How the Sunlight Foundation and PolitiFact can make ALL political coverage better

Today’s 2010 Knight-Batten Symposium gave me visions of political debates and speeches transformed from exercises in sound-bitery and emotion into civic lessons and conversations.

It gave me visions of political news stories that provide context not just about the issue at hand, but also context about the people at hand.

(Also, it gave me the vapors. But mostly just visions.)

Here’s one vision:

On TV, political debates display a fact-check tally for each candidate (how many true, truthy, lying-liar, etc. statements each candidate has made). Fact-check details about a particular statement are displayed as soon as they’re available.

Instead, imagine if the debate screen looked like this (well, imagine a non-crappy-mockup version that looked vaguely like this):

Here’s another vision:

Online, any streamed speech, debate, or hearing displays a combination of fact-checking material, aggregated contextual material, real-time commentary and public reaction. Any story or video that mentions politicians displays some combination of:

Fact-checking details for that person’s recent statements (any of their statements and/or recent statements related to the story being viewed)

Campaign contributions to that person from individuals/organizations related to the story’s subject.

Sunlight’s executive director, Ellen Miller, announced in her acceptance speech that Sunlight Live will be open-sourced — so any and every news site should try to use it for national, state, and/or local political coverage. It seems that an open-source Sunlight Live could also be used by the networks for their TV coverage, but if not they should be able to come up with their own stripped-down versions.

Combining Sunlight Live with the PolitiFact approach would make live coverage of speeches, debates, and hearings infinitely more useful. Much of what’s said in these events has already been said elsewhere, so previous fact-check items could be pumped in in real time. New statements that can be preliminarily fact-checked in near-real-time could be displayed on-screen as soon as they’re checked. And a tally of the veracity of any speaker’s statements to that point would help viewers judge the debate on more than style points.

Now consider how the Sunlight Foundation’s and PolitiFact’s tools and/or approaches could improve online political coverage.

Sunlight offers a cool tool called Poligraft that parses a text story and automatically generates information on contributions and lobbying for the politicians and political groups mentioned. Poligraft has an API, so it seems that any news organization could use the tool to parse its own stories and add the Poligraft-generated information to a story’s page.

Sunlight has another awesome tool called Politiwidgets — 10 javascript widgets, each detailing various information about members of Congress, that anyone can embed on their site. There’s already an impressive array of info available in these widgets — contact info, voting record, top contributors, earmark info — with more on the way.

PolitiFact also offers embeddable widgets, which display Truth-O-Meter or Obameter rulings and link back to the full PolitiFact item. As PolitiFact’s national operation covers more and more politicians’ statements, and as the state PolitiFacts add state and local politicians to the growing fact-checking database, the widgets could become even more useful. At some point, there should be enough location- and person-specific items for PolitiFact to offer more granular widgets, for example a Truth-O-Meter widget for only Georgia’s governor or for only Florida’s senators.

All of these tools are great ways to add a particular kind of context to political stories. We often talk about context in terms of policy — for example, providing readers with more explainers about the health care system. This is very important and worthwhile, but it’s also important to provide context and details about the politicians who shape these policies.

Every news organization should think about incorporating the Sunlight Foundation and PolitiFact widgets and data into their political coverage. Every TV network should think about incorporating the organizations’ tools and approach into their coverage of live political events.

And the potential for better political coverage all around should give journalists and civic-minded people everywhere the vapors.

Disclosures and notes: My employer, Publish2, received a 2010 Knight-Batten Special Distinction award. I used to work at the St. Petersburg Times, which created and runs PolitiFact, and I wrote two PF items while I was there. In the CNN mockup: the background has been manipulated for mockup purposes; the fact check text is lifted from this PF item; and I chose names for truthiness levels that are an homage to but slightly different from PF’s to show that this can be done without licensing PF (though I think it would be great if all news organizations licensed PF).