North Korean Missiles; Sanctions Against Iran; Is America Out of Order?

>

The problem in this world today is that we have an anarchistic chaos of political groups and institutions; each one a law unto themselves. Consequently, some countries, America for example, assumes the role of Billy Big Bollocks, and takes it on itself to dictate what other countries can or cannot do, or who may be in control of them. This makes other governments nervous of America and drives them to establish a deterring arsenal of weapons in order to secure themselves and their positions. This is creating a lot of tension in the world, of which the situation with North Korea is a prime example.

The question must be asked: How can one country, with an arsenal of thousands of nuclear weapons, assert that other countries, eg, North Korea and Iran, cannot have any? Countries can either have nuclear weapons or they cannot. One rule for all, not one rule for one country and another rule for everyone else.

The system of international defence and control that is proposed in this website, does away both with the need for any nation to take on the role of being Billy Big Bollocks and protects any other nation from such arrogance.

We
believe that within this website lies the only solution to the
creation of World Peace

So far, nobody
has shown us to the contrary

You may not have time to read
all this website in one go. Why not save it to file or add it to
favourites?

No-onecan
solve all the world's problems. To try would be to dissipate one's
energies and achieve nothing. The best thing we can do is to focus
all our efforts and attention on just one problem and hope our
endeavours will make a difference to it. That immediately creates
the dilemma of which particular problem to solve. It may be a matter
of personal preference, or it may be a matter of perceived priority.
Given that the best way to solve a large number of problems is to
solve one at a time, which one of the following major
international problems would you choose to resolve
first?

Global warming

Natural disasters

International terrorism

Deforestation

Endangered species

Pollution

Poverty

Child exploitation

Contaminated drinking water

Illegal drug production

Oppression of women

Famine

Overpopulation

Energy crisis

Economic Crisis

World health problems

It's not an easy choice to make is
it? The difficult thing about it is that by selecting one option
the others are left neglected and unresolved. The one thing that
all these problems have in common is that the more money,
resources and manpower you allocate to them the greater
improvement you are likely to effect as a result.

Now let us consider another world
problem: international conflict and the escalation of arms. This
problem is converse to the others in that the more money,
resources and manpower you allocate to it the WORSE it
gets:- one side engages ten thousand men in battle so the other
side engages fifteen; one side spends two million on weapons of
mass destruction so the other side spends three. The more armies
and weapons there are the more dangerous the world is, and it all
has the potential of going up in smoke and achieving nothing
except destruction!

If the problem of potential conflict
could be resolved to the extent that all this spending on arms and
manpower was no longer necessary, then not only would some of the
other problems be prevented from happening in the first place, but
also all the money, manpower and other resources allocated to (so
called) defence would then be freed up and made potentially
available to any number of the other world problems we have been
talking about.

Click
here for:

Therefore our submission is that
given any person can only really devote their attention to solving
one major problem in the world, then the preferential choice for
that problem should be to attend to the matter of international
conflict and world peace, because of the beneficial effect on all
the other world problems. That certainly is our choice, and we
hope that a sufficient number of people reading this will agree
with us:

I agree that world peace should be
the issue of priority to deal with (proceed).

I prefer to devote my attention to
solving one of the other important issues (exit).

There are eight more pages of text before you get to
the active part of this website