This site is provided by Oxquarry Books Ltd. Please visit our Pushkin web site for works by Pushkin, Chekhov and others, translated into English. Click here for a full list. Also some modern short stories by Frances King not published elsewhere. Click here to find them.

O me! what eyes hath Love put in my head,Which have no correspondence with true sight;Or, if they have, where is my judgment fled,That censures falsely what they see aright?If that be fair whereon my false eyes dote,What means the world to say it is not so?If it be not, then love doth well denoteLove's eye is not so true as all men's: no,How can it? O! how can Love's eye be true, That is so vexed with watching and with tears?No marvel then, though I mistake my view;The sun itself sees not, till heaven clears.O cunning Love! with tears thou keep'st me blind,Lest eyes well-seeing thy foul faults should find.

A somewhat
disturbing sonnet which forms one
of the group of four (147-50) in which the poet sees his love as a sort
of raging fever, a madness in his blood, and he endeavours to come to
terms
with his own perplexity. There are probably hidden threads of reference
in this group of poems which now can no longer be uncovered. The
foulness
with which he manages to end each of the four sonnets (blackness,
foulness,
defect, unworthiness) probably refers to her perceived unfaithfulness,
but
may also have implications of sexual voracity and/or disease, the
French
malady as it was called, a name which covered various sexually
transmitted
diseases, but more often referred to syphilis and its devastating
effects.
The sonnet may also be read as if it were part of a sequence
complaining
of a beloved mistress's disdain, but given the content of some of the
surrounding
sonnets, (e.g. 142, 151, 152) it seems more probable that there are
other
hidden and more sinister meanings.

The 1609 Quarto Version

OMe ! what eyes hath loue put in my head,
Which haue no correſpondence with true ſight,
Or if they haue,where is my iudgement fled,
That cenſures falſely what they ſee aright ?
If that be faire whereon my falſe eyes dote,
What meanes the world to ſay it is not ſo?
If it be not,then loue doth well denote,
Loues eye is not ſo true as all mens:no,
How can it ? O how can loues eye be true,
That is ſo vext with watching and with teares?
No maruaile then though I miſtake my view,
The ſunne it ſelfe ſees not, till heauen cleeres.
O cunning loue,with teares thou keepſt me blinde,
Leaſt eyes well ſeeing thy foule faults ſhould finde.

Commentary

1. O me! what eyes hath Love put in my head,

O me! - an
exclamation of despair
or sadness, equivalent to 'Alas!', as in 41 which deals with the youth
taking
the poet's lover, probably the same dark lady as the one described
here:
Ay me! but yet thou might'st my seat forbear,
And chide thy beauty and thy straying youth, 41. Love = Venus or Cupid, usually the latter, who
was often portrayed
as a mischievous babe. In Astrophel and Stella Cupid takes up residence
in Stella's eyes, her hair, her lips etc. :
Cupid, because thou shin'st in Stella's eyes,
That from her locks, thy day-nets, none scapes free,
That those lips swell, so full of thee they be,
That her sweet breath makes oft thy flames to rise,
That in her breast thy pap well sugared lies, A&S.12.
But also Love here refers to 'the emotional
experience of loving'
and to 'the act of love'. In many ways the poem reads more easily if
one
takes the latter meaning at the outset and sees it as a meditation on
sex,
sexual intercourse, and sexual infatuation. The bawdy puns in 8-10 then
become more relevant, and even the commonly held view of all men (all
men's
no) that 'Love's eye is not true' acquires the additional meaning that
'the
cunt is a betrayer', a crude sort of folk wisdom among men from time
immemorial.
Overlaying all this is the classical myth that Cupid is blind and
therefore
obviously cannot see truly. The poem is operating on many levels at
once,
and no commentary can keep all these concurrent meanings active
simultaneously,
as one can do in reading it.
1-6. The poem opens with a succession of questions which may be also
read
as exclamations. The poet is both puzzled and amazed by what Love can
do.

