Ohhh crud... even now I could've got away with it on river lol that is why we analyse I guess.

#2

4th November 2015, 11:16 AM

ConDeck [973]

Poker at: PokerStars

Game: NLHE

Yeah river just sucks and is a XF although with your bet sizing it's kinda tough...

I would say your sizing is off a 100bb deep and actually costs us money in this case.

Your 3bet pre flop is very large here, OOP this is a standard size but in position 90-95c is optimal.

Betting more than 50-55% on the flop in a 3b pot is also a mistake in my opinion. if you had made it this size pre your flop bet would be around $1.

This gives us a $3.95 pot so we can then bet pretty large on the turn, around $3.

We can still therefore comfortably jam rivers for our remaining $5.64 into a $9.85 pot so we do not have to worry about being able to GII.

In this situation though it actually saves us 57bb as we can comfortable check fold if villain bets this river as he is checking back 55-JJ.

Your sizing makes your turn bet half of your remaining stack leaving us around a 30% pot bet on the river, so we may as well just get this in on the turn (which would have been optimal in the below hand as played, regardless of the runout)

#3

4th November 2015, 5:40 PM

IPlay [2,260]

Online Poker at: Bovada

Game: Holdem

Nope, you got checked to on river, just check back.

#4

4th November 2015, 6:03 PM

ConDeck [973]

Poker at: PokerStars

Game: NLHE

re: Poker & $10 NLHE 6-max: QQ are we always going broke?

Quote:

Originally Posted by IPlay

Nope, you got checked to on river, just check back.

Misread the hand history there, yes you should not be betting this river ever...

dont like your sizing at all, seems so unbalanced towards value it could be really easy to play against as a reg.

half pot flop or less, size turn to pressure stacks on river, river bet is crazy as you know.

#9

8th November 2015, 6:53 AM

weldphaser [170]

Online Poker at: carbon poker

Game: holdem

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aces2w1n

Lol steven

Aces, im jut curious how many tables you playon at a time?

#10

8th November 2015, 9:00 AM

Aces2w1n [4,452]

Poker at: Pokerstars

Game: holdem

24

#11

8th November 2015, 12:45 PM

weldphaser [170]

Online Poker at: carbon poker

Game: holdem

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aces2w1n

24

24 tables dude are you serious wow. IMo man thats way, way, too much.

I don't know if you noticed or not, but in my previous posts thw last couple gays I've been asking about specific reads on some of your vilains. Especially the ones you have 400+ hands on bro.

I offer you this challenge. Play four tables. Instead of being bombarded by decision after decision. Chill, pull four tables up, and really work on your reads. stats are great, but sometimes you'll never get a big enough sample on a guy to really have your stats be accurate, and on the flip side. A villain who you have 400+ hands on. You should have some pretty good reads on the player. It's impossible to observe your villains in detail playing that many tables. I'm not saying drop to four and that's it, but I can tell your a solid player, but your lacking in villain reads.

At least thats what I see from my end . I thought you were gonna say you play like fifteen.

just give it a try for a week Ace

#12

9th November 2015, 12:27 AM

Aces2w1n [4,452]

Poker at: Pokerstars

Game: holdem

re: Poker & $10 NLHE 6-max: QQ are we always going broke?

Thing is ... im just farming fish.. not wasting time against the strong players unless i have a decent hand

Ill b forced to drop tables as i climb cuz the number of players drop as you go up unfortunstely

#13

9th November 2015, 1:10 PM

weldphaser [170]

Online Poker at: carbon poker

Game: holdem

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aces2w1n

Thing is ... im just farming fish.. not wasting time against the strong players unless i have a decent hand

Ill b forced to drop tables as i climb cuz the number of players drop as you go up unfortunstely

OK, your fish farming in 24 different farms , I just get worried bout ya get rusty vs. regs and such.