On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:26:19 +1000, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote:
> As I said in the past, even if done by this WG, I have the feeling that
> it would speed up the process to make it a small individual
> specification. As an example, Web API has been quite quick for
> XMLHttpRequest Object.
As editor of that specification, I'm not really convinced. I suppose it
did help Hixie to focus on other issues though. What we need however, is a
volunteer, not a suggestion of where it can be done better.
> # The XMLHttpRequest Object
>
> * first draft at W3C
> W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006
> * Last Call
> W3C Working Draft 27 February 2007
>
> Given the nature of implementations of Canvas, it should be quite quick
> to go through CR, given the number of tests available.
> The issues lists count only one open issue.
> http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/products/3
> http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/products/8
That list is not complete. There are some outstanding LC comments that
have yet to be addressed. There are also some outstanding questions that
implementors have not answered yet.
> I don't know when Anne and Web API WG is planning to call for CR.
Second LC whenever I get around to solve the existing issues.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>