.]

As I noted earlier, the columnist’s task is to be provocative. So I must tell you, openly and not subtly, that this view sounds like heresy by any reasonable definition of the term. [OORAH!]

Now it may be that today’s heretics are prophets, the church will indeed be revolutionized, and my objections will be ground under with the rest of conservative Catholicism. But if that happens, it will take hard grinding, not just soft words and academic rank-pulling. It will require a bitter civil war.

Douhart is on it again. Bullseye!
God bless this good man for writing the utter truth. The Roman Catholic theological academy is running on hubris – the usual “publish or perish.” If their “theology” is not of the groin or adolescent rebellion, or in a lip lock with Marxism, it don’t sell. The heterodox see it as their mission to cull any and all that might threaten their agenda to eviscerate the Church of its mission to evangelize the world in the name of our Lord, our Saviour, Jesus Christ, true God and true Man, Son of God and Son of Mary. To them He and the Magisterium are a bit of a scandal, rather like the lovable but embarrassing odd uncle.
Sometimes aberrant Catholic “theology” is referenced as that of “the wink and the nod.” Their flip side is the “dropped mouth,” the eyes darting to the ceiling, the hesitant and abruptly muttered “yes” offered when confronted unexpectedly with orthodoxy or a threat to a career. Then there is the “disarming tactic” they employ by offering a point of view that is so erroneous that one is simply silenced by the utter ridiculousness of the proposal.
It is reptilian. Nothing less than of a forked tongue.
Ladder climbing wanna-be Roman Catholic educators abandoned fidelity to Scripture, Apostolic Tradition and the Magisterium in the years going into the Second Vatican Council. Initially it was thought to be a step into a world that would allow the Catholic voice to be heard and enriched. It has proven to be the imbibing of toxic waste.
Clergy and academic “theologians” need drop the persona they sport for aggrandizement and vest themselves with fidelity to Jesus Christ, employing the wisdom of devotion and common sense. This era can find its resolution on the Heart of Christ, rather than in cesspool of pride, hedonism and secular materialism. When next some high ranking ecclesiastic appeals to the effervescent and intoxicating waters of the academy in lieu of orthodoxy, he might want to check what he is chugging down.

If you want a real fright, read the comments section after his column. There sure are a lot of readers of the NYT who want to tell you exactly how many years of Catholic school they attended before discovering that the Church was irrelevant, corrupt, backwards, superstitious, misogynistic, mean to puppies, etc…

Too bad Ross is not a bishop! I say Bravo! to him. After reading what you say, SaintJude6, I don’t even want to subject myself to reading any comments at that rag. Thank you, Father Z for exposing us to all this and showing us that there are others “on our side”. Of course we have the invisible army on our side also!

As one who has been bullied by the liberal “c”atholic establishment as a youth and as an adult, I am glad to see Mr. Douthat this in the open. These people thrive on subterfuge and darkness — it is time for hidden things to be shouted on the rooftops.

What a role model! I don’t know what kind of assurances he may have received from the NYT to continue his column “no matter what”, but in the age of cowardice and capitulation, I am deeply impressed by his willingness to state the truth boldly and without apparent fear for his own position. Would that everybody followed suit! Now we see what courage and love for Jesus Christ looks like in our current day. We are going to need many Russ Douthat’s.
He is right, we have the far better argument, but if nobody voices it, does it matter?
Granted, the Apostolic Exhortation is pending. The pope has played his hand with two writings, the end of the Synod and the other commentary. He was blocked by faithful Cardinals and that left him seething. You don’t block him. Cardinal Burke was a thorn he publicly removed before the battle had even begun. He will deal with those who blocked him and get accomplished the goal before him.
There have always been heresies and heretics, but they have unprecedented ability to do damage today, to the Church, the faith, and to souls. The heretics are going to do what they want anyway, they already are. The faithful won’t do it at all. This is a battle for the Church in the Middle. The Church in the Middle contains much of the culture, families, and many souls.
We need heroic virtue at these times. The men in the power seats of the church must be ready to participate fully. This cannot be a lay effort although the laity have a definite part. It will require bold words and actions, being able to give an account and hardest of all, sticking to it when demons shriek.
When the AE comes out, that will be the initial shot.

