Readers Are Fundamental

What else would you call someone who reads?

I was all set to wax rhapsodic here about my iPad, how much I’m enjoying my new toy (and it is a toy, I know), how quickly I got to the point of loving the “app” idea for its convenience and speed, how interesting it is that I’ve started to begrudge using the web at times, and how hard it is to find apps I might like without knowing what I am looking for in the Apple App Store (which is a classic search/recommendation problem).

Events, however, piled on top of one another and subverted my plans. First, I saw the fascinating results of a poll on Stephen’s Lighthouse (Stephen Abram’s must-read blog), where he asked what we should call people who read the e-versions of books. A dramatically split decision, with respondents favoring “digital readers,” “e-readers,” “ebook readers,” “mobile readers,” and several other more exotic options. (“Nonprint readers”? Seriously?) The intriguing aspect for me was not the specific responses so much as their wide variety without a clear consensus, from which I infer we haven’t figured this out yet.

Then came word of the untimely death of Michael Hart, the founder and driving force of Project Gutenberg (and of course, of Steve Jobs, who I wrote about here). For 40 years—yes, 40 years—Michael worked tirelessly to make digital versions of books freely available online, often one keystroke at a time. Michael was many things—fanatically absorbed in his work and his cause, a provocateur, and sometimes, to be honest, a pain in the ass. His passing is a sadness, his voice will be missed, and the ideas he pushed will no doubt live for generations to come.

And then, like a thunderclap, we heard the news of the lawsuit pitting what appears to be every author in the world against the Google libraries and the HathiTrust for copyright violation. I didn’t see this coming; in fact, in preparing for my course this fall in which we discuss the evolution of the book, I had largely put aside the Google Books litigation sideshow because nothing was happening. Oops.

The common thread here is reading, and how we define it. I wouldn’t even say “redefinition” because innovations have come and gone, from the second-century codex to medieval word separation and silent reading, right up to today, and reading follows quite naturally and seamlessly along. Only a generation ago, audiobooks weren’t always regarded as reading, per se, and even today, graphic novels raise a few eyebrows among those who don’t consider the format “serious” reading.

Stephen’s poll, intentionally or not, didn’t include one obvious option: “readers.” His blog’s (ahem) readers stepped right up and plugged it in as a write-in candidate, and several commenters followed suit. For my money, this is the only viable name for the consumption of written words; all the others come across as clumsy and already dated.

Can we all just spare one another the endless discussion and get on with the important stuff? Authors and publishers already get it: The ways in which stories are displayed come and go; what matters is the story and the storytelling. (And the royalties and rights management, apparently.)

I believe that what many saw as Michael’s lack of tolerance of people who didn’t share his ideas or points of view was actually a display of his impatience with delays in what he saw so clearly as the necessary work to be done. Everyone involved can agree that while the parade of technologies never ends and in fact accelerates, the power of the stories and the ideas behind them will never ebb . . . but that’s yet another story.

JOSEPH JANES is associate professor at the Information School of the University of Washington.

Share

Tagged Under

Related Articles

Intended to offer suggestions for anyone, regardless of musical training or experience, who is seeking to develop music collections in libraries of all kinds, A Basic Music Library: Essential Scores and Sound Recordings, Fourth Edition, Volume 2: World Music, published by ALA Editions, remains a benchmark of its kind. Prepared by Music Library Association, volume 2 concentrates on folk and traditional music of North America; traditional and popular music of the Americas and the Caribbean; music of Asia and Oceania; music of Northern Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia; music of sub-Saharan Africa; music of Europe; and international anthologies.

About 20 students at the University of Oregon in Eugene silently protested murals at Knight Library on February 14. Individuals from the group said that the murals were racist, citing lines from one mural, The Mission of a University, which read: “It means conservation and betterment not merely of our national resources but also of our racial heritage and opportunity to the lowliest.” Protesters held signs reading “Take it down or we will” and “Hate is not heritage.”

John Eggerton writes: “Anchor institutions say they have a plan for closing the digital rural divide, and expanding access to TV white spaces is a big part of it. In announcing a ‘To and Through Anchors’ branded strategy, the Schools, Health, and Libraries Broadband Coalition says that it would cost between $13 and $19 billion to connect every anchor institutions—schools, libraries, community centers—in the country (excluding Alaska) with fiber, which in turn could help connect the vast majority of unserved and underserved rural communities to high-speed broadband.”

Civil rights pioneer, Georgia congressman, and award-winning author John Lewis will continue his March series of graphic novels with a new multipart book called Run. The series will tell the next chapter of civil rights history, including Lewis’s leadership of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. Lewis will team up again with March coauthor Andrew Aydin, and the series will feature a new artist, Afua Richardson, as well as contributions from original artist Nate Powell. The first book will be available August 18 from Abrams ComicArts.

Lynsay WIlliams writes: “For university libraries, it can sometimes be difficult to get students—especially new students—comfortable with coming into the library and engaging with library staff. We asked some academic librarians how they get creative with their student outreach to welcome students to campus and to the library.”

Sarah Laskow writes: “On any given day, from her home on the Isle of Man, Linda Watson might be reading a handwritten letter from one Confederate soldier to another, or a list of convicts transported to Australia. Or perhaps she is reading a will, a brief from a long-forgotten legal case, an original Jane Austen manuscript. Whatever is in them, these documents made their way to her because they have one thing in common: They are close to impossible to read.”

Kate MacMillan writes: “Looking at the Oxford Dictionary’s shortlist for 2017 word of the year, I was startled by the words white fragility. According to the Oxford Dictionary Blog, white fragility is ‘a mass noun that describes the discomfort and defensiveness on the part of a white person when confronted about racial inequality and injustice.’ It is a contentious word and one that some in the school library struggle with in dealing with their student populations.”