Some bloggers recently have been debating what, if any, ethics the Weblog community should follow. Since not all bloggers are journalists and the Weblog form is more casual, they argue they shouldn't be expected to follow the same ethics codes journalists are. But responsible bloggers should recognize that they are publishing words publicly, and therefore have certain ethical obligations to their readers, the people they write about, and society in general.

CyberJournalist.net has created a model Bloggers' Code of Ethics, by modifying the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics for the Weblog world. These are just guidelines -- in the end it is up to individual bloggers to choose their own best practices. CyberJournalist.net follows this code and urges other Weblogs to adopt this one or similar practices.

Integrity is the cornerstone of credibility. Bloggers who adopt this code of principles and these standards of practice not only practice ethical publishing, but convey to their readers that they can be trusted.

A BLOGGERS' CODE OF ETHICS

Be Honest and Fair
Bloggers should be honest and fair in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
Bloggers should:
 Never plagiarize.
 Identify and link to sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources' reliability.
 Make certain that Weblog entries, quotations, headlines, photos and all other content do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
 Never distort the content of photos without disclosing what has been changed. Image enhancement is only acceptable for for technical clarity. Label montages and photo illustrations.
 Never publish information they know is inaccurate -- and if publishing questionable information, make it clear it's in doubt.
 Distinguish between advocacy, commentary and factual information. Even advocacy writing and commentary should not misrepresent fact or context.
 Distinguish factual information and commentary from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two.

Minimize Harm
Ethical bloggers treat sources and subjects as human beings deserving of respect.
Bloggers should:
 Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by Weblog content. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
 Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
 Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of information is not a license for arrogance.
 Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone's privacy.
 Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects, victims of sex crimes and criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.

Be Accountable
Bloggers should:
 Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
 Explain each Weblog's mission and invite dialogue with the public over its content and the bloggers' conduct.
 Disclose conflicts of interest, affiliations, activities and personal agendas.
 Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence content. When exceptions are made, disclose them fully to readers.
 Be wary of sources offering information for favors. When accepting such information, disclose the favors.
 Expose unethical practices of other bloggers.
 Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.

What do you think? Is there anything you think should be added, changed or removed? Post your comments below.

In my book I argue at length that weblogs are not a new form of journalism, and shouldn't aspire to be so--I think we're stronger (and more important and more interesting) as something different, and trying to fit us into a pre-existing mold, to my mind, misses the point.

For that reason, in thinking about ethics for weblogging, I discarded the journalistic standard of accuracy and fairness. That's unrealistic, and not really in the spirit of what we're doing. The standard I arrived at was transparency, and I derived each of guideline from that principle.

I'm relatively new to the field of journalism, so forgive me if the question seems ignorant...Why is there an unwritten rule that one newspaper cannot mention another newspaper in a story, even if it involved a reporter being targeted for harassment or injured? I just don't get it.

Posted by patricia abbatoy at June 14, 2004 2:38 AM

I'm not convinced that a code of ethics will help a lot.

Some bloggers blog to participate in an internet community; for them these rules apply (indeed, most major bloggers are quite scrupulous in giving credit where credit is due).

But some blogs are there just for the notoriety and fame. They will say anything if it draws traffic/excitement. Ethics don't apply if there is 'dish' in the offing (I think Wonkette's false Kerry sex-scandal rumor-mongering falls into this category)

At most I see your list as 'Blogger's Etiquette'. Most readers can decide for themselves whether a blogger is reliable or not, and whether it matters. Many blogs are intentionally biased or slanted in one way or another; it's the constituency of a blog that decides whether the writer passes a reliability test.

The biggest advice I have for any aspiring bloggers out there is: watch what you say. Not because the government is out to get you, though that may be true. Actually, it's because eventually your mom will read your blog!

