A Tale of Two Jesuits

Dimitri Cavalli on Why the Media Celebrated One & Ignored
the Other

On May 9, 2005, the Reverend Thomas Reese, S.J., announced that he would
resign as the editor-in-chief of America, the highly respected Jesuit
weekly magazine. Many liberal Catholics blamed the newly elected Pope Benedict
XVI with forcing Reese out because he published articles questioning the church’s
teachings and the Vatican’s policies on such topics as same-sex marriage,
homosexual priests, and denying Holy Communion to pro-abortion Catholic politicians.

Several months later, many details about Reese’s resignation still
remain sketchy. It is known that Benedict XVI, when he headed the Vatican’s
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) as Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger,
complained about certain articles that America had published. But
did the new pope actually force Reese out? The Reverend Jose M. de Vera, S.J.,
a spokesman for the Society of Jesus in Rome, was quoted by the Catholic News
Service as saying that Reese “tendered his resignation. It was not imposed,
contrary to what was written.”

Reese’s only statement on the controversy, which was posted on America’s
website, did not shed any light on why he decided to resign. “I am proud
of what my colleagues and I did with the magazine, and I am grateful to them,
our readers, and our benefactors for the support they gave me,” Reese
said. “I look forward to taking a sabbatical while my provincial and
I determine the next phase of my Jesuit ministry.”

Father Reese is hardly a martyr, even if Cardinal Ratzinger did ask for his
removal. Unlike some other Jesuits who have gotten into trouble with their
superiors, he has not been barred from teaching, publishing, or even speaking
to the media. Last July, Reese joined the faculty of the Jesuit-run Santa Clara
University in California.

Rallying Around Reese

Whatever Reese’s motivations for resigning are, his departure outraged
many liberal Catholics, who expressed fears of a new Vatican crackdown on the
free discussion of issues important to the future of the church.

“As a consequence,” Commonweal, the lay liberal Catholic
magazine, warned in a May 20 editorial, “the first thing many Americans
are now likely to associate with Pope Benedict XVI’s papacy will be yet
another act of Vatican repression. Does this mean that the zeal with which
then-Cardinal Ratzinger harried theologians while head of the CDF will continue
during his papacy?”

Some critics argued that Reese did nothing wrong. In an interview with New
York Newsday, the Reverend Richard McBrien, a professor of theology
at the University of Notre Dame and a prominent dissident theologian, defended
Reese. “[He] has been very careful to be even-handed, fair-minded,
and restrained in any comments he’s ever made, either in the run-up
to this papal election or in his books,” McBrien asserted. “I
would be astonished if anyone except extreme right-wingers would be offended
by anything he’s either written or said.” He told the Associated
Press that Reese’s removal implied that the Vatican and its American
allies “don’t think it’s possible to discuss both sides.”

Others spoke more dramatically. In a press release on its website published
the same day as Reese’s announcement, the Association for the Rights
of Catholics in the Church (ARCC), a dissident organization led by long-time
dissenting theologian Leonard Swidler, called on the pope

to recall his childhood under a fascist regime that ruthlessly stifled freedom
of the press and to use his authority to allow Jesuit superiors to reinstate
Fr. Thomas Reese, S.J., as Editor of America Magazine. . . . Unless
and until this injustice has been officially rectified, ARCC calls on all
truth-seeking Catholics to withhold their annual Peter’s Pence contribution
[a donation to the Vatican] and to put a note in the envelope, indicating
why there is no donation and where the money is being sent instead.

The media gave Reese’s resignation extensive attention. The wire services
such as the Associated Press and Reuters picked up the story. The New
York Times published an article on the front page. The television networks,
PBS, cable television stations, and National Public Radio (NPR) covered it.

Not surprisingly, most of the media coverage was sympathetic to Reese. Many
of the stories and segments quoted liberal Catholics, who criticized the Vatican
for forcing Reese out and warning of a new wave of censorship coming from Rome.
Tom Roberts, the editor-in-chief of the liberal National Catholic Reporter, told Newsday that
Father Reese was “forced out” by the Vatican, and condemned the
action as “an appalling affront to intelligent discourse.”

