Abstract

Background

Four of five Plasmodium species infecting humans are present in Madagascar. Plasmodium vivax remains the second most prevalent species, but is understudied. No data is available on its susceptibility to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, the drug recommended for intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy. In this study, the prevalence of P. vivax infection and the polymorphisms in the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes were investigated. The correlation between these polymorphisms and clinical and parasitological responses was also investigated in P. vivax-infected patients.

Methods

Plasmodium vivax clinical isolates were collected in eight sentinel sites from the four major epidemiological areas for malaria across Madagascar in 2006/2007. Pvdhfr and pvdhps genes were sequenced for polymorphism analysis. The therapeutic efficacy of SP in P. vivax infections was assessed in Tsiroanomandidy, in the foothill of the central highlands. An intention-to-treat analysis of treatment outcome was carried out.

Results

A total of 159 P. vivax samples were sequenced in the pvdhfr/pvdhps genes. Mutant-types in pvdhfr gene were found in 71% of samples, and in pvdhps gene in 16% of samples. Six non-synonymous mutations were identified in pvdhfr, including two novel mutations at codons 21 and 130. For pvdhps, beside the known mutation at codon 383, a new one was found at codon 422. For the two genes, different combinations were ranged from wild-type to quadruple mutant-type. Among the 16 patients enrolled in the sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine clinical trial (28 days of follow-up) and after adjustment by genotyping, 3 (19%, 95% CI: 5%–43%) of them were classified as treatment failure and were pvdhfr 58R/117N double mutant carriers with or without the pvdhps 383G mutation.

Conclusion

This study highlights (i) that genotyping in the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes remains a useful tool to monitor the emergence and the spread of P. vivax sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistant in order to improve the national antimalarial drug policy, (ii) the issue of using sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as a monotherapy for intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women or children.

Background

Plasmodium vivax remains the second most common cause of malaria in the world, infecting more than 80 million people annually. It is the most geographically widespread malaria parasite and it is found throughout South and Central America, Asia, the Middle East and parts of Africa [1].

Malaria is endemic throughout Madagascar, except in highland regions above 1,500 m. Plasmodium falciparum is the dominant malaria species, but P. vivax and Plasmodium malariae have an increased prevalence in the foothills of the central highlands [2, 3]. With over one million suspected cases reported in 2005, malaria remains one of the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the country [4–6]. Although P. vivax causes less mortality than P. falciparum, it is responsible for significant morbidity and economic loss.

For the past 50 years, chloroquine was used as the first line treatment for malaria in Madagascar, with SP the second line treatment choice. In 2005, the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) decided to revise its treatment policy, replacing CQ by artemisinin-based combination therapy (AQ+AS, a combination of artesunate plus amodiaquine) and recommending SP for intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women (IPTp) [7]. Some studies in vivo [8] and in vitro [9–11] have investigated the susceptibility of P. falciparum to this drug, but no data concerning the susceptibility of P. vivax to SP is available. Molecular and epidemiological studies have clearly shown that, as for P. falciparum, the major mechanism of resistance to SP involves specific point mutations in the dhfr (dihydrofolate reductase) and dhps (dihydropteroate synthase) genes of the parasite. In total, 20 non-synonymous mutations have already been described in the pvdhfr gene [12]. Some of these mutations (at codons 57, 58, 61, 117 and 173) are involved in resistance to pyrimethamine [12]. Five mutations have already been identified in the pvdhps gene, at codons 382, 383, 512, 553 and 585, corresponding to positions 436, 437, 540, 581 and 613 of the homologous gene in P. falciparum. No data is available about polymorphism in the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes of malaria parasites from Madagascar. Only one pvdhfr gene mutation, at codon 33, has been identified in some isolates (four of nine from Madagascar and the Comoro Islands), but this mutation has not been reported to be associated with clinical resistance or resistance in vitro [13, 14].

Since, it is difficult to monitor the susceptibility of P. vivax to antimalarial drugs by in vitro tests [15], molecular markers of drug resistance are useful tools for mapping the current and changing pattern of SP-resistant P. vivax isolates. The aims of this study were: (i) to assess polymorphisms in the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes, using 159 P. vivax samples, and (ii) to correlate pvdhfr/pvdhps patterns with clinical and parasitological responses in P. vivax-infected patients.

