When this Picture first appeared at Shmais.com it made
NO MENTION of being a spoof. There are NO Other "Spoofs" in the
Archives of Pics. It was not until Texe Marrs began broadcasting the PIC, when
they were alerted, they added the "Word" Spoof, to deceive the
masses. Too Late, he is REVEALED as a Talmudic Hassidic jew. I have read many
denials, which state that this Photo was photoshopped from another Pic. I
demand that any Man, Woman or Child, Produce the Original, or
forever...."Shut Up" the Documentation is rock solid, here on this
site of what they are about, I challenge any of you apostate Judeo-Churchinsanity
or Talmudic Jew to Dispute the Proof. Bush is of DAN of the Talmudic RED
Hassidim unto the beast Sanhedrin unto the Dragon the Murderer their father,
the son's of the synagogue of Satan, and is not a man of the LIVING LORD JESUS
who is the only Iam.

Peace by murdering wonderfully

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/715432.html

IDF has fired more than 5,100 shells at Gaza
in six weeks

Israel Defense Forces artillery batteries
deployed along the Gaza Strip border have fired more than 5,100 shells at
"launch areas" for Qassam rockets since March 31, mainly in northern
Gaza, according to the army's figures.

The IDF stepped up its response to Qassam rocket fire two and a half months
ago. Most of the artillery response consists of explosive shells fired by a
battery deployed near Kibbut Nahal Oz.

Southern Command officials claim that
the shelling has reduced the number of Qassam rockets fired at the Negev and,
more importantly, has reduced their accuracy. They say the missile operators
are afraid to remain in the targeted areas and therefore do not take the time
to aim the launchers precisely.

Five Palestinian civilians have been killed as a result
of IDF artillery in the past ten weeks, including a young girl and a teenager.

The pattern of Israel's shelling changes frequently. Usually, a heavy Qassam
bombardment will provoke a few hundred IDF shells within a 24-hour period, but
occasionally the shelling is suspended for some days.

The artillery shelling was initiated by former prime minister Ariel Sharon
shortly after the completion of the IDF's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in
September, though Sharon had been talking about the need for a beefed-up
response to Qassam rockets long before then.

The IDF has since reduced the distance of its artillery fire from Palestinian
homes and farmland, from 300 meters to only 100 meters. Several human rights
groups petitioned the High Court of Justice over the change, but the justices
refused to order a suspension of the shelling. Israelis living near the border
have also complained about the shelling, saying it does not help, and is only
scaring them and their children

after all anti-Shematism is necessary for the management
of the "lesser brethren", isn't it?

Over 100,000 people at an ancient Galilee
gravesite, bonfires throughout the country, a day of appreciation for
reserve soldiers - these & more mark the holiday of Lag BaOmer,
which begins tonight.

The minor holiday of Lag BaOmer - the 33rd
day of the Omer period between
the Pesach (Passover) and Shavuot (Pentecost) holiday - begins tonight. It marks
the anniversary of the death over 1,800 years ago of Mishnaic sage Rabbi Shimon
Bar Yochai, whose teachings comprise the text of the primary Kabbalah
sourcebook, the Zohar.

Blasphemy and sorcery

Of the well over 100,000 people expected to arrive by tomorrow at Rabbi Shimon's
gravesite in the town of Meron, west of Tzfat (Safed), many began making their
way north already last week. They will participate in traditional ceremonies
there, in keeping with a 500-year-old custom, including singing, dancing,
praying, sharing food with guests, and lighting bonfires representing the
"light of Torah" (False Illumination of Talmud
Bavli, Babylonian tradition which makes the Word of God of none effect)
disseminated by Rabbi Shimon and his teacher Rabbi Akiva. (Jack
Van Impe's favorite rib-eye)

In addition, many traditional "first haircuts" will be given to
3-year-old budding Torah scholars. (budding Talmudic
anti-Christ sorcerers)

The date also marks Bar Kokhba's revolt against the Romans, and the end of a
period of mourning for thousands of students of Rabbi Akiva, who died in a
plague at this time of year.

Israel's Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger, in his work B'Maagalei HaChayim, notes that
the custom of playing with bows and arrows on this day is "apparently
because tradition tied this date with the Bar Kokhba rebellion." One
tradition has it that Rabbi Akiva's students were the main force of Bar Kokhba's
army, which succeeded in defeating both Roman legions that were then in the Holy
Land, restoring Jewish independence for four years, and - according to many -
beginning to rebuild the Holy Temple. For more on the "failed Messiah"
Bar Kokhba, the spiritual/military war for independence, and Rabbi Akiva's role
in these events, see this
article by Rabbi Pinchas Stolper of the OU and NCSY.

As is customary each year, a parade of Torah scrolls will leave the city of
Tzfat today, and the celebrations will officially open when the procession
reaches Rabbi Shimon's gravesite.

Bonfires will also be lit by Jewish children all over Israel tonight.

fire unto Molech

The Fire Department warns the public to carefully guard their Lag BaOmer
fires, and has issued guidelines to this effect. The Jewish National Fund, the
IDF, and the police are on special alert to prevent fires from spreading, and
fire-fighting planes will be ready beginning this afternoon for this purpose.
Police and security forces are also on high alert for possible terrorist
attacks. Non-residents of the area are allowed to travel to and near Meron only
via public transportation.

The government recently decided to make Lag BaOmer a national day honoring IDF
reserve soldiers, in appreciation for their motivation and willingness to
"share the load." This will be the third year that soldiers serving in
reserves on this day receive free rides on Israel Railways and other benefits -
though Egged has discontinued its 50% bus fare discounts for reservists. A
letter of appreciation will be sent to each of the citizens who served actively
in the reserves over the past years, and attached to it will be a series of
discount coupons

Jewish Actor William Shatner, famous for his
role in the Star Trek series, plans to visit Israel in the coming weeks.

Shatner, whose parents immigrated to Canada from Ukraine, is visiting the Jewish
State as part of the Jewish National Fund's efforts to raise $10 million for
therapeutic riding centers across Israel.

Shatner enjoys breeding and showing American Saddlebreds and Quarter Horses and
has a 360-acre horse farm in Kentucky named Bellreve, where he raises the
winning horses.

The actor is excited about the construction of centers using riding as therapy
across Israel. One such center is located at Kibbutz Grofit. It offers
psychological evaluations and therapy designed to meet the needs of physically,
emotionally, and mentally handicapped children. The center, staffed by medical
professionals and using horses, runs the length of the school year, September
through July.

Shatner said he hopes to create cooperation on the project between Israelis and
Arabs from both the PA-controlled areas and the Hashemite
Kingdom in Jor-dan. "What better way to create
dialogue than by helping handicapped children from different countries feel good
about themselves?" Shatner said of the project

____

The Obedient "Goyim" Freemason
Noahide of Skull and Bones

FIRST PERSON

Holy Chutzpah: Rabbi remembers
his mentor, William Sloane Coffin

By Rabbi Or N. RoseMay 12, 2006

BOSTON, May 14 (JTA) — The first time I heard William Sloane Coffin speak
was at a memorial service for Abraham Joshua Heschel at B’nai Jeshurun
synagogue in Manhattan. As I listened intently to Coffin’s address, I thought
to myself, “That is the kind of rabbi I want to be someday.”

Of course, Coffin was not a rabbi, but a renowned Presbyterian minister.
Nevertheless, his eloquence, humor and chutzpah all greatly impressed me. I
quickly realized why he had been dubbed “the greatest white preacher in
America.”

The Rev. William Sloane Coffin died one month ago — April 12 — at the age of
81. In Jewish tradition, it’s customary to pay tribute to one’s teacher 30
days after his death.

Beginning with that day in Manhattan, I learned much more over the next
several years about Coffin’s singular contributions to American life: his work
as a chaplain at Yale University, as a civil rights “freedom rider” and as
an activist against the Vietnam War.

The more I learned about Coffin, the better I understood why he and Heschel
were such close friends. Like their colleague, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.,
both believed that as religious leaders they were obligated to work for social
change; both possessed what Heschel described as “moral grandeur and spiritual
audacity.”

But it was only this past winter that I actually met Coffin. I decided that
the best way for me to have a serious conversation with Coffin was to interview
him for Tikkun Magazine, for which I serve as a contributing editor. And so,
after reading as much as I could by and about him, I made a pilgrimage to
Strafford, Vt., where Coffin and his wife, Randy, were living.

When I arrived at the Coffin home, I was shocked to see just how weakened
Bill was from a stroke and other ailments. He sat in a tattered recliner, his
wilted legs covered by a heavy woolen blanket. He was much thinner than I
remembered him, and his speech was severely slurred.

One thing, however, remained the same: his spirit.

For the next two hours, Coffin spoke with great passion and precision — his
slurred speech required that he choose his words even more carefully than before
his stroke — about all of the great moral and spiritual issues of the day,
from abortion to the environment to interfaith relations. It was clear that
while he rarely left his living room, he continued to travel great distances in
his mind.

After completing the interview, Coffin insisted that I have a drink with him.
But he was concerned about me making it home before the Sabbath.

“What would ‘Father’ Abraham [Heschel] think if I caused you to violate
the holy Sabbath!” he exclaimed.

Over the next several months, I spoke regularly with Coffin by phone. At
first we worked together on editing the interview, but after a few calls we just
schmoozed, discussing his old age, my new marriage and the complications of
religious leadership and human frailty.

For the most part, I asked questions and he answered them. He was very
concerned that a new generation of religious leaders emerge that is passionate
about issues of social and environmental justice, members of the clergy who see
themselves not only as priests but as prophets. He felt there were too many
“old Turks” and “young fogies” in positions of religious leadership.

As we spoke, I always held a pen in hand, ready to record a quotation from
the likes of Reinhold Niebuhr or Albert Camus. Most precious to me were
Coffin’s own aphorisms, as he had the rare ability to formulate beautiful
poetic insights in the course of conversation.

The one that stands out in my mind during this period of mourning is, “The
only way to have a good death is to lead a good life. Lead a good one, full of
curiosity, generosity and compassion, and there’s no need at the close of the
day to rage against the dying of the light. We can go gentle into that good
night.”

Bill Coffin lived a good life — a life dedicated to justice and
righteousness, to love and peace. May his memory serve as a source of blessing
and inspiration to all those who seek to do the same — may his memory be a
blessing.

Rabbi Or N. Rose is director of informal education at the Hebrew College
Rabbinical School, and faculty adviser to Jewish Seminarians for Justice.

William Sloane Coffin, Jr. was born
into the wealthy elite of New York City. ...Coffin had
been a friend of George HW Bush since his youth, ...

William Sloane Coffin was not a
"preacher" of the LIVING God.

___

2 THES. 2:

1: Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2: That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us,
as that the day of Christ is at hand.

3: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not
come,

except there come a falling away first,

Global Noahide Proselytes, made two fold
the children of hell, Judeo-Churchinsanity

and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4: Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the
temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5: Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6: And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.

the Falling away Noahide concision, unto
the Dragon they worship, all whose names are not written in the Lambs Book of
Life....even so it is happening as birth

7: For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

leaven of the Pharisees the Hassidim of
Sanhedrin

8: And then shall that Wicked be
revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

Praise the Name of Jesus the Lord

9: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

10: And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.11: And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:12: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
13: But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
14: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15: Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
16: Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace,
17: Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

False Christ

http://www.yiddishkeit.org/Default_YK.asp?

Can Moshiach be Resurrected?

We begin our inquiry into the topic with the most legitimate part of
Torah Judaism one offer: the Talmud.

of the Dragon of Mystery Babylon, that Old satan

In the following fascinating Aggadic piece, several great sages present
their opinions as to whom the Moshiachwould be, were he to arrive in
their time. We now quote the great sage Rav, whose opinion is most
relevant to our discussion.

Rav states:

"If Moshiach will come from the living, it will be Rabeinu HaKadosh
(i.e.Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi), if he comes from the dead, it will be Daniel
(the Prophet)..."

Sanhedrin 98:B

Shocking as it may be for many, Rav seems to include those who have
already died (such as Daniel the prophet), as legitimate Messianic candidates.
Even more shockingly, no other sage in the Talmud seems to even take issue
with it.

Rashi's first interpretation (NOTE: It is well known that Rashi's
first interpretation is his favored interpretation) of this quote
provides further clarification of this point. Rashi restates Rav's
position as follows:

"This means, that if Moshiach were to come from those who are
living now, it will be Rabeinu HaKadosh…but if (Moshiach) is to come from
those who have died already, it will be 'Daniel Ish Chamudos'..."

Rashi-"Ee Min Chaya, Hu Kegon-Rabainu HaKadosh" 98:B

Considering the current climate among today's Jewry towards the notion of a
'Resurrected Redeemer', one might expect to find a plethora of Talmudic
commentaries questioning and analyzing how such an 'untraditional' suggestion
could be made. Yet, we find no such uproar. In fact, the opposite is
the case; not even a hint of disapproval or surprise can be found from amongst
the (at least twenty) major commentaries that discuss this page of Talmud.

The silence of these commentaries speaks volumes. The absence of any
objection made to Rav's statement or Rashi's interpretation of it, means that
among the true Torah sages of the Talmud, the notion that Moshiach could come
from the dead was always accepted and uncontested. This concept was far
from the source of indignation and imprecation it has become in our recent
history.

Mt:28:7: And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you.

If one source is not enough, other explicit references to the legitimacy of
a 'Resurrected Redeemer' are not difficult to come by. In his work
entitled, "Yeshuas Meshicho," Torah giant Rav Don Issac Abarbanel
writes as follows:

"Do not be amazed by the fact that that Moshiach can be one of
those who will rise in Techiya (resurrection), because this possibility was
already considered by our sages in Gemara Sanhedrin." (Iyun Sheni, Perek
Alef)

Mt:27:25: Then answered all
the people, and said,
His blood be on us, and on our children.

In the encyclopedic work of the Sedei Chemed, entitled "Pe'as
Sadeh" we find a similar theme. This highly authoritative work
contains the following quote:

"There are two ways the redemption may materialize…if the
Jews posses great merit, the advent of Moshiach will be of the miraculous and
spiritual order, as it is written in Daniel- 'Moshiach will arrive atop a
heavenly cloud'…concerning this possible manner of Moshiach's coming the
Gemara states 'if he comes from the dead it will be Daniel Ish Chamudos.'"

Mt:24:30: And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

Peas Sadeh-Maareches Alef, Os Ayin

Further support for this concept can be found in the Rambam. This is
notable, because the Rambam is one of the few Torah sages who compiled
comprehensive halachic qualifications Moshiach must fulfill. He,
therefore, is a distinctive authority to be used in determining what
disqualifies a messianic candidate. He writes as follows:

"And if he (the potential Moshiach) has not succeeded until
this point (compelling all the Jewish people to follow Torah ways, and
fighting the wars of Hashem) or is killed, it is assured that this is
not the one (Moshiach) about whom the Torah has promised..."

Jn:5:43: I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.

Jn:17:11: And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.

1Cor:1:15: Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

Mishna Torah-Hilchos Melachim/Laws of Kings 11:4

We now turn our focus to the Rambam's choice of words "...or is
killed...". The Rambam is well known for his precise
wording in the Mishne Torah. Many decisions, which drastically affect
lives, are made, based on a word or even a letter of the Rambam. Why is this
important to us? Because if it is true, as many critics claim, that Moshiach
can only come from the ranks of the living, the wording of this Rambam is
inexplicable. Allow me to explain.

Mt:27:31: And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to
crucify him.

If simply dying, in any way, disqualifies a potential Moshiach, then why
didn't the Rambam simply say: "If Moshiach dies"-then
he cannot be Moshiach? This would have disqualified all Messianic
candidates regardless of how they died. Apparently, to the Rambam
things are not quite so simple.

Rv:1:7: Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

In spite of the fact that the vast majority of Jewish history's righteous
sages died natural deaths, the Rambam chooses a highly limiting word-"killed"
as the invalidating criterion".

their self made scape goat

The clear implication here is that only if a potential
Moshiach is killed (such as Bar Kochba who lost his life in combat) is he
disqualified, but should such an individual die a
natural death-he remains a valid Messianic candidate. There is no other
coherent way to understand this Rambam.(NOTE: Obviously, all the other
criteria of the Rambam must be fulfilled as well in order to remain a
Messianic candidate. Questions regarding how these other criteria are
being fulfilled by the Rebbe will be dealt with in a later chapter: See
"The Rebbe and the Rambam")

see the Talmudic Hassidic Chabad Lubavitch RED Sofiet
Dragon worshipper, of the Bushwhacker Dan Aholah Clan in Washington DC and the
anti-Christ Noahide Laws of the "War President" to murder
wonderfully

From all the Torah sources quoted above, the following conclusion
becomes blatantly obvious:

While the concept of 'Moshiach from the dead' may be foreign in the eyes of
a great deal of today's Jewry, it is not so in the eyes of the Torah.

Talmud Bavli, after the working of Satan

And for a Jew, the Torah (Talmud Babylon)
view is the only one that need be consulted. We must place our trust in
the Torah, (Talmud of satan) not emotional
qualms, to guide us on this topic, just as we do with every other aspect of
our lives.

We begin our inquiry into the topic with the most
legitimate part of Torah Judaism one offer: the Talmud.

Mk:7:9: And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

Mk:7:13: Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

In the following fascinating Aggadic piece, several great sages
present their opinions as to whom the Moshiachwould be, were he to
arrive in their time. We now quote the great sage Rav, whose opinion is
most relevant to our discussion.

Rav states:

"If Moshiach will come from the living, it will be Rabeinu HaKadosh
(i.e.Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi), if he comes from the dead, it will be Daniel
(the Prophet)..."

Sanhedrin 98:B

Shocking as it may be for many, Rav seems to include those who have
already died (such as Daniel the prophet), as legitimate Messianic candidates.
Even more shockingly, no other sage in the Talmud seems to even take issue
with it.

Rashi's first interpretation (NOTE: It is well known that Rashi's
first interpretation is his favored interpretation) of this quote
provides further clarification of this point. Rashi restates Rav's
position as follows:

"This means, that if Moshiach were to come from those who are
living now, it will be Rabeinu HaKadosh…but if (Moshiach) is to come from
those who have died already, it will be 'Daniel Ish Chamudos'..."

Rashi-"Ee Min Chaya, Hu Kegon-Rabainu HaKadosh" 98:B

Considering the current climate among today's Jewry towards the notion of a
'Resurrected Redeemer', one might expect to find a plethora of Talmudic
commentaries questioning and analyzing how such an 'untraditional' suggestion
could be made.

For two thousand Years these hassidic acidic
Pharisaic Vipers denied a resurrected REDEEMER by the Talmudic
"Replacement Theology" Now, they seek another risen, But the One who
comes in his own name is after the Working of Satan, that Man of Sin, son of
perdition, their Moshiach which is No Christos, No Savior, just a simple anointed
by their wretched oil flesh man, who will certainly do the Lust of His father
the Murderer from the Beginning, and he will slay wonderfully by his
anti-Christ Noahide Peace unto the Dragon they all seve............REPENT in
the Name of the ONLY IAM, One God O Israel, Jesus is the Alpha and Omega, the
FIRST and the Last, the Almighty God.

Yet, we find no such uproar. In fact, the opposite is the case; not
even a hint of disapproval or surprise can be found from amongst the (at least
twenty) major commentaries that discuss this page of Talmud.

The silence of these commentaries speaks volumes. The absence of any
objection made to Rav's statement or Rashi's interpretation of it, means that
among the true Torah sages of the Talmud,

Prophets of Baal

the notion that Moshiach could come from the dead was always accepted and
uncontested. This concept was far from the source of indignation and
imprecation it has become in our recent history.

And Jesus the Christ the Risen Lord, has always been
denied by these anti-Christ Hassidic Chabad Pharisees, and now Judeo-Churchinsanity
are leavened by the yeast infection of the Great Harlot Mother of Mystery
Babylon of the earth

If one source is not enough, other explicit references to the legitimacy of
a 'Resurrected Redeemer' are not difficult to come by. In his work
entitled, "Yeshuas Meshicho," Torah giant Rav Don Issac Abarbanel
writes as follows:

"Do not be amazed by the fact that that Moshiach can be one of
those who will rise in Techiya (resurrection), because this possibility was
already considered by our sages in Gemara Sanhedrin."
(Iyun Sheni, Perek Alef)

In the encyclopedic work of the Sedei Chemed, entitled "Pe'as
Sadeh" we find a similar theme. This highly
authoritative work contains the following quote:

"There are two ways the redemption may materialize…if the
Jews posses great merit, the advent of Moshiach will be of the miraculous and
spiritual order, as it is written in Daniel- 'Moshiach will arrive atop a
heavenly cloud'…concerning this possible manner of Moshiach's coming the
Gemara states 'if he comes from the dead it will be Daniel Ish Chamudos.'"

Daniel writ of the Son of Man,
Jesus the Only Messiah, the ONLY Everlasting Covenant

Peas Sadeh-Maareches Alef, Os Ayin

Further support for this concept can be found in the Rambam. This is
notable, because the Rambam is one of the few Torah sages (Talmudic
Prophets of Baal) who compiled comprehensive halachic
qualifications Moshiach must fulfill.

Global anti-Christ Noahide enforcement, to slay the
Saints of Christ Jesus, who Stand fast and Testify of the ONLY Living GOD the
Creator, who fear not him who can merely slay the flesh, But who Fear HIM who
can destroy both the flesh and the Soul forever, the LORD Liveth.

He, therefore, is a distinctive authority to
be used in determining what disqualifies a messianic candidate. He
writes as follows:

Rev. 13:1: And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2: And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion:
and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

"And if he (the potential Moshiach) has not succeeded until
this point (compelling all the Jewish people to follow Torah ways, (Talmudic
satan Worship) and fighting the wars of Hashem) (Murder
for the Dragon)or is killed,
(Crucified) it is assured that this is not the one (Moshiach) about
whom the Torah (Anti-Christ Talmud of Babylon)
has promised..."

Mishna Torah-Hilchos Melachim/Laws of Kings 11:4

We now turn our focus to the Rambam's choice of words "...or
is killed...". The Rambam is well known for his
precise wording in the Mishne Torah.

Mishnah Torah of Talmud Bavli, is NOT THE WORD OF GOD

Many decisions, which drastically affect lives, are made, based on a
word or even a letter of the Rambam. Why is this important to us? Because if
it is true, as many critics claim, that Moshiach can only come from the ranks
of the living, the wording of this Rambam is inexplicable. Allow me to
explain.

go ahead lord "j"

If simply dying, in any way, disqualifies a potential Moshiach, then why
didn't the Rambam simply say: "If Moshiach dies"-then
he cannot be Moshiach? This would have disqualified all Messianic
candidates regardless of how they died. Apparently, to the Rambam
things are not quite so simple.

E=MC2

In spite of the fact that the vast majority of Jewish history's righteous
sages died natural deaths, the Rambam chooses a highly limiting word-"killed"
as the invalidating criterion".

For the Ram Bam thank you Man of the Great Harlot
Mother of all the earth, Hates the LORD who they Crucified, and lead all the
PEOPLE to Err and to Deny the Lord of Host, the Lord God Almighty the Creator,
the WORD from the beginning the Redeemer from the foundation of the World

The clear implication here is that only if a potential Moshiach is
killed (such as Bar Kochba who lost his life in combat) is he disqualified,
but should such an individual die a natural death-he remains a valid Messianic
candidate.

Such as that Man of Sin, Schneerson

There is no other coherent way to understand this Rambam.(NOTE: Obviously, all
the other criteria of the Rambam must be fulfilled as well in order to remain
a Messianic candidate.

But no Criteria from GOD regarding his Lamb the
Savior of All Mankind whose names are written in the Lambs Book of Life, who
was slain from the Foundation of the World, according to his Promise of
eternal Redemption unto all who Believe, by Faith, Given Freely by Grace

Questions regarding how these other criteria are being fulfilled by the
Rebbe will be dealt with in a later chapter: See "The Rebbe and the
Rambam")

From all the Torah (Talmud Babylon)
sources quoted above, the following conclusion becomes blatantly obvious:

While the concept of 'Moshiach from the dead' may be foreign in the eyes of
a great deal of today's Jewry, it is not so in the eyes of the Torah. (Talmud)
And for a Jew, the Torah (Talmud of tradition
which makes the WORD of God of none effect) view is the
only one that need be consulted. We must place our trust in the
Torah, (Talmud of Satan) not
emotional qualms, to guide us on this topic, just as we do with every other
aspect of our lives.

Will Moshiach be Resurrected?

Until now we have merely proven that, according to the Torah, Moshiach can potentially
be a 'Resurrected Redeemer'.

who will come in his OWN Name, and Not the Name of
GOD, the Iam

However, many might find it interesting to note that several Torah sources
would seem to indicate that not only can Moshiach die and be
resurrected before he redeems the Jewish people, but that the process will
necessarily be so.

oooooooops! to late................

Philosophical Divide

We are now left with only one remaining objection: "How does this
affect the philosophical lines of demarcation between
Christianity and Judaism". Many ask: "Isn't accepting the
notion of a resurrected redeemer ceding a critical point to the Christian
faith?"

hahhahahhahhahhahhahahhaha, for two thousand years
they denied a Resurrected Redeemer, Now they bring their own, in his Own name,
after the working of Satan

The answer, in simple terms, is as follows: The fact that
Christianity has espoused the concept of a resurrected Messiah bears
absolutely no relevance to how we,
as Jews, decide a Torah matter.

