Environmental advocates need to find people who are aware of the world’s growing environmental issues but have not yet taken action. We need to convince them to do something. This will not be achieved by browbeating or berating them, but by offering positive reinforcement to work toward a solution.

The University of Saskatchewan administration and the U of S Students’ Union have the same definition of sustainability: “Sustainability is the stewardship of the natural environment in a socially and economically responsible manner that meets the needs of both present and future generations.”

This definition is empowering as it doesn’t preach or condescend, and it gets right to the point.

The fight against ignorance will not be won if framed in combative terms. If we are going to get people on side we should empower them and avoid squabbling about who rode their bike more or whose low-flush toilet saves the most water.

We’ve all contributed to the environmental mess and it’s difficult to find the right way to get across the urgency of the issues. But in encouraging others to live more sustainable lifestyles, we have to be careful not to divide people who might otherwise work together.

It can be satisfying to win arguments about the environment but doing so won’t save the planet. Figuring out the right way to convince others to live more sustainably will. I strongly believe getting more people involved will also encourage politicians to put sustainability on their agendas.

Politicians get paid to pay attention to what the public wants and we shouldn’t let condescension limit the movement. Environmentalism should be about working with everyone, not just the people who are already involved. My bet is that once this succeeds politicians will stop covering their collective ears. The first step, though, will have to be bringing more citizens into the fold.

Sustainability deals with deep-rooted habits, such as what we choose to eat, buy and do with our time. Not surprisingly, it is often a touchy subject.

With that in mind, it seems quite obvious that shaming anyone into reducing, recycling and reusing will never work.

All this does is create a divide among people trying their best to achieve environmental goals or are thinking about joining the movement. Self-righteous claims about who saved more energy or water can really turn people off.

Sustainability can and should be convenient: all-in-one blue-bin recycling has already been implemented at the university, and will go into effect across Saskatoon soon. More measures like this, that make sustainable living practical and easy, should be put into place in Saskatoon and beyond. I hope that with enough people taking part, sustainable living can become even more convenient than it already is.

I believe contemporary environmentalism is at a crossroads. There must be tangible, non-shameful solutions offered. This is why a practical and positive approach to sustainability is necessary.

If you are a cyclist, you’re much more likely to succeed in encouraging others to start biking if you talk about how fun it is or how easy it is to bike around town (even in winter!) rather than how car drivers are killing the planet. I understand that I’m not saying anything most people don’t already know, but I think it needs to be put into practice a little more often.

We can either decide to incorporate as many people as possible in a friendly way and create a sustainable culture of positivity, or we can continue to preach to our own while shaming others with how awful we are all being, which allows others to easily revert to their old habits.

Marcel Laforge: Five months yesterday, but to break it down, 151 days — give or take.

How did you two meet?

Emily Myers: It’s a really funny story, actually. The first time we matched on Tinder was like a year before we matched for the second [successful] time. The first time he asked me out, I straight up said no.

ML: [laughs] On Tinder, whenever you ask someone out, they’ll either say, “Yeah, sure, let’s hang out,” not that I’ve ever asked anyone out besides Emily, or they would basically just not answer you. The funny thing about her is she just said no — I was like “fuck.” But then, when I got Tinder back about six months after having deleted it, she was the first girl I matched with.

EM: Awww.

ML: [blushes] I was like, “Hey, it’s dolphin girl,” because her profile picture at one point had been her and a dolphin, and I still remembered it. I was like, “Hmm, yeah, this is dolphin girl — [she seems] goofy and cool.”

EM: On a whim — it was just, like, a Wednesday — I was just like, “Hey, want to hang out now?” and he said, “Sure.”

When did you feel like your partner was a person that you really wanted to be with?

ML: I definitely knew during our first date that I got along with her super well — I remember driving home and being like, “This is something that is going to be special.”

What is the best thing about your partner?

EM: He always knows how to make me smile, and [how to] make me feel really good about myself — no matter what kind of mood I’m in.

What would you tell your younger self about love?

ML: I would tell my younger self, “Hey, relax — not only are you going to find someone who’s very caring and lovely, like Emily is, but you’re also going to find someone who makes you feel like you can be yourself around them. You’re also going to find someone who’s super hot, too.” [laughs]

I always tell Emily that I never thought I would date anyone as beautiful as her — good things come to those who wait, I guess.