It is uncontroversial that the intent is to allow comments and white-space wherever SQL-92 allows them. The ADQL standard however says differently, and there should be a clarification. Between two alternatives, adding a clarifying subsection to the ADQL-2.0 standard or removing the separator.

Erratum Content

In section 2 of the ADQL 2.0 Recommendation, add a section 2.1.4 with the following content:

1.1.4 Whitespace and Comments
The rules on where whitespace is allowed and required are as in SQL92;
essentially, any <token> may be followed by a <separator>.

Impact Assessment

The change introduced by this erratum has no other impact on the current ADQL grammar and language apart from what already described in the previous sections of this note. Current implementations and parsers of ADQL query strings shouldn't be affected at all by this change. Moreover, current BNF grammar in ADQL-2.0 needs changes to be machine readable and validated and one of the issues in BNF is exactly how to deal with optional or required white spaces.