Those are not particularly funny, but they based in truth and they are memorable.

Those are the kinds of things that BUGSters deliberately avoid discussing.

Not only do the BUGSters themselves scrupulously avoid discussing those things (racial differences, Jews, Holohoax), they try to coerce others not to discuss them either. Jason Speaks (Jason Here on SF) used to whine and complain and harass constantly on TOO about the fact that people were saying things that a BUGSter would not say, and now you see on this thread that some of these people are trying to put pressure on me to stop criticizing Jews, as if "anti-Semitism" and White survival were somehow antithetical.

The BUGSters seem to think that their way is head-and-shoulders above Dr. Pierce's, and that their kosher-conservative, conflict-avoiding circumlocutions somehow represent a revolutionary new form of rhetoric that beats the pants off of simply telling the truth.

The hardest thing for us in White advocacy is to establish credibility for what we say. It's easier for us to establish credibility and gain the respect of listeners or readers if we are not seen to be dancing around core issues as BUGSters do. People notice that, and it makes them distrustful. Dr. Pierce never did that, and because of that I think even his enemies respected him.

There are times when I'm given to express myself in what you'd call an analogy or metaphor and I hope you'll forgive me for doing so in this response.

In my view; I'd not get all that upset with Hadding; it's not like he's anything other than Williams's dog. Williams feeds him a few scraps every so often, pats him on the head while telling him what a good boy he is and Hadding gives him those puppy dog eyes and barks happily. Figuratively speaking that is.

Stray dogs often make excellent pets and can sometimes be trained to do all kinds of things.

WTF are you talking about? This calling Hadding a stray dog is supposed to be analogous to something that's actual? Forget the metaphor, or simile, or figurative Bugsterism, or whatever this cryptic crap is -- spit it out so I can respond to what you're getting at.

Quote:

If you'll recall Williams mentioned a few pages back where he and his Hadding attended a Stormfront Conference.

There you go again. My Hadding? What are you trying to tell the readers?

Quote:

That happened at a time when Williams was banned from Stormfront as I'm given to understand.

You're given to understand wrong, numnuts.

For the record, I first joined Stormfront in 1995, left in 1996, voluntarily, to pursue other things. Look at my posts and you'll see I came back to SF in 1/2007. I was booted by that little "positive only" twerp of a mod -- I forget his name; he runs WNN -- who was a "Gaede groupie," as Don Black described him. Don told me this when he invited me, unsolicited, to attend the East Tennessee seminar in 9/11. I already knew April "Shewolf" Gaede had me bounced back then because a SM member at the time showed me the semi-private messages there between her and that twerp and some others. She was "uncomfortable having me on the same discussion board she was on." I simply never posted to SF again until four years later, after Don invited me back. I immediately put cyberstalking drama queen Gaede on Ignore where she and only she has been ever since.

Quote:

I'm willing to bet Hadding was a bit more well behaved and didn't urinate on the carpet so-to-say, as Williams became un-banned shortly thereafter. I'm given to understand some amount of Backside Kissing (It was a bit more colorfully put.) went on during that conference.

Your source for this nonsense is as full of beans as you are.

Quote:

I'll be willing to state the obvious in that there's a Sub-Section of Stormfront called "Third Annual Practical Politics Seminar 2013". I'm not a betting man but it'd not be much of a gamble to say Hadding is not running around that Sub-Forum marking his territory and carrying-on in the same way he's doing here.

Your characterization of what Hadding is doing here is, let's say, piss poor. You can't make a sound case for your Mantra to Hadding's criticism of it so you resort to this not-so-clever stray doggie ad hominem. Tsk, tsk!

Quote:

You'd think for all his barking about fear, truth, lies, deception, whatever; he'd be up there setting them straight on this Mantra stuff but he seems quite lacking in any virtue he pretends to champion.

The fact is, your Mantra, not to mention Covington's, is not entirely defensible. It's one means to the end we all strive for, hopefully, but not the only one, and certainly not the best one, as I and others see it.

BTW, I was invited up to the podium at the first SF seminar by one of the Bugsters, where I expounded for several minutes on the importance of moral courage in our activists -- no mantra. Don allowed me five minutes or so, in advance, to address the attendees from the front of the hall at the second annual seminar. There was no urination on the carpet by me, Hadding or anyone else. Your unnamed source for how the seminars went sucks.

