"Architects, designers, engineers, the people who make our world, have started asking to have biologists sitting at the table," says Janine Benyus at TED in her talk on biomimicry. "Learning about the natural world is one thing, learning from the natural world is another."

Refers to evolutionary design and the virtual modeling of ecosystems, asks How does life make things? How does life make "things" disappear into systems? Much of her talk is similar to the one she gave at Poptech, focusing on biomimetic avenues of innovation:

*Chemistry in Water: moving from inorganic solvents to water-based chemistry, such as the work of the Coates Lab and Cornell, making biodegreabable plastics out of CO2 -- neobiological industry in general

*The Power of Shape: the nautilus' logarithmic spiral is influencing the design of turbine and fan blades, which can be made 50% more efficient; design for disassembly (with, for instance, Van der Wahls forces); color without pigments (peacock feathers) and cleansing without detergents (Lotus leaf paint)

Which brings me back to the idea of ecological footprints. Why measure our negative impacts, solely? Why not aim to leave "ecological handprints?" Why not aim for a civilization which leaves biodiversity and ecosystems better than they were?

"Ecological Handprints"

Yes, yes, yes. Great idea, focus on the positive. Be more good not less bad.