Google Nexus One Review

Ah, the Google Nexus One. Google’s current “flagship” Android device received an enormous amount of attention in the time leading up to its release. While definitely justified, it also came with a dose of unrealistic expectations. Admittedly, it is one of the most powerful smartphones on the entire planet (no, we won’t refer to it as a superphone), and it’s packed to the brim with the latest high-end specifications that any true geek would love. But, what’s the verdict? Well, you’ll have to read on to find out obviously. We’ve reviewed the phone with an open mind, and have also offered up some personal thoughts following the review. Just remember that violence is never the answer, ok?

Hardware

It is really remarkable how HTC has so beautifully blended a perfect mix of gigahertz processors, gorgeous and beautiful capacitive displays, and great crafted casings. We’ve got a big, bright 3.7″ AMOLED capacitive 800×480 display, a 1GHz Snapdragon CPU, 512MB of RAM, world-wide 3G, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPS, and a 5 megapixel camera with LED flash among other things, into a tight and slim 11.5mm package.

This time around, the hardware still isn’t completely perfect. The capacitive display, while excellent, doesn’t have the same response as its largest competitor in the touch screen arena. It’s not bad by any stretch of the imagination, but we feel like the 5% or so difference becomes noticeable with everyday usage. It could be a combination of hardware and software (and most likely is) but for the most part, the average user will have no issue rapidly switching through homescreens, flicking through email, or firing off text messages on the large and responsive display.

One other annoyance is the touch-sensitive buttons below the screen, however. They seem to be the exact same as what’s on the HTC DROID Eris, and we are having the exact same issues. Their contact point seems to sit a little higher than it should, so if you press the button normally from the bottom half, your touch probably will not register. You have to hit it at exactly the right point — the top 25% — and even then you may hit the screen instead because it’s right there, sitting 1mm above, after all. The haptic response also isn’t entirely comforting as is on the Motorola DROID, whose touch-sensitive buttons are the most friendly we’ve ever used.

The trackball as a navigational input device is fine — it’s a trackball that’s been used on many, many devices for many years. Is it necessary? Probably not, but we gather that some people prefer anything physical they can “count” on in this day and age of all touch, no feel.

Software

And, unfortunately we have to mosey on to the software side of things.

Android has gone through a pretty big transformation between now and over a year ago. There’s built-in Exchange (contacts and email only) support, Facebook, widget support, updated browser with a useless double-tap feature, voice search / commands, and many others. And while in our testing Android 2.1 worked reasonably well, we just can’t get over the fact that in addition to software inconsistencies which we’ll touch on below, there are still small slow downs and hiccups even with this 1GHz processor. That’s not good.

With that said, Android 2.1 doesn’t add too much more than what the Motorola DROID offers (that runs Android 2.0). We’ve got “live” wallpapers which are animated wallpapers for your homescreen that dynamically change based on different events: time, time of day, sound, touch — those are fun, if not a compete waste of battery. Additionally in Android 2.1, every text entry field is voice-enabled (data connection required) so you can practically say what you’d like to type, and Google will try their best to figure out what you are saying. In our limited testing it actually worked quite well in pretty low-noise environments, but your mileage will obviously vary based on your speaking patterns, accent, background noise, and other variables.

The application drawer which used to slide out from the bottom of the device no longer does so. It’s just takes a simple tap to engage your application list that beautifully fly in from behind you. Think of it as exactly the opposite transition effect that the iPhone uses. There’s also a News and Weather widget/application set which looks great and is pretty customizable. It’s definitely the best implementation we’ve seen on Android in terms of a news/weather widget, but that also speaks to how poorly 3rd party widgets and applications are designed and developed on Android as a whole. The redesigned photo gallery is visually impressive and the 3D effects with accelerometer-injected tilts are enticing. But, we’d have rather Google spent more time on perfecting other applications instead of jazzing up the photo viewer.

Don’t get us wrong, Android 2.1 comes with some improvements visually and under the hood as well, but Exchange support is still mediocre at best, and we get this incomplete feeling. Again, a “feeling.” You’ll see why that’s important.

Phone quality

If T-Mobile actually had coverage… Joking aside, the Nexus One, as a phone, is the best phone we’ve ever used. It sounds so, so great and is really refreshing to be able to have an excellent and smooth voice exchange with another party. In addition to the call sounding great on our end, the call also sounds absolutely perfect for the other person as well. Why, you ask? Because HTC has ingeniously integrated dual microphones for superior noise-cancellation. It’s been done before in other applications, in some form or another — Motorola has long had CrystalTalk — but it’s the best implementation on a phone that we’ve ever used. Literally, you could be on the busiest street in New York City with babies crying, cabs honking, wind blowing, and there’s a decent enough chance that the person you’re speaking to on the other end wouldn’t even notice. And oh yeah, it will be supported by Verizon Wireless this “Spring” so you can pair that with “America’s Most Reliable Network.”

The actual loudspeaker on the phone is decent. It’s definitely loud enough, but it’s not that clear and can get distorted pretty easily if the volume is raised up enough. With that said, calls with speakerphone enabled still were pleasant enough and both us and the poor test subject on the other end of the line had a clear enough conversation without disruption.

Screen

When you think of an AMOLED screen you probably think bright, beautiful colors, crisp, sharp detailing, and you also probably think, “that might not be the best screen to use at the beach.” And, if you thought that last part, you’d be right. The screen on the Nexus One, while gorgeous, is not usable in direct sunlight and it’s rather depressing. Getting over the sunlight issue, the screen isn’t as rich as the Motorola DROID’s display, unfortunately. We didn’t miss the actual resolution in terms of having more room, but the DROID’s display doesn’t show pixelation like the Nexus One does, and just honestly seems like a better product. Now, before you get too worked up, the Nexus One display is in and of itself great, but if you’d like to know the best of the best, it would have to be the DROID’s display.

Camera

The camera is decent, if not semi-enjoyable to use due to the speedy processor and fast photo snaps. It’s worlds better than the Motorola DROID’s camera, in both hardware and software partly in thanks to HTC (even though they aren’t known for their excellent cameras) and partly in thanks to some refinement with Android 2.1’s camera application. Unfortunately since this is a Google Experience (read: not raped by manufacturers), some of HTC’s awesome tweaks like tap to focus aren’t present. It’s such an invaluable feature for a touch screen device with a camera, and it’s a shame it’s not in here. In general, echoing our thoughts from the DROID review, though, Android’s default camera application is mediocre at best, slightly frustrating, and mildly confusing. It’s a recurring theme you’ll see in Android and in my personal thoughts coming up later later, you’ll see exactly why – one of many issues is that there isn’t a single amazing application on the Android platform.

Battery:

The Nexus One ships with a 1400mAh battery, and while you’d think that 1GHz CPU would run through that battery like a Kenyan track star, the battery actually holds up quite well. Power users are probably going to have to have a charging station visit at some point during a long day, but for regular phone, browser, email, and multimedia usage, the Nexus One actually almost lasted an entire day.

Google services

What would a “Google Phone” be without Google’s services? Everything is stuffed into Android, and Android 2.1 just as you’d expect. Obviously Google’s Gmail app is the best you’re going to get if you’re a Gmail warrior, and other Google services tightly integrated into the Nexus One (and more Android phones) you can look forward to include: Google Maps, Google Navigation, Google Voice Search, Google Contacts, Google Calendar, Google Talk, Google Voice, Google Market, Google News and Weather, and of course, YouTube.

Conclusion

The Nexus One is the best Android phone to date, and if you love your Android devices, this is the phone that beats them all. There are always going to be new handsets around the corner — HTC isn’t slowing down, Motorola is pushing forward, and countless other manufacturers are pumping out handsets — but right now, this is it. Now, if you ask us if the Nexus One is the phone for you, we’re not sure. If you’re stepping up from another basic smartphone or regular phone, there is little doubt you’ll be drawn in by the beautiful screen, the oh-so-easy Gmail and Google service integration, and a solidly built handset with amazing phone capabilities. However, if you’re coming from a BlackBerry or iPhone, we’re not sure you’ll be able to ride it out as Android still feels undercooked to us, and while the “openness” definitely shines through, we feel it might be shining a little too bright.

the 8900 isnt a 3G phone so the only takling and surfing you would do is via wifi, however the only way the Nexus One (or any android for that matter until AT&T releases their 5 this year) to talk and browse the web at the same time is via wifi. No other 3G network in the USA can talk and surf at the same time besides AT&T. And yes, i have done my research.

Allen

Huh? I’m using the Nexus 1 on T-Mo right now and I’m talking and surfing at the same time. It’s a great feature of GSM that CDMA does not have. I’m coming from the iPhone 2G and then 3GS (before that I had the Bold and BB 8700g)…Android definitely needs a little work, but the openness is fantastic if you’re a geek (I am at least). It’s a fun OS and although not as polished as the iPhone, the functionality outshines the iPhone without contest…and removable battery! I was the biggest complainer of battery life but it’s apparently normal to have “poor” life with smartphones, since we all do so much with them . Blackberry is the exception, but then again their browser is nowhere near complex as the iPhone/Android. My final verdict is that tap-to-focus should be on the N1 and the speakerphone should be improved as well, for the $530 I paid for it.

Michael

ANY phone on ANY GSM network that supports 3G can talk and surf at the same time. Not just ATT. I have my Blackberry tethered to my Netbook while talking on my Bluetooth all the time. You did not do your research.

and for that i award you no points, and may God have peace on your soul. (cut down version, i know)

Michael

let me rephrase that ANY 3G cell phone, on a GSM 3G network, that is connected to 3G can talk and surf.

treszfresh

Plz i need a phone so bad..

Roberto

i would do anything for this phone!! anything!

http://www.rapitex.com Riceman

Sounds like an excellent phone, it sucks that I live in Australia and would have to go through way too many hoops to get one. Sometime in the future maybe.

This phone is so awesome and I really want it, I believe that the touch screen is the solution to all button pressing, and I especially like the 5 mp camera in it

Ricardo

I bought a Samsung Omnia ll last year and it’s really excellent. Beautiful screen! Good camera and the best video of any phone. Very easy to type on with your finger. The only thing I do not like is that the screen is useless in bright sunlight.

http://themikewebsite.spaces.live.com Michael Hoffman

Google makes a tremendous amount of money (i believe something like 220 BILLION dollars a year) so why can’t Google give the phone out for free? It could be ad supported. It is not like their main business is selling cell phones. I smell greed coming from Google, just like any other mega-corporation. i wouldn’t buy Google’s phone, however, if it was given out for free i wouldn’t mind trying it out. I always thought Google was supposed to be leading a revolution in the business world yet they are just as bad as the other companies they criticize.

This is the worst written review on the internet. For a boy genius he must not have completed high school. I can’t stand to read sentence after sentence of terrible grammer and language. Painful.

Matt

@BGR – How is Exchange support lacking/mediocre?

marlin b

I think that the nexus one is the best android phone around. I always wanted one since the first time i saw it. I have t-mobile, and i was very happy when i found out that nexus was a t-mobile phone. I would give anything to get that phone. I tell my friends all about the specs on the phone and they really want one to. I just wish i had the best phone in the world.

logan

awesome phone. i like the size it’s not too big. it’s practical and easy to use. not as complicated as my old nokia phone. it’s responsive and email is easy to use, but games are still fun. internet is fun to use. 3G is super fast even though it’s unlocked. very happy. got my last 2 at gsmallover.com and i’m happy. very excited to see what else htc can do this year. hopefully they keep it gsm. i’m mad i missed the evo

jeepguy_1980

My comment had nothing to do with parenting, religion, or decency. I did I condone the F word. I do however think that is an unprofessional word that does not have a place in a professional “unbiased” technology review. A journalist should not allow their emotion to influence their reporting. I believe the article’s credibility was lost because the author allowed their personal emotions to run so rampant in the article and the F word is where it’s credibility ended (for me).