What do we know? A Tesla tower sparky lightning discharge is negative energy. There's a whole lot of electrical artificial lightning, at such a high frequency, and so many have touched the discharge by holding a conductive metal rod, and it just not hurt them.. just tingle a bit.

The collapse of an electromagnet is involved.

Notes:

Capacitor plates might have to hold energy first for a collapsing electromagnet to reverse the energy "spin."

I don't think a meter could even detect negative amps. You could only tell thru a secondary system like a guy touching high volts but at tiny tiny amps and being blown across the room (which has happened). If system A discharges all its energy into system B, and theres more energy produced, then the negative pressure of A squeezes more energy into system B. But a meter would just go to zero amps (and high volts) in system A and show higher volts and amps in system B.

Could it be? Let's examine a bolt of lightning. It is electrostatic. It rarely has any kind of electromagnetic signature. It's usually pure electric with no magnet, or with magnetic spin simultaneous in opposite polarity, phased to a zero until polarized (given magnetic spin).

So the collapse of the magnet produces lightning, but also it is energy where the magnet can be brought back out by polarization. There's those two aspects involved.

Not only can negative energy be in DC, but also in AC. In fact to generate it, there are DC and AC ways. Tesla used AC.

There's also the di-electrostatic aspect of radiant negative energy (for example on the surface of Earth; DC), and then there's the magneto-electrostatic aspect of negative energy used to create the artificial lightning out of a Tesla transformer, or Tesla tower (in AC).

I think it makes more sense to look at it as static inertia, rather than as negative and positive energies.

An induction coil with extreme capacitor (see the general blog page) will generate the artificial lightning out of a Tesla tower just from using a battery, or several batteries, delivering a very powerful static energy, which can be employed Bedini style to regenerate the battery. Otherwise, the only negative energy generator I know about produces more energy than goes into it, so a self-regenerating system will have the power available to keep the drive system going.

But as far as negative energy goes, didn't Tesla say that it can't be metered?

Here's something that pertains to the OTC-X1:

If negative amps can't be measured, and doesn't have the same effect as Lenz, then rapid pulsing of the outer electromagnets shouldn't have any bearing on the direction of the rotating utron disk (it will still spin in one direction), and the di-electric plates will charge with energy inductively. Just the rapid pulsing of an electromagnet over plates, even if they're not connected to each other, will energize the plates with energy.

The collapse of an electromagnet does not reverse it's spin even as it reverses polarity. It still spins in the same direction, just switches polarity. That is to say the current in the wire is still spinning. However, when polarity reverses, it is a sure sign of magnetic spin reversal. So, this remains to be put to the test. A good test is to see if the collapse will induce spin in the utron di-electrostatic plates in the opposite direction. .... However, because it's dealing with a collapse (pull instead of a push), the disk COULD continue to be spinning in the same direction. If it does, then as polarity reverses but the disk spin stays the same, then it is DEFINITELY negative energy.

The magnetic spin:

A magnet is said to exist due to the polarization of electron spin; yet too, the proton spins must also be polarized. Protons are not hard-connected. Each element involves the connection between the electrons to fuse together, according to conventional understanding. Lattice arrangements and flower fractal arrangements also exist. However, it is effortlessly enough to say that electrons and protons, in fact moreso involving proton spin alignment is involved in the formation of a magnet.

I had assumed early on, that it was the quark spin involved however; 3 quarks make up a proton. Adding protons forms new elements. But at higher frequency states, there can be additional quarks to make up a single element. For example, a single proton is the element of hydrogen. Two protons is the element of helium, and on down the list. But now as particle accelerators are finding pentaquarks (5-quark combinations), then new elements can be formed at a higher frequency state.

​Magnetic spin is the reason for Faraday's law. For example, here is an older picture I drew to illustrate. New information might make it outdated, but it is still relevant. I was examining string theory as evident in the very top right squigly image, but I have sense disregarded that.

It may seem silly, but ... mechanically it is correct. As the magnet moves across the coil, it sets the electricity into motion, then brings it back to rest. The magnetic field is in transverse, but the quantum spin of the magnet is in parallel.

