My God this woman is stupid. I just read the newest version of her paper. She shows a seismograph for an earlier earthquake in Manhattan and compares it to a seismograph from one of the towers falling. She says they look suspiciously different, and suggests it was altered. Well duh, one happened from a naturally occuring seismic event, while the other from a large building collapsing, they should look different.

Charles Darwin was wrong.

You can't be serious; I'm amazed she was even allowed to teach at a University.

If she actually bothered to research things she'd have known that earthquakes initially produce seismic wave forms called P Waves, then S Waves. P for primary as these are the fastest wave forms and thus are recorded on the seismograph first and S for secondary.