Indeed, 9/11 Commissioners and other officials say that the true facts were hidden from them, or covered up (you don't have to get bogged down in reading this section - you can skip ahead to the next, if you like; this is just documenting that the 9/11 Commission report is in no way the last word on 9/11):

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – recently said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.” And he said: “It’s almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA’s New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened”

A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials, and who has for years been a tireless anti-war advocate and critic of imperial foreign policy (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”

A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job

Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11

Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says “The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence”

If anyone of the major networks --- ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, FOX --- promise to air the entire segment, without editing, I promise to tell them everything that I know," about everything mentioned above, she told us.

"I can tell the American public exactly what it is, and what it is that they are covering up," she continued. "I'm not compromising ongoing investigations," Edmonds explained, because "they've all been shut down since."

Not a single major network has let Edmonds say what she knows.

Indeed, Ellsberg says that the government has ordered the media not to touch Edmonds:

Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations.

As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who “sat on the NSA spying story for over a year” when they “could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome.”

“There will be phone calls going out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,’” he told us.

* * *

“I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’” contends Ellsberg. “The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘”

Other Whistleblowers Being Silenced

Edmonds also says that she has been contacted by two high-ranking military officers who would like to shed light on 9/11, but - due to their oaths of secrecy - can only do so if subpoenaed. No one in Washington wants to issue a subpoena.

High-Level Military Intelligence Officer: No One In Washington Wants To Know

Similarly, a high-level military intelligence officer says that his unit - tasked with tracking Bin Laden prior to 9/11 - was pulled off the task, and there warnings that the World Trade Center and Pentagon were being targeted were ignored.

Moreover, he says that he has information that can shed light on 9/11, and that he has repeatedly tried to get this information to the Obama administration and Congress, but that no one in the administration or Congress wants to hear about it. As just one example, Nancy Pelosi's office demanded that he not even email any information which he has about 9/11.

He is still working in military intelligence, and so he can only publicly speak about 9/11 if he is subpoenaed. He is therefore asking that he be subpoenaed ... but no one wants to look into it:

There are numerous other whistleblowers with key information about 9/11. But no one in the government or media wants to hear what they know.

9/11 was one of the most important events in American history, as 10 years of war in numerous countries - costing trillions of dollars - and the crackdown on liberties like freedom of speech have all been justified by that one event. And yet the politicians in D.C. and the corporate media don't want to hear from the people who can explain the gross incompetence (or worse) which occurred on that day

Most disturbing is the level of general apathy we have as a nation. Some could seriously care less, my friends included. They were not directly affected but fail to see the indirect ramifications this murderous day had.

No one's listening in Washington or the Media simply because they were involved. So, I propose WE stop listening to the Media or Washington. Starting with this anniversary terror threat. Give me a break! Will something happen? Maybe. But if it does you and I and 99% of Americans know who is actually behind it. so, who are THESE LIARS looking for now? Pakistani people, Albanian? I'm so fuckin tired of this shit.

So what is the implication of what your heroine Sibel Edmunds reported? Her own website and claims actually diminish your case, as her argument is that (according to her) the government had enough evidence to block the 911 disaster before it happened, but was incompetent and is trying to cover its arse rather than take responsibility for screwing up. No argument there.

On ZH she is sometimes cited as one who “proved bin Laden was really CIA asset Tim Osman”. Her own website makes no such claim that I have been able to find, so who put those words in her mouth? That claim is silly anyway. Assume for a second “Tim” really was an Agency asset. Would such an obviously explosive bit of intelligence be put in the hands of a contract FBI translator? Does the Agency not have Arabic speakers? (Sibel was hired to translate Turkish and Farsi).

discovery channel is now running nonstop bogus 911 stories regurgitating stupid stories and lies that never happened such as the stupid idiotic bogus story about todd beamer and let's roll bullshit that that never happened..........cell phone calls from hijacked planes........never happened. etc etc etc etc.........heroes made up out of whole cloth to hide what really happened that day. etc etc.....on and on it goes. the lies continue and the amerikans soak it in, and never ask any relevant questions..........so it is............

