his lack of character. "The only thing that matters I think is the nominee's skills as a judge and expertise in the Constitution and SCOTUS rulings." I'm sorry, but before we get to whether he can read, we should establish his character to STAND IN JUDGEMENT OF OTHERS. I don't expect perfection. I expect an honest answer to a question. I don't expect you lie because an honest answer maybe doesn't make you look like the swell guy that doesn't make back office deals. You're riding the wrong nag IMO.

under oath? At the very least, deliberate obfuscation and misrepresentation. He denied seeing “any documents that appeared to you to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the... more

which to me means that the allegations are being made in bad faith which leads me to believe that the allegers are lacking in candor as well. Bottomline, the accusations amount to he said - she said... more

and they were NOT addressed in your article whatsoever. Granted, there were some allegations made that had ZERO evidence to support them, but the ones I cited were NOT amongst them. The National... more

himself, flat out lying, a 'he said she said'. He's lied repeatedly, and he's a part of the corrupt machine. His opines regarding the Roe v Wade are being questioned. I don't get your arguments at... more

group that I noted. The ones I noted are factual and indisputable that they happened. The only wiggle room is whether or not he was deceptively parsing his words to deliberately mislead those at the... more

their opinion? I'm rebutting yours. Now it is your turn. Rebut the fact his statements are contrary to his existing emails. Not in one instance, but in several. And that's just what's been leaked. He ... more

If you have an opinion that requires actual sourcing and proof to support it, then it is expected that you'll provide it and NOT simply post inflammatory remarks designed to TROLL and nothing more.... more