Shashi Tharoor, a former UN under-secretary-general and former Indian Minister of State for Human Resource Development and Minister of State for External Affairs, is currently an MP for the Indian National Congress and Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs. He is the author of Pax Indica: India and the World of the 21st Century.

2. The 5 examples laid out in the article lead up to a forced choice in thinking that “proves” that you’re either scientific or you’re not. I will not even have to address the fallacious nature of how five quotes from four individuals can be generalized to billions of BJP members.

Doesn't the US and many other European nations have a religion that could be framed anti-scientific as well? Adam/Eve is not a part of the evolutionary story, just in case you did not know, and these countries still support scientific endeavors. This proves there is no forced choice.Thanks for reading. But hey, does logic even matter to someone in Congress trying to bash the BJP before critical elections?

This proves the whole conclusion and basis for the list of examples in the article are flawed.The author created a false dichotomy that is not scientific.The article itself is non-scientific.

Mod supports science. He actually believes that science will help save India.What about the polar moon landings? Is that no part of scientific space exploration?There is no forced choice, just bad thinkers.This article is spawned from the biased reporting you can find in Science Magazine. If you look over their reporting, you’ll find that 9 of the recent 15 articles about Modi and the BJP are negative. Will we hear from Pallava Bagla next week? He’s really intimidated by Modi. We understand.

I admire Mr. Tharoor a lot and follow him closely and read some of his books. This is a political article which just picks some points to create a negative narrative of the BJP. For example, what he does not say is that it was the "anti-science" BJP government of Mr. Vajpayee that sanctioned India's successful Lunar mission. Science is something like nuclear physics that can proven. Darwin did not prove the "Theory" of Evolution. It is the best explanation to date of life on earth. I wish Mr. Tharoor was in the BJP so that his opinions were more genuine when he did not have to defend the stupid congress party through his writings.

I admire Mr. Shashi Tharoor a lot and follow him closely and read some of his books. This is a political article which just picks some points to create a negative narrative of the BJP. For example, what he does not say is that it was the "anti-science" BJP government of Mr. Vajpayee that sanctioned India's successful Lunar mission. Science is something like nuclear physics that can proven. Darwin did not prove the "Theory" of Evolution. It is the best explanation to date of life on earth. I wish Mr. Tharoor was in the BJP so that his opinions were more genuine when he did not have to defend the stupid congress party through his writings.

Shashi Tharoor is appalled at the "war on science" in India waged by the ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, BJP. Last month, Satyapal Singh, India's minister for higher education has been condemned by scientists for demanding that Darwin's theory of evolution be removed from school curricula because “nobody, including our ancestors, have said or written that they ever saw an ape turning into a human being,” he said. The author says, even Prime Minister Narendra Modi "has joined the assault on science." In 2014, at the inauguration of a Mumbai hospital, he merged myth with reality, claiming "the elephant-headed Hindu god Ganesh was proof of ancient India’s knowledge of plastic surgery," which together with reproductive genetics were practiced thousands of years ago. While Modi was chief minister of Gujarat state, he also said that the Hindu God Rama flew the first airplane and that stem cell technology was known in ancient India. No scientist in India had dared to challenge his views. In 2013 Modi portrayed himself "as a technologically savvy twenty-first-century leader" during the 103rd edition of the Indian Science Congress. He called on scientists to keep the economy, environment, energy, empathy and equity at the heart of their endeavors in the interest of impactful science. They needed to find cost effective and efficient solutions, display empathy by ensuring that “efforts are in tune with culture, circumstances and social challenges.” Hindu nationalists have long propagated their belief that ancient India scholars were behind many discoveries that helped shape modern science, like astronomy and mathematics including the invention of the concept of zero. But religious figures of the BJP have been accused in recent years of enforcing “ideological science” - in defiance of India's founder, Jawaharlal Nehru, who made science and technology as key to economic development - the top priority for all governments. The author highlights a litany of ludicrous episodes that illustrate how members of the ruling party reject science. This quandary gives rise to a "gaggle of gurus who have turned religion and pseudo-spirituality into a lucrative business in India," that exploits the gullibility of the unwitting masses. This "war on science" will only impede scientific development at a vulnerable moment when India seeks to become an economically developed country in the coming years. Soon India will overtake China as the world's most populous country and its demography - a very young population - has an edge over an aging workforce in China. Abdul Kalam, India's president from 2002 to 2007 believed nearly a quarter of the country's population could be lifted out of poverty if the government continued to back science and technology as a source of growth. Looking over its north-eastern border, India feels the challenge from China, which is India's rival for political influence in the region. Kalam, an aeronautical engineer and father to the country's missile programme before he went into politics had a message that should serve the ruling party as a guidance. He believed that an evolved, enlightened society - based on Indian ideas - could lead to "a peaceful, prosperous and happy planet." His philosophy was a "three-dimensional approach, involving education with a value system, religion transforming into spirituality, and the most important, economic development for societal transformation in all the nations."

THE RELIGIOSITY OF SECULAR DEMOCRATSFundamentalism has flaws not in Hinduism alone - but have yet to come across the Author's analysis of flaws in the Two Global Religions, that appear to be his benefactors. Always apologetic, as if Dynasty was foisted by The Two that are flawless. There is a Third Global Religion - that flourished in The East with its Fountainhead in India. The Buddha found the answers to the insidious Caste Chemistry - but The First Family's Caste Chemistry precludes proliferation of the virtues of Buddhism, given their bellicose apathy towards Hinduism. The alternative narrative of The Buddha just doesn't seem to provide them succour.

Religiosity is a curse - it's fundamentalism can't be condoned - yet incredulous that the Intellectual credentials of The Party that ruled India for Seven Decades, stands exposed as mere brokers for Two Global Religions in the garb of Secular Democracy.

Why is Tharoor invoking Mrs Gandhi's dictatorial 42nd Amendment which introduced the fatuous and non justiciable notion of 'fundamental duties'? Is it because he thinks his blind devotion to the Dynasty is the mark of a 'scientific temper'? By linking the evil 42nd Amendment to Nehru- who, whatever his faults, hadn't jailed his opponents and hamstrung the judiciary- Tharoor is being a tad 'over zealous'. The fact is Indira herself repented that folly and Rajiv and Sonia and Rahul haven't mentioned it since. Tharoor, for some reason, feels now is the time to say that the dictatorial Indira of 1976 was on the right track. If Congress ever gets back into power it must ensure it stays in office by strong arm methods. Tharoor may genuinely believe that a 'Presidential' system- of the sort mooted at that time- will better serve the dynasty and its votaries. However, he should be careful. The dynasty has a history of passing all blame to 'overzealous' underlings- like him.

What war against Science is there or has there been in India? None at all. There always have been and there always will be some politicians belonging to the ruling party who will seek to curry favour with religious voting blocks. But this doesn't change anything at all.By contrast, there was a War against democracy and the rule of law in 1976 which is commemorated in the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution which Tharoor quotes in this article. Indira said she wasn't responsible for that war- it was some 'overzealous' people. But such zealots, it seems, the Dynasty will always have with it.

Nehru was wrong about the Soviet Union. He did not understand that the 'scientific temper' of the Soviet citizen was not 'the temper of a free man'- rather it was accompanied by an active terror of a mid-night arrest and long years in the Gulag. Why is Tharoor quoting Nehru in this context? Is it not to show that Nehru was a fool who said foolish things while Indira was smart because she changed the Constitution so that she could just jail anyone who spoke against her?

Tharoor has referred to a Televised answer that Modi gave to a young student from Assam. The Youtube video is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-LtP3oqAg8. Modi says that human beings have changed- they have stopped respecting the Environment and are exploiting it in a greedy fashion. Humanity has to change its habits. If we treat the Environment with love, it will not continue to change in an adverse manner to human life. Modi is an entertaining and impressive speaker. He did not say 'climate change is not an environmental problem'. He said we have to change the way we relate to Nature as individuals, as families, as communities.

Modi's view is sensible. A top-down 'Nehruvian' solution will cost a lot and achieve less than nothing. The way forward must be subsidiarity based and involve a holistic type of thinking. Tharoor, it seems, wants a return to the terror of 1976 when votaries of the dynasty could do what they liked in the name of 'Secular, Scientific, Socialism'. More particularly, since Indira Gandhi had, quite notoriously, identified poor people as the major cause of environmental degradation in India, it licensed the use of Nazi tactics against the great mass of the Indian people. It was in that context that Modi's own R.S.S gained renown as offering resistance to the triple threat that Tharoor's 'scientific temper' poses to the people of India- viz. that the Dynasty will once again assault the fundamental rights of the citizen while destroying the environment and plundering the economy.

