Post by m***@gmail.comThe proof of God is that atheists have to lieto themselves and others...What God is doing: Look at a pendulum swing.

________Why prove a God caused it to swing rather than the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun.

God created everything, including the laws of physics.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

the dukester, American-American

*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Religion is better than science.Religion; if it is worth its salt;is self examining...while sciencelooks not to the inside for itselfbut outside for its so called good...God creates gravity.Mitchell Raemsch

Religion is better than science.Religion; if it is worth its salt;is self examining...while sciencelooks not to the inside for itselfbut outside for its so called good...God creates gravity.Mitchell Raemsch

science taught god how

The order science discovers beganbefore his mind. There is orderbefore mans mind. But no order beforeGod...

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by m***@gmail.comTo see what God is doing watch a pendulum swing.He is pushing the pendulum as He sustains it togetherwith the rest of the universe...

Ya, and you also see it sitting by the river banks directing the flow of water, lying in the cloud making rain to flood the land, sleep deep in the earth core pushing tetonic plates to create earth quakes....but it has wasted all its time in those dreadful events while ignoring your prayers!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

It did not create an anti-gravity which will take you to the moon.....

The only anti gravity is round motion's weight...

Are you conceding that there is no pixie in place to create anti-gravity????

Just the opposite. God does not like anti-gravity.

God sustains anti gravity...

Whatever this means....you still cannot float freely because there is no pixie!

Haahaahaa. Snake is too stupid to grok either side.the dukester, American-American*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

Post by dukeI fully understand how people as dumb as you are don't get it.

OK, I want to get it...why do you lie so blatantly?????????????

No, you don't which is why your won't.

Surely you can enlighten me as to why you need to lie daily..........

Name one lie, uneducated boy.

You are one of the well known liars in our forum.....

Post by dukethe dukester, American-American*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

And that was a perfect example.

Any theist who talks at us as if his deluded fantasies were factbefore he has proved them, when he knows we don't believe them in thefirst place, is a deliberately rude, deliberately stupid, deliberateliar.

Post by GreywolfWhat's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a God created gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheists thanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?

Or you to disprove.

I'm not the one who's claiming God is real. You're the liar doing that. So prove it or just shut the fuck up.

It did not create an anti-gravity which will take you to the moon.....

God left a precept, your not to travel away from here the earth. Yes,it is a mortal sin to do so. You are not to leave the seasons of theearth. His Bible says so. And no, making fake seasons to bring withyou, are not the same seasons. That is what is wrong with no gravity.After the ass hole freemason sinned going into outer space to the spacestation NASA for 6 months, he is dying yes, which is what God does tothem for all the sinning. Yes, they shrink, loose their eye sight, anddie, at least 3 inches a day, and grow backwards instead of staying aman. The pendulum works differently on other planets, so it swing isincreased or decreased, depending on the magnetics of the poles.Gravity, happens from the magnetics created and, its a fact, they arenot just in one place on the earths surface and beneath, they are alsoin the elements.

Post by m***@gmail.comThe proof of God is that atheists have to lieto themselves and others...What God is doing: Look at a pendulum swing.

________Why prove a God caused it to swing rather than the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun.

God created everything, including the laws of physics.

Prove the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun didn't.

You're welcome to worship whatever you wish.'

And so are you. But not in an atheist forum, you jerk.

You've admitted you can't prove God actually exists. Then why think the atheist has to *disprove* His existence? Explain the rationale for that.

Show us any proof that your three Christian Gods are any more real than the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun. That being the case, don't you think you should quit flappin' your yappers about a set of Beings you cannot even HOPE to prove real?

What do you actually think you're accomplishing by just bleating out that God is gonna do this, or God's gonna do that. Or God is Love, but He's going to send you to Hell when you have absolutely no proof whatever that "God" even exists?

Just posting to be a complete dick and a half, are you? My, how "Christian" of you.

the dukester, American Who Fails to Have the Intelligence to NOT Proselytize In an Atheist Forum. And Who's Not Even Really a Christian

that pompass ass duke NOVUS ORDO could not give you proof.CAUSE LOOK AT WHAT HE SAID. He breaks the very first commandmentof My God.

Your not welcome to worship whatever you wish ass hole.We the true Catholic Church say so. And yes,we are to kill you if you do not comply, if it isnecessary. Truth of the Declaration of Independence.And that is exactly why, David killed Goliath

But you say, there is no such thing as a giant. (USA)And yet they already showed you proof of that.That there really was is. Same as, many other archeology findsprove that My true God exists. And that His real books, did not lie.Especially, with what the Biblehad written 2000 years ago, and what is up in the sky today. Thatseveral astronomers do know about. Not just one. There is more proofof God than you can shake a stick at. And yet, you liars, still claimthere is not. So dam what. God said you God haters would be here, andI for one believe Him. Not because you are, but Because He said so.

Post by m***@gmail.comThe proof of God is that atheists have to lieto themselves and others...What God is doing: Look at a pendulum swing.

________Why prove a God caused it to swing rather than the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun.

God created everything, including the laws of physics.

Prove the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun didn't.

You're welcome to worship whatever you wish.'

And so are you. But not in an atheist forum, you jerk.You've admitted you can't prove God actually exists. Then why think the atheist has to *disprove* His existence? Explain the rationale for that.Show us any proof that your three Christian Gods are any more real than the Eternal Son of an Eternal Leprechaun. That being the case, don't you think you should quit flappin' your yappers about a set of Beings you cannot even HOPE to prove real?What do you actually think you're accomplishing by just bleating out that God is gonna do this, or God's gonna do that. Or God is Love, but He's going to send you to Hell when you have absolutely no proof whatever that "God" even exists?Just posting to be a complete dick and a half, are you? My, how "Christian" of you.

the dukester, American Who Fails to Have the Intelligence to NOT Proselytize In an Atheist Forum. And Who's Not Even Really a Christian

Post by tesla sTinkerthat pompass ass duke NOVUS ORDO could not give you proof.CAUSE LOOK AT WHAT HE SAID. He breaks the very first commandmentof My God.Your not welcome to worship whatever you wish ass hole.We the true Catholic Church say so.

What mystery tells you that you're the true CC?

Post by tesla sTinkerAnd yes,we are to kill you if you do not comply, if it isnecessary. Truth of the Declaration of Independence.And that is exactly why, David killed Goliath

Thus you are neither Christian nor Catholic.

the dukester, American-American

*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

Interesting comment.As you may well know, when it comes to the four fundamental forces in the Universe, Gravity is not only the weakest,but the most elusive. Physicists are still scrambling to understand it.

However, although elusive it is still the force that keeps everything in "PLACE."MY question is, "Where did Gravity come from?"

Post by Jamie SouleInteresting comment.As you may well know, when it comes to the four fundamental forces in the Universe, Gravity is not only the weakest,but the most elusive. Physicists are still scrambling to understand it.However, although elusive it is still the force that keeps everything in "PLACE."MY question is, "Where did Gravity come from?"

Ask physicists, not atheists, where gravity "came from", but we knowthat you think an unknown, a "we don't yet know", is "proof" of a god.

For alt.atheism, ask where a [hiding/invisible/unevidenced] god "came from".

--There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.Atheist: anyone who says "I don't buy the claim 'a god exists'".Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.Sycophant: a compulsive ass-kisser of un-evidenced dictator god.Christian - a person afraid of a hiding apparently imaginary god.

Post by Jamie SouleInteresting comment.As you may well know, when it comes to the four fundamental forces in the Universe, Gravity is not only the weakest,but the most elusive. Physicists are still scrambling to understand it.However, although elusive it is still the force that keeps everything in "PLACE."MY question is, "Where did Gravity come from?"

Ask physicists, not atheists, where gravity "came from", but we knowthat you think an unknown, a "we don't yet know", is "proof" of a god.For alt.atheism, ask where a [hiding/invisible/unevidenced] god "came from".

Man will never come to that knowledge.

the dukester, American-American

*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

Post by Jamie SouleInteresting comment.As you may well know, when it comes to the four fundamental forces in the Universe, Gravity is not only the weakest,but the most elusive. Physicists are still scrambling to understand it.However, although elusive it is still the force that keeps everything in "PLACE."MY question is, "Where did Gravity come from?"

Ask physicists, not atheists, where gravity "came from", but we knowthat you think an unknown, a "we don't yet know", is "proof" of a god.For alt.atheism, ask where a [hiding/invisible/unevidenced] god "came from".

Man will never come to that knowledge.

Why can't your [imaginary] god just tell us?

--There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.Atheist: anyone who says "I don't buy the claim 'a god exists'".Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.Sycophant: a compulsive ass-kisser of un-evidenced dictator god.Christian - a person afraid of a hiding apparently imaginary god.

