The God of the Bible: Forcing out the Genocidal, Infanticidal, and Filicidal

We come to the other charges of an evolutionary biologist against the God of the Bible that He is genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal.

These shocking definitions come from Richard Dawkins who, until lately, is known as the most famous atheist. In recent debates with some clergy, Dawkins has described himself as an agnostic and “cannot disprove the existence of God,” prompting the religious to call on atheists to look for another leader. Dawkins, after all, is not a militant secularist although he would like the world to believe he is one. For all his mudslinging at the God of the Bible, he admittedly “cannot disprove the existence of God.”

Nevertheless, in coming up with a book where has earned a fortune and still is, Dawkins called God, among other descriptions, “genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal.”

Genocide is defined in the dictionary as murder of an entire ethnic group: the systematic killing of all the people from a national, ethnic, or religious group, or an attempt to do this.

Infanticide is defined as the act of killing infants or a newborn baby.

And filicide means killing of one’s own child.

The -al variations, of course, are adjectives. If God were genocidal, infanticidal, filicidal, that means he is capable of doing all these, has done them, is doing them, or tends to do them – along the terms that Dawkins understands.

But all these charges of Dawkins against the God of the Bible redounds to him bull's eye! In writing for Daily Mail of UK (www.dailymail.co.uk), George Pitcher on December 16, 2011, exposed the mind of Dawkins who asked another atheist, Christopher Hitchens, 'Do you ever worry that if we win and, so to speak, destroy Christianity, that vacuum would be filled by Islam?'

Hitchens is thoughtful about CS Lewis and Christianity and rather leaves Prof. Dawkins floundering in his wake, occasionally interjecting little assents to show that he's still there, as he struggles to keep up.

But one of these interjections is most revealing. About half-way through, the Prof gets this in edgeways: 'Do you ever worry that if we win and, so to speak, destroy Christianity, that vacuum would be filled by Islam?'

For background, very few of the major atheists have come into the open, declaring that their purpose is to destroy Christianity. Their intent is usually limited to simple criticism, open dialogue. But here comes Dawkins.

In an interview with Christopher Hitchens, Dawkins queries the late atheist whether he has considered a scenario wherein they win and destroy Christianity. Should that happen, would the vacuum be filled by Islam?

Dawkins denied later on that he said this but George Pitcher stands pat on what he wrote. The reporter of Daily Mail said Hitchens was an atheist while he lived but did not have “destroy Christianity” as an agenda.

So, Dawkin’s unfulfilled plan to destroy all Christianity is definitely genocidal! If the God of the Bible were genocidal, no atheist would be alive today!

As part of the comments on George Pitcher’s article, a reader from United Kingdom said the speech of Dawkins should be monitored closely. Imagine having a dream of destroying Christianity, calling religion as virus, and impressing that teaching children about God is child abuse.

This kind of speech should be monitored closely. To "destroy" people, to label religious views as a "virus" and to bring children up in Christianity as "child abuse" are all things he has said. This kind of talk would not be out of place in Nazi Germany. We have to be very careful.

King David, after experiencing cruelty and bitterness from his enemies with whom he had done no wrong, prayed that God may destroy them all.

PSALMS 109:4-5, 13

4 For my love they are my adversaries: but I give myself unto prayer.

5 And they have rewarded me evil for good, and hatred for my love.

13 Let his posterity be cut off; and in the generation following let their name be blotted out.

PSALMS 83:17

Let them be confounded and troubled forever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish:

Although David was a favored man of God, God did not hearken unto him! Why? Because He is not genocidal.

II PETER 3:9

The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

God ordering the annihilation of the Canaanites was not being genocidal. The order was an execution of judgment against a people or a nation of infanticides and filicides! This is about a race needing to be blotted out because of what they did to their children (child sacrifice, free sex, child prostitution, and the like). Their culture did not merit being preserved.

DEUTERONOMY 12:29-31

29 When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land;

30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou inquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise.

31 Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.

How can a God that abhors infanticide, Himself be infanticidal and filicidal? In truth, it is Dawkins who is infanticidal and certainly filicidal when he advised someone in twitter asking a hypothetical question to abort her child!

God would never agree to hurt an unborn fetus! Unlike Dawkins who arrogates to himself some authority as to who should live and who should die, here is what the God of the Bible says -

EXODUS 21:22-24

22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.

23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,

24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,

By God's law Richard Dawkins merits death for being genocidal, infanticidal, and filicidal!

