Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd
like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our
other members.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

If you are a member in good standing, then you can navigate to the 2015 Miami Dolphins Media Guide from the navigation bar at the top of the forums. Also, in the sticky section of the main forum, there is a link to vote on your top 50 dolphins players of all time.

1.29% of $103,559,672 spent in the general election and ended in the desired result.
Supported 0 winning candidates ; 0.00% of money went to supporting winning candidates.
Opposed 2 losing candidates; 1.29% of money went to opposing losing candidates.

39.17% of $59,181,983 spent in the general election and ended in the desired result.
Supported 2 winning candidates ; 0.59% of money went to supporting winning candidates.
Opposed 28 losing candidates; 38.58% of money went to opposing losing candidates.

We can't lose sight of the bigger victory, and that was over Citizens United aka unlimited corporate cash in elections. We will not be bought. Money is not free speech and a corporation is not a person. End Citizens United.

Barack Obama's Bundlers
Together, 758 elites are directing at least $180,100,000 for Obama's re-election efforts -- money that has gone into the coffers of his campaign as well as the Democratic National Committee..

63 registered lobbyists have bundled a total of $14,358,416 for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign. Additionally, we've identified another 37 bundlers undisclosed by Romney but identified from various press reports

Republicans need to get organized and get their sides corporate money put directly into a candidate and party coffers so the money will be spent on adds with "I'm x and approve this" campaign adds instead of outside groups they don't have control over. And besides having greater domination and unililateral control over what's being said, apparently get rid of some of the effective negative rhetoric PR associatedwith the Citizens United 'outside' corporate money compared to 'inside' corporate money.