"No one may threaten or commit violence ('aggress') against another man's person or property. Violence may be employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only defensively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no violence may be employed against a nonaggressor. Here is the fundamental rule from which can be deduced the entire corpus of libertarian theory."

If that ain't consistent, I don't know what is.

Absolutely ridiculous. There is a large enough percentage of humans who will gravitate towards those who seem to be gathering power.

Tell me, in your "fantasy-world", why do you think that everyone will abide by that law?

"No one may threaten or commit violence ('aggress') against another man's person or property. Violence may be employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only defensively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no violence may be employed against a nonaggressor. Here is the fundamental rule from which can be deduced the entire corpus of libertarian theory."

If that ain't consistent, I don't know what is.

Absolutely ridiculous. There is a large enough percentage of humans who will gravitate towards those who seem to be gathering power.

Tell me, in your "fantasy-world", why do you think that everyone will abide by that law?

Because those that do not will:a) pay restitution to those who they have harmed (Financial incentive)b) be ostracized (social, and to a lesser extent, financial incentive) orc) be killed in the commission of an aggressive act.

Tell me, in your "fantasy-world", why do you think that everyone will abide by that law?

Because those that do not will:a) pay restitution to those who they have harmed (Financial incentive)b) be ostracized (social, and to a lesser extent, financial incentive) orc) be killed in the commission of an aggressive act.

What makes you think those will be the laws? Communities gather like minded individuals, and perhaps the community you live in will slowly evolve into a pirate enclave, for all you know.

Keep dreaming about your "fantasy-world". You could write a fictional book about your ideal society, and most people would stop reading it halfway through because it does not realistically model human behavior. It would have the feel of a naive writer creating fiction to masquerade as his propaganda for an implausible society.

Keep dreaming about your "fantasy-world". You could write a fictional book about your ideal society, and most people would stop reading it halfway through because it does not realistically model human behavior. It would have the feel of a naive writer creating fiction to masquerade as his propaganda for an implausible society.

Fictional books HAVE been written about such a society, and while they're not exactly best sellers, not small potatoes, either.

In fact, if you'd like, a whole chunk of such fiction has been made into comics, most of which you can read online free-of-cost at http://www.bigheadpress.com/

I highly recommend Escape From Terra. Newbies to libertarian thought should definitely start at the start, but you can jump in at the start of any storyline.

I tried to get a wiki started to do this and get people to adopt and work on it, Some people pointed me to the An-Cap wiki, before, I'm still learning. Some people pointed out what I was getting wrong and I changed some things. Many thought i was trying to be too controlling, but anyone is welcome to change fix it, and no one else has contributed, other than the spam bots that have caused me to lock the main page. Some of the people here on the bitcoin forums suggested we don't need a government of any kind at all and that businesses can take care of all the needs that a government does. So I changed the basics of the idea to a business that handles government types of services, and allows taxes

I never said any such thing. I stated that people would not read your hypothetical book, as a way of demonstrating how your arguments do not adequately capture the way human societies come into being, and evolve. Furthermore, regarding the examples you have given, consider the audience who is reading such material. Hint: look in the mirror.

I never said any such thing. I stated that people would not read your hypothetical book, as a way of demonstrating how your arguments do not adequately capture the way human societies come into being, and evolve. Furthermore, regarding the examples you have given, consider the audience who is reading such material. Hint: look in the mirror.