We all know Dembski's Explanatory Filter is not just bad, it's stupid. But what would it be like, if we lived in a world in which the EF was correct? Here's a scene from such a world. Contribute your own, if you think of any.

lawyer: So, you allege that the tree fell on your car through a purely naturalistic, regular process, isn't that right?defendant: sure is.lawyer: But the truth is You designed that, didn't you! You wanted the insurance money!defendant: of course I didn't! and you don't have any evidence of it!lawyer: oh, that's true. We didn't find any chainsaw. We didn't find a ladder. You weren't home at the time. All that is true. defendant: see--i didn't do it.lawyer: But...we ran the scenario through the Explanatory Filter!jury: Gasp!lawyer: care to know what the EF had to say about the falling tree branch....defendant: ...gulp...but...but...you don't have any evidence at all about the mechanism I could have used to effect such a plan!lawyer: Ha. This is forensic ID science, Mister. It is not my task to match your pathetic level of detail.Judge: Guilty! Gulty! Gulty!