Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Obama biographer David Maraniss wrote an 1139-word article,
“The Audacity of Doubt,” for The Washington Post on Sunday that
purported to be a refutation of what some critics have been saying about
the President. Maraniss focuses mostly on questions about Obama’s
religion and place of birth and pretends to have the answers.

However, Maraniss ignored the fact that the critics were right four
years ago when they identified communist Frank Marshall Davis as Obama’s
mentor in Hawaii and the mysterious “Frank” from Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father.

Maraniss had written a 10,000-word piece for the Post in 2008, when
the information could have made a difference in the campaign, ignoring
this critical fact. He told me in an email that he had ignored Davis
because he had somehow concluded that Davis didn’t have much of an
impact on Obama.

Not content to slink away with egg on his face for ignoring the story
of the century, Maraniss spent years working on a book about Obama,
thinking the public would regard it as definitive. He is suffering under
a delusion.

Since Maraniss wants us to believe he dwells on “facts,” here are
some inconvenient facts about Davis before we get into the tawdry and
highly personal side of the Obama-Davis relationship:

America, it's time to meet your newest top-secret government employee: a professional cover-up artist with a radical agenda.

Graham Spanier is the former Penn State University
president who was fired during the Jerry Sandusky investigation for
failing to properly investigate Sandusky when the pedophilia allegations
first surfaced.

Spanier's "investigation" of Jerry Sandusky was so thoroughly inept that it got him fired. When it was completed, Spanier stated
that he had "complete confidence in how they have handled the
allegations against Sandusky," and he was fired very shortly
thereafter. The recent Freeh report indicates that the investigation
was conducted for the purpose of finding nothing. In other words, it was a cover-up.

It
wasn't the only time Spanier rigged an inept investigation for the
purpose of finding nothing. In 2010, his investigators found that Penn
State climatologist Michael Mann had done nothing wrong when he invented
his "hockey stick trick," to "hide the decline" and lend false
credibility to climate change theory. The difference between the Mann
investigation and the Sandusky investigation is that one covered up a
sex offender and the other covered up a fraud.

Do you remember that thing about how the banks wouldn't lend to
blacks and Hispanics because they were racists? And do you remember
how they passed the Community Reinvestment Act so that banks were
forced to reduce down payments practically to zero and lend to a
lot of people they knew were bad credit risks? And do you remember
how Wall Street bundled all these risky subprime mortgage and sold
them to investors around the world so that when it became clear
that those people weren't going to be able to pay their mortgages
banks everywhere were left holding the bag and all five of the Wall
Street investment houses either went under or had to be bailed out
by the federal government?

And do you remember how, when it was all over, liberals said it
was actually the banks' fault for "deceiving" all those people into
thinking they could afford to buy homes and that the banks should
be punished for it and some of those people be allowed to keep
their homes anyway? And do you remember how all this cost the
government close to a trillion dollars and put the whole economy in
a hole that we really haven't begun to dig ourselves out of
yet?

Well, get ready because the whole thing is about to happen
again.

Yes, believe it or not, the federal government is now starting
another initiative to force banks to lend
to low-credit-rated blacks and Hispanics -- not just anybody but
specifically blacks and Hispanics -- and is threatening -- and
already imposing -- huge punitive fines if they don't.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

It shouldn’t matter that I, an author with the audacity to select
such a title, am black. The arguments presented should stand or fall on
their objective merit. Nevertheless, I declare my racial identity at the
outset to defuse any prejudice readers may bring regarding the
motivation behind this piece. Indeed, it is in part because I am black
that the following must be said.

All things considered, blacks and the civil rights culture
surrounding them are the most open and prolific purveyors of racism in
America. This is an ironic travesty which spits upon the graves of
history’s abolitionists and offends all who are committed to a dream of
equality under the law and goodwill among men.

Surely, such a claim is provocative. Unfortunately, it is also demonstrable.

Trevor Loudon says “I'm a libertarian activist and political researcher from Christchurch
New Zealand. I believe in freedom with responsibility, not freedom from
responsibility. My ideal society is one in which government is confined
to protecting its citizens from criminals and external enemies. I
believe in working with all those who are moving in broadly the same
direction. The views expressed in this Blog are strictly my own.” Trevor
is also the founder and editor of KeyWiki.org, a rapidly growing website with the goal of unlocking the covert side of U.S. and Global politics."

Although Trevor lives in New Zealand, his blog details the activities of socialists, communists, and Islamists living and working in the U.S. He has just completed a speaking tour in Oklahoma.

In this video Trevor uses irony to express his views about Islam, their attitudes and behavior towards Christians, and President Obama's dhimmi presidency.

Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe told The Daily Caller he
believes President Barack Obama pressured the military into granting an
unprecedented exception to rules that prohibit participation in
political activities while in uniform.

The Defense Department authorized a waiver to allow uniformed service
members to march in last weekend’s San Diego gay pride parade,
overriding a Defense Department directive‘s specific rules against uniformed service members’ participation in political events.

“The Department of Defense isn’t allowing this to go on, it’s the
president,” Inhofe said in an interview with TheDC. “The secretary of
defense answers to the president, and the military answers to the
commander in chief. Clearly this is Barack Obama.”

In a letter to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Inhofe asked for an explanation of the decision.

“This apolitical stance has served our military well and earned the
respect of not just Americans but nations around the world as being a
professional organization, set aside from policies and agenda,” Inhofe
wrote.

The Pentagon officially said military members could march in their
dress blues and whites because the parade was garnering “national
attention.”

This is the first time in Inhofe’s 25 years in Congress the
Department of Defense has issued a waiver to override the directive, he
said.

A
striking clash between those who feel a profound duty to report that
the young Obama was nurtured by Marxists, socialists, and Communists and
those who think it is a better idea to erase this information from the
public record is on display in two current books. One book provided key
politically significant details of a heated debate I had with the young
Marxist-Leninist Obama over Christmas break
1980. The other book only confirmed that young Obama and his roommate
were both in my vicinity at the time. The gap between how Paul Kengor
covered Obama's Christmas break in The Communist and how David Maraniss covered this same moment in Barack Obama: The Story is chilling.

As
an eyewitness to young Obama's Marxist-Leninist ideology, I count
myself among those who think it is our duty to report the truth about
young Obama, especially if it helps us understand the persistent,
contemporary influence of Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist who became
young Barack Obama's mentor. I do not think it is any exaggeration to
suggest that in the long run, the mainstream media's failure to confront
the reality of young Obama's ideological extremism is almost as
important than the reality of Obama's tenure in office.

Salon
contributor Eric McHenry will likely be surprised to find himself
categorized as "the media," but his omissions and evasions about Obama
mentor Frank Marshall Davis so impressively mirror the major media's
that he deserves the honor.

What drew my attention to McHenry's recent article in Salon,
"Obama's Oddest Critic," is that yours truly is the "critic" in
question. According to the subtitle, "Jack Cashill is obsessed with the
president's college poetry and positive it proves his life is 'one
massive fraud.'" In that exactly none of my most recent 100 articles is
about Obama's poetry -- and only a few even mention it -- I doubt I rank high on anyone's obsession index other than McHenry's.

The
reason I mention the poetry at all is to shed light on the young
Obama's relationship with Davis, his Hawaiian mentor. In my early
writing on Obama's literary talents, I took him at his word that he
wrote some "very bad poetry" and largely ignored the two radically
different poems he submitted as an Occidental College undergraduate, the
cringe-worthy "Underground" and the more complex "Pop."

It
was my co-conspirator Don Wilkie who prompted me to take another look
at the latter poem. "I have read 'Pop' now maybe 20 or 30 times,"
Wilkie wrote me a few years back, "and I think it is about Obama telling
us that 'Pop' really is, his pop."

The State Department official is accused of being connected to a
vast foreign conspiracy, hostile to America. The official denies it, as
the Establishment rallies around the accused official. Indeed,
Establishmentarians not only dismiss any possibility of the official’s
guilt or complicity, but they also ferociously denounce those who raise
the possibility. After all, the official is a part of the in-group; it
just isn’t possible to think that the official could do anything wrong.
The Establishment is thus united around the proposition that the accused
official is a good person, and that the accusers are bad people. And
anyone who deviates from that orthodoxy risks being thrown out of the
Georgetown-to-Manhattan golden circle of status and respectability.

Am I describing the case of Huma Abedin, the aide to Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton? No, I am describing the case of Alger Hiss, back
in the 1940s. Hiss, who spent a decade working in the State Department,
was accused of being a Soviet spy by Whittaker Chambers in 1948. And
Chambers’ charges were brought before the Congress by a young House
freshman, Richard Nixon.

President Harry Truman, called the charges against Hiss “a red
herring”--that is, bogus. And he was joined by the rest of the
Establishment, which, after two decades of the New Deal and Fair Deal,
was solidly liberal and immune to the thought that a liberal could
really be a communist.

Yet the evidence against Hiss--the so-called “pumpkin papers” cited
by Chambers and Nixon--proved to be strong, and so he was indicted on
perjury charges in 1949. Even then, liberal luminaries of the day, such
as Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter and then-Illinois governor
and future presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson, appeared on Hiss’s
behalf in his trial as character witnesses. The following year, 1950,
Hiss was convicted of perjury--that is, convicted of lying about his
deep involvement in Soviet espionage--and sent to federal prison. Yet
even then, Secretary of State Dean Acheson declared, “I will not turn my
back on Alger Hiss.” Now that’s solidarity, Establishment-style.

Beyond the Hiss case, what was happening around the world during the
previous five years? Was it possible to argue that Hiss’s masters in
Moscow had benefited from their help in Washington? It was more than
possible.

In "Rep. Keith Ellison Rewrites History on his Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR Ties," at PJ Media,
July 21, the peerless investigator Patrick Poole uncovers Rep. Keith
Ellison's extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas-linked
CAIR, which Ellison is working hard to cover up:

The most recent salvo in the kerfuffle
between Minnesota congressmen Michele Bachmann and Keith Ellison finds
Ellison attacking Bachmann for her statements made on Glenn Beck’s radio
program on Thursday, where she said:

GLENN: Okay. So when you wrote this letter, then Keith
Ellison comes out. And Keith Ellison is ‑‑ he has a record of being the
Mafia hitman.

CONGRESSWOMAN BACHMANN: Well, he has a long record of being
associated with CAIR and with the Muslim Brotherhood. CAIR is an
unindicted co‑conspirator, as stated in the large terrorist financing
case that we’ve had in the United States of America and so he came out
and essentially wanted to shut down the inspectors general from even
looking into any of the questions that we were asking. So he wanted to
shut it down. In response I wrote another letter back to Keith Ellison,
a 16‑page letter which I would encourage all of your listeners to go
and read this letter. It’s what I call a bulletproof letter. I have 59
footnotes with one example after another of the penetration of the
Muslim Brotherhood into the federal government…

Islam is introducing Sharia into America under the guise of religious
freedom. We are told that Sharia is religious law and, therefore, we
should not worry about it. This is, at best, a half-truth.

To understand the Sharia, you MUST understand that it is completely
based on the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed (his words and actions that
are the model for being a perfect Muslim). So, the Sharia is nothing
more than a legal/social codification for every society to march in
lock-step doing life’s smallest details modeled after what the Koran
says and Mohammed said and did.

The biggest misunderstanding here
is that Islam is simply a religion. If Islam were only a religion, it
would not even exist today. And it would certainly not be feared. The
story of Mohammed and the success of his mission is well known. The
summary of it is in Islam’s growth curve:

Mohammed’s
career had two stages, religious and political. As a religious leader
he only converted about 150 Arabs into Muslims in his first 13 years in
Mecca. When he went to Medina, he became a politician and a jihadist.
Politics and jihad made Mohammed a success. When he died, every Arab was
a Muslim. If he had stayed with religion, when he died there would have
only be a few hundred Muslims and Islam would have collapsed. It was
politics that made Mohammed a success and it was politics that made
Islam a success for 1400 years.READ MORE . . .

If one Oklahoma lawmaker gets his way, any federal agent who comes the
Sooner state trying to enforce the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act – a.k.a. Obamacare – will face jail time, a $5,000 fine … or
both.

State Rep. Mike Ritze, R-Broken Arrow, believes Obamacare is
blatantly unconstitutional and it is his state’s right and
responsibility to declare it “null and void” under the U.S.
Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which states any powers not delegated to
the federal government are “reserved to the states respectively, or to
the people.”

“I feel very strongly that the 10th Amendment is basically the
watchdog of republic,” Ritze told WND. “The federal government was never
intended to be as overreaching as it has been with Obama’s health-care
act.”

Ritze authored a bill earlier this year, HB 1276, which essentially
“nullified” Obamacare in Oklahoma, a controversial approach to fighting
the law, but one Ritze believes is legal and justified.

“The Founding Fathers gave us nullification,” Ritze told WND. “James
Madison and Thomas Jefferson spoke about it, in the Kentucky Compact,
for example, asserting we [the states] created the federal government,
not the other way around.”

Ritze cited several precedents, including when states in 1798
nullified the federal Sedition Act, which declared anyone openly
speaking against the federal government could face charges of treason.

“They overruled it,” Ritze explained to the Tulsa Beacon. “States started saying they were not going to recognize it.”

Ritze also cited to WND the precedent of northern states during the
Civil War that nullified federal laws requiring the return of runaway
slaves and the recent example of his state of Oklahoma, which nullified
the Real ID Act mandating states put microchips in drivers’ licenses.
Twenty-two states don’t recognize federal laws against possession of
marijuana, he said, including California, which boasts hundreds of
businesses selling marijuana in violation of federal law.

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Rev. C.L. Bryant is making waves with his new documentary, Runaway Slave. I had the opportunity to preview the film in Bossier City, Louisiana, and I found the documentary thoroughly compelling.

Runaway Slave
was conceived by Rev. Bryant and supported by private donations and
FreedomWorks. It has been well-received in private screenings so far,
often receiving standing ovations, and is poised to open in select
theaters across the country next week. While at Regal Cinema 9 in
Bossier City, it was the highest grossing film there.

Herman Cain caught a great deal of flak
for his comment on the campaign trail that he "had left the Democratic
plantation," but he's not the only one saying it. Indeed, C.L. Bryant
has now joined the ranks of a number of black closet conservatives who
are speaking out against big government, which is what they perceive to
be the new plantation. And the list of black conservatives finding the
courage to speak out is growing.

Joining
Bryant in this documentary are famous faces like Herman Cain, Allen
West, Thomas Sowell, AlfonZo Rachel, and Alveda King. Sirius radio host
David Webb speaks out, and we meet a host of other black conservatives
who share their stories such as Mason Weaver, Marvin D. Rogers, and K.
Carl Smith, who is the founder of Frederick Douglass Republicans
and subscribes to the "four life-affirming values of Douglass: respect
for life, respect for the Constitution, belief in limited government and
individual responsibility."

The morning after Election Day, 2008, The New York Times proclaimed
that Barack Obama’s victory had swept “away the last racial barrier in
American politics.” However, as the President’s first term draws to a
close, a case can be made that the historic election was anything but
post-racial; rather, it has been the most racially polarizing presidency
in modern times.

This is not a surprise, however, to those familiar with Obama’s
background and thinking on racial matters, nor to those who have studied
the role played by Communist Frank Marshall Davis in raising him as a
young man in Hawaii during his critical coming of age period. Davis was
not only a slavish follower of Joseph Stalin, but a black racist who saw
sinister white plots in the foreign policies of the United States and
other Western nations.

Davis, a poet and writer, had written a controversial poem, “Christ
is a Dixie Nigger,” dismissing the object of the Christian faith as
“another New White Hope.”

Obama’s own book, Dreams from My Father, talks about asking
“Frank” for advice when his white grandmother had been accosted by a
black panhandler. Davis told Obama that his grandmother was right to be
scared and that “She understands that black people have reason to hate.”

Wrote in a column on July 20, 1946, that the Soviet Union had, “in
less than a generation,” abolished “discrimination and racism”

Wrote that “the only people” Winston Churchill cared about were “the white people of the British empire”

Labeled the Marshall Plan for Western Europe after World War II a
form of white imperialism, designed to “help maintain European empires
at the expense of exploited dark colonial peoples”

Considered anti-communism a form of racism

Some of this information about Davis was available in 2008, when
Accuracy in Media disclosed the fact that Obama’s mentor “Frank” in his
book, Dreams from My Father, was actually Frank Marshall Davis. We noted that, by Obama’s own account,
Davis had subjected the young man to racial advice and
diatribes. However, the Kengor book draws upon many of Davis’s columns,
published in Communist papers in Chicago and Hawaii, where these views
were put into print. Hence, it expands our understanding of Davis—and
therefore Obama. What’s more, Kengor looks at Davis’s views in terms of
Obama’s policies as President.

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Paul Kengor, Ph.D., a bestselling author whose works include Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century; God and Ronald Reagan; God and George W. Bush; God and Hillary Clinton; and The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism. His articles regularly appear in publications ranging from USA TODAY to The New York Times, plus numerous academic journals.

Five months ago Barack Obama nominated union backer, liberal
economist and Federal Reserve bureaucrat Erica Groshen to lead the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) — the agency best known for calculating
the nation's unemployment rate each month.

Obviously Groshen's nomination was yet another sop to organized labor
— which doled out big dollars and major manpower to help elect Obama in
2008 (and which has already been rewarded handsomely for its efforts).

It was also yet another endorsement of the failed Keynesian
interventionism that Obama has continued to foist on our private sector
ever since he was elected — with disastrous consequences for our
nation's economy.

But this particular appointment represents much more than just
another lifetime left winger being tapped by Obama to fill a lofty
taxpayer-funded perch. For starters, Groshen's background is more
explicitly linked to overt anti-American ideologies than any Obama
appointee since his infamous "green jobs czar" Van Jones.

Such radical ideological moorings are cause for real concern given
that Groshen is being asked to preside over an agency where the
inviolability of hard, methodologically obtained data — not the specter
of ideological influence — is vital to maintaining institutional
neutrality and credibility.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

[Regina] told me about her childhood in Chicago, the absent
father and struggling mother, the South Side's six-flat that never
seemed warm enough in winter and got so hot in the summer that people
went out by the lake to sleep....Her voice evoked a vision of black life
in all its possibility, a vision that filled me with longing--a longing
for place, and a fixed and definite history. As we were getting up to
leave, I told Regina I envied her. "For what?" "I don't know. For your
memories, I guess."

That passage, from Obama's (first) autobiography, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (pp.
158-9), describes "Regina," a young black woman at Occidental College
who he claimed was crucial to his political awakening. She even
encouraged him to drop "Barry" in favor of "Barack." He envied her
confidence, and her memories--so much so, in fact, that he made them up.
Not only was "Regina" not from the poor South Side of Chicago, but she
was not even black.

Here it is only mid-July and already the true thuggish face of the
Obama Permanent Campaign is emerging for all to see. When the president
of the United States feels utterly free to bash private enterprise and the now-deceased Protestant work ethic, and even tries to criminalize it, you know we have entered uncharted waters in American political history.

Not since the Copperhead Democrats
tried to appease the South and derail the Lincoln presidency have the
Democrats been such an explicitly anti-American party. The relatively
moderate party of JFK and Hubert Humphrey was hijacked in the streets of
Saul Alinsky’s Chicago in 1968 and at the Miami Beach convention of
1972, which nominated George McGovern, and was transformed into a
radical group that can no longer contain its animus against our country,
our history, and our Constitution.

I’ve often called the Democrats a “criminal organization masquerading
as a political party” — please read my brief new book on the subject, The People v. the Democratic Party, now available on Amazon, for chapter and verse. But the current rogues calling themselves “Democrats” are, as I pointed out last year over on NRO, especially dangerous:

For years now, I’ve been saying that the modern
Democratic party is the unholy issue of thirties gangsters and sixties
Marxists, a criminal organization masquerading as a political party,
composed of thugs, lawyers, layabouts, and guilt-ridden dupes, and
motivated entirely by a lust for power disguised as the phony virtue of
“compassion.” And I mean that in the nicest possible way: The
Republicans could use a little — no, make that a lot — of their ruthless
moxie.

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse have been investigating claims that President Obama's birth certificate, which the White House published on its website in April 2011, is a forged document.

In March 2012 Arpaio held a press conference to reveal the posse's initial findings. The results of their six-month investigation are available in an e-book, which is a transcription of the first press conference. At the press conference the officials explained their findings and presented video evidence demonstrating how the document was forged. Afterwards, instead of asking questions about the evidence, the journalists simply attacked the messengers. The journalists arrived with preconceived notions about the motives of the investigation, and were totally incurious about the extensive evidence.

Since then, Arpaio's team has done more investigation to determine the meaning of handwritten numbers that appear in various boxes where there is also text. For example, in the box asking for the race of the father, the birth certificate says "African" and nearby is a handwritten number 9. The investigators found the woman whose signature appears on the document. She said the number was a code which the registrar used to indicate that the person reporting the birth did not provide an answer to the question. If so, why does "African" appear in the box? The document conflicts with itself. Furthermore, in 1961, "African" was not used as a race indicator by the registrar. That word did not become a part of the lexicon until the 80s. There were also anomalies with the birth certificate number, which is out of batch sequence.

Arpaio's investigation also discovered a very disturbing problem with Hawaii's issuance of birth certificates, which the investigators say affects national security and the naturalization and immigration process. Hawaii apparently allows anyone who has resided in the state for a year to report a birth without attestation, including births of children born anywhere in the world. By doing so, they have for decades potentially been conferring citizenship on people not born in the U.S. Hawaii's state law bypasses the legal naturalization process.

At the very least, Congress needs to investigate Hawaii's law and procedures. Arpaio also believes congressional hearings should be held to investigate the document posted on the White House website.

The intrepid New York Times
stoically took up the task of considering whether its president, Barack
Obama, is a socialist or a communist. Pause right there: anyone
familiar with the Times knows how that process would unfold. Namely, the Times would find someone with some credibility on the issue to provide -- surprise! -- an answer in the negative. Obama a socialist or communist? Come on! Never!

True to form -- that is, the form of a transparently biased leftist organ masquerading as an objective news source -- the Times found Milos Forman, a Czech émigré who long ago came to Hollywood to make movies. Forman's answer? Again, a shocker: Obama is not a socialist or a communist. Thus satisfied, the Times faithful gave their assent. Ah, it is gospel truth, amen.

The analysis offered by Forman was so specious that I will not bother detailing it here. My fellow Cold War researcher, Ron Radosh, God bless him, accepted the painful task. You can read Radosh's spot-on analysis in PJ Media.

In short, this is why I quit reading the New York Times.
I can't stand the dishonesty. And to know that so many liberals digest
it like their daily bread, with unquestioning devotion, makes it too
much to endure. I, for one, will not subject myself to the duping.

He called out the "corporation executive" for not paying his "fair" share.

He attacked "GOP" tax cuts that "spare the rich" and "benefit millionaires."

He trumpeted the public sector over the private sector.

He advocated wealth redistribution from greedy "corporations" to "health insurance" and "public works projects."

He favored taxpayer-funding of universal health care. He supported
government stimulus to rescue America from (allegedly) another Great
Depression.

He wanted to rid America of "huge funds" finding their way into the
"pockets" of "Wall Street." "Instead," he declared, "money should be
spent for the benefit of the people instead of the corporations."

He supported nationalization and singled out General Motors for government action.

He favored the Russians at the expense of countries like Poland and Czechoslovakia.

He rejected Winston Churchill, and wanted the heralded prime minister nowhere within the White House.

He insisted that American foreign policy was about "big profits" for big oil.

He cited the American Founders and the U.S. Constitution, and
described himself and his policies as "progressive," while his
detractors accused him of being a communist.

He adopted slogans like "Forward" and "Change." He wanted to transform America through what he called "fundamental change."

Who is this man?

If you answered "Barack Obama," you're only half right. The answer is
Frank Marshall Davis, Hawaii mentor to Barack Obama, and Communist
Party USA (CPUSA) member No. 47544.

I got involved in one of the two great media scandals of our time -- the Obama ascendancy being the other -- fully by happenstance.

In the year 2000, investigative reporter James Sanders came to Kansas City to talk about his research
into the fate of TWA flight 800, the plane that crashed into the waters
off Long Island on July 17, 1996, sixteen years ago today.

Sanders
chose Kansas City because the town had historically been the
headquarters for TWA. As a result, many pilots, mechanics, and flight
attendants still lived there. The audience was filled with them.
Almost to a person, they believed what he was saying -- the plane had
been shot out of the sky.

Afterwards,
I went out to dinner with James and his wife, Elizabeth, and a dozen
other people. I sat next to Elizabeth, a sweet, unassuming former TWA
flight attendant and trainer of Philippine descent. She told me in
painful detail how at one of the many memorials she attended after the
crash -- 53 TWA employees were among the 230 killed -- she ran into an
old friend, Captain Terrell Stacey.Stacey
had flown the 747 that would become TWA Flight 800 from Paris to New
York the night before it was destroyed. In fact, he was in charge of
all TWA 747 pilot activity within the airline. So it was logical that
he would be among the first TWA employees assigned to the crash investigation.Elizabeth
thought of Stacey as "a straight arrow, go-by-the-rules kind of guy"
and respected him for it. After a phone introduction arranged by
Elizabeth, James Sanders and Terrell Stacey agreed to meet. "What he
told me over those first hours," Sanders would later tell me, "was one
thing: 'I know there's a cover-up in progress.'"

As
a result of that one introduction, the FBI arrested Elizabeth and
oversaw her conviction on federal conspiracy charges. James and Stacey
had been arrested, too. The crime? Stacey had sent Sanders a tiny
piece of foam rubber to have tested.READ MORE . . .

In the heat of passion during a radio interview, I said,“The NAACP, Congressional Black Caucus and Democratic Party are more destructive to blacks than the KKK!”

After the radio show, I thought my statement may have been a bit over the top. Upon further thought, I concluded that my statement is true. Before calling me crazy, please hear me out.

The mission of the KKK is to stifle black liberation via intimidation which is exactly what the modern black civil rights coalition continues to do to blacks. Both organizations despise self-starter, self-reliant and free thinking blacks.

The primary mission of the black civil rights coalition (NAACP/ CBC) and Democratic Party is to keep black Americans believing themselves eternal victims of an eternally racist white America. Many blacks have been successfully indoctrinated into believing every problem in the black community is the result of white oppression.

This is why the black civil rights coalition verbally brutalized black actor/comedian Bill Cosby for suggesting that blacks embrace moral responsibility, hard work and self-reliance to solve problems in their community.

