Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death and is characterized by early metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy and irradiation. The identification of deregulated molecular pathways in pancreatic cancer and the development of novel targeted therapies had so far little impact on clinical outcome (1). Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer has remained extremely poor with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. A key event in tumor progression of pancreatic cancer is deregulation of TGF-β signaling (2). Under normal conditions, TGF-β maintains tissue homeostasis by controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, survival, and cell adhesion. Deregulated TGF-β signaling allows tumors to usurp homeostatic effects for promoting tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and tumor angiogenesis (2). Moreover, TGF-β has immunosuppressive effects such as inhibition of cytotoxic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, induction of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, and shifting antigen-presenting cell function toward tolerance (3, 4). Both tumor cells and immune cells, such as regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), contribute to enhanced TGF-β production in patients with cancer. Elevated TGF-β levels in serum and tumors correlate with poor prognosis in patients with tumor (5, 6). Thus, TGF-β has generated interest as a target for novel anticancer agents. Anti-TGF-β compounds have shown efficacy in preclinical studies, and some of these have moved into clinical investigation for melanoma, brain tumors, colorectal, renal, and pancreatic cancer (7–11).

Eukaryotic cells have evolved pattern recognition receptors for the detection of viral nucleic acids to trigger appropriate antiviral immune responses. Four members of the toll-like receptor (TLR) family (TLR3, 7, 8, and 9) are located in the endosomal membrane predominantly in immune cells, whereas the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like helicases RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 (MDA-5) are located in the cytosol of immune and nonimmune cells. Recent work suggests that RIG-I may represent a novel target for cancer immunotherapy (14, 15). RIG-I is a cytosolic sensor of viral RNA detecting a triphosphate group at the 5′ end generated by viral RNA polymerases (16, 17). Upon activation, RIG-I initiates a signaling cascade mediated by IRF-3, IRF-7, and NF-κB, leading to an antiviral response program characterized by the production of type I IFN (IFN-α and IFN-β) and other innate immune response genes, such as the chemokine CXCL10 (18). Moreover, RIG-I signaling induces apoptosis in susceptible cells. In vitro transcribed 5′-triphosphate RNA (ppp-RNA) can be applied as RIG-I ligand to trigger proapoptotic signaling via the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway (14, 15). Of note, RIG-I–mediated apoptosis occurs predominantly in tumor cells, as nonmalignant cells are protected from proapoptotic signaling via Bcl-xL (14).

The novel ppp-siRNA strategy offers the advantage of combining RIG-I–mediated immune activation with RNAi-mediated gene silencing within a single molecule. In the study by Poeck and colleagues, a bifunctional ppp-siRNA silencing the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2 resulted in efficient tumor cell apoptosis in melanoma (15). To date, little is known about RIG-I expression in other cancer types. We hypothesized that dual targeting of immunosuppression via RIG-I activation and TGF-β silencing promotes efficacy against pancreatic cancer. We studied RIG-I expression and signaling in human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. In addition, the therapeutic efficacy of a bifunctional ppp-siRNA combining ppp-RNA–mediated RIG-I signaling with siRNA-mediated TGF-β silencing was assessed in the aggressive Panc02 mouse model of pancreatic carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and cytokine stimulation

The Panc02 cell line was established from a tumor that was induced by 3-methylcholanthren in the pancreas of C57BL/6 mice and was a kind gift of Prof. Christiane Bruns (Chirurgische Klinik, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany; ref. 19). The human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines PANC-1, MIAPaCa-2, and BxPC-3 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were used within 6 months after resuscitation (ATCC). PaTu8988t cell line was obtained from the German Collection of Cell Lines (DSMZ). IMIM-PC1 was kindly provided by Prof. Patrick Michl (Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; ref. 20). Cancer cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco BRL), 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 100 U/L penicillin, and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin (PAA). Each cell line was routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination by MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (LONZA). IFN-α was used at concentrations of 1,000 IU/mL for murine and 100 IU/mL for human cell lines (Miltenyi).

siRNAs and transfection

siRNAs against TGF-β1, RIG-I, Puma, and Noxa were designed according to published guidelines and were purchased from Eurofins MWG Operon (21). The matching 5′-triphosphate–modified siRNA was transcribed using the correlating DNA template that contained the T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence. In vitro transcription of ppp-RNA was done using the MEGAshortscript T7 Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's protocol (14, 15). All sequences can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Tumor cells were transfected with siRNA in OptiMEM (Gibco, BRL) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). For in vivo administration, 50 μg of RNA was complexed with in vivo-JetPEI (Peqlab) at an N/P ratio of 6 in 5% glucose solution for tail vein injection.

Mice, tumor engraftment, and therapy

Six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Harlan-Winkelmann, Trif−/− and Tlr7−/− mice in a F6 C57BL/6 background originated from S. Akira (Department of Host Defense, Osaka University, Japan) and B. Beutler (Center for the Genetics of Host Defense, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; refs. 22, 23). Experiments were carried out according to ethical guidelines approved by the local government. Orthotopic tumors were induced by surgical implantation of 2 × 105 Panc02 cells into the pancreas as described (24). Therapy started on day 10, when sacrificed control mice showed visible tumor nodules (5–8 mm diameter), and was administered twice weekly over 3 weeks. Serum was obtained 6 hours after the first RNA injection for cytokine analysis, and 48 hours after second and fifth injections for TGF-β measurement. Survival of mice was monitored daily. Distressed mice were sacrificed. Where indicated, CD8+ T cells or NK cells were depleted one day before RNA treatment with 500 μg of anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody (mAb; clone YTS 169.4) or anti-NK1.1 mAb (clone PK136; BioXCell). Depletion efficacy was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of peripheral blood and was more than 98% after 24 hours.

Protein preparation and Western blot analysis

Tumor tissue was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized using mortar and pestle under constant liquid nitrogen cooling. Cells were lysed (Bio-Plex Cell Lysis Kit, Bio-Rad) and protein concentrations of supernatants were analyzed by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) and adjusted for whole protein concentration. For Western blotting, cells were lysed in Laemmli buffer and boiled for 10 minutes. Cell lysates were separated using a 10% SDS-PAGE. RIG-I was detected with anti-RIG-I mAb (clone ALME-1, ENZO Life Sciences GmbH) followed by horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Anti-pIRF-3 mAb was from New England BioLabs. Blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (GE Healthcare).

Detection of apoptosis

Apoptosis was determined using Annexin V-APC (Invitrogen) and propidium iodide staining by flow cytometry. Activation of caspase-9 in tumor cells was analyzed by flow cytometry using the caspase-9 and caspase-3/7 FLICA Kits (Immunochemistry, Biomol). Caspase-9 Western blot analysis was done using mouse anti-caspase-9 mAb detecting both the proform and active form (New England Biolabs GmbH). Activated caspase-9 in tumor lysates was quantified by colorimetric analysis using the Caspase-9 Activity Detection Kit (Abcam). TUNEL staining was conducted using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche) and mounted with Vectashield w/DAPI (Vector Laboratories) for nuclei visualization. Stained tissues were visualized by confocal fluorescence microscopy (Leica TCS SP5).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total mRNA was isolated using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was transcribed using Protoscript First Strand DNA Synthesis Kit (New England BioLabs). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted using the LC 480 Probes Master Kit and Light Cycler 480 instrument (Roche Diagnostics). Primers were designed with the Universal Probes library (Roche). The copy numbers of each sample were correlated to hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase.

Histology

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was conducted according to common protocols. For immunohistology, paraffin-embedded specimens were cut at 3 μm. After deparaffinization and rehydration, heat pretreatment was done with ProTaqs V Antigen Enhancer (Quartett, Immunodiagnostika & Biotechnologie GmbH). The staining was conducted using mouse anti-RIG-I mAb (Enzo Life Sciences AG). Detection was accomplished by Real Detection System APAAP (Dako) and counter stained with haematoxylin Gill's Formula (Vector Laboratories). Lymphocyte infiltrates in Panc02 tumors were analyzed with mAb anti-CD3 (clone 17A2) and anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.7, all BD Pharmingen). Images were obtained by fluorescence microscopy (Axiovert 2000, Carl Zeiss) and processed with Adobe Photoshop CS4 for adjustment of contrast and size.

