U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’

Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying ‘the idea is approved by Washington’
Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was ‘totally unacceptable’

Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

War games: An explosion in the Syrian city of Homs last month. It has been now been suggested that the U.S. backed the use of chemical weapons to spur international military intervention

War games: An explosion in the Syrian city of Homs last month. It has been now been suggested that the U.S. backed the use of chemical weapons to spur international military intervention

According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.

It reads: “Phil… We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
‘We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
‘They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record….”………..

Lyndon LaRouche characterized the military strike by the United States against Syria as a British coup in progress against the President of the United States which must be met by the American population stamping out all British imperial influences in the United States.In reviewing the Syria bombing ordered by President Donald J. Trump yesterday, Lyndon and Helga LaRouche condemned it in the strongest terms possible. President Trump received a fraudulent briefing on the event itself—asserting that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for a chemical weapons attack on his own population – despite the fact that U.S. military forces on the ground in Syria knew that the chemicals came from an Al-Qaeda base, as stated by Russia and Syria. President Trump was lied to by individuals in his national security/intelligence chain of command. The sources utilized to claim Syrian culpability for the attack are exclusively British, the same people who are coordinating the international attack on Trump’s Presidency, in an effort to destroy any positive potential for relationships with Russia and China to rebuild the U.S. and world economy. This was a violation of international law. Trump was setup. “The British set this in motion against the entire human race,” Lyndon LaRouche emphasized.

LaRouche said the Trump must immediately seek out those responsible for the fraud and fire them. A United Nations investigation of the incident must occur immediately. Following both, a war crimes prosecution would be appropriate. The President should never listen to the British. It is not accidental that this setup occurred right when the President was meeting with China’s President Xi Jinping—a meeting which has the British and their Wall Street allies completely apoplectic—a meeting which could portend a new and peaceful paradigm for economic and scientific progress.

Foreign and Expatriates Ministry sent on Tuesday two identical letters to UN secretary General and President of Security Council saying that the French warplanes, working within the so-called “international coalition” led by the US, perpetrated an unjust massacre on the territories of Syria near the Syrian-Turkish borders, targeting Toukhan al-Kubra village to the north of Manbij, killing families in complete and demolishing houses there.

“The French unjust aggression claimed the lives of more than 120 civilians, most of them are children, women and elderly, in addition to tens of wounded citizens, the majority of them are also children and women as reports say that the fate of scores of other civilians who still under debris are unknown too,” the Ministry said in the letters.

It went on to say that the US, French, Turkish, Saudi Arabian, British and Qatari continued support to the terrorist organizations that they name “moderate groups, like Jabhat al-Nusra, Jaish al-Fatah, Jaish al-Islam, Liwa al-Tawhid and other terrorist organizations affiliated to the ISIS and al-Qaeda is a clear evidence that these states are colluding and cooperating with the terrorist groups, and an indication to their non-seriousness in combating terrorism.

“The Syrian government affirms that those massacres, crimes and destruction will not deter Syria from continuing its duties in combating terrorism and working to realize a political solution to the crisis in Syria through a Syrian-Syrian dialogue, led by Syria and without any foreign intervention,” the Ministry said.

The final print edition of Britain’s “progressive”, “pro-democracy” newspaper “The Independent” has been published on March 26th, 2016.

It is worth remembering that with the launch of NATO’s genocidal wars on Libya and Syria in 2011, the long-discredited “anti-war” facade of “The Independent” had totally collapsed; despite the highly deceptive propaganda rhetoric of its gatekeeper “journalists” such as Robert Fisk.

The front pages of “The Independent” compiled below illustrate the more blatant strand of its 5-year-long virulent, appalling anti-Syria propaganda.

The UK government have published possibly the most hair-brained and contradictory mendacious pretext yet to try and invade Syria, by claiming it would be in ‘defense’ of errr…90km of Turkey’s southern border with Syria.

The UK have no military mandate to ‘protect’ Turkey’s southern border with Syria, let alone by illegally invading Syria, while pointedly not wanting to secure Europe’s external border with Turkey.

In practice all the military ‘manoeuvering’ and war propaganda in the US-led Genocidal war on Syria, has only ever been about trying to secure military ‘leverage’ in administrative elections in Syria.

The falsity of the US-led coalition was always obvious given the inclusion of the unelected likes of the Saudis & Qataris.

UPDATE:

The UK NATO war propaganda for the simple-minded that defies all logic and law has nevertheless had to admit that the Syrian army has advanced to protect it’s border from a NATO invasion by the US, UK & Turkey.

This is the very same allegedly all seeing big brother super-sized NATO that would have everyone believe it did not have a single helicopter in the air, to track an alleged errr…terrorist in a BMW in Brussels.

Syria took a scathing swipe at Britain on Sunday over the British position on Syria and the latest statements made by its Foreign Secretary, condemning Britain’s “political hypocrisy”.

