This could be a biggie if it happens According to sources that watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling. As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue. First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.' Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg. Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not the President himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ to sue the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens. And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group is caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

To CharlieE: no, RepubliKKKans are much more interested in pursuing useless cases about nothing except booga booga racism because it excites and distracts the base from what's really going on.

The Military Industrial Complex, and the white Oligarchs getting fabulously wealthy off of the deaths of US and foreign citizens, know that all they have to is dangle a "booga booga scary scary Kenyan muzlinz" meme out there, and the T-tard base will react on cue as predicted.

Propoganda written by the Koch brothers to enure to the benefit of them and their billionaire Oligarch friends.

Hey Anon: guess you haven't be hanging around here very long. The rightwing propoganda machine poops out strings of falsehoods daily. Look thru the archives: all you'll see is lies, racism, sexism and gun worship.

What lie? That businesses can now use their treasuries to further corrupt the political system? Seems pretty straightforward.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government.

No one who knows anything about American history could make such a statement. The branches have been at each others throats for over 2 centuries. The whole bloody system is DESIGNED to put them at each other's throats!

First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something.

Someone never heard of the militia act put in place by President Washington.

The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.

Ah, the ole "state's rights" line of thinking. God damn the government, always telling us what we can and can't do!!!! Except the state governments, those should be obeyed 100%.

In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

You can always just pay the fine. But really, why would you want to "opt out"? Do you not want access to health insurance for you and your family? Isn't it almost criminally irresponsible to put your family's health and fiscal well being at risk? And if you "opt out" and then show up at an emergency room, guess who pay your bill if you can't? I DO! You fucking freeloader!!!

Then there's some birther stuff blah blah blah....

Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.

BULL-FUCKING-SHIT!

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ to sue the state of Arizona

Pretty sure the Constitution gives the federal government sway over foreign policy, and I'm definitely sure that the executive is right to try and protect the rights of American citizens.

The group is caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.

Or... two black guys were loitering outside a building where one of them lived. The Bush DOJ tried but failed to prosecute them for voter intimidation, and gave the pitiful excuse that they couldn't actually find any voters who had been intimidated. Amateurs.

who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

SCARY BLACK PEOPLE ARE COMING FOR YOUR BABIES!!!!

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

My goodness is anyone else sick of the depressing news being spewed from every media outlet? I am, so I dressed it up a little bit! Below is the link to my politically conservative blog parity and leave me a comment teliing me what you think!http://barackobamaisanalien.blogspot.com/

Gee, BOIAA -- I find the news depressing, too. But I'm bummed out because right wing extremist policies have pretty much screwed we the people. I should think you'd be happy as a pig in shit that your side is "winning".

"First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something."

Um, which Constitutional principle would that be?

Congress has the power to levy duties and taxes in order to provide for the defense and general welfare of the nation.

While you can argue with whether or not universal health care counts, you cannot simply claim that congress lacks the power to force its citizens to "purchase" something (although they are not really purchasing anything). But hey, don't take my word for it. Look up the 16th amendment sometime.

To Hibyrd: LOL! Yeah almost all of these stupid posts - esp the ones with all the scaaaaaaary stuff in them - mostly all start out the same way. As in: just imagine if this happened!! Ohmigawd!! EEEK!

Of course, the *fact* that it's not happening at all is quite irrelevant to those who wish to be scared the live-long day in their fictional fantasy land provided to them by Rupert Murdoch and his bullying mouthpieces.

Welcome to the Right-Wing Forward Museum

MyRightWingDad.net is a museum dedicated to following the course of American history through a unique lens -- the emails "Red-America" forwards worldwide. Take a look around the archive using the keywords below, and leave a comment or two.

This museum displays unedited, often offensive and untrue material with no endorsement intended by curators or contributors.