Explains why rural industrial land use should be
dealt with in the same context as all industrial and commercial land use.

236

Chair Garrard

Comments on the success of previousLCDC Task Forces, asking why wait for
another task force.

245

Shetterly

Speaks to accomplishments of LCDC Task Force.

273

Chair Garrard

Asks for comment on the “much ado about nothing”
claim made by the Umatilla County Planning Director.

275

Shetterly

Summarizes the economic development mission of LCDC.

291

Sen. Shields

Questions why compromise on sunset “fell apart
because it seems like good policy.”

307

Sen. Ringo

Explains support for the removing the sunset.

324

Shetterly

Addresses the relationship between removal of sunset
and opportunity in Umatilla County.

342

Sen. Ringo

States that it is not his role to analyze what is
needed for economic development in Umatilla County

345

Shetterly

Explains that LCDC is asking for the opportunity to
address the land use issues as a part of comprehensive statewide policy as
opposed to directing a particular outcome to a particular county.

355

Chair Garrard

Questions whether 13,000 acres is a statewide issue.

358

Shetterly

Restates how the scope of LCDC Task Force is not
limited to outside the Willamette Valley.

362

Chair Garrard

Explains why the removal of sunset is a reasonable
request by Umatilla County.

381

Shetterly

States that LCDC has responded to requests by
Umatilla County and LCDC should be allowed to finish the work that was
started.

400

Mike Carrier

Natural Resource Policy Director, Office of The
Governor. Submits and summarizes written testimony in support of maintaining
the sunset (EXHIBIT D).

TAPE 3, A

008

Sen. Nelson

Comments on the public’s “huge distrust of government
committees.”

024

Shetterly

Responds how LCDC serves citizens statewide and asks
that LCDC be allowed to fulfill its commitment and earn the trust of people.

035

Sen. Nelson

Asks who are the members of LCDC Task Force.

037

Shetterly

Identifies the members of the LCDC Task Force.

042

Sen. Nelson

Questions why land use and development should be put
off for another 15 months.

053

Sen. Shields

Explains why support of –B12 amendments would be a
symbolic vote of confidence in LCDC.

065

Sen. Shields

Comments on the possibility The Governor vetoing the
bill.

070

Carrier

Responds to the possibility of a Governors’ veto and
to the statement that “this is going to be a political decision.”

095

Shetterly

Asks for LCDC to have “a chance to demonstrate good
faith.”

107

Harlan Levy

Representative, Oregon Association of Realtors.
Testifies in support of removing the sunset clause.

127

Levy

Explains why the sunset clause was “installed” in HB
2689 (2003).

143

Levy

Addresses the “exception” granted to Umatilla County
and states that the removal of the sunset, while not a significant change,
would be a symbolic change in the statewide land use planning program.

169

Linda Ludwig

Senior Staff Associate, League of Oregon Cities
(LOC). Cites provision from HB 2458B relating to the involvement of cities in
industrial and commercial land use along urban growth boundaries.

197

Sen. Ringo

Questions the impact of citing the provision.

199

Ludwig

Explains why the provision, while not in the
language of HB 2458B, is applicable to current land use decisions.

218

Sen. Ringo

Objects to new information being brought forward by
LOC at this point in process.

222

Ludwig

Explains why the information is not new and is
identical to testimony given by LOC at the first Conference Committee on HB
2458B.

228

Rep.
Jenson

MOTION:Moves HB 2458B to the floor with the
recommendation that the House CONCUR in Senate amendments dated 06/13/05 and
that the bill be FURTHER AMENDED by –B11 Amendments dated 07/06/05 and the
measure be REPASSED.

238

Sen. Ringo

Questions what the effect of -B11 amendments.

243

Sandy Thiele-Cirka

Committee Administrator. Explains how –B11
amendments are identical to previous amendments and just reflect that a
second Conference Committee was held.

251

Sen. Ringo

Questions if sunset clause was removed after initial
Conference Committee.

254

Thiele-Cirka

Explains that the amendments had to be recreated
because only one chamber took action after last Conference Committee.