i voted for isiah mostly because he sucks as a gm and seems to be a bit of a douchebag. that may not be fair, but whatever... also, i'm wondering if i should be thankful to isiah for making the knicks terrible and thus the atlantic less competitive...

see here is where it gets interesting as we start to look at guys who can't be judged by the same criteria due to their respective roles.

Isiah gets my vote and here's why:

He commited to this team as the GM. With that comes bigtime responsibility in which he was thee man behind the whole team. He was the leader - the boss. Hence his turning his back on the team (while his motives may be murky) to me is worse than what Alonzo did.

I said it before, and i'm sticking with it... Isiah was instrumental in getting a franchise here in Toronto.
regardless of what he did afterwards, he played a big role in getting us a team and that deserves something.
i wont vote for him... never.

Honestly I think Isaiah has already been bashed enough times. After what New York did to him, I think he deserves somewhat of a break. Zo on the other hand is a clown. He puts an act out there in front of the tv as someone he's not. My vote goes to Zo.

Ugh, you guys are killing me ZO WAS NEVER COMING, EVER! OUR GUYS NEW IT, AND HE KNEW IT. HE WAS THERE TO MAKE MONEY WORK AND SAVE THE TEAM 15 MILLION

WTF we were over this in round one. Do you guys think I post this stuff for fun?

AHHHHHHHHHHHHH :facepalm:

You're right. Based on the stuff Jackson cited to support your position, it appears as though Mourning didn't do anything wrong. But blame Babcock for contributing to all the confusion. In the quotes I found, Babcock was not upfront about the ZERO possibility of Mourning playing for Toronto. Babcock's remarks paved the ground for Mourning backing out, but also suggested the Raps wanted Mourning and that he might play for Toronto.