As a Pakistani and an academic, I'm tired of the lack of nuance in discussions like this and of constantly having to tell people that gross generalisations, sweeping statements, and titillating pictures, don't make the argument any more solid or acceptable, even when the author is a local.

The most astounding characteristic of Eltahawy's piece is that it ignores one of the very first lessons that students of Orientalism are or should be familiar with. There's a simple exercise I use in one of my segments on women and religion in my courses. When we get to a discussion of Islam and Muslim women, I ask my students to fill in the blank for me: "Muslim women are ____ ". The students come up with many responses and all immediate. Now I ask them to imagine if I had asked them to finish this sentence: "Christian women are ____." And they look utterly confused.

What country am I talking about? What race? What kind of Christian? Are they evangelical? In short, they realise that the category of Christian woman is meaningless unless you have further specific details.

We accord complexity, diversity, and nuance to our understanding of other religions, but when it comes to Islam it all seems to be painted with one big brush stroke and usually in the colour black. That Eltahawy talks about "women in the Middle East" as one large, undifferentiated group, and in the same paragraph talks about women being "covered up, anchored to the home, denied the simple mobility of getting into their own cars, forced to get permission from men to travel, and unable to marry without a male guardian's blessing – or divorce either", gives the impression that the above rules apply to every woman, in every country in the Middle East.

That is, of course, not true. This is the kind of sloppy and sensationalistic journalism that has made the work of academics who study and teach about the region much more difficult.

As an academic and teacher, I'm also tired of the stifling opposition between cultural relativism and universalism. Each position, if adhered to staunchly, is problematic. Using these labels quickly undermines someone's position without engaging in the particularities of their argument. If you believe in universal rights you're ethnocentric or imperialistic; if you believe in cultural relativism you are willing to excuse all kinds of abuses and oppression. We leave no possibility for complexity: that it is possible to criticise without being a ethnocentric and it is possible to ask for context without being an apologist.

The idea that political correctness, as Eltahawy says, prevents people from criticising Muslim countries is dangerous since it encourages an all out, unapologetic attack on Muslims. Islamophobia is alive and well and you don't have to go very far before you run into it.

On my first day volunteering in my daughter's first grade class, a boy told me "people from Pakistan kill other people" and that they "drop bombs". When a six year old has absorbed these messages about Muslims, a call for an unleashing of sorts is the last thing we need to be doing. And journalism, like Eltahawy's recent piece, make academic considerations of the issue more urgent and more necessary than ever.

I'm resentful of having to continually respond to sensationalistic and over-simplified analysis. I'm not alone in this. Any academic, who belongs to a stigmatised minority has to deal with the issues of balancing criticism while not further reinforcing damaging stereotypes in the larger culture about "us". We realise that there are different layers of oppression and we can't focus on one kind alone (gender, for instance) while ignoring, or worse, reinforcing, another kind (racial, for instance).

Jobs of the week

The deadline for entering this year's Guardian University Awards is Monday 26 January

To showcase the outstanding work undertaken by UK universities, we've introduced four new categories for 2015

Ensure your team gets the recognition it deserves, share your successes with us today

About Guardian Professional

Guardian Professional Networks are community-focused sites, where we bring together advice, best practice and insight from a wide range of professional communities.
Click here for details of all our networks. Some of our specialist hubs within these sites are supported by funding from external companies and organisations. All editorial content is independent of any sponsorship, unless otherwise clearly stated. We make Partner Zones available for sponsors' own content. Guardian Professional is a division of Guardian News & Media.