Arc Doesn't Speak For Disabled In State Facilities

I take issue with comments by Leslie Simoes, executive director of the Arc Connecticut, in her response to the article "Federal Audit: State Oversight Failed" [May 25, Page 1].

Ms. Simoes cannot speak for my sister when she states that "outcomes for individuals with I/DD [intellectual and developmental disabilities] are better when they are in community settings. The real solution is simple -- close the institutions and all state-operated facilities today."

My sister resided in the community -- she lived at two group homes, and these two private group homes in the community failed my sister, so much so that she had to be transferred out and into a regional center.

As for the outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities being better when they are in community settings, I could not disagree more. My sister has thrived while living at Ella Grasso Regional Center for the past 14 years. Ms. Simoes should stop speaking for me and other guardians who fully disagree with her opinion -- those of us who have loved ones who reside at state-operated facilities and are thriving.

Why should these state facilities be closed when it's not in the best interest of the residents? Whose side is the Arc on?