Spiritgreen

raebee

artulo wrote:I tried a bunch of textures and none of them looked right. Since there's demand, I'll explore it again and put up a second version.

I only wish there was a good way to illustrate the fact that coconuts are non-migratory so that you'd have the best part of the joke on there. I love the idea of coconuts following some sort of migratory path. They all seem to end up in my rum and cokes is all I know.

walmazan

mab299108

Yea, I think the problem was the reference to bodily fluids. Too bad because it's a funny idea. You might be able to salvage it though. You could dump the first rainbow and the equal sign(which is text anyway), and put a ray of incoming white light. Then it would be like the prism is straining to split the white light into individual colors. Because really, that can't be easy to do...

chumpmagic

How do you get your images as signatures? I tried coping and pasting the image link (with proper formatting) in My account > signatures, but it hasn't worked the last few weeks. Hasn't worked for me yet actually.

The only way I can get it to work is if I copy and past it each time at the end of my comments (like below) until a Mod auto creates the signature for me.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

[MOD: I fixed your signature for you. You were very close. You had the URL but not the IMG. Actually, you just needed to paste the code right above this note into your signature. You can see what I did if you go look at My Account.]

Except no one said that. It is similar though, which is what they were saying - and it's hard to deny that two smiling atoms are not similar to each other, at least similar enough that woot might think twice.

Darquis

I'm not trying to pick on anyone here, but it feels like there are quite a few entries this time around basically have the name of something physicsy (like a quasar or fulcrum) and are barely related (if at all) to the concept they're supposed to convey. Which I guess is fine, since there weren't a lot of rules set down this time around, but I feel a little disappointed cuz I was hoping for some more...I don't know, physics based designs (too bad no text is in play, RESIST would have been nice to see resurface)

Darquis

apeman wrote:My design is supposed to be two positively charged particles in love with one another but the nature of physics is not letting them be together (since likes attract in real life but repel in terms of electricity). The lines around the protons represent the electric field lines used to envision the electric field at any given point in space around the protons and oddly enough create the shape of a heart to emphasize their love. Although there is no “+” sign due to the no text rule this week, the arrows pointing away from the particles conveys enough information that these are indeed two of the same positively charged atoms. Thanks for looking and don't hesitate to vote!

I really think you should also submit the one where they're electronic/outliney (posted in the other derby thread)

08riehlet

Darquis

endangeredomega wrote:Not a fan of the 'modern' version, but I like the whimsy here. however, black on asphalt doesn't always show up well, particularly fine details. (See all the complaints regarding 'Nevermore' as an example.)

ahoac89

A farmer noticed that his chickens were sick so he calls his friend who happened to be a physicist to help diagnose the problem. The physicist began scribbling madly on several notebooks. A few days later the physicist calls back and says "I have the answer, but it only works for spherical chickens in a vacuum."

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.