For the ppast 3 years there has been news about the poverty and rising food prices in what is now called Egypt,
fro the past 3 years we have seen Hugo Chavez create liasons with Qaddaffi,
have heard that he provides each citizen with 20 thousand US from the residuals from the nationalized oil, and has ppolitley kept his mouth shut about the Taliban and Hezbolah, and anything esle they say are terrorists

Now all of a sundde the people in Lybia are upset, becuase.. becuase ... becuase...hey why not every one else is upset??

what is realy going on here? they have been trying to put a weaposn of mass destruction on this guy for years to go in and take is oil long before they did that in Iraq

so realy what is behind all of this and what could be the real motive?

Is he a Mubarack, a man who has been a stooge for zionist interests?

or a Mossadeq, a popularly lected president of Iran who made the grave insult to the global corporatocrcy of

At the time, Iran's oil was Britain's single largest overseas investment.
[4] Popular discontent with the AIOC began in the late 1940s, a large segment of Iran's public and a number of politicians saw the company as exploitative and a vestige of British imperialism.[5]
Despite Mosaddegh's popular support, Britain was unwilling to negotiate its single most valuable foreign asset, and instigated a worldwide boycott of Iranian oil to pressure Iran economically.[6]
Initially, Britain mobilized its military to seize control of the Abadan oil refinery, the world's largest, but Prime Minister Clement Attlee opted instead to tighten the economic boycott[7] while using Iranian agents to undermine Mosaddegh's government.[8] With a change to more
conservative governments in both Britain and the United States, Churchill and the U.S. administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower decided to overthrow Iran's government though the predecessor U.S. Truman administration had opposed a coup.[9]

The Central Intelligence Agency pressured the weak monarch while bribing street thugs, clergy, politicians and Iranian army officers to take part in a
propaganda campaign against Mosaddegh and his government.[10] At first, the coup appeared to be a failure when on the night of August 15–16, Imperial Guard Colonel Nematollah Nassiri was arrested while attempting to arrest Mosaddegh. The Shah fled the country the next day. On August 19, a pro-Shah mob,
paid by the CIA, marched on Mosaddegh's residence.[11] According to the CIA's declassified documents and records, some of the most feared mobsters in Tehran were hired by the CIA to stage pro-Shah riots on the 19th. Other CIA-paid men were brought into Tehran in buses and trucks, and took over the streets of the city.[12] Mosaddegh was arrested, tried and convicted

U.S. Deploys Naval, Air Forces Near Libya The Libyan regime is facing growing international isolation. The U.S. has deployed naval and air forces closer to Libya in a move that would shore up a no-fly zone over its borders. The U.S. and France have also pledged to aid to the opposition-controlled east, and taken steps to freeze billions in Libyan regime assets abroad. Speaking before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called for Gaddafi’s immediate departure.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: "It is time for Gaddafi to go. Now. Without further violence or delay. The international community is speaking with one voice and our message is unmistakable. These violations of universal rights are unacceptable and will not be tolerated."http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/1/headlines#2

Wait a minute didnt we hear both Bush senior and Bush junior say the exact same phrase about Saddam Hussein????

CRAWFORD, Texas (CNN) -- President Saddam Hussein's days as leader of Iraq are numbered if the United States has anything to do with it, President Bush made clear Saturday during a joint news conference with visiting Prime Minister Tony Blair of Great Britain.

"I told the prime minister the policy of my government is to remove Saddam and that all options are on the table," he said.

Washington, March 4 (RHC)-- U.S. President Barack Obama has publicly said for the first time that Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi must leave office. During a news conference Thursday, Obama said he has ordered the U.S. military to be prepared to take action in Libya if needed.

It's always about the money, whether it be oil money or any other commodity. What I always wonder about is the peoples' position, and what kind of clout they can garner through collective efforts.

The inherent weakness of capitalism lies in that it must grow and continue to grow. If growth stops, it implodes in on itself. Therefore, power lies in the ability of the people to control the market through collective resistance. It's a numbers game, the peoples' power is limited only through their inability to work together in a unified manner.

What I hear is that in Egypt, when all of this popped off, Mubarak had the Coptic Church of Alexandria bombed using terrorist tactics in order to garner international and local support, by blaming the Arabs and Muslim Brotherhood for the attack. Instead, the people were wise to the game, and the Copts and Muslims allied together to resist the entrenched power structure - Mubarak is a puppet. Qaddafi is too. My question is always - What will the people do, collectively? Will they own their power? Can they unite against their tyrannical dictatorship and puppet regime, or will they be played against one another, like instruments of death in a song of Set/Sobek?

It's always about the money, whether it be oil money or any other commodity. What I always wonder about is the peoples' position, and what kind of clout they can garner through collective efforts.

The inherent weakness of capitalism lies in that it must grow and continue to grow. If growth stops, it implodes in on itself. Therefore, power lies in the ability of the people to control the market through collective resistance. It's a numbers game, the peoples' power is limited only through their inability to work together in a unified manner.

What I hear is that in Egypt, when all of this popped off, Mubarak had the Coptic Church of Alexandria bombed using terrorist tactics in order to garner international and local support, by blaming the Arabs and Muslim Brotherhood for the attack. Instead, the people were wise to the game, and the Copts and Muslims allied together to resist the entrenched power structure - Mubarak is a puppet. Qaddafi is too. My question is always - What will the people do, collectively? Will they own their power? Can they unite against their tyrannical dictatorship and puppet regime, or will they be played against one another, like instruments of death in a song of Set/Sobek?

Interesting times, indeed.

Click to expand...

Gaddhaffi is a puppet to who?

you got to explain that one

I have read the "Green book"

I doubt Hugo Chavez would be working with a puppet

and corporate globalist white supremists in history , as expalained in this post,

ate those who refuse to be puppets,
by nationalizing their natural resources

Editor’s note: Kadafi attempts to preempt the globalist scheme by ceasing all military action and declaring it will start talks with rebels.

The Pentagon has deferred to France, Britain, and a handful of corrupt Arab oil sheikdoms following a unanimous vote at the United Nations to bomb Libya. The world’s premier war-making outfit will allow the Europeans and the Arabs take the lead in killing Libyans.

The United States “has been largely mum on what its role will be in the attacks, and while they have deployed some additional ships and aircrafts to the region it is unclear exactly how far they will go in attacking targets within Libya,” writes Jason Ditz.