[Note: Annotations made in green text below are tips/commentary by ILPI, not OSHA.]

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Index (We deleted the index. Instead, use the Find functionality of your browser instead. If that doesn't find what you want, try the Search box at the top of this page.)

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), 29 CFR 1910.1200 was published in the Federal Register on November 25, 1983 (48 F.R. 53280).

Action. OSHA Regional Administrators and Area Directors shall use the guidelines in this instruction to ensure uniform enforcement of the HCS. The Directorate of Compliance Programs, Office of Health Compliance Assistance, will provide support as necessary to assist the Regional Administrators and Area Directors in enforcing the HCS.

State Impact. This instruction describes a Federal Program Change for which State adoption is not required. See paragraph I.

Federal Program Change. This instruction describes a Federal Program change for which State adoption is not required.

In order to effectively enforce safety and health standards, guidance to compliance staff is necessary. Therefore, although adoption of this instruction is not required, States are expected to have standards, enforcement policies and procedures which are at least as effective as those of Federal OSHA. A State's procedures for enforcement of its hazard communication standard should address the means by which the State will handle referrals from Federal OSHA or other State plans concerning inadequate or deficient MSDSs prepared by a manufacturer within its jurisdiction. (See paragraph E.1.d. of this instruction.)

As a result of the February 21, 1990, Supreme Court decision (see Dole, Secretary of Labor, et. al., v. United Steelworkers of America et. al., No. 88-1434), all provisions of the rule are now in effect for all industrial segments, including the three previously stayed provisions mentioned above. OSHA extended the compliance date until March 17, 1989, for programmed inspections in the construction industry.

On February 9, 1994, OSHA published the final rule for Hazard Communication (59 F.R. 6126). This modified final rule included a number of minor changes and technical amendments to further clarify the requirements of the standard.

Organization of this Instruction. Compliance guidelines are addressed within the main part of this instruction. Clarifications, interpretations, review aids and other information are provided in Appendices A through E. This directive will include references which will allow the interpretative provisions to be accessed through the OSHA Web Site.

Appendix A of this instruction provides clarifications of provisions of the standard where significant interpretations have been necessary to ensure uniform enforcement and understanding.

Inspection Guidelines. The following guidelines apply to all inspections conducted to determine compliance with the HCS:

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Inspection Guidance. Although the HCS contains some specification requirements, it is largely a performance-oriented standard. The standard establishes a goal that allows employers wide flexibility to develop a program suitable to their facility. CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] should weigh particular HCS deficiencies in light of the effectiveness of an employer's overall hazard communication program. Citations should be written to reflect the degree that the employer failed to meet this goal and the hazard the deficiency represents.

Documentation. In addition to those items required by the FIRM, when citations are recommended, the CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] shall document the following on the OSHA-1B or, as appropriate, elsewhere in the case file:

Name of the person preparing the hazard determination, written program, label, MSDS, etc., and the company for whom they work.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall ensure that the number of employees who may be exposed (including potential exposure or foreseeable emergencies) to the chemical in the establishment is documented.

If practical, include a photocopy or a photograph of inaccurate and/or any incomplete label(s)/MSDS, or video footage of unlabeled containers in the case file. Otherwise document the specific deficiency in the case file. If the volume of inaccurate/incomplete MSDSs cannot reasonably be included in the file, then a representative number should be documented, indexing those referenced in the citation.

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Scope and Application - Paragraph (b). The scope paragraph clearly states that the HCS applies to any chemical which is known to be present in the workplace in a manner that employees may be exposed, regardless of whether the employer has created the chemical exposure. The mere presence of a hazardous chemical in the
workplace does not trigger coverage under the standard. There must be actual or potential exposure to an employee. [Emphasis ours - ILPI]

Consumer Products, 1910.1200(b)(6)(ix) - It is the Agency's policy not to issue citations for consumer products unless the CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] can document that the product was used in the workplace in a manner not intended by the manufacturer or the frequency and duration of use results in exposures that are significantly greater than those experienced by a normal consumer. [See here for some official interpretation links - ILPI] To ensure that citations of the HCS for consumer products are adequately documented, the following elements must be included in the case file:

What information established the chemical as a consumer product?
For instance, was the container label subject to the Consumer Product Safety Act provisions? (The term "consumer product" means any article, or component part thereof, produced or distributed

for sale to a consumer for use in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise, or

for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of a consumer in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise...(15 U.S.C.A. 2052))

What is/are the hazardouschemical(s) present in the product to
which employees were exposed? What is/are the concentration(s) of the
hazardous chemical present? Was the product included in the employer's
hazardous chemical inventory?

