Yes, there is mental illness here in droves. First of Bonham: the reporter is championed by Fox news and other ill ultra right wing factions. How silly do you have to be to think this is all of the story? The possibilities are endless to the real story. Perhaps the r and D aide had been called in by Larry Craig, the former bathroom boy and republican senator from Idaho who propositioned the undercover agent for sex in the minneapolis airport bathroom and things were terminated so the republican party wouldn't be a continued embarrassment.. Too bad Paul Harvey isn't around so we could hear the rest of the story. Zoggy-I suggest you get your nose to the turf and get the real uncut story.

Tolerance is not a virtue, it's a lack of principles associated with any given social perversion. Those who want to establish a social norm for morals often have little or non themselves. The democrat party will continue to have a larger and larger tent as long as we keep getting more and more willing to rob the working stiff along with more and more perverts.

Fish, click on the link and there is indeed a couple of opportunities to learn a it more.

Do you ever get tired of making excuses for the liberal ideology?

As you seem unable to substantiate your claims regarding global warming despite your condescending assumption of superior intellect, perhaps you can move on to something such as explaining to us less fortunate in the intellect dept. how this health care debacle is good for this nation.

I found the following on the web, it really puts my Dad's generation into perspective.

"During the 3-1/2 years of World War 2 that started with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in December 1941 and ended with the Surrender of Germany and Japan in 1945, the U.S. produced; 22 aircraft carriers, 8 battleships, 48 cruisers, 349 destroyers, 420 destroyer escorts, 203 submarines, 34 million tons of merchant ships, 100,000 fighter aircraft, 98,000 bombers, 24,000 transport aircraft, 58,000 training aircraft, 93,000 tanks, 257,000 artillery pieces, 105,000 mortars, 3,000,000 machine guns, and 2,500,000 military trucks.

We put 16.1 million men in uniform in the various armed services, invaded Africa, invaded Sicily and Italy, won the battle for the Atlantic, planned and executed D-Day, marched across the Pacific and Europe, developed the atomic bomb and ultimately conquered Japan and Germany.

It's worth noting, that during the almost exact amount of time, the Obama administration couldn't build a functioning web site."

When he was fired, he was only told that Democrat leadership was uncomfortable with him befriending a Republican

Working as an aide was Drum’s first job after graduating

To read more click on the link

This doesn'et suprise me in the least. Liberalism is truly a mental illness. Not so much for the people benefitting from it like the jobless, welfare recipients, lazy, illegal immigrants. I can see why they support a nanny state, but the people that have me scratching my head are the people that are out there making a living on their own, people with small buisnesses, people that are actually working for their money. Why they would ever support this clown makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.

I can see why they support a nanny state, but the people that have me scratching my head are the people that are out there making a living on their own, people with small buisnesses, people that are actually working for their money. Why they would ever support this clown makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.

Because they want support from those who will accept anything. They don't want to be scolded for bending six year old little Bobby over the log. I'm sure you think I am joking, but look up NAMBLA. I think for at least a year or two I can still get away with not tolerating pedophile behavior.

I can see why they support a nanny state, but the people that have me scratching my head are the people that are out there making a living on their own, people with small buisnesses, people that are actually working for their money. Why they would ever support this clown makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.

Because they want support from those who will accept anything. They don't want to be scolded for bending six year old little Bobby over the log. I'm sure you think I am joking, but look up NAMBLA. I think for at least a year or two I can still get away with not tolerating pedophile behavior.

yes pedophelia is def. on the agenda now that gay marriage is legal in a ton of states.

I can see why they support a nanny state, but the people that have me scratching my head are the people that are out there making a living on their own, people with small buisnesses, people that are actually working for their money. Why they would ever support this clown makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.

Because they want support from those who will accept anything. They don't want to be scolded for bending six year old little Bobby over the log. I'm sure you think I am joking, but look up NAMBLA. I think for at least a year or two I can still get away with not tolerating pedophile behavior.

yes pedophelia is def. on the agenda now that gay marriage is legal in a ton of states.

Yeah, I think Phil Robertson's all for it isn't he?

Genuine conservatism promotes cautious and prudent change, respect for tradition, stewardship, humility, responsibility and fact-based decision making. It is concerned with both individual and societal well-being. With regard to government, conservatism favors a government that is lean, efficient and effective -- not impotent.

I give money to the North Dakota Family Alliance and know members here in Jamestown who keep very close track of these things. There are groups waiting for gay marriage to be passed so they can push their agenda. Already there are groups of ten women who want to marry twelve guys. Maybe two of the guys are gay. We live in a world that is in a fast downward slide.

