Did either of you go into his post history to see if there's anything to justify your concerns? To see if there's a questionable pattern? I suggest you do before one small thing like this here makes you "call troll". Over doing it, and too easily calling it, is just as bad as not thinking about it at all.

Sorry, but not everyone keeps up with the news and he may not have heard anything about her except what he knows about her neocon and interracial dating past. I just looked at some posts and don't see any obvious reason for concern.

You're right, thats why I refrained from saying anything at all earlier. It gets old seeing the same remarks in every Ann thread and having to make the same distinctions between the past and what someone is doing now. It's obvious there is a change as mantra talking points are making their impact.

And the infighting continues.
Okay. So Ann is a filthy mudshark that should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.
Happy now?
And to those of you that think that,what are your "purity musts" for anyone that may actually be pro white and have some access to the MSM?
Apparently any person that has deviated from the purist White Nationalism AT ANY TIME IN THEIR LIVES should be spit on as a traitor by all REAL WN's !

She dated a non White in the past. There. You all have the dirt on her. And so what does that mean to us now? Since she is helping our people tremendously. Since she bravely advocates for whites in a way few public people have the guts to do and she is not seeing a non White, well, I say her past means she made mistakes and is fully repented and more than reconciliated for them.

We must allow our people reconciliation or do we make them wear a Scarlet Letter for race mixing for the rest of their lives?

She is such an admirable White women I beg all of you to stop sullying what she does now by holding her past against her.

She dated a non White in the past. There. You all have the dirt on her. And so what does that mean to us now? Since she is helping our people tremendously. Since she bravely advocates for whites in a way few public people have the guts to do and she is not seeing a non White, well, I say her past means she made mistakes and is fully repented and more than reconciliated for them.

We must allow our people reconciliation or do we make them wear a Scarlet Letter for race mixing for the rest of their lives?

She is such an admirable White women I beg all of you to stop sullying what she does now by holding her past against her.

Nope. You are going to be ignored. True WN's are not allowed to make mistakes.
It's Scarlet Letter (google it) time,every time.

You're right, thats why I refrained from saying anything at all earlier. It gets old seeing the same remarks in every Ann thread and having to make the same distinctions between the past and what someone is doing now.

So, the moral of the story is for EVERYONE, including that other poster, to be more discerning and informed before making 'off the cuff' remarks that don't contribute anything new or of value. Or that may be out of line (calling someone a troll who isn't).

See, as it is, we're now "flooding" this thread with unnecessary yapping...

I think she was being careful to be polite there too, wanting to clear up ignorant and/or intentional rumors spread about her but not wanting to hurt Walker's feelings too much. This is a woman who's pragmatic enough to want the 19th Amendment repealed, even if it would deny her the right to vote. Not too hard to imagine her having platonic male friends.

As the author of several #1 best-selling books, she is one of the most recognized (and hated) conservative pundits in America and elsewhere. She has been more outspoken in defense of White America than probably any other person in a similar position. That has value of the kind that it far outweighs gossip and rumors about her past private life.

We can't practically make it an offense to criticize Coulter and I'm sure Don Black wouldn't want that. It would be helpful though if any member report substantive threads being derailed and some members' time wasted to the extent it has been in just two pages of this one. Sincere questioning or commenting on Coulter's private life is one thing (however usually off-topic and typically gratuitous and meant to be insulting), but to come into the middle of a discussion such as this and post, "Didn't she used to have sex with negroes?" is not appreciated and has been done to death here already.

Her relationships with the jew and dot indian are not speculative. They are fact. Her loyalty to israel and mainstream judeo-christian ways of thinking is not speculative, it's fact.

All those are reasons for caution. Mainly though is her stated loyalties toward israel, judeo-christianity, and possibly jews as a people. The race-mixing (considering she doesn't have children) I agree, is of much less concern.

Well, then you and I are going to have problems. Everytime you make a statement such as "anti-Coulter" or "anti-Trump" equals "Anti-White" I will call bullsh*t. So it will be on you if it "excessively floods" the thread. There is no need for you to make those kinds of irrational and unreasonable statements.

Her recent commentary and words should stand by themselves. Along with her most recent book. Should they not?

I'm not going to just let that nonsense be put put forth as common thinking on Sf. It's not accurate and it's unworthy of being repeated over and over as if there's no questioning or presenting of opposing information on people like her and Trump. That's commie-like mentality.

Why would you work against Ann Coulter? What the hell is wrong with you?

The crap you and the trolls keep bringing up is IRRELEVANT.

__________________

__________________

Divergence from Whiteness is divergence from greatness.

To make America great again, Donald, you have to make America White again.

And although it may be lost on some, note the crafty choice of words in stating the mostly Black violent crime problem in the US is a "demographic" problem. She got in the explicit fact about how low the murder rate would be in the US if it were an all White nation, or how much less crime there would be without Blacks: "If you compare White populations, we have the same murder rate as Belgium."

That's an important factoid to drop on people and just leave it to them to process, either at the moment or over time. It's surprising how many of our people are aware enough of there being lots of violent crime being committed by Blacks in the US but have only a vague notion or no clue at all just exactly how out of proportion it really is.