So who designed God then? And who designed the entity who designed the god?

What does Always Existing mean?

If you can answer that, then you found it.

'always existing' is the same thing as 'coming from nothing'. there is no source ergo nothing to give cause to it. so the universe requires a cause
but this divine creator thing doesnt? gotta watch those double standards...

you lost me there - you mean nothing is something?

go back and reread my post if you have to because the only way to simplify it is to use second grade vocabulary. you might have to sit and think about
it for a while. thats okay too. but inventing a causeless cause to solve the infinite regression problem is basically the gordian knot all over again.
be lazy if you want to, but be honest about it at least.

Cold is the absence of what? Thermodynamics deals with what again? You can't have an absence of something flow. The absence is caused by the
"something" (not giving you the hints) flowing away from it.

So who designed God then? And who designed the entity who designed the god?

What does Always Existing mean?

If you can answer that, then you found it.

'always existing' is the same thing as 'coming from nothing'. there is no source ergo nothing to give cause to it. so the universe requires a cause
but this divine creator thing doesnt? gotta watch those double standards...

you lost me there - you mean nothing is something?

go back and reread my post if you have to because the only way to simplify it is to use second grade vocabulary. you might have to sit and think about
it for a while. thats okay too. but inventing a causeless cause to solve the infinite regression problem is basically the gordian knot all over again.
be lazy if you want to, but be honest about it at least.

Sure I understood what you meant. It's rather you who can't fathom the invisible. Hence it's beyond your imagination nor your ability to conceptualize
what infinity means. In any case, that which is physical is finite but that which is invisible is infinite.

But let's take a look at what you said again to show ya what I mean.

You said:

'always existing' is the same thing as 'coming from nothing'. there is no source ergo nothing to give cause to it. so the universe requires a cause
but this divine creator thing doesnt? gotta watch those double standards...

So 'always existing' = 'coming from nothing'.

Really?

An Always Existing Creator came from "NOTHING"?

How could an Always EXISTING Creator "come from nothing" if it ALWAYS EXISTED - no beginning and no end?

See what I mean? You lost me there.

As for "double standard", again this implies that there's one rule for everything. Surely, you don't believe or subscribed to one standard for all, do
you? If you do then you have much to learn.

Cold is the absence of what? Thermodynamics deals with what again? You can't have an absence of something flow. The absence is caused by the
"something" (not giving you the hints) flowing away from it.

Hah!

Who said 'absence of something'? I didn't say it.

I merely said - cold always flow from hot.

As to Thermodynamics - is it reversible or irreversible you're talking about?

Sure I understood what you meant. It's rather you who can't fathom the invisible. Hence it's beyond your imagination nor your ability to
conceptualize what infinity means. In any case, that which is physical is finite but that which is invisible is infinite.

your imagination is not evidence.

So 'always existing' = 'coming from nothing'.

Really?

An Always Existing Creator came from "NOTHING"?

How could an Always EXISTING Creator "come from nothing" if it ALWAYS EXISTED - no beginning and no end?

Sure I understood what you meant. It's rather you who can't fathom the invisible. Hence it's beyond your imagination nor your ability to
conceptualize what infinity means. In any case, that which is physical is finite but that which is invisible is infinite.

your imagination is not evidence.

So 'always existing' = 'coming from nothing'.

Really?

An Always Existing Creator came from "NOTHING"?

How could an Always EXISTING Creator "come from nothing" if it ALWAYS EXISTED - no beginning and no end?

No source/no beginning = came from nothing

I cannot make this simpler for you. Nor do I wish to.

You still missed my point. Your assuming that the Devine Creator is a CREATED Being hence had a beginning.

Like I said: Always Existing - hence had no BEGINNING! The Devine Creator Always was and always is - always existing.

"Nothing" can not exist thus the only alternative to explain the origin of the universe is an Always Existing uncreated DYNAMIC Creator.

don't feed it. arguing with heathens can be considered works, so publicly resisting heretical science is how some people demonstrate their piety. but
their tune changes pretty quick when said science is construed as supporting intelligent design. it stops being corrupt and starts being promising.
they will take credit for morality but not war, philanthropy but not politics, miracle but not tragedy. then they start blurring the lines between
these things. until you look at slavery and see freedom, look at fear and see strength...

don't feed it. arguing with heathens can be considered works, so publicly resisting heretical science is how some people demonstrate their piety. but
their tune changes pretty quick when said science is construed as supporting intelligent design. it stops being corrupt and starts being promising.
they will take credit for morality but not war, philanthropy but not politics, miracle but not tragedy. then they start blurring the lines between
these things. until you look at slavery and see freedom, look at fear and see strength...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.