In two letters it addressed to the UN Secretary General and Chairman of the Security Council, Foreign and Expatriates Ministry dismissed the escalation in the “brazen” attitude of some British officials on the situation in Syria, including those of the Foreign Office.

The British government, they said, has no right to peach to others about democracy, human rights and combating terrorism when it itself has employed all its capabilities and brought into play its “colonialist experience” in providing all forms of support, including financially, militarily, politically and media-wise, to the terrorist organizations in Syria.

The fact that the British government has sent terrorists and extremists to Syria, such as its national “John, the ISIS Slaughterer”, and harbored over tens of years others like Abu Qatada and Omar Abdel-Rahman reveals Britain’s “political hypocrisy and the falseness of its claims about promoting democracy, fighting terrorism and protecting human rights,” according to the letters.

NATO states could not conduct illegal wars without their bought and paid for corporate propagandists committing the criminal act of publishing war propaganda with the specific purpose of causing the murder of civilians for financial profit.

In fact what is not properly publicly declared is that many ‘journalists’ are actually employed by the British government through (zero) intelligence services, as a means to try and give the British government (il)legal cover by pretending they did not deliberately mislead the public themselves.

This is to notify the Independent that they reasonably know they are committing a criminal offence by inciting the murder of civilians through the use of war propaganda that supports a US, UK & Turkish invasion of Syria.

On August 2, Britain’s Sunday Express newspaper headlined “SAS dress as ISIS fighters in undercover war on jihadis,” saying:

“More than 120 members belonging to the elite regiment are currently in the war-torn country” covertly “dressed in black and flying ISIS flags,” engaged in what’s called Operation Shader – attacking Syrian targets on the pretext of combatting ISIS.

UK SAS forces are in Saudi Arabia training anti-Assad terrorists along with US operatives doing the same thing – including in Turkey, Jordan, Qatar and perhaps Israel.

US and UK claims about training so-called “moderate” rebels reflect smoke-screen cover for working directly with ISIS terrorists – trained, armed and funded abroad, funneled cross-border into Syria to fight Assad, now with US/UK and Canadian air support along with covert commandos on the ground.

The British Parliament has been exposed trying to very quietly try and block legal challenges to their waging war on Syria.

The facts are the ‘Defence’ Secretary Michael Fallon dishonestly asserted off the Parliamentary record at the RUSI that he had legal grounds to use the false pretext of ‘surveillance’ to wage war in Syria without any vote, while the Tory & Labour MP’s David Davis and Tom Watson dishonestly portrayed their court order could stop legal challenges to ‘surveillance’ operations until the end of March 2016.

the entire apparatus of the british parliament and mainstream media are working together to try and avoid any legal challenge that can only expose the UK will never have any legal grounds to invade syria

Fallon, Davis and Watson were all acting on behalf of the entire British Parliament.

British ‘surveillance’ would realize they were rumbled with the three words…International Criminal Court.

Indeed why would any civilian wait for the British Parliament to go any further when no legal grounds of any kind have been produced for what is intended to be a British invasion of Syria?

So the war criminal Lord Ken MacDonald who Chairs ‘Reprieve’ (who really run interference over British government mercenaries like Begg, Belhaj & Co) then pretended today that Reprieve had filed an FOI request that ‘revealed’ the British government had already deployed the British military in Syria on bombing raids.

The British government peculiarly recently ‘announced’ in the ‘media’ not in the British Parliament, which was by no co-incidence shut down for ‘elections’ that day that British soldiers were going to try to ‘train’ what would really become a NATO ground invasion force for Syria launched from Turkey.

We asked the obvious question (in writing) to which there has inevitably yet been no legal written response from the British government, over what legal grounds there are to train what in legal terms are terrorists in Turkey, who the British government could not train in Britain… … …

… … …The plotting includes trying to put greater pressure on President Assad in Damascus (via Yarmouk, which should largely fail) while ridiculously trying to pretend a de-facto ‘government’ of white-washed terrorists can set up ‘state’ in Idlib to call for help from NATO… … …

… … … The simultaneous pronouncements that the US and Turkey are putting their overt terrorist ‘training’ scheme ‘on hold’ until May while Turkish ‘intelligence’ wants to blame any terror attacks on the Syrian government only proves that the European arm of NATO don’t have any legal grounds to be involved in the launch of any illegal ground invasion of Syria from Turkey.

It is obvious that Turkey blaming the Syrian government for any false flag terror attacks which is a very hard sell, is only designed to try and find a false pretext for the European arm of NATO to join a US & Turkish ground invasion of Syria… … …

In amongst the legal ducking and diving of NATO all over the place over their undeclared War on Syria, the legal grounds of one administrative authority (the UK in the EU) transferring military power for use to/under the control of a second country (Turkey) to militarily affect a third country (Syria) without their consent, remains non-existent.

