Three
bombs exploded on three separate trains within fifty seconds of each
other in London’s transportation system during the morning rush hour
at 8:50 am on 7 July 2005. The bombs exploded simultaneously on three
separate trains. A fourth bomb exploded on a bus in Tavistock Square
at 9:47 am which was carrying passengers who had been evacuated from
nearby Underground stations. It is a tragedy – there are 52 confirmed
dead and 700 injured and many people are still reported as missing.
Many of the injured were foreign nationals which made communications
difficult.

It
is the single most deadly act of terrorism to occur in the United
Kingdom since the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 which took place on
21 December 1988 over Lockerbie, Scotland. Two Hundred and seventy
people died as a result of the Lockerbie attack, 189 of them were
Americans, the most to die in a single incident until 11 September
2001. As far as London - these bombings constituted the worst attack
in London since a V2 rocket attack of 27 March 1945 which killed 131
people.

CCTV
(close circuit TV) footage is in the process of being examined by
the police who are also looking for forensic evidence. Unfortunately,
according to an official report, the cameras had not been working
since June. There is no evidence to indicate that these bombings were
suicide attacks. Most likely, the bombs were placed in a concealed
area on the floor of the trains and bus.

This
well coordinated incident necessitated the immediate closing of the
London Underground network as well as the streets adjacent to the
relevant stations. Those responsible have not been identified but
the general consensus is that they may be linked to an al-Qaeda terrorist
cell established in the United Kingdom.

The
circumstances of this attack are extremely interesting: the bombings
occurred:

During the first full day of the 31st G8 summit in Perthshire,
Scotland.

A day after London was chosen to host the 2012 Summer Olympics.

Two days after Abu Hamza’s trial began in London.

During an antiterrorism exercise based on multiple simultaneous
attacks

When the surveillance cameras were not working.

A
few hours after the attacks the BBC News reported that a 200 hundred
page document claiming responsibility had been discovered on a web
site allegedly operated by al-Qaeda associates. Apparently a “new
guest” using the name "Nur al-Iman" and representing a faction calling
themselves "Secret Organization—al-Qaeda in Europe" also claimed responsibility
by posting a message on the al-Qal3ah
("The Castle") Internet forum. They assert that the “raid” is retaliation
for the British complicity in the 2003 Iraq invasion and the United
States invasion of Afghanistan.

Is
al-Qaeda responsible for the London attack as well as 9/11? Or is
this the Reichstag
Fire of London? How will it affect Bush’s “war on terror”? Will
he continue to behave like America’s tough “cowboy” by sending others
off to war or will our troops return home and give the Iraqis the
responsibility for their country?

"Terrorism
is the best political weapon, for nothing drives people harder than
a fear of sudden death." - Adolf Hitler

There
are two interesting parallels between the London attack and 9/11:
although we had security cameras, whatever images were captured were
confiscated. It might be very revealing to know exactly why the British
cameras malfunctioned.

The
other similarity is that:

“On
11 September 2001 the Air Force was in its second day of annual war
game drills, titled VIGILANT GUARDIAN, designed to test national air
response systems, which incidentally involved hijacking scenarios.
In addition the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) which is staffed
by military and CIA personnel, and is in charge of most American spy
satellites, was running a drill for the scenario of an errant aircraft
crashing into its headquarters. NRO headquarters also happens to be
located just four miles from Washington’s Dulles airport – where Flight
77 (the flight said to have hit the Pentagon) originated...”[1]

The
very first few questions that an observant person should ask are:
Exactly who benefits from both the attacks on 9/11 and London? What
freedoms will be lost in both England
and America as a result of these attacks? Will this event serve as
greater justification to install pervasive and invasive CCTV as they
have in Chicago? Did the British have foreknowledge of this raid?

Now
to the crux of the real issue that has little to do with the London
Tragedy which may have simply served as a diversion from what was
occurring in the G8 Summit. Why is our president pondering worldly
problems in Gleneagles, Scotland when we have sufficient problems
here at home that he is completely ignoring? Why is there so little
attention focused on these “secret” summit meetings? The London authorities
recognize the presence of the "Secret Organization—al-Qaeda in Europe"
with the astute implications that secrecy is automatically suspect.
That same application should be made regarding the G8 Summits. Why
doesn’t the media focus attention on those meetings? A more effective
and citizen safe application for CCTV might be at such events. Let’s
concentrate the cameras on the government rather than on the citizens
who are just trying to live day to day in spite of their respective
governments.

Following
is a brief synopsis of what our illustrious leader, without congressional
or voter approval did to us at the G8 Summit. The italicized, alternate
font comments are the official reports of the summit attendees:

Terrorist
Attacks on London:

They
offered profound condolences to the victims and their families as
they condemned the barbaric attacks on London.

“We
have not allowed violence to disrupt the work of this Summit. The
terrorists have not and will not succeed. As well as our work on
poverty and climate change, we resolved to intensify our work on
counter terrorism.”

This
is obviously an ongoing commitment on Bush’s part to continue the
barbaric attacks on the civilians of Iraq while squandering our military
and our money. After wards, we will use some more of our money to
rebuild the infrastructure that we have destroyed.

Climate
Change:

“We
were joined for our discussion on climate change and the global
economy by the leaders of Brazil, China, India, Mexico, and South
Africa and by the heads of the International Energy Agency, International
Monetary Fund, United Nations, World Bank, and the World Trade Organization.”

I
doubt that Bush chatted with Vicente Fox about the continuing barrage
of Mexican citizens invading our country which deprives our citizens
of their sovereignty and resources. Considering the heads of all of
the above New World Order proponents we most assuredly know that Bush
does not have the best interests of our nation in mind. While righteously
angry citizens petition congress to reject CAFTA, the congruent Bush
is hobnobbing with the head of the World Trade Organization.

Sustainable
Development (see video 'Liberty
or Sustainable Development') means tyrannical control of every
citizen and all the earth’s resources by those “special elite” who
have or will wrench control of the social, political, economic and
environmental concerns within every country. This is what our president
is pursuing in spite of what he says. His daddy was a New
World Order proponent and so is little junior.

“We
resolved to take urgent action to meet the challenges we face. The
Gleneagles Plan of Action which we have agreed demonstrates our commitment.
We will take measures to develop markets for clean energy technologies,
to increase their availability in developing countries, and to help
vulnerable communities adapt to the impact of climate
change.”

Most
assuredly citizens will be making most of the radical changes in their
life style to prevent these climate crises. This enforced change will
affect how we travel, our occupations, everyday comforts such as air
conditioning and heating. This will equalize almost everyone, except
the ruling elite, to the lowest lifestyle level.

“Our
discussions mark the beginning of a new Dialogue between the G8 nations
and other countries with significant energy needs, consistent with
the aims and principles of the UN Framework Convention on Climate
Change. This will explore how best to exchange technology, reduce
emissions, and meet our energy needs in a sustainable way, as we implement
and build on the Plan of Action.”

This
really sounds like the communistic approach on the developed countries
sharing their resources with the countries whose leaders have already,
through orchestrated planning, stripped their own country’s resources
to the detriment of their citizens. The New World Order has accomplished
this stripping through their minions. The viable resources are or
will be centralized then frugally rationed.

“We
will advance the global effort to tackle climate change at the UN
Climate Change Conference in Montreal later this year. Those of us
who have ratified the Kyoto
Protocol remain committed to it, and will continue to work to
make it a success.”

Global
warming is a crisis generated myth perpetrated by the New World Order
proponents.

Africa
and Development

“The
African leaders set out their personal commitment, reaffirmed strongly
at this week’s African Union summit, to drive forward plans to reduce
poverty and promote economic growth.” … show zero tolerance for corruption…

“The
G8 in return agreed to a comprehensive plan to support Africa’s progress.
This is set out in our separate statement today. We agreed:”

to provide extra resources for Africa’s peacekeeping forces

to give enhanced support for greater democracy (tyranny by the
masses)

to help fight corruption and return stolen assets

to boost investment in health and education

to take action to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, TB and other killer
diseases

to stimulate growth

to improve the investment climate

to make trade work for Africa, including by helping to build Africa’s
capacity to trade and working

to mobilize the extra investment in infrastructure which is needed
for business

“The
G8 leaders agreed to back this plan with substantial extra resources
for countries which have strong national development plans and are
committed to good governance, democracy and transparency.”

This
means the incompliant tyrannical government leaders will be replaced
with obedient tyrannical puppets. See Saddam Hussein for references
about this.

