Welcome to the E46Fanatics forums. E46Fanatics is the premiere website for BMW 3 series owners around the world with interactive forums, a geographical enthusiast directory, photo galleries, and technical information for BMW enthusiasts.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

This video shows proof of how Jones slapped the **** out of Morgan. Pratt was making calm, sensible points, and Morgan was barking moronic arguments. Jones was the ONE person I have ever seen not let Morgan make these idiotic statements, and when he did, he was b!tch slapped by them. Again, I personally don't like Jones. I think he is a loon. However, in this particular interview, with facts on his side, he absolutely steamrolled Morgan...on his own show no less.

Jones looked like a tool. He yelled and ranted and shrugged off questions the same way Piers did when speaking with Pratt.

Jones looked like a tool. He yelled and ranted and shrugged off questions the same way Piers did when speaking with Pratt.

When it comes to this debate :

Pratt >>>>> Piers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jones

Sorry dude but Jones looks like a fkin loon

I agree. My point was that Jones controlled the floor on MORGAN's show. Jones put Morgan on the spot, not vice versa. Morgan simply was outmatched in terms of arguing power. Morgan was completely unprepared for that interview, and Jones clearly did a lot of homework. See if you can find the transcript and read the interview, rather than watch it. Jones' points were solid, but delivered poorly.

Is Jones' rant what passes for reasoned discourse in right wing circles these days? Not even a minute into the "interview," well, rant, and Jones rattled off more conspiracy theories than I know existed. And he was just clearing his throat before launching into full red-faced tirade.

Morgan was wise simply to sit back and reel out all the rope this clown needed to intellectually hang himself and his, ummm, ideas.

I agree. My point was that Jones controlled the floor on MORGAN's show. Jones put Morgan on the spot, not vice versa. Morgan simply was outmatched in terms of arguing power. Morgan was completely unprepared for that interview, and Jones clearly did a lot of homework. See if you can find the transcript and read the interview, rather than watch it. Jones' points were solid, but delivered poorly.

Jones didn't control the debate though... He made a fool of himself. Piers controlled and won the debate without a single word.

Is Jones' rant what passes for reasoned discourse in right wing circles these days? Not even a minute into the "interview," well, rant, and Jones rattled off more conspiracy theories than I know existed.

Morgan was wise simply to sit back and reel out all the rope this clown needed to intellectually hang himself and his, ummm, ideas.

I never said it was reasoned discourse. I said he provided many facts that are 100% true. That no one blames the drug companies for hooking people on these pills. No one blames the medical problem of over prescribed medication. Everyone is afraid to lose their precious sponsorship dollars. He had a lot of very VERY valid points. Not all of them were good, but a level headed person could have made amazing arguments. Morgan repeats the same crap in all his interviews, all of which are skewed lies. The 35 murders in Britain. The Assault weapons, which are less lethal than regular handguns. The guns falling out of holsters. All those points are moronic, amateurish, and him calling people idiots (especially someone older than him) shows him as a classless, tactless, talentless quasi journalist.

Jones didn't control the debate though... He made a fool of himself. Piers controlled and won the debate without a single word.

Lets look at it this way then. You can either have Morgan go on his tirade about low murders in Britain and how ARs are bad babbling like an idiot, or Jones can babble. Morgan is not Oreilly. He is not nearly as professional. He cannot hold a cool, level headed, equal time debate. He yells or his opponents yell. In this case, Jones won the yelling match. Yes, he looked stupid doing it, and I guess you are right, winning the stupid contest isn't really winning, but he didn't let Morgan make his moronic points. I'm with you at the core, he did nothing to promote the safe legal gun culture, and made them look like extremists, and for that, and that alone, he failed. There is nothing wrong with speaking passionately, but going on rants with tangents didn't do us any good.

Lets look at it this way then. You can either have Morgan go on his tirade about low murders in Britain and how ARs are bad babbling like an idiot, or Jones can babble. Morgan is not Oreilly. He is not nearly as professional. He cannot hold a cool, level headed, equal time debate. He yells or his opponents yell. In this case, Jones won the yelling match. Yes, he looked stupid doing it, and I guess you are right, winning the stupid contest isn't really winning, but he didn't let Morgan make his moronic points. I'm with you at the core, he did nothing to promote the safe legal gun culture, and made them look like extremists, and for that, and that alone, he failed. There is nothing wrong with speaking passionately, but going on rants with tangents didn't do us any good.

Man you are a person that lives in denial. Take your pyrrhic victory and move on. Keep beliving jones is reasonable and bested piers with ramblings, and conspiracy.

How is someone like Jones going to cause us to lose our Constitutional rights? He is simply exercising his 1st amendment right. He's a hot head with strong opinions (based on data when talking about guns), but outside of that, he's certainly not threatening our liberties as outlined in the Constitution.

Alex Jones blew it when he mentioned the NWO. They broke up a long time ago and Hulk Hogan is retired now.

ummm excuse me, when you are NWO you are NWO

4 life

__________________

“They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.” - Saul Alinsky, quoting Lenin

“I wanted [Jimmy] Carter in and I wanted [Ford] out,” comedian Chevy Chase would later admit of his mocking Ford impersonation on "Saturday Night Live", “and I figured look, we're reaching millions of people every weekend, why not do it."

I never said it was reasoned discourse. I said he provided many facts that are 100% true.

Yes, he did reel of many somewhat random parade of "facts," if you will, that, while individually perhaps correct in some sense, were wildly woven together in service to wholly inchoate conspiracy theories. So, while this spray of "facts" may indeed give a surface impression of well-reasoned and logical broader theory, their tenuous coherency mirrors more the word salad of a schizophrenic than the more disciplined reasoning of a rational and steady mind.

Facts, however, do not necessarily support a theory simply by being weighed by the pound or the vehemence with which they are stated, but rather, how they logically related to and support a theory.

Pro gun control advocates can only dream of more anti gun control advocate victories like this.

Yes, he did reel of many somewhat random parade of "facts," if you will, that, while individually perhaps correct in some sense, were wildly woven together in service to wholly inchoate conspiracy theories. So, while this spray of "facts" may indeed give a surface impression of well-reasoned and logical broader theory, their tenuous coherency mirrors more the word salad of a schizophrenic than the more disciplined reasoning of a rational and steady mind.

Facts, however, do not necessarily support a theory simply by being weighed by the pound or the vehemence with which they are stated, but rather, how they logically related to and support a theory.

Pro gun control advocates can only dream of more anti gun control advocate victories like this.

How is someone like Jones going to cause us to lose our Constitutional rights? He is simply exercising his 1st amendment right. He's a hot head with strong opinions (based on data when talking about guns), but outside of that, he's certainly not threatening our liberties as outlined in the Constitution.

"In a post-Piers video Jones posted to YouTube, he warned viewers about the possibility of his assassination at the hands of the NYPD under orders from Michael Bloomberg. He tells his listeners: "If something happens to us and we're killed by crackheads, it was the NYPD or mafia."

Below the video, which has the title "Armed Mafia Are Stalking Us: Post Piers Morgan Debate," is a note:

"We just got off CNN and undercover cops are all over us. They have been on our ass all day but now they are stalking us! We need to put this on the record in case the [sic] set us up.""

Incredibly, Jones manages to make P. Morgan the erudite sage of TV in comparison.

"In a post-Piers video Jones posted to YouTube, he warned viewers about the possibility of his assassination at the hands of the NYPD under orders from Michael Bloomberg. He tells his listeners: "If something happens to us and we're killed by crackheads, it was the NYPD or mafia."

Below the video, which has the title "Armed Mafia Are Stalking Us: Post Piers Morgan Debate," is a note:

"We just got off CNN and undercover cops are all over us. They have been on our ass all day but now they are stalking us! We need to put this on the record in case the [sic] set us up.""

Incredibly, Jones manages to make P. Morgan the erudite sage of TV in comparison.