This image is an overexposed 44x
enlargement of Lunar Orbiter frame LO-III-84-M. Taken with
the medium resolution camera at a distance of at least 250 miles, it
shows an object dubbed by Hoagland the "Shard".
The star-like object above the "Shard" is a camera
registration mark.

The "Shard" has a shadow cast in
the correct direction for it to be a real object on the Moon and is
aligned with the local vertical rather than the grain of the film,
decreasing the chance it is an emulsion abnormality.

Close-ups reveal a cellular-like
internal structure. Above and behind the "Shard" is the "Tower",
a massive 7 mile high structure with a central "cube" suspended by a
tripod like base. Enhancements of the "Tower" show a similar
cellular construction to the "Shard", but with a distinctly
hexagonal pattern.

Close-up of the
"Shard"

Poor resolution images like this one of
the "Shard" have led some to conclude it is an ephemeral "outgassing"
event. However, the Enterprise Mission enhancements reveal no
"spray" or splatter which would be consistent with such a
conclusion. The object appears to be solid , though badly battered
by meteors.

The Castle

This extraordinary object comes from
AS10-32-4822, an Apollo hand held Hasselblad photo. The "Castle"
is extremely bright and plainly visible at normal magnification,
making it nearly impossible for the astronaut taking the picture to
have missed it.

This UNENHANCED version of it
shows the remarkable stacking of it's segments and belies a natural
explanation, especially when you consider it is hanging several
miles high in the Lunar sky.

EM enhancements show a supporting
structure, including a drooping cable passing through the tip, like
a suspension bridge.

"Los Angeles"

This large area near the crater Ukert
is strikingly rectilinear and has a very distinct and unnatural
looking boundary.

The "Shard" was the first object
spotted by Hoagland on frame LO-III-84M.

Sticking some
1.5 miles above the Lunar surface, it is truly an inexplicable (by
current theories) wonder of the universe. Casting a shadow across
the Lunar plane, alignment with the local vertical rather than the
"grain" of the film, and it's proximity to the "Tower" all argue
strongly for it's artificial origin.

Although no cross-confirming images of
the "Shard" have been found, it's vicinity to the "Tower",
which has been cross-confirmed, is a factor favoring it's existence
as a "real" object. It has been suggested that the "Shard"
may be a transient "out gassing" event.

While this cannot be
totally discounted, the absence of any "spray" around the "Shard's"
sharply defined edges work against this explanation.

The Shard in close-up

This highly enhanced close-up of the tip
of the "Shard" displays characteristics of a cellular,
regular and geometric construction.

The absence of any spray tends
to diminish the "outgassing" theory, and the presence of a
comparable glass like haze on the horizon behind "Shard" argues that
it is amongst a field of artificial structures.

The "Tower" from LO-III-84M
is easily the most stunning and convincing artifact presented so far
by Hoagland. Stretching some 7 miles above the Lunar surface,
this enigmatic object defies all natural explanation. The supporting
tripodal structure is clearly evident in these Enterprise Mission
enhancements, as is the stunning "Cube", the top of the
Tower.

The overlapping, multi-layered
reflective glass-like panes are evident in this close up of the "Cube".
Note also the symmetrical geometry of the object and the odd whips
highly reflective material around it.

The "Tower" is also cross confirmed in several other frames
taken years later on a different mission, with a different camera
and film ...

This image, AS10-32-4856 shows
the "Tower" from some 45 degrees to the side of LO-III-84M.
The same multi-paned internal geometry is evident, as is the
geometric "haze" rising from the surface.

These two frames
constitute proof that the "Tower" is a real Lunar feature and
not a photographic defect.

This enigmatic object from frame
AS10-32-4822 is literally hanging some seven miles above the
Lunar surface.

This side by side comparison is from 2 different
versions of the same Apollo 10 photographic frame, one obtained by Hoagland and the other by another researcher. In fact,
Hoagland has now identified some nine versions of this photo
in various archives around the world. Evidently part of "power
winder" sequence of photo's taken by the Astronauts, this allows
for positive verification of the reality of this object.

Not only does the "Castle" change
position relative to the spacecraft - exactly as a real suspended
object would - strange, glass-like "panes" evidently pass between
the spacecraft and the "Castle".

This is strong confirmation of a "glass"
dome in the Sinus Medii region of the Moon. Note also in
the enhanced image on the right a "cable" passing thru the tip of
the "Castle". It droops under the weight of this object, precisely
as a real suspension cable would. The unenhanced version on the left
corroborates the cellular structure of the "Castle".

These close-ups show the highly anomalous and clearly constructed
aspects of the "Castle's" composition ...

This area, roughly the size of the
Los Angeles basin, displays a highly anomalous rectilinear
pattern across the Lunar landscape. The arrangement is reminiscent
of a ruined city, and close-up views reveal a variety of
unexplainable features.

Among them are the "paperclip", the "crystal
palace" and what Hoagland calls "Arcology Row",
the deep carved linear pattern across the mountains in the
foreground.

The "paperclip" appears to be
mounted on a shaft or pole and may be some sort of antenna
assembly. Clearly, this cannot be a natural object if current Lunar
geologic theories are correct. Given the scale of frame 4822,
this object is immense, literally a sky scraper among the ruins.

The "crystal palace" is an
enormous (on the order of several miles), glass like, highly
reflective structure hanging over a valley in the "LA" mountain
chain. It's internal configuration evokes a multi-paned, layered
glass like composition.

Hoagland has compared this to the
shattered remnants of an "arcology", a formerly contained
enclosure similar to the recent earth bound "Biosphere" experiments.

This is the original image from a North
American Lunar atlas that caught Hoagland's eye.

Taken from the
ground based Lick observatory, the crater Ukert is virtually
dead center in the Lunar disk from an Earthbound perspective,
and it's dark floor is a nearly perfect 16 mile equilateral
triangle at full Moon. Imagery from the Clementine Lunar Image
Browser ......

..... And raw Clementine low res UV-VIS
images ....

.... confirm the basic triangular
shape of this crater. It should be noted that Ukert is
not a natural looking feature in any way, and it is difficult to
imagine how it could have achieved this shape due to a meteoric
impact.

Even an "impact-collapse" scenario would not likely
create a triangular configuration.

High res images from Clementine
would help resolve issues of artificiality, but the matching hi-res
pictures are mysteriously blacked out on the various Clem file
servers. This is a common occurrence concerning features of interest
to this investigation.