Abstract

Since both the second‐order transition temperature and the tensile strength of plasticized polymers decrease linearly with plasticizer content, and frequently in inverse proportion to the molecular weight of the plasticizer, it was predicted that a linear relationship should exist between tensile strength and transition temperature for plasticized polymers, independent of the nature of the plasticizer. Tensile strength versus heat distortion for four different plasticizers in polystyrene follows this prediction very well. However, tensile strength versus brittle temperature for plasticized Vinylite VYNW gives a different straight line for each plasticizer. It is suggested that the diffusion rate of a plasticizer molecule is important in the fast brittle point test. The hypothesis is proposed that the brittle temperature of a plasticized polymer represents an isodiffusion constant state. It follows on the basis of some semi‐empirical equations that the brittle temperature should decrease linearly with plasticizer content, and inversely as the activation energy for diffusion of the plasticizer molecule in the plasticized polymer. This latter prediction appears in accord with existing data. This diffusion concept allows one to predict that the brittle temperature should increase linearly with logarithm of frequency of the test, but inversely as the activation energy for diffusion.