you so called skeptics are already ‘‘CLAIMANTS’’ without noticing it..

What are we claiming?

Lois

skeptics are claiming that the empirical lack of scientific evidence is proof of the non existence of the supernatural otherwise Randi’s MDC would have gone off a long long time ago ......... actually Randi’s MDC is out there as a factual statement to the skeptic community that the supernatural does not exist…...lol

you so called skeptics are already ‘‘CLAIMANTS’’ without noticing it..

What are we claiming?

Lois

skeptics are claiming that the empirical lack of scientific evidence is proof of the non existence of the supernatural otherwise Randi’s MDC would have gone off a long long time ago ......... actually Randi’s MDC is out there as a factual statement to the skeptic community that the supernatural does not exist…...lol

Since no one has yet shown objective evidence that it does exist, the rational position is to say it probably doesn’t. You are wrong. Skeptics don’t say lack of scientific evidence is proof of non existence. It is proof of a claim not proven, that’s all. The ball is still in the court of those claiming it exists. We are waiting, willing to examine anything anyone considers evidence. Bring it on.