“Currently, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants every year, with more than 70 percent coming to the country through the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an UNLIMITED relatives to the U.S. In the next 20 years, the current U.S. legal immigration system is on track to import 15 million new foreign-born voters. Between 7 and 8 million of those foreign-born will arrive in the U.S. through chain migration.” JOHN BINDER

LUV FEST:

LIKE A WHORE AT AN ORGY…

HILLARY CLINTON and OBAMA’S CRONY BANKSTERS

“So when Clinton was hobnobbing with
Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein in 2013, while investigations of wrongdoing
by Goldman and the other Wall Street banks were still ongoing,
she was consorting with a man who belonged in prison.”

Will a Corrupt Candidate Become a Corrupt President?

If on January 20 at high noon Hillary Rodham Clinton puts her hand on a bible an historic hypocrisy will occur. It may start the nation to shatter. Read the oath of office:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

The “So help me God” part isn’t required. But since Hillary will make a spurious claim to “faithfully execute” the office of president, why not make a pledge to God? After all, God’s unimportant to Alinsky acolytes, Hillary counted among them. Lest we forget that Alinsky pays tribute to Lucifer in his manual. Saying “God” might not be any more relevant to Hillary than saying “fruitcake.”

Hillary’s claim to serve faithfully is a sham because? The staggering accumulating evidence of wrongdoing by herself and her husband, Bill. That’s just in the last 18 months or so.

Right now, Hillary is indisputably the most corrupt presidential candidate in the nation’s history. As Newt Gingrich has pointed out, the criminality that Hillary and Bill would bring to the White House alone makes anything that happened during the Grant, Harding, and Truman administrations pale by comparison. And for the record, those three presidents weren’t the centers of corruption. That occurred among appointees and others.

Since Hillary failed to “faithfully execute” the office of Secretary of State, why expect her to do otherwise as president? She who compromised national security by running highly classified information on her private servers? A grave criminal offense, which she’s avoided consequences for because the DOJ either strong-armed or enticed (or both) FBI Director James Comey.

There’s the Clintons’ pay-to-play scheme, decorously called the Clinton Foundation. It’s foundational to the Clintons and their cronies getting rich. If you wanted time with Secretary of State Hillary, it didn’t hurt to drop some rubles in Clinton Foundation coffers. Quite a few rubles, actually.

WikiLeaks just revealed the Doug Band memo that discloses Bill Clinton leveraging the foundation for perks. Hillary took her skim.

Decades of patterns of ethical violations and criminality are going to vanish if Hillary assumes the presidency? When you talk like a duck and walk like a duck you’re a… duck. Lord knows what other sordid matters lie deeply buried under the Clinton Library and Massage Parlor (hat tip, Rush).

Years of escaping consequences for her crimes must give Hillary an Olympian sense of entitlement. She must feel invincible. Her highhandedness, pathological. This makes for a very dangerous mind. It’s the stuff of hubris on the scale of a Greek tragedy. A Hillary disaster has the potential for national disaster.

What happens if Hillary wins on November 8? It becomes an election without resolve. It means one battle ends and another begins immediately. The stark truth about the Clintons won’t go away. They’re evading justice won’t disappear. Tens of millions of Americans won’t ever trust Hillary. Nor will the grassroots accept congressional Republican leadership. Paul Ryan’s blather about working with Hillary for the nation’s good isn’t sailing, particularly when Ryan’s agenda is at odds with most conservative and Trump voters’ aims.

Compounding Hillary’s towering conceit is a flawed leftist worldview that she shares with Obama. Obama’s reflexive leftism is proving now to be wholly ill-equipped to meet the dangers growing overseas and challenges at home.

Despite the propaganda, the economy is moribund. The Federal Reserve has pretty much used up its bag of tricks to soften a major recession’s blow. ObamaCare is an abject failure. Racial unrest festers and promises to burgeon. Keeping open the floodgates to Third Worlders, legal or not, a la Angela Merkel, means spreading social strife.

Putin, in response to Obama’s baiting and missteps about Syria, saber-rattles. Mishandling of relations with the Philippines by Obama has moved a strategic asset to the PRC’s corner, thereby emboldening the Chinese in their grab of the East and South China Seas. War on both fronts is possible. But appeasement by Hillary is also possible. After all, if you can be paid off, why not pay off? Obama paid ransom to the Iranians. But what does history teach about appeasement? The appeased are rarely satisfied, expecting more. Appeasement leads to subjugation or war.

A continuance of Obama’s policies (and once Hillary’s) in the Middle East will do nearly nothing to destroy ISIS, its allies, and offshoots. Protracted, indecisive conflict with these enemies means American blood and treasure squandered. Expect more and stepped up terrorism on these shores. Obama continues to wink at Iran’s nuclear weapons development. North Korea continues its missile development.

There’s Obama’s social agenda to transform America into Brazil. Brazil, where the corrupted elite live their lives in gated communities and travel with security, while citizens are left to grapple as best possible with economic stagnation, disease, and crime. Get creative about defending yourself, because guns will be harder to get in Hillary’s America and the cops will have been neutered. The Democrats are all-in, so why wouldn’t Hillary continue down this road?

As a Hillary presidency unravels, the nation will face a multiplicity of brutish realities that will grant few average Americans immunity.

What do we say to those who scold us, “We must honor the results of the presidential election.” Our reply: “We’ll certainly abide by the results. Hillary is president. But we most certainly don’t have to honor the person, she of low character and dishonorable actions. We will not. We will oppose her and her allies with renewed vigor.”

No “honeymoon” will come for the vixen Hillary, notwithstanding calls for such from Washington insiders and MSM pundits. Hillary’s thoroughly rotten. Her agenda and motives are poison to liberty; her leadership will pilot us into more perilous waters.

If Trump loses -- Heaven forefend -- the movement comprised of tens of millions of passionate, God-fearing citizens remains. Wrote Bruce Heiden in a superb analysis for American Thinker:

But without minimizing the importance of who actually becomes the next president, it should not be so difficult to recognize that Trump’s campaign has always had a second dimension. It combines features of both a presidential campaign and a protest movement.

And this:

The success of this protest campaign is not measured by the margin of popular votes on Election Day, or the Electoral College votes, but rather by the people who join the protest to make themselves heard, by casting votes or in other ways. [Snip] They are manifestations of immense popular discontent to which Trump’s candidacy and issues have given concrete form.

Democrats, the left, and the establishment (that includes insider Republicans) presume that should Hillary win, the millions of Americans who came out for Trump will disappear after Election Day. Or they can be shunted to the margins. They have grossly underestimated the convictions these Americans hold and the passions that have been aroused after years of affronts and abuses to their liberty and values.

If a corrupt candidate becomes a corrupt president on November 8, the nation’s woes will only begin.

Here we stand in the early part of the 21st century with a woman named Hillary Clinton who represents the new “oligarchy” of America. We’re no longer a “republic”. Hillary represents a new ‘royal class’ of elites no different than any “Divine Right of Kings”.

She’s lived a total lie for her entire life. Her marriage to “sexual predator” Bill Clinton must be the most insane and immoral story of all time as it defies the ethics of our society. She stayed with her husband through 40 or more sexual escapades with other women over 35 years of marriage, and even a national scandal known as the “Monica Lewinski Affair.” Hillary not only stayed by Bill Clinton, but she attacked those women who Bill sexually molested.

If I cheated on my wife just once, she would walk out the door the second she discovered my dishonoring of her. She wouldn’t wait for an explanation. How can the women of America vote for a woman named Hillary who disgraces the sanctity of marriage? How can they stand that Web Hubbell sired Chelsea Clinton and not Bill Clinton? Just look at Chelsea’s face and you see Web Hubbell as clear as day. That’s been her lie to the American people since Chelsea arrived. It’s total and complete fraud on Hillary and Bill’s part.

She ran the Clinton Foundation that siphoned millions for her homes and other pursuits of luxury. She got four good men killed in Benghazi, but gets a pass for lying and deceiving the FBI and the rest of us.

She promises to flood our country with more terrorist Syrian Muslim refugees to the tune of hundreds of thousands of them starting in 2017. How does anyone with a brain not understand the final outcome of that refugee onslaught?

From there, she promises amnesty for 20 to 30 million illegal aliens to ‘bring them out of the shadows’. Forget our laws! She wants to legalize criminals. Yet, somebody in high places applauds her and the polls show she races to win the White House. What and who stands behind such deception of the American people? Why do the American people delude themselves whether liberal or conservative?

She’s an out and out, bald-faced liar. She lives a life lies. How can anyone vote for her? Why would you vote for a lifetime criminal with a proven criminal record? Look back on Watergate where they fired her for lying. Look back at Whitewater where she defrauded us. Look back on “Lewinski-gate” where her husband Bill said, “That depends on what the meaning of is, is.”

Then, she employs a Muslim Brotherhood operative in Huma Abedin for the past 20 years at her side—giving her every possible method for injecting Muslims into our national government to make choices in favor of Sharia Law and Islamic dominance.

My God! Sharia Law stands against everything we hold dear in America. It stands against women’s rights. It stands against gay rights. It stands against free speech, free religious choice, children’s rights and animal rights. It’s a 6th century barbaric economic-religious

Every woman in America should vote against Hillary because every woman in America will ultimately face Hillary’s choices of Sharia Law and continued immigration invasion. We’re being invaded and Hillary aids, abets and promotes this immigration invasion.

I cannot understand how the American people can stomach Hillary Clinton. The facts speak for themselves. She represents everything we cannot stand, cannot stomach and cannot survive.

She flagrantly uses the “F-bomb” on anyone who crosses her. She uses it more than I have in my lifetime. Such incredible disrespect toward the FBI, Secret Service and Arkansas St

te Patrol officers!

Whatever happens, we need to make sure her sexual predator husband Bill Clinton does not get back into the White House. We must stop all Muslim immigration because, in the end, those Muslims all intend to dominate and overrun our country. We need to stop this “oligarchy” by our votes.

Lord Acton, 1834-1901, said, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men." (The same can be said for such women as Hillary Clinton.)

“The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

“Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.”

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” (Several fact checks contest the proceedings, but cannot definitely vanquish this event.)

While Secretary of State, she illegally used outside and insecure email servers to carry on our nation’s highest top secrets of classified information. That’s a direct violation of our laws and punishable by prison. She got away with it.

If she gets back into the White House, she will lie, deceive and undermine all Americans of every race, creed or color. All for what? For power! It’s that simple.

Frosty Wooldridge possesses a unique view of the world, cultures and families in that he has bicycled around the globe 100,000 miles, on six continents and six times across the United States in the past 30 years. His published books include: "HANDBOOK FOR TOURING BICYCLISTS"; “STRIKE THREE! TAKE YOUR BASE”; “IMMIGRATION’S UNARMED INVASION: DEADLY CONSEQUENCES”; “MOTORCYCLE ADVENTURE TO ALASKA: INTO THE WIND—A TEEN NOVEL”; “BICYCLING AROUND THE WORLD: TIRE TRACKS FOR YOUR IMAGINATION”; “AN EXTREME ENCOUNTER: ANTARCTICA.” His next book: “TILTING THE STATUE OF LIBERTY INTO A SWAMP.” He lives in Denver, Colorado.

Doug Schoen Puts His Support for Hillary On Hold

The evening that the FBI reopened its criminal investigation into Hillary’s email server, Democrat political analyst, pollster, author, and Fox News commentator Doug Schoen, together with "Justice" host Judge Jeanine Pirro and Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel at the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), all appeared on a segment of the "Sean Hannity Show".

After discussing how during the FBI’s investigation into Anthony Weiner sexting a 15-year-old girl new emails were discovered, Jeanine and Sean agreed that the findings had to be big for the FBI to open an investigation just 11 days prior to an election.

Critical of the FBI’s modus operandi, Jay Sekulow asked the panel how it was that “the FBI [did] not [initially] ask for and demand Huma Abedin's personal e-mail accounts?” Hannity cut in, “How did they agree to destroy evidence of other people. Who destroys evidence in a case?”

