I believe if you do the math, to make a $100 million paving job work...you’d have to figure in an extra $5 millon on top of the bond pay-back....because of your rating. Maybe it doesn’t matter to most folks in Illinois...but it means every single infrastructure job that you fund via bonds...means more taxes down the line in some fashion. Either you the business owner gets hit, or you the wealthy property owner, or you the company with a thousand employees.

The question I have...how would you ever get out of such a mess? If you chase your business operations off to Texas, and they won’t return...you end up looking like Paraguay in ten years...a third-world state.

The cesspool that spawned Obama’s political career. What does that tell you? Now Obama wants to make Illinois dysfunctionality nationwide. I know 90% of Illinois Democrat criminality is in Chicago and the suburban and rural people cannot outvote that puss dripping sore

8
posted on 01/26/2013 10:08:53 AM PST
by dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)

All that crapola from Illinois Dem pols against WI. Gov Scott Walker certainly makes them look like the fools they truly are as their state crumbles down even further while under their domain. Look in the mirror first next time you lieberal dolts at the facts.

I believe if you do the math, to make a $100 million paving job work...youd have to figure in an extra $5 millon on top of the bond pay-back....because of your rating.

If the state constitution specified that, outside a few specific situations, the state or subdivisions thereof would always be free to default on debt with no recourse for the creditor except for specific property which was named as collateral for the debt, certain types of credit would have cost more but the state would be in much better financial shape. If a city needs to build a school, for example, and needs to borrow money to pay half the cost, creditors would face the risk that if the value of the building to the city's taxpayers were to fall below the value of the outstanding debt, they might be left having to try to salvage what value they they could from the building, likely taking a loss. Creditors wouldn't let the city borrow money in ways that would be overly detrimental to future taxpayers, since the risk inherent in such lending would exceed any possible payoff (the higher the interest rate, the greater the risk of default).

Schadenfreude. Payback’s a female dog. It sounds as if the cycle of communism is nearly complete there in the land of the leftists. They’ve gone straight to the poverty, crime, and starvation part. Pretty soon that cow will go udderly ;-) dry, and they’ll have to take over San Francisco or someplace where there are still people with a few dollars to rob.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.