What is the duration of use of the product, i.e., for what period of
time did the employees use the chemical during the workshift and workweek?
Did it greatly exceed normal or expected use by a consumer?

Was the frequency of employee use significantly greater than that
of a normal consumer? (See Appendix A.)

How was the product used and in what amounts? Was the product
used in the workplace for the purpose intended by the manufacturer?

When available, include in the file the MSDS for the cited product to aid in determining coverage and intended use(s).

(1) The above instruction regarding consumer products cancels and
supersedes the Agency's March 21, 1995, compliance instruction to OSHA
Regional Administrators entitled, "HCS: Documentation of Citations Related to
the Exposure to Hazardous Substances and Consumer Products." This
document is included as Appendix A of OSHA Instruction CPL 2.111.

Articles, 1910.1200(b)(6)(v) - For HCS violations involving manufactured items which under normal conditions of use may release
hazardouschemicals and are not otherwise exempted from coverage as "articles," the following shall be documented in the case file:

What is the hazardous chemical in the item to which employees were exposed? Was this item included in the employer's hazardous chemical inventory?

What were the activities/operations that resulted in employee exposure
to the hazardous chemical(s)? Did the release of the covered chemical(s) pose any potential physical hazard or health risk to the employees?

[Other] For both consumer products and items not meeting the article exemption, the specific hazardouschemical in the product/item shall be described in the citation. In the case of mixtures, the concentration of the hazardous chemical shall also be noted. For example, the Agency shall not issue citations simply stating that "glue" or "dishwashing liquid" was the hazardous consumer product or that "brick" was the hazardous chemical in a manufactured item. The citation must state the name of the hazardous chemical (for example, silica, methyl ethyl ketone,
sodium hydroxide, etc.).

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Inspection Guidelines. The adequacy of a company's hazard determination
program should be assessed primarily by examining the outcome of that determination; i.e., the accuracy and adequacy of the information on labels and MSDSs and by reviewing the manufacturer's/distributor's written hazard
evaluation procedures. The written procedures generally describe the process
followed; they do not have to address, individually, each chemical evaluated.

The hazard evaluation must include an assessment of both physical and health hazards. The chemicalmanufacturer or importer must consider the potential exposures that may occur when downstream employers use the product, and address the hazards that may result from that use on the label and MSDS prepared for the product.

Hazard determination procedures do not have to be maintained on site, consequently, the CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] may have to request them. The CSHO may allow the manufacturer (importer, distributor, employer) up to five working days to produce the procedures.

In the event that there are any questions concerning the adequacy of the
scientific data underlying a chemical manufacturer's hazard determination, the
Area Director (AD) should refer those findings to OSHA's Salt Lake Laboratory for review.

Citations for violations of paragraph (d)(1) shall be issued when the preparer has failed to perform a hazard determination. Paragraphs
(d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), and (d)(5) of the standard shall be used, as appropriate.

If the preparer has not developed an MSDS and no written procedures are available, then violations of both paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(6) exist and shall be recommended for citation. (Refer to paragraph E.2. of this instruction for guidance.)

Failure to provide the hazard determination procedures within five working days shall result in the issuance of a citation under (d)(6).

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

The written program should be reviewed first, prior to ascertaining
whether the elements of the program have been implemented in the workplace. In general, the written program should consider the following elements, where applicable:

Designation of person(s) responsible for obtaining/maintaining the
MSDSs.

How the data sheets are to be maintained (e.g., in notebooks in the work area(s), in a pick-up truck at the jobsite, via telefax), procedures on how to retrieve MSDSs electronically, including back-up systems to be used in the event of failure of the electronic equipment, and how employees obtain access to the MSDSs.

