Sunday, August 24, 2008

"I have challenged AZUStitches77’s claim that all sex offenders are rapists or one day will be rapists by asking him to provide factual data to support these absurd statements. To date, AZUStitches has not provided any factual data. Why?"

So speaks the "Truthseeker" SOClear Media's newest and brightest sex offender defender and distorted out of control harassing fool. You may recognize him as ApparitionZ, the guy who hits all the YouTube videos with inane blurbs of nonsense reminiscent of the tactics used by the nodding pedo heads of '07.

Why have I not provided the factual data he requested? Why, it's quite simple. I never said that. Truthseeker, however, DID claim that the majority of registered sex offenders are on the registry for such things as "urinating in public" (that's his favorite argument btw), mooning people, having consensual sex, or in his case "merely looking at a few dirty pictures". That he seems to have absolutely no realization of the seriousness of his crime is great cause for concern regarding the likelihood of him re-offending. After all.....it was just some sexual pleasure at the expense of sexually abused children, wasn't it? He's become the newest sex offender vigilante on YouTube making wild unsupportable accusations and making a total nuisance of himself. Look:

"AZU = Murderer"

"So﻿ why do these vigilantes believe public urinators and teenagers having consensual sex should be murdered? Answer : they are scum."

"AZU believes﻿ in murdering children for playing doctor. What a sicko!"

"Oh, so you guys murder gay people too, interesting."

"I hear antipaedo used to make his own child porn, be warned!"

"I have proof that vigilantes burned down the home of a former offender in Tennessee and wound up murdering his wife! One of a number of violent attacks by the PJ Cult."

Remember how Zman used to go around to blogs and news sites always repeating "Educate yourself! Visit my blog and learn the REAL FACTS"? Remember that? Well Truthseeker has his own mantra that doesn't even make sense. Taking information from various places he tries to put it together into a new FACT.

"According to the Department Of Justice , less than 8% of sex offenders re-offend and most sexual abuse is committed by someone who is not on a registry which debunks the myth of “stranger danger” in the majority of cases."

Does that statement make sense? Does he understand what he said? Let's listen to the Truthseekers mantra, it goes like this:

Now, let's listen to him explain how news stories are FACTUAL as long as they are on Zman's site.......but not if you just go out and read them yourself of course.

I am a vigilante cult leader for voicing my opinion. That opinion makes me 'violent'. So what does Truthseeker's make him? A ticking time bomb? Not only does he believe that Stitches77 voicing opinions over child sexual abuse is more dangerous that his child molesting pals.....molesting children but he even denies child sexual abuse even exists! NOOOO You weren't abused! Your child wasn't groomed and molested! It's all a myth, an overblown hysterical biased media report to make you think you were raped when you were only mooned. On one of his podcasts he goes so far as to claim the majority of sex offenders are on the registry for urinating in public and demands to know why we aren't putting women on the registry for dressing skimpily at the beach. He says:

There are a variety of reasons why a person would view images deemed as child porn. It may simply be out of research as in the case of Pete Townshend (”The Who”) or to help authorities find the people who produce such materials. Factually, most who only view these images do not go on to hurt anyone.

Completely disregarding:

"Experts have often wondered what proportion of men who download explicit sexual images of children also molest them. A new government study of convicted Internet offenders suggests that the number may be startlingly high: 85 percent of the offenders said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors, from inappropriate touching to rape."

Well he does have the facts after all doesn't he? What's a few dirty pictures? I guess he wants to make you think "a few dirty pictures" is nothing really to be concerned about, I mean after all he did it, and look at what a nice guy HE is. Maybe he should have read this:

U.S. criminal investigator Flint Waters works undercover in the war on child pornography. And just like the other 800 licensed investigators working the internet, he goes for stress counseling often. Is it any wonder why? He describes some of the recent things he's found.

"A video of a toddler on a changing table who is penetrated by an adult male."

"Pictures of a young girl, 6 or 7 years old, nude, tied to a chair and being penetrated by a dog."

