Gold Member

TragicWhiteKnight: Using that data, isn't it more logically to make this conclusion:

* Straight porn is produced largely for (white) straight men, who, in the end, are interested most in looking at the woman's reaction to size. Given most are going to be average sized, whoever's on the screen will be the Other, and who is typically cast as the Other: the black male.

* Gay porn is produced with interest in looking at male genitalia, regardless of race.

Of course, I don't really fully belief the data, because it comes across as a little racist. If you took porn films from the 70s, I'd imagine the theory would hold more truth.

Gold Member

I have cum across a lot of black guys who were lacking in the endowment area. You have to remember that all the statistics are just that... statistics. They survey a group and ask for truthfull answers. As we know, sometimes people tend to embellish their stats. They didn't go out and measure every swinging penis in the world (although I KNOW there are a number of volunteers).

Gold Member

rawkstar: I really don't understand the rumors either. In my experiences at a certain military college, the black guys are lacking (i'm straight). But in porn the black guys are the biggest. Go figure.

Gold Member

Ineligible: Just as race can get confused with genetic issues that aren't necessarily racial, so it can get confused with cultural issues. I wonder if the manufacturers of gay porn have particular trouble finding black gay porn actors, because many black men find it culturally difficult to be publicly seen having gay sex? I understand that would be true in most of Africa, but I don't know how true it might be about black Americans. If they had trouble getting actors, they'd have to take whomever they could, and couldn't be selective about them being hung.

Gold Member

longtimelurker: [quote author=Ineligible link=board=meetgreet;num=1064249012;start=0#11 date=09/22/03 at 20:48:52]I understand that would be true in most of Africa, but I don't know how true it might be about black Americans. If they had trouble getting actors, they'd have to take whomever they could, and couldn't be selective about them being hung.[/quote]

I suppose it depends how long they've been in the country for. I have heard that there is a far higher suicide rate among gay black Britons because of rejection by their families than any other racial group here.

Nothing of the sort. I'm just stating that you can't use what you see in porno movies as a point of reference for 'real life'. Ron Jeremy is about the only fat guy you see in porn. In real life, you'll likely encounter more than one fat guy.

It seems Ron Jeremy's name is becoming more and more news worthy. I had heard the name years ago, but not connected with any of the fanfair of late. He was just in Memphis, but I haven't read any reports re. penis size. Do any of you know of a recent movie/DVD showing his main subject?

Gold Member

ORCABOMBER: Hmmm, it makes me think that because most porno that's "straight" is for the entertainment of the typical white, healthy guy, most black guys are massive. Heck, they're hired for it. After all, it reinforces a sterotype and there is something "mysterious" and "otherwise about people of colour.

Gold Member

I should point out, "race and penis size" theories confuse population genetics with individual genetics, and "racial" categories are largely geographic. (In fact, at the turn of the century, there were upwards of 60-75 racial categories, mostly focusing on subdividing Europe. Messy.) Also, those correlations'll get you; pseudoscientists like Arthur Jensen, Richard Lynn, Hans Eysenck, William Shockley, JP Rushton, Seymour Itzkoff, Charles Murray, and Richard Herrnstein (That's about all of them.) make much of non-causal correlations, especially with regards to race.