Saturday, January 20, 2018

As
information continues to emerge confirming that there was a ballistic
missile attack against Hawaii that was intercepted on January 13, the
investigation begins to shift from what happened, to who was
responsible. In this article, I analyze various sources describing the
attack, and identify the mysterious naval force that was most likely
responsible for launching the ballistic missile, which presumably was
nuclear armed.

In my January 17 article,
I listed three alternative news sites referring to sources that all
said that a ballistic missile was launched against Hawaii by a stealth
submarine. The alternative news sources were radio host Dr. Dave Janda, Operation Disclosure (RV/Intelligence Alert), and the Public Intelligence Blog.
The Operation Disclosure and Public Intelligence blog sites point to an
Israeli submarine as responsible, while Dr. Janda said it was a
submarine belonging to a rogue Chinese Navy faction.

Further corroboration for the ballistic missile attack explanation comes from former Forbes Magazine writer, Benjamin Fulford, who says that according to his insider sources, there was a submarine based attack:

One
sign of this extreme tension came last week when “a missile from a
cabal submarine was stopped from hitting Hawaii and the submarine was
sunk,” Pentagon sources say. Media outlets around the world have
reported that Hawaiian residents all received the following warning on
their mobile phones: “BALLISTIC MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII, SEEK
IMMEDIATE SHELTER, THIS IS NOT A DRILL,” but later this was reported to
be a false alarm. It was not—it was an attempt by “the cabal” to blame
the attack on North Korea and use it as a trigger for their long-desired
World War III, CIA sources say.

Both Fulford
and the Public Intelligence claim that the ballistic missile was
intended to simulate a North Korean attack suggesting the responsible
submarine was in the vicinity of North Korea, either in the Sea of Japan
or off the Japanese coastline.