[7] Against the empirical
viability of the Deutsch-Wallace-Everett approach to
quantum mechanics, [with R. Dawid]Studies in the History and
Philosophy of Modern Physics, 47, 2014preprintpublished(DOI:
10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.05.005)[6] Unsharp humean chances
in statistical physics: a reply to Beisbart, [with L. Glynn, R.
Dardashti, and M. Frisch] In New Directions in
the Philosophy of Science (Springer), Volume 5, pp
531-542, 2014 preprintpublished(DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_37)[5] Symmetry and evolution in quantum
gravity, [with S. Gryb], Foundations of Physics, 44(3):
305–348, 2014 preprintpublished
(DOI:10.1007/s10701-014-9789-x)[4] Three denials
of time in the interpretation of canonical gravity, Studies in the
History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43(4):277-294,
2012preprintpublished
(DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031)[3] The role of
time in relational quantum theories, [with S. Gryb], Foundations of Physics, 42(9):1210-1238,
2012preprintpublished
(DOI:10.1007/s10701-012-9665-5) [2] Symplectic reduction
and the problem of time in nonrelativistic mechanics, British Journal for the
Philosophy of Science, 63(4):789-824, 2012preprintpublished
(DOI: 10.1093/bjps/AXR045) [1] Symmetry, reduction and
quantisation ; how should we interpret quantum Hamiltonian
constraints? Symmetry, 3(2):134-154,
2011open
access (DOI:10.3390/sym3020134)Book reviews[2] The disunity of
philosophy of science as a worrying hypothesis
Review of ‘Physical Theory: Method and Interpretation’
edited by Lawrence Sklar International Studies in
Philosophy of Science, (forthcoming)preprint