How dare he try to sugar coat child sexual abuse, or ANY sexual abuse for that matter? These people actually believe that they can and will change people's minds about them by dismissing as insignificant the horror of what it's really like. They call victims "professional victims" while claiming that THEY are victims. "Oh they should just pick themselves up and go on and stop being victims" I cannot even count the number of RSO activists and pedo activists alike who have made that statement, showing clearly that they have no understanding whatsoever of the true effects of being sexually abused and how it differs from other crimes. Tom Madison claims less than 1% of RSO's are pedophiles, a completely made up figure, he either made it up himself or someone LIED to him and he believed it. I tend to think he made it up.

Listen:

Ok, we want the truth. Let's talk truth. He finally said something that was true:

Yes that's true. I did say that the DOJ did NOT report that 95% of all sex crimes are committed by someone not on the registry. I said it because it's true. We've been harping on this for a year now and they cannot get it through their heads.

A recidivism rate does not equal a crime rate. Furthermore that 3.5% recidivism statistic was spread out over a period of three years, it was not an annual figure. It was not a measurement of the percentage of crimes committed. It was a measurement of re-offending. The DOJ report DOES NOT SAY how many people convicted of a new sex crime in any given year are or are not already on the sex offender registry. You cannot take one statistic and force it into meaning something it does not mean.

For example, let's say you have say 1000 men in 2007 that were RSO's that you followed. Let's say 3% of them re-offended. That doesn't mean that 97% of all sex crimes were committed by someone not already convicted of a sex crime. The only conclusion you can factually draw from that scenario is that 3% re-offended and 97% didn't. You can bet that there were other RSO's in that same time period who re-offended after a varied period of time. But the study wasn't measuring them. The recidivism rate released by the Department of Justice does not mean what they say it means. I don't know how many other ways to say it where they can understand. I know they want to believe it, I know they DO believe it, but it's because the only people they are listening to are people who spend their time trying to find some reason, some excuse, some something somebody anybody to blame except for themselves.

When Tom Madison goes on National TV and says the things he says, he makes a fool of himself in more ways than just losing control and acting like a wild and crazy impulsive and angry sex offender. He makes himself look stupid, because he is uninformed. He can't even read and comprehend a DOJ report.

However, occasionally you find a mind that's a notch up from these other guys. Let's pay attention to him for a moment. Vanguard a staff member of Sosen doesn't get it either but I admit he's closer than the others. He tried to help his people out, and I dare say he got nowhere. They didn't want to hear what he had to say and he didn't push the issue. He's well aware I'm sure of how irritable they get when someone disagrees with them. Even Derek got in on it. I'm going to show you the mentality of these people..... the sheer brain power in action. Read for yourself some snippets of their conversation:

blueshift:

"This is some thing i got in my mail today, form eAdvoate I think. This could be a holy grail question and and answer will debunk or limits the ligamancy of the registry. Its a question I have seen asked many times, but never in this way.

"whether the risk of offending For an ex-felon ever becomes similar, or equal to, the risk of offending for someone who has never offended at all? If so, after what period of time since the last arrest or conviction does this occur?"

So when is a former sexual offender's risk the same as the general population?"

"just the fact that the chances of someone not on the registry offending is 95% and someone who is on the registry is less than 5% tells me that a former sex offender's risk is already less than the general population"

oldman_inmaine:

"I pointed this statistical probability out in a local newspaper once while in a conversation with a poster called stitches. They were quite offended at the idea that I would suggest that their own mathematical formula indicated that they represented a far greater danger to the general population than an ex-sex offender.

So yes the next time you get into a heated discussion with some person that is Downing the ex-sex offender just remember the probabilities of that person crossing the tracks in your direction is a little higher than the probability that you may back step and recommit a crime. laughing

Any mathematical geniuses out there?"

flowergirl_1970:

"Harris/Hanson (one or the other or both) out of Canada looked at this and found that the risk reduces to 0% (I think) 15-20years post release"

Vanguard:

"Yes, the general public is 95% more likely to commit a new sex offense. BUT... there are less than a million registered offenders in a county with 300 million people, and there are only tens of thousands of sex offensed committed.

