tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3542133141521494202019-02-01T09:23:24.550-08:00REEL CONSERVATIVEMovie recommendations for the Christian familyJon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.comBlogger126125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-83236175753528698922018-11-22T03:46:00.000-08:002018-12-20T16:05:28.577-08:00I Survived I Kissed Dating Goodbye<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>Documentary<br />77 minutes / 2018<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-66nJ81-VYog/W_aX1oODynI/AAAAAAAAC7M/EaCn28wDWeEoQusEHg4Ehy6-SSKDhKhKACLcBGAs/s1600/I-survived.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="388" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-66nJ81-VYog/W_aX1oODynI/AAAAAAAAC7M/EaCn28wDWeEoQusEHg4Ehy6-SSKDhKhKACLcBGAs/s320/I-survived.jpg" width="221" /></a></div><b>RATING: 8/10</b><br /><br />Twenty-one years ago the then 21-year-old Joshua Harris struck a nerve with his book&nbsp;<i>I Kissed Dating Goodbye. </i>It was written for Christian young people by a Christian young person, on a topic that every young person was interested in – how to find that special someone. It sold more than 1.2 million copies and was a big part of a purity movement within the Church that helped shape the way a generation of Christians thought about sex, dating, and looking for a spouse.<br /><br />Fast forward to today, and in a just-released documentary the now 42-year-old author revisits his book and meets Christians who were impacted by it, for good, but also for ill. With a title like&nbsp;<i>I Survived "I Kissed Dating Goodbye" </i>it's no surprise that the documentary presents a rather negative overall assessment of the book. Early on Harris's wife Shannon puts it this way:<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">"I think it was a good book, and a well-intentioned book...well, I don't know that I can say it was a good book. But it was a well-intentioned book."</blockquote>So why watch a documentary about seemingly-not-so-good&nbsp;20-year-old book? Because the film is about much more than a single book. It tackles the Purity Movement overall, and more specifically, what it got wrong.<br /><br />Of course, the Purity Movement got a lot right – hey, they want young people to abstain from sex until marriage, and that's even in the Bible! But it's because the Purity Movement seems so obviously good, that the unveiling of their errors is so instructive. As Spurgeon once&nbsp;noted,&nbsp;discernment isn't the ability to tell right from wrong, but rather to tell right from almost right. The Purity Movement <i>is</i>&nbsp;almost right – if we weren't worried about grammar Nazis we might say they are so very, nearly, almost right.<br /><br />So if we can learn to spot <i>their</i> mistakes, then we'll be able to apply that lesson to most any other well-intentioned, but similarly misguided Christian movement.<br /><br /><b>The book and how it is misremembered</b><br /><br />While I love the documentary, my one big criticism would be that it isn't fair to the book. If you just watched the documentary and hadn't ever read&nbsp;<i>I Kissed Dating Goodbye</i>&nbsp;you would think it was completely against dating, and all about courtship.<br /><br />But after rereading it this week I would describe it as a strong condemnation of dating&nbsp;<i>as it was commonly being done in the Church.&nbsp;</i>Harris was against the recreational dating that had guys and girls paired up quickly, intensely, and most often briefly, with the focus on pleasure or prestige, and no thought spent on how to honor God through dating.<br /><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xhy8HeywoxU/W_aWer1LUDI/AAAAAAAAC7A/Kkt7UnzCcrkFOeeZU-nHpX2q_PL8H8YywCLcBGAs/s1600/I-kissed-dating-goodbye.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="354" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xhy8HeywoxU/W_aWer1LUDI/AAAAAAAAC7A/Kkt7UnzCcrkFOeeZU-nHpX2q_PL8H8YywCLcBGAs/s320/I-kissed-dating-goodbye.jpg" width="202" /></a>He was cautioning against teenagers experiencing too much too soon: too much physical intimacy, too much emotional intimacy, paired with too much immaturity – selfish and uncommitted kids pressuring each other to go further and further. Harris was speaking against turning girlfriends and boyfriends and dating and sex into idols that push God out of His proper place as first and foremost in our hearts.<br /><br />But in taking a stand against an Archie Andrews-type of dating, was Harris pushing the courtship model?<br /><br />Well, there's courtship and then there's courtship. Under one definition, courtship would require a man to first ask a woman's father before he could take her out on a first date. But a broader definition would define courtship as dating done with the specific intent of seeking a marriage partner – dating that isn't done just for fun – and conducted with some level of parental involvement/supervision.<br /><br />In&nbsp;<i>I Kissed Dating Goodbye&nbsp;</i>Harris does encourage more parental involvement, and also intentional, marriage-focussed dating. But the book spends far more space highlighting all that's wrong with modern dating than it spends prescribing a cure. And when it does come to presenting the alternative, Harris is more about general and often clearly biblical principles, than any specific outworking of those principles. He argues at one point:<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">The Bible doesn't provide a one-size-fits-all program for moving from friendship to marriage. Our lives are too different, our circumstances too unique, and our God too creative to have only one formula for romance.&nbsp;</blockquote>While a lot of what he says does align with a courtship model, Harris simply wasn't pushing that model as hard as his critics in the documentary make it seem.</div><br /><b>The Purity Movement's false gods</b><br /><br />In the documentary, the book serves as the leap-off point for a look at the Purity Movement. It turns out it wasn't just reckless, immature kids who were turning sex into an idol. Strangely enough, the Purity Movement was doing it too.<br /><br /><i>I Survived "I Kissed Dating Goodbye"</i>&nbsp;begins with Harris traveling to Washington&nbsp;DC, where he recalls a 1994 conference he attended there with 25,000 other young Christians. A part of the conference was a "True Love Waits" rally. With rubber mallets in hand, young people staked more than 200,000 True Love Waits commitment cards into the lawn of the Washington Mall. These commitment cards read:<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">Believing that true love waits, I make a commitment to God, myself, my family, my friends, my future mate&nbsp;and&nbsp;my future children to be sexually abstinent from this day until the day I enter a biblical marriage relationship.</blockquote>As good as that sounds, there's a hint here of the Purity Movement's big mistake. It comes down to one question: Who, or what, is the god here? Calvin noted it is in man's nature to perpetually be manufacturing one new idol after another – we continually put this god and that in God's place. So in this pledge who or what is the "god"? Is it God? No. He's only one of several this commitment is being made to. But this commitment is being made in service to a very specific desired outcome: the securing of true love. That's the "god" here.<br /><br />In a conversation with Christine Gardner, author of <i>Making Chastity Sexy, </i>Harris discusses how the Purity Movement sold abstinence, not so much as a way to please God, but as the way to secure the very best sort of sex. There's truth to what they were saying: studies have shown that on average married people enjoy sex more than sexually active unmarried people - married sex <i>is</i> best. But while "great married sex" can be <i>a </i>reason to stay abstinent, there's a problem when it becomes&nbsp;<i>the </i>reason. The Purity Movement lost&nbsp;its way when it started placing something – even fantastic married sex – ahead of God.<br /><br /><b>False gods and false guilt</b><br /><br />In setting up a variety of false gods, the Purity Movement also caused people a lot of false guilt. As my wife put it, false guilt happens when we sin against, not God, but the idols we've made.<br /><br />These idols of our own making are often entirely unforgiving. Consider the idol some have made out of maintaining their virginity. Serving this god, they've been told, is the way they can secure the spouse of their dreams (false gods always offer some version of the prosperity doctrine – serve your god in just the way it asks, and you can force it to give you what you ask).<br /><br />But what of the boy or girl who has lost their virginity? What offering can be given, what forgiveness can be had from this god? You can't become a virgin again. No wonder then, that the followers of this god feel unrelenting guilt – where no forgiveness can be had, guilt remains.<br /><br />Isn't it amazing that we keep setting up these false gods? They bring us only misery and guilt, while the one true God offers us real forgiveness....and we don't have to earn it!<br /><br /><b>Conclusion</b><br /><br />Of course, false gods and false guilt aren't limited to the Purity Movement: money, career advancement, exercise goals, new year's resolutions, the spotless home, the perfectly behaved child – all of&nbsp;them&nbsp;can become idols of our own making. That, then, is what makes this is a must-see documentary. The discernment it fosters is desperately needed in every sphere of life.<br /><br />More could be said: the film also explores legalism, and critiques how Christians will often treat certain books as if they were on par with the Bible itself. And while I have a far greater appreciation for <i>I Kissed Dating Goodbye </i>than the author seems to at this point – the film concludes by noting that Harris and the publisher have agreed to stop publishing <i>I Kissed Dating Goodbye</i> – I'd agree there are some notable flaws....but nothing that would keep me from sharing and discussing it with my own daughters.<br /><br />And I'll be just as enthused to share this film with them, knowing it will be a springboard to all sorts of great conversations.<br /><br /><i>I Survived "I Kissed Dating Goodbye"</i> can be&nbsp;<a href="http://www.explorationfilms.com/survived/index2.php" target="_blank">watched for free here</a>&nbsp;if you're willing to give your first name and email and sign up for their newsletter (which, I presume, you can unsubscribe from at any time). Otherwise you can <a href="https://www.reelhouse.org/explorationfilms/i-survived-i-kissed-dating-goodbye" target="_blank">rent it for $4.99 here</a>.<br /><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/298046316" width="500"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-63976325970637525372018-10-03T18:41:00.003-07:002018-10-08T09:38:27.059-07:00Swallows and Amazons<div><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-czXcDssraqA/W7T6SkrXJsI/AAAAAAAAC4M/Px5oEWA4nyMPtPRwX7EfMS5VAv19yJ5aQCLcBGAs/s1600/Swallows-and-Amazons.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="840" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-czXcDssraqA/W7T6SkrXJsI/AAAAAAAAC4M/Px5oEWA4nyMPtPRwX7EfMS5VAv19yJ5aQCLcBGAs/s320/Swallows-and-Amazons.jpg" width="213" /></a>Drama / Family</div>2016 / 96 minutes<br /><div><b>RATING: 7/10</b></div><div><br /></div><div>I remember my older brother reading Arthur Ransome's&nbsp;<i>Swallows and Amazons</i>&nbsp;to me when I was very young, and being charmed by it. It was a story of four children - two brothers and their two sisters – making up their own adventures during a summer holiday on the lake, fighting off imaginary pirates and pretend sharks. It was a gentle book.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>That's why I thought it would make for a gentle movie to share with the family. But while a lot of the book's charm made it to the silver screen, the filmmakers decided that in addition to the children's imagined peril, they had to add some of the real kind – spies!<br /><br />The four Walker children are on a lake for the summer, in 1935 Britain, and they have their parents' permission to take the <i>Swallow</i>, a small sailboat, out to explore a densely wooded island and camp there. But they are not the first to land on the island: a sign, surrounded by animal bones, warns that it belongs to the "Amazons." This is all loyal to the book – the Amazons are a couple of girls with a sailboat of their own, and the two groups get to pretend to be rival pirate gangs. But the island is also home to a real life spy. And there are a couple of other suspicious sorts following him. For a small little island, there's quite the population on it!<br /><br />The additions of the spies adds to the excitement, but brings tension to a story that didn't really have that before. So, if you like the book, you probably aren't going to appreciate this adaptation – it's akin to adding a couple of spies to Winnie-the-Pooh. Exciting, yes, but not at all in keeping with the spirit of the original story.<br /><br />However, if you don't know the book, or can at least forget it for a bit, this <i>is</i> quite the adventure. There are chases scenes on the water and through the woods, and even through and on top of a train. We see spies following each other, Walkers following spies, and spies following the Walkers. I don't want to give the impression this is all action – there's also the calmer fun of the Walkers learning how to camp, create fire, and catch and cook their own food. It still has the charm of the book.<br /><br />Just with tension added.<br /><br /><b>CAUTION</b><br /><br />There is a bit of language, with one spy saying "Damn it" in his native language, and the movie not so helpfully subtitling the translation for us. The siblings also call each other various names including "duffer" and "idiot." And one girl says, "shut up" a number of times.<br /><br />The only other concern would be some behaviors that we wouldn't want our own children to model. There are a few times where the children do something hazardous (like sailing a boat at night) against their mother's expressed wishes. So mom and dad might have to pause the movie here and there to ask what the Walker children <i>should</i> have done.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />While <i>Swallows and Amazons</i> was far too scary for my 8 and under young'uns, I think some 10-year-olds and anyone 12 and up would find this just the right level of exciting for them. It's great movie night material for families with older children, and it's bound to inspire either a camping or sailing request.</div><div><br /></div><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EWkPCRjNyqM" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-25582586886489001032018-10-02T01:05:00.000-07:002018-10-05T10:31:32.904-07:00Desperate Journey<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9-aTFKwHeWE/W7MbrfrCaOI/AAAAAAAAC3w/DQmkgAW3DhMxcJlAXgGQOTmmEl2Rc67TgCLcBGAs/s1600/Desperate%2BJourney.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="370" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9-aTFKwHeWE/W7MbrfrCaOI/AAAAAAAAC3w/DQmkgAW3DhMxcJlAXgGQOTmmEl2Rc67TgCLcBGAs/s320/Desperate%2BJourney.jpg" width="211" /></a>Black and White / War / Drama<br />107 minutes / 1942<br />RATING: 7/10<br /><br />Ronald Reagan and Errol Flynn are two members of a Allied bombing crew assigned a near-impossible mission over Nazi Germany. When their plane is shot down, they set out to make it home again....and to do as much damage to the Nazis as they can along the way.