News
last week brought the startling, if not shocking, announcement that the
American government has been providing the Mexican government with the
location of citizen groups and citizen volunteers acting as extra eyes
and ears to the American Border Patrol. The shock to many is that the
American government would do such a thing, putting the lives of innocent
Americans in jeopardy.

Then
came the no less shocking news that Mexican consulate officials were provided
office space in the Tucson offices of the U.S. Border Patrol in February,
2006, and are being allowed to dictate Border Patrol agent’s activities.
At least one agent resigned in protest.

And,
of course, as is usual when the government gets caught engaging in unethical
(or treasonous) activities, its standard operating procedure (SOP) is
to deny, deny, deny. However, information that has only been given to
the government by the citizen groups helping patrol the border, and citizen
groups acting in other parts of the United States to curb illegal alien
activity, has ended up in the hands of the Mexican government and found
its way to a Mexican
government website. This is information that goes far beyond the requirements
of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963, requiring that
government detained foreign nationals be given access to their consulate.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to deduce that it was the United States
government who supplied the Mexican government with that information.

Let’s
be clear here. We are not talking about immigration — people obtaining
the required documents and entering the United States legally; we are
talking about illegal aliens, foreign nationals entering the United States
at other than legal border checkpoints and without the required identification
or documents. And let’s be very clear on what this represents. Twelve
to 20 million illegal aliens residing within the borders of the United
States constitutes an illegal invasion. When the majority of those illegal
aliens come from one country, said illegal invasion becomes an act of
aggression; in fact, an act of war. That country is Mexico.

Article
III, § 3, Constitution, United States of America: “Treason, proof and
punishment. Treason against the United States, shall consist only
in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them
aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the
testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in
open court.

The
congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no
attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except
during the life of the person attainted.”

In providing
a foreign nation (Mexico) information deleterious to the health and safety
of American citizens, those responsible have committed an act of treason
in “adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort” when the enemy
is levying war against America.

Who
is ultimately responsible for this act of treason?

Twice
in the last month, Americans have been witness to the orchestrated demonstrations
of illegal aliens in major American cities. On May 1, 2006, the intent
was to show Americans how much economic damage the illegal aliens, the
foreign aggressors, could do in our country by not showing up for work.
Sympathetic employers and businesses closed their doors that day in a
show of support for these illegal invaders.

But
the effort fell flat as the economic impact wasn’t even a blip on the
radar screen of American commerce. The effect was however, a more than
adequate demonstration to the American people of the sheer numbers of
illegal aliens being allowed to live without fear of deportation in the
United States while they take jobs from the people of the United States
who need them. In turn, the money being made by these illegal invaders
is being sent out of the United States to Mexico while American taxpayers
foot the medical and welfare bills of the illegal aliens, and while the
companies employing the illegal aliens pocket the profit from not paying
taxes or benefits, paying lower wages but maintaining comparable market
price.

And
while these illegal invaders blocked streets, caused congestion, and cost
American taxpayers the overtime and extra police needed to monitor their
illegal activities, not one illegal was deported as required by law. And
with the exception of possibly the Honorable Representative Ron Paul (Texas)
and the Honorable Representative Tom Tancredo (Colorado), not one United
States Senator or Representative had the gumption to stand up and demand
these illegal invaders be rounded up and deported.

Some
explanation of why this did not occur can be found in an article
written by Melissa Sattly on August 19, 2001 and published in the
Brownsville Herald. In the article a Mexican citizen and former
government official is quoted as stating, “In Mexico, Bush is viewed as
a friend because he is making changes in the United States to open borders,
fight the trucking issue and promote immigration reform.”

The
article has other telling statements to make, “Immigration is another
hot topic of dialogue between Fox and Bush. In past speeches the Mexican
president has advocated an open border policy and amnesty for more than
3 million Mexicans living illegally in the United States.