The central issue of importance is that the UK (and for that read EU) incredibly wants to train ‘Syrian’ terrorists who unlike the British military will act completely outside any pretence of legal accountability in any British or European court of law.

According to The Daily Mail, Emwazi claimed the “MI5 knew ‘everything about me; where I lived, what I did, and the people I hanged around with’ and claimed the organization attempted to ‘turn’ him to work for them.”

In the late 1990s British intelligence recruited, groomed and protected a number of terrorist figures, including Abu Qatada. The radical imam told MI5 agents he exercised “powerful, spiritual influence over the Algerian community in London,” said he would look after the interests of the British state, and “would not bite the hand that fed him.”

An area of Syria is so heavily populated with British-born Jihadi fighters that it has been nicknamed ‘Little London’, according to a former hostage and aid worker.

Ahmed Walid Rashidi, a Danish aid worker, was one of the lucky few to be released by the Islamic State after being held captive for a month. He told the Sunday Times that the majority of foreign fighters have British or German accents. The town of Manbij in northern Syria was like a “little London or a little Berlin”.

“Many of these areas inhabited with ISIS in the north of Syria have a large foreign population which has taken the original Syrians out of the picture and created a new society”, says Danni Maki. “There are up to 8,000 families who have moved from the West to Raqqa which has made a huge change on the dynamics on the area. It’s a reality in northern Syria unfortunately.

‘Little London’, the area claimed to be heavily populated with British Jihadis, is not far away from the border with Turkey, which according to Maki is why it is popular with European fighters. He says it’s no surprise the area is home to the majority of English speaking foreign Jihadis.

Even more dangerous is that 250 of these extremists have already returned.

A British female terrorist has claimed the ISIL sent a lawyer to secure her release from a Turkish prison so she could join the terror group in Syria.

Umm Khattab al-Britaniyya claims she was rescued by an ISIL lawyer. Eighteen-year-old Umm Khattab al-Britaniyya describes in her blog how ISIL commanders arranged for a lawyer to come to the prison and persuade the Turkish authorities to free her and two other female fighters.

She said the lawyer ‘worked some magic’ after they were arrested near the Turkish border and jailed.

Unnamed Yazidi mother said that although she made it safely to her refugee camp, it was not before ISIL got a hold of much of the rest of her family, whom she has not heard from since.

Although the mother does not know of the status of the rest of her family, she does know, from first-hand experience, about the cruel nature of ISIL’ operations and their barbaric treatment of children and babies.

“ISIL are crazy people. They even cut the throats of the babies,” the mother asserted. “They want us, the Yazidis, to convert to (what they call) Islam, but we refuse. As long as we are not in their hands, we survive. We prefer to die instead of being their slaves.”

All the US & EU war propaganda is written in the language of the white supremacist racist European colonialist who in one way or another is making what is the untenable claim that the Genocidal US & EU governments war on Syria is to ‘save’ Syrian civilians.

In fact there are no -legal grounds- to use force to overthrow the Syrian government.

In legal terms the US & EU ‘governments’ therefore have no -legal grounds- to provide weapons and other support that a reasonable person knows has created the phoney Syrian ‘Opposition’ who fly under numerous banners, whose only purpose is to illegally overthrow the Syrian government.

It is very simple and straightforward that you are either for or against the criminality of the legal nihilism of what are Genocidal US & EU ‘governments’ or you are not.

(Brian Haw.TV) ~ The Genocidal British government need a ‘professional’…‘Terror’ Tsar to try to conceal their own long continuing Genocide in the Middle East, which really does brutally slaughter millions of innocent civilians.

George Soros recruited a ‘journalist’ to play ‘Professor’ to try to keep propping up the terror propaganda by peddling some very dangerous lies, through universities and ‘news’ media that essentially amount to a quite criminal ‘social experiment’.

(Brian Haw .TV) ~ The British government albeit illegally rely on continuing UN ‘resolutions’ on Iraq to illegally be in Iraq, (which we already have groundbreaking High Court legal proceedings against the British government in the UK over) while there are no legal grounds etc for their latest proposed military mission in Syria.

The fact there may be British hostages in Syria does not, as one ‘news’ source claims provide the necessary legal grounds, for the claim there ‘will be authorization’ (which is not in any event the same as fully disclosing an actual written authorization’ for) British military to enter Syria.

It is clear that ‘hostages’ voluntarily chose to enter what they knew was a war zone in Syria, that they knew the British government and military did not have any legal authority to act in.

NOTICE TO READERS

These infos are not intended to be shocking or to glorify violence in any way. These articles/images/videos are for educational purposes only, for documenting and try to explain the backdrop of a historical ruthless and bloody war, whose characteristics and details are routinely distorted and smothered by the dominant media.