Posted by Amardeep Singh at June 17, 2004 9:09 AM

Blog Ethics

I believe there is another component of weblogs related to ethics that is being overlooked. While the ôBloggers' Code of Ethicsö is excellent, there are other potential ramifications from an ethical, legal, and libel perspective that should not be overlooked. See: http://pwebs.net/marketing/ethics/articles/internetethics.htm ôThe Importance Of Ethics On The Internet.ö In this article I go over the various aspects of publishing responsibilities mainly from a B2B and B2C website point of view.

While most find blogs fun and a large number of these are personal and of a commentary nature, nevertheless, what is written on a blog website can result in the same legal consequences of any other type of falsely written print or video media. It is very important to follow the Code of Ethics.

Tell it Like it is - But do it with Style! Just like any other type of journalism, it is very important to check and verify your sources if you have something to say that could potentially hurt or bring harm to an organization or an individual.

jimwarholic@pwebs.net

Posted by James A. Warholic at July 24, 2004 9:58 PM

Here are two more nice blog ethics rules, that are rarely subscribed to:

"I will never ban a person, or delete a comment from my blog, merely because I disagree with the person, or feel the comment is too aggressive in its advocacy of a different point of view."

"If I feel I must consider banning a person from my blog site, I will always warn and attempt to contact the person prior to blocking their ability to view, or comment on, my blog."

Portland Communique's about page suggests aiming for two sets of principles, at least for weblogs trying to do journalism. One is the previously-mentioned weblog ethics from Rebecca Blood, and the other is the list of none elements of journalism from Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel.

I realize people have been using blogs as a format for grassroots journalism, but your list is more related to that than to bloggers generally. I'm not sure that it's particularly responsible to usurp the term as you have. You have issues with journalistic arrogance, but apparently none when it comes to arrogantly co-opting a genre and format that has been around for a while as a form of personal communication.

Someone above suggested that you add not banning people to your list. Let's just keep in mind that a blog is not a public space, but is in fact a personal forum.

Posted by Rochelle at December 9, 2004 8:50 PM

What did you use as your foundation for this so-called ethics code for bloggers? Reading this, it looks like nothing more than your own personal opinion. What right do you have to foist any of this on anyone?

Let's take your last point, shall we, to "abide by the same high standards to which you hold others." You also note that the "pursuit of information is not a license for arrogance." I find both of these statements more than a little hypocrtical given the rest of your list. Do you think that what you are doing here recognizes the right of people to control their own private information? Who gives you the right to discolse so-called unethical practices of other bloggers, and how are you using the term unethical? Is it anyone who does not adhere to your made up list of rules? Just who the hell do you guys think you are, posting stuff like this as the final word on principles and integrity, as though those who follow you are better than those who recognize that you are full of garbage?

If I want to pander to people's curiosity, then I have the right to do so. There's no law in any country that says I can't. Image enhancement is only acceptable for technical clarity? Grow up! It can also be done for good fun.

Worst of all, you have not even identified any reasonable way in which a stupid list like this could possibly be enforced.

Posted by Rooty at December 17, 2004 8:42 AM

I very much like your Bloggers' Code of Ethics, and much prefer it to Rebecca Blood's code and B!X's Blood-based code.

My biggest problem with Rebecca's laudable effort is item four: "Write each entry as if it could not be changed; add to, but do not rewrite or delete, any entry." While it is true that with a standard blog accepting comments you shouldn't mess with the flow of 'conversation,' other formats are more like little magazines, or don't encourage long, threaded commentary. If there are errors or corrections or updates to an original entry, then they should be fixed/made. This is the great advantage over the hardcopy format: there is no 'final' draft!

If Ann in Blog X uses an entry of Bob's in Blog Y, she should provide an adequate blockquote in her blog. And if hers is a long analyis of Bob's long paper, she should keep a copy of Bob's paper to update/adjust her entry if Bob's paper should ever be significantly modified or should disappear from the Internet.

We must get used to the idea that the Internet frees us from the stone-tablet universe of old fashioned newspapers and magazines. THIS is the greatest single thing about it.

Tom Armstrong ... www.zenunbound.com

Posted by Tom Armstrong at January 1, 2005 6:04 PM

I very much like your Bloggers' Code of Ethics, and much prefer it to Rebecca Blood's code and B!X's Blood-based code.

My biggest problem with Rebecca's laudable effort is item four: "Write each entry as if it could not be changed; add to, but do not rewrite or delete, any entry." While it is true that with a standard blog accepting comments you shouldn't mess with the flow of 'conversation,' other formats are more like little magazines, or don't encourage long, threaded commentary. If there are errors or corrections or updates to an original entry, then they should be fixed/made. This is the great advantage over the hardcopy format: there is no 'final' draft!

If Ann in Blog X uses an entry of Bob's in Blog Y, she should provide an adequate blockquote in her blog. And if hers is a long analyis of Bob's long paper, she should keep a copy of Bob's paper to update/adjust her entry if Bob's paper should ever be significantly modified or should disappear from the Internet.

We must get used to the idea that the Internet frees us from the stone-tablet universe of old fashioned newspapers and magazines. THIS is the greatest single thing about it.

Tom Armstrong ... www.zenunbound.com

Posted by Tom at January 1, 2005 6:04 PM

Your basic premis for ethics is sound, But.
Individuales will follow their nature. From the ten comandments to City Ordinances have been attemps to regulate what a few would deem to be 'THE' right behavior. Also, attemps to control stupidity, which hasn't worked.
I think the best you can ask for with any hope of commpliance is "Do no harm" and write as if your Mom was reading your E-mail.

Posted by Anthony E. Cameron at January 13, 2005 7:49 AM

A code of ethics is unncessary. The only code of ethics that we should follow is the law. Otherwise, let the public decide which blogs get respect, by virtue of traffic levels.

Codes of Ethics are usually created when snobby people are pissed off about something and are too weak to compete on a level playing field.

I question the need for a code of ethics. The blogosphere will typically "fact-check your a**" if needed. Bad info and continued lies calls your credibility into doubt, which makes your blog a lot less worth reading. Sort of a self-correcting phenomenon.

Posted by tiffany at March 1, 2005 8:25 AM

Virtually all of this says "don't lie or be mean", and that seems plausible.

I think "Explain each Weblog's mission and invite dialogue with the public over its content and the bloggers' conduct" should simply be deleted. Many weblogs are strictly personal sites, just someone ranting about whatever they feel like ranting about, and there's no ethical or moral or otherwise requirement for every one to have a coherent mission, or to explain it, or to invite dialogue about it.

Posted by David M. Chess at March 6, 2005 1:38 PM

Geek

Posted by Bill at May 2, 2005 11:03 AM

Code of ethics, the stiffling restrictions imposed by the controllers to see to that nobody strayed too far from established thoughts and ideas.

Have you really tried to say exactly what you wanted ,in so many words, without somehow having to check whether it crossed the line and then hastily rewrote everything so that eventually what you wanted to say was never said the way you wanted it.

I agree with the ethics code unless you just have your friends look at it then it's alright. I used to have a blog but got tired of keeping up with it lol. Call it lazy or just plain being tired of remembering what you wanted to type.

Rae :)

Posted by Rae27 at June 16, 2005 1:52 PM

Excellent guidelines. Bloggers should bear in mind that proper linking and attribution is also a means of protection for them, though never a complete one. Repeating someone else's libel is still libel, even if innocently done.

Posted by secretdubai at September 22, 2005 11:53 AM

I'm curious about right to privacy issues. I've a friend who writes a popular blog that I enjoy reading. She posts various local news items and information about local neighborhood activities as well as an entertaining interior monologue style commentary about her day. However, in these commentaries she has, on occasion, posted some information about well known people, actors, authors and others who happen to live in our neighborhood. She has described rather specifically the location of their homes, where they hang out, and what their children look like, all in a kind of easy going essay style about her day. I think it's done quite innocently, if naively. She seems absolutely unaware and unconcerned that many people consider this an infringement on these people's boundaries. Could she at some point be facing some kind of legal action? She's naming these people - first and last names - describing their kids and where they live, without their consent. I guess the gossip magazines do this all the time, but isn't that part of the reason tabloid journalists are frequently sued?

