His introductory paragraphs are crucial to understanding his thoughts on this subject:

----------------------

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.

The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right – it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.

It’s been said that the Second Amendment is America’s first freedom. That’s because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative.

As I've been saying, Donald Trump's defense of the Second Amendment is sufficient reason all by itself to vote for Trump. Do you think the right to defend oneself effectively might be helpful in a darkening America?

Trump is also the first out of the gate to make a big splash with discussing his plans under the 2nd Amendment, and I'm sure the NRA will get behind this plan in a big way. Everyone else in the field will look like they are sleeping, AGAIN.

Not sure why he released this on a Friday. But I guarantee this will be the news and the chatter for all next week. The Donald really knows how to capture the media attention, with good ideas I might add.

His introductory paragraphs are crucial to understanding his thoughts on this subject:

----------------------

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.

The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right – it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.

It’s been said that the Second Amendment is America’s first freedom. That’s because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative.

This is refreshingly good. But I disagree with Donald as to the purpose of the Second Amendment. It is not only for the right to self-defense, but it is for the citizenry to protect itself from a tyrannical government.

His introductory paragraphs are crucial to understanding his thoughts on this subject:

----------------------

The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon. Period.

The Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right that belongs to all law-abiding Americans. The Constitution doesn’t create that right – it ensures that the government can’t take it away. Our Founding Fathers knew, and our Supreme Court has upheld, that the Second Amendment’s purpose is to guarantee our right to defend ourselves and our families. This is about self-defense, plain and simple.

It’s been said that the Second Amendment is America’s first freedom. That’s because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms protects all our other rights. We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment. Protecting that freedom is imperative.

There actually is another country with a "Second Amendment." Indeed, it is the country which was the source of the idea for America's Founding Fathers: Switzerland.

And Switzerland has a real national militia -- of its citizenry. Every man (and perhaps woman) is issued a rifle by the government -- and they all train and serve not only in, but as, Switzerland's military.

Switzerland has never been invaded. And it's national militia is one of the two reasons why -- the other being Switzerland's mountainous terrain.

One thing is becoming clear about Donald Trump. When he does something, he doesn't just do it off the top of his head -- or someone stupid's head. He gets the best minds on the subject and comes up with an EXCELLENT plan.

The same was true with his IMMIGRATION PLAN.

This elicits confidence in his leadership -- and utterly nullifies complaints that he's too vague and general. On the contrary, he's the most specific and detailed candidate out there. But he thinks first, comes up with the general principle first. Then he gets the best minds on the subject -- and formulates a detailed plan, one that will work.

That's leadership. Intelligent responsible leadership.

Impressive.

If he says he can get the 30 million illegal aliens out in a year and half. By gum, I think he'll do it.

Yep, and shouldn't have to have state or national permit. Permits are regulatory BS in order to take in tax money and keep tabs on people. They SAY carry info is protected but if it's on a computer somewhere, or written down somewhere....well, say goodbye to privacy.

Agree but ,how in the world are we going to keep guns out of the hands or illegals and/or felons ?it is an imperfect method I know ,but short of declaring the US a Ethnocracy where only whites are allowed to have and carry guns,I don`t see any other avenue.but keeping it on the State level it is essential,one it passes to the Feds ,everything is lost

Agree but ,how in the world are we going to keep guns out of the hands or illegals and/or felons ?it is an imperfect method I know ,but short of declaring the US a Ethnocracy where only whites are allowed to have and carry guns,I don`t see any other avenue.but keeping it on the State level it is essential,one it passes to the Feds ,everything is lost

The federal - state question is a good one. The jews' approach to disarming White Americans has been to do it state by state. New York and California have been effectively disarmed. Now they're working on Oregon -- putting millions of dollars into the effort.

Taking it out of the state hands, at least insofar as enforcing the Constitution on the Second Amendment, would prevent the jews from disarming Americans using this state by state strategy.

There's a danger though, perhaps: centralizing the power of this question in the federal government.

The safeguard against this -- is that the Federal government would and is ONLY EMPOWERED to enforce the Constitution and Bill of Rights. If a state is refusing to abide by the Bill of Rights, the federal government can override the state on that issue.

The problem is that America is now multi-racial. Only White people should be armed. This is obvious. How to achieve that, I don't know -- other than Whites taking back control over their country.