This is Dean T. Hartwell's final say on what happened to the alleged passengers and planes of 9/11. He also talks about the value of truth seeking to our society.He talks about events in recent history. The JFK assassination, the Viet Nam War, Sept 11, etc. Our leaders and the media frequently lie to us about these kinds of events.Lies are nothing new. Most people have been lied to most of their lives. (Santa Claus - a man in a red suit flown by reindeer delivering gifts to millions of kids on one night!). No big deal.What this book does is to tell the reader why our leaders lie. And how they benefit from it.This book won’t change the world. That’s OK. The world isn’t going to change because someone says someone is lying! But maybe some people will.

The government did not conspire on 9/11. In fact, the government can’t even tie its own shoes. Individuals act on behalf of the government to collect taxes and to pay for services for its residents. Individuals acted on 9/11. Some of them reported what they or others did to the media. The media is not one person or one entity. But people who work for the media with the greatest range to broadcast messages frequently choose to say the same things and to not say other things. No one saw the alleged hijackers of 9/11. No one witnessed the alleged hijackings of 9/11. How did we learn of hijackings on 9/11? Individuals falsely reported to individuals in the media that they received calls from people claiming to be hijacked. Many in the media and who act on behalf of the government continue to tell us about hijackings on 9/11. Most people hear the lie about hijackers – on television, the radio and the movies - and do not react to the lie. They may not see what good it would do to challenge it. Or they are waiting for someone else to speak up. The author uses this book to speak up and call a lie a lie. Your government won’t care, because it can’t. The question is whether you care about where your leaders have taken you and where you may go next. Freedom does not end with a bang, but a whimper. Read Planes without Passengers, 2nd Edition and get to know one piece of truth not just about 9/11 but about us. Click here

Jim Fetzer and I wrote an article on Veterans Today in which we discuss the difficulties of getting alternative theories to the official 9/11 theory in the media. The latest disappointment, OpEd News, where I have posted numerous articles on the topic, turned down my latest "Why There Were No Real Passengers on 9/11" by saying that "we do not accept any more 9/11 stories."

For the complete article, which includes "Why There Were No Real Passengers on 9/11," click here.

Where Was Barbara Olson on 9/11?

“You don’t believe the official theory? Then tell me what happened to Barbara Olson!” I call this the “Barbara Olson Question,” issued usually by defenders of the theory of 9/11 that says, among other things, that the renowned political commentator was on a flight that was taken over by hijackers and smashed into the Pentagon.

To the one typically asking the question, there are only two choices: Olson perished in a plane crash at the Pentagon that day or Olson perished in a plane crash at the Pentagon that day. In other words, no other answer will be acceptable.The fact that Olson has apparently not been seen or heard from is proof positive that the plane crash (and the rest of the official story) is true.

Her alleged flight, American Airlines 77, was not scheduled to fly and did not fly that day according to the original Bureau of Transportation Statistics. For these reasons alone, we can rule out the official story.

Not that official theory defenders care. To understand this question, then, is to understand the other possible answers.

Possibility #1: Barbara Olson died in another manner on or after September 11, 2011. She may have taken another plane and gone somewhere else that day. She may have been killed by plotters or died of other causes.

Possibility #2: Barbara Olson lives today under a new identity. She may have been part of the plot and went somewhere else to live a new life with a new identity. Or she decided on her own to leave. Some have suggested she has returned to society with a new identity.

The details are simply not available for confirmation. But the problem with the Barbara Olson Question is with its users. Failure to tell them where Barbara Olson is at this moment is the same to them as failure to provide an adequate theory on that day’s events.

This issue illustrates the need to ask the right questions. The better question here is “What are the possibilities as to what happened to Barbara Olson.” Only then do we free ourselves from the trap the Barbara Olson Question poses.