Theses on capitalism and class struggle in Bangladesh

Joint Theses of the International Secretariat of the Revolutionary Communist International Tendency
(RCIT) and the Revolutionary Workers Organization (RCIT Section in Pakistan), November 2013,www.thecommunists.net

While the tables can be viewed in the text version of the document, the graphs can not for technical reasons. They can
however be viewed in the pdf version of this document which is attached below.

1. Bangladesh has a population of 152.4 million people (2012). Other sources speak of 161.1 million
people. It is the 8th most populous country in the world. Its capital city, Dhaka, ranks as the 9th largest city in the world with 14.6 Million people. 31.6% of its population lives in
cities (2011). (1) Nearly all (98%) people in Bangladesh belong to the Bengali nation. The rest are from tribal ethnic groups. About 89% of Bangladeshis are Muslims, followed by Hindus (8%),
Buddhists (1%) and Christians (0.5%).

Poor Capitalist Semi-Colony with an important Textile Industry

2. Bangladesh is a poor capitalist semi-colony. 43.3% of the population has to live on less than $1.25 a
day. (2) It has a GDP per capita of only PPP $ 1,568 (3) and is ranked by the IMF as only Number 154 amongst 187 countries around the world. The proportion of urban population living in slum area
is nearly two third (61.6%). (4) 43.2% of its adult population is illiterate. (5)

3. It is, however, a highly unevenly developed country. On one hand the country is not only very poor
but has also a high proportion of poor peasants. Out of a total Labor Force of 73.9 Millions, 31.97 Millions (=43.3%) are employed in agriculture. (6) 70% of the peasants are landless. Its share
of industry in national output is below other countries in South Asia. (See Graph 1). At the same time it has a growing and important manufacturing industry. Its share of manufacturing value
added in GDP was 17.3% in 2009. (7) It is the largest manufacturer among the so-called “least developed countries” with a share of world manufacturing exports of 0.11% (2009) which is similar to
Bulgaria or Columbia. 91.76% of Bangladesh’s exports are manufactures (2009), (8) of which textiles, clothing, and ready-made garments account for about three fourths of the country’s total
exports. (9) Bangladesh is – second only to China – the world's second-largest apparel exporter of western brands.

4. Bangladesh is a capitalist semi-colony which is highly exploited by the imperialist monopolies.
Foreign Direct Investment has grown to over $7 billion in 2012 (See Table 1). Given the low level of wages, imperialist monopolies can squeeze a rate of return of 22% from Bangladeshi workers.
This is one of the highest profit rates in the world for foreign corporations! (See Graph 2)

5. However one of the main forms of imperialist super-exploitation – the value transfer via unequal
exchange – is particularly relevant for Bangladesh. (10) Formally, most of the textile production is controlled by local capitalist (only 5% of textile factories are owned by foreign investors).
However nearly all of the produced value is appropriated by the imperialist monopolies. Less than 2% of the total value of shirts produced in Bangladesh are received by the direct producers as
wages. The profit by local companies is equivalent to about 1% of total value. The rest goes into the pockets of the imperialist capitalists. (11)

6. As nearly all semi-colonial countries in the world, Bangladesh has substantial debts to the
imperialist financial institutions. Its external debt stocks are 27 Billion US-Dollar (2011) which is the equivalent of 22.6% of its Gross National Income. As a result 5.5% of its annual income
from exports goes as debt service into the pockets of the imperialist banks and financial institutions. (12)

7. Bangladesh is the number one country in the world with the highest risk of the effects of the
dramatic climate crisis which is caused by the imperialist states and their monopolies. Their plunder and destruction of the environment is responsible for the climate crisis which increasingly
endangers the future of humankind. Bangladesh is particularly at risk of the consequences of warmer and rising sea levels and which inevitably leads to disastrous floods. Such floods have already
happened in the past years in increasing frequency. Bangladesh is at risk of losing significant parts of its population and land in the next decades as a result of the rising sea level. This
means nothing less than millions of Bangladeshi workers and peasants are threatened with extinction as a result of the capitalist climate crisis!

Brief Overview of the Working Class

8. The Bangladeshi working class is large and growing and at the same time highly super-exploited. About
87% of the labor force is employed in the informal sector (2010). Amongst female workers even 92.3% are employed in the informal sector. About 20% are day laborers, 41% are self-employed without
employees and 22% working as unpaid family workers. The informal sector contributes with a low 40% to GDP compared to its employment. The majority of formal jobs are in semi- to high skilled
professions, whereas informal jobs are concentrated among the 62% of jobs with low skills and low productivity. (13) (See also Table 2) Only 20% of the total work force are covered by the Labour
Law.

9. Unsurprisingly imperialist institutions like the World Bank praise Bangladesh as a paradise for
monopolies. According to a recent World Bank report on Bangladesh the country “has the potential to capture at least 15 million jobs in the next ten years. Recent reports (e.g.,
McKinsey/USAID) have shown that the productivity of Bangladeshi workers is on par with Chinese workers in well-managed firms with their wages being five times lower than those of their Chinese
counterparts (half those in Vietnam). Bangladesh’s unique competitive position comes at a time when China is in the process of outsourcing 80 million jobs from labor-intensive industries.”
(14) (For a comparison of the minimum wages in Asian countries see Graph 3.)

10. The
Bangladeshi working class and semi-proletarian layers are mostly working in small enterprises or are self-employed. 88% of those employed in the informal sector work in the enterprises with less
than 10 persons (See for more details Table 3 and 4).

11. Women
Workers are an important part of the Bangladeshi working class and the oppressed classes. There are about 12.5 million female workers which are 24.54% of the total labor force. (15)

12. Given the
extreme poverty many Bangladeshi leave the country to work as migrant workers abroad and to support their families at home. Over 5 million Bangladeshis migrated to work in the Gulf States between
1976 and 2009. About 3.2 million work in India today. Over the past decades the rate of migration has substantially increased. In 2010 3.5% of the whole population was working as migrants abroad
where they are super-exploited as cheap labor forces. Their remittances are essential not only for their families but for the whole economy since it represent 10.8 of the country’s GDP.
(16)

13. The core
of the Bangladeshi working class is without doubt the textile industry with about 4 million employees in 5,000 factories. The textile workers – most of them women – account for 45% of all
industrial employed. Their extremely low wages – some earn only $38 a month – and the well-known horrible working conditions have provoked even someone like Pope Francis to compare them to "slave
labor". (17) According to a report, the minimum wage represents only 4.1% of value added per worker (2012) which gives an indication of the huge extra-profits which the capitalists make.
(18)