Great rebuttal! Wonderful insight and intellect. Ah, the pride of some of the academics! So smart and so lost are some of them. Better to be an ignorant humble little person embracing all the tenants of the faith and striving for holiness.

Few things are certain in this world, but this I believe with untroubled confidence: liberal Catholics are on the wrong side of history.

Our Lord has already assured us that the Church will stand the test of time, and “the gates of Hell will not prevail” against it. Ours isn’t the first era in which that promise has seemed distant and uncertain. We should take heart, however: over the course of the last two millennia, quite a lot of people have bet against the Church, and lost.

While I will refrain from commenting on the morality of the practice, you can read Douthat’s columns online without a subscription by going to the NYT page and then clicking on the “stop loading” button on the browser before the blocking script loads.

This post fits well with the previous post on sedevacantism. Because with the current pontificate, the sedes believe the words and actions of Pope Francis clearly illustrate their position. If the Pope makes the reception of Holy Communion possible for the divorced and remarried outside of an annulment, then perhaps the sedes’ argument doesn’t seem so on the fringe anymore. I have no doubt the likes of Mr. Douthat and all who adhere to the timeless teachings of Our Lord and His Church will continue to suffer. But, this is the time the Bride must suffer as Her Groom suffered. May God grant us His strength. +JMJ+

“I would say to those who signed the letter against Ross Douthat, “Make an argument against him; prove him wrong; marshal your evidence; have a debate with him; take him on. But don’t attempt to censor him.” I understand that the signatories disagree with him, but he’s playing by the rules.”

* “Professional qualifications”:
Auxiliary bishop of Los Angeles.
MA, Philosophy – Catholic University of America
Doctor of Sacred Theology – Catholic Institute of Paris
Rector – University of St. Mary of the Lake
Professor – University of St. Mary of the Lake
Visiting Professor – University of Notre Dame
Visiting Professor – Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas
Scholar in Residence – Pontifical North American College at the Vatican
Founder – Word on Fire Catholic Ministries.

Obviously, not all academic theologians are morally liberal (the late Ralph MacInerny, for example). One wonders what, exactly, it is that drives the liberal ones. Well, the conservative ones already have a fixed, stable position, so the liberal ones must always appear to be shouting to be heard. The fact may be that, per person, the liberals express their angst and demand more attention than any group of conservatives of the same size.

Many theologians would make poor mathematicians, because they refuse to except that theology, like mathematics, is not a matter of feelings, but of reason and of following the truth wherever it leads. They want to be in charge of the parade.

Ross Douthat is rapidly becoming that which I have sought in the mainstream medium.. the lone voice crying out in the wilderness. His arguments are based in reason and Christian values, not, it appears the libertarian objectivism that has seemed to dominate conservative columnists for so long. And his firm grasp of Catholicism only makes it better.

Excellent! Incidentally, one of the things that has brought us to this state is precisely the rise of expert culture, with “expert” meaning someone who has degrees from the right officialdom-approved place. This is precisely what gives academia, otherwise useless because it is the home of nothing but stale, state-controlled concepts that pass as learning, its power and also makes it the paradise of people like the heretical mediocrities at BC. Power and a platform is what it’s all about. Learning? Thought? Forget it.

The other thing that bothers me about this is what looks like an attempt to silence a journalist. This is a classic leftist technique. The Vatican has been very discomfited of late by the revelations of certain journalists and writers, and a real attempt was made during the Synod to exclude anybody who might not be easy to control or who had not shown himself to be 100% pro-Francis (which is how everything is defined now). I wonder to what extent that was involved in the arrest this weekend of the priest member of the financial committee, who was accused of “leaking” things that will be published in two books on Vatican finances scheduled to come out later this week.

Whether he was “leaking” is a little unclear, since he’s a smart, orthodox priest with an impressive background in financial management and a spotless record. I don’t think he’d be devious enough or basically stupid enough to do something like this. But be that as it may, his arrest will certainly strike a little fear into journalistic hearts.

