BREAKING: DEMOCRATS Get Bad News…Why PA Recount Case Won’t Be So Easy To Pull Off

Tick…tock!
Time is running out for Hillary Clinton and George Soros to steal the
Presidency from Donald Trump. Too bad they didn’t get this little snag
worked out ahead of time. It looks like it may not be as easy as Jill
Stein, (the Green Party candidate who appears to be doing Hillary’s
dirty work, after getting only got 1% of the vote) thought it would be
to throw the election…

Oops! Jill Stein forgot to mention to her donors that she cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania.

Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place.

Trump won Pennsylvania by 70 thousand votes.
Stein would have to prove that fraud was “probable.”
That does not seem likely. Then again, we are talking about the Clintons here. –GP

Per Pennsylvania
regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a
recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn
reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal
and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place.
While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond
reasonable doubt,” it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in
court that fraud was “probable.” This is going to be very difficult
given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say
there is no proof of hacking or fraud.

In fact, the Medium reports that Clinton’s own legal team headed by Marc Elias has noted
that Clinton’s team “had not uncovered any actionable evidence of
hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.” The Obama
administration echoed that by stating that the government did not
observe any increased level of malicious cyber-activity aimed at
disrupting our electoral process on election day. According to Newsmax, Obama is standing behind the results which indicate that Trump won the election, saying the election was “free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.”