Does the term Metrosexual mean much?
Backbones have been replaced with man purses, OOps a french carrying case, sorry.
Our women want us to be tender and open to todays people, let out our true feelings....
We cannot piss off the Jeffersons , now can we. after all dey be moving on up. to the east side.. dey finally gots dem a peice a da pie. Jess don let dem chitlins burn...

I see kids now a days dressing like they have no idea what sex they are. C' mon ya bunch of fags. I just wanna smash the little ****s in the face. Jeez, mommy and daddy has found jesus and he says to love one another, sos we loves the negroes and spics, cause as the song says, jesus loves the little chillen, all the chillen of the world, red and yellow; black and white.
Ya all know the tune..... C' mon sing along...

Does the term Metrosexual mean much?
Backbones have been replaced with man purses, OOps a french carrying case, sorry.
Our women want us to be tender and open to todays people, let out our true feelings....
We cannot piss off the Jeffersons , now can we. after all dey be moving on up. to the east side.. dey finally gots dem a peice a da pie. Jess don let dem chitlins burn...

I see kids now a days dressing like they have no idea what sex they are. C' mon ya bunch of fags. I just wanna smash the little ****s in the face. Jeez, mommy and daddy has found jesus and he says to love one another, sos we loves the negroes and spics, cause as the song says, jesus loves the little chillen, all the chillen of the world, red and yellow; black and white.
Ya all know the tune..... C' mon sing along...

Like most of the rest of us, I am as perplexed as anyone. The only thing that ever resonated was when I happened to be reading a story about the extinction of the Passenger Pigeon, the last example of which died in 1914.

The passenger pigeon's technique of survival had been based on mass tactics. There had been safety in its large flocks which often numbered hundreds of thousands of birds. When a flock of this size established itself in an area, the number of local animal predators (such as wolves, foxes, weasels, and hawks) was so small compared to the total number of birds that little damage could be inflicted on the flock as a whole.

This colonial way of life became very dangerous when man became a predator on the flocks. When the birds were massed together, especially at a nesting site, it was easy for man to slaughter them in such huge numbers that there were not enough birds left to successfully reproduce the species.

The interests of civilization, with its forest clearing and farming, were diametrically opposed to the interests of the birds which needed the huge forests to survive. The passenger pigeons could not adapt themselves to existing in small flocks. When their interests clashed with the interests of man, civilization prevailed. The wanton slaughter of the birds only sped up the process of extinction. The converting of forests to farmland would have eventually doomed the passenger pigeon.

European man's greatest strength, and his greatest weakness has always been his individualism. It served us so well against the elements of mother nature, but failed us so badly (so far) against infiltrating ethnocentric groups.

However, we may yet have the final triumph because unlike the passenger pigeons (and our adversaries), Whites are not all so alike. It is possible that some of our people may unwittingly carry genes that are capable of defeating the entire resources available in the gene pool of all the opposing tribes. If only we could figure out where to look for, find, and how to operate our unique weapon.

I often wonder if the answer has somehow been right under our (Roman) noses the whole time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Protocols

There is nothing more dangerous than individual initiative; if it has a touch of genius it can accomplish more than a million people among whom we have sown dissensions.

Our adversaries have studied us well. Ironically, perhaps to see the key requires a likewise examination of them, and being able to understand both their inner workings and ours in a way that they cannot understand themselves.

We are only required to gain control of either our own people, or our enemies, to win.

Good question! Who knows? White men seem to have lost their b#### in the 60's and 70's. Constant negative bombardment from the media helped a lot. The media had a monopoly until the internet became popular. Whites are now waking up, but far too late. We have empowered mediocre, ignorant people who are dependent on whites for survival. Blacks and Mexicans think they have the world by the tail, only because of their stupidity. I'm sure the same applies to blacks and muslims in European nations. When whites wake up and realize these people are helpless weaklings without us, they may gain some fighting spirit back. Don't get me wrong, this doesn't apply to all whites, but not enough.

My opinion may be idealistic, but it is from the heart. The warrior spirit is there, to be sure, but a man fights not because he hates what is before him, but because he loves what is behind him. I am living in South Africa, gentlemen and I do not love what is behind me. The land and its people are lethargic, racially poisoned, stagnant and corrupt and I wouldn't lift a finger over any fate for my "nation" at this time.

Give me a flag, a symbol of our people, give us a nation and I swear to you that I'd be on that border, that front line, for as many years as is necessary and that a nation geared towards fostering our interests as a folk and giving my children the best opportunity in life would be worth dying and more importantly, living for.

Our people's nations are poisoned and it is only natural that they won't have a fighting spirit. They do not love what is behind them. The front lines aren't what they used to be.

This is it exactly.........men won't fight for the status quo. Far too much "progress" in the present times.

We have combined with apathy a goodly portion of men who seek to "opt out" of the current mess; these A-types, the normal leaders of a healthy revolution, sense the apparent futility of going against the grain and in their quest for the financial means of escape become part of the problem.

Thus the cycle is self-perpetuating. The followers are brain-dead, and the leaders are "playing the game" in an effort towards buying time.

The died-in-the-wool yahoos, impossible to repress, are bleed-off fighting wars that ultimately work against them.

Root cause? Feminism, first and foremost. When a man is not treated like a man he will either become apathetic, seek to isolate himself, or revert to a more primitive, "live for today" existence.

The latter reaction being common among today's boys who, lacking positive and holistic societal feedback, "go gansta" or some other form of over-the-top hyper-masculinity in an attempt to psychically self-balance in a world where men are expected to be obedient oxes.

Here we have to make an important distinction between a "fighting spirit" which serves a people, and a savagery which undermines society.

Look at today's dolts training for and viewing this "cage-fighting" thing..........one would swear you were going back in time to some Godless past of squabbling tribal brutality. Lacking a civilized outlet for aggression (the cannon fodder aside) men are flocking to this miasma of misplaced testosterone in a puerile, and pathetic effort at grasping some shred of their former manhood and respectability.

Hell, you can't even get in a little street tussle any more for fear of being hounded by the authorities and fined to bankruptcy. So, men are either "taking it to the streets and living for today" (gangsta) , or if they wish to maintain their money and property they "save it up for Friday night" (blood circuses).........the whole damn thing is devolution.

Fighting spirit is largely still alive, only we fight ourselves.

Puritanism being the second problem, one that both partially emanates from, and/or is greatly exasperated by the above poison of unnatural gender expectation.

All these stupid demands made upon the average Joe............don't smoke, don't drink a couple beers and drive, don't do this, don't do that, you must have a normally male work environment "female and child friendly" and so forth. This not to mention the insane ideal of expecting men to both be civil AND allow women (females) to run riot.

Why should the normal man support anything but his immediate concerns?

Add the job-sourcing "free marketers" to the mix and you have the average guy so harried and overworked it's surprising he functions at all.

The root cause of all our woes is cultural breakdown. One cannot both support unnatural policy and expect men to act in a natural fashion.

Men are today RE-acting in a way that should come as no surprise to anyone who honestly looks at the present scenario.

Our enemies have for decades pushed an agenda of "rationalism" while simultaneously, in calculated fashion, undermined the emotional (read:REAL) cultural landscape.

Our adversaries have studied us well. Ironically, perhaps to see the key requires a likewise examination of them, and being able to understand both their inner workings and ours in a way that they cannot understand themselves.

We are only required to gain control of either our own people, or our enemies, to win.

I have been called an extremist, a reactionary, a revisionist, an elitist, a supremacist, a racist, a homophobe, an anti-Semite, a right-winger, a theocrat, a godless cynic, a fascist and, of course, a must for every German, a Nazi.

So, it should be expected that I have a foible for politically "incorrect" sites that every "modern," "decent," "civilized," "tolerant," and "enlightened" man is supposed to ignore and avoid.

This is it exactly.........men won't fight for the status quo. Far too much "progress" in the present times.

We have combined with apathy a goodly portion of men who seek to "opt out" of the current mess; these A-types, the normal leaders of a healthy revolution, sense the apparent futility of going against the grain and in their quest for the financial means of escape become part of the problem.

Thus the cycle is self-perpetuating. The followers are brain-dead, and the leaders are "playing the game" in an effort towards buying time.

The died-in-the-wool yahoos, impossible to repress, are bleed-off fighting wars that ultimately work against them.

Root cause? Feminism, first and foremost. When a man is not treated like a man he will either become apathetic, seek to isolate himself, or revert to a more primitive, "live for today" existence.

The latter reaction being common among today's boys who, lacking positive and holistic societal feedback, "go gansta" or some other form of over-the-top hyper-masculinity in an attempt to psychically self-balance in a world where men are expected to be obedient oxes.

Here we have to make an important distinction between a "fighting spirit" which serves a people, and a savagery which undermines society.

Look at today's dolts training for and viewing this "cage-fighting" thing..........one would swear you were going back in time to some Godless past of squabbling tribal brutality. Lacking a civilized outlet for aggression (the cannon fodder aside) men are flocking to this miasma of misplaced testosterone in a puerile, and pathetic effort at grasping some shred of their former manhood and respectability.

Hell, you can't even get in a little street tussle any more for fear of being hounded by the authorities and fined to bankruptcy. So, men are either "taking it to the streets and living for today" (gangsta) , or if they wish to maintain their money and property they "save it up for Friday night" (blood circuses).........the whole damn thing is devolution.

Fighting spirit is largely still alive, only we fight ourselves.

Puritanism being the second problem, one that both partially emanates from, and/or is greatly exasperated by the above poison of unnatural gender expectation.

All these stupid demands made upon the average Joe............don't smoke, don't drink a couple beers and drive, don't do this, don't do that, you must have a normally male work environment "female and child friendly" and so forth. This not to mention the insane ideal of expecting men to both be civil AND allow women (females) to run riot.

Why should the normal man support anything but his immediate concerns?

Add the job-sourcing "free marketers" to the mix and you have the average guy so harried and overworked it's surprising he functions at all.

The root cause of all our woes is cultural breakdown. One cannot both support unnatural policy and expect men to act in a natural fashion.

Men are today RE-acting in a way that should come as no surprise to anyone who honestly looks at the present scenario.

Our enemies have for decades pushed an agenda of "rationalism" while simultaneously, in calculated fashion, undermined the emotional (read:REAL) cultural landscape.

I blame the televitz. Before its introduction we were proudly whites only and strong. After its arrival we slowly became a confused rabble. Take control of the media, or destroy it and we will soon revert to our natural state.