Posted - 2012.07.19 07:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pretty sure you should actually be a member of the militia you're fighting for. Its bad enough that you see more minmatar than gallente in the gallente-caldari FW. It's pretty immersion breaking

Pretty sure you should actually be a member of the militia you're fighting for. Its bad enough that you see more minmatar than gallente in the gallente-caldari FW. It's pretty immersion breaking

They are both an enemy non the less and it is in the lore. It is funny to me how many amarr corps switched to caldari because they refuse to still fight for amarr and that you have the nerve to say that. I realize you are scared, but yeah.

Posted - 2012.07.19 14:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Only way this would be possible is to make all FW sides at war with each other. Otherwise, as an example, what would happen if some Gallente pilots flipped an amarr system and minmatar suddenly decided they wanted the system? There is no way for minmatar to go after that system then without helping the amarr or caldari to take it first.

What'd be way more interesting is for CCP to hire some GMs specifically for the purpose of roleplaying leaders in each of the factional empires, the alliances shifting or changing based on that. Introduce pirate factions to the FW system, allowing them to work at taking each others space, or perhaps invade lowsec and try to take over space from any militia they can.

Posted - 2012.07.19 14:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Combining two threads... maybe friendly militias could assist drones to each other to kill I-HUB. That way some of the more prominent members of the Mewmatar Militia could have the opportunity to participate in exciting bunker busting fleets.

Posted - 2012.07.19 15:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
I definitely agree with the OP - both militias are at war with the militia in question, both should be able to shoot the bunker.

Having said that, as X G alluded to I LOVE not being able to shoot bunkers. It's a great way to say "sorry guys, I would LOVE to help you shoot that stationary structure really I would but CCP just won't let me sorry" :)

Posted - 2012.07.19 16:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Have no damn idea from what militia OP is (and dont care to be honest), but that would be funny:1) His allied militia looses all sov. 2) His militia get all sov in his front.3) His militia goes to other front and get all systems for OP's militia.4) ... You think now is part for proifit? FAK NO! it will be later;5) OP gets so huge medal that it even bigger than his ego for capture of all FW systems in new eden;6) his militia LP store gets ... mmm... 2 * 75% ... 150% discount on shop prices (that is LP shop gives You back all LP You spent plus half of LP You spent)7) OP buys gazzilion of navy ships;8) PROFIT! (yes now it is)9) evenews24 writes new article about new goon exploit

eddie valvetino wrote:

Abannan wrote:

No

posting in other thread i don't understand or care about.

OP made a mistake, it should request make iHUBs attackable by anybody (and so anybody like... SnuffBox could get lowsec sov). I can bet that You started to care imeddiatlly

eddie valvetino wrote:

Abannan wrote:

No

p.s. can someone come and do something about Suj? that red flashy bar is driving me nuts..

Have no damn idea from what militia OP is (and dont care to be honest), but that would be funny:1) His allied militia looses all sov. 2) His militia get all sov in his front.3) His militia goes to other front and get all systems for OP's militia.4) ... You think now is part for proifit? FAK NO! it will be later;5) OP gets so huge medal that it even bigger than his ego for capture of all FW systems in new eden;6) his militia LP store gets ... mmm... 2 * 75% ... 150% discount on shop prices (that is LP shop gives You back all LP You spent plus half of LP You spent)7) OP buys gazzilion of navy ships;8) PROFIT! (yes now it is)9) evenews24 writes new article about new goon exploit

eddie valvetino wrote:

Abannan wrote:

No

posting in other thread i don't understand or care about.

OP made a mistake, it should request make iHUBs attackable by anybody (and so anybody like... SnuffBox could get lowsec sov). I can bet that You started to care imeddiatlly

eddie valvetino wrote:

Abannan wrote:

No

p.s. can someone come and do something about Suj? that red flashy bar is driving me nuts..

and wadafak do You want? Turn it into green flashy bar?

Pink with a pony pattern please...

lets be fair, low sov doesn't effect us, nor would there be any real benefit in it too corps like snuffbox as we don't get LP.

If we did get something from it, we would have shot it.. even if it made the I-hub post whiney "please change game mechanic" posts.

also, now it's red... can you see anyone, putting on a fleet and coming to Suj to flip the system?

