Our IR filter is severely cutting the blue component. Altasen sensor is sensitive to shorter blue wavelength comparing to other sensors like Micron. Recently we found out that the IR filters (Hot mirror) that we ordered to Schott for this camera are made not exactly according to our specs. We are ordering new filters and send replacement to our customers.

No compression is needed for 30fps 1080p 12bit.
Compression can be turned on or off with our application program or by API. presently it works only at 8 bit (that is after selecting a table look up) and it is needed if you wish to shoot at 60 fps 1080p (8bit)
Compression now is only a linear prediction coding scheme with a limited 1.7 times compression ratio. We provide decompressing formula and example code to our customers. Later we will put more details on our website.
We are working on some fancy new compression that will allow 12 bit (firmware not ready yet.)

We are dedicated to supporting our customers with them using our cameras. Anything not posted on our website can be provided if it is needed and is not against our obligations to sensor manufacturer. We are still supporting our original camera SMX-110 with Zoran sensor. For our Altasens camera we need to get individual permission from Altasen to provide information in data-sheet of sensor to specific customer. I hope they will allow us to post a gleanings of the data-sheet on our website.

10 bit table look up will be added later.

This camera is designed to be flexible and simple. everything that can be done on the PC side must be done on the PC side. Other interesting features like continuous changing of frame rate, frame by frame, is done on camera side.

are there heat problems with the casing? (there doesn't seem to be ventilation and i thought sensors get quite hot)

Paul, So far we have not seen any problem with heath. Camera is very stable indoor or in below freeze outside. Howerver, the body gets warm.
There is a heath sinking design that transfers the heath from sensor board to the Aluminum alloy solid case.

Would a laptop work as a capture station, what are the real minimum specs? (there's a wealth of small form factors PCs and ultra portables out there).

Some laptops are excellent and some do not allow full bandwidth of GigaE. We had good results with IBM, and Gateway. I think any newer laptop will be ok.

What is the data rate down that GigE?

We are using 92% GigaE

What are the realistic time scales for these being readily available? (especially with the new altasens sensor - the one in the SI 2K)?

We are making 80 more with the same Altasens 3562. There is no advantage of going to 4562. Later we consider Aatachrome 2/3" and perhaps new Sony sensors.

Is the RAW data from the head standardised, so if a new head came along the software would be the same?

Almost. Some features will be different from sensor to sensor, all else will be identical.

What are the real issues in pulling something together that works in the field?

we are too busy with making camera heads. we give you tools and support to do the integration for something that works in the field. This is not our expertise yet.

A LUT that can be set by user for 12 bits to 8 bits is already available. I mentioned that later we will add LUT for 12 to 10 bits. This we will do by interpolating, so 10 bits LUT will take the same memory as 8 bit version. User can only specify the LUT by 256 points, either 10 bits or 8 bits.

Yes, FPGA and programmer controllers are used inside the cameras and firmware is updated automatically with new camera drivers.

We just got some new IR filters. It will take some time before we post new sample videos. Altasens has extra ordinary color distinction. Using a correct filter makes all the difference. both blue and red are much enhanced.

You mean the APS-C sensor? Is this for machine vision (because it looks to be limited to 12fps)?

Although it would be very interesting if, by binning, this rate could be increased to have lower, more sensitive HD resolution. An APS-C size sensor in one of these things would open up the lens choices enormously.

Of course i'll take an HD 2/3rds for the time being once i know it all works :)

I've got news... Not about the camera, sorry, but I just received my new Computar 2/3" C-Mount zoom. I have to say I'm quite impressed with it. I haven't been able to test it yet, since I don't have the camera, but it looks fantastic.

It's a 12,5-75mm F1.2 zoom and those are 35mm equivalents, so they're real measures for 2/3" sensors. It looks even more solid than many of my canon EOS lenses, lol. Kinda like the feel of an old FD lens but brand new.

To those of you who question the option of using C-Mount machine vision lenses for film shooting, I have to say this lens has removed all possible doubts from my mind. The usual complaints about these kind of C-Mount lenses are small diameter and fixed positions when adjusting the iris (in most lenses you may notice a little "click" when going from one position to another). In this lens, the three rings are very smooth. And I mean VERY. On the other hand people complain about c-mount diameters because they are too small to control the focus. This lens is closer to 35mm in terms of size, so focusing is not a hard task. In fact I was really impressed with the size. Having used the lens from my first Micron demo board, I expected this one to be much smaller and definitely not this heavy. This' going to look fantastic with a followfocus and a mattebox.

I've been testing a number of lenses on a camera here to try and understand real world results. I've got 16mm lenses, EF-cmount adaptor and a 25mm f1.4 fujinon machine vision lens.

Bottom line is im impressed with the fujinon, good feeling, 180 degrees of focus, nice image - bit soft on the edges but on a 2/3rds you probably wouldn't see that (im using a 1" sensor). This is compared to an old T2 cooke 25mm, switar f.16 10mm and various canon lenses (10-22mm works nicely for example)

I would love to see some images from that computar, it's on my hit list too. Would like to see how soft at f1.2 vs f4 for example.

My feeling is that the glass in these lines probably isn't *that* different to fujinons digital cinema offerings. I mean there's probably 20x the price difference and certainly not 20 times a better image