The Bride Gathering Cult

The Semitic Bride Gathering Cult: A primary purpose and theme of J.E.M

Judaism is what we will term a Semitic Bride Gathering Cult. To be clear, it is not the only one. Islam in particular, and even Semites practicing Christianity or “Multiculturalism,” with access to degenerate or undefended Aryan populations qualify as well.

Of course with Islam, this Bride Gathering Cult exists in its rudest and most primitive form. In the most extreme cases, for example, we see the child sex rings that Rotherdam incident[1] made famous. Indeed, we know that this phenomenon, carefully protected by psychologically cowed yet criminally responsible Europeans, is widespread, if under current conditions, unknowable in scope. [2] After all, we understand behavior to be both genetic and cultural.

Indeed, it is important to understand “Semitic Bride Gathering” entails not merely the extracting of desired mating stocks from Aryan populations, but also, as well, the simple ruining of them as a means of also destroying a racial competitor. Hence a synonym that may be used in lieu of this term is perhaps more descriptive. That is the “Semitic Bride Culling Cult.”

However, the verb Gathering is advantageous as it emphasizes the important assimilative aspects of these cults. To wit, it eliminates, for all time, the stupid notion, particularly in the case of Judaism, that these cults are in practice and especially design, endogamous, even if containing endogamous elements. Indeed, we recognize endogamous, Orthodox sects of Judaism, for example, to be especially fecund. Even their myth is suggestive of this tendency.

We see this, for example, in Genesis with two of Jacob’s wives. These are the beautiful figure of Rachel, a clear Aryan as the JEM will reveal, and Leah, the mother of Judah and matriarch of the Jews. Rachel begets only two children, while the proto-Jew Leah has seven children, an important and especially “Jewish” number in the numerology. Nevertheless, the exogamous aspects of these cults are just as important particularly from our perspective where they represent mating and resource competition. For example, the fertility of the vast number of male Jews that marry out, particularly when social conditions are permissible, tends to outpace the more fecund endogamous pairs. These exogamous aspects, as we will discover, are heavily promoted in the JEM.

The beautiful Rachel and the “unloved” Leah. Esoterically, the first is an Aryan figure, the second a Jewish figure.

With Islam we see the operation of a Semitic Bride Gathering instinct in, for example, the Barbary slave trade, stretching from the mid-Renaissance until the 19th century. This is not to deny of course this slave trade was conducted for its explicit goal of acquiring slaves as was Islam’s wide spread enslavement of Africans from the 8th Century on. Yet it is to suggest that it was driven as well by a genetic instinct and, in particular, a Religious imperative, woven esoterically into that Religion, to acquire Aryan genes.

White slavery.

Indeed, the Semitic Bride Gathering Cult of Judaism likewise has as its goal the broader enslavement of Aryan mankind, if occurring even more completely, culturally and economically under the chimera of “democracy” or, as during the Middle Ages, “Christianity.” This is, in fact, a requisite for the extraction of such genetic resources.

The profoundest example of Islam as a Semitic Bride Gathering Cult, aside from its invited and uncontested proliferation today in Europe, is seen first and most strikingly in Islam’s first invasion of Europe which, curiously, began shortly after the Religion’s inception. Indeed, here we must assume we see in the “Abrahamic” faith of Islam, a cult, consciously authored by Judaism to weaponize an otherwise inert people to their ends.

Why indeed would an “anti-Semitic” Religion adopt a Jewish God and Jewish patriarchs? How, indeed, would they even have such close knowledge of such things? How suddenly do a people acquire this intelligence, organization, initiative and ability? Indeed, to the extent we accept any of the dubious historicity of the faith and its personages, might we assume Mohammed’s “Sahabah” were Jews? But of course, all this is made obvious by the consistent support Judaism lent to Islam both during its conquest of Europe, seen most emblematically in the opening of the gates of Toledo, and during its rule.

It is identical, in fact, to the support Judaism still lends to Islam as well as any immigrant into Aryan lands who is darker than those inhabited there. This is not, of course, to suggest Jews were not on both sides of this struggle, viewing Christianity as equally useful for their purposes, if the Aryan type still problematic. Like the contemporary anti-Islamic “neocon” we can be sure they were on both sides. These “pro-Western” Jewish types we will come to know as “Samaels.” Likewise this conflict between Islam and Christianity, whether then or now, is what we will come to understand as a “caducean struggle.”

