I began my bridge playing life as Jane Knapp, playing in Memphis, TN, Nashville, TN, and Summit, NJ.

In the mid-seventies, my husband Bill Eason and I played tourneys in New York and New Jersey. And we enjoyed home games and strong team games with our best friends, Bob and Linda Sartorious, plus many other wonderful bridge-playing friends in the area. On any given night, our 2-table home team games included several national champions. And we never missed the New Jersey Double K. O.'s at Essex Bridge Center, where, teamed up with the Sartorii, we played long matches against some of the strongest players in the area.

Besides Bob and Linda, our favorite team mates were John Rengstorff and Billy Erickson.

During a 20-year absence from F2F duplicate, I played on the Microsoft Zone as jobanjo. And I currently play with bots on BBO as MawJ.

My bridge jobs include directing club games in Summit, NJ and Memphis, TN, off and on for 50 years, and proof-reading a couple of World Champion Books and one Bridge Encyclopedia, under the direction of editor Henry Francis.

Bill and I currently live on a farm in north MS, near Memphis and the ACBL, where we have a dog, a cat, two horses and a mule.

Other hobbies include genealogy, online word games, driving my mule, horseback riding, and dining out with long-time friends, the Oshlags.

In a club game, which I was directing, a player revoked on defense. Neither he nor the opponents realized it. But, after the hand was over, his partner, an ACBL director, advised the table of the revoke and awarded the opponents one trick, the correct penalty for this revoke.

Neither side had called me to the table, but, after the round, the revoker's partner informed me of his actions.

He believed that, as an actively ethical player, he was doing the right thing to expose his partner's revoke.

I would appreciate your answering the poll and commenting further. And I hope you directors will say what you would have done on receiving such information.

I would never expose my partner's revoke, as this is neither required by law, nor is it a matter of ethics.

I realize I am not required to expose my partner's revoke, but I believe that as an actively ethical player, I should do so.

I believe it is wrong to expose my partner's unintentional revoke, as I am required to do the best for my side, as long as I am following the law and practicing active ethics.

This contains content that a reasonable person would consider offensive, abusive, or hate speech.

Spam

This is effectively an advertisement with no disclosure. It is not useful or relevant to the current conversation.

Other (additional description required)

This requires general moderator attention based on the Community Guidelines, Terms of Service, or for another reason not listed above.

Select a reason and click "Flag Post" to flag this for review. You may provide an optional (required if choosing other) description of why you find this objectionable. You may also wish to send a private message to to request him or her to edit or remove the .