Tuesday, August 02, 2016

I read quite a bit but this is the most powerful political book I've ever read! Vox Day lays it out plain and simple - Western Civilization is in a VERY DANGEROUS situation right now because of reckless immigration policies created by liberals and politically correct cuckservatives. This book acknowledges that Donald Trump has played a huge role in pushing this very important issue to the forefront of political discussion.

Cuckservatives are so afraid to oppose uncontrolled mass migration from the Third World that they're instead willing to let the United States move away from Western Civilization and become less free. I'm Hispanic and I agree with the argument in this book that Hispanics are not natural conservatives/libertarians who favor limited government and a broad range of freedoms. The voting patterns of Hispanic immigrants, their children, and their grandchildren are evidence of these voting patterns but cuckservatives have let their own self-interest and fear of being called racist prevent them from standing up for the survival of the country. As the book points out, we also have seen a similar paralyzing fear in other parts of the West such as Western Europe where Third World immigrants are flooding in and failing to integrate because they don't embrace Western values, not because of any inherent racism on the part of the host country.

What I absolutely LOVED about this book the most is the bravery in talking about human biodiversity. The author points out that even the The Economist has written about a plethora of scientific research proving that there are biological differences between the races. And yes, this makes some races better at some things than others. Vox Day, Charles Murray, and Stefan Molyneux of Freedomain Radio are such brave souls to talk about this incredibly important but controversial topic. Ann Coulter briefly mentions this issue of IQ differences between the races in her book, "Adios America" but Vox Day really lays out the evidence without giving a damn about what is politically correct. How refreshing to find an honest, brave, and politically incorrect book like this standing up for Western Civilization!

It's hard for the older generation to realize things are as bad as they are. Trapped in memories and increasing isolation, they have no idea what the USA has become. It's all but impossible for the younger generation to realize what they have lost, or more precisely, of what they have been robbed.

Conservatives have betrayed America. Progressives have destroyed it. What remains is the tattered remnants of a nation that still cannot grasp that not only is it not stronger, healthier, and more powerful than ever before, but it is on the verge of collapsing under the weight of its invaders. The USA is like a cancer-stricken patient whose oncologist keeps assuring him that the cancer cells are white blood cells that are strengthening his immune system.

The great irony is that immigrationists point to the great waves of past immigration to whom the adulteration and ideological misdirecting of the nation can be directly traced, the Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians, and the Jews, and using them to justify the beneficial nature of the current wave of Central American, Asian, Arab, and African immigration.

But what we have witnessed is the invasion and destruction of the American nation. You may not understand this yet, you almost certainly will not accept it, but you have nevertheless witnessed it, and soooner or later, you will eventually grasp what you were seeing.

There is a reason the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution for their posterity, and for their posterity alone. There is a reason they limited naturalization to whites. There is a reason they enacted the Chinese exclusion act. Americans foolishly abandoned the wisdom of their forefathers for a self-serving myth concocted by immigrants in the name of anti-racism, and they will experience the inevitable consequences of that foolishness.

Nothing good has come of this. And worse is yet to come. But none of this means that the American nation cannot rise again, if the surviving posterity returns to the principles that made America great in the first place.

Recant your absurd equalitarianism. Give up those ridiculous myths that enchain your mind. Embrace your American identity and stop thinking that because a member of a competing identity is nice, or polite, or smiled at you, that their interests are not diametrically opposed to you and your people. The survival of America, and possibly Western Civilization, depends upon it.

The map is not the territory. The state is not the nation. The citizen is not the national. The metaphor is not the material.

And yet, the notion that the U.S. was to be exclusively for whites of English decent shows up no where in the constitution. The founders didn't include it.

It shows up in the Preamble, you ignorant, Soros-funded idiot. That is the very purpose of the Constitution, and it was supported by the Naturalization Act passed by Congress and signed by George Washington the very next year.

In all of the naturalization acts from 1790 to 1906 the privilege of naturalization was confined to white persons [260 U.S. 178, 193], although the exact wording of the various statutes was not always the same. If Congress in 1906 desired to alter a rule so well and so long established it may be assumed that its purpose would have been definitely disclosed and its legislation to that end put in unmistakable terms.- TAKAO OZAWA v. United States, 1922

I need to read the book. I'm currently reading SJWs Always Lie and just finished The Irrational Atheist. I love them both. Of course, I'm skeptical that if your interpretation of the Constitution's founding is correct then why were even non-British citizens allowed?

Another thing dawns on me here (again, this may be covered in your book). Mexican/Central American's are ultimately of European descent. Where does that leave the state of Spanish and Portuguese Europeans? Italians? Why wouldn't whatever reasoning applied to them also apply to Mexican and Central American immigrants?

I don't think they meant "posterity" in the Abrahamic sense, but in the generational sense. Also, give the real significance of the idea that America was for whites only, you would think it would have been added to the text of the constitution. But it wasn't.

The first congress also enacted the Whiskey Tax. Based on your reading of the meaning of the actions of the first congress you'd also have to conclude that the founding generation believed it was fundamental to tax whiskey, but not cider.

Islam is not a race nor ethnicity but it's deadly because it shackles the mind into stupid version of deity.

Christianity/ the real honest to God missionaries could work with voodoo, witch doctors, dumb people and get them good at a lot of things.

