Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member!

Some other articles about how great Iams Is. It's a shame because the product is located in super markets and is easy access and so many are buying it. Aside from it not being the best food to feed, it's also a cruel pet food manufacturer. I've known it for years, but so many would never associate a pet food company with this type of cruelty. If you google there is so much on Iams including video footage shot in their facility.

Iams had a major 'outing' about 5 yrs ago or...? I think it was around that time, but don't quote me. It was really sad, really disappointing. They're a huge company, and they do have the money to do things more honorably.

It was my understanding that after they were cited, they made very public changes to how they tested their foods on animals, and how they were going to handle this issue going forward.

So, I wasn't sure if you were referring to the situation from a few years back, or is there also a new incident/investigation? If there is, it'd be great to know about it.

The positive side of what happened a few years back is that there was a big outcry against how IAMS/Eukanube/Proctor&Gamble was cruel in their animal testing. That outcry had resulted in some forward movement.

Iams had a major 'outing' about 5 yrs ago or...? I think it was around that time, but don't quote me. It was really sad, really disappointing. They're a huge company, and they do have the money to do things more honorably.

It was my understanding that after they were cited, they made very public changes to how they tested their foods on animals, and how they were going to handle this issue going forward.

So, I wasn't sure if you were referring to the situation from a few years back, or is there also a new incident/investigation? If there is, it'd be great to know about it.

The positive side of what happened a few years back is that there was a big outcry against how IAMS/Eukanube/Proctor&Gamble was cruel in their animal testing. That outcry had resulted in some forward movement.

I hope they haven't gone backward .

You are correct & the dates in the link the OP provided are from a few yrs back.