Addington et al v. US Airline Pilots Association et al

Filing
210

ORDER re 120 MOTION to Certify Class - Counsel for Plaintiffs and USAPA shall personally meet and confer regarding the class certification motion forthwith. The parties jointly shall prepare a Proposed Final Pretrial Order respecting certificati on and shall lodge it with the Court no later than 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 4. The Court will determine after reviewing the Proposed Final Pretrial Order whether an evidentiary hearing is required and what its scope should be. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 2/20/09. (see order for full details) (DMT, )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Don Addington; John Bostic; Mark) Burman; Afshin Iranpour; Roger Velez;) ) Steve Wargocki, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) US Airline Pilots Association; US) ) Airways, Inc., ) ) Defendants. __________________________________) ) Don Addington; John Bostic; Mark) Burman; Afshin Iranpour; Roger Velez;) ) Steve Wargocki, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Steven Bradford; Paul Diorio; Robert) Frear; Mark King; Douglas Mowery; John) ) Stephan, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. CV 08-1633-PHX-NVW (consolidated) ORDER
CV08-1728-PHX-NVW
Plaintiffs have moved to certify a class of "[a]ll pilots employed by the airline US Airways in September 2008 who were on the America West seniority list on September 20, 2005." (Doc. # 120.) Defendant USAPA opposes this motion. The briefing on this issue is scheduled to conclude on February 26, 2009. The Court has not yet determined whether the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
motion warrants a hearing, with or without presentation of evidence beyond what is submitted or will be submitted with the briefs. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Counsel for Plaintiffs and USAPA shall personally meet and confer regarding the class certification motion forthwith. Counsel shall discuss whether any live testimony or other evidence beyond what is submitted with the briefs is necessary for proper resolution of this issue, and if so, what evidence that might be. The parties jointly shall prepare a Proposed Final Pretrial Order respecting certification and shall lodge it with the Court no later than 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 4. The parties shall submit a copy of the Proposed Final Pretrial Order to the Court in WordPerfect® 9.0 or higher (or compatible) format by email to Wake_Chambers@azd.uscourts.gov. If the parties cannot reach
agreement on a joint order, portions of the order may be designated as separately filed. The Proposed Final Pretrial Order shall include the information prescribed in Sections D.1, E (limited to witnesses who will be called at the hearing), F (beyond exhibits submitted with the briefs), G, and K of the Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order for Bench Trial form found at www.azd.uscourts.gov under Judges & Courtrooms/Orders, Forms and Procedures/Judge Wake. Information shall not be set forth in the form of a question, but shall be presented in concise narrative statements. The Court will determine after reviewing the Proposed Final Pretrial Order whether an evidentiary hearing is required and what its scope should be. DATED this 20th day of February, 2009.
-2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.