A little-heard-from Jewish hot spot in Perth, Western Australia has recently succeeded in scoring a wad of cash to help fortify its gathering place.

In mid-2004 Perth Hebrew Congregation (PHC), situated in the North Perth suburb of Menora, came into the spotlight when it was daubed with grafitti that Jews referred to as "racist". Interestingly, those of Jewish background often claim not to be a race, but a religious community only.

After lobbying of local government figures and pandering to already-rich and powerful Perth Jews by MP for Stirling Michael Keenan, PHC’s Rabbi Dovid Freilich (pictured) aquired a $60,000 federal grant of taxpayer money "to help cover its security costs".

The grant follows the $100,000 already given by the Western Australian state government in late 2005 and the $50,000 raised through a communal appeal following the appearance of the graffiti.

Meanwhile, as self-interested politicians pander to rich Jews like the members of PHC, tens of thousands of destitute and homeless people live on the streets in the Perth metropolitan area.

Rabbi Freilich said a new security fence made of metal and brick is nearly completed. Previously, the synogogue was completely open, making it vulnerable to attack, he said.

"Before you could take your car and drive right up and attack the shul. Now you can't do that."

Freilich praised the state and federal governments for being "responsive" and "generous" to the synagogue’s security needs. Slogans such as "Jews out" and "Hitler was right" and swastikas were daubed across the synagogue ’s entrance.

Interestingly, Coogee Synagogue was vandalized last weekend, just days before a ceremony marking the completion of a $1-million renovation.

WASHINGTON - Pledging to follow the Lead of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, White House officials say the Bush administration will not pressure Israel into making any unilateral concessions to Palestinans.

White House chief of staff Joshua Bolton assured representatives of Judaism's Chabad-Lubavitch movement at meetings last week that President Bush would never force the Israelis to make territorial concessions to the Palestinians whose land occupy without requiring reciprocal concessions.

Lubavitch Representatives concluded a two-day commemoration of the twelfth anniversary of founder Rabbi Menachem Schneerson’s death with meetings Wednesday with Bolton and U.S. Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff. Both men are Jewish.

That Bolton and Chertoff welcomed representatives of the extremist sect and provided assurances of the White House's blessing speaks volumes about the extent of Zionist influence on the current administration.

Jewish supremacism in its rawest form, the Chabad movement remains unknown to most Americans. Prominent followers of the sect write unapologetically of the divinity of Jews, while non-Jews are regarded as mere tools for the realization of the Jewish people's destiny.

The ideas of Rabbi Schneerson (pictured) that appear below are taken from a book of his recorded messages to followers in Israel, published in 1965 under the title Gatherings of Conversations. During the subsequent three decades of his life, Schneerson remained consistent; he changed none of his opinions. Whatever he taught either was or immediately became official Lubavitch-Hassidic doctrine. Regarding the non-Jew the Rabbi's views were clear:

"The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world....

An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness....

A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" [Genesis 1:1] means that [the heavens and the earth] were created for the sake of the Jews, who are called the “beginning.” This means everything, all developments, all discoveries, the creation, including the “heavens and the earth - are vanity compared to the Jews. The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim. A
non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, “And the strangers shall stand and feed your flocks” [Isaiah 61: 5]. The entire creation exists only for the sake of the Jews..."

The St. Louis-born Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh, regarded as one of the Lubovitcher sect’s leading authorities on Jewish mysticism, speaks freely of Jews’ genetically-based spiritual superiority to non-Jews. It is a superiority that he asserts invests Jewish life with greater value in the eyes of the Torah.

“If you saw two people drowning, a Jew and a non-Jew, the Torah says you save the Jewish life first,” Ginsburgh told the Jewish Week, America's largest-circulation Jewish newspaper.

“If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA.”

Later, Ginsburgh asked rhetorically, “If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value,” he explained. “There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.”

Wednesday's commemoration was not the first time the Bush administration has honored this kind of thinking. In 2002, President Bush invited Lubavitcher rabbis to the White House for a special ceremony in which he signed a proclamation celebrating Schneerson's birthday.

The Bush-Cheney team has racked up another $3 trillion in debt in just 6 years. The US national debt now stands at $8.4 trillion dollars while the trade deficit has ballooned to $800 billion--nearly 7% of the GDP.

This is lunacy. No country, however powerful, can maintain these staggering numbers. The country is in hock up to its neck and has to borrow $2.5 billion per day just to stay above water. Presently, the Fed is expanding the money supply and buying back its own treasuries to hide the hemorrhaging from the public. Its utter madness.

Wouldn’t you like to know where Dick Cheney puts his money? Then you’d know whether his “deficits don’t matter” claim is just baloney or not.

Well, as it turns out, Kiplinger Magazine ran an article based on Cheney’s financial disclosure statement and, sure enough, found out that the VP is lying to the American people for the umpteenth time. Deficits do matter and Cheney has invested his money accordingly.

The article is called “Cheney’s betting on bad news” and provides an account of where Cheney has socked away more than $25 million. While the figures may be estimates, the investments are not. According to Tom Blackburn of the Palm Beach Post, Cheney has invested heavily in “a fund that specializes in short-term municipal bonds, a tax-exempt money market fund and an inflation protected securities fund. The first two hold up if interest rates rise with inflation. The third is protected against inflation.”

Cheney has dumped another (estimated) $10 to $25 million in a European bond fund which tells us that he is counting on a steadily weakening dollar. So, while working class Americans are loosing ground to inflation and rising energy costs, Darth Cheney will be enhancing his wealth in “Old Europe”. As Blackburn sagely notes, “Not all ‘bad news’ is bad for everybody.”

This should put to rest once and for all the foolish notion that the “Bush Economic Plan” is anything more than a scam aimed at looting the public till. The whole deal is intended to shift the nation's wealth from one class to another. It’s also clear that Bush-Cheney couldn’t have carried this off without the tacit approval of the thieves at the Federal Reserve who engineered the low-interest rate boondoggle to put the American people to sleep while they picked their pockets.

Reasonable people can dispute that Bush is “intentionally” skewering the dollar with his lavish tax cuts, but how does that explain Cheney’s portfolio?

It doesn’t. And, one thing we can say with metaphysical certainty is that the miserly Cheney would never plunk his money into an investment that wasn’t a sure thing. If Cheney is counting on the dollar tanking and interest rates going up, then that’s what’ll happen.

The Bush-Cheney team has racked up another $3 trillion in debt in just 6 years. The US national debt now stands at $8.4 trillion dollars while the trade deficit has ballooned to $800 billion--nearly 7% of the GDP.

This is lunacy. No country, however powerful, can maintain these staggering numbers. The country is in hock up to its neck and has to borrow $2.5 billion per day just to stay above water. Presently, the Fed is expanding the money supply and buying back its own treasuries to hide the hemorrhaging from the public. Its utter madness.

Last month the trade deficit climbed to $70 billion. More importantly, foreign central banks only purchased a meager $47 billion in treasuries to shore up our ravenous appetite for cheap junk from China.

Do the math! They're not investing in America anymore. They are decreasing their stockpiles of dollars. We’re sinking fast and Cheney and his pals are manning the lifeboats.

The American manufacturing sector has been hollowed out by cutthroat corporations who’ve abandoned their country to make a fast-buck in China or Mexico. The $3 trillion housing (equity) bubble is quickly loosing air while the anemic dollar continues to sag. All the signs indicate that the economy is slowing at the same time that energy prices continue to rise.

This is the onset of stagflation; the dreaded combo of a slowing economy and inflation.

Did Americans really think they'd be spared the same type of economic colonization that has been applied throughout the developing world under the rubric of "neoliberalism"?

Well, think again. The American economy is barrel-rolling towards earth and there are only enough parachutes for Cheney and the gang.

