Re: Fwd: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm

From:

Sadrul Habib Chowdhury

Subject:

Re: Fwd: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm

Date:

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:25:00 -0500

User-agent:

Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

* Rhys Ulerich had this to say on [10 Dec 2009, 08:55:23 -0600]:
> Hi Sadrul,
>
> Did you see this note from me come across the GNU screen mailing list?
> It hasn't appeared yet in the archives, and I wonder if it's gotten
> swallowed somewhere. I wanted to make sure the reported issue wasn't
> lost.
I didn't get the mail. I am not sure where/why it got zapped.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rhys Ulerich <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM
> Subject: Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm
> To: address@hidden
>
>
> >> I have checked in a fix for this (revision e8d36bf1) [1]. It'd be great
> >> if you test it out and let me know if the performance is good. Also,
> >> testing for possible regression would be great.
>
> I'm also seeing great vertical split performance with the the savannah
> version (acd9b12b446f8baa673d928b4421948e07b7265e). Thank you.
>
> However, when vertically split, 'focus up' and 'focus down' do nothing
> when issued, either from a binding or from the prompt via
> "Control-A:focus up^M". All of 'focus', 'focus top', and 'focus
> bottom' do work as expected.
I am leaning towards saying 'not a bug' on this. With a horizontal split,
'focus left' or 'focus right' doesn't do anything either, and I think
that makes sense (note here that 'up/down/left/right' works as you would
expect it to with a complex grid-like layout).
Cheers,
Sadrul