Other Resources

John of god

João
Teixeira de Faria, aka "João de deus" or "John
of god," has been one of the more popular faith healers
in Brazil since about 1970. Teixeira de Faria claims that he
channels more than thirty "doctor entities" (including
Dr. Fritz). He is big business for tour operators around the world,
including Emma Bragdon,
who has a Ph.D. in Transpersonal Psychology.
Bob & Diana of
Watsonville, California, can also be your
guides. If you are coming from England, contact
Rupert Drew. However,
a website in New Zealand warned:

A recent [2014] TV documentary (60 minutes) portrayed him in a very negative
light, although showing video of him scraping a persons eyeball with a
scalpel, and putting scissors up a person's nose, they said these were easy
tricks to perform....Yet, others have reported to me seeing his healings
first-hand. I suggest you verify his authenticity before departing, as a
trip to Brazil can be quite expensive!

[new] Michael Usher of Australia's "60 Minutes" is not so hesitant in his distrust of this fake healer:

An Australian physician also rejects the irrational pilgrimages people make in desperation:

[/new] Robert and Caterina Pellegrino-Estrich
claim they were the first
non-Brazilians to reveal to the world John of god's amazing healing
gifts. They are practicing "Bio-Energy Spiritual
Healers" and Reiki Masters,
Prana Therapists, and Spiritual Healing Practitioners. Caterina calls
herself "The Lady of
Light." They provide "ground support" for visitors to Abadiania, where
John plies his trade. They advise, however, that before you travel to Brazil
you purchase travel insurance.
"Travel insurance is essential to cover you in the event of accident,
illness, loss of personal belongings or death." Nice touch. I guess John's healing powers don't extend to cover travelers bringing him gifts in exchange for false hope.

As far as I know there has been only one
medical study of John of god's healing powers and it concluded: "The
surgical procedures are real but we couldn't evaluate the efficacy. It
didn't appear to have any specific effect. Our findings are undoubtedly more
of an exploratory kind than conclusive ones. Further studies are clearly
necessary to cast light on this unorthodox treatment." I don't think so. We already know how fake healing works.

I have received a letter from a man who swears that John removed a cyst
(why not?) and who had epilepsy relieved, which, he says, was caused by
having had a brain tumor removed a year earlier (in a hospital in America).
"After Brazil," he writes, "my EEG was perfectly normal again. (Though I
admit I am still having some sensitivity to exercise or stress)." My
correspondent wonders how so many intelligent and important people
(including Shirley Maclaine!) could
believe in John of god's powers if they were not real. The answer is that
they can believe because they are desperate and have faith,
and they
are not too demanding of what they consider to be evidence for deception vs.
true healing. (Believers are fond of Loyola's statement of faith: For
those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who disbelieve, no
amount of proof is sufficient.) No argument I make, or any evidence produced by someone who
might actually do a follow-up on about a hundred of John's patients selected
randomly, is likely to alter that faith. Nevertheless, such a study should
be done, just for the record.

On February 12, 2005, ABC News Primetime devoted an hour to John of god.
Bob Park had this to say about
the show:

IS "JOHN OF GOD" A HEALER OR A CHARLATAN? IS ABC NEWS
NUTS? In an hour long report last night,
Primetime Live co-anchor John Quinones traveled to a remote area of
Brazil to find out if "John of god" is really a miracle healer as his
followers claim. Wake up ABC! It's the 21st Century. In a position to help
millions of viewers understand that they live in a rational universe, ABC
has chosen instead to tell them that their sad superstitions are open
scientific questions. To give the program credibility they turned to "one
of the world's most respected surgeons,
Dr.
Mehmet Oz." Oz is no doubt a fine surgeon, but he has touch therapists
in his operating room helping patients "connect to the healing energy
everywhere."

Randi was given 19 seconds to comment on John of god's
trickery. (Randi spent more than an hour in New York being interviewed and
taped for his 19 seconds on screen.) Another 30 seconds was
spent noting that John of god has been accused of molesting one of his young
patients and has been arrested several times for practicing medicine without
a license. John is a farmer by training and has a large ranch outside of the
town where he has his clinic. But most of the program focused on the people
flocking to this clinic in the middle of nowhere (Abadiania) seeking a
miracle. I guess "fair and balanced" journalism for topics like faith
healing means following a few people around to see if the healing really
works on them. Contrast that with a few skeptical comments and some
accusations. And bring in an open-minded physician to say that John is
either a healer or he's deluded.

Dr. Oz made one comment, however, that should have received
more attention. Even if John of god is a charlatan or deluded, some of his
patients think they've been healed, cured, or helped by him, and it would be
worthwhile to study those people to see if their faith, their drive to be
healed, and the like are of any scientific importance. Other than that, the
show was not only without merit, it was meretricious. ABC did nothing to
discredit the notion that John is invaded by spirit doctors or can cure
diseases like breast cancer by sticking a forceps up a person's nose (a
carnival trick) or allergies by making a slight incision about the
breast or numerous other ailments by scraping the eyeball (another
trick).

The final tally for the show was 1. a man's brain tumor was
smaller after he visited John of god (natural but unexplained regression and
an amazing coincidence? treatment before he came to John finally showed some
results? one of John's channeled spirits did invisible surgery? the
patient's will to live and be healed affected the tumor's growth? or ?); 2.
a lady complaining of chronic fatigue says she feels a lot better after John
slit her above one of her breasts (psychosomatic? John's spirits cut just
the right place to relieve her symptoms?
placebo effect?); 3. a man
with ALS shows no effect
(didn't have enough faith? just what you'd expect?); 4. a young actress from
South Africa with breast cancer shows no effect (same as 3); 5. a woman
paralyzed from the waist down is able to walk using rails to hold on to, but
she clearly has no use of her legs; she says she feels something is
improving, though (placebo effect? delusion? didn't have enough faith? in
any case, we don't know if she tried to walk with rails before seeing John
and, if so, what the results were), and 6. the journalist's shoulder didn't
heal in 40 days as John promised but Quinones admits he didn't follow John's
advice not to have sex or eat pepper.

