Spartacus (Kirk Douglas) is a rebellious slave purchased by Lentulus Batiatus (Peter Ustinov), owner of a school for gladiators. For the entertainment of corrupt Roman senator Marcus Licinius Crassus (Laurence Olivier), Batiatus'… MoreSpartacus (Kirk Douglas) is a rebellious slave purchased by Lentulus Batiatus (Peter Ustinov), owner of a school for gladiators. For the entertainment of corrupt Roman senator Marcus Licinius Crassus (Laurence Olivier), Batiatus' gladiators are to stage a fight to the death. On the night before the event, the enslaved trainees are "rewarded" with female companionship. Spartacus' companion for the evening is Varinia (Jean Simmons), a slave from Brittania. When Spartacus later learns that Varinia has been sold to Crassus, he leads 78 fellow gladiators in revolt. Word of the rebellion spreads like wildfire, and soon Spartacus' army numbers in the hundreds. Escaping to join his cause is Varinia, who has fallen in love with Spartacus, and another of Crassus' house slaves, the sensitive Antoninus (Tony Curtis). The revolt becomes the principal cog in the wheel of a political struggle between Crassus and a more temperate senator named Gracchus (Charles Laughton). Anthony Mann was the original director of Spartacus, eventually replaced by Stanley Kubrick, who'd previously guided Douglas through Paths of Glory. The film received 4 Academy Awards, including Best Supporting Actor for Ustinov. A crucial scene between Olivier and Curtis, removed from the 1967 reissue because of its subtle homosexual implications, was restored in 1991, with a newly recorded soundtrack featuring Curtis as his younger self and Anthony Hopkins standing in for the deceased Olivier. ~ Hal Erickson, Rovi

The most courageous thing about it, from today's standards, is that it closes without an obligatory happy ending, and an audience that has watched for 187 minutes doesn't get a tidy, mindless conclusion.

While it suffers from some of the flaws of epics of this era-such as an overly sanitized portrait of life at the time, and anachronistic visions of fashion and lifestyle-Spartacus also boasts some stirring action and intelligent dialogue

The only film of which Kubrick did not have control, this sumptuous and forever influential sword-and-sandal epic balances quite well its campy moments with… MoreThe only film of which Kubrick did not have control, this sumptuous and forever influential sword-and-sandal epic balances quite well its campy moments with scenes of dramatic intensity, but also has a messy script full of moralizing and confusing behavior from most of its characters.

Lucas Martins

An early Stanley Kubrick masterpiece. Dispite doesn't present very much the style of the filmmaker. Fresh.

Reid Volk

While not the Kubrickian spectacle I was hoping for, a spectacle none the less. While it suffers from a ham fisted performance by Douglas and moments of… MoreWhile not the Kubrickian spectacle I was hoping for, a spectacle none the less. While it suffers from a ham fisted performance by Douglas and moments of nauseating sentiment, it also thrives on some well crafted battle scenes. This film feels big and I got to hand it to a young Kubrick for saving this once doomed production. While I would have loved to see Kubricks flare a little more throughout the film, Trumbo's anti-establishment message is well realized. In the grand scheme of things, it isn't my favorite of Kubricks. Yet, it is still an enjoyable watch if you can stomach the running time.

Tim Salmons

A very sweeping and dazzling epic with great acting moments, dazzling cinematography, and a great director in training. I feel like Braveheart is an echo of… MoreA very sweeping and dazzling epic with great acting moments, dazzling cinematography, and a great director in training. I feel like Braveheart is an echo of this film as it plays almost entirely the same way. Maybe Mel Gibson had this movie in mind, or maybe Randal Wallace did. Either way, it doesn't really matter. As with a lot of films, I felt it was a bit too long and some scenes felt a little extraneous and unneccesary, like the relationship berween Antoninus and Crassus. Not because of the gay thing, it just didn't really seem to add much to the overall plot of the thing and never really got a payoff, so I felt like it could've been taken out quite easily.

Alex roy

Stanley Kubrick's Spartacus is a defining classic that has withstood the test of time. Brilliantly acted and directed, this is one of the best epics that… MoreStanley Kubrick's Spartacus is a defining classic that has withstood the test of time. Brilliantly acted and directed, this is one of the best epics that combines action, drama and romance. This is a stunning work of cinematic genius that is a must see for cinema fans of all ages looking for a terrific, well acted and brilliantly directed film with rousing action, thrills and a compelling story. This is among Kubrick's greatest works. This is a majestic piece of cinema, and remains one of the standout classics along with such works as Ben- Hur and Lawrence of Arabia. This is an epic film that is grand in scale and scope. This is a picture that only Stanley Kubrick could have directed. With a terrific cast of outstanding talent, this is a powerful work that delivers exciting visuals, great battles and memorable performances. Kirk Douglas delivers on-screen and his role is among the most famous roles in the long history of cinema. This is a wonderful film that is sure to please cinema buffs everywhere and it is among the greatest films ever made as well. The film is truly entertaining from start to finish right up to the unforgettable climax. This epic has had a profound impact on genre films for years to come, and though no film has surpassed the greatness of Spartacus, many pictures have been influenced by Kubrick's classic. A brilliant, compelling and unforgettable film that is among the greatest films ever made. A must see for serious film fans. This film is worth watching for Kirk Douglas performance alone, and there's plenty of aspects that stand out about this work. Stanley Kubrick would aim bigger and better with this film, and it set the stage for future films in Kubrick's long and legendary career.

