For every 1 good player running LFR you have at least 24 no where near as skilled/capable/knowledgeable/equipped (either character or computer). So yup, they will continue to make it work for the people it is targeted at. If you are way to good for it, you should go run Normals or heroics, and be quiet. If it isn't what you are doing, you are just being jackasses sticking your nose in to ruin it for someone else.

For every 1 good player running LFR you have at least 24 no where near as skilled/capable/knowledgeable/equipped (either character or computer). So yup, they will continue to make it work for the people it is targeted at. If you are way to good for it, you should go run Normals or heroics, and be quiet. If it isn't what you are doing, you are just being jackasses sticking your nose in to ruin it for someone else.

Why would someone skip a shitload of gear for doing nothing?

This argument makes sense when you are already into normal/heroic raiding and are wearing last tiers gear. And I am very sure all those people, who basically don't need gear from LFR, are not even using LFR because it is really not that much fun except for those very rare runs you might do with friends.
Besides that people also have alts. If you want to gear an alt then you would be stupid to not use LFR. It's the most effective way of gearing up and people expect others to not do it... Someone saying "just don't do dailies if you don't like them" makes much more sense.

---------- Post added 2013-06-17 at 07:07 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Ealyssa

Yet I still wiped 4 time on him just 10 minutes ago, post nerf.

hellFR is just this bad.

And these nerfs are not going to help.

I'm not even sure why you would nerf a boss this late into the tier in LFR with determination...

Can someone enlighten me pls?
Why are some rogues complaining about recuperate?? The last change i know was "healing up to 4%, up from 3%". So its actually a buff. Just from reading I (also rouge-player) would say, its not much, but a little survivability boost.

I like the Simcraft rankings, more stuff for people to throw at Blizzard, only in this case they would have a point. Clearly Mages and Monks need an adjustment.

... Yea, if the simcraft DPS listed on there would make sense for actual ingame fights, and were perfectly coded taking into account all the neccesary details.
Moreover, -any- simcraft ranking (even if coded perfectly) only makes sense for individual fights, not as much 'overall'.

The mere fact it shows monks above rogues/warlocks (just to name the most obvious) voids any value the ranking might have.

I like the Simcraft rankings, more stuff for people to throw at Blizzard, only in this case they would have a point. Clearly Mages and Monks need an adjustment.

Do you actually see these classes completely dominating the meters? What about specs like elemental for cleave fights or classes with superior AoE over others? Classes that benefit from a longer execute phase? What about classes that are heavily deterred and diminished by movement exactly like mages?

Simcraft is by no means an actual indication of DPS capability and is not indicative of potential DPS outside of target dummy encounters (which are extinct).

Learn to understand what simcraft actually is before you have an opinion and start shouting "NERF!".

Blizzard would respond like they have in the past...that simcraft is largely useless for measuring DPS and deciding what needs nerfing or buffing. It's simply a tool for optimisation and you should leave it at that.

What WowProgress has done is only bad. The community will change for the worse. What purpose does it actually serve other than to stroke peoples epeen?