A Dissenting Critique Of The
9/11 Commission Report With Alternative Recommendations
for Positive Change
by Stephen M. St. John
A Citizen Of The USA
2-1-5

YES, I AM FROM THE COLONIES AND THEREFORE NOT YOUR CONSTITUENT.
NEVERTHELESS, IT BEHOOVES YOU TO READ MY CRITIQUE BECAUSE ALL THE LIES
ABOUT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ ARE BUT LITTLE ONES WHEN COMPARED
WITH THE BIG LIE ABOUT WHAT SUPPOSEDLY HAPPENED ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001.
YOU NEED TO CONFRONT OUR MASTERS OF DECEIT LEST THEY REMAIN THE MASTERS
OF YOUR DESTINY. - Stephen M. St. John

Within hours of the 11 September 2001 crash of United
Airlines Flight 93 near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, debris that had rained
down from the sky over a wide area extending for miles from the main impact
site gave best evidence of a shootdown. Within days of the crash, reporters
from several established regional newspapers had confirmed from many eyewitnesses
the true extent of the debris field and even observations at the time of
the crash of a small, white, highly maneuverable military type jet in the
immediate area, all of which were filtered out of nationwide news broadcasts.
These testimonies were essentially buried. They remain buried. The 9/11
Commission Report simply ignores them in the very worst tradition of The
Warren Commission Report on the 22 November 1963 assassination of JFK.
One may call both reports terminally under revisionist deconstruction
(TURD); the Warren Commission Report is TURD1 and the 9/11 Commission Report
is TURD2.

For nearly three full years prior to the release of The
9/11 Commission Report the fourth estate remained strangely silent about
the lack of video surveillance evidence at the major high- security ("Category
X") international airports from which the ill-fated flights departed
on 11 September 2001. Journalists were content with repeated television
broadcasts of two Arab men passing through a security checkpoint at Portland
Maine International Airport for a flight to Boston earlier that morning.
The same dumb silence of the news media persisted after the recent release
of video surveillance tapes showing the alleged hijackers passing through
a security checkpoint at Washington Dulles International Airport. The public
broadcast of this Dulles Airport tape was nothing other than a media event
timed to precede by 24 hours the official release of The 9/11 Commission
Report. Yet few have noticed that this tape, which was provided to the
Associated Press by the South Carolina law firm Motley Rice LLC, lacks
a time stamp, which fact alone raises doubts about its authenticity. An
Australian researcher claims that the pattern of sunlight and shadow in
the background just outside the terminal door indicates mid-day rather
than early morning. Moreover, the camera selects from other passersby
two young Arab men, then follows them and zooms in on them, which indicates
human agency and motive going beyond the normal operational parameters
of airport video cameras. How can this be explained? Why is a private
law firm the custodian of such evidence properly belonging to a government
investigation?

What a weak chain of custody of evidence with respect
to all the airport video surveillance tapes for the morning of 11 September
2001! At this rate perhaps we can expect the Halliburton Corporation to
give us the Newark Liberty International Airport 9/11 tapes in 2007 and
Anderson, Arthur, Bush & Enron AOC (an alphabetical order corporation)
to hand over the Boston Logan International Airport 9/11 tapes in 2010!
Who knows? Maybe in 2020 Taliban leaders will appear in Rockefeller Center
on NBC TV's Saturday Night Live and repeat their quite reasonable offer
of October 2001 in the opening skit: "Show us the evidence and we'll
give you Osama Bin Laden!"

Debris fields do not tell lies. Withheld video surveillance
tapes speak volumes. The 9/11 Commissioners should hang their heads in
shame! They have performed very well for their masters who have brought
our great nation into an unjustified, immoral, illegal and ill-advised
invasion and occupation of two non-belligerent member states of the United
Nations and in so doing have blackened the reputation of the USA. In "connecting
the dots" in the chain of events leading up to 9/11 and recommending
ways and means to prevent such an occurrence from happening again, the
9/11 Commissioners have failed to tell us what actually happened that day.
They merely added details to the news accounts of the day. All the elements
of national sovereignty being brought to bear on their "war against
terrorism" are compromised by their lack of credibility and integrity.

