Appendix A of 3GPP TR 33.812 V9.2.0 lists the opinion of the GSMA as[…]Furthermore, one of the major concerns of MNOs is the potential weakening of the well-established and trusted SIM-based GSM/3G security architecture. Extended OTA (any kind and via any bearer of over the air data download to the USIM) capability to facilitate download of new subscriber keys and possibly authentication algorithms represents such a potential weakening of security.[...] not allowing MNOs to fulfil their obligations towards regulatory and other governmental authorities to guarantee secure authentication and billing.

[…]The only proposal in the TR that was acceptable to GSMA SG representatives was the Alternative 2 where operator change was performed by physical replacement of the UICC in the device.[…]

This would allow the likes of Apple to release mobile phones without removable SIM-cards. The biggest question is of course, why the GSMA changed its position and how much control they are willing to relinquish to the end-user, be they Apple or a smart metering company.

Though this will alleviate the problems I identified in my work on Machine to Machine communication, it's only 1 out of the 4 problems that I identified that now could be fixed (seeing is believing). Customers may be able to switch operators in the future, but roaming, national roaming and innovation, will probably still be limited.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me, I am on hiatus

This blog is now on hiatus!
I am a telecom analyst at the OECD, so this blog is on hiatus. All the stuff on is my private opinion from before I worked at the OECD.
To mail me rudolfvanderberg * gmail.com
to call me +33658158508

License

You are free to use the texts on this blog as long as you mention my name and link to the blog. Also you should e-mail me that you have used my texts. I just like to know. Pictures have all rights reserved. Have fun.