02 November 2018

Copy, paste and spread this far and wide, if for no other reason than to give the bird to those who would censor us.

I attempted to respond to #MatthewDowd’s op-ed piece in ABC News ,
online, but for some reason, they kept deleting all my comments. I
have no doubt that this was because I was stating facts that proved his
piece ridiculous in every way. I posted comments complaining about the
deletion and they deleted those as well. Thus, it was clearly not a
matter of length or spam or even ‘too many links’, etc. They simply
didn’t like the content. Thus, I have no recourse but to write my own
article and link to theirs. #MatthewDowd states, in his op-ed,
‘Is he [Trump] responsible for
fomenting coarseness, tribalism and hatred in our political discourse
that seems to have emboldened the most radical of these white
supremacists? Absolutely.”
#MatthewDowd, you base this incredible conclusion on a slippery slope
argument, minus any actual ‘facts’ other than what you simply state as
true in this ridiculous op ed. You claim that ‘white supremacists’ cheer
Trump on with all his policies- proof? Who, when and where? Names and
dates? Organizations? Just because individuals go to a Trump rally and
also happen to espouse white supremacist values doesn’t mean that Trump
created those values in that individual. They had those values before
they came to his rally. Also, it doesn’t necessarily follow that just
because they like Trump, that Trump agrees or is sympathetic toward
their ideas. Nor does it follow that because they like Trump’s ideas
that their ideas are aligned in any way. Their ideas can simply
intersect in a small way that is acceptable to the insane person. By no
means does that small intersection then mean that Trump is espousing
white supremacist values or supporting white supremacy in any way.
White supremacy is a mental and spiritual illness. It’s not rational.
But it must find a home in a political platform- just as socialist
dictatorship must find a home. Socialist dictatorships will find their
homes in the Liberal Democratic party. Does that automatically follow
that every Democrat with insane Mussolini types in the crowd are now
automatically Mussolini? No. But you knew that before you wrote this
piece. Or, if you didn’t, then you shouldn’t be writing for ABC.
Furthermore, you state that Trump should apologize. This implies
that Trump is now responsible for the recent spate of shootings- ie, the
recent shooting at the Jewish synagogue. You are a hypocrite, because
within this same soppy op ed, you predictably stand up for Islam. You
claim that,‘In
fact, the greatest number of acts of terror over that time has not been
by radical Islam, or immigrants or refugees, or antifa, but by white
supremacists.’
There are several things wrong with this remarkable claim but let’s
address them one by one. First, the common liberal notion behind your
protection of Islam is that while some ‘fringe elements of peaceful
Islam have ‘hijacked’ Islam and thrown acid on women’s faces, cut off
women’s private parts, blown up the trade towers, murdered thousands of
Americans, shot up gay night clubs, shot up our military bases, shot up
their office workers, beheaded people in N.J., and performed honor
killings here- all in the name of Allah.. they don’t represent the ‘true
religion’ of Islam and thus, you can’t blame Islam, correct? And yet, you turn right around in this lazy, illogical piece and say,“The best leaders at times like this give people a sense of hope and a vision of the promised land. They are unifying and don’t look for enemies or particular demographic groups to blame.They
appeal to inherent values we all feel and want in this world by hopeful
language and policy guided by reality and not false promises.”
You dare to tell Trump not to blame the news or Obama or the
Democrats or even the individual who shot up the synagogue for the
crimes that are committed. You don’t blame Islam for the individuals
who murder in its name. Yet, YOU blame the entire hate group, white
supremacists, for ONE man’s actions. Even though neither the Aryan
nation, nor any other white supremacist group has claimed responsibility
for any of the shootings done by any of the killers who killed anyone
under Trump’s’ presidency!!! Even though ISLAM and the religious groups
that serve it PROUDLY claim responsibility for ALL the killings done by
its followers who scream, ‘Allahu Akbar!’ as they tear our buildings
down and shoot up our unarmed soldiers at Ft. Hood. Islam, which
preaches death, destruction, murder, honor killings of women, etc FROM
THE PULPIT gets a free pass from you? YOU also personally blame Trump
for something that he didn’t do. HE didn’t pull the trigger on that gun
or form the KKK, which existed generations before he was ever born.
WHO is the hypocrite here? For someone telling the president not to play the blame game, you sure play it expertly.
Let’s now evaluate your so-called ‘facts’ where you state that, “he
greatest number of acts of terror over that time has not been by
radical Islam, or immigrants or refugees, or antifa, but by white
supremacists” over the last two years.
I just checked on the number of RACE RIOTS between Jan 1, 2009 to
present in the United States and do you know how many occured under
Obama in the name of RACE that were instigated by DEMOCRATS? ELEVEN (not
counting the predictable MAYDAY riot). Within these race riots were
murders, knifings and beatings, along with property damages amounting to
hundreds of millions of dollars- all in the name of political change.
This could easily fit into the definition of ‘terror’.
Know how many race riots have occured under Trump? TWO (not counting the predictable MAYDAY riot).
Know how many race riots there were in the eight years BEFOREObama? TWO.
Know how many race riots (addressing Black American concerns) there were in the eight years before that? TWOConclusion:Obama
started the modern rash of Black riots in America. I lived those years
and remember feeling that exact thing- it was under Obama that race
relations soured horribly in America- before that, we had peace and
tranquility between races- it was HIM and his rhetoric that made things
horrible. And now, Obama and his illegal ‘presidential war chest’ he
collected during his second term is funding the media and social media
war to continue the race baiting to further deteriorate race relations
in this nation. It’s not Trump who began this problem, the STATS and
FACTS demonstrate that it was OBAMA.
Know how many riots were STARTED by liberal democrats IN THE NAME of
political change, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in
damages to private property, stabbings, shootings, death and injuries
from Obama’s inauguration to today? (that meets the definition of
terrorism, by the way)? THIRTY.
Know how many were STARTED by ANY conservative group, let alone skinheads or white supremacists? ONE.
And that was the 2016 Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife
Refuge, which wasn’t actually a riot. No one was killed except one
person, shot in the back by federal agents, occupying the refuge. No
loss of private or public property was incurred.
Thus, every riot since Obama, except two, from Jan 1, 2009 to today
was STARTED by progressive democrat liberals. The only one (not
including Malheur) not started explicitly by a liberal organization is
the 2010 Springfest riot at James Madison University which was a wild
party gone wrong.
In my mind, this includes the 2017 Unite the Right white supremacist
rallies that would have gone unnoticed had the progressive liberals not
decided to counterprotest OUTSIDE their permit boundaries and into the
white supremacist permit boundaries. As usual, the liberals used
pushing, shoving, yelling and violence directly in the physical faces of
the rightful permit holders for that area. The predictable result:
violence. The permit holders for the allegedly peaceful counterprotest
was supposed to be blocks away from the white supremacists. Past and
recent experience with white supremacist rallies has proven that they
are poorly attended and laughable. This points to the real reason that
liberals decided to rally- at two locations- in 2017- they knew that
part of the white supremacist rally would be attended by legitimate
protestors who sincerely didn’t want the removal of the Confederate
monuments. They were hoping for chaos and confusion to obfuscate the
entire legitimate protest. They largely succeeded. They haven’t
bothered counter protesting any white supremacist rallies since- just as
they didn’t bother counter protesting before 2017. The recent white
supremacist rallies were once again laughably unattended.
Absolutely ZERO riots have been initiated, endorsed or claimed by a single Christian organization.
Don’t believe me for any of these REAL FACTS? Here’s the well known progressive liberal leaning wikipedia link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_United_States#2010%E2%80%932018
#Blacklivesmatter was created in 2013, UNDER OBAMA. This is one the
most extreme race baiting organizations in American Relationships.
#Blacklivesmatter and the protests under its name have results in
hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars of damages to private
property. Rallies and riots in its name have resulted in knifings,
beatings, and killings. What would happen if we created a
#WhiteLivesMatter group that made racists statements equal to that
group? We’d have riots on our streets for sure. And private businesses
would pay the same price they paid under Obama’s leadership.
Before we move forward to examine statistics over the next two years
concerning ‘terrorist’ attacks in the United States, let us define
‘terrorist attack’:
“Under current United States law, set forth in the USA PATRIOT Act,
acts of domestic terrorism are those which: “(A) involve acts dangerous
to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United
States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended – (i) to intimidate or
coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a
government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct
of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United
States.”[2][3][4]
Thus, no mere criminal act of an individual can be considered a
‘terrorist attack’. There must be a political motivation behind the
attack that wishes to coerce our People or nation to DO something as a
result of their action. Let’s be very clear about that. #MatthewDowd
has not been clear about that and that is why his alleged ‘data’ is
invalid. If his alleged ‘data’ is invalid, his argument falls down like
a flimsy deck of cards.
Let’s now evaluate the number of Islamic terror attacks versus the
number of white supremacist terror attacks over the last two years.
First, you didn’t address the localeof your
statements. If the local is the world, then your statement is a pure
joke no matter how you cut the cake. The sheer number of people murdered
worldwide by Islamic terrorism can be found here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks.
If you are too frightened to look at this link, suffice it to say that there are almost too many to count.
