The group includes a TV reporter, a grad student, a data control specialist ... and a programmer.

The Internet prophets of 1995, Helena, Montana

In the early 1990s, Cindy Gaffney attended a Silicon Graphics convention that showcased a new computer -- the Indy -- by way of a new invention: the World Wide Web. "Everybody in the room was absolutely amazed," Gaffney recalls. She could tell right then, she told me, that the Web would be "the way that we were going to be finding ourselves in the future." In 1995, Gaffney, who had been doing computer animation and film production work in San Francisco, moved back to her home state of Montana -- and she became a board member at the Myrna Loy Center in Helena, which had just gotten an Avid video editing suite.

"I thought, 'I'll just show kids here how to use it," she says of the web. Ultimately, "I wanted to really, really emphasize how important it was to know the Internet."

Gaffney wrote a script for a short PSA that would star kids from Helena's Ray Bjork school. And Barb Ridgway, the school's principal, selected a group of fifth-graders to be featured in the production. Those students both memorized Gaffney's lines and improvised some of their own. And they did much of the research that would inform the film, finding ways to apply the Internet to their own lives. Natasha Collins, for example -- she's the brunette in the royal-blue turtleneck -- mentioned that the Internet allowed you to "chat with a friend in Australia" because she herself had a friend in Australia: an exchange student who had lived near Collins when she was in Helena in the early 1990s. The pair had maintained their friendship as pen pals, Collins told me, and "I thought, 'wouldn't it be cool if I didn't have to wait a month to get a letter?'"

And then there was Carolynn Chaffee, the video's cat-holder. She brought Bandit -- her family's pet, and the film's co-star -- from home on filming day specifically for the purpose of the PSA.

While the video has been dubbed "prophetic" in large part because of its recognition of the feline foundations of the Internet, "the cat was kind of an accident," Gaffney says. Or, well, it was the will of the Internet and an accident. "When I was looking for [web] pages to put in the video, there were lots of cats already," Gaffney notes. "That's where I got the 'Feline Information Page' thing." Bandit was making, essentially, a rhetorical point: "Even as far-fetched as cats and cupcakes, you can already find it on the Internet."

More intentional was the 90s-tastic look the students sported in the film. Believe it or not, Collins says, it could have been worse. The students were told not to wear brand-name clothes, she recalls -- because the point of making the video was to air it as a PSA -- and to avoid clothes that would be too bright or loudly patterned to work well on TV. Which means that the kids were saved from the harshest mid-90s-ness that their video might have otherwise conveyed. There was no B.U.M. Equipment. There was no No Fear. There was no acid wash. "Some of the comments on the video say, 'Oh, they look so '90s," Collins says. "But we don't look as '90s as we could have."

Still. It's pretty amazing. The graphics, the glasses, the giant Macs (the biggest of which, Collins told me, was used to play Oregon Trail). And the video makes you wonder: Where are they now? What are they up to? And are they using the Internet? Here, as best as I could piece it together, are the kids who starred in the video. Clockwise from bottom left:

Natasha Collins
Collins currently lives in Chicago, where she's a grad student at the University of Chicago, studying public policy. She uses the Internet, she told me, to do much of her research.

Carolynn ChaffeeChaffee lives in Billings, Montana, where she works in ... information technology.

Bryce Burkholder
Burkholder lives in Helena.

Marnee Banks
Banks is a TV reporte based in Helena, covering Montana state politics and, occasionally, education. She was actually covering a school board meeting when Ridgway, her former principal, showed her the "prophetic kids" video. They watched it on an iPad.

As a broadcast reporter, Banks has logged many, many video clips. But nothing has reached the popularity of the 1995 PSA. "I think it might be my most-watched video," Banks says. "I hope my career didn't peak when I was ten."

It's been seventeen years since the group filmed their video. And though they've stayed in loose touch over those years -- meeting up when they've all been home for the holidays, that kind of thing -- the sudden virality of their mid-90s prophesies, they say, has given them a new reason to get back in touch.

