Microsoft Japan “Convinces” TV Station To Remove Segments Covering Gates’ Population Control Activities

According to the second largest newspaper in Japan, Microsoft mogul Bill Gates “expressed annoyance over a Japanese TV program that spread rumors he was “conspiring to control the world population” through his efforts to promote vaccinations.”

Apparently, Gates’ annoyance in regards to this matter carries far. After a 12-minute segment was aired in which Gates’ vaccination campaigns were presented as the population control efforts they are, TV Tokyo Corporation was compelled to assure Microsoft Japan that it would “remove the questionable parts from rebroadcasts and DVD releases, Microsoft Japan officials said.” The Japanese paper reported[1]:

“Microsoft Japan Co. asked TV Tokyo Corp. for a meeting to explain the thinking behind the Nov. 2 installment of “Yarisugi Toshi Densetsu Special 2012 Aki,” saying the company was deeply shocked by the misleading content.”

The article continues:

“On the Nov. 2 show, the emcee entertainer spent about 12 minutes floating such theories as “Bill Gates has devised a ghastly program on humanity” and “Rumors say he is attempting to use vaccines to control the world population.””

Bill Gates also told The Asahi Shimbun that “dispelling such misinformation about vaccinations would help to save the lives of millions of children. He said he wants TV viewers to understand the real situation.”

A TV Tokyo representative admitted that after talking to Microsoft Japan, the TV station: “We will draw on the latest feedback for our future work.”, after which it removed the segments deemed as “questionable” from rebroadcasts and DVD releases.

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

The question as to why Gates, through Microsoft Japan, was so passionate to make the Japanese TV station remove stories on possible nefarious purposes behind vaccination campaigns worldwide, is answered by the many bloggers posting messages calling on people to refuse vaccinations against uterine cervical cancer on the “erroneous grounds that the shots would cause sterility.”, the Japanese newspaper reports.

Not too long ago, Bill’s wife also attempted to convince people that everything is fine- and that all skepticism in regards to her and her husband’s Foundation is life-threatening. During a speech she gave at the TEDx Change in Berlin on April 6 of this year, Gates characterised all criticism of the Foundation’s adventures in the third world as dangerous, especially the charge that the foundation is actively but covertly involved in population control. Gates described the charge as so dangerous in fact, that the criticism“has led to much suffering and death.”

“Some people worry that the real goal is to control populations.”, Gates stated. “All these side issues have attached themselves to the core idea that men and women should be able to decide when to have a child. As a result, birth control has almost disappeared from the global health agenda.”, the audience was told.

“The greatest victims”, Gates continued, “have been in sub-Saharan Africa and the poorest parts of South Asia which contraceptives are frequently unavailable.”

Gates also said that “some people think contraceptives are code for abortion, which they’re not. Some people are uncomfortable because contraceptives have to do with sex.”

Speaking of “code” at a 2006 gathering of top globalists[2] devoted to the “family planning agenda” under the umbrella-name “Demographic Dynamics and Socio-Economic Development”, professor of Medical Demography at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, John Cleland, admitted to the fact that they should cease using coded language when communicating to the general public. The gathering was attended by the usual suspects. Representatives were present of the United Nations Population Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation, the European Commission, the World Bank and, last but not least, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

“No more shrouding our statements in code.”, the professor said. “Because code just confuses people.”, the professor said (page 33 in the document).

Cleland went on to say: “It does this cause no service at all to continue to shroud family planning in the obfuscating phrase “sexual and reproductive health”. People don’t really know what it means. If we mean family planning or contraception, we must say it. If we are worried about population growth, we must say it. We must use proper, straightforward language. I am fed up with the political correctness that daren’t say the name population stabilization, hardly dares to mention family planning or contraception out of fear that somebody is going to get offended. It is pathetic!”

To people who cannot believe dear Bill and Melinda would ever engage in deceiving an audience, let alone force information down the memory hole, I always recommend reading Henry Kissinger’s 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200 in which the fiend wrote:

“(…) economic and social progress resulting from population control will (…) contribute to the decline in fertility rates” and “we cannot wait for overall modernization and development to produce lower fertility rates (…)”.