Earlier today Bill C-304 passed Second Reading in the House of Commons. Bill C-304 is an act to strip the censorship powers from the fanatics at the Canadian Human Rights Commission. The vote was 158 in favour and 131 opposed. The Conservative Party and one Liberal MP carried the vote to a cheer in the house. This is one more nail in the censorship coffin of Section 13.

The next steps for Bill C-304 are:

1.Review at the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. 2.Bill is referred back to Parliament with any amendments for third and final reading. 3.Senate of Canada reviews bill. 4.Once passed in the Senate the bill becomes law and Section 13 and 54 of the Canadian Human Rights Act are repealed!

Here is the details of what happened today in Parliament from the Feb 15, 2012 Journal.

Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division

YEAS: 158, NAYS: 131

YEAS -- POUR[/t]

[/t]

AblonczyDanielLebelSeebackSheaShipleyShory

Total: -- 158[/t]

NAYS -- CONTRE[/t]

[/t]

Allen (Welland)CotlerHyerNash

Total: -- 131[/t]

Accordingly, Bill C-304, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act (protecting freedom), was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

-------------------------------------------

>Canada is about to repeal the Jewish inspired "Hate Laws".And notice who voted in favour of Censorship: THE LIBERALS & THE GREENS!The Greens: always the lackeys of the Rodents!

Another One Bites The DustFederal records show that Sharmarke Mohamed was finally punted from Canada on April 16. "'If he had come from, say, Sweden, he would not only have been found inadmissible [under the Immigration Act] for serious criminality, but, in all likelihood, would have been deported long ago. However, he is a refugee from Somalia and is protected.' ... Because he came here from war torn Somalia, he has been allowed to linger, causing mayhem through his escalating violence, a Federal CourtUnited NationsJustice Sean Harrington has ruled. Chief Justice Pierre Blais, of the Federal Court of Appeal, upheld the decision, clearing the way for [Mohamed's removal]. Immigration officials had hoped he had left the violence behind when he came to Canada in 1990 at the age of 27. ... Charter rights under Section 7, claiming it would 'jeopardize' his life and security." (National Post, May 7, 2012Note, Sharmarke Mohamed should not be confused with Sharmarke Mohamed Warsame. Also Somali, Sharmarke Mohamed Warsame was a well known local drug dealer on the Brooks, Alberta circuit. Found beaten to death in a field outside that town in 2008, the beat down was allegedly reprisal for holding an 18-year-old local girl against her will and raping her repeatedly. Does anyone ever answer for the failed decisions of our immigration and refugee admission system?[This article appears in the May, 2012 issue of the CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE. Published monthly, the CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE is available by subscription for $30 per year. You can subscribe by sending a cheque or VISA number and expiry date to CANADIAN IMMIGRATION HOTLINE, P.O. Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3.]

--------------------

Nothing except trouble from Somalis - almost as bad as Nigerians.These are the likes those maruana/heroin smokers, Traitors of WHY NOTs rushed to help on the beach -and then disappeard quickly when the police arrived!

The above story highlights the "Joys of Multiculturalism".Highlights the folly of a pathetic Prime Minister:"Our society has to adapt to Multiculturalism".

Soon, all this nonsense will have to stop.The end of this madness is at hand: this is 2012.E poi, faremo i conti - con tutti gl'interessi!

"Nothing except trouble from Somalis - almost as bad as Nigerians.These are the likes those maruana/heroin smokers, Traitors of WHY NOTs rushed to help on the beach -and then disappeard quickly when the police arrived!"

Why Not has been hijacked by the ToM and the usual culture distorters,What eventually started out as proposals to bypass the "system" - the whole concept changed drastically when ToM stated "WhyNot celebrates diversity" and immediately associated them with a "pro-refugee tag" that the naive hippies will now be forced to adapt.

With what intent and arrogance did ToM arrive to this conclusion? Do they even know that the original founder was dismissed just a few days ago?This is the usual style of media to ride every wave and channel it to their usual propaganda.Keep hood-winking the people - the truth will inevitably emerge, even more forcefully.

May this be a lesson to all well meaning people out there, you can never deal with the government, such as establishing an NGO etc to initiate change; by doing so - one is immediately compromised and accepting his fate as a servant of corrupted authorities.

