My web forums are archived here
http://15419450.weebly.talkiforum.com/
until I can secure the donations to get my website back up. IF you would like to donate, you may do so by clicking on the donate button on this page.
Thank you to all of my viewers and followers.

DO YOU F***ING PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT OUR LIVES ARE BEING MICROMANAGED AT EVERY LEVEL?

If there is one thing we can all do without, it is an overreaching
intrusive federal government which goes to great lengths to protect us
from ourselves — at our expense. Nor do we need a micromanaging, nit-picking
Big Brother to prohibit everything that isn't mandatory.

There is now a smoking section for
all the information about the government's efforts to get people to stop smoking.

And be sure to check out this material
about closed captioning — a
simple courtesy that gradually turned into an inalienable right.

There is a special subsection about Texas Governor Perry's vaccination mandate
on this page.

New!
The U.S. government recently outlawed the incandescent bulb! The environmental lobbyists insist that we
use fluorescent bulbs, whether we like them or not.

It's Official: New
Yorkers Are Slaves of the State. New York City monarch Michael Bloomberg will propose a ban on the sale,
by certain vendors, of large sugary sodas. This, of course, is done in the name of "public health" and "fighting"
the "epidemic of obesity." Following the nanny-state tradition of declaring war on inanimate or abstract things,
Bloomberg has already launched blitzkriegs on cigarettes, salt, and trans fats, and even proposed to limit alcohol sales
in the city — all in the name of protecting people from themselves.

With crime tamed, New
York Mayor Bloomberg now turns to soda pop. With crime eradicated and every New Yorker fully employed, the three-term
gazillionaire city executive has been focusing recently on government-enforced health edicts to help his taxpayers live longer.
Bloomberg's fought salty foods and bad fats. He's cracking down on pedestrians texting. Now comes soda pop containing sugar.

Armed environmental police shut down ice cream stand.
Armed
environmental police officers shut down a popular long-running ice
cream stand in Massachusetts over the weekend and stood guard to make
sure potential customers
were turned away. The officers claimed that the operator had failed to
secure construction permits to make improvements to the stand. But
operator Mark
Duffy, who has leased the property from the state for 26 years, says
that he has never been required to get permits to make improvements.

Davis High fined for soda sales violation.
Davis
High School has been fined $15,000 after they were caught selling soda
pop during lunch hour, which is a violation of federal law. [...]
"Before lunch you can come and
buy a carbonated beverage. You can take it into the cafeteria and eat
your lunch, but you can't first go buy school lunch then come out in the
hallway and buy a
drink," said Davis High Principal Dee Burton.

The Editor says...
From this experience the students will learn about hair-splitting big-government legalism and litle else.

School fined $15K for selling soda.
The
$15K to pay the fine will come from funds normally used for the
school's music program, art department and sports. That should make
for some better, more well rounded students, eh?

Apparently We're Too Stupid To Run Our Own
Lives. A young mother I know recently said, "When I saw the
president on TV telling us how to wash our hands, I knew this country
was coming to an end. I'm 30 years old and I don't need the government
to tell me how to wash up or what foods are good for me."
For that matter, I told her, how about those light bulbs we're supposed
to buy — the ones that are more expensive; made in China and
require a hazmat team to clean up if they break?

The Feds' Intrusions Into
American Farms and Families. According to The Raleigh Telegram,
"the rule would have prevented children younger than 16 from doing
'agricultural work with animals and in pesticide handling, timber
operations, manure pits and storage bins' while also forbidding them
from using
'power-driven equipment' and working in the 'cultivation, harvesting and
curing of tobacco.'" Can you imagine? What's next? The
feds' crackdown making it illegal for kids to wash dishes, because a
knife might cut them?

House overturns school bake sale ban.
State
lawmakers overturned a controversial ban on school bake sales this
afternoon after a fierce public outcry over school nutrition guidelines
that also
prohibited pizza, white bread and 2 percent milk. "That is the
stupidest thing I've seen in my career," state Rep. Cory Atkins
(D-Concord), moments
after the House unanimously voted to ease the statewide cupcake
crackdown. "Talk about hitting the nerve of government reaching far
into people's lives."

Obama
administration scraps child labor restrictions for farms. The Labor Department withdrew a proposed rule
Thursday [4/26/2012] that would have limited the work that children can perform on farms. The proposal drew heavy
criticism from rural-state lawmakers and agricultural leaders, who cast the rule as government overreach that would erode
the traditional American family. Others in Congress supported the rule, and unions argued it was needed to make
farm work safer for young adults.

Bloomberg
Bans Home-Cooked Meals for the Homeless. Hey homeless people, no soup for you. So says New York City Mayor
Michael Bloomberg, who has banned private food contributions to homeless shelters because he's afraid they won't meet his
exacting nutritional standards.

Children of the State. At least two parents have
come forward with stories of federal agents inspecting the bag lunches of their small children, pronouncing them nutritionally
unfit, and compelling the parents to pay for government-approved school lunches instead. One of the kids got her hands
on a signed memo from the school principal, discussing the USDA requirements for acceptable bag lunches, and clearly stating
that "students who do not bring a healthy lunch will be offered the missing portions, which may result in a fee from the
cafeteria." In essence, this boils down to treating the parents as if they were wayward children.

Democrats
sneak Uncle Sam into your bedroom. [Scroll down] Politicians are like drug dealers. Once
you're addicted to freebies, you suddenly realize the free lunch is not so free. Like the drug dealers, the
politicians want your money, to be sure, but what they really covet is your submission. They love telling
you what to do and they always claim it's for your own good.

How One Bureaucrat Almost Succeeded in Banning
Car Radios. [Transportation Secretary Ray] LaHood's latest
attempt to revise the rules of the road in response to hysterical
fears about in-car technology is nothing new. The proliferation of the
cellular phone in the late 1990s was met with a similar response,
as was the advent of the car phone in the preceding decade. In fact,
the state's attempt to engineer the ideal driving
experience — during which the automobilist's hands are always at
10 and 2, his eyes glued to the road, his ears pricked
only for the sounds of emergency vehicles and the laughter of children
bouncing their balls too close to the street — dates
back to 1930s Massachusetts, and a man named George A. Parker.

"Put down
the iCarly lunchbox and back away slowly!" [This story is] not about whether chicken nuggets
from a school cafeteria are more or less healthy than whatever parents choose to feed their kids. It's
not about whether a homemade lunch meets a government agency's "necessary guidelines." It's about the fact
that there are "necessary guidelines" in the first place, and now they're even sending agents around to enforce
them. It's about yet another busybody government bureaucracy intruding into yet another aspect of our
daily lives.

Permission slips for school cookies.
The West Virginia Legislature continues to be a marvel of bureaucratic bullying. Lawmakers plan to make
possession of Sudafed without a prescription a felony worth up to 10 years in prison. Now Democratic
Delegate Ralph Rodighiero of Logan County wants to regulate Christmas cookies at school — along with
Halloween candy and peeps at Easter. Delegate Rodighiero introduced House Bill 2191 without co-sponsors.
It would restrict "parents or the school to serve sweets during the holidays if the school receives parental or
guardian consent."

Pelosi:
'My Work in Politics' Is 'An Extension of My Role as a Mom'. House Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that she views her role in politics as an extension of her role as a
mother. ... Pelosi said, "Look, I am a mom and a grandmother. I view my work in politics as
an extension of my role as a mom. There are things we want to do for our children that are
simply beyond us."

Day Care
Centers Mandate Milk and Race Of Dolls. Day care centers in Colorado may have to meet new rules
that regulate everything from the race of dolls to how much TV kids can watch. ... [For example,] Children over
2 years old shall be served 1 percent, 2 percent or skim milk (unless directed in writing by
a child's health care provider).

Top 10 Most Egregious Government Regulations.
[#10] Multicultural doll mandate: The Colorado Department of Human Services is proposing new rules to
require all day care centers in the state to have dolls available that represent the three different races.
The guideline is part of a 98-page document that sets new rules for child care that include what kids can drink,
how long they can watch TV, and mandates for field trips and sunscreen use. One wonders how the state, which
has been working on the measure since 2006, will go about enforcing the law.

Tobacco-style
food regulations? The federal government has a growing interest in the eating habits of Americans
for the same reason it has an interest in tobacco consumption, said Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of the
Department of Health and Human Services. The reason is money, because three-quarters of medical-spending
is driven by chronic diseases, such as obesity and tobacco-related diseases, she said.

I Don't Care If You're Fat.
I don't care if you're fat. I don't care if your kids are fat. It's none of my business. If you
want to lose some weight, be my guest. Or, like Michelle Obama, if you just want to have a juicy hamburger,
some fries, and a chocolate shake, that's fine, too. ... I don't care. It is none of my business if you're
fat. It is surely not the government's business if you're fat.

Feds want us
to live like children. We spend the first part of our lives trying to grow up, and, apparently,
millions of us spend the rest of our lives hoping to live like children. How else to explain the desire
to "save" Social Security and Medicare? Since 1935 for Social Security and 1965 for Medicare, older
Americans have expected government to take care of them, as if they are children incapable of taking care of
themselves. Nanny state, indeed.

Emergency
alert system set to launch. If you get an urgent message on your cell phone from President Obama
later this year, it's not a prank. Under a new emergency notification system being announced tomorrow by
Mayor Bloomberg and federal officials, anyone carrying an "enabled" mobile device within range of a cell phone
tower would be alerted what to do in case of emergency.

No need to vote on this — the mayor
knows what's best for you.Menino
Bans Sugary Drink Sales On Boston City Property. Mayor Tom Menino issued an executive order to
ban the sale of sugary drinks on Boston city property on Thursday. "I want to make this a healthier
choice, the easier choice in people's daily lives, whether it's the schools, the work sites or other places
in the community," Menino said.

Menino
expands sugary drink ban. Mayor Thomas M. Menino said yesterday [4/7/2011] that he is
expanding his ban on sugar-sweetened drinks in schools to include all city properties and functions, a
sweeping restriction that means that calorie-laden soft drinks, juices with added sugar, and sports drinks
like Gatorade will no longer be offered in vending machines, concession stands, and city-run meetings,
programs and events.

Boston
Mayor Thomas Menino KOs Soda, OKs Alcohol. Boston Mayor Thomas Menino has banned soda, sports
drinks and sweetened ice teas from city property, according to a recent government press release. In
an attempt to reduce the city's rising obesity rates, Menino has banned all sugary drinks from city vending
machines, cafeterias and concession stands, just one day after reaching an agreement with the Boston Red
Sox that allows the team to sell mixed drinks at its ballpark.

School Lunch
Madness. About one third of American kids are now overweight, and poorer children are the
most likely to be in that category. So, educators are correct to be concerned about the nutritional
welfare of their students. Every school should be encouraging good health, right? But
forcing parents to buy school food is going too far. This is nanny state stuff. I know
that under President Obama the nation is heading in that direction, but it is now time to pause and
smell the meatloaf.

Feds lead charge for alcohol
detector. A quick-check alcohol detector designed to stop drunks from driving off was
hailed yesterday [1/28/2011] by U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood as a jump forward in the
war against drunken driving, while also raising concerns about nanny-state intrusions.

When
Agencies Rule Our Lives. Am I the only one becoming increasingly concerned about the
amount of power federal agencies have over every aspect of our lives? Everywhere we turn it
seems some agency is telling Americans what they can and can't do, whether it's the health care we need,
the technology we use, the financial decisions we make, the food we eat or the air we breathe.

