it is hardly surprising that UKIP finds itself in this sort of muddle, due largely to totally inept leadership and a lack of any concept of serious training EVER being undertaken in the party’s 20 year history.

The blatant lack of strategy, tactics or even an outline plan, beyond ‘we must win more elections’ accounts for the continuous abject failure of UKIP in domestic elections.

That UKIP fielded over 1,700 candidates and only managed to get 147 elected and a number of them have had to resign already and now we have a further batch following their leaders examples and finding themselves under police investigation!

20 years of posturing mostly as a one man band propped up with public money syphoned off the tax payers by the odious and corrupt EU and still UKIP are little closer to having an MP elected and have not a single solitary noteworthy representative of any gravitas or stature.

I gather Lincolnshire is not the only region in disarray, in the Eastern Region they are openly working with the Tories regardless of the party policy and have all but given the bumptious Peter Reeves his marching orders on the basis of ‘who do you think you are, we are councillors too’!

With UKIP’s regional MEP in the East Middlands found guilty of defrauding the public purse and ordered to repay tens of £1,000s and the regional organiser a man of questionable talents and clearly not worth the income he admitted to during his trial as a drunk driver with it seems every family member he could muster climbing on the UKIP gravy train, regardless of competence or qualification, just to make up numbers for the money!

Then we have the leadership skills of UKIP in the Eastern Region to contend with where both the UKIP MEPs Stuart Agnew and David Bannerman are under investigation by OLAF for defrauding the public purse as they admitted on camera for The Sunday Times and liars and self serving scoundrels like Andrew Smith & Mick McGough manipulating & rigging UKIP selections for their personal gain as also did Jeffrey Titford & Stuart Gulleford before them.

In just what way can UKIP be seen as fit for purpose and what is that purpose beyond the enrichment of a small clique as they have failed abysmally to make their position clear and are thus seemingly little more than political prostitutes where Farage’s clique and its claque will prostitute them,selves to any values that gain them cash or clout as shown by their association with the EDL and the EFD Group and their willing apparent incitement to racial hatred as most clerarly displayed, not by the likes of Chris Pain & his chums in Lincoln but by the vile writtings of Gerard Batten and before him Jeffrey Titford’s assistant Tony Bennett.

Just where does UKIP imagine it is going and what purpose do they serve in domestic politics, beyond acting as a dustbin for people to cast their protest votes in, and risking ensuring we return to the 13 catastrophic unlucky years of Labour ineptitude, dishonesty, corruption and economic illiteracy that would see the EUroSceptic cause set back by a generation, even possibly fatally wounded, by UKIP’s inept irresponsibility and lack of strategy or training!

POLICE have stepped in to investigate allegations of racism against three newly-elected UKIP politicians on Lincolnshire County Council.

Officers will probe claims of allegedly racist comments on Facebook by leader Chris Pain and two colleagues.

​

Chris Pain

The authority referred the case to police following “several” complaints from members of the public.

The UK Independence Party itself is also looking into the matter, and the third councillor being investigated is Alan Jesson.

He said: “I am shocked my good name is being dragged through the mud. They are not my comments.

“I won’t be taking any action because I don’t know where to start and I don’t have the money to do it anyway.

“Ever since UKIP councillors were elected on May 2 there has been a concerted effort to ruin us.”

All three are new members of Lincolnshire County Council. None of them has taken action against the claims or reported the online abuse to Facebook.

Lincolnshire County Council’s director for performance and governance, David O’ Connor, said: “We are taking complaints very seriously.”

Councillor Pain, leader of the opposition at Lincolnshire County Council, said his Facebook account had been hacked into. Similarly, Ms Keywood-Wainwright said some of the comments were the result of her account being hacked – but did however admit to some.

If only UKIP was fit for the purpose people could vote for their stance in favour of Leave-The-EU – sadly no one of any ethical standing would wish to be associated with their overt and undeniable racism and their support for anti Judaism, anti homosexual and much reported misogyny.

In the light of their alliance with pro EU membership extremist groups and their clear policy of EU reform those who wish to Leave-The-EU would clearly be misled were they to vote for UKIP in its present odious form, with its self serving, self enriching clique of scoundrels forming the leadership aided by a claque of cowards and dishonest bullies.

UKIP Have A Skill at Getting It WRONG!
Sadly a skill with a near perfect consistency when it comes to failure in domestic elections!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Farage’s latest Tory deal – deja vu all over again!

Back in 2010 when Farage had resigned as leader in order to come third in the Bucks seat to dwarf Bercow and almost get himself killed in a plane crash, his stooge leader Pearson produced his whizzo electoral pact plan in the South West that UKIP candidates should stand down in about 6 seats where there was an avowedly Eurosceptic Tory candidate to avoid spliting the right wing vote. Pearson was the UKIP leader who had not bothered to read his own General Election manifesto and resigned shortly after the May 2010 UKIP electoral failure to allow Nigel to return from his temporary Bucks exile. Pearson’s proposals were not well received by the UKIP activists in the South West. Let us hope the Hamiltons meet the same frosty reception in 2014.

Roll on 3 years to the run up to the 2015 general election and I read in today’s DT, “Farage in talks on deal with 20 Eurosceptic MPs”, is the headline. As it says in Eccelesiastes the sun rises and the sun sets and there is nothing new under the sun even the one that shines out of Farage’s bum on the poor saps in UKIP. Click on http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10081456/Nigel-Farage-I-can-do-deals-at-the-next-election-with-20-Conservative-MPs.html to read the piece now entitled, “I can do deals with 20 Conservative MPs at next election”. Why only 20 Nigel, why not the 100 who are currently feeling their majorities. That’s the figure Nads mentions in her Sunday paper piece.

