Friday, February 04, 2011

Friday's GamesWho's the best team in the Ivy? The winner of Harvard at Princeton will give us an early leader in the clubhouse.

Saturday's GamesNebraska knocked off A&M at home last weekend...can the Huskers do the same to Kansas this weekend?

Can Texas take care of Texas Tech at home to lock down a spot on the 1 line?

Is Florida the best team in the SEC? If the Gators beat Kentucky in Gainesville on Saturday, they might be seeded that way on Monday.

Who deserves the best seed from the Pac-10? After Washington's slip-up against Oregon State, it might be Arizona (if the Wildcats can take care of Cal).

Could Washington State have played any worse against Oregon? Are the Cougars worthy of a bid even if they win at Oregon State?

Can the Flying Jimmers complete a season sweep of UNLV?

Can Pitt take care of Cincinnati at home? Isn't it about time the Bearcats picked up a second quality win in conference?

Will Villanova complete a nice 2-0 week with a home win over West Virginia?

Can Missouri and A&M bounce back from losses earlier in the week and beat Baylor and Colorado, respectively, at home?

Will a win at Iowa State be enough to get Kansas State back in the bracket?

Has Syracuse righted the ship? If so, they should no problem at South Florida.

Can Vandy avoid falling to 3-5 in conference and beat South Carolina?

Will Illinois survive a tricky road game at Northwestern?

Does VCU still deserve the Colonial automatic? If George Mason beats ODU at home, the Rams might get bumped.

Can Duquesne improve to 9-0 in the A-10 (9-0!) with a road win over the Bonnies?

Can Xavier and Temple stay within striking distance of the Dukes by beating Saint Louis and Rhode Island at home?

How bad is Conference USA right now? Is Memphis still the team to beat?

Speaking of the Tigers, can they burst Gonzaga's bubble with a win in Spokane?

Does Butler have any chance of winning at Cleveland State after the way they played at Youngstown State?

Seriously, Youngstown State?

Who deserves the Missouri Valley automatic right now? Missouri State (after their head-scratching loss at Evansville)? Northern Iowa (who's won eight in a row)? Or Wichita State (who is a game up in conference but already has home losses to the other two?)

Does the Valley deserve two bids on Monday?

Who needs the win more - St. John's or UCLA? Who gets it?

Can BC save its spot in the bracket and beat Virginia Tech at home?

Can Tennessee avoid losing a trap game at home against Alabama? The Vols play at Kentucky and at Florida next week.

Sunday's GamesCan Minnesota knock off Ohio State? The Gophers will have play a tiny bit better than they did against Indiana on Wednesday.

Doesn't Michigan State just seem destined for the NIT at this point? Do the Spartans still deserve a bid on Monday (with 10 losses) if they don't upset Wisconsin at the Kohl Center?

Is Penn State a one-week wonder? Can the Nittany Lions beat Michigan at home to stay in the bracket?

How will Larry Drew's departure affect North Carolina? Can the Tar Heels beat Florida State at home and keep pace with Duke in conference?

I was interested to see if you would incoporate Drew's leaving into your analysis of the UNC/FSU game. It is an interesting loss at an odd time. Interesting in that FSU has not been that great from the perimeter (especially on the road) and Drew is arguably thier best perimeter defender.

Anon, leader in the clubhouse does not necessarily refer to a end situation. The golf term is used to define who has the lead with holes still left to play. Also it can be used at any point in the tournament, not just the final round, so it is an apt description.

But only after the conclusion of a round... There's really no college basketball equivalent, since one team normally doesn't finish earlier than another, at least not early enough to "post" a record or score to be aimed at by the leaders left on the course. It's cool, though, because I read the site for their bracket knowledge, not their mastery of the english language.

It will be interesting to see how UNC responds without Drew. Not only is he a solid perimeter defender, but the way he left also had to be a jolt to the team. We still like the Heels at home, but not as much as we liked them yesterday.

How important are top 50 wins going to be for ACC teams? I can see ACC bubble teams with 2 or 3 top 50 wins, but another 4 50-75 wins. How much weight do you think the committee will give a win over RPI 48 versus RPI 56 (as an example)?

What about Indiana they must be on the bubble there worst loss is to by 17 not on netural court and they have 3 huge wins over Illinois,minneosta,michagen. The rest of the losses are close to teams that are in your touranment expect colorado so good resume

You bring up a good point about the ACC. The league has five teams right now ranked in the 55-80 range in the RPI and only three in the Top 50 (Duke, UNC, and BC).

Each committee weighs things differently, but they all look at Top 50 wins as well as Top 100 wins when selecting and seeding the bracket. The ACC bubble teams will have to hope that this committee favors quantity over quality.

Whats wrong with Indiana you cant say no chance they beat minneosta and Illinois lost to kentucky by 10 and was up by 6 with 6 minutes to go and you said most commites look at top 50 wins they have 2 more then michagen or northwesturn

So, why is UCLA one of your last four teams in, along with Alabama (!)? It's hard to have credibility as a bracketology (or Nitology) expert when one cannot spell resume or the Northern in Northern Iowa (who seem way too far down the list in the NIT, as they are a bubble team for the NCAAs).

I think one of the better games of the weekend will be the George Mason-Old Dominion battle in the CAA. I can understand GMU not getting a ton of love because they lack a signature win. The blowout of Hofstra was a start, but beating ODU would be key. And speaking of ODU, they have underachieved a little in conference play so far. How about that bad loss VCU suffered this week??

I will be attending the GMU-ODU game...I'm very excited in what should be a very exciting basketball weekend.

Bama still isn't worthy of an at-large people. Dont have accurate RPI numbers but it was over 100 before the day started. Only 2 signature wins vs Kentucky and at Tenn. Their OOC performance was not even deserving of an NIT consideration. Yes they've played well recently, but their gonna have to keep beating top SEC East teams to have a shot at at-large.

No one's necessarily saying Alabama is worthy of an at-large right now, but they seem to be playing themselves into consideration (winning 5 in a row and 10 out of 11) at a time when bubble teams are finding ways to lose. They still have three crucial games against the East (@ Vanderbilt/@ Florida/Georgia) that will have a big say in whether or not they can get an at-large. They probably have to win at least two out of those three.

Anonymous is right about Alabama. The Tide picked up a very nice road win tonight, but they have a ways to go to get an at-large. They still have more bad losses than they have Top 100 wins, and their RPI is still hovering around triple digits.

If they can win at least two of the three big games they have left (at Vandy, at Florida, vs. Georgia), then they'll be in the mix.

If they lose at Florida and Vandy and win the rest of them and go 13-3 in conference, I still think they wont be in. Such a bad OOC it's really hard to overcome in a conference that is really not any better than MWC or A-10.

"If you don't think this team is one of the top 65 teams in the country, you're certifiably insane," Alabama coach Anthony Grant said after the win at Tennessee. "Because I don't know who else could come into this environment, basically play a road game, whoever else is on the bubble, and play those guys the way we just played them."

Unfortunately, Alabama must get to 13-3 to have a legitimate at-large beef. 2 wins versus the top 100 and 4 losses to teams outside the top 100. That's not even a bubble team.

Marquette deserves to be in, but they don't deserve a single-digit seed.

Washington will drop to the 8/9 range after their awful week.

Bowling Green was a half game up in the MAC East standings on Friday, so that's why Lunardi gave them the auto bid. (Remember, he just gives the first place team in each conference the auto bid and uses RPI to break ties; he doesn't pick who he thinks the best team is). Kent State deserves the MAC auto bid, and they'll keep it in our bracket tomorrow.

We like George Mason a lot too, and it's going to be a tough call this week between Mason and VCU for the Colonial auto bid.

The Patriots have one fewer loss than VCU, a 30 point RPI edge, an 80 point SOS edge, and two more Top 100 wins. What they don't have (which VCU does) is a quality OOC win. VCU also has an easier conference schedule left considering they get ODU and Mason at home.

Mike I love your name but there's no way Penn St is winning in Wisconsin never mind beating them twice in one season. I'm a huge Ohio State fan and I'm excepting a loss on Saturday. Wisconsin undefeated at the Kohl center and the Buckeyes undefeated everywhere something has to give.

George Mason has no good wins away from the Patriot Center outside of Harvard. VCU has wins AT ODU and vs. UCLA on a neutral court. I'm not sure how that justifies Mason being a line better than VCU in the seeding.

Anon, chief inside clubhouse does not actuallyBuy rs gold reference the stop situation. This golf term is utilized to establish who may have charge using slots eventually left to play. And it can be utilized at virtually any reason the particular match, besides the ultimate spherical, so it's Cheap wow golda suitable account.

Bracketology 101 has been featured in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Wall Street Journal and on ESPN Radio affiliates across the country. The site is designed to serve as a more reliable, more accurate alternative to the Bracketology selections of other major sports websites.
Rather than predict teams based on the season ending today, or make wild predictions of the future, Bracketology 101 uses a unique "projection-prediction" method of selecting teams, giving fans a much more realistic idea of where their favorite teams stand in the eyes of the selection committee.
While other bracketologists favor conferences or teams or rely entirely on RPI rankings in making their picks, we factor in a team's resume as a whole - big wins, bad losses, in and out-of-conference wins, upcoming schedules, conference tournament sites, and each team's overall strengths and weaknesses compared to other teams on the bubble. Our "Field of 68" is updated every Monday throughout the season, with daily updates coming during Championship Week.

Join The B101 Team!

Do you want to advertise on Bracketology 101 during March Madness? Do you want to sponsor one of our upcoming daily brackets? E-mail us at bracketologyblog@yahoo.com for ad rates and details.

Follow B101 On Twitter

Bracketology 101 is now on Twitter! To follow B101 on Twitter, just click on the Twitter logo above.

How B101 Stacks Up

The numbers speak for themselves: Over the last five years, Bracketology 101 is the most accurate bracketology site on the Internet. We produced the best bracket in 2006, the second best in 2007 and 2008, and the fifth best in 2009. We are the only bracketologists to produce a Top 5 bracket four of the last five years. No other bracketologist has placed in the Top 5 more than twice. For a complete breakdown of our bracket stats from the last four years, click on the “We’re #1!” logo above.

The 40-60 Club

On top of correctly predicting 64 of the 65 tournament teams in 2008, Bracketology 101 also became the first bracketology site to ever seed 40 teams exactly and 60 teams within one seed line of their actual seed. Through 2010, we are the only bracketology site to earn this distinction.