I think CB is a bigger need than has been expressed. Kevin King continues to struggle with his injury. There will be a few viable CB options at #44 and if one of the offensive linemen isn't there, CB might be a good fallback.

I think CB is a bigger need than has been expressed. Kevin King continues to struggle with his injury. There will be a few viable CB options at #44 and if one of the offensive linemen isn't there, CB might be a good fallback.

Agree, they may have a tough call to make at 44 with a number of position options available.

Turner and Madison are both solid linemen. Unless Risner, Little, or another starter quality guy falls, they may settle on development OT on day three. Taylor has a bad knee, he may be off the board.Now think about Lock, what if he falls? My word can you imagine the trades that Green Bay will be offered? (At least I would hope they get those trade request)

I think you are correct Hands about the OL prospects. Little and Risner are 2, but I'm going to add a third who I think could strongly be in play at 44. Back at the start of the combine Tony Pauline made a flippant comment on a podcast about a Packers scout telling him that the Packers had a high grade on C/G Elgton Jenkins from Mississippi State and Tony speculated that Jenkins could be an option at the end of the first round for the Packers. I wasn't crazy about that thought, but I did note that and now I don't think 44 would be a bad spot for him.

As I have stated a few times before, by signing Turner who could be the future RT, drafting a player like Jenkins if he the BPA should be on the table.

Gutey is trading up and targeting players, wonder if he offers up next year's picks to move up. Seattle is there near the top of the 2nd.

I'm personally not on board with trading future picks. But SET4YRS I could be talked into getting on the Parris Campbell bandwagon for 44 now. He is probably one of the top players on the Packers board now. Only question is will he get by 11 other picks to the Packers at 44?

Gutey is trading up and targeting players, wonder if he offers up next year's picks to move up. Seattle is there near the top of the 2nd.

I'm personally not on board with trading future picks. But SET4YRS I could be talked into getting on the Parris Campbell bandwagon for 44 now. He is probably one of the top players on the Packers board now. Only question is will he get by 11 other picks to the Packers at 44?

I looked a quite a few 2nd round mocks from today. Most had Campbell going around pick 60. If the Packers are interested they very well could have a decent shot at him. I saw one that had him as the pick. We'll see.

KC could be interested in Campbell with all the T Hill stuff going on.

Although o-line may be the way to go, doubt if they will. With the addition of Turner and Madison coupled with the fact that the new system is a better fit for Spriggs, they may be ok.I would like to see them move back a bit in an effort to get a 4th round pick back.