Hi Alexei, how reliable is this feature? I always fear these things might miss stuff and get you in trouble.

When it is of vital importance, I'd always recommend you to check yourself first, before submitting any paper.

The known problem with this feature that exists in some cases, is when Plagiarised and Referenced sections heavily overlap and are merged into one section. The resulting section may be shown as Plagiarism, even if a part of it is Referenced. However this is not likely to happen for "clean" documents, is it?

The merging algorithm is planned for upgrading in one of the future versions.

Important:- Changed the initial source extraction algorithm. The new algorithm ensures possible sources are found, as the old one has siezed to function.- Due to the framework changed, new versions give a different computer ID. This meanslicenses are to be re-initialized, if updating from an old version.

- Multiple fixes in localizations.- Multiple fixes regading compatibility with both old and new version of Windows.- Updated compatibility with secure resources to prevent failing of resources using new versions of TLS.- Other changes.

- Important: Fixed a problem, when clustering distance was the same for both presets (Arts&Sciences). Results from this version and on will be different from previous versions ad are to be more exact. Any feedback is appreciated.

- New long-awaited feature added for testing purposes: saving reports to PDF ! It will be in testing for some time and we hope it will be then added on a regular basis. Reports are uploaded to our servers for conversion and you then download the result.

Mostly ARV changes:- Added button to save the list of reports to CSV- Added button to save the report to HTML file to a desired location- Re-worked reports so that a notification is seen, when an incorrectly re-saved report is opened.- Slightly changed coloring for reports with lots of failed resources (planning to divide fails due to a client computer from those generated by servers)- New graph in reports, mouseover highlights top source for a selected section.- Added a new panel below and changed elements distribution. More elements to come.

Another recommendation would be to unlock the ability for a customer to use the previous version of the software

This would have been done, if it were possible. It was not our wish to force updating to the latest version, but the need. Due to some third party changes, versions 850 and bellow started providing totally inadequate results (very poor detection), thus we were to force-update our clients.

T-comparator presets are not so easily changed. Presets currently used are based on the algorithms developed for PAN'14 conference, plagiarism detection task, and showed one of the best results with the used document corpus. One of the lines of our research now is what is different between that corpus and the "real-life" cases, which can be closely connected to the problem you report.

Changing the preset in the current system requires some research, as we need to be sure the new preset works better. At present we have started additional tests on the false-positive detection and upon the results we will both post here and may start making the needed alterations.