Financial Follies

Fiscal Policy: As chaos spreads around the world and the U.S. deficit deepens, the White House seems confused and Congress can't even pass a budget. Have we ever lived through a time of greater incompetence?

In the last two days, two key policy spokesmen for the White House have given two entirely different visions of where we're headed.

One is Paul Volcker, legendary former chairman of the Federal Reserve. At 82, he's seen a lot, and he says time is "growing short" for the nation to address its burgeoning financial problems.

"We better get started," he said in a recent speech at Stanford University. "Today's concerns may soon become tomorrow's existential crises." In particular, he warned of "uncontrolled borrowing."

The other is Tim Geithner, our youngish Treasury secretary, who brushes aside talk of fiscal Armageddon. "The important thing," he said Wednesday, "is you're seeing the U.S. in a much stronger recovery than people expected even three months ago."

The lack of clarity and absence of a unified message is stunning. Fact is, the structural deficits the U.S. faces are monumental.

By some estimates, we need to find $107 trillion over the next 75 years to fund all our promises. In the next 10 years alone, deficits will exceed $10 trillion  lifting annual debt payments by 300% to more than $900 billion a year.

Given such a grim outlook, Congress should be in crisis mode, right? Wrong. In fact, our representatives have never been more frivolous, playing on like the band in the ballroom of the Titanic, sawing on their instruments as the ocean pours in.

Despite their overwhelming majority in Congress, Democrats can't even come up with a budget. And as they dither, the fiscal picture gets worse.

Last year's shortfall of $1.4 trillion, we were told, would shrink as trillions of dollars in stimulus and bailout spending kicked in. Sorry. This year's gap will likely be even bigger.

Clearly, the only way to stop the slide is to slash spending. Yet the Hill quotes Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., as saying the chances of a budget being passed at all this year are "fading."

Not passing a budget would be, as the Hill notes, "unprecedented." So why is such a scenario even possible? Democrats don't want to pass anything that would recognize what a mess they've made of our nation's finances since they regained power in 2006.

Fiscal Policy: As chaos spreads around the world and the U.S. deficit deepens, the White House seems confused and Congress can't even pass a budget. Have we ever lived through a time of greater incompetence?

In the last two days, two key policy spokesmen for the White House have given two entirely different visions of where we're headed.

One is Paul Volcker, legendary former chairman of the Federal Reserve. At 82, he's seen a lot, and he says time is "growing short" for the nation to address its burgeoning financial problems.

"We better get started," he said in a recent speech at Stanford University. "Today's concerns may soon become tomorrow's existential crises." In particular, he warned of "uncontrolled borrowing."

The other is Tim Geithner, our youngish Treasury secretary, who brushes aside talk of fiscal Armageddon. "The important thing," he said Wednesday, "is you're seeing the U.S. in a much stronger recovery than people expected even three months ago."

The lack of clarity and absence of a unified message is stunning. Fact is, the structural deficits the U.S. faces are monumental.

By some estimates, we need to find $107 trillion over the next 75 years to fund all our promises. In the next 10 years alone, deficits will exceed $10 trillion  lifting annual debt payments by 300% to more than $900 billion a year.

Given such a grim outlook, Congress should be in crisis mode, right? Wrong. In fact, our representatives have never been more frivolous, playing on like the band in the ballroom of the Titanic, sawing on their instruments as the ocean pours in.

Despite their overwhelming majority in Congress, Democrats can't even come up with a budget. And as they dither, the fiscal picture gets worse.

Last year's shortfall of $1.4 trillion, we were told, would shrink as trillions of dollars in stimulus and bailout spending kicked in. Sorry. This year's gap will likely be even bigger.

Clearly, the only way to stop the slide is to slash spending. Yet the Hill quotes Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., as saying the chances of a budget being passed at all this year are "fading."

Not passing a budget would be, as the Hill notes, "unprecedented." So why is such a scenario even possible? Democrats don't want to pass anything that would recognize what a mess they've made of our nation's finances since they regained power in 2006.

Any budget they pass will have to tell the awful truth  that their spending has locked in deficits and debt as far as the eye can see. So they do nothing, whiling away the hours with measures such as House Resolution 1297, sponsored by Rep. Betsy Markey, D-Colo., in support of "American Craft Beer Week."

Even when they take on something serious, such as Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd's economy- and job-killing financial overhaul bill, they tack on 326 amendments, many having nothing to do with financial reform.

The bill is already a travesty of the legislative process, failing to come close to addressing the real causes of the meltdown: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Community Reinvestment Act.

Congressional Democrats have nearly ruined our nation's budgetary system. Now they're playing a stalling game, hoping we won't realize how bad things are until they're all safely re-elected in November.

The rise of the Tea Party and the healthy disgust evident at the polls on Tuesday suggest that Americans are a lot smarter than their reprobate representatives in Washington take them to be. That should be a warning to any sitting incumbent.

See Also

There is no question about whether President Obama — along with Secretary of State John Kerry and the editorial pages of many newspapers — has a particular dislike of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But there is another question: Why? And the answer is due to an important ...

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lobbied powerfully against a nuclear agreement with Iran in a well-crafted speech to Congress Tuesday. The problem is that he has now created a zero-sum game with the Obama administration, in which either the president or the prime minister seems likely to ...

Leadership: Among the world's gamier states, there seems to be a new status quo: Kill your opponent. The murder of Boris Nemtsov is the latest such barbarism. It all suggests a void from the U.S. as leader of the free world.The brazen broad-daylight assassination of Nemtsov, a former Russian vice ...

Economy: In his weekly address, President Obama railed against Wall Street for giving "bad advice" that costs American families billions a year. OK, but what about his bad policies that have cost them far more?The president used his precious radio time to lash out at financial advisers for mistakes ...

Cities: The problem with socialism, Margaret Thatcher once noted, is you eventually run out of other people's money. In progressive Chicago, that's hit home as Moody's has cut its credit rating to two grades above "junk."Chicago's finances are staggering under the weight of an unfunded pension ...

Select market data is provided by Interactive Data Corp. Real Time Services. Price and Volume data is delayed 20 minutes unless otherwise noted, is believed accurate but is not warranted or guaranteed by Interactive Data Corp. Real Time Services and is subject to Interactive Data Corp. Real Time Services terms. All times are Eastern United States. *Reflects real-time index prices.