Choosing Technology Unconsciously Can Accelerate Dysfunction

I am excited to be attending my first Wisdom 2.0 Conference this week from February 21-24th. A friend of mine at the Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, NY recommended that it would be a great event. Founded by Soren Gordhamer, Wisdom 2.0 addresses the great challenge of our age: to not only live connected to one another through technology, but to do so in ways that are beneficial to our own well-being, effective in our work, and useful to the world.

According to their website, the people at Wisdom 2.0 come from all over the world and from numerous vocations, including coaches; technology staff from Apple, Microsoft, and Twitter; as well as venture capitalists and entrepreneurs. Everyone shares a common interest: to live with greater wisdom, purpose, and meaning, while using technology in ways that create a more open and healthy culture.

Unfortunately though, most of us have adopted technologies in the past without foreseeing its unintended consequences. By the time we realize the consequences, it’s usually too late. I am looking forward to spending time this week with over 1500 people from many walks of life and all over the world who want to use technology in healthier ways.

Over the years, my wife and I have had many arguments as to what is the appropriate amount of technology use for the children. Most of their friends have several gadgets and games and she felt that they should not feel left out. Having worked many years as a technologist, video producer and a learning game developer, I have been exposed to many of the recommended techniques to hook the user and hold their attention. Without appropriate boundaries to curb their usage, one could easily get addicted to them. You can read more about this in a Newsweek article published in July 2012 titled, “Is the Web Driving Us Mad?”

While it may sound preposterous to blame an external element for our problems, we need to be aware of the potential impact of a temptation. There are two kinds of products that need to be examined carefully. One is a product designed by developers, whether a game or television show, whose intent is to provide the immediate gratification necessary to hook the user and hold their attention for the purpose of making money off of them. The second kind is those technologies that were originally designed to help, like Texting, but whose unintended consequences result in increased accidents and poor English skills. Embracing the discipline of Systems Thinking is a great way to explore the unintended consequences of any new innovation and consider its ramifications at a societal level.

Eckhart Tolle articulates this problem very nicely in his book The New Earth, “Science and technology have magnified the destructive impact that the dysfunction of the human mind has upon the planet, other lifeforms, and upon humans themselves. That is why the history of the twentieth century is where that dysfunction, that collective insanity, can be
most clearly recognized. A further factor is that this dysfunction is actually intensifying and accelerating.”

Broad based exploration and education of the potential long-term consequences of any technological innovation needs to be a key factor in introducing new technologies, especially to children. Much like how new drugs have to be tested for a while to study their side-effects, we may have to consider similar methods for social technologies.

Making a good choice or even a deliberated choice is difficult for most people, who yield to their emotions and then rationalize their choice using logic.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Author of "Beyond the PIG and the APE: Realizing SUCCESS and true HAPPINESS." I am a life coach, speaker and workshop leader.
My vision is to enhance life on our planet by raising awareness of the ego, in a simple manner. My commitment is to empower men and women make better choices to achieve joy and fulfillment, without having to deal with protracted struggles or huge personal crises.
I believe we can build a mindful nation where inner awareness can empower people to thrive in harmony. To this end, I run the Mindful Nation Foundation, a brainchild of Congressman Tim Ryan, author of the book "A Mindful Nation."

One Comment

Good post Krishna, and best wishes for an interesting and fruitful trip.

My time is short this week but there is one observation in the blog that gave me pause, what comes from the pause may show up later.

Your last statement, “yielding to emotions and then rationalizing through logic”, is an example of the confusing manner our cognitive processes work.

Daniel Kahneman in his book targeting laymen, Thinking, Fast and Slow, describes the two processes. System one is the quick loop, similar to Malcolm Gladwell’s “Blink”. System two is the slower “logic” driven loop. There mistake is to think one is better than the other, when in actual practice we will use both, they have different and similar problems of incorrect identification of facts and internal biases, the only way we can hope to counter weight the biases is to increase self awareness.

A last comment, Rationalization is always irrational, so if you find yourself in that activity stop thinking of the issue immediately and revisit with a calmer mind.

About Mindful Choices

A blog to explore the tricks your mind can play. We believe, "If you help them see it, they will build it." The content of this blog contains as many AHA type articles as possible. It is a space where learning can take place, with real life examples, realizations, aha moments, and awareness of the mind tricks.