I don’t know that what has been done to date has been all about “defending the status quo” as another poster says above, but, I think that the columnist is right in the Erasmus talk that new approaches are necessary, have been necessary. To this end, panic is not really great or helpful. I think our blogmaster rightly presents the notion of having a plan. I would like to add that to the plan we need leaders — it should go without saying. It may or may not be a matter of looking to hierarchy. Lay leaders to my mind are essential. All sorts of Catholics in these decades have jettisoned the notion of obedience to rightful authority, as well as the current times’ American renegade way of thinking as best, innovation, individuality, etc., and no one hardly has had the benefit of proper Catholic formation in community. And yet somehow it won’t due for pockets of ghettos to maintain turf and bubble up creativity to marshal to their own exclusive benefit.

I have to say that EWTN over the past couple years seems to be taking on some of the lion’s share of leadership in that they now have very timely current news service, frequently updated and live, and, their ordinary form Mass incorporates even more fuller diversity of beauty and tradition — today the OF televised Mass included the chanting of the Dies Irae. The formation offered there is sound, and they seem to in their live programming as well as series manage to visit and highlight, explain the full array of orthodoxy today including the beauty and hope of the EF Mass. I think that is an excellent start anyway.

Ross Douthat says”…it will take a hard grinding, not just soft words and academic rank pulling…” Therefore with all the confidence of those who have taken to heart the words, Not a bone was broken.” and because no other thing on earth so accurately portrays that “Great Mystery” which is Christ and his Church, as does Holy Matrimony, yes Marriage between a man and a woman in Bone of my Bone fashion , It will take a hard grinding indeed! We the ossified ones say, with all humility of course, Bring it on!

At which point we come to the third argument, which makes an appearance in your letter: You don’t understand, you’re not a theologian.

Not all theologians would agree with those who signed the letter, which effectively refutes their argument. Their approach, however, is typical of liberals, whose MO is consistently avoiding rational discourse in favor of ad hominem attacks. They’re interested in power, not Truth.

I saw Douthat’s column about six hours after it was published, and already there were eleven hostile responses. It seems like the opposition was waiting for him. What if we were to do the same both to support him and to refute his critics? This would involve knowing his publishing schedule, both date and time of day.

This is harder to do than affecting poll results, but there are many articulate people here who know how to frame clear and convincing arguments. In fact, it would be very helpful if for any given argument of his or of his attackers, someone could point to good sources for supporting or opposing arguments, statistics, official documents, lines of argument.

Mr. Douthat’s column is encouraging, a salvo into the enemy headquarters launched from its own camp. Fantastic! We need to take the fight to them and stop playing the defensive game every time they attack.

I’m a little troubled by the level of enthusiasm shown for Mr. D after his column was released. Every time faithful Catholics, tired and embattled, gain even an inch of ground, we tend to make a secular messiah of the person who led the charge. E.g., this morning Life Site News ran a story entitled, “House Speaker Paul Ryan: To be honest, we can’t defund Planned Parenthood.” Another secular messiah offers his pinch of incense to Ceasar. Grrrrr. (Difficult? Yes. Impossible? No.)

Let’s place this in the “win” category and give Mr. D the praise he richly deserves, without being naive. God bless Mr. Douthat and all priests, religious, and lay persons who defend — in words and deeds — the perennial teachings of the Church every day. God grant us the grace to stand firm, anchored in Truth.

Yeah, I knew that. I used some of his work on analogy in the writings of St. Thomas and Aristotle in my humor research. I, temporarily, misplaced my brain, as you can tell from my spelling errors in the comment, as well.

VexillaRegis,

The way Mr. Douthat’s name was pronounced at the Eramus lecture was Dow-That, if I recall correctly.

“At which point we come to the third argument, which makes an appearance in your letter: You don’t understand, you’re not a theologian. ”

I am not that impressed by this argument. I do highly interdisciplinary work, so I have had to learn to interact with scholars from a number of fields. Let me put things into perspective: in doing my doctoral work in music, I needed to have advanced knowledge of plant anatomy since I was doing work on materials related to musical instruments and until recently, most of these materials were woods or reed materials. I, literally, walked off the street into a graduate plant anatomy class and took it for credit, not having had a biology class for many years (being a physical scientist). Guess what, I didn’t have a problem (and I even got published for a truly hilarious reason). If one knows how to learn, one can study from most fields, except those that require developed skills, such as dance or music performance (I could not walk into a graduate cello class and play the instrument). Yes, there is specialized knowledge in most fields, but, fundamentally, how much different is, say, historical theology than music history, in terms of actual techniques? I know how to do research in both the sciences and the arts. Most of the disciplines use a set of consistent core methods that, once learned, can be applied to most other fields, with only the knowledge-base being changed.

