Currently China is not superior to the United States...if you are saying Chinese are superior to whites as a race, that is subjective but mostly irrelavent.

China is modernizing quickly, but they are living a huge part of inland and southern China without education, work, proper living conditions etc.. China cannot be a modern country until that changes. China also needs to involve itself with world politics alittle more...sure they are "involved" I suppose, but they seem to be anti- everything and they are way to reluctant to cooperate within their own region.
Maybe the US needs China for trade, but China needs the US for shipping oil and keeping shipping lanes open. China might think that someday it can be self-sufficient, but this will never be possible (and i would love to see them try). China is more of a problem than a threat. The Taiwan and North Korean Crisis is basically all about China.

The Chinese military has great numbers, but they dont have real military power. They spend 12 billion on their military a year, the US spends 240 billion and Japan spends 40 billion. The truth is that China is experience rapid growth and a slow move into international politics. This could be a great thing for the world, or a dangerous one.

About Chinese history, I havent studied Chinese history outside of their connection to early Japan, but I know about the theory that they sailed to North America...who knows?
And for the retard who said that the chinese invented paper first but only used it for making paper lanterns...u have got to be kidding me. China an ancient written language that it still uses and plenty of written records that date way way back (the world's first novel was written by the Japanese however haha).
anyways, thats all.

Location: The Weary in spirit cannot withstand fate, and nothing comes of venting spleen; wherefore those eager for glory often hold some ache imprisoned in their hearts.

Posts: 6,183

Re: China is superior

Quote:

Originally Posted by frankgrimes17
About Chinese history, I havent studied Chinese history outside of their connection to early Japan, but I know about the theory that they sailed to North America...who knows?

The only book I have read on the subject of Chinese exploration is 1421, by Gavin Menzies. I believe he makes a convincing case for Chinese exploration of the west coast of the Americaĺs, and Australia, the rest of his work I find dubious. According to his theory the Chinese went everywhere in the world except, conveniently, Europe.

Personally I think what could have been an excellent study of Chinese exploration was spoiled by the chance to make a quick buck.

1: I dont care about your opinion that China is superior, I've debated this with other Asian supremacists (who were also white). I dont care about your opinion, or give it any credit because....

2: I live in Australia and every chinaman and his dog (?) is coming here.

3: The number of white people wanting to live in China is slim, virtually nil..

So, whatever way you cook the books, people want to live in a nation created by whites, not by the Chinese. People want to live in a nation with a better quality of life, which provides a better future for thier family. Nations founded upon Western philosophy, and with western science, medicine, politics and infrastructure.

Now, based upon the chioces of the many thousands of immigrants going in and out of China, which is the civilization of choice? People vote with their feet, and the masses have spoken.

I can't believe I have to point out something so basic, but then, we are talking to an anti-racist here.

With the world's largest economy, that's hardly surprising. It's essentially like being able to cheat when the world is governed by globalist standards.

I'm sorry, but the Chinese were never great astronomers, and these many other fields you speak of don't follow your logic either. Also, to say that China was ahead of Europe during the Dark Ages is the same as saying China will be better off than Europe now if Europe suffered a nuclear holocaust. Up to the end of the Roman Empire, Europe was the world capital of wealth, technology, and power. In fact, the world's largest Empire, that of Alexander the Great's, came out of Europe.

Also, I hope you understand what a hypothesis is, because it isn't a fact. You should also note that the Vikings landed in North America before that, and there are even a few loose records that the Phoenecians (though they were Semitic) were there long before either of the two, searching for tin in order to produce bronze. China also never sailed to Europe.

Actually the worlds largest empire by square miles was forged by the mongols.

The whole thing basically reminds me of a person or persons that have done all the hard work, and then somebody or bodies come along and do something a little extra and get all the credit. China has never outdone us in any way. The orientals are trying to imitate the western way of life. We are not trying to imitate them.

most countries in the world need china so they can make greater profits out of consumerism.

On the other hand.. china is amazing. They sailed the globe looking for culture and charting maps before any modern europeans, only to decide the rest of the world were barbarians so they came back and locked everyone else out.
Well they didn't class the native americans as barbarians as they had a sophisticated culture but they classed europe pretty much as third world

You're right, China is awesome. Now move there and spread the message to all the Backs Mexicans and Jews and get them to come with.

most countries in the world need china so they can make greater profits out of consumerism.

On the other hand.. china is amazing. They sailed the globe looking for culture and charting maps before any modern europeans, only to decide the rest of the world were barbarians so they came back and locked everyone else out.
Well they didn't class the native americans as barbarians as they had a sophisticated culture but they classed europe pretty much as third world

Thats only been the case over the last couple of decades perhaps. Prior to that this was not so . China was a communist hellhole run by a man as evil as Stalin, Mao. Things change so what is your point if regards to economics?

The Chinese as well as the Koreans and Japanese are worth while races no better or worse than whites IMO, just different. Of course I don't approve of any mass immigration of them either.

I am doubtful of your comments on the Injuns. Even the more sophisticated northwestern tribes were eons behind the Chinese in technology circa 1421.

Location: The Weary in spirit cannot withstand fate, and nothing comes of venting spleen; wherefore those eager for glory often hold some ache imprisoned in their hearts.

Posts: 6,183

Re: China is superior

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy Atkins
I am doubtful of your comments on the Injuns. Even the more sophisticated northwestern tribes were eons behind the Chinese in technology circa 1421.

In terms of technology the Chinese were ahead of the rest of the world before roughly the late 15th century. It is no exaggeration to say that China was on the brink of industrialising in the mid 15th century.

China, however, was a second rate scientific power compared to the Europeans and Arabs.

In terms of technology the Chinese were ahead of the rest of the world before roughly the late 15th century. It is no exaggeration to say that China was on the brink of industrialising in the mid 15th century.

China, however, was a second rate scientific power compared to the Europeans and Arabs.

My point was that unlike the negroes, Abos, Amerinds etc the far esterners are a worthy race of people, nothing more. They have their positives we have ours like you said.