Keith Mitchell wrote:
> So long as the same policies for "PI" IPv6 space remain open to IXPs
> to use for their non-peering-mesh requirements in the same way some
> use their own LIR IPv4 space, then I am satisfied the proposed policy
> is a reasonable approac
Sorry - to clarify, I meant that I was happy provided IXPs were not prevented
from applying for sub-TLA IPv6 space on the basis of the same criteria as anyone
else.
Keith