| Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item.

−

| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]

+

| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]

|-

|-

−

| 2014-02-18

−

| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]

−

| Ban Robin

−

| Ban Robin from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior.

−

| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]

−

|-

−

| 2014-02-15

−

| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]

−

| Only members can join the council.

−

| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/4 Pull Request]. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions.

−

| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]

−

|-

−

| 2014-02-15

−

| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]

−

| Publish member list in our policies git repo.

−

| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/3 Github issue]

−

| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]

−

|-

−

| 2014-02-09

−

| [[User:MadCap|Robin]]

−

| Ban Pidgeon

−

| Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.

−

| [[User:MadCap|Robin]]

−

|-

−

| 2014-1-9

−

| [[User:Dana|Dana]]

−

| Consensus process change

−

| 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member [http://www.cohousing.org/popups/gp_blocks.htm stand-asides] or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.

−

−

2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.

−

−

3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.

−

| [[User:Dana|Dana]]

−

|-

−

|2013-12-10

−

|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]]

−

| ''Tabled until details are elaborated'' Expiration period for associate member policy

−

|Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days to the consensus decision [[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_29#Proposal_to_create_an_Associate_Member_role_and_limit_access_to_Noisebridge_24.2F7_to_Member.2C_Associate_Member_and_thoes_hosted_by_M_and_AM|to create new Member role]]. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a second consensus. If no consensus can be reached, Noisebridge will revert to being open to the public.

−

|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]]

Revision as of 11:46, 11 April 2014

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item.