You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

So the order of the original enneagram is arbitrary? I never really got that thing fully. I started learning about wings and then my friend was like: Blah, blah wings are pointless. So now I just don't know what to think anymore.

So the order of the original enneagram is arbitrary? I never really got that thing fully. I started learning about wings and then my friend was like: Blah, blah wings are pointless. So now I just don't know what to think anymore.

To be clear, there's a little arbitration in everything. But the system elaborated here attempts to minimize arbitration and maximize deduction/inferrence from what was arbitrated. This can certainly not be said of the enneagram.

Go to sleep, iguana.

_________________________________INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.Live and let live will just amount to might makes right

"I have stated several times before on this forum that I determined the original wing system to be baseless. The need for the wing type to be "adjacent" didn't make sense, since as my variable system indicates, the actual order of the numbers that the types were assigned is meaningless. There is no sensible reason that 7s should be next to 6s, for example. So, anything based off of that order, like the wings, needs to completely reformed."

"I have stated several times before on this forum that I determined the original wing system to be baseless. The need for the wing type to be "adjacent" didn't make sense, since as my variable system indicates, the actual order of the numbers that the types were assigned is meaningless. There is no sensible reason that 7s should be next to 6s, for example. So, anything based off of that order, like the wings, needs to completely reformed."

This is wrong.

You're not the first person to say that here, so why not take a look through the whole thead and see some of the discussion that took place about it?

Go to sleep, iguana.

_________________________________INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.Live and let live will just amount to might makes right