THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THIS BLOG IS TO SHARE WITH THE READER ISSUES OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE FROM A PROGRESSIVE PERSPECTIVE.
ORDER OF MOST READERS OF THIS BLOG: USA, RUSSIA, FRANCE, UNITED KINGDOM, GERMANY, UKRAINE,CANADA, INDIA,and CHINA.

Saturday, 14 November 2015

PARIS BOMBING (13 November 2015) and WESTERN “TERRORISM” POLICY

The bombing that
took place in Paris with many casualties was a human tragedy and a political
disaster for Western anti-terrorism policy. A day before ISIS suicide bombers
in Paris, the bombing in Beirut, Lebanon demonstrated the ease with which
jihadists fighting against the Assad regime are able to operate. In both cases the
jihadist group ISIS operating in Syria and Iraq claimed responsibility and
celebrated its success in retaliation for those trying to strike at ISIS
targets. It is also likely that an ISIS affiliate in Egypt bombed a Russian passenger
plane killing 224 people on 31 October 2015.

Three bombings
within a remarkably short span of time demonstrate the reach of an organization
that was once backed by US allies in the Middle East, and possibly by the US
indirectly in the war that the US started to bring down the Assad regime, all
in the name of freedom and democracy, just as the US has been delivering
freedom and democracy in Libya. The
quest to destabilize and ultimately overthrow Assad has failed in the last
couple of years and made matters worse for everyone, above all the people of
Syria. The US and its European and regional allies have managed to create a new
force that has some appeal at least with the radicalized Sunni Muslims not just
in Syria and Iraq but across the Middle East and beyond. Now that US secretary of
State John Kerry has been in talks with Russia about how to stabilize Syria,
perhaps agree on limited spheres of influence as imperialists, so that the
greater threat of ISIS is contained.

Based on the
results alone, one could conclude that the US policy of destabilization that helped
to create the conditions for ISIS to operate is a miserable failure with
horrible consequences. Of course, if one advocates a policy of redrawing the
map of Syria and Iraq, as many Westerners and Zionists do, then the policy has
been a resounding success. After all, both countries are already badly divided
along sectarian and ethnic lines, and what could be a better way of limiting
the influence of Iran in Iran and Syria and Russia in Syria other than
redrawing the map just as Western imperialists almost did a century ago?

One would think
that the lessons learned from the US policy of supporting jihadists in the
1980s in Afghanistan against the pro-USSR regime had become a lesson for policy
change that would actually yield the desired results. On the contrary, as a
status quo power immersed in Cold War ideology, the US does not change policy
just because it backfires with dire consequences for itself and its allies. The
military solution option is the only one on the table for the US for a
combination of reasons. This means that cycle of jihadist attacks will continue
as will the response with conventional militarist solutions that would in fact
produce more unconventional warfare. Looking beyond the military solution to
the root causes – social, economic and politic injustice – is out of the question
during the era when neoliberal thinking prevails across the Western World.

1.The
obsession of projecting strength through raw military power in the world as a
way of retaining Pax American alive.

No matter the failures of the military solution, and
unintended benefits to US rivals Russia, China and Iran that do not want the US
to have exclusive role in determining the balance of power in the Middle East,
policymakers in Washington, backed by the corporate world and media do not
deviate from the failed military solution option until there is no choice as
was the case with Iran and the nuclear deal. The empirical evidence suggests
that while military solutions as a means of maintaining Pax Americana began to
show weaknesses as far back as the 1960s during the Vietnam War. Yet, the US
will not abandon a policy that has failed to deliver. Pax American was dead and
buried during Vietnam, and President Johnson implied as much when he announced
on TV that he would not seek reelection, knowing the failure of Vietnam was a
resounding failure for Pax American he was supposed to guard and expand.
However, the lessons of Vietnam included everything but political solutions to
crises. Instead, a commitment to go deeper into debt as a nation – currently $17
trillion or about equal to GDP – so that Pax Americana’s glory could live on if
not in the real world, at least in the minds of delusional politicians while
defense contractors made huge profits.

