If only terrorists would be so accommodating as not to change
cell phones, the new curbs on the Patriot Act being pushed by Democrats in
Congress would not be so dangerous. But, unfortunately, even a book titled
"Terrorism for Dummies" would tell them to use multiple cell phones to plot
their mayhem.

In the aftermath of Oklahoma City, President Clinton asked
Congress for authority to order roving wiretaps, targeting the terror
suspect rather than one specific phone. If he changed phones, the FBI could
tap each new phone he used without getting a separate warrant. Congress
unwisely and unaccountably refused. But when President Bush renewed the
request, after 9-11, Congress included the authorization in the PATRIOT Act.
But this provision and many other essential investigatory tools is subject
to sunset at the end of the year. Unless affirmatively renewed by Congress,
they will lapse.

Drug enforcement agents have long used roving wiretaps, but
anti-terror investigators will not be able to use them if Congress doesn't
extend the authority. Our anti-terror investigators will be back to the one
phone-one warrant rule.

Former Bush Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, writing in an
op-ed in Friday's Wall Street Journal, notes that roving wiretaps "helped
thwart a plot earlier this year to blow up synagogues in Riverdale, N.Y."
Yet liberal Democrats are fighting the renewal of the roving wiretap
authority as part of a broad offensive against the very PATRIOT Act
provisions that have kept us safe (often by narrow margins) since 9-11.

Other liberal targets include the statute that allows terror
investigators to apply for court orders to search business records in
national security investigations. The Democrats want to limit this authority
to instances in which investigators can prove that their target is an agent
of a foreign power.

Since terrorists are unlikely to register under FARA (Foreign
Agent Registration Act), one wonders how investigators are supposed to be
able to prove that they are foreign agents before they can investigate them!
Even though investigators can only search the business records if they get
the approval of the court, this safeguard does not impress the liberals.

Ironically, the IRS can access these very same business records
if they are connected with a tax investigation whether or not a foreign
agent is involved. But terror investigators will have to face a more
daunting hurdle.

Another sunsetting provision under attack is the so-called "lone
wolf authority," which allows investigators to launch a probe even if they
cannot prove, before they start, that the target is connected to a terrorist
group. Again, the liberals would put the horse before the cart and demand
proof before an inquiry could begin.

Other liberal targets include limiting the use of National
Security Letters -- in effect, subpoenas -- in terror investigations.

The fact is that there has not been a single instance of
reported abuse of these investigative powers by counter-terrorist agents. No
records have even been turned over to other government agencies like the IRS
or the DEA. No leaks have appeared in the media. No citizen's privacy has
been compromised by publication of his secrets in the newspapers.

On the other hand, the list of terror attacks that have been
prevented by using these authorities is extensive. Most recently, these
tools helped stop Najibullah Zazi from loading backpacks with lethal
explosives and detonating them on New York City subways.

Will Obama endorse these crippling amendments? Will Democrats
like Sens. Gillibrand and Schumer, who come from endangered states like New
York, back them?

Heaven help the Democratic Party and President Obama if these
debilitating amendments pass or if the authority to use this statute lapses
and another terrorist attack takes place! Heaven help the victims, too!