From the title I thought it was a wedding photography site. Not sure that I would have gone any further just based on the title. I see it's a combination of all your various photographic endeavors rolled into one. Might be a better idea to separate those onto individual sites, ie just landscape, just portraiture, etc.

If people are like me, they highlight the unlinked version, right click, and select "search google for". I was quickly directed to photography by someone named Julie Comeaux (appears she does wedding, portraits, sports, seniors, etc. - might make for some confusing critiques).

From a quick look, the work looks very nice. Perhaps once a visitor is into an actual gallery, the big image at the top (the image that loops through the other gallery choices) could disappear, leaving only the header and navigation options.

Maybe also the main picture in the framing category could be redone. The cloning on the frame is pretty distracting. If you need a bigger image, just make a new one or use something else. If a person doesn't recognize the image as having been cloned, they might get the impression that the frames are uneven or odd in some way. It might take a bit of time to re shoot the image, but it is the collective effect of the little details that reassures a visitor to actually make a purchase over the interwebs.

http://www.onceinalifetimephotography.com....amp;seo=GalleryLike the gallery descriptions, but would like to know how many images are in each. The "prints and framing" and "services" links at the bottom are unnecessary and distracting. They are already at the top menu. Similar comments on other pages.

Once an enlargement is displayed, it hides some thumbnails and the rest turn very dark. There is no navigation help for the next, previous or random selection. The top menu disappears. I did not feel like going any further.