# What did you learn (concept &/or technology) that you intend to apply in your library, institution or professional practice? Provide details! (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%)

+

:*What did you learn (concept &/or technology) that you intend to apply in your library, institution or professional practice? Provide details! (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%)

−

# When you look back on your accomplishments during ALA Library 2.0, what pleases you the most? (25 of 33 people answered; response rate = 76%)

+

:*When you look back on your accomplishments during ALA Library 2.0, what pleases you the most? (25 of 33 people answered; response rate = 76%)

−

# Please tell us of any other ways that ALA Library 2.0 has affected your approach to your work and plans for the future, or use this space to share anything else ALA L2.0 related that we didn't think to ask about. (20 of 33 people answered; response rate = 61 %; this lower response rate may be explained by this question’s penultimate location in the survey.)

+

:*Please tell us of any other ways that ALA Library 2.0 has affected your approach to your work and plans for the future, or use this space to share anything else ALA L2.0 related that we didn't think to ask about. (20 of 33 people answered; response rate = 61 %; this lower response rate may be explained by this question’s penultimate location in the survey.)

#Who helped? Tell us about the people who were especially helpful as resources, whether team members, learning directors, members, colleagues or others. Provide names and examples of how they helped. (25 of 33 people answered; response rate = 76%; multiple answers were provided)

+

:*Who helped? Tell us about the people who were especially helpful as resources, whether team members, learning directors, members, colleagues or others. Provide names and examples of how they helped. (25 of 33 people answered; response rate = 76%; multiple answers were provided)

−

#As we plan for the next iteration of ALA Library 2.0, what suggestions do you have for us regarding program length, structure, workload, project selection, team leaders, team formation, collaboration norms, technical support, opening or closing sessions, or any other elements? (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%)

+

:*As we plan for the next iteration of ALA Library 2.0, what suggestions do you have for us regarding program length, structure, workload, project selection, team leaders, team formation, collaboration norms, technical support, opening or closing sessions, or any other elements? (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%)

−

#What suggestions do you have for how we can better handle the program's technological instruction component? (24 of 33 people answered; response rate = 73%)

+

:*What suggestions do you have for how we can better handle the program's technological instruction component? (24 of 33 people answered; response rate = 73%)

−

#If you could invite anyone, anywhere to participate in the next iteration of ALA Library 2.0, whom would you ask? (18 of 33 people answered; response rate = 55%. This lower response rate may be explained by this question’s location as the last one in the survey; however, multiple answers were provided by many respondents.)

+

:*If you could invite anyone, anywhere to participate in the next iteration of ALA Library 2.0, whom would you ask? (18 of 33 people answered; response rate = 55%. This lower response rate may be explained by this question’s location as the last one in the survey; however, multiple answers were provided by many respondents.)

−

3.3 Do you want to remain on your team for 2 to 3 more months to continue working on your project or to tackle a new project? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 47% (14) were willing to continue working with their team; 13% (4) wanted to work on other ideas, and 40% (12) declined.)

+

:*Do you want to remain on your team for 2 to 3 more months to continue working on your project or to tackle a new project? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 47% (14) were willing to continue working with their team; 13% (4) wanted to work on other ideas, and 40% (12) declined.)

−

4.1 Would receiving continuing education units for ALA Library 2.0 be of value to you? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 30% said yes, 13% weren’t sure, and 57% said no)

+

:*Would receiving continuing education units for ALA Library 2.0 be of value to you? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 30% (9) said yes, 13% (4) weren’t sure, and 57%(17) said no)

−

4.2 If a future iteration of ALA Library 2.0 provided a graduate credit option (for a fee) would you be interested in taking a longer version of the program for credit? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 23% said yes, 17% weren’t sure, and 60% said no)

+

:*If a future iteration of ALA Library 2.0 provided a graduate credit option (for a fee) would you be interested in taking a longer version of the program for credit? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 23% (7) said yes, 17% (5) weren’t sure, and 60% (18)said no)

−

Do you want to remain on your team for 2-3 more months to continue working on your project? If yes, provide your e-mail address and team #. What resources will you need?

+

:*Do you want to remain on your team for 2-3 more months to continue working on your project? Those who answered ''other'' were asked to explain. (24 of 33 people answered; response rate = 73%; of those who responded, 50% (12) said yes, 33% (8) said no, and 17% (4) wanted to continue in a capacity they described.)

−

Those who answered ''other'' were asked to explain. (24 of 33 people answered; response rate = 73%; of those that responded, 50% (12) said yes, 33% (8) said no, and 17% (4) wanted to continue in a capacity they described.

+

:*Are you willing to be interviewed for 45 minutes to an hour about your ALA Library 2.0 experience? (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%; 17, or 61% of those who answered were willing to be interviewed)

−

5.1 Are you willing to be interviewed for 45 minutes to an hour about your ALA Library 2.0 experience? (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%; 17, or 61% of those who answered were willing to be interviewed)

Revision as of 22:39, 19 January 2007

What did you learn (concept &/or technology) that you intend to apply in your library, institution or professional practice? Provide details! (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%)

When you look back on your accomplishments during ALA Library 2.0, what pleases you the most? (25 of 33 people answered; response rate = 76%)

Please tell us of any other ways that ALA Library 2.0 has affected your approach to your work and plans for the future, or use this space to share anything else ALA L2.0 related that we didn't think to ask about. (20 of 33 people answered; response rate = 61 %; this lower response rate may be explained by this question’s penultimate location in the survey.)

What was/were the most difficult or challenging aspect(s) of ALA Library 2.0? (27 of 33 people answered; response rate = 82%)

Who helped? Tell us about the people who were especially helpful as resources, whether team members, learning directors, members, colleagues or others. Provide names and examples of how they helped. (25 of 33 people answered; response rate = 76%; multiple answers were provided)

As we plan for the next iteration of ALA Library 2.0, what suggestions do you have for us regarding program length, structure, workload, project selection, team leaders, team formation, collaboration norms, technical support, opening or closing sessions, or any other elements? (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%)

What suggestions do you have for how we can better handle the program's technological instruction component? (24 of 33 people answered; response rate = 73%)

If you could invite anyone, anywhere to participate in the next iteration of ALA Library 2.0, whom would you ask? (18 of 33 people answered; response rate = 55%. This lower response rate may be explained by this question’s location as the last one in the survey; however, multiple answers were provided by many respondents.)

Do you want to remain on your team for 2 to 3 more months to continue working on your project or to tackle a new project? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 47% (14) were willing to continue working with their team; 13% (4) wanted to work on other ideas, and 40% (12) declined.)

Would receiving continuing education units for ALA Library 2.0 be of value to you? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 30% (9) said yes, 13% (4) weren’t sure, and 57%(17) said no)

If a future iteration of ALA Library 2.0 provided a graduate credit option (for a fee) would you be interested in taking a longer version of the program for credit? (30 of 33 people answered; response rate = 91%; of those who responded, 23% (7) said yes, 17% (5) weren’t sure, and 60% (18)said no)

Do you want to remain on your team for 2-3 more months to continue working on your project? Those who answered other were asked to explain. (24 of 33 people answered; response rate = 73%; of those who responded, 50% (12) said yes, 33% (8) said no, and 17% (4) wanted to continue in a capacity they described.)

Are you willing to be interviewed for 45 minutes to an hour about your ALA Library 2.0 experience? (28 of 33 people answered; response rate = 85%; 17, or 61% of those who answered were willing to be interviewed)