This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Whereas defined pursuant to: The Alien Registration Act of 1940, usually called the Smith Act because the anti-sedition section was authored by Representative Howard W. Smith of Virginia, was adopted at 54 Statutes at Large 670-671 (1940). The Act has been amended several times and can now be found at 18 U.S. Code § 2385 (2000). § 2385. Advocating Overthrow of Government;

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof-- Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

Whereas defined pursuant to: Officers and employees acting as agents of foreign principal 18 USC § 219 (a) Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both. (b) Nothing in this section shall apply to the employment of any agent of a foreign principal as a special Government employee in any case in which the head of the employing agency certifies that such employment is required in the national interest. A copy of any certification under this paragraph shall be forwarded by the head of such agency to the Attorney General who shall cause the same to be filed with the registration statement and other documents filed by such agent, and made available for public inspection in accordance with section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (22 USCS § 616], as amended. (c) For the purpose of this section "public official" means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after he has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency, or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government.

To Jim: What you said here isn't anything short of a cop out to slander what this Bar Attorney said and take the sting out of it because he has sworn his allegiance to Britain is somehow supposed to downplay the truth he said about the NDA because your feelings got hurt. I've have yet to see anybody shoot down any of the points that was maid by this Attorney. Don't try to us his bar' status against him, go head to head with him and debate who makes more sense pertaining to what an NDA is supposed to be. Because if someone paid him to write that response obviously you get what you pay for right? Because I have a couple of friends in the gaming industry who had to sign an NDA because of the software being used to create the game. Here is why NDA's is used in the game industry:

The non-disclosure agreement, as it relates to video game software, exists primarily for marketing purposes, and it's largely about keeping the details of a product under wraps until the fan fires are burning their brightest. This mock-secrecy wouldn't be so bad if, at the same time, game companies weren't bending over backwards to hype the products that they don't actually want you to know about. End Quote.

So why is everyone treating this NDA like the boogeyman? When it is used in other industries to protect a product long enough so leaks won't get out and destroy the official unveiling of something and loose loads of money because of it, so they install an NDA to protect future profits. It's no different then a party being thrown for someone and to keep it a surprise everyone agrees to not say something right? But if you do tell the person who the party is being thrown for and the details of it, is it still a surprise party? I don't think so. That's where an NDA comes in, which last as long as the planning is taking to get it done and once the party is started the NDA is null and void which is why most of them don't come with any expiration date.

But the real reason why people are so up in arms about this (nda) is because naturally they want to let the world know they are wealthy because they asses got self esteem issues and want to be perceived a certain way and not looked at as the average Joe anymore. These will be the first people to go broke. Because once that spotlight is on them so many offers, investment ideas, charities, projects and brokers will come their way that the slick talk from these people will swindle there money everywhere but where they said it supposed to go. Basically making themselves targets. But to be real honest the NDA is not effective as it is portrayed to be anyway because if ou do break the NDA agreement and someone tries to take you to court because of it they have to prove what damage was done and did the suffer any quantifiable loss of money which would be very hard to do and likely won't succeed.

So all in all it's pointless because you really can't stop someone from saying anything unless the NDA come with some major stipulations and consequences of breaking it scares the shit out of them enough to honor and follow it until it's safe to speak about what the NDA is supposed to cover and protect..

To boil this NDA issue down to it's essence, aren't we all spending a little too much time being distracted by the "supposed" existence of thisNDA and what it means, when NO ONE to date has even seen a working (or draft) copy of it for us to dissect?

aside from anything else, most of his rebuttle made no sense as he was rebutting things out of context and twisting JDs original statements to mean other than what he said before rebutting his invented nonsense.

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.