Pages

Monday, 18 May 2015

Kate Loves: Life at Anmer Hall

The picturesque village of Anmer in West Norfolk is situated on the royal estate at Sandringham. Despite its tiny population - said to be less than sixty people - it has become synonymous with the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge since Her Majesty gifted Anmer Hall to the couple.

The name Anmer is thought to derive from the Old English meaning 'duck pond'. The place name 'Anmer' is first attested in the Domesday Book of 1086, where it appears as 'Anemere'. 'Anmer' was the name of the horse belonging to King George V which occasioned the death of the suffragette Emily Davison at the 1913 Epsom Derby, after she stepped in front of it during the race.

"UK Anmer" by Uksignpix

The late-Georgian house dates from the late 18th century and features two storeys and an attic with dormer windows.

More on the architecture of the house from Wikipedia:

'It has two storeys and attic with dormer windows. The long south front comprises 13 bays, and was refaced with red bricks c. 1815. It has 13 ground-floor windows set in blank arches and a semicircular porch on two Tuscan columns, with 11 windows on the first floor.

The three central bays are topped by a pediment. The north front is of rubble carstone and includes four c. 17th century ogee-headed sashes on the first floor. Renovations c. 1900 added a brick dressed skin to the north front, together with a projecting entrance porch and a tower towards the eastern end, in the corner formed with a carstone service wing also added c. 1900.'

The Sandringham estate was bought by Queen Victoria in 1862 as a wedding present for the Prince of Wales, later Edward VII, and neighbouring land was added to the estate in subsequent years with Anmer Hall bought for the estate in 1898. It became the residence of John Loader Maffey who was to become Governor-General of the Sudan and wartime ambassador to Dublin. His daughter Penelope was reportedly a favourite of King George V.

In more recent times, it was leased by the Duke and Duchess of Kent from 1972 to 1990. Sadly it was the scene of much sadness when their fourth child was stillborn in 1977. The Duchess suffered severely with depression in the years that followed and with Her Majesty's blessing mostly withdrew from public life, converted to catholicism and dropped her royal title. Below we see the Kents on the Sandringham estate in 1982.

It was later rented by Prince Charles's dear friend Hugh van Cutsem, and during this time it is understood Charles conducted his affair with Camilla there - regularly meeting her secretly. It was then leased to James Everett, owner of kitchen timber company Norfolk Oak, whose lease was not due to expire until 2017. Rumours began circulating around time of Prince William's 30th birthday alleging his grandmother had gifted him a property on the Sandringham estate.

Anmer Hall began to crop up as the choice for the couple's new home. And in many ways it was not met with surprise; when the van Cutsems resided at the property Prince William and Harry had often enjoyed long days playing there and exploring the grounds. Having spent his Christmases on the Sandringham estate, it held strong ties for the Prince and the privacy it afforded would have appealed enormously to the second-in-line too. The paparazzi are no longer allowed to photograph members of the Royal family relaxing there.

Initially, it was very much thought Anmer would be something of a country bolt hole for the Cambridges allowing them to get away from London life at their newly refurbished apartment at Kensington Palace. Following a transitional year which saw William undertake an agricultural course at Cambridge University, it was announced in August 2014 he had decided to return to flying and signed into a two year minimum contract with the East Anglian Air Ambulance.

The decision came with the news Anmer Hall would be the family's primary home for the foreseeable future, and royal sources said they believe William wishes to remain in the position for "several years". During this time, there would be no increase in duties for either of the Cambridges with the palace confirming: "The Duchess will continue with her small portfolio of work and focus on being a mother."

Wikipedia

Extensive renovations were undertaken at Anmer Hall, with £1.5 million spent on upgrading the mansion. Architect Charles Morris designed a new garden room and supervised the rerouting of the driveway to create a larger parking area. It is believed the decor is traditional and classic, but modern twists have been added with the dining room painted a jewel green and a new contemporary child-friendly kitchen installed.

You can see a video of the previous kitchen at Anmer Hall at the manufacturer's NAKED Kitchens YouTube channel.

Before work was completed, sightings of photos of Kate in nearby towns emerged. Obviously eager to settle into her new home and get a feel for the local area, the Duchess spent many a Saturday in the market town of Holt sourcing antiques and softer pastel shade fabrics to decorate the manor.

ITV

Much like Anglesey, Anmer has proved to be a perfect fit for the couple who crave a life away from the media spotlight. And once again, much like Anglesey, the locals are incredibly protective and respectful of them. Below we see William and Kate leaving the nearby King's Head Hotel where they enjoyed a romantic dinner with ice cream for dessert.

Daily Star Sunday

An onlooker said: "William was extremely affectionate and considerate towards Kate throughout. She walked in with wet hair. She kept playing with it, twisting it around her fingers while talking to him. They were quite flirtatious and couldn't keep their hands off each other. When they had finished their meal, a couple of locals came up to them and said hello. They smiled and were very chatty. My overwhelming feeling was how normal they were."

The King's Head

When it came time to celebrate Christmas, the Cambridges who had been alternating between Sandringham with the royals and the Middletons home in Bucklebury for the festivities decided to start a tradition of their own. The couple made the short walk to St Mary Magdalene Church holdings hands, After the service, they returned to Anmer Hall to enjoy an informal day with the Middletons and Prince George. A new tradition I suspect we'll see continue and once again proof the Cambridges are determined to do things their way.

William and Kate adore the outdoors, a love already shared by Prince George who loves nothing more than a trip to Snettisham Park with Kate or an outing to Dersingham Recreation Park with Nanny Maria Teresa. The tot makes full use of the swings and slides. A local resident told People: "All the local boys and girls got to play with Prince George. It's really nice. He was just like any other boy."

New Idea / The British Monarchy Heir Facebook Page

Kate has become a regular face in Norfolk and recently she popped into Grapes Gallery in Snettisham to browse and enquire about picture framing services. Owner Rob Kerr told People: "When she left, I just said, I can't believe what I've just done! I didn't call her 'Your Royal Highness or anything like that. She didn't come across as the type of person who would expect people to say anything anyway. She was very down to earth."

