Phillip claims to have photographed Madeleine McCann in the Ocean club play area but failed to produce the photographs. Margaret assisted Lord Levy in fundraising for political parties, securing loans from philanthropists like Dame Vivien Duffy. In 2007, Lord Levy was arrested whilst Tony Blair was questioned under caution, in the cash for honours scandal.Duffy was Patron to PACT charity

By Daniel Martin Chief Political Correspondent For The Daily Mail and Martin Robinson for MailOnline

Published: 01:51, 29 April 2015 | Updated: 12:47, 29 April 2015

A senior Labour politician - the party's fiercest critic of tax avoidance - has been accused of hypocrisy after it was claimed she was handed more than £1.5million in shares from a tax haven.

Margaret Hodge has built a reputation for taking on those accused of having 'secretive' offshore funds as the chairman of the Commons public accounts committee.

But The Times reported the multi-millionaire had benefited from a controversial scheme that lets wealthy Britons move undeclared assets back to the UK without facing criminal action.

Chairman of the Commons public accounts committee Margaret Hodge has been a fierce critic of tax avoidance - but has reportedly received more than £1.5m in shares from a tax haven

Chairman of the Commons public accounts committee Margaret Hodge has been a fierce critic of tax avoidance - but has reportedly received more than £1.5m in shares from a tax haven

In 2011 she was apparently one of the beneficiaries of the winding-up of a Liechtenstein trust that held shares in the steel-trading business set up by her father.

Just under 96,000 shares in Stemcor handed to Mrs Hodge in that year came from the tiny principality, which is renowned for low tax rates.

Three-quarters of the shares in the family's Liechtenstein trust had previously been held in Panama, which Mrs Hodge described last month as 'one of the most secretive jurisdictions' with 'the least protection anywhere in the world against money laundering'.

The Labour MP has repeatedly attacked big businesses and bankers who used offshore arrangements, but has not declared that she benefited from an offshore trust, the newspaper said.

Philip Davies, the Tory candidate for Shipley, said: 'It is the sheer hypocrisy we have become used to from Labour politicians.'

But Mrs Hodge said she had ensured that 'any shares I held were above board and that I paid all relevant taxes in full. Every time I received any benefit from the company this happened.'

She has always declared her holding in the parliamentary register of financial interests.

Her share of the £1.5million was around £280,000.

In 2011, Mrs Hodge was apparently one of the beneficiaries of the winding-up of a Liechtenstein trust set up by her father, of which three-quarters of the shares had previously been held in Panama (pictured)

In 2011, Mrs Hodge was apparently one of the beneficiaries of the winding-up of a Liechtenstein trust set up by her father, of which three-quarters of the shares had previously been held in Panama (pictured)

In 2012 it emerged her family business paid just 0.25 per cent in tax on its profits.

Mrs Hodge, a multi-millionaire former Labour minister, has been one of the fiercest critics of tax avoidance by companies such as Starbucks, Google and Amazon.

She faced questions over the limited tax paid by Stemcor, the steel trading company of which she is a shareholder and which was founded by her father and is run by her brother.

She said at the time her own shareholding was 'tiny'.

Analysis of Stemcor's accounts showed that the business paid tax of just £163,000 on revenues of more than £2.1billion in 2011.

However, it is not known whether the company – which made profits of £65million – used tax avoidance measures similar to those criticised in the past by Mrs Hodge.

MailOnline has contacted the Labour MP for comment but Ed Balls said today she had 'paid the appropriate tax' following claims she received shares from a tax haven.

The shadow chancellor said his Labour Party colleague had 'done the right thing' following reports in The Times.

Asked about the report at a Labour campaign event in central London, Mr Balls said: 'On the Margaret Hodge question, these were shares which were transferred by her family out of Germany for the Second World War.

'That is the history of this and Margaret has brought those shares onshore and paid the appropriate tax and I think she's done the right thing. I hope that answers your question, thank you for asking it, it's good to be able to clarify that today.'

Ms Hodge has represented the constituency of Barking and Dagenham in East London for 20 years.

"Phillip claims to have photographed Madeleine McCann in the Ocean club play area but failed to produce the photographs."

I raised that issue at some other place a while ago, I was told that he did hand the photographs over to the McCanns and the police, apparently it must be true because he said so when replying to a mail 'from you know who'. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, then where are they? Well it seems that he (Edmonds) is not obliged to provide proof that they were handed over. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, why are the photographs not contained in the PJ files? Well it seems there is no need, why should they be? Err - because it's evidence? Hmmm ok.

