111
Want to hear a funny joke? I didn't read your post. Even though I took the time and energy to respond to your post, I didn't read it. See how silly that sounds? You are so bent on "teaching me a lesson", that you just slapped yourself in the face. Your post is equivalent to those people who when fired say, "I'm not fired because I quit". Word of advice: If you didn't read my post you most certainly wouldn't have taken the time and energy to write me a post telling me that you didn't read it. In fact if you were as indifferent as you are pretending to be, you wouldn't have even responded at all. You know you struck a nerve, when a SM fan writes a post just to tell you that they didn't "bother to read" your "boring" post. If my post are so "boring", then why are you using the "I must have struck a nerve..." card? My post must not be too boring or repeative because you are using them for inspiration.
Why do SM fans always proclaim a victory where none exists? Writing a long post in repsonse to your "everybody is picking on SM for no apparant reason"/"you are a evil person for commenting about SM bad behavior and having empathy for the REAL VICTIMS" mentality doesn't equate to you struck a nerve; all you proved is that SM and her fans are her worst enemies. Rather than acknowledge that SM is wrong, you did what you do best- make excuse after excuse for her bad behavior and criticize others for not employing the "out of sight, out of mind" mentality in regards to Rg and her 4 kids or "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" mentality in regards to SM abd behavior. BTW, you have no room to criticize anyone for "being repeatitive", when your one and only means of defending SM is to make personal attacks agaisnt those posters who won't fall in line. Speaking of "writing a book", didn't you write some long posts? What was I thinking, the rules you impose on others don't apply to you.
Boring is a 27 yo ADULT always whining about how someone is being "unfair" to her as she shamelessly flaunts her affair with a married man and rubs it is his wife's face; always blaming others for her self-inflicted wounds and never taking responsibility for her actions;always depicting RG and her 4 kids as the villians;always perpetuating the notion that she is either suffering more than the married man's wife and kids or that the they are not suffering at all; and pushing the notion that sleeping with a married man is "cool"/romantic" or that "love" justifies her actions with a married man.

Wow, looks like I struck a nerve. I didn't expect you to write a book, which I didn't bother to read cause it was boring and I've read what you write over and over again. Oh well.

5 years

105
Yes, "poor, little helpless, angelic" SM. Why can't people understand that SM happiness trumps the well being of a mother and her 4 kids. It's all RG fault because she wouldn't make things easy for SM and BG and file the divorce; it's all BG's kid's fault because they need to understand that SM needs BG more than they do; and it's the fault of all those people who respond to SM bad behavior because they won't employ the "see no evil, hear no evil" mentality in regards to SM very public affair. (sarcasm)
All I hear are excuses. You justify SM actions by manipulating reality, ignoring her bad behavior and refusing to acknoweldge the real victims. In other words, Sm hasn't done anything wrong because you employ the "see no evil, hear no evil,and speak no evil" mentality. Just because you don't care about the REAL VICTIMS (which is weird considering how much you whine about how others "unmercilessly bash" SM), doesn't mean that the rest of the world has employed this same mentality. In the world outside of your fantasy people are not impressed by SM total disregard of a mother and her 4 kids, especially when she wrote on a blog about how she cares about the plight of women and children. It appears that you are just upset because people have more sympathy for RG and her 4 kids than SM. You think that the less people hear about or see of RG and her 4 kids, the better it is for SM.
SM didn't accidently fall, trip, and land in the married man's bed or on vacation with him. She slept with hin knowing full well that he was married and she made the affair public knowing full well that it would hurt his wife. so she is EQUALLY responsible for this affair. She was in RG position once ( and she never let the public forget about either), yet here she is doing what was done to her and expecting people to turn a blind eye just as she prances about with another sister's husband. When exactly is SM going to start acting like a an ADULT and take responsibility for her actions? When is SM going stop waging this war against a mother and her 4 kids? RG and her 4 kids have not done anything to SM, yet she never misses an opportunity to rub the affair in their faces.
Instead of blaming people for SM actions, perhaps you should defend someone who doesn't play victim as she has a very public affair with a married man or releases reports about how she wants to move in, marry, and have babies with a man who doesn't have any qualms about hurting the woman who helped him through his drug addiction, who would rather go on binges with the love of his life (I don't mean SM, but ALCOHOL), who doesn't even care about how these photos with his mistress will impact his kids, or who doesn't even care/love SM enough to file for a divorce( so much so that she has to make up for his unwillingless to commit to her by releasing stories about how they are going to live together).

5 years

105
5)"Because it's not my life. It's fun to comment on people's outfits or hair and sometimes to comment on something they make public. But to completely wrap yourself up in their situation is another story altogether. "
It's not your life, and yet you take the time and energy to write a post like this. Once again, please remove your rose colored glasses. If you were not "completely wrapped up" in this, you wouldn't always be here depicting those who won't condone SM actions as the villians and you most certainly wouldn't be here taking the time and energy to write a post about how "I am a bad person for commenting on SM bad behavior". This is what baffles me about SM fans, why do they think that they don't have to abide by the standards that they impose others? No matter how much you protest, this definately is a personal issue for you; and you proved this by going through the trouble to post "nice things" about SM or defend her from being "unmercilessly bashed". If you want to have fun, then why do you invest so much time and energy into trying to "shame" those posters who won't condone SM antics with a married man? SM is not the victim.

5 years

105
105
3)It's like you say the same things over and over".
Please remove your rose colored glasses because you say the same thing over and over. How many times have you come to this board just to talk about other posters and whine about how people are picking on SM for no apparant reason? How many times have you depicted SM as the victim. But of course, you don't have to abide by the standards that you impose on others.
4)"Now I know I know, now you're going to say that this is what Sienna is doing to Rosetta and the children but it's like I just said. I don't really care what Sienna did to Rosetta and the children, or what she's doing with balthazar whatever his name is. "
Go figure. You don't care that SM is harming a mother and her 4 kids, but you want to sit here and criticize me for "unmercilessly bashing" SM. See the hypocrisy, you can't expect people to feel sorry for SM when you yourself don't even care about the real victims. It comes down to the fact that you are upset because people have sided with RG and her 4 kids. SM is "unmercilessly bashing" a mother and her 4 kids and all you can think about his how someone is being "unfair" to SM?

5 years

105
2)" I don't think anyone on here that fights with you really cares about the situation but I don't know if I speak for myself but I'm more interested in defending someone when they are being unmercifully bashed by someone else."
Sienna is not being "unmercifully bashed", especially when she is taunting the married man's wife by wearing the breat sucking dress on his kids' birthday and then the Mickey Mouse shirt and leaking photos of herself sticking her tongue in the married man's ear. Let's not forget, SM "unmercifully based" JL nanny, so why shouldn't she be held by the standard that she imposed on this woman? The problem is SM, if she had been selective in what she put out in the media, then she wouldn't be in this situation.
Whether you like it or not, people are not going to fawn over SM "Me, me, me, Look at me" stunts. They see these stunts for what they are, SM is insecure and only feels good about herself when she is competing against other women, especially women with children and who are either pregnant or have given birth. Why does this 27 yp ADULT woman feel important when she is hurting someone else?
No one views SM as VICTIM. It is sad that she doesn't have the decency to own up to her bad behavior or stop reaping havoc in the livs of others. SM is wrong and no amount of passing the buck or depicting those who comment on her bad behavior is going to change this. No amount of playing the victim is going to make people see SM as the victim.
You start fights because you think that you can force or bully others into thinking like you. When the fights work against you, just like SM, you scream that people are "picking on you for no apprant reason.

5 years

105
1) Well I could ask you the same thing. Why are you so caught up on this,let me also remind you that this isn't your situation either. But to answer your question, it's called EMPATHY. I see a woman and her children being humilated every week and that is not right. I see the woman who is doing the hurting not taking responsibility for her actions and then having the nerve to whine about how someone is making her life miserable and always playing the victim, and that is not right. I see media blogs glorifying the affair and perpetuating that SM is the victim even though she is sleeping with a married man and has been purposesly rubbing the affair in the married man's wife face, and that is not right. I see media blogs pushing the issue that RG and ehr 4 kids are not suffering or that sM is suffering more than RG and her 4 kids, and that is not right. Last but not least, I see people like you trying to justify SM behavior by blaming others, and that is not right.

