317810468142747document10468moving.htmltext/html1675112009-12-08 20:30:19http://cogprints.org/317/1/moving.html31711text/htmltext/htmlpublicmoving.htmlarchive219disk0/00/00/03/171998-06-152011-03-11 08:53:482007-09-12 16:26:34journalpshow0This paper is a response to the 26 commentaries on my paper "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness". First, I respond to deflationary critiques, including those that argue that there is no "hard" problem of consciousness or that it can be accommodated within a materialist framework. Second, I respond to nonreductive critiques, including those that argue that the problems of consciousness are harder than I have suggested, or that my framework for addressing them is flawed. Third, I address positive proposals for addressing the problem of consciousness, including those based in neuroscience and cognitive science, phenomenology, physics, and fundamental psychophysical theories. Reply to: Baars, Bilodeau, Churchland, Clark, Clarke, Crick & Koch, Dennett, Hameroff & Penrose, Hardcastle, Hodgson, Hut & Shepard, Libet, Lowe, MacLennan, McGinn, Mills, O'Hara & Scutt, Price, Robinson, Rosenberg, Seager, Shear, Stapp, Varela, Velmans.http://ling.ucsc.edu/~chalmers/papers/moving.htmlChalmersDavid. J.pubconsciousness, qualia, experience, materialism, dualism, explanation13-46FALSEJournal of Consciousness StudiesTRUEphil-mindMoving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness4published1997public