queezyweezel:Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

queezyweezel:Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

queezyweezel:Mock26: queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

Mock26:queezyweezel: Mock26: queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

ReapTheChaos:queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

queezyweezel:Mock26: queezyweezel: Mock26: queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

queezyweezel:Mock26: queezyweezel: Mock26: queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

So doesn't this violate rule # 3 of the FaRQ? or does HuffPo get a pass since they get on fark so often?

The video does not show anyone dying. Nor does it even show any blood.

Other than that whole bus driver getting flung to his death part, and the people getting their asses beat by the impact...that's not graphic at all....

Not graphic at all. Again, no one dying and no blood.

Also, read the farking article. It reports 1 death in the accident. And it then states that it was the TRUCK driver who died. T-R-U-C-K. You do know the difference between a bus and a truck, right?

My bad. Carry on then you rubbernecking vultures. Enjoy the pain and suffering of others.

/whatever makes you happy, right?

Actualyl if you watch it closely, the bus driver is thrown against the window when it tips over, but he's thrown out while it's rolling downhill. Nothing but sky behind him when he exits the window, which means he probably ended up on the grass above the bus since it was rolling down a hill.

queezyweezel:Mock26: queezyweezel: Mock26: queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

Mock26:queezyweezel: Mock26: queezyweezel: Mock26: queezyweezel: Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are:

Don't know about asia but in Mexico it's pretty interesting. 75-85 mph on a regular tarred road, only wide enough for two busses to pass . . . but not the mirrors.I forgot something, returned to bus to get it and see four or five drivers trying to fix/replace the missing the mirror on my transport that you could plainly see was wrenched from it's stanchion at speed.Also at lower speed but still a thrilling ride were the rides in Barbados (some, not all), Puerto Rico, most of them, St. Thomas (god I can't stand that place) Antigua was earrrrly in the am so it didn't count and Martinique I was just too loaded to care to look. St Lucia, the roads were so poor that there was no high speed navigation on them. It just wasn't possible. When I was there it took about four hours to go from one end of the island to the other (27 miles).

wow what is with all the pussies complaining about a crash video. this is tame. there is no blood, no gore, and you cant see anyone die. you sound like a bunch of soccer moms. if reality is offensive to you, just kill yourself please. thank you.

My girlfriend watches those ID channel shows about murder, and abuse, and sex crimes, and I have a weird boner writing this, but I still don't like to hear about all that. I'll be more depressed than I regularly am and the urge to kill myself will just be too irresistible.

I feel bad for those Chineses. They should try to drive with their eyes fully open.

Is it just me or does it seem like almost everyone around is a dumbass? (Well, by "everyone" I mean "both drivers".) The bus driver was a dumbass for obvious reasons, but I don't give a pass to the truck driver either. If the bus had been completely stopped I'd say that it was mostly the truck driver's fault. Backing up changes things a bit, but the bus wasn't the vehicle that made up most of that closing speed.

and, yet, it accurately answered queezyweezel's [favorite: Total whining pussy] FarQ question, having been a graphic video of people being stampeded into the ground that made the front page of fark, with no [WARNING: GRAPHIC] tag.

Seriously, queezyweezel you sound like such a goddam snowflake in this thread. Fark the fark right off, ja?

Autoplay or not, the only reason you clicked on the link was so you could watch the video, and you know it. So you deliberately watched a video that you chastised everyone else as "vultures" for watching. You are a racist, woman-hating, lying, hypocritical piece of sh*t.

MadAzza:Autoplay or not, the only reason you clicked on the link was so you could watch the video, and you know it.

queezyweezel is still pretty much a POS for his later comment, but, in his defense, there's nothing in the Fark headline that suggested that the video would be anywhere near as... graphic as it is. (Not sure that's quite the right word, but I can't think of a better one.) There are 1000 things it could have been instead of this. I clicked the link thinking that it'd be something like a video of a giant moose behind a car, or maybe a very close call.

evaned:MadAzza: Autoplay or not, the only reason you clicked on the link was so you could watch the video, and you know it.

queezyweezel is still pretty much a POS for his later comment, but, in his defense, there's nothing in the Fark headline that suggested that the video would be anywhere near as... graphic as it is. (Not sure that's quite the right word, but I can't think of a better one.) There are 1000 things it could have been instead of this. I clicked the link thinking that it'd be something like a video of a giant moose behind a car, or maybe a very close call.

American living in Seoul. Drivers here are farking insane, the only rule is that there are no rules. The bad Asian driver isn't a stereotype, that is literally how they drive here. Hell, for motorcycles, the sidewalk is literally an extension of the road.

evaned:MadAzza: Autoplay or not, the only reason you clicked on the link was so you could watch the video, and you know it.

queezyweezel is still pretty much a POS for his later comment, but, in his defense, there's nothing in the Fark headline that suggested that the video would be anywhere near as... graphic as it is. (Not sure that's quite the right word, but I can't think of a better one.) There are 1000 things it could have been instead of this. I clicked the link thinking that it'd be something like a video of a giant moose behind a car, or maybe a very close call.

queezyweezel:Hmm, when did fark resort to posting snuff videos for page clicks...pretty pathetic. Do we need to ban the Admin that greenlit this crap?

It does need to be said that repeated and extreme violations of Fark's posting rules will result in a permanent posting ban. We don't want to ban users from participating on the site - but it can and will happen if we have to. A site ban is 100% avoidable by following some simple rules. Remember that these rules are non-negotiable and Farkback will not embark on a protracted debate over so-called grey areas. These rules apply to link submissions AND user profiles as well. To that end, here they are: