The expansion of the expression
(let ([else #f]) (case 'foo [else 42]))
fails with the error "case: bad syntax (not a datum sequence) in:
else."
Is there a reason that a binding for the `else' identifier here must
prevent the use of an "else clause" in a case expression? If the
definition of case is comparing the binding of the provided `else' to
its own, could it instead simply check for symbol equality?
Incidentally, where can I find the definition of the case macro?
-Casey