14. The trade
union movement is relatively weak in Bangladesh. It is confined mainly to state-owned enterprises, with little presence in the private sector. According to official data, the trade unions had 2.2
million workers in June 2009. (19) There are about 5,242 Basic Unions which organize 4.44% of the employed and 33 National Trade Union Federations. (These National Federations organize 2.83% of
the employed, since not all Basic Unions are part of national federations.) (20) At this point it is important to bear in mind that the Bangladeshi labor force has a huge sector of either workers
who are formally not waged workers or toilers who are rather semi-proletarians or small petty bourgeois. The trade unions do not organize only waged workers but also these semi-proletarian
layers. As a result we have the situation that while the trade unions organize only 3-4% of the labor force, 22 % of the waged workers are trade union members. (21)

15. Women
constitute 14.4% of the trade union members (2009). While most trade union federations have a lower share, three unions – the Bangladesh Jatiya Sramik Jote (43%), the Jatiya Sramik Federation
(32.9%, this union is close to the Awami League) (22) and the Mukto Sramik Federation (31.7%) – have much higher shares since they are located in female workers dominated sectors like garments,
tea garden and manufacturing. (23) In the most important sector both for the working class and the female proletariat – the textile sector – there exist 26 union federations and 5,242 basic trade
unions in the garment sector. Out of the 3.5 to 4 million textile workers, mostly young women, only around 63,000 are unionized. (24)

16. The
reason for the highly fragmented character of the trade union movement is two-fold. First, as we have shown above, the workers and semi-proletarian layers are mostly employed in small enterprises
or self-employed. This strengthens the tendency for fragmentation and local unions. Secondly, the trade unions are highly politicized. Many unions are linked to political parties who use them as
pressure groups.

17.
Irrespective of the weak trade unions, Bangladesh is one of the world’s countries with the highest number of mass or general strikes (called hartals in South Asia). Leaving aside the
national liberation war with numerous hartals in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the mass uprising in 1990, it saw in the last decade particularly massive strikes in 2002, 2007 and 2010. (25)
This year has seen another upswing of strikes. According to the Commerce Ministry, there have been 36 nationwide shutdowns this year, compared with 29 last year and 17 in 2009 to 2011. More than
80 people have died in hartal-related bloodshed since January, while protesters have torched hundreds of buses and cars. “The strikes have cost the country more than $7 billion this year, or
more than $200 million for each day of strikes, the Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry estimates.” (26)

18. However
one has to be aware that such hartals are not necessarily the same as a general strike known in other countries. It is often a shutdown of business by militant demonstrations and street violence
by organized supporters of this or that party or union which causes business and schools to close. For example the Awami League – the current government party – called more than 170 days of
strikes when it was in opposition from 2001 to 2006 (i.e. about one hartal every one or two weeks in average!). (27)

The National Liberation War in 1971 and it’s Betrayal by the Bourgeois Nationalist Awami League in
alliance with Stalinism

19. When the
Pakistan state was created in 1948 as a result of reactionary communalist war and expulsion of millions of Indian Muslims and Hindus, Bangladesh was part of Pakistan (called East Pakistan). (28)
This partition was particularly horrible for the Bengal people because it split them into a Muslim territory (East Pakistan) and a Hindu territory (West-Bengal in India). Two million Bengalis
were slaughtered in this reactionary partition war in 1947/48. This was a genocide inspired by the British imperialists and executed by the bourgeois Indian Congress Party and the Muslim League.
As a side-note we remark that such a division of the Bengal people was always the desire of the British imperialists. The two previous attempts to achieve this – in 1905 and 1908 – were defeated
by the joint Muslim and Hindu Bengal resistance. The hymn “O amar Sonar Bangla” – created during this struggles – is the national anthem of Bangladesh today. The British fought the
Bengalis particularly strong because there were in the forefront of the anti-colonial liberation struggle. The Indian National Congress was founded there in 1885 and most leaders of the
liberation movement were Bengalis.

20. East
Pakistan was oppressed in this state from the beginning. Between 1948 and 1951, 130 million Rupees were sanctioned for development. Of this only 22 percent were allocated to East Pakistan despite
the fact that it inhabited more than half of the population. For more than 20 years West Pakistani capital extracted Rs 3 billion annually from the east. West Pakistan dominated Eastern Pakistan
policy in many ways. For example while East Pakistan could elect an assembly, the more powerful governor was appointing by the West. Furthermore the ruling class tried to eliminate the Bengali
language by imposing the dominant language of the West – Urdu – to public life in East Pakistan. As we have explained in our documents on Pakistan, this was the result of the reactionary
character of the Pakistani state which was dominated from the beginning by the ethnically Urdu-speaking elite of big land owners, army leaders and capitalists and which ruled the country for most
of the time via a military dictatorship.

21. The
Bengali people in East Pakistan resisted the West Pakistan “colonialism” from the beginning. This struggle was lead by the Awami League led by of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. This was a
bourgeois nationalist party with strong roots amongst the popular masses. Whenever the ruling class allowed elections in East Pakistan, the Awami League won with a huge majority of the votes.
However as a bourgeois party it tried to contain the mass struggle and use it only as a pressure tool for negotiations. It also developed pro-imperialist positions. As a result opposition grew in
the party against Rahman’s policy. Finally the Awami League split in 1957 when a left wing – led by Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani (called the “Red Maulana”) – formed the National Awami
Party. This was a petty-bourgeois nationalist party with sympathies for Maoist China. In general, Maoism became a strong and popular current at this time. (29)

22. The
national liberation struggle of the people of Bangladesh expressed itself in numerous mass demonstrations, hartals, campaign of civil disobedience, etc. When a revolutionary period opened in the
whole of Pakistan in 1968, the Bengali struggle culminated in a mass uprising and a guerilla war. The Pakistani ruling class tried to suppress this uprising with the most brutal means. As a
side-note we remark that Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and his Pakistan People’s Party – which is admired by Alan Wood’s and Lal Khan’s IMT as a “revolutionary” and “socialist” – supported this reactionary
war of oppression against the Bengali people in 1968-1971.

