Would the US government let Jesus cure cancer?

In the 1990s, I watched a federal trial in a Los Angeles courtroom. The defendant was charged with selling medical drugs without a license to practice medicine.

The defendant was prepared to argue that a) the substance he was selling was naturally produced in the body and b) it was effective.

The prosecution moved to exclude such testimony, on the grounds that it was irrelevant.

The judge agreed. Therefore, the trial was nasty, brutish, and short. The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to prison for several years.

This is how the federal bureaucracy operates. “Do you have a government-issued license to heal? No? You’re a criminal.”

I believe that if Jesus of Nazareth were walking the Earth today, in the United States, he would be arrested on the same grounds.

This would be particularly so if he were curing cancer.

Jesus wouldn’t be granted a license. No license? Guilty.

More importantly, the trillion-dollar cancer industry survives and makes its money by treating cancer, so curing it would be a major threat.

Imagine this extreme case: in a stadium packed with 50,000 people who have been diagnosed with cancer, Jesus of Nazareth waves his hand and cures all of them in a few seconds.

Now he is threatening the profits of many companies, to say nothing of the power of the government, which backs the chemo-radiation-surgery monopoly to the hilt.

So he is arrested. He is put on trial. He opts to defend himself without an attorney. He tells the court that curing cancer is no crime.

The prosecuting attorney objects. “Your Honor,” he says, “whether or not this man has cured cancer is beside the point. He has no license to practice medicine. That is why we are here today. We are simply establishing that a) he was practicing medicine and b) he has no government-issued license. That is the scope of this proceeding.”

The judge agrees. The verdict is decided. Guilty.

Of course, on another front, the major media, who depend for their existence on pharmaceutical advertising, take the ball and run with it. The networks and major newspapers seek out “experts,” who emphatically state that what Jesus of Nazareth “performed” in the stadium was mere hypnotism. It was all a placebo effect. Whatever sudden “remissions” may have occurred are just temporary. Tragically, the cancers will return.

Not only that, these 50,000 people have effectively been sidetracked and diverted from seeking “real care from real doctors.” With chemo, with radiation, with surgery, they would have stood a chance of surviving and living long normal lives.

Other media pundits send up this flag: “Many of those present in the stadium were bitter clingers to their religion. They refuse to accept science. They are living in the past. They favor superstition over real medical care. In fact, they are threatening the whole basis of Obamacare, since other confused and deluded Americans may now turn away from doctors and seek snake-oil salesmen and preachers for healing.”

From the highest perches of political power in this country, the word quietly goes out to the media: don’t follow up on those people who were in the stadium; don’t try to track them; don’t compile statistics on their survival rates; move on to other stories (distractions); let this whole madness die down.

But among the citizenry, an awareness spreads: the government is controlling healing through its issuance of licenses. That’s how the government is essentially protecting one form of “healing” and enabling it to become an all-encompassing cartel.

What would be the alternative or the adjunct to licenses?

Contracts.

Contracts are agreements entered into by consenting adults, who assume responsibility for the outcomes. In the case of healing, a contract would specify that people have a right to be wrong.

Let’s say two consenting adults, Jim and Frank, agree to allow Frank to treat Jim for his arthritis with water from a well on Frank’s land.

The two men acknowledge that no liability will be attached to the outcome. In other words, whether Jim get better or gets worse, no one is going file a suit. No one is going to go to the government for redress of wrongs.

The well water may be wonderful or it may be completely useless. Both men understand and acknowledge that. But they assert a right to try the treatment, because they are free.

Immediately people say, “This is ridiculous. Water can’t cure arthritis. Frank is cheating Jim. Jim is a victim. He needs to see a doctor. He needs to go on arthritis drugs.”

No, Jim doesn’t have to do anything. He is free.

To put it another way, Jim has the right to be right or wrong. It’s his decision, which is beyond the scope of any authority.

If government tries to remove that right from all of us, it is essentially saying it knows what is correct, it knows what is true, it knows what we need and require, and it’s going to give it to us even if it has to shove it down our throats. Does that sound like freedom to you?

