Share this Article

Author:

You may have seen the liberal elite bragging about their trips to Versy or Parie, or talking about their exotic bagets and crossonts. These are the liberals with PhDs in “literature” or electric cars, the liberals who wear wool hats and sip Starbucks while they read Kafka. They will try to talk to you about Salvador Daly or Arrested Development while they flaunt their veganism. These are the American versions of Frenchies, and the real ones are ever more horrifying. Both the American pseudo-Frenchies and the real ones are overwhelmingly homosexual, and they are out to get us.

Above is the demographics of sexuality among the French. As you can see, over two thirds of the population is a homogay, trying to lure you into playing backyard baguette bandit. The other major population in France is the whorelots, the women traversing everywhere in their lace lingerie and sky-high platform heels. These are the women flaunting their limp bodies in Playboy for the elderly perverts of the world, the women displaying their sin treats on the fashion runway and within the homosexual propaganda fashion magazines. Only 11 percent is Heterosexual, typically the pursuers of the whorelots or the few Reverends left in the hopeless nation.

French food is notoriously phallic. Everything is shaped like a sinwand in that country of nude heathens. It’s absolutely disgusting. When these liberals come to France, they are tempted by the long and slender penile objects they are placing in their mouth and the next thing they know, they are participating in a deranged orgy in the Louvre. When they return to America, they lure everyone else into their sodomite lifestyle, ruining the Christian America one orgy at a time. After all, why do you think our embarrassingly effeminate hat, Canada, is that way? Canada was founded by the Frenchies, and the lifestyle persisted with their fur capes of gaudiness and their language of sodomy.

France has a terrifying history. Look no further than the scariest and most dangerous era of all time, the 20s. France in the 1920s was experiencing a huge influx in their homosexual epidemic, because American homosexuals were fleeing to the land to have exotic coitus with a painter or a photographer with no knowledge of the Great American language. It was a vile lifestyle, a lifestyle of hatred and fear for True American Lifestyles.You had American homosexuals such as Cole Porter, Gertrude Stein, F. Scott Fritzgerald, Picasso, Man Ray among other less famous pursuers of bladder tickling or clam dabbling by the gigolos roming the clubs and streets, waiting for naive artistes looking for sin to excite their lives, unaware of the horrors awaiting.

In 1800, a terrifyingly growth-stunted dictator named Napoleon conquered France. Napoleon was a homosexual, his slender body adorned in furs and fastidiously groomed jackets of the typical homosexual artistic finesse. He sindocked his way to the top, destroying any remnant of Heterosexuality possibly alive in the Frenchies, whom he now had sinister control over. Napoleon was their Stan, ruling over a fiery, limp-wristed dynasty of sexual favors for the sinfaeries in charge. This was how France got it’s homosexual start, and ever since, the Frenchies have been dressing like Dear Leader Napoleon and paying their tribute to him in their homsexuality, in exchange for their souls.

The two pictures above are images of the typical Frenchies you’ll encounter. You have the effeminate ones with their sex slaves, and the performance driven, minimalist, Gary Numan-inspired Frenchies, the Frenchies who’d rather be silent while you penetrate them as they let their body do the talking. It truly is terrifying, which is why I advise all of you to stay out. And if you see anyone dressed as any of the above Frenchies, run and hide. They want your backside, and will go to any extent to brainwash you into a lifestyle of sodomy, self-hatred and evil beyond your wildest dreams. The French are a menacing people, a people of monstrous means and mind control, a people driven by everything bad in life. Honor your Heterosexuality, and treasure it. Any possible French threats to it could take over if you have any less than Complete Faith in Jesus.

About The AuthorRepublican, American, Christian, Man, Carnivore, White, Hero, Genius, Brave. All words that adequately describe Christopher Christenson. At the ripe young age of 28, Christopher has been writing for Christwire for quite a while, when he isn't warding off the North Koreans from attacking or mentoring youth at his church. Because of his young age, he is able to connect with the young people whilst still charming our beloved elderly. Christopher is fascinated by the grotesque trends among youth and will stop at nothing to investigate. You can contact him on his website.

