I have published a UML class diagram (comments welcomed) based on your
document and some of the entities that you did not model:
http://www.ebpml.org/architecture1.htm
I personally like much better this version of the architecture because
the notion of provider and consumer does not appear as strongly as in
the 11/14/02 version. It would be really easy to introduce the notion of
MEP "initiator" as a replacement to provider. This will not change the
model at all. This new proposal should enable a much more peer-to-peer
focus of the W-SOA.
Jean-Jacques
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]
On
>>Behalf Of Francis McCabe
>>Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:31 PM
>>To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>>Subject: A diagram of concepts and relationships
>>
>>This diagram is a partial snapshot of the concepts & relationships in
>>the proposed refactoring