my comment wasn't to you, although the way the page arranged it made it look like it. My comment was to Ed52. Insults aren't necessary. I graduated medical school, so I think my reasoning skills are perfectly adequate.

Why is it "selfish" for someone two choose to be at risk from diseases that you and your children are immune to? If someone chooses not to be immune from measles, why is that any skin off of your nose? The only ones at risk would be those who choose to be at risk. Wouldn't touch you or your family in the slightest.

1. He ignores that violence in the name of Christ is specifically AGAINST Christ's teachings, and violence in the name of Muhammed is specifically SUPPORTED by Muhammed's teachings.
2. He equates the horrors happening in ISIS-controlled areas with the Jim Crow South, which was not in the same league in scale, violence, or purpose.
3. He ignores that the Crusades were brought on by the ferocity and violence of the Muslim invaders of Western lands, that they were a response to the Muslims atrocities, that Muslims were instructed to NEVER give up lands that were conquered by them by their prophet, that it was necessary to perpetrate brutality upon them in order that their will might be broken - otherwise, a 4-500 year war might ensure were they to be less brutal. The Crusaders perpetrated the same horrors on the Muslims that the Muslims had perpetrated on those they conquered. And also, he ignores the times, when these types of atrocities were common and usual in war, and not specific to Christianity at all.
4. He ignores that the evil past that he ascribes to Christianity was CORRECTED by corporate Christianity (no help from the Democrats), but the evil from Islam has never been corrected by corporate Islam - a vital difference.