July Fourth Celebrates America’s and the West’s Core Values

Why should we celebrate the Fourth of July? Because America — as the greatest product of Western civilization — is the greatest country in the world. But it cannot remain great unless we understand the causes of its greatness.

In this age of diversity-worship, it is considered axiomatic that all cultures and countries are equal. Western culture, it is declared, is in no way superior to that of any other, not even to tribes of cannibals. To deny the equality of all cultures, claim the intellectuals, is to be guilty of the most heinous of intellectual sins: “ethnocentrism.” It is to flout the “sacred” (and false) principle of cultural relativism. I disagree with the relativists — absolutely.

There are three fundamental respects in which Western culture is objectively the best. The core values and achievements of Western civilization — the values that made America great — are:

1. Reason. The Greeks were the first to identify philosophically that knowledge is gained through reason and logic as opposed to mysticism (faith, tradition, revelation, dogma). It would take two millennia, including a Dark Ages and a Renaissance, before the full implications of Greek thought would be realized. The rule of reason reached its zenith in the West in the 18th century — the Age of Enlightenment. “For the first time in modern history,” writes one philosopher, “an authentic respect for reason became the mark of an entire culture.” America is the epitome of Enlightenment thought.

2. Individual Rights. An indispensable achievement leading to the Enlightenment was the recognition of the concept of individual rights. John Locke demonstrated that individuals do not exist to serve governments, but rather that governments exist to protect individuals. The individual, said Locke, has an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of his own happiness. This was the founding philosophy of America. (America made a disastrous error by tolerating slavery, which originated elsewhere, but it was too incongruent with America’s core principles of reason and rights to endure and was corrected in the name of those principles.)

3. Science and Technology. The triumph of reason and rights made possible the full development and application of science and technology and ultimately modern industrial society. Once man’s mind was freed from the tyranny of religious dogma, and man’s productive capacity was freed from the tyranny of state control, scientific and technological progress followed in several interdependent steps. Men began to understand the laws of nature. They invented machinery. They engaged in large-scale production, that is, the creation of wealth. This wealth, in turn, financed and motivated further invention and production. As a result, horse-and-buggies were replaced by automobiles, wagon tracks by steel rails, and candles by electricity. At last, after millennia of struggle, man became the master of his environment.

The result of these core achievements was an increase in freedom, wealth, health, comfort, and life expectancy unprecedented in the history of the world. These Western achievements were greatest in the country where the principles of reason and rights were implemented most consistently — the United States of America. In contrast, it was precisely in those (third-world) countries which did not embrace reason, rights, and technology where people suffered (and still suffer) most from both natural and man-made disasters (famine, poverty, illness, dictatorship) and where life-expectancy was (and is) lowest. It is said that primitives live “in harmony with nature,” but in reality they are simply victims of the vicissitudes of nature — if some dictator does not kill them first.

The greatness of America is not an “ethnocentric” prejudice; it is an objective fact. This assessment is based on the only proper standard for judging a culture or a society: the degree to which its core values are pro- or anti-life. Pro-life cultures acknowledge and respect man’s nature as a rational being who must discover and create the conditions which his survival and happiness require — which means that they advocate reason, rights (freedom), and technological progress.

Despite its undeniable triumphs, America is by no means secure. Its core principles are under attack from every direction — by religious zealots who want to undermine the separation of church and state, and by its own intellectuals, who are denouncing reason in the name of skepticism, rights in the name of special entitlements, and progress in the name of environmentalism. We are heading rapidly toward the destruction of our core values and the dead end of nihilism. The core values and achievements of the West and of America must be asserted proudly and defended to the death. Our lives depend on them.

About Edwin A Locke

Very similar to Objectivism. It is said to be the most American modern philosophy that I try to live by.

James

You’ve erected a straw man here by confusing terms and applying somewhat arbitrary definitions to them, a hallmark of supposedly “Objectivist” “thinkers”. Ethnocentrism, cultural relativism, and moral relativism are distinct concepts. Cultural relativism is an observable phenomenon that simply states that one’s native culture influences perception, i.e. two people from different cultures will observe the same object, but describe or contextualize it much differently. For example, the spectrum of visible light is the same everywhere, but various cultures slice it up into various different parts. Some cultures have no word for what we call green, while other cultures see the part of the visible spectrum that we call green as multiple different colors, all of which a westerner would say are green of one sort or another. Ethnocentrism is related to cultural relativism but imposes a moral judgement – i.e. if one were to claim that our way of perceiving and describing color is the best one, they would be ethnocentric.

Moral relativism, on the other hand, states that there is no universal moral code and that all moral codes are equally valid. There is plenty of evidence to say that this is not true – core aspects of morality are deeply imbued in the human animal and are shared amongst all cultures.

Your muddled hyperbole does only disservice to you and your readers. To start, I suggest carefully defining your terms and narrowing your arguments.

EMAIL BLAST

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine often presents views that we do not entirely agree with, because they may still contain information of value to our readers.