SOFIC 19 – SIG SAUER Exhibits Next Gen Squad Weapons

In a surprising move, SIG exhibited their final prototype candidates for the US Army Next Generation Squad Weapon program which seeks to replace the M4 Carbine and M249 Squad Automatics Weapon with a new family of 6.8mm* Weapons which are lighter, yet feature a longer range and more lethal ammunition capable of defeating sophisticated threat body armor.

There are currently two Army efforts underway simultaneously. Both are leveraging an alternative form of procurement referred to as Other Transactional Authority, where Prototype Opportunity Notices are issued to industry and multiple candidate technologies are quickly developed and assessed. The initial round of the multi-phased, first PON to produce a Next Generation Squad Automatic Rifle to replace the SAW comes to a close soon. It includes a requirement for a 20% reduction in weight over legacy brass cased ammunition, but in 6.8mm.

Senior Army leaders are expected to fire the weapons next month at Fort Benning in addition to a formal evaluation to determine which candidates move to the next phase.

A second, more ambitious PON for Squad Weapons is just beginning with a requirement for both SAW and Carbine replacement as well as ammunition. SIG informed us they plan to submit the same belt-fed Machine Gun along with their new, fully developed Carbine.

It’s important to note that although the program calls for replacement of the current 5.56mm NATO M4 and M249 in the Rifle Squad of Brigade Combat Teams, this is a .30 class weapon. If everything goes as planned, the Soldier will have an improvement over not only their 5.56mm weapons, but the 7.62mm NATO ones as well such as the M240 Machine Gun.

Previously, SIG had shown their 338 Norma Mag SIG Light Machine Gun at both AUSA and SHOT Show as well as a 6.8mm Carbine Concept called MCX Medium Range, during AUSA. Their Next Generation Machine Gun candidate is very much a smaller version of their SL LMG.

These latest revelations show a much more mature design.

The Machine Gun weighs in at 11.97 lbs, while the Carbine is 8.1 lbs with no Optic or Suppressor.

One of the concerns of the more to the 6.8mm cartridge is recoil impulse. Like with their 338 NM-class weapon, SIG has incorporated a recoil mitigation technology into the Next Gen belt-fed. This brings the recoil in at 2.8 lbs while an M240 in 7.62mm has a Recoil impulse of 13.1 lbs. Considering they are seeing a muzzle velocity of over 3000 FPS for a 16″ barrel, this is impressive. The Carbine on the other hand is delivering 2850 FPS with a 13″ barrel.

As you can see, the optic isn’t mounted to the feed tray cover. Additionally, the weapon can be set up for left or right feed and loading is as simple as inserting the belt into the cover.

The Carbine boasts an interesting feature. It incorporates both a side folding non-reciprocating charging handle and an AR-style charging handle above the boat carrier group.

This is so the weapon can be charged or immediate action drills implemented without the shooter moving his head from behind the weapon.

The side charger is also not operational when the collapsible folding stock is in the stowed position. Obviously, the side charging handle is not ambidextrous, but the other controls are.

As part of the program, SIG has also introduced a new three piece construction hybrid ammunition. It features a Brass case, Steel base and an internal clip to connect the two.

So far, they have manufactured 40,000 of their 6.8 x 51 cartridge at their plant in Arkansas and are working on an additional 60,000. Due to its construction, the hybrid ammo offers increased velocities over standard ammunition in the same caliber and can be used in all current weapon systems, unlike some next generation ammunition proposals.

As the final Army requirement begins to coalesce, expect to see a Designated Marksman Rifle variant of the Next Generation Carbine as well. This, combined with the increase of performance of 6.8mm over 7.62mm signals the eventual end of 7.62mm weapons in the close combat formations of the BCT along with 5.56mm.

*Editor’s note: This new cartridge is not the 6.8 SPC looked at by USSOCOM a decade ago, but rather something completely new, with performance close to .270 win short mag.

This entry was posted
on Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 at 13:00 and is filed under Advertiser, Ammo, SOFIC, weapons.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

An interesting design but NATO would hate us for this. I have a hard time seeing this happening outside of dismounted combat arms when many non-shooters struggle to qualify with the 5.56 as is. One common round for all dismounted small arms would be great though, but I somehow see this as less likely considering the USMC has already switched away from the SAW and seen success.

The marines fielded an improved Pistol, the M9A1, and that had no impact at all on the Army’s decision to pursue the MHS program and field the M17 and M18. The Army’s pacing threat as they see it is achieving overmatch against plate wearing near peer Infantry, and they want an intermediate caliber cartridge in 6.8mm leveraging the improvements that you see in ammunition such as M855A1 and M80A1. Plus the current fiscal environment is ideal for the program. Army doctrine still employs a belt fed SAW in a 9 man squad and shows no sign of changing that…the weight savings with these prototypes will be much appreciated.

True, but I somehow doubt the DoD will be ok with one branch fielding a different caliber small arm than the other three. The SAW in the 9 man squad concepts has worked so far because of weight savings with the 5.56 and we will see if it continues with a heavier round.

I don’t think the intent is for NATO to adopt this rifle or round. The US and NATO are falling out of love with each other ever since the EU decided to build their own Army and Navy that is designed to fight the US as well as Russia.

The EU has tried and failed to adopt a common military on a couple of occasions. That is a step towards federalization and a loss of sovereignty that the member states are unwilling to cede. If the EU is closer to what the US was under the articles of confederation than it is under the constitution.

Awesome. I think SIG will have a lot of interest in that LMG then beyond the 6.8 contract; to my knowledge thats the lightest 7.62 lmg in the world. Factor in the recoil mitigation and modern optics mounting/ergonomics, and its really a great package.

Any indication of what they’re using for the barrel? I imagine something like the flow formed cobalt / inconel might be required to keep up with the new 6.8.

Yes, there are two documents that cover it. I’m not linking them, because I think links sends the reply to auto-moderator.

You want to google ‘Flow Formed MK48 Barrel,’ it should be the top result, a PDF on ndiastorage by Armstrong. Then the more technical paper is ‘Flow formed M240 Barrel’ which is a DTIC PDF. Both are fascinating documents with lots of interesting stuff.

From the MK48 PDF:

“ARDEC and ONR have been developing High Performance Alloy Barrels
for M240 Series machine guns to avoid the need for spare barrels.
• ATI Flow Formed Cobalt Alloy Lined Nickel Alloy Barrel exceeded 60K
rounds of life under standard firing schedule in the M240 series.”

Does anyone know what recoil mitigation techniques they’re using for the LMG?

And is the 6.8×51 just a necked down 7.62 NATO case or is it fatter? The pic comparison makes it look fatter. Is that how they got the extra velocity, besides loading it hot, with hybrid maybe alleviating primer pressure issues?

I do not think it is fatter, it just looks as if, beause the shoulder angle is different from the .308 and the 6.5 Creedmoor next to it. Sooooo… they reinvented the 7mm-08 wildcat? Those .2 millimetres really do not make much of a difference. I hope you cannot chamber a normal 7,62*51 mm in a 6,8 barrel.

My first thought is 20% lighter than what? 20% lighter than 5.56? 7.62? 20% lighter than a convention version of itself? 20% lighter than 12 pounds of lead? (ok that’s being more than a little flippant, but you get that idea) Just seems like kind of a nebulous claim.

Guess I am just wondering how many rounds of this new ammunition could be carried for the same weight of the standard 210 of 5.56.