[June 23, 2016] Print This Post Print This Post Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism,
Pediatricians Do BY J.B. HANDLEY If a doctor sticks six vaccines into
a child while the child is taking antibiotics for an ear infection and Tylenol
for a cold, he’s not a doctor, he’s a criminal, and should be hauled into jail
on the spot for assault and battery. If the child also happens to have eczema,
long-term diarrhea, and has missed a milestone or two, perhaps the charge should
be attempted murder.
...Blue Cross will give your pediatrician $400 per child that
has received 100% of the 25 vaccines they recommend by the age of 2.
Incredible!!! Pediatric practices, according
to this study, average 1,546 patients per doctor. This means that a
5-doctor pediatric practice, if they reach 100% compliance on vaccinations, will
receive a bonus of just over $3,000,000 (that’s not a typo, my math is right,
that’s $3 million bucks!!). Does your pediatrician have a conflict in
considering the benefits and risks of vaccines? Answer: You’re damn right they
do!!! More isn’t better?

[April 14, 2016] Who should parents trust, Robert DeNiro or Dr. Ari Brown?
(Because one of them has to be lying) BY JB HANDLEY One of the most
prominent studies ever cited to prove “vaccines do not cause autism,” and we
have a sitting senior scientist turned whistleblower at the CDC who managed this
very study referring to it as “the worst study ever”, “criminal”, and this same
CDC whistleblower goes on to imply that the lead author of the study, Ian Lipkin — the
same guy who Jane Rosenthal consulted before removing Vaxxed from the Tribeca
film festival — mismanaged the funding of the study and made threats in order to
get more funding. Incredible!

[2016 April 13] What’s with DeNiro’s Tribeca co-founder, Jane Rosenthal? BY JB
HANDLEY “I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus,
and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus
science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in
its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of
scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already
settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or
other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.
“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to
do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the
contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means
that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.
In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results.
The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with
the consensus.
There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s
consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
“… Finally, I would remind you to notice where the claim of consensus is
invoked. Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid
enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E = mc². Nobody says
the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to
anyone to speak that way.””

[2016 April 7] Backfire: how a pharma-funded “Listserv” and censorship are
turning the movie Vaxxed into a worldwide phenomenon BY JB HANDLEY
When the Immunization Action Coalition reaches out to journalists to protest the
showing of Vaxxed at the Tribeca Film Festival, they aren’t doing so because
they share values with the CDC and vaccine makers, they are just the CDC and
vaccine makers wearing a mask.
...If the “listserve” hadn’t jumped into action and turned
Vaxxed into an international controversy in the media, it likely would have had
it’s single showing at Tribeca and moved on into obscurity. But that’s not how
it happened. Attempts to silence the film do nothing but reveal the corrupt
underbelly of paid propagandists who use pressure to silence the truths the
movie reveals. Our children have been deeply harmed, including my own son, and
something needs to change. Americans don’t like corruption. Americans don’t like
fraud. And Americans certainly don’t like being told they can’t see a movie.

OK, let me be clear: I think Paul Offit is a
blowhard liar, a vaccine profiteer and apologist, and every time he opens his
mouth he disrespects my son. When the final chapter is finally written on this
man-made autism epidemic, I will do everything within my power to ensure that
Offit is remembered by history as one of the most sinister, dishonest,
well-funded talking heads pharma ever produced, and that his efforts served to
afflict so many children with autism who may otherwise have avoided it. In one
of the most absurd snowjobs ever put on the media, Offit, a doctor who has never
seen a patient with autism, never treated autism, and never published a study
about autism, is somehow considered to be an expert on autism. Given his status
as a multi-millionaire vaccine patent holder who has had much of his career
supported by Merck, this isn’t just absurd, it’s highway robbery, and yet the
media persists, and rarely even mentions Offit’s Mount Everest-sized pile of
conflicts.
Best of Age of Autism: Paul Offit and the Original Sin