Results

Pancreatic carcinoma cells express functional RIG-I

RIG-I expression was studied in human PanIN lesions, primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and metastases by immunohistochemistry. We found strong cytosolic staining for RIG-I in premalignant lesions and in tumor cells in 10 of 10 specimens (Supplementary Fig. S1). We also assessed RIG-I expression by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis in various human pancreatic cancer cell lines, including PANC-1, PaTu8988t, MIAPaCa-2, IMIM-PC-1, and BxPC-3 that were cultured in the absence or presence of IFN-α. All human pancreatic cancer cell lines tested expressed basal levels of RIG-I protein that were upregulated upon IFN-α treatment (Fig. 1A). We next assessed RIG-I signaling in pancreatic cancer cells in response to treatment with the RIG-I ligand ppp-RNA. We observed phosphorylation of the nuclear transcription factor IRF-3 in all cell lines (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, RIG-I stimulation induced the secretion of CXCL10 (IP-10) and IFN-β (Fig. 1C and D). The cell line MIAPaCa-2 lacked IFN-β production due to a deletion of the IFN-β gene (25) but showed IRF-3 phosphorylation and secreted CXCL10, indicative of intact RIG-I signaling. In addition, FACS analysis revealed upregulation of MHC-I surface expression in all cell lines (Fig. 1E). To confirm that these effects were mediated by RIG-I, we silenced RIG-I in PANC-1 cells with siRNA before ppp-RNA stimulation. Phosphorylation of IRF-3, CXCL10 secretion, and MHC-I expression were significantly reduced in RIG-I–silenced cells (Fig. 1F and G). Together, these data show that human pancreatic cancer cells express functional RIG-I and validate RIG-I as a potential therapeutic target.

Human pancreatic cancer cells express functional RIG-I. A, different human pancreatic cancer cell lines were cultured in the absence or presence of 100 IU/mL IFN-α or 1 μg/mL ppp-RNA for 12 hours. Expression of RIG-I protein was determined by Western blot analysis. B, tumor cells were stimulated with ppp-RNA (1 μg/mL) for 2 hours and phosphorylated IRF-3 (pIRF-3) was assessed by Western blot analysis. C–E, pancreatic cancer cells were treated with 1 μg/mL OH-RNA or ppp-RNA for 24 hours. Release of CXCL10 (C) and IFN-β (D) was measured by ELISA. E, MHC-I surface expression was measured by flow cytometry. MHC-I expression levels are shown as fold increase compared with cells treated with control OH-RNA. F, PANC-1 cells were incubated with irrelevant (Ctrl.) or RIG-I–specific siRNA for 24 hours and subsequently stimulated with OH-RNA or ppp-RNA (1 μg/mL) for 2 hours. pIRF-3 was assessed by Western blot analysis. Efficiency of RIG-I silencing was assessed by Western blot analysis. G, PANC-1 cells were incubated with irrelevant (Ctr.) or RIG-I–specific siRNA for 24 hours and subsequently stimulated with 1 μg/mL OH-RNA or ppp-RNA. CXCL10 levels and MHC-I expression were analyzed after an additional 24 hours. Mean + SD from triplicates of 1 of 3 and representative images of 3 independent experiments are shown. *, P < 0.05.

We next investigated RIG-I expression in the murine pancreatic carcinoma cell line Panc02, which forms highly aggressive tumors in C57BL/6 mice. RIG-I expression was low in Panc02 cells under basal conditions but strongly upregulated upon IFN-α treatment (Fig. 2A). As observed with human cell lines, treatment with ppp-RNA resulted in the phosphorylation of IRF-3 as well as secretion of CXCL10 and IFN-β and upregulation of MHC-I expression (Fig. 2B and C). Again, RIG-I silencing confirmed the critical role of RIG-I signaling for these effects (Fig. 2D). Thus, the Panc02 model enabled us to study the therapeutic potential of ppp-RNAs in vivo in immunocompetent mice.

Murine Panc02 pancreatic carcinoma cells express functional RIG-I. A, Panc02 cells were cultured in the absence or presence of 1,000 IU/mL IFN-α for 12 hours. Expression of RIG-I was determined by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis. B, phosphorylation of IRF-3 was assessed by Western blot analysis after treatment with OH-RNA or ppp-RNA (1 μg/mL) for 2 hours. C, Panc02 cells were stimulated with 1 μg/mL OH-RNA, ppp-RNA, or left untreated for 24 hours. CXCL10 and IFN-β secretion were analyzed by ELISA. MHC-I surface expression was measured by flow cytometry and was expressed as fold increase compared with untreated cells. D, Panc02 cells were incubated with irrelevant (Ctrl.) or RIG-I–specific siRNA for 24 hours and subsequently stimulated with OH-RNA or ppp-RNA. CXCL10 levels in supernatants were measured by ELISA and MHC-I expression by flow cytometry. Mean + SD from triplicates of 1 of 3 independent experiments. *, P < 0.05.

RIG-I signaling induces apoptosis in pancreatic carcinoma cells

In previous studies, RIG-I signaling was shown to induce apoptosis in melanoma cells via the intrinsic, caspase-9–dependent pathway involving upregulation of the proapoptotic BH3-only proteins Noxa and Puma (14, 15). We next assessed whether this proapoptotic pathway is also active in pancreatic cancer cells. Treatment with ppp-RNA strongly induced apoptosis in both human and murine pancreatic carcinoma cells as determined by PARP cleavage (data not shown) and Annexin V binding, which was strongly reduced in RIG-I–silenced tumor cells (Fig. 3A and B). In line with activation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, we observed activation of caspase-9 and caspases 3/7 (Fig. 3C and D). Moreover, ppp-RNA induced upregulation of Puma and Noxa in pancreatic cancer cells (Fig. 3E). Interestingly, siRNA-mediated silencing of Puma significantly inhibited apoptosis induction. Together, these results show that pancreatic cancer cells are sensitive to proapoptotic RIG-I signaling and confirm a role of proapoptotic BH3-only proteins in RIG-I–induced apoptosis.

To assess whether RIG-I activation and RNAi-mediated silencing of TGF-β can be combined in a single molecule, we designed a siRNA-targeting TGF-β1 and the corresponding ppp-siRNA by in vitro transcription using a DNA template of the same sequence containing the T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence (16). Unmodified siRNA carrying a free 5′-OH group (OH-TGF-β) and ppp-modified siRNA (ppp-TGF-β) reduced TGF-β to a similar extent in Panc02 cells on mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 4A). Thus, silencing activity was not impeded by the ppp modification. Moreover, ppp-TGF-β induced upregulation of CXCL10, IFN-β, and MHC-I as well as apoptosis of Panc02 cells to a similar extent as control ppp-RNA (Fig. 4B–D). Of note, silencing of TGF-β with OH-TGF-β by itself had no influence on the viability of Panc02 cells. Similar results were obtained with a ppp-siRNA–targeting TGF-β in human PANC-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, ppp-TGF-β effectively combines RNAi-mediated TGF-β silencing with ppp-RNA–mediated RIG-I activation in pancreatic cancer cells.

Bifunctional ppp-siRNA directed against TGF-β1 combines gene silencing with RIG-I signaling. Panc02 cells were incubated with different RNAs (0.5 μg/mL) with or without silencing activity against TGF-β for 24 hours or left untreated. A, TGF-β levels were analyzed by qRT-PCR and ELISA. B, CXCL10 was measured in supernatants by ELISA and IFN-β expression by qRT-PCR. MHC-I expression (C) and viability (D) were assessed by flow cytometry. Mean + SD from triplicates of 1 of 3 independent experiments. *, P < 0.05.

Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with ppp-TGF-β leads to immune activation and TGF-β silencing in vivo

Next, we examined the immunostimulatory activity of ppp-TGF-β in the Panc02 pancreatic cancer model. Ten days after orthotopic tumor induction, mice were treated intravenously with RNAs, and cytokine production was measured in serum. Injection of ppp-RNA and ppp-TGF-β induced high serum levels of CXCL10, IFN-α, and moderate levels of TNF-α (Fig. 5A). In addition, we observed a potent systemic immune activation as evidenced by a strong upregulation of CD69 expression on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, as well as NK and natural killer T cells (NKT; NK1.1+/CD3+) (Fig. 5B). Of note, intermediate levels of immune activation were also observed for siRNA against TGF-β. However, these were strongly reduced in TLR7−/− mice, indicative of a previously described off-target effect of unmodified siRNA (Supplementary Fig. S3; 26, 27). In contrast, immune activation in response to ppp-TGF-β treatment was not affected in mice lacking either TLR7 or TRIF (TLR3 signaling).

