FAQ and ancient entries

In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and earlier)
information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be able to
archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use. Thoughts
on how best to achieve this?

Some examples:

SLAPD (with LDBM database) prerequisites include suitable database support.
One of following packages can fulfill the prerequisite.

(Answer) How do I select a suitable LDBM backend?
(Answer) How do I force LDBM to use of BerkeleyDB?
(Answer) How do I force LDBM to use of GDBM?
(Answer) Can LDBM use NDBM?
etc.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration