An inside look at the science of cleaning up and fixing the mess of marine pollution

As Oil Sands Production Rises, What Should We Expect at Diluted Bitumen (Dilbit) Spills?

This area is where the Enbridge pipeline leaked nearly a million gallons of diluted bitumen (dilbit), a tar sands oil product, into wetlands, Talmadge Creek, and roughly 40 miles of Michigan’s Kalamazoo River in 2010. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

A Whole New Experience

This was my first and NOAA’s first major experience with damage assessment for a dilbit spill, and was also a first for nearly everyone working on the cleanup and damage assessment. Dilbit production and shipping is increasing. As a result, NOAA and our colleagues in the field of spill response and damage assessment are interested in learning more about dilbit:

How does it behave when spilled into rivers or the ocean?

What kinds of effects does it have on animals, plants, and habitats?

Is it similar to other types of oil we’re more familiar with, or does it have unique properties?

While it’s just one case study, the Enbridge oil spill can help us answer some of those questions. My NOAA colleague Robert Haddad and I recently presented a scientific paper on this case study at Environment Canada’s Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program conference.

How Is Diluted Bitumen Different from Other Heavy Oils?

Dilbit is in the range of other dense, heavy oils, with a density of 920 to 940 kg/m3, which is close to the density of freshwater (1,000 kg/m3). (In general when something is denser than water, it will sink. If it is less dense, it will float.) Many experts have analyzed the behavior of heavy oils in the environment and observed that if oil sinks below the surface of the water, it becomes much harder to detect and recover. One example of how difficult this can be comes from a barge spill in the Gulf of Mexico, which left thick oil coating the bottom of the ocean.

What makes dilbit different from many other heavy oils, though, is that it includes diluent. Dilbit is composed of about 70 percent bitumen, consisting of very large, heavy molecules, and 30 percent diluent, consisting of very small, light molecules, which can evaporate much more easily than heavy ones. Other heavy oils typically have almost no light components at all. Therefore, we would expect evaporation to occur differently for dilbit compared to other heavy oils.

Environment Canada confirmed this to be the case. About four to five times as much of the dilbits evaporated compared to intermediate fuel oil (a heavy oil with no diluent), and the evaporation occurred much faster for dilbit than for intermediate fuel oil in their study. Evaporation transports toxic components of the dilbit into the air, creating a short-term exposure hazard for spill responders and assessment scientists at the site of the spill, which was the case at the 2010 Enbridge spill.

An Environment Canada study found that two types of diluted bitumen (dilbits), Access Western Blend (AWB) and Cold Lake Blend (CLB), evaporated more quickly and to a greater extent than intermediate fuel oil (IFO). The two dilbits are shown on the left and the conventional heavy oil, IFO, on the right. (Environment Canada)

Since the light molecules evaporate after dilbit spills, the leftover residue is even denser than what was spilled initially. Environment Canada,Witt O’Brien’s/Polaris/WCMRC, and SL Ross measured the increase in dilbit density over time as it weathered, finding dilbit density increased over time and eventually reached approximately the same density as freshwater.

These studies also found most of the increase in density takes place in the first day or two. What this tells us is that the early hours and days of a dilbit spill are extremely important, and there is only a short window of time before the oil becomes heavier and may become harder to clean up as it sinks below the water surface.

Unfortunately, there can be substantial confusion in the early hours and days of a spill. Was the spilled material dilbit or conventional heavy crude oil? Universal definitions do not exist for these oil product categories. Different entities sometimes categorize the same products differently. Because of these discrepancies, spill responders and scientists evaluating environmental impacts may get conflicting or hard-to-interpret information in the first few days following a spill.

Lessons from the Enbridge Oil Spill

Initially at the Enbridge oil spill, responders used traditional methods to clean up oil floating on the river’s surface, such as booms, skimmers, and vacuum equipment (see statistics on recovered oil in EPA’s Situation Reports [PDF]).

After responders discovered the dilbit had sunk to the sediment at the river’s bottom, they developed a variety of tactics to collect the oil: spraying the sediments with water, dragging chains through the sediments, agitating sediments by hand with a rake, and driving back and forth with a tracked vehicle to stir up the sediments and release oil trapped in the mud.

To bring submerged oil back to the water surface, cleanup workers employed tactics such as spraying the sediments with water and agitating sediments by hand with a rake. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

In August of 2011, cleanup workers drove a special tracked vehicle back and forth across the bottom sediments in Morrow Lake (a reservoir along the Kalamazoo River) to release oil trapped in the mud. (NOAA)

Shown in August of 2011, these heavy chains and other equipment were involved in agitating submerged oil from the sediments of the Kalamazoo River following the Enbridge oil spill. (NOAA)

Once the oil was released from the sediments and returned to the surface, responders could collect and remove the oil. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

These tactics resulted in submerged oil working its way back up to the water surface, where it could then be collected using sorbent materials to mop up the oily sheen.

While these tactics removed some oil from the environment, they might also cause collateral damage, so the Natural Resource Damage Assessment trustees assessed impacts from the cleanup tactics as well as from the oil itself. This case is still ongoing, and trustees’ assessment of those impacts will be described in a Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan after the assessment is complete.

A freshwater mussel found crushed in an area of the Kalamazoo River with heavy cleanup traffic following the 2010 Enbridge oil spill. (Enbridge Natural Resource Damage Assessment Trustee Council)

For now, we can learn from the Enbridge spill and help predict some potential environmental impacts of future dilbit spills. We can predict that dilbit will weather (undergo physical and chemical changes) rapidly, becoming very dense and possibly sinking in a matter of days. If the dilbit reaches the sediment bed, it can be very difficult to get it out, and bringing in responders and heavy equipment to recover the oil from the sediments can injure the plants and animals living there.

To plan the cleanup and response and predict the impacts of future dilbit spills, we need more information on dilbit toxicity and on how quickly plants and animals can recover from disturbance. Knowing this information will help us balance the potential impacts of cleanup with the short- and long-term effects of leaving the sunken dilbit in place.

Jessica Winter is an Environmental Scientist with the Office of Response and Restoration's Assessment and Restoration Division. Based in Seattle, she works on hazardous waste sites and oil spills in the Pacific Northwest and in the Great Lakes region.

2 thoughts on “As Oil Sands Production Rises, What Should We Expect at Diluted Bitumen (Dilbit) Spills?”

It seems obvious that companies that want to transport oil should have on hand and immediately available, all relevant information that describes the material they are transporting and proper methods for responding to a spill into water, into wetlands, on dry area, etc. Significant fines should be assessed if these are not filed, not accurate, or not available during semi-annual inspections. Stepped up oversight of pipe evaluations needs to be implemented, and exceptional fines for those incidents that occur when a pipe has not passed an inspection. What about the fact that because these products are not classified as oil, the carriers do not contribute to the federal fund intended to provide for response and restoration? That must be corrected!

Hi & thanks for your thoughts. Regarding inspections, the National Transportation Safety Board’s made some similar recommendations as part of their investigation of the Enbridge spill:http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/summary/PAR1201.html
Regarding characterization of the material, it can be much more complicated than I initially expected. Some of the shorthand terms we use (like dilbit or conventional crude) turn out to be ambiguous because different groups sometimes categorize the same products differently- some base their categorization on the method used to extract the oil from the ground, but what we really want to know in the short term is how the oil will behave in the environment. Environment Canada’s studies are really useful in predicting the behavior of the two oils they tested, but there are many different blends that haven’t received as much detailed study.

Post navigation

NOAA’s Office of Response and Restoration Blog

Welcome to the Office of Response and Restoration's blog! We're part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Learn more at our official government site: http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/.

Search This Blog

Search for:

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.