Sekulow expounded upon Sean’s question, telling the panel members:

[t]hat is called obstruction of justice if anybody else did it… Tonight, a grand jury needs to be impaneled, number one. Number two; a special prosecutor needs to be appointed immediately. Number three, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, and deputy director of the FBI McCabe need to not be involved in this process. A lot of people are praising James Comey because he opened it up. Let's cut the nonsense. This whole thing is ridiculous.

Sekulow stressed that what the FBI did:

[g]oes to the heart of our constitutional republic. And you don't do this in the United States of America. So if they reopened it, whether it's Wikileaks, whether it's Huma Abedin, it has to be really significant. And I think 11 days out, even though these FBI directors are saying we're just looking at it, for them to do this, it has to be big.

That’s when Hannity turned to Hillary promoter Schoen and asked for his opinion. Sean queried: “Doug?”

Slightly adversarial, Schoen bristled in response to all the criticism by confidently stating “Hillary is going to be elected!” Then Schoen said, “She's been under criminal investigation by the FBI for the bulk of the campaign and, you know, she's had a steady lead. It's 11 days out.”

In other words, Doug was sure that at this late date – 11 days out -- Hillary Clinton would still be elected president.

Hannity shot back:

She may get elected. But if crimes are committed, maybe before she gets into office she's going to be indicted. Maybe while she's in office she's going to be indicted. What, does Barack Hussein Obama give her a pardon as he leaves office? He could. Does she give herself a pardon?

Schoen said, “All of that could happen,” to which Hannity replied, “Really? Is that what you want for your country?”

Schoen responded, “I want her elected!”

Sekulow interrupted the duo and said, “I think we're on the precipice of a constitutional crisis if a grand jury is not empaneled and this is not handled correctly within our judicial system. “

After more banter and discussion between Pirro, Hannity, and Sekulow a bold Doug Schoen closed out the discussion when he recommended, “A special prosecutor needs to look at the FBI. It’s outrageous.”

For those who caught Schoen’s call for a special prosecutor to investigate the FBI, the suggestion seemed outrageous.

Then, much to everyone’s amazement, less than 72-hours later, on Fox Report Weekend hosted by Harris Faulkner, the guy who wanted to see Hillary elected, and who called for a special prosecutor to investigate the FBI, made another unexpected statement.

On a panel made up of Fox Political Insiders former Republican Congressman John LeBoutillier, and Democrat public opinion pollster Pat Caddell, Schoen, the diehard Hillary supporter shocked everyone with a public confession.

A sheepish Schoen spoke directly to Faulkner, saying:

As you know I have been a supporter of Secretary Clinton… but… and the but is a big deal, at least to me, given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election, no matter who wins. But, if the Secretary of State wins we will have a president under criminal investigation with Huma Abedin under investigation -- the Secretary of State -- the president-elect, if she should win, under investigation.

More concerned for country than party, a patriotic Schoen replied back:

Harris, under these circumstances I am actively reassessing my support…I’m deeply concerned that we will have a Constitutional crisis if she’s elected. I want to learn more this week see what we see, but as of today, I am not a supporter of the Secretary of State for the nation’s highest office.

So, two days after the FBI reopened the investigation into the Hillary email server debacle, Democrat faithful, Doug Schoen, who has supported the Clintons for 22 years, publicly denounced his support for the former Secretary of State’s bid for president.

In 2003, according to the Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles, 57,600 cars were stolen in Phoenix. It is now the car-jacking capital of the world. Most were SUVï¿½s and pickup trucks. At a conservative average of $15,000.00 per vehicle, owner losses exceeded $864 million. Insurance companies in the state suffered incredible claims from policyholders.

Worse, how would you like to walk out of your home or business to see your car gone? Imagine the hassle, violation of your hard work and disrespect for your well being.

Where did those vehicles go? Who stole them? Take a guess. Arizona is the temporary home of 500,000 illegal aliens. They cost Arizona taxpayers over $1 billion annually in services for schools, medical care, welfare anchor babies, loss of tax base and prisons. Illegals use those vehicles for smuggling more people and drugs from around the world into our country. When the vehicles are recovered, they are smashed-up wrecks in the desert. If not found, they have new owners south of the border as thieves drive the cars through the desert and into Mexico as easily as you drive your kids to soccer practice. THATs how porous our borders are!

The chilling costs of illegal migration reach like an octopus into every aspect of our lives.

Illegal aliens displaced American workers at a cost in excess of $133 billion dollars last year according to Harvard Professor George Borjas. College and high school kids cannot find a summer job in yard care, landscape, fast food or service jobs. Why? Illegal aliens work them at a third the wage and often, under the table.

Not only do your kids not have jobs; you're paying taxes for illegal aliens who are not paying taxes.

Annually, 75 percent of drugs arrive from Mexico at a net cost of $120 billion hard currency that leaves our country for good. In addition, our tax dollars pay $80 billion for the War on Drugs each year. It is a war that hasnï¿½t been won in the past 30 years and drugs are as available today to your teenager as they were in 1970.

When an alien criminal gets caught for rape, murder or drug distribution, you pay $1.6 billion annually in prison costs to house, feed and clothe those filling 30 percent of our federal and state prisons not to mention TV, movies, weight rooms and other entertainment they enjoy while being incarcerated.

Is your blood boiling at this point? How about illegal alien anchor babies? Over 300,000 women annually arrive pregnant and drop them on U.S. soil. You pay food, housing, medical and schooling for them to age 18 PLUS their mother. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, average annual cost per child K-12 is $7,161.00 and exceeds $109 billion annually per cycle of anchor babies. That your money given out to 300,000 moms and their kids annually and all they did was get pregnant and birth that child on U.S. soil.

If you haven't had a heart attack by now, you'll need Tums after this figure. The average head of household illegal alien costs you $2,700.00 in welfare money over and above any taxes he or she pays in their meager paying jobs. With 15 to 20 million illegal aliens in the USA, that figures exceeds $20 billion of your tax dollars. (Source: Center for Immigration Studies, August 2004)

How about the $56 billion in pure cash illegal migrants sent to their home countries last year and every year? That's after their kids enjoyed free education, free lunches and free medical care paid for by you. Mexico receives $15 billion annually from its worker drones. No wonder Vicente Fox sent us 9.2 million illegal alien Mexicans so far.

