To create a greater understanding of men and women and our struggle in todays society, specifically The United States. Please feel free to contribute and offer your own writings and information in the comments section.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

VAWA is up for renewal. Women want protection
for illegal immigrants, Native Americans, gay men, lesbian women and
heterosexual women but not heterosexual men. If VAWA is a just law we
must ask ourselves what the impetus is behind excluding certain classes
of citizen from the equal protection clause of The Constitution of The
United States.

The reason they want this is because VAWA is not a just
law and thus by excluding citizens based on gender and sexual
orientation they seek to leverage the advantage of the removal of due
process and removal of equal protection against the excluded class of American i.e. heterosexual men. One
can only conclude that women are willing to trade the Liberty and
Justice of others to benefit themselves. I do not respect women or their
union for pushing such a proposal. As women are the most powerful
special interest group and the largest voting block in the nation, I
believe they will succeed in their endeavor against the rights of our
people.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

I enjoyed Barbarossaaaa's take on it. To me he clarifies some of the difference in MRA and MGTOW thinking. He takes a clear MGTOW standpoint. The conservative effort to belittle
men for not "manning up" to solve what women have destroyed is
insulting. They are trying to shame men out of the path to our own
solution. He makes the argument that men as a class can not contend with the female political class nor the State. The two operate in synergy and serve to compound the ends to which the MRA believes can be contended with and resolved. MGTOW advocates for the independence and liberation of men. Male independence and liberation may not be what women want...(as evidenced by the myriad of "man up" "child man" type articles in mainstream news outlets) but it is certainly what they asked for.

What men are increasingly realizing and what the articles suggest to me is that men realize that there is nothing offered us worthy to "man up" to in relation to the traditional construct and as such the only person we owe anything to is ourselves. MGTOW takes the view that the family and men's place within it has been destroyed both structurally in the requisites designed to invoke the creation of it but also within it. MGTOW is male sovereignty. As he stated, many men are not even aware of the MRA or MGTOW but they are making decisions in their lives related to male liberation philosophy. As he said, the male withdraw is organic and for many, though they may not be aware of the source of the problem, nor attempt to understand and resolve the issues facing us as the MRA and even MGTOW attempt to do......men are voting with their feet.

Obama's White House is a 'hostile environment for females that treats women like meat'

Women should not be allowed to discuss important matters in the White House for this reason. Women identify through their entitlement complex as a woman first and as an adult second. This is manifested through the classic female victimhood moniker they stamp and certify on every statement from their mouths through damsel in distress hypoagency. It is how women get what they want.

As soon as they open their mouths to complain simply have them removed from the room. When they attempt to say something simply say AHHHH to interrupt and inform the complaining womanchild that "the men are talking".... point your finger to the door and with firm authority say "OUT". Tell them to attend their own female council, draw up their long list of female complaints as to what it is that women want now and the men will consider whether the female demands are gynocentric nonsense or something men should address. Always attend to the most pressing matters first then what ever it is that women are complaining about now.

Tell them you will be more than happy to treat them as a piece of meat later but for now the men are discussing business and do not have time to acknowledge moody, under serviced hussy bitchiness. You will be more than happy to take them to a nice dinner and give em a good pounding later.

Left Wants To Arrest Men Who Pee Standing!

Shit
testing men to see how far we will go for them is female nature. It's
how they test you for beta male tendencies. Give women political and
State power and this is what happens. Sweden is one of if not THE most
ardent gynocracy on the face of the planet. Women insisted and even
succeed in removing the penis from a lion symbol of a Swedish military
brigade's mascot. I shit you not.

Basically this behavior is one of the
more primitive aspects of the female primordial hind brain. If you are
willing to hand over your wallet and your left nut for the opportunity to
reproduce you have desperate beta male written on your forehead. When women are given power directly, there is not alpha male checks and balances to keep their demands in check. The State can't say NO to female hypergamous shit tests. Women are biologically programmed to keep pushing and pushing and pushing. It is a filter mechanism for female hypergamy to weed out beta male pussy begging supplicators. This behavior when manifested through the State and by collective female political agency is nothing less than disastrous.

Friday, May 25, 2012

Do not be fooled...The child like face of women along with their child like voice is a weapon, this picture is frightening and violent. The caption mentions 'just because there are no tears' doesn't mean woman is not vulnerable, entitled and becomes so in actuality. Her power of manipulation and deception are validated. "Women are never stronger than when they arm themselves with their weaknesses." ~Marie de Vichy-Chamrond

If this woman ever came for me armed as she is, you would hear the sound of a long metal sheen resonate as I draw a sword and point it in defense. I'd keep her approach and her healthy distance firmly directed toward the point.

Hark!
Why come the here woman, what is thy bidding of me? "I want your
courtship and undying love, your dedication to me so that we may bear
fruits of our trust, we may have children and live sovereign and
consecrate ever after. I want you to place me high upon your steed,
to shoulder the burden that is me.....I revel to enthrall thee, to implore your will to call to me, convince you to lay it all to me, that
what I offer ye for all to see is worthy of sacrifice and this is why I act so nice"

There is no consecrate mutual trust here. Go...to the tyrant upon the hill, he is your husband now. Leave me, leave me upon this grassy knoll where the birds still sing, the fruits of labor bared forth by my body are still my own and the dalliances of children mine still run through the dreams of my heart. It is there they are real.

