Sunday, February 4, 2018

Pakistan Bestows New Concerns Upon The World

Last October Pakistani forces freed a Canadian-American family held captive by militants, they also captured one of the
abductors. Caitlan Coleman, an American, and her Canadian husband, Joshua Boyle, and their children were freed in an October raid after five years in captivity. Pakistani troops confronted Haqqani militants as they ferried the family across the tribal lands of northwest Pakistan. At the time United States officials saw a potential windfall in that the abductor was a
member of the Taliban-linked Haqqani network who could perhaps provide
valuable information about at least one other American hostage. When
America demanded access to the man Pakistani officials rejected
those requests elevating the event to another troublesome disagreement in the increasingly
dysfunctional relationship between the countries.

Many Americans Question If The Money Was Wasted

The United States has provided Pakistan more than $33 billion in aid since 2002, Just before Christmas Vice President Mike Pence reinforced the message of Americas's displeasure in a visit to Afghanistan when he told cheering American troops that “President
Trump has put Pakistan on notice.” The reaction of his audience was
notable since the Pentagon has historically been one of
Pakistan’s defenders in Washington because of its longstanding ties to
the Pakistani military. Afghan
officials have pleaded with three American presidents to suspend
nearly all security aid to Pakistan, an across-the-board freeze that would stop giving money billions to Pakistan, which is guilty of harboring the leaders of a Taliban insurgency that
the United States has struggled to defeat.

President Trump's recent action to halt almost all security aid to Pakistan suggests that his administration is carrying out the hard-line approach
that he outlined in August. Trump's accusation that Pakistan has “given us nothing but lies and deceit”
is driving this stand. The State Department has confirmed
the suspension of security assistance including “coalition support
funding,” which reimburses Pakistan for counterterrorism operations, and
the Foreign Military Financing program, which pays for purchases of
American military hardware, services, and training. Regardless of any knee-jerk reaction, it is important to remember the reason Pakistan is so important is that both it, and India it's neighbor to the south, possess nuclear weapons and that Pakistan is politically unstable.

For now, the halt in aid is said to be "temporary" and affects about $1.3 billion worth of annual aid. The decision came three days after President Trump complainedon Twitterabout Pakistan’s refusal to crack down on terrorist networks operating there. All this underlines how swiftly relations with Pakistan have deteriorated
since Mr. Trump took office and highlights several previous rifts
between the countries over Pakistan’s role as a sanctuary for extremist
groups which has poisoned Islamabad’s relations with Washington
since the terrorist attacks of September 2001. Interestingly it was noted that the joy this move created in
Afghanistan quickly turned to worry about how it might affect the rather
complex war
that has pushed the Afghan government to the brink.

China's "One Belt One Road" Initiative Includes Pakistan

What is happening in Pakistan and that troubled part of the world should concern America. This includes rising tensions and military clashes in the Kashmir border region that have resulted in the death of soldiers from both Pakistan and India, this has dashed any faint hopes that the two estranged nations could soon
normalize relations. Pakistan has also been experiencing a great deal of political turmoil following Pakistan’s Supreme Court removing Nawaz Sharif as prime minister last year for corruption allegations flowing from information that surfaced in the Panama Papers. Also, all indications are that Pakistan is turning hard towards Beijing and developing more ties with China as it pushes forward on its "One Belt One Road" initiative. Last but not least, top this off with Pakistan’s defense minister announcing that Islamabad will begin
purchasing more weapons from China, Russia, and other Eastern European
countries.

A great deal of this is mixed in the weird and tumultuous politics of Pakistan which in many ways has made the country unstable. For example, near the end of November newly freed Pakistani Islamist Hafiz Saeed, accused of
masterminding the 2008 assault in the Indian city of Mumbai, called on
Friday ousted former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif a 'traitor' for seeking
peace with their neighbor and arch-foe India. Saeed has a USD 10 million U.S. bounty on his head over the
Mumbai attack, spoke at Friday prayers after being freed earlier in the
day from 11 months of house arrest by a court that said there was no
evidence to hold him. Saeed was placed under house arrest while Sharif was still
prime minister, a move that drew praise from India, long furious at
Saeed`s freedom in Pakistan. Yes, a great deal of Pakistani politics seems to revolve around its difficult relationship with India.

This sort of thing is whyGlobalSecurity.org states that Pakistan's political system is broken: its political parties are
ineffective, functioning for decades as instruments of two families, the
Bhuttos and the Sharifs, two clans, both corrupt. Voting in Pakistan is
intensely personal, with parties gathering votes primarily through
allegiance to an individual candidate who is either feudal or has a
proven ability to deliver services. Clearly, they have a point, here is a little background concerning the ouster of Sharif who has been ousted before. Sharif's
government was dismissed over suspicions of corruption in 1993 by
former president Ghulam Ishaq Khan and the military. He was elected
again in 1997 but was overthrown in a coup two years later by the military that claimed he had tried to interfere with the armed forces.

Sharif
is the second world leader to be deposed by revelations in the
Panama Papers that exposed corruption and hidden wealth. Sharif was
re-elected in 2013, and his removal with a year to go in his third term continues a tradition. No prime minister has ever completed a five-year
term in Pakistan since it became a parliamentary democracy in 1971. Pakistan is known for its multiple coups and has been ruled by the military
for much of its existence since its independence from Britain in 1947. Attorney General Ashtar Ausaf Ali said Sharif was
"disqualified for life," although the court did not explicitly ban him
from running again. Pakistan is not due to hold elections until next
year.

In August of 2017, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi was sworn in as prime minister of Pakistan in an oath-taking ceremony. Abbasi
was elected prime minister by lawmakers in the National Assembly
earlier in the day to become the successor to the ousted prime
minister until a 'permanent' replacement is elected. Abbasi is expected to be replaced by Shahbaz Sharif, who is likely to compete for the
National Assembly seat lying vacant following the ouster of his elder
brother and then stand for the chief executive's office. during his acceptance speech, Abbasi said, "I am grateful to the people of Pakistan, and I am grateful to the 'people's prime minister', Nawaz Sharif," he continued. "I am also grateful to the opposition and Imran Khan for remembering us in their daily slandering," he jibed.

Sharif Addressing A Gathering In Haripur, January 2018

This means the former prime minister
is already out there bashing his opposition and commenting on the events impacting the country. Following the dust-up with America, he urged Prime
Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi to devise a strategy to make the country
self-sufficient and independent of the need for US aid. Sharif described as "disappointing" U.S. President Donald Trump`s
accusation that Pakistan was granting "safe haven" to militants
Washington was hunting in Afghanistan. "Pakistan has been involved in somebody else`s war for over 17 years.
The country has suffered the brunt of the damage the world has seen
since 9/11," Sharif said.
In January while addressing a gathering in Haripur, Sharif repeated his sharp
criticism of the judiciary and attacked Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)
Chairman Imran Khan.

Referring to the PAT-led protest on Lahore’s Mall Road three days
ago, Sharif questioned the stances of the leaders who joined the
protest. “Those who used to hurl shoes at each other are now standing in
the same line, which raises the question where their principled
politics is,” he went on to say “I was disqualified but the people rejected the
decision. The proponent of ‘the new Pakistan’ has given nothing but the
politics of deceit and allegations.” The three-time prime minister claimed that his rally in Haripur was
10 times bigger than the opposition’s show in Lahore. In his speech, Sharif came down hard on Khan, the PTI chief. Calling
him Ilzam (allegation) Khan, Sharif questioned his political values.
Khan, he said, threatened the chief secretary and others with jail.
“Imran Khan himself will go to jail,” Sharif said. “Five judges threw Nawaz Sharif out but the people’s court elected him
again. Double standards of justice are unacceptable. Justice will be
served if it remains the same for the rich, for the poor and for the
prime minister.”

For many Pakistan watchers, a big concern is that the country is moving in the direction of forming deeper bonds with other countries and lessening American influence in the area. Following the U.S. decision to cut nearly all American security aid
to Pakistan, the country’s defense minister announced that
Islamabad will begin purchasing more weapons from China, Russia, and
other Eastern European countries. “We have a long relationship [with the U.S.], and we want to keep it,” Khurram Dastgir Khan assured Bloomberg
in an interview saying that his country would,
nonetheless, increasingly acquire weapons from countries other than the
U.S. This comes at a time when Pakistan has been increasingly turning to China for military aid. Beijing is now building an offshore naval base near a strategic Pakistani port.

Experts
say it is typical for Pakistan to turn to other world powers when its
relationship with the U.S. sours. “In the past when the U.S. has
suspended military aid to Pakistan, such as following the 1965
India-Pakistan War and again in the 1990s because of the Pakistani
nuclear program, Pakistan saw relations with other major powers,
especially China, as a means of procuring arms and military equipment,”
Harrison Akins, a security expert at The Howard Baker Center for Public
Policy, told Newsweek. “In the current situation, it is
the Trump administration’s behavior that is a distinct break from past
patterns in this relationship, as it suspends aid and publicly rebukes
Pakistan’s duplicity simultaneously with the ramping up of U.S. forces
in Afghanistan,” he continued. Akins also noted that the U.S. usually adopts a pragmatic
view of its relationship with Pakistan and only rebukes the country
when it is disengaging from South Asia and therefore needs Pakistan’s
support less.

