Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December 10th
2009. Newcomers, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
That’s the official web site and on there you’ll see all the other official
sites I have up there. Anything you see on the net outside of these are
not mine. Bookmark the alternate sites for future use in case the big
servers go down; they’ve done that in the past a few times. That way you
can get the latest shows, the audios, for download right away. [Sites
listed above.]

Remember,
that you are the audience and that you bring me to you five nights a
week. This is a full time… It’s more than an occupation; it’s not a
job either. It’s more that that. We
are going through the most tremendous changes in history. We’re
going through the culmination of really of a couple hundred years of strategy
and planning and it’s all happening right now as the world is being transformed
into a new structure and authority… for the next THOUSAND years, literally,
which will affect everything. It’s up to you to keep me going and you can
find out how to purchase the items I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com
and you can donate to me as well. [Options listed above.] It’s up
to yourselves how you want to do it; it ends up in the same place anyway.
Some of these instant wiring systems are more costly than others so check them
out for yourselves or you can just send cash. For those who get disks
burned and passed to them of the talks I’ve given and this happens all the time
at little meetings all over the planet - that I hear about afterward generally
- you can get in touch with me at [address above] and that should get to me
without any problems whatsoever. One thing about the mail, they’re very
good, even when they open it sometimes, they still make sure that everything
comes through. I know when they open it because they put a bundle in the
box - all at the same time, that they’ve held up for a week - with a rubber
band around it. I’m the only person in the area that gets it that
way, but that’s the world we live in.

It’s
a totalitarian new system where we’ve been told we have a NEW FREEDOM.
George Bush Jr said that; he’s introducing the NEW FREEDOMS. It was never
asked by any reporter anywhere what he meant by this legal declaration - and it
was a LEGAL DECLARATION - what the new freedoms were. It’s odd that the
reporters never ask the obvious isn’t it? It’s like when his dad came out
with the ‘new world order’ on September the 11th 1990, no one says,
‘well what do you mean by new world order; what does it mean?’ No
one asked him that question; they just winked in that old Masonic way.
Back with more after this break.

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt. This is Cutting Through The Matrix.
It’s interesting when you look at recent history really, since about World War
II onwards. You can go before that too and I have gone into that before,
into the past, ancient past, middle and up to the present. It’s good to
see how things really don’t seem to transpire by themselves. It’s good to
see how BIG organizations WORK on cultures and population and geo-politics to
get them all ready for the next phase, the next wave they’re going to
bring the populations through into this global agenda.

For
the last 100 years, and before that, great plans and great powers were at work
to destroy the cultures that really were called ‘first world countries’ at that
time. They knew, even before they set up the League of Nations that
became the United Nations, that to bring in their idealized, totally controlled
society, world wide, that they’d have to destroy any part of a culture and any
culture which was not all-inclusive in its particular way of viewing
others. That went for religions too. Any religion which was not
all-inclusive of everyone else’s religion HAD TO BE destroyed and they’d
replace it, they said, eventually with a form of pantheism. It’s called
New Age today. They started that on a big roll since the 1930s BUT before
that too even in the 1800s with Madame Blavatsky. She was on the
go. She was set out to try and introduce the blending of the cultures
especially of India with that of the West. They had a plan THEN that
eventually they would open up the floodgates from India, under a British
Commonwealth system, for interchange of population. So anyone who has a
sort of exclusive culture or has an exclusive believe that they believe is the only
real belief there is to have, has to be literally put down by any means
possible, eventually just blacklisted and banned if need be, outlawed in
fact.

A
lot of these changes were done by what people thought were grassroots movements
and political movements, generally called the left. Now many of the left
wing followers became true believers in this great utopic idea they had.
It seemed to make sense to them that everyone should be the same, etc, etc, etc
without even thinking first if everyone is the same, that means even their own culture
has to be pretty well destroyed in the process, without telling them what kind
of culture would replace it. Who wants to work towards a world state
where you have a fixed, a rigidly fixed, intergenerational dominant group
ruling over all the rest? The dominant group ruling in luxury and all the
rest of you kept deprived of the material things of living. That’s part
of totalitarianism, when an elite hold the keys to the distribution of
manufactured goods and so on. Population CONTROL has always been part of
it as well.

