Side view of Venice Median project that is proposed for the area between North and South Venice Blvd, Pacific and Dell.

By Becky Dennison, director of Venice Community Housing

Venice Community Housing, Hollywood Community Housing Corporation and Eric Owen Moss Architects look forward to helping alleviate the City’s housing and homelessness crisis, as well as promoting the arts and adding other benefits to the Venice community, through a well-designed and well-managed affordable and permanent supportive housing community on the parking lots at Venice-Dell-Pacific.

We are working to incorporate community feedback into the preliminary design proposals, moving closer to final designs, and preparing other documents for the City’s approval process. There are no large community engagement events scheduled for August and September, however, we are attending smaller events upon invitation. Please reach out any time to venicedellpacific@vchcorp.org to invite representatives of our team to discuss the project, timeline, or other related issues.

If you are new to this list, please visit VCH’s website at www.vchcorp.org for background information on this site and proposed project, as well as previous Q&A.

Correcting Errors and Clarifying Plans

The Venice-Dell-Pacific team recommends that people join this email list and/or visit www.vchcorp.org to access up to date and accurate information about our plans for the site. All information distributed by our team will have our names and contact information on it. In response to many people inquiring about recent information being distributed via flyers and websites without contact information, one purpose of this email is to respond to some misinformation about the site and our plans. Please reach out to us anytime for updated information, or to clarify other information received.

Zoning/HeightMisinformation: A height of 45 feet will be allowed due to planned commercial uses.

Clarification: It is likely that we will be applying for RAS3 zoning to accommodate for non-residential uses such as community arts space and micro-enterprise/small scale retail. However, height limits specified in the Venice Specific Plan apply regardless of zoning designation, and are limited to a maximum of 35 feet for this site.

Setbacks and DensityMisinformation: The property is being designed without setbacks from the sidewalk and to maximize density.

Clarification: The current design approach provides a range of setbacks, with a minimum of a five foot setback provided around the perimeter of the site. A 15 foot setback is proposed along the canal and a number of areas on the ground level are intermittently deepened to be up to 30 feet from the property line. The current design approach also includes a varied roofline, with heights ranging from 25 to 35 feet. This approach meets or exceeds all setback requirements and height limits in the Venice Specific Plan, and therefore does not maximize density.

Design/Final RenderingsMisinformation: The designs/visuals presented at prior public meetings are final, and represent what the project will look like.

Clarification: We do not yet have a final design or final renderings. Early-stage project massings, which show a general shape and size of a building without details, were shared for conversational and community input purposes at a workshop in July. Photos of those preliminary drawings have been shared by others as if they are actual project designs or renderings, and they are not. More detailed designs will be included in the application for City approvals, and the designs may continue to evolve throughout the approval process.

Number of Units and PeopleMisinformation: The proposed project will house 500 people.

Clarification: The current proposal includes 140 units, a combination of studios (including artist lofts), one bedrooms and two bedrooms. The exact combination of unit sizes has yet to be finalized, but using best estimates and VCH’s current occupancy rates, including the reality that most formerly homeless individuals live alone, the estimated number of people that will likely be housed at the site is about 250 – 275. Even if every unit, as currently configured, had the maximum number of occupants, the maximum total residents would be 420. Neither HCHC nor VCH has experienced any building maximizing its occupancy, and don’t expect that at Venice-Dell-Pacific.

Project CostMisinformation: The cost per unit will be $700,000, including land costs.

Current Status: The City is retaining ownership of this land, preserving the current parking use, and adding value to the land by including other uses including the urgent Citywide need for affordable housing. Therefore, estimates being circulated of “$700,000 including land value” are inaccurate, as there is no transfer or sale of the land. In our application to the City, we estimated total development costs (including construction, permits and fees, necessary consultants, required building reserves, and other costs) at $340,000. We will release updated estimates as plans and financing are closer to finalized. The average cost of building permanent supportive housing in the City of Los Angeles is between $350,000 and $400,000 per unit, but the savings in public funds associated with providing long-term housing to homeless people far outweighs the upfront cost.

Non-Profit Affordable Housing DevelopmentMisinformation: The development team includes corporations that stand to profit from the project and/or can sell the buildings at market rate.

Clarification: Both Venice Community Housing Corporation and Hollywood Community Housing Corporation are non-profit affordable housing developers, and in accordance with our respective articles of incorporation, we are obligated to irrevocably dedicate this property, and all of our properties and funds, to charitable and public purposes. The buildings on this site will be required to be used as affordable housing for at least 55 years.

Environmental and Traffic AnalysisCurrent Status: An Environmental Impact Report, including traffic analysis, will be completed for this project. It is not complete now, because it is related to the final project proposal and will take about 12 months to complete both the study and the public approvals of the report. The reports are public documents, and require public hearings and City approval. Updates on the progress and public input opportunities will be announced on this email list.

Recently Submitted Q&A

Questions and other input can be submitted to venicedellpacific@vchcorp.org. Will units for people with disabilities be included at this site?

Yes. At a minimum, we will provide a specific number of units that are fully accessible, along with accessible common areas, as required by law. We are also likely to use funding for development and/or rental subsidies that further target and/or prioritize people with disabilities, such as the new No Place Like Home state funds, the County’s Housing for Health program, and others. However, we are not yet at the point of financing the project, so the specifics of the populations to be served aren’t yet known. We will keep people updated as we go through the process, but it is certain that people with disabilities will be served by this project.

Will the City have public hearings to discuss what goes into the Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA)?

In our experience, the City generally does not hold public hearings to inform the content of a DDA in advance of drafting. However, there is a public approval process for any DDA, which includes public testimony.

Your website states that an application to develop the site will be submitted to the City in September. Does this mean all public input on design and other related work is over? Does this mean that at this time we will know what the project is going to look like, number of units, square footage, etc.? Does it make sense to apply to develop the site now if the development agreement has not been approved yet?

The project approvals will likely take 12 – 14 months, and there are a lot of public hearings and other interactions during that time so public input on design and other related work does not end when the application is submitted. The application will include our proposal details, and is a public document and will be made available. Lastly, it does make sense to start the process prior to approval of a development agreement, as the development agreement is just one part of the overall approval process. We need to go through the development process concurrently – not all of the steps happen sequentially.

Comments (7)

Adding public housing density to an extremely crowded neighborhood which has no LA metro access is a very bad idea… No one thinks this will reduce the number of people on the street. This will just rob a beach neighborhood of parking and satisfy politician’s egos… The money should be used to provide more housing in a non-coastal neighborhood where land is not so expensive… Venice needs public investment, but it does not need this project in the least… Upgrade the library, create a Venice museum, but no not create a public housing project at great expense in a rich neighborhood, sweeten it with art goodies and pretend it will do anything to fight homelessness… It won’t and is a total waste of money and giveaway to fat-cat special interest “do gooders”…

This housing should be in another area where there are less people and traffic. it’s too expensive here and will attract more homeless. Palmdale is a better idea. the housing needs to be in an area where the land is cheaper, so building costs are less. I object to this project. Please verify you have received my protest.

This project is really big, stupid, and unnecessary in this location. Is there any news about the old DWP service yard over on Thatcher, south of Washington? Who is building that and how big and stupid will that be? How much of this sort of stuff will they be building west of Lincoln? The area is already seriously crowded.

The whole thing is a continuation of the transfer of taxpayer’s money to these larger and politically well-placed nonprofit organizations that usually consume most of the money in paying administrator’s salaries and “overhead” – Wonder why that same money could not be spent better somewhere else on a less stylish and elaborate construction with more green space and not integrated into a parking structure, that could serve two or three times the people in need? What we have here is either social engineering at its finest, or underneath it all, a “screw the rich” response to the people who are presently paying the big bucks to live here. This money transfer has been going on for decades but this is the most ambitious project ever proposed – Thanks Mike!

The electorate here in L.A. voted themselves a new tax that was to house people who are currently homeleess. Anything other than that (artist’s lofts, “affordable” housing, retail shops, “community” rooms) would be a misue of those funds. And 700,000 a unit seems like an awful lot of money for one unit. If somebody were to do some digging I bet they would find the same thing the State Attorney in Florida found when he investigated a developer there who builds a large part of the homeless and affordable housing in that state. And what he found was evidence of a whole lot of kickbacks going on, enough to warrant indicting the developer for fraud.

Recent Comments

Rick Swinger { Listen Up! Pollution effects Everybody! Thats includes you Billy and me and the homeless etc. We are all in the same boat here. You don't have to have a degree in Biology to understand thats Rats have killed more people than any other rodent and we have lots of them... } – 2405 9:25 AM

Billy Bathgate { NIMBY is too polite a term for the likes of arrogant pretentious jerks like you. In fact there is no word for the likes of people like you that wouldn't be censored by the owner of this site so I'll just have to save it for if we ever meet... } – 2405 6:49 AM

{ Bonin was elected by the very people who live in other areas of CD 11 and who benefit by placing ALL of the adversity in Venice. That said, had Bonin proposed this "Home of the homeless" BS (as well as the stupid "road diet" during his re-election campaign, the people... } – 2305 10:03 AM

Billy Bathgate { Elections have consequences Kip. Your homeless hating candidate for City Council didn't win. And the people of Los Angeles voted to pony up and do something about getting the homeless of L.A. off the sidewalks and into housing. Now would be a good time for your side to shut up.... } – 2205 7:49 PM

Nick Antonicello { The only way to get out of the bureaucratic clutches of LA, Garcetti and Bonin is to support cityhood for Venice. Our own Mayor and Council directly elected by Venetians with a land use body with teeth that can restrict such impositions by the far larger LA. Does Garcetti or... } – 2205 11:36 AM

Billy Bathgate { Nothing wrong with me but there is definitely something wrong with all of you who do nothing but complain 24/7 about the homeless and then oppose every move to get them housed so they won't be homeless anymore. Iflily white Brentwood or Pacific Palisades is your idea of an ideal... } – 2105 3:20 PM

{ Billy, poor is poor - These folks are drunk, drugged and/or crazy. That is what makes them "poor." Once again, anyone who opposes the crap that is going on in Venice either hates the "poor" or is a "racist" for not wanting a dangerous and possibly contagious population of "travelers"... } – 2105 1:31 PM

Will { I think you said everything. Thanks for your support. } – 2105 1:08 PM

Publius { not gonna read your press release for yourself Hawkins; it's a calculated distraction, responds to nothing; you've intentionally missed opportunities to observe what others have now had to multiply document, and that documentation is as stunning as your WILLful (ignorance) Hawkins. You and do not merit a response to your... } – 2105 11:51 AM

Will { One cannot compare the work done by a faith-based group working full time with city funds with a bunch of elected volunteers working part time with community donations. The work done by the Venice Homeless Committee is unprecedented and has gone well beyond its duties to this community in housing... } – 2105 9:57 AM

{ I LOVE that they posted them. But these homeless folks will ignore them UNLESS they get arrested on a daily basis. LAPD needs to assert their power. Its a psychological game that the neighborhood and LAPD are starting to WIN against the homeless and their hypocritical "advocates" that don't live... } – 2105 9:21 AM