The United States will impose steel and other metal tarrifs on Mexico, Canada, and the EU. All are large trading partners and allies of the United States. These trading partners will now have to retaliate. It is unclear if the President was on Ambien when he made this decision. Your thoughts?

I hark back to the past. I remember that when we were told not to do something the flippant (and common) retort was “Why not? It’s a free country.” You don’t hear it now. We know that things have changed. Sky and far-Left pressure group Demos have been surveying attitudes and they don’t like what they’ve discovered.

63 per cent of people think that life was better when they were growing up. The other 37 per cent can’t speak English and didn’t understand the question, probably. We know that immigration has been weaponised against the British people, that youngsters are ever more likely to not own a home that “public” services are crap and that a change will have to come.

2) Most “reputable” journalists are simply stenographers, repeating what they are fed. The media, worldwide, gleefully jumped on the news that another “prominent critic of Vladimir Putin” had been shot. No questions asked, no facts demanded, and no corroboration necessary. They are just stenographers.

Dr Sarah Wollaston, Conservative MP and chairwoman of the committee, said: “Children are becoming obese at an earlier age and staying obese for longer.

Children are becoming obese because of bad parents. That’s it. I ate cereals covered in sugar but I never became obese because I also ate healthy food and was always kicking a ball around or riding a bike. The same for millions of others. Children are naturally energetic. They should be running it off. No, the blunt truth is that fat children have bad parents.

It never occurs to these statist dunderheads that the more the state interferes in our lives the more we lose our sense of responsibility. When everything is the responsibility of the state then why do anything for yourself?

Note that the killer was supposidly “radicalised” in prison. This is not in the least surprising. I am informed that here in the UK, in several prisons, radical Muslims run the wings and call the shots. They groom new inmates and gain their friendship, then their conversion to Islam. The shocking truth is that Prisons are fertile recruiting grounds for Jihad and nothing is being done to prevent this.

The essence of our Justice system is underpinned with the idea that everyone is treated equallyunder the Law. The law must guarantee that no individual nor group of individuals should be privileged or discriminated against by the government. Yet recent years have seen some decisions being made that surely bring this into question. Just consider this.

So she pleased guilty to encouraging Jihad and yet she is spared a prison sentence. Meanwhile…and by way of legal comparison….

So essentially given a death sentence for “bacon crime” but a free pass for encouraging Jihad. What does this say to you about prevailing legal priorities?It’s not just a one-off situation that prevails in our courts as there is a disturbing trend emerging.

Convicted of paedophile crimes but spared prison? And this at a time when there is increasing recognition of widespread rape and grooming paedophile gangs operating across the UK. These are, factually, mainly of a Pakistani origin and so it is instructive to understand how our Judiciary deal with the issue.

In a further twist, AltNewsmedia understands that Anjem Choudary, an Islamist preacher accused of inspiring a generation of British jihadists, may be released from prison within months, and concern is mounting within police forces and MI5.

Anjem Choudary, 51, who was jailed in September 2016 for urging Muslims to support the terrorist group Isis, is expected to be released on licence in October.

So, just under two years in prison for actively urging Muslims to join Islamic State.Does that strike you as the British State taking Jihad seriously and sending a strong message that is will not be tolerated? Or is it a sign of a craven State crumbling in the face of a determined and ruthless enemy?

If the law is perceived to be placing one group above another that fatally undermines public confidence in our justice system. And if the law cannot be trusted to deliver justice fairly and impartially then the scales of justice could come crashing down. The rise of radical Islam in the UK is a fundamental challenge to our Establishment and the current response seems to be to give it a protected status, appease those who advance it, and damn all who dare criticise it. Perhaps the rise of Sharia Law in the UK is not that surprising when we see our centuries old legal framework failing to deliver justice for all of our citizens?

See the thread for further details. In short, President Mattarella of Italy, acting in defence of the EU, has vetoed Prime Minister Conte’s choice of finance minister (Paolo Savona). Savona opposes the Euro. There’s no 5 Star/Lega split, but the president is clearly not going to allow significant anti-EU ministers and policies to come through.

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

Copyright & copy; 2010 A Tangled Web (All rights reserved).Comments on articles here are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of A Tangled Web or David Vance. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise unacceptable may be deleted by the Editor. However the fact a particular comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by David Vance of the views expressed therein.