Follow Blog via Email

May the Stars Greet You On Your Final Voyage!

One of the greatest influences in my life was the television program, “Star Trek“. I loved that program. I also loved science, and here was this television program with an alien named Mr. Spock from the planet Vulcan. The character was the chief science officer aboard the Star Ship Enterprise. It was Fascinating!

My Star Trek Academy Ring

The program was a huge influence in my life because I loved all the high-tech gadgets they would use on the program. The communicators that later became a reality, the flip phones. The medical scanners, which later became hand held diagnostic tools, such as blood analysis for diabetes, and advanced body scanners like CT or CAT scanners.

The iPad concept came from Star Trek and the computer voice recognition also was a Star Trek idea. Way ahead of its time. The developer of the Star Trek series, Gene Roddenberry was way ahead of his time. He was a genius.

My future career in the electronics industry was inspired by these gadgets. Science was an insatiable appetite for me.

3 Dimensional Chess

I loved all the characters in the original series and in the series that followed: Next Generation, Enterprise, Deep Space 9, Voyager. I even got all the Hallmark spaceships for my Christmas tree! Especially the Shuttle Craft with Spock’s voice wishing a Happy Holidays!

It was sad when Scotty (James Doohan), then Dr.McCoy (DeForest Kelley) died. Their characters were also huge influences in my life. All the characters were in fact. However, Spock had the greatest influence. Although I never got to meet the actor behind the character, I went to many Star Trek conventions and met many of the stars from the Star Trek series. It was always a entertaining experience.

I still watch the original series, and I will spend the money to go see a Star Trek movie in the theaters. I rarely go to the movies anymore. Hollywood has become more HollyWeird and many of the movies are nothing like they were in the past.

When anyone says that Obama is deliberately trying to destroy America, they often forget that he did say he was going to fundamentally change America. Has Obama ever said anything nice about America?

When Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that Obama didn’t love America, people forget that you don’t try to change what you love. Obama promised to transform America, why would you want to transform something that you loved? Obama went around the world apologizing for America. You don’t go around criticizing the country that you love, do you? What if my wife apologized for me? But, I digress…

Love of country, as said by George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and in some cases Bill Clinton, was always about American Exceptionalism. American pride and the uniqueness of the attraction of America. Why is it that America is the only country in the world with a line out the door, and down the street, with immigrants wanting to be apart of this great country?

Actions speak louder than words, and critics that scoff at the idea that Obama doesn’t love America attracts a fire storm of negative reactions. Yet, Obama’s actions seem to refute those that come to Obama’s defense.

Bloggers, myself and others, have been reporting this since 2008. One of my blogging friends is Shelly at “Nebraska Attitude” published a video on YouTube and Facebook called “Dismantling Obama (Part One)“.

Please take some time to watch this powerful video. It shows Obama’s love for America, or lack thereof. It is a powerful video, it is funny, scary, frightening, snarky, and it shows who America’s enemy really is. It’s just under 15 minutes and well worth your time watching.

Flies are attracted to bullshit, and this maggot is the most destructive bullshit artist in American history. This clown doesn’t love America. Obama hates America. Actions Speak Louder Than Words America. Stop Defending This Traitor.

Liberal democrats will claim, “We don’t leave anyone behind!“, but they left a Marine to languish in the Mexican jail for accidentally crossing the border. That’s BullShit! Obama used this traitor to parade him before the lazy lame-stream media as some kind of negotiator of peace. BullShit!

Now, Obama is shipping in more Islamic Muslim Terrorist into America, where they turn around and they are returning back to the Syrian Iraq battlefield to establish an Evil Islamic Caliphate. Then they will return to America and commit acts of terrorism on our shores.

Is Obama a Muslim? You tell me, he certainly isn’t a Christian. Obama sat in the Church of Racism led by his racist preacher, Reverend Wright. For 20 years, Obama sat there in the pews and listened to the hatred spewed from the filthy mouth of a pure hate racist.

Obama was raise and abandoned by his parents. A mother that was a whore, a father that was a pimp, and Obama was raised by communist grandparents that hated America. That’s Obama’s “Brady Bunch” upbringing. His “Happy Days” of drinking, smoking dope, snorting cocaine, and who knows what else this mulatto prick did.

But does Obama love America? If you still believe that bullshit, you’ll believe Islamic Muslim Terrorists are just jobless angry Jihads with no opportunities.

This is a War that Obama created by abandoning Iraq and Egypt, by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, and allowing the murder of an Ambassador and many more Americans. Obama’s actions shows he Hates America.

Net Neutrality is the government’s takeover of the internet. The government says the regulations are needed to make the internet fair. When was the internet unfair? This is nothing more than a power grab by the government to tax and add unnecessary fees and regulations to internet providers, who in turn will pass those costs onto the consumer.

The internet is not a utility, and neither should it be treated like a utility. The liberal progressives and Obama want to regulate the internet like a utility. What it means for anyone using the internet: Higher Costs!

Have you ever looked closely at your phone bill? Have you ever wondered what are all those little charges at the end of your bill?

Access Recovery Charge

Federal Excise Tax

Federal Universal Service Fee

Intrastate Surcharge

Public Service Company Tax

PUC Tax

Subscriber Line Charge

Telecommunications Relay Service

These are just some of the extra fees and taxes that are added to your phone bill. If your phone company is your internet provider, then these are just some of the utility charges tacked onto your monthly billing.

Currently, the internet is open and free. So why does the government think that rules need to be applied? Answer: Control. Once the government starts making rules as to the accessibility to the internet content, then it will be like an electronic curtain that will descend and restrict access to certain sites. It’s a pay to play scheme by the government to extort fairness at a cost. A corporate protection racket that uses government as the muscle.

The government will use the straw-man argument that providers regulate network speeds, but network speeds have been getting faster year after year. Broadband speeds are faster now, than they were 5 years ago. The free market has been encouraging innovation and competition by internet service providers (ISP). Yet, the government makes the argument that network providers are not fair.

That’s where the free market comes into play. There’s not a lack of service providers, and people who are dissatisfied with their ISP can find another provider. What it really is corporations trying to protect their monopoly over their competition. Basically, larger companies trying to block out smaller companies with better ideas.

So why is the document a secret? It’s because the government wants to regulate all websites and apps to force providers into unfair regulatory burdens based on what the government calls “fairness”. If you are app developer, then the FCC will put regulations on your intellectual property. If you run a website for your business, then the FCC will regulate who can access your website based on their regulatory rules.

It essentially means the end of the internet. This has got to stop. What the FCC is doing is the same thing as what China does to its people on the internet. Restricting access to a open and free internet. It is what Obamacare is to healthcare services. It just increases the cost of doing business and destroys development innovation.

Under Title II, regulators will have the power to invalidate many Internet practices that deliver enormous value to consumers. Today, Amazon has a deal with Sprint enabling Kindle’s rapid downloads of e-books, which competing e-book sellers could claim was “unjust.” The WhatsApp messaging system acquired by Facebook lets people text for free, which traditional mobile phone companies might well consider “unreasonable.” Netflix will regret lobbying for Title II if its competitors object to its special deals that enable its smooth delivery of bandwidth-intensive video.

Under Title II, almost all Web operations will be subject to bureaucratic control. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court warned that if the FCC treated the Internet as a telecommunications service, it “would subject to mandatory common carrier regulation all information service providers that use telecommunications as an input to provide information service to the public”—in other words, almost all websites and apps would be subject to regulation.

This means the FCC will be able to decide the “reasonableness” of many websites and services: Regulators could micromanage Google search results on the ground that the company uses “telecommunications” to link to other sites. The FCC could oversee news publishers that link to other news sites or have online advertisements connecting to advertiser websites. Social media such as Facebook and Twitter involve telecommunication services, as do email services from Google and Yahoo .

Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, hurts innovation and protects corporate monopolies. The “Fairness Doctrine” forced AM radio stations to provide equal content on the airways. Content that most people don’t find of any value, but it has to be done out of fairness, and not out of competitiveness. National Public Radio (NPR), a taxpayer funded radio station, wouldn’t survive in an open market today. Even though NPR gets a majority of its funding from taxpayer monies, it still has to perform public fund raising. Begging for more money.