With a minimum of 15 million illegal aliens in our country, these figures are the tip of the iceberg. Average bilingual education is $1,200.00 per illegal alien student. Get this! We educate 1.1 million illegal alien children each year. Do the math! Ready for another anvil dropped on your toe fact? You paid $27 billion to provide forms, ballots, interpreters and brochures for languages other than English in 2003.

An estimated one-third to one-half illegal aliens work off the books. It costs $200 million to provide for emergency health care for illegal aliens in the Border States annually. California with over three million illegals paid $79 million, BUT four of their major LA hospitals bankrupted and shut their doors in 2004. Texas with 1.5 million illegal aliens paid $74 million in hospital care. Who is Texas? You, the taxpayer, thatï¿½s who! Because you, in your state, pay commensurate medical care according to your illegal alien population. Georgia ran a $63 million deficit for 64,000 unpaid doctor visits to their Grady Health Care system in 2002. In the same year, Georgia taxpayers paid $27 million for 11,188 anchor baby hospital births. Georgia taxpayers paid a whopping $242 million for educating illegal alien kids in 2003. What is it in your state?

What are the consequences? One in two adult African-Americans in New York is unemployed. African-American childrenï¿½s poverty grew by 50 percent since 1999. Why? Their dads canï¿½t find work.

It costs you, the taxpayer, $68 billion a year JUST to pay for the resettlement of legal immigrants.

Fellow Americans, we are $7.384 trillion in debt as of November 1, 2004. This yearï¿½s budget deficit exceeds $413 billion. Our trade deficit stands at $400 billion. Our consumer debt exceeds $2 trillion and our average credit card carries an $8,000.00 balance. Our U.S. government borrows $1.6 billion daily from foreign banks, just to stay afloat. Have you ever heard of the Titanic? We are taking on heavy immigration numbers while weï¿½re being financially bled to death. Are we in trouble or what?

Who brings this fiscal nightmare into America? Take a guess. The majority of your Congress! President George W. Bush himself! Tom Ridge, who wonï¿½t guard our borders from this invasion, but gets his orders from Bush! Illegals are arriving at over 4,000 per night according to Time Magazine, September 12, 2004, "Who Left the Door Open?" I quote, "That total of illegal aliens flooding into the United States this year will total three million enough to fill 22,000 737 Boeing airliners, or 60 flights every day for a year." Don't you think with that many illegals crossing nightly that anyone with a brain would send troops to our border to protect from an invasion? Since we just re-elected the same Congress and president, you can expect more of the same.

You can count on your corporations devouring cheap labor as they send you to the unemployment lines. Additionally, they pay PAC groups to keep senators and congressmen in their back pocket. How do I know? Only 22 companies in 2003 were taken to court for hiring illegal aliens. None went to jail. However, it's a $10,000.00 fine per illegal alien hired and up to five years in prison. You would think that would deter corporations. Not when they've bought off enforcement!

Who else figures in this grand scheme? Your governors and mayors who provide sanctuary laws for illegal aliens! Mayor Bloomberg of New York City.

Governor Baldacci of Maine! Governor Bill Owens of Colorado! Mayor Hickenlooper of Denver! Mayor of Los Angeles! Mayor of San Francisco! Mayor of Chicago! Mayor of Miami! How do I know? All those cities and dozens more give sanctuary to illegal aliens with Special Order 40.

Illegals remain in our country with exemption from arrest, they are federal criminals!

Can you blame millions of desperate people for coming illegally to America? Hardly! Do you think they will stop coming since the world adds 80 million annually of poor, hopeless people from war torn, ravaged and impoverished Third World countries?

Not a chance! This is the land of free milk and honey. As long as our leaders allow the invasion and not enough Americans speak up, you can expect 12 million more illegal aliens in the next four years. Who pays for this invasion of your country? You do!

As a final note, if youï¿½re as sick of this nation-destroying dilemma as I am, go to my web site. Iï¿½ll send you an action letter with 17 effective points to change our nation's suicidal course. Whatever your talent, you will become a part of this movement to save our country from this disaster being brought to us by our leaders. You may send that action email out to your friends and they can send it to their friends. As Americans we must link arms, hearts and minds to take action to preserve our country and force our leaders to stop this illegal immigration madness. It's called a consciousness shiftïng and it's going to take every one of us. That means everything you do, COUNTS!

What scandals might the American people find themselves dealing with in Hillary Clinton’s Administration if she slides into the presidential home plate, trailing a cloud of controversy?

Let us be honest about who suffers from presidential misbehavior—it’s the American people who pay the price, including the literal price of the expensive investigations. The odds of justice actually catching up with Hillary Clinton dwindle to almost zero if she gains the White House. She might have to sacrifice an aide here and there, but if the political system of 1998 couldn’t remove her husband from office for blatant perjury, it’s hard to imagine what could possibly bring The First Woman President down in the even more corrupt and confused political system of 2017.

That being said, here are a few lingering legal headaches Clinton could face:

1. Perjury: Why not start with a blast from the Clinton past? Hillary Clinton signed documents testifying that she turned over all work-related emails to the State Department, on orders from a federal judge, under penalty of perjury. We already have indisputable proof she violated this sworn statement… thousands of times.

The cloud of false statements under oath surrounding Hillary Clinton is thousands of times thicker than the one around Bill. Democrats seem to have found a hidden clause in the Constitution that says Clintons can never be prosecuted for perjury, but Madame Secretary is really stress-testing that particular privilege of Clintonhood. One would think the federal judiciary had some interest in establishing that sworn documents must be taken seriously.

2. Obstruction of Justice: Bill Clinton’s primary motive for committing perjury was to obstruct justice—it was the second count in his impeachment. (The justice he was obstructing was a sexual harassment suit from Paula Jones, at a time when liberals insisted sexual harassment was the most overlooked, under-prosecuted crime in the legal code.)

Hillary’s thousands of perjury counts are also related to the obstruction of justice. She held back documents she didn’t want Congress to see. She subverted the Freedom of Information Act, which is a law, not a lovely suggestion.

