The price difference between 120hz to 240hz LCD TVs is at least a few hundred in the 46" range.

I understand there is a real difference between 120hz to 240hz in how fast it will refresh but for those of you who have (or had) both is it that noticeable in the "real world" watching sports\auto racing etc?

Yeah, when we replaced (let's call it) the wife's TV and went from 60 to 120 I noticed a big difference, now that we are in the market to replace "my" TV where I watch a lot of sports I was wondering if the same held true for 120 to 240 to justify the price increase or if it was just hyped science tech where you will never notice.

Yeah, when we replaced (let's call it) the wife's TV and went from 60 to 120 I noticed a big difference, now that we are in the market to replace "my" TV where I watch a lot of sports I was wondering if the same held true for 120 to 240 to justify the price increase or if it was just hyped science tech where you will never notice.

It'll be like when they make them refresh at 1,000 times per second,do you think your eyes will be able to tell that its so much better?

I have 2 55" lcds.One is a 120 and one is a 240 (bought them 2 years apart just FYI) and I honestly can't see the big deal.Maybe my eyes are old,or I'm just not watching the right stuff to make the difference clear cut.

"That's the reason my FFL team name is TrentGreenLeadBlock. When you see this mother****er coming around the corner on a block, put your children to bed and batten down the hatch on your girl's snatch, because the same power that destroys defenders can scar the minds of the youth and simultaneously impregnate any woman within sight, live or on television."

It'll be like when they make them refresh at 1,000 times per second,do you think your eyes will be able to tell that its so much better?

I have 2 55" lcds.One is a 120 and one is a 240 (bought them 2 years apart just FYI) and I honestly can't see the big deal.Maybe my eyes are old,or I'm just not watching the right stuff to make the difference clear cut.

You'd probably notice if you were watching 3D TV, which is where all of this is heading.

Anyone think these 3dhdtv's and 3dblurays are going to last? I saw one with avatar on it the other day, looked incredible. DIdn't need glasses

More and more films will be shot with 3D technology in the coming years and eventually, everything will be shot in 3D. There's a difference between shooting in 3D and shifting non-3D images to create a "stereo effect".

I have a 240 Hz TV, but there's really not much of a difference. The most important thing is to get a 120, not only for reduction in blur and judder (and better TVs have ways of mitigating this), but also to watch Blu-Ray in 24 FPS without the need for 3:2 pulldown.

More and more films will be shot with 3D technology in the coming years and eventually, everything will be shot in 3D. There's a difference between shooting in 3D and shifting non-3D images to create a "stereo effect".

Direct TV now can provide 3D images, so I do think it's the future.

That's pretty cool, looks like ill be spending more money in the future on electronics.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Sure-Oz could ****ing track anyone in the country via Twitter. Dude makes me scared to leave the house.

You'd probably notice if you were watching 3D TV, which is where all of this is heading.

Well, that and holographic TV.

Maybe,but I'm thinking the human eye would never see the difference between being refreshed 120 vs 240 a second.I'm not even sure the brain could process the difference in real time,but I'm always up for seeing something I don't fully undertand.