Monday, December 31, 2012

Being passed off as a factual
documentary, a Muslim-owned company in the Middle East
is planning an epic movie project on Mohammad and his life – and is expecting
to spend $1 billion to get it finished.
I wonder if they will show the part where he was a pedophile. Probably not…

Gulf
News, this movie
was launched by United Arab
Emirates businessman Abdullah Abulhoul. The site serves as a media portal now for the
Al Nisr Group.

According to the
report out of Al Manamah the capital of Bahrain,
the project is being produced by Doha,
Qatar, based Al
Noor Holdings.

The announcement
said the media company has confirmed endorsements from prominent Islamic
scholars such as Yusuf al Qaradawi, the chief of the International Union of
Muslim Scholars. The movie is to be made
in several parts and is to be “produced according to the highest
international standards using the most sophisticated technical and audio-visual
systems.”

Al Noor officials confirmed
earlier “they were facing challenges because of the difficulty of correctly
portraying Muhammad and his consorts while still observing Shariah.” Yeah!
I bet they were…“This is why we have consulted manyfamous
Islamic scholars … who will guide us on the Shariah aspect of the film,”
Al Noor Holdings confirmed in a statement.

The price of the
movie is perhaps the most unusual aspect.
Although accounting in Hollywood
makes it unclear exactly how much movie projects always cost, there are reports
that Spider-Man 3 cost 258 million, most are around 100 million.

One of the issues
that had to be resolved was that the Islamic world disallows representations of
Muhammad’s companions, but Al Qaradawi said he asked around. “I have come to the conclusion that there
was nothing wrong with showing the companions in dramatic work,” he
told GulfNews. “There is no text or reference in the Quran or in the prophet’s
tradition and sayings that does not allow it.” This typifies the Islamic religion; the Grand
Mufti proclaims a fatwa of convenience, Muhammad himself did this many times
contradicting the Quran. But let an infidel
portray Muhammad in a “dramatic work” and all Hell will
break loose. Plans are for the movie to
be made in English, but with translations to several other languages.

The American side
of the Islamic world, embodied in the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR,
(a known Islamic terrorist fund raising organization receiving support from the
American Federal Government) said “the project would hold special significance
because it will address the negative impressions of Islam”. This is Islam speak for… it will hold special significance because it
will really deceive the world about what Islam is.

Nihad Awad of the
Council on American-Islamic Relations said some 750 movies with negative
messages about Islam or Mohammad were produced by Hollywood in the last decade. Yes!
But were these negative messages ‘true’?

THE
BOTTOM LINE: If you choose to view this
movie, if and when, it hits American theaters, be aware that there is no truth
in Islam. Moreover this will be portrayed
as the true life of Muhammad but is designed to be nothing more than a
propaganda effort to support the current spell of deception that the world is already
experiencing. This deception is supported
partly because the Ten Commandments of God has been removed from the public forum
and replaced with Sharia law of Satan!

This is nothing but a modern attempt of World Jihad (the struggle to
win the world for Allah/Satan). Don’t be
ignorant, don’t be deceived or you will be part of the enablement of the destruction
of our own American freedom and Judeo Christian culture of Liberty in Jesus
Christ the Son of the real living God. The
First Commandment in Exodus 20:2-6 (WEB)
says: “I am
Yahweh your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt,
out of the house of bondage. You shall
have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourselves an idol, nor
any image of anything that is in the heavens above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: you shall not bow yourself
down to them, nor serve them, for I, Yahweh your God, am a jealous God,
visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third
and on the fourth generation of those who hate me, and showing loving kindness
to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.” Thanks for
listening – de Andréa

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Texas public school curriculum is now
teaching students "Allah is the Almighty God," which is beginning to
catch the attention of critics. The
creators of that curriculum, however, claim critics are taking information out
of context. In what context could Satan ever be God?

By de Andréa

December 30, 2012

I can’t decide which
is the most dangerous, the loss of our Second Amendment rights, or the
brain-washing of our children with the lies of Islam in public schools. It probably doesn’t matter since both’ will
eventually destroy everything’ we hold dear.
That’s everything my friend!

Obama’s Communist Islamic private brain-washing
propaganda curriculum, CSCOPE, is now being
used in 70 percent of Texas K-12 public school classes. The "comprehensive, customized,
user-friendly curriculum support system" was developed in cooperation with
the Department of Education and the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum
Collaborative as an experiment. This, or
something like this, will shortly creep into all American schools Nation wide.

But critics like Ginger Russell,
are finding that the program teaches, "Allah alone is
the Creator"as
fact…and without any opposing viewpoint.

"They had a PowerPoint presentation there on
Islam, and it did say that, -- that 'Allah is the Almighty God,'" Russell accounts. "It
doesn't give any controversial view to it, or disprove of that."

