What is Trump Derangement Syndrome?

It’s quite obvious that left-leaning people in the United States are hyper-critical of President Donald Trump–and there’s a term used by his supporters to describe it: Trump Derangement Syndrome.

It’s not an affliction you’ll find in any medical textbook. A quick scan of the right-wing corners of the internet shows that the term is used to describe liberal outbursts throughout Trump’s presidency.

It’s made it’s way all the way up to Trump himself, who tweeted about people upset with his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The president even gave the term some legitimacy earlier this week when he retweeted Larry Elder, a conservative radio host, who used the #TrumpDerangementSyndrome hashtag when retweeting a story about a reporter who resigned after claiming the Capital Gazette shooter wore a “Make America Great Again” hat.

“BEWARE! #TrumpDerangementSyndrome can be career ending,” Elder wrote, drawing a retweet from Trump.

Trump Derangement Syndrome symptoms

Justin Raimondo, a conservative writer, wrote an op-ed about TDS for the Los Angeles Times. He surmised that Trump Derangement Syndrome symptoms come in three stages:

Losing a sense of proportion

Hyperbolic vocabulary use

A distorted view of reality

As Raimondo described it, people who “suffer” from Trump Derangement Syndrome overreact to Trump’s tweets and statements. They soon begin using heightened language and hyperbole to describe the president. Ultimately, they debase and can’t “distinguish fantasy from reality.”

“Opinion is unmoored from fact. Life resembles a dark fairy tale in which the villain—Trump—is an amalgam of all the worst tyrants in history, past and present, while the heroes–Trump’s critics–are akin to the resistance fighters of World War II,” Raimondo wrote.

Who talks about Trump Derangement Syndrome?

The idea has become popular on many pro-Trump corners of the internet. r/The_Donald, the unabashedly Trump supportive community on Reddit, routinely uses the term to discuss liberal reactions to the president.

One post, from late April, used a tweet from the @Education4Libs twitter who said it “speaks major volumes” that Democrats were less willing to negotiate with Trump than North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.

The conclusion, according to the r/The_Donald user? “Trump derangement syndrome is very real!”

The subreddit is litteredwithinstances of users posting anti-Trump comments from liberals. Commenters claim they are another instance of the syndrome.

Does Trump Derangement Syndrome Matter?

Does the idea that liberals are disgusted with Trump even matter? Is it that strange for an opposing party to have visceral distaste for a president who doesn’t represent their values?

According to some writers—it could.

In an op-ed for Real Clear Politics, Michael Barone argues that the constant barrage of negativity lobbed against Trump by the left could help his poll numbers rather than drop them.

“Looking ahead, it’s possible that Republicans in 2018 and Donald Trump in 2020 could win based on solid achievements,” Barone writes. “But their chances will be aided if Democrats can’t shake off their bad case of Trump derangement syndrome.”

Similarly, an op-ed on Fox News argued that liberal opposition to the president only increases the support of Trump’s most ardent base.

“How do liberals think that 20 percent of reluctant Trump voters respond to these displays of unbridled contempt? They are outraged not at Trump but at his critics. The unhinged hatred for the president makes these voters almost reflexively defend him,” Marc Thiessen writes.

Is Trump Derangement Syndrome real?

All of these hypothetical scenarios may have some truth to them. However, others argue that Trump Derangement Syndrome is nothing more than a conservative attempt to dismiss real concerns of the American population.

As a 2017 Salon article points out, much of the same hysteria Trump supporters say is nothing compared to the conspiracy theories and rhetoric used by conservatives to describe former President Barack Obama.

Regardless of the ultimate consequences–or lack thereof—of the fake syndrome, it won’t stop a large contingent of voters who disagree with the president and his policies from voicing their displeasure.

Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).