The primary end point was therapeutic response, based on parasitological and clinical cure by day 28, according to the 2001 WHO protocol [16]. Therapeutic response was classified as "treatment failure" (TF; clinical deterioration due to P. vivax illness requiring hospitalization, with parasitaemia and axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C any time between days 3 and 28, or parasitaemia on any day between days 7 and 28, regardless of clinical conditions) or "adequate clinical and parasitological response" (ACPR; absence of parasitaemia on day 28 without the criteria for TF previously being met). Patients with treatment failure were treated with artesunate (4 mg/kg on days 0, 1, and 2) plus amodiaquine (10 mg/kg on days 0, 1, and 2); however, their response to repeat therapy was not assessed.

Molecular genotyping techniques were used to distinguish recrudescences from reinfections for patients with treatment failure after day 7. Briefly, blood samples collected on the day of enrolment, on day 1 and on the day of treatment failure were analysed by sequencing for polymorphisms in the genes for circumsporozoïte protein (pvcsp) [17] and merozoite surface protein-3 (pvmsp3) [18] and for six different microsatellite markers [19, 20] (Table 1). Microsatellite PCR products were size-genotyped by using a standard-size Genescan 500 LIZ on an ABI Prism 3730XL. The genotyping patterns on the day of failure were compared with those at treatment initiation and on day 1. An outcome was defined as recrudescence if all alleles present at the time of failure were present at the time of treatment initiation or on day 1, and defined as a reinfection otherwise.

Table 1

Primer sequences of the microsatellite markers used for differentiating recrudescences from reinfections in paired samples from enrolled patients with treatment failure after day 7.

Micro satellite markers

Motif

External PCR

Internal PCR

Label

14.185§

AT

F: TGCAGATATGCTGTCGAAT

F: GCAGTTGTTGCAGATTGAGC

6FAM

R: GGGAAAAACTTGGTCACAC

R: TAAGGCGTGCACGTTATCAT

8.332§

AT

F: TGAAGCAATATAGCGATGAC

F: CCTCGATGGTGATGTGATGA

HEX

R: CGGTGTAGTGTGGTACAATG

R: GTATAACATGGCACCCGACCT

6.34§

AC

F: CCCAATTAAGTGCAAATCA

F: TGAGCGCTTTAAGCTTCTGC

6FAM

R: CATGTAAAGAGGCACATGG

R: CAAAAATGAATCGTGGCACA

2.21§

AC

F: GGCAGGAACGTAGAGGAG

F: CCATCTGCTCAAATCCGAAG

6FAM

R: GGCTTGTTCATTTTGAGGTA

R: GGCTCCTCCCTGTCTCTGTAG

AY391734#

CA

F: TACCCCAGCCTTATCTCTC

F: TTTTCCCTTCGGAAAAACG

6FAM

R: AAATGCACAGACACTACGC

R: ACGACCATCACCTGCCATAG

AY391740#

AC

F: ATTTGTGTATGCCTTGTGTT

F: GTTTACCAGGCCCAATTCAC

HEX

R: GTGAGGGTGTCTATCCGTA

R: GTTCACACGGGCGTATACAT

§ microsatellites sequences described by Imwong et al, 2006 [20]

# microsatellites sequences described by Leclerc et al, 2004 [19]

Primers sequences were designed by primer3 software [39]

F: forward primer

R: reverse primer

The secondary end points were (i) fever clearance time, defined as the time (days) from initiation of treatment to the end of fever (i.e., patient remaining afebrile, based on reported history, with an axillary temperature of <37.5°C on a given day of follow-up); (ii) parasite clearance time, defined as the time (days) from the initiation of treatment to parasite clearance (defined as the moment when parasite counts fell below the detection threshold for microscopy) and (iii) haematological recovery, defined as being cured on day 28, with a haemoglobin level greater than that on day 0.

An intention-to-treat analysis of treatment outcome was carried out. Frequencies were compared using chi-squared tests, and continuous variables were compared using Student's t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests, as appropriate. All reported p-values are for two-tailed tests and were considered statistically significant if less than 0.05.

Results

Prevalence of P. vivax infections

From January to October 2006 and March to July 2007, 8,363 patients were screened by using RDT. Among these patients, the global prevalence of P. vivax infections was estimated at 6.3% (135 cases) of all malaria infections by microscopy. Considerable heterogeneity was observed between the different study areas and prevalence ranged from zero in Andapa to 17.5% in Tsiroanomandidy (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Map of Madagascar showing the distribution ofP. vivaxisolates from each study area.

