All this talk about equality. The only thing people really have in common is that they are all going to die.

Bob
Dylan

Discrimination as a Virtue

It has become an article of faith that discrimination is a concept that is socially unacceptable. The proponents of the 'TC'
culture have deemed any practitioner of this trait as a social leper. We are told that any exercise of prejudice is wrong
and must be condemned. Universal brotherhood is lauded as the goal for behavior and intolerance is damned in all forms. Any
sober critique of society and student of history will be amused with such assessments. The ultimate purpose of 'Social Justice',
we are told, is the underlying reason for the eradication of discrimination. But what is the record of this trek for universal
equality and ubiquitous acceptance of every position and person?

Motives, in the name of fairness, has codified practices
of coercive conformity as our common culture. When 'TC' is used to describe the current condition, Totalitarian Collectivism
is the result. We know countless examples of forced acceptance, but few are willing to challenge the basis upon which these
practices claim to derive their justification.

For those who have minds to think and the courage to ask, is this
the natural order of human behavior? And even more important, should we really aspire to rid ourselves from all vestiges of
discrimination? Civilization emerged from the chaos of continual conflict, because sensible members of the populace desired
to rise above the savage practices that might makes right. Standards emerged for minimum levels of conduct, and penalties
for violations were instituted. Most will acknowledge that the overall objective for this method of improving human behavior
is noble, even if success has been sparse and infrequent.

The ability to distinguish and to make distinctions is
at the root of creating standards of moral principles. Simply put, some actions are proper and ethical, while others are corrupt
and depraved by nature. Discrimination is the capacity to retain your own values and practices. Within its intrinsic function,
is the natural right to accept or reject the culture that prevails, or substitute the customs that deem to be worthy principles
that benefit yourself and society. People are DIFFERENT. That is a fact and truth that is undeniable. Only the idiot will
claim that a merging of the social order into a communal ethos is normal and inevitable.

But we live in an era that
has deemed this fallacious notion, of political correctness, to be the ultimate demeanor. Legislation for the last forty years
has consistently fostered sanctions against the inherent desire to seek your own kind. Whether in housing, business or social
contact, people indubitably search out people who have common aspirations, inclinations and qualities. This is the inborn
order of life. Denunciation of discrimination is akin to negating man's nature. When social progressives conduct a crusade
to remold public behavior, they originate and foster the most hostile and hideous compulsive coercive compliance, that destroys
their stated goal of 'Social Justice'.

Discrimination has been characterized as racism. Quite to the contrary, discrimination
is an ally in the struggle to end bigotry and injustice. When Liberty is suppressed in a quest for equality; hatred and revulsion
breeds, for different groups, cultures and ideologies. All attempts to force equal treatment is futile, even when severe penalties
are imposed.

Affirmative action, housing and employment policies designed to open society to varied groups, have
become the rightful source of resentment and loathing from those who have been labeled as intolerant perpetrators of their
own self interest. Expecting willful acceptance of the destruction of our standards and values is absurd. Efforts to inflict
a sense of guilt upon a culture of independence and self reliance, for the promotion of mediocrity and social welfare; based
upon reverse prejudices is suicidal. 'TC' is the true enemy of 'Social Justice'.

Equality before the law is valid
and deserves adherence. But when the law is designed and administered to foster repression, theft and tyranny; while claiming
liberal toleration and compassion, it loses its legitimacy. Society is at war with itself. And the law has been used to advance
this decay in the name of impelled equity. Where is the fairness in the destruction of our Rights for personal selection?
Our duty is to protect and preserve our heritage of individual freedom. Today the social manipulator in secular humanism denies
our ability to live our values and is bent upon the total elimination of our culture.

Discrimination in the Defense
of Virtue is our RIGHT. Barry Goldwater said it best, but read the entire quote: " I would remind you that extremism
in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. "

In order to accomplish the 'Social Justice' that is desirable for all, we must restore individual LIBERTY. The destruction
of freedom to realize a false equality is tyranny. Our energy for justice needs to be as strong as that for freedom. But when
'TC' elements impose their will upon the true defenders of this Republic, you have the duty to resist their blueprint for
enslavement.

All people are NOT equal. Equality in the law of individual protections is our mutual standard. But
when laws are passed that attempt to legislature the denial of human nature, we must oppose their policies. If you are unable
to understand this right, your sympathy lies with the 'TC'. My lawful and legitimate claim is real and proper. The distinction
that I assert, warrants contempt against the forces of despotism. The discrimination that I retain, seeks to separate from
their ranks. And the sincere tolerance that I gladly extend, is available when you demonstrate the same ability for my culture.
The preeminent Virtue is respect for others, and I need not have repressive laws dictating its meaning.