<br /><br />Their desperate journey has plenty of explosions, fisticuffs, arial shootouts, guns blazing, and, at one point, Errol Flynn diving through a window to tackle two Nazi guards at once. There are laughs too, especially when the crew has the chutzpah to steal a ride on Nazi leader Hermann Göring's private train car.<br /><i><br /></i><i>Desperate Journey&nbsp;</i>is jingoistic, and at times not so realistic (ie. the real Nazis were smarter than movie Nazis) but it has an authenticity to it that comes of being made during World War II. This film was<i>&nbsp;part of the war effort,&nbsp;</i>made to encourage those back home that not only were we in the right, but that Australians, Brits, Americans and more could come together as a team to outsmart and beat back the Nazis.<br /><br /><b>Caution</b><br /><b><br /></b>As the crew is chased across Germany it isn't surprising that there are casualties along the way. And while there is no real gore, those losses make this a film that children could find too dramatic and emotional for them to deal with. So this might be best for 12 and up.<br /><b><br /></b><b>Conclusion</b><br /><br />I watched this with a group ranging in age from 40 to just shy of 80, and all eight of us enjoyed it. If you have any sort of appreciation for World War II films made <i>during </i>World War II, this is one of the especially fun ones.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/raPNZc5ehYM" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-14609021393318191382018-09-10T17:19:00.000-07:002018-09-10T21:17:01.830-07:00The Boxcar Children: Surprise Island<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lgPx5235Rnk/W5cGb3f18PI/AAAAAAAAC1w/g2LUu6QOkLYcrJB6_1zgEfgGww5iTY-uQCLcBGAs/s1600/boxcar-children--surprise-island.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="788" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lgPx5235Rnk/W5cGb3f18PI/AAAAAAAAC1w/g2LUu6QOkLYcrJB6_1zgEfgGww5iTY-uQCLcBGAs/s320/boxcar-children--surprise-island.jpg" width="227" /></a>Animated / Children<br />82 minutes / 2018<br />RATING: 6 out of 10<br /><br />My kids loved this - we rented it for two nights, and they asked to watch it twice. So why give it just a 6 rating? Because what makes it attractive to gentle, easily scared, children is also what makes it a below average film: there is <i>no</i> conflict.<br /><br />Summer vacation has arrived, and Grandfather Alden wants to take his four grandchildren to an island their family owns. He leaves them there, and with the exception of a couple minutes when the children are trapped in a cave just as the tide comes in, this is an entirely calm film. Grandfather Alden leaves them on the island alone, but the only other "danger" they have to deal with is a leaky roof.<br /><br />This is a sequel to the slightly better 2013 film&nbsp;<i><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/01/the-boxcar-children.html" target="_blank">The Boxcar Children</a>.</i>&nbsp;Both movies are based on the beloved 150+ book series originated by Gertrude Chandler Warner way back in 1924. According to the bonus features on this DVD, Warner set out to make a story for Grade 1 and 2 students that would use the 100 most important words for them to learn. I found that rather telling – it makes the books out to be more about learning vocabulary than presenting kids with a rip-roaring adventure. And if that was her intent, she has succeeded.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />The only caution I can think to include is that the movies make no mention of God (Heaven comes up once, but not God) and on such a beautiful island, where it would be hard not to sing His praises, His absence is felt (by adults, anyway). In the series a brief reference to evolution pops up in every second or third book, and that, along with God's absence in the books and films, makes me suspect that author Gertrude Warner was probably not a Christian.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />So far I'm not exactly singing the praises of the book series, or this, the latest film based on them. So why recommend the movie at all?<br /><br />Because, for younger kids, particularly those who are familiar with the Boxcar Children already, they will absolutely love it. My critique of the book and this movie is not that there is anything <i>wrong</i> with them; it's only that there is nothing remarkable about them. The acting is okay, the animation is middling, and the story, from a parental perspective, is on the boring side.<br /><br />But on the other hand, there are no language, violence, sexuality, or other concerns. And young children, up to maybe 10 years old, will enjoy the familiar characters and the cozy comfy safety of this no-conflict story. It is a nice safe film for your family movie night.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0CrmRHrQvFI" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-44838576080607544602018-07-27T00:38:00.000-07:002018-07-27T08:53:21.918-07:00The Sea Hawk<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kqZCUXVzaIQ/VsYZxfJlzkI/AAAAAAAABOE/VrieWREm4Aw/s1600/Sea%2BHawk.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kqZCUXVzaIQ/VsYZxfJlzkI/AAAAAAAABOE/VrieWREm4Aw/s320/Sea%2BHawk.jpg" width="225" /></a>Drama / Action<br />109 minutes / 1940<br /><b>RATING: 8/10</b><br /><div><br /></div>While <i>The Sea Hawk </i>is set in 1585, and pitches Spain against England, this film was all about the politics of its day. Spain is clearly a stand-in for the Germany of 1940, and King Phillip could only have been more Hitler-esque if they had given him the small patch mustache.<br /><br />The story begins with Phillip laying out his plans for world domination. He demands from England that they refrain from building a fleet and offers his friendship, if they give in to his demands. Queen Elizabeth does her very best Chamberlain imitation, refusing to prepare for the clearly hostile Spain. She chooses to appease the tyrant, even as Phillip is building an armada.<br /><br />Then there is Captain Thorpe (Errol Flynn) with his own stand-in role. He has his own ship, which is part of an English privateer fleet, the Seahawks. Even as Elizabeth appeases Phillip, the Seahawks raid Spanish towns and sink Spanish ships. Thorpe is channeling at least a little Churchill, urging the queen – and through her, the nation of England – to prepare for war.<br /><br />That makes this film fascinating on two very different levels. It is a fantastic swashbuckling film all on its own, and it is also a wonderful bit of anti-Nazi propaganda, intended to rally the nation to resist. Queen Elizabeth concludes the film with a speech that is a clear call for America to come join the war.<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">"When the ruthless ambitions of a man threaten to engulf the world, it becomes the solemn obligation of all free men to affirm that the earth belongs not to any one man, but to all men."</blockquote><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />There is a lot of fighting, with folks getting stabbed and shot. But there is no gore.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />I had an opportunity to watch&nbsp;<i>The Sea Hawk</i>&nbsp;with a group of friends who, as a general rule, don't watch black and white films. A few exchanges struck them as a bit corny – acting in the 1940s did sometimes take a melodramatic turn – but the swashbuckling action and the self-sacrificial hero, the Second World War subtext, well, it swept away all their resistance. They simply couldn't help themselves: they had to love it!<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3wUkq6JBoMQ" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-89121240663201712042018-07-26T15:49:00.000-07:002018-07-26T16:07:38.013-07:00Born free<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-m70EeLliKmo/W1pFVgykqHI/AAAAAAAAC0M/qERU285EiGQhHoSfL9h5uk9biogPUyPRgCLcBGAs/s1600/Born-free.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="840" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-m70EeLliKmo/W1pFVgykqHI/AAAAAAAAC0M/qERU285EiGQhHoSfL9h5uk9biogPUyPRgCLcBGAs/s320/Born-free.jpg" width="213" /></a>Family / Drama<br />1966 / 95 minutes<br />RATING 8/10<br /><br />When a man-eating lion has to be shot, and his mate too, three little cubs are left as orphans. Game warden George Adamson takes them back to his wife Joy, and their home.<br /><br />As you might expect, three wild lion cubs can get into all sorts of hijinks when they're kept inside. Seeing Elsa, Lustica, and Big One bound on the furniture, and on the Adamsons will be a favorite part for many younger viewers.<br /><br />The Adamsons raise the triplets until they are too big to manage, and then send two to the Netherlands Rotterdam Zoo. But Elsa, the runt of the litter, ends up staying with them....until it become impossible to keep her too. But how can they send Elsa off to a zoo when all she's known was the wide spaces of the game reserve? The couple hatches a plan to teach their Elsa how to hunt and survive in the wild.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />The story begins with a woman, busy washing her clothes in the river, getting attacked by a lion. We see only the lion charging, the woman shriek and put up her hands, but not the attack itself. Afterwards a shot of the river shows blood flowing by. While this opening scene is too scary for young children, if parents fast-forwarded that bit (explaining, rather than showing, what happens) the rest of the film could probably be viewed by most children 8 or 9 and up.<br /><br />A 1-minute scene (in the last 10 minutes of the film) of one lion fighting another might also be too intense for young viewers.<br /><br />Language concerns include one instance of "damn it" but nothing else.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />In children's entertainment, whenever Nature or the environmentalism is addressed, Man is most often portrayed as a curse on creation rather than as a caretaker of it (think <i>Bambi, Ferngully, The Lorax, </i>etc.). But in <i>Born free </i>the Adamsons are games wardens, responsible for the care and management of creatures. We might question some of their priorities (when the Elsa stampedes an elephant troop into a village that should have been reason enough to send her away to a zoo). But overall, in <i>Born free</i> Man's management role is assumed - the Adamsons are exercising dominion (Genesis 1:28). That makes this film a counter to some of the unbiblical environmental propaganda children will encounter, particularly if mom or dad use it as a conversation starter.<br /><br />Based on a true story, <i>Born free&nbsp;</i>is simply enchanting. Some of that is due to the on location shooting in Africa, as well as the Oscar-winning score. But the scene-stealers are the lions, especially when the three sisters are all cubs getting into laugh-out loud mischief. Whether you are a cat person or not, watching these beautiful creatures jump and play and hunt will have you in awe of the Creator who crafted them.<br /><br /><i>Born Free</i> is a film that all ages will enjoy...so long as parents note the warnings above.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/e1wpbCbPP7U" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-87289895442267727632018-07-25T10:46:00.000-07:002018-07-26T15:51:12.645-07:00The man who shot Liberty Valance<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EQGP-blLpsY/W1oGaDVTYII/AAAAAAAACz0/7gvPw6qq-YgmHojU6mWQ4f-wR7h0fTejQCLcBGAs/s1600/Liberty-Valance.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="739" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-EQGP-blLpsY/W1oGaDVTYII/AAAAAAAACz0/7gvPw6qq-YgmHojU6mWQ4f-wR7h0fTejQCLcBGAs/s320/Liberty-Valance.jpg" width="242" /></a>Western / Black and White<br />1962 / 123 minutes<br />RATING 8/10<br /><br />What does it mean to be a man? In this classic Western, Hollywood offers up two answers.<br /><br />Tom Doniphon (John Wayne) is a successful horse rancher living just outside the town of Shinbone who prides himself on not needing anyone and not fearing anyone. He solves his own problems, and figures that everyone else should do the same. Self-reliant - that, in his mind, is what makes a man a real man.<br /><br />Ransom Stoddard (Jimmy Stewart) is a lawyer, newly arrived to Shinbone who starts a school for both children and adults when he discovers that most can't read. He wants to bring law and order to town, but via the law book, and not the gun barrel, and that makes him naive. But he's also principled and caring, and that, in his mind, is what makes a man a man.<br /><br />To put both these models of manhood to the test, we have Liberty Valance, a bully and a killer. He and his gang do whatever they want, and none of the town folk dare stop him. Doniphon could stop him... but that would be solving other people's problems for them. Ransom wants to stop him... but he'll need more than just his law books.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />This is an all-time classic that everyone will enjoy...if they have the patience for it. It starts off slow, and the pacing throughout is far more relaxed than anything a modern viewer is used to. If it were made today, they would cut at least a half hour. But, if you go in understanding that, then this will be a grand film.<br /><br />It's the nature of Western to have some violence in them, but in this one a lot of it occurs offscreen, though just barely so, as when Ransom is whipped. Onscreen we see a manic Liberty striking furiously, but Ransom is just below the frame, so we don't see the blows land. A couple people are shot, but without any real gore.<br /><br />The only language concerns would be one use of "damn"<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><b><br /></b>If your children regularly watch TV then the pace of this film will be too slow to keep their interest. But otherwise this would be a classic worth sharing with the family including children maybe 10 years old and up. It's good fodder for a discussion about the difference between Hollywood's ideal man, and the type of man God calls us to be in passages like <a href="https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ephesians+5%3A21-33&amp;version=NASB" target="_blank">Ephesians 5:21-33</a>.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bN0onE09-8c" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-11924320516105380182018-07-06T00:30:00.000-07:002018-07-06T10:54:21.772-07:00The Cameraman<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HqnEjBHWA-U/Wz6CiYmUX7I/AAAAAAAACys/bCk9r54UEQYyTXSBPRa5ZKfuR5UsB-VYgCLcBGAs/s1600/The-cameraman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="850" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HqnEjBHWA-U/Wz6CiYmUX7I/AAAAAAAACys/bCk9r54UEQYyTXSBPRa5ZKfuR5UsB-VYgCLcBGAs/s320/The-cameraman.jpg" width="210" /></a>Silent film / Comedy<br />1928 / 76 minutes<br />RATING 7/10<br /><br />Buster Keaton is a down on his luck tin-type cameraman. The film takes place in the 1920s, when photos are still a rarity and Buster makes his money taking portraits of passersby on the street for ten cents each. The story begins when Buster has a chance encounter with Sally, the receptionist at a newsreel company's office. To impress her he trades in his tin-type camera for a hand-cranked motion picture and heads off to find some news to film.<br /><br />It takes Buster a bit of time to get the hang of things but his failures are entertaining, and Sally appreciates the effort. However, just as she's warming up to him, and Buster is figuring out how to run his camera, the villain of the piece – an already established news cameraman – arrives to break up the not-yet-a-couple. Nothing is ever easy for Buster!<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />There are a few cautions for this film that make it less than ideal viewing for the youngest viewers.<br /><br />Buster first encounters Sally when a huge crowd crushes them into each other, with Buster stuck behind her, his nose buried in her hair. This takes the ridiculous love-at-first-sight trope, and turns it into a slightly creepy love-at-first-<i>smell</i>. Fortunately this is only a brief bit.<br /><br />There is one "naughty" joke, involving Buster and Sally on their first date to a public swimming pool, Buster ends up in an oversized swimsuit. To impress Sally he heads to the diving board and, of course, ends up diving right out of his suit...though he doesn't immediately realize. To solve his dilemma he divests a woman in a large of swimsuit dress (right down to mid-calf) of her accompanying swim-pants, which he then wears on his way out of the pool. It's best not to think just how he pulled off that stunt (and the film doesn't spend any time on it).<br /><br />Younger viewers might be shocked at the sudden apparent death of a small monkey that Buster falls on (but later we discover the little guy is okay). A scene in which a police officer tests Keaton's reactions by hitting his knee – and Buster returns in kind – might also be distressing to younger viewers who know that's not how you treat policemen!<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />MGM loved this film so much it was required viewing for all its comedy filmmakers. And no wonder! Like Keaton's other films, this one <i>abounds</i> in stunts and visual jokes, but it probably has the very best – though most abrupt – ending of them all. <br /><br />So my take is, <i>The Cameraman</i>&nbsp;is a fun film but recommended only for older family members who understand that Buster Keaton is not always to be imitated.<br /><br />&nbsp; <iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2H8dS-z8NHM" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-82705413271610785612018-07-05T12:18:00.001-07:002018-07-05T12:22:35.803-07:00The Spirit of St. Louis<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Ga5-QOz6UJI/Wz5m3bzbEfI/AAAAAAAACyU/m8MrIUZUKxIaNV9tTiIYDFxlgfZXH0JgACLcBGAs/s1600/Spirit-of-St-Louis.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="804" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Ga5-QOz6UJI/Wz5m3bzbEfI/AAAAAAAACyU/m8MrIUZUKxIaNV9tTiIYDFxlgfZXH0JgACLcBGAs/s320/Spirit-of-St-Louis.jpg" width="222" /></a>Family / Biography<br />1957 / 135 minutes<br />RATING 7/10<br /><br />Charles Lindbergh's 1927 flight wasn't the first to cross the North Atlantic. That was accomplished 8 years earlier, in May of 1919, by a crew of United States Navy aviators flying in a biplane equipped with floats. The floats were so it could land on the water, which it did a number of times to give the crew time for repairs and rest. Their flight, from New York State to Lisbon, Portugal took 19 days.<br /><br />That flight has largely been forgotten because it was eclipsed, just two weeks later, by a pair of British aviators, John Alcock and Arthur Brown, teaming up to make the first <i>non-stop</i> flight across the Atlantic. They took a far shorter route, flying from Newfoundland, to Ireland. Their biplane managed the journey in just under 16 hours, crash-landing in a bog the pilots mistook for a suitable landing field. Both men were unharmed.<br /><br />So why is Charles Lindbergh's crossing the one best remembered? One reason was the $25,000 Orteig Prize for the first successful non-stop flight from New York to Paris. It had been offered since 1919, but despite a number of efforts over the next 8 years, no one had yet managed to claim it. Another reason was that Lindbergh's flight was the first&nbsp;<i>solo </i>flight across the Atlantic. And the third reason is related to the first – by flying between two major international cities, New York and Paris, Lindbergh's flight showed the world that commercial aviation was a real possibility. Just a dozen years later the first commercial transatlantic flights began.<br /><br />But enough history, how was the film?<br /><br />Well, if you like Jimmy Stewart, or appreciate biographical films, or enjoy learning even as you're entertained, or have wanted to know more about Charles Lindbergh, or wanted a nice family film, then you're sure to enjoy <i>The Spirit of St. Louis.</i><br /><br />The film is named after Lindbergh's plane, and the story begins on the night before his journey begins. Even as "Slim" is tossing and turning, trying to catch some sleep before he begins what could be a 40-hour flight, he starts remembering what led him to this point. We see, in these flashbacks, and others that take place during the flight, how Lindbergh first bought his first plane, how he handled his job as a mail aviator in terrible weather conditions, how he convinced a group of St. Louis businessman to back his transatlantic attempt, and how the <i>Spirit of St. Louis </i>was designed and built.<br /><br />Some of these recollections are told to a stowaway – a fly who comes along for the first part of the flight. It's a charming device, which our kids really enjoyed - Lindbergh points out to the fly where they are on the map and how long they've been flying. I was even a little disappointed when the fly decides he'd prefer to stay on this side of the Atlantic, and takes his leave out the open cockpit window.<br /><br />For some kids and adults, used to more frenetic action, the pacing might strike them as a bit slow. The film is also long, at more than two hours, and I suspect it might have lost our kids' attention if we hadn't watched it in two separate chunks. But broken up that way, it kept the attention of our whole family from 4 to 46.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />The topic matter of the film raises a few issues that could be worth talking about with the kids. The first is hero-worship. Lindbergh had drive, skill, and charisma – we can't help but root for him. But what the film doesn't get into is his failings – he had several affairs. Of course, our kids don't need to know all about that, but it is good to remember that our heroes have feet of clay, so we should not put them on a pedestal.<br /><br />Another topic worth a discussion is, what sort of risk is appropriate? Lindbergh was probably not a Christian and likely an agnostic, so he wasn't assessing risk from a Christian perspective. But we can. And in light of the other pilots who had died earlier trying this same flight, was it a good and worthy thing for Lindbergh to attempt? Or was he treating carelessly the life that God had entrusted to his stewardship? Questions worth discussing.<br /><br />Finally, Lindbergh's religious views do come up, briefly in the film. Lindbergh was a private man, so his religious views seem hard to nail down, but he wasn't an orthodox Christian. However it's said he flew combat missions in World War II with a New Testament, and later spoke of the importance of Jesus' ethics. In the film his muddled thinking about God comes up in a few brief scenes. First, Lindbergh notes that when he flies he doesn't ask God for help. A Roman Catholic priest tries to set him right, and later on a friend superstitiously sneaks a St. Christopher's Medal on the flight for good luck (the medal is thought, by Catholics, to ask the saint to bless a traveler's journey). Finally, as he is at the end of his flight, sleep deprived and unsure he can land it, he tries to recall one of the priest's prayers, and ends up simply crying out to God for help. This confusion about God might be surprising to very young viewers, and worth a discussion.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />The 49-years-old Jimmy Stewart was playing a man 24 years his junior, and if Lindbergh seems a little older than 25, Stewart still pulls it off. This is an interesting bit of history, charmingly acted. Another good one for the whole family.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fPlOatUAUco" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-61938833520032085222018-07-04T13:52:00.000-07:002018-07-27T01:08:07.554-07:00The absent-minded professor<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HByYdxCiYp0/Wz0u_y8KbQI/AAAAAAAACx8/025G7QjK6n8iukTwoqjH1kxQgYPmaRjzQCLcBGAs/s1600/Absent.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="801" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HByYdxCiYp0/Wz0u_y8KbQI/AAAAAAAACx8/025G7QjK6n8iukTwoqjH1kxQgYPmaRjzQCLcBGAs/s320/Absent.jpg" width="223" /></a>Black and White / Family<br />1961 / 96 minutes<br />RATING: 7/10<br /><br />The classic begins with a bang – a lab accident blows up Ned Brainard's garage and leaves the professor knocked out cold.<br /><br />The good news? This explosive experiment has produced a wondrous new substance - a rubbery material that when rolled up in a ball and dropped&nbsp;<i>gains height with each bounce. </i>It's almost like this <i>rubber</i> can <i>fly</i>&nbsp;so, of course, the professor names it <i>flubber</i>. And what's the first thing he does with flubber? Why, use it to create the world's first flying Model T of course!<br /><br />The bad news? While he was out cold the professor missed his wedding...for the third time!<br /><br />Betsy Carlisle is his long-suffering fiancee. While she loves her Neddy, this is <i>it</i> – she doesn't want to hear any more excuses. "I say, three strikes and you're out!" To make the situation that much more difficult for Ned, he has a rival for Betsy's attention. Professor Shelby Ashton is egotistical and even more self-absorbed than Ned but he has one thing going for him – he knows how to shows up on time.<br /><br />To get Betsy's attention Ned puts his flubber to use and this is where the fun really begins. When the college's basketball team is losing badly, Ned secretly irons flubber on to all of the players' shoes. When the second half starts the Medfield team is now able to jump, not just over the other team, but right over the gym rafters!<br /><br />While this stunt doesn't impress Betsy, Ned and his flying Model T do catch the attention of all three branches of the US military and a particularly unscrupulous businessman. Car chases and hijinks soon follow.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />As children do sometimes do as they see, the biggest concern might be language. One of the villains – businessman Alonzo Hawk – calls people "idiots," "stupid," or "tells them to shut-up."<br /><br />There is some violence – a shoot-out in which no one gets hit, and two thugs unsuccessfully trying to get Professor Brainard – but this is of the comic sort and even our six-year-old knew everything was going to be okay (but our four-year-old had to be reassured).<br /><br />Oh, and at one point Hawk gambles on a basketball game.<br /><br />It may be worth pointing out to younger viewers that the "hero" of this story, Professor Brainard, is not a good example at the beginning – he's prioritized science over his bride-to-be! Thankfully, by film's end he's learned the error of his ways.<br /><div><br /></div><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />This classic spawned a sequel and two remakes but they never improved on the original. A flying car, a villain who can leap buildings in a single bound, a damsel who's in distress because her bumbling knight has left her at the altar <i>again </i>– this is fun that everyone will enjoy.<br /><br /><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QrwqIEIQuoY" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-82885616946634152072018-06-28T17:07:00.000-07:002018-09-18T12:59:32.943-07:00Sgt. Stubby: an unlikely hero<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>Animated / Family<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-t2ie9wbkGaQ/WzZJ4L6NMGI/AAAAAAAACxY/YikmCyT10lYZBB9_z42MQqgKww5vuGzhQCLcBGAs/s1600/Sgt.-Stubby2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="804" data-original-width="560" height="320" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-t2ie9wbkGaQ/WzZJ4L6NMGI/AAAAAAAACxY/YikmCyT10lYZBB9_z42MQqgKww5vuGzhQCLcBGAs/s320/Sgt.-Stubby2.jpg" width="222" /></a></div>2018 / 84 minutes<br />Rating: 8/10<br /><br />I read a review by a parent who arrived at the movie theater with his four-year-old and picked this film based solely on the smiling ever-so-cute doggie he saw on the movie poster. One problem: while this is about a charming, incredibly clever dog named Stubby, it's also about life in the trenches of World War I. And that's not 4-year-old material. Why oh why don't more people read movie reviews!<br /><br />But, as we mark the 100th anniversary of the end of the "Great War" this is a movie that many a ten-year-old and up will enjoy and should watch.<br /><br />It's based on the true story of Sgt. Stubby, the most decorated dog in American history. The story begins with the homeless dog attaching himself to a unit readying itself to be shipped overseas. First he charms his way into the heart of one Private Robert Conroy, the main two-legged character in the film. Then, one by one, from the lowest private to the general in charge, he wins over everyone. Well, not everyone. Some folks just aren't dog people, and Private Elmer Olsen just doesn't understand what's so special about Stubby.<br /><br />When the unit heads overseas, Stubby manages to sneak aboard the ship, and he too is heading to the fight.<br /><br />From this point onward there's one perilous scene after another, but to make it appropriate for (nearly) the whole family, the filmmakers decided to make this an entirely bloodless film. Even as bullets are whizzing, no one gets shot. German bombardments send both soldiers and dirt flying, but the soldiers get dug out and emerge both unbruised and unbloodied.<br /><br />While parents will appreciated the nonexistent blood and gore, by muting the violence and death the film ran the risk of also muting the sacrifice that these soldiers made. But as the film draws to a close there is one death - to a secondary character - that drives home, even to the younger audiences, what these men risked and what they lost. Without giving it all away, I'll note that the death happens off screen and we don't even see the body. It is the soldier's absence that is noted – while his friends are looking for him after the last big battle, Stubby brings them his helmet. That'll get some kids crying, and even moisten the eye of many an adult. But it is necessary. And it is done with great care and restraint.<br /><br />As you'd expect with an energetic pooch as its star, there is a lot of fun in the film. Kids are sure to enjoy Stubby training along with his fellow soldiers, getting chased by the cook, and winning over the Colonel after Conroy teaches his little buddy how to salute. In another treat, Gérard Depardieu makes an appearance as a large, wise French soldier, who along with Conroy and Stubby is tasked to spy out German positions. These "three musketeers" become fast friends, saving each others' lives.<br /><br /><b>Cautions</b><br /><br />There are only a couple of concerns, including a little bit of language. The worst of it includes one character saying "What the devil?" and another exclaiming "I'll be darned."<br /><br />There is also just one bit of "naughty" comedy as the drill sergeant lectures his men on they should imitate the never-complaining, always-ready-to-roll Stubby but he makes this speech just as Stubby decides to lick his nether regions. That gets a laugh out of the sergeant and his men as they are presented with proof-positive that Stubby has some traits that aren't worthy of imitation.<br /><br />The big caution would concern the near constant peril. This is <i>not </i>a film for four-year-olds. But most ten-year-olds will be sure to enjoy it.<br /><br /><b>Conclusion</b><br /><br />This was such a pleasure to discover. Before this I couldn't have imagined a war film that would be appropriate for the very young and yet still be a treat for their parents. This would be a great one to watch with the family for Remembrance Day, Memorial Day, or Anzac Day.<br /><br />It will be available come November, 2018 on DVD.<br /><br />Oh, and if you want to know all the details about the real Stubby, our family really enjoyed listening to the audio version of Ann Bausum's <i>Stubby the war dog.</i><br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/k13H9PM7Twg" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-58417985208460176862018-05-31T00:23:00.001-07:002018-05-31T00:23:29.354-07:00Beyond is Genesis history?Documentary<br />2017 / 400 minutes<br />RATING: 7/10<br /><br />In Del Tackett’s 2017 documentary <i>Is Genesis History? </i>he interviewed PhD-holding scientists with various areas of expertise, all of them happy to share why their field of study backed a literal understanding of the first few chapters of Genesis. <br /><br />It was among the best creationist documentaries ever made, and it left viewers wanting more. We wanted more with geologists Steve Austin and Andrew Snelling, and more with paleontologist Kurt Wise, and more with the many other experts consulted.<br /><br />So that’s what Tackett’s given us. In <i>Beyond Is Genesis History? </i>Tackett shares 20 interviews – all of them 18 to 21 minutes – with six of the experts he consulted for the feature documentary. I <i>loved </i>the documentary, but I thought, at 400 minutes, this follow-up was too much of a good thing, and I gave it a pass. But then my dad saw it, loved it, bought me a copy and told me I really needed to see this. And boy was he right!<br /><br />This isn’t something you’ll watch straight through – anything more than an interview or two at a time is going to be intellectual overload – but it is spectacular! Much more than talking heads, this is heartfelt, concise, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">deep</i> discussion! Anyone who enjoyed <i>Is Genesis History? </i>will be sure to love this too. <br /><br />Check out the trailer below, and for a dozen clips from the documentary, click <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEVsU6O-XMpGHKna3DpTkYPkn5kZ0MVy5" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_Mj9bR9BiqI" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-29413285633400993942018-05-26T01:31:00.002-07:002018-05-26T01:35:44.469-07:00School shootings: the cause and the cure<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-n2-j-TwaY04/Wwkadr3kHyI/AAAAAAAACvI/bD80TvS4KJglh7ocXWhjCJx5pFNCynK4wCLcBGAs/s1600/School-shootings.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="373" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-n2-j-TwaY04/Wwkadr3kHyI/AAAAAAAACvI/bD80TvS4KJglh7ocXWhjCJx5pFNCynK4wCLcBGAs/s320/School-shootings.jpg" width="213" /></a>Documentary <br />2018 / 20 minutes <br /><b>RATING 7/10<br /></b><br />Ray Comfort’s new 20-minute movie is worth watching for the first few minutes alone. Comfort interviews young people and asks them if they can call a school shooter evil…and they can’t! Our culture doesn’t want to condemn evil because then they would have to own up to the evil in their own hearts.<br /><br />Comfort understands that, so we get to watch as he coaches and encourages these young people to own up to what they already know – that this was wicked, that sin is real, and that they themselves are sinners too.<br /><br />When they own up to that, then, and only then, does Comfort tell them about the Jesus. As he puts it in one of his books, there is a need to first bring people to “Moses” – to God’s Law and to a realization we are sinners – before bringing them to Jesus, who saves us from sins.<br /><br /><b>Cautions</b><br />The only caution I’d offer is that at one point Comfort makes it sound as if the reason we should turn to God is to reduce school shootings. But, of course, we don’t worship God for the purpose of combatting school violence; we worship God because He is good, just, gracious, and our both our Creator and Redeemer, deserving of all praise. <br /><br /><b>Conclusion</b><br />Like every Ray Comfort film, this has an evangelistic intent, that becomes explicit about halfway through. Most Christians could benefit from seeing Comfort in action, confronting and encouraging a world that doesn’t believe sin exists, to own up to the fact that they themselves are sinners. <br /><br />Watch it for free at <a href="https://www.livingwaters.com/school-shooting-movie">livingwaters.com/school-shooting-movie</a> or below.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5G5KW8AtLjY" style="text-indent: 0.5in;" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-68125760534887363422018-05-25T16:15:00.001-07:002018-05-25T16:20:04.578-07:00CalvinistDocumentary<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8h09BX47yqA/WwiQRaO1aZI/AAAAAAAACuw/al0lPsMORdgcZJYOiNMBjoPuY4LBwL9eQCLcBGAs/s1600/Calvinist.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="395" height="320" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8h09BX47yqA/WwiQRaO1aZI/AAAAAAAACuw/al0lPsMORdgcZJYOiNMBjoPuY4LBwL9eQCLcBGAs/s320/Calvinist.jpg" width="225" /></a></div>89 minutes / 2017<br /><b>RATING: 8/10</b><br /><br /><i>Calvinist</i> is the story of a generation of young men and women who went searching for answers and found them in Reformed theology.<br /><br />I found this a fascinating film because what they discovered is what I've always had as my birthright. I grew up in a Reformed home, attended a Reformed church, and went to a Reformed school, and it was the same for most of my friends and family. What was so very fun about&nbsp;<i>Calvinist </i>was the opportunity to see through new eyes, the knowledge of God that I had taken too much for granted.<br /><br />The "young, restless, and Reformed" were a product of the late 90s and early 2000s – they had questions, and the Internet gave them access to all sorts of answers. When they googled "How do I know if I'm saved?" or "How do I know the Bible is true?" the best answers they found were by Reformed theologians like R.C. Sproul, John Piper, John MacArther, and more.<br /><br />So this documentary serves at least three purposes:<br /><ol><li>It is a history of how God steered this questioning generation towards just what they needed to know Him.&nbsp;</li><li><i>Calvinist&nbsp;</i>also shares many of the answers these seekers were after. Producer Les Lanphere went to today's biggest name Reformers and and hit them with some of the biggest questions. So, in addition to learning some recent history, the audience learns timeless biblical truths.&nbsp;</li><li>The film also introduces us to a host of solidly Reformed teachers. In addition to Sproul, Piper and MacArther, Lanphere talks to:</li></ol><ul><ul><li>Michael Horton</li><li>Tim Challies</li><li>Robert Godfrey</li><li>Joel Beeke</li><li>Paul Washer</li><li>James White</li><li>Carl Trueman</li><li>Jeff Durbin</li><li>...and many more</li></ul></ul>That's an impressive, long list; Lanphere has put in the time and effort needed to make this a very special film.<br /><br />That extra effort also comes out in all the slick transitions and special effects – this looks <i>good</i>! One fun bit is running gag of sorts. Lanphere used 80s-era computer game style graphics to animate and illustrate some points. So, for example, when discussing Roman Catholicism's "faith plus works" position, we see what looks like an old arcade game, and scroll through some possible "fighters" until the selection stops on Martin Luther.<br /><br />An interesting tangent that's briefly explored is the impact Reformed Rap had on these young seekers. I watched this with a group of 20-somethings who had never heard of Timothy Brindle and Shai Linne and they were amused and maybe even a little shocked that "Rap" could be paired up with "Reformed." But is it really so surprising that a medium which gives primacy to the word would be a great one for communicating the deepest truths about God?<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />While all the Reformed teachers we're introduced to are quite conservative, they do have some differences among them that aren't ever discussed. The most notable concerns baptism – there's a roughly 50/50 divide among the speakers, with half believing in credo-baptism (Piper, MacArthur, Durbin, White, Challies) and the other half, infant-baptism (Sproul, Horton, Trueman, Beeke, Godfrey).<br /><br />Other differences also exist, so while a discerning student can learn much from these men, discernment is indeed needed.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />I've shared this film with two different sets of friends and everyone has really enjoyed it. This will be a hit with anyone 18 and up who has an interest in Reformed Theology. It probably won't convince a non-Reformed friend, but it will probably give the two of you a lot to talk about and explore further.<br /><br />If you use it for a group movie night, consider having an ice cream and brownie break at maybe the one hour mark. There's just so much packed in here, that a break is needed to allow folks to think through and discuss what they've been seeing and hearing.<br /><br />You can check out the trailer below, and further down you can see two YouTube videos that are featured prominently in the film because of the impact they had on the young, restless and Reformed generation.<br /><br />You can buy <i>Calvinist</i> <a href="http://leslanphere.com/" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/axjzInqdzBI" width="560"></iframe> <br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bLgIecL1IdY" width="560"></iframe> <br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PH0mnIO9K7I" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-84899413866519499312018-04-18T04:23:00.000-07:002018-07-27T02:37:10.411-07:00150 movies King David might watch<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-SvYRul5OGqI/WtdyT7L6EHI/AAAAAAAACqQ/oqb6dsmrsIE_0XJtLCopt-WjoqEPpLACQCLcBGAs/s1600/movies.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="700" data-original-width="1280" height="218" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-SvYRul5OGqI/WtdyT7L6EHI/AAAAAAAACqQ/oqb6dsmrsIE_0XJtLCopt-WjoqEPpLACQCLcBGAs/s400/movies.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br />Great mind think alike, and this month those two great minds were a missionary in Brazil and an evangelist in California.<br /><br />The evangelist, Ray Comfort, passed along a story, first told by Jeremy Archer, about a man who invited all sort of folks into his house to meet his family. Often the visitors would talk crudely and angrily with each other, teaching his children words he'd rather they not know. But they could also get his whole family laughing so the man decided to focus on the good they did, rather than the bad.<br /><br />Over time the man could see the visitors were having an impact on his family, and it wasn't a good one. He found that his own children were now using crude language and making coarse jokes. What was worse, the visitors were behaving outrageously, even taking their clothes off right there in front of his family!<br /><br />That's hard to believe, isn't it? Why didn't the man just kick them out? Why didn't he protect his family from their influence? Well, it turns out this man had some sense, and as the visitors started getting naked the man acted. Together, with his family, the man finally "turned off the television."<br /><br />That same month, and it might have been the same week, the missionary, Rev. Ken Wieske expressed the same concern another way, titling a Facebook post "David vows to get rid of his TV." Underneath he included the text of Psalm 101 which reads (in part):<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">I will ponder the way that is blameless.<br />Oh when will you come to me?<br />I will walk with integrity of heart<br />within my house;<br />I will not set before my eyes<br />anything that is worthless.</blockquote>The pastor's point was clear: most of what's on TV is worthless and if King David were here on earth today, he might well pitch his TV right out of the palace. Of course, it isn't quite as easy as that. Today we also have computers, and smartphones, so getting rid of the TV isn't going to restrict out access to fluff and filth that's so readily available.<br /><br />So let's take this a step further. Yes, much of what's on TV (and on YouTube, Facebook, etc.) is pretty much worthless. But some of it isn't. Some of it is quite good. Excellent even! So if we were to make the same promise King David makes in Psalm 101, to put away all that is worthless, what sorts of film and videos might he still watch?<br /><br />I've got some suggestions, and I've listed them under 10 categories, with 15 movie recommendations in each category. My hope is that this list can help families find something worthwhile to watch. With over 150 suggestions I'm also hoping there will be something for everyone.<br /><br />Title, year, and length, are included, and, if there's a review available on ReformedPerspective.ca, or my movie review blog, ReelConservative.com, then I've indicated that by making the title all caps and clickable.<br /><br />I've also included an entertainment rating. This is out of 10, and in my books a 7 is a solid mark, while 8 is something special, and 6 is still watchable, but that indicates there is some notable flaw (maybe corny writing, or a bad bit of acting, that sort of thing). The only reason I've included a few films that rate as low as 6 is because they have educational value.<br /><br />One other note: none of these take God's name in vain. That's important. While a degree of violence and even sexual content of some sort (kissing, hugging) can be appropriate on screen, the way God's name is abused on film never is.<br /><br /><b>ANIMATED VIDEOS</b><br /><i>This mix of shorter videos (the longer ones are made up of several parts) can be ideal when mom wants to take a nap, but doesn't want the kids sitting in front of the TV forever</i><br /><b><br /></b>Anne of Green Gables, Vol. 1-3 – 2003, 150 minutes – 7/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-N98fK66S-RE/WtdzT4n6NuI/AAAAAAAACrU/nQzJMGOVPyQM8DeTfwn2gcavsBTw1CCxQCEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bgables.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="285" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-N98fK66S-RE/WtdzT4n6NuI/AAAAAAAACrU/nQzJMGOVPyQM8DeTfwn2gcavsBTw1CCxQCEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bgables.jpg" width="140" /></a></div>Adventures in Odyssey: The Knight Travelers – 1991, 27 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2017/09/the-gruffalo.html" target="_blank">THE GRUFFALO</a>&nbsp; – 2009, 27 minutes – 8/10<br />Horton Hears a Who – 1970, 30 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/08/jungle-beat-fun-for-kids-that-will-have.html" target="_blank">JUNGLE BEAT</a>&nbsp;– 65 minutes – 10/10<br />Larry-Boy and the Fib from Outer Space – 1999, 30 minutes – 7/10<br />Lord of the Beans – 2005, 52 minutes – 7/10<br />Peppa Pig: The Balloon Ride – 2014, 60 minutes – 7/10<br />The Pond<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/02/theres-something-funny-in-water.html" target="_blank">THERE'S SOMETHING FUNNY IN THE WATER</a>&nbsp;– 2005, 27 minutes – 8/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– The Little Things – 30 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– The Rise and Fall of Tony the Frog – 30 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– Alligator Hunter – 30 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– Big Mouth Bass – 32 minutes – 7/10<br />Wallace and Gromit in Three Amazing Adventures – 1989-1995, 85 minutes –&nbsp; 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/12/the-way-things-work.html" target="_blank">THE WAY THINGS WORK</a>&nbsp;– 2001, 300+ minutes – 8/10<br /><br /><b>ANIMATED FILMS</b><br /><i>Looking for something good for a family "dinner and a movie" night?</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/01/the-boxcar-children.html" target="_blank">THE BOXCAR CHILDREN</a>&nbsp;– 2013, 81 minutes – 7/10<br />Chicken Run – 2000, 84 minutes – 8/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>Curious George – 2006, 88 minutes – 8/10<br />Curious George 3: Back to the Jungle – 2015, 81 minutes – 7/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EW6ySCI3cxs/WtdzTXUabKI/AAAAAAAACrk/0gvGkdyu3rMsvFEseLkuo9is4s0ox5CrQCEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bfox.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="281" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EW6ySCI3cxs/WtdzTXUabKI/AAAAAAAACrk/0gvGkdyu3rMsvFEseLkuo9is4s0ox5CrQCEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bfox.jpg" width="142" /></a></div>Finding Nemo – 2003, 100 minutes – 8/10<br />Fox and the Hound – 1981, 83 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/02/lost-and-found.html" target="_blank">LOST AND FOUND</a>&nbsp;– 2013, 24 minutes – 8/10<br />The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh – 1977, 74 minutes – 8/10<br />Meet the Robinsons – 2007, 95 minutes – 7/10<br />Monsters Inc. – 2001, 93 minutes – 9/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/08/the-peanuts-movie.html" target="_blank">THE PEANUTS MOVIE</a>&nbsp;– 2015, 88 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/06/sgt-stubby-unlikely-hero.html" target="_blank">SGT. STUBBY</a> – 2018, 84 minutes – 8/10<br />Tangled – 2010, 100 minutes – 9/10<br />Up – 2009, 96 minutes – 9/10<br />Wall-E – 2008, 98 minutes – 9/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/01/winnie-pooh.html" target="_blank">WINNIE THE POOH</a>&nbsp;– 2011, 63 miinutes – 8/10<br /><br /><b>BASED ON A BOOK</b><br /><i>It's always hard to live up to the book, but some of these get awfully close!</i><br /><br />The Adventures of Robin Hood - 1938, 101 minutes – 8/10<br />The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes – 1939, 82 minutes – 7/10<br />Animal Farm – 1954, 72 minutes – 7/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IAaKS5zKJow/WtdzS2vzcFI/AAAAAAAACqc/Vjwm7TZ1JFAOi7Y0ZmxFUiRTkatvS0JZgCEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Banimal.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IAaKS5zKJow/WtdzS2vzcFI/AAAAAAAACqc/Vjwm7TZ1JFAOi7Y0ZmxFUiRTkatvS0JZgCEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Banimal.jpg" width="141" /></a></div><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/04/the-giver.html" target="_blank">THE GIVER</a>&nbsp;– 2014, 97 minutes – 8/10<br />Ivanhoe – 1952, 107 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/01/the-lord-of-rings-animated-trilogy.html" target="_blank">THE HOBBIT</a>&nbsp;– 1977, 77 minutes – 7/10<br />The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe – 1979, 95 minutes – 7/10<br />Little Women – 1949, 121 minutes – 8/10<br />Little Women – 1994, 118 minutes – 9/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/01/the-lord-of-rings-animated-trilogy.html" target="_blank">THE LORD OF THE RINGS</a>&nbsp;– 1978, 133 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/01/pollyanna.html" target="_blank">POLLYANNA</a>&nbsp;– 2003, 99 minutes – 8/10<br />The Prince and the Pauper – 1937, 118 minutes – 8/10<br />Pride and Prejudice – 2004, 104 minutes – 8/10<br />Sarah Plain and Tall – 1990, 98 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/10/swiss-family-robinson.html" target="_blank">SWISS FAMILY ROBINSON</a>&nbsp;– 1960, 126 minutes – 8/10<br /><b><br /></b><b>BLACK AND WHITE CLASSICS</b><br /><i>These have all stood the test of time and are still being watched again and again.</i><br /><br />12 Angry Men – 1957, 96 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/the-absent-minded-professor.html" target="_blank">THE ABSENT-MINDED PROFESSOR</a> – 1961, 96 minutes – 7/10<br />Adam's Rib – 1949, 101 minutes –&nbsp; 8/10<br /><div><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2010/05/casablanca-drama-103-min-1943-why-not.html" target="_blank">CASABLANCA</a>&nbsp;– 1943, 103 minutes – 10/10&nbsp;</div>Citizen Kane – 1941, 119 minutes – 7/10<br />High Noon – 1952, 85 minutes – 9/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PEwp5NnF5vw/WtdzVg0Rq2I/AAAAAAAACq8/hXRyVsIZtWoybh1VGktUFQWCjZU8wfclACEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bnoon.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="300" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PEwp5NnF5vw/WtdzVg0Rq2I/AAAAAAAACq8/hXRyVsIZtWoybh1VGktUFQWCjZU8wfclACEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bnoon.jpg" width="133" /></a></div>I Remember Mama – 1948, 134 minutes – 7/10<br />It Should Happen to You – 1954, 87 minutes – 7/10<br /><div>The Man in the White Suit – 1951, 85 minutes – 7/10</div><div><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/the-man-who-shot-liberty-valance.html" target="_blank">THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE</a> – 1962, 123 minutes – 8/10</div><div>Meet John Doe – 1941, 122 minutes – 7/10</div><div>Mr. Deed goes to Town – 1936, 115 minutes – 7/10</div><div>Mr. Smith Goes to Washington – 1939, 129 minutes – 8/10</div><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/the-sea-hawk.html" target="_blank">THE SEA HAWK</a> – 1940, 127 minutes – 8/10<br />The Shop Around the Corner – 1949, 99 minutes – 9/10<br /><br /><b>BIOGRAPHICAL</b><br /><i>Some of these are great, others only okay, but all are education.</i><br /><br />Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace – 1999, 90 minutes – 7/10<br />The Case for Christ – 2017, 113 minutes – 7/10<br />End of the Spear – 2006, 108 minutes – 7/10<br />Final Solution – 2001, 102 minutes – 7/10<br />God's Outlaw: The Story of William Tyndale – 1988, 93 minutes – 6/10<br />Hellen Keller – 2005, 30 minutes – 6/10<br />John Hus – 1985, 55 minutes – 5/10<br />Martin Luther – 1953, 105 minutes – 7/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-maDM_rvgUTg/WtdzWqAlWiI/AAAAAAAACrg/vl0sNjXP2LcuwQvr2bDa66yjWnQ13Yh5gCEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bspear.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-maDM_rvgUTg/WtdzWqAlWiI/AAAAAAAACrg/vl0sNjXP2LcuwQvr2bDa66yjWnQ13Yh5gCEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bspear.jpg" width="141" /></a></div>The Miracle Worker – 1962, 106 minutes – 9/10<br /><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/the-spirit-of-st-louis.html" target="_blank">THE SPIRIT OF ST. LOUIS</a> – 1957, 135 minutes – 7/10<br />Torchlighters:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2014/03/the-corrie-ten-boom-story.html" target="_blank">THE CORRIE TEN BOOM STORY</a>&nbsp;– 2013, 34 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/08/christian-biographies-for-children-3.html" target="_blank">THE JIM ELLIOT STORY</a>&nbsp;– 2005, 30 minutes – 6/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2017/10/torchlighters-martin-luther-story.html" target="_blank">THE MARTIN LUTHER STORY</a>&nbsp;– 2106, 34 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/08/christian-biographies-for-children-3.html" target="_blank">THE RICHARD WUMBRAND STORY</a>&nbsp;– 2008, 30 minutes – 6/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/08/christian-biographies-for-children-3.html" target="_blank">THE WILLIAM TYNDALE STORY</a>&nbsp;– 2005, 32 minutes – 6/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/04/the-wright-brothers-animated-hero.html" target="_blank">THE WRIGHT BROTHERS</a>&nbsp;– 1996, 27 minutes – 7/10<br /><br /><b>CHILDREN</b><br /><i>This is fare for younger children – not a lot of tension here. And that means, while the kids will probably like it, mom and dad might not.</i><br /><b><br /></b>The Adventures of Milo and Otis – 1989, 76 minutes – 7/10<br />Buddy Davis' Amazing Adventures:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/11/more-buddy-davis-amazing-adventures.html" target="_blank">ALASKA</a>&nbsp;– 2015, 25 minutes – 6/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/05/buddy-davis-amazing-adventures-extreme.html" target="_blank">EXTREME CAVING</a>&nbsp;– 2013, 58 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/12/free-video-buddy-davis-amazing.html" target="_blank">I DIG DINOSAURS</a>&nbsp;– 2011 – 26 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;–&nbsp;<a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/11/more-buddy-davis-amazing-adventures.html" target="_blank">SWAMP MAN</a>&nbsp;– 2012, 45 minutes – 7/10<br />Tintin: Destination Moon – 1992, 83 minutes – 7/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n-M_SWl6pHk/WtdzVImASfI/AAAAAAAACrg/qQ5NExEgIVQdtBbVdZMcp3R-2p4J5TGlACEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bmoon.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n-M_SWl6pHk/WtdzVImASfI/AAAAAAAACrg/qQ5NExEgIVQdtBbVdZMcp3R-2p4J5TGlACEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bmoon.jpg" width="141" /></a></div><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/02/incredible-creatures-that-defy.html" target="_blank">INCREDIBLE CREATURES THAT DEFY EVOLUTION I</a> – 2006, 47 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/06/a-jurassic-ark-mystery.html" target="_blank">A JURASSIC ARK MYSTERY</a>&nbsp;– 2001, 45 minutes – 7/10<br /><div>Lassie Come Home – 1943, 90 minutes – 8/10</div><div><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/01/a-lego-brickumentary.html" target="_blank">A LEGO BRICKUMENTARY</a> – 2015, 93 minutes – 7/10</div><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/03/misty.html" target="_blank">MISTY</a>&nbsp;– 1961, 91 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2017/09/the-newtons-workshop.html" target="_blank">THE NEWTONS' WORKSHOP</a>&nbsp;– 1997, 226 minutes – 7/10<br />The Runner from Ravenshead - 2010, 81 minutes – 7/10<br />The Wild Brothers<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– <a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/11/the-wild-brothers-welcome-to-our-world.html" target="_blank">WELCOME TO OUR WORLD</a> – 2015, 28 minutes – 7/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– <a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/03/the-wild-brothers-paradise-lost.html" target="_blank">PARADISE LOST</a>&nbsp;– 2015, 28 minutes – 7/10<br /><br /><b>ON CREATION, EVOLUTION AND DESIGN</b><br /><br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/04/alien-intrusion-unmasking-deception.html" target="_blank">ALIEN INTRUSION</a> – 2018, 109 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2011/03/darwin-voyage-that-shook-world.html" target="_blank">DARWIN: THE VOYAGE THAT SHOOK THE WORLD</a> – 2009, 55 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2014/11/evolutions-achilles-heels.html" target="_blank">EVOLUTION'S ACHILLES' HEELS</a> – 2014, 96 minutes – 9/10<br />Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed – 2008, 95 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/09/flight-genius-of-birds.html" target="_blank">FLIGHT: THE GENIUS OF BIRDS</a> – 2013, 63 minutes – 9/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/03/genesis-paradise-lost-part-1.html" target="_blank">GENESIS: PARADISE LOST</a> – 2018, 109 minutes – 8/10<br />Icons of Evolution – 2002, 52 minutes - 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/03/incredible-creatures-that-define-design.html" target="_blank">INCREDIBLE CREATURES THAT DEFINE DESIGN</a> – 2011, 62 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://reformedperspective.ca/movie-review-is-genesis-history/" target="_blank">IS GENESIS HISTORY?</a> – 2017, 100 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/08/living-waters.html" target="_blank">LIVING WATERS</a>&nbsp;– 2015, 69 minutes – 8/10<br />Metamorphosis: The Beauty and Design of Butterflies – 2011, 64 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2014/05/mount-st-helens-modern-day-evidence-for.html" target="_blank">MOUNT ST. HELENS: MODERN EVIDENCE FOR A WORLD WIDE FLOOD</a> – 2012, 36 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2011/06/noahs-ark-thinking-outside-box.html" target="_blank">NOAH'S ARK: THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX</a> – 2008, 35 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/01/the-privileged-planet.html" target="_blank">THE PRIVILEGED PLANET</a> – 2005, 60 minutes – 8/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XbSbWeqa7l0/Wte1XCUjCiI/AAAAAAAACsE/6v9covMZ1jMXPi3vgHivmz9-QoOSdSThQCLcBGAs/s1600/1%2Bplanet.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="281" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XbSbWeqa7l0/Wte1XCUjCiI/AAAAAAAACsE/6v9covMZ1jMXPi3vgHivmz9-QoOSdSThQCLcBGAs/s200/1%2Bplanet.jpg" width="142" /></a></div><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/12/revolutionary-michael-behe-and-mystery.html" target="_blank">REVOLUTIONARY</a> – 2016, 60 minutes – 7/10<br /><br /><b>DOCUMENTARIES</b><br /><i>The very best documentaries pack books worth of knowledge into a short hour or two. And these are just that sort.</i><br /><br />Collision: Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson – 2009, 93 minutes – 9/10<br />Cool It: Are We Saving the World or Just Burning Money? – 2010, 88 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2011/05/demographic-winter.html" target="_blank">DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER</a> – 2008, 56 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/10/the-free-speech-apocalypse.html" target="_blank">THE FREE SPEECH APOCALYPSE</a> – 2015, 89 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/07/how-to-answer-fool.html" target="_blank">HOW TO ANSWER A FOOL</a> – 2013, 85 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/09/jericho-unearthed.html" target="_blank">EXPEDITION BIBLE: JERICHO UNEARTHED</a> – 2010, 34 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/04/indoctrination.html" target="_blank">INDOCTRINATION</a> – 2011, 102 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/12/logic-on-fire.html" target="_blank">LOGIC ON FIRE</a> – 2015, 102 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/10/the-narnia-code.html" target="_blank">THE NARNIA CODE</a> – 2009, 59 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2011/12/notes-from-tilt-whirl.html" target="_blank">NOTES FROM THE TILT-A-WHIRL</a> – 2011, 51 minutes – 10/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/01/reckoning.html" target="_blank">THE RECKONING</a> – 2006, 96 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/05/rescued-heart-of-adoption-and-caring.html" target="_blank">RESCUED: THE HEART OF ADOPTION</a> – 2012, 62 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/03/unplanned.html" target="_blank">UNPLANNED</a> – 2011, 62 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/04/waiting-for-superman.html" target="_blank">WAITING FOR SUPERMAN</a> – 2010, 111 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2014/12/wait-till-its-free.html" target="_blank">WAIT TILL IT'S FREE</a> – 2014, 82 minutes – 9/10<br /><br /><b>FAMILY FUN</b><br /><i>These are films that mom and dad can enjoy too, but that does mean that some of them have action or drama that may be too intense for younger children. So be sure to research age-appropriateness.