All posts in category The Syndicate

Note: url not active yet. Special thanks to Jules for taking me on board the UCY.TV platform, and for all her hard work.

What’s to be found under the rose?

This show will be loosely designed around the recent release of my book, STRAWMAN, in order to learn and unlearn so many of the false truths we have been masterfully mislead with, in movements that never actually move, and with occasional guests to delight the palette.

It’s all in the name.

Tune in, because you’re already dead,
and what you don’t know is keeping you that way.

Archives to be stored at UCY.TV and Youtube, and at: CorporationNationRadioArchives.wordpress.com.

The time has come that, at least for now and the near future, I am retiring this blog. It will not be actively contributed to anymore by myself. Now, please allow me to explain why.

I feel that I have reached the end of this particular journey. And though my future path remains unclear as of this moment, I have faith that this past journey and the heartbreak it has caused me was not only necessary, but that it will also lead myself and perhaps others to a better place. I am in these strange days at a conscious fork in the road, under what some may call technologically (artfully) the final days of whatever life as we have pretended to know and accept it is.

The following is literally a walkthrough of my time on this earth as an activist turned writer, filmmaker, and radio guest and host. Some of the links provided below have likely not been seen by most of my readers, a personal history lost in the shit-pile of Youtube feces and tabloid nonsense. This is my history (his story) as publicly recored, for better and for worse, and as it remains in that digital ether like the story of a child growing up and out of his own societal, political, and religious delusions.

My future, my path, depends on you. I will either be able to print my life’s work, my new books, or I will not. I will either use those reference books as my tool or I will not. And as for myself, I will either fade away into the obscurity we were birthed into or I will overcome it. Honestly, this option to fade away (or burning out) sounds like a much easier path right about now. And so I am posting here what may very well be my last post on this blog. I am posting here my life story as an activist, writer, filmmaker, radio show host, and guerrilla journalist, all of which I have funded out of my own already empty pockets.

And so Iam asking you the reader, watcher, and listener just what my work has been worth to you?

There are currently 1861 subscribers to this blog. It receives an average of between 500-700 readers per day that click on one of 241 published posts representing uncountable hours of research. A total of 1,422,654 views have occurred over this blogs 7 year history, all of them without charge and certainly without profit and gain for the benefit of their author (figures as of Aug-01-2016). And so I am asking, for the second and last time, that my readers support this tome of research and work by donating to my cause. All donations will be applied solely towards the private printing of my books. If every subscriber donated just $10 today I would reach my goal instantly.

But I have nothing left to offer and certainly nothing to sell, except what I have already given away for free and what I will continue to offer freely in the future. The book is already posted for free download here: StrawmanStory.info, with Volume II soon to follow and be added to the first.

Please donate (click) here:

Or my P. O. Box is at:

Clint Richardson1192 East Draper Parkway #124Draper, Ut 84020

–=–

If you would like a paperback copy of the book, please follow the instructions at the StrawmanStory.info home page, as this would be a purely private, non-commercial exchange.

Here, let me attempt to answer the question as to why you should make a donation.

I can only walk you through my story here, and can only offer my charitable life’s work and research below as the answer to that question. And so below is my personal walkthrough of just that.

I have poured my heart and soul into ten years of dedicated, full-time research, media, and activism, as is evidenced by this extensive blog. I have given the fruit of my labors freely without exception or expectation. I have suffered ridicule and fallacious personal attacks on my character by cowardly persons unknown, unseen, and unmet, and by those who hide behind false names and flattering avatars and titles for reasons I cannot fathom; a paid and usefully unpaid idiocy. I lost one email account and am apparently losing current emails into the nothingness of the cloud. I have had strikingly unreasonable rebukes, a strange absence of searchable content on search engines like Google, and just all around opposition (controlled and otherwise) for telling the untainted Truth that very few want or are capable of hearing. Though few seem to be seeking healthy debate or discussion, many are willing to throw stones and cause stumbling blocks from afar. I suppose this has become the American way, wearing our ignorance like a badge of courage. Hell, no government (mind control) is needed when we are each others own stumbling blocks and worst enemies.

Much of what I had uncovered years ago is now being recognized, propagandized, and institutionalized through an obfuscating normalization process. For instead of being outrightly hushed, it is being brought into public light slowly, as entertainment, so as to protect the pharmaceutical and medical industries that are ultimately responsible for spreading all modern disease through various forms of inoculation, including vaccination.

“After decades of research, scientists think they finally know what turns prions – healthy proteins inside our brains – into the infectious,virus-like pathogens that cause ‘mad cow’ disease, and have also been linked to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s…“

In Truth, this information has been known for decades, intentionally buried by drug companies under actuarial profit projections and insurance matrixes without responsible or even cautious recall. The careless results of such insured and government-approved and licensed irresponsibility (malpractice insurance) certainly could have been avoided if it were not for the religious worship of vaccination and other medical nightmares, which purposefully deliver cross-species infection and the RNA-based DNA reprogramming that leads to cancers and so many other diseases through such unnatural inoculations. Even this article is chalk full of misleading statements, never putting the blame upon the pharmaceutical companies that have hand delivered most modern diseases directly into our veins through the monetarily induced and brainwashed, licensed nurses and doctors that prescribe them, posing as if wasps stinging their prey to deliver their own burden of poisons and parasites.

Pulitzer Prize winner Richard Rhodes warned us in the 1980’s with his book “Deadly Feasts” about this modern, government and medically-induced plague, along with Patrick Jordan and myself (2011-12) intimately exposing it in this new century with 1,000’s of hours of primary research and radio shows on the subject. The amount of suffering that could have been and still can be averted is not qualifiable in blogosphere soundbites. This open secret is kept merely to protect the deliverers of these infectious prions and their profitable “big pharma” corporations, even as most modern “dementia” type dis-ease has in fact been shown to be some form of prion dis-ease as an otherwise impossible cross-species infection. They actually call this “prion misfolding,” which is just another word for “evolution” (the unfolding of man and beast). But who would listen to a lowly old blogger and an obscure couple of unpublished authors that voluntarily sacrificed their entire livelihoods to literally save the population from its own ignorant trust in flatteringly titled, legal “doctors” and the regulatory agencies of government that “educate” and license them in their practice of spreading disease through professional prescription?

Evolution, or as polio vaccine inventor Jonas Salk called it, The Unfolding Of Man, is not merely some random act of Nature. It is a purposeful infection (by a penetrating needle sting) that causes healthy cells to be mis-folded into whatever RNA structure is infecting and reprogramming its functionality and form. This evolution is often called cancerous growth. For instance, the scrapie prion of sheep causes mad-cow disease in cattle, as the genetic programming of the sheep prion attempts to reprogram the specifically and proprietarily naturally programmed cow prion, evolving it and thus causing the symptoms of doctor and drug-induced evolution. This process is called prion misfolding, and foreign prions (all prions of all other species) are called “infectious” for this reason, as they attach to healthy, proprietary (host) prions and literally evolve (unfold) them into copies of their foreignly programed selves.

I do not use this word evolution lightly. This is not a sophomoric religious or scientific debate. This is the real deal. The evil elements in this world have found a way to literally evolve us through these deadly and pretended-to-be incurable, infectious prions. This is the weaponization of the very design of life itself, the purposeful altering of prion proteins that are designed to, by their own source of nature and in a foundational way, protect us from so many special diseases, including most forms of cancer. But these diseases can only happen in man and beast when purposeful cross-species contamination takes place, and only man can contemplate and manufacture such evil in the name of unnatural, unspiritual “science” and “medicine.”

EVOLUTION –noun – [Latin evolutio.] The act of unfolding or unrolling. 1.A series of things unrolled or unfolded; as the evolution of ages… 4. In military tactics, the doubling of ranks or files, wheeling, countermarching or other motion by which the disposition of troops is changed, in order to attack or defend with more advantage, or to occupy a different post.

EVOLVE –verb transitive – evolv’. [Latin evolvo; e and volvo, to roll; Eng. to wallow.] 1.To unfold; to open and expand. The animal soul sooner evolves itself to its full orb and extent than the human soul. 2. To throw out; to emit. – verb intransitive – To open itself; to disclose itself.

EVOLVING –participle present tense – Unfolding; expanding; emitting.

EVOLUTE – noun – An original curve from which another curve is described; the origin of the evolent.

EVOLVENT – noun – In geometry, a curve formed by the evolution of another curve; the curve described from the evolute.

EVOLVED –participle passive – Unfolded; opened; expanded; emitted.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

Jonas Salk, inventor of the injectable, inactivated live-virus polio vaccine that spread so much infectious disease (including polio) around the world due to the un-filterable protein (infectious prion) and DNA strands of Simean Monkey Virus #40 (SV-40) and other infectious cancer viruses mixed with other biological-unfolding agents, later released a selection of very telling books based on his research into this purposeful evolution of life, some of those titles being “Man Unfolding” and “Infectious Molecules and Human Disease.“

The actual history of his ilk’s work is still underreported and ignored as fools line up in droves to accept their devil-in-a-white-coat’s inoculative tribute from nurses that know not the first thing about these pharmaceutical weapons they are paid to deliver under licensure by those syndicalist, organized crime dealers of purchased degrees and diplomas.

–=–

“Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection.”

–Dr. Albert B. Sabin, inventer of oral or “sugar cube” polio vaccine

–=–

“…nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine.”

–Jonas Salk, inventor of the first polio vaccine,
testimony before a Senate subcommittee

–=–

“Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin Polio Vaccines, being made from monkey kidney tissue, has been directly responsible for the major increase in leukaemia in this country.”

–Dr. F. Klenner, MD

–=–

“90% of polio cases were eliminated from statistics by health authorities’ redefinition of the disease when the vaccine was introduced, while in reality the Salk vaccine was continuing to cause paralytic polio in several countries at a time when there were no epidemics being caused by the wild virus.“

–Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

–=–

“Not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations (a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959), but the statistics were manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.”

–1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, excerpt of the testimony of Dr. Bernard Greenberg, Head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health

–=–

“We now know that chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis in England) is not a new disease, but simply an ‘aborted form’ of the more serious paralytic polio…“

That the sustained use of polio vaccines for over 40 years has resulted in:

The vaccine for any dis-ease offers no positive healing factor, instead merely presenting an evolution or devolution of that dis-ease’s regiment of symptoms. As Patrick Jordan points out, to cure is to preserve, not to heal. We cure dead animals for later consumption by applying salt or other chemicals. We cure hay as well with salts, preventing its natural petrification but never allowing it to grow as if it were not already attacked and killed at its roots, left to a slow, decomposing death. But this is not healing, for the zombie dead that we are being turned into simply cannot be healed, only preserved (cured).

And though no vaccine manufacturer has ever made any claim or proven to “cure” any disease through vaccination, one must consider that zombies must also be cured so that their dying, petrifying bodies do not fall apart by the man-made diseases that caused their inconvenient disposition. We are certainly being cured in this villainous sense by these pharmaceutical corporations, for to alter the very DNA structure of man and beast, the symptoms of such man-made evolutionary changes must be managed. The body must be made to persevere through its forced alteration into that which is incompatible with Nature. It must be supplemented with poisons and chemical polymers and compounds that are otherwise unusable to the properly folded (un-evolved) man. We are as pieces of patented, copyrighted art being kept by museum curators, our altered and evolved genes continuously re-registered as government property, even as we mutate exponentially into our unwitting, transhumanist future.

For Charles Darwin, we find the term “descent” used in place of evolution in his first offering of “The Descent of Man” (1871), just one year before his “Origin of Species” attempted to fulfill the anti-theist’s wet dream.

It is ironic that this very tool of genetic and unique, non-nucleatoid protein manipulation that is the foreign (infectious) prion actually proves that evolution is quite naturally impossible in the way that Darwin theorized, and that only the adversarial (evil) and artful designs of the sciences of man may forcibly alter the very fundamental designs of Nature (God). The protective element of our natural, inheritable, healthy prion structure is the best and most sound evidence against Darwin’s origin of species argument. We simply cannot tolerate the cells of other species in our bodies, for their very RNA script and programming is diametrically opposed to our own. Hell, we can barley survive our own blood-types being crossed in normal reproduction without man’s interference though pharmacopeia to deaden our immune system that registers a forming baby of a foreign human blood-type as a foreign infection to be destroyed as a systematic dis-ease. Thus, to even suggest this foolish evolutionary theory as sound when considering this modern prion plague is outlandishly ridiculous, for infectious prions to humans are merely the healthy, normally occurring prions of other species. To each species lies its own origins. And to claim knowledge of those origins is only the false imaginations of idolatrous, want-to-be gods.

One of the most spiritual aspects and teachings of the Bible is simply that man can never know the origins of that which is his or any other source of True Existence. This humbling, self-evident knowledge is what drives insane men on such foolish errands in the flattering title of “science.” But the only Truth is that we will never know. We are not supposed to know. We are only supposed to live as we were intended to and by the very protective Design Nature allows. To question the integrity of that design and to seek improvement upon it is the greatest folly of man, who’s modern consciousness seeks only advancement and growth without reason or end. Our lot in life is to protect, not to alter our own Nature.

DESCENT – noun – 1. The act of descending; the act of passing from a higher to a lower place, by any form of motion, as by walking, riding, rolling, sliding, sinking or falling. 2.Inclination downward; obliquity; slope; declivity; as the descent of a hill, or a roof. 3.Progress downward; as the descent from higher to lower orders of beings. 4.Fall from a higher to a lower state or station. 5. A landing from ships; invasion of troops from the sea; as, to make a descent on Cuba. 6.A passing from an ancestor to an heir; transmission by succession or inheritance, as the descent of an estate or a title from the father to the son.Descent is lineal, when it proceeds directly from the father to the son, and from the son to the grandson; collateral, when it proceeds from a man to his brother, nephew or other collateral representative. 7.A proceeding from an original or progenitor. The Jews boast of their descent from Abraham. Hence, 8. Birth; extraction; lineage; as a noble descent. 9. A generation; a single degree in the scale of genealogy; distance from the common ancestor. No man is a thousand descents from Adam. 10. Offspring; issue; descendants. The care of our descent perplexes most. 11.A rank in the scale of subordination. 12.Lowest place. 13. In music, a passing from a note or sound to one more grave or less acute.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

At some point, man becomes unman. At some point, man becomes a proprietary creation of man. At some point, man is no longer a creation of God (the Source of Nature) but an invention of a corporation (artificial person) under the authority of the government that corporation (person) is registered in. That time is upon us. We must choose our master, man’s designer A.I. machine or God’s Nature.

But this “unfolding” is not merely biological, for the mind and moral compass of man’s development must also be evolved to meet the changing nature of these so-called “sciences,” of transhumanism and other unnatural developments as the evolution or unfolding of man continues as an unabated “science.” One does not teach men born to be slaves the language of their masters, lest the carefully divided classes become equals and sit at the same tables. Of course, “education” is the best method towards unfolding (evolving) the impressionable young minds of all men so that they may come to culturally accept such scientific madness as a normality, and even as if it were the natural evolution of man. And are we not seeing just that, as new generations are being systematically confounded and reprogrammed to accept this artificially induced evolutionary process of augmented reality? For the the concept of a New World Order is merely the combining of all that stands in opposition into togetherness, a fusion of the real and unreal, life and non-life, spirit and flesh.

–=–

The Unfolding of Man. Research Note. Educational Policy Research Center – 67-47-

Author: Naranjo, Claudio

“Material gathered from education, religion, medicine and related fields comprises this practical approach to dealing with human development. The unity underlying the multiplicity of ways of growth (150 educational methods or systems) is a recurrent theme. This unity transcends the seemingly diverse intentions of education, psychiatry, and religion. The author contends that close scrutiny may uncover enough of a meeting ground to warrant the ambition of a unified science and ART OF HUMAN CHANGE. Indeed, a consistent view of man’s development will fuse the three currently separated disciplines. The author suggests a phenomenological approach to practical ways of personal growth which provides an experiential meeting ground for diverse techniques, exercises and procedures that would contribute to the UNFOLDING OF MAN. His approach is intended to elucidate two things: (1) THE UNITIY OF SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS VIEWS CONCERNING THE PROCESS OF THE UNFOLDING OF MAN;and (2) the unity of various methods of achieving human growth from the standpoint of experiences these methods elicit, rather than from their external descriptions. (TL)”

Notice here folks: that’s a government website; an “educational” website. That’s the goal of the modern Common Core principle. Government controlled education… no wonder people are patriotic towards their own military occupier and destroyer, for it controls their intake of knowledge and thus hides its own intent. The pawns actually believe they are kings.

This is a multi-front attack. The A.I. is on. All systems go.

Of course the official “education” system will dispense with True religious and moral teaching towards the improved and evolved teaching of man’s scientific control of perceived “chaos” through this artificial, neo-humanistic order birthed from it. Man’s very soul must be misfolded with worthless fruit, the unnatural and seedless (groundless) information from that tree of the good and evil conceptualizations and inventions (fictions) of man.

One last note on this subject:

As I am not credentialed or respected by this official, consensus-based, syndicalist organized criminal element, and proudly so, I will put my thesis here. It is one that can change the world, and thus probably won’t go much further than this page. It is simply that prions prove Darwin’s theory of “natural” evolution to be completely false. In fact, it is this forced, unnatural evolution (unfolding) of man through prion misfolding that shows some form of “design,” be it “intelligent” or otherwise. This is not the point. The point is that cross-species transmission of these smallest of proteinaceous agents is infectious, causing great dis-ease to the host body. In other words, the symptoms are a sign that under no circumstances can two species be compatible, let along derived from each other. If man came from ape, then man’s body should be receptive to its source protein structure and biological programming. But it is not. In all cases of xenotransplantation (animal to human body part replacement) the immune system treats that special part as a foreign infection, and so the immune system must be nullified through pharmacopeia (witchcraft, potions, and poisoning) for the body to accept any foreign transplant. They simply are not compatible in a “natural” way. Thus “natural” evolution, at least as the “origin of species,” is bunk. Cancer is a symptom of evolution, for cancer is a direct response of the body to foreign (non-human) DNA programing, sometimes referred to as cancer “viruses.”

–=–

Viruses that can lead to cancer

Viruses are very small organisms; most can’t even be seen with an ordinary microscope. They are made up of a small number of genes in the form of DNA or RNA surrounded by A PROTEIN COATING.A virus must enter a living cell and “hijack” the cell’s machinery in order to reproduce and make more viruses. Some viruses do this by inserting their own DNA (or RNA) into that of the host cell. When the DNA or RNA affects the host cell’s genes, it can push the cell toward becoming cancer.

–=–

You’ll notice that most “cancer viruses” are from monkeys and other animals, which must be manually (purposefully) injected into the human body to cause infection, or transplanted in some other way. Other viruses that cause cancer, such as HPV, are also foreign agents, in this case a “wart” passed from human to human. The supposed HIV virus is another example, extremely similar to feline immunodeficiency virus (i.e. the supposed cause of feline AIDS), which can only cause disease when injected into the body, either through transmission or other cross-species contact. Whether it is actually a sexually transmitted disease is not clear or proven, and I have never known an unvaccinated (or non-intervenious drug-user) or other “blood product” user via inoculation of foreign or human blood pharmaceuticals to have the symptoms of AIDS or cancer.

This trend in cancer rates was documented in its early stages just after the turn of the 20th century:

–=–

“Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with COWPOX vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.“

–Dr. W.B. Clarke, a prominent physician in Indiana, from Eustace Mullins ‘Murder by Injection,’ pg 132, quoting The National Council for Medical Research, Virginia

–=–

And so I reiterate Dr. Clarke’s respected opinion here when I say that evolution was practically unknown until vaccination became commonplace, and that most modern diseases are in fact the symptoms of cross-species infection through vaccination. Whether vaccination “works” or does not is irrelevant at this point. For it is how they are grown and the delivery of unfiltered proteins and DNA that is the subject at hand. This has nothing to do with the theory of “vaccination” and everything to do with cross-species contamination. There is no left or right, right or wrong. There is only the fact that most of us have been infected with the DNA and prion proteins of many, many different species that vaccine cell substrates are grown on! To this fact, every vaccine insert warns us! This is wholly against every aspect of the Natural Law, the scriptural Law, and the law of reason. To this fact there is no debate.

–=–

“Eaten blood is digested into its components so it ceases to be blood, and the body re-uses the components for different things. Transfused blood is not digested but functions as blood with all its vital properties for life.”

“For the life of the flesh is in the blood…”

—Leviticus 17: 11, 14, KJB

—=—

“VARIVAX [Varicella Virus Vaccine Live (Oka/Merck)]

VARIVAX… is a preperation of the Oka/Merck strain of live, attenuated varicella virus. The virus was initially obtained from a child with natural baricella, then introduced into human embryonic lung cell cultures, adapted to and propagated in embryonic guinea pig cell cultures and finally propagated in human diploid cell cultures (WI-38). Further passage of the virus for varicella vaccine was performed at Merck Research Laboratories (MRL) in human diploid cell cultures (MRC-5)…

Each 0.5 mL dose of vaccine contains the following… residual components of MRC-5 cells including DNA and PROTEIN.“

—Except taken directly from VARIVAX insert from actual vaccine package

–=–

The FDA is certainly aware of all this, and has been for a long time. It is a protective agent not for us, but for the corporations that government invests in and controls. The reader should ask themselves why vaccines are allowed to be used on the public and on pets when this type of information is readily available. But then, the reader would have to lose such fallacies as patriotism and love of country (love of artificial persons). We’s have to face reality, which is just too painful…

–=–

“Potential Risks of DNA in Vaccines

“Residual DNA in vaccines derived from tumorigenic cells, including those transformed by Ad5, can pose potential risks to the vaccine recipient in two respects: oncogenicity and infectivity. Each of these biological properties must be considered and evaluated for each cell substrate.

“The oncogenic risk of cell substrate DNA has been considered to be due to several mechanisms. First, the residual DNA could have dominant activated oncogenes that could exert their effect following expression in recipient cells. In the case of Ad5-transformed cells, the dominant oncogenes would include the E1A and E1B genes. Second,the incoming DNA could integrate into the host genome in certain genes, such as the p53 gene or the retinoblastoma susceptibility (RB) gene, termed tumor suppressor genes, which are involved in cell cycle control among other cellular processes.Loss of function of tumor suppressor genes has been associated with certain human tumors. Third, integration of residual cell-substrate DNA could result in the activation of cellular regulatory genes by promoter/enhancer insertion, and this could result in the development of a neoplastic phenotype; this mechanism for tumor development was initially described in chickens for leukemia formation by avian leukosis viruses. Another result of integration that has been described is an increased methylation of adjacent DNA sequences as well as sequences on other chromosomes, although the consequences of such changes in methylation patterns to a cell are unknown.

“The second biological activity of DNA that should be considered is its potential infectivity.If a genome of a DNA virus or the provirus of a retrovirus is present in the cell substrate used for vaccine manufacture, then the residual DNA has the potential, upon inoculation into the vaccine recipient, to produce infectious virus from this DNA and thus establish a productive infection.

“The assessment of the risk of DNA — both the oncogenic risk and the infectious risk — needs to be considered both in terms of (1) the amount of residual DNA inoculated; and (2) the concentration of oncogene or infectious genome present in this DNA…

“In considering potential risks associated with the use of these so-called Designer Cell Substrates – i.e., neoplastic cells derived from normal human cells transformed by defined viral or cellular oncogenes or by immortalizing cellular genes (e.g., telomerase) – OVRR/CBER is considering the approach outlined below within the framework of a “defined-risks” assessment… “A defined-risks approach to the regulatory assessment of the use of neoplastic cells as substrates for viral vaccine manufacture”, In EVOLVING Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Cell Substrates for Vaccine Development… The use of immortalized,neoplastic human cells as substrates to develop recombinant viral vectors as vaccines also raises theoretical concerns with regard to possible contamination with TSE/BSE(Human/transmissible form of Mad Cow Disease) agents.”

—FDA article from FDA website entitled “‘Designer’ Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines”

–=–

We are being unwittingly evolved!

We marvel and cringe at the effects of “mad cow disease,” which is merely a prion disease caused by vaccinating (stinging) a healthy cow with infectiously programed sheep prions, and yet we treat our own madnesses called as the many names of “dementia” as somehow expected, age-related, and naturally occurring. We suffer this evil like good little patients, paying for “cures” that do not work from the very industry that intentionally knowingly infected us in the first place.

But then, the word patient is one of my favorite words, for we have no clue that we are patients of government from our birth. In fact, a citizenship is nothing more and nothing less than a patient of a government institution.

PATIENT –adjective – pa’shent. [Latin patient.] 1.Having the quality of enduring evils without murmuring or fretfulness;sustaining afflictions of body or mind with fortitude, calmness or christian submission to the divine will; as a patient person, or a person of patient temper. It is followed by of, before the evil endured; as patient of labor or pain; patient of heat or cold. 2.Not easily provoked;calm under the sufferance of injuries or offenses; not revengeful. Be patient towards all men. 1 Thessalonians 5:14. 3.Persevering; constant in pursuit or exertion; calmly diligent. Whatever I have done is due to patient thought. 4. Not hasty; not over eager or impetuous; waiting or expecting with calmness or without discontent. Not patient to expect the turns of fate. – noun – A person or thing that received impressions from external agents; he or that which is passively affected. Malice is a passion so impetuous and precipitate, that it often involves the agent and the patient.1.A person diseased or suffering bodily indisposition. It is used in relation to the physician; as, the physician visits his patient morning and evening. 2. It is sometimes used absolutely for a sick person. It is wonderful to observe how inapprehensive these patients are of their disease. –verb intransitive –To compose one’s self. [Not used.]

–=–

What the hell are you all waiting for so patiently???

Now we must remember, only what is a unique or novel creation of man can be patented as property of man’s person (a franchised legal status of government). And the only cure for the disease of man’s law is to be only the property of God’ Nature (Creation). This isn’t religion, it’s common sense. It the Highest LAW, the Law of Nature! And it is completely tainted by the false doctrines of the corporate church, which is merely an authorized, non-profit agent and artificial person of the state, the very state that wishes to become your involuntary god (creator) and master. When man is no longer man, when his genes and genome are newly created, patented property of government and its syndicalist corporate structure, then we will be born slaves. We will carry our person (status) in our very unnatural, trans-human design, the mark of proprietary beasts. For we will have allowed ourselves to deny our own Nature, our own place within God, and instead to become a creation of man.

—=—

“The products of man’s imagination and undisciplined appetite may have a boomerang effect which in due time may well overpower him.”

—Jonas Salk, from: ‘Man Unfolding’

—=—

It is not difficult to understand at all. It’s real simple… Because we are not “religiously” following the Law of Nature, which is laid out succinctly in the Bible, and because we have thus lost respect for the very Laws (Design) of Nature Itself as we try and alter and improve upon them through unnatural evolution, we are dooming ourselves to a literal hell on earth. We are allowing ourselves to be controlled utterly by devils (attorneys).

DEVILING –noun – A young devil. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEVILLING – A term used in London of a barrister recently admitted to the bar, who assists a junior barrister in his professional work, without compensation and without appearing in any way in the matter.(Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DEVIL’S HORNS – When managers focus on an undesirable trait.They do not see future and current success potential. (Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DEVIL –noun – Devl. [Latin, to calumniate.] 1. In the Christian theology, an evil spirit or being; a fallen angel, expelled from heaven for rebellion against God; the chief of the apostate angels; the implacable enemy and tempter of the human race. In the New Testament, the word is frequently and erroneously used for demon. 2.A very wicked person, and in ludicrous language, an great evil. In profane language, it is an expletive expressing wonder, vexation, etc. 3.An idol,or false god.Leviticus 17:7. 2 Chronicles 11:15. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMON – …Evil spirit or genius, which influences the conduct or directs the fortunes of mankind. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMONIAC, DEMONIACAL or DEMONIAN – adjective – 1. Pertaining to demons or evil spirits. 2. Influenced by demons; produced by demons or evil spirits. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMONIAC – Phrensy. – noun – A human being possessed by a demon; one whose volition and other mental faculties are overpowered, restrained, or disturbed, in their regular operation, by an evil spirit, or by a created spiritual being of superior power. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CALUMNIATE – verb transitive – [See Calumny] To accuse or charge one falsely, and knowingly, with some crime, offense, or something, disreputable; to slander. – verb intransitive – To charge falsely and knowingly with a crime or offense; to propagate evil reports with a design to injure the reputation of another.(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CALUMNY –noun – Slander; false accusation of a crime or offense,knowingly or maliciously made or reported, to the injury of another; false representation of facts reproachful to another, made by design,and with knowledge of its falsehood; sometimes followed by on. Neglected calumny soon expires. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

Which demons possess you?

Would you even know as an evolved, unfolded pseudo-man?

What false gods do you allow to bedevil and calumniate you?

Just who or what are the devil’s advocates?

Trust me when I say that truth is way stranger than any church fiction…

For what you may not have comprehended quite yet is that we are speaking here of biological slander, a rewriting of our Source program, as the propagation of evil designs upon our very genomic structure. We are being bewitched and bedeviled at the cellular level, calumniated to an end that will cause us to be abhorrent to our Natural Source, and instead to one made by the design of these evil geniuses (human devils). We are being made criminals from God and Nature, chimeras that must be bound and chained for our offensive natures. Words will no longer be needed in this charge, for our crimes will be spelled out in our DNA sequence chains.

You see the great mystery is that all the monsters in the Bible, as well as all the saints, are just various forms of man. Man is the only species that acts against its own Nature and best interests. And so even as you cry foul and weep at the loss of this world you still refuse to pick up the one book that would save your very life and soul. For the designs of these devils in suits and ties and white lab coats is to make you into mere animals, which translates to soulless beasts, a purposefully designed lack of anima. The Bible is an instruction manual on how to avoid these devils, especially the ones that lurk in the church and state.

–=–

“Devilling, as the period of pupillage or training to become an advocate is generally known, lasts between eight and nine months, and comprises a mix of skills training courses and time spent working with a devilmaster. The compulsory skills training courses, which are described in more detail in the following pages, are spread across the devilling period and last for about nine weeks in total. For the balance of the period of devilling,devils work closely with their devilmasters.

“All devils have a principal devilmaster who is a practicing member of the junior barof at least seven years standing, and working primarily in civil practice.Devils will also spend part of the time with another devilmaster practicing in the criminal courts, and many devils spend a short period of time with a third devilmaster working in a different aspect of civil work from his or her principal devilmaster…

“The Faculty of Advocates is a body of independent lawyers who have been admitted to practice as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. Faculty records date as far back as 1532when the College of Justice was established by an Act of the Scottish Parliament,though its origins are believed to predate that event.”

—Copied from from official UK website (advocates.org.uk), explaining the act of ‘Deviling’, and finally excerpted from its main “about” page. It is important to note that though this information on the “deviling” page was specifically removed in late 2015, but that its origin remains. This excerpt is taken from a 111 page publication entitled “The Devil’s Handbook,” 12th Edition, 2014/15, published by the Faculty of Advocates, Advocates Library, Parliament House, Edinburgh EH1 1RF

–=–

This is no joke! This is a government publication and is excerpted from a government website. This is the true nature of the umbrella of the International Bar Association (IBA) and its many national members.

But let us not go too far astray. For I have uncovered so much more of this artful design, and have removed the vail and barrier of popular debate from the equation. Debate is the great mountain of obfuscation, which, by its official rules, requires one to protect lies and stand in defense of what one does not believe in. This is professional debate, a tool used to train priests, politicians, and attorneys, or what I call the modern Pharisees.

I knew the debate on what are popularly named as “chemtrails” was over and pointless, for instance, when I found that the most “prestigious” universities around the world were teaching “Geo-Engineering” of the land, air, and seas and offering professional degrees and diplomatic papers (diplomas) therein. No geo-engineering or chemtrail skeptic can overlook the fact that this monster of organized crime against nature, which by illusion labeled (named/noun) as the sponsored and regulated “education” system of government, is offering degrees and therefore a requirement for legal licensure in geo-engineering the entire planet! The debate, I found, was merely a smokescreen as obvious to the senses as the chemtrails themselves, designed to make the common man believe not even his own eyes.

And so we find that all we have been exposing for so many years, decades in fact, is now the subject of dinner conversation and climate change discussions, as we – the boys who supposedly cried wolf – are now conveniently forgotten instead of just outright ignored.

Here is a perfect example of the respect garnered to these false, flattering titles of mega-corporations, as that which is allotted to this syndicalist “education” monopoly of the state. Under the top 10 rankings of schools and universities is listed each one by rank of prestige, with an imaginary, non-referential “score” placed next to each institution as its numerical ranking according to that pretended, apparitional quality of prestige. Ironically, most folks would actually choose which schools they wish to attend by these so-called rankings in “prestige” having no idea the actual root meaning of that word.

LEGERDEMAIN – noun – [See Light.] Slight of hand;a deceptive performance which depends on dexterity of hand; a trick performed with suchart and adroitness,that the manner or art eludes observation. The word is sometimes used adjectively; as a legerdemain trick.

PRESTIGIATOR – noun – A juggler; a cheat.

PRESTIGIATORY – adjective – Juggling; consisting of impostures.

PRESTIGIOUS – adjective – Practicing tricks; juggling.

IMPOSTURE – noun – [Latin impostura. See Impose.] Deception practiced under a false or assumed character;fraud or imposition practiced by a false pretender. —Form new legends, And fill the world with follies and impostures.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

What is a university but a clearing house of the victor’s falsified histories and instructions in fictional, artful things? What are they but government approved and censored agencies permitted to teach the acknowledgements of men, the synthesis of all things exposed to the filters of these institutions of that Hegelian Dialectic. Oh, how we have been tricked by the magical spellings and artful images (idols) of historical figures that sought only to defeat True knowledge attainment by the masses of illiterates. The dark light of the legerdemain wordsmith, scientist, and mathematician enlightens not the soul, but instead drives it into an adversarial state to stand against its own True Light and Nature.

To quote again, strangely enough, from my own upcoming “Volume II” of the “Strawman” book series:

“In etymology, the English word prestige stems from the word “trick,” taken from the 16th century French prestige, meaning “deceit, imposture, illusion,” and in the Modern French “illusion, magic, glamour.” From the Latin praestigium we get the meaning of “delusion, illusion” as is used for the adjective “prestigious.” Prestige was a derogatory term until the 19th century, where it was applied to Napoleon within the sense of his having politically a “dazzling influence” in 1815.

To be described as prestigious from the 1540’s was to be one who partook in “practicing illusion or magic” and was “deceptive,” stemming from the Latin praestigious as “full of tricks,” and from praestigiae meaning “juggler’s tricks,” which was likely altered by dissimilation from praestrigiae, and from praestringere meaning “to blind, blindfold, dazzle,” from prae “before” (same as pre-) added before stringere “to tie or bind” (as the verb to strain). Again, this was a derogatory term until the 19th century.

This notion of garnering state papers that show degree of education as a diploma (diplomatic papers) is comparable to the noun cachet, meaning a “seal affixed to a letter or document” from the 16th century, stemming from the Old French dialectal cacher “to press, crowd,” and from the Latin coactare “constrain” (cache). The French term lettre de cachet, meaning “letter under seal of the king,” made the evolutionary linguistic transliteration as a “(letter under) personal stamp (of the king)” to the modern word “prestige.”

A diploma is simply permission from the state to commit a certain degree of crime while acting in the states fictional (legal) persona; to take upon the surname a flattering title that would be unlawful to possess and profess for those not brainwashed by the syndicalist education monopoly.

In fact the etymological meaning of the very word education is shockingly defined from the 1530s as, “childrearing,” equivalent to “the training of animals,” from Middle French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” the noun of action from past participle stem of educare (educate). The origin of education was as the instruction in social codes and manners; the meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.

Let’s face it, all beasts of burden, including, as the U.S. Code repeatedly defines us, “man and other animals,” need to be trained for our place in animal husbandry and human trafficking under this human capital management system.

But hey, don’t worry, after reading this work you can always beg to be re-educated and placed back into the prestige of that fictional matrix of civil “life.” Just believe…

As for the intent of this institutionalized corporate structure of public education, it is to pre-strain an individual, meaning to limit knowledge to a particular direction or practice. The verb strain comes from around 1300, meaning to “tie, bind,fasten, gird,” from the present participle stem of Old French estreindre “bind tightly, clasp, squeeze,” from the Latin stringere meaning “draw tight,bind tight, compress, press together,” and also “to stroke, rub, press” with cognates from Lithuanian stregti “congeal, freeze, become stiff;” Greek strangein “twist;” Old High German strician “mends nets;” Old English streccian “to stretch;” and from German stramm and Dutch stram meaning “stiff“). From late 14th century it takes the meaning of “tighten; make taut,” and also to “exert oneself; overexert (a body part),” with the sense of “press through a filter,put (a liquid) through a strainer” also from early 14th century, while the meaning of “to stress beyond measure, carry too far, make a forced interpretation of” is from mid-15th century.

Ultimately, the university accreditation system is merely an authoritarian, for-profit monopoly that stands both as the barrier of true knowledge and as the forced source of officially bestowed permissive ability to participate or practice in most regulated commercial functions of government. The word authority, as it applies to the university school system, literally stems from autorite “book or quotation that settles an argument,” from the Old French auctorité “authority, prestige, right, permission, dignity, gravity; the Scriptures.” The Modern French autorité, from the Latin auctoritatem (nominative auctoritas), has the meaning of “invention, advice, opinion, influence, command,” from auctor “master, leader, author.” Most poignantly, this word authority from the late 14th century has the meaning of “power to enforce obedience,” and as “people in authority” is from the 1610s. Authorities in modern times was recorded as “those in charge, those with police powers” since the mid-19th century.

The song lyrics Teach Your Children Well comes to mind. For to have power over “education” by promoting the word-trickery of prestige over governmental institutions, this monopoly on knowledge can be retained by those keepers of mysteries in high authority. Oz can thus remain hidden behind a curtain of idiocy spelled out as a pretended history (his-story) in those prestigious text books.

The monopoly of education is dystopia.

Utopia cannot stand or thrive on ignorance.”

–=–

It is an amazing feeling to realize that the “professors” of “professions” are really just full of their own peers’ manufactured shit, corrupted to their capacity on the fiction of artful concepts and spoiled fruit from the fig-apple tree of worthless knowledge, being passed on to future generations just as it was “educationally” passed on to their animal selves. Imagine the arrogance it takes to accept a “masters” degree in anything taught by those who as well received their own “masters” degree from another manufactured “master” and so on. That a 23 year old “adult” can be awarded a certificate of “mastery” in anything is as ridiculous as the Mormon “Church” corporation sole assigning the flattering title of “elder” to 12 year old kids and doing so not in their christian name, but in their legal surname, totally against the scriptures. This is how flattering titles (names) are used, carrying no substance of the reality they formally represent (in artificial form/character/person/title), just as the clothes do not make the man. Mastery is a lifetime achievement, and one often recognized publicly only after the death of that master. A “Masters” degree, however, is currently on sale for $99,999. It is a name, a title, not a reality. Education, position, and status for sale; a devil’s contract of monetary and performance debt. To the cheater, to one raised to be a cheater and to summarily respect the prestige of university word magic and legerdemain trickery without question, it is par for the course that one should fallaciously flaunt a piece of paper sealed by the state so as to cheat even themselves out of ever Truly mastering anything at all, aside from their assigned and professed degree of crime and aptitude in their chosen, commercially professed fiction. Such professions are like invisible prisons for the mind, with humility nowhere to be found and where cognitive dissonance blossoms.

Likewise, to have a Masters in the English language is about as reasonable as having a prize for the most prestigious dingleberry in ones upper butt crack, professing oneself to a state-sanctioned mastery of what Mark Twain called the most “mongrel” language, a literalist word construction known also as “dog-Latin,” which was grammatically built for the purpose of mass public deception and illiteracy. The names of things we learn at 3 years old never change throughout our commercial livelihoods, for the metaphor and the parable is completely lost on the publicly educated, literalist English speaker, while their legal and “Romantic” origins reak havoc upon society. We learn the empty monetary value of all things by their names (nouns), but never the substance and essence of that which is enslaved by such artificial valuation and empty nomenclature. Strangely, we only know words by their name, not their substance or True meaning and Nature. And this explains the foundation of all our problems.

—=—

“So, we start with the question, now, as to why we cannot ask the question why? And that is because of the absence of knowledge of first cause… At school, for instance, we learn to liken words to objects. But even when we apply the word to the object, we have lost something. We have lost inner-meaning.We call things by the name. We say this is a “carrot.” And we therefore get a good mark on our examination paper. But what is a “carrot?” Neither the student nor the teacher knows, actually. It becomes merely a term to define the fact that we have accepted the language which we are studying, and that in that language, this particular vegetable is a “carrot.” But this does not tell us a thing about the “carrot.” It only divides it from some other vegetable. Why it is divided, how it is divided, what the life means, we do not know. But from the very earliest times, human beings attempted to find ways of learning the true meaning of the things which they classified… They made likenesses of the thing they were trying to discover or decide. And in this way they had a little more dimension than we get from words… Words have to be carefully considered and weighed. They can be the cause of war. They can result in riots. They can bring down the stock exchange in a bad catastrophe. They can do all kinds of things to us that we cannot appreciate or understand. And just as we are not permitted by law to injure other persons physically, we must sometimes realize that we can more profoundly influence and injure them verbally… Now,children today aren’t taught basic language. They are taught the names of things,and believe that (because) they have the name that they know the thing. So that if someone asks them, what is a “carrot,” they are apt to say “a vegetable,” and get the correct mark. But they don’t know what a character is, or a “carrot,” or anything else. They do not understand,but they consider the subject closed by the name. And the same is true in many different levels and developments of life. We give names to things, answer them according to their names, and consider that enough. This is one of the points that was made… in connection with education; the problem of finding out the names of things in terms of meaning. And the way to gain meaning is to recognize the basic vitality of the subject under discussion… In other words you have to be able to feel the facts of a thing, not merely listen to it and buy dictionaries.You have to participate in the experience of something in order to know it. And that was why such an emphasis was placed upon pre-school education. The problem is very certain that the faculties of true understanding have to be developed before schooling comes, or the schooling will be very largely rejected. We will finally end up with the individual memorizing the words and knowing nothing about the substance.So the person has to learn to recognize substance first.And the first substances of life are not learned in school, but in the pre-school period of childhood in which the association with adults or with others of its own age group, these result in certain basic experiences of like and dislike, of exception and acceptance and rejection. These things we gradually learn intuitively, then when education comes, we give meaning to words. Otherwise we give no meaning, and we just keep on using words without giving them any substance, essence, or vitality…“

“Historians, of course, use words to influence the reader. And it is generally admitted today that 90% of history is written by victors at the expense of the vanquished.And we always make a villain out of the loser, regardless of circumstances. So, we have all kinds of problems in history. We take the words; we believe them.But we don’t know whether they are true or not… We decide that the historian is correct if we agree with him. He is incorrect if we disagree with him. When in reality the facts of the matter are seldom actually considered.”

—Manly P. Hall, from his recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”

—=—

Today’s “historians” seem to have been metamorphosed into bloggers and shock jocks on radio, news outlets, and newspapers, and as actors in Hollywood. Historical “facts” are delivered sometimes even before modern events ever happen. And so it is safe to embrace Mr. Hall’s perception that 90% of history, including that being broadcast and recorded instantly and live on the spot, is likely only the sponsored and paid for opinions of a powerful propagandist regime we call as our government. This model goes well with Huxley’s opinion that 90% of the population is quite hypnotizable in different degrees. No one seems to want to face the Truth that we are a morally, spiritually, and educationally defeated people. For that would mean inevitably that we are as well a militarily conquered people, and that our so-called government is actually the victor of this information war.

Fortunately in my own journey, my early research uncovered this design in totality. And I found that the definition of that word “conquer” actually carries the same meaning as the word “purchase,” and that the word “military” simply means thee entirety of the “Executive” enforcement branch of government. Let us not pretend that their money system, which no one can seem to deny, has certainly conquered us all. For the very industries that this government sanctioned education system grants degrees of crime and licensed (anarchical) diplomacy to are also the private and public stock corporations that government collectively owns through its international investment schemes. For it only seeks the most impressionable, hypnotizable of fools to fill with the most human of false pride those flatteringly titled positions of tenure and public employment. Only he who is most impressed and indebted by the word magic and prestige of their own paid-for educational experience will be accepted into bearing such prestigious flattering titles of professional and nonsensical conduct, bound in every way by their original performance debt of citizenship in agency to that principal government.

And so the reader should pay close attention to my much earlier, foundational research into CAFR’s, which shows government to be the main shareholder of ALL important and influential corporate stock through its non-governmental and pension investment schemes in all corporations around the world, especially in those pharmaceutical companies that have caused so much destruction of life and health in all nations and tribes.

To be clear, the regulator (government) regulates the corporations it owns through stock investment and indirectly votes (as collective shareholder) through proxy vote for the boards of directors, mergers and acquisitions, and other corporate governance issues. The regulator regulates its own corporate empire, a syndicalist domain of pure and utter “legalized” corruption. When government is the main or even partial shareholder of corporations as the design of “fascism” is said to be, and when the highest law of corporations is to protect its shareholders, then its oil companies are not made to clean up their spills and its pharmaceutical companies are allowed to lie to the public and kill in the name of scientific medicine in the name of profit and gain. And this is why primary research is so important, for they do not lie to government, only to us.

Of course, to be published one must cover up the Truth, which is why journals never do what we have done, explaining the entire cover-up publicly for full comprehension. When government owns through stock investment and voting powers the totality of mainstream media that, if it were actually independent, would otherwise criticize and report all aspects of the organized crime of government, then one should immediately recognize this conflict of interest and turn away from such an obvious propaganda outlet.

While Project Mockingbird is well known and even blatantly admitted on the CIA’s own website, we must realize that this sort of clandestine infiltration into the media is no longer necessary. For when government owns the majority holding of stock, it calls the shots by proxy. And those board members for which it collectively votes into each corporate boardroom certainly will not depose the hand that owns and feeds it. For the shareholders also proxy vote and approve salaries, raises, and bonuses for those syndicalist members of its held corporations.

But it is fun to remember when at least we believed the organized crime was on the outside, that it was imported into these media companies instead of being merely homegrown and quite expected and business as usual…

–=–

“You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month.”

–CIA operative, discussing the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great, by Deborah Davis

–=–

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals,scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.“

“There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don’t need to manipulateTime magazine, for example, because there are [Central Intelligence] Agency people at the management level.“

–William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, briefing members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

–=–

“The Agency’s relationship with [The New York] Times was by far its most valuable among newspapers, according to CIA officials. [It was] general Times policy ... to provide assistance to the CIA whenever possible.“

–The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

–=–

“The history of the CIA’s involvement with the American press continues to be shrouded by an official policy of obfuscation and deception for the following principal reasons:

■ The use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence‑gathering employed by the CIA. Although the Agency has cut back sharply on the use of reporters since 1973 primarily as a result of pressure from the media), some journalist‑operatives are still posted abroad.

■ Further investigation into the matter, CIA officials say, would inevitably reveal a series of embarrassing relationships in the 1950s and 1960s with some of the most powerful organizations and individuals in American journalism.

Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were Williarn Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the LouisviIle Courier‑Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company (ABC), the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), the Associated Press (AP), United Press International UPI), Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Heraldand the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.

By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc.“

“If even one American overseas carrying a press card is a paid informer for the CIA, then all Americans with those credentials are suspect… If the crisis of confidence faced by the news business—along with the government—is to be overcome, journalists must be willing to focus on themselves the same spotlight they so relentlessly train on others! …When it was reported… that newsmen themselves were on the payroll of the CIA, the story caused a brief stir, and then was dropped.”

“Over the past several years, the Bush administration has learned that it can engage the press in an adversarial way, and the public won’t mind. It’s yet another step in MANAGED NEWS…“

“Senator William Proxmire has pegged the number of employees of the federal intelligence community at 148,000… though Proxmire’s number is itself a conservative one. The “intelligence community” is officially defined as including only those organizations that are members of the U.S. Intelligence Board (USIB); a dozen other agencies, charged with both foreign and domestic intelligence chores, are not encompassed by the term… The number of intelligence workers employed by the federal government is not 148,000, but some undetermined multiple of that number.”

–Jim Hougan, ‘Spooks’

–=–

“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a POLICY-MAKING ARM of the government… I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into PEACETIME cloak and dagger operations.“

–Former President Harry Truman, 22 December 1963, one month to the day after the JFK assassination, op-ed section of the Washington Post, early edition

–=–

Now, how do you think this type of government infiltration of the CIA could happen? The answer is that no infiltration never really needed to happen. All corporations are government-created corporations, registered under the commercial protection of government, and the maxim of law states clearly that protection requires subjection. That goes for all subjects, all public (registered) citizenships (natural persons) and corporations (artificial persons). The government funded, floated corporate bonds, and over the years invested in the majority stock of all media and other corporations. The stockholders thus collectively and in consensus through private, non-governmental associations (NGOs) voted for the boards of directors of all those media corporations and in turn the governmentally hand-picked board of directors votes for their CEOs. And the conglomeration and monopolies formed since were simply government proxy shareholder votes pooled together for supporting mergers and acquisitions, as well as loose regulation and deregulation of such otherwise unlawful trusts.

Of course the CIA is the media. Duh!

This is syndicalism.

The regulator protects itself by protecting that which it has an interest in and which is also subject to its laws, never allowing the Truth to spill over in any comprehensible way for public consumption. And so when we out here independently without papers and pedigrees expose this stuff publicly we are made to appear like crazy nut-balls without perspective by those trained lapdogs, and our lack of syndicalistic “credentials” apparently means that our neutral research should be dismissed outright, despite the fact that all of it is the officially sourced materials of government unstarched for and thus unseen by the average person, as that which is never publicized in any revealing or talked about way. Most just pull out their imaginary copy of the constitution and beat it over our heads, pretending it was created for the common subject. More idiocracy, fro the preamble lets us know exactly who created the constitution and who its legacy is inherited to.

As George Carlin comedically but with all due seriousness and integrity stated:

–=–

“The real looting in this country takes place in the transfer of the wealth from the poor to the rich… and the poor have been systematically looted in this country. The rich have been made richer under this criminal, fascist president and his government.”

—George Carlin

–=–

What George didn’t mention is that “the rich” is merely a colloquialism for the bloodline, the private, feudal landholders, the family business, which is the commercial United States. Of course, the common people are still convinced that being a “white person” in law has anything to do with skin color, and that “Barrack Obama” is actually a black person. Silly rabbits, persons aren’t Real. Persons are words on paper. They have no “color” except the ink they are printed with. A person (legal status) is whatever government says it is.

Syndicalism requires both the compartmentalization and the character assassination of any who refuse their grant of credentialism, which includes the imaginary division of races. Never is the True nature information disputed, only the public’s perception of the messenger. Works every time… Hell, people still believe that David Duke is a member and Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazi Party, though almost forty years has passed since that affiliation.

Well then in full disclosure I must therefore admit, I once (and only once) went to a “witchcraft” coffee shop meet-up here in Salt Lake City because I was curious why so many covens existed here around the Mormon corporation, which therefore means I must be witch. But in context, I was interested in the fact that the “profit” (president) of the so-called church was born of Anne Hutchinson, a condemned witch in Salem, Mass, which was posted in a chart at their own genealogy center! Guess they thought no one would look at Mrs. hutchinson history, because now her name is magically vanished from that genealogy chart. Guess that’s what happens when you speak the Truth on local AM radio in the heart of Mormon history!

Of course, the only magic I saw was the miraculous disappearance of any tip for the barrister.

For those interested in the real magic that ails them through the magic wand of the vaccination needle, my initial research and construction of the prion plague can be found here, though most of our more recent research was exposed over the radio:

Patrick Jordon’s continuum of many books, including his latest “The Prion Agenda,” as well as many other sources can be found here: vaccinefraud.com

Examples of Patrick’s and my own many radio shows are linked below, where this evolutionary process through pharma-science “medicine” and the spread of animal and insect prions into the human body is exposed thoroughly. Note that the amount of research put into these shows represents both of our life’s work, and cannot be qualified in any other way.

Oh, and by the way, they are now aerosolizing prions, and my documentary shows why this is perfectly legal. Breath it in, baby…

But by all means, let’s keep ignoring this plague and its promoted delivery system as our friends, family, and eventually our own bodies are degraded and “evolved” (unfolded) in ways unimagined throughout all of modern history, except perhaps in some obscure genres of science fiction. And God forbid that the profits of the medical industry could be harmed by the consequences of such a disclosure. After all, the most profitable gains collected from the spread of disease is only in the treatment of the symptoms that the villainous infector causes, right?

Instead, let us keep doing habitually what the Laws of Nature forbid, polluting and cross-contaminating our bodies with the DNA and infected protein (prions) of every species on the planet through vaccination, including aborted human fetal tissue.

Even more insane, these infectious prions and their antibodies are available for purchase from several biologic companies. For instance, you can buy “GOATANTI HUMAN PEROXIREDOXIN 2 (C-TERMINAL)” here:

This biomedical madness is the thing true terrorism is potentially made of. It’s not even a black market, but quite in the open, where infectious disease and cancerous cells are showcased like whores in the Red Light District. It’s like children (elders) buying unlimited and unregulated candy at the local 7-11. And this anti-human prion plague has been transmitted to every vaccinated man, woman, or child reading this.

While this is just one example of what we have uncovered, sourced in triplicate after years of research collection and cogitation, it may help my readers in empathizing with my own frustration and profound sadness as my life’s research goes unheard and unheeded for lack of my own holding of any soul-eating syndicalist university credentialism. Of course, most of this hell on earth comes directly from that University system, where life itself is being patently (as property) altered (evolved) into some unique (novel) form and catalogued on behalf of government’s investment scheme in the genomic mapping horror film of all life… and subsequently of all that is therefore anti-life.

I explained in full detail, after months of intense research and contemplation, the very DNA of the education system here, how it works and why it would and should be immediately disrespected and dismantled… that is if any rational sense was left over in mankind after our minds have been “unfolded” by these human development and resource (slave) management corporations.

But who among us wishes to discover that our own diploma (legal, diplomatic papers) are only a sign and token of our own agentic conformity, acceptance, allowance, and syndicalism to this completely evil, totally government-funded, conspiratorial education system? Who wants to admit that education is to teach you what to think in a “profession” but not how to think or question its authority, causing one to be licensed and permitted only to profess what government compartmentally allows us to? Who wants to acknowledge that their bought-and-paid-for position of employment and legal status under a legal, flattering title of diplomacy and licensure under the legal state can only be accomplished by loving (believing) or at least pretending to believe and practice in the official story and history that every industry is built around? Who would give up their money, their pensions, their 401k, even when it is patently obvious that all one has was bought purely by filthy lucre?

Who among us that is “successful” because of their “education” and papers is willing to accept that the etymological meaning of the word education is “the training of animals,” the word animal meaning a “soulless” beast of burden or “domesticated pet?” Who wants to admit that their employment is slavery under contract, and that their moral will is decimated by that contract with the devils (attorneys) of those corporations?

Who wants to stand up against the grain to expose the Truth about their very own industry and artificial status (title) within it knowing that their funding and artificial, “professional” respect in that criminal syndicate and paychecks in mammon will be lost? No, it is better that billions suffer and die than to risk that scarlet letter of a true whistleblower.

Ironically, the reason I have nothing, the reason I am “poor” and almost destitute in material things is because I consciously and physically turned away from such false, flattering titles granted by the gods of the state. I turned towards the only Truth, the anti-fiction, slowly moving away from all artifice back into the True Nature of all things. I saw through the names and felt the emptiness of them. My own bought and paid for diploma is worthless for my lack of conformity and tribute to such syndicalism. I allowed myself to feel, to embrace the repulsion I contracted towards my own industry of choice, and to allow the responsibility of my actions to rest upon my own shoulders, not that of the artificial person (corporation) I pretended to be an “moral agent” (employee) of. I quit Hollywood. I quit entertainment. I quit propaganda. I quit making fiction that is adversarial to God and Nature, which in turn bars man’s enlightenment and replaces it with the darkest of false lights.

My particular story is here, a powerful and very personal testimony to the choices we all make and the evils that we pretend don’t exist because of our own participation and syndicalist self-interest in the world of legalism and corporations (artificial personhood). When our jobs truly depend on our being silent to such evils, then we are certainly consenting to and are in legal fact a willing participant of that evil.

Like so many out there still retaining some conscious awareness and still not plagued with pharmaceutical drugs, I used to think that I was somehow different, that something was wrong with me. I wasn’t “normal.” I could not fit into any part of this artificial matrix culture and commercially driven society no matter how much effort I put into the practice. I couldn’t stop asking questions and demanding answers. And so with every educational trade I pretentiously “mastered” I would ultimately cease in its pursuit as a career, recognizing its artful intentions as being purposefully and by design against the best interests of man and Nature. I could not control my sense of righteousness, my strict moral rectitude bounding from within, and thus my words would always get me in trouble as I expressed my True feelings and spiritual Nature in defense of the innocent. Among the Jews of Hollywood, this spiritual strength is a tangible death mark, a black ball, a self-sacrifice. For them, only goyim (voluntary slaves) need apply.

And so this was my journey, continuously uncovering the unnatural and criminal element of all things, both normalized and customary. It led me to join others of like mind, holding up signs and calling bullshit on everything around us, exposing lie after lie without remedy or solution, like a bunch of old men complaining about everything and everyone but themselves, pretending that there was some better time or system we must return to. But no such time actually exists, and all history is a lie. It is in fact this powerful but unprovable belief (faith) in some formerly unseen and better time that causes men in each new generation to never strive to achieve their own mutual perfection, always chasing the historical fallacy of their own tails of their forefathers without comprehension that they were already cut off and attainted at birth.

Below, I have accumulated the history of this last 10 or so years of my journey of discovery, evidential videos and articles of my strange path into the complete absurdity of legal fiction and finance and of the artifice of government. I have done this because, as this very well may be my last post on this blog and because I’m extremely tired and heavy-hearted, broken-hearted, I and am left wondering exactly what all this effort has been worth? Has it changed anything? Has it helped anyone? Have my heavy sacrifices all been in vain? And did I fool myself all this time into believing that I could change the world around me simply by uncovering the lies that surround our collective perception of what that world actually is?

I have raised about a quarter of what I need to raise in order to print in soft-cover book format the conclusion to my life’s work and research. I fearfully anticipated that this would be the case, seeing so many come into this fold only to never find the support of those who praise, criticize, and complain the loudest. And so I am making here one last case, one last cry out for help from anyone who has found value and attained before unknown knowledge from my many works and years of writing, research, and film-making. There are again over 1,800 subscribers on this blog, and the site has had over 1,400,000 views according to its statistics. My movies have been watched by 100’s of thousands, with “Lethal Injection: The Story of Vaccination” for instance having 147,000 views alone, not counting the many mirrored copies and DVDs I encouraged folks to spread freely over Youtube and other outlets, which now cannot be counted.

I am left in awe by the thought of even asking humbly for $1 from each of you in appreciation of the hours, no, years, no, a third of my adult LIFE that it took for me to comprehend and create those documentary films and to research and construct this blog. I marvel at what I could do if I was funded and had a platform unbound by financial constraints, a dream perpetually unrealized by so many like myself, who die the most miserable and unsatisfied men without selling out in conformity to such prestigious powers that pretend to be.

And so I am asking, in this final effort, that anyone reading this please donate what you think my work might be worth. If each reader that subscribes here donated $10 or $20, the price of 2 or 4 of those daily doses of poisonous Starbucks coffees, then I could preserve my book in printed form and hopefully begin a new journey of activism incomparable to this one. And to anyone that seeks a copy of this work once printed, I am still offering it as a gift in exchange for a gift of $30, sort of like a pre-order. It will be printed. The only question is whether or not I must go into personal debt AGAIN just to get my work out there for free!

So please, let me know that all of this was not in vain.

For those unfamiliar with all of my past works, please see all the videos and links below, an incomplete accumulation to be sure but still the strange story of my life and research.

There was a time when I could not have imagined becoming so sensitive in my awareness, that I could actually figure out “the system” and then actually possess the answers to almost every reasonable and even unreasonable question put forward to me. Now that I have reached that point, standing on top of a giant pile of clarified stinky-smelly crap, I realize why so very few arrive here while navigating that shit-storm of false dialectics and popular opinion websites. For to know the Truth one must sacrifice themselves to that ultimate and undeniable Reality, feeling its every pain and pleasure while suffering all the depressions and detachments that naturally must accompany such a transition, for a sacrifice without the purest of Loving intent is merely a loss, a slaughter. One must criticize oneself to no end, realizing and then shedding any fictional notion of legitimacy in ones own employments, status, estate, and memberships. One must despoil any prestige one might profess and pretend. One must Truly take off all the make-up and clothing, all of the false and flattering titles and impressions, the false show and dressings, the pomp and circumstance, so as to finally see oneself in and only as a True Light. It is not as easy as looking in the mirror, for that reflection is always false, 2-dimentional, and without soul, Source, or sense. One must find oneself without such artificial means, no longer seeing without understanding and hearing without listening.

The Truth is not salable. It has no price tag. It cannot be valued in anything but what is the priceless Reality of Nature. Self-evident, Self-Existent Truth is timeless and always defensive, never offensive. It harms only lies and the liars who live by and trust in them. It needs nor requires no debate to Exist. The Truth may only offend fiction, lies, and false beliefs, all of which are offensive to the Truth, and all of which make up a citizenship.

The so-called “truth movement” doesn’t practice actual Truth-telling, for that would be unprofitable. It would require ego-death. It would require admission to our own volunteerism and use, which makes the commercial world go round. Even the principles (maxims) of law legally allow lies to be confirmed and ratified (legal) truths; for black to be white and left to be right, so long as that truth is constituted, contracted, confirmed, ratified, and made “legal,” then believed in (loved) and lived by in the performance debt of membership (citizenship).

Government can lie to the public, but the public cannot lie to government. This was the recent “excuse” offered in support of Hillary Clinton’s lies about her emails to the public.

—=—

“There’s no particular penalty for lying to the public, unless the public get tired of it. But there’s a real penalty for lying to the FBI.”

—Senator Mitch McConnell, speaking on the known fact of Hilary Clinton’s lies to the public about her emails in 2016, speaking honestly to the public on CBS news

—=—

Remember, it is perfectly legal for anyone to lie to the public, including myself, Alex Jones and the rest of the mainstream (pretending to be alternative) media. Fox News even reestablished this fact in court! When your own senator comes out public to reveal that there is no law or sanction (punishment) for government (including a future presidential candidate) to lie to the public, how do you go on supporting and being a subject of that government, of that kingdom and its kings of lies?

