Uh, no. No, it wasn't. I read that book when it first came out and a) the bare belly was gone within a couple of issues, b) Chris Claremont fought the stupid scarf until Marvel let him remove it, and c) SHE WAS NEVER "MISS" MARVEL, SHE WAS MS. MARVEL FROM THE BEGINNING!!!!!

Good GOD. If you're going to bother drawing a character, GET IT RIGHT!!!!!!

I agree, while I find all your work beautiful you have a definite aesthetic that you follow in your portrayal of female beauty. Your women are almost invariably busty, accordingly broad-shouldered to support said mammaries but with slim hips, if their thighs were more developed they would seem to be shaped like gymnasts. Perhaps the rationale is that a super-heroine would have more athletic proportions to suit their heroic endeavors as opposed to hourglass eye-candy that seems impractical for crime fighting. I don't know, just a thought, and I understand that when the pen or pencil is in hand we generally end up drawing what we want to see more than anything else. Within the confines of the page it's our world but my mind would be blown to see you do an image based on an Alexis Texas or Angela White type physique...

This is as what I've always come to expect from you and your original style AWESOME! Can always spot your art. Funny though last time I got asked to do a commission it was for ms. marvel in her original costume too. (they still wanted the bob) Not that I'm comparing! I couldn't hold a match (yeah that's right not even a candle) to you.