Procedures to follow when the MSDS is not received at the time of the
first shipment.

For chemicalmanufacturers or importers, procedures for updating the
MSDS when new and significant health information is found.

Are methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards
of non-routine tasks outlined? Do those methods include procedures regarding how employees will be informed of potential hazards at other worksites they may visit and at multi-employer worksites?

Are employees informed of the hazards associated with chemicals contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas?

Does the written plan include the methods the employer will use on
multi-employer worksites to provide other employers with on-site access to MSDSs?

Does the plan include the methods the employer will use at
multi-employer worksites to inform other employers of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees?

For multi-employer workplaces, are the methods the employer will use
to inform the other employer(s) of the labeling system used clearly described?

Is the written program made available to employees and their designated representatives upon request?

Generally, all violations of paragraph (e) shall be grouped with the
violated element(s) listed in the subparagraphs of (e) and/or violations of paragraphs (f), (g), and (e)(1) is the only provision under paragraph (e) which addresses the development, implementation and maintenance of the written hazard communication program. Specific citation guidance is given below:

If an employer has done nothing to comply with the HCS, citations for violations of paragraphs (e), (f), (g), and (h) of the standard may be issued as separate items, with separate penalties. Normally these employers will be cited for violations of (e)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1) and (h)(2) & (3).

On multi-employer worksites (MEW), the CSHO's [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] should refer to enforcement policies for MEW in the FIRM. Employers on such sites
who do not use hazardouschemicals but whose employees are
exposed to the chemicals used by other employers are required to have a program and train their employees on the hazards of the chemicals in the work areas. If an employer fails to comply with this, the employer should be cited for paragraphs (e)(1) and appropriate sections of (h). Paragraph (e)(2) is used to cite employers on MEW who have a program but have failed to include the methods to be used to provide other employers on-site access to MSDSs, labeling systems used in the workplace, or to explain the precautionary measures which need to be
taken to protect other employees on the worksite.

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall determine that containers are labeled, that the labels are
legible, and that the labels are prominently displayed.

Labels must be in English. Labels and MSDS's may also be printed in additional languages.

The CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] shall determine whether the label identity can be cross-referenced with the MSDS and the list of hazardouschemicals.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] must consider alternate labeling provisions (for example tags or
markings) for containers which are of unusual shape or proportion and do not easily accommodate a legible label.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall evaluate the effectiveness of in-plant labeling systems through a review of the employer's training program and MSDS procedures. Such evaluation shall include interviews with employees to determine their familiarity with the hazards associated with chemicals in their workplace. An effective labeling system is one that ensures that employees are aware of the hazardous effects (including target organ effects) of the chemicals to which they are potentially exposed. (See
Appendix A for a discussion of effective labeling systems.)

Guidelines for referrals regarding inadequate labels are dealt with in this
instruction, see paragraph E.1.d.

No citations shall be issued on paragraph (f)(11). An indefinite stay-of-enforcement has been placed on the requirement that manufacturers update label information within 90 days of becoming aware of
significant information regarding the hazards of the chemical. OSHA
will alert the regulated community at the time that the stay is lifted.

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall evaluate the compliance status of this
provision by examining a sample of MSDSs to determine that the MSDSs have been obtained or developed and prepared in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (g)(2)-(5) of the standard and to ensure that the information regarding the health and physical hazards is accurate. If MSDSs are not updated when new information becomes available, the initial hazard determination performed by the chemicalmanufacturer or importer is deficient.

The CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] is to complete this review by following the procedures
outlined in Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Appendix C, of this instruction. The CSHO shall also use available literature and computer
references in the Area Office as well as Appendix D, Guide to Reviewing MSDS Completeness, in reviewing MSDS.

Does each MSDS contain information which adequately addresses at least [Emphasis ours - ILPI] the 12 elements required by the standard at (g)(2)(i)-(xii)?

Are all sections of the MSDS accurately completed?

The CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] shall ensure compliance with the MSDS transmission
provisions of the standard by reviewing the chemical manufacturer's, importer's, or distributor's program for transmitting the MSDSs (including updated MSDSs) to downstream customers.

The following procedures apply in situations where the employer's
MSDS/label is inadequate or deficient and the employer relied upon the information supplied by chemical manufacturer or importer:

Employers are not to be held responsible for inaccurate information on
the MSDS/label which they did not prepare and they have accepted in good faith from the chemical manufacturer, importer, or distributor.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall take copies of any MSDS/label with inaccurate or deficient information back to the Area Office for referral to the appropriate State Plan State or Area Office.

The Area Office within whose jurisdiction the upstream supplier or
manufacturer is located shall then ensure that referral procedures outlined herein are followed. State Plan States shall follow referral procedures as required by the State.

The Area Office or State Plan State to which the referral was made
shall notify the referring office of the outcome of the referral.

Area Offices should expect to receive requests from employers to
assist them in obtaining MSDS or labels in situations when an inspection has not been conducted. If the Area Director determines that the employer has tried to obtain the information, and has not been able to do so, a letter and/or telephone call from the Area Office to the
supplier or manufacturer is the appropriate action in this situation.

In the event that the CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] needs MSDS information quickly as part of a current inspection, he/she may contact the manufacturer directly prior to making the referral to the AO in whose jurisdiction the manufacturer is located.

Referral Procedures for Distributors. When a distributor has not received an MSDS from the supplier, the CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] shall recommend that the distributor write to the chemicalmanufacturer or supplier of the chemical. If the distributor fails to receive the MSDS within a reasonable period of time, for example, five working days, the Area Director shall follow the referral procedures outlined herein.

Citations shall be issued to the employer only when MSDSs or labels are missing. Citations to manufacturer or importers for incomplete or inaccurate MSDSs or labels shall include an abatement requirement for the transmittal of corrected MSDSs or labels to all customers with the next shipment of the chemical.

If MSDS or labels are missing or have not been received, the employer shall be cited unless a good faith effort has been made to obtain the information.

If a citation is issued to the employer for lack of an MSDS/label and the
employer has failed to document that a good faith effort has been made to obtain them, CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall recommend that the employer write to both the supplier (distributor) and to the manufacturer for the MSDS or label.

Any party who changes the label or MSDS (for example, changing the name or identity of the chemical) becomes the responsible party for the change regardless of whether they are a chemical manufacturer, distributor or employer. [Emphasis ours - ILPI] Where a distributor adds its name to an MSDS or label which is inaccurate or incomplete, but makes no other changes to the information on the data sheet or label, citations shall not be issued to the distributor. Distributors, however, who substitute their names on the MSDS or change it in any way become the "responsible party" and must be able to supply the required additional information on the hazardous chemical and appropriate emergency procedures, if
necessary. [Emphasis ours - ILPI] Failure to provide the additional information will result in a violation of (g)(2)(xii) of the standard if noted upon inspection.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] shall cite (g)(1) whenever an inspection reveals that an employer does not have an MSDS. If an employer possesses an MSDS but it is not readily accessible to employees while in their work area, then a violation of (g)(8) shall be cited. Violations of (g)(8) shall also be cited when an employer using electronic access as an integral part of the hazard communication program does not have an adequate back-up system to address emergency situations.

On MEW (multi-employer workplaces), citations for violations of (g)(8) of the standard shall be issued to the employer responsible for making the MSDS(s) readily accessible, as discussed below. A citation for violation of (e)(2)(i) shall be issued if an employer fails to include the methods by which the employer will inform other employers about on-site access to data sheets.

For example, if an employer on a multi-employer worksite brings hazardous chemicals onto that site and fails to inform other employers about the presence of those chemicals and/or the availability of the MSDS(s), that employer shall be cited for violation of (g)(8) grouped
with (e)(2)(i).

Controlling Employer. If the employer uses a general contractor or other employer as an intermediary for storage of the MSDS(s), and that intermediate employer has agreed to hold and provide ready access to the MSDS(s), then the intermediate employer becomes the controlling employer, and is responsible for ensuring the availability of the MSDS(s).

