POLICE have released pictures of two people they believe are responsible for stealing the poppy tins.

Officers say they received a considerable number of calls and now want to talk to Lulia Ghitoi, 33, and Liviu Ghitoi, 22, whose last known address was Barking, east London.

It is not known if they are married or are brother and sister. They are also believed to be responsible a theft from a shop in Whitham.

Another shopkeeper in Derbyshire told the Mirror she was “100% sure” the pair had also snatched her iPhone.

Investigating officer DS Rob Kirby said: "They are also wanted in connection with a theft which occurred in September where a mobile phone was stolen from behind the counter in a shop in Maldon Road, Witham.

"We would also urge any other retailers or shopkeepers who think these two suspects have been in their shops to review their CCTV footage and report any further thefts that come to light.

"We are now appealing to anybody who knows of the whereabouts of either person to contact us. This appeal would include friends and family of the suspects themselves to search their conscience and help us bring to justice the people responsible for this despicable offence where money donated to help war heroes was stolen on the very day dedicated to respecting their memory.”

ITS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN TO OUR BRITISH SOLIDERS IS UN ACEPTABLE BUT HOPEFULLY THE COURTS WILL DECIDE THERE FATE AND I HOPE THEY WILL NOT BE MERCIFIL
IN OTHER COUNTRIES HANDS WOULD COME OFF.

ITS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN TO OUR BRITISH SOLIDERS IS UN ACEPTABLE BUT HOPEFULLY THE COURTS WILL DECIDE THERE FATE AND I HOPE THEY WILL NOT BE MERCIFIL
IN OTHER COUNTRIES HANDS WOULD COME OFF.Shaun Butler

But they were a metaphor for nazism, which may explain their appeal to Rich\Carol et al.

[quote][p][bold]BIRLIS[/bold] wrote:
I'm pretty sure the Daleks weren't from Earth, let alone England.....[/p][/quote]But they were a metaphor for nazism, which may explain their appeal to Rich\Carol et al.Shoebury_Cyclist

I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?

I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?KonArtist

By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.

By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.John T Pharro

KonArtist wrote:
I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?

Elephantman2 won't agree!!

[quote][p][bold]KonArtist[/bold] wrote:
I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?[/p][/quote]Elephantman2 won't agree!!John T Pharro

KonArtist wrote:
I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?

Elephantman2 won't agree!!

Wrong again; if I disagree I'll say so; I don't need you to do it for me. I'm grateful that I live in a country that protects freedom of speech and abides by the rule of law. If it didn't we'ed all be living in a 3rd world country wouldn't we?

[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]KonArtist[/bold] wrote:
I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?[/p][/quote]Elephantman2 won't agree!![/p][/quote]Wrong again; if I disagree I'll say so; I don't need you to do it for me. I'm grateful that I live in a country that protects freedom of speech and abides by the rule of law. If it didn't we'ed all be living in a 3rd world country wouldn't we?Elephantman2

KonArtist wrote:
I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?

Elephantman2 won't agree!!

Wrong again; if I disagree I'll say so; I don't need you to do it for me. I'm grateful that I live in a country that protects freedom of speech and abides by the rule of law. If it didn't we'ed all be living in a 3rd world country wouldn't we?

'Abides by the rule of law". Just wish he would and actually I think he is in breach of the Human Rights Act because everyone has the right to express their views without fear and do you think he does?

[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]KonArtist[/bold] wrote:
I dont know why the police are even bothering posting the pictures up, and echo readers commenting about how low life scum they are etc.. Yes they are low life, and many other people can see that. But the only person who wont be able to see that is the judge. He of course will fall sorry for them. They will be giving a caution, not to bother giving back the stolen goods, and a new 3 bedroom house somewhere in the country to protect them from the community and haters. Anyone agree?[/p][/quote]Elephantman2 won't agree!![/p][/quote]Wrong again; if I disagree I'll say so; I don't need you to do it for me. I'm grateful that I live in a country that protects freedom of speech and abides by the rule of law. If it didn't we'ed all be living in a 3rd world country wouldn't we?[/p][/quote]'Abides by the rule of law". Just wish he would and actually I think he is in breach of the Human Rights Act because everyone has the right to express their views without fear and do you think he does?John T Pharro

Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?

Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?John T Pharro

John T Pharro wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?

I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.

[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?[/p][/quote]I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.Shoebury_Cyclist

John T Pharro wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?

I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.

See Elephantman2 first post.

[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?[/p][/quote]I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.[/p][/quote]See Elephantman2 first post.John T Pharro

John T Pharro wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?

I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.

See Elephantman2 first post.

I meant countries, not Echo commenters.

[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?[/p][/quote]I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.[/p][/quote]See Elephantman2 first post.[/p][/quote]I meant countries, not Echo commenters.Shoebury_Cyclist

John T Pharro wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?

I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.

See Elephantman2 first post.

I meant countries, not Echo commenters.

That confuses me you said "anyone else" so I assumed you missed the post.

[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
Oh and in some counties girls get shot by people full of hate because they want to go to school. So how do you make us the only country in the world that allows people who do good to be despised?[/p][/quote]I don't see anyone else attempting to use the term 'do gooder' as an insult.[/p][/quote]See Elephantman2 first post.[/p][/quote]I meant countries, not Echo commenters.[/p][/quote]That confuses me you said "anyone else" so I assumed you missed the post.John T Pharro

John T Pharro wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.

So what happens then if one parent is one nationality and the other another, then you ARE dual, biologically!

[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.[/p][/quote]So what happens then if one parent is one nationality and the other another, then you ARE dual, biologically!Almeda11

we need to be out of this thing called europe by 31dec13 from when the red carpet is rolled out for the romanians and bulgarians. want to know why the european criminal classes end up here? a slap on the back and a nice fat benefits cheque.

we need to be out of this thing called europe by 31dec13 from when the red carpet is rolled out for the romanians and bulgarians. want to know why the european criminal classes end up here? a slap on the back and a nice fat benefits cheque.asbo industries inc

John T Pharro wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.

So what happens then if one parent is one nationality and the other another, then you ARE dual, biologically!

But not dual nationality. However, did not say that the suggestion that it wouldn't throw up some anomalies, but would go a long way to avoiding those that want to pick and chose don't you think.

[quote][p][bold]Almeda11[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.[/p][/quote]So what happens then if one parent is one nationality and the other another, then you ARE dual, biologically![/p][/quote]But not dual nationality. However, did not say that the suggestion that it wouldn't throw up some anomalies, but would go a long way to avoiding those that want to pick and chose don't you think.John T Pharro

Theft is against the law..Theft from any charity is morally wrong.
These people probarly have no regular job/income, unless they are on welfare?!
I did get a little fed up reading the above posting as it was heading away from the issue and more into a slanging match.
why not try to get your opinion/point over in a few lines without attacking each other.
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" Voltaire

Theft is against the law..Theft from any charity is morally wrong.
These people probarly have no regular job/income, unless they are on welfare?!
I did get a little fed up reading the above posting as it was heading away from the issue and more into a slanging match.
why not try to get your opinion/point over in a few lines without attacking each other.
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" Voltairetepluap

Rich\Carol wrote:
I am shocked and surprised that the usual do gooders havnt argued their case and supported these scum. Early days yet and Im waiting for the usual people to say they are English and what about their human rights and Im a racist person.

Bring it on cos these scum pondlife have taken the money for familys and support for British Soldiers who have lost their lives for this country.

Deport them to place of origin , revoke their British passports and lets all wave them goodbye at the airport as these are real scum.

1st offence, BIG WARNING from the magistrate.

First and foremost these individuals are criminals who should be dealt with by the police and the courts. If you'd have stuck to thos efacts instaed of sticking in your bigoted nonsense I wouldn't have felt it neccessary to post anything.

This is the only country I know where people who want to do good are despised by people who are clearly full of hatred.

