On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote:
> Both could be true, although that would probably be the best choice. However, as we approach the point where obtaining IPv4 address space becomes more difficult I think we will have to accept that individual IPv4 addresses will share role much more frequently.
I guess. But the allocation policies, whois requirements etc remain
substantially the same for ipv6.
We might as well forget, for the moment, that we're talking about a
set of IPv4 netblocks in this thread.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)