The House Judiciary Committee has issued subpoenas for former FBI director James B. Comey and former attorney general Loretta E. Lynch to appear for closed-door interviews in a probe of how federal law enforcement officials handled investigations of Hillary Clinton’s emails and the Trump campaign’s alleged Russia ties.

The orders direct Comey to appear on Dec. 3, while Lynch is to appear on Dec. 4, to speak with members of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees. Both have spoken with other congressional panels looking into matters related to Russian interference in the 2016 election and have indicated they are willing to speak to the joint inquiry as well.

But Comey has already objected to the format of the interview, and on Thursday, his lawyer promised he would challenge the subpoena in court.

“While the authority for Congressional subpoenas is broad, it does not cover the right to misuse closed hearings as a political stunt to promote political as opposed to legislative agendas,” Comey’s lawyer Daniel Richman said in a statement. “The subpoena issued yesterday represents an abuse of process, a divergence from House rules and its presumption of transparency. Accordingly, Mr. Comey will resist in Court this abuse of process.”

Earlier Thursday, Comey tweeted his objection to the subpoena.

“I’m still happy to sit in the light and answer all questions. But I will resist a ‘closed door’ thing because I’ve seen enough of their selective leaking and distortion,” he wrote in a Thanksgiving Day tweet, acknowledging he had received the subpoena..."

I want to know if the evidence gathered as a result of the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation was referred from the FBI to DOJ for a prosecutorial decision …. and who at DOJ kicked it back to Comey to take public responsibility for the decision. And specifically if it was Lynch herself.

And no closed door hearings … they should be wide open for the public to see.