Er, I was suggesting you create a new 'TIE fighter' page, then use it to link to your already extant 'TIE/fc' page. I hope I wasn't unclear, and you just figure a whole page per variant was excessive (which it probably is). :# Anyway, SWTC has great info on TIE fighters, variants, and EU apperances, so I'd recommend you go have a look. --Stark 16:39, 8 November 2007 (EST)

I thought you meant a single page with a list of TIE fighter varients? I'm still rather new at this... Wild Karrde 16:45, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Well, it's a wiki, we can always clean up the format later: adding content is important, so keep up the good work. :) --Stark 16:58, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Images As Thumbnails Only

Seriously guys, those images look like shit. Use the thumbnail method to make them smaller and all the same size (200px). --Stark 17:40, 10 November 2007 (EST)

I assume that link you posted in the article was meant to go here :p. Anyway I'm looking at the swtc for the info now but thanks anyway.Wild Karrde 17:15, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Added a couple of general descriptions for some entries. I don't really know how much info is wanted for each entry so the ones there now could act as placeholders or something?Wild Karrde 18:00, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Um, that -was- a link to SWTC? Either way. :) And yeah, don't worry too much about polish or huge amounts of content yet. --Stark 18:03, 8 November 2007 (EST)

Im very sure that the TIE/In picture is wrong, the one above the fc model. I think a normal TIE fighter is pictured, and there are 2 TIE Interceptor entries? (Goddamn, I didnt realize there were so many TIE models :P) EDIT: I made a TIE/In article, should I just make all links to the TIE/In redirect to this page or leave the article as it is? -Darth Ruinus 1:04 PM 11-09-07 (Pacific Time)

The [TIE/ln] (lowercase L) is a standard TIE fighter model. It is different from the TIE Interceptor. There is no such thing as a TIE/In (uppercase i). -- Mad 15:11, 9 November 2007 (EST)