Here’s an example of why corporations and agents of government have the right to lie to the public as “free speech” of “artificial persons,” but why “individuals” or “natural persons” (an oxymoron) can never lie to government (owner of the public persons/titles/statuses) we pretend to be.

But what about the news agencies themselves lying to the public? As long as its not a lie told to government, anything goes…

Watch this:

—=—

But “Infowars” would never lie, right?

—=—

And to understand just what “ethics” is in government, and how the legislature actually has no watchers, but instead judge each other in their organized crime, see my expose here, which includes how much they pay themselves. I guarantee once you finish this article you will have no doubt why no actual ethics exist in government.

The “truth movement” does not preach to its listeners the virtue of being (living) at all times in the Natural Truth (within only Nature and under It’s Highest Laws), for then no one would be glued and listening to a damned artificial construct and machine receiver as if it were Real. No one would attach themselves to this fictional, illusionary, virtual online matrix, and would instead embrace their very own Nature and their place within it without such artifice and useless information. The war would only be to keep such information from being spewed in replacement of spiritually driven knowledge. Just as the Church never teaches the True poetic and parabolic verse of the Bible it claims to support and worship, political writers in their prose would never be paid and talking-heads would not be amplified if the subject was what the only self-existent, self-evident Truth actually is. I am a living testament to this fact. Stations and networks would collapse under the weight of deaf ears as we all went out to rediscover the calming frequencies of that uneventful silence of Nature again, the sounds of the True Design of Life uninterrupted by fictional and monetary considerations. Youtube addicts would recede from their electromagnetic programming waves in dark basements and seek instead the tides of the oceans, sunny beaches, and vegetable gardens without commerce. Youtube would be replace with you- topiary. No one would allow themselves to be employed (used in agency as a tool) by another ever again, working only the land for themselves and toward the enrichment and nurturing (True wealth) of all others, realizing the most important Truth that labor is property, and that methodically trading it for money is voluntarily a surrender to evil geniuses (devils); to men with contractual, corporate, artificial power to take what we so foolishly and willingly give. For we would realize that even as new forms of money are promoted to us by such outlets of supposed truth, from gold to “Bitcoin” to the already developing international cashless society of global commerce, that all forms of money require respect and love (belief in) the valuation of that form of money upon all things, that Life and Nature itself can be valued in money, and that money or what it is traded for is never the property of the petty user. To love the pretended substance of money when in Reality it exists only in empty form is the root of all evils. This is the only Truth about money, for that which is not of self-evident Truth cannot ever Exist in any permanence of foundation, but rather only in a purposefully and carefully controlled chaotic flux managed by its demented patenters. For though all things may be valued in money, money is always valued in nothing. This is a maxim (principle) of law. What is valued in money is always corrupted. It is the valuation of the name, the form, the use, and the insurable appearance, but never the substance, the source, and the soul. This is mammon…being not merely that specific tool of money, but the artificial valuation of that which is the priceless, timeless wonder and beauty of Nature. The turning of Source into re-source, including governments corporate structure of commercial human resource management that we call as public citizenship but which is really modern feudalism. Only a slave romanticizes his own enslavement. Only a slave worships and even votes for his next master.

Nature and all life within its realm is priceless, but it may be destroyed when the valuation of mammon is placed upon its bounty, and thus by the mercenaries (soldiers for hire’s) hand it may be sacrificed in pointless slaughter for a price and without Love and respect for its Laws. The soldier is like any other employee in contract to do as his principal instructs and pays for. Of course, the word soldier comes from the Latin word solidus, which was a Roman gold coin. A soldier is a mercenary for pay. There is no other Truth. If that somehow offends you, then you must consider that the undeniable, self-evident Truth offends you. And you may then continue consciously lying to yourself. Pretend all you want that these men aren’t induced into contract with the state to kill and given bonuses, benefits, pensions, and a paycheck.

In the so-called truth-movement, the worst kinds of men are celebrated as “true” heroes. The beauty of finding the only Truth of the Nature of all things is that no longer can words, names, titles, and actions like cold-blooded murderer for pay be twisted into some governmental and propagandist actuarial report and then claimed to be an act of honor. A killer for hire has no honor, even and especially when he is wrapped in the American flag of maritime commerce and war. Give me a militia man fighting for his and his like-minded neighbor’s homeland, family, and spiritual freedom from government without consideration of money and I will show you all respect for that man’s actions. But, as the Bible continuously warns, I will never respect any man due to his false and flattering title of authority, nor his actions taken cowardly there under its artificial persona and protection. There is also no excuse to break the Highest Law of Nature, especially the excuse of that root of all evil and the authority of men in false, fictional, legally flattering titles.

But then, I would need here to show you my huge research project called Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution, perhaps some of my most important work, before this patriotic nonsense and support of that which domestically enslaves us under the Leiber Code could be broken. For a civil war is a war of words, names, and titles, not of men. And the American civil war never ended. I’d have to show you the congressionally confirmed and ratified presidential dictatorship that is the Executive CEO and CIC (president) under emergency military rule before you could see that our military is occupying our civil society and protecting government and its private, landholding bloodline from the multitude of us:

What use is all the gold and oil in the land when the land itself is becoming so polluted and useless that no amount of money can be used to fix it? What use is money if it is not being used to ensure the wealth of all others and to protect the Source of our very own Existence and best interests? What is money without equitableness, without adherence to the Natural Law that forbids such accumulation of wealth beyond need or measure at the expense of all others?

The only Truth about money, the only final winning argument in any monetary debate, is the simple and obvious self-evident conclusion that money is not Real. It is not of Nature; not of Source. No matter how you may cleverly try to justify its existence and its use by some pretended, always fluctuating, temporary value made up by bankers in their own fictional realm, its value can never escape that fictional realm. It is not money that money is evil, but the love (belief) it causes in men to value all things within its purview, even other men as purchasable slaves. This is the temporary power of mammon (valuation) to cause permanent, controllable insanity in “civilized” men.

I believe it is time for me to step away from this nonsensical movement and its pointless, fruitless debates and platforms, a propaganda machine in and of itself that promotes the waving of the national flag (and its law of the sea) of a district of pirates that has kidnapped and interned us all through birth registration and certification with the intent to cause escheat and steal all of our inheritable land. Yet we worship it as if it were a god, even above and totally against the Word in the Bible, the very essence and foundation of the common law. It’s design is to fictionally, “legally” corrupt our blood so that we may never be the prodigal sons we are bloodborn to be. We may never protect the lands of our ancestors, for no heirs are recognized by law, by blood, for no one is being born outside the trappings of the imposts of that national system and district. That which is artificial has no blood, thus he who is surety to some United States person (legal status) certainly has no blood right.

The United States is a horrific corporate machine where the “Made In America” symbol and flag is shamelessly placed upon slave-labor products made in its own federal prisons. Yet no one seems to mind or complain. It is a commercial black hole that promotes legal (artificial) liberty while in reality only offers a commercial franchise called a national citizen-ship that is denizened and so voluntarily incorporated in agency, barely one step above involuntary slavery.

I see no point in documenting the corruption of this strange society in its purposefully induced ignorant state any longer, for the crimes of its agencies and practitioners are never punished, only talked about and loosely recorded as “truth” in the buttcrack of some conspiracy website. The so-called “infowar” is just what its title exclaims it to be, a battle to put worthless, fictional information into each of our collective heads in a total abandonment of God’s Law and Nature. And yet nowhere in all of this supposed truth-telling (convincing us that black is indeed white and left is surely and legally right) are to be found the Laws of Nature, the moral and spiritual Laws that defeat the false powers and corruption of information and mammon, showing it to be merely the artful renditions of the tribe of the name (noun), as fictional persons (corporations), places (legal jurisdictions), and things (property). All of Nature has been re-named (nouns), and so all of Nature has been fictionalized and registered (taxed) by its name (information). The Infowar is not a charitable and loving action of men, but exists only as a for-profit corporation; an artificial person seeking gain by the spread of the useless information of the fictional designs of men. It’s talking heads cannot save you or I, for the only savior is each of our True Selves in our own actions (works) under the Natural Law, under the example of christ. And only the unattained True knowledge of what is the self-evident Truth of Nature both realized and uninterrupted by fictional concepts of the fruit of the tree of conceptual acknowledgement of good and evil will solve any fictional problem. There are only two issues, what is Real and what is artificial (art) posing as Reality. The solution is so simple it hurts, for it is merely to stop respecting art over the Reality it legally, artificially represents. In a nutshell, this is all the scriptures teach us, which is why the church doesn’t ever teach the Bible but instead its own doctrines that justify its corporate existence against the Bible.

I wrote about this strange time we live in, calling it The Great Disclosure, wherein corruption and greed are coming out of the closet and avoiding all consequences, thanks to the information fad. For knowledge of evil without action against it is acknowledgment of evil. Silence is consent. Inaction is the greatest of sins. The word sin (syn) means to be with anything. To be unopposed in our actions is to be in syn-thesis with it, to be in allowance and toleration of that evil thing. This is the state of the “union,” a common people standing with its government no matter what it does. A nation of syn (sin).

Along the way, as all this nonsense was rearing its ugly head for what it is, I began to study the words of this legalistic system of commerce, find words like redemption and being saved attributed to money, the god of nations in trust to mammon. I sought to find the True and Natural Law meaning of these words, knowing that no redemption or solution can ever be found through the emptiness of monetary inducements. And so I began in my first real effort to compile and decipher the words of King Jame’s purposefully misleading English (dog-Latin) translation of the Bible, witnessing how the legal language is a matrix code standing in substitution and artificial representation of the Bible code (Law). To this end, I compiled Cracking The Legal Code Of King James:

Hell – The name given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined. Rich. Diet. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition) (Balentines Law, 3rd Edition)

–=–

What is citizenship if not an open air prison for debtors? Same system, different name. Wrap the American flag around it and you have yourself a party in hell for patriotic debt-slaves!

Let us be clear… this alternative media disclosure of information is not an awakening, and this religious notion that “truths” and “patriots” are woken up is pure nonsense. To wake up from the American dream (nightmare) is to fall hard back into Nature, into what is Reality. Political and monetary “knowledge” is false, and is not an awakening, especially when one still participates in that which he has supposedly woken up from. Don’t kid yourselves. This information war and disclosure without consequence is merely an admission of organized crime, of the lies of liars, where the criminals continue unabated despite such disclosure. Information awareness causes informed consent at best, complacency and apathy at the worst. And the best place for criminals (devils/attorneys) to operate is out in the open, where their deeds are seen, known, and accepted in the light.

Thus our “choice” for president is between two criminals that have outed each other as the liars and criminal element they are, pretending all that information is null once the fictional campaign reaches the primary. There is no choice, for a True choice would include “NONE OF THE ABOVE,” not merely a pick of two or more evils. And if you do not vote, you still have made a choice. Disclosure of information is certainly not a cure for the disease, and in fact it promotes the disease by promoting the perceived helplessness of those who absorb the lies and crimes without taking action. This “infowar” is not for the purposes of lawful prevention but of mass-programming, a manipulation of the publicly perceived normalcy-bias of we, the public-minded commoners towards acceptance of that openly organized crime syndicate, which is merely business (commerce) as usual. Even the devil pretends to be as the light, and uses the legal system and law to flatteringly title himself as such. In legal land, satan is God. Lies are truth. Dark is light. Slavery is freedom (franchise). Perpetual war is peace. Fear is happiness. The God of Nature is dead.

And the patriotic course is of course to seek remedy and solution from the very source and protection racket of that syndicate, the court system, by finding some imaginary trust and investment scheme we can all tap into. Money is the savior, a compensation for being tossed into this debtors hell. Perhaps its time to raise the “bar” a bit and stop seeking justice from corruption and salvation from artifice in mammon?

A quick browsing of the Infowars website reveals nothing of the spirit, nothing of the True knowledge, merely more fruit of the conceptual tree of good and evil. And the “fans” eat it up, for a scholar and even a half-way decent researcher could not help but to find eventually such informational “truth” to be mostly false, opinionated fear mongering designed to sell products specifically tailored to novel fear sales campaigns. At the website we find threats of impending doom via yet unrealized events such as “World War III” along side advertisements for survival products and guns. We spread the fear of nuclear weapons and the Fukushima radiation hoax if you are not trying to sell the besets, top quality, high performance, ultra purified, super-duper, fuck yeah iodine supplements at the same time? Fear and sex certainly sell, and Mr. Jones certainly ain’t too sexy for his shirt, having a face special ordered for radio. His Zionist ex-wife insists on what a “good actor” he really is though.

And so fear is all he can peddle while promoting what he used to preach against, his “info-babes” and graphic backdrops. Most new Infowariers (fans) never saw or choose not to remember when Jones reported over a decade ago on the info-babes of Fox News and other mainstream outlets, with their bodacious ta-ta’s hanging out while they reported the so-called “news.” Now he’s promoting it. They don’t remember or choose not to remember when Jones reported on the graphics and satanic studio mnemonics that were flashed all over the mainstream screen and logos. Today, Jones uses similar mnemonics as his background graphics. He promotes christian values along side free-market capitalism, as if money (mammon) and commerce was ever a value put forward by christ. He reports on the enemy (our government) while waving its national flag of nativity, never teaching the difference between territory (land in Nature) and nationality (fictional hell). The Infowars site continuously promotes idiotic protests at the Republican Convention, not for any reason but that they are easy prey, easily picked apart, guaranteed to produce usable media footage of rebels without an actual cause or clue, and easily instigated by Jones to cause a small riot.

But then, one must ask exactly what is the purpose of this self-titled “infowar” if not disclosure without consequence, considering that nothing has ever been changed or corrected that is reported there, that no prisoners have been taken, nor any battles won because of that non-vetted, Youtube created, totally illegitimate and outside of the custody-chain of legally accepted evidence and at best third-party “information” that is never going to be acceptable in any legitimate court of law. But it’s all apparently good enough for the fools who support that info clearing house, for those who are caught up in their own info-prison-planet paradigm.

And so we search and find at these information sites only feul for the fire of informational consumerism and manufactured consent, creating an “informed” audience that actually believes they can prepare for modern warfare and zombies with the same outdated weapons, guns, and ammunition that their own government unlawfully traffics openly to all of its third world enemies in foreign countries without fear of those now primitive weapons compared to the fourth and fifth generation warfare tactics and weapons of today. Might as well be sticks and stones, but the infowar sponsors will sell them to you for much more than they are worth! To be informed by Infowars is like being an expert in video games, having knowledge only of the foundations of fiction and virtual reality while having no ability to survive the winter without government subsidies and on-grid benefits. But the games are played on government owned and militarily occupied fields and municipalities, and only with governments permission.

And so, naturally, we find more paradoxical behavior there in Jones’ paradigm support of a presidential candidate that represents one of the completely private associations (artificial persons) called the “Republican Party,” despite the fact that Jones claims himself to be “Libertarian.” (I suggest doing a search for “libertarianism and satanism” and see what pops up as to who created that political ideology!) But wait a minute! What happened to the left-right paradigm, Alex? When did Infowarriers become part of the right against left fiction? Turns out paradoxes can exist after all!

And yet nowhere do we find the Truth about these presidential elections, which is that the common people Jones preaches his disinformation to do not even elect the president. Voting is not, after all, electing. Two different words there. Having covered this subject and how the electoral college elects the president so many times here on this blog, we find this particular Truth avoided so that the dramatic story of the “rigged election” process may unfold and be repeatedly told to sell more products to support the infowar, just as it is in mainstream news outlets; inducements for readers and subscribers to purchase more worthless “health” and “survival” products to support the infowar paradigm. Why would the very man who coined the phrase “left-right paradigm” support the right against the left, when we know its all the same team? Because both of these candidates are his bloodline, Clinton and Trump standing united in blood but divided for public show. How many times do you need to hear Ales Emetic Jones speak about his bloodline relationship to the “People” who founded this nation before you realize that Jones is on their side, and that their side is opposed to yours?

It’s the same old story, as every president including the “white person” renamed “Obama” of the white (Jewish) Dunham clan of landholders are proven to be of the same line. And the opposing candidate is always a cousin. It’s always a choice between family members.

I spent a whole year researching and collecting genealogical records, becoming an addiction towards the end, and discovering a hidden class that can only be compared to the movie “They Live” running the entire political, corporate, and religious show:

As many readers have difficulty comprehending the bloodline issue, though EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD is inherited by the heirs of the blood, here is my earlier compilation of research, with many links, along with an over 4 hour radio presentation on the subject accounting for months and months of research into the subject.

And of course, when we truly see beyond the vail of that left-right paradigm that the Infowar has apparently and conveniently forgotten about, we see that the Republican Party is merely the Democrat party in disguise…

But the Real Truth is that we are battling only ourselves like pawns on a chessboard, for we are participating in and respecting nothing but fictional events (the history of fictional persons, places, and things) on the Roman calendar. We romanticize everything until its actuality is indistinguishable from its embellishments, and we call it the truth. We lend credibility to such artifices as elections, in turn giving them a false sense of legitimacy (truth) as we lust after our own franchised stake within it. Yet we never seem to notice that there is no box to check NO. Choose is yes or no, not Trump or Clinton. But the illusion of choice is certainly baked into our brains by the infowar, making this causality of a certainty of two evils appear as if “the people” in common have spoken. And the billions spent in media and advertising keep up appearances though the modern feudal system never changes. It cannot change, for it is built (constituted) into the very law we foolishly and ignorantly respect. And the bloodline always wins every election, even as these latest of two cousins by the same grandmother pretend to compete with each other while promising their feudal tenants change we can be made to believe in. Of course in technology circles (i.e. artificial information), the word “change” comes from the word “delta,” which in the Brave New World model are the working class of slaves to the Alphas and Betas, not quite bright enough to see their designs and content in their institutionalized feudalistic form of happy slavery. OF course, only a slave votes for a master, and only he who has turned away from God seeks any such artful master.

The infowar’s greatest design is to cause all men to suffer each other’s collective inaction. It puts us all into our own form of artificial political party, with leaders more corrupt than those it exposes for profit. The group mentality, above all else, is pushed therein. And so as long as it appears that the group, the subscribers, the membership is waking up due to such a randomized oil spill of informational nothingness by the “truth party” leaders, individual action is thwarted, even as personal power is cowed by that prison of mental programming.

As to the only True power any man has, I decided to examine and re-write my own individual declaration of independence, with a comparison of current events and power structures that so far surpass the original that its authors would be ashamed to call us their sons and daughters. As long as we collectively toss our personal power into a group setting and then allow that group mentality to decide for us how our personal power should be utilized, we might as well admit that we are individually powerless and that our will or God’s shalt never be done. But its easier this way, right? Easier to just go with the flow, to grow with the seeds of corruption planted for us as our own garden (prison)?

For that theft of personal will and power is the Real power of political parties. Apparently “infowarriors” are “republicans” this time around, and the True nature of that political party paradigm be damned as they collectively support this current, prestigious representative of the bloodline despite the cognitive dissonance they must be feeling.

The harshest and most outward Truth is that most people in this war of information do not seek the Truth, for the Truth would actually set them free into Nature, taking them out of their security of legal franchise in personhood (legally granted and enforced “freedom” under dominion of the landlords), and the illusions preferred by such an information matrix as a virtual reality is much easier to accept than facing the Truth without such insurance and security of the church and state. For the Truth is only what is Real, what is of Nature, what is self-evident and self-existent, and therefore it is only what is not a fictional creation and invention of mans imagination. In this way, what we call as the agreed upon legal “truth” of information can be blamed for our own actions and inactions, allowing us to ignore our responsibilities to thwart such evil (artifice) and lies. And we get the added bonus of this imaginary enemy, the invented cause of all of our problems, as we pretend that we have no choice but to follow our leaders. We scream for a “voluntary society,” ignoring in an almost institutional way that all of our actions are in fact voluntary, and that participation in legal, contractual citizenship is certainly, under the doctrine of volunteerism (master and servant), a voluntary state of artificial being.

—=—

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to agencies of government.”

—City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

—=—

As the song goes, “No one can take away your right to fight and to never surrender.” But ask any anarchist for their excuse for volunteering and following the legal law in personhood is because if they don’t they will be harmed somehow. Some even claim there is an imaginary gun to their head 24/7, that all services are provided by government with a gun forcing them to partake in it. But the Truth is that unless you are willing to die for what you believe in (love), unless you are willing to kill to protect your beliefs (loves), then you are just full of shit. Citizenship is a surrender of unalienability. It is a turning away from God and Natural Law. There is no excuse before the God of Nature or before a magistrate judge (legal god), for ignorance is no excuse to break any Law, including Nature’s. Pretending that we are not voluntarily participating in the adversarial evils of legalism doesn’t make it the Truth. You could fight, you could never surrender, but then your licenses and privileges (franchise freedom) might be taken away. It’s time to grow up and stop lying to ourselves that we are being forced. It’s a self-decieving lie built of fear and spiritual uncertainty and nothing more. No one can take away your right to fight and to never surrender. Fighting and surrendering are always voluntary acts. And no one is ever forced to be in public citizenship (voluntary servitude).

–=–

“So, we have all over today all kinds of cliques and clans and sects. We have anarchists and activists all fighting, really,over the same thing.All actually missing the point; missing the real point of the whole thing, being that, Truth makes peace; error makes law. If the individual understands the facts of his own faith correctly, he will discover the faiths of all others. But if he becomes merely a bigot of his own, and intolerant of all that he does not believe to be true, then when he attacks the other persons belief he is only attacking his own belief under a different name.”

—Manly P. Hall, from a recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”

–=–

And so instead of unvolunteering we instead demonize that which we in fact continuously volunteer to support. We vote for our masters even as we call them criminals, which can only really mean that we get what we deserve. And if we do not vote, if we do not make a choice, and at the same time still volunteer to be subjects of government in citizenship, we still have made a choice, the choice of the actual electors in a rigged election. We go through these motions even as they call themselves as the worst criminals in their political, primetime debates. We allow them to steal from us because it is voluntary and legal according to their own legislated codes, through taxation and other forms of exaction and extortion. For while contracting and acting in U.S. and other national, commercial citizen-ships (vessels) is easily proved to be a voluntary commercial franchise (legal freedom), the law applied to said citizen-ship is not voluntary. For as the maxim (foundational principle) of law states, to know the law and to be bound under the law are the same thing in consideration of the agents (judges) and creators (magistrate gods) of law.

For instance, since the principles of law also state that ignorance of law is never an excuse, ignorance of this completely feudal part of the U.S. Code is no excuse for any man participating voluntarily. You better learn real quick that these are your rights when voluntarily acting in the person of the nation (district)!!!

–=–

42 U.S. Code § 1981 – Equal rights under the law

(a) Statement of equal rights

“All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.“

–=–

EXACTION:

“Torts. A willful wrong done by an officer, or by one who, under color of his office, takes more fee or pay for his services than what the law allows. Between extortion and exaction there is this difference; that in the former case (extortion) the officer extorts more than his due, when something is due to him; in the latter (exaction), he exacts what IS NOT HIS DUE, when there is nothing due to him.“

–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, commissioned as an official dictionary of congress

–=–

Exaction (the worst kind of extortion) is your legal right, like it or not. It is an executively enforced right of personhood. And every citizenship shares that right equally. It is a requirement of every public citizenship. And though we complain fervently about such extortion as taxation and “fees” and “penalties” as exaction, we never seem to acknowledge the fact that the U.S. Code states clearly that it is our enforced and involuntary “RIGHT” to be exacted, taxed, put in pain, punished, exacted, etc. And we pretend that we have free speech as we complain, even when we are writing out our checks to the IRS and other agencies of government, fulfilling our right to be exacted from and giving agencies and their agents what is not their due, just as the kings and publicans (tax-collectors) of old. Rights are voluntarily accepted as mandatory in exchange for allegiance and submission to all other laws and the benefits and protections they afford. This is well established as a maxim and foundation of law. A right granted by any person, place, or thing (legal noun/name/title) is not a self-existent, self-evident God-given Right. It is not unalienable, but rather requires the lien of surety bondage of citizenship. It is contractual. And contracts are always voluntary, though their terms are restrictive and enforceable. The devil can only defeat a man of God with words, and citizenship is nothing more than a legally binding contract – a performance debt.

The Truth of Nature is now being customarily augmented just as much by Poki-mon monsters as it is with the lies of attorneys, politicians, and priests. And all media outlets are there to keep us interested, attached, and plugged-in to the information game. To pretend to be on the alternative or pretended truthful side of information is no different that being in on a lie. To pretend that alternative news is anything but information about confirmed and ratified lies called as legal truths is the first circle of hell. And to argue over what is good and sound money practices is the foundation of hell, a worshiping and respect of mammon and its artificial matrix of monetary valuation. For money can only be justified if slavery is justified, if everything in Nature is assigned a legal name or title, and the name is valued in mammon, taking away the True Freedom of all Life and Source, turing God’s Creation into a re-source of man. Only then is a valuation placed upon the priceless Nature of self-existence. And this is the harshest Truth of all. For one cannot Truly take sides in a “war” over information, for all information is merely coded and organized words, never actual Source. A war of words (information) will lead to nowhere, yet has the potentiality to cause men to destroy all Life so as to fulfill that war. Only then can the infowar be won, for there would be no beings left to distill and distribute such artificial things and words. The info would die with its source, mirroring the death and finally decayed madness of unspiritual men. Fiction may only destroy man if man allows fiction to rule his mind. Man may only destroy his own Nature if he continues to fall pray to this war of artificial information.

Perhaps the most painful Truth to finally comprehend is also the most obvious and ironic one. For there is a very good reason that the infowar stays only in the info (legal fiction) realm and never in the realm of action, a reason that is self-evident when the question of what is government finally becomes clear and is able to be considered by men bound to the Natural Law without vain patriotic accouterments in support of fictions and legalistic laws and licensure. The infowar stays out of the courts, out of the legal system, because a judges’ (legally entitled artificial person’s) first duty is to protect its principal employer, the very government it represents and holds its authority in flattering title from. In other words, no judge will rule against government or its members and sovereign magistrates or “People” because no judge can put the United States in harm’s way.

The judge protects the government from us, not us from government. No decision that would, for instance, cause rioting in the streets will ever be opinionated in any majority or precedent-setting ruling, unless that is the desired goal in order to cause more heavy-handed executive agencies and legislation. Organized crime will never rule against its own syndication, against the very incorporation that gives it its own false authority. If the nation wishes to have civil war, it will have it. All it needs to promulgate is the proper false information to its unwitting citizen-ships, the vessels of commerce that do not recognize their own voluntary enslavement and servitude.

And so obviously the events of 9/11 will not be pinned on government as an “inside job” by the very magistrate judges that corporation nation employs! Duh! How many countless hours do so many “truthers” expend delving into the actual events of September 11th, 2001, as if nothing else happened on that day? How much energy is put forward in exposing the information of that “event” without ever actually doing anything about it? How many criminal connections have been made to the very politicians in office at that time, and how many of them have been executed for treason or been placed in jail or banished? The infowar ensures that only information disclosure but never action takes place, as if we are sitting in an imaginary coliseum cheering for the sign from Caesar to punish or kill the gladiators. But Caesar is the District, and it will never give itself the accusatory thumb. It judges itself, for its judges are gods, and gods can only exist through nations.

I guarantee you that the end of this road towards the discovery or just what is Truth does not end with any .com,.info, or .org title, and especially not with a .gov disposition. When one finally sees only the Truth and knows it instinctually and as totally distinguishable from artifice, it is always recognizable and cannot be mis-taken for anything but It’s own Nature of self-evidence and self-existence. For it is Pure in its Nature. It is all aspects of True Existence; a Oneness that Exists despite man’s names, titles, numerals, or symbols used to fictionally define It. And it is only when the Real outweighs and crushes any artificial valuation and name (noun) placed upon it by man that one finally sees the Truth.

The only question that remains is how do we Live only in Truth, in only our spiritual Nature, without the pretended power of that artifice of informational nonsense?

As for myself, I remember fervently debating over the concept of “sound money” for many years. The word sound carries the meaning of stability, which money by design has and can have none of, except in its ultimately temporary life and valuation, which is always in Truth an absolute nothingness. Its value is only as sound as the sand running out of the hourglass, for like the hourglass, money is merely a design of man’s imagination. Money is nothing more than a belief system, a religious faith in it as a god (creator), not a self-evident Truth. It is a creation of man, not of God’s Nature and Source, and so it can never exist in self-evident Reality. What is money today may be fuel for a depressive or inflation fire tomorrow. Money of yesterday is used for wallpaper today, if it is not worshiped vainly as somehow more artificially valuable than its face once re-presented. Tomorrows money will be touted as the cure for todays monetary dis-ease, though like any pharmaceutical remedy it will only replace one dis-ease with another set of symptoms. And these new symptoms will be compounded as the new name of the same old dis-ease in that perpetually mind-numbing monopoly game of mammon. Money, you see, is also merely empty and falsified information. And that’s why, like the priests of all denominations of disinformation-spewing, legally incorporated churches, the Infowar corporation seeks money in everything it does. It’s an information exchange network. It sells lies told as truths in exchange for the biggest and most brilliant lie of all, that of monetary wealth.

What is sound is what everything should be built upon. A foundation. When a society’s foundation is built upon money, upon commerce, then it is built upon nothing of substance. It will crumble. It has to. For its foundation is temporary, as all things called as money are. Its reality will be informationally and technologically (artfully) augmented so that it appears more virtually appealing to its volunteerest, as modernized feudal subjects, appearing falsely to be more close to the Truth of the Reality of Nature than it ever can be. And like children in want of our slightly out-of-reach and dirty pacifier, we will feed on its murky artifice. We will take the artificial teat of government as our mother, a fictional, protective, artificial womb (matrix) that is as paper thin as the money it projects to insure us. When the root of all evil is our insurance policy, our foundation, our security, then our existence can only be as the minions of a debtor’s hell.

With all of that said, the reader of this will likely call me a hypocrite in my seeking the charitable contributions of those who are reading this. I accept that. I cannot deny that I am in such a terribly unavoidable disposition that my work cannot be printed in any Real aspect so as to protect it from being just digital, erasable information. I cannot deny that I am asking for money while exclaiming the less than virtuous nature of its artifice. I am fully aware of this dichotomy, and it pains me to no end.

However, I seek no gain from this request. I seek no fame or fortune. I don’t even seek money, except to pass it from your individual hands to the book-printers hands. This money is not for me, it is for the preservation of knowledge attained by one of you, one who actually did wake up from the information war and was able to explain it for future generations so that they do not fall for such fictional, satanic designs ever again, never falling pray to the fake infowar as our own egos have. I simply wish to print my books privately without publishing them, so that they can never be claimed as government property, and thus subsequently shelved or burned at 451 fahrenheit.

To this end, I have offered the first volume of this work for free, as I have done and will do with all of my work both past and in the future. Volume II is nearing completion, and will blow this first foundational work out of the water.

In celebration of my own journey, a path and learning curve that many reading this are also on or in the middle of, I offer the following video testimony of my own path in hopes that it will help you on yours.

Here I offer a walkthrough of my activist efforts that were caught on camera or microphone. These are fond memories of pointless rhetoric done to support the information war. They are personal reminders of how enslaved we really are, pretending to have free speech while being mildly tolerated by those that grant it only to themselves. Recognizing myself not as the hero but as the slave in these seemingly victorious encounters is that change of perspective that needs to happen with each of us.

