Hi! I'm Cinnominbubble and I have noticed the war between fandoms have been going on for a while with no clear outcome. There is a reason to this-We are stubborn. Twihards want to stick up for Stephanie Meyer, whilst Potterheads want to do the same for J. K. Rowling. But, I have noticed something. Many of our reasonings aren't exactly logical. I mean, not to be offensive, some of our strongest points are downright idiotic!(from both sides) I'd like to come up with some smarter points to help people see our side of the story, whatever that side may be! It would do well to expect еще of these in the future because of all the idiocy going around.(Again, not to be offensive)

I am a Фан of Harry Potter but I'd like to acknowledge both sides to the story. People will be yelling at me at the end of this, so in advance, I say sorry for anything offensive.

-First off, I'd just like to say to Ты twihards, Harry Potter came first in 1998, whereas Twilight came out in 2005, I believe. So J.K Rowling did not copy Stephanie Meyer. I am in possession of both these series' and though Jacob and Sirius both have the same last name, and can both transform into dog-like figures, that is where the similarities stop. Sirius Black is a prisoner escaped from the wizard prison, Azkaban, where he was placed under false pretences. He is an old friend of Harry's parents, and is also Harry's godfather. He is only able to become a dog because he is an animagus, a witch или wizard with the ability to transform into a certain animal at will. He became an Animagus illegally in order to help his friend, Remus Lupin, who was a werewolf, through those bleak nights where there was a full moon. Волколаки only attack humans and so Sirius was only безопасно, сейф while in his dog form. Jacob Black on the other hand, is not a real werewolf. In Breaking Dawn, his species is called Shape-shifters as Aro says himself. He is only a shape-shifter because it runs in his family and... Yah. That subject all cleared up? I hope so.

-I have heard people saying that Twilight is a better Любовь story but there's an easy answer to that... Harry Potter isn't a Любовь story. Sure, if Ты are into that genre, go for Twilight, but is not fair to say that Harry Potter is a bad book just because it's not a romance novel.

-Yah, ok the Harry Potter characters have flaws! Bella and Rosalie seem to be the only ones with flaws in the entire series, Bella's being her disability to understand what goes on around her sometimes, and Rosalie's being over-the-top-jeolosy... Those don't even seem like flaws! Harry's cast on the other hand, has plenty of flaws. Hermione with her buck-teeth and bad posture, Mrs. Weasley with her over-protectiveness et cetera. But as someone in history said, Flaws are what give your character, well, character! There are plenty of people in Harry Potter with less flaws(Cho, Cedric, et al.) but flaws none the less. So again, if Ты prefer Книги where Ты characters are close to perfect, be my guest and read Twilight. I personally found the characters еще relatable,(mainly Hermione) with their flaws and anger management issues.

Now I know I haven't addressed most of the major questions, but I honestly can't remember anymore(it's 10:06 PM, I just came Главная from piano! Cut me some slack please...wow I whine a lot!) Feel free to give me feedback, Вопросы and requests for my Далее article(this is my first for Logical Reasons) Go ahead, tell me how bad it is, cant get any worse than what I (or Ralph[inside joke]) tell myself:D I will Редактировать to accommodate all new questions, unless I get an overflow of questions. I will create an Статья for any point, if logical and/or if I understand/know of it. Since this is my first, I don't expect much. Just, if Ты have any negative comments(Twihards, if I wrote something wrong etc.)tell me in non Трофеи form(don't be angry)

Yours in demigodishness, and all that. Peace Out! Cinnominbubble >.<

hermgrangerxx, IH8Twilight and 2 others like this

tsmith120 Well, definitely a well-mannered article. I can't imagine you'll be offending either side any time soon; that's definitely a good thing, makes it much easier to take the argument seriously. Some decent points made here, but... 1958? I don't think Harry Potter came out quite THAT early. Aside from that, well done. I know it can be hard to write something when tired, so kudos to you for that. If kudos is still a thing. Which it may not be. In which case sorry, replace it for a more modern word of your choice that makes sense.

