Author:

Share this Article

Now that nominations have closed for the Police and Crime Commissioner elections we can have a better stab at trying to work out where the battlefield might be on 15th November, a difficult task as this is the first time elections have been fought on these boundaries, turnout is likely to be derisory, the election system is Supplementary Vote (voters cast a 1st and 2nd preference), which institutionalises tactical voting, and there is an unusual pattern of candidates.

The table below shows the notional winner and second place party if the PCC boundaries had existed at the 2010 General Election, as calculated by the Police Foundation. I have also indicated whether or not there is a Lib Dem candidate and who the other candidates are.

The table is broken down into notional Lab vs Con, Lab vs LD and LD vs Con fights, ranked in order of marginality.

Police Force

2010 Notional Result

LD Cand?

Other Candidates?

Merseyside

31.2% Lab over Con

Yes

Eng Dem, 1 Ind

South Wales

19.1% Lab over Con

No

2 Inds

Gwent

17.2% Lab over Con

No

2 Ind

Greater Manchester

13.8% Lab over Con

Yes

UKIP, 1 Ind

Cleveland

12.3% Lab over Con

No

Green, 1 Ind

West Midlands

5% Lab over Con

Yes

UKIP, 4 Inds

West Yorkshire

4.6% Lab over Con

Yes

North Wales

2.8% Lab over Con

No

UKIP, 2 Inds

Nottinghamshire

1.1% Lab over Con

No

2 Inds

Derbyshire

2% Con over Lab

No

UKIP, 2 Inds

Lancashire

3.6% Con over Lab

Yes

UKIP

Humberside

6% Con over Lab

Yes

UKIP, 3 Inds

Cheshire

8.3% Con over Lab

Yes

UKIP, 1 Ind

Cumbria

8.7% Con over Lab

Yes

Staffordshire

10.5% Con over Lab

No

Leicestershire

13.1% Con over Lab

No

2 Inds

Bedfordshire

17.6% Con over Lab

Yes

EDL, 1 Ind

Warwickshire

18.1% Con over Lab

No

1 Ind

Northamptonshire

22% Con over Lab

Yes

Eng Dem, UKIP, 1 Ind

Kent

29.7% Con over Lab

No

Eng Dem, UKIP, Nat Lib, 3 Inds

Durham

21.2% Lab over LD

No

Northumbria

20.3% Lab over LD

Yes

South Yorkshire

19.4% Lab over LD

Yes

UKIP

Avon & Somerset

0.7% LD over Con

Yes

1 Ind

Dyfed-Powys

4.1% Con over LD (7.4% over Lab)

No

Devon & Cornwall

6.6% Con over LD

Yes

UKIP, 6 Inds

Norfolk

15.3% Con over LD

Yes

UKIP, 1 Ind

Dorset

15.5% Con over LD

Yes

1 Ind

Cambridgeshire

16.1% Con over LD

Yes

Eng Dem, UKIP, 3 Inds

Wiltshire

17.4% Con over LD

Yes

UKIP, 2 Inds

Gloucestershire

18.4% Con over LD

Yes

1 Ind

Sussex

18.7% Con over LD

Yes

North Yorkshire

19% Con over LD

No

Hampshire

19.5% Con over LD

Yes

UKIP, Justice, 1 Ind

West Mercia

21.6% Con over LD

No

1 Ind

Suffolk

22.1% Con over LD

No

1 Ind

Thames Valley

23.3% Con over LD

Yes

UKIP, 2 Inds

Lincolnshire

24.2% Con over LD

No

Eng Dem, 3 Inds

Hertfordshire

26.5% Con over LD

Yes

Surrey

26.6% Con over LD

Yes

UKIP, 3 Inds

Essex

28.2% Con over LD

No

Eng Dem, UKIP, 4 Inds

Some points become clear from looking at the table:

Labour only “won” 14 of the 43 PCC areas under First-Past-the-Post in the 2010 election. Four of these were marginals with majorities under 10%. This is because the boundaries tend to be drawn so that rural Tory areas outvote urban Labour ones, and two of Labour’s strongest areas, London and Scotland, won’t be electing PCCs.

The next most winnable PCCs after the ones we notionally “hold” are Derbyshire, Lancashire, Humberside, Dyfed-Powys (where we start notionally third but the Lib Dems are not standing), Cheshire and Cumbria, all with notional majorities under 10%, and then the more tricky Staffordshire and Leicestershire.

The swing in the opinion polls since the last General Election is about 7.5% based on the latest YouGov lead of 8%. If replicated on the 15th November with a uniform swing and with the Supplementary Vote system and the independent candidates having a limited impact, Labour would take all the areas down to Leicestershire, but just miss Bedfordshire and Warwickshire. In the unlikely event that this happened it would give Labour 22 of the 43 seats.

The Lib Dems only “won” one of these areas in 2010: Avon & Somerset, and that by a tiny margin over the Tories. This was when they were getting about double the percentage support the polls suggest now.

The pattern of Lib Dem withdrawals doesn’t seem to indicate any tacit deal with the Tories in that they are not concentrated in Lab vs Con marginals.

There is a geographical pattern though – the gaps in the Lib Dem field are concentrated in Wales (4 gaps), the Midlands (7 gaps) and the counties to the south and east of London (3 gaps).

