I think we're good on this one.
Mez
Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
04/17/2007 08:28 AM
Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
To
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
cc
Subject
ISSUE-63: consistency is good where it fits; it doesn\'t always fit; so
undergird your consistency with a model (public comment)
ISSUE-63: consistency is good where it fits; it doesn't always fit; so
undergird your consistency with a model (public comment)
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/63
Raised by: Bill Doyle
On product: Note: use cases etc.
>From public comments
raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.orghttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-
authentication/2007Apr/0000.html
consistency is good where it fits; it doesn't always fit; so undergird
your
consistency with a model
where it says, in 10.1.11 Consistency
The cues should be displayed consistently in location and across
sites and browsers in an attempt to prevent spoofing and user
confusion.
please consider
Yes, you are going to publish good presentation practice.
On the other hand, the deliverables need to create a semantic platform
in terms of what the user should understand, and the evidence bearing on
decisions that they have available to make. Capturing this into a
reliable
model and encoding is essential for equal access for people with
disabilities.
Why?
There is no one presentation that works for all. Discussed above/already.