Any woman who ever holds a man/men accountable for their violence/hatred/contempt to women is called ‘a man-hater.’ Men who routinely engage in women-hating are never called ‘women-haters.’ Why? Because male supremacy declares men are the default human and hence men have the right (sic) to dehumanise women. ‘Man-hating’ is a term commonly used by men and their supporters to try and silence women who challenge male domination and male control over women.

Men never purchase ‘sex’ rather they are purchasing the right (sic) to use women as disposable toilets/dehumanised masturbatory aids.

Male supremacy is never logical because male supremacy claims women are not human – as evidenced by innumerable sexualised insults men hurl at women and yet men who purchase strange women to use as masturbatory aids hold these women in contempt. So question is why do so many men who believe women are dehumanised sexual service stations want to thrust their penises into these ‘dehumanised, dirty (so men claim but fact is it is Johns who are ‘dirty and contaminated’) objects?

Doesn’t make sense but male supremacy has never been logical or rational.

Great video, thank you for posting this. I think Julie Bindel has a lovely speaking voice, excellent for delivering these lectures. She’s funny too, despite some of the horrific details in that lecture.

The link WOAJ gave is worth checking. You can see, in PDF, the powerpoint presentation that Julie used in this lecture.

The only thing that stops these guys is being prosecuted, and having their names published in the paper. We should go out in teams and videotape these guys and upload the pics to a website for public shaming.