Common Good Dialogue - Alan Page's blogtag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-868432417978181242018-02-02T11:26:38-05:00An on going discussion of our common good and how we are doing at maintaining it.TypePadThe White Hats Report and forestry - A PLANETARY CODE OF CONDUCTtag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01b8d2d6b623970c2018-02-02T11:26:38-05:002018-02-02T11:26:38-05:00http://whitehatsreport.com/ The White Hats Report is a periodic discussion of timely topics from the perspective of an anonomyus forensic financial investigator "Paladin". His latest is #63 and is entitled "#ARRESTtheFED. In view of the recent conviction of Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, I suggest that the title ought to be expanded to...Alan Page

The White Hats Report is a periodic discussion of timely topics from the perspective of an anonomyus forensic financial investigator "Paladin". His latest is #63 and is entitled "#ARRESTtheFED. In view of the recent conviction of Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, I suggest that the title ought to be expanded to include the ideas that arresting is only one step in the process of containing and eliminating crime. So the title might better be: #INDITE,ARREST,TRY,CONVICT,andCONTAINtheFED.

If you look a little further you will find that there are sections of the military who are completely opposed to reduction in war making.

Why mention forestry in the same breath as trading systems that claim to be able to release $25000 trillion to a single individual?

FOREST LAND is an asset that delivers long term terrestrial benefits. However, the functions that are necessary for a forest (particularly in near urban settings) to continue to even exist are continually opposed by those who control the current financial system.

Personal experience with sources of funding and forest owners as well as academic presentations of economic "fact" have convinced me that this is no coincidence.

If one is going to help maintain rural communities anywhere one has to ensure that the outside world can not destabilize those parts of any such community with outside resources that can replace the sources that under-gird the local structure.

John Perkins explains how this function of REPLACEMENT of local capabilities has been honed to a fine art in his book THE CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN. Naomi Klein has described how the ultra wealthy have prepared DISASTER CAPITALISM so that they can replace any part of a local society with outside methods /venues given the appropriate disaster.

FORESTS ARE NOT RESILIENT TO IMPOSED DISASTERS!

We need a global "PLANETARY CODE OF CONDUCT" now!

There should be no entities that are above the CODE except in temporary holding areas and then the activities must be closely constrained.

Responsibility - Being who you want to betag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01b8d2d3b2bd970c2018-01-26T06:41:34-05:002018-02-02T10:56:28-05:00The following is a comment offered on an i-uv.com page: http://i-uv.com/hatj-bills-comment-on-iuv-for-all-feeling-into-the-unbinding-unwinding/ The text below will be followed by more detailed discussions of the ideas contained in this short paragraph in this and future posts. It may be time to think about what "I" (the reader of this note) have to...Alan Page

The text below will be followed by more detailed discussions of the ideas contained in this short paragraph in this and future posts.

It may be time to think about what "I" (the reader of this note) have to do to guarantee that "I" am able to be the "VALUE" to this planet that "I" was chosen to have - "the ultimate value". ,If you have not figured it out yet "i-uv" stands for "I" am the Ultimate Value.

The <i-uv.com> site is built around helping each one come to grips with the fact the we all are creator beings of infinite value and we ALL need to claim that value - or someone else will.

Hi BZ, It may be important for things to flow the way they are but Heather and Randy are where they are because of the continued success of the greed based system at denying people the truth and the inability of the structure that was funded by the 2013 OPPT and the unrebutted UCC filings to be communicated to normal folk. Unfortunately, like most of what I hear about the "growth" of money, be it paper or electronic stock or crypto, there are few examples of folk using the new access to resources (which) that funding allows to put together the local governance that can hold the variety of other folk within the communities that they either struggle within or end up leaving for economic reasons. So we are where we are because the ball got dropped in 2014 through no fault of Heather's, but rather all of us making "normal" choices. In our choices of BEING and Doing that we make from this point forward we need to think of what Heather is going through because we were not on board enough to DO and BE those beings who put the EVIL in its proper place. I pray that Heather gets to go home and be a mom for her family because we and the other forces of good will can and have come together and tell the OPTW that we all are willing to govern ourselves without compromising anyone. This will require our being cable to put psychopaths out of the power structures and call out greed as an inappropriate goal. Good luck! Maybe this is what Ascension is?

***************

First a few definitions:

OPPT is the "One Peoples Public Trust". This trust was formed following investigations into the breakdown of the "Public Trust"

"Public Trust" (PT) according to Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf was an old trust setup by ancient powers to care for the global assets for the good of humanity. The Trustees of PT were the ones who supposedly hired several teams to do the research that has ended up with Heather having to place herself in situations that no normal individual would willingly commit to do in order to prove the levels of corruption that she had found and is still exposing.

OPTW is the old powers that were.

