Umayya Abu-Hanna comes from the Arab Christian community in Israel, has lived in Finland since the 80’s, is a journalist, author and a very familiar voice on Finnish television, radio and in the print media.

Because she is such an accomplished speaker, she has succeeded in using her position as propagandist for the Palestinian cause, as well as spreading her warped views of the history of the conflict and of Israel in general.

When is comes to her ‘tin horn version’ of what should be done to end the conflict, it comes down to only one thing, the destruction of the Jewish state of Israel by creating a bi-national state.

Abu-Hanna was at it again the other day (13.01.09) while the TT was traveling to Helsinki, this time on Finnish radio uttering one outrageous claim and thought after another, with Maisoun Kanaan, Finland’s Palestinian Spokesman, Olli Ruohomäki, Foreign Ministry’s Political Development Deparment Advisor and Wille Rydman, from the National Coalition Youth League as they discussed the Middle East conflict.

Abu-Hanna makes the claim that “troubles started only when European Jews came to the region of Palestine“.

But contrary to her statement, Jews have lived continuously in their ancient homeland since time immemorial. While it’s true that both indigenous and immigrant Jews have suffered pogroms at the hands of the Arabs, not all Arab tribes however viewed the Jews as unwelcome. The Nashashibi clan defended Judaism, and ended up being decimated by the al-Huisseini clan which was headed by the Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the uncle of Yasser Arafat, and a wanted war criminal for his part in forming the SS Balkan Mountain divisions that tried to wipe out Jews in the region.

Abu-Hanna:It’s not a religious conflict just one of politics.

She knows that she’s lying, any Christian Arab understands the proper meaning of Jihad, it’s an often repeated Islamic concept in both the political and religious spheres in Palestinian society. She is also aware of the meaning of dhimmi, and if push came to shove, she would rather live in a Jewish state as an Israeli citizen, than as a dhimmi Christian in a Palestinian state. As for it being purely a political conflict, the rejection of every attempt to solve the conflict through purely political means by the Palestinians, regardless what political party was representing Israel in the negotiations, proves that ‘s not about politics, but one of religious fundamentalism, for the Palestinians have yet to give up on a greater Palestine.

Abu-Hanna: “Israel’s founding is based upon is religious ethnic identity. It’s a Jewish state. And if we label Hamas as Islamic terrorists, then we can say it’s Jewish terror coming from the state of Israel“.

What a disingenuous pin head. Islam is not an ethnicity, but an ideology, even CAIR’s spokesman, Ibrahim Hooper states: “Islam is an ideology. It’s not a race.” Judaism (and Christianity) lacks the “Jihad Ideology“, which in fact, sets it (Islam) apart from all other religions as well. Abu-Hanna knows this, but yet she spins it so, to make Islamic terrorism not a justified term, not unless we are willing to drag in other religions and define their actions in the same way. She’s a shill for Islamic jihad whether she admits to it or not, because she seeks to diminish or obfuscate Islamic justification for the acts being carried out by Hamas and other Islamic fundamentalist/terrorists, because it makes her cause look bad.

Abu-Hanna: “even in the 60’s when you look at the PFLP, it had nothing to with religion“.

Very thin ice, especially for an Arab to be skating on. All one needs to do is look to the actual words of the Arab leaders during the period leading to Israel’s founding, and one sees Muslim anti-Semitism getting a “kick start” from National Socialism, that is founded on Islamic texts, and those that understood and believed in Islamic supremacy, could never allow for a non-Islamic state to be in existence, whether it’s a Jewish of Israel, or a Christian state called Lebanon. Christian Europe stood by and watched Lebanon be depopulated from its Christian majority, in much the same way it’s been watching Bethlehem being depopulated from its once Arab Christian majority.

The conflict has everything to do with Islam’s inability to allow for a Jewish state to exist in what is considered Muslim territory, and so here is a Christian Arab propagandist willingly trying to obfuscate that core reality to the conflict, which is now more than before -perhaps because the Arabs are being so open about it than before- a conflict being for not for independence, but for the glory of the whole Islamic world (Ummah).

Abu Hanna then launched into a rhetoric about Israel wanting to be “as pure of a Jewish state as possible“. By trying to paint Israel’s intention of remaining as a Jewish state, she shows just how much of a racist she actually is, by supporting the traditional Palestinian call for the end of Jewish self determination. She also rejects the reason behind founding of Israel itself, as a safety valve for World anti-Semitism. Jews need to be secure in a land of their own, to ensure all other Jews have a place to turn to during times of trouble.

Well, here is another flagrant bastardization of the historical record. The Tundra Tabloids recognizes it as a moot subject, since everyone involved in the conflict have taken the Arabs’ propaganda point as fact, but there is no such thing as a Palestinian people, anymore than there is a distinct Scandinavian people. It’s simply a name of region, these people are Syrians, Egyptians, Lebanese, Iraqis, Algerians, Moroccans and Hashmites. as well from other sectors of the Ottoman empire, which continually moved people into the area of Palestine due to famine, disease, leaving debt and other assorted reasons. She’s an ethnic Arab wrapping herself in the label of “Palestinian” in order to drive a wedge into Israel’s co-existence with its Arab citizens. Nothing more and nothing less.

When asked whether she approves of an independent Jewish state, in other words a two state solution, her answer was simply “no“. No more proof is needed to show just how much of a hardliner and an anti-Semite this person is. Most likely she would never want to live in a truly Palestinian state, with the likes of Hamas, Fattah and ilk running the show, Finland trumps all that of course.

Abu-Hanna: “The basic problem started when another group came in and stole the land from other already there.”

Problem with that important piece of info is that it’s totally false, she’s lying through her teeth. Perhaps she even believes it to be true, but it’s a well known fiction. Jews purchased land through the Jewish Land Fund from Arab and Turkish land owners, very few Arabs owned any land. Most of the land bought purchased was the worst terrain possible, and many Jews died from disease in trying to drain the land for agriculture. Besides, because of the Ottoma’s usury policies, very few land was ever left to fall into private hands, it would deplete them of a financial industry that had kept inhabitants as indentured serfs for hundreds of years.

Ironically, when the areas that were purchased for large sums of money began to produce wealth, in caused a great migration of Arabs living elswhere to move into the Jewish areas and build their towns. Though there are some people (Jews & Arabs) that can claim they come form generations of people living there for thousands of years, the overwhelming majority of the people in both Israel and those claiming to be indigenous “Palestinians” are in fact …immigrants. KGS

Post navigation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign me up for the newsletter!

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Melting pot societies are the only way to secure the individual…

Multiculturalism is a gross failure. Assimilation, where celebrating one’s own heritage but as a full member of the dominant culture, wins.

There Is No Such Thing As White Cultural Heritage. The West’s Legacy Is Open To All…

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

Trending Israeli News…

IDF prepares to demolish Jerusalem terrorist's house
Army units make initial preparations for demolition of terrorist's house, following murder of Adiel Coleman in the Old City of Jerusalem.Man murdered in Jerusalem attack: Adiel Kolman
Jewish man who was murdered in attack in the Old City of Jerusalem identified as Adiel Kolman, a resident of Kochav Hashahar.Murderer of Rabbi Itamar Ben Gal caught
Israeli forces arrest Israeli Arab responsible for the murder of Rabbi Itamar Ben Gal near Ariel last month.ISRAELI AIR FORCE STRIKES HAMAS TERROR TARGET IN GAZA STRIP
"The attack was carried out in response to the placement of explosive devices on the border fence."

SECULARISM AND RELIGION: THE ONSLAUGHT AGAINST THE WEST’S MORAL CODES

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

Middle East expert Mordechai Kedar: To talk of peace in the Middle East is akin to begging to keep your head connected to your shoulders…

What mainstream Islam really teaches, what they believe…

Trending European News..

SAS sniper kills senior ISIS fighter with 'one in a million' night-time headshot from a mile away close to the Syrian border
SAS sniper kills senior ISIS fighter with 'one in a million' shot
The marksman is said to have killed the terrorist with a 'head shot' close to the Syrian border having been given a window of just 15 seconds. He is understood to be a sergeant with the SAS G-Sqaudron and a veteran of operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan, where he is understood to have recorded as many as 100 kills.Rees-Mogg’s Ultimatum to May: If Britain Bends to EU on Trade Policy It Will Become ‘Joke Nation’Report: Czechs Mulling Moving Embassy to Jerusalem
TEL AVIV – The Czech Republic has begun investigating the possibility of following the U.S.’s lead and moving its embassy to Jerusalem as a result of a diplomatic campaign waged by Israel, Channel 10 reported on Saturday.Danish Social Democrat leader faces criticism after 'using ethnicity' in Facebook debate
Mette Frederiksen has been criticised after she appeared to suggest a commenter was less entitled to take part in debate because of her immigrant background.

Daniel Greenfield explains Islam 101:

"Every devout Muslim is an "Islamist". Islam is not a personal religion. It is a religion of the public space. A "moderate" Muslim would have to reject Islam as a religion of the public space, as theocracy, and that secularism would be a rejection of Islam.

Nothing in Islam exists apart from anything else. While liberals view culture and religion as a buffet that they can pick and choose from, it is a single integrated system. If you accept one part, you must accept the whole. Once you accept any aspect of Islam, you must accept its legal system and once you accept that, you must accept its governance and once you accept that, you lose your rights.''

Trending Middle East News…

Republican Senator expects Trump to pull out of Iran deal
Senator Bob Corker says he expects Trump to pull out of the Iran nuclear agreement in May.Greenblatt: Hamas is burying Gaza's future
Trump’s envoy condemns Samaria terrorist attack, blasts Hamas for welcoming it.Analysis: Here's how to deal with the barbaric Syrian regime
Electrocuting children, turning hospitals into slaughterhouses, using chemical weaponry - how long can this be allowed to continue?(Thanks to Obama for giving a time date for US departure)
Analysts: Iraq War Legacy Marked by Failure, Some Success

Jenin: Massacring Truth (This documentary was made long before the term #FakeNews got started…