P.E.T.A.: Animal Rights, Human Abuse

With over 850,000 active members, the animal rights organization People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has blossomed into an exceptionally powerful speech community. Their main goal is to enlighten others about the prominent existence of animal cruelty in the world, hoping to gain enough power to abolish it, or at least prevent it from happening as often as it does. PETA uses language as a tool of power, verbalizing its message through controversial ad campaigns, rallies, marches and protests. PETA has also been very successful in using this tool in courts of law, filing lawsuits against those who they believe to be treating animals immorally, and pushing to get proper legislation passed to help their cause. After using language to create and maintain power, the burning question is, "How is this acquired power going to be used?" Despite the innocent intention of giving a voice to abused animals and trying to ameliorate their living (and dying) conditions, the PETA organization is guilty of abusing their acquired power by insulting and exploiting the public and manipulating thousands of minds with biased information and deceiving campaigns, while failing to take responsibility for the negative effects of its actions. PETA was founded 25 years ago in order to protect the rights of animals, specifically in places where they are commonly abused (laboratories, food-producing factories, the clothing and entertainment industries). Over the years, they have used the power of language to achieve success through informative films, speeches, public education, advertising etc . In order for any organization to have power and influence, it must first discover and follow the idea of "strength in numbers," gathering as many followers as possible. One way that they attract many members is by exploiting the presence of pity, which becomes present, for example, after witnessing one of their shockingly graphic films in which animals are slaughtered and tortured. They also are not afraid to use the power of persuasion, insisting that every individual can make a difference. This can be seen through one of their constantly repeated mottos: "We can't stop all suffering, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't stop any." After initial increasing popularity of the organization, the most prominent method of attracting members however has become the boasting of a great amount of celebrity involvement in the movement. Celebrities such as Pamela Anderson, Kim Bassinger and Dennis Rodman are very active members of the organization, appearing in many campaign ads and voicing their opinions on television whenever they get a chance. Testimonials are used as a form of propaganda, attracting many fans to the organization. These are all the most direct and fair methods PETA uses to attract members, creating power. Members of the organization are not ashamed to use other, less respectable ways in order gain that power. One of the most commonly used way for PETA to gain more power in the form of followers is through insulting, disdaining and condescending language in regards to those who either oppose or do not already belong to the movement. The targeted people habitually include laboratory researchers, factory farm workers, clothes designers, meat-eaters, and fur-wearers. Most of the time, members of the organization do not directly call out people or groups by name, but express their opinions through general insults or complaints to the world. However, bolder spokespeople of the group often revert to direct name-calling and grotesque insulting. This is clearly seen through a statement made by Pamela Anderson, published in Jane magazine: "People who wear fur smell like a wet dog if they're in the rain. And they look fat and gross. They look like really immature, unenlightened, stupid people. When people are so blatant about cruelty, it makes me nauseous. . . . [E]very season, [the furriers] put propaganda everywhere that fur is taking off...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...﻿
AnimalRights: A Human Dilemma
DeVry University
August 21, 2012
Abstract
Medical research conducted in scientific laboratories utilizing certain animals and tissue for the purposes of biomedical research is critical to the continued health of society. Utilizing animals for medical research is a legal and allowable method under specific restrictions placed by law. This research over time reveals methods for cures, treatments, medical devices and the ultimate eradication of disease for humans and animals alike. However, it also presents an argument and ethical dilemma for animalrights activist groups who believe medical research using animals is cruelty to animals and must be discontinued. Conversely, medical scientists have a duty to society to protect the world from environmental factors that would cause illness and mass death unnecessarily. For this reason, it is essential that a common ground or balance of needs be determined between these two groups so that the continuation of life is uninterrupted by disagreements in the ethics of right and wrong.
AnimalRights: A Human Dilemma
The ills of society extend the continuum from overpopulation to obesity and global warming to the extinction of life, as we know it. To that end, some would...

...AnimalRights
Ever since The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in
England in 1824 was formed there has been long running debates on the topic of
animalrights. The first societies were formed to protect and maintain human
treatment of work animals, such as cattle, horses and house hold pets. Towards
the end of the 19th century more organizations were formed, this time to protest
the use of animals in scientific experimentation. In today's society groups
such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have continued these
traditional fights as well as adding new agendas. These new agendas include
hunting and fishing, and dissection of animals in science classes. This paper
will discuss the pros and cons of animal experimentation and research, animals
in the classroom, animal organizations and hunting. Along with these topics my
personal opinion will be stated, before and after researching the topic.
The rights of animals have always been important to me during my life.
This is due to the fact that I have had a dog for a pet for as long as I
remember. On this topic I feel as though having domesticated animals in the home
is fine as long as proper care is taken of them. As for more controversial issue
like...

...2014
Non-HumanAnimalRights
Do non-humananimals have rights? Animalrights debates are incredibly controversial. Animalrights activists argue for animal’s rights whereas others argue that animals have no rights. Animals have many rights, which is why there are laws set in place to protect animals. Animals have rights to protect themselves from animal cruelty. When taking into consideration animalrights, humans need to consider animalrights laws, animalabuse (using animals as food and testing), animalrights support groups, and animal cruelty stories.
Animalrights is defined as “the rights of animals, claimed on ethical grounds, to the same humane treatment and protection from exploitation and abuse that are accorded to humans” according to ("Animalrights | Define Animalrights at Dictionary.com"). According to ("Stray Pet Advocacy" par 4) Throughout the entire United States, there are laws prohibiting cruelty to...

...Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience that animals should not be used in circuses.
Central Idea: Eliminating the use of animals in circuses, will help with animal extinction and mistreatment.
I. Attention
How many of you, with a show of hands, have been to a circus? If not, have you at least seen clips or examples from movies or on television? From the look of those animals you wouldn’t exactly think that they are abused or mistreated. Here is a clip that will show you otherwise. (Show video from www.ringlingbeatsanimals.com) These animals are beaten, shocked, and even starved for the sake of entertainment.
Persuasive Claim: Today I am here to persuade you that the abuse to animals in circuses is wrong and that there should be strict laws that prevent this abuse.
Orienting Material
In my presentation I am going to convince you why these strict laws should be put in place. I will first talk to you about Elephants and how between poachers and circuses, they are going extinct. Then I will show you the truth on how these circus animals are trained and treated.
Credibility
I feel that I am credible speaking to you about this topic because I have done extensive research on elephants and circus animals. Also, I’m credible because I am an advocate against the mistreatment of animals.
Transition:...

...AnimalAbuse
Trisha Westbrook
How is animalabuse linked to humanabuse? What is animalabuse? Abuse is define to be a misuse or mistreatment and attempt to harm another person or thing. Several studies have shown that animalabuse and neglect may indicate that others in the home maybe at risk of abuse and neglect, also. Abuse has become a common place across the nation and taking on many different forms of abuse. It is believed that animals as well as humans have every right to a good life just as those who physically, psychologically, and sexually perform such act against them.
Physical abuse is known as to involving contact intended to cause feelings of intimidation, injury, or other physical suffering or bodily harm. It is said, “Physical abuse is when a person hits, slam, pulls hair, harms by use of weaponry, murder, bites, or burns. Whereas physical neglect is failure or delay to provide healthcare, abandonment an expulsion. Neglect is also includes leaving a child under inadequate supervision, nutrition, hygiene and clothing as well as in regards to safety and welfare”(Jilani. Difference between Abuse and Neglect. May 6, 2010)
Animal and human...

...Animals Deserve Rights Not Abuse
Brandie Killgore
DeVry University
Animals have been seen as a lower species for decades. They have little to no rights and are sometimes treated inhumanely. No rights are given to them, so when they are abused there is little to no consequences. Hit an animal, make them live in dirty environments, forgot to feed them, leave them in the hot temperatures with no water, or torture them and the consequences are minor compared to the cruelty forced on that animal. Animals should have certain rights so that abusers can have harsher consequences which in turn could help with future crimes, but doesn’t mean that they can’t be raised to feed our society or be used for other services.
For centuries animals have been used by society to perform different duties. They are food for our families, they help the disabled, used for transportation, and other jobs. Yet if asked some still believe that they are just animals and were put on this earth to service people, not be equals nor have rights. For years animal activists have been trying to get society to see animals more clearly for what they are, living breathing beings. Some people believe that animalrights activists care more about...

...﻿AnimalRights versus HumanRights
Currently, the state of California is going through a severe drought. Almost all of California is in this state of drought, with 70% suffering from an “extreme” case of drought. Farmers have very little water for their crops, and their methods for getting more water are being blocked. A bill proposing that water be diverted from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to provide the much needed water for drought-ridden farms was shot down because it would potentially harm salmon in the river. Environmentalists claimed that taking water from the delta would limit the breeding grounds for the salmon; therefore it should not be done. The water from the delta would have enabled farmers to produce a large amount of crops, thus feeding the people of California and providing income for the farmers facing increased debt. The action of the environmentalists poses a highly debated question: Should animals have the same rights that humans do? While animals should not be mistreated or abused, they should not have the same rights as humans, but animalrights activists and environmentalists are trying to push this movement to the extreme. When considering the basic needs of humans, animals should not be given equal consideration.
From the beginning of time,...

...Every day animals are abused and it’s simply ignored. Humans think it’s okay to take out their sick acrions on these helpless animals, just because they cannot talk. Animal cruelty issues are the people’s issues. When animals are abused the people are at risk as well. 13% of intentional animalabuse cases involve domestic abuse violence. Animal cruelty is no longer a ‘little’ issue, this can lead to long term psychological effects to not only the animals but the humans as well. This leaves the animals hopeless, hurt and feeling abandoned. The animals are silent. We are the voice for the animals.
When animals are being abused they are left psychologically damaged and cannot do anything about it. Common victims are usually house hold pets such as the cat and dog, but can be farm animals and wild animals. These animals suffer because they are neglected and mistreated by not giving them food, water or shelter (basic care). This goes on for so long they die of misery and incorrect care. Not only do the animals suffer from psychological pain they endure emotional damage which creates a much longer lasting pain. An animal that has never been physically struck can still suffer the equal amount of pain...