The number of domestic Right Wing White Supremacist Terror attacks in the last two years under Trump’s administration is ZERO. No
white supremacist group has claimed any responsibility for any violent
action in the name of advocating for political change in America. No
murders of innocent children, women, old people or any other vulnerable
population was murdered to achieve a political end. Here is that link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States
Furthermore, how fair is it to say that just because our FBI, police
and CIA are doing such an incredible job PREVENTING Islamic terror on
our home soil that Islamic terror is less dangerous than white
supremacist ‘terror’? Know how many Islamic terror attacks that the
FBI, alone, has prevented over the last two years- that we know about? EIGHTY!
They can be found at the following FBI locations:https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/american-citizen-convicted-of-conspiring-to-murder-us-nationals-in-bombing-attack-against-military-base-in-afghanistanhttps://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/losangeles/news/press-releases/dana-point-man-charged-with-scheme-to-send-export-controlled-computer-servers-to-iranhttps://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/phoenix/news/press-releases/syrian-national-convicted-for-conspiring-to-kill-american-soldiers-in-iraqhttps://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/libyan-national-charged-federal-offenses-2012-attack-us-special-mission-and-annexhttps://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/man-pleads-guilty-obstructing-counterterrorism-investigationhttps://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/florida-man-pleads-guilty-hate-crime-and-weapons-mass-destruction-charges-attempting-attackhttps://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwa/pr/montesano-man-sentenced-6-years-prison-illegal-weapons-possessionhttps://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/monroe-county-resident-sentenced-life-prison-attempting-possess-weapon-mass-destructionIraqi Refugee Sentenced for Attempting to Provide Material Support to ISILIARA Sentenced for Transferring Nearly $1.4 Million to Iraq in Violation of Sanctionshttps://www.justice.gov/usao-wdnc/pr/north-carolina-man-sentenced-life-prison-attempting-commit-act-terrorism-transcendinghttps://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism/news (36 ISIS arrests for 2018)https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism/news (25 ISIS arrests for 2017)https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism/news (8 ISIL arrests for 2017)https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/us-citizen-charged-in-brooklyn-federal-court-with-attempting-to-provide-material-support-to-isil
The following two incidents are the only two examples of ANY white
supremacy crime in the last two years in America that I could find on
the FBI database. HOWEVER, neither meets the definition of ‘terrorism’.https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/tampa/news/press-releases/neo-nazi-leader-sentenced-to-five-years-in-federal-prison-for-explosives-chargeshttps://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/four-local-members-white-supremacy-group-face-federal-charges-attacks-political-rallies
The following FOUR incidents, however, DO meet the ‘terror’ definition, but were carried out by LIBERAL PROGRESSIVES in America over the last two years:
Massachusetts Man Arrested for Mailing Threatening Letters Containing Suspicious White Powder to Trumphttps://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/massachusetts-man-pleads-guilty-sending-threatening-letters-some-containing-suspicioushttps://www.justice.gov/usao-sdtx/pr/houston-man-ordered-prison-attempting-damage-hermann-park-statuehttps://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwa/pr/former-seattle-resident-sentenced-prison-use-molotov-cocktail-may-day-2016-protest
This doesn’t count any of the Islamic threats prevented by the CIA or any local, state or federal police agencies.
While we’re at it, can we talk about the Domestic and world terrorism
caused by liberal, progressive eco-terrorists and animal rights
terrorists? Here’s just a list of American based groups:Sea Shepherd– responsible for firebombing, ramming and sinking vessels at sea, causing billions in damages, injuries to people and death.
Animal Liberation Front
Earth liberation Front
Green Peace
Earth First
Coalition to Save the Preserves
Hardesty Avengers
Wikipedia states, “In 2008 the Federal Bureau of Investigation said
eco-terrorists represented “one of the most serious domestic terrorism
threats in the U.S. today” citing the sheer volume of their crimes (over
2,000 since 1979); the huge economic impact (losses of more than US$110
million since 1979); the wide range of victims (from international
corporations to lumber companies to animal testing facilities to genetic
research firms); and their increasingly violent rhetoric and tactics
(one recent communiqué sent to a California product testing company
said: “You might be able to protect your buildings, but can you protect
the homes of every employee?”)
These LIBERAL DEMOCRAT VOTING ECOTERRORISTS exact more private
destruction, loss of life, and mayhem than any skinhead group in
America, exponentially. Individuals who happen to espouse hateful
ideologies have committed crimes, on their own, but they represent
themselves. That is not ‘terror’. These eco-groups are terrorist
organizations. And they are liberals.——————————————-

Those are the REAL FACTS, not some wishy washy fantasy of a liberal op ed writer.
#MatthewDowd attempts to mix mere crime into his alleged stats when
he makes his arguments about ‘white supremacy versus Islam, antifa, etc’
types of terror. However, the moment we begin including CRIME
incidents as ‘terror’ incidents, any kind of statistics can be gathered
to make bogus comparisons for manipulative op ed pieces like this one.
‘Terror’ has a particular political definition. While reprehensible as a
hate group, no white supremacist group has committed an act of terror
while Trump has been president. And that, my friends is a fact. There
have been many individuals of all sorts that have murdered others in our
nation, however. Some have beliefs that align with white supremacy- but
then again, there are black Americans who beat up, stab, steal from,
and destroy the lives of white people all the time in America merely
because they are white. Who remembers the game, ‘Sucker Punch’? How
about all the Korean stores that have been attacked by black gang
members in California that have been racially motivated? How about race
oriented gangs that murder one another- simply because they are
hispanic, black, Italian or skinhead? None of these are ‘terror’- but if
one wishes to, one could begin manipulating numbers and definitions to
suit just about anything they wanted to. ‘Terror’ is political. Honesty
is critical if you want to have a real discussion. This op ed is garbage
because it is dishonest.
How about Eric Holder’s statement, “Michelle [Obama] always says
‘When they go low, we go high,'” Holder told the crowd. “No. No. When
they go low, we kick them.” Holder served closely with Obama during both
tenures.
How about Maxine Waters’ call for mob action against Trump
supporters, “Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,”
Waters told a crowd in California over the weekend. “If you see anybody
from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline
station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them,
and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” This resulted
in the immediate attacks on individuals wearing MAGA hats in restaurants
and students in high schools. Obama supports Waters and vice versa. If
a white senator made the same call for mob action, it would have
resulted in the entire media equating it to calls for ‘black lynchings’.
How about Obama’s 20 year relationship with “GodDamn
America”-Caucasian-hating Reverend Wright, whom Obama credits for most
of his current beliefs in his first book, ” of my Father.” According to
Scott Paulson of CBS,‘He very powerfully wrote that
during his first experience as part of a Reverend Wright church service,
he wept. A child next to him, he wrote, had handed him a tissue to dry
the tears streaming down his cheeks.Obama did hear Reverend Wright, and he emotionally reacted to him.More than simply react to Wright’s
words, he embraced them. Obama remembered the name of the first sermon
he ever heard Reverend Wright preach and even titled a book after the
name of that first Wright sermon: The Audacity of Hope.”
This is the same Jeremiah Wright that officiated the Obama’s wedding
and all their children’s baptisms. The same Jeremiah Wright whom Obama
knew for over 25 years. The same Reverend Wright whose racist,
anti-Semitic sermons Obama listened to for over 25 years and whom he
appointed in 2007 to his prestigious African American Religious
Leadership Committee. The same Jeremiah Wright whom he suddenly
denounced, to Wright’s public scorn, when the public was outraged by his
bigoted, anti-American views.
No mention of any of THIS in #MatthewDowd’s flimsy Op Ed, right? It’s
just all Trump’s fault, right? Trump is responsible for all the bad
race relationships in America, right?Memories are very short, but
liberal media manipulative rhetoric are long.
Opinion pieces like this are hoping that YOU don’t bother to either
recall our nation’s history, our constitution, or bother to any analysis
or research into their statements. They also hope they can whip up
enough of your emotions while you are tired after a hard day of work,
trying to scrape by for your family, after reporting lots of shootings
around the nation. They are manipulating you for a REASON. You need to
THINK about WHY they want to take away the rights of the most eligible
fighting age men and women in our nation’s ability to own firearms. (ie,
18- 21 year olds) You need to THINK about why they want to take away
the #1 ability of our People to frighten our government enough from ever
thinking about using that incredible military of ours on US. (through
raising of militia BEFORE the desperate need arises). You need to think
about why they want to take away our best chance at leadership should
the People have to rise up against any attempt at some dictator who
tries to suspend our constitution and use the military against the
People. How can they do that, you ask? Simple- by saying that people
with ‘mental illness’ can’t own a firearm. That discounts almost all ex
military and police who have ever served in our nation- most of whom
have some sort of depression or anxiety. THAT qualifies as ‘mental
illness’, which is much too broad of a definition.
Ultimately, you need to know your HISTORY. Our founding fathers’
greatest concern when they gave the People the 2nd Amendment was not to
protect their homes- it was to rise up against their government. They
had experienced the tyranny of kings using the federal military against
the People and using the law to forbid the People to own arms. They
knew, first hand, what the result of such tyranny was. If Americans, in
their comfort, give up this incredible privilege, they WILL face
desperate dictatorship. It isn’t a question of ‘if’, but ‘when’. Men
haven’t changed. We haven’t evolved. We are the same. The ONLY reason we
are free as a People is our Constitution and the laws enshrined
therein. The evil men in our nation have been constrained by the limits
of it for generations- and it frustrates the hell out of them. That is
WHY they have been trying, like hell, to create any environment, any
situation, any conspiracy, anything construct possible to CONVINCE the
People to simply vote away that noble document. And they have almost
succeeded.
People often laugh when I pose the notion that this sudden rash of
shootings might not be coincidental on the eve of midterms and the
amazing number of states who will be voting on 2nd Amendment issues.
High ranking military officers & politicians discuss acceptable
death counts and collateral damages in war strategies. For some, it’s as
easy as discussing the menu for lunch. These types of men don’t see the
people who die. They only see the prize at the end. If hundreds of
thousands are ‘acceptable damages’ (think about the decision making for
Hiroshima which had a population of 350,000 at the time of the bombing),
then why not 10 at that school, 12 at that synagog, 5 at that
restaurant and 30 at that bar? This would be absolutely nothing. They
would sleep like babies and enjoy their drinks and cigars when the deeds
were done.
What would it really take, after all? An institution headed and
staffed by evil minded psychologists and psychiatrists with an intent to
manipulate and control weak and vulnerable minds. A place that could
select individuals who could be threatened or coerced into doing
whatever they wanted. A place to ‘treat’ troubled teens. Or a place to
organize several locations throughout the nation. How much money would
really be needed? And aren’t there enough wealthy people to make this
happen? Consider the payoff. When I consider it and the possible pay off
for evil minded people, I say, “Why not?” People will do pretty much
anything if it is feasible for them to get something in their own
lifetime. If they aren’t guided by any sort of fear of God, then this
life is all they care about.
There are people who are ideologically opposed to our Constitution
and the idea of individual freedoms, Friends. And they live right here
in America. This has always been so. If you will read your history, they
existed during the founding of our nation. Indeed, some of our founding
fathers even opposed it. They came around, but reluctantly. Please
don’t be naive. Don’t be a pawn. Don’t think either party are the ‘good
guys’. Neither are. The only good guys are The People. THAT is what the
Founding Fathers ultimately believed in. That is why the Preamble to the
Constitution begins with “We, the People…” It’s Us vs. the Government
and always has been. Always vote for Us. Never the Government. The day
you learn that is the day you are a true American.

04 September 2018

So, we've all heard about the latest child-rape scandal in the Catholic Church over there in Pennsylvania. Seventy years, over 300 priests involved, and more than a thousand known victims so far--guarantee you many MANY more will come forward now that this has hit the headlines.

If you have the stomach to read through the report, you;ll notice that a whole lot of the things these priests were telling these kids, and doing to them, came straight out of the Black Mass. Seriously. Which means that many of these men were not only predators, but outright Satanists. Satanist priests? Well, yeah. Satanists' favorite cover is being clergy. Not only is it one of the ultimate forms of giving the bird to God, but it's so blatantly obvious that no one wants to believe it.

Consider, if you will, America in the 1950's. Black and white, three-channel television was the Shiny New Thing. Computers were just beginning to be conceptualized, and the internet wasn't even a gleam in DARPA's eye. None of the horrors of Catholic Church sexual abuse had entered the public record. Folks still trusted their secular and spiritual leaders. Go back to that time, and try telling the parents in these parishes that the local Catholic priests are actually Satanists, and are raping their children. You know what their reaction would be?

They'd want to have you locked up. They'd think you were absolutely out of your mind. They'd never believe it. And yet, that was exactly the case, and it went on for seven decades.

Trump has, from the start of his presidency, surrounded himself by
generals and high ranking military personnel. He has given in to their
demands even when in strict opposition to his voter base’s opinion. His
spending budget was riddled with Democrat concessions in favor of
remarkable military spending. In nearly all of his speeches he’s praised
his soldiers and even suggested an American military parade. This is
likely why Q believes Trump is completely untouchable by Mueller’s
highly biased quest to ignite a Trump impeachment, as indicated in many
of his posts.

It is without question that America’s deep state will go full
throttle to attempt to sabotage the Trump presidency before their crimes
are unearthed and prosecuted. We now know that Obama had spies inside
Trump’s campaign, had FBI agents offering his colleagues damaging
information on Hillary on behalf of Russia, and had baited a “Russian
Collusion” setup in the strange event that he would win. Whether or not
Trump actually committed any crimes during his campaign is
insignificant: Mueller is going to attempt to set the stage for an
impeachment vote, and the media will throw everything they have at the
public to get them to consider. If this fails, they will use all of the
media weapons at their disposal to grow a public uprising to try to
force Trump out of power while rogue intelligence agents (now removed)
will try to sabotage any investigations that may deter this.

But through this gamble, they have inadvertently cleared the path for
Trump to garner the public support he needs to overthrow the
constitution and seize full authoritarian control of America. He has
already successfully (and thankfully) dismantled the public’s trust of
the mainstream media by proving their complete corruption. This is step
two of overthrowing any democracy, with step one being garnering
control of the military (which Trump appears to already have done). To
complete the transition, he needs to either attain control of or
dismantle the judicial branch. With the unprecedented Democrat
stonewalling on all of his judicial appointees, the former may not be
possible. But with the massive failures of all intelligence agencies and
the years of DOJ failures to prosecute criminal swamp creatures, there
is a growing consensus that our judicial system is broken beyond
repair. Should evidence arrive that the DOJ was compromised; the stage
will be set for Trump to conquer.

Honestly, I do believe that President Trump does intend to return America to its roots: The Constitution as written, the rule of law restored, the ideals of the Founders made manifest. But let's say he doesn't. Let's say that he does intend to install himself as Emperor Trump I.

So what? Someone was going to step into that spot. The way things have been going in this country, it was inevitable.

Let's imagine the Emperor's Mansion. Previous administrations all the way back to Lincoln have been surveying the property, clearing the land and building an access road. Reagan called a halt to the plan, requiring permits and deeds, but then construction started again. Bush I laid the foundation. Clinton ran the plumbing and electrical. Bush II, after 9/11, put up the framing and trusses. Under Obama, it was 24/7 overtime. By the time 2016 came around, the drywall was hung, the flooring was laid, the walls were painted and the place was ready for occupancy.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the realtor's office. Some real estate baron from New York bought the place right out from under those who thought they had it locked in.

If he chooses to leave it vacant, he'll keep out trespassers and squatters. If he moves in, I can think of far worse neighbors. At least we know he'll take care of the property.

If President Trump becomes Emperor Trump I, well, so be it. If we had stuck to our Founders' principles, enforced the rule of law and followed the Constitution, it never would have come to that point. But we haven't, which means our Great Experiment will either be saved by one man, or proven to be an abject failure by that same man. Either way, I'm not really seeing a downside--at least the truth will out and things will be solved once and for all.

14 March 2018

First and foremost, I want to make one thing perfectly clear: If Hillary Clinton ever comes to what remains of her senses, repents of her sins, and accepts Jesus Christ as her Lord and Savior, I will be the first to rejoice in that. For the Lord is "not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." (Yes, this includes even the most corrupt and evil among us, for in His sight, we have all greatly offended. It's simply a matter of degree.) I do not think that this is likely, but with God, all things are possible.That would be the best thing that could happen.The second best thing that could happen, would be for HRC to go right on doing what she's doing.Keep doubling down, Hillary! Turn it up to 11! Have another Chardonnay and let those deplorable redneck scum have it with both barrels every time you open your mouth!Man, when even hardline Democrats(who have gone beyond blue, through indigo, and are now somewhere in a spectrum of ultrablue which is invisible to anything except possibly mantis shrimp), including your own former campaign manager, wish like hell you'd shut up and go away...you really have to be Amy-Winehouse-Level committed to self-destruction. As much as I admire singleminded persistence and determination, you might have wanted to pick a better goal.But if this is the path you wish to take, Ma'am, us "Deplorables" couldn't be more pleased with the results. Keep right on keepin' on with that. Expose yourself as the shrill, bitter, angry, drunken, doddering, corrupt mess we always knew you to be, in a way that makes even some Democrats think "Well, I still hate Trump, but it really could have been worse."And the next time some smug Leftist steps to us with an utterly unwarranted air of intellectual superiority, courtesy of the Dunning-Kruger effect, we'll simply observe that, if they'd gotten their way, you--who have become basically a walking dumpster fire that even the Left is having trouble making excuses for--would have been Leader of the Free World. Therefore, their judgement is, to say the least, suspect.Whether you sit down and shut up, or continue on your present course, we win either way.

Mohamed Noor is a shrimpy little guy, who, by most accounts, was very nervous and jumpy. He did not have the build or the temperament suitable for being a police officer. I'd be saying the same thing if he were a White Christian American. But if he were a White Christian American, he never would have been a cop. He'd have washed out of the academy. They'd have been all, "Sorry, dude, police work just isn't in your future."

But the Leftists and SJW's of Minneapolis just had to have a Somali officer, no matter what. Diversity at any price. Well, now we know the exact price of their folly: The life of an innocent citizen, taken by an idiot who started blasting away at an unarmed citizen at an (alleged) 'loud noise.'

This is less the fault of Mohamed Noor than of those who put that badge on him in the first place. Minneapolitans, you put these fools into office, and you share the blame for this poor woman's death. Hope you're proud of yourselves.

20 February 2017

Seems that the Evil Overlords have realized that "Dangerous Faggot iz dangerous." Hence the orchestrated attack which we actually got a heads-up on right before all heck broke loose.

"FYI the MSM has a huge f*cking media onslaught that is set to go live
Monday to scorch earth Milo and destroy him via the pedophile label.

"I'm part of a
mailing list (not giving my real name or the name of the list for the
sake of protecting my ass from retaliation) but they have been sitting
on the story for a while, because they thought Milo was small fries and
wanted to wait until he got big enough a thread to go nuclear on.
"

Luckily, anyone who still believes the Mushroom Media does anything but lie, spin and attack anyone to the right of Karl Marx, is a drooling idiot. Or a 'journalist.' But I repeat myself. Most of America, including, especially, anyone familiar with Milo, will see this for the smear job it is. The folks at the Treehouse certainly do, even though...

"I don’t know much, almost nothing, about Mr. Yiannopoulos – but I do
know enough to spot a political UniParty approach that is as historic
and familiar as the Swamp itself. Mr. Yiannopoulos has all the same
enemies as President Trump; that cannot be coincidental."

Don't be fooled, y'all. This is nothing more than an attempt to take down one of our staunchest allies. Whatever you may think about Mr. Yiannopolis' sexuality, he's on our side and doing a hell of a job taking it to the enemy. Direct your fire downrange and don't fall for the propagandists' lies.

As for whether I care about the disinvite by CPAC, I'll let the Big Sexy himself tackle that issue:

"Don’t get me wrong, AWD would enjoy hanging out with some of the
bloggers and people I respect that I don’t see very often. We’ve had a
lot of fun and accomplished some good things together over the years.
But the reasons listed above are why AWD will not attend CPAC this year
or any time in the future. I have never been very good at kissing asses
and don’t like not being able to look at myself in the mirror. And I
will never support anything or anyone who is in bed with the Muslim
Brotherhood!"