The Harper government is utterly Zionist and 110% Israel First. It seems there's no depth they're not prepared to plunge in their slavish support for the most radical elements among those occupying the land of others, Palestine, whose indigenous population, Moslem and Christian, has been expelled and persecuted by Zionist newcomers over the past 60-some years.

Prime Minister Harper has declared that "Israel's values are Canada's values" and "an attack on Israel is an attack on Canada." CTV NEWS (November 12, 2010) reported: " Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he is prepared to suffer any political backlash that comes his way for speaking out against anti-Israel rhetoric." On November 8, 2010,

In January, 2012, Foreign Minister John Baird made his third visit to Israel -- an inordinate amount of attention to a tiny and ultra-controversial state. There he was, dressed as a perfect clown with a yamulka -- a skull cap and symbol of a religion that is not his -- pledging support for foreign invaders. Worse, he was accompanied by a lobbyist for an ultra-radical Zionist sect then surprised people by saying 'Canada does not stand behind Israel... .' After a slight pause he continued: 'Canada stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel' in any threats and challenges it may face. He was met with warm applause.

Canada's Foreign Minister John Baird and his "dear friend" and rabbi Chaim MendelsohnThe Lubavitchers are a radical Hasidic sect. According to Wikipedia, their long-time head, the late Menachem "Schneerson looked to Torah law for the appropriate view of the Israeli-Arab conflict. He maintained that as a matter of Jewish law,[29] any territorial concession on Israel's part would endanger the lives of all Jews in the Land of Israel, and is therefore forbidden. He also insisted that even discussing the possibility of such concessions showed weakness, would encourage Arab attacks, and therefore endanger Jewish lives.

Dennis Greunding, a Canadian writer, noted on February 5, 2012: "The Conservative government overruled federal bureaucrats and gave $1-million to a social hall project submitted by an Ottawa rabbi with close ties to Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird.Canada: an utterly corrupted Judaized country.The Rodents control the entire Culture theough their Media.The Jews push for Multiculturalism and the invasion of Canada by non Europids.

Dieudonne Done in By Jewish Lobby: Shows Cancelled in MontrealDieudonne M'bala M'bala is a bit of an odd duck. He's a French comedian and satirist. Born of a White woman from Brittany and a Negro father from the Cameroons, he had a solid middle class upbringing. His humour is fearless and he has run into pressure from, get this, militant anti-racists and the Zionist censors. He has even welcomed revisionist historian Robert Faurisson and former Front National leader Jean-Marie LePen to his performances and invited them to be recognized on stage. He has performed to considerable acclaim on previous occasions in Montreal and Quebec City. He was scheduled for four shows in Montreal this week, Once again Canada's self-styled thought police have decided whom Canadians can and cannot hear. The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, successor to the Canadian Jewish Congress, raised an unholy ruckus and Dieudonne's Montreal appearance was quickly cancelled.The Israel First National Post (Give us back Jesus), has been branded 'a long litany of anti-Semitic comments' in the Belgian press. An article in Le Soir Asking a Canadian company to invoke the same sort of brutal censorship policies as France would seem to violate Anglo-Saxon attachment tp free speech, to say nothing of prejudging an artistic performance on the basis of what the French comedian might say. The National Post'They told us it was clearly not their intent to offer a tribune to any form of racism or anti-Semitism,' Mr. Ouellette said. 'They pledged that they would be reviewing the process by which they deal with foreign artists like this, that they would be more vigilant in the future.'The comments from his fans that followed included a number of anti-Semitic remarks. Mr. Ouellette said he and Mr. Del Negro received 'several threatening emails and hateful messages' after their letter appeared on Facebook.So, Evenko remained committed to the extraordinary practice of honouring a contract.Well, not for long. In fact, the commitment survived barely 48 hours after the publicity blast. Long-time observers of the tenuous commitment of Canada's business establishment to such old fashioned principles as freedom of speech in the face of negative publicity engineered by the thought control forces of the Jewish lobby might have predicted that the resolve would not last long. They were right.Today's National PostNeedless to say the Zionist censors were pleased. The National PostMontreal Gazette, May 14, 2012)Last week Bob Hepburn of the Toronto Star (May 9, 2012) wrote a puff piece about a new institute trying to figure out why there are negative feelings toward Jews, misnamed "anti-Semitism." "When Catherine Chatterley was growing up in Winnipeg, the first serious book she read was The Diary of Anne FrankFor Chatterley, who was raised in a devout Lutheran home, the famous book sparked a lifelong fascination with the Jewish people, the Holocaust and anti-Semitism.Canadian Institute for the Study of Anti-Semitism (CISA) is based."Instead of blaming the poor Christians, Chatterley might look at incidents like the silencing of Dieudonne. Perhaps, people get fed up when spokesmen for a certain group consistently try to silence people they don't like and control whom we get to see and hear. The Zionist lobbyists are Canada's foremost proponents of censorship. Can you remember the last time a spokesman for Canadian Scots or Icelanders, if there even are such spokesman, demanded that this or that comedian be silenced for saying unkind things about their group?

-------------------

The eternal pests! - That Tribe of Rodents.Complaining, censoring, crying out loud, causing mischief everywhere.Their hubris blinds Them as to their imminent demise.

British Columbia Wants to Impose Police State Gags on Discussion of Health Threats in Ag and Fish FarmsWhat's the problem with governments? Do they gain power and then seek to assume total power over the groaning taxpayers who fund them? Apparently, this is so in British Columbia."B.C.'s Liberal government is poised to further choke off the flow of public information, this time with respect to disease outbreaks. The Animal Health Act, expected to be passed into law by month's end, expressly over-rides B.C.'s Freedom of Information Act, duct-taping shut the mouths of any citizens - or journalists - who would publicly identify the location of an outbreak of agriculture-related disease such as the deadly bird flu.

'A person must refuse, despite the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, to disclose . . . information that would reveal that a notifiable or reportable disease is or may be present in a specific place or on or in a specific vehicle,' Section 16 of the Act reads.

It is quite conceivable that the provincial government, in the event of a disease outbreak at a farm, would delay releasing a warning in order to protect the farm in question or the industry it's part of.In that event, should you as a citizen hear about the outbreak, or if you were an employee at an affected farm, you would be breaking the law by speaking publicly about it or bringing concerns to the media." (The Province, May 22, 2012)The idea that a person reporting a concern about an agricultural illness or a disease on a fish farm would face a provincial gag backed up by hefty fines and/or imprisonment is outrageous. There should be riots of anger to defy those tyrants who would dare silence their fellow citizens. We have for years challenged Canadians to show thier thirst for freedom by protesting and defying those tyrants who would dare silence them, Yes, of course, it would be wrong to spread false rumours about health threats on farms or fish farms,. Surely, though, the laws of libel and slander, strict as they are in Canada, are more than adequate to deal with any bad faith writings of that sort.The Province report continues: "Citizens or journalists breaking the Animal Health Act but not charged with an offence can be slapped with 'administrative penalties,' which are fines. And the legislation contains an additional attack on rights of citizens: if you don't pay your fine, a government representative simply files a paper in court that is the same, according to Sec. 80(2) of the Act, 'as if it were a judgment of the court with which it is filed.'Except for the absence of a judge or any semblance of due process.Ultimately, this legislation aims to protect businesses from disclosure of information that may harm their financial interests.As B.C. Freedom of Information commissioner Elizabeth Denham revealed in a letter to provincial Agriculture Minister Don McRae, his ministry has expressed concern that the province's legal protection of "'hird-party business interests . . . does not adequately protect information related to farmers engaged in animal-health programs or subject to disease-management actions.'Ministry employees, animal-health inspectors and laboratory employees are specifically barred from disclosing information about farm-disease outbreaks.

Denham noted that it's extremely rare for a law to override freedom of information legislation. The Animal Health Act removes "the public's right to access various records regarding animal testing, including actions and reports relating to animal-disease management," Den-ham wrote.

