Artists to Politicians: Stop the Music!

Recent public protests by musicians against candidates using their work might have some politicians treading more carefully when choosing music for their campaigns — or even their personal playlists.

Earlier this month, the band Silversun Pickups penned a cease-and-desist letter to Mitt Romney imploring that he stop using their 2009 song “Panic Switch” at events. In a news release, lead singer Brian Aubert said, “We don’t like people going behind our backs, using our music without asking, and we don’t like the Romney campaign.” Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said “Panic Switch” was “inadvertently played during the setup for one event before Romney arrived” under a blanket licensing agreement with music publishers, although that legal use is under dispute.

Snyder (right) apparently was alright with Republican gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger, left, performing "We Ain't Going to Take it Anymore," during a campaign rally held at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., in 2003. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

Last Tuesday, Dee Snider, whose band Twisted Sister scored a hit in 1984 with “We’re Not Gonna Take It,” denounced vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan for playing the youth anthem during a rally in Pennsylvania. Through his manager, Snider told the website Talking Points Memo, “There is almost nothing he stands for that I agree with except the use of the P90X” (referring to the brutal workout regimen Ryan favors).

But musician, activist and recent Moyers & Company guest Tom Morello drew his line of disapproval not at a campaign using his tunes to fire up a rally but at a candidate who merely says he’s a fan of his music.

Morello’s ’90s-era rock band Rage Against the Machine is a favorite of congressman and vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan. In a fleeting detail in an April New York Timesprofile of Ryan that also noted his connection to the Oscar Meyer “Weinermobile” and love of catching catfish bare-handed, the congressman is depicted as he “strolls the halls of Capitol Hill with the anarchist band Rage Against the Machine pounding through his earbuds.”

Once Ryan was named as Mitt Romney’s running mate, his enjoyment of Rage Against the Machine was mentioned more often, prompting a response from Morello in Rolling Stone. Morello found Ryan’s fanship “amusing, because he’s the embodiment of the machine that our music has been raging against for two decades.” He continued:

“Don’t mistake me, I clearly see that Ryan has a whole lotta ‘rage’ in him: A rage against women, a rage against immigrants, a rage against workers, a rage against gays, a rage against the poor, a rage against the environment. Basically the only thing he’s not raging against is the privileged elite he’s groveling in front of for campaign contributions.”

Morello wrote that Ryan “can like whatever bands he wants, but his guiding vision of shifting revenue more radically to the one percent is antithetical to the message of Rage.”

All of which raises a question: In a world in which songs are reappropriated all the time to sell things like computers, sneakers, and car insurance, is it odd that the same people who sing, “This land is your land, this land is my land,” may also say, “This song is my song, it can’t be your song”?

To be fair to Republican campaign strategists, song selection for rallies must be challenging. Were they to stick to songs by artists who are fans of their party, the field of material available to them would be narrow indeed: country music (a rich trove of material, but not beloved by the entire electorate) plus a handful of rock acts including right-of-center Kid Rock and outspoken right-winger Ted Nugent.

Moreover, the Romney spokeswoman is on solid legal ground — as long as the campaign pays a blanket license fee, they are generally free to play whatever music they want.

But these artists’ complaints aren’t grounded in legalities — rather, they fall into the murkier realm of public perception.

This is not entirely unrelated to the law: trademark cases often turn on public perception — consumers may infer endorsement, or be confused by the association of one image or product with another. As shown by this week’s Apple–Samsung court decision — where a jury found that Samsung stole Apple patents and associated its products with visual elements that make the iPhone a coveted gadget — issues of public perception can have billion-dollar consequences.

So it’s understandable that musicians in the public eye would be so protective of the public’s perception of them. Perhaps Somali-born rapper K’Naan explained it best when he told The New York Times earlier this year about his own run-in with the U.S. political process. The Romney campaign’s use of his song “Wavin’ Flag” at rallies led fans to accuse him of “selling out”:

“I got a flood of Twitter messages from people who assumed that it was all true, that I was now a supporter of Mitt Romney’s campaign… I’m for immigrants, I’m for poor people, and they don’t seem to be what he’s endorsing. My song being his victory song didn’t seem quite right.”

He asked the Romney campaign to stop playing his song.

What do you think? Perhaps modern political songs should come with a message similar to the cautions now standard on alcohol advertisements: Please enjoy this music responsibly.

Do not intentionally make false or misleading statements, impersonate someone else, break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity.

If your comments consistently or intentionally make this community a less civil and enjoyable place to be, you and your comments will be excluded from it.

We need your help with this. If you feel a post is not in line with the comment policy, please flag it so that we can take a look. Comments and questions about our policy are welcome. Please send an email to info@moyersmedia.com

Stop playing without permission from the artist… after all if Mitt displaying them he is using a Union to.further his goal…ASCAP/BMI….. I is interesting that outside the USA the Apple/Samsung trials are not turning out the same way as the jury trial here. I like Korea s take on it… both stole from each other… so we will banboth from selling their some of their products.

I remember when Reagan’s campaign wanted to use the chorus from Born in the USA. The Boss said no, and basically told them they should listen to the whole song.

Greg Hellman

Perhaps they do have a legal right to play whatever they’ve paid for (although “blanket license fee” sounds like yet another record company scam to me). But these artists also have every right to protest public usage and stake out their own political turf. And furthermore, maybe the raising the profile of the dispute will put election issues on the radar of those who might not normally be engaged. This is a teachable moment.

Susan Hardee

How about the political campaigns hire musicians/songwriters to produce their own original music. Employ the Artists!

Union Guy

Feel the need to educate, ASCAP/BMI are not Unions, they are Performance Rights Organizations. Big difference.

ben commons

it seems to me that the artists are perfectly on point in demanding that any particular politician stop using their music as a ‘theme song’ for any aspect of their campaigns. It certainly could be misconstrued as support for that candidate. It should be telling to people that most of the ‘cease and desist’ demands have come from artists AGAINST the Romney campaign. Things that make you go hmm.

wastelandmechanic

I thought these Republican moonbats were supposed to be all about respecting property rights. Once again, they are completely full of it.

incognito

Bill, there’s nothing odd about it. “This land was made for you and me”, but, “This song” was made by me, for my financial gain, to be used by permission only. That’s law. Right now, the GOP is looking like the same bunch of guerillas that stormed ‘this land’, and either caged or killed its inhabitants, ‘for you and me’.

incognito

Blanket license fees only come into play AFTER the copyright holder gives PERMISSION. It’s not a ‘scam’, but a safeguard, against unauthorized use of a creator’s work. Dumney thinks that, for a few dollars, he can use anyone or anything. He’s got another think coming. Just say no, to Mitt Romney!

scroes

After the GOP Convention Mitt should consider asking the Police for Message In A Bottle.. which I’d hope they withhold.