For the last few weeks we have been subjected to
a barrage of propaganda in the media about the so-called "attacks on freedom of
expression" in Venezuela. But here is a story that you are not likely to see in the media.

For the last few
weeks we have been subjected to a barrage of propaganda in the media about the
so-called "attacks on freedom of expression" in Venezuela. Facts? A TV station,
RCTV, which actively participated in the coup against president ChÃ¡vez in April
2002, did not get its licence renewed.

Acres of print
paper have been filled with this story. However, one that you are not likely to
see reported is this other story:
Yesterday, June 12, Youtube decided to close
down the account of Venezuelan Bolivarian activist Luigino Bracci. The reason?
A complaint over copyright by Spanish Antena 3 TV station.

Why? A few weeks
ago, Antena 3 TV broadcasted a debate about the case of RCTV's licence. In this
programme Spanish university professors Luis Alegre Zahonero and Carlos FernÃ¡ndez Liria debated Venezuelan GlobovisiÃ³n journalist Nitu Perez Osuna. They did it so effectively that in
the end it was clear to all that Nitu Perez was actually a defender of the
April 2002 military coup in Venezuela. Extracts from the programme were
broadcasted by two different programmes on Venezuelan state TV channel VTV, "La
Hojilla" and "Dando Dando". Then, Bolivarian media activist Luigino Bracci took
them from VTV and uploaded the videos on Youtube. These were then reproduced on
a whole number of left wing and revolutionary web sites. The site was the most
seen Youtube video in Spanish that day.

This was too much
for the "democratic" opposition in Venezuela and their "freedom of expression"
loving friends abroad. They could not allow a Globovision journalist and the
RCTV case to be exposed for what they really are. So, Antena 3 complained to
google, the owner of Youtube, and demanded that the offending videos be
removed. Youtube, then proceeded to close down Bracci's whole account (http://www.youtube.com/user/lbracci), which had
more than 450 different videos and had received more than 1.4 million visits in
the last few weeks over the RCTV affair. So much for democracy and freedom of
expression!

The real reason for this action by Antena 3 and Youtube has
nothing to do with copyright law. The video uploaded was a clip that had been
broadcasted by VTV. If Antena 3 wants to pursue its rights it should do so with
VTV. A simple search of Youtube's archive will show that there are plenty of
videos taken from Antena 3 available and have been so for some time. One of
them is a video of an interview with Marcel Granier, owner of RCTV, by Antena 3 which
was then reproduced by Venezuelan TV station Globovision!! No problem with that
it seems....

In an interview in VTV , former Minister of Education
AristÃ³bulo Izturiz put it very clearly: "this shows that the campaign around
RCTV is not about freedom of expression, but the freedom of the owners of
capital to control the media and the contents".