Analysis of the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes

159 P. vivax samples, corresponding to the 135 cases completed with 24 collected in the same conditions, were sequenced on pvdhfr/pvdhps genes (Figure 1). A large proportion of these samples (71%, 113/159) had at least one mutation on the pvdhfr gene; this proportion ranged from 18% in Ejeda (2/11) to 100% in Ihosy and Farafangana (1/1). These samples displayed non-synonymous mutations at six residues, including four mutations known to be responsible for pyrimethamine resistance (P33L, C49R, S58R and S117N) and two previously unknown mutations (P21S and N130K). The most prevalent mutant-type alleles were S58R (58%) and S117N (63.5%), particularly for study sites on the western side of Madagascar. The mutant P33L allele, which has been reported to be specific to Madagascar, was found in only 6% of isolates and was not restricted to any particular area. The fourth mutation, C49R, was present in 3% of the isolates and was limited to Maevatanana. The two new non-synonymous mutations, P21S and N130K, were identified in two and 50 isolates, respectively, at only two sites (Miandrivazo and Tsiroanomandidy). An additional synonymous mutation was detected at amino-acid 15 (gca → gcg) in 69 samples (43%). No variation in the number of repeats was observed in the polymorphic region between nucleotides 262 and 309 [25].

Non-synonymous mutations were found at two residues of the pvdhps gene, in 25 of the 159 isolates: 24 samples (15%) displayed the A383G mutant allele and one sample (0.6%) the C422R mutant allele. No mutant alleles were found at southern sites and such alleles were surprisingly rare in Miandrivazo (3%), despite 83% of the isolates from this site having mutant alleles of the pvdhfr gene. Based on the pvdhps tandem repeat region located between amino-acid residues 603 to 658 of the reference sequence, nine different genotypes, including the reference genotype, were identified. All the A383G mutant-type isolates were from the same genotype. These changes and the corresponding positions of mutations in pvdhfr and pvdhps are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Frequency distribution of mutant-type alleles for DHFR and DHPS domains in 159 Malagasy isolates collected from 7 sites in 2006–2007

P. vivax dhfr polymorphism

P. vivax dhps polymorphism

Sampling site

No. of isolates

No. of mutant isolates (%)

Amino-acid residue

No. of mutant isolates (%)

Amino-acid residue

P21S

P33L

C49R

S58R

S117N

N130K

A383G

C422R

South

Ejeda

11

2 (18)

-

1

-

1

1

-

0 (0)

0

0

Ihosy

1

1 (100)

-

-

-

-

1

-

0 (0)

0

0

West

Miandrivazo

60

50 (83)

1

1

-

43

47

44

2 (3)

1

1

Maevatanana

22

14 (64)

-

2

5

12

12

-

8 (36)

8

0

Central Highlands

Tdd

59

42 (71)

1

4

-

33

37

6

11 (19)

11

0

Moramanga

5

3 (60)

-

1

-

2

2

-

3 (60)

3

0

East

Farafangana

1

1 (100)

-

-

-

1

1

-

1 (100)

1

0

Total

159

113 (71)

2 (1.3)

9 (5.7)

5 (3.1)

92 (57.9)

101 (63.5)

50 (31.4)

25 (16)

24 (15)

1 (0.6)

Residues displaying new mutations are indicated in bold typeface

Tdd: Tsiroanomandidy

In total, 15 different genotypes were identified, as presented in Table 3, including wild-type and single, double or triple mutant-types in for pvdhfr and the wild-type or single mutants for pvdhps. Only 27.7% of the 159 isolates sequenced were wild-type for both genes, and all but two of the parasites with mutant genotypes for pvdhps (98.7%) also had mutant genotypes for pvdhfr. Four single mutant allele genotypes were observed for pvdhfr, but none of these genotypes was ever associated with mutation in the pvdhps gene. In the double-mutant genotype, the 130K mutation was combined with 33L or 117N mutations in the pvdhfr gene, in the absence of mutation in the pvdhps gene. The pvdhfr 58R/117N double mutant accounted for 25.8% of isolates, 10.1% of which also had the A383G mutation in the pvdhps gene. Finally, two triple-mutant pvdhfr genotypes were observed, with and without mutations in the pvdhps gene. The 49R/58R/117N genotype was found only in Maevatanana, whereas the 58R/117N/130K genotype was found mostly in Miandrivazo and Tsiroanomandidy.

