Koch Industries, the international conglomerate owned by Charles and David Koch, is not only the second largest private company in America, it is the most politically active. As ThinkProgress has carefully documented over the last three years, Koch groups have spent tens of millions to influence government policy — fromfinancingthe Tea Parties, to fundingjunk academicstudies, to undisclosedattack adsagainst Democrats, togroupspromoting climate change denial, to a large network of state-based and national think tanks. In anopinion columnfor the Wall Street Journal today, Koch Industries CEO Charles Koch fired back at his critics, who have grown more vocal as it has become clear that Koch groups are providing the political muscle for Gov. Scott Walker’s (R-WI) union-busting power grab.

In his piece, Charles portrays himself as simply an ideological advocate, and says his money to political groups is only meant to “enhance true economic freedom.” He chides special interests that have “successfully lobbied for special favors,” claiming “crony capitalism is much easier than competing in an open market.” But in reality, the focus of the Koch political machine is geared towards “crony capitalism” — corrupting government to make Charles and his brother David Koch richer. Koch’s Tea Party libertarianism is actually a thin veneer for the company’s long running history of winning special deals from the government and manipulating the market to pad Koch profits:

– Thedirty secretof Koch Industries is its birth under the centrally-planned Soviet Union.Fred Koch, the founder of the company and father of David and Charles, helped constructfifteen oil refineriesfor Joseph Stalin before expanding the business in the United States.

– As Yasha Levine hasreported,Koch exploits a number of government programs for profit. For instance, Georgia Pacific, a timber company subsidiary of Koch Industries, uses taxpayer money provided by the U.S. Forestry Service to provide their loggers with taxpayer-funded roads and access to virgin growth forests. “Logging companies such as Georgia-Pacific strip lands bare, destroy vast acreages and pay only a small fee to the federal government in proportion to what they take from the public,”accordingto the Institute for Public Accuracy. Levine alsonotesthat Koch’s cattle ranching company, Matador Cattle Company, uses a New Deal program to profit off federal land for free.

–Koch Industries won massive government contracts using their close relationship with the Bush administration. The Bush administration, in a deal even conservativesallegedwas a quid pro quo because of Koch’s campaign donations, handed Koch Industries alucrative contractto supply the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve with 8 million barrels of crude oil. The SPR deal, done initially in 2002, wasrenewedin 2004 by Bush administration officials. During the occupation of Iraq, Koch wonsignificant contractsto buy Iraqi crude oil.

– The Koch brothers have claimed that they oppose government intervention in the market, but Koch Industries lobbies aggressively for taxpayer handouts. In Alaska, blogger Andrew Halcroreportedthat a Koch subsidiary in Fairbanksasked Gov. Sarah Palin’s administration to use taxpayer money to bail out one of their failing refinery.

– SolveClimate recentlyreportedthat Koch Industries will reap huge profits from the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, which runs from Koch-owned tar sands mining centers in Canada to Koch-owned refineries in Texas.To build the pipeline, politicians throughout the Midwest, many of whom have received large Koch campaign donations, have usedeminant domain— government seizures of private land.In Kansas, where Koch-funded officials advise Gov. Sam Brownback (R-KS) and the Republican legislature, the Keystone XL Pipeline is likely to receive a property tax exemption of ten years, aspecial loopholethat will cost Kansas taxpayers about $50 million.

– Koch Industries has been the recipient of about$85 millionin federal government contracts mostly from the Department of Defense.Koch also benefits directly from billions in taxpayer subsidies for oil companies and ethanol production.

Charles has compared himself to a libertarian “Martin Luther,” evangelizing to the world for their supply side cause. However, the tens of millions in campaign donations and the dozens of front groups funded by Koch work in tandem to promoting the business interests of Koch Industries.

Koch funds bothsociallyconservativegroups and socially liberal groups. However, Koch’s financing of front groups and political organizations all have one thing in common: every single Koch group attacks workers’ rights, promotes deregulation, and argues for radical supply side economics. Not only do the Koch’s front groups pad Koch Industries’ bottom line, they supply the Koch brother’s talking points. In fact, for his opinion piece today, Charles heavily relied on front groups he finances for statistics. The “freedom index” cited by Charles is a creation of theKoch-fundedHeritage Foundation, and theerroneous“unfunded liabilities” claim wassuppliedby theKoch-fundedNational Center for Policy Analysis.

Koch Industries, the international conglomerate owned by Charles and David Koch, is not only the second largest private company in America, it is the most politically active. As ThinkProgress has carefully documented over the last three years, Koch groups have spent tens of millions to influence government policy — fromfinancingthe Tea Parties, to fundingjunk academicstudies, to undisclosedattack adsagainst Democrats, togroupspromoting climate change denial, to a large network of state-based and national think tanks. In anopinion columnfor the Wall Street Journal today, Koch Industries CEO Charles Koch fired back at his critics, who have grown more vocal as it has become clear that Koch groups are providing the political muscle for Gov. Scott Walker’s (R-WI) union-busting power grab.

In his piece, Charles portrays himself as simply an ideological advocate, and says his money to political groups is only meant to “enhance true economic freedom.” He chides special interests that have “successfully lobbied for special favors,” claiming “crony capitalism is much easier than competing in an open market.” But in reality, the focus of the Koch political machine is geared towards “crony capitalism” — corrupting government to make Charles and his brother David Koch richer. Koch’s Tea Party libertarianism is actually a thin veneer for the company’s long running history of winning special deals from the government and manipulating the market to pad Koch profits:

– Thedirty secretof Koch Industries is its birth under the centrally-planned Soviet Union.Fred Koch, the founder of the company and father of David and Charles, helped constructfifteen oil refineriesfor Joseph Stalin before expanding the business in the United States.

– As Yasha Levine hasreported,Koch exploits a number of government programs for profit. For instance, Georgia Pacific, a timber company subsidiary of Koch Industries, uses taxpayer money provided by the U.S. Forestry Service to provide their loggers with taxpayer-funded roads and access to virgin growth forests. “Logging companies such as Georgia-Pacific strip lands bare, destroy vast acreages and pay only a small fee to the federal government in proportion to what they take from the public,”accordingto the Institute for Public Accuracy. Levine alsonotesthat Koch’s cattle ranching company, Matador Cattle Company, uses a New Deal program to profit off federal land for free.

–Koch Industries won massive government contracts using their close relationship with the Bush administration. The Bush administration, in a deal even conservativesallegedwas a quid pro quo because of Koch’s campaign donations, handed Koch Industries alucrative contractto supply the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve with 8 million barrels of crude oil. The SPR deal, done initially in 2002, wasrenewedin 2004 by Bush administration officials. During the occupation of Iraq, Koch wonsignificant contractsto buy Iraqi crude oil.

– The Koch brothers have claimed that they oppose government intervention in the market, but Koch Industries lobbies aggressively for taxpayer handouts. In Alaska, blogger Andrew Halcroreportedthat a Koch subsidiary in Fairbanksasked Gov. Sarah Palin’s administration to use taxpayer money to bail out one of their failing refinery.

– SolveClimate recentlyreportedthat Koch Industries will reap huge profits from the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, which runs from Koch-owned tar sands mining centers in Canada to Koch-owned refineries in Texas.To build the pipeline, politicians throughout the Midwest, many of whom have received large Koch campaign donations, have usedeminant domain— government seizures of private land.In Kansas, where Koch-funded officials advise Gov. Sam Brownback (R-KS) and the Republican legislature, the Keystone XL Pipeline is likely to receive a property tax exemption of ten years, aspecial loopholethat will cost Kansas taxpayers about $50 million.

– Koch Industries has been the recipient of about$85 millionin federal government contracts mostly from the Department of Defense.Koch also benefits directly from billions in taxpayer subsidies for oil companies and ethanol production.

Charles has compared himself to a libertarian “Martin Luther,” evangelizing to the world for their supply side cause. However, the tens of millions in campaign donations and the dozens of front groups funded by Koch work in tandem to promoting the business interests of Koch Industries.

Koch funds bothsociallyconservativegroups and socially liberal groups. However, Koch’s financing of front groups and political organizations all have one thing in common: every single Koch group attacks workers’ rights, promotes deregulation, and argues for radical supply side economics. Not only do the Koch’s front groups pad Koch Industries’ bottom line, they supply the Koch brother’s talking points. In fact, for his opinion piece today, Charles heavily relied on front groups he finances for statistics. The “freedom index” cited by Charles is a creation of theKoch-fundedHeritage Foundation, and theerroneous“unfunded liabilities” claim wassuppliedby theKoch-fundedNational Center for Policy Analysis.