Nevertheless, Islam’s Spanish “Caliphate of Cordoba”, like Germany’s Weimar period, is understood as a “Golden Age” for Judaism. Indeed, Judaism, to this day, in the main, unequivocally supports the conquering aim of Islam in Europe. This is true despite meaningless and ultimately innocuous and “theatrical” border disputes in the “Holy Land”, ostensibly, against Islam. Here a tiny band of poorly armed Arabs “threaten” a state backed by the United States of America. This is true despite the occasional hand wringing about the rise of Muslim anti-Semitism in Europe which it brazenly blames on Europeans.

Indeed, the presence of non-whites in general serves to assist rather than hamper Judaism in its Bride Gathering objective, as will be discussed. Hence it is revealed that the original Semitic Bride Gathering Cult of Judaism may develop “branches” or “tendrils”, whether Christianity, Islam, Communism or Multiculturalism, to fulfill its end, to gather the Aryan sun and nourishment to its body. In the symbolism of Islam, we see examples of esoteric incentives that push it toward its end. For example, the harem of virgins or Houri promised to the faithful in their “afterlife”, whether understood as actual or, less frequently, as metaphors, incite Muslims with a sexual objective.

Indeed, these Houri are described in the Koran as “fair”[3]with “wide and beautiful eyes”[4] as well as “full chested.”[5] All are traits especially of Aryan and Nordic women in contrast to Muslim women, as stereotype, science and even crass international surveys reveal.[6][7]The corresponding Hebrew adjective of Houri, hiwer, חיוור‎ , means “pale, whitish.” Hence, this licentious “after life” is as readily understood as the dream a Muslim has for his son in a conquered Aryan land. Child sex rings are the first harems as it turns out.

Manifestations of the Semitic Bride Gathering Cult of Islam, of course, may have common more muted expressions, particularly in the modern era. Here “proud”, put upon, “justifiably angry,” righteous Muslim men entering a European sexual market, acquire desirability. Here they are contrasted with competing Aryan men whom, under the imperatives of a Jewish implanted multicultural ethos, despise themselves. Here both Aryan women and Muslim man unconsciously, and even consciously, perceive the native men as the most loathsome cowards, fools or both.

In general, however, Judaism, in contrast to Islam is, obviously, a far more subtle, secretive and sophisticated Semitic Bride Gathering Cult. So subtle, indeed, it is only fully realized now. What is the evidence? The JEM indicates this, as we will review in this study and the science does as well.

Indeed, perhaps the least politicized and tendentious genetics studies seem to verify this. To wit, those studies that seem less supportive of legitimizing a Jewish claim to the physical state of Israel and hence revealing less genetic similarity to the neighboring Palestinians.

These ostensible less politicized studies determine Jews to be roughly, as they visibly appear, 50%-60% European and 40%-50% Semitic. Secondly they reveal that Judaism has passed primarily through the paternal line. That Northern Italian mothers are indicated as the maternal bearers of Judaism conforms with our understanding of history where Judaism gained especially a foothold in a declining Roman Empire through the Bride Gathering Mechanism of Christianity.

In other words, it is mistaken to believe this ancestry represents Aryan female conversion to Jewry per se but rather a temporary Jewish “conversion” to Christianity. Indeed, Communism, multicultural and liberal movements in the West since the early 19th century have doubtlessly served the same Bride Gathering purpose. Hence, immediately, two absurd notions are obliterated.

The first absurd notion that is destroyed, that should have been obvious to anyone, is that Jews are in any sense “racial separatists,” even if this becomes a tendency in later stages of inhabitation as the more desirable native mating stock is exhausted and even while there are separatist among them, preserving the Semitic element.

If this weren’t the case, than, obviously, Jews would move posthaste to Israel or, as a cohesive, wealth bearing race, at any time in their history, purchased the protection of some local king or potentate, as they were wont to do in any case, and settled a homogenous city, town or region, in any country along their path. This however is nottheir evolutionary design and quite contrary to their Religious goals. Rather, as the JEM reveals, they have always existed among Aryans and have always sought this attachment, for reasons genetic as well as economic.

