October 16, 2012– IRAN – If there is a man who brings together all the fears of the West, it is General Mohammed Ali Jafari, commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. Hardened by torture in the prisons of the former Shah, Jafari was among the students who stormed the US Embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, 1979. He later fought in the Iran-Iraq War, and in 2007 Jafari, who has a degree in architecture, assumed command of the Revolutionary Guards, also known as the Pasdaran. The group, founded by revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khamenei to defend the Islamic regime, has since developed into a state within the state. Today the Pasdaran control several companies and are likely a more effective military force than the regular army. Of the 21 ministers in the Iranian cabinet, 13 have completed Pasdaran training. Within this group of hardliners, Jafari, 55, is seen being particularly unyielding. In 2009, for example, he declared that Iran would fire missiles at Israel’s nuclear research center in Dimona if the Israelis attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities — knowing full well that such an attack would result in several thousand deaths on both sides. Now Jafari and his supporters are allegedly preparing new potential horrors. Western intelligence agencies have acquired a plan marked “top secret” and code-named “Murky Water.” Together with Ali Fadawi, an admiral in the Pasdaran, Jafari is thought to have proposed a senseless act of sabotage: to intentionally cause an environmental catastrophe in the Strait of Hormuz.

The goal of the plan seems to be that of contaminating the strait so as to temporarily close the important shipping route for international oil tankers, thereby “punishing” the Arab countries that are hostile to Iran and forcing the West to join Iran in a large-scale cleanup operation — one that might require the temporary suspension of sanctions against Tehran. Western intelligence experts speculate that Jafari’s planned operation is an expression of growing frustration. Contrary to claims made by Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi in an interview with SPIEGEL last week, the embargo imposed on Tehran is causing far more than “discomfort.” Iran derives more than 50 percent of its government revenue from oil exports, which declined from about 2.4 million barrels a day in July 2011 to about 1 million barrels in July 2012. But Iran has only cut back production by less than a quarter, because of the technical complexity and expense involved in temporarily capping wells. Iran can hardly sell its oil because of the embargo. Even countries that don’t feel bound to uphold the sanctions are shying away from deals, because no one wants to insure the oil shipments. The storage tanks on the Iranian mainland have been full for some time, and there are no neighboring countries to which Tehran’s leaders would entrust their treasure. For weeks now, tankers have been carrying 40 million barrels of oil through the Gulf around the clock. Most of the giant 15 VLCC supertankers and five smaller Suezmax ships, sailing under the Iranian flag, have switched off their automatic identification system. This makes it more difficult for foreign spies to detect them, but it also increases the risk of accidents. Countries bordering the Gulf have apparently complained to Tehran about the risky practice several times. –Der Spiegel

I remember the 1st Gulf war in 1991 in that Sadam Hussein ordered oil wells to be set on fire to hamper coalition aircraft from conducting airstrikes and he polluted the northern part of the persian gulf with by releasing oil. Both were environmental disasters.

If Iran wanted to “temporarily” contaminate the strait, then could we be looking a
Biological agent, sink oil tankers in the strait loaded with oil and set the leaking oil afire, a non-persistant chemical agent or explode a dirty bomb.
Any disruption would send prices in the US over 6.00 and California probably 10.00.
The devil and his crew never gets tired………………..

Probably a psy-op lie. I can’t see any way that some spilt oil would stop shipping. If they really wanted to stop the oil passing through the straits all they have to do is tell the insurance companies that they will sink the next crude carrier to try it. They absolutely Can do that, easily, they have anti-ship missiles (notably the “SunBurn” series) that are a real threat to even heavily defended US aircraft carriers, sinking an unarmed, undefended oil tanker would be a piece of cake.

John: I agree – a large oil spill would likely only slow things down for a very short time but not stop tanker transits. However, the sinking of a full tanker (or two) certainly would, but only if it was done at one of the choke points. Problem would be in how to stage it to look like an accident, instead of a belligerent attack as that would prompt a massive strike against the perpetrator. Either way, it’s only a matter of time – Once sanctions really start hurting them, they WILL make good on their threats to close the Straits…

Iran won’t do anything until they are attacked. What would it bring them to shoot first or pollute the shipping lane. NOTHING. Clinton is so getting so frustrated and desperate that nothing is making them move its getting funny to see her loose her cool. Same storey goes for Syria. Why on earth would Assad start shelling Turkey. To better the situation he’s in? Against a neighbor 7 times the strength of his own army. Psy-ops. What the hell happened to common sense!