You may also like...

Um, that’s not how it works, buddy. You don’t get to just follow the rules that you want to follow. If you feel a law is unjust, you work to change the law. You’re creeping into tin foil hat territory again. Perhaps you should take a deep breath, back away from the computer, and just take a break from vlogging for a month or so. Get out of the city and take in some country. Roll up your sleeves. Eat an orange. Read some Vonnegut. Visit a sick friend in the hospital. Volunteer your time at a local soup kitchen. Build a birdhouse. Learn a new instrument. Mend your own clothes. Adopt a pet from your local animal shelter. Take a firearms safety course. Enjoy real maple syrup. Make cream cheese wontons from scratch. Call up an old friend just because. I may be being a bit wry, but in all seriousness, I do worry about you. You seem like a decent chap and I don’t want to see you hurt.

michaelrivero

You are incredibly naive. The ability for the public to change the laws was stolen from us long ago. And I agree with the above author that We The People have a right to defy unjust laws, just as the men and women who created this nation did under King George III.

By virtue of their lies (like Saddam’s nuclear weapons) and rigged elections, the Federal Government has lost all legitimacy.

The good news is that we have to do nothing at all. The system is tearing itself apart just as the former USSR did, and our task is to be ready to set up a new government that serves the nation and its people rather than the private central bankers and Israel, and be ready to tar and feather any and all carpetbaggers who try to restart the same corrupt system again.

oldranger68

Kazoo, are you blowing that kazoo out of your ass? Do you actually believe anything you just wrote? If so, you need more help than anyone here is able to provide. I have a feeling you’re in much greater danger of being hurt. Dipstick!

Joel Kazoo

>Do you actually believe anything you just wrote?

Yes. Maple syrup is delicious and should be enjoyed. I think you misconstrue my concern for Johnny’s well-being as me being worried that the big bad gubmint is coming to take him away. No, I’m seeing signs of a clinically depressed person and I’m worried that he may harm himself.

oldranger68

Oh, shit, Kazoo. I’m sorry. Had I known you really were retarded I wouldn’t have made fun of you. Nah, not really. I’ll make fun of you anyway.

desertspeaks

Dear kazoo, you couldn’t possibly more WRONG! It is blindingly obvious that it is your opinion that their CONstitution and laws automatically apply to everyone..
Everyone has been told that the CONstitution and law automatically apply to everyone. everyone feels it applies, everyone believes it applies, everyone assumes and presumes it applies. HOWEVER;
hearsay, your opinions, feelings, beliefs, assumptions and presumptions aren’t proof of a damn thing.

What factual, first hand, irrefutable evidence can you or anyone else offer that proves that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person simply because they are physically in what we commonly refer to as a state.

Keeping in mind that slavery and involuntary servitude is illegal. Further, no private person is a party to their CONstitution nor is any private person a signatory to their CONstitution, nor has any private person sworn an oath to be bound by or to obey the CONstitution and laws.

Your proof MUST be factual and first hand, your proof/evidence shall not be comprised of hearsay, opinions, beliefs, feelings, assumptions, presumptions, hypotheticals, conjecture, sophistry, fraud, lies, scenarios or what if’s.

Good luck!

Tom

Eliminate the Federal Reserve and Zionism- great start. Congress is Zionist controlled. The POTUS is Zionist controlled. No more dual citizens, no more Ashkenazi Jews holding political office. The Constitution needs a reboot. “The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.”–Henry Kissinger

God created man, man created government, government created a PERSON. A PERSON is considered a corporation. Your name in all CAPS is that person. Next time you go to court ask court to prove Jurisdiction over you the human being, and tell them you are not the PERSON on the summons. The United States is a corporation and you are agents in all CAPS.

“…We are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for examination on the suit of the State. The individual may stand upon his Constitutional Rights as a Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the State since he receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of his life, liberty, and property. His Rights are such as the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are the refusals to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under warrant of law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” “Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state. It is presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public. It receives certain special privileges and franchises, and holds them subject to the laws of the state and the limitations of its charter. Its rights to act as a corporation are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation. There is a reserved right in the legislature to investigate its contracts and find out whether it has exceeded
its powers. It would be a strange anomaly to hold that the State, having chartered a corporation to make use of certain franchises, could not in exercise of its sovereignty inquire how those franchises had been employed, and whether they had been abused, and demand the production of corporate books and papers for that purpose.” [Emphasis added] Hale vs. Hinkel, 201 U.S. 43, 74-75, (1906).

This is why Congress isn’t listening to you, because your PERSON was created by them. YOU ARE A MAN OR WOMAN.