HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL BE MURDERED BY BLACKS TODAY?..........THE LOOTING ACROSS AMERICA is as black as the staggering murder and crime rates of BLACKS ACROSS AMERICA. Black Lives Matter? NO LIFE MATTERS TO BLACKS!

The cost of illegals to the
taxpayers of Arizona comes to $ 1.3 billion per year for education, Medicare
and incarceration. Even when the estimated tax contributions of illegals
workers are subtracted the amount still comes out to $1.3 billion EDUCATION: Arizonians
spend approx. $820 million annually on education for illegals. HEALTHCARE:
uncompensated medical outlays for healthcare provided to the states illegal
alien population is now estimated at about $400 million a year. INCARCERATION;
the cost of incarcerating the illegal aliens in Arizona prisons and jails
amounts to about $80 million a year, (not including the monetary costs of the
crimes that led to incarceration)

*

“Why are they not calling for a
boycott of Mexico? The truth is that Mexico is exporting, or at the very least
facilitating the export, of its poverty in the form of illegal immigrants to
the United States.”

*

HOW MUCH DOES THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION AND
EVER EXPANDING WELFARE STATE HAVE ON....:Why does "immigration reform" now demand a higher national
priority than the crippling unemployment that is devastating the economic base
and precipitating wide spread home foreclosures in our communities?

WHAT WE KNOW IS THAT THOSE STATES WITH THE HIGHEST
FORECLOSURES HAVE THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF ILLEGALS. LA RAZA DONORS WELLS FARGO
and BANK of AMERICA MADE MILLIONS IN FEES ON MORTGAGES THEY DELIBERATELY
MARKETED TO ILLEGALS WITH FRAUDULENT I.D., AND THE POOR. BECAUSE OF THIS WELLS
FARGO HAD LONG HAD THEIR CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE LICENSE REVOKED! THIS BANK SIMPLY
DECLARED ITSELF ABOVE THE LAW AND WENT ON EXPLOITING ILLEGALS AND THE POOR ALL
OVER THE COUNTRY! DIDN’T PREVENT THIS BANK FROM RECEIVING TAX PAYERS’ BAILOUT !
IN REP. DAN TANCREDO’S DISTRICT THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 10,000 MORTGAGES HELD
BY ILLEGALS THAT WERE FORECLOSED ON. BANKS KEPT THEIR PROFITS, STUPID GRINGOS
PAY FOR THE LOSES UNDER THE OBAMA BANKSTER BAILOUTS!

*

SOMEBODY CLOSE THE DOOR: Reactions to Arizona Immigration Law Misses the
Point

BY CLARENCE B. JONES

Scholar in Resident

Martin Luther King, Jr. Institute at Stanford University

A good doctor knows to treat the disease, not the symptoms.

In the discussion about the new law passed in Arizona directed at addressing
that state's problems associated with illegal immigrants from Mexico, the
protests concerning the legislation are directed at the wrong parties, in the
wrong direction. The pro-immigration community, some church groups and many
Civil Rights leaders are all calling for a boycott of the State of Arizona
based on their belief that the new Arizona law is focused on "racial
profiling" as the method for identifying possible illegal Mexican
immigrants.

We have the most sophisticated
surveillance and monitoring technology in history, the most formidable military
in the world, yet we are unable to stop the daily intrusion of illegal
immigrants from Mexico into the United States?

As an African-American who lived through and before the Civil Rights
Movement, I'm no fan of assessing people based on their skin color. But holding
a struggling State's feet to the fire on tactics is missing the point . Why are
protests not being directed to our national government and the government of
Mexico? Why aren't these groups demanding that our porous border with Mexico be
closed, once and for all? It's not impossible. We have the most sophisticated surveillance and monitoring technology
in history, the most formidable military in the world, yet we are unable to
stop the daily intrusion of illegal immigrants from Mexico into the United
States? This is a failure of policy, not one of capability.

Congress has been unwilling to pass an immigration bill, the first priority
of which is closing the border. Why does
"immigration reform" now demand a higher national priority than the
crippling unemployment that is devastating the economic base and precipitating
wide spread home foreclosures in our communities? President Obama said the
health reform was the first priority of his first term. Now, he is turning his
attention to financial reform of the banking system. Meanwhile, cities like
Phoenix and many cities in the State of California and elsewhere are drowning
in red ink with an ever-growing population demanding ever-more city services.

Arizona is now being depicted as the official state of "racial profiling,"
with anti-Hispanic and anti-immigration swirling around it like scarlet
letters. But the passage of its bill to prevent the continued influx and
presence of illegal immigrants in the State appears more like an act of
desperation than racially motivated legislation.

WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEM. THIS ENABLED THE RULING
BILLIONAIRE OLIGARCHY TO MAINTAIN THE ECONOMY IN THEIR GREEDY GRASPS. THINGS
DON’T MUCH CHANGE IN SHAMELESS MEXICO; ANY MORE THAN SHAMELESS WALL ST. MOST OF
THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS OF LA RAZA!

As such, it relieves the government
of Mexico from any financial responsibility for the economic consequences
associated with the cost of medical care, public education, public housing,
welfare, police, and social services provided by the cities, counties and
states in which such initially illegal immigrants choose to reside.

The pro-illegal immigration amnesty movement shuns the classification
"illegal" immigrant; preferring instead the term "undocumented
immigrant." This is, of course, framing the debate. The
"undocumented" immigrants entered into the United States illegally.
When apprehended, deportation back to their country of origin is the customary
legal procedure. Now, however, an intermediary process is advocated in lieu of
deportation: an undocumented immigrant who, after following certain prescribed
procedures, including the payment of taxes, will be permitted to remain in the
United States. This constitutes de facto amnesty for the "undocumented
immigrant." As such, it relieves
the government of Mexico from any financial responsibility for the economic
consequences associated with the cost of medical care, public education, public
housing, welfare, police, and social services provided by the cities, counties
and states in which such initially illegal immigrants choose to reside.

Well-intentioned people are quick to denounce Arizona and call for a boycott
of business transactions or travel involving the state. Why are they not calling for a boycott of Mexico? The truth is that
Mexico is exporting, or at the very least facilitating the export, of its
poverty in the form of illegal immigrants to the United States.

WHEN YOU HEAR OBAMA TALK ABOUT JOBS,
WHICH IS SELDOM, YOU CAN BET THE RANCHERO HE MEANS JOBS FOR ILLEGALS!

Any version of amnesty for illegal immigrants and efforts to organize a
boycott of Arizona will detract from the number one priority affecting
substantial segment of the American people: unemployment. Moreover, it will
blow a hole in the projected operating costs and budget deficit projections in
the new health care bill.

SHOULD MEXICO START PAYING FOR THEIR OWN WELFARE? HOW ABOUT THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE FINE ANY ILLEGAL THAT WAVES A MEX FLAG IN OUR FACES AND REFUSED TO SPEAK
THE GRINGO’S LANGUAGE? THAT ALONE WOULD BRING IN BILLIONS!

The annual cost of maintaining and
providing services to illegal or "undocumented" citizens should be
tabulated, assumed and paid by the Government of Mexico or credited against the
annual cost of oil we import from them until such time as immigrants from their
country become U.S. citizens.

Why don't the pro-amnesty undocumented immigrant leaders join forces with
the "anti-illegal immigration" leaders and bring the Government of
Mexico to the table? The annual cost of
maintaining and providing services to illegal or "undocumented"
citizens should be tabulated, assumed and paid by the Government of Mexico or
credited against the annual cost of oil we import from them until such time as
immigrants from their country become U.S. citizens.

Let's face it: right or wrong, the Arizona legislation is treating the
symptoms of an international disease that needs much stronger medicine.

*

NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED SINCE THIS ARTICLE IN 2006 ABOUT MEXICO
EXPORTING THEIR POOR. NOT MUCH BUT THE STAGGERING COST OF THE MEXICAN WELFARE
AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE!

The Mexican
Invasion................................................

Mexico prefers to export its poor,
not uplift them

March 30, 2006 edition

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html

At this week's summit, failed
reforms under Fox should be the issue, not US actions.

By George W. Grayson WILLIAMSBURG,
VA.

At the parleys this week with his
US and Canadian counterparts in Cancún, Mexican President Vicente Fox will
press for more opportunities for his countrymen north of the Rio Grande.
Specifically, he will argue for additional visas for Mexicans to enter the
United States and Canada, the expansion of guest-worker schemes, and the
"regularization" of illegal immigrants who reside throughout the
continent. In a recent interview with CNN, the Mexican chief executive
excoriated as "undemocratic" the extension of a wall on the US-Mexico
border and called for the "orderly, safe, and legal" northbound flow
of Mexicans, many of whom come from his home state of Guanajuato. Mexican
legislators share Mr. Fox's goals. Silvia Hernández Enriquez, head of the
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for North America, recently emphasized
that the solution to the "structural phenomenon" of unlawful
migration lies not with "walls or militarization" but with
"understanding, cooperation, and joint responsibility." Such rhetoric
would be more convincing if Mexican officials were making a good faith effort
to uplift the 50 percent of their 106 million people who live in poverty. To
his credit, Fox's "Opportunities" initiative has improved slightly
the plight of the poorest of the poor. Still, neither he nor Mexico's lawmakers
have advanced measures that would spur sustained growth, improve the quality of
the workforce, curb unemployment, and obviate the flight of Mexicans abroad.
Indeed, Mexico's leaders have turned hypocrisy from an art form into an exact
science as they shirk their obligations to fellow citizens, while decrying
efforts by the US senators and representatives to crack down on illegal
immigration at the border and the workplace. What are some examples of this
failure of responsibility? · When oil revenues are excluded, Mexico raises the
equivalent of only 9 percent of its gross domestic product in taxes - a figure
roughly equivalent to that of Haiti and far below the level of major Latin
American nations. Not only is Mexico's collection rate ridiculously low, its
fiscal regime is riddled with loopholes and exemptions, giving rise to
widespread evasion. Congress has rebuffed efforts to reform the system.
Insufficient revenues mean that Mexico spends relatively little on two key
elements of social mobility: Education commands just 5.3 percent of its GDP and
healthcare only 6.10 percent, according to the World Bank's last comparative
study. · A venal, "come-back-tomorrow" bureaucracy explains the 58
days it takes to open a business in Mexico compared with three days in Canada,
five days in the US, nine days in Jamaica, and 27 days in Chile. Mexico's
private sector estimates that 34 percent of the firms in the country made
"extra official" payments to functionaries and legislators in 2004.
These bribes totaled $11.2 billion and equaled 12 percent of GDP. ·
Transparency International, a nongovernmental organization, placed Mexico in a
tie with Ghana, Panama, Peru, and Turkey for 65th among 158 countries surveyed
for corruption. · Economic competition is constrained by the presence of
inefficient, overstaffed state oil and electricity monopolies, as well as a
small number of private corporations - closely linked to government big shots -
that control telecommunications, television, food processing, transportation,
construction, and cement. Politicians who talk about, much less propose,
trust-busting measures are as rare as a snowfall in the Sonoran Desert.
Geography, self-interests, and humanitarian concerns require North America's
neighbors to cooperate on myriad issues, not the least of which is immigration.
However, Mexico's power brokers have failed to make the difficult decisions
necessary to use their nation's bountiful wealth to benefit the masses.
Washington and Ottawa have every right to insist that Mexico's pampered elite
act responsibly, rather than expecting US and Canadian taxpayers to shoulder
burdens Mexico should assume.