Most media timelines of the Clinton email scandal are either incomplete or deliberately obtuse, because they almost never accurately relate how her secret server was discovered. For example, these timelines from USA Today, CNN, and ABC News all get it wrong.

Sharyl Attkisson, who was a participant in the story, has an accurate timeline that makes the important point Clinton-friendly media outlets don’t want to talk about: we know about the secret server because the State Department was sued for failing to respond to FOIA requests. The State Department’s official story is that they were surprised to discover Clinton was withholding thousands of documents on her private computer.

That’s straight-up obstruction of justice, in cases involving multiple federal courts, as surely as Bill Clinton’s impeachable offense of obstructing the Paula Jones suit. Clinton may become untouchable if the American people allow her into the White House, but the lawsuits don’t evaporate, and neither do the angry judges.

3. Bribery: After the FBI set off a headline earthquake by re-opening the Clinton email investigation, we learned that several other FBI investigations of Clintonworld have been quietly in progress for some time. One of those investigations is digging into bribery allegations against the Clinton Foundation. The FBI agents working on these cases were reportedly very angry that top Bureau and Justice Department officials were pressuring them to drop their investigations.

The most attention-grabbing of these suspicions concerns an FBI official, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife received an inexplicably huge political donation from Clinton bagman Terry McAuliffe, currently the governor of Virginia. The timing of this donation was so convenient that even the Left side of the blogosphere has produced some uneasy speculation that McCabe probably should have recused himself from all things Clinton-related.

Well, he didn’t recuse himself, and the conflicts of interest are so apparent that the lack of a chiseled-in-stone quid pro quo might not be enough to kill this case off. After all, corrupt officials aren’t usually dumb enough to write down their quid pro quo agreements, or repeat them into microphones. The McCabe controversy already has longer legs than most observers expected, when the news first broke.

4. Pay for Play: There has also been recent confirmation that the FBI has investigated influence-peddling allegations against the Clinton Foundation, which was so obviously used for that purpose that it’s funny to watch Clinton apologists insist nothing can be proven in a court of law. Some of the most vigorous infighting within the Bureau reportedly concerns whether pay-for-play investigations should move forward.

WikiLeaks has exposed emails from Clinton insiders that openly discuss how the Foundation was part of a network that steered millions of dollars to “Bill Clinton Inc.” Even longtime members of the Clinton syndicate professed themselves troubled by these operations. They were also unhappy with arrangements like Hillary Clinton’s agreement tospeak in Morocco after a $12 million donation to the Clinton Global Initiative.

It’s entirely possible that more documentation about these suspicious Clinton Foundation dealings will come to light after the election, especially if some of the people Clinton took money from grow upset with her. It’s downright dangerous to have a President with so many strings attached.

5. Illegal Use of a Nonprofit Organization: There are many laws governing the management of charitable organizations, generally intended to prevent them from becoming money-laundering operations, ripoff operations, and vehicles for political influence peddling. The Clinton Foundation and its galaxy of related operations may eventually find itself answering some questions about compliance with those laws, assuming the IRS decides to stop focusing its efforts on hassling mom-and-pop pro-life groups and kitchen-table Tea Party outfits. If the Foundation is ever held to account for any other impropriety, charges of abusing a nonprofit should be part of the legal package as well.

6. Racketeering: Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy has recently observed that Hillary Clinton’s abuse of the State Department looks an awful lot like a “racketeering enterprise,” which could trigger the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1971, more widely known as RICO. McCarthy explained:

Under RICO, an “enterprise” can be any association of people, informal or formal, illegitimate or legitimate – it could be a Mafia family, an ostensibly charitable foundation, or a department of government. It is a racketeering enterprise if its affairs are conducted through “a pattern of racketeering activity.” A “pattern” means merely two or more violations of federal or state law; these violations constitute “racketeering activity” if they are included among the extensive list of felonies laid out in the statute.

7. Fraud: Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel has been building a case that the “Clinton Charity Network,” as he calls the complete system of Clinton operations, has committed “charity fraud of epic proportions.” In part, he refers to discrepancies between donor accounts and the Clinton Foundation’s books.

Others have pointed out how the Clinton Health Access Initiative has essentially ignoredNew York state law for years, without a peep from Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (who just happens to be part of the Clinton campaign’s “leadership council.”) There are some interesting differences between the paperwork CHAI submitted to the IRS and what it submitted to the state of New York, which has more specific requirements about identifying foreign donors.

In addition to getting a free pass on perjury, the Clintons are traditionally allowed to violate tax laws without penalty, eventually refiling paperwork when “errors” are discovered years after the fact. Another round of whoops-my-bad, no-harm-no-foul “refiling” during a Hillary Clinton presidency would be embarrassing, especially if she’s busy trying to ratchet up taxes on everyone else.

At death’s door….. “I won’t go to
prison!” Hillary Clinton

HILLARY BEGS OBAMA FOR PARDON as she flees the country leaving Billary to
count their hundreds of millions from influence peddling bribes.

HILLARY CLINTON’S ADMIN: CUT SOCIAL SECURITY, ELIMINATE

BORDERS WITH
NARCOMEX, AND END REGULATION OF OBAMA’S

CRONY BANKSTERS

"Hillary Clinton is a known liar, a criminal of monstrous
proportions; others have gone to prison for crimes she has committed over
and over: lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, violating national security laws
by which she was bound as Secretary of State, etc. It's a long list."

Clinton, the candidate favored by most of Wall Street and the corporate
elite and large sections of the Republican Party establishment, is seeking to
assemble something akin, within the framework of the US political setup, to a
grand coalition between the Democratic Party and the Republican leadership.

Transcripts released by WikiLeaks of Clinton speeches to Wall Street
bankers, for which she received six-figure paychecks, show her praising the
recommendations of the 2010 Simpson-Bowles deficit-reduction commission, which
called for sweeping cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; the
elimination of 200,000 federal jobs; a tax on employees’ health benefits; and
huge cuts in income taxes for the wealthy and corporate taxes.

“But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at
the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it:
gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral,
immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That
should be clear to every person on the planet by now.”