Bifunctional ppp-siRNA targeting TGF-β1 induces systemic immune activation and gene silencing in vivo. On day 10 after Panc02 tumor induction, mice were injected with 50 μg of the indicated RNAs complexed with in vivo jetPEI via the tail vein. A, CXCL10, IFN-α, and TNF-α serum levels were analyzed by ELISA after 6 hours. B, CD69 expression by splenic lymphocyte populations was determined by flow cytometry after 12 hours. C, percentage and caspase-9 activation of CD11b+ Gr-1+ MDSC were measured by flow cytometry after 12 hours. D, TGF-β serum levels in mice during Panc02 tumor progression on days 0, 14, and 25 after tumor induction. E, influence of treatment with RNAs with and without TGF-β silencing activity on TGF-β serum levels at days 14 and 25. Mice were treated twice weekly and serum was taken 48 hours after the second and fifth RNA injections. Pooled data of 3 to 7 mice per group are shown as mean + SEM. *, P < 0.05.

A hallmark of pancreatic cancer is the expansion of MDSCs that effectively suppresses CD8+ T cell responses (28–30). Both, TGF-β blockade and type I IFN have been reported to reduce the suppressive function of MDSC (31, 32). We therefore investigated the effect of ppp-TGF-β treatment on MDSC in spleens of mice with Panc02 tumors. Strikingly, we observed a reduction in CD11b+ Gr-1+ MDSC numbers by 50%. This reduction was due to increased apoptosis of MDSC, as shown by enhanced caspase-9 activation (Fig. 5C). A similar trend was observed for OH-TGF-β, but lacked significance. Furthermore, ppp-TGF-β induced a shift from Ly6G+ PMN-MDSC to Ly6C+ monocytic MDSC and upregulation of CD11c, CD80, and Sca-1 expression (Supplementary Fig. S4). Similar phenotypic changes of MDSC have been found in tumor-bearing mice treated with a TLR9 ligand or recombinant IFN-α and were associated with a reduced suppressive function (32).

High serum levels of TGF-β correlate with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer (33). We previously reported elevated TGF-β serum levels in mice with Panc02 tumors (34). To document the influence of Panc02 tumors on TGF-β serum levels, we analyzed serum samples on days 0, 14, and 25 after tumor induction. TGF-β serum levels were increased in tumor-bearing animals and correlated with tumor burden (Fig. 5D). In vivo administration of both, OH-TGF-β or ppp-TGF-β, significantly reduced serum TGF-β levels in mice with early- and late-stage pancreatic tumors (Fig. 5E). Together, these results confirm the in vivo activity of ppp-TGF-β in regards to systemic TGF-β silencing and RIG-I activation in mice with orthotopic pancreatic cancer.

Treatment with ppp-TGF-β induces tumor cell apoptosis in vivo and prolongs survival of mice with Panc02 tumors in a CD8+ T cell–dependent manner. A–C, mice with Panc02 tumors were treated with 50 μg of the indicated RNA on days 12 and 14 after tumor induction. Tumors were removed on day 15 for ex vivo analysis using H&E staining (A) and TUNEL staining (B) for detecting apoptotic tumor cells (green) in cryosections of tumor tissue. Nuclei were stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; blue). Representative pictures of 5 tumors per group. C, caspase-9 activity in tumor tissue was assessed by colorimetric analysis. D, number and CD69 expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells as assessed by histology and flow cytometry, respectively. Data represent mean + SEM from 5 mice. *, P < 0.05. E, survival of mice with orthotopic Panc02 tumors treated with RNA twice weekly for 3 weeks was monitored. Treatment started on day 10 after tumor induction. Experiments were terminated after 100 days (all surviving mice were tumor-free). Pooled data with statistical analysis from 4 independent experiments with 9 to 20 mice per group are depicted. F, survival of mice with orthotopic Panc02 tumors treated with RNA in the absence or presence of depleting mAb against CD8 or NK1.1 was monitored. Data from 5 mice per group with statistical analysis are depicted.

