It’s Nelson Rockefeller’s Party

Bill Buckley has been a writer and a player to be reckoned with in the Republican tong wars going back to Robert “Mr. Republican” Taft vs. Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952. He stood with Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan in battle with the Rockefeller faction of the party through the 1970s.

So I asked him: How did the famously divided Republicans–Russell Baker once described them as a bird that was “all wings, and no body”–come to a simulation of unity behind George W. Bush? And just which tree do President Bush and this convention fall out of?

Listen for yourself and judge whether Bill Buckley’s tone suggests triumph or disappointment in his heart of hearts.

“It falls,” he responds to my question, “in the line of a Republican Party not fraught by any serious internal division, or even tension. It’s not Rockefeller vs. Goldwater or Reagan vs. Rockefeller. It is more or less: ‘whose turn is it?’ And in that sense it represents a party that really hasn’t found any missionary excitement of the kind that identifies the leader with a body of thought that’s either gestating or received as common wisdom.

“In other words, I think that the Republican nominee of four years ago and this year is not an exciting ideological figure. He is rather a senior figure who prevailed in traditional ways. I don’t think Mr. Bush will be thought of as a Reagan or a Senator Taft.”

That is not just putting it mildly, I reply, it’s getting it wrong.

I volunteer to Bill Buckley that it seems clear in hindsight that the old casting of Rockefeller “moderates” and Reaganite “extremists” in the Republican party was a basic misconstruction, aided in no small part by the Rockefeller clout in the media and at the New York Times in particular.

In real life we got to know Ronald Reagan as rather a gentle and available Main St. cowboy, a populist for the well-to-do, a phlegmatic character with quasi-isolationist “fortress America” instincts. He was open and clear about his anti-Communist foreign policy. Yes, he was a sneaky bully in Central America, but he was extremely cautious in action otherwise.

It’s the Rockefeller instincts I never stop worrying about. Drawing on the power of oil and Wall Street with the personal entitlement that comes of almost infinite inherited wealth, the Rockefeller instincts are compounded with secrecy, overfamiliarity with nuclear weapons and the CIA, and a possessive outlook on the whole world.

It’s the Rockefeller instincts, I argue, that led the bungling Bush administration into Iraq and fed the fantasy of an easy police action in a far outpost of empire. It’s the old Rockefeller instincts that are still trying to euphemize and legitimize aggressive blunders that Ronald Reagan would never have committed.

Ronald Reagan’s “victory” in the Cold War and his emergence as a hero in Russia and Eastern Europe doubtless inspired George Bush’s crazy dream of being seen someday as the “liberator” of Arab Muslims. But Bush missed the point by a mile. Ronald Reagan never bombed Warsaw or Petersburg or Moscow. He’d have lost the Cold War if he had. And he would surely have cautioned George Bush: Well, son…you won’t win anything of value, even against Saddam Hussein, by bombing the Cradle of Civilization.

I had my own odd epiphany about Ronald Reagan around the time of the Soviet assault on Afghanistan and the Iran hostage crisis in 1979, at the start of the 1980 presidential campaign. Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, a longtime Rockefeller protege, had posed with a rifle in the Khyber Pass, in effect warning the Russians not even to think about approaching the Persian Gulf. Other old Rockefeller hands, notably Henry Kissinger and James Schlesinger, were muttering hints at the same time that the United States might have to use to nuclear weapons to defend our oil lifeline. But Ronald Reagan had an altogether different and explicitly anti-nuclear line. We might have to quarantine Cuba in response to a Russian mischief in the Gulf, Reagan said. But wasn’t it wonderful, he added, that we had more oil under Alaska than existed in all of the Middle East! Reagan was being his fanciful Hollywood self, of course, about that Alaskan oil, but he was also revealing his continental and defensive reflexes about American power, altogether different from Nelson Rockefeller’s. A Bill Buckley anecdote confirms my sentimental weakness for the late Ronnie as a crypto-peacenik: Colin Powell remarked not long ago, Buckley says, that “of all the people he ever worked with, he never ran into anybody who despised nuclear weapons the way Ronald Reagan did.”