The point is social capital rides on social cohesion. A workforce of 20,000 dullards can be directed by one visionary and come up with the Great Pyramid, ie. break all records forever. Dwell on this for 50 seconds.

A small group of "white/ right" farmers could turn Rhodesia into the African bread basket. Think about that for 50 seconds.

Ethnicity, and any asymmetrical distribution of talents is not as big a deal as the wrong version of God. The wrong version of equality.

Trump may or not be able to fix things, but at least for a while he will be a wrecking ball for a while. If that incredibly terrible candidate Hillary can get in traditional Americana is finished. It may be anyway.

The thing about these non assimilating immigrants is that it is a bad business no matter what they are like. At the least it will be the balkanization of politics to the benefit of the corrupt. Meanwhile they do bring problems. The Mexicans are lightly educated and not getting more heavily educated, producing a permanent lower class. And then their the so called refugees that bring in Islam. Wow! do we have to be out of our minds to let them in, let alone fund it.

Because "Hispanics" are Injun-Iberian rapebabies. Iberians don't have a goddamned thing in common with Aztecs. Genetic espanoles and portugues (including those that may be Mexican or Cuban nationals) should just abandon the word Hispanic to the mongrel hordes at this point.

People less than 75% European shouldn't fall under the white umbrella, which would disqualify the majority of every country south of the border save Argentina, which is overwhelmingly Italian, Spanish, and English.

At the time of the formation of the United States the workable problem, the one that could be solved, was getting the different European nationalities to get along. The real reason for freedom of religion was to try to keep away from religious wars breaking out between the different Christian sects.

The whole social agenda thing got written up in the form of asserted universal virtues because grand statements sell well. The simple and the grand are easier to put over than the particular and the limited.

And now in our current period we are implementing the universals as literal truths. What it amounts to is a massive cultural experiment in which there are lots and lots of reasons for thinking it will not turn out well. And if it does not turn out there is no backing out. We will all end up living with a debased social system. Demographics are all but impossible to change.

I'm skeptical that if your interpretation of the Constitution's founding is correct then why were even non-British citizens allowed?

Because they were already here. There was plenty of land and the since the Founders were restricting naturalization, they assumed that the relatively small minority of non-English Americans would gradually be absorbed.

They actually wrote about this stuff, you know. You don't have to concoct bizarre theories in your head, you can simply read what they wrote.

I don't think they meant "posterity" in the Abrahamic sense, but in the generational sense. Also, give the real significance of the idea that America was for whites only, you would think it would have been added to the text of the constitution.

You're absolutely and utterly wrong. It is clearly phrased "to ourselves and our Posterity". That means their children and their children's children, not invaders from foreign lands. And they obviously believed a law was sufficient, because at the time, people couldn't simply fly in from Africa and Asia.

Of course, even if they had made it perfectly clear in the Constitution that Americans were to be white, English, and Christian, some court would have invented emanations and penumbras to claim otherwise.

He presents a blistering case for the Anglo-Saxon nucleus so vital to the US with his particular literary flavour:

"Most dangerous and fallacious of the several misconceptions of Americanism is that of the so-called “melting-pot” of races and traditions. It is true that this country has received a vast influx of non-English immigrants who come hither to enjoy without hardship the liberties which our British ancestors carved out in toil and bloodshed. "

...and capped off with this gem, which reads with unsettling familiarity:

"Our age is one of restless and unintelligent iconoclasm, and abounds with shrewd sophists who use the name “Americanism” to cover attacks on that institution itself. Such familiar terms and phrases as “democracy,” “liberty,” or “freedom of speech” are being distorted to cover the wildest forms of anarchy, whilst our old representative institutions are being attacked as “un-American” by foreign immigrants who are incapable both of understanding them or of devising anything better."

Well, if the American nation rises again, it will be historically unique and again earn the nation the title of exceptional. A majority of the under five demographic is now non-white and many of the whites are foreigners like Henry Briggs. I suppose if you include blacks and Indians, then the various native ethnic groups still constitute a majority. At this point, I don't know what can be done other than to revere Trump, expel the barbarian and his sympathizers and hope for the best. 100M+ would need to be removed to have the Japanese levels of homogeneity and cohesion that I and other nationalists want.

All you need is a pyramid project. It is both a metaphor and legacy. Vox is entirely right about property rights and inheritance.Having sold their birth rights however what can be done about it? Weep? Nash teeth?The gospel works because it's true. "In God We Trust". Three of those words need expansion. God, which One? "We" - who is "we" this week? Them enforce it. Trust? What works of God are now considered trustworthy? Ascend to our approval? If we are trusting in Him, what did He do to warrant it? I say this not to be ironic. Specify three words and your nation is restored. It's the most ubiquitous social contract on the table. Seize it.

Which is why I expect the bloodshed will be historically epic. At this point, partition is probably the best shot.

The Obama Administration apparently agrees and wants to take partition off the table. The federal intervention into state and local racial housing patterns is one of the most radical communist projects ever undertaken to commit white genocide. Hillary Clinton is fully supportive of it.

The Left is stupidly creating hate where no hate needs to be created, but they have the minds of basically a very emotionally damaged and petty woman. The Left could use the old joke line "They come in peace" and leave it at that, but no, they have to be anti-white and dare call it "anti-racism." They are in effect marginalizing their allies the Cuckservatives who frankly their virtue signaling is become joke, and if you joke about something its authority is diminished.