Forgetting Richard Dawkins, let us discover from the Bible the gentleness and the loving kindness of the God of the Bible.

God takes care of a baby from conception to adulthood until death.

Before a baby is born, the mammary glands of the mother works in preparing all the necessary ingredients of life and the defenses for the baby's well-being. The breast of a feeding mother is nature-tuned for her to remember that her baby must be fed at the right moment.

An authority on breastfeeding, Kelly Bonyata, wrote on August 31, 2011 (http://kellymom.com) -

During pregnancy and the first few days postpartum, milk supply is hormonally driven – this is called the endocrine control system. Essentially, as long as the proper hormones are in place, mom will start making colostrum about halfway through pregnancy (Lactogenesis I) and her milk will increase in volume (Lactogenesis II) around 30-40 hours after birth.

According to her, earlier researchers observed that milk volume is typically greater in the morning hours and falls gradually as the day progresses. Quoting Hurgoiu (1985), she wrote that fat content tends to increase as the day progresses. These observations are consistent with current research where babies were found to normally have longer sleep at night and gradually decreases the amount of time between nursing as the day progresses.

ISAIAH 49:15

Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.

God is protecting each growing child by his injunctions to parents to care for their children. He placed those paternal instincts in their consciousness.

I TIMOTHY 5:8 (RSV)

If any one does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his own family, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

EPHESIANS 6:4

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

These laws are not only protective measures but penalties go with those uncaring and disobeying parents!

REVELATION 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

An uncaring parent is worse than an infidel or unbeliever, and infidels are destined to the lake of fire.
At the age of puberty, a virgin is placed under the protection of the father.

I CORINTHIANS 7:37 (RSV) Nevertheless he that standeth steadfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.

How can the God of the Bible that cares for a human being from conception until adulthood be infanticidal, filicidal, and genocidal?

Back to Dawkins, surely, he doesn't deserve to be a professor! He is a MONSTER!!!

Arguably, Dawkins is the most repulsive character around - not in fiction - but in the physical, spiritual, and mental reality!

55
comments:

Why God is not a Racist

The God whose existence Richard
Dawkins and atheists deny is the God of the Bible. Dawkin’s accusation
against this God is based on his misunderstanding of the scriptures! He charged
the Biblical God of being "homophobic" because this Biblical God does
not approve of the perverted sexual desire
and practices of homosexuals.

Homophobia is irrational fear or aversion
to or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals. God, being the
creator, is also the creator of homosexuals
and has no reason to fear or discriminate against what he created. As explained
in earlier posts, it is what homosexuals can do (activating their orientation) that
is abominable to God.

For one to charge another as homophobic
carries the inherent implication that one is a supporter, an adherent, a
partisan, an advocator, a backer, a proponent, an exponent of licentiousness that
some homosexuals engage in. It is safe to say Dawkins agrees with abominable and dangerous sexual perversion that
science says is quite unsafe. The Bible warns -

LEVITICUS 18:22

Thou shalt not lie
with mankind, as with womankind: it is
abomination.

Dawkins was indeed selective with whom to bushwhack while there are within the
sphere of human religiosity, many "gods"!

GALATIANS 4:8

Howbeit
then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no
gods.

This crusading idol of atheists did not attack nor charge Buddha, the god of
the Buddhists. He did not attack rats, the
gods of some Indians, simply because rats can be seen
and are hardly god to him. These rats mate with
their mother or father, and they could be the
ancestors of Evolutionist Dawkins and his peers.

One of the most disgusting and stupid accusations of
Dawkins against the God of the Bible is that He is
a racist. A racist would believe that a particular race is superior to another.

IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE A RACIST?

The Biblical God as we have discussed
in an earlier blog is a God who does not
practice favoritism or "is not a respecter of persons."

THE ACTS 10:34-35

34
Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

35
But in every nation he that feareth him,
and worketh righteousness, is accepted
with him.

How
can a God, who is not a respecter of persons, be a respecter of race or a racist? Even before humanity came to the point
of being divided into different races, God showed Abraham His loving kindness
to all races that would be.

GENESIS 12:3 (DOUAY-RHEIMS
VERSION)

I
will bless them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee, and IN THEE shall all the kindreds of the earth
be blessed.

How
can a God, who is willing to bless all kindreds of
earth, be racist? This pronouncement of God
to Abraham came
with a promise even before there were races.

ISAIAH 66:8

Who
hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to
bring forth in one day? or shall a
nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth
her children.