Most Popular

The special counsel indicted the Russian nationals and three Russian entities for allegedly interfering in the 2016 presidential election, the Department of Justice announced Friday.

On Friday, February 16, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosentein announced that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, had indicted 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities on charges that including conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft. This is the full text of that indictment.

Students have mourned and rallied the public after the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High that left 17 dead.

Something was different about the mass shooting this week in Parkland, Florida, in which 14 students and three adults were killed.

It was not only the death toll. The mass murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High became the deadliest high-school shooting in American history (edging out Columbine, which killed 13 in 1999).

What made Parkland different were the people who stepped forward to describe it. High-school students—the survivors of the calamity themselves—became the voice of the tragedy. Tweets that were widely reported as coming from the students expressed grief for the victims, pushed against false reports, and demanded accountability.

The company’s unusual offer—to give employees up to $5,000 for leaving—may actually be a way to get them to stay longer.

On Monday, Amazon reportedly began a series of rare layoffs at its headquarters in Seattle, cutting several hundred corporate employees. But this week, something quite different is happening at the company’s warehouses and customer-service centers across the country: Amazon will politely ask its “associates”—full-time and part-time hourly employees—if they’d prefer to quit. And if they do, Amazon will pay them as much as $5,000 for walking out the door.

Officially called “The Offer,” this proposition is, according to Amazon, a way to encourage unhappy employees to move on. “We believe staying somewhere you don’t want to be isn’t healthy for our employees or for the company,” Ashley Robinson, an Amazon spokesperson, wrote to me in an email. The amount full-time employees get offered ranges from $2,000 to $5,000, and depends on how long they have been at the company; if they take the money, they agree to never work for Amazon again. (The idea for all this originated at Zappos, the online shoe retailer that Amazon bought in 2009.)

Outrage mobs are chipping away at democracy, one meaningless debate at a time.

The mob was unusually vociferous, even for Twitter. After the California-born ice skater Mirai Nagasu became the first American woman to land a triple axel at the Olympics, the New York Times writer Bari Weiss commented “Immigrants: They get the job done.”

What followed that innocuous tweet was one of the sillier, manufactured controversies I have ever seen on Twitter. Twitter’s socially conscious denizens probably only realized they should be outraged at Weiss after they saw other people being outraged, as is so often the case. Outside of Twitter, some of Weiss’s Times colleagues were also offended by the tweet—and even hurt by it. The critics’objection was that Nagasu isn’t herself an immigrant, but rather the child of immigrants, and so calling her one was an example of “perpetual othering.”

Tech analysts are prone to predicting utopia or dystopia. They’re worse at imagining the side effects of a firm's success.

The U.S economy is in the midst of a wrenching technological transformation that is fundamentally changing the way people sleep, work, eat, shop, love, read, and interact.

At least, that’s one interpretation.

A second story of this age of technological transformation says that it’s mostly a facade—that the last 30 years have been a productivity bust and little has changed in everyday life, aside from the way everyone reads and watches videos. People wanted flying cars and got Netflix binges instead.

Let’s call these the Disrupt Story and the Dud Story of technology. When a new company, app, or platform emerges, it’s common for analysts to divide into camps—Disrupt vs. Dud—with some yelping that the new thing will change everything and others yawning with the expectation that traditionalism will win out.

The clear goal of the special counsel is to speak to the American public about the seriousness of Russian interference.

With yet another blockbuster indictment (why is it always on a Friday afternoon?), Special Counsel Robert Mueller has, once again, upended Washington. And this time, it is possible that his efforts may have a wider effect outside the Beltway.

For those following the matter, there has been little doubt that Russian citizens attempted to interfere with the American presidential election. The American intelligence agencies publicized that conclusion more than a year ago in a report issued in January 2017, and it has stood by the analysis whenever it has been questioned. But some in the country have doubted the assertion—asking for evidence of interference that was not forthcoming.

Now the evidence has been laid out in painful detail by the special counsel. If any significant fraction of what is alleged in the latest indictment is true (and we should, of course, remind ourselves that an indictment is just an allegation—not proof), then this tale is a stunning condemnation of Russian activity. A Russian organization with hundreds of employees and a budget of millions of dollars is said to have systematically engaged in an effort (code named “Project Lakhta”) to undermine the integrity of the election and, perhaps more importantly, to have attempted to influence the election to benefit then-candidate Donald Trump. Among the allegations, the Russians:

Leggings and yoga gear are common sights at practice rinks. But in competition, gender-coded costumes still prevail.

Last weekend, one of the buzzier stories out of the Olympic ladies’ figure skating short program competition was one you might call … surprisingly surprising. The French figure skater Maé-Bérénice Méité made headlines: for the fact that she skated to a Beyoncé medley, and even more so, for the fact that she did it in pants.

More accurately, she did it in a bedazzled black unitard, but that didn’t stop news outlets and viewers on Twitter from pointing out Méité’s eye-catching, subtly subversive pants. “This French figure skater may not have won a medal, but her pants took people's choice,” raved Yahoo! News, and AOL named Méité’s bodysuit to its list of “most dazzling figure skating outfits” of these Olympic Games.

Like it or not, the middle class became global citizens through consumerism—and they did so at the mall.

“Okay, we’ll see you in two-and-a-half hours,” the clerk tells me, taking the iPhone from my hand. I’m at the Apple Store, availing myself of a cheap smartphone battery replacement, an offer the company made after taking heat for deliberately slowing down devices. A test run by a young woman typing at a feverish, unnatural pace on an iPad confirms that mine desperately needed the swap. As she typed, I panicked. What will I do in the mall for so long, and without a phone? How far the mall has fallen that I rack my brain for something to do here.

The Apple Store captures everything I don’t like about today’s mall. A trip here is never easy—the place is packed and chaotic, even on weekdays. It runs by its own private logic, cashier and help desks replaced by roving youths in seasonally changing, colored T-shirts holding iPads, directing traffic.

The director Ryan Coogler's addition to the Marvel pantheon is a superb genre film—and quite a bit more.

Note: Although this review avoids plot spoilers, it does discuss the thematic elements of the film at some length.

After an animated introduction to the fictional African kingdom of Wakanda, Black Panther opens in Oakland in 1992. This may seem an odd choice, but it is in fact quite apt. The film’s director, Ryan Coogler, got his start in the city, having been born there in 1986. His filmmaking career has its roots there, too, as it was the setting for his debut feature, Fruitvale Station.

A bunch of schoolboys (a fictionalized young Coogler perhaps among them) play pickup hoops on a court with a milk-crate basket. But in the tall apartment building above them two black radicals are plotting a robbery. There’s a knock on the door and one of the men looks through the peephole: “Two Grace Jones–lookin’ chicks—with spears!” I won’t recount the rest of the scene, except to note that the commingling of two very different iterations of the term “Black Panther”—the comic-book hero and the revolutionary organization, ironically established just months apart in 1966—is in no way accidental, and it will inform everything that follows.

In February 2011, Swiss citizens voted in a referendum that called for a national gun registry and for firearms owned by members of the military to be stored in public arsenals.

“It is a question of trust between the state and the citizen. The citizen is not just a citizen, he is also a soldier,” Hermann Suter, who at the time was vice president of the Swiss gun-rights group Pro Tell, told the BBC then. “The gun at home is the best way to avoid dictatorships—only dictators take arms away from the citizens.”

Apparently many of his fellow Swiss agreed. The referendum was easily defeated. Gun ownership in the countryhas deep historic roots and it is tied to mandatory military service for Swiss men between the ages of 18 and 34. Traditionally, soldiers were allowed to keep their weapons at home in order to defend against conquering armies. These fears came close to being realized during the Franco-Prussian War on 1871; as well as World War I, when the Swiss border was threatened; and World War II, when the country feared a Nazi invasion.