Third, I recently visited Columbia Generating Station, in Richland Washington. As I wrote earlier this month: "I am on travel right now. I am currently in a town that has a lovely park: Leslie Groves Park. Guess the town."

The town is Richland Washington, and the people at Columbia Generating Station were wonderful hosts. I thoroughly enjoyed visiting the station and taking a tour of the plant. Therefore, today is a good day for a Columbia Generating Station dry cask storage video.

5 comments:

My only two beefs about nuclear industry flicks like this is that it should be stressed more that the sheer massiveness of the casks are their own security deterrence against terrorists, who aren't exactly going to crash the gates and tuck one under their arm and scurry away. I would've liked a LOT more stress that there's still a lot of useful fuel bottled up in that "waste". A great perspective lesson about the amount being generated should be compared to the mountainous city dumps New Yorkers or Bostonian drive by on their interstates.

I think the casks are basically the same, though of course they will differ because different bundles are longer or whatever.

That is a very interesting question about moving them to Yucca. I don't know the answer. I think the casks could be moved by train, or the fuel could be repacked into traveling casks. The French move used fuel to a central fuel pool, and their casks travel by train. Their fuel is fresher and hotter when moved, and the casks look like porcupines, in order to shed heat.

Cask design is essentially identical. The bundle size is different between BWR and PWR. They are the same length, but PWR fuel is about 4x the area. So there may be small differences in the rack inside the cask holding fuel in place.

Cask specifications were specifically chosen to allow the casks to be transported to and stored in Yucca Mountain with no additional "re-casking".