Here is a comment on this debate by St. Estephe (The Unknown History of MISANDRY):

People who are not social constructionists do not believe
they should be monitored and supervised by social constructionists, conversely
social constructionists will make every effort to monitor and supervise
everyone. The marxist notion of “male gender” and “female gender” is extremely
dissimilar to the natural (existential) reality of there being a “male sex” and
“female sex.” In order to escape from the supervision of those who want to
control us, we must come to the realization that even the use the term “gender”
in our own speech and writing – when we mean to refer to the sexes – is undermining
us. Freedom is costly. The orthodoxy, regardless of its nature in any given
region or historical period, will not facilitate freedom. Here and now,
political correctness (social control) is the orthodoxy, employed by government
and financial powers (“corporations” and the finance above them) in perfect
harmony. (June 30, 2012)

***

A good introduction to The
Unknown History of MISANDRY is the post, “A Woman’s Voice”

Sunday, June 24, 2012

NOTE: “Herstory” is collapsing. The
fraudulent narrative of the history of the relations of the sexes (that has
been constantly pounded into our heads by propagandists since we were children)
will not hold up in the face of the evidence being uncovered by activists who
are devoting untold hours to show the truth of the past in an effort to wake
people up from their hypnotized state. No amount of blacklisting, overt
censorship, de facto censorship, hiring quotas, heavily-funded propaganda,
Unesco educational protocols promoted by the Dept. of Ed., anti-Constitutional
regulations, threats of prosecution for First Amendment-protected free speech will
prevent the orthodox narrative from crumbling before our eyes.

***

FULL
TEXT: Washington, Aug. 10—”Compulsory
disarmament of women” was suggested today by Alice Robertson, Oklahoma’s lady
congressman. With murders by women on the increase, she declared it as
necessary as the disarmament of nations.

‘“The
lady from Oklahoma” had been asked to comment on the shocking and growing
tendency of her sex to kill off the male population.

“The
women talk so much about disarmament – well, why don’t they disarm’’ she
demanded. “Why don’t they begin it by disarming women.”

When
informed a movement was under way to have her named as a woman member of the
American delegation to the president’s disarmament conference, she said:

Why
should I be? There is no place for women.

~ Get
Off Too Easy. ~

Speaking
her mind on women murderers, suffragists and other females of the species, she
said:

“Women
who murder get off too easy. They’re not judged according to the same standards
as men who murder, but you don’t hear the suffragists demanding equal rights
for the men, do you? No, the suffragists want equal rights for women with
special privileges.

“Men
are not so bad. Women declare them cruel and unjust but they are not. It is to
be remembered that men who are bad had women as their mothers.”

“But
to disarm only the women – that would be unjust,” it was suggested.

“There
should be compulsory disarmament of men too – of course, the men should be
included,” said Miss Alice.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

NOTE: Research for UHoM
has turned up hundreds of forgotten female serial killers including a large
number of Black Widows, women who murdered two or more husbands. The Ada
Wittenmyer is a case of relatively recent date: she died while awaiting trial
in 1984. Normally, one would expect such a recent case to have been included in
current lists of female serial killers. Yet the case does not.

This case has the particular value of offering a clearly
stated m.o. delineating not only a clear-cut strategy of exploiting men through
offering companionship and/or sex, a common feature of black widow serial
killer cases, but also in disclosing the corollary sadistic motive. When the
Alimony Reform League did a study in 1935
of motivations of women who sought to have husbands for failing to pay alimony the stunning outcome was that sadistic
pleasure in seeing the man suffer overrode, in the majority of cases, the need
– or desire – for additional cash.

In looking at cases of maternal filicide during child custody disputes, there are other
documented cases showing a motivation of sadistic pleasure, not in the enjoyment
in watching the murdered children’s suffering, but in depriving the targeted
man, the father of their children, for suffering. This scenario is matched, of
course, in cases where a father is perpetrator.