In addition, portions of the Quran are
handed out to children to accompany the PowerPoint presentation, according to
Russell.

"The lesson that went with this PowerPoint
asked you to hand out the verses of the Quran to the kids to go over," the critic reports.

CSCOPE, which is independent of the
Texas State Board of Education, also teaches that the Boston Tea Party was carried out by a
band of terrorists and that the Second Amendment,contrary to a supreme court ruling, is limited to
state-run organizations,a typical
tyrannical philosophy.

But because the program operates
outside the board of education, public review of the content is not permitted. Even parents are denied access to this online
program.

CSCOPE claims that accusations its
curriculum promotes "Allah is the Almighty God" are inaccurate and "taken
out of context.” My brain is
itching trying to imagine in what context is Allah properly portrayed as God,
none - except in Satan’s Quran, he has always wanted to be’ God. Don’t send your kids to a school where you are not allowed to view the curricula.

As for the Boston Tea Party
example, CSCOPE says the
writer of that lesson -- meant to "engage students with an activity on
perspective, over the topic of terrorism" and to demonstrate "how
an act of patriotism to Americans could be perceived differently by an outside
party ....” Who bloody cares how
others perceive our patriotism! What
they are really saying here is…”How ‘Islam’
perceives our patriotism”. Americans
shouldn’t care how Islam perceives anything.
This is what is contributing to our downfall, trying to be friends with
the Devil.

THE BOTTOM LINE:
So’, Islam perceives our fight for freedom as an act of terrorism, and
we should be understanding??? We should
teach our kids this garbage? The only
thing we need to understand about Islam is that it is a deception of the worst kind;
it is the religion from Hell. Moreover,
that Allah is certainly not God in any context…Allah is in ‘real fact’, none
other than ‘Satan’, the Devil himself, who has disguised himself as a serpent
in Eden then as an angel sent from God in Mecca, and now Allah disguises himself
as God Himself in the Judeo Christian West.

Our children’s heads are full of
oatmeal; it is a big responsibility as to what we do with that oatmeal. So far, the illegal Department of Education,
as well as our State and local school districts, have been irresponsible. They are more interested in making nice with
the enemies of God and of this Nation than they are in teaching the truth and
origin of freedom and the liberty of God, the real God. Allah/Satan
has deceived a nation, ‘and’… he has deceived the world.

Because of our Ignorance and lack
understanding of who and what Islam really is, we as a nation are deceived and
will allow the sacrifice of our kids heads full of mush to enable and
perpetuate the lie of Islam until the Judeo Christian Nation of America will
not even be a memory. The history of
freedom and Christianity will be nothing but fiction.

If you can’t see this coming down the
road, then it’s because you are blind Ignorant and deceived. By the time you become aware of this, it will
already be too late. The time to wake-up
is now my friend! Don’t sacrifice your children’s
future to the Devil…

Saturday, December 29, 2012

While 61 percent of
the nation is swinging toward some kind of armed security in schools, the
Communist haters of children that would just as soon kill them all, ‘before
birth’ - are trying to lead us down a path of false security and certain destruction,
all in the name of safety. Sounds
Hitleresque to me!

New York’s Mayor,
Michael Bloomberg for example lives in a fairy tale world… a place of make
believe where Communist dictators direct every aspect of citizens’ lives … from
what and how much they are allowed to
eat and/or drink, to what they can
legally own, to what they can even think.

Mayor Bloomberg
said over the weekend that President Obama should bypass Congress and by EXECUTIVE ORDER,
take [dictatorial] action on gun control or thousands of people will die. He even named a number: 48,000 people: “If
he does nothing during his second term, something like 48,000 Americans will be
killed with illegal guns.” Has
he lost his mind? The reason why
thousands of Americans are dying is because in many cases the crazies like
Bloomberg are the only ones that are armed.
Since its gun ban in 1994, the UK’s death rate do to violent gun
crime has doubled, look it up, it is now in the millions per year, all in a GUN
FREE COUNTRY! How do you think that’s
working out for them? Not to bloody good I’d say!

Why is no one
looking into Bloomberg’s mental stability?
First let’s examine some of the phrases he uses: “Bypass Congress.” “Executive Orders.” It seems to me that Bloomberg’s view of the America
Presidency is more like a Communist Dictatorship rather than an elected President
of a Republic. Of course, Bloomberg
knows the only way dictators can rule people is to take away their ability to
rise up and fight back against tyranny, he must have read Mien Kampf, that’s
how Hitler did it, incidentally, he was considered crazy too.

NY Governor Andrew
M. Cuomo said Thursday that he had started discussions with leaders of the
State Legislature about new gun control measures, and that he planned to
propose a package of gun legislation in his State of the State address on Jan.
9.

The New York
Assembly, controlled by Democrats, has voted for a number of proposed gun
control measures in recent years, only to have the legislation falter in the
Senate, which has been controlled by Republicans. (Starting next month, the Senate is to be led
by a coalition of Republicans and a breakaway faction of Democrats.) NY, second only to Illinois
in gun control laws, is ironically also second in gun murders right after Illinois who is number
one. Are these people in addition to
being mentally impaired, also deaf, dumb, and blind?

In the interview,
Mr. Cuomo did not offer specifics about the measures he might propose, but,
while discussing assault weapons, he said:“Confiscation could be an option.
Mandatory sale to the state could be an option.Permitting could be an option — keep your
gun, but permit it.”

The mere idea that
the New York
government could confiscate private, legally owned property that one does have
a constitutional right to own is bad enough.
Cuomo, however seems to think this is actually within his power to do
so…

Sen.Dianne Feinstein(D-Calif.)—author
of the original federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of
1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd—
she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinsteinsaid,“I
have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation”and
“It will be carefully focused.”
Indicating the depth of her research on the issue, shesaidon Dec. 21stthat
she had “personally looked at PICTURES of guns
in 1993, and again in 2012.”

Oh! Well…Di-Fi looked at pictures…Twice! It is so comforting to have a brain-dead
expert in government making illegal unconstitutional laws banning guns who has
looked at pictures of guns. I have
personally looked at pictures of the human brain…at least twice, maybe a
hundred times; by Feinstein’s sick logic, that makes me a brain surgeon. I think Di-Fi would be hard pressed to decide
which end the bullet comes out of an assault rifle. I know she may at least know which end the
bullet comes out of a revolver because she carries one. Kind of hypocritical don’t you think! Incidentally
the ColumbineHigh School shooting took place in April
of 1999, right smack dab in the middle of Di-Fi’s first “Assault Weapons
Ban”. Oh well… crazy people always want
to do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.

Di-Fi’s
new Gun
Ban that she plans to introduce on
January 3rd 2013 expands the definition of “assault
weapon” by including: Three very popular rifles: The American M1 Carbine
(introduced in 1944 and for many years it was sold by the federal government to
individuals, a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the Russian
SKS. I may shortly become a felon along
with approximately 68 percent of all Americans.
“Laws don’t prevent crime they create criminals” de Andréa
December 2012.

The new law will ban any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or
rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than
10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.

Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an
overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed
magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any
semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel. The bill goes on, and on, and on, creating a
whole new category of criminal, called a “constitutional criminal”. One who is protected by the US Constitution but
is condemned by illegal national laws. It bans every gun except the assault weapon
she has carried for nearly 20 years, a 38 revolver. But of course she needs a weapon, because her
life is worth more than your life, or the life of your children.

The new National gun ban will require owners of existing
“assault weapons” to register them with the federal government under the
National Firearms Act (NFA). This is of course
so the BATF can come to your front door with or without a warrant and
confiscate your constitutionally protected arms, nearly guaranteeing the
ability of the new National Dictatorship to enact the new martial law, and if
by magic, over night, we will have instant tyranny.

The bill would also include a requirement
that all gun owners to be fingerprinted.
Well, there is much more to the story.
The handguns mentioned were pretty specific and if this bill is passed,
you can say “Goodbye” to purchasing a new Glock, Sig Sauer, Smith & Wesson,
M&P, H&K, or Colt among other name brands.

Certain other semiautomatic
rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable
magazine and have one military characteristic.

I point this out because most in the
line of the above mentioned brands fit the criteria outlined in this bill. Additionally, you’ll notice it isn’t just
assault weapons or even semi-automatic handguns Feinstein mentions. Included are shotguns with detachable
magazines that have one military characteristic. These would include pump action shotguns with
magazines, as well as, semi-automatic shotguns with magazines.

You may be thinking to yourself that
the weapons you already own that fit into these categories will be
grandfathered in. You would be correct. However, as I
pointed out grandfathering requires the
following:

 It Requires
that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act,
to include:

 Background
check of owner and any transferee;

 Type and
serial number of the firearm;

 Positive
identification, including photograph and fingerprint, you will be registered as
a militant criminal.

 Certification
from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate
State or local laws;

Also there is an additional tax for you
to pay when you register those weapons under the National Firearms Act that you
already own! According to the
NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, “The NFA imposes a $200 tax per firearm.” So, they are going to
charge you a couple of hundred bucks more for every weapon you already own that
falls into these categories!

