If you've read my ISO then you would have seen the reads I've seen fit to divulge. They are reads I feel strongly enough about to give and support if necessary. If I haven't given a read on someone, it's because they don't lean one way or the other yet, or there's conflicting information, or any other of a number of reasons why I wouldn't have given a read on someone yet.

In post 455, Desperado wrote:If you've read my ISO then you would have seen the reads I've seen fit to divulge. They are reads I feel strongly enough about to give and support if necessary. If I haven't given a read on someone, it's because they don't lean one way or the other yet, or there's conflicting information, or any other of a number of reasons why I wouldn't have given a read on someone yet.

Who are the ones you're most conflicted on and why?

I get the "null for lack of a read" slots not being discussed, but "null due to conflicted info" should definitely be brought up!

mod notes: Gamma Emerald is V/LA until January 17 and has been prodded. (note that prods on people who are V/LA come with the caveat of "just try to check in when you can so everyone knows you're still alive", though Gamma Emerald's V/LA should end before that would be strictly relevant anyway.)

In post 466, xyzzy wrote:"HEY," SOMEONE SAYS. "I THINK WE NEED TO ASK ONE IMPORTANT QUESTION: WHAT IS THE OMNIPOTENT VOICE IN THE SKY'S OPINION ON THE DOG/CAT DEBATE?"

"IT'S CATS," SAYS THE OMNIPOTENT VOICE IN THE SKY. "ALWAYS CATS."hey," someone says. "I think we need to ask one important question: what is the omnipotent voice in the sky's opinion on the dog/cat debate?""it's cats," says the omnipotent voice in the sky. "always cats."

Narna - He's gotten several top town reads; I haven't seen anything either way

Kain can be read, it justtakes a bit of effort. A "clear" read is rare though.

What do you think of Narna's tone and approach to the game? They seem to be narrating more than giving opinions (with a few exceptions) and playing it rather safe in general. In my quick Iso of them, I saw a lot of almost content, but not much that really had anything to it.

In post 468, Aristophanes wrote:What do you think of Narna's tone and approach to the game? They seem to be narrating more than giving opinions (with a few exceptions) and playing it rather safe in general. In my quick Iso of them, I saw a lot of almost content, but not much that really had anything to it.

Aye. That doesn't make them scum, either, but the hard townreads raise eyebrows for sure.

zefiend 383 was probably meant to sound super town but it has the opposite effect on me.Also dislike his push on desperado - not genuine.

VOTE: zefiend

What's not genuine about it?

More or less everything.You take small, neutral things people do and try to spin a case on them.People aren't always logic machines, that doesn't make them mafia.

Way to be as vague as possible. I only cased one person, and they are doing a decent enough job of responding to my points that we are making progress. Your last statement is out of left field and makes no sense. If that statement was consistent with my mentality, then drealmerz would be my #1 scumread.