Military Intervention in Syria: Only Causes More Violence

Syrian Information Minister about a possible U.S. intervention in Syria.

In a new statement, the Syrian Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi made the remarks that a military intervention by the U.S. military in Syria will only trigger more violence in the Middle East and certainly be no solution for the conflicts in the region. Contrary, a military intervention will increase the bloodshed and violence in Syria as well as in the Middle East.

The known Syrian Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi made these new statements about the meanwhile possible military intervention by the U.S. military in Syria in an interview with the TV station of al-Mayadeen from Lebanon on Saturday.

Omran al-Zoubi, Syrias Information Minister, also said in his interview with the Lebanese TV station al-Mayadeen that the basic repercussion of a military intervention in Syria by foreign forces would “be a ball of fire that would burn not only Syria but the whole Middle East.”

This comparison with a ball of fire that would burn not only Syria but the entire region is similar to earlier remarks by political analysts and experts on the events in the Middle East from Europe and the United States. According to the Syrian Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi, an attack on Syria would be “no easy trip” for the U.S. military or NATO forces.

During the recent year, the violence and terrorism of the Syrian conflict and mainly perpetrated by the foreign-backed terrorist groups and the Syrian al-Qaeda offshoots on Syrian soil have already spilled over to some other parts of the Middle East.

The U.S. administration in Washington has just released a new statement yesterday. The statement by the White House says that the U.S. leadership is not yet sure whether the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad in Damascus was responsible for the alleged deadly attack with chemical weapons near the capital of Syria. According to the video documentaries by the team of ANNA-news, the Syrian Arab army (SAA) has not used any kind of chemical weapons agents (e.g. sarin nerve gas) in their military operations in Jobar near the Syrian capital, Damascus.

Further, it would have been very stupid by the Syrian army as well as by the government of President al-Assad in Damascus to carry out such an attack with chemical weapons on the same day when the UN team of experts arrive in the capital.

The Western propaganda about the chemical weapons attack by the Syrian army sounds fishy and implies a false-flag attack by the foreign-backed terrorists in Jobar or a huge campaign of lies with the use of many dead bodies from northern Syria (e.g. Syrian Kurds). Not to mention that some images of dead bodies are from a mosque in Egypt and not from Syria.

Syria – Jobar – ANNA-news

However, according to Marat Musin from ANNA-news, the claim that chemical weapons have been used by the Syrian Army in its operations in Jobar by the external “Syrian opposition” (staged bunch in order to maintain a “political show”) was stupid and the West has just confirmed its support for Al Qaeda in Syria.

The so-called “Syrian opposition” outside the Arab nation has claimed on Wednesday, that around 1,300 people were killed in an attack by the Syrian forces with chemical weapons on strongholds of the foreign-backed terrorist groups in these suburbs of the Syrian capital Damascus: Ain Tarma, Jobar and Zamalka.

However, the Syrian military as well as the government in Damascus have strongly rejected any role behind this alleged chemical weapons attack on armed terrorist groups in Jobar, Zamalka and Ain Tarma. In addition, the video recordings (ANNA-news) of the military operations by the Syrian Army in Jobar testify that no chemical weapons agents have been used during these operations on this day as well as the following days.

The accusations against the Syrian government and the national army of Syria are fabricated to distract the visit of the UN team of experts, which is already in Syria in order to investigate the alleged use of chemical weapons during the conflict in the Arab nation. In addition, the allegations and possible false-flag action should serve as a pretext to save Obamas ass and cover up the heavy losses of the foreign-backed terrorist groups in Syria.

It should be a warning sign for the U.S. administration as well as for the NATO forces that the Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman, Abbas Araqchi, has recently again warned against a foreign military intervention in Syria and stated that there is also no international mandate for a military intervention and attack in and on Syria.