Some booksellers, we report today, are refusing to display Into the River by Ted Dawe, which took top prize in the recent New Zealand Post Children's Book Awards. One explained that it was "unnecessarily graphic" and contained themes the bookseller considered inappropriate for young teenagers.

It contains obscenities and shock references that worthwhile literature does not need. We can only wonder what the judges were thinking, or how much worse the other entries could have been.

It's could be torn from the headlines. Historical abuse scandal! Catholic priest exposes impressionable twelve year old boys to a squalid pit of gang brawls, stalking, underage sex, glamourized drug use and general juvenile delinquency climaxing in a teen suicide pact gone horribly wrong! (There was even some swears and fanny jokes, if you had the patience to parse the footnotes. You'd be surprised how many did.)

If you're slightly more literate than the editorial board of the HoS, you've figured out I'm talking about Romeo and Juliet. Father Telford has my gratitude, and teachers like him deserve all our thanks not the condescension of a second-rate tabloid.

Still, how could you argue with this?

It is often remarked that New Zealand fiction written for film and television is oddly and uncharacteristically dark. There is not much that is bright, stylish or subtle in its treatment of most subjects, especially sex.

That is probably a reflection of the immaturity and limitations of screen writers in a small nation's talent pool, but our literature has been better than that. And our writing for children has been exceptionally good. Novelists should not let the crude depictions of New Zealand on air wash back into its literature, particularly when writing for the young.

It is not prudish or patronising to maintain a certain standard, it is re-assuring [teenagers] that quality exists and people they respect can recognise it. For many, their early teenage years might be the last in their lives when they read literature worthy of the name.

Quite easily, as it turns out. It is prudish, patronising - as well as more than a little hypocritical from the bully pulpit of a tabloid newspaper - to assume that teenage boys can't intelligently process crude language or depictions of sex and violence without transforming into ultraviolent droogs. (It also shows a eye-watering degree of cultural illiteracy well beyond the printed page, but let that pass for the time being.)

Editor/author Emma Neale makes this point, in an excellent post you really should read. (Emma also has an advantage in having read the book in question. More than once, even.)

I strongly believe that literature is one of the places that young people can safely think through situations, and rehearse their moral choices, without the grave personal compromise that living through the real events might involve. Forewarned is forearmed.The novel is aimed at ages 15+: the sex scenes are unromanticised, and speak the truth of unsatisfactory experiences. Yes, they’re awkward, raw, discomfiting. That’s part of the point.

But it's also an equally valid point for "worthwhile literature" without any rude words or explicit sex. One of the least remarked ironies of the editorial was it saw print a few days before the first anniversary of Margaret Mahy's death. Mahy did "bright, stylish and subtle" like nobody's business, but she also wrote a string of remarkable YA novels. I hope nobody tells The Herald that her (much under-rated) 1985 YA novel The Catalogue of the Universe contains a startling chapter where a teenage girl recounts almost being raped. They might also just want to avoid The Tricksters (1986) entirely, because Mahy certainly opened my eyes to the notion that teenage girls also think about sex, or at least the possibility of it, and find it terribly messy and confusing. And cringe-inducingly funny. And sometimes even as bright and stylish as the hem of a summer skirt fluttering in a warm breeze.

To say both novels were shocking, in the best sense of the word, to a teenage gay boy at a single-sex boarding school was a considerable understatement. So were Maurice Gee's "children's novels" -- particularly the Halfmen of O trilogy, which also appeared in the mid-80's to this SF/fantasy geek's whole hearted approval -- which worried away at the ambiguities and tensions of Godzone with all the spirited moral ferocity as his adult novels. And not without controversy either: "sordid" is an adjective that has hung around Gee his entire career, no matter who his intended audience is.

The Herald on Sunday may have as little faith in the discernment of teenagers as I have in that organ's literary judgement, but that's no reason why anyone else has to follow suit. Just makes sure to brush up on your Shakespeare, and the keep the latest front page atrocity on the Sunday newspapers away from the kids.

There's an old Irish joke that says that God invented sex as a joke. When nobody laughed, He made it a sin.

I've just re-read my comment on Emma's thread

I have a teacher friend who teaches at a fairly deprived school in Scotland. When you have a bunch of 14-15 year old boys in your class refusing to read the set text because one of the main characters is 'a fucking paedo', then you don't really have a choice except to open the discussion.

Realised on re-reading that it's not exactly clear that it was 'Romeo and Juliet' that I was alluding to as the set text in question.

I almost wished I'd bought the thing occasionally so that I could stop. But I prefer a softer lavatory experience, so have never bothered. I did respect the integrity they demonstrated by at least presenting as a tabloid from the start...

I think it's best just to recognise that it's only crumbling boomers and older who look at these things, and the organ has to to pander to its audience just like Fox and The Daily Mail. It doesn't make it real.

More kids will read it precisely because of this flurry of interest from the old farts. I think that is the outcome to dwell upon.

To say both novels were shocking, in the best sense of the word, to a teenage gay boy at a single-sex boarding school was a considerable understatement. So were Maurice Gee’s “children’s novels” – particularly the Halfmen of O trilogy, which also appeared in the mid-80’s to this SF/fantasy geek’s whole hearted approval – which worried away at the ambiguities and tensions of Godzone with all the spirited moral ferocity as his adult novels. And not without controversy either: “sordid” is an adjective that has hung around Gee his entire career, no matter who his intended audience is.

Maurice Gee is my favourite NZ novellist precisely because of those qualities- his best work doesn't spare anyone, and really gets something about how petty little squabbles between families that can affect subsequent generations (and even whole societies) if aggravated. I love how spare and controlled his prose- I'm a fan of writers who can be eloquent while also cutting right to the quick. He's also one of the nicest people I've ever interviewed, which only reiterates that you don't have to live like your own art.

I remember similar controversy over Maurice Gee's The Fat Man winning children's book of the year. Granted, it's gothic as hell and some of its material is decidedly grotesque (particularly Gee's lyrical descriptions of the titular character), but the complaints ignored what a human work it was.

As for the latest controversy over "Into the River"- I'd argue novels like that deal with those topics are absolutely necessary. Adolescents like being challenged- and they should be, too.

I predict that the next big controversy will be books that are perceived to egg on the nation's youths to subvert the powers that be. The Sex Pistols and The Clash managed to pull it off in 1970s Britain - who'd be the Johnny Rotten/Joe Strummer of literature?

I couldn't give a rat's ass about the hoopla over the book, but I do feel for the guy and his personal tragedy. Also, if I'm going to read something, or have the children read it, I'd just as soon it was born of genuine life experiences than some vampire fantasy. Although I'm not about to restrict them on that front either.

Ted Dawe was my english teacher for several years at Dilworth School in Epsom, one of his sources for life at boarding school (he certainly would have had some rich material from that environment.)

He was a superb English teacher that inspired a real love of literature in me, but also devilishly funny and a breath of fresh air in the stuffy atmosphere that could pervade my alma mater. I thoroughly enjoyed Thunder Road, so I suspect I’ll have to go out and buy this. Thank God I’m too old to be easily corrupted anymore :)

There's no lack of YA-lit contenders out there, Melvin Burgess has been doing a pretty good job for around two decades now. If they got out more, Family First would probably have kittens - or more properly puppies - over his hilariously great Lady: My Life as a Bitch, which lives up to its title in every sense.