[2011 Jan] Paul Offit and the
“Original Sin” of Autism By J.B. Handley OK, let me be clear: I think
Paul Offit is a blowhard liar, a vaccine profiteer and apologist, and every time
he opens his mouth he disrespects my son. When the final chapter is finally
written on this man-made autism epidemic, I will do everything within my power
to ensure that Offit is remembered by history as one of the most sinister,
dishonest, well-funded talking heads pharma ever produced, and that his efforts
served to afflict so many children with autism who may otherwise have avoided
it.
In one of the most absurd snowjobs ever put on the media,
Offit, a doctor who has never seen a patient with autism, never treated autism,
and never published a study about autism, is somehow considered to be an expert
on autism. Given his status as a multi-millionaire vaccine patent holder who has
had much of his career supported by Merck, this isn’t just absurd, it’s highway
robbery, and yet the media persists, and rarely even mentions Offit’s Mount
Everest-sized pile of conflicts.

[2010 March] First Fraud: Dr.
Poul Thorsen and the original “Danish Study” By J.B. Handley It’s hard
to put into words how dishonest and outrageous a study this is, and I knew after
reading it that we were in for a long fight: if scientists will lie this
explicitly and call it a study and if Pediatrics will publish something this
dishonest, they are playing to win at all costs. .....Danish children receive
75% less Thimerosal than American children, they receive immunizations when they
are older, and the U.S. autism rate is TEN TIMES the rate of Denmark (Denmark is
1 in 1,600, U.S. is 1 in 166). .....Of the seven co-authors of the study, three
had received direct funding from the CDC on vaccine-safety related projects. Two
of the authors were employees of Statens Serum Institute, a Danish vaccine
manufacturer.
..The public health establishment seems to have a simple strategy: get anything
published, and then spin the hell out of it and confuse the public, and they
perhaps never did it better than with this original “Danish study” which is
still cited as proof by many that “vaccines don’t cause autism.”

[2009 Oct] Dr. Paul Offit, The Autism
Expert. Doesn't See Patients with Autism? By J.B. Handley Not
only is Ms. Pisani’s conflict hidden from the reader, but her actual
quote is a complete fabrication. Ms. Pisani has been advocating vaccines
for children for YEARS, everything in her quote is a lie -- she wasn’t
questioning the right thing to do when Offit’s book came along. A liar
with a conflict of interest -- how perfect!
....The lack of humanity, the lack of interest in recovering children,
is this guy really a doctor? It would be like the Marlboro man shitting
on a non-traditional treatment for lung cancer, because the treatment
uses natural substances to pull tobacco tar out of people’s lungs. It’s
horrible, repugnant, and so profoundly disrespectful of parents who ARE
seeing recovery through biomedical treatment, I really don’t have the
words to castigate Offit to the proper degree. In fact, it’s even worse
than that. Offit and his comrades are actually rooting AGAINST recovery
for our children, because if recovery from autism is actually possible
through biomedical intervention, then autism is environmentally caused.
And, if it’s environmentally caused, then the guy who will die known as
“Mr. Vaccine” is in very deep kimchi, and his tombstone may actually end
up reading, “Mr. Autism Epidemic Facilitator.”
.....Offit made up a conversation that never took place and blended
something I wrote on a public message board for an entirely different
reason to serve his own purpose......Our case wasn’t a slam-dunk. We’d
proven Offit had lied, that was easy.

[2009 Feb] Unvaccinated
Children Madness By J.B. HandleyOne final
point: the mainstream will never do a study of unvaccinated kids. They already
fear what it will show, and the results for them would likely be cataclysmic.
Their best bet is to invent reasons the study can't be done.

Quotes
"Whenever I meet a pediatrician I ask them a simple question: what percentage of
your revenue come from vaccine administration? The number always astounds me.
The answers I get are that anywhere from 60–80% of their revenue comes from
giving vaccines. Imagine that."

If a doctor sticks six vaccines into a child while the child is taking
antibiotics for an ear infection and Tylenol for a cold, he’s not a doctor, he’s
a criminal, and should be hauled into jail on the spot for assault and battery.
If the child also happens to have eczema, long-term diarrhea, and has missed a
milestone or two, perhaps the charge should be attempted murder.
...Blue Cross will give your pediatrician $400 per child that
has received 100% of the 25 vaccines they recommend by the age of 2.
Incredible!!! Pediatric practices, according
to this study, average 1,546 patients per doctor. This means that a
5-doctor pediatric practice, if they reach 100% compliance on vaccinations, will
receive a bonus of just over $3,000,000 (that’s not a typo, my math is right,
that’s $3 million bucks!!). Does your pediatrician have a conflict in
considering the benefits and risks of vaccines? Answer: You’re damn right they
do!!! More isn’t better?[June
23, 2016] Print This Post Print This Post Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism,
Pediatricians Do BY J.B. HANDLEY

Actually, given my experience among people with "credentials," anyone who
begins a sentence lauding theirs and has more honorific acronyms than actual
words in the clause has to go out of their way to prove to me they're not a
total egotistical blowhard. I grew up in and around academia and a string of
letters and periods following someone's name doesn't impress me. It just shows a
dedication to long hours of advanced education, memorization, ass-kissing,
turning off critical thinking as you learn to mindlessly accept everything your
professor or textbook says, and going into tens if not a hundred thousand
dollars of debt. Also, especially in the medical school spectrum, ambition and a
strong, healthy God-complex are more desirable traits than intellect and a
system of basic ethics. 60s comedian Mort Saul,
commenting after meeting General Westmoreland, the head troop commander during
most of the Vietnam era, said something along the lines of "He had row after row
of glittering metals. It was dazzling, amazing even. Very impressive... if
you're 12."[May 2008]
DAVID GORSKI, M.D.: THE WORLDWIDE WANKER OF "WOO"By J.B. Handley

‘You can't have missed 97 percent of the children in the
'80s who had autism. They're trying to get the public to believe that kids who
spin in circles, don't speak, don't socialize, can't go to the bathroom by
themselves all existed in our public high schools and elementary schools in the
'80s but only today have gotten a proper diagnosis. It's incomprehensible.’
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/vaccines/interviews/handley.html

If we're right, this makes the tobacco mess look like a
rounding error -- not only the scale of destruction, but you have children
involved with lifelong conditions that require care. So not only do the major
pharmaceutical companies take an enormous and potentially fatal hit, but you
have the costs associated with treating an entire generation of children, many
of whose parents can't treat them past a certain age, and you have the careers
that will be destroyed across the board from the pharmaceutical companies
themselves to the entire leadership of the AAP to many pediatricians who spoke
up to the entire public health establishment at both CDC and NIH. The scale of
destruction, if we're actually right, is so enormous I think it helps people
understand why the debate is so fierce, why it's taking so long and why they're
fighting so hard.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/vaccines/interviews/handley.html

alyric, you said, "It appears that Dr Gorski is to be congratulated. Surely
the highest compliment to one's activities is a 100% ad hominem invective
because there is nothing else one could say. Way to go Orac!"You mean like this quote from Orac?"I'm not
going to discuss Olmsted's commentary on these abstracts any more because
Olmsted has proven time and time again that he doesn't know what science is, how
it works, or what he is talking about. Besides, in response to tweaking over at
the Autism Blog, the merry band of antivaccinationists over at AoA kindly posted
all three of the actual abstracts that were presented at the International
Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR). Why bother with Olmsted's uninformed rants
and mischaracterizations when I can cut through his obfuscation and go straight
to the source?"Does anyone else love bashing
hypocrites as much as I do?[May 2008]
DAVID GORSKI, M.D.: THE WORLDWIDE WANKER OF "WOO"By J.B. Handley