How Does Chicago Infrastructure Compare to Copenhagen?

Nørrebrogade in Copenhagen, said to be the world's busiest bike street. Photo: Kristen Maddox

[This is the first post of a two-part series by guest contributor Kristen Maddox. Kristen recently spent a year in Denmark as a Fulbright fellow and worked with Copenhagenize Design Company. Now back in the US, she is actively looking for work in bicycle planning and advocacy. We’ll post the second half this piece on Wednesday.]

At first glance, comparing a city to Copenhagen — especially an American city — runs the risk of being an apples-to-oranges affair. The portion of history that most traffic planners focus on when they look to Copenhagen begins in the mid-1900s, usually in the post-war period. Since there are already so many good examples of articles and books covering Copenhagen’s development, I’d like to home in on the most recent infrastructure developments.

Where is Copenhagen now, and how does it compare to Chicago’s current and future plans? Bicycle mode share in Copenhagen is 36 percent, according to the city’s 2012 Bicycle Account, released this year. Chicago’s current level is 1.3 percent. Chicago’s current goal is 5 percent mode share by 2020 versus Copenhagen’s goal of 50 percent by 2015. Copenhagen has almost too many bicycle facilities to mention: bike superhighways, “green wave” bike-friendly signal timing, bike bridges, bicycle counters, and more.

Let’s take Chicago’s new modal hierarchy as a jumping-off point to introduce the Windy City’s current traffic plans. Part I of this article compares the bicycle culture, planning culture, and ‘typical’ bicycle infrastructure of each city.

Protected bike lane on Milwaukee Avenue. Photo: Kristen Maddox

If you’re short on time, here’s my main point: If Chicago is to come into its own as a safe place to ride a bicycle, as well as a “best practices” example for other cities, it needs to strut its stuff. Bikeway planning should not remain static and repeat the design flaws that are already in place on some Chicago streets, but view existing assets as valuable products worthy of the world stage, able to push the envelope of what’s considered possible.

Pedaling through newer road designs such as Milwaukee Avenue, Dearborn Street, or 31st Street, one sees that Chicago has the necessary ingredients for safe and comfortable bicycle use. But these elements do not yet form the complete whole necessary to encourage bicycle use by the so called “interested but concerned” riders, even as the overall number of bicyclists does increase. Let’s compare the different aspects of cycling in Chicago and Copenhagen to see what’s needed to encourage more risk averse people to ride here.

Bicycle culture

Suffice to say that Chicago and Copenhagen have drastically different bicycle cultures. For example, let’s look at the urban planners who promote cycling in these cities. In Copenhagen, there’s an almost plodding, matter-of-fact rhythm to this work. Planners know that even in the new districts, cycle track will be a given. There is less squabbling over minutia and diversion over technical terms because everyone is familiar and comfortable with bike infrastructure. In the grand scheme of things, I think there is much more trust from advocates in the traffic department’s ability to “get it right,” because bike planning has been done well for decades. Of course there is critique, plenty of it, just like in Chicago, but it appears that there is more disagreement over which large-scale plans to execute than over tiny details.

As Chicago adds more protected and buffered bike lanes, design details will determine how the entire bike transportation network functions. Chicago’s newest bicycle facilities show a diversity of layouts. Whereas Copenhagen has four types of bicycle lanes and paths, Chicago already has a greater variety of bikeways. The relationship between the bike lane and car parking, the width of the bike lane, the level of protection, and the pavement markings can vary from one block to another. This suggests that Chicago bike planners are using trial and error, while in Copenhagen the system is more standardized.

Image: CDOT's Completes Streets Chicago guide.

Modal Hierarchy

Next let’s compare how different transportation modes are prioritized in the two cities. The Chicago Department of Transportation’s recently released Complete Streets Chicago guide establishes a new modal hierarchy, which the Richard M. Daley administration began to explore, but which has been made more explicit and concrete in this latest plan. The document calls for the reprioritization of road user types, valuing the interest interests of pedestrians over all other modes, followed by transit, bicycles, and cars.

Copenhagen claims the Strøget, a pedestrianized street in the medieval city center, is the world’s oldest and longest car-free street at 3.2 km, about 2 miles. Here in the core, walking is an efficient and enjoyable mode. It’s like a year-round version of Open Streets on State Street. Emphasis is placed on invitations to mingle in the public realm, not unlike the original “agora”. Other smaller pedestrian-only streets and squares create havens away from motorized traffic—elements that are largely missing in present-day Chicago.

Copenhagen is an established “city for cyclists.” Whereas CDOT is increasing the number of streets with bicycle facilities, every road in Copenhagen is a cycling street. If there is no bicycle infrastructure, the speed limit for cars is 30 kilometers-per-hour (19 mph) or less.

These low-speed streets are some of the most inviting roads for walking. They are often lined with cafes and bars with sidewalk seating, boutiques, kiosks, and other pedestrian-oriented businesses. The street becomes a place to linger, not just a place to travel through.

In Chicago, most streets don’t have bike facilities. These range from low-speed, quiet neighborhood streets suitable for cycling, to oversize speedways like Congress Parkway. Despite the recent removal of a travel lane on some blocks and the addition of pedestrian refuge island, Congress is still not attractive for cycling.

Riding Chicago’s protected and buffered lanes, one sees that the design type is actually quite varied. In Copenhagen, cycle tracks are always located to the right of parked cars. In contrast, many of Chicago’s so-called protected lanes include sections where the bike lane is located in the “door zone” to the left of the parking lane. On the new stretch of protected lanes on Milwaukee Avenue between Kinzie Street and Elston Avenue, for example, the bicycle lane’s location alternates between the left and right sides of parked cars.

