It doesn't matter if age, health and weight should be issues; the fact of the matter is they will be issues....and I can say this right now, health
is a legitimate issue; however, when you start in on a woman's age or weight, you are playing with fire. I know it's a double standard, but it is a
fact of life...just ask your wives and/or girlfriends. The GOP would be wise to avoid those two subjects as 2016 approaches.

I don't think her weight, age or health should be an issue, but her lack of integrity certainly should be. She isn't a good enough liar to be
president, and she isn't smart enough to cover her own tracks when she messes up.
And then there's the severe brain damage issue caused by her fall that left her unable to testify at the Benghazi hearings....

originally posted by: LeatherNLace
It doesn't matter if age, health and weight should be issues; the fact of the matter is they will be issues....and I can say this right now, health
is a legitimate issue; however, when you start in on a woman's age or weight, you are playing with fire. I know it's a double standard, but it is a
fact of life...just ask your wives and/or girlfriends. The GOP would be wise to avoid those two subjects as 2016 approaches.

In general terms, the physical and mental health of every candidate should be an issue for the nominating parties and the general electorate. That is
why the same should be said of the Vice Presidential candidates as well since the inference is that they could become the President.

If we are talking about the accusations against her by a political rival, my personal opinion is that was nothing more than mud-slinging. And it
appears to have back-fired as that sort of tactic should.

Given that candidates are no longer individuals, but representatives of a group with an agenda and a focused agenda I am more focused on the items on
the Party's agenda than the health of the figurehead.

It seems that in the upcoming elections, Republicans and Democrats seek to differenciate themselves is by nonsense like age, weight, sex, race, etc.
Take away those factors and they are pretty much the same.

Instead, we should be asking, "If we elect this Republican or that Democrat, will we have the same rights and freedoms when they leave office as when
they went in?"

Will she extend the Patriot Act?
Will she raise taxes?
With she extend NDAA?
Will she start new wars?
Will she push for gun control?
Will she encourage spying on Americans with drones etc?
Will she encourage "free speech" zones?

originally posted by: beezzer
Will she extend the Patriot Act?
Will she raise taxes?
With she extend NDAA?
Will she start new wars?
Will she push for gun control?
Will she encourage spying on Americans with drones etc?
Will she encourage "free speech" zones?

originally posted by: beezzer
Will she extend the Patriot Act?
Will she raise taxes?
With she extend NDAA?
Will she start new wars?
Will she push for gun control?
Will she encourage spying on Americans with drones etc?
Will she encourage "free speech" zones?

I could care less if she poops her pants on a daily basis.

I would answer Yes to all the above...

Then her health is secondary.

But I'm glad you brought up this topic seeing as this will be present for most of the media and will ignore any lasting impacts ol' Hillary
"Tubby" Clinton might enforce on those of us who would suffer under her rule.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.