Friday, 29 January 2016

In Beatrice Prior's dystopian Chicago world, society is
divided into five factions, each dedicated to the cultivation of a particular
virtue--Candor (the honest), Abnegation (the selfless), Dauntless (the brave),
Amity (the peaceful), and Erudite (the intelligent). On an appointed day of
every year, all sixteen-year-olds must select the faction to which they will
devote the rest of their lives. For Beatrice, the decision is between staying
with her family and being who she really is--she can't have both. So she makes
a choice that surprises everyone, including herself.

During the highly competitive initiation that follows,
Beatrice renames herself Tris and struggles alongside her fellow initiates to
live out the choice they have made. Together they must undergo extreme physical
tests of endurance and intense psychological simulations, some with devastating
consequences. As initiation transforms them all, Tris must determine who her
friends really are--and where, exactly, a romance with a sometimes fascinating,
sometimes exasperating boy fits into the life she's chosen. But Tris also has a
secret, one she's kept hidden from everyone because she's been warned it can
mean death. And as she discovers unrest and growing conflict that threaten to
unravel her seemingly perfect society, Tris also learns that her secret might
help her save the ones she loves . . . or it might destroy her

This book was extremely popular among teenage readers when it first came out, and has successfully transcended the reader age groups - much like Twilight and The Hunger Games had.

What I liked about it

I made a point of avoiding finding out what the book was about before I read it. Now that I have I can say it turned out to be a pleasant surprise and an easy read. At no point did I want to skip pages. There is a good mix of characters who are well-rounded - and quite human. Beatrice for example, is quite flawed and at times it is hard not to be critical of her for the things she thinks, says and does. Then you remember she is a 16 year old living under extreme circumstances. She is also quite critical of herself and considers herself to be unworthy of Abnegation (her family's faction), which I feel are redeeming qualities.

I don't think it would be much of a spoiler to confirm that there is a love story woven into the plot. The author manages to convey the innocence of teenage first love without being sentimental. It is absent of fluff and the exchanges between Tris and Four are realistic. I think this aspect of the story in particular was executed really well.

I am not one who preaches 'show don't tell' when writing. Personally, I think there is a place for both show and tell - it's the context that matters. However, it is an argument made strongly and if you support that school of thought, you'll be pleased to know Veronica Roth gets full marks for all 'show' and no 'tell'.

Where I took issue with it

The premise of this alternate reality is unconvincing. The idea of a society grouped into brave people, smart people, humble people etc. makes no sense to me - unless we are talking about aliens. Surely all human beings are divergent (??).

I would not call Divergenttrue dystopia since, although bad stuff happens, the book fails to evoke the sense of dread and discomfort a dystopian novel should. It's just not disturbing enough and the above-mentioned weakness in the premise doesn't help.

I appreciate that guys have a sensitive side, but I had a problem with the way certain male characters were portrayed at times. Al in particular came across as a whimpering cry baby, and I was unconvinced that, in the harsh, competitive Dauntless environment where the stakes were so high, he would have gotten away it. The stronger characters would have targeted him for being so weak.

The novel vs the movie

I saw the movie version shortly after and I have to say, although it is even more sanitised (to make it watchable for an even younger audience), I enjoyed it. I was pleased that the script writers got rid of aspects of the plot that I felt didn't work in the book (an example is the scene with Tris and Christina when they retrieve the flag - which in the book was at odds with their relationship with each other). On the other hand, reading the book gives you a more in-depth understanding of the movie.

Divergent may not be my idea of proper Dystopia, but it is a good read and one I would recommend. Having said that, I have also read the second book, Insurgent, and it does not measure up to the same standard as the first. I struggled to finish it and so I didn't bother with the last one, Allegiant.

Friday, 22 January 2016

Publisher's synopsisSix days ago, astronaut
Mark Watney became one of the first people to walk on Mars. Now, he's
sure he'll be the first person to die there. After a dust storm nearly
kills him and forces his crew to evacuate while thinking him dead, Mark
finds himself stranded and completely alone with no way to even signal
Earth that he’s alive — and even if he could get word out, his supplies
would be gone long before a rescue could arrive. Chances are, though, he
won't have time to starve to death. The damaged machinery, unforgiving
environment or plain-old "human error" are much more likely to kill him
first. But Mark isn't ready to give up yet. Drawing on his ingenuity,
his engineering skills — and a relentless, dogged refusal to quit — he
steadfastly confronts one seemingly insurmountable obstacle after the
next. Will his resourcefulness be enough to overcome the impossible odds
against him?

Sooz Book Reviews Gold Seal of Approval

My Review

As you may have picked up from the publisher's synopsis, The Martian is a very compelling read. I found it an absolute joy. It is very much a character-driven novel. Most would have given up and accepted their pending doom but not Mark Watney.

“I’m a survivor! I’m gonna make it!” That song Survivor, by Destiny’s Child comes to mind when I thnk of this book. The way they convey determination and convition is how the character approaches his predicament. Mark is very much a survivor and this is primarily down to his inability to give up, but also his 'glass-half-full' approach to life. He is also resourceful, clever, and quick-witted - all characteristics that help keep him going against the odds. He matches the definition of a geek, but not a stereotypical one. He is a tough-guy (a macho type) and, as such, refuses to show signs of weakness. He uses his sense of humour as a coping mechanism.
Mark comes across as the inquisitive sort - the kind who continuously asks questions and seek answers. I imagine that this habit has turned him into a problem-solver (as coming up with solutions is naturally the next step - when finding answers to problems). It is no wonder he is a scientist. Be warned, the novel is packed with detail of how he puts scientific theory into practice. Much of it went over my head but I was never bored.

Mostly the chapters read as daily logs (digital diary entries) of what transpired that day and what are his plans for the following day. As a result, with each log there is increasing tension and anticipation as to whether he had a good day or a disastrous one. I enjoyed following his progress, although sections of it were nail-biting. With each triumph I rejoiced with him and with each disaster I worried for his safety.I loved this book and will definitely revisit it in the future.

Friday, 15 January 2016

Publisher's synopsisFrom SUNDAY TIMES
bestselling author Harlan Coben, a heart-pounding thriller about the
ties we have to our past ... and the lies that bind us together.

It's
a profile, like all the others on the online dating site. But as NYPD
Detective Kat Donovan focuses on the accompanying picture, she feels her
whole world explode, as emotions she's ignored for decades come
crashing down on her. Staring back at her is her ex-fiance Jeff, the man
who shattered her heart 18 years ago.

Kat feels a spark,
wondering if this might be the moment when past tragedies recede and a
new world opens up to her. But when she reaches out to the man in the
profile, her reawakened hope quickly darkens into suspicion and then
terror as an unspeakable conspiracy comes to light, in which monsters
prey upon the most vulnerable.

As Kat's hope for a second chance
with Jeff grows more and more elusive, she is consumed by an
investigation that challenges her feelings about everyone she ever loved
- her former fiance, her mother, and even her father, whose cruel
murder so long ago has never been fully explained. With lives on the
line, including her own, Kat must venture deeper into the darkness than
she ever has before, and discover if she has the strength to survive
what she finds there.

My Review
I would describe Missing You as a light and easy read. I am not sure if it is for die-hard crime fiction fans as the plot is rather weak and there is a strong romantic plot woven into it. Kat is working on 2 cases but I am not sure she should be working on either of them - as one is closed and the other is out of her jurisdiction. She has a personal interest in one and seems unable to disentangle herself from the other. I found myself wondering who is working on the cases she should be working on. (It's not her partner, since he spends his time helping her with said cases.) Although not the main protagonist, the real heroine of this novel was Dana. She came across as brave and smart, so the story was most intriguing when it focused on her. In this sense she over-shadowed Kat, who came across rather weak in comparison. I couldn't help but think that, had the roles been reversed, both cases would have been solved a lot quicker. Dana has true potential as a crime fighter, while Kat's competence was at times questionable.
The novel explores contemporary issues and I liked the premise. I can see where the inspiration comes from. Without giving too much away, it focuses on the internet and the darker side of it's use. I also liked how it explored people's attitudes to those with unconventional lifestyles.

I think Harlan Coben writes crime fiction aimed at readers who enjoy romantic novels, since romance tends to be at the core of his (or her) books - at least the ones I have read. I also noticed similarities in the way the plot unfolds for both Six Years and Missing You (like he is telling the same story but in a different way). Out of the two, I preferred this one.

Thursday, 7 January 2016

Publisher's SynopsisChristian Grey exercises
control in all things; his world is neat, disciplined, and utterly
empty—until the day that Anastasia Steele falls into his office, in a
tangle of shapely limbs and tumbling brown hair. He tries to forget her,
but instead is swept up in a storm of emotion he cannot comprehend and
cannot resist. Unlike any woman he has known before, shy, unworldly Ana
seems to see right through him—past the business prodigy and the
penthouse lifestyle to Christian’s cold, wounded heart.

Will
being with Ana dispel the horrors of his childhood that haunt Christian
every night? Or will his dark sexual desires, his compulsion to control,
and the self-loathing that fills his soul drive this girl away and
destroy the fragile hope she offers him?

My Review

Grey is a retelling of the Fifty Shades of Grey story told by Christian Grey. This has become a common phenomenon with romantic novels written in the first person and originally told by the female character when said books have sold extremely well. I am not entirely against this idea as I see it as an opportunity to show a different perspective and reveal details that would not have been previously clarified.

The problem with Grey (the main problem) is that it is FSoG regurgitated. EL James has failed to recognise that, although she has created both characters and therefore they exist in her head, they are supposed to be individuals with different thoughts and feelings. When two people communicate, they do not assimilate and interpret the information they exchange (the input) in exactly the same way, and so one would not expect the exact same thought processes, and the subsequent output, to be identical perspectives (unless maybe they are identical twins). Most of the story is pretty much cut and pasted from the original and what has been added, i.e, the running commentary going on in Christian's head, renders the book disastrous. For one thing he constantly talks to himself, addressing himself in the third person, and for another his penis has a personality of it's own and contributes by apparently 'concurring' with Christian on a regular basis (I kid you not).

The central plot of FSoG is basically a game of tug-of-war (Christian
pulling Ana towards the dark side, Ana pulling Christian towards the
light). I did not hate it but I could not understand the appeal of Christian Grey. I found nothing about him alluring or sexy, but I did find him disturbing and creepy. Now
that I have read Grey and I have been in Christian's head, I would add (to creepy and disturbing) that he is odious and misogynistic. He is both inwardly and openly hostile to most women and (oddly) he complains bitterly about them showing signs of finding him attractive (apparently all women do). This revulsion by a heterosexual alpha-male is unrealistic and is an example of poor characterisation on the part of the author.

This
character was inspired by Edward Cullen of Twilight. Edward Cullen is a
vampire - which is disturbing and creepy, but he is not. Neither is he
sexist, nor a misogynist. Vampires see humans at worst as food and at
best as pets. Edward has rejected his true nature and is trying, as far as possible, to be like a human - but he is not human. He comes across as
a dominant alpha male who treats Bella like his submissive because of
WHAT he is (it's a vampire trait). It is one of his flaws.

Love it or hate it, with Twilight Stephanie Meyer was able to create a
contemporary version of a classic gothic anti-hero (a perceived villain
who is dark/shady, but also alluring). While Christian Grey is an
anti-hero, he bears no resemblance to the type in a gothic romance.
Unfortunately, EL James failed in her attempt
mainly because the masochistic analogy has been poorly executed.

Here is an example of the difference between Edward and Christian. In Twilight, Bella observes that attractive girls often flirt with Edward and he is unresponsive every time. He is never impolite or hostile towards them, rather he is oblivious to their advances. The problem with Christian is that he is unsympathetic with zero redeeming qualities (which sets him poles apart from a romantic gothic anti-hero), and without Ana's rose-tinted glasses he is horribly exposed.

Room for improvement? To improve Grey, it would need to be re-written from the beginning, by a ghost-writer. Failing that, deleting the words 'baby' and 'laters, baby' every time they appear in the text would at least reduce the cringe-factor considerably.

As it stands, the writing is such that it reads like a parody of itself. Here are some examples:1. Ana & Christian's first date in a cafe. I watch her dunk her tea bag in the pot. It is an elaborate and messy spectacle. She fishes it out almost immediately and places the used tea bag on her saucer. My mouth twitches with amusement as she tells me she likes her tea weak and black. For a moment, I think she is describing what she likes in a man. Get a grip, Grey. She's talking about tea.

