Archives|WHAT EMMA COLLINS SAID.; THE CASSINA CASE IN COMMON PLEAS. CHARGES OF DUPLICITY AGAINST THE GIRL'S PARENTS--HER CONFESSIONS TO THE CUBAN'S LAWYER--JUDGE VAN HOESEN'S RULING. NO LIGHT THROWN ON THE SUBJECT. BURGLARS ATTEMPT TO ROB A BANK.

Site Search Navigation

Site Navigation

Site Mobile Navigation

WHAT EMMA COLLINS SAID.; THE CASSINA CASE IN COMMON PLEAS. CHARGES OF DUPLICITY AGAINST THE GIRL'S PARENTS--HER CONFESSIONS TO THE CUBAN'S LAWYER--JUDGE VAN HOESEN'S RULING. NO LIGHT THROWN ON THE SUBJECT. BURGLARS ATTEMPT TO ROB A BANK.

New and rather surprising statements were made in court yesterday with reference to the Collins-Cassina scandal, which has hitherto run the gantlet of a Police Court, and has been full of astonishing disclosures. Two civil suits are at present pending against Nicholas Cassina. View Full Article in Timesmachine »

We are continually improving the quality of our text archives. Please send feedback, error reports,
and suggestions to archive_feedback@nytimes.com.

A version of this archives appears in print on July 31, 1878, on Page 2 of the New York edition with the headline: WHAT EMMA COLLINS SAID.; THE CASSINA CASE IN COMMON PLEAS. CHARGES OF DUPLICITY AGAINST THE GIRL'S PARENTS--HER CONFESSIONS TO THE CUBAN'S LAWYER--JUDGE VAN HOESEN'S RULING. NO LIGHT THROWN ON THE SUBJECT. BURGLARS ATTEMPT TO ROB A BANK. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe