Humanity may be targeted by predatory Reptilian extraterrestrial species

Richard M. Dolan, a preeminent UFO historian whose book series on UFOs and the National Security State is characterized by rigorous empirical
and historical research, has affirmed the possible validity of the hypothesis advanced by researcher Laura Knight-Jadczyk that a non-physical
predatory Reptilian extraterrestrial species may be targeting humanity. Writing in a preface to Knight-Jadczyk’s new book High Strangeness:
Hyperdimensions and the Process of Alien Abductions, Dolan states, “It’s a rare book that has the ability to change one’s mind about the world.
Rarest of all are those gems with the ability to change one’s life. High Strangeness is such a book…. High Strangeness is a book that lays out
provocatively and passionately the hidden slavery of the human race.” Dolan goes on to describe the field theory set out in that book, “The human
race is being manipulated physically and spiritually by a race of beings that we know as the Reptilians…. They can manipulate time with ease, they
control the “Greys” and they live in what is known as the Fourth Density. Dolan writes of this field theory, “The Reptilians are able to
manipulate and control us in just the way we can control cattle. But simply because the Reptilians live in a state of consciousness that is higher
than ours does not mean they are ethical. They are, in fact, what we would refer to as pretty evil. They exist in what is called a Service to Self
(STS) state of being.”

A significant phase of the negative Reptilians plan for humanity reportedly may be focused on a transition of planet Earth from Third Density to
Fourth Density, possibly during Solar Cycle 24 solar maximum in 2012-13.

As some may know I am just starting to get my feet wet on the subject of UFOs so I have very little background knowledge to comment on a lot of the
stuff in this article. I encourage you guys to read the whole thing btw, it is far out there stuff but quite logically presented.

In any case I found it a good read and thought I would share and learn from your responses.

Well its just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions, but this sounds like a bunch of sci-fi bull crap passed off as the truth to sell
some books. I have read some other stuff from that Dolan guy and he lives in lala land.

Laura is the author and channel of The Casseopeans, who's words are very wise. I have been quoting her for some time, though few find it very
believable (shame). She is reputed to be one of the purest channels alive (with photographic proof via ectoplasm picturing).

From personal experience (direct form the Soul plane), I can agree with her wholeheartedly. But this will never pass into the rigid, concrete
awareness of most of humanity: it is for those who are at the very edge of knowing, where one is able to connect to the 4th dimensional energies.

And yes, her summation about the reps plans are correct, as I have received via Soul transmission, also. This subject is revelatory, to say the least.
I generally would get a few comments, but she is definitely too far out there for most (sadly), to serve humanity with timely warning. People like it
close behind them, before they will stir to the dangers. It's already past that.

The only people who could possibly look at claims like these and believe them are one's who are desparately wanting to believe reality is different
from what they perceive it to be themselves. They will gladly accept such theories and convince themselves that they might be true. There is
absolutely NO real hard evidence to back ANY of these types of "stories". We can't even learn to accept that maybe UFO's are alien visitors, even
with video/physical evidence, and yet some people will try and spread theories like this with absolutely NO legitimate proof.

Originally posted by Gdc934
The only people who could possibly look at claims like these and believe them are one's who are desparately wanting to believe reality is different
from what they perceive it to be themselves.

What is reality?

Your interpretation of the world or mine?

You see, the world "out there" really isn't something separate from you, we construct it to be that way. In reality, your eyes receive about 80%
of all the data your brain gathers, and then it decides which is important and what should be discarded. Much of what is accepted is based on pattern
recognition -- things your brain can readily identify.

That's why sometimes you look at something and can't tell what it is until someone points it out for you. Your brain can't match the pattern.

That data is then reconstructed in your brain where it makes a picture, a sound, a smell, an emotion, a sensation. . . If you get a paper cut on your
finger and you feel pain, it isn't actually your finger experiencing the sensation, it is your brain. It constructs a sensation that fools you into
believing you're feeling pain in your finger, but it's all just electrical impulses in your head.

Your reality is based on what information your brain chooses to use, how it interprets that data, and how your particular biology reconstructs the
experience in your meat computer. In your reality, I do not actually exist because your reality takes place in your brain.

Oh, and about reality being different than what we perceive. . . that is actually true. We only see a sliver of the light spectrum, hear only a
portion of sounds, have very limited sensations and all of it is based on our biology.

We no more have the "truth" about "reality" than does the average houseplant.

So it seems to me that someone who believes that reality is exactly what they perceive it to be is a person who is utterly delusional.

My point being was people who believe these claims will gladly accept them just because, without having any real reason to embrace such a belief,
usually because they do not wish to accept the current view they have on reality.

Thanks for the long thought out post, I tend to agree with everything you say.

Originally posted by Seany
I read the Article, and usually when I see Reptiles and Greys I leave the thread. Being as I saw it was a SD thread , I stuck around for the entire
read.

Thank you for saying that, that actually means a great deal to me, so really thank you.

Im not so much with the believing, Was a good read though.

I'll tell you why this is interesting to me ... I am by nature a very "still" and "present" person (Eckhart Tolle/Adyashanti kind of thing). So
my perception of what is real is very connected and detached at the same time. I will make the effort to read the book in the OP, but because the
underlying preposition is by nature still a mind made conceptualized construct, it will still have the same "limitations" that any perceived
"reality" has, inasmuch as it is still born of thought.

But ... from the little I have gleamed so far, this construct is somewhat closer to what I know as a universal truth. It is still, if you will, a
chair, but a slightly more comfortable one.

I know I know, I'm being all hippy and junk, but hey, at the very least like you said it seems like an interesting read.

I have never come across a single "predatory" theory that has ever made anything even close to resembling a bit of sense or reason. They usually
revolve around either mystical spiritual energies that have absolutely no empirical evidence, or they rely upon a more flesh and blood model.

The former's lack of evidence is usually explained by it being outside of our perception. Yet if it exists within reality, it must interact with
reality. That interaction is evidence, and it's how we know about other energies we cannot detect with our senses - such as radiation. If it doesn't
interact with reality, then it's of no concern to us. Even if the "Soul" really did exist, it would have to be able to interact with reality to
make our physical bodies move... thus there should be evidence. There is none.

There is every apparent indication that we do not even possess free-will, but that idea even in Academia is generally considered taboo because if
it's incorrect, it's highly irresponsible and damaging to society to falsely claim that nobody is responsible for their actions. If it is correct,
it doesn't matter because that decision was predetermined and the decision to not promote it is out of our hands anyhow. The debate is out there if
you care to read.

The flesh and blood explanation makes no sense either, especially in light of current science. We can currently clone organisms fairly well and even
clone and synthesize new transplant grade organs in clinical tests. We can produce flesh in wide sheets for food production, however it's still
rather new and won't replace slaughterhouse meat until we can start synthesizing flavor and texture. We know and can identify the various bacteria
colonies in Grape Vine roots which modify the flavor of the grapes we notice when sampling identical wines made from grapes grown in different
regions.

If WE can do that at our current level of technology, why is it that a species capable of technology to travel the stars would not have perfected that
technology long ago. They wouldn't need to "extract adrenal glands", they could produce them in mass quantities for very little resources and with
a far greater range of effect. Further, they would have the technology to stimulate their own nerve signals to simulate taste and effect without
anything actually being consumed. Why waste the resources necessary for a limited harvest when you can save the resources and produce so much more.

I suppose you could say it's a cultural thing, but this is kind of a weak argument when you can't even provide any evidence they exist... so how can
you say anything about something like their culture which would require a deep understanding through observation.

And this doesn't address the issue of: If they are indifferent enough about us to enable them to slaughter us for cultural reasons or food when they
have the technology to avoid this... and they have the technology to enable them to reach us across the infinity of space... Then why would they need
to hide? They would simply run ramshackle over us because there's not a damned thing we could do to stop them.

No one has mentioned the most interesting thing about this article: Richard Dolan is an academically trained historian who chose to research and write
about the UFO coverup. His book "UFOs and the National Security State" (Vol 1: vol 2 is supposed to be out any time now) is the definitive scholarly
work on this subject. For him to lend credence to this whole "story" (this story that has been forming in bits and pieces for years now) and
basically put his reputation as a scholar and researcher on the line over it, is no small thing. It would be like Jacques Vallee making a similar
statement, in terms of the credibility of the source. Just something to think about.

My point being was people who believe these claims will gladly accept them just because, without having any real reason to embrace such a belief,
usually because they do not wish to accept the current view they have on reality.

Thanks for the long thought out post, I tend to agree with everything you say.

Yes, I know what you meant, I was merely having fun with you.

You're talking about wishful thinking. I can't really blame people, given the sad
state of affairs.

I was thinking today about people who are psychotic and maybe they see what is really happening around us, things the rest of us can't see.

We're all self-deluded, messed up and slaves to our our desires to see things the way the world should be, not how it is.

You'd be surprised the types of stuff we accept as fact that are based on nothing more than group think. If you're interested, U2U me and I'll
send you the link to a book you can read online (nothing religious or alien) that will blow your mind. . . . if you dare. It ripped the rug right out
from under me.

Originally posted by VelmaLu
You'd be surprised the types of stuff we accept as fact that are based on nothing more than group think.

Yes such as believing that "things" are what we call them, relying on the totality
of forms, conceptualized relativity/duality, and the greatest disinformative statement ever uttered: "I think therefore I am."

Oh, and about reality being different than what we perceive. . . that is actually true. We only see a sliver of the light spectrum, hear only a
portion of sounds, have very limited sensations and all of it is based on our biology.

I agree that human beings only see a sliver of the light spectrum, but what do you mean by "hear only a portion of sounds" and "have very limited
sensations?"

Originally posted by Longchenpa
For him to lend credence to this whole "story" (this story that has been forming in bits and pieces for years now) and basically put his reputation
as a scholar and researcher on the line over it, is no small thing. It would be like Jacques Vallee making a similar statement, in terms of the
credibility of the source. Just something to think about.

He said it was a good book and a valid theory. He didn't say it was a fact.

Personally, I'm skeptical of people claiming to have hidden knowledge gained by "channeling" alien races.

The second my eyes cross manipulating time/time traveling it cries out to me injustice, thus, I stop reading. How dare they massage the essence of God
and we all know too well that there isn't a place for gods in this universe.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.