Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Originally Posted by powerrui

u really shouldnt complain about warlock mana drain buff. they already nerfed it once if they dont buff it this spell will become completely useless when 2.4 out.

And that's necesserely a bad thing? Since mana drain teams own 3vs3 and prob 5vs5 (not sure there because I don't play it... too much confusion for me ), and because locks weren't best at one thing they had to be buffed. I understand. It's not already enough that it's the only mana drain that actually drains the mana back to the caster, Life Tap not being enough so it seems. Even with the resilience against mana drain, it still will drain more then it's draining now...

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

The logic is that warlock drains were underpowered compared to the other mana draining classes and the shamans set bonus was overpowered compared to the other 4 piece set bonuses.

You don't create balance by leaving broken bits broken because everything that is broken makes the task of balancing that much harder. Unfortunately this means sometimes buffing strong classes and nerfing weaker classes because even though the class as a whole is strong or weak those individual problems need to be solved as they present an impediment to proper balancing.

what you fail at is that EVERY OTHER DRAIN need a line of sigh vs warlock one that need it only at the start of the casting, dont count hunter sting its removeable exccept by priest.

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Originally Posted by chaud

It isn't like he won't fill his mana with drain life/lifetap anyway. Doesn't really matter to me if he wants to fill up his mana.

Well, it kinda should matter to you if the lock gets more mana because there are alot of teams that tend to beat lock/xx(/xx) 2s and 3s setups by forcing the lock to lifetap for mana while someone is beating on him. If you can get the lock to lifetap while people are dps'ing him down and he's around 70ish%, then you've got the game won right there.

So yeah, a lock's mana *does* matter.

If a shaman tells you that he can't tank, he's just not doing it right.

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Originally Posted by Xombo

Well, it kinda should matter to you if the lock gets more mana because there are alot of teams that tend to beat lock/xx(/xx) 2s and 3s setups by forcing the lock to lifetap for mana while someone is beating on him. If you can get the lock to lifetap while people are dps'ing him down and he's around 70ish%, then you've got the game won right there.

So yeah, a lock's mana *does* matter.

If he's got a couple of people beating on him and he needs to mana drain, that's 6 seconds of the lock being incapable of doing anything else. You really should not have a problem killing him in these 6 seconds.

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

My main is a level 70 elemental shaman. I used to love arena and think it was fun, but i stopped about a month ago to go back to raiding where at least i was worthwhile there. In my opinion, blizzard should never make class changes on arena stuff, if they nerf our lightning bolt/chain lightning damage because we can do a good amount of burst damage which is about one of the only places an elemental shaman is viable in arena, that's just bullshit.

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Originally Posted by Xombo

Well, it kinda should matter to you if the lock gets more mana because there are alot of teams that tend to beat lock/xx(/xx) 2s and 3s setups by forcing the lock to lifetap for mana while someone is beating on him. If you can get the lock to lifetap while people are dps'ing him down and he's around 70ish%, then you've got the game won right there.

So yeah, a lock's mana *does* matter.

If you are mana burning and focusing a lock, he won't get a drain mana off anyway.

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Even if I took away your blink and frostnova? Because with 50% pushback you have to live with the enemy beating you in the face with no way of escaping.

He made it sound like you needed to lose FN and blink to be "eligable" for pushback resistance, I merely stated fire had that opportunity so frost should too, or at least put it mid-arcane for all spells.

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Kalgan himself admitted on the US forum today that Shamans are "pretty well gimped in 2v2" and "on the weak side in 3v3". But at least solid in 5vs5 (though I think this will change in favor of lock/hunter/priest drain teams).

Re: They nerfed shams and buffed locks...lol

Why is everyone hating Warlocks when there is only 1 (ONE!) skilltree that is OP in PvP??

As a Raid-Destro lock, I don't have much chance in BGs/Arenas (ok, I only have 150 resil but anyway). I wouldn't have a problem with equally skilled classes owning me, but a complete noob rogue that stuns me out of stealth, and keeps me stunned for 8k of my 12k life without ANY possibility to do anything (assuming insignia is on cd) followed by an 8 sek quasi immunity to all my attacks (cloak of lol) seems overpowered to me......

So please stop whining about locks or at least have the decency to point out that it is aflli/sl/sl locks that you are talking about.