Are you interested in learning more
about the different types of violence that afflict our world, and what you can
do to help seek peaceful solutions? Register for Compassion, Peace and Justice
Training Day (CPJ Day) on March 21 and Ecumenical Advocacy Days from March 21 –
24 in Washington, DC.

Workshops for CPJ Day will cover a
variety of topics. And, all will show Presbyterians are involved in finding
solutions to transform violence. Workshops include: “Is Poverty a Form of
Violence?”, “Ending Violence Against Women”, “The Presbyterian Response to the
Conflict in Syria”, “When the Global Market Gets Violent” and “Nonviolent
Responses to the Occupation” among many others. Featured speakers for these
events include:

·
James “Jim” Atwood, a retired Presbyterian minister who has spent nearly 40
years working on issues of gun violence prevention;

·
Herman Kumara, an
internationally recognized organizer in the fisheries sector and a prominent
voice for human rights in Sri Lanka;

·
Rev. J. Herbert Nelson, II,
the director the Office of Public Witness (OPW) for the Presbyterian Church
(U.S.A.) in Washington, DC;

·
Shaya Gregory Poku, an advocate for reconciliation and staff member of the Center for
Spirituality, Dialogue and Service at Northeastern University, where she
directs the Social Justice Resource Center to train the next generation in
critical thinking, interfaith cooperation, global awareness and self-knowledge

·
Linda Eastwood, a
Presbyterian teaching elder who has recently spent several years coordinating
the Colombia Accompaniment Program, a partnership between the Presbyterian
Peace Fellowship, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and the Presbyterian Church
of Colombia (IPC, Iglesia Presbiteriana de Colombia.)

On
February 7, President Obama signed into law the newest Farm Bill.
Unfortunately, the best I can say about the
overall bill is that it could have been worse.The PC(USA) has a long history of supporting a Farm Bill that
connects hungry people to what should be a sustainable food system. Last year,
both the PC(USA) Big Tent and Ecumenical Advocacy Days focused on Food Justice.
But this bill falls short of the justice we seek.

The Bad News:the bill
cuts $8 billion from SNAP, formerly the Food Stamp Program. In this economic
climate, it is unconscionable that we are cutting nutrition assistance to some
of the most vulnerable people in the country. Due to these cuts, some 850,000
households will lose an average of $90 per month. These
cuts are unacceptable.
Further, the Farm Bill fails to make reforms to Farm programs that benefit
corporate Ag, like commodity and crop insurance subsidies.

The Good News:the bill
invests over $1.2 billion in the innovative programs for beginning farmers,
local food, organic agriculture, rural development, and specialty crops that
were stranded when the Farm Bill expired in 2012. The bill also reconnects crop insurance subsidies
to basic conservation requirements. Furthermore, under this new law, U.S.
international humanitarian food aid becomes much more efficient and culturally
appropriate. These were all key requests of the faith community.

A Reason to be Relieved:I am not writing today about a $40 billion cut to SNAP and the
four million people who would be about to lose their benefits, as I would if
the House-passed Farm Bill had become law. Indeed, when thousands of
Presbyterians responded to frantic action alerts about that $40 billion cut in
September 2013, I could not have imagined that the final, comparable damage
would be so small.

So, the new Farm Bill is a mixed bag. The SNAP cuts are appalling,
but they are not nearly as bad as they could be – or even than we thought they
would be only a few months ago. The farm programs are investing in some new and
innovative ideas in agriculture, even while they fall short of real reform of
the system. In all, this is not a good bill, nor is it something the PC(USA)
can support, but it does do some good things.

While most of the recent coverage of the Affordable Care Act
(ACA), more commonly referred to as “Obamacare,” has been negative, these news
stories fail to tell a complete story. There is no doubt the Obama
Administration has made some serious errors in the rollout and initial implementation
of Obamacare. Nevertheless, the ACA has already made a huge difference in the
lives of people who now have access to health coverage due to important changes
in the health care law. And now, in the final months of the first open
enrollment session of the new exchanges, even more people will see better – and
hopefully less expensive – access to coverage.

Why does the Church
care about Obamacare?

For more than 60 years, Presbyterian General Assemblies have
been calling for reform of the U.S. health system, urging the establishment of
a national medical plan that will ensure universal health coverage for all persons
residing in the United States. In 1988, the Assembly wrote, “Jesus’ command to love our neighbor
requires persons with plentiful health resources both to comprehend the
condition of those persons without basic health care and to share the means to
health.” In other words, it is our collective responsibility as a community, and
as a nation, to make sure that all people have access to the means to good
health – that is, access to quality, affordable, comprehensive health
coverage.

As yesterday’s article pointed out, the PC(USA) has supported the implementation of
a national medical plan, or a single-payer system (i.e. Medicare for all) for
many years, and the ACA still falls short of this ideal. However, as the Office of Public Witness engaged
in the health care reform debate in 2009-10, we saw some significant opportunities.
To be sure, we encountered some disappointments and missed opportunities, but we
also witnessed some important steps toward increasing access to health
coverage, especially for low-income families and adults without children. We
saw sensible, preventative services and wellness care become available for millions
of people who previously could only access health services through the
Emergency Room.

We also saw many more opportunities to make reforms that move
us in the right direction. Certainly, the PC(USA)’s long-standing commitment to
health, wellness, and universality of coverage would have moved us away from
the intervention of private, for-profit insurance companies, had that been a
political possibility. However, decades of Presbyterian witness lead us to
believe that the ACA is making improvements. Furthermore, we urge its critics
give it a chance to work.

So, what does the ACA
do?

Well, right now, and most in the public eye, the new
“exchanges” have gone live, and Americans are purchasing health insurance, many
with the aid of need-based subsidies from the federal government. Despite a
botched initial rollout, many anecdotes suggest that people are now having positive
experiences using healthcare.gov or their own states’ systems. So far, 3.3
million people have used the exchange to obtain coverage, and the enrollment
period has not yet ended. Enroll
America has some great resources, as well as a subsidy calculator, and of
course, healthcare.gov is the place to
go to enroll.

But insurance has never really been the faith community’s
concern. As the PC(USA) and its partners have engaged the health care debate,
our primary and immediate concern has always been people – their health, their care, and the shalom that God intends
for all of us. Access to health insurance is a means to an end, and that “end”
is making sure that more people can live healthy, whole, safe lives, free from
the fear that the next illness will mean not only personal tragedy but also bankruptcy.

Ultimately, our concern has been people’s access to care. And
despite its shortcomings, the ACA’s reforms are making health care more accessible for more people.

Certain reforms went into effect even before the new exchange
launch that has been making headlines. In many ways, what seem like the small changes
have been some of the greatest accomplishments of this law. For example:

Young
adults may now stay on their parents’ health plan up to the age of 26,
regardless of being a student, residence, or martial status.

Insurers may no longer discriminate against children with pre-existing conditions,
and starting in 2014, adults have the same protections.

Women
can no longer be charged higher coverage rates due to their gender or health
status.

Insurance companies can no longer cancel coverage when someone becomes sick or because of
an unintentional mistake, nor can insurers limit
the amount of care for essential health benefits in a lifetime.

Some of the more substantial changes have also turned out to
be huge victories:

States have the option to expand Medicaid benefits to individuals and families who have
incomes less than 133% of the federal poverty level.

oThis is crucial, as many low-income people,
especially those without children, have no access to health coverage at all.

oTo date, six million people have gained access
to health coverage through Medicaid expansion.

oTwenty-three states have elected to expand Medicaid
coverage (with four additional states implementing alternative expansions).

oCampaigns are ongoing in many of the remaining
states to urge state legislatures to take action.

Older adults receive
a 52% discount on covered medications while in the Medicare Part D
prescription coverage “donut hole,” and the donut hole will close in 2020.

All standard insurance plans will now cover preventative health services like
check-ups, vaccinations, and cancer screenings without a copay or deductible.

This may be a long list of wonky policy changes, but they
all boil down to one thing – access to
more care for more people.

Where do we go from
here?

There is no question – this is not the final chapter in
health care reform. Many new reforms and policy changes are still required to improve
access and quality, to reduce costs, and most importantly, to make sure that
all people living in this nation have access to the care they need to live
healthy, whole lives. For those who were disappointed that the ACA was not a
single-payer system, or even that it did not include a public option, take
heart. We know from experience that the implementation of major new government
programs will inevitably lead to more discussion, tweaks, improvements, and
ongoing policy debates. The conversation will continue. After we’ve lived into
the new current system, we’ll have to figure out how to improve it… again.

Sabrina Slater, Intern for Public Witness, contributed to this article.Click here for the rest of this week's Unbound articles on Health Care.Author Bios:

Leslie Woods has served as Representative for Domestic Poverty and Environmental Issues for the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Office of Public Witness (OPW) since January 2007. In this capacity, she advocates on behalf of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) on matters related to economic inequality, poverty, hunger, health, human needs, federal budget, climate change, energy and other environmental issues. She also coordinates the Internship and Fellowship programs for Public Witness Programs, the OPW’s service learning opportunities for young adults. Leslie holds a Master of Arts in Religion with a concentration in Hebrew Bible, magna cum laude, from Yale Divinity School and a Bachelor of Arts in Religious Studies and French, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, from Randolph-Macon College. Leslie is the proud mother of two little boys – Daniel and Joshua.

Sabrina Slater currently serves as an intern for the
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Office of Public Witness. Currently pursuing
a Master of Divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary, Sabrina is
interning while spending a semester in DC with the National Capital Semester
for Seminarians program hosted at Wesley Theological Seminary. Her
advocacy focus includes domestic poverty, the relationship between poverty and
violence, human trafficking, women and relationship violence. Having
enjoyed a career in higher education prior to beginning the ordination process
Sabrina is committed to honest dialogue and hearing peoples' voices and
stories. Sabrina holds a Master's in Education with focus on general and
special education from Wagner College and a Bachelor of Arts in Cognitive
Science and Health & Human Development from Lehigh University.

About Me

The Presbyterian Office of Public Witness is the public policy information and advocacy office of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Its task is to advocate, and help the church to advocate, the social witness perspectives and policies of the Presbyterian General Assembly. The church has a long history of applying these biblically and theologically-based insights to issues that affect the public — maintaining a public policy ministry in the nation's capital since 1946.
Reformed theology teaches that because a sovereign God is at work in all the world, the church and Christian citizens should be concerned about public policy. In addition, Presbyterian forefather John Calvin wrote, "Civil magistry is a calling not only holy and legitimate, but by far the most sacred and honorable in human life."