Chet Orloff, a local professor and director emeritus at the Portland Historical Society, toiled on the committee that selected the four finalists. And he's evidently sensitive enough to questions about the names that he's offering an explanation this morning on TriMet's web site.

"First and foremost, this has never been a popularity contest," Orloff wrote. "We are not naming a bridge merely by numbers."

Orloff didn't address Bifröst, that Norse rainbow. But he did explain why he feels Reeves, the people's champion, would not make a suitable bridge muse.

Several people advocated, for example, that the bridge be named after Kirk Reeves. For those of us who were familiar with him, Kirk’s name is closely associated with the Hawthorne Bridge in Portland. Do people living in Tualatin, Tigard, Hillsboro, Beaverton, Aloha, Gresham, Oregon City recognize the name now and what it means? What will be Kirk’s historical and cultural significance to all of us in our region in 25, 50, 150 years? Yes, he may have represented a certain type of individual—artist, independent soul, etc.—that we like to recognize. But, so was the case with all the other individuals and couples the committee considered. I, for one (and writing as a former Regional Arts and Culture Council commissioner), would love to see Kirk’s memory celebrated with a piece of public art, perhaps a sculpture of him near where he used to play, with music emanating from it. That would manifest his memory and relate to the particular place within the city where he made his own impact.

But, when it comes to naming such an icon as a regional bridge, I believe we want a name that represents, in substantial and substantive ways, something to us all, historically, now, and in the future.