I never said it is a good idea to send women of child bearing age into combat roles to risk being killed....it is the fastest way to exterminate a race.

And there would be very few women who could match men's physical strength or join the grueling ranger job without them lowering standards, but if those few can without exceptions then that's the few who probably aren't interested in motherhood anyway.

I never said it is a good idea to send women of child bearing age into combat roles to risk being killed....it is the fastest way to exterminate a race.

And there would be very few women who could match men's physical strength or join the grueling ranger job without them lowering standards, but if those few can without exceptions then that's the few who probably aren't interested in motherhood anyway.

The main issue that people aren't grasping is that the initial tests and training are by no means representative of the actual demands placed on those who are operational. Two different worlds, and the best woman couldn't hack it, period. As selective as these roles are for men, there is no valid justification for opening these roles up to women.

This woman might be able to drag a 180lb man 50 yards on opening day, but could she do it 9 days later being sleep deprived, undernourished, borderline dehydrated, with a 60-100lb pack on her back plus the rest of the gear? NO! A woman's body breaks down much faster than a man's in every way, and under those conditions she would be lucky to be standing after day 3.

This crap is just the Zio-Bolshevik buttplugs fostering further decline. Feminist retardation, the whole bit of it.

Firstly have these sixty women been though--basic then AIT- airborne and RIP?

I have known several women in the military that might have cut in Infantry(They are walking around with Special Forces Group Coin I gifted to them in which I obtained from our Group S-3 NCOIC) however women serving even in Big Army combat arms is not about the few that can(THE VERY FEW) it is about the VAST MAJORITY THAT CAN'T.

I am saying it right now--THE ONLY WAY THE FIRST WOMAN gets by Ranger School and becomes a qualified tabbed ranger -- is lowered standards. No way if the standards are as when I went thought it(the swim ). The odds of woman making standards would be tantamount to an ant lifting an elephant off the ground .

The powers at be have decided that women will be in the combat arms. And when washout rates of women DRASTICALLY exceed those of men the standards will change.I just read some PC moron state SF standards must be reexamined--coff coof because the current ones are all we have to judge women by.

The only way for blacks and women to make numbers in the elite forces is to change what it means to be an SF trooper and Ranger . Even in 11B infantry --they will not send the FEW exceptions who could do the job, because of politics they will push equality under any circumstance therefore deciding in their wisdom that any woman who can pass basic training (which by the way, is a total joke) is up to the task. They will not under any circumstances send the exceptional but will send mass groups of women who are not up to the task physically or mentally. They are all ready doing this with men, sending incompetent, weak mommys boys into an occupation for men. Many fat guts that should never have been given their infantry cord and sent into a grown up Army,much less get the ideas behind a map and compass.

The vast majority of people advocating this LUNACY -the jewish media— radical feminist with an agenda of gender neutral standards --civilian board heavily influenced by politicians. DoD pukes-- leftist communists--useful idiots—and the never been in a combat MOS— Gloria Alred dykes will take cases pro bono for the publicity to get lower standards, or change them, to accommodate women. DoD ,Big Army and radical feminist social experiment's in the combat arms result in body bags coming home. JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE A FEW EXCEPTIONAL GENETICALLY GIFTED THAT CAN--is not how it is going to work. Radical feminist dilly dallying and cultural Marxism means pc KIA –NEEDLESS KIA’s to satisfy the false gods of multiculturalism.

All should read a little of Gates 2009 die-verity commission --standardized tests are considered a structural obstruction to minorities. We’re talking ASVAB, aptitude, service tests, and Physical Fitness.It is the same old, same old if more White male recruits score higher on the ASVAB, this opens more career fields for them than it would, minority and women recruits. This is observed to be as a fault in the organism, a glitch causing gender and racial inequality that the tests and testing necessitates to address and rectify.

Long before this one could see the writing on the wall for women coming home in body bags in mass casualties during Infantry assaults all in the name of their dirty agenda. It is a sorry world going along with this and open queers--the agenda useful idoits-jews-anti-Whites have sank to new lows.

What a joke...
Just going to amount to PC graduation and classes, and more white women thrown into a Jewish meat grinder.
I dont even feel like pointed out why women shouldn't be on the battlefield, just use common sense.

How are they, or better yet, why are they allowing women to go to Ranger school when they aren't allowed regular infantry? I thought winning yourself a chance for Ranger selection, to go through the school and eventually get your tab was a chance for regular infantry to show they are better than the average soldier?

Getting to go to Ranger school is similar to a regular Marine infantry getting a chance to try out for Battalion Recon. Or an Army soldier trying out for a Special Forces slot, like a Marine trying for a Force Recon slot. Most female military cannot put a pack on their back and do a simple 8 mile forced march. Every time we saw them doing one at division EVERY female had dropped out within the first three miles.

Someone at Army HQ really hates the Rangers. They stripped their black berets from them in the late 90's, now they are going to water down their school by introducing lighter requirements so more females can participate in their school.

There are many women that have the ability to pass the physical and mental challenges to become a Ranger. To suggest otherwise is only fooling yourself. Look at some of the top women athletes around the United States. Have any of you ever watched the Cross Fit Games? Those women do things that most men only ever dream of being able to do.

With that being said. I don't believe there is a necessity to allow women to become Rangers. IMO, it's morally wrong. I don't need a woman guarding my freedoms nor do I want.

I have to disagree with you here. Look at what happened with the Marines who were so confident, as you are, that combat MOS seeking women can do as many pull ups as the men. None passed, and more than half failed to do even 3. Even if they could, however, pull ups demonstrate strength relative to weight, in a situation where brute strength is what is needed. A 115 pound women who can do 20 pull ups (exceptional to the extreme) may still have a really hard time carrying an injured 200 lb man, plus another 30 lbs of attached gear, off the field of battle. It's not really just about carrying rucks and pulling triggers. It's also about making sure your wounded don't end up being your dead.
That's merely Marines and pull ups. The Rangers are much more hardcore than a standard Marine. Plus there's the issue of Rangers doing a lot of recon. Scout squads behind enemy lines alone. This isn't an insult, more of an interesting phenomenon, but if you are only around men for awhile, you can smell a woman a mile away. I mean literally smell them. Something about being away from them makes their pheromones hit you hard. So you can throw scouting missions right out the window.

I have to disagree with you here. Look at what happened with the Marines who were so confident, as you are, that combat MOS seeking women can do as many pull ups as the men. None passed, and more than half failed to do even 3. Even if they could, however, pull ups demonstrate strength relative to weight, in a situation where brute strength is what is needed. A 115 pound women who can do 20 pull ups (exceptional to the extreme) may still have a really hard time carrying an injured 200 lb man, plus another 30 lbs of attached gear, off the field of battle. It's not really just about carrying rucks and pulling triggers. It's also about making sure your wounded don't end up being your dead.
That's merely Marines and pull ups. The Rangers are much more hardcore than a standard Marine. Plus there's the issue of Rangers doing a lot of recon. Scout squads behind enemy lines alone. This isn't an insult, more of an interesting phenomenon, but if you are only around men for awhile, you can smell a woman a mile away. I mean literally smell them. Something about being away from them makes their pheromones hit you hard. So you can throw scouting missions right out the window.