Sure, but it's not two of the LS7 2.205" intake valves, they are two of the much smaller 1.70" intake valves. Interesting what the total volume would be. I was thinking the flows would have been in the low 400cfm's like some of the modern Hemi heads or something.

This illustrates the benefits of being able to rev well beyond 7000 RPM comfortably without concerns about valvetrain stability.
That 750 crank horsepower is a result of an engine that is revving to 7500+ to make that 750 crank horsepower without valve train deflection or crazy big cam shaft profiles.

Sure, but it's not two of the LS7 2.205" intake valves, they are two of the much smaller 1.70" intake valves. Interesting what the total volume would be. I was thinking the flows would have been in the low 400cfm's like some of the modern Hemi heads or something.

Again, 2 (two) 1.7 valves, thats 2.4 total area and a smaller valve will increase port velocity which equals torque so 2 smaller ports and 2 smaller valves will easily outflow a larger single port/valve. The mid lift numbers, where you are 90% of the time would also be far better than the single port and I'd bet its capable of well over 400cfm.

Modern HEMIS are in the 390's also with the 5.7 Eagle head being the best of the non SRT heads. The SRT 6.2/6.4 heads flow slightly better

Again, 2 (two) 1.7 valves, thats 2.4 total area and a smaller valve will increase port velocity which equals torque so 2 smaller ports and 2 smaller valves will easily outflow a larger single port/valve. The mid lift numbers, where you are 90% of the time would also be far better than the single port and I'd bet its capable of well over 400cfm.

That is my entire point - I would have thought they would have flowed greater, too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Millenium Z06

Modern HEMIS are in the 390's also with the 5.7 Eagle head being the best of the non SRT heads. The SRT 6.2/6.4 heads flow slightly better

Your numbers are a little high, not sure where you are getting those from? Even the Apache heads don't come close the LS7 cylinder head flows. I'm still of the impression the LS7 cylinder heads offer the greatest flows from a production cylinder head. How many production cylinder heads are CNC'd from the factory, and of those, how many of those have Ti valves?

Quote:

Dodge now offers four different Hemi heads, the early 5.7 (like the ones we tested), the 6.1, the later 5.7 Eagle, and the 6.4 Apache heads. The early 5.7 heads we tested, offered the lowest stock flow-rates of the bunch, topping out at 269 cfm at .700-inch lift. All of the later heads offer significantly more flow in as-cast form, with each easily exceeding 300 cfm. Flow numbers for the 6.4 Apache heads are said to reach 340 cfm, a big number even for ported 5.7 heads, as our ported early castings from Total Engine Airflow (TEA) checked in at 329 cfm. The improvement in airflow offered by the porting from TEA was significant, as the ported heads flow enough to support over 650 horsepower. The question now was; would the mild engine be able to take advantage of the extra head flow when it was making only 400 horsepower? The answer was not really, as the stock heads were already sufficient to support the current power level. The ported heads improved the power output slightly, to 413 horsepower at 5,700 rpm, and 439 lb-ft of torque at 4,600 rpm, but it was another case of the mild combination holding the heads back. The results would change in test two.