Are YOU a Loser Liberal? Read on and Find Out

Our friend Dean Baker at the Center for Economic and Policy Research has a new book out with the provocative title The End of Loser Liberalism: Making Markets Progressive.

You can download the book for free HERE. You can also listen to an online discussion of the book this Sunday from 5-7 pm by clicking HERE (You will have to register with firedoglake to participate in the discussion). Let us know what you think of the discussion by writing a comment on this blog post.

And read on to learn the core argument of Dean's book and why we at the Keystone Research Center are NOT loser liberals.

In Dean's own words, the core argument of his book is that:

Progressives need a fundamentally new approach to politics. They have been losing not just because conservatives have so much more money and power, but also because they have accepted the conservatives’ framing of political debates. They have accepted a framing where conservatives want market outcomes whereas liberals want the government to intervene to bring about outcomes that they consider fair.

This is not true. Conservatives rely on the government all the time, most importantly in structuring the market in ways that ensure that income flows upwards. The framing that conservatives like the market while liberals like the government puts liberals in the position of seeming to want to tax the winners to help the losers.

This ‘loser liberalism’ is bad policy and horrible politics. Progressives would be better off fighting battles over the structure of markets so that they don’t redistribute income upward. This book describes some of the key areas where progressives can focus their efforts in restructuring market so that more income flows to the bulk of the working population rather than just a small elite.

Dean’s argument lines up with the Keystone Research Center’s view that the issue is not market vs. government, but how policies and institutions shape marketplace competition and its outcomes (this overlap is why we're NOT loser liberals — phew!).

Will we have constructive competition (based on innovation, increasing productivity, and rising living and environmental standards) or destructive competition that lowers wages and despoils the planet?

Will we structure markets so that companies take the “high road” to profitability or the “low road”?

Will we build a “moral economy” with marketplace competition that supports American values or an economy which destroys the American Dream of upward mobility? (For a recent policy discussion on how to make markets progressive, see the end of The State of Working Pennsylvania 2011.)

Go online Sunday and let us know what you think. And start experimenting with Dean’s reframing in your own communications.

Comments

0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to
approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;

contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;

solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;

may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or

are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.