It does now list the current members. It didn't when I wrote the article. Thinking some anon troll would come up with this after it was subsequently changed, I saved the source code and also took a .jpg screengrab. I'll send them to ICANNWatch for hosting and link to them if they'll do that. The page also now asserts that it was last updated April 22, 2002, the same day the committee was last changed. That is as false as just about everything else ICANN generates.

However, let us imagine that the link (which I linked to, you didn't, who is it who has an inability to use the web? here it is again) was accurate. According to your assertion that must logically mean that everything else I say is also wrong and that, for example, ICANN really has ratified and published its BoD meeting minutes in a timely fashion. Perhaps you could help me out and point to where they are hidden in plain site (I take it that was a pun)? -g

Thx. Richard. Few could match ICANN's track record of deceit, obfuscation, opaque dealings, and broken promises, so I don't bother to try. :) To be clear, ICANN didn't insert a new link, the anon responder is describing the same link I gave in the original article and again in my response to him, and for good measure here. What someone at ICANN did do is update the page that that link leads to after my article was published. They also inserted a date to make it appear that it was done months ago. Perhaps they then came over here and made that anonymous post. So if they'll so readily be misleading on such a minor issue, one wonders about the accuracy of the records Karl may yet get to access. -g