Grammys Fug or Fab Carpet: Katy Perry, Plus Bonus Crazy

There are a lot of things that are very pretty about this — the color, the detailing — but there is also something eerily pornographic about it. I mean, with a dress like this, should I be able to see every painstakingly traced line of each boob? I shouldn’t, right? I’m not crazy? I mean, at least I’m not seeing her undercarriage, FERGIE, but it’s unsettling nonetheless. Fortunately, Katy gave us a LOT of other stuff to focus on this weekend, so let’s do that instead.

Oddly, though, I think the cut is king of aging on her. Lovely color and detailing, and yes, more see-through than I thought– but kind of looks like the kind of cut that a Meryl Streep or a Helen Mirren would rock. Like it belongs on a grande dame who’s aging kick-assedly. I think it’s the neckline.

I thought that, with proper undergarments, the blue dress would be stunning on Helen Mirren. I think it was just slightly to mature for her, blue hair and all. I wish that crazy floral headpiece had walked the red carpet at the Grammys, that’s the kind of crazy she can pull off.

I actually really liked the blue. It was nice to see her in something that didnt involve candy, candy canes, candy corns and syrup. The fact it was something pretty was just icing on the cake. (Is it lunch time OR WHAT?)

I can live with the dress, though I’m not terribly struck. The blue hair, on the other hand, is utterly dreadful. She could be wearing Bjork’s swan dress or Gaga’s meat dress (or both) and her hair would still be the worst part of the ensemble.

Now, if she’d gone back to her black hair with its 50s vibe, then I’d probably have no complaints at all.

I <3 Katy Perry. I'd love for her to come have a beer with me, except it would probably be "Blue Hawaiians" or some other neon-colored drink. I'm about halfway on board with the Katy/Rihanna pairing, but Rihanna would have to pay for the first date, just so I knew she was serious.

When my stepdaughter was 13 she thought that having blue hair made her edgy, different and special. By the time she was 14, she realized it was just an obvious ploy for attention and that she could differentiate herself by her talents and intelligence. So, I guess I understand why Katy Perry has blue hair.

I love the blue hair. It’s blue, not gray (KELLY), and I like that she went monochromatic with the look. I really think she looks good at the Grammys. Pretty, sexy, but still Katy Perry. I also thought she could have used a bra, but this is an open-back boat-neck; where is she going to put it? I also liked her performance. I like alien overlord from the future Katy much better than faux lesbian Katy.

I meant that I like the blue much better than the gray. If you’re going to try unnatural hair colors, go nuts, not geriatric. (Although I may be biased, as my hair has been every color possible, including gray (that was an accident).)

Maybe I’m getting old. (okay, I’m old.) But every time I see her with a different hair color I think to myself, “Why does that child have {insert color here} hair? She’s so pretty, she just messing it up now….”
The funny thing is that she’s not that much younger than I am…..

The dress-up part is quite typical Katy Perry (something wacky and something retro/vintage and something with color-blocking), but the stage show looks awkwardly too much like Marry the Night video with all the flames and weird-colored bob-length hair and tight clothes. Katy, you can be yourself also without trying to copy Gaga all the time… ho-hum.

I think blue hair could look nice, but under very limited circumstances. The updo with Mirren’s pale blue dress is the way to go. The crimped and the straight, stiff bob, just no. I’m with Ladyblahblah- she is doing this to make up for lack of other skills. Cartoon cutesy-poo can only go so far.

I also love that she and Rihanna are BFFs. I liked the gold dress, I hate the turquoise hair, the blue dress was sorta pretty but made her look fat, the crimping has gotta go, and her performance was pretty good. That is all.

Why does she have it in for her poor hair? What has it ever done to her? I think she and her hair need couple’s counseling so they can live in peace together because life’s too short to have it in for your head suit.
And I love the blue dress.

I think that the blue dress looked awful. It was so matronly, largely because it was hideously unflattering in the bodice and made her look like she had huge, saggy boobs. She has a nice rack, but it needs some support. I liked the skirt of the dress – with a different bodice, it could have been lovely.

If you click on the “enlarge” button to view that lovely blue dress, it’s apparent that what looks like a see-through bodice is actually the lining, as is evident from the skirt. I think it’s gorgeous–as is Katy.

She looked SO gorgeous and ladylike in this dress. It was great to see her out of something latex/candy colored/teen pop or featuring boob guns. I think she look perfect and let her true beauty shine. I have no idea why people are knocking it. And her hair was SO cute (not crimped, but before). I <3 her.

While I love the blue gown, the hair (color and style) was so unflattering. In the picture with Rihanna, I noticed that she has a French manicure with BLUE tips. She is so pretty and seems so determined to look odd.

I thought her performance was terrible. And everything about her…I don’t know. Rhianna looks so sexy and relaxed. With Katy it’s like this latex, forced, dyed, pushing, eyes wide open, grunting…it’s not nice. She has a beautiful face but her whole look is just so forced. I don’t know how she keeps it up.

LOVE the blue dress in all its sparkling splendor, but girlfriend needs a bra! My boobs are very similar to Katy’s and that’s after a breast reduction, so if I wouldn’t go out without a bra, neither should she… My DDs need support! I also like her makeup, but that blue hair is awful! And, I’m in LOVE with the last outfit! WANT! Beautiful dress, awesome hat & cute makeup, but why did she have to ruin it with that hair? Urgh!