Hi
folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on September
18th 2009. For the newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
On the web site you’ll see on the front page all the other sites I have up there.
Bookmark them for future use because the main servers occasionally go down and
that way you’ll be able to download the latest shows from the other
sites. There’s a whole bunch to choose from [listed above]. alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
is the European site. It has the same audios as the rest but it also has
the addition of transcripts which you can download for print up, written in the
various languages of Europe, Scandinavia, etc.

Remember,
that I’m probably the only talk show host that relies on the listeners to
support him… completely that is. I’m not backed by any foundations, NGOs
or companies or whatever. The advertising on this show is paid by the
advertisers straight to the station RBN for their air time, their staff,
technicians, equipment and their bills. So it’s up to you the listeners
to keep me going and you can do so by looking at the web sites. There’s
ways to purchase my books and disks, etc. [Listed above and at end of
transcript.] Ordering can be done through PayPal, just also send me an
email. Remember, cash cuts out the middle man. So it’s up to
you to keep me going by purchasing that which I have for sale or through
donations. Lots of people get disks burned, they don’t have computers and
they’re played in CD players. They get passed around at meetings and so
on. You can get in touch with me at [address above].

I’m
not backed by any of the big groups out there or ANY groups out there. I
like to be independent. This way I can pretty well say what I want to
say. If you’re under sponsorship, you’re generally limited as to certain
topics. You can’t criticize certain topics either. So it makes me a
free agent. I’m not out to make a career out of this because I don’t need
it. Believe you me, I’d be making money doing something else very, very
easily, very quickly, if I wanted to do so. This is a full time
occupation, 7 days a week and every day there’s a crisis here and there with
computers and different things that have to be done... weekends as well.
That’s just the way it goes. Plus, you have problems with the satellite
upload. That’s what I use. I’m in the rural areas, so I don’t have
cable. Xplornet is the company I go through. They punish me for
using it. They punish me. I can’t watch videos or anything.
They’ve got me on an automatic rollover thing where they just cut me off.
It slows to almost a halt and then it dies on you. Then you have to
restart your computer about 10 times in an hour and maybe, maybe you can get
dial-up speed once in a while. That’s what they do when you try to use
it. Back with more after these messages.

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. You
find the more that you study reality… it’s a hard thing to come across,
reality. You certainly won’t find it in the mainstream. Once you
understand how to decipher reality, you can definitely see where mainstream
leads you. That’s its job, it’s to lead you in a concentrated effort
along a certain path of thought. Really, it’s all designed for you
not to do much, just go along with it and those thoughts and opinions become
your thoughts and opinions. Everything seems quite natural as they
move you from one corral to the next corral to the next corral. That’s
how it’s done. It’s very simple. They’re all on board with the same agenda at the same time. That’s why you have
news blitzes, they used to call them. News blitzes where the same topics,
controversial topics, explode across the
world at the exact same time. It’s to ‘raise public awareness’, as
they like to call it, as they condition you to accept a point of view that they
designed that you will come to without thinking through it.

We’re
living in a time now of INCREDIBLE CHANGES. When the big boys and the
eugenics societies and academia and the sciences, etc are all working together
towards this brave new world - post-industrial - where they don’t need all of
the lower classes any more. In fact, they don’t even need the middle
classes. In fact, they’re very afraid of the middle classes because down
through history it’s generally the middle classes who’ve lead the charge for
change that also helped the lower classes. Without the middle classes
doing the charging or the leading, unfortunately the lower classes tend not to
do it themselves or they fall into the extreme left-wing and that’s designed
for them and is ruled by the elite from the top anyway. It’s a false
paradigm.

For
a while now they’ve been going on about population reduction. In the 70s,
it came out in a concentrated effort to promote small families through
abortions and to make it acceptable amongst the populace until it’s
commonplace. That’s happened. I knew then they’d go for the elderly
and sure enough, they did eventually start that. Euthanasia… in places
like Holland and then other countries are following suit. A long time
ago, you’ll find people like Julian Huxley who worked for the United Nations at
UNESCO in his own writings – I’ve read it on the air from his own book – where
he said ‘we’ll have to TEACH the public to think not just about birth control
but about death control.’ Meaning eliminating people when THEY decide at
the top that they don’t need you anymore, there’s just too many of the same
kind, around the same age and you’re about retirement age.

