Uughh........I hope this turns out to be untrue but it seems Khan is going to be the Star Trek 2 (or 12) main villain.

Imho - if true - that would be the worst case scenerio, I really was hoping for something NEW this time. I am so tired of Star Trek films trying to copy themselve, ever since First Contact they only go for "like Wrath of Khan" and it NEVER works.

Honestly, JJ. Abrahms did a good job on the reboot, but I do feel they better had someone else write and develop the sequel. Obviously he is way to busy with other stuff and it seems they cobbled together a script at the last minute.

It seems that Abrams may have been referring to Del Toro's involvement as untrue, not the inclusion of Khan—because Vulture backs up the original Latino Review report that, yes, Khan is the villain of "Star Trek 2." Developing, as they say.

Atekimogus wrote:Imho - if true - that would be the worst case scenerio, I really was hoping for something NEW this time. I am so tired of Star Trek films trying to copy themselve, ever since First Contact they only go for "like Wrath of Khan" and it NEVER works.

I wouldn't go that far. FC worked for the same reason Khan worked - it developed naturally from themes established in the series. The reason the other wannabe-TWoKs (Nemesis in particular) failed was because they tried to create the same sort of animosity from scratch.

Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.

Still, I'd rather see something new and creative instead of a remake. If they use Khan again they have, as I see it, two choices.

First they make a remake or reimagining of the Khan storyline, quite similar to all the other recent and coming remakes. (Like the coming Spiderman remakes for example...oh oh....he gets bitten by a radioctive spider and his uncle still dies BUT NOW it is so much more dark knight spiderman than before.....can't wait ).Or second, they use the Khan character but create a completely different and creative story around him, which then begs the question why use the Khan character in the first place........

Honestly, I'd rather have they don't use any of the established TOS characters (Khan, Mudd etc.) other than as for short cameos and come up with something new for a change.

My biggest issue with a re-use of Khan isn't so much that it might be practically impossible to recreate the writing for the character - it's that it will be practically impossible to replicate Montalban's performance.

Mikey wrote:My biggest issue with a re-use of Khan isn't so much that it might be practically impossible to recreate the writing for the character - it's that it will be practically impossible to replicate Montalban's performance.

... I don't know. We thought none of the actors from the reboot would work, and to paraphrase tv tropes it seemed DeForest had come back to life to possess the new guy.

When I heard they were (essentially) remaking TOS, I thought it didn't have a hope in hell. Another actor play Kirk, Bones, Spock? No way in hell could anybody pull that off. In the end I just took a wait and see attitude, curious to see what they came up with.

And my but did they pull it off. Most of the complaints you hear about XI are related to plot holes or the bad guy - even the films critics generally say the actors pulled off their roles superbly.

Maybe this will be good, maybe it won't, but right now I have no reason to think they won't do something good. I'm certainly not going to spend the next year bitching about how they can't possibly make a good movie just because one of the characters is called Khan.

Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...

That said, I do understand GK's and Striker's point... I just feel that Montalban injected such a unique and personal touch into the role; of course everyone did, but Khan had become so iconic beyond the actual place of the character in the milieu.

I don't doubt that Khan can be replaced by another actor giving a great performance. I mean it's not like the original one got an oscar or anything.

It's just that with the recent influx of remakes it seems they just don't have it in them anymore to come up with a marginally original concept and the reuse of a well known villain seems to be a sign that they are not trying very hard and take the easy road.

Ok, the movie can still be great and entertaining in the same way the 100th Robin Hood movie still can be entertaining. I'd rather have something new though.

Oscars don't mean shit. Not that he ever cold have gotten an Oscar anyways. It's only in the last few years that anyone will consider a scifi movie for anything but an award in special effects.

Ok, the movie can still be great and entertaining in the same way the 100th Robin Hood movie still can be entertaining. I'd rather have something new though.

This, I'd rather have Hollywood prove they still have an original idea in the tank somewhere than redo a movie that's already been done before, and done as perfectly as I can imagine it to have been done to boot.

Khan could well prove to be a great villain in the new movie, but he'll never have the relationship with Kirk that the original did, which IMO is what made the orginal Khan so great. That being the case, why bother naming him Khan?

Unless they're planning a loose remake of Space Seed, with the Enterprise finding Khan in Cryogenic freeze. That might make an interesting tale.

"You ain't gonna get off down the trail a mile or two, and go missing your wife or something, like our last cook done, are you?""My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."