They
started with countries in Europe, on the population control rant a long time
ago. At that time, it was seen to be the RIGHT wing, the far right that
wanted it. They were terrified that the lesser breeds, the commoners,
would outbreed the elite type… even though the elite always had far more
children than the commoners did. That’s absolute nonsense to think
it was the other way around… although that is promoted as the myth. I
have books going back to the early 1900s when the big families, the Lords and
peer families, the hereditary peer groups, were churning out books calling for
restrictions of birth for the commoners. There were a lot of books
written as well to counter that by different ministers on behalf of the public
using the statistics of births and saying ‘why don’t the elite give us an
example?’ They would point out how many this family and that family had,
at the top of the food chain.

You
can never take things at face value. You must always look at all sides of
everything and see who’s really PLAYING the sides. I’ve always
said there is another side pulling the strings of both sides. That’s a
fact; there is. They always need TRUE, grassroots believers, the mob, the
sheep in Animal Farm that George Orwell talked about that simply are
there to CHANT the slogans and don’t even notice when the slogan has
altered. They chant it just the same; they are the masses of
followers.

China,
years ago and I’ve read the old reports over the years from China that led up
to be what is now being proclaimed as the world’s example; it’s the MODEL STATE
for the world to follow. The United Nations has said that many
times. With their one child per family policy, which is by the way a
LIE. I read a report a few months ago that said that China had been
actually easing their one child per family policy for those families who
could AFFORD IT, to pay a fine. This is eugenics, you see. Meaning,
those who can afford to have more children, obviously have made it up the food
chain in the psychopathic struggle of psychopaths as they get up into the
politburos that every town over there has. The politburos decide even
what businesses they are going to have now, you understand. It’s really a
fascist system in disguise. In fact, it’s a more perfected fascist system
under the guise of communism. YOU all down there must suffer because
we’re all really struggling but WE at the top have to live a higher lifestyle
because we’re dignitaries and important people you see. That’s the hypocrisy
of communism, but they’re held up to be the model state for the world.

It’s
purely eugenics and it will be worse and worse as time goes on because it will
mean these families, which are already intergenerational – these politburo
types – are psychopathic. They will marry other types of psychopaths that
came up the same way. Only psychopaths struggle up to the top.
They’ve got a LUST for power ordinary folk can not imagine. They
interbreed and the produce worse psychopaths so HELL IS COMING DOWN THE
ROAD. The best laid plans of mice and men, gang aft agley, as they say.

At
the Copenhagen meeting, apart from looting the world and making us all poor in
the process, which is part of the agenda, absolute poverty – I’m not kidding
about that – and governmental regulation under so many guises but technically
it’s the communistic techniques they’re using on the masses, as I said they
would, while the fascist elite remain in place with their big multinational,
international trading deals selling carbon offsets and all the rest of
it. So here they are at Copenhagen prattling on about China being the
model state, again, for the world to follow. Obviously China is also
using it as a bastion against paying too many carbon taxes, even through
they’re the world’s main polluter now because they have all the factories that
the West GAVE them through the GATT Treaty. The Westerners snoozed
through this as their factories were sent abroad and the tax payers of the West
PAID FOR IT ALL, by the way, the whole transplanting process.

This
article here is about Copenhagen and about what’s being discussed there.
It’s from the China Daily.

Population control called key to deal

(Alan:
So there you go, right into it… money and population control. PROFIT
really, and population control. You know darn well that it’s got nothing
to do with what they’re CLAIMING. It’s a beautiful CON, saving the
climate, saving the world and all that stuff. It’s a great con to get
everybody poor while they take it all from the ones at the bottom and bring in
really a communistic society across the globe.)

By Li Xing (China Daily) / 2009-12-10

COPENHAGEN:
Population and climate change are intertwined but the population issue has
remained a blind spot when countries discuss ways to mitigate climate change
and slow down global warming, according to Zhao Baige, vice-minister of
National Population and Family Planning Commission of China (NPFPC). (A:
We’re going to have these same commissioners or Commissariats in all the
Western countries shortly too.)

"Dealing with
climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a
comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and
ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture,"
said Zhao, who is a member of the Chinese government delegation. (A:
And I will add, communist. It’s still communist as far as they proclaim.)

Many studies link
population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change. (A:
Well, it’s interesting. What the Chinese are quoting here are statistics,
all fudged. Statistics are great. I think it was Theo Roosevelt
that first said this. He said, “You have lies; you have damn lies; and
then you have statistics.” It’s another FORM of putting across a
LIE. But if you think ‘well, it’s a scientific thing, then it must be a
fact;’ that’s why they use statistics, and they fudge them all the time.
They use the London School of Economics and the UN’s own statistics to bolster
up their argument here. That’s very interesting indeed. They have
all these fake statistic of how much CO2 they’ll cut back if they reduce the
population by X-amount and so on and all rest of it.)

She admitted that
China's population program is not without consequences, as the country is
entering the aging society fast and facing the problem of gender
imbalance. (A: Ha. Ha. You see, infanticide is
always going on well and good in China. They prefer the males and now
they have an imbalance of way too many males over females. They have an
aging population and they aren’t producing enough children. The UN has
said itself it sees population of China declining DRASTICALLY around 2050, in
fact beyond the state of recovery. It’s amazing how that’s their goal at
the United Nations. It’s to put whole places under to such an extent they
can’t recover. There’s actually an extent where you start to die off, the
breed type dies off. That’s also slated for the West and that’s actually
working, has been working for years. Back with more after this break.)

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, filling in
the blanks that most media leaves out. I’m showing you what’s behind the
articles they produce, what are the REASONS for producing them, what you are
intended to believe. They play on your ignorance. They always
present things with a great slant by omission generally, by omitting any other
factors, except favorable. Favorable factors, kind of like pharma does
when they get special doctors who are well paid to do it, to fudge reports on
drugs. It’s the same idea; just OMIT all the bad stuff, you know, like
deaths and paralysis and stuff like that.

Everything
is meant to be propaganda. Everything is propaganda. Most people
unfortunately don’t know that. The average person out there, in this
audience, WILL know that but people outside who don’t listen to shows like this
will read the regular news, hear the regular media and they think no further
than they’re getting told everything there is to know about something and
that’s all there is. Their opinions are FORMED for them by deliberation
by those who set them up, the process that sets them up.

Margaret
Sanger was a great eugenicist who really spearheaded the abortion and the
sterilization industries. She lived in the US and she formed the group
called Family Planning. She HATED various races; she thought they were
utterly inferior. She was a great admirer of Nazi Germany and Communist
Russia; she loved Stalin as well. She called children WEEDS by the way,
WEEDS, and thought having children really, for a female, was abhorrent in a
sense, like popping out a pumpkin; I think she actually used that term.
You should CRINGE when you realize who the people are behind the big movements
that are ongoing today. You should CRINGE when you realize the HATRED for
humanity that they actually have.

It’s
carried on by big elitist groups. The United Nations is famous for
talking about getting women freedom of choices and all this stuff and it’s not
that at all. You have to go into the Kissinger report where they said
that the third world countries really pose a threat to the state, meaning the
US and the Western world, by their overpopulation and a big plan went into work
to try and encourage women to go in for sterilizations and abortions across the
third world countries. We’re funding so many outfits out there that you
can’t count them all now, through government funding and foundational funding
under the umbrella of the United Nations which pretends it keeps its hands
clean. They will say they don’t actually do abortions themselves.
They just have this umbrella group of NGOs and foundations and government
grants beneath to them that do it all for them. They’re all hypocrites
and liars.

