Emphasizes the "Party" aspect as much as the "sex" part, making things feel more real

Attractive models, many of which have fairly limited exposure, keeping things fresh.

The group sex tends to really be group sex, with most films having at least one scene with the majority of the models active at the same time.

Most movies contain multiple sex scenes.

Cons:

While the site is entirely in English, and many of the scenes end with the site or network name being painted on the models (in English), the dialogue is in Russian with English subtitles. Nothing in the site description mentions this, and the video previews generally don't contain dialogue.

Models are identified by only a first name, which rarely corresponds to the name used by the model in other work.

Archive is a bit spotty, with movies missing from the sequence, and a few older ones lack sound.

Very infrequent updates

Bottom Line:

The site is decent, but the infrequent updates means that a long-term subscription is of little value once you've found the archive scenes that interest you. The Russian audio isn't necessarily a downside, but the site should be more up front about it, especially as the site goes for a plotty approach with a lot of dialogue.

- Not for the faint of heart, probably among the most extreme sites on the internet
- Female model name should be more prominent

Bottom Line:

Let me start with a few of caveats:

• This is probably one of the most extreme hardcore sites on the internet. Consider this a “may not be suitable for all audiences” warning.
• Many of the scenes use a r@ape fantasy as the scenario. I say this for two reasons, first to warn potential members of this fact, and second to tell people that I had an email chat with Khan and while he okayed describing the scenes in this way he said that using the actual word could cause problems for this site so if you’re commenting DO NOT USE THE WORD lest you incur the wrath of Khan.
• Each scene, regardless of the scene set-up, has an interview with the model both before and after the scene. The initial interview CLEARLY shows that the model will be shooting the scene fully informed of what the scene will entail and fully consents to it and that there is a safe word in use. The concluding interview makes it clear that the model had nothing occur that she did not fully consent to. In all the interviews I watched the models reported that they enjoyed the scene.

In all my years of buying porn online this is possibly the most extreme hardcore site I’ve ever joined. Other Kink sites come close, but the use of a particular scenario in many of the scenes is what put this over the top. A membership here is definitely not for everybody.

Unlike a lot of other Kink sites, this one does use a scene setup. There is a storyline that plays out at the beginning. What I mean that is with sites like Device Bondage and The Training of O, which can be quite intense, there is really no scene setup. A model does a shoot and that’s it. Here, there is a story and much more often than not that story involves some sort of force by a group of men against a woman. No matter how you slice it, most of the scenes here involve simulated r@pe. If you think you’d be offended by that, and I’m sure a lot of people would be, then don’t subscribe. Apart from the setup, the entire scene tends to follow the script with lots of slapping, spitting and generally rough sex.

If done wrong, these scenes could likely cause some problems for Kink, but each scene has an interview with the model both before and after the scene where it is made clear that model knows what she’s getting into and then the post-scene interview confirms that. There is no mistaking that this is pure fantasy.

Speaking of the models, one thing that struck me about the site, and it likely speaks to Kink’s good reputation in the business, are the number of A-list porn models who appear here. With material this extreme you’d think that only the hardest of the hardcore or fetish models would be here, but that isn’t the case. Models like Chastity Lynn, Casey Calvert and Tara Lynn Foxx are here. Sure, they aren’t exactly wallflowers but I am still pleasantly surprised to see them here.

There are currently 59 scenes uploaded with a new one being added each week. Most of the scenes last about an hour, with some exceeding that.

As with all other Kink sites, they get the technical stuff right. The site is well laid out and the user can change how the site looks by selecting how much information will be displayed on the main page.

One minor quibble is that with each scene the entire cast is credited. I have no problem with that, but the female should be given top billing in all cases. Sometimes you have to read through several names before you get to the female model. I buy porn to see the women. The men are just props.

Streaming and downloads are both available, and Kink offers a broad range of choices. There are four streaming resolution options available. Downloads are available in WMV or MP4 with each format being available in five resolutions. I downloaded the MP4 HD option which is 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. (For comparison, “large” comes in at 960x540 at 1500kb/s and “medium” is 640x480 at 825 kb/s.) If you can spare the space it is definitely worth it to download the HD files. They are large though, with the average being 2GB.

Videos are also available as clips if you have a slow connection or only want one specific part of a scene.

The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out with five or more scenes in the queue.

To add more value to this membership, it includes a membership to Bound Gangbangs. BGB stopped updating in August 2012. A member explained here explained that this was due to billers being uncomfortable with the content so in order to save it the models were no longer to be bound. There are 93 scenes that are pretty much like what you’ll find on HCG but with the models in bondage while it happens.

Obviously the audience for this material is limited, but if you like this extreme porn (with full consent from the model) this is an excellent choice in a rare niche. I’m not aware of any other sites like this, but if there are some, I’m betting that this is better than the others.

Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.

Bottom Line:

STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.

-500 scenes, plus access to 80 more at teenfidelity.com
-production quality is as good as it gets
-gorgeous 1080 HD video on all the newer stuff
-large, high-quality photo sets
-women are hot
-male talent Ryan often ends scenes with not just one orgasm but two or three orgasms (how does he do that?!)
-scenes often feel like cutting-edge of porn: innovative set-ups, pleasingly unusual camera angles, etc.
-full-access 2-day trial available for $8.95 -- and mine actually lasted for 4 days
-fast, no-hassle downloading

Cons:

-same male (Ryan) in every scene, which might not appeal to everyone
-more often than not, the woman has big fake boobies, a turn-off for me. also some ladies have obviously had facial work, another con IMHO
-several scenes include male putting hand or hands around girl's neck as if strangling, which always turns me off. Less of this would be better.
-several scenes have BDSM theme, another big turn-off for me. I didn't even bother viewing these scenes -- a damn shame, especially because the girls are usually gorgeous
-Kelly Madison herself joins a bunch of the scenes, which can be great, but can also be grating, as her mood is consistently "goofing-off" instead of "turned-on" and can be a distraction

Bottom Line:

This is definitely some top-notch porn -- some of the best production quality anywhere -- and I highly recommend for any enthusiast -- between this and the included membership to teenfidelity.com, there is plenty of terrific content

I'd give a rating of 100 if there was less prevalence of BDSM scenes, more natural boobies and less plastic surgery

* Part of large network of Russian teens
* Very good quality videos
* Maintains an amateur feel with typical Russian sets - this is not intended to be a glamour site
* Hot Russian teens
* Heaps of bonus sites
* Download managers with no issues
* Good download speeds
* No spam
* Easy to navigate your way around

Cons:

* The sites could be better organized
* Model names are inconsistent not only across the different sites but also within the same site

Bottom Line:

These sites seem to have gone through a revamp and tidied up their act - but there is still room for improvement. If you join one site, you get access to all the others - except for TeenCasualSex; for some reason, this site doesn't give you access to the other networks.

The video quality is very good for the newer videos (from 2012) with 1080p and bitstream rate of 6000+. Of course, the older content is not as good - but then isn't that true for all sites?

There are a lot of beautiful Russian (and some Czech) teens here. Yes, you'll see them on Teen Mega World but I really liked this network - maybe I just got bored with TMW. The sets are nothing glamorous, which I liked because it gave the scenes are more realistic feel rather than the typical white-washed, overexposed, glamour sites that seem to be the fashion right now. If you've been to Russia or to a Russian home, then you'll know that the settings are authentic.

What I liked is seeing the teens doing their stuff. You see teen couples - unlike most American sites where it's "teen" girls with much, much older men.

There are model names listed for each scene and you can search them but the names can be inconsistent. Also, it was irritating that despite being a network, you have to enter your username and password for each site - and you cannot elect your own username or password.

When joining I looked at several sites and noticed that not all offer the same terms. Some offer 1 month + 7 days for the full price, but I joined through this one and got a reduced price for 1 month.

Updates are not that frequent: on average there is one or two across the entire network.

+The content is all exclusif and they add a new scene each week.
+You get access to teen fidelity as well.
+All videos can be downloaded in at least 480p which they increased to 540p in 2008 and most of the videos after that date are also offered in 720p
+The 100 more recent videos are now also offered in 1080p.
+They offer a B.T.S video of each shoot.
+All scenes have an photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution is approximately 900x600.
+Their selection of performers is top notch.
+You can stream the videos online and you can even jump to a specific part of the scene based on keywords.
+They have a playlist editor where you can create your own clips of the scenes.
+You can search based on whether a performer has natural breats or implants.

Cons:

-There is very little not to like about the site except that the number of enhanced performers significantly outnumber the natural ones.
-Another negative is that a good portion of the models have tattoos.many of the models
-The only two performers are Kelly and her husband Ryan.(not an issue for me but could be for some).

Bottom Line:

*I keep returning to this site because they keep putting out some of the best porn I've seen. There's very little that I don't like. That's not to say that all the scenes are as good as the others but there is a certain consistency in regards to quality. They even do some scenario based scenes from time to time which is a nice bonus for people like me who like their porn with a story.

*I didn't find anything really wrong with the site except that I would love to see two or more updates per week as opposed to just one. I know I'd be willing to pay more for that since it would mean a lot more of what I like.

**The only reason why I'm not giving the site a perfect score is because I want to see them hire a few more natural models.

-Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.

Cons:

-Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.

Bottom Line:

CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.

-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.

-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.

BOTTOM LINE:

Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.

Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.

So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.

If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.

The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.

The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.

In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.

I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.

-368 scenes, more than half on them in HD, mostly 1080p
-Superb photography from the very beginning, large photosets included and also available zipped. These days the high res photo size is more than enough
-Gorgeous models all over from the earlier time greats like Simony Diamond and Alexa May to the fresher names like Doris Ivy and Ashley. Nothing to complain as long as you are in to European looks
-As is the case with AssholeFever, same can be said here: Always gives what you expect, which is a DP
-The whole 21Sextury works flawlessly in my opinon these days. Fast, good looking, easy to navigate
-If the theme is what you like, this network has a few others updating regularly with anal stuff. Gapeland, ButtPlays and AssholeFever are more or less active and very focused

Cons:

-Only updates every second week these days
-Even here they could have multiple girls in a scene even though the numbers are more understandable for an apparent reason
-You could say that as whole the 21Sextury is not going through it's best days. Many sites were split over to 21Sextreme and especially the sites like AnalTeenAngels, CutiesGalore and LezCuties are not doing so strong

Bottom Line:

Another one of the two top sites that are in my opinion holding the whole 21Sextury together with their regular update schedules and consistent quality. I thought this one also deserved a heads up and while I adjusted score on AssholeFever up, this one I think I had given a bit too high score and am now dropping it to more reasonable number.

