Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Monday, March 28, 2016

Evolutionists admit single cell is too complicated to develop from 'nothing'.

A central dogmatic chant in Evolution and naturalism, is that at one time nothing exploded into everything and somehow the chaos of the exploded nothing, 'evolved' into the singular complexity of a single cell.

Some of Darwin's cult disavow abio-genesis, or life from non-life, or basically, something from nothing. But they are liars. Evolution preaches naturalism from beginning to end. It is disingenuous and malignant for a Darwinian-naturalist to scream that pond scum became the hysterical climate professor, than emphatically state that he does not believe in abiogenesis. Of course he does.

All of Evolution clearly states that life came from non – life which is in direct violation of the first Law of Thermodynamics.

Since the time of Crick and Watson and the discovery of DNA, it is clear that Evolution was about metaphysics and not real science. DNA can't form in nature by chaotic chance. Neither can RNA, Proteins, Peptide bonds, Ribosomes, or even a cell wall. Not one single experiment has replicated the formation of a single cell by chance, in a Lab. None.

Evolutionist's are getting depressed by it all:

Craig Venter’s team has published results of their latest attempt to strip down a living cell to bare essentials (the organism must be free-living, not parasitic). They’re calling it “Syn 3.0.” After years determining what a version of Mycoplasma mycoides bacterium could do without, they came up with a “synthetic” cell containing 473 genes deemed essential. They could not determine the function for 149 of the genes.

They failed of course to do anything intelligent. It was an epic bust. If they had a rudimentary understanding of software they would know that they can't artificially reproduce this complexity, and certainly not by 'evolving' stages. Either this bacteria has the code, or it doesn't. It is all or nothing.

“The big news is we failed,” Venter says. “I was surprised.” Neither chromosome produced a living microbe. It’s clear, Venter says, that “our current knowledge of biology is not sufficient to sit down and design a living organism and build it.”

How much money has been spent on this same issue in the past 50 years? How many failures, yet the peasant is hectored that Evolution is a 'fact'. Science fiction is not factual.

All of this leads to an obvious question. This little bacterium has to be able to copy its DNA, transcribe and translate it into protein, plus be able to coordinate all the steps involved in cell division. It has to be able to make all the things it can’t get from its environment. That’s a lot of information to be stored and used appropriately. Hence 473 genes.

Until Darwin's cult starts producing real science, with proof, that nothing creates everything, it should be confined to the department of metaphysics where it most certainly belongs. It is not science.