HILLARY’S DREAM of OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES
DEPRESSED

The words are out of
her mouth -- Clinton will never again be able to credibly claim any intention
to secure the nation’s borders or to stop or even reduce the massive illegal
invasion of America that will be the enduring legacy of the Obama years.

We all know that in
her vision of an America without borders, Clinton sees enduring one party rule
by the Left, while America’s corporate and banking elite envisions low labor
costs forever.

Wikileaks exposed!

BARACK
OBAMA AND THE GOLDEN AGE OF CRONY BANKSTER LOOTING…. And not one went to
prison!

FOR
8 YEARS BARACK OBAMA’S BANKSTER CRONIES AT CITIGROUP RULED AMERICA’S ECONOMY
AND LOOTED IT INTO A DEPRESSION

“Citigroup’s recommendations came just
three days after then-President George W. Bush signed into law the
Troubled Asset Relief Program, which allocated $700 billion
in taxpayer money to rescue the largest Wall Street banks. The single
biggest beneficiary was Citigroup, which was given $45 billion
in cash in the form of a government stock purchase, plus a $306
billion government guarantee to back up its worthless mortgage-related
assets.”

“As president, Obama not only funneled trillions of dollars
to the banks, he saw to it that not a single leading Wall Street executive
faced prosecution for

the orgy of speculation and swindling that led to
the financial collapse and Great Recession, and he personally
intervened to block legislation capping

executive pay at bailed-out firms.”

“So when Clinton was hobnobbing with
Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein in 2013, while investigations of wrongdoing
by Goldman and the other Wall Street banks were still ongoing,
she was consorting with a man who belonged in prison.”

Don't Be Fooled: Hillarygate Probe Is Now a Formal Federal Criminal Investigation

The NY Times and the Wall Street Journal both reported on Monday morning that an FBI warrant application to a federal judge over the weekend for permission to search Huma Abedin's emails and laptop had been granted. The application was made on the basis of the Clinton email investigation. Necessarily, that application (as required by the Constitution's Fourth Amendment) would have been supported by FBI affidavits.

This new fact is a development of immense potential significance – both for Mrs. Clinton personally and for us as American citizens. It is also unprecedented in American history.

At a minimum, it enables us to pierce the thick cloud of black ink and disinformation released over the weekend by Team Hillary and which is being widely misreported in the current news cycle.

The FBI agents had to make this warrant application because their existing Fourth Amendment search authority was on the basis of Anthony Weiner's (unrelated) suspected misconduct with an underage girl. That investigation was already a grand jury matter. However, that grand jury's authority – which is supervised by a federal judge -- did not authorize the Bureau to pursue information which might be pertinent to the inquiry into Mrs. Clinton's use of a personal email server while she was Secretary of State. Making that application, under standard DOJ protocol, required approval from Main Justice. In this case, the assistant attorney in charge of the Criminal Division, if not the attorney general.

Since the application was made, it's safe to conclude that the Criminal Division at Main Justice authorized the warrant application. Thus, at a minimum, the senior leadership of the Justice Department is not as unanimously condemnatory of FBI director Comey's letter to Congress on Friday as media reports would lead us to believe.

It also explains why Director Comey issued his letter to Congress. The reporting tells us that the FBI's decision to make a warrant application to the supervising judge of the Weiner grand jury triggered Mr. Comey's decision to notify Congress. Having promised Congressional leaders (perhaps unwisely, since he was not required to do so) that, if the Bureau uncovered new evidence relating to Hillarygate which required further inquiry, he would so notify them, he proceeded on Friday to keep his word and do so.

Now he's being condemned by the Democrats and the MSM for not saying why. We'll get to the reason why he's not in a minute. But, first, the granting of the warrant application means several important and new things:

1) A federal judge supervising a grand jury has now made a finding, based on FBI affidavits which present evidence gathered during the preliminary Hillary inquiry (the one which the FBI director stated had been closed back in July), that there's probable cause to believe that a federal crime was committed in connection with Mrs. Clinton's use of a private email server.

We still, however, don't know what crime(s) are suspected to have been committed. Or by whom.

2) The FBI can use this new grant of grand jury authority to investigate Mrs. Clinton's use of a private email server for the first time to issues subpoenaes to obtain testimony from witnesses and compel the production of documents and things. The Bureau and DOJ can, furthermore, use the judge's probable cause finding to support further warrant applications.

This means that, if DOJ authorizes it, a United States attorney now has the ability for the first time to put subpoenaed witnesses before a grand jury. There, without their lawyer in the room, they may be questioned under oath by a federal prosecutor. If the witnesses take the Fifth – and the witness's lawyer is allowed to sit outside the grand jury room and be consulted by the witness before answering a question, they can be immunized and, if they still refuse to testify, a judge can jail them indefinitely until they change their mind.

Huma Abedin, according to prior reporting, received a grant of immunity during the FBI's preliminary investigation. During the first Clinton presidency, Clinton allies chose jail over cooperating with the federal grand jury investigating both Clintons.

We may get to see if a new generation of Clinton allies are willing to do the same.

3) The liberal media's reporting that the Hillarygate email server investigation has not, in fact, been "reopened" is totally false.

Why?

Because, not only is the probe reopened, it has been upgraded and expanded. It has been upgraded from a preliminary inquiry to a formal criminal investigation with grand jury power. That also means that, at least at the level of the federal grand jury itself, assistant U.S. attorneys assigned to that grand jury are now for the first time formally involved.

In other words: the Beast is now fully awake.

4) This weekend's development potentially escalates the threat to Mrs. Clinton. While several other procedural steps and processes are necessary, it is a federal grand jury, not the FBI, which issues indictments. The FBI -- using the the grand jury to obtain testimony, conduct searches and compel the production of documents and things - investigates crimes. The U.S. Attorneys, acting though the grand jury, charge and prosecute those persons whom the grand jury finds probable cause to believe have committed those crimes.

5) This weekend's development also means that, for the first time in American history, a candidate for President of the United States is likely now a subject/target of a federal grand jury investigation.

These facts now enable us to analyze and dispel Team Clinton's attempts to lay down a thick fog of misdirection over the scene.