—=—

“The American people don’t believe anything until they see it on television.”

–Richard M. Nixon, U.S. president

—=—

To start with, here is one of my latest interviews on Leak Project. I don’t often like to use video, but here is the tip of the iceberg of my latest work. And hey, it all must be true because its on truth TV, right?

—=—

When I first moved to the Salt Lake City area about seven years ago, after being an active member of We Are Change Los Angeles and thus leading me to a life of full-time research and activism, we formed and grew the Utah chapter of We Are Change, soon after holding a conference with Luke Rudkowski and many great (and as it turns out not so great) speakers. Live and learn…

—=—

One of those speakers, though all other footage and recordings were lost, was Professor Steven Jones:

–=–

And a photo opportunity at the end…

—=—

With support, this would have been a great event. And I would love to do this again after pulling this one off logistically without flaw. But with no support, it is now only a lost memory. Again, to imagine what I could do if not constrained by money… that is perhaps the worse feeling in the world.

Note: As embarrassing as it is to ask, if anyone has any footage from this conference please link it below in the comments or send me an email. This was the first of two different conferences with We Are Change Utah where the footage was magically “disappeared.” Thanks.

As a newby in the radio circuit, and because of the nature of the strange “beehive” culture in Utah, I could not then get the support by local radio or groups, and so the attendance was very low. I paid for this conference out of my own pocket, a debt that I though would be worth it because we had recorded the event. Unfortunately, the person that volunteered to come up from Texas to recored it worked as a host for GCN, and he either purposefully or accidentally lost all the footage. He did this after we had requested Alex Jones to support and host the conference, to which he refused. And so for my debt, for my efforts, I have jack shit to show for it accept the gratefulness of those few who attended. I am, to say the least, suspicious of what happened. And to make things worse, one of my trusted WAC members stole the little money we did bring in. But on a brighter note, this got me noticed by the local radio.

As the Tea Party movement was strong then (2010), and as Sheriff Mack was one of my speakers, the BBC came to interview myself and Mack for a documentary they were creating on the Tea Party movement. While Mack ended up making a fool of himself as he fell pray to the clever interviewer, thus making it into the final documentary as what can only be called as a portrayed imbecile and fool of the “patriot movement,” they didn’t quite know what to do with me and my answers. They couldn’t pin me to any side or party. I was an anomaly.

—=—

Needless to say, this interview didn’t make into the final cut of their twisted documentary, and BBC in no way supported our conference despite our giving it free reign to interview and film our guest speakers and make idiots of them. My conference and myself was not included or promoted. And so the BBC just used me to get an interview with some of my guests, pretending to support my efforts. Such douchebaggery.

After the conference, we arranged to have a good ol’ fashioned street action and bannering of the freeway with our 9/11 big blue banners, where we were visited by some local police that acted admirably in our support.

—=—

Around that time we had also delivered the official dossier of evidence of 9/11 to the Attorney General of Utah Mark Shurtlif, who gleefully has been behind bars until recently as a criminal for corruption charges, along with his counterpart, former Attorney General Mark Swallow. Of course the Bar Association controls all attorneys and judges, so why would we possibly hope such protected crime would break the syndicalist stranglehold?

This was perhaps my favorite filmed confrontation, the best of in-your-face-when-you-least-expect-it guerrilla journalism, where I simply asked what the Attorney General had done with that officially received evidence, and he talked his arrogant self right into a corner. What transpired was priceless… but yet again pointless. Gotta love this one though!

—=—

For the benefit of the less than happy Attorney General (head devilmaster), I will provide the U.S. Code here that deals with devils that do not turn evidence over to a judge…

–=–

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not,as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State,is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Guilty or not guilty? It ain’t your choice. It’s the private brotherhood of the Bar Association’s choice, and this man is its general!!!

Deal with it, subject!

To be fair, we did also arrange a legitimate sit-down interview where the Attorney could pretend to be lawful and legitimate and on the common people’s side, being the responsible activists we were:

—=—

But as for the “Tea Party Express,” a well-funded corporate sham, we attempted to participate and stand in unity with our supposedly celebrated “free speech” rights, while the fake Tea Party Express media heads shunned us and blocked our banners. You gotta see this to believe it. Exposing hypocrites was vastly becoming our community service and past time.

Of note here again, we see our sheriff’s officers acting with integrity and according to duty. Bravo!

—=—

The best part as always is the media spin at the end. Never was anything we did or protested reported on accurately or in context by the mainstream news outlets.

We Are Change made national news a few times here in Utah, but this one was certainly the best, most embarrassing, and most viewed. Unfortunately, the video of my own confrontation with congressman Chafetz on the CAFR issue is lost to the ether.

—=—

—=—

Of course, Chafetz had to rescind his comments made to us crazy conspiracy people once our little home video got loosed upon the national news.

—=—

Whenever we got the chance, we would hand out pamphlets and DVD’s or hold up our banners to cause irrational cognitive dissonance among the residents of this “beehive” state. Like the postman, activism happens rain or shine!

—=—

Sometimes, though rarely, it was not us doing the confronting but in fact our query calling out our own shortcomings. Here Lord Monckton agreed to sit with us after his presentation at, where else, Utah University, shedding a light on the reasons why We Are Change and other outlets of so-called “truth” were failing miserably in actually getting anything done about it in court (in government). His perspective changed my whole outlook. As a former investigative agent himself in Britain, he corrected me and changed my own course, turning my own perceptions to where the problem actually lies… the false teachings and doomed efforts of the Infowar! Here he schools me to my own embarrassment on such legal notions of the chain of custody and chain of evidence, none of which the “truth” movement ever follows, leaving our so-called “evidence” worthless and unusable, let alone undocumented and untraceable. This was my first perception into the false dichotomy of shock jocks like Alex Jones, who does triple the harm as he ever does good, causing masses of activists to act unprofessionally and not according to the law, and so that nothing we do counts as truly usable evidence.

The following is in four parts, and features me still in my own cone of ignorance trying to make a difference. I value these moments to show how much I have grown both spiritually and in reasonability. It is a reminder of how we all live under false impressions, impressions that are institutionally ingrained by both educative and entertainment-based fallacy.

—=—

—=—

—=—

—=—

Other activist outings revealed more hard-to-stomach Realities that manifested in unlikely places. While outreaching in the airport as part of a national protest to the then new irradiated full body-scanners, we found out the hard way that free speech is a lie, is “not absolute,” and that we needed legal permits to have even limited free speech. But most of all, this was my first realization, on camera, that these guys were powerless to stop my speech unless I had one of their permits for speech. In other words, no contract, no unreasonable legal code. Permission and license is the opposite of Natural freedom, as is legal person-hood.

But what I got this head of police to say was priceless…

—=—

—=—

A short time after that, I was handcuffed for no reason at the same airport by an over zealous police officer for attempting to say no to both the full body scanner and the body search. What transpired was a hell of a story, which I documented here:

For most of this time I had been mentoring with Walter Burien, who was teaching me about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting system (CAFR) of all governments. Because I had quit my career as a sound engineer and designer to be an activist, I had the skills to help Walter make a documentary, and did so without pay. This was my first venture into documentary making, and my first time working charitably without expectation. And it felt wonderful!

Here is both the shorter trailer and the full movie:

—=—

—=—

From this effort, and from being able to spend so much time with Walter, I became a quick study and began my own film about everything I had learned and kept self-teaching. From this came “The Corporation Nation” series of documentaries, homemade in every way by yours truly. As I look back on this project, and as is shown in the first ten minutes of the movie, I really ended up making this because when I confronted the former Comptroller General of the United States about governments massive investment portfolio, as well as the incredible land and property holdings of the United States government collectively, he outright lied to my face over and over, even claiming that government was not a corporation! This pissed me off so much that it spawned whole The Corporation Nation series, all because of liars and the lies they tell.

—=—

In part two of The Corporation Nation I covered the pension system and its true purpose, showing government to hold mega-shares in just about all corporations around the world, the epitome of globalism having formed right under our noses. It took a four hour film to document this, with countless pictures used from the CAFR reports, showing officially that government not only owns shares in all corporations, but also votes as proxy shareholder voter for their boards of directors, for mergers and acquisitions, and other “corporate governance” issues. Talk about global empire and fascism!

—=—

When Jan Irvin started interviewing me as more and more radio shows wanted to hear what I had to say, I made this separate film to aid Jan in exposing his own school district, and in hopes that others might follow by utilizing the same information in their own local CAFRs. Besides these movies, I wrote dozens of blog articles detailing the CAFR swindle.

—=—

For those seeking an advanced lesson in the CAFR audit system, and to see how municipal cities, counties, and states are faking their bankruptcies, I wrote my first “book” on my blog, which I intend at some point to add to and print as well. That can be found here:

As I became more advanced in my own knowledge and comprehension of the sheer nightmarish corruption displayed in these publicly available but unknown and publicly unread CAFR reports, my local activism revealed the Sheriff of Salt Lake County (and most other county sheriffs around the nation) to be at the pinnacle of this infiltration of Agenda 21 and globalist, United Nations switchover.

Here I expose “The Sheriff Who Sold His County” by revealing the non-governmental associations and special districts that are set up to exact and extort more and more money, in our case from what was officially called a “police protection fee” charged ultimately, indirectly to the property tax, where if that fee was not then paid, the county could steal people homes and property to pay the “fee” that they swear is not actually a “tax.” Like a complicated puzzle with thousands of indistinguishable pieces, I spent months and finally figured out this scam, somehow piecing it together. Here I attempt to teach the locals what the hell just happened!

—=—

I had several encounters with this corrupt county sheriff, the prodigal son of a Utah bloodline with seven generations of politicians that have no qualifications but their family name, a local dairy farm family that has put more than one independent farmer out of business by its political hold over this county.

Also during this time I was appearing occasionally on our local AM radio station (K-TALK 630AM), going against the grain and causing a stir in the hive mind. The sheriff that sold his county was good enough to grace us with an interview, where his true colors shown through. I wished at the time that I had actually figured out the whole scam by then, but I had not. Unwittingly though, this public spectacle by the sheriff helped me immensely to finally understand the whole scheme. He’s a slimy bastard.

Other confrontations were unfortunately not filmed, including one with the chief financial officer (CFO) of the county (note that CFO is only ever a corporate title).

Intermittent videos were made, short attempts to bring perspective to folks who knew all was wrong but couldn’t see it clearly…

—=—

After seeing the movie “Inside Job” narrated by bloodline family member Matt Damon, who actually pretending to give a shit, I did my best to call him out to so as to publicly announce the actual truth about what happened in 2008-9 with the so-called economic crash. Naturally, he did nothing. Here I show from my films how government owned all the banks that profited, merged, and crashed through stock investment, and we see the same thing with oil companies and water companies. It is this disconnect by the public that knows not government’s stake-holding in these corporations that must be corrected, so that the complete conflict of interest of the regulators owning the companies they regulate can be comprehended. And you wonder why the shareholder (government) of oil companies doesn’t force them to clean up their spills? That would be bad for governments investment profits of course, and a corporations highest concern by law is to please and profit its shareholders!

—=—

—=—

After years of research and comprehension, I have accumulated many articles on this blog about the CAFR reporting system. A large collection of most of those “CAFR School” blogs are linked here, along with a few radio shows about it:

It cannot be stated here with any qualification how important this system of accounting for government corporations is. It is the holy grail of open secrets. It is a game-changer. It explains in full the corruption within government and the corporate world, two realms that are literally tied at the hip, and allows us to understand lobbying for what it really is. I have spent years trying to help others comprehend its structure, which is of course not meant to be understood by the public at all. Of all the links I have provided herein, this one is perhaps the most recommended, for it is a journey into all of my research on the subject of this hidden in plain sight government accounting scheme. And its rules and best practices are currently being implemented on a global scale within all nations.

What the common citizen-ship agent does not realize is that he lives in a company store. Just as companies like the East and West India and Virginia Companies funded by the king were the true founders of the so-called colonies (plantations) of early America, we subsist today in a singular commercial company called the Untied States district and commercial jurisdiction amongst the other company stores of the United Nations. Most of us work for some publicly traded and thus government owned corporation, manufacturing or otherwise producing its commercial products, and are paid in company script (U.S. currency) that allows no competition. We then spend that currency in any one of those government-held stock corporations, from grocery stores to gas stations, and in turn pay tribute (taxation) to the main company (district) and all its several franchise subsidiaries (legal state governments and agencies). This collaboration has become so obvious at this point that banks now simply collect property tax with our mortgage (dead pledge) payments. We live, work, and play in and on the persons, places, and things (patented nouns) of government. All of our property is its property, all the territory its land. We are the employees and tenants of a feudalistic company store, renamed as a commercial nation with “liberty” for all (in an open air debtor’s prison) designed to protect the pirates and private landholders (lords) that run it.

But, as we are not educated to recognize our place and status therein, it takes someone voluntarily removed from it like me over a decade to finally see this legal matrix code for what it is. And of course, this necessarily means that I am disenfranchised from every aspect of it I can be, for to see it one must have no interest in it. One can only see one’s false, legal id-entity when one destroys his ego and stops attempting to justify his legal, artificial character and existence. And perhaps the saddest part of all this is that I would not expect those receiving a pension from this monstrous company store, whose investments are in all the corporations and associations we complain about and which are the key to government holding stock and shareholder votes in those corporations, to give up their perceived “benefits” by being wed to such a devilish partner.

Samuel Johnson, in his rather curt and unabashedly honest dictionary of 1755, defined a pension as:

PENSION – An allowance made to any one without an equivalent. In England, it is generally understood to mean pay given to a state hireling for treason to his country. (Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1755)

–=–

But what truly is this allowance given to a group of the agents (employees and citizenships) of government that would betray their very own best interest and that of God’s Nature itself? What does government accomplish by this actuarial retirement scheme? What crimes does it get away with merely because it allows profit-sharing to its employees for foolishly allowing government to invest in the worst possible corporations throughout the world?

ALLOW – verb transitive – [Latin loco, to lay, set, place. See Lay.] 1. To grant, give or yield; as, to allow a servant his liberty; to allow a pension. 2. To admit; as, to allow the truth of a proposition; to allow a claim. 3. To admit; to own or acknowledge; as, to allow the right of the President to displace officers. 4. To approve, justify or sanction.Ye allow the deeds of your fathers. Luke 11:48. Romans 8:1. 5. To afford, or grant as a compensation; as, to allow a dollar a day for wages. 6. To abate or deduct; as, to allow a sum for tare or leakage. 7. To permit; to grant license to; as, to allow a son to be absent. (Webs1828)

–=–

The middle and above middle class public pensioner is always the loudest to cry foul at government handouts to the poorest and most destitute of people, claiming this action of actual charity to be equal to the robbing of the taxpayer money coffers. Imagine discovering that this is pure hypocrisy, and that most of them don’t even know it themselves! For it is actually the pensioner that lives in robbery of the taxpayer coffers, in a self-deluded ignorance, as I have shown through primary evidence. Turns out that infinitely more amounts of taxpayer money go to “match” government employee “contributions” or outright pay in total for these public pension funds. It is a massive suck of taxpayer money, so much that it is hardly believable, and thus pensioners are certainly in denial of their disposition. In fact, the whole point of hiring so many redundant government employees is to specifically extract taxpayer money for each hireling by placing them into governments pension fund system. The more employees, the more exaction can be taken from taxpayer funds in all local, municipal governments. It’s just part of the global corporate investment scheme.

I explain this fully below and showed it in my documentary, The Great Pension Fund Hoax, so that no doubt can possibly remain, only cognitive dissonance. Remember, I only seek the Truth, no matter how much it hurts. And the pensioner will defend his or her “stake” in this evil cabal of the company store to the bitter end, an unwitting trainer to the rest of us. But Truth is never defeated by purposeful ignorance. Pension funds are, more than any other source, responsible for the globalism we see today. And Samuel Johnson’s definition above certainly holds true today.

We are a society that has no natural predators to fear, and so we have taken to devouring ourselves and our vital habitat to further our exponentially pointless gains in order to keep this investment and corporate governance scheme and class structure of inequality going into perpetual madness… and likely into oblivion.

Here’s a perfect example, the Sand Wars. And something everyone should see:

A look at the CAFR for any government pension fund reveals the corporate power structure that pensioners make allowance for in order to gain from that ultimate nothingness of stocks valuations and other financially void instruments of corruption. This post shows by industry just one pension fund’s investment portfolio in the industries that are otherwise continuously demonized by their bad behavior and toxic events.

Doesn’t it piss you off to know that your retirement and taxpayer money is being invested in George Bush’s Carlyle Group to the tune of multiple billions in just one government pension fund scheme?!?

Sadly, Walter Burien of CAFR1.com and I are estranged at this point, and to this fact I wish to speak here without intent of slander or attack. As I progressed in my own self-teaching, reading CAFR after CAFR after corporate AFR (annual financial report) mixed with legal code and the history of this investment system set up so long ago, my questions started becoming more of a nuisance to Walter than mere simple and actually answerable inquiries. As I contemplated more and more the reason and design behind his strategy and “Tax Retirement Fund” system, I could never find the part where his “plan” would actually fix anything or cause corporate governance of corporations to change for the benefit of us common folks as he continuously proclaimed. For once, Walter didn’t have any answers, and so my questions became mistakenly taken as personal attacks upon his “plan,” and his responses steeped more and more in resentment, as if I was attacking his intentions and not trying to help get that system going. And yet one theme of our conversations never did change, which was the self-enrichment of Walter after so much suffering as head of his own business plan. Eventually, I could not merely overlook this obvious conflict of interest, especially when Walter was no longer able to answer my questions about his designs.

I campaigned tirelessly for years on behalf of Walter, attempting to get people out there to fund his efforts, but never my own. I never asked for funding, convincing myself that it would somehow come if I kept doing the right thing; that someone would step up and back up my efforts.

Pipe dreams… or so I thought.

Suddenly and out of nowhere, Walter messaged me that he had just received a $600,000 donation (and a future pledge totaling $1 million) from exactly the kind of undeservingly wealthy trust fund baby that I figured would one day somehow wake up and consciously realize he needs to support someone like myself and Walter. But I had not campaigned anything for myself, only for Walter, trusting in his integrity. I had faith in the man, something the Bible says never to put upon any man. And now I understand those words of wisdom intimately, after so many years of broken faith in so many people.

In fact, both Walter and especially myself saw through one of those false heroes of the truth movement, Dr. Ron Paul (a signer of birth certificates). I remember when I first started calling bullshit on the whole “End The Fed” movement and the Federal Reserve mythology how I was chastised and fallaciously attacked from all sides. For to take away anyones perceived enemy causes them to start looking inwardly for the Real problems, and that would mean facing the actual, self-evident Truth. And so as soon as I understood that the CAFR of the Federal Reserve was indeed the supposedly non-existent audit of the Fed, I felt obligated in honor to share that information with my fellow “truthers.” It was this effort more than anything, including the depredation of Ron Pauls false character and hero-status, that showed me the truth about the truth movement.

After posting the first of these only primarily sourced expose’s on Ron Paul and the Federal Reserve, all I received was personal attacks. My favorite of these was on Ron Paul’s website, where the top members and managers of that (Daily Paul) site debated not on the facts presented in my blog article, but on whether or not I had enough clout and a big enough audience to cause any stink. Screw the facts, was I a threat? I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. They were only interested in keeping up appearances and holding on to the Ron Paul money-mobile and charade. And for a while it indeed was a commercial cash cow for Paul and his supporters, complete with books, T-shirts, and other worthless swag.

And big surprise! Nothing came of it.

But why did nothing come of it?

Because it was all based on foundational lies!!! And yet I was the enemy for telling the truth about the false truths about the actual Fed. I continued to find myself in this position over the years, constantly fact-checking and calling out the lies and liars that were pushing them, either willfully or unwittingly as followers putting their faith in men, but never in the actual, provable facts. Patriots for profit, we call them.

Here are my research articles explaining the true nature of Ron Paul and the Fed, and how fans and followers of these false teachers are stuck in their own paradigm.

While Ron Paul had the perfect opportunity to expose the CAFR system as the already existing and only audit of the Fed, he chose his career as a congressman instead. We challenged and challenged him to expose the CAFR to his “fans” but to no avail, proving him (and many of his supporters) to be utter fraudsters.

As far as mine and Walter Burien’s relationship is concerned, and without gory or personal detail, but as well knowing that money equals power and that power always and absolutely corrupts and leads to greed and why I try my hardest to avoid it like the plague, our story and history together ended abruptly. Walter decided that he would not use that money to fulfill all his plans that I had worked so hard to learn and promote, but to purchase land and build a large business complex upon it’s potential success in Pueblo, New Mexico. In other words, he was going to give that entire financial donation to himself in the form of equity, just like the corrupt government does in its own financial trickery. I can only assume that greed took over, as it so often does. And because I never asked for anything from Walter as payment for working on his documentary or for supporting him out of my own pocket, nothing is exactly what I got from him. I campaigned and begged without dignity for someone to support this guy, and than here was the end of it, the fruit of our efforts, and then the greedy squashing of that finally realized pipe dream. With nothing left to do business or travel with, nothing ever became of all that money to my knowledge, and it was certainly never used for the purposes I believed it would be utilized for.

Just another heartbreak in a series of heartbreaks…

That was the last I spoke to him. I stopped supporting him. I stopped asking the tough questions. And the last post I saw from him was of course Walter asking for more donations some time last year.

Again, I do not wish to belittle Walters efforts at educating or most of his works and for helping to guide my own learning curve, most of which was really from my own efforts and research. I only want to show that like so many others that have crossed my path, money is always that which destroys them or steals their good intentions. Money is always what influences one, instead of helping, to harm others. Money is always what destroys relationships and induces divorce lawyers to cause women to become greedy monsters to the men they made vows to love and cherish. It always leads to evil, to adversarial purposes. It is why I ceased my show with “Freeman Burt” every week even as he continues to harm his clients by “helping” them, and as opposing proof is inversely why Daniel stayed with me to the end of my radio show in loyalty and brotherly love and intent every week. Money corrupts all things. Only Daniel and I seemed to remained free of it, which is a testimony all by itself.

To be clear, I am asking for donations the only morally viable way I know how to do so, without that corruptive element. Nothing displeases me more than being in this disposition, for I have learned to live without such legally purchased material pleasures made in foreign child-labor sweat shops and by U.S. prison labor hidden behind adorning celebrity faces pretending to give a shit about anything but their paycheck. I seek donations only to give it to another in exchange for printing my book. I am not selling anything, and never will, for commerce is that which is diametrically opposed to Love and Charity. I merely need the only object of exchange accepted by these brainwashed business people that have the equipment to print books in a private transaction, without barcodes and artful tracking marks, signs, and symbols. I haven’t any other choice that I am aware of. I will always give this work away for free to all who ask. And those who can will or will not support me here by donating what they can. What else can I possibly do? I don’t ask for your faith in me, only in my work and the verifiable and ancient knowledge presented within. All donations will go to that purpose alone.

As for my own journey, time progressed and I kept researching and learning…

As a cancer survivor at the age of 17, I spent a large part of my life seeking the causes of cancer and understanding why only in time do we have so many childhood illnesses that are considered as “early onset” adult diseases. What I found ultimately lead me to the only plausible prime suspect: vaccines. This was my first documentary on the history of vaccines, posted in September 2011, and which in hindsight is almost sophomoric compared to what I’ve learned since then. But that is the way of everyones unique path and the journey we choose to take. We must arrive in steps, and these are my larger steps in video, documentary form:

—=—

—=—

Early on in We Are Change we had been planning this documentary project, which I took over as the group started to become corrupt and tear apart, as so many of them do. Here is some early footage of vaccine victims we interviewed, which was not used.

—=—

I was also asked to speak to some folks in New York City about vaccines and the documentary, which was a nice visit to my former place of residence.

—=—

As time progressed,perhaps my greatest assembly of puzzle pieces was the Agenda 21 and Common Core plans and how they play out in globalism. Here is my lecture on the subject:

—=—

Somewhere along the way I documented my favorite charity, the only one I know that uses 100% of donations for charity! I have worked at this center every year for 4 years here in Utah when my mom and her church visits specifically to volunteer there. It is a charity worth supporting that does wonderful work.

—=—

My more recent public speaking engagement was in Philadelphia, where I was like a fish out of water, and it in fact caused me to expose most of the conference speakers as frauds. This didn’t go over very well, as Truth is not often what people want to hear. Imagine, freeing your mind at the Hilton! LOL!!

—=—

I have received gifts from people along the way, from books to home-made shoes, and these are of course the most precious of all to me. One unexpected gift was this one, where a reader placed my article into video format and dubbed his own voiceover to it. I regret that I made a mistake in this article, though it was one that does not actually have anything to do with the meat of its substance. I simply made an assumption that Sanger Institute was of the ilk of Margaret Sanger, and so I wrote her in mistakenly. But this should not take away from the actual information put forward, and I am so thankful for these types of efforts by good people. These types of mistakes teach us all how easily we can make false assumptions, and as researchers must verify all things.

This is “Archons And Mind Parasites And Extremophiles, Oh My!” and I know it took this guy a lot of time to put this together. So thank you so much for your efforts! What a voice!

—=—

—=—

Along the way, I even pretended to run for president, just to show that the common goyim people as subjects of the nation cannot be president of the nation, and to eventually expose the voting system as the fraud it is.

Though the website is history, the archive still exists. This is a very viable model that should be used. Though I don’t support Trump or his bloodline cousin Hillary, I will say that if Trump was smart he would follow this model and pick his entire staff before the election, so that people can see his “round table” of Cabinet heads and not just his silly hairdo. This is designed though as a “third party” platform. It is interesting to go back and read my individual platforms and compare them to what I know now. It is certainly healthy to view ones own ignorance recorded in the past to kill the ego of the present that will certainly reveal its own ignorance in the future…

Finally, though the years of radio before this are not included, here are my radio archives from Republic Broadcasting and everything in between and after, which will continue to be updated with any new shows I do. An extra special thanks to my friend Drew for keeping these archives on my behalf. Again, some gifts just can’t be monetized.

5 days a week for two years I labored without pay to bring these shows to life while at the same time researching and writing my current book series. It was a hell of a ride, full of trolls and saints, with some really good interviews and a documented timeline of my own journey, much of which led to my books.

I did so many shows before this, but they are not organized in any way, floating instead randomly out in the digital wasteland of youtube videos and mp3’s.

Perhaps each of these shows, most of them two hours, are worth a penny each? That’s $5 of thanks that could be gifted towards the printing of my book. But then a Mocha Frappacino with artificial flavoring from the local Starbuck’s drive-through might be worth that $5 so as to cause a chemical reaction in your brain, so that you might forget those hundreds of hours of research and rhetoric and walk around in a frap-induced stupor. I understand… We all have our priorities.

My work has been shared and plagiarized by many outlets, including the Prison Planet/Infowars sites and others. Some offer credit, and some do not. Some use a link only without actually naming my site or name. It’s an interesting matrix we have built.

Some of my movies, with my permission and blessing, are also available not-for-profit at the dollar DVD project (http://onedollardvdproject.com) to which I see no income from, but again with my blessing and support. These include Lethal Injection, The Corporation Nation, and The Great Pension Fund Hoax.

And so here I am, at the end of this winding path through so much disinformation and psychological warfare. And of course so much happened in between when the cameras weren’t rolling.

I am well into Volume II of my book series, and will be releasing it as soon as I can get it done and edited, adding it to the current free pdf available at StrawmanStory.info. The only question I have in nervous anticipation is will I be able to print it so as to make it permanent?

That’s up to you.

If you found any value in any of my above presented works, which represent literally my life for the last 10 years plus, then I am asking you without pride to make a donation today so that I may immortalize my journey’s end, by printing my books into a solid and preservable form immune from the controllers of this internet matrix. My path from here depends on you. Again, if you wish to have a copy of the book, I am asking a gift of $30 to cover printing and shipping, leaving me enough to hopefully print Volume II without such future groveling for funding. This will be my last effort in this regard, though I will keep writing and releasing for free my books that may or may not be printed.

Thank you for all who have donated so far, going way beyond, and for all your love and support. I have one last surprise I hope to pull off, a way to realize what I have been working towards. Should be a hoot if I can get it going. You’ll know when it happens, if it happens.

Until then, any radio shows I do will be posted at the archives. My other websites are:

To the followers of this blog, thank you for reading and subscribing and for all your comments and help over the years. My future books and perhaps a documentary or two are essentially replacing and will be linked to and announced on this blog, because quite frankly, at this point soundbites and clever stories and confrontations just can’t cut through such complete and evil designs. The parts never reveal the whole, especially when the parts are never presented as a whole. Debating the finer points of so many lies and fictions just doesn’t cut it for me anymore. I seek a higher path, a higher spiritual knowledge, and I hope we may meet someday on that path.

Until then… try to keep it Real, my friends. For the greatest and only True knowledge is the distinction and purposeful consciousness of what is self-evidently Real and what is fiction. And the strangest knowledge of all is that only artificial persons, places, and things need to be proven to fictionally exist, for these are not self-evident. Understand that, and no agent of that legal matrix of word magic can touch you.

Now, let’s see… what was all that stuff worth?

If the answer is nothing, then hey, it’s my fictional person’s “birth” day on August 8th, the day my vital statistics were civilly certified and registered! How about sending me a little something to support this happy artificial creation of a legal entity day, my joyous day of nativity as an emergence into this fictional realm of legal matrix day? Send a few words to wish me a happy bondservant day, congratulating me on my pretended, legalistic corporate birth as a “natural” legal person! Send a card to me as agent for service of process at my legally registered federal address, though I don’t think Hallmark (a government owned and traded corporation) makes a greeting card for being subject under Caesar’s district, not even a sympathy card.

Anyway, at least send me your greetings and salutations, and may your own artificial life be commercially fruitful in this open-air debtor’s prison on the upper levels hell.

My main, reliable email will be:

clint@strawmanstory.info

And by the way, just so you know, it is not that we are losing our democracy to tyranny, it is that democracy only ever leads to tyranny. Tyranny is the red-headed step-child of democracy. It is the fifth and final regime of every civilization as Plato predicated. Tyranny is voted in by the democratically poisoned society. Democracy is a warning that the end is near, and should not be celebrated as a good thing. Confused? It’s a chapter of my book, which I read live on the radio, here:

Finally, I have found this last piece of wisdom to share. Seek the intent of the words of the Bible. I guarantee it is the end of all quests for Reality and Truth. To seek the Bible is not to seek religion, but instead the Natural Law. No good researcher can possibly avoid it, though they can certainly demonize it and pretend it doesn’t apply to them. But I assure you it is the cornerstone of everything. It offers the only way out of this legal hell, for it is the foundation of self-government, self-Law, not just empty religion. My books go over all this with a fine-tooth comb. The Bible teaches you only how to be your True Self again, and thus to treat all men only as their True Self, never respecting reputation, titles, names, marks, and signs. To look upon all only by its source, and all men as we were all born into Nature. The Bible, again, is not religion. Rather, it is a guide-stone on how to religiously follow the Law that is causes a sanctuary from all of man’s false legal inventions. Some people drink coffee religiously, and some watch television sitcoms religiously every week. The difference between a being a member of some corporate religion (artificial person) and actually acting religiously (verb) according to the Law of Nature (God) is the difference between darkness and light, between ignorance and knowledge, and between fiction and reality.

