Given the amount I’ve written about Independent voters recently, I would be remiss not to comment on the happy outcome of Tuesday’s elections in New Jersey and Virginia, and the impact of the Independent vote.

As with any election, several factors were involved in this week’s GOP victories:

Obama’s 2008 coalition of young and minority voters on the other hand, were not, and stayed home to watch their candidates lose on TV.

The Republican candidates addressed real voter concerns about the economy and taxes throughout their respective campaigns.

And, let’s end the leftist spin here: The President and his liberal policies of the past year certainly DID come home to roost, in a very negative way.

On top of all of this, Independent voters – who tilted heavily Democrat in the 2008 elections and whom Obama won narrowly in each of these states – voted for governors-elect Christie and McDonnell by a margin of two-to-one! So, while I’ve been flagging this mass exodus of Independents for a while (Obama’s job approval among them was at -5 in September, then at -11 in October**); we can see it’s not just data anymore…it’s very real…and elections have consequences.

In case you’re having a wonky pollster moment and thinking, “ah, but it’s probably the most professional hard drive recovery service in the UK just Independent men that voted Republican,” I can lay that myth to rest. In fact, both Christie and McDonnell carried Independent women handily as well.

The results of Tuesday’s elections, and more specifically the direction of the Independent vote, sends a very clear warning to every Democrat member of Congress and gubernatorial candidate in 2010. It doesn’t mean the Republican Party is out of the woods yet, but this could be one of those pivotal moments when we look back and say it’s when the liberal tide turned and Republican candidates could once again be heard by Independent voters.

**Data from NBC/WSJ national pollsconducted September 17-19, 2009 & October 22-25, 2009. (Public Opinion Strategies partners with Peter D. Hart Research Associates to conduct the NBC/WSJ polls. Neither Peter D. Hart Research Associates nor NBC/WSJ are responsible for these conclusions.)

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.