"No chance 9-11 was anything but a Bin laden operation. He declared war on us, (Feb 98) told us what he planned to do, and then carried it out and claimed credit for it"

You fail to understand the basics of false-flag ops. It's not about creating a false group of terrorists with spooks that work for you, it's about finding sincere groups of aspiring terrorists (Al Qaeda, Red Brigades) and manipulating them until their serve your agenda (9/11 attacks, killing Aldo Moro).

The 1993 pathetic attack against the WTC was a sincere and non-manipulated attempt by islamists to bring down the U.S. Otoh the 2001 sophisticated and conbined attacks were obviously plotted and screenplayed by a higher power than Osama...

This is my read on things as well. That said I really don't care about theories of who did it or all the specifics of what MIGHT have happened. What I care about is the GIANT ASS GAPING HOLES in the official story and BLATANT COVERUPS.

The Coverups are so severe and so evidence based (destroying all the wreckage at the WTC area, gagging witnesses, delaying release of Firefighter tapes etc. etc.) that there is no doubt in my mind there was critical evidence in there.

One thing that is crystal clear is that what happened was beyond merely a Cover Your Ass because we failed situation. No, this was a coverup of complicity, by who I know not, clearly people with UBER power in government and media.

The why of it is clearly to form a police state and war justifications. So I don't care who did it ultimately, what I care is that clearly there was government/media complicity in the coverup.

At the risk of being snarked here, and frankly I don't care if I am, I find all this stuff hilarious.

It's not that I think SOMETHING didn't happen. It did, and we'll never know the full extent. But linking all these crazy events of history into a long term narrative is.....well, let's just say it is. It boggles the imagination, and not because I'm unimaginative. I'm a fellow who, upon seeing the Challenger blow up asked "could it be sabotage?" to the incredulous looks of others. Stuff happens. I'm aware of that.

But all these false flags, information managed by the elite, metanarrative theories are just too outlandish. Not that some didn't happen - they clearly did. But those stories were covered up so poorly the truth eventually came out. If these guys were professional, and they clearly are to have pulled off so many conspiracies, then by now the loose ends would never exist. Is this to say 9/11 wasn't a false flag? No - it could be. But was it? I will not, with 100% or even 60% certainty say it is. I believe Occam's Razor applies. There are enough nutty folks out there with enough talent to fake receipts, fake photographs and put out misleading and faulty information that the conspiracy theorists' views are just as questionable as those who they question.

I have a very good friend who, to this day, believes TWA 800 was shot down. Why? The person was drinking on a boat out on Long Island Sound and saw the explosion. The person also works for FEMA at a local level. The person managed the effort to reconstruct the plane and saw all the evidence. However, when I questioned the person at a party, I asked specific questions.

Why do you think the plane was shot down? I believe I saw an object fly toward the plane before it exploded.

Were you looking at the plane prior to the explosion? No, my attention was drawn to it by activity I saw from the corner of my eye.

So you didn't SEE the missile, you saw movement out of the corner of your eye? Yes, but I thought I saw a missile track after the explosion.

I then showed an interesting eye illusion which made created movement out of the corner of the eye, when in fact there was none. I asked "is it possible you were fooled?" No. Funny. I laughed and continued.

Was there ANY evidence in the hangar which indicated a missile was in play? No - the plane clearly showed a fuselage bowing out based on an internal explosion.

There was no entry point from a missile, or a bowing in of the fuselage from an external impact? No - none at all.

Were any divers aware of odd findings that didn't fit the reconstruction effort? (the person drank with the divers regularly) No.

Were you, at any time told to keep any information from the public or withold your views by any federal investigator when you were questioned, due to the nature of your role and witness of the event? No.

Yet - after all this questioning, without a scrap or shred of evidence aside from the potential of an optical illusion, this person continues to believe it was shot down because "I think I saw a missile". This person saw far more than ANY conspiracy theorist, saw that there was no evidence supporting the missile claim, and just wants to believe.

I believe in UFOs. I really do. But I am not foolish. I believe because I want to believe based on some inner sense that we cannot be alone here in the universe. There is more out there. But I read stories about UFO encounters and sightings and the non-credible ones are very easy to sort from the credible ones. Because it really only takes logic to sort it out....cover ups won't matter in the cases where logic reins. And to be honest, many of these conspiracies defy logic. There is no visible value to be gained by anyone from many of these.

