Posted!

Join the Conversation

Comments

Welcome to our new and improved comments, which are for subscribers only.
This is a test to see whether we can improve the experience for you.
You do not need a Facebook profile to participate.

You will need to register before adding a comment.
Typed comments will be lost if you are not logged in.

Please be polite.
It's OK to disagree with someone's ideas, but personal attacks, insults, threats, hate speech, advocating violence and other violations can result in a ban.
If you see comments in violation of our community guidelines, please report them.

OPINION

Opinion: Federal priorities left states unprepared for COVID-19

It was always a matter of when — not if — a new viral pandemic would make it to America. We are not immune to global outbreaks, evidenced by previous close calls with SARS, H1N1 and Ebola. Epidemiologists even predicted the outbreak of COVID-19 with eerie accuracy.

Yet our government was unprepared for the novel virus now upending people’s lives and livelihoods in the United States and around the world. Our health agencies had the information and the resources, so they should have been planning for this, but they weren’t. The problem isn’t that they’re underfunded, it’s that they are bloated and mismanaged.

The core purpose of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is to control and prevent the spread of infectious disease. But a close look at how CDC spends its budget reveals it has strayed from this mission of protecting Americans from communicable diseases, turning more toward influencing people’s lifestyle choices.

The core purpose of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is to control and prevent the spread of infectious disease.(Photo: David Goldman, AP)

In 2019 Congress authorized a budget of $7.3 billion for CDC. Roughly $2.5 billion to $3 billion of that was supposed to go toward fighting and treating infectious disease, but most of that was earmarked for existing pathogens — known threats. This includes $1.1 billion for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and other sexually or intravenously transmitted infections, and $800 million for an immunization and respiratory disease project aimed at increasing vaccinations against common infections like measles, HPV and season flu.

What about $855 million for “public health preparedness and response programs”? That appears to be mostly a conduit for transferring federal funds ($611 million in 2019) to state agencies during emergencies like natural disasters.

Just over $600 million was set aside for emerging and zoonotic (animal-caused/related) infectious diseases. Of that, only $185 million went toward the emerging type — like COVID-19 — with the rest going to efforts at controlling known diseases, such as Lyme, prion and chronic fatigue syndrome.

At best, it seems the CDC had a paltry billion or so in its budget that might have been used to prepare for a global outbreak. The far larger sum was dedicated to non-communicable conditions. This includes $1.1 billion for chronic illnesses and behaviors like obesity, diabetes, smoking and oral health.

Indeed, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC and other agencies were busy sounding the alarm about the nonexistent “epidemic” of youth vaping. Collectively, they spent billions on anti-vaping advertisements, biased research and lobbying, wasted countless hours of congressional hearing time and squandering public trust. Had they remained focused on infectious diseases, they might have been prepared to fight real epidemics like the COVID-19.

How can we fix this? What won’t work is simply throwing more money at the CDC without adjusting how it is spent. Unfortunately, our leaders aren’t even talking about that kind of change. At the Democratic presidential debate in South Carolina candidates scorned the Trump administration for cutting CDC’s funding, blaming this for making the COVID-19 outbreak worse. The claim was untrue (CDC’s budget is bigger now than under the previous administration), but it spurred Congress into passing an $8.3 billion emergency funding bill anyway.

CDC's laboratory test kit for the new coronavirus.(Photo: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

Novel as COVID-19 is, there’s nothing new about exploiting a crisis to expand budgets and score political points. Similar claims of inadequate funding were made during the 2014 outbreak of Ebola, for which various health agencies got an additional $5.4 billion. And what do we have to show for it now? Arguably, emergency funding mitigated the outbreak of Ebola, but it should have been followed by a dispassionate assessment of why agencies weren’t ready for that outbreak and what needed to be done to prepare for the next one. That didn’t happen.

The failure is not of any single administration, agency or Congress. The blame rests with all of them. The threat that novel infectious diseases pose, both to individual health and national welfare, was known, but our leaders still didn’t make combating pandemics a top priority. As odd as it may sound, we got lucky.

COVID-19 is bad, but it could have been a deadlier virus. While we all wash our hands, isolate and hope for the best, officials — from the White House and Congress down to state and local governments — must work together to adjust our national health priorities. Agencies need to narrow their focus, stop wasting time and money and start preparing for the next pandemic. If they don’t, we may be far more unlucky next time.

Michelle Minton is a senior fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute. She wrote this for InsideSources.com.