[QUOTE]The Bundeswehr has about as much bite as an old lady whose teeth are in the cup.[/QOUTE]

Yes, absolutely. And I love your analogy.

Quote:

Far as Chomsky goes, yes youre right. There are things I believe he is aware about but will not approach. He seems content to line his pockets with his diatribes against Gentile machinations, or Jewish ones that he forgets to mention are Jewish.

Few Jews have the stones to venture far from the reservation.

Quote:

Chomsky apparently spent a bit of time drifting around Professor Faurrison, however a clamor of screeches from his colleagues ended that rather rapidly.

If you read the real history of the Yalta and Potsdam conferrences(John Flyn, etc.), you will see that Roosevelt had made a secret agreement with Stalin that Russian troops!, and NOT USA troops would invade Japan if that was needed. Therefore, the A-Bombs were known by all at top levels to be NOT NEEDED! Another allied atrocity just like Dresden. By the way, I am doing a talk at the Schenectady Library(Schenectady, NY) on Wed. Feb.9th, about the Dresden firebombing!Anyone with suggestions-all advice is welcome. It's time to tell the TRUE story!

They did not need long-range bombers because they wouldn't have a return flight, and they could be launched from a submarine or carrier.

16

First DO you know HOW MUCH A-Bombs of those era weighed? They were very heavy and inefficient devices compared to modern versions. If I remember correct they weighed about six metric tons. I doubt Japanese had even that big aircrafts which can lift such a weight.
What comes to carriers Japanese had not any real carriers at that time, I do not remember if they had at that time carriers at all. Also it is highly questionable even if they had carriers, could any sizeble Japanese naval force
had managed to sail without being detected to other side of Pacific. Americans had good patrolling systems. And also it is highly questionable could bombers with enough capacity manage to lift of from carrier.

What comes to subs they had same problems, especially Japanese subs really could not transport bomber big enough to carry an A-Bomb. Also American patrolling was so efficient that average lifetime of Japanese submarine crewman was about two weeks.

If you read the real history of the Yalta and Potsdam conferrences(John Flyn, etc.), you will see that Roosevelt had made a secret agreement with Stalin that Russian troops!, and NOT USA troops would invade Japan if that was needed. Therefore, the A-Bombs were known by all at top levels to be NOT NEEDED! Another allied atrocity just like Dresden. By the way, I am doing a talk at the Schenectady Library(Schenectady, NY) on Wed. Feb.9th, about the Dresden firebombing!Anyone with suggestions-all advice is welcome. It's time to tell the TRUE story!

Btw which one of those alternatives Japanese themselves would have preferred? Being A-bombed or invaded by commies inflicting millions of casualties, robberies, rapes etc. Also commies would had nice base to dominate whole waters of that area.

I'd say that that alternative which came to reality was better for Japanese and better for whole world.

I didn't say it was justified or not justified either. As I said, I'm merely thinking of the protestors' message and that the issue is not that simple. You can argue until you're blue in the face about the nature of war, what constitutes an atrocity, and what is justified. Apparently it was Germany's last gasp attempt to pool its resources with Japan's in a final stab, even if Japan may not have been able to complete the task.

First DO you know HOW MUCH A-Bombs of those era weighed? They were very heavy and inefficient devices compared to modern versions. If I remember correct they weighed about six metric tons. I doubt Japanese had even that big aircrafts which can lift such a weight.
What comes to carriers Japanese had not any real carriers at that time, I do not remember if they had at that time carriers at all. Also it is highly questionable even if they had carriers, could any sizeble Japanese naval force
had managed to sail without being detected to other side of Pacific. Americans had good patrolling systems. And also it is highly questionable could bombers with enough capacity manage to lift of from carrier.

What comes to subs they had same problems, especially Japanese subs really could not transport bomber big enough to carry an A-Bomb. Also American patrolling was so efficient that average lifetime of Japanese submarine crewman was about two weeks.

Well then, six metric tons.... I guess you are right. They did have carriers sufficient enough, but at that time, their fleet was beat down and dwindling, so you are right on that too. Oh well, they could have sent a german sub comander for the job, but germany already surrendered.
*stands down to HengistDuval*

Apparently it was Germany's last gasp attempt to pool its resources with Japan's in a final stab, even if Japan may not have been able to complete the task

Exactly...even if they may not have been able to complete the task! therefore it was not a "preventive" strike by the Americans it was a means of liquadating the opposition. God knows if Japan kept on with their "pride" and kept on fighting the Americans, that very Island today would not even exist anymore, America would just have kept on bombing. Everytime no matter how much they dropped the last one would be dedicated to the people of pearl harbour, "That's for pearl harbour"! nonsense! I completely agree with ChainedLightning, we shouldn't argue about this, However...I asked for links to those accusations and I'm waiting, nothing. Don't care if he believes what he believes aslong as he shares a bit of the "information" and where he "obtained" it, it's one thing to fight with another white, completely another thing to re-write history. Don't we already have people that continiously re-writes history for us?!?

Well then, six metric tons.... I guess you are right. They did have carriers sufficient enough, but at that time, their fleet was beat down and dwindling, so you are right on that too. Oh well, they could have sent a german sub comander for the job, but germany already surrendered.
*stands down to HengistDuval*

5

Americans had big problems for getting B25 Mitchells lift of from carrier. I doubt they would get for example B-17 or B-29 lift off from carrier. I doubt they could even lift off from Nimitz-class carrier.

Japanese had not bombers with enough capacity or carriers big enough for bombers, even today's United States have not that kind of carriers.

I agree with hengist on that one , They had to strip the B25 Mitchell half naked to get enough lift for it at that time Here is Japan's bombers

Mitsubishi G4M Betty (2400) - long range light bomber, operated by the japanese navy during the entire war, carrying one ton of bombs, or a big 800kg torpedo. Like other japanese aircraft, its long range was achieved by lack of armor, which made it very vulnerable. Late types had improved armor. Just before the end of the war the G4M was modified to carry the Okha kamikaze missile, with a suicide pilot and a powerful 1.2 ton warhead. Once released, the Okha had a range of 20 to 50 miles, depending on its release altitude, and a final dive speed of 600mph, but with strong american air superiority, most Okha-carrying bombers were intercepted before reaching release range.

Mitsubishi Ki-21 Sally (2000) - long range light bomber, operated by the japanese army air force over south east asia during the entire war, carrying one ton of bombs. It was poorly protected, but where it operated it usually faced thinner fighter opposition than other bombers.

The b-29 Superfortress's were used to drop the nuke's because it was the only one in the american arsenal capable of carrying such weight, NO ONE in world war two came even close to achieving such a Bomber its why it was the best bomber of that era.

It would be physically impossible to drop anything of that magnitude with a 2 engine light bomber as Japan's.