I am remembering another epiphany as a New York Times reporter watching Nelson Rockefeller at a bizarre moment in 1976. He was a lame-duck vice president, having been chosen by the accidental President Gerald Ford, then dumped as a running mate in favor of Bob Dole. Late in the 1976 campaign, it was Rockefeller’s awkward and humilitating duty to show Dole around New York State. On a state university campus in Westchester County, students turned out en masse, not to cheer Nelson Rockefeller but to remind the world of his role as governor in the Attica prison massacre in 1971. “Attica, Attica, no matter how you figger, Rocky pulled the trigger,” the students kept chanting, drowning out host Rockefeller and his guest Dole. Finally Rocky, at the end of his rope, gave the kids the finger–first one hand, then two. I called the Times desk in some amazement to say that Nelson Rockefeller was melting down before scores of cameras. But this was a picture that was never to run in the New York Times, and a story not quite fit to be printed in the paper of record. Not about Nelson Rockefeller anyway.

Rockefeller had power beyond imagining. His sway at Times was the least of it, perhaps, but we felt the vibrations, often with a chill of embarrassment. On Rockefeller’s sudden death in his midtown Manhattan apartment in 1979, the marvellous James Reston reduced himself to writing in a page-one obituary appreciation that it was fitting that his friend had died in quiet contemplation of his personal art collection, though it soon developed that in fact Rocky had his fatal heart attack in the saddle with a girlfriend. A great ex-Times reporter, Richard Reeves, tells of a time in the late 1960s when New York was ablaze with race riots and Governor Rockefeller was missing for weeks. Reeves finally located him on World Bank president Eugene Black’s island estate in the Mediterranean, whereupon Black, a member of the Times board, called the Times publisher to say: Governor Rockefeller was not to be disturbed! For the Times I covered Rockefeller’s elevation to the vice presidency in 1974. Dick Reeves’ joke at the time was: “Chris, don’t worry about ‘confict of interest’ issues–Rocky’s putting Venezuela into a blind trust.”

I feel a resonance of that ancient history inside this tight little Bush bubble of a convention in the militarized bunker of Madison Square Garden. The atmosphere in New York feels to me Rockefellerish, in a word. It’s not so much that, as Kevin Phillips has written, “The Bushes’ ties to John D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil go back 100 years.” It is rather the impenetrable and impervious arrogance of Bush power. (Kevin Phillips again, on the Bushes: “I get a sense… that this is not a family that has a particularly strong commitment to American democracy. Its sense of how to win elections comes out of a CIA manual, not out of the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution.”) It is also the deep insulation that most of the institutional media have given President Bush and his runaway misadventure in Iraq.

It’s just a few Republican veterans who say incisively what has happened to their party.

Ron Reagan Jr., for one, in Esquire: “Spin has long been the lingua franca of the political realm. But George W. Bush and his administration have taken “normal” mendacity to a startling new level far beyond lies of convenience. On top of the usual massaging of public perception, they traffic in big lies, indulge in any number of symptomatic small lies, and, ultimately, have come to embody dishonesty itself. They are a lie. And people, finally, have started catching on… My father, acting roles excepted, never pretended to be anyone but himself. His Republican party, furthermore, seems a far cry from the current model, with its cringing obeisance to the religious Right and its kill-anything-that-moves attack instincts. …Beyond issues of fiscal irresponsibility and ill-advised militarism, there is a question of trust. George W. Bush and his allies don’t trust you and me. Why on earth, then, should we trust them?”

Kevin Phillips, for another: “as far as I’m concerned, what the Bushes represent is just totally at loggerheads with everything from Abraham Lincoln down to McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt, to Eisenhower who warned about the military-industrial complex.”

And, clearest of all Pat Buchanan: “Under the rubric of conservatism, the Republican party of Bush I and II has been reinventing itself into what conservatives would have once recognized as a Rockefeller party reciting Reaganite rhetoric.”

In a forthcoming book of which I’ve seen only excerpts, WHERE THE RIGHT WENT WRONG: How Neoconservatives Subverted The Reagan Revolution And Hijacked the Bush Presidency, Buchanan forecasts: “[A] civil war is going to break out inside the Republican Party along the old trench lines of the Goldwater-Rockefeller wars of the 1960s, a war for the heart and soul and future of the party for the new century.”

