These (actually multiple) photos of them doing this to infants, in particular, turn my stomach. I recall having my son circumcised and am glad it was done by a doctor I knew and respected, and not by some animal who actually got-off on it. I mean; honestly!

Yes well lets not forget Pedophile is Legal in Judasism, infact Rabbi Simon Ben Yohai in the talmud says in the tractate KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.

Why on Earth would you or anyone allow a ‘doctor’ to sexually mutilate your son? Shame!

This is a barbaric JUDAIC Practice that has only been practiced by non jews in the last few decades. J E Ws sold us on the idea thinking it would reduce cervivcal cancer, never asserting that abstinence is the best protection.

Well, Bill, it was 27 years ago.
I worked with the doctor who did it, and the main reason for this was? His father (my then husband) had also gone through it. We decided, together, that he would be most comfortable to be like his dad.

Would I do it, today, were I to have a child? No, I would not. But, times were different for me. My life was much different 27 years back.

When my ex husband was 8, all the boys in the village went on the same day down to the river where they were circumcised one by one. For the next week or two all the little boys wore sarongs or skirts. Life went on. This was in the very devout Catholic Philippines about 46 years ago.

I am pretty sure it’s gone on for more than a couple of decades. I’m one of the younger children in my family, at 54, and had 6 brothers; most older and all circumcised. All of the neighborhood boys had been, too. When I did have my son circumcised, percentages for were over seventy, in the US.. And there were pros and cons presented for either way.

While my son was curcumcised, I held him and nursed him. He did not flinch and never wimpered. I know it sounds strange, but the way it’s done is more like ear-piercing with the hoops that slowly create holes over ten days or so. It’s done with a “bell”, as it is called, not a scalpel.

The act of holding a child down and cutting off a portion of his penis would certainly be regarded as a grievous form of sexual abuse in a society that was predicated on ordinary sanity and common decency, but alas ! …. these qualities are being granted almost no respect in this crazy society of ours.

The only natural response to circumcision is RAGE against the parents and the screwed-up society that condoned it. It boggles the mind when you realize that a sizable portion of the male population is walking around with a hidden resentment which they dare not express.

And for me, it had not a thing to do with religion..
It was a medical decision, and was presented as a medical decision, only.
Our decision (his father’s and mine) was based on the numbers of boys, or percentages in the town in which we lived, who were circumsized, at the time, as well as the fact that his dad (who’d also grown-up in a Catholic family and was son of a surgeon and a nurse), had it done to him-self decades before.
We just wanted our son to be more comfortable in being most like the other kdis and his uncles and dad, too.