Illinois, like several other jurisdictions across North America, contains a controversial low-blow regulation. In short the rule states that a fighter struck by an unintentional low-blow that cannot continue may be handed a TKO loss. While the rule may seem absurd, an appeal has slim chance of success if regulators follow the letter of the law in reaching a bout outcome.

Regulation 1370.610(6) requires that male contestants wear a “foul-proof groin protector“. While no such thing practically exists the rule contemplates a groin protector that, if struck by an accidental low blow, offers sufficient protection that a contestant will be able to continue if given adequate time to recover.

From there we go to regulation 1370.630 (c)(2)(b)(iii) which states that “A contestant who is hit with an accidental low-blow must continue after a reasonable amount of time, but no more than 5 minutes, or he or she may lose the bout by technical knockout.”

The only hope Tavares has in the appeal is by focussing on the word “may“. The rule does not mandate a TKO loss in these circumstances but allows the referee to use his/ her discretion to reach such an outcome. The rule exists for the presumed reason that some fighters look for a low blow as a way out of a fight. If Tavares can produce medical evidence, for example, that the low blow led to a real injury, he can urge the State to overturn the bout to a no-contest on the basis that Rule 1370.630 (c)(B)(i) contemplates a no-contest when a fighter can’t continue after an unintentional foul with the rule reading:

If the referee determines, either from his or her own observation or on the advise of the physician, that the bout should not continue because of the injury from the accidental foul, the bout will be declared a no contest if the foul occurred:

during the first 2 rounds of a non-championship bout

If the referee legitimately believed Tavares could not continue after the strike then his appeal has a chance. If, on the other hand, the referee believed he was looking for a way out, the result is within the scope of the rules.

It is also worth noting that the concept of ‘foul proof groin protector’ is a throwback to the days when boxing was the only professional combat sport States regulated. Some jurisdictions historically had this language on the basis that a good groin protector, if hit by padded gloves, should not result in a fighter being unable to continue. This regulation really has no place in MMA with accidental low blows not being limited to gloved punches but also to knees, elbows and kicks.

Latest Trending

GSP's coach laments return of embarrassing MMA superstars

02/22/2019

Firas Zahabi: “The way the market changed, the way that the personalities changed, we went back to our Tito Ortiz days, and even worse to greater degrees. Georges was such a breath of fresh air because he brought class to our sport. We were not embarrassed of our sport when he was there … I was happy to say I’m part of the sport. But nowadays, you have so many superstars who are getting in trouble with the law. The way they behave, it makes the sport look uncivilized. And it’s not the case – 99 percent of our athletes are good people. But it’s unfortunate when the megastars embarrass us all." h/t MMAjunkie • Watch

6' 4", 225, former fighter and founder of 600-employee company on lessons from MMA

02/22/2019

BlueGrace Logistics CEO Bobby Harris: "I have to quote Rob Kahn - he's kind of like the godfather of (Mixed Martial Arts) in Tampa — when you're in a dominating position, dominate. In business, it's a critical thing to remember: When you're in a position to do something great, don't let it pass you by. Do it. We feel we're in a real interesting time when we can make a lot of impact, and we mean to do that." h/t Tampa Bay Times

This is the official website of Mixedmartialarts LLC. Commercial reproduction, distribution or transmission of any part or parts of this website or any information contained therein by any means whatsoever without the prior written permission is not permitted.