Sunday, November 16, 2008

Emilio Naranjo, R.I.P.

Emilio Naranjo was not the last patron in New Mexico. But he was the last patron who ruled uncontested, during his time. And he was the only New Mexico patron of his generation who enjoyed a national reputation.

His reputation went national in 1960 when he supported Lyndon Johnson, and then Jack Kennedy, for president giving Kennedy a huge margin toward his narrow victory in New Mexico. Kennedy, who loved political bosses, never forgot the favor and Lyndon Johnson rewarded him in 1965 by appointing him U.S. Marshall. But he had already been around New Mexico state circles for many years. He was elected chair of the Democratic Party in Rio Arriba County in 1953 and Sheriff in 1958. At one point he was state director of the Department of Motor Vehicles. His son Benny became Sheriff in 1965 when Emilio resigned that position to become federal Marshall.

Naranjo was a young man (born in 1916) when political change came to the Hispanic North, in the form of the Roosevelt election of 1932. Within the next eight years the North would switch from being heavily Republican to being heavily Democratic. Naranjo single-mindedly set about controlling the levers of power in that county, and did not relinquish his control until the mid-1990s, when he was defeated by Arturo Rodarte in a primary election for state senate. His power was fully consolidated in the late 1970s with his appointment in 1977 and election in 1978 to the New Mexico Senate and his appointment in 1978 as county manager. He was also Democratic Party chair in Rio Arriba County. But he was convicted of perjury that same year in a case in which he was accused of planting marijuana in the car of his 1976 opponent for Sheriff, Moises Morales. The conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1980, allowing him to resume his senate seat, but thereafter his reputation, if not his power, suffered from a feeling among observers that his ability to deliver votes to Democrats gave him special privileges within the political class of New Mexico, a commentary more damning about the political class of New Mexico, perhaps, than about Emilio Naranjo.

The essentially conservative nature of Naranjo's power base was revealed clearly during the Tijerina phenomenon of the late 1960's. Tijerina, who accused the Forest Service of violating the terms of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo when it expropriated land grant territory, was a true rebel, willing to shake up power structures through unconventional tactics and appealing to national sympathy. The power structure Tijerina most resented was Naranjo's, which steadfastedly cooperated with the law enforcement agencies that eventually brought Tijerina down. Naranjo's son Benny, Sheriff of Rio Arriba at the time, was pistol whipped by Reies Tijerina during the so-called Tierra Amarilla Courthouse Raid of 1966, and ordered at gunpoint by Tijerina to free the prisoners in the courthouse. Tijerina was acquitted of charges stemming from this incident, in a trial in which he acted as his own attorney. Likewise, the Raza Unida Party, a left-of-center movement trying to organize Hispanics in the Southwest under a party banner, found its Rio Arriba activists and candidates under attack during the mid-1970s, particularly from the Sheriff's department. Raza Unida leaders accused Naranjo of election manipulation and of fomenting police brutality.

I knew Naranjo casually. When we were both county chairs we would exchange minor favors on votes at statewide conventions, and we maintained a cordial, somewhat formal, relationship. He came and spoke to one of my university classes on politics in New Mexico (his son Larry, now a city councilor in Rio Rancho was in that class), and I would hear about him from students of mine from Rio Arriba county. My last meeting with him, in 1992, did not go well. I went up to his home (a mobile home) near Espanola with Sonny Rivera to see if I could persuade him to encourage Indian participation in the forthcoming 400th anniversary commemoration of Onate's arrival in New Mexico in 1598. Naranjo had acquired funds to have Sonny Rivera, from Mesquite, NM, sculpt a bronze statue of Onate. Naranjo was adamantly against my proposition, and it was clear to me that, for better or worse, that was the final word. There was no appeal.

