A nearly 15-month legal tussle between climbing brands Mad Rock and Climb X has reached a settlement with each side claiming a win.

The settlement, which was accepted by the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Nov. 29, 2011, dismisses Mad Rock’s claims against Climb X that included allegations of patent infringement, trademark infringement, common law trademark infringement, false advertising, trade/libel disparagement, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition and conspiracy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

In exchange, Climb X’s insurance carrier Oregon Mutual will pay $150,000 of Mad Rock and its parent company's Nelson Sports Inc.’s legal fees. And Climb X will make certain statements of fact on its website, although those statements admit no guilt to the charges above.

Garland started Climb X in the same Chinese factory Mad Rock had just left for a new factory in Vietnam. In September 2010, Mad Rock filed its lawsuit with the above charges, claiming $2 million in damages. (Click here to read the Sept. 20, 2010, SNEWS story on the lawsuit filing.) According to court documents, the court dismissed in March 2011 the patent infringement charge, but the other charges such as copyright infringement were still scheduled for trial in fall 2011.

Mad Rock marketing director Kenny Suh told SNEWS the company ultimately did not want to push the case to trial because it would have had to spend a lot of money on legal expenses, bringing in experts to prove its case. Mad Rock still considers the ordeal a win because the settlement produced statement of facts from Climb X.

Those statements of facts, which are to be posted on Climb X’s website's “About Us” page for six months, per the agreement, include:

>> “Garland was never an officer, shareholder or director of Nelson Sports.”

>> “Neither Climb X nor Climb X Gear LLC has ever been affiliated in any way to Nelson or Mad Rock.”

>> “Young Chu (Mad Rock’s president) was the primary designer of the Mad Rock products. Garland along with other staff of Nelson had input on design and colors of the Mad Rock products."

Climb X also agreed to cease using the product names “Drifter,” “Nomad,” “Asylum,” “Mad Monkey,” and “Monkey,” some of which both sides had used and Mad Rock claimed rights to. The settlement goes into effect after the current version of Climb X's 2012 catalog.

Garland told SNEWS the case is a win for Climb X because the major claims were dismissed. “In the long term, things will play out,” he said, with "two brands competing" on different products, pricing and customer service.

Nelson Sports, parent company of Mad Rock, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit on Sept. 20 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Climb X and Joe Garland. The Mad Rock (madrockclimbing.com) lawsuit includes 12 complaints against Climb X ...read more

In a Jan. 11 news release sent to SNEWS®, Joe Garland announced his departure from Mad Rock with a headline that said, “Garland announces split with Mad Rock Climbing. Founding partner departs, citing internal differences.” While Garland is, in fact, no longer employed at Mad ...read more

When Joe Garland responded to a SNEWS® inquiry seeking more details behind his announced Jan. 11 departure from Mad Rock, he said, by email, “I will have a very good answer to everyone’s questions (not just yours) in two weeks. Thanks for contacting me. Sorry to be so cryptic. ...read more

In one fell swoop, the nearly five-year legal wrangling in two courts in two states between Nautilus Inc. and Icon Health & Fitness were ended when Nautilus announced an out-of-court settlement of all outstanding intellectual property litigation. Details of the settlement were ...read more

Life Fitness has announced LeMond Fitness and itself have settled the legal disputes that took both companies to separate courts against each other. In a short statement issued Aug. 6, Life Fitness noted: “LeMond Fitness Inc and Life Fitness announced today that all outstanding ...read more

Several ongoing legal feuds between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness charging infringements and false advertising have escalated into what seems like the equivalent of paper-wad wars as both companies fired out public statements that infuriated and frustrated the ...read more

A drawn-out legal skirmish over royalties between the former owner of Accu-Measure, the manufacturing arm of AccuFitness, and its current owner has turned out in favor of current management. The judge in the appeal of the case before the Colorado Court of Appeals in Arapahoe ...read more

Unless you've crawled under a rock, it's hard to escape all the buzz about Mad Rock, the "new" shoe company that entered the market last year. We use new in quotes because the shoes come from the same factories that once made Five Tens. Mad Rock's long history in rock shoe ...read more

Icon Health & Fitness has won a stay from a federal appellate court on a preliminary injunction Nautilus had only finalized two days earlier that would have kept Icon from marketing, selling or advertising its Crossbow at least until a December trial. With legal maneuvers flying ...read more