Physics Journey To Life

Pages

Sunday, March 3, 2013

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”

This is the second part of my previous blog, please read it for context if you haven’t already.

Now, let me brake down Bashar's statement into smaller pieces, so that we can see what exactly he is implying and supporting - "Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics"

"Everything is energy and that's all there is to it."

Yes, everything can bee seen as energy, but that is a direct decision, a lens we place on reality and see it in a specific way - this statement is not more true than saying "everything is physical substance and that's all there is to it" because we know that energy and physicality are interchangeable, or more accurately, within the equations, they can be defined in relation to each other - this goes both ways.

"Match the frequency"

Here Bashar is implying that we have the power to control the frequency that we exist as - this is a very powerful implication, this means that we do not have to be subjective to any energy, this means that we can stop participating with frequency all together and not be dependent to the positive energies, nor fear the negative ones - once we stop our own frequency, as stopping our participation with the mind's energy, any energy / frequency around us will not influence us, because it will not resonate with us, because energy can only resonate with energy, and if we have the ability as Bashar implies to stop our frequency, then we will no longer be enslaved to it, and can take self responsibility and apply ourselves with the practicality and common sense solution as what is best for all life, living not within self interest but within the principle of equality and oneness.

But is this really what Bashar meant to say? I doubt it, yet this can be derived from his words, from the truth of his words, not from his deceptive intention.

So what does he mean? He is implying that we can control the frequency we exist as and match it to our self interest desires, so that we can have a good energetic feeling as the drug that he is pushing, he is acting exactly as a drug pusher, convincing us and justifying why his drug, our addiction, is fine because "it'll make you feel so good"...

Thus, Bashar is in fact supporting our enslavement to energy, as when one exists within energy they are trapped within it, one cannot be in directive principle of oneself when existing within and as energy, thus one cannot be trusted, as at any time another frequency can influence oneself, and effect ones behavior and actions, or when ones positive energy is depleted one will turn to deception and manipulation in order to get that kick of positive energy, thus, creating relationships and communications based on exploitation, as we use each other to get our energy kick, rather than communicate unconditionally without any hidden agendas.

"the reality you want"

Here Bashar is bluntly asking us to go after our self interest - such a statement is irresponsible - what is the reality that we want? Our wants and desires are not aligned with one another, thus if we follow our wants and desires we are sure to create conflict as there would be conflict of interest - consumerism is based on wants and desires, war and arguments are based on defending our wants and desires, slavery is a result of our greedy nature of going after our wants and desires - how can a spiritual guru express such irresponsible words, and even worse, how can his followers not notice this, but instead they blindly follow

Why? Because wouldn't we love it if the world was actually like this, if we could just close our eyes and focus on what we want, and get it without it having any repercussions, consequences and outflows, isn't that what we wish someone could tell us in such a way so we can believe it?

Now, through following Bashar’s message, we can justify our greed, our selfishness, our self interest, and believe that looking out only for ourselves in complete disregard to the rest of existence, which we just happen to be a part of, is fine, and is justified by physics - No, physics doesn't justify any of it, if you look at reality, nothing in nature ever only looks after itself, reality realizes itself as one - look at our physical body, all cells are interconnected and are working together, taking only the nutrients they need and sharing the rest, realizing they are all equal parts of the one system of the human body - there is even an intelligence within them that when they realize they are not serving the body, they will self destruct - and do you know what we call cells that only care for themselves, and only care for their wants, desires and greed - we call them cancer cells - this is what Bashar is promoting, he is supporting humanity to remain a cancer in the body of existence, and a cancer within and towards humanity itself.

He is also supporting capitalism as the manifestation of desire and greed in the name of self interest and profit, where fulfilling ones wants and desires is the basic of the capitalistic / consumerist system.

He is promoting ignorance and disregard to how the physical actually works, where within the current system, which is a duplicate of how we exist within our minds, which is what Bashar is supporting, in which there is such an extent of inequality, a system where for me to get what I want, someone else must suffer, for me to live in bliss someone else must live in hell - this is the result of existing in the energetic polarity of the mind - so why is he promoting it? Does he simply not understand better, or is he simply making a profit out of it, and thus, has his own self interest to care for - and we are all blind because it justifies our own self interest, so we are not really blind as much as we deliberately turn a blind eye - we can now blissfully care only for ourselves, while others suffer the result of our actions, as the consequences of the law of balance, and we can do so within a good positive feeling, believing ourselves to be spiritual… what a con...