It takes a vittle: First lady
engineers government takeover of children's food. The Obama administration is committed to
bringing more government into the lives of Americans. First lady Michelle Obama grabbed the spotlight
Monday at the District's Harriet Tubman Elementary School to promote an anti-obesity initiative in service of
this goal. She seeks to shift responsibility for feeding America's children away from parents and into
the hands of Washington bureaucrats. Declaring childhood breakfast, lunch and dinner menu options an
issue of national security, Mrs. Obama asserted, "We can't just leave it up to the parents."

Michelle's free lunch:
This free lunch bill, is not quite the free lunch it appears to be; it is paid for by reductions in funding for
food stamps where people can actually select what food to buy for their kids, say potatoes or potato chips, in
their food desserts. And why do so many kids get "half their daily calories from school meals"?
This is another area of responsibility removed from the parent(s) and handed over to the government; parents
don't even have to make their kids lunch to take to school.

Should We Ban Walking While
Wired? You've had the experience of walking along and negotiating around someone who is walking
slowly, weaving, or bumping into other pedestrians for an obvious reason: He or she is talking on a cell
phone, listening to an iPod, or texting on a Blackberry. And you've had the natural, inevitable response
to this annoyance: demanding a law to prevent it.

Distracted while strolling.
I'm too old to need a crossing guard to look after me at public intersections, and if I did, I wouldn't pick
New York state senator Carl Kruger (D-Brooklyn) to do the job. Kruger's the guy who wants to ban
"distracted walking" by pedestrians on public roadways. According to The New York Times, the bill he's
introduced in Albany "would ban the use of mobile phones, iPods or other electronic devices while crossing
streets."

Pennsylvania
builders unhappy with state-imposed sprinkler mandate. While many Pennsylvanians celebrated the
arrival of 2011 on New Year's Eve, home builders in the state likely did not blow their bugles and pop their
poppers with quite as much exuberance. That is because this year marks the beginning of a new government
mandate in Pennsylvania requiring that all new one- and two-family homes have an automatic fire sprinkler
system — a feature that costs thousands of dollars.

The
Political Assassination of a Prescription Drug. After use of Avandia for years by millions
of patients, objective evaluation of its long-term effectiveness and safety has been taken out of the hands
of physicians. Instead we must rely on the verdict of politicians. Medical decisions by agents of
government, like the FDA, inevitably and necessarily become political decisions. We cannot remove the
politicians from these decisions without first removing the FDA.

Department
of Transportation new rules will make cars more expensive. Thought that new car was expensive
now? Wait till the Department of Transportation implements its latest plan to protect Americans from
themselves. Last week, the department announced regulations that would require all new vehicles to install
video cameras on their back bumpers. The idea is to make backing up safer, and it's not optional.

Helmet
laws make absolutely no sense. If you have a strong disregard for your own health and safety, you are free
to express it in all sorts of ways. You can smoke cigarettes. You can gorge on fast food five times a day.
You can go live among bears in Alaska. You can stagger through the worst part of town at 2 a.m. You can
become a trapeze artist. You can join the Marine Corps. But if federal regulators get their way, you will not
be able to ride a motorcycle without a helmet.

Ray
LaHood: Obama's Power-Mad Cell Phone Czar. America is in debt past its eyeballs. Unemployment
remains stuck near double digits. Small and large businesses, unions and insurers are clamoring for Obamacare
waivers in droves. Jihadists are making a mockery of homeland security. And border chaos reigns. So,
what's one of the Obama administration's top domestic policy agenda items this month? Combating distracted drivers.

Transportation
Secretary is out of control. Ever since assuming his Transportation post early in 2009,
[Transportation Secretary Ray] LaHood has been hell-bent to use the power of that position as a launching
pad from which to target cell phone use in vehicles. And he is serious about it; efforts by his
subordinates to downplay his words to the contrary notwithstanding. Facts and the Constitution
pose no speed bumps for this effort to restrict the liberty of those who drive America's roads in
privately-owned vehicles. A study published earlier this year by the Highway Loss Data Institute,
for example, shows that cell phone bans in three states did not lead to fewer car accidents.

The Unfriendly Skies. We
take risks each and every time we step out of our homes and don't need the government to decide for us which
risks are acceptable. So why, according to the Federal Aviation Administration, must our seats be in
their original and upright position as we begin our descent, a full 20 minutes before we land? What
are the actual risks to unclipping our seat belts seconds before the plane has come to a full and complete
stop? Why can't we use our cell phones while taxiing at LAX, but can do so at Heathrow?

Big brother
in the backseat. It's classic bait and switch. Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) claims that his
ROADS SAFE Act — which authorizes a $60 million taxpayer investment in a government program
to further develop sophisticated in-vehicle technology that would keep a car from starting if the driver's
Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) level was above a pre-set limit — is all about stopping drunk
drivers. ... That's the bait. Here's the switch: This taxpayer-funded federal program, known as
DADSS (Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety), is actually developing alcohol detection technology to
come as standard equipment in all cars.

San
Francisco pol wants to take the joy out of a Happy Meal. Toys that have been synonymous with
kids' meals at fast-food restaurants could soon be banned in San Francisco under a new law proposed Tuesday
[8/10/2010] if the food contains too much fat, sugar or salt. Earlier this year, Santa Clara County
became the first local government in the nation to adopt such a law, but it only applies to unincorporated
areas and affects a handful of restaurants.

Michelle
Obama to women planning a pregnancy: 'No fatties'. You might think you were doing a pretty
good job of running your own life before you'd ever even heard of Michelle Obama, but she knows better than
that. Your kids are big fat pigs and so are you, says the First Lady of the United States.

Obama puts his cook in charge of your diet.Obama's personal
cook made Senior Policy Advisor. President Barack Obama (D) is treating his multi gazillion
dollar spend our way out of debt and unemployment stimulus as his own private make work program, tossing
taxpayer dollars to favored constituents, such as unions, and to favored areas, such as his home city of
Chicago. And now he's making it even more private, choosing his family's personal cook, Sam Kass,
imported from Chicago, as... Senior Policy Advisor for Healthy Food Initiatives.

A
Food Czar? Really? You may laugh about the White House assistant chef being appointed
"Senior Policy Adviser." You'll stop laughing when you realize that those in power really do want
to tell you what to eat.

Bill Would Require Government to Track Body Mass of American
Children. A bill introduced this month in Congress would put the federal and state governments in
the business of tracking how fat, or skinny, American children are. States receiving federal grants
provided for in the bill would be required to annually track the Body Mass Index of all children ages 2
through 18.

FDA Trying to Save People From Themselves.
The Food and Drug Administration finds it necessary to warn the American public that swallowing an over-the-counter
medication meant to be rubbed on the skin can have harmful effects.

No Pop for the Poor.
New York City's mayor wants the federal government to say food stamps can't be used to buy soda — a story
that is less about the technicalities of welfare and more about political paternalism. Now, there's a strong
argument to be made that if the government is setting the table and preparing the dinner, it should be able
to choose the menu.

Federal War on Salt Could
Spoil Country Hams. If the food police get their way, North Carolinians can kiss their country
hams, bacon, and fresh Bright Leaf hot dogs goodbye. These Southern specialties might not disappear
altogether, but, if the health agency's crusade against salt is successful, they never would taste the
same again.

It's A
Gateway Spice: FDA Wants To Regulate Salt. The Food and Drug Administration is planning an
unprecedented effort to gradually reduce the salt consumed each day by Americans, saying that less sodium in
everything from soup to nuts would prevent thousands of deaths from hypertension and heart disease. The
initiative, to be launched this year, would eventually lead to the first legal limits on the amount of salt
allowed in food products.

The Editor says...
I'd rather take my chances with too much salt than with too much government.

Big Brother Becomes Big
Bully. The government in the Age of Obama has gone beyond the big brother that watches out and
cares for us. Instead, it has becomes the big brother that torments and bullies us and then takes what
is rightfully ours: our savings, our freedom, and our futures. Liberals are often labeled as
wanting to bring out the nanny state (the feminine version of a big brother). This is wrong. A
nanny cares for her wards so that they can mature into responsible adults able to take care of themselves.
But a bully has other desires.

Behavioral economics — the
governing theory of Obama's nanny state. Just as Obama is a liberal Democrat who, his admirers
insist, isn't really a liberal Democrat, behavioral economics proposes government regulation that, behavioral
economists insist, isn't really regulation. Under the influence of libertarian paternalism, regulators
abandon their old roles as mini-commissars and become "choice architects," arranging the everyday choices that
members of the public face in such a way that they'll naturally do the right thing — eat well,
conserve energy, save more, drive safely, floss.

New
law to require home carbon monoxide detectors. California homeowners will be required to install
carbon monoxide detectors starting in July 2011 under a bill signed Friday [5/7/2010] by Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger that is aimed at preventing deaths and injuries caused by poisoning from the odorless,
colorless gas.

The Editor says...
Carbon monoxide is dangerous, but so is government intrusion. Yes, you should have a carbon monoxide
detector and a smoke detector in your house. But the purchase should be your choice — not
the state's.

The Left Squashes
Life's Little Pleasures. [Scroll down] If this were isolated, it would be worth mentioning
only in the context of wondering why people who run mental health — and most other activist —
organizations seem to have little common sense. ... But the Left has problems with much else as well:
smoking (including cigars and pipes); virtually all kids games that can make a kid feel at all bad or get
hurt; wood-burning fireplaces; cars; most jokes or any flirting in the workplace; incandescent light bulbs;
cool homes in summer; and more.

It's the Contempt.
Perhaps Obama and the Democrats are in denial. But I think it's more properly seen as contempt. They
simply don't care what voters think, for they know best. That's the entire premise of ObamaCare. Voters
who may be young and healthy can't be trusted to decide to self-insure or buy cheap, high-deductible plans.
Employers can't be trusted to balance health care, salary, and other employee benefits in deciding how to
compensate their employees.

Egg Panels. The first thing you notice are the
lines. A line to get your ID bracelet. A line to pass through the metal detector. A line to enter
the South Lawn. A line for the bathroom. Even a line to escape. The White House Easter Egg
Roll on Monday was a revealing look at the Obama administration's love of social
engineering — and a chilling glimpse of what fate may befall the American people if they
fail to rise up against it.

Nanny state will turn U.S. into Europe. Throughout the
health care battle, President Barack Obama asked, if European nations can deliver expansive universal health
care to every citizen, why can't the United States do the same. The president, an ardent Europhile,
poses that question about everything from high-speed rail to cheap college tuition. The answer is that
we can — if we're willing to live a European lifestyle.

Whose Body Is It?
Who owns you, and who should control what you put into your body? In what sense are you free if you
can't decide what medicines you will take?

"Mama
Government" Treats Americans Like Small Children. We now live in a country where the government educates us,
gives us food stamps and school lunch programs when we're hungry, gives us money when we lose our jobs, frets constantly
about differences in free market salaries, orders home loans to be given to people who can't afford them, bails out failing
companies, and provides for our retirement.

Obama's
nanny care insults the American spirit. You are victims. You are helpless against the wiles
of big corporations and insurance companies and you need protection. You need the government to take over
and do things you cannot do for yourself. That is the thinking of what David Brooks calls "the educated
class" that favors the Democrats' health care bills.