The controlling employer (e.g., general contractor) shall, therefore, normally be cited for violation of (g)(8) if the MSDS(s) are not
available; however:

If the MSDS(s) are not available because the subcontractor failed to
make them readily accessible, then the subcontractor shall be cited for violation of (g)(8).

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Training programs must be evaluated through program review and discussion with management and employees.

Employee interviews will provide general information to the CSHO
[Compliance Safety and Health Officer] regarding the training program. It cannot be expected that employees will recall all information provided in the training and be able to repeat it. Employees must be aware of the hazards to which they are exposed, know how to obtain and use information on labels and MSDSs, and know and follow appropriate work practices. If the CSHO detects a trend in employee responses that indicates training is not being conducted, or is conducted in a cursory fashion that does not meet the intent of the standard, a closer review of the written program and its implementation may be necessary. The following questions may be used by the CSHO in determining the adequacy of the training program:

Has a training and information program been established for employees
exposed to hazardouschemicals?

Is this training provided at the time of initial assignment and whenever a
new hazard is introduced into work areas?

Have all new employees at this location received training equivalent to
the required initial assignment training?

If electronic access to MSDSsis being used at a workplace, have employees been adequately trained to retrieve the information?

Paragraph (h) requires that information and training be provided to employees regarding the hazards of all chemicals in their work areas including by-products and hazardouschemicals
introduced by another employer, provided that they are known to be present in such a manner that employees may be exposed under normal conditions of use or in a foreseeable emergency.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] should determine if employees are employed by outside contractors (such as temporary employment agencies) or the inspected employer. (For guidance concerning an employer's responsibility for training temporary employees, see Appendix A.) To establish if an employer-employee relationship exists, the CSHO should determine the following:

Create a culture of safety in your workplace with safety scoreboards from Safety Emporium.

Who controls the manner and means by which work is accomplished?

Who supervises/evaluates the work quality?

What and where is the location of the work?

Who determines the worker's schedule? (Time of arrival/days
worked?)

Who provides required instruments, tools, and equipment?

What is the history and duration of the relationship between the parties?

To what extent can the client/host employer choose a particular
worker?

Who has the right to assign new projects to the worker?

What is the extent of the party's control over when and how long the
employee works?

If no form of employee training has been provided, citations shall be issued under (h)(1). Citations shall be issued under paragraph (h)(2) and (h)(3) of the standard, as appropriate, if there is a deficiency in an otherwise existing program. The employer is always ultimately responsible for ensuring that employees are adequately trained, regardless of the method relied upon to comply with the training requirements.

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

CSHOs [Compliance Safety and Health Officers] evaluating MSDS and hazard determination
programs may request disclosure of trade secret identities under paragraph
(i)(12) of the HCS. OSHA shall take all steps feasible to protect trade secret identities, including secure filing and return of information when its use is complete.

Non-emergencies. Health professionals are entitled to trade secret information when providing medical or other occupational health services to exposed employees. Likewise, the employees themselves and/or their designated representatives are entitled to trade secret
information. If these individuals are denied access to trade secret information, the matter may be referred to OSHA for enforcement proceedings.

As stipulated in the standard, OSHA should receive from the referring health professional, employee, or designated representative a copy of the written request for the trade secret information, as well as a copy of the written denial provided by the holder of the trade secret. These two written documents shall be reviewed by the Area Director to
determine the validity of the request and the trade secret claim. The Regional Solicitor may be consulted to provide assistance in this regard.

If the Area Director does not believe that there is enough information
upon which to base a decision, he/she may contact either the trade secret requester or the trade secret holder for further information. Such requests shall be documented in the case file.

