Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the court abused its discretion when it excluded exculpatory evidence of possible alternative perpetrators
II. Whether the defendant was denied his constitutional right to confront witnesses when a special procedure was used for the child-victim to testify with her back to the defendant without the court first making a determination on the record that
there was a need for the child to testify in this manner.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the trial court's exclusion of dream evidence and the suspected
abuse report was proper when the victim's dream did not contemplate
Miller and consisted of hearsay without any indicia of reliability
and the suspected abuse report lacked any probative value as it
was considered
II. Whether an accused's rights under the confrontation clause are
fully protected when the trialn the court permits a child witness
to face the jury while testifying