Let's say there are 100,000 registerable sex offenses committed per year. That leaves the following:

5% committed by RSO's, or 5,000 offenses. Out of a million offenders, that makes 1 in 200 offenders commit a new crime.

95% committed by non-RSO's, or 95,000 offenses. Out of 300 million people, that makes 1 in 3,150 non-RSO's commit a new crime.

Therefore, the anti's could use the argument that RSO's are over 15 times likely to commit a new sex offense."

Somehow I think they are coming to that conclusion the wrong way, by counting recidivism as the basis for assuming how many RSOs actually re-offend in the given year. The DOJ study found the number of sex offenders in the study who re-offended was about 550 of 9000 in 3 years, while 3500 or so of the 240,000 NON-RSOs committed a sex crime. That's six times the number of non-sex offenders committing a sex crime as sex offenders, not counting first time offenders"

Well thanks Vanguard and Derek, you see Derek using YOUR numbers you provided from the 1994 DOJ report on Recidivism, you are correct that the non-Rso felons committed SIX times the number of offenses, but what does that mean really? It might be in your favor if there were the same number of criminals being measured. But there weren't. The non-Rso's made up 27 times the number of Rso's. Meaning one out of 16 sex offenders committed a new sex crime and one out of 68 non sex offender criminals did. And if we add Vanguard's calculation into the mix, there were only 1 out of over 3000 that were not any type of criminal at all.

If you want to make a difference pull your head out of the sand, acknowledge that there are seriously damaging crimes committed against people, and that your figures you're trying to pass off as FACT are not fact at all but a manipulation of statistics to try and make them say something they do not say. The Washington study does indeed say that 19% of all new sex crime convictions resulting in prison time the offender is already on the registry. The New York State study that the Reverend Hess child porn sex offender likes to reference also states a low recidivism rate over a limited amount of time. It also states quite clearly that 25% of the men in that study had a previous sex crime conviction prior to the most current offense that landed them in jail. Get your facts straight. You do not have facts. You do not have truth. Tom Madison is uninformed, and you're all acting like imbeciles.

Or, you could always stick with the same old story you've been using and continue to look like pissed off unrepentant victim bashing sex offenders who will LIE and LIE and LIE and are never to be trusted. I kinda think that's what you guys will do. None of you are smart enough to know you got it wrong, and even if you were, there's not a one of you that has the balls to stand up and say "Stitches is right guys, let's go back to the drawing board".

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

"a website which is currently being examined in connection with a law enforcement investigation into the sexual exploitation of children"

That was just one of the places that Michael McCormick aka Spike was posting images he said were his niece, made much easier with the use of his cell phone.

Michael claims to have had "consensual sex" with girls as young as 4 years old and sees absolutely nothing wrong with that. Over the years he's shared many of his "girl moments" or "GM's" as the pedofreaks call them. He believed GirlChat to be his "safe haven" on the internet, so much so that he has actually bragged about the multiple children he has molested. From his own family members, to his step-daughter, niece, adopted child, children of friends, neighbors, and virtually any child he could get his hands on.

I met Susie, she was 8 yrs old when I met her. Well, as you can imagine I was getting horny after about 8 months without sex and Susie was there, I did'nt rape her, in fact, I don't think she knew what I was doing at the time

just above my house, 3 little girls moved in. I only had a few mins alone with them for the few months that I was there. I did share one sexual experience with each girl, but the 6 yr old was my favorite, (the ages were 4,6,and 10 due to the nature of this board I will not post what happened)

GirlChat has known that he's a child molester, they routinely edit his comments. Does this disturb the "girl lovers"? Nah, they're ALL filthy pedophiles. They would defend it no matter what, by either saying the girl wanted it, or in the case of rape they would merely blame society and say Michael was forced to rape her because he wasn't allowed to legally molest children. THAT is how their thinking works.