I'm curious. Do you not have to answer to anyone as a Bugster when you make such a fool of yourself in the name of Bugsterism? Were you to behave like this as a known Alliance member, representing NA as you do Bugsterism, I'd have reported you to the Chairman and recommended you be expelled for cause, or at least suspended, and be made an example for how not to comport oneself. Sorry.

__________________

We need ethics; we need values and standards; we need a world view. And if one wants to call all of these things together a religion, then we need a religion. One might choose instead, however, to call them a philosophy of life. Whatever we call it, it must come from our own race soul: it must be an expression of the innate Aryan nature. And it must be conducive to our mission of racial progress. -Dr. William Pierce, in NATIONAL ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP HANDBOOKwww.natall.com

What would the "petitions" have to accomplish, and in what span of time, for you to credit them with having "worked"?(I'm extremely interested in your answer. It hasn't occurred to me to wonder what people here would consider success. To my mind the "petitions" are already successful.Very successful...they're sitting there on display spreading our memes and phrases. But I want them to be hugely successful.)

As for the other, if you had fears, you overcame them, since one month at least, you added initials to them. Others here have not overcome their stated fears, and others, as I mentioned in the essay, don't understand what we're doing..

That's a fair question.... I guess I'd never though about it so I don't have a fair answer to give you in return.

Plus, by your definition, they are working by virtue of people seeing them. I'm not sure what I expect so I guess you got me. The word "results" came to mind but I'm not even sure how I would define that in this context.

I will say again as I've said before, as long as people are trying things, I am in favor of them trying those things whether I'm optimistic about success or not. So long as it's something that won't actually hurt our movement anyway.

So far as fear goes, everybody dies someday. I live for something that matters so I'm not afraid to die. Once you've gotten to that point, you don't really have any reason to be afraid of much else.

The BUGSters seem to think that their way is head-and-shoulders above Dr. Pierce's, and that their kosher-conservative, conflict-avoiding circumlocutions somehow represent a revolutionary new form of rhetoric that beats the pants off of simply telling the truth.

There is nothing wrong with using mantras, but they should be adapted to the situation or topic at hand. I was just thinking, which mantra would a Bugster use were he to show up at the NRA Convention that was underway this week in Houston? "Anti-racist is code for anti-White?" That wouldn't work. Something about geNOcide? I think not. Is there a Bugsterism for opposing the gun grabbers? Maybe there is. I don't know.

An Alliance member and I flew out to Las Vegas in the mid 1990s when the NRA held its big convention there. We stood out in front of the main entrance of the massive Convention Center for several hours wearing sandwich boards showing a BATF Agent in full SWAT gear with the caption, "Is your Church BATF Approved?" -- a lovely mantra by its own rights -- and we handed out literally thousands of the hard-hitting, fact-filled Alliance leaflet Gun Control in America. We also handed out Who Rules America? and What is the National Alliance? to some of those we engaged in conversations. Several media folks interviewed us, including one particularly stunning lady journalist from a magazine in Australia who I won't soon forget. We were well received by the NRA members for the most part. Several joined the Alliance. The trip was worth the effort to us.

A couple of years later the NRA had its big annual convention in Charlotte, right up the road from my home. I made up a very professional looking placard on heavy construction board the night before and I and a couple of other Alliance members headed for Charlotte early the next morning. We worked our way into the crowd of circling protesters who were anti-NRA and whipped out our placard. One of my men marched around with it like he absolutely belonged with the rest of the protesters.

The letters were much larger and the words better proportioned than in this example, of course, but you get the idea.

I took a couple of pictures of our member carrying that sign over his head, one of which appeared a few days later on the front of our monthly internal Membership BULLETIN, with Web address legible and a suitable caption by Dr. Pierce, as an example of what our members could be doing.

The punch line is that the memorable, reality-based mantra on that sign created sheer pandemonium among the lame, but "respectable" leftist protestors. "You can't say that," one told me. "Yours will be the only sign that media will focus on!!"

No Shiite, Sherlock. That was the whole point of the exercise. We were out of there within 15 minutes, photo in hand, mission accomplished.

