Israeli Central Banker DQ’d from IMF Job

We wanted Israeli central banker Stanley Fischer to be the next head of the International Monetary Fund—previously helmed by the disgraced Dominique Strauss-Kahn—before it was cool. We’ve watched giddily as Fischer, who in the ’90s served seven years as the IMF’s number two and has performed spectacularly shepherding Israel’s economy through dire economic straits, became the favored candidate of the financial intelligentsia and as his narrow, unlikely, yet weirdly plausible path to election became clear. When he formally announced his bid last week, we were all in. One endorsement was particularly striking: Fischer is a “superb human being,” one former IMF official said, adding, “He is supremely qualified for the job. Indeed, it’s difficult to see how one can be more qualified.” The former official is Palestinian Authority prime minister Salam Fayyad.

Technically, it’s correct. IMF rules stipulate that first-time, elected IMF chiefs be 65 or under; Fischer is 67. It had been widely assumed, however, that this rule would be waived if it became clear that Fischer would be the pick. The Wall Street Journal and other outlets mentioned this caveat only in passing. As Fischer himself argued, “It’s not sensible at this stage to say to someone at 67, who is full of vigor, that he’s too old.” He also said that the IMF board could vote to allow him in. That this clearly outdated rule should fell Fischer’s candidacy is borderline fishy. If anything, it was perceived to be the least of his obstacles.

He was always the unlikely next IMF head. French finance minister Christine Lagarde has secured the backing of Europe and its 35 percent of the votes. For Fischer to sneak in, Lagarde would have to be rejected by the emerging world—upset that there have been zero non-First World heads in the IMF’s 65-year history—and alternate candidate Agustín Carstens, Mexico’s top central banker, would have to fail to generate enthusiasm, thereby allowing Fischer, who though a joint U.S.-Israeli citizen was technically born in what is now Namibia, to cast himself as African and emerge as the dark-horse winner. This gambit was dealt a blow late last week when Lagarde got the support of several African nations.

On the other hand, all Fischer really needed to do was persuade elites in the United States, which holds 17 percent of the votes and is the fund’s top funder, to back him. And this task would have proved less of a chore, given that such elites as Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner have worked closely with him in the past and that other elites such as Ben Bernanke and N. Gregory Mankiw were his thesis advisees at M.I.T.

In a Wall Street Journalinterview, Fischer burnished his credentials, arguing that tough times call for an actual economist to head the IMF (which Lagarde is not, though Carstens is).

There is an argument that Fischer’s ascension would be Bad for the Jews: He has been so good for Israel’s economy, and therefore losing him would, as Prime Minister Netanyahu put it, “create a problem for us.” (Bibi gave Fischer his blessing, however.) And it is not like he would be the first Jew to have the honor (um, DSK?).

But the spectacle of a brilliant, hyper-competent Israeli heading one of the leading institutions for the transfer of wealth from the First to Third World would be a great image (and it doesn’t hurt that Fischer is a longtime peacenik when it comes to the Palestinians). If there were evidence that Fischer had lost a step due to age, then of course he would not be a proper fit to head the IMF. However, as the Journal reports, he has spent the past several years as the world’s best central banker: “Fischer’s interest-rate policy is credited with helping to steer Israel’s economy nearly unscathed through the financial crisis of 2008 and overseeing strong growth,” it reported, “at a time when the U.S. and Europe are struggling.” Discounting political considerations (which is perhaps a hopelessly naïve exercise), he is clearly the best person for the job.

WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters@tabletmag.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

it is a shame since he is so talented…but rules are rules and an organization like the IMF can’t just change the rules so quickly..it would take years….either way sorry for him, but happy for Israel..

Name (required)Email (required, will not be published)Website (optional)

Message

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.