tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post2799742609499199045..comments2016-12-10T03:29:06.834+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Beauty map of LondonDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-41110892895111805492009-01-04T00:36:00.000+02:002009-01-04T00:36:00.000+02:00I am absolutely agree with Ulrich... But anyway, i...I am absolutely agree with Ulrich... But anyway, it is really interesting to observe or study on the connections between sexual relationships and places. I remember a news which was based on a similar survey in a London freesheet (it was not so `scientific` but funny:)) For example, they found that the most of relationships had started in tube stations and especially on northern line (for every hour, it is most crowded station in London!)gulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10461601074722128013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-7519415407259582472008-08-19T16:47:00.000+03:002008-08-19T16:47:00.000+03:00O my god, this is really one of the worst studies ...O my god, this is really one of the worst studies I have come across yet. The authors claim to have established "the first empirical beauty-map" (p. 366), but what they have done is asking a non-representative sample about their BELIEVES about the beauty of residents of different borroughs. What is the worth of a compilation of people's stereotypes? How could a publisher accept a misleading title like this? This all sheds a light on the depressive state of a big part (not all fortunately) of attractiveness research.Ulrich Renzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13897408594246389120noreply@blogger.com