The
Optimum Population Trust is part of this. It’s run by the TOP
fascists. They admit themselves – I read the article from their own web
site some time ago – where they said that most people view them as very rich,
elitist, aristocratic types, WHITE, he says, “which we are.” The chairman
says, “Which we ARE.” They’re all aristocrats, the type of Charles Galton
Darwin’s stock. I think one of their heads right now is Sir Crispin
Tickell, a man who’s not too funny at all regardless of his name. He
really puts Malthus up on a pedestal for his policies and said they should be
followed through. I think he’s also related to the Darwin’s. Now
they’ve come out with these carbon offsets for the wealthier countries.
All of you struggling out there, you are the wealthy people apparently,
according to them. Not the big boys within the Optimum Population Trust;
THEY won’t pay for this, YOU will. They’ve got a web site up now – it
just came out, it popped out – called Pop Offsets, POP Offsets. I suppose
it means population offsets. Or it could be offset the pop, you know, the
papa. It could be that too. Maybe it’s to ‘pop off’ the child
rather than ‘pop out’ the child. It’s up to you to take your pick.
This is from their own web site. I’ll put the links up on the site at the
end of the show if XplorNet gives me the speed to put up a few bits, which they
seldom do now. They do attack you, believe you me, if you’re not ‘on
board’ with the agenda. It says here…

PopOffsets

OPT for lower population, lower emissions.

Welcome to
PopOffsets.

PopOffsets is unique
- the first project in the world that, simply and transparently, enables
individuals and organizations to offset their carbon footprint by funding the
unmet need for family planning (A: That’s the Sanger abortion and
sterilization agenda which they call family planning.) and the removal of
the many barriers to women who want smaller families. (A: They
always pretend they are so caring and they CARE… They don’t care a darn about
women at home or abroad, by the way.)

Our project
recognizes the intrinsic links between increasing CO2 emissions, climate change
and the world’s ever-growing population. (A: So they give you a
site here where you can actually donate to it, to offset your own carbon credits.
This will take off because we’re all going to get PERSONAL billings from the
governments on what they estimate we’ve used for carbon, what we’ve cost them
in carbon for you. We’re going to get that. People will be using
sites like this to offset their carbon, all the big players. They show
you all the different things but it says,

What is PopOffsets?

PopOffsets is an
initiative of the Optimum Population Trust - a leading UK-based environmental
charity (A: You know, one of these foundations.) which has many
prominent patrons. (A: PROMINENT patrons, you know.)

What we do and how
it works

PopOffsets is the
world's first project that offers to offset carbon dioxide emissions through
the most cost-effective and environmentally beneficial means - family
planning. (A: Which, as I say, is abortion and
sterilization, for the third world mainly, on this particular site here.
This is sold to you like a wonderful ad; they want to help people. Back
with more after this break.)

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ve
gone on over the years about giving you sort of previews of the world to come,
showing you instances that were happening at the time and projecting what will
happen in the future and talking about the PROCESS, the deliberate science and process behind DEGRADING society.
I’ve gone through the Huxley material. I did it again last night, a
little bit of it with Julian Huxley who said they must convince the public
and teach them and condition them to stop holding life up to such a high
pedestal, as something special. Human life he was talking about and
how they would have to see themselves
as another kind of animal.

It
was from his particular statement that various books were churned out like Soylent
Green. It was actually a covert way to try and make the planet
FEARFUL about overpopulation, although it kind of had the other effect in the
movie version, where the people end up eating the remains of others, like
little cake bars, green bars that came out of crematoriums. I went on
about the process too, that abortion was the FIRST pillar to help us get into the
acceptance of killing people really, KILLING people, which is killing
OURSELVES. We all come from the same start basically and it’s killing
ourselves off. So it dehumanizes us in the process until it’s normal and
you say ‘so what…’ and then it becomes a business. Abortion industry is a
big business. Then they say ‘what can we do with this fetal
tissue?’ ‘Well, we can experiment with it and find PROFITS in different
ways.’ They sell parts to
different laboratories and pharma companies; they put them in vaccines even,
fetal tissue. I remember in Russia, it was interesting; it was quite a
few years back. They showed you how the elite of Russia were quite
literally, under a particular scientist’s theory, they were basically putting
babies into blenders and having the stuff injected into them thinking it
would give them youthfulness and so on. That was a big, I think it was a
BBC or a Panoramic production.

