McCain Finally Does The Right Thing. Still A Warmongering Sociopath.

" Legislator John McCain reduced the most recent Republican health-care plan early Friday early morning.

In a moment of high dramatization on the Us senate flooring, the Arizona senator, stricken with brain cancer cells and barrier against his celebration's secretive legislative handling, gave the definitive vote versus Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's proposal to partially rescind the Affordable Care Act. The amendment dropped, 51-49, thwarting once more the GOP's longstanding efforts to deliver on a main project pledge. Senators Susan Collins of Maine and also Lisa Murkowski of Alaska likewise elected against the expense, proceeding their resistance to the GOP's partial abolition effort. But it was McCain who surprised the Senate, breaking with his event after earlier assisting it on a vital procedural vote." *.

Read more here:.

Follow Jimmy Dore on Twitter:.

Follow Steve Oh on Twitter:.

Adhere to Malcolm Fleschner on Twitter:.

Jimmy Dore, Stef Zamorano, Steve Oh and Malcolm Fleschner on this week's Hostile Progressives. The group chats the health care ballot, Charlie Gard situation, DNC at Politicon and fracking. For more information most likely to.

FACT: Leftists hate free markets and capitalism because they are mostly weak beta males who can’t compete in any free system. That’s why they want the government to take money from productive people and give it to them for free. Yet they keep whining and blaming their general failure in life on successful people despite the fact that they are leeching on them for their existence. Ungrateful parasites!

Free market capitalism should not be allowed to play such a crucial role in whether or not people have access to life saving healthcare. The market is not a miracle solution to everything, and capitalism has kinda gone off the rails.

Why should he apologize to AJ ? he is a fat turd who deserves to be spit on… pizza gate, yogurt gate..birthers and so many right wing religious zealots point of view… so , i spit in their face also ya snowflake bitches

Ok, this title is super hyperbolic and disgusting. John McCain deserves so much more respect than to called a sociopath.

That aside, you’re acting like the affordable care act is the greatest bill to ever be passed, and is infallible in all it’s majesty. I’ve got some news for you, it’s a sham bill that does more to hurt the poor and underprivileged you pretend to care so much about. First off, what the bill set out to accomplish, getting rid of insurance providers ability to restrict access to people with preexisting conditions, was done so without any limitations on a company’s ability to price hike, resulting in an increase in premiums across the board, and the creation of insanely expensive tiers based on those preexisting conditions. Second, the individual mandate that requires people to buy into the health care system or incur a fine results in a punishment for the poor who can’t afford these premiums and earn too much for accss which hasn’t expanded to cover the gaps. Third, the employee mandate only applies to full time employees, resulting in employers skirting lines to keep employees at part time, while still working them as close to legally possible to full time. This results in, you guessed it, another hit to the lower class. So, what was so important in this bill that you demonize it at every turn, saying that no decent human being would vote for it…. ohh, it was repeals for the individual and employer mandates! Seriously!?

Ohh, and the video description is lifted directly from the first paragraph of the Atlantic article that they’re parroting throughout the video. Disgraceful.

I get the, “at least it’s progress,” argument, I really do. Change comes slow in politics, and we can’t expect everything all at once. That being said, this was a move that had republican support, and it was to remove two of the biggest issues with the bill, the mandate that punished the poor for not having insurance, and the mandate that required companies provide insurance options to their full time employees. It kept the important parts, like not having a restriction on preexisting conditions, and still, Jimmy insists that you wouldn’t vote for this if you were a decent human being.