Posted by tealeaf at November 2, 2005 12:20 PM

This discussion of "blog ethics" is laughable because it's predicated on the notion that journalists abide by a higher code of ethics. In the 60's journalism shifted from the reporting of raw news - providing readers with the facts so they could make informed decisions - to "interpretive journalism" - a steady diet of skewed news stories written to promote the writer's particular point of view. Of late, writers have been carrying the water for their political counterparts, beating a drum declaring Bush to be a liar, yet those same people when they quote Ted Kennedy don't remind people of Chappaquiddick with an apositive after his name like "long remembered as the felon who got away".

Bottom Line. A code of ethics would only lead the uniformed to give more credence to the entries than they deserve. Let Joe Lunchbucket interpret the merit or demerit of blog comments himself.

Posted by Ron Scott at November 13, 2005 3:05 PM

Ok, this is a late one... we're looking at a code of conduct for blogs for http://contentlabel.org - perhaps this is in fact, a great starting point - or finish if it has everything that people want.

Posted by Paul Walsh at January 11, 2007 5:37 AM

I love the blog that you have. I was wondering if you would link my blog to yours and in return I would do the same for your blog. If you want to, my site name is American Legends and the URL is:

Just another attemot to kill the concept of Blogging. Dont fuck around with individuality. If you are outta content or blogburnt take a break to avoid such worthless attempts at making Bloggers into a mindless herd of sheep.

What I write/rave/rant in my blog is my personal thot process and I'm no way gonna alter it cos some reader got offended and thinks differently.

Creates a new page for your links, marked up in the hCard, XOXO and XFN microformats.

Posted by olderking at May 13, 2007 3:11 PM

It's fun and colorful. Thanks...

Posted by sohbet at May 13, 2007 5:06 PM

I agree with the ethics code unless you just have your friends look at it then it's alright. I used to have a blog but got tired of keeping up with it lol. Call it lazy or just plain being tired of remembering what you wanted to type.

Posted by radyo at May 14, 2007 10:33 PM

www.aklimdasin.net

Posted by sohbet at May 18, 2007 1:50 PM

good thanks :)

Posted by maynet at May 21, 2007 11:54 AM

www.maynetsohbet.net

thanks

Posted by maynetsohbet at May 21, 2007 12:02 PM

G├╝zel s├Âzler

Posted by Ergin at May 26, 2007 12:00 PM

It's very good news for the developer community. I think you are in the right side now, and Netvibes platform would become the standard.

Posted by Resimler at May 29, 2007 10:51 AM

Thanks

Posted by kale kap─▒ at May 29, 2007 6:42 PM

If you want to do this just go to my blog and in one of the comments just write your blog name and the URL and I will add it to my site.

Posted by Kanalizasyon at June 1, 2007 8:09 AM

Thanks..

Posted by sohbet at June 7, 2007 3:32 PM

thanks for informations.

Posted by Resimler at June 11, 2007 5:35 AM

thanx

Posted by Oyunlar1 at June 12, 2007 10:55 AM

www.resimleri.com

Posted by ResimLeri at June 24, 2007 4:13 PM

www.sohbetnet.com

Posted by sohbetnet at June 24, 2007 5:38 PM

hi all

Posted by www.sohbeteuro.com at June 26, 2007 5:47 PM

how can this code of ethics be legalized as a standard guideline for bloggers? 'coz it seems like you are just setting your own restrictions. how did you come up with these rules? email me at myworldisanapple@yahoo.com. thanks.

I have just finished attending a Bloggers Buff in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia last Sunday. In the Forum, discussion was held on Responsible Blogging and Blogging Ethics from a newspaper editor, a journalist and a public relations practitioner for Bloggers in Malaysia.

The speakers shared similar views as stated in the above guidelines. Blogging in Malaysia is still in its infancy and bringing this issue up to new bloggers sets new standards for the practice of Responsible Blogging.

Posted by May Ong at July 9, 2007 12:33 PM

www.tammekan.com

Posted by baran at July 9, 2007 6:01 PM

web global desing blogs sites

Posted by Sohbet at July 13, 2007 5:24 PM

google web analcy site

Posted by Sohbet at July 13, 2007 5:27 PM

thanks

Posted by iddaa at July 14, 2007 6:42 PM

Hey, make this in a print friendly format thanks

Posted by iddaa at July 14, 2007 6:43 PM

I think fair reporting representing bothside views even though contrary to one another ,should be incoporated in a blog,and it should not be insulting or humiliating some one.

Posted by mahendra kumar Dash at July 19, 2007 12:32 PM

thanks

Posted by Chat at July 23, 2007 12:52 PM

Hey, make this in a print friendly format thanks

Posted by www.tatlimuhabbet.net at July 25, 2007 4:02 PM

great psot i am glad to see that thanks

Posted by arama motoru optimizasyonu at July 28, 2007 7:27 AM

thanks

Posted by Chat at July 30, 2007 3:27 PM

> Image enhancement is only acceptable for technical clarity? Grow up! It can also be done for good fun.

There's a huge difference between a blog claiming to be a high quality news source and a blog claiming to be OMG FUNNY LOL. If you can't recognize which type this list is addressed to, the internet is clearly too SERIOUS BUSINESS for you and you should take up another hobby.

Posted by JKL at August 2, 2007 11:44 AM

chat odas─▒ :)

Posted by Chat at August 5, 2007 12:26 PM

thank you Chix cute?

Posted by Muhabbet at August 6, 2007 5:30 PM

I think "Explain each Weblog's mission and invite dialogue with the public over its content and the bloggers' conduct" should simply be deleted. Many weblogs are strictly personal sites, just someone ranting about whatever they feel like ranting about, and there's no ethical or moral or otherwise requirement for every one to have a coherent mission, or to explain it, or to invite dialogue about it.

Several argued that as Blogs are personal, they have the right to themselves, and themselves only. I disagreed as many countries are putting in legislation to set limits on the public usage of the Internet, such as, politically sensitive contents, etc. It is only right to believe that blogs are personal, but subjected to the entire public opinion. Many bloggers have got themselves into troubles recently with the arm of law. I am for some rules to usage of any public media of expression. Similar to how you should dress when you are out of your home! Some people don't follow basic ethics and so there are laws on indecent exposure! Ha, Ha. Hope this adds a little humour to this tense topic.

At most I see your list as 'Blogger's Etiquette'. Most readers can decide for themselves whether a blogger is reliable or not, and whether it matters. Many blogs are intentionally biased or slanted in one way or another; it's the constituency of a blog that decides whether the writer passes a reliability test.

The biggest advice I have for any aspiring bloggers out there is: watch what you say. Not because the government is out to get you, though that may be true. Actually, it's because eventually your mom will read your blog!

Posted by ChaT S─▒hbeT at October 12, 2007 7:00 PM

At most I see your list as 'Blogger's Etiquette'. Most readers can decide for themselves whether a blogger is reliable or not, and whether it matters. Many blogs are intentionally biased or slanted in one way or another; it's the constituency of a blog that decides whether the writer passes a reliability test.

The biggest advice I have for any aspiring bloggers out there is: watch what you say. Not because the government is out to get you, though that may be true. Actually, it's because eventually your mom will read your blog!

I think this is a very smart and to the point blog. This is very fair and I will enforce it on my blog.

Posted by spectacular4114 at November 29, 2007 4:24 PM

I think that this is a good set of ethics to have when blogging. None of us want to cause any one harm (i don't know about you), but if we stick to these ethics the internet will be safer & friendlier for everyone. So go out there and be NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by Chuck Bartowski at November 29, 2007 4:36 PM

I agree with this because people should make up for their mistakes that they make so they don't mislead people into thinking things that probably didn't happen or is wrong.

Posted by (not available) at November 29, 2007 4:41 PM

I agree with the code of ethics and i think it is fair and every blogger should follow it.

Posted by cookie monster at November 29, 2007 4:43 PM

I think the code of ethics is fair. It's good to be honest and not lie. It's good to admit mistacts. You shouldn't have harm on it to other people. The code of ethics is fair.

Posted by Troy Strong at November 29, 2007 4:49 PM

thnx

Posted by sohpet at November 30, 2007 4:17 AM

hi there,

am new here and just ran through the comments. actually am facing a problem in connection with 'Blog Ethic', but my one is a bit different. i have a public blog, usually am writing about my feelings, thoughts, never any details or specific informations. i wrote a post on my feelings about everyday struggle at work. (not the real problem or the exact place or names were menshend) But today my boss sent me an e-mail to see her in her office, coz somebody from the office sent her the post and she wanted to talk about it.She told me we should solve this problem somehow, before it gets to higher level ( to her boss etc..)
Do you think it is normal to have a report because i wrote sg personal in my blog? Does 'privacy' have a meaning in this case?

I believe that there should be a code of ethics and I have another scenario that should be considered - particularly if someone is being PAID to blog: what if the "personal" information being described is in fact deceptive or outright false? For example, let's say Weight Watchers asked me to blog on my dieting progress and I wrote that I lost 50 pounds in 2 weeks on their diet (when in fact I drank lemon juice and took laxatives). Shouldn't there be some accountability and consequences in this kind of scenario?

We've sent a confirmation email to heval987@mynet.com. You must reply to this email within 10 days to activate your subscription. We require this additional step to ensure that the email address you provided is correct and belongs to you.

We've sent a confirmation email to heval987@mynet.com. You must reply to this email within 10 days to activate your subscription. We require this additional step to ensure that the email address you provided is correct and belongs to you.

I think a code of ethics is important for any blogger. If bloggers don't want to get sued for libel, copyright infringement, or anything else under the sun, they have to make sure they aren't being negligent in their actions. Even the most innocent blog post can land someone in a court room. A code of ethics would help to minimize that possibility.

Posted by R. Almares at December 16, 2008 3:19 PM

I agree with the ethics code unless you just have your friends look at it then it's alright. I used to have a blog but got tired of keeping up with it lol. Call it lazy or just plain being tired of remembering what you wanted to type.

Posted by www.gaziogluevdenevenakliyat.com at October 13, 2009 2:01 PM

I appreciate that you developed this, but you should practice proper synthax. "A Bloggers' Code of Ethics" doesn't make sense. "A" is singular, but "Bloggers'" is a plural. It would be correct to say "A Blogger's Code of Ethics". This is just a suggestion to make the site more credible, and is not intended to be offensive. Thanks!

It might not come under the rubric of ethics but putting a spam-filter on comments would show some common sense and consideration for your readers. Who on earth is going to subscribe by rss to this page when most of the comments are spam?

Transportation from home to home With advanced age differences in the services sector the best Ek┼čio─člu Transportation from home to home and can be reached. Sector due to the branches in each branch, special handling requests, packaging materials, that branch of professional trained staff team and closed boxes vehicle fleet with the hygienic conditions of services to provide policy on the assumption that success are.

www.eksioglunakliyat.com

Posted by Xstyle at May 22, 2010 4:44 PM

to home and can be reached. Sector due to the branches in each branch, special handling requests, packaging materials, that branch of professional trained staff team and closed boxes vehicle fleet with the hygienic conditions of services to provide policy on the assumption that success are.
www.penisbuyutucuhaplari.com

