Adaptation vs. Mitigation

* My partner and I negate. Resolved: When addressing global climate change, adaptation ought to be prioritized over mitigation. We provide the following observations for clarification in the round.

* -Observation 1: To prioritize something is to determine the order in which event should occur, ranked based on importance and timeframe.

* -Observation 2: Mitigation is the stabilization of greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.

* -Observation 3:

* The quality of life and life itself are prerequisites to all possible impacts in today's round; therefore, whichever side proves that they ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?Join Essayworld today to view this entire essayand over 50,000 other term papers

several centuries and that there is a good match between large-scale carbon dioxide sources and storage formations. In September 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published its Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, which found that technology can capture up to 90 percent of carbon dioxide in large-scale applications; and storage can account for up to 55 percent of the emissions reduction needed to achieve atmospheric stabilization. Essentially, Carbon Sequestration can provide an effective source of mitigation that can easily lead to huge changes. Dr. Ratan Lal, Director of the School of Environment and Natural Resources at The Ohio State University, furthers the soil sequestration is a truly win - win strategy. It restores degraded soils, enhances biomass production, purifies surface and ground waters, and reduces the rate of enrichment of atmospheric CO2 by offsetting emissions due to fossil fuel. Additionally, cheap, small scale efforts like ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.Write better papers. Get better grades.