Weary of the War on
Christmas

The war on
Christmas is right here in
my backyard.

The Puritan Parliament banned Christmas from
1659 until 1681.

The Registry
of Motor Vehicles (RMV) in Braintree,
MA had
to take down their
Christmas ornaments when an irate customer complained. The customer
stated it
was insensitive of RMV, who services people of all religious faiths, to
highlight only Christmas.

The governor
of Rhode Island,
Lincoln Chafee, tried to avoid the controversy he generated last year
(calling
the state house Christmas tree a ‘holiday tree’) by having a
surprise holiday tree lighting. His office gave just 30 minutes’
notice.

Last year,
the Daily Mail reported, “The governor defended his decision
by arguing
that it is in keeping with the state’s founding in 1636 by religious
dissident,
Roger Williams, as a haven for tolerance - where government and
religion were
kept separate.”

Is there
really a war on Christmas, some ask?

Well, it
depends not only on whom you ask, but which type of Conservative
Christian you
are.

Some see the
war on Christmas as an assault on Christianity. They see the
elimination of
even the mere utterance of the word as gradually being expunged from
the
holiday public lexicon. It feels to these Christian holiday revelers as
if the
country, in its effort to be politically correct, is moving toward
religious
intolerance. For many Christians, this is one of their high holy
holidays, and
it’s their religious bedrock that not only anchors them in their faith
but also
shapes and governs them in their view of the world.

The author
and Christian apologist, C.S. Lewis, eloquently captured this essence
when he
wrote in his 1945 essay Is Theology Poetry?, “I believe in
Christianity
as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but
because by
it I see everything else.”

The political
correctness concerning how, in public, to
inclusively greet and speak about this holiday season borders on
fanatical. What will this
war of words lead to?

In an email
exchange about this war of words, a friend from North Carolina wrote, “It’s a Xmas
tree for
me and holiday tree doesn’t cut it. This PCness
feels
like it’s over the top. Next will be the word ‘Easter’... And what
about
‘Saint’ as in St Patrick Day...a big deal in Boston.”

Using
political and economic clout to cripple stores for not showing
commercial
deference solely to Christmas, desecrates the character of our
multicultural
holiday season. In the 1970s, Evangelical Christians were so outraged
by the
secularization and commercialism of Christmas that they were protesting
to “put
Christ back into Christmas.” But now they want more commercialism for
Christ,
thus extolling materialism as piety as we see these churches’ radical
shift
from the pew to the marketplace.

In 2009, the
American Family Association boycotted Target for using “Happy Holidays”
in its
advertising. The Catholic League that year boycotted Walmart, and Bill O’Reilly
promoted his “Christmas Under Siege” campaign that polices stores using
the
phrase “Happy Holidays.” William Donahue of the Catholic League told
MSNBC’s
Joe Scarborough that the problem is “secular Jews who hate Christianity
in
general and Catholicism in particular.” Pat Robertson said on his 700
Club
television show that the problem is Muslims.

“Secular
progressives are driving this movement,” Bill O’Reilly said. “They
don’t want
it as a federal holiday, they don’t want any message of spirituality or
Judeo-Christian tradition because that stands in the way of gay
marriage,
legalized drugs, euthanasia, all of the greatest hits on the secular
progressive play card. If they can succeed in getting religion out of
the
public arena...”

What
will this war of words lead to?

Truth be
told, Muslims, secular progressives and Jews have never been the folks
trying
to abolish Christmas. Instead, it was once an extreme group of
Protestants --
yes, the Puritans. With the date of Dec. 25 deriving from the
Saturnalia, the
Roman heathen’s wintertime celebration, and with the date found nowhere
in the
bible stating it as the birthday of Jesus, the Puritan Parliament
banned Christmas
from 1659 until 1681.

The
intolerance of a multicultural theme for this holiday has little to do
with a
heightened renewal of the birth of Christ by the Christian Right.
Instead, it
has much to do with a backlash spearheaded by Christian conservatives
as the
country continues to grow more religiously pluralistic. It’s a
situation that
threatens the centrality of the centuries-long stronghold evangelical
Christianity has had on this particularly holiday.

As a
Christian, I know that the central message of the birth of Christ is
the
embrace and celebration of human differences and diversity. And it is
with this
message that I know all people - religious and non-religious, straight
and
queer, black and white - can be included to enjoy and to celebrate and
to
acknowledge this season with one simple greeting.

Happy
Holidays!

BlackCommentator.comEditorial
Board member and Columnist, the Rev. Irene Monroe, is a religion
columnist,
theologian, and public speaker.She is the Coordinator ofthe
African-AmericanRoundtable of the Center
for Lesbian
and Gay Studies in Religion and Ministry (CLGS) at the Pacific School
of
Religion.A native of Brooklyn, Rev.
Monroe is a
graduate from Wellesley College and Union Theological Seminary at
Columbia
University, and served as a pastor at an African-American church before
coming
to Harvard Divinity School for her doctorate as a Ford Fellow. She was
recently
named to MSNBC’s list of10
Black Women You Should Know. Reverend Monroe is the author ofLet Your Light Shine Like a Rainbow Always:
Meditations on
Bible Prayers for Not’So’Everyday Moments. As an
African-American
feminist theologian, she speaks for a sector of society that is
frequently
invisible. Her websiteisirenemonroe.com. Click here to contact
the Rev.
Monroe.

e-Mail re-print notice

If you send
us an emaill message we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell
us it is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold
your name.