This is also why the black civil rights coalition hates two of the most powerful blacks on the planet; Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Thomas and Rice achieved extraordinary success competing without special concessions or lowered standards due to their race. The KKK shares the black civil rights coalition's disdain for such uppity self-reliant “n------”.

As I stated, the mission of the KKK is to suppress blacks. The black civil rights coalition has assisted in the fulfillment of the KKK's mission for decades.

Democratic Party failed-policies supported by the black civil rights coalition have destroyed the black family and sparked epidemic out-of-wedlock births. They have created fatherless black boys who run to gangs in search of male bonding. Blacks are disproportionately represented in prisons, have epidemic high school dropout rates and genocidal levels of black abortions – all due to Democrat led government intrusion.

Yes, monolithic loyal voting for Democrats has truly paid off for blacks. It would be fitting and proper for the KKK to send the black civil rights coalition a “Thank You” card for wreaking such havoc in the black community.

A black man in the White House is the ultimate symbol of America's repentance from her sin of slavery. And yet, to preserve its relevance, the black civil rights coalition strives to convince blacks that race relations have progressed very little since the 1950s. Meanwhile, President Obama is the huge black elephant – or perhaps, I should say donkey – in America's living room proving otherwise.

The NAACP further revealed its true colors when Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney addressed its members at their convention.

Clearly, this once-great organization, which comprised champions of civil rights, has morphed into a shameful liberal activist hate group. They do not give-a-hoot about real black empowerment. Their mission is solely to advance a far-left, liberal, socialist/progressive and anti-America agenda. The NAACP has sold its soul for a seat at its white liberal massa's table. This disgraceful bunch no longer deserves our respect.

The NAACP called Romney offensive for speaking about family values, self-reliance, character and hard work – values touted by MLK.

The liberal NAACP audience wanted Romney to give an Obama type speech proclaiming that business owners are rich selfish SOBs! They wanted Romney to vow to punish achievers and redistribute their ill-gotten gain (earnings) to black America. Such a speech would have won Romney a standing ovation.

This is why, as a black conservative, I have disassociated myself from the evil low-rent modern black civil rights coalition. They consistently appeal to black America's lower nature, promoting victimhood-ism, class envy and racial hatred. I refuse to be a part of such a bottom-feeding mindset.

Also, there are grave consequences associated with constantly telling blacks they need lower standards and special concessions to succeed. Such bigotry of low expectations sends a not-so-subliminal message to blacks. The message is blacks are intellectually challenged and inferior. The KKK could not do a better job of negatively impacting the self-esteem of black Americans.

Further insulting blacks is the black civil rights coalition's argument that requiring a photo ID to vote will disenfranchise black voters. In essence, they are saying blacks are too stupid to find their way to acquire a photo ID. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/237031-holder-pledges-aggressive-fight-against-texas-voter-identification-law

A photo ID is required to board an airplane, cash a check and do a host of other things. But somehow, acquiring a photo ID is too challenging for blacks. It appears the KKK, black civil rights coalition and Democratic Party all agree that blacks are just not as smart as whites.

The black civil rights coalition and the Democrats have a cow when conservative Republicans bring up morality. They are outraged when conservatives suggest that it might be problematic that 73% of black babies are born out of wedlock. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/doj-alum-racial-profiling-hearing-calls-crimes-out-wedlock-births-black-community

Here is what the Obama administration, praised by the black civil rights coalition, considers black empowerment. Proudly declared as an effort to assist black America, the Obama administration announced it has softened the penalty for possession of crack cocaine. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2899824/posts

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Beginning
with the FDR
administration's New
Dealand increasing the population's need and
misinterpretation as to what are entitlements during the LB
Johnson administration's Great
Society programs, too many Americans have become dependent
upon the government being brainwashed into thinking government is
better than private sector charity programs.

If the people cannot trust their government to do the
job for which it exists - to protect them and to promote their common
welfare - all else is lost.Barack Obama

Sunday, July 8, 2012

On July 4th I co-hosted the Campaign To Defeat Obama Telethon. We raised funds to wage campaigns in four states which Obama won last election, Wisconsin, Ohio, Michigan and Nevada. Our goal is to win those states delivering 50 electoral votes to Mitt Romney. Patriots across America responded well making the telethon a success.

I thought it might be interesting to share a little behind the scenes info with you.

After the broadcast, a few of our staff who were taking donations over the phones said they were shocked at the number of hate-filled emotion driven idiotic calls from Obama supporters.

