Forum AdAdvertisement

Originally posted by coughas@Feb 16 2006, 07:22 PM how can the waratahs have no star players in their team?? Am i missing something or should players like Rogers, Sailor, Tuiquiri and Turinui all have stars??

I havent explored the game much but was a bit shocked by this....

Click to expand...

Tuqiri and Rogers should DEFINATELY have stars... Sailor and Turinui are debatable though.

The super 14 teams only have the star players that are in there national teams,

Where as in the NH they have extra stars like spencer(wtf) and dallaglio(wtf)......I could think of so many players in the super 14 that are better than them 2 guys.

Rogers,Tuqiri,Latham,Waugh should all have stars for the Aussie Super 14 teams and theres also plenty of Kiwis that should have stars ...... but instead they give them to guys like Percy,Williams,Henson,Robinson,Lewsey etc. who are average at best.

This is why we need a player editor EA!! ,because the guys that made this game have no clue and there rating system just plain sux...

..for example 2 aussie wingers- Brett Stapleton(never played a real profesional game) has an overall rating of 89 ...and Drew Mitchell(one of the best young wingers in the world) has an overall rating of 78 :wall:

I do think that star players need to be looked at again...and I hope that Lazy_Chestnut can work something into his player editor to allow you to switch the feature on and off. Star players should be used in the context of how important they really are to a team.

I also hope that next year EA get some better scouts...some of the stats are pretty appalling.

I know it's annoying, but it's worht noting that a player can have great stats but not be a star... I think it's meant to show players that can single handedly change a game... OK EA may have got it wrong, but a team of good players is more important than 1 star...

Originally posted by toup@Feb 17 2006, 12:04 AM I know it's annoying, but it's worht noting that a player can have great stats but not be a star... I think it's meant to show players that can single handedly change a game... OK EA may have got it wrong, but a team of good players is more important than 1 star...

Click to expand...

I would usually agree with that but i've played 3 games of a six nations campaign as Ireland, and BOD has already scored 10 tries!!! he breaks the line EVERY time!! Don't get me wrong....i'm loving it now, but i'm guessing that it's going to get old soon enough..

@Feb 17 2006, 12:04 AM I know it's annoying, but it's worht noting that a player can have great stats but not be a star... I think it's meant to show players that can single handedly change a game... OK EA may have got it wrong, but a team of good players is more important than 1 star...

Click to expand...

I would usually agree with that but i've played 3 games of a six nations campaign as Ireland, and BOD has already scored 10 tries!!! he breaks the line EVERY time!! Don't get me wrong....i'm loving it now, but i'm guessing that it's going to get old soon enough.. [/b]

@Feb 17 2006, 12:04 AM I know it's annoying, but it's worht noting that a player can have great stats but not be a star... I think it's meant to show players that can single handedly change a game... OK EA may have got it wrong, but a team of good players is more important than 1 star...

Click to expand...

I would usually agree with that but i've played 3 games of a six nations campaign as Ireland, and BOD has already scored 10 tries!!! he breaks the line EVERY time!! Don't get me wrong....i'm loving it now, but i'm guessing that it's going to get old soon enough..