What law are we under? The law of mammon. For the legal law always tells us the opposite of the Bible. The Bible says to respect only men, never their persons, while the legal law respects only persons, not men. A person in law may only deal with other persons, while a man of God (of Nature) may only deal with God’s Creatures. Think about this next time your government is trying to push transgender bathrooms and gender neutral status on your person. For person is the same word as status. In the fiction of legality, we are forced to respect the status of the man’s person, which has no place or existence in Nature. There are no words, no names in Reality, and the Laws of Nature will never actually be altered, except in make-believe and under false name and title (persona).

I have found every reasonable question I may ask to be answered in scripture. It is not what you have been told.

Author’s note: The following presentation is designed to give a general overview of how organized crime has replaced not only government, but the cherished institutions we’re trained like animals to participate in and respect the opinions of. The “syndicate” as is uncovered here is the foundation of all legitimacy and right granted to the worst of criminal enterprise. While the focus here is foundational, the reader may apply their knowledge of such subjects as Common Core, the Delphi Technique, Lobbying, special interests, consensus building, monopolies and trusts, grants, uniform codes and regulations, and all other psychological tools and conditioning that allow the unthinkable to permeate as normality within our government and its institutions. In order to comprehend just how vaccination, Geo-engineering, cloning, psychiatry, unnecessary live animal research, and so many otherwise immoral and unethical practices that would otherwise be shunned in society are instead accepted as normal and as “best practices” within the various institutions regulated by government, we must expose the centralized criminal organization that represents the authority behind those acceptations. And so here I present to you the underbelly of the beast – organized crime that I call the syndicate.

–=–Debunking Education: Exposing The Syndicate.–=–

.

–=–

“The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.”

–Allan Bloom, “The Closing of the American Mind”

–=–

“Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes,consume more resources than poorly educated people,
who tend to have lower incomes. In this case,
more education increases the threat to sustainability.”

–Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit Vol.2 2002

–=–

Have you ever seriously considered that education is the best and truest form of mass programming, or as Charlotte Iserbyt calls it in her now infamous book of primary research horror, The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America? Is there more to it than just tainted textbooks and the drive to make kids less intelligent? Is there a criminal element organized at the very top that can only maintain its control and authoritarian grip on industry through this institutionalized education process, never allowing deviation from the prescribed curriculum of professors (those who profess) in a closed loop university system?

Many have considered the fleeting fancy that this is so… but establishing without doubt this notion as the foundational and obvious disposition regarding the institution of education is another matter. Mrs. Iserbyt certainly does a good job of creating the case through documentation and historical perspective, but is there some deeper aspect to this that we can delve into to prove the fraud of education as a cover for the continued inducement of organized crime?

It is my intention here to do just that.

We generally bow down to popular opinion as the majority of “normal” and “educated” people use fallacious defenses against reasonable criticism towards the education system, like titling those who question the institution of university and education as “conspiracy freaks”, even when those tomes of research comes from a former presidential appointed politician to the Federal Department of Education like Mrs. Iserbyt, who has nothing to share but first hand knowledge.

In topics of such depth and misunderstanding, sometimes the proof is in the very foundation of the object to be proved.

Not only does the central education curriculum promote a fallacious normalcy bias to protect itself and its vested interest in most walks of corporate society (education as a perfectly normal requirement for “success” in industry), it re-presents to students and teachers false history to build that bias within its own learning tools, professing the most convenient of historical biases to promote the need of its own continuity – as the preserver and teacher of history. It categorizes everything into “subjects”, as if one part of life were totally separate from the other and therefore must be taught and learned as such, thus creating “experts” with no expertise in anything but a tunnel-visioned set of false-dialectics on their particular subject of expertise. In reality, the education system has an audacious underbelly that needs to be comprehended in today’s institutional and political forum, as new standards such as “Common Core” are being implemented for ever more global centralization of what is deemed as well-adjusted “normalcy”.

To understand just what this education system is designed to do to our young and mature minds alike, we must be able to examine without bias its true structure, intent, and authority; dating back many centuries and subsisting through many empires. You see, the institution of education is what is called a syndicate.

The syndicate has always been there. It involves the most important of industries: from education, medication, legalization, appropriation, codification, and regulation. In other words, for the syndicate to maintain control over society in both profit and in the perception of its falsely projected final authority, it must be in control of government (public) opinion, medical opinion, legal opinion, access to financial grants (free taxpayer money), and most importantly the group-think opinion of the university system from whence all credentialed minds flow.

This is accomplished in modern times through the creation and use of private, non-governmental organizations and associations (NGO’s), from the American Medical Association (AMA) to the American and International Bar Associations (ABA/IBA), the National Teachers Association (NTA) and Parent Teachers Association (PTA), to the National Governors Association (NGA), which by the way holds the copyright to Common Core Standards. These completely private associations work together to impose an organized syndicate that controls the flow and false-legitimacy (stamp of approval) of information while guaranteeing profit-friendly regulation of industry. The money is of course syndicated through the Federal Reserve System, another politically “independent” association, representing the control of funding via congressional committees – the literal creator of money. This process of money creation is called “appropriation”, and it makes new taxpayer money instantly available today by creating new national debt due tomorrow. In other words, all taxpayer money collected today by the central government syndicate was already spent yesterday, the main reason it can’t be paid down. For government is ultimately the head banker; the creator, appropriator, and regulator of currency; another very important cog in the organized criminal monopoly via its publicly perceived and accepted simulacrum of legitimacy, despite its known and admitted de facto (illegitimate) nature.

The syndicate ensures and insures trust monopolies and legal standards that promote those monopolies, even as it wages war on any information or other competition that may contradict it. The syndicate is not only the seller of lies it is the promoter and insurer of them, literally syndicating its lies through mass media. Through education, the general population never comprehends the true nature of the syndicate, for its ties are not readily comprehensible and it is certainly not taught in school! Each organized institution within the syndicate is presented as a separate self-governing entity, which appears to be individually scrutinized and regulated by the other institutions that lie within the same syndicate. And yet they are all working together in syndication to promote and keep their monopoly of fraud going, each promoting the legitimacy of the other.

This is the normalization of fraud. The syndicate even teaches the proper management of fraud in schools, while producing a stage-show for the benefit of the educated people, utilizing the predictive programming taught in schools and universities to enhance the ego and appeal of the masses to their own unreasonable but authorized (syndicated) authority. As long as the money and retirement benefits flow, the syndicate remains a legitimized criminal authority in all things.

It is not that the government is the syndicate, it is that the syndicate slowly infiltrated and took over the running of the government from its inception. And from the centralized criminal government were spawned these several institutions to control each facet of industry. Thus we have the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Labor, and the individual agencies of the FDA, EPA, the Fed, and so many others. Today, private associations make the rules for government and industry, and include members that are the law makers themselves, the attorneys, the doctors, the pharmacists, the teachers… even the students have their own student “association”. Each of these seemingly separate groups are the created and promoted non-governmental associations of the syndicate, and these member-groups ensure the future normalcy bias and inducement process of men and women into the work environment within the syndicate. And for those that are not members, we seemingly have no choice but to study from the textbooks that are created by the corporations and funded by the syndicate itself, for the syndicate also holds the exclusive power to bestow title, to give credentials, to grant degrees, and to graduate men and women with false honors and flattering titles. The syndicate makes the rules and requirements for graduation, which of course always include only syndicated (approved) texts and learning materials. And no other school or university may be established without the syndicate’s approval and adherence to its required standards and practices.

–=–Killing Us Softly: The Etymology Of Education–=–

So how do you define the word education?

To tame the wild beast…

Before we can fully recognize the roots and true intent of the mandatory education system implemented by the central syndicate, we must comprehend just who is behind that system, and just what its true intent is and always has been. The university education system, its foundation and a true description of its profess-ors, and all of the preparatory “grades” necessary to reach that university “degree” of education – to finally be granted permission to work within these syndicated corporate industries – is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, 1st Edition quite plainly:

SYNDIC. In the civil law. An advocate or patron; a burgess orrecorder; an agent or attorney who acts for a corporation or university; an actor or procurator; an assignee. In French law. The person who is commissioned by the courts to administer a bankruptcy. He fulfills the same functions as the trustee in English law, or assignee in America. The term is also applied to the person appointed to manage the affairs of a corporation.

SYNDICOS. One chosen by a college, municipality, etc., to defend its cause.

SYNDICATE. A university committee. A combination of persons or firms united for the purpose of enterprises too large for individuals to undertake; or a group of financiers who buy up the shares of a company in order to sell them at a profitbycreating a scarcity.

SYNDACALISM (n.) – In 1907, from French syndicalisme “movement to transfer ownership of means of production and distribution to industrial workers,” from syndical “of a labor union,” from syndic “chief representative” (see syndic). “Syndicalism” is in France the new, all-absorbing form of Labor’s conflict with Capital. Its growth has been so rapid that its gravity is not appreciated abroad. This year, even more than last, the strikes and other “direct action,” which it has combined, have upset the industrial life of the country, and forced the attention of Parliament and Government. [“The Nation,” June 20, 1907]

COMBINATION. A conspiracy, or confederation of men for unlawful or violent deeds. A union of different elements. A patent may be taken out for a new combination of existing machines.

CONFEDERATION – A league or compact for mutual support, particularly of princes, nations, or states. Such was the colonial government during the Revolution.

CONFEDERACY – In criminal law. The association or banding together of two or more persons for the purpose of committing an act or furthering an enterprise which is forbidden by law, or which, though lawful in itself, becomes unlawful when made the object of the confederacy. Conspiracy is a more technical term for this offense. The act of two or more who combine together to do any damage or injury to another, or to do any unlawful act. In equity pleading. An improper combination alleged to have been entered into between the defendants to a bill in equity. In international law. A league or agreement between two or more independent states whereby they unite for their mutual welfare and the furtherance of their common aims. The term may apply to a union so formed for a temporary or limited purpose, as in the case of an offensive and defensive alliance; but it is more commonly used to denote that species of political connection between two or more independent states by which a central government is created, invested with certain powers ofsovereignty, (mostly external,) and acting upon the several component states as its units, which, however, retain their sovereign powers for domestic purposes and some others. See FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

–=–

Of course, you are not supposed to know that the federal government is actually built with intent as a simple and explicit “conspiracy” to commit unlawful acts; defined as “a combination of persons or firms united for enterprises too large for individuals to undertake“. But you need to know that this nation was created by the Articles of Confederation, which may as well be called the Articles of Conspiracy. For these words mean exactly the same thing! Just why do you think the word conspiracy is so demonized in meaning and application within the media portion of the syndicate, while the founding word “confederation” is worshiped and made to appear as if it was historically God-given?

A conspiracy and a confederation are simply defined as two or more persons organizing to defraud others. Nothing more, nothing less. And that is exactly what the Articles of Confederation achieved, leading to the constitution; a compact of debt, obligation, and enfranchisement of all men into corporate persons and debtors in an open-air prison called the United States.

The idea of syndicalism was quite successful, luring men from their families, their self-sufficient lifestyle, and their inherited land and communities into the rent and mortgage schemes within the megalopolises and manufacturing bases, inducting us into the various industries of the syndicate with the advertising and promotion of products and services. Labor unions, a communist ideal, had the very real goal of combinations of common men for the purpose of a private protected confederacy within the corporate structure. Monopolies and trusts were built, and the syndicate’s so-called industrial revolution successfully altered America into a syndicalist nation.

Labeled as “equal rights”, labor unions pitted brother against brother using the legal law to protect favoritism of member workers despite the unheard cry of equality for all men. The family farm and self-sufficiency was replaced by syndicated reality of production in factory assembly lines, where men owned and kept nothing of their own labor. And the means of production was violently switched from the individual and local people into the corporate and industrial syndicate. Homemade became industry made. “Made in America” became “made in China”. The promise of more money and fatter pensions (the Biblical worship of mammon) secured the subversion of dignity, pride, and honor. The importance of the family unit became secondary to the importance of employment.

Once the means of production was centralized it could be exported, leaving a once independent people dependent on the retail imports and monopolized sweatshop industries of the syndicate and its foreign trade. Of course it was American syndicalist investments that built those foreign factories. Most importantly, through the education system (animal work training), men were learned with extremely limiting skills that could only be utilized in the syndicalist industries and machine shops, creating a new form of ultimately skill-less laborer highly trained in a single employable (usable) function that was worthless outside of the syndicate (in nature) and its machinery. And those singly educated men were rewarded for this institutionalized ignorance by union membership and the detrimental benefits therein bestowed.

This incentive-based culling instilled the evolution of free men into employed men; and the words free and self-sufficient became known as “unemployment”. Of course unemployment simply means non-taxed and not syndicated – a description of both the poor and the entrepreneur. Even the savvy man was convinced to become “self-employed”, so that he could be taxed and managed in his or her capacity to produce and compete with the syndicate. Of course, most small businesses fold under such pressure and rigged competition.

Today, with the syndicate strong and men weak in their knowledge and life experience away from nature and its laws, the slow dismantling of labor unions represents the syndication of them into the legal codes of the syndicate. With all men dependent upon it, the syndicate can now pay less and charge more, for the new generations haven’t a clue that it was ever any other way. Equal pay for equal labor – the pathetic cry of the oppressed.

EMPLOY‘ – verb transitive [Latin plico.] 1.To occupy the time, attention and labor of; to keep busy, or at work; to use. We employ our hands in labor; we employ our heads or faculties in study or thought; the attention is employed, when the mind is fixed or occupied upon an object; we employ time, when we devote it to an object. A portion of time should be daily employed in reading the scriptures, meditation and prayer; a great portion of life is employed to little profit or to very bad purposes. 2.To use as an instrument or means. We employ pens in writing, and arithmetic in keeping accounts. We employ medicines in curing diseases. 3.To use as materials in forming any thing. We employ timber, stones or bricks, in building; we employ wool, linen and cotton, in making cloth. 4.To engage in one’s service; to use as an agent or substitute in transacting business; to commission and entrust with the management of one’s affairs. The president employed an envoy to negotiate a treaty. Kings and States employ embassadors at foreign courts. 5.To occupy; to use; to apply or devote to an object; to pass in business; as, to employ time; to employ an hour, a day or a week; to employ one’s life. To employ one’s self, is to apply or devote one’s time and attention; to busy one’s self.

EMPLOY’ – noun That which engages the mind, or occupies the time and labor of a person; business; object of study or industry; employment. Present to grasp, and future still to find, The whole employ of body and of mind. 1.Occupation, as art, mystery, trade, profession. 2. Public office; agency; service for another.

SERV’ICE – noun [From Latin servitium.] 1. In a general sense, labor of body or of body and mind, performed at the command of a superior, or the pursuance of duty, or for the benefit of another. service is voluntary or involuntary. Voluntaryservice is that of hired servants, or of contract, or of persons who spontaneously perform something for another’s benefit. Involuntaryservice is that of slaves, who work by compulsion. 2.The business of a servant; menial office. 3. Attendance of a servant. 4. Place of a servant; actual employment of a servant; as, to be out of service. 5.Any thing done by way of duty to a superior… 6.Attendance on a superior.

–=–

Voluntary servitude… now where have I heard that before? No one may wish to ponder the role of money and monopolized industry as the instigators of voluntary slavery, but the shoe certainly fits. This brave new institutionalized world was created to replace the old forms of master and slave relationship, evolving the slave mentality into one of common patriotic service to industry and state (which are the same thing) – the basis of functionality of the syndicate. The words voluntary and involuntary are now so intertwined that most people have no idea what the word slave really means, simply because they can choose which form of labor they are employed (used) in as service to the syndicate.

Of course, modern ideas of slavery involve Hollywood’s version of the black man with chains around his neck.

But let’s go back to a time when Webster still roamed the land, speaking truth in his defining of terms.

SLAVE, noun 1. A person who is wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no will of his own, but whose person and services are wholly under the control of another. In the early state of the world, and to this day among some barbarous nations, prisoners of war are considered and treated as slaves. The slaves of modern times are more generally purchased, like horses and oxen. 2.One who has lost the power of resistance; or one who surrenders himself to any power whatever; as a slave to passion, to lust, to ambition. 3.A mean person; one in the lowest state of life. 4. A drudge; one who labors like a slave… (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

SLA’VERY, noun [See Slave.] 1.Bondage; the state of entire subjection of one person to the will of another. slavery is the obligation to labor for the benefit of the master, without the contract of consent of the servant. slavery may proceed from crimes, from captivity or from debt. slavery is also voluntary or involuntary; voluntary, when a person sells or yields his own person to the absolute command of another; involuntary, when he is placed under the absolute power of another without his own consent. slavery no longer exists in Great Britain, not in the northern states of America. 2. The offices of a slave; drudgery. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

And so you see, a slave by any other employable name, is still merely a slave.

Now, one might fallaciously argue (advocate) the fact that because they are paid equally as others in their employ (use) or because they are part of a labor union (a syndicalist) making them house slaves who receive a bit more pay than those other supposedly equal slaves, that employment is not actual slavery. Read again! The use of a currency which represents nothing but debt is not designed as a payment tool, but as a limiting object for voluntary slaves so they never get ahead. The wealthy elite of the syndicate aren’t as much interested in obtaining wealth as they are in having enough wealth so as to have no objects in front of them limiting their own freedom within their own syndicate. The only way this can happen is if they employ the rest of the population with limited circulation of money, obstructing their ability at self-sufficiency through currency exchange. And through the system of education this false sense of freedom is instilled upon the common class so that they volunteer against their best interests to be employed within the syndicate, never self-actualizing their own disposition. Our freedom is only what the state allows it to be, for the word freedom is yet another misunderstood word, and its true definition is not taught in public school (training of animals for future employment).

Employment is like addiction. Sure, you can claim that you can quit your job at any time, but then how will you quench your addiction to buying stuff, and for that matter your addiction to food and shelter? After all, it’s all but illegal to obtain food without money or permission from government to hunt and fish! Raw dairy is outlawed and highly regulated. Live animal restrictions abound. And small backyard gardens are next on the regulation chopping block.

But it’s a free country…

All slaves and livestock are of course free within their master’s borders and fences.

Bouvier’s 1856 Dictionary of Law, which was commissioned to be “ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION”, explains what freedom really is…

FREEDOM –Liberty; the right to do what is not forbidden by law. Freedom does not preclude the idea of subjection to law; indeed, it presupposes the existence of some legislative provision, the observance of which insures freedom to us, by securing the like observance from others.

–=–

And so a whole population is employed (in usury) by the slave-masters of the syndicate, who train the population in school to believe in a false notion of what freedom actually is. And the population then runs around claiming (professing) to be a free people while never knowing that freedom means forced servitude to the laws created by the syndicate and legislated though the state… or else a boot to the face. And many are employed (used) to be the boot against their own fellow slaves, forcefully ensuring a perpetually indentured society; paid mercenaries called police and military whose authority doesn’t actually exist but for the belief by the overpowering 100’s of millions that it does. A uniform and badge goes a long way in instilling faith in what does not exist but in name and credential only.

–=–The Dictator:Institutionalization Of God’s Legal Laws–=–

Like every religion-based government institution of the past, the United States claims God as its foundation, somehow making right and equitable the economic enslavement of all people within its borders through its own legally bound doctrine of law. This will be clarified as we proceed…

Perhaps we should call this syndicate what it really is… a confederation theory.

The word syndicate is broken down as such:

SYN – “together with, jointly; alike; at the same time,” from Greek syn “with, together with, along with, in the company of.”

DICTION – “expression of ideas in words,” from Late Latin dictionem, a noun of action from dic–, past participle stem of Latin dicere“speak, tell, say“, related to dicare“proclaim,dedicate,” and from Old English teon“to accuse,” tæcan“to teach“).

–=–

This combination creates the foundation of an unseen dictatorship. It is after all foolish to believe that the word dictator refers to just one individual as dictator. Congress is certainly a dictator via its E Pluribus Unum, (out of many, one) enfranchisement. Congress is simply a confederation; a combination of men who syndicate.

DICTATOR – late 14c., from Latin dictator, agent noun from dictare(see dictate (v.)). Transferred sense of “one who has absolute power or authority” in any sphere is from c.1600. In Latin use, a dictator was a judge in the Roman republic temporarily invested with absolute power.

To put it simply, a dictatorship is what one calls the state of being governed by those who dictate the law as “one” body politic (one corporate body). In this way, any form of government is thus a dictatorship, no matter how large a “combination” and “confederation” those lawmakers account for, and no matter how many constituents they claim to re-present. Even a so-called “democracy” is simply a dictatorship of the foolish majority over the foolish minority, neither group ever comprehending what a simple dictatorship is – a non-stop cruise-line; destination: subjection and extortion. And the majority and the minority never comprehend their equally important parts played in the legitimization of the syndicated congressional dictatorship simply through the act of voting – unwittingly confirming through voting cycle after cycle the dictatorial combination you now know as “the syndicate.”

To vote is to legitimize the syndicate.

How many times have we heard that this candidate is bought and paid for by “Big Pharma”, that this party has sold out to “Big Oil”, and that those party affiliated senators support banks over people? Well of course they do. They are all part of the same monopolized syndicate. And just so you understand, political parties are also non-governmental, private associations, which have infiltrated and now control the actions and reputations of politicians.

It would be immature to simply believe and dismiss this association (combination/confederation) of regulators, lawmakers, and corporations as simple greed. For the syndicate thrives on power and authority as any dictatorship has and will. Its purpose is not payoffs behind the scenes, but perpetual control over the entire population by its combined brotherhood and its spawn. Greed is too simplistic. The syndicate wishes to play god.

So that we fully understand, a syndicate is defined above as a university committee. In case you haven’t noticed, most of the research grants and studies that are created, that directly correlate to the medical and pharmaceutical industries, come from and are completed through the university system. Most of the other research is done at these medical and pharma companies themselves, where they literally test and report on their own laboratory creations funded by taxpayer dollars in the 100’s of billions; labeled as research and development (R&D) grants. Free money…

The FDA, as an integral and completely controlled regulatory agency of the syndicate, sweeps in for “public” good and consumption, placing its required stamp of approval on these harmful and deadly pharmaceutical drugs without ever testing any of them itself, instead relying on the “integrity” of its own syndicate corporations (combination/confederation/conspiracy) to promote and advocate its own portion of the syndicated monopoly. The word “public” is just another definition of E Pluribus Unum – from many voices, one false consensus-based opinion (out of many, one), where the voices of the many are never heard by the dictator-ship sailing us all into oblivion. For it is the opinion of the syndicate in the end that retains the right to possess the only opinion that has any “authority”.

Massive amounts of taxpayer money ends up in the university system as well, mostly hidden from the public within investment funds and touted as research grants, not to mention unreasonably high tuition rates to pay for it all. The syndicate creates the requirement of education to enter into industry, and so it can charge anything it wishes for a diploma allowing one to be employable in its syndicate. Of course the government is always listed as a patent holder of whatever novel disease or counterpart medical breakthrough, drug, or vaccine is created through the education/research part of the syndicate, for it supplies a direct link to the wallets of all the taxpayers of the United States. And that is the ultimate power of all – the power of the purse. But the purposeful side-effect of this syndicate insures a steady influx of patients that are made sick by its forced monopoly on all things food, health, medical, and pharmaceutical. And the syndicate protects itself through its total control of the BAR associations that in turn control the courts and thus public opinion. In essence, the population are mere guinea pigs for the syndicate, suffering and sometimes reporting negative side-effects only after drugs are already approved as “safe and effective” by the stage-play act known as the FDA.

The correct legal term for this fact, ironically, is that we are indeed legal patients of the syndicate. We allow the syndicate to use us exactly as they wish: as test-subjects. And without legal remedy of complaint due to the syndication and limitation of those legal avenues and the associations that run and regulate them, we are indeed merely a population of full-time patients:

PATIENT, adjective pa’shent. [Latin patiens.] 1. Having the quality of enduring evils without murmuring or fretfulness; sustaining afflictions of body or mind with fortitude, calmness or christian submission to the divine will; as a patient person, or a person of patient temper. It is followed by or before the evil endured; as patient of labor or pain; patient of heat or cold. 2.Not easily provoked; calm under the sufferance of injuries or offenses; not revengeful. 3.Persevering; constant in pursuit or exertion; calmly diligent. Whatever I have done is due to patient thought. 4. Not hasty; not over eager or impetuous; waiting or expecting with calmness or without discontent… (noun)A person or thing that received impressions from externalagents; he or that which is passively affected. Malice is a passion so impetuous and precipitate, that it often involves the agent and the patient 1.A person diseased or suffering bodily indisposition. It is used in relation to the physician; as, the physician visits his patient morning and evening. 2. It is sometimes used absolutely for a sick person. It is wonderful to observe how inapprehensive these patients are of their disease. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

We, the citizen-patients seem to have no inkling that our collective disease (political, mental, and physical) is purposefully caused and carefully managed by the syndicate, and that the syndicate is the disease of government. This gives new definition to the concept of “managed healthcare.” Instead, we can behold an abused and decimated population base that is so ill and not of right mind that perhaps it cannot muster the mental and physical response to fight back or seek revenge. And so the viscous cycle of disease continues as a profitable business-as-usual model under the syndicate, and the “people” remain hopelessly beholden to its authority as nothing more than mental patients.

The concept and goals of what is called advocacy are not at all dissimilar in function to what is today known by title as lobbyists, pundits, or political shills. An attorney, also known as an advocate or agent, literally re-presents some person or thing within an official capacity (an artificial realm of legal) in order to attempt to legitimize and sway opinions in favor of that subject matter. An advocate’s duty is to shift public opinion in order to create a normalcy bias and thus a general acceptance to the object of his or her advocacy.

So how does the syndicate utilize advocates in its total control system?

To start, the majority of our legislature (the law-makers) are generally attorneys, all pledged to the same private BAR association. Many of our presidents, including Obama, have been pledged attorneys as well. Likewise, most governors, and of course all legal persons in the Judicial Branch and Justice System are now required to be BAR member attorneys, while the Supreme Court of the United States generally refuses to hear non-BAR presented cases. Sometimes we forget that a member of some thing is also an advocate of that thing, for without that fictional thing, their fictional legal title would not exist. And so having BAR members as advocates of an International Bar Association full of advocate-attorneys working in syndication as the law-makers, executive force, and judicial overseer seems to be an obvious combination and confederacy with just a cursory glance. Our government is full of advocates and is thus in a severe epidemic state of conflict of interest. And the rest are bankers, doctors, accountants, and other professionals that hold their credentials and titles only because of and on behalf of the fictional institutions within the syndicate, creating not a government but an advocacy group posing as government – a simulation of legitimacy and of reality.

In other words, by default, any person with a diploma and job title that requires a college “education” must therefore hold (confirm) the fraudulent syndicate and government to be legitimate while being an unwitting advocate of the education system that bestows the allowance to be titled. Any person with a vested interest in some thing will always advocate for that thing, especially if their power and authority (credentials) stem solely from that very thing – the creator of those credentials. And enticing us as prostitutes with a bit of syndicated money helps ensure advocacy. Institutionalized “professionals” can seldom be expected to bite the hand and source of their own fraudulent existence as titled and credentialed professionals within the syndicate. Their very careers depend upon the existence and continuity of the syndicate, without which their flattering titles would hold no meaning or authority. They are literally professed as being experts, thus the term professional. If you understand this, you understand the power of the syndicate over morals, ethics, reason, and logic, which are no longer contemplations of men but rather defined concepts of the syndicate, their true meaning squashed by statute and legalese. The syndicate, for all intents and purposes, is the god of such concepts. The syndicate is the creator of titled gentry such as doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, CEO’s, and politicians. And so the monopoly extends not only over industry, but over the ethical and moral capacity and general operating procedure of those industries, including government itself.

The syndicate then places its paid, mind controlled advocates into its various controlled institutions, such as education and medicine.

From these places of perceived credibility and monopolized authority, through officially syndicate-credentialed scientists, biologists, professors, teachers, and research specialists, the syndicate can literally make anything happen, get anything approved, make anything appear and be defined as moral and ethical, and create any exception and acceptation to any rule or code (legal exemption) it wishes. It can do this simply because its advocates are everywhere within these institutions, ensuring pro-syndicate cause and effect models to create the desired “public opinion,” E Pluribus Unum,without question. They are the presidents, the faculty, the doctorates, the legal council, the regulators, the professors, the professionals, and the go-betweens.

