Q Ari, regarding the Clinton pardons, the Bush administration
has widened the concept of executive privilege to cover information the
President may never have seen or known about. Is this administration
working under the belief that past administrations were too cooperative
in turning over information to Congress and, therefore, weakened the
principle of executive privilege? Are you trying to right a balance
here?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, this question deals with standard issues
involving Freedom of Information Act, not executive privilege. In
fact, if you look halfway through that article this morning, it made
clear that the issue was about Freedom of Information Act provisions
and the Exemption 5 under the Freedom of Information Act.

It is not about executive privilege. Even though the top part of
the article curiously referred to executive privilege, the middle of
the article said it deals with freedom of information, which is a
different matter. In this matter, we are following a standard,
straightforward case dealing with the Freedom of Information Act. The
Department of Justice has concluded that the documents sought by
Judicial Watch are protected under the laws dealing with freedom of
information.

MR. FLEISCHER: Prince Bandar and his family came to visit the
President today at his ranch. It was both a social visit, as well as a
business visit. The two met privately, along with Dr. Rice, for a
little bit over and hour; and then the family stayed and they had
lunch. And the President just now finished a tour of the ranch with
Prince Bandar and his family.

They discussed a variety of issues, including prospects of
enhancing peace in the Middle East. They discussed the war on
terrorism and Saudi Arabia's cooperation in the war. They discussed --
the President raised the issue of child custody cases in Saudi Arabia
dealing with American citizens. Specifically, the President brought up
the issue of Amjad Radwan's case in Saudia Arabia and asked for that
issue to be resolved so she can be brought back to the United States.

Q Iraq?

MR. FLEISCHER: On the topic of Iraq, the President stressed that
he has made no decisions, that he will continue to engage in
consultations with Saudi Arabia and other nations about steps in the
Middle East, steps in Iraq. And the President made very clear again
that he believes that Saddam Hussein is a menace to world peace, a
menace to regional peace, and that the world and the region will be
safer and better off without Saddam Hussein.

Q Can you describe the Prince's reaction -- or the Ambassador's
reaction?

MR. FLEISCHER: No. I let the Saudis characterize their own
reaction to it. I don't think it would be appropriate for me to do
so.

Q Can you say if the conversation, as quoted in the Saudi press,
by the Saudi press agency today, is quoted accurately?

MR. FLEISCHER: The gist of the conversation is correct. I saw
that -- there's been some, I guess you could call it a game of
telephone as the version gets told and told and told to different
parties. The original Saudi News Agency story did not have any direct
quotes from the President. And then I saw in some American accounts
direct quotes from the President. Those quotes are not accurate,
they're not verbatim. They do have the gist of the conversation
accurate, but none of those verbatim quotes are accurate, for what
that's worth.

The President and the Crown Prince did have an 18-minute
conversation yesterday in which the President spoke to him about
overall U.S.-Saudi relations. They did discuss the recent defense
board's statements that the President conveyed to the Crown Prince had
nothing to do with the views of any senior level government
administration officials, including himself, including the Secretary of
Defense or the Vice President. And they also talked about path to
peace in the Middle East. The topic of Iraq did not come up in the
conversation with the two, with the Crown Prince and the President.

Ron.

Q Back on the custody case, did the President -- make sure the
child is brought back?

MR. FLEISCHER: That's correct.

Q And what was the spelling of that name?

MR. FLEISCHER: Amjad Radwan. And the President cited in this case
and in other cases the crying humanitarian concerns, the issues
involving justice, and the rights of people to come back to the United
States if that's their desire. And I will tell you on this, the
Ambassador said he will relay the message back to officials in Saudi
Arabia. But the President made a very powerful case, based on
humanitarian reasons, based on America's sense of justice, and based on
what the President views is a matter of right and wrong.

Q -- Ambassador's response on that issue, but not on Iraq?

MR. FLEISCHER: Because this is a conveyance of information. The
decisions on these things will be made by Saudi officials, and Saudi
officials can inform you what the decision is. When it comes to a
routine conveyance, I'm happy to pass that on to you.

Randy.

Q Did the discussion of oil come up in the meeting today?