Bush
has proposed granting the amnesty and supports a guest worker program,
sponsored by Republican Sen. Phil Gramm of Texas, that would offer limited
work permits to Mexicans working certain jobs in the United States.”

The
article also allows as how while governor of Guanajuato, Mexico, Fox “saw
firsthand the powerful draw of jobs north of the border.”

All
of this according to the passions, prejudices and opinions of President
George W Bush in complete indifference to the law that requires illegal
aliens to be deported to their nation of origin. We are a constitutional
republic, not a democracy in which the passions, opinions and prejudices
of the majority are visited upon the minority in an act of oppression;
constitutional republic vs democracy; rule of law vs passions, opinions
and prejudices.

America
was established on the rule of law, not as a democracy. The law says these
illegal invaders must be deported. It is the responsibility of our elected
representatives in Washington DC to see that they are deported. The cost
to American taxpayers in wages, benefits, crime, medical, schooling and
welfare has and will continue to far exceed the cost of deportation.

But
in his total disregard for the law in pursuit of his passions, opinions
and prejudices, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out why President
George W Bush has done nothing about the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens
now residing in the United States; 9 to 17 million more than was estimated
in 2001. Further, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that
the actions of government employees under his leadership is a direct reflection
of his policies; in this instance, providing information deleterious to
the health and safety of American citizens to the Mexican government due
to Bush and Fox being of one accord regarding the illegal invasion of
America by citizens of Mexico.

That
the United States government is supplying information to a foreign government
deleterious to the lives and safety of American citizens is an act of
treason. It is also an impeachable offense that President George W Bush
has and is allowing this to happen. It becomes apparent that his allegiance
to Fox and the nation of Mexico is greater than his allegiance to the
United States of America which is also an impeachable offense.

And
then, of course, there is that ever-present fact that if GW was serious
about stopping terrorism, he would secure our southern border and stop
the illegal invasion. It becomes very obvious that the War on Terror is
not about terrorism but about control and oppression of the American people.

Along
this same line, Title IV of Public Law 107-56, the U.S. Patriot Act, is
entitled “Protecting the Border”. Subtitle A of Title IV addresses the
northern border (with Canada); there is no provision for protecting the
southern border. Now one would assume, given the greater potential for
terrorists to cross the southern border, that this section would make
provision for that probability, and if GW was serious about protecting
the United States of America from terrorists, the Patriot Act would carry
such a provision. That it doesn’t makes it apparent that GW wants that
border left open to terrorists and further, that the Patriot Act is about
controlling Americans, not stopping terrorism.

Former
impeached president William Jefferson Clinton desecrated the Oval Office
by playing around with Monica Lewinsky. Is illegal spying on the American
people any different? Is lying to the American people any different? Is
invading Iraq under a false flag any different? Is initiating the phony
War on Terror under a false flag any different? Is exerting undue influence
on a supposedly independent commission investigating 9/11 any different?
Is illegally databasing millions of telephone records from AT&T, Verizon
and BellSouth any different? Is committing acts of treason any different?

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

In short,
President George Walker Bush is no better than William Jefferson Clinton
was. To claim Clinton was wrong because he is a Democrat but Bush is right
because he is a Republican is the epitome of hypocrisy. Republican or
Democrat, right is right, wrong is wrong, and treason is treason.

George
Walker Bush deserves to be, and should be, impeached. For providing the
Mexican government with information deleterious to the health and safety
of American citizens, he should be charged with treason.

Mother and wife, Stuter has spent the past ten
years researching systems theory with a particular emphasis on education.
She home schooled two daughters, now grown and on their own. She has worked
with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems
governance and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers
and citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation. She has
traveled the United States and lived overseas.

In
short, President George Walker Bush is no better than William Jefferson
Clinton was. To claim Clinton was wrong because he is a Democrat but Bush
is right because he is a Republican is the epitome of hypocrisy. Republican
or Democrat, right is right, wrong is wrong, and treason is treason.