This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/737,483 filed on 19 Apr. 2007.FIELD OF THE INVENTION The invention pertains generally to composition for controlling intestinal pathogenic organisms in avian species and, more particularly, to a multivalent antigen for inducing immunity to specific bacterial diseases and/or to enhance immunity inan infected organism.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Consumption of poultry products contaminated with Salmonella bacteria is a significant source of gastrointestinal infections in humans. For example, Salmonella enteritidis, especially phage type 4, has become more common in both poultry andhumans since the early 1980's. The prevalence of Salmonella typhimurium, on the other hand, has remained relatively stable. However, the spread of the antibiotic-resistant strain DT104 in domestic flocks gives some reason for concern. Accordingly, thepresence of Salmonella in commercial meat and food products is a major public health concern given that such infections can lead to serious illness or, in severe cases, death. Further, Salmonella infections in chickens, turkeys and ducks raise concernsfor poultry producers due to increasing rates of morbidity and mortality as well as losses attributable culling and/or rejection of infected birds. Salmonella infections can be spread via intraspecies or horizontal transmission, i.e., from animal to animal, and/or via interspecies or vertical transmission, i.e., from animal to humans. Generally, horizontal transmission of Salmonellabacteria is typically via exposure to environmental factors such as, for example, contaminated feces, bedding, nesting materials and/or other fomites. In contrast, vertical transmission of Salmonella bacteria is typically via oral exposure to thebacteria such by handling contaminated raw meats. Vertical transmission can also occur via shell contamination and/or internal transovarian contamination of the yolk of eggs

United States Patent: 7935355
&nbsp;
( 1 of 1 )
United States Patent
7,935,355
Sotomayor
May 3, 2011
Composition and method for controlling intestinal pathogenic organisms
Abstract
An antigen composition for stimulating an immune response in an
inoculated avian species to at least one intestinal pathogenic organism
includes naturally-occurring wild Salmonella enterica subspecies in
O-serogroups B, C.sub.3 and D. Subspecies in O-serogroup B can include
Salmonella typhimurium and/or Salmonella agona. Subspecies in O-serogroup
C.sub.3 can include Salmonella Kentucky. Subspecies in O-serogroup D can
include Salmonella enteritidis. The antigen composition can be used alone
or in combination with a Marek's Disease vaccine to reduce shedding of E.
coli and/or Salmonella bacteria.
Inventors:
Sotomayor; Konky (Palm Harbor, FL)
Assignee:
Nutritional Health Institute Laboratories, LLC
(Tallahassee,
FL)
Appl. No.:
12/025,568
Filed:
February 4, 2008
Related U.S. Patent Documents
Application NumberFiling DatePatent NumberIssue Date
11737483Apr., 2007
Current U.S. Class:
424/258.1 ; 424/184.1; 424/185.1; 424/192.1; 424/193.1; 424/194.1; 530/300
Current International Class:
A61K 39/112&nbsp(20060101); A61K 39/00&nbsp(20060101); A61K 39/385&nbsp(20060101); A61K 38/00&nbsp(20060101)
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
3674863
July 1972
Fisher et al.
3975517
August 1976
Wilson
4965068
October 1990
Stephan et al.
4971794
November 1990
Linggood et al.
5128127
July 1992
Beck
5132288
July 1992
Johnson et al.
5215746
June 1993
Stolle et al.
5538727
July 1996
Stolle et al.
5580557
December 1996
Kramer
5753268
May 1998
Stolle et al.
5792452
August 1998
Linde
5849349
December 1998
Stolle et al.
5853765
December 1998
Stolle et al.
5906826
May 1999
Emery et al.
5932250
August 1999
Stolle et al.
6027736
February 2000
Emery et al.
6056978
May 2000
Beck et al.
6231871
May 2001
Coloe
6399074
June 2002
Roland
6491910
December 2002
Schneitz et al.
6605285
August 2003
Sharma et al.
6706267
March 2004
Adalsteinsson et al.
6803035
October 2004
Greenblatt et al.
6866847
March 2005
Kelly-Aehle
6916478
July 2005
Kadurugamuwa et al.
6923957
August 2005
Lowery et al.
2001/0009668
July 2001
Richardson
2001/0021386
September 2001
Nuijten et al.
2002/0012666
January 2002
Greenblatt et al.
2002/0028215
March 2002
Kadurugamuwa et al.
2002/0034530
March 2002
Emery et al.
2003/0064073
April 2003
Emery et al.
2004/0170639
September 2004
Kelly-Aehle
2004/0234550
November 2004
Fan et al.
2006/0024323
February 2006
Emery et al.
2006/0196428
September 2006
Correa et al.
2007/0148146
June 2007
Doyle et al.
2008/0220022
September 2008
Le Gros et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
75374/94
Mar., 1995
AU
0 006 695
Jan., 1980
EP
97/29768
Aug., 1997
WO
03041734
May., 2003
WO
2007/106956
Sep., 2007
WO
Other References
Van Immerseel et al (Avian Pathology, 2004, Abstract only). cited by examiner
.
Ngeleka et al (Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, No. 8, p. 3118-3126). cited by examiner
.
P.A. Chacana et al., "Protection Conferred by a Live Salmonella Eneteritids Vaccine Against Fowl Typhoid in Laying Hens," Avian Diseases, Jun. 2006, pp. 280-283, vol. 50, No. 2, American Association of Avian Pathologists. U.S. cited by other.
Primary Examiner: Ford; Vanessa L.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Talati, LLC; Amin
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An antigen composition, comprising: at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B; at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3; and
at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D; the antigen composition stimulating an immune response in an inoculated avian species to at least one intestinal pathogenic organism, wherein the antigen is an in ovo vaccine and wherein the
Salmonella enterica subspecies comprise inactivated naturally-occurring wild strains from the O-serogroups B, C.sub.3, and D.
2. The antigen composition of claim 1, wherein the intestinal pathogenic organism comprises Clostridium perfringens.
3. The antigen composition of claim 1, wherein the intestinal pathogenic organism comprises Salmonella species.
4. The antigen composition of claim 1, wherein the intestinal pathogenic organism comprises Escherichia coli.
5. The antigen composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B is selected from Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and combinations thereof.
6. The antigen composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3 comprises Salmonella Kentucky.
7. The antigen composition of claim 1, wherein the at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D comprises Salmonella enteritidis.
8. A bacterin vaccine, comprising: about 46% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B; about 31% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D; and about 23% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3, wherein the bacterin
vaccine is an in ovo vaccine comprising naturally-occurring wild Salmonella enterica subspecies from the B, C.sub.3, and D O-serogroups.
9. The bacterin vaccine of claim 8, wherein the Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B comprise Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella agona, or a combination thereof.
10. The bacterin vaccine of claim 8, wherein the Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D comprises Salmonella enteritidis.
11. The bacterin vaccine of claim 10, wherein the Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3 comprises Salmonella Kentucky.
12. A method for reducing transmission of pathogenic gastrointestinal organisms, comprising: inoculating an avian species in ovo at about 18 days embryonic age with the vaccine according to claim 8.
13. An in ovo bacterin vaccine, comprising: a bacterin vaccine including naturally-occurring wild strains of: Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona, and Salmonella Kentucky; and a vaccine effective against Marek's
disease, the in ovo bacterin vaccine reducing a concentration of at least one pathogenic organism in a gastrointestinal tract of an inoculated avian species.
14. The in ovo vaccine of claim 13, wherein the Marek's disease vaccine is selected from the group consisting of HVT vaccines, SB-1 vaccines, and combinations thereof.
15. The in ovo vaccine of claim 13, wherein the pathogenic organism is selected from the group consisting of E. coli spp., Salmonella spp., or a combination thereof.
16. The in ovo vaccine of claim 13, wherein the avian species is a domestic fowl selected from the group consisting of chickens, ducks, geese and turkeys.
17. A method for reducing transmission of pathogenic gastrointestinal organisms, comprising: inoculating an avian species in ovo at about 18 days embryonic age with the vaccine according to claim 13.
Description
This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/737,483 filed on 19 Apr. 2007.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention pertains generally to composition for controlling intestinal pathogenic organisms in avian species and, more particularly, to a multivalent antigen for inducing immunity to specific bacterial diseases and/or to enhance immunity in
an infected organism.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Consumption of poultry products contaminated with Salmonella bacteria is a significant source of gastrointestinal infections in humans. For example, Salmonella enteritidis, especially phage type 4, has become more common in both poultry and
humans since the early 1980's. The prevalence of Salmonella typhimurium, on the other hand, has remained relatively stable. However, the spread of the antibiotic-resistant strain DT104 in domestic flocks gives some reason for concern. Accordingly, the
presence of Salmonella in commercial meat and food products is a major public health concern given that such infections can lead to serious illness or, in severe cases, death. Further, Salmonella infections in chickens, turkeys and ducks raise concerns
for poultry producers due to increasing rates of morbidity and mortality as well as losses attributable culling and/or rejection of infected birds.
Salmonella infections can be spread via intraspecies or horizontal transmission, i.e., from animal to animal, and/or via interspecies or vertical transmission, i.e., from animal to humans. Generally, horizontal transmission of Salmonella
bacteria is typically via exposure to environmental factors such as, for example, contaminated feces, bedding, nesting materials and/or other fomites. In contrast, vertical transmission of Salmonella bacteria is typically via oral exposure to the
bacteria such by handling contaminated raw meats. Vertical transmission can also occur via shell contamination and/or internal transovarian contamination of the yolk of eggs produced by infected birds.
The basis for good control of Salmonella infections in farm environments, in particular, in poultry farms, is good farming and hygiene practices. Such practices include, for example, managing and preventing contamination of feeds, monitoring of
animal health, cleaning and disinfection of coops and pens, and control of pest species such as, for examples, rodents. Testing and removal of infected or pathogen-positive animals from production and/or contact with uninfected animals are also vital to
controlling horizontal and/or vertical transmission of such infections.
Poultry infected with Salmonella bacteria generally develop a strong immune response to the pathogen which is typically manifested by progressive reduction in excretion of the organism and reduced disease and excretion upon subsequent challenge. Accordingly, there is a need for an effective means for inducing an immune response to Salmonella bacteria in poultry which results in reduced disease and excretion or shedding of the bacteria while reducing productivity losses attributable to culling
and/or rejection of infected birds.
Recently, vaccination of commercial poultry flocks to increase resistance against pathogenic exposure to Salmonella has become more prevalent particularly in view of increasing public awareness. However, such vaccination programs are generally
difficult, time consuming and/or prohibitively expensive to administer on a commercial production scale. Accordingly, there is a need for an effective means for vaccinating domestic poultry and fowl against Salmonella infections.
Additionally, it is generally believed that vaccination is not a control option for serovars other than Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium which can be present on poultry farms. It is also generally believed that vaccination has
limited effect on improving animal health and welfare and such vaccines are primarily used for public health reasons. Accordingly, there is a need for an antigen composition or vaccine effective to result in improved avian health and welfare such as can
be manifested by increased weight gain and reduced mortality.
Further, some antigens may interfere with efficacy of other vaccines or medications administered simultaneously with and/or subsequent to vaccination. Additionally or alternatively, particular antigens may interfere with or affect the accuracy
of traditional test or screening tools used to detect active or prior infection. Accordingly, there is a demand for a Salmonella antigen which can be administered to domestic poultry and fowl which does not reduce the effectiveness of other vaccines
such as, for example, Marek's disease vaccines.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A general object of the invention is to provide a multivalent antigen for inducing an immune response and/or providing enhanced immunity to a pathogenic organism such as Salmonella spp.
A more specific object of the invention is to overcome one or more of the problems described above.
The general object of the invention can be obtained, at least in part, through a Salmonella multivalent antigen composition comprising or consisting of at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B, at least one Salmonella
enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3, and at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D. The composition induces an immune response in an inoculated avian species to at least one intestinal pathogenic organism. The Salmonella
enterica subspecies can include or consist of naturally-occurring wild strains from O-serogroups B, C.sub.3 and/or D.
The prior art generally fails to provide a Salmonella-containing multivalent antigen composition which is as effective as desired in inducing an immune response to at least one intestinal pathogenic organism such as, for example, Salmonella spp. which is manifested by a reduced fecal count in an inoculated avian species. The prior art further generally fails to provide a multivalent antigen composition which can be easily and effectively administered in a commercial farm environment at a
reduced cost. The prior art additionally fails to provide a multivalent antigen composition that can be utilized alone or in combination with other vaccine products without reducing the efficacy of either vaccine component and/or the ability to detect
or diagnose particular diseases within inoculated birds.
