Friday, May 29, 2015

just finding its legs, has not
always provided consistent or sufficient guidance to providers, particularly to
those early adopters with visits prior to 2016…[W]hat CAEP has provided up to
now has not been sufficient. In the words of our Standards Commission,

The
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation has weathered
more than its fair share of turbulence in its few years in existence,
perhaps the inevitable result of its origins (a merger between two
unequal and competing accreditors) and its mission (tougher standards in
a field long criticized for settling for lesser ones). That the
organization has accomplished what it has, let alone survived at all, is
arguably a victory.

Its founding leader, James Cibulka, wasn't so fortunate. He was
dismissed this month. The accreditor noted Cibulka's departure with one
line in a news release
about his interim successor, and its board chair repeatedly declined in
an interview to say anything of substance about why Cibulka is leaving,
except to imply that he may have been the right person to build the
organization but not to lead it.

"What's important is the future of CAEP, not the past," said Mary
Brabeck, professor and dean emerita of New York University's Steinhardt
School of Culture, Education and Human Development, while parrying
questions about Cibulka's abrupt departure.

But the past matters if patterns revealed by it may influence the
future, and that's what some observers of the situation say is the case
here.

In pushing a reform-minded agenda, the accreditor has long stirred
criticism from the main organization representing teacher ed programs
(the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education) and from
unions that represent teachers, even as they have formally endorsed its
existence and mission.

In February, the board of AACTE approved a sweeping resolution
expressing a "crisis of confidence" in the accreditor and many aspects
of its work. The resolution reiterated the professional group's support
for the idea of a single national accreditor and for CAEP in particular,
but expressed concern about the group's standards, processes and
governance structure, among other things.

Cibulka's ouster came about two months later, over the strongly
worded objections of most of the accreditor's staff. And while Brabeck
says the lobbying group's resolution had "nothing to do" with the CAEP
board's decision to change leaders, some familiar with the situation
question that assertion.

Jane Leibbrand was a vice president at the National Council for the
Accreditation of Teacher Education, the larger of the accreditors that
merged to create CAEP. She attributes the leadership change primarily to
CAEP's struggles to merge the two organizations into one and to
communicate about, and put into operation, the new, tougher standards to
which it will hold teacher education programs.

But she and others say those who have opposed the new accreditor's
push for tougher standards -- especially for more stringent academic
standards for students admitted to teacher education programs -- almost
certainly seized on concerns over operational issues to push out the
primary architect of those changes.

"Jim had a vision that involved change," Leibbrand said. "That is
difficult, and more difficult for some institutions than others."

Battles in the Background

Cibulka did not respond to several requests to comment for this
article. Several other people who might have shed light on the reasons
for his ouster -- including other members of CAEP's board and several of
its employees -- also declined to talk publicly, referring questions to
Brabeck.

But the tension-filled history of CAEP's emergence is well
documented. Teachers' colleges have for two decades been a constant (and
they would argue unjustified) target of critics of the American K-12
system, who say the schools do not adequately prepare teachers for the
classroom. The pages of Inside Higher Ed and, even more, publications like Education Week,
are filled with reports and critiques of teacher education program. And
more than five years ago, various parties reached agreement on creating
a new single national accreditor to try to push, and lift, the programs
to strive for more. Under the arrangement, the National Council for
Accreditation in Teacher Education, the traditional accreditor, merged
with the much smaller Teacher Education Accreditation Council to form
CAEP.

Cibulka, who had been NCATE's president and before that dean of the
College of Education at the University of Kentucky, became CAEP's
leader, and over the next three years, the field -- amid much debate and
often disagreement -- coalesced around a set of standards that required
colleges to provide evidence that their own students are academically
solid and that they are effective once they become teachers. The
evidence-based approach was consistent with what reformers (and many
politicians, including several in the Obama administration) have wanted.

Political flare-ups occurred over a perception that Cibulka and, by
extension, CAEP had been overly supportive of the Obama administration’s
proposals to change how teacher education programs were judged for
federal purposes. Many college leaders (and education faculty unions)
complained that the tougher admissions standards CAEP sought for
education students would keep would-be teachers who are members of
minority groups out of the teaching profession. Teachers’ colleges and
faculty unions rarely complained openly about the tougher standards;
given public sentiment about the quality of the K-12 system, public
statements suggesting that they were against more rigor would not have
played well.

But complaints were plentiful about whether CAEP was up to the task
of implementing the new standards, and that became the focus of the case
against Cibulka.

‘More Intense’ Worries

The AACTE board’s resolution included a laundry list of concerns that
created what it called a “crisis of confidence” in Cibulka and CAEP.
“As CAEP becomes more operational, worries become more intense,” said
Sharon Robinson, AACTE’s president and CEO.

“Our board felt most urgently about making sure they were respectful of
member concerns,” Robinson said. “That was our motivation to put forward
the resolution. It was an effort to really reflect member concerns.”

Leibbrand, the former NCATE official, said that at times CAEP
officials seemed overmatched by the demands of implementing the
standards and explaining them to administrators and professors at the
schools that would be judged by them. She described conference sessions
at which CAEP officials were unable to answer questions about the
expectations schools would be facing, and a delay in producing the
manual designed to guide the accredited through the process.

“When that happened, it starts a dynamic,” she said. “When staff
weren’t able to answer questions satisfactorily, it didn’t promote a
feeling of confidence.”

But she and others said the “biggest factor” in unhappiness with CAEP
and Cibulka was ultimately that “you had a radical change in
accreditation standards, and it required new behavior on the part of
institutions.”

On April 1, between the time of the AACTE resolution and Cibulka's
ouster, about two-thirds of CAEP employees wrote the board what they
called "the strongest possible letter of support"
for Cibulka. They acknowledged that, as in "all transitions, the road
has not always been smooth," marked by "mistakes and missteps." But the
letter -- signed by 25 of roughly 35 employees -- was designed to signal
the "unwavering support of his staff": "We are all committed to CAEP's
mission and wholeheartedly support the leadership of Jim Cibulka."

But in early May, about two months after the AACTE board’s
resolution, CAEP’s board announced that Cibulka was out and would be
replaced on an interim basis by Christopher Koch, former Illinois state
superintendent of education and vice chair of the CAEP board. The only
mention of Cibulka was that he would be replaced by Koch -- his five
years of work to build the organization received no mention.

Robinson said she and AACTE played no role in encouraging CAEP to get
rid of Cibulka. And in an interview, Brabeck, the CAEP board chair,
denied any link between the unhappiness reflected by the AACTE
resolution and the decision to dump Cibulka.

She credited Cibulka with launching CAEP and bringing the field
together around the accreditation standards. “The country owes Jim a lot
of credit for getting us to the moment we’re in,” she said.

But “bringing together the two organizations” to “form the best
single accreditor is still a work in progress,” she said. “I don’t
believe there’s a man for all seasons,” she added.

She dismissed the notion that AACTE’s displeasure with Cibulka and
CAEP reflected discomfort with the tougher standards. “I take AACTE at
its word when it says they are 100 percent behind the standards,”
Brabeck said. She said she took Robinson at her word that they are
committed to CAEP, too.

"What's important now is the future of CAEP, that we have a leader in
place who’s committed to the standards…. The future is about the kids in
our schools. That’s what CAEP is trying to affect.”

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

I don't have comparative data, but the number of
contracts issued to outside agencies to do work for the Fayette County Schools
during the Shelton administration felt excessive. Perhaps that was because the
nature of such contracts seemed to change as well. Got a problem with the
personnel in your financial services division? Hire a consultant. Get a bad
report from the State Auditor? Hire a consultant. The repetitive nature of the
outsourcing left one to wonder if the FCPS district office lacked the capacity
to run it's own shop.

It apparently became normal business for FCPS to
contract with civic non-profits to provide services that are more typically
thought to be volunteer work. As I recall, Junior Achievement was one such
group. Volunteers would come to class and share experiences and information
with students about the our economic system, work readiness, financial
literacy, and entrepreneurship. But these days the district pays Junior
Achievement - we hear, $22,000 per year - to send volunteers. What's up with
that?

Today it was reported that another non-profit, United
Way of the Bluegrass, apparently re-thought their arrangement, and decided to
return $25,000 to the district. Good for them. The contract was reportedly
signed by Shelton on his last day in office, and bypassed the board because the
item came out of the Superintendent's budget, and was below the allowable
limit. And what a contract it was. Written in aspirational terms, the
year-long agreement called for United Way and FCPS to pilot an effort to
"improve the way the district uses limited resources to improve student
outcomes."

"To charge the school district to help
the worst-rated elementary school in the Commonwealth was not something
we wanted to do,"

-- United Way of the Bluegrass CEO Bill Farmer

"We are currently classified as the lowest performing school
in the state, but we do not intend to stay there," William Wells Brown
Elementary principal Jay Jones Jr. told the Fayette County Public
Schools board recently.

Flanked by a team of specialists from the district who are helping, Jones presented his plan to improve student achievement.

In
a new initiative since statewide test scores were released in October,
some principals of low performing schools in Fayette County are asked to
appear at board meetings to share their improvement plans.

But the presentations aren't blame sessions.
"The
public needs to understand the challenges you face and how proactive
you've been in addressing those needs," school board chairman John Price
told Jones at a March meeting. "It takes time for these things to
happen."

Price told Jones he wanted more information on what William Wells Brown needed.

"The board needs to better understand the needs that you have so we can try to build a budget," Price said.

With
the board set to approve a tentative budget Tuesday, Price said this
week that the 2015-16 budget has very little money to help William Wells
Brown and other low performing schools. He said the board was looking
for more money in the 2016-17 budget.

Acting Superintendent
Marlene Helm has said it's possible the district will be able to address
some of William Wells Brown's needs with federal money.

In terms
of demographics, 96 percent of the school's students receive free or
reduced-price lunch. About two-thirds of the students are black and 12
percent Hispanic.

With a score of 34.4 out of 100, William Wells
Brown Elementary was the lowest rated among elementary schools statewide
in Kentucky's testing and accountability program in 2013-14.
It
is classified by the state as "needs improvement" as opposed to
"proficient" or "distinguished." William Wells Brown also is classified
as a "focus" school, meaning that it is underperforming in closing the
achievement gaps between poor, minority and disabled students and other
students.
The school's plan for moving to proficient includes
Jones working closely with a mentor provided by the school district — a
retired principal — and with the district's elementary director.

Jones
is focusing on improving teacher and principal effectiveness, trying to
increase the school's engagement with families and the community, and
on creating a safe learning environment.

Jones is trying to
increase the number of students who are prepared for kindergarten with
two full-day preschool classes in the fall of 2015. He is trying to
increase minority hiring, and to better monitor daily instruction.
Students are getting instruction in small groups and teachers are
getting more professional development.

A new reading program has been purchased for the school.

"I
believe I have the hardest working staff in the district. They come in
early. They stay late and are always going above and beyond to meet the
needs of students," Jones said.

Officials from Fayette County's
16th district PTA, an organization that provides support to individual
school PTAs, have been helping to train parents in the William Wells
Brown PTA.

A service team from the district has been helping with
community engagement, with lesson planning, testing, data analysis,
monitoring special education services and with a school-wide behavior
plan.
Data analysis is the foundation on which school officials
monitor how well students are learning and what kind of classwork they
need.

Academic data is analyzed twice weekly by teachers and an
instructional leadership team. Data is also analyzed at the school's
monthly decision-making council meetings.

Regular classroom test results are monitored, and instructional coaches work with teachers if scores drop.

Behavior
data is examined, including data on students who get sent to the
principal's office for infractions. Incidents are analyzed by teacher,
location, time of day, day of week, type of infraction, grade level,
gender, and ethnicity.

Out-of-school suspensions have decreased by 57 percent.

"Kids are struggling academically so it doesn't make sense to send them home," the principal said.

Instead the school is trying after-school detention.

While
test scores are important, Jones said he also looks for steady
progress, academically and socially, as indicators of a student's
success.

Jones said he was pleased with the support he had
received from district officials, but he told the school board he needed
a new program to help students with math, more training for staff and
more staff members.

The school district gave the United Way of the
Bluegrass a $25,000 contract to work with the district's office of
Family and Community Engagement to recruit, train, and place volunteers
at the school. But Acting Superintendent Marlene Helm said United Way
officials recently returned payment they had received from the district,
saying United Way officials had determined they could help the district
without receiving money.

"To charge the school district to help
the worst-rated elementary school in the Commonwealth was not something
we wanted to do," United Way of the Bluegrass CEO Bill Farmer told the
Herald-Leader Friday.

Farmer said that while there was a cost
associated with the work, "we felt it was more important to provide the
services than to be paid."

Farmer said the United Way also wanted
to help the other elementary schools in Fayette County that are
classified by the state as "needs improvement."

Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican and 2016 presidential candidate, talked education during an interview Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press,
during which he said that he's not against national testing, despite
his anti-federal-meddling attitude. Though to be sure, he's still very
much opposed to a national curriculum.

The interview largely focused on foreign affairs issues, but crept
into the edu-world when host Chuck Todd asked Paul about an idea in his
book, Taking a Stand: Moving Beyond Partisan Politics to Unite America.

The idea, loosely explained, is that a superb teacher should be
teaching millions of students via online classes, not 20 to 30 students
in a small classroom.

Here's the idea explained in Paul's own words:

"One of the big leaps forward for America was when we started
becoming a meritocracy and everybody was open for education. There's
still some people in America, but particularly in other countries, who
are trapped in poverty and don't have access. When the Internet expands
this access and someone in the recesses of the jungle can learn from the
best calculus teacher on the planet, we're going to discover a genius
who will allow progress and mankind to improve, and I think it's going
to be a huge leap for technological progress. But it's by having larger
classrooms, which is counterintuitive, not smaller. They will be virtual
classrooms, and they will be extraordinarily cheap."

Specifically, Todd pushed Paul to explain why this idea of having one
teacher teaching an entire nation— a teacher who presumably creates his
or her own curriculum—is different than a national curriculum, which
Paul explains in his book that he opposes.

"How is that not in contradiction to being against the Common Core
[State Standards], but for nationalized teaching, like what you
describe?" Todd asked.

Paul's libertarian ideals plant him firmly in the "get government out
of my life" camp—in fact, if he had his way, he'd abolish the entire
U.S. Department of Education—so the question was meant as a bit of a
gotcha. (And, side note, the common core is a set of standards—not a
curriculum, as it's often characterized by those who oppose it.)

"I'm not saying this comes from government," Paul said in response to
Todd's question. "I think this comes more than likely from the
innovators you meet in Silicon Valley or the innovators you meet in
Austin, Texas."

When Todd pushed back, saying that it doesn't sound like the local
government mantra he's so fond of, Paul clarified: "I'm not arguing
against any kind of national communication or even national testing. I
took national tests when I was a kid," Paul continued. "What I'm arguing
against is centralized control in one body of the government."

That education made it into the 10-minute interview at all is a big
deal, and bodes well for education being a major issue in the 2016
election cycle, especially debate over the ever divisive common-core standards.

Well, we know Angela Allen is not bigoted, closed-minded, or against things that are not like her, because she told us so.

Angela Allen

But I'm still confused about just what it is that upset an otherwise intelligent-sounding member of the Danville community, to the point that she felt compelled to leave a baccalaureate service, in anger, because a Muslim student exercised her first amendment right to religious expression as a citizen of the United States, to read and chant a passage from the Quran. Allen says she is not particularly religious herself. Is she anti-American, or opposed to civil rights somehow?

Other students at the ceremony offered religious expressions to the same God. But Allen specifically doesn't care to be swayed by that logic. "To tell me that I need to be educated and need to understand that both
sides are worshiping the same God is futile — tell the two sides, not
me," Allen writes.

Her explanation for her anger relates to a perceived assault on tradition. She explains that a baccalaureate service is "a Traditional Christian event dating back to the 1400s" and objected to the travesty of evolving tradition occurring before the audience of - not a religious event - but "a Christian event in the Bible Belt."

She's not bigoted, she says, but suggests that Danville High School folks should have known better than to try such a thing around here. Then Allen issued a challenge. "Want to take me on about my objection to the cancer of political
correctness? To how weak it makes us individually and collectively? THEN
BRING IT ON!"

Interesting challenge.

Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that Allen is correct, and that our precious traditions must be protected from outside forces that threaten to break down society as we know it - all in the name of political correctness, or diversity.

If Allen is correct, then our precious fifteenth century English traditions would still hold that...

she must be silenced immediately, and chastened against the chance that she might repeat her offense of offering her opinions into the matters reserved to men

by virtue of her inferior sex, her husband, father, uncles, or other responsible men in her family should take her in hand, or risk punishment themselves

she is not an individual under the law and has no rights; she is chattel, submissive and subject to her husband; she can be bought and sold

being more carnal than man, defective in formation from the outset, the bent rib...she is an imperfect animal, she always deceives, and therefore should not be listened to

she is a foe to friendship, a necessary evil, a natural temptation, and the source of all carnal lust, which, in a woman is insatiable, and from which witchcraft derives

she is not accorded any civil rights, is not allowed to appear in court, unless on behalf of, and at the behest of, her husband

If Allen is correct, we have been made weaker as a nation for our toleration of women in political discourse, and we should all regret allowing the inferior sex to vote.

You get the point. I like traditions as well as the next guy. But, I like civil rights more.

An event meant to honor the diverse beliefs of the 2015 graduates of Danville High School has instead caused a rift to develop among adults in the community — some with no children in school.

“We wanted to
represent all diversity,” said Virginia Bugg. “The goal of the
baccalaureate — as parents in this community, we are here to support
them in their faith, whatever that may be, to raise them up to be good
citizens of the United States.”

This year, the program included
words from students of various beliefs, including atheism, Christianity
and Islam, as well as a speech from Lee Jefferson, assistant professor
of religion at Centre College, and music from the men’s choir of First
Baptist Church, Second and Walnut streets, and from a hispanic student
at the school.

The baccalaureate service, held
Sunday night, is a yearly event connected to the festivities for
graduating seniors and, at Danville High School, is initiated by parents
and seniors.

However, it was the words spoken by a 17-year-old graduating senior that have created the most buzz.

The senior is of the Muslim faith
and, true to her faith, chose to read for her classmates a passage from
the Quran in both Arabic and English, an excerpt which says, “In the
name of God, the infinitely compassionate and merciful. Praise be to
God, Lord of all the worlds. The compassionate, the merciful. Ruler on
the day of reckoning. You alone we do worship, and you alone we do ask
for help. Guide us on the straight path, the path of those who have
received your grace; not the path of those who have brought down wrath,
nor of those who wonder astray.”

Those words caused one set of parents to leave the service and write a blog post denouncing it. Angela Allen, writer at www.wickedblog.com, was there with her family and recorded the event online.

“I honestly can’t describe the
anger that rose in me,” Allen wrote in her blog. She and those she was
with left the event early, waiting outside until it was over.

Allen writes in her blog that she is not a particularly religious person, but that her issue with it is the tradition involved.

“I’m not a bigot, closed-minded
or against everything that’s not like me. I’m neither a religious nut of
any flavor, nor am I in alignment with many who would spew hate from
the other side of the fence,” she writes. “What I am totally against is
this ‘politically correct’ society that continually tramples the
traditions of others in the name of open-mindedness and progressiveness.

“If our differences are what make us wonderful — and they are — then quit trying to homogenize my world.”

Allen said her issue with the program was that it went against the traditions of the baccalaureate service.

According to Merriam-Webster’s
dictionary, the baccalaureate dates to medieval times, roughly 1649, as a
service when a sermon was delivered. Dictionary.com
goes on to explain that it was the 1600s when the word was coined;
however, the more modern meaning arose about 1864 when it became a
“religious farewell address to the graduating class.”

In recent years, the meaning has continued to transform, with some schools taking the religious context out entirely.

At Danville High School,
participants in the baccalaureate have transformed it over the years to
be an interfaith service, one that is dedicated to the diversity of the
student population.

It has been held at the school
for the past several years; however, it is not a school-sanctioned
function. The committee that arranges the baccalaureate consists of
parents who are also in on the planning for Project Graduation.

Bugg, who was one of the parents
on that committee, was shocked at the reactions from the community,
especially from individuals who were made aware of the nature of the
baccalaureate service.

“Everyone got emails — all
parents got it. If anyone had a problem with it, they needed to come be a
part of our committee,” she said.

Invitations were sent out to
parents, which said, “The event will consist of speeches, readings and
music that contain both secular and religious components that reflect
our diverse student body.”