They
want to bring the populations of the world down. Now it’s one thing to
encourage people to have small families but it’s another thing when they
SERIOUSLY debate ways and means to start CULLING the population – those
who are ALIVE. I’m literally dead serious about this because they’ve been
doing this for a long time, having these world meetings and talks about
it. And they don’t just talk about it at the top, they IMPLEMENT plans to
bring down populations. That’s the real world. That’s the REAL
world. We’re run by oligarchs… not democracies.

They
give you during you lifetime MAIN HEROES in certain areas from television that
you’ll follow. They become your guiding light in certain areas like
wildlife. In Canada, they gave us David Suzuki, a guy who’s up on YouTube
when he was a young Professor comparing human beings to maggots. He is a
eugenicist and a geneticist. They’re always the same. The two go
together; you can’t be one without the other. They start off in genetics
teaching you about eugenics, all in the Darwinian type route… superior,
inferior and all the that kind of stuff. In Britain they gave an icon who
was on the go before I was born called David Attenborough… a nice flowing
voice. He went all over the world showing all these nice animals and all
the rest of it. I mentioned him about a month ago when he came out with
the Optimum Population Trust demanding
they start bringing down the populations. Here he is again, along with
Suzuki too. They’re all in the same club you might say. Every
county has their Attenborough and their Suzuki. Every country has been
given them and not by chance. They’ve been selected, trained, and they
all belong to the same club WITH always the same final agenda. That’s how
you control the world. It’s standardized across the world.

As
I say, he’s an icon for people in Britain and English-speaking countries.
This is the Sunday Times.

News Review interview: David Attenborough

The naturalist is frightened (Alan:
He’s frightened.) by the number of people
in the world and says the human race needs to be reduced

From The Sunday Times April 19, 2009 /
Camilla Long

(Alan: See,
it’s right out in the open. This is at a time when world meetings are
going on about ‘oh, there’s going to be millions of deaths from this swine
flu.’ I guarantee you, if something is given to the public, it will be
RELEASED ON the public. These guys are serious at the top. The only
problem they have is to release something and have us dying off, thinking it
really is some freak of nature that’s killing you and not them.)

Bending gingerly
over a deep, green pond in the garden of his home in Richmond, southwest
London, Sir David Attenborough and I are inspecting a great crested newt.
“Triturus!” he says, pointing. “Look. Looook . . . ” – the bosky voice creeps
past gas mark 4 – “he is waaafting his hormones at her. And in a minute . . . ”
The animal (unfortunately I had been looking at a reed) flicks in the water.
“She’s off! Whuuuhnderful!”

It is the first
proper day of spring, and after a short scuffle with the double doors we have
come outside “the posh way” – ie, not through the kitchen – cantered briskly
onto the lawn, past a large mossy patch on the patio (“Don’t step on that or
you’ll end up in a sewer”) and straight up to the pond to see his new
toys. (A: I don’t know who wrote this… Camilla Long… it’s like a
novel isn’t it?)

At 82, Attenborough
is a vision in taupe, with talcum-powder features, a surprisingly firm
handshake and a manner that is occasionally brusque, shading to sarcastic
(“Yes, it’s a bird”). His daughter Susan offers me a drink of water, before
disappearing into an office. “She lives three-quarters of an hour away,” he
says, alighting on a small garden seat. “My wife died 12 years ago, so she
comes here and restocks the fridge and, as she puts it elegantly, mucks me
out.”

(A: They
talk about his house as though it’s a natural history museum. He’s lived
there for 55 years. I’m trying to get to the point of this whole
story. It’s like one of these soaps or one of these novels.)

Attenborough is not
here to discuss wild-life. He is here to discuss humans, and how there are far
too many of them. Earlier last week, when it was announced that he had become a
patron of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT) (A: That’s that bunch of
very, very rich white men, as they call themselves.), he explained that
“there are three times as many people in the world as when I started making
television programmes 56 years ago. It is frightening. We can’t go on as we
have been. We are seeing the consequences in terms of eco-logy, atmospheric
pollution and in terms of space and food production”. (A:
Then he goes through the whole spiel the eugenics guys want you to believe in
as they roll out their graphs and their charts and all that rubbish, something
they’ve been doing since the days of Malthus. He used charts as
well. All of his predictions were baloney too and most of the figures he
just plucked out of the air. They’re still doing this same stuff
today. But this guy is an icon so when he speaks people drop their jaws
and listen to this idol of ecology and nature worship. Now his real
motive for doing all those years in a career on television has come to the
front. This is the real point of it all, not the animals. He
doesn’t tell you how fast the animals are breeding does he? …or the
tadpoles? …and all the wetlands that have been created for them to swim
about in so they can grow up by billions and billions? He doesn’t mention
that. No. It’s HUMANS that are the problem, humans he says.
Then he says…)

