City Government

Have Laptops Flunked the Test?

Last spring, the city launched a pilot program to provide a free laptop for
every student at seven middle schools on the Upper West Side The “One-to-One in Ten” program
(so named because it takes place in School District 10 and aims to achieve
a one-to-one student to laptop ratio) had a modest beginning. But City Councilmember
Gale
Brewer, the chair of the council’s technology committee who championed the program and represents most of the Upper West Side, hopes that every public middle school student in New York City some day will have access to a laptop at school. Eventually some advocates thought the students might even be able to take their computers home at night.

Brewer’s enthusiasm is based upon research that
shows that using laptops encourage students to engage more deeply with their
coursework. The so-called
one-to-one programs also seek to prepare students for the technologically driven
world in which they live and to close the
digital
divide between students who have computers and those whose families
may not be able to afford them.

But a problem has arisen: There is little evidence that students who use laptops
in class do better on standardized tests than students who do not. Since President
George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act in 2002, a school’s aggregate performance on standardized tests has become of foremost concern for school administrators. Given this reality, a national backlash against laptops in the classroom is brewing just as New York City has begun to embrace the trend.

PUTTING LAPTOPS IN SCHOOLS

New York City is far from alone in using laptops for educational purposes.
Maine has
launched a similar program, and many Maine teachers who worked in one-to-one
laptop initiatives are now advising others about how to begin similar
programs. A study of 2,500 of the country’s largest school districts conducted last year found an increasing number gave all students and teachers computers connected to the Internet, sometimes for use at home as well as at school.

DO COMPUTERS DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD?

In general, though, evidence seems to be emerging that technology is not a cure-all for the nation’s
classroom. A recent Department of Education study, for example, while not considering
the laptop programs, looked at 15 software programs used in schools and found
that they did not lead to higher test scores.

On the other hand, as the Times
recently reported, school district are seeing
a downside to the computers. Many districts find that they spend too much time
and money fixing and maintaining the computers. One letter writer to the Times
pointed out that maintenance is a greater problem with Windows machines than
Apple products. But regardless of the type of computer, students use them to
access educationally trivial (and sometimes pornographic) web sites. Students
at one suburban Syracuse school, the Times found, used the laptops to exchange
test answers and view pornography. When the school tried to stop that, some
students found a way around the increased security â€“ and used the computers to tell their fellow students how to do that.

Faced with all of this, school districts that serve a diversity of student populations — some affluent, some poor, and with various ethnic groups — are abandoning their laptops

BEYOND TEST SCORES

So, have the defenders of laptops in the classroom lost the debate? Is it time to revert to the chalkboard and the fundamentals of reading, writing, and arithmetic? Not so fast, argues Bruce Lai. Lai is Brewer’s
chief of staff and an expert on how to increase broadband Internet access in
underserved areas of New York
City

He points out that many of schools abandoning their laptops programs have students who have ready access to broadband Internet connections at home. He worries, though, that taking a similar step in New York City’s school will “consign working-class students” to
a technological apartheid. According to a recent report by the Pew Internet
and American Life Project, only 21 percent of households with an annual income
of $30,000 or less had a broadband connection at home in 2006.

Lai and educational research consultant Saul
Rockman also question some of
the reasoning that has led schools to abandon laptops. The goal of laptop learning,
they say, is not to improve standardized test scores, but rather to capture
the imagination of students as they work on projects that would either be impossible
or much more difficult without a computer. For example, the students in Maine
reportedly used laptops to create a book in Spanish for children in Guatemala,
an activity whose benefits are difficult to quantify with standardized tests.

THE TEACHER’S ROLE

Another barrier to the success of laptop programs is teacher resistance. Instructors who are used to teaching the traditional way may resent the introduction of laptops into their classrooms. “The box gets in the way,” Liverpool, New York, school board president Mark Lawson told the Times.

Teachers who perceive a potential benefit for laptops in their classrooms and are willing to change their teaching style to allow for increased student control of learning are more likely to take a positive view of one to-one laptop programs.

Laptop programs should take this into account. Lai points out that meaningful plans for integrating technology into the classroom â€“ and addressing resistance to change among teachers — are just as important to the success of the computing plan as the laptops themselves.

Such cultural changes take a long time to occur but some are working on
it. Teaching Matters is a New York based non-profit that seeks to hasten the
process. Believing that technology can improve learning if it is used properly,
they provide assistance in the classroom as well as workshops and on line help
so teachers can make better use of technology

In the meantime, researchers from Fordham University’s Regional
Educational Technology Center have begun to evaluate the efficacy of the “One-to-One in Ten” initiative. Surely there is room for improvement, but one hopes it will find some signs of greater student engagement with their own learning. But that might not be enough. In today’s world, educational assessment is driven by standardized exams, and classroom laptop programs may fail the test.

The comments section is provided as a free service to our readers. Gotham Gazette's editors reserve the right to delete any comments. Some reasons why comments might get deleted: inappropriate or offensive content, off-topic remarks or spam.

The Place for New York Policy and politics

Gotham Gazette is published by Citizens Union Foundation and is made possible by support from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the Altman Foundation,the Fund for the City of New York and donors to Citizens Union Foundation. Please consider supporting Citizens Union Foundation's public education programs. Critical early support to Gotham Gazette was provided by the Charles H. Revson Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.