The system of [assigning value to statements] is essential to the structure and functioning of our society. There is a constant battle around this – the ensemble of rules according to which [valued and devalued statements] are separated and specific effects of power are attached to the former. This is a battle about the status of truth and the practical and political role it plays. It is necessary to think of these political problems not in terms of science and ideology, but in terms of accepted knowledge and power.

Here are a few propositions, to be further tested and evaluated:

Let τ be a system of ordered procedures for the production, regulation, distribution, [evaluation], and operation of statements. A system linked in a circular way with systems of power that produce and sustain it, and with the effects of power which it induces and which extend it. A regime of systems. Such a regime is not merely ideological or superstructural; its [early stage] was a condition of the formation and development of its environment.

The essential [social, political] problem for designers and maintainers of τis not to criticize its ideology or [relation] to science, or to ensure a particular scientific practice is [correct], but to ascertain how to constitute new politics of knowledge. The problem is not changing people’s beliefs, but the political, practical, institutional regime of producing and evaluating statements about the world.

This is not a matter of emancipating τfrom systems of power (which would be an illusion, for it is already power) but of detaching its power from the forms of hegemony [social, economic, cultural], within which it operated [when it was designed].