We can create and maintain an SPV implementation for Bitmark ready for it's release.

As we hope to achieve a natural adoption curve without any hype, adding it as an option to the webwallet would not be an immediate priority, however technically we would hope that you would be able to confirm all was in order and have any minor bugs ironed out ahead of time, so that it's ready and proven if and when required.

If we implement bitmarkj, and if it is not too much work on your side, would we be able to go through the integration steps required ahead of time to ensure all works as expected? If agreeable then out aim would be to have this ready within the next 2 weeks, and to have proven the integration shortly after, late July or early in August.

We are also considering forking multibit, is it fair to assume that there are no special requirements of hive which would not be covered by integrating multibit?

If we implement bitmarkj, and if it is not too much work on your side, would we be able to go through the integration steps required ahead of time to ensure all works as expected? If agreeable then out aim would be to have this ready within the next 2 weeks, and to have proven the integration shortly after, late July or early in August.

We are also considering forking multibit, is it fair to assume that there are no special requirements of hive which would not be covered by integrating multibit?

Coming back to this now that we have successfully launched on all platforms.

We will be looking to go through this process in the coming weeks, could you let me know whether we should be considering Hive support as an option for the future.