ĐĎŕĄąá > ţ˙ Ţ ŕ ţ˙˙˙ Ü Ý ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ěĽÁ M řż
¤ bjbjâ=â= 2 W W Ă F ˙˙ ˙˙ ˙˙ l 2\ 2\ 2\ 8 j\ L ś\ L ăq > ^  _ ´_ ´_ ´_ @a Xa da bq dq dq dq dq dq dq $ !s Au Ü q la @a @a la la q Đk ´_ ´_  q Đk Đk Đk la ö ´_ ´_ bq Đk la bq Đk  Đk bq bq ´_ ^ ÖiŞSÂ W 2\ bf n bq bq łq 0 ăq bq v Đk v bq Đk Ů Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
c/o Dr. John C. Alden, M.D. at:
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
tel: (510) 452-2020
fax: (510) 832-8507
In Propria Persona
All Rights Reserved
without Prejudice
United States Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit
Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) Appeal No. 02-15269
)
Plaintiff/Appellant, ) AUTHORS SECOND VERIFIED
) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
v. )
) 4 U.S.C. 101;
AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al., ) 18 U.S.C. 242;
) 28 U.S.C. §§ 1652, 1746;
Defendants/Appellees.) Article VI, Clause 3,
) U.S. Constitution;
) §§ 6067, 6126, 6127,
) California Business and
_______________________________) Professions Code.
COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Appellant in the above entitled case, Citizen of California, Private Attorney General and Federal Witness, to provide formal notice to all interested parties, and to request mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court, of this, the AUTHORS SECOND VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT charging the following named individuals with the corresponding criminal violations enumerated infra.
Appellant hereby formally charges:
Daniel Scott Schecter with:
commission of a misdemeanor by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor and/or contempt of court by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count); and,
commission of a misdemeanor by depriving Appellant of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of America, as required by Article VI, Section 3, and by 4 U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count).
Belinda S. Lee with:
commission of a misdemeanor by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor and/or contempt of court by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count); and,
commission of a misdemeanor by depriving Appellant of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of America, as required by Article VI, Section 3, and by 4 U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count).
W. Warren H. Binford with:
commission of a misdemeanor by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor and/or contempt of court by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count); and,
commission of a misdemeanor by depriving Appellant of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of America, as required by Article VI, Section 3, and by 4 U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count).
D. Peter Harvey with:
commission of a misdemeanor by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor and/or contempt of court by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count); and,
commission of a misdemeanor by depriving Appellant of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of America, as required by Article VI, Section 3, and by 4 U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count).
Ranjitsinh Mahida with:
commission of a misdemeanor by the unauthorized practice of law and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6126 of same (one count);
commission of a misdemeanor and/or contempt of court by assuming to be an officer or attorney of this Court, by acting as such without authority, and by failing to produce the Certificate of Oath required to be indorsed upon a license to practice law by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, in violation of Section 6127 of same (one count); and,
commission of a misdemeanor by depriving Appellant of His fundamental Right to judicial officers who are bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution for the United States of America, as required by Article VI, Section 3, and by 4 U.S.C. 101, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242 (one count).
INCORPORATION OF EVIDENCE
Appellant hereby incorporates by reference all documents attached hereto, as if set forth fully herein, including a true and correct copy of the NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE, the NOTICE OF DEFAULT BY AFFIDAVIT, and the MIRANDA WARNING as mailed by Appellant to each of the above named individuals at the mailing locations shown in same.
Appellant also incorporates by reference the AUTHORS VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, executed on November 30, 2001 A.D. and served on December 4, 2001 A.D., as if set forth fully here. See Docket #99.
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE
Appellant now testifies that the evidentiary documents incorporated supra are true and correct, and they do constitute probable cause to charge the above named individuals with the corresponding criminal violations enumerated supra.
