Re: Michael Salla - Miller

From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:13:47 +0100 (BST)
Fwd Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 15:02:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Michael Salla - Miller
>From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys.nul>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>>Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:18:39 -0300>Subject: Re: Michael Salla>>From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul>>>To: ufoupdates.nul>>Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:03:57 +0100 (BST)>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla>>>From: Michael Salla <exopolitics.nul>>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>>>>Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 04:33:15 -1000>>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla>>>>From: Mike Jamieson <mike.jamieson.nul>>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul>>>>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:16:14 -0700>>>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla><snip>>>Michael et al,>>I'm staggered that this point has taken so long to come up in>>this debate, particularly when you consider that Dr. Salla's>>principle protaganist is a detective. C'mon Josh, you're not>>going to tell me that even at an intuitive level, you don't>>rely on "a gut feeling" based on signals picked up even sub>>concsiously. You won't base a case on it but it might swing>>whether someone remains for further questioning or is shown>>the door instead.>>Far more more affective and reliable than a lie detector>>test, while some body actions can be controlled when lying,>>others, and in particular the eyes, cannot.>>Any decent poker player here on this list will confirm this.>>We had enormous fun during the recent British general>>election, watching Peter Collett's analysis of what our>>politicians were_really_saying as he stripped them down to>>the bare bones.>>There is no question that when applied by an expert, it is a>>reliable method of deducing whether someone is telling the>>truth and should not be under valued or ignored.>I trust you are pulling our legs. I understand Ted Bundy was>well liked by lots of people. He was a serial killer. The>world is full of conmen who lie convincingly to their>victims. Why not just get rid of judges and juries and let>script writers tell us who is telling the truth? Michael Wolf>spent time in a mental hospital and might be considered a>pathological liar.
Yeah, all right then Stan, I'm joking. But these guys aren't.
http://www.channel4.com/culture/microsites/B/bodytalk/lying.htmlhttp://hbswk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=3123&t=globalization&noseek=one
Some other points;
1. Could we stop talking about Dr. Salla as if he is some object
or thing?
2. Give Ted Bundy a rest. His name appears far too often for my
comfort in your messages Stan, and folk are beginning to talk.
3. Someone must be listening to you because, by a remarkable
coincidence, our government has plans in this parliamentary
session to follow part of your advice and do away with juries in
certain cases. And this, remember, is the home of jurisprudence.
Stuart Miller