I am a photographer from East Hertfordshire/Essex/London. I started this blog to share some of my photography ideas and thinking. This blog is a mixture of my photography, thinking behind some photo shoots and some equipment reviews. The reviews are just my user experience and nothing more. My passion is portraits, editorial and fashion photography.
If you have any project that need a photographer, please get in touch. My website is at www.yattang.net

Links

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

This lens was part of a large consignment of old photographic equipment I was given. It belongs to the father of a coworker who no longer wants them. As a Canon shooter I already has the Canon 50mm f1.8 so never shot with it. However, I recently purchased a new Olympus OMD EM10. With it's focus peaking and 3-axis in body stablisation it is the ideal camera to test it out. With the lens fitted with an adapter here are some images from an afternoon shooting on the street of London.

Yashinon DX 50mm f1.7 mounted to Olympus OMD EM10

It is possible to get some good bokeh from this lens shooting wide open. The EVF on the EM10 manual focusing was easy even without peaking. The main draw back was in fact my camera. Even with ISO set to 100, on a bright sunny day, I had to stop down to f2.8 to avoid over exposure.

Of course I have no real reason to shoot with this lens at all. I own the Olympus 45mm f1.8, a small light weight sharp lens. How ever, I just like the feel of the Yashinon lens. The focus ring was smooth, well damped and a joy to use. Here are a few photos shot with this lens.

After checking the photos closely, I can say it is not as sharp as the Olympus 45mm f1.8. The Yashinon lens is a fun lens to use and manual focus was a lot easier to use using peaking function. The focus ring was very smooth and lovely to use and good quality photos can be achieved. If you can get one at a good price then go for it but it is not up to the level of the native MFT portrait lens. If auto focus is not important to you, adapted lens can be used to supplement native lenses.

Sunday, June 7, 2015

This lens can be had for very little money on eBay. That was where I picked up this lens complete
with original screw on hood. Using a M42
to EOS adapter, I tested this lens on a Canon EOS 6D and EOS 650D. On the 650D, the angle of view is similar to 216mm. A 216mm f3.5 lens sounds attractive.

First of all, lets’ talk about the lens itself. It has an aperture ring and is manual focus
only. It is all metal construction and
is well built. The focus ring is smooth
with plenty of rotation required between infinity and minimum focus
distance. The long focus movement is a
useful feature to aid focus accuracy. I
did not find it difficult to focusing in good light if the subject is not
moving. If the subject is moving, that
is totally different experience. This
lens has an Auto or Manual switch near the base. This refers to the aperture control. In Auto, the pin at the back of the lens is
pressed and the aperture ring stops down.
When using an adapter, it can only be used in Manual mode when you
manually change the aperture. It does
mean the view finder gets darker if you stop down. So, how does this lens do on a modern digital SLR? Quite well is my answer. For the cost it is amazing if you’re happy to
focus manually. You can achieve quite
blur background with this lens. Here are
a few photos taken with my EOS 650D at f3.5.
The bokeh blur is quite respectable and a lot better than any kit lens
can. Here are a few photos taken with the
lens wide open at f3.5.

f3.5 with Canon EOS 650D

f3.5 with Canon EOS 650D

f3.5 with Canon EOS 650D

This lens is reasonable good in resisting flare. I shot the image below at f3.5 into the tree
with the sun on the corner. It does not
do too badly. On the same image, you can
also see the level of chromatic aberration.
It is an extremely high contrast situation and it shows. This is likely to be as bad as it can
be. You will need to shoot raw and post process
if you want to avoid this.

Flare resistance not too bad

Not too much chromatic aberration for a high contrast situation

One thing I’ve noticed is when stopped down, the camera over
expose the same scene. Here is an
example of what I mean. The following
three images were taken at f3.5, f5.6 and f8.
The metering mode was centre weighted.
The scene is over exposed progressively worse from f3.5 to f8. I did not try different metering mode, but it
may be important to you if you shoot jpeg and will need to dial in exposure
compensation if you stop down. For me,
it will not be a big deal as I will most likely to shoot wide open with this
lens all the time.

f3.5 Canon EOS 650D

f5.6 Canon EOS 650D

f8 Canon EOS 650D

As a portrait lens it does quite well. The following photo were taken with Canon EOS 6D, a full frame camera.

f3.5 with Canon EOS 6D

f3.5 with Canon EOS 6D

f3.5 with Canon EOS 6D

Here are a few more photos taken on a bright sunny day in The City of London. All taken with Canon EOS 6D. I shot as much as possible at f3.5 unless it was too bright, but I need not keep records of what aperture I shot at.

In summary it is a good lens. It surpassed my expectation, if you don't mind manual focus. 135mm on a full frame camera is a great focal length for portraits. There is very little distortion and shallow depth of field can be achieved with smooth bokeh. Sharpness will not be up to the standard of modern lens but in a lot of cases, composition and content are more important than sharpness. Sharpness on its own can be over rated.