Plainsman Said:
I give money to the North Dakota Family Alliance and know members here in Jamestown who keep very close track of these things. There are groups waiting for gay marriage to be passed so they can push their agenda. Already there are groups of ten women who want to marry twelve guys. Maybe two of the guys are gay. We live in a world that is in a fast downward slide.

The worst part of all this is all these people moving into this state are bringing their fudged up ideals with them. The disease(liberalism) is spreading and will not be cured.

Yes, there is mental illness here in droves. First of Bonham: the reporter is championed by Fox news and other ill ultra right wing factions. How silly do you have to be to think this is all of the story? The possibilities are endless to the real story. Perhaps the r and D aide had been called in by Larry Craig, the former bathroom boy and republican senator from Idaho who propositioned the undercover agent for sex in the minneapolis airport bathroom and things were terminated so the republican party wouldn't be a continued embarrassment.. Too bad Paul Harvey isn't around so we could hear the rest of the story. Zoggy-I suggest you get your nose to the turf and get the real uncut story.

Plainsman said: Because they want support from those who will accept anything. They don't want to be scolded for bending six year old little Bobby over the log. I'm sure you think I am joking, but look up NAMBLA. I think for at least a year or two I can still get away with not tolerating pedophile behavior"

I'm sorry, but if you want to "not tolerate" pedophile behavior...overwhelming evidence will show that the Christian club you support so much is guilty of way more gay pedophilia than even the advertised pedophile's club. I'm not defending NAMBLA, I'm just pointing out a big black pot calling a big black kettle "black".

Now, back on point, was the guy fired for being gay, black, or republican-curious? or was he just a douchebag claiming discrimination for one of the three reasons? Because he actually got fired for being late every day. Yet its enough to get the extremist turds all fired up to start screaming pedophile, beastiality, and tolerance on a fishing & hunting forum

and for the 1,000th time....can someone explain to me how we have to "TOLERATE" gay people, then explain to me how we would tolerate them any differently if the consenting gay adults were married?

and this is where GST says "IT'S INCREMENTALISM!!!"....yes GST, we know everything happens in increments....can you maybe elaborate beyond the 2 lawyers on the whole planet of 7 billion people you found that happen to be pedophiles and support banging little boys that still have ZERO connection to any gay people?

and please remember, there is a difference between tolerating an asshole that happens to be gay, and someone you have to tolerate because he/she is gay.

if you're serious about putting a stop to pedophilia...vote to ban catholic churches, gay people have nothing to do with this, yet the biggest/most/worst pedo cases and cover ups in history belong to....NOT GAY PEOPLE

GST!...PLAINSMAN!...EYEXER! I'm calling on you guys to think and research, use the scientific method to gather evidence, build a valid argument, use facts and data that can't be so easily refuted, discredited, and debunked....in other words, can you guys come up with some better anti gay people banter that's better than pedophilia and beastiality.

how about a simple "I think a dude plowin another dudes dirt hole is gross"....that would actually be a more valid, and credible argument to support your opinions...and I would have to agree with you to an extent...but still more credible than the whole pedophilia argument you guys keep bringing up.

I won't respond to anything but a semi-intelligent (or at least funny) responses.

so please keep that in mind before thinking our differences in religion somehow makes one side of the argument any more credible. in fact, to help your side out, I would avoid any mention of participation in the catholic church when it comes to discussions about pedophilia.

I know you hate the Catholic church MSA and there is nothing I can say or do to change that. The pedophilia and cover up of the act is absolutely despicable, no argument from me. You can't deny, however, all the good the church has done. It even saved modern science at one time. The mistakes of a few (many) individuals should not reflect them all.

Is it impious to weigh goose music and art in the same scales? I think not, because the true hunter is merely a noncreative artist. Who painted the first picture on a bone in the caves of France? A hunter. Who alone in our modern life so thrills to the sight of living beauty that he will endure hunger and thirst and cold to feed his eye upon it? The hunter. Who wrote the great hunter's poem about the sheer wonder of the wind, the hail, and the snow, the stars, the lightnings, and the clouds, the lion, the deer, and the wild goat, the raven, the hawk, and the eagle, and above all the eulogy to the horse? Job, one of the great dramatic artists of all time. Poets sing and hunters scale the mountains primarily for one and the same reason--the thrill of beauty. Critics write and hunters outwit their game primarily for one and the same reason--to reduce that beauty to possession. The differences are largely matters of degree, consciousness, and that sly arbiter of the classification of human activities, language. If, then, we can live without goose music, we may as well do away with stars, or sunsets, or Iliads. But the point is we would be fools to do away with any of them.

multi-species-angler Said:
Plainsman said: Because they want support from those who will accept anything. They don't want to be scolded for bending six year old little Bobby over the log. I'm sure you think I am joking, but look up NAMBLA. I think for at least a year or two I can still get away with not tolerating pedophile behavior"

I'm sorry, but if you want to "not tolerate" pedophile behavior...overwhelming evidence will show that the Christian club you support so much is guilty of way more gay pedophilia than even the advertised pedophile's club. I'm not defending NAMBLA, I'm just pointing out a big black pot calling a big black kettle "black".

