Jack Gorman, 84986 Chezem Rd., Eugene, stated he has 120 acres of land that are
adjacent to several neighbors who grow gardens and have animals. He said he has a spring
on the property that fed three homes, containing four children and seven adults. He added
because it doesn't have a state forestry number, it doesn't get looked at as domestic
water, but as runoff water. He said in 1982, Lane County passed the water system to the
homes and permits were paid for. He added they came out and inspected the water line,
passing it as domestic drinking water. He said at that time they never were instructed
that they needed a state water master number. He said currently there is a three to seven
month waiting period to get the permit passed and they are in the process of doing so. He
said the spring runs year-round and they are all concerned about their health, because of
the chemicals that they will be spraying. He said hand spraying had already taken place on
the property and in the future, they will aerial spray the 120 acres. He added he tried to
get in touch with the owners about protecting the spring, but they didn't respond.

Dwyer questioned what chemicals were going to be sprayed.

Gorman responded Velpar, Oust and Transline. He said all pamphlets described that they
should not be applied to surface or runoff water.

Cindy Dorman, 84986 Chism Rd., Eugene, said they have the application for the
permit and the water master is not adjudicating springs in the Lane County area, only in
the Klamath Valley. She said Swanson Superior needed to recognize that it is drinking
water and that they have the deeded easement that shows they have been using the water
since 1982, with a filtration system, to be used for three houses. She added on the
federal labels of the chemicals, they state they travel through soil, and under certain
conditions, contaminate groundwater which may be used for irrigation or drinking purposes.
She added they all say that drift will occur and the people applying it should know all
the windrifts of the area.

Dwyer wanted to know what type of remedy they wanted from the County in regards to this
problem.

Dorman stated she did not know how the County could help her. She said she spoke with
Peter Sorenson and he advised that if they came to this meeting, they could find out how
they could get some help.

Sorenson noted that there used to be a consumer advocacy office in County government,
where the District Attorney or other people in the County could help citizens who had a
non-criminal problem. He said he didn't know if anything could be done today, but he would
be interested in helping.

Weeldreyer wanted to know if the Board chair could send a letter to Swanson Superior
(the property owner that is conducting the activity) to state that this is an issue of
concern to Lane County residents.

Van Vactor stated it sounded like an issue where the Forest Practices Act applies and
state law is clear that local authority had been preempted. He added some sort of
communication would be fine, but the Board's authority is limited.

Dorman said she wanted the company to reassure them that they would take some
precautions around their water.

France Robinson, 85098 Chism Rd., Eugene, stated she was in support for her
neighbors, the Dormans. She added she had a well and the evidence was clear about the
pesticides that will be used. She said they are detrimental to the health of humans as
well as the animals that will drink the streams. She requested prompt action from the
Board.

Debby Telew, 30065 Le Blue Rd., said she was present for the same reason. She
added it is an area that is residential. She said the spraying is of great concern, as the
Cancer Society said no pesticides or herbicides are safe. She added hand spraying would be
better.

Robin Philips, 30169 Le Blue Rd., said when Swanson bought the property, it was
known to them that this was a populated area on all sides, with cattle grazing. She said
they should be aware that they would need to use different practices on a populated parcel
than in the wilderness area. She said hand spraying would be more expensive but it could
work. She said there is drift from the chemicals. She added she has an ill child and
doesn't know what the chemicals will do. She said she found Swanson Superior to be more
responsive than other companies that have been there. She said they deserve the option of
another way of spraying the property because it comes down to dollars. She mentioned if
necessary, they could hand spray.

Lasey Bastea, 1140 E. Van Buren, Cottage Grove, stated she attends Blue Mountain
School, across the street from Blue Mountain School Park where the proposed herbicide
spraying will take place. She said there are 55 students in the school and they do use the
park and forest on a daily basis for educational and recreational purposes. She said she
didn't agree with herbicide as a method for clearing brush. She said clearing brush is a
good idea, but there might be other methods that could be used. She urged the Board not to
vote on Order 99-3-10-1.

