For. If I was being picky, I'd ask where the pee review was for the self nom. But as I saw this before, had every intention of nomming it sometime, and then completely forgot, how 'bout we pretend this is my nom and not worry about that requirement this time? Besides, the queue is a little low, and this is quality. --UU - natter08:41, Jul 21

for And pee review (Christ! What have I done with this year?) in fact there was another, so she's well within rights to re-nom. Also I still like this article. Orian57Talk12:30 21 July 2009

Fair point. I didn't check that far back - got bored looking. The vote still stands though, as does the fact that I was totally going to nom this myself one day. --UU - natter12:33, Jul 21

Also the first one is on the talk page, where they're meant to go. So what's your excuse now? Orian57Talk14:52 21 July 2009