Dozens of Mich. Schools Under Suspicion For Cheating

An announcement by state officials that as many as 71 Michigan
elementary and middle schools might have cheated on state tests last
winter has burgeoned into competing scandals.

Some observers were struck by the scope of the trouble, noting that
the number of schools cited for test-result "irregularities" in
Michigan is more than double the number of New York City schools
accused of cheating in a widely publicized 1999 investigation.

On the other hand, many local educators said the real scandal lies
in how state officials handled the evidence of possible cheating. They
angrily criticized the officials for releasing information on June 7
that implicated 21 districts without first hearing explanations.

The outcry prompted legislative leaders to call a joint meeting of
the education committees last week. The committees, in turn, summoned
state Treasurer Douglas B. Roberts, who oversees the test, for
questioning. Even Gov. John Engler expressed dismay that an apparent
news leak at the Michigan Department of the Treasury had truncated the
state's usual process for dealing with suspected testing
irregularities. Still, no one was ready last week to dismiss the
evidence of possible cheating, least of all state officials.

The problems were found in the written answers students composed to
questions on social science, science, and writing tests. Numerous
answers did not seem like independent work because they matched too
closely, officials said. It was unclear whether the cause of the
similarities was teacher help, communication among students, or
something else, they noted.

In some cases, clusters of students from the same class appeared to
have handed in answers that were virtually identical.

"It's the first time we've had something of this magnitude," said
Bridget Medina, a spokeswoman for the state treasury department, which
administers the tests through its merit-awards office. At the same
time, she said, "we recognize there may be an explanation for some of
these similar answers."

The state has given districts until the end of the week to respond
to the evidence.

Local and state investigations could mean that scores for the sets
of papers deemed to reflect cheating fall to zero, thereby lowering
overall scores for the schools and their districts.

In Michigan, as in other states, such tests are growing in
prominence, are widely publicized, and in some cases carry significant
consequences for students and schools. For example, high scores on one
of the tests involved in the investigation, 8th grade science, can earn
a middle schooler $500 toward college.

No deadline has yet been set for the state to decide which schools
will be penalized, Ms. Medina said.

Superintendents Protest

Of the 70 elementary and middle schools under suspicion for
cheating—the total dipped last week because officials discovered
that one school had been included by mistake—44 are in Detroit,
Michigan's largest district, and the others are scattered throughout
the state.

The Michigan Educational Assessment Program, or MEAP, tests in five
subjects were given to 4th, 5th, 7th, and 8th graders in January and
February. The questionable answers surfaced mostly in the 5th and 8th
grade social studies tests, with a smaller number in 5th and 8th grade
science and 5th grade writing.

Test graders hired by a North Carolina contractor flagged answers
with close similarities. Those answers went first to the state's
testing experts for review and then were examined by a nine-member
panel of outside educators.

Treasury officials had intended to allow the districts with
suspicious answers to review them and respond before making the list
public. Instead, they alerted superintendents to the problems before a
hastily called press conference on June 7, after learning that a radio
news report about the suspected cheating was airing that day.

"As it was, it was a choice between them reading about it in the
newspaper or getting a call from us," said Ms. Medina. "It's
unfortunate, but I don't think it should overshadow the focus on the
test irregularities."

But superintendents called the change in plan more than
unfortunate.

"Talk about unethical procedures," said Alan M. Dobrovolec, the
superintendent of the 11,000-student Taylor district in suburban
Detroit, whose J. Edgar Hoover Junior High School was on the list for
its 8th grade social studies test results. "It took us about an hour to
figure out what the problem was," the superintendent said. "But the
fallout is our reputation has been damaged, whether we are guilty or
not."

He explained that the test question at issue in his district asked
for a definition of NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The
school's three 8th grade social studies teachers had guessed that the
test would include a question on NATO, and using approved MEAP coaching
materials, taught the children a definition that included the phrases
"alliance of country" and "prevent the spread of communism." It was
those phrases that were flagged by the test graders.

"It's not a case of cheating," Mr. Dobrovolec argued. "It's a case
of teaching and learning."

Preparing Too Well?

Similar stories about lessons well learned were repeated last week
in Michigan newspapers, as a half-dozen superintendents around the
state responded to what they viewed as unfounded accusations.

A spokesman for the 163,000-student Detroit district, Stan
Childress, said late last week that the district's investigation was
still going on, but that some Detroit schools may have also worked too
well with preparation materials.

"Our curriculum experts believe many of these problems are going to
be explainable by many of the patterned-response strategies in
materials provided by the state," he said.

Daniel M. Koretz, a testing expert with the RAND Corp., a Santa
Monica, Calif.-based research organization, called the problems in
Michigan "surprising only in scope," and said the controversy could
point to a problem that goes beyond cheating in the strict sense.

In preparing students for tests, he said, "there's this whole range
of shortcuts that people take that are not frankly cheating, but they
are not what we want to see people doing in response to
accountability."

Vol. 20, Issue 41, Pages 18, 30

Published in Print: June 20, 2001, as Dozens of Mich. Schools Under Suspicion For Cheating

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.