Unless you _quote_ the comment to which you are responding, peoplewill not know what you are talking about. You complain about our lackof politeness, yet respond impolitely. Do you see the problem withthis?

Unless you _quote_ the comment to which you are responding, peoplewill not know what you are talking about. You complain about our lackof politeness, yet respond impolitely. Do you see the problem withthis?

The thread was started by a braindead theist moron***@gmail.com who wrote...

"The proof of God is that atheists have to lie to themselves andothers...

What God is doing: Look at a pendulum swing."

Greywolf responded with....

"Why prove a God caused it to swing rather than the Eternal Son ofan Eternal Leprechaun.

What's that? *I* would have to prove that? Fine. Then prove a Godcreated gravity. Until you do, we'll remain skeptical atheiststhanks to your lack of proof for your religious beliefs.

Shouldn't be too hard for you to prove, should it?"

The Jamie-loonie's response was....

"Interesting comment.As you may well know, when it comes to the four fundamental forcesin the Universe, Gravity is not only the weakest,but the mostelusive. Physicists are still scrambling to understand it.

We'll have to invent a new word - "fundisplaining".

However, although elusive it is still the force that keepseverything in "PLACE."MY question is, "Where did Gravity come from?"

As usual, it's question intended to elicit a "we don't know" answer sohe can say it was an unjustified, unevidenced, imaginary magicalsuperbeing.

Post by Jamie SouleI can't believe what I just read.How fucking old are you? Ten or twelve, because that is the type of answer I would expect from someone that age.Really?You reduce yourself to name calling as a response to my post? Seriously, is that all you have? If so, my sympathies.Now, had you bothered to research what I said before you made your silly ass comment you would have discovered this.I am in no way trying to speak over someone's head, and I am surely not speaking about some "PHANTOM" unproven theory. This is not "ROCKET SCIENCE," and is easily looked up if you took the time.There are four fundamental forces in the Universe. The weak Nuclear Force, the Strong Nuclear Force, the Electrocmagnetic Force, and Gravity, and gravity is the weakest out of all of them.So, what in your mind leads you to the conclusion that because I state fact, it becomes an opportunity for you to demean me??

You reduce yourself to name calling as a response to my post? Seriously,is that all you have? If so, my sympathies.

Post by Jamie SouleNow, had you bothered to research what I said before you made yoursilly ass comment you would have discovered this.

Post by Jamie SouleI am in no way trying to speak over someone's head, and I am surelynot speaking about some "PHANTOM" unproven theory. This is not "ROCKETSCIENCE," and is easily looked up if you took the time.

There are four fundamental forces in the Universe. The weak NuclearForce, the Strong Nuclear Force, the Electrocmagnetic Force, andGravity, and gravity is the weakest out of all of them.So, what in your mind leads you to the conclusion that because I statefact, it becomes an opportunity for you to demean me??

Post by Jamie SouleI am in no way trying to speak over someone's head, and I am surelynot speaking about some "PHANTOM" unproven theory. This is not "ROCKETSCIENCE," and is easily looked up if you took the time.

Post by Jamie SouleThere are four fundamental forces in the Universe. The weak NuclearForce, the Strong Nuclear Force, the Electrocmagnetic Force, andGravity, and gravity is the weakest out of all of them.So, what in your mind leads you to the conclusion that because I statefact, it becomes an opportunity for you to demean me??

Idiot.

Like I said... "fundiesplaining".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggs

Teaching grandmother to suck eggs is an English language sayingmeaning that a person is giving advice to someone else about a subjectof which they are already familiar (and probably more so than thefirst person).[1]

Post by Christopher A. LeeLike I said... "fundiesplaining".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggsTeaching grandmother to suck eggs is an English language sayingmeaning that a person is giving advice to someone else about a subjectof which they are already familiar (and probably more so than thefirst person).[1]It's all too common in the stupids we get here.

I have no idea how well, or bad, my grandmothers sucked eggs, however I doknow that in my family it would have been “teaching grandma how to chop offa chickens head.” She was really good at doing that. On the other hand Inever was good at it. Of course there was my “aunt” Mabel, now she couldhave easily taught my grandmother how to shorten a chicken (she and herhusband weren’t actually relatives, they were neighbors of my mother,fellow farmers on adjoining farms. Mom spent a lot of time with them and cameto think of them as aunt and uncle, my sister and I spent a number of summerswith them and loved the heck out of them.)

