Comments on Little noteTypePad2013-11-20T03:26:20ZEric Zornhttp://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/tag:typepad.com,2003:http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2013/11/little-note/comments/atom.xml/Barry3 commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b016876d9970b2013-11-21T03:04:11Z2013-11-21T03:04:13ZBarry3http://profile.typepad.com/6p019b007110a6970dIt is reported that Everett went over to Lincoln and wished he could have communicated as much as Lincoln did...<p>It is reported that Everett went over to Lincoln and wished he could have communicated as much as Lincoln did in a few minutes that he did in 2 hours. There&#39;s a lot to be said about brevity.</p>Bruce L. commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b0163f8ff970d2013-11-20T16:31:33Z2013-11-20T16:31:33ZBruce L.Four score and seventy years ago a President made a short speech that imbued a long reminiscence... Funny that EZ...<p>Four score and seventy years ago a President made a short speech that imbued a long reminiscence...</p>
<p>Funny that EZ brings this up though, because not all the reports of the day a century and a half ago were so glowing either... In fact, this editorial from the week after the speech was just retracted... The Patriot-News of Harrisburg says it regrets missing the &quot;momentous importance, timeless eloquence and lasting significance.&quot;</p>
<p>Interesting that they said &quot;We pass over the silly remarks of the President. For the credit of the nation we are willing that the veil of oblivion shall be dropped over them and that they shall be no more repeated or thought of.&quot;</p>
<p>Well, I guess they got that one wrong, huh? </p>
<p>Here is the original editorial, in its entirety:<br />
----------------------------</p>
<p> Patriot &amp; Union<br />
Tuesday, Nov. 24, 1863 Editorial</p>
<p>A Voice from the Dead <br />
We have read the oration of Mr. Everett. We have read the little speeches of President Lincoln, as reported for and published in his party press, and we have read the remarks of the Hon. Secretary of State, Wm. H. Seward, all delivered on the occasion of dedicating the National Cemetery, a plot of ground set apart for the burial of the dead who fell at Gettysburg in the memorable strife which occurred there between the forces of the Federal Government and the troops of the Confederacy of seceded States. To say of Mr. Everett&#39;s oration that it rose to the height which the occasion demanded, or to say of the President&#39;s remarks that they fell below our expectations, would be alike false. Neither the orator nor the jester surprised or deceived us. Whatever may be Mr. Everett&#39;s failings he does not lack sense - whatever may be the President&#39;s virtues, he does not possess sense. Mr. Everett failed as an orator, because the occasion was a mockery, and he knew it, and the President succeeded, because he acted naturally, without sense and without constraint, in a panorama which was gotten up more for his benefit and the benefit of his party than for the glory of the nation and the honor of the dead. We can readily conceive that the thousands who went there went as mourners, to view the burial place of their dead, to consecrate, so far as human agency could, the ground in which the slain heroes of the nation, standing in relationship to them of fathers, husbands, brothers, or connected by even remoter ties of marriage or consanguinity, were to be interred. To them the occasion was solemn; with them the motive was honest, earnest and honorable. But how was it with the chief actors in the pageant, who had no dead buried, or to be buried there; from none of whose loins had sprung a solitary hero, living or dead, of this war which was begotten of their fanaticism and has been ruled by their whims? They stood there, upon that ground, not with hearts stricken with grief or elated by ideas of true glory, but coldly calculating the political advantages which might be derived from the solemn ceremonies of the dedication. We will not include in this category of heartless men the orator of the day; but evidently he was paralyzed by the knowledge that he was surrounded by unfeeling, mercenary men, ready to sacrifice their country and the liberties of their countrymen for the base purpose of retaining power and accumulating wealth. His oration was therefore cold, insipid, unworthy the occasion and the man. We pass over the silly remarks of the President. For the credit of the nation we are willing that the veil of oblivion shall be dropped over them and that they shall be no more repeated or thought of. But the Secretary of State is a man of note. He it was who first fulminated the doctrine of the irrepressible conflict; and on the battle field and burial ground of Gettysburg he did not hesitate to re-open the bleeding wound, and proclaim anew the fearful doctrine that we are fighting all these bloody battles, which have drenched our land in gore, to upset the Constitution, emancipate the negro and bind the white man in the chains of despotism. On that ground which should have been sacred from the pollution of politics, even the highest magnate in the land, next to the President himself, did not hesitate to proclaim the political policy and fixed purpose of the administration; a policy which if adhered to will require more ground than Gettysburg to hold our dead, and which must end in the ruin of the nation. The dead of Gettysburg will speak from their tombs; they will raise their voices against this great wickedness and implore our rulers to discard from their councils the folly which is destroying us, and return to the wise doctrines of the Fathers, to the pleadings of Christianity, to the compromises of the Constitution, which can alone save us. Let our rulers hearken to the dead, if they will not to the living - for from every tomb which covers a dead soldier, if they listen attentively they will hear a solemn sound invoking them to renounce partisanship for patriotism, and to save the country from the misery and desolation which, under their present policy, is inevitable.