I think Black Ops 2 going over the top with all the technology, the all the military equipment we are using now will still be in use. All this 4 legged tank rubbish just isn't plausable, 1. it would collapse if some sort of rpg hit it in one of its legs and 2. they are not going to produce an army of mechs within the next 13 years, they will never replace tracks on a tank its faster and alot more stronger than something with robotic legs. I know drones are around today but they will never replace pilots in a jet fighter or a conventional plane, I know drones can pull more G's than a pilot can handle but they will never fully replace pilots because the technology can fail or get hacked into (just like the black ops 2 storyline). I think there should be alot more weapons in BO2 that we use today, maybe put in the F35 jet and the new chinese one the J20 in, and they should replace the crappy C.L.A.W with a normal tank like the M1A2 (or M1A3 because its the future) because its just so unrealistic. MW3 is set in 2016 and theres large amount of modern weapons and remember its only 2025 so its not far off MW3 time era.

I can tell your a hater(or a sheep, as I like to call CoD haters), but I will say that they put a huge amount of research into this game, and everything in it is either in the field now, or is in production and testing. So, in other words, you are an idiot to think its too futuristic.

You have the internet as your source. Treyarch have the number 1 expert who advises governments on this topic for research, and a large number of Black Operative soldiers and commanders who know about this. Watch the documentaries in the Interactive trailer, which was made for people who didn't believe the huge technological advancements coming. Which do you think is more reliable? Also, sorry for calling you an idiot, had some sort of rage moment for some random reason.

You ser. clearly have not seen what a computer was like 10 years ago when i was a child back then a top spec computer had a processor that was about 300MHZ or so and had a hard drive of a few hundred MBs, it called Moore's Law which states that every year a computer will become either twice as powerful, half the size or half the price that means in 13 years computers will roughly be 8192 times more powerfull than they are now, also as stated yes all things so far are in testing and yes tracks on tanks will be replaced since a walking tank has far superior mobility and positioning is the single most important aspect of a tank battle walking tanks can walk over things such as rubble or baracades and fit and turn in tight spaces such as allys that a tracked tank cannot cannot, and yes more and more weapons will be AI controled for 2 reasons 1st if destoryed a human is not killed and 2nd once bought an AI does not need to be payed a wage so is cheaper in the long run.

This is the umpteenth thread with someone scaremongering just because the tech looks too "new", it's a two minute trailer for Gods sake, did it not occur to you that they use trailers to show oof the INNOVATOINS etc, and not to show off the majority of the game?

FYI many if not ALL of the tech in the trailer is in testing or production now, just because the military isn't using it right now doesn't mean they won't use it; the M16 was introduced within only a few years of it being given to G.Is in Vietnam, nothing is set in stone.

Now, onto the "future tech";

The quadrotor is being mass produced as a toy right now, wouldn't take much to redesign it into a military item.

The rifle you see is an XM8; a weapon that was designed back in 2005 i believe, again, wouldn't take much to bring it out of the prototype stage

The pistol is a "Kriss Kard", it may look futuristic but was actually made in 2008, again, not very new.

Even the quad tank has been made to some degree, just not militarised. Here are some pics so you know I'm not joking

I will end by saying that; we the community asked for innovation and change, and Treyarch being Treyach obliged by giving us a setting and equipment that we have never seen before, yet people like you OP get upset because it looks out of your comfort zone, see where I'm going here?

I know that the quad rotor is used as a toy and will probably see some sort of military service very soon, I also know that the XM8 is a real gun same with the KARD. I was mainly bashing the mechs, I never see them entering military service myself to replace tanks. However I think they maybe used as a logical role getting over tough terrain. I just want to see more things that we use today because they will still be used in 20+ years but upgraded, The only thing I saw in the trailer that I recognised was the XM8 and the M249 other than that nothing... Its like someone in the 80's saying that by 2000's we will be using totally different weapons and equipment for the miltary, when we still use much the same things just upgraded.

Rail-Guns are EPIC but i thought they still hadn't overcome the barrels melting to make any use of them, to the OP the AN-94 is in there but in RL that isn't very common due to unit cost and specialised training required.

I think Black Ops 2 going over the top with all the technology, the all the military equipment we are using now will still be in use. All this 4 legged tank rubbish just isn't plausable, 1. it would collapse if some sort of rpg hit it in one of its legs and 2. they are not going to produce an army of mechs within the next 13 years, they will never replace tracks on a tank its faster and alot more stronger than something with robotic legs. I know drones are around today but they will never replace pilots in a jet fighter or a conventional plane, I know drones can pull more G's than a pilot can handle but they will never fully replace pilots because the technology can fail or get hacked into (just like the black ops 2 storyline). I think there should be alot more weapons in BO2 that we use today, maybe put in the F35 jet and the new chinese one the J20 in, and they should replace the crappy C.L.A.W with a normal tank like the M1A2 (or M1A3 because its the future) because its just so unrealistic. MW3 is set in 2016 and theres large amount of modern weapons and remember its only 2025 so its not far off MW3 time era.

EVEN if the technology shown in the footage somehow proved to not be possible by the year 2025, (but I do think it is) it would not diminish the game for me at all. Just as an example, what if the warfare technology shown in the game was off by 75 years? So what!! COD is an arcade shooter. Get over it people.