“We
have agreed to double aid for Africa by 2010. Aid for all developing
countries will increase, according to the OECD,
by around $50bn per year by 2010, of which at least $25bn extra per
year for Africa.”

This
is Communism 101 designed to look like we are “sharing” rather than
redistributing our wealth. Only the middle class, or what’s left of
it, will be involved in this redistribution. The elite elected will
retain their resources, their pension plans, their cushy government
positions and any and all monies received from pharmaceutical companies
or lobbyists.

“The
G8 has also agreed that all of the debts owed by eligible heavily
indebted poor countries to IDA,
the International Monetary Fund
and the African
Development Fund should be cancelled, as set out in our Finance
Ministers agreement on 11 June. We also welcomed the Paris
Club decision to write off around $17 billion of Nigeria's debt.”

The
G8 and African leaders agreed that if implemented these measures and
the others set out in our comprehensive plan could:

double the size of Africa’s economy and trade by 2015

deliver increased domestic and foreign investment

lift tens of millions of people out of poverty every year

save millions of lives a year

get all children into primary school

deliver free basic health care and primary education for all

provide as close as possible to universal access to treatment
for AIDS by 2010

generate employment and other opportunities for young people

bring about an end to conflict in Africa.

This
all sounds wonderfully magical and could be obtained by the hard work
of the citizens in each country without heavy handed government control.
Individuals have an inherent love of liberty and can excel best in
a free capitalistic environment. The African nations have always been
enslaved by the greed and wickedness of their leaders and so-called
foreign friends. They have rich natural resources that should benefit
their own citizens. AIDS
is a manmade disease that further enslaved the Africans. Here we go
again – complicit, duplicitous men have created a problem that will
now take unlimited resources to clean up after the disease has sufficiently
reduced the African population to a preconceived figure.

Global
Economy, Oil and Trade

“We
agreed to redouble our efforts to achieve a successful conclusion
across the whole of the Doha
Development Agenda. We saw this as vital to drive growth and boost
incomes across the world, and a necessary element of our work to reduce
global poverty. “We and our emerging economy partners agreed to inject
the necessary political momentum into the discussion to ensure an
outline agreement by the WTO
Hong Kong Ministerial in December, and a final agreement in 2006.”

“We
reaffirmed our commitment to open markets more widely to trade in
agricultural goods, industrial goods and services, and in agriculture
to reduce trade distorting domestic subsidies and eliminate all forms
of export subsidies by a credible end date. We also committed to address
products of interest to Least Developed Countries in the negotiations,
and to ensure Least Developed Countries have the flexibility to decide
their own economic strategies.”

NAFTA
(1993), CAFTA & FTAA – These last two must not be passed. We must
get this country out of the WTO. Are there any courageous people out
there who will run for congress? We are following the New World Order
agenda, not the agenda of the American people.

“We
issued statements on the global economy and oil, trade, and on action
to reduce Intellectual
Property Right piracy and counterfeiting.”

Regional
Issues and Proliferation

“We
reaffirmed that the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
their delivery systems, together with international terrorism, remain
the pre-eminent threats to international peace and security. We reaffirmed
our commitments and called on all States to uphold in full international
norms on non-proliferation and to meet their arms control and disarmament
obligations. … We expressed particular concern about the threat of
proliferation in North Korea and Iran.”

Leaders of the G-8 Nations, 2005

Of
course, Iran was mentioned in conjunction with weapons of mass destruction
in as much as that is Bush’s next military objective. State arms control
also means personal arms control. This will be an affront to our second
amendment rights.

“We
also issued statements on the Middle East Peace Process, the Broader
Middle East and North Africa Initiative, the Indian Ocean disaster,
and counter-proliferation, and a progress report on the Secure and
Facilitated Travel Initiative (SAFTI).”

Deanna Spingola
has been a quilt designer and is the author of two books. She has traveled
extensively teaching and lecturing on her unique methods. She has always
been an avid reader of non-fiction works designed to educate rather than
entertain. She is active in family history research and lectures on that
topic. Currently she is the director of the local Family History Center.
She has a great interest in politics and the direction of current government
policies, particularly as they relate to the Constitution.

There
are two interesting parallels between the London attack and 9/11: although
we had security cameras, whatever images were captured were confiscated.
It might be very revealing to know exactly why the British cameras malfunctioned.