A spotting scope has more power than a rifle scope - letting you see those .22 holes at 100 yards. If $ is a problem Harbor Freight has a cheap spotting scope. I'm sure it's not the best but at $50 it might be adequate.

Konuspot 80 or Vortex Nomad. Both can be had for $150 or so. If you want both a rifle scope and a spotting scope, cameralandny.com had a great deal on any Vortex Crossfire II scope, and you add on a Vortex Nomad 20-60x60 angled spotting scope for only $150. Great deal considering they are around $280-300 typically, and $339 for full blown retail. Out the door shipped, under 300 bucks for a great optics setup for the 100-200 yard range and for .22's.

Here's my nephew looking through the 6-18x44ao with the Vortex Nomad angled next to him. Hope this helps.

I have the konuspot 100. I really like it, but it is big and heavy. The picture is brighter on the 100 over the 80 and makes it easier to see. You will want a good tripod to go with the the spotting scope also. I use a slik tripod for mine. I also adapted an old IPhone to the set up to take pictures and video.

This is one of the reasons why I love calguns...
I just look at so many threads that I have no interest on and keep finding a lot of cool stuff.
Like this picture of the moon. How cool is that?! Who would thought that it was taken whit an iPhone

A spotting scope has more power than a rifle scope - letting you see those .22 holes at 100 yards. If $ is a problem Harbor Freight has a cheap spotting scope. I'm sure it's not the best but at $50 it might be adequate.

Don't waste your time trying out the NCstar, Barska, Yukon, Harbor Freight, UTG, Leapers or any of the other garbage optics. I started out with a Barska and I literally couldn't resolve a .223 hole at 100 yards on a non shoot-n-see target. It was so bad I just sold it. I went to a Redfield Rampage 20-60x60 and it was a big step up, but still wasn't all that great. I switched that awhile back to a Vortex Nomad, and I trust it out to about 350 yards or so, maybe 400. I can easily spot .22 holes on paper at 200 yards with this one and that is all I really need it for. It works really well for what I need, and didn't cost an arm and a leg. If I were to get a good one, I would probably look to a Kowa angled scope, a Vortex Viper HD, or Pentax PF-80ed or similar. There are a lot out there but they range from hundreds to thousands for anything worthwhile.

Don't waste your time trying out the NCstar, Barska, Yukon, Harbor Freight, UTG, Leapers or any of the other garbage optics. I started out with a Barska and I literally couldn't resolve a .223 hole at 100 yards on a non shoot-n-see target. It was so bad I just sold it. I went to a Redfield Rampage 20-60x60 and it was a big step up, but still wasn't all that great. I switched that awhile back to a Vortex Nomad, and I trust it out to about 350 yards or so, maybe 400. I can easily spot .22 holes on paper at 200 yards with this one and that is all I really need it for. It works really well for what I need, and didn't cost an arm and a leg. If I were to get a good one, I would probably look to a Kowa angled scope, a Vortex Viper HD, or Pentax PF-80ed or similar. There are a lot out there but they range from hundreds to thousands for anything worthwhile.

One more thing for ya. I have currently a Vortex Nomad 20-60x60 angled eyepiece scope, and a Pentax PF-80ED straight eyepiece. Its kind of an unfair comparison because the Pentax is about a $1300.00 scope, and the Vortex is a $330 scope. For reference, this is a tabletop comparison from your average joe, not some fancy setup in a controlled environment. Looking through these scopes, there is a LOT of mirage today, very humid here at 0 feet above sea level, and its a very sunny day in Humboldt. The trees were lasered with a Leica LRF1200 at just shy of 250 yards. Both scopes were on 40x power so I could get the Samsung Galaxy SIII to work with the scope. Again, its a VERY low tech comparison but it will give you an idea.

I'll start off with the $300 Vortex Nomad scope.

Now with the Pentax at about 4 times the price:

I notice some details from the Pentax that I just couldn't resolve on the Vortex, but at 300 yards, I can pretty comfortably pick out .30 cal holes on a shoot-n-see or on my white butcher paper targets with black spots for targets.

You can be the judge, but with 2 decent scopes, there are dramatic differences. I literally wouldn't be able to get half of the picture either of those two scopes took at 250 yards with a Barska. It was just like it was always fuzzy on days like today hence me getting rid of it. Don't waste the $100 on a cheap scope because you'll likely be able to better resolve an image with a riflescope a lot better even with lower power. I used to spot my shots with a Truglo 6-24x44 at 200 yards a LOT better than a 60x barska, and the truglo cost me a whole 79.99 compared to the $100 spotting scope I couldn't even make out the targets with.

Don't waste your time trying out the NCstar, Barska, Yukon, Harbor Freight, UTG, Leapers or any of the other garbage optics. I started out with a Barska and I literally couldn't resolve a .223 hole at 100 yards on a non shoot-n-see target. It was so bad I just sold it. I went to a Redfield Rampage 20-60x60 and it was a big step up, but still wasn't all that great. I switched that awhile back to a Vortex Nomad, and I trust it out to about 350 yards or so, maybe 400. I can easily spot .22 holes on paper at 200 yards with this one and that is all I really need it for. It works really well for what I need, and didn't cost an arm and a leg. If I were to get a good one, I would probably look to a Kowa angled scope, a Vortex Viper HD, or Pentax PF-80ed or similar. There are a lot out there but they range from hundreds to thousands for anything worthwhile.

For real photography this setup kinda sucks but I don't think you will get a real lens for long range without spending thousands of dollars. It is fun to play with. I actually like the iPhone set up better because multiple people can view it at the same time.

I bought my spotting scope in 1965 Thieves Alley Yokosuka Japan, I'd have to go out and look to see who made it, it's the old type the has the four eye pieces on the turret you just turn it to select what magnification you want. It's crystal clear I can see .17 holes at 100 yards without problems. Made in Japan when everything was cheap still gets it done.

I bought my spotting scope in 1965 Thieves Alley Yokosuka Japan, I'd have to go out and look to see who made it, it's the old type the has the four eye pieces on the turret you just turn it to select what magnification you want. It's crystal clear I can see .17 holes at 100 yards without problems. Made in Japan when everything was cheap still gets it done.

Don't waste your time trying out the NCstar, Barska, Yukon, Harbor Freight, UTG, Leapers or any of the other garbage optics. I started out with a Barska and I literally couldn't resolve a .223 hole at 100 yards on a non shoot-n-see target. It was so bad I just sold it. I went to a Redfield Rampage 20-60x60 and it was a big step up, but still wasn't all that great. I switched that awhile back to a Vortex Nomad, and I trust it out to about 350 yards or so, maybe 400. I can easily spot .22 holes on paper at 200 yards with this one and that is all I really need it for. It works really well for what I need, and didn't cost an arm and a leg. If I were to get a good one, I would probably look to a Kowa angled scope, a Vortex Viper HD, or Pentax PF-80ed or similar. There are a lot out there but they range from hundreds to thousands for anything worthwhile.

Ordered the same Redfield you had. I think I'll be happy if I can see 22 at 100 yards. Our range does have great scopes to share, but I'd like my own for 50 and 100 yard shots.