What do you know — despite the enthusiastic support of the liberal establishment, having pairs of perverts play parent may not be all that beneficial for the children involved. Lies supporting this crime against nature are crumbling, as the journal Social Science Researchadmits in a review and a new study:

The review by Dr. Loren Marks from Louisiana State University finds that much of the science that forms the basis for the highly regarded 2005 official brief on same-sex parenting by the American Psychological Association (APA) (http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/parenting-full.pdf) does not stand up to scrutiny. The new study by University of Texas sociologist and professor Mark Regnerus, provides compelling new evidence that numerous differences in social and emotional well-being do exist between young adults raised by women who have had a lesbian relationship and those who have grown up in a nuclear family.

Dr. Marks reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2005 cited by the 2005 official APA brief which asserted that: “Not a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents.”

To reach this absurd but politically correct conclusion, moonbat establishmentarians had to rely on flawed studies.

Of the 59 studies referenced in the APA brief, more than three-quarters were based on small, non-representative, non-random samples that did not include any minority individuals or families; nearly half lacked a heterosexual comparison group; and few examined outcomes that extend beyond childhood such as intergenerational poverty, educational attainment, and criminality, which are a key focus of studies on children of divorce, remarriage, and cohabitation. In other words, “A lack of high quality data leaves the most significant questions unaddressed and unanswered,” concludes Marks.

Professor Regnerus conducted a proper study:

According to his findings, children of mothers who have had same-sex relationships were significantly different as young adults on 25 of the 40 (63%) outcome measures, compared with those who spent their entire childhood with both their married, biological parents. For example, they reported significantly lower levels of income, more receipt of public welfare, lower levels of employment, poorer mental and physical health, poorer relationship quality with current partner, and higher levels of smoking and criminality.

If they really want to know how being used as a prop in a same-sex “marriage” might affect innocent children, they should ask the little boys Frank Lombard and his homosexual partner adopted, molested, and shopped around to other perverts.

lower levels of income, more receipt of public welfare, lower levels of employment, poorer mental and physical health, poorer relationship quality with current partner, and higher levels of smoking and criminality.

You mean to say, “a Democrat”.

J

If you look even at the “studies” done by homosexuality promoters, they reveal that the homosexual population generally suffers from depression, dysfunctional relationships, and many other mental and frequently physical illnesses. (they of course flip the cause and effect and blame it on “discrimination”)

The reason being is that, homosexual behavior (like any other deviant sexual behavior), modifies and destroys proper brain functions, resulting in nearly constant confused, distressed, angered and dazed state of mind.

jazbo

“You mean to say, “a Democrat”.”

Ding! another tribe on the Democrat Voter Plantation.

Sinister66

“lower levels of income, more receipt of public welfare, lower levels of employment, poorer mental and physical health, poorer relationship quality with current partner, and higher levels of smoking and criminality.”

Is this refering to the queers or the racial minorities?

Judith M.

So this is where Democrats come from…

762×51

The outcomes cited in the study are secondary to the reality of homosexuality. In recent years, proponents of that lifestyle have postulated the argument that they are born gay, that the condition is genetic. I subscribe to that theory though not for the reasons they want us to believe.

If gays are truly “born that way” it is because nature has selected their genetic lineage for extinction. In each case the gene line dies with them and by definition cannot be passed on to succeeding generations. The alleged gay gene cannot be passed from generation to generation like true genetic traits as gays do no procreate, at least until now where artificial insemination is available. That aside, the last thousand generations of humans have not had AI available yet homosexuality exists. The homosexual population among us, 2 -3 % of the total, are the snail darters of humanity and libs always try and stop natural selection from taking place. They fail miserably of course since 99% of all species that have every existed on Earth are now extinct. Still, like the man said, stupid is as stupid does and you can’t fix stupid.

Doug

Well, duh.

Just like at little pink lao.

Clingtomyguns

762×51 says:
June 11, 2012 at 10:46 am

They fail miserably of course since 99% of all species that have every existed on Earth are now extinct.

I beg to differ. We know that homosexual sodomites have existed since early Biblical times. Based on your hypothesis the genetic lineage would have died out centuries ago, but instead, they are seeming to flourish, especially more recently in America with the concentrated effort by queer activists and their sympathizers to advance militant queer agenda and destroy and pervert normal marriage and the family unit. The way they “reproduce” is to sexually abuse the next generation or take advantage of them through indoctrination supported by the politically correct to repress normal feelings of sexuality or develop and encourage queer feelings. It is purely despicable and Satanic work. This is why there is an all out effort for gays to infiltrate schools and organizations where youths can be influenced, and the call for “tolerance” by the media and pop culture to blur the distinction between what is moral and natural (attraction to opposite sex) and acceptance and even elevated status for those who practice the abominable crimes against nature (homosexuality, pedophilia, bestiality, etc.). Case in point below, the poor boys who went to this “Christian” camp and were abused by this homosexual will never be the same and will need a lifetime of counseling. Missouri is likely one of the few sane places where sodomy is still a crime.

FORSYTH, Mo. – A counselor fired from a Christian summer camp last summer has been charged with sexually abusing several campers — charges that come less than two years after another former counselor was sent to prison for life for sexually abusing children at the camp.

Lee Bradberry, 22, of Auburn, Ala., was arrested Monday after three campers, ages 9, 10 and 12, reported he sexually abused them. He was charged Friday in Taney County with two counts of statutory sodomy, two counts of child molestation, one count of sexual misconduct and one count of attempted sodomy, all felonies, The Springfield News-Leader reported

Homosexuality is not genetic. I’ve searched high and low for the latest (and all available) research. There is no homosexual gene. Even APA grudgingly admitted it.

It is a lifestyle choice. That is exactly why they are wanting to adopt children (besides other more disgusting reasons) – to twist and pervert them.

JNN

Eventhough this isn’t a surprise, it’s good to see it out in the public domain. Its fun to watch the moonbats flip out.

Mattius Maximus

DUH!!!

RKae

Take if from an old man: the “gay is genetic” thing is just a tactic.

You see, when I was young it was “Gay is a lifestyle choice, and how can you hate someone for making a choice in a free country?” Well, that didn’t work, so like Yosemite Sam running off to get a different weapon, they switched overnight to “Gay is genetic, and how can you hate me for the way I’m made?”

It’s a tactic that they will abandon once they get what the full public approval that they need. They’ll get rid of the “genetic” B.S. when it’s time to sell their notion to kids “Try being gay! It’s fun!” It will then revert back to being a lifestyle choice.

StanInTexas

RKae, I disagree. The “Genetic Gay” thing will end when they claim to have discovered the Gay Gene, and parents begin to demand tests for it so that they can about their potentially gay children.

This will also be the ONLY case where Liberals may allow a restriction on abortion.

J

P.S.:

Dave, is right on another thing. A study in IL 1997-2002 revealed that about 34% of child molestation cases, committed by foster parents, were homosexual in nature. Considering that gays are a fraction of US population and only a fraction of that fraction adopts, this number is disproportionally high.

Was listening to talk radio the other day & forgot which program it was. Anyway, they ran a pol/survey on “Are you Gay” and “What percentage of the population do you think is Gay” Actual percentage on “Are you Gay”: 2.8%. Actual percentage on “What percentage of the population do you think is Gay”…..I can’t remember the exact perception percentage, but I do remember that the female participants thought that 25% of the population was Gay. This supports that a VERY small percentage of the U.S. population is ACTUALLY Gay, a good portion of females aren’t in touch with reality, and the mainstream media/television is doing a superb sales job on the American public……especially women.

J

@70Stage

yikes, so if that actual (2.8%) number is correct, then it means that based on the study I quoted above (at least in Il) proportion of gay foster families molesting adopted children is nearly 12 times as higher as that of a general population.

Spartan24

It’s pretty obvious that any kid who lives in an environment outside of a two parent biological nuclear family usually has problems. Unless there is abuse or some other real problem with one of the parents in which case kids are better off without being abused. The key here is “biological family” it is far and away more likely that kids will be either physically abused or molested in a step parent situation than if the biological father is involved. In a very fluid gay relationship situation where partners may come an go I can see where kids would get a very warped idea with what a relationship is supposed to be about. A common nickname among lesbians is “u-haul lesbian” which is a woman who moves in with a new love interest almost as soon as they meet. Imagine a child being brought into this situation, he or she could possibly see his parent(s) go through several relationships over the course of his childhood. Granted kids with heterosexual parents often do end up with step parents situations but not in the volume that kids with homosexual parents do.

RKae

Spartan24:

Keep in mind: for the last few decades, the leftist/socialist agenda has been dedicated to getting heterosexual marriages to fall down to the same level as “u-haul lesbians” and gay men who want every night to be like a party at Freddy Mercury’s house.

If you bring up the fact that gay relationships last as long as dairy products, they’ll gleefully tell you that heterosexual marriages are now just as disposable.

Gee, thanks, lefties! You’ve dragged everybody down to the same rotten level.

Of course, you can come up with a million studies that show homosexual households being detrimental to children and it will make no damned difference at all. In the ’60s we had an endless parade of evidence to show how bad divorce was, but everyone shrugged it off and said, “Whatever! The heck with the kids! They’ll adjust… somehow. Let’s loosen up divorce!”

762×51

Clingtomyguns says:
June 11, 2012 at 11:41 am

762×51 says:
June 11, 2012 at 10:46 am

They fail miserably of course since 99% of all species that have every existed on Earth are now extinct.

I beg to differ. We know that homosexual sodomites have existed since early Biblical times. Based on your hypothesis the genetic lineage would have died out centuries ago, but instead, they are seeming to flourish, especially more recently in America with the concentrated effort by queer activists and their sympathizers to advance militant queer agenda and destroy and pervert normal marriage and the family unit.

Cling, you missed my point. There can be no genetic “lineage” passed from generation to generation since homosexuals, by definition do not procreate. My point was that any genetic connection has to be on of natural selection since each homosexual represents the end of their genetic line AI not withstanding. No gene is “passed” per se, rather some genetic force acts to end the line by stopping procreation of the line with that individual.

I think there’s a strong environmental factor in the development of most homosexuals. Nearly every homosexual I’ve ever known had a screwed up relationship with his or her parents from the start and a very high percentage were molested as minors. Ellen DeGeneres, Chaz Bono, Rosie O’Donnell are high profile cases in point.