So while we’ve been hearing lots about
the AR-15, an excellent and accurate rifle, and the snooty remarks about how “no one needs a 30 round magazine,” no one
needs’ a Lamborghini either, so are we going to outlaw everything the
brain-dead legislators decide we don’t need. The sneakiness of the Democrats on the new
bill doesn’t disappoint us as Senator Feinstein has gone way beyond any of that. The focus of late has been on the military
style rifles, in the wake of the shootings recently, including the one that
took place in Newtown, Connecticut.
Semi-automatic handguns have had some degree of light cast upon them as
well, but the call for banning is not just about these weapons and it isn’t
just about children murdered at Sandy Hook.
It’s the old adage of the “camel getting its nose in the tent.”

This is just a way for brain-damaged Democrats
and anti American gun grabbers to get their foot in your door, on their way to
attempt to ban and confiscate all guns. Right
now they claim to want to do it only prospectively, but should this pass and
more shootings occur, there will be a push to do it retroactively. You should wonder how they would enforce it. If you still have the ability to think for
yourself you will know that Martial Law will easily take care or that.

Should it come to that, I believe there
are many Americans who will give their guns to the government. In fact, many are doing so now for next to
nothing gift cards. Other Americans however,
in the spirit of the founding fathers, will give the feds their guns….bullets first,
of course.

But what will be next? Now it’s military style rifles, semi-automatic
handguns, and shotguns. How long before
revolvers are included? What about Derringers? How long before even a simple .22 rifle or
handgun, or even a BB gun will be pushed as a “threat to society?

Do gun buybacks work?

Periodically, some cities offer a gun
buyback program in an attempt to get as many guns off the streets as
possible. Cities such as Detroit, Cincinnati, Boston, San Diego and Los
Angeles have tried this program. This past
week, Los Angeles offered a $200 grocery gift
card for anyone turning in an automatic weapon and a $100 gift card for
handguns, rifles, and shotguns.

Generally, the police don’t ask any
questions about the guns or where they came from and so no arrests are
made. In LA this past week, they asked people to place the guns in the
trunk of their cars, pull up to the buyback locations, open the trunk and allow
the police to remove the gun.

The preliminary count in Los Angeles yielded
around 1400 guns, 49 of which were assault weapons and 477 were handguns.
Officials in Los Angeles
and other cities with buyback programs say the programs are a success and help
to keep the streets safer, but are those claims really true?

According to the National
Research Council of the National Academies report (Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review) in 2004,
the buyback programs’ effect on crime rates is negligible at best. Their studies
showed that many of the guns turned in are old, inherited from previous owners,
and/or are in need of serious repair. None of the guns were found to be useful
or used in crimes. Not in this century
anyway!

I wonder just how many criminals turned
in their guns. Likely none! There was however an increase in home
break-ins and gun thefts just prior to the buyback program, and many of those
guns were recovered in the program. The conclusion can only be that the
gun buyback program actually served to promote an increase in criminal break-ins
and thefts just so the criminals could get the money from the police without
any questions being asked. Therefore, the police were promoting crime and
serving as a fence for stolen merchandise.

The only positive effect there is from
gun buyback programs is that it makes the city officials look like they are
doing something worthwhile to help prevent crime, even though they may actually
be increasing crime. Other than that, the programs are useless or
negative and should be stopped before any more houses are burglarized for their
antique useless guns.

Awr Hawkins is right: “If we are foolish
enough to embrace a ban on any weapon in the coming Congress then we are
unwittingly embracing a ban on every weapon.” Moreover, we are subsequently
banning all God given rights, because even as our present bureaucrats
are suffering from Political Brain-damage, at least our Framers new that an
armed Citizenry was “necessary for the Security of a free State”, and therefore
necessary for the security of a public school…

Sent by my son Brad:

“The primary-school shooting
in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is
just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the
public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to
defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians
really serve.

The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women
to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn’t work they will
continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger
children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot
fight back against government tyranny.

Newtown is the U.S.A.’s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by
the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns
from the U.K.
It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried
out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be
questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

It’s always the same people behind it – the gun-grabbers who want the people to
be defenceless against the gun-grabbers’ employers – the banksters who own all
of the politicians. They get their
politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people’s
freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian
police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.

The Dunblane massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who
was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring
involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and
others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban
and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the
elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100
years, which is proof of the above.

Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton
and made it look like Hamilton
committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn’t be questioned
. Hamilton was found in the school
gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman
PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on
either side of Hamilton’s
body.

The autopsy revealed that Hamilton
was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes.
There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a
second shooter who killed Hamilton.

Similarly, the first reports from Newtown
were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver
Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.

Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen
there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.

Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don’t fall for it.
Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.

All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning
the people from having guns. It works the same in every country – Hungerford in
England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur
in Australia and the list in
America
is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun
culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans’ love of guns
and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the
government.

Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and
Chairman Mao, to name just three.

If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters,
their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free
zones.

From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.”

A Columbine father - 12
years later sent by one of my readers!

Guess our national leaders didn't expect this, hmm?

