If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

All transactions on PayPal and elsewhere are demanded to be redeemed in lawful money as found in Section 16 of the Fed Act and at Title 12 USC 411.

Thank you so much for enjoying StSC! If you are getting popups please try clearing your browser cache.

TY

although the reference "as well as upon the high sea's" establishes the need for choice of law as a priority in any/all exercise of rights/remedy

Out of the state. In reference to rights, liabilities, or
jurisdictions arising out of the common law, this phrase
is equivalent to "beyond sea" (q. v.). In other connections,
it means physically beyond the territorial limits of
the particular state in question,

(state of mind is the first question, land or sea, sea or beyond the sea)

Q.V. An abbreviation of "quod vide," meaning "which
see".

and what rabbit hole would neglect to add a symbol (?) which see?
Sedes Sapientiae?

The high seas, solicits a maritime choice of law right from square one, which could move the venue out of state, physically beyond the territorial limits and into the twilight zone where common law is not competent to give it "remedy"

The continental United States, excluding Alaska, shall be divided into not less than eight nor more than twelve districts. Such districts may be readjusted and new districts may from time to time be created by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, not to exceed twelve in all:

Provided

That the districts shall be apportioned with due regard to the convenience and customary course of business and shall not necessarily be coterminous with any State or States. Such districts shall be known as Federal reserve districts and may be designated by number. When the State of Alaska or Hawaii is hereafter admitted to the Union the Federal Reserve?[1] districts shall be readjusted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in such manner as to include such State. Every national bank in any State shall, upon commencing business or within ninety days after admission into the Union of the State in which it is located, become a member bank of the Federal Reserve System by subscribing and paying for stock in the Federal Reserve bank of its district in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and shall thereupon be an insured bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.], and failure to do so shall subject such bank to the penalty provided by section 501a of this title.

although the reference "as well as upon the high sea's" establishes the need for choice of law as a priority in any/all exercise of rights/remedy

Out of the state. In reference to rights, liabilities, or
jurisdictions arising out of the common law, this phrase
is equivalent to "beyond sea" (q. v.). In other connections,
it means physically beyond the territorial limits of
the particular state in question,

(state of mind is the first question, land or sea, sea or beyond the sea)

Q.V. An abbreviation of "quod vide," meaning "which
see".

and what rabbit hole would neglect to add a symbol (?) which see?
Sedes Sapientiae?

The high seas, solicits a maritime choice of law right from square one, which could move the venue out of state, physically beyond the territorial limits and into the twilight zone where common law is not competent to give it "remedy"

remedy still exists though to suitors which see which sea

I apologize, it really is a brilliant name

The foundational "fluff" for the Libel of Review is still that when one approaches a man or woman on the land, from somewhere else (the districts/Fed) they must do so through the district courts of the United States. Of course the little enclave called "mailbox" is sufficient. But then, that becoming common knowledge would lead everybody to redemption even faster.

and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land.

Is that referring to the common law? And if so, is that also predicated upon express reservation?

does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.

does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.

Elegant and poetic!

It is suiting that as Rosh HaShannah and Yom Kippur approach on this seventieth Jubilee since the invasion of Canaan that we find this indictment regurgitated on the Record, in the same Court.

Some times, like the US Treasury Vault video (indicating value in US notes), I wonder if you can all appreciate seeing things that you are not supposed to be viewing.