5
Ways Liberals Misjudge the American People: [Scroll down slowly] Why would anyone need
a SUV or a gun? You don't REALLY need those things. Also, liberals know what your salary should
be, how your children should be taught, and what words you should be allowed to use without hurting anyone
else's feelings. Oh, you want to pick your own lightbulb? Nonsense: You might do it wrong!
Let liberals tell you which one you need. There's just something about liberalism that turns most of its
practitioners, no matter how dumb or incompetent they may be, into finger wagging professors who want to
lecture the rest of the country about how to live their lives.

Who's going to check?Feb. 18
is deadline for bedroom smoke detectors. City residents who don't have smoke detectors in their bedrooms
will have to get their tools out soon. An amendment to the city housing code will require residents to install
smoke detectors in their bedrooms by Feb. 18.

The Editor says...
Whatever happened to the people who wanted to keep the government out of our bedrooms?

Obama wants school vending
machine changes. The Obama administration will ask Congress to improve childhood nutrition by
ridding school vending machines of sugary snacks and drinks and giving school lunch and breakfast to more kids.

Child
Obesity in the Nanny State: Good intentions aside, a presidential task force isn't going to do
what millions of American parents already don't do — namely, pull the plug on the 68 percent
of kids with televisions in their bedrooms, or on the average 53 hours per week that "Generations M's"
(8-to-18-year-olds) spend engaged with electronic media. Nor will the task force change the way most
families eat.

New 2010 laws: Cooking to texting.
From same-sex marriage in New Hampshire to payday loans in Kentucky, new state laws taking effect on New Year's
Day will change the way people live. California becomes the first state to bar restaurants from cooking
with trans fat — partially hydrogenated oils that have been linked to strokes and heart disease.

Stop Me Before
I Call Again. Gavin Newsom is at it again. The San Francisco mayor's latest foray into
annoying nanny statism is a proposal, reported in The Chronicle last week, to require the city's cell phone
retailers to post the radiation levels of their products. ... Newsom wants to require cell phone companies
to post warnings for an ostensible cancer threat that has not been established.

Michelle:
$373 million in stimulus money for better vending machine food. First Lady Michelle Obama visited the
headquarters of the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington Tuesday [10/13/2009]. She devoted much of
her talk to "the growing threat of obesity, particularly childhood obesity" in the United States, and she touted HHS's
recently-announced plan to spend $373 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on plans to, among
other things, improve the healthfulness of foods in vending machines.

New Government Policy Imposes Strict Standards on Garage
Sales Nationwide. Americans who slap $1 pricetags on their used possessions at garage sales or bazaar events
risk being slapped with fines of up to $15 million, thanks to a new government campaign. The "Resale Round-up,"
launched by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, enforces new limits on lead in children's products and makes it illegal
to sell any items that don't meet those limits or have been recalled for any other reason.

NyQuil
Survives Nanny State Police, For Now. It was touch and go for NyQuil's manufacturer, Procter &
Gamble, yesterday [6/30/2009] while a panel of experts met to decide its fate. The panel was considering
whether to recommend the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pull the popular, over-the-counter cold medicine
from the market because a relatively small number of consumers ingest too much of the product which contains
the pain medicine, acetaminophen.

The Editor says...
It is not the government's responsibility to protect us from ourselves, especially when only a few
people are misusing a legal product. I've heard that Indians drink Aqua Velva
[1]
[2]
[3], but that's
no reason to outlaw it.

Obama's new
financial regs — worse than we imagined. Hey kids! Let's create a brand,
spanking, new federal bureaucracy to protect consumers of mortgages, credit cards, and other financial
instruments from their own stupidity! That's just one of the nanny state goodie being proposed by the
Obama administration to address what they say were the causes of the financial meltdown. ... Surely some loans
were made by criminals. The laws are already in place to deal with them. But how can you
close a "gap" in the stupidity of the borrower? Never fear, the government is here!

Restaurants sizzling over city tax on frying oil.
During some recent restaurant industry audits, the city [of Denver] has claimed separate sales tax on frying oil, claiming
that the oil is a separate product because it is not absorbed into the product. Try telling that to a cardiologist
who wants you to cut down on French fries.

FDA Takes Cheerios
to Task for Boastful Labels. President Obama isn't just rewriting rules regulating the environment and
the financial markets — he is also going after the food industry. Target and example No. 1:
Cheerios. "Based on claims made on your product's label," the FDA said in a letter to manufacturer General Mills,
"we have determined (Cheerios) is promoted for conditions that cause it to be a drug because the product is intended for
use in the prevention, mitigation and treatment of disease." If the government's enforcement action against
Cheerios were to hold up, the cereal would be pulled from grocery shelves and consumers would need a prescription
to buy a box of those little oats.

Uh-oh, Cheerios. The latest
verdict from the Food and Drug Administration is that Cheerios is a drug. Parents, then, must be drug pushers.
The FDA sent a warning to Cheerios maker General Mills Inc. that it is in serious violation of federal rules.

Soft tyranny: Tocqueville envisioned a
ruling power that would be "absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority
of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary,
to keep them in perpetual childhood...

Motor industry
slams speed-curbing trial. [Scroll down] It is linked to a GPS navigation system and
sounds a chime if the car exceeds the limit. It can cut fuel supply to the engine, reducing speed, if
the driver fails to slow down.

Euroamericans? What worries me
about Obama is not the specifics of the nationalization of GM and Chrysler, the government rescue of the United Auto
Workers, the effort to take over college financing, proposed universal health care, massive deficits and tax increases,
although they are worrisome and only the beginning, but the attendant culture of 'inflate your tires' and 'wash your
hands' paternalism. I think we are entering an age in which the federal government will increasingly guide our
thoughts into what is deemed correct — the sort of car we must drive, the type of salary we should make, the sort
of job we should have, even the type of thoughts we are to express, and all in the name of collective brotherhood.

Taking a bite out of crime...Pennsylvania Pie Fight: State Cracks Down on
Baked Goods. On the first Friday of Lent, an elderly female parishioner of St. Cecilia Catholic Church
began unwrapping pies at the church. That's when the trouble started. A state inspector, there for an annual
checkup on the church's kitchen, spied the desserts. After it was determined that the pies were home-baked, the
inspector decreed they couldn't be sold.

The Fed's Plan is More Scary Than the Bird
Flu. Like many Americans, I have been mildly interested, if not amused, watching the parade of
warnings — some quite dire — about the possibility of a bird flu pandemic. The
feds have spent billions of dollars preparing for a pandemic that most experts predict will not occur.

The Repugnance of
Socialism: No fully-grown human being with a single ounce of self-respect ever wants to
be taken care of by others. No person with dignity will tolerate being told what to do, what to think,
how to work or how to be an "acceptable" person. No free man or woman will tolerate the loss of liberty
in exchange for material comfort.

Watch
Those Calories, City Tells Subway Riders. These days, the New York City subways seem to be
filled with advertisements carrying prominent, unmissable public-service messages: Watch out for
second-hand smoke. Call 311 if you see a homeless person who needs help. Be on the lookout for
signs of child abuse. Don't harass women. Now the authorities have a new message for subway
riders: Watch those calories.

Free lunch "safety":
Some people can die from eating ordinary wholesome foods like salmon or peanut butter. If the government banned
every food that was fatal to someone, we might all die of malnutrition. If a drug is not safe, neither is
the illness for which the drug is prescribed. Nor are alternative drugs likely to be perfectly safe,
since nothing else is. Life involves weighing alternative risks, whether in football, pharmaceutical
drugs, or a thousand other things.

Taking
liberties: In New York City, where Mayor Michael Bloomberg has become a champion of a supposedly
new "post-partisan" movement of for-your-own-good-government, trans fats are off the menu. Smoking has
become the ceremony of heretics and outlaws. In 2006 alone, New York City banned — or attempted
to ban — pit bulls; trans fats; aluminum baseball bats; the purchase of tobacco by 18- to
20-year-olds; foie gras; pedicabs in parks; new fast-food restaurants (but only in poor neighborhoods);
lobbyists from the floor of council chambers; vehicles in Central and Prospect parks; cellphones in upscale
restaurants; the sale of pork products made in a processing plant in Tar Heel, N.C.; mail-order
pharmaceutical plans; candy-flavored cigarettes; the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus;
and Wal-Mart.

New York State Bans Insect Foggers.
New York has become the first state in the nation to force the removal of insect foggers — often known as bug
bombs — from store shelves and require the devices be operated only by certified pesticide professionals. For
the average homeowner facing cockroach or other insect problems, that means a simple, effective, and inexpensive
treatment option is no longer available.

Creating the Great American Potato
Famine? McDonald's just agreed to pursue pesticide-free potatoes for its restaurants.
The anti-technology zealots pushing this organic move had better hope the company drags its feet — or
we risk having the first McDonald's in history with no French fries. Less than a decade ago, the
Danish government's high-level Bichel technical committee concluded that an organic-only mandate would
cut Danish potato production by 80 percent.

Crackberry Crunch: Techno
"addiction" is plainly becoming both a social phenomena and a growing social problem in our age. As
such, it can only be a matter of time before nanny-governments — it being none of their
business — insist on manufacturers devising warnings or even spamming us to that effect.

The Credit Card Congress.
The House voted mostly along party lines late last month to pass something called the Credit Cardholders'
Bill of Rights. Given the current financial turmoil, the last thing Congress should do is undercut
access to credit and increase its price. This bill would do both. The legislation, sponsored by
New York Democrat Carolyn Maloney, is intended to address supposedly unfair and deceptive credit card
practices.

Some
recent laws seen as protecting Dallas residents from themselves. At the decade's dawn, Dallasites could
smoke in restaurants, walk their dogs without carrying a pooper-scooper and stroll through downtown or South Dallas
without being monitored by police video cameras. Children, meanwhile, were free to run through parks playing with
their toy six-shooters. Homeless people could beg for money at will. Today, no more — the Dallas
City Council has since deemed such actions illegal and subject to stiff fines.

The
Lawnmower Men: Al Gore blew into Washington on Thursday, warning that "our very way of
life" is imperiled if the U.S. doesn't end "the carbon age" within 10 years. No one seriously
believes such a goal is even remotely plausible. But if you want to know what he and his acolytes
think this means in practice, the Environmental Protection Agency has just published the instruction
manual. Get ready for the lawnmower inspector near you.

Anti-DWI interlocks considered for ALL drivers.
The New York Times [10/21/2007], in an article that may not have been widely noticed because it was buried
in the Automotive section, reports that automakers and researchers, with U.S. government funding, are working
on anti-drunk-driving interlocks that ALL drivers will have to pass in order to drive their cars, whether or
not they have a record for DWI.

Activists Battle Mental Health Screening
Law. Two years after a new law was passed in Illinois creating the framework for schools to
screen students for mental health disorders, the state has saved more than $44 million in hospital costs,
according to a report released in early October. But some groups say the alleged cost savings do not
justify a program under which schools are overstepping their authority. They also say it imposes a
mandatory, universal plan to screen all children from birth through 18.

Nanny State Makes a Poor Babysitter for
Americans. Recently, the Economist ran a cover story on what the magazine called "soft
paternalism." The article focused on the emerging idea among some public policy thinkers that
too many Americans make "bad" decisions. Thus, we need government to nudge us in the right
direction, be it through sin or vice taxes, public relations campaigns, or in some cases,
outright prohibitions.

Nanny
State. Frontpage Interview's guest today is David Harsanyi, an award-winning columnist at The
Denver Post. … He is the author of the new book, Nanny State: How Food Fascists, Teetotaling Do-Gooders, Priggish Moralists, and other Boneheaded Bureaucrats are
Turning America into a Nation of Children.

