Re: [LMMS-devel] LB302 accent

It's a bit off-topic from this discussion, but the per-note settings would
be quite great for SF2.
To quickly switch to another instrument patch so slightly change the sound
(or in this case accent, [thanks for the link]) would be very nice as it
wouldn't require a clunky automation track for temporary patch or bank
changes within a segment.
This may also be better suited for the LB302 accent now that you describe
it that way. Does MIDI have a channel for patches and banks? Would it be
proper to treat it like an SF2 patch/bank and "hit a few birds" with this
one? (not trying to underestimate the amount of work for the per-note
enhancement of course).
- Tres.Finocchiaro@...
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:19 AM, giakka96@... <giakka96@...>
wrote:
> Mmh, ok I didn't quite understand the point xD
> I just thought that it wouldn't be a trouble to use a note as an
> automation-point (that is the way you change a single value at a certain
> point in time, using an automation track; I imagined that LMMS could
> just read that note the same way it read an automation point)
>
> Ok, let's stick with volume-controlled accent with ON-VolCtrl-OFF: it
> will be visible as a new feature, and you can use it in both ways
> (automation/volume).
>
> Oh, I forgot to sign. Gotta change my e-mail, I think >->
>
> ~DeRobyJ
>
> (as for backward compatibility and copying, I don't see the problem. But
> that's off-topic, as diiz said)
>
>
>
> Il 17/06/2014 12:28, Vesa ha scritto:
> > On 06/17/2014 12:53 PM, giakka96@... wrote:
> >> Let's add another feature:
> >> - Toggle a switch of choice (or put a knob to a value)
> >>
> > Can't do that, because regular knobs and switches don't have per-note
> > values.
> >
> > But an idea that has already been talked about on the mailing list is
> > creating the possibility to add per-note controls in instruments.
> > Instruments plugins would each have to expose these controls
> > specifically, by a specially designed API, and you could then set them
> > in the piano roll the same way as note volume and panning.
> >
> > This could only work for native LMMS instruments though, so no Zyn or
> VST.
> >
> > However, this is a bit off-topic... this "per-note controls" idea is
> > still very much theoretical at this point, and it's not certain
> > if/when/how it gets done.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
> > Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
> > Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
> > Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
> > _______________________________________________
> > LMMS-devel mailing list
> > LMMS-devel@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
> Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
> Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
> Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> LMMS-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>