Tor & Other Anonymous Networks

Knowledgeable Criminal Defense Lawyers in Omaha

If you are facing criminal charges involving a computer sex offense, you
are already under tremendous stress. You should not have to worry about
educating your lawyer. At McGoughLaw P.C. L.L.O., we have an in-depth
understanding of criminal charges involving complex technology.

Many people turn to resources like bitcoin, Silk Road, and Tor (the onion
router) to protect their privacy online. However, law enforcement agencies
have also taken an interest in these matters, pursuing charges of computer
crimes more frequently and aggressively.

At McGoughLaw P.C. L.L.O., we are familiar with these resources and understand
how law enforcement pursues computer sex crimes. Our sex crime lawyers
in Omaha can protect your rights and your reputation if you have been
falsely accused or charged with a computer sex crime.

Call us at (402) 614-8655 to get started with a free consultation. We
take on cases throughout Nebraska and even handle federal cases in Iowa.

We Know the Networks

In recent years, federal law enforcement agencies have stepped up monitoring
and prosecuting sex crimes committed over these networks — including
prostitution, solicitation, and the hosting or viewing of illegal pornography.
These cases are extremely complex not only from a legal standpoint but
also from a technical one.

We are here to educate you — not the other way around. Our Omaha
sex crime lawyers will help you understand the laws and issues as they
apply to your case. Our legal experience, technical knowledge, and aggressive
approach ensure that we will explore every possible defense against your
charges, maximizing your chances of success.

Our unique grasp of complex, technical cases also benefits the many attorneys
and law firms with whom we partner throughout Nebraska. We are respected
by our colleagues as a premier resource for these issues.

Aggressive Internet Sex Crime Defense throughout Nebraska

From our office in Omaha, we represent people accused of computer crimes
throughout Nebraska, including people from other states who are facing
trial here. We will resolve as much of your case as possible online or
via telephone to minimize your travel obligations.

To learn more and discuss your case with our team of proven legal professionals,
please fill out our
contact form or call (402) 614-8655.

Client Success Stories

Theft

Defendant was charged with embezzling more than $300,000.00, from a previous employer. At the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm highlighted a number of inconsistencies and questionable statements. The State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.
Defendant was charged with burglary. At the preliminary hearing, we created a record that established that the State had very little corroborated evidence against our client. After the hearing, we filed a motion to suppress, arguing that the charges should be dismissed because the State could not prove that our client was involved in the burglary. Shortly before a hearing on our motion, the State contacted us and agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.
Defendant was charged in federal court with embezzling several thousand dollars. Following our investigation and providing relevant information to the Government and the Court, the Court agreed to sentence our client to probation with no jail time.
Defendant was charged in federal court with cheating the Government out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Following our investigation and settlement negotiations with the Government, the Court agreed to sentence our client to probation without having to go to jail.

Other Offenses

Defendant was charged with possession of child pornography and was previously represented by a different attorney. Defendant came to us for help because his current attorney was not able to get the matter resolved from Defendant. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss all felony charges against our client. Based upon our presentation to the Court at sentencing, the Court agreed to sentence our client to probation without having to go to jail.
Defendant was charged with carrying a concealed weapon. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found our client Not Guilty.
Defendant was charged in federal court with impersonating an officer. Following an investigation and information presented to the Government, the Government agreed to dismiss the charges against our client.
Defendant was charged with child endangerment and was previously represented by a different attorney. Defendant came to us for help because her current attorney was not able to get the matter resolved for Defendant. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.
Defendant was previously sentenced to several years in prison. Defendant had been represented by a different lawyer. Our firm was asked to review the case to determine if there was anything that could be done to reduce Defendant's sentence. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State and Court, our client was re-sentenced to time served and released from prison.

Drug Possession

Defendant was charged with possessing a large quantity of marijuana. Following
a complete investigation by our firm, the State agreed to dismiss all
charges against our client. Defendant was charged with carrying numerous
pounds of marijuana. Following a suppression hearing where several statements
made by the arresting officer were called into question, the State dismissed
the felony possession charge. At sentencing, we presented evidence and
information that convinced the Court to sentence our client to probation
with no jail time. Defendant was charged with carrying numerous pounds
of marijuana. Following a complete investigation by our firm, the State
agreed to give the Defendant a deferred sentence which would not appear
on his record. Our client avoided any criminal conviction and avoided
a jail sentence. Defendant was charged with possessing drugs found at
the airport. After our investigation and presentation of materials to
the State, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client.
Defendant was charged with possession of prescription drugs. Following
a successful suppression hearing where the Court ruled that the State
could not use certain evidence against our client, the State agreed to
dismiss all felony charges against our client. At sentencing on a reduced
misdemeanor charge, we were successful in convincing the Court to sentence
our client to probation with no jail time. Defendant was charged with
possession of prescription drugs while a student at college. After our
investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed
to refer the matter to diversion. This resulted in our client not having
any criminal charges on his record. Defendant was charged with drug conspiracy
and possession of a weapon. Following a hearing challenging the Government's
evidence, the Court sustained our motion to suppress and ruled that the
Government did not have probable cause to stop, detain or search our client.

Assaults

Defendant was charged with child abuse resulting in death. Following the investigation of our firm, depositions of key witnesses and presentation of our findings to the prosecutor, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client.
Defendant was charged with assaulting an officer. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found our client not guilty.
Defendant was charged with assault. Following our investigation and presentation of relevant information to the State, the State agreed to dismiss the charges against our client.
Defendant was charged with assault with a deadly weapon. Following our investigation and presentation of materials to the State, the State agreed to dismiss all charges against our client.

Sexual Offenses

Defendant was charged with sexual assault of a minor. At the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm got the alleged victim to confess that she made the whole thing up. Charges were dropped against our client. Defendant was charged with sexual assault. At the deposition of the alleged victim, a number of inconsistencies were identified and highlighted and the State dismissed all felony charges against our client. Defendant was charged with soliciting a minor from craigslist. After taking a deposition of the alleged victim, our firm was able to highlight a number of inconsistencies and questionable information and the State dismissed all felony charges against our client. Defendant was charged with sexual assault. During the deposition of the alleged victim, our firm got the alleged victim to admit that it was possible that all of the information provided to police was from a dream and was not real. The State dismissed all felony charges against our client. Defendant was charged with sexual abuse of a family member. Following a deposition of the alleged victim and complete investigation, demonstrating that a number of statements made by the alleged victim were questionable and inconsistent with other information, the State agreed to dismiss the charges. Defendant was charged with sexual assault. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found there was insufficient evidence to convict the Defendant. Our client was never convicted of the charge. Defendant was charged with multiple counts of sexual assault on family members. The matter proceeded to trial and the jury found Defendant not guilty of two charges and found there was insufficient evidence to convict on a third charge. Before Defendant could be retried on the third offense, the State agreed to dismiss all sexual offenses against our client. Defendant was charged with a sexual assault that the State claimed happened several years ago when the Defendant was a minor. We filed a Motion to transfer the matter to juvenile court, arguing that the matter should be dismissed. After our hearing, the State agreed to dismiss charges against our client.

A Reputation For Excellence

See What Our Clients Have To Say

“I was very pleased with the outcome of my case and all the work the Jim and everyone did for me.”

The information on this website is for general information purposes only.
Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual
case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt
or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.