Peanut allergies

This section is now located here.A New
Declaration of Independence. We don't want other people's dough and we don't want other
people taking ours. We want to start our own businesses without being overregulated and overtaxed.
We want to educate our kids where and how we see fit. Whereas the Takers are trying to turn America
into France — where most everybody is dependent on government in one way or another —
we Leave-Us-Aloners believe what our Founders believed. We believe that government should handle the
basics, then butt out….Portion Control: It's
What's (Left) For Dinner. Worried you haven't been hearing enough bad ideas lately? Be sure
to check out the Food and Drug Administration's new report on food and obesity. Chief among the report's
recommendations is that restaurants should adopt portion controls on what they serve to customers.

Why
Are Americans Giving Up Their Freedom? Dispensing with the idea of limited government in realm of
benefits has meant dispensing with the idea of any limits to government power at all. Once we accept the
notion that government should ensure that our pursuit of happiness succeeds, we have accepted the notion that
government has the right to define what a happy life should look like. We can call this trend the
encroachment of the "nanny state," which it is, or the spread of "liberal fascism," which it also is.
But it is also the inevitable result of Americans' increasing desire to have government guarantee that more
and more aspects of our lives turn out all right.

Safety first. The
safety first movement has begun its attack on school playgrounds. Their first target: Swing
sets. Yes, Plano Independent School District (in an upper class suburb of Dallas) has been
convinced to remove swing sets from playgrounds at all 40 local elementary schools. The
move, Plano ISD says, will make recess safer.The Editor says...
This situation is probably the result of an overabundance of ambulance-chasing lawyers, not just
overprotective liberal do-gooders.

Pin
the Tail on the Donkey Deemed 'Safety Risk'. The traditional children's party game pin the tail
on the donkey is under threat because parents consider it a health and safety risk. The claim comes from
retailers and parenting experts who say mothers and fathers are increasingly reluctant to put pins into the
hands of youngsters.The Editor says...
I'm so glad there weren't any "parenting experts" around when I was a kid, and only a few lawyers.

Alcohol Nanny Breathalyzers:
Maybe we ought to think twice before adopting similar measures when it comes to traffic law. Specifically,
when it comes to an idea floated by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) to require that all new cars be fitted
with an ignition interlock that can detect alcohol in the driver's system — and shut the car down if it does.

Zero Tolerance or Unneccessary
Legislation? In New York the trademark jingle of the iconic ice cream truck has
been silenced. In Sacramento you have to use your inside voice on a thrill ride called
the Screamer. And in Murpheesboro, Tenn., the city council implemented a body odor ban on
its workers. Forget your deodorant and you could be breaking the law. … With more and
more schools and local governments telling people what they can't do these days, some say
America has become a nation of bans.

The British government says Santa Claus
is too scary for children. "For very young children, Father Christmas can be terrifying,
and if you are planning a visit from Santa, you'll need to make sure that fearful children are near an
exit." … Children should give "experiences" instead of Christmas presents and stop sending cards
to cut waste, according to government advice.Also in the U.K. ...Family
life faces State 'invasion'. Government surveillance of all children, including information on
whether they eat five portions of fruit and vegetables a day, will be condemned tomorrow [6/27/2006] as a Big Brother
system. Experts say it is the biggest state intrusion in history into the role of parents.

Protecting us from the good
things? Most people think government keeps us safe. It's why the Food and Drug Administration is
regarded as absolutely necessary. It protects us from snake-oil sellers. Who could argue with that? I
will, because years of consumer reporting have taught me that the regulators, by protecting us from bad things, protect
us from good things, too.

What's the alternative?
Without an FDA, how would doctors and patients know which drugs were safe and effective? The same way we know
which computers and restaurants are good — through newspapers, magazines and word of mouth. In a free,
open society, competition gets the information out, and that protects consumers better than government command and
control.

FDA: Friend or Foe? Should a drug be
disapproved whenever it poses a health risk to some people but a benefit to others? To do so would
eliminate most drugs, including aspirin, because all drugs pose a health risk to some people.

Autism
crusade plagued by incaution, illusions. The recently launched crusade to have every child tested
for autism before the age of two has as its reason an opportunity for "early intervention" to treat the
condition. … But the dangers of false diagnoses of toddlers and preschoolers have been pointed out by
Professor Stephen Camarata of Vanderbilt University, who has tested and treated children with autism for
more than 20 years and has encountered many cases of inaccurate diagnoses.

Michigan
close to mandating HPV vaccine. First-in-the-nation legislation requiring HPV vaccinations for
girls entering the sixth grade is headed for a final vote in the Michigan House of Representatives, where a
committee approved the two related bills last week. The Senate already passed the measure.

Warning:
Products Ahead. Hide the children: Commercial products are visible on network television.
That's the urgent message from a clatch of public interest groups who wrote to the Federal Communications Commission
last week demanding an end to "advertainment." … This conspiratorial view of advertising goes back to Vance
Packard and the "Hidden Persuaders," the book unmasking the supposed media manipulation of the 1950s.

Hiring the
Nanny State. With his book "Nanny State," Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi has thrown a
conservative-libertarian rope around a disturbing political and cultural trend — the nannification
of America by moral busybodies and nitpicking maternalists who use government power to micromanage our
personal lives and protect us from ourselves.

Pie menace averted. Members of
the Community Advent Christian Church in Norwalk, Ct. wanted to bake pies this Thanksgiving and donate them to
the city's emergency shelter, but were told that under a state regulation home-baked pies cannot be donated to
the shelter and that any pies that get donated anyway are thrown out, reports the Norwalk Hour.

Big Brother Prescribes: Are mandatory aerobics
classes in your future? "When anyone dies at an early age from a preventable cause in New York
City, it's my fault," New York City Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden declared recently. In his campaign
to make sure that no New Yorker dies before his or her time, Frieden has adopted an expansive notion of public
health. … Safeguarding people from the risks potentially imposed on them by third parties is no longer
enough — Frieden now wants to protect people from themselves.

Twinkies, Smokes, and Fries: The Fallacies
of Sin Taxes. The search for government revenue in fiscally tight times tempts legislators to
raise revenue by imposing unusually high excise taxes on cigarettes, liquor, gambling, and so on.
Recently, we've seen new and creative measures aimed at fatty snacks, fast food, and soft drinks —
proposals familiarly known as "Twinkie" taxes. This type of charge, often called a "sin tax," appeals to
voters who view them as a way of discouraging consumption of certain objectionable products. Yet the
temptation to impose sin taxes is one that should be resisted for both economic and moral reasons.

Aluminum Bats May Go Way of Trans Fat. The [New
York] City Council, already one of the nation's leaders in the attempt to ban trans fats in restaurants, may
be first in the country to ban another potential safety hazard — aluminum baseball bats. On
Monday, the City Council will hold a hearing on legislation that would allow only wooden bats
be used at high school baseball games.Book reviewHazardous to our Health? FDA Regulation of
Health Care Products. In this book, four outstanding scholars examine how the FDA accumulated its enormous
power and what effects it has had on the public. It also explores who actually benefits and loses from FDA
actions, and whether alternatives exist to safeguard the health of Americans. This book raise serious questions
about the wisdom of giving policing power with little oversight or appeal process to scientists, as the FDA currently
does. It also argues forcefully that the FDA unnecessarily delays beneficial medicines and medical devices, many
of which are routinely available in Europe, from being available to Americans.

Protecting us from sunscreen?
People are happily protecting themselves with Mexoryl in South America, Europe, Australia and Canada, but in the USA you
are forbidden to use it. The FDA won't approve it. It won't even say why.

Nanny's guide to
being nice: Good manners abroad, like good manners anywhere, are good, of course. But
the government just can't help being the nanny. Good manners start at home, and you can't take with
you what you haven't packed.

New
Nanny State Push in Britain. As if they don't have enough to worry about already, Britons are being
told by their government to stop smoking, stop eating so much, be more patriotic, drink less wine
and — oh, yes — be more polite. Beginning in July, a sweeping smoking ban comes into
effect throughout Britain, making it illegal to smoke in restaurants, pubs or any public
place under threat of an instant fine of around $100.

"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this
world are to be cured by legislation."

The tyranny of visions.
Visions are powerful things. For some people, visions make facts unnecessary and can even over-ride facts to the
contrary. Even in democratic nations, there are people who can impose their vision on other people, with no
consequences for being wrong and no requirement that they prove themselves right. Social workers have for years
tried to stop white couples from adopting orphans from minority groups because that goes against their vision.
They don't need a speck of evidence to back up their preconceptions.

The tyranny of visions: part
II. California has long had more than its fair share of busybodies with a vision of the world in which it
is necessary for them to force other people to do Good Things. One of the latest examples is a recent ruling by
one of the many busybody commissions in California that people who build houses, or just remodel their homes, will in
the future have to have more fluorescent lights and even install motion sensors to control lights – all in
the name of saving energy.

The tyranny of visions: part
III. Nowhere is the tyranny of visions more absolute than with issues involving safety. Attempts to
talk about costs, trade-offs or diminishing returns are only likely to provoke safety zealots to respond with something
like, "If it saves just one human life, it is worth it!" That immediately establishes the safety zealot as being
on a higher moral plane than those who stoop to consider crass materialistic costs. And being on a higher plane is
what a great deal of zealotry is all about.

The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission Takes a Bite Out of Crime

Undercover
agents target drunks in Texas bars. In one operation in a Dallas suburb, agents from the
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission visited 36 bars and arrested 30 people for
intoxication. Carolyn Beck, the commission's spokesman, said the arrests were designed
to detain drunks before they left bars and behaved in dangerous ways, such as driving.The Editor says...
The TABC is doing this despite two important facts:
1. The inside of a bar is private property, not public. Private
intoxication is not illegal.
2. People sitting in a bar are not driving; therefore, they are not
drunk drivers.

Sometimes common sense eludes public officials.

Texas Arrests Drunk People
in Bars. Some stories are just too stupid to make up and this is one of them. The Texas
Alcoholic Beverage Commission is arresting drunk people in bars to prevent drunk driving.

Public intoxication stings
catch 2,200 in Texas bars. The arrests included people who were drunk in bars, who sold
alcohol to a drunk person, or a drunk employee on the premises of a bar or restaurant with a license
to sell alcohol, said Carolyn Beck, a spokeswoman for the TABC. … Part of the problem with enforcing
the state's code regulating alcohol sales is "people still think that a bar is place to go get
drunk," Beck said.

There's a shocking revelation — people go to bars to get drunk!

TABC Patrolling Bars For Public
Intoxication. If you have a drink in an Austin bar or restaurant, and you do something out of
the ordinary, you could go to jail. The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission says they can spot people
who've had too much to drink, just by looking at them. … TABC busts are up 95 percent over the last
year. Legal experts say there's a reason for that. "TABC is trying to justify their
existence. They think that it is a politically popular thing to get out there and arrest
folks," defense attorney Ken Gibson said.

Lawmakers To Review Bar Busts.
Lawmakers plan to review a state drinking crackdown that uses undercover agents to arrest drunk people in
bars. … Legislators who oversee the commission said they agree with the emphasis on public safety, but
the program should be reviewed to check for abuses and to measure its effectiveness.

We've had our bartender arrested for serving one person two drinks. One was for the
customer's boyfriend, and they attested to this fact at the time. Neither were "falling down drunk."

