It's an overshove. I like these plays with these kind of hands, though, stacks are too deep here.
Also here's another reason why I think you shouldn't do it in this spot:
- Villain seems to have decent stats
- This board is a very bad board for him to cbet as a bluff. That means that he probably has a really strong range here, meaning you have less fold equity with your shove, making the shove itself a lot worse
- another factor is that he has bet pot. Betting pot in this spot, into 2 players, on this flop, means to me that he won't fold to your shove, if ever.
- the only reason why you wanna shove as a semi bluff is to increase your equity (by creating fold equity to win the pot without showdown). Since you have next to no fold ewuity here, this makes the shove worse.

As for how I'd play, I think I fold here, eventhough it seems very weak, I don't expect to get much more value if I do hit my straight, and I don't expect to have a lot of equity other than the straightdraw (maybe another 10, however even that wouldn't fully satisfy me playing postflop and facing another big bet).

It's an overshove. I like these plays with these kind of hands, though, stacks are too deep here.
Also here's another reason why I think you shouldn't do it in this spot:
- Villain seems to have decent stats
- This board is a very bad board for him to cbet as a bluff. That means that he probably has a really strong range here, meaning you have less fold equity with your shove, making the shove itself a lot worse
- another factor is that he has bet pot. Betting pot in this spot, into 2 players, on this flop, means to me that he won't fold to your shove, if ever.
- the only reason why you wanna shove as a semi bluff is to increase your equity (by creating fold equity to win the pot without showdown). Since you have next to no fold ewuity here, this makes the shove worse.

As for how I'd play, I think I fold here, eventhough it seems very weak, I don't expect to get much more value if I do hit my straight, and I don't expect to have a lot of equity other than the straightdraw (maybe another 10, however even that wouldn't fully satisfy me playing postflop and facing another big bet).

Calling seems best here, as was mentioned jamming 65bbs to win 10% of your stack is not ideal. Call and evaluate is a better line IMO. There's just too much information indicating that villain probably wont fold to your shove.

Come on guys it's not 10% of his stack. Given the alternative is calling then there is nearly 24 in the pot and he is jamming another 57 on top. It is still an overshove though - if you had flopped a straight you would raise to about 23-24BBs so the same sizing would be right with another hand.

I would just call this anyway.

In this kind of situation the main thing you have is a J - a medium strength hand good for checking and calling/bluff catching rather than a strong hand for value betting or a weak hand for bluffing. The reason you mostly check or call with medium strength hands is that any aggressive action just folds out weaker hands you were already beating anyway and puts in money behind to the stronger hands - whereas bets with the nuts get in money against weaker hands and bets with air hands can (sometimes) bluff out enough stronger hands to compensate for the times they get called.

Draws are secondary to hand strength - they are a way of deciding which weak hands to bluff and which to fold, and sometimes for which medium strength hands to fold and which to get stubborn with (as is the case in this hand where the draw probably influenced villain to look you up with top pair 3rd kicker - he could afford to be wrong more often).