Honestly - what was gained from 9/11? The claims all vary. Greater government control (Patriot Act). Greater profits to war industrialists. More money from the government filtering to preferred vendors. The list goes on and on. But in the end, each one of these things faces severe drawbacks in that none are tied together, the support for the argument is based on flimsy evidence (and not because some great cabal made it flimsy, it's just flimsy if you spend time with professionals talking about how a building collapses, or what can cause it, etc.).

I see alot of people here who probably HATE Rosie O'Donnell. Yet each one gladly tosses their hat in with her on 9/11? I'm sorry....there's something wrong when you suddenly find Rosie O'Donnell credible and a source of support for a cause.

Are there some potentially credible 9/11 conspiracy folks? Sure. But they need to speak up. Saying "I know this, or that, but I'll only tell if such and such happens" is just a means of avoiding a telling of the truth. When you have THE TRUTH, all you need is to put it out there, and it will build on its own logical value. If it doesn't, then maybe THE TRUTH is only someone's truth.

Occam's razor only applies if the simplest explanaition includes ALL the facts. Prior to Gallileo the non-Heliocentric solar system would have fit Occam's Razor, post gallileo you cannot say that the simplest explanation ie the sun rotates around the earth, fits ALL of the facts.

The offical story excludes many of the facts, many people have shown that evidence was destroyed or omitted from the official story. Those are facts, therefore we can say USING OCCAM'S RAZOR that there is a coverup. The destruction of evidence without the use of standard protocol of investigation further means this wasn't merely a cover your ass coverup, but one designed to hide complicity. This is the simplest explanation that fits ALL the facts. Beyond that I don't care if it was Aliens or Rothschilds or whoever.

Right now that is immaterial, as we aren't hunting at the moment for the ultimate villain, but rather for confirmation or denial of the official story. The Official Story is a fairy tale. Period.

At the risk of being snarked here, and frankly I don't care if I am, I find all this stuff hilarious.

It's not that I think SOMETHING didn't happen. It did, and we'll never know the full extent. But linking all these crazy events of history into a long term narrative is.....well, let's just say it is. It boggles the imagination, and not because I'm unimaginative. I'm a fellow who, upon seeing the Challenger blow up asked "could it be sabotage?" to the incredulous looks of others. Stuff happens. I'm aware of that.

But all these false flags, information managed by the elite, metanarrative theories are just too outlandish. Not that some didn't happen - they clearly did. But those stories were covered up so poorly the truth eventually came out. If these guys were professional, and they clearly are to have pulled off so many conspiracies, then by now the loose ends would never exist. Is this to say 9/11 wasn't a false flag? No - it could be. But was it? I will not, with 100% or even 60% certainty say it is. I believe Occam's Razor applies. There are enough nutty folks out there with enough talent to fake receipts, fake photographs and put out misleading and faulty information that the conspiracy theorists' views are just as questionable as those who they question.

I have a very good friend who, to this day, believes TWA 800 was shot down. Why? The person was drinking on a boat out on Long Island Sound and saw the explosion. The person also works for FEMA at a local level. The person managed the effort to reconstruct the plane and saw all the evidence. However, when I questioned the person at a party, I asked specific questions.

Why do you think the plane was shot down? I believe I saw an object fly toward the plane before it exploded.

Were you looking at the plane prior to the explosion? No, my attention was drawn to it by activity I saw from the corner of my eye.

So you didn't SEE the missile, you saw movement out of the corner of your eye? Yes, but I thought I saw a missile track after the explosion.

I then showed an interesting eye illusion which made created movement out of the corner of the eye, when in fact there was none. I asked "is it possible you were fooled?" No. Funny. I laughed and continued.

Was there ANY evidence in the hangar which indicated a missile was in play? No - the plane clearly showed a fuselage bowing out based on an internal explosion.

There was no entry point from a missile, or a bowing in of the fuselage from an external impact? No - none at all.

Were any divers aware of odd findings that didn't fit the reconstruction effort? (the person drank with the divers regularly) No.

Were you, at any time told to keep any information from the public or withold your views by any federal investigator when you were questioned, due to the nature of your role and witness of the event? No.