LIST OF AUTHORITIES
Appellant cites the following authorities in support of His SECOND VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, to wit: U.S. v. High Country Broadcasting Co., 3 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1993) (entry of default judgment was appropriate when unlicensed corporate president attempted to represent his corporation in court); Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (attorneys are officers of the court); Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir. 1993) (All attorneys, as officers of the court ....); Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section II.); Let Us Be Officers of the Court, by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997); and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (as officers of the court, attorneys share ....).
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Appellant in the above entitled action, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1746.html" 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: September 4, 2002 A.D.
Signed:
___________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Sui Juris
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of HYPERLINK "..\\sanmarco\\complain.htm" \l "one-of" ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):
AUTHORS SECOND VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
4 U.S.C. 101; 18 U.S.C. 242; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1652, 1746;
Article VI, Clause 3, U.S. Constitution;
§§ 6067, 6126, 6127,
California Business and Professions Code
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:
Judge Alex Kozinski Clerk of Court (5x)
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Attention: Cathy Catterson
P.O. Box 91510 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Pasadena 91109-1510 P.O. Box 193939
CALIFORNIA, USA San Francisco 94119-3939
CALIFORNIA, USA
Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley DeForest & Koscelnik
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oath)
1001 Marshall Street 3000 Koppers Building
Redwood City 94063 436 Seventh Avenue
CALIFORNIA, USA Pittsburgh 15219
PENNSYLVANIA, USA
Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP Pillsbury Winthrop LLP
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oaths)
P.O. Box 1319 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento 95812-1319 Sacramento 95814-4419
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver
Kraemer & Sloan, LLP & Hedges, LLP
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oaths)
727 Sansome Street 201 Sansome Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco 94111 San Francisco 94104
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Office of the General Counsel Paul Southworth
(failed to exhibit oaths) 2018 N. New Hampshire Ave.
University of California Los Angeles 90027
1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor CALIFORNIA, USA
Oakland 94607-5200
CALIFORNIA, USA
Karl Kleinpaste Ram Samudrala
P.O. Box 1551 UW Micro Box 357242
Beaver Falls 15010 Seattle 98195-7242
PENNSYLVANIA, USA WASHINGTON STATE, USA
Laskin & Guenard Rivkin Radler, LLP
(failed to exhibit oath) (failed to exhibit oaths)
1810 South Street 1330 N. Dutton Ave., #200
Sacramento 95814 Santa Rosa 95401-4646
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP Office of Solicitor General
(failed to exhibit oaths) 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
3 Embarcadero Center, Ste. 1060 Room 5614
San Francisco 94111 Washington 20530-0001
CALIFORNIA, USA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA
Register of Copyrights Steinhart & Falconer LLP
Library of Congress (failed to exhibit oaths)
101 Independence Avenue, S.E. 333 Market Street, 32nd Floor
Washington 20559-6000 San Francisco 94105-2150
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Matheny Sears Linkert & Long LLP Latham & Watkins
(failed to exhibit oaths) (failed to exhibit oaths)
P.O. Box 13711 633 West Fifth St., Ste. 4000
Sacramento 95853-4711 Los Angeles 90071-2007
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California State Bar of California
180 Howard Street 1149 South Hill Street
San Francisco 94105-1639 Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
[Please see USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]
Dated: September ___, 2002 A.D.
Signed:
__________________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Appellant In Propria Persona
Via First Class U.S. Mail
(out of necessity)
May 15, 2002 A.D.
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE
Mr. Daniel Scott Schecter
Latham & Watkins
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles 90071
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Sections 6002, 6067 and 6126,
California Business and Professions Code
Greetings Mr. Schecter:
I specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of the State Bar of California. See Section 6002 supra.
NOTICE
Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:
Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability. A certificate of oath shall be indorsed upon his license.
[bold emphasis added]
DEMAND
Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a certified copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 31, 2002 A.D. (ten+ (10) days hence).
Failure to perform will give Me probable cause to charge you with violating Section 6126 of the California Business and Professions Code (a misdemeanor). See also 4 U.S.C. 101 in pari materia with the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties).
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
DCUS Sacramento #CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Ninth Circuit appeal #02-15269
U.S. Mail:
c/o Forwarding Agent at:
40960 California Oaks Road, Box 281
Murrieta 92562
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
BY AFFIDAVIT
TO: Mr. Daniel Scott Schecter
Latham & Watkins
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles 90071-2007
CALIFORNIA, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
DATE: June 8, 2002 A.D.
SUBJECT: NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE,
May 15, 2002 A.D.
Greetings Mr. Schecter:
On May 15, 2002 A.D., I transmitted to you, via first class U.S. Mail, My formal NOTICE AND DEMAND that you deliver to Me a certified copy of the certificate of oath required by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, and that you do so no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 31, 2002 A.D.
As of that reasonable deadline, I have not received said certified copy, from you or from any one or anything else.
Accordingly, you are now in default.
VERIFICATION
The Undersigned hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: June 8, 2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff
U.S. Mail:
c/o Forwarding Agent
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
June 8, 2002 A.D.
Mr. Daniel Scott Schecter
Latham & Watkins
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles 90071
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Miranda Warning
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Dear Mr. Schecter:
MIRANDA WARNING
Pursuant to the holdings of the U.S. Supreme Court in Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892), McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 (1924), George Smith v. U.S., 337 U.S. 137 (1949), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), formal NOTICE is hereby given to you that you have the Right to remain silent, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "5th-amend" Fifth Amendment; you have the Right to assistance of Counsel, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "6th-amend" Sixth Amendment; and, any thing which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\rsrc\\dcus.htm" District Court of the United States supra. See HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/18/3231.html" 18 U.S.C. 3231 (DCUS). Statutes conferring original jurisdiction must be strictly construed [cites omitted here].
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Notice to agents is notice to principals.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))
c/o Forwarding Agent
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
Via First Class U.S. Mail
(out of necessity)
May 15, 2002 A.D.
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE
Ms. Belinda S. Lee
Latham & Watkins
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles 90071
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Sections 6002, 6067 and 6126,
California Business and Professions Code
Greetings Ms. Lee:
I specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of the State Bar of California. See Section 6002 supra.
NOTICE
Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:
Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability. A certificate of oath shall be indorsed upon his license.
[bold emphasis added]
DEMAND
Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a certified copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 31, 2002 A.D. (ten+ (10) days hence).
Failure to perform will give Me probable cause to charge you with violating Section 6126 of the California Business and Professions Code (a misdemeanor). See also 4 U.S.C. 101 in pari materia with the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties).
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
DCUS Sacramento #CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Ninth Circuit appeal #02-15269
U.S. Mail:
c/o Forwarding Agent at:
40960 California Oaks Road, Box 281
Murrieta 92562
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
BY AFFIDAVIT
TO: Ms. Belinda S. Lee
Latham & Watkins
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles 90071-2007
CALIFORNIA, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
DATE: June 8, 2002 A.D.
SUBJECT: NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE,
May 15, 2002 A.D.
Greetings Ms. Lee:
On May 15, 2002 A.D., I transmitted to you, via first class U.S. Mail, My formal NOTICE AND DEMAND that you deliver to Me a certified copy of the certificate of oath required by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, and that you do so no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 31, 2002 A.D.
As of that reasonable deadline, I have not received said certified copy, from you or from any one or anything else.
Accordingly, you are now in default.
VERIFICATION
The Undersigned hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: June 8, 2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff
U.S. Mail:
c/o Forwarding Agent
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
June 8, 2002 A.D.