Into Exile

Three years earlier, another prominent Jesuit priest was disciplined for
voicing controversial opinions. A theologian who studied for his doctorate
under then-Father Ratzinger in Germany, the Reverend Joseph Fessio, S.J., co-founded
Ignatius Press in 1978 to publish translations of the works of European Catholic
theologians, philosophers, and authors. Under his leadership, it has become
one of the top publishers of Catholic literature in the United States, including Catholic
World Report, a monthly news magazine, and a journal called the Homiletic
and Pastoral Review.

Several years ago, Fessio became disillusioned with the Jesuit-run University
of San Francisco, where he taught theology and founded a great books program
called the St. Ignatius Institute. He publicly criticized the university for
overhauling the institute and taking “un-Catholic” actions such
as hiring an openly homosexual dean and staging Eve Ensler’s sexually
explicit play, The Vagina Monologues, during Lent.

In March 2002, Fessio announced the formation of Campion College, a two-year
Catholic institution that would provide an alternative to the University of
San Francisco. Fessio’s actions immediately brought down the wrath of
his Jesuit superiors.

On March 11, 2002, the Reverend Thomas Smolich, S.J., the provincial of the
California Jesuits, sent Fessio a letter telling him that “Campion College
was not and is not part of your assignment from the Society of Jesus, as determined
by me as your provincial.” Smolich continued, “You are to have
no role, public or private, in Campion College, just as Campion has no relationship
with the Society of Jesus.”

In what was clearly a punishment, Smolich assigned Fessio to serve as chaplain
of Santa Teresita Hospital in Duarte, a small town in southern California.
Smolich allowed Fessio to continue running Ignatius Press, but warned him that
it could be taken away from him if it was not kept separate from Campion College.
Fessio complained that his superiors were trying to silence him and get him
out of the way.

How much media attention did the exile of one of the most prominent Catholic
publishers in the United States receive? The wire services ignored it. There
was nothing in the New York Times. In fact, the only mainstream newspaper
that covered Father Fessio’s “reassignment” was the San
Jose Mercury News. The television networks, PBS, the cable news shows,
and NPR showed no interest.

What about liberal Catholics who have rallied to Reese’s defense? Both Commonweal and
the National Catholic Reporter were silent on Fessio’s exile.
One would think that Reese would have come to the aid of his fellow Jesuit,
but America passed on the story as well. (It might have been problematic
for America even to discuss the Fessio case, since Smolich is also
Reese’s superior within the order.)

The often-quoted Richard McBrien made no statement. The ARCC, which was established
by Catholic dissidents in 1980 in response to the Vatican’s removal of
Father Hans Küng’s license to teach Catholic theology, issued no
press releases.

After a public outcry from many conservative Catholics, in June 2002 Smolich
allowed Fessio to accept an offer to serve as the chancellor of Ave Maria University
in Naples, Florida, where he is today.

A Double Standard

Why was the liberal Reese portrayed as a martyr for his alleged dismissal,
while the real exile of the conservative Fessio was practically ignored?

Unlike Reese, Fessio has never been popular with liberal Catholics, including
some of his fellow Jesuits, who resent his influence and unapologetic defense
of the church’s teachings. A Vatican loyalist, he does not fit the mainstream
media’s image of a contemporary martyr. By contrast, the Reese episode
gives liberal Catholics and their allies in the secular media another opportunity
to criticize the Vatican and to raise doubts about the new pope, whose commitment
to Catholic orthodoxy offends their sensibilities.

One would take more seriously the demand of liberal Catholics for tolerance
and greater democracy within the church if they did not turn a blind eye to
repressive measures used by liberals and dissidents who have obtained positions
of power within the church to harass, intimidate, and silence conservative
Catholics—if, that is, they were truly liberal.

Dimitri Cavalli is an editor and writer in New York City. He is planning to write books on both Pope Pius XII and Joe McCarthy, the late manager of the New York Yankees.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe
to Touchstone today for full online access. Over 30 years of content!

Touchstone is a Christian journal, conservative in doctrine and eclectic in content, with editors and readers from each of the three great divisions of Christendom—Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox.

The mission of the journal and its publisher, The Fellowship of St. James, is to provide a place where Christians of various backgrounds can speak with one another on the basis of shared belief in the fundamental doctrines of the faith as revealed in Holy Scripture and summarized in the ancient creeds of the Church.