December 08, 2016

With an anti-establishment figure poised to assume the presidency, isn’t it time to put anti-establishment media in the White House briefing room? Other than sacrificing the .1 percent of positive coverage Donald Trump might otherwise get from the mainstream media, it’s hard to see a downside.

As it stands right now, the establishment media (emedia) practically has a monopoly on access to the president. As Ari Fleischer, former press secretary for President G.W. Bush, wrote at the Wall Street Journal, “While approximately 750 reporters hold White House credentials, the briefing room holds 49 seats, and they are occupied overwhelmingly by mainstream media reporters, with barely any assigned to the new dot-com world.”

December 03, 2016

If you can't talk things out, you can only fight them out. Those who will not submit to reason, will only submit to force. In the video below, a female "social-justice warrior" college student exhibits the true face of the radical left, unreasonable, intolerant, hateful, dismissive, contemptuous and contemptible. She spews venom at the young white men talking to her as she makes clear that she isn't interested in debate, only venting her anger. She is quite literally the kind of person who, if she had the power, would have her political opponents murdered. Watch the video and see if you disagree.

December 01, 2016

In the video below, Sean Hannity discusses Muslim terrorism with three guests, one of whom is Imam Mohammad Ali Elahi, spiritual leader of the "House of Wisdom" in Dearbornistan Heights. At 5:28 in the video something very telling happens: Hannity cites a poll showing that a majority of Muslims in the U.S. believe they should have the right to decide whether they want to live under the Constitution or Sharia law, and then asks Elahi if he thinks Muslims should have that choice. What do you think his answer was?

If you guessed that he dodged the question, go to the head of the class.

Unfortunately, Hannity made the mistake of not pressing the matter. Understand that asking such a question places someone such as Elahi between a rock and a hard place. If he answers yes, he loses the whole audience and helps reveal the true face of believing Muslims. Yet he can't answer no, either. You see, he obviously runs in circles with very pious Muslims (and, of course, he has his "flock"), and to answer no would rob him of credibility with them. I'm guessing he'd be viewed as a traitor and a phony Muslim. This, not to mention that he himself no doubt believes Sharia should be preeminent (that he looks like an advertisement for medieval Arabia is a clue).

Every spokesman for Islam should be asked that question: Should Muslims in the U.S. have the choice to live under the Constitution or Sharia law? The answers — or dodges — will tell the tale.

November 30, 2016

Here's an interesting video in which black people debunk the notion that they couldn't obtain ID if it were necessary to vote. Ami Horowitz interviewed white liberals, who all parroted the nonsense that requiring voter ID was "racist" because it would suppress black turnout. He then interviewed black people, who were quite incredulous that anyone would be ignorant enough to believe they couldn't obtain ID or access the Internet to do so, which was also mentioned as something beyond many black Americans.

At least, that very well could be the conclusion of a Massachusetts college professor and her establishment-media allies.

At issue is a list of news sites compiled by Melissa Zimdars, an associate professor of communication and media at Merrimack College. Titling her selection “False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical ‘News’ Sources,” Zimdars says she wants to help people separate fact from fiction. Yet on her list of 100-plus outlets are legitimate conservative sites such as Breitbart, Red State, the Blaze, Project Veritas, and WorldNetDaily.

November 29, 2016

A team of researchers just proposed that alternate universes exist and influence each other, and this just may be true.

Because the media appear to exist in one of them and, unfortunately, influence our universe.

Just consider the latest media contortion. When President-elect Donald Trump claims he would have won the popular vote had it not been for illegal voting, he’s not only branded a loon and a liar, but the media also insist there’s no “documented proof” of widespead electoral fraud. When Hillary Clinton joins in the Jill Stein inspired recount in Wisconsin — even though her campaign and the Obama administration state there’s no evidence of vote tampering and that the effort won’t change the result — it’s called justifiable.

If you like your Castro, you can keep your Castro? Some may think this is Barack Obama’s attitude, given the president’s comments after Cuban dictator Fidel Castro’s death on Friday. In contrast, president-elect Donald Trump gave the tyrant the epitaph he deserved.

Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro’s legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights.

While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.

Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty. I join the many Cuban Americans who supported me so greatly in the presidential campaign, including the Brigade 2506 Veterans Association that endorsed me, with the hope of one day soon seeing a free Cuba.

For Obama’s part, he walked a line while speaking of a man who ever stepped over the line — and on his own people.

November 25, 2016

Here is an excellent little documentary on how Muslims, for centuries, abducted Europeans and sold them into slavery. It's only 14 minutes long, but it relates the basics of a largely forgotten aspect of history. Of course, slavery still exists in many Muslim lands today, rubber-stamped by the Muslim canon (Koran, Hadith and Sira), which labels non-Muslim fair game for all manner and form of exploitation.

November 23, 2016

“After Trump’s election: ‘There are two Americas now,’” reads the Washington Post headline. Interestingly, found elsewhere at the Post is the text of a 2004 DNC speech by then-vice-presidential nominee Senator John Edwards in which he stated that “we stilllive in a country where there are two different Americas” (emphasis added). So are “two Americas” something new or something old — or something seldom correctly told?

The Post writes of the apparent division in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory, citing a variety of perspectives. One man insisted the division was an illusion “manufactured” by the media but then, contradictorily, blamed Hillary Clinton’s deplorable “deplorables” rhetoric. Others, of course, put the onus on Trump, ignoring that it takes two to tango. If everyone agreed with the president-elect, there wouldn’t be division, would there? Yet the real point missed is that, with how our (dis)United States are now balkanized racially, ethnically, religiously, and ideologically, having just two Americas would be an improvement.

November 22, 2016

“They hear the shouts of the peasants from over the hill. All the knights and barons will be riding into the castle pulling up the drawbridge in a minute. All the peasants are coming with pitchforks!” said Pat Buchanan in Nashua, New Hampshire, while waging his insurgent 1992 campaign for the White House. Today, almost a quarter century after pugnacious Pat’s first presidential run, the castle walls have finally been breached by a peasant army that has made Donald Trump the 45th president of these United States.

Love him or hate him, fancy him snake-oil salesman or sincere, there is no question Trump has ridden the anti-establishment wave that in a generation has gone from ripple to tsunami. It’s also plain that he has said many of the correct things, inveighing illegal migration, raw-deal trade deals such as the TTP, internationalism, the media, and the rest of the establishment and its favored social code, political correctness. Lastly, there’s no doubt the establishment resolutely arrayed its forces against Trump, with even many members of his own party disavowing him.