So I asked, how could he have passed (implying by hand) over said photographs to the McCanns and the police when he jetted off back to Switzerland before he could have known Madeleine had gone missing? Have you never heard of electronic mail I was asked? Have to admit that totally flummoxed me, not as the vanquished but because a) how would he know where to contact the McCanns and what police did he allegedly pass his photographs to - the Swiss Guard? b) Why would it occur to him once back in Switzerland that his photographs had Madeleine McCann in the background. c) How would he necessarily know what she looked like?

This is from a McCann sceptic (not me)? Perhaps the tin foil hat is restricting the circulation of blood to my brain but it seems to me that Edmonds was/is part of the McCann protection racket.

____________________“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx

"Phillip claims to have photographed Madeleine McCann in the Ocean club play area but failed to produce the photographs."

I raised that issue at some other place a while ago, I was told that he did hand the photographs over to the McCanns and the police, apparently it must be true because he said so when replying to a mail 'from you know who'. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, then where are they? Well it seems that he (Edmonds) is not obliged to provide proof that they were handed over. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, why are the photographs not contained in the PJ files? Well it seems there is no need, why should they be? Err - because it's evidence? Hmmm ok.

So I asked, how could he have passed (implying by hand) over said photographs to the McCanns and the police when he jetted off back to Switzerland before he could have known Madeleine had gone missing? Have you never heard of electronic mail I was asked? Have to admit that totally flummoxed me, not as the vanquished but because a) how would he know where to contact the McCanns and what police did he allegedly pass his photographs to - the Swiss Guard? b) Why would it occur to him once back in Switzerland that his photographs had Madeleine McCann in the background. c) How would he necessarily know what she looked like?

This is from a McCann sceptic (not me)? Perhaps the tin foil hat is restricting the circulation of blood to my brain but it seems to me that Edmonds was/is part of the McCann protection racket.

I have believed this to be the case all along....its not the Mcs but Edmonds who is being protected !!! I have never noticed any statement from him or am I mistaken ? He cut his holiday short and flew out before the shit hit the fan !!!

"Phillip claims to have photographed Madeleine McCann in the Ocean club play area but failed to produce the photographs."

I raised that issue at some other place a while ago, I was told that he did hand the photographs over to the McCanns and the police, apparently it must be true because he said so when replying to a mail 'from you know who'. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, then where are they? Well it seems that he (Edmonds) is not obliged to provide proof that they were handed over. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, why are the photographs not contained in the PJ files? Well it seems there is no need, why should they be? Err - because it's evidence? Hmmm ok.

So I asked, how could he have passed (implying by hand) over said photographs to the McCanns and the police when he jetted off back to Switzerland before he could have known Madeleine had gone missing? Have you never heard of electronic mail I was asked? Have to admit that totally flummoxed me, not as the vanquished but because a) how would he know where to contact the McCanns and what police did he allegedly pass his photographs to - the Swiss Guard? b) Why would it occur to him once back in Switzerland that his photographs had Madeleine McCann in the background. c) How would he necessarily know what she looked like?

This is from a McCann sceptic (not me)? Perhaps the tin foil hat is restricting the circulation of blood to my brain but it seems to me that Edmonds was/is part of the McCann protection racket.

I have believed this to be the case all along....its not the Mcs but Edmonds who is being protected !!! I have never noticed any statement from him or am I mistaken ? He cut his holiday short and flew out before the shit hit the fan !!!

It is a matter of debate that he left early on the morning of the 4th May - there is no proof of this - it may have been a 'planted' story. I also believe that this is all about protection of so-called VIPs that were present there. Well there is no question really - nothing else warrants this ongoing charade.

@HelenMeg wrote:It is a matter of debate that he left early on the morning of the 4th May - there is no proof of this - it may have been a 'planted' story. I also believe that this is all about protection of so-called VIPs that were present there. Well there is no question really - nothing else warrants this ongoing charade.

It has to be something like that.

The sheer scale of the "help" provided is mind boggling for a pair of middle class nobodies.

"Phillip claims to have photographed Madeleine McCann in the Ocean club play area but failed to produce the photographs."

I raised that issue at some other place a while ago, I was told that he did hand the photographs over to the McCanns and the police, apparently it must be true because he said so when replying to a mail 'from you know who'. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, then where are they? Well it seems that he (Edmonds) is not obliged to provide proof that they were handed over. Hmmm ok.

So I asked, why are the photographs not contained in the PJ files? Well it seems there is no need, why should they be? Err - because it's evidence? Hmmm ok.

So I asked, how could he have passed (implying by hand) over said photographs to the McCanns and the police when he jetted off back to Switzerland before he could have known Madeleine had gone missing? Have you never heard of electronic mail I was asked? Have to admit that totally flummoxed me, not as the vanquished but because a) how would he know where to contact the McCanns and what police did he allegedly pass his photographs to - the Swiss Guard? b) Why would it occur to him once back in Switzerland that his photographs had Madeleine McCann in the background. c) How would he necessarily know what she looked like?

This is from a McCann sceptic (not me)? Perhaps the tin foil hat is restricting the circulation of blood to my brain but it seems to me that Edmonds was/is part of the McCann protection racket.

I have believed this to be the case all along....its not the Mcs but Edmonds who is being protected !!! I have never noticed any statement from him or am I mistaken ? He cut his holiday short and flew out before the shit hit the fan !!!

It is a matter of debate that he left early on the morning of the 4th May - there is no proof of this - it may have been a 'planted' story. I also believe that this is all about protection of so-called VIPs that were present there. Well there is no question really - nothing else warrants this ongoing charade.

I agree, the UK Government is protecting itself not the McCanns.

I have a number of thoughts about this including;

1. The Spartacus Club2. The cash for honours Scandal of 2006/07

Tony Blair:

1. Questioned under caution about cash for honours in 2006/7 (twice)2. Linked to PACT and Missing People3. Rapidly appointed Clarence Mitchell as spokesman for the McCanns4. Took holidays in Cliff Richards' villa

2007

1. Cash for honours scandal2. Missing people in desperate need of a boost, a "new beginning"3. News International was also suffering

More research is required on this Spartacus Club, I did wonder whether any hotels or guest houses near PDL accommodated these people.

____________________"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron

Admittedly I haven't seen documented proof of Edmonds time of departure, such as an airline ticket, I don't think there is any doubt that he left on 4th May at some time, rather than the 5th, the date he was booked with Warners to depart. Perhaps nothing sinister in someone leaving prematurely, particularly if flying to a different destination than the scheduled return (which appears likely in the case - there is reference to the possibility somewhere on Warners booking forms) but to my simple brain, Ocean Club PDL on the Portuguese Algarve doesn't quite fit the bill of someone with such an illustrious background. Rubbing shoulders with a bunch of small time medics, from differenct parts of the UK, gathered together for a weeks jolly? Doesn't sound very likely to me, even more intriguing however is Edmonds reply to shhhh - you know who:

"Having been in Portugal at the time of Madeleine’s disappearance and seen allof the events first hand, there is not one shred of doubt in my mindthat the events as reported were correct."

What events did he see first hand and what reported events were correct - reported in the UK press? I don't think so!

The statement indicates to me that he had first hand knowledge of the McCanns movements during that week, adding this to his knowledge of Madeleine's appearance (couldn't possibly have been from press reports and/or the photograph officially issued by the PJ because they were nothing like the Madeleine taken on the holiday) I wonder if he actually knew the McCanns or other T9 friends. On the other hand he could of course be politely telling TB to naff off (I admit if a stranger wrote to me in that manner I would most certainly tell him to naff off) but why then reply in the first place? Maybe the answer to that is in this quote:

"However, I would also not want further conspiracy theories to fester by simply ignoring your letter."

Another curious comment IMO. Such an important witness but no documented statements or no proof of said photographs, very fishy.

____________________“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx

From what I've seen of PDL and this is no offence to the Portuguese who live there it's hardly an authentic Portuguese destination, it has no particular Portuguese native charm, the golf courses are quite a shout away, the accommodation isn't up to much and it looks like Butlins-on-Sea. There is a large ex-pat population from what I gather and there are lots of holiday lets. Now why would someone with money choose PDL?

sharonl today @ 8:59 pm (sorry for getting your name wrong last post, my eyes must be a bit dodgy)

I recall reading something about the Spartacus Club that quite made my stomach churn. It was advertising discount for members who wished to avail themselves of the facilities on offer at various child care institutions. How sordid can you get, these people are the scum of the universe and that's not my opinion it's fact.

____________________“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx

@aquila wrote:From what I've seen of PDL and this is no offence to the Portuguese who live there it's hardly an authentic Portuguese destination, it has no particular Portuguese native charm, the golf courses are quite a shout away, the accommodation isn't up to much and it looks like Butlins-on-Sea. There is a large ex-pat population from what I gather and there are lots of holiday lets. Now why would someone with money choose PDL?

Quite, in a nutshell! It's a resort for package tourists and as you say ex-pats. I believe on at least one occasion he booked at the Tapas restaurant for dinner. Hardly comparable to the Carlton Club is it?

____________________“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx

@aquila wrote:From what I've seen of PDL and this is no offence to the Portuguese who live there it's hardly an authentic Portuguese destination, it has no particular Portuguese native charm, the golf courses are quite a shout away, the accommodation isn't up to much and it looks like Butlins-on-Sea. There is a large ex-pat population from what I gather and there are lots of holiday lets. Now why would someone with money choose PDL?

Quite, in a nutshell! It's a resort for package tourists and as you say ex-pats. I believe on at least one occasion he booked at the Tapas restaurant for dinner. Hardly comparable to the Carlton Club is it?

The beach isn't up to much either (once again apologies to the Portuguese living in PDL). A few tennis courts, a few ex-pat bars, a couple of supermarkets selling products specifically to suit ex-pats and a Tapas Bar with a large proportion of UK and non-Portuguese staff.

@aquila wrote:From what I've seen of PDL and this is no offence to the Portuguese who live there it's hardly an authentic Portuguese destination, it has no particular Portuguese native charm, the golf courses are quite a shout away, the accommodation isn't up to much and it looks like Butlins-on-Sea. There is a large ex-pat population from what I gather and there are lots of holiday lets. Now why would someone with money choose PDL?

Quite, in a nutshell! It's a resort for package tourists and as you say ex-pats. I believe on at least one occasion he booked at the Tapas restaurant for dinner. Hardly comparable to the Carlton Club is it?

The beach isn't up to much either (once again apologies to the Portuguese living in PDL). A few tennis courts, a few ex-pat bars, a couple of supermarkets selling products specifically to suit ex-pats and a Tapas Bar with a large proportion of UK and non-Portuguese staff.

It just don't fit right, does it with the Millionaire Lifestyle that he has........I heard he flew back on his private jet late at night or early hours in the morning cutting his holiday short.

Eddie and Keela alerted to items and places concerned with the McCanns - and importantly to no other items or places.

According to Eddie and Keela, the body of Madeleine McCann lay lifeless behind the sofa in Apartment 5a, clinging to the only thing from which she could derive any comfort; a soft toy called 'Cuddle cat'.

Kate's book 'madeleine', Page 219: "Did they really believe that a dog could smell the 'odour of death' three months later from a body that had been so swiftly removed?"

After forensic analysis of the 'Last Photo' there is little doubt now that the pool photo CANNOT POSSIBLY have been taken on the Thursday 3rd May, but most likely on the Sunday 29th April. So, where was Madeleine at lunchtime on Thursday?

John McCann:"This was terrible for them, Kate dressed Amelie in her sister's pyjamas and the baby said: "Maddy's jammies, where is Maddy?"Martin Roberts:"If Madeleine's pyjamas had not, in fact, been abducted then neither had Madeleine McCann."Dr Martin Roberts: A Nightwear Job

Death Toll in McCann Case

Gerry McCann called for an example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014 after a 'Dossier' was handed in to Police by McCann supporters. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room the next day. Brenda paid the price.

Colin Shalke died suddenly in mysterious circumstances with a significant amount of morphine in his system. At the Inquest the coroner said there was no evidence as to how he had come to take morphine, and no needle mark was found.

Ex-Met DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC1's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window' of opportunity' from 3 mins to 45 mins, in accordance with their remit, to allow the staged abduction to happen.

Tracey Kandohla: "A McCann pal told The Sun Online: "Some of the savings have been siphoned off from the Find Maddie Fund into a fixed asset account, which financial experts have advised them to do. It can be used for purchases like buying a house or building equipment."

The McCanns, Operation Grange and the BBC are all working towards one goal - to make us keep looking at what happened (or didn't happen) on 3rd May, instead of looking at what happened days earlier. There is NO evidence of an abduction. Smithman is ALL they have got. Without that, they are sunk. No wonder Operation Grange clings on to Smithman...

Lord Bernard Hogan-Howe QPM, retired Met Commissioner: "There will be a point at which we and the Government will want to make a decision about what the likely outcome is."

Dr Gonçalo Amaral, retired PJ Coordinator: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened, they don't need to investigate anything. When MI5 opens their files, then we will know the truth."