Comcast spreads cash wide on Capitol Hill

Comcast money has flowed to all but three members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. | AP Photo

Fifteen of the 18 lawmakers who sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will hold its hearing on March 26, have taken home some form of a Comcast check. Sens. Durbin (D-Ill.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) all are running for reelection this year — and each has Comcast cash to show for it.

So do Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), as well as the leaders of the Senate’s top antitrust panel, Klobuchar and Lee. Each of those members received Comcast donations this election cycle to their leadership PACs, which allow lawmakers to contribute to their party allies and, in the process, raise their personal profiles and amass congressional influence.

Text Size

-

+

reset

Those members, as well as the others mentioned in this story, had no comment.

Schumer, though, secured a commitment from Comcast on the very day of its merger announcement that it would not kill Time Warner Cable jobs in New York. After it was later revealed Schumer’s brother helped orchestrate the deal, the senator pledged he’d recuse himself from the matter.

On the opposite side of the Capitol, the House Judiciary Committee is readying another hearing on Comcast — and many of its members also are familiar with the company’s financial support. Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), for example, has received $15,000 this cycle from Comcast, some for his leadership PAC and the rest for his personal campaign.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee and its Senate counterpart so far haven’t scheduled their own reviews of the new Comcast-Time Warner Cable deal. But both panels do regulate Comcast by way of their broad jurisdiction over Internet, cable and telephone issues, and they have been canvassed almost entirely by Comcast contributions. The company has given to 50 of 54 of the House committee’s Democrats and Republicans, donating either to their reelection campaigns or their leadership PACs, according to a POLITICO analysis of campaign finance data from Jan. 1, 2013 to Jan. 31, 2014. And Comcast has donated in some way to 20 of 24 lawmakers on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.

There has been a total of $12,500 in checks for Walden, the leader of the telecom subcommittee, to both his personal coffers and leadership PAC. Comcast also has given $2,500 to Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), a contender to lead Democrats on the full Energy and Commerce panel following the retirement this year of California Rep. Henry Waxman — another recipient of Comcast support.

The company says its donation footprint reflects the fact that many members of Congress represent states or districts where Comcast does business. For example, roughly two-thirds of the Energy and Commerce Committee represent localities where Comcast operates, the company said. It’s a similar story on the House Judiciary panel, where Comcast also lobbies on copyright and other issues.

Regardless, opponents are bracing for a fight. “If all the push is coming from one side, then that side is probably going to knock the center in the direction it prefers,” said Albert Foer, the president of the American Antitrust Institute, which opposes the deal because it’s “not in the public interest.” He said the question remains, then, whether opponents can “mobilize forces that can help offset the financial benefits that politicians may be getting from Comcast.”

Of course, Comcast’s donations came months before it announced its plan to buy Time Warner Cable — but that’s the point. It’s “proactive giving,” said Miller, “so that when a corporation needs access in a time of trouble, investigation or oversight, they have already built the quote-unquote relationships they need to soften or make their arguments to a sympathetic audience.”