To improve the performance of our website, show the most relevant news products and targeted advertising, we collect technical impersonal information about you, including through the tools of our partners. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy. For a detailed description of the technologies, please see the Cookie and Automatic Logging Policy.

By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.

You can withdraw your consent using the method specified in the Privacy Policy.

A report put out by a UK parliamentary committee on Wednesday hints that Russian and Chinese hackers may have interfered in last year's Brexit referendum. Simon Ruwhof, professional hacker and independent IT security consultant, told Sputnik that such claims are completely unsubstantiated.

On Wednesday, the parliamentary Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) published a report on the 'Lessons Learned from the EU Referendum'. In a section of the report dedicated to cybersecurity, the committee warned that it was "deeply concerned" over "allegations of foreign interference" in the run-up to the Brexit vote.

Commenting on the crash of a key voter registration website just days before to the referendum, the Committee emphasized that it could "not rule out the possibility that the crash may have been caused by a DDOS (distributed denial of service attack) using botnets."

Admitting that "has no direct evidence" to support the claim, PACAC noted that "it considers…it important to be aware of the potential for foreign interference in elections or referendums."

And although the report does not directly accuse any country of involvement, it does point to Russian and Chinese approaches to cybersecurity, and how these differ from those of the US and the UK, thus hinting at these countries may have somehow been involved in a DDOS attack on the voter registration website.

The Cabinet Office, which commissioned its own report on the crashed website, told the BBC that its findings were that that the crash was caused by too many users on the site at once.

"We have been very clear about the cause of the website outage in June 2016. It was due to a spike in users just before the registration deadline," the Cabinet Office's statement to the BBC stated. "There is no evidence to suggest malign intervention. We conducted a full review into the outage and have applied the lessons learned. We will ensure these are applied for all future polls and online services," it added.

The Cabinet Office's investigation notwithstanding, the PACAC is recommending that the government, the UK's electoral commission, GCHQ and other agencies "establish permanent machinery for monitoring cyber activity in respect to elections and referendums, for promoting cyber security and resilience from potential attacks…"

Speaking to Radio Sputnik about what to be the latest allegation in a never-ending series of 'Russian hacking' claims, Simon Ruwhof, an independent IT security consultant and professional hacker, explained that he was not impressed with the report.

"[From] what I've seen in the evidence in the news articles supporting these claims with regard to the United Kingdom's Brexit [vote], it's not substantiated that Russia interfered. I would like to see more evidence of this claim from the UK's members of parliament," the expert noted.

Furthermore, Ruwhof stressed that even if the claims of a hack were warranted, "it's very hard to attribute a specific cyberattack to a country" in such cases. "So the accusation that Russia or China might be behind these attacks is I think speculation, and not based on facts."

The cybersecurity expert recalled that there have also been a lot of rumors and insinuations in his country — the Netherlands, about Russia's alleged manipulation of the recent Dutch elections via 'fake news'. "There is a lot of rumor and speculation, but not a lot of evidence that substantiates that Russia or China might be behind the attacks."

Remainers want any excuse to try & explain the Brexit vote. Brits wanted freedom it is that simple https://t.co/MnfPB7ROQ0

Ultimately, Ruwhof suggested that it could be seen as normal for lawmakers to speculate and spread rumors, since most of them have no actual understanding of cybersecurity issues. "This is just normal behavior for people in parliament. They don't know anything specific about cyberattacks, and they just give their opinion. I don't think there's anything bigger behind it," he said.

Finally, the expert pointed that the UK authorities had extended the voter registration process for two days following the website's outage, meaning that in the long term, the fact that it went offline in the first place didn't actually any effect on the Brexit's results.

"But it's an important case," Ruwhof admitted. "I think we should keep computers and websites completely out of the democratic voting process, as these make the process quite vulnerable and open to all kinds of attacks. I think that within a democratic election process, there should be no doubt over the results."

By clicking the "Post" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your Facebook account data to enable you to comment to the news on our website using this account. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.

By checking this box, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your personal data to create an account on the Sputnik website for posting comments to news. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
You can withdraw your consent by using the feedback form or the method specified in the Privacy Policy.

* All fields are required

Please confirm your e-mail to continue. Confirmation instructions have been sent to

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.