This blog addresses the fatal flaw at the core of capitalism as a system of human psycho-socio-political-economic collective self-reproduction, a flaw which ultimately renders it a self-DIS-organizing, self-destroying system -- as is becoming increasingly evident. It also details the successor system to capitalism, the new system that represents the higher, positive way forward for humanity: Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, or EQUITISM.

Sunday, May 17, 2015

‘The Law of the Tendency of the Human-Social Forces of
Production to Rise’.

Dear Readers,

From time to time, I like to
share with you some of the gems of insight that leap from out of the
'''multilogues''', among Karl Seldon and other members of the Foundation, and from the transcribed
versions, published internally, including of those '''multilogues''' in which I
did not happen to participate, when and if those [edited] transcripts are
cleared for public sharing by the Foundation's General Council.

Here's an excerpt from the transcript of a recent orientation presentation, by
Karl Seldon, for new recruits --

[Karl Seldon]:

“Throughout '''human prehistory''', in Marx's sense, that is
to say, all the way from ‘anthropopoiesis’ until the formation of the successor
system to the presently-predominant, capital-relation-based global social
formation -- i.e., until the formation of the predicted system that we call ‘political-ECONOMICDEMOCRACY’, or ‘‘‘Equitism’’’ -- the human-social forces
of production tend to grow, to rise, although
unconsciously so, in terms of any of the deliberate motives of the human beings
who conduct this growth; unintentionally on their parts,
but rising nonetheless, and spawning a whole series of new social relations of
production ‘socio-ontologies’ -- the slave-relation, the serfdom-relation, the
barterable-commodity-relation, the money-relation, the capital-/wage-labor-relation,
and the predicted next, generalized-equity-relation
-- in the process, so that the social forces of production grow through a whole
series of critical quantitative thresholds for qualitative change; a whole
series of human-social ‘metafinite singularities’; of revolutions in
human-social self-productivity, in social ontology, and, fundamentally, in
social-relations[-of-production] ‘ideo-physio-ontology’. ...”