</i><br /><br /><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/the-absent-minded-professor.html" target="_blank">THE ABSENT-MINDED PROFESSOR</a> - 1961, 96 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/12/beyond-mask.html" target="_blank">BEYOND THE MASK</a> – 2015, 103 minutes – 8/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HSI3-qm6k34/WtdzVNkvdAI/AAAAAAAACro/3BPwekWUvk4rLNlDQECaZqI4D4q7Ath6wCEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bjester-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HSI3-qm6k34/WtdzVNkvdAI/AAAAAAAACro/3BPwekWUvk4rLNlDQECaZqI4D4q7Ath6wCEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bjester-1.jpg" width="141" /></a></div><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/born-free.html" target="_blank">BORN FREE</a> - 1966, 95 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/07/city-of-ember.html" target="_blank">CITY OF EMBER</a> – 2008, 95 minutes – 7/10&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/06/condorman.html" target="_blank">CONDORMAN</a> – 1981, 90 minutes – 7/10<br />The Court Jester – 1956, 101 minutes – 8/10<br />Greyfriars Bobby – 1961, 87 minutes – 9/10<br />Hangman's Curse – 2003, 106 minutes – 8/10<br />Hans Brinker or the Silver Skates – 1962, 90&nbsp; minutes – 7/10<br />Love's Long Journey – 2005, 88 minutes – 7/10<br />The Last Chance Detectives – 1994, 47 minutes – 7/10<br />Old Yeller – 1957, 84 minutes – 9/10<br />Seasons of the Heart – 2003, 99 minutes – 8/10<br />Shark Boy and Lava Girl 3D – 2005, 93 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2018/03/storm-luthers-forbidden-letter.html" target="_blank">STORM: LUTHER'S FORBIDDEN LETTER</a> – 2017, 105 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/10/the-three-investigators-in-secret-of.html" target="_blank">THE THREE INVESTIGATORS IN THE SECRET OF SKELETON ISLAND</a> – 2007, 91 minutes – 7/10<br />Time Changer – 2002, 99 minutes – 7/10<br /><br /><b>FOR MOM AND DAD</b><br /><i>Films to kick back with your better half...and sometimes the older kids too.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/07/alleged.html" target="_blank">ALLEGED</a> – 2011, 93 minutes – 8/10<br />Anastasia – 1956, 105 minutes – 7/10<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6_ivEBic2oA/WtdzSxSIBJI/AAAAAAAACrQ/mvxo5MNzX9YWV2kyiXSDi_pyHHjYYGeqQCEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bana.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="285" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6_ivEBic2oA/WtdzSxSIBJI/AAAAAAAACrQ/mvxo5MNzX9YWV2kyiXSDi_pyHHjYYGeqQCEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bana.jpg" width="140" /></a></div>The Caine Mutiny - 1954, 124 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/06/courageous.html" target="_blank">COURAGEOUS</a> – 2011, 129 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2016/02/the-hobbit-film-trilogy.html" target="_blank">THE HOBBIT TRILOGY</a><br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– An Unexpected Journey – 2012, 169 minutes – 8/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– The Desolation of Smaug – 2013, 161 minutes – 8/10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;– The Battle of the Five Armies – 144 minutes – 7/10<br />The Lord of the Rings Trilogy – 2001-2003 – 10/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/06/like-dandelion-dust.html" target="_blank">LIKE DANDELION DUST</a> – 2009, 104 minutes – 8/10<br />Rear Window – 1954, 112 minutes – 8/10<br />Roman Holiday – 1953, 118 minutes – 8/10<br />The Second Chance – 2006, 102 – 7/10<br />The Song – 2014, 116 minutes – 9/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2012/02/to-save-life.html" target="_blank">TO SAVE A LIFE</a>&nbsp;– 2010, 120 minutes – 8/10<br />The Ultimate Gift – 2006, 114 minutes – 7/10<br />A Vow to Cherish – 1999, 84 minutes - 7/10<br /><br /><b>BONUS #1 - 5 SUPER SILENT FILMS</b><br /><i>If you've never gotten into silent films, be sure to start with the comedies – there the overwrought acting just adds to the funny. And Buster Keaton is the best!</i><br /><br />The General – 1927, 80 minutes – 8/10<br />The Gold Rush – 1925, 96 minutes – 7/10<br />Seven Chances – 1925, 56 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2017/10/sherlock-jr.html" target="_blank">SHERLOCK JR.</a> – 1924, 44 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="https://www.reelconservative.com/2018/07/the-cameraman.html" target="_blank">THE CAMERAMAN</a> - 1928, 76 minutes – 7/10<br /><br /><b>BONUS #2 - 10 ON WORLD WAR II</b><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><b><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rszKf6EunWg/WtdzTPDJHkI/AAAAAAAACrc/yDepvN0YP0oNxQJQUbSAz5YfWOAtXZ6TACEwYBhgL/s1600/1%2Bburma.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="294" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rszKf6EunWg/WtdzTPDJHkI/AAAAAAAACrc/yDepvN0YP0oNxQJQUbSAz5YfWOAtXZ6TACEwYBhgL/s200/1%2Bburma.jpg" width="136" /></a></b></div><br /><i>The very best World War II films were made during the war...or shortly after.</i><br /><b><br /></b>Bataan – 1943, 114 minutes – 7/10<br />Decision Before Dawn – 1951, 119 minutes – 7/10<br />Destination Tokyo – 1944, 135 minutes – 8/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2014/04/foreign-correspondent.html" target="_blank">THE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT</a>&nbsp;– 1940, 120 minutes – 7/10<br />Objective Burma! – 1945, 142 minutes – 7/10<br />Sahara – 1943, 98 minutes – 7/10<br /><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2014/03/the-silver-fleet.html" target="_blank">THE SILVER FLEET</a>&nbsp;– 1943, 88 minutes – 7/10<br />They Were Expendable – 1945, 135 minutes – 7/10<br /><div>To Be Or Not To Be – 1942, 99 minutes – 8/10</div><div>Twelve O'clock High – 1949 – 8/10</div>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-69354212132369779152018-04-16T17:57:00.000-07:002018-04-16T17:57:13.408-07:00Alien Intrusion: Unmasking a Deception<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UHzLIpiYX60/Ws0at3e0TvI/AAAAAAAACpQ/7gtmkvwYFNQQDW2D_nSl0qsGFUVfrt6TgCLcBGAs/s1600/Alien-intrusion.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="391" height="320" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UHzLIpiYX60/Ws0at3e0TvI/AAAAAAAACpQ/7gtmkvwYFNQQDW2D_nSl0qsGFUVfrt6TgCLcBGAs/s320/Alien-intrusion.jpg" width="223" /></a>Documentary<br />2018 / 109 minutes<br /><b>RATING: 8/10</b><br /><br />Can we dismiss UFO sightings as just a bunch of hysteria, or perhaps as misidentification? Is it a matter of weather balloons being mistaken for visitors from another planet? <br /><br />Before you answer consider this: millions have reported UFO sightings, including American former president, Jimmy Carter. And while some of those might be weather balloons, tricks of the sun, or other optical illusions, what are we to think of the many who claim that have had a "close encounter of the fourth kind" <i>- who claim that they've actually seen aliens themselves?</i><br /><br />This fascinating documentary, produced by Creation Ministries International, doesn't offer the answers you might expect from a Christian creationist organization. Early on it seems as if they are making the case that at least some of these sightings and encounters are, in fact, real. They share reports from former air force officials, the findings of researchers, still unexplained film footage, and other evidence.<br /><br />But are these encounters with actual aliens...or is there something else at work here? Even as a case is made that some of these encounters must be real, we're also told why they can't be <i>aliens</i>. The distances in space are simply too vast, the speeds required too high, to the point that physics seems to rule out the possibility that we are encountering visitors from far distant galaxies.<br /><br />So what are they?<br /><br />SPOILER ALERT: author Gary Bates and others argue that these are, in fact, spiritual beings - demons - <i>masquerading</i> <i>as aliens</i>.&nbsp; It's quite the intriguing premise!<br /><br />The film offers lots of evidence for this position, with one particularly interesting bit being how the shape of UFOs seems to "evolve" to match up with people's expectations. As Gary Bates notes:<br /><blockquote class="tr_bq">"...UFOs seem to appear within the understanding of the culture of the time. UFOs in the late 1800s appeared like airships. The ancient Romans and Greeks have stories of flying shields with occupants on board. American Indians have legends of flying canoes with people on board. And as we approached our rocket age...[they] started to take on the silver, shiny type of shapes."</blockquote>Similarly, "aliens" used to claim to be from Mars, Venus, and Saturn. However, now that we know those planets are not hosts to "massive civilizations of extra terrestrials" the aliens no longer claim to be from Mars or Venus. Instead they say they are from other systems or galaxies.<br /><br />There's also the correlation between UFO belief and occult experimentation – many "abductees" have dabbled in the “dark arts.” In asking for contact with demons, did they unknowingly invite these encounters? It is worth noting, too, that the messages “aliens” pass on are often direct attacks on the Bible, portraying Jesus not as the Son of God, but merely as some advanced alien. Even more interesting, several people who have been plagued by alien encounters, report that these encounters were very different after they became Christians. When they rebuked these "aliens" in the name of Jesus, they would leave!<br /><br /><b>Cautions</b><br /><b><br /></b>The only caution I can think of would be concern age-appropriateness. The nature of "talking head" documentaries is that children aren't usually interested. But just in case they are, parents should be aware there is a brief discussion lasting a few minutes concerning claims some abductees make regarding sexual violations by aliens. It is far from lurid, with Dove Foundation <a href="http://www.dove.org/review/12582-alien-intrusion-unmasking-a-deception/" target="_blank">describing</a> it as "clinical, clean talk."<br /><br /><b>Conclusion</b><br /><br />This is will be an intriguing documentary for any and all who are fascinated by UFOs, by science fiction, and by aliens. While the primary audience is meant to be Christians&nbsp;it would also be a great conversation-starter with unbelieving friends about how the Bible offers explanations for all of life...even including alien encounters!<br /><br />One important note: there is another DVD, also featuring Gary Bates, called <i>Alien Intrusion </i>that is simply a powerpoint video lecture.<i>&nbsp;</i>It has&nbsp;a different subtitle (one it shares with the Gary Bates' book that inspired them both)&nbsp;<i>Alien Intrusion: <u>UFOs and The Evolution Connection.</u></i>&nbsp;The documentary is called&nbsp;<i>Alien Intrusion: <u>Unmasking a Deception</u>. </i>While the powerpoint lecture is interesting too, what you really want is the documentary, so be sure to check the subtitle and get the right one!<br /><br />It is available at <a href="http://creation.com/">Creation.com</a>&nbsp;under the "Store" tab at the top of the page.<br /> <i><br /></i><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0ZxYkM7PB7U" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-11998881626338875732018-03-08T23:24:00.003-08:002018-03-08T23:29:36.449-08:00Genesis: Paradise lost (part 1)Documentary<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AQIeYioLLws/WqIWEc6yWfI/AAAAAAAACoA/w2F_ILqvsggphRrseVxyBdynVIofH2uBACLcBGAs/s1600/Genesis-Paradise-lost.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="404" height="320" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AQIeYioLLws/WqIWEc6yWfI/AAAAAAAACoA/w2F_ILqvsggphRrseVxyBdynVIofH2uBACLcBGAs/s320/Genesis-Paradise-lost.jpg" width="230" /></a></div>109 minutes / 2018<br /><b>RATING: 8/10</b><br /><br />There have been some very good Genesis-related resources coming out in the last few years and this is another. The intent with this one is to provide a visually stunning introduction to creation science. It's going over the basics, but along with the expected talking heads laying out Creationism 101, there are impressive computer animations of the goings on for every day in the Creation Week. There's even a 3D version of the film that, on a big-screen TV, makes this quite the immersive experience!<br /><br />So who should see this? The target audience is Christians and interested unbelievers who want to learn what creationists believe about the opening chapters of Scripture. There is a lot packed in here – perhaps&nbsp;<i>too </i>much because the sheer volume of material only allows the producers to cover topics in big and broad ways. They simply don't have the time to offer any sort of nuanced evolutionary counters to their own points.<br /><b><br /></b><b>A CAUTION</b><br /><br />Now, that's fine; it just means this isn't a film to give to the hardened critic. It also means there is one danger Christians have to watch for: anyone new to creationism, after seeing the film, might be left with the impression that there are no compelling arguments, and no evidence of any kind, for evolution. That would be a dangerous sort of naïveté.<br /><br />While that's an important caution, this is a fantastic film. There is so much to love here, starting with the narrator Voddie Baucham – if you've ever heard this Reformed pastor and professor speak you'll know he's just perfect for this role. Fun guests include Ken Ham and Ray Comfort. The professors include some familiar names like Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. David Menton, and Dr. John Baumgardner.<br /><br />The topics covered include:<br /><br /><ul><li>an answer to the distant starlight problem</li><li>fossils on the top of mountains</li><li>carbon-dating</li><li>intricate complexity</li><li>reasons to believe the universe is young</li><li>the Law of Biogenesis</li><li>finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones (said to be millions of years old)</li><li>the pepper moth fallacy</li><li>the many human "missing links"</li><li>how if natural selection can explain the survival of the fittest, it doesn't explain the <i>arrival </i>of the fittest</li><li>and much, <i>much </i>more!</li></ul><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><b><br /></b>One of the film's strengths is the sheer width and breadth that it covers. That is also its most notable weakness: there is just <i>so much information! </i>I was already familiar with most of what was presented and I still found it on the overwhelming side. But, as faults go, that's a wonderful one to have – it just means this is an excellent candidate for repeated viewings, and well worth buying!<br /><br />The other strength is all the computer animations. If they are just a shade from being perfectly life-like, they are perfectly gorgeous. The Creation Week had been rendered with respect: God is never depicted, and naked Adam and Eve are only shown at extreme distance, or only in parts (their feet, or hands, or faces). Of course depicting the Creation Week visually is going to involve a lot of imaginative interpretation to fill in all the missing details; these folks have done so with the tact and care.<br /><br />So, again, who should see this? I think the many talking heads means that&nbsp;<i>Genesis: Paradise Lost</i>&nbsp;isn't for children – it would probably have to be older teens and up. But for anyone who's interested in learning about our origins, and about how we should understand the opening chapters of the Bible, this is going to be a treat!<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8Sq02Mj-fKk" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-13165147181137772192018-03-08T16:35:00.001-08:002018-03-08T16:58:20.263-08:00Misty<a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9tZ0nmEK-UI/WqHUPCr6hCI/AAAAAAAACnI/zWI1md6b35oiEZof9tgDxNioUxlckn-eACLcBGAs/s1600/misty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="420" height="320" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9tZ0nmEK-UI/WqHUPCr6hCI/AAAAAAAACnI/zWI1md6b35oiEZof9tgDxNioUxlckn-eACLcBGAs/s320/misty.jpg" width="240" /></a>Family / Drama<br />1961 / 91 minutes<br /><b>RATING: 7/10</b><br /><br />If you have girls in your home there's a good chance you've already heard of Marguerite Henry and her most famous book <i>Misty of Chincoteague. </i>It's the story of two orphans who, after coming to live with their grandparents, fix their minds on buying a pony named Phantom.