In the overwhelming majority of cases, the conception of a child is an unconscious and a bestial act that takes place when the sexual mates are at their worst in terms of the degree of their manifested consciousnesses in their minds, vitals and bodies and as such such a type of conception is usually a purge, a catharsis, of the most uncomely traits that get passed on to the offspring in activated form and this dysfunctional form of breeding together with eugenic abnormalities like hypogamy and/or inbreeding results in the birth of progeny that're distorted in mind, vital and physical instincts.

There's no mystery to the phenomenon of the metempsychosis or to reincarnation that's based on causation as applied to the laws governing consciousness and an indication of the application of the law of cycles which is common in natural processes and this continues until a state of stato-dynamic equilibrium is attained by the individualized consciousness which then suspends the cyclical process and confers on the consciousness a state of stability and freedom and identification with the universals rather than with the particulars.

(NaturalNews) If you talk to the global warming crowd, carbondioxide -- CO2 -- is the enemy of mankind. Any and allcreation of CO2 is bad for the planet, we're told, and itsproduction must be strictly limited in order to save the world.But what if that wasn't true? What if CO2 were actually aplanet-saving nutrient that could multiply food productionrates and feed the world more nutritious, healthy plants?CO2 is a vital nutrient for food cropsAs it turns out, CO2 is desperately needed by food crops, andright now there is a severe shortage of CO2 on the planetcompared to what would be optimum for plants. Greenhouseoperators are actually buying carbon dioxide and injecting itinto their greenhouses in order to maximize plant growth.The science on this is irrefutable. As just one example, theOntario Ministry of Agriculture and Food says:CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth andvigour. Some ways in which productivity is increased by CO2include earlier flowering, higher fruit yields, reduced budabortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower size.Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient .If you want to understand why CO2 is an essential nutrient forfood crop growth, check out this informative slide show . Itexplains that "CO2 may be repidly depleted during cropproduction" daylight hours, because the plants pull all the CO2out of the air and use it in photosynthesis.The CO2 found in modern-day atmosphere is 340ppm. Butfood crops would grow far faster if the concentration of CO2were closer to 1000ppm, or roughly 300% higher than currentlevels. In fact, most greenhouse plant production causes a"CO2 depletion" to happen, shutting down photosynthesis andlimiting food production. As the "Carbon Dioxide inGreenhouses" fact sheet explains:Ambient CO2 level in outside air is about 340 ppm by volume.All plants grow well at this level but as CO2 levels are raised by1,000 ppm photosynthesis increases proportionately resultingin more sugars and carbohydrates available for plant growth.Any actively growing crop in a tightly clad greenhouse withlittle or no ventilation can readily reduce the CO2 level duringthe day to as low as 200 ppm.Thus, greenhouse plants are "running out" of CO2. They arestarving for it. And when you add it to food crops, you gethigher yields, improved taste, shorter flowering times,enhanced pest resistance and other benefits.Why we should pump carbon dioxideinto greenhousesThis brings up an obvious answer for what to do with all theCO2 produced by power plants, office buildings and evenfitness centers where people exhale vast quantities of CO2. Theanswer is to build adjacent greenhouses and pump the CO2into the greenhouses.

The madness that was Iraq War, listen from the Horse' Mouth Now Part-1

Update: The Iraq War Ledger

A Look at the War’s Human, Financial, and Strategic Costs

Matthew Duss and Peter Juul December 2011

01. The United States is withdrawing the last of its troops from Iraq this month, which makes now an appropriate time to begin weighing the costs and benefits to U.S. national security from our intervention there.

02. On May 1, 2003, President George W. Bush stood aboard the deck of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and declared to the country and to the world that “Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.”

03. As Americans would quickly find out, President Bush’s declaration of victory was severely premature. Iraq would soon be in the throes of a violent insurgency and, eventually, a full- blown sectarian civil war.

04. More than eight years after that speech, as President Barack Obama prepares to keep his promise to end the war, Iraq has made progress but still struggles with insecurity and deep political discord.

05. Though the level of violence has remained down from its 2006– 2007peak—when dozens of bodies could be found on Baghdad’s streets every morning—Iraq still endures a level of violence that in any other country would be considered a crisis.

06. Still, the end of former Iraq President Saddam Hussein’s brutal regime represents a considerable global good, and a nascent democratic Iraqi republic partnered with the United States could potentially yield benefits in the future.

07. But when weighing those possible benefits against the costs of the Iraq intervention, there is simply no conceivable calculus by which Operation Iraqi Freedom can be judged to have been a successful or worthwhile policy.

08. The war was intended to show the extent of America's Power, it succeeded only in showing its limits

09. The tables and charts below tell the tale. We have grouped these costs into three categories:

The human costs, dealing with American and Iraqi casualties

The financial costs, dealing with the expense of the war and of the continued care for The strategic costs, dealing with the impact of the Iraq intervention on U.S. power and influence in the Middle East and on the global stage

Sure, CO2 stimulates some crops (and poison ivy). But at the expense of climate change. That CO2 has to go somewhere after incorporation.It doesnt stay in the plant forever - rather it is released back into the atmosphere during decomposition.(Unless the plant in question is peat moss in a cold climate.)

<quoted text>LOLOLOLthat is not anything newRead an intro textbook on Environmental ScienceChapter - carbon cycleSure, CO2 stimulates some crops (and poison ivy). But at the expense of climate change. That CO2 has to go somewhere after incorporation.It doesnt stay in the plant forever - rather it is released back into the atmosphere during decomposition.(Unless the plant in question is peat moss in a cold climate.)And by they way, whether a plant is stimulated is not as simple as you think - it depends upon its metabolism. Plants are either C3 or C4 - the label refers to a dominant carrier molecule during phtosythesis. C4 plants are more susceptible to CO2, while C3 plants are less sensitive.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C3_carbon_fixati...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C4_carbon_fixati...http://www.cgrer.uiowa.edu/people/carmichael/...If you are interested in this topic - I recommend learning some basic science first.

rabbee: you forgot the effects of CO, for healthy root systems. and i would be more alarmed at an substantial increase, in CO than CO2 for the moment...

but i have a different take, on global warming. G-D'S Anger is being kindled at the whole world, at odds against HIM. and pissing of G-D, seem to have gotten some dramatic results here in TheTorah. and most certainly won't get any of us, admitted into GanEden.

ONE G-D for all, and all for TheOne G-D, here in TheTorah Happening again. is TheOnly Way, to GanEden.

and obviously this world, did not make it there. with every one at fault, blaming each other for being the fault.

but i have a different take, on global warming. G-D'S Anger is being kindled at the whole world, at odds against HIM. and pissing of G-D, seem to have gotten some dramatic results here in TheTorah. and most certainly won't get any of us, admitted into GanEden.

<quoted text>CO2 is only one half of the greenhouse emissions to be concerned about that cause global warming.Methane (CH4) and the oxides of Nitrogen (NO, NO2, N20) are the other half as well.The basic problem is the liberation of carbon from the long term pool. I.E. the burning of fossil fuels.Storing carbon is a short term pool - plantlife - doesnt solve the problem obviously because of the relatively rapid turnoverIronically, we have discussed the carbon cycle on this very forum before - including the C3, C4 stuff and the ability of plant to grow more - so Volunteerist CANT claim this is a NEW idea.

yada yada yada the earth was warmer in the past than it is now, this is just another means of control by the liberal freaks.

<quoted text>standard fundamentalist argumentHughbe blames it all on satanequal amount of data for either of those explanations

rabbee: well call me what you want about it, frijoles crazy insane or fundamentalist. but i have spoken, to G-D about it. so i have HaShem G-D'S Input about it all.

and how can you blame anything on hasatan, when G-D gave hasatan all his instructions? who is in charge of his enemies, as well as baal hamolech, and halooseefer. who all also receive their instructions from HaShem.

but if you look long enough, if you measure a sufficient number of attributes, and if you are highly selective, you can eventually find statistical evidence to prove or disprove any claim.

so do not ask of me, to represent any of you liars against G-D. here in TheTorah Accounting, all happening again.

rabbee: well pissing off G-D, certainly is of no help to this world. and it ain't going to get, any of us into GanEden either. as G-D has a greater influence on this world here in TheTorah than you could ever imagine.

The madness that was Iraq War, listen from the Horse' Mouth Now Part-2

Update: The Iraq War Ledger

A Look at the War’s Human, Financial, and Strategic Costs

Matthew Duss and Peter Juul December 2011

10. Before turning to those tables and charts, however, we would like to make two additional points

.11. First, it is critical to remember the shifting justifications for the U.S. intervention in Iraq.

12. The Iraq invasion was sold to the American public on the basis of Saddam Hussein’s supposed possession of weapons of mass destruction and his alleged relationship with Al Qaeda.

13. When both claims turned out to be false, the Bush administration justified the intervention on the idea that a democratic Iraq would be an ally in the “war on terror” and an inspiration for democratic reform in the Middle East. These arguments remain, at best, highly questionable.

14. Second, the authors would like to make clear that this analysis of the costs of the Iraq war in no way diminishes the sacrifice, courage, and honor displayed by the U.S. military in Iraq.

15. Americans troops have served and died in Iraq at the behest of the American people and two of their commanders-in-chief. This is why it is important to draw the correct lessons from our nation’s invasion of Iraq. In order to do that, its costs must be examined honestly and rigorously.

