Looks 'ok', personally wish they had gone with the Kenobi movie. Han is a great character but one whose backstory does not need to be told.

Rumor is Disney are expecting this one to tank hard reviews wise, I hope it's good as these standalones interest me more then the current trilogy.

__________________

Quote:

It is true, I inadvertently gave a Labrador a handjob. You can quote me on that! - Raptor192

Quote:

I walked outside and took mother natures load to the face. You can quote me on that! - Raptor192

to Ashen [ash-en]

1.To perform an amazing act without witness.
2.To have the worst of luck when playing in groups, although having the best intentions an act occurs which usually results in multiple deaths, maimings or destruction of property.

Lando is a plant to figure out whats going on
Droids are expendable slaves in the Starwars universe good for smuggling sabers
Leia is there to get Han out of carbonite
Luke is essentially there as the clean up crew and as a Jedi is never in danger (rancor aside) - at any point he can just turn to the guards and get them to release him after all (you'd think folks would gag jedis...)

I think the reason to over debate it is the whether a Jedi can consciously just kill lots of baddies. Given that Jedis are essentially Paladins from D&D the Gygax view applies, which is essentially that in a fantasy world of absolute good and evil, destroying evil is a good act.

Yes, it's the Onion but its summed up pretty much everything I've thought about this movie since I saw the first trailer. I'm not a Star Wars fan though so I'd imagine my opinion means very little to the die-hards out there.

__________________"If some cunt can fuck something up, that cunt will pick the worst fucking time to fucking fuck up because that cunt's a cunt!" - Tuckers Law