Case in point about people and magic dirt. The Wandering of Nations was not the moving of dirt around Europe, it was the movement of groups of generally heterogeneous people. At no point after their entrance into the Roman Empire were they considered Romans or even Gauls, Iberians, Illyrians, etc.

@6 Why on Earth do you have any reason to assume the interpretation that requires the most mental gymnastics to be true? The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers, containing arguments regarding what the Constitution should contain make no obscure or vague, malleable references to their positions. They are very straight forward in their assertions. Only those who seek to undermine or destroy civilization (in order to save it), the authoritarians seeking to enslave all others, torture the language in such ways.

Partition seems most likely. Migration patterns have to some extent concentrated ethnic groups in different areas. There is plenty on historical precedent for either balkanization or mongrelization and decay. I am not aware of any case where a nation as demographically gutted as the US has been ethnically cleansed and maintained its existing borders.

As for those who bash the Millennials, yes you make good points about them and their public image.

But I have evidence anecdotal to be sure but it is contrary to what the old folks think. I was at a millennial wedding recently and it should knowing the careers and make up of the young have been a diversity fest blessed by the presence of the glorious noble people of color, two whole middle aged blacks were in attendance, otherwise Whitopia, smart, very attractive, fairly ambitious with plenty of artists without any crappy virtue signaling habits.

100M+ would need to be removed to have the Japanese levels of homogeneity and cohesion that I and other nationalists want.

Perhaps we should ask the jewish (((bolshiviks))) what they told Moa to help him kill 100 million of his own people. Would the sell us the rope?

It shows up in the Preamble, you ignorant, Soros-funded idiot.

This is why liberals try to change language, also that people can't read how the elites were defeated in the past.

don't think they meant "posterity" in the Abrahamic sense, but in the generational sense.

While you might count someone like Shitavious Cook as your posterity, 3rd world moslems would definitely not be counted by the founding Fathers. The main reason for finding America(searching for a new way to India) was to avoid traveling through moslem lands. Thomas Jefferson was a moslem realist when he created the marines.

people couldn't simply fly in from Africa and Asia.

Its US taxpayer dollars that fly 3rd world refusegees from Africa to the US. See Refugee Resettlement Watch.

While I agree in general, here's the problem: who burned Atlanta, Columbia and Savannah to the ground? Who encouraged blacks to migrate to Catholic run cities like Detroit and Chicago (see E Michael Jones "The Slaughter of Cities")?

Yankees detest other whites, even their Anglo cousins. We're screwed if they are in charge, and they will morph into southerners (Bush), blacks (Obama) or Mormons (Romney) if it means retaining power over other whites. And, of course, they have no qualms about aligning with Jewish interest to maintain control of fellow whites.

Because they were already here. There was plenty of land and the since the Founders were restricting naturalization, they assumed that the relatively small minority of non-English Americans would gradually be absorbed.

They actually wrote about this stuff, you know. You don't have to concoct bizarre theories in your head, you can simply read what they wrote.

Not theories, just some questions born of admitted ignorance. Like I said, I plan on reading your book on the subject next. Thanks for responding though.

Here's something that struck me "It's all but impossible for the younger generation to realize what they have lost, or more precisely, of what they have been robbed" which reads like something you could make a business out of, informing the younger generation of their losses and then offering a way to claw out of that situation. Most likely it is because this is something that I've been looking to figure out how to set out as a business plan.

Mail me if this is more than a throwaway line to you and you would like to work on it.

@6. "The first congress also enacted the Whiskey Tax. Based on your reading of the meaning of the actions of the first congress you'd also have to conclude that the founding generation believed it was fundamental to tax whiskey, but not cider."

How obtuse. The early Congresses enacted several alternative means of raising revenue - excise taxes, tariffs of varying amounts. The taxes, their duration, and their amounts, varied from administration to administration. What did not change whatsoever, throughout the entire generation of the Founders and for several generations after, was limiting naturalization to whites.

A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to visit my childhood neighborhood in Chicago after a 20+ year absence. 30 years ago it was 99% white and today it is 99% Hispanic. What was once a safe neighborhood filled with well maintained bungalows now is a slum. The houses have deteriorated, the lawns aren't cut, and there were tires, garbage, and couches on the front lawns. Looking at the sorry shape of the house my great grandparents built in the early 20th century was depressing.

I drove back home feeling enraged at the people who made this happen. They not only brought these people to our country but then used the tax dollars of hard working people to create programs that effectively gave them our neighborhoods.

"It's all but impossible for the younger generation to realize what they have lost, or more precisely, of what they have been robbed."

The Milenials Remember. Oh trust me, those of my cohort of the Millenials, born in the early 80s know precisely what we lost. We remember what life was like in our youth in the late 80s and in our teens in the 90s, then all the sudden we graduated, and it wasn't anymore. Yet our parent's generation insisted the same rules applied, even though just securing employment wasn't even a given within a year of leaving school, or that the employment would even be enough to pay the basic bills. So while those in the generation before (minus the youngest cohort of Xers, maybe. They still enjoyed the late 90s boom at least before the ensuing downward trend) had a life where you could go and do something productive in society and make a living, after the early-mid 2000s, it just wasn't anymore. Sure, I know, INB4 'Whiny MIllenials sucks", just saying, in the context of this article, we aren't unaware of the change. In fact we're more aware than the Boomers especially, who just ignore the change, and the Xers who mostly don't seem to realize just how bad things sucks.

