Author
Topic: MI6GASM (Read 19802 times)

DwarfWhisper32 - Just a note to fella Holy 23's a Discordian has cited her Discordian Religion, as Legal Political Necessity Justification for her criminal act! Criminal act of sending Holy Five, crypticaly discordian coded 'rude: racially insulting' SMS's to a South African politician, at minute intervals of 23 and 32 minutes (in reference to those wonderful Minutemen Souls 32 being a reference to USMC 'article 32 hearing'). Intro OMGASM Political activism in service to the Politics of Disclosure - Litgasm Exopolitics, to President & First Lady Obama, with a liquids only hungerstrike starting 23 August, to 23 September...8/21/2009 1:45:44 AM

- So the New World Order does not actually exist?- Oh it exists, and how!Ask the slaves whose labour built the White House;Ask the slaves of today tied down to sweatshops and brothels to escape hunger;Ask most women, second class citizens, in a pervasive rape culture;Ask the non-human creatures who inhabit the planet:whales, bears, frogs, tuna, bees, slaughtered farm animals;Ask the natives of the Americas and Australia on whose landyou live today, on whose graves your factories, farms and neighbourhoods stand;ask any of them this, ask them if the New World Order is true;they'll tell you plainly: the New World Order… is you!

Just like the legal 'justus' establishment, have their codebook, to decipher their legal code words, namely, stare decises, et al; or as I refer in my legal argument documentation:

Quote

According to Professor David Skover, Professor of Law at Seattle University; Lawyers application of the Law is a form of critical literacy Interpretation of Legal Code Words; specifically:

“All law is interpretation. A lawyer uses words, which are inherently imprecise, and when a law is applied to the fact of a new situation what lawyers do is interpret the code words to deem them appropriately or inappropriately applied to the case at hand. To view the law means to understand interpretation. Law has more to do with critical literacy studies than it probably has to do with anything else.”

So, if the legal system, wants me to go round searching their codebooks, to decode their abstract vague terms of 'reasonableness' et al; then surely what is good for the goose is good for the gander, and I can devise my own legal code book, and even better up on their boring one, can make mine funny and fun...huh?? So then to understand what I mean, they got to go and decode my codewords, for 'reasonable' etc???

So, in that context, that is my Fleur-de-Lis Codebook, for my cryptic 'Crimen Injuria' text messages, for which I am being charged with five criminal charges of 'insulting the politicians' dignity!

My 'codebook' was part 4/5, of the legal ARgument. Namely it is the addendum to the 1,2,3, and 5, of 5. The others include the Chronology of FActs; Propositions of Law with reference to Authorities, and Application of FActs to Propositions of Law, etc.