The name Paul O'Neill does not appear anywhere in the
body of The 9/11 Commission Report; whereas the name Khalid Sheikh Mohammad
appears so many times it was abbreviated to KSM to reduce the length of
the report by a few pages. KSM's revelations, like much else in the report,
are mostly hearsay and were probably induced by twists and turns and naked
games under the direction of Major General Geoffrey Miller, the overseer
of interrogations in Guantanamo, Cuba and Abu Ghraib, Iraq. Or, like Emad
Salem, who, up to a certain point, helped to conduct an FBI sting operation
that went awry and resulted in the February 1993 bombing of the World Trade
Center, was KSM a U.S. Government-paid facilitator? Why are the 9/11 Commissioners
so reliant on KSM in their report when the U.S. Government refuses to allow
his free and open testimony in a courtroom in Germany in the trial of Mounir
al Motassadeq? On the other hand, former Secretary of the Treasury Paul
O'Neill gives an incisive insider's account of the thinking and motivation
of President George W. Bush and his close advisors which is very relevant
to the 9/11 investigation.

Paul O'Neill revealed to the public in January 2004 that,
commencing at his first National Security Council meeting held on 1 February
2001, just twelve days after his inauguration as 43rd President of the
USA, George W. Bush clearly and repeatedly indicated his fixation on taking
over Iraq. O'Neill's insider's account shows that George W. Bush deceived
his fellow citizens with respect to his position on Iraq and the Middle
East during his 2000 presidential campaign, which fact does not recommend
him for reelection in November 2004. Beyond that, O'Neill's testimony
is, inter alia, strong prima facie evidence of war crimes.

Bush's Iraqi obsession predated the 11 September 2001
attacks by at least eight months and probably for a year or more. Desperate
countermeasures to O'Neill's damaging testimony came later in 2004 in
the form of Bob Woodward's book, Plan of Attack, and Michael Moore's movie,
Fahrenheit 9/11; both would have you believe that the decision-making process
for the unprovoked and unjustified invasion of Iraq was entirely a reaction
to the 9/11 attacks. However, in addition to O'Neill's testimony, premeditation
in the thinking of George W. Bush and his close advisors is reflected in
Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New
Century, a document published in September 2000 by the Zionist-Neo-Conservative
oriented Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which, on page 51,
states: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic
and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." Within months of
this publication urging steps toward global military domination, most of
the Zionist Neo-Conservatives who signed onto this psychopathic utterance
held key posts in the new Bush Administration as the countdown to the "New
Pearl Harbor" of 9/11 continued. The 9/11 Commissioners did not examine
these circumstances at all.

From the southwest corner office of the 37th floor of
a building four tenths of a mile NNE from the World Trade Center I saw
the twin towers burning about ten minutes after the south tower was hit.
A colleague who earlier had been standing at the window of an adjoining
conference room saw the second jet as it approached the south tower from
a distance much further out than is commonly seen on videotapes shown on
TV. He told me with great emphasis how at first glance the jet's port
wing was pointing almost straight down to the ground while the starboard
wing pointed almost straight up. As the jet homed in on the south tower
it leveled its wings horizontally just before impact. Thus the jet was
in a sharp turn as it was aimed at the south tower in the final moments
of flight. It was traveling at a very high speed normally reserved for
cruising altitude. What all this means is that the gravitational pull
inside the cockpit was such that lifting one's hand, let alone flying the
jet, would have required prodigious effort on the part of the pilot - even
an experienced pilot. How is it, then, that a novice hijacker-pilot could
pull off this stupendous feat of daredevil aerial acrobatics when his experience
at flying big jets was limited to routine training on flight simulators?
Beginner's luck? Hardly. A more realistic explanation is that the plane
was flown by remote control in its unerring high speed arcing path to destruction.
The very same circumstances apply to the craft that hit the Pentagon.
Again, the 9/11 commissioners did not delve into these circumstances at
all, but kept to dubious newspaper accounts.