What the God of the Bible wants to do is to bless races
as He blessed Abraham. If there be any curse that befalls
a race or a nation it is not God's desire but a measure of justice to wayward
nations like those in Canaan at the time of
the exodus! This necessary and fair act of the God of the Bible to maintain
world order can hardly be understood by atheists and the
likes of Richard Dawkins.

ISAIAH 60:12

For the nation and kingdom
that will not serve thee shall perish;
yea, those nations shall be utterly
wasted.

There
is only one point in the Bible wherein God can be considered racist! This is where He loves the human race more than the angels. By that,
He becomes racist – in the true sense - but again as with a managerial God, He
has order. Among the human race however, the playing field is level: they who
do not form or conform into his image lose their right to be a race worth
preserving.

HEBREWS 2:16 (RSV)

For surely it is not with
angels that he is concerned but with the descendants of Abraham.

God
loves humans more than anything in His creation!

HEBREWS 2:6-7

6
But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that thou art
mindful of him? or the son of man, that thou visitest him?

7
Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory
and honor, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:

JUSTICE MUST PREVAIL

The Bible calls the Israelites as "God's chosen people.” Chosen, why and for what? Certainly not
because God is racist! The Israelites
were chosen for them to be the forefathers of the "seed.” Notice that seed
is singular, and it refers to Christ.

GALATIANS 3:16

Now
to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as
of many; but as of one, And to thy seed,
which is Christ.

THE
ROMANS 9:4-5

4
Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants,
and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;

5
Whose are the fathers, and of whom as
concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed forever.
Amen.

The
chosen "seed" coming from the race of Abraham will be the savior of
all other races on earth!

THE ACTS 2:39

For
the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God
shall call.

As flashback, Israelites were said to be
God’s people. There was the intention of God to make them be, but as history
reveals, Israel failed with all their idolatry and sinfulness. The
iniquities of the Israelites reached the pinnacle of His patience and leniency
that He took from them His kingdom and promised to establish it among the very
people whom the Israelites hated most – the Gentiles. This emphasizes that God is not a racist, but a God of justice, founded
on reasons and equity.

Remember that Israel was most favored by
God at that time they were commanded to drive away the wayward Canaanites.
Next, it was their turn to be deprived of blessings because of their
hard-heartedness. This is a prophecy being fulfilled for the end times – and
that is today – whether you believe it or not.

MATTHEW 21:43

Therefore
say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall
be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

THE ROMANS 11:25

For
I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye
should be wise in your own conceits; that
blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles be
come in.

MALACHI 1:11

For
from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles;
and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering:
for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith the LORD of hosts.

ISAIAH 65:1

I
am sought of them that asked not for me; I
am found of them that sought me not: I said, Behold me, behold me, unto a nation that was not called by my
name.

A racist would disregard
justice. God, however, practices justice which practice reverberates
deep within the heart of an intelligent being like a human made from the
likeness and image of
his Creator GOD! But certainly not in humans who
are descendants of beasts like Darwin.

Let us consider these
scientific findings.

Nature works within the human race. Naturally nature
works with a common pattern for humans. Humans with short stature bear
offspring of short stature too. But nature has extra-curricular activities!

A dwarf is a short-statured
person whose adult height is 4 feet 10 inches or under. Dwarfism can be caused
by any one of more than 300 conditions, most of which are genetic and present
at birth (http://kidshealth.org).

Disturbed
by a variety of factors in the environment, the work of nature can be
unnatural. A misbehaving immune system maybe the cause of autoimmune diseases.

An autoimmune disorder occurs when the body’s immune
system attacks and destroys healthy body tissue by mistake.

..When you have an autoimmune disorder, your immune
system does not distinguish between healthy tissue and antigens. As a result,
the body sets off a reaction that destroys normal tissues.

The exact cause of autoimmune disorders is unknown. One
theory is that some microorganisms (such as bacteria or viruses) or drugs may
trigger changes that confuse the immune system. This may happen more often in
people who have genes that make them more prone to autoimmune disorders. (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000816.htm)

What is wonderful to know is that God's pronouncement or
words in the Bible can over-power the workings of nature!

We
can understand that this statute intends to conserve and preserve each
particular species of animals and plants. Studies show that crossbreeding
produce undesirable results, like genetically modified organisms, thus, proving
again the scientificity of God's pronouncements in the Bible.

