It doesn't matter, because no one is going to listen to this fuckwad more than 1:38. So it's pointless to ban this stupid shit.

Click to expand...

6,300 views and 192 likes vs only 32 dislikes.

It only takes one such person to be crazy and turn into an Elliot Rodgers by having people like this guy validate his sexist views.

Click to expand...

Forcibly silencing someone is not the right answer. The stuff this guy is saying is utter nonsense, but he has the right to say it. Remember the quote?

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

He can say the most vile, offensive things, and we should disagree with him, but at the same time defend his right to say them.

Click to expand...

Well he's encouraging rapists and other types of sociopaths with his rhetoric. This stuff is exactly what they want to hear to justify their extreme misogyny.

And I was sent to this video by basically an unrelated, completely innocent video. So Youtube is a special case where it guides you towards and essentially promotes that content. So you need more restrictions/safeguards, at least.

I suppose I'd be fine if videos this controversial/vile at least were never suggested for the next viewing. Or even unlisted so someone would have to give you the link.

I get what you are saying. These things are hurtful and can influence other people to be hurtful. It's harmful to people that have had harmful things done to them for generations. 100% I get what you are saying.

We have to hear more than just what we want to hear. We must be offended in order to think critically and solve problems that humanity faces.

As a privately owned enterprise I think they should be allowed host whatever content they want so long as it does not break existing laws in the country it’s being viewed. So rather than focus on what can and can’t be hosted by YouTube, you should instead ask “to what extent do currently existing hate speech laws effectively curtail hate speech and what are the other means by which we can immune people to hate speech and would these be more effective?”

I get what you are saying. These things are hurtful and can influence other people to be hurtful. It's harmful to people that have had harmful things done to them for generations. 100% I get what you are saying.

We have to hear more than just what we want to hear. We must be offended in order to think critically and solve problems that humanity faces.

Forcibly silencing someone is never the answer.

Click to expand...

I don't think Nazism helps the public debate in any way, nor brainwashing cults. Some things don't have value to society other than being a warning that we have to protect ourselves from any violence or other harm they might try to cause.

And I personally feel the same for people who claim that half the world's population is incapable of love or loyalty in modern society and must change their behavior to accommodate their "mates".