Dyche: Clarets signings may not arrive until pre-season

SEAN Dyche says his recruitment drive has been non-stop, but he admits there is unlikely to be much movement in the transfer market until pre-season approaches.

The Clarets had already begun re-shaping their squad this time last year, with goalkeeper Tom Heaton becoming Dyche’s first permanent signing at Turf Moor last May, as the club overhauled its goalkeeping department following the departures of Lee Grant and long-serving stopper Brian Jensen.

But while Burnley have benefited from the early guarantee of Premier League football next season through automatic promotion, as opposed to the uncertainty of the play-offs five years ago, boss Dyche is not anticipating early transfer activity.

However, he has assured supporters that the process of earmarking targets is a daily work in progress as he bids to bolster his squad for the top flight.

“It’s fair to say we’ve made loads and loads of phone calls as we have been doing during the course of the season, looking at player trading and possibly getting quality into the building because we know we’re going to need that to firm up the squad moving forwards,” said the 42-year-old, who has been linked with a move for Watford striker Troy Deeney, who he worked with at Vicarage Road.

“Nothing’s changed in my feelings on player trading in that it’s not just about us, all parties have to agree – agents, players, the opposition club, ourselves having the financial prowess to get deals over the line.

“It can come in many ways. Some, possibly, could happen immediately, but it’s unusual if you look across the market, most deals take a longer period of time because everyone’s vying for the best position – the selling club, the buying club, the agent, the player. They’re all seeing what’s out there, so usually it happens in the latter part of the close season before pre-season.

“But the number of phonecalls is incredible already to make sure we’re in the hat for the right ones.

“If the right player aligns and the club want to do a deal then we’ll be ready, that’s for sure.”

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley wrote:
No point waiting to see what free dregs are left over. Get some money spent yer tight wad. 120 million burning a hole in yer pocket.

You'll know all about dregs left over won't you, being one yourself.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
No point waiting to see what free dregs are left over. Get some money spent yer tight wad. 120 million burning a hole in yer pocket.[/p][/quote]You'll know all about dregs left over won't you, being one yourself.RobH2O

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

Do you honestly expect us to believe that you are capable of thinking ?

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]Do you honestly expect us to believe that you are capable of thinking ?LonglivetheVenkys

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.RobH2O

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.

Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!

Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?

[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.[/p][/quote]Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!
Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?Ewoodlegend

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.

Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!

Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?

Has anyone got a Google translator that can make sense of the above unintelligible ramblings?

'The stadium looks like its been by blind pigs'?

'Never much I forget you guys are blinkered'

What a cringeworthy whopper you are.

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.[/p][/quote]Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!
Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?[/p][/quote]Has anyone got a Google translator that can make sense of the above unintelligible ramblings?
'The stadium looks like its been by blind pigs'?
'Never much I forget you guys are blinkered'
What a cringeworthy whopper you are.Champagne plus charlie

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.

Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!

Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?

Has anyone got a Google translator that can make sense of the above unintelligible ramblings?

'The stadium looks like its been by blind pigs'?

'Never much I forget you guys are blinkered'

What a cringeworthy whopper you are.

It would take an expert from GCHQ to decipher that one Champers.

[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.[/p][/quote]Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!
Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?[/p][/quote]Has anyone got a Google translator that can make sense of the above unintelligible ramblings?
'The stadium looks like its been by blind pigs'?
'Never much I forget you guys are blinkered'
What a cringeworthy whopper you are.[/p][/quote]It would take an expert from GCHQ to decipher that one Champers.houseclaret

Listen bell boy. This is the time to prove your mummy wrong. She said that when the lump that came out of her was circumcised, they threw away the wrong bit. Get a piece of cotton wool and jam it up your bell and you'll stop dribbling all over this board. 🔔

Ewoodlegend aka Ewoodbell-end.
Listen bell boy. This is the time to prove your mummy wrong. She said that when the lump that came out of her was circumcised, they threw away the wrong bit. Get a piece of cotton wool and jam it up your bell and you'll stop dribbling all over this board. 🔔RobH2O

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.houseclaret

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.TurfMoorTom

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.

Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!

Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?

Good lad, Shadsworth Academy of Knowledge coming to the fore again. It’s a real good laugh – keep it up.

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]OK cupcake; which is it? Wait and see or Ings is going. And why can he only afford 1 player? The bell-end is dribbling again.[/p][/quote]Its a case of not much finance in the club, the money is so scarce the stadium looks like its been by blind pigs!
Never much I forget you guys are blinkered! Have you ever been out of Burnley?[/p][/quote]Good lad, Shadsworth Academy of Knowledge coming to the fore again. It’s a real good laugh – keep it up.tall in the saddle

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.

Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.

Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.

Loser.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.
Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.
Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.
Loser.RobH2O

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.

Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.

Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.

Loser.

You agree with what? There's no connection you c0ckjockey.

To be fair on 'Rivers' fans, they did compete with the likes of Man Utd and in fact beat them by winning the top honor in the land. So I can understand why they considered them to be rivals as they were the closest competition in the country. I guess it would be stupid for Burnley to do the same, it being the case that we won't compete at any meaningful level and sooner or later we will be relegated with the consequent restructuring. What a futile achievement promotion was.

Future turmoil beckons.............
....

[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.
Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.
Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.
Loser.[/p][/quote]You agree with what? There's no connection you c0ckjockey.
To be fair on 'Rivers' fans, they did compete with the likes of Man Utd and in fact beat them by winning the top honor in the land. So I can understand why they considered them to be rivals as they were the closest competition in the country. I guess it would be stupid for Burnley to do the same, it being the case that we won't compete at any meaningful level and sooner or later we will be relegated with the consequent restructuring. What a futile achievement promotion was.
Future turmoil beckons.............
....TurfMoorTom

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

He did well with the free transfers last year. Heaton, arfield n jones. All have been integral and major players. The fact that we get the best out of these players must make you envious hence u keep coming on here!!

[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]He did well with the free transfers last year. Heaton, arfield n jones. All have been integral and major players. The fact that we get the best out of these players must make you envious hence u keep coming on here!!stevieclaret

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

He did well with the free transfers last year. Heaton, arfield n jones. All have been integral and major players. The fact that we get the best out of these players must make you envious hence u keep coming on here!!

The only thing notable about those 3 players is that they most certainly are not Premiership class. Arfield in particular. So well integrated my friend, your demise is already sure.........

[quote][p][bold]stevieclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]He did well with the free transfers last year. Heaton, arfield n jones. All have been integral and major players. The fact that we get the best out of these players must make you envious hence u keep coming on here!![/p][/quote]The only thing notable about those 3 players is that they most certainly are not Premiership class. Arfield in particular. So well integrated my friend, your demise is already sure.........TurfMoorTom

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.

Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.

Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.

Loser.

You agree with what? There's no connection you c0ckjockey.

To be fair on 'Rivers' fans, they did compete with the likes of Man Utd and in fact beat them by winning the top honor in the land. So I can understand why they considered them to be rivals as they were the closest competition in the country. I guess it would be stupid for Burnley to do the same, it being the case that we won't compete at any meaningful level and sooner or later we will be relegated with the consequent restructuring. What a futile achievement promotion was.

Future turmoil beckons.............

....

Losers ignore the points made and change the subject. How are your momentum and Ings theories holding up? Oh they are not! Your about everything all the time Mr Preduction. Loser

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.
Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.
Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.
Loser.[/p][/quote]You agree with what? There's no connection you c0ckjockey.
To be fair on 'Rivers' fans, they did compete with the likes of Man Utd and in fact beat them by winning the top honor in the land. So I can understand why they considered them to be rivals as they were the closest competition in the country. I guess it would be stupid for Burnley to do the same, it being the case that we won't compete at any meaningful level and sooner or later we will be relegated with the consequent restructuring. What a futile achievement promotion was.
Future turmoil beckons.............
....[/p][/quote]Losers ignore the points made and change the subject. How are your momentum and Ings theories holding up? Oh they are not! Your about everything all the time Mr Preduction. LoserRobH2O

Ewoodlegend wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think

He did well with the free transfers last year. Heaton, arfield n jones. All have been integral and major players. The fact that we get the best out of these players must make you envious hence u keep coming on here!!

The only thing notable about those 3 players is that they most certainly are not Premiership class. Arfield in particular. So well integrated my friend, your demise is already sure.........

Another prediction from the UK's leading co.ck-end of all time. Loser.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]stevieclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Ewoodlegend[/bold] wrote:
oh dear waiting to see whats left over. OR I think he is waiting for Ings to leave to get a replacement- can probably only afford 1 player I think[/p][/quote]He did well with the free transfers last year. Heaton, arfield n jones. All have been integral and major players. The fact that we get the best out of these players must make you envious hence u keep coming on here!![/p][/quote]The only thing notable about those 3 players is that they most certainly are not Premiership class. Arfield in particular. So well integrated my friend, your demise is already sure.........[/p][/quote]Another prediction from the UK's leading co.ck-end of all time. Loser.RobH2O

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.

Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.

Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.

Loser.

You agree with what? There's no connection you c0ckjockey.

To be fair on 'Rivers' fans, they did compete with the likes of Man Utd and in fact beat them by winning the top honor in the land. So I can understand why they considered them to be rivals as they were the closest competition in the country. I guess it would be stupid for Burnley to do the same, it being the case that we won't compete at any meaningful level and sooner or later we will be relegated with the consequent restructuring. What a futile achievement promotion was.

Future turmoil beckons.............

....

Blackburn Rovers 1 - 2 Burnley.

Burnley in the Premier League, £120million to the good.

Blackburn fans crying inside as FFP winds up to deliver a financial piledriver.

The turmoil is all yours Mungo. I'll leave you to your bitterness and shame with these three words.....

STAYING.
DOWN.
FOREVER.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I agree. Rovers are far funnier than Joan Rivers. Hilarious actually. Tragic comedy. And that always has a casualty - you for example.
Your Momentum theory. Now that's a solid belly-laugh too. I think you found it in your boll~ocks bin. You know the one - its where you got your Ings Under 21 transfer rubbish.
Under Howe, Burnley finished 13th. Under Dyche its 11th and 2nd respectively. Goodness me, you are thick.
Loser.[/p][/quote]You agree with what? There's no connection you c0ckjockey.
To be fair on 'Rivers' fans, they did compete with the likes of Man Utd and in fact beat them by winning the top honor in the land. So I can understand why they considered them to be rivals as they were the closest competition in the country. I guess it would be stupid for Burnley to do the same, it being the case that we won't compete at any meaningful level and sooner or later we will be relegated with the consequent restructuring. What a futile achievement promotion was.
Future turmoil beckons.............
....[/p][/quote]Blackburn Rovers 1 - 2 Burnley.
Burnley in the Premier League, £120million to the good.
Blackburn fans crying inside as FFP winds up to deliver a financial piledriver.
The turmoil is all yours Mungo. I'll leave you to your bitterness and shame with these three words.....
STAYING.
DOWN.
FOREVER.Super_Clarets

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I know Tom, it's shocking to think that only yourself and I understand the shambles this is turning into.

[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I know Tom, it's shocking to think that only yourself and I understand the shambles this is turning into.AnotherPounding4Burnley

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I know Tom, it's shocking to think that only yourself and I understand the shambles this is turning into.

Giving yourself another reach around I see.

This is taking mental illness to a whole new level FakeVilla.

[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I know Tom, it's shocking to think that only yourself and I understand the shambles this is turning into.[/p][/quote]Giving yourself another reach around I see.
This is taking mental illness to a whole new level FakeVilla.Super_Clarets

andy1 wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.

Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.

I know Tom, it's shocking to think that only yourself and I understand the shambles this is turning into.

Giving yourself another reach around I see.

This is taking mental illness to a whole new level FakeVilla.

That's unutterably sad. He clearly uses this forum as an outlet for his psychiatric problems. Might I suggest you don't engage with him under any of his guises (Anotherpounding, Ewoodlegend, TTT etc) so he goes and seeks professional help? If he's already receiving it, he's being let down by the service and wants to look for a different CPN.

[quote][p][bold]Super_Clarets[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn
ley[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]andy1[/bold] wrote:
Why are we bothered what Rivers fans think they are no longer our rivals. Ours are now the likes of Man U, Man City, Liverpool and Everton.[/p][/quote]Oh no, I hope you're only kidding. I was just criticising Rovers fans for saying just that a few years ago. Let's not stoop to their arrogance (can you STOOP to arrogance - sounds a bit like a contradiction in terms I suppose). Anyway, don't do it.[/p][/quote]Personally I never found Joan Rivers funny anyway.
Looks like Dyche is starting to lose his Howe inherited momentum. Future turmoil beckons.[/p][/quote]I know Tom, it's shocking to think that only yourself and I understand the shambles this is turning into.[/p][/quote]Giving yourself another reach around I see.
This is taking mental illness to a whole new level FakeVilla.[/p][/quote]That's unutterably sad. He clearly uses this forum as an outlet for his psychiatric problems. Might I suggest you don't engage with him under any of his guises (Anotherpounding, Ewoodlegend, TTT etc) so he goes and seeks professional help? If he's already receiving it, he's being let down by the service and wants to look for a different CPN.Chris P Bacon