Re: Customize Rogue

From:

Luc Teirlinck

Subject:

Re: Customize Rogue

Date:

Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:12:58 -0600 (CST)

>From my previous message:
That is why you need set-activate (or some alternative to it), even
after custom-setq would be implemented, *if* you are going to keep
customizations in multiple files, especially if are going to use an
automated tool, like initsplit to help you do that.
I am not so sure anymore. Custom writes into the "official"
custom-file to save the option. Is it not the job of the automated
tool to now redirect this to the file it wants it redirected to and
make things function properly? Is any other behavior not just a bug
in the automated tool? In other words I now again believe that
custom-setq would make set-activate unnecessary.
Sincerely,
Luc.