Leslie Rubinstein, 79296 Repsleger Rd., Cottage Grove, stated she is a Board
Member of Blue Mountain School and is a member of the South Lane School District Board of
Education. She said spraying is a bad idea. She read excerpts from "NCAP
Magazine" with regard to herbicides.

Cookie Swetland, 51599 Blue River, Vida, stated she worked with the Blue River
Community Development Corporation and asked the Board for support with the funding of
their project, the triangle at the end of Highway 126 and Cascade St. She added it is the
main portal entrance to the commercial district of Blue River. She said it is on the
capital improvement list, and if it is deemed necessary to go on the state transportation
improvement list of the STIP, they would like the Board to put it there. She said since
they are unincorporated, they need the Board's action to get it on the list. She said they
want to have an attractive and safe entrance, designed to help further their community and
economic goals. She added Dick Upton with ODOT had verbally committed some engineering
work, removal of the asphalt and hauling in of new soil, if Lane County will do the rest.
She said they need project dollars from Lane County.

Weeldreyer noted that issue had been high on the list of projects of Lane County and
the Community Development Corporation of Blue River. She added it had been on the capital
improvements project as a list of things they were going to fund. She said last year they
applied for a grant by which they could do planning. She wanted to know what the citizens
of Blue River needed from the Board.

Swetland said for the STIP list, they need the Board's support. She added that ODOT
might take it out of their maintenance money instead of project money.

Larry Mann, 2247 N. 10th, Springfield, stated he came to talk about the Metro
Sports Commission. He said the Metro Sports Commission is an intergovernmental agency
agreement between the City of Eugene, Springfield and Lane County. He said over the last
few years they had been successful. He said the commission is put together to help promote
adult and youth amateur athletics. He said it is a group that had been successful with the
Willamalane bond issue, the Eugene recreation bond and worked at getting the Gateway
Sports Complex to build the two soccer fields for Kidsports. He said they have also helped
with grants. He said he is present because Steve Cornacchia was their representative on
the Metro Sports Commission and there is a vacancy for the position. He added he is an
"at large" member on the Board and the "at large" members are voted in
through a committee, whereas the commissioner would be selected or voluntarily would be
donating their time. He said they meet once every two months, (usually the third Monday at
noon) and they are rotated through the different agencies. He said the reason there needs
to be a commissioner on the board is for communication.

Green noted that with regard to the herbicide, since it was Sorenson's suggestion, he
wanted him to draft the letter that needed to go out to Swanson Superior. He added he
would sign it after it went through legal counsel.

3. COMMISSIONERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS

Weeldreyer reported they are in the final negotiations of the Pacific Fiberlink
Consortium. She said a Board order will come to the Board regarding this on April 7. She
spoke about a letter (copy in file) regarding a grant from the U.S. Department of Commerce
for technology. She said it looks like the County will have right-of-way agreements and
everything settled by the end of March. She said she will advocate having Lane County
support the consortium, as Lane County would connect all the citizens that lie around the
route in between the incorporated cities. She said LCOG was interested in participating as
well. She added there are some cities that are uncomfortable with LCOG being both a member
and staff for this consortium. On another subject, she said she met with Westfir City
Council and it looks like the rest area at the covered bridge in Westfir is moving ahead.
She said the forest service had obtained grant funding for scenic byways. She added Public
Works Department had committed $163,000 as part of the local match when they applied for
the forest service grant. She said they also received another grant to work on the Lowell
Covered Bridge, to refurbish it and build a parking lot.

Morrison said she was confused with regard to the timeliness of mail. She wanted to
know if a certain piece of mail (regarding land use regionalization) was responded to.

Green responded that it was the Board Chair's responsibility to respond.

Sorenson said the Board should delegate handling of correspondence to Bill Van Vactor
and Mike Moskovitz (Public Information Officer). He said some things are responded to,
most things are not. He said someone from the staff, when it is appropriate, should make
some recommendations.