Perhaps you’re familiar with the raid on James Stewart and Rawesome Foods in Los Angeles. Rawesome was a club. People joined voluntarily, so they could get access to raw milk. The government wants to limit access to raw milk. Prosecutors are apparently claiming Mr. Stewart has no license to sell raw milk.

A club like this rests on a contract. Consenting adults agree to buy and ingest a product. They assume full responsibility. They don’t care what the government says or thinks about the product.

And you see, that’s the problem for the government. They can’t allow these clubs to spread. If they did, contracts would begin to supersede licenses. People would wake up and realize they have a way to circumvent the whims, wishes, and arbitrary authority of the federal government.

A way through which they assert their freedoms and rights beyond what government claims.

I maintain that if Jesus of Nazareth lived in the United States today, and if he went around curing cancer, he would be arrested. He wouldn’t be charged with blasphemy or treason, as scholars state he once was. He would be charged with something much simpler and more mundane: practicing medicine without a license.

And he would be convicted and sentenced.

Because then and now, the government, in its throne of corruption, wants to protect its proprietary and illegal interests.

Jon Rappoport

The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Of course it’s true that the federal government, especially, is a criminal syndicate, even to the
extent of being ala-Capone. Obama is play Capone right now, for example, and his underlings do what they are told. Only slightly different levels. Capone’s gangsters went to individual store owners and promised that they (Capone’s men) would not break things up and rob the place if the shop paid x-dollars for special protection. When some shopowners said, “Hell, no,” Capone’s men broke the place up then and there and the shop owner relented or was murdered. Federal gubmit, samo-samo. The feds say, “We want y’all thinking a certain way for y’all’s own safety.” If a certain preponderance of citizens say, “No, we won’t think that way,” then gubmit agents will bust loose with a “9-11” (or other false flag thingy) to convince the recalcitrant citizens that they “need” to think “that certain way” in order that the gubmit can prevent such as 9-11 ever happening again.

It is all a Capon-type protection racket, of course. Although they don’t usually attack individuals much, in an of itself (unless it be a POTUS or whatever), if an individual gets too public about not “needing” gubmit protection, and it seems as if the public is going over to his side, the gubmit will attack him (via patsies or whatever) so that he may be held up (via press coverage) as an example of what it is like to fall outside the gubmit “protections.”

Bonnie and Clyde simply didn’t wear badges. It’s why the gubmit did not like them. Go through the rigmarole, put on a badge, and then start kicking in heads, shooting people, robbing, raping and vandalizing. But do it in the name of the law. One can still keep the booty or enjoy the murder, mayhem, sex, robbery and theft, but do it in the name of the law.

Jon – I get the premise, but please don’t descend into salvationist ideology, even if you’re just trying to make a point. There are enough fundamentalist morons running around, without reinforcing their primitive belief systems. Abrahamic Monotheism is a deadly virus.

The clarity, humor, and ease of your writing makes accepting the bitter pill of our current human predicament less painful to swallow, but might it equally become the pain relieving narcotic of “knowing” that lulls us into a “well informed” yet passively numb and fatally paralyzed sleep? “I just knew I was going to get run over by that bus!”

Your impassioned intent is clearly to rouse the already sleeping, but if a still thoroughly disruptive and thus “illegal” Jesus would have but a prayer of making some difference in our modern world, what could I with a few friends and family possibly do? How can I take some responsibility for altering the impending course of my own, my children’s, and my species’ demise? What awakening would enable me to move beyond meaningless gestures to engage some balanced and wisely potent action with others that hasn’t already failed its trial?

Jesus suggested giving to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and attending with care what truly belongs to us. Our modern corporate Caesar has stated its intent to own and control every scrap of existence, including land, sea, air, and space; the bodies, cells, and genes of all life; the brains, minds, and whatever soul remains of human beings, along with what informational and technological capital they can produce. What then remains unrendered of our lives?