We had a patron arrested for playing trivia and drinking diet coke. No
alcohol — just caught up in the sting.

While walking from the bar to a cab that he called, a customer was arrested for public intoxication.

And all of it is absurd, especially "saving people from themselves."Exploding the Fireworks Safety "Threat": Though about
70 million of us live in states that allow all sorts of fireworks and firecracker use, 50 million other
Americans who live in nine states, including New York and Arkansas, need a permit to even light a sparkler. …
Safety is the major concern of those who ban our celebratory backyard light and noise shows, but their fears are
overblown. In fact, banning personal use of fireworks may actually result in more accidental fires because some of
those who try to avoid getting caught set them off in remote fields, causing fires that take longer to discover.

Judge allows San Diego Fourth of
July fireworks. A judge says San Diego can go ahead with an oceanfront fireworks display on the
Fourth of July, a decision that also temporarily spares tens of thousands of other local festivities from
rigorous environmental reviews.

Freedom Means Never Having to Take
Down Your Fuzzy Dice. About two-dozen states across the country passed laws micromanaging transportation,
education, business, alcohol, and social issues, while a few struck blows for personal freedom. Freedom means
having personal responsibility and the ability to make certain choices about everyday living that should not be dictated
by the government. It is not the job of the state to make sure people are happier, healthier, and more
productive by making decisions for them.In Canada...Scrap the nanny
state and return our cash. For the most part, we ought to have our money given back to us and
be allowed to spend it on whatever we like. We may make bad choices or good choices -- but choice,
so we are told by the left, is a basic human right. There are the obvious areas of tax abuse, such
as tendentious and political arts funding, competing public broadcasters and government corruption and
inefficiency, all of which should go.

Air Bag Safety Coverup: Americans
ought to be free to choose to have air bags or not. After all the additional safety benefit
air bags provide, for seatbelt wearing passengers, is virtually zero.

Death by Government. Even
after it became known that air bags could kill children and smaller adults the government
continued to insist that they be used, propagandized in favor of their use, and refused to make
them optional. The regulators finally caved in and allowed switch-off devices in 1995, but it
is nearly impossible to find an automotive service center that will install one because of
their liability fears.

Mandatory
seatbelt measure defeated. New Hampshire will remain the only state in the nation not to require
adult drivers and passengers to buckle up. The state Senate, in a bipartisan 16-8 vote, killed a
House-passed bill that would have made failure to wear a seatbelt a primary offense. … While proponents
called the bill a life-saving measure, opponents framed it as a debate about government intrusion on
personal freedom — a case of what one senator termed "nanny state" legislation.

Facts
About State Mandatory Seat Belt Harness Laws: While the use of a seat belt has saved
some people in certain kinds of traffic accidents, there is ample proof that in other kinds, some
people have been more seriously injured and even killed only because of forced seat belt use. … The
public is denied the right to know there is a legitimate contrary side to the seat belt law
controversy. At one time, it was the same with air bags until one investigative reporter
decided to start printing the truth about air bag dangers in certain kinds of traffic accidents.

There's a web site about this specific issue:Seat Belt Choice dot com. There
is a concerted effort from Washington through the National Highway Transportation Safety
Administration to pressure every state in America to enact a primary seat belt law and make
everyone buckle up or lose federal transportation money. A primary law means you can be
stopped solely if you or someone else in your vehicle is not wearing a seat belt. And
if you are stopped, you may be ticketed, fined and perhaps even arrested.

The truth about seat belts: When we read the
instructions to police officers and emergency personnel for filling out the FARS data forms, we learn that all persons
who fell off the bed of a pickup truck or fell off a snowmobile or a three-wheel or four-wheel ATV or from a go-cart are
to be listed as having been "ejected". Moreover, there is no evidence to prove that all the persons who are listed
as having been "ejected" actually were. … When we look at the actual data we find that most of these data points
are coded as "9" which is the FARS code in this category for "unknown". In other words, all they really know in
most cases is that the victims was outside the vehicle when they arrived on the scene.

Seat
belt laws: Primary seat belt laws give law enforcement agents a virtual carte blanche
to conduct traffic stops. Nevada's recent experience proves states don't need more intrusive
statutes to persuade more people to buckle up.The cops aren't always wearing seat belts themselves.No seat belts in 42% of
fatal police car crashes. The study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), which analyzed 733 crashes from 1980 through 2008, comes less than a week after a separate
report found that fatal traffic incidents in 2010 were the leading cause of officer deaths for the 13th
straight year. ... Some officers resist wearing seat belts because the restraints slow their movement in and
out of the cars, Floyd says. Others complain that the straps get tangled in utility and gun belts.

Liberty Versus
Socialism: [Scroll down] Similar justification was used for laws requiring helmets for motorcyclists
and bicyclists. After all, if one exercises his liberty to ride without a helmet, and has an accident and
becomes a vegetable, society has to bear the expense of taking care of him. The fact that an obese person
becomes ill, or a cyclist has an accident, and becomes a burden on taxpayers who must bear the expense of taking
care of him, is not a problem of liberty. It's a problem of socialism where one person is forced to take
care of another. There is no moral argument that justifies using the coercive powers of government to
force one person to bear the expense of taking care of another.

"Protecting" Kids Right off the Playground: Safety
bureaucracies and consumer activist groups routinely invent or exaggerate dangers to maintain their budgets and inflate
their apparent worth. And nothing works better than saving children who are already safe.

Obesity is now an illness, and it can
be covered by Medicare. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson announced [7/15/2004] the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services would remove language in Medicare's coverage manual that states obesity is not an
illness.

Why the State Hates Cholesterol:
Cholesterol is found in every cell of the body. This fascinating molecule, found in rich abundance in the tastiest
of foods, is the most critical component of mental function — surely one reason the State has waged its
historical role on this vilified yet truly magnificent molecule, independent thought being the primary threat to its
existence.

Nanny State Pushes Prohibition. Yet another
scientific report was released recently detailing the health benefits of moderate alcohol consumption. That's
right, the benefits of moderate drinking. But don't expect to hear about this good news from Budweiser or
Bacardi. The Federal Trade Commission prohibits brewers, vintners and distillers from communicating to consumers
any factual information regarding the health benefits of their legal products. The only health-related information
the sellers of alcohol products are allowed by the government to communicate to their customers is those scary warning
labels about potentially negative consequences of drinking.This has "unintended consequences" written all over it...Governor
joins students in Jericho to sign bus idling law. Gov. Jim Douglas used six pens Friday to sign
his name to a bill that will ban school buses from running their engines while parked on school grounds,
except under special circumstances.

Get-Tough Politics: Joe Lieberman
wants nutritional labels placed on the food wrappers at fast-food joints. He wants the government to impose
nutritional standards on the food sold in vending machines in schools. He wants this, he wants that, he wants the
other. Let's get clear on one thing. This isn't about junk food. It's about junk politics. It's
about controlling every single last itty bitty detail of everything anybody ever does.

Under 8? Use a booster
seat. Parents will have to strap their kids into backseat car booster seats until they are eight years old
or reach a certain height if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signs a bill the Legislature sent to him Thursday
[8/24/2006].The Editor says...
Why eight? Why not twelve? Why not 16?

"Click It or Ticket"
History knows of no totalitarianism agenda where noble goals weren't used as justification. Health and safety have
become the American justification for attacks on liberty. Whether seatbelt usage is a good idea is beside the
point, for daily exercise, nutritious meals, eight hours sleep, and cultural and intellectual enrichment might also be
good ideas. The point is whether government has a right to coerce us into taking care of ourselves.

Click it or ticket - Part
II. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, an office within the U.S. Department of
Transportation, just finished its annual campaign to get us to wear our seatbelts under a program called "Click It or
Ticket." States receive federal subsidies to ticket drivers if they or their passengers are not buckled up.
Some states, such as Maryland, are so eager that they've equipped their officers with night vision
goggles….

Victims of Over-Zealous Police
Officers: No one disputes the fact that seat belts save lives. Most states, therefore,
have buckle-up laws that make it a misdemeanor to drive with being properly belted. However, in Texas,
the Transportation Code not only permits a police officer to stop a driver for the non-use of seat belts, it
also permits the officer to arrest the driver for violating that law. Gail Atwater was one of those
unfortunate Texans.

Dangerous Changes in Seat Belt Law: Primary enforcement
allows the police to freely go on a "fishing" expedition to find sometime wrong under the pretense of not using a seat
belt. Primary enforcement resuscitates the once dreaded "general warrants" of King George III of colonial
America against motorists.

Congress Should Repeal V-chip Requirements.
Imagine a law that required printers to encode on the spines of books a bar code that could be used to record ratings
for violent content. If, within a year, publishers and authors had not come up with a rating system for book
violence, a federal agency would be empowered to craft guidelines on their behalf. Publishers would be required to
attach a rating to all the books they published. No one would pretend for a moment that such a system was
voluntary.

Convoy! Originally,
a license was required for Citizens' Band radio, but masses of people simply broke the law
and operated without a license until the FCC was forced to bow to reality. Citizens'
Band radio became popular because of widespread resistance to another example of regulatory
overreach: the unpopular 55-mile-per-hour speed limit.

One Bad
Limit: I'm all in favor of limits, especially term limits. But some
limits are bad. For example, the 55-mile-an-hour federal speed limit. It was
always a dubious claim that it made the highways safer. Most drivers, no matter how
law-abiding, didn't really abide by the 55 mph limit. What they did was worry
about whether there was a cop around.

Safe at any speed in
Virginia. The most concrete achievement in the early days of the Republican congressional
takeover of 1995 was, arguably, the elimination of the hated 55 mph national speed limit. Millions
across the country experienced firsthand the benefit of moving beyond the "Washington knows best" mentality
that had gripped transportation policy since the 1970s.

None Dare
Call It Fascism. If problems were actually solved, all these government
programs and bureaucrats wouldn't be needed. Thus, the crises must be perpetual,
never solved, always requiring another program, another intervention, more taxpayers'
money, more authorities granted, etc. The game is not to solve the problems but
to use them to control people through regulations and subsidies, increasing their
dependency upon the people writing and enforcing the regulations and providing the
handouts. People who are dependent upon you are people who vote for you.

It's Time to Roast the
Pig. The CPSC (US Consumer Product Safety Commission) created in 1972 by Congress, received a
budget of $55,200,000 for the year of 2002. The CPSC spends its time on important issues like having
8,000 "Bottle Cap Bear" key chains recalled because of the possible "choking hazard to young children."
This is typical government; they don't think you are capable of deciding what is safe and what isn't for your
own children.

FTC Outlaws Freedom in the Ice Cream
Market. The FTC is taking what should be a free bargaining process between producer and consumer
and is stacking it in favor of the consumer. Why are people who make ice cream less entitled to equal
protection under the law than people who eat ice cream?

Same story: Life, Liberty,
and the Bureau of Competition: The Federal Trade Commission set a new low
when it announced plans to block a merger between Nestle Holdings, Inc. and Dreyer's
Grand Ice Cream, Inc., two of the world's largest ice cream makers.

The Rise of the Nanny
State examines the origins, goals, and activities of the modern consumer
movement — a movement that, in the words of Tom Holt, "does not address
the needs of consumers. Instead, it serves the bureaucratic interests of governing
elites and the ideological and organizational interests of the movement itself."