I wonder if it's some Puritan/Quaker leftover. I've never known a group as as bitter and self-hating as the Quakers. I've known a lot of Quakers, and they almost all have an intense hatred of all things Anglo-Saxon. (In addition to being nasty, passive-aggressive, and off-the-deep-end leftist, especially since the ANSWER days in 2001-2003.)

@7 "One thing I've noticed. The invaders don't seem to eager to settle in Appalachia, or Detroit these days for that matter."

Have a coworker whose husband is from the Balkans, and they moved to Detroit when they came to this country. Was talking to a Cousin(?) of his at a get together and he remarked that when he first saw detroit he actually thought about going back. It was an interesting discussion, though both he and my coworkers husband seemed completely poisoned by Semi Socialist Eastern European Politics. We ended up talking about Trump. Of course he was totally against him, but wouldn't come close to admitting it was because he thinks immigrants have a right to seek their better life where they choose, whether that country wants it or not.

Bobby Farr wrote:Partition seems most likely. Migration patterns have to some extent concentrated ethnic groups in different areas. There is plenty on historical precedent for either balkanization or mongrelization and decay. I am not aware of any case where a nation as demographically gutted as the US has been ethnically cleansed and maintained its existing borders.

The problem is how are we going to partition? The government has accelerated plans to try and even out repopulate every town in the US with minorities. Most Americans are not going to actively resist this until it is already done. At that point violence is the only thing that can happen.

" But none of this means that the American nation cannot rise again, ..."

I read Tolkein as a boy and assumed it was a World War 2 story with orcs. It was only much later that I found out that he explicitly denied this, leaving me wondering what was it about then. Eventually I realized he was writing about civilizational struggle. It is through that lens that we can see Tolkein's Denethor Lesson: never give up hope.

And I think people are overgeneralizing when they say the Northeastern and other non-Southern whites are somehow inherently anti-American and anti-nationalism. This is true of the NE as a whole since it was the first area to be destroyed demographically and in many areas of the NE and SW whites are almost non-existent. Still, whites throughout the USA have a long history of resisting the immigrant hordes - the Know Nothing movement, the 1924 Immigration Act, the Chinese Exclusion Act. The South is relatively new to the party.

As the culture shifts and brings the political discussion further to the right, many of these whites will be brought along, particularly if Trump can re-empower them politically through closed borders, deportations and alliance with the foreign whites who are numerous in the NE.

"100M+ would need to be removed to have the Japanese levels of homogeneity and cohesion that I and other nationalists want.

Which is why I expect the bloodshed will be historically epic. At this point, partition is probably the best shot."

It's like this: Someone hands you a wad of cash. You spend it. Get shit. But nothing new has been produced. You just walked around town and everyone gives you all their shit 'cuz you have some green paper. Now the town is poor as fuck and you've got it all.

That's what happens when you print money.

This is going to be remembered as the Great Confiscation.

America will have nothing. Realize the dollar is worthless, and the entire continent, with the exception of Mexico, will turn into Somalia. Europe probably too. Europe's been doin' the same money printin' we 'ave.

It will be like the fall of the Soviet Union, the 1990's in Russia, but instead of Chechens, we have Blacks and Arabs.

All that chaos should turn back on the K-selection. And 'cuz tribalism should save the West. Nationalists don't give a fuck 'bout handguns and molotov cocktails.

Germany lost what, 10% of its adult male pop. in WW2? Ancient Rome lost 30% of its adult male pop. at the battle of Cannae.

That will be remembered as the Great Chaos, which will proceed to Great Confiscation.

@5 They're foreigners. A Spaniard isn't a German, isn't a Scot, isn't an American. American is an ethnic identification not some vague racial category inhabited by all whites. Your question is the equivalent of asking "What about Italians? Are they Germans?"

As a 1964 model year, I can tell you the boomers are very much aware of your plight and very sympathetic. That is because late GenX / Millennials are their children, and what parent does not want good things for their kids?

Fact is many of the engineers I work with in the 64~65 age range are continuing to work past when they expected to retire to put away money for their kids. Now I hear folks say they should step aside for the kids, but the fact is when an old anglo retires they replace them with a H1B visa in my industry. Most of the Engineers I work with have suggested their kids pursue other industries because of that. The Boomers know their kids have been screwed, but they do not know what they can do about it.

As for the younger chaps in the 1965 to 1982 birth range, I note the are doing the same trying to do what they can to mitigate the bad situation their kids are likely to face. The smart ones are living well below their means, preparing for bad times.

As much as I wish Vox was wrong, it seems like the general mood is one of a disaster waiting in the wings. Reminds me of the writings of how Germans felt in 1944, knowing disaster was on its way, hoping it would be averted somehow and yet powerless to do anything to prevent it.

You may not understand this yet, you almost certainly will not accept it, but you have nevertheless witnessed it, and soooner or later, you will eventually grasp what you were seeing.

