Arizona:4.1% decline (17,000 votes) in Maricopa County voter turnout (50.2%) from 2008. Turnout in the other 14 AZ counties increased by 8.3%. This is a) a statistical fluke, b) of no consequence, c) indicates massive fraud.

Wisconsin final exit poll: vote shares are not available for 124 (7%) minority respondents. This is because a) they did not respond to the exit poll, b) their responses were insignificant, c) there is no logical explanation

Wisconsin: Sanders had 51% of blacks in the final pre-election poll. But he had only 31% in the adjusted exit poll. Which of the following is false? The difference is a) plausible, b) unlikely, c) necessary to force a match to the recorded vote.

Wisconsin: Sanders had 68% of whites at the 4pm exit poll timeline, but just 59% in the final exit poll. Which of the following is false? The difference is a) plausible, b) unlikely, c) necessary to forced a match to the recorded vote.

Adjusted exit polls: unadjusted polls are always forced to match the recorded vote. This is a) standard operating procedure, b) unscientific, c) assumes zero fraud, d) all of the above.

Wyoming caucus: Bernie won by 56-44% yet Hillary picked up 11 delegates to Bernie’s 7. This is a) no big deal, b) the way the system works, c) proof of a rigged election.

Recorded shares: Sanders has a) 45.3%, b) 47.4%, c) 48.4%

Gallup-weighted shares: Sanders has a) 50.3%, b) 51.9%, c) 53.6%

New York: Hillary won by 57.9-42.1%. She won the exit poll by 52-48%. The probability that the 11.8% discrepancy was due to chance is: a) 1 in 97,000, b) 1 in 126,000, c) 1 in 242,000

Probability that Sanders exit poll discrepancy from the recorded vote would exceed the margin of error in 11 of 26 primaries is a ) 1 in 18 billion, b) 1 in 47 billion, c) 1 in 77 billion

Election fraud: Sanders did better than his recorded vote because a) voter rolls were manipulated, b) 11 exit polls exceeded the margin of error, c) the number polling locations were reduced , d) all

California: Sanders’ highest vote share in 58 counties was in Humboldt county (71%). This was likely due to the fact that a) it is very liberal, b) the only county in the U.S. which uses an Open Source system to audit the votes, c) it was just a coincidence.

California: Clinton led in votes counted on Election Day by 56.4-43.6% . Sanders led after Election Day with a) 47.8%, b) 51.7%, c) 52.7%.

New York: Clinton won by 57.1-47.9%. The 2 Party-ID exit poll split was 83% Democrats and 14% Independents. Sanders had 72% of Independents and 38% of Democrats. Based on the Gallup survey, the estimated split is 53% Independents and 47% Democrats. Using the Gallup split, Sanders had a) 51%, b) 52%, c) 53%

Red states (11): Clinton had 70%. The split was 59% Independents and 41% Democrats. If Sanders had 55% of Independents, Clinton needed 106% of Democrats to match the recorded vote. It is a) implausible, b) impossible, c) an incorrect calculation.

Nevada caucus: Clinton won by 52.7-47.3%. The exit poll split was 81% Democrats and 18% Independents. Sanders had 76% of Independents and 41% of Democrats. But according to the Gallup 2-party survey, an estimated 58% were Independents and 42% Democrats. Applying the Gallup split with the same vote shares, Sanders won by 61-39%. Clinton needed 93% of Democrats to match the recorded vote.
That is a) implausible, b) impossible, c) an incorrect calculation

The pollsters need to ask just ONE question: Who did you vote for?
You need one or more analysts to determine the polling locations and create the questionnare.
Figure two pollsters per location.
And another to tabulate the results.