Program Step III: Evaluate HIV Quality Management Program.

Transcription

1 69 Program Step III: Evaluate HIV Quality Management Program. The Big Picture Project Cycle Program Cycle In the same way clinical aspects of care are routinely reviewed and changed, the HIV quality program needs to be continuously and systematically evaluated and improved. The HIV quality committee with participation of a crosssection of staff members evaluates the quality infrastructure and activities to assess what worked well, what did not, and why. The fi ndings are incorporated into future planning efforts to ensure that quality improvements continue and are sustained. What To Do Evaluate QM Program Evaluate HIV quality program effectiveness. Evaluate project team performance. Learn and respond to past performance. Strategize to sustain the quality program. Snapshot of HIV Care Completing the cycle Reflecting on what you ve accomplished many quality management programs successful or unsuccessful often never make it to the third and fi nal step assessing their program s performance and identifying changes to make to improve their quality program. manager. To assist with their own review, the quality committee asked a colleague, not on the quality committee, to help facilitate the evaluation process. We realized we needed some outside help to make sure it got done. We spend so much time looking at other people and their work that we just don t have the energy when we re done with our improvement projects to look at ourselves, explained one quality Another facility turned the tables and enlisted a couple of staff who had not been involved with the quality program to conduct its own independent evaluation of the quality program. Armed NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

2 70 Snapshot of HIV Care...Continued with the quality management plan, workplan, committee agendas, minutes and project team materials, they presented their fi ndings to the committee, staff, consumers and board at both a meeting and through a storyboard posted where the project teams show their information. It was scary, but incredibly fl attering they used our materials and methods to help us improve our own quality, the quality manager reported. One quality committee chair when asked about how her committee had evaluated its plan responded that we never again looked at the plan once we approved it. To ensure that the quality management plan is reviewed, the implementation plan should routinely include its evaluation. Either a special meeting can be scheduled or a regular meeting of the quality committee can be used. Learn from past performance The University of Pittsburg Medical Center learned through their annual evaluation that they needed to fi nd new ways to communicate their quality work. They sought staff input into their annual assessment and the responses indicated that staff were not aware enough of the program to provide the desired feedback this lack of feedback indicated that the quality program needed to better communicate its efforts and to involve more people in the quality project. Build support for your quality program The evaluation process can be used to also garner support for the quality program and to help sustain it. The evaluation process can reveal examples of how the quality program has lead to improvements in the facility s other systems. For example, other committees and departments may model their own communication efforts on the quality committee s sharing of information and creative displays of information. Consumer involvement in the facility s improvement activities may increase as consumers are asked to participate in the quality management program. Staff, board and consumers can be asked to provide their input through a variety of ways. One facility established a message board that encouraged staff and consumers to provide written comments on the quality projects. We had quality committee members write a response to the comment and it was posted back to the message board for everyone to read, reports the quality program manager. It s important that people see that we valued their input. We also observed that people began to read the responses and write new comments to us. It was a great way to provide a mechanism encouraging dialogue. Some of the comments have provided us with great ideas for quality projects, and others haven t really been that helpful. Regardless, we always respond. To respond to this need, a buddy system has been established each quality management committee member has a buddy to inform about the committee s work and to attend meetings if they are not able to. Sharing the quality committee s work throughout the program year helps to build knowledge among staff about the quality efforts so they feel equipped to evaluate the quality program when asked. NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

3 71 Evaluate HIV Quality Management Program Effectiveness. A quality committee needs to spend time thinking about how to evaluate the following key areas of quality management plan and the annual workplan which outlines the implementation process: Quality program infrastructure: Was the quality committee effective in its efforts to improve the quality of HIV care? Does the quality infrastructure require any changes to improve how quality improvement work gets done? Annual quality goals: Were annual quality goals for quality improvement activities met? How effectively did you meet your goals? What were the strengths and limitations? Performance measures: Were the measures appropriate to assess the clinical and non-clinical HIV care in the facility? Are the results in the expected range of performance? Staff and consumer involvement: Did the appropriate staff and consumers participate in quality improvement activities? Were staff informed about ongoing quality activities and about quality improvement methodologies? Were consumers informed about ongoing quality activities? See Snapshot on page 69 to learn how one facility kept everyone involved and informed. Annual workplan: Did the implementation process go as planned? Did you meet established milestones? What were the strengths and limitations? Designing A Program Assessment Tool An assessment tool can be used to guide the evaluation process. If your organization has an existing assessment tool, see if it could be modified to help evaluate the facility s quality management program. If not, consider adapting the HIVQUAL Organizational Assessment Tool on page 72 to evaluate the HIV quality program and the Annual Quality Workplan on page 52 to evaluate the annual implementation process. Evaluate QM Program Additional Resource For the entire HIVQUAL organizational assessment tool, including the scoring criteria, please visit NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

4 72 Toolbox: HIVQUAL Organizational Assessment Tool FUNCTIONS A) QUALITY STRUCTURE SCORE A.1. Does the HIV program have an organizational structure to assess and improve the quality of care? A.2. Were appropriate resources committed to support the HIV quality program? A.3. Did the HIV leadership support the HIV quality program? A.4. Does the HIV quality program have a comprehensive quality plan? B) QUALITY PLANNING B.1. Were annual goals established for the HIV quality program? B.2. Does the HIV program clearly described roles and responsibilities for the HIV quality program? B.3. Did the workplan specify timelines for the implementation of the HIV quality program? C) QUALITY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT C.1. Were appropriate quality indicators selected in the HIV quality program? C.2. Did the HIV program routinely measure the quality of care? D) QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES D.1. Did the HIV program conduct quality projects to improve the quality of care? D.2. Were quality improvement teams formed to improve specific quality aspects? D.3. Are systems in place to sustain quality improvements? E) STAFF INVOLVEMENT E.1. Is the staff routinely educated about quality? E.2. Does the HIV program routinely engage staff in quality program activities? E.3. Are consumers involved in quality-related activities? F) EVALUATION OF QUALITY PROGRAM F.1. Is a process in place to evaluate the HIV quality program? F.2. Does the quality program integrate findings into future planning? G) CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM G.1. Does the HIV program have an information system in place to track patient care and measure quality? (SCALE: 1 = MIN 5 = MAX) NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

5 73 Toolbox: Project Team Assessment Tool EVALUATION QUESTION INFORMATION NEEDED GOAL ACHIEVEMENT To what extent did the improvement team meet its goal? Comparison of the improvement project goal with: Baseline data Pilot test results Follow-up measurement data What resources were needed to achieve the goal? Can the goal be attained more efficiently? Number of team meetings Frequency of team meetings Length of meetings Cost of project materials Number of team members Additional staff time/resources needed to sustain efforts Comparison of expected vs. needed resources to achieve gain Monitoring data on improvement indicators following project completion Evaluate QM Program INTERVENTIONS How effective were the changes over the short term? Statement regarding degree of goal achievement Description of how the interventions helped the patients Comments from staff implementing the interventions How effective were the changes spread throughout the program? Description of the extent to which the program or other parts of the organization were involved in the interventions (e.g., which staff; how they were involved; quality committee involvement; policy changes) How responsive was the program to making these changes? Staff attitude toward the intervention; reasons why favorable or unfavorable. TEAMWORK Did the team composition help the achievement of the improvement objective? Names of team members and disciplines/functions cross referenced with causal factors and staff attitude toward the interventions Did team members have sufficient skill level in making quality improvements to direct their own efforts? Description of project results and the degree of goal achievement Previous exposure and training in quality improvements Degree of comfort with quality improvement tools Did the team run effective meetings? Team members' attendance and participation at meetings NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

6 74 Completing The Program Assessment Real-World Tip Plan For The Evaluation. "Who evaluates the program?" is a key question. To ensure a range of perspectives, the quality committee and a cross-section of staff members and other stakeholders can complete the program assessment. It is best to provide time for quality committee members to complete the assessment individually. Staff should also be invited to voice their assessment of the quality program, a simple survey for all staff members is an effective strategy to solicit their feedback. Upon completion of these assessments, convene a quality committee meeting to discuss the composite responses. Quality committee members should reach consensus about the fi ndings and take appropriate actions. Consider the following ideas to evaluate your HIV quality program: Decide on the areas to evaluate first and then identify the information you need to collect. Reflect the needs of staff, patients and other stakeholders when designing the evaluation process and tools. Assign one or two quality committee members to draft the program evaluation tool. Dedicate a quality committee meeting to reviewing and discussing the evaluation findings. Keep the evaluation tool simple. Make your evaluation cycle coincide with funding cycle reporting. During the process of evaluating the quality program, use the results of the quality program for future planning to shape an effective quality program and update the workplan. Notes Additional Resource For guidance in teaching small groups about the basic activities required to evaluate an HIV quality program, see the HIVQUAL Group Learning Guide "Evaluation of Quality Program" exercise. The exercise could also be used to gear staff members up for their own evaluation cycle. You can download this publication at NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