You are a farse to me now, the hollow whore of the tyrant. Your vows lay there within the commiserate vacuous heart of the tyrants greed. Go now woman, to the cold outstretched arms of the tyrant upon the hill...he is your husband now. You have surrendered all of our mutual consecrate trust to him. The sovereign bond of which you speak is not here. Follow your weakness woman, follow it to he to whom you've laid yourself bare, to he to whom you've so willfully bequeathed your vulnerability, your burden.....upon the alter of my sacrifice, follow it until you reach his arms.

It is his bed in which you sleep and by his sword through which you reap. I will not place you upon my steed, it is his children of which you breed. In you I will not plant my seed, my loins, my labor you will not feed, I will not honor your unfaithful deed, I will not fill your consummate greed, a vanquished bond we share indeed.

Go to him upon the hill, seek your needs he doth fulfill, lay with him in sacrosanct, it is he with whom your heart has banked. Stay with him upon the hill, bridle your soul to the unfulfilled. Surrendered to be the matron of State, a slave of me you seek to make, in the tyrant's fields you consummate, a whore of you hath ye doth make. The toils of mine you will not rake, in this, in you I have no stake...now, in yore and ever more...Your betrayal hast begotten you, a sullied fruit that rots in you, a virtue that is lost in you...now, in yore and ever more.

Monday, May 21, 2012

Good news... I've found a better way to employ my convictions. I will soon be working to train horses to work with troubled children who have come of age from the family of a single mother whore and those from govt. foster care who were given up for adoption.....many of them at birth. These young people are the primary demographic referred to the program. I stopped by and things look good. Should be able to volunteer in 2 more weeks. Unplanned and even planned pregnancy from uncommitted alpha cock is the norm under matriarchy.

Women can't help but follow the gina tingles much of the entirety of their fertile years. Near 30 years old they will look for a committed "beta" i.e. a man on their level who is committed to them. However, I believe they may not be looking for this on a conscious level, they are simply forced to face their actual market value and settle. Many have a fatherless bastard in tow at this point. Don't date them...let em rot.

I remember reading an article from a female dating coach \ match service specialist. She informed the women, I know you were getting with 8-10s in your prime but you are getting older and now you will have to settle for a partner you actually qualify for and this means a 5-6 and if you continue to wait....a 2-3. We have to understand that the numbers of measurement are all relative. This is to say that all women can get with an 8-10 relative to their mate value in their prime years. Many repeat this pattern over and over and don't understand why they can't secure a commitment.

Remember, women want genes and resources. Feminism is simply base female animal nature given license. When feminism becomes the values of a society... abortion, fatherless children, single mother whores along with divorced and broken homes under the new marriage 2.0 laws becomes normalized.

The deluded women in this society do not understand why above par men show interest in them, maintain relationships with them and f**k them on a regular basis but won't commit. Many a deluded woman will get knocked up or deceptively commit paternity fraud by telling an unwitting man she is on birth control because she may hope for more or simply want what she wants....an 8-10....or at very least his genes. "Single mother by choice" is empowering. Many don't give the bastard child up for adoption or have an abortion because they know which gender is fully responsible for sex and conception and who will have to pay for it. Others, having some sort of conscience, (not a moral conscience mind you) after their plan to secure such a man fails they have an abortion or give the child up for adoption. Abortion is the perfect solution to many female behaviors, it gives them license.

They become jaded and bitter against men as a result of these relationships. Many of the potential ramifications of these relationships thankfully are avoided when the relationship is ended but sadly, to many do not end before an unfortunate life is brought into the world. Hypergamously induced pump and dump becomes the norm and in many of these cases it is the woman who eventually ends the relationship because men are quite content to maintain and even seek and create such relationships. She eventually gets the idea.

Look lower liberated woman, look to your level and you will find those men you think you are above. Your artificial ability to control conception along with the artificial leverage the resulting sex dynamic brings places you firmly into the cold arms of the consummate man that meets that leverage.

Remember, alpha male is relative. In this respect all men are alpha relative to the mind of the women who are currently f**king them. So, the pattern I've outlined is something myself and the majority of men experience with women.

The female primordial brain hasn't caught up to our artificially and technologically enabled dystopian reality. Human reason, particularly among women, does not account for the advent of contraception and how it changes relationships and the mating dynamic within our new paradigm. Believe it or not, without contraception men are choosy who we will have sex with and who we will maintain relationships with. Women would know quite clearly who they qualify for. The same is true when women avoid promiscuity.

Sadly though, it is now a race to the bottom for women. The pussy flood gates are open and many women contrary to ascertaining a man's true interests in her are instead willing to lower the bar and do so quickly thinking they must in order to keep a man. In other instances women will spread right away on the first date for other reasons. This has happened to myself and enough friends of mine to know what it looks like out there. Abstaining from calling these men alphas....including myself, I will say that it is well known in the manosphere that women will forgo commitment from a "beta" for 1 minute of alpha cock i.e. alpha being a relative term this means any man above their station. Today's woman is blinded between the desirable man they are dating and that bangs them on a regular basis and a man who they can actually obtain and who they are actually eligible to secure commitment from.

Today's woman is caught in a paradox between who their gina tingles lead them to and who they are actually eligible for. It is their one and only filter to ascertain their value on the mating market. That filter is way past gone now a days.

You have opened the gates of your own delusion woman and for this you will suffer...Entitlement induced by delusion is your guide and your demeanor. Women do not know their own station, their own actual mate value. You are now flying blind in the mating game. However, I believe your bastard children once turned out into the world and reaching the point where they are referred to this therapy program should not have to suffer any longer.

