PAWLING CSD - Educator Evaluation Data

APPR is the term used to describe NY State's teacher and principal evaluation system. In the 2015-16 academic year, 606 districts, BOCES, and charter schools were operating under Education Law §3012-c with an approved Hardship Waiver; 122 districts and BOCES implemented APPR plans under Education Law §3012-d. Below are 2015-16 Education Law §3012-c APPR data for teachers and principals. Data has only been included for those districts, BOCES, and charter schools with an approved APPR plan for the 2015-16 school year under Education Law §3012-c, including both original and transition (as applicable) scores and ratings. Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating of Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, or Ineffective (HEDI). This rating is based on a single composite effectiveness score (ranging from 0-100 points) that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents (State Growth or Other Comparable Measures, Locally-Selected Measures, and Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness).

During the transition period (2015-16 through 2018-19), transition scores and HEDI ratings will be generated for teachers and principals whose HEDI scores are based, in whole or in part, on State assessments in grades 3-8 ELA or math (including where State-provided growth scores are used) or on State-provided growth scores on Regents examinations. During the 2015-16 school year, overall transition scores/ratings will be determined based upon the remaining subcomponents/categories of the APPR that are not based on the grade 3-8 ELA or math State assessments or a State provided growth score.

The figure below shows the percentage of educators in each original rating category for the three subcomponents and the Overall Composite score, as well as the percentage of educators in each transition rating category for the Transition Overall Composite Score12: Original Overall Composite Rating (first row), Original State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (second row), Original Locally-Selected Measures (third row), Original Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness (fourth row), and Transition Overall Composite Score (last row).

You can also view:

The "Purple Memo," a summary of the law and regulations requiring APPR under Education Law §3012-c

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

Original State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating (2014-15)

INEFFECTIVE

11%

DEVELOPING

77%

EFFECTIVE

6663%

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

3130%

TOTAL EDUCATORS: 105

Original Locally-Selected Measures Rating (2015-16)

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE

00%

DEVELOPING

00%

EFFECTIVE

9991%

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

109%

TOTAL EDUCATORS: 109

Original Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating (2015-16)

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE

00%

DEVELOPING

00%

EFFECTIVE

11%

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

10899%

TOTAL EDUCATORS: 109

Transition Overall Composite Rating (2015-16)

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents, excluding measures based on the grades 3-8 ELA/math State assessments and any State-provided growth scores. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE

00%

DEVELOPING

00%

EFFECTIVE

3556%

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

2844%

TOTAL EDUCATORS: 63

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Data Suppression Rules

State, county, BOCES, district, and school-level data are suppressed as follows:

If any single HEDI category has a cell total that equals the row total, the entire row of data is suppressed; and

If the row total is less than five, the entire row of data is suppressed.

Filtered State, county, BOCES, district, and school-level data are suppressed as follows:

If any cell is less than five, the cell is suppressed.

When there is suppression of a single cell, the next smallest cell(s) is suppressed until the total of the data in the suppressed cells adds up to at least five.

If any single HEDI category has a cell total that equals the row total, the entire row of data is suppressed.