2. Which have no correspondence with true sight;

correspondence = agreement, concordance,
matching relationship. Also communication, contact with (OED.5.a.).true sight = that which the eyes would truly
see if they were seeing
correctly (if they had not been hijacked by love).

3. Or, if they have, where is my judgment fled,

if they have = if my eyes have true
sight.
judgement = reason, good sense. As in the previous sonnet,
where reason
abandons him.

4. That censures falsely what they see aright?

censures = passes judgement on, evaluates
(in this case falsely, erroneously). The modern meaning of 'condemn'
was
not in use at the time. Compare:
Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the
better
judge. JC.III.2.16-17.
Note that this Julius Caesar example puns on the similar sounds of
'sense'
and 'censure'.
what they see aright = what my eyes see correctly. As in the
other sonnets
about eyes and heart or eyes and judgement such as 113-4, the
psychology
is uncertain. The dispute is set up between the eyes which claim to see
the truth, and the heart, which claims otherwise, a poetic conceit
which
does not necessarily have to conform to any pre-ordained ideas of
mental
functioning.

5. If that be fair whereon my false eyes dote,

fair - as in the previous sonnet,
fair has its usual meanings of 'blonde, bright, good, just, beautiful'.
The eyes can only pick out what is external and physically fair, but
they
do no see into the heart.
dote - the word most commonly used to describe a besotted
infatuation.
Compare 113 on a similar theme
Who in despite of view is pleased to dote;

6. What means the world to say it is not so?

it is not so = i.e that you are not
as fair as my eyes or my mind indicate.

7. If it be not, then love doth well denote

If it be not = if it is not so; if
it is not as I believe it to be. The phrase simply takes up the ending
of
the previous line.
love doth well denote = (my) love for you amply demonstrates.
However
these two lines, 7-8, may be read in a number of ways. This depends
partly
on punctuation, but the meanings are more seriously affected by the
loose
syntax, the fact that 'love' occurs twice, possibly with the same
meaning,
possibly not, and by the floating 'no' at the end of line 8. denote
probably means 'shows, demonstrates', and the approximate meaning of
the
two lines would be 'Love, the experience and passion of love, amply
demonstrates
that lovers' ways of seeing are not the same as all men's. Clearly
not.'
An alternative meaning is '.........Cupid shows that his way of seeing
things
is not the same as men's'. Finally, taking no as
being the exclamation
that men make to contradict his (the poet's) judgement, it could be 'my
experience of love shows that Love compels me to see things opposite to
all men's denial of her beauty'.

8. Love's eye is not so true as all men's: no,

Love's eye - see the note above for the meaning of this line. The phrase 'love's eye also had a bawdy meaning of 'vulva' or 'female genitalia'. See Partridge p.109, under 'eye'. The idea is probably developed further in lines 13-14, when the poet hints that he is blinded by his sexual infatuation. Also one can perhaps see a connection with the previous sonnet and the possible references to venereal disease, which might well produce watching as a result of pain, and tears in the form of fluxes and discharges (line 10). A pun may also be intended on aye, 'love's yes', a consent or non-consent to have sex. Compare Wyatts poem asking the lady to answer yea or nay, given with sonnet 137. all men's: no, - the punctuation given is that of Q. See the note to the line above for interpretations. It could be read as "All men's 'No!'", i.e. the general repudiation of her fairness, or her truth. Or it could be an exclamation standing more or less alone and linking to the following line, 'No! How can it?!' The punctuation cannot be taken as decisive, and various meanings were doubtless intended to be conveyed. all men's no is probably a slang expression for the penis.

9. How can it? O! how can Love's eye be true,

O! - this may be a deliberate echo of all men's no and invites one to think of women's O as in the folk poem Childrens Ahs and Womens Ohs Doe a wondrous griefe disclose; which is given in full with sonnet 135. Partridge links eye to O in his gloss of the bawdy meaning of eye. See Partridge p.109 and SB. p.521.

10. That is so vexed with watching and with tears?

vexed with watching and with tears =
disturbed, aggravated by staying awake and by weeping. Watching and
weeping
were traditional attributes of the besotted lover. The idea is used in
41,
when the poet tells of his love weariness: It is my love that keeps mine eye awake;
Mine own true love that doth my rest defeat,
To play the watchman ever for thy sake: 41.
The marks of a lover are given by Speed, the clown servant, in Two
Gentlemen
of Verona:
Val. Why, how know you that I am in love? Speed. Marry, by these special marks: first,
you have
learned, like Sir Proteus, to wreathe your arms,
like a malcontent; to relish a love-song, like a
robin-redbreast; to walk alone, like one that had
the pestilence; to sigh, like a school-boy that had
lost his A B C; to weep, like a young wench that had
buried her grandam; to fast, like one that takes
diet; to watch like one that fears robbing; to
speak puling, like a beggar at Hallowmas. TGV.II.1.16-25.
Weeping and watching were evidently part of the ritual of loving, or at
least part of the way in which it was described. See also the note
above
to line 8. The tears may also hint at less pleasant experiences, as for
example mentioned in 119: What potions have I drunk of Siren tears,
Distill'd from limbecks foul as hell within, 119.
Or possibly sexual pleasure is hinted at and the hunger for more.
Despite
the description given by Speed above, weeping does not feature all that
often in sonnets of the period, perhaps because it was considered too
unmanly.
William Smith describes oceans of weeping:
But my love's sea, which never limit keepeth,
Which never ebbs, but always ever floweth,
In liquid salt unto my Chloris weepeth; Chl.30.(1596).
Barnabe Barnes (1593) amongst his almost interminable plaints to his
mistress
speaks more often of weeping. One of his Elegies begins:
Behold these tears, my love's true tribute payment!
P&P.El.6.
In another he is blinded with tears:
Ah then! even then, in spirit crucified,
Mine eyes with tears, mine heart with sighs and throbs;
Those almost blind! that, hard swollen, almost burst! P&P.El.14.
And Griffin in Fidessa (1596) enjoins himself to weep no more:
Weep now no more mine eyes, but be you drowned
In your own tears, so many years distilled! Fid.30.
Sidney mostly speaks of Cupid weeping, or Stella, rarely himself,
although
he does occasionally mention his own tears: Oft with true sighs, oft with uncalled tears,
Now with slow words, now with dumb eloquence
I Stella's eyes assail, invade her ears; A&S.61.
We cannot know for certain therefore whether Shakespeare is parodying
these
probably earlier poems, or using the convention for its own sake, or
introducing
the idea of weeping and tears to cast dark hints on his mistress's
sexual
proclivities and her possibly diseased state.

11. No marvel then, though I mistake my view;

No marvel then = it is then no wonder
though I mistake my view = that I misinterpret, that I am
mistaken in
what I think I see. though in this context implies
'even though'.

12. The sun itself sees not, till heaven clears.

Perhaps a nostalgic echo of Yet him for this my love no whit disdaineth; Suns of the world may stain when heaven's sun staineth. 33.

13. O cunning Love! with tears thou keep'st me blind,

O cunning Love! - a complex bawdy
pun, using O (women's Ohs), cunning
(skilful in love, cunt-knowing,
cunt-chasing), and Love (making love) to react with
the surface meaning
of 'all-knowing, ingenious Cupid'. However the meaning of Love
also
merges into that of 'love itself (Cupid, Venus, abstract love)', 'my
love
for you', and 'you, the beloved', the poet's mistress, since she is the
one accused of being 'foul' in the next line. The fact that Cupid was
blind
meant that he desired others to be the same, but he himself was gifted
with
a second sight, and was a God.

14. Lest eyes well-seeing thy foul faults should find.

eyes well-seeing = healthy eyes seeing
without fault and impediment. thy foul faults =
your crimes, your
foul diseases. Evidently Love in the line above is
no longer Cupid,
or the passion of love, but the dark lady herself. foul
could possibly
be a noun, meaning 'foulness', and the line would then be read as 'Lest
eyes seeing your foulness would then inevitably find faults in you'.