Monday, 7 May 2012

Feeling Like a Tanner

It was the purest, most formidable expression of betrayalsufferance that we’ve ever had the opportunity of setting our eyes on.

It was clear and precise. At once we all understood
that we were before someone who has just been told mercilessly that “You’ve outlasted your use so you’re
totally dispensable”.

It takes a total lack of conscience and of principles
to tell that to someone who has significantly, under relevant risk, gone way out of his/her way
to help you out of an enormously problematic situation that his/her, altruism and
friendship are no longer of use in your favour but s/he should NEVER forget that their altruism has now become very useful to be
used against them.

That is called to be made “feel like a Tanner”. Please, not
to be confused with “doing a Tanner”.

To be made to "feel like a Tanner" is to have your friendship
and trust bent by your trusted friends in such a way that it becomes a dagger pointed
right at your heart.

We’ve lately been “blessed” with some “feeling
like a Tanner” situations.

As you know, we’re not in the habit of running
after each stick that is thrown out there for us to catch, nor do we intend of ever
having it.

This is the reason why we basically stayed quiet
during the “2012 McCann Silly Season”, which apparently diminishes in time as time passes by.

For example, last year it lasted for a little over six months, if memory
doesn’t fail me. We started to hear about it from January onwards about Kate’s book.
The show went on up until its publication, having quickly smothered down and away around
a fortnight after, when McCann’s friends and “friends” read what the silly woman
had indeed written.

This year, it started in April, I think,
with the interview to a Swedish TV, and basically, lasted as much as a autumn leaf
takes to be taken on a dry windy day. On May 4th, exactly 5 years to the day whenthe world was literally flooded with the news about Maddie’s disappearance, what did the The Sun, have
to say about it?

“THIRTY children have gone missing in Portugal
since Madeleine McCann disappeared five years ago, official figures reveal.”

And that “And yesterday the Portuguese Attorney
General Pinto Monteiro said British and Portuguese police weren’t even speaking.

He insisted there had been no formal request
for Madeleine’s case to be reopened. When asked if he was having any talks with
Brit cops he replied: “No.” “

That’s basically it. Such a disappointing little.

Or maybe not, as you’ll see. Of the little, the sub-title is
non-news because I don't think that only 5 children a year have gone
missing in Portugal since 2007, and what matters in the rest of the piece is to confirm that someone, somewhere, in Portugal or/and UK, as usual, is lying.

It’s clearly sad for the McCanns' objective of staying the longest possible in center stage that their "2012 Silly Season"
only is to last a little over a month, as it's unlikely it will go much further. The May 4th when the interview with
the disappointing Sandra Felgueiras was probably its final event. Now the issue will likely trickle back to its normal silence until next year.

There’s talk of an update of Kate’s book but
we haven’t had much feedback on the issue. If there's one thing she should have learned from
her first experience in writing is that she should never have picked up a pen again. But she did, didn’t she? Being her first experience the "diary", the disastrous book was a natural consequence and the proof that sometimes
blondes are what blondes are said to be.

If was to advise this woman about this update I
would tell her to not even think about it. She does have this amazing tendency of sticking her foot in her
mouth faster than fast, so is unlikely to miss yet another opportunity to repeat the feat with her feet.

But, although short, the "2012 Silly Season", was full of surprises. So
much so that it baffled me, which isn’t an easy thing to happen on this case as I think it and have said so many times, to be pretty simple and straightforward.

It's complexity resides solely on the diversity, both in quality and quantity, of the people involved in the cover-up. Both the involved initially and those who were "sucked" into it afterwards.

But one thing we don’t do, ever, is to underestimate
our opponents. In any situation, much less in this particular case, in which we're perfectly
aware that we're up against the best of the best, and are now finding out just how ruthless
and unprincipled they also are.

Bring expertise and intelligence together with lack of principles and conscience, and there isn’t a mightier foe. And that
is exactly what we’re up against.

So baffled as I am, let me first state the facts,
and only then try to reach some tentative conclusions about them.

