I am disappointed that Sf doesn't support Hal Turner. Hal is most likely throwing in the towel at the end of July. Hal just had a guy on his show named Larry Sinclair. Sinclair is a homosexual who claims to have performed a couple of B.J.'s on Obama in 1999 while snorting cocaine while Obama smoked his own crack cocaine....

Hal isn't supported because he keeps putting out uncorroborated silliness like this, furthering strengthening the notion that he is a pathological liar. Hal isn't capable of honest reporting and/or journalism, if any of his work can serve as an example.

__________________

****** ******Money will buy a fine dog, but only kindness will make him wag his tail.

Do the Jews that have power now outright state that they are pro-Jewish? No, but they effect things this way anyhow. People would be turned off by them immediately if they were open about this, and while the vast majority of sleeper Whites would probably support a constitutionalist program that was not specifically pro-white, there would be resistance to a platform based overtly upon race. The worst of it would be a complete media blackout, where Paul had at least some interest and no hail of bullets flying at him about him being a "racist" or a "White supremacist." That would have been counter productive in the extreme.

I don't want some horrible economic crash if it can be avoided, and to pin your hopes on disaster is not a very attractive proposition. Get back true freedom and the truth will out. That's why the Paul/Baldwin approach is best. We will never get anywhere the other way.

It really does not matter what we want, the economy is looking to crash quite soon.. and there will be unprecedented chaos as a result

Do the Jews that have power now outright state that they are pro-Jewish? No, but they effect things this way anyhow. People would be turned off by them immediately if they were open about this, and while the vast majority of sleeper Whites would probably support a constitutionalist program that was not specifically pro-white, there would be resistance to a platform based overtly upon race. The worst of it would be a complete media blackout, where Paul had at least some interest and no hail of bullets flying at him about him being a "racist" or a "White supremacist." That would have been counter productive in the extreme.

I don't want some horrible economic crash if it can be avoided, and to pin your hopes on disaster is not a very attractive proposition. Get back true freedom and the truth will out. That's why the Paul/Baldwin approach is best. We will never get anywhere the other way.

Thought to clarify and make an additional point:

Agreed about the Ron Paul movement, I supported him with my time and money, even though he is not overtly pro white. He was overtly pro freedom, pro Constitution, and these are 110% white creations and white issues

However, it does not matter what we want concerning the economy, factors are in play that make a massive crash and total societal meltdown inevitable.. all we lack is the date for the major events