The word advocate is defined as:

AD’VOCATE, noun [Latin advocatus, from advoco, to call for, to plead for; of ad and voco, to call. See vocal.] 1.advocate in its primary sense, signifies, one who pleads the cause of another in a court of civil law. Hence, 2.One who pleads the cause of another before any tribunal or judicial court, as a barrister in the English courts. We say, a man is a learned lawyer and an able advocate In Europe, advocates have different titles, according to their particular duties. Consistorial advocates, in Rome, appear before the Consistory, in opposition to the disposal of benefices. Elective advocates are chosen by a bishop, abbot, or chapter, with license from the prince. Feudal advocates were of a military kind, and to attach them to the church, had grants of land, with power to lead the vassals of the church war. Fiscal advocates, in ancient Rome, defended causes in which the public revenue was concerned. Juridical advocates became judges, in consequence of their attending causes in the earl’s court. Matricular advocates defended the cathedral churches. Military advocates were employed by the church (government) to defend it by arms, when force gave law to Europe. Some advocates were called nominative, from their being nominated by the pope or king; some regular, from their being qualified by a proper course of study. Some were supreme; others, subordinate. Advocate, in the German polity, is a magistrate, appointed in the emperor’s name, to administer justice. Faculty of advocates, in Scotland, is a society of eminentlawyers, who practice in the highest courts, and who are admitted members only upon the severest examination, at three different times. It consists of about two hundred members, and from this body are vacancies on the bench usually supplied. Lord advocate in Scotland, the principal crown lawyer, or prosecutor of crimes. Judge advocate in courts martial, a person who manages the prosecution. In English and American courts, advocates are the same as counsel, or counselors. In England, they are of two degrees, barristers and serjeants; the former, being apprentices or learners, cannot, by ancient custom, be admitted serjeants, till of sixteen years standing. 3.One who defends, vindicates, or espouses a cause, by argument; one who is friendly to; as, an advocate for peace, or for the oppressed. In scripture, Christ is called an advocate for his people. We have an advocate with the father. 1John 2:1. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

AD’VOCATE – (verb transitive)To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal; to support or vindicate. Those who advocate a discrimination. The Duke of York advocated the amendment. The Earl of Buckingham advocated the original resolution. The idea of a legislature, consisting of a single branch, though advocated by some, was generally reprobated… A part only of the body, whose cause be advocates, coincide with him in judgment. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

ADVOCATE – See Judge-Advocate. An assistant ; an associate in conducting a lawsuit. A person who makes a profession of presenting cases orally. Of advocates, or (as we more generally call them) counsel, there are two species or degrees: barristers and sergeants. In the United States no distinction is made between an advocate and an attorney. (–W.C. Anderson 1889 Dictionary of Law)

FACULTY –noun [Latin facultas, from facio, to make.] 1. That power of the mind or intellect which enables it to receive, revive or modify perceptions; as the faculty of seeing, of hearing, of imagining, of remembering, etc.: or in general, the faculties may be called the powers or capacities of the mind. 2.The power of doing any thing; ability… 3. The power of performing any action, natural, vital or animal. The vital faculty is that by which life is preserved. 4.Facility of performance; the peculiar skill derived from practice, or practice aided by nature; habitual skill or ability; dexterity; adroitness; knack. One man has a remarkable faculty of telling a story; another, of inventing excuses for misconduct; a third, of reasoning; a fourth, of preaching. 5. Personal quality; disposition or habit, good or ill. 6.Power; authority… 9.Privilege; a right or power granted to a person by favor or indulgence, to do what by law he may not do; as the faculty of marrying without the bans being first published, or of ordaining a deacon under age. The archbishop of Canterbury has a court of faculties, for granting such privileges or dispensations. 10.In colleges, the masters and professors of the several sciences. One of the members or departments of a university. In most universities there are four faculties; of art, including humanity and philosophy; of theology; of medicine; and of law. In America, the faculty of a college or university consists of the president, professors and tutors. The faculty of advocates, in Scotland, is a respectable body of lawyers who plead in all causes before the Courts of Session, Justiciary and Exchequer. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

COUNSELOR, noun 1.Any person who gives advice; but properly one who is authorized by natural relationship, or by birth, office or profession, to advise another in regard to his future conduct and measures. Ahithophel was Davids counselor. His mother was his counselor to do wickedly. 2Chronicles 22:1. In Great Britain, the peers of the realm are hereditary counselor of the crown. 2.The members of a counsel; one appointed to advise a king or chief magistrate, in regard to the administration of the government. 3. One who is consulted by a client in a law case; one who gives advice in relation to a question of law; one whose profession is to give advice in law, andmanage causes for clients. Privy counselor is a member of a privy counsel. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

COUNSEL, noun [Latin , to consult; to ask, to assail.] 1.Advice; opinion, or instruction, given upon request or otherwise, for directing the judgment or conduct of another; opinion given upon deliberation or consultation. Every purpose is established by counselProverbs 20:5. Thou hast not hearkened to my counsel2 Chronicles 25:16. 2.Consultation; interchange of opinions. We took sweet counsel together. Psalms 55:14. 3.Deliberation; examination of consequences. They all confess that, in the working of that first cause, counsel is used, reason followed, and a way observed. 4.Prudence; deliberate opinion or judgment, or the faculty or habit of judging with caution. O how comely is the wisdom of old men, and understanding and counsel to men of honor. Ecclus. 25. The law shall perish from the priest, and counsel from the ancients. Ezekiel 7:26. 5.In a bad sense, evil advice or designs; art; machination. The counsel of the froward is carried headlong. Job 5:13. 6.Secrecy; the secrets entrusted in consultation; secret opinions or purposes. Let a man keep his own counsel 7. In a scriptural sense, purpose; design; will; decree. What thy counsel determined before to be done. Acts 4:28. To show the immutability of his counselHebrews 6:17. 8.Directions of Gods word. Thou shalt guide me by thy counselPsalms 73:24. 9.The will of God or his truth and doctrines concerning the way of salvation. I have not shunned to declare to you all the counsel of God. Acts 20:27. 10. Those who give counsel in law; any counselor or advocate, or any number of counselors, barristers or sergeants; as the plaintiffs counsel or the defendants counsel. The attorney-general and solicitor-general are the kings counsel. In this sense, the word has no plural; but in the singular number, is applicable to one or more persons. – (verb transitive) [Latin] 1.To give advice or deliberate opinion to another for the governmentof his conduct; to advise. I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire. Revelations 3. 2. To exhort, warn, admonish, or instruct. We ought frequently to counsel our children against the vices of the age. They that will not be counseled, cannot be helped. 3.To advise or recommend; as, to counsel a crime. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

Note here that the word “god” and the word king, magistrate, prince, and pope are one in the same, explaining the repeated Bible references above. In other words, these counselors are placed throughout the syndicate’s institutions to specifically advocate for the will of the magistrates (gods) of the syndicate. This use of a religious concept in government and its frightening reality will be further defined below.

It is quite difficult to comprehend the fact that the University system is indeed packed full of attorneys (advocates) and counselors. After all, reasonably speaking, it would seem fairly odd that so many attorney/advocates should be required within a university, other than perhaps in the legal studies department. But this misconception stems from a total lack of comprehension regarding the true intent and purpose of the education system, and more to the point its important roles played out within the syndicate by these attorney advocates and counselors to maintain its illusion of legitimacy and authority. A simple online search uncovers the many attorney-based, often BAR membership required jobs available within the university structure. And because of this revelation, we receive a new understanding of just what this organized advocacy group we call the BAR Associations of the world really entails. For advocates are not simply lawyers, they are also accountants, financial officers, statisticians, councilors, teachers, expert witnesses, fellows, presidents, legislators, professionals, prefects, principles, etc…

Take for example this recent job posting for the well known medical university institution (syndication) of John’s Hopkins University:

“The Johns Hopkins University offers a one-year fellowship to a graduate of an accredited U.S. Law School. Commencing on or about October 16, 2012, the Fellow will spend one year working at the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel. The Vice President and General Counsel is the chief legal officer for the Johns Hopkins University. With a staff of nine attorneys, the Office of the Vice President and General Counsel provides legal representation and advice to the University and its trustees, officers, and employees acting on its behalf.”

“The office provides advice on a broad range of legal issues affecting the University, including labor andemployment, government contracts and grants, litigation, investigations, faculty appointments, student issues, non-profit law, academic freedom, privacy, intellectual property, technology transfer, clinical practice, safety and environmental law, research and other compliance, health law and other legal issues relating to the School of Medicine, philanthropy, investments, real estate, international issues, business transactions, financing and tax matters. The attorneys prepare and negotiate contracts to which the University is a party. The office drafts and reviews proposed University policies. The office represents the University in litigation and before regulatory agencies. As in-house counsel, the office attorneys are in the unique position of being part of the goal-setting and strategic planning for the University. This role gives office attorneys the opportunity to do a significant amount of preventative lawyering, including running training programs and assisting with University compliance with federal, state, and local obligations. The Fellowship position provides recent law graduates an opportunity to work closely with all of the attorneys in the Office. The Fellow can expect to do legal research and prepare memoranda of law; review and draft agreements and procedures as well as litigation materials; and attend meetings related to the work assigned. The attorneys will review the Fellow’s work closely and meet with him or her to provide feedback. By providing exposure to the work and challenges of a university counselor’s office, the Fellowship is an excellent opportunity for those with an interest in the field of higher education law or any of the substantive areas in which we practice.”

Well gosh golly, I can’t imagine why so many attorney’s are needed at a school… but I can imagine the billable hours they must accumulate. I wonder why tuition is really as high as it is in most universities? Any ideas…?

And in point of fact, is the reader at all comfortable with the roles described here where attorneys are part of the “goal-setting and strategic planning for the University?”

These advocates are the people you see on government panels as the invited guest speakers, often referred to as “experts” or “expert witnesses”. In other words, they are PAID WITNESSES! They did not actually witness anything regarding the case. They are there simply to promote and advocate for the syndicate to keep business as usual and to counter any actual evidence to their contrary. If the syndicate needs an expert witness, you can be assured it calls upon its roster of advocates within the education or other institutionalized (syndicated) systems. And any former employee of the education system that relied on grant money can attest that with the appointed position and research grants allotted to advocates, their positive advocacy for (and never against) the university system and all other parts of the syndicate involved must be maintained. So many good men and women with syndicated titles have lost their good name and standing within for simply criticizing the syndicate for what it really is – a confirmed fraud promoting institutionalized fraud. And they find out the hard way just how organized the fraud and crime really is only after losing everything the syndicate bestowed upon them in the first place, from research grants to reputation, while having been completely severed (black-balled) with regards to access to employment and syndication.

Advocates can appear in so many different ways, and are generally considered to be re-presentations of public opinion. They represent the people E Pluribus Unum style (from many opinions, one opinion), and through their official and legal capacity as attorneys they advocate for the criminal syndicate while pretending to be concerned parents, non-partial witnesses, and invited impartial experts. With countless cases of fraud and conspiracy decking the courts regarding doctors, judges, scientists, and other advocates of the syndicate, one would be hard-pressed to believe a single thing that comes out of the mouth of any “expert” presented by government or its syndicated corporate monopolies of medical, pharmaceutical, scientific, regulatory, legal, or financial advocacy.

For the court’s opinion is alas constituted in finality as the now official “public opinion”, creating even a monopoly on opinion itself through consensus. And the advocate as “expert witness” is key to ensuring the triumph of this syndicated opinion over any contrary outside notion.

OPINION, noun opin’yon. [Latin opinio, from opinor, to thing, Gr., Latin suppono.] 1. The judgment which the mind forms of any proposition, statement, theory or event, the truth or falsehood of which is supported by a degree of evidence that renders it probably, but does not produce absolute knowledge or certainty. It has been a receivedopinion that all matter is comprised in four elements. This opinion is proved by many discoveries to be false. From circumstances we form opinions respecting future events. OPINION is when the assent of the understanding is so far gained by evidence of probability, that it rather inclines to one persuasion than to another, yet not without a mixture of uncertainty or doubting. 2.The judgment or sentiments which the mind forms of persons or their qualities. We speak of a good opinion a favorable opinion a bad opinion a private opinion and public or general opinion etc. Friendship gives a man a peculiar right and claim to the good opinion of his friend. 3.Settled judgment or persuasion; as religious opinions; political opinion 4.Favorable judgment; estimation. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

To verbally or in writing opinion a subject is to magically transform through word magic often devious and misleading concepts into a tangible (written) official thing (legal law), making that concept accepted as normal no matter how ridiculous or despised it may be. Legal law can only be proven to exist via court opinion. The court transforms through opinion and thus final judgement falsities and lies into “facts” of law – institutionalized and syndicated bullshit, if you will. And the court is the representation of the public, as “the People” vs. everything and anyone. It thus creates opinion as a fiction of law. Yes, it exists only as a fiction. And a fiction only exists with belief and consent to its validity by the “public”, which is of course re-presented as “government”. Fiction is literally nothing more than a confirmed and accepted fraud (lie).

And government is a fiction…

As we can read, institutional thoughts need not be proven (as by scientific and medical research and through deliberation) to become what is then the “official” legal opinion of the syndicate, which then disseminates its own court-ruled opinion as “public opinion”. You could call this the doctrinal religion of the state, preached and taught by advocate profess-ors of the syndicate.

So many drugs that are labeled safe and effective by the regulatory portion of the syndicate called FDA are often years later revealed by the many maimed and harmed “patients” within the public or general population as extremely life-threatening, poisonous, cancer-causing, or as causing any number of other serious “side-effects” not listed in the syndicated pretrials, studies, and inserts of those drugs. And the FDA labels them as unsafe or ineffective only after many “patients” have been seriously damaged or died by them after initial approval, during the time period when the FDA’s official opinion (confirmed fraud) was that they were “safe and effective”.

This consensus of thought is often reached by committee, which generally consists of advocates (experts) paid by the syndicate to promote its lies. These advocates are everywhere, attorneys acting as agents of the syndicate while also playing the part of school teacher or professor, scientist or pharmacologist, expert or professional, etc.

And just what is a “committee”, Mr. Black, when considering that a syndicate is defined as a “university committee”?

Is it really just an advocacy group of attorneys disguised as caring professionals with the public’s best interest at heart?

(Hint: The syndicate is re-presented as public! It is the public!!!)

COMMITTEE – In practice. An assembly or board of persons to whom the consideration or management of any matter is committed or referred by some court. An individual or body to whom others have delegated or committed a particular duty, or who have taken on themselves to perform it in the expectation of their act being confirmed by the body they profess to represent or act for. The term is especially applied to the person or persons who are invested, by order of the proper court, with the guardianship of the person and estate of one who has been adjudged a lunatic. In parliamentary law. A portion of a legislative body, comprising one or more members, who are charged with the duty of examining some matter specially referred to them by the house, or of deliberating upon it, and reporting to the house the result of their investigations or recommending a course of action. A committee may be appointed for one special occasion, or it may be appointed to deal with all matters which may be referred to it during a whole session or during the life of the body. In the latter case, it is called a “standing committee.” It is usually composed of a comparatively small number of members, but may include the whole house. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

CONFIRM – To complete or establish that which was imperfect or uncertain; to ratify what has been done without authority or insufficiently. To confirm is to make firm that which was before infirm. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

CONFIRMATION – A contract by which that which was infirm, imperfect, or subject to be avoided is made firm and unavoidable. A conveyance of an estate or right in esse, whereby a voidable estate is made sure and unavoidable, or whereby a particular estate is increased. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

–=–

To be clear, a committee is another word for combination or confederacy (conspiracy). It is a committee of persons (secretly or openly representing the syndicate), all of whom work within the syndicate monopoly, while appearing to the public at large as a meeting of opposing sides. But in reality, a committee is mere formality to fool the viewing public (which contains no actual legal voice) into believing that the outcome of the committee’s opinion is in the best interest of the population (the many), and not in fact just for the continuity and profit of the syndicate (the one). This is like trusting the opinion of a bunch (combination) of oil company executives who meet in committee to decide the correct course to take for an oil spill. The syndicate has one goal as a corporation: PROFIT AND GAIN. To achieve its end, it must create a false sense of consensus through committee advocacy. So perhaps it is easier to comprehend the fraudulent nature of committee hearings in government if you just realize that every member stands to profit from within the syndicate from his or her bestowed title, and that the general population is ultimately just the taxpaying customer and consumer of the syndicate monopoly – the patients of the syndicate.

Ultimately, this government stage-play is just that – an act. The statute laws created are even called Acts. And of course everyone should know by now that actors in a play are nothing more than paid, professional liars. Nothing more, nothing less. Advocates engage in the art of lying. Their term of art is always double-speak. They lie as best they can simply to ensure that the act goes on in syndication without end (think: The Truman Show)…

PLAYER –nounOne who plays in any game or sport. 1. An idler. 2.An actor of dramatic scenes; one whose occupation is to imitate characters on the stage. 3.A mimic. 4. One who performs on an instrument of music. 5.A gamester. 6.One that acts a part in a certain manner.

ACTOR – noun 1.He that acts or performs; an active agent. 2.He that represents a character or acts a part in a play; a stage player. 3. Among civilians, an advocate or proctor in civil courts or causes.

AGENT, noun 1.An actor; one that exerts power, or has the power to act; as, a moral agent 2.An active power or cause; that which has the power to produce an effect; as, heat is a powerful agent 3.A substitute, deputy, or factor; one entrusted with the business of another; an attorney; a minister.

PERFORMER –nounOne that performs any thing, particularly in an art; as a good performer on the violin or organ; a celebrated performer in comedy or tragedy, or in the circus.

PORTRAYER –nounOne who paints, draws to the life or describes.

(–All definitions from Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

The true nature of every politician, as agents of the syndicate.

–=– The Science Fiction of Truth: Practice Makes Perfect –=–

Doctors practice “medicine”.

Nurses practice “health”.

Lawyers practice “law”.

Bankers practice “banking”.

Preachers practice “religion”.

Teacher’s practice “education”.

Somewhere along the way tools such as the “scientific method” were trans-mutated into the institutions of their name, such as the institution of “science”. This created the doctrine of “science,” as if the tool of measuring and arriving at a scientific theory was ever meant to arrive at a final conclusion. This doctrine of written words is what is now called “science”. It does not teach the method as much as it teaches a syndicated preference of the perceived outcome of the method. Science is often taught as past discoveries that should not be challenged or improved upon, for new data is inconvenient to the established doctrinal models. This, of course, is nothing new. The science of Earth was that it was officially flat, until the doctrine was changed into the current description of round. It was heresy to claim anything else, for the religious government of science is of God, not method. Nothing has really changed. And the industry and syndicated education of science ignores the ethical lessons learned along the way in order to create a purely unscientific simulation of the scientific method, making it possible for the syndicate to legalize the most horrific of what it refers to as “scientific practices.”

And this model of taking an adjective or verb (to educate/scientific) and turning it into a noun/name/title (the institution of education and of science) was essential in the process of institutionalizing every uncontrollable action of man. For it is now illegal to help another in need without license from the state to practice that help as a profession. And in order to get that license, one must pay tuition and get credentialed by the syndicate so that one’s charity becomes an employable profit model for the corporate biosphere.

Notice the difference between the verb and noun (name) forms of the word practice below, from Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language:

PRAC’TICE, noun [Gr. to act, to do, to make; Eng. to brook, and broker; Latin fruor, for frugor or frucor, whence fructus, contracted into fruit; frequens.] 1.Frequent or customary actions; a succession of acts of a similar kind or in a like employment; as the practice of rising early or of dining late; the practice of reading a portion of Scripture morning and evening; the practice of making regular entries of accounts; the practice of virtue or vice. Habit is the effect of practice 2.Use; customary use. Obsolete words may be revived when they are more sounding or significant than those in practice 3.Dexterity acquired by use. [Unusual.] 4.Actual performance; distinguished from theory. There are two functions of the soul, contemplation and practice according to the general division of objects, some of which only entertain our speculations, others employ our actions. 5.Application of remedies; medical treatment of diseases. Two physicians may differ widely in their practice 6.Exercise of any profession; as the practice of law or of medicine; the practice of arms. 7.Frequent use; exercise for instruction or discipline. The troops are daily called out for practice 8.Skillful or artful management; dexterity in contrivance or the use of means; art; stratagem; artifice; usually in a bad sense. He sought to have that by practice which he could not by prayer. [This use of the word is genuine; from Latin experior. It is not a mistake as Johnson supposes. See the Verb.] 9. A rule in arithmetic, by which the operations of the general rules are abridged in use.

PRAC’TICE, verb transitive [From the noun. The orthography of the verb ought to be the same as of the noun; as in notice and to notice.] 1.To do or perform frequently, customarily or habitually; to perform by a succession of acts; as, to practice gaming; to practice fraud or deception; to practice the virtues of charity and beneficence; to practice hypocrisy. Isaiah 32:1. Many praise virtue who do not practice it. 2.To use or exercise any profession or art; as, to practice law or medicine; to practice gunnery or surveying. 3. To use or exercise for instruction, discipline or dexterity. [In this sense, the verb is usually intransitive.] 4.To commit; to perpetrate; as the horrors practiced at Wyoming. 5.To use; as a practiced road. [Unusual.]

PRAC’TICE, verb intransitive To perform certain acts frequently or customarily, either for instruction, profit, or amusement; as, to practice with the broad sword; to practice with the rifle. 1. To form a habit of acting in any manner. They shall practice how to live secure… 3.To try artifices. Others, by guilty artifice and arts – Of promis’d kindness, practic’d on our hearts. 4.To use evil arts or stratagems… 5.To use medical methods or experiments. I am little inclined to practice on others, and as little that others should practice on me. 6.To exercise any employment or profession. A physician has practiced many years with success.

ARTIFICE –noun [Latin artificium, from ars, art, and facio, to make.] 1.Stratagem; an artful or ingenious device, in a good or bad sense. In a bad sense, it corresponds with trick, or fraud. 2.Art; trade; skill acquired by science or practice.

–=–

Title is another word for artifice. These titles of doctor, attorney, teacher, etc. are nothing but terms of art, or artifices. They are fictional creations of the syndicate, used to separate the educated from the uneducated (indoctrinated vs. un-indoctrinated). But the education institution is not a verb but a noun, signifying the false mark of the beast through degree and diploma giving legal (not lawful) permission and license from the state to act under a title, and thus to act in the name (noun) of the state.

A license has one and only one meaning – to have permission to do an otherwise illegal act.

Now you might comprehend the strange-but-true nature of science fiction elements for the scripted characters called “agents” in movies such as The Matrix and The Adjustment Bureau, the everyone-else-is-an-agent fiction of The Truman Show, and even the real life fictional agents of the syndicate; the attorney advocates called Internal Revenue Agents, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents, and so forth. Whether it be in the fiction of movies or within the fiction of law, these agents of the syndicated government always seem to show up when one of us gets out of line and somehow manages to break through the barriers set forth by the syndicate and its monopolies. If you can’t beat them, accuse them. Call them tax-avoiders or terrorists! Set them up with prostitutes or sabotage them with well-placed kiddy porn. Confine and confiscate all competition! Anything and everyone, or at least their reputation, may and must be sacrificed for the good of the syndicate. For the syndicate judges all, and the judgement is always pro-syndicate.

As portrayed in these fantasies, anyone can ultimately be an agent; an advocate undercover, acting and performing as one of the “patients” until his stage-call is exposed. All of the agents in the Truman show were of course paid employees who participated in the fraud and advocated for it because it paid them to act against their own interest and their moral objections.

The syndicate is the main employer!

The power of the purse…

It is important to note here that this syndicate was formed at the inception of the United States. And while it was not so technologically organized as it is today, the confederation and then constitution of this nation created a virtually unlimited potential for the central syndicate to grow and expand; a nest of red tape and protections from which the syndicate was berthed into America (the states). Each state of the “Union” of this confederation we call the United States was literally and by force required to confirm the fraudulent constitution of the United States central federal government in their own constitutions. States had no choice in the matter, for without confirmation of the supreme and sovereign authority of the central federal syndicate, they would not be allowed to even become states of that union. You can verify this in your own state constitution and enabling acts. For states are nothing more than acts of congress, confirmed by the president of the syndicate.

The act of confirmation is more simply defined as the conveyance of the right of estate.

CONVEY – To pass or transmit the title to property from one to another; to transfer property or the title to property by deed or instrument under seal. To convey real estate is, by an appropriate instrument, to transfer the legal title to it from the present owner to another. Convey relates properly to the disposition of real property, not to personal. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

CONVEYANCE – In pleading. Introduction or inducement. In real property law. The transfer of the title of land from one person or class of persons to another. An instrument in writing under seal, (anciently termed an “assurance,”) by which some estate or interest in lands is transferred from one person to another; such as a deed, mortgage, etc. Conveyance includes every instrument in writing by which any estate or interest in real estate is created, aliened, mortgaged, or assigned, or by which the title to any real estate may be affected in law or equity, except last wills and testaments, leases for a term not exceeding three years, and executory contracts for the sale or purchase of lands. (–Black’s 2nd Edition)

–=–

As hard as it is to admit and as painful as it may be perceived to the patriotic reader, the states had to confirm the fraud (confederation) of the central municipality of Washington D.C. as being the supreme power. No state can exist in the United States (union) without this confirmation regarding the sovereignty of the United States corporation and its constitution (debt compact). There is no right of succession within states, as the Civil war proved without doubt and as each state constitution now plainly instructs, naming states as inseparable from the union. To confirm some fictional thing like the United States is to confirm that particular fraud as the “law of the land”. While fraud is avoidable, a confirmed fraud is in turn unavoidable.

A constitution is a compact (contract) and consent to evil (fiction). The fraud becomes the government, just as the de facto United States became the federation, and thus the formation of the syndicate and its stated authority is also unavoidable as it exists only under the government’s perceived and syndicated authority. Confirmation is the action of making or turning what is unlawful and thus avoidable into a legally permissible and thus unavoidable fraud by consensual contract. The states of the union, therefore, as post-civil war corporate creations (admissions) of the union, are also mere fictional frauds, held together by nothing more than the implied consent of the inhabitants of each state – whom of course have been given a healthy dose of complete and total ignorance of these facts by the syndicate and its forced government education system, where it subjects its subjects to “history” indoctrination.

Centralized education was a requirement in the constitution of all states, not a choice.

Advocates (attorneys) do well as partners in the fraud and crime, for their whole job and lifestyle is one with a mere fictional title of limited nobility promoting the lie.

Dissenters are allowed to speak in controlled unofficial forums, providing the illusion of freedom of speech and political participation but with no actual voice (authority). An activist may never speak or present in committee or with official opinion in any seriously considered capacity. The minority always fails, while the ignorant majority lives in its own shit-pile of consequence.

E Pluribus Unum is a powerful tool and the foundational creed of the United States’ organized criminal syndicate. And so it was that the syndicate was incrementally formed and evolved over time, centralizing all power by confirming the corporate institutions and private associations that oversee all things without exception from within this wicked combination.

–=–Defining The Syndicate–=–

We must now dig further to discover that the purpose of education is not to educate, but to syndicate false information that ensures the syndicates’ ability to continue in perpetuity to be the syndication vehicle of information and regulations. In short, the syndicate exists only to perpetuate its own existence, and for no other purpose, rewarding its advocates along the way.

When something cannot be decided in committee, the syndicate may refer it to a circus parlor trick called a “conference”. A conference is simply a congress of syndicate advocates drawn together in fraud to reach a predetermined consensus.

CONFERENCE – A meeting of several persons for deliberation, for the interchange of opinion, or for the removal of differences or disputes. Thus, a meeting between a counsel and solicitor to advise on the cause of their client. In the practice of legislative bodies, when the two houses cannot agree upon a pending measure, each appoints a committee of “conference,” and the committees meet and consult together for the purpose of removing differences, harmonizing conflicting views, and arranging a compromise which will be accepted by both houses.

–=–

Here, in conference, a bunch of syndicate representatives (advocates) congregate and use word magic and trickery to “remove differences of opinion or disputes” and to advocate the “harmonizing of conflicting views” that the real public might express through non-syndicated activism – the people’s individual voices that are virtually never actually heard, and are instead worked around. Thus, through conference and via dispute resolution, an official sounding deliberation is conferred by the government regulatory bodies of the syndicate so that its profitable corporations may prosper in combinations never comprehended or commissioned by its patients – the public at large.

The voices of decent and reason are squashed in conference and committee.

E Pluribus Unum…

Some call this the forming of “consensus”. Others refer to it as the utilization of the Delphi technique. Whatever you call it, the syndicate is nothing if not the great decider.

Anciently, this same system of Delphic decisions of the gods (magistrates) were instituted by the church, which was and still is the state without separation. For legislation is simply the religious civil doctrine of the state – the acts of a 24 hour a day stage-play.

SYNOD – A meeting or assembly of ecclesiastical persons concerning religion; being the same thing, in Greek, as convocation in Latin. There are four kinds: (1) A general or universal synod or council, where bishops of all nations meet; (2) a national synod of the clergy of one nation only; (3) a provincial synod, where ecclesiastical persons of a province only assemble, being now what is called the “convocation;” (4) a diocesan synod, of those of one diocese. A synod in Scotland is composed of three or more presbyteries.

SYNODAL – A tribute or payment in money paid to the bishop or archdeacon by the inferior clergy, at the Easter visitation.

SYNODALES TESTES – Synods-men (corrupted into sidesmen) were the urban and ruraldeans, now the church-wardens.

–=–

And from these committees of the syndicate come its offspring, called the syllabus, for which the education system and its advocate “teachers” must follow as professor of that instruction. The syllabus is the end result of syllogism, which through committee and conference creates also a monopoly on logic, reason, and debate, so that the curriculum taught in schools and universities is the eventuality of the sole proprietary creation and fiction of the syndicate. The syllabus offers no freedom of thought or dissenting viewpoints, for it represents the opinion of the syndicate; of the public court.

SYLLABUS – A head-note; a note prefixed to the report of an adjudged case, containing an epitome or brief statement of the rulings of the court upon the point or points decided in the case.

SYLLOGISM – In logic. The full logical form of a single argument. It consists of three propositions, (two premises and the conclusion,) and these contain three terms, of which the two occurring in the conclusion are brought together in the premises by being referred to a common class.

SYNGRAPH – The name given by the canonists to deeds of which both parts were written on the same piece of parchment, with some word or letters of the alphabet written between them, through which the parchment was cut in such a manner as to leave half the word on one~part and half on the other. It thus corresponded to the chirograph or indenture of the common law. A deed or other written instrument under the hand and seal of all the parties.

SYNCOPARE – To cut short, or pronounce things so as not to be understood.

–=–

Ultimately, the purpose of the syndicate is a simple one, though it requires the unprecedented organization of fraud and crime that we have thus-far revealed. Quite simply, the end goal is only the acquirement of total (tacitly implied) consent. And this is easiest achieved through false consensus: an ingenious but ultimately unreal state of manufactured consent through the founding principle of E Pluribus Unum…

CONSENSUS (adj.) from 1854 as a term in physiology; 1861 of persons; from Latin consensus “agreement, accord,” past participle of consentire (see consent). There is an isolated instance of the word from 1633.

CONSENT (v.) – from early 13c. from Old French consentir (12c.) “agree, comply,” from Latin consentire “feel together,” from com- “with” (see com-) + sentire “to feel” (see sense (n.)). “Feeling together,” hence, “agreeing, giving permission,” apparently a sense evolution that took place in French before the word reached English. Related: Consented; consenting. (noun.) c.1300, “approval,” also “agreement in sentiment, harmony,” from Old French consente, from consentir (see consent (v.)). Age of consent is attested from 1809.

–=–

Black’s Law 2nd edition reveals how we in the general population are tricked into said harmonious group agreement and false consensus through the use of implied consent, as doled out by the committees, conferences, and consensus opinions of the syndicate.

CONSENT – A concurrence of wills. Express consent is that directly given, either lira voce (in voice) or in writing. Implied consent is that manifested by signs, actions, or facts, or by inaction or silence, which raise a presumption that the consent has been given. Consent in an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing as in a balance the good or evil on each side.

–=–

With the implied consent of the entire population unum, Black’s 2nd explains what are the direct implications of this uninformed (unacknowledged) consent and how this falsely formed consensus creates the implied authority of dictatorship:

IMPLIED POWERS – This term applies to theauthority that a public official has due to the nature of their duties.

IMPLIED AUTHORITY – A term given to thepower that an agent has or the authority under certain circumstances.

GENERALLY IMPLIED – Typical understanding or definition in an industry, organization, or trade of a common, customary practice, or meaning of a term.

OBLIGATION IMPLIED – This is the term given to an obligation that is inferred to be a duty due to the nature of the agreement.

IMPLIED ASSENT – Applied to the assent that is agreed tobut has not been stated expressly.

IMPLIED CONTRACT – An agreement that is agreed upon but has not been put into words.

IMPLIED AGREEMENT – One inferred from the acts or conduct of the parties, instead of being expressed by them in written or spoken words; one inferred by the law where the conduct of the parties with reference to the subject-matter is such as to induce the belief that they intended to do that which their acts indicate they have done.

–=–

In short, we have an implied government, which uses an implied consent to an implied constitution to command implied authority and implied assent to its own statutes and opinions – all because of your own implied agreement (silence) to all of these implications. Your silence and lack of action is your tacit consent. This double-speak of ways to induce a false sense of agreement and thus consensus, is all based on one very fragile concept – faith. The syndicate can only continue in perpetuity if it has the belief of the people it dominates, suggesting its permissive and consensual authority of those same subjected and dominated people, and implying that the syndicated de facto government has legitimacy. Amazingly, government admits openly that it indeed is not legitimate – that it is a de facto (illegitimate/only by force) fiction of law. This is quite verifiable on your own. And yet the voter turn out shows very well that the religion of the state and its sovereignty doctrine reigns supreme.

