-original message-
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace at rocketmail.com>
Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
> "That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
> associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept
> and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without
> authorization. I’ll identify several aspects of the design and
> implementation of the Lawful Intercept (LI) and Simple Network Management
> Protocol Version 3 (SNMPv3) protocols that can be exploited to gain access
> to the interface, and provide recommendations for mitigating those
> vulnerabilities in design, implementation, and deployment."
>> More here:
>http://blogs.iss.net/archive/blackhatlitalk.html>> Gadi.
For the sake of clarity and transparency,
Gadi Evron has absolutely no connection to this research whatsoever.
He is famous in the security community for piggybacking off other peoples research.
We are frustrated with him as much as we are annoyed.
Andrew
Security consultant
CITATION NEEDED