When comparing Acoustica Mixcraft 8 Pro Studio vs EnergyXT , the Slant community recommends Acoustica Mixcraft 8 Pro Studio for most people. In the question“What are the best DAWs?”Acoustica Mixcraft 8 Pro Studio is ranked 11th while EnergyXT is ranked 46th. The most important reason people chose Acoustica Mixcraft 8 Pro Studio is:

This DAW comes with the Acoustica Instruments collection, which is packed full of realistic sounding MIDI instruments like organs, pianos, drums, and orchestral instruments.

Pro

Video editing

Pro

Easiest DAW

Put simply it is the easiest DAW to use by far. Most users pick it up in a couple of hours.

Pro

Long time Calkwalk user here I checked out Mixcraft 8 and within minutes scrapped Sonar.

Pro

Very quick to start and to put together a track

Pro

Low system requirements

This program requires only 512MB RAM and 1.4GHz processing speed.

Pro

Multi-track recording

Audio can be recorded to multiple tracks at the same time.

Pro

Very easy and efficient to use

Most tasks are very simple and straightforward.Very clean and intuitive interface. You can do almost anything.

Cons

Con

More expensive than standard version

The Pro version of the Mixcraft DAW comes with more plugins, but many of these plugins can allegedly be download from other sources for free.

Con

Comes with unnecessary software

The Mixcraft DAW comes with a video maker which comes across as unnecessary for an audio editor. While some see this as free software, others don't see the point, as it won't come close to the quality of true video editing software.

Con

Vague purpose

EnergyXT is marketed as a DAW, ultra portable studio, DAW extension, and a VST. While the variety of uses is nice, it's hard to understand the best function of this program.

Con

No auto-save

While there's no autosave, you can still try to recover your work if EnergyXT crashes from a file named temp_file_name.xt.