Harking back to the Zionist-Neo-Conservative principals
of the PNAC, I note that one of them, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, was the Chairman
of the International Division of System Planning Corporation (SPC), which
designs, manufactures and distributes highly sophisticated technologies
for remote control of aerial vehicles. Rabbi Zakheim left his position
at SPC in early 2001 when President George W. Bush appointed him Under
Secretary of Defense and Chief Financial Officer at the Pentagon. Thus,
as Comptroller, Rabbi Zakheim had command of the Department of Defense's
labyrinthine, bottomless accounts for six full months before the attacks
of 11 September 2001. As a Zionist, Rabbi Zakheim had an interest in putting
American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol. As signatory to a document including
a psycho suggestion that "a new Pearl Harbor" would quicken Zionist-Neo-Conservative
designs for global military dominance, Rabbi Zakheim had a motive to bring
these plans to fruition by finding or even creating such a pretext for
war. As a former corporate executive with a background in technologies
for remote control of aerial vehicles, Rabbi Zakheim had a way - remote
control of aircraft - to create "a New Pearl Harbor" which would
launch the USA into invasion and occupation under false pretext. Again,
the 9/11 Commissioners failed to take these circumstances into account
and to weigh and consider them.

Such a "false flag" intelligence operation,
in which the perpetrators artfully place the blame for their criminal act
on their enemy, would surely have enough ready, able and willing facilitators
in the Command/Control/Communications structures of the military, where
Zionist-Neo-Conservatives have very great influence. Moreover, James Bamford,
in his book Body of Secrets, gives a precedent for such outrageous, psychopathic
criminality. "Operation Northwoods" called for the killing of
fellow citizens of the USA in a false flag intelligence operation so as
to create a pretext for the invasion of Cuba and restoration of Meyer Lansky's
casinos under the guise of retaliation. Approved unanimously by the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, their "Operation Northwoods" was immediately
rejected by JFK. But this disturbing groupthink in the highest levels
of the military and intelligence communities apparently persists along
with drugs, tattooed profanity as well as anti-Arab and anti-Moslem sentiment.
The 9/11 Commissioners, having not learned from history, did not even
look here, even though the elements of motive, means and opportunity clearly
converged between the ears of Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

Another Zionist-Neo-Conservative, Philip Zelikow, the
Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, apparently would rather have
you believe that these Arab lads flew the planes of 9/11 even though it
is very highly doubtful that they had the ability to fly them the way they
were flown that day. Little surprise, then, that the 9/11 Commissioners
paid no attention to Andreas Von Blow, former German Minister of Technology
and Research and State Secretary of the Ministry of Defense, who gives
a very strong argument for remote control of the planes of 9/11 in his
best-selling book Die CIA und der 11 September: Internationaler Terror
und die Rolle der Geheimdienste. Indeed, a computer about the size of
a small refrigerator can control as many as eight aircraft simultaneously,
and can even take over the controls of an aircraft already in flight.
Such a computer can be deployed just about anywhere: in another aircraft,
in an office building, in a truck or van or boat. Furthermore, I myself
have found that sabotage by remote control is the most likely explanation
for two other air disasters that also just happen to correlate with the
national security interests of the Zionist state: the crash of a U.S.
Air Force EC-135N on 6 May 1981 and the 31 October 1999 crash of EgyptAir
Flight 990. The loss of the EC-135N entailed loss of key training personnel
in the AWACS program even as a debate raged on Capitol Hill over the Reagan
Administration's proposed arms package for Saudi Arabia which included,
over vociferous Zionist objections, five AWACS jets. When the EgyptAir
Boeing 767 went down, so did a significant number of high ranking Egyptian
military officers. They had just been participating in U.S.-sponsored
armaments programs which David Bar Ilan, the Communications Director of
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called "a dire threat" to
the Zionist state. Were these mysterious crashes precursors of the remote
controlled flights of 9/11? If these are wild and outrageous conspiracy
theories, why didn't the 9/11 Commissioners take the bull by the horns
and dispose of the matter? Why didn't Mr. Zelikow involve Rabbi Zakheim
and Herr Von Blow in the investigation?

Waleed Ash-Shehri, who, according to the 9/11 Commissioners,
was a "muscle" hijacker aboard American Airlines Flight 11, was
interviewed by the BBC on Sunday, 23 September 2001. He is a pilot with
Saudi Arabian Airlines. He denied that he was the hijacker that the Zionist-oriented
Murdoch-Zuckerman-Sulzberger media empire said he was. He even somewhat
audaciously denied to the BBC that he was dead! Several other named hijackers
came forward in the European and Arab press to deny involvement in the
"terrorist attacks of 9/11." Why didn't the 9/11 Commissioners
confirm or refute these published reports? Why did they take their cues
so subserviently from the Murdoch-Zuckerman-Sulzberger media empire? The
9/11 Commissioners failed to consider the interests of the international
community by limiting their true audience to President Bush, members of
Congress, the military and intelligence communities and club members of
the military-industrial complex.

Huntleigh USA handled security at Boston Logan International
Airport where, as previously stated, there is a curious lack of video surveillance
documenting the hijackers boarding the jets of 9/11. Huntleigh USA is a
subsidiary of a Dutch corporation, ICTS International, whose board of directors
just happens to consist of nationals of the Zionist state with the single
exception of the comptroller, a Dutchman. A "technical correction"
added to the Homeland Security Act just before its passage into law renders
this foreign actor immune from lawsuits arising from the events of 9/11.
Thus, these gatekeepers of 9/11 will never be put under oath in a court
of law to answer questions and present evidence about a breakdown in security
that ultimately led to invasion and occupation of Iraq. Is this not part
of a pattern of obstruction of justice in combination with the 9/11 Commissioners
themselves?

Carl Cameron of FOX News reported on "the dancing
Israelis" of Liberty State Park who, with apparent foreknowledge,
were filming the attacks on the World Trade Center and expressing jubilation
over the event. Cameron's in depth reporting on this and other indications
of a massive Zionist espionage operation was removed from the FOX website
but has been preserved by the Google sweeps of the Internet. Again, the
9/11 Commissioners gave this serious matter no consideration whatsoever.
Nor did they address the warning given to New York employees of the Israeli
messaging service Odigo two hours before the attacks on the World Trade
Center a few blocks away. That the Mossad is expert at forging passports
and identities was out of the 9/11 Commissioners' scope; they only had
to consult with the governments of Argentina, Canada or New Zealand to
confirm this very relevant fact.

Copious photographic evidence indicates that World Trade
Center 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by explosions within these buildings.
Testimonies from personnel of the New York Fire Department tell of explosions
inside these buildings. Radio transcripts and written affidavits of members
of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Police Department tell
of explosions inside the twin towers including in the basement (www.thememoryhole.com/911/pa-transcripts/).
Recovery teams noted molten steel at the foundations of all three of these
buildings. Steel girders there were still glowing "cherry red"
seven full weeks after 9/11 according to LiRo on-site engineering staff
(www.liro.com/lironews.pdf). Burning jet fuel and burning office paraphernalia
cannot melt steel or even make it glow. Yet the 9/11 Commissioners conveniently
sidestep these crucial facts which support a conclusion of controlled demolition
as the cause of the collapse of these buildings. No wonder! Such a conclusion
brings us further away from the bogeyman in a tent or cave in Afghanistan.
A security lapse occurred on the weekend before 9/11 when engineers had
access to the World Trade Center during an unprecedented "power-down"
which is another strange circumstance ignored by the Commission.

The 9/11 Commissioners rely on cell phone calls for evidence
of what transpired aboard the jets of 9/11. However, cell phone calls
are impossible to make from a jet flying above 8,000 feet. Even from below
this threshold they are impossible to make if the jet if flying at or near
500 miles per hour. This is because the signal cannot adjust fast enough
to connect with successive transmission towers on the ground. Therefore,
these fabrications must be totally rejected; when you rule out the impossible,
you are that much closer to the truth, no matter how unbelievable it may
seem upon first consideration. The 9/11 Commissioners also depend on air
phone calls for evidence. While air phone calls are technically possible,
such calls must be carefully scrutinized in light of the fabricated cell
phone calls. In addition, the previously mentioned technologies for remote
control of aerial vehicles are so highly sophisticated that control of
an aircraft's communications system cannot be ruled out. Certain intelligence
agencies have been known to possess technology enabling a person's voice
to be duplicated electronically for the purpose of impersonation.

In conclusion, I find that The 9/11 Commission Report
is so faulty and incomplete that it is impossible for me to put my trust
in it. I believe that the 9/11 Commissioners have, either wittingly or
unwittingly, covered up a highly successful false flag intelligence operation
designed to create a pretext for invasion and occupation of Afghanistan
and Iraq in fulfillment of the well-known Zionist-Neo-Conservative plan
to secure the Zionist state and to take the first step toward military
dominance worldwide. The cardinal principle of the 9/11 Commissioners
is to save President Bush embarrassment. The 9/11 Commission proved itself
to be a mere adjunct to the worst kind of propaganda put forth by the mainstream
news media. As a countermeasure to this unfortunate development, I make
my own alternative recommendations for positive change.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1) My first recommendation comes in the form of a challenge
to President George W. Bush, former Texas Air National Guard part-time
jet fighter pilot and to John Lehman, former U.S. Navy jet fighter pilot
and a 9/11 Commissioner: Let both of these men take the same routine training
that the alleged 9/11 hijackers took on flight simulators for big commercial
jets. Then have Bush and Lehman duplicate on their very first real flight
on a Boeing 767 and Boeing 757 the truly amazing precision flying evinced
in the attacks on the South Tower of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Let balloons be deployed to simulate these 9/11 targets. Then let us
see if they, with their professional aviation backgrounds, can hit these
targets not straight on, but on a sharp, descending curve, as our inexperienced
Arab terrorist hijackers have been accused of doing. To make this exercise
more fun, let the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and
The Economist magazine predict the outcome according to market fluctuations,
particularly on the options markets in advance of the Lehman Bush Boeing
Transparency Challenge. Let Airbus award the Servo Flight Director Prize.

2) Let there be a complete, impartial and independent
investigation into what actually took place on 11 September 2001 rather
than a long, tedious train of circumstantial evidence indicating predisposition,
activities and movements of suspects without consideration of other outside
actors. Let this new investigation take into account the Talmudic teaching
that a Jew cannot inform on another Jew to a non-Jew, which is at variance
with the adversarial process of our legal system as well as an effective
hindrance in uncovering Zionist intelligence operations designed to put
the Arabs in a bad light. Also, let this new investigation avoid altogether
the word "reportedly" which the 9/11 Commissioners used no less
than 63 times. Loose use of language is conducive to imprecise thinking,
which leads to shaky conclusions. The lowest form of journalese does not
belong in a report of such great importance.

3) Let there be a review of the FBI vis vis its treatment
of eyewitnesses in the investigation of the TWA Flight 800 shootdown on
17 July 1996. Hundreds of eyewitnesses claimed they saw what they thought
was a missile streaking up to the Boeing 747 right before the explosions
that brought the plane down south of Long Island, New York. One witness
saw the glow of the afterburner of this rocket from Norwalk, Connecticut,
about 60 miles away, which rules out a mere shoulder-launched rocket.
But the observations of these many citizens were totally ignored in the
final report on the incident. This abuse of the citizenry of the USA has
repeated itself with suppression of 11 September 2001 eyewitness accounts,
including those of another jet and a debris field extending for miles from
the primary crash site of United Airlines Flight 93 as mentioned above.
Whoever was filtering out valid eyewitness accounts from day one shares
to some degree the guilt of those who took aim at the Twin Towers and the
Pentagon and TWA Flight 800.

