J.A.I.L. News
Journal
______________________________________________________Los Angeles, California March 5,
2006______________________________________________________
The Inherent Right of ALL
People to Alter or Reform Their Government.
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend.
__________________________________________________www.sd-jail4judges.org

Rogue Miscreant
Legislators

Who is Innocent and Not
Conflicted?

The day before yesterday, March
3, 2006, we published a J.A.I.L. News Journal entitled, "Rogue
Miscreant Cops," the Los Angeles Times newspaper article by
Scott Glover being entitled, "3 More Arrested in Rogue Cop
Robberies."

Having read the first five
paragraphs of this article, it dawned upon us that all one had
to do was substitute all 105 Legislators in South Dakota for the
criminals cops in paragraphs four and five, and all fits very
well.

To refresh your memory of the
context of the first five paragraphs of that article, we reprint
it word for word in the next paragraph, just as written, followed
by an adaptation of paragraphs four and five to the criminal
Legislators of South Dakota:

"Nineteen people, including five former police
officers, have been criminally charged in connection with a
string of daring and sometimes violent robberies in Southern
California, which were staged to look like law enforcement raids
as the suspects used police badges and equipment to fool
victims, federal authorities said Thursday.

Though the scope of the nearly five-year investigation was first
made public in 2004, new details emerged with the arrests this
week of a California prison guard — taken into custody Thursday
— and of former Los Angeles and Long Beach police officers.
Three other suspects remain at large, authorities said.

The group committed more than 20 robberies and burglaries in Los
Angeles and neighboring communities over a span of 2 1/2 years
until its ringleader, a Los Angeles police officer, was arrested
in 2001 on drug charges.

"What makes this case so disturbing is that the defendants
include five sworn law enforcement officers who abused their
badges, their uniforms and their oaths of office to engage in
criminal conduct under the pretense of conducting real police
operations," said Thomas O'Brien, head of the criminal division
for the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles. "While this story
sounds like a script from 'The Shield' or 'Training Day,' it
actually happened."

Los Angeles Police Chief William J. Bratton focused his comments
on the three former LAPD officers who allegedly were part of the
crew. The officers, he said, "are traitors to the badge that the
men and women of this department so proudly wear, traitors to
their fellow officers and, most importantly, traitors to the
public."

Now for an adaptation of
paragraphs four and five above to South Dakota's criminal
Legislators:

"What makes this case so
disturbing is that the defendants include all one-hundred and
five sworn State Legislators who abused their offices, their public
trust, and their oaths of office to engage in criminal conduct under
the pretense of conducting real legislative operations," said Ron
Branson, head of National J.A.I.L. "While this story sounds like a
script from 'The Shield' or 'Training Day,' it actually happened."

Ron Branson focused his comments on all one-hundred and five South
Dakota State Legislators who were part of the crew. These
Legislators, he said, "are traitors to their offices of legislation,
and traitors to everyone in South Dakota government, and most
importantly, traitors to the public."

Most of you are uninformed that a
formal NOTICE has already been sent via U.S. Mail to all one-hundred
and five State Legislators throughout South Dakota asking them to
cease and desist from their unlawful acts, and to apologize to
everyone in South Dakota. We could not send that U.S. Mail via
internet to everyone on this list because it is fourteen pages in
length, and would require an attachment, which we hesitate to do.
Below is a few paragraphs from that formal NOTICE.

"Thus we must hereby
inform you and put you on NOTICE that your proposed
Resolution, and your subsequent vote on that Resolution, were
clearly unlawful acts by taking sides in an election
contest in an attempt to control and influence the
vote on Amendment “E”, in clear violation of South Dakota
Constitution, Article VI, section 19 – Free and Equal
Elections-Right of Suffrage and Article VII, section 1 –
Right to Vote, as well as South Dakota Attorney General’s
Official Opinion No. 88-28 - Expenditure of Public funds on
Election Issues. Further, that your unlawful acts are
also violations of fundamental rights secured by the United States
Constitution. ....

