'Time Crystals' Could Exist

I reckon he just hates cats and used his "thought experiment" as an excuse.

You can just imagine it now...

"I really hate that cat! My sofa is a wreck where he's been using it as a scratching post. I can't just kill it, I'll be hated by a lot of people.
Oh, I know. I'll make a "thought experiment" and use the cat! Mwahahahahahaha!"

So in other word's a time crystal is a structure that is static in time or has a structure that creates a static disruption in time a little like a
structure in a water current may change it's flow but one that, we would move past it as we are bound to the time flow or rather part of it so they
lens time or warp it and that warping is also dynamic and changes over time from our perspective inside of the time flow (flow being just an analogy
of course).

Quite a predictable structure I should imagine but unlikely to be something we can make ready use of, at least now that is but there may be
application's in thing's such as fusion and fission process and complex reaction's if we can create these structure's that would allow otherwise
impossible interaction's or subatomic behaviors to to take place.

Interesting and if proven this could be an entire new field with some very major implication's.

The total gravitational potential of a system of particles which are in their lowest possible energy state and not changing in height, which should be
preserved and therefore symmetrical (the total gravitational potential that is,) could be broken (which I can only speculate means changed rather than
preserved in this context?) in theory, by virtue of said particles moving in a pattern (such as a circle) which allows them to in some way move away
from and return periodically to their original state, despite no rotational energy being radiated from said system of particles.

And now my head hurts even more from writing that because that was me trying to dumb it down for myself, and I still don't fully comprehend it LOL.
Calling actual quantum physicists: we need a layperson's conceptualization STAT!

Evidence references a "point". That point could easily be a singularity of continued energy that completely follow the laws of thermodynamics. Energy
cannot be created nor destroyed. Therefore there can never be a "starting point" of time. Only checkpoint references. It has always existed.

You've really never heard of the great crunch? When all matter starts losing energy and contracting on itself to a singular point. Then it kinda goes
boom and expands exponentially due to the chemistry involved.

The "current model" does not talk much about contraction.

Actually it does, and the numbers involved are in the hundreds of trillions of years. Nothing we will ever observe in our human conscious
forms.

It's been superseded. Evidence does not support it. An accelerating rate of expansion does not support it. There is not enough matter (even with dark
matter). There will be no crunch, entropy will rule. Ultimately.

I'm a fan of the Big Bang (expansion) and Big Crunch (contraction) theories. The only issue I have is, what came before the first bang?

There's only a few possibilities that would make any sense (in my opinion)...

-It's an infinity loop
-There was something outside our universe that created it (God, aliens etc)
-Alternate universe loops (takes a while to explain, but basically the collapse of an alternate universe creates a new, alternate universe)

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.