Development is an integral part of the G20’s global economic agenda because it promotes many of the group’s essential tenets, such as shared economic growth, poverty reduction, and sustainable development. Infrastructure development—which includes advances and improvements to water and sewage systems, energy, transport, and more—directly impacts economic growth in poor countries.

The G20 High-Level Panel Report

One key decision made during the G20’s June meeting in Los Cabos, Mexico was to implement the recommendations of the HLP’s report. The report outlines criteria that governments and public and private institutions should use in deciding which infrastructure project to fund. The criteria includes: regional integration, political support, potential transformational impact, maturity of the project, institutional capacity, and potential attractiveness to the private sector. The HLP worked with multi-lateral development banks to identify 11 exemplary regional projects: five in Africa, two in the Middle East/North Africa, three in Asia, and one in Latin America/Caribbean. The projects vary widely in focus, ranging from railways to solar energy systems.

5 Governance Concerns with the HLP Report

Panel members at the U.S.-China-Brazil forum discussed and debated the criteria included in the HLP report. While some attendees supported some of the ideas put forth, the NGO members of the group, including WRI, identified a number of governance-related concerns, such as:

Heavy Emphasis on Large, Centralized Projects and the Private Sector: The HLP places priority on investment and involvement by the private sector as opposed to the public sector. In addition, projects deemed “exemplary” are generally large, centralized projects and as opposed to smaller, distributed projects. This is potentially problematic because selection—including whether to have large or small projects—should depend on country and local population needs, taking into account environmental and social considerations.

Limiting PPP Approach: The report recommends that public-private partnership (PPP) approaches tested in developed countries be adopted for use in developing nations. This policy may be limiting, though, because institutions, norms, and practices in these developed nations may be entirely incongruous to developing countries,

Inadequate Risk-Mitigation Requirements: Infrastructure projects in any country— especially developing countries where governance structures are still being developed—are highly vulnerable to political, regulatory, and execution risks. In addition to economic risk (which is discussed in the report), environmental, social, regulatory, and political risks are threats to the success of a project, but they are not mentioned in the HLP report. People approving infrastructure projects should generally be interested in seeing how risks are identified, mitigated, and managed, so introducing safeguards or relevant policies—which are not mentioned in the report—would strengthen the likelihood that a project would be approved. Safeguards and environmental/social standards should be included as a form of risk assessment, and could be used as either an extra criterion or an underlying aspect of the other criteria.

Stakeholder Engagement: It is important for a host country to have ownership of a project to make it successful over the long-term. Projects should be aligned with the country’s goals and citizens’ demands. Public participation, accountability, and transparency are all important for public works sector projects. While the HLP report mentions stakeholders, the focus is on financiers and operators. This leaves out a significant portion of some of the most important stakeholders, such as civil society and affected communities.

Financial Concerns: There is concern among civil society about the ability of low-income nations to repay debts arising from large infrastructure projects, an issue not discussed in the HLP report. In addition, there is a risk many consumers in project countries will be unable to afford access to these new infrastructure services.

Focus on Environmental and Social Sustainability

Good governance is essential to the long-term success of infrastructure investments in the developing world. In fact, it is an indispensable component of any successful infrastructure project. As G20 leaders consider how to implement the recommendations of the HLP report, they should ensure that strong governance, as well as environmental and social sustainability, are at the forefront of the agenda.

Related articles

Climate change adaptation in water management is a water governance issue. While neither climate change nor water respects national borders, adaptation in water management should be treated as a transboundary water governance issue. However, transboundary water management is, in essence, more complex than national water management because the water management regimes usually differ more between countries than within countries. This paper provides 63 lessons learned from almost a decade of cooperation on transbounda...

The flux of foreign investment into the water industry that took place over recent decades had a significant impact on the relationship between water companies and states. The creation of a global network of international investment agreements also altered the method of adjudication of possible disputes between the parties. The emergence of global water markets and the advent of Public–Private Partnerships led to the emergence of what has been called Global Water Governance. This articles analyses how the decisions...

We compare water governance between China and India in terms of water laws, policies and administration based on a survey of 182 water experts from 19 provinces/states. We find that water governance in China is consistently stronger compared with India across 17 indicators of water governance. We speculate that these variations could be attributed to differences in political, legal and administrative systems as well as levels of economic development and political system.

Severe water pollution is among the top policy priorities in both China and India. This paper undertakes a comparative case analysis to examine efforts in combating river pollution in two major rivers – the Yangtze in China and the Ganga in India. Our analysis suggests that efforts in combating river pollution in the two Asian giants have encountered substantial challenges, such as the lack of comprehensive legal mechanisms to control pollution at the basin level, the lack of coordination among multiple government...

Despite it being the official start of British summer, many locations have continued to be hit by severe flooding in the last few weeks. Locations all over the UK have been struck by severe weather warnings, and many properties have been left damaged by the continued rainfall. Unfortunately this is not considered remarkable. The UK has already seen heavy flooding since the year started, following on from years of previously high flood levels.
With such severe damage to properties and livelihoods being commonplace,...

Customer comments

No comments were found for Improved governance needed in G20's Report on infrastructure development. Be the first to comment!

Add your comment

Great! comment successfully added!

Contact

Your message:

Your email

Your first name

Your last name

I would like to receive periodic email updates and special offers from select suppliers.