Research shows Uganda needs to improve implementation of good policies to protect children of prisoners

Diva Mukisa, Foundation for Human Rights Initiative1st December 2015

What happens to children in Uganda when their parents or caregivers are imprisoned? Who are they? How many are they? Where do they live? Are they still be able to attend school? Who cares for them in the absence of their parents? Does the criminal justice system take their existence into account when sentencing their parents? What happens if the community stigmatizes them because of their parents’ crimes? These are some of the questions that PRI and FHRI sought to answer in August 2015 when they embarked on research on children of imprisoned parents and the extent to which the ACERWC General Comment 1 on this issue was being implemented in Uganda.

When parents and other primary caregivers are arrested and sent to prison in Uganda (and many other parts of the world), very little is known or recorded about what becomes of their children especially those who do not accompany their mothers in prison. Even though the Ugandan NGO, Wells of Hope, estimates that 200,000 children in Uganda have a parent in prison at any one time, there are no precise figures about how many children are affected by parental imprisonment nor how it affects them. In July 2015 there were 45,314 people in prison in Uganda, 2,039 of whom were women, and much as we do not know how many of these prisoners had children, nor much about their lives, it is reasonable to assume that a very large proportion of these prisoners were parents or primary caregivers to at least one child and most likely four or five.

Article 30 of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child highlights directly how the rights of children are affected when their primary caregivers are caught up in the criminal justice system. In November 2013, the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child adopted General Comment No. 1, Children of Incarcerated and Imprisoned Parents and Primary Caregivers. This General Comment defines States Parties’ obligations to respect, protect and fulfill the rights of this overlooked group of children. Including reviewing sentencing procedure so that a non-custodial sentence is always considered when parents/ primary caregivers are being sentenced, ensuring appropriate alternative care for these children, setting up special institutions for children accompanying their mothers in prisons and regular contact with affected children and their parents in prison.

The research conducted by FHRI and PRI in the summer of 2015, involved a document review as well as interviews and focus group discussions with those engaged in working with children of imprisoned parents such as social workers, lawyers, paralegals, prison monitors and prison guards. It also involved interviews with 15 affected children aged 10-16 years old living with the NGO Family of Africa and 11 mothers in prison

The children involved in the research had experienced stigma and discrimination from their communities because their parents had committed crimes and were in prison.

“When I was arrested and sentenced my relatives including my young daughter received threats from their neighbours. Since I was the bread winner my child does not go to school anymore and she has been bullied by children in the neighborhood.” 21-year old-Sarah

The findings from the research in Uganda also showed that the child protection system in Uganda is extensive on paper but under-resourced and provision of alternative care for this group of children is patchy; pre-trial detention is still over-used meaning that children are left without parental care unnecessarily; the Sentencing Guidelines adopted in 2013 are excellent but are not properly implemented so an offender’s care-giving status is not always taken into account at the point of sentencing.

There is an urgent need to address the stigma and discrimination that these children face, and to establish a comprehensive child protection system to provide alternative care and protection. We hope that similar research will be conducted in other States Parties so that General Comment No.1 will become more widely known and implemented, so that this group of children will become visible on the agenda of law and policy-makers.

About the author

Diva Mukisa is Programme Officer at FHRI. She leads FHRI’s work with PRI on the UN Bangkok Rules on the treatment of women prisoners in Uganda and works on juvenile justice issues. She coordinated this research on behalf of FHRI.

Related resource

Children of prisoners in Uganda and across Africa face severe disadvantages because of their parents' imprisonment. This research assesses how far Uganda has implemented a key new regional standard protecting their rights.

PRI is a non-profit association, registered in the Netherlands (Registration no 40025979)

Stay updated

Languages

Some content on this site is in one of the 12 other languages that we operate and many publications have been translated. You can use filters throughout the site or use Google’s tool for basic translations.