The country has lost 3 million jobs from outsourcing since Bush took office; more than 200,000 of those are the high-paying, high-tech jobs that are the life's-blood of every economy.

Consider this from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) June edition of Foreign Affairs, the Bible of globalists and plutocrats:

“Between 2000 and 2003 alone, foreign firms built 60,000 manufacturing plants in China. European chemical companies, Japanese carmakers, and US industrial conglomerates are all building factories in China to supply export markets around the world. Similarly, banks, insurance companies, professional-service firms, and IT companies are building R&D and service centers in India to support employees, customers, and production worldwide.” (“The Globally integrated Enterprise” Samuel Palmisano, Foreign Affairs page 130)

No job is safe. American elites and corporate tycoons are loading the boats and heading for foreign shores. The only thing they’re leaving behind is the insurmountable debt that will be shackled to our children into perpetuity and the carefully arranged levers of a modern police-surveillance state.

Take another look at Cheney’s investment strategy; it tells the whole ugly story. Interest rates are going up, the middle class is going down, and the poor dollar is headed for the dumpster. The country is not simply teetering on the brink of financial collapse; it is being thrust headfirst by the blackguards in office and their satraps at the Federal Reserve.

The Bush-Cheney team has racked up another $3 trillion in debt in just 6 years. The US national debt now stands at $8.4 trillion dollars while the trade deficit has ballooned to $800 billion--nearly 7% of the GDP.

This is lunacy. No country, however powerful, can maintain these staggering numbers. The country is in hock up to its neck and has to borrow $2.5 billion per day just to stay above water. Presently, the Fed is expanding the money supply and buying back its own treasuries to hide the hemorrhaging from the public. Its utter madness.

Last month the trade deficit climbed to $70 billion. More importantly, foreign central banks only purchased a meager $47 billion in treasuries to shore up our ravenous appetite for cheap junk from China.

Do the math! They're not investing in America anymore. They are decreasing their stockpiles of dollars. We’re sinking fast and Cheney and his pals are manning the lifeboats.

Take another look at Cheney’s investment strategy; it tells the whole ugly story. Interest rates are going up, the middle class is going down, and the poor dollar is headed for the dumpster. The country is not simply teetering on the brink of financial collapse; it is being thrust headfirst by the blackguards in office and their satraps at the Federal Reserve.

Why has anybody gone to such trouble to build a lie machine and then peddle such enormous lies to millions of us? What has anybody to gain by piling Western Civilization and our American Republic up on the rocks? Who wants to turn us into a race of brown, communized mongrels, with heads full of lies? WHO seeks to do such evil things, and for what evil purpose?

George Lincoln Rockwell, White Power p. 106

Crooked Captains
White Power - Chapter 4

Off the New England and Gulf Coasts of America, a century or so ago, there were murderous gangs called "ship wreckers". The gangs would set up false lights near real lighthouses, cunningly placed so that suspecting ships approaching the coast in the dark and in storms would be guided onto deadly reefs.

As soon as the ship was smashed, while the captain and crew were trying to survive the storm, these vultures would pounce on the helpless ship and rob it.

To protect themselves from exposure, the gang murdered every human being aboard. There was nothing complicated in shipwrecking. It was the oldest crime in the world - murder for what the other man had. The only difference was in the method of using false lighthouses.

Today, there is abroad in the world an enormous gang operating in almost every nation doing EXACTLY the same thing as the early ship-wreckers, except that the modern "ship-wreckers" have added a tremendous complexity of refinements, and instead of wrecking ships, they wreck whole nations.

They are called "Communists", or "Marxists". But basically, the leaders are out to ROB and murder productive people for loot, just as the ship-wreckers robbed those who had worked for the ship's cargo, and then killed them.

Their basic technique, in the end, just as with the ship wreckers, is always naked violence and murder.

But also, just as with the ship-wreckers, they cannot beat the honest productive people of the world by sheer force. They also need surprise and guile. That's where the chart forgery and the fake lighthouses come in.

The Red gang of ship-wreckers lure decent, honest and sincere people onto the deadly reefs of Marxist insanity with their fake lighthouses of "brotherhood", "peace", "love", "democracy", "equality". And then they rig all the charts available to show these fake lighthouses as the ONLY safe guides. Meanwhile, these robbers and forgers rig all our charts (the press) to show the real, safe channels, in which America sailed to greatness, as the most deadly and dangerous of all reefs.

Once our civilization has been wrecked, the Red gang plans to loot it, as they have looted every nation they seize.

[...]

None but the stubbornly blind and blindly stubborn can now fail to see that Western civilization cannot much longer survive the way it is being driven.

Unless, by some mighty, convulsive effort of intelligence and will, we can find a way to rise up in a veritably frenzy of energy and throw overboard the crooked captains, together with their phony charts and chart-forgers, our whole people will soon fall into the bloody hands of the Communist ship-wreckers. As has happened to dozens of other nations, we will be taken over in the name of liberation, and then the ship-wreckers will loot the wealth of the productive people, shoot all who protest or even appear to protest, and put the remainder to work in their slave-camp society.

To stop a gang of ship-wreckers a century ago, it was necessary first to IDENTIFY them, then to CATCH them, and finally to punish them and see that there were no more ship-wreckers. Precisely the same steps are necessary today, with the modern, worldwide form of shipwreckers - the Marxists. We've got to IDENTIFY them, before we can proceed with the other, more direct steps.

So let's take a penetrating look at these criminals, and see if we can learn who they are. Let's remember that no gang can be stopped as long as all you do is chase the peons and subleaders. We've got to find who is the "Mr. Big" behind this gang of international, Marxist ship-wreckers. And it's going to be a little dangerous.

Whenever you penetrate the inner circle of a gang and begin to put the finger on "Mr. Big", you can expect lots of heat and fire.

Are people -- let's be more specific -- are White Americans less intelligent today than they were a century ago?

An impartial observer -- someone from Mars, say -- might sample the sort of television entertainment that keeps most White Americans occupied in their leisure time these days and then compare that with the penny romances the masses read in 1900 for relaxation and conclude that the IQ level has indeed gone down a bit. He might take a look at the nonstop circus of the current presidential election, and he would be even more inclined to think that we aren't quite as smart as we used to be.

The real clincher for the Martian observer, however, would be an examination of the way American public policy, as manifested in our laws and our public behavior, has changed. I mean, we did some stupid things and had some really dumb habits in the latter half of the 19th century, but they were nothing compared to the inexcusable foolishness which characterizes our behavior today. In the 19th century we decided that slavery wasn't a good policy, and so we put an end to it, and that was a smart thing to do, because we never should let ourselves become dependent on another race. But then we just turned four million former Black slaves loose in our society. We didn't send them back to Africa or otherwise get rid of them. We didn't even sterilize them. We just turned them loose. That was a really stupid and irresponsible thing to do. But at least we didn't let them vote. There were a few criminally insane people in Washington who thought they should be permitted to vote and even managed to change our Constitution to that effect, but as a practical matter we didn't let our former slaves meddle in the business of choosing our legislators and judges and other public officials to any substantial degree. And of course, we didn't let Blacks get near our women. We had laws against miscegenation nearly everywhere, and the laws were enforced, either by the authorities or by our people.

Today we have more than 30 million Blacks running loose in our society, and we not only let them vote and copulate with our women, but we encourage them in this behavior. We have welfare programs that allow them to breed faster than we do. We give them food stamps and free medical care. We give those of them who are willing to work preferential treatment in hiring and promotion. We bus their children to the schools attended by our children. Our colleges and universities have special recruitment programs to entice more Blacks into becoming students, and we bend our admissions requirements to get them into college and lower our academic standards to keep them in.

In magazine advertisements, on television news programs, in professional sports, and in half the movies coming out of Hollywood, Blacks are held up as role models for our children and as objects of romantic fantasy for our women, and we don't even speak out against it. Black faces on our television screens advise us about our health, analyze the news of the day for us, and tell us how we should invest our money, and we act as if everything is as it should be. All of that is not only more stupid than anything we did in the 19th century, it's insane.

So are we dumber than we used to be? The Martian probably would think so, but I'm inclined to believe that it's not just a lower average intelligence that causes us to behave so stupidly today. What has happened is that the way White Americans are conditioned to think and behave has changed. Let us remember that most people don't think and behave the way they do, don't have the opinions and attitudes they do, as the result of any rational process. They don't examine the world around them, independently analyze the data, and then decide what attitude to have about what they have observed. Instead in nearly every case they let themselves be told what to think; they let themselves be told what their attitudes and opinions should be.

That's nothing new, of course. That's the way the bulk of the population always has been, in good times and in bad times. The really important thing in determining what most people think and how they behave is the sort of conditioning they receive. Children are conditioned in the home by their parents when they are small. Later they are conditioned by their playmates and then by their schools. As adults they are conditioned by the marketplace, the public square, the church, the village store. They absorb the attitudes and opinions of their peers and of their betters.

At least, that's the way it used to be in past centuries. The new element in this lifelong conditioning process is the influence of the mass media: first and foremost of television, but also the cinema, radio, magazines and newspapers and comic books and popular music. Well, I've talked before, more than once, about the role of the mass media in conditioning the public, in shaping their attitudes and opinions. I've talked about how the Jews infiltrated and then dominated and controlled the mass media of news and entertainment during the past century, and how they used their control of the media and of public opinion to transform our whole society in order to suit their own interests and schemes.

Today I want to talk with you about another element in the conditioning of our people which makes them behave in the self-destructive manner we see all around us. I want to talk with you about the role of the schools. It's not an independent role, of course. The way in which our schools, from kindergarten all the way up through the universities, condition our children and young people is determined by the way in which the teachers and professors themselves have been conditioned. And in a centralized, bureaucratic society such as we have in the United States today, there is a high degree of centralized control over the way in which schools condition students. It's not just the conditioning of the teachers and professors; it's also the program that they are required to follow, regardless of their own beliefs and attitudes.

Now I'll jump ahead a bit and tell you what the purpose of that program is; then I'll back up and fill in some of the details. To the extent that there is a single program governing public education in America today, a single purpose behind education in America, it is to condition White children and young people to accept without resistance a multicultural society, a multiracial society, in which they have no more important or dominant role than the descendants of their Black slaves, or mestizos who have recently come across the border from Mexico, or Hmong tribesmen fresh off the boat from Southeast Asia. And it also is to condition heterosexual White males to embrace a society in which the rules are as likely to be made by homosexuals or by women wearing trousers as by men, a society in which White men are neither expected nor permitted to protect White women, in which men no longer are the heads of their households or the decision-makers for their nation.

Now, I've tried to state the governing principle behind education in America today objectively, even though I know there are listeners who will think I've soft-pedaled it because they are familiar with many aspects of our present educational system which are blatantly anti-White or anti-male. In response to this objection I assert again that the governing principle is egalitarianism. It is not to put women above men or homosexuals above heterosexuals or Blacks above Whites, but rather to condition everyone into accepting a society in which neither race nor sex nor sexual orientation is important. That's the theory -- but because heterosexual White males have had the leading role in building and governing our society in the past, they are seen as the enemy by many of the egalitarian enthusiasts. They are seen as the people who have to be put down before we can have a truly egalitarian society.

Anyway, an egalitarian society is the ideal, and of course, that is absolutely crazy. It is nuts. It is suicidally insane.

The aim of our educational system is to produce citizens who have been conditioned to believe -- or to act as if they believe -- that men and women are interchangeable, essentially the same except for the configuration of their genitalia, and should be treated exactly the same by society and have similar roles. And this means suppressing the old belief that men and women are fundamentally different -- physically, intellectually, and emotionally -- that their natural roles in society and in the family are not the same but instead are complementary, and that they should be treated accordingly -- which means differently.

The aim of our educational system is to produce citizens who have been conditioned to believe -- or to act as if they believe -- that homosexuality is as natural a condition as heterosexuality, that homosexuality is in no way undesirable or reprehensible, that the only difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is in their choice of sexual partners, and that homosexuals and heterosexuals should be treated exactly the same by society.

And the aim of our educational system is to produce citizens who have been conditioned to believe -- or to act as if they believe -- that racial differences are the most unimportant, superficial, and inconsequential thing in the world; that the only real differences are in pigmentation; that Blacks and Whites and Australian Aborigines and Chinamen have the same way of viewing the world, the same intrinsic values and behavioral patterns, the same capacity for self-discipline, the same type and degree of intelligence, the same problem-solving ability, the same aptitude for building civilizations and maintaining them; and that to believe otherwise is not only wrong but sinful and shameful. In fact, the gravest possible sin, the most shameful possible error, is racism, and the severest means should be used to exorcise it and the severest penalties imposed to punish those who adhere to it.

That, I think, is a fair and objective statement of current American educational policy. I believe that even those who think it is a good policy will agree with my statement. But as you know, I do not think it is a good policy, and certainly a Martian observer can be excused for thinking that we are either stupid or crazy to have such a policy, because it will lead us to our extinction.

A minute ago I said that the theory of current American educational policy is egalitarianism; that the purpose is to produce Politically Correct citizens. Actually, that's a bit naïve. The people most responsible for the current policy, the people behind the scenes who use egalitarianism as a nation-destroying and a race-destroying weapon to serve their own ends are not egalitarians at all. They believe not only that they are superior to all the nations of the world -- to all the Gentiles of the world -- but also that they are more deserving. They believe that it is right and proper for them to deceive and demoralize the Gentiles, to destroy the Gentiles' sense of racial identity and racial pride, to feminize Gentile men and masculinize Gentile women, in order to make easier prey of the Gentiles.

And so they go beyond egalitarianism in the schools. They teach our children and our university students about their special status, about why they deserve more than others. "Holocaust" studies, they call it. It's already mandatory in the public schools of many states, and they're pushing hard to make it mandatory everywhere. The reason for requiring the teaching of the "Holocaust" story to Gentile children, they say, is to warn them what terrible things may happen if people are permitted to be racists or anti-Semites. The "Holocaust," they say, was the most terrible thing which ever has happened, and it was perpetrated by racists and anti-Semites.

Actually, that's not the reason for "Holocaust" studies at all. The "Holocaust" may be the worst thing that's happened to the Jews, but what the communists did to our people -- to Gentiles -- in Russia and Ukraine and Poland and the Baltic countries and Germany was far worse. The communists murdered at least 30 million of our people in those countries alone. The communist movement which committed those murders was inspired by the Jew Karl Marx and was heavily staffed by Jews. The death camp commissars in the Soviet Union during the 1920s and 1930s, the brutal commissars of the "gulag" about which Alexander Solzhenitsyn has written, were mostly Jews. Jews were vastly over-represented among the Soviet secret police and elsewhere in the Soviet bureaucracy. A Jew headed the murder squad that butchered the czar of Russia and his family. It was a Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, who supervised the murder of millions of Ukrainians. Jews headed the communist parties in many European countries outside of the Soviet Union in the time between the two world wars, and when they were given the opportunity they committed horrible atrocities against the populations of those countries, selectively murdering the best and the brightest people. That's what they did in the Baltic countries and in Poland, for example.

So if the aim is to teach children about the terrible things which can happen when the wrong sort of people acquire power, why not teach them about what the Jewish communists did? Why is there practically no teaching at all in the schools about these things?

Well, you already know the answer: it's because Jews weren't the victims but were to a large degree the perpetrators. It's because if the kiddies learn about what the Jews did to the peoples of eastern and central Europe before the Second World War, they might begin to think that it was quite reasonable for the Germans to want the Jews out of Germany, so that the Jews couldn't do in Germany what they had done elsewhere. That would put the so-called "Holocaust" in quite a different light, wouldn't it?

My point is that egalitarianism is the theory behind education in America today, but in fact the schools are used to a growing extent to brainwash students in whatever manner best serves the people who control the educational system. It's not just the Jews who are responsible for the conditioning going on in our schools. It's also feminists and homosexuals and egalitarians of all sorts. And just as they lie about the "Holocaust" -- just as they conceal the crimes of the communists -- in order to serve the purpose of the Jews, they also lie about other things to serve other purposes. They lie about the nature of homosexuality, for example, because that serves the purpose of the homosexuals. They lie about the differences between men and women, because that serves the purpose of the feminists.

And they lie about race because they do want to encourage more miscegenation, and they do want to deceive and disarm Whites who might otherwise put up a resistance to racial mixing and miscegenation. They tell the public school students that we're really all the same and that to think otherwise is wicked, and they try to convince university students that the concept of race is meaningless, that it has no scientific basis. They teach them that there has been so much genetic mixing among the races in the past that there is no such thing as a pure race today, and so the whole idea of trying to preserve one's race is pointless: just give up; it's too late.

Using the schools to condition as well as to educate is not new, of course. In the 19th century it was assumed that everyone in school was at least a nominal Christian, for example, and it also was assumed that it would be a good thing to condition everyone to be even more Christian in his beliefs. This was true in most of the universities as well as in the public schools. If you take a close look at the most widely used instructional materials -- at the McGuffey's Readers, for example -- you'll recognize these built-in assumptions. Christianity was not treated simply as one religion among many; it was treated as the religion.

In the first half of the 20th century, students were conditioned politically to believe that democracy was the best possible form of government, and that the United States was the ideal embodiment of democracy. American history and the functioning of the American political system were idealized for the students.

Now I personally am neither a Christian nor a democrat. But let me tell you, the Christian conditioning and the democratic conditioning of the past were nothing compared to the egalitarian-feminist-Jewish conditioning in today's schools. The old conditioning may not have been the sort of thing of which all of us would approve, but it was relatively harmless. Most of the people who formulated the old conditioning at least meant well. They weren't trying to destroy us. That cannot be said of the people behind today's conditioning. Today's conditioning is aimed at making Politically Correct lemmings out of everyone who passes through the schools: lemmings who will not question or oppose any of the policies of the conditioners, lemmings who will not put up a fight against those who deliberately are destroying our country, our civilization, and our race.

And the conditioning, unfortunately, is doing the job it was intended to do. It is recruiting a substantial portion of our young people in the universities today into the camp of our enemies and using them to help with the destruction of our race. More than a decade ago I gave a talk to a mostly White group of students at the University of Maryland. After the talk a pretty girl about 19 or 20 years old came up to me and asked me if I thought that the present conflict between the races might develop into a shooting war. I told her that if the government continued its policy of trying to forcefully integrate the races, I thought a race war likely. She told me, "Well, if the shooting starts I'll be with the Blacks shooting at you." And she looked really proud of herself when she told me that. She knew that she had said the Politically Correct thing.

A few days ago a computer vandal managed to break into the natvan.com web site which hosts my programs. He trashed the site, and he left a message saying that he had done it because the site encourages White supremacy. He spouted a lot of the pseudoscientific nonsense I mentioned a moment ago about there being no such thing as separate races -- the sort of nonsense the egalitarians are conditioning students with in the universities -- and he summarized it all with the statement:

No matter if you're black/white/asian/whatever, you are related to every other human on the face of the earth. This means, of course, that no race can be deemed 'superior' to another, as we are all a mixture of each other.

How's that for logic? Really, that is exactly the sort of fuzzy thinking which passes muster at our universities these days, so desperately eager are the egalitarians to support their insupportable position.

Well, it's going to be a long and bloody war, a very painful and destructive war. Meanwhile, it might behoove you to pay more attention to the sort of conditioning your kids are getting at school. Do whatever you have to do to make sure that they are on the right side of the war.

Did you notice a small news item a few weeks ago in some U.S. newspapers? Lucie Blackman, a 21-year-old English girl, disappeared in Tokyo. Her father, Tim Blackman, a very wealthy real-estate developer in Britain, was afraid that she had been kidnapped by one of the sex-slave rings that operate in Japan and taken to Hong Kong. Because Mr. Blackman is very rich, he was able to make a fuss in the newspapers and to offer a &#163;100,000 reward for information about his daughter. Otherwise Lucie would have been just one of the hundreds of attractive White girls who simply "disappear" every year while traveling in the Middle East or the Far East, and there wouldn't have been a peep in the media or any notice paid by government officials.

The fuss Mr. Blackman was making about his daughter galvanized the Japanese government, which didn't want any bad publicity to keep Western tourists away. Tokyo police began an investigation. They haven't found Lucie's body yet, but now they have a pretty good idea what happened to her -- and to a number of other White girls.

Lucie was a tall girl -- five feet, ten inches -- a slender, blue-eyed blonde, a beautiful White girl of the sort that the small, dark men of other races crave. And because of the craving Oriental men have for tall, blonde women, Lucie worked as a hostess in a private club for wealthy Japanese businessmen, Tokyo's Casablanca Club, where she was earning about $5000 a month. She was, in other words, working as a high-priced prostitute. There are many exclusive clubs for rich businessmen in Tokyo, all of them stocked with tall blondes, some earning even more than Lucie.

Japanese detectives traced Lucie to the luxury ocean side condominium of a Japanese tycoon, Joji Obara. She had been seen leaving the Casablanca Club with Obara in his red Ferrari. When police searched Obara's condominium they found a collection of videos he had made of himself performing various sex acts on more than 40 other White girls. The videos, according to police, were "horrific." Obara first drugged the girls and then sexually degraded them in ways too unpleasant to describe here. Obara is in custody, and police have been searching offshore for Lucie's remains but have not yet found them.

Now, what I am talking about with you today is not a crime story in the usual sense of the word, and it's not primarily about what members of other races are doing to our people; it is about what we have done to ourselves. Here's a question: Why do so many of our young women put themselves in the sort of jeopardy Lucie put herself in?

Of course, there's the money; there aren't many jobs which will pay a 21-year-old girl $5000 a month. But Lucie didn't really need the money since her father was a multimillionaire, although she may have thought that the allowance Daddy gave her was not enough to satisfy her craving for clothes, jewelry, and the like.

A more significant answer, I believe, is that our women do what Lucie did because we permit them to do it. As far as I have been able to determine, Blackman and his daughter had a close relationship. She was not alienated from her family. Blackman could have prevented his daughter from working as a "hostess" for Japanese businessmen, but he didn't. It would have been "sexist" for him to try to prevent his daughter from doing whatever she felt like doing, even selling herself to rich businessmen. And it would have been "racist" for him to tell her not to have sex with rich Japanese businessmen, in particular. As I mentioned last week, Brits are even more inclined to be Politically Correct than Americans are. They are more conformist, more authoritarian. When it is Politically Correct for a father to give his blessing to his daughter having sex with Asians or mestizos or Blacks, a right-thinking lemming father will do it.

