Possibility of getting Parise???

I was thinking that having Parise on the left side of the most likely Richards/Gaborik line would be sick. With the current $15.9 million in cap space, and signing all of our FA exluding Prospal, Frolov, and maybe Eminger. If we then trade away Boyle to make some space, we can give an offer sheet to Parise, and besides, We dont really care about our relationship with the Devils so it does not matter. Any thoughts/Opinions???

I was thinking that having Parise on the left side of the most likely Richards/Gaborik line would be sick. With the current $15.9 million in cap space, and signing all of our FA exluding Prospal, Frolov, and maybe Eminger. If we then trade away Boyle to make some space, we can give an offer sheet to Parise, and besides, We dont really care about our relationship with the Devils so it does not matter. Any thoughts/Opinions???

It's not about OUR relationship with the Devils, it's about the Devils' relationship with us. THEY aren't going to trade Parise to us so that we can have an insane first line. Won't happen. Also, we can't offer sheet him, he is filed for arbitration... So your proposal makes no sense anymore.

I was thinking that having Parise on the left side of the most likely Richards/Gaborik line would be sick. With the current $15.9 million in cap space, and signing all of our FA exluding Prospal, Frolov, and maybe Eminger. If we then trade away Boyle to make some space, we can give an offer sheet to Parise, and besides, We dont really care about our relationship with the Devils so it does not matter. Any thoughts/Opinions???

It's not about the relationship with the devils. Offer sheeting a player gives you a bad rep around the entire league. Sather is not about to test those waters. Plus with the way this organization has been building sather is not about to lose multiple 1st round picks while at the same time gaining a bad rep around the league.

I think hes being sarcastic bro. He put the in the post below it... At least I hope he is.......

Yes. Sarcasm indeed. I thought the very premise of trading the pack line for Malkin and trading Staal, Girardi, and McD for Iginla would've been a sarcasm indicator, but I wasn't too sure, so I added the </sarcasm> after. Apparently that wasn't good enough either.

Yes. Sarcasm indeed. I thought the very premise of trading the pack line for Malkin and trading Staal, Girardi, and McD for Iginla would've been a sarcasm indicator, but I wasn't too sure, so I added the </sarcasm> after. Apparently that wasn't good enough either.

I apologize. The site is not loading the posts up right away, or at least I did not see that post with the sarcasm below it.