Having read your last letter, we can't help feeling that we
might have been harsh in the previous letters. There are many points here
we agree with.

However, folklore, grammar and conspiracy theories aside, there
are still two fundamental issues of disagreement. First, you in our opinion,
keep miss-identifying concert goers as supporters of Mr. Milosevic. We
seem to have failed to explain that these people are, in our judgment,
first and foremost against bombardment of their country. Montenegrins are
in our opinion good Christians, but won't you agree, it is to much to ask
them, even in the time of Easter, to repent for the sins of Mr. Milosevic
and quietly accept crucifixion. It is evident, that prior to the NATO "humanitarian
action" popularity of Mr. Milosevic has been diminishing. Judging by the
results of the last election, about two third of citizens of
Montenegro did not support Mr. Milosevic and his well placed protégé
(ex-president). Therefore it is not the acts of Mr. Milosevic in
Kosovo or elsewhere, particularly not alleged atrocities, that might
have soared his support, but rather those of NATO.

You are probably right to note that in the history of this region
there was a lot of violence and sometimes barbarism. But there was also
a lot nobility, bravery and dignity among other positive things.
Despite occasional irrationality and spite, the people of the region have
learned to make a clear distinction between right and wrong. Accordingly,
they don't seem to have judged the NATO action to be just regardless of
the misdeeds of Mr. Milosevic.

Second, although one may argue that, on humanitarian ground,
NATO had to intervene to be seen to do something, we disagree about motives
for this inevitability. Given the shocking pictures of Albanian refugees
and the sheer magnitude of that humanitarian disaster, not to mentioned
Serbian refugees, one has to question NATO's concern for Albanians
themselves. There are few who can better reinforce this point than Commanding
General Wesley Clark. He declared that the increase in suffering of Albanian
population in the wake of NATO strikes was "entirely predictable". We have
been privately suspecting for some time, that American contribution, particularly
that of hawkish State Secretary, to the "resolution of the Kosovo
crisis", would make it "inevitable" for NATO to intervene sooner or later.
This, as well as Mr. Milosevic's lack of art of possible, made American
preaches self-fulfilling prophecy.

Finally, let us express our gratitude for your time and efforts
spent trying to clarify an American view of the Balkan war.