We post the Truth. Provide evidence of this “falseness” you suggest. Perhaps you’ve been watching too much CNN or MSNBC. That can implant a terrible liberal bias and will keep you brainwashed in the filthy medicine of liberalism instead of clear and in the sun, with a full view of the Christian Morality that rings true throughout all life and time.

For starters, Napoleon was not Homosexual. What you said about France is wrong. Most people there are actually heterosexual. The graph was made up on the spot. And I do not watch CNN or whatever that other one is.

Napoleon was a homogay. Think he’s not? Explain the stature, the clothing. Most people in France are indeed homosexuals. It is a country of homosexuality, a modern day Sodom. The graph was made by intelligent scientists of Christian Law, engineers of Morality and Truth. And from somewhere you must have gotten your liberal bias.

It’s the way they dress you based someone’s sexuality? How much wrong can you be? And if France has so many homosexuals then why are there so many people there? The population in that country is large. If anything, America is a country of homosexuality and you are an example of it.

I got my liberal bias from thought. The clothing Napoleon wore was common at the time. It’s like the parade uniforms used by the military. The graph was made by a 20 year old who can’t write well with microsoft excel. The numbers, except the homosexual percentage, were made up without data to back them up. Prove me wrong.

The French army isn’t very much, but that’s only because they have to get the toughest recruits into the riot police. Civil disobedience is almost an unofficial coming of age to the French, and it keeps their responsibilities fairly low compared to the rest of the first world countries. The French know what’s up.

The French persona has always perplexed me. At times, they are genuinely forward-looking. For example, they work very hard to preserve their language from foreign threats and words. There is a genuine national spirit there. They also know that Muslims present a cultural hatred toward European traditions so they try to ban the building of mosques and women wearing those towels. It a wonderful thing to do for women’s rights and send a great message about Islamic cultural imperialism… Yet on the other hand they have strayed so far from their Christian roots, they are notoriously socialist and this encourages a vast amount of sexual pervsersion, including homosexuality… I really don’t know what to make of a country so mixed up. They were once a great ally of the US but lately they harbor such resentment towards us.

How exactly a political system such as socialism encourage a vast amount of sexual perversion ? And do you realize that whatever the party’s beliefs are they are called to rule a world based on capitalism.Therefore its basicly the same thing but each party represents different interests of different companies

What resentment? France and Britain are the ones who are constantly at odds with one another, not the US and France. Politically, they’re the same and realize that a threat of massive scale to one is a threat to the other, hence why they were allies in both world wars.

Look, I’m about to make history. A Brit defending the French. Who knows this website might be good for something besides an occasional rant after all. It may in fact bring the world together in a fight against xenophobic, homophobic racist bigotry.

Firstly, stop with the “Frenchies”. It makes you seem like a four year old extremely dim child. The French are not known for being horrifying at all. Someone’s a little scared of anyone who doesn’t fit their narrow world view.

Your pie chart is clearly something YOU threw together in five seconds. I am surprised you decided to say that there is as much as 11% heterosexuality in France. I thought you’d say a percentage much closer to 0. If you actually found that obviously faked data somewhere provide a link to the source material.

Whorelot is not a sexuality. A whore is a derogatory term for some woman who either gets paid for sex, has a lot of sex or looks like a prostitute or someone who has a lot of sex. That is not a sexual preference. As you seem to struggle understanding what sexualities there are I shall describe them.

Homosexual – A person who is sexually attracted to members of the same sex

Heterosexual – A person who is sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex

Bisexual – A person who is sexually attracted to members of both sexes

Asexual – A person who is sexually attracted to members of neither sex.