Finally, we assessed the in vivo efficacy of ppp-TGF-β treatment in regards to survival in mice with orthotopic Panc02 tumors. We treated mice with RNAs twice weekly for 3 weeks, starting on day 10 after tumor induction. All mice without treatment or treated with nonsilencing OH-RNA had to be sacrificed because of progressive tumor growth within 40 days after tumor induction (median survival 31 and 29 days, respectively). Treatment with OH-TGF-β or ppp-RNA without silencing activity significantly prolonged survival (median survival 43 and 39 days, respectively). Most efficient tumor control was achieved by bifunctional ppp-TGF-β with a median survival time of 49 days (OH-RNA vs. ppp-TGF-β < 0.0001; OH-TGF-β vs. ppp-TGF-β < 0.05)). Complete tumor regressions, confirmed at autopsy on day 100 after tumor induction, were 0%, 6%, and 33% for OH-RNA, ppp-RNA, OH-TGF-β, and ppp-TGF-β, respectively (Fig. 7E).

Increased infiltrations of tumors with activated CD8+ T cells led us to hypothesize that long-term tumor regression induced by ppp-TGF-β treatment may reflect the induction of an adaptive immunoresponse against Panc02 tumor cells. We therefore analyzed the role of CD8+ T cells as well as NK cells in the treatment response by injecting either α-CD8 or α-NK1.1 depleting mAb before RNA therapy. Depletion of CD8+ T cells substantially reduced the therapeutic efficacy of ppp-TGF-β, whereas depletion of NK cells had no major effect on tumor control in this model (Fig. 7F). Thus, CD8+ T cells seem to be the main effector cells for ppp-TGF-β–induced tumor control.

We next evaluated toxicity of RNA treatment by monitoring blood cell counts, creatinine, urea, lactate dehydrogenase, and alanine aminotransferase serum levels. We observed a transient leukopenia in mice treated with either OH-TGF-β or ppp-TGF-β, which was completely reversible within 48 hours. No obvious signs of therapy-associated distress or organ toxicity were detected by serum chemistry or histopathology (Supplementary Fig. S5 anddata not shown).

Discussion

Sequence-specific degradation of viral RNA by RNAi and innate antiviral responses upon detection of viral nucleic acids by pattern recognition receptors, such as RIG-I, are 2 major antiviral defense mechanisms preceding the development of an adaptive immunoresponse. The requirements for the elimination of virus-infected cells and tumor cells share many features. Here, we use both antiviral principles for the therapy of pancreatic cancer. We show that functional RIG-I is expressed in human pancreatic cancer cells. Furthermore, a designed RNA molecule to conduct both RIG-I activation and silencing of the immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-β induced tumor regression in a CD8+ T cell–dependent manner in an aggressive mouse model of pancreatic cancer. In this respect, RNA molecules that contained either the RIG-I ligand motif or the silencing capability alone were less effective supporting the concept that bifunctional siRNA is superior for effective tumor therapy.

A major hurdle in cancer immunotherapy is the profoundimmunosuppression, both systemically and locally within the tumor microenvironment. RIG-I signaling leads to type I IFN responses with IFN-dependent gene products triggering innate and adaptive immunoresponses (18). These effects include systemic activation of NK cells and T cells, as well as activation of dendritic cells, which are critical for the induction and regulation of adaptive immunoresponses and play a key role in cancer immune surveillance (35). It is important to note that upon RIG-I activation, type I IFN not only derives from immune cells but also from tumor tissue, as shown for human and murine pancreatic cancer cells in our work. Secretion of CXCL10 can attract lymphocytes to tumor tissue, and locally produced IFN-β can activate TH1 responses and tumor-infiltrating CTL thus enhancing their killing function. In this respect, upregulation of MHC-I expression by the tumor cells upon RIG-I activation may promote CTL-mediated tumor recognition and killing. In fact, we observed that treatment with ppp-TGF-β resulted in a TH1 cytokine profile in tumor tissue and a more vigorous tumor infiltration with activated CD8+ T cells. In addition, we found that tumor regression in response to ppp-TGF-β treatment was mediated by CD8+ T cells. This leads to the question of how ppp-TGF-β restored CD8+ T cell responses in tumors.

