Vestas and General Electric (GE) dominate the market for industrial wind turbines in the U.S. Many older U.S. facilities use NEG Micon turbines, and Vestas has absorbed that manufacturer. Other older facilities use turbines from Zond, which was acquired by Enron (the inventor of "green tags"), whose wind business GE acquired in turn to take over the racket. Click the following company names for more information from their own web sites:
Vestas,
Gamesa,
GE,
Siemens,
Suzlon,
Senvion (Repower acquired by Suzlon in May 2007, renamed in January 2014),
and
Mitsubishi.
Nordex,
Enercon,
Americas Wind Energy,
and
Goldwind are also major manufacturers, but their turbines are less common in the U.S.

model

capacity

blade
*length*

†hub ht†

total ht

area swept
by blades

rpm range

max blade
‡tip speed‡

rated
wind
§speed§

GE 1.5s

1.5 MW

35.25 m
(116 ft)

64.7 m
(212 ft)

99.95 m
(328 ft)

3,904 m2
(0.96 acre)

11.1-22.2

183 mph

12 m/s
(27 mph)

GE 1.5sle

1.5 MW

38.5 m
(126 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

118.5 m
(389 ft)

4,657 m2
(1.15 acre)

?

?

14 m/s
(31 mph)

Vestas V82

1.65 MW

41 m
(135 ft)

70 m
(230 ft)

111 m
(364 ft)

5,281 m2
(1.30 acres)

?-14.4

138 mph

13 m/s
(29 mph)

Vestas V90

1.8 MW

45 m
(148 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

125 m
(410 ft)

6,362 m2
(1.57 acres)

8.8-14.9

157 mph

11 m/s
(25 mph)

105 m
(344 ft)

150 m
(492 ft)

Vestas V100

2.75 MW

50 m
(164 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

130 m
(427 ft)

7,854 m2
(1.94 acres)

7.2-15.3

179 mph

15 m/s
(34 mph)

100 m
(328 ft)

150 m
(492 ft)

Vestas V90

3.0 MW

45 m
(148 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

125 m
(410 ft)

6,362 m2
(1.57 acres)

9-19

200 mph

15 m/s
(34 mph)

Vestas V112

3.0 MW

56 m
(184 ft)

84 m
(276 ft)

136 m
(459 ft)

9,852 m2
(2.43 acres)

6.2-17.7

232 mph

12 m/s
(27 mph)

Gamesa G87

2.0 MW

43.5 m
(143 ft)

78 m
(256 ft)

121.5 m
(399 ft)

5,945 m2
(1.47 acres)

9/19

194 mph

c. 13.5 m/s
(30 mph)

Siemens

2.3 MW

46.5 m
(153 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

126.5 m
(415 ft)

6,793 m2
(1.68 acres)

6-16

169 mph

13-14 m/s
(29-31 mph)

Goldwind

2.5 MW

45-54.5 m
(148-179 ft)

70-90 m
(230-295 ft)

115-145.5 m
(377-477 ft)

6,362-9,331 m2
(1.57-2.31 acres)

7-16

175 mph

10.3-12 m/s
(23-27 mph)

Bonus (Siemens)

1.3 MW

31 m
(102 ft)

68 m
(223 ft)

99 m
(325 ft)

3,019 m2
(0.75 acres)

13/19

138 mph

14 m/s
(31 mph)

Bonus (Siemens)

2.0 MW

38 m
(125 ft)

60 m
(197 ft)

98 m
(322 ft)

4,536 m2
(1.12 acres)

11/17

151 mph

c. 15 m/s
(c. 34 mph)

Bonus (Siemens)

2.3 MW

41.2 m
(135 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

121.2 m
(398 ft)

5,333 m2
(1.32 acres)

11/17

164 mph

c. 15 m/s
(c. 34 mph)

Suzlon 950

0.95 MW

32 m
(105 ft)

65 m
(213 ft)

97 m
(318 ft)

3,217 m2
(0.79 acres)

13.9/20.8

156 mph

11 m/s
(25 mph)

Suzlon S64

1.25 MW

32 m
(105 ft)

73 m
(240 ft)

105 m
(344 ft)

3,217 m2
(0.79 acres)

13.9/20.8

156 mph

12 m/s
(27 mph)

Suzlon S88

2.1 MW

44 m
(144 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

124 m
(407 ft)

6,082 m2
(1.50 acres)

14 m/s
(31 mph)

Repower (Senvion) MM92

2.0 MW

46.25 m
(152 ft)

100 m
(328 ft)

146.25 m
(480 ft)

6,720 m2
(1.66 acres)

7.8-15.0

163 mph

11.2 m/s
(25 mph)

Enercon E-126

7.6 MW

63.5 m
(208 ft)

135 m
(443 ft)

198.5 m
(651 ft)

12,668 m2
(3.13 acres)

5-11.7

174 mph

Clipper Liberty

2.5 MW(4 × 650 KW)

44.5 m
(146 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

124.5 m
(409 ft)

6,221 m2
(1.54 acres)

9.7-15.5

163 mph

c. 11.5 m/s
(c. 26 mph)

46.5 m
(153 ft)

126.5 m
(415 ft)

6,793 m2
(1.68 acres)

169 mph

49.5 m
(162 ft)

78 m
(256 ft)

127.5 m
(418 ft)

7,698 m2
(1.90 acres)

180 mph

Mitsubishi MWT95

2.4 MW

47.5 m
(156 ft)

80 m
(262 ft)

127.5 m
(418 ft)

7,088 m2
(1.75 acres)

9.0-16.9

188 mph

12.5 m/s
(28 mph)

*This figure is actually half the rotor diameter. The blade itself may be about a meter shorter, because it is attached to a large hub.
†Hub (tower) heights may vary; the more commonly used sizes are presented.
‡Rotor diameter (m) × π × rpm ÷ 26.82
§The rated, or nominal, wind speed is the speed at which the turbine produces power at its full capacity. For example the GE 1.5s does not generate 1.5 MW of power until the wind is blowing steadily at 27 mph or more. As the wind falls below that, power production falls exponentially.