Half will work over a decade in retirement

New research has been published today, which reveals that over half of all people will be forced to work for up to 11 years after their official retirement age, in order to make ends meet.

So why is this happening, and what does it mean for retirees?

The problem

The research, sponsored by a consortium of Age UK, the Actuarial Profession, Aviva and Partnership found that the root of the issue is that people are simply living longer, and retirement income cannot keep pace.

Niki Cleal, PPI Director, said: "In the last three decades, life expectancy has increased dramatically in the UK. On the whole this is good news for individuals, but it also means that many people will need to save more and work longer if they want to have an adequate retirement income."

Retirement Tips & Tools

Michelle Mitchell, Charity Director General of Age UK agreed: "Lower annuity returns and other factors mean that more and more people will have to work past their state pension age - and often for many years - if they are to have enough money to live comfortably."

Shortfall

The researchers started with the basic minimums. They calculated that the bare minimum income in retirement needed is £11,000 a year. The good news is that they discovered that 85% of those who are over the age of 50 and under state pension age right now will have the savings and pensions to be able to afford this. The bad news is, as they said: "For many people an income in retirement at this level is unlikely to be considered adequate."

They then investigated the proportion who would have enough cash to replicate the standard of living they had during their working life. They found a lucky 40% were in this position. They added that a further 10% of the over-50s might have sufficient state and private pension income to replicate working life living standards, if they continue to work and save for between one and five years after their State Pension Age.

However, they discovered that for a significant minority, this is a pipe dream. Cleal said: "A further 45% would have to work and save for 11 years or more beyond their State Pension Age to replicate their working life living standards in retirement."

The solution

The report concluded: "This demonstrates that many people need to start saving more today, if they want to avoid having to work much longer than they planned and want to have an adequate retirement income in the future."

Plus, of course, this current generation of retirees is far more likely to have generous occupational pensions than those retiring in a decade or more's time. It means we need to do more ourselves, as soon as possible.

Clive Bolton, 'at retirement' director at Aviva added: "In 2004 the Pensions Commission stressed that people would need to both save more and work longer in order to supplement the state provision. The PPI's study underlines this fact. We recommend people approach retirement with a clear picture of their financial needs and that they take a holistic view of all of the assets at their disposition, in order to manage the transition into later life."

Barriers to work

However, working into your 70s is easier said than done. The findings come in the wake of the latest unemployment statistics from the ONS which show older people are among the biggest victims of the UK's economic crisis. The latest figures show that the number of unemployed women aged 50-64 is up 27% on this time last year - a significantly bigger increase than any other age group. The ONS figures also show that there are now 118,000 people aged 50 plus in the UK who have been unemployed for two years or more - a 45% increase (37,000) on this time last year.

Mitchell added: ""The government must work to encourage employers to hire and retain older workers, and to provide training for those who need it if we are to avoid creating future generations of people in later life struggling to make ends meet."

It means that for millions of people 'retirement planning' becomes an issue of considering what you will be able to do in retirement to earn extra cash, and working to develop those skills so you can find work that's lucrative enough to live on. Because while we cannot be sure of anything in this current environment, the one thing you can rely on is that things aren't going to get any easier.

So I' may have too work till my mid seventies Ah Ah what a joke, I'm in my late fifties now and unemployedand have been for 3 years, so gizza job, go on gizza job, THEN tell me I'll have to work till I'm 77.Also I'm not entitled to benefits, so I'm a social Parasite, before some accusses me

Yes dcdr/.What planet are these people on, who make this up,fifty years work takes its toll on the body and the brain.Doctors will tell you as you get older your brain cellsdie of rapidly, do they want drivers to drive about with half a brain,or joiners to use woodworking machines, fingers all over the place.These polititions now, need some serious treatment.The real policy makers are the civil servants, the faceless wonders,as i call them.wes

denied NHS treatment because you are considered to old or not worth the expense.

If you do end up in hospital you may join thousands who die each year from malnutrician and dehydration IN OUR HOSPITALS

Considered a racist because the plave next door has just been given to an ex Somali pirate and his brood and you are pissed off because he is given more money in a week than you will receive in pension in a couple of months. Who gives a toss that you paid all your dues for decades.

We are not living longer, don't believe them, on average most men die in their 70s, many don't even make it to 65 to receive a penny of their pension, don't worry, because this ridiculous idea will never get of the ground.

alanbond - 10% of men die before 65 - - 25 % are still alive at over 80 - the age of 65 was picked as the retirement age at a time when 97% of men were dead by 66 - retirement pensions were only expected to be paid on average for les than 2 years - now its 20 years for the vast majority

HI RONNIE/i always value your comments, though here i feel has more to do with geographics, and professions.Up north where it is mainly manual labour, we do not see the same extension too lifespan, in my area anyway.Overall no doubt there will be.Did you get my reply, please give me your opinion.many thanks wes

Quite right, with old age comes ill health for many of us, and this is the main reason why we have a retirement age, these politicians who have secured a massive pension pot for themselves, have no idea what they are talking about.

I was unable to work for a number of years as my husband worked away, I have no family within 200 miles and a sick child which made it difficult for me. When I asked about a pension because I did not work I was told I could have one because of the tax break. I said well I don't want the tax incentive just to have a pension but this was refused. When I eventually went to work and reached 60 I am not entitled to a pension in my own right. So as my husband only has a partial pension I am still working. I did put as much as I could into a pep and insurance only to watch them go down the swannie. If the government are expecting us all to work longer why not get the rest of their act in gear so we can continue to pay national insurance so we can at least hope for a pension when we do eventually retire. I am faced, quite literally, with working till I die and as I work as a home carer the work is both strenuous, badly paid and we seem to have no rights at all. So give us a break and fit the benefits to the realities we are facing.

having worked for tfl for 33 years. i retired jan 2011 with a nice pension and a lump sum. enough was enough having worked for 40 years non-stop paying towards the scum who not work . i was not prepared to work past 54. everyday now is a holiday. life is too short.