Nothing
DISGUSTS me at all anymore because I saw this years ago. I knew the
agenda. I knew all the different PARTS of the agenda. I was
conscious of it all as I was living through it. When it happened, all
these different things, knowing where it was going too, and the fact that it
was organizational - abilities and brains - that were obviously all connected
together that were bringing us
along this particular path. Again, about 6 months ago, maybe a year ago,
I mentioned about the new method of disposing of bodies where Sweden was using
them in these big heating facilities. Something like New York’s
got. New York has got a system where the garbage can get burned to
produce heat for certain accommodations and homes and houses. Well, in Sweden
they also have that – I don’t know how many places in Sweden but one city in
particular – and they dispose of their corpses in there too, to add a few
thermal points to their system. Now they’ve come out with a cremation
fluid. I’ve mentioned this before too. It’s called GREEN… anything
that’s got the word GREEN to it must mean it’s okay. They should
really call abortion green too, green abortion, green sterilization, and it
will take off better if they use that slogan. This is from Mother Nature News,
which is a greenie magazine of course. This is called…

Green (gross?) cremation method produces liquid
fertilizer

(A:
No doubt, it will be for Monsanto and the big boys who are in the process of
taking over the last of the independent food supplies on the planet.)

New
climate-friendly(A: I love the terminology, it’s so Soviet.) cremation
method uses water and lye to transform human remains into 200 gallons of liquid
fertilizer.

(A:
See, there’s a profit in everything, everything. In China - the model
state for the world that kills prisoners who they know have a certain DNA type
and blood type to match existing people who want donor organs - they just
execute them and take them. What a business eh? Anything goes in this
disgusting world of today, but you’ve got to understand who’s running it.)

By Stephanie Rogers
Mon, Dec 07 2009 / mnn.com

There are an awful
lot of people on the planet, and modern methods for disposing of human remains
aren’t exactly earth-friendly. (A: Earth friendly, oh my goodness,
earth friendly and green friendly.) A new alternative to cremation
and burial could change that — and even increase food production for those
still living — if we can get past the ‘ick factor’ of liquefying our dead
relatives. (A: Well that will be easy won’t it? That will
be pretty easy, now that you have all these dysfunctional families or people
don’t even know who their parents are, so who will be there to care?)

"Resomation"
is the process of disposing of human corpses through alkaline hydrolysis, which
occurs when the body is sealed inside a vault-like tube filled with water and
lye and steam-heated to 300 degrees. (A: Well hey, that’s going to
give off carbon and pollute the atmosphere.) Three hours later, some
powdery bone fragments and 200 gallons of fluid are all that remains.

Essentially,
Resomation — which was developed by Scottish company Resomation Ltd. (A:
They’d been right into the whiskey there I think.) — is just like the
natural process of decomposition, but on fast-forward. The fluid can be safely
dumped into sewer systems or even used as fertilizer on farms and gardens — a
proposal that some say comes a little too close to ‘Soylent Green’ for comfort.

But unlike cremation
and traditional burial, alkaline hydrolysis doesn’t lead to toxic chemicals
like dioxin and formaldehyde being released into the atmosphere or water
supply. It also uses 80 percent less energy than standard cremation. (A:
It’s good too for the chemical companies that make all the chemicals to do it
all, but they won’t mention that.)

Despite its apparent
eco-friendliness (A: Eco-friendliness, it’s all green and everything
else.), it’s improbable that Resomation will become a common way to deal
with human remains any time soon. It seems unlikely at best that Americans will
accept pouring what’s left of a loved one down a drain or consuming food that
has been sprayed with corpse juice.