Big Cat Rescue is an organization that makes a pitch against crossbreeding
animals. It asks a critical question and answers it: “Where do Ligers come from? Irresponsible breeders is the short
answer.” Here is its more detailed explanation -

A liger is the result of breeding a male lion to a
tigress. A tigon is the result of breeding a male tiger to a lioness. Since
lions and tigers do not exist in the same areas, this is not something that
happens in the wild. It is done in captivity by disreputable carnies to produce
a freak that ignorant people will pay to see. These cats suffer from many birth defects and usually die young.
Because ligers are usually larger than either parent, it also puts the tigress
at great risk in carrying the young and may require C-section deliveries or
kill her in the process.
When the public quits paying to see these unfortunate creatures, the evil
people responsible for breeding them will stop this inhumane practice.

In the campaign of Bigcatrescue.org, it warns the public of the
evil motives behind this crossbreeding. It says –

…Anyone who cares
about animals knows that this is a despicable thing to do because the cats have
to spend their lives in deprivation and confinement and are genetically so
unhealthy that they usually die young. The only reason anyone breeds ligers is
to create a freak that simple-minded people will pay to see.

This
organization that is bent on conserving lions and tigers in their natural state
posted a story written by Maryann Mott dated August 5, 2005. The title is, “Ligers Make a ‘Dynamite’ Leap
Into the Limelight.” The obvious motive however is to justify the need to crossbreed,
hence the novel products - ligers and tigons. According to Bigcatrescue.org,
this story “attempts to make it sound like there could be some reason to breed
lions and tigers for public amusement.”

Ligers and Tigons

It’s
half lion, half tiger, and completely real. Now thanks to a cameo in the 2004
cult movie Napoleon Dynamite, the liger has leaped into the limelight,
prompting fans to ask, what are they really like?

The
faintly striped, shaggy-maned creatures are the offspring of male lions and
female tigers, which gives them the ability to both roar like lions and chuff
like tigers - a supposedly affectionate sound that falls somewhere between a
purr and a raspberry.

Weighing
in at about a thousand pounds (450 kilograms) each, they typically devour 50
pounds (23 kilograms) of raw meat in a meal.

“For
the most part they’re really laid back,” said Jason Hutcherson, vice president
of Wild Animal Safari in Pine Mountain , Georgia. “They like to swim and play
in the water.”

The
drive-through wildlife park is believed to have the country’s largest
concentration of ligers, housing ten of the massive cats.

Since
1999 the park has bred its male lion and female tiger many times, producing
about 24 cubs.

Not all of them have
been healthy, though. We’ve had 3 out of 24 that, for all practical purposes,
were normal but developed as they grew older some kind of neurological
disorder,” Hutcherson said.

Autopsies
didn’t reveal what caused the cubs to develop “head shakes,” so park staff
“chalked it up to a genetic defect,” Hutcherson said.

Accredited
zoos frown on the practice of mixing two different species and have never bred
ligers, says Jane Ballentine, a spokesperson for the American Zoo and Aquarium
Association, based in Silver Spring , Maryland. “Keeping the two species
separate has always been standard procedure,” she said.

The story went on and on and one gets the feeling that the
author is trying its best to be balanced, mentioning what health authorities
said about these new breeds, but at the same time was gushing over such
creatures of interest.

Back to (heterosexual) mating, one thing is certain,
God never prohibited the mating of a black
to a white race, or to a red race, or to a yellow race, for Him to be a racist.
The example of Moses marrying an Ethiopian woman
clearly did not elicit disapproval from God.

NUMBERS 12:1-8

1 And
Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had
married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.

2
And they said, Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not spoken
also by us? And the LORD heard it.

3
(Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of
the earth.)

4
And the LORD spoke suddenly unto Moses, and unto Aaron, and unto Miriam, Come
out ye three unto the tabernacle of the congregation. And they three came out.

5
And the LORD came down in the pillar of the cloud, and stood in the door of the
tabernacle, and called Aaron and Miriam: and they both came forth.

6
And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the LORD
will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a
dream.

7
My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.

8
With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark
speeches; and the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore then were
ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?

God approved of Moses
marrying an Ethiopian or a black woman. He who
created mankind is not a racist. In sum, it is still God who gives the standard
of what is right and what is wrong with his creation – not just anyone
especially Dawkins who dares to measure God although believing that he had
descended from animals.

More
to follow.