Come discarded ones, you ailing wounded children of whoredom. Take my hand, find beauty and connection to the love left for you. I will not betray you and neither will the beautiful soul of these animals. We will not abandon you oh children of whores.

These lives might as well have been aborted but since they are still breathing I want to help them. Many have trouble holding jobs and deal with a world they view as hostile, cold and unloving. I will open my heart to you discarded children of whores. I will not speak of the horror I speak of here on my blog to you. I will bring you hope and love. We will bring each other hope for a better world.

These young children and young adults coming into this world see the world as an unloving place where even their own mother will abandon them. Men should know that in many states when the mother decides to give the child up you can not plead to take the child...how about that you sperm donor, you walking wallet piece of shit. This society does not honor fatherhood. I will do my best to help them. I will love them and give them confidence in a world of women that separate them from their father or were abandoned all together into foster care. I will help them and so will the horses. They deserve a fighting chance. It is not their fault they were born into such a world. God willing let me bring good to their lives.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

My brother is doing his child support worksheet right here as we speak. The more children his ex has with her new husband the more my brother has to pay her every month. Let this sink into your mind for a moment......

I will make it perfectly clear....I do not value the institution of marriage and the liability a man bears to a woman. I will not commit to such a thing and I do not respect women nor fatherhood. I am a Men's Rights Activist and I do not stand alone in this. I am MGTOW. I fight for my countrymen and I fight for my country. I fight for our very dignity. I fight for Independence, Liberty and Freedom. I fight for the right to our bodies and the fruits of its labor. I will never surrender.

Just so you know, my brother emptied his life savings of $120,000 to gain 51% parental time with his son. He provides child support by being a father....yet he owes this w****. Women you have made yourselves devalued, you have made yourselves prostitutes. You have reduced marriage to whoredom and I do not respect you. What have we here? What has my nation become? What is there to believe in? Men....know now what to believe in. Men know now what we must do and do it together.

Update: I found this video that supports the feminist \ default female viewpoint on why the above occurs: So, what women are saying is that men must pay for women to increase their genetic fitness. It is now true that by marriage 2.0 laws women enacted that they bear no liability to men. You are kept as a guest within the matriarchal family so long as you are useful. When disposed of you must pay to subsidize any offspring she has in the future as well. This is the price men must pay if they want to reproduce. They must submit.

To women, it is only rightful since it is a privilege to be selected for a mere male to have access to reproduction. He should consider himself lucky. This is the one and only thing women bring to the table i.e. the right to have a fatherless bastard. It is purported as worth it for men to support the matriarchal family for this reason. This is all very interesting and gives us insight into how women think and likewise how the female majority have instructed the system to enact these laws.

It also gives us insight into what constitutes "alpha" in the primordial female mind. Any prior male she mates with is beta and any current male is "alpha". In the female mind, any man that reproduces is the "alpha" of the moment and not so once he is discarded. In other words, it is relative. I find this interesting since it has been my observation that female reasoning is based in the relative and subjective realm. It is manifested as something that is always relative to the self and not objective by any measure. One central tenet of Matriarchy is the advent of subsidized serial polyandry. This is what is of central value to a matriarchal construct. If the matriline is unable to support itself the burden is then placed upon men who have been discarded from the family and also the burden of government. Again, this is the central value of a matriarchal society, to support the increase of the female organisms genetic fitness by way of serial polyandry.

Fatherhood is non existent under matriarchy. To learn more about what women are building please see Anatomy of Matriarchy.

Friday, May 18, 2012

House passes VAWA reforms!

WASHINGTON
/ May 17, 2012 – The House of Representatives has passed the
reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act by a 222-205 margin.
Responding to public discontent, H.R. 4970 contains a number of measures
designed to curb widespread waste and fraud in the domestic violence
field.
A recent U.S. News poll found a strong majority of persons
are opposed to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in its current
form: See Here Many women have questioned the effectiveness and fairness of the existing VAWA law: See Here

Reforms
contained H.R. 4970 include strong accountability measures,
gender-inclusive language, and provisions to stem fraudulent claims of
abuse by immigrants. The current VAWA law has invited immigration fraud
by not allowing the US citizen accused of abuse to submit evidence that
could refute the accusation.

The White House played an active role
in opposing the bill. The Obama Administration issued a Statement of
Administration Policy on Tuesday stating it would veto any bill that was
modeled on H.R. 4970.
During Wednesday’s floor debate, sponsor
Sandy Adams (R-FL) withstood numerous challenges. When informed by John
Conyers (D-MI) that numerous organizations opposed her bill, she
retorted, “Shame on them!”

Following passage of the bill, a number
of established domestic violence organizations have reacted with anger
and implied threats. The National Task Force to End Sexual and Domestic
Violence Against Women called the bill “dangerous.” The National
Organization for Women charged that Representatives who voted for the
bill “will be judged in the public arena and at the polls in November.”
According
to SAVE spokesman Philip W. Cook, “H.R. 4970 certainly is not a perfect
bill. Still, passage of the House measure is a victory for victims who
have been refused service in the past. It removes most sex
discriminatory language. It is also a victory for taxpayers who are
tired of the ongoing reports of waste and fraud.”

From the comments section: Anonymous said:

"Hold on there, Sparky. Our president is an open feminist. He has
promised to veto the bill.I hope he does it and very soon,so people have
one more reason to not vote for him.

