Indonesian National Medical Guide Now Declares Homosexuality To Be A Mental Disorder

The Health Ministry of Indonesia is set to publish their health manual this week. It has also made news because it refers to homosexuality and homosexual behavior as a mental disorder. This comes at the same time as Indonesia is seeking to pass a law formally criminalizing homosexuality:

Indonesia is about to publish a medical guide where it has listed homosexuality as a mental disorder, the Health Ministry said on Friday.

According to the guide, lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transsexuals community are at risk of mental disorders owing to their sexual orientation, the Ministry’s Director of Prevention and Control for Mental Problems told Efe news.

The guide is based on two reports — one drafted in 2016 by the Indonesian Psychiatrists Association (PDSKJ ..

It also recommended certain rights for the LGBTQ group such as access to treatment and medical awareness.

The Ministry document stated that “homosexuality was against the ethos of the country”.

The Indonesian Parliament is currently discussing an amendment to the penal code to criminalize homosexuality in the country.

Homosexuality is legal in Indonesia, except in the Aceh province, in Sumatra island, where the Islamic Sharia law is in force. (source)

This is great news, since while Indonesia is a Muslim country, they are adopting a moral position on homosexuality that mirrors Christian teaching more than Islamic teaching.

Remember as we have said, that in spite of the propaganda today, Islam is actually pro-homosexual because it defines homosexuality as male-on-male copulation between two masculine men. It does not ban copulation between a masculine man and an effeminate male. In an interesting perspective on homosexuality, because it asserts that transsexuality is permissible and is not homosexuality even though the actions are the EXACT same thing, the only difference being the presentation and intentions of the participants. Hence this is the reason why any law in a Muslim nation that bans homosexuailty would have to be examined, as the law might ban certain forms but not the actions altogether given this particular characteristic of Islam.

However, it is to the credit of Indonesia that they recognized, to quote the words of the Catecheism of the Catholic Church, the “intrinsically disordered” nature of homosexuality and are attempting to do something to stop or curb its presence in society. The medical view that homosexuality is a “mental disorder” is a major step in this direct, and while it is being presented now as a “regression” of sorts, the fact is that homosexuality was always in psychological circles classified this way until relatively recently.

As Psychology Today notes, homosexuality was historically defined as a sin until the 19th century, when it became popular to speak of it as a “mental disorder.” While the Bible is clear that homosexuality is a sin and this certainly does not take the place of any modernist interpretation of the act attempting to give an explanation to human vice and choice, both definitions stated that homosexual activity was not natural. When the American Psychological Association published the Diagnostic Statistical Manual, which is the official book used to “define” mental disorders in 1968, homosexuality was listed as one of those disorders. It was not until 1973, five years later, in a meeting to update the book that homosexuality was voted out.

However, homosexuality did not disappear from the DSM. For the next decade and a half, it was redefined as “sexual orientation disturbance. ” It was not until 1987 that even this term was removed and any connection between sodomy and some kind of psychological issue fully removed. It is interesting to note as well that 1987 was the year in which the infamous “Gay Manifesto” was published which promised that over the next several decades, homosexuals were going to attempt to reform public discourse that would give public acceptance and approbation to their deeds, and in time to convince people that anybody who disagreed with their unnatural and perverse ways of living would be destroyed, for after explaining how homosexuality will be legalized and those who disagree will be stabbed to death, it then describes what the transformation will look like, which is a return to a Spartanesque, pagan society whose description could have been pulled from the pages of a writing from antiquity:

“We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

“Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of thedevices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

“We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

“There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled. We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

“The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

“All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

“The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of themajor requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

“We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

“We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

“Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.”

The utter hatred and violent desires expressed by the Gay manifesto are central to the LGBT agenda, and all of what the Manifesto proposed to do has progressively come true over the last 30 years, albeit with some slight changes. The vitriol has not changed, but the way in which it has been marketed to the society has in order to get people to accept homosexuality as normal and good, which the majority have already done throughout the Western world.

Modern contraception and pornography have been essential to making this transition because all pornography is inherently homosexual. When it comes to the physical act, what separates the two is that heterosexual behavior, when properly conducted, can lead to the generation of new life, whereas homosexual behavior is inherently sterile. This does not mean that a man and a woman NEED to conceive or “attempt” to conceive, but that once sexual relations is over, there must remain the possibility that conception could happen. Hence, it is the reason why even in spite of the propaganda about “repression”, the Catholic Church is quite liberal with the type of activity one can do between a husband and a wife provided that it ends with the man ejaculating into the woman’s vagina- this is the only condition that must be absolutely met without exception since this is the way that God designed the human body’s reproductive faculties. Any pleasure, mutual bonding, or “fun” that may come from doing this is considered good but something extra.

Homosexuals cannot reproduce by the very nature of their relations. This is distinct from a man or woman who may be sterile as a result of natural issues- such a union is not explicitly forbidden because as long as a the couple follows Catholic teaching, there is (with the grace of God) the possibility for conception. To the contrary, a man cannot produce a child with another man, and a woman cannot produce a child with another woman EVER by any natural means because the act itself is unnatural. The only thing that homosexual can experience each other is “mutual pleasure,” in which case and as homosexual themselves admit is the end objective, to maximize the pleasure for the other person by any and all means possible. This is nothing more than a glorified form of masturbation, since masturbation is the seeking of sexual pleasure by means and for ends that are intrinsically non-genitive, except instead of masturbating with one’s hand he is masturbating with another man’s anus.

Now the seeking of pleasure for the sake of pleasure is not just non-genitive, it is also anti-Christian because it seeks delight for the sake of delight and not for a higher good. Like a drug user who needs to progress to harder and harder drugs in order to recall the “high” that he received with his first drug, the homosexual will need to move to more perverse and deranged forms of sodomy in order to get “high” that he first gets when he participates in the movement. What may have began as a fascination with other men’s penises, touching other men, and making out with other men turns into “bug chasing” parties (where groups of men with HIV or AIDS will repeatedly sodomize men without HIV in order to intentionally transmit the virus), “fisting” (where men shove their hands, arms, feet, legs, and even heads or other objects into a homosexual’s anus), eating feces, drinking gallons of semen, and all kinds of other sicknesses that are as unsanitary as they are destructive.

As noted earlier, the homosexuals want to revive the “spartan ideal,” or a return to a pagan, pre/anti-Christian society where men’s bodies are worshiped and sodomy is a religious ritual. This is the end goal, and the transition has been slowly taking place over the last thirty years and continues today. Part of this transition is to revive the idea of “fetishism” because as noted above, a sexual fetish often leads to the seeking of sexual pleasure outside of any genitive end.

People have always had sexual fixations. The doctor-nurse, nurse-patient, teacher-student, older-younger, white-black, are just a few of the very common ones that people have, and they are not necessarily bad unto themselves, but often times can become bad. For example, a husband may want his wife to dress up as a “nurse” and he pretends to be her “patient” so she can “examine” him. This is fine, so long as they are not engaging in fornication and the action ends with the husband ejaculating in his wife’s vagina. However, the reality is that such things almost never end this way, since many times the people having sex are not married and they do not intend to have children. Just like with homosexuality, their actions, while heterosexual, are nothing more than glorified forms of masturbation and thus are homosexual in nature.

As mentioned earlier, contraception has played a major role in facilitating this change because contraception is inherently homosexual since it defeats the genitive purpose for sexual activity. By stopping any chance of conception- and it does not matter if it is the condom or the pill- sexual activity has no purpose outside of masturbating with the other person’s body. Pornography too, as mentioned, is equally wrong because while most pornography is directed towards men, all pornography serves to do is to attempt to project the self into one of the people in the video for the purpose of seeking pleasure with no end potential for generation. It is just another form of masturbating, except with a computer or CD.

Since the 1970s, there has been an explosion of pornography, and just like with drugs or homosexuality, there has been a transition from “normal” sexual relations with certain small “taboos” to very, very hard forms of pornography that are now the de-facto standard for the industry. With this has come a natural transition to homosexuality because the more perverse one becomes the more one reflects the perversity of the LGBT. For example, all pornographic actresses will admit that anal sex is a veritable “prerequisite” for the industry and is to be expected in most films, when 30 years ago such activity was considered “extreme.” Along with this includes activities such as group sex, drinking semen from sometimes dozens of men, ATM (“ass-to-mouth”, as in engaging in sodomy and then fellatio immediately after), choking, and even rape on camera (such as the infamous “Ghetto Gaggers”, “Latina Abuse,” or “Facial Abuse,” which are very popular websites that have had multiple accusations of rape on camera leveled against them). While all of these things are considered ‘new developments’ for the adult industry, all of them came directly from the homosexual porn industry, which in turn derived its practices from homosexual circles.

All of these perversions have served to alter public opinion about matters of “taste” in sexuality. Anal sex has been aggressively promoted in major magazines to men and women (just look at any issue of Cosmopolitan sometime in the supermarket), as well as an entire range of fetishes (just look at the underwear website Yandy.com’s “Costume” section). Transsexualism and the entire idea that one can not just choose one’s gender, but being “gender fluid” is related to all of this, because it defines gender as the means by which one identified and seeks pleasure and therefore makes pleasure the end of the one’s identity. The LGBT has embraced this transition, saying that not only are homosexuals part of the “LGBT” community, but also “allies,” “curious,” “friends and family,” and now, “kink.”

According to a recent story from TheGayUK, the full acronym for LGBT is LGBTQQICAPF2K+, or abbreviated as “LGBT+” for short:

There is now a K to add to the ever-growing LGBT+ acronym – and apparently, it stands for “kink”. The acronym which has grown since the 90s, out of a need to move away from the limiting “gay community” adds letters to encompass any community that defines itself as anything but heterosexual or cisgender.

The LGBT initialism was coined in the late 80s / early 90s.

So what do all the letters mean?

L – lesbian

G – gay

B – bisexual

T – transgender

Q – queer

Q – questioning

I – intersex

A – asexual

A – agender

A – ally

C – curious

P – pansexual

P – polysexual

F – friends and family

2 – two-spirit

K – kink

However, the addition of the K has been met with some reticence from many on the question website, Quora. Users were quick to dismiss Kink as part of the LGBT+ community.

Sarah remarked, “Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t believe that fetishes belong in the same acronym as sexualities and gender identity”.

While Caitlin added, “However, I and others believe that it shouldn’t be included in the acronym. Kink is not inherently non-cis or non-straight, and including it can feed into the stereotype of queer people being “sexual deviants”. BDSM is fine in a community of its own but it’s strange and unnecessary to include it with sexual orientations and gender identities”.

John wrote, “I’m gay, and I do not and will not use this silly LGBTQLAPK sh*t. They keep adding a silly letter for inclusion. You are just labelling yourselves, and that is a silly thing to do.” (source, archived here)

Remember, a “kink” per Wikipedia is:

The term “kink” has been claimed by some who practice sexual fetishism as a term or synonym for their practices, indicating a range of sexual and sexualistic practices from playful to sexual objectification and certain paraphilias. In the 21st century the term “kink”, along with expressions like BDSM, leather and fetish, has become more commonly used than the term paraphilia. Some universities also feature student organizations focused on kink, within the context of wider LGBTI concerns. In this setting, kink can be seen as one of the variations that make up the “Q” in LGBTQ.

Kink sexual practices go beyond what are considered conventional sexual practices as a means of heightening the intimacy between sexual partners. Some draw a distinction between kink and fetishism, defining the former as enhancing partner intimacy, and the latter as replacing it. Because of its relation to “normal” sexual boundaries, which themselves vary by time and place, the definition of what is and is not kink varies widely as well. (source)

So, just like with pornography then and today or “soft” versus “hard” drugs, “kinks” likewise can have “soft” and “hard” versions.

A “soft” one might be a “nurse-patient” fetish, as noted earlier.

But where does it end?

This is why the LGBT movement is now making clear room to accommodate the concept of “kink,” because philosophically speaking it is of the same nature as that of the LGBT, defining the purpose of sexuality for the pursuit of pleasure rather than for any sort of genitive ends.

If one looks at a drug junkie, one knows that man’s capacity for vice is only as limited as how far he is able to indulge his vices. If he is given permission, he will attempt to eventually go as far as he can in pursuing it.

Could a “kink” mean pedophilia? Absolutely, as the homosexuals have already been trying to legalize.

Could a “kink” mean bestiality? Absolutely, which is something else they have been trying to legalize too.

