Do I Want Poor People To Die?

Chris | InformationLiberationSome people are going insane because they think I said welfare should be banned because people may use the money to murder people. Let's look at what I actually said:

All over TV they're saying we need to ban guns as they enabled his attack, but where are the calls to ban welfare which enabled him to buy his guns?

I was pointing out the hypocrisy of advocating guns be banned because they "enabled" his attack, while ignoring that fact taxpayer money forcibly redistributed to the shooter enabled him to buy the guns. I was not calling for welfare to be banned, I was pointing out hypocrisy. There is a difference.

That said, I am against "welfare" (which should more accurately be called "slave management to prevent revolt") because it's a criminal act to steal from someone and give it to someone else (after "administrative fees," of course), no matter how "just" your cause. I'm against welfare not because I want poor people to die, but because I think stealing is wrong, even if it's "voted" on by a democratic mob.

I believe the poor would be helped better through having freedom and free markets, rather than simply stealing everything the "rich" and middle class have as part of a "great leap forward." They tried that in communist China, it ended with 50,000,000 people dead. If you forcibly stole everything from everyone and redistributed it evenly to everyone, according to my own calculation, each person would only have some $8,000 total in assets. In such a situation, no one would have any wealth, and there would be nothing to buy, because no one would have the capital to mass produce goods at low cost, everyone would be forced to "fend for themselves" and live off scraps. Does that sound like utopia to you? It doesn't to me.

I want everyone to be rich, forced wealth redistribution could be described as a scam to ensure the rich don't have to face competition from the poor, poor people are bought off and given handouts so they'll become dependent slaves rather than self-empowered independent individuals who guide the course of their own lives (and challenge the status quo). I want people to be allowed to create their own world and not be robbed of everything they own by the state. Even poor people pay 40% on average in taxes. Why can't everyone be allowed to have more, rather than only some people get more by stealing it from someone who gets less? Enshrining crime into the law doesn't produce a "fair" society, it produces a society where some people are rulers and everyone else is slaves.
_
Chris runs the website InformationLiberation.com, you can read more of his writings here. Follow infolib on twitter here.

"Why Does No One Care The Government Financed The Dark Knight Shooter's Attacks? "

you really needed to write a whole article to back up your lies? you couldnt just make your point in the thread?

what a princess.. i wasnt calling for guns to be banned.. i was saying its stupid to allow psychos access to fully automatic rifles, but thats not calling for a ban.

do you drive a car? do you like driving on roads, you ever visited a library? computers your using now, the electricity.. probably a lot of the food you eat..

id suggest public money has made contributions to all that.

why dont you go to somalia.. implement your utopia over there..
the fact is you were trying to link your view of an utopian free market society - and how evil the government is - to this mass murder.. its transparent - its stupid - and you were somehow suggesting that the only way this was able to occur was because the shooter was on welfare..

wheres the outrage! why does noone care!!???

well noone cares dipshit because theres a few things that are more important that you continually rantanting about how bad the government is..

and thats all.. you just continually bitch that its not your utopia..
well just bitching about bullshit like why does noone care he was on welfare.. the government literally bought his guns..

go to somalia.. if its that bad here, go! otherwise.. youre simply being a hypocrite

...well, not really. But, the are a magnet to this type of behavior. Why didn't James Holmes come to a theatre in my state and try that? I'll tell you why: because on of my fellow citizens would have dropped him like a sack of feed off the back of a pickup truck!

So, all you gun banners our there you will be pleased to know that you're less safe and more prone to getting shot up in a state or city where guns are banned. Just look at the two cities that have the stictests gun control: Chicago and New York. Guess which two cities in the USA also have THE MOST GUN VIOLENCE? Bingo! Facts don't lie but anti-gun politicians do!

What about his $26,000.00 grant provided by the Univ of Colorado? He was among 6 elite neuroscience students chosen to recieve the award.

Among the "conspiracy" pages thus far, not one mention of Scopolamine or "Devils breath". I wonder if the police tested him (the joker) for narcotics. This implies that he may have been drugged and influenced by third parties.

Chris, I think the royal libertarianism and pehaps anarcho-capitalism (sounds cool) you've been absorbing is wearing thin. Ron Paul and Mises and the like promote an end game to neo-feudalism by means of a gold standard. The gold standard will hurt the working man, especially since we have seen an unprecedented transfer of weath in the last century. You will find the answers for the systemic injustice being perpetrated on humanity in classical libertarianism or Georgism. Check out libertyrevival.com for some info on the subject and get focused back on your work, stop arguing with internet trolls about welfare. The biggest welfare abusers are corporations, charity is a mask for systemic injustice.

common Welfare recipients are invisible to everyone but those whom have had that money taken in the form of socialism.
they dont work
they dont pay taxes
they dont vote
they cant afford to buy your products that you make, unless you are part of SNAP program.

they really really suck. they are basicly DEAD.
so if anyone gets upset about that--they obviously know its true.

Other wise, why would they be mad?

And last I checked--it was a free internet. OP can say anything he/she wants- YOU DONT HAVE TO LIKE IT!

Who cares. None of this means anything. All a huge waste of what we call time. Written to evoke emotion and responses. So predictable it is pathetic. I should have jammed a dull knife in my skull rather than post a comment.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.