Read All The Things. "Powers and principalities" doesn't always refer to angels and demons.

18 February 2017

Some of you might remember this post from August 2015. I was convinced that Hillary was going to be elected. I figured we were doomed. I thought that even if Trump were serious, he could do nothing against the entrenched globalist machine.

I have never been so happy to be completely, utterly wrong.

President Donald J. Trump came in with guns blazing. He's shown us that he's deadly serious about Making America Great Again, and he'll do whatever it takes to accomplish that mission. The Left is going absolutely guano* and showing everyone what they've always been--a bunch of spoiled children willing to destroy anything and everything that stands in the way of their agenda of ultimate power and control. The Cocktail Party GOP establishment are soiling themselves in terror. And normal Americans? We're delirious with joy at finally having someone in the White House who's ON OUR SIDE--something that hasn't been seen since Ronald Reagan.

It isn't over. Not by a long shot. But we now have something I thought we'd lost forever.

19 January 2017

I beg your forgiveness for using 'honor' in the same sentence as 'politics.' Mea culpa and all that.

There are two types of fights outside of straight-up warfare. One is a fight; a contest between honorable, civilized men, where a difference in opinion has become physical. In this contest, there are commonly understood rules of engagement. The other is a streetfight, where the only rule is that the winner is the one who lives to walk away.

Let's say Bob and Doug are fixin' to fight. Bob said Doug was one of those, and Doug said Bob's mother was too, or however it started. Both Bob and Doug, being civilized and honorable men, are entering the contest with the supposition that this is a fight, not a streetfight. Fists start flying, and Doug ends up getting the worst of it. Doug finally hollers out, "OK! I give up!!"

Since this is a fight between civilized and honorable men, Bob immediately stops hitting Doug, probably helps him up, and if Doug fought a good fight and Bob's really righteous, Bob will buy Doug a beer. Honorable, civilized men know that you don't keep beating on another honorable and civilized man who has surrendered. This is a core concept of honor and civilization.

Now, let's posit that Doug says "I give up!" and then, when Bob turns away, Doug starts swinging again. This changes the game. Doug has proven himself to be a liar, untrustworthy--a dishonorable man. Bob can no longer trust Doug's pleas of surrender, and therefore, this is no longer a fight. It is now a streetfight, and Bob will continue the beating until he decides the fight is over, because that's how a streetfight works. Doug decided to turn a fight into a streetfight, and Bob agreed to the terms Doug set.

If you're insufficiently conversant with the concept, go watch a bunch of John Wayne and Clint Eastwood movies until it sinks in. This is how men used to interact. It worked.

Now, let us observe the current dynamic of Left/Globalist, Right/Nationalist interaction. Now that the God-Emperor Trump has won the White House, and the Left has been repudiated at every level of government across the nation outside of the elitist coastal enclaves, we're hearing a whole lot of bleating from the defeated. Talk of 'bipartisanship,' 'cooperation,' 'reaching across the aisle,' 'compromise' and all sorts of hippy-dippy, patchouli-soaked, kumbayah platitudes.

Those of you with a memory span longer than that of a fruit fly might remember these same folks back in '09-'10, when the Left had a supermajority in Congress, and held the White House. As soon as they held the reins of power, it was all "We won, you lost, F.U." All that peace and love stuff went right out the window. It's what they've always done, and what they'll do again if they're ever given the chance. This is the political equivalent of Doug saying "I give up!" and then swinging a brick at our heads the moment we turn our backs. Anyone who, at this point, doesn't understand that this is--and always was--a streetfight, simply needs to sit down and shut up.

No, Leftists, we're not falling for it again. We expected you to act with honor, and you proved yourselves honorless. Now, the beating will continue until WE decide it's over. We will not 'compromise' or 'cooperate.' We will crush you, see you driven before us, and hear the lamentations of your women. We wanted a straight fight. You made it into a streetfight. It was your call...now you can just deal with the consequences.

30 August 2015

Language warning: Nicki can blister the paint off a battleship and make a Drill Sergeant blush.

I was that same nerd Nikki was. And I thank God for that experience, because it taught me to value the substantial over the superficial. I have a dream: to someday live in a world where artists are judged not by the color of their skin, or their gender, or their faith(or lack thereof), or who they have relations with, or who they voted for, but by the talent they display.