Return of the Trump Asylum Directive blocked by the 9th Federal Court

The Trump government's offer to immediately reintroduce asylum rejection for those entering the US illegally was rejected on Friday by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

The San Francisco-based court ruled in a 2: 1 ruling that the policy was likely "incompatible" with the existing law.

This was the final setback for the Trump administration in a court that "shamed" President Trump last month over a series of decisions against his policy. [19659003] "Because you can not win if you tell us, a case in the ninth circuit," Trump told reporters on November 20 outside the White House. "Every case is filed in the ninth circuit … we'll be beaten, and then we'll have to go to the Supreme Court."

TRUMPZ TERMINATED ̵

1; INCREDIBLE & # 39; CLOSE TO DUBBING IT RUBBER -STAMP FOR HIS FOES

In Friday's ruling, the 9th Circle was described attempt by the Trump administration to restore the asylum pole icy as an attempt to bypass Congress.

"As we often recall "Legislative of the Bank," as well as the executive law of the Oval Office, "the 9th Circuit Judge wrote in the majority opinion," Bybee was appointed to his seat by his former President George W. Bush.

We are often reminded, "Legislative of the Bank," this may not even the executive of the Oval Office. "[19659009] – Judge Jay Bybee, 9th US Court of Appeals

It was about Trump on 9. November anyone who is the border between the US and Mexico Asylum seekers' asylum claims had been ruled out when the caravans emigrated closer to the US through Mexico.

However, a lower court judge temporarily blocked the ban and later refused to reinstate the ban. The government appealed to the 9th State Circuit to stop the Judge Jon Tigar's order of November 19

trumpet for major rulers of the Liberal 9th ​​District Court

in a dissenting opinion from Friday, The 9th Circuit Judge Edward Leavy, who was nominated by President Ronald Reagan, said the government had "adopted legal methods to deal with the current problem at the southern border rampant."

In his verdict of November 19, Tigar concluded the legal groups arguing that the federal law is clear that immigrants can apply for asylum in the US, regardless of whether or not they have entered legally.

The verdict led to a public dispute between Trump and the colonel's Supreme Court Justice John Roberts after Trump dismissed Tigar as an "Obama judge."