First we have SY calling the PJ an incompetent
lot of idiots, because having read about a quarter of what they still have
to read they've apparently found nothing less than 195 reasons for the case not to have been
archived. Only pure malignant negligence can justify for the PJ having "overlooked" so many precious and valid leads... By the way, this says little about Leics Police who having cooperated (and we know how much...) closely with the PJ, also didn't see them or have remained strangely silent all this time.

Then we have The Sun, a 1st Division player
in the “Brit Tabloid League” unlike the "the-rag-within-rags which is the Daily Star, taking
the McCanns' side again after having, practically for one year, dropped the couple and literally
kicked them out of their pages. If you recall, between Kate’s book and up to quite recently, the McCanns
were simply non-existing in this Tabloid's pages.

Lastly we have the McCanns coming out, full
of confidence, saying that they now want to re-open the process and they want to
cooperate in the reconstruction. Two things we know would put them away behind bars
for a long time if they were ever to happen.

Three amazing facts in such short time.

And it has put many a head swirling around without
knowing what to make head or tail out of it, hasn’t it?

Yes, I did say that I was baffled, but in the astounded sense of the word and not as in being confused.

Let me say what I think is happening.

I think the UK Government is making Murdoch“feel like a Tanner”.

I think Murdoch is making the UK Government
“feel like a Tanner”.

I think the UK, namely through the SY, is making
Portugal, namely the PGR, “feel like a Tanner”.

Three “feelings like a Tanner”.

The most important one for us is the third
one.

For the world the most important are the first
two but those are above not only my comprehension as well as above my want to comprehend.

Through the Leveson Inquiry,
the UK Government basically told News International that their use was outlasted, thus the UK Government making Murdoch “feel like a Tanner”.

But Murdoch is not a Jane Tanner when it comes
to comparisons. Tanner had, and has, nothing to throw back at those who stabbed her back to the point of public tears, but Murdoch does.

So by picking up the McCanns from their anguished ashes,
and going to the extent of using both an former SY (not just any former SY) and an ex-Home Secretary
in the process (not just any former Home Secretary), Murdoch has clearly reacted.

Labour's Alan Johnson's intervention at the end of the article in The Sunappears to be clearly a "return" of favours:

"myView

By ALAN JOHNSON, Former Home Secretary

I AM not surprised there is some resentment in Portugal.
But we have to use all diplomatic channels now — including the Home Secretary ringing
her opposite number.

The Portuguese police must put all that behind them and concentrate
on one thing, and that is a little English girl who went missing.

I’m sure the Portuguese have the compassion and understanding
to put away their enmities so we can pursue these leads together."

This coming from someone who, within the UK, was supposed to be the one responsible to have done something on the issue when something should have had been done and wasn't but instead concentrated all his efforts in assuring that nothing got really done. His words are very clear about that, otherwise why speak of "resentment" and "enmities"?

To say he's being shameless, hardly qualifies the gesture.

News International is making it perfectly clear to the UK Government that their toes
are not ones to be stepped on. The line was drawn at the NOTW closure and is not to go an inch
further.

Now, why do I say that I think that Murdoch
is making the UK Government “feel like a Tanner”?

From what I could understand, as of June/July
last year, it seemed that the initial plan for the Maddie Review was to contain
the damages within the T9 (thus the worrisome faces of both Kate and Gerry during
the past year), to have News International (NI) take the blame for an exaggerated but comprehensible hype around this case, and all
would go home, happy and smiling.

And so did the Leveson Inquiry come to life. To take care of the NI part of the question. A gentle slap on the wrist was the expected.

The McCann part, was to be taken care of by the SY.

But the McCanns, as we’ve said, hold, at least an ace
up their sleeve. One impossible to go round, it seems.

So if the McCanns' heads can't be had, as apparently it can't, what is the Leveson Inquiry then to conclude?
Oh, you’ve already forgotten its existence, its purpose and that it was supposed to reach a conclusion?
So did we, don’t worry...

