Lucky for me my friend Paul Friedman at LensProToGo.com loaned me this awesome lens right after it was released, so I got a chance to check it out before most people even knew it was on the market. Unfortunately for Paul though, my busy schedule has kept me from completing my review of this lens until now, so I apologize to Paul for such a long delay.

Old versus the New

Using a tripod and my 5D Mark II I simply took the same image from the same spot with both lenses. The camera settings were identical – a 2.5 sec exposure at f/5.6 using ISO 100. The image you see below was taken with the new 100mm f/2.8L lens and if you hover over it you’ll see the image taken with the older 100mm f/2.8 lens. To my eyes the image quality was about the same, and that was consistent with what I saw with several other even more boring images I experimented with. The net result is that from a sharpness standpoint they are about the same, but the newer lens seems to be a tad brighter with less distortion.

After experimenting with this lens for a week my conclusion that sharpness isn’t the reason to upgrade. The major benefit to upgrading is a seemingly faster AF performance (not by much though), the addition of image stabilization (this is big – especially when paired with a 7D or newer), and the overall improvement on brightness and distortion.

I could never do this review as good as my friends at The Digital Picture, so for a more exhaustive comparison I encourage you to read their review (but please come back).

Sample Shots

All of the following shots were taken handheld on camera bodies not designed to maximize the advantage of the hybrid IS system, so only traditional IS functionality applies. In addition, these are the RAW images that had default processing from Adobe Lightroom 3.0 (Final Release) with no additional post-processing.

You will notice that the Porsche crest below is very sharp despite being handheld at 1/30 sec at a very awkward angle. Click any image to view a larger version.

As you can see from the images here, this is a VERY sharp lens with a great image stabilization and auto focus system. While my composition may leave a lot to be desired, the quality of images you get from this glass worth every penny!

Conclusion

This was a great rental experience from end to end. The lens that arrived was brand new in a new Pelican case. The service from LensProToGo.com was excellent, and despite my losing the return packing slip – a new one was issued quickly (and I even got to keep the lens for an extra free day while I waited!). In short, this was a much better rental experience than I had the first time and I’m told by my readers more closely represents what they have experienced from them in the past. I strongly encourage you to give LensProToGo.com a try the next time you are renting a lens.

Special Offer

LensProToGo.com has been gracious enough to offer you a 5% discount off any order when you enter the coupon code MART5as shown above in yellow.

Save $65 off the MSRP of this lens from Adorama

Adorama is currently offering the Canon 100mm f/2.8L Hybrid IS USM Macro lens at $65 off its normal retail price (this offer will expire) as well as 6 months same as cash financing. If you are like me and already own the 100mm macro then now is the time to buy it while it is on sale with the great finance offer and then sell your old lens to pay off half of the cost of this new one.

Disclosure

LensProToGo.com loaned this lens to me at no charge under no obligation. If you enjoyed this article, I encourage you to do business with them using the code shown as a token of appreciation.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity