David Chadd commented on the selections via conference call late Monday night:

On Castellanos he said that the toolset and package was “impossible to pass up at 44”

Chadd saw Ruffin twice and he dominated both times and agreed with the comparisons to Huston Street

Chadd said that Castellanos has plus hittability and he thinks that plus power will develop. His toolset is “polished.” He will move to third base for the Tigers.

Ruffin could start at a higher level due to advanced pitchability

Castellanos’ family has ties to Detroit

Chadd once again talked about the support that he has from Mike Ilitch and Dave Dombrowski to draft the best player available. Chadd woudn’t say where he had Castellanos ranked on his board but said the answer would shock. (Incidentally Baseball America has Castellanos ranked #14).

I never think very highly of college reliever picks. It’s setting the ceiling too low.

Castellanos sounds exciting. It would be terrific if he signed soon and played a bit this year. Probably too much to ask.

Hope the plans for today include a high caliber starter who’s dropping like Paxton.

TSE

June 8, 2010 at 4:55 pm

We can’t win the WS anyhow, no point in rushing his development. Heck only 5 teams in the AL have less wins than us right now. We should be patient until our team is ready to move forward. Plus we need Inge to every chance to raise his trade stock since DD is taking FOREVER to make deals.

tc chris

June 9, 2010 at 8:35 am

I meant that I hope Castellanos plays in Oneota or wherever the Tigers have rookie league teams. He’s 3 years away from the bigs, minimum, I’m sure.

TSE

June 9, 2010 at 11:41 am

Somehow I think we’d be better off with him in the lineup than Everett. He should be able to already out play him without any development whatsoever. I’d take that gamble any day. So yeah it’s nice to let guys take their time and develop, but that’s only optional, and as far as a minimum, one does not exist in our case of having such a shortage of professional caliber hitters.

How does an organization with no stellar SS prospects go the 1st 15 rounds without drafting one? I stopped following draft tracker after round 15, but how does DD in good consciense ignore a position that has been a weakness ever since Guillen’s body couldn’t take the demands of the position (in other words for three years). We can’t continue to run shortstops out there who have no power and struggle to hit .260. C’mon Dombrowski, you can only have so many arms in one organization.

Mark in Chicago

June 9, 2010 at 1:23 pm

Because their philosophy is to take the best player available with a bias towards pitching (particularly power pitching), which is generally a sound strategy. You can always trade pitching to fill other holes.

It also might have been a function of the draft pool, where some positions are thinner than others. It doesn’t make sense to take a SS that you rated 150th on your board over an outfielder that you have rated 75th, even to fill a need.

I would also point out that C is another area that’s thin and they took a bunch of catchers, so I guess you can only fill one hole at time.

billfer

June 9, 2010 at 9:35 pm

You don’t draft for need in baseball. You take the best player on your board that you can sign. The development arc is too long to draft for need.

Jerry The Tiger Fan

June 10, 2010 at 1:21 am

Uhhh……not one SS in the first 15 rounds? I’m not saying take a SS in the first round come hell or high water, but to ignore that position (generally considered the most important after pitching) entirely is just weird. You’re telling me that no shortstops in the first 15 rounds enticed the Tigers enough to take a flier? As far as the other poster goes (you can only fill one hole at a time in regards to catcher)…………..there are 50 freakin’ rounds. You can draft four position players at each of the eight diamond positions and still take 18 pitchers. In other words, grab 4 or 5 shortstops and let them develop over the next several years. How does not drafting any shortstops help alleviate the problem? Also, the development arc is longer for a SS than a pitcher or a catcher? Sorry, I’m not buying that malarkey.

billfer

June 10, 2010 at 7:10 am

I haven’t seen the Tigers draft board, but I’d venture a guess and say that when the Tigers made their selections, the available shortstops weren’t at the top of their board.

Why grab 4 or 5 shortstops if you’re not high on any of them? And just because they may draft 50, only half that many will actually sign.

Nobody said that the development arc was longer for shortstops than for other positions. The development arc for baseball players is too long to draft for need.

In 2008 they didn’t set out to draft a bunch of college relievers, but when their picks came up college relievers happened to be at the top of their board. It’s not that difficult of a concept.

jud

June 10, 2010 at 12:10 am

when you are drafting high school players just as many as college players there is just no way of knowing. .Plus.like Billfer said the development arc is too long…we are talking 17-18 year old kids….funny even watching the draft because the announcers know nothing about 80 %-90% of the players drafted….or never even, ever, heard of them…it is a crap shoot at best….no way of telling if that player fills your needs unless its a Strausburg or a Porcello

Latest Comments

jud I know it was only an exhibition game ...but...I don't know if I can take that much hysterical laughter from

Coleman http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12413132&categoryid=2521705
On the other hand, Verlander is "confident" and "ready to go," so there's that.

Smoking Loon Good article, Kevin.
Did anyone else have the thought last year that perhaps the biggest problem with Verlander was... predictability? He

Kevin in Dallas Neither does this story.
http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2015/02/detroit_tigers_bring_back_righ_1.html

Kevin in Dallas This picture does not instill a whole bunch of confidence.
http://www.mlive.com/tigers/#/0

Coleman Check out this one: http://www.mlive.com/tigers/index.ssf/2015/02/report_relief_pitcher_joba_cha.html#incart_more_sports
He shaved the beard! And looks like he dropped a few pounds too.

StorminNorman$ http://m.tigers.mlb.com/news/article/110232762/joba-chamberlain-signs-with-detroit-tigers
low price, potential high yield... or maybe not. Whatever the case, Joba certainly said all the right things.

Jim EggersUSMC I concur K in D, am hoping for a good but not great season from JV. Seemed to me he

StorminNorman$ Great info/research Kevin! One point to clarify and factor into the analysis: JV did make $20M last year, but

Coleman Verlander had core muscle surgery last January. Could it be, at his age, and with the type of pitcher he