Extraordinarily the Lib Dems are not running in Dyfed-Powys where they are notionally a close second, leaving this as a straight fight between Labour and the Tories, in an area Labour could win. There are three other areas which have 1950s-style elections with only the two candidates, Labour and Tory: Staffordshire (which may increase the chances Labour can win it), Durham, and North Yorkshire.

Some areas with strong pockets of Lib Dem support don’t have a candidate e.g. Kent where only last week they got over 2,000 votes in a county council by-election in Maidstone, or Essex where they have sitting MPs (Colchester).

You have to go back to the 1970 General Election to find a time when so many voters in an (almost) national election were not presented with a candidate from the Lib Dems or their predecessor parties to vote for. It makes the Lib Dems look like they are not a national party, a problem they had from the 1930s to 1970s, and means many Lib Dem voters will be faced with a “forced choice” between other parties which may get them into the habit of voting for another party.

UKIP, with 19 candidates, seem to have deliberately targeted the four most marginal notionally Tory-held areas, which may damage the Tories given how well UKIP are polling in current opinion polls.

Whilst the BNP have not managed to field candidates (perhaps too many are disqualified as they have criminal convictions?), the EDL are running in their Bedfordshire heartland and the English Democrats have six candidates.

There are no Plaid Cymru candidates, which may help Labour in the two Welsh marginals.

Labour may also be boosted by the absence of Green candidates everywhere except Cleveland. For instance there are the thousands of Green votes in the Brighton and Norwich areas up for grabs.

The “wild card” is the large number of independent candidates in what some voters may perceive to be elections for posts that should be non-partisan. They range from extremely credible candidates with policing backgrounds to no-hopers, and their ability to campaign ranges from just being a name on a ballot paper to extremely well funded and professional operation.

All-in-all this makes for a highly unpredictable set of elections, similar in feel to the old pre-1999 FPTP European Parliament elections, when large numbers of seats would change hands on a low turnout.

Firstly the Lib Dems have two MPs and not one in Sussex – holding Eastbourne as well as Lewes – and are the runners up to the Tories in 9 of the other 14 seats (i.e. everywhere other than Hastings, Crawley and the 3 Brighton and Hove seats).

Another point worth making is that main party candidates seem to be seriously downplaying their party affiliation – you’d expect this from the Lib Dems but the Labour leaflets I spent this afternoon delivering have to be examined very closely to find the word Labour in them.

Yet to see any Tory leaflets but would predict they’ll mostly follow suit.

This may well reduce the overall impact of Independents.

Alexwilliamz

Thanks Luke. Some interesting figures. It will be interesting to see what happens in light of what may be dismal turn out figures. Would we expect a strong conservative vote, as there voters might be considered to be more likely to vote, especially with regard to this ‘law and order’ election?

John Reid

Luke I adrmire you deeply ,but the Reason the BNP aren’t standing is they can’t afford it, not that some have criminal records, as have some sitting labour M.P.s and the fact that The EDl or English democrats are stnding doens’t mean there’s any link so why put them in the same paragraph,

http://warelane.wordpress.com/ Julian Ware-Lane

The English Democrats and been significantly infiltrated by the BNP to the extent that is some areas it is an effect takeover.

John Reid

Why would they want to leave the BNP,It’s not as if English Dems are bigger or better funded, infultration is away of trying to change an organsation by having power to apply it, what Power Have english democrats have, and The BNP is All for Keeping Nothern Ireland and Scotland in the UK the English dems aren’t

Latest

The pistol has been fired and the race has begun. For many Labour activists door knocking and phone banking has become a regular part of evenings and weekends as the fight to return a Labour government on 7 May intensifies. Over the past few weeks two topics of doorstep conversation have leapt out at me. One is the passion felt by people of all ages, particularly the older generation, for the NHS. The second, predictably, is public concern over immigration. […]

Last month David Cameron called for all 18- to 21-year-olds who have failed to find a job or a place in training to be forced to undertake community work. Under Tory plans those aged between 18 and 21 who have not had a job for six months will be barred from claiming benefit unless they agree to start an apprenticeship or complete community work. The plan is designed to ensure that the 50,000 young people “most at risk of starting […]

Labour candidates for Mayor will be trying to fund their campaigns in all manner of ways – but Christian Wolmar (the transport expert who joined the race first and remains the only candidate who isn’t an elected politician) has gone down the crowdfunding route. Wolmar is trying to raise £3,000 for his campaign by next week – and has currently raised nearly half of that sum. Although as with all crowdfunding, he must raise the whole sum or he gets […]

Yvette Cooper, the Shadow Home Secretary, has asked an urgent question in the Commons about abuse allegations at Yarl’s Wood. Yarl’s Wood is an immigration detention centre that opened in 2001. Ever since then guards (who come from private company Serco, which runs the facilitiy) are have faced serious accusations that there has been ongoing mistreatment of the people detained in the facility. This includes reports of sexual abuse and degrading treatment. On Monday, Channel 4 aired a documentary which had […]

75% of Labour PPCs want to see Trident scrapped, according to information collected by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). CND have surveyed 79 Labour prospective parliamentary candidates (PPCs) – which includes both current MPs and new candidates. Of those asked, 75% said they wouldn’t vote to renew Trident. This is roughly a quarter more than those who said the same in a ComRes poll for the BBC Sunday Politics in September last year (which surveyed 73 people). Meanwhile, in the CND […]