This is why I say the Alt Right is the set of ideas easy to understand but hard to accept. Liberals are stupid and don't understand. Cucks understand, but refuse to accept. So in practice, they follow the same policies, just with Cucks making some ineffectual noises now and then about secondary issues.

The good and bad news is that regardless of whether you understand or accept reality, it still smacks you in the face. So at some point, the problem will be too big for liberals or cucks to ignore, at which point they'll either join the Alt Right or just give up. They won't fight for the Propositional Nation - it'll just be the various invader streams we have to deal with.

Nothing will be easy or guaranteed, but historically, that is a battle we've won when we decided to fight it.

"... the great waves of past immigration to whom the adulteration and ideological misdirecting of the nation can be directly traced, the Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians ... "

Don't be an ass. Germans, Irish, and especially Italians, played virtually no role in the ideological misdirection of the last 50 years. Who do you think was more representative of the Irish, Joe McCarthy or Ted Kennedy?

So.... If I identify as a white American (what with being white, and American, and having had no immigrants in the last 4 generations) but have some white ancestors who were part of "the great waves of past immigration to whom the adulteration and ideological misdirecting of the nation can be directly traced, the Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians," am I American enough to be part of this nationalist movement?

Mexican/Central American's are ultimately of European descent. Where does that leave the state of Spanish and Portuguese Europeans? Italians? Why wouldn't whatever reasoning applied to them also apply to Mexican and Central American immigrants?

"With mixed race, it's been seen that they average in between As Brazilians and Mestizos can attest!"

The proliferation of statute law during the last 100 years, exponentially rising in the last 50, is a direct result of trying to maintain order when ever more people lacking a basic set of common behaviors are mixed.

When essentially everyone believes in the same behavioral norms, most laws are redundant and window dressing. When large subpopulations simply don't observe shared norms, laws attempting to compel commonality fail spectacularly. This is the basic failing of libertarian political philosophy.

Partition & exile are the only means of creating places where a common people get what they earn. The current system purports to offer Western Civilization's golden eggs to peoples who obviously cannot make them, and in the process this system is strangling the Western Civ (mostly men) geese who exclusively produce what everyone else wants (or takes for granted.)

And the lower-class trend towards the native and the upper-class towards the European. And the lower-class are who are pouring over the border, not the upper-class.

Yep, and if it was the upper-class Ricardo Montalbans migrating, it wouldn't be such a problem. And I think it was Lee Trevino who, after he made a boatload of money as a professional golfer, said "Now I'm rich enough to be Spanish instead of Mexican."

The smart ones are living well below their means, preparing for bad times.

You nailed it.

But kids raised to adulthood in the last 30 years have never experienced deprivation. Their entire lives have been spent surrounded by a seemingly endless cornucopia of prosperity.

I can explain 20 hours a day why this paradigm is false, and why it's essential to prepare for difficulty, but the over-the-top success of my kids actually is a handicap.

It doesn't help that I've been warning of apocalypse since 1995. Mr. Market has done an astonishing job creating an historic level of complacency among people, the single most essential precondition for a once-in-several-centuries economic & social cataclysm.

Don't be an ass. Germans, Irish, and especially Italians, played virtually no role in the ideological misdirection of the last 50 years. Who do you think was more representative of the Irish, Joe McCarthy or Ted Kennedy?

I'd have given you the benefit of the doubt, but since you're determined to be obnoxious, I'll just inform you that you're both ignorant and stupid. Every major immigrant group moved the country significantly to the Left and away from the Constitution. None of them supported small government or understand the first thing about the U.S. Constitution.

If I identify as a white American (what with being white, and American, and having had no immigrants in the last 4 generations) but have some white ancestors who were part of "the great waves of past immigration to whom the adulteration and ideological misdirecting of the nation can be directly traced, the Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians," am I American enough to be part of this nationalist movement?

I would assume so, but it's not up to me. The key is the personal identification with white America and nothing else.

Trapped in memories and increasing isolation, they have no idea what the USA has become. It's all but impossible for the younger generation to realize what they have lost, or more precisely, of what they have been robbed.

THIS! My grandparents (both pushing 90) are life long democrats and simply do not have the bandwidth to see what's happened. My students have no idea what limited government means - they seem incapable. Millennials are zoo animals.

I don't think they meant "posterity" in the Abrahamic sense, but in the generational sense. Also, give the real significance of the idea that America was for whites only, you would think it would have been added to the text of the constitution. But it wasn't.

The first congress also enacted the Whiskey Tax. Based on your reading of the meaning of the actions of the first congress you'd also have to conclude that the founding generation believed it was fundamental to tax whiskey, but not cider.

**It's all but impossible for the younger generation to realize what they have lost,**

I try to explain it to my kids but they have no point of reference or think I am just getting old and in typical old person fashion remember the past rosier than it was.

I asked them the other day if they could even imagine a life where they didn't lock doors to their house or cars. They couldn't. I told them was precisely how it was when I was growing up and I lived in a lower middle class area ---we never, ever locked anything and we were never robbed, had things stolen, etc.

Seeing those pictures of Brazil from the olympics is like a glimpse into our future. Next house I purchase, if (big if) it is in the United States, I will probably go gated---and I don't think we are far from security details and barbed wire like South Africans live.