Besides, what’s the
ideal figure for human life on Earth? Attenborough is a little soft-focus on
details. (A: Of course they are because they’re plucking them out of
the air.) “I don’t know how you’d calculate . . . optimum-ness, but
certainly, the mere fact of what we’re doing to the natural world makes it
perfectly clear we’re way past it. Half the world’s starving.” (A:
No wonder. People never look in to the reason for starvation. You
know all through the Cold War we heard different parts of the world with
starvation going on. It’s because East and the West were arming factions
to fight each other in areas where they wanted to decimate the populations so
the big corporations could move in and take it over. That happened all
the time. Plus you had the agri-food business taking over the farms as
governments of countries in the Western world were all putting farmers out of business
through legislation. Lots of farmers were put out. Thousands and
thousands of farms in the US and Canada were put under by government
legislation. Inspectors coming on the land, ‘oh, e-coli comes from the
cattle, you’re too near a stream - it’s a mile away - and it might get into
that stream,’ as the deer walk through the stream and poop in it. That’s
okay. And so on and so on. This is how they’ve done it. You
MUST control the public, the population, through food. It’s a great
weapon. That’s what they said at the United Nations Ministry of
Agriculture, that food has always been used as a weapon. We’re going to
see that very shortly, used as a weapon… because 5 agri-food businesses
literally – all the major shareholders are all the SAME people and is really
one company as far as I’m concerned – control the world’s food supply.)

He has seen this for
himself countless times in “African slums, South American slums. Little kids
playing with open sewers, rats, filth, disease, poverty, terrible”. (A:
Look into Latin America. There are some great videos on them. In
fact, you’ll see the problems there through US policies in Latin America and
the fact that they’d already slated most of South America to come into the
NAFTA Agreement and be the supplier of most vegetables FOR the Americas in the
future. They’ve been putting all the people who lived on the land OFF the
land for years and years and years and moving them into these slums.
That’s why you see the poverty, the disease, etc down in South America.
These guys OMIT as much as they can to mislead you off into a different
direction. Back with more after this break.)

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an
article from the Times about David Attenborough. The wonderful hero to
many people, who comes out for wildlife and gives you nature talks and shows
you furry, cute animals and now he’s showing his real, true colors as the eugenicists that he truly is: an
elitists eugenicist, of course. They’re all elitist at the top. And
he’s a SIR as well. He gives you misleading statements here about
starvation. He doesn’t tell you WHY there’s been starvation across the
world. Yet book after book was published on starvation all through the
70s and 80s into the 90s. It was because the East and West had factions
fighting each other. They were arming BOTH sides. When people are
fighting little wars, left-wing and right-wing, they’re not farming.
They’re not farming. That’s why they were having all these different
famines across various countries. He admits that part; he just tries to
make you think there are just too many people. Same with Latin
America, in Latin America the policy is to get all the people who are
self-sufficient off their lands and they have gotten SO many off and now
they’re thrown together in these little slum areas… with no right to farm. That’s the future agenda:
agri-food business only, the big boys. Then he goes into his other thing
too.

So what’s a large
number? Attenborough has two: Susan, who is unmarried, and Robert, an
anthropologist, who has two children. The great naturalist pauses to
think. (A: The great naturalist. I guess that means we’re
all unnatural… maybe we’re artificial eh?) “Five. The fact is,”
he sighs, “the human race ought to be reduced.” (A: He
won’t volunteer. None of these people volunteer to be an example to the
rest.)