Excellent: We
made it. Whenever someone says that this or that government program is
absolutely necessary, I always wonder, "What did people do and how did they survive
before the program?"

California Makes Cars Less
Affordable: California today became the first state in the nation to restrict automobile emissions
of carbon dioxide, the same gas humans exhale. The auto industry pointed out, to no avail, that the
measure would make cars even more expensive and pressure people to buy death traps they don't feel safe driving.

Q: What should I do if I find a rock in a bag of potatoes?A: Simply return the rock to your grocer, who will give you the rock's weight in potatoes.

Protecting Us Out of Our
Rights: It is nobody's business whether I eat eggs sunny side up, drive
without wearing seat belts or pig out on hamburgers and French fries.

Protecting Us Out of Our Rights -
Part II: Some New Jersey localities have a ban on people pumping their own gasoline.
Policemen issue citations for driving without a seatbelt. By law, new cars must be equipped with
air bags. Federal law mandates that all new toilets flush using a paltry 1.6 gallons of water.

The Government Says You're Fat. As if the
government isn't trying to control every aspect of your life, it has now launched a program to determine what
and how much you eat.

The Sin of "Sin Taxes": Taxation is not a
proper venue for government officials to engage in half-baked social engineering programs. One of the
major impediments towards true tax reform in this country is the inability of almost all
politicians — Democrats and Republicans alike — to divorce themselves
from the use of tax policy to indulge their personal whims.

Big Nanny Takes a
Bath: How parents bathe their children should be no one's business — and no one
else's responsibility — but their own. But thanks to pressure from Big Nanny liberals like
New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, the government has torn down the shower curtain and belly-flopped into our
bathwater. In an attempt to rescue inattentive parents from themselves and their children, the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) voted unanimously last week [mid-2001] to regulate
baby-bath seats.

Death by Regulation: Many government
programs increase the death rate among certain groups of people, although it often takes careful statistical
analysis to reveal the connection. Regulations motivated by political correctness are killing
Americans. It's time to face this reality and scrap the regulations. People should be allowed to
choose which risks they wish to assume, which risks to protect themselves against, and how best to do it.

Do American Voters Need Speech
Nannies? Many incumbent members of Congress are eager to provide America's voters with a new
government service — a federal law to protect them from messages about politicians that may
"manipulate" simple-minded voters, especially those communications that are "negative" in tone, or that
will result in "unhealthy" debate.

Editor's Note:
What unmitigated audacity! The US government presumes to own the Moon. Why stop there? Why
not just print a nice-looking deed and sell the Moon to the highest bidder? Or how about raising money
by selling lunar acreage?

Paved
With Good Intentions: Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has introduced Federal
legislation that would prohibit schools from selling soft drinks or "foods of minimal
nutritional value" (read: snacks) during times when breakfast and lunch are served. It
would also give the US Department of Agriculture the power to ban sodas and snacks
outright on school grounds.

The Green Taliban Of
America: The hubris of the Greens has allowed them to dictate to everyone just how we should
conduct our lives for decades. That is why you can't build a home, an office building, a factory, a
hospital or a school, without an "environmental" study. That is why Americans have been steadily deprived
of pesticides, many used safely for decades, to protect us against the diseases spread by insect and rodent
pests. That's why millions of acres of our national forests burned this year because Greens won't let
them be managed through selective logging or to allow roads to be built into those forests. The list
goes on and on because the Greens have been responsible for one third of every law and regulation in the
Federal Register today.

Totally
Committed: What would we do without the California Legislature? How could
we survive without the guidance of environmentalists? Oh how our lives would be
meaningless without the Legislature taking care of our every need. Who else
can protect us from ourselves?

Cell Phone Regulation Federalizes
Traffic Law: Just when you thought there was nothing left for Congress to federalize, along comes
a bill by Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-NY, and Sen. Jon Corzine, D-NJ, that would regulate how Americans use their
cell phones while driving. Apparently no human action is too small or parochial for the federal
government to police. So now Congress wants to play the role of local traffic cop, too.

California Governor Signs Bill
Banning Hand-Held Cell Phones While Driving. The measure will take effect July 1st, 2008
and will make it an infraction to use a hand-held cell phone while driving except to make a call to an
emergency service provider. A first offense will be punishable by a $20 fine. Subsequent
violations will carry $50 fines. It's similar to laws in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and
Washington DC.The Editor says...
It is unfortunate that so many cell phone users have made this kind of legislation necessary through
their irresponsibility and narcissism. But it is also worth noting that laws of this sort have
been created first in the "blue" states, where Democrats predominate.

The War on Margarine: This
year marks the 116th anniversary of the Federal Margarine Act of 1886, part of an
80-year war on butter's toughest competitor. The Act was the capstone of a movement
to prevent consumers from enjoying the cheaper spread, which was introduced in 1874.

They Messed With
Texas: The fight to regulate personal food choices has infected Texas. That state, always
rightly proud of its spirit of self-determination and independence, will now restrict sales of so-called "junk
foods" at all public schools, usurping the role of parents in deciding what their children should and should not eat.

Zero-Tolerance Policy Applied to
Snacks: Controlling kids has become a national priority for schools. Zero tolerance is the
catch phrase for no lenience on students found with drugs, guns, and now candy and soft drinks.

Foreign Policy and Foreign Wars: Once a
government sets itself the task of trying to rectify the errors and choices of its own citizens, it soon
begins sliding down a slippery slope in which the end result is state supervision and regulation of all
of its citizens' activities, and all in the name of a higher "social good."

The people who tried to mandate 1.6 gallon toilets are now pushing
politically
correct washing machines: The Libertarian Party says the
Department of Energy wants to make American consumers pay up to $800 more for
new "environmentally friendly" washing machines that may not work as well
as older models.

Tell Big Brother To Get Out Of Our
Washing Machines: In a back room deal without consumers or taxpayers present, the Clinton-Gore
environmentalists conspired with industry to mandate the manufacture of only front-loading, instead of top-loading,
washing machines. The mandate requires elimination of the agitator which is the element that washes our
clothes. Front-loading washers are available now but they make up less than 12 percent of sales.
So Big Brother's attitude is, let's force people to buy front-loading washers.

Flush Congress. Every
time I flush the toilet, I think of Congress. Well, that's not quite right. Every time I have to
flush twice, I think of Congress. It's been over a decade now that Americans have had to put up with
ineffective toilets, toilets that don't flush properly. In 1992, supposedly to save water, Congress
mandated that all newly manufactured home toilets flush with less water than the industry had previously set as
standard. Instead of flushing with over three gallons of rushing water, toilets were mandated to flush
with no more than 1.6 gallons. And, with this, American frustration with their toilets began
in earnest.

Too Much Safety? You can't put a price on
human life. That's a frequently heard response to safety issues, often accompanied by: If it saves
one life, it's worth it. Walter Williams questions this assumption.

The Smoking Section:

I've never smoked a cigarette in my life, and I certainly would not recommend cigarettes to anyone -- even someone who
is looking for a costly, destructive and deadly habit. Nevertheless, tobacco is a legal product. It is one
of this country's major exports. The decision to light up a cigarette is voluntary, at least at first.
After that, of course, it becomes a matter of addiction.

Of course it's a nasty, smelly habit. Even the smokers themselves will say so. But
passing laws that prohibit smoking is, in my opinion, just a method used by public officials to flex their
muscles and get the public used to accepting more and more intrusive regulations. Just as
with seat belt laws, it's not about public health and safety, it's about control. It's
also about bureaucrats who need to find something to do, in order to perpetuate their jobs.

Americans Have Become Compliant.
Tobacco zealots started out with "reasonable" demands, such as the surgeon general's warning on cigarette packs.
Then they demanded nonsmoking sections on airplanes. Emboldened by that success, they demanded no smoking at
all on airplanes and then airports and then restaurants and then workplaces — all in the name of health.
Seeing the compliant nature of smokers, they've moved to ban smoking on beaches, in parks and on sidewalks in
some cities. Now they're calling for higher health insurance premiums for smokers.Buckle up laws were just the beginning.Unsafe at Any Smoke. A study just
released by the CDC characterizes second-hand smoke as the latest threat to "safety" — and of course, "the
children." It urges what you'd expect: That it be made illegal to smoke in your own car, at least, if "the
children" are present and possibly even if they're not. For as any smoker knows — as anyone who has shopped for
used cars knows — any car that has been smoked in retains the essence of the Marlboro Man for years, even decades
after the last butt was crumpled in the ashtray.

Rules
to spare kids smoky cars urged. In the first national estimate of its kind, a report from government
researchers says more than 1 in 5 high school students and middle schoolers ride in cars while others
are smoking.The Editor says...
Any time the government wants to take away another little piece of your freedom, it is done "for the children".
You will no longer be free to smoke or not smoke in your own car, because Big Brother owns your kids. Here's
a simpler solution: Why not just require smoking drivers to roll down the windows?

President Obama's
top 10 constitutional violations. [#9] Graphic tobacco warnings: Late last year,
the FDA issued regulations requiring cigarette manufacturers to display graphic warnings on all packs of cigarettes
that must cover at least 50% of the packaging and graphically portray tobacco-related illnesses. These
warnings violate the First Amendment because the government is compelling the cigarette manufacturers to discourage
their customers from buying their lawful products.

Big Government Gets
Ugly. The Food and Drug Administration finds it intolerable that despite all the efforts to stamp
out smoking — through tobacco taxes, advertising restrictions, educational campaigns and smoking bans — nearly
50 million Americans continue to puff away. The hope is that repeated assaults with nauseating
photos will kill the urge.

FDA
warning photos faked. Tobacco peddlers will soon be forced to emblazon every package of their
product with graphic new warnings that show what the government says will happen to you if you smoke
cigarettes. ... There is only one problem with the federal government's great campaign of graphic images aimed
at combating the deceit of tobacco companies and rescuing us from our stupid selves. The images are
fabricated.

No More Smoking
For Florida Prisoners. In an effort to reduce healthcare costs at state prisons the Florida
Department of Corrections is moving to make sure their facilities are smoke-free by September. ... "Inmate
smoking and second-hand smoking is costing millions in healthcare costs each year," said Florida Department
of Corrections Secretary Edwin Buss.The Editor says...
It's only a matter of time before this smoking ban faces a court challenge based on the Eighth
Amendment. But in the meantime, it's a step in the right direction, as far as I'm concerned -- not
because I'm opposed to other people smoking, but because prisons should be made as uncomfortable as
legally possible, so the threat of prison time will act as a deterrent to crime.

Surgeon General Jumps the Shark.
Let's all thank Surgeon General Regina Benjamin for demonstrating beyond all doubt last week that nannyism is
more dangerous than smoking. The Office of the Surgeon General just released a report claiming that a
single puff of a cigarette or a single inhalation of second hand smoke can permanently damage one's health and
perhaps lead to death. Now we know what all those blindfolded condemned men given one last puff as they
stood before firing squads really died from.The Editor says...
Wow, they must sell some really potent cigarettes in Regina Benjamin's neighborhood.

Tobacco Report Called
'Unscientific and Potentially Unethical'. The U.S. Surgeon-General's report that even a single
cigarette can harm a person's health is unscientific and potentially unethical, a cigar and pipe trade group
says. According to the report released on Dec. 9 by Surgeon General Regina Benjamin, "there is no
risk-free level of exposure to tobacco smoke." In announcing the report, Benjamin said exposure to
tobacco smoke — even occasional smoking or secondhand smoke — "causes immediate damage
to your body that can lead to serious illness or death."