Van Vactor recommended using a stamp that stated: "Please reply and return within
a certain amount of time." He said it was an expeditious way to get the mail to the
appropriate person. He recommended that he and the Board chair set up a protocol for
handling correspondence. He said it will be brought back to the Board because it involves
County Administration staff.

Sorenson reported that the fees for Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (LRAPA) are
charged to business and individuals for air quality permits, are about 84% of what similar
businesses with similar permit needs are charged outside of Lane County by DEQ. He added
that puts a smaller burden on businesses in the community. He said the legislature is
considering allocating the air quality budget to DEQ. He said presently LRAPA receives
about 3% of the air quality budget and is currently negotiating with DEQ for a larger
percentage. He said Lane County has a statutory role with LRAPA in that Lane County is
required by state law to send a delegate and required to pay fees to LRAPA. He said Lane
County receives more money than it pays out.

Green said the Board will be meeting next Tuesday and Wednesday. He reported on the
trip to Washington, D.C. on the United Front effort. He said overall the trip was very
productive. He said he spoke with Peter DeFazio regarding the lack of movement around
decoupling. He said DeFazio reiterated his position, that he wanted to make sure counties
were taken care of.

Van Vactor said if the County combines federal forest and O & C receipts, it gets
more timber payments than any other county in the country. He said it is a paramount issue
for Lane County. He said he wanted the Board to revisit the subject of timber money,
figuring out a position and then contacting the senator to make him know how important it
is to Lane County.

Weeldreyer said that NACo has created a national task force on advanced
telecommunications access for rural community. She said the Parks Department had proposed
a new boat ramp down from the Goodpasture covered bridge. She said there were mixed
reviews by the citizens of Leaburg, so a task force was created. She said the citizens
asked for an inventory to see what other sites were available. She said because it is at
the headwaters of Leaburg Lake, the Marine Board had set aside a large amount of money to
put a boat landing there. She said there is a private foundation that will buy the land
that can be used as a match for the County. She added it is at a dangerous corner on the
McKenzie Highway and it is a major concern for the community. She said they will take six
weeks to do an inventory.

Van Vactor reported that Commissioner Green did a great job in front of the Senate
General Government Committee with regard to PERS, describing Lane County's problem. He
said PERS approved three of the concepts that had to do with accounting, but on
substantive issues of interest earnings to solve the problem, took no action.

Dwyer reported he received a standing ovation in Salem.

4. COMMISSIONERS' BUSINESS

UPDATE Facilities Capital Improvement Projects.

David Suchart, Management Services, reported that both of the main projects are on time
and on budget. He said with regard to the roof, the workers had removed all of the pavers
and took up all of the lining and recoated the whole area outside of the windows. He said
they will remove everything in the rock area as soon as they have another stretch of dry
days. He said they are down to one leak above Gary Ingram's office, a leak in the hallway
going to A & T and two small leaks in the tape library of RIS.

Van Vactor added that he and Green had gone to the District Attorney's office in the
past week and there was a leak there as well.

Suchart said the plan is to bring in another set of architects and have them look at
the roof.

Green commented that if the roof could be completed before May 15, that would be great,
but if it looks like it will go passed that date, to let the Board know during the monthly
updates.

UPDATE Y2K (No Material).

Rick Schulz, Budget Analyst, passed out an outline of notes (copy in file.) He reported
several committees had been formed and there are formal committee charges that have been
adopted in the past few weeks. He said the Contingency Planning Committee's charge is to
develop a service continuation plan for critical County services that could be affected by
the Year 2000 rollover. He said they included emergency preparedness and planning,
intergovernmental and non-profit sector coordination, organizational and community
information and support, business contingency and recovery planning and strategies for
monitoring Y2K activities during the week of January 1, 2000. He added department
coordinators will be the appointed people in their departments in preparing for service
continuation in the Year 2000. He said a newsletter will be going out to employees about
Y2K. He said he had been working with EWEB and the City of Eugene, coordinating efforts.
He said he wanted the Board to make a commitment to thinking about what would it would
mean if the County were to lose power and communications. He said he wants the Board's
support.

