Getting better at all I do is only way to fight ‘imposter syndrome’

Nobody ever taught me how to write. Nobody taught me how to take photos. Nobody taught me how to do graphic design. Or political consulting. Or filmmaking. I’ve never been taught properly how to do any of the things I’ve spent my life doing. Because of this, I have a terrible secret.

I’m insecure about most of what I do. I feel like a fraud — and I’m scared I’ll be exposed one day.

See this simple photo of Molly sitting on my desk over the weekend? I could not have taken that photo a year ago. It looks simple — and that’s much of its charm — but it’s a very difficult photograph, at least by my standards. And unless you know a lot about photography, you wouldn’t be able to shoot it correctly, either.

If people love what I do, I beat myself up and say they just don’t realize how untalented I am. I tell myself they don’t see the work which I attempt and throw away because it’s terrible. They don’t know I’m a fraud — as a writer, photographer, filmmaker, whatever. I’m hiding it from them.

But if they hate what I do — or worse, don’t even care enough to notice it, much less hate it — their indifference hurts in a different way. It’s evidence that they realize I’m an untalented fraud. It’s evidence that they’ve figured me out. It’s proof that I’ll never be good enough.

You see, I can never be good enough for the critic in my head. When I succeed at something, I explain it away as blind luck or artful trickery. So it’s hard to believe I could repeat a success and even build on it to achieve something better.

I recently went through a lot of old email and other records related to what went on right after I made my short film in 2005. When I wrote and shot “We’re the Government — and You’re Not,” I had no idea what I was doing. I was a neophyte just blindly following my instincts. Nobody taught me anything.

I was fortunate enough to find a few key people who helped me make the short a reality, but perhaps none of them mattered as much as the talented Alicia Robbins, who I hired as director of photography. Alicia was from the same Birmingham suburb where I lived and she had gone to high school with someone who was working on the project.

She was already working in Los Angeles in the film industry, but I was able to hire her because she could combine a three-and-a-half-day shoot with a trip home to see her family. She was already a talented professional who knew how to translate my script into the shots that needed to be on the screen. I was very lucky to have her.

After the film was finally shot and edited, I sent a copy to Alicia to review. She was spending part of her time in Los Angeles and part of her time teaching film at Northwestern University in Chicago. In the time after I sent the DVD to her, I received a couple of unsolicited emails from her, both of which I found recently:

— “So, I just had some of my movie industry buds over [in Los Angeles], and they loved the Government flick! They thought it was so original and funny!”

— “I showed my students and fellow faculty members at Northwestern the film, and they all loved it! They thought it was so clever! So, I think you definitely have a good chance of making it into a couple of big festivals at least!”

I’m not telling you this to brag. I’m telling you because I was getting very positive feedback on my short from people who knew what they were talking about — and I found a way to ignore them.

You see, I had completely forgotten about Alicia’s messages telling me that her LA film industry buddies liked my short and that film students and film faculty at Northwestern praised it.

Why would I do that?

This short went to 20 or 25 film festivals and won something like five awards, mostly awards for something such as “audience favorite comedy,” but it was best in show at one festival. On YouTube, the couple of different versions have been seen something like 350,000 times. I even sold 500 copies of the DVD, including somebody in South Korea who bought five copies.

But through it all, I felt like a fraud. I obviously didn’t know what I was doing. If people liked it, I must have gotten lucky. And if I’d just gotten lucky, everyone would realize that I was an imposter as a filmmaker if I made another one.

I might get lucky with one film, but the second would surely show me to be a fraud. And that fear of being an imposter as a filmmaker led me to spend the next 14 years making excuses for why I couldn’t make another film — and why I haven’t spent the time making better films.

That talented director of photography that I told you about wasn’t like me. She had faith in herself and in her work. At this point, she’s just started as a director of photography on the ABC television show “Grey’s Anatomy.” If you look her up on the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), you’ll find her recent credits — and if you’ll scroll down to 2005 in her list of credits, you’ll find my film listed, too.