2. Christian's driver/minion on receiving a set of instructions from him."Will you be needing Charlie Tango?"
(Apparently, Christian loves his helicopter so much he named it - and his minions are expected to refer to it by name)

3. Christian being a gentleman...I grab her hair and hold it out of the way as she continues to throw up everything she has had this evening. It is with some annoyance that I note that she doesn't appear to have eaten. (In other words, he exams the contents of her vomit!) ...I lead her away from the curious onlookers toward one of the flower beds. "If you are going to throw up again do it here. I'll hold you." It's darker here. She can puke in peace.

Since the only way to portray Christian in a positive
light is through Ana's rose-tinted glasses, it raises the question:
what were they thinking? Answer: Huge cash revenues. FSoG is a successful business venture, resulting from an incredibly successful marketing campaign that began the minute E.L. James and her original publisher signed over the movie and publication rights several years ago.

As there is nothing new to learn, Grey is mostly a boring read but the writing is so bad that parts of it are entertaining.

Publisher's synopsisQuentin Jacobsen has
spent a lifetime loving the magnificently adventurous Margo Roth
Spiegelman from afar. So when she cracks open a window and climbs back
into his life—dressed like a ninja and summoning him for an ingenious
campaign of revenge—he follows.

After their all-nighter ends and a
new day breaks, Q arrives at school to discover that Margo, always an
enigma, has now become a mystery. But Q soon learns that there are
clues—and they’re for him. Urged down a disconnected path, the closer he
gets, the less Q sees of the girl he thought he knew.

My Review

Caution: This review contains potential spoilers.

Paper Towns is the second novel by John Green that I have read - the first being 'Looking for Alaska'. I have not yet read the more well-known 'The Fault in Our Stars' but the success of that book and the subsequent movie led to the making of the movie and the 2015 published edition of Paper Towns (see cover).

John Green is a magnificent writer and I really loved this book. I found the inspiration behind the book to be an interesting one. Paper Towns are exactly that: non-existent towns that have been added to maps in order to identify copyright infringement. Like an artist's initials on a painting, it is how cartogrphers know if their work has been reproduced by someone else. The story is a coming-of-age one. Quentin is in his senior year at high school and there are only a few weeks left until graduation. It is a time when teenagers are concerned with finals, prom and graduation. Unlike his friends, Ben and Radar, Q is not so concerned about any of the above. His raison d'etre is to love (and preferably to be loved by) Margot Roth Spiegelman. What I loved about it.Margot lives in the house
opposite Q's and they have known each other since they were toddlers.
They were best friends as small children but drifted apart at the age of
9. This is revealed in the prologue and there is a line that reveals a lot about Q, about Margot, about their relationship and why they drifted apart. "I took two steps backward. ...As I took those two steps back, Margot took two equally small steps forward." Chapter 1, the first line - 'The longest day of my life began tardily', is the kind that is so memorable and telling that I can see myself quoting it for years to come. It told me that Q was about to share an adventure with me. It is the sort of line that instantly sparks one's interest and raises hope of a good read. This would have been a problem if it did not live up to expectation - but it did. There is a passage on the final page that I found equally 'attention-grabbing'.

What I got from the novel was a story about first love and this is addressed from two angles.

Being in love with an idea of a person, rather than the actual person. Q has become a mere acquaintance with Margot and he hardly knows her, so he has had to settle with loving his 'idea' of who she is.

The unfortunate state of being
in love without actually realising it, due to youth,
inexperience and not being the sort of person who is remotely interested
in the concept. I see this as Margot's predicament. (I have compared her to Lucia Honeychurch in A Room with a View.)

I was interested in the misinterpretation and miscommunication that occurs between the two characters because of their (above-mentioned) predicaments. For example, the way Q saw the clues Margot left behind as an invitation and a quest (when the intention was not for them to be either).

What I took issue withTo avoid repetition see paragraph 2, below.

The book vs the movieI did not enjoy the movie. Unfortunately, the story has been stripped of its vital organs, starting with the heart, and picked apart until only the skeleton is left. Those vital parts have then been replaced with artificial substitutes, aimed a simplifying the plot and ensuring a Hollywood-type ending. It was not all bad though, as the movie did give Angela (Radar's girlfriend} a personality and a prominent role. There are a few scenes added with just the two of them, which removed their token-like status in the book. Also, the way the relationship between Ben and Lacey plays out in the movie is more realistic than in the book. Finally, although Radar's parents' unique hobby provides comedy value in the book, it was also believable in the movie because a feasible explanation for it is provided .