In truth, Naranjo was a talented politician, well liked by many, with a large following, and he knew how to get things done. That the kind of power he wielded could surface in a county in New Mexico is explained by contradictory things: on the one hand it speaks of the power of his charisma and the fierce loyalty it inspired. These are highly positive, and they rightly inspire a deep pride in Rio Arriba county. But on the other hand that one man could acquire such power speaks volumes about the isolation of the people of Rio Arriba country from the wheels of power in Santa Fe, 30 minutes away, and about how policy and taxpayer funds are distributed through the political system of the state. These inspire much less pride.

1 comment:

Anonymous
said...

Will the $500 Million dollar lose to the State of NM budget we will never get our streets and water systems fixed here in Vado- Any idea maybe Gov Richardson can pull the plug on the $250 Million dollar Spaceport Project.

Army Unit Assigned to Juarez

Links

Is it a conflict of interest for Cynthia Nava to be GISD Superintendent and State Senator at the same time?

The New Electoral Map

Click on Map for Larger View

Will President-elect Obama give Governor Richardson a job in his administration?

Senator John Arthur Smith and Speaker Ben Lujan

Mark Bralley, photographer

Comments Policy

Comments are important means of stimulating debate, learning other points of view, criticizing what is going on or being said, praising someone who deserves it, and keeping in touch with the community. While it doesn't always need to be polite or phrased nicely, a comment should contribute to a community discussion. It should not be seen as an opportunity to attack someone personally. This shuts down debate and splinters community.

All comments are approved before they are posted. Each will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. These are some of the ground rules:

1. Anonymous Comments: For the moment I will allow comments to remain anonymous. Most of the time there is no valid reason for someone to wish to remain anonymous, and I would encourage people to sign their names. It seems cowardly for someone to sharply criticize a person without being willing to identify her/himself. But in some cases, there may be a valid reason for anonymity. If there are further efforts to orchestrate anonymous comments to further a political objective I will change this policy and require everyone to register before making a comment.

2. Personal Attacks: These are not permitted. It is fine to speak out against a public official or criticize me or someone else, but the emphasis should be on constructive criticism. Giving reasons why you think someone is wrong is fine, but calling people names is not. One objective in this blog is to encourage debate, and name-calling and personal attacks produce the opposite result.

3. Libel: I will not post libelous comments. While public figures do not enjoy quite the same protection against libel as the rest of us, they have rights. If you do not know what libel is, I would refer you to the Wikipedia Encyclopedia (google it in), where you can find a great, readable article about it.

4. Campaigning: This is not a forum for candidates to use as campaign vehicles. Candidates are welcome and even encouraged to participate in the discussion, as well as people favoring causes, but they should stick to the issues.

5. Be factual: If I see serious factual errors in your comments I will not post them. If you submit as fact a statement that cannot be verified, I will not post it. This is not a forum for spreading rumors.

6. Be Brief: I have posted some rather lengthy pieces and have edited others, and I will deal with this on a case-by-case basis. I don't have a word limit, but please be as brief as possible.

7. Grammar: Incoherent comments will not be posted.

8. Profanity: This is not allowed.

9. Retractions: Should a retraction be necessary I will evaluate whether to remove the posting entirely or explain the reason for the retraction at the beginning of the piece.

10. Privacy: This site does gather standard personal information about users in the course of recording statistics on the number of daily visitors to the site. That information includes IP addresses, internet service provider, type of operating system, and internet browser used, screen resolution and color depth, language, and the pages the user visited on this site. I take privacy seriously and will not share users' personal information with any third party, except as required by law.

11. Third Party Links: users of this blog agree that this site and its owner are not responsible for any damage, injury, or loss that results from interaction and transactions between the user and web sites the user visits by clicking on links to this site.

About Me

Dr. Jose Z. Garcia taught at New Mexico State for three decades before becoming Secretary of Higher Education, a post he occupied during the entire first term of Governor Susana Martinez. He specializes in Latin America, the U.S.-Mexico border, and New Mexico politics. He was chairman of the Democratic Party in Dona Ana County the early 1980s. Currently he is on sabbatical but will return to teaching in 2016.