11/29/2016

The mystery in Donald Trump’s vetting of Mitt Romney for the position of Secretary of State has seemed to come down to one question: Is Trump trying to humiliate Romney, or does he actually want him as Secretary of State?

Maybe the answer is: both.

Does Trump actually want Romney? Maybe! He “looks the part” — plus, what better way is there for Trump to show Romney who is the alpha male? As for the “apology” Trump is supposedly demanding, Trump may be savvy enough to know that he doesn’t need to demand it. The first time Secretary of State Romney faces questioners from Big Media, they’ll ask him: Hey, didn’t you say “Dishonesty is Donald Trump’s hallmark”? Didn’t you call him an unstable bully? And Romney will have to smile and squirm and kind of walk it back, a little.

So yeah, maybe Trump does want Romney after all.

But that doesn’t mean he’s not trying to humiliate him.

Part of my evidence for the theory that Trump was trying to embarrass Romney was my belief that Conway had permission to “go rogue.” As I said yesterday: “I don’t think Kellyanne Conway breathes without instructions.” As noted earlier this morning by Dan Spencer, the Trump campaign has confirmed that Conway asked permission before laying into Romney publicly. The New York Timeshas further details:

Mr. Trump, in a statement emailed Monday evening by his spokeswoman, Hope Hicks, said: “Kellyanne came to me and asked whether or not she could go public with her thoughts on the matter. I encouraged her to do so. Most importantly she fully acknowledged there is only one person that makes the decision. She has always been a tremendous asset and that will continue.”

But wait! Who really wrote that statement?

@Patterico@benshapiro This does not sound like Trump. There are complete sentences in this statement. Who really wrote it?

The NYT claims that Conway took the initiative and did not act on specific instructions from Trump to criticize Romney. She asked permission to express her concerns and he granted it . . . or so the Trump folks say. And that may be — but just because they make the claim, doesn’t mean it’s true. These people lie as easily as they breathe.

At a minimum, let’s just say that Trump . . . was not displeased to see one of his main critics trashed on “the shows.”

The Times claims that “little in Mr. Trump’s universe is simple.” Perhaps there is a more complex answer to the question: Does Trump really want Romney, or does he just want Romney to be humiliated? Maybe the answer is a little of both.

But maybe the answer is simple after all. Maybe, as with so many areas of public policy, the answer is that Trump has no idea what he wants.

Conway did have permission, but that could be only because Trump wants her to feel free to voice criticism, because I think he thinks, normally, you get the truth from women, and he doesn’t want do anything to stop her.

The overall way Trump s running his nascent administration has been compared to….

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie called a press conference, but it wasn’t to say he was leaving the tranistion, or that he was being appointed Secretary of Transportation, but that he was going to commence a renovation of the New Jersey state house.

2. It trolls the establishment. They go absolutely head-explody every time, fact-checking and refuting and all the things people do when trolled. Sometimes they even realize it, but can’t help themselves.

I like the appointment of Mrs. McConnell too, cynical though it may be.

Good on ideology (Price); good on strategy (Elaine Chao).

Most pols are short-sighted incompetents who choose to surround themselves with familiar yes-men. The last three presidents all did this. What a refreshing change.

I’m now beginning to think that Trump may become a Reagan-like president who delegates authority to smart, competent managers and doesn’t try to micro-manage. His choices so far give me reason for hope.

As to the topic of this thread, perhaps Trump can’t find any truly outstanding candidate for what is a very important job and is having trouble deciding which JV player best fits the bill? Trump has been doing such a good job with appointees, in general, I’m inclined to cut him some slack on this one.

“We are going to have to rebuild within this wild-wild-west-of-information flow some sort of curating function that people agree to.

There has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through information that passes some basic truthiness tests and those that we have to discard, because they just don’t have any basis in anything that’s actually happening in the world.”

We’ll know soon enough what Trump really wants to do with Romney. The drama he’s created gives him lots of maneuvering room to do whatever he wants. When all is said and done it wouldn’t surprise me to see someone else at the State Department while Romney is offered a job as ambassador to someplace like China or Russia.

The Chairman of the Board is filling seats at the conference table. Who does he want in his boardroom: loyalists who will carry out his directives. That’s Petraeus and Giuliani, especially if he plans to run foreign policy from within the WH a la Nixon/Kissinger. If he wants mere window dressing at State to ‘look the part,’ a la William Rogers, he’ll go with Romney and Corker.

But in this millionaire pissing contest, the winning move for Romney would be to get asked by Trump, then leak he turned him down, flat. Unless, of course, Romney has plans t run again in the future.

Can’t help but notice in that staged Twitter pix -(blocking the reflection of the photographer and wondering who puts hats down neatly w/t peaks pointing away from you on a cluttered desk)- that there’s nothing in the President-elect’s in-box. Or his out-box.

But it’s a helluva good ad for Apple. The Prsident-elect using one of their laptops– likely assembled in CHI-na.

Most pols are short-sighted incompetents who choose to surround themselves with familiar yes-men. The last three presidents all did this. What a refreshing change.

You want some high-competent people, confident of their place, who are not afraid to tell the President he’s full of sh1t. That can be take to a my-way-or-the-highway extreme, as Al Haig did, but you need people who know what they are doing and are not beholden to the President for their future.

Thor — that’s exactly how he runs his businesses. He is “hands off” almost to a fault — he holds final decision authority on all the major stuff, but his decisions are made with input from all the top executives who are personally involved in a given project.

“For all the challenges a President Trump may present conservatives during his term, his populism need not be one of them. Far from contradictory, conservatism and populism complement each other in ways that can change history — as did the most successful populist in recent decades, Ronald Reagan.”

How can this do anything but hurt Romney, whether or not he is chosen? Either Romney doesn’t make the final cut and is permanently mocked as a “loser” by Trump and his supporters, or he becomes Trump’s foreign policy fall guy for as long as Trump decides to keep him around. Every mistake will be Romney’s and Trump will take credit for every success.

The last two Secretaries of State have been John Forbes Kerry and Hillary Rotten Clinton.
I’d say that whomever the Mr Donald chooses will be an improvement.
We’re going to make America greater than it would have been had that nasty Hillary woman won the election.

If he does choose Romney, announce it, then go on this ego-recharging, intoxicating ‘victory tour,’ Trump’s likely to get an earful of ‘boos’ from the crowd, swallow hard and finally experience a hangover.

if the food stampers eject their filthy pelosi tomorrow and we’re still stuck with feckless chamberpot homo mcconnell

they kinda win that round don’t they

Your man Trump not only picked someone from Goldman Sachs to be SecTreas, he picked Sen. McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, for Transportation. She was SecLabor for Bush-43 after also serving in the Bush-41 administration.

My guess is that Trump doesn’t give a flying fig about the Department of Transportation, but someone — Pence or Conway — engineered this deal specifically as a rapprochement, a new detente, between Trump and the Senate GOPe folks. So much for draining any swamps — Trump’s just going to recycle the swamp water and put his brand name on it so he can charge us more for it.

…and I always thought vouchers/choice was a backdoor way toward busing with/without/ or in different colors than yellow re the need to accomodate “voucher-holders” in search of excess classroom capacity

SEARCH AMAZON USING THIS SEARCH BOX:
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.