CO2 & Temperature (also see Temperature Record)The ice-core data is frequently cited as principal evidence toargue that CO2 is the earth’s main climate driver. It is, in away, the jewel in the crown of the theory of man made globalwarming. But the ice-core data does not show that CO2 drivesclimate. It shows, very clearly, that variations in temperatureprecede rises in atmospheric CO2 – not the other way round.The two phenomena are divided by a time lag of severalhundred years.There is no evidence that CO2 has ever ‘driven’ the climate inthe past, nor is there any compelling evidence that it is doingso now.According to global warming theory, if an enhancedgreenhouse effect (from increased levels of CO2 or indeed anyother greenhouse gas) is responsible for warming the earth,then the rate of temperature rise should be greatest in that partof the earth’s atmosphere known as the troposphere,specifically in the tropics. And yet the observations, fromweather balloons and satellites have consistently shown thatnot to be the case. I urge readers to look at the Christy et alpapers below. The latest one was recently published in theJournal of Geophysical Research (2007). This may seem like arather technical issue, but it strikes at the very heart of thetheory of man made global warming.The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate ChangeRead MoreTropospheric temperature change since 1979 from tropicalradiosonde and satellite measurements”– John R. Chirsty,William B.Norris, Roy W. Spencer, Justin J. Hnilo Journal ofGeophysical Research, VOL. 112, D06102Read Morehttp://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/co...

<quoted text>CO2 & Temperature (also see Temperature Record)The ice-core data is frequently cited as principal evidence toargue that CO2 is the earth’s main climate driver. It is, in away, the jewel in the crown of the theory of man made globalwarming. But the ice-core data does not show that CO2 drivesclimate. It shows, very clearly, that variations in temperatureprecede rises in atmospheric CO2 – not the other way round.The two phenomena are divided by a time lag of severalhundred years.There is no evidence that CO2 has ever ‘driven’ the climate inthe past, nor is there any compelling evidence that it is doingso now.According to global warming theory, if an enhancedgreenhouse effect (from increased levels of CO2 or indeed anyother greenhouse gas) is responsible for warming the earth,then the rate of temperature rise should be greatest in that partof the earth’s atmosphere known as the troposphere,specifically in the tropics. And yet the observations, fromweather balloons and satellites have consistently shown thatnot to be the case. I urge readers to look at the Christy et alpapers below. The latest one was recently published in theJournal of Geophysical Research (2007). This may seem like arather technical issue, but it strikes at the very heart of thetheory of man made global warming.The Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate ChangeRead MoreTropospheric temperature change since 1979 from tropicalradiosonde and satellite measurements”– John R. Chirsty,William B.Norris, Roy W. Spencer, Justin J. Hnilo Journal ofGeophysical Research, VOL. 112, D06102Read Morehttp://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/co...

In other words you didnt read my post

I will be happy to respond if you read my post and address it accordingly

http://www.scribd.com/doc/7560 6978The madness that was Iraq War, listen from the Horse' Mouth Now Part-2Update: The Iraq War LedgerA Look at the War’s Human, Financial, and Strategic CostsMatthew Duss and Peter Juul December 201110. Before turning to those tables and charts, however, we would like to make two additional points.11. First, it is critical to remember the shifting justifications for the U.S. intervention in Iraq.12. The Iraq invasion was sold to the American public on the basis of Saddam Hussein’s supposed possession of weapons of mass destruction and his alleged relationship with Al Qaeda.13. When both claims turned out to be false, the Bush administration justified the intervention on the idea that a democratic Iraq would be an ally in the “war on terror” and an inspiration for democratic reform in the Middle East. These arguments remain, at best, highly questionable.14. Second, the authors would like to make clear that this analysis of the costs of the Iraq war in no way diminishes the sacrifice, courage, and honor displayed by the U.S. military in Iraq.15. Americans troops have served and died in Iraq at the behest of the American people and two of their commanders-in-chief. This is why it is important to draw the correct lessons from our nation’s invasion of Iraq. In order to do that, its costs must be examined honestly and rigorously.(Contd.)

What is your objective with this series?

The majority of Americans already know that the Iraqi war was a fiasco. And the minority that do not believe this will never be convinced.

The author of The Yoga Vashishta asserts that the world is relative to the mind and must therefore be mental in basal character if the possibility of its being known is to be achieved:

"The subject cannot be aware of the object unless they are related. And there cannot exist any relation between two heterogeneous things. Relation implies identity, for it cannot be possible between two utterly different objects. The cognition of the object by the subject therefore establishes their substantial identity. If they were utterly different from each other, knowledge would not have been possible; the subject would ever remain unaware of the object as a stone of the taste of sugar. The whole world is merely ideal. It does not exist except in thought. It arises and exists in the mind. The whole universe is the self-expansion of the Mind Force. It is a huge dream arisen within the mind. It is Mind alone that has assumed the forms of time, space and movement."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.