This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

That's HILARIOUS coming from you. You are tripping over yourself to draw connections based on (what did you call it..."loose affiliations") and then when it is clearly demonstrated that those loose affiliations tie back to YOU you are suddenly upset about the undeniable fact that you are specifically conjoined with the guy you hate based solely on the loose affiliations you used in the first place.

What exactly is my "loose affiliation" to Mao?

Fine, you want to play by those rules, don't play the "they're not me" card. Because according to YOUR rules, they are.

I don't know about Chairman Mao, but a lot of liberals tend to have an affinity towards Castro and Che. And BTW...on this site whenever someone disparaged Obama on his handling of Syria did you rush in to call them a Putin lover?

Never did, but I'm sure you're sitting on a post that you'll twist into that.

Suspected: Birther shoots two law enforcement officers [W:79, 167]

Originally Posted by rocket88

Never did, but I'm sure you're sitting on a post that you'll twist into that.

By your rules, since Putin is vaguely on the right, YOU own him.

rocket you just arent making ANY sense. Look at the thread title in THIS thread. Look at the thread title in the Las Vegas nazi cop killers thread. In both of them, a rushed attempt was made to tie the bad guys to all things conservative and you were one of the first to do it. Now you want to whine and cry when it gets put right back on you. It's comical.

Re: Suspected: Birther shoots two law enforcement officers

Originally Posted by TurtleDude

the problem with Obama is that he has been so reticent to truthfully release stuff in a timely fashion that his actions fuels all sorts of nutty conspiracy theories such as claims he is a muslim operative, that he was born in Kenya, and of course far more plausible arguments that his grades in college were woefully below normal standards of the schools that accepted him (Columbia and HLS). when someone constantly refuses to be honest or forthcoming, its reasonable for people to assume they are lying or concealing stuff

To be fair, Dubya was the only president to release his transcripts. And in his case they were already public because they were leaked 5 years earlier. The precedent of not releasing them was set long before Obama got elected.

Re: Suspected: Birther shoots two law enforcement officers

Originally Posted by Top Cat

To be fair, Dubya was the only president to release his transcripts. And in his case they were already public because they were leaked 5 years earlier. The precedent of not releasing them was set long before Obama got elected.

that's true but Obama and his toadies constantly bragged about his Law review presidency. that sort of opened that up as a legitimate line of questioning

Putin is on the right?? He's a communist and was head of the KGB! Since when has Communism been right wing? It was Ronald "Raygun" who was extreme right wing, remember?

Of course Putin joined the Communist party, how else was he going to get a job in the KGB? You think they hired anybody? Based on merit ? (He wasn't head of the whole thing, btw. Only the Berlin branch).

Putin's record since he hasn't had to pretend has not been very Communist at all. Mostly nationalist, which is vaguely right wing in global terms.