There you go 4 sexual preferences exist: same, opposite, both or none. Any of the others claimed to exist by the people on this site are false. They are ways of describing the type of person that someone USUALLY goes for in an ideal world. Not a sexuality more of a type.

Well done for finding a picture of a baguette and assuming, wrongly that all French food is phallic. It is no more phallic than any other nation’s food look at America’s fondness for the hot dog for example. That is just as phallic. And food leading to orgies in art galleries? Really? NO FOOD WILL INSPIRE ORGIES TO BREAK OUT. Art Galleries are not places for orgies they are places to look at art. Between you and me the clue is in the name.

Canada was settled by both the French and the British. That is why the country is bilingual. The fur? Worn to ensure protection from harsh conditions rather than fashion. Language of sodomy? Not at all. You’d be surprised how many English words have French origins so if French is the language of sodomy so is English.

Every country has a dark history, not just France. The 1920′s the most scariest and dangerous historical period of all time? Doubtful. Even if you take the scariest and most dangerous to have homophobic undertones this is not true. There are historical periods where homosexuality was not only accepted it was considered a rite of passage.

Cole Porter was Married to Linda Lee Thomas. So not homosexual. Yes Gertrude Stein was a lesbian but doesn’t matter at all. F. Scott Fitzgerald was married to his WIFE Zelda, again not gay. Picasso was Spanish not American and a notorious womaniser not correct on either count there. Man Ray was married to Juliet Browner and not gay. Wow, you only managed to get one correct.

Napoleon was heterosexual. He was married to Joséphine de Beauharnais and had Pauline Bellisle as a mistress. Both are female. He got to the top by being a great leader rather than doing sexual favours for homosexuals. He wore the fashion at the time like most of the world or a uniform. It was more of a global fashion thing.

The first photo is a still from the British comedy Blackadder. It is from the third series. It is set in late 18th early 19th century BRITAIN. Nothing to do with France. The clothing being worn was the fashion at the time and has nothing to do with homosexuality. In fact Homosexuality was illegal until 1967. The second is a photo of a mime. It is a street performer. It has nothing to do with homosexuality.

No nation is out to rape you. Homosexuals do not see any man and instantly want to have sex with them. No one is trying to brain wash people. Mind control doesn’t actually exist. The French are not a menacing people. They are not driven by evil impulses. There is nothing wrong with the French. You xenophobic homophobic bigot.

Too many words there, but I could see instantly that you are wrong, so I stopped at the third sentence. You really should try to edit down and get to your point.

Fact: The USA had no practicing homosexuals until the invasion of Normandy, when we rescued the French and they paid our recruits back in lavish oral sex parties, which then brought AID’s and evolutionism to Christ’s country.

Fact: Homosexuals also have their annual (anal?) Gay Agenda Conference in Paris each year to determine how to destroy the White American family and recruit our boys, some as young as 6, to work in their gay bath houses.

Fact: France supports Shariah law and tries to thwart American protection of freedom every chance they get. Remember how they acted after 9-11? Remember how they tried to stop Bush from liberating our oil in Iraq?

“Above is the demographics of sexuality among the French. As you can see, over two thirds of the population is a homogay, trying to lure you into playing backyard baguette bandit.”

Excuse me ? Can you link some trustworthy source ? I mean, if you guys are professional journalists, you must have some sources, right ? You know, reliable, solid sources. Could you please show us where do those numbers come from ?

“The two pictures above are images of the typical Frenchies you’ll encounter.”

What ? Since 1970, American products or brands are common sights in Europe. We dress just like the average American.

The first picture represent how French “Nobles” used to dress in the 1700s.

And I don’t even know what the second picture represents.

“Any possible French threats to it could take over if you have any less than Complete Faith in Jesus.”

I’m sorry but what kind of threat are we responsible of ? I mean, it’s not like we’re invading the world or anything. Actually, the two countries that are invading the world are the US and China.

The USA are invading pretty much everyone since WWII. Vietnam, Irak, Koweit, Afghanistan, they have troops and military bases scattered around the world.

China is invading the world with it’s products and influence. We are all using Made-In-China products.

And by the way, what does that means :

“it could take over if you have any less than Complete Faith in Jesus.”

Did you mean “It could take over if you don’t blindly follow this religion and its beliefs” ?

The whole logic could be explained by the simple fact that you, the writer of this article, think that it’s perfectly fine to blindly (and without any questionings) believe in something. However, I would really like to know how France is threatening the US.
And before you answer, please keep in mind that I said “The US”. I actually meant, “The average US citizen”, not the “journalists” of Christwire.

Now, it is time for me to answer some of the commentors.

Christopher Christenson :

“We post the Truth. Provide evidence of this “falseness” you suggest.”

Every regular media out there have reliable sources. A professional journalist usually put a link to his sources at the bottom of his article. Could you please tell us who provided this chart ?

And don’t tell me a Christian scientist provided the chart. Science : systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.

There is no such thing as a Christian Scientist. I mean, a Scientist can believe whatever he wants to believe, but you simply can’t be called a scientist if you are an expert on God’s words. Those words don’t belong to the “physical or material” part of this planet.

Another thing. Charts providers are trustworthy peoples. Read : Non-biased peoples. If you ask some random black dude in the street to draw a chart about how criminality and skin color. He’ll probably tell you that there is no relation, that black peoples and white peoples are equal when it comes to crimes.

If you want a reliable and solid chart, you might want to ask a true company. I don’t know any US statistic companies, so I’ll just tell you to check this one out : http://www.insee.fr/fr/

This, is a reliable and professional statistics-providing company.

Stephenson Billings :

“Yet on the other hand they have strayed so far from their Christian roots”

Our Christian roots are just fine. The Christian society did bring good things to the world, I have to agree on that. But please. We’re in the 21st century. The Bible was once a reliable document. But now that we evolved in this very scientific and facts-based world…

Jesus’ teaching is quite something. I do believe in Jesus existence, even if I don’t believe in God. I do believe, that someone named Jesus taught things and moral. And I do think that a lot of those things are true and should be respected. You shall not kill, help the ones who are in need of help, those things are good and the world would be better if we all follow these rules.

But Christianity should definitely evolve in something else. It should keep its good things like moral and regular rules but please, bring a new Christian religion. A modern religion.

“they are notoriously socialist and this encourages a vast amount of sexual pervsersion, including homosexuality…”

Did you imply that socialism and sexual perversion are related ? Can you please explain it ? With facts and sources ?

“They were once a great ally of the US but lately they harbor such resentment towards us.”

We decided (Our president decided after a referendum) not to participate in the second Irak war. The whole “There are mass-destruction devices in Irak” was a mistake, as not even one of those supposedly atomic bombs have been discovered. The US spent countless billions and thousands of soldiers lives in order to…pacify Irak, I guess ? It worked perfectly right ? Saddam Hussein is dead, the whole country is messed up.

A Dictatorship isn’t always bad. There are strict rules, freedom is limited to whatever pleases the dictator. This, isn’t really a perfect life. But you could study, you could live, drink, eat, you had electricity, gasoline, education, you had hospitals.

Now that the US army killed the dictator, the whole country is in a civil war-like situation. Suicide bombers, regular terrorists, armed groups…

Is that a success ? No. I’m glad France didn’t send troops in Irak.

Albert Toppers :

“France was my second choice for the country we should nuke to save the world. Fantastic article!”

How can you save the world by killing 63M peoples ?

Why does the world needs to be saved ?

From what does the world needs to be saved ?

I’ll anticipate your “From Satan” answer by another question :

If we don’t believe in the Christian religion, that means we also don’t believe in Satan. If we don’t believe in Satan’s existence, how can we be afraid of it ? And why would you force someone to be saved ? From something that doesn’t even exist for that same person you want to save ?

