Mirena coil is best treatment for heavy periods, major trial shows

Posted on 11 Jan 2013

The hormone-releasing Mirena coil intrauterine device (IUD) is a better treatment for heavy menstrual periods than other conventional medical approaches, according to results of a major clinical trial led by scientists from the Universities of Birmingham and Nottingham.

The findings of the ECLIPSE study, published online today in the New England Journal of Medicine, are widely expected to change standard clinical practice.

Heavy periods, or menorrhagia, affect the lives of large numbers of women aged 25-50 years, accounting for many GP consultations and 20 per cent of gynaecological referrals in the UK. Yet to date there has been limited evidence to help women and doctors make informed choices about treatments.

The ECLIPSE trial compared the clinical effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (also known as LNG-IUS or the Mirena contraceptive coil) with other medical treatments on offer in primary care.

A total of 571 women, consulting their GPs for heavy menstrual bleeding, agreed to be randomly assigned to LNG-IUS or to another standard medical treatment, such as tranexamic acid, mefanamic acid, combined estrogen and progestogen or progestogen only.

Over two years, patient reported outcomes improved more with LNG-IUS than with other treatments, including women’s experience of practical difficulties, social, family and work life, and psychological and physical health.

Women allocated to LNG-IUS were almost twice as likely to still be using it than those taking other medication after two years. Some 49 per cent of other trial participants switched to LNG-IUS citing ‘lack of effectiveness’ as the reason for stopping other treatments.

Janesh Gupta, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of Birmingham and based at Birmingham Women’s Hospital, said: “While the interventions studied in this trial represent options available in primary care settings in the UK, insertion of IUDs is not part of primary care in all health care settings, and in some circumstances requires gynaecologist consultation. This trial should encourage the use of IUDs in primary care.

“Both LNG-IUS and usual medical treatments reduced the adverse impact of menorrhagia on women’s lives over two years but this trial shows that LNG-IUS is the more effective first choice, as assessed by the impact of bleeding on women’s quality of life.”

Joe Kai, a GP and Professor of Primary Care at The University of Nottingham, said: “We hope our results are very positive news for women and their GPs. This trial tells us not only that treatments can be effective, but also what to choose, bearing in mind a woman’s preferences for having a contraceptive IUS inserted or not.

“Heavy menstrual bleeding can be very debilitating but we know many do not seek help. We need to make women more aware beneficial treatments are available, and to offer options such as LNG-IUS more often.”

Notes to editors

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Levonorgestrel-containing Intrauterine system in Primary care against Standard treatment for menorrhagia (ECLIPSE). New England Journal of Medicine.

About the National Institute for Health Research

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is funded by the Department of Health to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research. Since its establishment in April 2006, the NIHR has transformed research in the NHS. It has increased the volume of applied health research for the benefit of patients and the public, driven faster translation of basic science discoveries into tangible benefits for patients and the economy, and developed and supported the people who conduct and contribute to applied health research. The NIHR plays a key role in the Government’s strategy for economic growth, attracting investment by the life-sciences industries through its world-class infrastructure for health research. Together, the NIHR people, programmes, centres of excellence and systems represent the most integrated health research system in the world. For further information, visit the NIHR website (www.nihr.ac.uk).).

Disclaimer

This article/paper/report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.