In his January 6, 1999 State of the State address, Governor Kempthorne
announced his plans to implement an aggressive vaccination agenda.
Although mounting evidence is linking the widespread use of vaccines to the
epidemics of psychological and physiological disorders such as Attention
Deficit Disorder and cancer, the governor insists that we must vaccinate as
many children as possible regardless of the dangers of vaccines to the
health and well-being of children. Reading the following article will give
you insight into why the governor is willing to ignore the evidence and
support an aggressive vaccination agenda. You will learn that vaccines are
not about disease prevention: Vaccines are big business.

The Children's Vaccination Iniative

by Kris Gaublomme, MD

The United Nations distributes a booklet called The CVI
Strategic Plan: Managing Opportunity and Chance. A vision of
Vaccination for the 21st Century. It is a most interesting piece of
literature for those who want to understand how vaccination policy
works. We will, therefore, have a closer look at the document.

The players

The Children's Vaccine Initiative (CVI) was founded following the
1990 New York World Summit for Children. It is a global
coalition of organizations from the public, non-governmental and
private sectors, including the vaccine industry, Working
together... new scientific developments to increase protection
from infectious diseases, and to simplify vaccine delivery to benefit
all the world's children. It is not so much a new structure or
Organization, but a coordination of powers with the aim to serve a
specific goal in a very efficient way.

The first CVI Strategic Plan was prepared in 1992/93.

Most participants of CVI are associated with national or
international health organizations, or scientific research
institutes. From a distance it looks like those people can claim
intellectual immunity and commercial virginity. But what about
official representatives of pharmaceutical firms directly involved
with vaccine production, such as SmithKIine Beecham, Pasteur M66eux
Connaught, and Merck? Is there any reason to believe they could
possibly be neutral in designing a strategic plan? There certainly
is not.

The Rockefeller Foundation

The Rockefeller Foundation is a private foundation with a mandate 'to
promote the well-being of mankind throughout the world' by making
grants to individuals and institutions as well as by operating a
number of own programs. It was founded in 1913 by J.D. Rockefeller,
a very wealthy American industrialist. During the second half of the
past century he was the leader in the USA oil business, and the owner
of the world's largest oil refinery industry. He accumulated a
personal fortune of over $1 billion. He was condemned by the U.S.
Supreme Court for violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and retired
shortly after that. He then directed his efforts into
philanthropy, spending half of his personal fortune on
institutions invented by and dedicated to himself, such as the
Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller Institute for Medical
Research. Apparently, he was much interested in medicine. His son
John D. Jr. donated the land on which the United Nations headquarters
was built in New York. Other members of his offspring were governors
of Arkansas and West Virginia, one was elected to the U.S. Senate and
one was head of the Chase Manhattan Bank in New York.

So it is obvious that this family was very influential in both
political and financial circles.

From the very beginning they had excellent connections with the
United Nations., which is very important in understanding the entire
puzzle. The Rockefellers are business people to the marrow,
investing their money where it yields the highest profits. Vaccines,
for instance. In 1991 the foundation's assets were estimated at $1.9
billion.

The United Nations

The UN is the head of the giant octopus that is the real emperor of
this world.

The UN was founded at the end of World War II (1944) in order to
maintain international peace and security. In a short time it has
become very influential in every aspect of international relations:
Political (General Assembly), military (Security Council), legal
(International Court), social and economical (Ecosoc), medical (WHO)
and financial (Word Bank). From the beginning, the world leaders
(USA, Great Britain, France, the USSR and China) dictated a blueprint
for a new world order to the smaller nations. They continue to do so
up to this day, and even blackmail the whole organization if their
interests are not met (as did the USA by holding back its
contributions prior to the appointment of Kofi Annan to as UN General
Secretary in 1996).

The World Bank

The World Bank is the financial arm of the UN. It was established in
1944 to assist European postwar recovery. But soon enough, in 1949,
the focus shifted to international trade and economic development.
The World Bank began to grant huge loans to development countries,
imposing at the same time their conditions as to the political and
economical development of those countries. The third world was left
little choice: Either they complied with the conditions of the world
rulers in Geneva or they were left to themselves, with starvation as
the only perspective. The need to obtain favorable agreements about
repayment of the loans makes those countries even more dependent upon
the goodwill of international financial and political advisers. So,
in exchange for financial oxygen, they end up with their hands tied
up tightly on a political level. Once again the actual decisions are
made in Geneva or in Washington.

WHO

The World Health Organization (WHO) was established in 1948 with the
purpose to allow the highest possible level of health by all the
peoples. It is part of the UN. It is within the WHO that
international health standards are set, that research is directed and
that global health strategies are defined. Among those strategies
global immunization programs enjoy a high priority. The provision of
safe drinking water and the education of medical personnel are other
purposes.

