This week at CAAF: The next scheduled oral argument at CAAF is on January 13, 2014.

This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in one case this week, on Thursday, January 9, 2014, at 10 a.m.:

United States v. Tauaese, No. 20120176

Issue:
[Whether t]he evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain a conviction for any of the thirteen specifications of larceny as the evidence adduced at trial does not support a finding that Credit First National Association owned the money at issue.

This week at the AFCCA: The Air Force CCA’s website shows no scheduled oral arguments. However, the oral argument in the en banc reconsideration of the capital case of United States v. Witt, No. 36785 (discussed in this post), was rescheduled to sometime later this month.

This week at the CGCCA: The Coast Guard CCA will hear oral argument in one case this week, on Thursday, January 9, 2014, at 10 a.m.:

United States v. Corral

Issues:
I. Whether the Military Judge improperly allowed a special agent to offer testimony, which should have been characterized as expert opinion testimony, as lay opinion testimony under M.R.E. 701, which substantially prejudiced the rights of Appellant.
II. Whether the Military Judge erred in denying the defense motion to compel funding for expert consultant.

This week at the NMCCA: The Navy-Marine Corps CCA’s website shows no scheduled oral arguments.

The views expressed on this blog are offered in the contributors' personal capacities. They do not speak for, and their views should not be imputed to, any other organization, agency, or entity. The views expressed in this blog are those of the individual authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of any military service, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Click here for important disclaimers.