One question, Robin. Why are you so hung up on this? I mean, it didn't happen to you. It isn't your situation. Why are you so consumed with hatred and rage? It's like you say the same things over and over. I think I've read the word 'victim' a hundred times already coming from you. I don't think anyone on here that fights with you really cares about the situation but I don't know if I speak for myself but I'm more interested in defending someone when they are being unmercifully bashed by someone else. Now I know I know, now you're going to say that this is what Sienna is doing to Rosetta and the children but it's like I just said. I don't really care what Sienna did to Rosetta and the children, or what she's doing with balthazar whatever his name is. I don't care where she went to eat this morning and I don't care what she said in an interview. Because it's not my life. It's fun to comment on people's outfits or hair and sometimes to comment on something they make public. But to completely wrap yourself up in their situation is another story altogether.

5 years

STUPID is:
competeting with a mother and her 4 kids for a man.
whining about how "people are pikcing on you for no apparant reason", while you have a very public affair with a married man and taunt the married man's wife and kids.
trying to trick the world into believing that Love=public appearances on family holidays and publicly engaging in pda with a married man who won't even file for a divorce.
always playing the victim while she is waging a war against a mother and her 4 kids.
passing buck and not taking responsibility for one's own actions.

5 years

104
The answer is:
1)You are upset because people have more sympathy for RG and her 4 kids. Rather than put the blame where it is rightfully due(ie-SM and BG), you try to spin it to make it look like RG is 100% to blame for the affair because she won't "do the right thing" by SM (and her "great romance" with a married man) and file for the divorce. RG doesn't owe SM or BG a thing because SM and BG are HAVING THE PUBLIC AFFAIR and SM is the one playing the victim, spreading lies about RG, and using the media to rub the affair in her face. If SM and the married man want to be together so badly that they keep pulling these "spending qulaity time" together photos, then BG should file the divorce. While SM and BG are out making a mess of things, RG is trying to take care of 4 KIDS.
2) Where is it written that the woman, and not her husband, is obligated to file for the divorce? Where is it written that if a woman doesn't file for the divorce, then it means that she is in it for the money and status? Isn't that a double standard? By your same logic, there is nothing preventing BG from filing for the divorce, so why do you keep acting like it is her duty to file for the divorce?
3) No matter how you try to pass the buck to RG, it won't change the fact that SM is WRONG for having a very public affair with a married man who has not shown any indications that he plans on filing for the divorce. The truth hurts, which is why you are desperately trying to make it look like the only obstacle for SM and BG "great romance" is his wife.

99
Answer the question? The one where you blame yet another person for SIENNA MILLER's actions? People are not "ranting" or being mean to Sienna Miller, they are holding her to the same standard that she imposed on JL nanny; the one where she publicly berated this woman for inserting herself into her relationship with JL. So why should SM be held by a different standard now that she is the other woman? Because she is "pretty", a "great actress", or has a great sense of style?
Ranting is always blaming people for SIENNA MILLER's actions and then trying to depict her as the VICTIM, while completely ignoring the REAL VICTIMS and trying to depict the married man's wife and his kids as the villain.
For once stop "ranting", or shall I say passing the buck; and acknowledge that SM is WRONG and show some consideratoin for the real victim.
BTW, RG is busy taking care of her 4 KIDS and cleaning up BG and SM mess; meanwhile SM and BG are always on some alcoholic binge. If they have enough time to vacation and engage in pda in public, then BG has enough time to file for the divorce.
Speaking of ranting? How much has Sienna done of that this year alone? Everytime she doesn't get her way, she whines about how someone is being "unfair" (despite the fact that she is waging a war against a mother and her 4 kids). If anyone wants status and money, it's Sienna Miller. He is married and doesn't show any signs of getting a divorce, and for some reason this makes SM admirable? Stop passing the buck, Sm did this to herself.