Again, all physicists, chemists, and engineers know math at least well enough to teach college undergrads math through the sophomore year, so why should the math people tout their Ph.d in mathematics for anything other that teaching advanced classes? Likewise, most well-read Catholics have enough knowledge to teach probably up to high school and, maybe beginning college courses. Heck, I could walk off the street and teach Church history at the undergrad level, although it would be less of a stretch for me, being an historian in another field. Advanced degrees are required for doing advanced work.

Now, understanding the causes of the break-up of the family is, truly, an interdisciplinary problem – one which the theologians do not have a corner on by themselves. Neither does it require an advanced degree because, to date, guess what, little truly good empirical work has been done and very little by theologians. Anyone who knows how to do research can have creditable input in the discussion. Journalists, at least the good ones, know how to investigate.

As for the Communion issue – just how subtle a matter is that, really? These liberal theologians not only insult Douthat, but the generations of theologians that came before them, claiming, subtly, that these prior generations never knew that there could be, “difficulties,” in the standard theology. Oh, wait…they didn’t, because Communion for the divorced and unlawfully remarried is not a graduate-level question. It is more of a question for high schoolers. It isn’t advanced calculus; it is algebra and any reasonably educated person should be able to understand the underpinnings because, like algebra, it is a subject that was settled centuries, ago.

So, Mr. Douthat, you have an ally in me. I’m pretty sure I know how to do research.

The third criticism of Douthat–which, it must be emphasized, Douthat is not oversimplifying–really is something. “You lack a degree in theology; therefore, you’re wrong.” I mean–good Lord. Let’s set aside the fact–and it is a fact–that “theology” departments in the 21st century are, with very few exceptions, playgrounds for social justice warriors who absolutely blow at thinking carefully about things. Having a graduate degree from such places is simply not impressive. It’s truly appalling that there are actual academics capable of resorting to this Reductio ad Lack of Credentials. I wonder if they encourage their students to write papers defending arguments of the form “So-and-so says that p; So-and-so has a Ph.D. from an Eminent Theology Department; therefore, p.”

Just to finish putting the nail in the coffin of the excuse that Mr. Douthat is not a theologian, so he couldn’t possibly understand the subtleties of divorce theology, the idea that only someone with a Ph.d can understand subtle arguments is a backwards form of the fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam, or the appeal to authority or reverence. Normally, the argument says that experts are only experts in their field and anything they say outside of that has no more right to reverence than the common man’s opinion. What the backwards form of the fallacy says is a form of the fallacy of the accident – that only experts in a field with a Ph.d are the only people who can have expert knowledge. In this case, it reads:

If X is a theologian, then X understands theological subtleties;
X understands theological subtleties, therefore he is a theologian.

This is easily proven false. Pierre de Fermat understood statistics (he co-invented the field) and number theory (he is probably the most famous number theorist), but he was a lawyer; Michael Faraday understood electromagnetism (he created the field), but he was a bookbinder. Many examples can be found of amateurs doing important research. Robert Marcellus was the most famous clarinetist of the twentieth-century, but he had a bachelor’s degree in music for most of his life (he had to get a master’s to teach in college), but who doubts that he was the expert in his field?

A Ph.d means you have done significant independent scholarly research and it permits one to teach graduate students, but it does not make one an expert in all matters within the discipline. I doubt most of the Ph.d theologians who signed the letter against Mr. Douthat are experts in the theology of marriage, so, technically, their opinion is only a little bit better informed than his. One of the foremost experts on Humanae Vitae is Dr. Janet Smith, but her Ph.d is in Classics, not theology.

An expert is someone who has done the work and sweated the sweat to really know what is what. Some people do this in college; some people do this at home. The expert in the classification of certain types of mathematical groups is a simple housewife. Who knew?

The whole thing reminds me of a slogan that has emerged in the elementary school world in the wake of the general bullying epidemic that plagues our schools, which have become by and large, much less safe, kind, and tolerant, in the wake of the summer of love and VII (?), and wherein the Golden Rule is verboten. Nowadays little tykes are taught to declare the maxim “You can’t say you can’t play” to counteract the out of control currents and dynamic of bullying which have taken hold of our schools. It’s largely ineffectual against what plagues our young people, understandably as it doesn’t partake of dialogue, listening, respect, or reason, but, even little ones comprehend the notion of basic fairness which the slogan envisions.

The other thing that’s fun is the idea that using the ‘h’ word is for “professionals only”. Us peasants, illiterate and reality show consuming, are simply not schooled sufficiently to identify heresies and call them out or attempt to discuss them, even though we are Church and the laity, so the letter asserts. Those who make their living lecturing others are the only ones who may engage in that privilege. Even if they pretend it is otherwise, it has always actually been the responsibility of laity to recognize heresy and protect the faith from it. I can say with confidence that even in our strange times, children are being taught to recognize them and employ apologetics toward communicating the full Gospel to others. Some are even reading Belloc! The history of the Church is a wild and wonderful thing. Young people, untitled, undegreed, have been known to, in these very times, study the various councils of the Church and consider what occurred. Speaking strictly as a diletantte, a lot of us moms have had to recreate the wheel so to speak in Catholic education in recent times, having to go back before a lot of the products of American theology, to find good solid teaching material, upon which we would be happy to let our children base their journeys of faith, because the stuff served up in the last decades under this academy’s watch has been found wanting, incoherent, discouraging, gutting of what is life giving about the Gospel and the Faith, which we, even from a public health standpoint, desire for our families. And it’s quite amusing that all of us do this with no titles, no degrees, no salary (eek!). We give, without cost. Understandably this academy feels like their authority has been usurped. Time permitting, us moms would be happy to sit down with them (finally!) and explain our goals and concerns, and how we have found it quite easy in many cases to impart knowledge to our children even while balancing and juggling several other situations and even serious problems besides. It can be done!

“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z

CLICK and say your Daily Offering!

"We as Catholics have not properly combated (the culture) because we have not been taught our Catholic Faith, especially in the depth needed to address these grave evils of our time. This is a failure of catechesis both of children and young people that has been going on for fifty years. It is being addressed, but it needs much more radical attention... What has also contributed greatly to the situation is an exaltation of the virtue of tolerance which is falsely seen as the virtue which governs all other virtues. In other words, we should tolerate other people in their immoral actions to the extent that we seem also to accept the moral wrong. Tolerance is a virtue, but it is certainly not the principal virtue; the principal virtue is charity... Charity means speaking the truth. I have encountered it (not speaking the truth) many times myself as a priest and bishop. It is something we simply need to address. There is far too much silence — people do not want to talk about it because the topic is not 'politically correct.' But we cannot be silent any longer."

Paypal Donation

"Where priest and people together face the same way, what we have is a cosmic orientation and also in interpretation of the Eucharist in terms of resurrection and trinitarian theology. Hence it is also an interpretation in terms of parousia, a theology of hope, in which every Mass is an approach to the return of Christ."

"In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized or have been given the legal status and rights belonging to marriage, clear and emphatic opposition is a duty. ... If all Catholics are obliged to oppose the legal recognition of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians are obliged to do so in a particular way, in keeping with their responsibility as politicians." CDF 2003

One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting.
— C. S. Lewis

Some words of wisdom…

The more vigorously the primacy was displayed, the more the question came up about the extent and and limits of [papal] authority, which of course, as such, had never been considered. After the Second Vatican Council, the impression arose that the pope really could do anything in liturgical matters, especially if he were acting on the mandate of an ecumenical council. Eventually, the idea of the givenness of the liturgy, the fact that one cannot do with it what one will, faded from the public consciousness of the West. In fact, the First Vatican Council had in no way defined the pope as an absolute monarch. On the contrary, it presented him as the guarantor of obedience to the revealed Word. The pope's authority is bound to the Tradition of faith. … The authority of the pope is not unlimited; it is at the service of Sacred Tradition.

"The Catholic Church is an institution I am bound to hold divine—but for unbelievers a proof of its divinity might be found in the fact that no merely human institution conducted with such knavish imbecility would have lasted a fortnight."

For contemplation…

"Latin is a precise, essential language. It will be abandoned, not because it is unsuitable for the new requirements of progress, but because the new men will not be suitable for it. When the age of demagogues and charlatans begins, a language like Latin will no longer be useful, and any oaf will be able to give a speech in public and talk in such a way that he will not be kicked off the stage. The secret to this will consist in the fact that, by making use of words that are general, elusive, and sound good, he will be able to speak for an hour without saying anything. With Latin, this is impossible."