Chris Weber

While it is true that Kubrick never considered this to truly be one of his films, mostly because he didn't have full creative control, and it was primarily… MoreWhile it is true that Kubrick never considered this to truly be one of his films, mostly because he didn't have full creative control, and it was primarily a labor of love for producer and star Kirk Douglas (who had the most control over things, including hiring Kubrick), there's still many sequences, moments, and themes that fit in with Kubrick's oeuvrepretty nicely.
Based on a novel based on actual historical events, this is the story of a slave turned gladiator who becomes the leader of a major slave uprising during the era of the ancient ROman Republic. Spartacus is a good and noble man, and he's baically shown to be a Christ-like figure in a pre-Christ world. Yes, the movie takes liberties with history, but at the same time, it's a pretty glorious star studded Old Hollywood style epic, except that it's, you know, far more violent (surprisingly so for 1960), has plenty of political and sexual subtext (it was written author Dalton Trumbo who was infamously blacklisted), and just a few of the typical Kubrick trademarks such as a rich and distinct visual style, great cinematography and camera movement, and definite themes of alienation and dehumanization.
Kirk Douglas, who looks chiseled out of marble gives a commanding perforamnce here, albeit it comes off as a little more hammy at times than I remember. Then again, the last time I saw this was over the course of several days in my 7th grade history class...way before I was a film buff, or knew (or cared) about Kubrick and films as art. Still, he dfoes decently enough, and he's backed up by a stellar supporting cast that inlcudes Laurence Oliviver, Peter Ustinov, Charles Laughton, Tony Curtis, and Jean Simmons, all of whom put in some great work.
All in all, this is a decent enough film, but maybe not as great as I once thought. It's certainly not terrible, and calling it lesser Kubrick is no sin, but it just seems to drag here and there a little too often and comes off as trying a little too hard. If you want a historical film done by Kubrick that's fast(er) paced and more action oriented (though not as great) as Barry Lyndon, then give this a go.

Graham Jones

Kubrick steps into a new realm for his most epic film.

Jennifer D

HOLY LONGNESS. Maybe this was made as an offering to the Roman god of LONG FILMS. I, to be perfectly honest, found it fantastically boring. But I did like Tony… MoreHOLY LONGNESS. Maybe this was made as an offering to the Roman god of LONG FILMS. I, to be perfectly honest, found it fantastically boring. But I did like Tony Curtis. Even though he still spoke from New York. Bless the man. And I did like Charles Laughton as well as Peter Ustinov.
Sorry, not even I will fully redeem a film just because it's old and was directed by Kubrick.

Adriel Lim

A seminal classic of sorts. One that is of true, simple story about injustice, the absurd and of freedom. Quite the riveting movie with the fitting mood and… MoreA seminal classic of sorts. One that is of true, simple story about injustice, the absurd and of freedom. Quite the riveting movie with the fitting mood and atmosphere and elegant drama to drive its archetypal hero. It's both tragic and triumphant, and bravely courageous.

Jonathan Hutchings

Spartacus is like most Kirk Douglas vanity projects, only this time, it's longer, more overwrought, and wholly self-righteous. Douglas didn't get the… MoreSpartacus is like most Kirk Douglas vanity projects, only this time, it's longer, more overwrought, and wholly self-righteous. Douglas didn't get the lead in Ben-Hur, he pouted, and bought the film rights to Howard Fast's novel himself so he can be in an epic too. What a petulant child -- excuse me, what a petulant child, who's a horrible actor. The only redeeming quality is the strong supporting cast (Olivier, Ustinov, and Laughton, most notably). Kubrick's imprint is nowhere to be found, and really, can you blame him for wanting to distance himself from this film? If I wanted to watch a bloated lead character performance with broadly-drawn altruism and inane inspirational speeches, I'd go to a community theater production.

Zach Brehany

Hmm. Now this is a rather odd film for Kubrick to have directed. I mean, I know that he was known for directing all sorts of genres during his career, but for… MoreHmm. Now this is a rather odd film for Kubrick to have directed. I mean, I know that he was known for directing all sorts of genres during his career, but for him to direct this 3 hour epic in the early stages of his career, I must say that I am impressed. Okay, I guess that some back story is needed to understand the way this film was even made. Kirk Douglas was, at the time, out of work and he needed a job to help him get by. So what he had done was finance a film adaption of the novel Spartacus by Howard Fast and have him (being Douglas) portray the title character. Due to creative differences with the original director Anthony Mann, Douglas went back and hired Stanley Kubrick whom he had previously worked with on the acclaimed Paths Of Glory. What resulted would be the first of Kubrick's four epics he would go on to create (the others include 2001: A Space Odyssey, Barry Lyndon, and The Shining) and this has to be, just for the scope of this film alone, one of his most wonderful films ever. With this film, Kubrick created something that appeals to everyone from the people who like romance to the people that love war. This film has it all. Now for my reaction. For the most part, my reaction to this film was in complete shock. After hearing things via word of mouth, I learned quite an interesting bit about this film and the reputation it has on being great. After sitting through this beast of a film, I understand the love people have. But for the most part with ranking this film with Kubrick's other films, I will have to say that this film is in the middle with being on my list of being the greatest. It is not that I have anything against this film. It just that it does not appeal to me on a personal level like how his other films would. But, for an epic period piece, it is by far one of the greatest I have seen. Okay, now for the details. The first is with direction. If you go into this film expecting a typical Kubrick film filled with Kubrick's trademarks that he is associated with, you will be disappointed severely. Things like Kubrick using still cameras to follow people around and the use of classical compositions are not found here. But this is an exception due to this being made early in his career and he was still trying to find his own way of making films. But what really sets this film apart and what makes me love this film is how he films the action sequences that had happened through out. Anyone who knows Kubrick knows that he is beyond difficult with his cast and crew to such a point that they start to loose their minds (ex: Shelly DuVall in The Shining), so one has to wonder how exactly the actors felt during those scenes and how many retakes there must have been. For the overall work and looking at the entire scope of this film, Kubrick done a damn good and impressive job. For acting, well, we have some of the finest performances you will ever see. First I must talk about Kirk Douglas. Now, I have never seen any of his films prior to me writing this review, but due to me seeing a good many of his son's (Michael Douglas) films, I will say that Kirk is a damn fine actor and this film proves it. The main thing that stands out with his acting is just the image and presence he presents on screen. When he is on screen, you are just aware of his control. You know he is in power and that he will steal every shot he is in. It is easy to see where Michael got his acting abilities. The next person will have to be Jean Simmons (yes, I know her name sounds like the Rock God Gene Simmons). Her role in this film is the love interest of Spartacus and my main thought on her is that she is kind of bland. Do not get me wrong: there are moments in which she shines through (professing her love for Spartacus, protecting someone dear to her near the end of the film, etc.), but at times, she just seems to have the same expression on her face. Personally, it would of worked better if she had some more expression. But overall, a rather decent to good performance. Lastly will be the young Tony Curtis. Now, I am mostly a fan of his wife Janet Leigh and his daughter Jamie Lee Curtis' films more, but this being my first introduction to him as an actor, I will admit that I do like his acting. He plays this youthful character that has complete undying loyalty towards Spartacus and Curtis just shows off this entire innocents that works well with the character as a whole. Personally, I love him in this film and I would not mind seeing more of him in other films. Now for the score. Personally, as an original score, I do like how it has a certain Roman flare to it that actually makes it enjoyable. The only thing I would of liked would be if during the fight scenes, the music would have been a tad bit more epic and exciting enough to get your heart racing. But, then again, that would of just added to the stereotypes of Epics, so this is understandable. But, for the music and what it is, I like it. Lastly the script. It is, believe it or not, hard to make a three plus hour film and keep it entertaining and the script does just that. The dialogue seems natural, the scenes are well written, and the film just flows wonderfully. Personally, I would not be surprised if this film won the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screen Play. Well written. Overall, this is a good early Kubrick film and it just shows what was to come in the future for him.

El Hombre Invisible

Least favorite Kubrick, mostly due to Kirk Douglas' hammy acting technique. Despite its' dated elements, it's still an engaging epic with some… MoreLeast favorite Kubrick, mostly due to Kirk Douglas' hammy acting technique. Despite its' dated elements, it's still an engaging epic with some incredible imagery. Watching this film, one can almost hear the old dinosaur of Hollywood dying. Luckily, upon completion of this project, nobody would ever tell Stanley Kubrick what he could or couldn't do, especially Douglas.
<a href="http://s273.photobucket.com/albums/jj203/goji9000/?action=view&current=spartacus.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj203/goji9000/spartacus.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>