10 death row inmates challenge electric chair use in Tennessee

A judge has allowed 10 death row inmates to challenge the use of the electric chair in a lawsuit against the state of Tennessee. The prisoners were already suing the state over its use of lethal injections in executions.

The group is suing Tennessee over how it conducts executions,
with inmates claiming the state's methods violate state and
federal laws.

The inmates filed their original lawsuit over a state law that
allows correction officials to use one drug instead of three when
administering lethal injections.

Since supplies of such drugs are difficult to obtain, the state
passed another law this year that allows the Department of
Corrections to use the electric chair as a back-up method.

The plaintiffs filed papers in August, asking the court to amend
the lawsuit to include the new law. On Thursday, the judge agreed
it could be added to the case, according to the Guardian.

The ten inmates already claimed in their original lawsuit that
lethal injections violate state and federal constitutional laws
of “evolving standards of decency.”

In the papers filed last month, they said they electric chair is
inadequate because electrocution does not necessarily cause
instantaneous death.

“A prisoner that remains alive, conscious, and sensate for
some period of time during an electrocution execution will
experience excruciating pain and suffering,” the amended
lawsuit says, according to NBC.

The lawsuit comes as stories of botched executions have been
surfacing across the US. In three cases this year, inmates in
Arizona, Oklahoma, and Ohio all seemed to suffer during their
deaths.

The latest case was in July, when it took Arizona death row
inmate Joseph R. Wood nearly two hours to die after being given a
lethal injection. Witnesses said he repeatedly gasped and snorted
while being given 15 doses of the drugs.

Lethal injection drugs are becoming increasingly hard to find in
the US following the European Union’s implementation of a “ban on trade in
instruments of torture” in 2006, which prohibits the export
or import of drugs which are to be used for executions.

Since the law passed, US correctional departments have either run
low on supplies or had trouble finding them. Consequently, they
have been experimenting with the protocol, resulting in some
controversial and disturbing cases.