53
comments:

Dangers of Oral and Anal Sex that God Warned About

Homophobia
is defined as unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals
and homosexuality. In turn, a homosexual is a person who is sexually
attracted to people of his own sex. Therefore, if God is homophobic,
he fears homosexuals or is antipathetic toward homosexuals. That is
as far as Richard Dawkins, the author, sees God.

Is
God homophobic?

To
begin with, Dawkins proposes to be a militant atheist, but he
quibbles between believing in the existence of God or not at all. In
an interview with The
Telegraph,
February 24, 2012, he said -

I can't
be sure God does not exist... On a scale of seven, where one means I
know he exists, and seven I know he doesn't, I call myself a six...
That doesn't mean I'm absolutely confident, that I absolutely know,
because I don't.

Two
years later, in an article written for The
Telegraph
dated 24 May 2014 by Science
Correspondent

Sarah
Knapton, Dawkins was quoted as saying -

I would
describe myself as a secular Christian in the same sense as secular
Jews have a feeling for nostalgia and ceremonies… I am a secular
Christian, if you want to call me that.

Dawkins
is therefore not an atheist in the true sense but at best, an
agnostic, albeit a licentious one. By definition, he is one who
believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or
nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena. In effect, he
doesn’t claim faith or disbelief in God. Being that, Dawkins took
the liberty of maliciously piling adjectives about God in his book,
The God Delusion.

There
is no logic in the accusation of Dawkins that God is homophobic
for the reason that God
is not a respecter of persons. Here’s
what the Bible says -

THE ROMANS 2:11

For there is no respect
of persons with God.

It is not because you are a
real man or a real woman that you are counted "special" in
His sight. Why? Because He created all men.

EXODUS 4:11

And the LORD said unto him,
Who
hath made man's mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the
seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?

THE ACTS 17:26

And hath
made
of one blood all
nations of men
for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the
times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

I CHRONICLES 29:11

Thine, O LORD, is the
greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the
majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in
the earth is thine;
thine is the kingdom, O LORD, and thou art exalted as head above all.

REVELATION 4:11

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to
receive glory and honor and power: for
thou hast created all things,
and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

What
Dawkins does not understand is, that man
is part
of God's creation whether he is straight
or
homosexual.
How can a God who created all men and is not a respecter of persons
be
homophobic?
Since
He doesn’t practice favoritism in His creation, how
can He be
homophobic?
In fact, God wants all men to be saved.

I TIMOTHY 2:4

Who will
have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge
of the truth.

The
most loving and compassionate Creator is offering everyone including
homosexuals salvation.

THE ACTS 10:34-35

34 Then Peter opened his
mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God
is no respecter of persons:

35 But in every nation he
that feareth him,
and
worketh righteousness,
is
accepted with him.

God accepts everyone that
doeth righteousness. He
is not partial to homos.
There is the distinction that what
is sinful is homosexual behavior but not same-sex orientation.
If one has an orientation toward something, he doesn’t have to
translate that orientation into activity.
That orientation is not sinful, but the activity is.

It is the act of
unrighteousness that God dislikes
among homosexuals and every other man! Any
sinful act is offensive to God.
But if
homosexuals
refrain
from unrighteousness, they can
be
sanctified to merit salvation.

I CORINTHIANS 6:9-11(ESV)

9 Do you not know that the
unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor
men who practice homosexuality,

11 And
such were some of you.
But you were washed, you
were sanctified,
you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the
Spirit of our God.

Accusing
God who sanctifies homosexuals to be homophobic is most certainly
unfair!
It is just as irresponsible as the tweets of Richard Dawkins on
ranking rape and pedophilia as mild and violent – as if they were
something to be condoned if “mild” only. Dawkins excuses himself
that he doesn’t endorse either, so for what purpose is the ranking?

Surprise
of surprises, Dawkin’s prurient interests manifest in his
representing homos. He who affords himself the oxymoron of being
“secular Christian” is one with a very loose tongue. What does
research say about homosexuality and what happens when orientation
translates into activity? Isn’t Dawkins endorsing them by way of
calling God homophobic?

Now
let us look deeper into the rationale
that God set on His holy book hated by unbelievers.

ENGLISH STANDARD VERSION

LEVITICUS 18:22

You shall not lie with a
male as with a woman;
it is an abomination.

What
are the scientific considerations that authenticate the scientificity
of this
biblical injunction? The
possibilities of a
man lying
with
another
man or
a woman with another woman
is through
anal and oral sex.