Posted by penis buyutucu at May 22, 2010 5:59 PM

www.vsohbet.net menzil sohbet cet ├žet

Posted by vsohbet at May 28, 2010 10:26 AM

thanks administrators good inquire

Posted by cam mozaik at May 29, 2010 8:31 AM

sohbet odalari chat sitesi wwww.senbeno.net

Posted by sohbet at May 30, 2010 12:19 PM

You really took time to explain every little bit.
Thanks againÔÇŽ

Posted by cam mozaik at May 31, 2010 4:14 PM

thanks administrators good inquire

Posted by Judysuey at June 1, 2010 10:15 PM

sadas dsadsad asd

Posted by mnyak at June 7, 2010 9:42 AM

Wonderful post on the BLOGGER CODE.. It should be posted on every forum.. ESPECIALLY to the EDITORS and MODERATORS who VIOLATE the CODE. I have know many EDITORS out there who have manipulated and used the public for their personal agenda. In the end they LOST. The public can never be fooled. So many posers out there think they have control but little do they know.. many respect the blog.. unite to PUNT the troll OUT! EXPOSE the poster for what he or she is.. EVIL.

Posted by Bluebird at June 21, 2010 11:49 AM

Throughout history, the hands are put on the fabric is beautiful, "PROCESSING

Posted by chat at June 22, 2010 8:55 PM

Thanks a lot! I am just learning Information of Subject.
Php and this was very easy to follow and helped a lot.

Posted by cam mozaik at June 28, 2010 10:49 AM

thatÔÇÖs because the still

Posted by chat at June 29, 2010 7:01 PM

I must say that OL did a wonderful sex job putting together a lovely looking group of ladies. However, i've never picked up an escort bayanlar resimli OL wondering how good the girls will look in this months edition, and I dont plan on doing that any time soon. There are plenty of other publications escort
bayanlar that wont force me to use my weak imagination nearly as
much, and that are'nt as easily accessible to young children. partner (for good
reason) Now, if i want porno izle to see beautiful women in the woods and waters of our
awesome nation, i guess i'll just have porno izle to hope that OL puts Tiffany Lakosky in next
months print!!! porno izle story comes with a young man film izle

Posted by partner at July 4, 2010 11:31 AM

Thanks your for searching and information.
An excellent blog and an excellent page

Posted by Cam mozaik at July 5, 2010 12:16 PM

www.onesohbet.com chat

Posted by chat at July 7, 2010 9:43 AM

Thanks your for searching and information.
An excellent blog and an excellent page

Posted by Cam mozaik at July 9, 2010 9:54 AM

I must say that OL did a wonderful sex job putting together a lovely looking group of ladies.

I think that the bloggers code of ethics is reasonable and makes a good point that you should be responsible about what you say and how judgmental you are. I think that all of these rules and recommendations should be followed and that a good blogger would follow them out of respect.

Posted by Kenza McKerrihan at August 25, 2010 5:13 PM

I think people should be blocked from bloging if they ask for personal info. But other than that I think it reasonable and fair. By: Sabina

Posted by Sabina Conditt at August 25, 2010 5:25 PM

I actually really like "A Bloggers' Code of Ethics'" and I don't think that anything is needing change. All of the rules are reasonable and blogging will be even more of a delight if these rules are followed.

Posted by Franny McLarty at August 25, 2010 5:52 PM

I think that the "Bloggers Codes of Ethics" has fair rules. If people use those rules more often,in my opinion, the world would be a better place! No Harm done to anyone!

Hi It's very good news for the developer community. I think you are in the right side now, and Netvibes platform would become the standard.maltepe nakliyat

Posted by evden eve nakliyat at December 11, 2010 3:30 PM

Hello... I would like to thank this beautiful site that can easily be primarily I am a turkish and turk sites, even though I follow your site as well as the release level I find very fun and nice people waiting for captions, and you'll continue to follow thank so much..

Posted by sohbet at December 16, 2010 3:26 PM

turk chat

Posted by chat at December 17, 2010 9:52 AM

very nice. thank you.

Posted by ehliyet at December 20, 2010 4:44 PM

Hello... I would like to thank this beautiful site that can easily be primarily I am a turkish and turk sites, even though I follow your site as well as the release level I find very fun and nice people waiting for captions, and you'll continue to follow thank so much..

