SAP Cost Allocation

Author Written by Bubai and last updated on Posted on December 9, 2017.

Advertisement

Welcome to the SAP cost allocation tutorial. In every organization, there are costs involved in various departments. In this tutorial, we will discuss how these costs can be allocated across different SAP cost objects like cost center or internal order and help to create a cost analysis report.

Let us look at a simple example on how cost allocation comes into effect and why it becomes the most integral part of controlling.

Advertisement

CSN Ltd operates as an IT equipment service center for reputed brands across the UK. This company deals with after-sales services including repair and refurbishment services for products like laptops, PC, LCD monitors, etc. CSN Ltd has a division in the UK comprising of departments like Management, Logistics, Warehouse, Service and Quality Control.

Each of the departments has its own mode of operation running daily which incurs significant amount of cost which can be attributed as Direct and also Indirect. CSN management has come out with a strategy on how these costs can be charged to each impacted cost center to come out with the most efficient costing report. This is where cost allocation planning comes to the picture where the company will consider impacted cost centers where costs will be allocated in related proportion. In the allocation planning, amount and quantities will be periodically determined and allocated from sender cost objects (like cost center) to receiver cost objects. In this case, we will be using CSN departments as primary cost centers which will act as both sender and receiver cost objects.

In this tutorial, we will try to understand different cost allocation methods in SAP which a successful organization can adapt in order to get clear insight about its cost accounting report.

Cost Allocation Cycle

Cost Allocation – Distribution

Cost Allocation – Assessment

Basics of SAP Cost Allocation

For a dynamic organization with complex operations where multiple projects / activities are running on daily basis adding up to the company’s profitability, accurate costing flow between related cost objects becomes one of the vital factor to look at when it comes to project based costing. SAP provides the most systematic foundation on how cost allocation process can contribute to the effecting reporting related to cost management.

Let’s take the scenario of CSN Ltd. The following image will give us a good idea on organizational structure of CSN.

Organizational Structure

In course of daily operation, various department as given above incur costs which are captured under related cost centers: CCGAM, CCWH, CCLOG, CCRC , CCSERV.

Advertisement

Cost Element Structure

In SAP Cost Allocation process, cost element plays the key role since costs flow from FI direct postings to related cost objects in Controlling. As we know, in Controlling there are two kinds of cost elements.

Secondary Cost Elements

These cost elements are maintained based on specific category, so that they can be used for reposting, cost assessment and revenues inside the CO.

CSN has also listed specific cost elements in a form of overheads which need to be used and allocated only within controlling area ‘CS00’ to related cost objects.

Secondary Cost Elements

In order to cater to the requirement of cost flow across the related cost objects (FI to CO or within CO), SAP has come out with unique methods of SAP cost allocation.

Advertisement

What is Cost Allocation in SAP?

Within cost center accounting and overhead cost controlling, allocations plays a vital role enabling the business users to periodically allocate amounts and quantities from sender cost objects to receiver cost objects based on cost center allocation planning and structure. Both actual and planning data can be allocated from sender cost object to receiver cost object in SAP cost allocation process using allocation cycle.

SAP Cost Allocation Methods

Taking the above scenario where primary cost elements and secondary cost elements are listed within a company and there is a requirement of correct cost evaluation from operation perspective, SAP recommends the following two types of Cost Allocation process:

Distribution – for Primary Cost Element

Assessment – for Secondary Cost Element

SAP Cost Allocation Method – Distribution

Distribution process is mainly used for allocating the amount and quantities (both plan and actual) of one or more sender cost objects to multiple receiver cost objects. Generally, in this type of SAP cost allocation, debit and credit of amount and quantities between sender cost objects (e.g., cost center) and receiver cost objects takes place under the original primary cost element, which means amount in the primary (original) cost element remains the same as before. Let’s consider the following scenario.

CSN has occupied building which is shared by its department as listed above in the structure. Monthly CSN’s building management incurs rental charges for the building which is stated as primary cost element and it needs to be allocated to various department (maintained as cost centers).