" It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics"

This is simply a marketing tool - telling people that your statement is true, that it is scientific, and repeating it in different forms, so that the reader will integrate the information, just as they use mind control in advertisement - once you see something a few times, it becomes a part of you, as well as the energetic charge you had while seeing / reading the advertisement - so Bashar is writing a hopeful statement, giving us the illusion that we can with just adjusting our thoughts, create and manifest all our desires - this statements makes us feel good, thus we are participating, tapping into, aligning ourselves with that specific positive energy frequency of hope - we are now generators of this frequency, completely oblivious to the outflow of our participation with such energy - as we have now seen that any mind energy is based in self interest, and is within the polarity of positive / negative and thus as we create within ourselves the positive energy of hope, we are simultaneously contributing to all the abuse, suffering and hopelessness in our world.

Now, looking at Bashar's statement, and combining all the above points, it is clear that this statement is a fallacy. We must be willing to see reality for what it is, not what we wish it would be, only through seeing reality and ourselves within self honesty as what we really are, can we correct ourselves, change ourselves, mend our ways, and perhaps, with a lot of hard work and dedication, change how we exist, change how we communicate with ourselves and with each other, change what we accept and allow within ourselves and the world system - though, in order to know what needs to be changed, we must face ourselves, even though what we will see is pure evil, just like when facing the reality of the world what we will see is a tremendous amount of suffering and abuse, and the deeper we look in self honesty, the more we will see our responsibility, our participation and our creation of the world as it exists today.

Realize that the solution is not in energy, energy will always exist through friction / conflict / polarity / separation - the solution must be constructed by and from what we want the end result to look like, and not from broken pieces of what we want to change, which is the cause / source / reason of the problem - thus, the solution must stand in equality, in equilibrium, in stability - energy cannot be a part of it - we must get off the swing, let go of our attachment to energy, and find who we are beyond it, find out what it means to live, to express, to experience, to breathe without an energetic baggage pulling us down.

For those of you who are new to the desteni material, there is a vast amount of information and practical tools for application, as this information is only valid once lived as yourself - so please give yourself the gift of unconditionally investigating the material, and see for yourself who you really are.

For very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”

In my last blog I gave some background about potential and kinetic energy, in order to face this next point - the following quote represents a way of life many people believe in and live by.

"Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics" - Bashar

This point of view is accepted by many, and they have convinced themselves that physics, as the law of nature, is aligned with their belief, using physics legitimize and justify their actions and beliefs, but I'm about to show that this isn't the case - I will show how the law of physics "disapproves" with their approach to life, and even though these believers think themselves to be a force of positivity in the world / reality, physics, if looked at it critically, shows quite the contrary, that their methods, if anything, are harmful and destructive.

I will follow a set of assumptions, based on common sense - if you agree with the assumptions I make, and follow the same line of common sense, you will get to the same conclusion as I have stated above:

1 - Existence is the ultimate "closed system" - It includes everything within it and nothing is excluded, thus, there can be nothing beyond that which exists in existence, thus, the law of conservation of energy must apply in regards to the totality of energy within existence.

2 - The natural law of balance is an existential law, this means that anything in existence obeys the law of balance, there is an equilibrium that is maintained when taking all parts of existence into consideration - what seems to be out of balance in a local scale, in an existential perspective, balances out as everything within existence is interconnected, and thus influences and is influenced by everything in existence. This is nicely explain by what is known as "the butterfly effect" where it is said that a flap of a butterflies wings in one side of the world will create a ripple effect that can cause severe weather conditions on the other side of the world - all in existence is interconnected, nothing can happen without having some form of outflow that will coincide with the law of balance when looking at the greater scale of things.

3 - Everything in existence can be defined in terms of its energy - any physical system / interaction / situation / particle / movement / change - all can be "translated" to energetic terms - having said that we must consider that we, as humanity, as our awareness, are part of existence, we are not excluded from everything that exists, as we too exist within existence, thus, our experience and perception of reality can be translated in terms of energy - where, energy is not only defined by the type of energy, as the form it takes, or the substance it "communicates" with, it is defined by it's frequency, and thus, anything that is expressed in terms of energy can be individualized from the perspective of it's frequency, as the frequency expression of a system / interaction / situation / particle can be seen as its' identity - a clear example is colors - within the spectrum of electromagnetic energy frequencies, there is a small range of "light" that is visible to the human eye, the eye detects the differences of frequency and interprets it as the different colors of the rainbow, the eyes are limited and thus, what we see is but a rough division of frequencies, though it is clear that each frequency stands as an individualized entity - taking this back to Bashar's quote, "Match the frequency of the reality you want" - this implies that reality, and our perception of reality, our view of it, can be defined in terms of energy frequency, and that every experience holds within it a unique frequency, where, different experiences can be grouped and categories, just as with physical energies.

4 - Emotions or feelings are energetic experiences - emotions are defined as bad / negative energetic experience, feelings are defined as good / positive energetic experiences - why do I say it is energy? - we can experience it within ourselves as a movement, as a vibration, as heat, as pain, we experience it within having excessive thoughts and back chats, we experience it as something going on within us, and we are moved by it, we act on it - thus, it is a force experienced within ourselves that creates movement, and thus is considered to be working on us, and thus, just as we the physical energy we have discussed in previous blogs, "mind energy" functions in the same way and obeys the same rules - it really is just as in the simplistically of physical, when a force creates movement or a change we know work is being done, when there is "something going on", any movement or any change we know there is energy at play - thus, when there is "something going on" within ourselves, as we experience it for ourselves, there must be energies at play - we call this inner movement "mind energy" - the energy of the mind, the energy that generates and is generated by emotions, feelings and thoughts as back chat, images, beliefs, fears, memories. Where as all physical energies can be defined in terms of potential and kinetic energies - mind energy can be roughly divided to a dichotomy of positive and negative energies, where in most cases, the experience is actually comprised by layers and layers of sub experiences and thus, both positive and negative energy can be found. And, just as physical energy, which is derived from the physical as using substance to extract energy from it, depleting it from its' life essence as it transforms into another form / part / interaction within the physical, a similar construct happens with mind energy, as the mind resources energy from the human physical body, using the physical to generate energy as the physical body is slowly depleted.

Now, Within conservation of energy, in a closed system, we can assume that the amount of energy in existence is constant, this including of course all substance and basically every thing in existence - the total of everything in existence is constant - we use "conservation of energy" because, as I've stated in my previous blog, science has given energy the highest regard and has "translated" all of reality into energy equations - this of course is aligned with the human mental state, as the mind, as the human experiences reality through the interpretation of the mind, and thus sees everything in terms of energy, as in alignment to ones experience of the world - this goes back to the discussion of the paradigm, where we must always keep in mind the limitation of science being a representation of the human consciousness, and thus, can only see as far as humanity is willing to see.

Within the assumption that all that exists is constant at a large scale of things, from the perspective of the sum of all the types of energy that exist in each moment, and within realizing that all energies include the active energies as kinetic energy, as well as the potential energies as mass energy, as the energy "stored" within each particle of physical substance - we must accept the fact that any change / transformation within any type of energy will create a simultaneous change in another form energy, as to maintain the constant balance of the sum of all energies at play. This will thus be true when discussing mind energy as well, where as any altering / changing / resonating positive energy will create a change / disturbance in negative energy - and within the law of balance, the more positive energy we put in the system, the more negative energy the system will create to balance itself out.

Here it is starting to be clear that our goal would then be to stop existing in the polarity of positive and negative, as we clearly see that within the energetic polarity we cannot help but desire all that we perceive to be "good" and "divine", within believing our energetic experience of it being good, but we have never considered the direct consequence we must endure as all that is experienced as "bad" and "evil" - the solution to this predicament exist outside of the realm of energy - the solution cannot be found in energetic terms because energy within its' nature is a polarity - and thus, to reach equilibrium, where the swing rests at the center point and has no potential and no kinetic energy, we must be willing to give up the experience of swinging on the swing all together - this may sound drastic, but in order to live our lives in true peace and harmony, in equilibrium, in balance, and not in a constant roller coaster between high and low, good and bad, not to endure pain, abuse and suffering for momentary happiness, we must be willing to give up the experience of the swing, we must realize that in order to live we must get off the excitement of the swing and participate in life, as expressing ourselves, communicating with others, building intimate relationships and so on - all cannot occur when we are preoccupied with the energetic experience of being on a swing, we must allow ourselves to come off the swing, stop the energetic addiction, and start living here. One with the physical instead of consuming the physical for our pure self interest experience of momentary joy, to be followed by suffering inflicted on us or others.

