Abstract

The article deals with the results of prudential supervision implementation in terms of financial institutions risk management, the financial institution’s activities reporting data by supervision types (insurance companies, credit unions pawn shops, subjects of non-state pension provision, etc.) in the dynamics from 2014 to 2017 was analyzed. The authors defined the changes in the indicators of influence measures application in terms of prudential supervision on non-reporting in the terms defined by the legislation, for failure to comply with standards, and failure to comply with previously applied influence measures.