- - Giovanni Guareschi

Support them with prayer and fasting.

Click for Car Magnets

Help the Sisters. They have a building project. Get great soap (gifts, etc.) while helping REAL nuns!

Great data SIM and device for travel.

Leave VOICE MAIL for Fr. Z

Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.

WDTPRS

020 8133 4535

651-447-6265

Let us pray…

Grant unto thy Church, we beseech
Thee, O merciful God, that She, being
gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may
be in no wise troubled by attack from her
foes.
O God, who by sin art offended and by
penance pacified, mercifully regard the
prayers of Thy people making supplication
unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of
Thine anger which we deserve for our sins.
Almighty and Everlasting God, in
whose Hand are the power and the
government of every realm: look down upon
and help the Christian people that the heathen
nations who trust in the fierceness of their
own might may be crushed by the power of
thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ,
Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee
in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world
without end. R. Amen.

Yes, Fr. Z is taking ads…

A great hymnal…

Mystic Monk Coffee also has TEA! UPDATE LINK

Because it matters what children read…

I carry one of these super-strong rosaries in my spare mag pouch! The Swiss Guards have them too!

The Swiss Guard have these rosaries!For the story clickHERE and HERE (esp. 18:00)

Because you don’t know when you are going to need to move fast or get along without the supermarket…

My Wish Lists

Main Wishlist Kindle WishlistAudio WishlistHam Radio ListNEW

Food For Thought

“The legalization of the termination of pregnancy is none other than the authorization given to an adult, with the approval of an established law, to take the lives of children yet unborn and thus incapable of defending themselves. It is difficult to imagine a more unjust situation, and it is very difficult to speak of obsession in a matter such as this, where we are dealing with a fundamental imperative of every good conscience — the defense of the right to life of an innocent and defenseless human being.”

A morsel for thought…

"If your work is strong enough for someone to hate you, it's strong enough for someone to love you. The middle is what you should fear."

- Sean McCabe @seanwes

For your consideration…

"One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting."

- C.S. Lewis

More food for thought:

“I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square. His successor will pick up the shards of a ruined society and slowly help rebuild civilization, as the church has done so often in human history.”

Francis Card. George

Fr. Z’s stuff is everywhere

Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!

They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!

"It will never be known what acts of cowardice have been committed for fear of not looking sufficiently progressive."

Charles Pierre PéguyNotre Patrie, 1905

"If I ought to write the truth, I am of the mind that I ought to flee all meetings of bishops, because I have never seen any happy or satisfactory outcome to any council, nor one that has deterred evils more than it has occasioned their acceptance and growth."

St. Gregory Nazianzus
ep. 131 - AD 382

“We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women. If we do not reach that time, then our children and grandchildren will reach it, and they will sell your sons as slaves at the slave market.”

To set up a recurring, monthly donation via PAYPAL (even a small one) go to the bottom of this blog and look for the drop down menu! Do you want yet another alternative to PayPal? I have set up an account with
CONTINUE TO GIVE
Get a link to donate via CONTINUE TO GIVE using your smart phone.
SEND MESSAGE:
4827563
TO:
715-803-4772
They take a larger percent taste, but they are an alternative.

I remember benefactors in my prayers and periodically say Mass for your intention.

This catechism helped to bring Fr. Z into the Catholic Church!

Be a “Zed-Head”!

Fathers, you don’t know who might show up! It could be a “big fish” of one sort or other…

And... GO TO CONFESSION!

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

What people say…

"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."

- Kractivism

"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"

- Michael Sean Winters

"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."

- Anna Arco

“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”

- Comment

"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."

- Sam Rocha

"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."

- Comment

"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."

- Anonymous

Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD

- Comment

Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.

Support Military Chaplains!

Click to donate

Food For Thought

“Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites. . . . Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”

More stuff…

Archives

ENTRY CALENDAR

Do you use my blog often? Is it helpful to you?

If so, please consider subscribing to send a monthly donation. That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.

Some options

Admin Stuff

The opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect the positions of any of the Catholic Church's entities with which I am involved. They are my own. Opinions expressed by commentators in the comments belong to the commentators.