According to ancient lore, every man is born into the world with two bags
suspended from his neck---one in front and one behind, and both are full
of faults. But the one in front is full of his neighbor's faults; the one
behind, full of his own. Consequently, men are blind to their own faults
but never lose sight of their neighbor's.

_________________"A hypocrite pats you on the back in front of your
face, and slaps you in the face behind your back."
-Unknown

Dear Marine Sniper:
The action in Serbia was a UN sanctioned coalition and no depleted uranium was used on the civilian populace.
The invasion of Iraq was a bloody shock and awe unsanctioned bombardment of innocent civilians using depleted uranium weapons based on lies about Saddam Hussein.
The action in Serbia was against a leadership that was sanctioned by the UN Gen'l Assy
The Invasion of Iraq was a personal vendetta against S. Hussein by G. Brish for the Bush Crime Family illegally using United States finances, materiel, and personnel to the detriment of all concerned.

Now why don't you go back to Iraq and put those people back together?

Not everyone in America is proud of your ability to "puree" innocent people. There would have been more honor to America if G. Brish had "duked" it out with Saddam as Mr. Hussein recommended. He will always be the winner in that war. America is the loser.

Remember, you can win battles, and still lose the war.

_________________"The moving finger writes, & having writ, moves on; And not all your pleas, can call it back to cancel half a line, nor all your tears wash out a word of it."

The "war" was sold as a slef defense operation (WMD), against a threat to us. However, from the onset the prpaganda was set by naming the "operation" "Iraqi Freedom". Well, why wasn't it named "Opeation Disarm Iraq?" Because it was never about disarming Iraq; it was about the PNAC plan for global domination.

The "war" was sold as a slef defense operation (WMD), against a threat to us. However, from the onset the prpaganda was set by naming the "operation" "Iraqi Freedom". Well, why wasn't it named "Opeation Disarm Iraq?" Because it was never about disarming Iraq; it was about the PNAC plan for global domination.

Welcome to the board j2ts2!

I agree Jesse .. Just wanted to add my thoughts ... So, here goes.

We think about Iraq and what it might become. I'll tell you want I think about it. It will be worse then it ever was, as far as being poor and etc.
The furture is far far from bright for the people of Iraq. Israel has and I think always will be a thorn in the side of any real kind of recovery for Iraq. They have been and I expect they still are against any kind of Worl / UN interference. The UN has many (dominated) third World Countries who most always votes against Israeli & American / Jewish interest. Ask yourself what Israel has to gain from a stable / prosperouse Iraq? lets face it, If it doesn't serve Israel forget it. They'll try and control or destroy what does not serve them. They come first overall in the Middle East and that is that. Maybe first in the World - over all? One might look at it as a total single mindedness and it is. What don't serve us ... kill it. When one thinks about money and power, who do you think has the most influence and control on / over other Countries? Not to mention the blackmail and etc. Take a good look at Canada and Britain, talk about nose rings! Check out banking histories and money. USA is a Pitbull for what Country?

Your thoughts .. anyone?

Peace & Freedom always!

Sir...

_________________You will know you have spoken the truth when you are angrily denounced; and you will know you have spoken both truly and well when you are visited by the thought police.