Saturday, December 30, 2006

I thought I’d seen it all, or at least most of it. Now there’s a web site for little girls. Not pedophiles, but for girls. At least that’s what the pedophiles want it to look like. Gee what a cute little web site with pink colors and pretty flowers and hearts.

Wow, they say nice things like, “Being pretty means having pretty ideas, thoughts and feelings.”And don’t forget, “If you like the graphics on this website, you can download them here for free! Neither the flower symbol nor the Special Friendship Symbol are copyrighted (I made them just for you!)”

Aww, isn’t that nice. They made that just for me!! There’s even a links section with links to cool girl and teen magazines and even educational sites. Oooh, and one to help me with my homework.

Ok, now for a reality check.

The links section may be titled “Special links for special girls”, but it has links to:

~ sites that promote removing age restrictions for sex

~ instructions on how to disable parental blocking software (for those kids who want to surf porn sites)

~ A link to “Older Man Love”- where a girl talks about her attraction to older men

~ And a site for “teens who are sexually active now or just thinking about having sex. It's called "Just Say Yes" because we're tired of people telling us what we can and can't do.”

Now for the real shocker. What Is Touching?

“You may have learned about good touching and bad touching. Probably you have been told that touching in the private parts of your body is ‘bad touching’. This is not always the case. This kind of touching is only ‘bad touching’ if you do not want to do it or do not feel comfortable with it.”

“A girl and a loving adult can form a very special bond, as the adult provides experience and knowledge, and the girl provides a fresh way of seeing the world and her excitement for life.”

They then go on to describe what kinds of touching are legal to do with your “special friend” and how to do it.

There’s a glossary that explains what words mean. “Consenting means that both people understand what they are doing and accept the responsibilities of doing it so that they can enjoy the fun of touching each other.” They go on to talk about how a child molester is a bad and selfish person, but a girllover has a “special appreciation” for young girls.

There are messages from young girls on the site. One is from an 11year old who asks about her much older boyfriend and what to do about her Mommy who doesn’t want her to see him anymore.

Here’s one of the responses from the site to this 11 year old girl:

“When adults find out that a child has been having consensual sex, they don't rush to support the child. They try to brainwash them. To convince them that what they enjoyed was actually a bad thing. That can't be done without also giving the impression that ALL sex is bad. You can have amazing experiences with an older person without risking all that.”

They have gone too far. I can just picture my niece stumbling across this pretty little web site. This is why parents absolutely have to have parental controls on their computer. Not just on their main web browser software, but something that covers internet explorer as well. Your children are at risk. You need to take precautions and monitor everything they do.

Friday, December 22, 2006

This story includes warnings from the London Child Abuse Investigation Command regarding paedophile activities online. Detectives state that social networking sites such as MySpace are being abused by paedophiles. From the article:

The type of pedophile also varied, according to Detective Constable Jonathan Taylor, a covert officer who pretends to be a 12-year-old girl during often long and painstaking inquiries.

All are white and usually aged between 30 and 50. But they can be family men, loners, grandfathers and professionals.

They target children by asking to be their online "friend" with most youngsters inundated with dozens of such requests every day.

One pedophile they monitored had around 300 "buddy" profiles, all of which were young girls, Taylor said.

The story profiles a recent case in which a "predatory pedophile" hit on a '12 year old girl' who turned out to be a detective at the CAIC. Well, I think this predator now officially qualifies as one of these:

This bill would increase the reporting standards for child pornography and obscenity against children. In other words....no more graphic, written descriptions of having sex with babies on Live Journal. Anyone hosting a website, a blog, a message board etc, would be required to report someone for posting such.

Millions of commercial Web sites and personal blogs would be required to report illegal images or videos posted by their users or pay fines of up to $300,000, if a new proposal in the U.S. Senate came into law.

After child pornography or some forms of "obscenity" are found and reported, the Web site must retain any "information relating to the facts or circumstances" of the incident for at least six months. Webmasters would be immune from civil and criminal liability if they followed the specified procedures exactly.

In addition to the provisions relating to child pornography, the bill also would ensure that sex offenders will register information relevant to their online activities on sex offender registries. Specifically, it would require sex offenders to register their email addresses, as well as their instant messaging and chat room handles and any other online identifiers they use. If a sex offender failed to do so, he could be prosecuted, convicted, and thrown into jail for up to 10 years. The bill would also make the use of the Internet in the commission of a crime of child exploitation an aggravating factor that would add 10 years to the offender’s sentence.

WOWZA! This bill, if passed will have massive, far-reaching effects on the online pedofreak community! No longer can blogger say "It's not our business what people write, or images bloggers use. " NO, no, Blogger themselves will be held responsible if they don't follow a specific set of rules. Pedo message boards won't be able to simply DELETE a risque comment, no they will have to save the information AND report it themselves. Does that strike anyone as...well, quite funny? It does me. Actually I got rather tickled about it. Wonder what the pedofreaks have to say about it. First let's look at what a pedo-apologist has to say....

"This constitutionally dubious proposal is being made apparently mostly based on fear or political considerations rather than on the facts," said EFF's Bankston. Studies by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children show the online sexual solicitation of minors has dropped in the past five years, despite the growth of social-networking services, he said.

That was from Kevin Bankston an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and former ACLU attorney). He's used a typical pedo-trick. Partial fact stated in such a way that it gives the reader a false impression. Here are the facts from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children 2006 Youth Internet Safety Survey (in comparison to the 2001 survey)

A smaller proportion of youth Internet users received sexual solicitations. In YISS-1, 19% received such solicitations, and in YISS-2, 13% received such solicitations. Plus a smaller proportion of youth Internet users were visiting chatrooms and communicating online with people they did not know in person. These findings suggest youth Internet users may be more aware of the risky nature of online encounters with such people.

The Internet remains a source of disturbing and offensive solicitations for many youth.

Even though a smaller proportion of youth Internet users received sexual solicitations, the proportion with the most serious incidents, aggressive and distressing solicitations, did not decline.

The extent of unwanted exposure to sexual material among youth is extraordinarily high and grew between the times YISS-1 and YISS-2 were conducted. Approximately one third of youth Internet users (34%) had an unwanted exposure to sexual material in the past year, an increase from 25% in YISS-1 that occurred despite increases in the number of families using filtering, blocking, or monitoring software

Now, let's take a look at the pedo-chatters. I don't think we'll find any surprises here.

The Walker: many sex offenders these days are only on the sex offenders registry because they were found guilty of possessing child pornography...Nor is there any compelling evidence that I am aware of that looking at sexual oriented pictures of children inevitably leads to the sexual molestation of children. It is my personal opinion that simply viewing images does not in any meaningful way imply one is an actual sex offender of the sort that needs constant surveilance.....I definitely don't feel that because someone looks at CP pictures but is not actively involved on the production end of the business they should be regarded as a sex offender.

Joey Bishop: How many kids in Southeast Asia did John McCain drop bombs on in an unjust and unneccesary war? IMHO, shooting kids with semen is far more morally just than shooting them with bullets.

Seamus: I lost the little bit of respect that I had for him after reading this; he is simply pandering to people's fears that something might happen to their kids. This is as cynical and exploitative as it gets.

Turtle: this is not really a strike at predators. it is a thinly veiled attack on all child lovers,whether they have been convicted for breaking the laws or not. its simple biggotry. they aim to ban us all from the net,which is insane considering most of us dont seek minors online...

Let your voice be heard, write your Senator today and let him know how you feel about this. And why.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Apparently a new commenter here by the name of Dididiot thinks it is. Hmm, perhaps it is to him..... all just a game, I mean.

So, I'm going to explain a little about how it relates back to my previous post about Pedo Logic. How in noticing the frequency of folks entering AZ through a google search for that term, followed by Dididiot's idiotic comments concerning an AZ member's blog, and a famous writer.....I thought more about this. I thought about the sick feeling I get in the pit of my stomach when I see someone come here through a search for

Now, I'm quite sure that anyone googling those phrases were NOT wanting to find AZ. But I bet the people who found us searching for the following were.

"How to tell if husband is pedophile"and"What if your child is a pedophile"or"How long average pedo spends in prison"

We are a relatively 'young' blog in the scheme of things. 6 months old and we've had 50,000 hits here. That's nothing to sneeze at. We must be doing something right. And there must be a LOT of people out there concerned about pedophilia.... and that should concern us. Either pedofreaks looking for something they shouldn't be looking for, trying to find an 'anti' to start a brawl with, or out trying to promote kiddie perving. But we also have people who are very troubled. Either because of their own past experiences with pedofreaks, or their own current experiences or interest in child safety.

Another search term is Pedo or a Pedo-Combo I call it. You have your standard Pedophile, Paedophile, Paedosexual, Pedo, Paedo and then the multi combos come in.

BoyLove 11 year oldandBoylove 10 year oldandBoyLove 12 year old....etc

Then out of the blue a really interesting one pops up....

"reasons why an inmate doesn't like child molester"

Well, I'll be darned! Someone had to do a search for that? It was obviously a pedofreak, as no NORMAL person would have to ask why.

Sometimes we get searches for familiar names, ie Rookieeeee, Lindsay, Todd with an occasional olive freak thrown in for good measure. We also had 63 entries from the search term 'Kaylor' over a 3 day period, but I don't count that because they all came from Kaylor. Interestingly enough there's not been one single entry from a search for Dididiot. Or Didaskalos either for that matter.

So, no. This isn't a game. We're serious. Dead serious. Dididiot and any of his pedo pals should understand this. There's a lot of serious people out there. And there's very few of you in comparison. Oh yeah yeah I know what you all say about your numbers. That's Pedo Logic.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

One day I noticed that we were getting a lot of visitors to AZ through a Google search for the term Pedo Logic. At first I thought it rather strange but then I realized that none of us understand pedofreaks logic, probably even they don't understand it. So I thought we'd talk a bit about Pedo Logic and what it really is.

We all realize these guys are missing something, we don't understand why they can't comprehend and accept basic concepts. So, I figure it's like this. They can't accept that they are wacko, because they build these scenarios up in their heads, they say to themselves "I WANT IT and I will talk myself into circles until I find a way to make it fit. I will FORCE it to make sense SOMEHOW!" Which is where the nodding pedo heads come in. (HT to Jacey!) They don't really care if it makes sense, or if it's accurate, or if it's true, they just agree if someone says something that they want to be true.

So what does Pedo Logic look like? I'm going to give you three examples.

Sample Pedo Logic #1

A perving on kiddies housekeeper, he's got a thing for the daughter of his employers. When the boss is away ... the perv comes out to play. He starts by invading the little girls space. He goes through her room, he touches her belongings, he strips her of her privacy. He gets bolder and bolder, he starts to sniff her panties. He steals her panties. He becomes obsessed. He stops doing his job and just hangs out in her room. The little girl is unaware of this. In fact this little girl is even unaware of the birds and the bees, she likes her Barbies and her Dora the Explorer. She likes Saturday cartoons and Disney movies. She's just a kid, she gets to be carefree that way. But the perving on kiddies dude, sees her smile at him. And he's spent so much time in her space, with her underwear, fantasizing about her, wanting her that well he just doesn't see this as an innocent smile. NO NO What we've got here is a 5 year old girl who wants to get in his pants.

WA LA Pedo Logic.

Sample Pedo Logic #2

The little girl is playing, oh maybe doing some back flips or some such as that. Sometimes her panties show, or her blouse flips up. She doesn't even notice it. She's just this carefree kid, playing her game. But she looks up with the little girl face - the only face she has - she's happy, she's smiling, laughing, innocent. But the person watching her isn't like normal men. No, he's a perverted piece of shit who views the world through a distorted pedo-lens. What have we got? A 5 year old flashing him, because she wants sex with him.

WA LA Pedo Logic.

Sample Pedo Logic #3

Here we have a typical freakopath. He has 14 apples, 33 oranges, 65 grapes, 8 pineapples and 6 bananas. He adds them altogether. Divides by 7 cups of coffee, multiplies by 3 sodas, and subtracts 2 beers. What has he got? A 5 year old girl who wants to play with his genitals.

WA LA Pedo Logic.

So... now you know about PedoLogic. Please leave the samples you've run across in the comments!

Paedophiles are notorious for making blatantly stupid allegations rather than an actual argument. The most recent example of this is the infantile claim that the fairy in the artwork on Daydreamer of Oz is a child. The first allegation was made here by Didaskalos who says:

Though why anyone who was trying to project an "anti-ped" image would feature a naked 12-year old girl-elf on their homepage is beyond me.

Well like all paedo lies, it spread like wildfire. Psychotic Bill Evans decided to jump on the bandwagon and rant and rave at BoyChat about the image. He goes even farther than Didaskalos, claiming that the fairy is 8. Even when a fellow paedophile tells him he's wrong, he continues:

The physical proportions...of an 8 y/o are quite different to an adult in the length of the torso, limbs and head size. The proportions of the female in that sketch are much closer to those of an 8 y/o than those of an adult. Probably sub-conciously so, but still those proportions would tend to draw the eye of a CL considerably more than of a "normal". The "boobie" could even be the right hand, and not a boobie at all...

As an attempted swipe at me, these comments do not concern me in the least. However, the creator of this artwork - Selina Fenech - is an amazing artist who does not deserve to have her work slandered and misinterpreted in this way.

Therefore, I contacted Selina and alerted her to this issue. The title of this piece of work is Rockabye in the Treetops and can be found in Selina's gallery here.

Reproduced with permission, is Selina's response to these allegations:

The artwork Rockabye in the Treetops is definately, and I think quite clearly, not a child. I don't generally age my fairies, but if I had toI'd say she was no less than 17-18 human years old, which is in fact the age I was when I drew this artwork.

Now would you paedophiles please stop making me prove you wrong? I've got a lot of packing to do.

And Bill - those libel laws that you're so fond of and clearly don't understand - I'd um steer clear of them if I were you.

We had a visitor yesterday from the University of Colorado. He called himself "AZ sucks my a$$ " and he left us a little present. Some lyrics from the rock group Pungent Stench, titled Rex Paedophilus. Now I just simply cannot repeat all the lyrics here, but I did leave his comment, if you have the stomach to read them they are located here

And here's a small sampling of the other lyrics from 'Pungent Stench'

Suffer The Little Children To Come Unto Mechildhe's coming for youthere's nothing that you could do

he lurks the nighta ghoul with cruel intentionswaiting for you to cross his waya predator

The Testament Of Stench

the works of the flesh are manifestindeed our goal supremeadultery is advisablefornication a virtuedefinite uncleanness and sexual lasciviousnessthe most beautiful ever

School's Out ForeversometimesI wake up in the middle of the nightvoices in my head trying to ignitethe burning hate that's driving me insanegrabs my mind and strikes my soul with pain

These lyrics praise sexual addiction, shooting kids in a classroom, raping babies and more more more. Now, whether or not this group of scum have the right to produce and sell music with those lyrics, is not the topic of this post. The topic IS....someone at the University of Colorado is using their internet resources to post pro-pedophilia information. Is this acceptable?

