Above is a video showing that the medical examiner had pressed for laws not to disclose information on any autopsy of a murdered child. This was almost two years ago.The video goes on to show Carver’s medical examiners office had signs of massive corruption.

To me this strongly suggests that this was at least two years in the planning stage.

Quoting: Rinty

Whoever made that video did a horrible job, all the way around. It could have been trimmed to about 3 minutes, and all I wanted to do was reach into the guy's mouth and pull the words out. That was a painful experience. The 5 minutes of completely garbled audio was a nice touch. "Select...delete" Problem solved.

Carver pressed for a law to be passed that was redundant, knowing and stating that it was redundant. He threatened to quit over it if it was not passed. He rescinded the threat after it was passed...even though it was an unnecessary law??

That guy is as batshit crazy as his press conference shows him to be. I want to see his IQ test scores and his grades; my guess is that he rode the shortest of buses to school, and his mommy must have slept with the right people to land him a cushy bureaucratic position like that, because he's an incompetent nitwit that I would not entrust with the complex act of microwaving the breakfast food at McDonald's. And I'm not kidding.

As for the purging of his staff...well, I can only assume those were people he hired himself. They had to work FOR HIM. Those poor bastards. Does that make the office especially corrupt? That's a bit of a stretch.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32284139

Dear Anonymous Coward (User ID: 32284139),

There are a number of points in your response to my post that I agree with. You stated, “Whoever made that video did a horrible job, all the way around. It could have been trimmed to about 3 minutes, and all I wanted to do was reach into the guy's mouth and pull the words out.” Yes, I agree. On the Internet most people pay attention to videos. It could be that the person felt the information important, tried video, but was not familiar with that media. I completely agree.

You also stated that, “…Carver pressed for a law to be passed that was redundant, knowing and stating that it was redundant. He threatened to quit over it if it was not passed. He rescinded the threat after it was passed...even though it was an unnecessary law??...” That also stood out to me as being very odd. By further statements it is possible that you are indicating that he was doing this because he was stupid. Certainly that is a possibility. I also think it is possible that he was being very manipulative. Perhaps parts of the law were redundant. But also, perhaps with this redundancy there were critical parts that were not. So manipulatively he is saying something to the effect, “I will cause problems if you don’t pass it, and why not because it is covered by other laws anyway.”

I note that the thrust of the new regulation is to keep under wraps autopsies of children who were murdered. This preceded the alleged murder of children in Sandy Hook of which there are many questions.

The video also notes that there were a number of prior corruption charges regarding parts of his staff. Some of those charges might have been out of state. Still….

I am answering and reposting the link as I do not want this evidence summarily tossed out.