Executive Summary – The USA state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law. I mean REVOLUTIONARY

The State of Montana has defied the federal government and their gun laws. This will prompt a showdown between the federal government and the State of Montana. The federal government fears citizens owning guns. They try to curtail what types of guns they can own. The gun control laws all have one common goal – confiscation of privately owned firearms.

Montana has gone beyond drawing a line in the sand. They have challenged the Federal Government. The fed now either takes them on and risks them saying the federal agents have no right to violate their state gun laws and arrest the federal agents that try to enforce the federal firearms acts. This will be a world-class event to watch. Montana could go to voting for secession from the union, which is really throwing the gauntlet in Obamas face. If the federal government does nothing they lose face. Gotta love it.

Important Points – If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines. Montana has the law on their side. Since when did the USA start following their own laws especially the constitution of the USA, the very document that empowers the USA.

Silencers made in Montana and sold in Montana would be fully legal and not registered. As a note silencers were first used before the 007 movies as a device to enable one to hunt without disturbing neighbors and scaring game. They were also useful as devices to control noise when practicing so as to not disturb the neighbors.

Silencers work best with a bolt-action rifle. There is a long barrel and the chamber is closed tight so as to direct all the gases though the silencer at the tip of the barrel. Semi-auto pistols and revolvers do not really muffle the sound very well except on the silver screen. The revolvers bleed gas out with the sound all over the place. The semi-auto pistols bleed the gases out when the slide recoils back.

Silencers are maybe nice for snipers picking off enemy soldiers even though they reduce velocity but not very practical for hit men shooting pistols in crowded places. Silencers were useful tools for gun enthusiasts and hunters.

There would be no firearm registration, serial numbers, criminal records check, waiting periods or paperwork required. So in a short period of time there would be millions and millions of unregistered untraceable guns in Montana. Way to go Montana.

Discussion – Let us see what Obama does. If he hits Montana hard they will probably vote to secede from the USA. The governor of Texas has already been refusing Federal money because he does not want to agree to the conditions that go with it and he has been saying secession is a right they have as sort of a threat. Things are no longer the same with the USA. Do not be deceived by Obama acting as if all is the same, it is not.

Text of the New Law:

HOUSE BILL NO. 246
INTRODUCED BY J. BONIEK, BENNETT, BUTCHER, CURTISS, RANDALL, WARBURTON
AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 6] may be cited as the “Montana Firearms Freedom Act”.

Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 6] is the following:
(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights, as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.
(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.
(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists, as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 6], the following definitions apply:
(1) “Borders of Montana” means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.
(2) “Firearms accessories” means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.
(3) “Generic and insignificant parts” includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.
(4) “Manufactured” means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.

Section 4. Prohibitions. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.

Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:
(1) A firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;
(2) A firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;
(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Section 6. Marketing of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 6] must have the words “Made in Montana” clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.

Section 7. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 6] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 6].

Section 8. Applicability. [This act] applies to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured, as defined in [section 3], and retained in Montana after October 1, 2009.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click “Save settings” to activate your changes.
For all those thinking of moving to Montana,
On May 7th, 2009 hopefulfilled says:

here is a website of a liberty loving Ron Pauler who sells great Montana land, and his site has a video of how his place is off grid and how he did it. I know this fellow, as he is a neighbor of my son who lives there. And the land company he sells for I can vouch for, as we bought our land from them too, only in a different state.

http://wyominglandcompany…

* Login or register to post comments

AWESOME!!!! NOW WE NEED MORE
On May 7th, 2009 emptyeternity says:

AWESOME!!!!
NOW WE NEED MORE STATES TO DO THIS!

MARCH ON!!

An Eye for an Eye will ONLY make this world go blind~Ghandi~

* Login or register to post comments

Montana
On May 7th, 2009 rmsiggys says:

I’m so happy for the Great State of Montana!!

Great Work to all that made this happen!!

* Login or register to post comments

Next order of business
On May 7th, 2009 lupester says:

Would the logical next step be any business transactions between a employer and employee within state bounds not be subjected to income tax?

* Login or register to post comments

Of course they did…..
On May 7th, 2009 RS says:

…..but the Feds control the steel.

* Login or register to post comments

There’s plenty of steel to
On May 7th, 2009 rv36116 says:

There’s plenty of steel to be melted down and processed and created into whatever…

* Login or register to post comments

I’d put that at
On May 7th, 2009 riceowlex says:

about 70% of our military being aware of oaths and following the laws according to the Constitution. In other words roughly the percentage of campaign contributions received by the Dr Ron Paul Campaign. I know it’s not exact but it is something to work off of. When I think about soldiers
and the communities, I think of armed military taking guns in New Orleans after Katrina, they tried the same thing in Iowa after the flooding in 05 but the Iowans told them to F### Themselves and apparently they did. IT CAN HAPPEN IF SO IT NEEDS TO BE REBUFFD WITH PREJUDICE.

* Login or register to post comments

Give me a year…
On May 7th, 2009 casimirp says:

Until I graduate from learning medecine. I’ll happily go and tend to any free states and their wounded, should it come to violence! Go Montana! Anybody know if there are any gun manufacturers based out of Montana? I would gladly support them by buying from them.

* Login or register to post comments

Wake me up!
On May 7th, 2009 larjerr says:

I must be dreaming. What a cool state!

* Login or register to post comments

This, AND the governer is a Democrat!
On May 6th, 2009 free.alive says:

Oh, and Dan, (“are any of you… ready to lock and load and show up in Montana to lend them a hand in repelling the aggressors… or are you just going to rant and rave about liberty safely from your own abode… …talk is cheap and i think we as a nation have done enough talking to leaders and others that dont [sic] care to listen.

…Montana will be the ‘bunker hill’ of the rebirth of our REPUBLIC”)

you’d make a great agent provocateur!

* Login or register to post comments

Isn’t the issue with secession etc….
On May 6th, 2009 tstorey says:

have more to do with the amount of money the federal government gives that state and their ability to withold it.

Since 1900 the plan has been to make everyone and everything dependent on the federal government.

Is Montana relatively free of need for federal funds? What do they have 900,000 people? That is one person for every 6.5 sq miles.

Seems they have plenty of room.

Beautiful up there.

Guess I can start packing.

One poster suggested “boots on the ground” What the hell would the feds do? 147,000 sq miles?

They can’t do Iraq and what soldiers would impose unconstitutional law on their fellow Americans?

All these armed revolution scenarios have nothing to do with reality.

The soldiers won’t do it and why would a police man from another state do anything?

Federal agents? There aren’t enough federal agents to go “seize Montana” or any other state. You think there are tens of thousands of US marshals? You think they are all going to start shooting innocent Americans?

Lose the bloody revolution angle. The men in power would NEVER try it

Most of the reason for this is that the military would tell them to shove it.

You watch way too many movies. Our military are the biggest patriots of all.

* Login or register to post comments

Try
On May 7th, 2009 farmer says:

to tell that to the people in Waco or Ruby Ridge.

* Login or register to post comments

MONTANA
On May 6th, 2009 rv36116 says:

I would volunteer to help if worse comes to worse vs. the fed. Time to step up to the plate, patriots. This means being ready for what ever the time brings.

* Login or register to post comments

Shotguns not included
On May 6th, 2009 trgtc says:

Why would they exclude shotguns?

Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Last time I checked, shotguns fit this description.

.
.
Guard, protect and cherish your land, for there is no afterlife for a place that started out as Heaven – Charles M. Russell

* Login or register to post comments

full autos
On May 6th, 2009 larjerr says:

shotguns you have to pull the trigger twice to fire both rounds….an automatic like a select fire full auto AK-47 would better fit the description…imo

* Login or register to post comments

Bring allot of questions to my mind:
On May 6th, 2009 Tramp says:

If I lived in a state that enacted this, and owned things that might be against the written law in another state, could I continue to own them if I moved in to one of them. I bought them legally, I didn’t transfer to buy, sell, or transport them for commerce. This is going to be very interesting to watch.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I love my country
I am appalled by my government

* Login or register to post comments

looks like Texas has had a similar bill introduced by
On May 6th, 2009 TexaslovesRonPaul says:

Leo Berman in the House.

