Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:55:23 -0400
Archived: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:58:54 -0500
Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point
>From: Emma Woods <e.woods33.nul>>To: post.nul>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:43:07 -0800 (PST)>Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point>>From: David Cherniack <davidc.nul>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>>>Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:46:57 -0500>>Subject: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point>>I'll confine myself to the specific ethics issue that seems>>to be at the crux of 'Emma Woods' allegations.>>She alleges that without her prior knowledge David>>Jacobs gave her post-hypnotic suggestions that she>>suffered from MPD in an attempt to throw hostile>>alien hybrids off his track.>>To support her claims, she has released highly>>abbreviated clip(s) from the hypnosis session. What>>seems to be forgotten amid the cries of foul that have>>ensued, is that, in the one statement he has released,>>he says that they talked about doing this in advance>>and she was a complicit party to the ruse.>>If true, she really has only the slimmest ethical>>grounds for complaint, and it's dubious, to say the>>least: that he used his position of authority to convince>>her to do something that was against her best interests.>>However that would be offset by her false allegation>>that she was an unwitting victim.
<snip>
>>On the other hand he has released nothing yet to>>support his counter claim. His lack of action may be for>>a number of reasons. from ethical to technical to legal>>but it shouldn't be assumed that it's because he's guilty>>of manipulating 'Emma Woods' without her knowledge.>>So until 'Emma Woods' releases the full unedited>>recording of the session from hello to goodbye (third>>party names redacted), or David Jacobs does the same,>>reasonable people should hold off from fitting him for a>>rope neck tie.>I am currently investigating the possibility of taking legal>action in regard to this issue. Once that action is concluded, I>hope to be able to release the full recordings of all my>hypnosis sessions (names and potentially identifying details>redacted.)>In the meantime, I have released the full recording of the>hypnosis session in which Dr. Jacobs implanted the hypnotic>suggestions in my mind that I had Multiple Personality Disorder>(=E2?~Elizabeth Smith's' name redacted), just to Gary Haden of the>=E2?~Speculative Realms' blog.
First of all I don't know who you are; you are attacking Jacobs
on this List and in other venues from a position of anonymity.
Presumably Jacobs knows who you are but as yet hasn't revealed
your name.
If you do proceed with legal action you will no doubt be brought
to task by the defence lawyer for your many postgs re your
relationship with Jacobs plus the release of what would be
considered evidence - not yet validated - long before proceeding
with legal action.
Should your recordings go 'viral' as they say on the internet
where hundreds of thousands of people download the tapes then
there would then be questions as to whether Jacobs could receive
a fair hearing as the accused.
I'm uncertain how this wide spread publicity surrounding your
complaints about Dave Jacobs would play out in the States but
I'm fairly certain it would considered tainted here in Canada
and in the UK. Since both the Canadian and America's legal
systems are based on British Common Law, the same might hold
true in the US.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Don Ledger
Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast
At:
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.