Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Non-HIV AIDS

I have Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFS/CFIDS/ME) and NON-HIV AIDS, idiopathic CD lymphocytopenia. With these two clinical diagnoses, I believe that makes me living proof that the AIDS-like CFS/ME is transmissible, something that the medical establishment seems unable to admit or to acknowledge. I also believe it makes me living proof that CFS and NON-HIV AIDS are the same mysterious immune disorder.

Three years ago, after a heterosexual sexual encounter, I became seriously ill with what looks like the natural disease progression of AIDS. After an "acute infection" and a "period of asymptomatic health," I have fallen extremely ill to an unrelenting, progressively-worsening AIDS-like demise. I can pinpoint exactly when I was infected with my "chronic viral syndrome of unknown etiology" and because the "acute infection" stage was so distinguishable, I can also pinpoint exactly when my undiagnosed pathogen left my body and infected yet another host.

Increasingly, I have become concerned that my systemic diagnosis is caught up in the treacherous politics of CFS/ME and AIDS. Most people with CFS/ME do not like to talk about the many symptoms and immune abnormalities that they share with AIDS patients. I also suspect that most ailing patients would rather be told that they have the very mysterious CFS than to be told that they have AIDS.

I have a Master's degree. I am a director at my firm. I used to be a triathlete. I have never used IV drugs. I have never traveled abroad. I can count my sexual partners on two hands. Statistically speaking, I know that my undiagnosed infectious and communicable disease is not rare...so, you tell me, if they are not in the miscellaneous CFS/ME category, where are all these other immunosuppressed people?

Anyone with CFIDS, who does not consider the possibility that CFS/ME will eventually progress to a NON-HIV AIDS diagnosis, is very well trumping their own ability to diagnosis the root cause of their illness.

Why isn't CFS/ME a reportable disease overseen by our public health department? Why are CFS and ME (i.e., the same exact disorder) suspiciously categorized as two separate illnesses on a worldwide level (i.e., by ICD codes)? Doesn't anyone else but me, very clearly see, the catastrophic cover-up going on here?

Why are we not reading about NON-HIV AIDS cases (and/or the AIDS-like nature of CFIDS) on the front pages of every newspaper in the world? And if CFS/ME is NON-HIV AIDS, then, depending on who you believe, there are anywhere between 500,000 - 14,000,000 Americans out there with a transmissible illness. If that is what it truly is, our new form of AIDS dwarfs the ‘original’ AIDS epidemic ---> TENFOLD.

I am not afraid to say that I have AIDS without HIV -- idiopathic CD lymphocytopenia. I am equally as unafraid of saying the most obvious thing about CFS/ME: IT SURE DOES LOOK LIKE AIDS TO ME.

If it takes courage to think and to say the things that I do, I hope that there will be a miraculous outbreak of bravery from coast-to-coast. I stopped fighting for myself a long, long time ago. I fight for humanity.

I demand a CFS/HIV revolution. Vive La Revolución‏.

To learn more about NON-HIV AIDS, and to see the *new* face of AIDS, please visit: CFS Straight Talk

Related Articles:

People in this conversation

Adam Young Why isn't CFS/ME a reportable disease overseen by our public health department? Why are CFS and ME (i.e., the same exact disorder) suspiciously categorized as two separate illnesses on a worldwide level (i.e., by ICD codes)? Doesn't anyone else but me, very clearly see, the catastrophic cover-up going on here?
27 minutes ago Â· Like
â€¢

Adam Young I can answer this above question
27 minutes ago Â· Like

Adam Young Why isn't CFS/ME a reportable disease overseen by our public health department? Because it costs thousands to treat a patient; thus a burden to the health industry financially.
24 minutes ago Â· Like
â€¢

Adam Young Why are CFS and ME (i.e., the same exact disorder) suspiciously categorized as two separate illnesses on a worldwide level (i.e., by ICD codes)?
24 minutes ago Â· Like
â€¢
Adam Young I can answer the above question also.
24 minutes ago Â· Like
â€¢

Adam Young Because no one really knows what causes the symptoms of the disorders (CFS / ME); and these 2 disorders are just a suggestion of what the diagnosis / doctor is looking at. Like a guestimate or a suggestion. My doctor said 'it COULD be M.E. or it could be CFS. But she couldn't be certain; or she couldn't confirm it.' Maybe it's a new way / softer way of telling someone they have hiv or aids (so not to shock them), plus, it could be a new way of treating the symptoms of AIDS, because it isn't absolute. Meaning it is a tamer way of telling some one, there IS a chance you will survive with these symptoms, a pose to. 'No that's it, you have aids and you are definitely going to die.'
7 minutes ago Â· Like
â€¢

Adam Young I can answer the above question also
7 minutes ago Â· Like
â€¢

Adam Young Yes I see it, but not as a cover up. I see it as a way of DIAGNOSIS. For example: One patient, and Two different doctors; giving Two different suggestions to what the illness (disorder) may be. And having Two different schools of thought on how to treat the patient; depending on the Doctors experience/ knowledge and personal out look on treating AIDS / ME or CFS.
A few seconds ago Â· Like