My thoughts exactly. But they didn't seem to get such an option. Even if they did, it probably wouldn't change much. Maybe if character traits were added, which are the most important imho, then the results would be different. At least I hope so.

Just so long as she's at least 13 because that's the age of.........Oh wait. Because you aren't Japanese and your some "barbaric" foreigner(like some of the Japanese like to term us), you have no other legal option but to embrace love with 2D lolis and high school tweens. Its better than 3D anyway.

This is invalid to men who have 8" dicks because money means nothing if you can use your tool good, and don't blow like a premas'. Women always talk about you if your GREAT at sex, so even if you do break up... there is always more around the corner after all. Most women friends always try to fuck their boyfriends friend... this is why you can trust women in America.

I think women in each region also have compatible length for dick. 8" dick for japan women with clash and bleed they vagina it more painful then feel good. I read it for newspaper don't ask for any proof.

As much I hate women like them, I have to face reality and see that love isn't what it used to be.

“A hot guy with no cash isn’t trying hard enough!”

My sister married a poor musician who is perhaps the most awesome guy I've met and she's happy with him. They're not rolling in money, but they love each other.What I've noticed is that love to these women is no longer about two sides helping each other grow and to feel for one another. Love is now about supporting the other person and doing everything while they just sit back and do nothing. I want to live with someone I love, not be chained to another person's wishes and no man should ever let a woman treat them like that, no woman should let a man treat them like that either. I would rather live and die unmarried then live in the torment of my own anguish, knowing that I'm only living a lie. That's love these days people...a lie. Women like them are the reason falling in love is so hard in the first place...

you are fucking damn right!! nor wealth, nor looks are the key to a marriage to work, it's the true and honest desire of both parts to help each other, to be there for and support each other, no matter what... when you find a person who cares about you and who you care about too, and both of you make their best for the relationship to improve each day, then and only then you can talk about love

@anon 19:10
i guess you dont know how economies work in post industrial nations... good luck getting a job that pays a ton, you would have to be in the top .01% of the population to get a job that pays enough so you can even begin to think about the possibility of doing what you want.

the question should have been worded differently, should have been love vs money, not looks vs money...

in marriage, love, friendship and devotion are most important, money is just extra icing on the cake.

A relationship is about two individuals relating as two individuals. But people are brainwashed with all those superficial ideas of romance that they don't understand that.

In this world, lots of men are only interested in sex while lots of women are interested in money, but then who've said that the best things in life are easy to reach? You can blame men to be superficial, you can blame women to be superficial, yet it's up to you to decide how you want to see the world.

Billions of people are together despite not having a lot of money. This may come as a shock to some, but most people are NOT rich... Blaming women on love not being what it used to be is plain stupid as men are just as a big a culprit (OMG men can be shallow, NO!)

"Love" isn't dead, love in the respect you surely must mean was never alive. There has never been only 1 reason to be together. Though love is the noble and surely the most common reason in western society now adays, it used to be a tie between families, combining wealth and so on. If anything love is MORE what is should be now than it "used to be".

Read your history. Moving on, why do so many of you feel hurt by this? Are you all handsome poor people?

Suzumiya-san said that "the feelings of love is like a temporary lapse in judgement... kinda like mental illness...Even I get in the mood for that stuff now and then. I am a healthy girl, my body has its urges. But I won't let a momentary slip up leave me with a burden"

Love is but a spice in life for the bread that is sustenance (in most case, money). One certainly cannot live by eating spices alone, but i doubt someone who eats bland bread without spices every single day can be happy throughout their life.

Indeed. As a guy who changed quite a few jobs in different European nations and looked at quite a few job adds i realized that except rare high paying jobs with specific strict criteria of what experience and studies you must have(usually you don't start most jobs with a high position), all the other jobs always prefer young women. Hell even just women are better for them than hiring a male.
If you are a young male and you lose your job, even if you are willing to do anything you will still not find a job immediately while a young woman can find a relatively decent job the next day.
So here is my request to women, if you want us to support you and use us like ATM then get the fuck out of the employment circle so our life can get easier on making money.
Seriously their demands are ridiculous in our days considering we have to fight them also when trying to find a good job. They wanted equality. Well we want it too.

well, technically EVERYBODY, not just women, are easily manipulated. Businesses do it in several different ways people don't even notice! Governments of all variety deploy tons of little details from little "catch" words they use (the tax cut is one of the better known ones)to laws that their creators can claim do things they don't. Honestly though, I believe that relationships based on manipulation and deceit aren't long lasting ones, or if they are, they aren't "happy" long lasting relationships.

I know this from the other side. They don't want young women because they could get pregnant and stay home. They don't want mothers with children because children could get sick and a mother could stay home with them because of it.
The world of work is unfair, deal with it. It's difficult for everyone.
Moreover, on one hand, you guys rant that women are gold-diggers. On the other, you're telling them to get out of their jobs. So choose already or stop complaining.
And yes, some people have ridiculous demands but those aren't stupid women, those are stupid people.

I don't know what terrible bizarro realm you live in, but everything Rena said about young women and mothers not being favored in job hiring is true where I live as well. I've spoken with business owners who happened to be part time teachers and they say the same thing- they don't want to hire them because the children may make her miss work, or she could very well get pregnant if she's recently married and viola- tons of paid time off AND the company has to hire someone to take her spot while she's out.

So clearly, you must be blind. Or just looking at the wrong place for jobs.

Of course, I agree with that. I don't approve of women taking men as wallets, even less when they earn their own money already.

"Reality" you're talking about applies on your country and few others, not for the whole world. For example, where I live this works different.
Here, when you could get pregnant or you have kids as a woman, you're unwanted material - thus my young women employment argument. I couldn't imagine for it to be different in other countries so, my bad. Here, in some work fields, women are still paid less than men for the same job.
There were also no women rushing to work aggressively in my country in the past. Not so long ago, we were a communist country and everybody had to work, no matter what sex you were, otherwise you were arrested. The economic was driven by state. If I remember correctly, there were also no such things like equality or feministic movements. Women just learned to take care of themselves and to be independent. It's not very common to see such things as housewives here.
Here, only spoiled brats wait what their husbands/boyfriends give them and want to be taken care of.
Of course I know I can't apply this on every state. Especially because we're such a weird country with weird past.
So yeah, I agree that each woman should choose if she wants to sit home and being taken care of or work and being independent, not try to be both at the same time.

Of course, if the economy works that way where you live, then it really doesn't help the whole situation.
The fact that government is doing everything except for supporting families is somewhat common knowledge these days. Here it isn't much better, everything is damn expensive, supporting your family alone is unthinkable. However, I don't think you can stop increasing prices in any way, with women in workforce or without them. But I'm not really interested in economy that much to be able to tell, I admit.

I don't think you got my point Rena. If women weren't in the workforce i will gladly accept that i have to share my money with her, but from the moment she was to be viewed as equal in the employment market as well, she should stop searching for me(or any man) taking care of her.

And since you are a woman i have to tell you that women made no favors to themselves by entering so aggressively in the employment market. At first it looked ideal even for their husbands, they worked got money and the husbands didn't had to give as much at every thing their wifes wanted since they could buy staff for themselves. For women it worked even better. They didn't have to ask their husband and they felt more free and their money worked like extra cash since the man payed for the family expenses and they mostly used their money for personal purchases. It also gave them more freedom to live alone.
Unfortunately for wifes and husbands world over the governments and corporations saw a golden opportunity to make more money out of the money women started earning and they even started to push the idea of women in the workforce but for anything else than their love of equal rights and freedom to women.

Resold?
The prices risen and taxes risen to a level that a family to get by, has to use both salaries. Do you honestly think that if women weren't part of the workforce the price of life would be the same?
I assure that it wouldn't, everything will have been priced under the assumption than a family has one and single income.
Anyway, today for the couple not needing money from both parties, one of the two must have a very high paying job. This resolds in women asking for rare men with very high paying jobs because a normal salary is not good anymore in supporting more that one person.

Don't get me wrong i don't think women shouldn't have the right of employment and we should go back at men ruling all income. I just think it was badly and terribly executed. Our disgusting capitalistic system destroyed the dream of nice equality completely. The way it is now, it works against women and men and especially against families as a whole.

As about young women employment. I don't know what you are talking about. Ether you don't know what you talk about or i am blind, because i have todays city newspaper in-frond of me and only a look at the first page of employment adds i found 15 jobs asking for strictly young women and only 2 jobs for a man or woman. You logic about pregnancy is nice and all but it means shit when the reality is right here in my hand and seems different.