Redlands2030 supports the need to improve transparency and accountability in local government in Queensland.

Redlands2030 has published a case study Mayor Williams gets a mysterious gift which explains how the public was unaware for nearly four years that Mayor Karen Williams had received $5,000 from an interstate developer who had at least two significant dealings with Redland City Council.

The different and inadequate reporting obligations of the Local Government Act 2009 and the Local Government Electoral Act 2011 made it possible for the public to be kept in the dark about this matter.

The weblink for this case study written by Redlands2030 is: http://redlands2030.net/mysterious-donation/

It is disappointing that the Government’s bill does not give effect to two of the CCC’s recommendations, namely:

Recommendation 5

That the Government expand the regulation of donations to include the expenditure of donations and a requirement to account for unspent donations by either only using the funds for campaign purposes or transferring them to a registered charity.

Recommendation 6

That the Government strengthen the obligation upon councillors, chief executive officers and senior executive employees (relevant persons) to declare funds, gifts or benefits provided to another entity which could be perceived to provide the relevant person with a benefit.

The Committee should consider amendments to the bills which give effect to CCC recommendations numbers 5 and 6.

The gift and donation disclosure threshold should be $200

The CCC recommended that the disclosure thresholds in the Local Government Act 2009 and the Local Government Electoral Act 2011 be aligned at $500 which is the gift disclosure threshold in the Local Government Act.

It would be more transparent to align the reporting requirements by adopting the $200 donation disclosure threshold in the Local Government Electoral Act.

For comparison, in the USA the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) requires candidates to file periodic reports disclosing the money they raise and spend including all receipts and expenditures exceeding $200 per election cycle.

The FECA disclosure rules are summarised on the Federal Election Commission’s website: http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/fecfeca.shtml

It’s time to ban donations from property developers

In addition to adopting the CCC’s recommendations (but with a $200 disclosure threshold) the Committee should also consider a ban on political donations from property developers.

Australians’ trust in government has fallen over the past year from 45% to 37% according to a recent survey.

Improving the transparency of the election process at all levels of government will help fix this alarming trust deficit.

Submissions should be emailed to:

Research Director

Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources Committee

Parliament House

George Street

Brisbane Qld 4000

via email: ipnrc@parliament.qld.gov.au

Closing date for written submissions is Monday 30 January 2016 at 10.00am.

One thought on “Local government electoral laws – submission”

Transparency and accountability be it local or State government after 30 years of watching on the sidelines in Capalaba, I’d like to see that! For starters, last local election sitting Mayor received $10,000 from JJRichards Waste Co. for starters. Local wealthy developers are generous too. But…believe that the more things change, the more they stay the same. Who is to know what is handed to pollies to ‘grease the palm’ under the table. Maha Sinnathamby openly admitted to doing so in order to get what he wanted….and is to be admired as in a short space of time, he built the City of Springfield.