http://www.legis.state.tx…

* Login or register to post comments

when montana needs help
On May 6th, 2009 Dan says:

if the feds were to put US marshalls or ‘boots on the ground,’ are any of you who think that this is a great move by Montana, ready to lock and load and show up in Montana to lend them a hand in repelling the aggressors and the unconstitutional us government. or are you just going to rant and rave about liberty safely from your own abode, for if this is to play out then we must as ‘just plain folk’ that beleive in our liberty and constitution spill the blood of freedom and throw the yoke of tyranny from our necks.
talk is cheap and i think we as a nation have done enough talking to leaders and others that dont care to listen. the tea parties were the last stage of just trying to talk to them. you all see what type of impact they had , comrade peloski wants more $$$ for troops in yet another illegal war. so Montana will be ‘the mouse that roared’ or forever we will be made to toe the party line

GOD BLESS AMERICA and those that will defend her

Montana will be the ‘bunker hill’ of the rebirth of our REPUBLIC

* Login or register to post comments

I volunteer!
On May 6th, 2009 tkubic46 says:

I volunteer!

* Login or register to post comments

Awesome!
On May 6th, 2009 FatherPatriot says:

Makes me wish I lived there! Hopefully they will stick to their guns (pun intended) and stand up to the federal government’s bullying. This could motivate other states to follow in their path. It’s too bad that Illinois will likely never make a change for the better. We can’t even get a concealed carry license. Go Montana!!!

* Login or register to post comments

not sure
On May 6th, 2009 dunnowhat2use says:

but I think open carry is legal in Illinois
in rural areas anyway

http://opencarry.org/open…

* Login or register to post comments

Bravo!
On May 6th, 2009 OneWorldMafia says:

Bravo!

* Login or register to post comments

Great work Montana!
On May 6th, 2009 xenoclone says:

I really wish folks in Oregon would see the great value in this kind of move by a state. It has great implications beyond gun laws.

Chris
cascadiagames.com

* Login or register to post comments

maybe we should show them
On May 6th, 2009 dunnowhat2use says:

I just emailed all my reps. I encourage everyone to please do the same.
Show them that international treaty Obama signed http://www.oas.org/juridi…

Or this cnn report http://www.youtube.com/wa…

* Login or register to post comments

California
On May 6th, 2009 IMissLiberty says:

California has many reps in the House. They tend to overwhelm smaller populations. Of course, many of the population centers in CA are anti-gun, or at least vote for politicians who assume they are. (Residents may quietly own guns, but not advertise it.)

This makes me wonder about the relationship between Montana and the State of California. Whether they will be opposed or allied, and at which levels of government. Especially because they have “the West” in common.

The other thing that’s interesting is the commercial aspects. The potential to jump start economic activity by carving out islands of freedom is very interesting. California has chosen to have the highest sales tax, and is putting measures on the ballot May 19, to keep them high for longer. As business and boomers flee the state, so does its revenue.

This is an excellent time for states to show each other how freedom works.

IMissLiberty

* Login or register to post comments

That’s a great point. I can
On May 6th, 2009 rv36116 says:

That’s a great point. I can seriously see myself moving based on issues such as these. If Montana did something like this, I think there would be a HUGE rush for others to go there, start businesses and become a shining beacon of free market/freedom.

* Login or register to post comments

Thanks for posting this
On May 6th, 2009 Victoria says:

Thanks for posting this great news.

* Login or register to post comments

Looks like Tennessee is following Montana’s lead.
On May 6th, 2009 Kinsjon says:

Lets hope this catches on.

http://www.wztv.com/newsr…

* Login or register to post comments

That’s great
On May 6th, 2009 dunnowhat2use says:

I hope it catches on!

* Login or register to post comments

I think
On May 6th, 2009 quiltingsando says:

Montana should be the free state project.

* Login or register to post comments

YESSS !
On May 6th, 2009 death2urking18 says:

I will be in Montana next week visiting to see if I want to transfer to University of Montana.

Hopefully it all works out, haha.

* Login or register to post comments

MIzzoula is a beautiful
On May 6th, 2009 rv36116 says:

MIzzoula is a beautiful city! Lots of gambling places around the city, if I recall correctly…

* Login or register to post comments

WOW!
On May 6th, 2009 see-thru says:

go montana!