You can’t just get
rid of people, though. “No, no,” he says. “Well, you say that, but you do get
rid of people – there are famines, and people are very good at getting rid of
each other. (A: They’ve always used wars and stuff.) I’m not
for a micro-second suggesting that’s a good thing, but there are all sorts of
diseases and disasters that can happen to humanity.” (A: Now
don’t think for a minute this guy isn’t up in the top meetings discussing ways
of wiping you all out because of course he will be. Of course he will
be. This is what all this swine flu nonsense is all about and so
on. All of this is to get us ready for something coming, something
coming. By all the laws of health and medicine no one could possibly
predict… and here they are, it’s coming in October - THEY JUST KNOW IT - across
the whole planet. If anything happens in October, it will be from the shot itself. Then they’ll turn
around and tell you that you actually caught the flu and the shot didn’t
work. People will believe it too. This goes on to say…)

So if we don’t take
control of the problem ourselves, then nature or self-interest will. None of
this is really applicable to Britain, of course. Here the problem is not
overpopulation, but the ageing population. (A: The ageing
population. They’ve already got rid of the young; they abort them.
You’ve got read Charles Galton Darwin [The Next Million Years], the guy
who was right out in front about it on ways to depopulate society. He
mentioned really WHY. He says, ‘We can’t allow the lower classes to
breed. We should encourage the upper classes to breed and give them
incentives to breed, but you must start eliminating the lower classes’ because
he saw the end of industrialization. They know too and Charles Galton
Darwin knew this as well, that if they allow people a better standard of living
and the chance at a good work occupation and a better income, they’d gradually,
without being forced to, have smaller families anyway and they’d go for
material goods. They understand that. But now they’re bypassing
even that, saying ‘sustainability, we’re consuming too much.’ So they
brought in the greening agenda along with depopulation. You will see
people volunteering eventually for death, to save the world. They might
even have old pagan fanfares like they used to have in ancient days.
They’ll all be dressed in green and grass sticking out of their hair and all
that kind of stuff… as they start killing the ones who have volunteered to die
to save the planet… for Ceres and all that kind of stuff. Wonderful.)

“Yes, it presents
great economic problems,” says Attenborough. (A: That’s a place
of the sun, Atonborough, isn’t it?) “It’s a question of the lesser of
two evils.” He will be 83 next month: presumably he wouldn’t like it if there
was no one to look after him? “Of course you wouldn’t, because you’re selfish .
. . It’s that blue butterfly again!” He pauses. “What was I saying?” (A:
As though he’s absent minded.)

Keeping the
population down. Getting old. Closing our borders? “We have to keep our borders
open: it’s a worldwide problem,” he says. (A: There’s what you can’t
understand. Britain DID follow the guidelines. They were
goodie-two-shoes and they were told from the 20s onward to have smaller
families and go for the material goods and they did that. Then during
Maggie Thatcher’s reign and just before she came in, in fact, they opened the
borders to many countries including India. Maggie Thatcher said, ‘We’ve
got to; you see, people in Britain are not producing enough children to pay off
the national debt.” You can’t please these creeps at the top. It’s
an agenda. It’s true; it’s a world wide
agenda. They don’t care about nations. They never did care
about nations. They used all the nations for war and profiteering but
that was it, to get to a certain stage. Now the goal is the whole world and
they don’t care about the peasant of Russia. He’s equivalent to the
peasant of anywhere else including Britain, as far as they’re concerned.)
“You want a free movement of people round the world because that’s the only
way you’re going to stop wars. (A: Oh, really? NO.
If the big boys stopped financing them and putting their boys into governments then you would stop the wars.
These guys are born liars. You’re talking about a certain class that’s
been around for an awful long time, an aristocracy, who’ve been BEHIND ALL THE
WARS and the financing of them and the profiteering of them as well. They
have never told the public the truth about anything, ANYTHING. Back with
more after this break.)

Hi
folks. I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix, going
through the techniques that are used on our MINDS as they go into a
concentrated effort, a concerted effort to give us all the same downloading
from different sources about the same topics leading us along a way of
thinking and bringing us to a conclusion and even having us argue with each other as we fall into ‘they should
or they shouldn’t’. You should never fall into these traps that are laid
right there for you. You should always say ‘what are they REALLY
after?’ When government’s after something it’s POWER, it’s power over
something. It’s always over YOU but in some other area. Whatever
they put on the books has a different agenda. Once it’s on the books, it
expands to include, include, include and so on. You’ve all seen it
before. Never fall for the EMOTIVE topics they give you… and fall into
the camps of ‘sometimes they should and sometimes they shouldn’t,’ like this
following article here. Remember, I’ll put the links up on my web site at
the end of the show. This is from Newsweek. It’s a typical PR stunt
to GIVE you conclusions and to get folk arguing over it. They fall into
the argument trap always.

