Obama's Birth Certificate on his web-site and FactChech are forgeries.Here is proof.A comparison of an actual LEGAL Birth certificate and scan results.The Berg Lawsuit is factual and this proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.

The State of Hawaii considers a Certification of Live Birth is a secondary source of identification for the purpose of establishing Hawaiian ancestry; a Certificate of Live Birth is considered a primary source. To respond to challenges as to his eligibility for POTUS, BO first posted and then removed from his web site, a Certification of Live Birth, claiming this was his Birth Certificate. But such Certification is only issued when a birth certificate cannot be located in the records.

THERE IT IS, THE CERTIFICATION WAS ISSUED, BECAUSE THE RECORDS COULD NOT BE LOCATED.Because they don't exist.Read the full article here:

************************************I reveived this reply and thought it was worth posting.It is from someone [Nameless] that appears to have a background in these documents:

This might really interest you. As your video mentioned there are two (2) birth documents.

1The medical Birth Certificate filled out at hospital signed by doctor attesting to birth of infant, infant weight etc.2. The legal document the Certificate of Live birth which is filled out at a Govt office. This document is a short form for legal purposes based off the medical record of the Birth Certificate.

So the question is...what was this secretary looking at when she typed out Obamas Certificateof Live Birth form in that Hawaii Govt office 47 years ago?? One clue is in the odd detail of the word "African" typed in to the space for "Race of Father".If that secretary was looking at a AMERICAN style Birth Certificate from the hospital the "Race of Father" information would in 1961 have said "Negro" not "African". After all "African" isnt a race.The State of Hawaii Govt secretary would have simply typed in "Negro" in the race slot. But she didnt. Why? Because she was looking at a Birth Certificate FROM KENYA. The poor Secretary didnt know what to do with that. She had to fill in the "Race of Father" blank but she didnt know if "Negro" was appropriate. After all Negro IS NOT A KENYAN TERM..KENYANS DO NOT USE THE WORD "NEGRO" its an AMERICAN usage. In fact sample Kenyan birth certificates I have looked at have no slot for "Race" at all. They dont think in those terms So the poor secretary simply typed in "African" and was done with it.

OBAMAS REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS FROM KENYAN.OBAMA WAS NOT BORN ON US SOIL.

Matter of fact the law firm that Obama hired is from CAIR. Council on American-Islamic Relations. Why would Obama hire a muslim lawyer IF he was a christian?Of the 1,143,358 resident and active attorneys in the United States, Obama selected Joe Sandler, of the Washington law firm Sandler, Reiff, and Young to represent him in this filing.

Sandler's role for CAIR has been to intimidate people who dare to expose the goals and actions of radical Muslims.

A Revelation TODAY 10/17/2008A revelation just hit me between the eyes.

The Birth Certificate on Obama's web-site.Please bear with me.

It COULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED BY THE STATE OF HAWAII.

If the BC on his website was released by any official State Dept, it would have been notorized with the embossed SEAL, signed, and dated before it was released to ANYBODY. Including Obama himself.If it was printed out by the Dept of Health via computer, it would have to have checked, verified, and Sealed, dated, and signed, before it was released to ANMYBODY. Precaution to ANY official document.

The dept official stated that it should have the seal and date. Janice Okubo.

The same BC would have the folds as the BC would have been mailed, as per their web-site, they have NO wlk in service.

FAIR USE NOTICE. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, . http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

All posts and media uploads are expressed opinions of the contributing members and
are not representative of or endorsed by the owners or employees of Disclose.tv.

This site may contain copyrighted material. Members may make such material available
in an effort to advance the awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights,
economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We
believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law.