But as world leaders
struggle to deal with the immense specter of global warming, solutions like
Resomation may become more palatable — and it’s already accepted by many
religious faiths, including Catholicism. (A: Oh really?)

“We’re not opposed
to it. Environmentally, it seems like the right thing to do,” says Catholic
Cemeteries manager of marketing Amy Profenna. (A: I think she’s
very profane there.)

So
there you go! There you go. You can buy off anybody to say anything
can’t you. Of course, no one would actually take the bribe would
they? Not in this world, it’s so honest and transparent. Quite something.
Quite something.

There’s
another article here on the carbon trading. This was predicted AGES ago
with this carbon trading scheme, how it was really meant for the rich at the
top of course and all the poor folk down below are going to be raped and
pillaged to get the taxes out of them and eventually leading to the abolition
of private property - which is on the list, by the way, of the United Nations.
So they’ve got a few different planks to go, not far mind you; they’re on
the road. It says here from clickgreen.org.uk. Everything is green
now isn’t it? Remember, green was the sacred color, meaning the successful conclusion of communism.
The red star was the star of the revolutionary part of it. You’ve got red
lodges, black lodges, green lodges, blue lodges, and so on, the ‘rainbow’
coalition. It says here…

UK's richest man could make more than £1bn from carbon
trading scheme

Could
Mittal be laughing all the way to the bank with his carbon credits?

by ClickGreen staff / Published Mon 07 Dec 2009

New analysis
released by climate change NGO Sandbag has revealed that the UK’s richest
resident, Lakshmi Mittal, CEO and major shareholder of the steel giant
ArcelorMittal, could make over £1 billion between now and 2012 from his
company’s participation in the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme. (A:
They were given all these things initially BY the EU Parliament, these
corporations, given them FREE and they’ve already been making MILLIONS off them
by trading them to each other. YOU won’t get that option at the
bottom. You might get the option of getting a little reduction if you go
into the Optimum Population Trust to sterilize people abroad. That might
be for you, but you won’t be able to get into the big group at the top that can
do what these guys do.)

ArcelorMittal has
over 14 million emissions permits that it does not need (A: It’s
bought them in advance, or it was given to them or they’ve already traded them
from other companies.) in 2008, a figure which Sandbag estimates will rise
to 80 million by 2012 making it by far the biggest beneficiary of the scheme
across the EU. (A: It’s beautiful isn’t it, because you don’t
move anything. You don’t move anything. It’s better than selling
debt, where nothing is moved either except blips on a computer and promissory
notes.)

Sandbag has written
to CEO Laksmi Mittal urging him to commit to cancelling his company’s unneeded
emissions permits in what would be the largest act of climate philanthropy on
record. (A: Ha!) If cancelled the 80 million surplus permits
would prevent 80 million tonnes worth of pollution going into the world’s
atmosphere (A: How? How?), equivalent to the annual
emissions of Denmark (A: It’s beautiful how they come up with these
great statistics out of CO2 air. Utter rubbish, BUT they will make a
massive killing on utter rubbish.).

Interesting
too. Everyone who’s worked for a corporation or a company or any
government institution knows the score from the first day they arrive that
there is a policy and through the scuttlebutt that’s allowed to continue, or
make its rounds through the companies, you know immediately if it’s privately
owned or if it’s a director in charge, you know immediately what his policies
are, what he PREFERS. It’s the same in hospitals or where ever it happens
to be; there is always a preferred way of doing things, that so-and-so
likes. If you’re a journalist and you work for a newspaper, you
immediately catch on to what the OWNER likes and what the editors like, so you
know what stories NOT to cover; or, if you have to cover them, you know how to
SLANT it. That’s standard. If you want to keep your job, that’s
what you do. But government institutions tend to do it a little
differently. They put down through surveys, to find out who is either pro
or against something, but they always make it known in advance what they prefer
at the top. If you want to keep your job, you go with the guys at the
top, obviously. We find that, from the Times Online, the Met office in
London…

