Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun carbon dated to 25,000 years old.

Italian archaeologists Dr. Ricarrdo Brett and Niccolo Bisconti discovered an organic material sample (a leaf) on the top of the concrete blocks
that cover Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun in June 2012. Carbon dating was performed in Lab in Kiev, Ukraine with astonishing result: 24.800 years +/- 200
years. This carbon dating puts the pyramid 20 thousand years before the Sumerian and Babylonian “civilizations. In other words, the Bosnian Pyramid
of the Sun dates back to a time when organized human civilizations were not supposed to exist.

Why this is not more extensively covered by the MSM is not surprising, after all, it flies in the face of modern academia with regards to what we are
taught about our ancient past.

It is sites such as the Visoko Valley in Bosnia which includes the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun that would have them needing to re-evaluate everything
that the text books would have you believe to be factual about Earths past civilisations.

The pyramid has all the elements: four perfectly shaped slopes pointing toward the cardinal points, a flat top and an entrance complex. On top of the
pyramid are also the ruins of a Medieval walled town, once the base of a Bosnian king Tvrtko of Kotromanic (1338-1391)

This latest finding from this amazing structure appears to verify that there is enough evidence to conclude that the pyramid pre-dates the Sumerian
civilisation by some 20,000 years.

So, if this is indeed the case, then we do seem to be at a point in history where books will need to be thrown in the fire so that our actual history
can be recorded more accurately to reflect what has been discovered both at this site, as well as sites such as The Pyramid of the Sun in Teotihuacan,
Mexico (the Bosnian pyramid was given her name “pyramid of the sun” due to her similarities to Teotihuacan).

Once again, archaeological findings in recent times have given us food for thought as to how long we have actually been living on this planet.

So this has been proven to be a pyramid? The last I heard it was only speculation that it was while a lot of people wrote the idea off as fantasy.
Have they actually found an entrance to it or is it still an assumption?

How do they carbon date the stone to figure when they were assembled into pyramid formation? carbon from the fragments of the tools used to cut the
stone? how are they not dating the carbon from when the stone was formed?

This is the best thing I've read all week. Thanks for the update on this amazing structure. I have been fairly convinced for awhile that there most
likely was an advanced civilization in our distant past. Either we just don't know or it is being supressed.

Hmmm... they haven't quite dated the pyramid to that time have they? They have just dated something that was on top of the pyramid. That something
might have found its way there after the pyramid was built.

You can't put an enormous amount of faith in these results when "Dr. Brett" isn't actually a Dr and in fact has only a bachelors degree. While true
that in Italy this gives him the right to call himself Dr. It's still terribly misleading as from what I can dig up his area of "expertise" is the
birth of Hebrew culture in Babylonian captivity. I would t co sided this even remote evidence of the alleged structure being 25,000 years old. I keep
hoping for some legit work to be done at this site but as the years drag by and it's further contaminated by amateurs this reality becomes much
diminished in my opinion.

Thats a way of looking at it...id say well get more truth out of the amateurs and more transparency than science has so far given us
archaeologically......you can watch the work on you tube fer petes sake...Hawass wouldnt give you the time of day or the real story in
egypt.....unless you payed him hansomely.

A sample was taken from a cave and sent to the UK - and Osmie didn't get the result he wanted, he actually got no result, it wasn't testably. Then
somehow another sample - from places unknown - was sent to another lab.......

So other than more laughing at the fraud, no real 'discussion' will take place

Originally posted by stirling
Thats a way of looking at it...id say well get more truth out of the amateurs and more transparency than science has so far given us
archaeologically......you can watch the work on you tube fer petes sake...Hawass wouldnt give you the time of day or the real story in
egypt.....unless you payed him hansomely.

You're less likely to get more truth from amateurs and more likely to get inconsistent results that are clouded by people who have no clue stomping
over things that a trained archaeologist would understand the significance of.contrary to popular opinion most scientists aren't marred to dogma.
They would much prefer to be the guy to break the mold and rewrite history.

How do they carbon date the stone to figure when they were assembled into pyramid formation? carbon from the fragments of the tools used to cut the
stone? how are they not dating the carbon from when the stone was formed?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.