Transcription

1 2. METHODS OF PROOF Methods of Proof 2.1. Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try. Trivial Proof: If we know q is true then p q is true regardless of the truth value of p. Vacuous Proof: If p is a conjunction of other hypotheses and we know one or more of these hypotheses is false, then p is false and so p q is vacuously true regardless of the truth value of q. Direct Proof: Assume p, and then use the rules of inference, axioms, definitions, and logical equivalences to prove q. Indirect Proof or Proof by Contradiction: Assume p and q and derive a contradiction r r. Proof by Contrapositive: (Special case of Proof by Contradiction.) Give a direct proof of q p. Assume q and then use the rules of inference, axioms, definitions, and logical equivalences to prove p.(can be thought of as a proof by contradiction in which you assume p and q and arrive at the contradiction p p.) Proof by Cases: If the hypothesis p can be separated into cases p 1 p 2 p k, prove each of the propositions, p 1 q, p 2 q,..., p k q, separately. (You may use different methods of proof for different cases.) We are now getting to the heart of this course: methods you can use to write proofs. Let s investigate the strategies given above in some detail Trivial Proof/Vacuous Proof. Example Prove the statement: If there are 100 students enrolled in this course this semester, then 6 2 = 36. Proof. The assertion is trivially true, since the conclusion is true, independent of the hypothesis (which, may or may not be true depending on the enrollment). Example Prove the statement. If 6 is a prime number, then 6 2 = 30.

2 2. METHODS OF PROOF 70 Proof. The hypothesis is false, therefore the statement is vacuously true (even though the conclusion is also false). The first two methods of proof, the Trivial Proof and the Vacuous Proof are certainly the easiest when they work. Notice that the form of the Trivial Proof, q (p q), is, in fact, a tautology. This follows from disjunction introduction, since p q is equivalent to p q. Likewise, the Vacuous Proof is based on the tautology p (p q). Exercise Fill in the reasons for the following proof of the tautology p (p q). [ p (p q)] [p ( p q)] [(p p) q] T q T Exercise Let A = {1, 2, 3} and R = {(2, 3), (2, 1)}( A A). Prove: if a, b, c A are such that (a, b) R and (b, c) R then (a, c) R. Since it is a rare occasion when we are able to get by with one of these two methods of proof, we turn to some we are more likely to need. In most of the following examples the underlying theorem may be a fact that is well known to you. The purpose in presenting them, however, is not to surprise you with new mathematical facts, but to get you thinking about the correct way to set up and carry out a mathematical argument, and you should read them carefully with this in mind Direct Proof. Example Prove the statement: For all integers m and n, if m and n are odd integers, then m + n is an even integer. Proof. Assume m and n are arbitrary odd integers. written in the form m = 2a + 1 and n = 2b + 1, Then m and n can be

3 2. METHODS OF PROOF 71 where a and b are also integers. Then m + n = (2a + 1) + (2b + 1) (substitution) = 2a + 2b + 2 (associative and commutative laws of addition) = 2(a + b + 1) (distributive law) Since m+n is twice another integer, namely, a+b+1, m+n is an even integer. The first strategy you should try when attempting to prove any assertion is to give a direct proof. That is, assume the hypotheses that are given and try to argue directly that the conclusion follows. This is often the best approach when the hypotheses can be translated into algebraic expressions (equations or inequalities) that can be manipulated to give other algebraic expressions, which are useful in verifying the conclusion. Example shows a simple direct proof of a very familiar result. We are using the familiar definitions of what it means for an integer to be even or odd: An integer n is even if n = 2k for some integer k; an integer n is odd if n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Study the form of this proof. There are two hypotheses, m is an odd integer, and n is an odd integer ; and the conclusion is the statement m + n is an even integer. This theorem is a quantified statement ( for all integers m and n, or for all odd integers m and n ). In the proof we assumed the hypotheses held for arbitrarily integers m and n, and then we wrote down equations that follow from the definition of what it means for these integers to be odd. Although this looks like a pretty obvious thing to do, at least when you see someone else do it, this step, in which you bring your knowledge to the problem, may seem like a big one to take, and you may find yourself stalling out at this point. One possible reason this may happen is that you may be trying to do too much at once. The cure for this is to be patient: take small steps, using the appropriate definitions and previously proven facts, and see where they lead. When we wrote down m = 2a + 1 and n = 2b + 1, we did a number of fairly sophisticated things. First, we used our knowledge (definitions) of what it means for an integer to be odd. Second, in order for this information to be useful, we needed to translate this knowledge into a mathematical expression, or expressions in this case, that are subject to manipulation. And third, in setting up these expressions, we needed to use appropriate mathematical notation, so that we did not introduce any subtle or hidden relationships into the picture that are unwarranted by the hypotheses.

4 2. METHODS OF PROOF 72 A common mistake of this type might arise as follows: Well, m is an odd integer, so I can write m = 2k + 1, where k is an integer. Since n is also an odd integer, I can write n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer. Do you see the mistake? By allowing the same letter k to represent what might be different integers, we have inadvertently added another assumption, namely, that m = n! Of course, we didn t mean to do this, but, unfortunately, our intentions haven t been carried out, and so our proof breaks down at this point. In order to maintain the arbitrariness of m and n, we must allow, at the least, that they be different. We accomplish this by choosing different letters a and b in our representations of m and n as twice an integer plus one. There is nothing sacred about a and b; we could have used k and l, or x and y, or α and β, or any pair of symbols that have not been appropriated for some other use. Upon closer scrutiny, this first step now starts to seem like a big one indeed! Especially if we may not be sure just where it will lead. The rest of the proof, however, proceeds fairly routinely. We add m and n and observe that the resulting expression has a factor of 2. We now only have to get past the recognition problem: observing that the resulting expression gives us what we were looking for. Since we have expressed m + n as twice another integer, m + n is, by definition, an even integer. By Universal Generalization we may now confidently declare Q.E.D. (the abbreviation of quod erat demonstrandum or which was to be demonstrated ). Often a box at the end of a proof or the abbrviation Q.E.D. is used at the end of a proof to indicate it is finished. Exercise Give a careful proof of the statement: For all integers m and n, if m is odd and n is even, then m + n is odd Proof by Contrapositive. Example Prove the statement: For all integers m and n, if the product of m and n is even, then m is even or n is even. We prove the contrapositive of the statement: If m and n are both odd integers, then mn is odd. Proof. Suppose that m and n are arbitrary odd integers. Then m = 2a + 1 and n = 2b + 1, where a and b are integers. Then

5 2. METHODS OF PROOF 73 mn = (2a + 1)(2b + 1) (substitution) = 4ab + 2a + 2b + 1 (associative, commutative, and distributive laws) = 2(2ab + a + b) + 1 (distributive law) Since mn is twice an integer (namely, 2ab + a + b) plus 1, mn is odd. If a direct proof of an assertion appears problematic, the next most natural strategy to try is a proof of the contrapositive. In Example we use this method to prove that if the product of two integers, m and n, is even, then m or n is even. This statement has the form p (r s). If you take our advice above, you will first try to give a direct proof of this statement: assume mn is even and try to prove m is even or n is even. Next, you would use the definition of even to write mn = 2k, where k is an integer. You would now like to conclude that m or n has the factor 2. This can, in fact, be proved directly, but it requires more knowledge of number theory than we have available at this point. Thus, we seem to have reached a dead-end with the direct approach, and we decide to try an indirect approach instead. The contrapositive of p (r s) is (r s) p, or, by De Morgan s Law, This translates into the statement ( r s) p. If m and n are odd, then mn is odd (where not even translates to odd ). This is a good illustration of how the symbolic form of a proposition can be helpful in finding the correct statement we wish to prove. In this particular example, the necessity of De Morgan s Law may be more evident in the symbolic form than in the English version. Now we give a direct proof of the contrapositive: we assume m and n are arbitrary odd integers and deduce mn is odd. This proof is carried out in very much the same way as the direct proof in Example The main difficulty we encounter with the problem of proving the original assertion is to realize that a direct proof should be abandoned in favor of some other strategy. Exercise The following statement is a special case of the proposition proved in Example Give a careful proof of this statement without assuming the result in Example For every integer n, if n 2 is even, then n is even.

6 2.5. Proof by Contradiction. 2. METHODS OF PROOF 74 Example Prove the statement is true: Let x and y be real numbers. If 5x + 25y = 1723, then x or y is not an integer. Proof. Assume x and y are real numbers such that 5x+25y = 1723, and assume that both x and y are integers. By the distributive law, 5(x + 5y) = Since x and y are integers, this implies 1723 is divisible by 5. The integer 1723, however, is clearly not divisible by 5. This contradiction establishes the result. If we have tried unsuccessfully to find a direct proof of a statement or its contrapositive, we might next try to give a proof by contradiction. In this method of proof we assume the hypotheses are true and the conclusion is false and try to arrive at a contradiction. The validity of proof by contradiction follows from the fact that (p q) is equivalent to p q: if we can show that p q is false, then (p q) is true, so that the equivalent proposition p q is also true. In Example we are asked to prove that if 5x + 25y = 1723, then x is not an integer or y is not an integer. This has the same propositional form as the example in Example 2.4.1: p (r s). If we try to give a direct proof of this statement, then we are forced to prove a negative, which can be difficult. If we try to prove the contrapositive, then knowing that x and y are integers doesn t seem to be helpful in trying to show directly that 5x + 25y 1723, since we are again trying to prove a negative. On the other hand, if we assume p and (r s), which is equivalent to r s, then we have two positive statements to work with: 5x+25y = 1723, and x and y are integers. After a couple of observations we arrive at the contradiction r r, where r is the statement 1723 is divisible by 5. This contradiction establishes the truth of the statement, and we are through. Exercise Prove: For all real numbers x and y, if 35x + 14y = 253, then x is not an integer or y is not an integer. Here is another example of a proposition that is best proved by contradiction. Example For all positive real numbers a, b, and c, if ab = c, then a c or b c.

7 2. METHODS OF PROOF 75 Proof. Suppose a, b, and c are positive real numbers such that ab = c, and suppose a > c and b > c. (Notice the use of De Morgan s Law again. Also, recall that the symbol c represents the positive square root of c, not ± c.) By order properties of the real numbers, and Thus, ab > a c > c c = c implies b > c ab > a c, since a > 0, a > c a c > c c = c, since c > 0. ab > c. But ab = c; hence, ab is not greater than c, a contradiction. This proves our assumption a > c and b > c cannot be true when a, b, and c are positive real numbers such that ab = c. Therefore a c or b c. Exercise Consider the statement: For all nonnegative real numbers a, b, and c, if a 2 + b 2 = c 2, then a + b c. (a) Give a proof by contradiction. (b) Give a direct proof. [Hint: The extra idea needed for a direct proof should emerge naturally from a proof by contradiction.] Let s step back and compare direct proof, proof by contrapositive, and proof by contradiction. Exercise Fill in the blanks. If we are proving the implication p q we assume... (1) p for a direct proof. (2) for a proof by contrapositive (3) for a proof by contradiction. We are then allowed to use the truth of the assumption in 1, 2, or 3 in the proof. After the initial assumption, we prove p q by showing (4) q must follow from the assumptions for a direct proof. (5) must follow the assumptions for a proof by contrapositive. (6) must follow the assumptions for a proof by contradiction.

8 2. METHODS OF PROOF Proof by Cases. Example If x is a real number such that x2 1 x < x < 1. > 0, then either x > 1 or Proof. Assume x is a real number for which the inequality x 2 1 x + 2 > 0 holds. Factor the numerator of the fraction to get the inequality (x + 1)(x 1) > 0. x + 2 For this combination of x + 1, x 1, and x + 2 to be positive, either all are positive or two are negative and the other is positive. This gives four cases to consider: Case 1. x + 1 > 0, x 1 > 0, and x + 2 > 0. In this case x > 1, x > 1, and x > 2, which implies x > 1. Case 2. x + 1 > 0, x 1 < 0, and x + 2 < 0. In this case x > 1, x < 1, and x < 2, and there is no x satisfying all three inequalities simultaneously. Case 3. x + 1 < 0, x 1 > 0, and x + 2 < 0. In this case x < 1, x > 1, and x < 2, and there is no x satisfying all three inequalities simultaneously. Case 4. x + 1 < 0, x 1 < 0, and x + 2 > 0. In this case x < 1, x < 1, and x > 2, which implies that 2 < x < 1. Thus, either x > 1 (Case 1) or 2 < x < 1 (Case 4). Sometimes the hypothesis of a statement can be broken down into simpler cases that may be investigated separately. The validity of a proof by cases rests on the equivalence [(p 1 p n ) q] [(p 1 q) (p n q)]. In Example this method is used to verify the solution to the inequality, x 2 1 x + 2 > 0. Exercise Prove: For every real number x, x 2 = x. [Hint: Recall as above that x 2 represents the positive square root of x 2, and look at two cases: x 0 and x < 0.] A proof by cases can tend to be a little tedious. Here is an extreme example of such a proof.

9 2. METHODS OF PROOF 77 Example Prove that if n is a natural number less than 41, then n 2 n+41 is a prime number. Proof. Recall that a prime number is an integer greater than 1 that is only divisible by itself and 1. It would be nice if there was some general line of argument that would work, but, unfortunately, there doesn t seem to be an obvious one. As a result, the proof must be broken down into 41 cases corresponding to n = 0, 1, 2,..., 40. In each case we examine the integer n 2 n + 41 to see if it is prime. For example, we can observe: n = 0: = 41 is prime. n = 1: = 41 is prime. n = 2: = 43 is prime. n = 3: = 47 is prime. n = 4: = 53 is prime. As n increases, it becomes increasingly more time-consuming to show that n 2 n+41 is, indeed, prime. For example, when n = 40, = The simplest way to show that 1601 is prime is to show that every prime number 1601 fails to be a divisor of There are 12 such numbers to try, and you might as well check them on your calculator. Alternatively, you could write a computer program or use a symbolic program such as Maple or Mathematica that has a routine to test a number for primality Existence Proofs. An existence proof is a proof of a statement of the form xp (x). Existence proofs generally fall into one of the following two types: Constructive Proof: Establish P (c) for some c in the universe of discourse. Nonconstructive Proof: Assume no c exists that makes P (c) true and derive a contradiction. In other words, use a proof by contradiction Constructive Proof. Example Prove the statement: There exists a triple (a, b, c) of positive integers such that a 2 + b 2 = c 2. Proof. Choose a = 3, b = 4 and c = 5.

10 2. METHODS OF PROOF 78 In a constructive proof one finds an explicit example in the universe of discourse for which the statement is true. Here is another example. Example Prove: If f(x) = x 3 + x 5, then there exists a positive real number c such that f (c) = 7. Proof. Calculate the derivative of f: f (x) = 3x Then we want to find a positive number c such that f (c) = 3c = 7. Solving for c: 3c 2 = 6 c 2 = 2 c = ± 2 Then c = 2 is a positive real number and f ( 2) = 3( 2) = Nonconstructive Proof. Example Pigeon Hole Principle: If n + 1 objects (pigeons) are distributed into n boxes (pigeon holes), then some box must contain at least 2 of the objects. Proof. Assume n + 1 objects (pigeons) are distributed into n boxes. Suppose the boxes are labeled B 1, B 2,..., B n, and assume that no box contains more than 1 object. Let k i denote the number of objects placed in B i. Then k i 1 for i = 1,..., n, and so k 1 + k k n } {{ + 1 } n. n terms But this contradicts the fact that k 1 + k k n = n + 1, the total number of objects we started with. Sometimes, constructing an example may be difficult, if not impossible, due to the nature of the problem. If you suspect this is the case, you should try a proof by contradiction: Assume there is no such example and show that this leads to a contradiction. If you are successful, you have established existence, but you have not exhibited a specific example. After you have studied the proof of the basic pigeon hole principal in Example 2.9.1, try your hand at the following variations.

11 2. METHODS OF PROOF 79 Exercise Prove: If 2n + 1 objects are distributed into n boxes, then some box must contain at least 3 of the objects. Exercise Fill in the blank in the following statement and then give a proof. Suppose k is a positive integer. If kn + 1 objects are distributed into n boxes, then some box must contain at least of the objects. Exercise Suppose that 88 chairs are arranged in a rectangular array of 8 rows and 11 columns, and suppose 50 students are seated in this array (1 student per chair). (a) Prove that some row must have at least 7 students. (b) Prove that some column must have at most 4 students Nonexistence Proofs. Suppose we wish to establish the truth of the statement xp (x), which is equivalent to x P (x). One way is to assume there is a member, c, of the universe of discourse for which P (c) is true, and try to arrive at a contradiction. Example Prove there does not exist an integer k such that 4k + 3 is a perfect square. Proof. Proof by Contradiction: Assume there is an integer k such that 4k + 3 is a perfect square. That is, 4k + 3 = m 2, where m is an integer. Since the square of an even integer is even and 4k + 3 is odd, m must be odd. Then m = 2a + 1 for some integer a. Thus, 4k + 3 = m 2 4k + 3 = (2a + 1) 2 4k + 3 = 4a 2 + 4a + 1 4k + 3 = 4(a 2 + a) = 4(a 2 + a) 4k 2 = 4(a 2 + a k) 1 = 2(a 2 + a k) But this contradicts the fact that 1 is an odd integer.

12 2. METHODS OF PROOF 80 In order to show some property is false for every member of the universe of discourse it is almost always best to try to use a proof by contradiction. Example illustrates a property of the integers that can be easily proved in this way. Exercise Prove: There does not exist a positive real number a such that a + 1 a < The Halting Problem. Example The Halting Problem: There does not exist a program which will always determine if an arbitrary program P halts. We say the Halting Problem is undecidable. Note that this is not the same as determining if a specific program or finite set of programs halts. This is decidable. Proof. We simplify the proof by only considering input-free programs (which may call other procedures). Assume there is a program called Halt which will determine if any input-free program P halts. Halt(P) prints yes and halts if P halts. Halt(P) prints no and halts otherwise. Now we construct a new procedure. procedure Absurd if Halt(Absurd) = yes then while true do print ha Notice that the procedure Absurd is input-free. Now we consider two cases. Case 1 If Absurd halts then we execute the loop which prints unending gales of laughter, and thus the procedure does not halt a contradiction. Case 2 If Absurd does not halt then we will exit the program, and halt. Again, this is a contradiction. Now the only assumption we made was that a program exists which determines if any program will halt. Thus this assumption must be false. There is no such program Counterexample. Counterexample to xp (x): We may disprove a statement of the form xp (x) by finding a counterexample. That is, use the equivalence xp (x) x P (x), and find a c in the universe of discourse for which P (x) is false.

13 2. METHODS OF PROOF 81 From Example one might be led to think that n 2 n + 41 is a prime number for every natural number n. After all, it worked for the first 41 natural numbers. (Or so, you were led to believe. Did you finish the remaining 35 cases?) Showing that a predicate P (x) is true for a few, perhaps many millions of x s in its universe of discourse, however, does not constitute a proof of xp (x), unless you were able to exhaust all possibilities. This, of course, is not possible if the universe of discourse is an infinite set, such as the set of natural numbers or the set of real numbers. Since the negation of xp (x) is xp (x) x P (x), it only takes one x for which P (x) is false, a counterexample, to disprove xp (x). The assertion for every natural number n, n 2 n + 41 is prime is, in fact, false. Exercise Find a counterexample to the statement: For every natural number n, n 2 n + 41 is prime Biconditional. In order to establish the truth of the statement p q, use the fact that (p q) is equivalent to (p q) (q p), and prove both implications using any of the previous methods. We conclude this module with a discussion on proving a biconditional or if and only if statement. As pointed out above, a proof of a biconditional requires two proofs: the proof of an implication and a proof of its converse. Our example below is very similar to theorems we have proved earlier. The point here is that the two implications may be proved independently of each other, and the decision on the best strategy to use should be made for each one separately. Example Prove: For any integer n, n is odd if and only if n 2 is odd. In order to prove this statement, we must prove two implications: (a) If n is odd, then n 2 is odd. (b) If n 2 is odd, then n is odd. Proof of (a): We give a direct proof of this statement. Assume n is an odd integer. Then n = 2a + 1 for some integer a. Then n 2 = (2a + 1) 2 = 4a 2 + 4a + 1 = 2(2a 2 + 2a) + 1, which is twice an integer plus 1. Thus, n 2 is odd.

14 2. METHODS OF PROOF 82 Proof of (b): We give a proof of the contrapositive of this statement: If n is even (not odd), then n 2 is even (not odd). Assume n is an even integer. Then n = 2a for some integer a. Then n 2 = (2a) 2 = 4a 2 = 2(2a 2 ), which is an even integer. Exercise Prove the following statements are equivalent. (1) n 5 is odd. (2) 3n + 2 is even. (3) n 2 1 is odd. Hint: Prove the following implications: (1) 1 2 (2) 2 1 (3) 1 3 (4) 3 1

Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or

CHAPTER 3 Methods of Proofs 1. Logical Arguments and Formal Proofs 1.1. Basic Terminology. An axiom is a statement that is given to be true. A rule of inference is a logical rule that is used to deduce

M3210 Supplemental Notes: Basic Logic Concepts In this course we will examine statements about mathematical concepts and relationships between these concepts (definitions, theorems). We will also consider

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

Chapter 1 Mathematical Logic In its most basic form, Mathematics is the practice of assigning truth to welldefined statements. In this course, we will develop the skills to use known true statements to

LOGICAL INFERENCE & PROOFs Debdeep Mukhopadhyay Dept of CSE, IIT Madras Defn A theorem is a mathematical assertion which can be shown to be true. A proof is an argument which establishes the truth of a

Oh Yeah? Well, Prove It. MT 43A - Abstract Algebra Fall 009 A large part of mathematics consists of building up a theoretical framework that allows us to solve problems. This theoretical framework is built

Logic, Sets, and Proofs David A. Cox and Catherine C. McGeoch Amherst College 1 Logic Logical Statements. A logical statement is a mathematical statement that is either true or false. Here we denote logical

Basic Proof Techniques David Ferry dsf43@truman.edu September 13, 010 1 Four Fundamental Proof Techniques When one wishes to prove the statement P Q there are four fundamental approaches. This document

MATH 337 Proofs Dr. Neal, WKU This entire course requires you to write proper mathematical proofs. All proofs should be written elegantly in a formal mathematical style. Complete sentences of explanation

Logic and Proof Solutions Question 1 Which of the following are true, and which are false? For the ones which are true, give a proof. For the ones which are false, give a counterexample. (a) x is an odd

CHAPTER 4 Applications of Methods of Proof 1. Set Operations 1.1. Set Operations. The set-theoretic operations, intersection, union, and complementation, defined in Chapter 1.1 Introduction to Sets are

DISCRETE MATHEMATICS W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1982, 2008. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It is available free

