No one shaves the barber if he is a tranny or a woman or a child that doesn't have facial hair to shave or he has had his beard lasered off or he uses Nair hair removal. You don't need to shave those who don't have hair to shave. This is implied by the nature of shaving due to shaving needs.
No one shaves the barber if he is a tranny or a woman or a child that doesn't have facial hair to shave or he has had his beard lasered off or he uses Nair hair removal. You don't need to shave those who don't have hair to shave. This is implied by the nature of shaving due to shaving needs.

Phil asked in another post what is the definition of a definition and so in similar spirit I am asking what are the rules of rules and what is the essence of the smallest unit by which all rules might be made?

A definition is a boundary that contains the meaning of something in terms of something else. It is a container that also contains itself. This is kinda like a fractal where things repeat again and again to smaller levels or two mirrors facing each other where light bounces back and forth indefinitely.

Physicists usually contextualize this law to experiments in thermodynamics and they do not know about creation. Sometimes they forget as do teacher. Existence is a relative word which means that there are three objects present for something to exist, an object that has a perspective, a relationship object, and an object that is being perceived. The truth of an object that is being perceived or experienced is communicated to the perspective via the relationship object(s). A relationship is a container it keeps things in and it keeps things out, it connects and divides. If the universe was built out of a pure love relationship then being everything and nothing and one thing it would die and perform mitosis splitting in two as it's connecting nature squeezes it down and it's separating nature rips it apart yet it would remain connected. The truthful manifestation of the growing relationship structure with respect to perspective and it's truthful order is time, distance, and dimension. Reality to perspective is the truth that it experiences. Paradox gives rise to phenomena for an object can be both near and far at the same time and communicated to multiple perspectives at the same time and these things must be communicated/resolved truthfully to a perspective.

Biblically Eve was cloned from one of Adams ribs technically making Eve both his sister and his wife. It is said commonly that women are one step more refined than men in reference to this biblical event. So in a sense Biblically they are two different stages of a development process but in the reverse order to that of Dr. Fulzele being that women are refined out of men. If you are trying to say the women are paradoxically men or the men are paradoxically women over the long run I have yet to run into any evidence of it. Perhaps I'm just a lesbian trapped in a man's body, please explain further the paradox of it all.

The answer is that both the line and the line segments are made out of discrete relationships. Discrete relationships are container keeping things in and keeping things out. They also are objects. Being that a line is created from them distance is measured by the degree of separation the discrete relationships provide. Also being containers that contain each other they eventually contain themselves in fractal form so the line segment can be both discrete and of finite length AND infinite as it is fractally manifest you simply need a perspective on the combined object that contains both perspectives. This provides a easy and truthful resolution to this paradox.

It is possible that people can make their beliefs into gods by upholding them above God in their lives. God is a title and position. In Christianity is says that God puts his word above his name. This is to say truth before title. If something holds that position in your life does it not also retain the title attributed to that position?

If Rich uses "No God" as an adjective, that names his god.
Faith, fighting, defenses, dogmas, intransigence and playing cards don't affect this.
I was trying to move beyond semantics and address the deeper realities.

You will also get diminishing returns on your money the greater the supply that you create it may become worthless for the effort if you inflate it too much. Other people may become grumpy and do away with you as well.

There is another limit and that is the amount of time you are willing to take time traveling back and forth executing this scheme. Future stock charts and sports gambling might provide a better return for the effort.