I don't blame the media for covering anything they want to personally. I blame the people who are ignorant enough to believe everything they hear about without doing proper research and then becoming opiniated based on it.

For instance, I heard someone today at school trying to convince someone else that Obama had built a mosque on top of the twin towers wreckage. I mean really. I don't know where people here these things, but if you take rumors and media as facts then you are extremely irresponsible.

Wow that is ridiculous. And I wish the same thing that people didnt take the news seriously all the time. I read what's in the paper and thats about it. Maybe whatever ends up on my phone as Latest News.

Voice of Justice (Radio Iran) is always an alternate take on the MSM's "stories;" they're still covering the Occupy Movement, for example. I listen on 13650 or 11920 when I happen to be awake at 11:30 PM...

Of course there’s stories that should be covered in the news, and yet they never are. Everyone knows (even you liberals out there) that the media is biased towards the left in almost all scenarios. For example, when Todd Akin made his idiotic comments about r.a.p.e every major news station was all over it, but when it was revealed that the ATF let guns be sold to Mexican drug cartels, CNN, NBC, ABC, and all the rest of them didn’t want to touch it.

US empiret is the area of the world that is under the indirect control of the US government (NATO, the non CAN Latin American Countries, Iraq, Isreal, the Gulf Monarchies, Lybia, The Northern Alliance, Canada, Mexico ETC)

all mainstream media sources are owned by large corporations that have interests staked on the status quo (capitalism, empire, racism, poverty, prison slavery, wars of aggression, homelessness, wage slavery, ETC)

US empiret is the area of the world that is under the indirect control of the US government (NATO, the non CAN Latin American Countries, Iraq, Isreal, the Gulf Monarchies, Lybia, The Northern Alliance, Canada, Mexico ETC)

all mainstream media sources are owned by large corporations that have interests staked on the status quo (capitalism, empire, racism, poverty, prison slavery, wars of aggression, homelessness, wage slavery, ETC)

I can tell you for certain human6 that the U.S. has no control, indirect or otherwise, over Iraq, Israel, Canada, Mexico, NATO, or any other countries/organizations that you named. The United States may have influence in some of these areas, but they certainly don’t control them. There’s a big difference.

Also, while I do agree that most major news outlets are owned by large companies, I disagree that they’re always interested in protecting the status quo. After all, what do you think “investigative” journalism is?

Alright, some of that I agree with, some I don’t. Let’s get back to whole reason for this forum. News reporters. I’ll say the same thing that I said before. In the United States, the mainstream media is (for the most part) biased towards liberalism and leftists. That's the truth of it.

I already told you about the ATF gunwalking scandal. Then there’s the media crying that Mitt Romney messed up when he spoke about the embassy attacks, not covering Obama’s refusing to meet with the Israeli Prime Minister, and not even turning their heads when Obama stated that he has no idea what our national debt is. The list goes on and on.