FANTASY FOOTBALL ARTICLES

One of the most polarizing things in all of sports over the past couple of years has been the use of the word “elite” as it pertains to NFL quarterbacks, namely Eli Manning and Joe Flacco.

It was August 2011 and Manning was being interviewed on ESPN New York 1050 by Michael Kay, “Is Eli Manning an elite quarterback? Are you a top-five, top-ten quarterback?” is what Kay asked Manning.

Manning answered, “Yeah, I think I am.”, and it created quite the furor among both fans and the media. Eli’s eliteness was debated ad-nauseum for much of the 2011 season — a season that ended with Peyton’s little brother hoisting not only the Lombardi Trophy but also the Pete Rozelle Trophy as Super Bowl XLVI MVP.

Then approximately nine months after Manning was asked if he was elite, Flacco was posed pretty much the same question when Drew Forrester of WSNT.NET said, “Here’s the $100 million dollar question. So your agent Joe Linta says, “if winning matters Joe Flacco is one of the top-five quarterbacks in the NFL.”, Forrester then asked, ” So I say to you Joe Flacco, Is Joe Flacco one of the top-five quarterbacks in the NFL? (Skip to 15:17)” Unlike Kay, Forrester didn’t exactly use the word elite, but when Flacco responded by saying, “Without a doubt. What do you expect me to say?”, you just knew that a fan and media frenzy about the topic would ensue.Flacco then clarified what he meant by saying, “I would assume everybody thinks they’re a top-five quarterback. I mean I think I’m the best. I don’t think I’m top-five, I mean I think I’m the best. I mean I don’t think I’d be very successful at my job if I didn’t feel that way.” It didn’t take long for fans and the media to once again end up consumed in a debate about a quarterback’s eliteness. A debate that still rages on, fueled by the fire of Flacco’s terrific postseason run — a run that ended with Flacco hoisting both the Lombardi and Pete Rozelle Trophies, just like Manning did one year prior.

With the debate about Flacco being elite or not still raging on it seemed that finding a barometer to see if Flacco measures up on the elite scale would be the wise thing to do. It probably seems crazy to use Tom Brady — a surefire first-ballot Hall of Famer — as that barometer, but comparing what Brady accomplished in his first five seasons as a starter (his entire body of work wouldn’t be a fair comparison) should prove to be a very good way to gauge if Flacco is indeed elite. That means for the sake of comparison Brady’s seasons from 2001-2005 (14 games started in 2001) will be utilized, and for Flacco it will be 2008-2012.

At this point you are probably retracing Brady’s career to try to figure out if he was considered elite after just five years as a starter. He was. Look no further than the July 2006 USA TODAY article, “Among NFL QBs, Brady at head of the class“, where Tom Weir wrote, “It also finally proved Brady can be mortal on a huge stage but did absolutely nothing to diminish his status as the NFL’s most esteemed quarterback. Our panel of experts made Brady a unanimous selection as the game’s best at directing an offense.”

After just five years as a starter, Brady was the golden boy of the NFL. Was that only because of his three Super Bowl wins and two Super Bowl MVP awards? Or was it that plus his overall production as a quarterback? Again, looking at what Tom Weir wrote, “Our panel of experts made Brady a unanimous selection as the game’s best at directing an offense.” it is safe to say that there was more to Brady than his Super Bowl wins and those two MVP awards.

If you are in the camp that overly values Super Bowl wins and Super Bowl MVP awards then you will have an easy time dismissing the argument that Joe Flacco is elite. However, if you realize that there is more to it than just postseason success you should find the following interesting, to say the least.

Since we aren’t far removed from Super Bowl XLVII we might as well take a look at how Flacco and Brady compare postseason wise. Brady boasts a 10-1 record with three of those wins coming in the Super Bowl. While Flacco’s record may not be as gaudy, 9-4 with a win in each of his first five seasons and a Super Bowl win to boot isn’t anything to sneeze at.

Another thing worth noting is that during the postseason Brady has played five of his eight games or 62.5%, in the friendly confines of Gillette Stadium, while Flacco has played just two of his 12 games, or 16.7%, at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore. In addition to that, the Patriots held opponents to 17 or fewer points in seven of Brady’s 11 postseason games. The Ravens on the other hand allowed more than 17 points in six of Flacco’s 13 postseason games. The old adage of “defense wins championships”, may or may not hold water in today’s NFL, but you can bet your bottom dollar it sure can make things easier.

One thing that Flacco does have over Brady in the playoffs is that he not only made the playoffs in each of his first five seasons, but that he also has a win in each of those five seasons — an NFL record to start a career. Brady and the Patriots missed the playoffs in 2002. With that said, it is easy to see it was during his third thru fifth years as a starter that Brady elevated himself to one of, if not the best, quarterback in the NFL.
Therefore, if it was 2003-2005 that really cemented Brady as the best quarterback in the NFL we should take a look at how he and Flacco compare in years three through five during the playoffs. Wins and losses Brady still comes out on top with a 7-1 record — including two more Super Bowls — but Flacco’s 6-2 record — with a Super Bowl win — isn’t exactly chopped liver. Does that one additional Super Bowl win in that three-year period really set Brady all that far apart from Flacco? Maybe it does, then again, maybe it doesn’t.

Maybe the answer lies in the statistics that we have all come to love as a way of defining just how good or bad a quarterback is. Passer rating is a good starting point and Brady’s comes in at 89.4 — Flacco’s, a few points less at 86.2. Safe to say that those passer ratings are in the same ballpark, but wait, we didn’t look at their passer rating in years three through five. With that as the criteria Flacco comes in with a passer rating of 105 to Brady’s 93.8. Bet you didn’t see that coming. Remember, it was years three through five that really cemented Brady as the best the NFL had to offer at quarterback.

Of course there are other statistics worth looking at. Completion percentage is one you must be thinking Brady will own Flacco in, and depending on how you look at it you would be correct. Brady’s overall completion percentage is 61.42, and Flacco’s is a bit lower at 55.50 percent. However, if you look at years three through five, Brady’s completion percentage is 61.11, and Flacco’s is 59.29 percent – making Flacco just five drops from being dead even – looks like Flacco is back in the same ballpark. Take a look at touchdowns and interceptions and you find that both players are again close. Over each players first five years Brady has 16 touchdowns and 6 interceptions, and Flacco has 19 touchdowns and 8 interceptions. If you look at years three through five, Flacco’s touchdowns (18) to interceptions (2) are both better than Brady’s total of 14 and 4. Feel free to look at the rest of their playoff stats in the following tables.

QB

Year

Cmp

Att

Cmp%

Yds

TD

Int

Passer Rating

Brady

2001

32

52

61.50%

312

0

1

70.4

Brady

2001

12

18

66.70%

115

0

0

84.3

Brady

2001

16

27

59.30%

145

1

0

86.2

TOTAL 2001

60

97

61.86%

572

1

1

77.34

Brady

2003

21

41

51.20%

201

1

0

73.3

Brady

2003

22

37

59.50%

237

1

1

76.1

Brady

2003

32

48

66.70%

354

3

1

100.5

Brady

2004

18

27

66.70%

144

1

0

92.2

Brady

2004

14

21

66.70%

207

2

0

130.5

Brady

2004

23

33

69.70%

236

2

0

110.2

Brady

2005

15

27

55.60%

201

3

0

116.4

Brady

2005

20

36

55.60%

341

1

2

74

Total 03-05

165

270

61.11%

1921

14

4

93.76

Total 01-05

285

464

61.42%

3065

16

6

89.42

QB

Year

Cmp

Att

Cmp%

Yds

TD

Int

Passer Rating

Flacco

2008

9

23

39.10%

135

0

0

59.1

Flacco

2008

11

22

50.00%

161

1

0

89.4

Flacco

2008

13

30

43.30%

141

0

3

18.2

Flacco

2009

4

10

40.00%

34

0

1

10

Flacco

2009

20

35

57.10%

189

0

2

48.4

TOTAL 08-09

57

120

47.50%

660

1

6

46.52

Flacco

2010

25

34

73.50%

265

2

0

115.4

Flacco

2010

16

30

53.30%

125

1

1

61.1

Flacco

2011

14

27

51.90%

176

2

0

97.1

Flacco

2011

22

36

61.10%

306

2

1

95.4

Flacco

2012

12

23

52.20%

282

2

0

125.6

Flacco

2012

18

34

52.90%

331

3

0

116.2

Flacco

2012

21

36

58.30%

240

3

0

106.2

Flacco

2012

22

33

66.70%

287

3

0

124.2

Total 10-12

150

253

59.29%

2012

18

2

105.00

Total 08-12

207

373

55.50%

2672

19

8

86.20

At this point it is safe to say that Flacco’s postseason numbers — Super Bowl wins notwithstanding — are very comparable to Brady’s. However, there is more to a career than just the postseason.

Surely, Brady’s regular season statistics will clearly separate him from Flacco, or will they?

If you want to hang your hat on wins then Brady’s 58 wins tops Flacco’s 54. Game over? Of course not. Touchdowns is another statistic where Brady’s 121 outpaces Flacco’s 102. A 19 touchdown difference in Brady’s favor might seem like a big number but when you break it down to a per game average you get a slight .276 difference. We like to look at touchdowns because touchdowns lead to scoring and scoring leads to wins — team wins that are usually attributed to the quarterback – which is a discussion for another time. While we are talking about scoring, it should be pointed out that Brady’s Patriots averaged 24.31 points/game, a mere 1.7 points/game more than the 22.61 averaged by Flacco’s Ravens. Ballpark? Sure looks that way.

If wins and touchdowns did not create separation then surely passing yards will. No not really, while Brady does have more passing yards the total is just 396 yards or a difference of 10.73 yards/game. Is the equivalent of three Michael Turner rushing attempts difference enough to separate Brady and Flacco?

What about red zone efficiency? Surely, this is where Brady drives the stake in that creates the divide, and keeps Flacco from matching his eliteness. Or like everything else up to this point, will it? With Brady at the helm the Patriots had a red zone efficiency of 54.31 percent, and the Ravens with Flacco under center come in at 51.36 percent — another advantage (2.95 percent) for Brady.

If it weren’t for kickers both teams would have been better in the red zone. If Brady’s kicker — Super Bowl savior — Adam Vinatieri had not missed four regular season red zone field goals, Brady’s red zone efficiency would have been 55.80 percent. Four missed field goals for Vinatieri might seem like a lot, but compared to how many field goals Ravens kickers missed it isn’t nearly as bad. The kicking trio of Matt Stover, Steven Haushka and Billy Cundiff combined to miss nine regular season red zone field goals. Had those nine field goal attempts been successful, Flacco’s red zone efficiency would sit at 54.9 percent. If not for kickers, Flacco and the Ravens would have been right in the old ballpark with Brady and the Patriots regarding red-zone efficiency. The following table shows the above mentioned regular season statistics as well as some others that show both Brady and Flacco are very comparable.

QB

Year

Wins

Losses

Pass Yds

Comp%

Pass TDs

INTS

Passer Rating

Flacco

2008

11

5

2971

60.0

14

12

80.2

Flacco

2009

9

7

3613

63.1

21

12

88.9

Flacco

2010

12

4

3622

62.6

25

10

93.6

Flacco

2011

12

4

3610

57.6

20

12

80.9

Flacco

2012

10

6

3817

59.7

22

10

87.8

TOTAL

54

26

17633

60.5

102

56

86.3

Brady

2001

11

3

2843

63.9

18

12

86.5

Brady

2002

9

7

3764

62.1

28

14

85.7

Brady

2003

14

2

3620

60.2

23

12

85.9

Brady

2004

14

2

3692

60.8

28

14

92.6

Brady

2005

10

6

4110

63.0

24

12

92.3

TOTAL

58

20

18029

61.9

121

64

88.6

QB

Year

Points

Pts/Game

1st Downs Passing

1st Downs Passing/Game

RZ%

3rd Down %

Flacco

2008

385

24.06

147

9.19

47.06

40.95

Flacco

2009

391

24.44

187

11.69

52.63

41.59

Flacco

2010

257

16.06

175

10.94

49.02

39.05

Flacco

2011

378

23.63

181

11.31

51.02

42.36

Flacco

2012

398

24.88

182

11.38

57.14

36.87

TOTAL

1809

22.61

872

10.90

51.36

40.20

Brady

2001

351

25.07

145

10.36

48.94

43.01

Brady

2002

381

23.81

184

11.50

53.06

42.73

Brady

2003

348

21.75

177

11.06

44.00

37.00

Brady

2004

437

27.31

193

12.06

58.73

45.15

Brady

2005

379

23.69

204

12.75

63.79

42.08

TOTAL

1896

24.31

903

11.58

54.31

41.89

By analyzing all the presented numbers it should be very apparent that Flacco, at least number wise, is right there with Brady.

Over the past seven seasons, Brady’s production has really soared. Helping to solidify him as one of the greatest quarterbacks of all-time — even with a postseason record of 7-6 with no Super Bowl wins. It remains to be seen if Flacco’s production follows the same path, and quite honestly, for this exercise it doesn’t matter. All that matters is that Flacco’s statistics in his first five seasons do hold up against Brady’s statistics from his first five seasons as a starter, and he is indeed worthy of being looked at as an elite quarterback.

Which by the way, my money is on him getting paid like one too.

That leaves me wondering one last thing. Are Falcons’ fans hoping that this offseason someone asks Matt Ryan if he thinks he is elite?