This was a step in the
right direction,but we ain't out of the woods yet.We're going to have a
lot of painful ups and downs between here and there,but we'll make it.
We're salty. And we're not going away any time soon."

Update: This is very true. The opposition has stated openly that it detests the idea that heterosexual males will be given equal protection under law. They seek to remove them from protection and instead add other classes of American i.e. gay\lesbian, illegal immigrant \non citizen immigrant and Native Americans. We will see if this happens.

SAVE thanks the
many organizations and individuals who have supported VAWA reform
efforts. SAVE will continue to work for ways to reform and strengthen
the Violence Against Women Act: www.saveservices.org/pvra .

Stop
Abusive and Violent Environments is a victim-advocacy organization
working for evidence-based solutions to partner abuse:
www.saveservices.org

A sincere thank you goes out to all Men's Rights activists who spread the word and took action during our raising awareness campaign! This was a tremendous effort and our work paid off. Feminists are so angry I can't even tell you how angry they are. Thank you all for your support.

If the Fair Pay Act is ever passed here is my suggestion to those of you who own a business. First, I suppose the wage socialization bill will not cover men. In this case it will be a liability for employers to give men raises or to hire them at a fair market competitive wage. Any company that pays men on merit, work ethic or prior and thus existing fair market wage value will pay the price for it. It will be a liability to attempt this.

In the future, if you do not mitigate your risk then the incentive is for wages to be collectively confiscated from men then socialized and redistributed to women. This redistribution is an applicable way to mitigate risk BUT it is not competitive and thus not tenable. You will be paying workers based on liability and not free market principal. To do so is not good for business. It is essential to recognize that men and male production are no longer applicable to the free market.

So in order to maintaining a free market is important to recognize there will be NO liability for employers to pay women competitive wages, to give them raises or to pay them differently Therefore, in order to maintain a free market paradigm it is best that no male workers be hired and if they are, keep them outsourced. This will allow you to remain competitive. In no short order however the entire male labor pool will experience a lowering of their wages after the bill is passed. This will take time. At this time you can then begin to extract this labor value by paying them less than a female worker. Feel free to hire males at this point but never allow them to be compensated based on free market principals. Men will accept lower wages over time. Their experience of compensation is relative.

However, if your core infrastructure is in a typically male field of business and men are essential to populate the ranks of core infrastructure, make sure to outsource your female workers so as to maintain gender segregation. This will lower your liabilities and raise your ability for free market competition for the male worker base you maintain.

My best suggestion to
employers would be to stratify their labor pool among outsource
companies according to which gender predominates your sector of business. In the beginning, after this law is passed, any workers brought into the core infrastructure
as direct hire must be female if at all possible. The reason being is that you can pay your female direct hire
employees different wages according to merit, work ethic and free market
value. As stated before however, when the market catches up to the liability placed on giving males free market wages, this will make male workers cheaper to hire for the same work. It is at this point that male wages will be lowered overall INCLUDING in relation to your female workers who are still compensated according to free market principals.

Until the stabilization and redistribution of wealth to females takes place, do not hire males.
Maintaining free market economics within your core infrastructure is
crucial for productivity and market competition. The principals of free market economics and efficiencies will only apply to the female labor pool. This must be used to your advantage. Remember that applying free market value to male production before the redistribution takes place it is not good for business. After the redistribution of wealth to females takes place and male wages are driven down across the labor market you may begin to hire the newly created male underclass of workers at a lower price than the non marginalized female labor pool. More on liability based socialization of wages can be found in the complimentary article HERE

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Below: A poem to all the walking wounded, to the dead, to the fallout from feminist utopia, the brainwashed boys, the lost generations, the neglect of the nations young men, the destruction of family, discarded and exploited men, death of marriage and fatherhood, the execution and death of masculine identity and masculine culture, masculine value, the disrespect and death of male honor, fatherless boys, the feminist school system, the false guilt, the self hatred, the poisoned minds, the lies, the desecrated self made female sex object, the disease, the new lives extinguished, the female hedons, the vile, the feminist government, to the vile single mother crafted emasculated masculinity, to the lost and confused, the fatherless wanderers on the feminist battlefield. To the dead, latchkey kids, the suicides and school shooters. To the death of commitment and a sacred bond desecrated and destroyed, the forced male laborers, the feminist gulags of the enslaved...the death camp society of feminist utopia, the feminist prison and the abyss.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

I was reading some Gallup Poll data. I find it interesting that the largest differentiating factor in how much women support the current democratic President is defined by whether women are married or single. The majority of single or divorced women support the president where as the majority of married women do not support him. This tells us much about women. There are many possible things that can be inferred from this.

Important to note is that the same separation of support was also found by women's varying support between Republican \ Independent and Democratic parties based on the same variable, single or married. Suffice as to say that one can conclude the single largest difference in women's voting disposition is directly related to who shows more promise in providing to them at the moment, an actual husband or government husband and furthermore which party provides to them the most.

Suffice as to say that I believe the difference relates directly to whomever is providing them protections, provisions and resources. Divorced women are in the middle. They are single again but feel more reliant on the government i.e. the more socialist \ matriarchal \ feminist Democratic party. I believe they are represented in the middle rather than realigning with single never married women because divorced women still obtain resources from the man they removed from the family and the lives of his children. It is true however that age also affects the vote across gender lines. The young are typically more in support of the idealism of the socialist Democratic party. So I surmise that this is also a reason that divorced women, typically being in the older bracket as measured by the voting demographic as a whole, are represented in the middle rather than realigning with single never married women.