You know, when Negro football player O.J. Simpson slashed the throats of his beautiful, blonde wife Nicole and her Jewish lover six years ago, my reaction was, "Good riddance!" White women who voluntarily have sex with non-Whites deserve to have their throats cut, all of them. And because Lucie willingly put herself at the disposal of Japanese men, it is hard to feel sorry for her when one of them turned out to be a pervert who murdered her. During the Simpson trial my opinion was that Nicole's father also deserved to have his throat cut because of the way he had raised his daughter. He had failed to teach her that she must never, under any circumstances, permit a non-White to touch her, and for that failure he deserved the severest punishment. And I could say the same thing about Mr. Blackman now, but I guess I really shouldn't.

And the reason I shouldn't is that lemmings simply aren't morally accountable. They have no true moral consciousness. They do not have the capacity to be either good or evil. They simply think and do whatever is fashionable at the moment, whatever they think is expected of them. Of course, that doesn't mean that some of them shouldn't be killed from time to time, but it's more a matter of herd management, of herd control, than punishment in the moral sense.

From the beginning of recorded history up until 30 or 40 years ago any father in a White society whose daughter copulated with non-Whites would lose everyone's respect; he would become a social outcast. A father's duty was to raise his daughters as well as his sons to have pride in themselves, in their family, in their community, in their race. In ancient times, if a White girl were caught with a Black or an Asian, then it was the father's responsibility to cut her throat. The Roman paterfamilias, for example, understood and accepted that responsibility.

Well, the American or the British father of today, typically a potbellied couch potato swilling his beer and watching his ball games while his children do whatever they please, has come a long way down from the paterfamilias, but I suppose it would not be entirely fair to blame him alone. The Roman father did what he did because that is what his society expected of him, demanded of him. The 21st century father does nothing, because his society expects nothing of him; in fact, it virtually prohibits him from doing anything. He has been emasculated and disempowered. He has become a sorry, impotent figure indeed.

Of course, the way in which we raise our daughters is just one symptom of the sickness of our society -- but it is an important symptom. We abdicate our family responsibilities; we let the Jews teach our daughters, primarily through advertising and television entertainment, that they should have no pride in their race, that there should be no constraints on their behavior, that they should do whatever they want to do, whatever their peers are seen doing on the television screen; and then we just dump them out into the multicultural jungle to fend for themselves, with no protection and no guidance. It is no wonder that so many of them follow the course of Nicole or Lucie. They see nothing wrong with it. They've never been taught what they should and shouldn't do -- except, of course, they have been taught by Hollywood and Madison Avenue that it is especially modern and commendable, especially cool, a sign of sophistication, to bed down with every piece of non-White subhumanity which comes strutting or shuffling down the sidewalk.

So if we want to improve the behavior of our daughters, if we want them to avoid the fate of Nicole and Lucie, we need to do more than preach to their fathers. We need to change the society which sets the standards for the behavior of fathers and imposes certain responsibilities on fathers and gives them the freedom to exercise those responsibilities. And we need to change the way in which our society treats our women.

Well, what we need to do and what we are able to do are very often far apart, of course, and that's the case with changing our society in such a way as to give us strong and proud and healthy families again which produce strong and proud and healthy sons and daughters instead of confused, rootless, alienated, and defenseless young people like Nicole and Lucie, who have no sense of identity and no racial pride, whose only aim is seeking pleasure and comfort, and who are at the mercy of every alien predator out there. We can't really change our society until we can change the directions in which the mass media are pushing it.

I'll talk about the media again in a moment, but first let's think about some of the changes we'd like to make in our society after we regain control of our media -- at least, about one change, and that's the role and nature of the family.

Many people believe that we're all much smarter today than we were a thousand years ago, because we can fly to the moon and we have cell phones and television. And they believe that because we're smarter we also have a better society, which has been made possible by our greater intelligence and all of our new gadgets. But I don't share that belief.

The gadgets we have today are the consequence of a recent technological revolution which has very deep roots in the past, and the people who are implementing that technological revolution today are not really smarter than the people who established those roots in the past. The bright and creative men who give us cell phones and all sorts of other microelectronic gadgetry today are standing on the shoulders of men at least as bright and creative who gave us our first understanding of electricity and electromagnetic fields and radiation hundreds of years ago: men such as Michael Faraday and James Clerk Maxwell.

And the men who designed the rockets and the spaceships which took us to the moon, men like Wernher von Braun, were standing on the shoulders of earlier geniuses, such as Isaac Newton. And so it goes, back to the ancient Greeks and earlier. Of course, we can't give IQ tests to the ancient Greeks, but if we could -- if we could take a thousand Greek teenagers from Athens and Sparta of 25 centuries ago and compare them with a thousand White American teenagers today -- I believe the Greeks would leave the Americans in their dust. In fact, I believe that intelligence and creativity have been going downhill since the Neolithic Revolution first made it possible for the less bright elements of society to be sheltered from the natural selective forces which used to keep us fit. And since the introduction of the modern welfare state in the last century, we have plummeted. Certainly, a very high percentage of today's couch potatoes would never live long enough to reproduce if the technological infrastructure which shelters and supports them were taken away.

So the ancients hadn't yet developed the tools with which to fly to the moon, but they did understand some things about families and other social structures and institutions. These were structures and institutions which had evolved over hundreds of thousands of years and adapted themselves very closely to our nature, our biological and psychological makeup. Every now and then a very bright leader might introduce some change, some improvement, but the changes were made slowly and very carefully, because no one wanted to mess up what Nature had spent so long developing and refining. No one wanted to mess up what worked and did the job it was intended to do, which was to keep the society, the tribe, the community, the nation, strong and healthy by producing strong and healthy young men and women to form each successive generation.

But we in our arrogance have made some very drastic changes in a big hurry, and we've made these changes without consideration for the consequences. That's why when I try to understand what's wrong with the society of today and the family of today and how we might improve them, I often look at older models. I look at what worked in the past, before we began making such reckless changes. I don't recommend that we try to model the American family of the 21st century on the Roman family of 23 or 24 centuries ago in detail. But I do think that we must keep in mind that, technological advances notwithstanding, the fundamental nature of our people hasn't really changed -- except that we're not quite as smart on the average as the Romans were. We need to keep in mind that the basic human qualities we have and that we must deal with, the Romans also had and dealt with -- and did it fairly successfully. The family must have a mother and a father living together with complementary roles. There must be a mother at home in charge of the children while the father is engaged in the task of supporting the family. And there must be a strong central authority vested in the father of the family. That much we must have again as a basic structure. Beyond that the family must mold and guide the children so that they grow up with the proper values. That task must not be left to the street, to the playmates, to the passing fashions of the day.

Well, that's a pretty skimpy outline without much detail. I don't like to build castles in the air. I don't like to make detailed plans until we have the means for implementing those plans. It's not realistic to plan the rebuilding of our society until we have the media which control public opinion in our own hands. I think it's good to look ahead, however, and plan things in rough outline, to think about where we want to go -- but our principal task now remains the recapture of our mass media.

And you know, sometimes I do see a glimmer of hope, a small sign that we're making a little progress in this task. I'll give you an example. A couple of years ago a professor from one of our major universities approached me and said that he'd like to write a book about my organization, the National Alliance, and its ideas and about me. I said okay, and so he spent a month working in my national headquarters here in West Virginia, and we talked a great deal, and he read many of the books I recommended to him and listened to many of my radio broadcasts, and then he spent a year writing his book.

He's Dr. Robert Griffin, and he's a professor in the Department of Education at the University of Vermont. His book is titled The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds: An Up-Close Portrait of White Nationalist William Pierce. It's not the book I would have written on that subject. There are a few things in the book which make me flinch and a few things which make me blush, but it is a fair book, an objective book. And more important it's a substantive book, a book with some real meat in it. It does a very good job of presenting the ideas which I talk about on these programs. And it presents them in a way which makes them very easy to assimilate. Robert Griffin is a good writer. He knows how to present ideas. Well, as an education professor, he ought to know how to present ideas clearly and simply. And he does. It's a good book, a well written book.

