I have a little list …

… of questions I’d like reporters to ask John McCain again and again, the way they ask Barack Obama why he won’t say the surge was the most awesomest thing ever:

1. Carly Fiorina, speaking on your behalf, said it was wrong for insurance companies to cover Viagra but not birth control. But you voted twice to let insurance companies keep doing just that. When you were asked about it, you said you didn’t want to talk about the issue and couldn’t remember how you voted on it it, and promised to get back to the reporter with an answer. You never did. Would you require insurance companies that cover Viagra to cover birth control pills?

2. Do you still think that the Social Security system is “an absolute disgrace”?

3. The Bush Administration wants to classify birth control pills as abortion devices. Senator Obama and other members of Congress have protested. You have said nothing. Do you support the change? If the Administration issues new regulations to that effect and you are elected, will you withdraw those regulations?

4. Are lobbyists who have worked for foreign governments allowed to work for your campaign? Will they be allowed to staff your administration?

5. Is it still your position that if we find Osama bin Laden in Pakistan we shouldn’t try to capture him unless the Pakistani government, which is riddled with terrorist supporters, agrees?

6. Why is your campaign violating the McCain-Feingold Act?

7. You have said that you would now vote against your own immigration bill. If the Congress passed the comprehensive immigration reform bill you sponsored just as it was written, would you, as President, sign it or veto it?

8. You claim to be against earmarks. Why did you ask the first Bush Administration for an earmark &#8212 that was the word you used &#8212 for a water project?

9. Is there any expert not employed by your campaign who thinks that a gas tax holiday is a good idea? How would you pay for rebuilding the transportation infrastructure without those tax revenues?

10. Now that the Iraqi government has endorsed Sen. Obama’s withdrawal timetable, and the Bush Administration is negotiating directly with Iran, are you feeling a little left out?

11. You accused Barack Obama of having decided not to visit wounded troops because he couldn’t bring cameras along. Did you have any evidence for that charge? None of the reporters on the trip thinks it was true. On the same trip, he had already visited wounded troops, with no cameras along and no announcement. Do you want to apologize to Sen. Obama?

12. During the primaries, you attacked attack ads. Now your campaign is running virtually nothing else. What changed your mind? And are you really “proud” of an ad your old friend John Weaver called “childish”?

There: that’s a start.

Comments are still busted, so if you have entries to propose email ’em in and I’ll update.

Update Naturally, a reader comes up with a single question that’s worth more by itself than the rest of the list: “Don’t you think you were presumptuous when you claimed to be ‘the American president Americans have been waiting for”? More here.

Second update Another reader pitches in:

Are your anger management problems something voters should worry about? Is someone who shouts obscenities at his wife in front of witnesses safe to be trusted with the power to start a nuclear war?

Third update Oh, yes:

How much did your wife collect from the shopping center deal she was in with Charles Keating at the time when you intervened to keep federal regulators from reining in his S&L before it cost the taxpayers $2.3 billion? Since she has refused to reveal her full tax returns, what assurance do we have that your decisions as President wouldn’t benefit your wife’s business partners?

Fourth update

1. Your campaign spent a ton of money on an ad charging that Sen. Obama refused to visit wounded troops because “the pentagon wouldn’t allow him to bring cameras.” That was false. Sen. Obama in fact visited wounded troops as part of the same trip, without cameras present or even an annoucement to the press.

In addition to your legally required “I approve of this message” at the end of the ad, you later said that you were “proud” of it. Did you ask whether there was any evidence to support that very serious charge before approving the ad? Are you still proud of having made a false charge, and using wounded warriors as political footballs? Have you apologized to Sen. Obama for attacking him unfairly?

2. If you agree that making sure tires are properly inflated is a good idea, why did your campaign poke fun at it? And are you aware that Sen. Obama has a comprehensive policy and that the tire issue was only a minor addendum to it?

3. Do you expect anyone to believe that an office manager for Hess Oil and her railroad-foreman husband made a $61,000 contribution to your campaign and the RNC out of their own funds? Will your campaign return the money and ask the RNC to do the same?