Medical emergencies. The HCS permits a treating physician or nurse to designate the existence of a medical emergency requiring the immediate disclosure of trade secrets. Referrals received from treating physicians and nurses relating to a medical emergency shall normally be classified as imminent danger or serious in accordance with the FIRM. Due to the potential risk to life and/or health, the Area Director shall ensure that these referrals are processed as soon as received. The Area Director or his/her designee shall contact the manufacturer of the chemical
by telephone. Telephone numbers are required on the MSDS. The manufacturer shall be informed of the standard's requirements and requested to immediately provide the needed information directly to the treating physician or nurse

Non-emergencies. In response to non-emergencies, where OSHA believes that the chemicalmanufacturer, importer or employer will not
be able to support the trade secret claim, the withholding of a specific chemical identity shall be cited as a violation of paragraph (g)(2). Where OSHA does not question the claim that a specific chemical identity is a trade secret, but the employer has failed to comply with paragraph (i)(1)(i), (ii), (iii) or (iv), or with (i)(2) or (i)(3), such failure
shall be grouped with 1910.1200(g)(2), stating the deficiency in the AVD. For example, the employer claims a trade secret exists but failed to indicate on the MSDS that the specific chemical was being withheld for that reason, as required under paragraph (i)(1)(iii).

Medical emergencies. For medical emergencies, failure to disclose the
information shall result in the issuance of a willful citation, if the elements of a willful citation can be established. The chemicalmanufacturer
will frequently be located under a different Area Office jurisdiction. Apparent violations shall be referred to the office of jurisdiction for investigation and the issuance of citations. Concurrently, the Area Director of jurisdiction shall coordinate obtaining an administrative subpoena ordering the immediate disclosure of the needed information. Federal Court Orders shall be sought immediately if the administrative subpoena is not effective in obtaining the information.

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Citations for violations of paragraphs (e), (f), (g) and (h) of the standard shall be issued
as separate items only when there is a pervasive lack of compliance with the Hazard Communication Standard. Otherwise specific guidance in this instruction shall be followed.

Generally HCS violations shall be classified as non-serious. Serious violations shall be issued only when the deficiency can contribute to a potential exposure capable of causing death or serious physical harm. In addition, the CSHO [Compliance Safety and Health Officer] must document that the employer knew or should have known of the violation.

"Material safety data sheets and paragraph (c)(5)(iv) records concerning the identity of a substance or agent need not be retained for any specified period as long as some record of the identity (chemical
name or trade name, if known) of the substance or agent, where it was used, and when it was used is retained for at least thirty (30) years."

Employers might simplify their responsibilities as they relate to the overlap
between these two standards by incorporating the requirements under 29 CFR
1910.1020(d)(1)(ii)(B) with those for the HCS paragraph (e)(1)(i). That is, the list of hazardouschemicals
could include information on where chemicals were used and when they were used. These lists would then have to be kept for at least 30 years.

Section (e)(4) of the HCS requires employers to make the written hazard communication program available upon request to employees, their representatives, OSHA
or NIOSH, in accordance with the requirements at 1910.1020(e). The standard, 1910.1020(e), requires the employer to provide a copy of the requested record (in this case, a copy of the written hazard communication program) "in a reasonable time...but in no event later than fifteen (15) days...." Some employers have incorrectly interpreted this to mean that they have 15 days to produce a copy of the written program and make it available at the worksite. The intent behind the (e)(4) requirements of the HCS is to allow the employer up to 15 days to provide a written (photo or other) copy of the program to employees who request it. This does not mean the employer has 15 days in which to get the program to the worksite for employees to access. The written program must be available to employees at the worksite at all times, as per 1910.1200 (e)(1).

Take care of your OSHA 300 obligations with this handy record keeping center from Safety Emporium.

29 CFR 1910.1450, Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories.
Quality control laboratories are usually adjuncts of production operations and are not covered under the Laboratory Standard, but are covered under the HCS. For laboratories covered under the Laboratory Standard, the requirements of the HCS are superseded (the more specific standard, 1910.1450, takes precedence). Both the training and information and the hazard identification requirements of the Laboratory
Standard are more extensive than the HCS laboratory requirements.

This version of the inspection procedures for the OSHA HazCom Standard is no longer valid. It is presented here solely for historical purposes and has been replaced by CPL 02-02-079 effective July 9, 2015.

Entry last updated: Saturday, June 11, 2016.
This hypermarked and content-enhanced page is copyright 2001-2019 by ILPI, all rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or posting on other web sites is expressly prohibited. For questions, comments and concerns, please contact us at our MSDS email address.