Congressman Richard E. Neal Letter to Secretary of State Clinton

The Honorable Hillary Clinton
Secretary of State
United States Department of State
Washington, D.C. 20521

Dear Madame Secretary,

As the Ranking Member of the Friends of Ireland Caucus in the U. S. House of Representatives, and someone who has worked for three decades to help bring peace and reconciliation to the island of Ireland, I am writing to express my concern over the British governments efforts to obtain confidential documents and recordings from Boston College’s Oral History Archive on the Troubles in Northern Ireland. It is my sincere belief that if this material is made public, particularly at this time, it has the potential of destabilizing the peace that both you and President Clinton worked so hard to achieve. It could also place the lives of many of the participants at risk.

The Good Friday Agreement, and the implementation of a devolved power sharing government, are some of the most significant American foreign policy accomplishments in recent memory. In fact, Northern Ireland is now viewed as a model for successful conflict resolution around the globe. From the Middle East to Sri Lanka, other societies in dispute now look to the political leaders on that island to learn the lessons of peace making and ending armed confrontation. Ancient adversaries now work side-by-side building a shared future. After a long and difficult peace process, in which the United States contribution was indispensible, Northern Ireland is truly a society in transformation.

While I fully understand the United States has an obligation to honor the terms of our Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the British government, it is the belief of many people on both sides of the Atlantic who took risks for peace that the requests for the documents is selective and politically motivated. More importantly, and as noted by the highly respected Brehon Law Society; “statements on tapes that were not sworn and were intended not to be disclosed until after the deaths of the people making the recordings have no legal value. It must be recognized that this is information and not evidence. It is not sworn testimony which could be used in a court of law.”

When President Obama made his historic visit to Ireland last year, he said “how inspired we have been by the progress that has been made in Northern Ireland.” I am certain that millions of Irish Americans would agree with that sentiment. But the release of the Boston College documents would help undermine that very progress and unfasten a fragile peace. As a result, I strongly urge you to encourage the British government to reassess their position and withdraw their request. I thank you for your leadership and all you have done to bring peace and stability to the island of Ireland.

SITE MAP

The value of the Oral Tradition is its democracy; it doesn't give to an intellectual elite the exclusive right to shape a communal memory and the collective memory. It makes into a common wealth the story of our shared lives. It's something that we share in common – and it's like a collection plate into which we can all put something: our stories, our myths and the ease with which we are able to, in some way, cross boundaries. - Cleophus Thomas, Jr.

First Circuit Court of Appeals

May, 2013

“… we must forcefully conclude that preserving the judicial power to supervise the enforcement of subpoenas in the context of the present case, guarantees the preservation of a balance of powers… In substance, we rule that the enforcement of subpoenas is an inherent judicial function which, by virtue of the doctrine of separation of powers, cannot be constitutionally divested from the courts of the United States. Nothing in the text of the US-UK MLAT, or its legislative history, has been cited by the government to lead us to conclude that the courts of the United States have been divested of an inherent judicial role that is basic to our function as judges.”

“… the district court acted within its discretion in ordering their production, it abused its discretion in ordering the production of a significant number of interviews that only contain information that is in fact irrelevant to the subject matter of the subpoena.”

Follow BCSN

Subscribe to BCSN

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.