(A:
Remember, Obama came out and said when his grandmother was dying or in the
hospital as terminal. He says, ‘I thought about the cost and so on.
Some of these people get artificial hips before they die and is it really not
worth it’ and blah, blah, blah and ‘the economic factor’ yap, yap, yap, yap,
yap as he followed his lines. This is the same guy that gave the go-ahead
– not that it mattered, it would have gone ahead regardless of who they put in
there – to give trillions of
dollars to the bankers who just robbed the people. But they want to take
money away from health care. This is the REAL reason for health
care. That’s why government wants in on it… so they can MANAGE your
life. That’s CONTROL of your life.
That’s why politics wants to get involved in managing YOU and your health care.
You know what the government does. They make LAWS and RULES that you must do’s and you must not do’s, that kind of
stuff. “Rethinking end-of-life care”… Isn’t it a coincidence all
this stuff comes after he talks about this? “Rethinking end-of-life
care”… remember I talked about “the pathways” stuff they have in Britain where
they called it “the pathway”? The extermination camp, basically, you’re
put into and they withdraw food and water and just let you die. Remember
that the United Nations has declared that a good global citizen is a good
producer/consumer? If you’re a pensioner, obviously, you’re now just a consumer. Don’t forget
it. This is all economics. Don’t fall into the EMOTIONAL parts of
what I’m about to read here. It’s written just like a soap. This is
how they go into the emotive thing, when they want you to fall into the emotive
thing.)

My mother wanted to
die, but the doctors wouldn't let her. At least that's the way it seemed to me
as I stood by her bed in an intensive-care unit at a hospital in Hilton Head,
S.C., five years ago. My mother was 79, a longtime smoker who was dying of
emphysema. (A: They have to find something to hit the smokers.
My grannies died in their late 90s and they chain-smoked plain cigarettes
- no tips, no filters on them - and they didn’t die of emphysema or
cancer.) She knew that her quality of life was increasingly tethered
to an oxygen tank, that she was losing her ability to get about, and that she
was slowly drowning. The doctors at her bedside were recommending various tests
and procedures to keep her alive, but my mother, with a certain firmness I
recognized, said no. She seemed puzzled and a bit frustrated that she had to be
so insistent on her own demise.

The hospital at my
mother's assisted-living facility was sustained by Medicare, which pays by the
procedure. I don't think the doctors were trying to be greedy by pushing more
treatments on my mother. That's just the way the system works. The doctors were
responding to the expectations of almost all patients. As a doctor friend of
mine puts it, "Americans want the best, they want the latest, and they
want it now." We expect doctors to make heroic efforts—especially to save
our lives and the lives of our loved ones.

The idea that we
might ration health care to seniors (or anyone else) is political anathema.
Politicians do not dare breathe the R word, lest they be accused—however
wrongly—of trying to pull the plug on Grandma. (A: Obama did say that
pretty well.) But the need to spend less money on the elderly at the
end of life is the elephant in the room in the health-reform debate. Everyone
sees it but no one wants to talk about it. (A: They have at the
top, let’s not kid ourselves.) At a more basic level, Americans are
afraid not just of dying, but of talking and thinking about death. Until
Americans learn to contemplate death as more than a scientific challenge to be
overcome, our health-care system will remain unfixable. (A: Then
it goes in to the economic factors. Going back to Julian Huxley, he’s
said remember, back in I think the 50s, ‘We have to teach the public to start
thinking of not just birth control, but of death control; they’re living too
long,’ he said. This is the same agenda. Don’t fall into poor old
granny who wants to die. Don’t
fall for this. It’s an argument, people: ‘Well she should,
no she shouldn’t; yes they should, no they shouldn’t.’ Don’t fall for
that. Look what they’re really after.)

