If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Of course, all of this conspiracy that it wasn't those fine, upstanding duped Chechans can't be verifiably proven either. But again, I just know these things. You'll have to trust me.

This latest RT video is kind of more like The Onion than serious. Why would the guvment need to distract the American public to pass laws? Americans are as complacent and unaware as a corrupt guvmnet could hope for. I don't remember any instances of the public rushing Congress over an unpopular law.

Some of the dudes interviewed in this video are from Wisconsin. Who takes anybody from WI seriously?

Why would the guvment try to launch an offensive in Russia's Northern Caucauses? The military has been overextended for the last 12-13 years and hasn't had too much success. The only military victory we have had since WWII was our invasion of Grenada. So we got A-Stan still. We're out of Iraq, but...... We have Iran to worry aboot. We have North Korea to watch............So, hey let's go get the Chechans and those other "STAN" countries. Ok..............Besides Russia don't like us and probably wouldn't be happy to see us in their backyard. Russia will be against us(officially) some day. Russia, China and Middle Eastern countries will launch savagery upon America some day. See, I just know these things.

And Gun Dudes......... The guvment isn't going to take away peoples' guns. Keeping the looney tunes of society from legally purchasing firearms, via background checks, is a FAR cry from the guvment taking away peoples' guns. It would take decades to launch a " Take away their guns" campaign, and it would only cause death, chaos and rebel intaglements. The guvment can't handle it's foreign problems with having a widespread chaotic civil dispute raging within it's borders.....

Everyone who is decent and good...............Move to Canada.......QUICK !!

Why would the gov do this as a distraction?
Well for one, the same day as the bombing Buah, Obama, Clinton, Petreaus, Chenney, Rice and others we indicted by a bipartisan congressional committee on war crimes including the torture and death of young children.
Secondly and most importantly so they could beta test the US public by rolling out the DHS placing an entire city and suburbs under Martial Law. Shelter in place my ass. Wake the f**k up man!!!!

Why would the gov do this as a distraction?
Well for one, the same day as the bombing Buah, Obama, Clinton, Petreaus, Chenney, Rice and others we indicted by a bipartisan congressional committee on war crimes including the torture and death of young children.
Secondly and most importantly so they could beta test the US public by rolling out the DHS placing an entire city and suburbs under Martial Law. Shelter in place my ass. Wake the f**k up man!!!!

They were indicted? You sure aboot that one, dude? So, they are going to be tried for war crimes? Ok, when that trial goes down be sure to let me know. And say if this really happened why would the American public have to be distracted from it? And dude, you may want to watch were you get your info from. Youtube and radical religious sites aren't the most relaible sources of info.....

Yeah, martial law is coming. It had nothing to do with the search for a terror suspect? See, there's a big difference between what happened in Boston and actually imposing martial law. People cooperated with the restrictions. A big difference. Shoot, in places like Philly no one would have payed attention to the in house restriction. Dude, America is run by the almighty dollar. Placing people under martial law isn't going to be good for business.

I was making fun of religious people that blindly follow religion just because athiests cant directly prove there is no god. I would think more of you if you were an athiest, it would prove you bullsh!t detectors are at least functioning

Nahhh, not an atheist. I can understand how people might think I'm making fun of Jesus, but I'm actually not. But I can see how people would take it that way. That's just how I roll. I'm Irish, Catholic and drunk - the way God intended. But I really don't care much aboot the Pope and I find the priest sex abuse kind of amusing. I don't roll with things that man has taken over because man is a dumbarse obsessed with money and power.

So, my intellectual reputation is shot now, huh? Oh well. I can handle myself in any debate with anybody on this site, so it's all good. I read Gordon Korman novels......and John D. Fitzgerald too, so I'm extremely well read. Actually Oipaul is down with these wordsmiths too, which surprises me because he hates me. Calls me a hippy liberal and stuff, but his literary taste is on the hook.

I was making fun of religious people that blindly follow religion just because athiests cant directly prove there is no god. I would think more of you if you were an athiest, it would prove you bullsh!t detectors are at least functioning

If you had written it with a southern drawl, it woulda been more convincing.