You have suggested that our imagination and all it creates is what truly belongs to us, but what is this beyond child’s play and escapist fancy? What as yet unknown inner technology might a magus seek to imagine? What would stand as the inner equivalent of the last 200 years of advancement in outer physical science and technology? While much of humanity desperately clings to the shreds of two and three thousand year old religious dogma (as distinct from personal experience) for their technology of ethical and moral discernment, the gifted but barely human elite build and direct physical machines that quickly approach the “singularity” point of no return for free and natural human beings.

What artistry of imagined vision could unleash an inner technology of soul and spirit that would open the doorways that lead beyond this helpless hopeless grind? What if this as yet humanly unthinkable vision lies completely outside of the “mind-matrix” within which all of our species is currently entranced and bound? Who then lives outside and how might we ask them what they see?

What of the billions of worlds of (what humans consider) “alien” beings who have been creatively evolved millions if not billions of years beyond our own kind? What might they be willing to share about getting through the extinction level events we now face, and how would we ask them with sufficient openness, humility, respect, and worthiness to get their plurality of response? How might we “pray” among a diversity of “alien” angels, and who among us is prepared to hear what lies beyond our current capacity to imagine? What would be expected of a species such as ours before it could be trusted with such gifts?

“Childhood’s End?” Who among our kind will rise up to stand that ground?

The disavow of inherent self authority is an act that renders personal free will susceptible to externally imagined forms of collectivized authority (religion, science, government).
Here’s a video I just finished that uses art (mostly paintings) to explain this point as well as explaining how this authority progressed from religion and divine right to secular government in a science-based reality.http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tO98o3jD0ws&feature=c4-feed-u

If you are a cancer patient, know that with hemp oil that cancer can be cured, my cancer have been cured with this hemp oil.
The cancer centre london have made this hemp oil available to all cancer patients world wide to get this hemp oil in affordable price and in order stop chemo and radiation surgeries which causes damages to the body cells and to eradicate cancer disease.

[…] Link – The article goes on to pose the predictable (yet, admittedly intriguing) intellectual exercise concluding that if Jesus were alive today and traveling the United States curing the No. 1 killer he would be locked up. Of course this is true as we have seen many a good man/woman get hounded and locked up for helping people (i.e. Wilhelm Reich), but it happens to be utter pig slop. Anyone paying attention to the activities of the Federal U.S. government knows that anyone lending assistance to the people that is superior to their own is in for a nasty surprise – that’s why we’re in this movement; it’s called belabouring the point and diluting content quality of the global brain. Why is he doing this? Could it be because he knows that 1 in 4 Americans will get cancer and 23.9% of Americans are Evangelical Christians who may Google some variation of “Jesus cure cancer” and stumble across his work? […]

Excellent point! The problem is that “Jesus” operates outside what is called “the medical standard of practice”; which means that if 100,000 MDs prescribe rat poison to babies, they will turn on peers who advocate breast milk. This deadly consensus enforces acquiescence (doing what everyone else does) and dissuades innovators from actually thinking about their patients.

Jesus doesn’t have a chance – and he’s be crucified for the same reasons that Pontius Pilate rationalized. I pray that our nation is forgiven our smug belief that we’re an advanced people – we’re as barbaric as we were 2000 years ago.

My husband had stage four lung cancer and he has been through chemo 3 times, but this time his condition was getting worse that I was afraid it will kill him. When a friend of mine directed me to Rick Simpson who helped me with my husband cancer and cure it completely, I want you to join hands in appreciation of the great work that is been done by Rick Simpson, he is the best that saved the life of my husband with hemp oil, thanks to him.

There’s little problem with anyone, even Jesus, curing cancer, because the books are cooked. No-one counts cancer cures. The statisticians do not have a definition for cancer cure, only a definition for Treatment Survival. If Jesus, or anyone else cures a cancer, there’s no box to check that says Cancer Cured. No bothers to count cancer cures, much less to actually validate them. If you have a cancer, and it is cured, you will be ignored, or worse. Thus, cancer cures become invisible.

Teen ,now of age, can seek alternative cure for forced radiation/ chemotherapy failure.
This is truly bizarre, that your body is owned by the state. I hope it’s not too late for this victim of these pharmaceutical predators.