Compared with other
Western countries, the United States has more health care—but, generally
speaking, not better health care. There is no way we can get control of costs,
which have grown by nearly 50 percent in the past decade, without finding a way
to stop overtreating patients. In his address to Congress, President Obama
spoke airily about reducing inefficiency, but he slid past the hard choices
that will have to be made to stop health care from devouring ever-larger slices
of the economy and tax dollar. (A: I don’t see why not.
They can throw trillions at bankers that rob you. Trillions of dollars
and get nothing back for it. At least when they’re taking care of the
elderly they create jobs and all the rest of it and they can live the rest of
their lives in a humane fashion.) A significant portion of the
savings will have to come from the money we spend on seniors at the end of life
because, as Willie Sutton explained about why he robbed banks, that's where the
money is. (A: So the elderly are getting it all. See how
they can target any group they want. They never target… and suddenly they
are the enemy and for those who fall into the emotional thing and can’t think
for themselves, they will be the enemy. They can point at any group at
all and they DO, by the way. They go from one group to the next until
they get their way. Now they’ve aimed their guns at the elderly.)

As President Obama
said, most of the uncontrolled growth in federal spending and the deficit comes
from Medicare (A: Uncontrolled growth… it’s because we got wiped out
by the banking boys. You know the guys who put him in there.);
nothing else comes close. Almost a third of the money spent by Medicare—about
$66.8 billion a year—goes to chronically ill patients in the last two years of
life. (A: What was it they first asked for, at the Federal
Reserve, $700 Billion? That was the first statement and when the woman
spoke from the Federal Reserve as to why they chose that amount she says ‘we
just wanted a nice big number.’ They say it would have to be a bailout…
now it’s into the TRILLIONS. Never mind that. They know the public have a
very short memory, very, very short indeed. And now they’re targeting the
elderly. And us too, getting us trained that you’re going to hit a
certain age and you’re going to walk in to the euthanasia clinic. Soylent
Green had that. Watch the movie Soylent Green. It was written
by ecologists. They first
called it Make Room, Make Room to try to say that the world will be so
overpopulated, folk will want to die.) This might seem obvious—of
course the costs come at the end, when patients are the sickest. But that can't
explain what researchers at Dartmouth have discovered: Medicare spends twice as
much on similar patients in some parts of the country as in others. The average
cost of a Medicare patient in Miami is $16,351; the average in Honolulu is
$5,311. In the Bronx, N.Y., it's $12,543. In Fargo, N.D., $5,738. (A:
So it’s all down to dollars and cents isn’t it? That’s what they bring
you down to. There’s the real motive here. More money… see if it’s
not getting spent on that, the government can use that to make bombs and things
and non-lethal weapons and use stealth fighters and these robot bombs they want
more and more of. They’ve got lots of good plans for this money if they
can just wipe out the elderly. Why can’t we all understand that?
What’s our problem? Boy!)

There’s
a very good site, Jane Burgermeister who came out against the Baxter Laboratory
initially when it supposedly… I think they call it a class 5 or 6 lab.
You don’t make mistakes at these laboratories. You DO NOT MAKE
MISTAKES. They have all these safeguards, fail-safes on top of fail-safes
and yet supposedly, it mixed 2 kinds of viruses together, a common flu virus
and I think it was the swine flu or the avian flu. If that had gone into
a human being, you’re now guaranteeing eventually as it’s spread from person to
person and we become the breeders for these viruses, if they join together they
could produce a hybrid or a killer disease. Luckily, they were stopped by
other agencies on the way. It didn’t get into the population. One
of the companies in Czechoslovakia injected it into ferrets – that’s what they
do to see – it killed them all. Baxter Laboratories… Baxter, part of the
IG Farben in World War II.

Jane
Burgermeister came out about that particular incident and said, you know,
they’re trying to kill the people. I think she was a licensed doctor and
I think she also lost her license for speaking out about this. She’s got
lawsuits out against different companies and the World Health Organization;
she’s trying to sue them. Good luck. I won’t happen, but she is trying. This is a great
website with a lot of information on it and a lot of links to articles on
vaccines, YouTube video archive stuff on it too, what’s in these particular
vaccines, not just hearsay but what’s actually in them and all the rest of
it. There are lots and lots of links as to what’s going on about the
flu. It’s also about Jane Burgermeister. It gives you her story and
what happened to her when she spoke out about this. She said herself
these kind of laboratories don’t make that kind of accident; it just doesn’t
happen. It doesn’t happen. It’s beyond gross negligence. It’s
beyond all that. It just can’t happen by accident. So I’ll put that
link up and check out the stuff that’s on the site.

