Pryor did well 2 years ago running go routes for Cleveland. He's still in development for every other route in the tree.

We should not be signing him for anything more than 1.5M and he's going to have to play ST. It's not good enough to act too good like a QB. He was making 3M as a Redskin last year and he's no longer with them and they're the team that just gave Richardson all that money for a vertical threat.

Marcus Johnson, Jaron Brown, now potentially Prior. Me thinks they are gettin back to classic Air Coryell. Guys that are vertical threats for a vertical passing attack. I like it. Develop a run game and kill teams vertically, that’s when we were at our best anyways. Get back to our roots.

He turned down a four-year offer worth about $32 million from the Browns last season, and they immediately gave similar money to free agent flop Kenny Britt.Pryor signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, but was hurt most of the season there.

He turned down a four-year offer worth about $32 million from the Browns last season, and they immediately gave similar money to free agent flop Kenny Britt.Pryor signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, but was hurt most of the season there.

UGotHawked wrote:It won't work. Pryor refuses to play WR because he says he "can't catch."

He has been at WR for a few years now with one 1,000 yard season under his belt.

Sarcasm on.

RICHMOND — Three years ago, Terrelle Pryor Sr. was a quarterback with tunnel vision. He could see no other career option. As he vied to make the Seattle Seahawks as a No. 3 QB, he squinted on a sunny Pacific Northwest day and refused to entertain the thought that, with his extraordinary size and athleticism, he could reinvent himself at another position.

“I don’t know how to catch,” Pryor told me in June 2014. “I don’t know how to run the ball as a running back. I’ve been a quarterback my whole life.”

He turned down a four-year offer worth about $32 million from the Browns last season, and they immediately gave similar money to free agent flop Kenny Britt.Pryor signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, but was hurt most of the season there.

He was benched before getting hurt, from what I have read. He was IR in week 9 No specifics though and that's the important part. There's no specifics.

Injuring his ankle in week two, he was limited to 20 catches for 240 yards and a TD.He underwent ankle surgery in November, and will be ready for offseason practices.

My understanding is that he started the 1st and 5th games but was effected by an ankle injury as of week two. In the end, the Redskins seemed to view him more as a role player than a starter. For some reason I think of him as a risk in Seattle. I can't visualize him as happy in a spread the ball around role instead of a full time go to starter. I tend to assume he is better off with Hue Jackson.

He turned down a four-year offer worth about $32 million from the Browns last season, and they immediately gave similar money to free agent flop Kenny Britt.Pryor signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, but was hurt most of the season there.

He turned down a four-year offer worth about $32 million from the Browns last season, and they immediately gave similar money to free agent flop Kenny Britt.Pryor signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, but was hurt most of the season there.

He turned down a four-year offer worth about $32 million from the Browns last season, and they immediately gave similar money to free agent flop Kenny Britt.Pryor signed a one-year deal with the Redskins, but was hurt most of the season there.

He was benched before getting hurt, from what I have read. He was IR in week 9 No specifics though and that's the important part. There's no specifics.

Injuring his ankle in week two, he was limited to 20 catches for 240 yards and a TD.He underwent ankle surgery in November, and will be ready for offseason practices.

My understanding is that he started the 1st and 5th games but was effected by an ankle injury as of week two. In the end, the Redskins seemed to view him more as a role player than a starter. For some reason I think of him as a risk in Seattle. I can't visualize him as happy in a spread the ball around role instead of a full time go to starter. I tend to assume he is better off with Hue Jackson.

Much appreciated for the info. Your concerns seem valid. I don't know what we'd pay for this and I don't know how he would respond in this type of offense. Yes, we like to go vertical, but he'll also have to block and do all the other dirty work along with spreading the ball around. I look at that Cleveland highlight and it's apparent that he scares the hell out of a lot of corners. He's just flat out bigger, faster, stronger and it works even though he doesn't run good routes. If we offer him another 3M like the skins, I think the Browns offer much better. I don't know...

Yeah, but Jimmy and PRich had dropped more balls than any receivers the Hawks have had in the last 15 years. You also see that you can put a pretty good 6'0 athletic corner on Pryor and he just dominates them physically. Not just in a Jimmy Graham way (size) or a PRich way (speed), but he does both regularly. He'll outrun, slow down, high point, push off, etc. Even when he's jogging or varying speed for an underthrown ball CBs have a real tough time with him.

Or at least they did two years ago. Dude is a pretty special athlete. I'm just not sure how much this is worth and it's still a gamble.

He was benched before getting hurt, from what I have read. He was IR in week 9 No specifics though and that's the important part. There's no specifics.

Injuring his ankle in week two, he was limited to 20 catches for 240 yards and a TD.He underwent ankle surgery in November, and will be ready for offseason practices.

My understanding is that he started the 1st and 5th games but was effected by an ankle injury as of week two. In the end, the Redskins seemed to view him more as a role player than a starter. For some reason I think of him as a risk in Seattle. I can't visualize him as happy in a spread the ball around role instead of a full time go to starter. I tend to assume he is better off with Hue Jackson.

Much appreciated for the info. Your concerns seem valid. I don't know what we'd pay for this and I don't know how he would respond in this type of offense. Yes, we like to go vertical, but he'll also have to block and do all the other dirty work along with spreading the ball around. I look at that Cleveland highlight and it's apparent that he scares the hell out of a lot of corners. He's just flat out bigger, faster, stronger and it works even though he doesn't run good routes. If we offer him another 3M like the skins, I think the Browns offer much better. I don't know...

vin.couve12 wrote:He was benched before getting hurt, from what I have read. He was IR in week 9 No specifics though and that's the important part. There's no specifics.

Injuring his ankle in week two, he was limited to 20 catches for 240 yards and a TD.He underwent ankle surgery in November, and will be ready for offseason practices.

My understanding is that he started the 1st and 5th games but was effected by an ankle injury as of week two. In the end, the Redskins seemed to view him more as a role player than a starter. For some reason I think of him as a risk in Seattle. I can't visualize him as happy in a spread the ball around role instead of a full time go to starter. I tend to assume he is better off with Hue Jackson.

Much appreciated for the info. Your concerns seem valid. I don't know what we'd pay for this and I don't know how he would respond in this type of offense. Yes, we like to go vertical, but he'll also have to block and do all the other dirty work along with spreading the ball around. I look at that Cleveland highlight and it's apparent that he scares the hell out of a lot of corners. He's just flat out bigger, faster, stronger and it works even though he doesn't run good routes. If we offer him another 3M like the skins, I think the Browns offer much better. I don't know...

My understanding is that he started the 1st and 5th games but was effected by an ankle injury as of week two. In the end, the Redskins seemed to view him more as a role player than a starter. For some reason I think of him as a risk in Seattle. I can't visualize him as happy in a spread the ball around role instead of a full time go to starter. I tend to assume he is better off with Hue Jackson.

Much appreciated for the info. Your concerns seem valid. I don't know what we'd pay for this and I don't know how he would respond in this type of offense. Yes, we like to go vertical, but he'll also have to block and do all the other dirty work along with spreading the ball around. I look at that Cleveland highlight and it's apparent that he scares the hell out of a lot of corners. He's just flat out bigger, faster, stronger and it works even though he doesn't run good routes. If we offer him another 3M like the skins, I think the Browns offer much better. I don't know...

No. Not IMO, too much risk for another guy that may or may not work out. We've done nothing at OL or RB yet, and that is our "priority" yet crickets. If they plan to finish those areas in the draft, we are screwed another season or longer IMO.

vin.couve12 wrote:Much appreciated for the info. Your concerns seem valid. I don't know what we'd pay for this and I don't know how he would respond in this type of offense. Yes, we like to go vertical, but he'll also have to block and do all the other dirty work along with spreading the ball around. I look at that Cleveland highlight and it's apparent that he scares the hell out of a lot of corners. He's just flat out bigger, faster, stronger and it works even though he doesn't run good routes. If we offer him another 3M like the skins, I think the Browns offer much better. I don't know...

No. Not IMO, too much risk for another guy that may or may not work out. We've done nothing at OL or RB yet, and that is our "priority" yet crickets. If they plan to finish those areas in the draft, we are screwed another season or longer IMO.

Same ish. We're lacking conviction in that already just like the last two years. It's like when a dude wants to get married to a good woman so they might have a chance at happiness in the long term and then some smoking hot sloot walks by.....

vin.couve12 wrote:Much appreciated for the info. Your concerns seem valid. I don't know what we'd pay for this and I don't know how he would respond in this type of offense. Yes, we like to go vertical, but he'll also have to block and do all the other dirty work along with spreading the ball around. I look at that Cleveland highlight and it's apparent that he scares the hell out of a lot of corners. He's just flat out bigger, faster, stronger and it works even though he doesn't run good routes. If we offer him another 3M like the skins, I think the Browns offer much better. I don't know...