Yet - after all this questioning, without a scrap or shred of evidence aside from the potential of an optical illusion, this person continues to believe it was shot down because "I think I saw a missile". This person saw far more than ANY conspiracy theorist, saw that there was no evidence supporting the missile claim, and just wants to believe.

I believe in UFOs. I really do. But I am not foolish. I believe because I want to believe based on some inner sense that we cannot be alone here in the universe. There is more out there. But I read stories about UFO encounters and sightings and the non-credible ones are very easy to sort from the credible ones. Because it really only takes logic to sort it out....cover ups won't matter in the cases where logic reins. And to be honest, many of these conspiracies defy logic. There is no visible value to be gained by anyone from many of these.

Honestly - what was gained from 9/11? The claims all vary. Greater government control (Patriot Act). Greater profits to war industrialists. More money from the government filtering to preferred vendors. The list goes on and on. But in the end, each one of these things faces severe drawbacks in that none are tied together, the support for the argument is based on flimsy evidence (and not because some great cabal made it flimsy, it's just flimsy if you spend time with professionals talking about how a building collapses, or what can cause it, etc.).

I see alot of people here who probably HATE Rosie O'Donnell. Yet each one gladly tosses their hat in with her on 9/11? I'm sorry....there's something wrong when you suddenly find Rosie O'Donnell credible and a source of support for a cause.

Are there some potentially credible 9/11 conspiracy folks? Sure. But they need to speak up. Saying "I know this, or that, but I'll only tell if such and such happens" is just a means of avoiding a telling of the truth. When you have THE TRUTH, all you need is to put it out there, and it will build on its own logical value. If it doesn't, then maybe THE TRUTH is only someone's truth.

If anyone has all of this earth shattering truths, you don't need the media. Have they ever heard of Youtube? If they actually have great truths, backed by facts then they could put it on Youtube and it would go viral thus forcing "responsible media" to jump on the bandwagon in order to "break" the story wide open. Maybe these folks want to ensure some payday from media outlets. I don't know but I would think if I had these great secrets I could find many ways to tell my story and get it known. Once it's known and it vetted and fact checked, then that's all the protection a person needs. Of course, they actually need truths, not conjecture and they need to have a set of balls and want to make change and make a difference, no matter what the cost. Something about "Give me liberty of or give me death". Staying silent but hinting at great scandals and truths is cowardice or flat out BS. We need folks of courage to save the country, not a bunch of people hinting at all the lies told but yet stay in the shadows, staying silent orther than dropping hints. We also need apolitical folks without agenda's to bring down one party or the other. Until that happens it's hard to believe what anyone says about anything and they should just keep their mouths shut unless they really have something to say.

No chance 9-11 was anything but a Bin laden operation. He declared war on us, (Feb 98)told us what he planned to do, and then carried it out and claimed credit for it. A coverup? Sure there's always some coverup when the goverment has f**ked up this badly. Just like Pearl Harbor you could see this thing coming a mile away but we were not sure exactly where or when it would happen. And Saudi's and other Arabs (who our goverment has sucked up to) were primary financiers of Bin Laden. Hell, he was the Che Guevera of the middle east for his role against the Russians in Afghanistan.

one thing is for sure. on any issue, that comes up, beware and i do mean, beware, and be untrusting of any helpful jews coming forward saying they want to help find out who did what.....beware "helpful" jews.....in the words of edgar j steele, presently cooling off in federal prison, having been sentenced there on trumped up charges,............never trust a jew.............

Or better, never trust man who say never trust a jew because he trying to deflect attention from self. Men who hate, are men to avoid. Do you stink with bad teeth too? Sorry for you and sorry for the people who approve what you say, you are ugly people.

9/11 was a job planned by the bush crime syndicate to coverup links between the bush cartel, saddam hussein, and osama bin laden aka tim osman, all of whom interconnect in the enron scandal....the criminals had access to nanothermite which laced 3 towers and was used to destroy them.....no plane crashed into the pentagon - the pentagon section was destroyed by a cruise missle to destroy evidence of bush crimes....i don't believe that any planes crashed into the towers either....

the chaircunt of the 9/11 commission told jesse ventura - aired on tv - that the 9/11 commission was not established to find the truth but to "maintain the institution."

one purpose of 9/11 was impose a police state and funnel trillions of more dollars into the coffers of the plutocrats. aron russo reports in his interview with alex jones that nick rockefeller warned about the event months and months before it happened......

america is a criminal nazi totalitarian barbaric regime in desperate need of change.

Er...you might want to amend that. My wife was driving into work on that day and saw the plane flying even with the highway to her left. Thinking, "that's funny, there's no runway there" it hit the Pentagon, sending a mushroom cloud of flames into the sky. Every car on the highway went from 75MPH to zero in seconds with no collisions and everybody who didn't see the plane started running around screaming about a nuclear attack.

So you see, either my wife is part of the conspiracy, or a plane did hit the Pentagon.

Thanks for the post Smiddy. I think that most of the problems with finding some level of an accurate description of those events is that the well has been polluted with so many crazy stories, from missiles, to hologram planes, scalar weapons, moonbeams, etc.

We have taken up the role as individuals to solving all the riddles of this day. The onus is on us. And that is ass backwards.

All we have to do is say that the story they are telling is bullshit. Release the information and let us come to our own conclusions.

The official story is that office fires destroyed WTC7. If that were the case, then every single fire code would need to be updated to reflect this, certainly from an insurance perspective.

But nothing has changed in that regard. That is because when they say office furniture caused it to fall, it meant only in this one instance.

Most people are not honest enough to entertain all possibilities. I count myself as one of them. I dismissed the Russian angle offhand. I should read up on it.

But to me it really doesn't matter what actually happened. All that matters is that our governement felt the need to lie to us to protect them and forward THEIR own goals. And that is unacceptable.

Well put. You are right of course. That's why it's helpful to focus on Bldg#7. There's plenty of video showing it collapse like an old Las Vegas casino. No plane hit it. No mention of it in the bogus 9/11 commision report!

Controlled demolition is the only rational explanation.

Have another look all ye False Flag Deniers out there [paid, normalacy-biased, tribal or otherwise] and explain to us and yourself how it is not a controlled demolition.

Two planes Three buildings. Anyone who can watch the video of Bldg.#7 collapsing and swallow the claim that planes brought it down will swallow anything.

Yes, you can question the veracity of Smiddywesson or his wife, but there is no doubt whatsoever that Alex Jones was not there to see any missile, Webster Tarpley was not there to see any missile, nobody associated with Loose Change was there to see a missile, and....etc.

Apparently you are of the belief that the "conspirators" had a budget problem and could only afford the commercial jets that hit the WTC. Austerity forced them to go with a missile at the Pentagon, even though their target was just across the highway from a major airport and jets approaching it would not necessarily draw attention.

Lots of folks on the George Washington Parkway and the other major roads near the Pentagon saw a commercial jet. A military C-130 pilot not only saw it, he reported it to be an American Airlines commercial jet...before it struck.

Chindit - do us a favor and explain Bldg.7 How could Bldg.7, not hit by a plane and some distance from the towers collapse at free fall speed into it's footprint unless it was pre-wired for a controlled demolition>?

The seismic footprint indicates a collapse lasting 18 seconds. That’s not free fall speed. Gravity is not approximate. One of the penthouses fell away first. According to firefighters on the scene, debris from the collapse of the north tower tore a twenty story gash in WTC7 and set the building ablaze. Firefighters were either already deceased, or else looking for survivors and lost collegues in the rubble of the towers. Cut water mains left little or no pressure with which to fight the fires.

Steel doesn’t have to melt to be weakened or to become malleable. A visit to a blacksmith will demonstrate that. One of the penthouses of WTC7 fell first, leaving a tremendous amount of stress (force) on the internal atrium. The building did not fall into its own footprint, either. The undamaged north face of it fell last, to the south, and ended up laying atop the rest of the building.

No free fall, no footprint. Massive damage from the north tower debris. Unattended fires raging for nearly eight hours. Reports by firefighters on the scene of creaking and leaning, and the expectation that it was going to tumble.

And yet the Pentagon, the most heavily secured building in D.C., with a plethora of hi-res security cameras around the entire compound....was able to produce exactly ZERO images of a commercial airliner that measures almost 200 feet in length. Oh yeah, there's that grainy 'guard shack' sequence where there is a small white blur followed by an explosion. Definitely a Boeing 757. Yeah, definitely.

What most folks who deny the missile theory are fogetting is that the military has unmanned drones which resemble full-sized aircraft (i.e. Global Hawk). It would be beyond easy to paint one up in American Airlines livery and fool 90% of eye witnesses. What about the other 10% who don't agree a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon? Well, THOSE people are simply kooks.

From personal experience working aircraft wreckage sites, I can safely say that there is no such thing as hundreds of tons of metal evaporating into oblivion simply because a plane crashed 'really, really, hard'. There is ALWAYS identifiable wreckage left. Yet THIS time it was different?

they never have a come back for that one do they. Pretty sure the building has some nifty air defense too and golly they had time to track it in. Cause it's not like they knew we were under attack by then.

Definition: When governments or organizations (usually connected to the former) stage highly sophisticated attacks on their own or foreign soil with the purpose of placing the blame on a desirable enemy foreign or domestic, one who has otherwise done no wrong. Essentially a setup, it provides the government entity with an excuse via fabricated evidence in complicity with media to fulfill its various agendas (i.e. war or law making).

As false flag operations gain further ground and frequency, the better you know their history, the sooner you can recognize when they are about to happen or as they occur.

It is a fact that essentially every single war since the Spanish-American War of 1898 has included the use of a false flag operation as an excuse to enter into conflict. The lies have become uncovered after the fact, too late to prevent mass death and destruction.

As practically the only anti-war candidate, Ron Paul recently pointed out such a fact to the other puppet candidates during a debate. The other candidates are heartily calling for World War III which could possibly destroy the planet by dressing up an Iranian invasion, whereas Paul points out that the Iraq war (which has massacred over one million Iraqis) was based on an utter and complete fabricated lie.

Obviously, upon discovery of such a lie, the only logical conclusion would be to end the war and persecute the liars. However, the true controllers of this media-complicit false flag operation merely replaced the lie with another more pliable excuse to fool the fluoride-head public, such as the Truman-Johnson-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-(Clinton) Doctrine of “spreading freedom and democracy” to countries fighting against communism, I mean, terrorism.

Fact: The US sensationalist media and government lied, blamed it on Spain and began a “splendid little war” on a false pretext. Spain was later exonerated and “faulty” explosives or ammunition were officially blamed.

The 1962 Pentagon Operation Northwoods document, rejected by Kennedy, planned to commit similar acts, deliberately blowing up ships, and expending the lives of their own soldiers and civilians in order to provide an excuse for Cuban invasion. The report went on to detail how the terror attacks and false flag operation would be dubbed in the media as a “Remember the Maine” event. This would lead one to allude that the strategists are suggesting the USS Maine incident itself was a false flag operation.

Event: The deliberate sending of a passenger ship by British and American authorities to certain death in German patrolled water, leading to the eventual sinking of the ship by German submarines.

Fact: Despite the Germans having put out newspaper advertisements as warning and it being known that any trespassing ship would be destroyed, instead of saving lives, the Anglo-American governments deliberately assisted in the massacre of hundreds of innocent lives in order to provide a pretext for entrance into the Great War for Civilization, more commonly known as World War I.

Fact: A month after Hitler took power, the government building burned down and served as an excuse to pass an Enabling Act which annulled the constitution and made him dictator. Furthermore, Germany created an enemy out of the communists to use as fear for population control and eventual foreign aggression.

Fact: The attacks were brought on by the U.S. itself via careful execution of set goals. These included the armament of Japans enemies, cut-off of energy supplies and port access closure. At the very least, the Federal Government knew of the coming attack having decoded messages and instead of warning the Hawaiian naval base, deliberately kept them as sitting ducks to be massacred. This was used as an official excuse for the U.S. to enter into World War II.

Sources:

Stinnett, Robert B. Day of Deceit: the Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor. New York, NY: Touchstone, 2001. Engdahl, William. Gods of Money: Wall Street and the Death of the American Century. Wiesbaden, Germany: Edition.engdahl, 2009. Prange, Gordon W., Donald M. Goldstein, and Katherine V. Dillon. At Dawn We Slept: the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor. New York, NY: Penguin, 2001.

1946, Cold War

Event: The concoction of a grand mythological metanarrative dialectic on a global scale between the two countries of the U.S. and U.S.S.R. by George Kennan and Paul Nitze, among others.

Motive: Establish national security state, provide excuse for development of military-industrial-complex and allow for lebensraum, the expansion of Anglo-American economic “breathing” or “vital space”.

“Following proclamation of the Truman Doctrine, a creation of Secretary of State Dean Acheson, the Administration’s propaganda apparatus tried to drum up popular support for their Cold War against the ‘evil, Godless’ communists in the Soviet Union. They believed that they could win popular voter support for huge increases in Federal defense spending by ‘scaring the hell out of America,’ as one of Truman’s advisors put it –perhaps by engendering a ‘war scare to deceive the nation.’” (Engdahl)

Sources:

Engdahl, William. Gods of Money: Wall Street and the Death of the American Century. Wiesbaden, Germany: Edition.engdahl, 2009. 233. “NSC-68 United States Objectives and Programs for National Security.” Federation of American Scientists. 31 Jan. 1950. <http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsc-hst/nsc-68.htm>.

25 June 1950, Korean War

Event: The air raid attack and initial provocation of North Korea by the South followed by an all out war. The first use of a global police force (UN) with the US supporting the South and the Sino-Soviets supporting the North.

Fact: “A war to ‘defend’ South Korea had many attractions. First it would indirectly implicate the Soviet Union as the main supporter of the North Korean regime of communist Kim il Sung. Second, the Rockefellers and the Dulles brothers and their business associates had poured huge investments into South Korea.”

“June 25, 1950, the world received the shocking report from South Korea that the North Korean Army had launched a major invasion of the south. The reports were conflicting however. American historian John Gunther, then traveling in Japan with General MacArthur, provided this first-hand account of an aide to the US General: ‘The south Koreans have attacked the north!’” (Engdahl)

Sources:

Engdahl, William. Gods of Money: Wall Street and the Death of the American Century. Wiesbaden, Germany: Edition.engdahl, 2009. 233. Gunther, John, and Carl H. Pforzheimer. The Riddle of MacArthur: Japan, Korea, and the Far East. New York: Harper, 1951.

15 August 1953, Iran, Operation Ajax

Event: CIA and British intelligence stage terror attacks to overthrow a peaceful and democratic Iran, even after Prime Minister Mossadegh successful argues the Iranian case in a world court. They steal their petroleum and replace the regime with a dictatorship, setting up the SAVAK secret police with the assistance of the Israeli Mossad, which is then used for torture and domestic repression.

Fact: The CIA designed the invasion in order to put President Kennedy between a rock and a hard place, potentially forced to escalate into a full scale invasion and war. Peacemaker JFK was able to maneuver out of the predicament.

Sources:

Douglass, James W. JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2008. Kornbluh, Peter. “Top Secret CIA ‘Official History’ of the Bay of Pigs: Revelations.” The National Security Archive. 15 Aug. 2011. <http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB355/index.htm>

13 March 1962, Pentagon, Operation Northwoods

Event: Plan approved by Joint Chiefs of Staff to kill American citizens, stage terror attacks and destroy remote controlled aircraft among other incidents, to be blamed on Cuba.

Fact: In the vein of the USS Maine and Bay of Pigs, to provide a pretext for a Cuban war. Vetoed by Kennedy, followed by his subsequent assassination.

Fact: Lee Harvey Oswald had been dressed up as communist patsy. The subsequent President Lyndon Johnson escalated the Vietnam War, being fought against the “Communist World Revolution” and the “Domino Effect.” JFK had planned to pull out of Vietnam. After having been setup by the CIA on numerous occasions, JFK wanted to scatter the agency to the wind, breaking it into a thousand pieces. Besides having confronted powerful business interests (i.e. US Steel), he issued executive orders allowing the US Treasury to issue currency redeemable in silver, United States Notes, not Federal Reserve Notes.

Fact: Declassified files and McNamara himself reveal that the incident was a clear false flag operation. The Vietnamese had not attacked the US, but the case was made for one. LBJ promptly issued the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution which took the US to war, enriching the military-industrial-complex, opening up the economies of Third World countries for exploitation and furthering the Cold War narrative.