Absolutely not. I will be sure to update you with the University's stand on the issue.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

"I AM A PERSON WHO SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS"

According to Hulann and so beautifully outted by Iluv2surf. I do believe we need to talk more about this. You see, Hulann states:

It's true that I was convicted in 1994 of Aggrivated Criminal Sexual Abuse for Masterbating in front of a 10-year-old boy my Y.F. at the time- The cops had nothing on me until I myself volunteered the information in a police interview which lead to the only evidence they had on me. Such a dumb person I was then by not retaining a lawyer for the police questioning and thinking that the boy would tell all or they would keep at him until he did - He told nothing as I later found out but too late for me to take back my words.

I was sentenced to 2 years probation and ordered to undergo Therapy for Sex Offenders...

this post insn't about the Suicide attempts made durring the 5.5 years of Therapy this post is to state why I am not a SEX OFFENDER.

the thearpist wanted it to be drilled into us that the term SEX OFFENDER is only a label that one can not change but a person that has SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS can change because it describes an act that a person can change and doesn't place Label on that person that he can not escape from.

Well I reckon that's applicable to lots of people, eh? Scott Peterson wasn't a murderer!!! Hey Hey! He was just a person who murdered his wife and unborn baby!!!! Kenneth Lay wasn't a thief!!! Oh no, he was just someone who stole from others! And doggone it, even Ted Bundy wasn't a rapist! He just raped women and girls. John Couey wasn't a child molester! He was just a man who molested children. Dear God, we could go on and on. This is brilliant! The ultimate PC criminal lingo!

Wonder what the nodding pedo heads have to say about it?

grahamsworld:

Your life was totally ruined and turned into a living nightmare for an act which was certainly a victimless crime.

Parents and caregivers who physically abuse their children, who beat them, neglect them, starve them, isolate them and turn them into angry, rebellious teenagers are tolerated by Society and the Law, yet a harmless act like this is given penalties harsher than some convicted of manslaughter receive.

2 years probation? Ok.

Nickless:

This is why I don't give a damn...about people, society, others, "humans in general". Most people would condemn you, Hulann, even now. I choose to condemn your condemners. What you have gone through, I can only imagine. I try to picture myself in your past situation, in the bowels of the "justice" system; and all I see is a rage so vast that the murder and mayhem that would follow is unspeakable.

hangtwenty:

...I have no idea where you are exactly, but if your case hinges on the word of one person against your word..without any other witnesses or charges.... then any decent lawyer should get you off..!

apollo11:

Reading posts like this really make me angry.

Especially when you consider everything you went through that changed you're entire life around (one might say for the worst) just because you wanked off in front of a kid.

So friggin what? Think about it... You masturbated in front of a kid and you get all that

Hulann:

I didn't go into to it yet but another part of that Group session greeting besides saying You have SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS was to talk about how if not stoped the possibility of Escalation of abuse.

Yes, I can say 100 percent I wanted things between me and the 10 year-old to go further and it prob. would have

Here's an idea. You can call an apple an orange, but guess what? It's still an apple and a pedovore is still a pedovore whether you call them pedophile, MAA, or childlover. Heck, I reckon you could call them oranges too if you wanted. Why don't you start a campaign.... Here's a slogan you can use

Monday, December 04, 2006

Dunx alerted us here to a filthy paedophile site hosted on LJ. Since that time, we have been in contact with LJ regarding this issue. I am happy to report that LiveJournal appears to be taking the standards of their content very seriously. In their response to me they state:

LiveJournal has a strict zero tolerance policy regarding child pornography and/or direct solicitation of minors. We encourage all of our users to report such material to us as they discover it, and we take swift action to remove it when it is reported to us.

The account that Dunx alerted us to has indeed been removed, LJ explains:

In this case, the material you have reported to us has crossed the line into specifically soliciting and advocating illegal acts, and therefore we are able to suspend the accounts in question.

We are now in the process of investigating all of the people who were associated with that particular blog.

Our campaign to have the filth removed from LiveJournal is ongoing. Please feel free to contact/alert us to any inappropriate material you find and we will certainly keep you updated on our progress.

What a load of crap.I wish I was making that up, because it sounds like a comedy routine. Can you see it now? Leno, or Robin Williams, or Dave Chappelle, standing in front of an audience, doing a bit about something like this? Sometimes, life really is stranger than fiction. Floyd, I hope you get your just rewards in prison... bitch.

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Quite a lot, it seems. We have recently come under attack in this post at BoyChat regarding the quote you see in the header by Kahlil Gibran. The thrust of the argument is this: Gibran may have been groomed and molested as a child by F. Holland Day; he subsequently became successful as an adult. Therefore we at Absolute Zero condone and promote ‘boylove’ because we appreciate Gibran's work.

“Kaylor” declares that he’s paid us his ‘first’ visit and is simply appalled that we would use any of Gibran’s work. He goes so far as to claim:

Through this cap-quote and its citation, "Absolute Zero" has made, in their ignorance, one of the strongest cases for pederasty ever formulated, a case for its beneficial impact on the young, its importance to culture, and its timelessness.

The reasoning behind his argument is this:

Kahlil Gibran (Gibran Khalil Gibran; 1883-1931) was the *loved boy* of the preeminent American Uranian photographer, Fred Holland Day (1864-1933)

Fact or opinion?

I personally chose that quote and feel no need to justify my choice or its use to the likes of “Kaylor” or anyone else at BoyChat. However, for the benefit of our dedicated readers, I offer the following:

Firstly, there is NO evidence that Day had an inappropriate relationship with any child. In fact, the F. Holland Day Museum denies the claims outright on their "common errors" page:

There is no evidence that Day had a sexual relationship with any of his models. Although Jussim implied that such relationships were possible and others have perpetuated this assumption

Secondly, there has never been so much as an accusation that Gibran himself was a paedophile; we know for a fact that he was not. So it comes down to their claim that Day “made” Gibran what he became. This is utterly absurd conjecture. By all acounts, the most important influences in his life were women!

Gibran was possibly groomed and molested as a child but managed (through his own brilliance) to become a successful man. Does that make our use of his words inappropriate? To the contrary, I cannot think of anything more appropriate.

The psychotic child molester Bill Evans seemed to think that this information would come as a revelation to us and the quote would be removed.

I will simply say that this is not ‘new information’ to me or anyone else here at Absolute Zero. We knew it was possible that Gibran was groomed as a child which added meaning rather than detracted from its use.

Should anyone have further questions/grievances regarding the use of this quote, I suggest you read through the available information on Gibran (not Day – it was not his words that I used). Alternatively, you can leave a comment here or drop me an email to discuss the matter further.

Friday, December 01, 2006

This is Rookiee, aka Damien Roberto Andres Cole of Pomona, California. He is a pedophile. He likes little boys. He thinks the age of consent for sex should be lowered. Cole, whose online handle is Rookiee Revolyob, is one of the internet’s most dangerous pedophiles. Besides maintaining online journals advocating child molestation, he hosts a podcast which praises pedophilia, sex with the underaged, and child rape.

He is an active member of various online forums, one of which is called “boychat” and on which he shares his depraved thoughts about little boys. His online name, Revolyob, translates in English into “boylover” when spelled backwards.

In addition to his internet activities, his MySpace page reveals that he is engaged in a relationship with a young boy, one he has been manipulating since the child was ten years old. His pedophile associates have gone so far as to accuse him of collecting child pornography and there are unconfirmed reports that he may be under federal investigation for his activities.

We urge you to take extreme caution in dealing with Mr. Cole. Most importantly, please keep your children away from him. He is known to frequent Disneyland and Renaissance Fairs in the area, and represents a definite danger.

Do kids even have time to be kids and experience that which you and I, now in our 50's or 60's now, managed to experience years ago?

You've all seen the internet e-mails. And despite them, I tend to agree: we elders came from a generation not familiar to those living now.

-- I didn't have to fear my peers;-- I didn't have to fear my neighbors;-- I didn't have to fear my community;-- I didn't have to fear my city or my county;-- I didn't have to fear my government at all.

Now, if I'm interpreting things properly, I have to fear everyone and everything I come in contact with.

Monday, November 27, 2006

MISSION VIEJO, Calif. -- An English teacher at Trabuco Hills High School was free on bond Monday while authorities investigated allegations that she had "substantial sexual contact" with a male student, a sheriff's spokesman said.

Alyssa Ann Johnson, 31, of Tustin, was arrested Wednesday evening at her home by sheriff's investigators, who received word of the allegation through officials at the Mission Viejo school, said sheriff's spokesman Jim Amormino.

"We heard about it through school social services," he said. "He took an English class from her.Amormino declined to release any additional information that could identify the youth, other than to say that he is "older than 14 and younger than 18."

Johnson, who was booked on suspicion of oral copulation, posted $50,000 bond and was released on Thanksgiving Day, Amormino said.

Johnson has been placed on administrative leave from the job she held about four years, the spokesman said.

Farrah Emami of the Orange County District Attorney's Office said the case has not yet been presented to her office for charges.source

Although it's not as common, women molest and abuse children too. A lot of the time the suspicion is written off as part of normal child care duties and hygiene. Also, when women abuse teenage boys, men often think of it as 'cool' or laugh it off saying how 'lucky' the boy is.

By denying that women molest young boys, these young men are not helped in understanding that sex between adults and children is wrong. When it's okay for a 30 year old female to take a 14 year old boy as a lover, why should it be considered wrong for the boy when he turns 30 to take a 14 year old girl as a lover?

It's time to stop giving these female teachers a 'slap on the wrist'. They are abusing kids. They are abusing their power and they are criminals. They deserve the same punishment as a man who abuses young girls.

He can't say he wasn't warned. and he can't say he wasn't arrogant and obnoxious. Heck he even won our most repulsive visitor to AZ award, he won it fair and square.

He's out now. Thanks to Velocity and Iluv2surf . Follow the links for the full story and a picture of

'I-can-do-what-I-want-and-you-can't-stop-me-Rookieeee'

Of course he's whining about it on BoyChat. But we know what that means, don't we? And besides Rookieeee, I do believe you had an in-your-face pedologues episode where you said:

The anti's know who I am. I know they know who I am. I've suspected it for quite a while now, actually. And they seem to think that by outing me I'm going to stop making this podcast. Hmm, they're sadly mistaken. Not only do I know that they know, but I WANT them to know that I know. And I want them to know that they're simply the most chicken shit little pieces of self-righteous scumbags on the face of the earth. They think that they can break me, blackmail me, threaten me, scare me?

Well, I have a message for them: "KISS MY ASS". I just might be one little broke college student from so-cal, I might even be a perverted pedophile who lusts after children, but at least I have my dignity. If you out me, I'm free. And there's nothing that could stop me from continuing head first into this, because you would have already done what I fear most.

You got your wish Rookieeeee. Now shut up about it and go crawl into a pedo hole somewhere where you belong. If you're lucky you might get to hide awhile before the Feds getcha.

What is really sad is all the community leaders rallying to him, writing letters saying what a great guy he is, how active in the church and community. What party he was involved with isn't that important, but what is important is that connections allow him to get off with a slap on the wrist.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Lindsay Ashford that smiling, weasely, nauseating scumbag is at it again. Gimme Gimme Gimme he begs. As always, he needs money. And he always has a scam, of one sort or another. It may be trying to use someone's good name....against their will. Or it may be nickel and diming pedo-pals, but you can always bet on one thing for sure. It's always to benefit himself.

Now Lindsay is hiding out in another country, one maybe like, oh, say Panama for example. Stuff is cheap and little girls are even cheaper. Or should we say easier to molest. Either way he needs money because you see, he's just not very marketable in the employment arena. He calls it The Price of Honesty and whines:

Since 2002, Puellula/HFP has been committed to presenting the truth about pedophilia (girllove, childlove, amaros — whatever you want to call it). For nearly five years I have managed to offer all of the resources to you completely free of charge. I have donated literally thousands of hours of my time to ensure that the many facets of our sexual orientation are brought to light in the hope that others will have their thoughts and perceptions of us challenged.

The cost of this public stance has been enormous. There are many job opportunities that have been denied to me and I have lost jobs as a direct result of who I am. Existing clients have cancelled work with me and potential clients have declined to work with me upon discovering who I am. In short, my public advocacy of pedophiles and pedophilia has exposed me to unending uncertainty and insecurity. Whilst I am not threatened with having my service terminated by my web host, I am threatened with being unable to pay the rent, the electric bill and other living expenses.

Therefore, I am appealing to all of you who value my work and wish to see it continue to make a financial contribution to my efforts. In return, I give you my assurance that I will never give up this worthy fight and will continue to give my utmost to sharing the truth with the world.

I hear all you pedo's out there, the ones who haven't yet learned your lesson, pulling out your checkbook. Well, there's a sucker born every minute to be sure. But if you don't believe he's manipulative, go back and read that statement of his very very carefully. Especially the part about how he's donated thousands of hours to the maintenance of his own personal website of which you have no say so or control of. Yeah be sure and read that part. And then if you still feel compelled to support his sorry self, well there's only a few ways you can send him money you know. Paypal won't be involved in any activity which even remotely supports pedophilia, so that's out. You'll have to send him cash, or wire it to him. Better go check out Western Union and see what's required. The next thing you know we'll have girl chatters trying to figure out how to use pigeons or some other non-traceable means for pedo-exchange. Sheesh.

Remember though, don't send any money to Todd. He's no longer the money collector. He has this nasty little habit of ... er ... confiscating funds.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

- The existence of a blog such as Absolute Zero;- My ability to be on the AZ team;- To have been solicited to become a member of AZ;

- That we are: "A community of individuals pledged to fight paedophiles on the web. We are committed to the safety and emotional well-being of all children."

- That I have made new friends in the form of Christopher, Stitches 77, Daydreamer of Oz, Sues, Anti Pedophile Mother and all the wondrous members of the AZ Team;

- Our ability to be centered on our goal and not deterred by the minions of darkness.

It is an honor to write for Absolute Zero, and to "fight the good fight."

If we do not speak up for children -- then who will?

May the blessings of the season find us, our families and our children safe, happy, at ease, relaxed, and able to experience the wonders of childhood insulated from the corruptive forces constantly nipping at our heels.

And you know what I mean.

"I enter upon my eightieth year, with thanksgiving to God for all the blessings and mercies which His providence has bestowed upon me throughout a life extended now to the longest term allotted to the life of a man; with supplication for the continuance of those blessings and mercies to me and mine, as long as it shall suit the dispensations of His wise providence, and for resignation to His will when my appointed time shall come."

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

UPDATE: This is a scam, please see this page for information. I apologize for the information being posted without a better check on it.

We have a Deli manager (Acme Markets) from Philadelphia, Pa who has a 13 year old daughter who has been missing for 2 weeks.

"I am asking you all, begging you to pleaseforward this email on to anyone and everyone you know, PLEASE. My 13 year old girl, Ashley Flores, is missing. She has been missing for now two weeks. It is still not too late. Please help us. If anyone anywhere knows anything, please contact me at:

Mr Grange, the spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers on child protection and managing sex offenders, also told the newspaper that the law on child pornography should apply accordingly.

"It's much more of an issue for me if a child is under 13," he said.

"I think the closer they get to 16, the more it becomes a grey area and I think everyone in the field of dealing with sexual health and sexual activity acknowledges that."

This is what happens when believers in absolutes are chased from civil life. They are replaced by true believers in relativity.

In defence of British bobbies; The rot has set in at the top. Nevertheless, we are in the horrendously priveledged position here in Britain to be witness to the intentional spiritual desecration of the heart of the greatest, most beneficial and most benevolent Empire the world has ever known. It is the greatest show on earth, dwarfing the most grotesque of the Roman emperor's inaugural bloodlettings by an order of magnitude, aided and abetted all the way by our technology and I think more importantly the enforced servitude that that same technology foists upon us, the emasculation of our natural protectors.. Men.. You and me.. Which is all, I suppose, a fancy way of saying that things will get much much worse before they get better.

We now have a chief police officer, who allegedly has experience in the area, giving a nod and a wink to screwing 13 year old girls. He will retain his job, while keeping an eye out for the inevitable pay rise.

Ill finish the post here as anything else would just be rubbernecking at the scene of the crash.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

She is known in federal court documents only as "S.M.C."At the age of 13, they say, she was smuggled into the U.S. from Oaxaca, Mexico, the first leg of a horrific journey that led her to a Harding Place area apartment.There she was beaten, raped and forced into a life of prostitution — an ordeal requiring her to have sex with as many as 40 men a day.This week federal authorities said they arrested two people and charged them with the sex trafficking of children. Juan Mendez and Cristina Andres Perfecto, both of Nashville, were named Thursday in a complaint filed in federal court in Memphis.Federal officials in Memphis, who began the investigation, and Metro police, who assisted in a raid at the Harding Place area apartment last week, said it is the first case to their knowledge involving children smuggled into the country to be forced into the sex trade."Obviously, we're concerned about it, and it's certainly our intention to keep this investigation going," said Lee Anne Jordon, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Memphis.Investigators will be as aggressive as possible to stop the trafficking, Jordon said.Federal authorities said it's too early to tell how large the ring was or whether all perpetrators have been found.The girl, now 15, is the only juvenile victim identified, Jordon said. However, court documents say the victim's cousin and other women also have been forced to sell their bodies. Like the teen, officials said, they were lured to this country by a promise of honest jobs in the U.S. so they could send money back to their families.In an interview Friday, Mendez's wife said she didn't know anything about the charges and that she had not seen her husband in more than a week."I'm not sure what's going on, but I'm not going to let him run around with other women," Maria Rita Hernandez said through an interpreter outside her apartment on Hickory Trace Drive in south Nashville.She said she has lived in Nashville for the past five years and that she and Mendez have two children, ages 5 and 1.It was a series of raids at Memphis brothels that led federal authorities to Mendez and Perfecto, FBI agent Randy Thysse said.After the raids, a man the girl had befriended who ran a brothel in Memphis tipped off federal authorities about the trafficking ring and about the girl.They found her after Smyrna police received a tip. Afterward, she was taken into the custody of the state Department of Children's Services.She is now in a foster home of Spanish-speaking people and will get counseling and any other treatment she needs, DCS spokesman Rob Johnson said."Under the circumstances, given all that's happened, this girl's doing well — all things considered," he said.Eventually the goal will be to reunite her with her family, but DCS investigators will be looking closely at the circumstances that led her to this country, he said.Court documents say that in August 2005 Perfecto went to the girl's family of farm laborers in a rural area of Mexico. She told them that Mendez, her boyfriend, could help the girl get a job as a waitress in a Nashville restaurant.She assured the girl's family that she would make enough money to send some back home.Perfecto, authorities said, told the girl that she and Mendez would have to pay smugglers $3,000 to get her into the United States and that she would have to repay that once she started working.Perfecto and the teenager were captured twice by the U.S. Border Patrol but eventually were able to make it to the United States. Once in Nashville, she met Mendez and was taken to an apartment at 5099 Linbar Drive.There, court documents allege, Mendez raped her and threatened to kill her family if she did not work as a prostitute. She was 14 at the time.The girl told investigators that she was a virgin when she arrived in Nashville and described the rape as very painful.Two weeks later, court documents say, Mendez took her to a Kentucky brothel and forced her to have sex with 14 people on the first day. Afterward she was sick with a headache and severe pelvic inflammation and had to be hospitalized for several days.Mendez let her rest for two weeks after her release from the hospital but then forced her to work as a prostitute in Nashville, Knoxville, Memphis, Birmingham, Ala., and other cities, the federal documents say.She was never allowed to leave unescorted and never ran away because she was afraid for her family, the account says. Authorities arrested 29 people, 10 of whom have been indicted, federal officials said.Last Saturday agents with the bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement took Mendez and Perfecto into custody.A 2004 federal Department of Justice report estimates that between 14,500 and 17,500 people annually in the U.S. are victims of human trafficking, either forced to work as prostitutes or laborers.An international relief organization with a hub in Nashville will begin training Metro police next year to investigate sex trafficking."It's very new for us to have on our radar in Tennessee, but" sex trafficking is "not a new thing," said Amber Beckham, coordinator for World Relief's Network of Emergency Trafficking Services. • From the Tennessean.

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

A man died from injuries sustained when he was beaten by outraged Motherwell residents after he raped a five-year-old girl, Port Elizabeth police said on Tuesday.

Captain Verna Brink said the child's mother had told elders in the community about the rape, which took place on Saturday. The community was then mobilised to take action against the alleged rapist on Monday.

"They beat him with sjamboks and their fists while others held him down," said Brink.

Police dispersed the crowd and took a badly injured 35-year-old Mhleli Phali, along with the girl's mother, to the police station.

"Phali confessed to raping the girl on Saturday. He said he told her to go to the shop for him and when she came back he raped her in his home and threatened to kill her if she told anyone," said Brink.

He also told police he had given her 50 cents before sending her home.

Police did not take him into custody as he had sustained severe injuries. He later died while being transported to the hospital, said Brink.

"The mother is being questioned because she did not report the rape to the police immediately and took matters into her own hands, but no arrests have been made."

The five-year-old girl has since received medical attention and social workers have been called in to assist with counselling.

This petition will be used to encourage governments, politicians, financial institutions, payment organisations, Internet service providers, technology companies and law enforcement agencies to eradicate the commercial viability of online child abuse.

They have the power to work together. You have the power to get them to take action.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

A man who was sexually abusing a young girl in his home was arrested after he transmitted images of the assault via the Internet to an undercover detective, police said Thursday.

The girl, a preschooler, was rescued two hours later in what Toronto police's child exploitation unit said was its first case of observing a live assault.

"My first reaction was that I wanted to reach through the monitor and grab the child," said Detective Paul Krawczyk, the undercover officer who witnessed the alleged assault Sunday.

He alerted police in St. Thomas, a city in southwestern Ontario where police believed the man lived, and they were able to track him down in two hours.

"To see this child and look that child in the eyes and realize that the child was live somewhere, being abused, we had to save the child right then," Krawczyk said at a news conference. "The minute we realized what was happening, we went as fast as we could."

Software Program Aids HuntKrawczyk belongs to Toronto's Child Exploitation Section, acclaimed for its work tracking down child pornographers on the Internet. Microsoft teamed with the detectives last year to launch a software program designed to help police forces around the world hunt down child porn Internet traffickers.

"The message to all pedophiles and people who want to sexually exploit children on the Internet is that we are on the Internet 24/7, we know where you are and we will find you," Krawczyk said.

Krawczyk, who was posing as an online pedophile, said he established a relationship with the man in an Internet chat room for pedophiles in January.

After the detective gained his trust, the suspect on Sunday sent still images recorded on a Web cam, which were transmitted in "real time" to a private site, which Krawczyk declined to disclose.

"I can't get into exactly what the program is," Krawczyk told The Associated Press, "but you see the images immediately. I was talking with him and, I can't get into the details of what were in the pictures, but I knew that it was happening live."

Cause for ArrestHe said the identity of the 34-year-old man was not being released to protect the girl. He declined to say whether the suspect was related to her.

Krawczyk said the girl was safe with family members and getting medical care.

The man's bail hearing was set for Tuesday and he faces 10 charges of sexual assault and the production, possession and distribution of child pornography.

Krawczyk said that although he had established a relationship with the suspect last January, it was not until Sunday, when he observed the live assault, that police had cause to arrest him. He would not say how he tracked the suspect down to St. Thomas.

The Child Exploitation unit is credited with helping Florida police locate a young girl who had appeared in a series of sexually explicit photographs taken at a Walt Disney World hotel.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Amongst so many other things, copyright laws seem to be something the paeds just can’t seem to grasp. I first became aware of this phenomenon when reading this thread on the Visions of Alice forum.

You see, a member was concerned about possible copyright breaches when paedophiles steal photos from online albums and upload them to VoA. Well of course the other members jump in to share their infinite wisdom regarding copyright.

We see the typical bizarre justifications:

Raccoon states:

Breaking a law that is not working in the best interest of the general population is not a crime but an act of civic duty.

F.P.J. Mask shows typical paedophile disregard for anyone else:

Yes, it would break these people’s hearts to see their family pics on a site like this. But we can’t cave in.

Childdriver, well…..

Somehow I thing if a lea were to break into my computer and trump up some criminal charge, I’m pretty sure copyright infringement would not be what they come up with.

Ok these sorts of demented rationalizations were expected. But what wasn’t anticipated was the complete misinterpretation and lies that followed. See, Lawndog thought he’d set them all straight:

There is a “limited use” clause in the copy right law that says for the sake of promotion or review a portion of copy righted material may be used. One could argue that the posting of pictures from modeling or other copy righted sites is done to review what is seen there, ie “Sandra looks really hot in this picture”

Well it was a good effort anyway, wasn’t it? Considering their capacity for thought and intelligence, I thought it was pretty decent.

What Lawndog is referring to is known as the doctrine of fair use contained in section 107 of the Copyright Act which does allow for the use of portions of copyright work. Poor Lawndog failed to realize that an ENTIRE picture really doesn’t qualify as a portion; it is therefore excluded from any protection under fair use. There is no exact measure of what portion of a particular work may be copied, courts determine whether each individual case is a matter of fair use or not. In making this determination, the courts will consider the following:

a. Purpose & character of the useb. Amount & substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.Copyright Office

I think perhaps they all sensed that Lawndog’s reasoning was skewed however they follow up with even more ridiculous crap. Apparently the idea that gained the most support is the one that follows.

Frederick starts us off with:

I fall into the category of: “If you post something on the internet, it becomes public, ‘nuff said.”.

Even more amazingly, a moderator on the board known as Hedonist supports this completely absurd notion:

If the pictures in question are on a site to be shared with the general population, it falls under the laws of public domain.

You don’t really know whether to laugh or cry do you? For anyone out there who believes the above rubbish, I would suggest you read this page which addresses common copyright myths. As the author states,

Nothing modern and creative is in the public domain anymore unless the owner explicitly puts it in the public domain. Explicitly, as in you have a note from the author/owner saying, “I grant this to the public domain.” Those exact words or words very much like them.

I personally find it pretty frightening that one of the people charged with maintaining the ‘legality’ of that site can make such brazenly stupid false statements with no understanding whatsoever regarding the law he refers to and advises users on.

After PeeJ posted a screenshot of a repulsive forum discussion, D really does give it his best shot:

Both GirlChat and Heirophant now have copyright claims against PJ and their hosting provider. The former has a copyright on the design of the screen, and the boilerplate text. H. of course owns his own words. Everyone who replied has a copyright to their subject lines.

I was originally going to provide a detailed explanation of why this falls under fair use and therefore none of them actually have a valid claim. But I don’t really think that is necessary; can you guess why?

they’d have to slither out of the toybox and show the world what they really are to file a suit against PeeJ

So instead I’ll leave you with Daydreamer’s Top 10 Copyright Lessons For Paedophiles:

1.Your opinion of the law is entirely irrelevant.

2.You need moderators who understand the laws they are advising you on.

3.Your opinion that a civil suit against you is unlikely does not mean it won’t happen...

4.It doesn’t matter whether a copyright notice is visible or not, the pictures are still protected.

5.Attempting to shield your words behind an extensive copyright notice does not preclude others using it under the terms of fair use.

6.A screenshot or preview IS fair use.

7.Stealing an entire picture is NOT fair use.

8.Public domain is not a literal phrase. By your line of reasoning, this - that car is in the public domain (street) therefore its now public property - would make perfect sense. Dumbasses, get a clue.

9.You will never bring a copyright suit against PeeJ because you cannot afford for Xavier to find out who you are.

10. I invite and encourage any paedophile who thinks they have a copyright claim against me to file a suit and meet me in court :)

Monday, October 30, 2006

After receiving a tip about this monster, I contacted various officials, and an investigation ensued.

“A Lafayette man was jailed Wednesday on a child pornography charge. 20-year-old Nicholas Baudoin was arrested by university police on ten counts of pornography involving a juvenile.” source

Recently I came across some information that led me to a pedophile that was using a children's organization as a hunting ground for victims. He thought it would be cool to sign up with the organization in order to “get a boy back into [his] life”.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

On horseback, steamboats and jets. The mail always gets through..........or does it?

For those of you who have been keeping up with the attempt by Perverted Justice to shut down Pedo sites you should be familiar with this. Read more HERE and HERE.

The pedofreaks don't seem to want to go quietly into that good night. They believe they can get a court injunction to stop the closing of their pedo sites. They believe somehow, that they can FORCE someone to sell them a service which they don't want to sell them. Go figure.

Well, naturally they need money for the attorneys, and naturally when they begged for donations and got lots of pledges, all those pledges have somehow not appeared....promptly. They're a little bit worried now. They're down to the wire. They need $20,000 pronto.

But ya know, thinking about this it just reminded me so much of something else. Remember the whole Save the Children fiasco? We wrote about it HERE and HERE. Also HERE, HERE and HERE

And thinking of that reminded me of THIS and all the pedo-anxiety they all experienced when they talked about making anonymous donations. They had so many suggestions concerning how to make donations while remaining SAFE, that you couldn't help but chuckle. Some suggestions included:

Only send cashMail from another locationWear surgical glovesDon't use lickable stamps....but if you do use a sponge and bottled water...But wait! Can water residue be traced?

And Porcelain seems the most concerned

"Why would I worry about a cash donation via the US postal service... well most letters these days are given a tracking number very close to the mail box the letter is taken from, hence, a route, especially in less populated areas, would allow the all pervasive government to narrow a search down considerably."

If they aren't doing anything illegal, what the hell is wrong with them? Stick a check in the mail and be done with it already! But then that's the Girl Chatters for you. Now we have the Boy Chatters trying desperately to get hold of some money. They don't want their message board to go down, no, it's almost like a lifeline for them. I mean heck, who else is going to tell them how wonderful they are? There's just a weeeee little problem here.

Lot's of eyes are on them.

They must be careful, you see.

One helpful pedofreak posted a a USPS chart with the length of time it takes the mail to arrive and the cost! Wow! How very helpful.

But when he referred those guys to the USPS website, and also instructed them to use a fake return address, perhaps he should have instead directed them to the Postal Inspectors website. You think? I guess in their pedo-hysteria they didn't realize there are laws about such things. And that those laws are Federal. And that their donations just might not ever arrive. Ever.

The number of registered sex offenders living in Dorset has risen by nearly 40 per cent in three years, says Jane Reader of the Daily Echo.

Statistics released by the government today show there are more than 500 violent and sexual offenders being monitored across the county, 379 of whom are on the sex offenders register.

The numbers were revealed as part of the MAPPA (Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements) annual report.continued...

It shows the numbers on the register have steadily increased from 273 in 2002/03 to 333 in 2003/04, 352 in 2004/05 and 379 in 2005/06

The police say that this doesn't necessarily mean there are more offenders, just that more are registered and being monitored.

Detective Chief Inspector Ivor Graham of Dorset Police who said only 28 of the 526 offenders under their care are deemed to be so dangerous that they need high-level monitoring and active multi-agency input.

The figures are released just days after a convicted sex offender was warned he would be locked up for life after he was convicted of abducting a six year old girl from her bath and raping her in North Tyneside.

Peter Voisey, 35, who already had a conviction of sexually assaulting a child, dumped his victim naked on the street.

Sounds positive, right? Only 28. Of course, you might think different if your child was a victim of just one of those 28. One child, one life, one soul.

And you must also consider the findings of Dr. Gene Abel:

Pedophiles commit more than 10 times as many sexual acts against children as do non-pedophile molesters. On average, a molester with pedophilia commits 70.8 molestation acts.

If only 3 of those 28 sexual offenders were paedophiles, they could collectively be anticipated to perpetrate more than 200 molestations.

That is a big deal and merely one of the many reasons why the registries and intense monitoring are so important.

Saturday, October 21, 2006

The school says its "Afraid to ban Baldwin in case it was accused of breaching his human rights"

So on the one hand they have the fear of childeren being molested, on the other they have the fear of being sued and they choose to run the risk of having kiddies being molested while they wait for definitive legal answers.

What about moral answers? We are all equiped with a soul at birth, and that must take precedence over law or mindless fascism results.

I tell you this. Were I headmaster, he would not be allowed on the premesis. I would take that responsibility on my shoulders, and tell the teachers so. Its my decision and thats what would happen, even if I had to throw him off myself (Did you hurt your head? oh, im terribly sorry, I didnt see the pavement there). Any liberal legal advice to the contrary would be ignored, and i would go to court and potentially prison for it. What pathetic craven scum we put in charge of our schools now. At least in America Christians are not afraid to call a spade a spade.. "Some Christian leaders even have said it could be considered child abuse just to register children in such a facility"

We all know that just like both normal people and homosexuals, most paedophiles dont change their orientation. And yet current policies allow them to be released incase they don't kill or rape any more childeren, instead of not releasing them incase they do. Which they do. Again and again. Now, in an extention of that bad moral judgment, the "human rights" laws that the powers that be created to replace codified common sense are cowing school's into allowing convicted, repeat offending, child molesters to use the gym right next door to where the young school kiddie's change(d) with the doors open.

Thought for the day; "An eye for an eye", as presented in the Bible, is a call for proportionality. It was Ghandi who turned it into one for pacifism. Now while I have a lot of repect for him, it is important to realise that those of his followers who marched peacefully towards the British garrison in file to get their heads bashed in did so voluntarily. These childeren arn't there voluntarily and have no control over the predators in their midst. It is up to us to act as men and take up the Bible's call for an Eye for an Eye before the whole world goes blind.

Thursday, October 19, 2006

CNN's Glenn Beck started a 4-part series on virtual porn starting October 16. Porn is the #1 moneymaker on the web, and has been touted as America's new addiction. How did I find out about it? In this article, "125 arrested in child porn roundup". About half way down the article, you will find a link to a preview of Glenn's series. It's frightening.

The article doesn't mention the name of the website they raided, nor does it mention the names of any of the 125... but it does mention that one was a Boy Scout leader, one was a middle-school sports coach, and one was a former Christian camp counselor. According to U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie, Operation Emissary was based in New Jersey, but the round-up resulted in arrests more than 21 states.

Mr. Christie issued this warning to child pornographers:"You are not anonymous. We can and we will find you."

Damn straight, Mr. Christie. I wonder if any of those caught were any of our "frequent visitors", eh? I know, I know... they'll say "I'm not a child pornographer... I'm a Child LOVER". I say... BULL. If you have sexual contact or sexual fantasies involving children, chances are you've indulged in child pornography too.

I also say "Watch Out. We will hunt you down, find you, and turn you lose in an adult prison... Bitch."

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Yes, you read that title correctly, "Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 , pointless?" Really I should be phrasing that as a statement, but I decided to do it as a question, in order to allow you a chance to ponder it over and come to a conclusion yourself.

If you recall, I recently wrote about Kenneth Hopson, the father of two young girls who was convicted of having 130 images and movies, all child porn depicting sexual abuse of young girls. Some around the same age as his own daughters, some just toddlers. Gloucester Circuit Judge William H. Shaw III sentenced him to .... ONE year. Yep, just one. To make this story even more startling, Gloucester Circuit Judge William H. Shaw III is also handling the divorce in this case, which will most likely effect visitation with his children. I can only begin to fear the way that will turn out- as Shaw clearly doesn't see the danger Hopson poses to children- including his own.

The reason I bring this case up, is because believe it or not we have introduced and accepted into law the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, which in Federal cases requires a minimum sentence. But, what good does it do if the States do not back the law? If you have charges in a state case, then that Law means nothing. It doesn't help ensure that these dangerous people are locked away, it does nothing. NOTHING.

Before you start to think that this case is a lone case, and that situations like this rarely happen, you might want to take a closer look.

An Avon man who had been found with scores of images of child pornography on his computer and videos of children being violently raped has avoided prison time.Edward J. Burke III, 47, was given a suspended sentence last week after going into a courtroom expecting to spend up to four years behind bars.Burke, 47, of Avon, was convicted in a plea deal of two counts of first-degree possession of child pornography.Prosecutor John F. Fahey told Judge Thomas P. Miano that Burke had 141 photo images and two videotapes of known child victims on a home computer. The victims ranged in age from toddlers to prepubescent children.Fahey and Burke's defense lawyer, John D. Maxwell, had worked out a deal that called for Burke to receive up to four years in prison, five years' probation, and mandatory sex offender registration for 10 years.But the agreement gave Maxwell the right to argue for a completely suspended prison sentence, which was granted by Superior Court Judge Thomas J. Miano.

Different case, different judge, even worse outcome.

Burke will spend NO time in jail. Again, the courts deemed him a low risk and deemed the protection of children from this scum bag "just not worth it". I'm amazed they even had the willingness to take it to trial, or even arrest him for that matter. What a complete waste of time, and how dare the rest of us sit here shocked that yet another sexual predator has been handed a lollipop and sent on his merry way.

For more interesting tid bits on this case, see Steve Huff's post on it... he's picked up a few interesting facts on Miano.

And I pose the question, is the Adam Walsh Child Protection Act pointless? Seeing as how individual States have decided to reward child porn criminals rather than punish them? Can we rely on these laws to protect us when they only apply to Federal cases?

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Jessica's Law, Proposition 83, Megan's Law, Dylan's Law, Adam Walsh Child Protection & Safety Act all of these enacted and/or proposed laws came about due to a heinous act and the death of a child.

We all feel revulsion when we learn of these acts of atrocity. It sickens us, we feel pain in our hearts for what the child went through and we empathize with the victims survivors.

But imagine for a moment that it were your child.......difficult isn't it? And while we would never wish any of these things on anyone....we're still glad that it's not our own when we hear of it.

We look at them, our children, with wonder. They, whom we love like no other, are our treasures. We know that no one will ever hurt our children. No, not ours. Why?

Because it would be too much to bear. It would be beyond our comprehension to even imagine it. And yet, those things do happen, have happened and will continue to happen until we put a stop to it. Until we say:

NO MORE!ABSOLUTE ZERO TOLERANCE!ONE STRIKE AND YOU'RE OUT!NO EXCUSES!

You who would harm a child, you who would even think of it, you who steal children's underwear and photos from family albums, you who produce child pornography, distribute it, or possess it, you who fantasize about toddlers and babies, you who molest children and call it love, you who spread your filth around the internet and encourage your 'brothers'....your time is up. You can either get back into that toybox you crawled out of or pay the consequences. Tolerance is not an option.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

(CBS) LOS ANGELES A 7-year-old boy allegedly abducted by his father was found safe after a driver saw an Amber Alert and called police with a matching vehicle description and license plate.

Jacinto Alejandro Jiron was abducted around 5:50 p.m. Saturday in Sun Valley. Police was searcing for the father's teal green Toyota Corolla. A driver in Ontario spotted the vehicle and called police, according to Los Angeles police Sgt. M. Patton of the North Hollywood Station.

The boy's mother was also abducted, Patton said, adding that both mother and son are safe. Jacinto Cuerro, the boy's father, is suspected in the abductions. The father has not been arrested, however the California Highway Patrol reported that they had the mother and son.

I was walking and talking with S when I mentioned I was bored in my life and was considering getting a foster child. He looked at my with his most serious boy look and informed me that I really should and told me what a great idea it was. He even later recommended I get a 10yo boy

I think the poor kid is trying to save himself, makes sense especially since Vespucci has talked about the boy being jealous when he was around other boys. But then he reassures us that he probably never will apply because

it gets taxing being that responsible for that long. At least as a AF only there is no real responsibility.

To be honest I will probably never go through with all of the paper work to be a foster parent. It is probably easier to marry a single mother and off her

(THAT WAS A JOKE) He proclaims.

And the anatomical deadspace quips back with

Isn't that what foster kids are for...To spicen up life when your bored, and to discard when you have something else better to do?

Then he comes up with a way to perv on kids without having to doanything He says: I feel so guilty! I know how many of you like to look at state sex offender registries looking at all of the pictures and seeing if you know anyone well today I did something slightly different. Appearently my state has an adoption web site were you can view pictures and biographies of adoptable children.

Yes Vespucci is really mouthy. When his pals have trouble finding jobs he advises them that most places don't do background checks and the best bet is to "Flat out lie!"

He tells us about sniffing his friends underwear to see what it's like. He didn't like it and ended up calling his pedopals who do "PERVERTS!"

He tells us about a time he exposed himself to a young boy in the men's room while at the movies to see "CARS".

He tells us about hanging out at the swimming pool and spying a striking 8 year old boy.

there were no pesky lifegaurds and the pool was nearly empty

Tomorrow I think I will bring some toys with me when I go to swim laps. Riding his bike he can't carry any with him and a football or a tennis ball will work wonders.

BTW, I am not going to go on about his lithe tight wet body that glistened in the sun as he climbed out of the side of the pool nor will I mention the way he fit his swimsuit ever so perfectly because, as we know, that would violate the rules.

In another post he tells us about being unemployed and living in a low-rent apartment complex witih "a great abundance of single mothers and unfathered boys. I took an immediate liking to 1 in particular". Unfortunately it didn't last long, as Vespucci says

Although she never confronted me she accussed me of doing things to C

To defend himself he accuses the Mom of things he deems to be unsatisfactory, such as

an alcoholic who likes to sleep around with black men with recordsOver time the woman became jealous of the time I spent with C and his younger brother.

And even turtle (you will remember him from GirlChat) gets in on this one, he says:

if someone is overprotective of their kids i always choose to assume that its either because something sexual is going on or its because the parents are into illegal activities.

OH! Is that what it is?

it tears me up when i see the slow damage done by parents like this. a kid starts out early in life as a sweet funloving kid,with no clue how fucked up the situation is.but kids grow and learn. as they get a little older,you can see fear and a question in their eyes. this is usually when they reach out for attention by being clingy or acting out. as they get a little older,they smile and laugh even less. you can now see the beginnings of anger and despair. they can still be saved at this point,but it usually doesnt happen. they are beginning to figure out that noone cares,and they are virtually on their own. a little more time goes by and they are almost completely changed. very little is left of that once beautiful child,so full of love and wonder. they have given up. they are broken. they are cynical. their seldom laughter is evil and full of contempt for others. they become cruel at this point,and often violent. by 12 or 14,they have become their parents,or worse.

yet this is better than a loving embrace from a sick pedophile,right? i hate society...

Sounded like the effects of child sex abuse to me, hmmmm.

But then, ah the camping trip. Vespucci asks:

How to convince a boy he wants to go camping? Really, Im asking. I have taken S(12) camping before and he loved it yet he adamantly refuses to go again

Some of the suggestions he receives are

Buy him a camera

take him rock climbing

sweeten the pot with archery

or shooting, fishing, or hunting

Remove the thing that keeps him from wanting to go

Then we have a piece of advice from lookin who tells Vespucci

Well...I remember your story about the last camping trip. Maybe you ought to read your own post to see why he might not want to be out in the woods with you again, hmm?

But of all Vespucci's stories the one that stuck with me the most was his car wreck he had with S the 12 year old. Yeah, it really shook Vespucci up pretty bad. You might say his life flashed before his eyes. And in so doing he had an epiphany....

At times I am S's dad and he is my son. We don't mention it but that is the relationship. And then at other times we are just best friends and we treat each other as age peers. Really I am in new territory here.

I have never loved a boy beforeonly lusted after onesI could not have.

So there you have it. The story of Vespucci. The boylover who had never loved a boy before.

About

A community of individuals pledged to fight paedophiles on the web. We are committed to the safety and emotional well-being of all children. This site will serve as a resource for those committed to our fight wherever you may be in the world.