UCC stands for the Universal Commercial Code it is a standard form of communication that sets out who the commerce is dealing with and what the conditions of the dealings are that will be accepted by and between the parties involved. If not corrected the information contained therein governs any future dealings.

"unrebutted" means that the details within a particular UCC filing has not been challenged within the normal contract modification period (or ever).

The following pages are from a Praecipe delivered to the Federal Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville on January 22, 2018 by Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf (HATJ).

A Praecipe is an order to the person or persons, or entities to which it is addressed. This Praecipe was a Declaration, Judgement and Ordering the court to Dismiss the impending (now in progress as of 180126) alleged case against Randall Beane and HATJ

The 5 Details pages are copies of pages in which HATJ makes a declaration of facts about which most people are unaware (these are in Libre Office .odt format - a free Office word processor and other functions).

On 2/1/2018 after a short period of deliberation the jury decided that Heather and Randy were guilty on all counts. There was the statement repeated that they both were going to have to be placed in protective custody to "protect" them.

What is in the Universal backdoor?tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01bb09eb9f3c970d2018-01-23T09:23:07-05:002018-01-23T11:10:15-05:00If you do not even know that a Universal backdoor exists, join the club! It is time that you take some time to view the discussion of a Praecipe delivered on January 22, 2018 to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN TENNESSEE at 11:59 pm. To read the text of...Alan Page

If you do not even know that a Universal backdoor exists, join the club!

If you have not heard of <i-uv.com> it may take longer than the 45+ minutes to watch and listen to this reading of the important parts of this Praecipe to get your head around what is coming down. In fact you could and should spend several days looking for those parts (of what is said there) that have been hidden from us all for many decades even centuries.

As is stated in this reading all of the records of what has happened since the early 1970s can be found on the i-uv site. It may be necessary for a little guidance to find how this all can be followed in a clear and understandable way. A few pointers are offered below:

1) The i-uv site was set up with the understanding that humanity is SPECIAL. I = me and you. U = ultimate. V = value. In a nut shell "you are the ultimate value" and restated for you to read to your self: "I AM the ULTIMATE VALUE".

IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE THAT. AND IT IS TIME FOR EACH OF US TO RECOGNIZE THAT IN EACH ONE AND TO BE IN A WAY THAT ALLOWS THAT FACT TO SHOW THROUGH OUR DEALINGS WITH EACH OTHER.

We all need to come to an understanding of what Executive Order 131818 and the declared National State of Emergency has to do with our lives and the way we go about being and doing. So if you have not used the link above you may do so with this copy:

2) The i-uv site has many links to a tremendous volume of information. Getting at the parts you wish to investigate may be a little challenging so the following details are provided:

a) There is a search block in the upper right corner of each page if the i-uv site. Om the right side of that block is a drop down box with a list of pages on the site. This list is the best access point that I have found.

b) Occasionally there is a functional menu bar that is normally unavailable under the main title bar. Hopefully this can be made more obvious at some point.

More later.

1

True URGENCY - FULL DISCLOSUREtag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01b7c944ef07970b2018-01-13T10:30:57-05:002018-01-18T16:47:38-05:00Many sites have been suggesting that some big changes were coming. Two competent researchers as well as politically connected advocates have also raised the alarm this week: The following are must "reads" as they appear to be based on solid evidence that there are groups trying to actively silence this...Alan Page

Many sites have been suggesting that some big changes were coming.

Two competent researchers as well as politically connected advocates have also raised the alarm this week:

The following are must "reads" as they appear to be based on solid evidence that there are groups trying to actively silence this kind of discussion:

David Wilcock was a replacement guest on Jimmy Church's Fade to Black filling in for Corey Goode who was hospitalized with a 103 degree fever.

(I would like to credit enerchi for these links posted at <ascensionwithearth.com>.)

These posts are not listed in any particular order because they both are worthy of attention and skepticism.

I would highlight the Corey Goode message delivered by David Wilcock because it is clear that there have been very powerful negative forces at play here on Earth for the past century or more that are still trying to retain control of humanity. Corey's hospitalization is an outward sign of this modus operandi. It is true that Dr. Greer mentions Operation Paper Clip and the fact that both he and Dr. Rosin have been treated very badly.

The important message from Corey Goode is that we are now at a time when Dr. Greer's message may be the appropriate one to listen to. It is my opinion that while we must be ready to forgive every action we must be in the position of not forgetting what has gone before.

This position is not taken as one to seek revenge rather to serve as a background to use to detect when something is going the wrong way. Hopefully the job that Corey poses for humanity is to come to pass. It is important to completely comprehend what has gone before!

There has been mention of breakaway societies that use Earth resources as a springboard to leave the planet behind. In both of the above conversations it is hoped that you will recall the discussion about the need for a "Planetary Code of Conduct". It appears that such a document is needed to enable Earth to retain a hospitable environment even as massive change happens. Earth is a special place and should remain so special.

