When he couldn't convert his match points, that was nerves more than anything else, and most of those shots were winners from Philipousis, and not unforced errors that he made.

No, he showed his major flaws, i.e. complacancy and the inability to maintain form beyond the second set. If he played every set as well as his first he'd be right up there with the best. Sadly it never is. But once he got to the third set he was making typical "lazy" shots.

(Original post by Zapsta)
No, he showed his major flaws, i.e. complacancy and the inability to maintain form beyond the second set. If he played every set as well as his first he'd be right up there with the best. Sadly it never is. But once he got to the third set he was making typical "lazy" shots.

The second set was very good as well.

I just think Philipoussis was getting better as the game when on, and it put Henman under a bit of pressure, but he managed to handle it and win the game.

(Original post by Zapsta)
No, he showed his major flaws, i.e. complacancy and the inability to maintain form beyond the second set. If he played every set as well as his first he'd be right up there with the best. Sadly it never is. But once he got to the third set he was making typical "lazy" shots.

A few, yes. But he completely outclassed Philippousis in the first and second sets, and thoroughly deserved his win Anyone reckon he might make the final this year? I think if he plays like that, he will... he won't win it, but the final is easily within his grasp, surely!

(Original post by DazYaZZZ)
LOOOL HAHAHAHA that was funny about the cyclops but it doesnt make sense LOL

Yes it does. Cyclops is the eletcronic machine that indicates whether the ball is out or not, or whether a fault has been made. The ball was out, and the umpire waited for Cyclops to call it, but it didn't.