Actually, I don’t think it is a bad representation at all, and very well may be an actual Bigfoot. The suspicious part is the circumstance.

]]>By: Goodfoothttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/momo-makes-a-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-83385
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:47:21 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/?p=61642#comment-83385Worst fake of all time. It should at least be recognized as such.
]]>By: sasquatchhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/momo-makes-a-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-83382
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:56:15 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/?p=61642#comment-83382If that were actually there, they would have noticed!

Look the dude is barely looking past it…He woulda noticed!

The ground is full of leaves etc…the sound woulda tipped him off and they would all have looked right at it! Silly.

]]>By: Allen Garmon via Facebookhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/momo-makes-a-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-83375
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:47:58 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/?p=61642#comment-83375Awfully convenient for it to turn up like that.
]]>By: BukitTimahMonkeyManhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/momo-makes-a-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-83370
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:29:44 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/?p=61642#comment-83370Hmmm…….if this is a Momo it would be rather small for its kind. According to Wikipedia, most reports of Momo say that it is roughly 2m tall. I estimate the creature to be around 1.7m tall.
]]>By: Desertdwellerhttp://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/momo-makes-a-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-83368
Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:00:02 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/?p=61642#comment-83368Yep. It looks like a Bigfoot to me: big, dark, ape-shaped. No cowboy hat.

If this is a hoax, it would have required some advance planning. All the crew were accounted for; the witness arrived on his own on a vehicle incapable of carrying an accomplice. So, who was Momo?

The sighting was on private property. Presumably, the owner gave advance permission to film there. So, it would be safe to say at least one other person knew what was going to happen there in advance.

So, it wasn’t truly a chance encounter. Could have been a set-up by someone hoping to profit from a sighting. This could have been engineered without the witness or crew knowing about it.

If you accept this scenario, then the possibility would also exist that at least one of the crew (or the witness) would have shown up armed in anticipation of an encounter. If there was a hoaxer, he would have been putting himself in extreme danger. Perhaps he observed the group before showing himself, in order to assure himself he would not be shot.

I think Bigfoot is real, but before this type of situation is accepted as evidence, all possibility of a hoax needs to be eliminated first.

Perhaps I am putting an unrealistic condition on my acceptance of this type of evidence, but considering the extreme scrutiny given even the P/G film, I don’t think so.