There’s just one little problem with that word sovereignty. And thanks to the syndicate, the “educated” masses worship its meaning incorrectly and without understanding of its ultimate implied authority…

SOVEREIGN, adjective suv’eran. [We retain this babarous orthography from the Norman sovereign. The true spelling would be suveran from the Latin supernes, superus.] 1.Supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion; as a sovereign ruler of the universe. 2.Supreme; superior to all others; chief. God is the sovereign good of all who love and obey him. 3.Supremely efficacious; superior to all others; predominant; effectual; as a sovereign remedy. 4.Supreme; pertaining to thefirst magistrate of a nation; as sovereign authority. – (noun) suv’eran. 1.A supreme lord or ruler; one who possesses the highest authority without control. Some earthly princes, kings and emperors are sovereigns in their dominions. 2.A supreme magistrate; a king. 3. A gold coin of England, value (of) $4.44 (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

MAG’ISTRATE, noun [Latin magistratus, from magister, master; magis, major, and ster, Teutonic steora, a director; steoran, to steer; the principal director.] A public civil officer, invested with the executive government or some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrateas is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like. The magistrate must have his reverence; the laws their authority. (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary)

–=–

Hmm… so our president, governors, mayors, and judges are all magistrates, which translates to masters. And all these fall under the notion of sovereignty as supreme rulers without control.

Dare we examine further the etymology of these words…?

In fact, isn’t to declare something supreme and sovereign actually to deify that thing as a god?

GOD, noun 1. The Supreme Being; Jehovah; the eternal and infinite spirit, the creator, and the sovereign of the universe. GOD is a spirit; and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth. John 4:24. 2.A false god; a heathen deity; an idol. Fear not the gods of the Amorites. Judges 6:10. 3.A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge; an angel. 4.Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good. Whose god is their belly. Philippians 3:19. GOD, verb transitiveTo deify.

–=–

Uh-oh. This isn’t looking good… it seems Webster just hit the nail painfully on the head. Whereas he defines a magistrate as a president, governor, mayor, or judge, at the same time he defines a god as a magistrate. Of course the meaning is of a false god in idol worship, honored by a completely and deliberately dumbed down population under implied god-headedness. And so thanks to the combined efforts of the syndicate, the people don’t even know they are worshiping and supporting heathen false gods as their government officials with supreme and sovereign authority over them. This alone is proof of the power of the syndicate and its system of re-education.

It was Voltaire who said, “I want my lawyer, my tailor, my servants, even my wife to believe in God, because it means that I shall be cheated and robbed and cuckolded less often. … If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.”

Well, the gods are re-invented every election cycle!

Etymologically speaking, we can see how this invention of a fictional state-god actually happened, and how it is used to make “patients” out of otherwise God-fearing men, who bend on one knee to the god that is government and its magistrates…

GOD – (n.) Old English god “supreme being, deity; the Christian God; image of a god; godlike person,” from Proto-Germanic *guthan (cognates: Old Saxon, Old Frisian, Dutch god, Old High German got, German Gott, Old Norse guð, Gothic guþ), from PIE *ghut- “that which is invoked” (cognates: Old Church Slavonic zovo “to call,” Sanskrit huta- “invoked,” an epithet of Indra), from root *gheu(e)- “to call, invoke.”

MAGISTRATE – (n.) late 14c., “civil officer in charge of administering laws,” from Old French magistrat, from Latin magistratus “a magistrate,public functionary,” originally “magisterial rank or office,” from magistrare “serve as a magistrate,” from magister “chief, director” (see master). Related: Magistracy.

MASTER – (n.) late Old English mægester “one having control or authority,” from Latin magister (n.) “chief, head, director, teacher” (source of Old French maistre, French maître, Spanish and Italian maestro, Portuguese mestre, Dutch meester, German Meister), contrastive adjective (“he who is greater“) from magis (adv.) “more,”

“Much in you is still man, and much in you is not yet man, but a shapeless pigmy that walks asleep in the mist searching for its own awakening.”

–Kahlil Gibran, “The Prophet”

–=–

It is perhaps best to reveal the origin and etymology of such words rather than utilizing dumbed-down definitions from modern dictionaries offered to the students of that very system. For ironically, education is one word they don’t teach you in school!!!

To truly understand the purpose of education, we must cross over to and temporarily attempt to empathize with the elitist dark side of the syndicate so as to view this subject through the warped disposition of our controllers and handlers. Perhaps a better question than our initial title here would be:

What kind of education would a slave-master wish to impart upon his slaves, knowing that they can be made to love and yet perceive not the nature of their enslavement?

–=–Programming The Matrix:Examining The Language Code Of The Syndicate–=–

And so we arrive back to our original question… How do you define what education really is?

Etymology, the study of the origin of words (http://etymonline.com), will best help us in our lofty endeavor:

EDUCATION (n.) – From the 1530s, “childrearing,” also “the training of animals,” from Middle French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” noun of action from past participle stem of educare (see educate). Originally of instruction in social codes and manners; meaning “systematic schooling and training forwork” is from 1610s.

–=–

Ok then… the training of animals it is. But who and what exactly do these elitist syndicate-men consider to be animals?

ANIMAL (n.) – From early 14c. (but rare before c.1600, and not in KJV, 1611), “any living creature” (including humans), from Latin animale “living being, being which breathes,” neuter of animalis “animate, living; of the air,” from anima “breath, soul; a current of air” (see animus, and compare deer). Drove out the older beast in common usage. Used of brutish humans from 1580s.

BEAST (n.) – c.1200, from Old French beste “animal, wild beast,” figuratively “fool, idiot” (11c., Modern French bête), from Vulgar Latin *besta, from Latin bestia “beast, wild animal,” of unknown origin. Used to translate Latin animal. Replaced Old English deor (see deer) as the generic word for “wild creature,” only to be ousted 16c. by animal. Of personsfelt to be animal-like in various senses from early 13c. Of the figure in the Christian apocalypse story from late 14c.

ZOON (n.) – “animal form containing all elements of a typical organism of its group,” 1864, from Greek zoion “animal” (see zoo-).

POLITICAL (adj.) – From the 1550s, “pertaining to a polity, civil affairs, or government;” from Latin politicus “of citizens or the state” (see politic (adj.)) + -al (1). Meaning “taking sides in party politics” (usually pejorative) is from 1749. Political prisoner first recorded 1860; political science is from 1779 (first attested in Hume). Political animal translates Greek politikon zoon (Aristotle, “Politics,” I.ii.9) “an animal intended to live in a city; a social animal.”

The best of students are often called the “teacher’s pet”. Is this an endearment or merely the sign of an animal with an ultra-trainable mentality?

PET – “tamed animal,” originally in Scottish and northern England dialect (and exclusively so until mid-18c.), of unknown origin. Sense of “indulged child” (c.1500) is recorded slightly earlier than that of “animal kept as a favorite” (1530s), but the latter may be the primary meaning. Probably associated with or influenced by petty . As a term of endearment by 1849. Teacher’s pet is attested from 1890.

–=–

But wait a minute! Education creates smart people does it not?

In actuality, the population is so dumbed down that it doesn’t even know the meaning of that word!

SMART – (adj.) From late Old English smeart “painful, severe, stinging; causing a sharp pain,” related to smeortan (see smart (v.)). Meaning “executed with force and vigor” is from c.1300. Meaning “quick, active, clever” is attested from c.1300, from the notion of “cutting” wit, words, etc., or else “keen in bargaining.” Meaning “trim in attire” first attested 1718, “ascending from the kitchen to the drawing-room c.1880” [Weekley]. For sense evolution, compare sharp (adj.). In reference to devices, the sense of “behaving as though guided by intelligence” (as in smart bomb) first attested 1972. Smarts “good sense, intelligence,” is first recorded 1968. Smart cookie is from 1948.

Education places more importance on dress attire and proper artful etiquette than knowledge. It’s sole purpose is to produce trained animals that have the appearance of professionalism, that in reality have no foundational legitimacy to profess anything at all.

The syndicate doesn’t just employ advocates, it absorbs them into its matrix. Admittance isn’t just acceptance, it is the creation of a new creature; the bestowing of flattering title and privilege through registration, education, and finally subscription into the establishment. One’s entire lifestyle must change to fit the world view of their chosen profession. The syndicate becomes the surrogate mother of all its conscripted advocates, whom in turn are vested in the syndicate for their very surrogate existence – totally dependent on its continuity in order to prove their own credentials. They are literally by necessity of their titles plugged-in to the matrix…

For the word matrix is not some science fiction creation. It is in reality the creation of fiction. A matrix is the birth origination of an artificial person into the syndicate.

MATRIX – From late 14c., “uterus, womb,” from Old French matrice “womb, uterus,” from Latin matrix (genitive matricis) “pregnant animal,” in Late Latin “womb,” also “source, origin,” from mater (genitive matris) “mother” (see mother (n.1)). Sense of “place or medium where something is developed” is first recorded 1550s; sense of “embedding or enclosing mass” first recorded 1640s. Logical sense of “array of possible combinations of truth-values” is attested from 1914. As a verb from 1951.

MATRIX – In civil law, the protocol or first draft of a legal instrument, from which all copies must be taken. (Downing v. Diaz, 80 Tex. 436, 16 S.W. 53.)

MATRICULATE – From the 1570s, “to admit a student to a college by enrolling his name on the register,” from Late Latin matriculatus, past participle of matriculare “to register,” from Latin matricula “public register,” diminutive of matrix (genitive matricis) “list, roll,” also “sources, womb” (see matrix).

CONSCRIPTION – From late 14c., “a putting in writing,” from Middle French conscription, from Latin conscriptionem (nominative conscriptio) “a drawing up of a list, enrollment, a levying of soldiers,” from conscribere “to enroll,” from com- “with” (see com-) + scribere “to write” (see script (n.)). Meaning “enlistment of soldiers” is from 1520s; the sense “compulsory enlistment for military service” (1800) is traceable to the French Republic act of Sept. 5, 1798. Technically, a conscription is the enrollment of a fixed number by lot, with options of providing a substitute.

TAX – c.1300, “impose a tax on,” from Old French taxer “impose a tax” (13c.) and directly from Latin taxare “evaluate, estimate, assess, handle,” also “censure, charge,” probably a frequentative form of tangere “to touch” (see tangent (adj.)). Sense of “to burden, put a strain on” first recorded early 14c.; that of “censure, reprove” is from 1560s. Its use in Luke ii for Greek apographein “to enter on a list, enroll” is due to Tyndale. Related: Taxed; taxing.

ENROLLMENT – (n.) also enrolment, mid-15c., “act of enrolling,” from Anglo-French enrollement, from Middle French enrollement, from Old French enroller “record in a register” (see enroll). Meaning “total number enrolled” is from 1859, American English.

ROLL – From early 13c., “rolled-up piece of parchment or paper” (especially one inscribed with an official record), from Old French rolle “document, parchment scroll, decree” (12c.), from Medieval Latin rotulus “a roll of paper” (source also of Spanish rollo, Italian ruollo), from Latin rotula “small wheel,” diminutive of rota “wheel” (see rotary). Meaning “a register, list, catalogue” is from late 14c., common from c.1800…

REGISTER (v1)- late 14c. (transitive), “enter in a listing,” from Old French registrer “note down, include” (13c.) and directly from Medieval Latin registrare, from registrum (see register (n.)). Intransitive sense, of instruments, from 1797; of persons and feelings, “make an impression,” from 1901. Meaning “to enter one’s name in a list” for some purpose is from 1940. Related: Registered; registering. Registered nurse attested from 1879.

CATALOGUE – (n) from the early 15c., from Old French catalogue “list, index” (14c.), and directly from Late Latin catalogus, from Greek katalogos “a list, register, enrollment” (such as the katalogos neon, the “catalogue of ships” in the “Iliad”), from kata “down; completely” (see cata-) + legein “to say, count” (see lecture (n.)).

SIGNATURE – (n.) 1530s, a kind of document in Scottish law, from Middle French signature (16c.) or directly from Medieval Latin signatura “signature, a rescript,” in classical Latin “the matrix of a seal,” from signatus, past participle of signare “to mark with a stamp, sign” (see sign (v.)). Meaning “one’s own name written in one’s own hand” is from 1570s, replacing sign-manual (early 15c.) in this sense… Meaning “a distinguishing mark of any kind” is from 1620s.

ESTABLISHMENT – From the late 15c., “settled arrangement,” also “income, property,” from establish + -ment. Meaning “established church” is from 1731; Sense of “place of business” is from 1832. Meaning “social matrix of ruling people and institutions” is attested occasionally from 1923, consistently from 1955. The connection of senses in the Latin word seems to be via confusion of Greek metra “womb” (from meter “mother;” see mother (n.1)) and an identical but different Greek word metra meaning “register, lot” (see meter (n.2)). Evidently Latin matrix was used to translate both, though it originally shared meaning with only one. Related: Matriculated; matriculating.

–=–

Of course we must train our young to be patriotic, thus defending the slave-master’s territory as if it were our own, preserving continuity of the syndicate that makes us all its unwitting patients. And so the education system has institutionalized and instilled in its patients (students), as animals, a strict territorial protectionism. Each school day begins with the saying of an enchantment pledge to the sovereign god of government via its symbol of authority, the United States war flag. I pledge allegiance, to the flag…

TERRITORIAL (adj.) – From the 1620s, “of or pertaining to a territory,” from Late Latin territorialis, from territorium (see territory). In reference to British regiments, from 1881. In reference to an area defended by an animal, from 1920. Territorial waters is from 1841. Territorial army “British home defense” is from 1908. Territorial imperative “animal need to claim and defend territory“ is from 1966.

–=–

Territory and jurisdiction go hand in hand. A flattering title in the matrix of the syndicate only exists in that fictional jurisdiction, not in reality. Therefore the territorial imperative must be instilled into each generation in order to legitimize the syndicate. The birth certificate is the matrix, the initial legal document, which creates the bond and surety of the surname to the given name. Only upon that legal surname can the syndicate bestow titles and credentials – upon the artificial person (name).

Perhaps we are all victims here? Perhaps we have all received the mental mark of the government beast without contemplation, enchanted by our very own pledge of allegiance to a complete fiction. Perhaps this represents our being branded like cattle, as chattel within invisible paper borders educated to love our servitude and to hate true freedom…

MARK (n.) – “Trace, impression,” Old English mearc (West Saxon), merc (Mercian) “boundary, sign, limit, mark,” from Proto-Germanic *marko (cognates: Old Norse merki “boundary, sign,” mörk “forest,” which often marked a frontier; Old Frisian merke, Gothic marka “boundary, frontier,” Dutch merk “mark, brand,” German Mark “boundary, boundary land”), from PIE *merg- “edge, boundary, border” (cognates: Latin margo “margin;” Avestan mareza- “border,” Old Irish mruig, Irish bruig “borderland,” Welsh bro “district“). The primary sense is probably “boundary,” which had evolved by Old English through “sign of a boundary,” through “sign in general,” then to “impression or trace forming a sign.” Meaning “any visible trace or impression” first recorded c.1200. Sense of “line drawn to indicate starting point of a race” (as in on your marks …) first attested 1887. The Middle English sense of “target” (c.1200) is the notion in marksman and slang sense “victim of a swindle” (1883). The notion of “sign, token” is behind the meaning “numerical award given by a teacher” (1829). Influenced by Scandinavian cognates.

VICTIM (n.) – Late 15c., “living creature killed and offered as a sacrifice to a deity or supernatural power,” from Latin victima “person or animal killed as a sacrifice.” Perhaps distantly connected to Old English wig “idol,” Gothic weihs “holy,” German weihen “consecrate” (compare Weihnachten “Christmas”) on notion of “a consecrated animal.” Sense of “person who is hurt, tortured, or killed by another” is recorded from 1650s; meaning “person oppressed by some power or situation” is from 1718. Weaker sense of “person taken advantage of” is recorded from 1781.

–=–

And just where is it that we are collectively taken advantage of, receiving the mark of work training to ensure our future labor capacity to be used in commercial activities as employees of the human trafficking (commerce) syndicate?

SCHOOL (n.) – “Place of instruction,” Old English scol, from Latin schola “intermission of work, leisure for learning; learned conversation, debate; lecture; meeting place for teachers and students, place of instruction; disciples of a teacher, body of followers, sect,” from Greek skhole “spare time, leisure, rest ease; idleness; that in which leisure is employed; learned discussion;” also “a place for lectures, school;” originally “a holding back, a keeping clear,” from skhein “to get” (from PIE root *segh- “to hold, hold in one’s power, to have;” see scheme (n.)) + -ole by analogy with bole “a throw,” stole “outfit,” etc. The original notion is “leisure,” which passed to “otiose discussion” (in Athens or Rome the favorite or proper use for free time), then “place for such discussion.” The Latin word was widely borrowed (Old French escole, French école, Spanish escuela, Italian scuola, Old High German scuola, German Schule, Swedish skola, Gaelic sgiol, Welsh ysgol, Russian shkola). Translated in Old English as larhus, literally “lore house,” but this seems to have been a glossary word only. Meaning “students attending a school” in English is attested from c.1300; sense of “school building” is first recorded 1590s. Sense of “people united by a general similarity of principles and methods” is from 1610s; hence school of thought (1864). School of hard knocks “rough experience in life” is recorded from 1912 (in George Ade); totell tales out of school “betray damaging secrets” is from 1540s. School bus is from 1908. School days is from 1590s. School board from 1870.

To put this into terms of common understanding, schools now teach students how to learn to be a part of the end result of the scheme of education, how to be good little victims and patients, how to fit into the syndicate, and how to bear (carry) the mark and impression of unwarranted authority and oppression (a degree of crime) over apparently less “educated” persons. For an official education is not knowledge, merely learned behavior. By learning to believe in the territorial imperative – as trained animals – the pedagogical sophist (graduate with a degree) then intellectually feels the need to claim and defend the territorial scheme as a forceful government jurisdiction. For without a territory that recognizes the degree of crime (diploma) bestowed upon his or her name, the sophist would never succeed in his selfish claim of master and graduate, nor have title and status over others. The graduate is thus an automatic advocate of the syndicate. For without the authority of the University institution, his or her credentials (diploma) would be worthless.

–=–Degrees Of Crime–=–

The average ego-centric person is very proud of their little piece of parchment that states the degree to which they have been “educated”. The conceptual actualization of the credentialist model through education allows for a criminal syndicate based on mere export of specifically trained animals, where the worst crimes against humanity are imagined and perpetrated. This ranking system of schools and universities when brought into the light reveals origins much more imaginative than the best science fictions available. Basing its ladder of approval and license via the issuance of a state-sanctioned diploma, the true nature of this system boils down to mere monopolistic syndicalism.

To comprehend what the education system truly represents, we must first discover where these words originated and how they describe just what an “educated” man is. Receiving your high school, college, and university diploma has been engrained into our societal norm as one of the great achievements of a young person’s life. But what is the etymology of that word?

It is interesting to note that the etymology of the word degree, referring to the movement or position of some thing in relation to its master:

In reality, a earn a degree is to “degrade”, which is why you receive grades (a degree of measurement) on your efforts, becoming legally limited and bound by the syndicate. Acceptance of artifice and title is the acceptance of one’s place diminished within the syndicate as a lesser subject – a cog in the wheel. This is not an honor, for the giver of that honer is not lawful or honorable, and in fact is literally criminal (confederation) in nature. The syndicate can only lower one’s standing, never raise it. For standing is mere legalese, and title requires subjection to the rules and regulations of the syndicate through the use of the surname, which again is an artificial person and property of government. In exchange for the extinguishing or free thought by students and laborers, the syndicate dispenses degrees, which represents one’s relationship and status within the syndicate, and rewards the silent with money and benefits. For the diploma and degree are of the state, not the school. This, again, is voluntary slavery. And the benefits for volunteers are quite enticing…

You could say that an education degree is a way of measuring the criminal degree of a person, in the form of his or her status assigned by the criminal syndicate government.

The word “graduation” in essence refers to temperature, as in refining or tempering the mind like crude oil and like a trained dog:

GRADUATION – From early 15c., in alchemy, “tempering, refining of something to a certain degree; measurement according to the four degrees of a quality,” from graduate (n.). General sense of “dividing into degrees” is from 1590s; meaning “action of receiving or giving an academic degree” is from early 15c.; in reference to the ceremony where a degree is given, from 1818.

GRADUATE – From early 15c., “one who holds a degree” (with man; as a stand-alone noun from mid-15c.), from Medieval Latin graduatus, past participle of graduari “to take a degree,” from Latin gradus “step, grade” (see grade (n.)). As an adjective, from late 15c.

GRADE (n.) – From the 1510s, “degree of measurement,” from French grade “grade, degree” (16c.), from Latin gradus “step, pace, gait, walk;” figuratively “a step, stage, degree,” related to gradi “to walk, step, go,” from PIE *ghredh- (cognates: Lithuanian gridiju “to go, wander,” Old Church Slavonic gredo “to come,” Old Irish in-greinn “he pursues,” and second element in congress, progress, etc.). Replaced Middle English gree “step, degree in a series,” from Old French grei “step,” from Latin gradus. Railway sense is from 1811. Meaning “class of things having the same quality or value” is from 1807; meaning “division of a school curriculum equivalent to one year” is from 1835; that of “letter-mark indicating assessment of a student’s work” is from 1886 (earlier used of numerical grades). Grade A “top quality, fit for human consumption” (originally of milk) is from a U.S. system instituted in 1912.

–=–

And of course to temper something is to assign a temperature (degree) to it:

TEMPERATURE (n.) mid-15c., “fact of being tempered, proper proportion;” 1530s, “character or nature of a substance,” from Latin temperatura “a tempering, moderation,” from temperatus, past participle of temperare “to be moderate; to mingle in due proportion” (see temper (v.))

DIPLOMACY (n.) – From 1796, from French diplomatie, formed from diplomate “diplomat” (on model of aristocratie from aristocrate), from Latin adjective diplomaticos, from diploma (genitive diplomatis) “official document conferring a privilege“ (see diploma; for sense evolution, see diplomatic).

DIPLOMATIC (adj.) – From 1711, “pertaining to documents, texts, charters,” from Medieval Latin diplomaticus, from diplomat-, stem of diploma (see diploma). Meaning “pertaining to international relations” is recorded from 1787, apparently a sense evolved in 18c. from the use of diplomaticus in Modern Latin titles of collections of international treaties, etc., in which the word referred to the “texts” but came to be felt as meaning “pertaining to international relations.” In the general sense of “tactful and adroit,” it dates from 1826. Related: Diplomatically.

REPORT (n.) – From late 14c., “an account brought by one person to another, rumor,” from Old French report “pronouncement,judgment” (Modern French rapport), from reporter “to tell, relate” (see report (v.)). Meaning “resounding noise, sound of an explosion” is from 1580s. Meaning “formal statement of results of an investigation” first attested 1660s; sense of “teacher’s official statement of a pupil’s work and behavior” is from 1873 (report card in the school sense first attested 1919).

–=–

A diploma is then really nothing more and nothing less than the conferment of State privilege and license, so that one may be judged officially as tame and trainable enough to join the syndicate monopoly within its institutions. The candidate must be employable (able to be used as a commodity) within the various government regulated industries, and must be entrusted with its secrets, not the least of which is its own fraudulent nature.

I wonder where the word “university” came from?

UNIVERS’ITY – nounAn assemblage of colleges established in any place, with professors for instructing students in the sciences and other branches of learning, and where degrees are conferred. A university is properly a universal school, in which are taught all branches of learning, or the four faculties of theology, medicine, law and the sciences and arts. (–Webster’s 1828)

UNIVERSITAS – Latin. In the civil law. A corporation aggregate. Literally, a whole formed out of many individuals. (–Black’s 1st)

UNIVERSUS – Latin. The whole; all together. (–Black’s 1st)

UNIVERSAL AGENT – One who if appointed to do all the acts which the principal can personally do, and which he may lawfully delegate the power to another to do. (–Black’s 1st)

The only competition between Universities is with their sports teams. The teaching of misinformation and doctrine is universal throughout. For teachers and professors are advocates too, whose credentials demand conformity to syllabus and syndicalism.

A diploma really represents a permission bestowed by the syndicate through universal (university) control of information that one may be of a certain vocation. This is no different than a priest telling you that you have a calling. It is the very definition of syndicalist education: work training.

CALL (v.) – Sanskrit garhati meaning to “bewail, criticize;” and from Old High German klaga, German Klage“complaint, grievance, lament, accusation;” etc… From 13th Century call meaning “to give a name to.”

GUARANTEE (n.) – From the 1670s, altered (perhaps via Spanish garante), from earlier garrant“warrant that the title to a property is true,” early 15c., from Old French garant “defender, protector,” from Germanic (see warrant (n.)). For form evolution, see gu-. Originally “person giving something as security;” sense of the “pledge” itself (which is properly a guaranty) developed 17c.

WARRANT (v.) – From late 13th Century “to keep safe from danger,” from Old North French warantir“safeguard, protect; guarantee, pledge” (Old French garantir), from warant(see warrant (n.)). Meaning “to guarantee to be of quality” is attested from late 14c.; sense of “to guaranteeas true” is recorded from c.1300. Related: Warranted; warranting; warrantable.

SURETY (n.) – c.1300, “a guarantee, promise, pledge, an assurance,” from Old French seurté “a promise, pledge, guarantee; assurance, confidence” (12c., Modern French sûreté), from Latin securitatem (nominative securitas) “freedom from care or danger, safety,security,” from securus (see secure (adj.)). From late 14c. as “security, safety, stability; state of peace,” also “certainty, certitude; confidence.” Meaning “one who makes himself responsible for another” is from early 15c. Until 1966, the French national criminal police department was the Sûreté nationale.

PLEDGE (n.) – From mid-14c., “surety, bail,” from Old French plege (Modern French pleige) “hostage, security, bail,” probably from Frankish *plegan “to guarantee,” from *pleg-, a West Germanic root meaning “have responsibility for” (cognates: Old Saxon plegan “vouch for,” Middle Dutch plien “to answer for, guarantee,” Old High German pflegan “to care for, be accustomed to,” Old English pleon “to risk the loss of, expose to danger;” see plight (v.)). Meaning “allegiance vow attested by drinking with another” is from 1630s. Sense of “solemn promise” first recorded 1814, though this notion is from 16c. in the verb. Weekley notes the “curious contradiction” in pledge (v.) “to toast with a drink” (1540s) and pledge (n.) “the vow to abstain from drinking” (1833). Meaning “student who has agreed to join a fraternity or sorority” dates from 1901.

–=–

Advocates are heavily protected by the syndicate so that they may act in its interest, under its name, no matter how unlawful (yet legalized by the syndicate against the law) those actions may be. Doctors, for instance, must take extreme amounts of liability and malpractice insurance in order to protect their “practice.” The normalcy of this fact is quite frightening, as the common folk never seem to grasp that a Doctor’s whole “practice” is fraud in the first place. Every action, in other words, by a doctor is indeed malpractice and done so under a pseudonym protected by the syndicate.

This shirking of personal responsibility is key to the atrocities taking place within these institutions. Representing massive combinations of syndicalists, monopolies and trusts rule the day.

Do you have the right to work in the syndicate? Only if you can show permission from the animal training university center you attended and if your name is marked with a degree of crime. You must be confirmed into the syndicate due to your corroboration and willingness to commit legalized crime (crime by permission of the state). For you are thus forbidden to enter a specialty field while having your own opinions…

CREDENTIAL (n.) “that which entitles to credit,” 1756, probably a back-formation from credentials. Earlier in English as an adjective, “confirming, corroborating” (late 15c.). As a verb, “provide with credentials,” by 1828 (implied in dredentialed).

CREDENTIALS (n.) “letters entitling the bearer to certain credit or confidence,” 1670s, from Medieval Latin credentialis, from credentia (see credence). Probably immediately as a shortening of letters credential (1520s, with French word order); earlier was letter of credence (mid-14c.).

CREDIT (n.) – From the 1520s, from Middle French crédit (15c.) “belief,trust,” from Italian credito, from Latin creditum “a loan, thing entrusted to another,” from past participle of credere “to trust, entrust, believe” (see credo). The commercial sense was the original one in English (creditor is mid-15c.). Meaning “honor, acknowledgment of merit,” is from c.1600. Academic sense of “point for completing a course of study” is 1904. Movie/broadcasting sense is 1914. Credit rating is from 1958; credit union is 1881, American English.

CONFIDENCE – (n.) From early 15c., from Middle French confidence or directly from Latin confidentia, from confidentem (nominative confidens) “firmly trusting, bold,” present participle of confidere “to have full trust or reliance,” from com–, intensive prefix (see com-), + fidere “to trust” (see faith). For sense of “swindle” see con(adj.).

CON – (adj.) “swindling,” 1889, American English, from confidence man (1849), from the many scams in which the victim is induced to hand over money as a token of confidence. Confidence with a sense of “assurance based on insufficient grounds” dates from 1590s.

DREAD (v.) – late 12c., a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædan “counsel or advise against,” also “to dread, fear, be afraid,” from on- “against” + rædan “to advise” (see read (v.)). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading. As a noun from 12c.

MASTER’S DEGREE (n.) From late 14c., originally a degree giving one authority to teach in a university; from master (n.) in its general sense of “man of learning” (early 13c.), “a teacher” (c.1200).

MASTER (n.) – From late Old English mægester “one having control or authority,” from Latin magister (n.) “chief, head, director, teacher” (source of Old French maistre, French maître, Spanish and Italian maestro, Portuguese mestre, Dutch meester, German Meister), contrastive adjective (“he who is greater“) from magis (adv.) “more,” from PIE *mag-yos-, comparative of root *meg- “great” (see mickle). Form influenced in Middle English by Old French cognate maistre. Meaning “original of a recording” is from 1904. In academic senses (from Medieval Latin magister) it is attested from late 14c., originally a degree conveying authority to teach in the universities. As an adjective from late 12c.

DOCTRINE (n.) – From late 14c., from Old French doctrine (12c.) “teaching, doctrine,” and directly from Latin doctrina “teaching, body of teachings, learning,” from doctor “teacher” (see doctor (n.)).

DOCTOR (n.) – c.1300, “Church father,” from Old French doctour, from Medieval Latin doctor “religious teacher, adviser, scholar,” in classical Latin “teacher,” agent noun from docere “to show, teach, cause to know,” originally “make to appear right,” causative of decere “be seemly, fitting” (see decent). Meaning “holder of highest degree in university” is first found late 14c.; as is that of “medical professional” (replacing native leech (n.2)), though this was not common till late 16c. The transitional stage is exemplified in Chaucer’s Doctor of phesike (Latin physica came to be used extensively in Medieval Latin for medicina). Similar usage of the equivalent of doctor is colloquial in most European languages: Italian dottore, French docteur, German doktor, Lithuanian daktaras, though these are typically not the main word in those languages for a medical healer. For similar evolution, see Sanskrit vaidya- “medical doctor,” literally “one versed in science.” German Arzt, Dutch arts are from Late Latin archiater, from Greek arkhiatros “chief healer,” hence “court physician.” French médecin is a back-formation from médicine, replacing Old French miege, from Latin medicus.

LEECH (n.1) – “bloodsucking aquatic worm,” from Old English læce (Kentish lyce), of unknown origin (with a cognate in Middle Dutch lake). Commonly regarded as a transferred use of leech (n.2), but the Old English forms suggest a distinct word, which has been assimilated to leech (n.2) by folk etymology [see OED]. Figuratively applied to human parasites since 1784.

