I have had evolutionists actually refer me to animated videos as proof. That's why I post this. Having worked with flash animation I know the person either animates an "observable" process (real reality), or one he can picture in his mind because he cannot observe it (made up reality). The second one applies to evolution 99% of the time. Because if it were as observable as claimed why all the animation?

It is the same thing as illustrations. They take information and fill in the gaps of knowledge to show what the artist wants you to see. They can add hair and a more apelike appearance (skin on top of the bones is uncertain) to "hominids". They can take a few bones and generate a whole skeleton, but ultimately this "filling in the gaps of knowledge" is not necessarily reality. There is a huge room for error and bias to creep in, and it does, they use it to support their bias.