You can quantify Luskin’s Law by counting “Scare quotations”, with a direct correlation between the amount of scare quotations, and the amount of the Discovery Institute’s hate for the subject of Luskin’s post.

Please help develop this so that it is a more useful law. At first, I liked it because of the alliteration, and of course it makes a lot of sense, but then realized that “Luskin’s Law” could be improved, and added to.

On further review, to make it actually a law, I thought to throw it out to the crowd, whose ideas are much smarter and more scientific that Luskin could ever hope to be.

We could also consider:

Dembski’s Dilemma: Am I the smartest man in the world, or am I the smartest man ever?

Springer’s Principal: More Tard Is Better.

Springer’s Corollary: If you don’t understand it, ban it.

Springer’s Last Stand: The Banninator Button Is There To Be Used.

Discovery Institute’s Principal – None. This is a non sequitur.

O’Leary’s Law: Like, never let them know what you really mean when you write.

--------------Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08