Dell first stunned the tech industry by announcing back in
May that it would adopt
AMD Opteron processors for its server systems. In the past few weeks there
has been increasing speculation over Dell's use of AMD processors in notebooks.
Although there was confirmation
of the move from an unnamed Dell executive as well as from a general
manager of AMD’s Taiwanese operations, the company still has not released an
official statement regarding the use of AMD processors in the mobile sector.
The company did, however, announce
today its plans to incorporate AMD processors into its Dimension desktop
range next month along with dual-socket and multi-processor servers using AMD
Opteron processors.

Dell’s adoption of AMD processors for the desktop confirms an earlier
report by a Citigroup analyst back in mid-June. At the time, analyst Jeff
Young reported that Dell would announce entry-level desktops using AMD processors
in September -- the prediction was right on the money. Although Dell failed to
go into detail on how many product lines within the Dimension family would be
introduced or what processors would be used, speculation has been that Sempron
and Athlon 64 X2 processors will be used.

As for AMD Opteron processors in Dell severs, the
announcement comes at a time when Intel is now showing off a competitive
alternative in the form of Woodcrest.
Early testing
has shown that Woodcrest outperforms
the latest AMD Opteron processors across the board while offering lower power
consumption. The same could be said for Intel on the desktop as its Core 2 Duo
and Core 2 Extreme processors have pretty much swept the
boards in performance. It wasn’t too long ago that AMD was enjoying this enviable
position in both the desktop and server arena.

But Dell shouldn’t be too concerned at the moment at AMD isn’t
sitting still. On the August 15, AMD announced its new Opteron Socket F
processors which take advantage of DDR2 memory and a new socket design. The
new dual-core processors are available in speeds ranging from 1.8GHz to 2.8GHz
and can also be had in HE variants which consume just 55 watts of power. On the
same day, AMD also announced that it had taped out its first
native quad-core Opterons. The quad-core processors will be delivered to
customers in mid-2007.

Comments

Threshold

Username

Password

remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Don't know what this helps Dell with? They are more or less becoming a whore for CPU vendors to toy around with. Each new AMD announcement comes on the heels of a terrible quarter. Do they even have a plan of how they plan to sell AMD?

That's upto Dell to decide, AMD-ATI only ensures the two (AMD/ATI) will collaborate more closely together in the future. Its not like ATI's chipset production or business took off magically immediately after their acquisition announcement. Dell probably still prefers Nvidia for most stuff, and this may not help ATI-AMD all that much.

Bottom-line still up in the air, still wonder how things will execute with these two. Will be interesting how AMD placates Nvidia on this.

AMD a platform company?... now which company said "We want to provide an ecosystem of choice."

Don't know what this helps Dell with? They are more or less becoming a whore for CPU vendors to toy around with. Each new AMD announcement comes on the heels of a terrible quarter. Do they even have a plan of how they plan to sell AMD?

That's upto Dell to decide, AMD-ATI only ensures the two (AMD/ATI) will collaborate more closely together in the future. Its not like ATI's chipset production or business took off magically immediately after their acquisition announcement. Dell probably still prefers Nvidia for most stuff, and this may not help ATI-AMD all that much.

Bottom-line still up in the air, still wonder how things will execute with these two. Will be interesting how AMD placates Nvidia on this.

AMD a platform company?... now which company said "We want to provide an ecosystem of choice."

quote: That's upto Dell to decide, AMD-ATI only ensures the two (AMD/ATI) will collaborate more closely together in the future. Its not like ATI's chipset production or business took off magically immediately after their acquisition announcement. Dell probably still prefers Nvidia for most stuff, and this may not help ATI-AMD all that much.

I'd have to agree with this for now, as the AMD/ATI deal isnt complete yet. But in the near future AMD will probably give Dell (and other PC makers) discounted price incentives to buy complete CPU/GPU/MB platforms, which is an advantage only Intel could offer in the past.

Unlike Intel, which must run far and wide to provide... what?
Intel builds processors, chipsets, ethernet controllers, graphic (integrated only) chipsets, and so on. AMD does not have the production diversity Intel has right now

The AMD/ATI combo is making all of those things and more. AMD has made ethernet controllers forever for example, in fact they offered the "first complete ethernet chipset". You'd be surprised how many chips in random consumer electronics were made by either AMD or ATI.