The Bible makes this clear in Genesis: “God shall enlarge Japheth [Aryans], and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem [The Semitic ancestor of the Jews]; and Canaan [non-Whites] shall be his servant.”[8] Here there is a Jewish sense of cosmopolitan dominance and ownership in settled areas, to wit, “tents of Shem.” Likewise there is a clear sense of cohabitation with Aryans particularly on terms advantageous to Jews. There is no intention here for Jews to live apart from “Japheth.”

Japheth, Shem and Ham. Each represents the patriarch of different branch of humanity. Japheth, the European, Shem, the Semite and Ham, according to some readings, Africans or non-Whites more generally.

Indeed, one merely need consider how Jews have reacted to Aryan eugenic movements or moves toward purifying an Aryan type in the early and mid-twentieth century. These efforts have been met with a revealing, vehement Jewish hostility. Surely this arises from a simple genetic competitiveness where Jews are against Aryan improvement. However, as the genetics and the JEM reveal, a great portion of this anxiety is the fear that they will be denied access to Aryan genes, whether as genetic absorbers or spoilers.

Thus, in a manner, the hyperbole they posit that such separation will inexorably lead to a Jewish genocide is on some level true, even when there is no threat of violence from Aryans. To wit, Jews cannot be themselves or retain an identity recognizably Jewish without access to Aryan genes.

To be clear, my premise does not discount an instinct toward “eugenic” pairing within Judaism, as described by Macdonald, with intelligence as a primary criteria sought by parents for their daughters, yet it is to argue that factor is ultimately less important than an inflow of select Aryan genes.

I would contend that “eugenic pairings” among more separatist or Religious oriented Jews is obviated in the larger Jewish gene pool by a match making instinct among Religious Jews to marry off every Religious Jewish man. Here, because of a Jewish Bridge Gathering among Aryans, Jewish men, with a Religious prerogative to marry, among women also with a Religious prerogative to marry are, as a supply, in an advantageous deficit.

Likewise, because of emotional factors inherent in Judaism, where all members of an “embattled” community are viewed sympathetically, the value or even intelligence of every Jew is never precisely assessed, all are, as it is said, “chosen.” Thus an ethnic chauvinism skews perspective and doubtlessly mating selection. A similar nepotism, for example, can be seen in enrollment at Ivy League schools where clearly Jews have been granted greater access, despite merit.

Further beauty remains a criterion among all races of men, the very ability to procreate relies on it, and while among Aryans it may correlate strongly with innate intelligence —we need only look at the average IQs in Scandinavian countries— in a highly admixed gene pool of Judaism its appearance is a weaker guarantee. As in every mating market, whether the relatively closed one among Religious Jews or a larger one, male status will, as a rule, win female beauty.

[1] The Rotherdam Child Sexual Exploitation Scandal saw at least 1400 children, between 1997 and 2013 primarily white girls aged 11-15 sexual abused by “British-Pakistani” men in the English town of Rotherdam, South Yorkshire. This included beatings, gang rape and sex trafficking. It resulted as well in pregnancies. Originating in the late 80s, it was virtually unchallenged by local authorities.

[2] The May 2013 issue of UK’s Guardian reported: “A 2011 study by the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre looked at the 2,379 potential offenders caught grooming girls since 2008. Of 940 suspects whose race could be identified, 26% were Asian, 38% were white and 32% were recorded as unknown. Asians are roughly 7% of the population.” Asians in the UK context are a synonym for primarily Muslim, Middle Easterners.

[6] A July 2011 Study published by the Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology at Oxford in the Journal Biology Letters discovered that people who live at higher latitudes have larger brains and eyes theorizing both were required to process lower light settings.

[7] A map originating at TargetMap.com depicting average breast size across the globe was reported by several tabloids between 2012 – 2016 including Bild, Daily Mail, Mirror and Huffington Post. Averages in Europe ranged from larger than D cup in Scandinavian and Russia, D cup in Germany, C cup in the great majority of Europe and B cup in Spain, the site of Muslim colonization, as well as most of North African and the Middle East. Countries not indicated in North Africa and the Middle East as B cup were indicated as A cup., Certainly Europe was more Nordic prior to the Muslim invasions.