If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Hey there!
This is just a note to let you know we are aware of the Facebook connect issues that are on going. While we work to resolve them we will be turning the feature off. Those of you who joined using Facebook please use the contact us link
Thanks!
The Support Team

On October 19th, 2015 Archery Talk implemented some new classified user requirements.

First, a new user will have to wait two weeks before they will be able to start a classified ad.

Second, a user must have at least 20 posts prior to starting a classified ad. This will go for all users, if you have been a user for two years and have 10 posts, you will not be allowed to start a classified thread until your post count is at least 20.
Please be aware that it takes a little time for the server to recognize and reset your permissions once you have met those two criteria. Please be patient.

If you have not yet received a password reset, please re-issue one here:

Thinking about switching to the new A/C/C this year, have been shooting
carbon express for the last 3 years. The insert they use for that shaft does any body hot melt there inserts in with those shafts.

I haven't shot them side-by-side, but I've been shooting a/c/c's for about 11 years now. I just don't see how they can shoot any better than a/c/c's. Maybe just as well, but better? I kinda doubt it.............

I haven't shot them side-by-side, but I've been shooting a/c/c's for about 11 years now. I just don't see how they can shoot any better than a/c/c's. Maybe just as well, but better? I kinda doubt it.............

When I compared ACCs to XX78s, the 78s shot better...but the ACCs still flew almost just as good....very small difference.

Wrong them being extened outside the shaft (any more than a normal insert) the HP inserts have the "Barrel" in the back of the insert and are longer than convention inserts, hence better alignment.

No, I am not wrong, you are. The HP insert does have the "barrel" in the back, but it does have a lip that sits outside of the shaft unlike the HIT insert, which sits inside the shaft and flush, they give you a tool to seat it properly.

WNY, the 3-28 may work, especially if you plan on using it for target or 3D with light target points (< 100gr). For hunting though I'd lean towards the 3-39 (next size stiffer). Per the Easton hunting charts I think you're borderline between the 2 and usually I find the stiffer size to work for hunting apps -- especially if using fixed blade broadheads. And as far as the bending question, they can, but it usually takes quite a bit of force beyond just normal shooting to cause a bend.

I received mine yesterday amd made up some arrows to use next week during the second season. I like them a lot. The one thing that dissapoints me is that the nock bushing is now straight, but does not sit perfectly flush with the shaft and will not take a wrap properly. It leaves a slight dimple from the gap and it does not stick to the bushing. You can feel the extra weight though. My finished arrow with 125 points, weighed 515 grains. That is with wraps and larger FF 360 vanes. They flew just as nicely as my other ACCs. The other difference is the much bigger and brighter Easton label, though not a big deal. I also like the new HP inserts, though they are heavier at 23 grains.