When Ronald Reagan eliminated the Fairness Doctrine regulation, it gave rise to the popular Conservative Talk Radio. This new medium literally saved AM radio stations, which were diminishing to FM radio. The popularity of Conservative Talk Radio has been the envy of leftist liberals. They don’t like Conservative Talk Radio because it doesn’t fit their socialist narrative. It cannot be controlled for equal content. Conservative Talk Radio survives because it provides content consumers want.

If leftist liberals had control of the AM airwaves to force equal content, it would be similar to Michelle Obama’s school lunches, where the government will dictate what information you will be fed. That does not feed Free Thinking with nutritional content.

Competition in the free markets created companies like Apple, Google and Twitter. These technologies would have never existed using the 1934 regulations. This innovation will now be regulated by a technology inept government that will be subjected by corporate lobbyists to monopolize their markets. Companies will either survive, or die, based on what the consumer finds of value. The government regulations will stifle innovations and new technologies that consumers will find of value will be prohibited from growing.

There would be no Apple today if these regulations were in place. What the government is doing is going back to the days when AT&T controlled the phone lines and restricted who could plug into their network. Innovation would revert back to a black corded phones hanging on the wall with a rotary dial. Because the government will consider this technology protected, and it would be protected by lobbyist buying off politicians to protect their monopoly.

This has Obama and the democrats written all around this. This government intrusion is neither needed nor wanted.

Obama, is like many extremist liberals that tend to rewrite history and distort the truth. It’s the Alinsky rules of radicalism. Even the news anchor at NBC that lied about his involvement in Iraq, Brian Williams, people will accept what they are told without question, and a lie can last for decades, even centuries.

Obama tried to link today’s islamic terror, to 7th century Christian actions to protect against muslim aggression. Obama tried to link “Democrat” Jim Crow and slavery to Christianity, when muslims are enslaving children, and women today. All lies and distortions of history. A favorite tactic by liberal extremists.

Obama speaks of the past atrocities, but none of the present day butchering of innocents by islamic terrorists. Obama cannot bring himself to call it, “islamic“.

Like this:

Here it comes around again, only now the global warming hoax is repackaged and rebranded now as “Climate Crisis“. Isn’t it something that the so-called climate experts couldn’t accurately predict Snowpocalypse of 2015! What makes anyone believe they can predict the temperature of the planet 10, 20 or 30 years from today, if they cannot predict the weather 24 hours from now?

We keep getting told, year after year, that this is the year the planet was at the hottest in recorded history. Much like a broken record that keeps skipping and repeating the same track, the media picks up on this non-news event and runs like chicken little to proclaim the science is finally settled.

Follow The Money

Among those seizing on the news to make a political point was President Obama, who used his State of the Union address to voice disdain for those who don’t share his view. “I’ve heard some folks try to dodge the evidence by saying they’re not scientists,” he scoffed. “Well, I’m not a scientist, either. But. . . I know a lot of really good scientists at NASA, and NOAA, and at our major universities.”

Obama is a pathological liar, and his assertion that climate science is settled, is like his claim that he’s a Constitutional scholar. It’s absurd! The money spent by his regime for windmills, solar panels and expensive, unreliable and unproven green energy, is off the charts of waste to the environment and the economy. However, if you dangle a government study, baited with taxpayer monies in front of government paid scientists, then they will tell you anything you want to hear, as long as they are being paid. That’s science is settled.

It’s called the science of greed. That’s where man-made, or ‘Anthropogenic climate change’ comes from.

Yet, the media will take a climate study and either distort the findings, or sensationalized the result to something other than the study’s content. Take the following context: “Volcanos causes Global Warming” or “Global Warming causes Volcanoes”.

Time Magazine did exactly that, and made the claim that global warming causes an increase in volcanic activity. Is there nothing that man cannot do? If mans activity on the planet is changing the environment, then shouldn’t we also be able to change the weather patterns, stop tornadoes and prevent hurricanes? Instead of predicting the weather, we should be able to produce the weather we wish. I should be able to go to my computer and order up a sunny day, rain for my lawn, snow for early morning skiing, and a tropical evening for dinner. Maybe Google will invent a weather mood ring? One can only dream.