yes

no

undecided

am i the only one intrigued with this subject? there has been much contraversey since forever. while it seems very likely that they exist, science demands tangible proof. my opinnion on this matter is severely swayed, but i want to get a general TB concencise. please play along and cast your anonomous vote. if you want to comment, feel free to explain your position Yea, Nea, or Undecided.

please chime in if anyone has any stories, theories, or general comments!

"New species" are found every once and a while.That's been documented.
Why not a creature like Sasquatch?
Sure, a lot of the "evidence" turns out to be hoaxed. That's how people are. Same with UFO's and Crop Circles.
I think there's more out there than we think there is.
I try to keep an open mind about such things, although I'm not a dreamer or an enthusiast on such matters.

"New species" are found every once and a while.That's been documented.
Why not a creature like Sasquatch?
Sure, a lot of the "evidence" turns out to be hoaxed. That's how people are. Same with UFO's and Crop Circles.
I think there's more out there than we think there is.
I try to keep an open mind about such things, although I'm not a dreamer or an enthusiast on such matters.

Click to expand...

Crop circles are done with ropes and planks of wood. No mystery there.

UFO's? Yeah, there's plenty of debris zipping about the place up there...but spaceships? Nah.

Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. "Run, he's fuzzy, get out of here"

Sasquatch is roughly the size of a bear. We know bears exist because they leave remains, both modern and archaeological. You can find all sorts of bear bones throughout the history of North America, even a few bear carcasses.

No such record exists of the sasquatch. I find it hard to believe there's megafauna walking around in North America that we can find no fossil record of nor current proof of existence, and that said population would have sufficient numbers to avoid extinction.

Sasquatch is roughly the size of a bear. We know bears exist because they leave remains, both modern and archaeological. You can find all sorts of bear bones throughout the history of North America, even a few bear carcasses.

No such record exists of the sasquatch. I find it hard to believe there's megafauna walking around in North America that we can find no fossil record of nor current proof of existence, and that said population would have sufficient numbers to avoid extinction.

Sasquatch is roughly the size of a bear. We know bears exist because they leave remains, both modern and archaeological. You can find all sorts of bear bones throughout the history of North America, even a few bear carcasses.

No such record exists of the sasquatch. I find it hard to believe there's megafauna walking around in North America that we can find no fossil record of nor current proof of existence, and that said population would have sufficient numbers to avoid extinction.

Sasquatch is roughly the size of a bear. We know bears exist because they leave remains, both modern and archaeological. You can find all sorts of bear bones throughout the history of North America, even a few bear carcasses.

No such record exists of the sasquatch. I find it hard to believe there's megafauna walking around in North America that we can find no fossil record of nor current proof of existence, and that said population would have sufficient numbers to avoid extinction.

am i the only one intrigued with this subject? there has been much contraversey since forever. while it seems very likely that they exist, science demands tangible proof. my opinnion on this matter is severely swayed, but i want to get a general TB concencise. please play along and cast your anonomous vote. if you want to comment, feel free to explain your position Yea, Nea, or Undecided.

please chime in if anyone has any stories, theories, or general comments!