This site is a free service for communication, self-expression and freedom of speech. We believe this site increases the availability of information, encourages healthy debate, and makes possible new connections between people.

While reporting on topics, we will ask the questions some newspapers don't. We will print the questions that some newspapers won't.

All sources of information are confidential.

Email The Fact of The Matter at:

tfotmwestfield@gmail.com

Friday, October 28, 2011

Video: Westfield Candidates Debate

Go to the posted web link to watch this years candidates for Westfield Town Council participate in a forum/debate. The video link is provided by the Westfield Leader newspaper.

My thoughts on the candidates after watching the video.Ward 1 Arena comes across as a caring person, knows how to play to the camera and say the right things. Knowledgeable on the issues. Incumbent supportive of current state of affairs in town. VanEpp appears to be intelligent and his background would bee an asset to the council but needs some energy. Talks about "visioning" which throws me off. I like reality.

Ward 2 Neylan has no opponent. The only comment is that she also plays to the camera as an incumbent to make it look like all is well and the Mayor and current council are doing a fine job and there is no need to rock the boat. Comes across as wholesome.

Ward 3 LoGrippo appears to be a little nervous, I'd be also. Reading from a script most of the time. Attacks opponent instead of answering some questions. Does not seem to be "in it to win it." A "team" player" for current council. Sontz is knowledgeable and critical of current government and seeks change. Articulate and prepared but fast talker, maybe because of time. Wants to curb wasteful spending. Kasko appears informed. Answers questions with numbers and examples public understands. Articulate and prepared. Critical of fire staffing levels and wasteful spending.

Ward 4My ward, I will vote. Foerst is knowledgeable and informed. Has served admirably. Talks to the people. Supports current councils stance on all issues; has to, he is an incumbent. Somewhat "full of himself" but that can be confused with being knowledgeable and forceful. Romer appears to be in it for the fun of it. Not that I don't think he would make a good councilman, but he came across as a bit aloof. I think he would bring a clear conscience to the council.