Two more women-learning-python things

She’s meeting regularly with a group who are working through an introductory Python book together, and her most recent post describes a recent programming effort, her trials and failures and eventual success, and what she came to realise:

The point is: itâ€™s in me. I wasnâ€™t sure that is was, and now I knowâ€”it is.

And what, exactly, is â€œitâ€? It is the bug. It is the combination of native curiosity and stubbornness that made me play around with the code and take some wild guesses instead of running straight to Google (or choosing to stay within the bounds of the exercise). That might sound like a small thing, but I know it is not. I was determined to make the program do what I wanted it to do, I came up with a few guesses as to how to do that, and I kept trying different things until I succeeded (and then I felt thrilled).

As much as I have to learn, I know now that I really am hooked. And that Iâ€™ll get there.

The community’s at intro-to-cs.dreamwidth.org. You’ll need a Dreamwidth account to join and post, but anyone’s welcome to follow along without signing up. If you want a DW invite code, let me know in comments — I’ve got a heap still to give away! I’ve signed up, because I’m sure my education’s got a lot of the same gaps.

I love hearing about women teaching themselves programming. Got any other links or stories like that to share?

7 thoughts on “Two more women-learning-python things”

A small story: when I managed (by dint of many hours and much swearing) to make my first Python program ever actually run, I emailed the colleague who had gotten me started in high glee. “Congratulations,” he emailed back. “You’ve bootstrapped your internal Python interpreter.”