>In doing the tests, we found that some of the namespace references were omitted or incorrect.
Could you please open issue(s) for the problems you found? We need to get the scenarios fixed if they are wrong.
/paulc
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
Sent: April 26, 2007 1:15 PM
To: Doug Davis; public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org
Subject: RE: Round4 external attachment testing
Hi Doug:
Perhaps we shd have used different words.
Essentially, there are 3 inputs: policies, external attachment specifications, WSDL.
There is one output: The input WSLD with policy references added.
In doing the tests, we found that some of the namespace references were omitted or incorrect.
You shd fix these when you write your test.
All the best, Ashok
________________________________
From: public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:52 AM
To: public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org
Subject: Round4 external attachment testing
Couple of questions on the round4 external attachment testing:
- the doc says these are unit testcase and not interop ones, but it also talks about a requestor and service and sending a message around. If they're unit testcases then it would seem we wouldn't need to define these roles. Are they really unit testcases? if so, defining these roles seems unnecessary. Any reason its not a true interop test?
- the doc talks about the format of the message between the requestor and service but I couldn't find it in the doc - where is it?
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com