"A massive, highly sophisticated piece of malware has been newly found infecting systems in Iran and elsewhere and is believed to be part of a well-coordinated, ongoing, state-run cyberespionage operation. The malware, discovered by Russia-based anti-virus firm Kaspersky Lab, is an espionage toolkit that has been infecting targeted systems in Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Sudan, the Israeli Occupied Territories and other countries in the Middle East and North Africa for at least two years. Dubbed 'Flame' by Kaspersky, the malicious code dwarfs Stuxnet in size." Since I'm not particularly well-versed in the subject, maybe someone can answer this question for me: if country A creates a malware infection like this to spy on and/or harm computers in country B, can it be construed as an act of war under existing international law?

And I still can't figure out why European's hatred of America and Israel makes them side with those who openly state death to all non Muslims and the objective of turning Europe into a Sharia governed Caliphate.

...wat?

I dislike all acts of aggression, and let's face it, us westerners don't have a particularly clean track record there. How many nations has Iran invaded?

I didn't say Iran invaded anyone (though Iran's Hezbollah militia have taken over Lebanon effectively making it occupied Iranian territory). Iran does arm Shiite groups throughout the Middle East who do carry out attacks on Sunni civilians.

Where in Western countries like the U.S. there is at least an internal debate on how moral their actions are and no intentional killing of civilians, Iran officially supports the spread of Shiite beliefs through violence against civilians. And this is what give the U.S. the moral high ground.