The new bonds ....By William Finnerty"And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are
more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending
money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but
swindling futurity on a large scale."

Thomas Jefferson, Third President
of the Republic of the United States of America.

Does our Government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial) have the
right to saddle future generations not yet even conceived, let alone
born, with "bangster agreements" of the above kind: especially when we,
as an internationally recognised sovereign independent nation-state,
could be providing ourselves with our own debt-free and interest-free
money?

The way our Government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial) appears to
me to be interpreting Article 6.1 of our Constitution is roughly as
follows:

"All powers of government, legislative, executive and judicial,
derive, under God, from the banksters, whose right it is to designate
the rulers of the State from behind the scenes at Bilderberg gatherings
(and similar highly secretive gatherings all over the place) and to then
promote them with much help from the main-stream-media corporations
owned by the banksters, and, in final appeal, with much 'black is white
because we say so' fraudulent interpretation of the law from arrogant,
know-it-all, and corruption-ridden lawyers, also owned by the banksters,
to decide all questions of national policy, according to the
requirements of the banksters good, and the good of all in governments
who support the banksters."

The actual text of Article 6.1 of Bunreacht na hEireann,
the Constitution of the Republic of Ireland, and as such the
SUPREME LAW of the Republic of Ireland, reads as follows:

"All powers of government, legislative, executive and judicial,
derive, under God, from the people, whose right it is to designate the
rulers of the State and, in final appeal, to decide all questions of
national policy, according to the requirements of the common good."

"The system of banking we have both equally and ever
reprobated ("to see as having been rejected by God and without
hope of salvation").
I contemplate it as a blot left in all our constitutions, which, if not
covered, will end in their destruction, which is already hit by the
gamblers in corruption, and is sweeping away in its progress the
fortunes and morals of our citizens. Funding I consider as limited,
rightfully, to a redemption of the debt within the lives of a majority
of the generation contracting it; every generation coming equally, by
the laws of the Creator of the world, to the free possession of the
earth he made for their subsistence, unencumbered by their predecessors,
who, like them, were but tenants for life…
And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more
dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money
to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is butswindling
futurityon a large scale."

"Notable legal experts and scholars from
both the left and the right, to include former Democrat US
Attorney General
Ramsey Clark, former
Republican Deputy US Attorney General
Bruce Fein, and
Professor of Law
Francis Boyle, have
publicly offered their services to assist in carrying out
impeachment proceedings against President Obama over his
unconstitutional and otherwise illegal war on Libya to any
member of Congress willing to step forward and introduce
Articles of Impeachment."

"Bruce Fein's articles of
impeachment discuss the
run-up to the Libya conflict and conclude:"

"President Barack Obama,
in
flagrant violation of his constitutional oath to
execute his office as President of the United States and
preserve and protect the United States Constitution, has usurped
the exclusive authority of Congress to authorize the initiation
of war, in that on March 19, 2011 President Obama initiated an
offensive military attack against the Republic of Libya without
congressional authorization. In so doing, President Obama has
arrested the rule of law, and saluted a vandalizing of the
Constitution that will occasion ruination of the Republic, the
crippling of individual liberty, and a Leviathan government
unless the President is impeached by the House of
Representatives and removed from office by the Senate."

By
Bruce Fein (Lawyer in the USA
who specializes in constitutional and international law).

"At the
establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies were
supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the
government. Experience,
however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most
dangerous;
that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal
gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their
decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass
silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions
nevertheless become law by precedent, sapping by little and
little the foundations of the Constitution and working its
change by construction before any one has perceived that that
invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in
consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted
for life if secured against all liability to account."
--
Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray,
1823. ME 15:486

Just a few months
after the above mentioned Indymedia publication (i.e. on July
4th 2007), the large, priceless, and irreplaceable ancient
heritage site shown at the www address just below -- part of the
Hill of Taracomplex, which is widely regarded as one of the most important
ancient heritage complexes in the world, and the home of
Brehon Law -- was "lawfully"
(supposedly) destroyed by bulldozers in the circumstances
related at the following Internet address:

"Most of us are simply
unwilling to break a law, get arrested and face the prospect of
prison time to bring a constitutional challenge. All too
often then, such challenges are the result of people who are in
the business of breaking the law. Something is badly
broken when decent people have to depend (indirectly)
on criminals to protect their rights."

Similarly with
regard to all TDs,
Senators, the
President (who is the primary Guardian of our Constitution), all members of the
Judiciary,
County Councillors,
and all civil servants(for example) in the
Republic of Ireland.

"No legislative act, therefore,
contrary to the Constitution, can be valid."

"Every act of a delegated
authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is
exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the
Constitution, can be valid. To
deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his
principal; that the servant is above his master; that the
representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves;
that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers
do not authorize, but what they forbid."

The Tri-Partite
Separation of Powers of Government
(Executive, Legislative, and Judicial)

The Constitutions of the
Republic of Ireland and the
United States of America are believed to have
both been very firmly founded and built on
the doctrine of the "tripartite division of powers of
government" between the three main branches of
government: Executive, Judicial,
and Legislative.

Why is it that
this core-issue doctrine, which was
designed primarily to protect against the well known and all too
frequent social horrors associated with government
bullying and
tyranny -- despotism (in other
words) of the kind (for example) the "ruling elites" of Nazi
Germany arrogantly and brutally indulged
themselves in to "lawfully" (supposedly) murder and otherwise
abuse tens of millions of their own and other people, just a
mere 2-3 generations ago -- and where the origins of the social
protection in question (widely believed by well-informed people
since around 500 BC at least, to be essential for the safety of
humanity generally) can easily be traced back to the "golden"
days of
Ancient Greece, now appears to have been
completely abandoned (for all practical purposes) by the
Government of the Republic of Ireland, and by the Government of
the United States of America as well?

"Abuse of
power by one (of the three main branches of government)
can be checked by the others and tyranny, hopefully, is
prevented."(From "Principles of
Irish Law" by Dublin Law Lecturer
Brian
Doolan.)

"Without debate, without
criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed -
and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian
law-maker
Solon decreed it a crime for any
citizen to shrink from controversy."