Soluble factors, such as TGF-β (5, 6), and immune cell populations, such as MDSCs and regulatory T cells, have been shown to play immunosuppressive roles in pancreatic cancer (30, 36). In our study, treatment with ppp-TGF-β effectively reduced TGF-β levels in both serum and tumors. The frequency of regulatory T cells was not influenced, however, we have previously reported that TGF-β silencing results in a marked downregulation of CD103 expression on regulatory T cells (37). As CD103 identifies a particularly suppressive subtype of regulatory T cells, treatment with ppp-TGF-β may counteract regulatory T cell–mediated CTL suppression. In addition, we observed that ppp-TGF-β significantly reduced the numbers of CD11b+ Gr-1+ MDSCs. Because MDSCs are frequently found in pancreatic cancer tissue and potently suppress CD8+ T cells, this finding is particularly interesting (36). Moreover, MDSC underwent phenotypic changes, such as upregulation of CD11c, CD80, and Sca-1 expression. Interestingly, similar changes in MDSC have been reported in tumor-bearing mice treated with recombinant IFN-α and were found to correlate with a reduced T cell–suppressive function (32). Thus, TGF-β silencing and type I IFN induction induced by ppp-TGF-β seem to have additive effects on breaking the immunosuppressive milieu created by pancreatic cancer cells and are capable of tipping the balance toward effective antitumor CTL responses.

A central aspect of ppp-RNA treatment is the induction of tumor cell apoptosis. Pancreatic cancer cells frequently acquire loss-of-function mutations of the gatekeeper protein p53, which reduces their sensitivity toward proapoptotic signals (38). An elegant strategy to circumvent this limitation is the exploitation of p53-independent apoptosis induction. We found that pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, including those with p53 mutations (PANC-1, BxPC-3, and MIAPaCa-2), were sensitive to ppp-RNA–mediated apoptosis. In line with findings in melanoma (14), we found that ppp-RNA triggers apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway in pancreatic cancer cells involving upregulation of the BH3-only proteins Noxa and Puma with subsequent caspase-9 activation. Moreover, systemic treatment with ppp-TGF-β induced profound tumor cell apoptosis in vivo, whereas normal pancreas (as well as other organs, such as liver, kidney, and lung) showed no signs of histopathology. These findings confirm previous reports that tumor cells are highly susceptible to ppp-RNA–induced apoptosis (14). The predilection for tumor cells as compared with healthy tissue is critical for avoiding toxicity and provides a therapeutic window for ppp-RNA treatment.

In conclusion, we identified RIG-I as a novel target for immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer. Combining RIG-I activation with TGF-β silencing via bifunctional ppp-siRNA breaks tumor-mediated immunosuppressive mechanisms and confers potent antitumor efficacy. Whether this strategy can be further improved, for example, by combination with cytotoxic agents or immunization, is the focus of ongoing studies. Further improvement can be expected by designing new delivery systems for selective tumor targeting and by assessment in genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic cancer, which allow studying effects on the tumor stromal compartment and metastatic spreading (39, 40).

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (Max Eder Research Grant to M.R. Stieg.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHN 664/3-1 to M.R. Stieg, and GK 1202 to M.R. Stieg, S. Endres, and Hans-Joachim Anders, and GK 1202 student grants to J. Ellermeier, P. Duewell, M.R. Stieg, and T. Adunka.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Robert Besch for advice in siRNA design and critical reading of the manuscript and Andrea Sendelhofert for conducting histopathology. This work is part of the theses of Jonathan Ellermeier, Mareike R. Stieg, and Tina Adunka at the University of Munich.

Footnotes

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

.
Gene deletion chemoselectivity: codeletion of the genes for p16(INK4), methylthioadenosine phosphorylase, and the alpha- and beta-interferons in human pancreatic cell carcinoma lines and its implications for chemotherapy.
Cancer Res1996;56:1083–90.