bruce wrote:
> I am sure I could collect the information. The big question for me is
> whether we _want_ such information in the release notes. The release
> notes, for me, is for people to read about the release changes, and give
> a small amount of credit to the author, and indicate who is mostly
> responsible for the features, in case it has problems.
>
> I think adding sponsors to the release notes is going to make the
> release notes look like a billboard, and I am not in favor of this.
>
> Obviously we don't even care to update the web site about sponsorships,
> so why put in everyone's face in the release notes when we don't even do
> the minimal of updating our own web site with this information.
>
> I agree press releases are the natural place for this and I support more
> activity in that area.
Let me add that I often mention the company sponsoring a features when I
do a press interview or talk about a feature at a conference, if I know
who the sponsor is. It would be good to at least have a wiki page where
we could list the sponsors so people who publicize features would know.
I know I mentioned NEC as the sponsor of our SE-Linux integration during
my InformationWeek interview with Josh Berkus. The article mentions
KaiGai Kohei, but not NEC:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/development/database/229402894?pgno=2
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +