If Islamic banks cannot be an ease to the ummah, there’s no reason for its existence. If charging compounding interest is considered zalim (discriminatory), the act of filing a default for bankruptcy without helping the borrowers can be considered as zalim too. In Surah Al Baqarah verse 280, Allah swt reminded the lenders to give more time to borrowers who are having difficult times to make payments and even remit the loans as sadaqah (charity).

Surah Al Baqarah, verse 280:

“If the debtor is in a difficulty, grant him time Till it is easy for him to repay. But if ye remit it by way of charity, that is best for you if ye only knew.” (Translation by Yusuf Ali)

While I see Islamic banks/scholars are very critical about riba’ (usury) financing, they are not critically the same in this matter. A borrower being filed for bankruptcy will have difficulty in his/her life. Hence the Islamic banking system can be a real changer and different from the conventionals (so far the perception of Islamic banking as the “shadow” of the conventional banks has not abated) if it has its own unit of managing and helping borrowers who are having problems. This unit can help the troubled borrowers to restructure their loans and in some cases the loans can be remitted. This is what I mean “being an ease to the ummah.” Of course not every non-performing loan can be qualified to be remitted. There must be a risk evaluation on this. But I am positive that it can give a good impact to the Islamic banking system, economy and ummah as a whole. Bear in mind that Islamic banking should not move away from one of the main Islamic values i.e. being just. If the system is discriminatory, then it’s not Islamic. This way, the Muslims and even non-Muslims know that they can depend on the Islamic banks when they are having difficult times. Islamic banks should not follow the predatory practices of the conventional banks when it comes to loan defaults.

Another aspect of Islamic banking that I would like to comment is the Syariah council (Islamic scholars hired by banks to oversee the compliance of financial products according to the Islamic law). In my humble opinion syariah council should not be paid by the bankers. I see this as a conflict of interest. I’m not implying that syariah councils hired by banks cannot be trusted. They are very knowledgable people in Syariah. But humans are humans. They should be hired by the regulators aka Bank Negara (the Central Bank) or become a free governing body. Any application for Islamic banking license or product must go through them. This will keep the system clean from fitnah and any wrong doings in the future, at the same time maintaining consistent practices.

In the future, I am praying that there will be Syariah councils which consists of people who are experts in both field of mathematical finance/banking and Syariah. Some colleges which are offering the Islamic banking/finance courses hopefully are having this in mind. Such council with two fields in mind can orchestrate the creation of new banking products and risk management system which would not be the “immitation” or mirror of the conventional banking system.

I am not against the Islamic banking system. I love that Islamic banking is free from speculating activities. Conventional banking system has become a paper money casino, which contribute to the instability of the current financial system. There are rooms for the Islamic banking system to improve.

In the end we must all know that this system is standing on a system that I considered non-Islamic – the fractional reserve banking system and paper money system. I do not know if Islamic banks can survive in a 100% reserve banking system (how much deposit you have is how much you lend). In the Quran, money is dinar & dirham. Gold & silver must be mined and cannot be manipulated like paper money (can be manipulated by debasing them, but in the past anyone who tried to debase them get a very serious penalty). Paper money is the mother of inflation. More and more money circulating in the economy means inflation. It erodes purchasing power. So in order to retain its purchasing power, savings must be given interest rates/profit returns. If not, money sitting in the banking system will lose its value as prices of goods & services rise due to inflation. Normally, no one would want to save. But in this era of low rates, people are not looking at rates anymore but putting money in a bank has become about convenience rather than seeking investment income. But until the faltering modern financial system goes, we have to operate within the system.

I am still learning and my opinions are solely mine. Allah swt knows best and may He show us the straight path. Please feel free to drop your comments below.

What is the “Grexit”? It’s the inevitable Greece exit out of the Euro zone. Greece should have exited the European Union last year. But the politicians kow-tow to the demands of the EU leaders, its fascist European Central Bank and the mafia IMF. Now Greece is going to be abandoned like an unwanted child. Billions of Euros being shovelled and dumped on Greek banks did not have any effect on the country’s economy. I wonder who are these economics geniuses who think that a debt problem this huge can be solved with more debt.

But it’s a good thing that Greece exits EU. It will have its sovereignty back and the ability to shape & mold its own economic policy, tailored to the aspirations of the Greek people, rather than to the demands of the EU leaders. The most important of all is that Greece will have control over its currency again. M.A Rothschild famously said “Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws.” Very true, especially coming from someone whose lineage is full of currency controllers.

Some might be sceptical that Greece will not and will not be allowed to exit the Euro zone, but evidences show that wealthy individuals, financial institutions & corporations are channelling their money out to safer places. CNBC reported that wealthy savers in Greece & Spain have started to wire transfer their money to safer places such as Geneva, London & Frankfurt, which could lead to “wire-transfer bank run”. Law firms in London are advising honestly to their worrying clients that they should take their investments out of Greece and prepare to take a short term hit. Companies as big as GlaxoSmithKline said that they don’t leave any cash in Greece & most European countries.

But the real question is what will happen when Greece exits the Euro? I first say “Good luck Greece! Enjoy your new freedom!” (and enjoy it responsibly). To the rest of the Europe, the end has just started. Spain, Portugal, Italy, Cyprus, Ireland, etc are waiting in line to get the Euro “paper-toilet” money from ECB. Then they will realize that all debts they get from ECB are worthless in order to solve their problems, including the advices on austerity measures.

So then maybe all of the countries mentioned above will exit EU? That depends on whether their leaders are owned by the ECB & IMF. I will not reject altogether a surprise plan (maybe,there’s no evidence to this,but New World Order,remember?) to integrate all countries in the EU as one nation, with one currency. This might be a few years into the future after the exits of a few countries, especially when the countries exited realized that they cannot compete on their own unless they resort to something such as paying min wages like what China is doing (to keep cost down & remain competitive). Pure speculation of mine, but nevertheless something to ponder.

To this very moment, no one has been able to gauge how much the ripple effect the world will get from the Grexit. Looking into a dark hole where you cannot see the bottom is pretty scary. Europe is that bottomless pit now, and no one is willing to jump into it.