The DT piece also reveals that follwing his less than successful visit to Scotland Nigel has had to hire a team of bodyguards to protect himself in Westminster. How much is this costing UKIP? Nigel does not do paying but he is quoted that UKIP is mounting a fresh drive to recruit more white working class Labour voters. Are these the bodyguards referred to in the previous paragraph?

What will the deal be to support these untrustworthy Tories? What will be the payback to UKIP? There will of course be no details that the UKIP NEC will see because the deal will be between Farage and the Tories not UKIP and the Tories. Farage has long craved the warm feeling of red leather on his bum. That would allow him to maintain his lucrative position as MEP and obergruppenfurher in Brussels. Its a win win situation for Nigel.but on his own figures 20 UKIP activists will be shafted. Clearly a price worth paying as Nigel does not have to do the paying. Lord Farage of Brussels or even Waterloo only a few miles away.

The real politik is that Pearson has a valid point. In 2010 in Wells the LibDem Tessa Munt defeated the Euro sceptic Heathcote Amory by 800 votes with the UKIP candidate who in losing his deposited polled 1710 votes more than twice La Munt’s majority. The same thing happened at Eastleigh where if the Tories had stood down in favour of Mrs James she would have been elected as MP with a 10000+ majority and would be headed to be UKIP leader by acclamation at the next Sept conference.

The problem is one can never trust the Tories or ex-Tory Nigel Farage. My word is my bond used to be the dictum in the City but not any more. It is a conumdrum that I can see no way out of without breaching electoral law. Cameron did his sordid deal wih Clegg not for the good of the country but to get into Downing Street. Clegg did it to get his bum into the Cabinet with his dodgy cronies like Huhne and Laws. It was for the good of the country they cry. Bollocks I say self interest rules OK in politics, always has always will. It was the same when Farage tried to tell me many Tory MPs entered parliament to serve their country. I laughed. MPs serve themselves and help themselves to as much public money as they can get without going to gaol.

Clegg signed a pledge to the students in public before the last election. After he had their votes that pledge was not worth the paper it was written on. Note how that other LibDem pledge on giving constituents the power to recall MPs who break their election promised has mysteriously disappeared from the political landscape. I wonder why?

It can’t be done within our current system of party dominated representative democracy. The only way out is the Swiss referendum way. If 10% of the electorate in a constituency demand their MP resign and contest a by-election then it happens. That would be a stiff test to pass given only 60% of the electorate bother to vote but it would provide a real discpline on our sordid MPs who get elected and thenwave two fingers at the electorate for the next 4 years.

I can hear the criticism now, its not the British way, what about the Queen etc. Well it seems to work jolly well for the Swiss who have created a great country and they don’t even have a Queen. Note however our royal family are very fond of holidays in Switzerland and ask yourself why? Even Mrs T used to go on holiday there. Its nice to stay in a country that works and lacks diversity.

Dr. Eric Edmond blogs on a regular basis on UKIP, much of which I agree with – however his lack of answers and inability to control his temper let him down badly when he was elected to UKIP NEC and was so rapidly out manoevered by Farage and his cronies.

Out manoevered by the presentation of a pack of lies against him which he was unable to defend himself against dispassionately and his volatility lost him both the argument and friends!

That said his blog has bee a regular commentary on the follies of Farage and his cronies and also is a well informed insight into the vagieries of the banking world, which formed a considerable part of his background where with his Doctorate in mathematics his skills were exploited at the Bank of England.

I do commend that anyone seeking a clear understanding of the banking issues of Britain and the EU make a point of reading his blog regularly and along the way one will pick up some facts pertaining to the corruption of UKIP that may have passed you by.

Eric’s opinions are a good point from which to start a debate on the protocols and policies of UKIP, in as far as they have any worth discussing!

On the issue of colaboration with Tories opposed to membership of The EU Eric overlooks the previous election when Farage set out to work with EUroSceptic MPs and PPCs and working to a shortlist which I drew up aeveral UKIP PPCs stood down and all was doing well until that foul mouthed, bufoon Nattrass had a temper tantrum and decided to personally make a fool of himself standing against one of the most noted Tory EUroSceptics and also recruited the owner of his favourite Chines restaurant to stand against another!

The entire election became a total farce for UKIP with the normal catastrophic outcome, from which they had to be saved by Dr. Richard North and I dreaming up the myth that they had cost the Tories 27 seats – which Richard took forward as a paper for The Brughes Group!

It seemed essential that UKIP was given some relevance in view of their serial failures in domestic elections where even now they are realistically no closer to having an MP elected and out of over 1,700 seats contested they managed a mere 147 elected and even they seem to be falling like flies when under the spotlight!!

Hi,This internal UKIP conversation was forwarded to me by someone seeking to expose the underlying levels of racism in UKIP, who had had it mailed to them– soto protect their identity I had to leave out the next step of the conversation, but this alone goes some way to show just how deeply entrenched is the inadequacy ofmany senior UKIP members and just how ignorant they are of thebackground of many Muslims they are, not to mention how unchristian their values are amongst UKIP and how extensive their racist roots are!

Yesterday’s incident in Woolwich and Cameron’s pathetic claptrap today – “never give in to terrorism” – it’s been here in the UK for years and successive governments have done nothing. Surely this gives UKIP a chance: let’s get away from the widely held and spouted view of CON/LAB/LIB politicians that the vast majority of muslims are law abiding and these attacks are isolated incidents. The modus operandi is clear although it’s not in the Koran – jihad is being preached by imams in mosques up and down the country while our PC-riddled police turn a blind eye. Incitement to kill is a serious crime in this country and the perpetrators must be rounded up and punished. Many muslims have dual passports, allowing them to come and go as they please in order to visit grandma in a remote part of Pakistan etc. Anyone convicted of incitement who is found to have “dual nationality” should be deported immediately on completion of their sentences, (although British public is also tired of putting them up at their expense). No sharia law either – if they can’t abide by British laws then their welcome is ended. It’s time the police did their job – access to emails and the internet in general is easy and intelligence gathering is well within their grasp provided the politicians leave them to do the job.

And on the subject of political control of the police: the 16% turnout and the ridicule poured down on our Kent Police Commissioner following her ridiculous appointment earlier this year stand out: time already to abolish this expensive and unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. The Home Secretary is an elected politician and to he alone should the police report. And let the police do the job they were designed to do – as Tom Windsor spelt out a few weeks ago – TO PREVENT CRIME – instead of this stupid “keeping us safe” (they don’t and can’t of course without shutting everything down).

I think it should be made plain that the entire family of any individual who commits a terrorist are all deported. I do not believe the claims of family members that they never knew their husband, father, or brother was planning jihad. These people might think twice if while they were enjoying paradise with their 40 virgins (what do the women get?) their families are sent back to the hole they left behind in the middle and far east.

I appreciate this does not represent the views, values or opinions of all in UKIP but it is irefutable that UKIP leade rship is represented by this type of conversation or why else would they prostitute UKIP to support and assistance to their undeniably racist allies in The EU.Claims that UKIP are not racist are clearly dishonest, and as plausible as The EDL pretending they have ethics and represent anything other than the basest and most odious in our society – yet you will be aware that various senior UKIP members are closely affiliated to The EDL and some attend their vile parades and protests.

One need only read the vile incitement to hatred based on superstition and ethnicity emanating from the odious liar and UKIP MEP Gerard Batten to realise just how racist UKIP is and furthermore just how blinkered they are to their own racism and corrupt hatred and all based on stupid superstition and ignorance!

It never ceases to astonish me that UKIP members can be foolish as to reject my considered contention that UKIP led by Nigel Farage is about as much use, in terms of EUroScepticism as they are fit for purpose leading an EU withdrawalist group!

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

PS 05-Jun-2013:
I have REDACTED the names of those to whom distribution was made as I gather that sadly, it being UKIP, certain of the recipients of the correspondence shown were being harassed for being recipients of this correspondence where clearly they had not authored the material.

I have NOT seen rebuttal of this unpleasant racist series of UKIP eMails to date! However I am unsurprised as clearly UKIP is a fundamentally racist party, as shown by its close association with various more honest and overt racist parties and organisations!
GL-W..

The UKIP Circus Rolls On! As Roger Helmer provides an excellent example of just why UKIP MEP’s are largely a waste of space!
An issue addressed by its founder Prof. Alan Sked at CLICK HERE further clarified HERE!

It is decades since I attended a proper circus, so it was an exciting opportunity to revisit an important cultural tradition. But the main reason for going was to get some context on the on-going debate on the use of animals in circus (and indeed in zoos). So appropriately enough we started with the animals, which between shows are kept in zoo-type conditions, with cages but also with small exercise areas. This facility operates between shows as a zoo, and is visited as such by the public, for entertainment and edification. There were of course horses. I spend much of my time around horses, having a couple at home, and to my untutored eye these beasts seemed to be in good condition, and entirely relaxed.

I reflected that keeping and training horses for dressage is regarded as a wholly excellent activity. Yet when similar training and performance is undertaken for the circus, it seems to get the strident animal rights lobby hot under the collar.

To read more of this article which has absolutely no meaningful connection with Roger Helmer Tory turncoat UKIP MEP’s hugely over paid job as a salesman for the EU CLICK HERE

Perhaps someone can explain how this sort of jolly can be justified as a part of his chosen duty to work for Britain to Leave-The-EU – any more than his vociferous support for fraud in the case of Tom Wise’s embezzling of public funds for his own use!

Just how can UKIP MEPs be seen as either value for money or even fit for purpose when this is the sort of activity they indulge in – How does this progress the cause of EUroScepticism?

I do concede it is an improvement on much of their iresponsible racist, anti homosexual anti Jewish libertine behaviour, that has done such harm to the EUroSceptic cause as they persue their own indulgence and prop themselves up with a claque of largely useless and over paid hirelings funded by the public purse.
.

Clearly Far Too Little Far Too Late for UKIP’s Racist Reputation & the informed will remember that Nigel Farage promised he would be thrown out of the racist, xenophobic, anti Jewish and anti homosexual Pan EU Political EFD Group he founded and presides over before but nothing came of his promises and bluster!

Many will remember the support members of Farage’s group gave Anders Brevick after his cowardly mass murder in Norway!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~

UKIP removes Italian MEP for racist insult at black Italian minister

The UK Independence Party ordered the suspension from the European Parliament of an MEP who delivered a racist tirade against Italy’s first black government minister, it emerged on Thursday.

Mr Borghezio was suspended from the right-wing Europe of Freedom and Democracy groupPhoto: Getty Images

By Nick Squires, Rome and Bruno Waterfield in Brussels

3:42PM BST 23 May 2013

Mario Borghezio said Congolese-born Cecile Kyenge, who was recently appointed minister for integration, would be more suited to being a “housekeeper” or a low-level council official than a minister and claimed that she would impose African “tribal traditions” on Italy.

In remarks which were widely condemned in Italy, he said that Mrs Kyenge’s inclusion in the coalition of Enrico Letta, the newly-elected prime minister, made it a “bongo bongo” administration.

He said her appointment, which was hailed by many Italians as a positive step that reflected the changing face of Italian society, was “a shit choice”.

Mr Borghezio, a member of the xenophobic Northern League who has made incendiary remarks about immigrants in the past, was suspended from the right-wing Europe of Freedom and Democracy group in the European Parliament on Wednesday.

The suspension was driven by British MEPs from Nigel Farage’s party, who were angered and embarrassed by Mr Borghezio’s remarks.

Related Articles

“We have asked for him to be expelled from the group. So far he has been suspended,” a UKIP spokesman told The Daily Telegraph.

A source close to Mr Farage said the Italian MEP had been a “nightmare” to work with and that the party would be “glad to see the back of him”.

Mr Borghezio is a deeply controversial figure who has in the past praised Col Gadaffi as a “great leader” and was found guilty of arson after setting fire to pallets belonging to some immigrants who were living beneath a bridge in Turin.

Increasingly influential in British politics, UKIP is keen to distance itself from the sorts of racist views espoused by right-wing partners like Mr Borghezio.

“Our British colleagues were indignant and called for him to go. That’s why there was a request for his suspension, and Borghezio did not oppose it,” Francesco Speroni, the joint head of the group, told Corriere della Sera newspaper.

Mr Borghezio may end up being expelled altogether — his fate will be decided during the next session of the parliament in Strasbourg in mid-June.

His expulsion would require the assent of a two-thirds majority of the political grouping.

He came close to being kicked out two years ago when he appeared to justify the bombing and mass shooting carried out by Anders Behring Breivik in Oslo, saying that Norway’s “multiracial society” was to blame.

He had been warned by UKIP officials that if he made one more gaffe, he would face expulsion.

Mrs Kyenge, 48, an eye surgeon who was born in the Democratic Republic of Congo but moved to Italy 30 years ago, has been subjected to a tirade of racial abuse since her appointment.

Much of it has circulated on the internet, with the minister, who is a member of the centre-Left Democratic Party, called “a Congolese monkey” and a “Zulu” on websites, some of them with links to neo-Fascist groups.

Mr Borghezio was by far the most high-profile figure to attack the new minister.

“Africans are different. They belong to an ethnicity much different from ours. They haven’t produced great genes,” he said.

In response to his comments, an online petition was launched in Italy calling for his expulsion from the European Parliament.

Organised by Articolo 21, a freedom of information advocacy group, it gathered more than 130,000 signatures and was sent to Martin Schultz, the president of the European Parliament.

Chris PAIN & UKIP’s Dilema Based on Both His & UKIP’s Apparent Racist Track Record!
That UKIP Chooses to be allied and support racist bigots and extremists as partners leaves them absolutely no plausible way to deny their racist extremism!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
Hi,

having started a thread on a Forum regarding UKIP NEC member and recently elected Councillor Chris PainBarbara Booker’s comments:

Under the headline ‘Racist rants of the UKIP councillors’, the Sunday Mirror writes:

quote

Ukip’s Chris Pain, leader of the opposition at Lincs Council and the party’s East Midlands regional chairman, wrote: “Have you noticed that if you *rearrange the letters in ‘illegal *immigrants’, and add just a few more letters, it spells, ‘Go home you free-loading, benefit-grabbing, resource-sucking, baby-making, non-English-speaking ********* and take those other hairy-faced, sandal-wearing, bomb-making, camel-riding, goat-********, raghead ******** with you.’”

Mr Pain said the comments on his Facebook pages were “not my original posts or writings”, claiming his *account had been hacked.

ends

What exactly is Chris Pain saying? The so-called joke about rearranging the letters of the words ‘illegal immigrants’ has been around for several years, so the question is not whether it originated from him but whether he has ever posted it to Facebook? Or is he claiming that someone else, having “hacked” his account, posted it to his Facebook page without his knowledge or consent?

This gave rise to the following response from ex UKIP NEC member Ian Gillman who resigned from the NEC as her was unwilling to be party to the corruption, oaffish behaviour and risk of joint and several liability in the risk of stolen public money and abuse, foul language, lies and bullying!:

Barboo in # 1 above kindly draws to our attention to alledged writings by UKIP Councillor, Mr Chris Pain of Skegness who also appears to be the East Midlands Regional Chairman and an N.E.C. member.

Mr Pain, it appears; claims that it is ” not my original posts or writings “.

Certain very nasty e-mails written by Mr Pain with numerous contact details for him provided, are in circulation, wherein he denigrates a range of persons. They are all destined for ‘Junius’ as explained and urged by Mr Pain. There does appear to be a parallel here.

Interestingly a Mr Gwain Towler who is a UKIP paid official I think put out a public statement about certain matters ,appears within one of those nasty e-mails written by Chris Pain. He was certainly given the special Pain treatment, as was Derek Clark MEP, whilst Mr Nigel Farage was described as watching Mr Pain and his activities very closely as Mr Pain describes his intent to deceive.

It does appear that a discliplinary case file that has already been prepared for Mr Pain will have even more to consider now.

Or, would Mr Pain like to deny herein writing nasty e-mails and circulating them ?

Mr Pain sought legal advice from a Mr Don Ransome, the East Midlands Regional Organiser/Press Officer. Mr Ransome is not qualified to offer legal advice , but never mind that, he offered it.

Would it not be best for Mr Pain to resign as a County Councillor, Regional Chairman , NEC member and from UKIP itself ? Then, he should write a sincerely apologetic letter to Mr Anthony Ellwood the 15 year serving treasurer ( including a short spell as national treasurer during an interregnum) who during an attempt to reconcile the national accounts uncovered 95% and perhaps even more movements from the account as conversions into cash that went to unknown places. ? Mr Pain has ( along with his friend Mr Ransome) treated Mr Ellwood shoddily, denigrating him . For what reason we can but ask ?

Gillman’s somewhat obsessive and tediouson the public forum were I gather, seen as libellous as he could not supply the provenance he claimed he had and would not retract his claims relative to Chris Pain!

This led, I had believed, to a lifetime ban for Gillman, though it seems he is still posting as at 22-May!

Also having made a perfectly civil and proper posting in a Private Message to on of the moderators which read as follows:

Originally Posted by Geoffrey Collier

Dear Mr Allen,

You told me originally that my request would be forwarded to Anthony Butcher, while now you seem to have decided the matter yourself. I have just finished a telephone conversation with a barrister who knows much about UKIP, and she said that you cannot deliberately destroy published information, or deny a harmed party access to it for their legal purposes. You are certainly doing the latter of those things. Are you saying quite categorically that Mr Butcher has made this decison, and you are merely communicationg it to me?

If you believe that I have lied on the thread, which I certainly dispute, would you like to identify those lies, and confirm that you are permitted to punish me in the way that you have decided? Mr Fear made a statement on the thread which was wholly false. He seems unable to identify any supporting evidence on Junius. Your claim that I have a history of obfuscation, dishonesty and lying, yet I claim that is untrue, and I have not even a ‘parking ticket’ to blemish my good name. Yours is not a fair description of my reputation. You are protecting Mr Pain, an NEC member, who has used information gleaned by two UKIP employees in the course of their employment, to harm others. There can be no doubt about that.

I get the impression that you are deliberatlely protecting Mr Pain for reasons which have little to do with the interests of BDF. I would like the precise name of the person who finally decides to obstruct my request, if that is what they choose to do. Could I also have the legal status of the BDF; private limited company, etc. Should it make things easier for you, can we ignore Mr Gillman’s postings, and confine ourselves to those affecting me, and my other witness Mr Ellwood? (1) Mr Fear’s original statement. (2) Mr Pain’s #373 and the ones involving the UKIP HQ manager. (3) Mr Ransome’s statement. If protecting named persons from libellous statements is important to you, I am sure that you will welcome my request.

Geoffrey Collier.

It is self evident that this eMail is at no stage any kind of threat against the Forum but rather a friendly warning from a long term and trustworthy member of both UKIP and the Forum, which UKIP has from time to time had totally dishonest co0ntrol over through, amongst others, the weak, self serving, dishonest and dublicitous Anthony Butcher who has proved time and again to be untrustworthy and only too willing to provide a platform for dishonesty and lies, abuse and libellous fantasies, as long as it suits UKIP and himself.

It is, in my opinion, dishonestly claimed that Geoffrey Collier, in giving friendly advice privately to a moderator has in some way threatened the forum and this has been at best misguidedly but based upon the Forum track record, more likely, dishonestly used to gag a critic of the corruption in UKIP – Geoffrey Collier has been dishonestly banned from posting on the forum for life (as was I( for having made a statement of FACT and provided provenance of the fact!).

Barbara Booker has gone on helpfully to plead Geoffrey’s case as has Niall Warry, another unstinting campaigner for probity, transparency and an end to corruption in UKIP to make it fit for purpose – not just as a one man band being exploited for the benefit of a small clique and supported by their corrupt claque!

Barbara Booker has summarised various facts, pertaining to Chris Pain and his apparent racist outbursts, as follows:

Be careful what you wish for!

The Skegness Standard reported on 20 May:

quote UKIP has said it will be forced to eject the party’s newly elected Lincolnshire group leader if allegations he has made ‘racist rants’ on Facebook prove true. Party spokesman Gawain Towler said: “They are serious allegations and if proven true there is no way Chris Pain could remain a councillor with UKIP. However we don’t hang a man until he’s proven guilty and at the moment Chris is saying that his account was hacked.” ends

If UKIP decides that Chris Pain’s Facebook account was indeed hacked as he says (and it’s now also being claimed on the ‘Lincoln immigration issues’ site that it too has been hacked), then someone will have to explain why he allowed potentially damaging posts that he didn’t make to remain in place for so many months. If, on the other hand, UKIP decides that he did make the posts himself, and takes action against him as suggested by Gawain Towler, then it will only succeed in making UKIP a political laughing stock. Consider these facts:

Despite the impression created by the Sunday Mirror, which described the ‘illegal immigrants’ post as being among “racist rants of the UKIP councillors”, and Hope not Hate which calls it “the most disgusting racist outburst”, Chris Pain was not the author of the piece. It’s a supposed joke which seems to have originated in America in about 2009 and turns up, with slight variations, on numerous websites in the USA, Australia and here. The Chris Pain version is similar to that found on: http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.co.uk…-lesson-i.html

So, if UKIP decides that Chris Pain did post these items, he will be guilty not of having written them himself but of having forwarded them from elsewhere on the internet.

Those with long enough memories may recall an almost identical case in 2006 when a town councillor from Calne in Wiltshire, Conservative Ellie Bland, was suspended by her party for circulating an email containing the ‘Illegal Immigrants Poem’. She told the Wiltshire Gazette & Herald: “The e-mail is a joke email . . . . I didn’t write it I just forwarded it”, though later claiming that “someone else” had sent the email from her address. http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/ne…racist_e_mail/

Contrast Gawain Towler’s statement above about Chris Pain, with UKIP’s reaction to Cllr Bland and her ‘racist email’. Two months after the story broke, Bland resigned from the Conservatives and was welcomed into UKIP, visited by Nigel Farage, and selected as UKIP candidate for the district council elections. “The support I’m getting is absolutely wonderful”, she gushed, “It’s heart-warming to know a leader will come and visit. If I ring him he answers the phone, talks to me. With David Cameron you could go to a meeting and be lucky to get him to shake your hand.” http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/n…fects_to_UKIP/

UKIP put out an enthusiastic statement, ‘Then there were four’ (26.1.07): “Graham Booth the local MEP said, This is brilliant news”, and even Nigel Farage’s assistant, Annabelle Fuller, had a dig at the LibDems over it on her blog (29.4.2007): “This is the party who caused a huge lot of bother for Councillor Ellie Bland when her husband forwarded an e-mail which was, I think, rather amusing, and accused her of being a ‘racist’.”http://more-to-life-than-shoes.blogs…1_archive.html

UKIP cannot, in all seriousness, now turn against Chris Pain for exactly the same behaviour as resulted in Ellie Bland’s joining them and receiving such a joyful welcome!

Chris Pain does little to help himself and continue wityh outspoken racist views and values that lead one to believe he is just the sort of individual who would have made the comments on Facebook etc but has actually invoked not just the name of UKIP but his position of responsibility on behalf of UKIP and particularly its electorate in Lincolnshire, as the following article shows:

UKIP members of Lincolnshire County Council refuse to back anti-racism pledge

Coun Pain told The Standard that his account had been hacked and that he had not made the post himself. He said he does not agree with the words written and would never use them himself.He told The Standard: “At the moment I am changing passwords like crazy and putting locks on.”

What I do not at all understand is, since the post in question was apparently made on 4 November 2012, seehttp://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013…?utm_hp_ref=uk, why Chris Pain didn’t remove it and take action to safeguard his facebook account straight away? Why wait until now, when a post made in his name by someone else has been splashed all over the Sunday Mirror, before changing passwords and putting locks on?

Likewise with the earlier ‘asylum’ post, made 13 August 2012.

Was he the victim of yet another hacker with that one?

I trust that helps to pull together some of the strands in this ongoing saga regarding UKIP Racism and the part in it which UKIP NEC member and former assistant to UKIP PPC Dick Horsnell from the Isle of Man, who laid the groundwork for much of UKIP’s achievements in the area with his substantial capital injection and committed campaigning via market stalls and carrier bags etc.

For the record – despite the obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies of those trying to hide the truth about UKIP as it is – It is of absolutely no consequence how many read this blog or this web site or my Twitter or my postings around the internet and elsewhere, just like UKIP membership numbers are of no consequence just as it is irrelevant how many watch a UKIP video in America, China or even France – it is a matter of the caliber of those who read the entries NOT numbers.

This web site and all its entries are posted as an archive and if ONE person of influence reads it whether media, politician or individual and it leads to cleaning up & professionalising UKIP & giving it some ethical gravitas and consequence thus making it fit for purpose as a party, which British citizens would be proud to join to Leave-The-EU it has served its purpose.

This blog is an archive available to all and made as accurate as possible, clearly differentiating between my opinions and values and factual reportage of UKIP.

As is clear: Any error of fact is always corrected, if brought to my attention, and comments are always published – for as long as they are compliant with the terms clearly stated as follows:

We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted, which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual.

You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner.

We welcome genuine comments.

From my conversations with Team Junius I gather their aims are largely similar, as is their aim to inform and provide an archive of facts in support of UKIP becoming fit for purpose to lead to Leave-The-EU, which clearly it currently is not as it tends to represent its own personal ambitions rather than British self determination, values and ethics.

For more FACTS regarding the accuracy of this site and my postings elsewhere read CLICK HERE

For more FACTS & information about me, including contact data, IF it will help you understand the FACTS this web site and my many other postings cover CLICK HERE

I NEVER post in cowardly anonymity, nor obfuscate my identity as I believe it is an ethical matter of integrity to stand by ones comments. If unsure or deliberately misleading one should NOT demean oneself by dishonesty hiding one’s identity as a coward or a traitor would.

For the record I have NEVER had personal aspirations politically, nor have I ever stood for office; further I have NEVER joined or been a member or been funded by any political party, faction or similar organisation.

I trust these facts help clarify details for the ill informed and the outright liars who seek to defame me, my blogs, postings and web sites.

Debacle Over The Tartan Curtain & UKIP Racism! One IS Judged by One’s Friends & as such UKIP is inescapably Racist, anti Jewish, anti homosexual and violent, having prostituted its ethics, ostensibly for cash rewards for its leader!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

although I am aware that there have been and will be claims of internet hacking by the members of UKIP, a Party undeniably linked with racism, when they are caught out in racist rants or other imature & crass behaviour.

Such claims fall into the catagory of ‘they would say that wouldn’t they‘ and thus render the claims of hacking or being misquoted all too implausible.

That UKIP’s candidates who were elected are in the main both insignificant and unheard of makes the claims yet more implausible as ‘hacking’ is a complex and skilled task and there seems every likelihood that no one of significance has been able to prove, in any way, that they have been hacked. Who exactly could be bothered hacking such irelevant individuals – frankly I incline not to believe this widespread claim of hacking!

You must draw your own conclusions but note that major national media outlets have a small army of lawyers who vet material to ensure its veracity and if there is genuine doubt they would rather spike a true story than risk facing the courts in a libel case where the courts tend to award disproportionate compensation to the ranks of nebishes bringing claims, despite the fact that their case would have required around £100,000 to be paid up front to fund front end costs in the High Courts!

Let us look first at this story below and then consider the other claims:

UKIP Councillor’ racist rants:

More of Nigel Farage’s troops exposed as bigots!

A Sunday Mirror investigation has discovered sickening rants on the Facebook pages of party officials

Crackdown: Nigel Farage said the party is researching candidates’ backgrounds

PA

Nigel Farage’s UKIP party is still riddled with racism… despite his claim of a crackdown.

A Sunday Mirror investigation has discovered sickening rants on the Facebook pages of party officials.

Details of their vitriol emerged only days after Eric Kitson quit as a councillor in Stourbridge, Worcs, after we exposed his internet slurs against Muslims and Jews.

Last month Farage claimed “a huge amount of time and money” had been spent researching the backgrounds of council candidates.

He said: “Our membership is up nearly 50 per cent, and inevitably we are going to have one or two teething problems.”

But today we can reveal his members’ latest hate-fuelled ­postings.