The invention further comprehends a bacterin vaccine comprising or consisting of about 46% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B, about 31% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D, and about 23% Salmonella enterica subspecies
in O-serogroup C.sub.3. Subspecies in O-serogroup B can include or consist of Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and/or combinations thereof. Subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3 can include or consist of Salmonella Kentucky. Subspecies in
O-serogroup D can include or consist of Salmonella enteritidis such as, for example, ATCC strain 13076.
The invention additionally comprehends an in ovo vaccine including a bacterin vaccine and a Marek's disease vaccine. The bacterin vaccine comprises or consists of ATCC strain 13076 of Salmonella enteritidis, ATCC strain 14028 of Salmonella
typhimurium, Salmonella agona, and Salmonella Kentucky. The in ovo vaccine reduces a concentration of at least one pathogenic organism in a gastrointestinal tract of an inoculated avian species.
As used herein the term "bacterin" or "bacterin vaccine" refers to a vaccine composition generally comprised of dead or inactivated bacteria species.
As used herein the terms "about" and "substantially" when used in conjunction with a percentage or the term "equal" refer to a value falling within a range of .+-.1 percentage point. For example, a concentration of about 5% includes all
concentrations falling within the range of 4% to 6%.
Other objects and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the examples and the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a chart showing the effect of an antigen composition of the invention on Marek's Disease vaccine titration in culture.
FIG. 2 is a chart showing the effect of an antigen composition of the invention on Marek's Disease vaccine re-isolation titers in vivo.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The invention provides a Salmonella multivalent antigen or antigen composition which stimulates an immune response in an inoculated avian species to at least one intestinal pathogenic organism. The Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can
include or consist of Salmonella enterica subspecies from O-serogroups B, C.sub.3 and D which in combination stimulate an immune response in an inoculated avian species to at least one intestinal pathogenic organism such as, for example, Clostridium
perfringens, Salmonella species and/or Escherichia coli.
The Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can be employed alone and/or in combination with other bacterial strains, such as, for example, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and/or Aerobacter aerogenes, and/or other poultry vaccine
compositions such as, for example, a Marek's disease vaccine. Further, the Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can be provided and/or utilized as a live or bacterin vaccine alone or in combination with other bacterial strains and/or poultry
vaccine compositions.
Advantageously, the Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can be administered as an in ovo antigen vaccine. For example, the Salmonella multivalent antigen composition, such as in the form of a bacterin vaccine, can be utilized in a method
for reducing the transmission of pathogenic gastrointestinal organisms that includes or consists of inoculating an avian species in ovo at about 18 days embryonic age with the bacterin vaccine.
Such a Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can include or consist of at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B, at least one Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3 and at least on Salmonella enterica
subspecies in O-serogroup D. Suitably, the Salmonella enterica subspecies include or consist of naturally-occurring wild strains from the O-serogroups B, C.sub.3 and/or D.
It has been surprisingly discovered that a combination of Salmonella enterica subspecies from O-serogroups B, C.sub.3 and D works synergistically to reduce not only the prevalence of Salmonella sp. but also other gastrointestinal pathogenic
organisms in avian fecal matter. Without being bound thereby, it is believed that the combination of Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroups B, C.sub.3 and D work synergistically when administered in the form of a vaccine, and particularly in the
form of an in ovo bacterin vaccine, to induce an immune response in inoculated avian species which reduces or eliminates colonization of gastrointestinal pathogens. Such immune response, induced preferably prior to hatch, has been found to reduce the
prevalence of certain gastrointestinal pathogens such as, for example, E. coli, Clostridium perfringens and/or Salmonella spp., in avian fecal matter which in turn reduces the likelihood of vertical and/or horizontal transmission of such organisms to
other species.
In accordance with certain embodiments, a Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can include or consist of about 46% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B, about 31% Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D and about 23%
Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3.
Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B can include or consist of Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and/or combinations thereof. In accordance with certain embodiments, the Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup B can
include or consist of ATCC strain 14028 of Salmonella typhimurium. Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup C.sub.3 can include or consist of Salmonella Kentucky. Salmonella enterica subspecies in O-serogroup D can include or consist of Salmonella
enteritidis such as, for example, ATCC Strain 13076 of Salmonella enteritidis.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the Salmonella multivalent antigen composition can be included in an in ovo bacterin vaccine including or consisting of: a bacterin vaccine including or consisting of ATCC stain 13076 of Salmonella
enteritidis, ATCC 14028 of Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and Salmonella Kentucky; and a Marek's disease vaccine such as, for example, an HVT vaccine, a SB-1 vaccine and/or a combination thereof. The in ovo bacterin vaccine reduces a
concentration of at least one pathogenic organism in a gastrointestinal tract of an inoculated avian species such as, for example, domestic fowl selected from the group including but not limited to chickens, ducks, geese and/or turkeys. Such in ovo
bacterin vaccine can be administered to the avian species at about 18 day's embryonic age.
In accordance with another aspect, the Salmonella multivalent antigen composition forms an integral part of a multivalent antigen composition that includes or consists of other and/or additional bacterial strains and/or poultry vaccine
compositions. For example, the multivalent antigen composition can include seven field strains of E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aerobacter aerogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and Salmonella Kentucky.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the multivalent antigen or antigen composition stimulates an immune response to an intestinal pathogenic organism selected from Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella spp., E. coli or a combination thereof
Such immune response can be manifested as a reduction in fecal bacterial counts for a particular pathogen such as, for example, reduction in Salmonella spp. fecal bacteria counts and/or E. coli fecal bacterial counts. Such immune response can
additionally or alternatively be manifested as a reduction in lesion formation upon exposure to Clostridium perfringens.
Various strains of E. coli bacteria can be included in the antigen composition. Suitably, such strains of E. coli bacteria can be selected from ATCC strain 25922, a University of Delaware field isolate, one or more Delmarva field isolates or a
combination thereof. In accordance with one embodiment, the antigen composition includes seven field strains of E. coli bacteria including ATCC strain 25922, a University of Delaware field isolate and five Delmarva field isolates.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the antigen composition includes about 67% of seven strains of E. coli bacteria. Suitably, each strain of E. coli bacteria is present in an approximately equal amount.
Various strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are suitable for use in the antigen composition. In accordance with one embodiment, the antigen composition can include ATCC strain 27653 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Suitably, the antigen composition
can include about 10% Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
The antigen composition further includes Aerobacter aerogenes such as in a concentration of about 10%. In accordance with certain aspects of the invention, the antigen composition is or should be free or devoid of Enterobacter aerogenes and/or
Klebsiella pneumoniae.
The antigen composition also includes at least four strains of Salmonella species. In particular, the antigen composition includes Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and Salmonella Kentucky. In accordance with
certain embodiments, the antigen composition can include ATCC strain 13076 of Salmonella enteritidis and/or ATCC strain 14028 of Salmonella typhimurium.
Suitably, the antigen composition, in accordance with one embodiment, can include about 4% Salmonella enteritidis, about 3% Salmonella typhimurium, about 3% Salmonella agona and about 3% Salmonella Kentucky.
Suitably, the multivalent antigen or antigen composition can be utilized as or in an in ovo vaccine for inoculating avian species or domestic fowl. For example, about 0.005 ml to about 0.05 ml of the multivalent antigen or antigen composition
can be used to inoculate an embryonated egg. In accordance with certain embodiments, the multivalent antigen or antigen composition can be given in a dose of about 0.0063 ml to about 0.0375 ml per embryonated egg.
The multivalent antigen or antigen composition is suitable for use alone as a bacterin vaccine or in combination with one or more other vaccine preparations. For example, the antigen composition can be administered sequentially with or
simultaneously with another vaccine preparation such as, for example, a Marek's Disease vaccine.
In accordance with one embodiment, the antigen composition can be mixed or combined with a Marek's Disease vaccine. Such combined or mixed vaccine comprises a bacterin vaccine including seven strains of E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Aerobacter aerogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella agona and Salmonella Kentucky and a Marek's Disease vaccine. The Marek's Disease vaccine can include an HVT vaccine, a SB-1 vaccine or a bivalent vaccine including a
mixture or combination of HVT and SB-1 strains. Advantageously, the bacterin and Marek's Disease vaccine may be combined in any suitable ratio. For example, the combined vaccine may have a bacterin vaccine to Marek's Disease vaccine ratio in the range
of about 1:15 to 15:1. In accordance with certain embodiments, the bacterin vaccine and the Marek's Disease vaccine can be combined in a 1:1 ratio.
