How do you define fascism. Who is a fascist. And how do you identify.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HurricaneDitka
View Post
I doubt you and I agree enough about who the fascists are in modern-day America to make an answer to that question worthwhile, and besides that, my position on fascists isn't the topic of the thread, your (general you, I have no idea if you personally identify with Antifa or not) dead Antifa comrade is.

Please, oh please. DO tell us your definition of fascist/fascism, who you think ARE fascist, and how you identify. I'll post a non pit thread for you to ignore shortly.

I've looked at the official definition of fascism and found it kind of convoluted.

To me fascism is a response to feeling threatened by things like foreign threats, economic collapse, minorities, terrorism, etc. It's a strict, authoritarian, right wing movement that believes strongly in social hierarchies and being as strong and ruthless as possible in the face of external and internal threats. They want to purge domestic weakness and strengthen the police and military to deal with threats. Civil liberties are seen as inviting weakness in.

There is also the argument that a nation's level of pathogens helps predict how fascist it is prone to becoming. The argument is that the fear of infectious diseases make people naturally conformist and afraid of outsiders as a built in method of preventing disease spread. These attitudes make a society ripe for fascism.

The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable". [...] Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. [...] Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.

Fascism is a totalitarian dictatorship. It's a system where the government is absolute and controls all aspects of society.

Fascism is militaristic. It believes that war is a good thing for society. (Although in some cases, the fascist regime will recognize its limitations and accept that it's not strong to attack other countries. So it will talk a lot about war but not follow through.)

Fascism is based on a cult of personality. It says that the leader of the nation is at a level above ordinary men and is entitled to blind and total obedience and veneration.

Fascism is nationalistic. It believes that there is a group of people who are inherently superior to everyone else and that these people should rule over everyone else.
5

Hateful = focusing national animosity on a cultural minority, malicious & misleading propaganda, generally nasty personal disposition appealing to anti-intellectuals
Bossy = telling someone else what to do, totalitarian
Jerks = the sort of people who are not allowed to post here. HD, Shodan, and I are not jerks. SA was. pimpdaddylongstroke & Thaidog were just weird.
6

A fascist is someone who believes that access to political processes and markets, and protection by the state should be based on racial and cultural identity. When a fascist speaks of democracy s/he sees it as limited to those of a certain race/culture. The state exists to advance the agenda of the preferred race and to protect it from the undesirable races. When people from undesirable races step out of line, the state should come down hard on them. To the extent that other races are allowed to exist, it is to serve the needs of the preferred race.

ETA: fascism is often characterized by wildly conflicting ideologies and belief in conspiracy theories to explain away those conflicting beliefs.
7

To me fascism is about ultra-conformity. it's about making sure that everyone stays in their culturally-defined role, by force if necessary. A dictator is not completely necessary. We all know how oppressive a community can be to those who "get uppity." I hear people ask, "How could anyone be in favor of fascism?" Well, those in charge sure love any system that is all about keeping them in charge. But it extends throughout a culture. Favored groups can act in a fascist nature too, when they choose leaders to enforce the status quo or oppress those trying to change the situation. I am always wary of anyone whose politics is based on The Way It Used To Be. This is someone from a favored group trying to push down at those trying to rise up from lower down the pyramid. Fascists have traditionally harnessed this to push their agenda. Sowing fear among the voters of hated minorities who are gaining "at the expense of us good people."

Isn't it funny that the higher you go in the pyramid, the more morally acceptable the pyramid becomes.
8

__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

Another factor, besides authoritarian and militaristic nationalism, usually coupled with strict defined social roles and sometimes a traditionalist religiosity (or an invented set of rituals aping the religious), is the common characteristic of a lot of bullies - playing on their perceived sense of grievance to get their martyrdom in first, so as to plead justification for whatever they do later to their victims.
9

Fascism is a totalitarian dictatorship. It's a system where the government is absolute and controls all aspects of society.

Fascism is militaristic. It believes that war is a good thing for society. (Although in some cases, the fascist regime will recognize its limitations and accept that it's not strong to attack other countries. So it will talk a lot about war but not follow through.)

Fascism is based on a cult of personality. It says that the leader of the nation is at a level above ordinary men and is entitled to blind and total obedience and veneration.

Fascism is nationalistic. It believes that there is a group of people who are inherently superior to everyone else and that these people should rule over everyone else.

This seems like a fairly decent definition. And I would say a person who wants all those things is a "fascist"
10

... To too many on the Left, "fascist" is just the latest smear for everyone they don't like.

I think that accurately reflects how the word is most often used today in modern American political discourse.

If you want a dictionary definition, this one is as good as any:

Quote:

Fascism is a form of radical right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

Quote:

Originally Posted by snfaulkner

... who you think ARE fascist...

Benito Mussolini, to offer one prominent historical example.

Quote:

Originally Posted by snfaulkner

and how you identify. ...

I identify as someone who hates identity politics. If I must label myself, I consider myself to be a conservative and a capitalist, and don't really have any sympathy for early 20th-century Italian dictators that got lined up against a wall and shot.
18

Fascism is a totalitarian dictatorship. It's a system where the government is absolute and controls all aspects of society.

Fascism is militaristic. It believes that war is a good thing for society. (Although in some cases, the fascist regime will recognize its limitations and accept that it's not strong to attack other countries. So it will talk a lot about war but not follow through.)

Fascism is based on a cult of personality. It says that the leader of the nation is at a level above ordinary men and is entitled to blind and total obedience and veneration.

Fascism is nationalistic. It believes that there is a group of people who are inherently superior to everyone else and that these people should rule over everyone else.

Fascism is a form of radical right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe

Are you for or against that type of radical right-wing, authoritarian ultranationalism?
20

Thanks, no. Over the years, I have encountered a few genuine fascists. We're talking real American neo-Nazis and their Eastern European kin. I don't like them or support their ideals. In the wonderful world of internet social media, though, the word is applied to anybody politically to the right of the writer or just to authoritarian regimes in general. It is now just a smear word, whatever its dictionary meaning.
26

It is interesting how may posters' definition of fascism includes "right wing" when the overwhelming historical examples that most everyone will agree as being fascist (Nazi Germany, USSR, Red China, Prewar Italy) were overwhelmingly "left". It seems to me that fascism requires socialism to work. Even the Spanish Inquisition depended on the Catholic Church, certainly a leftist organization based on leftist ideals (particularly for the time).

Quote:

Originally Posted by jz78817

"fascists" are anyone who have political beliefs different from mine.

/s

This really appears to the only accurate (and neutral) definition.
He got it right.
32

With regards to leftism, socialism was "in" at the time so at least the Nazis and Fascists (not sure about Franco) had to have the trappings of socialism but did not deliver on most of it, and indeed purged the actual socialists from their ranks in the case of Germany.
34

It is interesting how may posters' definition of fascism includes "right wing" when the overwhelming historical examples that most everyone will agree as being fascist (Nazi Germany, USSR, Red China, Prewar Italy) were overwhelmingly "left". It seems to me that fascism requires socialism to work. Even the Spanish Inquisition depended on the Catholic Church, certainly a leftist organization based on leftist ideals (particularly for the time).

This really appears to the only accurate (and neutral) definition.
He got it right.

1) Ah, this old argument. The vertical axis on the Political Compass was more important in this case; you're conflating fascism with authoritarianism. The Nazis were not purely right wing, but they rose with the help of right wing movements and in opposition to leftism.

2) The Spanish Inquisition was under the control of the Spanish monarchs, and done without the influence of Rome.
37

Furthermore, outside the areas of the formal Inquisition, the church often was more interested in protecting the Jews specifically than the common people were, at least paying lip service to their right to exist rather than cheering on the murderous mobs.
38

Communism (i.e. what Marx originally envisioned) has never existed on national scale, it simply can't work. I don't think it can ever work for anything bigger than, say, a neighborhood. And yes, I know the ruling parties of most of those countries (whether still existing or not) called themselves some form of "Communist Party," that doesn't make them so. Just like North Korea is not a democracy simply because they call themselves the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea." A ruling class which enforces their power at gunpoint is pretty much the opposite of communism.