I was saving this image for the book but .. ah well..

. . .

The point of all this however, is because I wanted to discuss the exotic energy connection of positive and negative energy, as to how it pertains to matter and antimatter.

​Can a negative energy field reverse the quantum spin of matter so that it becomes anti-spinning matter?

Some say "yes, absolutely." But I am still examining that.

Let's look at the OTC-X1 di-electric spinning utron disk. An electromagnet pushes the disk in one way, due to magnetic spin. Reversing the polarity of the magnetic field will reverse the disk's spin, as well as the current polarity. However, when the polarity reverses in magnetic collapse, if the disk still spins in the same direction, then it can be said that some other kind of spin is involved, some sort of anti-quantum spin.

That means the spin would have to be coming from the quantum level -- the quarks. For example, an electron is one quark, considered to be a "lepton." But reversing that spin shows up as a positron, with a positive charge, the anti-particle of an electron.

The direction of charge is the direction of the particle's static inertia.

The reason why I say the Tesla tower lightning is negative energy, is because the output of the spark itself is sent to an electromagnet coil that actualizes the energy in the Tesla transformers, whereas the spark is obtained due to the collapse of the electromagnetic field. So the field generated in the actualizing coils should be a negative energy field. In my actualizing coil, I only wound the coil three times around the resonating coil, thicker than the gauge of wire that made the long Tesla resonating coil, but the results were very potent indeed!!

The OTC-X1 electromagnets can be used to directly receive the spark collapse only, also, to test for spin reversal in the rotating utron disk.

It seems like something is missing from the OTC-X1 design. But, it is another style of Tesla generator, with induced motion. Similar to John Bedini's engines which can either use a rotor or be made with non-moving parts. It seems more reasonable that the electromagnets should receive only energy from the spark; and yet, the collapsing electromagnets are a requirement FOR the spark. The di-electric plates definitely is the medium for transfer of the static energies, and the spark collapse inside the Central Accumulator is the mechanism for the transmission of the negative energy to the electromagnets.

Eventually this will all be worked out. I surmise however that the pulsing of the electromagnets is essential for the harnessing of static inertia. In fact, that is a logical deduction.

​

Note upon measurement of negative amps:

The old analogue amp meters like out of old automobiles with the swing needle, which are analogue will measure negative amps, I have been told. Digital meters won't work for measuring negative amps. In fact the amp meter in my old Chevy only measures negative amp draw ... It won't even twitch positive to show how many amps I have.

On digital multimeters, first of all you can't really measure but a small amp current, and also Solid state components came out to replace vacuum tubes and Tesla technology. Those circuits are only wired for positive energy. Diodes and transistors only harness one way.

You would have to redesign the circuitry so the components work right.

Those newer digital meters were built around the existence of positive amps but pos OR neg volts.

No one has known negative amps actually exist as such. Everyone always assumed the meter wasn't hooked up in the right polarity, that there is no such thing as negative amps. Digital amp meters are wired with computers and solid state electronics with diodes that block the negative polarity.

However digital voltmeters work to measure the electrostatic energies that an analogue electromagnet can't pick up.

The circuit logic we use does not have the "or" gate for negative polarity of amps like in an old analogue amp meter.

​​​​Negative energy is a lot different than positive. Negative energy won't dissipate over long areas. Transmission through power lines, negative energy is not a big fluffy field, but a thin energy, and the universe sees that it is moving, and it adds energy to it as it goes along (you could say it draws a quantum vacuum charge that keeps pumping up the volts and amps), so at the end of a transmission line using negative energy, there will be a lot more energy! The old telegraph wires used a copper plate in the ground (earth battery) to power the system. The start of the signal was for example 6 volts, but at the end of the wire, it was very high voltage. The telegraph operator had to touch only the plastic/rubber key, and NOT the metal conductive parts. Thank you master D.J. for this bit of info.​Positive energy along the power lines dissipate over distance. . . . . Negative energy is so small that it builds up and up, not dissipating but intensifying.

​

. . .

​Oops!

Correction:

See the comments below regarding the collapsing magnetic field. The north pole on top of the utron disk and south pole below, is still north pole on top and south pole below, even in collapse.. however, there are some things to note.

Funny. Just dawned on me .. the magnetic field may collapse in the opposite polarity but the north south poles are still there while they're collapsing. In a generator, when the magnets approach coil, hit peak and they leave the vicinity, as the magnet leaves the vicinity the coil is collapsing ... but there's nothing too special about that kind of movement .. the coil just slacks off in power gradually and returns to rest. A rapid collapse is equivalent to imposing another magnet in the opposite polarity upon the first until zero. But that can be considered a negative magnet or antimagnet because the previous magnetic state, the poles moving in opposite direction induces the current to flow the other way.

Reply

LAU

1/12/2017 10:07:28 am

So the OTC-X1 electromagnets, north on top and south on bottom, will still be north on top and south on bottom even in collapse.

Reply

LAU

1/12/2017 10:16:25 am

The poles don't actually flip. The polarity does tho. Faraday's law still applies to a magnetic field in relative motion (movement relative to a conductor's position.

Reply

LAU

1/15/2017 02:13:08 pm

It's exciting to know that negative amps can be measured with positive volts!! It's funny too that negative energy is widely viewed as speculative instead of actually real and able to be measured as such. We sure as heck weren't taught about any of that in school. Wow. Now that we know what negative energy is, it's amazing that we can see where it's been used historically. I talked about negative energy used for old telegraph systems on the General blog page article "upon the shortest path" ...

Tesla said that type of energy is used specifically for space ships .. the ancient super-advanced technology buried in the Antarctic all uses negative energy systems. Modern scientists are clueless to how it all works.

Reply

LAU

1/16/2017 09:24:45 pm

Collapse at the speed of light occurs within the di-electric plates ..... harnessed as negative superconductive energy . . . . maybe not so much in the electromagnet coils at times, because they can resonate with both positive and negative energies. . . .

The energy is from the plates, from the vacuum energy of the matter of the plates, itself. Now all this stuff is finally starting to make sense.

Reply

LAU

2/2/2017 12:40:31 pm

The collapse of a coil could collapse in the opposite polarity however. Just as Bedini shows. The video demonstration of the free energy device on the Tesla Free energy page seems to show us a thing or two regarding that aspect. However if the collapse is in the same polarity, it would still work.

Reply

LAU

2/2/2017 12:46:48 pm

When magnetic poles collapse from an electromagnet, the polarity of the CURRENT reverses, and the collapse squeezes the electromagnetic energy, compressing it into a spark if the force is large enough.

Reply

LAU

2/2/2017 12:55:13 pm

I'd like to fill out the comment spaces a bit before adding anything new, which I would rather do in a book anyway. All this is very phenomenal, and absolutely changes what we know of physics just due to negative energy alone, which was thrust into my lap because others are too afraid to come out in public with it.

Reply

LAU

2/2/2017 01:01:08 pm

Talking about it, discussing the physics, that's one thing, but actually demonstrating the technology is another thing entirely. Coming out with demonstrations hasn't worked in the past. It's immediately sanitized, just like what they're doing in Antarctica currently with what has been discovered, since 2002. ...

Reply

LAU

2/5/2017 02:58:18 pm

This isn't negative energy but: New developments using resonance coils show that the coils have to resonate at the same frequency to amplify energy. A coil receives power from like a wall outlet (AC), runs to capacitors, runs to a secondary resonance coil around the first, and the power is run back through the primary. The output is stepped back down to house-current frequency, and there is an 800% increase in power output from the original input.

Reply

Leave a Reply.

LAU and .....

​______________________​Hyperdrive Mechanics​And Physics

​

​Primarily involving the construction of the OTC-X1 Electro-Gravity Craft right now. This page provides operational theory and design to further the development along.

See the post "... Engineering Breakthrough" (on this page) for further wiring possibilities, and acknowledgements.

. . .

The Outer Ring of the LAU-X3 Dragon-Eye integrates technology of Keshe, who has publicly disclosed a gravitational craft design of his own. ​