Passing
a Federal Budget is a rarity, especially under the administration of a committed Marxist. The Democratic Senate’s strangle
hold on bringing up legislation, particularly a budget, goes without saying. What makes this new budget for 2013 any different?
This time the day of reckoning hits hard the first of the next year. The recent interview with David Stockman on the Fox Business channel with Neil Cavuto is an extraordinary analysis why the economy will absorb
a frightful tax increase all at one time. The fallout to commerce could become the real end of the world scenario. Take the
time and watch the insightful observations from a courageous number cruncher who served this nation with distinction during
the Reagan Presidency.

Bob Jennings in a written article from the same Fox News presents a written list that
coincides with the risks that Stockman outlines.

•Income tax exemption for debt forgiven on home foreclosures and repossessions

•Deduction for student loan interest ends

•Education
IRA limit drops from $2,000 to $500

Now these major tax
changes are alarming enough and make the case that an additional business slowdown is on the horizon, but the underlying fact
is that just continuing the current tax deductions never addresses the true causes that build in perpetual deficits.

The short-run
economic imperative was to identify as many campaign promises or high priority items that would spend out quickly and be inherently
temporary. … The stimulus package is a key tool for advancing clean energy goals and fulfilling a number of campaign
commitments.

2. Team Obama knows these deficits are dangerous
(although it has offered no long-term plan to deal with them).

Closing
the gap between what the campaign proposed and the estimates of the campaign offsets would require scaling back proposals
by about $100 billion annually or adding new offsets totaling the same. Even this, however, would leave an average deficit
over the next decade that would be worse than any post-World War II decade. This would be entirely unsustainable and could
cause serious economic problems in the both the short run and the long run.

3.
Obamanomics was pricier than advertised.

Your campaign proposals
add about $100 billion per year to the deficit largely because rescoring indicates that some of your revenue raisers do not
raise as much as the campaign assumed and some of your proposals cost more than the campaign assumed. … Treasury estimates
that repealing the tax cuts above $250,000 would raise about $40 billion less than the campaign assumed. … The health
plan is about $10 billion more costly than the campaign estimated and the health savings are about $25 billion lower than
the campaign estimated.

"I don’t particularly believe in tin foil hats, but all of these mainstream economists
treat the BLS and BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis), data like it’s holy writ—when it’s evident that the
reports are so massaged, estimated, deemed, revised, re-bench marked and seasonally adjusted that any month-to-month change
has a decent chance of being noise. What deep secret might they be hiding?

So
on the labor force participation rate they say, "No it didn’t go down in January because the 2012 numbers are re-bench
marked for the 2010 census," but for some reason the BLS didn’t bother to update the 2011 civilian population numbers,
including December. Thus, the BLS published apples-to-oranges numbers on this particular variable and the footnote says the
December participation rate would have been the same as January, if they had revised it.

But
the mainstream narrative never gets to the trend. In this case, the plain fact is that we are warehousing a larger and larger
population of adults who are one way or another living off transfer payments, relatives, sub-prime credit, and the black market.
My suspicion is that this negative trend and many others like it get buried by the monthly change chatter from mainstream
economists and on bubble vision, and that these monthly deltas are so heavily manipulated as to be almost a made-up reality.
Call it the economists’ Truman Show."

Folks, the federal budget will never
get into balance as long as the trade deficit continues. However, the military budget and the social transfer payments with
an aging society have the sharpest increase curve. When all the above tax benefits expire in 2013, the economy must contract.
A second Obama administration will think up even higher stimulus schemes.

David Stockman understands the worst is still
ahead. His advice is a sober warning to a political class of deficit spending addicts. Yet their record of rehabilitation
seldom includes the policy-making actions and commitment to make fundamental spending reductions. As long the fantasy delusion
continues, that everything will be all right and improvement is coming after the next election, no one will face the financial
reality. Listen to Stockman, before it is too late.