- As I mentioned in the sign-up thread, I hesitated about putting in the vigilante role. I wasn't sure the numbers supported it. However, when 3 or 4 more players signed up, I decided to put it in. It's usually more harm to the village than good anyway. This time it played a significant role in favor of the village.

- The vig had to have an unused/saved bullet to take out the Alpha. relantel saved his bullet on Night 4, so it was bye-bye shafnutz. If relantel had had no bullet or if he had used his Night 4 bullet on someone else, then the shafnutz would have been OK. relantel died because there were remaining wolves. If there had only been the Alpha remaining, the vig would not have died.

- Before anyone asks: Yes, nan went completely absent. He set a standing order to protect himself.

Thanks again to everybody!

Last edited by redwill on Wed May 12, 2010 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

thehockeyguru wrote:I dont like that the Angel can protect themself each night. That gives the village such an advantage.

Yeah, I agree. But every other night is too little. Since I didn't want to get too creative for this simple game, I just went with the old rules. I'll do it differently next time.

The game ended up being very competitive with the setup the way it was. But when it comes down to the end, the village has 1 person that they know is good so it makes things really difficult for the Red's.

During the second to last vote we were hoping nan would hop on and vote for either mike or troy since the vote was split one each. Then the other of us would have switched to end it. We figured that was our only chance of winning.

MWB wrote:During the second to last vote we were hoping nan would hop on and vote for either mike or troy since the vote was split one each. Then the other of us would have switched to end it. We figured that was our only chance of winning.

Thats exactly right. The same thing happened with c2i and I . All we could hope was that the Angel would make an incorrect read and lynch one of his own.

This game, though simple, seemed to be more enjoyable, as it seemed that participation was up on the whole of it. But given the starting number, it was like we were starting on day 5 or 6 in a larger game, with porportionate numbers, but without any of the knowledge.

relantel wrote:This game, though simple, seemed to be more enjoyable, as it seemed that participation was up on the whole of it. But given the starting number, it was like we were starting on day 5 or 6 in a larger game, with porportionate numbers, but without any of the knowledge.