The amendments to the Films Act bill has been passed in Parliament. State-ownedCNAwas the first off the blocks, calling it “a significant step to further liberalise and expand the space for political debate.” The Straits Times and others will likely to parrot the enthusiasm, and there will be no end to the Government hailing the amendments as a sign of Singapore opening up.

—WHAT IS REALLY ALLOWED (where previously banned)

This is the only part that fits the bill of liberalisation (but is negated later by more new restrictions).

The new amendment states that you can now make, exhibit and distribute videos composedwhollyof a political party’s ideologies and manifestos. But here’s the catch – the videos must be made “on the basis of which candidates authorised by the political party to stand will seek to be elected at a Parliamentary election.” Does this mean that someone like Dr Chee Soon Juan, who is ineligible to stand for elections due to his bankruptcy, is not allowed to appear in such videos? Will somethinglikethis be criminalized?

WHAT IS NOW NOT ALLOWED (where previously allowed, or not stated)

Get ready, here are the bombshells:

1. You are now not allowed to make an unbiased and non-partisan political video that contains any form of animation. Likethis.

2. You are now not allowed to make an unbiased and non-partisan political video that contains “wholly or substantially based on unscripted or “reality” type programmes.” Something likethis.

3. You are now not allowed to make an unbiased and non-partisan political video that depicts “events, persons or situations in a dramatic way.” Something likethis.

4. You are now not allowed to make an unbiased and non-partisan political video that contains scenes of an illegal political event. Something likethis.

“These amendments will allow much leeway for political parties and election candidates as well as individuals to produce party political films. At the same time, this will allow for political debate in Singapore to remain serious and robust.

“We should not prevent people from recording video clips of political events held in accordance with the law or from making factual documentary videos of political issues and events. But we must continue to have limits against undesirable political materials, for example, fictionalised accounts or political commercials, even though it may not be possible to enforce these limits completely.

“Films with animation and dramatisation and distort what is real or factual will be disallowed, as the intent of the amendments is to ensure that these films do not undermine the seriousness of political debate.”

Senior Minister of State for Information, Communications and the Arts, Lui Tuck Yew in Parliament, on amendments to the Films Act.

Find us on Facebook

Democracy is best served by having an informed and involved citizenry that has access to a wide range of sources of news and views and an open and vibrant environment in which to share and to debate ideas and opinions.