good alternative for my 1 yr old to wear to playgroup when he's not wearing his converse!

4th Jan 2015

I don't think these are even worth the 6.50. The soles are so hard in comparison to other toddler shoes and provides little to no flexibility.

I'm not voting either way but thought I'd warn others about how hard the sole is. Definitely not suitable for first walker shoes.

4th Jan 2015

My 4 year old daughter has these in pink. Paid double this price but worth every penny. Still in great condition after months of wear and she loves wearing them.

Hot from me!

4th Jan 2015

bia316

Chav central!

Hush

4th Jan 2015

very cheap and bad for your kids feet.

4th Jan 2015

Mujibear

I don't think these are even worth the 6.50. The soles are so hard in … I don't think these are even worth the 6.50. The soles are so hard in comparison to other toddler shoes and provides little to no flexibility. I'm not voting either way but thought I'd warn others about how hard the sole is. Definitely not suitable for first walker shoes.

agreed, barefoot all the way.

4th Jan 2015

Comment

bia316

Chav central!

Please tell me how these are chav central?!?!

They aren't Reebok Classic's you muppet!

4th Jan 2015

Comment

4th Jan 2015

ch33sl3y

agreed, barefoot all the way.

Or flip flops

4th Jan 2015

Comment

bia316

Chav central!

How can an infant child be a chav. Sort yourself out

4th Jan 2015

Starting the chav look early, awesome.

Original Poster5th Jan 2015

Just to confirm I bought these in a size 6 for my son who has been walking for 4 months, he can't be barefoot outside. He also has Clarks shoes and wellies. I think it's healthy for his feet to be in different shaped shoes rather than the same ones. Ridiculous calling a baby a chav, ridiculous calling anyone a chav really - grow up and stop the name calling!