A meteorite mystery: Could this stone be the first meteorite from Mercury ever found?

April 5, 2013
by Diana Lutz

One of 35 meteorites of mysterious origin found in the Moroccan desert. This piece weighs 100 grams. The alphabet block to the right is a centimeter on a side. Credit: Stefan Ralew

(Phys.org) —Could this stone be the first meteorite from Mercury ever found? WUSTL's meteorite expert sifts the evidence.

Early in 2012, someone in Southern Morocco picked up 35 greenish stones, including the one shown above. Purchased by a dealer in Erfoud, Morocco, it was then resold to Stefan Ralew, a meteorite collector from Berlin.

The dealer was demanding a high price, and Ralew may have hesitated. But the wrinkled glassy coating on one face of the rock was clearly a fusion crust, a kind of glaze that forms when a meteorite is heated as it passes through the atmosphere.

Looking at other faces he would have recognized it as a type of meteorite called an achondrite, says Randy Korotev, WUSTL's meteorite expert. That meant it was an exceptional stone.

Most meteorites are stony, he explains, and of the stony meteorites, almost all (90 percent) are what are called ordinary chondrites. These are pieces of small, unmelted asteroids that are uniform in composition throughout.

The achondrites, on the other hand are pieces of large asteroids or planets, ones at least 200 kilometers in diameter. These produced enough internal heat early in their history to partially melt and segregate into a metal core surrounded by a rocky exterior. Achondrites, which come from the crust or mantle of these differentiated bodies make up only 5 percent of the stony meteorites that have been found.

So already this find was looking very interesting. Where might it be from? About half of the achondrites come from the large asteroid 4 Vesta. Others come from Mars, the moon, or other asteroids.

To answer the question of origin, the stone's chemistry had to be analyzed. Ralew shipped it to Tony Irving at the University of Washington. "Tony is where all the serious collectors go when they find strange meteorites," says Korotev, to whom Irving sends the "lunars" (possible lunar meteorites), which is what Korotev mainly studies.

Both the iron/manganese ratio of an asteroid and the ratios of its oxygen isotopes (variants of the oxygen atom) are thought to serve as "fingerprints" of its body of origin.

At the 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in March, Irving said that the stone, now officially designated Northwest Africa 7325 (NWA 7325), had highly unusual chemistry. What's more, he said, the chemistry was suspiciously similar to that measured by NASA's Messenger probe, which is currently surveying the surface of Mercury from orbit.

The large asteroid 4 Vesta is the parent body for roughly half the achondrite meteorites, but it doesn’t have the right chemistry to be the parent of the mystery meteorite. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCal/MPS/DLR/IDA

"It is high in magnesium and very low in iron, which is what they're seeing on the surface of Mercury," Korotev, who attended Irving's talk, says. "But it's got more plagioclase (an aluminum containing mineral) than they're seeing on the surface of Mercury and it plots funny in 'oxygen isotope space.' It's plotting in a region of oxygen isotope space where we've never had meteorite data points before—except for a few ureilites, which also have oddball chemistry."

Some chemical ratios didn't match, but Irving said that might be because the stone had been "excavated from depth," that is blasted into space by a collision that left a deep scar in Mercury.

This colorful view of Mercury was produced from images made by the Messenger space probe. The colors map the chemical, mineralogical, and physical differences between the rocks that make up Mercury’s surface. Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington

During the question and answer period after the talk, Tim McCoy, the curator of the meteorite collection at the Smithsonian Institution,

said that preliminary data suggested the meteorite had crystallized from the melt 4.5 billion years ago.

That made it implausible it was from Mercury, he said. Lunar highland rocks are 4.2 to 4.3 billion years old and Mercurian rocks should have crystallized at the same time or later than the lunar highland rocks.

That objection was persuasive to Korotev. "The moon began to crystallize 4.5 years ago," he says, "but we don't have any 4.5-billion-year-old meteorites from the moon, because all of those rocks would have been bashed to smithereens during the late heavy bombardment that pockmarked the moon with craters between 4 to 3.8 billion years ago."