St. Cecilia wrote:Who do you think was more representative of the Irish, Joe McCarthy or Ted Kennedy?Quite demonstrably the Irish of the Silent Generation were the Joe McCarthy types. The Irish of the Boomer generation are the Ted Kennedy supporters. I got to see this play out in my own family. My grandparents (on my mother's side) were big time Ethnic Democrats. My grandfather was an elected official. My parents were Labor Democrats, of the type that refused to vote for McGovern. My older brothers and sisters are socialist Democrats, and pretty damn angry about it. My next older brother (b 1957, retired Army) and my younger brother (b 1961) and I (b 1959) are all conservative to varying degrees. We three youngest came of age during the Watergate/Carter era.

Bobby Farr wrote:A majority of the under five demographic is now non-whiteEvery last child of illegal immigrants is potentially deportable along with its parents. A very large fraction of the rest of the immigrant-descended part can be persuaded to leave by removing incentives like welfare and affirmative action. Last, Depo-Provera in the ghetto would slash the birth rate there.

100M+ would need to be removed to have the Japanese levels of homogeneityWe could do 40 million in 4 years and the rest over time. Just giving Black felons and their families incentives to re-colonize to Liberia would re-humanize lots of cities.

Phillip George wrote:All you need is a pyramid project. It is both a metaphor and legacy.We had one. It was called Apollo. We sacrificed it for the gibs that Ralph Abernathy demanded.

We could have been on Mars if it wasn't for da turrible, turrible legacy ob da slabery. Or if we'd kept Jim Crow and literacy tests for voting.

Robert Divinity wrote:The Obama Administration apparently agrees and wants to take partition off the table. The federal intervention into state and local racial housing patterns is one of the most radical communist projects ever undertaken to commit white genocide.Distributing the NAM underclass into small, indefensible areas among a fed-up population that's armed to the teeth just makes them quicker to get rid of.

The problem is the aftermath. The (((intelligentsia))) must be removed with extreme prejudice, not allowed to write the histories, or White guilt will be used to re-start their genocide project.

I may be in a pocket, but the over 50% bell curve millennials I know do not seem to be zoo animals. They seem to be rather out of sorts with the lack of opportunities and have a realist view of their opportunities or lack thereof. A kind of malaise.

To the degree that a lot of them seem to focus on short term enjoyment, it is rational if they do not see a path forward, as folks of the 1970s through the 1990s saw. Deferred pleasure is only rational if the chance of success is in your favor. There were career opportunities for college and tech school grad pre 2000, heck it seems pretty good for a lot of those years.

It is similar to something I saw in the 1980s, when the kids of the blue collar folks, who fathers had good well paid jobs in factories, realized those jobs were not there for them. A small percentage of these men became small business men, but the vast majority, not having the brain power to do high tech were floundering. Now with H1B visas and lack of a growing economy there is not much of a path to prosperity for the young STEM grads, or so it appears now.

@34, I went back to my home town in Oklahoma City several years ago. My aunt had convinced my grandmother to move because the neighborhood had changed. It was a blue collar neighborhood, so I thought this was a code word for blacks moving in. Imagine my surprise to find the problem was "white trash". Lots of little kids playing in the sprinklers in the front yard. Looked about like what you'd expect with a bunch of hillbillies living there. Of course, I have a memory of the neighbor across the street pitching the husband's clothes out in the front yard every Friday night. At least it seemed to still be a pretty safe neighborhood.

@85 Your discussion of pure breds vs. mutts is entirely irrelevant. No one says that the English do not exist as a distinct ethnic group simply because they were formed from the mingling of different tribes.

Everyone is familiar with many instances of ethnic cleansing so your discussion of Indians is also irrelevant. It would be a relevant example if the Indians had succeeded in kicking the whites out of the USA.

Fact is many of the engineers I work with in the 64~65 age range are continuing to work past when they expected to retire to put away money for their kids.

As for the younger chaps in the 1965 to 1982 birth range, I note the are doing the same trying to do what they can to mitigate the bad situation their kids are likely to face.

This. Exactly this. 37y.o. engineer turned plant manager. My entire investment/savings strategy revolves around providing for my kids because I know they will have nothing but what I can provide for them - and then again, that's only if it doesn't get taken away. If things work out according to the timetable I've set up, if I kick the bucket around 80 each one of my kids will inherit a dwelling paid-in-full and a small pile of money. Of course if I die sooner they pile is bigger... either way I know everyone else in this entire world has been stealing from them since before they were born, so somebody needs to provide for them.

**Letting white areas see real non Asian minorities will prevent them from believing what is seen on TV.**

They aren't going to be shielded from it soon.

I live in a mostly white Mormon suburban area of Phoenix where there are 4-5 toe heads to a family. IOW, very normal.

When I venture out of this little bubble--holy sh*t--it's 3rd world city everywhere. I was in Target the other Saturday afternoon, not far from here--still affluent zip code--I am not lying when I tell you me and one guy about the age of 60 years old were the only two white people in the entire store.

It was roving packs of 4 or more third worlders from every corner of the globe or American blacks. I was a stranger in a strange land.

About once a week I go to a luncheon with friends and the talk has been turning to "how diverse" their neighborhoods are getting with a fair degree of alarm. About then is when I like to bring up the white SA squatter camps. (:

"It's hard for the older generation to realize things are as bad as they are. Trapped in memories and increasing isolation, they have no idea what the USA has become. It's all but impossible for the younger generation to realize what they have lost, or more precisely, of what they have been robbed...."