Geograph

The Duchess is a regular visitor to the charming Burnham Market where she regularly visits Pentney House Hat Shop. The local hat shop has supplied pieces to Her Majesty in the past. Director Maxwell Graham-Wood also spoke to People and said: "Kate has been in several times, once with William, once with her mother and a couple of times on her own. She just potters around looking at things, so we just like to leave her alone and not make a fuss."

Geograph

Mr Graham-Wood recalled the day Kate visited with William: "We have two big rooms upstairs, one with ladies hats and one with men's hats. They both went into each room and were laughing and joking with each other as well as other customers and staff. They are very natural together. When they were upstairs it was like a church downstairs because everyone was pointing to the ceiling going, do you know who's up there?"

Burnham Market

It was a real thrill for the shop when they spotted Kate wearing their gloves (pictured below) on an official engagement (with a special thank you to Kate & Pippa Style).

Moving forward, it seems the couple plan to integrate into the community as much as possible. Prince William enjoys camaraderie with the other men who work at the East Anglian Air Ambulance and Kate has plans to join the local Women's Institute. President of the Anmer Club which has fourteen members, former barrister Dorothy Pulsford-Harris had written to Kate before Christmas asking her to join: "I had a very nice letter back from her private secretary saying she was interested. We would be delighted to see her."

Glancing through the Anmer Women's Institute website the upcoming monthly meetings will comprise of a garden meeting, a flower arranging demo, a craft meeting and Commemoration of WW1 anniversary with food and dress from the evening. Below we see Anmer's social club.

The Duchess will be following royal tradition by joining the local WI. The Queen became a member of the Sandringham WI in 1943 and is now the branch's president having taken over the role from the Queen Mother.

At present, the couple are enjoying their first weeks with Princess Charlotte. Big brother Prince George is said to be "fascinated" by his little sister.

Contrary to media reports, no, Carole Middleton has not abandoned ship at Bucklebury Manor, to the detriment of her marriage, to manage Anmer Hall, In fact, Mr and Mrs Middleton have been spotted driving around in their Range Rover and enjoying pub lunches in Bucklebury. Of course, they're paying regular visits to William and Kate and vice versa but William and Kate are "very relaxed, very calm, this time round. They're not first time parents any more", as one royal commentator remarked.

Determined to ensure paparazzi don't follow them to Norfolk, Kensington Palace issued a warning letter to the media reminding them: "Anmer Hall is part of the Sandringham Estate which is a private Estate".

BBC Peter Hunt

I spoke with a lady named June who lives close to Anmer and she and her husband have spotted William and Kate in the local area several times. I think June's sentiments finish the post up nicely.

"Norfolk is the best place you could raise a family. Fresh air and friendly people! I've seen Kate at a local bakery in Holt fetching homemade bread and pastries and William is regularly seen out cycling early in the morning. My neighbour saw them out for a local pub lunch and remarked how friendly and down to earth they were. It's great they can live a normal life here, it's great their children can have a childhood like any other child here, enjoying play and fun, what every parent wants for their little ones really."

What a post Charlotte, thanks. It was fascinating to read all through, Anmer certainly has a history of its own. They must feel really happy out there. I hope they will provide us some pictures very soon.I understand their warning letter but I am afraid they could do more to satisfy the public by publishing more photos. More photos less interest, I still believe in this.

My family says I know as much about england now as I do the United States. All because ofWilliam and Kate. :)I do have travel itineraries planned,including Wales. I am eager to go.I will share photos and pub reviewsperhaps. There is a lively walking path by the pangor river in Bucklebury that I know will be visited with a picnic en route.:) So many places to visit for relatively small Islands. all thehistory and scenic beauty and local culture. (do I sound like an Anglophile or what?):)

Me too, Anonymous Anglophile! I've been several times--not lately, to my regret--and I am so eager to go back. I do warn you that one trip whets the appetite for more, more, more!! Enjoy!! And don't postpone it any longer than you have to. It's wonderful to go when you are young and can walk ten miles a day and hop on and off the tube a hundred times a day and run with abandon to the top of Observatory Hill in Greenwich. I'm 70 now and have to plan my excursions more judiciously, but I remember the old days with such pleasure. Thanks for telling me about the walking path by the Pangor River in Buckleberry though. I may tackle that one--with a long picnic break! :-)

Yes Anmer certainly looks like a lovely place to raise children in the country-side. It's a bit of a pity having the history of Charles conducting his affair with Camilla there, but I guess the past is the past... I'm sure the Cambridge family will create great memories of their own with their growing family. I read somewhere today that there is not a lot 'going on' at Sandringham, and there's a population of approximately 60 on the estate. This to me signifies how important it is to William and Kate to create their own path in their world, and good for them!

Prince Charles has recently taken over management of Sandringham, which includes Anmer Hall, from his father. The estate will likely be increasing population as indicated by this article from the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11315280/Prince-Charles-handed-responsibility-for-Sandringham.html

William and Kate are continuing the tradition of living on royal estates owned by the monarch. Elizabeth's grandfather George and grandmother Mary also resided at Sandringham while George's father Edward VII was King. George occupied himself and stayed out of affairs until it was time for him to serve. Therefore, I don't see William and Kate creating their own path in the world - but following precedent.

Glad to see that you mentioned the fact that William and Kate don't own Anmer Hall--it is a grace-and-favour residence; the Queen, and soon Charles, owns the property.

Further--not that it matters much, given that Anmer Hall is nothing more than an *Indian Gift*--rest assured that William does not hold title to it--this so-called gift was NOT given to William and Kate; it was given to William exclusively on his 30th birthday. Probably to enable Charles to begin to repair some of the more delapitated properties on the Sandringham Estate. (The Queen is not noted for upkeep, the only exception being Windsor Castle, which she seems to particularly like.)

And I agree, Maryland Moxie, that William and Kate are not in charge of their fate; right now, they have to serve two masters, the Queen and the Prince of Wales, and it must be hellish. Not even Charles, who likes to moan and groan about his life, had to contend with this.

JC - I've often thought it was Charles and his friends who set William up with the current pilot job by providing the specialized helicopter - I'm sure it was a family decision - he had to leave the military because his unit was privatized and he hasn't been trained to do anything else. The reality is they have to live on a family estate for security reasons. I think the taxpayers would go nuts if they had to pay for another generation's security - particularly if they weren't necessarily active in "royal duties". I don't think they can add to the collection of properties needing protecting. There was much complaining about the cost of Kate being at Bucklebury after George.

