*We should discuss the GPC "Chair" based on discussions at the Summit in DC. I am willing to take this on, but we can discuss further on the next call. (Brad)

+

**Next phase?

−

+

***It seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.

**[[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?

+

−

+

−

*Releases translation process

+

−

**Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?

+

−

**Define process only for docs or also tools?

+

−

+

−

----

+

−

+

−

*Project Reviewers,

+

−

**In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|first straw of the page]] to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers.

+

−

***Please check it out and let me know if you think any changes have to be made.

+

−

***Also, it seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.

+

−

***If you agree with this methodology I ask if one of you have the spare cycles to produce the above referred job description. Later on a text to support the call for reviewers will also be needed - I will produce a first draft for your comments if nobody assumes first the task.

Agenda

Current Meeting

It seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.