I am not full of hatred. The problem is our courts do not reflect the abuse that some people who come to this country have for our traditions.
No doubt you think Abu Qatada who preaches hatred of the British and is a dangerous man has every right to stay in the UK. Well I don't and when you cross that line like he has tough if his Country of Origin has the death penalty, gets confessions by torture or not. He should have thought of that before repeatedly preaching hatred if you are a non Muslims.
The same goes for these two and any other who abuse our country.
The Human Rights Act is there to provide protection for genuine people who fear for their lives for the sort of country we are, not as a legal shield to stay here.
Actually had it occurred to you that this is exactly what this man wants to drive a wedge and encourage hatred between people which is exactly why he should be deported.
The French kicked out about 200 of his sort after 9/11 and they signed up,to the Human Rights Act as well. Just their judicial system view their citizens have Human Rights as well.

No you are wrong; I don't think any of that. And actually you have no right to imply or state that that is what I think. It is my right not to be misrepresented by you or anyone else.

So what do you think? Should he be deported or not?
Do you think he is dangerous or not?
Do you think he is exploiting the Human Rights Act or not?
Do you think he wants to engender hatred between Muslims and others or not?
Do you think he should be deported for or not?

I believe you should chill a bit; mind your own business and rest your brain cell.

I suggest you start answering actual question as you got so hot under the collar about implying your answers.

You are no Jeremy Paxton and your questions have nothing to do with this bit of news and I have no desire to pander to your freakish behaviour. What is this McCarthyism on the Echo websiite? Peole like you are as dangerous as people like Abu Qatada. You all pedal intolerance and hatred.

You'll get used to it. This website is full of scared, hate-filled, little englanders.

[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Rich\Carol[/bold] wrote:
I am shocked and surprised that the usual do gooders havnt argued their case and supported these scum. Early days yet and Im waiting for the usual people to say they are English and what about their human rights and Im a racist person.
Bring it on cos these scum pondlife have taken the money for familys and support for British Soldiers who have lost their lives for this country.
Deport them to place of origin , revoke their British passports and lets all wave them goodbye at the airport as these are real scum.
1st offence, BIG WARNING from the magistrate.[/p][/quote]First and foremost these individuals are criminals who should be dealt with by the police and the courts. If you'd have stuck to thos efacts instaed of sticking in your bigoted nonsense I wouldn't have felt it neccessary to post anything.
This is the only country I know where people who want to do good are despised by people who are clearly full of hatred.[/p][/quote]I am not full of hatred. The problem is our courts do not reflect the abuse that some people who come to this country have for our traditions.
No doubt you think Abu Qatada who preaches hatred of the British and is a dangerous man has every right to stay in the UK. Well I don't and when you cross that line like he has tough if his Country of Origin has the death penalty, gets confessions by torture or not. He should have thought of that before repeatedly preaching hatred if you are a non Muslims.
The same goes for these two and any other who abuse our country.
The Human Rights Act is there to provide protection for genuine people who fear for their lives for the sort of country we are, not as a legal shield to stay here.
Actually had it occurred to you that this is exactly what this man wants to drive a wedge and encourage hatred between people which is exactly why he should be deported.
The French kicked out about 200 of his sort after 9/11 and they signed up,to the Human Rights Act as well. Just their judicial system view their citizens have Human Rights as well.[/p][/quote]No you are wrong; I don't think any of that. And actually you have no right to imply or state that that is what I think. It is my right not to be misrepresented by you or anyone else.[/p][/quote]So what do you think? Should he be deported or not?
Do you think he is dangerous or not?
Do you think he is exploiting the Human Rights Act or not?
Do you think he wants to engender hatred between Muslims and others or not?
Do you think he should be deported for or not?[/p][/quote]I believe you should chill a bit; mind your own business and rest your brain cell.[/p][/quote]I suggest you start answering actual question as you got so hot under the collar about implying your answers.[/p][/quote]You are no Jeremy Paxton and your questions have nothing to do with this bit of news and I have no desire to pander to your freakish behaviour. What is this McCarthyism on the Echo websiite? Peole like you are as dangerous as people like Abu Qatada. You all pedal intolerance and hatred.[/p][/quote]You'll get used to it. This website is full of scared, hate-filled, little englanders.Shoebury_Cyclist

John T Pharro wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.

How does that work when a person's parents are different nationalities?

You xenophobes really don't think these things through, do you?

[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.[/p][/quote]How does that work when a person's parents are different nationalities?
You xenophobes really don't think these things through, do you?Shoebury_Cyclist

They are scum they deserve to be hung, prison would kill them if people knew what they did, but of course they will get away with it, bet if it was the other way round would be a massive sentence!!!

They are scum they deserve to be hung, prison would kill them if people knew what they did, but of course they will get away with it, bet if it was the other way round would be a massive sentence!!!gemzta91

Then she should take her chance with the rest of them and stand for election.

[quote][p][bold]asbo industries inc[/bold] wrote:
maybe she needed the money to fund her evidently voracious appetite for pies...[/p][/quote]Then she should take her chance with the rest of them and stand for election.muffindamule

John T Pharro wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.

How does that work when a person's parents are different nationalities?

You xenophobes really don't think these things through, do you?

You have your opinion name calling again.

[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
By the way what about this for an idea. Ban dual nationality. You are British, French, Chinese Afghan anything you like, but that is what your nationality is. That way it would be far more difficult to play both cards and if you had to be deported then far easier to know where to deport to.[/p][/quote]How does that work when a person's parents are different nationalities?
You xenophobes really don't think these things through, do you?[/p][/quote]You have your opinion name calling again.John T Pharro

Rich\Carol wrote:
I am shocked and surprised that the usual do gooders havnt argued their case and supported these scum. Early days yet and Im waiting for the usual people to say they are English and what about their human rights and Im a racist person.

Bring it on cos these scum pondlife have taken the money for familys and support for British Soldiers who have lost their lives for this country.

Deport them to place of origin , revoke their British passports and lets all wave them goodbye at the airport as these are real scum.

1st offence, BIG WARNING from the magistrate.

First and foremost these individuals are criminals who should be dealt with by the police and the courts. If you'd have stuck to thos efacts instaed of sticking in your bigoted nonsense I wouldn't have felt it neccessary to post anything.

This is the only country I know where people who want to do good are despised by people who are clearly full of hatred.

I am not full of hatred. The problem is our courts do not reflect the abuse that some people who come to this country have for our traditions.
No doubt you think Abu Qatada who preaches hatred of the British and is a dangerous man has every right to stay in the UK. Well I don't and when you cross that line like he has tough if his Country of Origin has the death penalty, gets confessions by torture or not. He should have thought of that before repeatedly preaching hatred if you are a non Muslims.
The same goes for these two and any other who abuse our country.
The Human Rights Act is there to provide protection for genuine people who fear for their lives for the sort of country we are, not as a legal shield to stay here.
Actually had it occurred to you that this is exactly what this man wants to drive a wedge and encourage hatred between people which is exactly why he should be deported.
The French kicked out about 200 of his sort after 9/11 and they signed up,to the Human Rights Act as well. Just their judicial system view their citizens have Human Rights as well.

No you are wrong; I don't think any of that. And actually you have no right to imply or state that that is what I think. It is my right not to be misrepresented by you or anyone else.

So what do you think? Should he be deported or not?
Do you think he is dangerous or not?
Do you think he is exploiting the Human Rights Act or not?
Do you think he wants to engender hatred between Muslims and others or not?
Do you think he should be deported for or not?

I believe you should chill a bit; mind your own business and rest your brain cell.

I suggest you start answering actual question as you got so hot under the collar about implying your answers.

You are no Jeremy Paxton and your questions have nothing to do with this bit of news and I have no desire to pander to your freakish behaviour. What is this McCarthyism on the Echo websiite? Peole like you are as dangerous as people like Abu Qatada. You all pedal intolerance and hatred.

You'll get used to it. This website is full of scared, hate-filled, little englanders.

Name calling again. As my old Nan would say that is when you have lost the argument. Had you and others noticed those that agreed with me have been removed?
Free speech I actually called nobody names. So what happened for them to be removed?