Now, back on point, was the guy fired for being gay, black, or republican-curious? or was he just a douchebag claiming discrimination for one of the three reasons? Because he actually got fired for being late every day. Yet its enough to get the extremist turds all fired up to start screaming pedophile, beastiality, and tolerance on a fishing & hunting forum

and for the 1,000th time....can someone explain to me how we have to "TOLERATE" gay people, then explain to me how we would tolerate them any differently if the consenting gay adults were married?

and this is where GST says "IT'S INCREMENTALISM!!!"....yes GST, we know everything happens in increments....can you maybe elaborate beyond the 2 lawyers on the whole planet of 7 billion people you found that happen to be pedophiles and support banging little boys that still have ZERO connection to any gay people?

and please remember, there is a difference between tolerating an asshole that happens to be gay, and someone you have to tolerate because he/she is gay.

if you're serious about putting a stop to pedophilia...vote to ban catholic churches, gay people have nothing to do with this, yet the biggest/most/worst pedo cases and cover ups in history belong to....NOT GAY PEOPLE

GST!...PLAINSMAN!...EYEXER! I'm calling on you guys to think and research, use the scientific method to gather evidence, build a valid argument, use facts and data that can't be so easily refuted, discredited, and debunked....in other words, can you guys come up with some better anti gay people banter that's better than pedophilia and beastiality.

how about a simple "I think a dude plowin another dudes dirt hole is gross"....that would actually be a more valid, and credible argument to support your opinions...and I would have to agree with you to an extent...but still more credible than the whole pedophilia argument you guys keep bringing up.

I won't respond to anything but a semi-intelligent (or at least funny) responses.

I didn't bring religion into this discussion. I simply pointed out there is a movement to make pedophilia legal and it isn't coming from the catholic church. so how do you feel about polygamy which now appears to be legal?

Meelosh, I don't hate the catholic church one bit...to be honest the catholic church (aside from all the sex abuse cover ups)agrees with many of my views on both political and scientific topics....but that doesn't stop me from pointing out and laughing at the rampant pedophilia within it, every time some self proclaimed "catholic" equates gay marriage to pedophilia.

eyexer to answer your question all religion aside....I have nothing against consenting adults involved in polygamy. if the man or woman has multiple spouses that are all in agreement with the "marriage" it makes no difference to me...except of course some miscellaneous tax credit loopholes I don't know about that should be adjusted and fixed should polygamy ever become legal. I don't care about other tribes of different cultures that practiced polygamy for thousands of years, why the hell should I care if "americans" do it?

Now meelosh....the real question is...did all that good come from "the church" or from people who went to that church.

Look at donation and aid money totals from the Vatican etc. and compare them to the donations and aid money sent by even the poorest countries in the world to disaster and tragedy stricken places on earth. compare that to the donator's assets & worth, then tell me how the catholic church does more good than an average 3rd rate country

Based upon what? There are a number of cultures/beliefs that allow this. Why should you be allowed to push your beliefs unto others? Who gets to determine the age of consent? It's an awfully slippery slope don't you think?

valid point....so WHO is pushing their beliefs onto you? I don't recall a gay dude showing up at my doorstep asking if I'm willing to accept Bruce into my ass....so what part of your life, or mine has to change? I have never once in my life had a gay person ever try to tell me that their preferences or way of life were better than mine or that I had to practice as they did.

some cultures eat dogs...I don't want to eat dogs, but at the same time I don't care if they do. but all of the sudden if it's gay marriage that means everyone is force to eat cocker spaniel for supper

And when has any gay person, group, or organization ever discussed or disputed age of consent? here again the anti-gay side keeps bringing pedophilia and child molestation into the argument.

I don't know Old Jake...what is the age of consent? it was never an issue till you brought it up. well, never an issue with the gay community. I guess a lot of churches raise that consentual age topic a lot.

so please keep that in mind before thinking our differences in religion somehow makes one side of the argument any more credible. in fact, to help your side out, I would avoid any mention of participation in the catholic church when it comes to discussions about pedophilia.

LMAO! Sorry that was funny, carry on gents

"I get what you're saying: Like a sausage replica featuring a Polander holding a sacred illumination device."