Korotev once analyzed a series of glass bottles to see what made them green. The answer is various combinations of chromium and iron. The mystery meteorite includes minerals with much higher chromium content than any of the bottles, which explains its intriguing chartreuse color. Credit: Randy Korotev

"The same thing would have happened on Mercury," he said, "so the question is how did this rock survive for that long? There's no sign of it being brecciated, or busted up. "

"But if it's not from Mercury," he said, "then where is it from? That's really the question."

"It has very odd chemistry for a meteorite," Korotev. "If somebody had walked in with this chemical analysis and nothing else I would have told him that it wasn't a meteorite, just based on the chemistry," he says laughing.

After a moment, he adds, "They haven't talked about cosmogenic radionuclides yet. That would be really interesting."

Cosmogenic radionuclides provide a method for estimating how long a rock has been exposed to solar wind particles streaming off the sun and cosmic rays. "If this stone had exceedingly high cosmogenic nuclides," Korotev said, "that would be an argument for it coming from Mercury, because Mercury is so close to the sun.

In the meantime the Meteoritical Society, which adjudicates all matters having to do with meteorites, has classified NWA 7325 as "achondrite ungrouped," meaning that they believe it is a stone from a differentiated body like a planet or big asteroid but beyond that they are agnostic.

Although Korotev can't say where the meteorite comes from, he can say why it is such a peculiar green. The green comes from a silicate mineral laced with chromium.

"I once analyzed bottles to see what made them blue or green," Korotev says. The greenest bottle had 660 parts per million chromium, but some of the mineral components of NWA 7325 have 7,000 parts per million chromium. That's why it's green."

Related Stories

Pieces of the Moon and Mars have been found on Earth before, as well as chunks of Vesta and other asteroids, but what about the innermost planet, Mercury? That's where some researchers think this greenish meteorite may have ...

Last January two amateur meteorite hunters dropped by Randy Korotev's office at Washington University in St. Louis to show him their latest purchase, a 17-kilogram pallasite meteorite found in 2006 near Conception Junction ...

After extensive analyses by a team of scientists led by Carl Agee at the University of New Mexico, researchers have identified a new class of Martian meteorite that likely originated from the Mars's crust. It is also the ...

Scientists are abuzz about a coal-colored rock from Mars that landed in the Sahara desert: A yearlong analysis revealed it's quite different from other Martian meteorites. Not only is it older than most, it also contains ...

Asteroids are hunks of rock that orbit in the outer reaches of space, and scientists have generally assumed that their small size limited the types of rock that could form in their crusts. But two newly discovered meteorites ...

The constellation of Virgo (The Virgin) is especially rich in galaxies, due in part to the presence of a massive and gravitationally-bound collection of over 1300 galaxies called the Virgo Cluster. One particular member of ...

(Phys.org)—A small team of researchers from the U.S. and Italy has found evidence of a naturally formed quasicrystal in a sample obtained from the Khatyrka meteorite. In their paper published in the journal Scientific Reports, ...

As a cosmic dust magnet, Saturn's C ring gives away its youth. Once thought formed in an older, primordial era, the ring may be but a mere babe – less than 100 million years old, according to Cornell-led astronomers in ...

6 comments

It would be interesting to see what type of impact or volcanism would be powerful enough to eject material off Mercury resist the gravitational pull of the sun, enabling it to arrive on Earth. The chances of this happening would be incredibly slim… makes for a very rare and expensive piece of rock. Look forward to hearing more about it.

It would be interesting to see what type of impact or volcanism would be powerful enough to eject material off Mercury resist the gravitational pull of the sun, enabling it to arrive on Earth. The chances of this happening would be incredibly slim… makes for a very rare and expensive piece of rock. Look forward to hearing more about it.

It would be interesting to see what type of impact or volcanism would be powerful enough to eject material off Mercury resist the gravitational pull of the sun, enabling it to arrive on Earth. The chances of this happening would be incredibly slim… makes for a very rare and expensive piece of rock. Look forward to hearing more about it.

See how easy you were convinced by nothing more than conjecture?!

Convinced of what? Is there something about this you disagree with? I didn't sense this was much more than a question. We study the meteorite, we learn something. Maybe not what we expected.

Please sign in to add a comment.
Registration is free, and takes less than a minute.
Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.