Here it is: Mrs. Clinton's demand that the FBI be "transparent" is pure posturing -- spinning to the max (which Mrs. Clinton, as the most criminally investigated presidential candidate in U.S. history, well knows). Younger readers, please take note: this is not, to put it mildly, Hillary Clinton's first rodeo.

Not for the first time, Mrs. Clinton is being totally disingenuous with the voters (and the media). She is also making FBI director Comey into her personal punching bag. And she's doing it because she knows that the director can't fight back.

In this, Mrs. Clinton is simply repeating a tactic which she and her catspaw Sidney Blumenthal used to good effect during the Whitewater, Travelgate, and Monica Lewinsky investigations in the 1990s. And that tactic worked.

It’s called grand jury secrecy. Now that Hillarygate is, for the first time, a grand jury investigation, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) prohibits the FBI and prosecutors from saying anything about "matters occurring before the grand jury." Their lips are sealed.

Team Hillary's lips, however, are not. They are neither federal prosecutors nor "agents of the grand jury." So, Mrs. Clinton and her spokesmen -- unlike the federal law enforcement officials they've been targeting all weekend -- are free to tell us everything they know.

Let's see if they do. A reporter should ask them.

And, in the meantime, let's not bother to hold our breaths.

If Hillary really wants "transparency," let her release the FBI's warrant application for permission to search Huma Abedin and Mr. Weiner's emails for evidence relating to whether Hillary's use of a private server violated federal law. Huma's lawyers likely have it. If not, they can certainly get it.

Huma, of course, is also free to release the emails too.

That's why Hillary's demand for "transparency" by the FBI is moonshine. She damn well knows the feds can't do it.

She also now knows that the threat level against her has just been upgraded to ORANGE.

William Safire and Christopher Hitchens, thou shouldst be living at this hour!

Hillary did two favors for Morocco and then Clinton Foundation collected $28 million from them

It’s pay-to-play government, period. No doubt, all the principals will claim they were independently acting in the best interest of the Americna people, but the events speak to an inner logic. Richard Pollock of the Daily Caller News Foundation has the story laid out, explaining that a US industry was crippled, and its Moroccan competitor coughs up millions, in the first favor:

Hillary Clinton did two huge favors for Morocco during her tenure as secretary of state while the Clinton Foundation accepted up to $28 million in donations from the country’s ruler, King Mohammed VI, according to new information obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.

Clinton and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Lisa Jackson tried to shut down the Florida-based Mosaic Company in 2011, operator of America’s largest phosphate mining facility.

Jackson’s close ties and loyalty to the Clintons were revealed when she joined the Clinton Foundation’s board of directors in 2013, just months after she left the EPA. Jackson is also close to John Podesta, Clinton’s national campaign chairman.

Morocco’s state-owned phosphate company, OCP, would ostensibly have benefited from Jackson’s move to shut down Mosaic. Mohammed donated up to $15 million to the Clinton Foundation through OCP.

The other favor did not try to destroy American jobs, it merely acquiesced to Morocco’s invasion, rule of, and extraction of the mineral wealth from territory it does not legitimately enjoy sovereignty over. This is known by progressives as the rawest form of colonialism and imperialism. But for Alinsky disciple and champion of the oppressed Hillary Clinton, that was no problem:

Clinton also relaxed U.S. foreign aid restrictions on Morocco, thus allowing U.S. funds to be used in the territory of Western Sahara where OCP operates phosphate mining operations. The aid restrictions stemmed from Morocco’s illegal occupation of the territory since 1974.

Morocco is repeatedly condemned for seizing the territory and for unilaterally extracting the country’s valuable minerals, impoverishing what’s left of the local Sahrawi Arabs.

No nation recognizes Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara and the United Nation’s Security Council legal office and the International Court of Justice both demand that Muhammed withdraw his claim over the territory and end illegal extraction of minerals.

An email WikiLeaks made public last week illustrated how Clinton, while acting as secretary of state, negotiated an additional $12 million donation to the Clinton Foundation from Muhammed in return for holding the 2015 Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) meeting in Marrakech, Morocco. Another $1 million payment came from OCP to cover the expenses of the CGI meeting.

It’s time for all decent people to recognize that the label “Clinton Crime Family” is not entirely satirical.

October 31, 2016

The presidential race has changed because The Awful Truth about the Clintons is sinking in

I admit that my jaw dropped yesterday as I watched Doug Schoen announce that he is no longer able to support Hillary Clinton for president, as described on these pages by Jeannie DiAngelis. Anyone who has watched national politics closely over the last quarter century knows that Schoen is smart, principled, and has deep connections with the Clintons. That he would withdraw his support is a signal moment, in the literal sense, telling other principled Dems that the stink is just too much. I suspect that he has a lot of comfort with his unease, but it remains to be seen if he will start a cascade of people distancing themselves publicly. My guess is that few Democrat media complex players on the national level have his guts and integrity. For now.

But it takes no guts at all to stay home, or fail to vote for Hillary, if you are a Democrat taken aback by the cumulative effect of the revelations last week. Here is the logical chain of four shocks that I think a big enough (10%?) share of Democrats have pondered.

Shock Number One

The Clintons actively enriched themselves through the Clinton Foundation empire. Doug Band admitting that the same marks were targeted for donations, for speaking fees for Bill, and for consulting work for Teneo (which funneled money back to others in the machine, like Huma). AT readers may have few illusions about the way the Clintons made their fortune, but loyal Democrats always assumed it was incidental reward for their good work championing the oppressed. Clinton’s body man turned bag man Band shattered those illusions. It was deliberate and it was shady.

Shock Number Two

James Comey’s letter to Congress re-opening the email inquiry suddenly negated what Dems took as an all clear signal from him last July. They went ahead and nominated Hillary in the knowledge there was no criminal probe (of the emails – they did not know of the Clinton Foundation probe already underway)= rhanks to Comey’s July 5 presentation ion the evidence and the decision to not recommend prosecution.

The rug has been pulled out from under them.

Shock Number Three

The rifts within the FBI over investigating the Clintons are coming to light, and driving suspicions that a cover up may have been attempted. Loretta Lynch’s notorious tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton in private already planted seeds of doubt. To some degree, insiders and some Dem faithful have understood that the Clintons leave no stone unturned when it comes to protecting themselves from accusers. But what is frightening and threatening is the possibility of a grass roots revolt within the FBI, and the possibility of really serious leaks if the ball is dropped.

