Although I haven't really been around for years now, I've recently found myself with ideas floating around my head and I figured, since I was ALSO having a lot of moments of boredom, I should write them down for the foundation. I've kinda lost track of what goes on around here (although I've been observing from afar), so I'm not sure whether these ideas are overly close to existing SCPs or even good enough for the current standards:

This is where redacting in the procedures feel weird. How would the personnel know the limit of the volume?

The status of the [DATA EXPUNGED] Superfund sites is to be maintained until and unless SCP-XX can be properly contained.

In general, there should be no redactions, expungements or blackboxing in the procedures. They are like instructions to be followed, so their inclusion should not be lost to censors.

unaffected psychologically

Should be "psychologically unaffected"

In summary, this is a humming sound that causes cancer and something else. I feel that the censors here undermines the article, and leaves a relatively mundane article. Even with the censors put there, there is hardly enough buildup to get the effect of readers filling it in on themselves to a good effect.

It remains a mystery how SCP-XX-02 is capable of maintaining its anomalous molecular structure and exist in a universe where the laws of physics make it impossible.

I am finding fault with the wording here. Let me see if we can improve on it…

"It remains a mystery as to how SCP-XX-02 is capable of maintaining its anomalous molecular structure despite the chemical properties of oxygen prohibiting such a structure"

While the idea of anomalous chemicals is intriguing, not much is done with it. If it is only stable in the plastic of the teapot and air, how did the Foundation manage to run tests or electrolysis on it successfully if it can implode on almost anything? I also think it would be better to explore on the properties of a O2H, rather than just making it an anomalous chemical that explodes stuff because of lack of compatibility.

If it is only stable in the plastic of the teapot and air, how did the Foundation manage to run tests or electrolysis on it successfully if it can implode on almost anything?

It's not stable only in air, just very highly reactive and thus somewhat hard to keep in check. If people can manage to run tests on such chemicals as Azidoazides, who'll explode from exposure to infrared, sure the foundation would be able to run tests on this stuff.

But yeah, I get it. I pump out good basic concepts, but I've not quite got the twisted mind to take it into creepy territory.