> Sorry for crashing this discussion, but could you clarify why there
> would be a difference between a png saved by tangogps and locations?
i wouldn't know -- i don't use locations.
but why shouldn't there be _no_ difference?
> If they both use the exact same areas, the exact same name, and they
> both save it as a png then it *should* be compatible. Anything else
> seems way too crazy, no?
how would i know? someone suggested there's a difference and the
questioner did apparenetly no other check than comparing directory
structures and file names.
so, to sort the issue out what's left is comparing the actual images,
don't you think?