Chicago street surfaces also lack uniformity. I recently counted 107 manhole covers along the two-way protected bike lanes on Dearborn Street between Polk Street and Kinzie. Even with new striping, lane painting, and political support, old potholes remain. Like jousting with car traffic, this is something Copenhagen cyclists do not need to make an effort to avoid; they rarely exist.

In Copenhagen, conflicts between bicyclists and motorists are unusual. Even on the massive HC Andersen Boulevard, similar to Michigan Ave, cyclists are protected from cars on cycle track. Chicagoans who visit Copenhagen experience massive culture shock when they discover that everyone from pedestrians to sports car drivers to truckers yields to cyclists. That never gets old.

Despite the recent removal of a travel lane on some blocks and the addition of pedestrian refuge island, Congress is still not attractive for cycling.

…which makes the location of the Clark/Congress Divvy station rather infuriating. Under current traffic conditions, the only legal and desirable travel direction is south on Clark St. When I see people checking out bikes there, they almost always ride northbound on Clark – on sidewalk or on street (against traffic) – both illegal. The most of the remaining few use the sidewalk on the north side of Congress to get over to Dearborn.

If that station was up the block at Clark/Van Buren, it would make much more sense. The current location works well for people riding to LaSalle St. station but fails for people arriving at the station who want to ride into the Loop.

The changes made on Congress make it less unpleasant for walking, but certainly no more desirable for cycling. It’s still way too much of a speedway.

In Copenhagen, I doubt that we’d face this situation. Chicago is making good progress, but we still have a long way to go.

Still, I think it’s useful to see what we should be aspiring to and we need constant messages. More than 5 Chicago aldermen have gone to visit Copenhagen and other European cities, paid for by Bikes Belong and accompanied by Gabe Klein.

So what they should be accepting is something that’s close to what the City of Copenhagen provides, which I haven’t seen yet. I was in Indianapolis this weekend and rode on part of the 7-mile Cultural Trail. It’s a trail in name only: it’s the most European-style cycle track design I’ve ever ridden on in the United States.

Congress Parkway (west of Wabash Avenue) and Hans Christian Andersen Boulevard in Copenhagen have very similar right-of-way widths: 134 versus 148, but H.C. Andersen varies block to block. Yet they still manage to move hundreds of thousands of vehicles per day (including buses with free wi-fi) and hundreds of thousands of people bicycling (and then the assumed sidewalk).

I still think H.C. Andersen is too big of a car street, but it provides for every mode in a way that makes it convenient and safe for every mode.

The other benefit of H.C. Andersen is that, even though its a wide street that has tons of car traffic, it’s still a major destination street, unlike Congress Parkway, which has no destinations except at Michigan and at State Street. Land use and transportation are inexplicably linked but the Chicago departments that regulate/build each are not so well linked.

Allan Mellis

You should do an article on the automated trains that run smoothly

Anonymous

I’ve only walked past the Indianapolis trail but it looks totally awesome.

Adam Herstein

I’ve been wanting to ride the Cultural Trail, but unfortunately the Amtrak route that goes to Indy does not offer roll-on bike service, and I’m too lazy to box up my bike. Maybe they have rentals there?

There are bicyclists in the subuirbs, too. How do we get a regional discussion going? I work in the ‘burbs and thus live in the ‘burbs. I’d like to bike to work, but I can’t do it safely.

Anonymous

As a Copenhagener I would say HC Andersen Boulevard is one the worst streets we have, its has 56k cars a day and about 23k bikes, yet some of the street still have no bike track, and a street of the magnitude, facilitates too much crosstown traffic, which should go around the outskirts in stead.

Lars, bikecopenhagen.dk

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

[This is the second post of a two-part series by guest contributor Kristen Maddox. Part I compared the modal hierarchy, bike infrastructure and bike culture in Chicago and Copenhagen. Kristen recently spent a year in Denmark as a Fulbright fellow and worked with Copenhagenize Design Company. Now back in the US, she is actively looking […]

Copenhagen is famous for being a city where a lot of people bike. But for years the bike commuting rate has remained roughly steady at just over a third of trips. Then last year the city’s bike commute mode share increased from 36 percent to 41 percent. Meanwhile, driving declined 3 percent as a share […]

Yesterday, the League of American Bicyclists announced that 55 new and renewing municipalities have won recognition in the group’s Bicycle Friendly Communities program, and there are now participants in all 50 states. However, even after all the strides Chicago has made in the last few years, we’re still languishing at the same Silver-level ranking we’ve […]

Earlier this month, the League of American Bicyclists released a report with a method for exploring how well bike networks provide access to underserved communities. Using Chicago as a case study, the report found that our city’s “planned network” would provide African-American and Latino neighborhoods with less than their fair share of access to bike lanes […]

Guest contributor Kristen Maddox recently spent a year in Copenhagen as a Fulbright fellow and worked with Copenhagenize Design Company. Now back in the US, she is actively looking for work in bicycle planning and advocacy. Dearborn Street’s two-way protected bike lanes are equipped with 16 micro-radar sensors with four wireless access points so traffic […]

Today on the Network, Copenhagenize takes a look at a proposal that shakes up the traditional “complete street” concept. As presented in a municipal “idea catalogue,” the plan is to redesign Copenhagen’s Vestergade as a “bicycle street,” where cyclists and pedestrians come first, and motor vehicle traffic is the second-tier mode. The entire road will […]