After he finished the book Professor Griffin and his literary agent began sending it to New York publishers. He already had had books published, and he thought he'd have no trouble finding a publisher for this one. Well, he was wrong. Dozens of major publishers read the book, told him it was a good book, but they couldn't publish it because it wouldn't sell. The public won't read it, they said. The public isn't interested in that sort of thing. The public will be offended by many things in the book. We have a formula for writing books on controversial subjects like this, they said. It's a formula for books which will sell. Your book doesn't fit the formula. So we're sorry, but we can't handle it for you. We would lose money if we published it.

Dr. Griffin spent a year trying to get his book published, but he always got the same answer. Finally last month, in desperation, he went to Barnes and Noble, the world's largest bookseller, and asked them to publish it on the Internet as an e-book, the way the best-selling novelist Stephen King had one of his books published a few months ago. And that's what they did, through their e-book division, MightyWords.com. Any Internet user can go to the MightyWords.com web site, pay eight dollars with his credit card, and download Dr. Griffin's book, all 424 pages of it. Then he either can make a printed copy of the book with his printer, or he can read it on his monitor.

Well here's what happened. On October 10 Barnes and Noble posted the book at the MightyWords.com site. Within a few days it moved onto the bestseller list. That's the list of Barnes and Noble's 25 best-selling e-books, based on sales figures for the previous two weeks. The list is updated every day. Last week Dr. Griffin's book moved to the top of the bestseller list. And that's where it has remained since then: the number-one best-selling e-book from the world's largest bookseller. And that's without any reviews in the New York Times, without any advertising or promotion, without any book-signing parties, without being offered in any book catalog. All that happened is that a few people ran across the listing of the book at the Barnes and Noble e-book site, decided to check it out, were fascinated by what they found in the book, and began telling their friends. And the word spread from reader to reader, like a wildfire. That is why Dr. Griffin's book about me jumped to the top of the bestseller list and stayed there.

What does that tell us? Does it tell us that New York publishers don't know what will sell? No, I think what it tells us is that New York publishers are a bunch of Politically Correct cowards. They are scared to death of publishing anything which will subject them to criticism from the You-know-whos. They are not only lacking in imagination, they are gutless.

This is interesting, because the book-publishing industry still has a certain degree of independence, theoretically. There are hundreds of book publishers in New York, and many of them are not owned or directly controlled by Jews. So one might think that an author could find a publisher for any book with a reasonable chance of making a profit. But it isn't so. Publishers self-censor themselves, avoiding publishing books which will bring the wrath of the Jews down on them. They pretend that they can publish anything they want, that they are free men. But they aren't. They know what they're not permitted to publish -- or at least what they're afraid to publish. The one thing which is strong enough to overcome their fear is greed, and I won't be surprised if when some of them see the amazing success of Dr. Griffin's book at MightyWords.com, their greed for profits overcomes their fear of the Jews.

Do you understand now why the Jews have been running around for the past year or two trying to build public support for censoring the Internet, why they've been complaining so loud about how dangerous it is to leave the Internet uncensored? All of the big Jewish hate groups, such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith and the SimonWiesenthalCenter have been working day and night to get the politicians to pass new legislation blocking anything they don't approve of from going on the Internet. So far they haven't succeeded. It's important that they never succeed. The success Dr. Griffin has had with his Politically Incorrect book should provide new hope for everyone who had assumed that the Jews had such a tight grip on the dissemination of information that it couldn't be broken. It can be broken. It will be broken. The true feelings of hundreds of thousands of concerned White Americans who have not had a voice will come out into the open. And the lemmings will notice.

HANOVER, Germany - A Lutheran church will be converted into a synagogue with a Jewish community center under a pending agreement between the church and the Foundation for Liberal Judaism. The Jewish group announced its intention Wednesday to acquire Gustav Adolf Church in Lower Saxony's capital city. The announcement marks the second time this year that a Jewish congregation in Germany has announced its intention to buy a Christian church.

In February the Jewish community in Bielefeld expressed its desire to buy Paul Gerhardt Church there. The Hanover Jews want to use Gustaf Adolf Church as a center for Jewish studies, culture, and "social dialogue," as well as a headquarters for the Union of Progressive Jews in Germany.

With nearly 550 members, Hanover's community of liberal Jews is the largest of the 21 Reformed Jewish congregations in Germany. Congregation chairperson Ingrid Berg said the facilities previously used by the congregation were no longer large enough to accommodate the influx of Jews from the states of the former Soviet Union.

Twenty years ago Hanover had no Jewish community. Jewish immigrants from Russia began to settle in the city in 1995 and their numbers are increasing.

Strapped for cash in a country where Christianity has been on the wane for decades, the Protestant Church has shown itself willing to sell its buildings to communities of outsiders who often express loathing for their faith.

The Lutheran congregation in Hanover wants € 350,000 for the 35-year old Gustav Adolf Church. After the sale, for which the church has already reached a preliminary agreement with the Jews, the Lutherans want to rent space in it for a kindergarten and a parsonage, says Pastor Sigrid Lampe-Densky.

The Jews have applied to the Lower Saxony state government for a €1 million subsidy to turn the church into a synagogue, and Berg says they are still awaiting a decision. In today's Germany, city and state governments usually subsidize the building of new synagogues, forcing German taxpayers to support congregations that hate them.

The transformation of Gustav Adolf Church into an organizational headquarters for liberal Jews would strengthen the synagogue's ties to the World Union for Progressive Judaism. International conferences could be held there, increasing opportunities for Lower Saxony, according to Katarina Seidler of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. Seidler did not explain what she meant by "opportunities."

Hanover's church leaders, who hardly dare entertain an unfavorable opinion of Jews no matter how much scorn the latter heap on their faith, say they are pleased that their building "will retain a religious function."

Rep. Tom Tancredo's new book, "In Mortal Danger," was the top-selling book in Los Angeles last week, where Americans are most aware of the extent of the illegal-alien crisis.

According to figures released by Bookscan, Tancredo's book ranked No. 1 in the nation's No. 2 market and No. 2 in the nation's top market – New York. It also ranked No. 3 in San Francisco, the nation's fifth largest book-buying market.

Tancredo is famous for his efforts to reform U.S. immigration policies and secure its borders.

In this book, the congressman addresses the question, "Could there be a time in the not-too-distant future when schoolchildren around the world will study about the rise and fall of the United States?"

Tancredo lays out the case that the hub of Western civilization, the United States, is on course to the dustbin of history. Like the great and mighty empires of the past – superpowers that once stretched from horizon to horizon – America is heading down the road to ruin unless we protect our borders, language and culture.

I received a telephone call this week from a woman I know in California. She's a member of my organization, the National Alliance, and she is using her computer and her web site to disseminate information about a problem I have spoken about with you on several occasions in the past, and that is the growing Jewish trade in White sex slaves. Organized Jewish crime gangs recruit young women in Russia, Ukraine, and other countries of Eastern Europe whose economies were ruined by decades under Jewish communism. The Jewish recruiters promise the young women high-paying employment in Israel as secretaries or receptionists, then force them to become prostitutes after they arrive. The government of Israel doesn't interfere.

The woman I know in California who is helping to publicize this terrible and growing White-slavery problem called to exchange information with me on recent developments, but she also shared with me her frustration over the difficulty of getting the public to pay attention and to become indignant. Even when they know what's going on, people are just too jaded, too passive, too lacking in self-confidence to stand up to the Jewish assault on our race, she lamented.