As is now well-known, studies of false rape accusations and
child-father access denial (including outright parental kidnapping), initiated
by members of the Men’s Rights Movement and Fathers’ Rights Movement, reveal
that sadistic pleasure in the counterpart’s suffering is a common motive.

Statements of motive made by female serial killers are
scarce. Jane Toppan represents one of
the few cases where the murderess has described her intense pleasure in
watching her victims die.

***

FULL
TEXT (Article 1 of 3): Dickson, Tenn. – Police exhumed the body of Ada Laverne
Crow Evans Hensley Hayes Wittenmyer’s third husband Tuesday to see if he, like
her fourth husband, died of arsenic poisoning.

The
plump, 33-year-old brunette, last seen near Gallatin, Tenn., two weeks ago, is
already wanted for the murder of her fourth husband, John L. Wittenmyer, 62, a
wealthy Oklahoma antique dealer and rancher.

The
couple married three years ago, two weeks after she answered his ad in a
“lonely hearts” magazine.

Wittenmyer
died March 28, just one day after he signed a handwritten will leaving the bulk
of the cattle ranching estate to his wife, Oklahoma officials said.

Suspicious
authorities ordered the body of Mrs. Wittenmyer’s third husband – William
Clifford Hayes, who died five years ago – exhumed Tuesday from a Nashville
cemetery and shipped to Memphis, where an autopsy will be performed by the
state medical examiner.

Mrs.
Wittenmyer told police she found her husband dead at the couple’s Bartlesville,
Okla., home after she returned from a shopping excursion. At the time, police
assumed he died of a heart attack.

But when
investigators returned to the home to question Mrs. Wittenmyer further, she was
gone. An autopsy then turned up arsenic in the rancher’s body.

Officials
said Mrs. Wittenmyer has been married at least four times. Police talked to one
of her ex-husbands, but refused to release his identity.

FULL
TEXT (Article 2 of 3): Nashville, Tenn. – A woman who met men through lonely hearts clubs and
poisoned two of her four husbands with arsenic hanged herself with a prison
bedsheet and left a note saying “at last I have found peace,” authorities said.

Ada
Wittenmyer, 39, was found hanging in her cell Wednesday evening, six days after
being sentenced to life in prison for the 1974 murder of her third husband,
William Hayes. She had pleaded innocent by reason of insanity.

Hayes’
body was exhumed after Mrs. Wittenmyer’s fourth husband died of arsenic
poisoning. She was convicted of that killing in 1982 and sentenced to a 25-year
prison term in the poisoning of wealthy Oklahoma rancher John Wittenmyer, whom
she met through a lonely hearts club advertisement. Her other two marriages ended
in divorce.

Authorities
discovered last week that Mrs. Wittenmyer was continuing to correspond with at
least one man she had met through a lonely hearts club advertisement.

In
one of several handwritten suicide notes she left in her cell at DeBerry Correctional
Institute here, Mrs. Wittenmyer said, “I want to remain as I lived – alone.”

In
another note, Mrs. Wittenmyer asked prison officials to call her parents and
“tell them at last I have found peace,” Warden Aileene Love said.

“I’ve
brought shame and disgrace on my family. God knows they tried to love me, but
it’s hard to love a mentally ill child that you don’t know what’s wrong with
them,” the note said.

Mrs.
Wittenmyer was alone in her cell under mandatory segregation at the time of her
death, Mrs. Love said. She had been held at DeBerry since last winter to await
trial in Hayes’ death.

A
DeBerry cellmate testified at last week’s trial that Mrs. Wittenmyer told her
about poisoning her two husbands.

“She
said she was going to go through life finding men with money and poisoning
them, using the lonely hearts club ads. She said that she enjoyed to see them in
pain from the poison,” testified Barbara Quaranto, 46, who was convicted in
Chattanooga in the shooting death of her 73-year-old husband.

Canadian
rancher Henry Joneson said he sent 12 letters and a $1,150 check to Mrs.
Wittenmyer before learning last week that the address she had given him was the
prison and not the retreat she had told him it was.

The Tomahawk, Alberta, man said he answered Mrs.
Wittenmyer’s ad in [an] agricultural publication in April that read: “Widow
wishes to start new life – will relocate.”

When Mrs. Wittenmyer telephoned him after her second
poisoning conviction, Johnson said he told her,” … I found out everything and
goodbye.”

Oklahoma Chief Forensic Psychiatrist Dr. R. D. Garcia, who
treated Mrs. Wittenmyer for more than three years during her imprisonment in
Oklahoma, testified she suffered from paranoid schizophrenia.

But Roger Hensley, Mrs. Wittenmyer’s first husband, said he
did not believe she was mentally ill.“I lived with her
off, and on for nine years and she has always known what she was doing,” said Hensley.
“She is just mean … She was kind to people, but then she would turn around and
be worse than heck.”

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 3): Dear Ann Landers: I always thought it was
narrow-minded and mean of you to take such a strong stand against lonely-hearts
advertisements. I changed my mind today when I read the Nashville Banner.

It seems a man named Henry Joneson of Tomahawk, Alberta
(Canada), answered an ad in an agricultural publication. The woman who was
looking for a companion was Ada Wittenmyer, age 37. Henry, the 50-year-old over
a 900-acre ranch, was lonesome and thought Ada sounded “interesting.” He didn’t
realize his letters and checks were going to prison until District Attorney
General Kenneth Atkins called and told him that Ada had just been convicted of
poisoning her first husband. she already was serving a 25-year term for
poisoning her third husband – a wealthy Oklahoma rancher she had met through
another lonely-hearts ad. Atkins said that when he told him the news Mr.
Joneson said, “Oh, Lord.”

I hope you will print this letter in your column, Ann, as a
warning to others who are lonely. And please accept my apologies for my
previous attitude. – Nashville Reader

Dear Reader: Nothing I might have said could have had the
import of your report. I checked it out with Nashville and every detail was
right on. Thanks for the backup.

►►►The
false narrative of the history of the relations between the sexes (called
“genders” by cultural Marxists) was written by liars and cowards in a
deliberate effort to recondition boys and girls to accept authoritarian
control. It is based on the social engineering theory of social constructionists.
It is time We the People, honest men
and women, reclaim our own history and replace the misandric fairy tale of
“herstory” with the actual and well-documented truth.

“Honest history is the weapon of freedom.” – Arthur
Schlesinger Jr.

***

Note: Yes, Ernest Belfort Bax did come before, but Sam &
Sigurd were activists rather than just polemicists. This is why they are more
accurately described as the founders than earlier figures who wrote about men’s
rights yet did not take action that inspired others to rally and organize.

The bottom line is that there is no purpose in quibbling
about definitions and categories as long as there is a single MRA who does not
know the stories of Reid and Hoeberth (Höberth) – and as long as there is a single boy who does not learn their stories.

***

►►►Be
assured, the university system and the mainstream media will never, ever, assist
us in replacing the misandric phony orthodox historical narrative with the
truth. It is up to us to do it ourselves, regardless of the resistance we will
face.

If we do not do it will never be done. But it needs to be done.

It is up to you.

►►►ACTIONS TO TAKE◄◄◄

► Send
this post out to the world. Be relentless. Do it constantly over a long period
of time. Reach everyone.

► Write
a song about Sam or Sigurd, or both. Record it. Put it out there.

► Write
a blog post or do a YouTube video about them. What does it feel like to learn that your legacy has
been denied you by your schools and the media by blacklisting the history of
the long struggle against misandry?

► Make
their pictures known. These images are icons of our struggle for freedom.

► Teach
these stories to your children. Ask them to make pictures and to write
something. Post these children’s pictures and writings online.