Posted by sohbet at December 26, 2010 1:27 PM

thans

Posted by mynet sohbet at January 4, 2011 4:45 AM

Thankx

Posted by Sohbet at January 10, 2011 12:21 PM

This is true, we should abide by this rule because this is a good thing for blogging. Thanks for making this.

I would like to thank this beautiful site that can easily be primarily I am a turkish and turk sites, even though I follow your site as well as the release level I find very fun and nice people waiting for captions,

Posted by Watch TV Online at February 24, 2011 7:41 PM

thanks admin

Posted by tabela at March 10, 2011 11:28 AM

thank you
chat sitesi

Posted by chat siteleri at March 11, 2011 4:23 AM

Thanks for sharing the nice post with me,I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Nice post. Your writing style is very beautiful and your article is very attractive. You share a very useful information that is very useful for a lot peoples and it will also help for many people. Keep writing. Thanks for sharing.

Use a blog as a form of journalism that I have a basic understanding of the people, but there is more to your list of bloggers that are usually most concerned with. I can guarantee you that the word usurp hakiruttene particularly responsible. This is about as arrogantly as a form of personal communication as a form of the format, even for a time - instead of opting for the press when it comes to arrogance when you are having trouble, but apparently not.

Add to suggest that someone not on your list of people banned. Post a public place, but just keep in mind Let's in fact as a personal platform.

Post a comment

27 Weblogs reference 'A Bloggers' Code of Ethics'Do the right thingTrackback excerpt: Should bloggers, who are not, strictly speaking, journalists, have a code of ethics? The American Press Institute thinks they should and has posted a sample code on their CyberJournalist site at www.cyberjournalist.net/news/000215.php. It has three pla... [Read More]

Blogging vs. JournalismTrackback excerpt: In the years ahead, I expect to see some solo bloggers get in trouble -- and some get driven to personal ruin when they lose libel lawsuits. It's a wonder it hasn't happened yet. Steve Outing, Senior Editor, Poynter Institute This is from Pointeronline... [Read More]

where'd all of the links go?Trackback excerpt: Not that most of you would ever notice, but I removed the "links" category this afternoon. All of the posts that were solely in that category still exist, but they have been moved to more appropriate categories. Why did I... [Read More]

You mean we have to act like grownups here too?Trackback excerpt: The Poynter Institute, a school for journalists, future journalists, and teachers of journalists, publishes several online columns each day, the most popular of which has got to be Jim Romenesko's Romenesko , a combination of journalism watchdog and gossi [Read More]

Roll Your Own EthicsTrackback excerpt: In a paper prepared for the "Blogging, Journalism and Credibility: Battleground and Common Ground" conference at Harvard, the Poynter Institute's Bill Mitchell and Bob Steele propose that individual bloggers' craft their own ethics guidelines. "The ide... [Read More]

A Bloggers' Code of EthicsTrackback excerpt: I know a lot of bloggers that have to read and respect A Bloggers' Code of Ethics, specially the first item (Be Honest and Fair). It is a very great article, go read it and please use it. (via MetaFilter) Integrity is the cornerstone of credibility. Bl... [Read More]

The Rally Cry? Don't Clog My Blog.Trackback excerpt: In the long run, does mainstream media have any more credibility than blogs, or is it that we're both making the same mistakes?
Here's the message to mainstream media: Don't clog my blog.
But the message to blogs, too, is that we need to watc... [Read More]

Blogging at WorkTrackback excerpt: It was apropos in a way that I felt uncomfortably exposed a few days ago by a well-intentioned email to my account on this server as I had it in my queue to write about blogging at work. There is... [Read More]

The New York Times on Ethics and BloggingTrackback excerpt: Adam Cohen of the New York Times opines today about ethics and blogging. It's a piece that makes a few points but not particularly well, and ultimately raises more questions about Cohen than about blogging. Cohen repeatedly makes reference to... [Read More]