And, unfortunately, that's true of most of the public. I try to break through this public passivity with these broadcasts by choosing topics that should catch people's imagination and rouse their indignation -- although it's difficult for me to imagine anything more provocative than this Jewish exploitation of young White women.

One thing that many people respond to is anything which is blatantly unfair, anything which offends our people's inborn sense of fairness. I'll try that approach today. I'm sure you've all heard about the ongoing and very profitable campaign of the Jews to collect reparations from everyone in sight for their alleged sufferings during the Second World War, which ended more than 55 years ago. They've been cashing in big on the so-called "Holocaust." They've bribed politicians in half the state legislatures in America to pass laws requiring that all public school children take classes on the "Holocaust" and be taught about the unique "victim" status of the Jews, about how they have suffered more than anyone else and therefore deserve more in the way of compensation from the Gentile world. They tell us that their reason for harping on their "Holocaust" all the time is to prevent it from happening again. But really, the main reason is that they're making tons of money from it.

On previous programs I've talked with you about how they've parlayed their losses during the Second World War into a steady flow of gold into the pockets of Jews in Israel and around the world during the past half-century: scores of billions of dollars from Germany, from Switzerland, from France, from the Netherlands, from Britain. I've told you how the United States government acted as the Jews' bully boy, coercing other countries into coughing up whatever the Jews demanded: billions of dollars for dormant bank accounts in Switzerland, more than 60 billion dollars in reparations from Germany, hundreds of millions of dollars from France and the Netherlands for property the Jews claimed belonged to them before the war, then back to Germany last year with a claim for more billions of dollars for unpaid wages to Jews who say that they were forced to work in the German defense industry during the war. And finally billions of dollars in claims from the United States because many American companies were doing business in Germany before the war. The American media and the U.S. government have been behind the Jews all the way in the enforcement of these claims.

Well, you know, the Jews weren't the only ones who had losses during the Second World War. And the Germans weren't the only ones who forced prisoners to work. The biggest employer of forced labor by far was our gallant communist ally, the Soviet Union. The Japanese also forced many American prisoners of war to work.

When the Jews began demanding compensation last year from German companies for work the Jews were forced to do in Europe during the war, their Gentile step'n'fetchits in the California legislature hastily passed a new law allowing persons who had done forced labor to sue their former employers for wages. The California law clearly was intended to allow Jews to sue German companies and American companies with branches in Germany. Well, sir, a number of very insensitive American veterans from the Pacific theater of operations who had been forced to work in Japanese coal mines as prisoners during the war just didn't get it; they didn't understand that the law was intended to benefit Jews only, and that Gentiles need not apply. So they sued the Japanese companies who had used them as slave laborers more than 55 years ago. Among the defendant Japanese companies were Mitsubishi Corporation, Nippon Steel Corporation, and a number of the other largest Japanese companies.

As you can imagine, the powers that be were not happy about these uppity Gentiles trying to horn in on the Jews' private racket. I mean, really, if everyone starts demanding equal rights with the Jews, where will it end? The Jews will have no special privileges at all. Well, Madeleine Albright put a stop to the suit against the Japanese companies in a hurry. She has vigorously supported the efforts by her fellow Jews to extort reparations from everyone in sight, but she had her State Department tell the court in California that the suit by the veterans should be dismissed. And that's exactly what happened on Thursday of last week.

You can read about it yourself in the September 21 Associated Press report from San Francisco. The report begins, and I quote: "Surviving World War II prisoners of war who allege they were used as slave laborers by some of Japan's biggest corporations cannot seek compensation from the companies, a federal judge ruled Thursday." -- end quote -- Then the judge told the veterans, in effect, that they should be thankful they're still alive, and that should be enough for them. Now, I'll stick my neck out and make a little prediction here: when the Jews' lawsuits against American companies they claim made a profit from Jewish labor in Germany during the war come to court, the verdict will be different. The State Department will take the side of the Jews, and the Jews will get every cent they're demanding. And anyone who tells them that they should be thankful to still be alive and that should be enough for them will be torn to shreds by the media and condemned as a "hater" and an "anti-Semite." That's my prediction, because that's the way the system is rigged. What do you think?

But really, isn't that something? American veterans who were abused atrociously as prisoners of war by the Japanese can't get a cent from the Japanese. The Clinton government, acting through Madeleine Albright's State Department, takes the side of the Japanese. But when the Jews, who had never set foot in America until after the war, never served this country in any way, make claims against Americans, they'll get everything they demand, and they'll get it with the help of the U.S. government. It's good to remember that the veterans who last week were denied compensation from the Japanese for their slave labor were fighting for America in a war that, at the root, was a war to destroy the enemies of the Jews, a war to destroy Hitler and his government. In that war the American companies from which the Jews now are demanding compensation were indispensable to the American war effort, regardless of any profit they may have made from German subsidiaries. Without the participation of the Ford Motor Company, for example, and the other big American companies from which the Jews are demanding money now, America couldn't have won the war. America wouldn't have had any trucks or tanks or jeeps without Ford and General Motors, from whom the Jews are seeking blood money.

The Jews, in effect, are demanding money from us for saving their hides in the Second World War.And the men who fought to save their hides don't get anything but a kick in the teeth. Now, perhaps you believe that the Jews shouldn't be blamed for trying to take us to the cleaners, if we're stupid enough to let ourselves be taken to the cleaners. But what do you think about the attitude of our government? And what about the attitude of the mass media, which, in fact, is ultimately more important than that of the government? In the coming months the media will be full of stories about the poor, deserving Jews who are entitled to compensation from those wicked American companies which may have made a profit from their labor in Germany before or during the war, but I doubt that you'll be seeing much beyond that one Associated Press report I cited about the inability of American veterans who were slave laborers for the Japanese to collect compensation.

How does that strike your sense of fairness? I'll give you another example. In South Carolina there's an unreconstructed Southern businessman named Maurice Bessinger. Mr. Bessinger owns a chain of barbeque restaurants -- Piggie Parks -- and he manufactures his own brand of barbeque sauce, which until a few days ago was sold in more than 90 Wal-Mart stores in six Southern states. Then some Politically Correct busybody complained to Wal-Mart management that Bessinger displays the Confederate flag at his PiggiePark restaurants and demanded that Wal-Mart stop selling his barbeque sauce because his display of Confederate flags offended Blacks -- excuse me -- African-Americans. Well, of course, during the past few days Wal-Mart has been falling all over itself in its scramble to remove Bessinger's sauce from its shelves.

Why do you think that is? Do you think it's because Wal-Mart management believes it would be immoral to continue selling Bessinger's barbeque sauce? I'll guarantee that's not the reason. Wal-Mart couldn't care less about the political beliefs of its suppliers. The reason is that Wal-Mart is scared to death that the busybody who demanded it stop selling the sauce will go to the media with his complaint, and Wal-Mart knows what position the media will take on the matter. Wal-Mart is afraid that the media will stir up a boycott.

Now, suppose that I went to Wal-Mart with the complaint that some product Wal-Mart is selling is manufactured by a company owned by a Jew who has given money to Israel -- and believe me, there are thousands of such products on Wal-Mart's shelves, because most Jewish manufacturers have given money to Israel. An example of such a product is almost any video cassette with a Hollywood movie on it. Suppose I said in my complaint that Israel routinely tortures Palestinian prisoners, illegally stockpiles biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons, and is home to the largest sex-slave trade in the world, that it is immoral to sell products which provide money to Israel, and that I would go to the media with my complaint if Wal-Mart continued selling the Jewish product.

Well, of course, I'd be laughed out of Wal-Mart's administrative offices, because Wal-Mart knows that the media won't have anything negative to say about Wal-Mart's sale of products made by a Jewish supporter of Israel.

The point of my comments today is that it is not morality or justice which governs the world in which we live; it is power. Despite what you were taught in school, we don't live in a country governed by laws; we live in a country governed by men. The laws mean whatever the most powerful men say they mean, and they are enforced accordingly.

Many years ago I testified in Washington before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations when it was holding public hearings on the ratification of the so-called "Genocide Convention," which would require the United States to enact "speech crime" legislation similar to that in Canada and many European countries: that is, legislation which would criminalize any speech or writing which any identifiable racial, ethnic, or religious group might find offensive or threatening. While waiting to testify I spoke with another witness who also was waiting to testify. I found that he shared my views on many things, but whereas I intended to testify against ratification, he intended to testify in favor of the Genocide Convention. I was puzzled, and I asked him why.

In turn he asked me, "Have you ever seen the Talmud? It's full of hatred and offensive statements against Gentiles." I answered him, "Yes, I know that -- but so what?" "Don't you see?" he said: "The Genocide Convention will get all the rabbis locked up because of what's in their Talmud, and then the Jews will be out of business."

Well, I was left speechless by the man's astounding naivete. He really believed that "speech crime" laws would be applied evenhandedly, to Jews and Gentiles alike. I didn't even waste my breath trying to make him understand that the world doesn't work that way: that it doesn't matter half so much what laws are on the books as it does how those laws are interpreted and enforced by the men with the power to enforce them; that "speech crime" laws would be enforced against us but not against the Jews, as long as the Jews had the power of the media on their side. And the general public would never even be aware of the hypocrisy and injustice involved, because they wouldn't have a clue about the Talmud unless it were dramatized for them on television in soap operas, over and over and over again, until it finally sank in.

I've encountered the same sort of foolishness from well-meaning but very na&#239;ve men who have spent a great deal of time researching the law and have told me that such-and-such an amendment to the Constitution was never properly ratified and therefore is invalid. For example, I've had men tell me in all seriousness that the 16th Amendment, which in 1913 laid the basis for the Federal income tax, is invalid, and so none of us really have to pay income taxes. They believe that if they present the results of their legal research in court, the court will have to agree that they don't have to pay their income taxes. When I warned them that they were likely to end up in prison, they wanted to show me their legal research to prove that they were right. I told them that their legal research is entirely irrelevant. What is relevant is that the politicians -- including the judges in the Federal courts -- are dependent on the money collected from income taxes: income tax money keeps the public trough at which they feed full, and they aren't about to let any defect in the law empty their trough.We could argue with them about it, but in the end all that will matter is that they have more armed thugs at their disposal than we do.

I'm not saying that all laws are completely irrelevant, that it doesn't make any difference at all what the law says. The government still has to keep up a pretense of fairness and justice. The politicians themselves don't care about justice, and the system of which they are parts is thoroughly corrupt, but it is important to them to keep the public from realizing that. And the mass media are the key to what the public realizes and what it doesn't. If the average person doesn't see something on television -- repeatedly -- he won't be aware of it. And his powers of discrimination are such that it doesn't make any difference whether what he sees on television is true or false; if he sees it often enough he'll believe it. And if he doesn't see it on television he won't even be aware of it.

The media are the key to what the government can and cannot get away with. As long as we have a political system where the leaders of the government are chosen by a popular vote, the media will be the key to who gets elected and to how the government behaves. The media are the key to the behavior of the courts, the key to how a particular law will be interpreted and enforced, the key to the attitude of a Federal judge toward a claim for compensation for slave labor. The media are the key to the behavior of big business, such as Wal-Mart, and they are the key to the public's perception of and reaction to Israel's slave trade in White women.

We all wish that we had a moral government and a just court system, but as long as we don't it is power for which we must strive, not morality or justice. Only after we have power can we hope for morality or justice. And the key to power is neither guns nor money, but it is the ability to communicate effectively with the public, the ability to influence the public's perception of the world. If the key to power were simply money, then Bill Gates wouldn't have to be worried now about the Clinton government's effort to destroy Microsoft. Last year he should have taken some of the 90 billion or so dollars he had at that time and bought a couple of television networks. Then he could make those Jews in the Clinton Justice Department back off in a hurry.

Well, it's not quite that simple. You must not only buy a television network, you also must staff it properly and use it intelligently. There's not much point in buying CBS from Sumner Redstone, for example, if the same Jews at CBS will remain in charge of editing the news and designing the entertainment programming. You will have to find hundreds of talented and properly motivated people who are as good as the Jews are at shaping public perceptions, and then you will have to rebuild the whole network with these new people.

We can't do that now. We can't outshoot the government, and we can't outspend the Jews. But we can nevertheless continue building our ability to communicate with the public. Without a television network we can't influence the lemmings, but we can influence the two per cent or so of the public that is capable of independent thinking. And we are influencing more and more people in that two per cent. The National Alliance member I mentioned at the beginning of this broadcast, the woman in California who is using the Internet to help spread awareness of the Jewish trade in White women, is only one of thousands. I hear from dozens of new people every day, people I have never heard from previously, who have been awakened by the American Dissident Voices message or are in the process of being awakened.

If we want a moral government and a system of justice which is truly just -- if we want ever to have a healthy, White world again for our grandchildren and their grandchildren -- than we must have power, and for the time being the way to that power is to continue reaching and influencing the independent-minded two per cent of our people. We need more money, of course, and one of these days we may need more guns. But for now we need more moral individuals to wake up to their responsibility; we need more individuals with a sense of justice to use their intelligence and their talents to help us in our effort to communicate with our people. We need more people like that woman in California -- and we're getting them. Eventually we'll get the lemmings too.

The Secret War Against North Korea Report; Posted on: 2006-07-09 15:10:53

Bush, cronies systematically provoking impoverished nuclear state

by Michael Sheridan
and V-News staff

A program of covert action against nuclear and missile traffic to North Korea and Iran is to be intensified after last week’s missile tests by the North Korean government.

Intelligence agencies, navies and air forces from at least 13 nations are quietly co-operating in a “secret war” against Pyongyang and Tehran spearheaded by the globalist, Jewish-dominated Bush administration.

The program has so far involved interceptions of North Korean ships at sea, U.S. agents prowling the waterfronts in Taiwan, multinational naval and air surveillance missions out of Singapore, and a fleet of planes and ships eavesdropping on the “hermit kingdom” in the waters north of Japan.

Few details filter out from officials about the program, which has operated since 2003, or about the American financial sanctions that accompany it, but together they are antagonizing a nuclear state desperately trying to survive in an age of global bullying by the U.S. government.

In a telling example of the program’s success, two Bush administration officials indicated last year that it had blocked North Korea from obtaining equipment used to make missile propellant.

The administration also persuaded Red China to stop the sale of chemicals for North Korea’s nuclear weapons scientists, and a shipload of “precursor chemicals” for weapons was seized in Taiwan before it could reach a North Korean port.

According to John Bolton, the United States' Jewish ambassador to the United Nations and the man who originally devised the program, it has made a serious dent in North Korea’s revenues from ballistic missile sales.

But the success of Bolton’s brainchild, the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), whose aim is to keep states that reject U.S. control from obtaining nuclear weapons, might also push North Korea into extreme reactions.

There has been almost no public debate in the countries committed to the initiative, which was announced by President Bush in Cracow, Poland, on May 31, 2003. A congressional report said it had “no international secretariat, no offices in federal agencies established to support it, no database or reports of successes and failures, and no established funding.”

North Korea, together with Iraq and Iran, has been targeted for destruction by Jewish neocons in the Bush administration. Damned as an "axis of evil" by Jewish White House speechwriter David Frum, all three nations have been subjected to relentless pressure by the administration to bow the knee to U.S. directives.