Comments on: The Bancrofts’ final WSJ capitulationhttp://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/05/28/the-bancrofts-final-wsj-capitulation/
A slice of lime in the sodaSun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.3By: steamboatbillhttp://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/05/28/the-bancrofts-final-wsj-capitulation/comment-page-1/#comment-15280
Sat, 29 May 2010 13:41:02 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4054#comment-15280Long before Murdoch, the Bancrofts had handed editorial control to the despicable Robert Bartley, who was proudly to the right of Attila the Hun. The WSJ fight was never about “principles” since the family was disengaged from the paper. It was about the difference between being the owners of a famous property and merely being rich. Rich is better.
]]>By: gsternhttp://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/05/28/the-bancrofts-final-wsj-capitulation/comment-page-1/#comment-15275
Sat, 29 May 2010 08:01:28 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4054#comment-15275Yep, that is pretty much the only moral compass we have left in this country. Money. Nothing matters more.
]]>