Well, he's invited and accepted to a weblogger dinner at 6:30 p.m. at Bellevue's Crossroads on Wednesday, September 17. This one will be a real wild one. Gary Cornell from APress already told me he'll be there. So has Matt Carter of MSPress. So has Joshua Allen. And we haven't even started yet. There's gonna be a LOT of really interesting geeks in town that week.

LinuxJournal compares OpenOffice.org Writer to Microsoft Word. Even says it's better. Hmm. It's not how good your word processor is. It's how well it integrates into everything else. But, can we move beyond documents yet? I use my weblog tool about 200x more often than I use Word (and I use Outlook 10x more than I use my weblog tool).

Shhh, don't tell anyone, but I'm playing with Linux. I even bought a legitimate copy of Lindows. Yeah, I know, helping out the competition by doing that, but a good platform evangelist knows the good and bad of all platforms. What should I play with next? Sun's Mad Hatter?

I just learned that Carl Franklin will be recording a session of .NET Rocks at the PDC in front of a live audience. Hmm. I remember the first time I saw Carl speak. He was the first one to show me the Internet. VBITS 94, I think.

Jeffrey Zeldman about a patent suit against Microsoft: "Eolas, the patent holder, staked its claim in 1995. Geeks and academics immediately pronounced it worthless, but this year a US judge disagreed. Thatís good news for the patent holder but rotten news for the universe."

The Washington Post called me last week and asked me to be interviewed for an article that it is working on about Steve Ballmer. I did the usual thing. Told them that I'd need to check with PR, and that I'd get back to them after getting some PR advice.

No one told me I couldn't talk, but after finding out that the only people who've been interviewed for this article so far are high-end executives I decided to turn down the request. Why? Cause I've only worked at Microsoft for four months and I really am not an authority on how Microsoft has changed under Ballmer's watch.

That said, Ballmer's regime hired me, so I love the guy! Not to mention he gave me a signed dollar back in February at the MVP summit. Gotta frame that as my "first Microsoft buck."

More seriously, Ballmer has been doing several things that I notice. He's implemented a code of ethics. He's changed executive compensation to reward execs only if customer satisfaction improves. He's changed it so that we won't get option grants anymore, but rather straight grants of stock.

He told the MVP group that I attended that he's working to fix Microsoft's legal troubles and work to regain developer and customer trust. He also told us that he goes to work every day to make people's lives better by getting them better software.

All of these things are things that I like. So, from my view, he gets high marks.

The Inquirer makes up some more about Longhorn. Dang, is this journalism? Your average weblog has more journalism on it than this. Now I know why Dave Winer started weblogging. If this is how journalists operate, it really would infuriate a small businessperson who was trying to get some informed news out about his/her products.

How much do you want to bet that someone "legitimate" repeats this as fact?

14 minutes. That's how long it takes to pitch a project to an exec (in my case I pitched to Vic Gundotra this morning) and get an approval. Whew. Things move fast. I can't imagine what it'd be like to be an exec here and have to do this on the hour every hour.

I went to my first Friday morning brown bag breakfast training today. Turns out Microsoft has open-to-any-employee training every Friday morning. Free Krispy Kreme's and training on one of the company's products. Done by a vice president no less. You know, I've been part of several companies from seven people up to 115,000 employees, and none do anything like this.

Today I learned about Exchange's instant messenger. Every Microsoft employee now has instant messaging. We've come a long way from the ICQ days. Now we have encrypted IM and nice integration with Office. I also got an answer to why there's two separate IM clients (MSN and Exchange). MSN is going to rev once or twice a year and have lots of features aimed at consumers. Our enterprise customers don't want to see revs that often, and want different features. So, we have two separate teams who are trying to do similar things, albeit for different customers.

OK, hiring managers, I'm gonna take you to task. You all have GOT to do a better job of setting expectations. My wife has been on half a dozen or so interviews and she's just had her hopes raised to too high a level only to be dashed later. One interviewer told her "oh, we have got to find you a position here, we don't want to let anyone with your qualifications go." Yeah, you can guess the answer. After three weeks of runarounds, they decided to hire someone internally.

Yesterday she interviewed at Microsoft for a temp position. The guy hiring her, and the temp agency, both said "we'll get back to you tomorrow." Sure enough, no calls. No emails. Why set expectations when you aren't gonna follow through? Far better to say "we'll make a decision sometime over the next week." But, the message seems clear: no job.

Put yourself in the candidate's position and treat them the way you'd want to be treated. Think my wife's view of Microsoft went up today? You can guess not.

I'm ragging on Microsoft a bit here, cause it's my company and I want us to always be the best in the industry on treating people well. There are a lot of people out there looking for work right now, and they'll always remember how you treated them when they were down on their luck.

Robert Scoble works at Microsoft. Everything here, though, is his personal opinion and is not read or approved before it is posted. No warranties or other guarantees will be offered as to the quality of the opinions or anything else offered here.