"After the greetings,
Christine asks her to explain Eurabia:I didn't
invent the term. It was the title of a journal that foreshadowed the situation
today. Eurabia is an ideology that seeks to promote the fusion of the
two shores of the Mediterranean and to eradicate the identity of the European
peoples. Eurabia is two combats. One is the desire of the European Union to
extend its power. When I speak of the European Union, I mean a whole
system of functionaries who aim to abolish the European nations in order to
construct a European Empire. This is an absurdity because this empire contains
several languages, several histories, several identities, and you cannot destroy
that. It is too rich too important,it would be a terrible impoverishment. This
vision of the European Union is part of the globalist agenda to replace the
nation-states with a world government that would be the United Nations, an
international center that would promulgate laws for the entire planet. This is
very clear from the speeches of Javier Solana, from his desire to strengthen the
U.N. by weakening the European States. This is part of a humanist aspect of
Communism: they want to recreate a fraternal humanity, without borders, without
divisions, subject to the same laws, in which everyone is equal, everyone is
kind and gentle, and in which the differences between the peoples would
disappear. It's a little like what the Soviet Union wanted to
do.That is one aspect of Eurabia.
The other aspect is the union with the Arab world, the creation of a
Mediterranean civilization, which is a step towards the larger phase of
globalization. This globalization will take place as the civilization
continues to expand, leaving the domaine of nation-states, and taking in more
and more different peoples, uniting with other continents and peoples. This is
an intermediate step towards a supranational state that would mean the
destruction of Europe in order to
bring in the other nations.We find this
in the works of Carl Bildt, and other important politicians of the 70's, 80's
and 90's. We see that Eurabia has several levels, and what I studied in my book
Eurabia is another phenomenon: the destruction of Europe which is in parallel
with an historical movement - the destruction of Judeo-Christian States by
Islam. This aspect is different but complementary.It was my
specialty to study the historical texts to determine how Judeo-Christian
nations, that had no Muslims, that didn't speak Arabic or Turkish, how did these
nations, that represented the heights of civilization, such as Egypt with
Alexandria as its capital, and Byzantium, become Islamized? What were the
processes that led the people who were largely Christian to become Muslims and
begin to speak Arabic or Turkish, and also Central Europe - don't forget the
Turkish Empire went almost as far as Vienna - and Hungary and the Balkans? It
was an enormous empire. What brought about the transformation of Christian
nations?There were
two primordial levers that led to the transformation - jihad and sharia. Jihad
is an ideology. There is no equivalent in Christian civilization. It doesn't
exist. To understand jihad you have to read the Islamic texts to see the
difference. Because European colonization was not a jihad, it was completely
different. The Europeans left after one century.Now we are back in
an era of very active jihad and sharia, and now sharia, with the so-called Arab
Spring, will be applied in all Muslim countries. We are in a period of
jihad in all of its forms, some peaceful, such as immigration, such as certain
Islamic precepts and concepts that are very important, for example, what we
Westerners would call the destruction of history. For us history consists of
events that can be proven, dated, and verified by archeological evidence, or
some other kind. But in Islam, history is whatever confirms the Koran. It is
religious history, not history in the sense of Greek, Western or Cartesian
rationalism. And we are in the process of renouncing our history, our conception
of history to adopt an Islamic conception of history. Obviously this has
repercussions on our identity, on our culture, and so gradually, without
realizing it, we are entering into a process of intellectual Islamization.
Through the schools, the teaching, and this is promoted by our own State
authorities. There is also another very important element in the transformation
of Christian nations into Islamic nations, this is what I call dhimmitude, a
system of laws regulating the status of populations conquered by Islam:
Christians, Jews, and non-Muslims, and these laws established a permanent
feeling of insecurity. That is to say, these populations were protected by
Islamic law in a status of permanent insecurity, and humiliation and violence.
She describes
how Islam uses constant attacks (as in Gaza) to strike permanent fear into the
populations, who are forced to abandon their lands. Islam then moves in closer
and closer to those lands that have not been Islamized, lands that must be
conquered by war.So there is
this past of wars, conquests and slavery that is not spoken of. Islamic slavery
is religious slavery, not necessarily racial. Non-Muslims were destined for
slavery. Then there is the past history of very violent conquests,
exterminations, genocide - such as the Armenian genocide, and I believe we are a
bit responsible for the current situation, in particular our governments,
because instead of denouncing these facts as we do with Western history - we
speak of the genocide of the Jews, and all sorts of genocide that we have
committed, we speak of the massacres during the war, and of slavery. Instead of
doing this with the Muslims, on the contrary we have taken refuge in denial.
Which means that we have not allowed this people to develop self-critical
thinking and to arm themselves against a return of the past. In this respect, we
are to blame as well.Because as I write, the West is
a victim of jihad. But the victim has a duty towards his oppressor, this duty is
to bear witness. It is important for the victim to teach his oppressor about the
evil he is doing. But if the victims repeat constantly, for example to
the Palestinians, that they are wonderful, as the prelates, the heads of the
churches do in the Middle East, even though the Palestinians represent the
avant-guard of anti-Western, hence anti-Jewish jihad… You need a lot of courage,
but I understand why they do not have courage, why they cannot speak. But
perhaps in the West, the time for talking has passed. But there was a time for
words, a time for bearing witness of the suffering of the victims, for
humanizing the oppressor and for curing the oppressor. My books on dhimmitude
are the testimony of the victim. It is very important for this testimony to be
accepted and supported by the oppressor. There are Muslims who reject this past
and seek a form of modernization, in order to set the good Muslim on the path of
modernization and rejection of the past.So there is the problem of
Eurabia, which is the problem of the destruction of our civilization. In my book
I examine the mechanisms that led our nations to self-destruct and to betray
their own people. How did this happen? What collusion took place? What forces
were at play? There are of course many elements in this Titanic, this culture
and civilization that are in the process of collapsing before our
eyes.This is
Eurabia.