One of the really interesting things though is the appearance of Mrs. Spike:

Hello everyone, I'm the wife to the person you all know as Spike, so I will call myself Mrs. Spike, I guess I will get him to register me here since he is a moderator, as I understand it. I knew that Spike was a child-lover or MAA is that the abbraviation that you all use, from the very beginning that I met him. I was but 17 yrs old when I met Spike for the first time, and I instantly fell in love with him. He's the most gentle, loving soul I have ever met, and I don't care if I am partial! Spike told me about his attraction about week and half ago, and I simply just smiled at him and told him that I knew. I could tell when he is with Megan that he loves her so much, I'm not jealous of that love, because he's got a special love for me all his own. I'm not afraid that he might molest a little-girl I don't believe that Spike would do that, he just simply has an attraction toward girls, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Mrs Spike

Was that really Mrs. McCormick speaking? Does that sound right to you? Besides Sosen chicks, do you know of ANY woman that would knowingly be with a filthy pedophile?

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Sex offender activists have their own way of manipulating statistics. They do not care that it's true or not. We've been through this many times and I honestly don't know why the brilliant minds among them haven't yet figured it out. Perhaps they're too busy calling us "ignorant" and blaming others for their own bad behavior. Blame Gaming.

This is the fact plain and simple. A DOJ recidivism report done over a period of 3 years is not an accurate reflection of true recidivism. Nor does the DOJ recidivism report address the percentage of new sex crimes committed by either an RSO or a non-RSO.

But the new Washington study does. Yes, not including sex offenses that only result in probation or other penalty, ONLY counting those that result in prison 19% of all NEW sex crimes are committed in Washington state by someone who is ALREADY on the registry.

Now let's listen to Karl Hanson himself explain about recidivism:

Let's let Tom explain how it really works shall we? And how to get people to care and be understanding and sympathetic and empathetic, considering how ignorant we all are I have a feeling it won't go over very well. But that's me.

Dr Gene Abel concluded from a study of over 16,000 men, that 95% of all child molestations are committed by pedophiles.

Gene G. Abel, M.D. is a full professor of Psychiatry who has taught at several medical schools, including Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. Dr. Abel is currently affiliated with Emory University School of Medicine and Morehouse School of Medicine.

Dr. Abel, who has been a research scientist in the field of sexual violence for more than 30 years, is at the top of his field, both nationally and internationally.

Ken Lanning said:

Most preferential child molesters spend their entire lives attempting to convince themselves and others that they are not perverts.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM - NOW!!!!Posted On Sunday, August 10, 2008 at 1:25:00 AM by ZMan!

STAND UP AND FIGHT - FOR YOUR FREEDOM

Imagine with 630,000 sex offenders, not including family, could do?

This is in the words of Zman, the radical, impulsive, brainless registered sex offender activist we've all come to know so well. Yes, folks, he's over on his blog attempting to incite violence. He's encouraging convicted child molesters to gang together and RISE UP against society.

I believe the impetus behind this rash act of his came from one of SoClear Media's newest pissed off sex offenders TMaximus. Listen:

Yes, indeed. Society has reached the breaking point. We're sick and tired of people thinking they can abuse our children and then whine and moan about the consequences. We're sick and tired of liberal wrist slapping judges who won't give an appropriate sentence for the molestation of a child. Yes, we need mandatory sentences. And for the most part, what we need is not residency restrictions or sex offender registries. I believe it is clear from the lack of intelligence and the rampant blame gaming arising from the sex offender community, that what we need is life imprisonment without possibility of parole.

To members of Absolute Zero United, its all fun and games to harass former offenders. Usually I'm all fun and games in taking it back to them. But not today. This is no fucking game. The label of "sex offender" has gotten so serious that people are willing to KILL in order to avoid the stigma. Any troll reading this better think long and hard about this article, because this is not a fucking game, but a matter of life and death

He then goes on to quote, in stupid RSO fashion, an entire news article. Let's sum it up for you.

