[Akin] justified his opposition to abortion rights even in case of rape with a claim that victims of “legitimate rape” have unnamed biological defenses that prevent pregnancy.

“First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare,” Akin told KTVI-TV in an interview posted Sunday. “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

Interesting that Republicans did not react in such panic mode after Akin, days after capturing the Missouri Senate nomination, called for the morning-after pill to be banned. Akin claimed emergency contraceptives are a form of abortion (it isn’t), and he doesn’t approve, since he believes all abortion should be banned.

He’s not alone in this opinion; new Romney running mate Paul Ryan, the guy who once said he’s “as pro-life as a person gets,” also doesn’t believe in any exceptions for abortion. Granted, Ryan hasn’t been stupid enough to use the phrase “legitimate rape” in public, but make no mistake: the only difference here is one of vocabulary. A reminder, from Romney’s hometown Boston Globe:

Last year, Ryan joined Akin as one of 227 co-sponsors of a bill that narrowed an exemption to the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding for abortions. The Hyde Amendment allows federal dollars to be used for abortions in cases of rape and incest, but the proposed bill – authored by New Jersey Representative Christopher H. Smith – would have limited the incest exemption to minors and covered only victims of “forcible rape.”

House Republicans never defined what constituted “forcible rape” and what did not, but critics of the bill suggested the term could exclude women who are drugged and raped, mentally handicapped women who are coerced, and victims of statutory rape.

The “forcible” qualifier was eventually removed before the bill passed in the House last May. The Democrat-controlled Senate did not vote on the measure.

The “forcible” or “legitimate” rape arguments are one and the same. There’s no effort to join Ryan and Akin in this regard; they arrived that way. Romney’s campaign can claim that their guy believes in the rape/incest/health-of-the-mother exceptions, but their guy just, in essence, hired a guy who has been open about his disagreement on those issues. He should have to answer for that, not simply in a political-news-cycle way, but as far as the kind of influence Ryan would have on women’s health policy in a Romney White House. (For examples of stuff that could go bye-bye if they win, see this Justice Department list.)

“Rape is rape. And the idea that we should be parsing and qualifying and slicing what types of rape we’re talking about doesn’t make sense to the American people. And [it] certainly doesn’t make sense to me.”

Republicans are just in full-on CYOA mode because they know the President has an opening on a political ground where he is stronger. And as Pema Levy of TPMnoted, this isn’t the first time one of their candidates has nuked their chances with this kind of statement. There may be a Republican or two who is objecting to Akin’s remarks on moral grounds, but it isn’t as if the party all of a sudden grew standards when it comes to anti-abortion rhetoric. Frankly, it’s been long ago made clear that Republicans couldn’t give a hot damn about the reproductive freedoms of women, whether or not they were to somehow possess the superpower to selectively reject only the sperm of rapists.

Missouri’s “Right to Pray” amendment, which passed this month, allows kids to opt out of any educational assignments that conflict with their beliefs. As the National Center for Science Education has pointed out, that means children have a legal right to refuse to participate in biology class. Or, presumably, sex ed, where they would have to learn about basic reproductive biology, a class Todd Akin apparently skipped.