<br /><br />But it's not going to be easy. First, Phantom is a <i>wild </i>pony, running loose on the neighboring island of Assateague, and to this point no one has been able to catch her. If she is caught, it'll cost the two children $100 to buy her and they don't have any money. And last but not least, Phantom is three years old already, and their grandfather says that no one can gentle a pony that's been wild that long.<br /><br />But while these two have their work cut out for them, they're up to the task!<br /><br />This is a faithful adaptation of the book, and quite the sweet film. The grandparents are loving and kind, but no pushovers. The kids are energetic, a little mischievous, but respectful. It's just good old-fashioned family entertainment.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />Language concerns are limited to a few instances of "gee."<br /><br />At one point bets are placed on a horse race between the nearby islands' fastest ponies. The grandfather gets caught up in this and seems to even travel to another island to find more people to bet with. Overall this is a minor element in the film, amounting mostly to an opportunity for jokes. But children need to be told that we should never seek to become wealthy at another's expense – that's what's wrong with gambling.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />The moral of this story is an old-fashioned one, and while powerful, it is gently presented: "love is not possessive; love seeks the best for the other." I'm not going to spoil things by telling you how that moral is learned, but if you have a sensitive daughter or two, there might be a little crying at the end of this one...though it certainly ends on a happy note.<br /><i><br /></i><i>Sweetest quote: When the town mistakenly concludes the grandfather has fallen on hard times, he hugs his grandchildren and exclaims:&nbsp;</i><i>"They think I'm poor? I'm the richest man on this whole island!"</i><br /><br />&nbsp; <iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/teqr9SZpGmY" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-80958438228727903712018-03-08T11:14:00.002-08:002018-11-02T11:56:39.071-07:00Incredible creatures that define designDocumentary<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/--PiL_UZkYgA/WqF_EDhStGI/AAAAAAAACms/b93_krONg-Q3t895hpDEG6M3DRtSpFYzQCLcBGAs/s1600/define-design.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="420" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/--PiL_UZkYgA/WqF_EDhStGI/AAAAAAAACms/b93_krONg-Q3t895hpDEG6M3DRtSpFYzQCLcBGAs/s320/define-design.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>62 min / 2011<br /><b>Rating: 7/10</b><br /><br />The folks who brought us the 3-film series <i><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2015/02/incredible-creatures-that-defy.html" target="_blank">Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution</a> </i>are back, and with a fun new twist on the incredible design we can find in God's creation.<br /><br />This time they are looking into the field of&nbsp;<a href="http://reformedperspective.ca/biomimicry-recognizes-the-genius-but-not-the-genius-behind-the-wonders-of-creation/" target="_blank">biomimicry</a>&nbsp;– this involves engineers applying the innovations and creativity they find in the natural world to help them solve challenges they face in the civilized world.<br /><br />So, for example, a fan manufacturer looking to make a more powerful, but quieter, model decided to look into the way that an owl can travel quickly but silently through the air. The closer they looked at the design of its wings, the more they found there was to learn and imitate!<br /><br />Other examples of brilliant design in creation that the documentary explores include:<br /><ul><li>sticky burrs</li><li>spirals found everywhere in nature</li><li>the glue used by mussels</li><li>the aerodynamics of the box fish</li><li>and the strange way that butterflies can give off such beautiful colors even though some have no pigment in their wings.</li></ul>In one instance after another, even as engineers use Nature as their inspiration, they're forced to admit that their best efforts can't match the genius they find there.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />Unlike the <i>Incredible&nbsp;Creations The Defy Evolution </i>series<i>, </i>in this film&nbsp;God is never given the credit that is His due. Instead, this is more like an Intelligent Design presentation, in which the genius found in creation is celebrated, without any specific mention made of Who that Genius is.<br /><br />The only other caution concerns a scene in the section on mussel glue. Here we see a brief enactment of a man having a heart attack at a restaurant. He then presumably receives care using glue, rather than stitches. It's not all that shocking, but more so than anything else in the film, and might alarm some small children.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />This is one for that will most intrigue the science geeks among us. I think families with older kids – maybe 12 and up – could enjoy this together, particularly if they have watched documentaries together before. But it does require some knowledge to fully appreciate what's being explained – younger children simply won't know enough about aerodynamics, or about how loud fans can be, or what pigmentation is, to really appreciate how "Nature" – God! – has done it all so much better than even our best and brightest can do (even after being given an example to imitate).<br /><br />You can watch the trailer below, and view it for free on Amazon Prime.<br /><br /><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="270" mozallowfullscreen="" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/215580443" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="480"></iframe> <a href="https://vimeo.com/215580443">Incredible Creatures That DEFINE Design - Trailer</a> from <a href="https://vimeo.com/explorationfilms">Exploration Films</a> on <a href="https://vimeo.com/">Vimeo</a>.Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-45862627515570134142018-02-15T13:17:00.000-08:002018-03-08T16:45:56.204-08:00Storm: Luther's forbidden letterFamily / Drama<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vkJrult_XWs/WpmgjFZDXEI/AAAAAAAAClE/j5Fxro6eBOwB5C1QkBk9eM4N2xHmbe2NQCLcBGAs/s1600/Storm.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="420" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vkJrult_XWs/WpmgjFZDXEI/AAAAAAAAClE/j5Fxro6eBOwB5C1QkBk9eM4N2xHmbe2NQCLcBGAs/s320/Storm.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>105 minutes / 2017<br />RATING: 7/10<br /><br />Storm Voeten is the 12-year-old son of a printer, living in 1500s Antwerp. Martin Luther has written his <em>95 Theses </em>and his ideas are a source of debate and division across Europe. That's also true in the Voeten household, where Storm's mother, a staunch Catholic, doesn't even want to hear Luther's name. But his father is interesting in learning more...and he's even willing to print Luther's ideas.<br /><br />The opening scene has Luther making his brief, appearance in the film. He's writing a letter, even as a squadron of soldiers is heading his way. The letter is entrusted to the care of an assistant to take to Antwerp.<br /><br />Though the events in this film are more of the "inspired by" variety, rather than purporting to be historically accurate, there is some real history here. Luther did send a letter to Antwerp. In the film the letter is a rallying cry against the Catholic Church, and a call to rely on Jesus alone. In real life, while we don't have the letter itself, other accounts make it sound as if it had an additional target, the Anabaptists. But that doesn't come up in the film.<br /><br />When Luther's assistant arrives in Antwerp he seeks out Storm's father. Voeten Sr. accepts the printing job, even though the town's Inquisitor has already arrested another printer for producing forbidden Protestant materials.<br /><br />And that's when the film turns into a chase movie. The authorities catch Storm's father in the act of printing and arrest him, but not before Storm runs off with the letter's printing plate. He gets chased through the alleys and only escapes when 12-year-old street orphan Maria, and her handy sling, intervene.<br /><br />Now it's up to Storm to figure out how to get the letter printed, and how to save his dad.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />There are no language concerns, and any "sexual content" is limited to one short kiss between the two 12-year-olds at the film's end.<br /><br />But there is a fair amount of violence. All of it is muted and some of it takes place off screen. But here's a partial list:<br /><ul><li>a printer's burned hand is shown briefly (one second)</li><li>the printer is tortured by the Inquisitor – via some form of water boarding – and while we don't see it happen, we do briefly hear the man pleading</li><li>a couple of soldiers get hit in the head by rocks hurled by Maria and her sling</li><li>Maria hits a soldier in the head with a pole</li><li>Storm hits a soldier in the head with a pole</li><li>a man is murdered off screen before Storm arrives, but we do see the body with just a little blood for a second or two</li></ul>In addition, there is quite a lot of tension. Some of it involves chases, and some of it involves not knowing what will happen next – when Storm's father is set to be burned at the stake, the young audience doesn't know that Storm will manage to save the day, and that makes this quite scary.<br /><br />That's why I'd say the target audience for this is probably 12 and up.<br /><br />One theological concern: Maria thinks that the Virgin Mary helps her. Storm tells her Luther's thoughts on idols, and that Mary is just an ordinary woman, but the issue is left unsettled - by film's end, Maria hasn't clearly changed her mind.&nbsp; So that might be a good topic to discuss with younger viewers<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><b><br /></b>The big caution with this film concerns the tension. This is more a "chase film" than a theological exploration of Luther's views, but that might just make it perfect for the younger audience it's aimed at. While the plot is a bit simple for mom and dad, the authentic 1500s setting will keep their attention. This is good, clean, even educational, fun.<br /><br />The film was carefully shot so that it could be dubbed into a number of different languages. If you pay attention you'll notice that the principal characters often speak with their mouths obscured in some way. Sometimes we see their mouth when they start speaking but, as they continue, the camera cuts away. That's because this was shot in Dutch, and this clever camera work means the dubbing is hardly noticeable in the English version.<br /><br />I can't actually find a trailer of the English version, so here below is the Dutch trailer.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BcbR4at2p_U" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-8859607919209018412018-01-20T17:18:00.000-08:002018-01-20T17:37:12.330-08:00PollyannaFamily<br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qvulgEViUGM/WmOzyamMG5I/AAAAAAAACiM/g4EcV3KKEdse5V3j9JjDboz-vi7Pqy1cACLcBGAs/s1600/pollyanna.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="500" data-original-width="348" height="320" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qvulgEViUGM/WmOzyamMG5I/AAAAAAAACiM/g4EcV3KKEdse5V3j9JjDboz-vi7Pqy1cACLcBGAs/s320/pollyanna.jpg" width="222" /></a></div>2003 / 99 minutes<br /><b>Rating: 8/10</b><br /><br />Aside from a change of setting, this is a faithful adaption of the source book. Yes, moving it from Vermont to England will leave viewers a little surprised, especially if they've grown up watching the 1960s Disney version. But accents aside, this is the more authentic version and if you loved the book, you'll love this film.<br /><br />For those who don't already know, Pollyanna is a poor but cheerful girl who, after becoming orphaned, is sent to live with her very rich, and very strait-laced aunt Polly. The two have very different ways of viewing the world, with the joyful Pollyanna seeing nothing but wonder, despite the losses she's faced, and aunt Polly seeing nothing but the problems, despite the riches that surround her. So whose worldview is going to win out? Is Pollyanna going to stop giving out hugs, or is her aunt Polly going to get over her reluctance to be touched? Something has to give!<br /><br />One reason parents will appreciate this story is because of Pollyanna's "glad game." This is something her father taught her – he explained that even when things aren't going our way, there is always something to be glad about. He first taught her the game one Christmas when Pollyanna was hoping for a doll, but the only gift sent to her poor family was a pair of tiny crutches. So what is there to be happy about crutches? It took some thinking, but eventually father and daughter came up with something: they could be glad because at least “we didn’t need to use them!”<br /><br />As Pollyanna gets to know the people in her new community, both young and old, she teaches her game to them, and in doing so, transforms her community - they too, start to see the silver lining to each dark cloud. But what about aunt Polly? What is she going to think about the game?<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><b><br /></b>It's worth noting that the "glad game" can be taken to extremes. For an example, in the book, when an older man breaks a leg, Pollyanna notes he could be glad that he broke just the one leg. Well, okay. But, as the Preacher said, there is a time for everything, and that includes mourning. So maybe it is fine for the man to just simply be sad for a time at the pain and suffering that's happened to him.<br /><br />That said, I don't think many of us are in danger of overdoing our gladness, so couldn't we all do with a good dose of this Pollyanna-ish thinking?<br /><br />The only other caution concerns one shocking/sad moment that will cause young viewers distress – near the end of the film Pollyanna gets seriously injured. It all happens in a flash, so nothing gory is shown, but our girls needed to be reassured that Pollyanna would recover.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><div><br /></div><div>Young ladies are going to love this one, and I think young lads may even be up for it, with a little encouraging. And if mom and dad can get past the British accents, they, too, are sure to love this well-acted, authentic adaption of a timeless classic.</div><div><br /></div><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TI52WZqMA5w" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-83231617879947201892017-12-15T16:47:00.000-08:002018-01-20T17:20:04.567-08:00The Boxcar Children<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uAkSyRjsvsE/WmKPtUn_kLI/AAAAAAAAChY/Vo0mK0iuJNk4p8BzBg0LwViMKroePezMQCLcBGAs/s1600/Boxcar-children.