The Double Dazzle collection hit counters on April 30, but since most of the shades are permanent, I think we can still talk about them.

Dazzleglasses are MAC’s sparkliest lipglosses. They first appeared in May of 2008, in a collection called Dazzleglass, then had a cameo in 2008′s Red She Said holiday collection. They’re $18 each and have brush wands (and the classic MAC vanilla scent).

I’ve heard a few people comparing the Dazzleglasses to Chanel’s most recent crop of “celestial” glossimers; I think the comparison is misplaced. The Dazzleglasses are mostly sheer, and as we saw yesterday, those glossimers have really pigmented bases — they feel to me like pretty different products.

10 Responses to “MAC Dazzleglass”

>I’ve only tried a couple of the Dazzleglasses and I haven’t purchased any of them because I quite honestly don’t see what all the fuss is about. I don’t think they’re any better than the lipglasses and they might even be slightly worse in my eyes. My main complaint would be the watery texture, I guess. Maybe I’m crazy, but for now I won’t be getting any.

>I’d never been very interested in MAC lipglosses as I have a million ones that are much cheaper and fine for my day to day wear.

Then I was convinced by one of the SAs to try babysparks. What can I say? I was sold. I tried a lot of the other pink dazzleglasses – Like venus, Sugarrrimed.. but I kept coming back to babysparks.

I love the fact that they all look shiny and wet without being sticky at all and that they have a brush applicator so if you’re wearing a sheer lipstick, it doesn’t wipe the previous colour off when putting on the product.

I can understand why they’re not to everyone’s taste as they are very sparkly, but for a night out or a date, these would be divine.