Women have a very different and in my opinion dangerous relationship to the alpha status of State. It is this relationship that increases, consolidates and centralizes power to the State. This of course is an element of what creates a matriarchal feminist State and society. As strange as it might seem, in observing the photo above I am compelled to believe these women most likely are in some stage of sexual arousal. I believe a Photoplethysmography probe would most certainly show increased engorgement of the vaginal tissues and an associated increase in lubrication. These women look like they are at a rock concert looking on in adoration and attraction to the alpha male on stage. Groupies are a female phenomenon. I've heard female musicians speak about the fact that no female musician has male groupies. This is because males have different requisites that are something other than a high status female.

These women would most certainly copulate with the President. Women's relationship to State is a dangerous one and one that we are paying the price for now through the implementation of female agency through feminism. Women's relationship with State is directly relative to their relationship with men. One can say that as the State becomes more female focused with government husbandry as advocated by feminism, as the state increasingly supports matriarchy, the less likely women are to form or maintain married relationships with men. They will increasingly gravitate to the State to meet these requisites.

I see feminism and feminist advocacy as not something separate from women themselves but the name given to what is the collective action of female political and social agency. All women are feminists in this respect. Women have a propensity and predisposition for the implementation of it and it is relative directly to their personal relationships with males. For the first time in American history there are more single never married and divorced women than married couples in this country and the demographic is increasing as marriage is on the decline. The growing amount of single and divorced women are literally a separate socio-political and socio-economic class, and as the data implies, this class will increasingly be of a feminist gynocentric disposition.

I believe due to the divide between men and women as separate classes with separate class interests or rather, a divide between the family and single\divorced women, we may have reached an event horizon at which the female majority vote which is ALSO the majority vote overall, will lead the nation to the continued centralization of power and to the increased size and scope of the State. This is to say that it will increasingly become a feminist, female favoring, female focused, matriarchal, socialist State. As they already have done, women will increasingly direct resources and policy toward the benefit of females at the expense of men and boys in education, healthcare, the judicial system, family law etc. This is already the case. I believe they will continue this. I believe this will further exacerbate the breakdown of relationships of the male \ female pair bond. We will increasingly pay the price for this....we already are.

This new sociopolitical landscape is literally a contest and divide between the will of the family vs. the will of single women \ divorced women \feminist. Again, women being the majority vote and the most powerful voting demographic in the country I postulate that single \ divorced women will sway the vote away from the family vote. In time, as government husbandry \ chivalry as advocated by the feminists \ single woman vote grows, the numbers you see in the below photo will grow wider in disparity as a result.We will become an increasingly divided nation in regard to gender class between the interests of single women vs. single men but also in regard to family women vs. feminist women.

At this point, at the event horizon, the female feminist vote will hold sway over the course of the nation.

In fact, looking at the below numerical disparity and going by what we know by the data presented above, along with the current entrenchment of the feminist women's union within the political machine, the female feminist vote already has established marginal if not entire domination. Our future as a nation is now clenched in feminist hands.

To learn more about matriarchy please see Anatomy of Matriarchy to understand what women wish to build. Feel free to read the comment section of this current article as well to understand how women actually see men and the position fatherhood holds to them within the "family" and the lives of children. I'd like to thank the feminist for rearing her vile head here. Thank you for elucidating the goal of women and your feminist union for my countrymen. It is important that they know their enemy well. Men need to know our enemy better than the enemy knows themselves.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

"I want women to control their own health choices, just like I want my daughters to have the same opportunities as your sons" -Barrack Obama

Interesting notion Mr. President. Are you trying to say that if your daughter and a young man had an unplanned pregnancy that female right to abortion would afford the young men the same opportunity as her in such a case? What if she wanted to keep the child?

Actually sir, while sex and conception are by nature a mutual act requiring mutual responsibility, giving a female a choice in the matter without giving the young man a choice in the matter changes things. You see, sex and conception at that point becomes a mutual act requiring male responsibility. The sons of others of which you speak do not have the same choices or opportunities as your daughter. The young man is beholden to whatever your daughter chooses for him. Her choice over his liberty is sacrificed where as a woman's is not. In order for the nations sons to have the same opportunities wouldn't they need to have a choice as well?

As it is, lack of male Liberty is used to enable female choices. Sometimes, as females know this fact they trick a young man by telling him she is on birth control in order to use her choices on the sacrificial alter of male Liberty. Women have 100% the choice and men 100% the responsibility for that choice. Constitutional theory dictates that you can not have 100% choice or rights over something if you do not have 100% responsibility. Failing this it is called a privilege...not a right. What women have sir is a privilege....one that is enabled by male sacrifice of Liberty of right.

The phrase "my body my choice" is disingenuous. The phrase should be "my baby my choice" or "my property my choice". As it stands, without male right to abortion the mutual act of conception creates something that is by implication 100% female property without 100% female responsibility. So it is only rightful that it be 100% her responsibility. Her body, her choice, her baby, her responsibility. After all, the child from the moment of conception is her property right....right?

Unless of course you give young men a choice as well and in that case each would be able to make their own choice respectively in order to have equal opportunities. A young man can choose to abort the ramifications for the unplanned life created and a young woman can choose or not choose to do so as well. The equal opportunities of which you speak require equal choices. Isn't that what you said, you want the nations daughters to have the same opportunities as the nations sons.....correct? That will require male choice sir.

Here Mr. President. I understand you claim to be a scholar of our Constitution. I suggest you watch this 1st of a 43 part series on Constitutional theory as outlined by our founders to get you started. You will find the rest of the series on YouTube. You see, there is a difference between Rights and Privileges and the difference is directly related to Property and Responsibility. This is important for you to understand if you wish to know Freedom, Liberty and Independence beyond the hollow words that come from your mouth. You see Mr. President, in America, in more ways than one and in all facets of life women have "choices" and men....responsibilities.

I have my own views on the fiscal appropriation of funds to support abortion and also the guidelines in which the procedure should be allowed to be performed. In this respect I will go no further than to say it should be carefully regulated and furthermore limited as to who pays for it and how much if at all. It is a viable procedure in certain circumstances for women's health. In such case it should be covered under insurance. Unregulated free abortions through private institutions as well as federal subsidies to these institutions should not be allowed to be used for such purpose.

Away from it's viability for health reasons and in line with feminist doctrine of open support for unregulated pro abortion, being that this is the law under current feminist rule, being that instead the intended use is for cases of unplanned pregnancy rather than "a woman's health", being that the Constitution clearly dictates that equal rights must be afforded toward the same intended ends for which equal law must protect, equality can only be achieved in this order if men are given equal rights to abortion from the ramifications an unplanned pregnancy has upon our life choices, just as women can.

We must remember, pregnancy is not something a man does to a woman, it is a mutual act requiring mutual responsibility and contained within this, relative to feminist laws in effect and the implication of the purpose of these laws, there should be the mutual right to absolve ourselves from this responsibility.

We must remember that for women, given modern technology, conception and even pregnancy is 100% a voluntary and 100% preventable condition both pre and post conception. Responsibility for women's choices and by implication of current law, culpability and liability for what is currently 100% women's property and what is 100% her rights and decision over that property should not be 100% a man's responsibility. There is no reason why men should not be afforded choice and an equal right to forfeit the ramifications of the pending unintended ownership, unintended fatherhood...just as women can. See also the complimentary post to this article: Male Abortion Rights

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Great show.....Wow, the portion where the professor details his account of how women's Affirmative Action destroyed our Science and Engineering base is truly sad.

If you are not interested in listening to the whole show skip to the 92 MINUTE MARK. He gets into some real detail on what happened starting at the 97 minute mark. However, I recommend listening to the whole segment.

It's so so sad what women have done. After our colleges are paid large sums of money to make women's numbers equal to men's in these classes, the women drop the course and pursue the social sciences and other subjects of interest. Women do this in enormous numbers. And schools give them admission over men in hopes to meet the women's equality quota set by the government.

When a survey of women was conducted they said they used to Affirmative Action to get admission to the school (taking men's seats) then pursue another subject. The monetary incentive created for schools to give women admission over men is terrible. The school administration told the teacher not to talk about it. Women petition the government to offer the large sum of millions upon millions of dollars to any schools that do this to our science and engineering base in the effort to make women "equal". This is nation wide and implemented in part through Title IX women's equality compliance law. It's so sad what has happened. Obama has recently announced the plan to double down investment in "women's equality" in S.T.E.M. fields of science. I fear for the future of our nation. The future of my country does not look bright.

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Attention: TheGoodMenProject on many if not most occasions contains content by manginas and white knight supplicators. However they do have occasional content and readers who are more so pro male and Men's Rights MRAs.

I love some of the comments. Some men, myself included are trying to figure out why women seem to think there is a problem with women being the dominant sex and the breadwinners in society. It only makes sense from an economic standpoint that since women now outearn men, that men take on women's roles. Like women, men should be inherently valued as women are. Female doctors should marry male nurses and female managers their male secretaries. This is what women wanted. They can court us and pay for dates etc! President Obama just announced the other day that the new national focus will be on advancing women in Science and also offering more women only school loans!

"This is a victory for feminism. This is what the feminist movement has been pushing for for decades: Women having careers, making the money, having the power, and men feeling free to be the ones to stay at home. These gentleman are comfortable being at home and having someone else make the money."

"These gents simply want to be homemakers. They love being at home. They would make fine househusbands and stay at home dads to women who want a career but don’t want to have to come home to do it all. This works. The women can make the money and these fine gentleman can drive the cars their wives buy for them, do the shopping, and try out new recipes. And take an afternoon nap so that he’s fresh for when she comes home in the evening.

Women have become stronger and more dominant and independent. Men have become weaker and more dependent. This is what the movement has been and continues to work for."

"If, theoretically, women are flourishing like never before because of feminism (i.e. because of the way that feminists have gotten rid of the strict life script and traditional gender roles of the past), then wouldn’t it make more sense for men to do them same thing in order to flourish?”

That is exactly what is happening. Feminism has flipped the script. As women are more driven in their careers, many men are less so. Feminist influence has socialized them to no longer feel a need to be able to support a family, to be the protector/provider/leader / martyr."

"They are now taught to be content to have the woman bring home the money and take care of him, while he is happy to stay at home and be a home-maker and/or raise the children, letting her handle the pressure of overtime, commuting, travel, stress, etc. to earn a living for the family. There are more secularly unmotivated men than ever before. This is the model that feminism has long been promoting. This is a victory for them. They should be celebrating it."

My sentiments exactly....women worked so hard for this. It now makes more sense for men to be homemakers! This is wonderful news for men. Women will gladly allow us into the role of the "oppressed"! I'm sure of it!

Men and Women Men's Rights Activists discuss male options: Men Going Their Own Way:

I believe it important that if men expect to remain members of the matriarchal family they be willing to be a live-in cuckold within a harem as part of a polyandrous \ polyamorous relationship structure. One can remain a beta male within the family but the matriarch will need to mate with high status males that may not commit to her but her willing cuckold at home is obliged to assist in the raising of this males offspring....that is if marriage takes place at all. When men are discarded from the family by divorce in the future we must work out who will gain parental custody of any biological and in the case of the male, any non biological children. We must also examine the role alimony and child support will play in our growing societal construct of matriarchy.

-To learn more about what matriarchy means for fatherhood and the concept of marriage please see Anatomy of Matriarchy

In the video at the bottom of this post, Liza Mundy discusses the new role of the beta bitch husband within the matriarchal household at New America Foundation. One of the panelists discusses the growing male aversion to marrying under matriarchy and what this means in relation to collapsing birth rates associated with matriarchy. He mentions a behavior among men which is taking place in Japan which is interesting to note as there is also a rising phenomenon of men withdrawing from females and becoming "grasseaters" or "soushoku danshi" which translates to grass-eating boys. This is similar to the American phenomenon known as MGTOW or Men Going Their Own Way. MGTOW is also associated with and related to what is also known as "zeta masculinity."

While both Japanese "soushoku danshi" and MGTOW exhibit similar behavior, MGTOW and Zeta Masculinity takes a decidedly masculine self empowering approach. MGTOW and Zeta Masculinity is somewhat connected to the subculture of PUA or "pickup artist" and the resulting employment of Game or Game Theory. This is a type of behavioral adaptation of males that employs elements of an evolutionary biological approach to gain attraction and temporary mating opportunity with females. It is a type of faining and emulation of alpha male characteristics. However, it must be noted that MGTOW (MGTOW article 2) is popular across all levels of socio-economic class as it is not only the growing underclass of beta men who adhere to the lifestyle but the most desirable and resourcefully successful of males as well. I suspect that although males at the upper end of the spectrum have their pick of females, they adhere to MGTOW due to feminist matriarchal Marriage 2.0 laws and furthermore enjoy regular sex and access to females without commitment to such a one sided obligation. These males may also have already been married and divorced. With their resources now being transferred by force to the matriarchal family these males resolve themselves to withdraw into MGTOW and are unwilling to or simply unable to start another family.

MGTOW, Zeta Masculinity and the somewhat loosely associated behavior of PUA \ Game are lifestyles characterized by male self actualization for the male's benefit alone outside and away from the traditional norm of male identity associated with commitment to females and the establishments of dating, marriage, fatherhood and family.

Within American culture, Game originates from the learned behavioral adaptations of males within the matriarchal culture that is the African American community. It is now being adopted by other American males across lines of race and class as our matriarchal societal construct continues to grow. However, many choose not to associate with females at all including the absconding and rejection of the notion of pursuing females for sex. This element is known as "ghosting" or the action of "going ghost." Those adhering to "ghosting" may have already been married and divorced. With their resources now being transferred by force to the matriarchal family and the matriarch's children, these males resolve themselves not to be interested in associating with females at all.

All of the above growing subcultures are marked by a decided wide scale male desire to withdraw from connection and contribution to society to any productive fashion beyond the interests of the self. Many are quite happy to step off the fast track of pursuing high levels of resources in a career and into a much more relaxing, slower paced and lower paid career life. Without incentive to produce within a competitive echelon for access to females, many men are happy and content with expending very little effort beyond what makes them personally happy. Men in general are not rampant consumers and when they do make a purchase it is usually for an object of functional and practical use along with the occasional recreational item. By withdrawing from the system many men are content with very little. They are quite content with beer, sports, video games, porn and grilling food together with fellow ostracized males who have dropped out. Under the construct of matriarchy men are quite content to be loutish and unproductive.

In Japan a Media Shakers, a consulting company that is a subsidiary of Dentsu, the country's largest advertising agency, estimates that 60 percent of men in their early 20s and at least 42 percent of men aged 23 to 34 consider themselves grass-eating men. Partner Agent, a Japanese dating agency, found in a survey that 61 percent of unmarried men in their 30s identified themselves as herbivores. Of the 1,000 single men in their 20s and 30s polled by Lifenet, a Japanese life-insurance company, 75 percent described themselves as grass-eating men.

I personally estimate that approximately 80% of the American male population increasingly adheres to one or more elements of these male withdraw phenomenons. Again, the phenomenons are all tied together by the increasing male desire to withdraw and much of any interest in women involves little more than the momentary pursuit of women for sex while others do not seek to associate with women at all. How men seek to define their lives under this construct is an interesting notion to attempt to understand. To learn more about Game \ PUA as it relates to male withdraw and marginalization please see: Game \ PUA Now A Necessity.

Friday, April 27, 2012

VAWA debate rages on. For the first time men are being considered as an equal class of American citizen.

Debate continues in Washington as to whether every class of human being including illegal immigrants should be given protection under law to the exclusion of one class of American, the heterosexual male. So far VAWA covers gay males, lesbians, American Indian women, illegal immigrants and all women. There are Constitutionalists in government fighting for heterosexual males to be given protection under law. There are no specifications by race or religious class of American just yet. I don't expect there will be. The debate is over whether the heterosexual male class of American should have the same representation as everyone else including non Americans. We will wait and see if the heterosexual male is given equal protection and representation under law.

For the first time the question of whether men should be considered equal Americans deserving equal protection under the law comes up for debate. The Women's Union along with the associated Democratic party are doing everything they can to prevent heterosexual males from having the right to be covered under the equal protection clause of our Constitution. For the record I do not pick sides in our two party system, I consider myself a sovereign citizen if anything and do not respect either party, our government establishment nor where they are leading the nation. That said:

This is going on when a friend of mine just informed me that the abuse he suffered at the hands of his former girlfriend had come to bear upon his health....My friend has a history of abuse by females. His mother was also violent and abusive. But.....there is no help for men. How long.....how long until men are viewed as human beings?

"Just a heads up about my incident though, I didn't wanna say anything on my wall due to mutual friends, but my ex Nicole, she's the reason I have the issue. She used to physically kick me down there all the time if I was late coming home. After I left her, she had police come to my door and accused me of beating her, even though she had no marks on her. "Hydrocele, it's basically an absess on my left testicle. It was also coupled with a non cancerous tumor that was removed as well. Nasty scar, but I'm still able to have kids. I had an awesome surgeon Dr. Ogbolu. Great guy. I'm just peachy, though walking is a bit of a task."

How long....how long will it be until men like my friend above will be able to call the police and not be scared of being taken to jail for doing so? How long.....until men have equal protection under law under VAWA?! See: Violence Against Men Is Normal

The goal of this law is the implementation of what can be called government husbandry.

Being that the goal of female "independence" is in fact to make women independent by way of male subjugation under marriage 2.0 laws, government husbandry support etc. it is imperative that as we move toward a matriarchal society that women be communally supported rather than exploiting the bodies of men and extracting the fruits of our labor from it. Marriage as an institution is no longer legitimate given the laws women have changed. In order to make women independent they must become independent from their dependency on the exploitation, lack of rights and resulting disposability of men. This will in turn make men independent. True feminist independence and equality is the advent of mutual independence not just female independence. Mutual independence is another term for mutual dis-need. Mutual dis-need should be the goal if men are going to complete the structure of the Matriarchal Society for which women want built. See: Anatomy of Matriarchy

March 8th. The Soviet Union: International Women's Day Was Created:

Under Matriarchy, under the true paradigm of actual female independence from men, it is the role of the State to support women and for women to support themselves. Men are not a part of the family and as it is, not a part of the lives of our children. It is only when actual female independence is implemented will men be free from the false female independence brought about by the legalization of the disposability, lack of rights and exploitation of men under matriarchal feminist marriage 2.0 laws. Female nature is communal. Communalism \ Communism, Feminism and Matriarchy go hand in hand. It is the goal of women to create a communal communist feminist matriarchal society. Feminism's primary goal is to direct more resources to women by any means necessary to foster "liberation" "independence" or what is falsely called "equality".

In order for men to attempt to make proper choices for themselves in terms of living a healthy life under the scourge of Feminism it is important for men to understand what women's intentions are as we move forward. Male liberation is what the vile ideologies of Communism \ Feminism promises men. The current implementation of male subjugation is an intermediary step. This is also what women mean when they say Patriarchy harms men to. They purport that when Feminism reaches it's goals it will liberate men as well. In the meantime men must make decisions that will best protect themselves as Feminism charges ahead with it's goals. Men must understand that feminism is not something separate from the modus operandi of female nature. Feminism is the name given to the collective vehicle of inherent female nature and associated agency given to them to enact it.

It is important for us as a culture to understand that women are the source and cause of the destruction of family and the advent of fatherless children. Once we understand this on a societal level we will be able to address it as a culture. However, I do not expect women to make a concession to this. I think the MRM has done a great job of placing the culpability where it needs to be while also serving to protect men from making the mistake of forming a feminist family and feminist marriage with a woman. All marriage as defined by law is feminist marriage. Men in the MRM have done a fantastic job of helping younger men understand the position we face. To learn more about the historical roots and ideology of Feminism please see: Feminism and The Communist Revolution

Subscribe To REBUKING FEMINISM

About Me

Premise Claimer

To create a greater understanding of men and women and our struggle in todays society in the United States. Please feel free to contribute and offer your own writings and information in the comments section and at REBUKEFEM@YAHOO.COM.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or the people"

- 10th Amendment United States Constitution

Feminism stands on the principal of equality or classlessness. These principals are the hallmark of Marxist socialist theory. Essentially equal outcome by unequal means and unequal protection under law to reach these ends.

Males being a minority both in numbers and a minority of the voting majority has lead to class conflict, oppression and division based off "gender" of this minority class.

"Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, (the female voting and numerical majority) that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority (males) possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression" - President Thomas Jefferson.

Affirmative Action, Title IX, VAWA, Divorce, Family and Child Custody Law to name a few.

Make no mistake, women are not your natural enemy. However, they are the body politic of feminism and the female political agency responsible for it. All women are responsible for feminism and the actions of their union. They have created class division between men and women toward the ends of dividing us both. The division of male and female as separate classes with unequal representation under law and policy has been the principal means to usurp and rule our people. Feminism has destroyed the common felicity between men and women. Feminism removed ALL male rights in marriage and thus divorce while absolving women of all liability of commitment. Feminism has removed the right to fatherhood. Men have no place in the family and should not commit to the institution of it. We must both fight the tyranny of feminism.