"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com > wrote in message news:... > <Mike from Ottawa> wrote in message > news:nf425317coqu6sb4lrut8aepqt6d9jfc0l@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 20 May 2007 17:20:44 -0400, "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" >> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >>>>> Told ya you'd be denying your own words. >>>> >>>> You spouted a lot of crap, but that's not unusual. You whined because >>>> I didn't care if you outed John or not. I then got tired of your >>>> whining and said go ahead and prove it. After all your whining, you >>>> said no. You weaselled out. Again. You can only ride so far on your >>>> hot air. Sliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide. >>> >>> Talk about twisting and delusions. >> >> Yes, you certainly do have a bagful. >> >>> I said "no" on the second or third relevant post to Futile John, didn't >>> I? >> >> Nope, you said "no" after whining because I said it was between you >> and John and I didn't want to play your stupid game. > > So put some money on it, say, 1000 bucks?

>>> You said "no" on your very first (but already posted today that you >>> don't >>>remember it...;-)). >> >> Yup, I said "no." What part of "no" don't you understand? > > Yeah, you shanked Futile John right off, we all understood it just fine, > and I've quoted it a dozen times now. > >> And don't use Dennis' smileys -- he has them patented. >> >>> -Then-, YOU started whining, waffling, backpedaling. >> >> Not at all. You tried to turn it into something else. Man, you're >> always accusing everyone else of the same things you do. > > In your -own- words, just as with your boy Futile John: > > ========================== > <Mike from Ottawa> wrote in message > news:bepc43hl9v5ufnrb5brqip70n6fmgshmvr@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 12 May 2007 17:57:35 -0400, "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" >> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: > >>>> Some of the clan here keep thinking that you're (Futile John Francis) >>>> trying to take their >>>> guns, erase their 2nd amendment, crush their rights, etc, etc. I just >>>> see you trying to understand the "why" and getting no answers but a >>>> lot of abuse. >>> >>> Well, Mikey, you're wrong. >>> >>> I'll prove it. >>> >>> Will you be man enough to admit it? >>> >>> That's a "yes or no" question. >> >> That'd be a "no," then. I don't think you're man enough to produce >> real evidence of anything, you have a hate-on for John, and I really >> don't care what your issues are with him. > > I can't do any better than you refuting your own statement and > credibility. > > Thanks for doing all the work. > ====================== > > No one turning anything there, but you turning a shank.

>>> Your "Again" statement is also a lie, A Futile John Francis type filthy >>>innuendo lie. >> >> What a bag of crap. But it's OK, I'm used to it from you. >> >>> I challenge you to prove it. >> >> Prove what? "Again?" Yes, it's definitely an English word. Thanks >> for playing. > > Slllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddddeeeee. > > You lied. > > You slide. > > Everybody sees the lie, the twist, the innuendo, the slide. > > It's the Futile John trademark, like a worn out party favor. > >>> Care to bet some money on that? > > Ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

>>> We know Futile John won't. >>> >>> That's where he told his "buying the pot" lie, because he was too cheap >>> to >>>pony up. >>> >>> Here's a post where you are telling a bold and bare lie before God and >>> the >>>world, just like Futile John Francis does. >> >> You are such an incredible joke and you don't mind magnifying the >> fact. Maybe you should think about toning it down a bit. > > Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss > >>> No one is twisting, no one is chanting and repeating half truth till >>> they >>>become urban legend. >> >> You always do, but I'm beginning to think there's not even a quarter >> truth to anything you say. Everyone else is a liar except you, and >> that really is such a boring repetitive phrase, always uttered without >> proof, apart from your cackling clan. >> >> It always goes in the same old spiral -- you make some BS accusation, >> rant and rave for a while, Scotty joins in on the chorus, and then you >> tell your antagonist that he's a liar and that you have proof. >> >> It's high time you developed a new story line. Maybe call everyone a >> liar but you're holding back on revealing the "big proof," wait for >> Scotty to rant, then make some BS accusation. > > I caught you red handed, and now all you can do is shovel vitriol as the > ship goes down. > >>> You just fully and intentionally lied before the house. >>> >>> Its an irrefutable lie. >> >> My, your entertainment value is dropping. So much BS, over and over >> again. > > You're the repetitive one, my friend, not me. > > " I really don't care, but, I really don't care, but, I really don't care, > but," > >>> "After all your whining, you said no. You weaselled out. Again." -MfO >> >> Yup, you did. You begged for the chance to prove John a liar. > > I've proved Futile John a liar two score times, just like I did you. > > No one has to beg to do it. > > They need only wait. > > Let's see -your- version of begging one more time, for the -20th- time: > > =================================== > <Mike from Ottawa> wrote in message > news:bepc43hl9v5ufnrb5brqip70n6fmgshmvr@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 12 May 2007 17:57:35 -0400, "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" >> <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: >> >>>> Some of the clan here keep thinking that you're (Futile John Francis) >>>> trying to take their >>>> guns, erase their 2nd amendment, crush their rights, etc, etc. I just >>>> see you trying to understand the "why" and getting no answers but a >>>> lot of abuse. >>> >>> Well, Mikey, you're wrong. >>> >>> I'll prove it. >>> >>> Will you be man enough to admit it? >>> >>> That's a "yes or no" question. >> >> That'd be a "no," then. I don't think you're man enough to produce >> real evidence of anything, you have a hate-on for John, and I really >> don't care what your issues are with him. > > I can't do any better than you refuting your own statement and > credibility. > > Thanks for doing all the work. > > ========================= > > "You begged for the chance to prove John a liar". > > So... > > Was that "begging", or were you.. > > Lying?

Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Typical- evidence IN YOUR OWN WORDS.

Not commented on.

But wait?

Was all this SNIPPED from the reply, Yesman?

You know, <snip >ped?

We'll check tomorrow and see.

But we see you don't comment on seeing your own words, and, you SURE AS SHIT don't put that Canadian money where your mouth is.

> Hmm. > >>John wanted to see it, and I got tired of your whining and told you to go >> ahead and prove it. You said you don't have to prove bupkus. What >> are you, a god in your own mind? > > No, that's a twisted delusion. > > I told Futile John -No-, as he has long established a pattern of refusing > to provide information of any kind, and besides, he has seen the > evidence -many- times. > > -After- your documented shanking, I told -you- there was -no use- showing > it to you, because you plainly and clearly stated that you would not be > man enough to admit you were wrong even if you were. > > Shall we review that a third time? > >>> Well, Mikey, you're wrong. >>> >>> I'll prove it. >>> >>> Will you be man enough to admit it? >>> >>> That's a "yes or no" question. >> >> That'd be a "no," then. -MfO > > I also stated that had really not come as a shock to anyone here at > Rec.scuba. > > Further, this post is excellent evidence of who -really- twists words and > lies, and has delusions. > > I quote it, I prove it, I show it in your own words. > > You and Futile John just chant it over and over and over, in complete > moral and intellectual bankruptcy. > > Not one scrap of proof from you two, not ever. > > Just more accusation and slimy innuendo. > >>> And you're a piece of shit liar. >> >> I'll take that as a Scottyism. In fact, it's getting tougher which >> one of you is writing these rants. > > He can't help being right. > >>> And I still have the proof, readily available to any third party who >>>wishes to see it. > > <snip whining about my white hooded clan> > >> You smoking BC bud? Must be. Apparently it's quite powerful. > > Apparently you know what that means from personal experience, but I don't > smoke anything. > -- > > Popeye > "After all your whining, you said no. > You weaselled out. Again." -MfO > www.finalprotectivefire.com >