Dwyer said he fully supports this issue and reiterated the Board had made it clear
about their direction is in regard to Y2K compliance, and it is a priority. He wanted to
know where the Y2K committee needed help.

Schulz said it sounded like he does have the Board's support and it is helpful to him.

Van Vactor noted that the Management Team discussed leave around January 1 and
consensus was not to approve any leave for employees around that period of time, until
inventories and contingency plans are completed.

Green requested Gary Ingram to provide an update on what Information Services' problems
are so the Board will know.

5. EXECUTIVE SESSION as per ORS 192.660

To be held in the afternoon.

6. COMMITTEE REPORTS

Legislative Standing Committee Report.

Roy Burns, Legislative Representative, noted the status of the gas tax increase
proposal. He said hearings will start next week on the Association of Oregon Industries
Tax Package. He said that should go forward quickly next week, from house transportation
to house revenue.

Ollie Snowden, noted information from Brady Adams, describing the leadership's
proposal, a series of tables and a memo to Bill Penhallow from Randall Pozdena, from
ECONorthwest that talks about the implications of the proposed "shift and weight
mile" to diesel tax and registration fee. He said the Board adopted the AOC list of
priorities that included a conceptual approval for increased transportation fees. He asked
for a position on the transportation fees and diesel tax issues. He noted that AOC had put
together four criteria that it wants met if they are going to shift from a weight mile
method of taxing trucks, to some other method. He said the four criteria are: it must
maintain cost responsibility, must be revenue neutral, must have sustainable revenues and
maintain tax equity for Oregon firms. He said it is his opinion that the proposal included
in the legislature's package fails to meet three of those criteria (cross responsibility,
sustainability of revenues and tax equity for Oregon firms.) He said the revenue
sustainability is questionable and a move away from cost responsibility. He said it will
shift the tax burden from interstate truckers to intrastate truckers. He said at
Legislative Committee, they talked about what their Board's role could be. He said many
Oregon counties don't have the reserves that Lane County has. He said in the long term it
is wrong to go to a diesel tax registration fee system for taxing trucks.

Dwyer recommended opposition to this change. He said it will be detrimental to truckers
in Oregon. He said the Board needs to maintain its position.

Burns said he is asking the Board to affirm the four principles and have staff hold and
make sure all four of the principles that have been identified would be the basis for
continued involvement in the process.

Sorenson stated they should be pushing the cost responsibility feature of the Board's
proposal in opposing the attack on cost responsibility. He added tax equity is a serious
issue, and it is a bad idea.

Burns stated it is being touted as a diesel fuel tax change. He said to some extent it
is packaged for popular consumption. He added the trucker's proposal is a fixed fee, a
tenfold increase of registration for classifications of trucks that generate two-thirds of
the revenue. He said there is no fixed fee system to determine impact on the highways and
how it should be paid for.

Morrison stated she disagreed with Sorenson. She said she was is in favor of doing away
with the weight mile.

Dwyer said with regard to Senate Bills 511, 518, 522, 524, 628, 631, Senate Bill 12,
and House Bill 2657, he would move to approve the recommendation of the committee as
listed on this report.

Weeldreyer SECONDED.

Burns reported that this is an issue of not attempting to get out of notice, the bill
would give closure to the final decision. He said there have been a number of cases in
which an individual appealed a decision (long after any appeal period), and they had
actually begun construction of a project and it was deemed that that was the first
opportunity for notice for an affected or agreed party. He said one bill was introduced by
the Land Use and Real Estate Section of the Bar, another bill been introduced that dealt
with the same topic, and all three were being worked on. He added everyone agreed to set
up a system so they do get closure when the appeal goes before LUBA and a permit has been
issued, an individual is not caught unprepared or challenged when they are already under
construction. He said that is what this bill will accomplish.

