The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) has ruled that a local council acted unlawfully in spying repeatedly on parents suspected of lying about where they lived in order to get their child into a sought after school. The ruling may not, however, prevent local authorities from spying on families for similar reasons in the future.

The law did not permit a declaration that a marriage between a man and a transsexual born male but who had had irreversible surgery was valid and subsisting. This was a matter for Parliament and not for the courts

The lack of recognition of a relationship between a child and his father whose death had predated the child's birth did not breach the child's right to family life but did discriminate against him contrary to Article 14

An inheritance dispute was question of evidence going to the issue of whether family-law ties between the applicant and the deceased should be recognized by the local courts and did not involve central questions under the right to family life for the Court to determine.

The rule of forensic immunity which protected barristers and solicitor advocates from negligence actions taken in respect of their courtroom conduct was no longer justified in the modern legal environment

An order in ancillary relief proceeding to disclose assets does not amount to an interference with a property right under Article 1 Protocol 1, and any interference with the parties' privacy rights is justified in the interests of the rights of the other party

The rule in the Divorce and Matrimonial Proceedings Act that a petitioner is not entitled to rely on their unlawful residence in the UK in order to invoke the court's jurisdiction is a rule of public policy which must be set aside if ancillary relief or divorce proceedings are already under way, otherwise it would breach the parties' implied right of access to court under Article 6 of the Convention.