Slippery Arabic: islam, peace or submission?

In the debates about Islam, in French or Norwegian we understand that the Islamists have succeeded in dethroning their opponent by claiming that Islam means peace. Even the most knowledgeable debaters of the Islamic culture like my fellow Franco-Kabyle Eric Zemmour does not know the meaning of the word Islam.

The word Islam means submit

Slippery Arabic: islam, salam and peace!

Arabs are semantic manipulators. In Arabic language, some terms, having a common phonetic root, have totally different meanings. Muslims bring them together, hoping that others would not undertand, for propaganda purposes. To illustrate my words, let us take an exaggerated example in English in order to bring out the manipulation: In the word “particular” we find the following words phonetically:
Particle
Parti
Party
Part
Tic
Ass
Article
Art
Here, amalgam is not possible between words because they do not have a common phonetic root. Nothing can be done with these words except to look at them and smile. Maybe we can dare a rapprochement between a “part”, a “particle”, a “party”.
On the other hand, let us take the example of some Arabic words of the same phonetic root SLM
– Salam Hello.
– Salam alikum means “peace be with you”. The Arabs thus saluted themselves long before the advent of Islam.
– Islam means submission to Muslim law, not to Allah as the Muslims claim to give the impression of submission to a god. This small subterfuge makes it possible to clear the Muslims as men charged with enforcing this law. The lawyer (in fact any Muslim) can do nothing, he only obeys God, as a soldier has to execute the orders of his superior. There has never been an execution squad or an official executioner convicted of murder, right?
– Silm means peace, but in Arabic spoken, Arabic speakers always use the word “lehna”, at least in North Africa. When Muslims address non-Muslims they make a small contortion to confuse “silm”, “islam” and “salam” to make believe that Islam is a religion of peace. Thus, they claim that “salam alikum” means “peace be upon you” and from there they slip to suggest that “Islam”, with the same phonetic root as “salam” and “silm”, is therefore Religion of peace.
– sellem means to deliver, in the sense of “giving”
– Soullem is the scale.
– salim means healthy.
–Asteslem means to surrender.”
– Aslem means to submit, convert to Islam, but Muslims interpret to non-Muslims “enter into the religion of peace”
– Teslem means you will be safe. Hence the famous injunction of the Muslim warriors: aslem, teslem (submit yourself, convert yourself, and you will be safe).

Of course, it would be unnecessary to point out that Muslims (Arabs or not) make the difference between all these terms of pronunciation so neighborly that it easily deceives non-Muslims without confusing the Muslims.

4 comments on “Slippery Arabic: islam, peace or submission?”

Islam, like the so-called Arabic language, is not created in Arabia, which has existed only since the end of the Ottoman Empire (about 1932).

I note that you had not yet understood anything about the origin of Islam. And yet the so-called Arabic grammar is made by Numidian Christians in particular the ancestors of the Kabyles. All that is said Arabic there is not a single Arabic word because the Arab people is an invention. You will never find Arab ancestors or civilization apart from the lies of Orientalists on all sides who have falsified history and given the attributes of the true civilizations destroyed, such as Numidian. The laws of brash are Islam.
We even invented an Arab world with an ARABIC DNA. And everybody believes in the false writings of pseudo historians. It is the Punic language of which the Syriac said Arab by usurpation is derived. It is thus of the Berber and made for Arabic.
ISLAM..From slam, selem fellas-en. It is tamazight that is made past for Arabic thanks to the French orientalists. Berbers are taken for Jews of the Arabs etc., whereas this is nothing in the light of a sharp analysis of the falsified past.
What is unbelievable is that the Kabyles do not understand why it was their ancestors who built and created the university and not imaginary Arabs that DIABOLIC France created to divide the Berbers of the interior and England at Early 20th century with fictitious Arab nations. The truth is on the way …
FRANCE has a heavy responsibility in the destruction of the Berbers.

It is clear how it does everything to impose the existence of the Arabs while denying and dismissing all that is Berber whose true history millennium, deep and luminous of the West, which haunts it with regard to their past.
Nothing will stop the truth. It is en route despite the contribution of corrupt scientists who have agreed to make believe Arab and Jewish Adn. As if by chance, there are only these two peoples who are attached to religions and who have serious problems of existence to go so far as to concede to them percentages of (non-Berber) particular (fictitious) DNA, whereas the real ones More ancient .. all come from the Berbers. And nobody notices this ..
How can African-born Berbers have an Arabic or Jewish DNA while their ancestors have populated the world? The story written by the forgers is only lies and knitting.

Ivan,I agree with you on a few points
-1) it is very probable that Arabs are not at the root of Islam
.2) That the Arabic word does not designate a people but an economic social behavior. Pillaging nomads. Any nomad could be called aarab. Ibn Khaldun described the aarab as people without any civilized behavior and without any religion
3)Arab invasions in the 7th century to impose Islam is a false idea. Research on the DNA of peoples shows that in spain there is no trace of Arab genes. In Tunisia barely 4% of the Arabic genome only because the nearness of Tunisia with the east, As much as one finds in Italy or in Greece.
4) It is very probable that the Berbers and the Spaniards contributed greatly to the writing of the Qur’an and the hadith since it seems that Islam is a syncretism of the Arian Christian sect and Greek legends.
The mystery lies in the Arabic language in North Africa. We know until the twelfth century that the Arabic word has not been pronounced in Europe or North Africa. The book of the ibadids “Kitab el Barbariyya” written between the eleventh and fourteenth century is very clear on this point. Even if this Arabic language was made for the needs of a new religion, I do not understand how it has become established in North Africa.