Spectacular disgorgement in NTI v Canada

Where a defendant has made a profit from a civil wrong such as a breach of contract or a tort, damages can be directed to stripping the profit from the defendant. For example, in Hickey v Roches Stores (High Court, unreported, 14 July 1976) (pdf) Finlay P held

Where a wrongdoer has calculated and intended by his wrongdoing to achieve a gain or profit which he could not otherwise achieve and has in that way acted mala fide then irrespective of whether the form of his wrongdoing constitutes a tort or a breach of contract the Court should in assessing damages look not only to the loss suffered by the injured party but also to the profit or gain unjustly or wrongly obtained by the wrongdoer.

There are some dicta in Canada in favour of this measure. For example, in Bank of America (Canada) v Mutual Trust Co[2002] 2 SCR 601, 2002 SCC 43 (CanLII) (26 April 2002) Major J observed “Restitution damages, which are infrequently employed, focus on the advantage gained by the defendant as a result of his or her breach of contract” (at para [25]). Now, this measure has been spectacularly applied in a first instance judgment in Canada:

In this important case Justice Earl Johnson in the Nunavut Court of Justice has granted summary judgement against Canada in the amount of $14,817,500 for breach of Article 12.7.6 of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement (NLCA [pdf]) which provided for the establishment of a monitoring program to cover “the long term state and health of the ecosystemic and socio-economic environment in the Nunavut Settlement Area.” Justice Johnson assessed damages on a disgorgement basis calculated by reference to the expenditures that Canada avoided making by failing to implement this provision of the NLCA in a timely way.

KatyBarnett has argued in her great new book Accounting for Profit for Breach of Contract. Theory and Practice (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2012) that disgorgement (or account of profits, or restituitonary damages) for breach of contract within the orthodox contract law principles. In her view, the moral bases for disgorgement damages are deterrence and punishment, which shape the remedy in important ways. Moreover, courts are also concerned with vindication of the plaintiff’s performance interest, and it is pivotal in these cases that the plaintiff cannot procure a substitute performance via an award of damages or specific relief. As a consequence, she argues that disgorgement should be available in two categories of case: ‘second sale’ cases, where the defendant breaches his contract with the plaintiff to make a more profitable contract with a third party; and ‘agency problem’ cases, where the defendant promises the plaintiff he will not do a certain thing, and the plaintiff finds it difficult to supervise the performance. NTI v Canada seems to be a case of this second type. As Johnson J said (at para 333):

I am satisfied that Canada’s failure to implement an important article of the land claims for over 15 years undermined the confidence of aboriginal people, and the Inuit in particular, in the important public value behind Canadian land claims agreements. That value is to reconcile aboriginal people and the Crown. It would be manifestly unjust to allow the Crown to benefit from its failure to fulfill its obligations under Article 12.7.6. It is also important that to ensure that the Crown properly respects and fulfills its obligations under land claims agreements, including obligations to provide benefits that are not capable of being quantified in financial terms.

About The Author

Eoin

You know, I only just noticed this now! Shows how out of it I have been with blogging this past 6 months. Thanks for the nice comments about the book. And I keep meaning to write something about this case as it raises two passions of mine: indigenous land rights and gain-based damages. So much to do, so little time to do it in. Will be in England next week for 8 weeks, but don’t think I’ll have to time to make it over to Ireland, alas.

Recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution