<a href=”http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1768489/” mce_href=”http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1768489/”>If you were stuck on a deserted island, which would you rather have as potential “romantic” company?</a><span style=”font-size:9px;” mce_style=”font-size:9px;”>(<a href=”http://www.polldaddy.com” mce_href=”http://www.polldaddy.com”>poll</a>)</span> Can’t see the poll? Click here to take it.

If we are on a dessert island, and that hot girl that is with me is not initially interested in me, will eventually become interested, because I would be the only man there with her.

Sooner or later her hormones will send her to my side. She has no alternative, plus, I am good loooking myself!

0

| Reply - Share

Manage Subscriptions ∨

Participate in this discussion via email

eflick

6 years 18 days ago

I chose the person because you can have romance without sex. a person to keep me company on a romantic trip would always be more satisfying than a sex toy.

0

| Reply - Share

Manage Subscriptions ∨

Participate in this discussion via email

Molly

6 years 20 days ago

I think this question depends a lot on how satisfied you can be through masturbation without props. If your two hands are all you need, then you might as well have the person around. If masturbation without props doesn’t do it for you, or you hate the idea of sex with someone who isn’t attracted to you at all, then bring on the sex toys.

I’m pretty sure that my interest in sex would dry up if I were completely isolated from human beings and the media.

0

| Reply - Share

Manage Subscriptions ∨

Participate in this discussion via email

Dannie

6 years 21 days ago

At least a person would provide company. Being alone with just a sex toy on an island would get old fast–there’s more to life than sex. Even if they don’t want sex from you, you could have a good friend/companion and help. And you always have your own two hands to…er…take care of -other- needs if they don’t break down…