</p>David P. Graf commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b0163dbc6970d2013-11-20T16:19:21Z2013-11-20T16:19:21ZDavid P. GrafJerry B., I don't recall the controversy at all. However, I had no luck getting hold of any living person...<p>Jerry B.,</p>
<p>I don&#39;t recall the controversy at all. However, I had no luck getting hold of any living person at the museum to confirm/deny the story. The calls went to voicemail and I have other things to take care of today.</p>Pan commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b01633ec7970b2013-11-20T16:06:16Z2013-11-20T16:06:16ZPanThe Post probably would have been leading the call for New York to join the Confederacy.<p>The Post probably would have been leading the call for New York to join the Confederacy.</p> JerryB commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b0161ddd8970c2013-11-20T14:19:34Z2013-11-20T14:19:34Z JerryBGraf: Thanks. Maybe they changed it back still again to the original words. But I believe this was a controversy...<p>Graf:</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Maybe they changed it back still again to the original words. But I believe this was a controversy when the museum just opened.</p>David P. Graf commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b0162390d970b2013-11-20T14:14:46Z2013-11-20T14:14:46ZDavid P. Graf--I will call up the Abraham Lincoln Museum when it opens in about a hour. We'll find out for sure...<p>--I will call up the Abraham Lincoln Museum when it opens in about a hour. We&#39;ll find out for sure if they&#39;ve made that change to the Gettysburg Address. I bet this is a hoax.</p> JerryB commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b015e6e7f970d2013-11-20T05:53:42Z2013-11-20T05:53:42Z JerryBI can not find a link. If someone has access to the Tribune Archives please look it up.<p>I can not find a link. If someone has access to the Tribune Archives please look it up.</p>Jon B. commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b015d5b3d970c2013-11-20T05:26:39Z2013-11-20T05:26:39ZJon B.Sure you're not thinking of this, Jerry? "In Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, depicted on the north wall of the memorial,...<p>Sure you&#39;re not thinking of this, Jerry?</p>
<p>&quot;In Lincoln&#39;s Second Inaugural Address, depicted on the north wall of the memorial, an engraver inadvertently carved a letter “E” where he meant to carve an “F.” This error was corrected by filling in a portion of the carving to revert it to an &quot;F.&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nps.gov/linc/historyculture/lincoln-memorial-myths.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nps.gov/linc/historyculture/lincoln-memorial-myths.htm</a></p>j meehan commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b015d2a8b970c2013-11-20T05:02:58Z2013-11-20T05:02:58Zj meehanDienne Hard to say it, but the ineffable one is correct (trusting my memory).<p>Dienne</p>
<p>Hard to say it, but the ineffable one is correct (trusting my memory).</p>Dienne commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b015d1c05970c2013-11-20T04:56:49Z2013-11-20T04:56:49ZDienne"I do see that the president found time today to address the Wall Street Journal CEO Council, however." Please note...<p>&quot;I do see that the president found time today to address the Wall Street Journal CEO Council, however.&quot;</p>
<p>Please note that next time someone calls Obama a &quot;socialist&quot;.</p>
<p>Jerry - sorry, your memory isn&#39;t trustworthy. Please find a source.</p> JerryB commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b015ddb68970d2013-11-20T04:44:50Z2013-11-20T04:44:50Z JerryBI am doing this from memory. I remember that they had to change the words of the Gettysburg Address in...<p>I am doing this from memory. I remember that they had to change the words of the Gettysburg Address in an exhibit in the Lincoln Museum in Springfield.</p>
<p>They eliminated the words -- &quot;four score&quot; because it would confront school children with something they were not familiar with.</p>
<p>And I infer -- thereby challenging them and lowering their self-esteem.</p>roadgeek commented on 'Little note'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d83451b4ba69e2019b015d2206970b2013-11-20T04:09:13Z2013-11-20T04:09:13ZroadgeekI note with keen interest that President Obama didn't attend the sesquicentennial, despite the fact that he professes great admiration...<p>I note with keen interest that President Obama didn&#39;t attend the sesquicentennial, despite the fact that he professes great admiration for Abraham Lincoln. I wonder why not? Twenty-four other presidents have visited Gettysburg, including Kennedy, who gave a speech in 1963.</p>
<p>I do see that the president found time today to address the Wall Street Journal CEO Council, however. Good to have priorities.</p>