From ...
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.54.122.107!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail
From: Erik Naggum
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Understanding Erik Naggum
Date: 09 Oct 2002 03:54:58 +0000
Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <3243124498000388@naggum.no>
References: <3242810821019218@naggum.no> <3DA05E22.8040401@nyc.rr.com> <3DA06B05.6060306@nyc.rr.com> <3DA0C55F.1050001@nyc.rr.com> <3DA1568E.1070707@nyc.rr.com> <3242998337739990@naggum.no> <3243027599800228@naggum.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1034135698 7964 129.240.65.5 (9 Oct 2002 03:54:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Oct 2002 03:54:58 GMT
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:43504
* Coby Beck
| It does not, btw, indicate either way how you effect lurkers but I have
| no way of guessing that either, short of projecting my own reactions on
| others (which you correctly reject as unreliable) or using anecdotal
| evidence from my discussions with former fellow students/colleagues (also
| unreliable).
Lurkers write me all the time to tell me they appreciate something I have
written. Do you seriously think that I would ignore the insanely hostile
rantings and ravings of you feel-good jerks if it were not for a constant
flow of appreciation? The fact is that you, Erann Gat, and the other
extremely hostile people do nothing but destroy this environment.
Without your stupid ranting and raving about my behavior, there would be
approximately 5% as much noise as there currently is. Your incessant
need to tell people how they should feel and speculate on how others are
feeling when they can handle themselves just fine is so goddamn insane
that you cannot be taken seriously.
| Life is full of things that can not be proven by logic, my confidence in
| my own judgements of people is not unshakeable but I am comfortable that
| my perceptions are reasonably accurate.
Of course you are. You keep claiming things about me that are so insane
as to be impossible, and you obviously do this with the confidence of a
madman who has long since rejected reality.
| FWIW, my desire is not for people to be nice, it is for them to not be
| assholes.
You never speak out against the people who are assholes towards me, so
this is so unspeakably unjust that you really come across as one of the
most unethical people I know of.
| And there is nothing condescending about ceasing a discussion that is a
| dead-end and calling a discussion dead-end is not a value judgement on
| the participants so your perception of condescension comes from yourself
| not me.
Was there any part of what I wrote that you had any comprehension
problems with? Why do you repeat what I said in a way that suggests I
did not say it? You are such a /dishonest/ jerk. I said "I find" about
how I saw your behavior. What on earth are you thinking with to manage
to have to repeat this the way you do? You are so goddamn /indecent/.
Of all the people on this newsgroup who keep attacking me, you are
certainly one of the worst assholes. *PUKE*
--
Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway
Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder.
Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.