Sigh.. I know this is a waste of time, but what was the lie? And how material to ANYTHING was the so-called lie? Did the so-called lie change the way the US responded to the attack? Did the so-called lie change any factual piece of information so that people could not determine that the 4 US citizens were dead and they were killed by Islamic Fundamentalists? Did the so-called lie stop any of the investigations into why the tragedy occurred? Again, what was the material impact of the so-called lie?

Now that his presidency is entering its final act, Obama's got to be feeling a certain amount of relief that we will now be easing into the era when everything is Hillary Clinton's fault instead of his.

Except for the fact that I can't think of any stronger candidate, and that the democrats are not clever enough to pull off that level of Jedi mind trick, I would have some hope Hillary would turn out to be a stalking horse.

Not surprising she's at fault- look at how she's lied about Benghazi!!Yes, they did.

But you only care about murdered people when the president has an "R" after his name.

Lies and projections. Thus, why you're favorited!ed.

For the record, most people cared as much about Benghazi as about the 10 embassy attacks under GWB's watch. That is, none. You didn't see one Democrat ask that Bush or Rice be impeached over Karachi. In fact, you probably didn't know the US embassy in Karachi was bombed and 2 people died in 2006 until you read this post.

IlGreven:You didn't see one Democrat ask that Bush or Rice be impeached over Karachi.

How can you even compare the two?

I mean, Obama and Bush. Total false equivalence.

If God sends famine and pestilence and war, it because he's a just God. When Satan does it, it's because he's evil. You don't say "oh, hey, famine and pestilence and war happen either way, so good is now the same as evil!"

Sigh.. I know this is a waste of time, but what was the lie? And how material to ANYTHING was the so-called lie? Did the so-called lie change the way the US responded to the attack? Did the so-called lie change any factual piece of information so that people could not determine that the 4 US citizens were dead and they were killed by Islamic Fundamentalists? Did the so-called lie stop any of the investigations into why the tragedy occurred? Again, what was the material impact of the so-called lie?

Too bad libulardos, OnlyM3 doesn't have to respond because he has already won this thread. Deal with it.

Not surprising she's at fault- look at how she's lied about Benghazi!!Yes, they did.

But you only care about murdered people when the president has an "R" after his name.

The quality of trolls around here has really gone downhill. Big time.I miss Gato_negro and all his alts.

I haven't seen Canis_Noir nor Bevets in a while.

BlackDog's still around, but I wouldn't really call him a troll. I almost always disagree with him, but his reasoning is usually pretty sound. We just make different starting assumptions. Bevets is, I think, long gone. He was a true believer though, not really a troll.

Wow. They were never particularly good at hiding their partisan bias before, because even way back when I was a conservative republican (I got better) I knew they were just telling me what I wanted to hear; I didn't care because, well, it was what I wanted to hear back then. But is it just me or is Fox News just not even trying to hide said bias anymore? It seems like they're just letting it all hang out now. Do they still advertise themselves as "fair and balanced?" I haven't watched them in years.

sendtodave:IlGreven: You didn't see one Democrat ask that Bush or Rice be impeached over Karachi.

How can you even compare the two?

I mean, Obama and Bush. Total false equivalence.

If God sends famine and pestilence and war, it because he's a just God. When Satan does it, it's because he's evil. You don't say "oh, hey, famine and pestilence and war happen either way, so good is now the same as evil!"

That would be absurd.

Bush is not the same as Obevil.

Obevil said to the farmer,You better sell your old machines.When I get through with your cotton,you can't even buy gasoline.

WraithSama:Wow. They were never particularly good at hiding their partisan bias before, because even way back when I was a conservative republican (I got better) I knew they were just telling me what I wanted to hear; I didn't care because, well, it was what I wanted to hear back then. But is it just me or is Fox News just not even trying to hide said bias anymore? It seems like they're just letting it all hang out now. Do they still advertise themselves as "fair and balanced?" I haven't watched them in years.

I think it's worse.

It's one thing to be horribly biased; it's another to be farking retarded and insane.

Step one was continuing to pretend Benghazi is a big deal. Now they'll tie this to Hillary if they can (even though she no longer is Secretary of State) in the continuing Fox campaign against Hillary 2016.

Seriously, with all Fox does to campaign for republicans, the airtime should count as direct campaign contributions to the RNC.

Iczer:So, wait... By not "officially" labeling Boko a foreign terrorist organization, they somehow grew testicles and started kidnapping people because they're currently not "terrorists"...?

I think I feel my brain leaking out of my nose, although that could just be part of the cold I've got...

You have to remember, these are the same people who argue that gun control laws will not stop criminals from getting gunz, therefore we should not have any (although apparently laws against abortion will prevent all abortions forever and ever amen).

Making political points on the backs of kidnapped girls being sold as rape-slaves is possibly lower than making political points on the bodies of dead Americans; they just haven't been caught smirking over it this time.

Iczer:So, wait... By not "officially" labeling Boko a foreign terrorist organization, they somehow grew testicles and started kidnapping people because they're currently not "terrorists"...?

I think I feel my brain leaking out of my nose, although that could just be part of the cold I've got...

By not labeling them terrorists, it gave them the confidence to know that the US wouldn't do anything to prevent whatever terrorist actions they had planned to do. Also, by not solving the Benghazi crisis and actively hunting the people responsible and put them in jail, it has given them the co fidence to know the US wouldn't do anything to them after whatever terrorist action they had planned. They would be confidence free. Can't you see how this is entirely 100% Clinton's fault now?

Also, by not doing anything in Benghazi and Syria, we gave Russia the confidence to attack Ukraine. And by only sanctioning Russia now, we are letting the terrorists and dictators or the world know that we won't do anything to them, except sanctions. Of course, if we were even thinking of doing anything in Syria, Obama would rightly be called a warmonger. Just like he's a warmonger now for letting Russia take over Ukraine (Romney and Palin were right!).

Hopefully now you understand why Obama and Clinton are bad for foreign policy and bad for domestic policy. Clearly, neither of these limp-wristed weakling fascists should be leading this great nation of ours. We deserve a strong leader. Like Putin.