I have to admit that I was not paying much attention to the bombardment of the city of Homs, Syria — now in its 25th day — before the deaths of two Western journalists there last week.

That is completely typical of me as a Western observer sitting comfortably at my desk, far from the tumult and terror of war.

I sat complacently at my desk during the bombardments of Sarajevo in the 1990s, and Baghdad in 2003-4. I was hardly aware of what was going on in Rwanda during the genocide there in 1994. Glimmers of awareness come and go about the current violence in the Congo, or in Burma.

For the most part, I go about my business like any animal would, focusing on what’s in front of me. As long as my belly is full and my personal security is not threatened, I can give a big yawn at the evening news, and go peacefully to sleep.

The attitude of the Western public — especially among Americans — rides the border between ignorance and indifference. We’d rather not know — so we focus our attention elsewhere, on news that either appears to concern us more directly, or has a more soporific effect.

Oscars, anyone?

Death of Whitney Houston — OMG what a tragedy!

And let’s check in with the Republican horse race, shall we? Will it be Santorum or Romney this week? Ho-hum…

Meanwhile, innocent civilians, many of them women, children and elders, are dying every day in Syria, just as they did in Sarajevo, Baghdad, Sudan, Libya … the list goes on and on.

That means we enable all these bloody wars. We build up dictators by selling them arms. Then when they misbehave and start killing civilians, we wring our hands and act as if we had nothing to do with their rise to power, hence no responsibility for their misdeeds.

If Americans were serious about wanting a peaceful world, we would start by converting our weapons manufacturing plants to peaceful purposes.

Instead of machine guns, let’s make solar panels and sell them to world leaders. Instead of tanks and jets, let’s export educational software and lightening-fast hardware.

Instead of sending military personnel to deal with civilians in other countries (as they did so ably last week, burning Korans in Afghanistan), let’s send teachers and doctors and enthusiastic, open-minded young people in every profession.

Americans need to understand that we bear a responsibility for the death of every child who dies as a result of a US-made weapon, no matter who wields it.

Giving up violence has to start with giving up the weapons that enable it.

Let’s dare to think outside the box, and put our hearts, minds, and bodies in the service of peace.

Related

1 Comments to “Up in Arms”

On the other hand, the USA could simply leave countries and their citizens to get on with their lives, day to day.
If that is not possible, American citizens and their representatives, could focus upon strategies of conflict prevention , and conflict resolution by talking and negotiation not by bombs and bullets.
The government could help to alleviate poverty across the globe by means of grant aid, medical aid, education aid, water aid and other charitable projects and not by capitalist exploitation.
It is easy to forget that 6 billion people are poor, trying to survive on less than $10 a day.
It is easy to forget that the USA is regarded by many as the ‘enemy’ not as the ‘friend’ of peace.

FOLLOW AND SUBSCRIBE

Latest Posts

GONE, NOT FORGOTTEN

Since launching in 2010, we featured many inspiring writers on cutting-edge issues. In times of escalating crises, we sought to remain proactive rather than perpetually reactive, to not give more power to those who would co-opt the agenda, and to try turning visions in practice. We can critique what is and offer insights into what could be, without becoming embittered in the process. We weren't partisan, but we'll always stand on the side of those who desire peace with justice. We're not posting anymore new content as of 2017, but our archive will remain up and you can still find us on social media. We'll see you in the interwebs...