Watch

Watching this resources will notify you when proposed changes or new versions are created so you can keep track of improvements that have been made.

Favorite

Favoriting this resource allows you to save it in the “My Resources” tab of your account. There, you can easily access this resource later when you’re ready to customize it or assign it to your students.

Relationship Between Linear and Rotational Quantitues

Share this content

The description of motion could be sometimes easier with angular quantities such as angular velocity, rotational inertia, torque, etc.

Learning Objective

Determine uniform circular motion from linear equations

Key Points

As we use mass, linear momentum, translational kineticenergy, and Newton's 2nd law to describe linear motion, we can describe a general rotational motion using corresponding scalar/vector/tensor quantities.

Angular and linear velocity have the following relationship: $\bf{v = \omega \times r}$.

As we use the equation of motion $F = ma$ to describe a linear motion, we can use its counterpart $\bf{\tau} = \frac{d\bf{L}}{dt} = \bf{r} \times \bf{F}$, to describe angular motion.
The descriptions are equivalent, and the choice can be made purely for the convenience of use.

Full Text

The description of circular motion is described better in terms of angular quantity than its linear counter part.
The reasons are easy to understand.
For example, consider the case of uniform circular motion.
Here, the velocity of particle is changing - though the motion is "uniform".
The two concepts do not go together.
The general connotation of the term "uniform" indicates "constant", but the velocity is actually changing all the time.

Each particle constituting the body executes a uniform circular motion about the fixed axis.
For the description of the motion, angular quantities are the better choice.

When we describe the uniform circular motion in terms of angular velocity, there is no contradiction.
The velocity (i.e. angular velocity) is indeed constant.
This is the first advantage of describing uniform circular motion in terms of angular velocity.

Second advantage is that angular velocity conveys the physical sense of the rotation of the particle as against linear velocity, which indicates translational motion.
Alternatively, angular description emphasizes the distinction between two types of motion (translational and rotational).

Relationship Between Linear and Angular Speed

For simplicity, let's consider a uniform circular motion.
For the length of the arc subtending angle " at the origin and "r" is the radius of the circle containing the position of the particle, we have $s=r\theta $.

Differentiating with respect to time, we have

$\frac{ds}{dt} = \frac{dr}{dt} \theta + r\frac{d\theta}{dt}$.

Because $\frac{dr}{dt} = 0$ for a uniform circular motion, we get $v = \omega r$.
Similarly, we also get $a = \alpha r$ where $a$ stands for linear acceleration, while $\alpha$ refers to angular acceleration (In a more general case, the relationship between angular and linear quantities are given as $\bf{v = \omega \times r}, ~~ \bf{a = \alpha \times r + \omega \times v}$.
)

As we use mass, linear momentum, translational kinetic energy, and Newton's 2nd law to describe linear motion, we can describe a general rotational motion using corresponding scalar/vector/tensor quantities:

For example, just as we use the equation of motion $F = ma$ to describe a linear motion, we can use its counterpart $\bf{\tau} = \frac{d\bf{L}}{dt} = \bf{r} \times \bf{F}$ to describe an angular motion.
The descriptions are equivalent, and the choice can be made purely for the convenience of use.