Family Law

I am developing a scholarly and social-justice advocacy interest in what might be called philosophical issues in family law. Family law addresses many important issues, but my main interest is child-custody decisions in divorce or separation cases. These issues are philosophical insofar as concerns about justice, fairness and the analysis of controversial concepts are at their core.

Arguably, the ideally fair and just outcome in such cases is a "shared parenting arrangement," where the child (or children) is under the care of each parent approximately 50% of the time and, of course, each parent has his or her child (or children) approximately 50% of the time. This is supported by concerns about children's rights, parents' rights, children's best interest, parents' best interests, and more.

Although becoming more common, "shared parenting" is not the norm, for a variety of complex reasons. The common practice is that child(ren) is with one parent most of the time and 'visit' with the other parent, every other weekend and one night a week.

Shared parenting should be the norm, however, and changes can be made in the the legal and court system to make that happen.

The relevant laws, regulations and procedures are mostly state specific. I am working with concerned individuals in Georgia to (1) make shared parenting a more readily available option (since the legal system is built around the assumption that there will be a "primary custodial parent" and a "non-custodial parent," and shared parenting doesn't fit that mold) and (2) create a shared parenting presumption, so that the legal burden is on those who argue that the initial position of equality and fairness is inappropriate for this particular case (in contrast to the current informal presumption, which requires arguing for equality and fairness). (I have noticed that many attorneys who opposed shared parenting presumptions misrepresent them as shared parenting mandates or requirements, which nobody argues for).

In addition to the legal and philosophical concerns about justice and fairness, there are also important concerns about gender norms, stereotypes and prejudices ('women and mothers are like this... men and fathers are like that...'), as well as social scientific questions about the psychological and emotional consequences of different custody arrangements. These issues also raise questions about the legal industry itself and whether there are alternative, less costly -- financially and emotionally -- ways for parents and children to achieve justice and fairness.

No comments:

Nathan Nobis

1000-Word Philosophy

1000-Word Philosophy

Animals & Ethics 101

Real Life: This is not a Game: Personal Finance for Young Adults (paperback)

Real Life: This is not a Game: Personal Finance for Young Adults (Kindle)

Search This Blog

About

"The ultimate measure of a person is not where he or she stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he or she stands at times of challenge and controversy." - Martin Luther King, Jr. (Morehouse, '48)