ve wanted to increase CR sa to 86/87 because he's scoring such a incredible amount of goals it's hard to replicate it with current set, at least I've problems(especially when computer plays as Real Madrid).And TBH it's funny jurgens that now you comparise players since you said

Our goal is making players realistic and individual as much as it's possible and current tendency is to not be so strict with the ladders which I totally agree with.

Players strong points are what should make them realistic. Ronaldo needs higher SA than he had on PSD, but an 87 is far too high. That takes away from the individulaism of both he and robben. As there near comparable with those ratings, when there is a world of differnce. Robben doesn't have the same goal/game ration ronaldo has, but it's not far off. If he played 50+ matches, he'd be on 40+. He has 20% more shot's on target than ronaldo every year too. There should be a huge differmce between the.

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude

I don't see why he shouldn't have it. It's not like I just randomly assigned this card. Last year, many times he was crossing way before he got to the box, looking to pick out gomez, rather than charging ahead on, he was slowing down and picking out a cross deep from the side midfield. Hes not going to be using it 24/7 in game with that TW and those dribbling stats, but he'll use it on odd occasion like he should. But it was more than the odd occasion last year, he did it so much that it really stood out to me how good a crosser he actually is, a much over looked aspect of his game.

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.

LeMisérable wrote:im not mad, why should I be mad just because of you, your nothing, 1 in 7 billion, i mean dude

This set started with 92 TS and 93 ACC, but Robben was out of form so he had a deserved decrease in both of them. Now like two months before we can say without doubts that Robben is back!! (Glod bless that! :´]). I mentioned that two stats because, maybe is just me but i wanted to share it with you that imo he recovers his TS but not his ACC, is like after every two serious injuries he loses 1 point in ACC but when he recovers his form his TS is the same, but it cost more to him to reach it.

isn't 92 attack a bit too high for a guy who only knows 1 method to play? Almost all good defs know what he gonna do. dribble to the centre and shoot became not that dangedous and unpredictable as it was year or two ago. i don't see a reason for him to sit on orange in attack in any of it's definitions (loose the marker at right time - no, dangerousity - yes, but not that high, suitability to the posisition or whatever - again not that high)

Anyone against COND: 5? He is being very irregular on his performances during this and all seasons on his career to deserve actual condition. He is a WC player without a doubt but he is very irregular on his form, he will never be the number one just because of that. Consistency.