Indeed,
taking an un-jaundiced look at NATO's self-ascribed imperatives makes
the Atlantic alliance only appear as a proxy-service hegemon for the
primacy of the entire industrialized Global North upon the
resource-rich but impoverished Global South. Here is the 24 Apr. 1999
NATO report cited by Edward S. Herman in his imperial Pitbull
article: “The
Alliance's Strategic Concept”9.I also came across this December 31, 2007 proposal from NATO
officials (by simply typing “NATO” with some qualifying
filters into an internet search engine) on how to continue spreading
Western primacy objectives (properly syntactically sugared of
course): “Towards
a Grand Strategy for an Uncertain World”10,subtitled: 'Renewing Transatlantic Partnership'. The following
two penetrating analyses by Ben Hayes, of April 21, 2006 on 'The EU's
Security Research Programme' titled:
“Arming
Big Brother”11
; and the most recent one dated September 2009 with the
Transnational
Institute12
on the 'EU Security-Industrial Complex' ingeniously
titled: “NeoConOpticon”13,
show how the West is Machiavellianly conniving for its own primacy
disguised as “preemptive” self-defense in an “uncertain
world”. Project Humanbeingsfirst has shown, both in this book
and in its many other reports, who is primarily responsible for
making it an “uncertain world” and for what purpose.
Succinctly put, but only in the choicest
political science diction of David Ben Gurion, “what is
inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times.”

Therefore,
daring to call a spade a spade, to omit such blatant doctrines of
imperial predatory planning in one's
purported “analysis” of nuclear security as a domain
expert, and at a prestigious IVY no less, is to in fact be explicitly
allied with the global aims and aspirations of the monumentally
criminal hectoring hegemons themselves. The commonality in Zia Mian's
implicit axioms14.0 with another 'whiteman' domain expert's is revealing:
“Letter
to Matthew Bunn of Harvard on his risk assessment of Nuclear
Terrorism”14.
The make-belief pretenses as a leftist and a peacenik aside, it is
merely “manufacturing
consent and dissent”15
to influence public opinion and fabricate justifications
for empire's own axioms in its egregious pursuit of “Full
Spectrum Dominance”15.1 in a Game
as Old as Empire16.
The import of crafty omissions for manufacturing sophisticated
propaganda cannot be minimized, as was also commonsensically pointed
out by the well known essayist Aldous Huxley:

“Great
is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is
silence about truth. By simply not mentioning certain subjects...
totalitarian propagandists have influenced opinion much more
effectively than they could have by the most eloquent denunciations.”

Let
no one mistake it – the Pakistani physicist turned nuclear
disarmament specialist, Dr. Zia Mian's article is prima facie
evidence that he is merely a paid propagandist (through the
academic-respectability cover) for the same imperial forces that are
today arrayed against his own native nation. One might understand the
'whiteman' carrying his or her own burden. One is however hard
pressed to fathom a 'Negro' willingly doing it for them, the eloquent
wisdom of Martin Luther King quoted elsewhere in this book
notwithstanding.

Since
there is surely going to be no Nuremberg17,18
(as the hectoring hegemons must perceive), nor any moralist's report
from Jerusalem19,
no Justice Robert
H. Jackson20,
and not even a victors'
justice21,
the fate awaiting the 'untermenschen'
gives me the shakes! There is absolutely no apparent deterrence today
for finally annihilating all the
“undesirables” and other
“useless eaters” from the planet as a world government at
the barrel of a global police state is rapidly orchestrated by the
hectoring hegemons and their vassals. Is there really a god(?), one
must surely ponder at these existential moments. While the atheists
might not think so, the
victims, all victims, must believe so22.
There surely must be one! And there surely must also be a Judgment
Day too! For otherwise, where and how are hectoring hegemons ever to
be paid back an eye for an eye, and their victims fairly
recompensed? Dialectical hegemons like Zia Mian would only snicker at
the sheep dreaming of its revenge as the Hegelian23
butcher approacheth!

[21]
Mainly, the atrocious crimes committed by
the Nazis/Axis-powers and not
committed by the Allies were defined as War Crimes. Such as the
HolocaustTM, and first aggression by invading Poland,
Pearl Harbor, etc. In fact, the prosecuting powers defined the
first-aggression to be a crime so heinous
that Justice Robert H. Jackson called it “the
supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in
that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”.
In consequence of such artful definitions of war crimes, attrocious
crimes committed only by the Allies, like
burning down civilian cities of Dresden, Tokyo with sustained
apocalyptic fire bombings night after night (David Irving, Apocalypse
1945: The Destruction of Dresden, http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/ ), and
dropping of the A-Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki upon largely
civilian population centers, were not defined as war crimes, either
at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, or at the Tokyo
Trials.

In
the case of similar crimes committed by both sides, the criminal
cases against the Nazis/Axis-powers was argued to be weak, and
ultimately not prosecuted. See for instance the well known case of
Admiral Karl Dönitz in David Irving, pg. 156, Nuremberg, Ibid.

The
most shocking aspect of victors' justice however, is the relatively
lesser known case of the Nazi banker, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, the
singular financial genius behind the Third Reich – Reich
minister of economics until 1937, Reichsbank president until 1939 –
with deep connections to Wall Street (Antony
C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler,
http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/ ),
and to the Bank of England (David Irving, Nuremberg,
Ibid.), and without whom the Nazi war machine simply could not
have been financed, and therefore, no World War II waged. Hjalmar
Schacht was actually set-free, just as he had boasted throughout the
trial that he would be (David Irving, Nuremberg, Ibid. Also Zahir
Ebrahim, “Monetary Reform: Who will bell the cat?”).

Sadly,
as hypocritical, and as Edward Bernays' style shrewd public relations
campaign that these war crimes trials were, even that level of
victors' justice is not a
deterrence for aggression today, nor available to the
victims of World War IV. See Justice Robert H. Jackson's lofty
closing statements at Nuremberg, ibid., for the clear criminality it
established for today's war mongers, their vassals, state executers,
philosophers, political scientists, shills, and other vulgar
propagandists. Today, they all spin absurdities upon absurdities of
'war on terror' while committing the most egregious crimes against
humanity with impunity! Who will stop them? Never mind stop, people
aren't willing to even speak the truth, or even hear it when it's
plainly spoken. The “banality of evil”
has transcended Hannah Arendt's attribution of it exclusively to the
'Good Germans', to all the 'Good peoples' of the world! One
is arguably more sickend by their pious apathy 'looking from the
side', than by the hired mercenaries, paid assassins, and
ideological circus clowns of empire who do their misanthropic wont
mainly because good people let them.

Search

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.