He gets fired and suspended on a pretty regular basis.
Keith Olbermann is a former sportscaster who decided he was actually a political commentator like everybody else, and for a while he was able to maintain a modest following by bellowing at George W. Bush to resign. That was a long time ago. These days he’s remembered, if he’s remembered at all, as the guy who made a point of alienating anybody and everybody who ever cut him a check.
Fired twice from MSNBC. Fired twice from ESPN. Fired once from Current. Soon to part ways with GQ. Everything posted below is Wikileaks condensed version. The salacious versions are far more telling.

Keith Olbermann is the poster child for unintended consequences.
He isn't critiquing anything. He's making a projection. If the prediction were that Trump was going to do something right it would be interesting, as would a segment criticizing Obama, Hillary, or any Democrat policy. But there is no substance to back up his assertions - he's just saying things you already agreed with.
He's a partisan hack hacking about things that have not happened yet. In short, he represents everything that is wrong with journalism today.
But I do laugh every time I click this link, because he's such a miserable prick I know it must piss him off endlessly: www.keitholbermann.com

Yeah. Everything good that happens is Obama's doing but the bad things are Trump's even though Trump has not taken office yet.
Bringing back jobs is a good start, but (and I've said this about 100 times) the GAO has consistently pointed out that our economy cannot sustain the level of debt we are projected to incur. The congressional budgets that Obama signed do indeed have debt falling, but that's only short term. It is rising again this year as projected, and without some serious structural changes the economy will collapse. That's not me talking - that's the government beancounter position.
Of course the Democrats will blame Trump and the GOP will blame the Democrats but it's a bipartisan problem and either Trump will either deal with it, exacerbate it, or simply suffer it.

Up until the mid-90's women shaved once in a while for the surprise factor. Now it's a standard grooming practice. It's just trendy I think. But maybe there were women like me saying the same thing when women started shaving their underarms and legs too. I guess some trends stick to culture.

So many strawmen. Libertarians do not operate on the theory that people are honest or principled. She was not in government, therefore she did not game the system. She merely played by the rules other people dictated.
You might be right! She might be taking it over to make sure her industry gets protection. But she might be taking over in order to make sure other people don't have to face the overwhelming obstacles she did. We don't know what she will do.
My biggest hope is simply that Trump fires people who do not perform.

I like how they interchange health insurance with health care.
In my book, making America great doesn't mean forcing employers to pay minimum wages, much less OT and health insurance. Apparently your government model looks different than Ron Paul's?

No. On voting day, the ballots are removed from the machine and placed into storage. The ballots are not hand counted at that point - the numbers on the machine are recorded. It's a cluster fuck.
It's sort of convoluted. When voters show up, we sign a numbered slip. Then we present that slip to the person who passes out ballots. The ballots are not numbered, so you can't tell who voted for who, but they can tell that they passed out X number of ballots, and also who received each ballot.
So at the end of the day in a polling place with only a single scanner, the number on the scanner should match the number of ballots distributed. Of course some people make mistakes and get another ballot, but there's a log for that too. If 72 people got one ballot each, the number on the machine should equal 72 at the end of the day provided nobody forgot to feed it into the machine.
Sometimes the scanners jam. It will take the ballot halfway, then stop. The poll workers pull it out and then feed it through again. Apparently this tabulates some of the votes as well as adds 1 to the counter.
Obvious solution is obvious: when they are emptying the machines they should count to be sure the number of ballots distributed matches the number of ballots scanned. If not, then a manual count on the spot.