I've just gone through the database of those applications that are in the Private database, (using [#] in the search field) and voted for accordingly. If anyone feels I've missed an application that should be in the main database then let me know. Please take into consideration I don't test .NET applications or Java because I don't have the facility to do so.

hrm, i can see the benefit of some kind of pruning but i have to say, just because a program hasnt been voted in, doesnt mean its not portable. So just deleting all the old entries seems like a waste to me.
For instance, i threw Luxinia in a long while back, and while its not been voted in, it is portable.

Granted its not a great example, just one that i know of,

"It's not that I'm Evil, just that I'm unwillingly Good."
-Stolen, but oh so fitting. ^-^

It might take me a while to reply to any post or comments, I only have internet access once a week.
So if I don't reply or miss a question, this is why.

Of course certain entries should be considered on an individual basis, but for those entries that were added 2 years ago with poor description, no icon, no screenshot, incorrect details, missing extraction details etc.. then they have no business being there*

Some of them looks just like spam, some duplicates, abandonwares, not stealth, downvoted with intention entries etc.
But there also many interesting entries, which you would never know that they was even added to the database!

TO ALL TPFC MEMBERS:

Please, look at that list, maybe you'll find something interesting and will upvote!
Just click HERE

TO EVERYBODY:

When you add something to TPFC, don't forget to write about it in the forum!!!

Reminder:
If you want to search for private entries, just type [#] in the search field
If you want to search for some private entry, just add [#] before item, for example: [#]Textilosaurus

Last edited by billon on Sun May 06, 2018 1:59 pm, edited 16 times in total.