@lorenzoens
You can't discuss with Apple-Fanboys about Apple-Products. It is senseles.

You can say something doesn't work unless someone has actually seen that it doesn't work. Nobody has reported on how the iPad 3 screen is in sunlight. So why go on about it until after there is at least one reliable report?

You can say something doesn't work unless someone has actually seen that it doesn't work. Nobody has reported on how the iPad 3 screen is in sunlight. So why go on about it until after there is at least one reliable report?

Surprised no-one else has pointed this out, but in the same vein:
In the iPad 2 vs 3 iBooks comparison, the 'screenshot' on the left is not actually an iPad 1/2 iBooks image, it is a simulation based on scaling down the iPad 3 image.

I'm not sure that's the case (look at the bookmark symbol), but even if it were, why does it matter, as long as it's an accurate representation of the difference? (which IMO it is)

Well, I took a few minutes to watch this review. It wasn't made by Apple themselves, but it sounds like it.

As for the display itself, the video shows images/footage from Apple of the pad being used on the beach in bright daylight. Although the reviewer is holding one as she speaks, she is indoors. There is no review of the display in the daylight.

If it is as easily viewable as the pictures imply, it will be a big step forward. Of course I have my doubts but I will believe it when I see it, and good for Apple and users if it does.

Even if the display is easily viewable in bright daylight, e-ink displays will still have the advantages of vastly superior battery life and reduced eyestrain.

It is the bookmark symbol that gives it away.
On an iPad 1 the bookmark has distinct horizontal lines, not the uniform grey that the example 'screenshot' has.

You didn't address my main point though. If the comparison accurately reflects the difference, why does it matter? I believe it to be a very accurate way of representing the real difference that the user will experience, so what's the problem?

You didn't address my main point though. If the comparison accurately reflects the difference, why does it matter? I believe it to be a very accurate way of representing the real difference that the user will experience, so what's the problem?

Shrug.
Do I think it is huge deal? No,
Do I think it is misleading, yes. I think it is clearly implied that these are screenshots of an iPad 2 and 3 for comparison, and they aren't.
It is, in the language of the title of the thread, a 'fake' screenshot.

Edit: It is also a little odd. They clearly have the ability to create real comparison screens, so why didn't they?

We see a guy enjoying the incredibly crisp images of his new beautiful iGadget, on the beach, taking phot...Wait, what?! On the beach? In reality that display would be hardly readable, it'd appear from dark as coffee to almost unusable.

While I don't think an LCD screen will be that clear under direct sunlight, I do believe there was some mention in the keynote that the new iPad would have wider viewing angles, higher saturation and will fare better under the sun compared to the iPad 2. How much better? We'll know on Friday.