Noted.

Noted.

The Drum Major Institute talks politics with big-city mayors; what do we say when we talk about torture?

December 13, 2007

Ready to join the resistance?

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three actions every Tuesday.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism

The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back!

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Travel With The Nation

Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today.

Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

IF MAYORS RAN AMERICA:

In today’s presidential campaign, America seems all tractor pulls, county fairs, town halls and truck stops. Candidates scramble for photo ops in plaid, stump in wheat fields and scarf down corn dogs. Yet more than 80 percent of Americans live in cities. By stressing rural voters so strongly, presidential candidates risk ignoring the bread-and-butter issues that matter most to most Americans–housing, transportation, infrastructure and crime. The candidates should, of course, have an urban agenda. But what should it be?

The contrast between the mayors’ priorities and the presidential candidates’ rhetoric couldn’t be more stark. “In presidential elections, the media and pollsters focus on issues like war, abortion, gay rights, things that, quite frankly, for those of us in the trenches, aren’t the hot-button issues,” says Miami Mayor

Manny Diaz

. “People want to know that their kids will get a good education, that their neighborhoods will be safe and clean…. It’s difficult for me to understand how presidential candidates don’t see that. Those are the issues that affect Americans each and every day. We [mayors] are dealing with them, and [candidates] should also be dealing with them.”

Watch Diaz and the others at www.MayorTV.com for insights into urban issues, presidential politics and the elections.

TORTURE-LIKE?

Many Republicans have a hard time calling torture “torture,” but it seems the news desks of major papers have an equally hard time using the T-word, even when it comes to coverage of the CIA’s destruction of what everyone else (including their editorialists) calls the “torture tapes.” In nine New York Times articles since December 6, “torture” appears just thirteen times, while “interrogations” appears eighty-four times. Likewise, in four articles the WashingtonPost printed “torture” sixteen times but used “interrogations” in forty instances.

“Interrogations,” and other euphemisms like “methods” and “tactics,” were sometimes modified as “harsh,” “severe,” “controversial” or “aggressive.” All uses of “torture” in both papers were attributed to critics of the Administration’s “tactics” or used in the context of Administration denials, as in “We do not torture”–a line these papers seem all too willing to swallow.