Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has just two weeks left to forge a new coalition government, but the Obama administration is working feverishly to prevent him from succeeding and force him from office, according to Middle East expert Dr. Michael Evans.

Evans is the author of numerous books about the various crises in the Middle East, including Atomic Iran: Countdown to Armageddon and the book he wrote with WNDs Jerome Corsi, Showdown with Nuclear Iran. He told WND its very clear why Netanyahu hasnt put a new government together.

The biggest stumbling block is the Big O, Mr. Obama. Mr. Obamas got his team over there. Theyve been over there a couple weeks, and theyre meeting with the opposition leaders, Evans said. This is fairly existential. Obama doesnt dislike Netanyahu. He hates him. He hates him. Netanyahu has been able to succeed against Obama. How did he do it? He went directly to the House of Representatives and got 18 standing ovations. He went to the U.S. media. But now hes come to power weakened. Obamas come into power strengthened.

Not going to work—But Obama can cause mischief by cutting funding to Israel. The end is coming for the O man—he has overstated his case—the use of drones on US citizens in the USA will be his downfall.

Obama doesnt dislike Netanyahu. He hates him. He hates him. Netanyahu has been able to succeed against Obama. How did he do it? He went directly to the House of Representatives and got 18 standing ovations. He went to the U.S. media...

He went to the people... directly to the American people. Netanyahu talked over the Washington noise directly to us - and he won us ... We stand with Israel - we stand with Netanyahu...

"Hoping Israel has dirt on Obama life that illustrates hes a moslem or worse, not eligible to be president."

Since you are a newcomer "morphing", you may have missed some of the truths which have appeared to make no difference in Obama’s tenure, truths with which many in Israel are quite familiar, and which they realize are of little value to a nation that has suppressed its Constitution, and whose Chief Executive has honestly declared the Constitution a dated and inadequate basis for our government, a statement of "negative liberties" where he wants a new bill of rights to confer positive liberties.

Every US Senator signed agreement with Senator Leahy and Judge Michael Chertoff in 2008 when the dialog, from the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings on Senate Resolution 511, sponsored by Obama campaign chair Clare McCaskill, Leahy, Obama, Clinton, Webb, and one other senator: My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen, Chertoff replied. That is mine, too, said Leahy. Obama signed agreement, and has never been asked to reconcile his having been born an alien, to an alien father.

This was the second bill sponsored by Democrats from the Obama Campaign committee to appear in early 2008, in a frantic effort to squelch questions about eligibility, since Obama was clearly ineligible. Their strategy, a clever one, was to pave the way for McCain, whose ineligibility had been proved over eight years of hearings and legal briefs. With McCain running no Republican dared raise the eligibility issue, but there was sure lots of analysis in the years leading up to 2008.

Without digging too deeply, Barack correctly described himself, albeit using constitutional legal definitions most had never heard of, as a naturalized citizen. There are but two classes of US citizen, natural-born, and natural. Barack, on his own web site, explained that because his father was British, he, Barack, was born a British subject. He was naturalized by the 14th Amendment, the same amendment created to make slaves into citizens. Slaves, though mostly born on our soil, could not be made “natural born citizens” because their parents weren't citizens. After the 14th Amendment, the children of naturalized slaves were natural born citizen, eligible to become president. The first generation naturalized for having been born on our soil were called, the term used by Barack, "Native-born citizens of the US." Barack said “I am a native-born citizen of the US”, the term used in the 14th Amendment. Barry was presumably born in Hawaii, though there are legitimate questions about the legality of the documents he provided.

We have dozens of Supreme Court cases, including decisions by five Chief Justices, in which the definition has been quoted, and at least one case in which that definition was necessary to the decision, making the definition a precedent. We were gullible and ignorant when power brokers played their several hands to get Obama into office. Too few, and I count myself, understood the misdirection of claiming that “Because natural born citizenship is not defined in the Constitution, we turn to current legal practice.” What some realized, and much credit is due attorneys Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo, and a little to Mark Levin, whose Liberty and Tyranny quotes Madison explaining this fact, the Constitution does not contain definitions - by design. For the meaning of the Constitution, based upon "eternal truths" to be understood eternally, words and terms must be interpreted using the common language and common law of its framers. Chief Justices John Jay, John Marshall, Morrison Waite, Charles Evans Hughes, and the author of the 14th Amendment, judge and congressman John Bingham, all told us that to be natural born is to be born on our soil of parents who were its citizens. That definition could be reinterpreted, even with precedent, since the Supreme Court is not bound by precedent, but the definition has never been reinterpreted, appearing as recently as the 1939 case Perkins v. Elg.