Immigrants rant: Councillor Chris Pain

Ukip’s Chris Pain, leader of the opposition at Lincs Council and the party’s East Midlands regional chairman, wrote: “Have you noticed that if you ­rearrange the letters in ‘illegal ­immigrants’, and add just a few more letters, it spells, ‘Go home you free-loading, benefit-grabbing, resource-sucking, baby-making, non-English-speaking ********* and take those other hairy-faced, sandal-wearing, bomb-making, camel-riding, goat-********, raghead ******** with you.’”

Mr Pain has also ­objected to foreign doctors working in the NHS.

Last May he posted a story about a Hungarian medic who bungled an operation on a four-year-old boy in Manchester, and wrote: “We don’t want them taking all the jobs in the local community and we certainly don’t want them working in our hospitals!”

“If I ever see him on a Greyhound bus wearing a rucksack, I’m getting off!!”

Barack barracking: Peter Entwistle said Obama is a Muslim

The party’s deputy chairman in Scotland, Misty Thackeray, “liked” a Facebook group claiming “paedophilia is part of Islamic tradition”.

He also praised far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders, a self-­confessed “hater of Islam”.

Recommending Mr Wilders’ new book, he said: “Geert is great …(peace be upon him.. lol) ..!”

Meanwhile Tiggs Keywood-­Wainwright, a Ukip councillor in Boston, Lincs, complained about mosques being built in “quintessentially English” Cambridge. “Is nowhere sacred for the Brits in Britain any more?” she wrote.

“Bottom line is we have too many muslims in this country!”

Mr Pain said the comments on his Facebook pages were “not my original posts or writings”, claiming his ­account had been hacked.

Mr Entwistle laughed when confronted about his President Obama bus comments, saying: “I don’t think I’d be the only one getting off.”

“Too many Muslims”: Tiggs Keywood-Wainwright

Sunday Mirror

Mr Thackeray refused to comment on “this ridiculous nonsense”. He said Mr Wilders was a “legally, democratically-elected politician”.

Ms Keywood-Wainwright admitted she “probably” regretted some of her remarks.

She claimed she meant there were too many Muslims “in certain areas”, adding: “My GPs are all Muslims and I have no ­problem with them at all.

“One of them is extremely nice and very, very good at her job.”

Farage described demonstrators who besieged him in Edinburgh on Thursday as “fascist scum”.

He also slammed the phone down on a BBC interviewer questioning him about Scots issues.

That Nigel Farage found himself the4 victim of some of the abusive low life inadequates that seem all too prevalent in Scotland comes as no surprise to me having personally been dishonestly and corruptly abused in efforts to defame the facts I have published by some of the all too similar scum such as Matt Quinn, George McKendrick and a host of other vile Scottish ne’er do wells and failed personalities with their inadequacies writ large in bile in the manner they bear chips on both shoulders! Just look on the internet and you will find their cyber bullying and dishonest abuse all to readily!

That Nigel Farage played right into the hand of these cowardly parasites is indisputable with the overt racism, anti homosexuality, xenophobia and misogyny of the partners he chose for UKIP as its allies in The EU and increasingly it seems he chose as candidates within his own party as shown by the recent resignations amongst his all too small group of recently elected Councillors (a mere 147 out of the 1,700+ which he fielded!). None in Scotland you may note!

Consider the claims of being misquoted by Anne-Marie Crampton on this blog, when recently she claimed the media deliberately lied about her CLICK HERE

OR consider the following entry from another blogger:

RACIST TWEETS FROM UKIP CANDIDATE RON NORTHCOTT

Scots have been accused of being racist and fascist by Nigel Farage.

Does he know the meaning of the words? Does his colleague Mr Northcott?

What does Farage think of the tweets shown above (click to enlarge) from Mr Northcott?

Farage accused Thursday’s small crowd, some estimates said 20 people (Nigel had it at 50), of being anti-English because they told him they didn’t want to see the union jack in Scotland again.

Does he know what the flag of England is?

Did he know that one of the organisers of the protest is English?

Nigel was launching his party’s bid to take the by election seat in Donside.

Does he have any idea how far away from Edinburgh Donside is? (AsBella Caledoniasaid, can you imagine him launching an election bid for Leeds from Birmingham?)

Farage and Thatcher. She’s the one ON the mug

Farage was outraged that in a democracy he wasn’t even allowed to make his point before being shouted down. I’d concede him a point there. We should have let him tell us what his policies were: policies like repatriating powers to Westminster, getting rid of women’s and gay rights, abolishing our fairer system of elections, adopting English policies on education (£9,000 a year) and health (selling off the health service) and public services, before we told him we didn’t want any of it.

But Farage wasn’t so keen to make his point when he was asked, politely, about his party’s dismal showings in Scotland.BBC Scotland’s telephone interviewwas relatively easy going compared with what SNP ministers have to handle. There were no hard hitting questions on some of the dodgier UKIP members, who earned the party the reputation for being clowns; no questions about Farage and his mates in Brussels and Strasbourgallegedlymissing vital committee meetings where British fishing interests were in question, because they were allegedly drunk. (Interesting that Northcott above seemed to find it strange that a “jock” would be sober enough to string a sentence together.

This is Mr Northcott. The one with the red nose

In his answers he conflated anti UK sentiments with anti English sentiments. And complained that he had been surrounded by people who wanted to take Scotland out of the UK. How on earth can he criticise an independence movement when his own party’s name is the UKINDEPENDENCEParty.

But for all that, given his chance to put his point, he put down the phone in the huff because he sensedhatred. Jeez, the man needs to get out more.

Can you imagine how Alex Salmond would have dealt with that?

To view the original article CLICK HERE albeit an openly stated and obviously partisan commentator!

Clearly FaceBook particularly is an irresponsible host of ‘social media’ and its lack of discernment is self evident from the clear fact that any Tom, Dick, Harry or McTavish who is listed as a follower is glibly described as a friend and all too often Scots seem grossly ill informed of their own history but all too well versed in its mythology believing there is more than a shred of truth in ‘Brave Heart’ a work of pure fiction based on fantasy which puts butts on seats in cinemas!