Silviculture - 'Intelligent' use of fundstag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01bb09e7d7eb970d2018-01-12T10:17:18-05:002018-01-12T10:23:50-05:00Be careful of the information you trust. Discernment is the process of following paths to the point where you are satisfied that you innerstand the implications of what is being presented.Alan Page

A Note on the Construction of the Northeast Silviculture Institute Website:

There are several channels of thought that need to be exposed for what they are. Three worthy of mention apply here:

1) Funders

2) Foresters and non-foresters; landowners and non-owners

3) The alternative media and all of humanity

It appears that the earth is in a period of massive change and most of humanity seems to be oblivious of the range of issues as they are entertained or preoccupied with survival. So enjoy this exchange with one side of these interest groups:

Hi Charlie,

I wish you well with the construction of your (our) new site. It is unfortunate that there has not been any meeting of the minds and that there is so much misinformation being promulgated from the halls of learning today.

Silviculture is the application of knowledge and money (energy and equipment) or the lack thereof to forests. There is no good or bad, just what is.

massachusetts has a fraud laced money supply system that does not seem to care how to get things to work - they just want the money spent on time. Two pictures of a hard maple tree that we just cut are included. The performance of that tree, and trees like it, was not able to open a dialog about how the standards for application of thinning and pruning should be modified to get the funding in place to be used when it is needed. The following is a note to the Asst. State Conservationist after they chose to force the closure of a contract for thinning and pruning that could not be done within the time frame and standards now in place. They were willing to dispense the funds, but the owner would have to perjure themselves (certify that the application of the practice now in place met the NRCS standards) to get the funds released.

---------

Message body

Thank you, Tom.

I mentioned that I had a section of hard maple in my truck when I met with you. I brought it along to show that there is much more to the idea that there are things that could / should be influenced by the kind of funding that we are concerned about here.

This maple tree was 34 years old when cut. At 8 years old it was almost unrecognizable as a tree. The log when cut was 18' long 16" in diameter and 28 years old as shown in the first attached photo. Things obviously happened very fast (in forestry terms within this tree) and they are not recognized in any way by the current NRCS standards and the time frames for payment. The point of all of this is that the work that is being terminated will not do the owner any significant good except for the exercise in doing some of it (they are nearly 80 - 34 years from now they may be 114?). Rather this could form the base for community value production that will not happen without funding and the work will not be there for those who wish to participate because of lack of liquidity. The (request for) restructuring of the time frame for the contract does nothing to modify the "standards" instead it stretches out the time of application for some things like what happened in the maple tree to occur.

…., the NRCS field agent, has said that the structure of the payment system used with this contract (a 100meter square grid tied to the UTM coordinates) has been dysfunctional for the NRCS as well. Unfortunately, all of the owners that I get to work with do not have the liquidity to fund the work any other way. If you can not come up with a funding system that can handle large blocks (50-500 acres) in small payment units (2.5 acres) over extended time periods then we need to find another funder - the sooner the better. I am positive that the elite have technologies that are being withheld from the general public that can facilitate these needed maintenance practices. It is time that these technologies are released for demonstration and improvement and that we begin to think about how our youth are going to function once the drugs and mind control are reduced or eliminated. IN FACT I DEMAND THE RELEASE OF THIS INFORMATION TO GROUPS LIKE OURS! along with funding like Lockheed Martin - Skunk Works gets as a matter of right.

These existing energy technologies are suppressed because those ENTITIES with connections have access to markets that will disappear with wide spread application. NRCS and state authorities should hold themselves to a higher standard (by choosing what and how to fund) than the rest of the entertainment industry that is now being exposed for what it really is - a vehicle for mind control. I say this because I am told that the NRCS is not a production facilitator? I need a production facilitator! Rural humans are both sustainable and peaceful if unprovoked, they deserve the same access to funding as the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works. Christine, I look forward to your reply. (Check out the 1993 statements of Ben Rich of LMSW.)

---------------

I am not surprised by the action of the USDA in this regard. However, many things are happening NOW that will change the face of everything that we think of as normal. This link was released last night. I do not know how to introduce it in a way that can help the reader ease into it other than to ask that they listen with an open mind.

If this is correct, and I am willing to wager (not that I am inclined to bet) that it is, we will need to look much more carefully at the ways we treat our forests and our rural communities - as well as each other! Enjoy the ride.

Important Signs of Changetag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01b8d2c89c88970c2017-12-19T07:03:05-05:002017-12-19T07:05:05-05:00The changes that are coming are getting closer and the level of distraction is increasing (these changes should not be surprising, but they may blow your socks off as well). Pay attention to the range of information before choosing a path that may result in burned bridges. If anyone tells...Alan Page

The changes that are coming are getting closer and the level of distraction is increasing (these changes should not be surprising, but they may blow your socks off as well). Pay attention to the range of information before choosing a path that may result in burned bridges.

If anyone tells you they have the whole truth and then reveal something extraordinary, it may be that they are trying to hid more than they are telling you - this may be truer now than ever before. Examples of this come from recent headline news (or the lack thereof in a normal media outlet. The NYTimes release of videos of government encounters with unidentified objects and discussion of black project monies could raise more questions than answers.

A quick review of recent discussions here show a strong focus on rural life and sustainability. There has not been much discussion of religion or politics. However, it is said that most religious teachings include some form of the "golden rule". The INTEL from Goode may draw your focus to the one religion that turns the golden rule on its head - the worship of satan.

For the past century and possibly for much longer, it appears that those who sought the control of all global activity have been able to garner control of currencies and then much of the practice of government and commerce. The warnings of revelations about to come provided by Goode are echoed by many others some have been mentioned here (Ronald Bernard).

Fragments of the plan for world dominance are scattered here in earlier posts, but the essence is that the concentration of people in population centers or places of luxury and entertainment removes them from the basis of their survival and when push comes to shove they will do anything necessary to survive. This is close to where we are today.

If you do not want yourself or your loved ones to become or continue to be a slave to this system you need to choose well. This will only happen if you listen well, and make your desires known to your creator and your allies. It appears that there are unacknowledged allies who need your acceptance in order for them to offer help.

Discernment will be needed to tell who is able to be forgiven. As change progresses it may turn out that these decisions appear to be easier than they are and that you will get to experience the results of the choices you make? Hope for the best!

Opinions, Facts, Information - BEING WRONG: MEA CULPAtag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01bb09d103d2970d2017-10-26T11:02:07-04:002017-10-26T11:02:07-04:00When your opinion is wrong what do you do? The climate is changing, but why is open to debate.Alan Page

When one is confronted with facts or information contrary to ones opinion there are only a few choices - delve more deeply into the source of one's opinion or deny the need for such introspection.

Such an occasion has happened several times recently. This post provides an insight into one of these instances. The following is the text of a modified version of a document that has been posted prominently on Common Good Forestry. The changes came from the realization that there may have been areas of forest information that were either inappropriate or wrong. There are many sources of concern that were pointing in this direction but Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers ably provided the basis to understand that such a modification was needed and appropriate at this time:

Forests In temperate regions naturally regenerate: When land is left undisturbed for a period of 5 to 15 years, regardless of the prior condition it returns to the forest condition given adequate light water and temperature. This is a basic principle of sustainability that will only be altered by change of or damage to the climate maintenance system.

Forests are an integral and consequential part of the terrestrial environment wherever they occur:

Forestsmaybeanimportantcomponentoftheglobalclimatemaintenancesystem – thisdependsonwhere the major influences on climate change are coming from (extra-solar system impacts, solar changes, earth protection system changes, and atmospheric composition changes). Forests can be either or both storage sites for atmospheric CO2 and release sources. Thus healthy forests perform functions needed for many facets of human well being and climatic regime maintenance..

Healthy forests are more stable in the face of major stress than are forests that are near death.

Forest health can be enhanced by regular care by people with appropriate equipment and training.

Forest damage is more likely where there is no reservoir of local skill and no financial system built to facilitate the regular care of large forest areas in a proactive manner.

Forest Economic Liquidity:

Trees in forest settings produce no income until they are harvested after growing for periods of at least 10 years and frequently five to twenty decades. During that time maintenance of healthy trees may require regular inputs that involve human labor, equipment use, and the opportunity to remove useful but low value commodities.

As stressors from any source increase the level of caring activity may need to increase or lose the value previously accumulated, possibly adding to stress as well.

“Normal” (contemporary) forest ownership today generally includes abrogation of responsibility that normally goes with ownership, but is also subject to increasing demands from an out of touch public. Today ownership involves appreciation of forest amenities and avoidance of many of the proactive steps needed to maintain forest health. This practice deficiency has become part of the forest protection system in both public and not-for-profit forest ownership. It has been publicly acknowledged that the NGO forest protection sector has used funds available to acquire land and left all other normal maintenance functions adrift. Both public and NGO groups are faced with a huge job of catch up and regular maintenance for which there is no funding source.

Forests Can Provide a Source of Stable Local Jobs:

Rural communities benefit from regular careful treatment of working forests in many ways:

Reliable jobs

Regular supplies of sustainable local energy

Maintenance of rural infrastructure

Provision of a source of material for construction and manufacture of other items

Forest Maintenance Funding is Essential for Effective Care:

Maintenance of this sustainable part of our common good requires a means of funding for: the care, training, and infrastructure needed by those engaged in these activities.

All human media of exchange comes from the public trust and is ultimately based on the health and stability of the ecosystems that maintain the conditions for life as we know it.

Without life there is no wealth.

Without the trust that the funding will be forthcoming forests are left alone until the have mine-able value to pay those who would limit or control funding.

Forest maintenance and other long term environmental and infrastructure maintenance investments are different from the normal human economy in that they frequently have either delayed or single payout style value or have regular (or periodic) non-monetary outputs.

Further, in the case of forest maintenance, even though there are no regular payments from the forest to the owner from previous investments one must be able to put in more funds until the trees are mature.

In the current system, forest conversion can be forced simply because one does not have the funds to pay taxes. The presence of immediate economic alternatives may be an effective driver of conversion.

Forest Investment Facts:

Extensive forest ownership in an urban environment (all of MA forest is in an urban setting) is expensive and not something that a prudent investor would engage in unless it were coupled with the intent to convert that asset into cash in a relatively short time.

Each investment in forest health causes the owner to be poorer for the investment (since there is no reliable output in terms of cash payments from forest investment).

Each investment is the basis for continuation of the employment base in that area.

Each investment is needed to maintain the ownership and maintenance of special equipment and skills needed for handling both the continued maintenance and the recovery from periodic powerful natural events.

The economic stability of working forest ownership may relate directly to the maintenance of the provision of the public services that are being demanded from forests. Most of these services provide no direct payments to the owner of the forest, but may have significant effects to the community and the region. There is no effort to provide significant long term support to owners who make the commitment to maintain their forest so that that land may continue to provide those essential benefits.

Where there are public needs that can be filled by local forests it is incumbent upon the locality and the region to help the forest owner identify how to better safe guard these outputs and to cover any costs of proactive steps that would not be part of a normal maintenance program on that property. This stands in stark contrast to the present system where these increasing requirements are seen as obligations of the owner to a frequently irresponsible public.

Proactive Steps Needed to Enable Working Forest Maintenance:

Recognize working forests as a separate sector of the rural economy with special needs and special funding sources.

Construct a strong branch of public assistance that has the power to intervene on behalf of the owner with other agencies that seek to direct owner activity in ways that impact their stability.

Create a State (state, STATE)wide series of demonstration areas dedicated to the public good and forest health,

Create a series of regional strategic environmental funding entities that have sovereign ability to create credit for long term projects with terms that are appropriate to the outcomes from the projects.

Provide an operating environment where working forest owners are free from public intervention as long as there are no major errors committed, and within which there is the capability for sharing information about what is working and how to solve problems that seem to be occurring.

Recognize that there are no normal “best” management practices. There are only an array of acceptable practices and that a laboratory is needed where better management practices can be tested and demonstrated on an on going basis.

Authorize the creation of a new area of study within the existing forestry educational system for review and demonstration of long term site maintenance and enhancement practices.

Provide the mandate for forestry educators to explore the capability of forest management techniques to become a major component of climate change mitigation.

Courage in a Time of Apathy, Ambivalence and Misinformationtag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01b8d2a6f3e7970c2017-09-03T19:30:25-04:002017-09-03T19:33:45-04:00Courage in a Time of Apathy, Ambivalence and Misinformation: What does this have to do with forestry and rural life? By Alan C. Page, September 3, 2017 Forest ownership has been touted as something that is honorable and rewarding. However, when one gets close it is only rewarding in very...Alan Page

Courage in a Time of Apathy, Ambivalence and Misinformation:

What does this have to do with forestry and rural life?

By Alan C. Page, September 3, 2017

Forest ownership has been touted as something that is honorable and rewarding. However, when one gets close it is only rewarding in very special cases – when the land is purchased very cheaply, AND there are industries that need the products, AND a regulatory climate exists that allows the kind of regular activity that forest care is based on, AND money is not limiting, AND …. Further, forests take a long time to mature even when the site is excellent, there are expert practitioners, and there are markets for everything. So it is really all about money and time.

Recently, there has developed a new set of players who have entered the picture with very different agendas from what any that have been visible here to fore on the forestry scene, AND these players are as unaware of the impact they may have on forests and rural life; as most of us are of their existence. Caveats may be added at the end of the note as time permits – in any case there is a profound lesson that bears some discussion whatever the final situation turns out to be.

A courageous lady, wife, mother, past bank lawyer, researcher, a person with many friends, and now defendant under house arrest, Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf (HATJ), has revealed the Federal concern over the existence of long standing financial instruments that were not open for public access or discussion. She is under house arrest in Tennessee as of September 1, 2017 after being move to many different Federal detention centers. If the subject of her detention were of little importance the authorities would not have gone to the lengths that they have to try to silence her.