Something in me refused to believe the 20 or 25 film festivals which accepted my film — from programmers in the U.S., Canada, England, Australia and New Zealand. Apparently, I had them all fooled.

I refused to listen to the people who gave my film awards, including the rather nice one that came with a $2,000 prize.

I refused to believe the praise that came from the people who wrote and asked to buy copies of the DVD.

I refused to pay attention when the only person I knew with film industry connections gave me very strong feedback from her peers that I should move forward.

I did all this because my imposter syndrome was too powerful. I had to find reasons to explain away this success. I had to ignore the fact that the other first-time filmmakers I knew often felt lucky to make it into one festival. I had to ignore all the evidence — and believe my fears instead.

I’ve been working hard on my photography lately. I have no special reason to do this. I guess I’m trying to prove to myself that I actually have some talent and that I can actually do good work.

I don’t take so many photos of my animals and sunsets and nature around me simply because I enjoy the results. I take them because I’m working to get better. Lately, I’ve been working on shallow depth of field and I’ve been working on challenging lighting conditions, such as the conditions of the photo of Molly.

And you know what? I’m getting better.

I’ve been pushing myself lately in ways that make me uncomfortable. I want to force myself to get better at the things I do. Part of it is because I want to do better work, but part of it is simply because I need to beat my fears.

I need to get so good at everything I do that I can no longer believe I’m an imposter.

I have to believe I’m a great writer. I have to believe I’m a great photographer. I have to believe I’m a great filmmaker. I have to believe these things before I can allow myself to take the steps I need to take.

Getting better at the things I do — and making it difficult for me to believe my inner critic’s lies — are the only ways I know to beat imposter syndrome.

As I looked recently at the feedback I had from my short years ago, I wondered what would have happened if I could have allowed myself to make another film. And then another. And then another.

I can’t say for certain, but I strongly suspect I’d be making my living by making films. I doubt I would be a Hollywood blockbuster director, but I believe I would be making art that matters — and I believe I would be living comfortably doing it.

Here’s why I believe that. I’m going to say this quietly and I hope you won’t repeat it.

I suspect I am far more talented than I have allowed myself to admit. I have a sick fear that I can do great work if I’ll just allow myself to quit being afraid — to quit making excuses.

I have no idea why I feel this way, but I feel as though I’m about the enter the most intensely creative period my life has ever seen.

All I have to do is to let myself do the work that comes so naturally to me — and to stop believing I’m an imposter. I might just do some pretty good work.

Primary Sidebar

My Instagram

Critter Instagram

Contact David

David likes email, but can’t reply to every message. I get a surprisingly large number of requests for relationship advice — seriously — but time doesn’t permit a response to all of them. (Sorry.)

Subscribe

Enter your address to receive notifications by email every time new articles are posted. Then click “Subscribe.”

Email Address

Donations

If you enjoy this site and want to help, click here. All donations are appreciated, no matter how large or small. (PayPal often doesn’t identify donors, so I might not be able to thank you directly.)

Search

Search this website

Archives

Archives

Secondary Sidebar

Briefly

What if your daughter were about to start kindergarten and you went to the affluent school where she was about to go and discovered that the school was teaching nonsense? That’s exactly what happened to an education consultant in Colorado who recently visited his daughter’s new school. Everybody was nice, but when the kindergarten teacher talked about their methods of teaching reading, he cringed. She was using “progressive” methods that were debunked decades ago. He’s learning that most schools use similar techniques that don’t work, simply because schools of education are committed to ideas and techniques based on ideology instead of cognitive science. So why do so many people entrust their children’s future to these well-meaning but incompetent people? It’s one of the most underreported scandals of modern learning. Read his summary of what he’s found here and then check out the radio documentary to which he refers where you can find out more.