Israelis, many of them, know our law, but clearly, too few in our nation have knowledge, or care, for ineligibility to be important. Whether or not they have succumbed to Alinsky technique of ridicule, being called "Birthers", can only be guessed. Eligibility was of critical importance to our framers, and remains important to our legislators; John Conyers made two attempt to amend Article II Section 1 between 2003 and 2006, probably to make Obama eligible; Orren Hatch tried to amend it in 2002 to make Schwarzenegger eligible. There have been at least twenty six attempts to amend it. None has passed out of Congress.

The Obama/McCaskill-sponsored law, SB 2678 in February of 2008, would have to have evolved into an amendment to have legal effect. It was called the Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act. It was another of the Obama campaign to pave the way for McCain to run, somewhat ironic since it was Democrat lawyers who explored and proved McCain's ineligibility. Now he was useful. It is impossible to know whether there was a deal, beyond McCain's understandable feeling of entitlement. His ineligibility was an unfortunate oversight when Congress failed to incorporate the Panama Canal Zone before he was born; incorporation came in 1937, a year late.

When the Obama/McCaskill bill failed to pass, we will never know whether it was "sound and fury", or perhaps by design, since Obama/McCaskill specified ‘military families’, but some in the military join to become citizens, and are not necessarily so while serving. That would have implied an even stronger amendment making the children of non-citizens natural born citizens when case law, Wong Kim Ark, specifically made Wong Kim, born to "domiciled" Chinese parents in San Francisco, a citizen, but not a natural born citizen. In principle, a special interpretation seems warranted, but that is not the law, and SB 2678 failed to pass.

The Israelis undoubtedly know that Obama’s education was funded by the Saudis. It was no secret to our media, but an issue no one would talk about. A charismatic and remarkable attorney, Percy Sutton, one of the original pilots for the “Colored Army Air Corp” in WWII, a self-made attorney, who become principal counsel to Malcolm X, Louis Farrakhan, The Muslim Brotherhood, defended Charles Rangel and many others, and was President of the Manhattan Borough for a decade, described quite honestly, and proudly the help he provided Khalid al-Mansour in 1986 with getting Barry into Harvard Law. Al-Mansour, formerly Don Warden, a founder of the Black Panthers, and also a self-made success, graduating from Berkeley's Boalt Hall, had been a principal counsel to the Saudi Family for at least ten years by then, and was good friends with Vernon Jarrett, Valerie's father-in-law, who wrote a Chicago Trib pump piece about Wahhabi funding of disadvantaged black and Hispanic youths, with initial funding at twenty million dollars. Al-Mansour had previously formed a law firm with Prince Alwhaleed bin-Talal, whose MBA came from U of New Hampshire.

Israelis certainly would have followed the subject of Bin-Talal’s patronage since bin-Talal not only owns major shares in companies strongly connected to Israel like Cisco, Oracle, Siemens, AMD, Murdock's News Corp which owns Fox News and The WSJ, Citibank, AIG, ..., but donated twenty million to Harvard just before Obama’s acceptance, and later founded the “Alwaleed bin-Talal Center for Islamic Studies”, the largest branch of Harvard Divinity School, but also has large investments in Israeli businesses. Israel certainly knows who Obama is, even if few in the nation he presumably governs do, but the fact that Americans appear not to care would make exposure by recognized figures in the Israeli government pointless, and perhaps counterproductive.

The Saudis have no capability of defending themselves from Shia Iran. Their support, with enormous aid from Obama's military and State Department (can you say Benghazi?), is attempting to coalesce Egypt, Libya, Syria, eventually Lebanon, Jordan, and Turkey, into a buffer around Iran. Under many layers of subterfuge it may be that Israel is the most important ally to the Saudi's, and by implication, in spite of his vocal anti-Semitism, to their protégé in our White House. Most in the US did not know that Dubai Ports, which we prevented from managing our domestic ports, was the largest single destination for Israeli ships. The Middle East is a complicated problem, an understanding of which is of existential importance to Israel. That Obama was created for their purposes is only a secret to US citizens. Whether he will be useful to them, as he cripples our economy, remains to be seen.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has just two weeks left to forge a new coalition government, but the [Zero] administration is working feverishly to prevent him from succeeding and force him from office, according to Middle East expert Dr. Michael Evans... the author of numerous books about the various crises in the Middle East, including Atomic Iran: Countdown to Armageddon and the book he wrote with WNDs Jerome Corsi, Showdown with Nuclear Iran. ...[Zero]'s got his team over there. Theyve been over there a couple weeks, and theyre meeting with the opposition leaders... [Zero] doesnt dislike Netanyahu. He hates him. He hates him. Netanyahu has been able to succeed against [Zero]. How did he do it? He went directly to the House of Representatives and got 18 standing ovations. He went to the U.S. media. But now hes come to power weakened. Obamas come into power strengthened.