The issue in that civil war, Pat, will be Empire. But that is a subject for another day.

Posted by lydondev on Wednesday, September 1, 2004, at 12:38 pm.Filed under Uncategorized.Follow any responses to this post with its comments RSS feed.Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

{ 276 } Comments

Thanks for giving me important new perspectives on the politics and principles of the GOP. I don’t “do” a lot of politics at my weblog, but I hope my readers will take a deter from haiku and legal-ethics issues and pay close attention to this posting.

as I wirte this I am hearing the RNC Bush acceptance speech full of implied turths that are false and talk of challenges faced..when we have yet to face the hardest challenges of all that lie ahead of us..

Would it be possible to contrast this wonderfull subject with the birth of the Republican party?

It would be interesting to see what struggles at the birth of the republican party still exist if at all..

There doesn’t seem to be any way to send email directly so…
I really love your Podcasts but the sound quality is REALLY POOR. The stereo mix is trashed by the mp3 compression which causes annoying channel flips, noise and distortion. Please either mix it down to mono or change your encoder settings.
Aloha,
Scott

there is soo much assosiated with the name of Rockefellers, it is wealth, political agenda, influence, economic governence, it is amazing how the spiral can demonize the personal, the good /bad world of mouth can trash the name of bring it up like appolo buster. In the Case of Rockefellers it is the dual forces working combined that creates a controversy even so many years after…

Wow, this was a really quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a lot and never seem to get something done.

Want leadership development training, leadership executive coaching, stress management training and leadership skills training, with up to 50% government funding See our website to find out more. Leadership Development Training

Well, I don’t really think there’s so much of a difference among “wings” when it comes to the Republican party anymore (unless you go too much to the religious right that is). It’s more a matter of candidates and personalities these days. Dean Kent repossessed car auctions news.

Yeah, I agree with you all guys. The amount of influence this person has is insane. I enjoyed reading the whole post and I’ve tweeted and bookmarked it as well.. I’m going to read this again and thanks harvard for creating such a useful resource on the web.

Great post. There’s a lot of nice info. I did want to let you know something though – I am running Fedora with the current of Firefox and the look and feel of your blog is kind of flaky for me. I can enjoy the articles, but the navigation doesn’t function so well.

I’ve been working as a medical assistant. I’ve started reading this whole blog and its becoming very interesting. The influence this guy has is great. I love interviews – trust me. I’ll let my friends know about this site. Thanks buddy!

This content price checking. I noticed the software well written and even comfortably clear. I would like to i believe appreciation for an hour or two you spent to create this. My group is boastful in addition to look ahead to your future publish.

Pretty nice post. I saw a webpage with a article almost identical to this one a couple of hours ago. This post is a week older so I recon they have just copied and changed it. I’m not accusing you of copyright abuse it’s merely just it is out there. I can not recall the page, sorry (age thing)

I’ve been a follower of Christopher Lydon from a few years now.. and the quality he produces is simply outstanding. I’ve been reading other harvard blogs lately and researching more on this topic – you definitely were a great help.. Bookmarked.. and thanks!

Reading this reminds me of my old room mate. That guy was one of the smartest persons I know, but he was a little odd for my tastes though. Anyways I enjoyed reading this, thanks. Will give me something to go into when I see him.

Besides its style and function, another reason why I take a fancy to this bag is its name, Naxos. Naxos is the largest and most fertile of the Cyclades and famous for the impressive mountainous landscapes, many isolated traditional villages where people still wear traditional dress, weave on old looms and live off the fruit of the land, some of Europe’s most beautiful golden sandy beaches.

Naxos is also a charming capital with old churches, monasteries and Venetian castles and homes. Its name, the beautiful landscape as well as the legendary stories behind Naxos add the some mysterious colors into the stylish handbag.

Reading this reminds me of my old room mate. That guy was one of the smartest persons I know, but he was a little odd for my tastes though. Anyways I enjoyed reading this, thanks. Will give me something to go into when I see him.

Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” by George Bernard Shaw.

Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” by George Bernard Shaw.

Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” by George Bernard Shaw.

Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! “England and America are two countries separated by the same language.” by George Bernard Shaw. iPad 2 Black Friday Deals Special Price Now!

