In This Issue of Archives of Internal MedicineFREE

OPIOID DOSE AND DRUG-RELATED MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH NONMALIGNANT PAIN

This population-based nested case-control study investigated the relationship between opioid dose and related mortality among Ontario, Canada, residents with nonmalignant pain eligible for public drug funding. Gomes et al found that a high daily dose of opioids is associated with large relative and absolute increases in opioid-related mortality. In particular, doses exceeding 200 mg of morphine (or equivalent) were associated with a nearly 3-fold risk compared with lower doses (<20 mg of morphine or equivalent). These findings have important implications, largely because the majority of opioid deaths were avoidable and occurred in young people (aged 43 years at death, on average).

STRUCTURED INTERDISCIPLINARY ROUNDS IN A MEDICAL TEACHING UNIT

Teamwork is essential to providing safe hospital care, yet few studies have evaluated efforts on general medical patient care units. O’Leary et al conducted a controlled trial of an intervention, Structured Inter-Disciplinary Rounds (SIDR), implemented on 1 of 2 similar medical teaching units in a tertiary care academic hospital. The intervention combined a structured format for communication with a forum for regular interdisciplinary meetings. A retrospective review of 555 medical records, using both a concurrent and historic control, found a significant reduction in the adjusted rate of adverse events (adjusted rate ratio, 0.54 [P = .005] and 0.51 [P = .001], respectively). The authors conclude that SIDR is an effective strategy to improve patient safety on general medical patient care units.

Early aggressive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improves outcomes but carries increased risk. This study examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to standard risk stratification in early RA. Using a decision analysis model, the authors estimated 1-year and lifetime quality-adjusted life-years, RA-related costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (“with MRI” compared with “without”) for patients with RA with fewer than 12 months of disease and no baseline radiographic erosions. The authors report that under plausible clinical conditions, adding MRI to standard risk stratification is unlikely to be considered a cost-effective addition to currently available tests according to commonly cited cost-effectiveness thresholds.

ELECTRONIC PATIENT MESSAGES TO PROMOTE COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Screening reduces colorectal cancer mortality, but effective screening tests remain underused. Sequist et al conducted a randomized controlled trial of electronic patient messages for 1103 patients in 14 ambulatory health centers. Patients aged 50 to 75 years who were overdue for screening were randomly assigned to receive a single electronic message within a personal health record that highlighted their overdue screening status and provided a link to an online tool to assess their personal risk of colorectal cancer. Screening rates were higher at 1 month for patients who received electronic messages compared with those who did not (8.3% vs 0.2%; P < .001), but this difference was no longer significant at 4 months (15.8% vs 13.1%; P = .18). Among 552 patients randomized to receive the intervention, 296 (54%) viewed the message, and 47 (9%) used the Web-based risk assessment tool. One-fifth of patients (19%) using the risk assessment tool were estimated to have above-average risk for colorectal cancer.

PHYSICIANS RECOMMEND DIFFERENT TREATMENTS FOR PATIENTS THAN THEY WOULD CHOOSE FOR THEMSELVES

Suppose you faced a choice between 2 treatments, one of which gave you a better chance of surviving a potentially fatal disease but at the cost of several very unpleasant adverse effects. Would you opt for this treatment? What if you were a physician recommending a treatment to a patient. Would you recommend the same treatment you chose for yourself? This national physician survey shows that in these kinds of situations, physicians recommend different treatments to their patients than they would choose for themselves.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Percentage of physicians selecting the option with the higher mortality rate.

Tables

References

Correspondence

The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with
the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.

Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Your quiz results:

The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted

For CME Course:
A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this
CME course.

Instructions

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Internal Medicine editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.

Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.

* = Required Field

Comment Author(s)* (if multiple authors, separate
names by comma)

Example: John Doe

Affiliation & Institution*

Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.

This feature is provided as a courtesy. By using it you agree that that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the AMA's Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this article will not be shared, sold, traded, exchanged, or rented. Please refer to The JAMA Network's Privacy Policy for additional information.

Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.

What is this ?

Article rental gives users the ability to access the full text of an article and its supplementary content for 24 hours.
Access to the PDF is only available via article purchase.