As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Strawman?

Conspiracy theorists are constantly saying we are making a "strawman argument" whenever we say that they are accusing the New York Fire Department of being involved in the plot. "Nobody ever said that", they scream.

Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC complex, admitted on a September 2002 PBS documentary, 'America Rebuilds' that he and the NYFD decided to 'pull' WTC 7 on the day of the attack. The word 'pull' is industry jargon for taking a building down with explosives.

Update: World Trade Center 7 Imploded by Silverstein, FDNY and others

Update: People Died in WTC 7: This Makes Silverstein and the FDNY guilty of AT LEAST Manslaughter

As for AJ, yes I find it very hypocritical, how on the 9/11 aniversary, down at GZ, he denied to the hilt to Mark Roberts that he felt the FDNY were involved in the "inside job" yet now he says exactly this, in his own words.

As for AJ, yes I find it very hypocritical, how on the 9/11 aniversary, down at GZ, he denied to the hilt to Mark Roberts that he felt the FDNY were involved in the "inside job" yet now he says exactly this, in his own words.

Terrible, Terrible man for saying this.

TAM

===========================================================

Good point, but let's hope p'doh doesn't see that. According to him, Aj is a pioneer and he's going to be in the history books for being such a great man.(To p'dohs credit he is a pioneer, but more along the lines of a pioneer for the advancement of hypocritical thinking)

I wouldn't be surprised if AJ went down in history, but it won't be for being a "great man". More likely it will be for being the first man to commit suicide off the newly rebuild WTC complex, or maybe for being the first man in history to die from aluminum foil poisoning.

murdervillage Is your paper as credible as your research?If so, don't bother publishing it because it will be junk I'm sure. And you guys want to bash troofers for their errors??Any reason none of you jumped to correct murder in his error fighting for the OS?Kettle is black, eh!

Weaver: "We lost Craig Miller, an employee that we still can’t find. His body has never been recovered. People here are still grief stricken." (first quarter, 2002)

Steve Carey – SS special agent in charge or recreating task force.

"When 7 World Trade Center came down on Sept. 11, an agent on loan from Washington, special officer Craig Miller, perished, and the entire Secret Service office was buried in that building. Yet, despite the devastation, the New York Electronic Crime Task Force has stepped up its operations in credit card fraud and for Osama Bin Laden's money"

http://www.ectaskforce.org/City_Leads_Way.pdf [link expired]

"One employee, Master Special Officer Craig Miller, died during the rescue efforts. Miller was temporarily assigned to New York in preparation for the United Nations General Assembly." http://www.ustreas.gov/usss/press/pub1202.pdf

"in selfless dedication to others, Master Special Officer Craig Miller was lost in the collapse of the World Trade Center."

Uh, 2 of the 3 links you provide claim only that he died "during rescue efforts". Only one of them claims that he died in wtc7, and it's an expired link.

More importantly, when I search for that sentence on google, the ONLY sites I find which repeat it are denier sites. Not a single reputable source claims that he died in WTC7.

And you have the gall to accuse gravy of being sloppy in his research? Please. It's quite clear that this man did NOT die in WTC7. In fact, the only relation Craig Miller has to WTC7 is that HIS OFFICE was in that building. ALL of the Secret Service agents left the office in order to help with the rescue efforts in WTC1 and WTC2. Do you seriously believe this guy remained in a burning building for 6 hours, instead of getting out and trying to help victims of the first two collapses? What are you, retarded?

So here we have an example of a twoofer repeating a claim he's heard from other twoofers, without doing ANY research to determine it's validity, and using that claim to accuse someone else of not doing his research properly. The irony would be quite humorous, if such blatant stupidity weren't status-quo for the twoof movement.