Clinical and parasitological response to SP

Clinical and parasitological monitoring was complete up to day 28 for 15 of the 16 patients enrolled in the clinical study of SP efficacy. Nine of these 16 patients were male and seven were female (43.4%). They were aged from nine months to 42 years (median 7.5 years), and had a median weight of 16.5 kg (range 7.5 to 52.5). Fifteen patients (93.8%) had suffered fever during the 48 hours immediately preceding enrolment and one declared having taken antimalarial drugs (tetracycline). Neither microscopy nor real-time PCR showed mixed infections (P. vivax with other species). The geometric mean of asexual parasite count was 3,353 parasites/μL (range 500 to 21,500) at baseline. None of the patients had detectable gametocytes on microscopy at day 0 or during follow-up. Mean haemoglobin concentration was 7.5 g/dL on day 0, and the mean increase in haemoglobin concentration observed on day 28 was 1.3 g/dL. Eleven patients successfully cleared P. vivax parasitaemia after SP treatment, whereas four patients presented a reoccurrence of parasitaemia on days 14, 21 or 28. The final classification of the recrudescent patients after adjustment by genotyping is shown in Table 4. The treatment failure rate at day 28 by intention-to-treat analysis was also estimated to 25% (95% CI: 8–50) and after adjustment by genotyping to 19% (95% CI: 5–43). Mean fever clearance time was calculated as 1.2 ± 0.7 days and, parasite clearance time was calculated as 1.3 ± 0.9 days.

Table 4

Paired analysis of pvcsp, pvmsp3 and microsatellite markers sequences used for differentiating recrudescences from reinfections for the four patients with a reoccurrence of parasitemia (Tsiroanomandidy, Madagascar, 2006).

Allele sizes of microsatellites markers (bp)

Genotypes in

Patient

Day

6.34

L34

2.21

8.332

14.185

L40

pvcsp gene

pvmsp3 gene

Final classification

TDD062079

0

221/225

108

196

217

89/91

97

VK210

A

Recrudescence

1

221/225

108

196

217

91

97

VK210

A

14

225

108

196

217

91

97

VK210

A

TDD06viv12

0

219

108/110

196

222

na

97

VK210

na

Recrudescence

1

219

108/110

196

222

na

97

VK210

na

28

219

110

196

222

na

97

VK210

na

TDD06viv15

0

225

110

196

na

98

97

VK210

na

Reinfection or Relapse

1

230

104

205

na

93

97

VK210

na

21

225

108

196

na

91

97

VK210

na

TDD06viv20

0

230

108

198

na

91

97

VK210

A

Recrudescence

1

230

108

198

na

91

97

VK210

A

14

230

108

198

na

91

97

VK210

A

na: not available

Two infections (TDD062079 and TDD06viv12) were polyclonal as indicated by microsatellite markers analysis.

pvcsp sequences were classified as VK210 or VK247 types as described [17]; after DNA sequences alignment, no SNP was observed between day 0, 1 and the day of reoccurent parasitemia.

pvmsp3 sequences were classified into types A (1900 bp), B (1300 bp) or C (1100 bp) as described [40]; after DNA sequences alignment, one SNP was observed between TDD062079 at day 0 and the sequences obtained from both days 1 and 14. No differences were observed between TDD06viv20 sequences.

pvdhfr/pvdhps genotypes and clinical response to SP

No significant differences were observed between recrudescent and non-recrudescent patients in terms of sex ratio, mean temperature at day 0, mean age, initial mean parasitaemia, haemoglobin concentration and mean number of mutations in pvdhfr/pvdhps genes (Table 5).

One patient presenting a P. falciparum infection and the one presenting a P. vivax reinfection (or relapse, as indicated by genotyping analysis) were excluded from the non-recrudescent patients group.

The pvdhfr/pvdhps genotype and therapeutic response of each isolate evaluated are listed in Table 6. Three of the four patients carrying the pvdhfr/pvdhps triple-mutant genotype (58R/117N, 383G) displayed ACPRs. The remaining patient was classified treatment failure at day 28. Considering the pvdhfr double mutant 58R/117N genotype, all 3 patients displaying treatment failure and 6 over the 11 displaying ACPRs carried it, providing an odd ratio for TF of 8.27 with a wide 95% CI of 0.35–197.6. The molecular/therapeutic outcome relationship can't be clearly depicted from these data.

