what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

what do people like about D-Chess' sig? to me, the color is bad, a weird, yellow-green tone, the render is too dark, and the stroke looks bad. Vatech's is much better, much cleaner, and the text is 10X better.

I don't like the render...i don't kmow, looks blurry to me; throws off the whole sig for me.

that's the style... D-Chess' is so dark that you can't see it either.

That's the style.

no, not when it doesn't match the BG at all...

It must not be that bad, if it's winning the vote.

that's why i asked... "What do people like about D-Chess' sig?"

Whats with the DChess sig bashing and no one elses? Vatechs also had a lot of problem, the render for one was horrible, looks like he streched it to much and looks pixely and also blurry. And the "fire" part of it doesn't even look like its actual fire, more like a smudge.

On DChess' I dont like the outlines, but the render was nicely chosen, yes the text could use some help, but it fits the sig and the background is alos nicely done.

you know, i don't think i'm seeing the same thing as the judges in this competition, because to me, there's been some terrible decisions.

like which in particular?

Personally i think that jkpigskins' is the closest to being a solid sig from this group as my many know is the hue of the render. had it been lighter and matched the BG better it likely could've avoided the elimination round.