VOTE: 4-1 (Morrison dissenting.)

Dwyer moved to support the continuation of the cost share and aspects that are laid out
in Ollie Snowden and Roy Burns' argument, that it is not in the Board's best interest to
support it even though it may be beneficial to certain businesses. He added it is a broad
public policy and important to support staff and he moved to continue to be in line with
the Engineer's Association.

Weeldreyer SECONDED.

Burns noted it is to the four principles they were holding to. He said if there is a
change, it must meet all four principles.

VOTE: 4-1 (Morrison dissenting).

7. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION

a. Announcements

None.

8. PUBLIC WORKS

a. FIRST READING AND SETTING SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING Ordinance
PA 1115 Renaming a Portion of County Road Number 740 From Locke Road
to Wildish Lane (17-03-08).

MOTION: to approve First Reading and Setting Second Reading and Public Hearing
of Ordinance PA 1115.

Weeldreyer MOVED, Morrison SECONDED.

VOTE: 5-0.

b. REPORT BACK/RESOLUTION AND ORDER 99-2-24-2
Approving a Design Concept and Acquiring Fee or Other Interests in Portions of Certain
Real Properties for Improvement of the Green Hill Road/Barger Drive Intersection, and
Authorizing Staff to Prepare a Right-of-Way Plan Necessary to Construct the Road, Pursue
all Necessary Planning Actions, Acquire Right-of-Way and Prepare Plans and Specifications
for Improvement of Said Road.

MOTION: to approve RESOLUTION and ORDER 99-24-2.

Dwyer MOVED, Green SECONDED.

Green said he was able to talk to people about his concerns and the idea was okay. He
asked Ollie Snowden to make sure there is a good high profile education process for the
intersection, as Meadowview School is located near the intersection. He asked if there
would be greater illumination in the area because of the roundabout.

Snowden reported it is not illuminated now and they don't illuminate rural
intersections unless there is a different accident problem. He added they would illuminate
this area because of the roundabout.

Dwyer noted the Roads Advisory Committee had a lengthy discussion about the
alternatives and said that this way would save a lot of wetlands.

Green said he wanted Craig Hawkins of School District 52 to be notified and Public
Works to get him information about the roundabout.

VOTE: 5-0.

c. ORDER 99-3-10-1 Authorizing the Parks
Division to Use Herbicides as Part of the Reforestation Efforts on Forest Lands Managed by
the Division.

Bob Keefer, Parks Department, noted when they rehired Woodland Timber Management for
Blue Mountain Park last January, they also discussed with the Board at that time the need
to go through reforestation efforts. He said it is his recollection from that meeting that
there was some concern by the Board that it be brought back for review. He said to him,
the key question at Blue Mountain is: "Are they going to utilize the expertise of
their consultant and look at how to grow trees the most professional and cost efficient
way under the management plan and reforestation of the area, or are they going to look at
other measures to do that?" He said if the Board wants to look for other measures,
they need to also find ways of funding as well.

Dwyer said he is concerned about the direction they were going. He said he visited the
park and was not impressed on how it was being managed. He said the problem is they try to
save money on everything they do, so they use school kids, kids from Skipworth and people
that aren't experienced in planting trees. He said the park is being managed like a cash
cow, rather than a park. He added health and welfare is more important than money.

Green noted the question is whether or not to authorize the Park Division to use
herbicides as part of the management plan.

Keefer said the Board needs to look at both sides of the agenda.

Dan Green, Woodland Management, stated he opposed a standard format for reforestation
operations. He said it is something the federal government and the State of Oregon through
their regulatory powers do. He said it is proposed to be done with ground sprays which
minimize the risk of drift. He added there are alternatives for doing it and they cost
more. He said health and safety are more important than the cost of things. He added some
other methods have shown to be more serious from chainsaws, than when people cut the
brush. He added it costs three to five times as much and tends to be ineffective when
compared to spraying. He said it is an option.

