Research paper topics, free example research papers

You are welcome to search thousands of free research papers and essays. Search for your research paper topic now!

Research paper example essay prompt: Abortion - 1190 words

NOTE: The samle research paper or essay prompt you see on this page is a free essay, available to anyone. You can use any paper as a sample on how to write research paper, essay prompts or as a source of information. We strongly discourage you to directly copy/paste any essay and turn it in for credit. If your school uses any plagiarism detecting software, you might be caught and accused of plagiarism. If you need a custom essay or research paper, written from scratch exclusively for you, please use our paid research paper writing service!

.. he best conditions possible. Copyright 1975
by Seth Mydans. All rights reserved.
http://www.theatantic/politics/abortion/myda.htm
May 11th, 2000 At the same time, there begins to
appear on the part of some an alarming readiness
to subordinate rights of freedom of choice in the
area of human reproduction to governmental
coercion. Notwithstanding all this, we continue to
maintain strict antiabortion laws on the books of
at least four fifths of our states, denying
freedom of choice to women and physicians and
compelling the unwilling to bear the unwanted.
Since, however, abortions are still so difficult
to obtain, we force the birth of millions more
unwanted children every year.

to cut down on
population growth we should make abortion easy and
safe while we continue to develop other and more
satisfactory methods of family limitation. There
is no perfect contraceptive. The U.S. Food and
Drug Administration reports that the intrauterine
devices, one of the most effective contraceptives
available today, have a failure rate of 1.5 to 3%.
This means that if all married women in the United
States could and did use these contraceptives,
there would still be about 350,000 to 700,000
unwanted pregnancies a year among married women
alone. Even sterilization is not a 100% effective
method of contraception; some operations fail.
Therefore, in order to insure a complete and
thorough birth control program, abortion must be
made available as a legal right to all women who
request it.

The situation is today reversed;
abortion under modern hospital conditions is safer
than childbirth. Though the population experts
have not yet aligned themselves on the side of
abortion-law reform, something is beginning to
happen. Seven states--Arkansas, California,
Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, New Mexico, and North
Carolina--have amended their laws to permit
abortion not only to save life but also to protect
the health, mental and physical, of the mother, in
cases of rape and incest, and to avert the birth
of defective offspring The 8000 to 10,000
in-hospital abortions contrast, of course, with
the estimated one million performed outside
hospitals annually. Probably not much more than
one half of these are performed by doctors; the
rest by the kindly neighbor, the close friend, or
the woman herself. Generally speaking, the laws do
not distinguish in their prohibitions of abortions
between doctors and nondoctors.

Moreover, the
out-of-hospital abortions performed by doctors are
obtained by the same group which accounts for the
bulk of the in-hospital abortions: the middle- and
upper-income white woman who can afford the
hundreds or thousands charged for expert medical
service outside the law. And these are the same
women who can afford to go to Japan, Sweden,
England, or one of the Iron Curtain countries
where abortions are legal and where they typically
cost something between $10 and $25. But most of
the old laws on abortion remain unchanged on the
statute books. In a few states, like Connecticut
or Missouri, the law says that the abortion may be
performed to save the life of the child as well as
that of the mother, although no one is sure what
this means. As a matter of fact, no one knows what
the laws which permit abortion to save the life of
the mother mean.

In order that a physician may
best serve his patients he is expected to exalt
the standards of his profession and to extend its
sphere of usefulness. Copyright 1969 by Harriet
Pilpel. All rights reserved.
http://www.theatantic/politics/abortion/pilp.htm
Published FridayMarch 31, 2000 White House Seeks
to Join Carhart Case Washington (AP) - The Clinton
administration is asking the Supreme Court to let
it join a Nebraska doctor's fight against a state
abortion law. Justice Department lawyers asked the
nation's highest court this week to let them
participate when the Nebraska case is argued
before the justices the week of April 24. They
said the law violates some women's constitutional
right to end their pregnancies.

The court's
decision in the case may determine the fate of 30
states' bans on the late-term procedure opponents
call partial-birth abortion and which is known
medically as intact dilation and extraction.
President Clinton twice has vetoed a federal ban
enacted by Congress. The court has not yet said
whether it will let the administration participate
in the argument, but in a friend-of-the-court
brief made public Thursday government lawyers
called the Nebraska law unconstitutional for three
reasons. The brief says the law challenged by
Bellevue doctor LeRoy Carhart is written so
broadly that it could be enforced against more
than one abortion procedure and is too vague to
let doctors know just what abortion techniques are
outlawed. Even if the law is limited to a single
procedure, the brief says, it unduly burdens a
woman's right to abortion because it fails to
provide an exception to preserve the pregnant
woman's health. The only exception to Nebraska's
ban is if the outlawed procedure is necessary to
save a woman's life.

The statute therefore
prohibits the . . . method even when a physician
concludes that that method is best suited to
preserve the health of a particular woman, the
brief says. The ban therefore forces at least some
pregnant women to forgo a safer abortion method
for one that would compromise their health.

The
surgical procedure involves partly extracting a
fetus, legs first, then cutting the skull and
draining it to allow full removal from the uterus.
Abortion-rights advocates say the court's decision
could broadly safeguard or dramatically erode
abortion rights, depending on what state
legislatures can consider when regulating
abortions. A federal appeals court struck down the
Nebraska law along with Iowa and Arkansas laws.
But nearly identical laws in Illinois and
Wisconsin were up-held by another federal appeals
court. Copyright 2000 Associated Press. All rights
reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
http://www.abortionclinics.org/nebraska.htm Jan.
22, 1998, marked the 25th anniversary of the
landmark decision Roe v.

Wade. The U.S. Supreme
Court ruling, of course, gave women the legal
right to have an abortion. Poll results: 8,885
people voted 1. Should abortion be legal? 77%
yes22% no 1% don't know 2.

Will Roe v. Wade be
overturned in your lifetime? 13% yes 69% no 18%
don't know 3. Have you or has anyone you know had
an abortion? 86% yes 10% no 4% don't know Poll
date: Jan. 18, 1998 Copyright 1995-2000 Women.com
Networks. All rights reserved.
http://www.womanswire.com/backtalk/roewade.html
Abortion Coverage Leaves Women out of the Picture
By Tiffany Devitt For example, the Supreme Court
decision that enabled states to require women
under the age of 18 to get parental consent before
getting an abortion was widely covered.

However,
while more than 1 million teenagers become
pregnant each year, and thousands of them are
affected by state legislation requiring parental
consent, reporters almost never sought their
reaction, covering the legal change without
consulting anyone in the group that it impacts.
This graphic depicts the abortion debate as two
hands tugging at a rag doll-- suggesting that the
debate is about an unborn child rather than about
women's rights
http://www.fair.org/extra/best-of-extra/abortion-c
overage.html Bibliography
http://www.womanswire.com/backtalk/roewade.html
http://www.abortionclinics.org/nebraska.htm
http://www.womanswire.com/backtalk/roewade.html
http://www.fair.org/extra/best-of-extra/abortion-c
overage.html.