unless you were gonna get an old svt i dont know why anyone would opt to get a non rackmountable head. I realize it looks more classy, i think looks wise its cooler, but much less functional. Realistically a touring band is gonna throw their amps around and wouldnt you rather have it in a rackhead with your effects and such. I have the ampeg b4r so ill be checkthing this head out, but i think ill stick with mine if thats the only difference.

Lync,
How did you find that? I looked all over the Ampeg site and didn't see it. My slow computer could only download part of the picture but I would agree it looks likea B4r in the wooden ampeg case. Just like the SVT 350H is the same as the B2r.

My bass in your,
I assume you meant SVT200t. I still have mine and it sure is a sweet amp. I just wish they would make a more powerful version with that same pre amp section. (tone controls etc...)

My bass in your,
I assume you meant SVT200t. I still have mine and it sure is a sweet amp. I just wish they would make a more powerful version with that same pre amp section. (tone controls etc...)

Click to expand...

Oops, typo.
Yeah, I sold my SVT200T the other week. Loved the pre amp, but the power section wasn't loud enough to keep up with 2 guitarists with full stacks. I think I'm going for the SVP Cl + pwer amp now.
The 200T is a sweet amp indeed.

I'm with you on the solid state stuff. sounds great IMO.
Started back in the early 80's with a 70's B410 solid state combo. I switched to Hartke 3500 for awhile in the late 80's then back to an Ampeg SVT 200T in about '92. I still have that head but have put it into back up status after a good 10 years of use. Before I bought my B4r I thought I'd try the SVT3pro and it just didn't do it for me. I traded it back in after about 2 weeks and got the B4r and have been happy ever since. I guess I like the clean attack of the Ampeg solid state amps. They sound great with my 410he and SVT15e cabs.