The Polanski Tate Murders 1969

It baffles me why truthseekers have let Polanski off the hook for the 1969 murder of his adulterous wife Sharon Tate. The case against the late Charles Manson is non existent. My two year old thread on this subject on another forum has just been deleted. I will attempt to recreate it here.

Sharon Tate and four others were found dead at a house rented by Polanski and Tate in Beverly Hills California in 1969. The cops couldn't (or wouldn't) find someone to pin the crime on till 4 months after the crime. They then charged Charles Manson, a hippy who lived some distance away and some of his followers.

Sharon Tate was eight months pregnant when she and 4 others were murdered in August 1969. Sharon smoked both pot and tobacco during her pregnancy. She had sex with actor Christopher Jones during her pregnancy. There has been speculation that the father of the child was former lover Jay Sebring to whom she was still close. In any case Polanski wanted the foetus aborted and put pressure on Sharon. She refused.

My argument is that Polanski arranged for the murders. He couldn't have done them himself as he was in London at the time. He had contacts that could have arranged the murders. Bob Evans for instance. Evans was the head of Paramount or some other Hollywood studio and had lots of mob contacts. Evans was a Chosen Person. Another fact that raises suspicion is that Polanski kept delaying his return to LA despite Tate's appeals. Odd behaviour for someone expecting his first child. Interestingly Bob Evans claimed that he had been invited to dinner at the Polanski's on the fateful night but couldn't make it thus avoiding being murdered himself.

Christopher Jones was a rising star in 1969. After the murders he was allowed to complete his role in the movie Ryan's Daughter . He then disappeared from the scene. He resurfaced decades later and described his affair with Sharon Tate in Rome in 1969 when she was pregnant with Polanski's (?) child. Obviously his indiscretion with the wife of a powerful director cost him his career.

In 1969 there was widespread suspicion that Polanski had engineered the murders. How amazing that that suspicion has evaporated in the intervening years ! Propaganda is powerful. Unprincipled people like prosecutor Vince Bugliosi helped. Manson's "defence" did nothing . They did not call a single witness of their own. Their cross examination of the prosecution's witnesses was feeble and they did not ask the questions that Manson wanted them to ask. One of Manson's lawyers was found dead during the trial.

Charles Manson was not allowed to defend himself. After the trial the crooked prosecutor Vince Bugliosi wrote a book called Helter Skelter which gave a false picture of the whole episode. Bugliosi later wrote another crooked book defending the official JFK murder story. That book was called Reclaiming History. Helter Skelter helped by Chewish publishers and publicists and reviewers sold millions of copies.

I don't think there was a shred of real evidence to connect Manson and his followers to the crimes. One piece of flimsy evidence was from a fellow that lived close to the Polanski residence in a narrow cul de sac. He alleged that one of Manson's followers , a chap called Tex and some other followers came to his house in the middle of the night to use his garden hose. Implying that they were washing blood off their bodies and clothes. What is of extreme suspicion is that this witness came forward months after the crime. I think he was Chewish. What are the chances that you wouldn't report this unusual incident when one of the most sensational crimes of the decade had occurred on that very night a short distance away ?

The follower alleged to have committed most of the mayhem was Tex Watson. The garden hose fellow was Rudolf Weber (possibly Chewish). There were no streetlights on his street. How Tex Watson found a garden hose on a dark cul de sac is anyone's guess.

Crooked prosecutor Bugliosi's case hinged on the testimony of Linda Kasabian, one of the accused who was coerced into testifying against Manson and the others in exchange for immunity. They tried this with another accused Susan Atkins but Susan later repudiated her "confession" and refused to cooperate with the prosecution. Kasabian was on the witness stand for 18 days.

So that is how "justice" works. Round up some powerless vagrants. Charge them with a heinous crime. Then use a carrot and gas chamber approach to induce "confessions" and the accusation of the others. The carrot being immunity from prosecution. Works every time. The trial cost a million dollars in 1969 money. 50 million in todays worthless currency. By the time of the trial Polanski was far away in Gstaad, Switzerland having sex with schoolgirls he lured from the exclusive Rosey finishing school. The Chosen are so far above the goyim.

A funny parody of a typically crooked Life magazine cover with a demonising image of Manson. I think Manson used this as an album cover. He had associations with the Beach Boys and other well known musicians.

This is a photograph of Jay Sebring photographing a pregnant Sharon Tate at the rented house on Cielo Drive in Beverly hills where both were murdered on August 08, 1969. I don't know who took the photograph. Jay Sebring was Sharon's former lover and was still close to her. There is suspicion that he fathered the child. He was Chewish and a hairdresser to Hollywood stars.

The only person who survived on the premises was a 19 year old houseboy named William Garretson. He was arrested by police the next morning. He claimed he heard nothing during the night.The neighbours also heard nothing. This is strange given that several shots were fired and that the victims were alleged to have screamed. Could the whole thing have been staged and the "victims" given alternative identities ? There is a colour photograph of the dead Sharon Tate and there is a smile on her face. Staged ?

Most likely it was a professional mob hit with silenced guns and quick deaths for the victims that were stabbed. Amber coloured glasses were found on the premises and details of the prescription were transmitted to opticians across several states.Someone did actually order glasses but did not collect them. Did the corrupt LAPD follow the lead vigorously ? Unlikely.