My only goal, honestly is to share working e17s. If they let me upload SID, that's it for me. Being honest It's damn difficult to find a live SID much less one with e17 and much more less with a functional Remastersys.

If I can't I'll try to upload it somewhere else.

64 bit if lucky might be up by midnight. Connection is better today.

Best wishes,
Xeta

P.S. If it does go up and you are interested- I'll post a new post about it- Read the READ ME file or else )

P.P.S wrote Sourceforge again and hope to know what they say.

P.P.P.S They just gave me the go ahead Yay!

xetaprime

Post subject:Posted: 08.06.2011, 22:49

Joined: 2011-06-04
Posts: 81

Status: Offline

@sx9

Quote:

I sometimes use http://www.filehosting.org/ for uploading iso's for internal development tests.
But you can use it for public use, too.

Looks interesting, thanx!

dpt

Post subject:Posted: 09.06.2011, 04:52

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 281
Location: New Delhi
Status: Offline

xetaprime wrote:

@sx9

Quote:

I sometimes use http://www.filehosting.org/ for uploading iso's for internal development tests.
But you can use it for public use, too.

Looks interesting, thanx!

Looks very interesting to me.
No restrictions. Nothing to install.

dpt

_________________In a lunatic asylum, everyone thinks that he is the doctor.

xetaprime

Post subject:Posted: 09.06.2011, 11:58

Joined: 2011-06-04
Posts: 81

Status: Offline

It's up in case anyone wants to explore! I wrote a separate post about it but it was removed :0

You can find the link in my original post (page 1). Hope it works for you. Update: No, you can't. Link was removed

Best, Xeta

p.s. I hope to work on the 32 bit today.

Last edited by xetaprime on 09.06.2011, 16:38; edited 2 times in total

drb

Post subject:Posted: 09.06.2011, 12:12

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 96

Status: Offline

Probably not as your other post is more ferocious than a dragon

xetaprime

Post subject:Posted: 09.06.2011, 12:31

Joined: 2011-06-04
Posts: 81

Status: Offline

You mean, was

I just thought if anyone was interested they wouldn't have to look through 2 pages(present) of posts. But that's okay Bartender!

I didn't start out to do this. I'm sorry. But I'm not sure I understand why not?

Before reading this/your latest post I asked in my first post if I could say- google the name? Is this wrong also? If so I'll remove it. Can I direct people at least to the remastersys website?

I didn't think any of this would be a problem.

Best,
Xeta

P.S. I want to add I will comply with your wishes- if I can't even mention the name.

I know people want a way to remaster Aptosid. Honestly I tried figuring out Pyfill first but didn't know where to start. If Aptosid had a way easily to remaster I would be writing only about installing a current e17. And offering this iso to people saves them all the hassle I went through. I love Linux. I love the choices we have and I again say I didn't mean to step on anyone's toes. This was never my intention. But I am surprised this is a problem. I'm just speaking honestly.

devil

Post subject:Posted: 09.06.2011, 15:39

Joined: 2010-08-26
Posts: 491
Location: Berlin
Status: Offline

dont apologise. some people here are very restrictive.
pyfll is probably not harder than remastersys, looking at the probs you had, and its much cleaner.
so maybe you want to look into that again.

greeetz
devil

se7en

Post subject:Posted: 09.06.2011, 16:29

Joined: 2010-09-11
Posts: 164

Status: Offline

Well I would also like to know why it is not allowed to post about remastering here.
You made clear that you will not support him or problems that rise using his remaster. But how can sharing information that others might be interested in be not allowed here?

There was a bit of a tweak getting Remastersys in but a lot was my own human error- like not checking for gdm or dnsmasq. With a bit more effort I could probably figure out why grub isn't installing but with 'Restore Grub' right there I don't see it as a problem, ehh big problem?