Who would you rather have?

Just looking at Sidneys Contract and he's do to make a lot of money over the next 3 years(8.5,8.5 and 9 million). So it got me wondering if it was a possibility that the Hawks cut or trade Sidney, and maKe a move for someone like Mike Wallace. I think Mike Wallace would be pretty good in over Offense with Russell scrambling all over the place, but i also like the freedom we have in Sidney's contract with some big names coming up in FA the next couple of years.

Last edited by getnasty on Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Sydney's a good guy. I'm sure he realizes he's in a great situation again and is probably willing to restructure his deal. He's got the influence to pull Harvin into Seattle if Harvin isn't happy in Minny. Rice is a keeper for his personality and work ethic.

Yea, I also hope they work Sydney into the offense more than they did this year. My bet is Sydney will work himself in more by getting healthier and by getting more reps with #3 in this off-season. That's partly why #3 was so optimistic going into the off-season. My predictions for 2013-14: more BIG plays and fewer close games.

Wallace would be perfect, he's never really played anyway BUT streetball. Maybe he would be better suited for Wilson's style? For whatever reason, Wilson would be left with no options downfield after extending plays.

I think Rice has earned the respect and friendship of his teammates. I know he's earned mine. I would stick by him. I do like the prospect of adding another great receiver to the team, but more is only better if they fit in with the team and don't cause locker room issues.

“There’s no reason, with Mr. Allen and the fan base here and the stadium, that this can’t be a stable, long-term winning organization.” - John Schneider