Gentlemen, this is exactly what Amendment “E” and our actions have
done here and continue to do. However, to the contrary, your
actions fly in the face of Art. VI, sec. 27, show contempt for the
People and Constitution of South Dakota, and make a mockery
of justice, moderation, temperance, frugality and virtue. Your
actions here have irrefutably proven our motto, “Reform never
comes from government, it must always come from the People.”

“Elections shall be free and equal, and no power,
civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent
the free exercise of the right of suffrage. …” [emphasis
added]

Gentlemen, what part of the word “free” don’t you understand? What
part of the words “no power” don’t you understand? What part of the
word “civil” don’t you understand? What part of the word
“interfere” don’t you understand? Your HCR 1004 blatantly states in
its first and last paragraphs:

“A
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Urging the voters of South Dakota
to reject the Judicial Accountability Initiated Law (J.A.I.L.)
which will be submitted to South Dakota voters in November 2006,
designated Amendment E.

*
* *

“NOW,
THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the House of Representatives
Eighty-first Legislature of the State of South Dakota, the Senate
concurring therein, that the South Dakota Legislature strongly
urges all South Dakota voters to protect our citizen boards, to
protect our system of justice, to protect economic development, to
protect all our citizens from frivolous lawsuits that would be
authorized by the Judicial Accountability Initiated Law, and to
vote against Amendment E.[1]

Urging
the voters of South Dakota to reject? Strongly urges all South
Dakota Voters … to vote against Amendment E? Your actions fly in
the face of Art VI, Sec. 19, and thus again you show contempt for
the People of South Dakota and the South Dakota Constitution.
Equally, Art. VII, Sec. 1 – Right to vote, in full states the same
as Art. VI, Sec.19 above. Gentlemen, why do you fail to show
respect for and honor to the People of South Dakota and the sacred
right of suffrage, the right to vote?

Gentlemen, your actions also fly directly in the face and authority
of our own South Dakota Attorney General's Official Opinion No.
88-28 - Expenditure of Public Funds on Election Issues, issued June
29, 1988, ....

As
such, we hereby formally request that you promptly,
individually, and collectively (the entire House and Senate)
reconsider your vote, and formally and publicly withdraw HCR 1004.
We further formally request, that you publicly (in
newspapers, radio, television and on official websites) apologize to
the citizens of the State of South Dakota, for using your offices
and public funds to interfere to prevent the free exercise of the
PUBLIC’s right of suffrage (to vote), either for or against
Amendment “E”. We request that this action on your part be taken
and accomplished promptly, no later than March 10, 2006, so
as to quickly stop and mitigate the damage you have wrought to a
free and equal election process.

Besides being blatantly in violation
of the law and your oaths of office to follow the law, your actions
smack of an imperial arrogance, an abuse of your office and power
(loaned to you by the People), a fundamental failure to understand
that you are servants of the People and of an outright contempt for
the People you represent. ....

What's more, these South Dakota
Legislators have violated clear statutory South Dakota law, to wit,

"Publication of false or erroneous
information on constitutional amendment or submitted question as
misdemeanor.
Any person knowingly printing, publishing, or delivering to any
voter of this state a document containing any purported
constitutional amendment, question, law, or measure to be submitted
to the voters at any election, in which such constitutional
amendment, question, law, or measure is misstated, erroneously
printed, or by which false or misleading information is given to the
voters, is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor."

Simply put, this statute provides
that every South Dakota Legislator in this instance of Amendment
E is subject to arrest, detention for trial before a jury on
the evidence, conviction, and sentencing to incarceration.

There exists several options
here, which we do not now wish to enumerate. However, should you
wish to offer recommendations as to how this statewide conspiracy
and criminal scandal should be handled, we will be glad to consider
your recommendations. Please know that the potential for conflicts
of interest involved here are extremely staggering, and raises the
question of who is innocent and who is not conflicted? This is the
thing that media frenzies are made up of, and is bound to draw the
attention of the entire nation as something heretofore unheard of in
the possibilities of an entire state legislature being arrested.