Pedophilia Guide Author Arrested

If you would like, I will send it to you when i get home. I would rather not post the actual book. But, it would be nice for someone from your side of
the fence to see what this guy has written..

U2U me your email.. I will send in 2 or 3 pieces.

I absolutely love the irony in this thread. Let me see if I am all caught up now.

You believe that this man should be raped, tortured, and then killed without trial because he wrote a book that is so evil, so dangerous, such a
detriment to society that you are handing out free copies of it.

First of all, if anyone were even to think half logically, the color of a persons skin doesn't determine who they are as a person..
I dont know what you are trying to get at with white people wanting to kill the president.
Just as theres white supremacists, there are black supremacists. Which if you observe the history of it, get away with more racially motivated crimes
today, then a white person would. It doesnt matter what color you are, a crime is a crime.
What does racism or assassinations of presidents have anything to do with defending the fact that there has not been any evidence so far to determine
if this weirdo who wrote the book broke any laws. You cannot be arrested because you wrote an offensive book, or somebody thinks you did something
wrong without evidence. You speak about the liberal movement of leftists. I dont see what that has to do with being "innocent until proven guilty".
People should stop making assumptions about a book they never read, and even assume anything without the court process that hasn't even begun yet.

Honestly, I don't think a book describing *ANYTHING* should be banned nor made illegal.

... once you make one thing illegal to describe, write about, talk about, discuss, convey, etc... then all you have to do is somehow relate the next
thing you want to ban to the previous and all of the idiots (the majority) are on board.

With that being said... I am passionate about killing pedophiles because I feel they are broken/not fixable -

Why exactly do you vehemently defend them?

Haven't seen anyone defending child molseters here, Ressurectio.

I have seen over thirty pages of people telling you how absolutely messed-up it is for someone to call for people to be TORTURED AND MURDERED
for writing a book. Thirty pages of people who think that the one guy in the thread hoping for children to be harmed - that's you, by the way, and
your hopes that people you dislike molest children - is maybe a little messed up.

Disagreeing with you does not mean anyone is rushing to the defense of pedophiles.

But I will say this - if it came down to me having to defend even a convicted pedophile against a mob of poeple like you wanting to torture and murder
him, then yes, I would do so. I presume your parents taught you the phrase, "two wrongs don't make a right"? Well, that's what that phrase means.

Well if it really is as bad as you say, then why wouldn't you spread it to as many people as possible? That is about the only way you would sway
anyone that believes he is within his right to write it. I doubt it will sway many, but you might get a few. I have read many books that I thought
were disgusting, distasteful, and a few that might be dangerous in the information were put to use. I do not think any of those authors should be
arrested, or their books banned though. I mean if you think along those lines, then look at the crazy stuff that children read in school! Chemistry
books, biology books, all kinds of things, that should one of them want to use for evil, would be disastrous! Information is not dangerous, and should
not be inhibited. Once someone has used any information for evil deeds, than they should be punished for said evil deeds.

You have no right trying to tell people how to defend freedom. Patriots will take whatever actions, and say whatever words they wish to that end. You
wanna see wolves, look at all the rabid examples of "Americans" who want this guy dead now...instead of giving him a trial.

I wasn't waving any knee-jerk blah blah blah you are trying to falsely accuse me of. If you had actually read the thread, you would have known I
meant what I said LITERALLY. The people who keep throwing quotes and law references were not linking to sources. Like the OP, and Ignorant Ape. Maybe
next time, you will actually read the whole thread...then you won't look like a misinformed child who doesn't get it. The ironic thing is...you
accused me of "knee-jerk" reaction and paranoia but you are the one who jumped to conclusions about me.

Even if he is proven a pedophile sometime in the FUTURE, he was still entrapped CURRENTLY. It must have taken a grand bout of maturity to conclude
that his current treatment is just reward for something he may or may not do in the future. You must be the type who thinks it's okay for minorities
to get abused by the police, cause hey...they might all be proven gang-bangers in the future.

How about we hope nothing, except that his rights get respected. Just like you'd want your rights to get respected if you got entrapped by the
police.

Anyways, maybe next time you'll read a whole thread instead of knee-jerk reacting to people and then accusing them of knee-jerk reactions.

With that being said... I am passionate about killing pedophiles because I feel they are broken/not fixable -

Why exactly do you vehemently defend them?

Haven't seen anyone defending child molseters here, Ressurectio.

I have seen over thirty pages of people telling you how absolutely messed-up it is for someone to call for people to be TORTURED AND MURDERED
for writing a book. Thirty pages of people who think that the one guy in the thread hoping for children to be harmed - that's you, by the way, and
your hopes that people you dislike molest children - is maybe a little messed up.

Disagreeing with you does not mean anyone is rushing to the defense of pedophiles.

But I will say this - if it came down to me having to defend even a convicted pedophile against a mob of poeple like you wanting to torture and murder
him, then yes, I would do so. I presume your parents taught you the phrase, "two wrongs don't make a right"? Well, that's what that phrase means.

To whoever said he should be killed:
Wow, Those are strong words coming from somebody that most likely doesn't have a doctorate in Medicine,psychology, or spirituality. You think because
someone has an obvious mental disorder they should be destroyed. I believe the nazis did that during WWII. Soo let's destroy anyone that has a F'ed
up way of thinking, or is sick in the head, and just move on. Dude, I would be scared if you held any position of power. If the guy broke the law, he
should be punished, but i dont know about a mass extermination of mentally sick people or people you dont like.
There's also no evidence he ever touched any children, he just wrote a book about it. soo. stay tuned til we find out more.

The right thing to do, is proclaim people who haven't even gotten a trial of guilt. Because we all know that if we were the one who got arrested, we
would want them to just railroad us through the system. We wouldn't want an open-minded jury or anything, we would just want the jurors to assume
we're guilty.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.