Thus by their exalted authority of their dragon by
Talmud Bavli, they cry out "Give us the Robber"
Give us Abaddon to be king over us

Would we stop putting on Tefillin if the Christians started doing it
too? Of course not. By this logic we would actually be forced to abandon the
concept of Moshiach entirely, as it is an undeniable pillar of both the
Christian and the Muslim faiths.

Fortunately, Judaism has never been defined by its nonconformity with other
religions, but rather by the Written and Oral Torah given to Moses by G-d at
Sinai.

Oral Fables of the jews, They hold nothing to the
Written Word of God, but to Talmud Bavli which was only the tradition put to
paper well AFTER the Crucifixion of Christ the LORD.....their "Replacement
Theology" unto another redeemer, who cannot REDEEM the soul, but only
make them as flesh wannabe gods, then everlasting Shame of shem's sham

The Torah ensures that the boundaries of our religion never become
blurred. It is specifically when we veer from its path, and begin to decide
issues on our own, that we run into trouble. And the fact remains, that our
Torah (Talmud) substantiates the notion of a
'Resurrected Redeemer'.(After the working of Satan)
Once this has been established, no other factors need be considered.

wanna beit?

__________

The sick Perversion of the
Sanhedrin and their Catholicos of Talmud Bavli

http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/

May 15, 2006

Godol Rabbi Pinchas Scheinberg: If He Did Not
Penetrate The Boy, There Is NO Sex Abuse According To The Torah

The Rabbi Yehuda Kolko child sexual abuse lawsuit has hit the big time,
and so has the man most responsible for bringing this creep to justice: Unorthodox
Jew. The New York Magazine has a long
feature on man-on-boy sex
abuse in the haredi community.

Thus you see the Bushwhacker Yale, Skull
and Bone connection

Highlights:

1. Rabbi Pinchas Scheinberg, a now senile 'gadol' living in Jerusalem,
was brought in during an earlier crisis in the 1980s by Kolko's backers
to scare off the accusers and their families. Scheinberg allegedly told
the families that, if Rabbi Kolko did not
penetrate your son, it is not abuse according to the Torah, (Talmud
Bavli of the Dragon) and pulicly
exposing Rabbi Kolko violates the laws of lashon hara, and you must not
do it.

for if you expose the sons of satan's shemmyGoG
they will surely want you dead...dead....dead

2. Abuse is so widespread that Hella Winston, author of the Unchosen,
met dozens of haredi men who were abused or who knew someone who was.

3. Gedolim, including Rabbi Scheinberg, have allegedly been covering up
this abuse for years.

4. Both Agudath Yisroel and Torah U'Mesora are alleged to be part of the
coverup.
5. The Brooklyn Attorney General defers to local beit dins, and fails to
prosecute haredi abusers.

6.The beit dins themselves are corrupt.

7. Chabad advocates for sexual abuse victims have been prevented
from making presentations in Chabad yeshivot.

8. A Chabad man-on-boy abuse victim is quoted in the article.

9. The laws of mesira (informing), lashon hara (talebearing)
and hillul Hashem (desecration of God's name) are frequently
cited by rabbis, including gedolim, to silence accusers and victims.

for they have exalted themselves as gods

10. The community does not protect its children from predatory rabbis.

I ask readers in Jerusalem to do the right thing. Go to Rabbi
Scheinberg's yeshiva in Mattersdorf and demand an answer. Anything less
than a complete apology, spit in the senile bastard's face.

Kol HaKavod to UnOrthodoxJew
for risking everything to bring down these creeps. You have saved lives.

_______

Moshiach & Moshaich

http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/

Menorah Safety Recall

M & M's menorah is being recalled
because the plastic base is a fire hazard. If you have one of these,
MasterFoods will return your money, plus shipping, and also give you a $10
gift certificate.

People, Parents, please be aware and keep an eye out for such activity, these
people disguise well and they know how to talk "nicely" KEEP AWAY
FROM THEM.

Last night I noticed on my doorstep 2 inconspicuous books and at first glance
I thought that they were ArtScroll Seforim that someone had left so I bent
down to pick it up and how shocked I was to discover in both Hebrew and
English written "הברית
החדשה" and "New Testament". Here
is a picture.

Please make sure that no one has accidentally brought these books into your
home unknowingly, they are what the Rebbe once referred to certain books as
"Bomb's in you House" so get rid of them in a way that none can come
to harm by them.

I want to warn you all to please be careful whom your kids talk to and talk to
you kids and warn them, and if you see such activity don’t hesitate to call
Shomrim @ 718-774-3333

Missionary material is being dispersed to homes of Crown Heights' residents.
COL has received warnings of several Crown Heights residents to alert the
public to this. If you are approached with this material, make sure to tear it
up and to alert the Shomrim patrol
to take care of these intruders

_______

Oh
how the hassidic mystical masters of mayhem who say Lucifer is Jesus the Christ,
hate the saints of the LIVING GOD

http://www.thelowestroom.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=632

thelowestroomSite Admin

Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 1016

Posted:
Mon May 15, 2006 7:10 am
Post subject:

Oh, and a 1000 years.........

2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be
not ignorant of this one thing,
that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand
years as one day.

So be not ignorant of it!. Satan was loosed after a
"DAY". Ya wanna go see him 'loosed', you can hear him
ALL DAY long, just go to......

Ps 118:24 This is the day
which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.

Thats trumpeted on the top of every page!!!. Satans princes of
darkness are ALL AROUND YOU.
_________________
Jason Guenther - Administrator

andyb

Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 2

Posted:
Mon May 15, 2006 3:53 pm
Post subject:

Jason, I
think you may be doing a disservice to newcomers or lurkers by posting
those links.

whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeeeeey

Thank you Lord Jesus. Of course they
demand you obey Buswhacker and his murders. Of course it incenses them that the
saints of Jesus the Christ exposes the Beast Sanhedrin, for they have already
declared that Lucifer is Jesus their lord. This is about as good as it gets for
these.

2 Pet.3:2: That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:
3: Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own
lusts,
4: And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep,
all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5: For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store,
reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

2
Thes. 2:

1: Now we beseech you, brethren

, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,
2: That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.
3: Let no man deceive you by any
means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and
that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4: Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that
he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing
himself that he is God.5: Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6: And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7: For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8: And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10: And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11: And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
13: But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:
14: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15: Therefore, brethren, stand
fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
16: Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace,
17: Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

__________

All the kings of the earth are drunken with the
Great Harlots Iniquity

US Aggression-Time
Once Again: Target Iran
By Edward S. Herman and David Peterson
CounterPunch.org
5-14-6

With the United States having
initiated wars in violation of the UN Charter, and hence engaged in the
"supreme international crime,"1 against Yugoslavia, Afghanistan,
and Iraq in 1999, 2001, and 2003, one might have expected that its
commencement of a fourth aggression only a few years later against Iran
would arouse the UN, EU, other international institutions and NGOs, and even
the supposedly moral and independent Free Press, to serious protest and
counter-action, including referral to the UN Security Council under Chapter
VII's "threat of peace" articles and support of possible
diplomatic and economic sanctions. This has not happened, and in fact the
Bush administration has successfully mobilized the UN, whose "primary
responsibility" is the "maintenance of international peace and
security," and the EU, as well as the Free Press, to facilitate its
fourth attack.

We say that the fourth
aggression is already underway, because once again, as in the Iraq case, the
United States has been attacking Iran for many months, and not just with
verbal insults and threats. It has been flying unmanned aerial surveillance
drones over Iran since 2004; it has infiltrated combat and reconnaissance
teams into Iran "to collect targeting data and to establish contact
with anti-government ethnic minority groups" (Seymour Hersh);2 it has
bestowed an ambiguous "protected" status upon the Mujahedin-e
Khalq, a group which, since 1997, the U.S. Department of State has
designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization, but a group that the Washington
regime now uses to launch cross-border attacks on Iran from within
U.S.-occupied Iraq;3 and it and its Israeli client have repeatedly
threatened larger scale and more open attacks. This pre-invasion aggression
was an important feature of the overall aggression against Iraq, where the
US and British greatly increased their "spikes of activity" with
massive bombing well before the March 19, 2003 invasion4-major acts of war
and aggression begun as early as April 2002, that were almost wholly ignored
by the Free Press and "international community."

What is mind-boggling in all
this is that new attacks and threats by a country that is in the midst of a serial
aggression program, that runs a well documented and widely condemned global
gulag of torture,5
that has committed major
war crimes in Iraq-Fallujah may well replace Guernica as a symbol of
murderous warfare unleashed against civilians6-and
that openly declares itself exempt from international law and states that
the UN is only relevant when it supports U.S. policy,7 is not only not
condemned for its Iran aggression, but is able to enlist support for it in
the EU, UN and global media. This enlistment of support occurs despite the
further fact that it is now generally recognized that the Bush and Blair
administrations lied their way into the Iraq invasion-occupation (but still
quickly obtained UN and EU acceptance of the occupation and ensuing ruthless
pacification program),8 and that they cynically misused the inspections
program, all of which makes the new accommodation to the
aggression-in-process and planned larger attack truly frightening.

The mechanism by which this is
accomplished by the aggressor state is to cry-up an allegedly dire threat
that Iran might be embarking on a program to obtain nuclear weapons-it might
be doing this secretively, and although it has submitted itself to IAEA
inspections for the past three years, it has not been 100 percent
cooperative with the Agency.9 Combining this with demonization,10 intensive
and repeated expressions of indignation and fear, and threats to do
something about the intolerable threat, the
Washington regime has managed to produce a contrived "crisis,"
with huge spikes in media attention and supportive expressions of concern
and actions by the UN, IAEA, and international community.11 These groups
join the aggressor partly to avoid offending it, but also to try to
constrain its determination to get its way-but in the process they accept
its premises that there is a real threat and hence give at least tacit
support to its aggression program, and sometimes more. On the home front,
with the acceptance of the seriousness of the manufactured crisis by the
mainstream media and Democrats, and with leading politicos like Hillary
Clinton and Evan Bayh even egging Bush on, the noise creates its own
self-fulfilling pressures on the leadership that manufactured the crisis,
who now must "do something" about it to avoid political loss.12

This time, the
EU appears to be cooperating even more fully in the developing aggression
against Iran than it did in the Iraq case. Although Iran has an absolute and
"inalienable" right to enrich uranium under NPT rules (i.e., the
NPT's sole condition is that the enrichment can only be "for peaceful
purposes"), and
although the NPT imposes upon other parties to the treaty the obligation to
"facilitatethe fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and
scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear
energy,"13 under British, French and German urging Iran, in November
2004, agreed "on a voluntary basis to continue and extend its
suspension to include all enrichment related and reprocessing
activities," while these states agreed to continue negotiations in good
faith for the sake of an agreement that "will provide objective
guarantees that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively for peaceful
purposes," and "firm guarantees on nuclear, technological and
economic cooperation and firm commitments on security issues."14

But subsequent stages of
negotiations foundered mainly because the three EU states could not provide
Iran with guarantees on security-related issues without also securing U.S.
guarantees for the same-and not only were U.S.
guarantees never forthcoming, but Washington and Israel escalated their
threats instead.
Moreover, it is the
longstanding U.S. position that "no enrichment in Iran is
permissible," in
the words of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton. "The
reason for that," he added, "is that even a small so-called
research enrichment program could give Iran the possibility of mastering the
technical deficiencies it's currently encountering in its program. Once Iran
has the scientific and technological capability to do even laboratory size
enrichment, that knowledge could be replicated in industrial-size enrichment
activities elsewhere, that's why we've felt very strongly that no enrichment
inside Iran should be permitted, and that remains our position."15 In
short, the United
States unilaterally refuses to allow Iran its rights granted it by the NPT.

Now some 18 months later, a
U.S.-led consortium of states has introduced a draft resolution within the
UN Security Council with the intent of imposing upon Iran a deadline for
terminating all indigenous "enrichment-related and reprocessing
activities" (pars. 1-2), as well as calling on all states to prevent
the transfer of the technology and the expertise "that could contribute
to Iran's enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and missile
program" (par. 4)-thereby
following the U.S. lead and criminalizing Iran's and only Iran's pursuit of
its "inalienable" rights under Article IV of the NPT, and treating
Iran's otherwise legal, NPT-sanctioned enrichment program as a Chapter VII
threat to international peace and security.
Equally striking, this draft resolution also expresses the Security
Council's "intention to consider such further measures as may be
necessary to ensure compliance with this resolution" (par. 7).16 This
is exactly the kind of phraseology that, if adopted, the Washington regime
would have be eager to interpret as a use-of-force type resolution,
regardless of whether other members of the Security Council went along with
it.

We regard the terms of this
draft resolution as well as the general thrust of British, French, German,
and European Union diplomacy on the Iranian nuclear issue to be a perfect
accommodation to the needs of the aggressor state, which openly denies Iran
its "inalienable" rights under NPT rules.
This also constitutes
a death-blow-by-politicization to the NPT and a gross abuse of the functions
and powers of the Security Council, all in deference and service to a
program in violation of the most basic principle of the UN Charter-that all
members "shall settle their international disputes by peaceful
means" and refrain from the "threat or use of force" (Article
2).

Bushwhacker and Hassidic Neo-Conmen Chabad
Lubavitch are international criminals and Murderers, simple as that

Since the spring of 2003, U.S.
power has produced a steady and indignant focus on Iran's alleged
foot-dragging on inspections. As in the case of Iraq's failure through March
2003 to prove that it did not possess any "weapons of mass
destruction" (WMD), the U.S.-driven allegations and inspections regime
channeled through the IAEA have focused on Iran's parallel failure to
disprove a negative-namely, that Iran prove that it is not secretly engaging
in practices that are prohibited under the NPT and subsequent Safeguards
Agreement (May 15, 1974) and the Additional Protocols (signed December 18,
2003, though only observed "on a voluntary basis"). Moreover,
throughout the current 38-month cycle of allegations and inspections to
which the IAEA has now subjected Iran, the IAEA has repeatedly adopted a
phraseology to the effect that the IAEA is "unable to confirm the
absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities inside Iran"-an
inherently politicized condition that no state would be capable of meeting,
no matter what it agreed to do, and whose application depends ultimately on
the strength of the political forces that pressure the IAEA to continue the
search.17 With enough political pressure, no amount of
"transparency" and "confidence-building" measures on the
part of the accused state can meet it, as was evident in the Iraq case. And
as long as the IAEA reports that it is unable to confirm the absence of
undeclared nuclear material and activities inside Iran, Iran is helpless
before the IAEA's negative condition.

The "threat" and
crisis have been sustained in the media by the use of patriotic and
fear-mongering frames and suppressions of relevant fact that may even be
more brazen and misleading than those justifying the invasion of Iraq. The
crisis-supporting frames are: (1)
that Iran is a dangerous theocratic state, with an irrational and unstable
political and clerical leadership that has supported terrorists and
threatened Israel and is therefore not to be trusted with a nuclear program;
(2) that it has been secretive about its nuclear program, has not been fully
cooperative with the inspections program of the IAEA, and that the reason
for this secrecy is Iran's intention to develop nuclear weapons; (3) that
its acquisition of a nuclear weapons capability would be intolerable, would
destabilize the Middle East if not the whole of Western Civilization, and
must be stopped.

In sustaining these frames it
is necessary to suppress major facts, such as:

(1) that there is no proof
that Iran plans to go beyond the civilian uses of nuclear materials to which
it is entitled under the NPT and the IAEA has never claimed that it has
evidence of such weapons efforts or plans;

(2) that both the United
States and Israel possess large and usable nuclear arsenals,18 and both have
attacked other countries in violation of the UN Charter, which Iran has not
yet done;

(3)
that Iran is far less dangerous than Israel and the United States because it
is very much weaker than the two that threaten it, and could only use
nuclear weapons in self-defense-offensive use would be suicidal, which is
not the case should the United States and Israel attack Iran;

(4) that Iran was secretive
about its nuclear program because it recognized that the United States and
Israel would have opposed it bitterly, but Iran at least did sign up with
the NPT and has allowed numerous intrusive inspections, whereas
Israel was allowed to develop a nuclear weapons program secretly, with U.S.,
French and Norwegian aid, refused to join the NPT, and remains outside the
inspections system;19

(5) that both
the United States and Israel are virtual theocratic states, profoundly
influenced by religious parties whose leaders are arrogant, racist, and
militaristic, and who have posed persistent threats to international peace
and security;

Judeo-Churchinsanity, Fallen away to the beast
Sanhedrin

(6) that both the United
States and Israel have supported terrorists on a larger scale than Iran
(e.g., Posada, Bosch and the Cuban terrorist network, the Nicaraguan
contras, Savimbi and UNITA, the South Lebanon Army, among many others); and

(7) that it is the United
States and Israel that have destabilized the Middle East, by aggression and
ethnic cleansing in violation of international law and by forcing a huge
imbalance in which only Israel is allowed nuclear weapons among the
countries of the Middle East, a condition which allowed Israel to invade
Lebanon and enables it to ethnically cleanse the West Bank without threat of
retaliation.

A first alternative-frame that
might be used but is not to be found in the mainstream media is based on the
fact that, year-in and year-out, the United States has been a chronic
violator of the NPT's Article VI requirement that all parties "pursue
negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of
the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a
treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective
international control." In the context of the U.S.-driven accusations
about Iran's violations of the NPT, it is worth emphasizing that in a 1996
decision by the International Court of Justice, the fourteen judges on the
Court ruled unanimously that "There exists an obligation to pursue in
good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear
disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international
control."20 The
United States has brazenly ignored this ruling, refusing to countenance any
form of disarmament or international control over its sovereign rights on
questions of war and peace, openly working on improving its nuclear
weapons,21 and even threatening to use them against Iran.22

Hence the United States not
only has unclean hands, but its own illegal policies and threats pose a
clear and present danger that the UN and international community should be
addressing right now. Furthermore, not only is Iran not an immediate threat,
but given the U.S. threat to Iran and the U.S. refusal to work toward the
elimination of nuclear weapons and to pledge non-use against nuclear
weapons-free countries like Iran,
Iran has a moral right to try to acquire such weapons for self-defense.
Noting what the Americans had done to a nuclear-weaponless Iraq in 2003, the
Israeli historian Martin van Creveld has written,
"Had the Iranians not tried to build nuclear weapons, they would be
crazy."23

You do not own a gun. The
local police are supposed to make certain you do not own a gun, they cannot
"Prove: you do not own a Gun, but you must "prove" you do not
own a Gun. How do you "prove" you do not own a Gun? The local
Police Own Guns, the sherrif owns guns, they are to stop you from owning
that Gun, you cannot prove you do not own, By force if "necessary"
they say....see branck Davidians and Ruby Ridge.......you are sold out to
Murderers and blasphemers apostate Amaraka. Dan controls you through and
through

This point is reinforced by a
second alternative frame: namely, that the United States is using the Iran
nuclear threat as a gambit closely analogous to the WMD claim that
it employed as the lying rationale for the invasion-occupation of Iraq.
As before, the gambit is a cover for a desire to force a "regime
change" in Iran to make it into another amenable client state.

Noahide enforced state of Eretz
Itsrealhell, or else shem's collective
punishment will incur

This is sometimes even openly
acknowledged, and helps explain the frenzied threat-inflation and artificial
creation of a crisis that can be used as the pretext for an attack and
possibly produce turmoil and political change in Iran. It also helps us
understand the continual U.S. refusal to negotiate with Iran and/or to offer
a security guarantee in exchange for possible Iranian concessions on its
nuclear plans.

The same process occurred in
the run-up to the Iraq invasion-the United States inflated the threat,
created a crisis, refused to negotiate with Iraq, and would not allow
inspectors to complete their search for WMD allegedly because of the dire
threat, but more plausibly because of a longstanding U.S. determination to
engineer a regime change.

then the "War" announced "Purim
Eve" March 17, 2003

As noted, the mainstream media
(Talmudic controlled)
have followed the party line on the Iran "crisis" and failed
almost without exception to note the problems and deal with matters raised
in the alternative frames. Remarkably, despite their acknowledged massive
failures as news organizations and de facto propaganda service for the Bush
administration in the lead up to the Iraq invasion,24 with the
administration refocusing on the new dire threat from Iran it took the
mainstream media no time whatsoever to fall into party-line formation-from
which they have not deviated. Thus, they never go into the U.S. violations
of its NPT obligations, never discuss international law and its possible
application to U.S. pre-invasion aggression and threats of open attack, just
as they ignored the subject in reference to the Iraq invasion.25 They never
challenge the threat-inflation or consider any possible Iranian right of
self-defense. (We may recall that the Free Press was able to make an almost
completely disarmed Guatemala a frightening threat back in 1954, as well as
the badly weakened Iraq in 2002-3.)

But they do succeed to raise the ire and
Bloodlust cry of the Talmudic Judeo Leavened Apostate Churchinsanity

The media never suggest
that the United States may be abusing the inspections process-never harking
back to its abuses and outright lying as regard the Iraq inspections
effort-and they never suggest ulterior motives for the aggressor.

In treating EU, UN and IAEA
responses, the media never suggest that the real problem is containing the
United States. In the comical version offered and hardly contested in the
media, it is often suggested that there is a threat of
"appeasement" of Iran, and that if the world is "to avoid
another Munich," and the "Security Council fails to confront the
Iranian threat," it
is up to the United States to "form an international coalition to
disarm the regime."26
But there is never a hint that the problem might be appeasement of the
United States. Or that the applicable Munich analogy might not apply to the
Iranian nuclear program at all, as the 1938 Pact among the European powers
that impelled Czechoslovakia to accept the cession of the Sudetenland to the
Nazis is analogous to the ongoing UN and EU role in facilitating the designs
the United States is pursuing toward Iranian territory.27

Pravda could not have done a
better job for any planned Soviet venture abroad than the Free Press is once
again doing for the Bush administration.

The Bushwhacker bloody hassidic ad-menstruation

Conclusion

It is clear that when it comes
to actions that the superpower (or its leading client states) chooses to
take, international
law is completely inoperative,
and that this has become institutionalized and accepted by the
"international community" (which doesn't include the global
underlying population).

The Noahide Nations, anti-Christ murderers of
their father the murderer from the beginning

In the case of Iran, it is as
if the lessons of the recent past, and even of the ongoing present in Iraq,
simply disappear, and similar imaginary "threats" and misuse of
supposedly neutral international bodies like the IAEA and its
"inspections" can be re-run in a miasma of hypocrisy. In fact, as
we have noted, the situation has deteriorated, with the UN and EU now
playing an active aggression-supportive role, following the U.S. lead in
denying Iran its "inalienable"
rights under the NPT and making its pursuit of those rights into a
criminalized "threat to peace," setting the stage for a more
direct U.S. attack.

Our conclusion is twofold.
First, given the U.S. and Israeli possession of nuclear weapons, their
threat to possibly use them in attacking Iran, and the record of both
countries in major law violations such as the U.S.
violation of the UN Charter prohibition of aggression and the Israeli
violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention on obligations of an occupying
power, and given the fact that the Washington regime is already in the early
phases of aggression against Iran, the UN and Security Council should be
urgently focusing on the U.S. aggression instead of some minor inspection
delinquencies on the part of Iran (and it goes without saying, instead of
giving positive aid to the aggressor's program).

Second, if there is a concern
over violations of the NPT, far more important than Iran's deficiencies are
the U.S. failure to undertake any measures to eliminate nuclear weapons and
its protection of Israel as the sole nuclear power in the Middle East, and
remaining outside IAEA jurisdiction. In fact, the
United States is improving its nuclear arsenal with the express intention of
making nuclear strikes more "practicable."
As these threaten Iran as well as many other countries, common sense
dictates that this
violation of the NPT is vastly more important than any attributable to
Iran-real or imaginary.

In a decent and sane
world, bringing the U.S. violations of the NPT and its nuclear improvement
actions before the UN and Security Council ought to have a very high
priority, second only to stopping the U.S. aggression already underway
against Iran and which threatens an enlargement of the conflagration begun
by its prior and still raging "supreme international crime" in
Iraq.

Edward S. Herman is Professor
Emeritus of Finance at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, and
has written extensively on economics, political economy and the media. Among
his books are The Real Terror Network, Triumph of the Market, and
Manufacturing Consent (with Noam Chomsky).

David Peterson is is an
independent journalist and researcher.

Endnotes

1. "To initiate a war of
aggressionis not only an international crime; it is the supreme
international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains
within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." See "The Common
Plan or Conspiracy and Aggressive War," in Judgment of the
International Military Tribunal for the Trial of German Major War Criminals,
part of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials website maintained by the Avalon
Project at Yale Law School.

2. Seymour Hersh, "The
Iran Plans," New Yorker, April 17, 2006.

3. See "Foreign Terrorist
Organizations," Ch. 8 of Country Reports on Terrorism 2005, U.S.
Department of State, April, 2006, pp. 30/212 31/213. On the U.S.
Government's decision in July 2004 to grant "protected" status to
the MEK members semi-permanently encamped at Ashraf in eastern Iraq, see
"Daily Press Briefing," Adam Ereli, Deputy Spokesman, U.S.
Department of State, July 26, 2004. As the spokesman for Tehran's Foreign
Ministry noted in reaction, "The United States is using its fight
against terrorism as a tool, and we knew from the beginning that this fight
is void and they are not serious. Using the Geneva Convention to protect
this terrorist group is naive and unacceptable." "U.S. war on
terror is a sham, says Iran," Daily Times (Pakistan), July 28, 2004.

4. See Matthew Rycroft,
"The secret Downing Street memo," July 23, 2002 (as posted to the
Times Online, May 1, 2005); also Michael Smith, "The war before the
war," New Statesman, May 30, 2005; Michael Smith, "General admits
to secret air war," Sunday Times, June 26, 2005; David Peterson,
"'Spikes of Activity'," ZNet, July, 2005; and David Peterson,
"British Records on the Prewar Bombing of Iraq," ZNet, July, 2005.

5. Jonathan Steele and Dahr
Jamail, "This is our Guernica," The Guardian, April 27, 2005; Mike
Marqusee, "A name that lives in infamy," The Guardian, November
10, 2005.

7. At a symposium in 1994
titled "Global Structures: A Convocation: Human Rights, Global
Governance and Strengthening the UN," the current U.S. Ambassador to
the United Nations John R. Bolton stated: "The United States makes the
U.N. work when it wants it to work, and that is exactly the way it should
be, because the only question -- the only question -- for the United States
is what's in our national interest? And if you don't like that, I'm sorry.
But that is the fact." See Nomination of John R. Bolton, Hearing before
the Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, April 11, 2005.

8. The blood spilled during
the criminal U.S. and U.K. military seizure of Iraq had yet to dry before
the UN Security Council placed its stamp upon the occupation with a litany
of scramble-for-Iraq resolutions, beginning with Resolution 1483 (May 22,
2003), lifting economic sanctions that dated all the way back to Resolution
661 (August 6, 1990).

10. On demonization, see David
Peterson, "The Language of Force," ZNet, January 16, 2006.

11. For some recent opinion
surveys of American beliefs and attitudes, all of which, in the manufactured
crisis of the moment, find Iran and Muslims to be grave threats to
Americans, see Jeffrey M. Jones, "Americans Rate Iran Most Negatively
of 22 Countries," Gallup, February 23, 2006; Joseph Carroll,
"Americans Say Iran Is Their Greatest Enemy," Gallup, February 23,
2006; Claudia Deane and Darryl Fears, "Negative Perception Of Islam
Increasing," Washington Post, March 9, 2006; and "States of
Insecurity," Atlantic Monthly, April, 2006.

12. On the American Democratic
Party not only "not differ[ing] significantly from the
administration," but " trying to outflank the administration by
being even more hardline," see Anatol Lieven, "There is menace in
America's policy of prevention," Financial Times, March 20, 2006 (as
posted to the website of the New American Foundation). The lunatic (though
still counterfactual) scenario laid out by Timothy Garton Ash in "The
tragedy that followed Hillary Clinton's bombing of Iran in 2009" (The
Guardian, April 20, 2006), is imaginable in the first place only because in
the democratically crippled American political system, what are marketed as
alternatives remain captive of the reigning de facto consensus.

13. Here quoting Article IV of
the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (effective March 5,
1970).

14. See the copy of the
agreement between the E3/EU and Iran signed in Paris on November 15, 2004,
as reproduced in INFCIRC 637, IAEA, November 26, 2004, pp. 3-4.

15. Quoted in "No uranium
enrichment 'permissible' for Iran-US envoy," Agence France Presse,
March 6, 2006. Note that we can find no entry for Bolton's remarks on the
website of the United States Mission to the United Nations, e.g., under
Press Releases, January - March, 2006. Also see David Peterson,
"Overthrowing the NPT the American Way," ZNet, March 7, 2006..

16. For the actual text of the
draft resolution as it existed on May 3, see "TEXT-UN council gets
draft text on Iran nuclear program," Reuters-AlertNet, May 3. And for
reporting on the May 3 draft, see, e.g., Elaine Sciolino, "U.S.,
Britain and France Draft U.N. Resolution on Iran's Nuclear Ambitions,"
New York Times, May 3; "UN Security Council considers action on Iran's
nuclear programme," UN News Center, May 3; John Ward Anderson and Colum
Lynch, "U.S. Crafts Response on Iran," Washington Post, May 3;
Maggie Farley, "Security Council Gets Iran Nuclear Resolution,"
Los Angeles Times, May 4; Warren Hoge, "Britain and France Press U.N.
to Oppose Iran Nuclear Efforts," New York Times, May 4; Column Lynch,
"Security Council Is Given Iran Resolution," Washington Post, May
4; Edward Alden and Caroline Daniel, "US pushes for Iran financial
sanctions," Financial Times, May 8. Also see Marjorie Cohn's "Bush
Setting up Attack on Iran," Truthout, May 8.

17. To quote the latest
installment in the IAEA's series of reports to its Board of Governors (at
least the 17th overall), "the Agency is unable to make progress in its
efforts to provide assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear
material and activities in Iran." Implementation of the NPT Safeguards
Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran (GOV/2006/27), April 28, 2006,
par. 33, p. 7. IAEA-channeled allegations about the Iranian nuclear program
have been formulated in this manner since the very beginning.

18. For a current assessment
of the U.S. nuclear stockpile, see Robert S. Norris and Hans M. Kristensen,
"U.S. nuclear forces," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
January/February, 2006; and for Israel's, see Robert S. Norris et al.,
"Israel nuclear forces, 2002," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
September/October, 2002.

19. For a history of Israel's
development its nuclear weapons, entirely outside the NPT and international
controls, see Avner Cohen and William Burr, "Israel crosses the
threshold," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June, 2006; and
"Israel Crosses the Nuclear Threshold," National Security Archive
Update, April 28, 2006.

20. See Legality of the Threat
or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, July 8, 1996,
pars. 98 103, and Opinion F. Although an "advisory opinion," and
thus not legally binding on states, to date this counts as the most
authoritative legal decision to have been produced on issues stemming from
the existence of nuclear weapons and states' obligations under the NPT.

21. On U.S. plans to upgrade
its already peerless nuclear stockpile and the means of delivering it, see
James Sterngold, "Upgrades planned for U.S. nuclear stockpile,"
San Francisco Chronicle, January 15; Walter Pincus, "U.S. Plans to
Modernize Nuclear Arsenal," Washington Post, March 4.

22. On the potential U.S.
threat to use nuclear weapons against Iran-a case in which even so much as a
hint or a whisper of threat is deafening, and leaked warnings about such
threats even louder-see Hersh, "The Iran Plans," New Yorker, April
17, 2006; Sarah Baxter, "Gunning for Iran," Sunday Times, April 9,
2006; and Peter Baker et al., "U.S. Is Studying Military Strike Options
on Iran," Washington Post, April 9, 2006. Also see the material
reported under the "Divine Strake" entry on the Weapons of Mass
Destruction webpage of GlobalSecurity.org.

23. Martin van Creveld,
"Sharon on the warpath: Is Israel planning to attack Iran?"
International Herald Tribune, August 21, 2004. However, it should be pointed
out that neither the United States, IAEA, nor the European powers have given
any evidence that Iran's claim that it is only seeking the peaceful use of
atomic energy is not valid.

24. The classic case having
been "The Times and Iraq," New York Times, May 26, 2004; and the
accompanying webpage The Times devotes to this topic, "The Times and
Iraq: A Sample of the Coverage," May, 2004. Though we add the caveat
that the documents contained herein, and the conclusions affirmed by The
Times about the role that it played during the build-up for the invasion,
grossly understate The Times's real culpability.

25. Howard Friel and Richard
Falk, The Record of the Paper: How the New York Times Misreports US Foreign
Policy (London: Verso, 2004). In 70 editorials on Iraq between September 11,
2001 and March 21, 2003, The Times editors never once mentioned
international law. See chapter 1.

26. Nile Gardiner and Joseph
Loconte, "The Gathering Storm Over Iran," Boston Globe, May 3.
Conversely, usage of the false Munich analogy and the charge of
"appeasement" abounds. See, e.g., "Iran's Nuclear
Challenge," Editorial, Washington Post, January 12; William Kristol,
"And Now Iran; We can't rule out the use of military force,"
Weekly Standard, January 23; and Kim Willsher, "'Only a fraction of
Teheran's brutality has come to light'," Daily Telegraph, March 19.
This last example was particularly revealing. In it, Maryam Rajavi,
described as the "leader of the largest exiled Iranian opposition
group," the National Council for Resistance for Iran, reportedly
"says Western governments must end their 'dangerous appeasement' of
Iran's regime and recognise the worth of her group." Unmentioned is the
fact that the U.S. Government (officially, anyway) includes her group along
with the Mujahedin-e- Khalq on its list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
See note 3, above.

27. The Iran gambit could be a
cover for a partial invasion-occupation of the geographic region of Iran
where in the words of the U.S. Department of Energy the "vast majority
of Iran's crude oil reserves are located," that is, "in giant
onshore fields in the southwestern Khuzestan region near the Iraqi
border." Contrary to popular myth, this would not entail going
"all the way to Tehran," as a saying attributed to the
Neoconservatives has it, but only as far as the greatest concentration of
Iran's proven oil reserves extend, where southeastern Iraq borders Khuzestan.
See "Iran," U.S. Energy Information Administration, January, 2006,
p. 2. As this same report adds, "in September 2005, several bombs were
detonated near oil wells in Khuzestan, raising concerns about unrest amongst
ethnic Arabs in the region" (p. 2).

Have you lost your ability to THINK, apostate
Amaraka?

_________

Passing their Children through the
fire unto Moloch

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/716211.html

Last update - 23:38 15/05/2006

Man, 20, seriously burned at Lag Ba'omer
bonfire

By Eli Ashkenzi, Haaretz Correspondent ,and Itim

A 20-year-old man was seriously burned all over
his body Monday after pouring gasoline on a bonfire in Bnei Brak during Lag
Ba'omer festivities.

The man, who attended a religious ceremony of Lag Ba'omer, was burned when his
clothes caught on fire as he poured the flammable substance.

As myriads of Jews gather at the tomb of the
ancient mystic Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai in the Galilee village of Meron,
Arutz Sheva has kicked off its 5-camera live broadcast from the holy
site.

Arutz Sheva's live webcast will run from 6 PM Monday until 8 PM Tuesday (11
AM Monday – 1 PM Tuesday, EST). A small charge to help cover the costs of this
unique event is required for viewing. The broadcast includes views from inside
the burial cave, the courtyard - and even from the air. Click
here to register for the broadcast.

The non-stop 24-hr. celebration of the Jewish holiday Lag B'omer is perhaps the
largest-attended Jewish celebration in the world, attracting
Jews of every stripe and type: secular, religious, Sephardic, Ashkenazic,
Hassidic, and Litvak.

While bonfires (To Moloch) are lit on Monday night
across the country, those at Meron will participate in traditional ceremonies,
in keeping with an age-old custom, including singing, dancing, praying, sharing
food with guests, and lighting bonfires representing the "light of
Torah" disseminated by Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai [AKA Rabbi Shimon] and his
teacher Rabbi Akiva.

The holiday of Lag BaOmer - the 33rd day of the
Omer period between the Passover and Shavuot (Pentecost) holiday - marks the
anniversary of the death over 1,800 years ago of (Talmudic)
Mishnaic sage Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, whose teachings comprise the text of the
primary Kabbalah sourcebook, the Zohar.

Among the celebrants will also be Israel National Radio's Yishai and Malkah
Fleisher, whose live English radio broadcast from the site can be heard on IsraelNationalRadio.com
from 9 PM until midnight Israel time (2-5 PM EST).

The date, the 18th of the Jewish month of Iyar, also marks Bar Kokhba's revolt
against the Romans, and the end of a period of mourning for thousands of
students of Rabbi Akiva, who died in a plague in the preceding 32 days.

For they rebelled against GOD

Background on Rabbi Shimon
To fill the spiritual vacuum left by the death of his students, the great Rabbi
Akiva chose a select 5 men to pass over the secrets of the Torah to. Rabbi
Shimon Bar Yochai stood out amongst them and eventually wrote the secrets
of the Torah – the Kabbalah – in his work, the holy Zohar.

Perversion and fables of their "Tradition"

Recognizing that no other mortal would understand the full depth of the secrets
contained in the Zohar, Rabbi Akiva comforted his student Rabbi Shimon saying,
"It's enough that I and your Creator recognize your strengths and
powers."

Dark Sentences

Rabbi Shimon's Funeral
When Rabbi Shimon passed away, many communities demanded that the holy (Perverted)
sage be interred in their local graveyard. Jewish legend records that when the
funeral began, a ring of fire
encircled Rabbi Shimon's coffin, which proceeded to propel itself like a
hovercraft to the hillside of Mt. Meron in the Galilee. All understood that this
site was to be the sage's final resting place.

When Rabbi Shimon's son, Rabbi Elazar later passed away, he was living in the
village of Akbara. The Jews of the town left his body in an attic for 22 years,
during which no deaths, sicknesses, or tragedies befell the town. They dared not
move his body, nor enter the attic.

Fables of the jews

However, after 22 years, Rabbi Shimon appeared to select people instructing them
to bring his son, Rabbi Elazar, to be interred next to him in Meron. The Jews of
Akbara refused to comply with the request, recognizing Rabbi Elazar's resting
place as a source of great blessing. On Yom Kippur eve when the town folk were
busy preparing for the holiest day of the year, the select few who had been
charged by Rabbi Shimon to transfer his son, removed the body from the attic and
brought it to Meron.

At the entrance of Rabbi Shimon's burial cave, a great
serpent stood on guard. The pallbearers
told the serpent, "Move aside and allow us to deliver the son to his
father." The serpent moved aside, only to return to its guard upon
their departure from the cave.

The actual entrance to the burial cave was later sealed, and no one has accessed
it since. According to Rabbi Shraga Shnitzer of Ohel Rashbi institutions, the
few instances in which people tried to reach the burial chamber ended in
tragedy.

Miracles At the Site
It has been an age-old Jewish
tradition to pray to G-d (Dragon) at
the burial site of Rabbi Shimon and his son Elazar. (Of
the dead) In addition, many traditional "first haircuts"
are given to 3-year-old children at the site.

Five hundred years ago, the famed commentator to the Mishna Rabbi Ovadiah
Bartenora writes that many men and women who were not able
to bear children were blessed with offspring after visiting the site and making
a pledge.

At the end of his Hebrew-language
Arutz Sheva interview, the aforementioned Rabbi Shraga Shnitzer of Ohel
Rashbi institutions tells of another miracle at the tomb to which he was an
eye-witness.

There was once a 3-year-old child who had a fever of 41 Celsius (105.8 F). The
child could not move. That Friday was Lag B'omer and the father, himself a
master of the Torah and the Kabbalah, (sorcery)
decided to take his son to Meron to give him his "first haircut" and
pray for his recovery.

The mother panicked at the idea and brought a doctor to convince the father that
the child should not be disturbed. The doctor explained that the child was in
serious danger in his bed, and that moving him would endanger him more. Against
the advice of all present, the father ordered a cab and left with his sick son
for Meron at 7 A.M. that morning.

When the father and son returned from the tomb of Rabbi Shimon at 4 P.M, all the
neighbors were gathered at their home to comfort the mother as she anxiously
awaited their arrival. As the cab pulled up, a tense quiet overtook those
gathered. The cab door swung open, and the child came running out joyously into
his mother's arms.

Arutz Sheva's Yoni Kempinski asked Rabbi Shnitzer: "You were an eyewitness
to this scene?"
Rabbi Shnitzer: "That child was none other than me."

Under oath of Kol Nidre, he testifies of himself

Israel's Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger, in his work B'Maagalei HaChayim, notes that
the custom of playing with bows and arrows on Lag B'omer is "apparently
because tradition tied this date with the Bar Kokhba rebellion."

Nimrod

One tradition has it that Rabbi Akiva's students were the main force of
Bar Kokhba's army, which succeeded in defeating both Roman legions that were
then in the Holy Land, restoring Jewish independence for four years, and -
according to many - beginning to rebuild the Holy Temple. For more on the
"failed Messiah" Bar Kokhba, the spiritual/military war for
independence, and Rabbi Akiva's role in these events, see this
article by Rabbi Pinchas Stolper of the OU and NCSY

setting up yet another failed Moshiach in Moloch
rituals of Mystery Babylon

We
need help alerting the World who will listen. If you are a complacent apathetic
Apostate Amarakan fence sitter, I highly recommend that you go into the
Lowestroom of arrogant pride and return to the Vomit of Noahide Law, where they
worship the Dragon

.
Are you one who comes here to understand, Day by Day, and yet you refuse to
tell others? We have told you before, these hats and shirts are for one
purpose and one purpose alone, and that is to get the word out regarding the
Noahide Satanic laws of the Hassidim Vipers and them who agree with them the
proselytes of that Old Dragon and the serpent and satan, who say that he is
GOD.

If
you disagree, then move on to another site which fits you

r fits of
fancy.....................and "adios" to them who say "It aint
gonna happen"r fits of
fancy.....................and "adios" to them who say "It aint
gonna happen"