The combined bacterin-Marek's Disease vaccine reduces a concentration of at least one pathogenic organism in a gastrointestinal tract of an inoculated avian species. Such pathogenic organism can include E. coli, Salmonella spp. or a
combination thereof.
Suitably, the combined bacterin-Marek's Disease vaccine can be an in ovo vaccine suitable for inoculating an avian species or domestic fowl such as, for example, chickens, ducks, geese and/or turkeys. For example, the combined bacterin-Marek's
Disease vaccine can be administered in ovo in a dose of about 0.005 ml to about 0.1 ml combined vaccine per embryonated egg. In accordance with certain embodiments, a dose of the combined bacterin-Marek's Disease vaccine can include about 0.0063 ml to
about 0.0375 ml bacterin vaccine.
A method for reducing transmission of pathogenic gastrointestinal organisms includes inoculating an avian species in ovo at about 18 days embryonic age with the above-described antigen composition alone such as, for example, as a bacterin
vaccine or in combination with another vaccine preparation such as, for example, a Marek's Disease vaccine.
EXAMPLES
Antigen Composition
An antigen composition was produced using various strains of bacteria, shown in TABLE 1, below, commonly found in poultry and/or humans. Each bacteria isolate was initially individually grown in 1000 ml of Nutrient Broth (Sigma N7519) at
35.+-.1.degree. C. for 24.+-.2 hours. After the incubation period, each broth was centrifuged for approximately 10 minutes at 5000 rpm in individual centrifuge sectors to separate the cells from the broth. The supernatant was then aseptically removed
from each centrifuge vessel. The remaining cultures from each tube were then re-suspended in Butterfield's Phosphate diluent and tested to determine purity. The purified cultures collectively formed a Master Seed.
The above steps were repeated until the quantity of Master Seed required to produce mass quantities of Working Seed stock was achieved. Following determination of purity and specie, all Working Seed stock batches were mixed, separated into
batch fermentation vessels and grown at 35.+-.1.degree. C. for 24.+-.2 hour periods. At the completion of each batch, the entire batch was carefully mixed and a sample of each culture was then plated onto Nutrient Agar. Colonies were counted after a
further incubation period of 24.+-.2 hours at 35.+-.1.degree. C. using 10-fold dilutions up to 10.sup.10 dilution rate. Plates with CFUs between 30 and 300 were counted.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Bacterial component CFU Counts E. coli Isolate #1 1.36 .times. 10.sup.10 E. coli Isolate #2 2.03 .times. 10.sup.10 E. coli Isolate #3 6.80 .times. 10.sup.9 E. coli Isolate #4 2.92 .times. 10.sup.10 E. coli Isolate #5
1.28 .times. 10.sup.10 E. coli Isolate #6 2.13 .times. 10.sup.10 E. coli Isolate #7 5.30 .times. 10.sup.10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2.14 .times. 10.sup.9 Aerobacter aerogenes 9.40 .times. 10.sup.8 Salmonella enteritidis 1.86 .times. 10.sup.9
Salmonella typhimurium 2.38 .times. 10.sup.9 Salmonella agona 4.10 .times. 10.sup.9 Salmonella Kentucky 6.50 .times. 10.sup.9
The final counts were used to dilute and mix the individual cultures into the final antigen composition or bacterin vaccine, as shown in TABLE 2, below. The bacteria were then killed by autoclaving at 121.degree. C. for 15.+-.2 minutes. This
procedure was then repeated to ensure total bacteria kill.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Bacterial Component Concentration E. coli (7 field strains) 67% (each strain in .apprxeq. equal amounts) Pseudomonas Aeruginosa 10% Aerobacter aerogenes 10% Salmonella enteritidis 4% Salmonella typhimurium 3% Salmonella
agona 3% Salmonella Kentucky 3%
Effect on Lesion Formation Due to Clostridium Perfringens Exposure
Fourteen treatment groups of Ross (Male).times.Cobb (Female) broilers were in ovo inoculated with either a saline control or the antigen composition described in TABLE 2 at an embryonic age of 18 days. The fourteen treatment groups include
seven (7) control groups each including 20 male and 20 female chicks and seven (7) vaccine groups each including 20 male and 20 female chicks.