In point of fact, I am both ashamed of how Jews came to America and pushed socialism And concerned about how Americans might some day decide Jewish contributions in the hard sciences are not worth the socialism they have pushed for several generations.

Also, my physicians were all non-Jews when I was younger. Tampa had somewhere between few and no top line Jewish physicians.

Oh, my pediatrician was a Southern Baptist - super radio control modeller back in the 1950’s.

Sorry if I tweaked a sore spot for you.

41
posted on 03/11/2013 6:29:13 PM PDT
by GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."..)

In point of fact, I am both ashamed of how Jews came to America and pushed socialism And concerned about how Americans might some day decide Jewish contributions in the hard sciences are not worth the socialism they have pushed for several generations.

Also, my physicians were all non-Jews when I was younger. Tampa had somewhere between few and no top line Jewish physicians.

Oh, my pediatrician was a Southern Baptist - super radio control modeller back in the 1950’s.

Sorry if I tweaked a sore spot for you.

42
posted on 03/11/2013 6:29:23 PM PDT
by GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."..)

"How else could the glat kosher crowd order in Kosher Spare Ribs if the Won hadnt invented and supplied the shabbos compliant phone?"

"Nowhere did I differentiate between the Orthodox and other Jews as a function of their collectivist orientation."

Thats right, you a total schmuck, since you accuse and slander the one group of Jews that has the highest percentage of political conservatives (KOSHER JEWS, WHO DONT EAT USE EMERGENCY SHABBOS PHONES TO ORDER SPARE RIBS, YOU MORON) along with slandering the rest of the Jews over the small group of far-leftist ANTI-JEW-JINOS who some morons here will be happy to take your comments on and run with them, BLAMING ALL JEWS, including you, jackass.

IT'S IN YOUR BLOOD; according to the "Jews caused marxism" knuckle-draggers, if YOU are Jewish, you are JUST AS RESPONSIBLE as those actual marxist jinos, no matter how much and how often you join in and whine about "the collectivism of my fellow Jews."

You might as well as wear a shirt that says ""Those Jews killed Christ, not me!"

Hmmn, still hyperventilating, I note. Tranquility helps one to recognize both irony and satire, even when a FReeper assumes it was not necessary.

But, since you are attacking me, note the original line I typed: “”How else could the glat kosher crowd order in Kosher Spare Ribs if the Won hadnt invented and supplied the shabbos compliant phone?”

For those unfamiliar with the term “glat kosher” it means exceeding strict observation of the kosher laws.

Now, consider that just perhaps my line might have been satire. Try hard.

That didn't hurt all that much, did it?

Strident attacks, particularly ad hominum arguments, are an indication of your arrival at the position of a lawyer who can not argue facts or law - and therefore pounds on the table.

As for your “IT'S IN YOUR BLOOD; according to the “Jews caused marxism” knuckle-draggers, if YOU are Jewish, you are JUST AS RESPONSIBLE as those actual marxist jinos.”

Have you considered the sad reality of the Plymouth Colony having been established as a collective? That bit of socialism is not an instance of “IT'S IN YOUR BLOOD” as you screamed. But it is in the history books, particularly William Bradford's History of the Plymouth Colony, where he states “This community” was nearly our undoing” i reference to the ‘Starving Winter’.

He used ‘community’ because the more modern usage “communism” had not yet be penned.

Lastly, have you considered that if G*d gave Man Free Will, and if G*d is omnipotent, omniscent, etc - then he knew the fate of Jesus. Indeed, had Jesus not been killed, it is quite possible one of the central beliefs of Christianity would not exist.

Not being privy to the plans of G*d, I must restrict myself to study of the Law - as any good Jewish man should.

The intersection of Judeo-Christian Law and the American experiment in a Constitutionally limited Republic of self regulating citizens is my main interest.

In that light, perhaps my calling out the faulty premises of socialism when practiced by our fellow Jews has become personalized. Such is neither my intent nor historically accurate.

To the best of my knowledge, Jews were not members of the Plymouth Colony - yet is was a socialist experiment.

Interestingly, the Pilgrims had socialism forced on them by their financial backers so that their percentage of profits from the Colony could be more easily collected.

Why the large majority of American Jews persist in their infatuation with the faulty premise of socialism escapes me.

Might you have an answer?

46
posted on 03/12/2013 8:29:02 PM PDT
by GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."..)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.