3. Misrepresenting facts in the first two cases

Do disservice to your overall message.

The reason for person #1 is gun control pushed mandatory min sentencing that prevents the judge from looking at facts of the case before sentencing. (Also note she fled retrieved gun returned shot above ex partner head with kids beside him. Then once on bail for the shooting charge she again assaulted and battered the ex partner and plead guilty to it.

Her case is more about mandatory min. Because she had no SYG case at all and that was just an attempt by her lawyers to avoid the charge. (I don't agree with the 20 year sentence but u can blame the gun controllers for that)

Read online the further details of case 2 and many details are missing from your graphic