actually does the "celeron" count in mobile sang-chou-1 ?
if so you will be finally seeing Celeron Ivy Bridge CPU's at the same time they release Haswell in the first half of 2013.
regarding that " tiny beams could trap and manipulate particles as small as a few atoms." rather than just light i always thought we don't use sound enough in electronics and heres just such a rather cool fully working project
using Ultra Tangibles
Creating movable tangible objects on interactive tables ultrasound is focussed into a beam, creating enough force to move lightweight objects across a surface.
mesmerizing video fukk of potential :)
http://big.cs.bris.ac.uk/projects/ultratangibles
scale this down to the micro/nano scale and it could be a very usable commercial product to manipulate particles and perhaps even perform some assembly, what you think , would nano scale ultrasound destroy the graphene nanowires etc http://www.graphene-info.com/electron-conductivity-studies-graphene-nanowires at the quantum mechanical process level
along side some Twisted beams of light could increase the capacity of optical communications.
http://www.nanomagazine.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1908:twisted-beams-of-light-could-increase-the-capacity-of-optical-communications-technology&catid=38:nano-news&Itemid=159

actually does the "celeron" count in mobile sang-chou-1 ?
if so you will be finally seeing Celeron Ivy Bridge CPU's at the same time they release Haswell in the first half of 2013.
regarding that " tiny beams could trap and manipulate particles as small as a few atoms." rather than just light i always thought we don't use sound enough in electronics and heres just such a rather cool fully working project
using Ultra Tangibles
Creating movable tangible objects on interactive tables ultrasound is focussed into a beam, creating enough force to move lightweight objects across a surface.
mesmerizing video fukk of potential :)
http://big.cs.bris.ac.uk/projects/ultratangibles
scale this down to the micro/nano scale and it could be a very usable commercial product to manipulate particles and perhaps even perform some assembly, what you think , would nano scale ultrasound destroy the graphene nanowires etc http://www.graphene-info.com/electron-conductivity-studies-graphene-nanowires at the quantum mechanical process level
along side some Twisted beams of light could increase the capacity of optical communications.
http://www.nanomagazine.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1908:twisted-beams-of-light-could-increase-the-capacity-of-optical-communications-technology&catid=38:nano-news&Itemid=159

Intel's Finfet is best thing for foundry.
Intel keeps talking finFET but is not shipping 22nm FinFET products in mobile (feature-smart-phone or tablets) now or even next year.
After 2 years just 1 design is shipping(ivy bridge).
Achronix 22nm FPGA delayed until 2013
Haswell delayed to 2nd-half 2013
14nm delayed 1 year to 2nd-half 2014

Intel's Finfet is best thing for foundry.
Intel keeps talking finFET but is not shipping 22nm FinFET products in mobile (feature-smart-phone or tablets) now or even next year.
After 2 years just 1 design is shipping(ivy bridge).
Achronix 22nm FPGA delayed until 2013
Haswell delayed to 2nd-half 2013
14nm delayed 1 year to 2nd-half 2014

what , still no nano photonics devices in the pipeline, thats a shame,
if only someone made some Plasmonic Optical Tweezers Could Trap Tiny Proteins
An innovative aperture design based on plasmonics could focus light so effectively that tiny beams could trap and manipulate particles as small as a few atoms.
or we had a fiber optic spanner to adjust new Metamaterials and so Manipulate Light on a Microchip.
we probably need lots of sellotape ‘Smart’ Claw's
and OC the usual micron-scale spatial light modulator (SLM) that works in 3-D “free space” and runs orders of magnitude faster than those used in sensing and imaging devices today..
blah blah blah :)
did everyone at IEDM also forget Continuous gas-phase synthesis of nanowires with tunable properties
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11652.html

what , still no nano photonics devices in the pipeline, thats a shame,
if only someone made some Plasmonic Optical Tweezers Could Trap Tiny Proteins
An innovative aperture design based on plasmonics could focus light so effectively that tiny beams could trap and manipulate particles as small as a few atoms.
or we had a fiber optic spanner to adjust new Metamaterials and so Manipulate Light on a Microchip.
we probably need lots of sellotape ‘Smart’ Claw's
and OC the usual micron-scale spatial light modulator (SLM) that works in 3-D “free space” and runs orders of magnitude faster than those used in sensing and imaging devices today..
blah blah blah :)
did everyone at IEDM also forget Continuous gas-phase synthesis of nanowires with tunable properties
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11652.html

In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.