What comes out of other aperture of cow is green house gases that is destroying the earth? Unfortunately, barbaric races in the west and middle east who are not yet out of their hunter-gatherer phases in human evolution love gorging on their meat like animals. To satisfy such desires, they breed millions of cows and other animals and destroy the earth in the process. When they are called out, they turn to those who are higher in the evolution scale to be actual culprits. This is just like Hitler criticizing Gandhi for having "primitive" thoughts like non-violence.

Historically, decision making in Pakistan has tended to be smarter and more pragmatic than in India. The Indian loves trying to show himself morally superior by acting like a lunatic. The word 'sauda' (also present in Spanish and Portuguese as 'saudosismo') has the meaning of 'black bile causing melancholy mental illness' as well as 'profitable'. Pakistan, no doubt, has made mistakes but at least one can find a rational- or at least mercenary- explanation for these missteps. India, by contrast, will never lack St. Stephens Graduates doing crazy shit. Come to think of it, Gen. Zia was a Stephanian...

PAKISTAN HITS BULLSEYEThere they go again - Congress cannot change.The Congress Caste Chemistry allied with Global Sectarian Forces.Attacking India's Religion - finding faults on behalf of other Religions.As brokers for Global Religions - The Congress can never see faults in them.The Author's preference for chastising The Cowboys - for fundamentalism.All Religions equally to blame for respective fundamentalism - can't be condoned.But Tharoor and his Congress seem obsessed - exposing their 70 year mind set.For all to see - why India had no chance against China, with Leadership like this.Pakistan has a challenge - to find better protagonists to slay Hinduism.In Tharoor and the Party that ruled India for 70 years - Pakistan's hit bullseye.

Enough is enough!! I have seen enough of Congress politicians (Congress is the party in opposition in the Indian parliament) of which Shashi Tharoor is one, who would use global platforms to spread misinformation about the ground situation in India. For shouting out loud, Congress, when it was in power in India for most of India's independence heavily undermined science and scientific research by giving a pittance, as a percentage of GDP, to scientific research and majorly screwing up administration in premier scientific institutions by appointing lackeys as heads who would do the congress political favors. They have done more harm to science than anyone can fathom. It is rich of Shashi Tharoor to come back and accuse BJP of waging a war on science when they are taking genuine efforts to improve the condition of scientific establishment in India. Besides, the minister did not say he rejects theory of evolution based on religious beliefs because he is a Hindu and some of the several contradictory Hindu religious beliefs are actually in line with evolution which Tharoor has himself mentioned in his latest book "Why I am Hindu". He said he is up for a debate about the validity of evolution and is ready to accept on the basis of solid evidence in favor of evolution. isn't that scientific temperament. To question and look for evidence is everyone's right. Otherwise, scientific establishments are heading to become global hegemons. I would request this website to please give at least a disclaimer before giving a platform to a political opportunist like Tharoor. It will do the rest of the world a favor.

Sciences is in trouble . The attack however, is not confined to one political party, though one finds an aggravating assault which makes us hang our heads in shame .... needless to say we in india are becoming a laughing stock for the world . Recently in the literate and aware kerala a politician made a claim that the Japanese are funding drinking water supply in the state only this will ensure cloud formation over western ghats which could be carried to Japanese coasts and improve precipitation there . What ridiculous stuff . I hope the scientists do a “ man ke bath “ for the political leadership in the country first . Pl give it a serious thought

New Comment

Pin comment to this paragraph

After posting your comment, you’ll have a ten-minute window to make any edits. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.

Log in/Register

Please log in or register to continue. Registration is free and requires only your email address.

Log in

Register

Emailrequired

PasswordrequiredRemember me?

Please enter your email address and click on the reset-password button. If your email exists in our system, we'll send you an email with a link to reset your password. Please note that the link will expire twenty-four hours after the email is sent. If you can't find this email, please check your spam folder.