About The Author

Did AAP’s parliamentary secretaries revel in ‘office of profit’ — that is the query

an afternoon after President Pranab Mukherjee withheld assent to a invoice exceeded by way of the Delhi legislative assembly to exempt the post of parliamentary secretary from the purview of the office of income, the Aam Aadmi party came underneath attack from the BJP and Congress for the ‘more-judicial appointments.’
while AAP insisted that the parliamentary secretaries did not hold an ‘workplace of earnings’, the BJP released files from an RTI utility displaying that the 21 MLAs who held the submit were allotted rooms as office space with the aid of the Speaker of the legislative meeting.
The felony and applicable definition of ‘office of earnings’ and interpretation of ‘pecuniary gain’ now remains at the center of the talk over the disqualification of the 21 parliamentary secretaries.
percentage this text
proportion
associated ARTICLE
AAP vs Centre: The 21-MLA disputeDid AAP’s Parliamentary Secretaries revel in ‘office Of income’ — this is The QuestionPresident ‘withholds’ assent to Delhi govt bill on parliamentary secy postPresident refuses assent to Kejriwal executive’s invoice over office of profit, destiny of 21 AAP MLAs hangs in balanceOffice of income: EC does now not have jurisdiction to listen difficulty, say AAP MLAsOffice of profit: AAP MLAs are seeking more time from EC to report responseAAP vs Centre: The 21-MLA disputeDid AAP’s Parliamentary Secretaries experience ‘office Of earnings’ — this is The QuestionPresident ‘withholds’ assent to Delhi government invoice on parliamentary secy postPresident refuses assent to Kejriwal govt’s bill over office of profit, destiny of 21 AAP MLAs hangs in balanceOffice of earnings: EC does no longer have jurisdiction to listen issue, say AAP MLAsOffice of profit: AAP MLAs are looking for more time from EC to record responseAAP vs Centre: The 21-MLA disputeDid AAP’s Parliamentary Secretaries experience ‘office Of profit’ — this is The QuestionPresident ‘withholds’ assent to Delhi executive invoice on parliamentary secy postPresident refuses assent to Kejriwal government’s invoice over office of profit, destiny of 21 AAP MLAs hangs in balanceOffice of profit: EC does no longer have jurisdiction to hear trouble, say AAP MLAsOffice of earnings: AAP MLAs searching for more time from EC to document reaction.of their submission to the Election fee, the 21 parliamentary secretaries had submitted a respond from the overall management department of the Delhi authorities which has stated that it had not spent any money in reimbursing the parliamentary secretaries nor had it assigned them separate workplace space or separate cars. Senior AAP leaders said that all legalities have been appeared into and claimed there has been no manner to call the facilities given via the legislative assembly as ‘pecuniary advantages.’
Watch Video: What’s making information

The political slugfest between AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal and top Minister Narendra Modi promises to keeps rage over the difficulty. greater urgently, AAP will need to look for a valid legal bailout to the trouble handy. at the same time as Kejriwal insisted that the parliamentary secretaries have been ‘no longer given a paisa’ and have been running for ‘loose’, the parliamentary secretaries will find it tough to provide an explanation for their function earlier than the Election fee. The EC is in all likelihood to provide every of them a private listening to, following which it’ll write to the President on the next route of motion.
As of now the AAP is brazening it out; it seems deceptively confident at the query of disqualification arguing that with out a ‘pecuniary benefit’ given to the parliamentary secretaries there can be no grounds for disqualification.
read | AAP stands for ‘Accusing, Abusing birthday celebration’: BJP
In its defense, the birthday celebration has also referred to the appointment of parliamentary secretaries in different states which can be constitutionally an office of earnings. It has argued that in evaluation, the AAP authorities’s parliamentary secretaries have no longer been given any perks or emoluments. The celebration says it had proposed to offer to them workplace space and a car for professional use – both of which, it claims, have now not been given.
The files released through BJP and the complex felony nature of the problem will many a twist to the talk in the coming days. For now the parliamentary secretaries have stepped back and insist that handiest CM Arvind Kejriwal and the three birthday celebration spokespersons will comment on the issue.