Back to the chickens. One day my sister and I were out in the yard and thebantam rooster decided that we needed to get out of its area, so it chasedboth of us up a tree. This was a MEAN bird, after this I never had a problemwith the idea that birds were dinosaurs. So aunt Mabel came out to see whatall the yelling was about. When she saw what was going on she startedlaughing and tried to shoo the bird away from the tree...

at which point the stupid bird decided that she was his new target and chasedher up the tree. Shortly after uncle Jake came back to the house for lunch,he had been out working elsewhere on the farm. Unlike aunt Mabel he was notwearing a dress so his legs were pretty well protected and the rooster foundhimself overruled on just whose yard it was.

Mabel was so mad when she got out of that tree that she told Jake to findanother rooster because THAT ONE was supper. And so it was. Quite tasty.Mabel took him out like a mob hitman, gave him some tasty grain, waited untilit got close and grabbed it, turned to the nearby stump, picket up the axe,and WHACK! It hardly saw it coming.

Jake made a trade with a neighbor for a young rooster and it was taught justwho was the boss, it must have learned its lesson as it was still there acouple of years later and no one got chased up a tree.

Post by Christopher A. LeeLike I said... "fundiesplaining".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggsTeaching grandmother to suck eggs is an English language sayingmeaning that a person is giving advice to someone else about a subjectof which they are already familiar (and probably more so than thefirst person).[1]It's all too common in the stupids we get here.

I have no idea how well, or bad, my grandmothers sucked eggs, however I doknow that in my family it would have been teaching grandma how to chop offa chickens head. She was really good at doing that. On the other hand Inever was good at it. Of course there was my aunt Mabel, now she couldhave easily taught my grandmother how to shorten a chicken (she and herhusband werent actually relatives, they were neighbors of my mother,fellow farmers on adjoining farms. Mom spent a lot of time with them and cameto think of them as aunt and uncle, my sister and I spent a number of summerswith them and loved the heck out of them.)Back to the chickens. One day my sister and I were out in the yard and thebantam rooster decided that we needed to get out of its area, so it chasedboth of us up a tree. This was a MEAN bird, after this I never had a problemwith the idea that birds were dinosaurs. So aunt Mabel came out to see whatall the yelling was about. When she saw what was going on she startedlaughing and tried to shoo the bird away from the tree...at which point the stupid bird decided that she was his new target and chasedher up the tree. Shortly after uncle Jake came back to the house for lunch,he had been out working elsewhere on the farm. Unlike aunt Mabel he was notwearing a dress so his legs were pretty well protected and the rooster foundhimself overruled on just whose yard it was.Mabel was so mad when she got out of that tree that she told Jake to findanother rooster because THAT ONE was supper. And so it was. Quite tasty.Mabel took him out like a mob hitman, gave him some tasty grain, waited untilit got close and grabbed it, turned to the nearby stump, picket up the axe,and WHACK! It hardly saw it coming.Jake made a trade with a neighbor for a young rooster and it was taught justwho was the boss, it must have learned its lesson as it was still there acouple of years later and no one got chased up a tree.

Post by Christopher A. LeeLike I said... "fundiesplaining".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggsTeaching grandmother to suck eggs is an English language sayingmeaning that a person is giving advice to someone else about a subjectof which they are already familiar (and probably more so than thefirst person).[1]It's all too common in the stupids we get here.

I have no idea how well, or bad, my grandmothers sucked eggs, however I doknow that in my family it would have been “teaching grandma how to chop offa chickens head.” She was really good at doing that. On the other hand Inever was good at it. Of course there was my “aunt” Mabel, now she couldhave easily taught my grandmother how to shorten a chicken (she and herhusband weren’t actually relatives, they were neighbors of my mother,fellow farmers on adjoining farms. Mom spent a lot of time with them and cameto think of them as aunt and uncle, my sister and I spent a number of summerswith them and loved the heck out of them.)Back to the chickens. One day my sister and I were out in the yard and thebantam rooster decided that we needed to get out of its area, so it chasedboth of us up a tree. This was a MEAN bird, after this I never had a problemwith the idea that birds were dinosaurs. So aunt Mabel came out to see whatall the yelling was about. When she saw what was going on she startedlaughing and tried to shoo the bird away from the tree...at which point the stupid bird decided that she was his new target and chasedher up the tree. Shortly after uncle Jake came back to the house for lunch,he had been out working elsewhere on the farm. Unlike aunt Mabel he was notwearing a dress so his legs were pretty well protected and the rooster foundhimself overruled on just whose yard it was.Mabel was so mad when she got out of that tree that she told Jake to findanother rooster because THAT ONE was supper. And so it was. Quite tasty.Mabel took him out like a mob hitman, gave him some tasty grain, waited untilit got close and grabbed it, turned to the nearby stump, picket up the axe,and WHACK! It hardly saw it coming.Jake made a trade with a neighbor for a young rooster and it was taught justwho was the boss, it must have learned its lesson as it was still there acouple of years later and no one got chased up a tree.