Sorenson questioned the objectives and said if the parcel of land is being managed for
wood production, it is the way to go, but if it is a County park, he wanted to know if it
was a commercially acceptable forest management operation.

Green responded the question mixes things because the whole plan is mixed. He said the
commissioners wanted a management plan that would produce the majority of the revenue that
that portion of the park area could provide, but to provide it in such a way that the
trees were harvested over a long period of time, using natural means as much as possible
to bring trees back. He added if natural means fail, the use of appropriate means will
make sure the forest is regenerated. He said that had been the plan within the past 15
years. He added it was mentioned 15 years ago that this was the riskiest part, that there
might not be the reforestation. He said with herbicides there is more of a likelihood of a
successful reforestation.

Morrison noted that the Board did adopt the Parks Plan. She added in the plan it did
identify that this particular area was one of the funding sources. She said they commended
Bob Keefer on what he was doing. She said when a management firm is hired to manage a
parcel, there is criteria that they comply with the Forest Practices Act. She said as long
as they are in compliance, and if the County is interested in managing the land for the
citizens of Lane County, the Board needs to go forward with the management piece. She
added if herbicides are part of the plan, it needs to be looked at it. She said for
national forest parks, herbicides are used. She said she has no problem with this if it is
for forest management.

Dwyer said there is money to make up the difference between the physical eradication
and the chemical application. He said the County owes a duty to the citizens to find an
alternative. He said he would rather put people to work moving brush physically, than
putting people in danger.

Keefer said with regard to having the Vegetation Management Advisory Committee work on
this issue, an issue came up in Richardson Park with regard to poison oak and at that time
it was looked at the committee determined that they were set up more for roadside issues.
He added he is willing to step back and take a hard look at it and look at alternatives
and funding opportunities for other measures and delay the spraying this year.

Dwyer echoed what Keefer said about looking for alternative money and said he wouldn't
rule out herbicides in all instances.

Sorenson suggested that the Board go to VMAC and then come back to the Board.

Green questioned whether there was an urgency today or could there be additional
sources of funding to meet the needs of other Board members.

Keefer stated the application of spraying would be delayed. He reiterated that they
would be willing to make the delay to look at other alternatives. He said he would direct
staff to come back in 90 days with alternatives.

Weeldreyer said she had concerns that were raised about the appropriate use of
chemicals and the different impacts of the uses of the property that are involved. She
said she would not be comfortable taking action today. She said in certain cases, she
believes that there are appropriate uses of chemicals, such as eradicating poison oak. She
said she would be opposed to having a total ban of any and all chemicals on County owned
property because it would not be in the long term best interest of all the people that
would be impacted by it. She said she wanted Commissioner Dwyer to work with Bob Keefer,
take some of his ideas and bring it back to the Board. She said she didn't think the VMAC
committee would want to take on the Parks Department. She said their focus had been on the
roadside maintenance system. She said work needs to be done more on a staff level.

Morrison stated she was not opposed to postponing it for another three months. She said
she doesn't think it is necessary and does not agree to sending it to the VMAC Committee
because it is not part of their charge.

Green said he would support not going to VMAC. He said he would support what
Commissioner Weeldreyer and that Commissioner Dwyer could use his influence at the state
level in getting grant money to offset the costs.

Dwyer stated he agreed and said he would work with Keefer to see where the money is
available.

Green stated that the direction for Bob Keefer is to come back in three months with an
alternative proposal. He added Commissioner Dwyer will work with him in terms of coming
back with some alternatives. He said he agreed with Morrison that it is something that the
Board should be able to take care of.

Weeldreyer suggested that Leslie Rubenstein, being a member of the South Lane School
District that operates a program at the Blue Mountain School, also be involved.

1) ORDER 99-3-10-3 Appropriating $109,000 in
Revenues and Expenditures in Fund 286 to Allow for Funding of Programs with Unexpended
Community Corrections Act Funds.

2) RESOLUTION AND ORDER 99-3-10-4 Participation in Funding Activities of the Oregon Dispute Resolution Commission.