* Login or register to post comments

What book is that quote from?
On May 6th, 2009 GabrielPage says:

I recently bought a used copy of “The Kingdom of Heaven is Within You,” and I wonder if that quote comes from it. I haven’t had a chance to crack it yet.

This is directed to that post below, I just misposted it, sorry!

* Login or register to post comments

bump
On May 6th, 2009 declarationofre… says:

“There can be only one permanent revolution – a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man.”
—Tolstoy

* Login or register to post comments

This is great news.
On May 6th, 2009 Ron Aldof says:

Montana Rocks.

Hey if your from Montana? How about writing these legislators to see if they can bring the original 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution to a vote in their state house. Being the only ones to vote on it since the early 18 hundreds. It would be great if it passed and the amendment was brought into the forefront for other states to vote on.

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

This amendment never had a deadline to get ratified. It still can be ratified.

This would mean that the Bushes, Colin Powell, Bill Clinton, Al Gore etc. Who have been knighted… Would cease to be citizens of this country… Or probably denounce the title… They would have to shove it in the bi$2#!s face. Then not one of our elected officials could get gifts from the the kings and queens or any others foreign leader.

Way to go Montana!!!!!!!!

Ron Paul for POTUS 2012

* Login or register to post comments

I like this Ammendment!
On May 7th, 2009 earlydawn says:

I would certainly support this ammendment — although under the Constitution already (Article 1, Section 9) it seems clear enough to me:

“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

But apparently, that wording just isn’t strong enough.

I would also add that no one with dual citizenship should be allowed to hold public office of any kind, or even work for the Federal Government. Or better yet, prohibit dual citizenship!

* Login or register to post comments

i agree.bring it back!!!!!!!!!!!
On May 6th, 2009 Mathew4RonPaul2008 says:

“Stop paying lip service to the Constitution,and OBEY IT!”-Ron Paul

* Login or register to post comments

One of the reasons for the war of 1812
On May 6th, 2009 FreeManOnLand says:

Was to destroy that entry. As well as coax us into installing another national (central) bank.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

* Login or register to post comments

the proof is in state documents
On May 6th, 2009 Mathew4RonPaul2008 says:

“Stop paying lip service to the Constitution,and OBEY IT!”-Ron Paul

* Login or register to post comments

great stuff
On May 6th, 2009 NJforRP says:

But, what the DEA has been doing to medical marijuana in Cali will not be done by the ATF in Montana.

.

* Login or register to post comments

maybe,
On May 6th, 2009 e_goldstein says:

but it’s probably a lot easier to harass a bunch of pot smokers than it is an armed populous.

* Login or register to post comments

how bout
On May 6th, 2009 Misfit4Peace says:

a bunch of armed pot smokers

Freedom is another way to God…A corrupt government is a straight way to hell.

* Login or register to post comments

sounds good to me,
On May 6th, 2009 e_goldstein says:

but the previous poster did mention california.

Todos vamos a morir de la gripe porcina.

* Login or register to post comments

I sent a copy of the bill to my state congressman
On May 6th, 2009 meekandmild says:

trying to talk Missouri into doing the same thing.

* Login or register to post comments

I love Montana…
On May 6th, 2009 loyaltothecrazyuncle says:

*

* Login or register to post comments

I know who I’ll be cheering for
On May 6th, 2009 dunnowhat2use says:

Go Montana hope more follow suit

* Login or register to post comments

Live in Florida?
On May 6th, 2009 Zak Carter says:

We have till next January to find a few good representatives to bring this forward when the legislature next reconvenes..Live in one of the other 49? call your rep – if they are not onboard with this – find one who is!

“Let a man never stir on his road a step without his weapons of war; for unsure is the knowing when need shall arise of a spear on the way without.” – Odin

Watch the video that exposes the truth about humanity’s cruelest invention—
the factory farm.

Want fries with that? Watch Now.

Read more…

Advertise here

Advertise Conservatively on the Blogads Conservative Network

Should You Sell In May and Go Away? 5/4/2009 The fifth month of the year is here. And, for many mainstream financial players, that means folding back the dog-eared pages of the “Traders Almanac” chapter titled, “Sell In May and Go Away.” So, is it smart to follow this age-old Wall Street adage? Well, it may help to go back and see how the other, similar saws of wisdom have panned out over the last year: Read More

Dow Below 1000: Seriously? 5/1/2009 Remember all those books from the beginning of the decade about the Dow skyrocketing with titles like Dow, 30,000 by 2008 (didn’t happen) and Dow at 36,000 (hasn’t happened)? Well, Bob Prechter still has his eyes firmly fixed on a less optimistic scenario… Read More

EUR/USD: Sometimes, the Less You Say, the Better 5/6/2009 If you trade forex, you’ve probably noticed that some markets have behaved erratically in recent weeks. The EUR/USD, for example, the most widely-traded currency pair, would go sideways for days — but then start swinging wildly from hour to hour. What’s going on? Here are some thoughts on this from Jim Martens, EWI’s Senior Currency Strategist. Read More

(Video) Roadmap to SENSEX 100,000 4/9/2009 (Video) Editor of EWI’s Asian-Pacific Financial Forecast monthly market letter Mark Galasiewski talks with CNBC TV18 news anchors in India about what they call an “Elliott wave report that’s been making a lot waves recently,” including a 15-year target for India’s SENSEX that Mark says may sound “extraordinary to many people.” Read More

How Elliott Wave Analysis Helps You Find Opportunities 4/14/2009 ~Elliott wave patterns are strong indicators of the way markets will behave, and our analysts here at Elliott Wave International follow all major global markets to spot such patterns. On April 9, our European Stocks Specialty Service recognized one at a crucial price juncture and posted this intraday forecast for Switzerland’s SMI stock index…~ Read More
Get 120 Pages of FREE Charts & Analysis for Every Major World Market
Now until April 30, Elliott Wave International is offering their Global Market Perspective, free! This 120-page publication covers every major world market, global interest rates, international currencies, metals, energy, and social trends. Normally $49 per month, it’s FREE until April 30! Get It Now!
Provided By
Elliott Wave International

* New American: Ron Paul’s Influence Grows
* We have a money bomb site for Rand Paul in the works, we can not launch until he officially decides to run PLEASE READ
* Noam Chomsky on Ron Paul Supporters: Common ground can be explored
* MUST SEE VIDEO!! Pentagon Attack, Cab Driver, Lloyde England’s Virtual Confession
* What’s happening in the world—the Arkansas part
* The Case Against the Fed and Fractional Reserve Lending
* If you buy leased gold then do you own it?
* Reefer Madness: Is Marijuana Legalization a Big Government Plot?
* Looking Back on the Greatest Depression
* Abusive Power and the Culture of Obedience
* Fed Inspector General Knows Nothing About The Fed
* Let’s have a powwow. What the heck is going on in the world???
* What would be the effect on our nation if every voter read the Constitution just once?
* EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 I’m not a lawyer but I think it makes it illegal to uncover Obama’s past!
* There are No Good Arguments for Intellectual Property
* Executive Summary – The USA state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law. I mean REVOLUTIONARY.
* Glenn Beck kicks Acorn National Spokesman off show
* Ron Paul Deserves the Nobel Peace Prize
* UPDATE – HR 1207 Now Up To 134 co-sponsors!
* The Ron Paul phenomenon, Part 1: Evaluating the message

more
Recent blog posts

* Financials: Forecast? More Bull? More Bear?
* “Out of Order?” – Destruction of the Family by Judicial Fascism
* Murder on the Roads: Part I – Intersections
* H.L. Mencken Speaks
* Live Free or Die by Mark Steyn
* Bag of Weed
* John Ziegler Arrest – Update
* Control of US by IMF/World Bankers Imminent
* FBI and DHS Spied on Americans on April 15th
* Despite Pledges, Protectionism on the Rise

Locations of visitors to this page
Please take the time today to tell at least one friend about Dr. Paul, his message, why you support him, and why our country needs him now more than ever. This is a grassroots campaign. We are the grass and we are the roots. The other candidates may have more money, but Dr. Paul has something that no amount of money can buy: He has us. He has our trust, our belief, our support and our love. Let us not let Dr. Paul, nor our country down.
Site Meter

Top Ron Paul Sites .:. Ranking the best Ron Paul for President 2008 Websites

Created and paid for by Michael A. Nystrom, a concerned citizen. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED