Now, Mr. Mayor, fellow democrats we are here to nominate a
President, and I've got one in mind.

I want
to nominate a man whose own life has known its fair share of adversity and
uncertainty. I want to nominate a man who ran for
President to change the course of an already weak economy and then just six
weeks before the election, saw it suffer the biggest collapse since the Great
Depression. A man who stopped the slide into depression, and put us on the long
road to recovery, knowing all the while that no matter how many jobs that he
saved or createdcreated and saved, there would still
millions more waiting, worrying about feeding their own kids, trying
to feed their children andtrying to keep their hopes alive.

I want
to nominate a man who iscool on the outside but who burnsburning for
America on the inside. I want a man who believes, with no doubt, that we can
build a new American Dream economy driven by innovation and creativity, byeducation,
and yes, bycooperation. And by the way, after last night I want a man
who had the good sense to marry Michelle Obama.

Now, I, I,I want Barack Obama to be the next President of the United
States and I proudly nominate him to beas the
standard bearer of the Democratic Party.

In
Tampa, a few days ago,we heard a lot of talk about how the President
and the Democrats don't believe in free enterprise and individual initiative,
how we want everyone to be dependent on the government, how bad we are for the
economy.

ThisThe Republican narrative, this
alternative universesays that everyone of us in
this room who amounts is that all of us who amount to anything wereare
completely self-made. One of theour greatest chairmen
the Democratic Chairmenever had, Bob
Strauss, used to say that "every politician wants you to
believe he was born in a log cabin he built himself," but as
Strauss then admittied,"it ain't
so."

We
Democrats, we think the country works better
with a strong middle class, with real opportunities for poor people
folks to work their way into it, and
witha relentless focus on the future,
with business and government actually working together to promote
growth and broadly shared prosperity. You see, we believe that
We think "we're all in this
together" is a better philosophy than "you're on your own."

Now,
so. Who's right? Well since 1961, f0r 52 years now, the
Republicans have held the White House 28 years, the Democrats 24. In those 52
years, our private economy produced 66 million
private sector jobs. So, Wwhat's
the jobs score? Republicans 24 million, Democrats 42 million!

Now,
there's a reason for this. It turns out that advancing equal
opportunity and economic empowerment is both morally right and good economics.
Why?,Bbecause
poverty,discrimination,
poverty
and ignorance restrict growth. When you stifle
human potential when you don't invest in news ideas, it doesn't just cut of the
people who were affected it hurts us all,while
We know that investments in education,
and
infrastructure and scientific and technological research increase it
growth, creating moreThey increase
good jobs and they create new wealth for all the
rest of us.

Now,
there's something I've
noticed lately, and you probably have too. And it's
this, maybe it's just because I grew up in a
different time.Though I often disagree with
Republicans, I actually never learned to hate them
the way the far right that now controls their party seems to hate our President
Obama
and a lot of other the Democrats.
That
would be impossible for me because After all, President
Eisenhower sent federal troops to my home state to integrate Little Rock
Central High School. and
President Eisenhower built the interstate highway system. And When
I was a asgovernor,
I worked with President Reagan and his White House on
the
first round of welfare reform and with President George H.W. Bush
on national education goals.

I am actually
very grateful, if you saw from the film of what I do today, I
have to be grateful and you should be too to
that President George W. Bush for supported
PEPFAR.,which
It is savingsaved
the lives of millions of people in poor countries and I have been honored to
work with to both Presidents Bush on
National disasters; in the for the work we've
done together after theaftermath
of the South Asia tsunami, Hurricane
Katrina and the horrible earthquake in Haiti. Haitian
earthquake.

Through
my foundation, both, in America and around the world,
I am workingall
the time with Democrats, Republicans and Independents.
Sometimes I couldn't tell you on my life on who I am working with
because we focus who
are focused on solving problems and seizing opportunities, and not
fighting each otherall the time.

So
here's what I want to say to you, and here is what I want the people at home to
think about.When times are tough, and people are
frustrated, and angry and hurting and uncertain, the politics of constant
conflict may be good politics but what is good politics
does not necessarily work in the real world. What works in the
real world is, cooperation works better. What works in the real world is
cooperation, business and government, foundations and universities. Ask the
mayor's who are here. Los Angeles is getting green and Chicago is
getting an infrastructure bank
because Republicans and Democrats are working together to get it. They didn't
check their brains at the door, they didn't stop disagreeing,
but their purpose was to get something done. Now, why is this true,
why does cooperation work better than constant conflict After
all,because nobody's right all the time,
and a broken clock is right twice a day. And every
one of us, every one of All
of us and every one of
them we're
compelled are destined to live our fleeting
lives between those two extremes. No one is ever
going to be right all the time and hopefully we're right more
than twice a day.Unfortunately, the faction that now
dominates the Republican Party doesn't see it that way. They think government
is always the enemy, they're always right and
compromise is weakness.

Just
in the last couple of elections they defeated two distinguished Republican
senators because they dared to cooperate with Democrats on
issues important to the future of the country, even National Security. They
beat a Republican congressman with almost a hundred
percent voting record on every conservative score because he said he realized
he did not have to hate the President
to disagree with him. Boy, that was a
non-starter and they threw him out.

One of
the main reasons we ought to America should re-elect
President Obama is that he is still committed to constructive cooperation.
Look
at his record, look at his record, Look at his record. He
appointed Republican Secretaries of Defense, the Army and Transportation. He
appointed a Vice President who ran against him in 2008, and trusted him that
Vice President to oversee the successful end of the war in Iraq
and the implementation of the recovery act. And Joe Biden did a great job with
both. Now, Hhe,
President Obama appointed several members of his
Cabinet members who even though they supported
Hillary in the primaries. Heck, he even appointed Hillary! I'm I am so very
proud of her and grateful toI am proud of the job
she andour entire the
national security team have done for America. I am grateful that they have
worked together for all they've done to make us safer
and stronger and to build a world with more partners and fewer enemies. I'm also
grateful for the relationship,
respect, and partnership that she and the President have enjoyed and the signal
that sends to the world that democracy does not have to be a bloodsport. It can
be an honorable enterprise that advances the
public interest.

Besides
the national security team I have very grateful to the young
men and women who served our
country in uniform through these perilous times. the
military andAnd I am especially grateful to
Michelle Obama and to Jill Biden for supporting military
families when while their
loved ones are overseas and for helping supporting
our veterans when they came home.,wWhen
they come home bearing the wounds of war, or needing help with to
find education, or jobs or housinghousing,
and jobs.

President
Obama's whole record on national security is a
tribute to his strength, and his judgment, and to his preference
for inclusion and partnership over partisanship. We need more of it in
Washington D.C.

Now,
we all know Hhe also
tried to work with Congressional Republicans on Health Care, debt reduction,
and new jobs, but and that
didn't work out so well. Probably But it could have been
because, as the Senate Republican leader said, in
a remarkable moment of candor, said two full years
before the election, their number one priority was not to put America back to
work, but it was to
put the President Obama out
of work. Senator, I hate to break it to you, but we're going to keep President
Obama on the job! Are you ready for that? Are
you willing to work for it?

Audience:
Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

In
Tampa,did you watch their
convention? I did. In Tampa, the Republican argument against the
President's re-election was actually pretty simple,
pretty snappy. It went something like this: we left him a total
mess, he hasn't cleaned it up fast enough, so fire him and put us back in.

But
they did it well. They looked good they sounded good.
They convinced me that they all love their families and their children and were
grateful that they had been born in America and
all, really I am not being – they did. And
this is important, they convinced me that they were
honorable people who believed what they said and
they are going to keep every commitment they've made. Wejust got to make sure the American people
know what those commitments are.

Because
in In order
to look like an acceptable, reasonable, moderate alternative to
President Obama, they just couldn't didn't
say very much about the ideas they have
offered over the last two years. They couldn't because You
see they want to go back to the same old policies that got us into
trouble in the first place.: They
want to cut taxes for high income Americans even more than President
Bush did; , they want to
get rid of those pesky financial regulations designed to prevent another crash
and prohibit future bailouts; , they want to
increase defense spending two trillion dollars more than the Pentagon has
requested without saying what they'll spend the moneyit
on; and they want to make enormous cuts in
the rest of the budget, especially programs that help the middle class and poor
kidschildren.
As another President once said – there they go again.

Now,
I like the argument for President Obama's re-election a lot
better. Here it is. He inherited a deeply
damaged economy, he put a floor under the crash, he began
the long hard road to recovery, and laid the foundation for a modern, more
well-balanced economy that will produce millions of good new jobs, vibrant new
businesses, and lots of new wealth for the innovators. Now, aAre
we where we want to be? No. Is the President satisfied? NoOf
course not. Are we better off than we were when he took office?,
Listen to this, everybody has forgot that when PresidentBarack
Obama took office, the with an economy
was
in free fall, it had just shrunk nine full percent of
GDP. We were losing 750,000 jobs a month. Are we doing better
than that today? The answer is YES.

Here
is the challenge he faces, and the challenge all of you who support him face. I
get it, I know it, I've been there. I understand the
challenge we face. I know manyA lot of
Americans are still angry and frustrated with about
thise
economy. If you look at the numbers you knowThough
employment is growing, banks are beginning to lend again and
in
a lot of places even housing prices are even
beginning to picking up a bit, but too
many people don't do not feel
it, yet.

I had experienced
the same thing happen in 1994 and early '1995.
Our
We could see that the policies were
working,and that
the economy was growing but most people didn't feel it yet. Thankfully
Bby 1996,
the economy was roaring, everybody felt it and we were halfway
through the longest peacetime expansion in American the history of
the United States..

But,
the difference this time is purely in the circumstances. President
Obama started with a much weaker economy than I did. Listen to me now. No
President, no president – not me,or notany
of my predecessors, no one could have fully
repaired all the damage that he found
in just four years. But he has laid the foundations for a new modern
successful economy of shared prosperity,conditions
are improving and if you'll renew the President's contract you
will feel it. You will feel it.

Folks,
whether the American people believe what just said or not,
maybe the whole electionI just want you
to know that I believe that it. wWith
all my heart, I believe it..

Now
why do I believe it? I'm fixing to tell you why. I believe it because President
Obama's approach embodies the values, the ideas, and the direction America must
has to take to build a 21st century
version of the American Dream in.a A nation
of shared opportunities, shared prosperity, a shared sense of
community.and shared responsibilities.

So
let's get back to the story. In 2010, as the President's recovery
program kicked in, the job losses stopped and things began to turn around.

The
Recovery Act saved and or created
millions of jobs and cut taxes, let me say this again, cut taxes for
95% percent of the American people.
In the last 29 months the economy has produced about 4.5 million private sector
jobs. We could have done better Bbut
last year, the Republicans blocked the President's jobs plan costing the
economy more than a million new jobs. So here's another jobs score: President
Obama plus 4.5 million, Congressional Republicans zero.

Over
that sameDuring this period, more than more
than 500,000 manufacturing jobs have been created under President Obama,
that's –
the first time manufacturing jobs have increased since the 1990s.

And
I'll tell you something else, Tthe
auto industry restructuring worked. It saved more than a million jobs, and not
just at GM, Chrysler and their dealerships, but in auto parts manufacturing all
over the country. That's why even auto-makers that who weren't
part of the deal supported it. They needed to save the those
part suppliers too. Like I said, we're all in this together.

So
what's happened?Now
tThere are now 250,000
more people working in the auto industry than on the
day the companies were restructured. Now we all know, Governor
Romney opposed the plan to save GM and Chrysler. So here's another jobs score,
are you listening in Michigan and Ohio and across the country?
Here is another jobs score: Obama two hundred and fifty thousand,
Romney, zero.

The
agreement the administration made with management, labor and environmental
groups to double car mileage that was a good deal too.over
the next few years is another good deal: it will cut your gas
prices in half—your
gas bill—no matter what the price is if you double the
mileage of your car it will cut
your gas bill in will
be half of what it would have been., It
will make us more energy independent, it wil cut
greenhouse gas emissions, and according to several analyses,
over the next 20 years it will bring us add
another half a million 500,000
good, new jobs into the American
economy.

The President's
energy strategy which he calls Obama's "all of the
above" energy plan is helping too – the boom
in oil and gas production combined with greater energy efficiency has driven
oil imports to a near 20 year low and natural gas production to an all time
high. And Rrenewable
energy production has also doubled.

Of course
we need a lot more new jobsWe do need more new
jobs, lots of them, but there are already more than three million
jobs open and unfilled in America today,
mostly because the applicants people who apply for
them don't,yet, have
the required skills to do them. So even as we get Americans
more jobs Wwe have
to prepare more Americans for the new jobs that are actually going to being
created. The old economy is not coming back we got to
build a new one and educate people to do those jobs. in
a world fueled by new technology.That's why investments
in our people are more important than ever.

The
President and his education secretary has have
supported community colleges and employers in working together to
train people for open jobs that are actually
open in their communities. And even more important,
after a decade in which exploding college costs have increased the drop-out
rate so much that the percentage of our young people with four year
college degrees has come down so much that we've fallen to 16th in
the world in the percentage of our young
adults
people with college degrees.,

So
the Presidents his student loan reform is
more important than ever. Here's what it does, you need to tell every voter
where you live about this: it lowers the cost of federal student
loans and even more important, it gives
students the right to repay the loans as a clear fixed
low
percentage of their incomes for up to 20 years. Now
what does this mean? What does this mean? Think on it. It means That
means no one will have to drop-out of college again for
fear they can't repay their debt, and it means that if
someone wants to take a job with a modest income, no
one will have to turn down a job, as a teacher, a police officer
or a small town doctor in a little rural area, they won't
have to turn those jobs down because it doesn'tthey
don't pay enough to make repay
the debt payments. Their debt obligation
will be determined by their salary.This will change the future for
young Americans.

I
don't know about you, but all these issues, I know we're better
off because President Obama made these the decisions he
did.

Now,
tThat brings me to health care.

The
Republicans call it, derisively, Obamacare.and
They say it's a government takeover, a
disaster and if we just elect them they'll
repeal it. Well are they right?

AUDIENCE:
NO!

of health care that
they'll repeal. Are they right? Let's look at what's happened so
far. First, Iindividuals
and businesses have secured more than a billion dollars in refunds from their
insurance premiums because the new law requires 80% percent to 85 percent %
of your premiums to go to yourbe spent on health
care, not profits or promotion.And
the gains are even greater than that because a bunch of Other
insurance companies have lowered their rates to meet
comply with the requirement. Second,
Mmore than
3 million young people between 19 and 25 are insured for the first time because
their parents policies can now carrycover
them on family policies. Third,
Mmillions
of seniors are receiving preventive care,including
all the way from breast cancer
screenings and to tests
for heart problems, and scores of other things, and younger people
are getting them, too. Fourth, Ssoon
the insurance companies, not the government, the insurance of
companies will have millions of new customers many of them middle
class people with pre-existing conditions who could never get
insurance before. Now, finally, listen
to thisAnd.Ffor
the last two years, after going up at three times the rate of inflation
for a decade, for the last two years health care spending
has growncosts have been under 4%, percent
in both years, for the first time in 50 years.

So,
let me ask you something, are we all better
off because President Obama fought for it and passed ithealth
care reform? You bet we are.

Now,
Tthere
were two other attacks on the President in Tampa that deserve an answer. Both
Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan attacked the President for allegedly
robbing Medicare of 716 billion dollars. That's the same attack
they leveled against congress in 2010, and they got a lot of votes on it. But
it's not true. Look, Hhere's
what really happened. You be the judge. Here's what really happened.There
were no cuts to benefits, at all. None. What the President did
was to save money by taking the
recommendations of a commissionof
professionals to cut cutting
unwarranted subsidies to providers and insurance companies that weren't
were not making people any healthier and
were not necessary to get the providers to provide the service.

And
instead of raiding medicare, Hhe
used the savings to close the donut hole in the
Medicare drug program, and, you all got to listen to this, this is really
important.And to add eight years to the life of
the Medicare Trust Fund so it is . It's now
solvent until 2024. So President Obama and the Democrats didn't weaken
Medicare, they strengthened itMedicare.

Now,
Wwhen
Congressman Ryan looked into the TV camera and attacked President Obama's
Medicare savings as the "biggest coldest power play," in
raiding Medicare, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. You
seeBecause, that 716 billion dollars is
exactly, to the dollar, the same amount of
Medicare savings Congressman Ryanthat he
hads in his
own budget. You got give one thing:It
takes some brass to attack a guy for doing what you did.

Now
you are having a good time, but this is getting serious, and I want you to
listen. It's important, because a lot of people believe
this stuff.