MATH 55: HOMEWORK # SOLUTIONS ERIC PETERSON * 1. SECTION 1.5: NESTED QUANTIFIERS 1.1. Problem 1.5.8. Determine the truth value of each of these statements if the domain of each variable consists of all

Math 3000 Running Glossary Last Updated on: July 15, 2014 The definition of items marked with a must be known precisely. Chapter 1: 1. A set: A collection of objects called elements. 2. The empty set (

CHAPTER 6 Proof by Contradiction We now explore a third method of proof: proof by contradiction. This method is not limited to proving just conditional statements it can be used to prove any kind of statement

Section 1.5 Methods of Proof 1.5.1 1.5 METHODS OF PROOF Some forms of argument ( valid ) never lead from correct statements to an incorrect. Some other forms of argument ( fallacies ) can lead from true

Introduction to mathematical arguments (background handout for courses requiring proofs) by Michael Hutchings A mathematical proof is an argument which convinces other people that something is true. Math

Chapter 3 Cartesian Products and Relations The material in this chapter is the first real encounter with abstraction. Relations are very general thing they are a special type of subset. After introducing

4CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL: SETS, FUNCTIONS AND MATHEMATICAL INDU 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques The purpose of this section is to study the proof technique known as mathematical induction.

Chapter 3 Proof 3.1 The Nature of Proof We begin with a philosophical discussion on the nature of proof. When a person is arrested for a crime and brought to trial, it is assumed that the prosecution has

Math 305 Fall 011 The Density of Q in R The following two theorems tell us what happens when we add and multiply by rational numbers. For the first one, we see that if we add or multiply two rational numbers

3.3. INFERENCE 105 3.3 Inference Direct Inference (Modus Ponens) and Proofs We concluded our last section with a proof that the sum of two even numbers is even. That proof contained several crucial ingredients.

CHAPTER 4 Direct Proof It is time to prove some theorems. There are various strategies for doing this; we now examine the most straightforward approach, a technique called direct proof. As we begin, it

MAT2400 Analysis I A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions In Analysis I there is a lot of manipulations with sets and functions. It is probably also the first course where you have to take

LESSON 1 PRIME NUMBERS AND FACTORISATION 1.1 FACTORS: The natural numbers are the numbers 1,, 3, 4,. The integers are the naturals numbers together with 0 and the negative integers. That is the integers

1.5 Methods of Proof INTRODUCTION Icon 0049 Two important questions that arise in the study of mathematics are: (1) When is a mathematical argument correct? (2) What methods can be used to construct mathematical

Chapter 1 Introduction to Proofs 1.1 Preview of Proof This section previews many of the key ideas of proof and cites [in brackets] the sections where they are discussed thoroughly. All of these ideas are

ORDERS OF ELEMENTS IN A GROUP KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let G be a group and g G. We say g has finite order if g n = e for some positive integer n. For example, 1 and i have finite order in C, since

Lecture 3 Mathematical Induction Induction is a fundamental reasoning process in which general conclusion is based on particular cases It contrasts with deduction, the reasoning process in which conclusion

Chapter 1. Logic and Proof 1.1 Remark: A little over 100 years ago, it was found that some mathematical proofs contained paradoxes, and these paradoxes could be used to prove statements that were known

Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF To be able to understand mathematics and mathematical arguments, it is necessary to have a solid understanding of logic and the way in which known facts can be combined to prove

CHAPTER 7 Proving Non-Conditional Statements The last three chapters introduced three major proof techniques: direct, contrapositive and contradiction. These three techniques are used to prove statements

CONSTRUCTION OF THE FINITE FIELDS Z p S. R. DOTY Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned solely with questions about the set of integers Z = {0, ±1,

CSI 2101 / Rules of Inference ( 1.5) Introduction what is a proof? Valid arguments in Propositional Logic equivalence of quantified expressions Rules of Inference in Propositional Logic the rules using

WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT? introduction Many students seem to have trouble with the notion of a mathematical proof. People that come to a course like Math 216, who certainly

Chapter 11 Number Theory Number theory is one of the oldest branches of mathematics. For many years people who studied number theory delighted in its pure nature because there were few practical applications

Propositional Logic and Methods of Inference SEEM 5750 1 Logic Knowledge can also be represented by the symbols of logic, which is the study of the rules of exact reasoning. Logic is also of primary importance

Congruences Robert Friedman Definition of congruence mod n Congruences are a very handy way to work with the information of divisibility and remainders, and their use permeates number theory. Definition

Chapter 5 Set Theory 5.1 Sets and Operations on Sets Preview Activity 1 (Set Operations) Before beginning this section, it would be a good idea to review sets and set notation, including the roster method

Chapter 3 Predicate Logic Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere. A. Einstein In the previous chapter, we studied propositional logic. This chapter is dedicated to another

Induction Margaret M. Fleck 10 October 011 These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition 1 Introduction to induction At the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing

Proof: Proof: We suppose... that 3n + 7 is even. that 3n + 7 is even. Since n is odd, there exists an integer k so that n = 2k + 1. that 3n + 7 is even. Since n is odd, there exists an integer k so that

CHAPTER 2 Logic 1. Logic Definitions 1.1. Propositions. Definition 1.1.1. A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true (denoted either T or 1) or false (denoted either F or 0). Notation:

73 0 Sequences and Series 6. Approximate e 0. using the first five terms of the series. Compare this approximation with your calculator evaluation of e 0.. 6. Approximate e 0.5 using the first five terms

CHAPTER 7 Introduction to Relations 1. Relations and Their Properties 1.1. Definition of a Relation. Definition: A binary relation from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. If (a, b) R we say a is related

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

Section 4. Number Theory 4.. Introduction This section demonstrates some different techniques of proving some general statements. Examples: Prove that the sum of any two odd numbers is even. Firstly you

CHPTER 12 Functions You know from calculus that functions play a fundamental role in mathematics. You likely view a function as a kind of formula that describes a relationship between two (or more) quantities.

+a 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers. Definition 1.1. (Sequence) A sequence is a function with domain N. Example 1.2. A sequence of real

CHAPTER 2 Inequalities In this section we add the axioms describe the behavior of inequalities (the order axioms) to the list of axioms begun in Chapter 1. A thorough mastery of this section is essential

Chapter 4 Set Theory A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One. (Georg Cantor) In the previous chapters, we have often encountered sets, for example, prime numbers form a set, domains

Chapter 2 Set Theory 2.1 Sets The most basic object in Mathematics is called a set. As rudimentary as it is, the exact, formal definition of a set is highly complex. For our purposes, we will simply define

An Innocent Investigation D. Joyce, Clark University January 2006 The beginning. Have you ever wondered why every number is either even or odd? I don t mean to ask if you ever wondered whether every number

8.7. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 8-135 8.7 Mathematical Induction Objective Prove a statement by mathematical induction Many mathematical facts are established by first observing a pattern, then making a conjecture

CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems Numbers play an important role in almost all areas of mathematics, not least in calculus. Virtually all calculus books contain a thorough description of the natural,

CHAPTER 1 Logic, Proofs 1.1. Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false (but not both). For instance, the following are propositions: Paris is in France (true), London

Section 3 Sequences and Limits Definition A sequence of real numbers is an infinite ordered list a, a 2, a 3, a 4,... where, for each n N, a n is a real number. We call a n the n-th term of the sequence.

3.3 Proofs Involving Quantifiers 1. In exercise 6 of Section 2.2 you use logical equivalences to show that x(p (x) Q(x)) is equivalent to xp (x) xq(x). Now use the methods of this section to prove that

Propositional Logic This lecture marks the start of a new section of the course. In the last few lectures, we have had to reason formally about concepts. This lecture introduces the mathematical language