MR. FLEISCHER: I don't have anything specific on that. I just
know, as I indicated yesterday, the Saudis have a longstanding policy,
which we have seen carried out in action in addition to rhetoric, about
not using oil as a weapon.

MR. FLEISCHER: The latest numbers from the Congressional Budget
Office underscored the need for Congress to show restraint in
government spending, unless we want deficits to come back bigger than
they ever have before. These recent numbers confirm that, as a result
of a recession and a war, the numbers in the deficit have increased.
According to the CBO report, in August --earlier in August, 80 percent
of the change for revenues in the year 2002 stems from what CBO calls
technical and economic concerns. In other words, the recession has
caused revenues to fall short of their targets.

CBO has concluded that the tax cut -- that there would still be a
deficit even if there had been no tax cut. And so what the President
believes the lesson from today's CBO numbers are, that Congress needs
to hold the line on spending. If Congress won't do it, the President
will do it for the Congress.

Q -- said that it attributes a total of $2.4 trillion of the
decline since early 2001 to legislative action. Half of that is tax
cuts and half due to new spending. So if you're calling for a
restraint on spending going forward, would you not also call for a
restraint on cutting taxes further, as the CBO says -- it gives equal
weight to both of those factors for the decline in 2001.

MR. FLEISCHER: No, the President views the tax cuts as one of the
reasons that the economy is coming back. The tax cut was well-timed to
produce more growth. But the real danger to the budget comes from pork
barrel spending by the Congress. And that's why the President, in
effect, vetoed $5 billion worth of congressional spending that Congress
tried to label an emergency, that the President did not accept. The
President will continue to protect the taxpayers' dollars.

Patsy.

Q Ari, can you give us some more color from the meeting, like
how many children were there, what they had for lunch, did the
President drive?

MR. FLEISCHER: Yes, I can do that. Lunch included grilled
chicken, Mediterranean salad, fresh green beans grown locally, and
biscuits. The Ambassador was joined by six of his eight children, and
one of his children, of course, is a student at Baylor University. And
three of the eight stayed for lunch; three others went back to Baylor.
As I say, lunch lasted for about an hour. They were casually dressed,
wearing jeans and blazers, or khakis.

Q We're the President's daughters there --

MR. FLEISCHER: No.

Q Did the President drive --

MR. FLEISCHER: And then the President, following the lunch the
President took the Ambassador and his wife on a tour of the ranch. The
President was driving his pickup truck.

Q Did the President address any of the Saudis' concerns about
the September 11th lawsuit and the possibility of their assets here in
the U.S. being freezed?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, that issue did not come up.

Q The lawsuit did not come up?

MR. FLEISCHER: Did not come up.

The question was, did the lawsuit of September 11th families come
up, and the question did not come up.

Q Did at any time the question of a possible military attack
against Iraq come up? And did the Prince --

MR. FLEISCHER: No, the President discussed Iraq in a general
sense, because the President has not made a decision about the use of
military action vis a vis Iraq. And so he discussed it in, as I
indicated in the beginning, without that type of specificity because
he's made no decisions.

Q -- opposition to any military action?

MR. FLEISCHER: Again, I think it's best to let the Saudis
characterize their own answers.

Q Does the President feel that he made any headway in convincing
the Saudis that regime change --

MR. FLEISCHER: Listen, I think it's fair to say --

Q Question?

MR. FLEISCHER: Did the President think that he made any headway in
convincing the Saudis. Again, under the McClellan rule I will repeat
the questions. I do note that Mr. McClellan will begin his gaggle
tomorrow. Today is my last day down here. I would urge, on a
preemptive matter, that if Mr. McClellan refers to any of my gaggles or
says anything in his statements, I will immediately be available for
comment back in Washington. (Laughter.)

On the question of headway, I think it's fair to say that every
time the President meets with foreign leaders and the topic of Iraq
comes up, the President thinks it's a constructive exchange of ideas.
He listens carefully to the thoughts that people have about how to deal
with Iraq. He hears them say and agree with him that Saddam Hussein is
a threat, that Saddam Hussein is a menace. And then the President
makes his case about why the world would be better off without Saddam
Hussein there.

I've said repeatedly the President has not made any decisions. The
President is patient and the President will proceed at a timetable that
he thinks is in the interests of our country based on intelligence
information that he receives. And I think throughout this time period
you will see the President continue to listen, to listen carefully, to
explain his case. But again, the President is speaking in general
terms at this time because no decision has been made.

I think it's fair to say that if and when the President makes a
decision, the American public will be involved, the President will
consult with the Congress, and the President will at that point have a
strong case to make to other nations. And the President expects that
he will be able to make a compelling case if it reaches that point.

MR. FLEISCHER: The issue has repeatedly come up at multiple levels
of the government. I know the State Department actively has been
pursuing this issue; it has come up before. And the President thought
it had reached the point now where it was appropriate to be brought up
at the highest level.

Q Why now, though? What's changed?

MR. FLEISCHER: Because not enough progress has been made. Because
people who should be allowed to come back to the United States have not
been able to. And so the President thought, after allowing it to
proceed up normal channels, it was appropriate now to elevate it to a
higher level. And that's an expression of the depth of concern that
the President has about this, again from a humanitarian point of view.

Q -- for one --

MR. FLEISCHER: The President raised the issue of these cases in
general.

Q -- again, besides raising the issue, is he calling for any
Americans in custody, American children in custody --

MR. FLEISCHER: He asked for the cases to be resolved, and for the
one case I mentioned, for Amjad Radwan to be brought back to the United
States, and he urged resolution on all these cases. Many of them are
similar in nature.

Dana.

Q Ari, would you say that Bandar was agreeing that Saddam
Hussein is a menace? And can you say for sure that there was no
discussion of over-flight rights, bases, any particulars like that?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, again, the President did not get into that type
of specific level of issue because the President hasn't made a decision
that would involve any of those issues.

Q But Bandar was agreeing that Saddam Hussein is a menace?

MR. FLEISCHER: Saudi Arabia's position has long been, if you have
listened to Adel Al-Jubir, for example, that Saddam Hussein is a
threat.

Q Was there any discussion about the Saudis taking some of their
investment monies out of the United States in recent weeks?

MR. FLEISCHER: Condi gave me the briefing on it and she did not
mention anything about that, so that was not brought to my attention.

Q The President is frequently making the case that Iraq needs to
make a transition to a democracy. Did he also make the case here to
Prince Bandar that Saudi Arabia needs to make a transition to a
democracy?

MR. FLEISCHER: Again, I've given you the briefing that I've gotten
from the National Security Advisor.

Q No --

MR. FLEISCHER: I've given you the briefing I've gotten from the
National Security Advisor.

Q Ari, yesterday you said there is an important difference
between preemptive attack and preemptive doctrine. Can you explain
what that difference is specifically?

MR. FLEISCHER: Preemptive doctrine, of course, as laid out by the
President at West Point and as expounded upon by the Vice President
yesterday, says that time is not on America's side. And, unlike the
world we faced when we had rational enemies, when mutually assured
destruction did indeed serve as a deterrent to war, as a way of
preserving the peace; that we now are in a different era, an era in
which nuclear bombs can be brought to the United States in suitcases,
dirty bombs; and that the threat from terrorists who have no homeland
to defend, who have no interest or little interest in defending any
people, their whole mission is, as terrorists, to inflict maximum
damage on the United States and on other democracies. We don't have
time to wait for them to develop these weapons and attack us without
any warning.

And therefore, the doctrine of preemption, as the President laid it
out, is a way to continue America's efforts to promote peace around the
world by denying them the ability to inflict damage on us.

Q Does the doctrine of preemption encompass as a possibility
preemptive attack? Or does it preclude a preemptive attack?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, the President -- the President at West Point
made the case, it includes the case for preemptive attack.

Q One other follow-up. The Vice President yesterday talked a
lot about preemptive action. Aside from the possibility of a military
attack, is there other specific action that the United States can take
preemptively towards Iraq, and what is that action?

MR. FLEISCHER: I'm not going to speculate about any individual
possibilities. The President has said that he has a variety of options
that he will consider.

Q Is the White House releasing any photos of the meeting?

MR. FLEISCHER: Yes.

Q And why was there no media coverage given? As you said
yesterday, Prince Bandar is affable and speaks excellent English.

