Thursday, May 3, 2018

From time to time Tucker Carlson provides his viewers with a
special treat. That treat is named Cathy Areu. Carlson calls her his special Sherpa,
someone who travels up the mountains of politically correct thinking and
reports back.

The irony is palpable, though Areu seems actually to believe
what she spews. If she does, this makes her a zealous mental midget. With very
big hair, incidentally.

If we did not hear it with our ears, we might imagine that
those of us who denounce the dumbing down of American education by a brain dead
educational establishment are making it up. The facts themselves, measured in
educational outcomes, are so bad that, sad to say, we are not.

One understands the method behind this dereliction. If you
keep students dumb and dependent you will have a much easier time controlling
their minds. The truth is that if you want to learn how to think
you should read writings by people who are great thinkers. You should avoid
writers who cannot think. And you should not expect to learn how to
think by reading the labels on soup cans.

Similarly, if you want to learn how to write, you should
read the writings of people who are great writers. Reading mediocre, clotted
prose will teach you to write sub-literate prose.

It makes no difference that they look like you or your mother, or that they do not resemble anyone in your family or in your identity politics
cult. Great writing is great writing. Learn to live with it. Especially, learn
to learn from it.

Obviously, this countercultural argument turns into fairy dust the minute
you ask whether a non-Christian should ever study Newtonian physics, given that
Newton was a pious Christian? And should a non-Jew study the theory of
relativity, given that Einstein was a Jew. We recall a time when books written
be Jews, regardless of merit of quality, were thrown on bonfires, the better to
purge alien thoughts from pure German minds.

On last night’s Tucker Carlson Tonight show, leftist Sherpa Cathy
Areu weighed in on the case of one Keziah Daum. Daum, you see, posed in her
prom dress on her Twitter account. The dress was a cultural product of China.

Naturally, college students who have learned nothing more
than how to behave like insolent brats attacked the high school debate champion
for cultural appropriation. By their dim lights, and by Areu’s, non-Chinese
Americans are not allowed to wear such things unless their consciousness has
been sufficiently raised. That means, unless they understand that the dress is
part of the systematic oppression of Chinese workers by predatory Western
capitalist imperialists. Please do not write to explain that such is not the case:
we are running on dogmatic belief, not on fact. And do not think that the dress represented a gesture of feminist rebellion against despotic authorities.

For the record, and in order for you not to become overly
confused, cultural appropriationism says that what’s mine is
mind and what’s yours is yours—culturally speaking. You can only borrow my culture
with permission and only then if you have babbled suitably politically correct
platitudes. Anyway, it’s all ancestor worship… meaning that you must cling to
the products of your culture and must reject that anyone else from a different
culture who exploits or uses them or even adopts them. Funnily enough, this makes cultural products into private property.

Daniel Greenfield gets at the essence of the issue on Front
Page Magazine. (via Maggie’s Farm) He checks the reports on this unimportant
cultural debate coming out of China itself, and finds the perfect title to
explain it all:

Chinese
Baffled by Marxist Dictatorship American Live Under.

Now that will make the chests of good
American leftists swell with pride.

Keziah
Daum, an 18-year-old from Utah in the United States, who has no Chinese roots,
was accused of “cultural appropriation” after posting photographs on Twitter
that featured her in a traditional Chinese qipao, or cheongsam.

The
dress symbolised a silent protest to promote gender
equality after the fall of the dynasties and the beginning of the
republican period in the early 1900s, and was worn during the 1919 reformist
May Fourth Movement.

The dress, in other words, made a political statement in
1919. Today’s it's a fashion statement... signifying female empowerment.

Since you are undoubtedly
curious, the SCMP addresses the more salient issue: what do today’s Chinese
think of Daum’s dress. Apparently, they have nothing better to do with their
time but to opine about American high school students’ prom attire.

“Very
elegant and beautiful! Really don’t understand the people who are against her,
they are wrong!” one person commented on an article by Wenxue City News. “I
suggest the Chinese government, state television or fashion company invite her
to China to display her cheongsam!”

“It is
not cultural theft,” another wrote. “It is cultural appreciation and cultural
respect.”

Weibo
users added that Daum looked beautiful and criticised those who have accused
her.

“Culture
has no borders,” one wrote. “There is no problem, as long as there is no malice
or deliberate maligning. Chinese cultural treasures are worth spreading all
over the world.”

As it happened, the dress was banned during the Age of Mao Zedong and during the Cultural
Revolution:

It fell
out of fashion between the 1950s and 1970s, as those who wore it were judged as
being bourgeois in a time of anti-tradition movements, but has since regained
popularity.

With
the recent promotion of traditional Chinese culture, the dress now embodies the
idea of being ethnically Chinese.

There you have it… a gesture of respect for Chinese culture has been rejected as bourgeois by America’s young cultural revolutionaries. One thing we see: they are completely incapable of cogent thought.