"I was somewhat surprised (but pleased) at the level of interest back when I published my Windows Vista - 90 Day Vulnerability Report. It was about the earliest span of time I thought might give us some indicators, and the indicators did look good. Six months is a much more interesting time frame, and gives us the opportunity to see if the early trend indicators are holding up, or if the early signs of progress were a short-term gain."

This is just more "get the facts" FUD. I am sure there are countless vulnerabilities hidden in that bloated Vista code. A comparison of Linux and Vista code would be very amusing, but of course, MS would never show us that mess.

Supreme Dragon, just for one day I'd love to see you try to eliminate the words "Vista" and "FUD" and "Pathetic (et al)" from your vocabulary. Better yet, just stop participating (and I use that word very loosely in this case) in Windows-centric threads period.

IF MS would finally releases a quality OS, and stop abusing their customers, people would not have much to complain about. But of course, that will obviously never happen, they would rather try to force people to buy DRM infected garbage at ridiculous prices, and spread "get the facts" lies and patent propaganda.

Linux code is available for all to see, and Linux has an impressive record of stability, reliability, security and performance. MS won't show the code and the reason just might be embarrassment. Windows has a horrible record of shoddy quality, and the DRM and frightening EULA makes Windows an even more wretched choice. To even suggest that Windows code could possibly match Linux is hilariously nonsensical.