When the game kicked off and Chelsea kept the ball bouncing around their defence for 1 solid minute I felt a cold sense of dread as I expected a dour game of Football as Liverpool would kill the game by sitting behind the ball. I was wrong, whilst the plan was to allow the Chelsea back line (and Mikel) on the ball the rest of the team would be hussled and harried all over the pitch. I thought Kuyt would be on the right, he wasn’t. He popped up ‘in the hole’ and played off Torres whilst providing the Energy in the middle of the park to keep Ramires (one word, woeful) off balance whilst allowing Lucas and Gerrard to keep Florent Malouda quiet. It was a terrific team effort and showed a cohesion and unison that had been hitherto missing.

Also, I didn’t expect to see young Martin Kelly in the line-up which was as brave as it was successful. With Malouda being choked in midfield, Kelly and Meireles (nominally on the right) kept Zhirkov and Ashley Cole quiet, which was a truly remarkable achievement given his particular form this season. Throwing the young Englishman into a match against the Champions could’ve easily back-fired and left Hodgson in the lurch. It wasn’t the only brave decision that Hodgson has taken over the past fortnight – his decision to leave Torres and Gerrard out in Naples was justified by the result as was putting his captain on the bench for the return leg. It has been said that it is better to be lucky than good but there is no luck involved so far in this Anfield turn-around.

In terms of the match itself it was (sigh) a game of two halves – the first Liverpool showed verve and dynamism during the game. Martin Kelly was encouraged to get forward and Kuyt exploited the space he was afforded to exquisite effect as he released Torres. The second goal came from a similar position as the much maligned – by me – Raul Meireles was in the same position but laid the ball off to Torres. In the second half the tables were turned, Didier Drogba’s introduction coincided with a ‘you shall not pass’ performance from Liverpool’s defence and midfield. Helped by the ever-excellent Pepe Reina, whose stop from Malouda was only eclipsed by Cech’s later save, Reina has and always will be key this season if only he had captured that ball on opening day(without his lone mistake, Liverpool would be joint fifth).

Of course, all this Liverpool talk takes out of the equation the other team on Sunday. If this was Liverpool’s best performance of the season (almost certainly so) then it was Chelsea’s worst. The forced omission of Drogba (reports of a fever) and the continued absence of Essien and Lampard stripped Chelsea of any industry in midfield, Ramires looks a very good player when he has time but he was roughed up on Sunday to good effect, something that would not work on Essien. Nicolas Anelka continues to be a riddle inside a mystery wrapped in an enigma. On the right side of an attack he can drift in an out of a game but as the central attacker he needs to be more disciplined and going up against a fired-up Jamie Carragher he was ineffective to say the least. However he was Fernando Torres in comparison to Salmon Kalou whose completely inept display rivalled only that of Theo Walcott over the weekend for record breaking futility.

Speaking of ‘El Nino’, this really couldn’t be an analysis without the temperamental Spaniard. Channelling the form of the striker who burst onto the Anfield scene against, who else, Chelsea. Torres picked apart the Chelsea rear-guard, on a day that John Terry would like to forget, he hussled and harried and generally looked like he was fit. His omission from the Europa League has been a success as he really hasn’t been ready for two games a week; in fact he was barely ready for one game. If he continues this level of fitness his form will continue, look at the picture at the top is that a man dissatisfied with his club? For me, he has been carrying an injury rather than being unsettled (of course I thought that about Rooney).

Finally, how is this winning the Liverpool way, well as I indicated earlier I’ve written about Liverpool before this season and had this to say:

“On the player front Liverpool still rely (too) heavily on three players. Steven Gerrard ( who is now playing better for his country than his club), Fernando Torres (who is far from his imperious best) and Pepe Reina”

Perhaps I can add Dirk Kuyt to that list but the point remains salient, Liverpool are relying heavily on their very best players (then again who isn’t) but until now they had not been performing. In one match it all clicked, Liverpool took the lead through Torres and then showed the defensive resilience which has not been evident until now either. Under Benitez this was Liverpool’s forté, relying on Torres, Gerrard and at one point Alonso to unlock defences whilst relying on Finnan, Carragher and Hyypia to be consistently solid at the back. This was the form that led them to a European Cup and to second in the league. A lack of investment strangled the quality out of the squad so only the core remains. The players have changed, the squad is thinner but the future looks brighter for Liverpool fans.