On
its website, the National Health Service (NHS) of England
(www.nhs.uk)
discusses the health risks of anal sex as one of common health
questions. Accordingly, anal
sex is any type of sexual activity that involves the anal area
(bottom). This includes: (1)
Penetrating
the anus with a penis, (2)
Penetrating
the anus with fingers or sex toys, such as vibrators, (3)
Oral
sex (stimulating the anus using the mouth or tongue, also known as
rimming). It
explains that anal sex can spread STIs and why -

What
are the main risks of anal sex?

Penetrative
anal sex has a higher risk of spreading STIs than many other types of
sexual activity. This is because the lining of the anus is thin and
can easily be damaged, which makes it more vulnerable to infection.

Further,
NHS said STIs that can be passed on through anal sex include: (1)
Chlamydia,
(2) Genital
herpes,
(3) Genital
warts,
(4) Gonorrhea,
(5) Hepatitis
B,
(6) HIV,
and (7) Syphilis.
Some infections caused by bacteria or viruses can be passed on
through oral–anal sex, such as hepatitis
A
or E. coli. It's also possible to pass on an STI by
inserting a finger into someone’s anus.

Another
organization (www.avert.org)
called AVERT also cautions people about the dangers of oral sex or
oral stimulation of the genitals. An international HIV and AIDS
charity, based in the UK, it is working to avert HIV
and AIDS worldwide,
through education, treatment and care. It mentions the same risks
that NHS wrote but goes more detailed. On oral sex, it says -

(1) The most common STD
transmitted via oral sex is herpes. There are two main types of
herpes simplex virus (HSV): HSV type 1, which usually causes cold
sores around the mouth, and HSV type 2, which generally causes sores
around the genitals. If a person has HSV type 1 and they give oral
sex to another person, the herpes could be transmitted to the genital
area of the other person, causing genital sores. This process can
also work in reverse, with HSV-2 transmitting from the genitals to
the mouth of the other person during oral sex, though this is rare.

(2) Gonorrhea can easily be
transmitted via oral sex. The infection is usually passed from
infected genitals to a person's throat, but can also be passed from
an infected throat to a person's genitals. The body will almost
always naturally clear the throat of the bacteria that cause
gonorrhea within three months, although infections in the genital
tract will usually require antibiotics to cure.

(3) Syphilis is easily
transmitted during oral sex if a person’s mouth comes into contact
with an open sore or a skin rash caused by the infection.

(4) It is possible (but
thought to be not very common) for the human papillomavirus, which
causes genital warts, to be transmitted through oral sex.

(5) Chlamydia can infect the
throat via oral sex, although this is thought to be uncommon. People
with chlamydia may not have any symptoms and may not be aware they
are infected.

(6) The hepatitis A virus is
found in human feces, and may be passed on during anal-oral sex.

(7) Hepatitis B is contained
in sexual fluids and blood and may be transmitted during oral sex in
a similar way to HIV.

(8) Hepatitis C is generally
only contained in blood, and will only be transmitted if there is
blood present during oral sex.

(8) Gastrointestinal
infections and parasites may be passed on during oral contact with
the anus.

While
homosexual relationship can be disastrous,
heterosexual
relationship (between
man and wife)
is certainly profitable for both. Here’s
an excerpt from Dr. David E. Bratt’s “Nothing like Kissing,”
posted on The
Trinidad Guardian
dated April 13, 2004.

Among
other things, pain relief is explained as the activity releasing
pain-reducing hormones that help reduce or block back and leg pain,
as well as pain from menstrual cramps, arthritis and headaches. On
stress relief, sex is said to trigger release of its natural
feel-good chemicals, thus easing stress and boost pleasure, calm and
self-esteem. Sex and orgasms are also said to result in increased
levels of the hormone oxytocin that helps one feel bonded to the
partner, and better experience empathic connections.

Other
than the reasons
mentioned above, sexual relationship between a man and his wife under
God's laws and directives is God's way of procreation.

GENESIS 1:27-28

27 So God created man in
his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female
created he them.

28 And God blessed them,
and God said unto them, Be
fruitful, and multiply,
and replenish the earth,

MALACHI 2:15

And did not he make one?
Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he
might seek a godly
seed.
Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously
against the wife of his youth.

Had
all humanity followed this directive, there should not
have been
born on earth licentious
people!
All couples would
be producing
godly seed!

Let
us make
sure that
the next generation of men will not be agnostics,
atheists, hypersexual,
libertines
by heeding to God's counsel!

HEBREWS 13:4

Marriage is honorable in
all, and the bed undefiled:
but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.