On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:54:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:10:38PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:34:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:
> > > > This license is not actually DFSG-free; it grants the right to make
> > > > copies, to use copies for creating products, and to distribute copies
> > > > *internally*, but it does not grant the right to distribute copies
> > > > publically or to modify the file.
> > > The perceived consensus in 2002 was that the license is DFSG-free, but
> > > this is not my point. (However, sometimes I think it's easier to
> > > intepret the license itself than the result of the discussion about it
> > > on this list.)
> > Hmm, I've reviewed the archives and it looks like you're right here.
> Someone got some specific references? Was I part of this consensus
> (just curious)?
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200211/msg00288.html>
ff.. Much of the meat of the thread seems to have been relegated to
debian-devel:
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200211/msg02884.html>.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer