Searcy Law Blog

Why Should Class Action Matter to You?

According to a bill pending in the House of representatives, class actions are bad for you and multi-district litigation is not your friend. HR 985 is an example of our legislators acting out of complete ignorance or an effort to pay back big contributors like corporations and insurance companies.

If I make widgets intended to be installed in humans for medical reasons, the standard of care for that manufacturing requires a high degree of care for obvious reasons. I am making a profit from a device that can hopefully help treat injured or ill patients. And, that is all a good thing.

Defective Products = injured people

If I start manufacturing the widgets from an inferior grade of material because I can make them at a reduced cost, but sell them at the higher cost I have been, you expect competition to help control that. But, because my patent on the widget will prevent competitors from making a widget of their own, I have many years to rake in the profits. Still not necessarily a bad thing – maybe a little greedy, but, hey its capitalism.

If the inferior material I decided to use to reduce my cost per widget make people sick, what is to be done?

This is a case perfect for what is called a class action or for multi-district litigation (MDL). Why?

A large number of people will have been injured or killed by the decision to use inferior materials in the widget.

The evidence required to prove the materials used were inferior and the widget was defective will be the same for everyone.

The evidence required to prove the widget caused the injuries or deaths will be the same or similar for everyone.

The most efficient method of handling these types of cases is NOT to force a 1000 individual lawsuits; to go through the extraordinary expense of discovery in each; or to stretch the capabilities of the court’s by trying all 1000 cases individually.

Congress, however, in its infinite wisdom, believes consumers would be better off if they pass what they are calling “Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017”.

By any estimation, this bill will result in consumers having the courthouse doors slammed shut.

The residual effects will be to increase health insurance premiums; increased unemployment claims; increases in Medicare and Social security disability claims and other effects; since people must seek payment of health costs, lost wages and disability compensation from other than the negligent party.

It is a bad and unnecessary bill that has no potential to result in “fairness”

Go tohttps://democracy.io/#/to find your representatives and send them a message you want your rights upheld and to vote no on H.R. 985.

Personal injury attorneys ready to fight for you.

* This amount represents gross verdicts and settlements obtained on behalf of clients over the last 40 years, without adjustment for fees, costs, or medical liens. In some cases, verdicts were amended or appealed, or were not fully recoverable due to the insolvency of defendants. The accounts of recent trials, verdicts and settlements contained in this website are intended to illustrate the experience of the firm in a variety of litigation areas. Each case is unique, and the results in one case do not necessarily indicate the quality or value of any other case. Omitting clients' names and/or defendants' names are the result of requests for anonymity.

We partner with a third party ad network to either display advertising on our Web site or to manage our advertising on other sites. Our ad network partner uses cookies and Web beacons to collect non-personally identifiable information about your activities on this and other Web sites to provide you targeted advertising based upon your interests. If you wish to not have this information used for the purpose of serving you targeted ads, you may opt-out by clicking here (Link to TRUSTe global opt-out: http://preferences.truste.com/). Please note this does not opt you out of being served advertising. You will continue to receive generic ads.