Japan's Massive Earthquake

The earthquake and tsunami obliterates everything

On The date of the earthquake and subsequent tsunami was Friday, March 11, 2011. This translates to the Hebrew date
5th of Adar II 5771. The possibility table for our experiment is shown below.
All multiple key words descriptions like רעש גדול
were tried as a key word phrase רעשגדול,
meaning that not only were they tried as separate key words for which one ELS for each of the key words must appear in the table,
but they were tried as a string of characters without spaces. The only key word phrases listed in possibility table are those
key word phrases that had ELSs in the Torah.

The key word phrase הרס רב has one of its key wordw with only two letters.
Two letter key words are not permitted under our protocol and so only the key word phrase
הרסרב appears in the possibility table.

The possibility table for the Japan Experiment

We organize the results according to the p-value of the individual tables from the smallest p-value to the largest p-value
less than or equal to 15/10,000. The best table had a p-value of 2.5/1,000,000. It has key words which form the basis of the sentence:
Earthquake (in) Japan: Atomic meltdown 5th of Adar II. March 11 corresponds to the Hebrew 5th of Adar II.
What is interesting is that the news stories of a few days after the earthquake expressed concern
about keeping a meltdown from happening, but there was no information that a meltdown had happened.
It was not until around May 24 that TEPCO provided information that a meltdown had in fact occurred
soon after the tsunami in three of the reactors.

From the key word combination possibilities that were explored, there resulted 25 tables that can be clustered
into 11 substantially different places and with substantially different cylinder sizes.
We label these clusters A through K. This webpage shows the first 12 of these 25 tables.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 2355. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 2.5/1,000,000. The cluster A table spans from Genesis 30:20 through Genesis 37:2.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 2359. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 1.5/100,000. The cluster A table spans from Genesis 30:19 through Genesis 37:2.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 45. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 7.5/100,000. The cluster B table spans from Numbers 28:23 through Numbers 29:20.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 1727. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 8.5/100,000. The cluster C table spans from Numbers 4:49 through Deuteronomy 13:6.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 45. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 9.5/100,000. The cluster B table spans from Numbers 28:30 through Numbers 29:20.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 2173. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 19.5/100,000. The D table spans from Exodus 29:8 through Numbers 10:12.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 1727. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 20.5/100,000. The C table spans from Numbers 4:49 through Deuteuronmy 13:6.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 1727. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 20.5/100,000. The cluster E table spans from Leviticus 14:20 through Deuteronomy 13:6.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 58. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 23.5/100,000. The cluser F table spans from Genesis 39:10 through Genesis 41:39.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 1727. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 27.5/100,000. The cluster Ctable spans from Numbers 4:49 through Deuteronomy 13:6.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 1727. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 36.5/100,000. The cluster C table spans from Numbers 4:49 through Deuteronomy 13:6.

With expected number of ELSs set to 100, the automatic search found a cylinder size of 1727. The probability
of a text from the ELS random placement text population producing a table as compact as the one produced
by the Torah text is 36.5/100,000. The cluster E table spans from Leviticus 14:20 through Deuteronomy 13:6.