A Royal Row

“Scientist urges teaching of creationism in schools” blared headlines after
the director of education at the U.K.’s Royal Society merely suggested that
teachers be allowed to discuss creationism in science lessons, if students raise
the issue. Days later, the biologist Michael Reiss was forced to resign.

Under attack from other Royal Society fellows—who argued that Reiss’s affiliation
with the Church of England invalidated his scientific credentials—Reiss asserted
that “creationism has no scientific basis.” Yet soon after, the embattled Reiss
resigned his Royal Society position.

By attacking one of their own, staunch evolutionists remind us that Darwinian
theory can’t stand competition, not even legitimate questions from students.

Answers Magazine

January – March 2009

2009 is “the year of Darwin”— the 200th anniversary of his birth and the 150th anniversary of The Origin of Species. Learn what drove this man to develop his controversial belief system and read leading creationists as they share what we’ve discovered after 150 years of analyzing Darwin’s “dangerous idea.”

Risk-free trial issue!

First name:

Last name:

Email:

Address:

Address2:

City:

State:

Zip:

Leave unfilled:

If you decide you want to keep Answers coming, simply pay your invoice for just $24 and receive four issues (a full year) more. If not, write “cancel” across the invoice and return it. The trial issue is yours to keep, regardless!

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery.
New subscribers only. No gift subscriptions.Offer valid in U.S. only.