My sponsor is now Pemtant, by the way, obviously inspired by Pemto and Pemta. It also looks nicer than 'Ants'.

Edit: I seem to recall merging messages together being preferred above posting another post on this forum, but I can't seem to delete this one to do so. I can report it, but I have to choose from a drop-down menu, and a fitting option doesn't seem to be available.

Picking favourites out of 100 cars seems difficult. Couldn't we do a first round where everyone just says 'Yes' or 'No' for every car (whether they like it or not), and the 32 cars with the highest Yes/No ratio go on to the next round?

How are you going to count the votes? Divide the amount of checkmarks by the amount of crosses, I guess? At first I thought you could just subtract, but then cars that got less overall votes will be having a disadvantage.

How are you going to count the votes? Divide the amount of checkmarks by the amount of crosses, I guess? At first I thought you could just subtract, but then cars that got less overall votes will be having a disadvantage.

I don't see this as an disadvantage when cars got less overall votes then others. This just means, that not so many people want to see the car in the pack (or not so many doesn't want to see it in the pack). Usually this happens with not so eye-catching or very neutral cars.

We're not making rocket science out of it. We will just generate a delta-value, by substracting down-votes from up-votes. The 24 cars with the best delta-value will make it to the final.

I don't see this as an disadvantage when cars got less overall votes then others. This just means, that not so many people want to see the car in the pack (or not so many doesn't want to see it in the pack). Usually this happens with not so eye-catching or very neutral cars.

We're not making rocket science out of it. We will just generate a delta-value, by substracting down-votes from up-votes. The 24 cars with the best delta-value will make it to the final.

I disagree. If someone doesn't want a car in the pack, they should vote against it, not not vote at all. I think the cars with less votes would be cars that are in the middle of the pack, as opposed to at opposite ends.
But at this point, the calculations have already been done, so I guess it doesn't matter anymore.

I don't see this as an disadvantage when cars got less overall votes then others. This just means, that not so many people want to see the car in the pack (or not so many doesn't want to see it in the pack). Usually this happens with not so eye-catching or very neutral cars.

We're not making rocket science out of it. We will just generate a delta-value, by substracting down-votes from up-votes. The 24 cars with the best delta-value will make it to the final.

I disagree. If someone doesn't want a car in the pack, they should vote against it, not not vote at all. I think the cars with less votes would be cars that are in the middle of the pack, as opposed to at opposite ends.
But at this point, the calculations have already been done, so I guess it doesn't matter anymore.

607, I have tested your variant, only to see the difference. There is only a difference for one car. With your calculation, Mountain Pew would have made it to the final 24, and The Cleaners not.

I understand, what your idea was, but in this case we were lucky that there was not a big difference.

The parameters team is currently preparing the 16 cars for release. Unfortunately, progress is slow at the moment. Expect a release by May 12 if things go well. Otherwise, we might unfortunately have to wait until the the end of the month.