UT to Supreme Court: We Need Affirmative Action

In an effort to defend its use of affirmative action, the University of Texas at Austin argued to the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday that it needs to consider race in admissions if it wants a diverse, representative student body.

The University of Texas at Austin needs to consider race in admissions if it wants a diverse, representative student body, the school told the U.S. Supreme Court 0n Monday in a 70-page brief filed in advance of oral arguments in the case Fisher v. The University of Texas at Austin.

The nation's high court will hear arguments in the case, which could bring an end to affirmative action at UT-Austin, this December.

The school was sued in 2008 by Abigail Fisher, who argued she was denied admission to UT-Austin because she is white. Her case has already reached the Supreme Court once. In that iteration, the court upheld the use of affirmative action nationwide but asked a lower court to scrutinize UT-Austin's policy. The lower court upheld the school's use of race in admissions, and the Supreme Court now is reviewing that ruling.

In Monday’s brief, UT-Austin cites its troubled racial history, noting that a black student wasn’t admitted to the school until 1950. The school also stresses that race is still an issue on campus today. This year, the school noted, UT-Austin became embroiled in a debate about the future of an on-campus statue of Confederate President Jefferson Davis. The statue was eventually removed from its prominent location and will be housed in a U.S. history center instead.

“UT’s student body brought many different viewpoints to that debate, and this event is just one of many constant reminders that race remains relevant in Austin, as in America, today,” the brief says.

That’s just one case in which diversity was valuable on campus, the school said.

“The educational benefits of diversity include, but are not limited to, bringing unique and direct perspectives to the issues and topics discussed and debated in classrooms, promoting cross-racial understanding, breaking down racial and ethnic stereotypes, and creating an environment in which students do not feel like spokespersons for their race,” the brief says.

The last time the Supreme Court heard the case, it ruled that schools may use affirmative action, but only if they can show that race-neutral policies don’t do the job of diversifying their student bodies. UT-Austin’s opponents have argued that the school does have a sufficient race-neutral policy: the top 10 percent rule.

Created in 1997, soon after affirmative action was temporarily banned in the state, the rule required state schools to admit students who graduated in the top 10 percent of their high school class, regardless of test scores or other factors. That helped increase racial diversity because Texas high schools are still largely segregated.

But UT-Austin argued that relying solely on that rule “excludes consideration of the broad array of factors that contribute to a genuinely diverse student body.” The school wants people with varied skills and backgrounds, not simply people of different races, the brief said.

Fisher’s lawyers have disputed that argument, saying the top 10 percent rule has been successful. Her lawyers also suggested that UT-Austin simply wants to be able to admit more rich minorities, rather than minorities from schools in economically disadvantaged areas.

UT-Austin disagrees.

“She has a dim view of success — and diversity,” the brief says.

Right now, UT-Austin caps the number of students automatically admitted at 75 percent of each freshman class. Next year, that means that students who finished in the top 7 percent of their classes will be automatically admitted. The rest of UT-Austin students will be admitted under what the school calls its “holistic review process,” which considers extracurricular activities, non-academic accomplishments, race and more.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case sometime next year.

Disclosure: The University of Texas at Austin is a corporate sponsor of The Texas Tribune. A complete list of Tribune donors and sponsors can be viewed here.

Like this story?

Comment Policy

The Texas Tribune is pleased to provide the opportunity for you to share your observations about this story. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask that you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or wandering away from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of the Tribune, and your user name will be displayed. Thanks for taking time to offer your thoughts.