Raleighhttp://www.newgeography.com/category/blog-topics/raleigh
The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.enRaleigh: Suburbanizing the City and Suburbshttp://www.newgeography.com/content/002091-raleigh-suburbanizing-city-and-suburbs
<p>New 2010 Census results indicate that the Raleigh metropolitan area (Raleigh-Cary) grew 42 percent from 2000 to 2010. This growth rate is projected to be the highest of any metropolitan area in the nation for the 2000 to 2010 period.</p>
<p>The historical core municipality of Raleigh grew strongly, from 288,000 to 404,000, a gain of 40 percent. This gain was aided by annexations that added nearly 30 percent to the area of the municipality (from 113 to 143 square miles). The annexations of recent decades have left the city of Raleigh with an overwhelmingly suburban urban form. In 1950, at the beginning of the post-World War II suburban boom, the city of Raleigh had a population of 66,000, living in a land area of only 11 square miles.</p>
<p>The suburbs (area outside the city of Raleigh) gained nearly two-thirds of the metropolitan area growth (65 percent) and now have 64 percent of the population. Over the last ten years, the suburbs have grown 43 percent.</p>
<p>The core urban area of Raleigh was one of the least densely populated in a major metropolitan areas in 2000, with under 1,700 persons per square mile, at slightly less than Charlotte, Nashville and Atlanta.</p>
http://www.newgeography.com/content/002091-raleigh-suburbanizing-city-and-suburbs#commentsCensus 2010demographicsNorth CarolinapopulationRaleighWed, 02 Mar 2011 19:38:05 -0500Wendell Cox2091 at http://www.newgeography.com