Heidguy wrote:On the day we nearly double our sack total for the season in 1 game you make a thread to complain about not having Adrian Clayborn of all ppl?? Smh lol, that's just silly

It was more a poke at the way the Buccaneers have handled their DE position over the last several years and less of a compliment to a guy. If you are still trying to figure out what I mean then ask yourself... is Ayers really any different than Clayborn?

I was mad when we let him walk. Not because I think he's a great player or worth the first we spent on him, but because he's a decent starter or excellent depth. Too many Bucs fans get an "all-pro or no-pro" mentality. The majority of a successful roster is decent to good players. We could certainly use a few more of those- especially in the trenches.

I Are Serious Poster wrote:Wish we always played against those left tackles Dallas trotted in there.

Yeah no way he gets 1 sack against Tyron Smith. He was literally going up against guys off the street. How Dallas didn't change the game plan and constantly double block or chip with a TE after the 3rd sack is amazing.

I Are Serious Poster wrote:Wish we always played against those left tackles Dallas trotted in there.

Yeah no way he gets 1 sack against Tyron Smith. He was literally going up against guys off the street. How Dallas didn't change the game plan and constantly double block or chip with a TE after the 3rd sack is amazing.

Yes, I knew Dallas would be hurting not having Tyron Smith in the line up. I didn't think they would be 6-sacks-by-Adrian-Clayborn-hurting.

Watching the Cowboys Eagles game and Collinsworth just said he was surprised that the Eagles DE got Prescott down when he was unblocked. My first thought was is it really that difficult, Clayborne did it 6 times in one game.

The Outsider wrote:Been watching Clayborn this game. He's rushing the passer better than I've ever seen him do. Damn I wish we hadn't gotten rid of him. He's been in the backfield all night. I mean, he's literally a rich man's Ayers and younger at that.

Posting that here because I didn't see this thread because I've been drinking 1792.