Darrell Scott, the
father of Rachel Scott, a victim of the ColumbineHigh School shootings in Littleton , Colorado
, was invited to address the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee. What he said to our national leaders during
this special session of Congress was painfully honest.

They were not
prepared for what he had to say, nor was it received very well. But It needs to be heard by every parent,
every teacher, every politician, every sociologist, every psychologist, and
every so-called expert! These courageous
words spoken by Darrell Scott are powerful, penetrating, and deeply
personal. There is no doubt that God
sent this man as a voice crying in the wilderness... The following is a portion of the transcript:

"Since the dawn of
creation there has been both good & evil in the hearts of men and women. We
all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my
wonderful daughter, Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher,
and the other eleven children who died must not be in vain. Their blood cries
out for answers."

"The first recorded act
of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field. The villain
was not the club he used... Neither was it the NCA, the National Club
Association. The true killer was Cain, and the reason for the murder could only
be found in Cain's heart."

"In the days that
followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be
pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA. I am not a
hunter. I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA -
because I don't believe that they are responsible for my daughter's death.
Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they
had anything to do with Rachel's murder I would be their strongest opponent.

I am here today to declare
that Columbine was not just a tragedy -- it was a spiritual event that should
be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies here
in this room. Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the
accusers themselves. I wrote a poem just four nights ago that expresses my
feelings best."

Men and women are three-part
beings. We all consist of body, mind, and spirit. When we refuse to
acknowledge a third part of our make-up, we create a void that allows evil,
prejudice, and hatred to rush in and wreak havoc. Spiritual presences
were present within our educational systems for most of our nation's history.
Many of our major colleges began as theological seminaries. This is a
historical fact. What has happened to us as a nation? We have refused to honor
God, and in so doing, we open the doors to hatred and violence. And when
something as terrible as Columbine's tragedy occurs -- politicians immediately
look for a scapegoat such as the NRA. They immediately seek to pass more
restrictive laws that contribute to erode away our personal and private
liberties. We do not need more restrictive laws. Eric and Dylan would not have
been stopped by metal detectors. No amount of gun laws can stop someone who
spends months planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our
own hearts.

As my son Craig lay under that
table in the school library and saw his two friends murdered before his very
eyes, he did not hesitate to pray in school. I defy any law or politician to
deny him that right! I challenge every young person in America , and around the world, to realize that
on April 20, 1999, at ColumbineHigh School prayer was
brought back to our schools. Do not let the many prayers offered by those
students be in vain. Dare to move into the new millennium with a sacred
disregard for legislation that violates your God-given right to communicate
with Him. To those of you who would point your finger at the NRA -- I give to
you a sincere challenge... Dare to examine your own heart before casting the
first stone!

My daughter's death will not
be in vain! The young people of this
country will not allow that to happen!"

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Nan alluded to, if “Assault
Magazines” were outlawed the massacre at Newtown wouldn’t have occered.

By de Andréa

December 20, 2012

Now I don’t know what mental
institution Nancy Pelosi escaped from or what she means by “Assault Magazines”,
surly she doesn’t mean the Saturday Evening Post, I don’t think that is an
assault magazine. Maybe she means the
magazine published by the NRA. And then,
how would one assault someone with a magazine anyway?

Yes you read that correctly. Nancy Pelosi used the term assault magazines
in an interview with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell in talking about how the kind of
firepower used in the Sandy HookElementary School
shootings should be outlawed. And if
those high capacity magazines were Illegal would the shooter have said to
himself, “these magazines are illegal, so I guess I will not go to the school
and kill a bunch of kids today”. Oh Yeah!

Even some guns I own myself are
considered by the left to be “assault weapons.” I have not cared what people have called them
in the past, to be honest, that does not make them anymore or less dangerous
than any other gun.

However, in reading apiece by Jan Morgan, I think I’m going to stop referring
to them as such. Here’s what Morgan
writes:

My AR is not an assault rifle.
It is not an assault weapon.
It will never be used to criminally assault anyone.
My AR will only be used for defensive and sporting purposes.
It is simply a modern musket.

“1. An attack or violent onset, whether
by an individual, a company, or an army.
An assault by private persons may be made with or without weapons. As assault by an army is a violent hostile
attack; and when made upon a fort or fortified place is called a storm, as
opposed to sap or siege.

2. An attack by hostile words or
measures; as, an assault upon the prerogatives of a prince, or upon a
constitution of government.

3. In Law, an unlawful setting upon
one’s person; an attempt or offer to beat another, without touching his person;
as by lifting the fist or a cane, in a threatening manner. If the blow aimed takes effect, it is a
battery.

So Morgan is correct. My weapons, and I’m sure many of yours, will
never be used to criminally assault anyone.
In fact, if we were to use the term “assault weapon,” it could literally
be applied to anything; a baseball bat, knife, pencil, barbed wire, oreven a car!”