This Federal attention is over the private use of Treasury Direct Accounts (TDA) that appear to have been formed for every person that has had their birth recorded and apparently have significant values attached with no normal accounting associated with them. The actual characteristics of a TDA must be the subject of a much more detailed review than can be done here. But the HATJ case involves the release of ~$2,000,000 to a Tennessee resident who was apprehended by the FBI and charged with wire fraud. A very long transcript of the Federal Grand Jury proceedings is available for review. Heather is awaiting the release of the audio from the hearings because the transcript (and the proceedings from which it came) is so bizarre.

A little history of Heather’s past may help establish her importance in the power struggle of today. After serving as a bank compliance officer for many years, Heather was tasked with researching the financial and legal sectors to determine whether there were any ways to restructure these dysfunctional areas. Her report of these activities was published in 2012 and can be found here. Following this report for a trust that was formed to pursue these studies, One Peoples Public Trust (OPPT), she filed as series of UCC documents that legally ended all corporate power, both business and governmental. These filings were completed and accepted by the end of 2014. However, businesses and governments continued to function as if there had been no such determination. It also appears that these corporations also were able to use TDAs for their own benefit without the knowledge of the real owners. The apparent value of these TDAs and the implications of their exposure and open liquefaction (ready accessibility) seem to be the source of the recent Federal interest in HATJ.

HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO FORESTS AND RURAL LIFE?

Previous posts here have described the Adaptive Program for Agriculture (APA) and many other examples of fraud and perfidy that have been part of the global fabric of the past 150 years. Similarly the importance of banking regulations and deregulations to any long term activity has been discussed; as has the fraud that accompanies the idea that infinite wealth should be a goal of the competent investor.

Forest care and much of responsible rural life require the regular availability of local residents with time, capable practitioners, and energy or the funding to purchase these commodities. In the past these facets were an accepted part of normal rural community life. Also the demands on the environment by a sparsely distributed human population were light enough that nature took care of much of the burden. The collapse of small farms and the absence of rural jobs and educational opportunities for youth that prepared them to understand the complexities of the natural environment have left us with a mining mentality that makes the caring component that previously came from nature both extremely important and impossible to replicate given that we must pay for all activity with credit or currency.

The reality is that funds are only available to those who own banks, have access to other people’s money, or have discretionary income streams that allow the immediate and consistent payment of debt service. Earlier proactive sources of longer term funding, like the Federal Land Bank, have been compromised by design to mere shadows of their original vision.

After WWII the success of the APA was so extraordinary, and other secret developments, that provided many of the technologies that now are used to connect and automate life, were so revolutionary (and are now being declassified) that there has developed a strata of ultra rich individuals and entities that seem to have no need for the rest of society and seem to be willing to accept the destruction of the basis of life itself.

Into this tragic matrix enters this courageous woman who has presented herself as a defender of those who have been left out of the upper strata. She has allowed the entities that she had previously identified as being corrupt beyond redemption to attempt to silence and stymie her attempts to restart or replace the current corrupt system. This challenge is still active and is something that all who have interests in the sustainability of planetary natural systems ought to be aware of her plight and to take actions to make sure that she is not silenced. The current system needs to be replaced – while TDAs have a nice possibility of offering everyone assets of their own, there are many issues that exist with such a system. These issues will become the topic of the rest of this note and man more to come:

Before offering any judgmental commentary on TDAs there needs to be much more information about what they are, who uses them, how do they do it, and why they are so secret. The following are merely speculation or food for thought.

Apparently the number of entities that have access to TDAs now is relatively limited, and if Ronald Bernard is to be believed, the controllers of such a group are ruthless. So the assess comes with some control.

Imagine if common access without controls existed for 350+million Americans? Several commentators have listed many of these issues so the links to their work are here and here.

Long term life maintaining and life enhancing practices need some form of regular funding that is much different from the current short term funding that farmers commonly access.

Funding of ecologically damaging practices and offensive capabilities (many of which are or have been secret) need to be curtailed or eliminated. On the other hand everyone should be trained and capable of coming to the aid of their family and neighbors should the need arise.

HOW DOES FOREST CULTURE (SILVICULTURE) AND RURAL LIFE IN GENERAL FIT INTO THIS PICTURE?

It appears that the details of this discussion are best left as part of the Planetary Code of Conduct mentioned a while ago. The recent misinformation programs and the isolation of the general populous from actually doing sustainable things because of the ghettoization / urbanization of the globe will have to be replaced with realistic local programs for support and decision making as technologies change how things are done and who does them.

A question that should be on all forestry agendas could involve how much automation and drone or robot use should be permitted in forests? How are Artificial Intelligences going to be limited when connected without human intervention (if they are not already beyond human control)?

As stated before forest care / silviculture is something that may require much funding as environmental changes develop. Wherever humans are needed they must be paid a living and prosperous wage as opposed to the current situation of near slave conditions with no benefits. On the other hand owners need to be able to be proactive without impeding regulation. If there are reasons for local control of certain activities the vetting of such activities should be done at public expense and be done in a manner where the vetting period is scheduled to allow scheduled processes to occur as needed. The existence of funding sources such as TDAs or other venues should remove the economic impediments to appropriate care and review.

What Could You Possibly Mean?tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01b7c91adc15970b2017-08-29T17:55:53-04:002017-08-29T17:55:53-04:00The following is a reply to a request for more clarification on the previous post to this blog that was sent as a message to several government officials: Dear Correspondent, I am surprised by your request, since the Senator has never responded to any of my earlier attempts to make...Alan Page

The following is a reply to a request for more clarification on the previous post to this blog that was sent as a message to several government officials:

Dear Correspondent,

I am surprised by your request, since the Senator has never responded to any of my earlier attempts to make contact. In the intervening time I have continued my researches into why the forests on the land of massachusetts (that I have tried to manage for nearly fifty years) are not able to be cared for better or regarded as a source of future community value. In doing this research I came across the One Peoples Public Trust - Report and the arrest of the lawyer who was tasked with the investigation and filing of the UCC forms that were designed to restart the system of governance and finance that we still struggle under.

What the lawyer who did the investigation found was that the financial and judicial systems were so corrupt that while she was tasked with evaluation of ways to reform them - she finally concluded that there were no redeeming qualities and that they must be shut down.

You may not be aware of the existence of Treasury Direct Accounts (Straw Man Accounts) that are formed for each person with a recorded birth certificate, but this lawyer, Heather Ann Tucci-Jarraf, is now in custody in Tennessee after being detained while seeking audience with President Trump, for assisting various people with their efforts to access their personal TD Account.

The relevance of this to our current governance is several fold:

1) If I am on the right track the TDAs offer a way to fund long term projects, forest management being one, that requires regular attention by competent people, has no cash flows until late in the growth cycle, will require sharing of a wide range of equipment that is not now available to most forest owners, could materially improve the value performance of forest land if done well, and will require much more information than is now provided by any public agency - we have not been able to find any public institution that was interested in hosting a 150 year long broad forest production research program (and of course we have no funding for such an ambitious undertaking.)

2)Our experience has been that the sources of governance have been more interested in concentrating population in dependency settings (cities and suburbs) rather than rural sustainable enclaves, and in doing so have put in place a series of unhelpful regulations and laws that have fostered the "mining" culture that is now the forest resource community. So if we are going to be able to do good things in forests there are many changes that will have to be addressed - one way to address them is to use the TDA funds to pay for the "compliance" with the current regulations and another is to use those same sources to lobby for change. Of course this is what banks have been doing for the past several hundred years and they will not welcome any new guys on the block!

3) If there truly are two different jurisdictions and law systems (the law of the sea and the law of the land) and if the OPPT has done its job well then all that is left to do is to claim the law of the land for things that obtain to the land and to get the corrupt entities to recognize that there is a ground swell of support to call an end to their tyranny or financial terrorism that we have endured since the formation of this nation.

I have spent a lot of time taking the Chief State Foresters of the last several administrations around to see the outcomes of some of our testing and efforts. While we get some thanks and promises from these appointees nothing ever happens - because there is no money - by design. So I am fed up with the current state of affairs and fully understand that there are government programs to withdraw patents on technologies that could clean up our messes, repower everything, and allow humanity to do other things that humans are capable of, and I'm willing to be a participant in a new kind of sustainable society.

If I have made any errors in the things I have found so far I feel it is appropriate for those who have other insights to add them to the discussion before I get too far afield.

The Senator's district is being over run with invasive plants that will materially damage the natural value production of these lands over the next twenty years. The outcomes of climate change if allowed to proceed will also damage the biosphere as we know it. Military technology could do to massachusetts what is being done to Huston and much of texas by Hurricane Harvey (whether this is an unfortunate natural event or an example of weather engineering is still up for debate)? If such things are out growths of the corporate and shadow government systems, they need to be stopped. If there are things that the use of TDAs for good should be doing, then it is time to discuss how to go about this and how to do the testing and protection of the testers to get these things started.

I wish you all well and hope that the Senator's district could become a stable place where those who choose a rural experience may coexist with those who do not.

Alan C. Page, Ph.D., Research Forester - MA License #184

Evolving Reality - Impossible Forestrytag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01348777e27a970c01bb09bcd720970d2017-08-26T08:06:49-04:002017-08-26T08:19:46-04:00This is a good question and one that deserves some real in depth research (but not for the reasons that you may think of immediately.) Alan Page

A Common Question from an anonymous forest landowner:

"Hi, I received your email. My property is already in 61A why would I need to do this again? Each Fall I redo my paperwork under Agricultural. My concern is not wanting to upset what I already have in place and what has been in place now for a very long time. I apologize for asking but I'm not sure of the difference and if you are aware of our 61A status."

My reply (these findings have recently crystallized for me after many years of frustration):

This is a good question and one that deserves some real in depth research (but not for the reasons that you may think of immediately.)

Your “state forester” knows that I have been doing a lot of research over the past few years and this is where I am at for now! I have also included the Ex. Director (consultant?) of the Massachusetts Forest Alliance and the Massachusetts Forest Stewardship Coordinator (chief state forester) in this note so that they can have a chance to correct my commentary if need be. These should be friendly and helpful contacts for you as things progress. (However, as you will find by following the links below things are not always what they seem! If this statement is STRANGE then you have been duped, snookered, manipulated - entertained to death - and like most of us have a lot to learn and undo.)

The CH61A program that you are operating under first assumes that the Town Corporation, that calls itself "Your Town", has a right to regulate and tax your use of your property. This is the area where the real research is needed, and I try to do my part in writing forest management plans by providing links and background about things that I too am studying and learning about all the time. However, until you are ready, confident enough, to challenge the Town, you are and will be operating within statues that have been put in place by the corporations that now control our lives. CH61/61A is one such statute (the essence of what I have gleaned so far is that in order for these statutes to have control you must agree to their jurisdiction, and they use various methods to convince you that there are no other alternatives). There are very definite steps that need to be taken to recover your personal identity and to recover the control of corporations that may have been set up using your name as an asset base for the governments function without your knowledge or permission.

The corporate State of Massachusetts CH61A statute actually requires that forest land contained within a farm that is so classified should have a forest management plan in order to be included in the tax reduction program called CH61A that you are now covered by. It is fortunate for you (and a gift to you by the Assessors of “Your Town”) that your land is all covered by CH61A. If it weren't so treated you might have already lost it for your inability to pay the taxes - this is just part of the economic game that has been played so successfully by the ultra rich for the past 100+ years.

The "legal" cutting of forest trees within the limits of the corporate State of Massachusetts and under the jurisdiction of that corporation, which you have voluntarily agreed to be bound by, also requires that you have a 10 year forest management plan (updated every 10 years) and a forest cutting plan (FCP) each time you harvest more than 25,000 board feet of timber in a years time. There are advantages to the FCP in that it redirects "control" of wetland crossings to the state forester rather than the Town Conservation Commission - there are other issues that I will detail in the forest management plan.

I too struggle with this paperwork all the time and am learning why and how this situation developed and over time will have recommendations about what to do (if anything) to detach one's property from this control matrix. But for now this is the way we have chosen to function (my self included as a small landowner) and we play by these rules. I do expect this to change and possibly sooner than we might think, but I am not in a position yet to make recommendations of what steps to take to get out of this control set.

The one good thing I can offer is that at this time you have been given the cost of the management plans by the State of Massachusetts for the land you own. The plans you get will have cost you nothing and do not obligate you to do anything once you receive the completed plans. If you still want to harvest timber as we have discussed and want to continue to agree that the Town has jurisdiction over your activities then you will need to also prepare a Forest Cutting Plan that is geared to the management statements in the forest management plan. Also on the plus side your land will grow wonderful trees and is in a condition where the tall trees and invasive plants that now occupy your land are in the way of starting a new and potentially better crop of trees - that is my job and I can show you what a forest that has been treated well actually can produce. So you are not doing a paper shuffle for nothing!

Another plus is that I think the financial system is about to change (see the OPPT link below) in ways that will make possible the kind of long term programs that REAL forest STEWARDSHIP (and the responsible maintenance of most of the human connections to their environment) require. In the past it has been almost impossible to do the forest maintenance that enabled the things I would show you (that we have done over the past 40 years) because of banking regulations and government controls that codified legal funding into very short term components. There may be other things in the works (than those documented in the links below) that will do more and different things that may have similar results - we will have to wait and see what develops. There is much more to say about this and much will be in the forest management plan (and on the Common Good Forestry website) so for now I suggest that either you do a lot more study on your own or you stay within the system until I have done my homework more completely.

You will have to sign the papers I asked for or ask me to send paper copies to you.

For starters if you want to study more, you might look at two different sites:

OPPT Initial Investigation: The Paradigm Report

I M Power Absent Limits

To the officials who were included as recipients to this email: Things are changing rapidly in ways that we all need to be aware of. The corporate structures that now regulate and destabilize our small (actually any scale) scale forest activities may already be illegal because of the findings of corruption documented in the OPPT report and the resulting UCC filings by Heather Ann. You may be called upon to suppress the reporting the OPPT. I understand and wish you well, in the mean time it will be interesting if you too can come to understand how the short term banking regulations have crushed the ability of normal forest owners to do anything other than occasional mining of their property for value - the real purpose of the current FCP regulations is to permit the use of heavy equipment in sensitive situations in pursuit of existing value (“Mining” in the guise of long term management).