Table 6

The pvdhfr/pvdhps genotypes and therapeutic responses of 15 patients from Tsiroanomandidy (Madagascar, 2006) treated with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for P. vivax infections

Sequence polymorphism in

Patient

pvdhfr

Pvdhps

No. of mutations in the 2 genes

Therapeutic responseb

Trial no.

Age (Years)

33

58

117

383

VIV7

2

P

S

S

A

0

ACPR

60446

2.5

P

S

S

A

0

ACPR

VIV14

7

L

S

S

A

1

ACPR

VIV18

13

P

S

S

A

0

ACPR

60756

42

P

S

S

A

0

ACPR

VIV3

12

P

R

N

G

3

ACPR

VIV8

34

P

S

N

A

1

ACPR

VIV20

9

P

R

N

A

2

TF

62298

5

P

R

N

A

2

ACPR

60250

6

P

R

N

A

2

ACPR

60149

8

P

R

N

G

3

ACPR

VIV4

30

P

R

N

G

3

ACPR

VIV12

6

P

R

N

G

3

TF

62079

0.8

P

R

N

A

2

TF

VIV15

2

P

R

N

A

2

Reinfection or relapse

Discussion

This study highlights the real burden of P. vivax infections by updating prevalence data in eight sites throughout Madagascar. Despite the likely underestimation of the prevalence of P. vivax due to the use of the RDT for malaria screening [2], this study confirms, however, that P. vivax is the second prevalent species in malaria infections after P. falciparum. The highest prevalence of Plasmodium vivax infections were found in the western side of Madagascar, certainly because of the predominance of ethnic groups of Indo-Asian and Middle Eastern origin, who carry the Duffy antigen [26].

SP resistance and related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes were analysed in P. vivax samples from seven sites representative of the four major epidemiological strata for malaria. The two genes were screened by sequencing, to identify possible new mutations. The P. vivax pvdhfr gene is known to be highly diverse, supporting the use of such an approach [27]. A very high proportion of mutant-type isolates (72.2%) and diverse alleles were identified in these isolates, with 15 different mutant-type alleles observed if both pvdhfr and pvdhps gene mutations were taken into account. This is the first time that mutations at positions implicated in SP resistance have been described in P. vivax isolates from Madagascar.

Only two substitutions were identified in pvdhps, whereas six non-synonymous mutations, including four that have already been described, were found in pvdhfr. Mutations in these two genes do not play identical roles in the emergence of SP-resistance. Similar observations have been made for P. falciparum [28, 29]. Mutations seem occurring first in pfdhfr gene, then after in pfdhps gene when most of the parasites in the population have double- or triple-mutant alleles of the dhfr gene [22].

Mutations in pvdhfr, including 58R and 117N, have been implicated in pyrimethamine resistance. The 58R allele was found in 58% of all P. vivax isolates, in combination with 117N, which was found alone or in combination with other mutations in 63.5% of all isolates. Studies in vitro have shown that the mutation of a single base, leading to the replacement of a serine by an asparagine residue at codon 117, increases the IC50 value of pyrimethamine by more than 80 times. The combination of this mutation with the replacement of a serine by an arginine residue at codon 58 generates an enzyme more than 400 times more resistant to pyrimethamine than the wild-type enzyme [30, 31]. The 57L/58R/117N, triple mutant previously observed in Thailand [14] and associated with low levels of parasite clearance was not found. No parasites of the 57L/58R/61M/117T quadruple mutant type, associated with a high risk of SP treatment failure, were also not found.

Two new mutations were found at codons 21 and 130 in the pvdhfr gene. The mutation at codon 130 accounted for 31.4% of the isolates. This mutation, present mostly at Miandrivazo (67% of isolates), was strongly associated with the 58R/117N double mutant. The P33L substitution accounted for only 6% of the isolates. This mutation was previously found to be associated with isolates of Comorian or Malagasy origin [14, 25]. One of the unique features of the pvdhfr gene of P. vivax is the presence of a tandem repeat between amino-acid residues 70 and 110. Size polymorphism has been reported in this region [22, 32], but no variation was observed in this study.

It was impossible to assess the impact of the new N130K mutation based on clinical data, because only the 58R/117N double mutant was observed in isolates from the patients enrolled in the clinical trial of SP efficacy, including the isolate with the A383G mutation in pvdhps. The use of yeast constructs might facilitate interpretation of the role of this mutation in resistance [33].

Because of the absence of a genotyping consensus protocol for P. vivax to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection, the use of a combination of different genes such as pvama1, pvmsp1, pvmsp3 or microsatellite markers in paired analysis seems to be the safest available method. In this study, pvcsp and pvmsp3 genes sequencing and six different microsatellite markers were used on samples from day 0, day 1 and day of reoccurrence. The use of microsatellite markers seems to be useful as more polyclonal infections could be detected. Obvioulsy, the main limitation of this protocol was the well-recognized impossibility to prove that a P. vivax reoccurrence was a recrudescence, a relapse or a reinfection.

No significant association between pvdhfr/pvdhps polymorphisms and SP-treatment outcome was found, but all recrudescent patients were pvdhfr double-mutant carrier. This result strongly suggests that infection due to the pvdhfr 58R/117N double mutant is necessary but not sufficient for SP treatment failure to occur. The treatment outcome is likely to be favourable if the parasite has a wild-type genotype, but in parasites with mutations, outcome depends on the alleles present at the pvdhfr and pvdhps loci and the individual response of the patient [12]. Currently, it is well known that beside parasite factors, host factors such as nutritional status, immune response and rates of drug metabolism are involved in determining treatment outcome.

Surprisingly, almost 72.3% of the tested P. vivax isolates had mutations in the pvdhfr and/or pvdhps genes, despite SP never having been recommended as a first-line treatment for malaria, but only as a second-line treatment from 1998 to 2005. ACT is now recommended for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria regardless of the causal Plasmodium species. Nevertheless, self-treatment remains frequent in Madagascar since unpublished study has shown that three quarters of all febrile patients attending government health facilities have already used chloroquine in 67.6% of cases, cotrimoxazole (sulphamethoxazol/trimethoprim) in 23.4% and SP in 9.4% of cases. Cotrimoxazole is the drug most widely used to treat diarrhoea as well as respiratory infections [34]. Asymptomatic P. vivax infections and treatment with trimethoprim are probably common, resulting in the exposure of parasites to this drug. Mutations in the pvdhfr and pvdhps genes may reflect overall antifolate drug pressure in Madagascar.

Previous studies have shown that dhfr mutant P. falciparum isolates were extremely rare [35], with only one case of infection with the 108N mutant reported in the south of Madagascar. Based the observations for P. vivax isolates, data for P. falciparum genotypes should be updated.

Conclusion

SP has been recommended for intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy since 2005 in Madagascar. The regional office of the WHO for Africa currently recommends IPTp with SP in countries with a parasitological failure rate of less than 50% [36]. With a frequency of TF estimated at 19% and a prevalence of up to 17.5% of all malaria cases, P. vivax infections remains a public health problem in Madagascar and there is no doubt that SP will not be completely effective in IPTp strategy [37, 38]. The extensive use of SP will increase the drug selection pressure on the parasite and favour the spread of resistance. As a result, this study highlights (i) that genotyping in the pvdhfr gene remains a useful tool to monitor the emergence and the spread of P. vivax SP-resistant in order to improve the national antimalarial drug policy, (ii) the issue of using SP as a monotherapy for IPT of pregnant women or children.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and healthcare workers involved in the national network for the surveillance of malaria resistance in Madagascar (Réseau d'Etude de la Résistance, RER) from which these samples were obtained, and the staff of the Ministry of Health of Madagascar for their collaboration. We thank Hanitra Ranaivosoa, Didier Ralaizandry, Daimondra Raveloariseheno and Vony Rabekotorina for helping with field work.

This work was supported by grant from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, FSP/RAI 2001-168 project. Sample collection was funded by the Global Fund project for Madagascar round 3 (Community Action to Roll Back Malaria, Grant number: MDG-304-G05-M).

Authors' original submitted files for images

Authors' contributions

CBa performed laboratory work and wrote the manuscript. MT and CBo carried out sequencing and gave constructive advice. AR, LR and RR performed the field work. MJ performed laboratory work. SP helped with the writing of the manuscript and gave constructive advice. DM was involved in all stages of this study.

Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.