This happened to me yesterday. I hate it when someone posts stuff like this on FB. After seeing the 9001st like this from this person, I decided to step in. For science.

She stopped posting these pictures.

Maggie -shared A relationship is net a test so why cheat?' s photo.
Teacher: the gnu see God?
Class: He
Teacher: the you inner: God?
Class: He
Teacher: Then there isn' t a God!
Yfq qfq qqv gqq qqv ‘Student raises their hand'
Sir, can we see gear brain?"
Teacher: He
goudere: Can gnu teeth your brain?
Teacher: He
Student: ah dang. w gnu cien' t have a
Haul?
Put this as your status if you believe in GED
and gnu will stand up far him no matter''
Like ' Comment ' Unfollow Post ' Share ' 45 minutes age ' It
Itll Todd -*adjusts he science hat*
Consider the follwing:
You can absolutely see and touch your bran. N one would need e
an MRI machine to do so. MRI, or magnetic resonance imagine,
machines vii give we a fantastic look at your bran through
magnetic fields and radio waves without that pesky radiation
from Sprays. Not enough? Try out a fancy FMRI machine, which
uses simfar techniques to pant an even clearer picture of active
parts of the bran through reading the magnetic properties of stuff
in your blood. You rean want more? Scream it out louder, because
it' s about to get painful. Given a sufficient cutting tool and a
ricki:: eless threshold fer pan, we can very easiy open up your own
head and look in the mirier. This e not recommended.
In short, one can see, measure, observe, and directtv prove the
brain' s existence. whie saving that being unable to see and touch
the medically means that there en' t one e a bad argument,
astonishing only that we cannot see and touch the (a more
appropriate assertion would be that the cannot be directtv
observed, therefore cannot be proved or disproved with
current methodology), applying these criteria to someting that
can directtv and corrosively be observed, ike the bran, does not a
vadd argument make.
This rebuttal e made passible by a generous grant from science and
viewers ike we.
2 minutes ago ' like
Write iii comment...

>be christian.
>best friend atheist
> 2 good Mormon friends
> great friend who lives very close is catholic.
> been friends with all of them for well over 10 years because we dont discuss our religious views with eachother.

holy ****.. i can see how you get along with an atheist friend, satanist friend, nazi friend, but a feminist? seriously? i cant go more than like 5min before i make a feminist joke and less than half an hour before the ********* starts..

It's very funny actually. Then again, she's one of the good kind, not the "WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EVERYTHING"-kind. The best part is when the guys tries to make fun of her, and she just wipe their asses with knowledge and facts. That's awesome.

now when i read your name i think i realize the reason.. your female right? please disregard all my comments.. no offense meant, but i tihnk almost all guys some time in their life has experienced feminists being pissed of at them for no reason and hearing arguments about how men control the world, earn more than women etc etc etc.. well that have lead me and many of my friends + millions more to hate the word "feminism" and instead call it "equalism" since many of the feminist we hear are completely ******* mad.

Tl:DR Feminism is just a word thats been mixed with alot of **** like "conspiracy theory"

I sort of understand you, and all men. Me myself am one of those girls who'd like there to be some sort of difference between males and females, but I never dare to say it out loud because girls will hate me. The fact that I'm female have also gotten me in a lot of feminist-debates with me saying "I don't care" and the dudes/feminists saying "you have to pick a side". And also, I would like to call my friend a equalist because she isn't really that bad, but she really stand behind the feminist-part. Besides, she only talk back to those who make fun of/troll her in the first place. She's also on the male side when the real bad feminist-hags does ****** things. Like there was a debate here in Sweden about a half year ago where a bitch wanted to ban men from having a child without a female involved, with **** like "men can't handle the softness of a baby because of their masculine hands". My friend got pissed of by that, standing behind the point that men can take care of children without a mother to be involved.

I hate these wannabe religious people. They use religion for some sort of excuse when it fits their cause and play out to be Christians while they can't even name the ten commandments. Religion turned out to be some sort of style insecure people use today, its pathetic.

It's funny that just about anyone (atheists, christians, etc.) who you ask to recite the 10 commandments will start with "not kill" and "not steal". Some people might get a few others, most often "not covet", but nobody remembers the first (and therefore most important) commandments.

In our society, of course.
Which just goes to show the primitive nature of the authors of the bible, who thought not killing or stealing should only come after worshipping God as the only god, not having false idols, etc.

I ******* hate these posts, they just make me mad in general. The "x if you ___ god" posts aren't half as annoying as the scientific ass-clowns that try to logic with EVERY SINGLE THING that they disagree with.

Actually, what I'm getting at is there are some people (and you should be able to tell who they are) just cannot be taught a damn thing. Seriously, you might as well go find the nearest tree and try to teach it how to count. You'll probably have an easier time to tell you the truth.