Some Senate Republicans said the upcoming aid package for Ukraine could draw an amendment adding sanctions on Iran, although others cautioned against that approach.

“It could be,” Republican Conference Chairman John Thune, R-S.D., said when asked if such an amendment would come up. “I am sure there will be some interest.”

Thune said he had not heard of a member planning to offer an Iran sanctions amendment, but other Republicans said it could be a tempting legislative vehicle.

“Potentially,” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said when asked about the possibility.

“The problem with Iran sanctions around here is they won’t even give us a vote on it,” Rubio continued. “We are always looking for opportunities to have a vote on that issue. That is another pressing national security concern, perhaps even more pressing than the situation in Ukraine.”

Thune and other Republicans also said to expect an amendment to expedite natural gas exports to Ukraine.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is currently working on an aid package for Ukraine following the incursion by the Russian military into Crimea after a popular uprising ousted Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The Republican-led House passed its Ukraine aid package Thursday and the Democratic-run Senate is expected to act on its proposal in the near future. The House measure would allow Ukraine to be eligible for up to $1 billion in loan guarantees under a State Department program, although it doesn’t include separate International Monetary Fund lending authority sought Thursday by President Barack Obama.

“Today, House Republicans acted swiftly to provide the Administration with authority to issue loan guarantees to Ukraine,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said in a release. “Russia’s invasion of a sovereign nation is a violation of international law and its legal commitments. Our actions today demonstrate that the United States stands in support of the Ukrainian people and their government. Time is of the essence, and I urge my colleagues in the Senate to pass this bill swiftly so we can provide the President with the tools he needs to help stabilize Ukraine.”

Republicans have been pushing for vote on a pending Iran sanctions bill sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

But Senate Majority Harry Reid, D-Nev., has been unwilling to take up the Iran measure because the White House doesn’t want any congressional action while negotiations with Iran to keep them from developing a nuclear weapon are ongoing.

Republicans sought to force a vote last month on the Iran sanctions bill in connection with a Democratic veterans bill, sponsored by Vermont independent Sen. Bernard Sanders, which would have improved health care and dental care, expand educational opportunities and helped the Department of Veterans Affairs address a disability claims backlog.

The GOP offered its own veterans bill — sponsored by Sen. Richard M. Burr, R-N.C. — that included much of the Sanders package and a provision on additional Iran sanctions.

The issue derailed the Sanders bill because Democrats, who control 55 votes in the Senate, could not win the Republican votes needed for the 60 votes required to overcome a procedural hurdle.

Some Republicans worried that if an Iran sanctions amendment were offered, the Ukraine aid package could suffer the same fate.

“As much as I am for Iran sanctions, no I don’t want to confuse the two national security crises,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. “I think I am sort of the Iran sanctions guy [in the Senate]. I would say ‘no, stand down.’

“The president is upping his game in the last 24 hours,” Graham continued. “Keep it up Mr. President. The House is moving; I like the way we are pushing back.”

Graham said he wouldn’t put too much stock in a vote scheduled for March 16 for the Crimean people to decide whether to secede from Ukraine. The Crimean regional government voted to secede Thursday.

“This effort to have a vote on the fate of the Crimea in two weeks is a joke,” Graham said. “Can you imagine voting against Putin with a tank outside your door?”

Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., said he too thinks the two issues should be kept on different tracks.

“I voted for our version of the VA bill because it had the Iran sanctions in it and I think we ought to do that,” Isakson said. “Ukraine is a specific issue based on Russian provocation. We probably should address it singularly.”

Tom

March 7, 2014
6:02 a.m.

I agree with Republicans prob 3/4 of the time but sanctions on Iran are the last thing we need….again. We’ve had opportunity to mend relations with them time and time again and we just hold our ground when they are giving us a fair deal. It happened with Bush in 2002, it happened with Obama in 2010/11. One of the only things I can say I approve that he has done is his most recent endeavor to repair, or should I say, restart relations with Iran.

Stephen Barlow

March 7, 2014
9:44 a.m.

SCUTTLING long overdue much needed healthcare for 13 years of WOUNDED WARRIORS who wait 1000 days for treatment because scuttling the Peace Process with Iran THAT IS WORKING is more important ISN’T ENOUGH TREASON for the Republicans.

The RAPE GUARANTEE for women in the military, which is what SCUTTLING Gillibrand’s Military Sexual Assault protections amounts to, ISN’T ENOUGH SEXIST TREASON to perpetrate on our female warriors… these FASCISTS OF THE GOP are going to push to SUPPORT PUTIN on the Crimean package as well.

ALl the UKraine needs to do is ASK for NATO to help Just like Kuwait did. We are TREATY BOUND to move forces from Afghanistan (saying f*ck you Karzai) 1000 miles to hold “joint Ukrainian-American ‘manuvers RIGHT ON THE RUSSIAN BORDER. We can land them on the Western Crimea and then we can watch Putin put up a “Crimean Wall”.

Frankly, I think we should turn in our “World Police badge and just use ‘Putin Squads’ (you know… markedly American armed, supplied and controlled “local troops” to make policy changes anywhere on the globe we want.

HEY!!! Let the Ukraine hire BLACKWATER with the aide package!!!! Then Putin would have no defence

This would also be a great time to put a resolution before the entire UN to REMOVE THE SOVIETS, er Russian Federation from the Security Council. Because without THAT voice, Syria would fall.

March 7, 2014
4:15 p.m.

Anonymous

July 4, 2015
3:28 p.m.

I have recently started a blog, the information you offer on this website has helped me tremendously. Thank you for all of your time & work. “The more sand that has escaped from the hourglass of our life, the clearer we should see through it.” by Jean Paul.

July 19, 2015
9:23 a.m.

Anonymous

July 21, 2015
12:59 a.m.

I’m really loving the theme/design of your site. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility issues? A handful of my blog visitors have complained about my website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have any ideas to help fix this problem?

Anonymous

July 24, 2015
5:49 a.m.

Superb website you have here but I was curious if you knew of any user discussion forums that cover the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really love to be a part of community where I can get comments from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Thanks a lot!

Anonymous

July 28, 2015
10:09 a.m.

Anonymous

July 31, 2015
10:45 a.m.

A person essentially help to make severely posts I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this actual put up amazing. Magnificent process!

Roll Call Video Picks

About #WGDB

Niels Lesniewski has covered the Senate for CQ Roll Call since January 2010, and more recently as a staff writer and resident procedure guru for Roll Call. Niels holds degrees in both government and theater but sometimes can't tell the difference between the two. @nielslesniewski