Now as noted earlier, pornography and homosexuality are linked, and whatever happens in the homosexual porn world eventually becomes normalized among heterosexual porn and in time, among the general public, for they are the ones who consume the material.

What you are witnessing is the normalization of the worst forms of human sexual abuses, almost once entirely concentrated among the homosexuals, attempting to diffuse into the heterosexual masses.

But not to worry- it is already happening:

Meet Amy Lew, known as “Whitney Wisconsin.” For the last three years, she has been producing videos dedicated on her channel to promoting bestiality. Recently, she was arrested with her boyfriend and is facing a series of charges for crimes such as public indecency, lewd behavior, and now child pornography:

More charges were filed today against an Eau Claire man accused of possessing child pornography.

Erio Oliver, 28, was charged with 14 additional counts of having child porn and is tied to nine pictures and five videos investigators say they found on a laptop, seized in 2015.

The criminal complaint filed Tuesday, said authorities linked Oliver to recording pornographic videos of his girlfriend at the time – Amy Lew, who used the name “Whitney Wisconsin”.

We reported before that according to one study, 25% of teenagers in California are claiming to be “gender fluid.” Another much larger study conducted recently, which surveyed 81,000 teenagers in Minnesota, found that at least 3% identify as “transgender” and do not identify with “gendered” pronouns, which came as a surprise to the researchers:

Far more U.S. teens than previously thought are transgender or identify themselves using other nontraditional gender terms, with many rejecting the idea that girl and boy are the only options, new research suggests.

The study looked at students in ninth and 11th grade and estimated that nearly 3 percent are transgender or gender nonconforming, meaning they don’t always self-identify as the sex they were assigned at birth. That includes kids who refer to themselves using neutral pronouns like “them” instead of “he” or “she.”

“Diverse gender identities are more prevalent than people would expect,” said lead author Nic Rider, a University of Minnesota postdoctoral fellow who studies transgender health.

The study is an analysis of a 2016 statewide survey of almost 81,000 Minnesota teens. (source)

All of the LGBT and the new definitions of gender, sexuality, and preferences that it is promoting are evil, for they are just different manifestations of the perversion of the heart, defined by their intrinsic sterility and that all lead to the same miserable end. There is nothing new about them intrinsically, as they have all happened before. There is nothing new they can contribute, because God is the author of sexuality and He made it perfect.

The only thing that man can do, and is actively doing, is to find a thousand ways to destroy himself and his neighbor. This is what is happening in the western world, and the people are adapting it because they have chosen to.

Meanwhile, as we noted earlier, the Muslim nation of Indonesia has chosen to adopt the traditional American medical definition of homosexuality, even in spite of what Islam teaches.

Now Islam has a lot of evils in the religion that are a part of its theology. Make no mistake, Islam is not the way to heaven. However, as it is always important to remember, the law of God is written in the hearts of all men, and God desires that all men be brought to the truth and that if they are not in the truth, that by their actions they would take measures to follow in the path of truth.

It is interesting that Indonesia, who is spite of her Muslim background is adopting a view that is significantly more aligned to Christian teaching about homosexuality. This compares to the “enlightened” western world that is now promoting all kinds of sexual fetishes and desires as “normal,” so long as they do not involve the purpose for which sexuality is created, which is procreation.

Is defending the LGBT and all of the perversity it promotes a defense of “western values?” There are many in the counter-jihad movement who would argue this to be so.

There are many Muslims coming to the Western world, either by their own means or by subsidized travel via governments through “refugee” programs. They are changing the society and these changes may be long term. Some people say that the Western world, at least as it has been known for centuries, will be destroyed.

In the Bible, Israel was destroyed many times for her sins, for as much as God forgave her and called her back, when Israel refused to repent God loosed the force of His justice and allowed Israel to suffer for her misdeeds that she brought upon herself.

Homosexuality is one of four sins that the Bible explicitly says “cries out to heaven for vengeance” and is “worthy of death.” What is to be said of a society who embraces homosexuality? How about if that society promotes homosexuality, protects homosexuality, and then attacks people for saying that homosexuality is wrong?

All societies have their problems, and Islam is an evil religion, but homosexuality is evil too. And the Western World does not want forgiveness from promoting homosexuality and all of the perversion that come from it, at least at this point.

So who is the real savage here? The Muslims, or the pagans of the Western world?