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="500" data-original-width="351" height="400" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uAkSyRjsvsE/WmKPtUn_kLI/AAAAAAAAChY/Vo0mK0iuJNk4p8BzBg0LwViMKroePezMQCLcBGAs/s400/Boxcar-children.jpg" width="280" /></a>Animated / Children's<br />2013 / 81 minutes<br /><b>Rating: 7/10</b><br /><b><br /></b><i>The Boxcar Children </i>is the first title in a popular and still expanding children's series of books. And just like the book, the film is about four children - three brothers and one sister - who have lost their parents, and have been told they will have to live with their grandfather. But Henry, Jessie, Violet, and Benny don't know their grandfather at all, and imagine that, because he never came to visit, he must be a cruel man. So they run away.<br /><br />The first part of the story is about how they get by, day to day, all on their own. It's when they find an old, long abandoned, railway boxcar that things start looking up for them. Then the older brother can go into town to do odd jobs, and the other three can start setting up the boxcar as a real home for them.<br /><br />This is a children's story so of course it has a happy ending. And I don't think I give away too much to say it involves their cruel grandfather not being cruel at all.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />The only cautions would concern language: in one instance a character says "holy mollie" and in another someone utters "oh my gosh" but that is the extent of it.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />While there are a few moments of tension – especially early on when they are being chased by a couple who wants to put the children to work in their bakery – this is a pretty gentle movie. The plot is also simple, and I say that not as a criticism, but only to note this is more of a children's film than something the whole family will enjoy. Mom and dad won't mind too much, but I don't expect teens will enjoy sitting through it.<br /><br />But if you children who have been reading the Boxcar Children series, then this will be a treat. The first book in the series,&nbsp;<i>The Boxcar Children,&nbsp;</i>was published in 1924, but the series really started gaining in popularity in 1942, when it was reissued. The author, Gertrude Chandler Warner, went on to write a total of 19 stories about the four siblings (and I've been told that these 19 are much better than the more than 100+ that have followed). There's no Christian content in the book or the film but as you might expect from a story written almost 100 years ago, there's nothing all that objectionable either.<br /><div><br /></div>So it is a good safe film that kids will love, and parents won't mind.<br /><br /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8TVLHl98y1E" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-41724038517680250422017-11-15T03:00:00.000-08:002018-03-09T08:43:08.000-08:00Sherlock Jr.<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Jv-KOEZ4klk/Wcwp0rvJ8hI/AAAAAAAACWU/2xLitlIAsHcnE2epfLxtzCgDUo9l41dmQCLcBGAs/s1600/Sherlock-Jr.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="560" data-original-width="373" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Jv-KOEZ4klk/Wcwp0rvJ8hI/AAAAAAAACWU/2xLitlIAsHcnE2epfLxtzCgDUo9l41dmQCLcBGAs/s320/Sherlock-Jr.jpg" width="213" /></a>Comedy / Family<br />1924 / 44 minutes<br /><b>RATING: 8/10</b><br /><br />For anyone who wants to get their kids interested in the golden oldies, <i>Sherlock Jr.&nbsp;</i>may be the perfect introduction. This is a black and white classic with the frenetic pace of a Saturday morning cartoon – the action never stops!<br /><br />Buster Keaton plays the part of a movie theater janitor/projectionist who has ambitions about becoming a great detective and winning the hand of a certain beautiful girl.<br /><br />But he's not the only fellow interested in the lass. Standing in his way is a tall, dark, and handsome rival who, we quickly find out, has no scruples – when no one's looking this scoundrel steals a watch from the girl's dad. But wait, there's a theft? Isn't this an opportunity for a detective wannabe to show his stuff? Buster offers to do an investigation, but he is humiliated twice over when the clever scoundrel frames him for the theft, and then the girl's father asks Buster to leave and never come back.<br /><br />Things are looking bad for Buster, but the story just keeps getting better and better. Dejected, Buster returns to the theater in time for the afternoon showing and gets the movie started. But as it's playing he falls asleep, <i>and in his dream he joins in on the action</i>.<br /><br />It just so happens to be a detective story. And it just so happens that Buster dreams himself in as the suave and savvy star detective. In this film within the film it goes a lot better for Buster, as he brilliantly tricks and evades and a whole horde of villains.<br /><br />The best action scene in the movie is when Buster, in hot pursuit of the villains, hops on the front handlebars of a motorbike being driven by his trusted sidekick. But, unbeknownst to Buster, just as the motorbike started off, his sidekick fell off – Buster is on it alone, up front on the handlebars of the speeding bike, urging the absent driver to be a little more careful about the way he's driving!<br /><br />But what's going to happen when Buster wakes up? Well, even as he solving mysteries in his dream world, his beautiful girl is figuring out things in the real one.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />There are moments of peril, and a brief occasion or two of fisticuffs that might be a bit scary for the very young.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />At just 44 minutes, and jammed pack with action, this might be the best silent film to share with modern audiences. And - added bonus! - this film is so old it is in the public domain, and can be watched for free in the video below.<br /><br /><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cC1aD7e4ZHs" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-89761296892750512832017-10-09T17:24:00.001-07:002017-10-09T17:31:54.669-07:00Torchlighters: the Martin Luther Story<a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V9fDX2MLd-A/Wdv2xLDWasI/AAAAAAAACZg/Q0DGOaV69EU5srhnyAqZ7Axh4r6fPy4cQCLcBGAs/s1600/The-Martin-Luther-Story.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V9fDX2MLd-A/Wdv2xLDWasI/AAAAAAAACZg/Q0DGOaV69EU5srhnyAqZ7Axh4r6fPy4cQCLcBGAs/s320/The-Martin-Luther-Story.jpg" /></a>Animated / Family<br />2016 / 34 minutes<br /><b>Rating: 7/10</b><br /><br />The strength of this film is its short length. At just 34 minutes, it can be shown in the space of a single school period. For the pre-teens this is intended for that might be just the right length, with the quick pace, and colorful animation sure to grab most students’ attention.<br /><br />But the biggest weakness of this short film is….its length. It is far too short to tell this story with the gravitas it needs – Luther’s spiritual wrestling is dealt with in just 7 minutes! It also ends abruptly, with Luther busy translating the Bible into German in Wartburg Castle. The narrator then spends just a single minute summing up the whole of the second half of Luther's life. And then the credits role.<br /><br /><b>CAUTIONS</b><br /><br />There are a just a couple cautions to consider, with the most striking involving a prophetic dream by Frederick the Elector, Martin Luther's long-time protector. After getting kidnapped (by friends, for his own safety's sake) Luther is told that the very night he nailed up his 95 Theses, Frederick had a dream about a monk writing on a church door with a quill that was so long it extended all the way to Rome "where it toppled the crown off of a lion." This is said to be the reason the Frederick was willing to defend his rebellious trouble-making monk: God had told him ahead of time that his monk was going to topple the pope. But, according to The problem? According to Thomas A. Fudge's biography&nbsp;<i><a href="https://books.google.ca/books?id=TYYAAwAAQBAJ&amp;lpg=PA197&amp;ots=Bi5iyVQNbj&amp;dq=frederick%20the%20wise%20dreams%20of%20luther&amp;pg=PA198#v=onepage&amp;q=1591&amp;f=false" target="_blank">Jan Hus</a>, </i>this story is found in many forms from 1591 on, but that is near 75 years after the events in question. So is this dream fact or fiction? The movie portrays it as unquestioned fact, but I think we have reason to wonder if this might just be a popular myth.<br /><br />And, at the film's conclusion there is &nbsp;a passing, two or three second shot of a title page illustration from one of Luther's books depicting Christ on the cross, with Luther and John Frederick I, Elector of Saxony kneeling below. I make mention of it, for any who consider this a violation of the Second Commandment.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b><br /><br />This is a great film for children who don't yet have the attention span for a longer Luther film. It is well done, and will keep most children engaged. But for children with the attention span for it, and teenagers and up, the better film to watch is the Oscar-nominated, 105-minute, 1953,&nbsp;<i>Martin Luther</i>, which I review <i><a href="http://www.reelconservative.com/2013/03/martin-luther.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</i><br /><br />Americans can rent or buy the digital version of <i>The Martin Luther Story</i> <a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01K2MTPV0/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thereelcons0a-20&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;creativeASIN=B01K2MTPV0&amp;linkId=7e14385858eabce348306c5ae7337295" target="_blank">here</a>, and Canadians can buy it on DVD <a href="https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B01FMPT5TY/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thereelconser-20&amp;camp=15121&amp;creative=330641&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;creativeASIN=B01FMPT5TY&amp;linkId=74fb8b11b97ff7c076e84402cdcf6c5e" target="_blank">here</a>. You can check out the trailer below.<br /><br /><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CeslJ97HsyM?start=31" width="560"></iframe>Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-354213314152149420.post-39253331434306229632017-09-25T21:46:00.000-07:002017-10-09T17:34:30.448-07:00The Newtons' Workshop<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1KD5cl9mC2Q/V_gMxHTiTcI/AAAAAAAABhU/aggxLCR5RCwRHpSjUXNnqY1rjHAJi3RWACLcB/s1600/the%2BNewtons%2527%2BWorkshop.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1KD5cl9mC2Q/V_gMxHTiTcI/AAAAAAAABhU/aggxLCR5RCwRHpSjUXNnqY1rjHAJi3RWACLcB/s320/the%2BNewtons%2527%2BWorkshop.jpg" width="222" /></a></div><div class="MsoNormal">Children's TV series<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal">1997 / 226 minutes<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><b>Rating: 7/10</b><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">That stars of this children's "edutainment" show are most certainly Grandma and Grandpa Newton, who have more spare time and are quirkier than any grandparents you know. Over the course of this 8-episode series, this set of seniors is ready to help any time their grandkids have a question or a problem.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">What kind of help?<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">Well, in Episode 1, when granddaughter Trisha and her friend Megan decide to do a science project on "world building" Grandpa Newton just happens to have a workshop full of mechanical models that show how wondrously God has designed this planet<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">And in Episode 4, when an astronaut's visit has Trisha curious about space, Grandpa helps puts the solar system in perspective. He creates a scale model in which the Sun is the size of a beachball, and Earth is almost a soccer field away.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">It's fast-paced, funny, and has my daughters' attention even after repeated viewings.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">What I like is that they teach science from a conservative Christian perspective, which isn't surprising considering these are produced by the generally Calvinist, Moody Bible Institute. And, while I'm not up for quite as many viewings as my kids, these are entertaining enough that I don't mind seeing the repeats now and again.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal"><b>CAUTIONS</b><o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">That said, I did have a caution to share. In Episode 8, "The Pollution Solution," Grandma and Grandpa tackle the problem of pollution, and while most of this episode is sensible and helpful, there is a dash of confusion and a spoonful of tokenism mixed in.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">It begins with Dad calling a family meeting about the way everyone is wasting water. But he misrepresents the problem: he make it seem like long showers can contribute to drought, but shower water heads down pipes that will eventually return it right back to the lake or river it came from. Waste&nbsp;<i>is</i>&nbsp;happening here, but it isn't contributing to any drought. What's going down the drain, never to be seen again, is mom and dad's money, paying for water that isn't needed.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">The tokenism comes in when Tim and Trisha end up having a trash contest to see who can generate the least amount of trash over a week. What isn't addressed is that recycling costs money - it takes resources too - so some recycling&nbsp;<a href="https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2015/10/06/shocker-cbs-highlights-just-how-wasteful-recycling-can-be">isn't always the</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://bigthink.com/dangerous-ideas/14-recycling-is-a-waste">responsible choice</a>.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">We see a similar sort of tokenism when the Newtons briefly address global warming. This episode was made 20 years ago so, compared to anything today, the doom and gloom is a lot less pronounced. But we do get fed today's typical non-solutions: Tim and Trisha suggest global warming can be addressed by "walking on short errands, or riding your bike, or carpooling to work." Sounds good, and you'll hear suggestions like that made today too. But it misrepresents the radical nature of the changes global warming proponents are really after. It isn't a matter of more bikes, but&nbsp;<a href="http://www.npr.org/2016/08/18/479349760/should-we-be-having-kids-in-the-age-of-climate-change">fewer</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/12/want-to-fight-climate-change-have-fewer-children">children</a>. Now, if the show's producers had heard that sort of argument 20 years ago I think they might have seen through it. They'd know from the Bible that children are a blessing to be embraced, so when the world says the opposite – that they are a curse to be avoided – that gives Christians reason to be skeptical.&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">That said, Grandpa Newton has some good things to say in this episode too, and I think it can be watched to some benefit so long as mom and dad are there to talk their kids through it. But if you aren't buying this as a package set, then DVD #4 might be worth giving a miss.<br /><br /><b>CONCLUSION</b></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />So who would like&nbsp;this best? While the producers recommend this for 7-12, I'd lower that on both sides by about 2 years. This is best suited for 5-10, although Mom or Dad can enjoy it too.</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />Overall this is just a fun, clean, biblically-based, science lesson wrapped up as family TV series. It entertained our family and educated them too - not a bad combination!</div><div class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></div><br />Jon Dykstrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13867992075746045379noreply@blogger.com0