"The fact that I get charged an $875 inspection fee (not to mention the Rental Registry Fee) for an hour long inspection of a 5 unit building that is already the nicest house in the neighborhood is the issue," one rental property owner, Dman, wrote. "Why doesnt the City have an issue with the owner occupied dumps around me? The blight in the City is not my fault...yet I am being forced to pay for it."

Who's in the right on this issue? Are city officials finally taking the right approach to rental properties in Jackson? Or are they being too heavy-handed?