Yes,that seems quite funny and weird.Previously i had the baleen whales in grey color in the old image.They are gentle giants however they eat small animals and i was having confusions to call them as Predators.In one site,it was mentioned as the filter feeders are micro predators.Well, micro or macro,they do swallow tiny animals,so putting them as red is the correct thing and i did.

There are two styles of filter feeding-passive, making those animals (basking sharks, gray whales, etc) carnivores but not predators, and active (blue whale, whale shark, etc) making them active predators (but not raptorial active predators)

Please make a wide assortment of extinct primates from the Miocene on this huge diagram. If I could possibly tell you how many species of primates were converging during the Miocene, I would be some sort of genius. Some of them I want you to add are Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Paranthropus robustus, Ardipithicus, Australopithecus, Homo Habilis, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, homo neanderthalensis, homo heidelbergensis, homo rhodeisensis, and Darwinius on this diagram, that's all I know. But I'll just suggest that you should put a lot of extinct primates on here. And please add the extinct Agriotherium, Toxodon, Glyptodon, and Titanichthys to this chart, oh, and perhaps you should add more Permian synapsids, temnospondyls, therapsids, Rodents, sirenians, monotremes, most surely more extinct three-toed horses, entelodonts, nimravids, more extinct Giraffes like Sivatherium and Bramatherium, more extinct cetaceans like Cetotherium and prehistoric Seals like Acrophoca and Miocene and Eocene proboscideans such as Eritreum melakeghebrekristosi. And maybe some birds such as sinornithosaurus, saurornithoides, and Microraptor. Mauisaurus and galloping crocodilians. And some extinct lob-finned fishes such as Phizodus, and it needs more extinct bovids, and it could use some tetrapods.

Nice update, but why Alamosaurus nad Puertasaurus are bigger than Argentinosaurus? I read that Alamosaurus was the same size, and Puertasaurus was estimated to be bigger at first, but more recent estimates say it was only 100 ft long. And an even more important thing to me, why Mapusaurus is 43 ft long like Giganotosaurus? The largest estimate I know is 40 ft.

All those 3 are having a similar body size except Alamosaurus having a slight long neck and Puertasaurus neck is slightly longer than that as well as it's tail. The weight of Argentinosaurus was reduced before many days which you should be knowing. In that case,it's size should be smaller than seen in the chart.But still i am using that same size which is upto 100 tonnes. I don't believe in the accuracies of animals known from partial remains. Any one of those 3 animals could be bigger than the rest or all of them could be similar in size,who knows.There is not much evidence.

You know, one of these days you've gotta make a Gigantopithecus Sameer, that would be awesome! I can just imagine you making an amazing Deviant art drawing of Gigantopithecus standing at least 10ft tall and weighing 1,200 pounds! SO EXITING!!!!!