It's only three sentences long AND it has a random statement about the 1960's...? If this section was a paragraph long and didn't mention the 1960's, the article would do better on VFH. Why? Because it would look a lot better. If the intro was a slightly funny paragraph, the article score would be about a 42.

1 How to Be a Journalist (9)

Nice work there. I dig it. However, it isn't quite a "10".

2 Types of Journalists (8)

This part of the article was especially good, however I won't go in depth on this analysis.
First section: 10 (ha!).
Second section: 7 (too short).
Third section: 10 (woot!).
Fourth section: 5 (what the hell? random).

Please PLEASE get rid of every single link that isn't at the end of a sentence! In fact, get rid of ALL those damn links. Also, see my comments about the images. Add categories to your article, and the ending will look more like an ending. -2 for having no ending! bad "yourmotherhasmyunderwear" bad!!

Images:

6

I liked the images, but they are all squished into the end. Also, they look weird: different sizes, one is way the hell on the left... line them up all nice 'n pretty!

Miscellaneous:

7.4

avg of all the other scores.

Final Score:

36.8

The only advice I have is to fix the formatting and make it longer. If you did that, you might have a feature on your hands (more likely a quasi-feature). I liked this article alot.

How do you make an article longer and feature worthy?

Talk about journalists through history. Like, ancient Egypt and so forth. Get creative.

Give a few examples of articles and people's reactions.

Give an ending, please. It just ends with Iraqi journalists, which is not an ending at all. Give the ending an oomph: make it about journalists in the future!

If you did those two things and had a longer intro, you would have about a 46/50, because that stuff takes a lot of work. Would it be worth it? YES. DO IT!