Point to any link below for more information. Note that the text of Priscian below is that of Hertz’s edition, and that of the St Gall manuscript may differ. The gloss you selected is highlighted in yellow. (See introduction for further notes.)

virgo: .i. sed ⁊ masculinum invenitur ut hieronymus inconflictucontra helvidium ostendit dicens virginali coniugio virgo .i. christus filius nasciretur.- ⁊ níbbu machdad tra bed figurate no·mbed .a. virgo filius as·beir hieronymus .i. conná·sásad nechtar de in n-araill reliqua{cf. E 41v18 m.l. sed invenitur masculinum ut hironymus in conflictu eius helvidium ut virginali coniugio virgo filius nasceretur}[‘i.e. but the masculine is also found, as Jerome shows in his conflict with Helvidius, when he says: ‘so that the Chaste Son, i.e. Christ, could be born from a chaste marriage’. And it were no wonder then that the ‘Virgo Filius’ (Chaste Son) that Jerome speaks of was a combination of two words in apposition, i.e. so that one of the two should not interfere with the other, etc.’][analysis]