> Do you have any svn/git plan in the very near future? I will have a
> couple fixes to push in the next days. So if you're going to switch to
> git soon, please let me know, I'll wait and commit later.
>
> Brice
>
>
>
> Le 04/06/2013 12:14, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
>> Ok. This is kinda what I assumed your response would be. :-)
>>
>> Let me talk to Dave Goodell later today, who just recently went through converting MPICH from SVN -> Git, and see what kinds of things we need to do to get the ball rolling here, and what kinds of dragons we should expect to encounter along the way.
>>
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.goglin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1000 !!!!!
>>> I already use git-svn for most of my hwloc work. But I still need svn for backports, and that wastes a lot of my time.
>>> Brice
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> a écrit :
>>> We're having a discussion (again :-) ) about moving OMPI to a DVCS.
>>>
>>> The short conclusion of the long conversation is: the OMPI dev community would be much more comfortable moving to a DVCS if they could see some success with other OMPI projects (e.g., hwloc and/or MTT).
>>>
>>> Would hwloc be interested in moving to git? This would mean:
>>>
>>> 1. converting the existing svn to git
>>> --> including all historical log messages that refer to "rXXXX"
>>> 2. converting the existing trac to git
>>> --> including all trac tickets, comments, and wiki pages that refer to "rXXXX"
>>>
>>> The OMPI devs -- who are mostly unfamiliar with git -- would like to see some close-to-home successes with git over a period of time that don't require heavy administrative maintenance over time (one of the pushback issues was that some organizations have hired full-time people to
>>> maintain/fix git repositories when they break/become unusable).
>>>
>>>
>>> Interested?
>>
>