Share “Lawmakers must fill comp system’s hole”

Lawmakers must fill comp system’s hole

OKLAHOMA’S workers’ compensation court offers endless examples of why the state needs a new way to deal with claims filed by injured workers.

A Midwest City firefighter was awarded $15,100 last month for a knee injury. Was he injured lugging a hose to a blaze? Mounting or dismounting a fire truck? Carrying someone from a burning building? No. His knee locked up while he was digging out a gopher hole in his backyard.

Why was this case in workers’ comp court? The firefighter and his attorneys said he had first hurt the knee while running on a treadmill at work eight months earlier. More than one judge bought this argument.

Oklahoma’s workers’ comp system has gone to seed, fertilized through the decades by a handful of specialty law firms and a few high-profile comp attorneys who ensure that cases like the firefighter’s go forward. Most of the real work is done by secretaries and paralegals.

The state has a problem when a firefighter exercising on a treadmill tweaks his knee, reports it to his supervisors, then goes about his business as usual for eight months — until his knee gives him trouble while doing something else. Only then does he decide that the injury is work-related.

We have a problem when a worker falls off a ladder on a Monday morning and says his spill had nothing to do with the fact that he’d been using meth during the weekend. Or when a woman who is told she needs knee surgery decides the best way to pay for it is to claim she got hurt on the job. The state has a problem when, instead of telling these people that they’re straining credibility, attorneys say, “See you in court!”

MORE FROM NEWSOK

The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...