I kinda liked seeing someone on 'Reality tv' being called out as fake, but I also believe she could be more 'for real' than Joe's giving her credit for..but then that goes into a whole existential hip culture questioning.

Anyway! Watched last night, glad it's back, have a few favorites already, and bummed I won't be home tonight to watch the 2nd half.

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:51 amPosts: 8120Location: United States of New England

i didnt really question whether or not Monte was fake. i guess i just bought it. and i kinda liked her. i thought she was quirky. but real quirky not "i wanna be on tv quirky"maybe im a sucker.

i also liked the 7ft bball player.i was sad they didnt let the girl from Zimbabwe in. i thought it was rude of Gordon to say putting peanut butter in kale was wrong after she explained the cultural background of it. he was like "oh yeah i get it but that's not Master Chef" ummm...ok????

i liked the blind woman's story and i was also close to crying but i dont think she will last long. i think since she will be judged like everyone else she will have a hard time keeping up time-wise since she has to feel around for everything.i did think she was still awesome though. i mean dang. i cant imagine cooking without being able to see. i wouldnt even try.

i liked the blind woman's story and i was also close to crying but i dont think she will last long. i think since she will be judged like everyone else she will have a hard time keeping up time-wise since she has to feel around for everything.i did think she was still awesome though. i mean dang. i cant imagine cooking without being able to see. i wouldnt even try.

i question if she is COMPLETELY blind- she said she was LEGALLY blind, so i'm wondering if she has even a tiny bit of vision, not trying to call her out for lying or something like that, i was just wondering if she could even see a little bit since she said she'd been losing it for ten years.

There is so much time spent on the drama of the tasting and the chefs' reactions, and not nearly enough time showing the food and the tasting/criticizing of the food. I don't need to see Joe give that stupid stare any more - I want to know what everyone cooked, why and what it tastes like. It's annoying seeing the neglected cooks standing there like lumps.

There is so much time spent on the drama of the tasting and the chefs' reactions, and not nearly enough time showing the food and the tasting/criticizing of the food. I don't need to see Joe give that stupid stare any more - I want to know what everyone cooked, why and what it tastes like. It's annoying seeing the neglected cooks standing there like lumps.

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:51 amPosts: 8120Location: United States of New England

Arisaig wrote:

There is so much time spent on the drama of the tasting and the chefs' reactions, and not nearly enough time showing the food and the tasting/criticizing of the food. I don't need to see Joe give that stupid stare any more - I want to know what everyone cooked, why and what it tastes like. It's annoying seeing the neglected cooks standing there like lumps.

totally agree.enough wtih the Joe stank eye! i wanna see what dish every one made and i want the judges to taste it and tell us what it tastes like!

I can understand not wanting to double the work (look how it bit the American food truck folks in the asparagus), but it'd be nice if somebody did something veg-friendly at some point. And by that I mean forking vegan.