Enhance Your Penis in the Shower

Bathmate is the world's #1 selling pump! It's safer than air pumps and the most comfortable pump on the market! Plus, the Bathmate is so easy to use! Simply use it while you go about your normal bathing routine!

I am having somewhat of a problem with your following assumptions:
1) adding 2 inches to get from flaccid to erect and 2) adding .5 inch to get from NBP to BP

i have watched a lot of videos where guys gain a lot more than 2 inches. 3 to 7 is not that unusual nor is 4 to 8. I personally grow from 2.5 to 5.35. Also, many long flaccids grow less than an inch when erect. I believe the flaccid to erect correlation is one of the more difficult assumptions to make and probably should be avoided.

The Wessels et. al. study at UC San Fransico among older men applying for penile enlargement surgery used 1.25" as the difference between NBP and BP erect length. Accordingly, age factors in a lot into the width of the fat pad so to better understand the study reports, we need to know the age of the participants.

Wow, you're a grower, too, not2big. Were you more of a grower before PE?

Thanks for keeping me honest. I just did some research on typical flaccid to erect growth and typical flaccid to stretched growth. It's something I've looked at before, but never written down. I used one source for now, but I'm going to do some more looking around and see if I can find more.

First, let me cut to the chase, and respond to your 2 points:

1)I'll give the details down below, but for now I'll just say that I stand corrected. The numbers are higher than 2 inches going from flaccid to erect in some studies, but in other studies it is lower. I'm not trying to come up with an exact formula for going from flaccid to erect. That would be crazy, because it does vary quite a bit, but I do think it makes sense to think about an upper bound on the AVERAGE growth. Flaccid length is a poor predictor of erect length for one man. It does vary quite a bit from man to man and from study to study, but the average growth is limited. For example, there are no studies that I've come across so far in which the average growth is greater than 2.38 inches. I've only found a couple so far, but as you'll see down below, there are quite a few good examples if you throw in the studies that measure flaccid and stretched.

2)I agree that age is a big factor in fat pad size. The Italian study I quoted in the OP was done on military men between the ages of 17 - 19. That's why I used 0.5 inches. I guess I could up that a little bit to be conservative. I can't find the details of the Wessells study right now, but I thought the fat pads in that study were 1.1 inches. Maybe someone who has access to the study can confirm it. I may be wrong. Anyway, the important thing is that they were older, on average. Don't quote me on this, but I recall the average(it might have been median) age in that study being somewhere in the forties.

OK, so here's the paper I used for gathering the flaccid to erect and flaccid to stretched data. It was easy, because they had a table with all of the numbers from different studies. I just had to take the differences:

All you gotta do is look at porn stars with their hands over their dicks in a video ... If you're 6'5 you've got bigger hands than them, and when your 8+ BPEL x 5.9 girth huge dick looks about the same you should shut your dumbass disbelief up ... How you've somehow deluded yourself into believing otherwise is just sad ... thinking all the girls are lying to you ... somehow perceiving other guys you see as bigger ... it's honestly just pretty sad ....

ive not read this whole thread so sorry for asking this question as i am sure is explained but what do you mean by strecthed etc etc.

do you mean you gain 2" frm flacid to erect in lengh whats this one mean "My flacid to stretched is 2.75"".

sorry its my fault i have not read this whole thread

Yes, I got the numbers I listed by taking the average stretched length or average erect length, depending on what was measured in the study, and subtracted the average flaccid length from it.

So "flaccid to stretched" means the difference between the mean stretched length and the mean flaccid length in the study. "flaccid to erect" means the difference between the mean erect length and the mean flaccid length in the study. For some studies, they measured both stretched and erect length, so I gave both differences. For one of them, the "flaccid to stretched" was so small that I also included the "stretched to erect" difference, because it seemed unusually large.

ThinJohnny, prior to PE, I was about 2" flaccid and 4.5" erect ((none bone pressed). I am now 2.5" (on average) flaccid and have a stretched flaccid length (NBP) of 5.75". You can add about an inch to the above to obtain my BP measurements.

Stretched length is measured from the base to the tip while pulling your shaft out from your body as hard as you can. It is considered more reliable than measuring erect length because it is not subject to changes in EQ due to extraneous influences. Normally, stretched length is fairly close to your best EQ erection, sometimes a little more or less.