The
true purpose of these policies is the implementation of Sustainable
Development. Sustainable Development has three components: global
land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.

Sustainable
Development is anti-free enterprise, anti- individual liberty and
anti-limited government. Sustainable Development has no place in a
free society.

A
free society protects its property owners and businesses and helps
them to go about their lives, unencumbered.

A
free society doesn’t set up spy mechanisms to track the whereabouts
of all of its people through a national ID card, as has now been established
in the Patriot Act and the Real ID Act -- no matter what the excuse
or current crisis.

A
free society doesn’t close down whole industries and towns at the
whim of special interests groups who use made up excuses like spotted
owls.

A
free society honors its borders and protects its people from outside
invasion. It doesn’t give the hard earned wealth of its people to
criminals who ignore our laws and our borders to invade us.

And
in a free society, government doesn’t tell its citizens where they
can or can’t place a manger scene at Christmas.

But
today, now that the floodgates are open to allow government intrusion
into any and all aspects of our lives, politics has become a power
struggle between two very similar camps. Republicans. Democrats. Left.
Right. Liberals. Conservatives. Twiddle Dum. Twiddle Dee.

The
bigger government gets, the more money there is for politicians to
make and the more power they have to wield -- the less interest they
have in a quaint idea about limited government and human freedom.

Political
parties that have become drunk with power are not sober enough to
remember their platforms, their histories, their promises, or their
oath of office.

And
so the dream of a free society grows ever dimmer. Instead we grow
almost immune to the daily invasion by government into our lives.
We endure massive restraints on the free market as vital products
are banned.

DDT
is banned, because a special interest group says so. Now millions
over the world die needlessly because there’s now nothing strong enough
to counter the swarms of mosquitoes that carry malaria. Our own cities
are threatened by West Nile Disease. It doesn’t have to be that way.

Oil
companies are banned from drilling oil we so desperately need. In
ANWR, and in the Gulf of Mexico, there is more oil than we may ever
need. We could completely end our dependency of any foreign oil. It
could end the threat of terrorism. We could watch the economy soar.
But we can’t because the agenda of those with power and money control
the Congress. It doesn’t have to be that way.

There
are movements to ban over the counter natural supplements, and fast
food, and air conditioning, and recreational vehicles, and the consumption
of meat, and cars, and suburban housing, and the family pet, and plastics,
and fireplaces, and on and on.

All
because one or one hundred special interests have a political agenda
to do it. And because we have surrendered to them control of our government.
The floodgates have been opened.

Ban
it. Ban it. Ban it. Ban it. These are the sounds of the bombs going
off in a war for control. The war against freedom.

The
one statement that should never be uttered in a free society is: “ban
it.” A free society cannot exist under this weight.

Globally-acceptable
truths

As
I’ve said before, and will say again and again: we’ve lost our core
values necessary to live in a free society. We’ve given up reason.
And we’ve replaced it with whims and whines.

True,
those whines are being carefully orchestrated by a few with a specific
agenda, who know exactly how to move you into their predetermined
direction. Some describe it as a conspiracy. If so, it isn’t very
secret. You can find bold descriptions of how it’s being done in books,
and policy papers and all over the Internet.

But
let me give you a very specific example of how it’s being done, and
I’ll even give you a website address so you can see it for yourself.

I’ve
written many times of the assault on individual thought through behavior
modification techniques such as “Critical Thinking.” This is just
one tool used to lash out at one’s values system. Another is the use
of “situation ethics” problems to challenge attitudes, values and
beliefs.

These
tools are fully employed in today’s government school classrooms as
a means to create a new kind of thinking that is coordinated to fit
a specific worldview. Some call it the global village. “Thought control”
is a much easier way to describe it.

Elsewhere
in our society, the pressure to rethink ones values is seemingly everywhere,
from textbooks and classrooms to television commercials to on-the-job
training courses.

We
are constantly asked how we can be so certain about anything. We are
told there are no absolutes. We are told to just live for the moment.
History is eliminated from civics courses. Math is questioned as to
whether it is exact. Science is ignored for political gain.

How
did we lose our common sense? When did the ability to think rational
thought become replaced with a whine? Where do these ideas come from?

Much
to my annoyance, one of the perpetrators of this anti-reason idiocy
thrust his own pompous irrationality on me through a series of astonishing
e-mail letters that I tried hard to ignore.

His
name is Donald Sagar and he is president of a think tank called the
Eden Institute. He is also a representative to the United Nations
for the Association for World Education. One only has to view his
website at www.edenorg.com to
fully appreciate his delusion.

Mr.
Sagar sent an e-mail to me one quiet Sunday afternoon to disagree
with my articles dealing with global warming, which he most certainly
had found while playing with his Google keys on his computer.

His
first line told me everything I needed to know about Mr. Sagar’s value
system. The e-mail began, “Science aside…” Obviously Mr. Sagar didn’t
want to be bothered by mere science when he had loftier goals in mind.
But he went on, “It is inherently illogical and otherwise irresponsible
to suggest that human activity does not possess the potential to alter
the Earth’s climate.”

Yeah,
I’ve gotten this kind of stuff before in response to my articles.
What he’s saying is, no matter what science tells us, I “FEEL” that
man is damaging the Earth, therefore I insist that it be true.

Incredibly,
he then argued that “energy usage worldwide is increasing at an alarming
rate of speed as 3rd world countries continue to modernize.” My first
thought was he could help cut down on some of that energy use if only
he would shut off his computer and leave me alone.

But
one must not miss the completely astonishing rationale of his statement.
He obviously is one of those who advocate that people who live in
third world countries are simply animals who should always live in
mud huts, walk 5 miles a day for their filthy water and cook over
the quaint campfire in the center of the village.

This
first e-mail was followed a day later with a second correspondence
that was an incredible attack on science: “Science has absolutely
no idea of what preceded the current universe… and no way to hazard
a guess about what the future holds for mankind unless of course the
creations of science are used to definitively destroy that future.”
Are you getting this? According to Mr. Sagar, science knows nothing
and is only a destructive force.

So
who is Donald Sagar and why does he care what I have to say? Why do
you and I care what he has to say?

He
has created the Eden Project, which, he says, can define our problems
on earth and fix them. Here is what the problem is, according to Mr.
Sagar: “Because of the relentless increase in the quantity and complexity
of knowledge in the world, we are experiencing a clash between cultures
that prevents all but the most capable of surviving with any meaningful
identity in tact.” Did you catch that? The reason we have wars, poverty
and misery is because there is too much knowledge.

But,
he hasn’t just dreamed up his project for his own amusement. Of course
not. According to the opening paragraph in describing the purpose
of the Eden Project, he says, “This project will provide decision
makers with a ‘pre-qualified’ option for stemming mankind’s current
slide into chaos.”

Now
reading further one finds that this “pre-qualified” option means that
he simply asked a bunch of ivory tower types and self-appointed globalists
intellectuals to critique his work. They agreed and, poof, we have
a new way of thinking. Facts don’t matter. He already said science
knows nothing. Difference of opinion isn’t to be considered.

Simply
put, Mr. Sagar begins with what he considers to be certain “globally
acceptable” truths, such as Global Warming; or that human beings are
destructive to the environment; or that men are unthinking brutes
who must be controlled from their own actions. It doesn’t matter if
any of this gibberish is true. Once this premise is established then
Mr. Sagar’s theories are easy to put into place.

Now
he is free to establish a “group think” pattern that disallows contrary
thought. It attacks anyone who thinks “outside the box.” Propaganda
becomes universal truth. All he needs now is for those in power, with
their ability to apply force, to make it so. He would refer to it
as the political process.

For
it to work, it is essential that he get the rest of us to stop thinking
and using our own experiences, along with academic and scientific
absolutes, to draw our own conclusions. Once that is established,
it is easy to reject morality, and then only a short step to accepting
the idea that people of third world nations should live out their
days in total poverty for the common good.

It
is then a very short journey to accepting euthanasia as a means to
rid us of the elderly who are no longer useful for the village. And
then, an even shorter step to accepting the final solution of forced
abortion for population control.

He
is dangerous to you and me because he is not alone. His ideas have
been endorsed, promoted and implemented by very influential global
mouthpieces. Who they are is almost as astonishing as what they say
about the Eden Project, which they all endorse. You’ll find the letters
posted on the Eden Project website.

One
is a letter from none other than Robert Muller, Assistant Secretary
General of the UN and one of the main players in the global agenda
to reorder society. He says, “I am referring to the need to establish
a body of objective, globally acceptable information to serve as a
foundation for global education…”

Other
supporters include K.B. Mathur, Director General of UNESCO, the man
in charge of implementing global education policy in our public schools.
There is also Dale Ott, of the World Council of Churches, and many
more heads of global and international organizations that seek to
impose a new way of thinking on the world for their own political
agenda.

Most
telling was a quote from Keith Smiley, President of Mohonk Consultations:
“The planet earth and its people have been experiencing an information
explosion. The uncontrolled expansion of information is dangerous
since it tends to diffuse meaning and purpose.”

These
people are telling us that humans armed with knowledge are dangerous
to the new order they are trying to impose on us.

Where
in today’s life are you familiar with the implementation of Globally
acceptable truth at least in a very mild form? You use it everyday.
It’s a practice called political correctness.

It
started with the banning of certain ethnic jokes. Then, we were condemned
for employing certain stereotypes. Then businesses were told they
couldn’t even ask prospective female employees if they were married
or had children. Today, we aren’t allowed to use the term illegal
aliens. No matter what you call it, this is thought control --globally
acceptable truths and information. It’s the only way you will be permitted
to think.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Imagine
the consequences such thought control will have on the human race.
Thomas Edison wouldn’t have been allowed to even think about such
radical changes as alternatives to candle wax in our well-ordered
society. The Wright Brothers would have been hanged as heretics to
suggest man could fly.

This
is the process with which your children are being deliberately “Dumbed
Down” in government schools. The premise of “globally-acceptable truth”
is the very root of today’s public school curriculum. This is the
foundation on which our new society is to be based, according to Mr.
Sagar. For
part three click below.

It
started with the banning of certain ethnic jokes. Then, we were condemned
for employing certain stereotypes. Then businesses were told they couldn’t
even ask prospective female employees if they were married or had children.
Today, we aren’t allowed to use the term illegal aliens. No matter what
you call it, this is thought control...