However, Pelosi moves the argument up a
notch. Now she is not even calling for a
ban on what she wrongly calls “assault weapons,” but is calling
for “assault
magazines” to be outlawed!

She told Mitchell on Tuesday:

“How does something like this happen? Because a person with impaired judgment had
access to firepower that should be outlawed.
There is no reason why these assault magazines – and that’s what they
are. We’ve got to call them what they
are, assault magazines. You aren’t even
allowed to have that on a hunting gun in California,
which has three shots.” Pelosi thinks the fire-power
originates with the magazine. It is
doubtful Nan even knows what a magazine is much
less which end of the gun the bullet comes out of. Yes Nancy Pelosi should be banned from coming
within 1000 feet of a gun. And Nancy’…hunting rifles in California have a minimum of 5 rounds not
3…a 3 round magazine wouldn’t even be worth manufacturing.

What the heck is an assault magazine
anyway? Are people with AR-15s and
AK-47s now throwing their fully loaded magazines at people? This is so far over the top it’s rather
difficult to take seriously, but we must because these are the mentally
disabled people that are framing the argument, and if we do not correct the
misuse of language, then we will inevitably lose the argument and the fight
over our rights and freedom.

That being said, I’ll remind Pelosi and
the rest of the ignorant communists that the Second Amendment has nothing whatsoever
to do with hunting.

“A well regulated militia being
necessary to the security of a free
state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed.”

Since theSupreme Court has ruled
that this right applies to individualsand since the Amendment begins by
defining the purpose for the right to keep and bear arms is with regards to a
“well regulated militia and the security of a free State, not hunting, so the
reference to hunting is irrelevant. The
problem comes for both the courts and the Congress with that nagging little bit
at the end, “Shall not be infringed.”
This is the beginning point of where the liberals start. Our voices must be loud in pointing that out.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

What will happen if American cities are turned into
GUN FREE ZONES? Bear in mind, this is
what Di Fi, Bloomberg, Obama and other anti-American Hitlerites that are stuck
on stupid want to do to your country…

By de Andréa

December 19, 2012

Did you know for example that our own
beloved city of Chicago is the deadliest most
gun violent city in America? It is actually the most violent city in the
world, yes, IN THE WORLD, except for CaracasVenezuela. No it’s not an exaggeration my friend, it is
documented. And do you know what else it
is! It is a GUN FREE CITY…

Gun toting criminals from all over the
world are coming to Chicago
to kill Americans. 19 and a half per
100,000 is the gun violence murder rate in Chicago,
more than 300 percent higher than that of New
York City’s 6 per 100,000. NYC is a SODA FREE CITY so they have the
highest consumption of soda in the world…I don’t know!

NBC Chicago reportson some of those "Chicago
values" the city's Mayor Rahm Emanuel (Democrat, Communist naturally)
touted, justifying his alderman's refusal to grant a license to a Chick-fil-A
potential franchisee.

Chicago likes to compare itself to other world cities, so Ward Room of
Channel 5 NBC Chicago
thought it would find out how they ranked in violence. It turns out no one can top them. Among what are considered Alpha world cities,
Chicago has the highest murder rate -- higher
even than the Third World metropolises of Mexico City and Sao Paolo.

Chicago's murder rate increased to 19.4
per 100,000 since its increase in gun-laws, more than three times that of New
York's (6 per 100,000) and more than two and a half times that of Los Angeles' (7.5
per 100,000), its closest American competitors.
Caracas, Venezuela,
which apparently is not an Alpha world city--thank you Hugo
Chavez--has a higher murder rate of 130 per 100,000 and Damascus Syria might have a higher murder rate.

In the American cities mentioned, most
of the murders are committed with guns. These
cities all have laws against murder. They
even have some laws regarding guns; Chicago
however has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation.

As President Barack Obama (D)
approvingly quoted from the gangster movie The
Untouchables when on the campaign trail in Philadelphia four years ago, “If
they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun," Obama said. Of course, this attitude was prior to Obama's
evolution on gun control and his absolute corrupt power.

Interestingly, Obama thought guns were
a rural, small town phenomena, not part of normal life in his big city, as
evidenced by the comments he made at an elite fund raiser in San Francisco also four
years ago. "They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to
people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment
as a way to explain their frustrations." Hmmm, wrong again Obama. Most of the murderers and murdered
look like “the sons Obama never had”.
Many of the murdered in Chicago live in
the district Obama represented in the Illinois
state legislature, another corrupt body representing Chicago
and Illinois
values.