All birds were inoculated with Clostridium perfringens (10.sup.4 per bird) on post-hatch Day 8 to induce necrotic enteritis. Four male and four female birds from each control group and each vaccine group were humanely euthanized on Days 21 and
49, necropsied and the intestinal tracts visually inspected for signs of necrotic enteritis and/or coccidiosis. The intestinal lesion scores including both coccidiosis signs and necrotic enteritis signs were recorded. Lesions were scored on a scale of
0 to 4 as follows: 0=No lesions found; 1=Slight redness with no cell sloughing (mucus); 2=Moderate redness and/or slight cell sloughing; 3=Severe redness and/or severe cell sloughing; and 4=Actual bleeding observed.
The lesion score data, as summarized in TABLE 3, below, indicate that birds inoculated with the above-described antigen composition or bacterin vaccine had a statistically lower rate of development of intestinal lesions between Days 8 and 21.
Lesion scores recorded on Day 49 for both the control and vaccinated populations were not significantly different. Accordingly, it is believed that inoculation with the antigen composition of the invention induces an immune response to the intestinal
pathogen Clostridium perfringens thereby reducing the incidence, duration and/or severity of necrotic enteritis in avian populations.
Effect on Preharvest Intestinal Crop Bacteria.
All of the birds from the fourteen treatment groups described above were additionally inoculated with Escherichia coli (10.sup.6 per bird) and Salmonella spp. (10.sup.4 per bird) administered via oral gavage on post-hatch Day 15. Eight birds
(4 males and 4 females) from each control and each vaccine group were humanely euthanized and necropsied on post-hatch Days 21 and 49. Crop content bacteria from each bird were plated on an appropriate agar and fecal E. coli and Salmonella spp.
bacteria counts were recorded.
The fecal bacteria data, summarized in TABLE 3, below, indicate that birds inoculated with above-described antigen composition or bacterin vaccine had a statistically lower concentration of both E. coli and Salmonella bacteria present in the
crop contents. Accordingly, it is believed that inoculation with the antigen composition of the invention induces or stimulates an immune response to E. coli and Salmonella resulting in reduced fecal bacteria content as well as reduced shedding of
bacteria.
Additionally, it was determined, as summarized in TABLE 3, below, that birds inoculated with the above-described antigen composition exhibited an increase in average weight gain over the duration of the 49 day study.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Day 21 Day 49 Criterion Control Vaccine Control Vaccine Average Lesion Score 1.018 0.250 0.179 0.107 Std Dev. 0.29 0.09 0.15 0.10 C.V. 28.93 37.80 82.46 97.18 Fecal E. coli count (per ml) 2085.0 786.2 1479.9 532.1 Std
Dev. 158.80 138.90 161.02 67.59 C.V. 7.62 17.67 10.88 12.70 Fecal Salmonella spp. 160.0 122.4 129.7 94.7 count (per ml) Std Dev. 16.85 11.10 12.86 9.98 C.V. 10.53 9.07 9.92 10.54 Average Weight Gain (g) 547.648 580.171 2146.721 2225.416 Std Dev.
7.13 7.97 58.50 59.18 C.V. 1.30 1.37 2.72 2.66
Effect on Marek's Disease Vaccine
A study was conducted to determine if the above-described antigen composition or bacterin vaccine if administered in combination with commercially available Marek's Disease vaccine negatively impacted the replication of the vaccine viruses in
cell culture or in vivo. Such a negative impact, as determined by decreases in the ability to re-isolate vaccine viruses at one week post-hatch, would suggest that the antigen composition may decrease Marek's Disease vaccine efficacy.
Effect on Marek's Disease Vaccine in Culture.
To assess the effect of the above-described antigen composition on Marek's Disease vaccine preparations, the antigen composition and its diluent were obtained at 4.times. concentration. These were added to 4.times. stocks of HVT and SB-1 to
generate 2.times. stocks of HVT and SB-1. Upon mixing of equal amounts, this yielded 1.times. bivalent vaccines containing either 1.times. diluent or 1.times. antigen composition.
The vaccine stocks were titrated independently from the 4.times. stocks and also titrated from each of the 1.times. final stocks. This was to determine the effect of the antigen composition on HVT and SB-1 replication, in culture and to
determine if the antigen composition would interfere with titration of commercial vaccine. In each case, a commercial diluent was used for diluting the vaccines. Vaccine, viruses and diluent were obtained from commercial sources.