cinnominbubble Thank you and yes, I checked the date of when the Sorcerers stone came out and it was 1998. Kudos is fine:)
I made a mistake thanks for pointing that out

Silver78 ...Clearly some strange contradictory as to when the books first came out, but I have to agree, 1958 doesn't seem right, since unless you're proposing that J.K Rowling is in her 60-70's which she isn't. She's born in 1965. The book officially came out in 1997. But, you did quite well! Quite the diplomat, aren't you?

cinnominbubble I'm so sorry, I was going by my phones info and yah I made a mistake!!

cassie-1-2-3 Oh gosh... Jacob Black is not an animigus, as he is not a wizard who had to study and learn or whatever they had to do to become one. There is no animigus gene that runs in the family and is only triggered by nearby vampirism. They are not the same thing. I honestly don't get why people continue to say this. Are they not completely aware of what an animigus even is?
- I've seen this argument many times, though the other way around. People saying Twilight is bad because there isn't enough action or wars and battles and for having too much romance, despite it being a romance story. But either way, I agree.
- The flaws argument, I'm done with that. It gets too touchy.

cinnominbubble I didn't mean to offend you in any way! If I did I am extremely sorry! I know he is not animagus, but if you were to put him into a wizarding column , that's what would happen. I am so sorry about any mistakes. Feel free to critique anything you found disturbing.

cassie-1-2-3 No, you're fine. That was the only thing I was bothered by.
It's still not really the same, aside from the shifting into an animal aspect. Being an animagus is still not genetic, it's not triggered by an external being, they're limited to shifting into only one animal (The Twilight shifters were able to shift into other animals, only they didn't because they were unaware of the possibility). All wizards have the potential to become an animagus.
The details are in no way similar.

cinnominbubble Oh ok, I didn't understand what you were getting at for a second, I'll edit it.

sugarpalstar Personally I think Stephanie Meyer copied JK Rowling. Honestly, did any of you twihards think of that???

cinnominbubble I may be a potterhead, but I'm also way more involved in another fandomI know what it's like to be in a convo like this and have everyone against you. I really didn't want to be rude.

cassie-1-2-3 I don't think you were being rude.
There was only one thing I was slightly offended by, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't intentional so I didn't say anything.
The part where you felt that you had to inform fans of Twilight that Harry Potter was written first. That's not an actual argument of Twilight fans. Not that I've ever seen, at least. I don't know how long you're been following this Harry Potter vs Twilight situation, but there was a point where it was nothing but mean and nasty tactics. That ridiculous forum about JK Rowling copying Stephenie Meyer was not written by a Twilight fan. It was written by someone who hates Twilight to an irrational degree, pretending to be a Twilight fan just to make the fans look stupid. It used to happen all the time here, it was ridiculous. And I'm pretty sure it happened the other way around as well.

cinnominbubble OMG I'm so sorry, it's just that I've seen soo many people say that J K Rowling copied Stephanie Meyer and that's kind of where I started getting mad.

cinnominbubble So if it was fake, I'm sorry

cassie-1-2-3 It's fine,don't be sorry. It's no big deal.

cinnominbubble Thanks:)

LunaNotLoony Actually, Harry Potter and the philosopher's stone came out in 1997, not 1998. Maybe it came out in America in 1998, but it was first published in 1997.

hermgrangerxx I agree with this article :)

Minervina cassie-1-2-3
I get that he isn't a total among but he defiantly isn't a real werewolf
And I'm not sure that it is a twilight hater that tries to make twihard look stupid( maby in a article in this website There is)
There are just the stupid kind of fans every were
Some have more some less it is about the age range
You will find your stupid hp fans your stupid hg fans and your stupid twilight fans
Not saying all twilight fans are stupid or any thing about the ages that watch it it is just sometimes the case)

We've all seen and/or participated in discussions regarding who is "the better Bella". Many of Ты are also aware of the Charlies, and the two Alices. This got me thinking, exactly how many characters from these two series have the same names?

Out of boredom, I compiled this Список of characters with same или similar names as another character from the opposing series.You'll notice this Список only includes first name comparisons.

NOTE: I am not accusing anyone of stealing anything. This is just for fun.