*P2: They multiply value of group productivity such as Grameen ‘s teams of 5 or hubs of 60 (in BRAC's case the numbers are slightly different). But both connect maximum 60 families per grassroots village/community hub- that's hundreds of thousands of such group productivities all across rural Bangladesh in each of these grassroots networking open society systems

*P4: Society’s resources are also maximized because that’s in the intergenerational culture of these organisations’ race to end poverty as specified by village mothers

It turns out that those who hosted banks for the poorest village mothers never separated banking from education and from desiing value chains that included the roductivity of those with the least. In the process up to 1000 microfranchises have been innovated and sustained whioch can now help communities solve their own problems with joblessness or being excluded from the way that politicians in the tv advertsing age powered over people instead of seeing their role as being public servants with each community

Miraculously George Soris helped this nation to also be the foirst to experiment with mobile connectivity in the hands of the poorest from 1996. Now if you look in bangaldesh you see the most extremely innovative cases of mobile collaboration - we welcome good news of what your searches find and of anyone who wants to featire this content in MOOCs

Next consider the multi-win design of the demand outputs

D1 Workers or employers are energised by seeing real miracles on the ground happening

D2 Customers are determining what better is in each of these community markets where all the actors can see each other

D3 Perhaps the most magical microeconmic dynamic of the system design is that while positive cashflow is insisted on its all being invested back in the community because the owners are those in greatest need in the case of grameen and the ownership is in trust of ending poverty are the village level in BRAC

D4 The demands of nature and other sustainability criteria are fully accounted for because when you are in are at the bottom (the rural village) you have no one else to externalize on and you can only make intergenerational progress if you are as smart as nature at boundaryless openness

Interestingly the way that P5 and D5 linkin to this model is as follows; because the village mothers demanded inter-generation pro-youth investment banks be the consequences of all their life's savings, trillion dollar purposes-that is what purpose does any global market serve that best matches youth's future sustainability becomes clear to any conscious capitalist ceo who has taken a first MOOC on how pro-youth economics systems of Bangladesh have been designed since the birth of this nation in 1971 - see for example the networks of wholeplanetfoundation and conscious capitalism led by US CEOs who dare to benchmark such future purposes

Replies to This Discussion

please mail chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk if you want to map a for profit to see if it can be trusted to uniquely advancing a pro-youth purpose- we will also be applying this to some webs that are new to us but come highly recommended by experts

- coming soon patientslikeme.com (help us research is there a triple win- patients, mit, investors),-expert nomination Howard Rheingold author net smart, doyen of virtual community, one of the original assemblers of the well

Dad (Norman Macrae) created the genre Entrepreneurial Revolution to debate how to make the net generation the most productive and collaborative . We had first participated in computer assisted learning experiments in 1972. Welcome to more than 40 years of linking pro-youth economics networks- debating can the internet be the smartest media our species has ever collaborated around?

1972: Norman Macrae starts up Entrepreneurial Revolution debates in The Economist. Will we the peoples be in time to change 20th C largest system designs and make 2010s worldwide youth's most productive time? or will we go global in a way that ends sustainability of ever more villages/communities? Drayton was inspired by this genre to coin social entrepreneur in 1978 ,,continue the futures debate here