This site used to be a weekly updating with rather guaranteed update until some time in 2012 when it changed to one update every two weeks. Like AssholeFever, this site has been going on for a long time and is probably produced together with it. I would guess that they shoot anal and dp content without really making a difference between and only then release them according to the content on either of these two sites.

One of the best things about DPFanatics is the very high quality of almost every aspect. There is no compromising with the models, they are almost 100% hot (guys are the same few for those who care). Same can be said of production values and the quality of video and photography. Lighting is very professional, image is always crisp and still they can manage to keep the file sizes in reasonable limits. I cannot find anything to complain about with the mp4 H.264 files in 1080p. Old scenes are great too even if the quality of the video is not the best. The photos however are.

While there is really no story to the scenes, they are not straight forward gonzo action either. Settings are varied, scenes are often shot outdoors as well as in various interiors. They have some themed scenes as well with hospitals, nurse costumes, unavoidable holiday themes, jails and such. Nothing too fetishy. However it seems that the current director is not a big fan of outdoors as there has been very little of that lately.

This was one of the sites that originally drew me to the 21Sextury and it is still one of the few I really like. Many of the absolute best scenes in the networks are released here.

+Content is all exclusif and is from a niche that is not really represented.
+They add one new scene a week and all content is dated.
+You can view material online.
+You can download the videos in both WMV and MP4 and each versions is offered in normal resolution as well as HD.
+They have a very nice selection of models to choose from and they have started to add some Europeans to the mix.
+Membership to one site gives you discount on the other sites.
***Current membership also gives you access to bound gangbang***

Cons:

-I'm going to put this in the con because it's important that people be aware that this is an intense site and the content is definetely not for everyone.
-The site is quite tiny with only 14 scenes. You do get access to BGB(that adds another 35 scenes) but I don't know if that is going to change in the near futur or if maybe they will incorporate some or all of the content into this one. Clearly they don't need two sites with almost identical content.
-There are pics but this is primarily a video only site so they aren't really worth talking about.
-This is a small con but two of the performers on this site have done scenes for BGB so you aren't really getting much of anything new.

Bottom Line:

*If you know Kink then you have a good idea of their business practices. If you don't then it's important to know that they take the well being of their performers to heart so although the shoots are quite intense. At no time is the girls in any danger to their health. The before and after interview makes that quite obvious.

*I'm going to stay on the fence for now and say that the content has potential. I sort of like the idea behind the site and the women do appear to really be into it but this is still forceable gangbangs so there is play acting done from all the players and it can be a little disturbing. That's why I don't know if I will join as often as I might for some of their other sites because I think they are too intense for my taste. The slapping, chocking and spitting are not my cup of tea and sadly most of these are in all of their shoots. I don't care if the performer is okay with any of these things because I'm not and I'm the one paying.

*I also can't help but feel that the scenarios get close to rape and that is a little hard for me to enjoy even though it's all fake. Mind you BGB wasn't much different than this one but it sometimes felt a little less intense.

**This site will appeal to anyone who enjoyed bound gangbang or was interested in joining that site. I would highly recommend that anyone who prefers more passion filled porn avoid this site because there is none of that here.**

***The score has less to do with my feelings in regards to the content and more to do with the site's potential. I may not have enjoyed myself as much as I could have but that doesn't mean that they don't do an excellent job producing the videos.***

- Hot girls all around. Granted they all seem to fall into the typical porn star mold and tend to have fake boobs)
- Great quality mostly 1080p 3.2 mbps. Everything is as least: "DVD Quality" 720X540 3mbps. Of the 90 or so shoots their divided about 1/2 and 1/2 between "HD" quality and "DVD" quality.
- pictures (mostly screen shoots) are available in zip format for all scenes.
- "trailer" downloads are available and useful to see if the scene is interesting to you before you download the whole thing.
- part of a huge network (naughty america) with over 5,000 scenes available.
- hot fantasy setups. Of all the sites in the network this is one of my favorites.
- good organization to help you find what you're looking for with keywords and clean interface.

Cons:

- Mainstream focus means you see "vanilla" fantasies.
- poor directing. I think of some of these girls that have shoot for other companies (like kink or manojobs) and they've been much hotter.
- while the network updates everyday this site only updates about once every 3-4 weeks.

Bottom Line:

2 chicks is one of the best NA has to offer. The network is often up on sale just watch their twitter feed and website for offers.

Bottom Bottom Line: there's plenty of FFM action on this site with top notch talent. The preview section let's you know exactly what you're getting. When they run a $10 special it's worth checking out and seeing the work of your favorite girls.

+Content appears to be all exclusif.
+You get access to 3 other sites.
+They have a very nice selection of teen models.
+You can stream videos online.
+They offer multiple download options for their videos which include ipod/PSP and go all the way to HD at 1080P.
+You can download the photosets in a single zip file.
+The content is all dated and they are still updating.

Cons:

-The site is tiny with only 20 scenes and since they only update about twice a month then it's going to take along time to accumulate a decent amount of content.
-Their idea of High quality picscs is 720x480 so not remotely close to HQ.
-Each video includes two girls with one guy so this may not appeal to people looking for some one-on-one.
-There are no search options and most of the performers are given a different name than the one they are more commonly known under.

Bottom Line:

*I don't know if this site can appeal to anyone other than people who are really into oral sex because each video is basically two girls giving a guy a BJ for over half an hour. There is some lesbian action between the girls like kissing, breast play and some pussy licking but that is a small part of the video. There's no sex between the guy and the girls.

*Some of the videos are nearly an hour long and that seems to be on the long side of things. The videos are all well shot and well lighted so no complaints in that department but I don't know how many people will want to sit through a half hour BJ scene and since some of the videos are nearly an hour long then that is an even longer BJ scene.

*The bulk of the girls appearing on this site have at least one scene available on a site in the network and they also do BJ on that video so you are only getting a longer BJ scene here and the added girl to the mix.

*I got access to the site with my first anal quest membership and although this type of content does very little for me. I thought I should at least add a review since there are currently none available and maybe there are some people who might be interested.

*This would not be a good stand alone site but if you are into this type of fetish and really like anal as well then you should be happy with it. If you aren't into long BJ scenes and don't like anal then avoid the entire network because that is the bulk of their content.

*I'm boosting my score a little since you get access to some great sites with your membership.

- The site has a large content with currently 72 parties
-It contains longer scenes with some partying, which creates a more personal atmosphere than just bedroom sex. It also leads to the performers looking more like real students getting together.
-The site offers different file sizes, including HD quality
-They have young, attractive girls, who look natural and not pumped up with botox and silicon
-There's a variety of party themes / locations (Halloween, Xmas, locations sauna, hut)

Cons:

-They are using the same guys over and over again, which gets a bit boring after a while. They should use some variety like with the girls.
-The camera work is often rather unprofessional with shaky pictures, bad lighting etc.
-The movies are sometimes not in a great quality, even if you watch them HD, they still appear a bit grizzling

Bottom Line:

In spite of the negative points mentioned above, this is a very good site.
The best thing is that most of the parties don't look fake. The first of the four to five vids of each scene is some kind of warm up with the girls and guys meeting and talking to each other.
Unlike many party sites, where this looks very clumsy and fake, they appear to enjoy themselves on this site.
With mebership to this site you get bonus membership to currently 5 other sites, most of which are also good.
To sum it up, this is a very good site, which I can highly recommend.

The premise of this site is groups of sexily-clothed females and one (or two) guy ending up geting stripped naked, with the girls wanking off the guy(s) and having a laugh at the guy whilst doing so, but some scenes feature blowjobs or full sex.
Attractive models, some wearing lingerie, some young, some a little older but all girls with sexy attitude, showing teasing bits of cleavage and legs/ass.
Decent video quality 856x480 and 3Mbps quality, but not HD.
Reasonable download speeds.
Easy to navigate.
Forums allow you to discuss content and suggest scenes - this is a great way of involving members.
Photo sets for each scene.
Includes membership of two other smaller sites, Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick.
Quite a bit of content - over 300 scenes.

Cons:

Some video quality is quite poor at low 800kbps bitrate with interlacing, so much so, that in some parts of a video, the girl's hand wanking the cock can't be seen as it becomes a blur of horizontal lines. Some content is only at 512x290.
Expensive regional billing.
No search facility and very basic navigation.
Scenes are ordered according to date added.
Model list is not alphabetically indexed, making it more difficult to find a model, though scenes for a particular model are listed under her details.
Model info for the scene isn't hyperlinked and doesn't tally with the model index, e.g. one scene mentions Kelly as the actress but there is no such Kelly in the model index.

Bottom Line:

Mostly handjobs in this site but a few BJs and full sex in some scenes.
The girls keep their clothes on but in some scenes they unbutton or remove their tops to reveal their breasts in a teasing way in order to get the guy to cum.
The guys are quite timid but one guy stands out as also being quite comical in his timidity.
If you enjoy the fantasy of a woman taking control and getting you off, then this site is for you.

On the majority of scenes I'm glad of the join here, its far from perfect but very few sites are. It is quite unique content and one of the leaders in this party niche in my eyes as the girls are the hottest.

There good variety of girls 232 to choice from but obviously some are in the same movie with others.

There is 67 parties currently to choose from so plenty to keep you occupied.

You get some great insight into the girl's personalities here with them being open and look to be generally having a good time with friends.

Good choice of video downloads

mp4 720p
avi 576p
mp4 432p
mpv 320p

Cons:

Huge filesizes, the 720p HD mp4 scenes and they average 5 scenes an episode vary but I found they could be too huge for me sometimes 5gb or more a episode. They do give you and option of avi 576p which seemed around 3/4 of the size of its HD sister. I opted for avi and did tend to preview a scene to see if it was group sex before I download. I have enough girl on boy stuff so unless she was a fav I gave these scenes a miss.

The girls sometimes didn't get naked or have sex which I found annoying on some vids, you go to the hassle of getting a girl there at least tell her to get her clothes off and join in or don't bother turning up. I found some scenes would of benefitted on some behind the scenes direction to tell them to change position or do something else as some scenes drag.

Same guys in nearly every vid, I am not looking at the guys so not a major con but would be good to see them having sex with some other people from the same 3 guys nearly in every vid of the network.

Bottom Line:

Overall I rate the site its get some good stuff and nice to see some of my fav girls in something apart from one on one boy/girl sex hardcore. I've always been a fan or orgies, the more girls the better in my eyes but they can be hard to film and do right, few have managed to create classic orgie movies, focusing on the action can be difficult for the best of camera men/women. Here the camera work sure could be improved but I guess it's all done on the premissis that its a home movie of a group of friends have a sex party and the camera crew is them.

Theres some scenes with little nudity or none at all which does get tiresome and I think the site would be improved to have the option of the highlights on one vid and an edited best of, they go to the hassle of subtitling the movies (which is nice) so they could do it.

I would of though preferred more anal scenes here but I guess not every girl is into anal so they let them be natural and do what they want.

Each video documents an evening at a Prague swingers club attended mostly by amateurs and consists of a broad spectrum of singles, couples, age and body types. In 2006 when the 1st video was made there was a lot of obvious nervousness in the participants as they became familiar with the scene. As the series progresses with about 2 videos released each year up to the present, the swing experience in Prague is more familiar and the participants more at ease. All activity takes place in a dedicated house with all the amenities including an indoor pool, bar and many play rooms.

Video & sound quality is good and the overall look is realistic.

English subtitles are provided which allows understanding of the interplay among the players.

Cons:

As the series has progressed, the focus shifts as the videographer tries to entice participants to play with him instead of just being the observer. The style of the earlier videos consisted of couples and groups having their fun with the camera just recording the event has now changed and is nowhere as erotic. The earlier videos usually included playroom scenes with most of the guests for the evening playing together which does not often happen in the later videos.

The participants in the later episodes seem to be less amateur, more experienced, returnees and possibly local sex workers.

The subscription costs are high for the quantity of swinger material available on the site although access is allowed to 3 sister sites.

Bottom Line:

I recommend this site to anyone who enjoys spontaneous amateur group scenes with normal looking people.

I'm a fan of the European style of porn which features more typical looking people and not exclusively the bronzed, tanned, enhanced, 20 yr olds found in mainstream US porn. Czech Mega Swingers provides an appealing counterpoint to the 'porn star' mentality of US porn.

The site should return to the earlier style with the camera as an observer and not a participant.

Participants in the swing evenings are solicited by local and on-line adverts promising free booze, free sex and payment if one participates in a filmed sex scene.

The Czech Mega Swingers content was originally posted on the swingersakce.cz site which is part of the freevideo.cz group of Czech porn sites. The freevideo.cz sites including swingersakce.cz have been re-edited, reformatted, english subtitles added and moved to servers available in the US and access available by subscription. Unfortunately one cannot access the original Czech site if accessing the site from a non-European net address.

+There are 398 videos and they add a new one every week.
+All the videos after January 2008 can all be downloaded in WMV and Quictime at 960x540 and 1280x720. Videos prior to date are 640x480.
+You can download a solo and BTS video starring the model form each shoot.
+The videos are all extremely well shot with the right camera angles, lighting and an impressive job from all performers.
+There is a photoset for each video shoot and these can be download as complete zip files. Resolution varies from set to set but the medium qulaity are at least 900x600 and 1300x900 for high quality ones.
+You can search for scenes under ethnicity of the model and/or whether she has natural breast or implants.
+Content is all dated.
+You can use a download manager.
++You can get a 3 day full access for 10$.

Cons:

-A large percentage of the models have implants and/or tattoos.
-I wish their search option had more keywords to help members find certain types of videos.
-The only 2 performers appearing with the models are Kelly and her husband.

Bottom Line:

*This is my second time at porn fidelity and the site keeps getting better. I had a hard time coming up with anything substantialy wrong with the site. About the only thing that might be nice would be a greater number of natural bodied models. That said they still have 144 models that are all natural.

*Kelly and her husband are amazing performers and they always seem to have great chemistry with the models. It may be talent or they pick models knowing that there'll be great chemistry.
Whatever the reason. Their scenes are always hot.

**To be avoided by anyone who doesn't want to see Kelly or her husband on screen because one or both of them is always in the video.***

- Part of the Porn Pros network, one of the more creative uses of reality porn.
- Has 42 sets overall, videos are near HD quality, but are a little grainy, I'm thinking for that "authentic amateur" feel.
- All 42 scenes are ones I will keep and really think this reality niche has been missed by most networks.
- Download speeds are very good with a DL manager, terrible without a DL manager.
- Has a good believability factor going for it. Even though you will probably know these models are porn stars, they do a good enough job of making it seem realistic to convince me with a little help from my imagination.
- Biggest pictures go up to 3000 long end, but some, keeping to that amateur theme are much smaller like a cellphone picture, 800 long end.
- Still updating, but the updates are now only once every two weeks, instead of weekly as they were in Duke's TBP review.
- All the models are cute, some stunners like Melanie Rios, quite a few Latinas on this site.

Cons:

- There are only 42 scenes. Of course, you get the network access to offset that, but really think Porn Pros has hit on a niche here that they should be really pushing.
- Some bad camera angles, could add more to the amateur feel, but bad camerawork is frustrating nonetheless.

Bottom Line:

I've seen these "hacked" sites for years, ex-girlfriend revenge, dorm room parties. While it's not really believable that someone hacked someone's social networking site and stole their near HD videos of hardcore sex, which wouldn't be allowed on those sites anyway, I think this one does a good job of making it just believable enough.

Though this site does follow a certain formula in the videos, it's one that we don't see much in porn these days. Every scene I've watched so far starts with the women clothed, trying on clothes, doing all the things us perverted men like to believe goes on, though the pillow fight goes a little far. They have been able to put models on this site that I could see doing these things. As the silliness, which is good in this case, slows, the girls start kissing and you get pretty much a lesbian scene, then a guy shows up and gets in on the fun.

The picture sets take this one further by having the girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror. Flashing each other, these create a real feeling of playfulness when looking at them. Maybe there's a deep concept going on here or maybe they just got lucky by filming it this way, but I did find these scenes to be as believable as any reality scenes in porn.

The bad camera angles are annoying, but I do think they add to the amateur feel of it.

Now, this site gave me fits without a DL manager, I actually downloaded one scene, the newest update, Veronica and Mandy, in all 3 formats, twice each and still didn't get a full download without it breaking. Nearly every scene had 404 file not found on download links through the browser. Once I used a download manager with username and password stored in it, everything downloaded fine and no 404 files.

The videos are an odd 1240x702 resolution, I don't mind that's it not exactly 720p. The selling point here are the pictures that create a realistic feel to the scenes. You're onto something here Porn Pros. The pictures probably have the first 10 minutes of the girls just coming home from a party or clubbing, changing clothes, being frisky with each other, then the video picks up with the action. I like it.

The photos in the mirrors also seem better than your standard, "pose this way" photos on porn sites, since the girls are being silly in them.

The action is generally very good. A few of the models that really shine here are Gigi Rivera, Melanie Rios and Tanner Mayes. Though my favorite scene has Lynn and Ella in it, the Latina one does some serious ride 'em cowboy on the guy. The site has a lot of personality to it.

Though small in size, I've been on sites that have 1,000 videos that I don't keep 42 scenes from, so I think this site was worthy of a review and is one of the reasons that I ended up liking the Porn Pros network.

All very good models, good, fun and original concept with younger, cute models. Can't beat that. Very nice site with a lot of network content to back it up!

Very unique style
games simulator is a good idea and very fun
cool profiles for both members and models
unscripted Videos
good interaction with customers
download speeds are very nice
you can now select the format for the videos so you can get smaller file sizes!
great forums

Cons:

no search option, only clickable tags
models directory needs work
scenes page needs some work

Bottom Line:

I HIGHLY recommend this website, as this is a very very unique style. I was excited to see the games are really unscripted and the cards have the models do very nice things.

- Part of the Mofo Network (10 sites in total on the network)
- Approximately 80 scenes
- Scenes are lengthy (most around an hour)
- Multiple download options (HD, SD and mobile)
- 2 levels of HD available 1080p and 720p)
- Streaming available
- Some amazing looking girls
- Better than average download speeds
- Discount through TBP
- Updates weekly
- Interesting mix of known porn girls and lesser-known models
- Photos available
- Download managers work
- Lots of fun to watch

Cons:

- As with most ‘party’ sites, most of the guys are annoying (but not as bad as with other sites)
- Hand-held camera can be a bit shaky in some scenes

Bottom Line:

It goes without saying, obviously, that a large part of satisfaction in a site is subjective. If a site does all the technical bits well, it isn’t going to matter too much if you just don’t like the theme of the site. So having stated that, I really like ‘party’ sites like these, and this is one of the better ones I’ve joined.

The site is probably big enough to be a decent value on its own, but it is part of a bigger network. This specific site has about 80 videos posted and each of those is about an hour long. Each of the scenes has a unique setup that is actually interesting to watch. I didn’t find myself constantly skipping ahead to the sex. There is a mix of indoor and outdoor video shoots, with the outdoor scenes usually being shot by a pool so there are lots of skimpy bikinis around. The first half of the video is taken up with the set-up and the second half is the sex.

The lighting is usually very good – the outdoor scenes aren’t washed out and the indoor scenes are mostly lit properly. The camera work is better than average for these kinds of sites. Adding to the professional look of the scenes is the fact that this obviously isn’t a group of self-centered guys who decided to make a porn site – the director always makes sure that the girls are the focus of the attention.

This site, and the Mofo network generally, have the technical bits right: all the scenes are available in three different sizes. The HD is available in 1080p and 720p (and they look great!), the SD video is available in MPEG4, MPEG and WMV. And there’s also an option for mobile users. I didn’t list this as a con above, but given the length of these videos the files sizes are huge. Some top out at over 5GB for the 1080p. There are photos available too, with zips as an option

Another possible issue for some people is that there is very little variation on the type of model in each scene. If your tastes are like mine this is no issue here because the overwhelming majority of the models are petite and young. I don’t think there are any black or ethnic models, and no one over 25 either. But if you’re a fan of models like Tanner Mayes and Micah Moore and girls who have that body type, you’ll certainly like the girls here.

This site alone is a good enough value to justify the membership, especially when you join through TBP/PU and get the discount. But there are nine other sites (including a MILF site and a gangbang site) that only increase the value of the membership. If you like watching petite young lasses party and enjoy themselves, then this is a site definitely worth checking out.

I've already reviewed this site earlier, and now came back to it again. In short - it is still a site with LOTS and LOTS of VERY unusual Japanese content (contests of 64 nude girls, topless gymnastics, parties where girls are getting nude and being fucked, and so on). Video quality is at best mediocre (I'd even say poor for 2011), plus there is pixelation over genitals (reportedly it is a law in Japan), but scenarios are so unusual, that it still may be worth the try.

What has changed since my last review:
- a LOT more content has been added, much appreciated
- it includes some full DVDs, also a good thing
- these DVDs are usually in MPEG1 or MPEG2 format, which is an insult in year 2011 (quality is poor while size is large).
- they have added full versions of the DVDs, so they can be downloaded in one piece
- as a side effect, navigation has became very confusing

Bottom line: the only thing which makes it worthwhile, is UNIQUE content, the rest (video quality and convenience of use) is poor to very poor. Still, as they're the only site (at least as far as I know) with this kind of content, it may be worth a try, especially for fans of Japanese porn.

- subtitles (better than nothing, but worse than English)
- download speeds could be better for the largest files

Bottom Line:

It is one of the best standalone sites I know, with a very original concept, both European and American girls, excellent locations and unbeatable video quality.

Site is built around the concept that they are gathering several models, generate game based on their preferences, and let them play without any scripts. In many cases it leads to a very natural conversations and emotions during the video, and these natural things are very difficult to find elsewhere.

As they say, actions are based on model preferences, and in practice vary from lesbian to anal, with a special emphasis on group actions.

Site uses girls both from US and Europe, which I like. What I do not like that when the girls are from Europe, they speak Hungarian and not English. For these games, site provides subtitles, but reading subtitles is not as natural as listening. They have some games with US girls, and in these games English is the language girls (and guys) are speaking. In forum, site has promised to reach 50-50 split between US and European games in 2011, but I think they are not there yet.

Site locations are second to none, even better than those of Brazzers. Overall variety is great.

Updates are regular, though it is difficult to understand the pattern. Within a month there are usually about 15 updates (out of these, two weeks there is an update every day, and other two weeks are without updates completely).

Video quality is absolute top from what I have ever seen on any adult site. 1920x1080 MP4 in 12MBit/s is their top format, and it is very difficult to beat.

Download speeds are ok (though not great), and sometimes are somewhat annoying for the largest files.

I think we need more sites like FuckingGamble, with original ideas, regular updates, excellent locations, and top video quality.

+ Attractive eastern European female models paired with groups of guys
+ some of the models are well known (and sought after)
+ exclusive content
+ high standard videos in three different resolutions and sizes (see bottom line) plus a flash-stream
+ downloadable photo content
+ access to five more websites of same quality
+ long videos, 50 to 90 minutes each
+ good download speeds, managers supported
+ updates are dated
+ content is searchable and can be ordered in many different ways

Cons:

- only 20 scenes
- only 1 to 2 updates per month
- model naming is erratic and generic
- some setups are iterative

Bottom Line:

... and here we go again, trying to review a single site that in fact is part of a site family (I am avoiding the term 'network' here because I do not consider 6 sites to qualify as a network) consisting of "Student sex parties", "My pickup girls", "Cash for sex tape", "Porn traveling", "Chicki Porn" and this site itself.

Each site of the family has a rather unique approach to its scenes, however, in the case of "Hard Fuck Tales" it's straightforward:
One girl, more than one guy, a more or less interesting setup and 50 to 90 minutes of hardcore sex per session.

Saying that, as a single site, Hard Fuck Tales would be mostly noted for spectacularly looking eastern European girls, many of which you have seen and noted before elsewhere and now that you see them again causing some confusion due to the creative naming of the models by the site's producers:

Take some generic russian girl's names, mix them with some anglo-american sounding names and count them up with numbers. WTF? The site's list of the 10 top rated models then reads accordingly: Sweet Tanata (ok, at least she is traceable under that name) leads over a Monica and an Ashley, closely followed by some Lenas, Ritas and Svetas.

Ok, so you can forget the naming and thus have to depend on some other ability to track down the girls elsewhere, but the models themselves really are of a high standard.
Same goes with the video sessions: There is some serious action going on here, most of the scenes contain anal and dp sex, all of them are worth the download.
In the end, you are almost relieved that there are only 20 of them to the date of the review. Although bear in mind that 20 scenes easily mean 15 to 24 hours of video (I did not make the exact calculation here although info about length and specs are given for each scene).

The content you get seems to be exclusive and is, as I pointed out, good quality.
As you would expext from a modern age porn site, you can chose between three different video resolutions: SD 1024x576 in AVI, HD 1280x720 in MKV and 460x320 in MOV. Even the lowest quality allows you to follow the action on a laptop or regular screen. File sizes vary accordingly between around 120 to 150 MB for the MOV's and up to 1.5 to 2.0 GB for the HD MKV's.
Download speeds of the movies are on par, download managers are supported.
In addition, you can view or preview the video content on a flash stream that works very responsive and in a good resolution.
The picture collectors also get satisfied with 150 to 200 unique photos per session (and not just screenshots), they can be dl'd as ZIP and are accessable through a gallery. Format is okay (1152p at the long side).

