Playing in Your Opponent's Backyard

In last week's column we discussed a hustler's trick where he would offer you a position where you could choose White or Black and the hustler would take the opposite side and beat you.

Sometimes top chess players borrow this trick from the hustler's toolbox. Judge for yourself:

This is game #38 of the first marathon World Championship match Karpov - Kasparov. This wasn't the most exciting game to put it mildly, but look at what happened the very next day. Apparently, Karpov wasn't satisfied by his own treatment of this variation and he was interested to know what Kasparov considered the best defense for Black. Of course he could politely ask his opponent, but since it was the World Championship Match he pretty much knew how Kasparov would answer . So, Karpov used the simplest method to find out the answer, he played the same variation as White!

So, Kasparov showed Karpov how to play this position for Black and therefore the case was closed, right? Not so fast! Karpov knew better... he suspected that Kasparov didn't show everything and still kept an ace up his sleeve. So, when in the next game of their match the opponents had the familiar position Karpov deviated first!

Yes, Karpov suffered through the whole game, but managed to escape for a draw. We'll never know what Kasparov had prepared in case Karpov followed their previous games, but I believe that somehow Karpov's legendary intuition saved him again. An indirect proof of some sort can be found in the next episode. The year was 1983 and Kasparov was facing Victor Korchnoi in a 'Candidate's match'. In order to win the match Kasparov needed just half a point out of the two remaining games, but as he admitted in his book, he wanted to finish the match with "an exclamation mark"!

Fastforward 18 years and the FIDE World Champion Rustam Kasimdzhanov used Kasparov's idea... against Kasparov!

This game is very interesting on many levels. First of all it is a very fine example of Kasparov's trademark energetic play, where his opponent virtually gets annihilated. Secondly, the game features a unique double blunder--both super GMs missed a simple move (10...Be5!) which won instantly. I truly hope that our readers would do much better since we discussed this typical pattern previously: http://www.chess.com/article/view/typical-patterns-everyone-should-know-the-trapped-rook

And finally, just like that hustler, Kasparov showed 'how to promote the pawn', but still had some surprises left for his opponent!

Even if you are not going to play Kasparov in your next tournament, the lesson is simple. Say your opponent is an expert in a certain opening, it definitely makes sense to play some other variation, or even surprise your opponent before he surprises you! We discussed this approach in a number of articles, for instance: http://www.chess.com/article/view/how-to-learn-an-opening-in-one-hour

Good luck!

Commenti

I HAVE TRIED THIS TRICK WITH THE PLAYER WHOSE RATINGS WERE HIGHER THAN ME EVEN BEFORE READING THIS ARTICLE . THIS TRICK HAS A GREAT ADVANTAGE TO BOTH THE PLAYER AS ONE GETS TO LEARN AND OTHER GETS TO SHARPEN HIS KNOWLEGDE ABOUT A PARTICULAR POSTION.

In the first game, is there any reason Kasparov didn't play 22. Nxa7? It looks like it wins a pawn and forks the queen and rook, winning the exchange. I think they both noticed it afterward, which is why Karpov tried to reach the same position, but Kasparov played 16. ... Rfd8 as black in the second game to avoid the fork - the only difference between the two games before move 22.

In the third diagram, doesn't 71. Ne7+ win the pawn? I don't understand 71. Nc3.

If the game plays out like you suggest, (71. Ne7+), black responds with 71. ... Kh5. Then after 72. Nxf5 Nxg5, if white takes the knight then black's king will take the remaining pawn and the game will be drawn by insufficient mating material. If white instead then moves his king, black then only needs to trade his knight for the pawn to achieve a draw which he will eventually do.

About the blunder it seems that if white just plays d6 and both black and white take the rooks that the game would at least be close since white would probably only eventually be down a pawn with both players having enemy bishops on their side.

Thank you, Adrenalyn, you have a good eye! Of course it is a mistake in the database I got the game from. The first 21 moves in two Karpov- Kasparov games are completely identical, therefore you are absolutely right, it is 16... Rfd8 and not Rfc8.

Help us finish translating:

We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!