Cigarette
Warning Labels, Now With More Pictures of Corpses. The nanny-state moves into its self-parody
phase. Behold these (very real, I'm afraid) "larger and more noticeable textual warning statements and
color graphic images depicting the negative health consequences" of smoking, now being proposed by the Department
of Health and Human Services.

The War on Cigarettes.
[Scroll down] Just last month in Virginia, for example, a contraband cigarette smuggler pleaded guilty
in court of hiring a hit man to murder two people that he suspected of stealing his bootleg cigarettes.
According to media reports, the man's gang was hoping to make a cool $1 million by selling nearly 400,000
cartons of cigarettes in New York City — where taxes alone on a pack of smokes are $4.25.
Amazingly, New York lawmakers are seeking to add another $1 to this already obscene amount, an increase which
will only fuel additional bootlegging — and additional violence.

City
Council Readies New Smoking Ban. Attention Times Square denizens and those out for a stroll in
Central Park: It will soon be time to put out your smokes — forever. The New York City
Council is slated Wednesday afternoon [2/2/2011] to approve a ban on smoking in parks, beaches, marinas,
boardwalks and pedestrian plazas like Times Square.This could happen here, too.Doctors banned from smoking.
Doctors in the Philippines have been banned from smoking by the country's medical association to make sure they
set a good example to their patients, the group said on Saturday [9/25/2010].

Assembly approves
smoking ban at state parks and beaches. State lawmakers adopted one of the nation's most far-reaching
regulations of tobacco use Monday, approving a bill to outlaw smoking at 278 state parks and beaches. Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger has not said publicly whether he will sign the measure, which would allow a fine of up
to $100 for smoking at a state beach or in a designated section of a state park. Smoking would still be
allowed in many parking lots and campgrounds.

Mayor
Bloomberg vows to snuff out smoking in parks, beaches. Mayor Bloomberg says he's pushing ahead
with a controversial plan to ban smoking at city parks and beaches, after earlier saying it needed more study.The Editor says...
You can't smoke on the beach? Have you ever been to a beach where the air was so stuffy
that you could smell someone else's cigarette? Every time I've been to the beach in the last 40 years,
there has been plenty of fresh air. Maybe New York beaches are different.

Senate Passes FDA Tobacco Law. The
Senate overwhelmingly passed historic legislation Thursday [6/11/2009] that puts the tobacco industry under the regulation
of the Food and Drug Administration. Companies are weighing the impact of the bill, which they say also puts severe,
perhaps unconstitutional, restrictions on advertising and packaging.

Cigarette Control and Thought Control.
What motivates advocates of stricter tobacco regulation is the unassailable assurance that they are not only
completely right but that their opponents are a) wrong and b) evil. This invigorating certitude
makes it possible to justify almost anything that punishes cigarette companies, even if it does no actual
good — or does actual harm. One of the main purposes of the new law is to reduce the number
of smokers in the name of improving "public health." This is a skillful use of language to confuse
rather than enlighten.

Tobacco and the Rule of Law: On
the one hand, DOJ promoted its novel lawsuit against cigarette makers. On the other hand, the same
watchdog agency stood idly by while tobacco companies and state attorneys general teamed up to violate the
antitrust laws. The multistate tobacco settlement, a cunning and deceitful bargain between the industry
and the states, allows the tobacco giants to monopolize cigarette sales and foist the cost onto smokers.

Anti-Tobacco
Crusaders Boldly Go into Smokers' Homes. During Prohibition, making and selling liquor was illegal,
but drinking it was not. With tobacco, we are moving toward the opposite situation, where it will be legal
to make and sell cigarettes but not to smoke them.

Congress Aims to Put Out Cigarettes.
Congress is taking new whacks at the cigarette industry, banning tobacco sales in Senate buildings and —
more importantly — seeking a significant federal tax increase on cigarettes. The industry, once
a lobbying behemoth, is quietly working against the tax bill. But it lacks the clout it once wielded.

Bill
to Regulate Tobacco Moves Forward. The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved a bill
Wednesday [4/2/2008] that would give the Food and Drug Administration sweeping regulatory authority over
the tobacco industry, clearing the way for a House floor vote on the legislation, which has long been
sought by anti-tobacco activists. If adopted, the bill is expected to dramatically reduce tobacco
marketing, to ban many flavored cigarettes, and to prohibit the labeling of cigarettes as "light"
or "low-tar."

FDA-Approved Cancer Sticks. A consumer
protection bill that reduced competition, raised prices, restricted choice, blocked information, and made
products more hazardous could not really be counted as a success. Yet the Family Smoking Prevention and
Tobacco Control Act, which has broad support in both houses of Congress, promises to do all these things in an
effort to discourage consumption.

Cigarette
Tax Burnout. Politicians in Annapolis are scratching their heads wondering what happened to all
those chain smokers who were supposed to help balance Maryland's budget. Last year the legislature
doubled the cigarette tax to $2 a pack to pay for expanded health-care coverage. Eight months later,
cigarette sales have plunged 25% and the state is in fiscal distress again.

Judge Strikes Louisville Smoking
Ban. When Democrats took control of Congress last January after more than a decade of Republican
dominance, their leaders and supporters talked as if anything was possible: They'd end the Iraq war,
boost spending for neglected domestic programs, even roll back some of President Bush's tax cuts. Nearly
a year later, they've confronted a bitter reality.

It's Official — Belmont Bans Smoking In
Some Homes. Thought to be the first of its kind in California, the ordinance declares secondhand
smoke a public nuisance and extends the city's current smoking ban to include multi-unit, multi-story residences.
Though Belmont and some other California cities already restrict smoking in multi-unit common areas, Belmont is
the first city to extend secondhand smoke regulation to the inside of individual apartment units.

Phony Science Begets Phony Public Policy.
Many Americans find tobacco smoke to be a nuisance. … But how successful would anti-smokers have been in
a court of law, or public opinion, in achieving the kind of success they've achieved based on tobacco smoke
being a nuisance? A serious public health threat had to be manufactured, and in 1993 the Environmental
Protection Agency stepped in to the rescue with their bogus environmental tobacco smoke study that says
secondhand tobacco smoke is a class A carcinogen.

Nanny State,
USA. City governments go from banning smoking in city buildings one day to banning smoking
on the sidewalks the next. Several states are working on bans that prohibit driving while smoking if
anyone under 18 is in the car. There's no question that secondhand smoke is harmful, but where
is the appropriate limit for governmental intrusion into an individual's privacy?

Cannabis bigger cancer risk than
cigarettes: study. Smoking a joint is equivalent to 20 cigarettes in terms of lung cancer
risk, scientists in New Zealand have found, as they warned of an "epidemic" of lung cancers linked to cannabis.
Studies in the past have demonstrated that cannabis can cause cancer, but few have established a strong link
between cannabis use and the actual incidence of lung cancer.

Manure drastically
reduces development of lung cancer. Working with manure can drastically reduce chances of
developing lung cancer, scientists have discovered. Dairy farmers are five times less likely than the
general populace to develop the disease, New Scientist magazine reports. The study found farmers
typically breathed in dust that consisted largely of dried manure, and all the bacteria that grew in it.
New Scientist said adults who had a greater exposure to germs than usual might build up a better
resistance to bugs, including cancer.I've got a great idea...
Why not just put manure in cigarette filters instead of activated charcoal?

Tobacco tax is overtaxation. The
Legislature's proposal to increase the state's cigarette tax by another 50 cents per carton will give the
State of Michigan the dubious honor of having the third highest cigarette tax in the country. What is
even more troubling is that the proposal would increase the tax on cigars, pipe tobacco and chewing tobacco
by 100 percent.

Forgetting the Consequences of Totalitarianism.
Last year Surgeon General Richard Carmona declared there is "no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke."
For effect he added, "I would not allow anyone in my family to stand in a room with someone smoking." His
opinion was supposedly based on 20 years of scientific evidence, and it has been cited as gospel by
smoking ban supporters.

Killing the
passive smoking debate. "Secondhand smoke debate 'over.'" That's the message from the
Surgeon General's office, delivered by a sycophantic media. The claim is that the science has now
overwhelmingly proved that smoke from others' cigarettes can kill you. Actually, "debate over" simply
means: "If you have your doubts, shut up!" But you definitely should have doubts over the new
Surgeon General's report, a massive 727-page door stop.

See
a Smoker in a Non-Smoking Area? Call 911. If you catch someone smoking in a non-smoking
area in Omaha, Neb., call the police. The Omaha Police Department is encouraging city residents to
call 911 in the wake of the citywide ban on smoking that went into effect on Oct. 2.

[Is that what the designers of the 9-1-1 system had in mind?]

Anti-smoking Efforts Go Too
Far. How far has the anti-smoking movement come in just the past four years? Much further
than many of its most ardent activists would have dreamed of in the 1970s, when the notion of smoking bans
first surfaced and was met largely with derision. … Of course, as with most limitations on personal
freedom, California leads the way.

The
Subjection of Smoking: Smoking, once a common habit in American society, has become a lightning
rod for controversy in recent years. Smoking sections in restaurants were rare 50 years ago, but
now places like New York City have implemented blanket bans for indoor public places. Some places have
even extended bans to outdoor space.

Florida Companies Forbidding Smoking In Private
Lives. A growing number of companies in Florida are forbidding their workers from smoking not
only at work, but also in their private lives. Westgate Resorts, the largest private employer in Central
Florida, has banned smoking and won't budge from a policy of not hiring smokers and firing employees who do
smoke.

Smoking ban concerns businesses
in D.C.. Smokers are being forced out of bars and nightclubs in the District of Columbia beginning
Tuesday [1/2/2007], and some businesses are worried about losing dollars to Virginia, which has strong ties to
tobacco. "A lot of people are just going to drive closer to home (in Virginia)," said Jody Taylor,
manager of the Black Rooster Pub in downtown Washington. "For a lot of people, it's hard to have that
cold beer in one hand without a cigarette in the other."

The Last Gasp
of a Smoke-Filled Room? When the District goes smoke-free Jan. 2, at least one nicotine
haven will remain: the U.S. Capitol. Lawmakers, several of whom enjoy a good cigar, have exempted
themselves from the city's smoking ban, not to mention rules that forbid lighting up in federal buildings
across the country. But winds of change may be blowing on the Hill.

The Lynching of Big
Tobacco. The Florida Supreme Court is about to render final judgment in the Engle case,
which ordered tobacco companies to pay $165 billion in immediate, punitive damages in the name of their
alleged crimes against 700,000 Florida smokers.

Coalition Appeals
Colorado Smoking Ban. A coalition of businesses and an El Paso County tavern owner today
[11/22/2006] filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in their challenge to the
constitutionality of Colorado's "Clean Indoor Air Act." In October, a Colorado federal district court
upheld the law's constitutionality.

Ban
smokers from some surgery, says doctor. It is known to cause more heart complications, impair
tissue healing and result in more post-operative infections. Now a doctor is pushing for smoking to be
a criterion that eliminates people from access to some elective surgery.

Some hospitals won't
let smokers light up anywhere on grounds. Nationwide, hospitals are snuffing out tobacco on their
campuses, spurred in part by state and local laws restricting the habit. Half of King County's major
hospitals have joined the movement. Swedish Medical Center, the state's largest health-care provider,
went smoke-free two weeks ago. Valley Medical Center in Renton did so in March. Virginia Mason
Medical Center in Seattle was one of the first to ban smoking entirely, acting in 1994.