What the millenials in this thread see is the lost economic opportunity. Yes that is bad but the other things that have been lost, the mostly intangible things, those loses are the hardest to communicate and the most crucial for a full understanding of just how, and how much, our culture has been damaged.

You can relate some anecdotes of life as it was but those have a hard time transferring the spirit of those times in a way someone could fully grok.

This is something I've had on my mind for some time but until now didn't see the explicit need for GenX or older folks to communicate it so younger folks could begin to understand what and how much has been lost and why it is important for them to understand.

It's more than going from a high trust to a low trust society.

To be able to articulate these things at all is a blessing and Vox has been done yeoman's work providing us with many tools for discernment and rhetorical warfare. I will be ever grateful for it.

Hey Vox, thanks for posting my review! I really loved your book so I'm glad you liked my review. I meant what I wrote. I'm actually half Honduran and half European but Obama's half black and not never stopped the leftists from calling him black. I've been reading your fascinating blog lately since I saw you on Freedomain Radio and I'm just wondering how and when an American Party would replace the Republican Party? I completely agree that the GOP is made up of cowardly cucks whose biggest fear is that they'll be called racist or that they won't get invited the best Georgetown parties. So, where will the politicians of the American Party come from? After all, they'll have to live in the cesspool that is Washington DC and the social pressure to be transracial and transnational is so overwhelming in DC. Also, as you know, there are few people as brave as you and Trump who are willing to talk about race and nationalism in the same sentence, so where will all these courageous people come from? Are you assuming that the narrative will swing so wildly in favor of Western Civilizationists that politicians won't be afraid to run on that type of platform? If so, when do you think that swing in the narrative will happen?

@6 "Also, given the real significance of the idea that America was for whites only, you would think it would have been added to the text of the constitution. But it wasn't."

No of course it wasn't - no more than they included that "Americans should wear clothing in public." It was SO evident, prima facie, that this was to be a country for the *White* founders and their posterity, their offspring into the future, that to point it out would have been idiotic!

If you want to even further back: Would Paul have had ANY need to admonish women to be silent in church, if the women were ALREADY silent in church? Or would he had added it to STOP what was occurring.

Hence the early legislation: "of course" they meant WHITE men of good character. They didn't spell it out because it hadn't occurred to them that they needed to!

Just that one part is pretty astounding, though. A retiree in his mid 70's was talking the other day about air travel. He recalled going on an airliner one time in the 1960's; he had a ticket, he walked out on to the tarmac, and got on the plane. Like getting on a bus. Now he refuses to fly unless he has to go somewhere more than 1,000 miles and doesn't have time to drive. Not just because TSA is what it is, but he remembers what it was like before and it really makes him angry. Because it didn't used to be like that, and he's convinced it doesn't have to be like that even now.

As a fellow Bean-Kin I really get what the author of that review was trying to get after. In particular is the idea that somewhere in Hispanic society, is a vibrant culture or belief in conservatism

I always hear about the "natural conservatism" of Hispanics and Latinos, but in practice, I've never really seen it aside from a couple. Certainly, the majority are leftists.

I'm a younger man, soon to be 25, when I was out of high school and up until about two or three years ago I was always floating between some odd anti-capitalist thought (thanks, public school), or libertarianism (thanks, based history teacher). I think the latter is mostly because I grew up in a very small town very very far away from anywhere other Hispanics lived.

The moment I met my extended "family" on my father's side - in Texas, where they are from - I soon understood just what kind of people they were, the criminality, deceit, and other failures that kept multiple generations of my father's family (both grandfather and grandmother's) in the same small Texas town where they had been since before the Texas Revolution, and where they would stay in perpetuity. They all lived off the dole, all hated "gabachos" and "gringos" (being half Irish didn't make my time there easier). I realized that if I had lived in this small town, I too would have made the great escape as soon as I could have if I was even remotely like myself. If I had gotten on the dole and knocked up some sow at 17 or 18 like many of my relatives had, and hated all those who are outside my little petty kingdom; I would be all behind the parties that not only want to pay me for being a societal leech, but also want to bring more leeches into the country.

The only conservatives in my family that I know are my grandfather, and two of my uncles who all had served in the US Military for a period of time. More often than not, most Hispanics I know who are right-of-center almost always were either military, or they lived somewhere far from other Hispanics.

The worst part about all of that time in Texas was that - as I mentioned before - since I am half Irish, I was shunned by most of my (especially younger) relatives. I also didn't speak Spanish, which brought more scorn. Funnily enough, I do speak or read other languages, it's just that it's Japanese, Latin, with some Norwegian and German. It's clear that they don't want people like me, with an 149 IQ and multi-lingual to be associated with them, even by blood. I guess my success reminds them of their own failure. Even the basest animal knows when it is caged, just as even the dumbest of my family knows they are slaves to the dole.

Honestly, I think I was proud when they told me I wasn't a "real Hispanic" near the end of my visit. I knew then that I was truly an American.

