Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

The Washington Post Used the Fake Sandy Hook to Argue Against Guns

I posted this at Business Insider where the Washington Post article appeared, arguing against guns:

Sandy Hook was a fraud. If you look at the pictures and videos of "parents" like Robbie Parker you will see no tears, method actiong, crying with no tears, no red eyes of real emotion. And if you go back and read the declassified Operation Northwoods, they were going to kill some people and have fake funerals for others.

Sandy Hook was fake, and no neighbors ever knew or saw Adam Lanza. Bloomberg has used it to start Everytown, chipping away at gun rights. Know this, Israel has strict gun control.

All you gun owners who support Israel and what we are doing in the middle east had better rethink your positions. The only reason the globalists let the Republican Party keep to pro gun is because the globalists have the Republican support for Israel, otherwise known in British Courts as the Rothschild project.

Bloomberg is a globalist and his agenda is clear; make the US like Israel.

Right wingers, wake up. If you gun owners support Israel, Pamela Geller, Judy Mozes and the rest, you are only strengthening the ultimate position against gun rights.

Lets be clear, the right wing globalists want you to hate, and Israel hates all Muslims. And the left wing globalists want you to have no guns, and Israelis have no guns unless they work in security or are in specified settlements!

Wake up America. Both parties are forcing the Zionist globalist agenda down your throats. (Zionism is a multiracial cabal worldwide, so Cheney and Biden are members, but is racist in Israel, very racist.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Join Talkmarkets for Financial Information. It is free! https://goo.gl/QZff5YI have written a lot of vetted articles that are exclusive** to Talkmarkets. Sorting a portion of them by subject will give the reader an opportunity to make sense of it all. I am adding a glossary of terms at the bottom of this page.For readers interested in economic subjects of the day, these top 30 themes are my efforts to make understanding economics easier:I have pinned the following article to the top because it is an insight into my personal life, as well as a commentary on isms. Capitalism is still the greatest system for creating wealth. However, it is often mixed, and mixturism is a factor in its success or failure:

There is further study in the articles I have cited for you at the end of this article. People must, must understand that Donald Trump is a divider of races and ethnicity, because at heart he is a fascist. Fascism seeks the purity of the races. Fascism is the opposite of what America stands for. Keep in mind that Donald Trump is highly influenced by Anarcho Capitalist, Murray Rothbard. This is an email I sent to an author online. It is slightly muddled, but overall quite accurate in its assessment of Libertarian Murray Rothbard:

Hi Steve,
I agree with your article on Rothbard, mostly. However, as a British court ruled, Zionism is not the essence of what it means to be Jewish. Therefore, I hate antiSemitism, and embrace antiZionism. I have both religious and non religious reasons for taking this stand. And the court absolves me of racism. After all my natural father was Jewish. And more and more Jews hate Zionism. And Zionism is quite multiracial at this point.
So, Trump actually is …

John Mauldin published an article regarding the economics of Donald Trump. I share many of his views. I think the article deserves to be discussed further.

It isn't as if John Mauldin is happy with the continual drive toward negative yields and the new normal. I believe he is like many, willing to fight for higher interest rates within reason and within the economic boundaries that exist. He is on board with the Fed, unlike other central banks, and is willing to risk recession to avoid negative rates:

Meanwhile, the Fed is in the middle of a long-overdue policy turn. There’s still a risk that they will find they started tightening just in time for a recession, which is also long overdue. I was convinced last summer that they would push rates negative in that scenario. Negative rates could yet happen, but I think they wi…