[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Rich\Carol[/bold] wrote:
I am shocked and surprised that the usual do gooders havnt argued their case and supported these scum. Early days yet and Im waiting for the usual people to say they are English and what about their human rights and Im a racist person.
Bring it on cos these scum pondlife have taken the money for familys and support for British Soldiers who have lost their lives for this country.
Deport them to place of origin , revoke their British passports and lets all wave them goodbye at the airport as these are real scum.
1st offence, BIG WARNING from the magistrate.[/p][/quote]First and foremost these individuals are criminals who should be dealt with by the police and the courts. If you'd have stuck to thos efacts instaed of sticking in your bigoted nonsense I wouldn't have felt it neccessary to post anything.
This is the only country I know where people who want to do good are despised by people who are clearly full of hatred.[/p][/quote]I am not full of hatred. The problem is our courts do not reflect the abuse that some people who come to this country have for our traditions.
No doubt you think Abu Qatada who preaches hatred of the British and is a dangerous man has every right to stay in the UK. Well I don't and when you cross that line like he has tough if his Country of Origin has the death penalty, gets confessions by torture or not. He should have thought of that before repeatedly preaching hatred if you are a non Muslims.
The same goes for these two and any other who abuse our country.
The Human Rights Act is there to provide protection for genuine people who fear for their lives for the sort of country we are, not as a legal shield to stay here.
Actually had it occurred to you that this is exactly what this man wants to drive a wedge and encourage hatred between people which is exactly why he should be deported.
The French kicked out about 200 of his sort after 9/11 and they signed up,to the Human Rights Act as well. Just their judicial system view their citizens have Human Rights as well.[/p][/quote]No you are wrong; I don't think any of that. And actually you have no right to imply or state that that is what I think. It is my right not to be misrepresented by you or anyone else.[/p][/quote]So what do you think? Should he be deported or not?
Do you think he is dangerous or not?
Do you think he is exploiting the Human Rights Act or not?
Do you think he wants to engender hatred between Muslims and others or not?
Do you think he should be deported for or not?[/p][/quote]I believe you should chill a bit; mind your own business and rest your brain cell.[/p][/quote]I suggest you start answering actual question as you got so hot under the collar about implying your answers.[/p][/quote]You are no Jeremy Paxton and your questions have nothing to do with this bit of news and I have no desire to pander to your freakish behaviour. What is this McCarthyism on the Echo websiite? Peole like you are as dangerous as people like Abu Qatada. You all pedal intolerance and hatred.[/p][/quote]You'll get used to it. This website is full of scared, hate-filled, little englanders.[/p][/quote]Name calling again. As my old Nan would say that is when you have lost the argument. Had you and others noticed those that agreed with me have been removed?
Free speech I actually called nobody names. So what happened for them to be removed?John T Pharro

But they were a metaphor for nazism, which may explain their appeal to Rich\Carol et al.

The Nazis were SOCIALISTS. But you knew that didn't you?

Not.

I think we can thank 13 years of socialist goverment for having these scum bags in the country.

Once caught, no doubt an entire raft of bed wetting apologists will come out to support them.

[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]BIRLIS[/bold] wrote: I'm pretty sure the Daleks weren't from Earth, let alone England.....[/p][/quote]But they were a metaphor for nazism, which may explain their appeal to Rich\Carol et al.[/p][/quote]The Nazis were SOCIALISTS. But you knew that didn't you?
Not.
I think we can thank 13 years of socialist goverment for having these scum bags in the country.
Once caught, no doubt an entire raft of bed wetting apologists will come out to support them.Rochford Rob

But they were a metaphor for nazism, which may explain their appeal to Rich\Carol et al.

The Nazis were SOCIALISTS. But you knew that didn't you?

Not.

I think we can thank 13 years of socialist goverment for having these scum bags in the country.

Once caught, no doubt an entire raft of bed wetting apologists will come out to support them.

Although they called themselves National Socialists, the Nazis were in fact the opposite end of the political spectrum and were ultra-conservatives.

But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your drivel.

