"Art Now and Then" does not mean art occasionally. It means art NOW as opposed to art THEN. It means art in 2017 as compared to art many years ago...sometimes many, many, MANY years ago. It is an attempt to make that art relevant now, letting artists back then speak to us now in the hope that we may better understand them, and in so doing, better understand ourselves and the art produced today.

Click on photos to enlarge.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Divisionism

﻿

View of Montmartre, 1887, Maximilien Luce

Almost inherent in a definition of art is the word "new" spoken or unspoken. We use euphemisms for it like creative or original, but the meaning is the same. Trends, style, and art movements, in the past especially, came and went with the regularity of present day new car models. The phenomena became especially noticeable in the 1880s as artists (if not the public) grew tired and disillusioned with Impressionism. Renoir and Degas were among the first to break away, feeling stifled by the inherent limitations of the movement; while Cezanne rose to prominence among the art elite by quietly searching for something more solid than the airy lightness of en plein air Impressionism. A few die hards like Monet continued to cling to it but even his work began to take on many of the colorist, experimental characteristics of what has since come to be known as Divisionism.﻿

The Milliner, 1885, Paul Signac

Georges Seurat started it all in the early 1880s with his monumental Pointillistic studies of color, further enhanced and expounded upon by artists such as Maximilien Luce in his View of Montmartre, 1887 and by Paul Signac in paintings such as The Milliner, from 1885. Seurat died young. Signac didn't. He continued to work with Seurat's dots and other forms of the divided brush stroke for another fifty years. His glistening, luminous paintings picked up on several art trends to follow from Symbolism to Surrealism. Comparing The Milliner (right) from 1885 with his Portrait of Felix Feneon (below), dating from 1890, illustrates just how far he had come in only five years. His paintings, combined with his essay, D'Eugene Delacroix au Neo Impressionisme, gave concrete as well as theoretical expression to the study of color in painting that elevated Divisionism from a mere local curiosity to an international movement.

Portrait of Felis Feneon, 1890, Paul Signac

In Italy, for instance, a movement called Scapigliature combined Divisionism with figurative painting in a style blending with it elements of Rococo and Romantic painting. At the same time, Giovanni Segantini evolved his realistic painting style using color gradations into a kind of linear form of pointillism, wherein varying colors were meticulously laid in using parallel lines as thin as thread which corresponded to the composition of the painting rather than overriding it as did Pointillism. Italian artists such as Angelo Moribelli in his Feast Day at the Trivulzio Hospice in Milan painted in 1892, demonstrated that this form of Divisionism was no enemy of either realism or serious social content. Using Divisionist technique and color theory, he and others probed the social ills of rapid industrialization, neglect of the elderly, and the social institutions rising to meet these problems. Thus, the search for "newness" took its first breaths of life from Impressionism, but once the bonds with Academicism were broken, the artistic "birds" of the Post-Impressionist era were free to fly the Impressionist nest with no limits as to the heights they might reach.

No comments:

Post a Comment

NEW !

NOW AVAILABLE
FOR THE FIRST TIME...

Each chapter of Art THINK contains from four to twenty-one relatively short essays on different aspects of learning to think like an artist. Originally written for an artists' online discussion group, these "ArtyFacts" (as they were first called) can be bitten off, chewed, and digested in as little as fifteen minutes. Some items are light and fluffy-brain candy. Some are snack food for thought. Some are downright chewy. And, a few are (gulp) stick-in-your-throat fruit-cakey. They employ humor, irony, a gentle dose of art history, common sense, conventional wisdom, and good old school-of-hard-knocks experience.

Check out my VIDEO blog (click below)

COPYRIGHT NOTICE:

All text content is copyrighted, please do not use in any form without written permission. Most photos, except those by the author, are in the public domain unless the artist is still living or died after 1947.