Now
at least on this issue, At at least
on this one issue, Governor Romney's been
consistent. He attacked President Obama too, but heactually
wants to repeal the savings and give the money back to the
insurance companies. He wants to go back to the old system which means
we'll, re-open the donut hole and force
seniors to pay more for drugs, and we'll reduce
the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by eight full years.
So now if he's elected and if does what he promised to
do, Medicare will now go
broke by 2016. Think about that. That means after all
we won'tIf that happens, you won't have to
wait until their voucher program to begins in 2023 to see the end of Medicare
as we know it. They're going to do it to
us sooner than we thought.

Now
folks this is serious, becauseBut it
gets worse, and you won't be laughing when I finish telling
you this. They also want to block grant Medicaid and cut it by a
third over the coming decadeten years.
Of course, that's going to will
hurt a lot of poor kids, but that's not
all. A lot of folks don't know it butAlmost
nearly two-thirds of Medicaid is spent on nursing home care for
seniors for Medicare seniors who are eligible for
Medicaid. It's going to end Medicare as we know it.aAnd a
lot of that money is spent on people with disabilities, including kids
froma lot of middle class families,
with special needs like, whose kids have
Downs syndrome or Autism, or other severe conditions. And,
honestly just think about it. If that happens, I don't know how what
those families are going to do. deal
with it.So I know what I'm going to do, I am
going to do everything I can to see that it doesn't happen. We
can't let it happen. We can't.

AUDIENCE:
Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

Now
let's look at the other big charge the Republicans
made. It's a real doozy.They actually have charged
and run ads saying that President Obama wants to weaken the work
requirements in the welfare reform bill I signed that moved millions of people
from welfare to work.

You
need to know, Hhere's
what happened. Nobody tells you what really happned. Here's what
happened.When some Republican governors asked if they could have
waivers to try new ways to put people on welfare back to work, the
Obama Administration listened. Because we all know that it's
hard for even people with good work histories to get jobs today, so moving
folks from welfare to work is a real challenge.And
the administration agreed to give waivers to
those governors and others said they would only
do
it if they had a credible plan to increase employment by 20%. percent. And they could keep the waivers only
if they did increase employment.You
hear that?Now, did I make myself clear?The
requirement was Mmore work,
not less.

So,
this is personal to me, we moved millions of people off welfare. It was one of
the reasons, that in the eight years I was president, we had
100 times as many people move out of poverty into the middle class than
happened under the previous 12 years, a 100
times as many. It's a big deal.But
I am telling you, the claim that President Obama weakened welfare
reform's work requirement is just not true. But they keep running ads on claiming
it. You want to know why? As
theirTheir campaign pollster said
"we're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers."
Now, finally I can say, that is true. I
couldn't have said it better myself – and I
just
hope you and every Americanremember that every
time you see one of those the ads,
and it turns into an ad to reelect Barack Obama and the keep fundamental
principles of personal empowerment and moving everybody who
can get a job into work as soon as we
can..

Now,
Llet's
talk about the debt. Today, interest rates are lower, lower than the
rate of inflation. People are practically paying us to borrow
money, to hold their money for them. But it will become a
big problem when the economy grows and the interest rates start to rise. We
have to deal with it this big long-term
debt problem or it will deal with us. It will goggle up a
bigger and bigger of the federal budget we'd rather spend on education,
and health care, and sciene and technology. We got to deal with it.

Now
what has the President done? President ObamaHe
has offered a reasonable plan with of $4
trillion dollars in debt reduction over a
decade, with two and a half$2.5dollars
trillion coming from — for every $2.5
trillion in spending cuts, he raises a dollar in new
revenues. 2.5 to 1. of spending reductions
for every one dollar of revenue increases, aAnd he
has tight controls on future spending. It's That's
the kind of balanced approach proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles
commission, a bipartisan commision.

Now I
think the President's this plan
is way better than the Gov.
Romney's plan.,because
First the Romney plan fails the first
test of fiscal responsibility: The numbers just don't
add up.

I
mean consider this. What would you do if
you had this problem? Somebody says, "Oh we got a big debt problem, we got to
reduce the debt." So whats the first thing he says we're going to
do? "Well, to reduce the debt, It's supposed to be a
debt reduction plan but it begins withwe're going to have
anotherfive $5 trillion
dollars
in tax cuts over a ten-year periodheavily
weighted to upper-income people. That makesSo
we'll make the debt hole bigger before they even start to dig
outwe start to get out of it."