The complaint tells a chilling story of a disaffected man who had thought about committing a random shooting for the past four or five years and prepared by stashing weapons in the woods.

"Johnson finally decided to execute his plan last week after suspecting that a woman he had recently sexually assaulted would tell her ordeal to police, the complaint said."

Johnson said he lured the woman near the bridge the evening before the shooting, sexually assaulted her and tried to talk her out of calling police. He decided to wait there and kill any law enforcers who arrived to investigate. When none did, he returned home.

He left his home the next day and when he returned, his mother told him police were looking for him. Expecting to go to jail and fearing the label of sex offender, he decided "he had nothing to lose and the only power he had in this life was `to take.'"

Now Derek, believes that when the man started shooting teenagers at random, the government is at fault for being "vigilantes" making laws that he doesn't agree with. This man had already been planning to do something like this for years, why in the world would Derek choose a psychopath to try to make his argument.......that isn't even a rational argument.....and will only do more harm to himself and "his people" than if he'd just kept his mouth shut to begin with. He's impulsive, which is probably why he's an RSO today. If he knew WHY this is an inappropriate tactic for a convicted child molester to use, then he would most likely have enough self-control to have not molested a child to begin with.

And yet the trolls over at Absolue Zero United think its all fun and games? You condemned someone for merely acknowledging the possibility it was inevitable? Well here is proof it is not only possible, not only inevitable, but a COLD HARD REALITY! Do you STILL think this all a fun game, Stitches?

You are quite mistaken Mr. Logue. This is no game. It has never been a game. Right now in this country there are an estimated 27,160,752 ADULT female survivors of child sexual abuse and 12,220,488 ADULT male survivors for a total of almost 40 million ADULT survivors. You want to call up your 630,000 and incite violence against those whose only desire is to protect children from predators? Bring it on, Derek. Bring it on. You aren't doing anything to create empathy to your cause, you are making it worse Derek. This is what people think about those who abuse children.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

"When I was younger it was actually easier for me being MAA. As I grow older I find it is much harder for me. I want what I want. And at this age I am used to getting what I want."

Bill Page aka Siva has been with GirlChat for the last eight years, he's been a consistent regular and a part of what was known as "The Jive Five"

Bill likes to draw attention to himself with constant descriptions of his exploits with nude little girls......... including his own granddaughter.

He claims to take showers with them.

He claims they sleep in his bed with him.

According to Bill little girls strangely just strip naked around him. He has that effect on them he says. - laughing. Which is another peculiar and obnoxious habit of his that all Anti's will recognize immediately. - laughing.

Bill claims to have been married for 30 years and to have a long term mistress who knows of his filthy pedophilia. He also speaks frequently of all the little girls who sleep in his bed. I wonder where the wife is?

Or is Bill Page a liar? Has he completely made up 8 years of pedophilefantasy? Well, you know that's what all filthy pedophiles say whenthey're exposed. - laughing. What kind of person do you suppose would say this?

I often am with naked little girls and so I give them wide latitude as to how they act...I have up to 6 girls at the house at a time and we share MANY situations including what some would conceive as being sexual.

Bill Page is a filthy pedophile who has spent at least the last eight years saying things like this, perving on children, drooling over children, taking advantage of the innocence of childhood. He's a long time member of GirlChat, a haven for child exploitation, and the encouragement of young pedophiles who will eventually ruin the lives of children, not to mention their own. Someone like KissbyAlice for example who will never get the help he so desperately needs as long as the filth that is GirlChat is enabling the cognitive distortions and disordered thinking that allow these people like Bill Page to continue this type of behavior.

We are pedophiles so we have been forged like steel in fire and adversity. I revel in being a ped. I would have it no other way. When they finally make all this legal I am the one who will not know what to do. I am going to be the throwback, the dinosaur. There will come a day and I wish it so when I will come to a forum and people will feel pity for me since I wish to hide who I am.

