The DivX Web Player could not write the video file to
disk. Please check you have write permissions in the
download folder. You can change the download folder
from the preference screen of the DivX Web Player.

I have updated DivX player so I dont know whats going on. Anyone else?

I was wondering who would put this up, TG would be a good bet,but no Paul the maverick mod has excelled,exposing the actoors within the BS
"Al Queda" false flag scenario._________________The poster previously known as "Newspeak International"

None of the above links work now, but it is still up here:
BBC Panorama: London Under Attack (the show that predicted 7/7):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7uIjg9dtoI_________________'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.

The BBC was today deluged with complaints after it televised a mock-up of a terrorist attack on London last night.

More than 140 people rang the BBC to complain about Panorama's London Under Attack, which showed the results of a fictitious chemical tanker explosion in the city.

The dramatised documentary, which showed how unprepared emergency services are for a major terrorist attack in the capital, was watched by nearly 2 million people.

The programme, which the government had denounced as "irresponsible", sparked widespread consternation among some viewers in a latter day re-run of Orson Welles' infamous War of the Worlds radio broadcast which terrified listeners of America in 1938.

"Presumably you did not intend to set the whole country into a state of panic, but that is what you did. My son phoned me from London, absolutely terrified. His friend had received a phone call from her mother who thought London was under attack, so she panicked and it snowballed," said one viewer by email.

Others described the documentary as "totally irresponsible" and criticised the "seeming stupidity" of the BBC for showing it. One viewer went so far as to accuse the BBC of unwittingly aiding a terrorist attack.

"What are Panorama trying to do? Run a terrorist training school explaining how best to attack London? I know from just the introduction to this programme that a simple and effective way to bring London to a halt and to kill at least 300 people would be to target three underground trains. Blow front and back to stop the emergency services getting to the injured. If Panorama want to highlight shortcomings in our national preparation for a terrorist attack to the government, then there are better ways than this."

Around 50 viewers criticised the BBC for not flagging up the programme as a simulation during the broadcast, while 22 thought the progamme was too realistic.

However, the BBC defended the programme, saying its purpose was to "foster debate" and get viewers "to think about the issues".

A BBC spokeswoman admitted there was no simulation warning immediately prior to the show's broadcast, but said the BBC regularly informed viewers as to the fictional nature of the exercise throughout the 60-minute programme.

"There were a number of devices used throughout the show that events portrayed weren't actually happening."

She said lines of text indicating that events were "purely fictional" appeared throughout the show, while the date of the reports said May 25 rather than the real date of May 16.

The home secretary, David Blunkett, refused to take part in the programme after the BBC turned down his requests - which amounted to virtual copy approval and a list of all the other people taking part in the show.

The show's producer, Susan O'Keefe, accused the government of a "wall of silence" and said that some people who had agreed to appear on the show pulled out after intervention by senior government officials.

"We would call the press office of any one of the myriad organisations officially involved with civil contingencies. As soon as we identified ourselves, the conversation came to a close.

"The manner of termination varied from the polite promise to call back, referral to a colleague who would decline to comment - and finally the downright rude.

"One or two of the less discreet officials in these organisations revealed that their lack of participation was not their decision but resulted from an email sent by 'senior government officials'.

"They were thorough. No matter where we turned for advice or information, our way was barred," she wrote on the BBC website.

"Congratulations to the BBC in highlighting the failure of communication from the government on the risks we face from terrorist attack," emailed one enthusiastic viewer, while another described the programme as "fantastic".

"I can understand why the government were not happy about this - because the country is so ill prepared, and some of the blame is on their shoulders."

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum