On 8/5/06, Anil Philip <goodnewsforyou@yahoo.com> wrote:
> You mentioned "It's not as sophisticated as proguard
> that does even remove dead code inside classes."
> However Proguard leaves libraries alone. Does your
> minijar operate on libraries? eg. commons-net-1.4.jar
> Or would I have to build the jar from the original
> source?
Not sure what you mean by "However Proguard leaves libraries alone"
...but minijar does work on the jar - no need for the sources. It does
remove unused classes but not methods like proguard does. I personally
found the gain of removing methods too small to justify the effort.
(did a few comparisons)
HTH
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org