To address this requirement, SAP propose to define distribution process within the system since it is related to allocation of costs incurred within primary cost elements.

Advertisement

In SAP, there is customizing related to calculation of both actual and planning overhead rates. On the following screenshot, rates of overhead are related to planning. On the basis of these rates, overhead is allocated.

Define Plan Overhead Rates

In the following windows, there are multiple options to plan overhead rate.
Overhead – Initial Screen

For overhead cost allocation, there are three things we need to maintain as we are in the phase of planning:

Calculation Base: Cost Elements / Origin

Calculation Base: Cost Center / Activity Type

Percentage Overhead

The reason we choose the above options is because for all sorts of allocations methods, a calculation base is required both for cost elements and cost centers. We need percentage rate to be planned for related overheads on the basis of which cost allocation will be carried on.

Now, let’s go back to the scenario where we have to allocate building rental costs of CSN group. We need to first put the related cost element / cost center as the calculation base for CSN rental cost.

Under Receiver Tracing Factor tab, we specify cost element 400310 – Building Rent which needs to be allocated to the receiving cost centers. Finally, under Receiver Weighing Factor tab, we maintain the receiver cost center and the allotted percentage at which rent cost will be allocated as primary cost element.
Receiver Weighting Factors

After saving the segment, we can save the distribution cycle.

Execute Distribution Cycle (Transaction KSV5)

This activity is carried out during the period end closing. All distribution cycles are generally executed in order to fulfill the accomplishment of primary cost allocations like the above scenario where CSN rent cost is allocated to receiver cost centers CC-LOG, CC-WH, and CC-SERV based on the percentage allotted in the distribution cycle.
Transaction KSV5Transaction KSV5 – Initial Screen

Enter the following data in KSV5 transaction:

Period: 02 to 12 (Cost allocation will be performed according to the period stated in the distribution cycle)

Select distribution cycle within the validitiy period

Once executed the system will display the following screen (see below). The screen displays the cycle structure: sender cost center of CSN building rental.
Actual Distribution Sender List

The following screenshot tells how CSN building rental cost is allocated to receiver cost centers CC-LOG, CC-SERV, and CC-WH.
Actual Distribution Receiver List

SAP Cost Allocation Method – Assessment

In this method, internal SAP cost allocation is performed based on both primary and secondary cost elements. For example, during product costing we use assessment method to allocate the internal cost from a production cost center to a related production order.

This method is about grouping multiple cost elements and reclassifying them under a secondary cost element.

Process Prerequisites

Create assessment cost element (secondary) and specify receiver types for assessment where we can specify which table fields are active and whether a single value, an interval, or a group can be entered for these fields. You make these settings per controlling area and separately for plan and actual data respectively.

Allocation Structure

Process related to cost allocation via assessment usually requires predefined settings comprising of segment containing a source cost element being assigned to desired assessment cost elements. The whole setup gives the formation of the allocation structure which can be used during assessment cycle definition instead of an assessment cost element in the segment. Usage of allocation structure during assessment cycle setup is always optional and depends on the business scenario.

In SAP system, allocation structure is defined under the following path:

Define Allocation Structures in SPRO

New allocation structures can be created as demonstrated below where we will assign a source cost element and assessment cost element and save the settings.
Allocation Structures Configuration

Now, coming back to SAP cost allocation process with assessment method, where cost is allocated using the assessment cost element which generally wipes out the traceability of original cost element at the time when cost is getting allocated from a sender cost center to a receiver cost center. Finally, when the process completes, assessment of cost elements gets updated in both sender and receiver cost centers.

Next, you should assign the secondary cost element, specify sender rules and receiver tracing factor. In many cases, cost assessment can use the allocation structure instead which already consists of allocation rules of sender and receiver. In SAP, that is optional.
Allocation StructureSender Values and Receiver Tracing Factor

In Sender/Receiver tab, we also assign the sender and receiver values (preferably, cost centers and cost element).
Senders/Receivers

In the Receiver Tracing Factor tab, we provide the list of cost elements. In this example, we selected all cost elements related to administration expenses.
Cost Elements

Finally, in the Receiver Weighting Factors tab, we will input the percentage of cost allocation for the related cost receivers. Percentages are generally based on a client’s discretion considering how much indirect cost can be allocated between cost receivers (to each department).
Receiver Weighting Factors

After all the necessary settings, an assessment cycle is saved. Once the assessment cycle is in place, we can use the transaction code KSUB for execution of Plan/Actual assessment as per requirements. The process of execution is the same as for the transaction code KSV5 – Execute Distribution Cycle.
Transaction KSV5 – Initial ScreenActual Assessment Receiver List

The above screen shows how administration costs are allocated to related cost centers using assessment method of SAP cost allocation based on charging cost through secondary cost element as defined above.

—

Did you like this tutorial? Have any questions or comments? We would love to hear your feedback in the comments section below. It’d be a big help for us, and hopefully it’s something we can address for you in improvement of our free SAP CO tutorials.

5 thoughts on “SAP Cost Allocation”

Hello, One question, I don’t arrive to do the link between cost center receiver and cost element assessment for the method assessment cost allocation. I explain, for me in the last step, the screenshoot should show costs under cost assessment element define in the assessment plan? I am wrong ? Or I have miss one step for my understanding?

What is a purpose of cost center CS_CCH? because it appears nowhere, same for cost element assessment 9000003 Administration O/H

Dear Diomande,
During assessment he uses cost center group CS_CCH in receiver, it is nothing but the group created for cost centers CC-LOG, CC-SERV, CC-WH, i.e. you have both options either enter cost center range or enter cost center group. Cost Center group is a better option in my opinion because here you can create a group for selected cost centers only.

In assessment the cost will be captured on secondary cost element 9000003, see how: first the cost from multiple cost elements (400301 to 400310) that are defined as sender will be collected on the secondary cost element 9000003 (that is defined as receiver), Now cost for allocation among different cost centers (from sender CS-GAM to receiver CS_CCH) is collected under 9000003, and this will be allocated. When it is allocated, the information of original cost element is lost, because the cost is already collected on 9000003 and this secondary cost element will be used for allocation i.e. same will appear in Debit/credit entries.

On the 2nd half of your explanation, when you say the information of the original cost is lost, what i understand is that if i use Tcode S_ALR_87013611 to open cost center admin overhead, the debit part will show the value of cost elements 400301 to 400310 while the Credit part will show cost element 9000003 with the value collected from the multiple cost elements (400301 to 400310) instead of showing each cost element 400301 to 400310 is being credited. Is that correct ?

Could you clarify more on the difference between Assessment and Distribution Allocation? like can distribution do the same function as assessment and vice versa? and when we would want to use one but not the other ?

Without going into complexities, the primary difference between Assessment & Distribution are as follows:
1) Assessment is used when we do not required the original sender information i.e. fewer records e.g. all cost collected on 90000003 (can be from multiple cost centers) and then allocated to CS_CCH.

writing few record = better performance 🙂 (in general)

2) if you need sender information in doc. as well , you can use distribution

Another difference is distribution can allocate primary cost while the assessment can allocate both primary & secondary.

In the ERProof “SAP Cost Allocation” tutorial, in the “SAP Cost Allocation Method – Assessment” section it indicates that you want to move a cost from a production cost center to a related production order, but it appears later that it is actually moving the cost to a different cost center. Is it possible to allocate a cost from a cost center to a production order?

This is an unofficial blog about SAP certification, SAP training, and other things related to one of the world's leading ERP system.

This blog is independent and NOT affiliated with SAP SE (the company behind SAP ERP system).
Your usage of this website signifies your agreement with our terms and conditions. We would be happy to hear your feedback or questions.