Codex Alimentarius is scheduled for full global implementation on December 31, 2009, and not a word has been spoken in main stream media about this threat to humanity. Yet, according to the projections of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), a minimum of 3 billion people will die from the Codex mandated vitamin and mineral guideline alone.

when you read this you got to remember that this was written by the same fool that said that cancer is immetiately cured by eating cottage cheese. These are not going to be laws. They are going to be guidelines.

To quickly quote my friend Jenn, "The CA is not law, it's just guidelines for settling trade disputes and so on between countries...like, if country A complains that fish from country b has mercury in it, the code is consulted to determine if mercury in fish is a valid trade complaint.

It basically limits the amount of pesticide residue and toxins allowed ion foods, requires labeling and hygiene practices, etc. The fringe-folk are upset because it potentially limits the way they're allowed to market their snake-oil- like, only so much of a vitamin allowed per serving ion a supplement, etc. So the ppl who are selling megadose-vitamins as cure-alls would be in violation of those guidelines (but would get away with it as long as Congress ignores the ca, and even then i'm pretty sure it would only involve labels and/or foreign trade)."

I let her talk for me cuz she is a smart one that Jenn. Kinda reminds me of Lucy Van Pelt tho sometimes.

when you read this you got to remember that this was written by the same fool that said that cancer is immetiately cured by eating cottage cheese. These are not going to be laws. They are going to be guidelines.

To quickly quote my friend Jenn, "The CA is not law, it's just guidelines for settling trade disputes and so on between countries...like, if country A complains that fish from country b has mercury in it, the code is consulted to determine if mercury in fish is a valid trade complaint.

It basically limits the amount of pesticide residue and toxins allowed ion foods, requires labeling and hygiene practices, etc. The fringe-folk are upset because it potentially limits the way they're allowed to market their snake-oil- like, only so much of a vitamin allowed per serving ion a supplement, etc. So the ppl who are selling megadose-vitamins as cure-alls would be in violation of those guidelines (but would get away with it as long as Congress ignores the ca, and even then i'm pretty sure it would only involve labels and/or foreign trade)."

I let her talk for me cuz she is a smart one that Jenn. Kinda reminds me of Lucy Van Pelt tho sometimes.

[quote user="MyOwnFlag"]Really couldnt be arsed to read the whole thing so forgive this possibly stupid question. How exactly are they (and just who are "they") making money by lowering worldwide levels of nutrition? [/quote]

If you read it, they are raising nutrition levels, but apparently, not high enough and they're also not going to ban additives and preservatives which, by golly, we've been ingesting for as long as we've already been alive.

Growth hormones in livestock? Moo Moo

seahawks wrote:

I wonder why the removal?.......

MyOwnFlag wrote:

Really couldnt be arsed to read the whole thing so forgive this possibly stupid question. How exactly are they (and just who are "they") making money by lowering worldwide levels of nutrition?

If you read it, they are raising nutrition levels, but apparently, not high enough and they're also not going to ban additives and preservatives which, by golly, we've been ingesting for as long as we've already been alive.

[quote user="MyOwnFlag"]Really couldnt be arsed to read the whole thing so forgive this possibly stupid question. How exactly are they (and just who are "they") making money by lowering worldwide levels of nutrition? [/quote]

Cancer is big business. Along with reducing the population it's a win win. They are eugenicists.

MyOwnFlag wrote:

Really couldnt be arsed to read the whole thing so forgive this possibly stupid question. How exactly are they (and just who are "they") making money by lowering worldwide levels of nutrition?

Cancer is big business. Along with reducing the population it's a win win. They are eugenicists.

[quote user="psidust42"]when you read this you got to remember that this was written by the same fool that said that cancer is immetiately cured by eating cottage cheese. These are not going to be laws. They are going to be guidelines.

To quickly quote my friend Jenn, "The CA is not law, it's just guidelines for settling trade disputes and so on between countries...like, if country A complains that fish from country b has mercury in it, the code is consulted to determine if mercury in fish is a valid trade complaint.

It basically limits the amount of pesticide residue and toxins allowed ion foods, requires labeling and hygiene practices, etc. The fringe-folk are upset because it potentially limits the way they're allowed to market their snake-oil- like, only so much of a vitamin allowed per serving ion a supplement, etc. So the ppl who are selling megadose-vitamins as cure-alls would be in violation of those guidelines (but would get away with it as long as Congress ignores the ca, and even then i'm pretty sure it would only involve labels and/or foreign trade)."

I let her talk for me cuz she is a smart one that Jenn. Kinda reminds me of Lucy Van Pelt tho sometimes.

[/quote]

Actually head cock it's been implemented in Europe already and a major killer of animals fed with BHA "contaminated" animal feed as high vitamin levels are necessary to balance it out, CA prevents this.

Like with all laws that everyone says "they'll never use 'em", the UK is the greatest example of that being the most retarded statement.

psidust42 wrote:

when you read this you got to remember that this was written by the same fool that said that cancer is immetiately cured by eating cottage cheese. These are not going to be laws. They are going to be guidelines.

To quickly quote my friend Jenn, "The CA is not law, it's just guidelines for settling trade disputes and so on between countries...like, if country A complains that fish from country b has mercury in it, the code is consulted to determine if mercury in fish is a valid trade complaint.

It basically limits the amount of pesticide residue and toxins allowed ion foods, requires labeling and hygiene practices, etc. The fringe-folk are upset because it potentially limits the way they're allowed to market their snake-oil- like, only so much of a vitamin allowed per serving ion a supplement, etc. So the ppl who are selling megadose-vitamins as cure-alls would be in violation of those guidelines (but would get away with it as long as Congress ignores the ca, and even then i'm pretty sure it would only involve labels and/or foreign trade)."

I let her talk for me cuz she is a smart one that Jenn. Kinda reminds me of Lucy Van Pelt tho sometimes.

Actually head cock it's been implemented in Europe already and a major killer of animals fed with BHA "contaminated" animal feed as high vitamin levels are necessary to balance it out, CA prevents this.

Like with all laws that everyone says "they'll never use 'em", the UK is the greatest example of that being the most retarded statement.