SUBJECT: HPB's Masters....quasi spirit guides...this
imposter...literary devices
Art, I have gone through alot of your recent emails and have culled
together at the end of this posting some of your various statements
in which your express your opinion about HPB's Masters. I must agree
with Peter Merritt that you give few if any specifics. You use
strong words but back them up with no evidence.
You may be on to something but your readers have no easy way to know
if your thoughts on this subject are valid or not because you supply
your readers with little to go on.
If you really feel strong on this subject as indicated by some of
your words quoted below, then I invite you to write an article or
essay on this subject and I will post it at Blavatsky Archives. The
archives has an international readership and I think interested
persons will find your thoughts most interesting. All I ask of you
is that you flesh out your thoughts and provide your readers with
some evidence and details --- not just generalizations.
You call HPB's Masters "literary devices" and "this imposter" but
fail to explain, for example, these two experiences of William Brown
and Henry Olcott:
(1) "The place to which our narrative really next pertains is the
city of Lahore. Here, as elsewhere, Colonel Olcott delivered stirring
addresses to large audiences; but Lahore has a special interest,
because there we saw, in his own physical body, Mahatma Koot Hoomi
himself."
"On the afternoon of the 19th November, I saw the Master in broad
daylight, and recognized him. . . . At Jammu I had another
opportunity of seeing Mahatma Koot Hoomi in propria persona. One
evening I went to the end of the "compound" (private enclosure), and
there I found the Master awaiting my approach. I saluted in European
fashion, and came, hat in hand, to within a few yards of the place on
which he was standing. After a minute or so he marched away, the
noise of his footsteps on the gravel being markedly audible." W.T.
Brown
(2) "One day at Bombay I was at work in my office when a Hindu
servant came and told me that a gentleman wanted to see me in Madame
Blavatsky's bungalow --- a separate house within the same
enclosure
as the main building. This was one day in 1879. I went and found
alone there my Teacher[Master Morya]. Madame Blavatsky was then
engaged in animated conversation with other persons in the other
bungalow. The interview between the Teacher and myself lasted
perhaps 10 minutes, and it related to matters of a private nature
with respect to myself and certain current events in the history of
the Society. . . . He put his hand upon my head, and his hand was
perfectly substantial; and he had altogether the appearance of an
ordinary living person. When he walked about the floor there was
noise of his footsteps. . . . He was then stopping at a bungalow, not
far from Bombay, belonging to a person connected with this
brotherhood of the Mahatmas, and used by Mahatmas who may be passing
through Bombay on business connected with their order. He came to
our place on horseback. . . . I have seen him at other times [also in
the flesh]. . . . [His appearance on all those occasions has been] as
unmistakable as the appearance of either of you gentlemen [of the SPR
sitting here and asking me questions]. . . ."
It is hard to believe that these Masters are merely "literary
devices" of HPB's especially in light of the experiences like the two
above.
I hope you will take up my invitation and write such an article and
let me publish it at Blavatsky Archives.
Daniel
Art Gregory on HPB's Masters (compiled from various emails posted on
Theos-talk)
--------------
To me the Mahatmas of the early
theosophic movement are very close to spirit guides in the
Spiritualist movement and that's just the way I see it. many of the
early theosophists were spiritualists and frequented seances
and this tinged the Mahatma concept with a kind of flavor that to
me has thrown many of our most valuable contributions into
disrepute. I would urge the classical concept of Mahatma as a
great soul or Siddhi an accomplished, perfected being that is
understood in India/Tibet as opposed to the quasi spirit guides
of our theosophic antecedents in the TS.
--------------
There is to me a lot of deception apparent and shadowy doings
that I believe that afflicted the early Theosophic movement...A
kind of spiritualistic oneupmanship and battle for leadership and
authority... We may still be suffering the effects of it.
--------------
What I understand is that the Masters as commonly understood
by Theosophists is a concept that was heavily influenced by the
spirit guides then used in the spiritualist movement... here I refer
to the mysterious letters that appear from the Mahatmas...
--------------
The "Mahatma" idea is really i believe a synthesis between the
Rosicrucian concept of the invisible brotherhood and the
european ideas of what a Mahatma was then current in the early
twentieth century... These ideas are of historical interest only and
should be respected as such. I do feel strongly that to hold to the
existence of these shadowy beings is to bring a kind of disrepute
on us and the work of theosophy.
--------------
What I mean to say is that spiritualism seems to have influenced
the manifestations of the "mahatmas" in question, such as the
mysterious letters that appear from the air.
--------------
I respectfully disagree with you regarding the existence of the
"Mahatmas" and suggest as I have that they are figures largely
influenced by the spiritualist movement and are lacking in
credibility.
--------------
This is why I feel we're really bringing a kind of disrepute on
ourselves by continuing this imposter. The rest of the world is
not so naive as to enlist under this soiled banner. I'm sorry I
must beso blunt with you,but it is sadly the case...
--------------
Her own genius is to be appreciated aside from the "masters" to
whom she attributed so much. I also suspect that the "masters"
were a literary device on her part and another expression of her
resourcefulness and genius, if you will.
---------------------------------------
Daniel H. Caldwell
info@blavatskyarchives.com
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://www.blavatskyarchives.comhttp://blavatsky.cchttp://theosophyonthe.net
You can always access our site by
simply typing into the URL address
bar the following 6 characters:
hpb.cc
---------------------------------------