No. Not IMO, too much risk for another guy that may or may not work out. We've done nothing at OL or RB yet, and that is our "priority" yet crickets. If they plan to finish those areas in the draft, we are screwed another season or longer IMO.

The Thomas trade will cover the RB spot and OL with the draft picks we will get.

No. Not IMO, too much risk for another guy that may or may not work out. We've done nothing at OL or RB yet, and that is our "priority" yet crickets. If they plan to finish those areas in the draft, we are screwed another season or longer IMO.

The Thomas trade will cover the RB spot and OL with the draft picks we will get.

Provided we seek a lobotomy in the OL / RB draft room, I agree. Not saying we don't try, just saying...odds are not in our favor. I'd rather draft the areas we are better at, and sign proven talent were we aren't. Oline and RB we suck at drafting. Cable gone will help, just how much we may be forced to observe until Pete is gone.

No. Not IMO, too much risk for another guy that may or may not work out. We've done nothing at OL or RB yet, and that is our "priority" yet crickets. If they plan to finish those areas in the draft, we are screwed another season or longer IMO.

The Thomas trade will cover the RB spot and OL with the draft picks we will get.

Provided we seek a lobotomy in the OL / RB draft room, I agree. Not saying we don't try, just saying...odds are not in our favor. I'd rather draft the areas we are better at, and sign proven talent were we aren't. Oline and RB we suck at drafting. Cable gone will help, just how much we may be forced to observe until Pete is gone.

Get the ET trade done, I would love to see Isaiah Wynn & either Nick Chubb or Sony Michel. Get some winning pedigrees back in house! Just my .02

Come to think of it, if we could sign Pryor for 30%-40% of what we paid Jimmy Graham, we are coming out ahead. Pryor creates mismatch due to his size and speed, same as Graham. Pryor dropped some balls, hey not like Graham didn't. Pryor probably couldn't block, guess what? So couldn't/wouldn't Graham.

massari wrote:Pryor, Decker, Cody Latimer, Brice Butler or Mike Wallace seem like the best free agent fits remaining if they can be had for cheap and if they can't trade for Martavis Bryant.

Current depth:

BaldwinLockettBrownDarbohMooreMarcus JohnsonMcEvoyGrayson

DicksonVannettSwoopes

Darboh and Vannett probably hasn’t work out the way Pete likes if the Hawks are signing TE and WRs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Darboh was a rookie WR that actually started seeing a number of snaps last year. He probably played and was active more than Golden Tate was his rookie year with us. I would say that bodes well for his future. WR is a tough position to play early on in a career. I think they are just trying to get really competitive with the 4-6 receivers. And Vannett I believe is exactly what they thought he was. A solid number 2 TE that can start in a pinch. And with a team that is most likely going to run a ton of 2 TE sets under Shotty, that is a valuable piece. Signing Dickson doesn’t mean much as far as Vannett goes in my opinion. Under Shotty, they will need 2 good TE’s.

pcbball12 wrote:Marcus Johnson, Jaron Brown, now potentially Prior. Me thinks they are gettin back to classic Air Coryell. Guys that are vertical threats for a vertical passing attack. I like it. Develop a run game and kill teams vertically, that’s when we were at our best anyways. Get back to our roots.

Stubbornly thinking big play on most of the playaction looks was part of the problem. I'd like to see reliability of the offense improve and that comes from moving the chains, giving the O a chance to build rhythm, and getting more total plays so you can pick your spots to go deep. As much as taking most of a game to get more than a couple FGs on the board was a big problem, so was the propensity to put the D back out quickly and with at least the feeling of a small margin for error.That said, improving the ability to go downfield with speed and size helps open up everything else and makes opponents feel better about "just" giving up some first downs.

Pryor had a great camp in Washington. Then hurt his ankle in week 2 and he tried to play on it for the rest of the year. However, I read a few stories and it sounds like he didn't try to hard to rehab himself either. Anything more than $4 million for him is far too much.

SeadogEast wrote:Pryor had a great camp in Washington. Then hurt his ankle in week 2 and he tried to play on it for the rest of the year. However, I read a few stories and it sounds like he didn't try to hard to rehab himself either. Anything more than $4 million for him is far too much.

Wasn't aware of that.

I've been kind of cold on the potential signing but that gives me a little hope. Although as usual, totally depends on the $$$.

I find it difficult to understand the twisted mindset of any individual who would create a fake twitter account to spread fake news. I suppose different strokes, etc. etc.; but it's BS for anyone to do this.