28 Responses to Advances In Technology Give Scientists The Proof They Are Looking For

Percival Lowell’s ‘canals on Mars’ and the belief in the Martians who constructed them lived 49 years longer than he did. It wasn’t until Mariner 4 in 1965 photographed craters on Mars and no canals were observed that Lowell’s conjecture was finally disproved.

Let’s hope someone puts a stake through the heart of the global warming conjecture in a rather shorter timescale.

Tony is giving you a tool to do so. Use it. You will see UHI and station corruption, past weather extremes greater than present ones,…
The warmunist meme will not suddenly collapse. It has to be beaten down over time with multiple refutations of its salient beliefs. Some suggestions:
Manufactured surface warming that provably cooled the past (and sometimes warmed the present, aka karlization (now under Congressional investigation). Divergence of surface post homogenized warming from 4 radiosonde and 3 satellite estimates of global temperature. (Don’t take our word. Slide 20 of the Karl from NOAA NCEI and Schmidt from NASA GISS press conference 20 Jan 2016). No warming in this century. No SLR acceleration. No increase in weather extremes: tornados down, tropical storms down. Polar bears do NOT depend on late summer ice. Renewables are impossibly intermittent. Greening thanks to CO2 fertilization, even in former warmunist poster child the Sahel (example and references in essay Carbon Pollution?). And so forth.
Tony writes software and blogs as his contributions to this battle. I wrote ebooks as mine.

Who lives by the superdelegate dies by….
This is not the first time. I believe someone informed me in 2008 that Clinton had actually won a majority of delegates in the popular voting process. BHO cornered the superdelegates through his anointing by the corrupt insiders of the Dems. Now, guess who’s using the insider technique?

“Divergence of surface post homogenized warming from 4 radiosonde and 3 satellite estimates of global temperature”
=========================================================
Please name them. I was only aware of three.

Billy Liar said at 10:23 pm
Let’s hope someone puts a stake through the heart of the global warming conjecture in a rather shorter timescale.
I hope to live long enough to see that, but I get more pessimistic every day. I’ve realized that an annual $3 Billion is being spent to keep the monster alive and well. Money does talk. I am reminded of President Eisenhower’s observation as he said in his farewell address in 1961:

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.

The people pushing this agenda want a week economy that produces plenty of poor people dependent on government handouts in return for their vote. The tipping point, to use a well worn phrase, will be when those on the government dole become numerous enough to swing the elections. At that point, a vicious circle will form that only a revolution will break.

Hwy Andy! I don’t think it is fair to compare Lowell and Mann. Lowell was wrong about the canals, but as far as I know he was sincere in his error. Equally importantly, he spent his own money on his research, and never demanded that other people believe him or pay his way.

Lowell had data derived from observations, an interpretation, and elaborated on it. In other words, he had a falsifiable theory. However goofy (yes, in retrospect), it was science.
Michael Mann, et al ad nauseum are in defiance of science in that anything that goes against their hypothesis (which is weak to begin with) is explained away or chalked up not to refutation but to evil-doers operating beyond their poor powers to refute.
Lowell comes out like an over-imaginative interpreter, the AGW crowd come out like sheer charlatans.

The basic problem anyone who tries to use logic and facts with the public to counter what is presented as “science”, is that our education system has now for many decades made no attempt to teach students how to reason and think critically. At least two generations have been taught to accept what the government says is fact, aided and abetted by a willing media that has abandoned any pretense of exercising what once was regarded as the responsibilities of objective journalism. As a result, we have great public support for global “climate change”, federally subsidized wind & solar power as the panacea for our energy “crisis”, and the nonsense that the ethanol program (subsidized, of course, and environmentally unsound) is essential component for US energy independence. And this cannot even begin to change as long as the federal government liberal wing has any influence over our national education.

Rubbish, the US is full of tin hat wearing people who believe you never landed on the moon, that 9/11 was done by the CIA etc etc.
You’re one of them obviously. The national education system being ruined by commies.
yeah right.
Andy

Advances in tech are quite meaningless if the real results are never reported. The Left Stream Media is on an Orwellian Crusade to make Safe the information consumed by the unwashed masses… Twitter and Google are the big ones, but smaller ministry of Truther’s are falling into line behind them. This from Alberta where by a freak vote split elected the Communist NDP.
They actually had armed Sheriffs escort journalists who dared to criticize Dear Leader, out of the press gallery.http://www.therebel.media/one_year_anniversary_we_re_under_attack