I well remeber some years ago when Nigel Farage stations one of hs very scarce intelligent staff in Scotland for an election where sshe (Heather Conyngham) was tasked with finding out how politics in Scotland functioned and recruiting candidates to exploit it with her guidance and a very meagre purse! UKIP knew little of politics then and seemingly have forgotten most of what they may have know since!

There is no one of notable abil;ity in UKIP’s team in Scotland bar some fool of a pretend member of The House of Lords and perhaps one could count Malcolm Lord Pearson of Rannoch who not only proved utterly inept as Nigel Farage’s pupopet leaderr during the ‘Berkow’ debacle where Farage did so badlt but also Pearson was exposed as both disloyal and a liar!

Then of course there is the ex army Corporal who takes center stage to make UKIP Scotland a figure of farce with his idiotic misrepresentation of law as a so called ‘freeman of the Land’ of which there is no such legal entity and as a gullible gutter scraper with his utterly corrupt claims of veracity in the fantasies of Anne Greig & Robert Green regarding the febrile tissue of lies they have built around the sad figure of Hollie Greig (for facts and details CLICK HERE) – actions by which he clearly brings UKIP into disrepute on both sides of the Tartan Curtain!

With so little understanding of Scotland and its politics, much of which is based on Scotland’s own fantasy history and a warped understanding of both politics and international commerce; which has driven a bitter wedge of folly and hatred based on envy between Scotland and her allies Farage stood little chance of coming out of his recent misguided foray North unscathed.

I write as one who has both lived and worked in Scotland, where my parental home for over 20 years was Wester Ross!

In future Nigel Farage may care to consider the backdrop to his activities before parading his enactment of a Tory Boy and City slicker on behalf of UKIP north of The Tartan Curtain!

IN LINE WITH OUR POLICY OF ACCURACYI am happy to publish the claim that drawing attention to an article in a registered press outlet I may have, as with 1,000s of others, been misled

After receiving what seems to be something of a rant from someone claiming to be Anna-Marie Crampton which reads as follows:
>>>>Comments written in my name – false. UKIP candidate. CC Election, May 2, 2013

Hi, here is an error for you. I DID NOT write the comments i was accused of by the press and others yourselves included, a vicious character, researcher for The Argus by name Colin Corbus is behind this i believe, and others, and fortunately, underestimated the intelligence of voters, colleagues, friends, family and so on who recognised immediately, that i (aimed at UKIP) was the victim of dirty tricks aimed at quieting me, scaring me and even possibly endangering me, to maintain the status quo and discredit UKIP from the left, right and/or the EU… Clearly they were worried indeed about UKIPs impact and possibly mine too. What they did do was take comments i had made about Zionism as a political movement and twisted, distorted and added to them, having created a ghost FB account (i had no idea existed even till a colleague noticed it). It is not repeat NOT anti semitic to take a view about Zionism as a political movement. Period. Do your research. It is propaganda to suggest otherwise. I have not read your unpleasant comments about me being anti semitic nor will i but, i am informed they are libellous. FYI. Had UKIPs Press Office handled this as they should have more professionally (possibly due to inexperience) and told me that The Argus were about to go to print with libellous “stuff” i was alleged to have written but which rather, was written in my name, which they did NOT incidentally,, then i could have given The Argus my side of the story… they were waiting to hear from me.. only i had been told by UKIP NOT to speak to the press, that the PO would deal with any/all enquiries about candidates of which i was one (originally just paper and my UKIP colleague Sonia Finch and i did not get going as full candidates until late into the campaign). Little did i know what had been written, i knew NOTHING of it… Later, the BBC, Courier and even the nationals gave me a chance to speak up and printed my denial. They in fact, all came to my home to interview me at length which i was happy to do. I did not seek out all this publicity, far from it, but, i had no choice but to deal with it. Since then, my phone line has been tapped, my FB and Twitter are being monitored (I have now closed down my Twitter) and frankly, though i have weathered this vicious attack upon my good name with dignity, helped not least by the full support i have received from my (UKIP) branch at Wealden for which i am most grateful, is it any wonder i have thought long and hard about ever putting myself forward as a candidate again in order to try to support and help my community or country ever again. No wonder so few quality candidates come forward (often women) to stand when as soon as they put their heads above the parapet they are subjected to such venom. Thus, the EU remains in tact and the agenda for a socialist and federalist State of Europe remains too… I have no idea why you are so against UKIP… they aren’t perfect, they have made some mistakes it seems, but, at grassroots level we remain committed to helping our communities and country, by giving local people their power back, referendums at local level, reducing expenditure and so forth. Despite all attempts to discredit me, i went on (along with my UKIP colleague Sonia Finch) to do very well at the CC Election beating both the pro EU parties Labour and Lib Dems by a mile. There is currently a full investigation underway by the police. Thank you.

Anna M Crampton
<<<

The only posting, amongst over 2,000 on this web site, that seems to comment on Ms. Crampton was as follows:
>>>Controversial former Ukip candidate creates music video for the party
This Is Sussex
A UKIP county council candidate who caused controversy over comments on a social media site has made a music video promoting her political beliefs. Crowborough resident Anna Marie Crampton who is standing in the East Sussex County Council …
See all stories on this topic »
This Is Sussex<<<<

sourced from Google alerts and sourced to the publisher!

I am happy to pass on Ms. Crampton’s claims, though I do apologise to any she may have defamed or libelled in her posting and its claims.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

.
PS.:
I trust this helps readers to realise that this web site will take every reasonable step it can to correct both errors of consequence and even possible errors in quotes we have published, giving a right of reply to those willing to provide their accurate name and connection details!