I don't know that I'd be that cross at my Grandmother - who provided me a house and staff - and my father - who provided me a job that I enjoy. But I don't doubt there are tensions with Charles sometimes and things are going to get tricky when the Queen passes and the titles shift. So not hellish yet.. in my opinion.

Anon at 20:34 - I don't know about it being "hellish" to have to "serve" the Queen and Prince Charles. These so-called "masters" of the Cambridges have gifted William and Kate a very large country mansion and have provided them 5+ million pounds for refurbishing this home and another very large residence. Kate's father-in-law pays for her wardrobe. What is hellish about any of that? In fact, they should be thankful that Prince Charles and the Queen both outrank them. If Kate and William were the Prince and Princess of Wales right now, rather than 2nd-in-line to the throne, they wouldn't be able to retire to the countryside and live secluded lives with few royal obligations. I'd say that Prince Charles or the Queen have much more dictated lives right now than Kate and William do.

I'm with everyone on the "not so hellish" argument, although I did see yesterday I think that the palace is trying to renegotiate the agreement they had with WK and get them (or Kate, not sure which) to do more. That would negate the argument that the Queen's happy with the status quo if true. The same article indicated they live on £1.240,000 per annum, plus any income William takes from his trust fund. Not bad when you don't have to pay rent anywhere either.

bluhare-21/5-14:36-Amazing that "the palace" (BP,KP, CH?) released that extremely delicate information,especially during the process and not after a decision has been made. Would you mind revealing whereyou read this? I can't seem to find it in any official releases. Is the palace source named?

I just keep thinking about how Happy Diana would be to see that William not only "Found that Someone to Love & To Cherish" But to have succeeded as he has so far to enable his Family to put down roots & have as "Normal" a life as is possible with 3 of them in Direct Succession to The Throne! This would Never have been seen 30+ yrs ago! They wanted this & thus far they appear to be achieving it��

Thank you for this post on Anmer. What a lovely place to raise children. And I so appreciate your thoughtful and tasteful presentation without disturbing The Royals. We do enjoy hearing about them -- from a discreet distance. You have shown us things about Anmer that I did not know.

She really does an amazing job of providing interesting information while still being respectful of their wishes and needs for privacy. I honestly feel that the information I get from this site makes me feel like I know more of TRH than any other blog or publication. Cheers, Charlotte!

Hi Charlotte, I follow your blog but rarely comment, but I wanted to thank you for ALL your informative posts regarding the Duke & Duchess and their growing family. I loved your information on Anmer Hall and nearby Norfolk & Holt. I wish you & your family the very best always! Best regards, Linda

I would love a "kate loves books/reading". I read somewhere that before the marriage she was regulary seen buying books. It would be great to know if she still reeds art based literature or non-fiction. Maybe Difficult to find out. I like you're site and hard work for it very much. A reader from Belgium!

Wonderful post Charlotte! Your "Kate Loves" series are my favorites to read through. They are so informative about a wide variety of topics. Amner seems like a picture perfect place to settle out of the media spot light to raise a young family. So glad that in this connected day and age they are find peace they seek even with their level of public accessibility. They will have many happy family memories from their time in the country. I am a little disappointed that there won't be more royal duties coming up in the near future but purely from a selfish standpoint.

The Sandringham and Balmoral estates are owned by royal family trusts, inclusive of all the buildings on them. This means that the Queen did not "gift" Anmer Hall to the Cambridges; she simply gave them the right to live in it. They do not own the house, just as they do not own their Kensington Palace flat.

William is set to inherit the entire estate after Charles passes. It is quite possible he may be learning about how large estates are run by living there. He's never had to manage a property - whereas Charles has been managing Highgrove and the Duchy of Cornwall for some time. Prince Phillip recently turned over the management of Sandringham to Charles who will no doubt implement changes. Here's an article from the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11315280/Prince-Charles-handed-responsibility-for-Sandringham.html

Actually that's not accurate. According to the official monarchy website, Sandringham and Balmoral are private residences owned by the Queen whereas Kensington is a public residence owned by a trust for future monarchs. It would seem like the Queen could do whatever she wants with her private affairs, including gifting.

I think you are wrong---Sandringham was bought for Edward Vii when he was Prince of Wales and more land has been added since. Balmoral too is privately owned. George VI had to buy them from the Duke of Windsor when he abdicated.They were purchased after the crown lands had been handed over in return for first the Civil list and now a proportion of income from the crown lands.Charlotte will, I am sure, know if this is correct.

I didn't say Sandringham and Balmoral were part of the Crown Estate, simply that they are owned by royal family trusts. This arrangement was made after George VI had to buy them back from Edward VIII following the latter's abdication. They are no longer inherited personally by one individual, the monarch, but rather held by a private trust. I didn't mean to imply that Sandringham, Balmoral, and Kensington Palace had the same ownership. That was not my point. I was pointing out that the Cambridges do not personally own Anmer Hall any more than they personally own their KP flat.

Or said another way -- William does not pay tax on the house he lives in - he is squatting there by the grace and favor of the Queen. Anne's children have a similar arrangement on her privately owned Gatcombe Park. Where the family may take a huge financial hit is when the Queen passes and Charles inherits. This hasn't come up for 60+ years.

Anon at 20.17 is correct. Balmoral and Sandringham are privately owned by the Monarch. If the UK were to become a Republic, Sandringham Estate and Balmoral will remain the property of the Royals. Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle are held by the Royal Family Trust.

Moxie your comment makes W&K sound like low life squaters. I don't understand why you have soiund a hard time with W&K life/ You do not live in the UK nor pay any type of taxes so your really don't have room to complain. We here are all just fans.

I also thought that squatting was a denigrating choice of words. It is not unusual for parents and grandparents to help their families out in many ways.If you have homes and lands etc. to share, why not. William isn't just sitting around watching soaps and eating Bon Bons and even if he was his grandmother can bless him however she chooses.

I'm not complaining at all. They've got a sweet life in a beautiful home where they have no worries about mortgages or taxes - the only other folks that applies to are squatters. He certainly wouldn't be able to afford to live like that on his RAF and private pilot job. I'm all for rich Grandmothers!

