This
is Aleister Crowley`s
Essay Introduction to his translation of The Goetia.
THE INITIATED INTERPRETATION OF CEREMONIAL MAGIC

It is loftily amusing to the student of magical literature
who is not quite a fool - and rare is such a combination! - to note the
criticism directed by the Philistine against the citadel of his science.
Truly, since our childhood has ingrained into us not only literal belief
in the Bible, but also substantial belief in Alf Laylah wa Laylah, and
only adolescence can cure us, we are only too liable, in the rush and
energy of dawning manhood, to overturn roughly and rashly both these classics,
to regard them both on the same level, as interesting documents from the
standpoint of folk-lore and anthropology, and as nothing more.

Even when we learn that the Bible, by a profound and minute
study of the text, may be forced to yield up Qabalistic arcana of cosmic
scope and importance, we are too often slow to apply a similar restorative
to the companion volume, even if we are the lucky holders of Burton's
veritable edition.

To me, then, it remains to raise the Alf Laylah wa Laylah
into its proper place once more.

I am not concerned to deny the objective reality of all
"magical" phenomena; if they are illusions, they are at least as real
as many unquestioned facts of daily life; and, if we follow Herbert Spencer,
they are at least evidence of some cause.

Now, this fact is our base. What is the cause of my illusion
of seeing a spirit in the triangle of Art. Every smatterer, every expert
in psychology, will answer: "That cause lies in your brain."

English children (pace the Education Act) are taught that
the Universe lies in infinite Space; Hindu children, in the Akasa, which
is the same thing.

Those Europeans who go a little deeper learn from Fichte,
that the phenomenal Universe is the creation of the Ego; Hindus, or Europeans
studying under Hindu Gurus, are told, that by Akasa is meant the Chitakasa.
The Chitakasa is situated in the "Third Eye," i.e., in the brain. By assuming
higher dimensions of space, we can assimulate this fact to Realism; but
we have no need to take so much trouble.

This being true for the ordinary Universe, that all sense-impressions
are dependent on changes in the brain,' we
must include illusions, which are after all sense-impressions as much
as "realities" are, in the class of "phenomena dependent on brain-changes."

Magical phenomena, however, come under a special sub-class,
since they are willed, and their cause is the series of "real" phenomena
called the operations of ceremonial Magic.

These consist of:

(1) Sight: The circle, square, triangle, vessels,
lamps, robes, implements, etc.
(2) Sound: The invocations.
(3) Smell: The perfumes.
(4) Taste: The Sacraments.
(5) Touch: As under (1).
(6) Mind: The combination of all these and reflection on their
significance.

These unusual impressions, (1-5) produce unusual brain-changes;
hence their summary (6) is of unusual kind. Its projection back into the
apparently phenomenal world is therefore unusual.

Herein
then consists the reality of the operations and effects of ceremonial
magic,' and I conceive that the apology is ample, so far as the "effects"
refer only to those phenomena which appear to the magician himself, the
appearance of the spirit, his conversation, possible shocks from imprudence,
and so on, even to ecstasy on the one hand, and death or madness on the
other.

But can any of the effects described in this our book Goetia
be obtained, and if so, can you give a rational explanation of the circumstances?
Say you so?

(a) General control of the brain. (Establishment of functions
relative to the subtle world.)
(b) Control over the brain in detail. (Rank or type of the Spirit.)
(c) Control of one special portion. (Name of the Spirit.)

The perfumes aid this through smell. Usually the perfume
will only tend to control a large area; but there is an attribution of
perfumes to letters of the alphabet enabling one, by a Qabalistic formula,
to spell out the Spirit's name.

I need not enter into more particular discussion of these
points; the intelligent reader can easily fill in what is lacking.

If, then, I say, with Solomon -
"The Spirit Cimeries teaches logic," what I mean is:

"Those portions of my brain which subserve the logical
faculty may be stimulated and developed by following out the processes
called 'The Invocation of Cimieries'."

And this is a purely materialistic rational statement; it
is independent of any objective hierarchy at all. Philosophy has nothing
to say; and Science can only suspend judgment, pending a proper and methodical
investigation of the facts alleged.

Unfortunately, we cannot stop there. Solomon promises us
that we can (1) obtain information; (2) destroy our enemies; (3) understand
the voices of nature; (4) obtain treasure; (5) heal diseases, etc. I have
taken these five powers at random; considerations of space forbid me to
ex-plain all.

Brings up facts from sub-consciousness.

Here we come to an interesting fact. It is curious to note the contrast
between the noble means and the apparently vile ends of magical rituals.
The latter are disguises for sublime truths. "To destroy our enemies"
is to realize the illusion of duality, to excite compassion.
(Ah! Mr. Waite, the world of Magic is a mirror, wherein who sees muck
is muck.)

A careful naturalist will understand much from the voices of the animals
he has studied long. Even a child knows the difference of a cat's miauwing
and purring. The faculty may be greatly developed.

Business capacity may be stimulated.

Abnormal states of the body may be corrected, and the involved tissues
brought back to tone, in obedience to currents started from the brain.

So
for all other phenomena. There is no effect which is truly and necessarily
miraculous.

Our Ceremonial Magic fines down then, to a series of minute,
though of course empirical, physiological experiments, and who so will
carry them through intelligently need not fear the result.

I have all the health, and treasure, and logic I need; I
have no time to waste. "There is a lion in the way." For me these practices
are useless but for the benefit of others less fortunate I give them to
the world, together with this explanation of, and apology for, them.

I trust that the explanation will enable many students who
have hitherto, by a puerile objectivity in their -view of the question,
obtained no results, to succeed; that the apology may impress upon our
scornful men of science that the study of the bacillus should give place
to that of the baculurn, the little to the great-how great one only realizes
when one identifies the wand with the Mahalingam, up which Brahma flew
at the rate of 84,000 yojanas a second for 84,000 mahakalpas, down which
Vishnu flew at the rate of 84,000 crores, of yojanas a second for 84,000
crores of mahakalpas-yet neither reached an end.