#89
Yeah they can all live their life the way they want to, except Slutty and Balthazar get to run all over the world on a drunken vacation, and she has to take care of the kids. Sopport them, too, since he has no job and no money. Doesn't exactly seem fair, now does it?

97
I did read your question and it just another opportunity to pass the buck. SM "sources" said that BG wife is after his money and status and that makes it true, despite the fact that this woman is Catholic, has been married to that man for EIGHT years, and has 4 kids that need food, clothing, etc...?
So by your logic, the affair is RG fault because she won't file for the divorce. Nevermind the fact that SM and BG have shown on numerous occasions that there is nothing preventing BG from filing for the divorce? I guess it's more easier to blame someone else(ie-RG), then to face the truth(ie-BG doesn't love SM and doesn't even find her worthy of commitments. He only finds SM important as long as the alcohol is flowing).
The better question is why would SM continue to sleep with a man who has no qualms about hurting his wife and 4 kids, even going so far as to taunt the married man's family and use the media to depict his wife as the villian? It's not for love because if that was the case, she wouldn't be encouraging his alcoholic binges.

94
If you were BG's mistress and he still hadn't filed for a divorce after a YEAR, would you still be engaging in pda or sleeping with him?
Since when is it the woman's responsibility to file for the divorce? Since BG and SM have enough time to vacation and publicy engage in pda, then he should file for the divorce. Blaming the wife for not filing for a divorce doesn't help SM because by that same logic, there is NOTING stopping BG from filing for the divorce. If he really wanted a longterm or serious relationship with SM, then he would MOVE ON, file for the divorce, and make the proper provisions so that his children receive the funds from his job and inheritance.
I highly doubt that RG won't file for a divorce because of status or money. Isn't she catholic? BG has status? He is a relapsed alcoholic who lost his job and was unable to support his own family for years. Besides, RG doesn't need BG status because she has her own fashion line. Going after men because of status and money is SM MO. If BG wasn't an "oil heir" SM wouldn't even be associating with him.

If you'd been married to Getty and he was cheating in public would you still be married??? Don't think that there's anything else than the money and status why she hasn't divorced him yet.

5 years

So now the name of the game is "trash the married man's wife" so that SM comes off looking like the better person? Trashing the married man's wife does little to help SM, especially since she is the one sleeping with another sister's husband and whining about how her life is hell. Speaking of fake relationships. There is nothing more fake then sleeping with and engaging in pda with married man who still hasn't filed for a divorce. If BG was happy with SM, then why has he relapsed?

5 years

How can RG and her 4 kids go on with their lives when Sienna is always rubbing the affair in their faces and making them relive their pain?
Not to mention, SM makes matters worse when she tries to perpetuate the notion that she is suffering more than BG's wife and kids and then trys to justify her actions with RG's husband by depicting RG as a villian.
A separation is not a divorce; so no the married man hasn't moved on. Since the married man is still married, this means that he is having an affair with SM and has not moved on. Married is married, and that will only change when the married man files for a divorce. If he has enough tome to vacation with his mistress, then surely he has enough time to file for the divorce.

Life is never just black and white, life is all the colors in between and since they're handling their life as they want you could just accept that his separated wife also lives her life like she want.

5 years

84
Sienna, not the people commenting on her bad behavior, is responsible for what is happening to her. It was a stupid idea to tip off the paps so that she could be captured spending Father's Day with the married man and it was stupid to put on that Mickey Mouse shirt to taunt the married man's family. No matter how you spin it, she is not the victim. The more you depict her as a victim and blame the public for HER actions, the less sympathy the public has her for. The more you criticize people for not showing SM any sympathy SM, while ignoring the REAL VICTIMS and how she hasn't shown an ounce of sympathy to the real victims, the less sympathy the public has for her. No one sees her as the victim because she is reaping havoc in the lives of others and won't take responsibility for her actions.