Number 6 may be the most telling of all as to ABC's
seriousness in doing this program. If Quinones wasn't going to follow John's
instructions, why was this material included in the program? Did he think it
was a joke?

So, what was learned? Not much, except that millions of
desperate people will try anything and believe anything to preserve or
restore their lives to a healthy state. I think we already knew that,
though. Oz speculated that when John sticks a metal object deep up a
patient's nostril and twists it around several times, he may be contacting
the pineal gland, which may trigger some sort of response in the brain that
aids healing. I seriously doubt anyone is going to do a study on this
speculation, but I also would have doubted any physician would ever stick an
ice pick through a human being's eye socket to destroy part of the frontal
lobe. What do I know?

and clearly stated to the camera during the videotaping
session [that it] is an old carny effect that my friend
Todd Robbins tells
me traces back to the jaduwallahs of India and was adopted from their
repertoire by an American performer named
Melvin Burkhardt,
first being done on this continent in 1926. It's now known as the
"Blockhead Trick," and is usually done with a heavy 4 1/2" (30d —
thirty-penny) iron nail tapped up the nose and into the back of the
throat, a clear, straight, path that seems improbable. It's performed
today by easily more than 100 performers in carnivals and sideshows around
the world, and John of god simply uses it to impress his victims, though
he has a far easier time of it by using smooth nickel-plated (or
stainless-steel) forceps.

I know that nobody is likely to do any follow-ups on the
desperate patients who seek a miracle from John. I know that there will be
plenty of people willing to provide
testimonials to their own
and other miraculous cures. I know John doesn't keep records, but even if he
did, he and his staff are not interested in scientific documentation. I know
John doesn't charge a fee for his "services," but he prescribes herbs to
everybody he sees (about 1,500-2,000 people a week) and his clinic sells the
herbs. According to
Quinones, "the clinic does pull in something like $400,000 a year from
the sale of herbs." I know from watching the video of John at work that he
places his hands on the breasts of his female patients regardless of what
ails them.

I know the lab that did the tests on the young man with the
brain tumor is not going to suggest that maybe they made an error in doing
or reading their MRI and the doctors are not likely to suggest that they may
have made the wrong diagnosis. I predicted while watching the show that the
lady with chronic fatigue and "allergies" was going to testify she improved.
She did. How long will her elevated feeling last? Who knows. I wonder if ABC
will do a follow-up on her. It wouldn't surprise me if the good feeling
decreased over time and rather than admit that John has no healing powers,
she'll go back for another dose.

Trailing the man with ALS and the woman whose spinal cord
was crushed was unnecessarily cruel. There is no way that the placebo effect
is going to cure ALS or allow a woman to walk after 17 years in a
wheelchair. I don't care how much
faith they have, no cheery
thoughts or deep hope can change these kinds of conditions. To follow them
with cameras was to imply that maybe there's a chance this will work. Right.
And pigs might fly if you pray over them long enough.

The actress/dancer from South Africa reminded me of
Pat Davis, a local
TV newswoman who chose Gerson therapy over chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Both women's mothers also had breast cancer. Davis's mother survived and
outlived her daughter. The dancer's mother died even with chemotherapy. Even
after her doctor in South Africa gave her the news that her cancer was still
active, she again refused conventional treatment and is opting for some
unspecified "alternative"...and another trip to John of god's clinic in
Brazil.

Why didn't ABC ask What are the odds that a farmer in a
remote area of Brazil who has no medical training and who sticks metal deep
into people's nostrils, causing them to bleed even if relatively painlessly,
who slits with a knife areas on the body that have no known physiological
relationship to what ails the patient and then sticks his finger in the open
wound, who claims that god does the work even though he has about 35 dead
doctors and healers to assist him by doing invisible surgery from the spirit
world, and so on....what are the odds that this guy is performing miracles?
The real story is how is it possible for millions of intelligent people
to believe in such nonsense? However, had ABC told that story, who would
have watched?

We're in the 21st century but many of our people are
possessed by superstitions that are thousands of years old. Resistance to
rationality seems to be getting stronger rather than weaker even as our
knowledge of the universe keeps expanding.

One would think that a 21st century news organization like
ABC would not want to promote and encourage superstition, especially when
the results could be lethal. Are the producers at ABC news just naive? Don't
they realize the harm they can do by encouraging people to believe in faith
healing? Did they really believe that such an unbalanced program could be in
the interest of anything except catering to the desperate, the faith-based,
and the increasingly superstitious beliefs about health care that the Dr.
Ozs of the world promote?

update:
17 Nov 2010. More than
five years after John Quinones did his piece on João
Teixeira de Faria, Oprah sent Susan Casey (editor of Oprah's magazine, O,
and an even less curious journalist than Quinones) to "investigate." The
result is more of the same: no real investigation into the deceit, but every
effort to find a "miracle" and a doctor (Dr. Jeff Rediger) to validate
it all.

David Gorski didn't take too
kindly to Oprah shilling for the faith healer. For more on Lisa Wellman (the woman who put her faith in John of god and died of treatable breast cancer) and Oprah's shilling for the fake healer watch the video below: