Why Are Muslim Countries Refusing to Take A Single Syrian Refugee?

While the United States prepares to bring in over 100,000 Syrian Refugees, Middle-Eastern Muslim countries are refusing to let them in. I wonder why? Oh, wait, I know why! Unlike us, they understand that inviting them in would also invite in terrorists. That’s a bit ironic in light of the fact that Conservatives Nationwide have been saying the same thing only to be met with criticism.

Turns out, we have been right this whole time. So, what do we do about it? It’s time to stand and say NO. 10,000 supposed refugees have already been dumped into our country at a cost of around $16,000 a head. They are then given housing vouchers, Medicaid, and foodstamps, PLUS a GRANT of anywhere from $20,000 and up. How does that solve any of our Nations Debt issues? That money should be going to solve the homeless Veteran epidemic, or to strengthening our own economy NOT to destroying it which is exactly what that number of freeloading possible “terrorists” will do.

Via Breitbart:

Five of the wealthiest Muslim countries have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism. Although the oil rich countries have handed over aid money, Britain has donated more than Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar combined. Between 10 and 12 million Syrians have been displaced by the bloody civil war raging in their country. Most still remain within Syria’s borders, but around four million have fled over the borders into neighboring countries, mostly Turkey Jordan and Lebanon, and beyond. Lebanon, which has 1.1 million Syrian refugees, shut her borders to the Syrians in June of last year. Jordan, host to another 630,000, followed suit in August last year, preventing more Syrians from abandoning their country.

If they truly think they can come here and turn our country into one of their third-world hell-holes, they are sadly mistaken.