The ambiguous and confused history of relations
between the US and Pakistan is a clear example of the politically realistic view that in international politics, every state is motivated by its national
interest which is frequently concealed as a moral concern. There
is no friend or enemy when it comes to the national interest. Diplomacy, deterrence,
bilateralism, multilateralism and blame-game tactics all provide areas for these interest grounds for
these interests to surface. In terms of strategic geopolitics, President Donald Trump's Afghanistan policy and his criticism of
Islamabad on the issue of terrorism marks a clear line of conflict
between the U.S. and Pakistan. Trump's allegations against Pakistan and
his support of India as a strategic ally on both security and economic
fronts has caused grave concern in Islamabad. Pakistan's cool
welcome for visiting U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in October
indicates Islamabad's grievances over Trump's Afghanistan policy
statement.

Too many politicians each day confirms that going forward economic ideologies and economics trump past alliances. Economic prosperity,
sustainable development, and resource exploration have become increasingly important factors in a country's ability to retain its national integrity. With the One Belt Road
Initiative (OBOR) and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC),
it appears those guiding Pakistan forward see strengthening their strategic and economic ties
with China will help Pakistan reduce its dependency on the U.S. and its allies
in the West. The ambitious OBOR development strategy China unleashed in 2013, has already resulted in investment projects that include thousands of miles of highways in Pakistan, an international airport in Nepal and a rail link between China and Laos.Couple this with the criticism flowing from Washington and we can understand why Pakistan clarify its relationship with
the U.S.

Footnote; In coming days I will be posting an article about China's One Belt Road
Initiative (OBOR) and some of the ramifications we can expect as it unfolds.

2 comments:

Pakistan seems like a very bad neighbor to have, so I do feel sorry for India in that regard.

Pakistan is majority Muslim, and when you have lots of fundamentalist Muslims, that creates all sorts of problems, including being sympathetic to their Taliban brothers. It seems like there is real contention in Pakistan between more moderate Muslims and the hard liners.

Regarding China and their One Road Belt initiative, I really look at that with a very skeptical eye. How will they afford to build such a massive undertaking given the extreme terrain in that part of the world?

Granted, there are tons of people in Pakistan, but Nepal has maybe 30 million? Will the One Road go to India as well? India doesn't seem to be a big fan of China. Does China really think that they will receive as much revenue from those countries as it does from selling products to Western nations, who have far higher disposable incomes per capita?

I don't think that the average Pakistani, or Indian, or Nepali will be buying a new top of the line iPhone or android phone every year like in America. I am not convinced that China will ever make back the investment in such a project, and let's not forget that sheer amount of maintenance such a project would need. I suppose we will see what happens, but personally I think they will greatly overextend themselves.

I want to use this opportunity to share this great testimony with you; the best thing that has ever happened in my life is how i won the lottery. My name is Melissa Cramer i never believed that one day i will even win the lottery game. Finally my dreams came through when i email Dr Ahmed and tell him i need the lottery numbers who he has used in helping other people in winning the lottery game. i have come a long way spending money on ticket just to make sure i win but nothing happened. I never know that winning the lottery game was so easy until the day i meant the spell caster online which so many people has talked about that he is very great in casting lottery spell, so i decide to give it a try by contacting him and this man did the spell and gave me the winning lottery numbers. But believe me when the draws were out i was among the winners. i won $500,000 million. Fellow this link http://www.mlive.com/lottery/index.ssf/2017/07/several_major_lottery_winners.html Dr Ahmed truly you are the best, with the help of Dr Ahmed i assure you that you can win millions of money through lottery game without fear. i advice you to contact him now if you really want to win the way i won, contact him via his Email address: Ahmedutimate@gmail.com What’s-app / call him +2348160153829 I less assure you that you will never regret being in contact with Dr Ahmed is the only answer to that your problem of winning the lottery.

About Me

Bruce Wilds is a contractor that owns real estate in the Midwest, his holdings include apartments and office complexes. He is anchored to reality and the economy as he maintains, designs, and leases buildings. This has made him keenly aware of rapidly changing lifestyles, this blog incorporates many of the experiences and knowledge from his hands-on business style, extensive travels, and studies of history, politics and economics.