So, with this kind of Chicago
leadership and its Chick-fil-A priorities it was not too surprising to read
Sunday morning's news about a typical Saturday summer night in the city, further confirmationof Chicago's #1 violent ranking.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So why has Gun control become such a big issue with Obama? I can tell you right off, it has absolutely nothing
to do with the reduction in violent crime, even though that’s how it is being
packaged and sold. No, Obama is caught
up in the absolute power syndrome and gun restriction and eventually gun bans
and confiscation is paramount to absolute power and control. Obama is copy-cating Hitler’s protocol of gun
bans for the purpose of safety and we all know how that turned out.

Chicago’s extreme gun
restrictions makes it near impossible for its residents to own a gun, that is
unless you are a criminal where restrictions and laws are meaningless.

So if you want your city to have a
murder rate as high, or higher than Chicago,
then by all means push for more gun laws, restrictions and even a total gun
ban. The Newtown incident will pale in the face of a gun
ban reality.

If you want to attract aphids to your
trees, then be sure to put up a sigh that reads: LADY BUG FREE ZONE…

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Are schools Safe?
Sandy Hook is being touted as a model
school for student safety… Well… you
failed, Sandy Hook! Here’s Why…

By de Andréa

December 18, 2012

On December 14, a twenty year old man entered through a
window in the locked Sandy Hook elementary school
of NewtownConnecticut and killed 27 people including
himself and 20 children under the age of seven.

Schools, movie theaters, churches and the like are among the
safest places on earth…for the criminally insane. Because they all have at least one thing in
common, guns are not allowed!

How does one enter a locked school? Answer…the same way one enters a locked
house. The thing is’, inside a locked
house there may be someone with a loaded gun, inside a locked school one will
not find a gun except in the hands of a criminal.

Children are safer on the street or in a mall than they are
in school. According to statistics, and
common sense, schools are among the most dangerous places for children. Why?
Because they are a politically correct GUN FREE ZONE! The safest place for a gunman to go crazy…

Over shadowed by the Sandy Hook massacre was the shooting last week at the mall in Clackamas Oregon.Two innocent human beings lost their lives
there, but the carnage was cut short by Nick Meli, it could have been a lot
worse. But Mali has a concealed carry permit,
and was in the mall when the gunman opened fire. (Didn’t hear about that on the 6 o’clock news
did you?) Meli pulled his weapon, but
did not shoot the gunman because there were bystanders who could have been
injured. The gunman saw Meli, an armed
citizen, and rather than shoot more innocent people he pointed his weapon at
himself. “He was working on his rifle,” said Meli. ”He kept pulling the
charging handle and hitting the side.” The break in gunfire allowed Meli to pull
out his own gun, but he never took his eyes off the shooter. “As
I was going down to pull, I saw someone in the back of the shooter,
and I knew if I fired and missed, I could hit them,” he said. “I’m
not beating myself up cause I didn’t shoot him,” said Meli. “I know
after he saw me, the last shot he fired was the one he used on himself.”

An interesting bit of information nearly parallel to this case in Oregon is that the shooter shot himself when he saw the
citizen with a gun…a nearly identical reaction occered in the Sandy
Hook school, the shooter stopped his rampage and killed himself
when he heard the sirens of the police cars arriving. The point is, these people are cowards and will
stop or run or shoot themselves at the slightest resistance.

It's Time to PROTECT School Children, Instead of Criminals
--Select HERE to DEMAND Congress REPEAL the "Gun-Free
School Zones" Act!

In 1996, the Gun Free amendment wasrammed through congress as an addition to a giant
last-minute "must-pass" appropriations bill. The bill, call the "Gun-Free School
Zones Act," was originally passed in 1990, but had beenstruck down asunconstitutional-- so the Communist Radical anti-gun
Senator Heb Kohl re-worded it a little, and President Bill Clinton signed it
intolaw. Guess what?
It is still dangerous and unconstitutional.

This legislationdisarmed school staffand other adults -- leaving elementary and secondary
school children totally defenseless to criminal killers.

It also made it virtually impossible to drive
your car down the street with a gun inside without violating the law, by
creating a 1000-foot so-called"gun-free
zone"around every
public and private school in the country.

Schools were now "Gun free,"
that is, EXCEPT forCRIMINALS OBVIOUSLY.

We've seen the results of this misguided mindless
law over, and over, again... most recently, in the tragic events in Newtown, Connecticut.

It's time to put an END to "Criminal Safe Zones", including in our nation's public
schools -- it's time toprotectcitizens by finallyrepealingthe unconstitutional "Gun-Free School
Zones" Act!Now, more innocents
have been slaughtered -- and their murders could have been
prevented, if not for the "Gun-Free School Zones" Act which gives
nothing but a dangerous false sense of security.

Thankfully, legislation HAS been introduced to REPEAL this blatantly
unconstitutional – and obviously dangerous -- law: It’s called the "Citizens Protection Act" (H.R. 2613). If we can get this bill passed, we could take
a giant leap towards preventing murderous madmen like Adam Lanza from killing
dozens of unarmed Americans -- because now, some of them could be armed and
could STOP the
assassin, dead in his tracks.

The "Citizens Protection Act" is STUCK
IN COMMITTEE -- it's up to you to FORCE Congress to vote on it QUICKLY,
before they go home and this Congressional Session is OVER!Call and/or write your Congressman.

Insane criminals seek out
GUN FREE ZONES

"One of the
things I've written about in the passed, is the attack at the Aurora Colorado
movie theater. But this is something you
will never hear on your favorite news program.

Seven movie
theaters that were showing the Batman movie when it opened at the end of July but
the killer went to Aurora. Why???
Out of those seven movie theaters, only one theater was posted as
banning permit-concealed handguns, A GUN FREE ZONE!
The killer didn't go to the movie theater that was closest to his
home. He didn't go to the movie theater
that was the largest movie theater in Colorado,
which was essentially the same distance from his apartment as the one he ended
up going to. Instead, the one he picked
was the only one of those movie theaters that banned people taking
permit-concealed handguns into that theater.
The Aurora
was THE ONLY GUN
FREE THEATER…

The problem is, whether it is the Portland shooting earlier this week, or the
Connecticut shooting Friday, or the Sikh temple attack in Wisconsin, or any one
of the other 37 times this has happened since 1977 these attacks always take
place in the few areas within a state where permit-concealed handguns are
banned. It's not just this year; it's
all these years in the past. And at some
point people have to recognize that continuing to do the same thing over, and
over, and expecting a different result isn’t working folks. It causes me to wonder who is really’ insane
here? Is it the criminals or the
legislators?

If you don't
think thatarming teachers and administratorswould work to thwart crazed killerslike Lanza you would be wrong because --IT ALREADY HAS my friend.Rep.
Dennis Richardson, a State Representative in Oregon
who's also saying that gun bans on school property should be overturned, haspointedto a 1999 school shooting in Mississippi in which an assistant principal
held a shooter at bay with a handgun while police arrived. The shooter killed two students and injured
seven others before the principal was able to retrieve his handgun from his truck. Just think for a moment if you can…how many
more students would have been killed if the principal hadn’t had a gun, maybe 20,
or 30? And what if the principal was
allowed to carry his gun instead of having to lock it in his truck? Maybe no one would have been killed. You can apply this to every one of these mass
murders including 9/11.

Newtown Connecticut:
Gun free zones invite mad mass-murderers, say law enforcement officers: The shocking murder
spree at a Connecticut elementary school that claimed the
lives of 27 people, including 20 children, will undoubtedly be used by the U.S.
government, the United Nations, and the establishment news organization to push
for laws that would violate an already compromised Second Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, say law enforcement officials on Saturday. But former police
detective Mike Snopes believes that gun free zones invite killers.

“The killer in [Newtown] came armed for
bear and couldn’t care less about some gun law.
The school’s anti-gun law prevented any adults working at the school
from having access to a firearm. If the
school’s principal had been armed and trained, she might have saved many lives. Had several people been armed at that school,
the shooter, suspect Adam
Lanza, would have possibly been stopped at the front door by a hale
of bullets,” said the
former NYPD detective.

While being
interviewed by Fox News anchorman
Rick Folbaum, NYPD Detective John Baeza noted that the location of the Colorado movie theater
shootings occurred at a large shopping mall that was a gun free zone. Click
here to read the entire article.

THE BOTTOM LINE:It is not illegal or bad to own or carry a gun! What is’ illegal, is the killing of innocent
people. Almost no one, including some of
the parents of the dead children, are blaming the shooter for this heinous
massacre. Instead, the bulk of the blame
goes to the implement of death, the gun.
Not only is it illegal to kill innocent people no matter how one does
it, it is illegal to deny people the right of self defense. So if you think children are too young to
carry a gun for their own self defense, then what about those who are
responsible for their well being…the parents, the teachers, the
administrators. What does it mean to be
responsible for innocent helpless children?
Oh well…we locked the door! Let
me ask you this, you Communist control freaks, how is this GUN FREE ZONE with
locked doors, working out for you irresponsible brain-dead robots? Maybe you should get your head out of your
computer and just think for yourself for a change…

If you want to see
more and even worse tragedies than this, then let your representatives know
that you support more of the same, more GUN FREE ZONES, more anti gun laws that
only law abiding people obey. The
criminals are laughing at your moronic stupidity…

Yeah! You bet I’m direct, and I get more, and more,
angry, every time this happens. Because it
doesn’t have to happen at all my friend, at least not this way; there is an
intelligent purpose for the Second Amendment.
But you programmed anti-American Bloomberg Commies wouldn’t know
anything about that, now would you…