Critical Systems Heuristics

Abstract

Critical systems heuristics (CSH) is a framework for reflective professional practice organised around the central tool of boundary critique. This paper, written jointly by the original developer, Werner Ulrich, and Martin Reynolds, an experienced practitioner of CSH, offers a systematic introduction to the idea and use of boundary critique. Its core concepts are explained in detail and their use is illustrated by means of two case studies from the domain of environmental planning and management. A particular focus is on working constructively with tensions between opposing perspectives as they arise in many situations of professional intervention. These include tensions such as ‘situation’ versus ‘system’, ‘is’ versus ‘ought’ judgements, concerns of ‘those involved’ versus ‘those affected but not involved’, stakeholders’ ‘stakes’ versus ‘stakeholding issues’, and others. Accordingly, boundary critique is presented as a participatory process of unfolding and questioning boundary judgements rather than as an expert-driven process of boundary setting. The paper concludes with a discussion of some essential skills and considerations regarding the practice of boundary critique.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Parts of the account of the NRUA-Botswana study in Section 6.2 of the present paper are reproduced from an earlier publication by one of the authors (Reynolds 2007); we are grateful to the publishers of Edge Press, Point Reyes, CA, for granting us permission to reproduce this material. We do not need the systems concept at all if we are not interested in handling systems boundaries critically.

Berardi, A., Bernard, C., Buckingham-Shum, S., Ganapathy, S., Mistry, J., Reynolds, M., Ulrich, W. (2006). The ECOSENSUS project: co-evolving tools, practices and open content for participatory natural resource management. 2nd International Conference on e-Social Science, 28-30 June, Manchester, UK. Presentation and full paper available in the website of the National Centre for e-Social Science (NCeSS) of the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC), http://www.ncess.ac.uk/research/sgp/ecocensus. Also available in the Open University’s Open Research Online site, http://oro.open.ac.uk/2692/.

Carr, S. & Oreszczyn, S. (2003). Critical systems heuristics: a tool for the inclusion of ethics and values in complex policy decisions. In Ethics as a Dimension of Agrifood Policy, Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Toulouse, France, 20-22 March 2003. Paper available in the website of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (EurSafe), http://technology.open.ac.uk/cts/EURSAFE4-CSH-paper.pdf.

Korzybski, A. (1933). A Non-Aristotelian System and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics. In A. Korzybski, Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, Lakeville, CT: International Non-Aristotelian Library, pp. 747-761.Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. (2008b). Reframing expert support for development management. Journal of International Development20(6), 768-782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, M., Berardi, A., Bernard, C., Bachler, M., Buckingham-Shum, S., Mistry, J., Ulrich, W. (2007). ECOSENSUS: developing collaborative learning systems for stakeholding development in environmental planning. Curriculum, Teaching & Student Support Conference, The Open University, Milton Keynes, 1-2 May 2007. Paper available in the Open University’s Open Research Online site, http://oro.open.ac.uk/8580/. Also available through the site of the Knowledge Media Institute, http://oro.open.ac.uk/view/faculty_dept/kmi.html.