abstract

Three different optimization methods using genetic algorithms have been developed, aiming to achieve better aggressive intermediate turbine duct (ITD) performance. To overcome defects of simple genetic algorithms, a niche genetic algorithm is used, for its better adaptability to multi-peak function. These three methods are two-dimensional optimization for pursuing the highest static pressure coefficient; two-dimensional optimization via controlling static pressure coefficient; and a further three-dimensional optimization. The second method introduces a restrainer to make sure the maximum value of static pressure coefficient gradient less than a limitation. A simulation case, an ITD with eight struts, was implemented to demonstrate the capabilities of the presented optimization methods. Compared to the baseline ITD, the results show as follow. The first method obtains a best static pressure coefficient but a severe separation. The second optimization method with static pressure coefficient gradient control can definitely suppress separation in the ITD, the second method also obtains better static pressure coefficient and the lowest total pressure loss coefficient. The third method, a further three-dimensional optimization can obtain better ITD overall performance because of a more realistic simulation. Nevertheless, the second two-dimensional optimization method can get good enough results while it is apparently much more time-saving compared to three-dimensional one, which make it more suitable for engineering applications.

Shibboleth is an access management service that provides single sign-on protected resources.
It replaces the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session.
It operates independently of a user's location or IP address.
If your institution uses Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.