How is it immersion breaking? Everyone shows up as orange, and the Minmatar Republic has a mutual war with the Caldari state as stated right at the top of the factional warfare screen.

So you could have your cake and eat it too by benefitting from matar tier while pumping up gallente. What else you want, button to cause caldari npcs to shoot at caldari militia. Oh right, you already do that.

But whine harder, maybe CCP Soundwave gives you another...well, lets not get this character banned for saying uncomfortable truths.

How is it immersion breaking? Everyone shows up as orange, and the Minmatar Republic has a mutual war with the Caldari state as stated right at the top of the factional warfare screen.

So you could have your cake and eat it too by benefitting from matar tier while pumping up gallente. What else you want, button to cause caldari npcs to shoot at caldari militia. Oh right, you already do that.

But whine harder, maybe CCP Soundwave gives you another...well, lets not get this character banned for saying uncomfortable truths.

Wow, it works both ways. All you need to do is contribute instead of whine. You might do better if you attacked more in space than in here.

Posted - 2012.07.19 20:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
The way is going now we have the losing sides joining their winning ally. i.e. Gallente militia corps joining Minmatar and Amarr corps joining Caldari. If this is implemented, may as well just only have 2 sides since the loser will simply jump over to the other lowsec.Maybe having 2 sides is a good thing but these lowsec regions are not close to each other. Therefore the losing sides will end up with fewer pilots.

The way is going now we have the losing sides joining their winning ally. i.e. Gallente militia corps joining Minmatar and Amarr corps joining Caldari. If this is implemented, may as well just only have 2 sides since the loser will simply jump over to the other lowsec.Maybe having 2 sides is a good thing but these lowsec regions are not close to each other. Therefore the losing sides will end up with fewer pilots.

What I am proposing would actually let people stay in the same Militia and just assist an ally and reap the same benefits depending on where they do it. Instead of Amarr corps bailing to Caldari and Gals going to Minmatar. My apologies if I have not made that part clear.

I definitely agree with the OP - both militias are at war with the militia in question, both should be able to shoot the bunker.

Having said that, as X G alluded to I LOVE not being able to shoot bunkers. It's a great way to say "sorry guys, I would LOVE to help you shoot that stationary structure really I would but CCP just won't let me sorry" :)

How many Amarr bunkers have you helped capture for Minmatar Militia since your corp switched to Minmatar? You guys are only in it to leech Minmatar's LP dumps, no reason you should have any effect on Gal war zone control when you have zero effect on Minmatar war zone control.

How many Amarr bunkers have you helped capture for Minmatar Militia since your corp switched to Minmatar? You guys are only in it to leech Minmatar's LP dumps, no reason you should have any effect on Gal war zone control when you have zero effect on Minmatar war zone control.

They are affecting Caldari Warzone control (and they are at war with the Caldari too, it says so in the FW tab). I bet if they wouldn't get any LP if the Caldari were to surrender to the Minmatar.

How many Amarr bunkers have you helped capture for Minmatar Militia since your corp switched to Minmatar? You guys are only in it to leech Minmatar's LP dumps, no reason you should have any effect on Gal war zone control when you have zero effect on Minmatar war zone control.

They are affecting Caldari Warzone control (and they are at war with the Caldari too, it says so in the FW tab). I bet they wouldn't get any LP if the Caldari were to surrender to the Minmatar.

I'm glad you are confirming that the age old argument of there being only 2 Militias, I suppose this saves us from need to have another one of those topics. .. The only two Militias being of course Caldari & Minmatar.

I'm glad you are confirming that the age old argument of there being only 2 Militias, I suppose this saves us from need to have another one of those topics. .. The only two Militias being of course Caldari & Minmatar.

No, I was saying if Caldair don't want Minmatar plexers in their space, they could pull an "Italy" make a separate peace deal. Just sayin'. But I don't think Tibus Heath is up to the task, tbh....

Posted - 2012.07.22 17:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
I just want Gallente militia to show up as a purple star instead of neutral, and then you have to screen threw your overview to see who's militia and who isn't.

COPYRIGHT NOTICEEVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.