Lawmakers in Oregon are poised to decide on the Oregon Clean Energy Jobs Bill, a move to either fulfill long-held global warming commitments or press pause yet again. Policymakers might get cold feet; the usual corporate stall tactics are rolling in. But what do people in Oregon think?

72% of @PortlandGeneral customers support the goal of generating 100% of #Oregon’s electricity from #renewables by 2030.

Portland General Electric (PGE) has voiced opposition to the legislation, so it’s worth looking at PGE customer attitudes more specifically. And it looks like PGE customers would prefer PGE live up to its promises rather than put up roadblocks. One statewide survey* last summer found that:

68 percent of PGE customers said it’s important to them (either “extremely” or “very” important) that their electric utility “provides power produced from clean, renewable sources.”

A majority of Oregonians (57 percent) said they “would prefer to pay a little bit more to ensure that more of my electricity is coming from clean, renewable sources like solar, wind, and hydroelectricity” vs. 35 percent who said they “would prefer to keep paying the same rates for electricity, even if it means I won’t receive more electricity from clean, renewable sources.” (The remaining share was undecided.)

Another recent survey found:

72 percent of Oregonians who are PGE customerssupport (54 percent “strongly”) the goal of Oregon generating 100 percent of its electricity using clean, renewable sources like wind, solar, and hydropower by 2030. Only 21 percent were opposed.

The same share—72 percent (47 percent “strongly”)—say they support requiring all new sources for generating electricity to be clean and renewable as a means to increase Oregon’s use of renewable energy and reduce its use of natural gas to generate electricity. Twenty-two percent were opposed to this idea.

In *every* county across #Oregon, sizable majorities want CO2 regulated as a pollutant. #orleg #ActOnClimate

And the pattern holds in each Congressional district. On the east side of the state, in District 2, 71 percent of voters favor regulating CO2 as a pollutant. Along the coast, support is high: in District 4 it’s 75 percent (Oregon’s southwest corner); in District 1 it’s 76 percent; and in District 5 it’s 74 percent. In District 3, which includes most of Portland, support bumps to fully 81 percent. Support does drop among conservative voters, but still, majorities of Oregon Republicans—with numbers hovering just above or below 60 percent—in each of Oregon’s Congressional districts support regulating CO2 pollution.

As PolicyInteractive’s Tom Bowerman points out, “Oregon voters support climate action now at a 5:1 ratio.” In a forced choice, 77 percent chose the statement “Climate change requires us to change our way of life such as driving less or living more simply” as opposed to just 14 percent who chose “If climate change becomes a problem we can deal with it later.” Only 9 percent were undecided.

As mentioned, 61 percent of Oregon voters support a cap-and-trade program similar to those enacted by California and Canadian provinces—and similar to the legislation on the table in Salem. Eighteen percent say they are opposed to such a measure, and 22 percent were undecided. Again, political party differences shape responses on this question: 80 percent of Democrats favor a cap-and-trade policy; Republicans were split, with 35 percent support and 38 percent opposition; 50 percent of non-affiliated or third party voters support it. There is a preference for reinvesting cap-and-trade revenue to cut pollution over refunding the money to taxpayers.

Oregonians across the political spectrum and across the map may not see eye to eye on all the issues of the day, but on climate change, Oregon voters’ values—including those of PGE’s customers specifically—are clear as day.

*These polls have not been publicized, but the organizations that commissioned them agreed to share some of their findings for this article.

What do you mean by “solutions”? Doesn’t that imply that we have a problem?

There is nothing unusual about today’s climate:
It has been warmer before
It has been cooler before
There were more storms previously
There were less storms previously
The rate of change of temperature has been faster in the past.
Same for droughts & floods
Same for all the other crap the alarm industry claims.
Therefore there is noting to worry about & nothing to explain with CO2
Same for all the other lies the trillion dollar climate alarm industry spreads.

If that is not enough evidence then:
CO2 FOLLOWS TEMPERATURE and thus cannot be the cause of temperature changes.

You need more evidence:
CO2 went up from 1945(?) to 1970 as temperature declined.
CO2 went up even more from 1995 to present as temperature was stable.
Arctic warmed MORE in the early 1900s and faster than it did in the late 1990s which had much more CO2.
What do you mean by “solutions”? Doesn’t that imply that we have a problem?

There is nothing unusual about today’s climate:
It has been warmer before
It has been cooler before
There were more storms previously
There were less storms previously
The rate of change of temperature has been faster in the past.
Same for droughts & floods
Same for all the other crap the alarm industry claims.
Therefore there is noting to worry about & nothing to explain with CO2
Same for all the other lies the trillion dollar climate alarm industry spreads.

If that is not enough evidence then:
CO2 FOLLOWS TEMPERATURE and thus cannot be the cause of temperature changes.

You need more evidence:
CO2 went up from 1945(?) to 1970 as temperature declined.
CO2 went up even more from 1995 to present as temperature was stable.
Arctic warmed MORE in the early 1900s and faster than it did in the late 1990s which had much more CO2.“DebunkingClimate.com”

Stay up to date on the Northwest's most important sustainability issues.

Research Areas

Founded in 1993, Sightline Institute is committed to making the Northwest a global model of sustainability, with strong communities, a green economy, and a healthy environment. We work to promote smart policy ideas and monitor the region's progress towards sustainability.