Yes, I imagine he does wish to hide who he is. And perhaps the things he has said about children he's been trusted to be around. Like

she looked suddenly serious: "Pepere, I love you so much." What a declaration of trust and love. She held out her arms to be picked up and I scooped her into my arms and held her tight to me. She laid her head against my chest and I just held her lovingly while hot water streamed over us and we breathed in the steam from the room.

Visit Wikisposure to read the rest of the story of Bill Page aka Siva. And I will remind you of Bill's statements:

my affidavit, to the antis

To the antis this is what I offer you: Nothing.

Every day of my life you antis do things which I do not agree with and yet you ask me to assure you I will not do something of which you do not approve? I don't think so.

I offer you no comfort, no assurances, no promises.

These are fucking cowards who hide behind anonymity while making accusations and trying to be bad ass. Set the time and place bad ass. I will come and you best give your soul to God because your ass will belong to me.

David aka ddlibnkc was a member of BoyMoment, home of some of the filthiest of the filthy. Men preying on boys, little boys, and sharing tips, confessions and photos.

David Liberty is a repeat sex offender.

According to court documents, Liberty was previously arrested in September 2001 for possession of child pornography. At the time of his arrest, Liberty was wearing a diaper. A search of his vehicle revealed four photographs of children with their genitals exposed, rope, bailing twine, scissors, a GI Joe doll, a Polaroid camera, and three pairs of women’s underwear. Liberty pled guilty to two counts of possession of child pornography in August 2002 and ultimately spent 180 days in the Platte County Jail.

Court documents also indicate that Liberty had once been detained by Kansas City police for running on a jogging track near Plaza Middle School in Platte County, wearing only a diaper and shoes.

Now David is once again charged with possessing and distributing child pornography. Many of the boys in the images David had were bound. These are not "child modeling" photos we're talking about here. And the really scary thing is that he was a construction worker, going out into neighborhoods and watching children play, photographing them, sometimes molesting them ........then telling the other filthy pedophiles about it. It is believed that his own mother was aware of his behavior. I'll ask you this question........what would you do? If you knew your son had a problem like this, and you knew he had young boys he took to his room. What would you do?

If you visit Wikisposure you can see some of the things David has said. But be warned, Reader discretion is advised.

Regarding some of the images he had stored online, please pay particular attention to this

While we do not generally wish to post images of children on this site, we do believe that some of these children may be victims and urge the public to view the video below in an effort to identify these children.

You may also contact the Western Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force Tip Line at 816-858-1922.

Silence and the desire to 'not get involved' are things a pedophile needs in order to continue his exploitation of children. For a victim, silence is also one of the biggest deterrents to healing. According to the APA, family support, extra-familial support, high self-esteem, and spirituality are factors that help in recovery.

One of the strongest predictors of the child's recovery from the abuse experience is a high level of maternal and family functioning. (This, of course, assumes that the abuser was not a member of the immediate family or, if so, is not still living within the family.)

So, I repeat my question. What would you do if you knew your son were molesting children?

Pidel pleaded guilty on June 15, 2004, and admitted that he took sexually explicit images of a nine-year-old boy between 1999 and 2003 and that he had engaged in oral sex with the child. Pidel also subscribed to an Internet site that contained images of male minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

This wasn't the first time Pidel had been caught abusing children, in the military, he was convicted of sexual assault charges involving a minor; he was dishonorably discharged from the Air Force in 1994 and spent three years in prison.

At first, after jail, I stayed away from boys as much as I could, hoping it would prevent them from getting harmed, feeling that if I did befriend them that I would risk the past happening again and them being harmed in the process, like before.

In 2004, ICE began investigating Pidel's involvement in a website with images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Once charged, he was ordered to have no unsupervised contact with minors, undergo a mental health examination and register as a sex offender. In 2005, he was convicted of producing and receiving child pornography and being a felon in possession of a firearm.

About

A community of individuals pledged to fight paedophiles on the web. We are committed to the safety and emotional well-being of all children. This site will serve as a resource for those committed to our fight wherever you may be in the world.