Again the ACLU is stepping in to assist the parents. This has cost taxpayers over $100,000 to date. Bear in mind the parents voted on this policy and at this point a vast majority like the new policy.

Federal studies show students do better when the school has a uniform policy. Also, look at the people named in the policy, many of them just parents volunteering for the PTO. Why sue them for being volunteers?

Too often we have entitled parents wasting taxpayers' dollars when they don't like a new policy or set of rules. This is not the first time this has happened; look at the NIAA and girls' soccer in Las Vegas. NIAA lost over $50,000 in taxpayers' dollars, the student graduated and the policy is now in place.

My only question: Is your child so entitled they feel they need to be different? Why? Why waste taxpayer dollars?

If you don't like the policy, seek a variance to another school, now.

R.L. Jay, Reno

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Popular

Most Commented

More Headlines

Most Viewed

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Email this article

Costly uniform case speaks of entitlement

Here we go again, a set of entitled parents that didn't like the dismissal in lower courts of the Roy Gomm school uniform policy, so they plan to appeal ['Gomm's school uniform policy heads to court

A link to this page will be included in your message.

Real Deals

Flip, shop and save on specials from your favorite retailers in Reno, NV