3. Deportation of all illegal immigrants and any person trafficking in any illegal drug (including cannabis).

4. Restore the Motion Picture Production code. End all television programming except PBS.

5. Allow segregation of private facilities.

6. Single-payer universal healthcare.

7. Restore hanging in all fifty states as the punishment for murder or treason. Require solitary confinement of all felons for the duration of their sentences (conversations with guards and visits from family allowed for exemplary behavior). Send drug addicts to a remote forced labor camp.

8. End all public assistance to out-of-wedlock mothers. Replace all student loans with a limited pool of merit-based scholarships.

9. Conscript all able-bodied young men for military service. Expel women and faggots from the armed forces.

10. Make the right to vote and jury service conditional on meeting property, educational, and military service requirements.

I know it's sexier to think about all-out nuclear war, but this isn't about total war. We actually need our military for mundane tasks like patrolling the border or securing sea lanes for commerce or fighting sand niggers for their oil. Since national defense is a public good, it makes sense that those who are able to should participate.

I certainly don't think everyone should be a full-time soldier, but militia service isn't too much to expect.

"dood, solitary confinement actually drives people mad, you will be releasing people with worsened mental health who were committing crimes before you fucked them up some more"

I don't think the mental illnesses associated with malingering convicts actually makes them violent. They just talk to walls and shit.

Prison is only awful for the innocent right now. It does little to punish the guilty; for hardened criminals, it's just a networking event. Solitary confinement would cut criminals down to size, remind them of how petty and insignificant they really are compared to the State. If that knowledge drives them mad, whatever. They're criminals.

Whipping, again, is only awful to those who haven't been brutalized. It's effective in schools for that reason. It's completely stupid to beat some gangbanger who gets off on macho displays.

"except you have to let almost all of them out, I don't see the upside to a previously violent armed robber who now talks to himself and doesn't care if he lives or dies"

Extended solitary confinement leaves most people docile. Violence is rare and almost always self-directed. So there's one advantage right away.

I think it will have a deterrent effect when the previously violent armed robber is released from prison, talks to himself all the time, can barely get through sentences without breaking into tears, and finally kills himself one lonely night. I think it will strike the fear of God into potential criminals, to realize the State can wipe out your soul if it chooses. Prison is about fear, not repentance. Right now, we outsource that function to criminals. Unsurprisingly, people are only afraid of criminals. I think they should be more frightened of the State.

I personally enjoy the thought of wicked and lawless people being broken down completely. Why do we put people in prison? Because they're human garbage and nobody wants them. Criminals are selfish, they care only about themselves. Fine, they can live only with themselves. We're giving them absolutely what they want: a world in which there is no one else. If that drives them mad, good.

Good behavior can be rewarded with an occasional conversation with the guards. Stellar behavior might earn a visit from family. But the default punishment should be complete segregation from society.

"a gangbanger will not get off on a dozen lashes while he cries in front of his banger friends, it obviously has to be public"

You obviously know nothing about hardened criminals. He's not going to cry from a dozen lashes. Your system punishes the innocent worse than the guilty.

Keep in mind I'm not referring necessarily to neckbeards like you in general, but the particularly harmful and hypocritical brand of libertarianism espoused by the Drs. Paul. The only ones they would outwardly hate would be single payer healthcare and perhaps drug penalties and conscription, they would either directly support or invoke the glibertarian "we don't give a shit" or "why yes, segregation does give more rights to the states" at the others. I suspect they'd get over their opposition to drug penalties and conscription once they see how nicely it gels with their racial perspectives.