Calling the Second Amendment "obsolete," the Communist Party USA announced through its publication that it supports Obama's attempt to limit the right to keep and bear arms, Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit reported Thursday.

According to the People's World, the CPUSA mouthpiece, "the ability to live free from the fear or threat of gun violence is a fundamental democratic right" that it says supersedes what it called "any so-called personal gun rights allegedly contained in the Second Amendment."

The article also bemoans the fact that the same people who support the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms are the same people who supported Mitt Romney.

"The Second Amendment is obsolete and now has been twisted to threaten the basic safety and security of all Americans," Rick Nagin wrote.

Nagin also went on to claim that the Second Amendment was only a tool used by "right wing extremists," and blames the NRA for every gun murder in the country.

"Having lost the 2012 election, these forces are now howling for utilizing 'Second Amendment remedies' to get their way," Nagin claimed, without providing any examples or citing any sources. He also falsely claimed that Fox News, the NRA and conservative talk show hosts have "goaded" such talk.

Since the tragic Newtown shootings, liberals have blamed the NRA for the deaths instead of the person who pulled the trigger. Some, like John Cobarruvias, a member of the Texas Democratic Party Executive Committee, have called for NRA members to be killed and many have called for the Second Amendment to be repealed.

"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?" Cobarruvias tweeted. He deleted the tweet and issued an "apology" but he repeated the sentiment on his Facebook page.

"They need to [be] wiped off the face of the earth," he wrote, speaking of the NRA and those who support owning guns.

"Personally if they were wiped off the planet it wouldn't hurt my feelings one bit," he wrote in another comment.

Those comments have since been deleted, but they seem to represent how many in the anti-gun left feel.

Hoft reminded readers that "Stalin was able to control, starve, punish and imprison a defenseless people" after he and the communists took control.

"So," he wrote, "it should come as no surprise that that Communist Party USA would support Barack Obama and his plans to ban assault weapons and place more restrictions on gun owners."

When the Communist party backs you... you know you are doing something right.

I'm pretty sure white supremacists wanted to limit Obama to one term in office.

Which is why saying "extreme assholes agree with you so you must be wrong!" is dead-end fallacious thinking.

I don't think you can honestly disagree with the notion that Obama is a lot more inclined to agree with the principles driving this version of extremism than Mitt Romney is to those of white supremacists.

__________________

“The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend to be something they’re not.” - Hillary Clinton

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

Now, will the complainin' end when someone on the right has a few skin heads supporting them?

__________________My Message to President-Elect Donald Trump:America did NOT became great because of what government did. America became great because of what the U.S. Constitution prevented our government from doing. The people made America great.

I don't think you can honestly disagree with the notion that Obama is a lot more inclined to agree with the principles driving this version of extremism than Mitt Romney is to those of white supremacists.

For every point of view, there's an unreasonable extreme of that position.

For liberalism, there's communism.

For conservativism, there's anarchy.

If I had featured the Anarchy Party in a thread endorsing the opposition to Obama's gun reforms, I'm pretty sure you all'd laugh me out of the forum.

For every point of view, there's an unreasonable extreme of that position.

For liberalism, there's communism.

For conservativism, there's anarchy.

If I had featured the Anarchy Party in a thread endorsing the opposition to Obama's gun reforms, I'm pretty sure you all'd laugh me out of the forum.

Pssst...the Nanny State is not liberalism. It's more like communism.
Conservativism is not remotely even close to anarchy.

__________________My Message to President-Elect Donald Trump:America did NOT became great because of what government did. America became great because of what the U.S. Constitution prevented our government from doing. The people made America great.

My initial inclination was to respond to your first post by saying that that's one of the reasons we end up with a guy like Barack Obama as President. Now I see that that response would have been appropriate. Your explanation just changes the reason from ignorance to indifference.

You got all of that out of my sarcastic post, huh? You have entirely too much time on your hands.

According to the People's World, the CPUSA mouthpiece, "the ability to live free from the fear or threat of gun violence is a fundamental democratic right" that it says supersedes what it called "any so-called personal gun rights allegedly contained in the Second Amendment."

When the Communist party backs you... you know you are doing something right.