LEECH (n.2) – obsolete for “physician,” from Old English læce, probably from Old Danish læke, from Proto-Germanic *lekjaz “enchanter, one who speaks magic words; healer, physician” (cognates: Old Frisian letza, Old Saxon laki, Old Norse læknir, Old High German lahhi, Gothic lekeis “physician”), literally “one who counsels,” perhaps connected with a root found in Celtic (compare Irish liaig “charmer, exorcist, physician“) and Slavic (compare Serbo-Croatian lijekar, Polish lekarz), from PIE *lep-agi “conjurer,” from root *leg- “to collect,” with derivatives meaning “to speak” (see lecture (n.)). For sense development, compare Old Church Slavonic baliji “doctor,” originally “conjurer,” related to Serbo-Croatian bajati “enchant, conjure;” Old Church Slavonic vrači, Russian vrač “doctor,” related to Serbo-Croatian vrač “sorcerer, fortune-teller.” The form merged with leech (n.1) in Middle English, apparently by folk etymology. In 17c., leech usually was applied only to veterinary practitioners. The fourth finger of the hand, in Old English, was læcfinger, translating Latin digitus medicus, Greek daktylus iatrikos, supposedly because a vein from that finger stretches straight to the heart.

BACCALAUREATE (n.) – 1620s, “university degree of a bachelor,” from Modern Latin baccalaureatus, from baccalaureus “student with the first degree,” alteration of Medieval Latin baccalarius “one who has attainedthe lowest degree in a university, advanced student lecturing under his master’s supervision but not yet having personal license” (altered by folk etymology or word-play, as if from bacca lauri “laurel berry,” laurels being awarded for academic success).

SOPHOMORE (n.) – 1680s, “student in the second year of university study,” literally “arguer,” altered from sophumer (1650s, from sophume, archaic variant form of sophism), probably by influence of folk etymology derivation from Greek sophos “wise” + moros “foolish, dull” (a wise fool). The original reference might be to the dialectic exercises that formed a large part of education in the middle years. At Oxford and Cambridge, asophister (from sophist with spurious-er as in philosopher) was a second- or third-year student (what Americans would call a “junior” might be a senior sophister).

SOPHISTRY (n.) “specious but fallacious reasoning,” mid-14c., from Old French sophistrie (Modern French sophisterie), from Medieval Latin sophistria, from Latin sophista, sophistes (see sophist). “Sophistry applies to reasoning as sophism to a single argument” [Century Dictionary].

MONITOR (n.) – 1540s, “senior pupil at a school charged with keeping order, etc.,” from Latin monitor “one who reminds, admonishes, or checks,” also “an overseer, instructor, guide, teacher,” agent noun from monere “to admonish, warn, advise,” related to memini “I remember, I am mindful of,” and to mens “mind,” from PIE root *men- “to think” (see mind (n.)). The type of lizard so called because it is supposed to give warning of crocodiles (1826). Meaning “squat, slow-moving type of ironclad warship” (1862) so called from name of the first vessel of this design, chosen by the inventor, Swedish-born U.S. engineer John Ericsson (1803-1889), because it was meant to “admonish” the Confederate leaders in the U.S. Civil War. Broadcasting sense of “a device to continuously check on the technical quality of a transmission” (1931) led to special sense of “a TV screen displaying the picture from a particular camera.”

TEACHER (n.) – “one who teaches,” c.1300; agent noun from teach (v.). It was used earlier in a sense of “index finger” (late 13c.). Teacher’s pet attested from 1856.

PEDAGOGUE (n.) – From late 14c., “schoolmaster, teacher,” from Old French pedagoge “teacher of children” (14c.), from Latin paedagogus, from Greek paidagogos “slave who escorts boys to school and generally supervises them,” later “a teacher,” from pais (genitive paidos) “child” (see pedo-) + agogos “leader,” from agein “to lead” (see act (n.)). Hostile implications in the word are at least from the time of Pepys (1650s). Related: Pedagogal.

PEDAGOGIC (adj.) – From 1781, from Latin paedagogicus, from Greek paidagogikos “suitable for a teacher,” from paidagogos “teacher” (see pedagogue).

MISTRESS (n.) – early 14c., “female teacher, governess,” from Old French maistresse “mistress (lover); housekeeper; governess, female teacher” (Modern French maîtresse), fem. of maistre “master” (see master (n.)). Sense of “a woman who employs others or has authority over servants” is from early 15c. Sense of “kept woman of a married man” is from early 15c.

PROFESSOR (n.) – From late 14c., “one who teaches a branch of knowledge,” from Old French professeur (14c.) and directly from Latin professor “person who professes to be an expert in some art or science; teacher of highest rank,” agent noun from profiteri “lay claim to, declare openly” (see profess). As a title prefixed to a name, it dates from 1706. Short form prof is recorded from 1838. Professor:One professing religion. This canting use of the word comes down from the Elizabethan period, but is obsolete in England. [Thornton, “American Glossary,” 1912]

GOVERNESS (n.) – mid-15c., “female ruler,” shortening of governouresse “a woman who rules” (late 14c.), from Old French governeresse “female ruler or administrator” (see governor + -ess); in the sense of “a female teacher in a private home” it is attested from 1712.

Stories of witchcraft and magic (magi-c) may be grandiose and over the top in the fiction and fantasy of syndicated media, but their practical application towards the education system can be readily defined within the etymology of words. Witches and warlocks cast spells. They do so with incantations of words and through the use of mythical symbols. For the spell to work the student must be taught spelling, and be graded in such art. But the education system never reveals to its students and descended “masters” of learning degrees just what spelling truly represents, for the student becomes the object of the spelled out words of approved textbooks, thus leaving an “educated” person under the spell of the syndicate. So let’s examine the origin of the spell, both in the spoken and in the written word:

SPELL (v.) – early 14c., “read letter by letter, write or say the letters of;” c.1400, “form words by means of letters,” apparently a French word that merged with or displaced a native Old English one; both are from the same Germanic root, but the French word had evolved a different sense. The native word is Old English spellian “to tell, speak, discourse, talk,” from Proto-Germanic *spellam (cognates: Old High German spellon “to tell,” Old Norse spjalla, Gothic spillon “to talk, tell“), from PIE *spel- (2) “to say aloud, recite.” But the current senses seem to come from Anglo-French espeller, Old French espelir “mean, signify, explain, interpret,” also “spell out letters, pronounce, recite,” from Frankish *spellon “to tell” or some other Germanic source, ultimately identical with the native word. Related: Spelled; spelling. In early Middle English still “to speak, preach, talk, tell,” hence such expressions as hear spell “hear (something) told or talked about,” spell the wind “talk in vain” (both 15c.). Meaning “form words with proper letters” is from 1580s. Spell out “explain step-by-step“ is first recorded 1940, American English. Shakespeare hasspell (someone) backwards “reverse the character of, explain in a contrary sense, portray with determined negativity.”

–=–

“No one will enter the New World Order
unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer.
No one will enter the New Age
unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation.”

–David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

–=–

Thus the legal language as a “term of art” could certainly be said to be a magic spell, a spell foisted upon the common people by using the common (vulgar) vernacular spelling of word,s which in fact are defined quite opposite of the character of that common language. Other spells as art-form languages include the medical and biological spelling as well as that of other educated magi-cians, each with their own terms of art. In other words, each institution of the syndicate has its own language (terms of art), and so each animal that ascends through the education system is destined to be caught up in the paradigm of his chosen profession, never to understand the many other professions offered, each with their own use of “spelling”. In this way, the trained (educated) animals are kept institutionalized within their own chosen professions. They profess the language of their own dialectic, separated devisively by all others through the use of language as terms of art.

And through this word magic that is cast as a spell upon the education of students, the belief in the spell creates credentialed men of degree and diploma, who will each defend their education and the titled status it creates and vests upon their person literally to the death and detriment of their fellow species. For they are spellbound by the spells of spelling and the prestige they believe (be-LIE-ve) it creates…

SPELLBOUND (adj.) – “to be bound by or as if by a spell,” 1742, from spell (n.1) + bound (adj.1) “fastened,” past participle of bind (v.).

SPELLING (n.) – From mid-15c., “action of reading letter by letter,” verbal noun from spell (v.1). Meaning “manner of forming words with letters” is from 1660s; meaning “a way a word has been spelled” is from 1731. Spelling bee is from 1878 (see bee; earlier spelling match, 1845; the act of winning such a schoolroom contest is described 1854 as to spell (someone) down).

SPELLER (n.) – c.1200, “a preacher;” mid-15c. apparently in the sense “a person who reads letter by letter;” 1864 of a book to teach orthography. Agent noun from spell (v.1).

SPELL (n.) – Old English spell “story, saying, tale, history, narrative, fable; discourse, command,” from Proto-Germanic *spellam (see spell (v.1)). Compare Old Saxon spel, Old Norse spjall, Old High German spel, Gothic spill “report, discourse, tale, fable, myth;” German Beispiel “example.” From c.1200 as “an utterance, something said, a statement, remark;” meaning “set of words with supposed magical or occult powers, incantation, charm” first recorded 1570s; hence any means or cause of enchantment. The term ‘spell’ is generally used for magical procedures which cause harm, or force people to do something against their will — unlike charms for healing, protection, etc. [“Oxford Dictionary of English Folklore”] – Also in Old English, “doctrine; a sermon; religious instruction or teaching; the gospel; a book of the Bible;” compare gospel. – (n.2) – 1620s, “a turn of work in place of another,” from spell (v.2); compare Old English gespelia “a substitute.” Meaning shifted toward “continuous course of work” (1706), probably via notion of shift work (as at sea) where one man or crew regularly “spelled” another. Hence “continuous stretch” of something (weather, etc.), recorded by 1728. Hence also, via the notion in give a spell (1750) “relieve another by taking a turn of work” came the sense “interval of rest or relaxation” (1845), which took the word to a sense opposite what it had at the start.

SPELLBIND (v.) – “to bind by or as if by spell,” 1808, probably a back-formation from spellbound. Related: Spellbinding; spellbinder.

SPELL (v.2) – “work in place of (another),” 1590s, earlier spele, from Old English spelian “to take the place of, be substitute for, represent,” related to gespelia “substitute,” of uncertain origin. Perhaps related to spilian “to play” (see spiel). Related: Spelled; spelling.

SENTENCE (n.) – c.1200, “doctrine, authoritative teaching; an authoritative pronouncement,” from Old French sentence “judgment, decision; meaning; aphorism, maxim; statement of authority” (12c.) and directly from Latin sententia “thought, way of thinking, opinion; judgment, decision,” also “a thought expressed; aphorism, saying,” from sentientem, present participle of sentire “be of opinion, feel, perceive” (see sense (n.)). Loss of first -i- in Latin by dissimilation. From early 14c. as “judgment rendered by God, or by one in authority; a verdict, decision in court;” from late 14c. as “understanding, wisdom; edifying subject matter.” From late 14c. as “subject matter or content of a letter, book, speech, etc.,” also in reference to a passage in a written work. Sense of “grammatically complete statement” is attested from mid-15c. “Meaning,” then “meaning expressed in words.” Related: Sentential.

–=–

“All the world’s indeed a stage
And we are merely players,
Conformers and portrayer’s;
Each another’s audience
Outside the guided cage.”

–Rush, lyrics to “Limelight”

–=–

Acceptance of accreditation (a-credit/title-bestowed by the State) by the Magistrates (gods) of government through its education syndicate is indeed the representation of man as player upon the stage. And when the spell is cast and recognition realized, the morals and ethics of natural man fall to the side of what the syndicate gives license for as the re-presentation of man as a doctor, lawyer, professional, and so-called “master”. Presto! With an imaginary corporate costume change the man becomes an agent of government controlled by the syndicate through the “degree of crime” diploma bestowed. His or her actions become those of an enchanted puppet, doing the bidding of those who pull his or her fictional strings and pay pensions, while the illusion of living in the limelight corrupts and defects. And through this re-presentation of man as a spellbound victim of the degree scheme, the most unconscionable accomplishments against man and nature can be accomplished under the doctrine of the syndicate’s occult and magical spell.

ENCHANTMENT (n.) – c.1300, “act of magic or witchcraft; use of magic; magic power,” from Old French encantement “magical spell; song, concert, chorus,” from enchanter “bewitch, charm,” from Latin incantare “enchant, cast a (magic) spell upon,” from in- “upon, into” (see in- (2)) + cantare “to sing” (see chant (v.)). Figurative sense of “allurement” is from 1670s. Compare Old English galdor “song,” also “spell, enchantment,” from galan “to sing,” which also is the source of the second element in nightingale.

FASCINATE (v.) – 1590s, “bewitch, enchant,” from Middle French fasciner (14c.), from Latin fascinatus, past participle of fascinare “bewitch, enchant, fascinate,” from fascinus “spell, witchcraft,” of uncertain origin. Possibly from Greek baskanos “bewitcher, sorcerer,” with form influenced by Latin fari “speak” (see fame (n.)). To fascinate is to bring under a spell, as by the power of the eye; to enchant and to charm are to bring under a spell by some more subtle and mysterious power. [Century Dictionary]. The Greek word might be from a Thracian equivalent of Greek phaskein “to say;” compare also enchant, and German besprechen “to charm,” from sprechen “to speak.” Earliest used of witches and of serpents, who were said to be able to cast a spell by a look that rendered one unable to move or resist. Sense of “delight, attract” is first recorded 1815. Related: Fascinated; fascinating.

MANTRA (n.) – 1808, “that part of the Vedas which contains hymns,” from Sanskrit mantras “sacred message or text, charm, spell, counsel,” literally “instrument of thought,” related to manyate “thinks,” from PIE root *men- “to think” (see mind (n.)). Sense of “special word used for meditation” is first recorded in English 1956.

CONJURE (v.) – late 13c., “command on oath,” from Old French conjurer“invoke, conjure” (12c.), from Latin coniurare “to swear together; conspire,” from com- “together” (see com-) + iurare “to swear” (see jury (n.)). Magical sense is c.1300, for “constraining by spell” a demon to do one’s bidding. Related: Conjured; conjuring. Phrase conjure up “cause to appear in the mind” (as if by magic) attested from 1580s.

CHARM (v.) – c.1300, “to recite or cast a magic spell,” from Old French charmer (13c.) “to enchant, to fill (someone) with desire (for something); to protect, cure, treat; to maltreat, harm,” from Late Latin carminare, from Latin carmen (see charm (n.)). In Old French used alike of magical and non-magical activity. In English, “to win over by treating pleasingly, delight” from mid-15c. Related: Charmed; charming. Charmed (short for I am charmed) as a conventional reply to a greeting or meeting is attested by 1825.

–=–

“I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of the United States of America…” is one quite familiar enchantment perpetrated upon youngsters in all grades of education, creating the religiously patriotic doctrine of unthinking yet unwavering support of said state and nation – a necessity for the syndication of education and its design of pedagogy. This pledge (oath) is even invoked as a spell in the name of God, which fascinates even the most staunch of self-proclaimed atheists. The language of education is the lore of the syndicate, harvesting and training young minds into a delightfully rendered incapacity to think and feel anything that would disrupt the spelled-out doctrine of the syndicate.

FOLKLORE (n.) – From 1846, coined by antiquarian William J. Thoms (1803-1885) as an Anglo-Saxonism (replacing popular antiquities) and first published in the “Athenaeum” of Aug. 22, 1846, from folk + lore. Old English folclar meant “homily.” This word revived folk in a modern sense of “of the common people, whose culture is handed down orally,” and opened up a flood of compound formations, as in folk art (1892), folk-hero (1874), folk-medicine (1877), folk-tale/folk tale (1850; Old English folctalu meant “genealogy“), folk-song (1847), folk singer (1876), folk-dance (1877).

MYTHOLOGICAL (adj.) – From the 1610s, from Late Latin mythologicus, from Greek mythologikos “versed in legendary lore,” from mythologia (see mythology). Related: Mythologically.

MYTH (n.) – In 1830, from French Mythe (1818) and directly from Modern Latin mythus, from Greek mythos “speech, thought, story, myth, anything delivered by word of mouth,” of unknown origin. Myths are “stories about divine beings,generally arranged in a coherent system; they are revered as true and sacred; they are endorsed by rulers and priests; and closely linked to religion. Once this link is broken, and the actors in the story are not regarded as gods but as human heroes, giants or fairies, it is no longer a myth but a folktale. Where the central actor is divine but the story is trivial … the result is religious legend, not myth.” [J. Simpson & S. Roud, “Dictionary of English Folklore,” Oxford, 2000, p.254]. General sense of “untrue story, rumor” is from 1840.

MYTHIC (adj.) – From the 1660s, from Late Latin mythicus “legendary,” from Greek mythikos, from mythos (see myth).

MYTHOLOGY (n.) – In early 15c., “exposition of myths,” from Middle French mythologie and directly from Late Latin mythologia, from Greek mythologia “legendary lore, a telling of mythic legends; a legend, story, tale,” from mythos “myth” (of unknown origin) + -logy “study.” Meaning “a body of myths” first recorded 1781.

–=–

One might call the “student body” a “body of myths”, as they are literally engaged in the study (-logy) of modern myths (mythos).

Each individually titled character in American history, from presidents portrayed as fabled legends instead of frail old men, to philanthropists who steal from the poor only to partially give back to the poor in order to maintain the” welfare system”, are granted this modern mythological stature in the government’s educational lore called “textbooks”. For only from within the syndicate of the controllers of education is the lore chosen to be prescribed upon its studious victims. Thus, the purely patriotic (religious) myth of the “founding fathers” were born; known not as the masonic secret society it was but as the romanticized good guys that created this nation through a compact of indebtedness (constitution).

This doctrine is necessary to keep generation after generation as worshipers of their fathers; a fallacious title placed on a dark history in order to hide the true nature of the centralized syndicate that was berthed by those masonic founders. This historical lie is ingrained into the population thanks to government-required education. It is the institution of learned ignorance.

LEARN (v.) – Old English leornian “to get knowledge, be cultivated, study, read, think about,” from Proto-Germanic *liznojan (cognates: Old Frisian lernia, Middle Dutch leeren, Dutch leren, Old High German lernen, German lernen “to learn,” Gothic lais “I know“), with a base sense of “to follow or find the track,” from PIE *leis- (1) “track, furrow.” Related to German Gleis “track,” and to Old English læst “sole of the foot” (see last (n.)). The transitive sense (He learned me how to read), now vulgar, was acceptable from c.1200 until early 19c., from Old English læran “to teach” (cognates: Dutch leren, German lehren “to teach,” literally “to make known;” see lore), and is preserved in past participle adjective learned “having knowledge gained by study.” Related: Learning.

TEACH (v.) – Old English tæcan (past tense tæhte, past participle tæht) “to show, point out, declare, demonstrate,” also “to give instruction, train, assign, direct; warn; persuade,” from Proto-Germanic *taikijan “to show” (cognates: Old High German zihan, German zeihen “to accuse,” Gothic ga-teihan “toannounce“), from PIE *deik- “to show, point out” (see diction). Related to Old English tacen, tacn “sign, mark” (see token). Related: Taught; teaching. The usual sense of Old English tæcan was “show, declare, warn, persuade” (compare German zeigen “to show,” from the same root); while the Old English word for “to teach, instruct, guide” was more commonly læran, source of modern learn and lore.

Teaching particular skills as subjects has the design of separation, where deep knowledge is hidden in light of a particular subject matter. In this way, highly-skilled professionals are extremely low-skilled in everything else, and so never learn past what subject they are educated in. This creates specialists, which are perhaps the worst kind of advocate. For a specialist practices only his or her specialty, remaining purposefully blind to all other avenues of knowledge even when it co-relates to that specialty. In truth, knowledge knows no boundaries or subjection (subjects). But the best way to control a person is to limit their perspective, like placing blinders upon a horse.

Even physical education, hard work, and sleep for the common animals is part of the spell curriculum in school, where students can be recessed from mental education only to be breathed, slogged, and then napped:

BREATHE (n.) – c.1600, “a living creature, one who breathes,” agent noun from breathe. Meaning “spell of exercise to stimulate breathing” is from 1836; that of “a rest to recover breath” is from 1901.

WORKOUT (n.) – 1909, “boxing bout for training,” from work (v.) + out (adv.). General sense of “spell of strenuous physical exercise” is attested by 1922. Verbal phrase work out “solve” (a problem, etc.) is from 1848. Sense of “succeed” attested by 1909.

–=–

Perhaps you will study and learn the magic of being a pharmacist… or perhaps a pharmaceutical advocate and expert witness?

PHARMACY (n.) – From late 14c., “a medicine,” from Old French farmacie “a purgative” (13c.), from Medieval Latin pharmacia, from Greek pharmakeia “use of drugs, medicines, potions, or spells; poisoning, witchcraft; remedy, cure,” from pharmakeus (fem. pharmakis) “preparer of drugs, poisoner, sorcorer” from pharmakon “drug, poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment.” Meaning “use or administration of drugs” is attested from c.1400; that of “place where drugs are prepared and dispensed” is first recorded 1833. The ph- was restored 16c. in French, 17c. in English (see ph).

Or perhaps you may be a student of war and occupation under the Leiber Code, taking a career in the military and attending an academy for the purposes of receiving the ultimate credential – a license to kill!!!

CADET (n.) – c.1610, “younger son or brother,” from French cadet “military student officer,” noun use of adjective, “younger” (15c.), from Gascon capdet “captain, chief, youth of a noble family,” from Late Latin capitellum, literally “little chief,” hence, “inferior head of a family,” diminutive of Latin caput “head” (see capitulum). “The eldest son being regarded as the first head of the family, the second son thecadet, or little head” [Kitchin]. Apparently younger sons from Gascon noble families were sent to French court to serve as officers, which gave the word its military meaning. In English, the meaning “gentleman entering the military as a profession” is from 1650s, and that of “student at a military college” is from 1775.

–=–

Lost in this sense of unfounded superiority and honor, Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language explains that the truth about career military men and women is far less noble or honorable when put into simplistic terms of art:

SOLDIER, noun soljur. [from Latin solidus, a piece of money, the pay of asoldier ] 1. A man engaged in military service; one whose occupation is military; a man enlisted for service in an army; a private, or noe in the ranks. There ought to be some time for sober reflection between the life of a soldier and his death. 2.A man enrolled for service, when on duty or embodied for military discipline; a private; as a militia soldier 3. Emphatically, a brave warrior; a man of military experience and skill, or a man of distinguished valor. In this sense, an officer of any grade may be denominated a soldier.

MER’CENARY, adjective [Latin mercenarius, from merces, reward, wages, mercor, to guy.] 1.Venal; that may be hired; actuated by the hope of reward; moved by the love of money; as a mercenary prince or judge. 2.Hired; purchased by money; as mercenary services; mercenary soldiers. 3.Sold for money; as mercenary blood. 4.Greedy of gain; mean; selfish; as a mercenary disposition. 5.Contracted from motives of gain; as a mercenary marriage. (noun) One who is hired; a soldier that is hired into foreign service; a hireling.

VE’NAL –adjective [Latin venalis, from venco, to be sold.] 1.Mercenary; prostitute; that may be bought or obtained for money or other valuable consideration; as a venal muse; venal services. 2. That may be sold; set to sale; as, all offices are venal in a corrupt government. 3.Purchased; as a venal vote.

PROS’TITUTE, verb transitive [Latin prostituo; pro and statuo, to set.] 1.To offer freely to a lewd use, or to indiscriminate lewdness. 2.To give up to any vile or infamous purpose; to devote to any thing base; to sell to wickedness; as, to prostitute talents to the propagation of infidel principles, to prostitute the press to the publication of blasphemy. 3. To offer or expose upon vile terms or to unworthy persons. – (adjective) Openly devoted to lewdness; sold to wickedness or to infamous purposes. Made bold by want and prostitute for bread. – (noun)1. A base hireling; a mercenary; one who offers himself to infamous employments for hire.

MILI’TIA, noun [Latin from miles, a soldier; Gr. war, to fight, combat, contention. The primary sense of fighting is to strive, struggle, drive, or to strike, to beat, Eng. moil, Latin molior; Heb. to labor or toil.] The body of soldiers in a state enrolled for discipline, but not engaged in actual service except in emergencies; as distinguished from regular troops, whose sole occupation is war or military service. The militia of a country are the able bodied men organized into companies, regiments and brigades, with officers of all grades, and required by law to attend military exercises on certain days only, but at other times left to pursue their usual occupations.

–=–

The difference between a militia man and a military person should be clear at this point. For whom could be more an advocate (whore) of the syndicate than those who would kill others for profit on its behalf and in its name? Murder, even by any other name, is the primary degree of crime bestowed upon these mercenaries. A career soldier is not honorable. And so the artifice term of art by the name of “honor” is instilled into these mercenaries; a false religious belief that their actions are not merely for personal gain with the end of spreading the syndicate’s world monopolies by their boots, bullets, and bombs.

The horrific truth is that soldiers and police are hired to protect government and the syndicate from the people – to keep the people in their place as subjects and dependents.

Where is our militia to protect us from them?

–=–Conclusion–=–

The education of human animals is again not to offer self-actualizing wisdom or knowledge, but to instead create a class of persons that will not question the authority of the syndicate, its rules, and most importantly its opinions. The arrogance of those who wear this tempered status upon their lapel and hang their diplomas on their office wall is only a sign of how controllable that person is and how little it takes for him or her to sell their soul to the syndicate. Doctors peddle the syndicate’s drugs. Nurses peddle the syndicate’s vaccines. Attorneys peddle the syndicate’s statutes. Judges peddle the syndicates opinion’s. Teachers and professors peddle the syndicates history. And accountants peddle the syndicates double-books.

During the learning-to-labor process of education, as we work to achieve the proper level of control-ability (brain washing), we are allotted each semester what is called progress reports.

PROGRESS (n.) – From late 14c., “a going on, action of walking forward,” from Old French progres (Modern French progrès), from Latin progressus “a going forward,” from past participle of progredi (see progression). In early use in English especially “a state journey by royalty.” Figurative sense of “growth, development, advancement to higher stages” is from c.1600. To be in progress “underway” is attested by 1849. Progress report attested by 1865.

PROGRESS (v.) – 1590s in the literal sense; c.1600 in the figurative sense, from progress (n.). OED says the verb was obsolete in English 18c. but was reformed or retained in America and subsequently long regarded in Britain as anAmericanism. Related: Progressed; progressing.

PROGRESSIVE (adj.) – c.1600, “characterized by advancement” (in action, character, etc.), from progress (n.) + -ive, or else from French progressif, from past participle stem of Latin progredi. Of taxation, from 1889; of jazz, from 1947. Meaning “characterized by striving for change and innovation, avant-garde,liberal” is from 1908. In the socio-political sense “favoring reform; radically liberal,” it emerged in various British contexts from the 1880s; in the U.S. it was active as a movement in the 1890s and a generation thereafter, the name being taken again from time to time, most recently by some more liberal Democrats and other social activists, by c.2000. The noun in the sense “one who favors social and political change in the name of progress” is first attested 1865 (originally in Christianity). Earlier in a like sense were progressionist (1849, adjective; 1884, noun), progressist (1848). Related: Progressively; progressiveness.

–=–

To put this into perspective, it needs to be said here that at some point the idea of progression (progressiveness) with no means to an end is a dangerous calamity being sold to each new generation, with the purposeful intent to strain the ability of future generations to keep and cherish the values, ethics, and morals of their forefathers. How can a society be in a permanent state of progress and change? If progress is perpetual, then where does progress end? What is the purpose of a political foundation if not to prevent such oxymoronic political thought? This concept of unlimited or unending progress means that any ethical code or limits due to scriptural or other historical and sacred ethics and values attained by each advancement of progression will also necessarily need to be changed to fit the new progress and the people’s opinion of that progress. In this way the idea of liberalism being “one who favors social and political change in the name of progress” does not make sense as a permanent state of thought, but instead necessarily requires at some point in time that one’s liberal political stance must reverse itself when such progressive ideas have been met in one’s lifetime. Thus a political conservative must be created out of the satiated liberal who has attained his limited sensibility of what progress is in his lifetime based on defeating his own fathers morals, ethics, and values.

If progress is never-ending and seeks no limit, so too must be the degradation of all that is sacred and ethical.

For example, the medical practice of cloning has now jumped from of the pages of science fiction’s apocalyptic warnings into the hands of the industrialized syndicalists of the medical and scientific “progress” machine. It’s moral implications of yesterday must therefore also be progressed in the minds and beliefs of the new generations of mankind, or else such progress is just not possible as a publicly acceptable entity. Since there is no end to the liberal (progressive) possibilities regarding progress, both in mind and in reality, we have just opened a perpetual paradox that includes ultimately such concepts as the opening of Pandora’s Box just to scientifically prove what is inside. All of this is ironically based upon the newer generations being “educated” with progressive ideals, which necessarily must go against the old ideals in order to have progress from them. The education syndicate is teaching ever more liberal progressive sentiments to every new generation. Eventually those ideals that seemed progressive as a student become reality in the life of the “graduated” student in his or her chosen career, essentially creating generational morals and ethics that can only be described as temporary in nature. And at some time in his or her life, that former student of education will ultimately become conservative (a waning to conserve) of his or her once liberal ideals, for they eventually will come to fruition in the progression of that lifetime. This is the way of unhindered progress. This is how the antiquated notion of evil is being effectually bred into cultural society through the washing of young brains with “education” at an ever quickening pace. The young animals are being corralled, conditioned, and credentialed as with the brand of a farmer upon his cattle. And the older, more refined, already credentialed and experienced former liberal-turned-conservative animals are too vested in this ever-progressing machine to stand up for their more mature values, for they will be retiring soon and bestowed with fat pensions for which making a risky stand this late in life is said to be left to the younger generations. So there is no one experienced left to make a stand, except for the un-credentialed, un-enfranchised, un-respected men like myself, whom reside outside of the box looking in while warning those inside that the seems of the box are about to break.

But alas, with no credentials, who will listen to the likes of me? The disenfranchised? The impoverished? The critical patients? Before they can curtail the progression that will make their life’s work obsolete, the elder conservatives can only watch helplessly as their modernly established and decaying ethics and their now conservative values crumble under progress’s charge, and a new generation takes over while the older ones sell out to progress for the sake of old-age insurance and monthly pension stipends.

In the end, we don’t ever beat them, we cooperatively join them against our best interest – in the interest of our wallets.

And the steamroller ride into the progressive unknown continues as loosely scheduled, with no schedule at all, no end, and with no inhibitions or limits. We progress purely in the name of progress, for progress’ sake, with the goal of unrepentant progress. For we do not teach our children well, and in our stead allow government to do it for us, selling our responsibility for the chance to have taxpayer funded daycare that will ensure a “common core” of progressively educated fools enjoying an educated and managed autistic epsilon workforce.

The children are being taught that their parents are way too conservative to be a part of their generation’s new progressiveness – same as the old progressiveness – just like the last generation and the ones before it and forward in perpetuity. And they are given the tools of fallacy and idealism – of progress without meaning or logical reasoning – to defeat our warnings and loving advice. It is a fitting revenge to pay us back for our own similar learned behavior towards our parents in our own liberal childhoods.

And most importantly, the media is right there to support the progression of insanity, changing subtly the meanings of words like liberal and conservative with each new election cycle, ensuring the generational gap called “progress”.

So are you educated?

Do you claim your degree (of crime) in the name of syndicalist progress?

Is your precious diploma in a frame upon your office wall?

Are your children’s progress reports hanging under magnets upon the fridge?

Are you your own worst nightmare, or are you allowing the syndicate to turn your own child into that?

–=–The Syndicate In Action–=–

Listed below are some of my own research projects delving into the designs and methods of the syndicate.

My research lecture (video) on Common Core, Globalization, and Agenda 21 (highly recommended):