Pages

Monday, April 15, 2013

Early Evidence Indicates Boston Bombing Was a False Flag

(Note: it has subsequently come to light that the Boston Globe tweet actually occurred 54 minutes after the
tweet about the two bombings. The reference to a "controlled explosion"
was in fact a reference to the detonation of a secondary device.)

Only hours after two bombs were detonated near the finish line of a Boston
marathon, evidence is beginning to emerge suggesting that the act may have been
a false flag attack.

While reports continue to emerge from the scene, a
number of facts point toward the typical setup used to devise, control, and
execute such an attack as took place around the 9/11, 7/7, and OKC bombings as
well as the Aurora and Sandy Hook shootings.

One of the hallmark signals
of a false flag attack, as Webster Tarpley has expertly demonstrated in his
book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, is the use of drills acting as a cover for sinister
plans and mechanizations within the halls of the shadow government itself which
ultimately manifest as false flag terror attacks. Much like the aforementioned
attacks, the Boston Bombing also carried the trademark “coincidence” of a drill
scheduled to take place at almost exactly the same time that the bombs were
being detonated at the marathon.

For instance, earlier in the morning of
April 15, 2013, the Boston Globe tweeted “Officials: There will be a controlled
explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad
activities.”
In addition, it was reported by Business
Insider in the article “2 More Explosive Devices Found At Boston Marathon,”[1] that a
police scanner “said police were going to do a third, controlled explosion on
the 600 Block of Boylston Street.”

Yet, despite the fact that the police had
scheduled a highly “coincidental” explosion at the JFK Library, much of the
mainstream reports regarding the device have presented it as another part of the
Boston Bombing itself.

In fact, the New York Post reported almost the
polar opposite of the Boston Globe in regards to the second device. It said,
“Police confirmed a third explosion at JFK Library in Boston. Boston fire
officials confirmed during a press conference that the third explosion was
linked to the ones that occurred at the Marathon. There were no injuries
reported from the third bombing.”

Andrew Katz of TIME tweeted that
“police were investigating reports of bombs in other parts of the city,” and
“Citing a police scanner, Katz tweeted that there was an ‘incendiary device’
possible at JFK Library as well as ‘another device’ in front of Boston’s luxury
Mandarin Hotel. “

Business Insider also reported that, around 3 p.m.,
there was a fire inside the JFK Library but states that it was not related to
the “terrorist bombings.” This, as I mentioned, is in direct contradiction to
the later reports that the “fire” was actually an explosion related to the
terror bombing.

Thus,
we have a device planted inside the library by the police and confirmation that
an explosion at the library was connected to the Boston Bombing. This fact alone
should be enough to raise questions regarding the individuals responsible for
the bombing. If the police had planted a device inside the Library and the
explosion was related to the Boston Bombing, should there not be an immediate
investigation of the police?

It should also be noted that Chris Faraone
of the Boston Phoenix also tweeted that a police officer near the finish line
stated, “There are secondary devices that have been found and are
unexploded.”

Also interesting, however, is the fact that the University
of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, Ali Stevenson, stated that bomb sniffing dogs
were present at both the start and finish lines.

Speaking to Local 15, the local Boston news station, Stevenson
stated, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a
drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort
of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

At this time,
law enforcement officials state that they have identified a suspect, a Saudi
national currently in the hospital for shrapnel wounds. One must also wonder if
this individual is nothing more than a mere patsy in yet another
government-sponsored false flag. It is highly dubious that an individual (with
the exception of a suicide bomber which this individual’s survival excludes him
from) setting off such powerful bombs would stand so close to them as to be
injured by shrapnel.

Ali Stevenson also stated that there was no doubt in
his mind that the bombings were intentional and this much is quite
clear.

The question, however, is who was behind them?

As Mike Adams of Natural News writes, “It’s far too early to
take an informed guess on all this. However, it is indisputable that the FBI is
actively engaged in carrying out bomb plots in the United States, then
halting them at the last minute to “catch the terrorists.” This fact has been
covered by the New York Times, among other publications.”

Indeed.
And the track record of the FBI, as well as other elements of the governmental
establishment, should be reason enough for us to continue watching these
developments and the subsequent claims made by these agencies and individuals.

Afraa Dagher Twitter

Syriana Afraa

Eva Bartlett

Observations from Occupied Palestine: Gaza – In Gaza

Quoth The Raven, "Veritas"

Translate

Support BrandonTurbeville.com!

Please help support the website by shopping with our Amazon link by clicking on the icon above. It will cost you nothing extra but you can still help support the site simply by clicking on the link above before adding items to your cart. Your support is much appreciated!

Free PDF: The Difference It Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President