North Korea probably is more fascist than communist at this point. They even make racial purity a major part of their program, and unlike communist nations that at least give lip service to social egalitarianism, North Korea has strict social hierarchies.

Of the 5 communist nations on earth, I don't know if any are truly communist anymore.
40

It is interesting how may posters' definition of fascism includes "right wing" when the overwhelming historical examples that most everyone will agree as being fascist (Nazi Germany, USSR, Red China, Prewar Italy) were overwhelmingly "left". It seems to me that fascism requires socialism to work. Even the Spanish Inquisition depended on the Catholic Church, certainly a leftist organization based on leftist ideals (particularly for the time).

excavating reminded me of another feature of fascism: a profoundly ignorant populace that accepts rewritten history as fact (see any Texas history textbook on slavery, or randomly turn on Fox News).
44

I wouldn't agree that USSR and Red China were fascist. While they were bad enough that it's even debatable whether they were better or worse than Nazi Germany, that doesn't make them fascist.

I agree.

Communist regimes are certainly totalitarian dictatorships. And they have had periods when they had cults of personality (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro).

But communist regimes aren't overtly militaristic. They claim that peace is their goal. I realize they often stray away from that goal but so do western democracies. The point is that they present peace as a positive and war as a negative. Fascist regimes do the opposite.

Communist regimes also lack the belief in inherent tribalism that is a central pillar of fascism. Communism claims to be a universal ideology in which everyone is potentially welcome and equal. In an ideal communist world, everyone would be a communist. This is not true of fascism; fascist believed that there is one group that is better than everyone else and that people who are outside of this group can never enter in. Communists believe you can convert people into communists; fascists believe outsiders can't be converted to insiders and must therefore be subjugated or eliminated.
45

The primary component of fascism in my view is authoritarianism. That can come from anywhere - the desire to control others isn't monopolized by the left or right.

Disagree. There is an authoritarian left but generally there are major differences between right wing and left wing authoritarianism.

Right wing tends to be nationalistic, while left wing doesn't believe in national borders.
Right wing believes in racial and gender heirarchies, left wingers generally do not (at least nominally)
Right wing authoritarians tend to be friendly to powerful corporations, left wing ones are not
etc.

Fascism is more right wing authoritarianism, motivated by a sense of defenselessness in the face of domestic and foreign threats.

And not all authoritarian regimes are ideological. I wouldn't personally consider the dictatorship in Syria to be either right or left wing. A lot of dictatorships are just about maintaining the power and status of the dictator and their inner circle, not about any political ideology. Personally I'd consider Islamic extremist groups fascist (like Al Qaeda or ISIL), North Korea is arguably fascist, and the resurgence of neofascism in Europe & the US in response to globalization and islamic migration is fascist too. But its nothing like Venezuela which is a different kind of authoritarian regime.
46

Communist regimes are certainly totalitarian dictatorships. And they have had periods when they had cults of personality (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro).

But communist regimes aren't overtly militaristic. They claim that peace is their goal. I realize they often stray away from that goal but so do western democracies. The point is that they present peace as a positive and war as a negative. Fascist regimes do the opposite.

Communist regimes also lack the belief in inherent tribalism that is a central pillar of fascism. Communism claims to be a universal ideology in which everyone is potentially welcome and equal. In an ideal communist world, everyone would be a communist. This is not true of fascism; fascist believed that there is one group that is better than everyone else and that people who are outside of this group can never enter in. Communists believe you can convert people into communists; fascists believe outsiders can't be converted to insiders and must therefore be subjugated or eliminated.

I forgot another major difference between communist regimes and fascist regimes; their temporal orientation.

Fascist regimes present a mythological and pseudohistorical basis for their legitimacy. They will claim to be the successors of some past golden age who are trying to revive that golden age.

Communist regimes present a pseudoscientific basis for their legitimacy. They will claim they are making a clean break with the past and are moving forward into an ideal future as something new.
49

ST's vBulletin 3 Responsive Styles

Our newly refreshed styles in 2017, brings the old vb3 to the new level, responsive and modern feel. It comes with 3 colors with or without sidebar, fixed sized or fluid. Default vbulletin 3 style made responsive also available in the pack.
Purchase Our Style Pack Now