Naxos is the largest and most fertile of the Cyclades and famous for the impressive mountainous landscapes, many isolated traditional villages where people still wear traditional dress, weave on old looms and live off the fruit of the land, some of Europe’s most beautiful golden sandy beaches.

With almost everything which appears to be developing throughout this area, your opinions happen to be fairly radical. Having said that, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your whole plan, all be it stimulating none the less. It seems to me that your remarks are actually not completely rationalized and in fact you are generally yourself not totally confident of the point. In any event I did take pleasure in reading through it.
I do enjoy the manner in which you have framed this problem plus it really does present me personally a lot of fodder for consideration. Nonetheless, coming from just what I have observed, I just hope as the feedback pack on that folks remain on issue and in no way embark upon a soap box of some other news of the day. All the same, thank you for this exceptional piece and though I do not necessarily agree with this in totality, I regard your standpoint.
Just about all of what you claim happens to be supprisingly accurate and that makes me ponder why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. Your piece truly did turn the light on for me personally as far as this specific topic goes. Nevertheless at this time there is actually one position I am not too comfortable with and while I attempt to reconcile that with the actual central idea of your issue, allow me observe exactly what all the rest of your subscribers have to say.Well done.
The heart of your writing whilst sounding reasonable initially, did not settle properly with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you managed to make me a believer but only for a while. I however have got a problem with your leaps in assumptions and you would do nicely to help fill in those gaps. In the event you can accomplish that, I will undoubtedly be amazed.
In this awesome scheme of things you actually secure a B+ just for hard work. Where exactly you actually misplaced me personally was on all the details. You know, they say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be more correct at this point. Having said that, allow me tell you what did give good results. The article (parts of it) is actually very powerful which is probably why I am making an effort to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, despite the fact that I can easily notice the jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily convinced of exactly how you appear to connect the points that make the conclusion. For the moment I will, no doubt yield to your position however wish in the future you actually link your dots much better.

Wonderful job right here. I really enjoyed what you had to say. Keep heading because you surely bring a new voice to this subject. Not many people would say what youve said and still make it interesting. Nicely, at least Im interested. Cant wait to see much more of this from you.

Wonderful job right here. I really enjoyed what you had to say. Keep heading because you surely bring a new voice to this subject. Not many people would say what youve said and still make it interesting. Nicely, at least Im interested. Cant wait to see much more of this from you.

Great post. There’s a lot of nice info. I did want to let you know something though – I am running Fedora with the current of Firefox and the look and feel of your blog is kind of flaky for me. I can enjoy the articles, but the navigation doesn’t function so well.

Wonderful job right here. I really enjoyed what you had to say. Keep heading because you surely bring a new voice to this subject. Not many people would say what youve said and still make it interesting. Nicely, at least Im interested. Cant wait to see much more of this from you.

I m always Looking for these kind of stuff, Sharing these kind of information is really helpful to all.Your blog is really nice simple and always provide valuable information to all users.Thanks a lot !

i am just commenting in your blog because i realy enjoy this article. and it think you will gonna like to read mine. it is a fresh and new site about currency exchange. it is writed by me and my wife. i hope you enjoy and please leave a comment there with your website link. that way i know it was you

I heard the fact is that in US, English will become a minority language in twenty years. By then then Spanish will be the main language.I also think that the English language is very important especially in the economy. Some good points made, however there are two valid sides to this arguement so I’m not sure I completely agree.

We truly recognize your weblog post. You will uncover a multitude of approaches we could set it to proper use with minimum amount effort with time and challenging attained cash. Thank you so a lot regarding supporting have the post give light to several concerns we have had ahead of now.

I just want to let everyone know I have tested out the pots/pans for quite a few months now. They heat evenly and fast with NO warping, clean up is a breeze and handles stay cool to touch. I absolutely love these pots/pans and they seem to be holding up nicely so far. I know these pots/pans are not very heavy but it makes handling them easier.

{ 4 } Trackbacks

[...] the nod because it was ‘their turn’. here’s none other than william f. buckley on the subject… Christopher Lydon Interviews… : It’s Nelson Rockefeller’s Party __________________ "The choice in this election is clear. These times require more than a [...]