“Fact: The USA had no practicing homosexuals until the invasion of Normandy, when we rescued the French and they paid our recruits back in lavish oral sex parties, which then brought AID’s and evolutionism to Christ’s country. ”

The homosexual thing started to be noticeable in the late 1980s. There was no homosexual statistics before that date. Which means, there could have been homosexual peoples in the US long before the invasion of Normandy.

“Fact: Homosexuals also have their annual (anal?) Gay Agenda Conference in Paris each year to determine how to destroy the White American family and recruit our boys, some as young as 6, to work in their gay bath houses. ”

Do you really think the gays are some sort of gang with a specific plan, specifically engineered in order to destroy the white American family ? Can’t you just accept that those peoples are just enjoying something that you don’t find enjoyable ?

What do you mean “Recruit our boys” ? Do you really think the gays are trying to take over the world ? If so, please keep your feets on the ground. There is no such conspiracies.

“Remember how they tried to stop Bush from liberating our oil in Iraq?”

Wow wow wow. We didn’t try to stop Bush from doing anything. We just didn’t want to participate in this useless war.

And another thing. Why is Iraq’s oil “your oil” ? And why did you need to liberate it ?

But I guess that now that “your oil” is free, American companies are in charge of those oil sources, right ? Isn’t that what Jesus (and everyone else) would call “Stealing something from someone” ?

Answer those questions by explaining things and by bringing facts/proofs, like every journalist would

Don’t pick on my grammar or my general knowledge of the English language, I’m not a native English speaker.

If France really wanted to show the USofA that you were thankful that we liberated you and that keep the world safe, you would send us another awesome gift like the Statue of Liberty, but we give you guys everything and get nothing back in return. Get back to giant American statue making, and we’ll be cool.

The US and more generally the allies did send troops through the overlord operation. But what about the true goal ?

I will be honest and tell you that I believe that the true goal of this operation was to peacefully counter the Soviet counter-attack.

A soviet-dominated Europe would have been a massive disaster for the US.

Check what happened during the Cold War. The Soviet Union and the Sovietish China vs The US and Europe. That’s a balanced fight, right ? What about The Soviet Union, the Sovietish China AND The Soviet Europe vs the US ? That would have been a disaster.

In a certain way, the US did liberate us from the Third Reich. But I still think they wanted not to let the soviets take all the German engineers and scientists and I believe that was their main goal.

And I’m not even talking about how liberating Europe is a very good economical and political decision. At first, it seems costly and not really needed as the Soviet Army is already crushing the 1st, the 4th PanzerArmy and the SS PanzerCorp on the Eastern front (Those were the spearhead of the Wehrmacht). But in the end, it’s a part of what made the US the way it currently is.

So You stopped after I said this site might be good for something besides a rant and decided in those three sentences I was wrong? There is not a single thing incorrect in those sentences.

Sentence one I said I about to make history. It was a joke that involved sentence two. Us Brits and the French are not known for being best of friends. That’s a fact.

Sentence two I said I was a Brit (fact) who was defending the French (fact). Again no lies.

Sentence three was another joke. This one concerned the purpose of this site. You had to read the forth sentence to truly understand it. I basically joked that if this site could bring people together by supplying them with a mutual enemy it might actually be good for something.

Now taking on board your comment about the length. Really? 755 words to long I shall counter your “Facts” in as few words as possible.

“Fact” 1: This is lie. Nothing said is true. Where’s your proof?

“Fact” 2: Lie. Difference between paedophile and homosexual. No such meeting takes place.

“Fact” 3: Another lie. France only refused to fight in Iraq. Didn’t support the opposing side. Just didn’t get involved.

They killed my grandmother and my uncle. Yet, I ( An Algerian) Would stand up for france and say that you are all idiots. Why must you be against muslims, homosexuals, cats? I am a muslim who supports homosexuals and has a cat! I Hate france with passion. But do you know what I hate even more? Arrogant Bastards.