(November 9, 2006 - I appeared as a witness before the Canadian House of
Commons Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans. Below is the text of my
verbal presentation and written brief submitted to the committee. After
receiving this information, the Members of Parliament did not ask me one
question regarding the two objections I had raised to the seal hunt: (1)
significant food web damage has already been sustained as a result of ocean
predator removal and seals should therefore be protected because of their
valuable role as natural predators, and (2) processing seals using only "fish
inspection" protocols risks passing mammalian bacterial diseases from seals to
human consumers.)

Three years ago, I explained to
this committee that starvation is the major factor preventing the recovery of
the cod stocks, and that this has resulted from a decline in plankton. Unless
fisheries managers begin to consider the health of the ocean overall, we stand
to see a total collapse of everything. Three years ago, my comments to this
effect were not included in your report on Atlantic Fisheries issues.

There is one reason why
ecosystem-based fisheries management is not now used in Canada. It is not
because we lack scientific understanding of what must be done; it is rather
because fisheries managers, including the seal hunt managers, simply refuse to
acknowledge that this information exists, and that it pertains to their work.

Scientists now realize that
fishing has undermined the fundamental workings of sea life, altering the entire
food web from top to bottom. The problems we now see in Atlantic Canada: the
starvation of cod, the decline of numerous other species, including everything
from sharks and herring, to barnacles and seaweed, along with a general
degradation of ocean water quality - these are manifestations of the ecological
end result of centuries of human fishing. As grim as that sounds, this
conclusion is well supported by the scientific literature.

The removal of virtually all
large predatory animals from the sea is now acknowledged as a major cause of the
current collapse of the ecosystem. That is why Canada should place a moratorium
on seal hunting, because seals are the last surviving large ocean predators in
Atlantic Canada, and as such their presence is needed. Large natural predators
are needed because the ocean is dying, and because the fish are starving.

Predators play an important role
in cycling nutrients and in maintaining the health of fish. The tonnage and
types of fish eaten by seals is beside the point. That question is like asking
how much blood is cycled through a person’s lungs. Fish removed by humans is
like blood drawn from a vein, while fish eaten by natural predators is like
blood following its normal course, a crucial process that must continue for the
survival of the larger entity: in this case, the ocean.

DFO ecologists use the word
“catastrophic” to describe ecological changes that have been caused by large
predator removal on the Scotian Shelf. Consider, too, that the ecological impact
of marine mammals was recently analyzed by other DFO scientists, including Mike
Hammill. The conclusion of this study was: “The beneficial predation effect is
even greater than the predation itself, leading to an overall positive impact of
the predator on the system.”

Why are these facts not
considered by seal hunt managers? Must the ocean exhibit signs and symptoms
beyond “catastrophic” before fisheries managers take notice that all is not
well, and before they take necessary steps to protect ocean health?

New ecological insights are
ignored by fisheries managers, who control what scientists are allowed to tell
them during their “science advisory process”. It seems that fisheries managers
must not be told certain things that the fishing industry does not want to hear.
Why do taxpayers fund ecological studies that are then ignored by our public
resource managers?

Ecologists are excluded from
fisheries management consultations, and if anyone else tries to enter their
findings into the record – as I did at DFO’s seal forum last November – then the
information is still ignored. When I tried to include DFO’s own ecosystem
science in the 2005 Seal Forum, my written submission was lost and omitted from
the record. Despite being asked repeatedly, DFO management refused to correct
their error.

I have tried for years to warn
the government about the ecological damage caused by fishing. I have suggested
since 1999 that a decline in plankton production has been caused by fishing, and
I have asked that plankton ecology become a focus of DFO Science research. Two
years ago, I warned of an impending crash of the herring stocks, and today that
seems to be happening in the Maritimes. Crustacean stocks are showing signs of
starvation too, and these fisheries will also be doomed if the ecological
breakdown continues.

Recommendations:

1. This committee should
undertake a study of issues affecting ocean health, with particular attention to
the ecological impact of fishing. In this regard, I will leave you with a
selection of relevant documents that I ask you to review.

2. Direct seal hunt managers to
include a full and open discussion with ocean ecologists before approving any
seal hunt plan. As it stands now, DFO does not even have a seal management plan,
although one was supposed to have been produced by last spring.

3. Direct DFO Science to provide
a comprehensive report on the full scope of what scientists have learned about
the ecological impact of fishing. Make it clear that this information is to be
considered by fisheries managers.

4. Create a new body like the
“Minister’s Advisory Council on Oceans.” A previous entity by that name provided
only broad policy advice, but a new Advisory Council on Oceans should be given
the mandate to advise the government on practical implementation of ocean
conservation. This must not be controlled by fishing interests.

5. Stop the seal hunt under the
Oceans Act, for ecological reasons already given. This will be preferable to
stopping the seal hunt after Canadian seal marketing causes an international
food safety incident. In this regard, I recommend that you consult with
veterinarians on the wisdom of processing seals for human consumption using only
“fish inspection” protocols, as is the current practice. Marketing seals as if
they were fish instead of meat is dishonest, it potentially threatens the health
of consumers, and it may thereby ultimately damage the good reputation of
Canada’s legitimate fish and meat exporting industries.