Why does anyone need 20 in one pack? 20 is really harmful no one needs that many right?

Further - why should anyone be able to stockpile cartons of cigarettes knowing how harmful they are? Maybe if we limit purchases of one pack per week per person we can ward off excessive consumption of these harmful and dangerous products that serve no purpose useful to society and humans.

We also need background checks on those buying cigarettes since those already in bad health are contributing to the lack of fitness and rising health care costs in the society.

We also need a national database so we can know who is smoking and encourage those who do register to smoke to quit since it will be better for everyone.

Smoking kills tens of thousands a year and now is the time to stop the carnage.

People aren't responsible enough to know what's good for them. Big tobacco is killing innocent people.

ATF can use the same database for gun owners and instead of the NICS check we currently have for guns we can have a new call in for stores called the NICOTINE Check system for those buying cigs and some govt employee can look over that persons' health record and see if its ok if they buy cigarettes.

Why does anyone need 20 in one pack? 20 is really harmful no one needs that many right?

Further - why should anyone be able to stockpile cartons of cigarettes knowing how harmful they are? Maybe if we limit purchases of one pack per week per person we can ward off excessive consumption of these harmful and dangerous products that serve no purpose useful to society and humans.

We also need background checks on those buying cigarettes since those already in bad health are contributing to the lack of fitness and rising health care costs in the society.

We also need a national database so we can know who is smoking and encourage those who do register to smoke to quit since it will be better for everyone.

Smoking kills tens of thousands a year and now is the time to stop the carnage.

ATF can use the same database for gun owners and instead of the NICS check we currently have for guns we can have a new call in for stores called the NICOTINE Check system for those buying cigs and some govt employee can look over that persons' health record and see if its ok if they buy cigarettes.

Why does anyone need 20 in one pack? 20 is really harmful no one needs that many right?

Further - why should anyone be able to stockpile cartons of cigarettes knowing how harmful they are? Maybe if we limit purchases of one pack per week per person we can ward off excessive consumption of these harmful and dangerous products that serve no purpose useful to society and humans.

We also need background checks on those buying cigarettes since those already in bad health are contributing to the lack of fitness and rising health care costs in the society.

We also need a national database so we can know who is smoking and encourage those who do register to smoke to quit since it will be better for everyone.

Smoking kills tens of thousands a year and now is the time to stop the carnage.

• 74 percent of NRA members and 87 percent of non-NRA gun owners support requiring criminal background checks of anyone purchasing a gun.• 79 percent of NRA members and 80 percent of non-NRA gun owners support requiring gun retailers to perform background checks on all employees - a measure recently endorsed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry.

• 75 percent of NRA members believe concealed carry permits should only be granted to applicants who have not committed any violent misdemeanors, including assault.

• 74 percent of NRA members believe permits should only be granted to applicants who have completed gun safety training.

• 68 percent of NRA members believe permits should only be granted to applicants who do not have prior arrests for domestic violence.

• 63 percent of NRA members believe permits should only be granted to applicants 21 years of age or older.

• The NRA rank and file also supports barring people on terror watch lists from buying guns (71 percent) and believe the law should require gun owners to alert police to lost and stolen guns (64 percent). The NRA's Washington office strongly opposes both measures.

Smokers may not be able to afford ‘Obamacare’The Seattle Times / The Associated Press ^ | January 24, 2013 | Ricardo Alonzo-Zaldivar Posted on January 25, 2013 2:25:58 AM EST by 2ndDivisionVet

Millions of smokers could be priced out of health insurance because of tobacco penalties in President Obama’s health-care law, according to experts who are teasing out the potential impact of a little-noted provision in the massive legislation.

I'm surprised that many would be on board for the terror watch list. I don't know anybody who really knows how a name gets on there, how would you get your name off, etc. Linking to NS lists is foolish.

I'm surprised that many would be on board for the terror watch list. I don't know anybody who really knows how a name gets on there, how would you get your name off, etc. Linking to NS lists is foolish.

what's an NS list?

the link I provided was conducted by a Republican pollster of gun owners (both NRA members and non-NRA members)