Thursday, 10 November 2016

The Fool On The Hill

6 comments:

The BBC News website this morning has ten or so anti Trump 'news stories' - Oh, and one anti Brexit. No positive acknowledgement of the will of the majority of the US voting public whatsoever. This is becoming a carbon copy of the BBC's UK EU Referendum coverage in support of the Remoaners. The BBC are confused. Is this biassed coverage of the US election served up for the benefit of the majority of UK Licence payers (who they have already labelled as uneducated and racist), or is it a pathetic attempt to join forces with the US intellectual elite, who they (mistakenly) think are all anti Trump?

See the BBC at its most out of touch with the UK electorate - you know, the ones who pay their Licence fees:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-37921356

Here we have in a nutshell the opinions of some self-appointed London-type 'grievers' who were genuinely caught by surprise when it dawned upon them that people 'in the rest of the country' do not share their pro EU views.

Never mind, with 'Hands across the Sea', they can all share their grief at the outcome of the UK Referendum with their cousins in the USA, as they themselves come to terms with the Trump victory. I'm sure the average US citizen will be delighted to have a group hug with some of our remoaners.

"By contrast, the BBC’s Neil and his co-host Katty Kay seemed to be sniggering at the whole event, as if it were a remote contest in rural Bavaria, something beneath them.

As the votes rolled Trump’s way they began to act as if they had been set an amusing intellectual problem, while Jeremy Vine capered around a series of computer-generated graphs, like a grinning Zebedee in an unwise shirt.

Thank goodness for Emily Maitlis, bringing gravitas to each new win or surprise reversal. The BBC’s talking heads all looked a bit frightened."