Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

Generally, there are two industries that are blamed for the financial crisis: banks and homebuilders. Banks, through lax lending standards, were offering mortgages to almost anyone during the 2003-2006 time period. A funny story I’d like to share is that in 2005 I was just out of college and was working as a bartender still, earning approximately $30,000 per year (on paper). All of my college buddies seemed to be scooping up houses, both for themselves and as the “best investments ever.” One friend was working as a bellhop in Vegas, and was allowed to buy 4 “investment” homes for a combined $1,500,000. Guess what happened to those guys…

Anyways, I figured I would check it out, so I called a mortgage broker. It turned out that my documented income only qualified me for around $90,000, but with these new things called “no-doc” loans, I could say that I made $100,000 per year in tips and could qualify for $300,000 in financing! On top of that, I wouldn’t have to put much down and my initial interest rate would be just 3%! Something didn’t quite feel right, so I passed, however I think this situation sums up why the crisis happened: $30,000 per year workers qualified for as much financing as they wanted.

The banks wouldn’t have been able to keep this illusion up for as long as they did without the cooperation of the other culprits, the homebuilders. When they realized that anyone could qualify for financing, most did the logical capitalistic thing and built as many houses as possible. When the bubble burst, a lot of new home communities were left without buyers and sat vacant, even until today in some parts of the country.

Fast forward to the present time, and the stocks of most homebuilders have performed very nicely. It seems that some are making new 52-week highs every week, and I believe that most of these stocks have come too far too fast. For example, KB Home (NYSE:KBH) is an astounding 190% above its 52-week high. I’d like to take a look at some of the bigger names in homebuilding to see if there are any that make sense as investments, or if the sector should be completely avoided.

Let’s start with KB. The market seems to be pretty optimistic on this company that has lost a total of $36.23 per share since 2007 and has not had positive earnings since that time. Although KB’s business has fundamentally improved with a backlog of $619 million or 2,577 houses, this is a ways off from the $6 billion backlog the company had pre-crash.

Lennar Corporation (NYSE:LEN) is one of the largest and most geographically diverse homebuilders in the United States, and concentrates on lower-priced homes. They have done a much better job than KB in my opinion of adapting to changing market conditions, producing more scaled-down homes and with its strategy of acquiring land at rock-bottom prices that banks repossessed as a result of the crisis. Lennar Corporation (NYSE:LEN) also has a stronger balance sheet than most, with over $1.1 billion in cash.

Not surprisingly, Lennar has actually been profitable every year since 2010, and this is expected to continue. At just over 13 times TTM earnings, Lennar Corporation (NYSE:LEN) may be worth a look, even if it has risen 1035% since its post-crisis low of $3.42!