If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You mean an attempt at making a new game rather than a re-release of one you probably already have. (generic you, I am assuming Atari skips over the 3rd games) It's not that bad compared to what gamefreak normally does.

I didn't want a re-release, I wanted either Pokemon Gray or sixth gen games. Also, what are you talking about generic Atari and third games? ?_?

I didn't want a re-release, I wanted either Pokemon Gray or sixth gen games. Also, what are you talking about generic Atari and third games? ?_?

I am going to rephrase it, since my post doesn't appear as clear as I thought it was.

Releasing Pokemon Black and White 2 seems to be a little better than Pokemon Gray. Since the former is an attempt at a new game, rather than just being Black and White with a few upgrades. At least from my perspective, you can feel free to disagree.

Originally Posted by Phlogiston

Since the games seem to be getting increasingly... bloated, I read you loud and clear on this one.

I never used the pokewalker, dreamworld or most of the other extra features they keep adding. Neither do I trade/communicate/battle with other players, or try to catch them all. A lot of time it just seems to require more effort than it is worth.

I am going to rephrase it, since my post doesn't appear as clear as I thought it was.

Releasing Pokemon Black and White 2 seems to be a little better than Pokemon Gray. Since the former is an attempt at a new game, rather than just being Black and White with a few upgrades. At least from my perspective, you can feel free to disagree.

They could have made Gray a sequel to a degree, I would have been fine with that. Usually I look forward to the third games (I understand what you meant now haha) because of the upgrades and neat plot additives (think Platinum's Distortion World). The fact that Game Freak decided to give both B&W a sequel and slapped a '2' on the cover kind of made me a little butthurt (so I didn't purchase either one).

Little Miss Stalinist/Secret Al-Qaeda agents (i.e. Ellie) would be a ***** even if she was a conserative republican. What makes her the way she is happens to be the fact that the webmaster of this site let's her behave like this. (Of course, I would never make a liberal a staff member at any forum I'd be in charge of, regardless.)

Little Miss Stalinist/Secret Al-Qaeda agents (i.e. Ellie) would be a ***** even if she was a conserative republican. What makes her the way she is happens to be the fact that the webmaster of this site let's her behave like this. (Of course, I would never make a liberal a staff member at any forum I'd be in charge of, regardless.)

Wait, people get flamed for not buying a video game? God damn when did nerds become stereotypical 80's movie jocks?

If I may say so, You'll get flamed for almost anything in anything. Though I honestly didn't notice any flaming here. lol

Originally Posted by Zazie

Not sure, but I have noticed being a nerd/geek/whatever seems to be very much built on peer pressure. Not just on the internet but also in real life.

Originally it is. (And will continue to be if you live in a bad area.) However eventually you get over it and learn not to mostly care. :P I just happen to find things on the internet easier then real life. Arguing/Discussing in real life is so annoying...Yet I guess theres pro's and cons to both.
besides, even being a nerd is technically subjective just like calling something cliche is (in my opinion of course.). Very few percentages are nerds...most just like things.