[quote][p][bold]Rochford Rob[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]BIRLIS[/bold] wrote: I'm pretty sure the Daleks weren't from Earth, let alone England.....[/p][/quote]But they were a metaphor for nazism, which may explain their appeal to Rich\Carol et al.[/p][/quote]The Nazis were SOCIALISTS. But you knew that didn't you?
Not.
I think we can thank 13 years of socialist goverment for having these scum bags in the country.
Once caught, no doubt an entire raft of bed wetting apologists will come out to support them.[/p][/quote]Although they called themselves National Socialists, the Nazis were in fact the opposite end of the political spectrum and were ultra-conservatives.
But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your drivel.Shoebury_Cyclist

Shaun Butler wrote:
ITS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN TO OUR BRITISH SOLIDERS IS UN ACEPTABLE BUT HOPEFULLY THE COURTS WILL DECIDE THERE FATE AND I HOPE THEY WILL NOT BE MERCIFIL
IN OTHER COUNTRIES HANDS WOULD COME OFF.

they will get a slap, and just start again, this is all they know, scum

[quote][p][bold]Shaun Butler[/bold] wrote:
ITS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN TO OUR BRITISH SOLIDERS IS UN ACEPTABLE BUT HOPEFULLY THE COURTS WILL DECIDE THERE FATE AND I HOPE THEY WILL NOT BE MERCIFIL
IN OTHER COUNTRIES HANDS WOULD COME OFF.[/p][/quote]they will get a slap, and just start again, this is all they know, scumbongking

Shaun Butler wrote:
ITS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN TO OUR BRITISH SOLIDERS IS UN ACEPTABLE BUT HOPEFULLY THE COURTS WILL DECIDE THERE FATE AND I HOPE THEY WILL NOT BE MERCIFIL
IN OTHER COUNTRIES HANDS WOULD COME OFF.

they will get a slap, and just start again, this is all they know, scum

slap on the back

[quote][p][bold]bongking[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Shaun Butler[/bold] wrote:
ITS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THIS TO HAPPEN BUT FOR THIS TO HAPPEN TO OUR BRITISH SOLIDERS IS UN ACEPTABLE BUT HOPEFULLY THE COURTS WILL DECIDE THERE FATE AND I HOPE THEY WILL NOT BE MERCIFIL
IN OTHER COUNTRIES HANDS WOULD COME OFF.[/p][/quote]they will get a slap, and just start again, this is all they know, scum[/p][/quote]slap on the backasbo industries inc

when were these mugshots taken? presumably they have previous or were at large (the mugwomp (definition 3 in
the urban dictionary) is certainly a lard bard) or out on bail (might as well give them a royal pardon).

when were these mugshots taken? presumably they have previous or were at large (the mugwomp (definition 3 in
the urban dictionary) is certainly a lard bard) or out on bail (might as well give them a royal pardon).asbo industries inc

Rich\Carol wrote:
I am shocked and surprised that the usual do gooders havnt argued their case and supported these scum. Early days yet and Im waiting for the usual people to say they are English and what about their human rights and Im a racist person.

Bring it on cos these scum pondlife have taken the money for familys and support for British Soldiers who have lost their lives for this country.

Deport them to place of origin , revoke their British passports and lets all wave them goodbye at the airport as these are real scum.

1st offence, BIG WARNING from the magistrate.

First and foremost these individuals are criminals who should be dealt with by the police and the courts. If you'd have stuck to thos efacts instaed of sticking in your bigoted nonsense I wouldn't have felt it neccessary to post anything.

This is the only country I know where people who want to do good are despised by people who are clearly full of hatred.

I am not full of hatred. The problem is our courts do not reflect the abuse that some people who come to this country have for our traditions.
No doubt you think Abu Qatada who preaches hatred of the British and is a dangerous man has every right to stay in the UK. Well I don't and when you cross that line like he has tough if his Country of Origin has the death penalty, gets confessions by torture or not. He should have thought of that before repeatedly preaching hatred if you are a non Muslims.
The same goes for these two and any other who abuse our country.
The Human Rights Act is there to provide protection for genuine people who fear for their lives for the sort of country we are, not as a legal shield to stay here.
Actually had it occurred to you that this is exactly what this man wants to drive a wedge and encourage hatred between people which is exactly why he should be deported.
The French kicked out about 200 of his sort after 9/11 and they signed up,to the Human Rights Act as well. Just their judicial system view their citizens have Human Rights as well.

No you are wrong; I don't think any of that. And actually you have no right to imply or state that that is what I think. It is my right not to be misrepresented by you or anyone else.

So what do you think? Should he be deported or not?
Do you think he is dangerous or not?
Do you think he is exploiting the Human Rights Act or not?
Do you think he wants to engender hatred between Muslims and others or not?
Do you think he should be deported for or not?

I believe you should chill a bit; mind your own business and rest your brain cell.

I suggest you start answering actual question as you got so hot under the collar about implying your answers.

You are no Jeremy Paxton and your questions have nothing to do with this bit of news and I have no desire to pander to your freakish behaviour. What is this McCarthyism on the Echo websiite? Peole like you are as dangerous as people like Abu Qatada. You all pedal intolerance and hatred.

You'll get used to it. This website is full of scared, hate-filled, little englanders.

Name calling again. As my old Nan would say that is when you have lost the argument. Had you and others noticed those that agreed with me have been removed?
Free speech I actually called nobody names. So what happened for them to be removed?

Did I mention you specifically? No. There's an old adage, "Those who go looking for offence will surely find it".

[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Shoebury_Cyclist[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]John T Pharro[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Elephantman2[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Rich\Carol[/bold] wrote:
I am shocked and surprised that the usual do gooders havnt argued their case and supported these scum. Early days yet and Im waiting for the usual people to say they are English and what about their human rights and Im a racist person.
Bring it on cos these scum pondlife have taken the money for familys and support for British Soldiers who have lost their lives for this country.
Deport them to place of origin , revoke their British passports and lets all wave them goodbye at the airport as these are real scum.
1st offence, BIG WARNING from the magistrate.[/p][/quote]First and foremost these individuals are criminals who should be dealt with by the police and the courts. If you'd have stuck to thos efacts instaed of sticking in your bigoted nonsense I wouldn't have felt it neccessary to post anything.
This is the only country I know where people who want to do good are despised by people who are clearly full of hatred.[/p][/quote]I am not full of hatred. The problem is our courts do not reflect the abuse that some people who come to this country have for our traditions.
No doubt you think Abu Qatada who preaches hatred of the British and is a dangerous man has every right to stay in the UK. Well I don't and when you cross that line like he has tough if his Country of Origin has the death penalty, gets confessions by torture or not. He should have thought of that before repeatedly preaching hatred if you are a non Muslims.
The same goes for these two and any other who abuse our country.
The Human Rights Act is there to provide protection for genuine people who fear for their lives for the sort of country we are, not as a legal shield to stay here.
Actually had it occurred to you that this is exactly what this man wants to drive a wedge and encourage hatred between people which is exactly why he should be deported.
The French kicked out about 200 of his sort after 9/11 and they signed up,to the Human Rights Act as well. Just their judicial system view their citizens have Human Rights as well.[/p][/quote]No you are wrong; I don't think any of that. And actually you have no right to imply or state that that is what I think. It is my right not to be misrepresented by you or anyone else.[/p][/quote]So what do you think? Should he be deported or not?
Do you think he is dangerous or not?
Do you think he is exploiting the Human Rights Act or not?
Do you think he wants to engender hatred between Muslims and others or not?
Do you think he should be deported for or not?[/p][/quote]I believe you should chill a bit; mind your own business and rest your brain cell.[/p][/quote]I suggest you start answering actual question as you got so hot under the collar about implying your answers.[/p][/quote]You are no Jeremy Paxton and your questions have nothing to do with this bit of news and I have no desire to pander to your freakish behaviour. What is this McCarthyism on the Echo websiite? Peole like you are as dangerous as people like Abu Qatada. You all pedal intolerance and hatred.[/p][/quote]You'll get used to it. This website is full of scared, hate-filled, little englanders.[/p][/quote]Name calling again. As my old Nan would say that is when you have lost the argument. Had you and others noticed those that agreed with me have been removed?
Free speech I actually called nobody names. So what happened for them to be removed?[/p][/quote]Did I mention you specifically? No. There's an old adage, "Those who go looking for offence will surely find it".Shoebury_Cyclist