Obama brain dead callers expressed outrage that we would dare oppose America's first black president on Independence Day. A caller said, “I'm gonna find out where that traitorous n-----, Lloyd Marcus, lives and kick his a--! I will go to a tea party and punch him in the face!”

Obama callers were equally vile expressing their anger at Dr Alveda King, niece of Dr Martin Luther King, Jr. for her appearance on the telethon. An Obama caller absurdly claimed Obama was responsible for Dr King and I having the freedom to be on the telethon. Another Obama caller said if Republicans had their way, African-Americans would still be slaves. Patriots, can you believe they believe such nonsense?

Black Obama zombies who have a knee-jerk hatred toward black conservatives such as Dr Alveda King are particularly frustrating. These Democratic Party indoctrinated blacks believe any black who does not scream from the rooftops, “I am a victim!” must be a traitor to their race.

While in reality, black conservatives are true heroes, advocates of “real” black empowerment via education, hard work and self reliance. MLK would turn over in his grave upon learning that such values are considered too high minded, too much to expect from blacks and a turn-off in the modern civil rights movement.

Dr Alveda King is laser focused on her life's mission to protect innocent unborn babies. Black babies are aborted at a genocidal high rate -- more than any other ethnic group in America. So why on earth do black leaders side with cheerleaders of abortion and seek to destroy Dr. Alveda King? Stupid black supporters of policies which harm blacks called into our telethon trashing Dr King.

Some Obama supporters called into the telethon inquiring, “Is this where I call to vote for Obama?” I kid you not folks. These clueless, ignorant, racist and lazy people make up a large percentage of Obama's base. I pray there are more of us than them in November.

Our telethon was packed with so many top conservatives who wished to chime in that we were forced to reduce some interviews down to two minutes to fit everyone in before the end of the program.

I was thrilled to hear a common theme which dominated the telethon. Conservatives across America are well aware of the seriousness of the situation in which we find ourselves as freedom loving Americans.

They realize the dire consequences of Obama having a second term to fully implement his vowed “fundamental transformation of America.” A second term for Obama would mark the end of America as we know it.

America's top conservatives are united in their commitment to defeat this evil tyrannical enemy-within threatening our great country. Obama MUST be a one term president.

Judging from the number of Obama supporters who called our telethon accusing us of racism, media attacks calling us racist and threats on my life for daring to be a freedom loving black patriot, clearly the old and tattered “race card” will play a prominent role in Obama's reelection campaign.

Think about that folks. For the first time in U.S. History, we have a president we are not allowed to disagree with or criticize in any way. Those who dare oppose King Obama will suffer the pain and humiliation of having “racist” branded on their forehead by the White House and Obama's mainstream media enforcers.

Patriots, we cannot and will not be silenced by their absurd baseless accusations. You MUST remain bold and fearless Americans, standing up for truth, justice and the American Way!

Friday, July 6, 2012

There is ample evidence that Barack Obama, and people under his supervision, committed at least one felony -- specifically, illegal gambling across state lines -- to fund his 2008 election campaign. Congress, meanwhile, found Obama's attorney general, Eric Holder, in contempt
for refusal to testify about Operation Fast and Furious. Orchestration
of straw purchases of firearms, one of which resulted in the death of a
law enforcement officer, could easily be another felony.

The Obama Campaign's Numbers Racket

The general definition of a lottery
is an activity that includes (1) mandatory payment of consideration --
i.e., money -- as a condition of participation, (2) a prize -- i.e.,
anything of value, such as an expenses-paid trip, and (3) an element of
chance in the selection of the prize winners. It is against federal law
to conduct a lottery across state lines, and it is illegal in almost
every state to conduct an unauthorized or unlicensed lottery or other
gambling activity. This is true even in states like Nevada that are
famous for their (licensed) gambling establishments.

The
Obama campaign ran at least two such lotteries in 2007 and 2008 before
changing them to allow entry without a contribution. The change was the
direct result of complaints from a law enforcement agency. There is still a YouTube video
of Mr. Obama himself making a pitch for one of these lotteries, and
here is an e-mail from the Obama campaign with the relevant parts of the
full headers. IP address 70.42.50.185 still traces to Blue State
Digital, which was indeed the service provider for the Obama campaign. (This does not
mean that Blue State Digital was involved in any way with the alleged
illegal actions of the Obama campaign; it is, however, evidence that the
following e-mail came from the Obama campaign and was not circulated by
a malicious third party.) We have highlighted the three elements of a
lottery: payment of consideration, element of chance, and a prize of
value. We have also bolded evidence that the lottery was dishonest, and
that it cheated many of those who entered.