All posts by David M. Lira

When an employer wants to get additional protection against what former employees might do with knowledge and experienced gained while employed for that employer, the employer might attempt to get its employees to enter into restrictive covenants. An employer can accomplish this Continue reading →

Normally, if you enter into an agreement with another person to do or not do something, a court will enforce that agreement if you violate it, with the assumption that you got some kind of fair exchange in the agreement. So, without knowing anything else, you would think that a court would enforce a restrictive covenant. But that is not necessarily the case Continue reading →

Although there is no law preventing employers from defining other types of restrictive covenants, on this webpage, we’ll discuss only two types: the covenant not to compete (“non-compete”) and the covenant not to solicit (“non-solicitation” provisions).

When you see articles about mediation, or hear attorneys talk about it, you would think that mediation is a new idea. However, there are references to it in the Bible and other ancient texts, in the west and in the east. In other words, it is really an ancient idea that has been re-discovered.

You have started a lawsuit. Your curious: How and when does the court assign a judge? The answer to this questions depends on the court.

In federal court, when a plaintiff files the complaint starting a lawsuit, the court automatically assigns a judge to the case. In some federal districts, such as the Eastern District of New York, the court will also assign a magistrate judge to the case. When a magistrate is assigned, the task assigned to the magistrate is usually to oversee the process of discovery.

In a federal lawsuit, the clerk will inform you of the identity of the assigned judge or judges by writing the names of the judges on the issued summons, and on the complaint returned to the plaintiff on filing. The assignment of judges in federal court is random. However, the residence of the parties is taken into account. For example, if the plaintiff and defendant both reside in Long Island, the case filed by the plaintiff will usually be assigned to a judge having chambers at the Central Islip courthouse, even if the complaint is physically filed in Brooklyn.

With New York State courts, things are a little bit more complicated.

New York State Supreme Court has an individual assignment system (“IAS”). However, no judge is assigned to your case on filing. You don’t get a judge until you have filed a Request for Judicial Intervention (“RJI”). You are not suppose to file an RJI until the case is ready for trial, or unless a dispute, likely involving discovery, has arisen, Once the RJI has been filed, a judge is basically assigned randomly.

The idea behind the IAS is to have a judge intimately involved in the case. The judge is supposed to supervise the case from the time it enters the system through the completion of trial. The degree to which an IAS judge is actually involved in the case depends on the county in which the case is pending, and might depend on the type of case. Certain cases are assigned to Commercial Parts. In these cases, judges might be more involved in the case.

When the IAS judge has little involvement in a case, the case might be treated in much the same way a civil case is treated in a lower state court. In lower state courts, cases are more apt to be assigned to specialized parts, more or less a specific courtroom where certain types of cases at a certain stage of development are heard. Sometimes, a particular judge may preside over a specific part for a long time. In these cases, the judge may effectively function like an IAS judge, at least during that stage of a case’s development, but lower court judges generally have much larger numbers of cases assigned to them, so that the lower court judge may have little recollection of your case when it re-appears on the court’s calendar..