Confidence zone. Confidence zone types

A sportsman, in the course of preparation or already at the competition itself, is subjected to two thoughts “I want to win” and “I am afraid of losing". He considers participation in any event as a chance to win. And even if technically he is ready, the psychological aspect can give up and not lead to the desired result. Why it happens. There is a certain "zone of confidence", which is determined by the upper and lower thresholds. The top one is the number of winnings, one after the other, and the fear of losing the next time after a series of victories. The bottom is the number of continuous losses, and hence the fear of not winning again. The wider this zone, the more successful the sportsman is.
Confidence zone types
In psychology, all people are divided into 4 types by zone of confidence. And based on what type of sportsman belongs, his success depends.
• The first. High ambitions and a huge level of fear of losing.
• The Second. High ambitions and low fear of failure.
• The Third. Modest ambitions and a tremendous level of fear of losing.
• Fourth. Modest ambitions and low threshold of fear of failure.
The second type is the winner type. Such a sportsman is self-sufficient, self-confident, knows what he wants and what he aspires to. And to all this, he is not afraid to take risks and suffer defeats. He understands that mistakes are peculiar to all people. And he is also given the right to make a mistake, no matter what the responsibility lay on him. Errors do not affect the ambitious goals that he set for himself. Such people know that defeat gives an impetus to development and only shows shortcomings that can be corrected rather than upset by them. Unfortunately, only 20% of sportsmen are of this type. 80% - are the first type, where the fear of loss most often takes up over the desire to win.
The first type is prone to feelings because of its failures. They spend most of their energy on this. Any mistake knocks them out of the rut. They cannot analyze their own actions. Easily give in to worries about any wrong action. For failures, they usually blame the refereeing, the trainer, a bad mood or unfortunate circumstance - someone, but not themselves. From here they do not work on mistakes, but engage in self-flagellation, which hampers their development in a professional manner.
source: https://rebenokvsporte.ru