It is interesting how few people within the United States know who Nikola Tesla was, and how his significant contributions enabled a quantum leap from the pre-horse-and-buggy era to the Second American Industrial Revolution, complete with modern electrification, manufacturing, lighting, and a massive technological leap unparalleled before or since. For without Tesla, none of this would have transpired, regardless of what you may think or believe. I suggest that those of you who do not know or recognize the name, Nikola Tesla, get cracking and study this man, and his significant contributions, for they are enormous, in their grandeur, beauty and scope.

Tesla envisioned a world of limitless 'energy,' demonstrating the practicality and viability of such a system, first via electrification and transmission of alternating current throughout the United States, via Niagara Falls, Buffalo, and then Shoreham, Long Island. Tesla’s goal was to provide 'energy' throughout the entire planet, so that all could benefit, rich and poor alike without distinction.

Prevented and ultimately stopped by powerful Influences, who intervened, robbing him of his final accomplishment, Tesla knew that ultimately, he would prevail, for he stated before his death, "The present is theirs, but the future, for which I really work, is mine." What did Tesla work toward and what fantastic future did he envision for all humanity?

Tesla discovered an energy source without limit as abundant and measureless as ‘space-time’ itself. He discovered the ultimate ‘wheelwork of nature’ fashioned by the very Creation that contained it, hidden deep within a dimension of time, known as 4-Space. Tesla called this energy source, RADIANT ENERGY, acquiring a significant patent demonstrating the feasibility of capturing and utilizing it as a significant source directly. Today we now know that Radiant Energy is Negative Energy

With respect to the phenomenology regarding "Energy From The Vacuum" systems, of which John Bedini is a major player, I will defer to Thomas Eugene Bearden who is THE expert in this field.

----

----

In a recent email dated [October 27, 2007] Tom Bearden

explains:

Hi Les,

Great work and hang in there. It’s a little more complicated than just whopping a superbly working prototype system into a production line and into production.

That assumption is based on the present APPLIED EE approach, which – for its symmetrized systems with no excess input and use of extra vacuum energy – has been fitted over the last 100 years to millions of experiments, phenomenology tests, etc. Together with an overall mathematical model (also fitted to those experiments and parts) to describe it. Thus the EEs have reached, and practice, an APPLIED engineering art. Just doing more of what has already been established, fitted, and accurately modeled (within the limitations imposed, such as symmetrized systems only).

The moment you violate all that, you are in a new ball game. One does NOT have an overall math model that has been fitted to millions of experiments all over the world. The standard electrical and electronic parts also HAVE NOT been fitted to decades of asymmetric system performance behavior, etc.

So one has to go at a very deliberate and fairly slow pace. Otherwise, you might pick up a capacitor from China, and it performs well in your circuit. Then pick up the "same" capacitor but made in India, and suddenly it behaves differently IN THE NEW CIRCUITRY AND DYNAMIC CONDITIONS, WHERE ADDITIONAL VACUUM ENERGY IS OCCURRING.

When one looks at it with the proper perspective, the Bedinis are making remarkably fast progress – simply because John has personally performed (over the last 35 years) many thousands of phenomenology experiments, slowly and painfully accumulating an unparalleled knowledge of what "new effects" occur on the bench or are likely to occur, and how one controls or adapts each one.

Without that body of painfully accumulated "bench behavior" knowledge in the "new area of asymmetric EFTV systems", John would not be able to reliably go into production either.

Most inventors in this area have not explored such a vast array of phenomenologies as has John. Hence the usual overunity inventor, if he tries to go into production, runs into all sorts of things completely unexpected in the normal EE’s knowledge base. E.g., quantum field theory already tells us that the ongoing intense interaction of the local vacuum with the charges in one’s circuit are there and cannot be assumed away. Quoting Aitchison:

"...the concept of a 'single particle' actually breaks down in relativistic quantum field theory with interactions, because the interactions between 'the particle' and the vacuum fluctuations (or virtual quanta) cannot be ignored." [I. J. R. Aitchison, "Nothing's Plenty: The Vacuum in Modern Quantum Field Theory," Contemporary Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 357.].

"Forces, in quantum field theory, are understood as being due to the exchange of virtual quanta..." [Ibid, p. 372].

Note that in any overunity EE system, the excess energy being output is being input by the active vacuum environment, separately from the operator’s input from the power company. This means a priori that one is in a general relativistic situation, anytime one is doing overunity with his asymmetrical EE system. Note also that normal EE is totally SPECIAL relativistic, and does not even include this primary situation being utilized by the overunity inventor.

Well, this means that in any locality, where the arrangement of matter differs because physical locations differ in their mass constituents, the "pattern" of the ongoing vacuum interaction with charged matter in that local area has unique forms of dynamics in it. If one has not widely explored the phenomenology with a certain type overunity unit, then he does not actually know what could be "new reactions" occurring in a different local environment, in addition to the overunity interactions in the specific location where he has developed the unit over a period of time.

As you recall, Steorn ran headlong into that effect when they moved some working units to a distant location for some intended important demonstrations. Suddenly the units would not work at that new location.

I encountered that problem decades ago when I was working with Frank Golden outside Nashville, Tennessee. Frank had successfully built several prototype overunity systems. One in particular was interesting and working well, and was working (over about three years) at COP = 2.0 approximately.

So then Frank moved that unit from its development site in Tennessee to outside Washington D.C. Whereupon to our absolute astonishment, at the new location the unit suddenly was performing at COP