News International has clearly shown that it's not available to occupy the "vacant" scapegoat position left open by the McCanns. By not taking it lying down, NI is making the
UK Government “feel like a Tanner”, because it has left on their lap the now cumbersome
Leveson Inquiry, which most likely will come to an embarrassing non-conclusion and reveal to be yet another load of tax-payers' money thrown out with the window with
the bath water...

But whatever is happening between NI and the
UK is much too “conspirational” for us and it involves power struggles at a level
which we don’t wish to be acquainted with. They are like cats fighting in a bag. A grim business for democracy and the rule of law.

Let’s put our feet back on the ground and focus
on what we think is important for us: the UK, namely through the SY, making Portugal,
namely the PGR, “feel like a Tanner”.

The reasoning is simple, the logic easy to follow: the PGR, like Tanner with the Black Hats,
helped the UK out a very problematic situation. That done and overcome, it outlasted
its use to the helped party and, just like Tanner, was quickly transformed from partner into the doormat role, to be trampled upon like the obedient underdog it always was.

Now, to make someone “feel like a Tanner” you
have to hold the significant cards in your hand. In Tanner’s case, they’re all in
one blue bag.

So there must be some sort of “blue bag” which allows the
UK to humiliate the PGR as it's doing.

I imagine that it consists of documentation that would
prove the PGR’s involvement and commitment in the cover-up.

Something so compromising that makes it impossible
for the process from ever being reopened. Knowing that, isn't so easy, as we've seen to ask for something that you know beforehand it can't be provided and with the added bonus of humiliating the other side?

Remember us saying that we’d given up on the
Maddie Affair? We hope you finally understand why we said it.

So what’s new?

Well, basically the utter lack of principles. UK has dropped the mask and has shown its true face, and it's not pretty one.

We’ve become accustomed to UK’s arrogance in relation to Portugal, but to come out publicly demandingthat the process be reopened when
they well know that it can’t be is like a rerun of hearing Edgar tell Tanner that the width
of a road was just a “natural discrepancy”.

The PGR, like Tanner, did what was told, and
now, also like Tanner, is being told what to do again, or else...

Thinking about review, SY have done a more cynical job than we
thought they would. We thought they would come up with a more believable
scenario, but they know they can get away with anything and this is what
they are letting us know.

With the "195-Episode", the SY did one very important thing and that was to publicly and shamelessly commit itself to the BH side: whitewashing the cover-up.

The "establishment" has unquestionably clarified its position.

And like the hyenas they are, the McCanns
arrive at the party late and laughing. That’s why they now sound again so
confident and brag about wanting what they can’t afford to have happen, even going back to the good old days of playing with words"We NEVER wanted the case to JUST be reopened, straight off, we wanted a
REVIEW to be conducted, and that's why we campaigned for it for 3 years,
because there's no point reopening it if there's nothing to act on."....

I would like to remind the McCanns and the UK that they can't forget one
thing: to taunt a chained dog, you must make sure that the chain
will hold, otherwise you best leave the animal alone.

Bullies seldom, if ever, claim victory. They may win skirmishes and even battles, but never the war. The bullied tend to be resilient, and the Portuguese have proved in these last 5 years that they're far from giving up on the issue, independent of what their representatives and institutions may be forced to submit to.

And the PGR's attitude of denying publicly any request from Britain to reopen the process kind of leaves you with a "195-Baby" on your lap and not knowing exactly what to do with it.

And what will happen to British public opinion about the review when M is never found?

What use is democracy without Justice? Both
countries are expending young men’s and women's lives in other countries in the name of principles
we now see ruthlessly abused and that submissively accepted.

So the blog's main job continues to be continuing
heading for the truth.Undaunted and uninterrupted.

We have to make it very
difficult for SY to do a cover-up. No matter how many new leads they claim to
have found, they will have to be able to account for all the discrepancies we keep
throwing up in a constant stream.

True White Hats are already convinced by what they know
already and we are past the stage where we need to please the crowd. We have
enough readers coming back, so they must either like what we write, be afraid
of what we write, or believe themselves to be as crazy as us! If we genuinely
get it wrong, we apologise as we always do.

If you think we can be a bit crabby at
times, they can attribute it to our hormonal imbalances.

24 comments:

(this case is going to end up in the parliament, against the Mccann's whishes. It is time for the Portuguese to question why the country needs to follow instructions from a manipulated and corrupted British police. Our dignity is not under negotiation on the troika fairy tale. Rogerio Alves, who still their lawyers, is saying now that they are available for the reconstruction but he don't understand what was the use of that, after 5 years. Well, to solve a crime, is never later to do the reconstruction. And if is done 5 years later, is Mccann's fault and even for that they need to be questioned by a court: why they refused the reconstruction in 2007, if that was the step that could eliminate them from the enquiry and definitely put the police on the steps of an abductor?)

I think the 2012 farce is not over yet. With all fabricated sights and the drag in of old sights already dismissed by PJ, spannish police, Europol and Interpol, they have fuel until the end of the summer. The Metro has to justify where is going the British taxes wrongly allocated to that " single and shameful case". Today:

Comments are allowed but the amount shown( few) and the quality of them( pro) says it all- filtered comments. The big majority were not published.

What a poor exercise if that is part of the 195 Metro clues. A sight reported to happened on 6 May 2007 and reported to the police. As usual, they don't specify which police. I presume the local Spannish, the Pj and our dear friends, THE LEICESTER POLICE. 3 bumbling incompetent forces missed that sight? Really? And the German couple, who were holding the most wanted child at moment( with her face in all papers and TVs) managed to stay 2 weeks in a camping site( open eyes) to be seen by all holiday makers? Best then that, only the idea of the couple paying more to allocate an extra-child, Supported by the registration provided in the Sun. On that registration we just see the check in and the check out. The Sun wants their peculiar readers to see what is not there. And having the complete silence of the Metro, allowing that saga to still on, is bringing the SY to his misery and allowing us to question the way the SY investigate an charge people in other cases. A new name is dragged in "Karsten Mayer with a 1970 date of birth." if all the rest is fantasy, unless that is a fake name, that person exists and is real. The Sun and the witness must be called to justice to be charged with a crime of "defamation and perjury" because that person have done nothing wrong to be on the news connected with a so perverted crime. Mr. Cameron, shame on you.

No photos of Madeleine at Malaga airport, the supermercado at Alhaurin, nothing in Torremolinas yesterday.... so draw your own conclusions about how much importance has really been placed on the Spanish sightings,never backed up by a photo.

"True White Hats are already convinced by what they know already and we are past the stage where we need to please the crowd."

So true! "They" can do all the whitewashing they want, but they will never be freed of the suspicion. It will be forever a sword hanging over their heads and they won't ever enjoy a night of sound and peaceful sleep for the rest of their lives!

I don’t think Portugal is being bullied. I agree that Britain tried to bully Portugal but came out humiliated. They thought that because the mighty “Scotland Yard” said that they had found leads, that the Portuguese would wag their tails say “Yes, Master!”.I don’t know what will be the pot at the end of the rainbow for Redwood, but it hurts to see SY being humiliated to the point of calling calls from psychics and dreamers clues.For the first three of these brilliant clues, we’ve ended up on a Spanich Camping site where, who else but a Brit saw Maddie 3 days after she was abducted.Is this woman a psychic or dreamer? If she isn’t any how did she see Maddie in the camping site? Crystal ball or riding a unicorn? And if she says she saw her in the flesh, 5 years is a long time to come forward... and who and when did she report it to? The SY? But wasn’t SY just doing a review? Accepting new witnesses is not reviewing is it?If this psychic/dreamer/shameless woman is not a new witness, then it’s in the process. Where? Not on the unpublished PJ Files because that has been debunked already.And where are these 100 calls logged? They’re not in the PJ Files, so what documentation have the SY been reviewing? The process wasn’t supposed to have been run by the PJ only? There are secret documents? What kind of secret documents lead up to a Spanish camping site?I’d like to ask two final questions:1. Up to what point will SY continue to be ridiculed? They now said they have 195 new leads, so the alleged lack of cooperation from the Portuguese cannot justify that 195 new leads will result in nothing...2. Up to what point will the British allow themselves to be called the dumbest people on earth? Brits, you have to answer that yourselves, after all it is your SY, your media and your government that are insulting your intelligence with the whole world watching and reporting it.

MADDY STORY NOT DEADBy our Criminal StaffThere was rejoicing in Fleet Street last night at the news that the Madeleine McCann story might still be alive.There have been sightings of the story in the Daily Express and Daily Mail for years, but now the police have confirmed that a mock -up of the missing child could appear in all papers very prominently.Said a senior police chief-We have discovered this thing called Photoshop which PC Laptop has asked his 12 year old son to operate and which has yielded an important lead stroy. We are going to follow this up with new mock-ups at regular intervals. At last we are getting somewhere, ie Portugal, for an agreeable fact- finding trip.

In the OC log Kate is signed out as Kate Healy and also Kate Mccann, this suggests that someone else signed Kate out as Kate Mccann not being aware of Kate Healy her GP name, this would be someone not too close to Kate because they would otherwise have known different.Also on the time line Gerry is spelt Jerry again someone not close to the Mccann couple mis spelling his name with a J close friends would know it was Gerry with a G not a J. Later it is spelt with a G.I do not think the Mccanns were as close to the rest of the Tapas group as they would have us believe, Payne was the link between the Mccanns and the rest of the group.The last day the Mccanns were absent from the group, but it was Payne that visited both Kate and Gerry and supposidly the last to see Maddie alive. Its not the Tapas group its the Mccanns and the Paynes that are hiding the truth the rest of the group have somehow got dragged into this and are now too afraid to speak out afraid of the PR machine that has become team Mccann.Madeleines bed and bedroom look like a storeroom everything is pushed into the corner, no mattresses on the twins beds, did anybody ever sleep in that room?SY should have focused on a reconstruction, all their lies would have been so obvious and the abductor theory would have fallen apart.

'Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.'

Jane Tanners obvious lies, but why is nothing done about any of these fabricated stories now SY appear to be supporting the Mccanns or is it the Paynes?

Every time I see a computer generated picture of what Maddie should look like, it makes me feel that newspapers and the media are so corrupt they will print anything if enough pressure is put on them, no longer do they print facts or even the truth, they mislead the public as the Levison inquiry has shown.

Murdoch and Co have done more damage than they could ever imagine they have stopped justice for Maddie.

I’d say you’re assuming a lot from a tampered register, as we know that the crèche records are.

I associate “Healy” as Kate’s maiden name and not as her GP name, although I think it’s how she used to identify herself, professionally or otherwise, before she became “McCann” after the events.

Healy/McCann and G/J prove only that the records were tampered with and nothing else.

No one, that was involved is innocent or is to be considered as such. The crime in question is not Maddie’s demise but the subsequent cover-up. We believe, at this point in time, that the child died in result of an unfortunate accident.

Whether the McCanns and Paynes were close to whoever is irrelevant. All participated, all should be accountable.It is the whole Tapas 9 that is hiding the secrets that are “hidden”, along with the OC, the ex-Pats, and a countless number of people both in the UK and Portugal.

who signed the Creche records was probably a nanny following the instructions of her employer. That is also one of the reasons, the nannies were sent out of the country in a rush. To avoid being tight interrogated by the police and having the calligraphy tested. That nanny, was probably the same the Mccann's use to invite to Rothley when they went back to UK. She, or all of them, is framed by the Mccann's lawyers. I re-read the book "A culpa dos McCann" written by a journalist. Is one of the first books. The journalist reports on that book that the employers of the OC told him that Kate normally spends her days alone in the Swimming pool, having sunbaths without the kids. From the book, I deduced that who use to take the kids in and out of the Creche was Gerry. That could explain the mistake done on Kates name. They were used with Gerry Mccann signing but now they need an alibi for Kate and Madeleine. Then, Kate Mccann was born..... In the creche records.

Kate definitely did not sign the creche records the proof is in her name Healy and Mccann, if the Nanny did sign for Kate that could be the reason they invited her to Rothley because if it went to court her evidence would be inadmissable because she had been their guest in Uk at their expense.

This 'review' could have been a golden opportunity for SY to show their expertise in solving crimes instead Redwood has made a complete fool of SY supporting the abduction scenario and by not requesting a reconstruction.

Kate in her book is stating she believes the 'abductor' sedated ALL the children the previous day and on the night Maddie 'disappeared' how ridiculous but this does support the theory that ALL the children were sedated by the Mccanns, she is attempting to blame the abductor for what she knows they did. They also gave the twins haircuts they knew drugs could have been detected by testing their hair.On a previous thread Maddies bed was pushed against the wall but the headboard was fixed in the room and showed above the dressing table making it appear it was part of the dressing table. OC staff would not have moved the bed, why was it moved against the wall?

The arrangement of the room from where they claim Maddie disappeared, was set up before the alarm. just look at the position of the baby cots. They are an obstacle inside the room making the life not easy for a family who has to deal with 3 toddlers. Only a stupid person or somebody in absolute need will set the room like that, when they had a living room available. Or they can split the cots between the 2 rooms. The cleaner of the flat, told a Portuguese TV that when she cleaned the flat on the day before, the cots were not on that room. I presume were in a place that makes the life easy and functional to deal with small children that could wake up at night or start crying suddenly. Why, a easy access to the cots, changed for that stupid arrangement on the night their daughter disappeared? To distract the police from the real crime scene, which the dogs pointed to be the living room. They were so "focus" in taking away the attention from the living room that they didn't realize that the obstacles they create in Maddies room, were making the actions of any abductor, very difficult. was impossible for a stranger to move inside the room without bumping on all that furnitures with all obvious consequences ( noise, child's crying, scratches on the floor showing the cots sliding from one position to another and physical evidences from the abductor, even if he was wearing gloves and a cap to cover his hair. Fibers from the cloths, footprints, probably hair and even particles from his breath could be recovered. I believe, after PJ got in scene, all high technologies to find evidences were used by experts. Even if trough all that exams, the police could not identify a concrete person, at the least the exams could show the presence of a stranger and eliminate the family and their friends. Could point the way to an abduction. What we see on the files is the absence of any evidence showing the presence of a stranger. That reduces the hypothetical criminal to the group who use to easily access the flat - the family, their friends and the workers who could access the flat for maintenance or cleaning. The workers, easily the police could trace down where they were and doing what, since they have to sign ins and outs and request every work trough a inside notice ( the repair of the shutters show that procedures). Who remains without alibis, are the parents and the friends. They were recorded in Cafe Paraiso but we don't know what they have done before and after that.

I remember pj stating that Kate and Gerry were on their knees like a ritual in the room this could have been to distract the pj from observing other things in the room, it did seem odd because neither of the parents showed any emotion any other time.The blue holdall disappeared after being photographed in the wardrobe.If their mobile records could be retrieved that would reveal plenty. I believe they used the church for phoning knowing that nobody could observe or evesdrop on them, the church was their business base in pdl.

The Sun has the article dismissing the Spain camping sight. Guess which picture they use for Madeleine... Maddie with coloboma, younger then 3. That says it all about how relevant is the picture of an hypothetical 9 years old Madeleine, fabricated by the Metro police.

Joana Morais posted on her blog the video and the transcript of GA interview with Judite de Sousa in TVI. Have a look. As usual, GA exposing all the strategies of the gang and giving to the public, the picture of the review.Is the top of PJ corrupted again and bending the knees to UK? If so, shame on them. Because this bunch has also the salaries payed by the taxes of all portugugese. 99% of the Portuguese don't agree with that charade and deserve respect.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

As of Jan 19 2019 we're waiting for Jules to own the blog.

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)