edited because i did misread the article - still -
Deputies were called to go out there, just because there were some people there?
Who happened to admit they were the ones who stole it?
That makes sense, because when that crazy girl was out there twice in a week because she forgot her camera the first time, or when the people who did
the graffiti she was filming were out there, deputies were called and went out there. Right? No? Oh. Ok.

can you elaborate on exactly how a relatively small structure on this big blue marble is "terrorism"?
rather big statement. who exactly is it terrorizing? are you terrified?
why?

did a little block explode and kill someone? no? oh.
ok, so, an icicle fell off the top and hit someone in the head then, yeah? no? not even that, eh?
did someone straddle a block and contract ebola? no? wait, i thought the Georgia Guidestones caused ebola? No?
am i misreading this site?
apparently.

geez does "deny ignorance" need to be amended to "supply evidence" and "no vague posts"?!
i would hold these obvious elements to be self evident.
sadly, others here, not so much it seems.

I'v just today read how they were defaced with what appears to be paint or some staining liquid. I'm struggling to remember exactly where I read it...
Drudge perhaps ? We are not talking the 2008 vandalism event, but just in the last couple. Perhaps I'm wrong.... I really do think it was on some
obscure article just a day or so ago.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.