Wednesday, May 18, 2016

As expected, the left laid it on thick Monday at a federal trial on Wisconsin’s voter identification law.

Contrary to actual experiences on the ground during last month’s full-scale rollout of the law, an attorney for two liberal groups described voter ID as “torturous” for college students and minorities.

The law itself and Wisconsin taxpayers have been tortured by a spate of left-wing lawsuits that go on and on despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection last year of a challenge to the 2011 law requiring voters show photo ID in order to cast election ballots.

Assistant state Attorney General Clay Kawski, who is defending the state from yet another lawsuit, said voter ID opponents have thrown in everything but the kitchen sink in trying to kill the law. He called it a “scattershot approach,” according to the Associated Press.

In their latest lawsuit, the left’s attorney dragged out a Todd Allbaugh, who served as chief of staff for former state Sen. Dale Schultz. Schultz, a Richland Center Republican, was seen as a turncoat by many conservatives for voting against key government reform measures.

Allbaugh, who grew increasingly bitter about the treatment of his long-time boss (he once complained to Wisconsin Watchdog about Schultz losing out on choice committee assignments to the new-guard conservatives), testified that some Republicans were “giddy” during a 2011 closed-door meeting about the voter ID bill. Allbaugh insists some Republicans pushed the proposal to put obstacles in front of some voters who typically vote for Democrats.

Since July 2011, Kawsi said the state has issued 420,000 free ID cards, with just 52 people being denied through the petition process, AP reported.

“If there were no lines whatsoever and you walked right in and voted and the number of votes was actually lower this time around than in previous elections, the same people grumbling about the long lines would be complaining that there were no lines and no one showed up to vote because of voter ID,” Sanfelippo said. “They argue the same thing on both sides of the issue.”

The League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, which previously sued the state over the law, conceded things went fairly smoothly at the polls. “While the majority of voters did not have problems with same-day registration, producing an acceptable ID to vote, or completing the ballot, there were some noteworthy exceptions,” the league said in a recently released report.

“I asked, ‘What about voter ID? How did it work?’ Without exception, every chief said there was no problems with voter ID,” Spindell said in testimonybefore the Government Accountability Board.

He estimated 10 or 12 voters refused to show their photo IDs at the polling stations in questions. When they were told about the law, that they must show an ID or they wouldn’t be able to vote, they complied with the law. Spindell estimated that approximately 10 would-be voters said they left their photo IDs at home. Some went home and returned with identification, some didn’t.

In the city of Milwaukee, Spindell said there were eight provisional ballots provided to individuals who did not have proper ID. Those individuals are allowed to cast a temporary ballot which is recorded when they return with a valid photo ID.

Andrea Kaminski, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, told the GAB the organization trained “approximately 100 observers and placed them at polling sites in cities around the state. Preliminary figures from a League report expected to be released in a couple of weeks, “demonstrate an urgent need for vigorous voter education and training of election workers” before the November election, Kaminski said.

She noted that 322 people were “not allowed to register to vote in 175 polling places” while the observers were present. Of those, 183 people were turned away because they did not have acceptable proof of residence, and 24 individuals did not meet the 28-day state residency requirement, she said.

Then Kaminski summed up what the left feels is a failure, and voter ID advocates believe is the success of Wisconsin’s strengthened voter integrity laws.

“Many of these people would have been able to register to vote under the less restrictive laws a few years ago,” she said.

Another 76 people were registered but were unable to receive a regular ballot because they didn’t have acceptable IDs, Kaminski said. Of those, 33 cast provisional ballots and 22 were “offered provisional ballots but didn’t accept them.”

Is that because those would-be voters were not eligible to vote in that district or in that election? Was it because some of them may have been trying to illegally vote? Kaminski didn’t say.

Did the voter ID law in these cases do what is was created to do? Did it stop ineligible voters? Voter fraud?

This, after the U.S. Supreme Court last year refused to review the 7th Circuit’s 2014 ruling, granting another victory for voter ID supporters.

Laws requiring identification to vote have been implemented in several states, and they have repeatedly been upheld. The latest in North Carolina, where a federal court judge upheld a provision ending same-day registration. North Carolina is a photo ID state.

“The judge’s opinion also trimmed the early-voting period by seven days and OK’d the repeal of a provision that allowed ballots case outside a voter’s home precinct to count,” CNN reported.

The plaintiffs in Wisconsin’s lawsuit are challenging many of the same changes in the law.

“It’s silly, absolutely silly. The fact that they’re going to waste taxpayer dollars and time of judge to go to court, it’s pathetic,” Sanfelippo said.