Petronio39
Youre all over the place. The skinny bill is a giant tax cut……..
And it appears you dont know how the market for insurance works, or what the ACA did/does.
“Limitations on a companys ability to price hike”
What does this even mean? Why would a bill providing alternative insurance restrict other companies? And thats not the reason prices are going up. Previously, they were going up because without the mandate, healthy people would opt out of certain quotes or just get the minimum, or not get insurnace at all, requiring companies to raise prices on sick people. The ACA did two things, provided government funded insurance, and required a mandate for everyone. If someone goes to the emergency room, but doesent have insurance, the tax payer is footed the bill, every,single,time. Which is why the Medicaid expansion was so important. Meaning the repeal, would result in millions of poor people without insurance.
“Restrict access to people with pre-existing conditions”
No…..The bill was designed to provide an alternative to corporate healthcare, which has the ability to deny you for what they deem pre-existing. This is where where the greatest point of contention on the healthcare battle battle. Because people are flocking to the aca, companies are forced to pull out of certain states because they cant compete.
“Skirting the lines”
What? What employers are skirting the lines? You only have to provide insurance if you have 50 employees or more, and working 30 hours or more a week. Thats six hours for 5 days. That’s nothing lol. For those who cant afford insurance, can have Medicaid, hence the expansion, or stay on their parents insurnace until they’re 26 (which would have been removed aswell). You have no idea what youre talking about friend. The skinny repeal would have been disastrous, And inflated the market, because everyone who thinks they dont need it, would pull out. Raising prices on everyone else

This title is straight up disrespectful to a true patriot, hero, and one of the greatest politicians of the modern era. Part of why I hate Jimmy Dore. Just are screeching fool who makes videos which have no regard for facts.

WTH? You didn’t even MENTION what HE actually said about why he voted the way he did! He’s a parliamentarian of 30 years. When he voted to proceed to debate, he banged his fist saying that he wouldn’t vote for the bill the way it was… and that’s what he did. It’s the procedural vote that was not part of regular order, and he wants to return to regular order where bills get debated. The Republicans insisted on voting rather than debating, and he voted it down. He gave a whole speech about why he was voting the way he was, and you guys DIDN’T EVEN MENTION IT. Fail.

Cenk has sympathy for Islamic terrorism, it influences his entire world view, perception and political philosophies and he loves time and time again to chastize the Western World for their “unloving treatment of the poor.”

Hillary Clinton is every bit as much of a warmonger and then some, and TYT supported her over the relatively less-interventionist Trump. I guess identity politics, tranny bathrooms, and Obamacare are more important to them than saving millions of lives.

+Ryan Green
Saying we should take out the families of ISIS does not mean he wants to do more wars for regime change in Iraq or the rest of the middle east. Hillary and Trump both support drone strikes, so there is very little difference between them on that. *The only difference is which one supports wars for regime change. Hillary Clinton supported that in Iraq, and she had a long record of supporting that throughout her career. Trump had a long record of criticizing the war in Iraq even while Bush was still president.* The choice was clear: Trump was the candidate who advocated fewer wars for regime change in the middle east.

Inspire to kill cops!? How!? He’s merely exposing a flawed police culture. Its police inspiring each other to kill willy nilly! If you want to talk about inspiring to kill, look no further than Trump, who encourages police brutality not to mention inspiring a white man to kill white men who were defending Muslim women. You cant control everything in life young man.

1. *A corporation is fundamentally a collection of people who share the common interest of turning a profit, so they are “people” by definition* . If they weren’t people then why would they be deserving of any rights enumerated in the constitution? The left’s line of argumentation on this issue is plain stupid.

2. *Money can be a form of speech because both work in the same way in the realm of politics and interest* . If I wanted a candidate to win because of their policy positions I would not make a formal declaration, I would use expression to do so in the form of money.

Well, that’s just a point of contention for us, because I see the world differently. A lot of what “power” is is derived from money; this is a postulate of *Any* society, so i will treat money as a form of power in the next few lines. In a society, discrepancies in power/money is what people chose to strive for everyday. We go to school or learn a skill partly so we can have more money/power than other people. This desire for money/power is what makes capitalist societies so beautiful because people who are more competent will gain more power. It is perfectly fair in my view that someone who strives for more and demonstrates exceptional skill have more power/money than someone who wants to watch tv and idle the way away. It is misleading that campaign contributions are always given with the intent of some sort of a return which is why you cannot outline them completely. In fact someone with a lot of influence giving publicity to a candidate would be better than money in many ways. if we are talking about donations that are given with the expectation of some sort of kickback, then we agree, but those should be dealt with on a case by case basis because money is speech and cannot be ruled out.