Just that one part is pretty astounding, though. A retiree in his mid 70's was talking the other day about air travel. He recalled going on an airliner one time in the 1960's; he had a ticket, he walked out on to the tarmac, and got on the plane. Like getting on a bus. Now he refuses to fly unless he has to go somewhere more than 1,000 miles and doesn't have time to drive. Not just because TSA is what it is, but he remembers what it was like before and it really makes him angry. Because it didn't used to be like that, and he's convinced it doesn't have to be like that even now.

I flew a lot before 911 (actually, about the time I discovered this blog). I don't do so now. I used to go to larger cities for fun, I don't now. Chicago is went to an armed camp to Berlin 1945. I worked in an area 14 years ago that the cops have pulled out of. My old plant is still there, but they have fortified the grounds.

Sam the Man wrote:I may be in a pocket, but the over 50% bell curve millennials I know do not seem to be zoo animals. They seem to be rather out of sorts with the lack of opportunities and have a realist view of their opportunities or lack thereof. A kind of malaise.

To the degree that a lot of them seem to focus on short term enjoyment, it is rational if they do not see a path forward, as folks of the 1970s through the 1990s saw. Deferred pleasure is only rational if the chance of success is in your favor. There were career opportunities for college and tech school grad pre 2000, heck it seems pretty good for a lot of those years.

It is similar to something I saw in the 1980s, when the kids of the blue collar folks, who fathers had good well paid jobs in factories, realized those jobs were not there for them. A small percentage of these men became small business men, but the vast majority, not having the brain power to do high tech were floundering. Now with H1B visas and lack of a growing economy there is not much of a path to prosperity for the young STEM grads, or so it appears now. I am a National Merit Scholar. I have had many people in the university system tell me that I was to "normative" to get that honor today. In my last job, we hired a NMS. She was so, well, dumb, that I called my old school and asked for her transcript. But she was the right gender and race.

The Founding Fathers, in their infinite wisdom, enabled Congress, via the voting populace, to determine the standards for citizenship and the criteria as to what constitutes an American. At that time, it was whites, which is not surprising given the context. However, they enabled future generations to make that determination. The Supreme Court agreed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, where a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen. That's how it has been and always will be.

The Founding Fathers, in their infinite wisdom, enabled Congress, via the voting populace, to determine the standards for citizenship and the criteria as to what constitutes an American. At that time, it was whites, which is not surprising given the context. However, they enabled future generations to make that determination. The Supreme Court agreed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, where a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen. That's how it has been and always will be.

Rhetoric Man August 02, 2016 9:49 PM The Founding Fathers, in their infinite wisdom, enabled Congress, via the voting populace, to determine the standards for citizenship and the criteria as to what constitutes an American. At that time, it was whites, which is not surprising given the context. However, they enabled future generations to make that determination.

why do you keep posting this again and again. I think its 3x in the last month at least

"It's hard for the older generation to realize things are as bad as they are." Geez Vox, you don't often preach to the choir. You informed Vox readers of this 4 years ago. Us old farts as non readers probably knew it 10 years ago. Do try to keep up. ;-)

Dunno how many Irishmen you've met over in Italy, but this Irishman can tell you that very few Irish I know (and I know plenty) love gun control. Mostly it's older ladies of a previous generation, who mistakenly conflate guns not with crime but with war. The men I know are overwhelmingly pro-gun.

The only problem is that very few of them understand that the real purpose of 2A is to defend yourself not from crime, but from an overly intrusive gubmint.

I grew up in Northern New England in the 60s and 70s. We never locked our doors or our cars. Now you can't, except perhaps in the smaller towns.

I have lived in Tokyo for 15 years. When I first got here if you lost your wallet, you certainly got it back. Now with large numbers of Chinese whom someJapanese despise and third world immigrants you can kiss your wallet good-bye and you have to lock your doors.

The fact that you won't remove this and the people you attract to your blog only show what kind of person you are. Stay in Europe! I'd rather live in a 3rd World country than with people like you and your supporters.

to whom the adulteration and ideological misdirecting of the nation can be directly traced, the Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the Scandinavians, and the Jews,

No. It can be traced to the Jewish ownership of the media. No White group ever wanted non-White mass immigration. Possibly with the exception of the Irish, seeing as Irish faces have been fronting for Jewish publications for a long time in the past.

So the Britons would be the only innocent ones? And Slavs? Slavs vote for socialist mass-immigration parties in every Western country they enter. They are loyal allies of the Left, as they want the welfare, the money flowing to their own countries, and an open door for their countrymen. Britons? The English leadership cared about money, not race. As American Renaissance has shown, nowhere in the Empire were local administrators allowed to keep out non-Whites. Australian officials had to come up with convoluted language requirements to stop the Indian flood. Indians settled in South Africa - where the English had attacked the Boers, who were far more racialist, and filled the land with Blacks migrating from the north. The English elite in the U.S. didn't put any racial requirements in the Constitution, considering the Jews to be "God's chosen people". They had control, and they let Jews take large parts of financial banking, and then take control of the media. They teamed up with the Jews to destroy the German insurrection against Jewish Marxism, killing millions of Germans.

But I suppose all this is inconvenient information when one has made up one's mind.

crand, what happened? You loved the book, and your first post in this thread was gushy. Your very next post, you're furious, you've deleted the review, you want your words taken back, you want nothing to do with Vox. What changed between the first post and the subsequent three?