As
we live, here they want to cull back the population and the cops are getting
every toy that they want. Toys for the boys… Until it’s farcical
the money that’s getting spent by them and the military too. This is from
The Mail Online.

It's a bird! It's a plane!

No... it's the flying Florida police in their new
bullet-proof paragliders

By Mail Foreign Service / 18th September
2009

In yet another novel
innovation in police transport, a specially-trained Florida force is to take to
the skies in motorised, bullet-proof paragliders.

The officers of the
Palm Bay police force are to fly 400ft up, equipped with radios, cameras and
GPS satellite systems as they patrol the ground. The trikes the officers ride
in are bullet-proof.

Codenamed Operation (A:
Listen to this. They love acronyms.) S.O.A.R, (Search Operations
Aerial Response) (A: Do you even wonder if they ever grow
up? Do they really? Are they really just stuck in a certain age
there somewhere?), the four-strong team will provide assistance to officers
on the ground as a cheaper alternative to helicopters.

With one £18,000
unit in their possession and another more modest £8000 gliding backpack to
come, the officers of Palm Bay are all set to make history on November 1st of
this year.

'There is to my mind
no other paragliding police in the world,' said Lieutenant Joe Eakins, who is
leading the Florida-based unit.

'Like most police
over the world at some point we require aerial assistance and this provides
that.' (A: So there you go.)

Able to fly to a
maximum of 10,000 feet and up to 30 mph, the officers of S.O.A.R have been
training since April to gain the approval of the Federal Aviation Authority in
the United States. (A: They’re putting a bunch of these up to
have fun over the beaches. Toys for the boys eh? Toys for the
boys. But it’s okay, taxpayers pay for everything… and there’s never a
quibble about that. Never a quibble about that is there?)

There’s
never a quibble about NASA either and all the secret stuff they’re up to that’s
throwing millions and trillions of dollars worth of stuff into space.
NO. That’s like a… ‘Oh, no, we must go ahead with scientific research,
it’s important for progress.’ I wonder who defines progress. Let’s
kill the elderly instead? All they have to do now is convince the general
public this is normal and it will be normal before you know it. You’ll
hit a certain age - just like Logan’s Run - and your time is up; you’re
called in.

This
article is Guardian.co.uk.

Sceptics seize on climate cooling model

guardian.co.uk – News /
George Monbiot's blog

Research suggesting
that global temperatures may fall (A: Actually it is falling as they
know.) is being used by deniers (A: Denier… oh, you’re a
‘denier’.) and sceptics to dismiss the entire canon of climate science

Could it be true
that global temperatures will fall before they rise? That's the thrust of a
presentation at last week's World Climate conference. (A: It’s
so funny. With straight faces they came out and said, ‘This is part of
the warming phase; the world cools for years before it gets warm, so we’re
going into a cooling phase but it’s still really under the warming
phase.’ See.) Mojib Latif of Kiel University in Germany
suggested that cooling caused by natural factors could suppress global
temperatures for several years, after which they will start to rise
again. (A: Maybe.)

His presentation,
first reported by the eagle-eyed Fred Pearce in the New Scientist, has been
seized upon by sceptics and deniers (A: Deniers.) all over the
blogosphere. It was picked up this morning by the BBC's Today programme, which
invited my old friend Philip Stott (who spends his time championing such
dubious productions as The Great Global Warming Swindle and Michael Crichton's
State of Fear) to raise questions about the global warming thesis.

Professor Latif
suggested that the long-term warming trend could be masked - perhaps for as
long as 10 or 20 years - by a temporary cooling caused by natural fluctuations
in currents and temperatures called the North Atlantic oscillation.
"Thereafter," he told the Today programme, "temperatures will
pick up again and continue to warm." (A: Maybe.)

Could Latif be
right? Who knows? As far as I can tell, his paper has not yet been published,
so other scientists haven't had the opportunity to see how strong it is. (A:
They have to buy a special computer and feed it in. They’ll preprogram it
to give them the right information
and then they can say, ‘see, we’re right.’)