UNICEF

Is the UN children's fund which was established in 1946. Being
responsible for child welfare programs in general, it is actively
involved in CVI and particularly promotes and financially supports
worldwide vaccination programs.

UNDP

The United Nations Development Programme is yet another part of the
UN which actively supports and promotes the global implementation of
vaccination programs.

The goals

The goal of CVI is described at length throughout the plan but is
well summarized in one sentence: The challenge for the 21st
century is to make sure that the enormous impact of vaccines on the
health and well- being of the population is maintained AND
expanded.

An evident goal is the maintenance of the present vaccination
schedules, eventually substituting an old vaccine like pertussis or
BCG by newer, more expensive ones.

But that is just a starting point. A whole set of vaccines presently
in their final stages of research and approval must be added
everywhere: Rota virus, pneumococcus, meningococcus and cholera
vaccine are near initial introduction (p.3).

And there is more to come: Research efforts currently under way
to develop new vaccines effective for the prevention of malaria,
tuberculosis, shigella dysentery, E.Coli, diarrhoea, respiratory
syncitlal virus (RS V), HIV and other infections ...are likely to
yield products or viable candidates in the next ten years...
(p. 3-4).

The alleged goal of CVI is to prevent childhood mortality from
infectious diseases through vaccination. The true objective,
however, is quite simple and transparent: The expansion of the
vaccine market. To shape the entire world into a docile recipient of
a multitude of vaccines, CVI intends to vaccinate everybody,
everywhere, at any age, against any disease, by any means, at any
cost_forever.

Everybody, everywhere, at any cost

The vaccine industry, or the pharmaceutical industry as a whole, is
too big for national borders. It wants to sell its products
worldwide, it wants a global marketplace for its products'
(p4). Wealthy countries are roused to pay for those who cannot
afford expanded vaccination programs, so that everybody on earth can
enjoy the blessings of vaccination. Touching, isn't? A
most commercial interpretation of solidarity anyway.

The quest for new markets is also reflected in the search for new
target groups. They look for target groups beyond infants and
women of childbearing age (p.6; 20). This includes to
promote the concept of vaccination as a preventive measure
relevant to all stages of life_infancy, childhood, adolescence,
adulthood and maturity (p.20). They want to identify
groups with low immunization rates and target them for innovative and
intensified efforts to increase access (p. 19). To make sure
no one escapes one has to identify and create appropriate
opportunities... for reaching unimmunized individuals' (p.20). Right
after birth, for instance, or before entering school or a profession.
We are already familiar with that trick.

Against any disease

Not only the present list of so-called
vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, hepatitis
B, Hib and rubella, have to be preserved, it also has to be expanded
with new ones. And this, if possible, at an ever rising pace. The
accelerated development and introduction of priority new and
improved vaccines is one of the main goals of CVI (p. 5)
(emphasis is mine). In order to hide the obvious idiocy of such a
multitude of vaccines, public resistance must be broken by measures
like the reduction of the number of injections or the substitution of
injection by oral or mucosal application of vaccines, vaccines
which will, simplify immunization

At any cost

The authors are quite aware that the expansion and adaptation of the
vaccination policy will cost handfuls of money. Increasingly
sophisticated production technology and higher development costs will
mean that future vaccines will cost more. (p. 4) Likewise, we
read that, it is clear that new vaccines of global appeal will
generally not be inexpensive products when initially
introduced. (p. 10). Also, The vaccine- financing
infrastructure must be expanded and strengthened to support the
introduction of new vaccines. Governments must take increasing
responsibility for financing their national vaccine needs as well as
their immunization programmes in general (p. 1 5).

Already development countries cannot afford the existing vaccines,
except at the cost of other, more basic health measures. But even in
developed countries, like the USA, it is obvious that many citizens
cannot afford simple social security, yet $billions are spent to have
them all vaccinated.

Isn't it kind of strange that, among the first priorities formulated
by CVI, we read promoting respect for and protection of
intellectual property? (p.5). What has this got to do with
saving children's lives? Nothing! What has it got to do with
defending the lucrative side of scientific monopolies? Everything!

It is obvious that selling vaccines to individuals is less profitable
than deals with the governments. One of the main aims of CVI,
therefore, is encouraging governments towards ... adequate
financing of immunization programmes... (p.5) and to
coordinate the donor community to encourage national
governments to take greater financial responsibility for their
vaccine supplies and immunization activities... (p.16).

In the next section of this article I will explain how we need to
understand what is meant by encourage. The question for
now is: What do they mean by adequate financing.

