pete340 wrote:I'm not deeply concerned with people who can't read a message title correctly. "Novel in 3 days"? What a wimp!

Well, I wouldn't be so harsh on anybody about that. In fact, it's very hard to assimilate that a novel can be written in one day, whereas on the other side, it's common knowledge that any novel cannot take longer that three days to be written. Hence the source of confusion. ;-)

I'd like to run that thought by JRR Tolkien or George RR Martin just to see what either has to say about the length of time to write a novel being only 3 days. Hmmmmm. I'll have to hold a Séance for the one, however. Wonder if he'll show?

r6d2 wrote:. . . it's common knowledge that any novel cannot take longer that three days to be written. Hence the source of confusion. ;-)

BTW, I've just finished reading the novel. It was a real pleasure to enjoy it all, and see how things actually did manage to fit.

I didn't get Gallagher on my chapter, so I resorted to a reference "in absence". I see now that I was not alone. But of all the nice suit references, I'd like to say that I enjoyed the Alfred joke the most (by Victoria). Just both brilliant and funny.

I'm also glad to have found out that, fortunately, none of the gambles I took (when adding stuff of my own to the script) ended screwing up the story ;-)

What a funny, enjoyable and fruitful experience this has been. In fact, a good subject for a future novel indeed.