@robertsozolins in short, X Cloud and X Core are focused on being used by the mass-market, thus being able to properly compete with Sync, Tresorit, pCloud, AWS S3 (soon) etc. Storj, Sia etc are too complex too use and have too many bugs to be considered decent enough to be comparable to currently massively adopted services. More info here: https://medium.com/internxt/inte...
PS. X Core stable's version is already live. X Cloud's stable version will launch in a couple weeks!

@fvsegarra after reading this article it seems that the only real difference that you are bringing to the market is better usability via improved user experience, not the technology itself? Also, most other decentralised storage solutions that you compete with are open-sourced. Is that the case with X Core? What is going to be your pricing in terms of storage and/or bandwidth?

@robertsozolins our main differentiating factors with Storj, Sia & co are usability and how well polished & ready to market the tech is. Absolutely all our code is open-source :) https://github.com/Internxt Finally, monthly X Core payouts depend on data stored (70%) and INXT held (30%, but not required to get paid). Bandwidth, Uptime etc are already plugged in the data stored variable, since our network chooses nodes to store data based on many of those other variables. On average, though, you can expect around $0,02 per used GB by the network per month.

@austin_federa it takes a few days until the network starts sending you data. It sends you data once it recognises you as a node that's good enough to receive it. If you still don't have any allocated data in a few days from now, do please let us know though! <3