I really enjoy political satire. You might remember that my first short film was political satire. But there’s a trend in political satire today which I find disturbing — and this graphic is a great example. This fake promotional ad for Fox News was placed on New York City subways recently. When I found it on social media, people who lean to the political left were smirking and enjoying this attack on their “stupid” opponents. But this isn’t satire. It’s just a mean-spirited attempt to say, “Those who agree with me are smarter than you idiots who watch Fox News.” It’s a smirking, nasty attack which makes no point other than to claim superiority over people for the sin of disagreeing. I absolutely loathe Fox News, but I also loathe CNN and MSNBC and all the other media outfits who pander to partisans and intentionally try to divide people. If you want to show that you’re a small-minded bigot who doesn’t understand his opponents, just pretend your enemies are all stupid and evil. They’re not. The truth is a lot more complicated. Ideas are ripe for satire, but that involves creative thinking, not just nasty personal attacks.

When I have a bad day, my first reaction is to want to turn to someone I love. But my next instinct is a paradox. If I can’t call someone and I can’t touch someone and I can’t be with someone who loves me, I have an overwhelming desire to be alone. Tuesday was an unpleasant day. I had to argue with my bank about something. (I won, but still.) Something happened at work that made me want to walk out and never return, although I understand that nobody else involved would understand. Tonight, someone on Facebook who I barely knew reacted badly to something I said — for reasons I’m completely baffled about — and called me a “jackass” and unfriended me. I’d like to talk with someone I love. I’d like to spend time with a loved one and feel safe and understood. But since I can’t do that, I crave the opposite. I want to find a cabin somewhere and disappear for a month. We humans are social creatures. We need each other. But there are days when others cause enough hurt that a few weeks of silence would be a relief. This has been one of those days.

Democracy is going to die — and it’s all because the human brain prefers easy answers to complex problems. You and I were born during the golden age of democracy. It was a period during which it was assumed that democracy was the natural evolution of civic governance. But Dr. Shawn W. Rosenberg is challenging that idea. He’s a leader in the study of political psychology and he says research convinces him that the human brain isn’t wired for self-rule and that democracy is heading toward collapse. In a paper presented this year to the International Society of Political Psychologists, Rosenberg argues that the human brain naturally favors simple answers to complex problems, which tends to favor the rise of authoritarian strongmen who offer confident and simplistic solutions. Anyone who’s paying attention sees this happening around the world already. Donald Trump isn’t the cause of the problem, but he is an early example of this outcome in action. All authoritarian rulers come to power offering simplistic solutions — just as Adolph Hitler did in Germany and Benito Mussolini did in Italy. I’ve argued for 20 years that this country is heading toward social and economic collapse and I’ve made the case that things are going to get ugly when that happens, at least for those who are not prepared. Many people will ignore this evidence, of course, because they have too much emotionally invested in the idea that democracy will prevail — but that is just another example of clinging to a simple answer to a very complex problem. Don’t be surprised when things get ugly.

Political candidates are liars. They can’t help it, because lying to voters is the only thing that gets them elected. They have to promise things which are not possible. I used to write political promises for my clients, so I know this very well. None of my successful clients ever did anything which I promised for them. Every day lately, I see new promises from presidential candidates. I know they’re lying about what they will do if elected — and I assume they know they’re lying, too. When a society changes, the change starts from culture — and that starts with the values which individuals hold. I hate many things about this society. I want a lot of changes. When I was young, I believed the way to change those things was by becoming a political leader. I know better today. We live like hamsters on a wheel or rats in a maze. Government can’t change that. Only we can make those changes for ourselves. The next time you hear a politician promising to change your life — your work life or your home life or your children’s future — remember that the person is lying. Don’t wait for politicians. Take the initiative and change your own life. Nobody else can do it for you.

Crass Capitalism

Before you buy anything from Amazon, please click on this ad. I’ll get a tiny commission, but it won’t cost you a nickel extra. The cats and I thank you. (If you’re using an ad-blocker and can’t see the ad, you can click here instead.)