Much like Lady Gaga, I often feel like Scarlett Johansson over-saturates the market whenever she has a new project. Scar is appearing (in a supporting role) in the new Cameron Crowe film, We Bought a Zoo. It doesn’t look like any kind of ground-breaking, award-potential film, and Scarlett’s performance looks pretty basic-to-horrible, judging solely from the trailer. So how is a supporting role in a non-blockbuster, not-acclaimed film somehow allowing Scarlett to take the covers of Vanity Fair, Interview and now Cosmopolitan, all within a few months? I don’t know. I don’t think Scarlett is that important, honestly. I don’t hate the girl, I just don’t think she’s all that talented or worth all of this fuss.

Anyway, Cosmo just released their cover of Scarlett, although this is a really weird image that I would not have selected for a cover. That’s not her body, correct? They, like, stuck Scarlett’s head on Minka Kelly’s body, I think. The dress is bad, the hair isn’t great, and the whole endeavor looks like a successful Photoshop project. Cosmo also released a quote from their cover interview:

“I’m attracted to the quality of being adventurous and perhaps a bit mischievous and also questioning authority and being proactive. If that makes up a quintessential bad boy, then whatever. I’m not at all attracted to meanness or bullying, but I do think conviction is attractive. I mean, really, who doesn’t?” – Scarlett Johansson in the January issue of Cosmo

Scarlett is just describing Sean Penn, correct? Do you think she’s still hung up on Penn’s jock? I think she might be. One of the blind items that I’ve always believed was Scarlett was that one about a young actress who thought boning Oscar winners would make her more talented and award-worthy. Allegedly, Scarlett is currently boning Joseph Gordon Levitt, but I don’t know if it’s serious or anything. If she’s serious about boning Oscar winners, I’d like to see her with Adrien Brody next. They would make an interesting pair.

how do I get on the cover then because I would love to be slimmified, tweaked and airbrushed! I turn 50 next year and my ego needs the boost of seeing a great looking fake me – this s**t is wasted on someone as young as ScarJo!

That doesn’t even look like her face, let alone her body. It’s like they puffed up her face and trimmed down her body. Looks more like a Beginner Photoshop project to me. And I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: this chick would never have even gotten an acting job as a kid if it weren’t for her husky voice. Without that she is completely forgettable and bland.

please just like every other magazine cover out there she’s photoshopped. do you know how easy it is to cut out and reshape something against a white back drop? I could look like that too in a matter of minutes.

Whatever. I still say the girl looks like she’s having an allergic reaction to something. Her nose is too big for her face, her cheeks are too big, her lips are too big. Her eyes aren’t big enough given every other feature. All I can think of when I see her, especially if she’s smiling, is that I want to give her a tissue because she looks like she’s going to need to blow her nose at any moment. Maybe it’s just me. I don’t dislike her. I just cannot seem to look at her without thinking she’s “stuffy” or needs some Nyquil. (And her so-called husky voice doesn’t help either. If she could be typecast at this point it would be as a congestion-relieving product commercial actress.)

Give me the cosmo covers of the 70s/80s tacky sexy gaudy but at least interesting to look at not the celeb of the moment. BTW, given scarjo’s political pretensions, nothing says serious political intellectual than a photoshopped cosmo cover.

Uhh… right. Didn’t she mean girl a woman in the ladies room per a Lainey blind that was later revealed: “She was in the ladies’ room recently at a private event, a private no-fans non-civilian event, standing next to an industry type at the counter. The other woman complimented her on her appearance, something to effect of: that’s a great dress, it looks amazing on you … And her answer? Hear this with a sneer: ‘Is this the moment when I’m supposed to tell you that you look good too?’
And walked away.”

My take on her lately is that she’s had so many set backs and failures (brought on by her own stupidity) that she’s leaving little slam-Ryan crumbs. He has been nothing but generous post divorce, so she better cool it.

This girl is so heinous it amazes me. She looked disgusting in Iron man. Only in the cropped ads of Dolce does she look decent. Yet this country complains about Kim Kardashian…who is stunning. ScarJo=piglet

Bad actress, “full of it” interviews, overexposed in general… ScarJo’s star is going down faster than this beer I’m drinking. She has been eclisped by all the “newcomers” (Laurence, Mulligan, Stone et al.)

I have no particular love/hate for her but she really does resemble a piglet. I have struggled and completely fail to find her attractive in any way. And then there is the terrible acting, poor taste in men…. Go away Scarlett and take some acting lessons.

There is no way that is her body! I think that she has a beautiful, curvy figure, and that body is DEFINITELY not it! What happened to her boobs, waist, and butt?? Not only that, but like everyone else said, this is a lazy picture. They totally could have done her hair better, she has beautiful hair. And the dress, ugh. This is the best they could do??