On Tuesday, the singer Lizzo tweeted a video of one of the 2016 Democratic presidential debates accompanied by Lizzo’s song, “Truth Hurts,” which starts with the lyric, “Why men great ’til they gotta be great?”

Hillary Clinton, apparently alerted that someone still found her relevant, and eager to show that she’s a hip kind of gal, replied with the second line of the lyric — or, at least, the first part of the second line — tweeting, “I just took a DNA test, turns out…”

But as Twitchy noted, the rest of the second line of the lyric reads like this: ” — turns out I’m 100% that bitch.”
The lyric reads:
Why men great ’til they gotta be great?
Woo
I just took a DNA test, turns out I’m 100% that bitch
Even when I’m crying crazy
Yeah, I got boy problems, that’s the human in me
Bling bling, then I solve ’em, that’s the goddess in me
You coulda had a bad bitch, non-committal
Help you with your career just a little
You’re ‘posed to hold me down, but you’re holding me back

If that one word was the reason Hillary elided the second part of the line from the song, she could have substituted “nasty woman,” which is apparently a term more comfortable for her. In July 2017, as The Daily Wire reported, Hillary joined the cable channel TBS and Samantha Bee, host of “Full Frontal With Samantha Bee,” to sell t-shirts with the slogan “nasty woman” in order to fundraise $1 million for the “Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project” in Los Angeles County.

This is not the first time Hillary has taken a swing and knocked herself out; in July 2018, she attempted to take a swipe at President Trump after Trump did not initially reject an offer from Vladimir Putin that Russia be allowed to “question officials, including the officers of law enforcement and intelligence service of the United States.”

When White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked about whether Trump supported the idea, she responded, “The president’s going to meet with his team and we’ll let you know when we have an announcement on that.”

In response, Clinton tweeted an attack on Trump that reeked of hypocrisy, writing, “Ambassador @McFaul is a patriot who has spent his career standing up for America. To see the White House even hesitate to defend a diplomat is deeply troubling.”

Of course, defending diplomats might not have been the proper line from an attack from Hillary. As Greg Hicks, former Deputy Chief of Mission for Libya, noted of the failure of the State Department four years later in the attack launched in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 in which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens was murdered:

The Benghazi Committee’s report graphically illustrates the magnitude of her failure. It states that during August 2012, the State Department reduced the number of U.S. security personnel assigned to the Embassy in Tripoli from 34 (1.5 security officers per diplomat) to 6 (1 security officer per 4.5 diplomats), despite a rapidly deteriorating security situation in both Tripoli and Benghazi. Thus, according to the Report, “there were no surplus security agents” to travel to Benghazi with Amb. Stevens “without leaving the Embassy in Tripoli at severe risk.”

Had Ambassador Stevens’ July 2012 request for 13 additional American security personnel (either military or State Department) been approved rather than rejected by Clinton appointee Under Secretary of State for Management Pat Kennedy, they would have traveled to Benghazi with the ambassador, and the Sept. 11 attack might have been thwarted.