“Data exchange” service offers individual users metadata transfer in several different formats. Citation formats are offered for transfers in texts as for the transfer into internet pages. Citation formats include permanent links that guarantee access to cited sources. For use are commonly structured metadata schemes : Dublin Core xml and ETUB-MS xml, local adaptation of international ETD-MS scheme intended for use in academic documents.

It is well known what the scientific images and perception of globalization are like. It is clear that this phenomenon leaves no mental recourse indifferent. What is common to all theoretical approaches, in the sense of interpretation, is their perception of globalization as a dynamic and completely contradictory social process. Any contribution to the creation of a conceptual scope of definition of globalization should have a constellational merit in order to ensure "the connection of its meaning." In this work, we are primarily interested in the factual situation so that based on the located experience of living in the globalization process we could fortify our instrumentation as a unique concept of globalization reasoning. While promoting the society of knowledge, it is obvious, as Alvin Toffler testifies, that we triumphantly opened the door of the "third wave". However, this success often feeds on a blind faith in progress, which is ideologically postulated as an "excuse" for the established (pseudo) reality.
From this progressivist enthusiasm, which the coryphaei of the Western thought were so proud of, we got a grotesque twist in the post-modernity. A "treason" of identity centres has led humanity to the suppressed truth about the need for Otherness and its permanent vitality as an axiom of humanity. The key to understanding the new situation is contained exactly in the understanding of globalization and the postmodern epoch as its supervisory habitat. A diverse "exegesis" of the concept of globalization opens up a wider discourse for both a criticism and glorification of this phenomenon. It is clear that globalization has not occurred spontaneously, as confirmed by the empirical material it has provided to those theoretical schools that took it as the subject of their research. Anticipating the content of sociological concepts of globalization in the initial premises, through annotation of the most articulate points of view of this social process, we wanted to indicate the analytical "obsession with" those aspects that represent and identify its centrality, which is to say that we have considered the experiential domain of its manifestation. The foundations of those schools which due to their authenticity have potential to, by means of an objective analysis, reach a dominant model of globalization seem to base their cognitive core on the historic composition of those philosophemes and theoretical approaches, from which the logical belief in the description of the epochal condition is drawn. As we have seen, the intersection of these considerations was particularly intriguing. Our position cannot comply with one of our solutions and beliefs about a completed circle of meaning of the phenomenon we investigate. First of all, in these claims we can find a refuge for our theoretical assumptions. Based on the proposed corpus of certain hot spots in the articulated process (globalization), for the credibility of our standpoint, we have extracted those instances that are referent autonomies of impact of globalization, in order to, on the basis of such positive reduction, offer a selected framework for further theoretical and empirical research. These levels of explanation have been tested by detailed theoretical viewpoints and we have seen that what is the given of the globalization as a linking process has become a universal theme. Certain encouragement represents a "thorough review" provided by the scientific staff, who gave this topic a meaningful content and the theoretical thought a reputation of the universal presence.
Reviewing the most important sociological contributions, while distancing ourselves from the sphere of political and ideological figurations which claimed the right, at least according to the parameters of dogma, to indoctrinate views on globalization, in the end not because of a panoramic view, our intention was to, while crystallizing the sociological heritage of this phenomenon, rebuild those repressed truths that permeated and shaped the practical life of the individual and the society. One of the variations of the aforementioned history of sociological science is a distinctive instrumentation which is looking for a "face" or, as a scientific approach requires it, a sociological search for identity and globalization reasons that would justify the thesis on the existence of this phenomenon, which is at the same time an underlying thematic intention of this work. Any sociological research inevitably gets into a particularly fine-tuned analysis of power relations, or, we will briefly resort to a commonsense explanation, into the prevailing spirit of the times, which confirms the presence of globalization within the pervasive dimensions of social reality.