Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

The Rich May Vote Democrat This Election

There is a stereotype that the rich consistently vote Republican, motivated by the lure of promises of tax cuts and false promises of "smaller government." Like all stereotypes, it has never been completely true, but some conjecture that it will definitely not be true in the 2016 election cycle where Donald Trump and the party base he now defines are driving many Republicans from the party fold. A piece in the New York Times looks at the phenomenon and analyzes why the GOP is losing support among those often viewed as the most dependable of voters. Here are highlights:

For the first time in decades, the wealthy are set to deliver a
landslide victory for a Democratic presidential candidate.

While polling data on the
rich is imprecise given their small population, polls of the top-earning
households favor Hillary
Clinton over Donald
J. Trump two to one. The July Affluent Barometer survey by Ipsos found that among voters earning more than $100,000
a year — roughly the top 25 percent of households — 45 percent said they
planned to vote for Mrs. Clinton, while 28 percent planned to vote for Mr.
Trump. The rest were undecided or planned to vote for another candidate.

The spread was even wider
among the highest earners. For those earning $250,000 or more — roughly the top
5 percent of households — 53 percent planned to vote for Mrs. Clinton while 25
percent favored Mr. Trump.

[I]f
the numbers hold, historians and wealth experts say that next month’s elections
may prove to be the largest vote by the wealthy for a Democratic candidate in
recent history.

The
big question is whether Mrs. Clinton’s potential sweep of the elite represents
a structural shift in the politics and policy preferences of the wealthy, or simply
a personal aversion to Mr. Trump. Either way, the vote would break decades of
Republican dominance of affluent voters in presidential elections. It would
also shed light on a growing debate about whether the wealthy are tacking to
the left politically as more fortunes are created and concentrated in states
like California and New York and throughout the left-leaning tech industry.

Ipsos
says its data suggests that the affluent are more anti-Trump than pro-Clinton.
. . . “The affluent vote seems to be more about the concerns over Donald Trump
than the enthusiasm for Clinton,” said Stephen Kraus, chief insights officer
and director of the Ipsos Affluent Survey.

The closest comparison to the current election among affluent voters
is the one in 2008, when Barack Obama carried about half of voters who earned
more than $100,000. Yet Mr. Gelman said John McCain still did better among the
rich than the poor, and compared with the broader electorate, the wealthy voted
Republican more often.

In the current election,
Mrs. Clinton is poised to capture a far larger share of the affluent vote than
Mr. Obama. And if the numbers hold, the elite would lean more Democratic than
Republican for the first time in at least 50 years, Mr. Gelman said.

In the current election, of course, neither candidate is publicly
courting the wealth vote. Even Mr. Trump has been labeled a populist. Yet
affluent voters are 15 to 20 percent more likely to vote than the broader
population, according to Ipsos. Their financial support gives the wealthy an
outsize voice in campaigns.

“I don’t
think either candidate wants to be seen as having the support of the 1 percent
right now,” Mr. Kraus said, “even though they are both part of the 1 percent.”

Perhaps part of what is driving the shift is the realization that a Trump presidency would be very bad for the nation and, therefore, bad for the wealthy as well, especially if Trump created economic chaos by starting wars and/or trade wars. Then again, they may want to have nothing to do with the racists, religious fanatics and bigots who now control the GOP base.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.