Mor ethan likely they get the normal color version as wel as the edited one. Thats how i do it at least.

I would hope so! than to be stuck a crappy style that some dude thought was a great 'style' last decade. Is that like ugly is the new beautiful? I recall another photographer on these forums posted his wedding pics that were shot on his brand new 5d3, they were overly hazy and was discussing that the client was so pissed off they demanded the RAW files and their money back for ruining their wedding pics. We are partly responsible for promoting what good looks like. Soon enough other are going to want it. A gain I must apologize for being honest here. I cant tell you how many times i have see lightroom filters for sale and wonder why would anyone want their pics to look like that. We are going to get over this Instagram mentality and to me the sooner the better. BTW my comments in this post are not about the photographs posted here. Its about wedding photography in general.

Just my opinion... I guess you're also "stuck" with the thoughts that everybody just want the "standard" way of photography. There are no said rules about how wedding photography should look like. Wedding photography just like any photography is considered as an ART. ART is a very subjective topic. Your interpretation might not be the same as mine. I think the final judgement would still be from the client themselves who paid for it. If you think going "standard" is your style, then go for it. As for some here who are orthodox in their style, I don't think they are wrong either. To each their own... Just like fashion (and art), standards will change from time-to-time.

On the last two of the bride, near pool table and out doors...she's a bit heavy set, and my thoughts are that posing her and shooting up at her from below, accentuates her largeness a bit, where the same thing shot maybe from higher,and maybe get her to kick her weight and hip back from the camera might be a little more flattering to her figure?