Administrators update cell phone regulation policy

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

Send email to this addressEnter Your NameAdd a comment hereVerification

High school administrators enacted the updated cell phone policy to formally differentiate cell phones from “nuisance items”; however, stricter guidelines raise concern in some teachers over the potential banning of cell phones from the high school.

This fall, the high school implemented the first standardized phone policy, defining permissible cell phone use, while outlining the punishments for noncompliance. Yet despite the new policy’s implementation, many teachers and students saw no change in cell phone use.

The policy update was precipitated by the normalization of cell phone use. As the school website phone guidelines explained, “The overwhelming majority of our students use their cell phone in an appropriate and acceptable manner.”

One of the major purposes of the new policy is to provide clarity and consistency to phone regulation. Thelast formal policy did not differentiate cell phones from a range of “nuisance” items including e-cigarettes and stink bombs.

Senior Keyan Shayegan said, “Having a cell phone has made high school a lot easier just because it gives you so much more access to information.”

Quick access to the internet is a tool that has become inseparable from the success of many students. While students at the high school understand the need for cell phone regulation, many feel that cell phone use is a necessity in difficult classes.

Shayegan explained, “In high level classes, kids know not to mess around and can be trusted with phones.”

Creating a cell phone policy that allows for educational use of phones is task that has proven difficult for many schools. Since the release of the iPhone, schools have been conflicted between treating cell phones as an essential learning tool, and restricting there use, frequently leading them to being banned altogether.

As of this year, neither Stillwater Middle school, Oakland Middle School or Hudson High School allow for any use of cell phones during school hours.

Open cell phone use is an option that neither students nor teachers wish to lose.

“

I hope cell phone policy does not go to its extreme. Hudson High School does not allow cell phones out and I think that’s stupid because these are the modern devices. Cell phones are able to be devices to teach with.”

— Dennis Lindsay

Band teacher Dennis Lindsay said, “I hope cell phone policy does not go to its extreme. Hudson High School does not allow cell phones out and I think that’s stupid because these are the modern devices. Cell phones are able to be devices to teach with.”

Before this fall, the school relied on the BYOD, or Bring Your Own Device policy. In this policy, regulation of cell phones has fallen to the teachers rather than on administrators. Yet despite the policy change, the school has not seen any substantial change in cell phone use. However, some teachers are afraid of backlash that could follow attempts at further curtailing phone use.

For this reason, many at the high school suspect that if the current policy is escalated into an attempt to substantially limit cell phone use, it would only succeed in eliminating the productive phone use during class.

“If you tell people they can not have cell phones, it just makes the pocket texting more pervasive,” band teacher Joel Bryan explained.

During the time of the BYOD policy, many teachers were able to develop successful policies allowed students to continue using phones in class. These policies varied wildly from the virtually uncontrolled cell phone use in many AP classes, to policies employed in many other classes that allow for the educational use of cell phones.

The picture of the phone and the headline really dragged me in because it is very relatable. Throughout the article, I saw very clear and thorough explanations on the cell phone usage and what the interviewees thought on the topic. Also, the paragraphs transition very well from one to another. This is a very well written article, good work!

I thought this article was very good! It did a very good job of informing the reader without being too dry, even as a fairly information-heavy piece. I might branch out from only interviewing the band teachers though, only because the band room setting is quite different from that as compared to an English classroom for instance.

The topic is a very common topic with many students arguing the issue. Cell phones are very common in modern day life, it makes it easier for high school students to relate. Excellent interviews of using a credible teacher siding with the use of cell phones and showing both sides of the issue. It gave good information on the policy and the previous policy.

Very compelling article about a subject that plagues many schools. Headline draws people in well since it could be taken in either a good or bad way. Quotes provide plenty of background information and view, especially Keyan’s. Adds even further depth with the introduction of two staff members points of view.

The Pony Express intends for this area to be used to foster healthy thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to the standards of the Pony Express and to be respectful and constructive. Furthermore, we do not permit any of the following inappropriate content including: Libel or defamatory statements, any copyrighted, trademarked, or intellectual property of others, the use of profanity and foul language or personal attacks. All comments are reviewed and approved by staff to ensure that they meet the standards of this publication. The Pony Express does not allow anonymous comments. We require a name and valid email address submitted. This email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments. Online comments that are found in violation of these policies will be removed as quickly as possible.