A New Vaccine called “Gardasil” is out on the Market: For Whose Sake?

It took 28,000 deaths before Pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co had to remove their arthritis drug VIOXX off the counters. They saw their market stocks plummet close to 27%, and they were fighting hard to keep themselves from falling further. Over 4,000 law suits were keeping them busy in the courts, while their scientists were manufacturing a new drug.

A new vaccine called “Gardasil” is out on the market. Manufactured by this same company, quickly fast tracked by the FDA in February 2006, and approved in September in the United States without many years of research or medical support behind it. Don’t you find it interesting that two of Merck’s own former biologists, Vaccine expert Dr. John Boslego and Alan Shaw, sat on this FDA panel that just happened to approve this Merck vaccine?

So far, they have documented 3 deaths and over 1,700 severe adverse reactions to it, and this vaccine was approved within the last year.

Texas Governor Rick Perry, at that time, passed an executive order mandating all girls to be vaccinated before they entered grade 6. The rush to make a new vaccine mandatory created a backlash from the people and forced Merck, on February 20th, to publicly drop its lobbying campaign for mandatory vaccination of school girls.

According to a 2002 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, “The safety of new agents cannot be known with certainty until a drug has been on the market for years. Serious adverse drug reactions commonly emerge after Food and Drug Administration approval.”

In Canada they have started the Gardasil inoculation in PEI and Nova Scotia. The Harper government is spending $300 million to support our Canadian daughters to have this vaccine.

I decided to do some more research, before I allowed my daughter to be vaccinated three times to ensure this live vaccine is in her body. They claim it will protect against just two of over 100 of the human papilloma virus (HPV) strains that cause up to 70 percent of cervical cancers. Their own experts are now saying that girls and women may have to be inoculated once again in five years time as they are still unsure on how long this vaccine will stay effective.

They want our daughters – as young as 12 years of age – to be inoculated for a cancer they claim is spread through sexual intercourse.

Why now? Why are only the girls being inoculated?

There is a lot of money being poured into advertising on television with cute little songs that are attempting to convince the general public that they need to rush out and get their daughters and themselves inoculated.

Commonly known Pap tests are still the best way to catch signs of cancer when it is still treatable.

Please, my fellow Canadians, research this before you allow your children to be vaccinated with this!

CAP/PAC demands a halt to this medical experimentation on our little girls!!

Further CAP/PAC deplores this aspect of the implementation of a North American Union agenda that submits Canadians to the profit motivated exploitation of phamaceutical companies, at the expense of the safety and health of our citizens.

Parents mustrefuse to submit their daughters to a real health risk. No one has the right to abuse a human body without the owner’s informed consent. Children need our protection, not exploitation. Parents need to know they can and must say no.”

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the
copyright owner.