Like this:

Related

Interesting question, Tate. I was always a big fan of Russell and I loved his gunslinger attitude and ability to make plays for others. While I was disappointed in the trade and have been very disappointed in Lopez, I do like two picks we ended up getting as I think both Hart and Bryant are going to be important pieces for the Lakers.

Bottom line, I would pass at this point in time simply because I would prefer a two-way player like KCP or Bradley who is a true shooting guard than a second point guard like Russell. While I never thought D’Angelo was a negative in the locker room, I don’t think bringing him back would make sense at this point in time. I also think the addition of Kuzma gives us the go-to scorer that I had envisioned Russell becoming.

Finally, I’m not 100% sure I want to trade Clarkson at this point in time. I’ve been impressed with how he has kept his game and composure up during trying times and love how he attacks the basket. I think he is a perfect 6th man who can back up the 1 or 2. He may still have some room to grow and become a better decision maker and playmaker, which would elevate his game. Frankly, I like him better as a 6th man than I do Lou Williams.

One other factor is Russell is in the same situation as Randle and would be expecting a big contract and would screw up our cap space situation just like keeping Randle would. Can’t have two guys in that situation unless you want to use some of our two max contract cap space to sign him. More reasons to pass for now.

Thanks for your reply, Tom. I probably wouldn’t make the trade, but it would merit some consideration. There was a considerable consensus that DLo was actually a 2 guard and not a point. Yet, he did have obvious playmaking/passing skills and could get his own shot. He was serviceable from deep and could be just as effective a backup pg and is 4 yrs younger.