On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> >
> > If so, then extending or modifying "seamless" with more control over how
> > styles in the outer document affect the inner document seems like the
> > way to go.
>
> If this is a presentational desire, it may make sense to define
> seamless="" in part in terms of the CSS feature.
>
> Maybe "seamless" should be entirely a presentational feature, and not an HTML attribute at all.
It seems unusual to have a CSS property that only affects one particular HTML element.