Yesterday, the formation had changed, the team has been refined and more importantly form and confidence has been restored. Whether this is due to new ownership, a time to adjust to Roy and his training or just a regression to the mean (Liverpool couldn’t be that bad all the time). Whether this positivity is as ‘knee-jerk’ as the negativity was earlier in the season, only time will tell. For me though the changes have been made since St. Andrews, they’ve worked and there is only one man to take credit for that, Roy Hodgson.

About The Author

15 Comments

Liverpool’s win yesterday, and return to form over the past several weeks, are due to a very simple fact: Fernando Torres is looking more like Fernando Torres again and less like Fernando Llamas (although he did indeed look “mahvelous” yesterday).

Can anyone doubt that El Nino’s play over the last 3-4 games has been much sharper? It’s 2008 all over again, and Chelsea yesterday faced the ghost of Liverpool past — not Liverpool present, although maybe Liverpool future, if Torres remains sharp — with Fernando Torres showing the kind of touch and form he’s found hard to muster over the past two seasons. This was vintage stuff, and and Chelsea have to feel hard done by to have witnessed the Spaniard’s Lasarus-like revival first hand.

Yes, Torres is key – as any world class player is – but his recuperation has been tricky. Confidence dashed by being hampered by his hamstring it took great man management to stick by him and push him out week on week to get his body and mind back. Again, all woy and i’m a woy doubter.

Kids, Liverpool’s resurgence is simple. Listen up: it’s all about the Red Sox!! They haven’t lost since John Henry took over, and they just may never lose again–ever!! I hear they’re bringing in a 37-foot wall at Anfield, putting seats atop the wall and selling advertising space. The revenue will crash the debt and bring in new players. Call the Kops! Liverpool is back. http://bit.ly/djA9zP

This isn’t a treatise on Liverpool being super-mega-awesome now, rather that since St. Andrews a lot of positive steps have been taken. Liverpool cannot win every game this season playing that way but they adapted to the game to win. Something Rafa did constantly in Europe. Thus this was winning, the Liverpool way.

I get your point, Chris. But I wasn’t making a comment about the article or contesting your point.

My comment was to Vious and like-minded individuals that have colours blind them from objectively looking at a performance. Since we won, we’re over-reacting and Liverpool were lucky. If we had lost, we are also crap. Either way, there’s no winning.

As to the actual article, I agree Roy gets all the credit and have been a huge proponent of him since his installation as manager (though it’s been hard to defend him at times). I agree that Liverpool and Roy need to adapt to games but also think in every match he needs to continue to push the side to be positive and always looking for our big players (like in this game) rather than holding possession and going backwards (as we have done mostly this season).

Kelly only played because Agger, Kyriakos and Johnson were unavailable. I thought he was excellent and hope he gets more chances and forces Johnson to up his game considerable if he wants his spot back.
I also hope Roy hears the constant mentions of youth and young coming from the new owners and calls upon Kelly, Shelvey, Spearing and Wilson on a more regular basis.

Agreed. As satisfying as Torre’s exquisite goals might be, if I were a Liverpool supporter I’d be more interested in (1) the hiring of Comolli and (2) seeing Hodgson doing an about face and suddenly playing the likes of Kelly, Jonjo, Spearing, and Wilson. LFC isn’t in the relegation heap and they probably won’t ever be. Torres can score 40+ goals in a season if he is healthy, but that isn’t going to return LFC to English champions. Top class football directors like Comolli and the intelligent embrace of academies & youth might.