The Animal Health Act would override another provincial law, the Offence Act. While the Offence Act caps punishment at a $2,000 fine and six months in jail for offences not drawing higher penalties in other legislation, the Animal Health Act says that section of the Offence Act doesn't apply, and lays out a punishment regime with penal-ties reaching to $75,000 fines and two years in prison. The offence of failing to keep information confidential falls among the violations drawing the highest penalties."Paul FrommDirectorCANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

B.C. law to ban information on farm outbreaksOverrides Freedom of Information law, carries stiff penaltyBy Ethan Baron, The Province May 22, 2012 Ethan BaronPhotograph by: Ginger Sedlarova , The ProvinceB.C.'s Liberal government is poised to further choke off the flow of public information, this time with respect to disease outbreaks. The Animal Health Act, expected to be passed into law by month's end, expressly over-rides B.C.'s Freedom of Information Act, duct-taping shut the mouths of any citizens - or journalists - who would publicly identify the location of an outbreak of agriculture-related disease such as the deadly bird flu."A person must refuse, despite the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, to disclose . . . information that would reveal that a notifiable or reportable disease is or may be present in a specific place or on or in a specific vehicle," Section 16 of the Act reads.It is quite conceivable that the provincial government, in the event of a disease outbreak at a farm, would delay releasing a warning in order to protect the farm in question or the industry it's part of.In that event, should you as a citizen hear about the outbreak, or if you were an employee at an affected farm, you would be breaking the law by speaking publicly about it or bringing concerns to the media.Citizens or journalists breaking the Animal Health Act but not charged with an offence can be slapped with "administrative penalties," which are fines. And the legislation contains an additional attack on rights of citizens: if you don't pay your fine, a government representative simply files a paper in court that is the same, according to Sec. 80(2) of the Act, "as if it were a judgment of the court with which it is filed."Except for the absence of a judge or any semblance of due process.Ultimately, this legislation aims to protect businesses from disclosure of information that may harm their financial interests.As B.C. Freedom of Information commissioner Elizabeth Denham revealed in a letter to provincial Agriculture Minister Don McRae, his ministry has expressed concern that the province's legal protection of "third-party business interests . . . does not adequately protect information related to farmers engaged in animal-health programs or subject to disease-management actions."Ministry employees, animal-health inspectors and laboratory employees are specifically barred from disclosing information about farm-disease outbreaks.Denham noted that it's extremely rare for a law to override freedom of information legislation. The Animal Health Act removes "the public's right to access various records regarding animal testing, including actions and reports relating to animal-disease management," Den-ham wrote.The Animal Health Act would override another provincial law, the Offence Act. While the Offence Act caps punishment at a $2,000 fine and six months in jail for offences not drawing higher penalties in other legislation, the Animal Health Act says that section of the Offence Act doesn't apply, and lays out a punishment regime with penal-ties reaching to $75,000 fines and two years in prison. The offence of failing to keep information confidential falls among the violations drawing the highest penalties.-------------------

Canada, a wholesome and proud Country just 50 years ago.Today, completely Judaized, corrupted by the Eternal Pests.Those Rodents who choke Freedom of Expression and Diffusion of Ideas.

Those who opened Canada's borders to millions of non Europid savages.Those who turned once clean, safe Canadian cities into jungles and Jamaicas.Those who infected Canada with the gangrene of Multiculturalism.

They corrupt, pollute anything they touch, wherever they are.The expression of the Negative Force, that Satanic Spirit of the Demiurge.Innately anti-Aryan - an implacable Hatred towards us, Europids.

These parents should be released from custody and deported. After all they acted according to their strict ethical and moral strictures. Who are we to interfere with cultural traditions and behaviour of peoples of other etnias ? In Afghanistan and muslim societies these acts are normal and par for the course. Only a minute , tiny minority of cases is exposed from time to time. Let them be themselves; just keep them as far away as possible and do not have social or political intercourse with these races.

Canada, a once all White Country up to the 60s, now enjoying multiculturalism.Young monkeys roam a Supermarket and help themselves to the fruits on the trees!The very last comment by the journalist: "Police have to adapt".

Mela veru, ghandu ragun il-Patetiku: "It is our society that has to adapt to Multiculturalism."This is what is coming to our Island - thanks to the Corrupt Catholic Church and perfidious Jesuits.

For it was the church and Jesuits who opened the door to this horrendous, African invasion.The Catholic Church that callously betrayed our People.We will never forget these traitors.