We must realize and be aware of a few things here - Kinetic energy can only be positive due to it's mathematical expression having the velocity squared, and thus always positive, but, on the other hand, potential energy can be either positive or negative, it all depends on specific system's definitions, usually made out to be as convenient as possible for calculations, whereas this liberty of reference frames does not effect the physics of the situation - now, since we are working with a total energy that remains constant, we can define that constant as either a zero or a non zero number and it wouldn't effect the integrity of our investigation. So, just to be clear, in the case of the total energy being defined as zero, we must realize that the more kinetic energy we accumulate as a positive energy, the more negative potential energy we will have, this is direct consequence of the law of conservation of energy. In the other case, where we have defined the total energy as a non zero constant, we can define it in such a way that when the kinetic energy is at it's maximum, the potential energy will be zero, and then what we will have is altering fluctuations, as the kinetic energy increases the potential decreases - in other words, as the swing comes speeding down it's velocity increases, and thus it's kinetic energy grows, until it passes the center point where the velocity is maximal, at that point the swing is at it's lowest where the potential energy is defined as zero, then as the swing heads back up the velocity decreases until it comes to a stop and turns back down, where as the swing goes up, its' potential energy increases with it.

The energy of the swing will run out unless we have a constant force that puts more and more energy into the swing’s system, other wise it will gradually decrees in height and velocity, due to energy leaving the system in form of heat energy. in such a case there is a specific frequency in which the force must be aligned with in order to resonate with the natural frequency of the swing (this mostly depends on the length of the swing), if the force is emitted at the precise moment, the swing will accumulate energy, this is due to a phenomenon called "resonance" - where the force's frequency is in resonance, in alignment, with the frequency of the swing. What happens is, (and I'm sure you've all experienced this as kids on a swing, or pushing a kid on a swing), when the swing is pushed at the right moment, the push contributes to the velocity of the swing, thus giving it more kinetic energy, which must transform to more potential energy, and so, with every push the swing accumulates more energy, whereas, only due to physical limitations of the swing as friction and construct, will it not go higher and higher into infinity.

Why do I mention this point? First of all to explain the point of resonance, this doesn't happen only with swings, this accrues with everything that has a frequency - when two frequencies are aligned they resonate, and as they resonate the amplify, where the two frequencies must obviously be in the same form of substance for them to "communicate" with each other - what I mean by this is that you will not be able to swing your kid any higher by "pushing" the swing with electromagnetic frequency, you must make physical contact and push the swing using some form of mechanical force, same with any other form of wave / energy / frequency - a sound wave will not "communicate" with an electromagnetic waves, because they travel in different fields, they are different forms of substance.

Anyway, any two frequencies, of the same substance, could resonant with one another, whereas within the phenomena of resonance there is an amplification of the frequency - if both are "free" as in not restricted to their specific frequency by construct, you may see situations that both "meet in the middle" and unite at a third frequency, but if only one is restricted and the other is free to adjust it's frequency, as in the case of the swing, then one can align itself with the restricted frequency in order to resonate with it and amplify it - such with the person pushing the swing doing so deliberately, in awareness, at a specific frequency to enhance the energy of the swinging mass - in this case the free frequency is deliberately aligning itself with the restricted frequency, another case would be that the deliberate force is within a specific frequency, and using its' strength and stability to "bring" other frequencies to a desired frequency.

to be continued…..

Educate yourself further:

For very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"

Saturday, February 23, 2013

I saw this sentence posted on my Facebook page the other day: "Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics" - Bashar

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”

This point of view is accepted by many, and they have convinced themselves that physics is aligned with their belief, but this isn't the case. I wanted to write about this today, and show how the law of physics "disapproves" with their approach to life, and even though they believe they are a force of positivity in the world / reality, physics shows that their methods, if anything, are harmful and distractive.

But in order to express my point, I must first explain some more basic concepts in regards to energy, so in this blog I will give an explanation to what is Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy - I've written in my previous blogs that there are many forms of energy, but they have all been divided and categorized as Potential and Kinetic Energies.

As I've mentioned previously, energy has never been seen directly. All formulas for energy thus, express a physical relationship and interaction between physical objects / participles, or as an internal relationship within an object / particle, though you must consider that for any interaction to take place it must happen within some form of separation, as any relationship / interaction happens when at least two objects / particles / entities meet, so basically it's a matter of scale, as the energy is within an object though it is "held" / "created" due to the interactions / movement of the perceived separation of the internal particles. From this perspective it's important to realize that any interpretation of energy is within the paradigm of separation, due to the fact that we, humans, exist in a constant experience, self belief and interpretation of separation in all realms of our reality.

It would have been interesting to see, how physics would have evolved if we were to look at reality from a different starting point, would we have been able to see energy as we know it today, or is how we see it a mere reflection of ourselves as beings that exist in separation from ourselves, each other, nature, the planet, the physical and existence as a whole, trapped in our mind's interpretation of reality and impose this interpretation on nature / the physical, as the only existing truth. On the other hand, assuming our interpretation is accurate, and nature is as separate as we are, does this determine how things must be, does this then mean we must follow natures lead, or can we be the ones living the example and freeing ourselves from our perceived separation, to then having nature and the physical as a whole, follow? Could we not realize ourselves as oneness and equality, and despite how nature is separated, to be the pillar of change, to stand in self honesty and self responsibility, and rebirth ourselves as life? Are we going to hold nature responsible for who / what we have accepted and allowed ourselves to be?

Energy as a concept was initially understood and defined as "life force" as it was seen to be the fuel that allows life to run and operate on, this opens up another point of question as "what is life?" but this is for a later blog.

I ask myself though, whether energy is what is fueling life, thus, making energy a vital and indispensible part of the equation of life, or is it the contrary, where it is life, as the physical, that is fueling energy, where, life, as the physical, is consumed and destroyed as it is violently and mercilessly transformed into energy, and that it is the process of energy creation / transformation that is sucking the life out of existence rather than allowing it to run. Could it be that we have it all in reverse? Is energy the source of life or is energy the result? Can energy exist without the physical? Can life exist without energy? - I will further explore such questioned, but consider that our definitions of life, energy, physicality - all must be evaluated, because as of today they have been defined through a specific lens of separation, and thus have not allowed all rays within the spectrum of reality to shine through the lens, some rays have been hidden through the choice of our lens - can we really trust what we think we know?

So, as I was saying, energy is a concept based on separation, polarity, because for energy to exist one must have some form of interaction which can only be when there are more than 1 that can interact with each other - within this starting point of energy - energy has been divided further into two categories of energies that do not over lap, they exist as a dichotomy - energy, as a complete / whole / full quantity, has been divided to potential energy and kinetic energy, where these two energies are contradicting in nature, they can co-exist but are very strictly defined and separated - as one is the potential / possibility, and the other the actuality / manifestation. Almost like the one is the idea and the other is the application, once you apply the idea it no longer exists as an idea, and as long as it is an idea there can be no physical application.

Potential and kinetic energy are considered to complete each other, the sum of all together is the totality of energy, they represent each other's opposites, they contradict each other - potential energy stands for the ability to do work, the potential, the possibility, whereas kinetic energy referrers to the actuality of doing the work, the movement, the action - and thus, they exist as dichotomy polarities, where, as defined by Aristotle as the philosophical concept of Potentiality and Actuality, like a yen and yang in a way, together both energies complete a whole, yet they are non-overlapping parts of the whole - from a conservation of energy perspective we will see that there is a transformational flow of energy from potential to the kinetic energy, and in some cases back again, depending on the construct of the system -

Conservation of energy and the transformation from potential to kinetic energy and back again, is clearly visible within harmonic oscillation movement, as an ideal system of perpetual motion such as a swing or a pendulum or a spring - this will be explain soon enough, let's begin.

Potential energy is associated with a set of forces that act on a body in a way that depends only on the body's position in space / a force field, it is the energy of an object, or a system, due to the position of the object or the arrangement of the particles of the system within a specific field of force. It refers to an object in a field where the interaction between the object and the field provides the object with the potential to do work, thus potential energy.

As I've said, all types of energy are divided to potential energy and kinetic energy, needless to say there are a few types of energy that function as potential energy, amongst them you will find, gravitational potential energy, electric potential energy, chemical potential energy, elastic potential energy - all have the same structure and principle as the amount of energy is in relation to the object's location within the field / space / substance.

