To navigate something as complex and dynamic as the brain, a map would help.

Researchers have learned an enormous amount about how we think, what drives our behaviors, and why we feel the way we do since President George H.W. Bush proclaimed the 1990s the “decade of the brain,” but many fundamental questions about the three-pound universe remain unanswered. So President Obama has proposed a Brain Activity Map (BAM) project to reveal some of these remaining secrets, using the Human Genome Project as a model. Not all scientists, however, are on board.

In his state of the union speech, the President noted that every dollar invested in the human genome project “returned $140 to our economy.” With some $3.8 billion spent over 13 years, the resulting gene-based boon turned out to be $796 billion in new jobs, medical treatments, increased salaries and other benefits, according to a 2011 analysis conducted for the federal government. Although medical care has not advanced as much as initially expected because — surprise — the science of genetics is more complex than scientists had anticipated, the data is continuing to yield fruit and promises to provide more value in years to come.

The BAM project hopes to offer returns of equal or greater value, although the amount of funding has not yet been determined. The New York Timesreports that scientists hope for at least as much money as was devoted to the genome project— $300 million a year for at least ten years— but what the administration will seek as part of the proposed budget and where the money will come from is not yet clear.

The goal is to produce the first map of brain function to explore every signal sent by every cell and track how the resulting data flows through neural networks and is ultimately translated into thoughts, feelings and actions. While work is already underway to understand the wiring diagram of the whole brain— known as the connectome— this project would go beyond that to try to understand what this circuitry actually does.

“I have been interested throughout my entire career in one burning question: how do we turn thought into action?” says John Donaghue, professor of neuroscience at Brown University, who is one of the core scientists involved in the project. Although current brain imaging techniques and cell-based studies offer some insight into how the brain works, they don’t provide a deep enough look at the brain’s inner workings.

“It’s like looking at a page of TIME from six feet away,” he says of imaging methods like functional MRI (fMRI), “You can get a general idea of what’s going on and maybe read the headline but you can’t [understand] the text.” Meanwhile, simply dissecting or manipulating single cells or studying several of them interacting at a time, is “like looking through a microscope and seeing every ink imperfection in a ‘T.’ Maybe you don’t want to do that if you want to understand what a paragraph says.”

What’s missing, says Donoghue, is “that middle level of analysis. How does the brain transform, ‘I want my coffee cup,’ into reaching out with my hand grabbing the cup, bringing it to my mouth and taking a sip, effortlessly, naturally, fluidly.”

Donoghue says that the project’s lofty goal is to provide that level of analysis, in part by developing new tools needed to study neural networks to such a detailed extent. Some of the research will be done on animal models and some will require the development of nanotechnology specifically designed for the task.

In 2006, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen funded, with an initial investment of $100 million, the first complete mapping of the mouse brain, and the Allen Brain Atlas is well on its way to doing the same for the human brain.

“There are already [neuroscientists] working on many aspects of this, so the first thing is to bring them together,” says Donoghue. “The second thing is to bring together physical scientists like nanotechnology engineers and computational people with neuroscientists so they can exchange ideas and develop technologies to revolutionize the study of the brain.”

Ultimately, researchers believe that by understanding the brain at a circuit level, diseases like Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, depression and other brain disorders could be better treated and perhaps even cured.

But some scientists are skeptical that current science is up to the task and are even more wary about whether funding a single project like BAM is the best way to gain this understanding. “I favor diversity in science, by funding lots of scientists pursuing their own research agendas, rather than funding one large project or initiative,” says Ed Vul, assistant professor of psychology at the University of California San Diego, who has published research on flaws in data analysis of fMRI research. Rather than channeling funding into one, potentially misguided pathway, the individual approach “allows funding agencies to adapt nimbly to results, and to what seems to be more or less promising,” Vul says.

Other researchers are concerned that the project might take resources away from trying to cure specific diseases in favor of a basic science approach that might take decades to yield treatments or cures. As Bloomberg reported, Maria Carillo, vice president for medical and scientific relations at the Alzheimer’s Association said that the project should be conducted in concert with approaches like the National Alzheimer’s Plan, instead of separate from them.