The answer, again, is quite simple. Governments should make
vaccination programmes the number one priority of their health policy
and spend as much as it takes to vaccinate everybody against every
disease possible. This strategy, evidently, has got tremendous
advantages. There is barely a need for expensive advertisement
campaigns when the governments incorporates a vaccine into the
official vaccination calendar. A pocketful of advisers are easier to
convince (not necessarily by scientific arguments) than the general
public or the entire medical body. The government disposes of much
vaster financial means than the public does. And last but not least:
If the government is actively engaged in the vaccine propaganda, it
is not likely to make a fuss about occasional
embarrassing side-effects.

By any means

It is quite remarkable that in order to obtain better health no
strategy is considered other than vaccination. Not a word about
basic measures like food and water supplies, sewage disposal, housing
conditions, education and employment. All of these are factors known
to highly influence public health, primarily in poorer countries. If
CVI does not seem to be much interested in those ways of helping, one
has a right to wonder why not.

Measures will be taken to increase the public acceptance of the
multitude of vaccines imposed. Combination vaccines and oral or
mucosal delivery systems are being investigated.

CVI wants to encourage governments to towards
adequate financing of immunization programmes(p5). What
does this mean in plain English? It means that national decision
makers have to be convinced, by all means, to drain all the national
health funds into the vaccine sewer-pipe. It means plain
manipulation. Lobbying has become common practice both on national
and international levels. It is the staggering amount of money
needed to carry this plan into effect that inspires its architects to
manipulate the decision makers.

One of the most despicable concepts of CVI is the manipulation of the
need for vaccines. Creating and expanding demand for vaccines'
(p. 6) is part of its supply strategy.

In order to free the last reader from the illusion of CVI's
objectives, it confesses to support social and behavioral
research designed to achieve a better understanding of factors
leading to increased social acceptance and use of vaccines
(p.6; 19). CVI wants to investigate the public's attitude toward its
willingness to pay for protection (p. 1 9). Words that
should belong rather in a senior member mafia meeting than in a WHO
brochure. In line with this is the intention toward increasing
the awareness of the value of vaccination to society and to national
decision-makers, thus increasing the demand for vaccines in all
countries (p.6) and inform the public and decision makers
on the value of disease prevention and the role of vaccination as a
cost-effective health intervention  (p.16.).

Inform translates to convince by turning the
propaganda system loose on the public. One powerful suggestion by
CVI: Promote the use of mass media sources, such as the
Internet, to address the value of immunization and
vaccines(p.21). And since the entire set up looks better if it
appears to be spontaneous, ensure participation of the
community (especially of mothers) in the planning and promotion of
immunization programmes (p.22). Finally, just to finish the
job, develop active information campaigns for the public on
immunization programmes, vaccines and the risk of infectious
diseases (p.22). CVI even boldly defines the term brainwashing
by stating that it must, Improve the credibility of national
and global demand forecasts... (p.16)

First sing your song, then make sure the right people listen to it by
bringing scientific dignitaries into the game to promote vaccines as
the only method to prevent disease.

CVI attributes it's accomplishments to the unique role that CVI
has as an Organization that facilitates interaction and
communication, especially between the private and public sectors of
the vaccine continuum (p.7). A few pages further, this
beautiful marriage grows into collaboration and cooperation
between public and private sectors (p.23).

Until the boundaries between both disappear completely? At other
levels, people go to jail for corruption of politicians. But not so
when it comes to health strategies because here the welfare of the
nation is at stake. So lobbyists become heroes instead of villains.

Another manipulation is to promote access to national delivery
systems and vaccines (p. 6; 19). CVI will establish a
clear agenda of action for decision-makers...  (p.22). The
translation of the previous statement is better understood as
preventing the policy makers from thinking for themselves!

Forever and a day

The idea is that worldwide vaccination can go on forever. The
pace of this innovation is expected to increase well into the next
century and beyond (p.4).

The means

The most important instrument in the vaccination strategy is what is
called the vaccine continuum. By that CVI means total
control over the entire vaccination chain, starting with the
definition of the needs (a magic bullet against dangerous infections
killing many people), continuing with the initiative for research on
a vaccine, the trials, the approval by quality control
bodies, production of the vaccine, the motivation of financial
powers to support all this, distribution, the brainwashing of policy
makers and professional health workers and the manipulation of the
media to convince the public of the need for more vaccines.

This is the illusionary script as designed by the vaccine industry.
A script that leaves no room to coincidence, independent political
decisions, or even democracy as such. Once a target is set on the
highest level, very predictably, some new scourge is described in
medical literature which, in turn, is echoed in popular medical
literature (e.g. the Guardian Press' free weekly magazine sponsored
by the same pharmaceutical companies), the press, TV and, finally, in
the proposals by national experts to the department of
health. Once one sees the pattern, it is all so transparent and
predictable, yet, apparently, nobody is able to stop this train.

The background

The CVI document confirms the observation that the scientific
background for the vaccine fanaticism is the awareness that the era
of unlimited antibiotic treatment and control of infectious disease
has come to an end. So other markets must be anticipated before the
day the use of antibiotics will collapse with a worldwide economic
rumble. As we have seen above, the potential market for vaccines is
unlimited because it comprises the entire world, with an unlimited
number of new diseases to be discovered and eliminated.

The motives

One criticism on the CVI document that would not be justified would
be to say there is a lack of transparency and honesty. Although the
entire project is scented with a deep concern for children and for
mankind worldwide, it does not even try to hide its deeper motives.
CVI puts so much stress upon the importance of intellectual property
rights (IPRs) that it becomes undeniable that this is its key
concern. These IPRs provide assurance to Investors that a
vaccine candidate will be able to find markets that provide a fair
return on invested funds. Without a good system to protect and
respect IPRs it is unlikely that new vaccines will become
available (p.13, emphasis is mine).

In other words: No financial gain, no vaccines. No matter how many
children die, no matter how much mankind is suffering, CVI's concerns
melt like snow in spring when financial profit is no longer
guaranteed.

Conclusions

There are some contradictions in the thinking of the authors of the
Strategic Plan.

On one hand, for instance, vaccination is promoted as the most
effective strategy as to prevention from infectious diseases.
Victory over smallpox and polio are claimed as their achievements.
But then if vaccines have been so effective why do we need so many
more to protect ourselves from new scourges? Why are allergies and
systemic diseases skyrocketing instead of disappearing? Why are
aggression and depression so common in everyday medical practice?

Is there an exaggeration in saying that more vaccines equals less
health? I don't think so. Why don't we live in a healthy world? Or
is that, as we are told, just a matter of time? A goal soon within
reach if we all cooperate? Are there just a few more problems to
solve, and are they working hard at solving them?

The presumption made in this kind of thinking is that there is only a
limited number of infectious diseases. Once we defeated the last bad
bug, our troubles are over. This thinking, of course, is more than
naive. One has got to be blind and stupid to believe anything of the
kind. Nature is a lot more inventive than that and we will never
wipe out diseases from this world.

The question is how to live with them without being affected too
much, not how to annihilate diseases or disease as such. There is no
reason to be afraid of disease, only of its complications. To
prevent complications, there is only one alternative: Health.

Health is not the absence of disease; it is the ability to deal with
disease in an effective way. As a matter of fact, many of the
bacteria and viruses modern medicine fights so vigorously are needed
to keep the biological balance at our surface: Our skin and our
respiratory and intestinal mucosa.

I have always said that private interests were hidden behind official
vaccination policy making. I was wrong. It is not hidden, it
happens in the open. The powers concerned do not even feel the need
to be secret about it. They feel so almighty they can publicize
their malicious intentions in official reports without
any significant opposition to it.

The vaccination lobby shamelessly takes all the children of this
world as hostages to still their greed for money and power. They
relentlessly abuse our compassion for the weaker and our concern
about health to promote their giga-business.

No matter what. No matter how many more vaccine victims will suffer
death or side-effects. No matter how many financial resources this
strategy devours at the expense of essential social investments like
housing and employment. No matter what. Shocking. There is no
excuse for this crime.

Just as shocking is the observation that (health) policy is no longer
under local, democratic control. Everything is set up and organized
with scrutiny at the highest, international level by those who take
profit from it: The pharmaceutical industry, the financial world and
politicians.

Through their many channels they put the entire scientific world,
together with policy makers, under such pressure that there is no
escape. At the same time the medical professionals as well as the
general public are brainwashed with all the means of the modern
'industry of conscience: Press, television, radio, the
Internet.

This way our concern goes beyond global health care. Democracy
itself appears to be more virtual than real when it comes to
important matters and the real difference between totalitarian
regimes and the 'free world' appears to be more a matter of subtlety
than of strategy.

When it comes to power and money, respect and dignity do not exist.

In a TV interview, an Italian politician once said that the essence
of mafia activity is not the use of violence, but the inherent
infiltration of private interests in political decision making.

Let us not underestimate the powers that support the global
vaccination strategy. I don't believe that the anti-vaccination
movement is to any degree a match for them as to influence and
striking power. All we have is our compassion, our anger, our
integrity and the knowledge that we are right. Damn right. There is
no way to stop the vaccination train as long as so much money is
involved.

The only alternative I can perceive is to convince the bankers of
this world that there is an alternative, namely a shift to
non-specific Immune system support. So far there has been very
little research in this field, although some firms are interested.
Let us hope they see that opportunity and use it wisely, without
screwing it up the way they have been screwing up our health with
vaccines for the past 200 years.