Fallout 76 Nukes Lore and Releases

He has become the lore-guru on /r/Fallout, writing long-winded posts about how the lore of the new games is absolutely flawless and in sync with the older games.

Click to expand...

To make matters worse, a lot of people are eating his shit up instead of looking for the lore themselves and think for themselves. And then when you have arguments with Bethestards (bad idea but it happens) people think the lore in the new games is great because of his walls of text are filled with a lot bullshit justifications and self-interpreted crap.

To make matters worse, a lot of people are eating his shit up instead of looking for the lore themselves and think for themselves. And then when you have arguments with Bethestards (bad idea but it happens) people think the lore in the new games is great because of his walls of text are filled with a lot bullshit justifications and self-interpreted crap.

Click to expand...

It's not like he's wrong, though. But having to overanalyze and add tons of headcanon so your world makes sense is just lazy, shitty writing.

I read some of his stuff and it had a lot of self-interpreted stuff, meaning there were no actual ingame sources to validate the claims he makes. So while he's not completely wrong, he's wrong about a lot of stuff because of lack of actual evidence.

I read that he actually tried to edit some wiki to put his headcannons but they were reverted due to lack of evidence.

It's not like he's wrong, though. But having to overanalyze and add tons of headcanon so your world makes sense is just lazy, shitty writing.

Click to expand...

That is the thing. These shyster fucks know well enough to use vague lore in key areas to make nerds geek out over future possibilities. 6 DLC are planned. The fucking engine is easily hacked, and unencrypted data is sent through plain word files. DDOS attacks are highly likely.

Hay-soos, Fallout 76 is getting eviscerated with the user reviews, granted most of it is early review bombing but I don't think I've seen a Bethesda game with this amount of negative fuzz around it on the mainstream.

I read some of his stuff and it had a lot of self-interpreted stuff, meaning there were no actual ingame sources to validate the claims he makes. So while he's not completely wrong, he's wrong about a lot of stuff because of lack of actual evidence.

I read that he actually tried to edit some wiki to put his headcannons but they were reverted due to lack of evidence.

Of course not. It's some sort of mythical bat-beast that requires a sonic gun with a special frequency setting to bring down to the ground, and when slain it gives you nice loot like batskin and batbones that can be used to make the highest tier armor. Totally not dragons at all.

To make matters worse, a lot of people are eating his shit up instead of looking for the lore themselves and think for themselves. And then when you have arguments with Bethestards (bad idea but it happens) people think the lore in the new games is great because of his walls of text are filled with a lot bullshit justifications and self-interpreted crap.