After last night's episode it seems we are no closer to finding out "whodunnit" in series three of Broachurch.

While DIs Hardy and Miller seemed to have a break through - after discovering DNA on a sock used in the attack on Tirsh Winterman (Julie Hesmondalgh) - they failed to share their enlightening moment with us.

Still very much in the frame are Trish's boss, Ed Burnett (Lenny Henry), her best friend's husband Jim Atwood (Mark Bazeley) and local, creepy taxi driver Clive Lucas (Sebastian Armesto).

Who do you think is guilty of attacking Trish Winterman in Broadchurch?

0+ VOTES SO FAR

The top 10 suspects

Ed Burnett

Lenny Henry, as Ed Burnett, who has more memory on his phone than any one else in the world (Probably. 5,000 pictures is a lot)

He's obsessed with Trish and has a violent past, so it's not looking good for the farm shop owner.

Although in last night's episode he found a key piece of evidence and showed it to his daughter straight away.

Who for some reason, as a trained police officer, picked it up with her bare hands.

While Ed is certainly the boss no one wants (5,000 pictures of Trish!) he has been in the frame from the start and if the first season taught us anything we can be fairly certain he didn't do it.

Jim Atwood

Mark Nazeley as Jim Atwood, who has been suspect number one - on and off - throughout the series

Wife of Cath, local mechanic, and seducer of good looking waitreses. Just like Ed Burnett he has been an early contender for Broadchurch's newest most hated man.

But in last night's episode he talked about the previous victim of the sexual assault - which has been linked to the attack on Trish - in a way which would suggest he had no idea the woman whose Clio broke down had been raped. Or he's really stupid.

He does have that incriminating box of condoms, but Broadchurch is a small town, we doubt the local shop comes with a wide selection.

Ian Winterman

Ex-husband of Trish and amateur voyeur. Could Ian have done it?

Trish's husband is clearly an idiot. He had her computer fitted with spyware (enlisting the help of a former pupil) and last night suggested to her it was because he missed her. Oh, the romance.

He has clearly made the investigation more difficult for Hardy and Miller, throwing in a few red herrings, but does that mean he is guilty?

Read More

Rev. Paul Coates

While integral to the support of the Latimer family in seasons one and two, many fans have questioned why the reverend is still in the show.

While he has expressed frustration at how the town deserted him and the church as they moved on from the death of Danny Latimer - and this series has been as much about the Latimer family as it has Trish Winterman - it is hard to see how the reverend's story arc can be completed with just one more episode to go.

Either he has been the shock culprit all along, or he is about to have a half-baked ending to his time on Broadchurch with the fans didn't really need to see.

We know where we're putting our money.

Mark Latimer

Struggling to move on from the murder of Danny, Mark has struggled throughout the series, even making an attempt to end his own life.

While it seems unlikely he would be linked to the attack (Beth being Trish's support worker seems to have served as enough of a link between the two story lines) you really can rule no one out on Broadchurch.

Read More

Michael Lucas

Son of Clive and friend to Tom here is another teen who has been getting a kick out of watching and sharing adult material.

But as we saw in last night's episode he was also one of the teen's sharing personal pictures of DI Hardy's daughter Daisy, which means his understanding of privacy and consent leaves a lot to be desired.

He has not been in many episodes, but when every appearance he has had appears to be significant, from him explaining he knows Clive is not his real dad, to his resentment for his step dad and how he treats his mum.

Of course he would have been way too young at the time of the attack two years ago, to be wandering around a field, miles from home at 2am, which leads to our final suspcicion...

What if it's more than one of them?

We can't rule out more than one person being involved

Perhaps there are multiple suspects in it together, or the attacks are a copycat after one person confessed their crimes to another person?

Once you start looking at combinations of people, the list of suspects really is endless...