7 75 Evaluate Project Team Performance. Completing The Project Team Assessment The purpose of project team evaluation is to assess how effectively project teams have succeeded in improving the delivery of care to HIV patients against the initial team charter. There are three main aspects to quality project evaluation: attainment of goals, effectiveness of interventions, and teamwork. Key questions to consider are: Goal achievement. To what extent did the improvement team meet its goal? Can the goal be attained more efficiently? Were the improvements sustained over time? Interventions. How effective were the changes? How effective were the changes spread throughout the program? How responsive was the program to making these changes? What did we learn? Teamwork. Did the team composition help the achievement of the improvement objective? Did team members have sufficient skill level in making quality improvements to direct their own efforts? Did the team run effective meetings? Designing A Project Team Assessment Tool Sometime before the end of the project often at the last team meeting all members of the improvement team should complete the project team assessment. The Toolbox on page 76 provides a modified version of a group interview technique that could be used to collect the evaluation information. It takes little time and displays information related to several of the questions listed in the Improvement Project Team Assessment Tool on page 73. The steps and instructions are written in an agenda format based on the assumption that it is a team meeting. Many facilities fi nd it helpful to gather feedback from consumers about how the interventions affect their HIV care. Ensuring input from those affected by the modified care system will provide a complete picture of the project work. When the project assessment is complete, the improvement team should document the results and submit a copy to the quality committee. The quality committee can review and discuss all the project evaluation data and consider the impact for future planning. Evaluate QM Program Project teams can create or modify an existing assessment tool. The Toolbox on page 73 shows an example of how a facility could gather information to assess the three areas of goal achievement, interventions and teamwork. The Toolbox on page 141 provides another approach for project teams to evaluate project team performance. NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

8 76 Toolbox: Agenda for Project Team Assessment Date: October 22, 2005 Project team members present: John Waters, Michele Goss, Michael Sacks Invited guests: Susan Rodrigues (Medical Director) Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of the project team efforts AGENDA TIME 5 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes ACTIVITY Introduce the purpose of the meeting. Review the agenda. Discussion of project team performance. 1. Brainstorm a list of factors that helped us achieve the goals of the project. 2. Brainstorm a list of factors that hindered us from achieving a higher performance. 3. For each list, identify the most significant factors by voting. 4. Re-write a new list with the factors that received the most votes. 5. Discuss each factor in greater detail. Make recommendations to the quality committee on the following: Future goal setting for this project. Team effectiveness/efficiency for future teams. Sustaining interventions. 5 minutes Summarize and discuss next steps. NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

9 77 Learn From And Respond To Past Performance. Assessing Impact Evaluation results can help the quality committee to identify critical issues for future planning. Reviewing Data To maximize the lessons learned from evaluation data, the committee should review all program and project evaluation results and identify common themes or problems. Additional data (such as audit results or quality evaluations performed by external agencies) can be used to supplement the internal program and project evaluations and may help to identify future improvement opportunities. In reviewing the data and linking them to overall program objectives, the quality committee assesses the impact on the HIV program and compiles a list of critical issues to be addressed during the upcoming annual planning process. The past performance of the quality management program can be used to learn lessons for future quality activities and how to best adapt the quality infrastructure. Those steps can include changes to the existing quality program by adapting annual goals and performance measures or changes to the annual workplan. It is critical to immediately take action while the evaluation results are still fresh in the minds of the quality committee. Evaluate QM Program Notes Additional Resource Review the HIVQUAL Group Learning Guide "Team Self Evaluation" exercise as it describes the important opportunity for teams to discuss the positive aspects of their group interactions along with the areas that need improvement. In this way, team members help to build a "template" for success for future team projects for their own evaluation cycle. You can download this publication at NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

10 78 Strategize To Sustain The HIV Quality Program. Communicate Program Success The key to sustaining the HIV-specific quality program over time is to make quality improvement an integral part of the program s daily acitivities. Taking appropriate actions to sustain the efforts of the quality committee helps to avoid the pitfall of taking two steps forward, one step back. The quality committee employs the following strategies: Clear lines of accountability Spread the ownership of the quality program Communicate program success Routinely assess quality program Clear Lines Of Accountability The quality committee maps a clear structure of the HIV quality program, including the staff s roles and responsibilities. Quality improvement activities are incorporated as part of everyone s job description and job expectations. This increases staff awareness and links them directly into the quality program. Spread The Ownership Of The Quality Program Quality activities should be embraced by every staff member in order for the HIV quality program to be sustained over time. Explain that all staff members are part of the quality management program and, in order to succeed, the quality program takes root through their involvement. The goals and ongoing activities of the quality program are routinely communicated with staff. The key messages about quality should be doggedly repeated over and over, and reinforced at every opportunity. Communicating successes of the HIV quality program widens the program s base of support. Techniques include: Develop a system for staff reward and recognition Champion staff through internal and external promotion of success stories Showcase successes visually in facility Exchange "best practices" with other HIV programs Real-World Tip Broaden The Support For Quality. Look for ways to create buy-in for ongoing quality of care improvements throughout the HIV facility: Identify patients who can provide testimonials about the effects interventions had on patient care. Routinely survey staff and consumers about their needs and review at the quality committee. Train all new staff members about quality improvement activities at the facility. Encourage staff members to become experts in quality improvement; publicly recognize their efforts. Involve staff in the decision-making and prioritization of future improvement goals. NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

11 79 Toolbox: Tips for Different HIV Program Types Recognizing different service delivery models for HIV care, the following table highlights how several delivery systems can evaluate the HIV-specific quality program. SMALL HIV PROGRAMS Devote one quality committee meeting to evaluate the entire quality program since the same staff members participate on the quality committee and on project teams. Use pre-existing forms as much as possible (e.g., HIVQUAL Organizational Assessment Form page 72) to facilitate evaluation process. Take advantage of the small size of the HIV program and plan future quality activities right away based on the evaluation results. HIV NETWORKS Evaluate QM Program Create assessment forms that are consistent across the network for the sake of comparison and peer-learning. Organize a special meeting with network representatives to assess the network performance including individual site performance; add measures to assess the performance of the entire network. ADVANCED HIV PROGRAMS Present evaluation findings to the Consumer Advisory Committee and ask consumers for their input. Create a survey for all staff members to assess the quality program: Generate ideas for future quality management plans. Use findings to make adjustments to the quality management plan. NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

12 80 Routinely Assess Quality Program To effectively know whether the HIV program meets its goals, the quality committee routinely assesses the overall performance of the quality program. To keep this strategy alive, it is important to: Re-assess performance at pre-established intervals Review evaluation data regularly Respond to the fi ndings in an immediate and systematic manner The Workbook describes in Project Step 6 on page 136 the details of how to sustain improvements made by quality improvement project teams. Real-World Tip Incorporate Quality Into The Fabric Of The Facility. The following strategies are helpful to sustain gains made by the quality committee: Make quality improvement part of staff members job descriptions and expectations. Incorporate quality concepts into training of new staff members. Provide ongoing quality training opportunities for existing staff. Provide opportunities for all staff to participate in quality improvement projects. Incorporate best practices identified during quality projects into daily processes. Reward successes of quality activities. Notes Additional Resource For guidance in teaching small groups about the importance of sustainability to an HIV quality program s long-term success and how to improve sustainability, see the HIVQUAL Group Learning Guide "Sustainability of Quality Program" exercise. The exercise could also be used to document practical ideas for improving your program s sustainability. You can download this publication at NYSDOH AI HIVQUAL Workbook September 2006

28 Program Step I: Develop and Plan a Quality Management Program The Big Picture: Project Cycle Program Cycle Quality management programs are most successful when led and supported by the leadership of

Strategic Planning A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR UNITS AND DEPARTMENTS Contents 1. What is strategic planning?... 2 2. Strategic Planning at Faculty of Medicine where are we?... 3 3. The Faculty of Medicine Strategic

The Power of Shared Decision Making What is Shared Decision Making Point of Service Decision Making - where staff who perform the work participate in decision making affecting their environment A 30 year

Board Development (Not bored of development) PARTICIPANT WORKBOOK Created and facilitated by: Lynda Gerty, Engagement Director Last update March 2014 2014 Property of Vantage Point Not to be reproduced

Alliance Scorecarding and Performance Management at TechCo A Vantage Partners Case Study With the assistance of Vantage Partners, TechCo, a microelectronics company based in California, developed and implemented

Safe and Healthy Minnesota Students Planning and Evaluation Toolkit AUGUST 2008 Safe and Healthy Minnesota Students Planning and Evaluation Toolkit Tips, techniques, and resources for planning and evaluating

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice

Stakeholder Engagement Working Group Stakeholder Engagement: Planning and Budget Resource December 2015 Purpose: This resource was developed as part of the Society of Practitioners of Health Impact Assessment

Achieving Results Through Genuine Leadership TM T R A I N I N G Struggling daily with tough business issues and essential goals, organizations are prepared when genuine leaders are eager to live out the

Elmira City School District Every Student Succeeds Communication Plan 2007-08 Elmira City School District 951 Hoffman Street Elmira, NY 14905 2 School Communications C ommunication is defined as the exchange

Washington County Public Health Division Performance Management and Quality Improvement Plan Plan developed by the PMQI Council Prepared by Erin Mowlds and Chelsea Larsen Adopted on 8/7/2014 1 TABLE OF

184 Participant training objectives: To understand the importance of post-improvement project team evaluation To be able to use a self evaluation tool to assess team performance To be able to make improvement

Analyst Position Description September 4, 2015 Analysis Position Description September 4, 2015 Page i Table of Contents General Characteristics... 1 Career Path... 2 Explanation of Proficiency Level Definitions...

Changing the Way People Use Technology City Clerks Association of California Records and Information Management Presentation April 22, 2015 Session Objectives Learning the phases of Change Management Understanding

Effective Employee Incentive Programs Bring Out The Best In Your Firm By Lisa A. Rozycki 2006 All Rights Reserved An incentive program is a planned activity designed to motivate people to achieve predetermined

Building Successful Master Data Management Teams The role and importance of partnerships between business and IT in MDM strategy White Paper sponsored by Aligning Business and IT to Improve Performance

GUIDE TO A GREAT CAMPAIGN 2014 SEASON United Way of Westmoreland County UnitedWay4u.org Campaign Strategies for Success: Proven Best Practices Whether you're running your very first campaign for the United

Quality Improvement Plan A plan for improving efficiency and effectiveness in all services, programs, and processes. May December 2014 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Definitions 4 Quality Improvement

Chapter 2 Establishing a Quality Assurance and Improvement Program O v e rv i e w IIA Practice Guide, Quality Assurance and Improvement Program, states that Quality should be built in to, and not on to,

Leadership D e v e l o p m e n t Your Guide to Starting a Program This publication is produced by the Leadership Education and Training Division of Rotary International. If you have questions or comments,

Governance Guidelines Board of Trustees Policy Original release: October 2004 Current release: January 2014 Purpose The following guidelines ( Governance Guidelines or Guidelines ) are intended to assist

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Planning & Goal Setting To whom much is given, much is expected. Leadership Development Series Summer 2011 Areas We Will Cover Today 1. Discuss our collective lessons and learnings

Component 4: Organizational Leadership & Governance Scope: Lead your local United Way to successfully fulfill its mission, and in doing so, garner trust, legitimacy and support from the local community

What is Quality Schools Development? Why are we doing this? All students deserve quality schools in their neighborhoods that help them thrive academically, socially, and emotionally. Right now, several

The Performance & Learning Plan and Year End Performance Evaluation Process Overview: Employee Guide The Performance & Learning Plan (PLP) and Year End Performance Evaluation (YEP) Processes together form

Public Document 3 Purpose: Outlines the standards that are the foundation for the evaluation. Name of Superintendent: Date: Performance Rating Scale: Distinguished (4) Accomplished (3) standards for most

Summary of the Qualitative Decision Support Model 7 STEPS TOWARDS AGENDA This Qualitative Decision Support Model, the Generic Transformation Agenda, has been developed during the TRANSFORM project between

360 FEEDBACK: DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM 3 PROGRAM OVERVIEW About the Training Program During recent years, organizations have sought new ways to develop performancemanagement systems that help employees

Foundation Standard (F): The professional school counselor plans and organizes the foundation of a standards-based, data-driven comprehensive school counseling program that is aligned with the school strategic

Designing Interactive Webinars Principles & Practice A Facilitator s Perspective 2 From Push to Pull: The Rationale for Interactive Webinars As a facilitator and trainer working primarily in the virtual

United Way Campaign Guide Executive Summary for Employee Campaign Managers PREPARE FOOD Meet with your CEO Recruit your Campaign Team Learn about United Way and the community s Agenda for Change PLAN Analyze

QUALITY TOOLBOX Creating a Complete Business Management System Many organizations have separate environmental management and occupational, health, and safety management systems. They are defined as being

4.1 Describe the formal and informal performance appraisal processes used in the organization, including self-appraisal, peer review, and 360 o evaluation (as appropriate) for all levels in the organization.

College Credit College Ready Skills (High School) Course of Study NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College Students are tracked according to past performance into regular and honors level courses. All

Using Evaluation to Improve Programs Strategic Planning www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation PROGRAM STRATEGIC PLANNING KIT Table of Contents Introduction Part 1: What is strategic planning? Part 2: What

PROGRAM Our design process, philosophy and values. Program Design and Development is one of our core services in which we work with faculty to design and develop courses that are part of a new or redesigned

Leadership Development Best Practices By Russel Horwitz 1 December 2014 Contents The case for leadership development 4 Creating a strategy 4 Best practices 5 1. Align to organizational strategy 5 Begin

Communicating Company Values 2 Client: GAF 2013 (currently in progress) 3 Communication Plan VZ Communications developed the communication plan and tactics for this initiative which began in January 2013