Composers, writers, dreamers, lovers!

January 23, 2009

Vincent Warren, Exec. Director, Center for Constitutional Rights wrote an amazing comment on what Justice should be in the US.

------------------

For those of us who were there at the beginning, when we filed the first habeas corpus cases almost seven years ago to the day that President Obama ordered Guantanamo closed, today's executive orders are far from radical, although greatly appreciated and much overdue. A long-awaited sigh of relief was heard all around. At last, we have a president in Barack Obama who has committed the nation to uphold the rule of law, restore the constitution and comply with international law.

A radical concept? Not at all. Yet, after the last eight years of rampant and defiant government lawlessness, Barack Obama's executive orders to close Guantanamo and the secret CIA black sites and comply with the Geneva Conventions appear to many as a radical shift.

Still, we are concerned by the lack of specificity in the President's order and its vague timeline. Sadly, the very two issues that prompted the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) to intervene in 2002 remain of concern even in the wake of these remarkable orders. The first issue is what to do about detention, and the second is what we mean by dangerous and who we trust to define it.

If the men at Guantanamo cannot be immediately charged, they must be released or (for those who would face torture or persecution) found safe havens - our Constitution demands it. Those were among the very first words that lawyers uttered on this issue seven years ago. Two presidents, three attorneys general and two secretaries of defense later, we are still saying the same thing. It is clear that President Obama will comply with the rule of law. The men in Guantanamo who have been sitting in jail for years, however, have heard this before. We continue to remind the decision-makers that each additional day being held illegally deepens the injustice for these men. And, for our nation, each additional day these men are held illegally under the Obama administration means the weakening of his promise to uphold our values and the mandates of our law.

CCR issued a report just last week outlining three simple steps to close Guantanamo and put an end to the dark legacy of torture that exists there. We continue to emphasize that there are at least 60 men who are detained at Guantanamo Bay who are at risk of torture or persecution were they to be returned to their countries of origin, and no plan has been detailed for finding them safe haven.

It took George Bush days to send the men into a black hole. Justice demands that this new government work to get them out with in the first 100 days.

On the second issue, who is dangerous and who do we trust to tell us so? Seven years ago, George Bush declared that the first 20 men sent to Guantánamo were the "worst of the worst." The country was scared. CCR and others challenged the government to give us more than just the simple assurance: "trust us." We went to the courts to get the government to put up or shut up by means of the age-old writ of habeas corpus -- the right to go before an impartial court and know the charges against one. First, the government delayed, and when it lost in the courts, it delayed some more, all the time releasing 500 men out of the back door of Guantanamo. Why? Because when we pressed the government through the courts, they could no longer deny the truth - that the vast majority of the men in Guantanamo shouldn't have been there in the first place.

Seven years later, the Bush administration has passed the mantle. Yet all around us, the echoes of the outgoing administration tell us, trust us, these last 245 guys are really the worst of the worst. There are 50, no 80, no 100 who we somehow know are guilty but we don't have the evidence to prosecute or we somehow know may be dangerous in the future so we have to find a way to keep them detained.

What we expect Barack Obama to understand is that our values and the rule of law compel us to challenge him to tell us more than "trust us." In addition, he has the added burden of taking office after some of these men have been in illegal detention for close to a decade. To delay justice is to deny it. We said it then, and we say it now. This time, we are asking the Obama administration to make quick determinations - within 100 days - as to who they intend to try in federal courts and who they intend to release. Then to get to the business of doing both with the speed and efficiency that, up until this moment, defined only illegal government activities. A radical concept? Not at all.

January 22, 2009

The lobbying rules announced yesterday aim to end what has become a way of life in Washington, where those serving in an administration collect chits that are quickly cashed in once they depart government. Under the new rules, presidential appointees who leave office will not be allowed to lobby any federal agency as long as Obama remains in office.

"It's not about advantaging yourself. It's not about advancing your friends or your corporate clients. It's not about advancing an ideological agenda or the special interests of any organization," Obama told Cabinet members and senior staff at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. "Public service is, simply and absolutely, about advancing the interests of Americans."

The disclosure rules turn existing law on its head, requiring the government to err on the side of releasing information, not on the side of keeping documents and records secret.

"The old rules said that if there was a defensible argument for not disclosing something to the American people, then it should not be disclosed. That era is over now," Obama declared.

Yes.. the old rules don't apply. The Republicans were outraged that Clinton "lied" to the American people and yet Bush setup entire departments to lie to world. The Republicans are concerned about Clinton's using influence for gain and yet, Bushes friends and business associates frequently won contracts and staff earned lucrative jobs. The BUSH era is over... Whew!

January 20, 2009

I find it fascinating that so many Right Wing supports of Prop 8 are also supports of Democracy and Capitalism. Well, according to Jesse McKinley of the New York Times, the supporters of Prop 8 (the change to the California Constitution banning same sex marriages) have been identified on a map with arrows pointing to businesses and donors. Gay rights groups are then using their clout to boycott these businesses.

Many of the businesses are being severely hurt and probably wishing they hadn't supported the proposition. So, is this democracy, capitalism, or terrorism??? The vote by the people passed, but if this tactic works, it will very likely be overturned in another election.

Whatever you want to call it, I say, if you're not willing to stand behind the issues you support and suffer the fallout for that support, then you have no business supporting it in the first place.

January 14, 2009

According to a Fox News Report (so there is serious question as to it's accuracy - still), a senior Bush official admitted the person who would have been part of the 9/11 attack was tortured while at Guantanamo.

Fortunately, Obama is planning on shutting the facility down as soon as he steps into office. Bush should have done this years ago, but no, these people are too dangerous.

Yes, the official thinks the prisoner would have participated in the 9/11 attacks if he would have made it into the US by August of 2001. But, no matter how evil these people may be, torturing them is NOT excusable. To do so only puts us at the same level as those we are trying to defend against, at the same level as those we call evil... and so we become evil as well.

December 25, 2008

It may seem a bit sad to post a Christmas message on our blog, but Christmas Cards didn't get out this year (yet again)... But we did want to send our love to our friends and family that read this blog.

This may well be our last Christmas in Edinburgh and so feelings are a bit melancholic this year. Rather than firsts it seems to be a season of "lasts". We really wanted to attend the Christmas Eve service at St Giles this year, but cinnamon rolls weren't quite done, so, we didn't make it. We did get out to the Christmas Market several times through the season.

As we packed up the wrapping post Christmas gift giving, rather than fold up the reasonable good paper and re-usable ribbons we just pitched it all. The boxes were saved more for their use in packing things up later... So, yes, I guess the process of leaving has officially begun. We don't have a due date to depart and still don't know where we'll end up. Much of life is still very much in the air, but somehow, the eventual departure from here seems real.

So, as we prepare ourselves for yet another year of change, we hope life for you feels safe and secure. May your new year be one of prosperity...

December 16, 2008

1. Put Your iTunes on Shuffle.
2. For each question, press the next button to get your answer.
3. You must write down the name of the song no matter how silly it sounds!
4. Put any comments in brackets after the song name.

If someone says, “Is this okay,” you say?

Fugue for Tinhorns (Guys and Dolls) Lerner and Lowe (I got the
horse right here!)