Event: Under the orders of President Johnson to completely sink the ship with crew on board, Israel executes the attacks which last for hours. It was to be blamed on Egypt to serve as a pretext for entry into the Middle Eastern war theatre. Russian reconnaissance saved the day.

Event: Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. by US Government, blamed on James Earl Ray.

Fact: MLK had been under total surveillance and deemed a threat by the government. A 1999 King family court case found Earl Ray innocent and agencies of the US Government GUILTY of killing the preacher and agent of social change.

Event: Maurice Strong establishes the political agenda of Green Global Governance, later to be codified at the 1992 Rio Summit as “climate change” and promoted by high priest Al Gore first as “global warming,” then as “climate change” and then suggested by some as “global climate disruption.”

Former Soviet Premier jumps on the bandwagon with his Green Cross and call for an “Earth Charter,” testifying to Patrick Wood’s (co-founder, Greenpeace) declaration that the communists have taken over the “green” movement. John Holdren in his 1970’s Ecoscience textbook calls for a “planetary regime” with the power of forced sterilization, working with co-author Paul Ehrlich, who advocates mass extermination.

Motives: To establish world government based on the false scare of man-made global warming and the false science propagated by corrupt scientists, from NASA to the CRU in East Anglia University to the UN and its IPCC. To micromanagement every aspect of human life, with a focus on depopulation and the eradication of the majority of mankind.

Fact: The polar bears are actually increasing! The polar bear propagandists are being investigated for corruption! CO2 is not a pollutant but a basic building block of life! CO2 follows temperature rise by hundreds of years! The greenhouse gas theory is fraudulent! The climate scientists in Australia and New Zealand, in legal terms, admitted their lying and guilt by destroying evidence in what became known as Kiwigate and Australiagate! Add on to that Polarbeargate, Climategate, NASAGate and any others I’ve missed, you’re in for a party!

Event: U.S. telling Iraq they would have no problem with an Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, then using Hussein’s invasion as an excuse to invade Iraq. U.S. lying to Saudi Arabia in regards to massive Iraqi troop alignment along borders as excuse to send in military. U.S. having Kuwaiti ambassador’s daughter trained by Hollywood acting company to lie about Iraqi’s killing babies. Etc, etc.

Motives: Entrance into “Gulf War” theatre, natural resources, the start of a “new world order”, Saddam’s threats to stop using US dollars for trade, Project for a New Middle East, military-industrial-complex, etc, etc.

Event: Bombing of government building via explosives in van and within building itself. Blamed solely on one man (Timothy McVeigh), completely disregarding structurally placed explosives and eyewitness accounts.

Event: Young passport-less Nigerian man is somehow let on to a plane by a mysterious well-dressed Indian man (per witnesses), despite being on a terror watchlist and with authorities having been warned ahead of time by his concerned father.

Motives: Continue false “Global War on Terror” (GWOT) narrative. Provide excuse for the continued expansion of TSA and DHS powers and domestic security and surveillance grid. Increase funding, etc.

Event: The massacre of civilians via bombing and shooting by a right-wing domestic extremist blue-eyed caucasian Norwegian. Another instance of where a police and military drill went live, this time only twenty-six minutes after the drill had ended.

Motives: Continue a “strategy of tension” in the vein of Gladio. Shift narrative from left-wing and Muslim extremist to right-wing domestic populace, essentially broadening the suspect spectrum to now include anyone and everyone. The perfect pretext for the rendition and unwarranted arrest of any individual regardless of evidence or racial profile.

This is rather a brief list and much more could be added. Certainly they are not limited to the US-centered network but apply also to that of the Russians, Israelis and other entities.

Studying the conspiratorial and realistic view of history may tend to make one view nearly every event as a larger “conspiracy.” Given the nature of the degenerates in power, that is unfortunately pretty much the case.

However, facts should objectively be checked and events weighed before mindlessly declaring them part of a systemic conspiracy. By their very nature these events fit the dictionary description of a conspiracy regardless, whether part of a small group of discontents or the systemic dark forces behind deep events, well detailed by Professor Peter Dale Scott. Let us pray these dark forces spare countless lives by foregoing any vile plans they may have for the tenth anniversary of their New York false flag operation.

Global Governance Archive is an information war desk which seeks to aid researchers both new and old in sifting through the most important material on everything from economy to the architecture of global government which is now being built.