Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force

From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 12:53:13 EDT
Fwd Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 13:35:15 -0400
Subject: Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force
> From: "Steven Kaeser" <steve@konsulting.com>> To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force>General> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 06:41:02 -0400
<Robert's post snipped>
>While copies of the photos are apparently available for those who>wish to order them, I surprised that we have no one on the list>close enough to the University of Texas at Arlington to visit the>school and see if this is worth getting excited over.>Unfortunately, I live too far from the scene or I'd try to get to>the exhibit myself.
This was all done years ago. We used prints from the original
negatives to see if we could find anything that would help in
the identification. We did not. No words on the paper held by
Ramey and no symbols on the sticks.
The Air Force has the CIA do the same thing and they found
nothing. Had there been symbols, which would have helped
establish the Mogul explanation, the Air Force would have
announced it rather than their research produced no results.
>As I read his description, it seems that Bond has seen something>in the photos that he does not readily recall from his 1947>involvement. His position on this seems to have waffled through>the years, but the alleged evidence here are the photos and not>Bond's recollection of the events.
This question wouldn't exist except for Johnson's new story. The
photos have been examined without results.
<snip>
> I don't really believe these images can be compared to the AA>"film" or MJ-12, however. The provenance of these negatives and>images is well known, and I've seen no credible criticism of>their authenticity. On the other hand, there could be debate>over the effects of digital enhancement, which we've yet to learn>the details of.
Yes, we know where the photographs came from, but the problem is
the enhancement. Anyone with a computer and a graphics program
can produce whatever they want. The question them becomes one of
duplication. If the results can't be duplicated, then the results
are rejected.
KRandle