23. During
this national liberation struggle – led by the left wing of the Mukti Bahini (the Bengali Liberation Army) and the Jatyo Samajtantrik Dal (a radical left spit from the National
Awami Party) – the masses created punchayats (soviets) in the liberated territories. A central force amongst the left wing of the Mukti Bahini was the Maoist Purba Banglar Sarbahara
Party (Proletarian Party of East Bengal) led by Siraj Sikder. This was the only Maoist force which supported the liberation struggle and indeed played a central and heroic role. After
gaining independence the PBSP denounced the “false freedom,” led an armed struggle, and called for a “socialist revolution” against the Awami League-led regime. It finally became the most
important opposition force against the government and organized a successful two-day hartal in December 1974. Weeks later it was brutally crushed by the regime which had become a one-party
dictatorship and Siraj Sikder – who has become a kind of national hero since then – was killed in prison. (30)

24. The
National Liberation War led to another traumatic experience for the Bangladeshi people – the second genocide in little more than two decades! . The Pakistani army waged a war of annihilation
against the people. It used paramilitary death squads – amongst which the Jamaat-e-Islami played a central role – which organized numerous massacres. As a result three million people were killed,
ten million people had to flee to India, and between 200,000 and 400,000 women were raped. According to a UN report, 70% of all villages were destroyed by the Pakistan army and its local death
squads. Nevertheless the Pakistani army could not suppress the revolution and – in December 1971 – the Indian army invaded the country and finally defeated the Pakistani army in 13 days. The main
reason for the Indian invasion was to pacify the ongoing revolution and to stop the spread of soviets in their neighboring country. This was particularly important for the Indian ruling class
also because at the same time – on the other side of the border – a mass rebellion of the peasants in West Bengal was going on. (the Naxalite movement). (31) US imperialism, worried by
the revolutionary events, sent the Seventh Fleet into the Bay of Bengal. In the end, Bangladesh became independent in December 1971. However, due to this unfinished national liberation war, the
country has been since then a capitalist semi-colony, dependent of imperialist powers and India.

25. The Awami
League took over power and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman – with the support of the pro-Moscow Stalinists – turned to smash the growing left-wing oppositional forces. The regime allied itself with Moscow.
At the same time US imperialism imposed a grain-embargo on Bangladesh which provoked the Bengal famine of 1974 in which 100,000 people died. The regime became more and more unpopular and in 1975
Rahman created the Bangladesh Krishok Sramik Awami League (BAKSAL, Bangladesh Farmers and Workers Awami League) which incorporated the Communist Party. All other parties were banned. On
15 August 1975 a sector of the army killed Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and nearly all his family members.

26. The
Revolution was defeated because of the betrayal of bourgeois and Stalinist forces. The Awami League always played a hesitant role in the liberation struggle and – after coming to power – defended
capitalism and suppressed the working class struggle. The National Awami Party was more radical and Red Maulana was a sincere petty-bourgeois leader. But when Mao Tse-tung told him in
1969 not to support the independence struggle, the National Awami Party stopped its active role in the liberation struggle. (Maoist China always had an alliance with the Pakistani military
dictatorships against India and instructed its international supporters to subordinate their struggle to its foreign policy calculations.) After independence it became a critical opposition party
against the government but refused to launch any serious struggle. The pro-Moscow Stalinists – implementing their treacherous popular front policy – fully supported the Awami Party and its
dictatorship and joined the struggle against the left-wing rebellion in 1972-75. (32) The Maoist forces – with the important exception of Siraj Sikder’s Purba Banglar Sarbahara Party –
either supported the Pakistani army or took a neutral stand. And the Purba Banglar Sarbahara Party – despite taking the correct side in the national liberation war and against the Awami League
government – undermined the struggle by choosing the guerrilla struggle instead of a Bolshevik orientation towards mass work in the enterprises and the cities in order to prepare a general strike
and an armed uprising.

Brief History from 1975 until today

27. After the
killing of Rahman several coup d’états and counter-coups were staged and finally Major General Zia-ur Rahman became the new military dictator in November 1975. He founded the Bangladesh
Nationalist Party (BNP) and got himself elected as president in rigged elections in May 1979. He initiated a slow re-orientation towards Western imperialism. He was killed in May 1981. After a
brief period in which his deputy president, Abdus Sattar ruled, another military coup d’état in March 1982 brought General Ershad to power who ruled until December 1990. While several elections
took place in this period (1979, 1981, 1986 and 1988), they were completely rigged and boycotted by the masses (only about 5-8% of the population participated in them). The highly corrupt regime
of General Ershad enforced a policy of opening Bangladesh’s economy to imperialist capital (liberalization of trade, privatization of public enterprises, etc.). Finally it was overthrown by a
mass uprising in November 1990 in which nearly all parties – from the left-wing parties, the Awami League, and the BNP to the Jamaat-e-Islami – participated.

28. The
parliamentary elections in February 1991 resulted in a victory for the conservative BNP led by Khaleda Zia, General Zia-ur Rahman's widow. The BNP had formed an alliance with Jamaat-e-Islami and
was also aligned with the army command. Since then Bangladesh has seen a regular switch between a government of Khaleda Zia’ BNP and a government of Alawi League led by Sheikh Hasina, the
daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Hence the BNP ruled in 1991-1996 and 2001–2006 and the Awami League was in office in 1996 to 2001 as well as from December 2008 until today (see Table 5 for the
percentage in votes for the major parties). In 2007 and 2008 another military-led regime usurped power via a coup d’état. Since 1991 these two parties acted in government as semi-colonial lackeys
for imperialist capital, they privatized its public enterprises, opened the domestic market for foreign corporations, and built a textile industry which serves imperialism as a cheap resource for
extra-profits.

29. Both –
the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party – are bourgeois parties dominated by a family dynasty. While there is no qualitative difference between the two – they both share the same
class character as capitalist parties – several differences exist between them. These are related to their different historical formations. The Awami League – founded in 1949 – has its historic
roots in the Bengal nationalist movement for more national rights, autonomy and finally independence. This nationalist policy – in opposite to the reactionary Islamist regime of West Pakistan –
pushed it towards a secular and verbally socialist agenda. (As a result, by the way, Bangladesh is still called a “People’s Republic”). Naturally, this “socialism” was always
hypocritical and was dropped for “free-market” rhetoric after 1991. However it was always marked strongly by a middle-class nationalism which was related to a just national liberation struggle.
As a result of its more secular character, the Awami League gains particularly strong support amongst the countries minorities. (33) Another result of the Awami League’s history is its
traditional alliance with the Communist Party and other petty-bourgeois progressive forces. This is an important reason why the army officer corps – which always hated the liberation struggle –
throughout the whole history of the country had an ambivalent relationship towards the Awami League. The army was traditionally dominated by the old Pakistani military bureaucracy: In 1975, out
of the 36,000 men in the armed forces, 28,000 were repatriates from West Pakistan. (34) The Awami League leadership also did not really trust the army command so, between 1971 and 1975, Sheikh
Mujibur Rahman built his own paramilitary units – the Jatiya Rakkhi Bahini which were directly under the command of the Prime Minister's Office and trained by the Indian Army. Naturally
this annoyed the army command and was an important reason for its coup d’état in August 1975. The Awami League is particularly rooted in the industrial heart of country – the Dhaka region – where
it always became the strongest party in the elections even when it lost them nationally.

30. The
conservative BNP on the other hand is more closely related to the capitalist class and the army officer corps of the country. (35) This is
not surprising since it was created by the military dictator General Zia-ur Rahman. For the same reason it has repeatedly formed – as it also does today – alliances with several right-wing
Islamist parties like Jamaat-e-Islami.

31. There are
strong similarities between Bangladesh and other South Asian countries. As we noted of the two main bourgeois parties in Bangladesh one (the Awami League) is linked to the liberation struggle and
has a history of a left-leaning (in words, at least) militant petty-bourgeois rank and file while the other (the Bangladeshi Nationalist Party) was a conservative reaction against this. This
dichotomy has a strong similarity to the situation in Sri Lanka, where there are the Sri LankanFreedom Party – which had a radical nationalist, anti-imperialist rhetoric in the
past – and the more conservative United National Party. Similar too, to a certain degree, is the situation in India, with the bourgeois Indian National Congress of the Ghandi clan and
the right-wing Hindu-chauvinist BJP. Or take, on the one hand, the bourgeois Pakistan Peoples Party of the Bhutto clan, which used some “socialist” populist as well as pro-democracy rhetoric in
the past, while on the other hand there is the more conservative Pakistan Muslim League. All these parties are bourgeois forces which revolutionaries would never support politically.
This however must not make Marxists blind to different histories and different appeals to the masses which such parties can posses.

32. Since the
country must be characterized as a poor capitalist semi-colony, it has neither a strong bourgeoisie nor a large and relatively wealthy middle class which could form the basis for a relatively
stable bourgeois democracy. Therefore the ruling class has always been in a relatively weak position in relation to the popular classes – which, one must not forget, have gone through a partially
successful liberation war. As a result, the bourgeoisie had to resort repeatedly to the rule via a military dictatorship (1975-1990, 2007-08). Add to this the first years of independence,
1971-75, which were marked by an escalating civil war. In general, the army plays a central role in Bangladesh’s politics. It has grown substantially towards nearly half a million personal if one
includes the paramilitary border guards. It has built – similar to the Pakistani, Egypt, or the Cuban military – a significant economic empire which gives it relative autonomy from the successive
governments and increases its power. A study on the Bangladeshi army concludes: “According to an estimate, SKS' gross turnover was nearly 2 billion BTK in 1995 when it owned 15 industrial and
two commercial units, five sales outlets and 15 real estates. Since then the SKS' empire has grown significantly, so has its turnover. Today it fully owns nine industries and two commercial
units. In addition, it owns four sales promotion offices, 28 real estates ventures and holds shares in three internationally reputed enterprises.” (36) Even when the country has a
parliamentary elected government, the political situation is often very unstable and marked by series of hartals against the ruling party. This makes the army a safety net for the capitalist
class, essential as underlined by its recent coup in early 2007 as well as two smaller attempted coups in 2009 and 2012.

33. As noted
above the Bangladeshi army has been largely reconstructed via the old state apparatus from the time when the country was part of Pakistan. Only a few liberation fighters of the independence war
have been integrated into its ranks (this is similar to South Africa after 1994.) This, however, is an additional factor why the army command and the ruling class have an interest to rebuild and
reintegrate pro-Pakistani political forces, Islamists, and reactionary death squads. This is also the reason that the army command and the ruling class have avoided any serious investigations and
trials against the reactionary mass murder.

34. Finally,
we re-emphasize that Bangladesh has gone through a tumultuous history in the past 130 years or so, replete with liberation struggles, wars, and genocide. Bengal was the heart of the anti-colonial
resistance against the British imperialists. When it successfully drove out the British in 1947/48, it paid for the unfinished national democratic revolution with genocide. Two decades later, the
Bengali workers and peasants started another liberation struggle – this time against the Punjabi bourgeoisie and army command of West Pakistan. Again, it won independence but it had to pay for it
once more with genocide. And after they won independence, the workers and peasants recognized that this was a “dirty independence” full of hunger and empty of freedom. Since then the
Bangladeshi masses have expressed their revolutionary energy in another mass uprising in 1990 and an innumerable number of hartals. The Bangladeshi working class and poor peasants have a
remarkable history of revolution and sacrifice which is equaled only by a very few peoples around the world. As a result there is a strong tradition of “revolutionary Marxism” in Bangladesh,
unfortunately mostly under the banner of Maoism and Stalinism. (37)

The Social and Political Crisis in Bangladesh Today

35. Since the
Awami League retook power in 2008 the social and political crisis has sharpened. The crisis of world capitalism which started in 2008 naturally had massive effects on a country like Bangladesh
which is so massively exposed to the iron laws of the imperialist-dominated world market. Even the state bureaucracy has to admit that poverty and unemployment figures have increased in the last
years. This social crisis has been combined with the well-known catastrophes in the textile industry – most tragically the collapse of a garment factory in the Rana Plaza complex on April 24,
2013 in which at least 1,045 textile workers were killed. This was a highly political tragedy since the compliancy of the state bureaucracy with the factory owners is well-known and, in this
specific case, because the owner of the collapsed textile factory, Sohel Rana, is associated with the ruling Awami League.

36. Against
the background of the crisis, the mostly female textile workers have initiated a series of strikes in the past years. Between 19 and 23 June, 2010, 800,000 workers went on strike to demand a wage
increase. In July and August, nearly 700 factories were affected by strike waves, again on the question of wages. In December, new mobilizations took place to obtain the payment of the wage
increase that had been won in August and had still not been paid by November. Since then there have been a series of strikes. In April 2013, after the collapse of a factory in the Rana Plaza
complex, hundreds of thousands of garment workers stopped work. And recently, in September 2013, 200,000 textile workers ceased work and demonstrated on the streets where they fought with the
police.

37. It is not
surprisingly that the government of Sheikh Hasina has become increasingly unpopular. To counter this trend and in order to avoid defeat at the upcoming parliamentary elections in early 2014, the
Awami League tries to present itself as a consistent fighter against those involved in the genocide of 1971 – i.e. the reactionary anti-democratic forces in the army and the extreme right-wing
Islamist forces like Jamaat-e-Islami. Soon after it came to power, Hasina’s government restored the four fundamental secular principles of the constitution enacted by her father. This provoked
many Islamist parties and, in February 2009, the national border guards – a particularly ferocious and notorious paramilitary unit known as the Bangladesh Rifles – staged a mutiny in which some
70 people, including 57 army officers, were killed. Today one of the main issues of the Islamist fundamentalist forces is the change of the constitution and the imposition of Sharia law.

38. The
Hasina government also banned 12 Islamist fundamentalist organizations with links to terrorist organizations (like Jamaat-ul Mujahideen, which was supposed to have links to the banned Pakistani
terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba). (38) It initiated the so-called International Crimes Tribunal (it is not international but a tribunal of the Bangladeshi state) and brought a number politicians
and army officers who were involved in the genocide to court. This included a number of army officers who were involved in the slaughter of Sheikh Mujibur and his family in 1975 and which were
now executed. It also includes leading politicians of the right wing Jamaat-e-Islami, like its former chief Golam Azam or Abdul Quader Mollah. Recently in September 2013, Mollah was sentenced to
death for crimes against humanity during the nation's 1971 independence war against Pakistan. (39) The government is also considering banning Jamaat-e-Islami. In August, the Bangladesh High Court
deregistered Jamaat-e-Islami), thereby banning it from participating in future elections. To stop the persecution of army officers, some forces in the army officer corps – which was supposed to
have links with the outlawed right-wing Islamist fundamentalist Hizbut-Tahrir –planned a coup d’état in January 2013 which was foiled. Islamist fundamentalist forces like Jamaat-e-Islami have
already called the army command to intervene, i.e. to overthrow the Awami League government.

39. Against
the background of this growing class polarization and the increasing conflict between a government which supposedly wants to advance the democratic struggle against the reactionary
anti-liberation forces and sectors of the army and the Islamist fundamentalist, a new mass movement has emerged – the Gano Jagaran Mancha (Mass Awakening Platform) or also called the
Shahbagh Awakening because of the name of the main square where it assembled. This mass movement emerged spontaneously in January 2013 and mobilized several hundreds of thousands of
people for about one month. Similarly to the Arab Spring, the people occupied the Shahbagh square. Similarly to the Occupy movement, it was spontaneous, without a leadership and dominated by
middle class youth and university students. Also similarly, they refused to allow political parties to take the stage. Instead, freedom fighters and activists are invited to speak. The movement
protested against the violent offensive of the Islamist fundamentalists who have launched a series of violent attacks against the left and progressive forces. A particular provocation was the
murder of the protest activist and blogger, Ahmed Rajib Haider, who was brutally slaughtered outside his home in Dhaka, allegedly by Jamaat activists. The movement opposes the Islamist
fundamentalists’ offensive for Sharia law and defends the secular constitution. It also demands the death penalty for those who participated in the genocide in 1971 as well as a ban of the
Islamist fundamentalist parties. In addition, the Awakening calls for social boycott and government actions against banks, businesses and social service providers linked with Jamaat. While its
agenda coincided with the Awami League, the movement was not a government tool (they didn’t allow Awami League politicians to speak) but reflected the spontaneous democratic radicalization of the
urban middle class youth. (40)

40. In short
the Shahbagh movement was a progressive petty-bourgeois democratic movement which insisted on a consistent democratic purge of the army and the political parties against the open
counter-revolutionary elements which participated in the genocide of 1971 and which attack the left and workers movement since then. However, the program and the methods of their democratic
program are petty-bourgeois and wrong.

41. So let us
summarize the situation: the Awami League government defends the capitalist order which – faced with the new crisis period of the world economy – brings more and more misery to the Bangladeshi
popular masses. The number of strikes is increasing and the government becomes more and more unpopular. It tries to deflect attention from its political bankruptcy by advancing the democratic
issue – in a bourgeois way via state repression – of purging the army and the political life from the counter-revolutionary pro-genocide forces. The Awami League calculates that with such a
policy it can on one hand weaken its opponent, the BNP which is allied with the Islamist fundamentalist, and at the same time win some popular support for the incoming elections. Naturally, from
the side of the Awami leaders this is nothing but a cynical populist maneuver: Why did they not raise the issue of war tribunals when they were in power in the past, but only now?! In addition,
why did they collaborate with Jamaat-e-Islami on several occasions in the past?! However, political issues are not limited to the intentions of one side. What is important is what this or that
policy objectively represents and what the masses think.

42. The
objective meaning for the class struggle becomes clear if we take into account that Bangladesh is characterized by an unfinished national and democratic revolution. It is unfinished because the
country remains a semi-colony of imperialism and because the anti-democratic institutions (the army and the counter-revolutionary Islamist fundamentalists) still play a central role the political
life. In addition to this the workers are still struggling for the 8 hour working day and the poor peasants demand land. The struggle against the army command as well as the reactionary Islamists
is therefore a central issue of the class struggle in Bangladesh.

43. However
revolutionaries have a different approach than the bourgeois and corrupt Awami politicians as well as that of the honest middle class youth. While they want to defeat the counter-revolution with
the help of the bourgeois state machinery, revolutionaries have a different program. We call for class struggle methods. We call for mass mobilizations and armed workers and poor peasant militias
to defeat the reactionary Islamists. We call for Workers and Peasant Tribunals to investigate the crimes of the accused politicians and army officers. We call for the combination of the
democratic struggle and the ongoing workers struggles – particularly in the textile industry – in order to advance the struggle.

44. At the
same time revolutionaries must warn against the sinister calculations of the ruling Awami League. They want – under the cover of the democratic struggle against the counter-revolutionaries – to
limit democratic rights by banning a number of right-wing Islamist parties. We have seen in the 1971-75 period that the Awami League is not at all a democratic party. The class conscious workers
and poor would be blinded if they believe that the ban of these parties is a progress for the class struggle. In fact it will only strengthen the state apparatus. We are opposed to such bans as
we are opposed to bourgeois courts investigating and ruling on these reactionary army officers and Islamist politicians. We call for Workers and Peasant Tribunals and the smashing of such parties
via mass mobilizations and armed workers and peasant militias.

History and Class Character of Jamaat-e-Islami

45. Let us
finally elaborate a characterization of Jamaat-e-Islami. Throughout its entire history, this party has always played an active force on the side of the counter-revolution. With the brief
exception of the mass uprising in November 1990 (in which all parties participated) it never joined the progressive democratic and class struggles but – quite the opposite – it joined
the counter-revolutionary side. During the decades of the Pakistani state, it fully supported the military dictatorship in Islamabad and even opposed equal rights of the Bengali language. During
the Liberation War it supported the genocide of the Pakistani army and was actively involved in organizing death squads.

46. This
concrete history – not the ideology – differentiates Jamaat-e-Islami from several other Islamist parties in the international arena. Irrespective of their Islamist agenda, forces like Hamas have
remained for many years at the top of the Palestinian national resistance. Hezbollah has led heroic national liberation wars against Zionism and its agents. The Muslim Brotherhood was suppressed
by the dictatorship for decades and when the Revolution started in January 2011 it joined it, albeit belatedly. Al-Nusra in Syria is part of the revolutionary civil war against the Assad
dictatorship. Even the reactionary Taliban are different from Jamaat-e-Islami since they have stood at the top of national liberation struggle for more than a decade. Even in Western imperialist
countries one can have the situation that Islamists represent important segments of the oppressed migrants. Because of this historic difference, Jamaat-e-Islami never became a mass party, while
the other parties mentioned above did. According to a recent opinion poll in January, Jamaat’s support was only 1%. It is because of this specific situation when Islamists are involved in a just
democratic struggle, revolutionaries will consider the application of the united front tactic. However if an Islamist force is never part of a just struggle, this is neither possible nor
desirable.

47. In the
1980s, Jamaat-e-Islami started to remodel itself and become a more respectable parliamentary party. It is a right-wing bourgeois Islamist fundamentalist party. It made tactical alliance with each
major political party in the country in the decades since. In 1991, Jamaat-e-Islami supported the BNP government. By the mid-1990s, the Jamaat-e-Islami collaborated with the Awami League in
street protests against the BNP government. It reconciled with BNP ahead of the parliamentary election of 2001 and has kept this alliance since then.

48.
Jamaat-e-Islami is a small party which gained at the two elections in the last ten years only about 4.5% of the votes (see Table 6). The party has no support amongst the working class and does
not even try to achieve it. According to an observer: “In the urban seats around Dhaka that usually swings in every election, the Jamaat’s support is virtually non-existent.” (41) It
always contests a small number of districts at the elections (about 50 of 300). These districts are rural areas close to the border with India where they try to win votes amongst the peasants
with a rabid anti-India chauvinist demagogy. The only two members of parliament it currently holds have been elected in the backward province of Chittagong Division which has a literacy rate is
22.08% and where one can buy and manipulate votes with the help of the state and the big land owners.

49. However
despite its small size, Jamaat-e-Islami is an important party in Bangladeshi politics. First it is a king maker for the BNP. Therefore the BNP supports it now and helps it to organize
demonstrations against the Awami League government. Secondly, through its support for BNP government’s in the past it got access to important positions in the state apparatus and business. During
the BNP government in 2001-06 it received the ministry of social welfare which helped the party to substantially finance a number of its social service institutions as well as madrasses. It also
brought the Islami Bank under its control which has become the third largest bank in the country. It also receives financial support from several regimes in the Gulf. (42) Like all parties, it
has a trade union wing called “Bangladesh Sramik Kallayan” but this seems to be very small (it might have some basis amongst the auto-rickshaw drivers.) However, given their financial resources
and clear Islamist fundamentalist agenda, it has a large and ideologically motivated cadre base.

50. The
reactionary character of the Jamaat-e-Islami and their Islamist allies also becomes visible from the fact that while it ignores the textile workers protests it currently campaigns for the
so-called 13 Point Demands. These demands are a completely reactionary attack against the secular constitution, the democratic rights of women, progressive forces and religious
minorities. (See the full list of the 13 demands below.) (43) While this campaign has been initiated by the Islamist fundamentalist group Hefazate Islam Bangladesh it has been joined by
Jamaat-e-Islamli, BNP and Ersahd’s Jatiyo Party.

Tactics in the Struggle against Jamaat-e-Islamli

51. So let us
summarize our conclusions and tactics. In our document “Thesis on Islamism” we have explained that Marxist do not judge Islamist forces primarily by its ideology but rather what is their
position in a concrete situation of given relations and struggles between the classes. From which classes do they get their support, against which classes are they fighting. Are they involved in
a progressive massive struggle (usually these are either anti-imperialist, national liberation, or anti-dictatorship struggles) or are they rather opposing or even oppressing it. (44) With this
method we give critical support to those Islamists who are involved in just struggles of the workers, peasants and lower middle classes. At the same time we make clear that their program is a
reactionary utopia and that the workers must fight independently under their own program. Where Islamist forces are not part of a progressive struggle there is no basis for critical support.
Where they are part of the active counter-revolution, revolutionaries must call the working class to fight them mercilessly. Of course, we fight them with proletarian methods – mass
mobilizations, workers and peasant tribunal, etc. – and not by calling the bourgeois state or even imperialism to intervene.

52. In the
concrete case of Bangladesh, we see Jamaat-e-Islami as an extreme right wing, bourgeois Islamist force which has played during its entire history of more than six decades a thoroughly reactionary
role as a murderous enemy of the working class and the oppressed. It is not nor has it ever been in the past six decades (with the brief exception of November 1990) part of any just struggle of
the popular masses. Quite the opposite, it joined the genocidal war in 1971 and slaughtered many people. It has been a central party to bring the conservative BNP to power. Today it has joined as
a central force a vicious campaign to abolish the secular constitution and to suppress the democratic rights of women, youth, etc. It is not with them and their supporters but with the textile
workers and the urban middle class and students of the Shahbagh movement towards which revolutionaries must align. These forces have to be won for a program of transitional demands which
helps them both to fight against the right-wing Islamist threat as well as against the ruling Awami government.

53. But at
the same time the RCIT warns against the wrong, bourgeois methods with which the Awami League tries to suppress the right-wing Islamists. We oppose their policy of banning those parties and of
putting the war criminals to a bourgeois court. We warn the workers that the Awami government could use the struggle against the Islamist fundamentalist as a pretext for attacking democratic
rights and creating an authoritarian regime. We call for Workers and Peasants Tribunals to bring the war criminals to justice. We call for mass mobilizations to smash those Islamist
fundamentalist which are a physical threat to the workers movement and democratic rights in general. We call for the transformation of the textile workers strike for higher wages into a general
strike and for the combination with the struggle against the right-wing threat of Islamist fundamentalism. The perspective of such a struggle must be the overthrow of the government and the
creation of a workers’ government with the support of the poor peasants and the urban poor, based on punchayats (soviets) and peasant armed workers and peasant militias.

For Working Class Independence! For a Revolutionary Party as part of the Fifth Workers’
International!

54. Despite
all the heroic efforts of the Bangladeshi working class, it still lacks a central precondition to liberate itself and all oppressed: mass organizations which are independent from the
bourgeoisie and its lackeys. The trade union federations are dominated by corrupt bureaucrats and mostly affiliated with bourgeois parties. There is no mass workers party. The Stalinist
Communist Party not only played a shameful role in supporting the bourgeois regime against the popular mass protests in 1971-75, but is until today in a strategic alliance with the bourgeois
Awami League in line with the notorious popular front policy. The remaining Maoist groups are trapped in ultra-left adventurism and opportunist maneuvers.

55. The
heroic struggle of the female textile workers is an excellent opportunity to overcome the tremendous weakness of the trade unions. It is decisive to overcome the divisions of the union movement
in many small unions. For united fronts of the unions in common struggles as a first step towards the formation of broad, mass unions which organise the workers in the whole industrial
branch! Given the fact that most of the Bangladeshi working class are not unionised, a broad recruitment campaign to build mass unions on a democratic basis is urgent. Defend the unions against
state repression! Against all laws which limit and restrict the rights of trade unions.

56. The trade
unions must be purged from the grip by the bureaucracy. This bureaucracy is a layer which is connected with the state and capital via jobs and privileges. It is out of touch with the interests
and living circumstances of the ordinary members. For a rank and file movement inside the unions against the bureaucracy! In each struggle it is important to advance the building of
mass rank and file Action Committees which strive to integrate all activists and workers independent if they are member of a union or not. The goal of such Action Committees must be to
transform themselves into broad, comprehensive combat organizations at the work place. This orientation is not in contradiction to the work within the existing mass organizations (trade unions,
etc.), but rather complement to these activities. The regular work within the unions at the grassroots against the bureaucracy improves the possibility of the independent organization of the
working class. The support of each opportunity to build broad committees of struggle in turn strengthens a grassroots movement inside the unions.

57. The
liberation of the Bangladeshi popular masses can only succeed if the struggle is led by the working class and its vanguard organized in a combat party. However to achieve this, the working class
must rally the poor peasants and the urban poor. It must help the poor peasants as well as the urban poor to build militant Action Committees. For a revolutionary peasant movement in alliance
with and under the leadership of the working class!

58. Most
importantly, the working class lacks its own party. Revolutionary socialists should support practical initiatives from sectors of the working class – in the unions, in other mass organizations
etc. – to build a new, independent Workers’ Party. While they should advocate a revolutionary program they should not make acceptance of it to a pre-condition from participation. They
should would rather work inside such a new workers party as a revolutionary wing, fighting for a Marxist program under all circumstances and try to win the majority of the party for it. Such a
Workers Party must refuse any political alliance – including electoral support – with bourgeois forces (like the Communist Party had done with the Awami Party).

59. Such a
Workers’ Party might be a possible but not necessary road to form the one and only instrument which can lead the working class to victory: a revolutionary combat party, based on the
lessons and experiences of the Bolsheviks who organised under the leadership of Lenin and Trotsky the first successful seizure of power of the workers and peasants. In an article on the tasks of
the Revolution in India, Trotsky compared the conditions for the revolutionary struggle with those in Russia in 1917. He concluded that the central difference is the lack of a Bolshevik party:
“…all those social peculiarities which made possible and unavoidable the October revolution are present in India in a still sharper form. In this country of poor peasants, the hegemony of the
city has no less a clear character than in czarist Russia. The concentration of industrial, commercial and banking power in the hands of the big bourgeoisie, primarily the foreign bourgeoisie, on
the one hand; a swift growth of a sharply defined proletariat, on the other, exclude the possibility of an independent role of the petty bourgeoisie of the city and to an extent the intellectual
and transform by this the political mechanics of the revolution into a struggle of the proletariat with the bourgeoisie for the leadership of the peasant masses. So far there is “only” one
condition missing: a Bolshevik Party. And that is where the problem lies now.” (45) Unfortunately, this is also true in Bangladesh today.

60. As there
can be no “socialism in one country”, neither can there exist a “revolutionary party in one country”. Leon Trotsky emphasised this basic truth repeatedly. In a reply to a critique he elaborated:
“Your conception of internationalism appears to me erroneous. In the final analysis, you take the International as a sum of national sections or as a product of the mutual influence of
national sections. This is, at least, a one-sided, undialectical and, therefore, wrong conception of the International. If the Communist Left throughout the world consisted of only five
individuals, they would have nonetheless been obliged to build an international organization simultaneously with the building of one or more national organizations. It is wrong to view a national
organization as the foundation and the international as a roof. The interrelation here is of an entirely different type. Marx and Engels started the communist movement in 1847 with an
international document and with the creation of an international organization. The same thing was repeated in the creation of the First International. The very same path was followed by the
Zimmerwald Left in preparation for the Third International. Today this road is dictated far more imperiously than in the days of Marx. It is, of course, possible in the epoch of imperialism for a
revolutionary proletarian tendency to arise in one or another country, but it cannot thrive and develop in one isolated country; on the very next day after its formation it must seek for or
create international ties, an international platform, an international organization. Because a guarantee of the correctness of the national policy can be found only along this road. A tendency
which remains shut-in nationally over a stretch of years, condemns itself irrevocably to degeneration.” (46) A revolutionary party today has to be build in close accordance with building a
revolutionary world party, the Fifth Workers’ International. As long as such a Bolshevik party does not exist, the heroic struggles of the masses can not successfully win liberation.
This is why the RCIT urges revolutionaries in Bangladesh to form a revolutionary Bolshevik organization as part of building a revolutionary international tendency to advance the formation of such
a party based on a program for socialist revolution. The RCIT is looking forward to collaborate with Bangladeshi revolutionaries in this historic mission.

For a Program of Socialist Revolution!

61. The RCIT
considers the elaboration of a revolutionary Action Program as a necessary precondition for the formation of a Bolshevik organization in Bangladesh. Such a program has to be based on the Marxist
scientific understanding that there can be no liberation of the working class and the oppressed without the overthrow of capitalism. Such a revolution will take place neither peacefully nor
gradually or via the parliament but only by an armed insurrection of the working class in alliance with the poor peasants and the urban poor and under the leadership of a revolutionary party.
Such a revolution will combine the democratic tasks – minimum economic demands for workers, distribution of the land to the peasants, struggle against the authoritarian state apparatus,
liberation of women and youth, etc. – with the socialist tasks of the expropriation of the bourgeoisie and the nationalization of the banks and industry under workers control. This is only
possible via the proletarian conquest of power and the smashing of the bourgeois state machinery and its replacement with the organs of the working class’ dictatorship. At the same time the
revolutionary struggle in Bangladesh must be understood as part of the international struggle for socialism in South Asia and worldwide. In short, the program of the revolution in Bangladesh is
the program of Permanent Revolution which links the democratic tasks with the goal of socialist revolution and the national with the international class struggle.

Defend the workers’ rights through consistent struggle against the capitalists!

* Support the textile workers demand for higher minimum wages! For an obligatory minimum wage for all
workers set by the trade unions and worker representatives! For coordinated campaigns of the unions in all branches for substantial wage increases for all workers!

* To protect workers’ wages against inflation a sliding scale of wages linked to a workers and poor
people’s cost of living index is needed! Build price control committees to stop the inflation!

* Jobs for all! For a public employment program financed by higher taxes for the rich!

* Full support for the Bangladeshi migrant workers abroad! For international trade union solidarity to
fight against the discrimination of migrants!

* Open the books of the enterprises so that people can control the accounts of the capitalists and
land owners and see their huge wealth!

* Stop all privatisation of public enterprises! Re-nationalisation of the enterprises privatised in
the past decades!

* Workers control in the enterprises so that workers can veto the management’s decisions!

* No payment of any interests to the banks! Cancellation of all debts – both to domestic and foreign
financial institutions!

* Nationalisation of all banks and fusion to one central state bank under workers control!

* Expropriation of the big business capitalists and big landowners! Nationalisation of their property
under control of the producers, i.e. the workers and peasants!

Liberate the poor peasants!

* Expropriate the Joteder (big land owners)! The land must be in the hands of the state under the
control of workers and poor peasants! The land to those who cultivate it! The local democratic actions council representatives of the poor and landless peasants have to decide the question of the
allocation and use of the land! Promotion of voluntary agricultural cooperatives and the formation of larger state production units!

* Cancel all debts of the peasants! For interest-free loans for small peasants!

* For a program of agricultural development elaborated under the control of the workers and the poor
peasants! For a radical change of direction in the agricultural economy! Away from the monoculture! For sustainable cultivation methods in agriculture! As much international transport of
agricultural product as necessary to supply the world's population as necessary and as much supplies of locally produced agricultural goods as possible!

International Emergency Plan against the capitalist Climate Crisis!

* For an international emergency plan against the climate crisis! For a plan to convert the energy and
transport system and for a global phasing out of fossil fuels and nuclear energy production connected to a public employment programme! For the massive exploration and use of alternative forms of
energy such as wind, tidal and solar power! For a global reforestation program of the woods! Radical expansion of public transport to push back individual car traffic!

* Nationalization under workers’ control of all energy companies and all companies that are
responsible for basic supplies such as water, agriculture and airlines, ship and rail facilities!

* Force the imperialist corporations and states to pay compensation to the semi-colonial countries for
the environmental destruction caused by them! No emissions trade and “ecological points” system!

Fight oppression of women and youth!

* Equal pay for equal work! Abolish child labour!

* For a public employment program to create the conditions for the socialization of housework and
simultaneously eliminate unemployment among women! For the massive construction of free, well-equipped 24-hour child-care facilities! For a wide range supply of affordable and high-quality public
restaurants and laundry facilities!

* Free access to free contraception and for the right of abortion!

* Fight against violence against women! For the expansion of public women safe houses, controlled by
women's organizations! For the formation of self-defence units by the workers' and women's movement against sexist violence!

* Public education for all youth financed by taxes on the rich! For a massive public investment
program to build schools close to the villages and plantation where the people live! For massive recruitment of more teachers to reduce the number of school students in each class!

* For the building of a revolutionary women's movement! For the right to caucus for women in the mass
organizations of workers and oppressed! For a revolutionary youth movement!

Revolutionary Struggle for Democracy! Down with the all-powerful military!

* Down with all-powerful Military! For a radical purge of the state apparatus! For the complete
screening of all state officials and their actions - especially police, army, intelligence, administration, legal, enterprise directors, etc. - under the control of workers and peasants councils!
Abolish the presidency!

* No to police and surveillance state! Against expanding the powers of police and courts! For the
replacement of the apparatus of repression by workers' and people's militia!

* Defence of the right to strike, freedom of speech and assembly, freedom of political and union
organizing, as well as the freedom to make use of all communication and information media!

* Radical democratization of the administration and jurisdiction: election and possibility to recall
of the entire administrative apparatus by the people!

* For Workers and Peasants Tribunals to bring the war criminals to justice!

* For the separation of state and religion! No privileges for religious institutions (taxes, religious
education at schools etc.)! For the transfer of the property of the clergy into the public hands to serve the needs of the people!

* For a revolutionary Constitutional Assembly! Such an assembly must not convened by the ruling class
but by the workers, poor peasants and urban poor! It will emerge as a result of an armed uprising and be protected by workers and peasants armed units! In such a Constitutional Assembly Marxists
will fight for a revolutionary program.

For a workers' government, based on the poor peasants and the urban poor

The working class and the oppressed will never get anything if they are not fighting for it themselves.
This is why they must resort to mass actions like strikes, demonstrations, occupations, general strikes and armed insurrection. For this they must organise themselves in action councils and
workers’ and peoples’ militias.

The goal of the struggle is the creation of a workers' government, based on the poor peasants and the
urban poor. Such a government must make a decisive break with the capitalist class.

* Nationalization of banks and fusion into a single central bank, nationalization of large companies,
large wholesale trade and transport, social, health, education and communication sector without compensation and under workers' control! Introduction of a foreign trade monopoly!

* Expropriation of the capitalist class and especially the banks, corporations and
speculators!

* For a workers' government, based on the poor peasants and the urban poor, on the basis of councils
in the enterprises and neighbourhoods as well as armed militias! Their representatives are under the direct election and recall-ability by the workers and receive not more than an average skilled
workers salary!

* For a socialist federation of workers and peasant republics in South Asia and beyond!

(31) By the way: this is another example of a liberation war with a contradictory character as we outlined
in our document Michael Pröbsting: “Liberation struggles and imperialist interference” (Revolutionary Communism No. 5,http://www.thecommunists.net/theory/liberation-struggle-and-imperialism/). While
communists naturally supported the national liberation war, they opposed the Indian army’s intervention. This reactionary intervention however did not lead communists to drop their support for
the liberation struggle.

(37) Leaving aside the old Communist Party and its splits – who usually ally themselves with the Awami
League – a number of centrist organizations are undertaking mass work. The Communist Party of Bangladesh (Marxist-Leninist) – which comes from a Maoist background but has now become a permanent
observer within the Mandelite “Fourth International” – claims: “On the ground, in spite of its divisions and its numerical weakness, the radical Bangladeshi left remains strong. Thanks to a
long tradition of struggle, it has won mass support among workers and peasants. Most of the political parties of the radical left have built mass organizations which have made possible the
development of spectacular struggles, with significant results. For example, the CPB-ML leads the Krishok and Kishani Sabha federations, two peasant organizations which represent Via Campesina in
Bangladesh and have two million members. Several political parties, such as the Revolutionary Workers’ Party and the Revolutionary Democratic Party, have built trade unions in the textile
industry. The parties of the radical Left have also developed work and built mass organizations aimed at students and women.” (Danielle Sabai: The left and social movement struggles in
Bangladesh, 9 November 2011,http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article2372)