Ms. Belinda S. Lee
Latham & Watkins
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles 90071
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Miranda Warning
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Dear Ms. Lee:
MIRANDA WARNING
Pursuant to the holdings of the U.S. Supreme Court in Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892), McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 (1924), George Smith v. U.S., 337 U.S. 137 (1949), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), formal NOTICE is hereby given to you that you have the Right to remain silent, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "5th-amend" Fifth Amendment; you have the Right to assistance of Counsel, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "6th-amend" Sixth Amendment; and, any thing which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\rsrc\\dcus.htm" District Court of the United States supra. See HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/18/3231.html" 18 U.S.C. 3231 (DCUS). Statutes conferring original jurisdiction must be strictly construed [cites omitted here].
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Notice to agents is notice to principals.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))
c/o Forwarding Agent
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
Via first class U.S. Mail
July 22, 2002 A.D.
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE
Mr. W. Warren H. Binford
Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento 95814-4419
CALIFORNIA, USA
fax: (916) 441-3583
Subject: Sections 6002, 6067 and 6126,
California Business and Professions Code
Greetings Mr. Binford,
I specifically deny that you are a member, in good standing, of the State Bar of California. See Section 6002 supra.
NOTICE
Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:
Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability. A certificate of oath shall be indorsed upon his license.
[bold emphasis added]
DEMAND
Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a certified copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location shown below, care of My Forwarding Agent, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 2, 2002 A.D. (ten (10) days hence).
Failure to perform will give Me probable cause to charge you with violating Section 6126 of the California Business and Professions Code (a misdemeanor). See also 4 U.S.C. 101 in pari materia with the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties).
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Ninth Circuit appeal #02-15269
U.S. Mail:
c/o 350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
BY AFFIDAVIT
TO: Mr. W. Warren H. Binford
Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento 95814-4419
CALIFORNIA, USA
fax: (916) 441-3583
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff/Appellant
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
DCUS No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Ninth Circuit appeal #02-15269
DATE: September 1, 2002 A.D.
SUBJECT: NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE,
July 22, 2002 A.D.
Greetings Mr. Binford:
On July 22, 2002 A.D., I transmitted to you, via first class U.S. Mail, My formal NOTICE AND DEMAND that you deliver to My Forwarding Agent a certified copy of the certificate of oath required by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, and that you do so no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 2, 2002 A.D.
As of that reasonable deadline, we have received absolutely no communication(s) from you in this regard.
Accordingly, you are now in default.
VERIFICATION
The Undersigned hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: September 1, 2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff
U.S. Mail:
c/o Dr. John C. Alden, M.D. and Eyewitness
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
September 1, 2002 A.D.
Mr. W. Warren H. Binford
Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento 95814-4419
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Miranda Warning, Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner et al.
Dear Mr. Binford:
MIRANDA WARNING
Pursuant to the holdings of the U.S. Supreme Court in Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892), McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 (1924), George Smith v. U.S., 337 U.S. 137 (1949), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), formal NOTICE is hereby given to you that you have the Right to remain silent, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "5th-amend" Fifth Amendment; you have the Right to assistance of Counsel, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "6th-amend" Sixth Amendment; and, any thing which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\rsrc\\dcus.htm" District Court of the United States supra. See HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/18/3231.html" 18 U.S.C. 3231 (DCUS). Statutes conferring original jurisdiction must be strictly construed [cites omitted here].
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Notice to agents is notice to principals.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))
c/o Dr. John C. Alden, M.D., Eyewitness
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
Via First Class U.S. Mail
(out of necessity)
February 11, 2002 A.D.
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE
D. Peter Harvey
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1060
San Francisco 94111
CALIFORNIA, USA
tel: (415) 391-7112
fax: (415) 391-7124
Subject: Sections 6002, 6067 and 6126,
California Business and Professions Code
Greetings Mr. Harvey:
I specifically deny that you are a member, in good standing, of the State Bar of California. See Section 6002 supra.
NOTICE
Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:
Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability. A certificate of oath shall be indorsed upon his license.
[bold emphasis added]
DEMAND
Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a certified copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 1, 2002 A.D. (ten+ (10) days hence).
Failure to perform will give Me probable cause to charge you with violating Section 6126 of the California Business and Professions Code (a misdemeanor). See also 4 U.S.C. 101 in pari materia with the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties).
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
DCUS Sacramento #CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS
U.S. Mail:
c/o General Delivery
Phillipsville 95559-9999
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
BY AFFIDAVIT
TO: D. Peter Harvey
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1060
San Francisco 94111
CALIFORNIA, USA
tel: (415) 391-7112
fax: (415) 391-7124
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
DATE: March 19, 2002 A.D.
SUBJECT: NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE,
February 11, 2002 A.D.
Greetings Mr. Harvey:
On February 11, 2002 A.D., I transmitted to you, via first class U.S. Mail, My formal NOTICE AND DEMAND that you deliver to Me a certified copy of the certificate of oath required by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, and that you do so no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 1, 2002 A.D.
As of that reasonable deadline, I have not received said certified copy, from you or from any one or anything else.
Accordingly, you are now in default.
VERIFICATION
The Undersigned hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: March 19, 2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff
U.S. Mail:
c/o P.O. Box 370
Sunset Beach 90742
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
June 8, 2002 A.D.
D. Peter Harvey
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1060
San Francisco 94111
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Miranda Warning
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Dear Mr. Harvey:
MIRANDA WARNING
Pursuant to the holdings of the U.S. Supreme Court in Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892), McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 (1924), George Smith v. U.S., 337 U.S. 137 (1949), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), formal NOTICE is hereby given to you that you have the Right to remain silent, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "5th-amend" Fifth Amendment; you have the Right to assistance of Counsel, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "6th-amend" Sixth Amendment; and, any thing which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\rsrc\\dcus.htm" District Court of the United States supra. See HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/18/3231.html" 18 U.S.C. 3231 (DCUS). Statutes conferring original jurisdiction must be strictly construed [cites omitted here].
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Notice to agents is notice to principals.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))
c/o Forwarding Agent
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
Via First Class U.S. Mail
(out of necessity)
February 11, 2002 A.D.
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE
Ranjitsinh Mahida
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1060
San Francisco 94111
CALIFORNIA, USA
tel: (415) 391-7112
fax: (415) 391-7124
Subject: Sections 6002, 6067 and 6126,
California Business and Professions Code
Greetings Mr. Mahida:
I specifically deny that you are a member, in good standing, of the State Bar of California. See Section 6002 supra.
NOTICE
Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:
Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability. A certificate of oath shall be indorsed upon his license.
[bold emphasis added]
DEMAND
Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a certified copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 1, 2002 A.D. (ten+ (10) days hence).
Failure to perform will give Me probable cause to charge you with violating Section 6126 of the California Business and Professions Code (a misdemeanor). See also 4 U.S.C. 101 in pari materia with the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties).
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff,
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
DCUS Sacramento #CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS
U.S. Mail:
c/o General Delivery
Phillipsville 95559-9999
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
BY AFFIDAVIT
TO: Ranjitsinh Mahida
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1060
San Francisco 94111
CALIFORNIA, USA
tel: (415) 391-7112
fax: (415) 391-7124
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
DATE: March 19, 2002 A.D.
SUBJECT: NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE,
February 11, 2002 A.D.
Greetings Mr. Mahida:
On February 11, 2002 A.D., I transmitted to you, via first class U.S. Mail, My formal NOTICE AND DEMAND that you deliver to Me a certified copy of the certificate of oath required by Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code, and that you do so no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 1, 2002 A.D.
As of that reasonable deadline, I have not received said certified copy, from you or from any one or anything else.
Accordingly, you are now in default.
VERIFICATION
The Undersigned hereby verifies, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United States (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: March 19, 2002 A.D.
Signed: /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Author, Damaged Party and Plaintiff
U.S. Mail:
c/o P.O. Box 370
Sunset Beach 90742
CALIFORNIA, USA
copy: State Bar of California
180 Howard Street
San Francisco 94105-1639
CALIFORNIA, USA
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles 90015-2299
CALIFORNIA, USA
Clerk of Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco 94102-3600
CALIFORNIA, USA
June 8, 2002 A.D.
Ranjitsinh Mahida
Harvey Siskind Jacobs LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1060
San Francisco 94111
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Miranda Warning
Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.
Case No. #CIV S 01-1480 WBS DAD PS
Dear Mr. Mahida:
MIRANDA WARNING
Pursuant to the holdings of the U.S. Supreme Court in Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892), McCarthy v. Arndstein, 266 U.S. 34, 40 (1924), George Smith v. U.S., 337 U.S. 137 (1949), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), formal NOTICE is hereby given to you that you have the Right to remain silent, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "5th-amend" Fifth Amendment; you have the Right to assistance of Counsel, under the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\ref\\whuscons\\whuscons.htm" \l "6th-amend" Sixth Amendment; and, any thing which you say, or do, from this point forward, can and will be held against you in the HYPERLINK "..\\..\\rsrc\\dcus.htm" District Court of the United States supra. See HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/18/3231.html" 18 U.S.C. 3231 (DCUS). Statutes conferring original jurisdiction must be strictly construed [cites omitted here].
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Notice to agents is notice to principals.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))
c/o Forwarding Agent
350  30th Street, Suite 444
Oakland 94609-3426
CALIFORNIA, USA
Authors Second Verified Criminal Complaint: Page PAGE 5 of 33
H J C K  ¨ Ę Ý ă ý / 0 F O   + - Ż 9 ž é I N s  š   ˛ ś ć F K ä é ë h i   ­ *! .! ?! h! }! ! ! ˇ! š! Ů! î! ř! " 1" 3" " " ě" # B# K# ł# Ë# Ú# ç# úňúëúäúÜúÜŐÎúÜúňúÇúÇú ÄžÄ¸Äú úňúňú úňúňú ú äúëúÜúäúÜúäúëúÜúäúëúäúÜúňúÜúÜ
6PJ ]
5PJ \ PJ
B*^J ph B*\ph 5B*ph 5B*\ph >*B*ph B*H*ph 6B*]ph B*ph H @ ] p    Š Ş ˝ ž Ň ä ĺ ć L m ¨ Ţ ˙ 0 a  ý ý ý ý ý ý ý ý ý ű ő ý ý ý ő đ ý đ ý ý ý ý ý ý ý ý ý ý $a$
Ć Đ ĂŁ ¤ ýý  Ô @ z Ž Ż ° P s  Ź
­
! " L
M
b
~  ó ô ý ý ý ý ý ř ě ě ę á Ô Ë Ô Ë Ô á á Ô Ĺ Ô Ë Ô 7$ 8$ H$ $7$ 8$ H$ a$
$Đ7$ 8$ H$ ^Đa$ dŕ 7$ 8$ H$ $dŕ 7$ 8$ H$ a$ dŕ : V W Ë Ě ö ÷
) *   É â ţ ˙ s t   š ó ć Ý ć Ý ć ó ó ć × ć Ý ć ó ć × ć Ý ć ó Ő Ĺ $Đdŕ 7$ 8$ H$ `Đa$ 7$ 8$ H$ $7$ 8$ H$ a$
$Đ7$ 8$ H$ ^Đa$ $dŕ 7$ 8$ H$ a$ ĺ ć ë # # )# ö$ ÷$ % % "% W% % % ' ' ď ă á ď á ď ă Ţ Ň É Ä ź ˇ ˛ ˛ Ş   $
Ć Đ dŕ a$
Ć Đ ¤ $a$ dđ $dŕ a$ dŕ
Ć Đ dŕ $Đdŕ `Đa$ 1$ $dŕ 7$ 8$ H$ a$ $Đdŕ 7$ 8$ H$ `Đa$ ç# Ł$ ¤$ á$ â$ đ$ ń$ % % % % % % ˇ% Ŕ% &