p.74

p.74

"Note that the object receiving the cascaded messages can itself be the result of a message send. In fact the receiver of all the cascaded messages is the receiver of the first message involved in a cascade. In the following example, the first cascaded message is setX:setY since it is followed by a cascade. The receiver of the cascaded message setX:setY: is the newly created point resulting from the evaluation of Point new, and not Point. The subsequent message isZero is sent to that same receiver.

Point new setX: 25 setY: 35; isZero−→false"

Is not the first message in this cascade "new" and is it not "Point" that receives it?

> "Note that the object receiving the cascaded messages can itself be the result of a message send. In fact the receiver of all the cascaded messages is the receiver of the first message involved in a cascade. In the following example, the first cascaded message is setX:setY since it is followed by a cascade. The receiver of the cascaded message setX:setY: is the newly created point resulting from the evaluation of Point new, and not Point. The subsequent message isZero is sent to that same receiver.
>
> Point new setX: 25 setY: 35; isZero−→false"
>
> Is not the first message in this cascade "new" and is it not "Point" that receives it?
> _______________________________________________
> Sbe-discussion mailing list
> [hidden email]> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/sbe-discussion

> "Note that the object receiving the cascaded messages can itself be the result of a message send. In fact the receiver of all the cascaded messages is the receiver of the first message involved in a cascade. In the following example, the first cascaded message is setX:setY since it is followed by a cascade. The receiver of the cascaded message setX:setY: is the newly created point resulting from the evaluation of Point new, and not Point. The subsequent message isZero is sent to that same receiver.
>
> Point new setX: 25 setY: 35; isZero−→false"
>
> Is not the first message in this cascade "new" and is it not "Point" that receives it?

> "Note that the object receiving the cascaded messages can itself be the result of a message send. In fact the receiver of all the cascaded messages is the receiver of the first message involved in a cascade. In the following example, the first cascaded message is setX:setY since it is followed by a cascade. The receiver of the cascaded message setX:setY: is the newly created point resulting from the evaluation of Point new, and not Point. The subsequent message isZero is sent to that same receiver.
>
> Point new setX: 25 setY: 35; isZero−→false"
>
> Is not the first message in this cascade "new" and is it not "Point" that receives it?