Top scientists rally to the defence of the Met Office

From The Times December 10, 2009 / Julia
Slingo

The Met Office (A:
That’s a government office.) has embarked

(A: They’re
making a fortune on this con of global warming. Suddenly these
scientists… you understand that during the 50s and 60s and 70s up into the 80s
people were encouraged to go in, to make money, lots of money. Either they went
into medicine, pharmacology, at the top that is, like selling the stuff or
marketing, or go into law or to go into especially the law attached to
government, or go into sciences but mainly the sort of nuclear sciences to do
with missile defenses. Every so often you had this supposed race going on
where both sides would claim that the other side had a faster missile or whatever
and you had to come out with this new one. So you could spend your whole
lifetime and retire, and lots of them did, piling in the money that came from
government grants to design new missiles. After the Cold War, we suddenly
emerged into the ONE system, the synthesis of capitalist/communism. The
thing now is global warming. It’s the new enemy you see, and that’s what
the Club of Rome said. They had to come up with a new enemy and man would
be the problem and global warming, famine and the like would ‘fit the bill’.
That’s their very words from their own book. Now they’re going in to
this. They’re all getting massive grants and suddenly they’re all very
important scientists. Before if you worked for the weather men, you
happened to meet them in conversation and you say what do you do? Well,
I’m in the weather department and you sort of ah, ha, yes, very interesting and
you’d walk on. But now they’re suddenly famous and they’re strutting
around just like the people did when Kung-Fu first came out. In every
Chinese restaurant you went in, in Europe, these little waiters were strutting
around for the first time because everyone thought they knew Kung-Fu. The
same idea, you’re suddenly important. So this article says here…

The Met Office has
embarked on an urgent exercise to bolster the reputation of climate-change
science after the fervor over stolen e-mails.

More than 1,700
scientists have agreed to sign a statement defending the “professional
integrity” of global warming research. They were responding to a round-robin
request from the Met Office, which has spent four days collecting signatures.
The initiative is a sign of how worried it is that e-mails stolen from the
University of East Anglia are fuelling scepticism about man-made global warming
at a critical moment in talks on carbon emissions.

One scientist said
that he felt under pressure to sign the circular or risk losing work (A:
His job.). The Met Office admitted that many of the signatories did not
work on climate change. (A: So it didn’t matter if you didn’t
work in the climate change department; that would be good enough. See,
they’re liars and cheats and all the rest of it aren’t they? They’re PROVING it
by doing that survey. What department are you? Oh, I’m not in the
weather. It doesn’t matter, THEY won’t know, just sign your name
here. [Alan laughing.] So it says…)

John Hirst, the Met
Office chief executive (A: So here you are, the CEO), and Julia Slingo,
its chief scientist, wrote to 70 colleagues on Sunday asking them to sign “to
defend our profession against this unprecedented attack to discredit us and the
science of climate change”. (A: Now why didn’t they say ‘we’re
very impartial about this science, what do you really think about it?’
No, they said, ‘it’s to defend our profession against this unprecedented attack
to discredit us and the science of climate change’. So there is their
mindset right away. So anybody who signs that says, ‘I want to keep my
job; I’d better sign it.’ [Alan laughing.]) They asked them to
forward the petition to colleagues to generate support “for a simple statement
that we . . . have the utmost confidence in the science base that underpins the
evidence for global warming”. (A: There are your con games right
in action right there; ‘do you want to keep your job?’ ‘ Well, yeah.’
Wonderful eh?)

Now,
remember I’ve gone into the United Nations and its precursor - it’s a kind of
phoenix type system that’s supposed to alter every so many years into its next
phase because its predecessor, the League of Nations, was started up with the
INTENTION of bringing in global government. It has all the departments
that you have within the United Nations that your Federal government
has. For everything that it’s involved in, within, so does the
United Nations on a much bigger scale. You don’t realize that pretty much
all your laws that come down the pike to do with land, with water rights, well
drilling, septic systems, maintenance, conservation, all that comes from the
UN. Even building a house and the structure of it for the engineers, all
comes from dictates by the United
Nations. Building codes of all kinds, electrical codes, plumbing codes,
and on and on it goes. Well the UN now is pushing its next, they always
push for the next thing. They’re literally going to take over the
SEA. No travel, no freedom of travel on the sea without their
permission. Back with more after this break.

Hi
folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. The
UN was designed to take over all the functions and the authority over, that
really national governments had in the past, because it’s to be the END of
NATIONALISM. When it was set up in the first place, it said its main
enemy was nationalism, followed by INDIVIDUALISM. The destruction of INDIVIDUALISM
was necessary, they said, to bring in a collectivist type society… a long time
ago. The only ones who will actually be individuals are those at the top
who can afford it. This is from the Times, as they’re after the
sea. They already own the sea basically because they’ve already signed
agreements bit by bit, then they put them into force years later.

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'

From The Times December 10, 2009 / Frank Pope, Ocean
Correspondent

The 400-year-old
freedom of the high seas would be lost under United Nations plans to limit
environmental damage. (A: See how they will use it for EVERYTHING.)

Military forces of
several nations are in discussions with conservationists over pooling
surveillance resources to enforce the changes.

The “freedom of the
seas” has given mariners legal rights to roam the high seas — a boundary that
usually occurs 200 nautical miles from shore — at will. Specialists gathered at
a London conference are saying that fishermen have been pushing the concept too
far.

The United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea came into force in 1983 (A: I
remember at the time talking about that and no one would listen.) and
enshrined the 17th-century concept of the freedom of the seas. But while being
on the high seas puts ships outside the jurisdiction of any one country, the small
print of the law dictates that nations ensure that no undue damage is
caused. (A: In other words, massive loopholes; they can
literally go after everything, right.)

“The freedom of the
high seas has always been accompanied by attendant responsibilities in the Law
of the Sea Convention,” said Jeff Ardron, director of the high seas programme
for the Marine Conservation Biology Institute.

“They were not
unfettered freedoms — they have just been treated that way. The time has come
when we are finally going to implement the Law of the Sea Convention as it was
intended,” he told the Natural England conference, entitled Sea Change:
securing a future for Europe’s seas.

The UN General
Assembly voted last week to impose strict regulations on high seas
bottom-trawling vessels. (A: It’s amazing; they let that happen to
certain countries like Canada for about 30 years and now they’re just stopping
it. Canadians weren’t allowed to fish there; it was everybody else.
In fact, they put the whole fishing business pretty well under in Canada thanks
to the United Nations by allowing all the Spanish ones and all the ones across
over in Europe to fish everything and bottom troll it as well, across the
Canadian shore lines. That was a policy to put all the Canadian fishermen
out of business.) Next February a UN working group will meet to
discuss establishing Marine Protected Areas on the high seas to create
boundaries within which fishing activities are restricted.

Fishing vessels are
not required to carry the same automatic identification system that tracks the
identity of merchant ships. Closing this loophole will be crucial to keeping
their activities in check, said Kristina Gjerde, the high seas policy adviser
for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.

You
know eventually you’re going to get no protein. You ever wonder why the
mad cow thing broke out? Did it ever dawn on you that it might not have
existed at all? They kept showing the same
poor cow going across a barnyard, in every country, and then they slaughtered
pretty well ALL of the cattle of Britain especially and a good part of
Europe. Lots of folk went vegetarian, terrified. Then they told you
‘don’t eat fish, there’s mercury in it; don’t eat that.’ Then H1N1 come
from chickens. Go veggie, go veggie… You don’t catch on to it do
you, what’s really going on in? The WAR is going on and you’ve been
living through it without even KNOWING it.

From
Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your
Gods GO with you.