The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.

Larry Klayman, the plaintiffs counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obamas birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.

Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:

McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the short form and the long form birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.

While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish inadmissible and not worthy of belief, they also stated A county sheriff from Arizona is not an official source of anything in Alabama.

But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obamas long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. Its on page 33 in the document below.

Just one more reason for him to be walked from the office in an orange jump suit and then see some jail time but highly unlikely in both.

This is a fundamental point. If he was never qualified for office and attained it by fraud, then impeachment is not necessary. Numerous criminal complaints can be filed and enforced without the Executive and Constitutional shields.

Its funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.

Since his signature law is Obamacare, thatll be a big burden off Americas back, but considering his abysmal failures in most other legal endeavors, we probably wont have much else to overturn.

Win-win!

While I don't hold out much hope of it happening, if Obama were removed as ineligible, the biggest benefit would be the invalidation of his appointments on the Supreme Court. To paraphrase Howard Cosell - "Down goes Kagan! Down goes Sotomayor"

I still cannot understand why the birther movement didn't just skip all of this and cut to the chase: the laws of the United States, at the time of his birth, made Obama a citizen of the United Kingdom. Therefore, he is ineligible to be President. Period. Every court filing his side has made provides primi facie evidence of this. It is not in dispute. I just don't get it.

What a legacy this guy will have? A ruin of the world's best healthcare system, Arab Springs stocking up Jihadis with sarin and anthrax, Fast-n-furious on a global scale, RU-486 over the counter to little girls, state paid terrorists running willy-nilly with one branch of government battling the other to make a living off our taxes to keep them here, and 397 days of vacation................

The media has pulled off one of the greatest hoaxes on the public of all time. They legitimized and elected us a president who they groomed and coddled for six years in order to turn their programming into a Jerry Springer meets Mike Wallace telethon for the last four years of his term. Obama's only safe harbor from their relentless to come papercuts -n-salt party is to blow shit up, his preference being in the the lands of bible clingers and gun toters.

20
posted on 05/01/2013 8:28:35 AM PDT
by blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)

What is the graphic which only appears as a grayish square?
I am unable to enlarge it, to view it.
Simply put two birth certificates that are different, one is fake.
I thinks its funny that some people buy the race of the father as “African”, it should have been “Negro”.

22
posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:00 AM PDT
by svcw
(If you are dead when your heart stops, why aren't you alive when it starts.)

Bread and circuses. A bunch of distraction created to cloud the real issue.

Fact: All the people in Congress KNOW the truth. The CIA has files on everyone who runs for office.

Thus every person in Congress is complicit. Legally.

That is a problem.

So they do the show you see, drag it out with side issues that can be fought and claim it’s ‘settled science and old news” when anyone brings up the real issue...because most people don’t KNOW the real issue. Thus anyone with a clue is mocked and made to look like a ‘Truther”.

“Its funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.”

I hear you but given the current environment who would force such a constitutional crisis besides maybe a handful of House members? Unfortunately the bread and circuses would continue. Nothing would happen.

Having said that we should never give up and we should document the truth - whatever it is - and get it in the public record. Maybe someone someday may give a rip and be able to use it.

Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh, he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....

The longer we wait, the more it’ll hurt. With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed. Americans are tough, we’ll get through.

I do agree with you, however. No one has the spine to push this issue.

27
posted on 05/01/2013 8:34:31 AM PDT
by rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)

Patriots should never give up on this fight. Regardless if the fraud serves his whole four years, it’s the most stark example of how our ruling class is corrupt beyond redemption. They must be brought down.

Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh,he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....”

“With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed.”

Judges appointed by a usurper must be objected to in pre-trial phase. After the verdict or ruling, the De Facto Officer Doctrine kicks in to protect the Federal government from chaos and disruption.

Legislation signed into law by a usurper can be objected to individually if specific adverse action is applied to the individual. For example, the IRS assesses an individual taxpayer a tax for not obtaining and maintaining a healthcare insurance policy. The individual can object to the tax assessment on the basis the law was signed by a usurper and does not apply to them because they object to laws signed by the usurper. The law remains ineffect for everyone else, but the IRS cannot tax the individual who formally objects after an assessment.

37
posted on 05/01/2013 8:56:48 AM PDT
by SvenMagnussen
(1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)

Go to guidestar.org and sign up. Read the Judicial Watch IRS filings for a few years and you will figure out what the deal is with them.

The amazing thing is that they have always been a “NONPROFIT” which to me is a joke. I expect that Klayman’s latest outfit, Freedom Watch, is no different than JW. Lots of noise, lots of fundraising, lots of nothing...

-- there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed. --

The courts have a widget for that, called the "de facto officer doctrine." Nothing would be undone.

The people ought to boot the entirety of Congress out on its ear, for failing to discuss the ramifications of dual citizenship at birth, and noting that dual citizenship at birth can be synonymous with "natural born citizen" of the US. The reason the conversation didn't happen is that Congress is uncomfortable with that conversation, Congress knows that some fraction of the public would not agree with a finding that a dual citizen by birth and natural born citizen are the same thing, so it just flat out ignored the point.

The De Facto Officer Doctrine does apply to judicial rulings and verdicts from a judge appointed by a usurper unless there is an objection lodged pre-trial.

The Congress and the Court will not interfere with the people’s right to elect a usurper as their leader and Commander-in-Chief. But, an individual can object to adverse action taken against them for following or adhereing to a law signed by a usurper if they make their objection known before trial.

Obama supporters may not object to the Affordable Care and Protection Act signed by Obama. But those who do object, can opt out by objecting when adverse action is taken against them.

Elections have consquences. But, you can opt out if the leader is a usurper.

45
posted on 05/01/2013 9:26:26 AM PDT
by SvenMagnussen
(1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)

Is there a simple explanation for these differences? To me it looks like the different versions were taken on different security paper. If they were scanned from an original, then there should be minor difference between them. If they were scanned from a copy, they could be the same. One looks like it's a copy of copy which could easily explain the edge difference.

Multiple images that look the same but with different attributes, actually give weight to verity of the COLB and the fact that there is a real "mother" document. If so, where is it?

As for the layers, what's missing is the voice of the expert. Or maybe the voice is there, but it's lost in the noise. This would take deep technical knowledge and experience. For example, I have deep knowledge of one of the Office applications, and know things about it that are difficult to explain to casual users. With this background, to me the layers in themselves aren't evidence of anything. In fact, if 2 of the images have massively different layers, it would seem to be that they were scanned by different devices or used different applications. If only one layer is different, that would seem to be an electronic modification. A lot of the excitement may be from people who don't understand how scanning works. Since I don't know, and have the voice of someone who really does, I have to without judgment.

Of course, with so much related to BO being a lie and hot air, there's a real tendency to expect everything is that way. There's so much in his background that disqualifies him, but the liberals and blacks want him. People have stopped praying enough and BO is the consequence of a largely backslidden nation.

To borrow a quote from Obama's long time friend, Bill Ayers: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird."

Justice will be done. Hopefully soon.

Just a personal thought on the subject. Obama would sell us out and see America destroyed before he would give up the Presidency. (Oh wait, he's almost there now.)

From the article:

"All of this is going to make certain people a little uneasy who think this is just a birther issue. Its not. Its a criminal issue. Its a national security issue. My fellow Americans, the Democrats are telling on themselves left and right. They are openly lying to you about the man in the Oval Office and everyone thinks there is something more important? I dont think so. Yes Benghazi is important. Yes, Fast and Furious is important. However, it appears that for the first time we have a man in the White House that we cannot really say is even from this country and apparently there is some serious felonies taking place in attempts to cover up what should be the biggest story covered in America and that is to expose a usurper to the office of President of the United States.

In case you are still thinking this doesnt matter, might I suggest you consider how this would impact things, versus impeachment for Benghazi or Fast and Furious? Understand that this would potentially nullify every law he has signed, every executive order he has given, and every Supreme Court appointment he has made. While many are saying that Benghazi is bigger than Watergate, and it most definitely is, the Obama eligibility issue is bigger than all Obamas scandals, in my opinion, because of the tentacles around things that it affects."

47
posted on 05/01/2013 9:29:03 AM PDT
by Perseverando
(The truth is hate to those who hate the truth.)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.