Good story.

Damned right it is, how many kids these days have ever been chased up a treeby a chicken? Or had a 60+ year old aunt also chased up the same tree by thesame chicken?

I was talking to my sister just the day before I posted the story andhappened to think of this story and mentioned it to her. I had barely gotten“Hey, do you remember when we were at Mabel and Jakes farm and that ...”before she started laughing. I don’t think I have spoken about that withher in at least 45 or 48 years. The fame of that stupid bantam rooster haslong out-lived its life. Not that many have been told of this story, but italways gets a good laugh when I do bring it up.

Now between my sister and myself we may have slightly different memories ofexactly who or what happened in some minor details. I remember that she waschased up the tree first, then I, then Mabel. I think she remembers that Iwas first then her. But either way there was only about a minute between thefirst two up the tree. And of course this was when I was 8 or 9, my sisterwould have been a year younger. Damn, that means this happened 58 years agoat least. Sheesh, time flies when you are busy having fun.

Post by Christopher A. LeeLike I said... "fundiesplaining".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggsTeaching grandmother to suck eggs is an English language sayingmeaning that a person is giving advice to someone else about a subjectof which they are already familiar (and probably more so than thefirst person).[1]It's all too common in the stupids we get here.

I have no idea how well, or bad, my grandmothers sucked eggs, however I doknow that in my family it would have been teaching grandma how to chop offa chickens head. She was really good at doing that. On the other hand Inever was good at it. Of course there was my aunt Mabel, now she couldhave easily taught my grandmother how to shorten a chicken (she and herhusband werent actually relatives, they were neighbors of my mother,fellow farmers on adjoining farms. Mom spent a lot of time with them and cameto think of them as aunt and uncle, my sister and I spent a number of summerswith them and loved the heck out of them.)

When and where I grew up, addressing adult friends of the family as"Uncle" an "Aunt" was standard usage for kid. When another kid saidUncle Henry and Aunt Jane were coming to dinner, we never troubled ourlittle heads about genetic relationships--it was all good, and on thewest coast few of us had any blood relations around anyway. It was awarmly human state of affairs, and if it has ceased to be, I feelsorry for kids now.

Post by hleopoldJake made a trade with a neighbor for a young rooster and it was taught justwho was the boss, it must have learned its lesson as it was still there acouple of years later and no one got chased up a tree.

Perhaps your Aunt Mabel left his predecessor's head near the stump asa gentle reminder about proper behavior.

Post by hleopoldJake made a trade with a neighbor for a young rooster and it was taught justwho was the boss, it must have learned its lesson as it was still there acouple of years later and no one got chased up a tree.

Perhaps your Aunt Mabel left his predecessor's head near the stump asa gentle reminder about proper behavior.

If she had the various farm cats or one of the local coyotes would havefinished it off in no time.

Post by Christopher A. LeeLike I said... "fundiesplaining".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggsTeaching grandmother to suck eggs is an English language sayingmeaning that a person is giving advice to someone else about a subjectof which they are already familiar (and probably more so than thefirst person).[1]It's all too common in the stupids we get here.