Propaganda from the Surgeon
General. According to U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona, … only smoke-free
buildings and public places "truly" protect us from the hazard of breathing in other people's tobacco
smoke. Separating smokers from nonsmokers and requiring air filtration systems are not
enough. Is this twenty-first century compassion or just another case of junk science
run amok?

Is
this the end of English literature? What do the following have in common: Oscar Wilde,
Henry James, Joseph Conrad, Virginia Woolf, T S Eliot, W B Yeats, Charles Dickens,
William Makepeace Thackeray, Evelyn Waugh, Philip Larkin and Kingsley Amis? The answer is, of course,
that if they were to come back to life in Gordon Brown's Britain and wanted to go out to their club, or a
restaurant or cafe, they would not be allowed to indulge in a habit which sustained them during the most
creative phases of their lives.

Cigarette Nazi update: Since
Carnival Cruise Lines banned smoking on its "Paradise" ship, 14 passengers and one employee have been put off at
the nearest port. One of the passengers was put off the ship after the steward simply found a pack of
cigarettes. According to Carnival, she was guilty of possession.

Laws prohibit smoking around
children. Anti-tobacco forces are opening a new front in the war against smoking by banning it
in private places such as homes and cars when children are present. Starting Jan. 1, Texas will
restrict smoking in foster parents' homes at all times and in cars when children are present, says Darrell
Azar of the Department of Family and Protective Services. Vermont, Washington and other states and
counties already prohibit foster parents from smoking around children in their homes and cars.

[Awwww … "It's for the children" after all. Who could be against that? Once again,
sentimental rhetoric prevails against individual liberty and personal responsibility.]

Belgium can now picture the worst from
smoking. Heavily taxed by governments, barred from smoking in offices, bars, restaurants and other
public spaces, and now forced to carry around small anti-smoking billboards, European smokers are not happy.

Charge smokers
for right to buy cigarettes. Smokers should be forced to apply for an annual £200 licence
in order to purchase cigarettes, a Government advisor has suggested. The scheme would ensure smokers had
to make a conscious decision to continue the habit and require people to become "registered addicts".

Tobacco
and firearms: Preserving liberty in NH. Two issues sure to come up in the next legislative
session are cigarette smoking and self-defense. Really, they are two aspects of one larger issue:
personal freedom. The petty tyrants who love to dictate the personal behavior of others nearly succeeded
in banning smoking in all restaurants and bars in New Hampshire this past legislative session. Make no
mistake, this is not a health issue. It's about control of private property.

A Secondhand Scare Campaign:
Secondhand smoke is a dramatically diluted substance compared to what active smokers breathe in. Spending
an hour in a typical bar back in the 1970s was the equivalent of smoking only .004 cigarettes. The
level of smoke contaminants in today's bars is much lower, and several orders of magnitude less than OSHA
indoor air quality standards.

Can
we just cut to the chase about the great Baltimore smoking-ban debate of 2006? City Hall
chambers were packed last week — packed, mind you — with hundreds of folks dying to weigh in
on the topic of whether the City Council should ban smoking in restaurants and bars. Many
opposed the ban, claiming that some owners of bars and restaurants might suffer a loss of business.
Proponents of the bill pointed out the hazards of secondhand smoke. But this issue isn't
about secondhand smoke. It's about firsthand stink.

Why I smoke
(cigars). There are few personal confessions more likely to alienate many Americans than to admit
to smoking. Singles ads are filled with people who will never even go on a first date with someone who
smokes. I strongly suspect that more women would date a millionaire who earned his money disreputably
than a millionaire who smoked.

Anti-Tobacco Zealots: Tobacco
executives have been accused of lying to Congress about their knowledge of tobacco's addictive
nature. Scientists have been analyzing the addictive qualities of nicotine since the late
1800s. Hundreds of medical studies have shown nicotine to be addictive. For a congressman
to ask a tobacco company executive whether nicotine is addictive is just as intelligent as that
congressman asking an astrophysicist whether the Earth revolves around the sun. Tobacco
executives fear liability suits and, therefore, deny addiction.

Menu madness: In the
early stages of the anti-tobacco campaign, there were calls for "reasonable" measures such as nonsmoking
sections on airplanes and health warnings on cigarette packs. In the 1970s, no one would have ever
believed such measures would have evolved into today's level of attack on smokers, which includes
confiscatory cigarette taxes and bans on outdoor smoking.

A
nation of sheeple. They started out calling for reasonable actions like no-smoking
sections on airplanes. Then it progressed to no smoking on airplanes altogether, then private
establishments such as restaurants and businesses. Emboldened by the timidity of smokers, in
some jurisdictions there are ordinances banning smoking in outdoor places such as beaches and
parks. Then there are seatbelt and helmet laws that have sometimes been zealously enforced
through the use of night vision goggles. On top of this, Americans accept government edicts
on where your child may ride in your car.

Mandatory
helmets rejected by motorcyclists. They came by the hundreds Sunday afternoon [10/7/2007] to the
Statehouse, on Harleys and Hondas, wearing jeans and leather, young and old, male and female, with one message
for lawmakers: Don't mandate helmets for adults. "It's not the helmet we oppose," Jeff Coleman,
state coordinator pro tem for ABATE, a motorcycle advocacy group, told those seated on the Statehouse
steps, to sustained applause. "It's the freedom of choice we defend."

Intolerable. The
government is only too eager to attempt to regulate people's private personal decisions. A few
years ago, Montgomery County, Md. considered a law that would have made it illegal to smoke in your
own home if neighbors complained. And several states, including New York and California, have
outlawed smoking in bars and restaurants.

Hill
Eyes National Cig Curb. Hillary Clinton lavished praise on New York City's tough
anti-smoking laws yesterday — and said she supports smoking bans in public places across the
country. Asked at an Iowa forum on cancer whether banning smoking in public places would
be good for America, Clinton replied, "Well, personally, I think so. And that's what a
lot of local communities and states are starting to do."In Sweden...Woman banned from smoking in her own garden. The
Environmental Court in Växjö has banned a woman from smoking in her own garden, Sydsvenkan reports.
The 49-year-old single mother is enraged by the decision but says that she will obey the ruling to avoid having
to pay a fine.

Officials
in California Town Say Smoking Ban Is Working. Ten weeks after they enacted the most draconian
smoking ban in the nation, city officials in Calabasas, Calif., say the rules are having the desired
impact — reducing exposure to the secondhand smoke that can accumulate when smokers congregate
outdoors and near building entrances.

Statement on the NIH 'Consensus' Report on
Tobacco Harm Reduction: "The National Institutes of Health conference statement on tobacco use is
only eight pages long, followed by another nine pages listing the M.D.s, M.P.H.s, R.N.s, etc. who participated
in the process. The report is typical government work, a statement of politically determined objectives
followed by a superficial review of programs and research, ending with a call for 'more research,' 'more
effective strategies,' 'more collaboration,' etc. … In short, this report is a virtually complete
whitewash of the evidence and even the debate taking place on the use of smokeless tobacco products as smoking
cessation aids. All the distinguished scientists and doctors whose names appear on the document ought to
be ashamed of themselves."

Thanks,
but no thanks. The latest assault on common sense comes from no less than
New York Assemblyman Alexander Grannis. The Manhattan Democrat is a perfectly nice guy, with
what seems a perfectly nice idea: ban smoking in cars in which there are children.Editor's note:
I do not recommend the use of tobacco; however, the following article provides an interesting overview
of the history of tobacco use. Evidently the recreational use of tobacco wasn't known to cause
lung cancer and other diseases until matchbooks and lighters became available and people started
smoking constantly.

WHO Document Relies on Half-Truths and
Omissions. In recognition of World No Tobacco Day, May 31, 2006, the World Health
Organization (WHO) published a lengthy document titled "Tobacco: Deadly in Any Form or Disguise."
The publication misleads at least as much as it informs, and distorting the health risks of various modes of
tobacco usage may cause more harm than it prevents.

Smoke-free crusaders may now be
at your door. Fresh from their success winning a statewide smoking ban in bars
and restaurants, Minnesota's anti-smoking advocates are ready to zero in on where you live.
One anti-smoking group will kick-start a campaign this week to encourage landlords to outlaw
smoking in their buildings.

House Votes to Have FDA Regulate
Tobacco. The bill doesn't give the FDA power to ban existing tobacco products but gives
the agency power to restrict sales on safety grounds. The FDA also would be able to stop companies
from touting their brands as "low tar" and "mild" and restrict advertising to plain black-and-white ads.

A
Bogus 'Anti-Cigarette' Bill. A law ordering the Food and Drug Administration to regulate cigarettes is
moving through Congress — but is it truly good for public health? Hint: Cigarette maker
Altria (formerly Philip Morris) is one of the bill's strongest supporters. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) has
already gotten the measure passed in the House; Sen. Ted Kennedy is on track to get it through the Senate soon.

Not Even Tobacco Is
Safe. The government's efforts to control and minimize tobacco could pick up more steam and begin to
resemble elements of outright prohibition.

Et Tu, Big
Business? This week, Philip Morris, the biggest of the Big Tobacco companies, supported
and won passage of an "anti-tobacco" bill that will make it easier for Philip Morris (a subsidiary of
Altria) to sell cigarettes by making it harder for smaller, more innovative firms to compete. One
way it will do that is by curtailing the First Amendment rights of tobacco companies, making it harder
to advertise their products (including healthier alternatives to normal cigarettes). Philip Morris,
maker of Marlboro and other established brands, already controls 50 percent of the market. That's
why it lobbied government to keep it that way.

Sweet Lies
About Kids and Smoking. At least since 1994, when seven tobacco executives testified before Congress
that they didn't think cigarettes were addictive, the public has not put great trust in those who sell carcinogens
for a living. What Americans may not realize is that they also shouldn't believe the people who are supposed
to protect us from tobacco. When it comes to cigarettes, the federal government can blow smoke with the
best of them.

Tobacco
Truth Gets Smoked. Any smoker who gives up cigarettes for snuff is clearly doing his or
her body a favor. That's because most of the danger from tobacco actually comes from setting it
afire and inhaling the smoke. Omitting that step makes a huge difference.The Editor says...
Let me reiterate that The Editor is not now, nor has he ever been, a cigarette smoker. The
Editor finds "smokeless tobacco to be every bit as disgusting and low-class as ordinary cigarettes,
and does not recommend either one. Nevertheless, both are legal products, and if there are
self-destructive consumers waiting in line to buy these addictive products, the fools should be
allowed to purchase them.

Winston
Churchill's cigar airbrushed from picture. In the well-known original image, Churchill makes a
"V" shaped symbol with his fingers — while gripping a cigar in the corner of his mouth. But
in a reproduction of the picture, hanging over the main entrance to a London museum celebrating the wartime
leader, he has been made into a non-smoker through the use of image-altering techniques.The Editor says...
Of course, there was no literal airbrush used in this process. It's an anachronism, like
sending someone a carbon copy of an email message.

NYC
to try banning smoking in parks and beaches. New York City is pursuing a tough new policy that
would shoo smokers out of public parks, beaches and even the heart of Times Square -- one of the most
ambitious outdoor anti-tobacco efforts in the nation.

Another page has information about the use
of taxes to discourage smoking,
or at least to take advantage of the people who are addicted to tobacco.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be
the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under
omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep,
his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our
own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of
their own conscience."