Brain mapping is an exciting new area of research, as evidenced by the fact that overseas, European officials recently announced that they will spend 1 billion euro on their own major neuroscience effort, the Human Brain Project. That initiative will attempt to simulate the brain in a computer, based on existing data, rather than map its actions in finer detail. While Donoghue has reservations about the European project because he doesn’t think there is enough data to build a decent model yet, he thinks that BAM might ultimately be able to provide such information.

“I predict the spinoffs will be unbelievable and amazing,” he says of BAM. As long as the President can find a way to pay for it.

All for this kind of important research, but how will this be funded? Private money, maybe? If money needs to be moved around, I am for taking it from the defense kitty and putting it toward research. I just don't see, however, the source of this enormous kind of funding - especially since nearly 50% of Americans don't pay taxes and with The Sequester.

TIME REPORTERS: When you write about our government's initiatives, you must explain the funding part, too. This information won't be handed to you. Be a journalist. Grow some balls. Ask. Then ask again.

The purpose of this is to build a better lie detector for interrogations. DARPA is one of the major sources of funding. Mind reading lie detectors sound like science fiction but they are real, and tons of money is being thrown at it to make it work better.

Research is hurting right now, especially with the new body blow called sequestration. There's no doubt we need to know more about the brain, but the question is whether this is feasible in the current fiscal reality.

Anti-oxidants
do not work for Dementia because they do not pass the blood brain
barrier. Green tea will not work for the same reason, the brain is
very selective of what it allows in the cells. Researchers in 5
countries combined to reverse the memory loss of dementia and mild
Alzheimer's stages with diet alone
based on targeting the brain with nutrients that do pass the brain
barrier

back in the 50's and 60's research was well funded and the economy flourish, today the research funding is as low as ever being, and the US is not longer a research leader. Out of every dollar spend on research there is a huge economic reward in the shape of new business, and therefore new high paid jobs.

Of course he wants a map. He can't abuse the American legal system to oppress the people forever. He needs to find ways to control our minds before his 8 years are up so he can get us to call him Emperor.

Obama just wishes he had a brain.....sorta like the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz. Guess that makes Biden the Cowardly Lion! :D Seriously though, why spend all that money on research when they could spend it on.....I don't know, say INDIGENT HEALTH CARE?

Of course he needs it mapped, how else can he announce his new BRAIN TAX? With Obamacare he created out of thin air, a tax on EVERY medical device that costs more than $100. ... as if health care wasn't high enough already.

Once again stupid adolescent jokes and insults from scientifically illiterate Americans trump any intelligent discussion on the importance of scientific research. Unless the 'spinoffs' are to improve their ability to get high, get drunk or get laid, average Americans have little to say about science.

Yup...we have been coasting on this
research for decades, but it will start to catch up soon...the thing about
basic research is that it is done with NO tangible goal in mind, which makes it
almost certainly to be avoided by corporations.A few do some research like this, Microsoft’s R&D for example, but
probably on a limited basis.

@TaiSatterfield They very likely have it backwards...$140 spent yields $1 in returns. THAT would be more in line with the realities of government. Regardless, when we're in the middle of a fiscal and debt crisis, it's not appropriate to seek new ways to spend taxpayer dollars. This is welfare for scientists.

@lgcalle@horseofcorff Isn't a person claiming to be able to judge my intelligence based on 50 words, themself displaying a lack of understanding of intelligence and how it is measured? Now my I.Q. which measures intelligence as opposed to knowledge is only 131, so yes, I do have limited intelligence, but I did have the ability to foresee that Obamacare was going to cost me my job in the health care industry and it did. I did have the ability to foresee that the act was actuarially unsound and that premiums would go up and they did. But the one thing I was wrong about was taxes. I thought my taxes would go up but they did not. I lost my job, so now I don't pay any.... tee hee! I do have to look at the bright side. And yes, I am intelligent enough to survive his administration without losing my home, because I knew he would destroy my profession and I did use those three years to pay off the mortgage before the provisions actually took effect in 2013.

@DanitaSilver@BrianMathies@TaiSatterfield Danita do you read what you post? I think you would be a beneficiary of a project such as a brain map, it would help to find yours, is obvious you have a very low intellect..