Looking at the current state of Indian politics & society as a whole, anyone will be agree with the analogy of 'Animal Farm'.
Indian politicians with criminal backgrounds & fake educational qualifications rule the country. They have loyal bureaucrats at their disposal who are always ready to fulfill the wishes of politicians.
These pigs & bitches together rule the herd called common man who is the ultimate victim of such majoritarian democratic system.

The definition for bureaucrat stands foul as the discussion is in the context of India.
It is said in the context of analogy with the book 'Animal Farm'.http://dictionary.reference.com...
an official who works by fixed routine without exercising intelligent judgment. Dog is animal which follows orders of its master without opposing it. In political context, its the politician who orders bureaucrats.
Pig is commonly considered as filthy animal and fits into politicians context.

As you can see the politician is human the pig is a pig and per definitions the bureaucrat is a dinosaur. As these thigns are all different species one CANNOT be the other. I have fufilled my BOP, my opponent hasn't. Vote CON

"16adams speech had potential of being hilarious, similair to "poop has DNA", but not enough rounds were given for his semantics to win me over. When you troll, you need to be dedicated to it like Imabench!"

Reasons for voting decision: 16k's semantic trap fails because the definitions were quite clear in the context of pros argument. Conduct to pro for actually taking this seriously and wanting to debate. Con made no actual arguments. Neither of the sources provided could be considered more reliable, so that's a tie.

Reasons for voting decision: I think Pro deserves this because he's a new debator, and didn't deserve a semantics Bull Ride. 16adams speech had potential of being hilarious, similair to "poop has DNA", but not enough rounds were given for his semantics to win me over. When you troll, you need to be dedicated to it like Imabench!

Reasons for voting decision: 16k squirrelled a definition out of context. vijaka gave the context of the term "pig" to be analogous of those within Animal Farm. He provided very little argument, but 16k provided nothing. It's not even a semantic trap, it's squirelling, which, by almost all debating rules, is an instant loss.

Reasons for voting decision: A new debater wants to debate a topic, and the first thing he faces is a semantic trap. A friendly warning in the comments would have been nice. Conduct against Con. Even though Pro did not present any compelling arguments, he gets the arguments because of no contest from Con.