I have no idea how well, or bad, my grandmothers sucked eggs, however I doknow that in my family it would have been “teaching grandma how to chop offa chickens head.” She was really good at doing that. On the other hand Inever was good at it. Of course there was my “aunt” Mabel, now she couldhave easily taught my grandmother how to shorten a chicken (she and herhusband weren’t actually relatives, they were neighbors of my mother,fellow farmers on adjoining farms. Mom spent a lot of time with them and cameto think of them as aunt and uncle, my sister and I spent a number of summerswith them and loved the heck out of them.)Back to the chickens. One day my sister and I were out in the yard and thebantam rooster decided that we needed to get out of its area, so it chasedboth of us up a tree. This was a MEAN bird, after this I never had a problemwith the idea that birds were dinosaurs. So aunt Mabel came out to see whatall the yelling was about. When she saw what was going on she startedlaughing and tried to shoo the bird away from the tree...at which point the stupid bird decided that she was his new target and chasedher up the tree. Shortly after uncle Jake came back to the house for lunch,he had been out working elsewhere on the farm. Unlike aunt Mabel he was notwearing a dress so his legs were pretty well protected and the rooster foundhimself overruled on just whose yard it was.Mabel was so mad when she got out of that tree that she told Jake to findanother rooster because THAT ONE was supper. And so it was. Quite tasty.Mabel took him out like a mob hitman, gave him some tasty grain, waited untilit got close and grabbed it, turned to the nearby stump, picket up the axe,and WHACK! It hardly saw it coming.Jake made a trade with a neighbor for a young rooster and it was taught justwho was the boss, it must have learned its lesson as it was still there acouple of years later and no one got chased up a tree.

Oh, drat! I thought Jake was going to get chased up the tree, too, and anyone else who tried to help. Now, that would have been funny. I could picture thatrooster with his wings on his hips, marching around the tree and crowing.Animation by Fritz Freleng.

Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.Gravity - WikipediaWikipedia › wiki › Gravity

Post by Cloud HobbitGravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.Gravity - WikipediaWikipedia › wiki › Gravity

Post by Cloud HobbitGravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity(proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as aforce, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by theuneven distribution of mass.Gravity - WikipediaWikipedia › wiki › Gravity

Post by Cloud HobbitGravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity(proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as aforce, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by theuneven distribution of mass.Gravity - WikipediaWikipedia › wiki › Gravity

Post by Cloud HobbitGravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.Gravity - WikipediaWikipedia  wiki  Gravity

Thanks be to God to set it up that way.

the dukester, American-American

*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

Post by Cloud HobbitGravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity (proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915) which describes gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.Gravity - WikipediaWikipedia › wiki › Gravity

Thanks be to God to set it up that way.

If I have three things, and add two more things to them, do I need Godto set it up so I have five things, and not four things or six things?

Unless you _quote_ the comment to which you are responding, peoplewill not know what you are talking about. You complain about our lackof politeness, yet respond impolitely. Do you see the problem withthis?

Newbies eventually learn.

the dukester, American-American

*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

Post by Jamie SouleInteresting comment.As you may well know, when it comes to the four fundamental forces in the Universe, Gravity is not only the weakest,but the most elusive. Physicists are still scrambling to understand it.However, although elusive it is still the force that keeps everything in "PLACE."MY question is, "Where did Gravity come from?"

God specified it. Why should 2 masses attract rather than repel each other?.

the dukester, American-American

*****The Purpose of the NT Word of God is not to inform as it did inthe OT,but instead to form us in the very image of Jesus Christ.*****

LeBorkLeBork% <%> wrote:LeBork> On 2018-12-15 7:39 a.m., Oscar wrote:LeBork>> Jamie Soule <***@gmail.com> wrote:LeBork>>> Since Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces in theLeBork>>> Universe, yet is responsible for creating implicit order. May I politelyLeBork>>> ask where Gravity came fromLeBork>>>> IIRC, it was Persent and Lamey teh Cable Guy who invented it around 15LeBork>> years ago, but it didn't turn out exactly the way they expected.LeBork> it was lamey's fault , i wrote , " fucked " , he thought i wrote , suckedLeBork> " and that's gravity , the earth " sucks "LeBorkLeBorkLeBorkThanks for explaining that, dude. It would have been so much better ifLeBorkLamey hadn't misheard you. *sigh*

Post by CheckmateWarning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts byCheckmate! In article <218312064566579342.222771sam-LeBorkLeBork>>> Since Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces in theLeBork>>> Universe, yet is responsible for creating implicit order. May I politelyLeBork>>> ask where Gravity came fromLeBork>>>> IIRC, it was Persent and Lamey teh Cable Guy who invented it around 15LeBork>> years ago, but it didn't turn out exactly the way they expected.LeBork> it was lamey's fault , i wrote , " fucked " , he thought i wrote , suckedLeBork> " and that's gravity , the earth " sucks "LeBorkLeBorkLeBorkThanks for explaining that, dude. It would have been so much better ifLeBorkLamey hadn't misheard you. *sigh*These sort of unfortunate mishaps inevitably happen.