Former Vice President Al Gore admitted that the latest report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was “torqued up” in order to spur governments to take political action to fight “global warming.”

“They are painting a much more alarming picture of what we face than we had previously known…” Woodruff pointed out to Gore in the video interview, according to The Climate Depot.

Admission of false global warming hype

The Democratic vice president-turned climate change expert did not appear apologetic about scaring the world’s population that its continued use of carbon-emitting fossil fuels will usher in the end of the world as we know it.

“The language that the IPCC used in presenting it was torqued up a little bit, appropriately – how [else] do they get the attention of policy-makers around the world?” Gore admitted to Woodruff, according to The Climate Depot.

Climate change skeptics say that the vice president’s latest admission goes to show that so-called scientists working under the global peacekeepers are more about science fiction than real science as they use their global warming alarmism to coax world governments into invest billions of dollars to fund an international green agenda.

“Gore’s admission that the UN IPCC report was ‘torqued up’ in order to ‘get the attention of policy-makers around the world’ is just the latest in a long line of evidence that the UN climate panel is nothing more than ‘a purely political body posing as a scientific institution,’” The Climate Depot’s Marc Morano reported.

Skeptism about UN climate agenda abounds

The UN’s deceptive global warming propaganda was a topic discussed in a new 2018 bestselling book criticizing climate change activism, where Prof. John Brignell – who served as a UN IPCC scientist – condemned the global agency for destroying science to promote the green agenda.

“The creation of the UN IPCC was a cataclysmic event in the history of science,” Brignell argued in The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change. “Here was a purely political body posing as a scientific institution, [and] through the power of patronage, it rapidly attracted acolytes. ‘Peer review’ soon rapidly evolved from the old-style refereeing to a much more sinister imposition of The Censorship.”

Another UN IPCC scientist who now rejects the UN climate panel, Kiminori Itoh – a Japanese award-winning environmental physical chemist – was also quick to point out the deceptive nature of the climate change agenda promoted throughout the world

“[Global warming fears are the] worst scientific scandal in the history,” Itoh declared, according to The Climate Depot. “When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”

In 2013, UN IPCC Chief Rajendra Pachauri also made a sobering admission about the panel.

“[The IPCC is an arm of world governments and serves at their] beck and call,” Pachauri told The Guardian at the time. “We are an intergovernmental body and we do what the governments of the world want us to do.”

Former UN Climate Chief Yvo de Boer alerted the world about his agency’s scare tactics a year before the UN released its climate change report.

“[The next IPCC report] is going to scare the wits out of everyone.” De Boer announced in 2012, according to The Climate Depot, “I’m confident those scientific findings will create new political momentum.”

A long line of climate lies …

Gore’s admission was eerily similar to what Dr. Steven Schneider – dubbed as “the late climate doomster” – said years ago about how to garner support for the global warming agenda.

“[A]s scientists, we are ethically bound to the scientific method, [but] on the other hand, we are not just scientists, but human beings as well,” Schneider proclaimed, according to Watts Up With That?“To do that we need to get some broad based support – to capture the public’s imagination – that, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So, we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts we might have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”

Nearly a decade ago, Gore made one of his baseless environmental claims, which, of course, never came to fruition.

“The entire north polar ice cap during some of the summer months could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years,” Gore warned in 2009, according to WND.

Gaining momentum with his history of unsubstantiated so-called scientific claims, Gore presented an illustration of ocean water spreading up to the 9/11 Memorial, and while making this prediction in an update to his famous global-warming film, An Inconvenient Truth, he showed video clips of Superstorm Sandy hitting the Eastern Seaboard.

“Ten years ago, when the movie, An Inconvenient Truth, came out, the single most criticized scene was an animated scene showing that the combination of sea-level rise and storm surge would put the ocean water into the 9/11 memorial site, which was then under construction, and people said, ‘That’s ridiculous,’” Gore stated in the movie’s updated version, according to WND. “What a terrible exaggeration.’”

True to form, Gore intentionally confused his moviegoers by manipulating his presentation to get the desired response – more converts to his climate change agenda.

Newsbusters shined some light onto the deceptive presentation used in the film, which showed sea water reaching the 9/11 memorial from news coverage of Superstorm Sandy .

“[The original prediction] was not about extenuating circumstances of a storm like Sandy slamming into New York or any ‘storm surge’ at all,” Newsbusters stressed, according to WND. “It was about the sea level rise that would be generated as (he predicted) ice melt in Greenland and Antarctica escalated dramatically.”

To draw in more climate change believers, Gore has ramped up his rhetoric.

“Now Gore has gone to new lengths to scare people with his global-warming agenda,” WND reported. “He’s likened it to slavery, the civil rights movement, the anti-apartheid movement and the nuclear arms race.”

He touched on these topics a couple years ago at the EcoCity 2017 World Summit in Melbourne, Australia.

“The abolition of slavery, woman’s suffrage and women’s rights, the civil rights movement and the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, the movement to stop the toxic phase of nuclear arms race and more recently the gay rights movement – all these movements have one thing in common,” Gore declared at the time, according to a July 2017 report by Climate Depot. “They were all met with ferocious resistance.”

He then used manipulative rhetoric to get Australians on board with his green agenda.

“Gore sang the praises of fossil fuels during his speech,” The Climate Depot reported on the event at the time. “‘Must we change? We have had tremendous benefits from our reliance on fossil fuels. Poverty has declined, living standards have increased and we still depend on them for more than 80 percent of world’s energy,’ Gore opened his talk stating. But then he again added, ‘Must we change?’”

He followed up by giving people from the Land Down Under his pep talk on what he believes Aussies must do.

“Gore’s answer was, ‘Yes – we must change,’ and he spent the remainder of his talk on showing the alleged negative impacts of carbon dioxide’s impact on the climate,” The Climate Depot report added. “Gore’s talk featured bad weather stills and videos from around the world from floods to typhoons to heat waves and wild fires and blamed them on rising CO2 emissions from fossil fuels.”

He continued by likening the effects of global warming to weapons of mass destruction.

“[The effect of global warming equals] 400,000 Hiroshima class atomic bombs exploding every 24 hours,” Gore claimed. “Overall, we are releasing CO2 into the atmosphere much faster than at any time in at least 66M years. Records beyond that are a bit less accessible after the dinosaurs were wiped out.”

Climate change skeptics in the world of science have rallied to inform the world about the mass deception of global warming.

In fact, more than 31,000 scientists signed on to a petition spearheaded by Linus Pauling Institute Co-founder Art Robinson. He co-founded it with Nobel Peace Prize recipient Linus Pauling and served there as president and research professor.

“[We agree that there is] no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will – in the foreseeable future – cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate,” The Petition Project document reads. “Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

Having served on the faculty of University of California-San Diego, where he earned his Ph.D., Robinson has much academic standing, having founded the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, and also having his son, Noah Robinson – who holds a PH.D. in Chemistry from Caltech – as a main signatory on his petition.