Ninth Circuit Cover-Up of Court Corruption

WASHINGTON, Dec. 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Full Disclosure Network® presents a six minute video news report at the URL: http://www.fulldisclosure.net/Blogs/83.php in the ongoing cable TV series entitled “Judicial Benefits & Court Corruption”. On December 16, 2009 a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals three judge panel issued an “unpublished” decision in the contempt of court case involving jailed Anti-Trust Attorney Richard I. Fine. When Fine learned the opinion was designated as “unpublished” and “not be used as precedent” he described the three Judge panel’s opinion (Reinhardt, Trott, Wardlaw) as having “succumbed to the cancer of corruption and the criminals in judicial robes.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/24355674/9thCircuitDenialWHC12-16-09

At issue was L.A. Superior Court Judge David Yaffe’s refusal to step down after Fine attempted to disqualify the judge from sitting on a case where he had received illegal payments from L.A. County, who was a party to the case Marina Strand Colony II Homeowners Association v. County of Los Angeles. Then Yaffe sentenced Fine to jail, indefinitely, without bail, without a hearing date and without a release date.

Partial response from Richard Fine to 9th Circuit ruling from his jail-cell telephone:

The panel has violated hundreds of years of established Judicial Precedent and the Supreme Court Precedent In Re Murchison where it was held that “no man can be a judge in his own case”

There is a 2007 FRAP 32.1 Rule established by Supreme court ruling and implemented by the Judicial Council that says a court may not prohibit or restrict citation of appellate court rulings.

“The Ninth Circuit Court has deteriorated to the level of the developing countries that are war torn, that the United States has been critical of…”