Shock Number Four

In combination, the three previous shocks mean we are headed for a constitutional crisis if Hillary is elected, and then indicted. Serious people who love the Republic –and that group includes even some Dem insiders – understand that this is a potential nightmare and a national security threat in an era of terror and unstable great power relations.

Schoen has shown how it is done. Now it is up to other Democrats to take their stand. NeverHillary's moment may have arrived.

October 31, 2016

Doug Schoen Puts His Support for Hillary On Hold

The evening that the FBI reopened its criminal investigation into Hillary’s email server, Democrat political analyst, pollster, author, and Fox News commentator Doug Schoen, together with "Justice" host Judge Jeanine Pirro and Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel at the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), all appeared on a segment of the "Sean Hannity Show".

After discussing how during the FBI’s investigation into Anthony Weiner sexting a 15-year-old girl new emails were discovered, Jeanine and Sean agreed that the findings had to be big for the FBI to open an investigation just 11 days prior to an election.

Critical of the FBI’s modus operandi, Jay Sekulow asked the panel how it was that “the FBI [did] not [initially] ask for and demand Huma Abedin's personal e-mail accounts?” Hannity cut in, “How did they agree to destroy evidence of other people. Who destroys evidence in a case?”

Sekulow expounded upon Sean’s question, telling the panel members:

[t]hat is called obstruction of justice if anybody else did it… Tonight, a grand jury needs to be impaneled, number one. Number two; a special prosecutor needs to be appointed immediately. Number three, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, and deputy director of the FBI McCabe need to not be involved in this process. A lot of people are praising James Comey because he opened it up. Let's cut the nonsense. This whole thing is ridiculous.

Sekulow stressed that what the FBI did:

[g]oes to the heart of our constitutional republic. And you don't do this in the United States of America. So if they reopened it, whether it's Wikileaks, whether it's Huma Abedin, it has to be really significant. And I think 11 days out, even though these FBI directors are saying we're just looking at it, for them to do this, it has to be big.

That’s when Hannity turned to Hillary promoter Schoen and asked for his opinion. Sean queried: “Doug?”

Slightly adversarial, Schoen bristled in response to all the criticism by confidently stating “Hillary is going to be elected!” Then Schoen said, “She's been under criminal investigation by the FBI for the bulk of the campaign and, you know, she's had a steady lead. It's 11 days out.”

In other words, Doug was sure that at this late date – 11 days out -- Hillary Clinton would still be elected president.

Hannity shot back:

She may get elected. But if crimes are committed, maybe before she gets into office she's going to be indicted. Maybe while she's in office she's going to be indicted. What, does Barack Hussein Obama give her a pardon as he leaves office? He could. Does she give herself a pardon?

Schoen said, “All of that could happen,” to which Hannity replied, “Really? Is that what you want for your country?”

Schoen responded, “I want her elected!”

Sekulow interrupted the duo and said, “I think we're on the precipice of a constitutional crisis if a grand jury is not empaneled and this is not handled correctly within our judicial system. “

After more banter and discussion between Pirro, Hannity, and Sekulow a bold Doug Schoen closed out the discussion when he recommended, “A special prosecutor needs to look at the FBI. It’s outrageous.”

For those who caught Schoen’s call for a special prosecutor to investigate the FBI, the suggestion seemed outrageous.

Then, much to everyone’s amazement, less than 72-hours later, on Fox Report Weekend hosted by Harris Faulkner, the guy who wanted to see Hillary elected, and who called for a special prosecutor to investigate the FBI, made another unexpected statement.

On a panel made up of Fox Political Insiders former Republican Congressman John LeBoutillier, and Democrat public opinion pollster Pat Caddell, Schoen, the diehard Hillary supporter shocked everyone with a public confession.

A sheepish Schoen spoke directly to Faulkner, saying:

As you know I have been a supporter of Secretary Clinton… but… and the but is a big deal, at least to me, given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election, no matter who wins. But, if the Secretary of State wins we will have a president under criminal investigation with Huma Abedin under investigation -- the Secretary of State -- the president-elect, if she should win, under investigation.

More concerned for country than party, a patriotic Schoen replied back:

Harris, under these circumstances I am actively reassessing my support…I’m deeply concerned that we will have a Constitutional crisis if she’s elected. I want to learn more this week see what we see, but as of today, I am not a supporter of the Secretary of State for the nation’s highest office.

So, two days after the FBI reopened the investigation into the Hillary email server debacle, Democrat faithful, Doug Schoen, who has supported the Clintons for 22 years, publicly denounced his support for the former Secretary of State’s bid for president.

The Muslim Sheikhdom Qatar is a major sponsor of ISIS and global anti-American terrorism. How disturbing is it that Bill Clinton sucked in a bribe of ONE MILLION DOLLARS under the guise of a birthday gift? There is NO one the Clintons will not sell us out to and have already!

In Hillary's America, D'Souza documents how Democrats transitioned from pro-slavery to pro-enslavement; the longstanding Democratic political war against women; how Hillary Clinton's political mentor was, literally, a cold-blooded gangster, Saul Alinsky; how the Clintons and other Democrats see foreign policy not in terms of national interest, but in terms of personal profit; and how Democratic-controlled cities have turned into hotbeds of crime and corruption. American Thinker interviewed him about his latest projects

HILLARY CLINTON GLOBAL PREDATOR

A Hillary victory means there won’t be a departure; merely a doubling-down by the elite, as they act with renewed zest to secure their interests -- versus the national welfare. The Great Imposition -- a war waged on average Americans -- will continue with awful consequences. J. ROBERT SMITH - THE AMERICAN THINKER.COM

“Forget the arrogance and corruption -- $153 million in Clinton family speaking fees from 2001, mainly bribes during her State Department years. Forget the lies, the lies about lies, and the perjury. Forget the security breaches. Forget enabling America’s most prominent sexual predator. Forget the trail of bodies stretching from Little Rock to Benghazi. Forget every scandal from Whitewater to deleted e-mails. Forget all of it.”