The Peel Web

I am happy that you are using
this web site and hope that you found it useful. Unfortunately, the cost of
making this material freely available is increasing, so if you have
found the site useful and would like to contribute towards its continuation,
I would greatly appreciate it. Click the button to go to Paypal and make a
donation.

Between 1841 and 1845 the ACLL grew into a very powerful political force. It

used every opportunity to attack the government

was winning support for the anti-government and anti-Corn Law groups by
registering voters and having candidates in by-elections

tried to create discontent among the working classes by encouraging factory-owning
ACLL members to cut wages and put their workers on short time.

As an opposition group, the ACLL threatened Peel's political future.

Peel was in an invidious position. His wealth came from the family's textile
mills and was favourable to freer trade but had come to power at the head of
a Conservative/Tory
government in 1841 on a platform of maintaining the Corn Laws. He believed that
many of Britain's ills were the result of a stagnant economy but needed an excuse
to move for a repeal of the Corn Laws. As Peel argued;

Something effectual must be done to revive the languishing
commerce and manufacturing industry of this country ... We must make
this country a cheap country for living.

In the 1842 Budget he tackled the problem of the Corn Laws by implementing
a reduced sliding scale. When domestic wheat cost 73/- per
quarter, the duty would only be 1/-.
Other measures in the budget were

the introduction of Income Tax at 7d in the £ on incomes over £150 p.a.
for a three year period. Peel had wanted to introduce income tax in 1828-30,
therefore he picked up the old threads in 1842.

he reduced tariffs

raw materials to 5%

semi-manufactured goods to 12%

foreign manufactures to 20%

This sort of legislation won approval
in parliament and continued over the next two Budgets.

By 1844 Peel was becoming increasingly
unpopular among his own back-bench MPs to whom he openly referred as "blockheads".
He never consulted them about policy nor told them what he was proposing to
do. It was becoming clear that the Tory wing
of his party was reluctant to give him the support he demanded. His government
survived a vote on factory reform only because he made it a Vote of Confidence
and Peel realised that his ministry would not be able to carry on much longer.

The protectionists - men who wanted to retain the Corn Laws - were galled by
Peel's change of mind and his "treason" to the party. They felt that he had
abandoned the Conservatives and should therefore resign his leadership - or
at least call an election. Farmers,
especially tenants, were determined to use the franchise to defend protectionism.
They formed the Anti-League in 1844, led by the Dukes
of Buckingham and Richmond. . These men had left the Whigs and joined the Conservatives
because they suspected Whig policy on the Corn Laws: this was partly responsible
for the 1841 Conservative victory. Agricultural MPs were afraid of upsetting
their constituents. The organisation was supported by Benjamin
Disraeli.

In 1845 the beginning of the Irish Potato Famine
gave Peel the excuse for which he had been looking. He felt unable to repeal
the Corn Laws on purely economic grounds but the crisis in Ireland together
with the poor harvests in Britain was an opportunity too good to let pass. Lord
John Russell, the leader of the Whigs,
already had issued the Edinburgh Letter which
encouraged Peel to propose the legislation because he would have the support
of the Whigs. The content of the Bill was his decision alone, providing for
a gradual reduction over three years. He did this because gradual reduction
would create less risk of the failure of the Bill: the Anti-Corn-Law League
demanded total and immediate repeal and Peel could not be seen to be giving
in to extra-parliamentary pressure.

Early in 1846, Peel introduced his proposal to modify the existing Corn Laws.
Following two speeches in parliament on 22
and 27 January he was faced with the defection of two-thirds of his party
and a bitter argument about his personal political consistence and party leadership.
A further speech followed on 4 May
1846. On 15 May he made a speech in
which he set out his attitude on the need for and justification of repeal.

On 15 May 1846 the repeal of the Corn Laws was passed by a combination of Conservatives,
Whigs and free traders. Only 112 Conservatives voted for it; 241 voted against
it. The Bill's passage through the House of Lords probably demonstrates the
military discipline which the Duke of Wellington
enforced on that House for its own good. Repeal was perhaps a concession by
the aristocracy; a timely retreat. Common sense saved the upper classes, because
other reforms such as the 1867 Reform Act, the 1872 secret ballot and so on,
were delayed.

On 26 June 1846 Peel was defeated on an Irish Coercion Bill by a combination
of Whigs, Radicals, Irish and protectionists. He
resigned immediately after that, rather than ask for a dissolution, to prevent
an election becoming a vote of confidence.

These materials may be freely used for
non-commercial purposes in accordance with applicable statutory allowances
and distribution to students. Re-publication in any
form is subject to written permission.