There are various types of potential energy, each associated with a particular type of force. Here is the general expression of the principle for potential energy:

(the change in energy) = (force) X (distance force act through)

Notice the potential energy is not an independent quantity, it refers to a comparison between two chosen points within the field - the amount of potential energy an object, is not a concrete amount, it means nothing really, because it is relative to it's surrounding, to other objects within the environment, thus, what is concrete is the relationship between two objects, or two points of reference, and thus the relation between two energies - this is the reason the general equation above is defined as the change in energy and the distance the force act through -because that would be a definitive amount and would remain the same in all frames of reference.

Kinetic energy is associated with an object's movement, it's velocity, in relation to the observational reference point. The Kinetic energy of an object is the energy which it possesses due to its motion. It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes.

Kinetic energy is frame dependent, which means that if you watch a train go by it will have an energy dependent on it's velocity according to your view of reference, though for an observer sitting in the train, the train seems to be at rest, and there will thus be no kinetic energy from that frame of reference.

The Kinetic energy of a body or a system is a sum of all kinetic energies of all points / masses of the body, as well as kinetic energy of the center of mass, it is thus most convenient to calculate the kinetic energy from the reference frame of the center of mass, though it is not obligatory - we will find that in the center of mass reference frame the total kinetic energy will be the lowest, because the addition of the center of mass kinetic energy in it's own reference frame will always be zero.

As with potential energy, here too there are other forms of energy, that have somewhat different expressions but are actually kinetic energy, such as rotational energy, where a body spins around it's own axes, like planet earth, there is the movement of the circular / linear motion around the sun, and there is the spin around our own center. Another kinetic energy will be heat, where this is a major point of "energy loss" - how is heat kinetic energy? When energy is transformed into a mass in a collision, or through friction, the particles are energized and as they have more energy they move around faster and thus have more kinetic energy, the temperature of a gas for instance is proportional to the average kinetic energy of its molecules.

At any given moment the total energy will be the sum of the momentary potential and kinetic energies.

This covers the basics of potential and kinetic energy

Now to see the transformation of energy from potential to kinetic and back again - take a pendulum, a swing is a type of pendulum, if we pull the mass aside and release it, it will move back and forth. In it's motion, it loses height in going from either side end to the center - the potential energy that is there due to the height of the mass, disappears when the mass is back down at the center point of the pendulum, at that point the mass's velocity is greatest, the gravitational energy had transformed into kinetic energy, where merely by the virtue of it's motion, will the mass be able to climb back up again. When it reaches the top it pauses for a moment to change direction right before it falls back down again, at that point the velocity is zero, and all the energy is potential energy.

We will find the exact same construct when playing with a spring, we contract it, and at that point it has only potential energy, then when we let it go, it will accelerate until it reaches the center where it's velocity will be greatest and at that point the potential energy will be zero, because at the point of equilibrium the spring is not pulling nor pushing, though again, by mere virtue of the mass's velocity will the spring continue to expand until it will reach it's maximum point - when the velocity will be zero, and the potential energy will me maxed out - both gravitational and elastic potential energy are dependent on the distance the force works on the body - in an ideal system with no energy loss as friction or heat, both the spring and the pendulum will go on forever, from potential to kinetic and back again - we know though, that in reality there will always be some form of energy loss, so eventually the system will dissipate and the energy will run out through heat / friction.

Another point we must not forget, is that even though we are discussing energies, both energies are dependent on and defined in relation to the body's mass - the mass is, in a way, the chamber of energy - as I write the word chamber I am reacting to the choice of words, so to be clear - "chamber" does not by any means define a lesser entity as it might be seen, no, the chamber / holder / body is the substance that without it energy would not be able to do anything, even the work we are referring to is actually done by the physical, energy cannot float around substanceless, in any way you look at energy you will find a mass, as small as it may be, substance is always there, it is that which is containing this energy.

So we see the total energy (E) is a sum of the potential energy (P) and the kinetic energy (K), which are all the forms of energy within the system. Both expression individually can be dependent on time, as we know in each moment the mass on the pendulum / swing / spring is moving back and forth around the point of equilibrium, so the mass, changes it's position in relation to time, and the velocity changes in relation to time, yet their sum is constant, thus not dependent on time, thus, the sum of the two energies, in every moment, is equivalent to the initial energy we had started with, within the law of conservation of energy, and assuming no energy loss that cannot be determined.

For very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"