Results are on the screen.
I see. It would be nice to have a file too...
OK, Ill add that tto the next version...
Bob
>>>mwrobertson at comcast.net 2/24/05 1:54:06 PM >>>
Bob,
I do not get a text file of the results! Once I know it asked for a
file
name, but only once, and it did not produce a file even then??
Robbie
Robert Bruninga wrote:
> I ran APRStest.exe on a TNC file from North Carolina and
> it shows:
>> 40% using the new NCn-N but only 16% of packets
> 27% using W,W,W,W,W but consuming 42% of all packets
> 37% using W, W, W, W but consuming 19% of all packets
> 8% using W, W but consuming 9% of all packets
>> Showing the NCn-N packets as much more efficient
> than the others. The 4 hop W,W,W,W path seems
> to be similarly "efficient", but then also remember that
> as the QRM level goes up that the number of packets
> copied actually goes down, so this messes up the
> statistics quite a bit for large W,W,W,W type hops..
>> I posted a NEW APRSTEST.EXE since the previous one
> did not account for SSn-N paths. This one works fine
> with UIview log files too. The link is about 30% down the
> New n-N paradigm page:
>>http://web.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html>> Bob
>>> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at lists.tapr.org>https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig>>
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.orghttps://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig