In light of the new &quot;evidence&quot; is/was Bonds on steroids? In your opinion.

Poll ended at Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:40 pm

Yes

35

92%

No

3

8%

Total votes : 38

by Lofunzo » Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:04 pm

Transmogrifier wrote:I'm all for innocent until proven guilty--in a court of law!

As far as DK's reasoning goes, it seems, OJ is not a killer.

Agreed but LOL.

I don't see why everyone is in need of proof when he was just asking for an opinion. If leaked grand jury testimony isn't enough proof that he took something, then I don't know what is. Back to the issue at hand, all that he's asking for is whether you think that he ever took anything. I think that we can keep our lawyer-speak out of here and just give our opinion.

For the record, I think that he took them. I see no other reason why someone who was a HOF'er anyway can take his game to legendary status as he approached and passed 40 years of age. There might be an instance or 2 of a player having 1 great season but we are talking about a player who went from being a great player to being considered a top 3 all-time player based upon his numbers from age 36-40. I don't see how a player can trump his previous accomplishments as he approached 40.