3) RESOLUTION AND ORDER 99-3-10-5 Appropriating an Additional $7,909 in Revenue and Expenditures in Fund 286 for Individuals
with Developmental Disabilities (PAAF #52 to the 1997-99 Intergovernmental Agreement
20-001).

D. Public Safety

1) ORDER 99-3-10-6 Approving a Professional
Services Dental Contract with David A. Lester, DDS for the Purpose of Providing Dental
Services to Inmates Legally in Custody of Lane County; Duration of Contract is March 1,
1999 to June 30, 2000 in the Sum of $155 per Hour Not to Exceed $65,000.

E. Public Works

1) ORDER 99-3-10-7
Improvements to Pearl Street (County Road Number 254) Between MP 0.00 and MP 0.39
Including Assessments and Notice of Pending Lien Against Adjacent Properties.

2) ORDER 99-3-10-8 Amending the Requirements
Contract with EGR & Associates for Leachate Treatment Support Facilities in the Amount
of $67,625 and Authorizing the County Administrator to Execute the Amendment to Execute
the Contract.

3) ORDER 99-3-10-9 Vacating a Portion of a
Public Road (Norris Road) Located in Section 36, Township 16 South, Range 6 West of the
Willamette Meridian, in Lane County, Oregon, Without a Public Hearing, and Adopting
Findings of Fact (16-06-36).

4) FINAL ORDER 99-3-10-10 Vacating a Portion
of Mansfield Street, in Section 23, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette
Meridian, Without a Public Hearing, and Adopting Findings of Fact (17-03-23).

5) ORDER 99-3-10-11 Vacating the Public Alley
Located in Block 12 of Heceta Beach, as Platted and Recorded in Book 7, Page 25, Lane
County, Oregon Plat Records, Without a Public Hearing, and Adopting Findings of Fact
(18-12-04-42).

6) ORDER 99-3-10-12 Accepting a County
Opportunity Grant from the Oregon State Parks and Recreation Department for Campground
Improvements to Harbor Vista Campground and Delegating Authority to the County
Administrator to Sign the State/Local Agreement.

F. Workforce Partnership

1) ORDER 99-3-10-13 Submitting a Request to
the Governor for Designation of Lane County as a Workforce Investment Area Under the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-220).

G. County Administration

1) ORDER 99-3-10-16 Award of Bid LCP 98/99 -
08 for Mapleton Water System Improvements.

MOTION: to approve Consent Calendar.

Weeldreyer MOVED, Green SECONDED.

VOTE: 5-0.

10. MANAGEMENT SERVICES

a. ORDER 99-3-10-14 Appointing Three (3)
Members to the Lane County Human Rights and Affirmative Action Advisory Committee.

Hector Rios, Management Services, reported there were three vacancies for the Human
Rights and Affirmative Action Advisory Committee. He said they have conducted all the
interviews and are presenting the committee's recommendations for the Board's approval. He
added this group was the toughest pool of candidates that he had seen in the past three
years. The applicants chosen were Dwight Lee, Adrian Rodriguez and F. Nadia Sindi.

Green added he was impressed with the number of qualified candidates and hoped the
others who were not chosen would stay interested.

Dwyer said he was also impressed by the broad array of experience.

MOTION: to approve ORDER 99-3-10-14.

Dwyer MOVED, Morrison SECONDED.

VOTE: 5-0.

11. PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL

b. ORDER 99-3-10-15 Reappointing Two Members
to the Public Safety Coordinating Council (PSCC).

MOTION: to approve ORDER 99-3-10-15.

Morrison MOVED, Sorenson SECONDED.

VOTE: 5-0.

12. EMERGENCY BUSINESS

None.

Green noted the only assignment was that Sorenson prepare a letter about the
herbicides.

Van Vactor added there is a report back in 90 days about Blue Mountain Park and he and
Green will work on processing mail.

There being no further business, Commissioner Green adjourned the meeting at 3:00 p.m.