Authors

Abstract

The Court of Appeals of Maryland held, in two consolidated cases, that circumstantial evidence presented to prove injuries from lead paint exposure was insufficient to survive a motion for summary judgment on the issue of causation.

Recommended Citation

Stegman, Matthew
(2014)
"Recent Development: Hamilton v. Kirson: The Court of Appeals of Maryland Held That Circumstantial Evidence Offered to Satisfy the Causation Element of a Prima Facie Claim of Negligence in Lead Paint Cases Must Demonstrate a Reasonable Probability, Not Mere Possibility, That the Subject Property Was the Cause of the Lead Exposure,"
University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 45
:
No.
1
, Article 8.
Available at:
http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol45/iss1/8

Share

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.