2.Ideological
commitment to militarism and imperialism, despite the evolution of new
multi-polar world in which China plays a determining role.

The diehard ideologues to right-wing solutions have
been around from the early days of the Truman administration advocating
unilateral action in a world where the US defined its national security
interests not just within its sovereign territory, not just in the Western
Hemisphere as part of the long-standing Pan-Americanism perspective that dates
back to the Monroe Doctrine, but across the world as the reckless and
dysfunctional world’s policeman. Unable to exist as a society that is content
with playing a role commensurate to its actual economic, political and economic
power in the world, the ideologues advocating unilateralism, militarism and
imperialism (intervention via over military action or covert operations) have
proved detrimental to the security of the nation and to the destabilization of
all places where there is intervention.

The US invaded and occupied Iraq under Saddam Hussein
on a series of blatant lies, created chaos and divisions with an otherwise unified
country, and above all it is responsible for millions of refugees that are a huge
problem for neighboring nations. Similarly, the US goal to bring down Syria’s
Assad and make that country a US satellite instead of one where Russia and Iran
enjoy influence has entailed the creation of millions of refugees for which the
right-wing American ideologues want harsh punishment instead of amnesty by EU
nations. Blinded by the notion of an invincible America pursuing its destiny to
exert preeminent influence if not dominate the world, these ideologues making
money as consultants, politicians, media analysts and above all defense
contractors thrive on destabilization and what they call crisis management;
ironically for crises they create but then propose to “manage”.

3.Tangible
interests of profits by defense contractors who hire former politicians and
high level defense and intelligence officers to work and lobby for them.

President Eisenhower’s warning to the American people
about the military industrial complex that was actually forged during the
Wilson administration to manage World War I may have come too late. To this day,
no one takes seriously the Eisenhower warning, partly because he was then
advised by the IMF that the dollar as a reserve currency was becoming weak and
would ultimately become even weaker owing to balance of payments deficits. Although
the US could hardly afford both guns and butter, Johnson pursued such a
reckless policy by escalating the Vietnam War to the delight of defense
companies.

Because there is instability, jihadist terrorism,
regional conflicts, and neglect of diplomacy as the first rather than the last
option to resolve conflict, the profits of defense contractors rise as their
stock market price indicates, and indeed the profits of every company from food
and soft drink suppliers to defense to makers of drones. One cannot possibly
ignore the power of the defense contractors and all industries feeding off the
defense and intelligence budgets that simply drive up the public debt and
weaken the civilian economy.

These people thrive on events that drive governments raise
defense spending just at the time they should be cutting it and considering
political solutions that may actually work against the reality of unending
military solution failures that only generate more “unconventional warfare” or
terrorism. As cynical as it may sound, all those making a living from the
defense and intelligence domain delight in events such as that of Paris on 13
November 2015. These people know that peace and stability means cuts in their business,
so they have no interest in political solutions to conflict.

4.The
media is always there to pump up militarism as the sole solution.

The Western media had no problem with ISIS striking down
the Russian plane and Beirut where Hezbollah was the target. In fact, the
western media was criticizing Russian president Putin for striking at ISIS
targets, prompting the US to indirectly assist ISIS by sending air cover to
protect certain pro-West assets in Syria along the Turkish border. The media, reflecting
US official position, sent the message to the world that the problem at hand
was really Putin and Assad, rather than the barbaric ISIS that Russian planes
were targeting; that is until the Paris bombing that had some arguing drive the idea into peoples’ heads that it is
possible to wipe out unconventional type of war, or terrorism by simply striking
hard at the enemy.

While the media does not create terrorism, it
celebrates militarism by selecting news analysts and by reporting on stories of
military solutions to conflict. It may be argued that the media must reflect the
status quo and mirror what governments are pursuing. Editorial decisions are
made on what stories to cover, how to cover them, and what spin to put on them,
not just on FOX NEWS that has been called out by a number of organizations for extreme right wing coverage, but the New York Times that many regard as
liberal newspaper, yet it hardly differs in goals from FOX.

5.Will
Terrorism Subside or proliferate.

Contrary to what many politicians including the French
President announced about closing the border and adopting other such “security
measures” to preempt any strikes on French soil, and contrary to what British
PM announced about striking down and ending jihadist activities, terrorism will
continue and proliferate. This is because the underlying causes of terrorism
are not addressed, and they include Western militarism and economic
imperialism, complemented by racism and religious prejudice.

In 2015, we have much greater and wider forms of
terrorism than we did when the US announced its war on terror after 9/11. The
public relations exercises intended for mass consumption project the idea that
government has the solution at hand and it is in position of protecting its
citizens. However, jihadists already reside within the nations they wish to
strike and history has demonstrated that unconventional war has never been won
by conventional military means. One could argue that the Russian Tsars in the
19th century lacked the sophisticated science and technology
available to the West in 2015.

Fair enough, but how do then explain the Paris
bombings taking place when France is well known for its sophisticated
intelligence and technology available? This does not mean that measures cannot
be taken for greater security of citizens, but it does mean that there will
never be a full proof method of combating unconventional warfare (terrorism)
because of its nature unless the underlying causes are addressed. The political
solution remains the only option to eradicate terrorism which is simply a
publicity stunt that never brings about systemic change toward greater social
justice because it lacks grassroots support and alienates people that would
otherwise sympathize with the cause of social justice.

In the aftermath of the Paris bombings, the response I
expect from the Western countries is one similar to the US in 9/11, although
Russia will take advantage of the situation and once again propose a
multilateral approach for a conventional strike against ISIS. One would think
that if ISIS was able to bring down the Russia plane over Egypt, hit at the
heart of Hezbollah in Beirut and hit Paris within a few days, there must be a
wide network of support behind it with significant links.

There are still questions about which governments,
corporations and varieties of businessmen still maintain indirect ties to this
group that needs such cooperation to manage its considerable economic and
strategic affairs. Similarly, there are questions about the US policy toward
Syria that one the one hand, claims to be fighting to undermine ISIS, but on
the other hand, it wants to bring Assad down and undermines Russia efforts to fight
ISIS. Clearly, a coordinated policy between US-NATO with Russia, China and Iran
could go a very long way to contain ISIS. However, this is not how US ideologues
see the matter resolved; this is not what the defense contractors want, and
this is not what the populist Republicans and rightwing media advocate. It
makes sense that they keep citizens living in a state of perpetual fear as a
means of imposing sociopolitical conformity amid a period when the
socioeconomic gap has been widening on the US despite a modest economic recovery.
Unless systemic problems of the Muslims – social justice issues - and the
relationship of Muslim nations with the West are addressed, terrorism is a
reality that will become more prominent in the next decade.

"A
gripping, passion-filled, and suspenseful tale of love, betrayal,
political and religious intrigue, this novel entices the reader’s
senses and intellect beyond conventions. Slaves to Gods and Demons
takes the reader through a roller coaster enthralling journey of
personal trials and triumphs of a family emerging vanquished and
destitute after World War II.

Narrated by a young boy, Morfeos, modeled after the Greco-Roman pagan
deity of sleep and dreams, the book reveals the soul of a people trying
to ascertain and assert their identity while rebuilding their lives and
recapturing the glory of a lost civilization.

Seeking liberation from restraints of time, social conventions, and
binding traditions, the deity of dreams provides the conformist and the
free-spirited characters in the novel with venues for redemption that
are mere paths toward illusions. Exploring the complexities of human
relationships shaped by priest and politician alike, the novel rests on
the central theme that life is invariably a series of illusions, some
of which are euphoric, most horrifying, all an integral part of daily
existence.

Striving for purpose amid life’s absurdities after the destruction of
western civilization in two global wars, the characters in Slaves to
Gods and Demons struggle between holding on to the glory and grandeur of
a pagan legacy and the Christian present shaped by contemporary
secular events in Western Civilization."