Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2018

The Diasporist of Drohobycz / Nathan Goldman in: The New Inquiry May 7, 2018

In
1989, the Jewish painter R. B. Kitaj published his aesthetic philosophy in his book, First Diasporist Manifesto.
In the manifesto, he describes “diasporism” as “an unsettled mode of
art-life” rooted in the rootlessness of a diasporic artist. The
diasporist’s experience of dislocation becomes a creative resource for
an art form that embraces restlessness and dispersion, treating the
diasporic condition not as a deficiency but as a realm of possibility.
Diaspora is creatively generative; diasporist art—for Kitaj, both a way
of painting and a way of living—is what it generates.

More than two decades earlier, in 1967, Jacques Derrida, too,
considered the aesthetic fecundity of diasporic Jewishness. In “Edmond
Jabès and the Question of the Book,” Derrida links the figure of the Jew
to the figure of the Poet and describes the Jewish relation to language
as inherently diasporic. For Derrida, exile is the source of Jewish
poetic creativity, which arises from a diasporic longing for a homeland
that does not conclude in the attainment of a nation. Because this
longing looks forward without the intent of culminating in the return to
a homeland, it is inexhaustibly generative—an ever renewable
“adventure” of continually deferred fulfillment.Twenty-five years before the publication of Derrida’s inquiry into
diasporic Jewish poetics and forty-seven years before the release of
Kitaj’s diasporist manifesto, Bruno Schulz—a writer of the Jewish
diaspora—was murdered by a Gestapo officer while carrying a loaf of
bread to his home in Drohobycz, the small Polish town where he spent
nearly his entire life. During his lifetime, he published two remarkable
books of strange and stirring stories. He left behind another book of
four longer stories and the manuscript of an unfinished novel titled The Messiah, entrusted to unknown persons he described only as “Catholics outside the ghetto.” All of this work has been lost.Schulz’s literary legacy is fractured; absence lies at its heart. In Regions of the Great Heresy
(first published in Polish in 1967), a collection of biographical and
critical essays on Schulz, Jerzy Ficowski—a Polish poet who, after an
early encounter with Schulz’s stories, became an expert on his life and a
champion of his work—laments this situation. “Most likely,” he writes,
“Schulz’s major work would have been the now lost novel Messiah,
in which the myth of the messianic coming was to symbolize a return to
the happiness of perfection that existed at the beginning of time.” But
the incompletion of Schulz’s oeuvre has not undermined interest in it.
Rather, it has fueled it. Philip Roth and Cynthia Ozick, two of the
major American Jewish writers of the 20th century, each penned novels
that stem from Schulz’s murder and the loss of his work. Roth’s The Prague Orgy
(1985) concerns Nathan Zuckerman’s journey to Prague in search of the
manuscripts of a murdered writer based on Schulz, while Ozick’s The Messiah of Stockholm
(1987)—dedicated to Roth—follows a Swedish man who believes himself to
be Schulz’s son and who happens upon what might be the lost manuscript
of The Messiah. The tragic truncation of Schulz’s life and the
destruction of much of his work have given both his life and his work a
diasporic incompletion that has proven aesthetically generative. ... [mehr] https://thenewinquiry.com/the-diasporist-of-drohobycz/