As indicated by the titration data, summarized in TABLE 4, below, and shown in FIG. 1, the antigen composition did not negatively affect Marek's Disease replication in cell culture. Titration of the vaccine stocks after either diluent or
antigen composition addition showed essentially identical titers.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Std Vaccine PFU/Vial Dose Dilution Mean Plaque # Bird Dose (PFU) Dev. HVT 1.59 .times. 10.sup.7 4X 1:50 120.8 (.+-.8.5) 6040 1028 SB-1 4.2 .times. 10.sup.5 4X 1:50 123 (.+-.14) 3075 742 HVT + diluent 1X 1:100 51.75
(.+-.7.5) 5175 750 SB-1 + diluent 1X 1:100 20.75 (.+-.6.4) 2075 640 HVT + antigen 1X 1:100 53.3 (.+-.3.9) 5325 386 SB-1 + antigen 1X 1:100 26.5 (.+-.3.9) 2650 387
Effect on Marek's Disease Vaccine In Vivo.
Eggs from a commercial broiler chicken strain, Ross X Cobb breed, were inoculated at 18 days embryonic age with either a bivalent HVT/SB-1 Marek's Disease vaccine (5000 PFU/bird HVT+2500 PFU/bird SB-1) mixed with a control diluent
(vaccine+diluent) or a vaccine including the bivalent Marek's Disease vaccine mixed with the above-described antigen composition (vaccine+antigen). Post-hatch, an equal number of male and female chicks were randomly placed in grow out pens and grown
under practical commercial conditions.
At one week post-hatch chickens were bled via cardiac puncture, euthanized and the spleens were pooled into groups. The vaccine+diluent and vaccine+antigen groups were each comprised of four (4) pools of three (3) birds.
Blood and spleens were pooled and PBMC were purified from the whole blood by histopaque centrifugation. Spleen cells were washed, counted and plated at 2.times.10 cells in triplicate dishes for each pool. PBMC were not co-cultivated with CEF
monolayers, as HVT and SB-1 infection is characteristically low at this time. At six (6) days post-plating, the dishes were examined and plaques for HVT and SB-1 were counted.
The above procedure was repeated three times over the course of four (4) weeks, i.e., a total of 16 pools of birds from the vaccine+diluent and a total of 16 pools of birds from the vaccine+antigen groups were inoculated and evaluated. The data
obtained from the re-isolation counts were subjected to Chi-square and Students t-test analysis, the results of which are summarized in TABLE 5, below, and shown in FIG. 2.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Vaccine + Diluent Vaccine + Antigen Group # Strain Count Group # Strain Count 1A HVT 48 .+-. 1 1B HVT 47 .+-. 13 SB-1 21 .+-. 3 SB-1 13 .+-. 1 2A HVT 58 .+-. 14 2B HVT 56 .+-. 22 SB-1 16 .+-. 3 SB-1 19 .+-. 2 3A
HVT 67 .+-. 16 3B HVT 37 .+-. 2 SB-1 17 .+-. 4 SB-1 15 .+-. 2 4A HVT 42 .+-. 1 4B HVT 69 .+-. 8 SB-1 25 .+-. 5 SB-1 20 .+-. 1 HVT Overall 54 HVT Overall 52 Average Average SB-1 Overall 20 HVT Overall 17 Average Average
The results in TABLE 5 indicate that comparable counts of HVT and SB-1 plagues were obtained from the two treatment groups and, thus, overall no significant differences were found for either the HVT or the SB-1 data.
In Week 4 of the study, a statistically significant difference was found in the HVT counts between the vaccine+diluent and the vaccine+antigen groups. The antigen was found to increase the titers of HVT re-isolated from inoculated chickens at
one-week post-hatch. This is believed to indicate an advantage conferred on the replication of HVT. Conversely, a small but statistically significant difference was found between SB-1 re-isolated from the inoculated chickens.
Overall, the bacterin vaccine or antigen composition did not negatively affect Marek's Disease replication in vivo. Thus, it is unlikely that the antigen composition would decrease the efficacy of Marek's Disease vaccines if employed in an in
ovo vaccination program. Moreover, the addition of the antigen composition should not negatively affect the ability to titer vaccines.
While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain embodiments thereof, and many details have been put forth for the purpose of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the
invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.
* * * * *