IT’S
ALL RUBBISH TO GET US TO CHANGE OUR ENTIRE WAY OF LIVING. GOING
GREEN, as they call it, the new religion
that Gorbachev talked about that will RULE mankind with its appointed
priesthoods, mind you, the new scientists of ecology: ‘Too many
people,’ blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. It’s all part of it. It’s
all part of the same thing. That’s all. You won’t get any truth out
of the media. The media’s kept us in the dark for as long as I’ve been
alive and my parents and grandparents. That’s their job. That’s
their job.

Believe
it or not, ugh, when Scotland goes crazy over the swine flu stuff, you know
that the boys in the Scottish Parliament are just on the paymasters of the same
old country. This is from The Scotsman newspaper.

Mass swine flu coffins warning

Published Date: 17 September 2009 / By
David Maddox

MINISTERS (A:
That’s politicians.) have been urged to have thousands of cardboard coffins
ready for mass deaths should swine flu take a turn for the worse. (A:
They’re cheap there. Cardboard coffins.
I wonder if it’s raining too? What good would they be? Oh,
its biodegradable, that’s why. I’ll be back with more after these
messages.)

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I
didn’t realize that the hour had just flown in like that plus I have another
show after this one. I’ll go to the phones now and grab Cody from
Oregon. Are you there Cody?

Cody: Yeah, I’m here Alan. Thanks for taking
my call. I read Out of Control by Vince White, a book that you
recommended and wow that was very insightful to see how controlled just that
band was by the Music Industry. It seemed like they were really just
pushing the culture like you always talk about. It kind of made me think
that a band like that that’s supposed to be rebelling against the system and
everything and they’re that far controlled, it made me wonder how bad the
mainstream bands were.

Alan: Actually, they’re all vetted. It’s not
so much the bands themselves; it’s those that manage them that guide them
along a particular track. They get them or at least they try to give the
appearance to the public that they’re all involved in a political/socialist
movement. That was the whole intention of it. Whereas the guys
themselves, certainly Vince, wasn’t in to socialism at all.

Cody: Right, yeah. In a lot of ways they’re
just prostitutes by just not really sticking to their morals or their values
and just selling whatever is out there to sell.

Alan: That’s what generally happens with ALL the
big bands out there. I can remember when the Beatles were given, I think
it was one of the Orders of the British Empire or something from the
Queen. After Britain had done something to some other country, they took
them back and threw them back. At least they had the guts to say, you
know you can have this stuff back; we’re not proud of serving you. But
you don’t see that anymore today. Not today.

Cody: Not a whole lot. Then another thing
that’s kind of along the same lines talking about music here. I was going
through a music theory book that I had and I ran across an old buddy of ours,
Old Pythagoras. It said that he was responsible for making the chromatic
scale. He basically cut it up into 12 intervals.

Alan: That’s right. Through
mathematics… And he measured them too. In the middle ages, they
reconstructed those scales using the box and the one string method and got the
harmonics and that’s how they came out with the medieval music for the churches.

Cody: Wow. Interesting number they
chose. So would the 13, for the octave,
would that represent the hidden master?

Alan: In a sense it would. There’s always the 13.

Cody: I just heard that from your talk when you
were talking about how the number 13 and then the number 12 and what they
represented. I was kind of interesting. I heard that from your old
CDs.

Alan: That’s why you have the number 13 all across
logos that you see. You’ll see them inverted on their side and that’s actually
the McDonald’s logo, for instance, that some towns have. Just turn it on
its side until the 1 is at the bottom on the horizontal and you got the 3 above
it like and M. That’s 13, regardless if it’s McDonalds. You’ll see
towns use that too for the logos as well. Supposedly representing 2 hills
or something and there’s always a line underneath it. It’s a 13.

Cody: Wow. The esoteric is just
everywhere. Once you start finding out a little bit about it, it just
starts popping up out at you everywhere.

Alan: It IS everywhere. I live next to a
train track and I watch all these freight trains go by and every car has a
Masonic logo on them from every company.

Cody: Wow. You know one thing that that book
said also is it said that Pythagoras wasn’t necessarily one person. They
said that it might have been a group of people.

Alan: I’m sure it was. He and others were
trained in Egypt and they went back. He went to Croton actually, it was a
province of Greece but it was based in Italy, and started a school up there
until it was burned down by locals who knew what he was up to.
Thanks for calling.

Cody: Thank you. It was nice talking to you.

Alan: Bye now.

Well
that’s it for tonight folks. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada,
it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.