Editor’s Note: The Obama administration has stubbornly refused to make significant accommodations to the harsh treatment of Pvt. Bradley Manning, who faces charges for allegedly leaking classified government documents to the anti-secrecy group, WikiLeaks.

Though Manning is not a violent offender (and his alleged crime would suggest he is a prisoner of conscience), he has been locked in a cell for 23 hours a day and has been subjected to forced nudity, conditions that have prompted an international outcry, as activist Kevin Zeese notes in this guest essay:

The eight months of solitary confinement of Army Pfc. Bradley Manning at the Quantico brig has drawn national and international criticism in the last week. Support is growing for him around the world with 500,000 writing President Barack Obama in the last few days and with hundreds of top U.S. legal scholars criticizing his conditions of confinement.

Lawyers representing every leading law school in the United States have written an open letter to President Obama criticizing the conditions of Manning. Among the law professors is Lawrence Tribe who was President Obama’s law professor at Harvard and served in his administration until recently.

The letter, “Private Manning’s Humiliation,” raises questions about President Obama saying: “President Obama was once a professor of constitutional law, and entered the national stage as an eloquent moral leader. The question now, however, is whether his conduct as Commander-in-Chief meets fundamental standards of decency.”

Col. Ann Wright (ret), who served 29 years in the military, noted that “President Obama could end the treatment of Manning with one phone call. As Commander-in-Chief he is responsible for the actions of the Marines at Quantico. Certainly he understands the constitutional right to be convicted before punished and that the condition of Manning violates protection from cruel and unusual punishment.”

The U.N. Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez reprimanded the United States for blocking an official visit with Manning to investigate his treatment. The U.N. torture investigator has been reviewing Manning’s case since December but the United States will not allow a private meeting with no tape recording.

The military has also refused a U.S. Congressman’s request for an official visit to Manning, Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, as well as a visit from Amnesty International.

Daniel Ellsberg, a veteran who graduated from Quantico and is noted for leaking the Pentagon Papers, commented:

“It seems likely that the Pentagon's refusal to allow Amnesty International and the U.N. Rapporteur on Torture to hold unmonitored discussion with Bradley Manning (as the U.N. mandate demands) reflects well-founded fear that such experts on abusive conditions and torture could conclude that Manning's treatment is not only ‘ridiculous, counterproductive and stupid’ -- as State Department spokesperson P.J. Crowley was forced to resign for saying -- but criminal.”

This comes at a time when the U.S. and China are challenging each other on human rights. China issued a lengthy report regarding human rights violations in the United States this week.

As P.J. Crowley, former Assistant Secretary of State, said when he resigned, the Manning case would be an embarrassment to the U.S. internationally, highlighting “the broader, even strategic impact of discreet actions undertaken by national security agencies every day and their impact on our global standing and leadership.

“The exercise of power in today’s challenging times and relentless media environment must be prudent and consistent with our laws and values.”

Five hundred thousand people have sent letters to President Obama urging him to “immediately end the torture, isolation and public humiliation of Bradley Manning.” The petition was put out by Azaaz.org and is addressed to President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.

“A half million people have taken a stand in support of Bradley Manning. It's certainly a challenge to President Obama to get on the right side of history here and finally put an end to the extreme and illegal pre-trial punishment,” said Jeff Paterson, a veteran speaking on behalf of the Bradley Manning Support Network.

“After he ends the mistreatment of Manning, he could then ensure that Bradley receives the fair and public trial that is guaranteed under the Constitution.”

To comment at Consortiumblog, click here. (To make a blog comment about this or other stories, you can use your normal e-mail address and password. Ignore the prompt for a Google account.) To comment to us by e-mail, click here. To donate so we can continue reporting and publishing stories like the one you just read, click here.

Consortiumnews.com
is a product of The Consortium for Independent Journalism, Inc., a non-profit organization
that relies on donations from its readers to produce these stories and keep alive this Web
publication.