4) Let there be a reopening of the investigation into
the assassination of JFK, which would be apt for the times. Elected in
1960, by 1961 JFK was locked in a bitter behind-the-scenes struggle with
the Zionist state's Prime Minister David Ben Gurion over the Zionist state's
nuclear weapons program that had been started at Dimona in the Negev in
1956. This fact was brought to light more than three decades later, in
1991, with the publication of Seymour Hersh's The Samson Option, in chapter
8, "A Presidential Struggle." JFK wanted to end the Zionist
state's nuclear weapons program because he foresaw that such a program
would only result in an arms race for countervailing weapons of mass destruction
in the region. This sound policy ended with his assassination on 22 November
1963 according to the best wishes of James Jesus Angleton, who occupied
the CIA's "Israel desk" and was an afficionado of the Zionist
state's nuclear weapons program. Angleton, who was also head of the CIA's
counterintelligence division, kept files on the falsely accused Lee Harvey
Oswald long before the assassination took place, according to researchers
James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease in their book The Assassinations: Probe
Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X. Moreover, Federal Bureau of Investigation
memos of FBI Director John Edgar Hoover (29 November 1963) and of FBI Special
Agent Graham W. Kitchel (22 November 1963) reveal the future President
of the USA George Herbert Walker Bush in Dallas on the day of the JFK assassination
and helping to promote the misleading pro-Castro profile of the falsely
accused Lee Harvey Oswald so that the Warren Commission would feel compelled
to lie to the world under the pretext that it was preventing World War
III with Castro's sponsor, the former Soviet Union. We have come full
circle now with Bush's son using the same office of President of the United
States to wage unjustified war on the false pretext of removing Iraq's
non-existent weapons of mass destruction. Deeply rooted treason and corruption
have prevented a just and truly comprehensive peace in the Middle East
including a region from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers free from weapons
of mass destruction.

5) Let there be a lessons learned session for the 9/11
Commissioners who failed to include respect for international law and treaty
obligations in their enumeration of the elements of national power: diplomacy,
intelligence, covert action, economic measures, law enforcement, foreign
aid, public diplomacy, military efforts and homeland security. Their focus
is on building a proverbial better mousetrap to catch terrorists so as
to replace the one that quite mysteriously did not work on 9/11. They
do not have sufficient sense of introspection to ask themselves the question
posed by the Platinum Corollary of the Golden Rule: We know what they
have done to us; what have we been doing to them?

6) Let the governments of the United States and New
York State and New York City make Governors Island in New York Harbor available
to the United Nations for dual use as the formal headquarters of the Military
Staff Committee and as a ready-made campus for an International Military
Academy where military professionals from around the world can meet to
study and develop and promulgate protocols and procedures in support of
decisions taken by the Security Council which require international enforcement
action per Chapter 7 of the Charter of the United Nations. Such an arrangement,
which can easily coexist with the Fort Jay and Castle Williams national
monuments, befits the rich history and military tradition of this national
treasure symbolizing the evolutionary growth and remarkable destiny of
the United States. More importantly, such an arrangement will be a demonstration
of a renewed commitment by the United States to its most important treaty
obligation ever undertaken and a sorely needed way to formulate and coordinate
the practice of peacekeeping and to distribute the burdens thereof among
all the states members of the United Nations. Let the USA lead as a sovereign
equal among sovereign equals according to a solemn agreement among the
nations and not as a self-appointed constabulary force according to the
schemes of the big spenders at the PNAC!

7) Let the Secretary General of the United Nations
exercise Article 27.3 of the Charter of the United Nations which requires
a member of the Security Council to abstain from voting in the Security
Council whenever this body deliberates on disputes to which such member
is a party. Such a measure would put an end to the abusive use of the
veto power long exercised by the United States to stall enforcement of
Security Council Resolution 242, which is as old as the erstwhile Twin
Towers of the World Trade Center, having been adopted into law when the
foundations for these buildings were put in place. Likewise, such a measure
will hinder the United States from exercising other Security Council resolutions
before the ink is dry or even before the document is ratified! The unremitting
bias of the USA in favor of the Zionist state has poisoned relations among
states, which is a problem that needs correction. International law is
the true shield of the Palestinian people. Why deny them this shield?

8) Let the people of the United States be reminded
that the law of the land, The Constitution of the United States, provides
in Article VI that "all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under
the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land."
This includes our most important treaty which brought into existence the
United Nations. We have solemnly declared to abide by the Charter of the
United Nations, which, in Article 25, states: "The Members of the
United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security
Council in accordance with the present Charter." Therefore, when
Zionists lead the USA into circumventing Security Council Resolution 242
as they have consistently done for nearly four decades, they are flouting
not only the Charter of the United Nations but the Constitution of the
United States as well! Why does the President of the USA, upon taking
office, take the following oath or affirmation: "I so solemnly affirm
that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,
and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution
of the United States"? For what purpose? Make no mistake about it.
The Zionists are pulling on the very foundation for a just and lasting
peace in the Middle East.

9) Let the term "anti-Semitism" be fully
understood. Arabs and real Jews descend from Noah's son Shem from whose
name comes the derivative term "Semite." However, Ashkenazi
Jews are the converted descendants of Khazars and are thus mainly of Turkic
extraction. Ashkenazi Jews descend from Japheth, Shem's brother, and therefore
they are not Semites. Both the Ashkenazi Jews and the real descended by
blood Jews, the Sephardim, share genetic traits from a common ancestor,
Noah, but of the two only the Sephardim are Semites. And so it is quite
ironic that these converted Khazar Jews coined the misleading and manipulative
term "anti-Semite" during their long sojourn in central and eastern
Europe. This is not to dispute the validity of the Khazar conversions
to Judaism but rather to warn that the dire prophecies of Ezekiel apply
to the Ashkenazi Jews whom the prophet referred to as Gog, their prototype
descended from Japheth. Moreover, Ezekiel foretold that a remnant of one
sixth of Gog would descend from the north onto the mountains of Israel,
which came to pass after the Nazis nearly exterminated this group. The
heart of the problem today is that Christian Zionists, whose support is
so crucial to the Zionist state, confuse the prophesied arrival of Gog
in Palestine with the prophesied return of both the House of Judah and
the House of Israel to this land. In short, the Ashkenazi Jews have usurped
the name of Israel. Hence the Almighty's command to the prophet Ezekiel:
"Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the
Lord God; In the day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou
not know it?" This is the great reality check. Know a tree by its
fruit: apartheid walls; psychological walls; ethnic cleansing; transferrals;
collective punishments; unheard-of atrocities; out and out repudiation
of international law; corruption in high places; wishing the untermenschen
would just go away; etc. etc.. The United States has put its money on
the wrong horse!

10) Let us recognize the spiritual problem besetting
the USA, whose foreign policy reflects the modus operandi of the Mafioso
statesman Sam Giancana: "Don't ever forget that I'm the 'Justice
of the Peace.' If they do what I want, we'll take care of them. If
they don't, well, we'll take care of that too." To bribe foreign
nationals is to pass the cup of treason, which is the polar opposite of
JFK's aim to "pass the torch of freedom." Winston Churchill's
1921 advice to "bribe the Arabs" -revealed in Tom Segev's One
Palestine, Complete - is a topping example of where corruption will lead
in the long run. We are on the same path right now in Iraq as George W.
Bush follows in his hero's footsteps.

11) Let the people of the United States jettison its
partyocracy and replace it with a true democracy that includes the option
to abstain in each and every category on the voting card. In this way,
variables of abstentions will confound prognosticators whose incestuous
relationship with the voting process has been described in great detail
in Votescam: The Stealing of America by James and Kenneth Collier.

12) Stop the stultification of the American people by
reinvigorating the news media. Let the government create its own news
media separate from the rest so it can generate its own propaganda openly
and not by stealth through the offices of highly paid yes-men posing as
journalists. Thus far the bright lights of our news media haven't even
identified the need for an adequate explanation for the missing airport
video surveillance tapes of 9/11. This is but one example of systemic
failure due to political control.

13) Pull all US and UK troops out of Iraq by the end
of 2004 and substitute them within a three months transition period with
forces from Arab League member states under the direction of the United
Nations, which will draw on a restitution fund provided by the United States
and the United Kingdom.