Hadding, I wonder if that BULLETIN is archived at the WLP Legacy blog that's linked in your sig file. It would have been the same month as that Charlotte convention, or the next. Couldn't find it Googling.

There is nothing wrong with using mantras, but they should be adapted to the situation or topic at hand. I was just thinking, which mantra would a Bugster use were he to show up at the NRA Convention that was underway this week in Houston? "Anti-racist is code for anti-White?" That wouldn't work. Something about geNOcide? I think not. Is there a Bugsterism for opposing the gun grabbers? Maybe there is. I don't know.

What you think is the BUGSter mantra is really only the last line of it. That line is okay: it's simple and direct. The rest of BUGSter rhetoric is not simple and direct: it's convoluted and tenuous, as it must be to dance around anti-White myths like the Holohoax and racial equality.

In the bizarro world of BUGSter theory, Jews want people to challenge the Holohoax or racial equality so that they can use the opportunity to call that person a nazi, racist, or anti-Semite. Therefore the clever BUGSters outwit the Jews by not challenging the Holohoax or racial equality, nor criticizing Jewish power.

That's also why Anti-Racist Hitler never tells its viewers that Jews have pushed for non-White immigration in the West.

This is what makes the BUGSters elite and much cleverer than the rest of us: that they alone understand how to outwit the Jews.

What you think is the BUGSter mantra is really only the last line of it. That line is okay: it's simple and direct. The rest of BUGSter rhetoric is not simple and direct: it's convoluted and tenuous, as it must be to dance around anti-White myths like the Holohoax and racial equality.

In the bizarro world of BUGSter theory, Jews want people to challenge the Holohoax or racial equality so that they can use the opportunity to call that person a nazi, racist, or anti-Semite. Therefore the clever BUGSters outwit the Jews by not challenging the Holohoax or racial equality, nor criticizing Jewish power.

That's also why Anti-Racist Hitler never tells its viewers that Jews have pushed for non-White immigration in the West.

This is what makes the BUGSters elite and much cleverer than the rest of us: that they alone understand how to outwit the Jews.

Get it?

Pretty interesting coming from a guy who can't even affirm his goal is to
fulfill the 14 Words

8th Time,
Do you accept that flooding EVERY White country with 3rd Worldersto create a 'blended humanity' is GENOCIDE ?

2nd Time,Is your purpose to secure the existence of our people and a
future for White children, or to have 'intellectual discussion' ?

What you think is the BUGSter mantra is really only the last line of it. That line is okay: it's simple and direct. The rest of BUGSter rhetoric is not simple and direct: it's convoluted and tenuous, as it must be to dance around anti-White myths like the Holohoax and racial equality.

In the bizarro world of BUGSter theory, Jews want people to challenge the Holohoax or racial equality so that they can use the opportunity to call that person a nazi, racist, or anti-Semite. Therefore the clever BUGSters outwit the Jews by not challenging the Holohoax or racial equality, nor criticizing Jewish power.

That's also why Anti-Racist Hitler never tells its viewers that Jews have pushed for non-White immigration in the West.

This is what makes the BUGSters elite and much cleverer than the rest of us: that they alone understand how to outwit the Jews.

Get it?

You refuse to say you oppose white genocide.

You refuse to explain why.

Then you pretend not to understand the concept of "staying on message" vis-a-vis talking about white genocide as opposed to not white genocide distractions such as TheSixMillion or "The Blank Slate Theory" that the anti-whites don`t even believe in.

You`re a real joker are`nt ya Hadding?

You have to be for criticising us for "not mentioning Jewish culpability" in a video starring the jews being wiped out using their methods and their own words.

And what bizarro world do you live in not to notice anti-whites relish pro-whites talking about anything other than white genocide to let them off the responsibility and guilt hook?

There is nothing wrong with using mantras, but they should be adapted to the situation or topic at hand. I was just thinking, which mantra would a Bugster use were he to show up at the NRA Convention that was underway this week in Houston? "Anti-racist is code for anti-White?" That wouldn't work. Something about geNOcide? I think not. Is there a Bugsterism for opposing the gun grabbers? Maybe there is. I don't know.

How about? --

If we White people had a country of our own, this would not be happening.