Now,
when you say "What you're going to do about this $5 trillion you
just added on?" They say "Oh we'll they'll
make it up by eliminating loopholes in the tax code."So,Wthen
you ask "which loopholes and how much?," You
know what they say "See me about
that me after the election on
that." I'm not making it up, that's
their position, "See me about that after the election."

Now,
Ppeople
ask me all the time how we delivered got four
surplus budgets in a row. What new ideas did we bring to
Washington? I always give a one-word answer: arithmetic.

If they
stay with a this $5
trillion dollar tax cut in a debt reduction
plan – the – arithmetic tells us, no
matter what they say,that one
of three things will happen: 1) Assuming
they try to do what they say they'll do cover it by
deductions, cutting those dedeductions. One tthey'll
have to eliminate so many deductions like the ones for home mortgages and
charitable giving that middle class families will see their tax bill go up two
thousand dollars$2,000year while
people
anybody making over 3 million dollars or
more a year get will still see
their tax billget a go down$250,000
dollar tax cut; or 2) they'll have to cut so much spending that
they'll obliterate the budget for our the national
parks, for ensuring clean air, clean water, safe food, safe air travel; or,
they'll cut way back on Pell Grants, college loans, early childhood education,
child nutrition programs. All the and other
programs that help empower middle class families and help
poor childrenkids,
not to mentionor they'll cut back in
cutting investments in roads, and bridges,
and
science and,
technology and biomedical research. That's what they
will do. They will hurt the middle class and the poor, and the put the future
on hold to give tax cuts to upper income people who have been
getting it all along; or 3) Despite all their
rhetoric they'll just keep doing what
they've been doing for thirty plus years now – they're
going to cut taxes way more
than they're going to cut spending
especially with that big defense increase. And they'll,
explode the debt, and weaken the economy, and they'll desetroy
the federal government's ability to help you by letting interest gobble up all
your tax payments.

Remember,Don't
you ever forget, when you hear them talking about this, that
Republican economic policies quadrupled the national debt
before I took office, in the 12 years before I took office
and doubled the debt it in
the eight years after I left, because it defied
arithmetic. It was a highly inconvenient thing for them in our
debates that I was just a country boy from Arkansas and I came from a place
where people still thought two and two was four. It's
arithmetic.We simply cannot't
afford to give the reins of government to someone who will double-down
on trickle-down.

Now,
think about this, President Obama's plan cuts the debt, honors our
values, and brightens the future for our children,
our families and our nation. It's a heck of a lot better. It passes the
arithmetic test, and far more important it passes the values test.

My
fellow Americans, all of us in this grand hall and everybody watching
at home, when we vote in this election we will be you
have to decideing what
kind of country you we want
to live in. If you want a winner take all you're on your own, winner
take all society you should support the Republican ticket. If But
if you want a country of shared opportunities and shared
responsibilities – a "we're all in it together" society, you should
vote for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. If you want America, if you want every
American to vote and you think itsit's
wrong to change voting procedures just to reduce the turnout of younger,
poorer, minority and disabled voters, you should support Barack Obama. If you
think the President was right to open the doors of American opportunity to all
those young immigrants who were brought
here as childrenwhen they were youngso
who want to go to college orthey
can serve in the military or go to college,
you should must vote
for Barack Obama. If you want a future of shared prosperity, where the middle
class is growing and poverty is declining, where the American Dream is reallyalive
and well, and where the United States remains the leadingits
leadership as a force for peace and prosperity in a this
highly competitive world, you should have
to vote for Barack Obama. Look, I
love our country so much– and I
know we're coming back. For more than 200 years, through every crisis, we've
always come back. People have predicted our demise ever since
George Washington was criticized for being a mediocre
surveyor with a bad set of wooden false teeth. And so far ever single person
who has bet against America has lost money. Because we always
comeback, we come through every fire outa
little stronger a little better. than we went in. And
we will again as long as we do it together.And we do it because
in the end Wwe
champion the cause for which our founders pledged their lives, their fortunes,
their sacred honor, the cause of – to forming
a more perfect union.

My
fellow Americans, Iif
that's what youwant believe,
if that's what you believewant, we you
must vote and you have tomust
re-elect President Barack Obama.