Wow. I read up on those articles you suggested - that was some serious smart financial planning by the monarch's team. I did not know that about Charles and Phillip fighting over Birkhall either. No inheritance tax for monarch's then. The problem comes up - if she leaves something to anyone other then Charles. Is that correct?

The use of the word squatting implies they are there without permission which I agree is not true. But her point that they live there rent and tax free is correct. Please don't start with the "you aren't British so you don't have room to complain" argument. As has been pointed out ad nauseum, if Charlotte implemented the no Brits or no British residents rule, the number of posters on this board -- including more than a few diehard fans; maybe even you -- would plummet.

Anon 04:55-re: MM-Ah, but look at all the responses She and Vittoria seem of one mind.They did raise a question in my mind: if Sandringham is HM's to sell or give away, then it is private property indeedand not part of the monarch to monarch bequest. She could leave it to Edward and Sophie, not immediate heirs. The property could be subject to taxes (wasn't there some act of Parliament in the past few yearsabout the Queen paying taxes now?) Leo/Julia-this seems like a subject that needs your research and input-whether the Queen pays taxes onSandringham -and if so, as a whole, or would Anmer Hall be considered separately and be W&C's responsibility? Are gifts worth over a certain amount taxable at time of transfer? Could inheritance tax be avoided this way? through gifting.The inheritance tax has decimated the landed aristocracy.

MM may have hit on the truth on that point. However the "squatter" reference may have been inaccurate.Legally, "squatters" take possession of a property without the owner's consent. Hardly the case in this example, I would say.

Moxie, william has an interest income from the monies his mother left for him in a trust. Not just his pilot's salary. The $200,000+ number has been reported. He may have other trusts as gifts from godparents, dignitaries, who knows. If a cabinet making family can find the means to live in Amner Hall I don't think it is allthat "rich and lavish" to do as you intimated.

Along with Sandringham House in Norfolk, ownership of Balmoral was inherited by Edward VIII on his accession in 1936. When he abdicated later the same year, however, he retained ownership of them. A financial settlement was devised, under which Balmoral and Sandringham were purchased by Edward's brother and successor to the Crown, George VI.

Currently, the estate is not owned outright by the monarch, but rather by Trustees under Deeds of Nomination and Appointment.

Wikipedia's information always needs to be verified, of course. Balmoral was purchased by Prince Albert rather than by Queen Victoria, and apparently Birkhall as well. Sandringham was bought for the then Prince of Wales, their son Albert, later Edward VII. It does not appear that any of these properties are now owned outright by the Queen or anyone else in the royal family.

What was the difficulty between Prince Philip and Prince Charles over Birkhall?

I truly believe that those on this blog who keep mentioning William and Kate living rent free, no taxes, squatting (or whatever the particular reference to the privileged lifestyle might be on any given day) are, at the basis of the whole thing, jealous. Yes, I said the "J" word. I believe that is the root of it. After all the discourse published on this blog it has proven itself over and over again in my opinion.

What's wrong with being a little jealous? I'll admit it. Yes, I wish that I could live my life in two different mansions that I did not have to buy or pay rent for, and then also get multimillion pound refurbishments done on them for almost completely free. Who wouldn't want that? Being slightly jealous (and I'm not speaking for others and whether or not they are jealous) doesn't make everything you say untrue. It is factually correct that William and Kate receive many of the same benefits as "squatters." As bluhare pointed out - the main difference is simply that they DO have permission. But seriously, in what other part of life is it possible for someone to live in a home not owned by them without paying rent, and also demanding that renovations are done to their exact liking? Sure, any landlord would have to install plumbing (but also would use rent money to recoup the costs). But I don't know of any landlord who would agree to foot the cost of a bill that involves things like building new rooms in the apartment, etc. They'd tell you to pay for that yourself, on top of rent, or to find an apartment with the layout you like. Just because someone may be jealous of Kate and William's ability to receive these benefits doesn't mean that they are saying so out of jealousy, or that it is factually incorrect. As long as people are able to temper their jealousy and understand the downsides of certain lifestyles, and the upsides of their own, it isn't necessarily bad or unhealthy. It's normal.

As for this argument about cabinet-makers being able to live in Anmer Hall - uhm, not "just" cabinet makers, but rather, the owners of a bespoke kitchen design firm. No doubt their salaries were far, FAR higher than William's as an air ambulance pilot. Also William wasn't working for most of the time since they got Anmer and had it renovated - so he didn't have any salary like others. And, the owners of this firm may have struggled to find 1.5 million pounds to do renovations on top of paying rent. So yes, I think that it's pretty rich and lavish. And there's nothing wrong with that!

Thanks, Moxie, for the Guardian reference. I would have thought the Queen Mother made it clear who should have the use of Birkhall, but Prince Philip and Princess Elizabeth did use it while her father was alive. So perhaps Philip wanted to return and make it a guest house or hunting lodge. Intriguing little sentence.

Somewhere below there is a comment about the Queen setting up trust funds for her children when they were born. That would be one way to provide for them without causing a death tax. The Queen Mother's entire estate, mostly art works and riddled with debts, went to the Queen, and the Queen's entire estate will probably go to Charles. She can gift things during her lifetime.

I'm at a loss for why discussing a subject makes one jealous anymore than praising something makes one fatuous. A blog is here for the purpose of discussion.

The subject of the expenses and privileges of the monarchy is certainly a reasonable one, especially when it is sometimes claimed that William and Kate are living a "normal" life. William and Kate are not living a normal life even by the standards of the wealthy.

There has been some unpleasant publicity in the last couple of days about long-time royal retainers being laid off and forced to find new homes (since housing is part of the job benefits.) This has been said to be done because of budget cuts the queen has been forced to make. So the expenses of the lifestyle of her family is certainly news.

I think there are few people on this blog who wouldn't be happy to have a rent-free luxury flat in London decorated at our whim but I doubt many of us are actually overcome with jealously about not having it - (Although I wouldn't have Anmer on a bet - that house has very bad karma to my way of thinking.) There was much discussion about the perks members of Parliament receive a while back - and no one thought anyone "jealous" for raising the issue. William and Kate are not private individuals - their role exists at the will of the people and the details of that role are a perfectly appropriate subject matter.

Great Post! I love Kate Loves, and this one is perfect especially during the slow time. Hopefully they release new pictures soon, maybe after Harry meets get! When do you think the baptism is? I forget, how lo g did they wait to baptize Georgie??

Hi Emily. They baptized PG on Oct. 23, so if they do the same it would be August. It will be interesting to see what they do because the Queen traditionally vacations during August and September. Maybe a late July baptism?

The little village of Anmer is truly idyllic. I'm in love with all those beautiful English villages. What treasures!

Thanks for including Harry's interview. It was wonderful! What a personable young man! While I'd adore a similar interview with Kate and William, I don't think it's likely to happen anytime soon. I deem Harry a much more extroverted "people person" than William, who seems much more reserved. And I think Kate is very shy--charmingly so! It's rather poignant really that two people who really do not seek or relish fame have been cast into such a public role.

Thank you Charlotte. I love your Kate loves posts. This one was most informative. I am longing for a picture of Princess Charlotte with her brother Prince George. I can't believe we waited so long for the birth and she is over 2 weeks old already.

Lovely post, Charlotte! Thank you for all of your research and wonderful photos. I can see why the Cambridges want to spend time here. It looks idyllic. Am I the only one who thinks the wooden fence doesn't look very secure? It says electric fence, but I have never seen a wooden electric fence. There are so many crazy people out there. Even the queen had an intruder at Buckingham Palace. Maybe I'm being a "nervous Nellie" for no reason. :-)

I'm sure that a residence meant to be the permanent home for the next few years of two future Kings is properly secured. If Bucklebury, a non-royal residence, can be secure enough for the Cambridges, I'm sure Anmer has all the necessary security measures and then some. Another important thing to remember is that MOST security threats to the royal family are not from terrorists, groups with political motivations etc., but rather, from individuals who have developed an unhealthy obsession with someone in the royal family. These individuals usually don't have very sophisticated plans, and don't usually present a huge threat. And for the larger groups who may be threats, it is really up to intelligence agencies, not the actual security details, to foil potential plots. It's the same way for politicians around the world. Security details/features are meant as a last resort for stopping an attack, only if all other efforts have failed. But really, they will probably have an armed patrol on their property at all times, aside from their own personal security details inside the house. The house itself is probably like a bunker, with bullet-proof windows, etc. No doubt they also have a panic room. And the area above their house is a no-fly zone. I'd say if we want to worry about security, it should be for the billions of men and women who don't have the efforts of hundreds dedicated towards ensuring their security.

LOL anon#99!!! You made me discover another fun British popular rhyme. I have a friend living in London and I told him how fond I am of Royal Family and of this blog. He was astonished, he couldn't understand why. Hehe, he didn't imagine how many things I can learn here... with three men in a tub...

Paola-2200-I must share honors for that rhyme remark with whomever suggested that the candlestickmaker was among the 1900 invited to W&k's wedding, as the butcher and baker were reportedly guests. ha!On a previous post.

Paola-04:14- My goodness. I was trying to be humble.Give credit where due. Sorry to be confusing.From reading your comments, I would say you have already learned a great deal. Blogging in a foreignlanguage is both a difficult and a brave accomplishment.

I'm afraid the paps are already aware of it. William was photographed cycling about six weeks ago close to Anmer. The photos were published in an Australian magazine https://www.pinterest.com/pin/128634133083639035/

Yes, Bluhare: I meant that maybe those photos of a cycling William have been "too much" for the Cambridges, making them write to paparazzi (I laugh each time I read paparazzi, it's an Italian word and it sounds quite funny).

CharlotteDo you know if there are schools the children of William and Catherine could attend in the area of Anmer Hall? If not they would need to move back to London in a few years. I am assuming there is something at least through age 10 to 12 that would work in the area, but it is complicated having a student for any school that requires heightened security. Thank you for any information you might have. Ali

I spoke to a few of the royal commentators and they all said William hopes to remain working in Norfolk for "several years". Of course, this is all depending on Her Majesty's health continuing to be as good as it has been.

There's been talk of George attending a pre-school or nursery close to Anmer, and again, should The Queen continue at the pace she is, I think it's a very likely possibility.

Speaking of HM, there's plans underway for a fabulous 90th celebration next year, we'll most likely see W, K and H attending.

Love checking this blog and finding a new post :-) Always an interesting read! Can not wait to catch our first glimpse of the new family of 4. Hopefully a one off snap is presented before little ones Christening.. Wishful thinking!

I don't mind waiting if it means Charlotte loses a bit more of the wrinkled baby look and we can get a better glimpse at her true features :) I also have my fingers crossed that a professional photographer takes the pics this time!

Im hoping for professional photos this time too. I appreciated the "family album" pictures of George but felt that we really couldn't see him much better than we did at the hospital. I thought the professional shots of PG released before Christmas were gorgeous.

I have a feeling it will be the same scenario. If they had a professional photographer take the photos this time, it would be the equivalent of stating that Michael Middleton didn't do a good job last time. And then there's the first born vs. second born argument that would come up. Yikes. :)

If I'm wrong I will eat one of Camilla's huge hats, but I think Michael Middleton will take the photographs.

As I said on the previous post. I hope Harry take them. He published some pictures on their Instagram from NZ recently and you can see him with a ccamera alot. It would be a nice way to keep it non-professional and in the family without giving fuel to the "the middletons are too involved" argument :P

Oh Royalfan, that would be a sight to see but those feathers would tickle. Please do chose the black feathered one though - I'm so weary of that "look at me, pleeze!" hat showing up at funerals.

I rather hope they choose a better photographer because the pictures are historic but I do see your point. How grudging they are with photos - after all there is no reason why they couldn't have some professional photos and some family-taken ones too.

I've just been reading The Glass of Fashion by Cecil Beaton (really recommend it) and it reminded me that Prince Philip fancied himself something of a photographer too and dared to ask some impertinent questions about why Beaton was taking photos in a certain way - and was told off in no uncertain terms. Those were the days of real royal photography. I remember thinking when I was a child that I was looking at real fairy princesses.

I am afraid there isn't much of a village to visit. Just a few houses and farms. But the area is stunningly beautiful. English countryside as you would imagine it. Very picturesque. And there are beautiful parks around the Sandringham Estate and cute little town. Norfolk is definitely worth a visit.

I spent some of the afternoon reading about the underground remnants of the medieval village that lie right around Anmer Hall and St. Mary's Church. They are in a park that is preserved as a historically important area. Maybe there will be archaeology in the area.

At certain times of the year, you can visit the house at Sandringham, Try yo visit in June when the rhododendrons are in bloom - which can vary a bit year by year. There are wonderful churches in the area such as Walpole St. Peter's and Terrington St. Clement the ones at Swaffham and March as well. And the fens are a wonder to see. You should read the Nine Tailors by Dorothy Sayers for a feel for the area.

Paola, from what I remember hearing, it's made from copper and will fade with age. I think I also remember reading that the "neighbors" think it's really bright, too. But, it will fade and probably last forever, right? Good investment, and they'll get used to it.

No, it's not copper, it's clay. I think that a long time will pass before it will look less bright. But, in my opinion, it is better to employ those tiles instead of artificially made looking older ones.

The cover of The English Garden magazine for July shows a hall with very similar bricks and roof, the roof tiles in the process of turning darker. Unfortunately, no image of that cover seems to be online as yet.

These clay tiles are called pantiles. They are characteristic of buildings in eastern England. The short Wikipedia article about them includes a couple of pictures in various stages of darkening. Interesting that they are a lighter form of roofing that can be used on roofs with a low pitch.

Charlotte has actually provided a picture of a darkening pantile roof, above, on the the middle brick building in the village of Snettisham. The carstone used to build Anmer Hall is also interesting, and characteristic of old Norfolk buildings. It is a type of sandstone. Apparently the front of the building, like the driveway side, was carstone until it was covered or replaced with brick early in the 19th century.

Carstone, I think in Italian is something like "arenaria". It's similar to "pietra serena" which is typical of florentine architecture. A very classical, not expensive but traditional and beautiful stone. The mix of "arenaria" and bricks is also frequent in Italy, not in Florence but in Milan (where I am living). In Milan we have another kind of arenaria, called "beola".

this is my first comment on your blog. I really appreciate all your posts that I follow regularly from Italy.Thank you for this wonderful job!

I have a question: is it known whether Prince George's nanny speaks to him in Spanish? I am myself a big advocate of bilingualism from early age and I think this is a great opportunity for the young Prince - and possibly his sister - to pick up a second language without any particular effort.Just curious...

Unfortunately we don't know that info, but I do know Maria has been a wonderful addition to the household. She's spoken so highly of and has been an invaluable help. It would be wonderful for George to learn as much as possible at a young age and I think Maria will be an important part in this.

I had actually wondered if part of the reason they wanted this Nanny was her Spanish to help the kids grow up bilingual? ;) I actually thought that might be why W and C hired her over a British Nanny. Ali

I will concur with my fellow blog commenters ~ a new post on Duchess Kate excites me so much and makes my day. This post about Anmer Hall and the picturesque town in Norfolk was lovely and it made me yearn to live in a similar place and wonder what it would be like to live in such a quaint village. I think it would be fabulous!! Thank you very much Charlotte for this wonderful post and for keeping us engaged as we wait for photos of the family or a Kate sighting. Looking forward to Kate Loves too!!

PS- Do you know if Kate ever reads your blog? I can't help but wonder if she does~ just out of curiosity....we are such a great set of fans and support for her and her work.

It wouldn't surprise me if their PR staff, or even Rebecca or her PA (Natasha, I think?), read some blogs/comments occasionally, in order to get an idea of people's thoughts. I imagine Kate has been taught to try and stay away from reading stuff about herself, especially the comments (vs. actual articles or blog posts), since comments on many newspapers and some blogs can get quite harsh (yes, I know many think that about my comments on this blog, lol). Kate was spotted once buying a magazine that had a cover story about her, but I THINK that was pre-marriage, and at that point she didn't have a large staff to do that for her. Also, frankly, I bet she was more worried about her public image then because she hadn't married William yet and was worried about negative publicity derailing their relationship. I get the sense that now that she has William and has fulfilled her heir and spare obligations, she probably feels more secure in her position and cares less about public opinion. And that's the healthier thing to do. While it is very important for royals to have a sense of public opinion about them, it can't be good for them to read every single comment.

First, thank you so much, Charlotte, for yet another wonderful and informative post that helps us understand Kate's life without being too intrusive. Personally, I can't imagine such a rural life for anything other than a vacation, but I can imagine how a family who is so desperately seeking privacy could love it. I wish Kate and William all the best in raising their two children.

Second, I began this discussion on the previous post and wanted to continue it now because yet another person above has said that people who live in the US and don't pay taxes in Britain shouldn't get to criticize the royal family. Here's a few reasons I respectfully think that argument is not a valid one.

1. Why should people from the US get to praise Kate, but not criticize her? If people who don't pay taxes to subsidize her living can't criticize, then it makes sense that they shouldn't get an opinion at all. Yet no one ever tells Americans who praise Kate that they can't have an opinion. That's hypocritical - judgment is judgment, regardless of if it is positive or negative.

2. Yes, people should not solely focus on the problems of another nation, since all nations have their own problems. That being said, no American on this blog has acted like they only care about problems in the Britain, while ignoring problems in the US. Borders are just borders - they are arbitrarily drawn and don't necessarily mean anything. I DO think it is valid to say that perhaps an American cannot entirely understand WHY the British royal family is so important to England, but to say they cannot have an opinion at all is silly. After all, should no one should ever care if there is a dictator killing millions in another country? That seems like a bad policy, since sometimes, outsiders need to intervene and stop the problem. I AM hesitant when it comes to western nations criticizing nations from other areas of the world, since those criticisms are usually steeped in racism. But I don't really think that problem holds for Americans criticizing someone in Britain. Obviously the cultures are not the same, but there are enough similarities. I think it is much more problematic for William to get involved in conservation efforts in Africa, because they have seriously hurt subsistence farmers in many nations who depend on hunting for their livelihoods, something that United for Wildlife has ignored because of cultural differences. But as long as the royal family sees fit for themselves to get involved in efforts in non-British nations, I see no reason why then, non-British people cannot have opinions on this same family that obviously thinks borders are not important for having opinions.

3. One of the biggest arguments for why the British family is worth the taxpayer money spent on them is that they bring in billions in tourism. Tourism...i.e. money spent by people from OTHER COUNTRIES. If people really followed this idea that people from other nations cannot have opinions on the royal family, then the Windsors would lose their best financial argument for their existence.

4. All nations are interconnected in some way (the US was once a British colony, Kate and William have made two visits to the US), and so to say that we shouldn't get an opinion just because we are technically not taxpayers in a nation is a very over-simplified way of looking at the world. In fact, many would say that closing yourself off from the rest of the world is actually a very un-intelligent thing to do, because we should be aware of what is going on around the world, because it all can affect us. Closing yourself off from international affairs only promotes ignorance and close-mindedness.

Good for you! The repeated comments about non-English posters is mean. Funnily enough one of the posters I have seen saying it is now popping up on an American blog. I don't think it's right to say someone cannot express an opinion because of nationality- that's discriminatory. Thank you Maggie for speaking up and Charlotte for publishing the comment.

With William's trust monies he could afford to live in Amner Hall. Like the other commenter said, if a cabinet maker can afford to live there should be easy for William with his pilot's salary and trust monies. He doesn't just have his pilots salary.

As a non-British poster, I cannot but enjoy the answer of Maggie! I hope that my respectful opinions and questions will not be rejected from this brilliant forum... also if I find that the roof is too red... ;)

Oddly enough, some people think this is a place to exchange ideas and have a discussion. The definition of comment: a written remark expressing an opinion. The word rebuttal means: a reply to find fault in an argument.

As for the remarks regarding William's housing we've narrowed it down to:1. Someone with an RAF and pilot's salary wouldn't be able to afford to live there.2. Someone with an RAF and pilot's salary with family trust funds WOULD be able to afford to live there.3. Someone with an RAF and pilot's salary with family trust funds whose Grandmother is the Queen and owns the property WOULD definitely be able to afford to live there and without paying rent/mortgage and tax free too.

Number 3 is the lifestyle of William and Kate. Ergo, why the topic is being discussed.

Maggie, I always appreciate your comments. They are very well thought-out and you handle people attacking you so well. I just want you to know that your comments are appreciate :). And I always look forward to them, even if I don't always agree, you at least make me think. In this case, you are spot on! so thank you

Lol, Maggie, some people just don't like being either proven wrong or criticized. Therefore their only defense is a dig at the commenter they don't agree with instead of just backing up their comment with a rational thought. I am not worried about your ego :)

...and some people refuse to admit when they've been proven wrong and seemingly think that saying their opinion loudly and often makes it fact. "Agreeing with" connotes opinion;there is a difference between offering an opinion and stating opinion as fact. Some people don't see the difference, unfortunately.:)

Lovely post! Sounds like an idyllic place to raise their children. Thank you, Charlotte for always being spot on, and never posting those terrible rumors, which always turn out to be false. And, you do it in such a charming way.

On the subject of Women's Institute. You might enjoy the new british tv drama 'Home Fires' http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/tv-and-radio-reviews/11578369/Home-Fires-episode-one-review.htmlIt's the story of women in rural England at the onset of WWII and the local branch of the WI is their hub for social and political activities. Beautiful british period drama! I saw the first three episodes and enjoyed it tremendously. How to they do it so well over and over again?! Honestly, I am hooked already. Again. You may stumble across the occasional Downton Abbey actresses.

Wills pilot income minus taxes and whatever else is deducted, is being donated to charity. This has been stated publicly by the press office. So they live off the interest from diana inheritance, money he inherited from the queen mum, the $300 ,000 the queen set aside for each of her grandchildren (when they were born) to be invested and used when they come of age, and the money allotted by the duchy (POW). The duchy income number has varied when reported.

It should also be noted Harry has the same plus a "substantial" amount received from Dianas father when Harry was born. Diana used the term "substantial" because her father knew that William would be the wealthier of the brothers when he becomes king.

The family obviously takes care of those who are not going to work for a salary. This has occurred as far back as the queens generation. The Duke of Gloucester worked as an architect until his older brother William (wills namesake) died in an air accident i believe in 1972. He resigned from the architectural firm and increased his royal duties.

The royals are criticized either way not working for a salary and living off an inheritance or taking a job with a salary away from someone who needs it. William and presumably Harry, will take jobs with salaries (outside of the traditional army jobs). This has never been done before, so we will see if this social experiment succeeds. Only "secondary" royals (Timothy Lawrence, peter/zara Phillips, princess Alexandra husband, etc, have had jobs in the past.

Would post with my name, but can't get that part to work if someone cares to explain it lol.

Sorry to hijack the post, but this money bit needed some clarity. First line royals working outside of the army is definitely uncharted territory.

How very interesting, unintentional Anonymous. That makes a lot of sense.For me, this highlights the point that William and Kate are probably able to cover their expenses like any other wealthy family who lives of the proceeds of their inherited fortune. But I think it's hard for most of us bystanders to understand what belongs to their private assets and what has to do with their role as royals and might be publicly funded. It can look quite muddled up and I can imagine it cause some frustration among the british population. Maybe only real insiders know where the line is drawn.

So, what are we exactly talking about? The accumulation of private property and if that's ethically less questionable for a non royal then it is for a royal?

The idea of "private" property for the royal family is questionable, IMO. I don't understand how the concept of 'private' applies to them independent of their status. For example, the royals are given large amounts of jewelry and other very valuable items when they are on tour. Is this 'private' ? Would they be given these gifts if they were NOT representing the British people? The fact that Camilla was given a giant parure of rubies and diamonds, probably worth millions of pounds by the royal family of Brunei or Dubai or some such Middle Eastern oil-rich state - is this to be considered private ? Now, I know that there are some gifts that are considered to belong to the Crown - but there are some that have been clearly stated to be private. Where do they draw this line?

I don't know...

When I am invited to speaking engagements I am given "gift" - but they are usually things like a pen or a plaque or something token, worth less than $100 typically. I am not allowed to accept anything worth more than that. When gifts worth millions are given to people on account of their professions, they are usually forbidden to accept such gifts on account of conflict of interest. The royal family is exempt from such a requirement. Is this ethical ?