Three years ago, the older
brother of the young student spoke, also sharing his Muslim beliefs. No
issues were raised then, according to their parents, but now they fear
for their daughter, who has been the brunt of negative statements from
community members. Her peers have celebrated her in speaking, they said.

Their faith is one of peace, not the extremism so widely displayed on mainstream media, they said.

“Trying to represent all of the
students is a great aim,” said Jaemi Loeb. Loeb, an assistant professor
of music at Centre College, is of the Jewish faith. She has a close
friend who's child is a junior at the high school. “If people have a
problem with other beliefs, then we have problems. Danville is
relatively diverse.”

No students are required to attend baccalaureate, and some chose not to.

“It was totally optional. Only about 40 or 50 people came,” Bugg said.

While the event was not a
school-run event, Danville Independent Schools issued a statement Monday
evening in support of the diversity shown at the baccalaureate.

“At the event, words of hope,
acceptance, well wishes, and joy emanated from a diverse set of
presenters, which included a student of Muslim faith, the men’s choir of
the First Baptist Church, a parent, and a professor of religion from
Centre College.

“Though neither the Board of
Education nor the school district organize or sponsor baccalaureate
services, we take this opportunity to express our congratulations to the
wonderful diversity of students that compose this year’s graduating
class, like many before and many more to come. In the Danville Schools,
all means all…”

Keith Look, superintendent, said
he was in the buildings on Monday, partially to see if there were any
problems aligning with the community firestorm buzzing on social media.

“Every place was a happy, functioning center of education,” he said.

DHS Principal Aaron Etherington said he was proud.

“We have so many at Danville High
School that represent diversity with high regard. I’m proud of our
senior class and all the individuals in the class,” Etherington said.

KSN&C

KSN&C

KSN&C is intended to be a place for well-reasoned civil discourse...not to suggest that we don’t appreciate the witty retort or pithy observation. Have at it. But we do not invite the anonymous flaming too often found in social media these days. This is a destination for folks to state your name and speak your piece.

It is important to note that, while the Moderator serves as Faculty Regent for Eastern Kentucky University, all comments offered by the Moderator on KSN&C are his own opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of the Board of Regents, the university administration, faculty, or any members of the university community.

On KSN&C, all authors are responsible for their own comments. See full disclaimer at the bottom of the page.

Why This Blog?

So far as we know, we only get one lifetime. So, when I "retired" in 2004, after 31-years in public education I wanted to do something different. I wanted to teach, write and become a student again. I have since spent a decade in higher ed.

I have listened to so many commentaries over the years about what should be done to improve Kentucky's schools - written largely by folks who have never tried to manage a classroom, run a school, or close an achievement gap. I came to believe that I might have something to offer.

I moved, in 1985, from suburban northern Kentucky to what was then the state’s flagship district - Fayette County. I have had a unique set of experiences to accompany my journey through KERA’s implementation. I have seen children grow to graduate and lead successful lives. I have seen them go to jail and I have seen them die. I have been amazed by brilliant teachers, dismayed by impassive bureaucrats, disappointed by politicians and uplifted by some of Kentucky’s finest school children. When I am not complaining about it, I will attest that public school administration is critically important work.

Democracy is run by those who show up. In our system of government every citizen has a voice, but only if they choose to use it.

This blog is totally independent; not supported or sponsored by any institution or political organization. I will make every effort to fully cite (or link to) my sources. Please address any concerns to the author.

On the campaign trail...with my wife Rita

An action shot: The Principal...as a much younger man.

Faculty Senate Chair

Serving as Mace Bearer during the Inauguration of Michael T. Benson as EKU's 12th president.

Teaching

EDF 203 in EKU's one-room schoolhouse.

Professin'

Lecturing on the history of Berea College to Berea faculty and staff, 2014.

Faculty Regent

One in a long series of meetings. 2016

KSN&C StatCounter

Disclaimer:

By accessing this website (http://theprincipal.blogspot.com) Kentucky School News and Commentary (hereafter KSN&C), a web browser (hereafter user) consents that she or he is familiar with, understands and absolutely accepts the following weblog disclaimer:

The views expressed by the authors and contributors on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of Kentucky School News and Commentary, those who link to this website, the author’s employers, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, other ancestors, blood-relatives, progeny, this website’s web host, moderator, designer, or any other organization in any way connected with this website.

While I presently serve as Chair of the Eastern Kentucky University Faculty Senate (August 2014-May 2016), none of the Moderator's comments are official statements attributable to EKU, its Faculty Senate or any of the institution's entities.

In all cases, comments are the personal views of the author. No individual contributor, author or commenter is paid for their opinion or beholden to a particular point of view. All contributors write in the English language and cannot be held responsible for unfortunate translations that may occur in other languages. KSN&C is not responsible for human errors involving grammar and punctuation.

Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of the author. The author assumes full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that may result from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. The content on the blog is not intended to malign any religious, ethnic group, club, organization, company or individual. Readers are advised to employ a healthy dose of rationality. Furthermore, information is always in transition. Web links change, and content published today may be out-of-date next week.

Readers are advised that some images used on the site are not the property of KSN&C but are reduced in size and used under fair-use. The same is true of certain copyrighted material. Any concerns should be addressed to the moderator. Due to the episodic nature of the blog, errors, when pointed out, may not be immediately corrected.

All trademarks, service marks, copyrights, registered names, mottos, logos, insignias and marks used or cited by this website are the property of their respective owners and this website in no way accepts any responsibility for an infringement on any of the above.

Despite any claims to the contrary, nothing on this website should be construed as professional advice. The information provided on this website is of a general, wide-ranging nature and cannot substitute for the advice of a licensed legal professional, physician, psychiatrist or member of the clergy. A competent authority with specialized knowledge operating within the Kentucky Department of Education, local public school district, church school, independent private school, home school, or in the journalistic, law enforcement or legal community is the only one who can address or comment on the specific circumstances covered in the news and commented upon herein. For personal advice, please contact your mother, father, BFF, local bar association, local bar tender, law society, medical board, county hospital, pastor, teacher, phone book, online directory, local emergency number in your jurisdiction, or Google to find a or obtain a referral to a competent professional.

This website has no control over the information you access via outbound link(s) in the post text, sidebar, header, footer or comment sections. This website does not endorse linked websites and cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information found by following said links or the correctness of any analysis found therein and should not be held responsible for it or the consequences of a user’s use of that information. In fact, we’re pretty sure we link to falsehoods perpetrated by others with some frequency. Be warned. Twistifications of supposed facts, biased reporting, and bad analysis is de rigueur for some of the sites we link.

This website may inadvertently link to content that is vacuous, obscene, venomous, frivolous, rotten, antagonistic, harsh, rancorous, acrimonious or repetitive. This website in no way condones, endorses or takes responsibility for such content. Please report anything really ugly to KSN&C’s Moderator.

This website publishes content regularly and said content is maintained in reference to the protections afforded it under local, state, martial, federal, international and school yard law. Publication of information found on this website may be in violation of the laws of the city, county, state, country or other jurisdiction from where you are viewing this website’s content and laws in your jurisdiction may not protect or allow the same kinds of speech or distribution. In the case that the laws of the jurisdiction where this website's content is maintained and those of yours conflict, this website does not encourage, condone, facilitate, recommend or protect the violation of any laws and cannot be responsible for any violations of such laws. We do condone lawful efforts to extend free speech protections to all parts of the world.

Because the World Wide Web is an integrated net of communication, discussion and litigation, this website encourages the distribution of its content. Cross, reciprocal or just plain friendly hyper-linking is consistent with this information sharing and this disclaimer should not be construed as a condemnation of any linking practices. That said, any reproduction of this website’s content must credit the website by name and Uniform Resource Locator (URL). Should you link to this domain or use, reproduce, republish, reiterate, imitate, or duplicate the information contained on this website, you alone are responsible for that action and should, under threat of litigation, credit this website by name and URL. In addition, any user who learns of information from this site, but traces back to our attributed sources in an effort to forego proper mention of KSN&C should seek therapy.

This website is not recommended for inmates, ingrates, illiterates, or anyone professing an irrational fear of CATS or any other mammal, or those who have a penchant for bullying or self- aggrandizement. Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant or are nursing are advised to consult their physician before reading this website. Eating before reading may result in indigestion. This website contains small pieces and is not recommended for children under the age of 4.