Bottom Line:
------------
A solid performance modern age porn website with a fair amount of high quality content. Attractive on its own, it becomes a highlight when considered part of a 6-site-family with sister sites of similar quality.

-Good amount of material with 56 very long parties that consist of multiple scenes
-Very attractive models
-Amateurish feeling with all out hardcore action
-High definition downloads with no limits or DRM on newer videos
-Includes membership to five other sites which are mostly good
-Multiple payment processors available

Cons:

-Sometimes the parties are way too long with no sex action going on
-The other side of the coin to the amateurism also affects this site. There are scenes with no sound, cell phone interference noise, wind blowing on the microphone, awkward camera work and just general messing around
-Download speed can be really bad at busy times but up to 5 mgeabytes per second at good times. Downloads limited to two at the time also preventing you browsing the site while they are on
-Background noise on the scenes, radio usually
-Not everyone at the party takes part in action

Bottom Line:

The theme of this site is very similar to HardFuckTales which I alos reviewed. While that site is dedicated to three on one scenes with not much fooling around going on, this one features bigger groups of people having sex and doing lots of other things too like playing ball, drinking, dancing and partying. These parties last easily three hours or more and total in 6-10 gigabytes at the best resolution. Along with MyPickupGirls this site is where the main amount of content on this network is.

Some of the parties are like films where there are multiple scenes between different participants while others have lots of fooling around and only one all sex clip. There are also often girls on the scene who don't take part in all of it that kind of reduces the overall feeling. They should just have models who do it all.

Models are all young Russian girls. Some are totally unknown while others are easily recognizeable from many subsites on 21Sextury for example. Here however they all go by some bogus names that are so generic that they often have numbers behind them. Girl you might know as Logan is Eva here and Ioana is Anya_7. I've seen the same names used to numbers well over 10. Are they trying to make following the production of these Russian girls this hard on purpose?

The sounds are the weak point of this site. The recording quality can be bad with cell phone interference or sounds can be missing from some scenes completely. Also some irritating background music on the indoors scenes. There's lots of talking and having fun which is all in Russian but they have included subtitles in English which is nice.

I recommend this site if one is into East European
and Russian porn. The other sites you get also are strongly focused on the same theme. Parties can be long and often deviate from the real action but this is as close as it gets to having some reality porn. Certainly beats having some big brother junk running on your TV.

-Very nice looking models that you haven't seen too many times already
-Genuinely amateurish feeling that fools you succesfully into thinking these are not professionals (which may actually be true)
-Long scenes. Never hurts unless you are short on storage space
-Image quality is surprisingly good for amateurish hand held stuff. I've seen worse lit big studio films
-Video download without DRM or limitations in either HD wmv or mkv files that are somewhere between HD and FullHD resolution
-Lots of photos downloadable in zips
-Large selection of payment processors. Pay attention to avoid the ones using regional billing

Cons:

-There are downsides to the amateurish feeling too. There's lots of messing around, failing and such that almost should be edited out. I understand that a DP for example isn't an easy thing to pull off but sometimes in these scenes they try for quite some time only to give up and try again later. Sometimes it's ok but sometimes it frustrates the viewer too
-In many indoors scenes they have radio blasting so you cannot hear anything but some dance music. Good thing these are subtitled as they'd speak Russian anyway
-Some awkward camera work where you feel like you are missing the action. It's usually handheld and often by the actors themselves
-Download speeds vary a lot. I've seen 5 megabytes per second sometimes but often it is well below 500 kilobytes per second. Also you have very limited connections as earlier review mentions. If you are downloading two clips, you won't be able to browse the site itself
-Some strange fade-ins to the very same scene and position

Bottom Line:

This is relatively new site with 17 scenes available so far. Updates have been regular once every two weeks. The theme of the site is the same three (usually) guys picking up a girl leading to group sex. There's some acting before the action starts but not too much. The girls are probably all Russian ones that you could categorize as teens. They have generic names (like Julia_3 and Olga_6) but you could find some of them on sites like AnalTeenAngels and CutiesGalore with the names they are better known as.

The content is deliberately amateurish and succeeds quite well. Sometimes too well. It appears it's all recorded and released as such even though there are some strange fade-ins where nothing changes but you can still notice them. Don't know why since they don't edit even obvious bloopers out (messy anal, anyone?). There's quite a lot of dialogue in Russian but fortunately they have subtitles too since even if you understood Russian, a lot of it would be lost in the radio blasting away right next to the camera.

Video is surprisingly good, especially in the outdoors scenes. There's also photographs available in good numbers and zipped.

All the girls look very good and the action is hard. There was maybe one scene where there WASN'T anal and dp.

The site itself comes as a part of a package of handfull of sites with similar amateur theme. In my opinion this site with StudentSexParties are the strong points of the deal. The score reflects my hopes of this site keeping on with the updates and the kind of content and quality we've seen so far. A very nice one to balance all the glamour stuff I've gotten used to.

Protecting MinorsWe are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.