New Scientist Prize For Science Writing

The SA Incubator is a place where we explore and highlight the work of new and young science writers and journalists, especially those who are current or recent students in specialized science, health and environmental writing programs in schools of journalism. Here, we will discuss the current state and the future of science writing, and promote the best work that the young writers are doing.

The blog is written by Bora Zivkovic, Blogs Editor at Scientific American, and Khalil Cassimally, community manager of Nature Education's Scitable blog network.

Are you a student attending an Australian or New Zealander university? Have you been mulling over writing a science story for a while? Then this competition is an ideal opportunity to fire up Microsoft Word and get cracking. Oh, and you stand a chance to get your story published on New Scientist’s website.

The NewScientist Prize for Science Writing is giving current university students (undergrad and postgrad) enrolled in an Australian or New Zealander university the opportunity to submit previously unpublished feature articles or editorials covering all aspects of science. Space, microbes, weird animals, microbes in weird animals, microbes in weird animals which are sent to space… you get the idea. Just make sure the style fits that of New Scientist’s.

Quoting its website (note that $ signifies Australian dollar):

First prize will be $1,500, and the winning article will be published on the NewScientist website. Second prize will be $750 and third prize will be $250. The three winning entries will also be given a complementary yearly subscription to the New Scientist magazine.

The competition closes next Friday, September 21. You’ve got the weekend so don’t panic (but then again, Australians rarely panic). Submissions will be judged by your typical intimidating panel of reputable scientists, science writers and editors. This year, you will have to impress the likes of Dr Karl Kruszelnicki, author of 31 popular science books, Professor Ian Chubb, Chief Scientist for Australia, and Sumit Paul-Choudhury, news editor of newscientist.com, amongst others.

The New Scientist Prize for Science Writing website also has a list of criteria which the judges will use to, well, judge your submission. List reproduced here in full:

Newsworthiness: timely work that adds to or encourages debate on current issues

Depth and detail: of coverage of issues or discoveries, and the quality of science explanation involved

Scientific accuracy: work is factually correct

Impact: work makes a balanced and significant contribution to greater public understanding and appreciation of contemporary issues or developments in science

Creativity in communicating concepts and ideas: work engenders interest by using creative and clear communication

Appropriateness of content: material is pitched at the right level in terms of complexity and technical issues for the audience involved

Adherence to ethical standards: work adheres to the highest standard of investigative journalism—including the MEAA Code of Ethics.

To summarise:

Submissions may be about any aspect of science and should be in the form of short features or editorials.