Secondly, when it comes to land... how was land procured by the royal family ? How was cash procured by the family to buy Balmoral and Sandringham ? How did they tax the British people and the colonies to procure this cash that they subsequently used to buy these properties ? How did they use the feudal system to their advantage to enrich themselves? After all, they did not enrich themselves through skills, through brawn or brains... they enriched themselves by virtue of their birth. So, is their wealth the same as the wealth I inherited from my grandfather who built a business ground up?

I am not proposing that these properties be seized and history rewritten, but one really has to educate oneself about the wrongs perpetrated through history and then try to understand the concept of 'private property' in that context.

It is all fine and good to love the royal family. But we must also be cognizant of the history behind them.

Anon 17:41- what if your grandfather had leveraged out his partner and forced him to sell. Would you thenrefuse to accept your legacy? Or what if that transaction had happened centuries ago and your ancestorshad occupied and passed on the legacy from generation to generation. Would you refuse your share of thebusiness because of something that happened hundreds of years ago? Should your grandfather be considered unworthy of this legacy and kept from passing it on to his descendants? Should you be judgedless worthy-or whatever it is you are saying about the royal family- because of what that long ago ancestor did?

IMO, there is no great difference between your inherited wealth from your grandfather's business and a inherited wealth from a grand-grand-grand father who was able and clever enough to become the king of Britain, and from all the kings and queens that were able enough to maintain their crown avoiding to be thrown away – as for instance it happened in Italy to the Savoia family, or in France or in other countries to other royal families. I think that all those royal people of England made a remarkable work.

I'm not Charlotte and obviously not nearly as knowledgable, I bet they won't be there much, if at all. They know that if they show up to Wimbledon a bunch, people will be wanting to know why Kate can't start doing appearances again. And, I get the feeling they want to be in London as little as possible anyways.

I think she may be a bit stir crazy at Anmer Hall with the kids and happy to "hop" out for an outing or two. It is very different with your second, one is just as invested as with the first but you recognize the importance of taking time away to recharge. She clearly has gone into this second pregnancy better prepared, she also is older and may find the isolation of Anmer a bit much, ones views change quickly at the ages she and William are at. My may concern with Anmer is I do not see any support group of other Mums to hang out with or talk to while the kids are playing on the swing sets. It just looks very isolated if you are not working outside the home or working the land. I know she has aids and staff but that is different. Maybe I am wrong, do she and William have friends to hang out with who are within 15 minutes of them at Anmer?? Ali

I agree with Maggie, if they do attend any matches it will be very few. I hope that their PR team would be able to spot the hypocracy of Kate attending lots of matches while remaining on materity leave.

Yet, I wonder when do we expect Kate's maternity leave to end. I know that she it taking a longer one than with George so does that mean she'll return to duties in September/October or even later? November is such an important month with Rememberance Day and such so I hope that she'll return to royal duties before then. Or maybe she'll do visits sporadically until then and then return to her previous frequency in November. But December and January are often slow for royal duties so will it be actually February until Kate fully returns from maternity leave?

As for the events in June, I doubt we'll see Kate at HM garden Party but maybe Order of the Garder.

I read the post that was removed (in my inbox). All I can say is that being on maternity leave doesn't mean a woman is bedridden or housebound. A colleague of mine will be on maternity leave from mid June to mid September. Would anyone begrudge her a trip to the beach or (gasp) a vacation during this time? :) It's leave from work: it does not dictate what you can and cannot do.

women on maternity leave cannot attend tennis matches? Is there alist of activities allowed and not allowed? Sorry, I must have missed the memo. Not allowed a tennis match while on maternity leave? really????

Does anyone know if there is a traditional gift for the second baby? I know with a first child it is normal to give an eternity band, which Will did give to Kate. I am just wondering if we might have any idea what he will give Kate this time? Any thoughts? :)

Have you guys seen the " why kate is the prickly princess" articles? I have thought all along kate and will must have an understanding (or actual written agreement) on what Kate will or won't do. What do all think ? Is an heir and a spare plus a few engagements it?

Charlotte thanks for this interesting post. It was very welcome after a long day at work and all the chaos of a busy family to be able to just sit and read about Anmer Hall & its history. I hope that the Cambridges can take as long as they need to get their family settled. I'm hoping you're right Charlotte & Kate does pop up at these activities as it's likely to mean that things are going well.

I agree with anon at 21:10 that William is breaking new ground in his work with the air ambulance. When Prince Edward & Sophie worked the tabloid press were relentless in their criticism. Sophie wore the brunt of it and it ended badly with the 'sheik' affair. While the same conflict of interest claims can't be levelled at William the DM et al will no doubt have their chequebooks out for any co-worker or patient who wants to talk. So kudos to William for persisting & balancing it with his royal duties - he's done a few in the last day or so. Loved the photo with the tiny t-shirt for Charlotte.

I think these brief, unsourced opinion pieces are extremely silly. And they are both unkind and disrespectful of a new mother who is taking care of the young family necessary to the monarchy, and warmly welcomed by her and her husband. She gets no credit for all the work she did before Charlotte was born, for her involvement with her charities, for the long tours she has made, for her consistent appearances at events attended by the royal family, or even for renovating royal properties that needed it! The guesses about William's income are just that. None of this has any factual foundation. One wonders what pleasure anyone derives from mocking Catherine, who cannot reply.

ANON 21:42I agree. Yes, it is a blog about her lifestyle, but being so consistently critical as many are on this blog seems mean spirited and non-consequential.I think she has adjusted nicely and is making worthwhile contributions.I think history will end up favoring William and Kate and their childrenregardless of her current critics.

Comments are most welcome! Constructive discussion is always encouraged but off topic or hateful remarks will not be published.

We ask you use a name when posting (a pseudonym such as the name of a royal you like or anything you wish). If you do not wish to use the sign in options, simply select the "Name/URL" option on the drop down menu and insert your name, and if you wish the country/state you're from. You can leave the URL blank.

If there are a large number of comments, it is necessary to click the 'Load More' button at the end of the comments section to see the latest additions.