If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

1st. Supreme Court has not ruled on that yet. That was federal courts from liberal states that will probably be disbarred.

Iirc, 2 of the 4 judges that ruled on the first ban were conservatives. Not sure about the 2nd ban.

4th. Obama bombed no one inside Syria

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
OMFG
*deep breaths*
*wipes tear away*
Holy **** man, you have to warn people before you do something like that.

In 2016, Obama dropped 26,171 bombs. The majority of those bombs were dropped in Iraq and Syria. One of the biggest criticisms that Republicans had on Obama was that he was was too liberal in his use of bombings and getting involved in foreign issues.

They reached a diplomatic solution. Syria agreed to turn over and destroy their chemical weapons. He didn't do "nothing". He tried to stay out of yet another foreign crisis like every/most Republicans wanted him to do.

1st. Supreme Court has not ruled on that yet. That was federal courts from liberal states that will probably be disbarred.

2nd. Obamacare took two years, Trump almost replaced it in two months but the bill needs some work.

3rd. Wall will be payed for by Mexican government. But it will take time and pressure on them to make them bend.

4th. Obama bombed no one inside Syria, he drew a red line and Assad crossed it. Obama did nothing. Lol

5th. We have so many missiles stock piled that 59 missiles isn't **** lol.

6th. Democrats are hypocrites to the core, is Trump a agent of Putin like they say or are you scared he is pissing them off? So confused at the stance of Democrats it seriously changes daily anymore. All Trump did was spank assad like a child putting him back in line. Unlike Obama who did well nothing about anything. ��

That's right. Trump has been threatening to take it to the Supreme court. Problem for Trump is this will likey change nothing as it will be either deadlocked in which case the lower court ruleing stands or it will not be taken up by the supreme court in which case the 9th circut decision stands. No one is going to be disbared and it stands almost no chance of being overturned.

The wall will not be paid for by Mexico. Even the POTUS has stopped using that line. He knows they won't and thats why that line isn't used anymore. It's complete B.S. fantasyland.

The republicans have had 8 years to get thier **** together to repeal and replace the ACA. Trump doesn't even want his name attached to it. He didn't and hasn't done ****. He's too busy being the most vacationy, golfy POTUS in U.S. presidental history.

Top republicans opposed striking Syria under Obama. Now that Trump has done it they praise the attack. Heck, we don't even have proof the Syrian government ordered the chemical attack. It makes no sense for Assad to do this and the only side that it benefits is the rebels and ISIS who Assad is fighting.

The U.S. military will ask for replacements. What, you think that was a freebie?

You mean a hypocrite like yourself that said Hillary was going to get us into a war with Russia and Trump would soothe relations which is a good thing and are now you are praising the attack and sticking it to Russia?
Trump is the biggest hypocrite of them all. Trump durring his campaign. " The U.S. cannot be the policeman of the world" Many examples to show it. Why do you not hate him for it?

He is Putins pet. Notice that we have no smart assed tweet attacks from Trump pointed at Putin and Russia.

I have a feeling if Putin has more dirt besides golden showers on Trump we are about to see it.

BTW: If you don't think Obama tried to do the same thing in 2013 you need to follow this link.https://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/09/0....html?referer=
Difference is he tried to do it the way a U.S. president is supposed to ask for a military intervention. It was even in response to a chemical attack.

I do not think that American companies should use illegal immigrants for cheap labor. I think that doing such a thing reduces the amount of jobs that should be going to Americans who should get paid a fair amount for it. I think that hiring of illegals are bad for the economy and society.

I do not think that American companies should use illegal immigrants for cheap labor. I think that doing such a thing reduces the amount of jobs that should be going to Americans who should get paid a fair amount for it. I think that hiring of illegals are bad for the economy and society.

Well that's all fair and well, but would you be willing to accept the tripling, quadrupling or even quintupling of price in groceries that would come from that?
If you replace every single immigrant "slave" with a fairly paid American(but do note what "American" actually means, it includes all of South America and all of North America and stretches from Chile to Canada), If you'd pay US wages for every single of those that'd dramatically increase the price of the wares that those people produce because it's not like you'd see any real increase in productivity and they're going to pass the price increase off to the end customer.
It's either that or making US citizens work for the same slave wages that the immigrants do, and boy would that result in unions and strikes...

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day, Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.