Vocational Teacher Preparation: The United States

Abstract

The first federal legislative and financial involvement in the development of formal vocational education programs in the United States, the Smith-Hughes Act of 1917, required teacher preparation in vocational education. Historically, there have been two pathways to vocational teacher certification/licensure. The first is focused on a traditional teacher preparation model, using colleges and universities with degree programs consisting of general education, technical content, and teacher pedagogy, including student teaching. An alternative pathway has relied on work experience in the discipline in which certification/licensure is sought, supplemented by a teacher education program at a university. These differing pathways have existed for over 100 years. Vocational education in the United States has suffered from negative perceptions of quality and effectiveness, and vocational teachers have also been subject to concerns regarding their teaching abilities. The alternative preparation route has had widely diverse requirements and pedagogical preparation from state to state, due to the decentralized US educational system. As a result, vocational teacher preparation is not standardized across the United States. In addition, vocational schools using the alternative route to employ teachers have faced challenges in recruiting and retaining teachers from private industry. Another current challenge facing vocational teacher preparation in the United States is the reduction in financial support for vocational education programs, despite the need for skilled labor throughout the country. This has led to a corresponding reduced number of colleges and universities providing vocational teacher preparation programs. At a time when high-quality vocational teachers are needed, these and other concerns and challenges face the field.

Cramer K (1994) The vocational teacher pipeline: how academically well-prepared is the next generation of vocational teachers? U.S. Department of Education, Policy and Program Studies Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Gray KC, Walter RA (2001) Reforming career and technical education licensure and preparation: a public policy synthesis. The Ohio State University, National Dissemination Center for Career and Technical Education, ColumbusGoogle Scholar

Lewis M (1926) The status of trade & industrial teacher training in the United States in the year 1926. Am Vocat News Bull 1:22–33Google Scholar

Lynch R (1991) A national database on vocational teacher education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED329733. University of California, Berkeley, National Center for Research in Vocational Education, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar

Ruhland S, Bremer C (2002) Alternative teacher certification procedures and professional development opportunities for career and technical education teachers. National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, St. PaulGoogle Scholar

Zirkle C (2015) Requirements as a qualified vocational teacher and principal in the U.S. Paper presented at the Conference to Broaden Teacher’s International Vision, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar

Zirkle C (2016) A qualitative analysis of high school level vocational education in the United States: three decades of positive change. In: Pilz M (ed) Youth in transition: vocational education and training in times of economic crisis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Zirkle C, Martin L (2012) Challenges and opportunities for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in the United States. In: Pilz M (ed) The future of vocational education and training in a changing world. Springer, New York, pp 9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zirkle C, Martin L, McCaslin NL (2007) Study of state certification/licensure requirements for secondary career and technical education teachers. University of Minnesota, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, St. PaulGoogle Scholar