MR. FLEISCHER: Because, as I -- when I announced the meeting on
Friday, I said there would be no press coverage. And the President,
when he has meetings with ambassadors, does not have press coverage.

I mean, I know it's Crawford and it's August and it's the only game
in town in Crawford in August for the President. But that's part of
the White House policy; we typically do not have coverage of meetings
with ambassadors.

Q Ari, in his speech yesterday, the Vice President seemed to say
-- said that the Israeli/Palestinian situation would probably be easier
to work with if Iraq were dealt with. Are you signaling that the
Middle East peace process is in any way put on hold until you've
settled the question of Iraq?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, clearly, when the President and the Ambassador
today talked about peace in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia continues to
play a constructive role in helping bring about peace in the Middle
East and reform of Palestinian institutions. No, they both are
important.

One other point I should bring up, too, in the meeting that did
come up, and this is vis-a-vis the war on terrorism and the
reconstruction of the Afghanistan government, the President did remind
Saudi Arabia, as he does other nations, about their responsibility to
meet the pledges they have made in the reconstruction of the Saudi
[sic] government. Many nations around the world have pledged to
contribute money for the reconstruction of the Afghani government and
very few nations, including Saudi Arabia, have met their commitments.
The President urged Saudi Arabia to meet their commitment. It's
important to the future stability of the Afghanistan government. Saudi
Arabia is not alone in being a nation that had made an oral promise to
the people and to the government of Afghanistan, as well as to the
United States and to the ISAF nations and it's very important to
provide stability for Afghanistan that these nations meet their
financial commitments.

Q -- a reaction to that?

MR. FLEISCHER: Again, I will allow the Saudis -- I think it's
their place to characterize reaction.

Q Ari, when you said that the President and foreign leaders
typically agree that Saddam Hussein is a menace when they meet, was
that agreement also expressed today with the President and Prince
Bandar?

MR. FLEISCHER: Well, I got that question earlier. And, again,
I'll let the Saudis characterize their own answers. I'll just tell
you, it is the position of the Saudi government, as expressed by Adel
Al-Jubir that Saddam Hussein is a threat, and then the other thoughts
that the Saudis have about what that means. But they have clearly
expressed that.

Anything else? Holly.

Q Heidi.

MR. FLEISCHER: Oh, Heidi. I did that yesterday, too. Strike this
transcript.

Q Anthony Zinni just came out and criticized any attack on
Iraq. Do you guys have comment on that?

MR. FLEISCHER: Again, the President has made no decisions and the
President will continue to be deliberative, be patient. As the Vice
President said yesterday, we will not underestimate this risk.

Q Was Mrs. Bush there for lunch?

MR. FLEISCHER: She was.

Q Were either of the daughters?

MR. FLEISCHER: No.

Q Any plans by the President to talk about Iraq in his speech in
Arkansas on Thursday?

MR. FLEISCHER: I'm sorry, the question is what will the
President's speech in Arkansas be about?

Q Will it be about Iraq?

MR. FLEISCHER: No, I think it will be about domestic issues. Mr.
McClellan will be able to fill you in closer to the date.

Q On the topic of presidential speeches, it now looks like
Secretary Powell is going to talk about the Middle East at UNGA. Can
you say what date the President is going to speak to the U.N. General
Assembly and generally what topics will --

MR. FLEISCHER: No, I will have more to say on that closer to the
U.N. General Assembly. That's not until September 12th.

Dave.

Q There's indication one of the people the FBI wanted to talk
to, whose name was al Rajid, whose name was found on that disk in
Afghanistan, has now returned to Saudi Arabia. It's not clear whether
the FBI will have access to him. Did this subject come up in the
President's --

MR. FLEISCHER: Condi did not brief that to me.

Anything else? All right. Let me just say one final note -- and
this is my last gaggle here before I return to D.C. tomorrow, and I
want to say this. I just want to thank the people of Waco and the
people of Crawford for all their hospitality down here, and for the
school for allowing us to use their facility. I just think it's --
they're wonderfully hospitable people, very kind. And I think
everybody that comes down here really enjoys their month of August
here, and I know I do. It's been a great 10 days down here.

And so I just want to say thank you to all the people who helped
make it possible for those of us who visit you from Washington. Thank
you. (Applause.)