Charlie Sheen has hit back against the predictable
establishment response to his Jimmy Kimmel Live appearance by asking
why they failed to address the two core issues he mentioned, the five
frames of the Pentagon footage and Building 7. Sheen accuses the media
of being complicit in the 9/11 cover-up.

The response to Charlie Sheen's Friday night appearance
on Jimmy Kimmel Live (VIDEO)
again underscores the blind ignorance of the establishment media in
their treatment of the 9/11 subject as well as their blatant deception
in claiming Sheen has little public support.

Sheen limited his focus to just two issues, the
Pentagon and Building 7.

"There are two areas," said Sheen, "Building
7 and the five frames from the Pentagon. Don't listen to me, do your
own research," Sheen stated on the ABC show.

But every single hit piece has failed to adequately
discuss either.

According to recent developments in the Moussaoui
trial, family members were shown video of the impact of Flight 77. Why
is that footage so sensitive that it has not been released publicly?
Or was the footage just a repeat of the five amorphous frames that have
provoked so many questions?

The National
Ledger website has so relentlessly attacked Sheen that
it looks like they are now doing so only to try and attract attention.
Despite this, today's tirade fell flat on its face again in refusing
to address the main tenets of Sheen's argument. The writer also confused
Charlie Sheen with Tom Cruise, as can be seen from the screenshot below,
hardly a mistake that would fill one with confidence as to their focus
and journalistic credibility.

While attempting to state that Sheen is trying
to come forward with a mea culpa The Ledger can't even keep straight
that its Sheen not Tom Cruise who is brave enough to ask questions about
9/11.

Furthermore, The Ledger cites the cockpit recordings
of Flight 93 as evidence to debunk Sheen's claims. For a start Sheen
has not even discussed Flight 93 or used it to illustrate his argument.
Secondly, the Flight 93 cockpit recordings, assuming they are genuine,
contradict the official contention that the 'let's roll' heroes bravely
crashed the plane, preventing it from finding a higher profile target.

This completely contradicts a speech made by President
Bush on May 8 2002.

"I think the most telling event on September
11th, and one that I hope a lot of people remember, is what happened
on Flight 93. Basically, what I’m saying is, it’s important
to serve something greater than yourself in life. It’s important
to serve a call greater than yourself and a cause greater than yourself.
Flight 93, we had average citizens flying across the country, and they
realized their plane was fixing to be used as a weapon on the Nation’s
Capital. They called their loved ones on the phone. They said a prayer
and told them they loved them, said a prayer, and they drove the plane
in the ground to serve something greater than themselves. That’s
the American spirit I know. That’s that sense of sacrifice that
makes this country so strong."

If you believe the Flight 93 transcripts the only
people who drove the plane into the ground were the hijackers.

The Ledger tries to slam Sheen, stating:

"No one cares if Charlie Sheen has questions."

"But when you make outrageous claims with
nothing more than propaganda to back up said claims - expect to be attacked.
Other people get to speak as well - and Sheen needs to understand that."

"Sheen is allowed to have his questions -
and folks in the media are allowed to challenge him and indeed label
him a tin foil hat wearing "Hollywood nut."

He brought nothing serious to the table to debate.

Quite to the contrary, Sheen asserted only (as
he has ever done) that he has questions about things that "don't
make sense," and wants to see more attention given to these questions
that many people share. His statements during the Jimmy Kimmel interview
were not a mea culpa, but a hardline stance reclaiming his right as
an American citizen to question authority.

Despite what many might have you believe about
Sheen, the people are with him.

"Hey Jim - Why did you so carefully yet obviously
OMIT my two specific focal points, Building 7 and the 5 frames from
the Pentagon, in your story, despite numerous quotes from the Kimmel
piece interwoven throughout?"

"Like so many others, chances are you took
a look for yourself and realized the evidence is far too credible. I'm
all for an honest debate. However, manipulating or distorting such irrefutable
data prevents anything of the sort from occurring. There is nothing
"tiny" about this movement. Do a little more research before
you spew forth such blatant inaccuracies."

"It's actually inspiring to witness this level
of media arrogance and complicity - it so clearly illustrates a radical
and baseline climate of fear. Fear perhaps, of the TRUTH... I wish you
well in your travels."

We will wait and see if The Ledger even publishes
Sheen's rebuttal, something the Guardian
refused to do.

The most egregious of the spin appears on Slashfilm
where the site states that, "The public attacked Sheen after asking
questions about 9/11 on a national radio show. The general viewpoint
being that he was just an actor, what right does he have to make such
accusations."

While Sheen does indicate that he was attacked
for his comments during the interview, it was in fact the media
that attacked his brave stance and not the public. The
public's outcry, as measured by several polls conducted
by CNN and others,
had been very much in favor of Sheen and his willingness to put his
career on the line and speak truth to power. Even during the interview
on the Jimmy Kimmel Live program, the crowd responded with a powerful
and sustained round of applause when Sheen again raised his questions
about 9/11.

In an article recently published by Scripps-Howard
News Service, Journalist Betsy Hart notes the incredible
response she first received when covering the Sheen 9/11 story, "I
started getting inundated with e-mails. They implored or demanded that
I consider Sheen's "evidence" of a government conspiracy."

This is a cheap attempt to skew the incredible,
positive response from people all over the country who viewed Sheen's
statements on 9/11 as a courageous and important act.

Far from becoming a shrinking violet, Charlie Sheen
has now gone one step further in his defiant stance on 9/11. After the
media failed to respond to his invitation to challenge him on the facts,
he is now pointing a finger at the media for collaborating in the cover-up
of 9/11.

"The mainstream media's blatant attempt to
suffocate and censor my specific points of interest i.e. Building 7
and the five frames from the Pentagon, illustrates their transparent
and desperate role as accomplices to the 9/11 cover up," Sheen
told us.

Proof of this censorship has again come from Google's
quarters, following their refusal to index any articles concerning Sheen's
appearance on The Alex Jones Show, a policy that was later
reversed, we have again run into a black hole in terms
of Google's failure to index Infowars or Prison Planet articles concerning
Sheen's appearance on Kimmel (listing
only a temporary cache of our main index pages).

Will Google continue to impose a blackout or, as
in other
cases, will they relent under pressure?

Will the mainstream attack dogs continue to whimper
like poodles or will they actually engage Sheen in a real debate?

---------------------------------------------------

Please help
our fight against the New World Order by giving a donation. As bandwidth
costs increase, the only way we can stay online and expand is with your
support. Please consider giving a monthly or one-off donation for whatever
you can afford. You can pay securely by either credit card or Paypal.Click here
to donate.