<quoted text>Well, well, well now this is too much. We have someone that can't spell, can't comprehend a post, and is only capable of name calling and cursing. Yep you're real smart. Your posts are so intelligent that I am just amazed. That's sarcasm! Do you know what that means? Try looking it up, you just might learn something.

<quoted text>No, what is sarcasm? Could you explain that to me?Never heard of it...this must be something you just made up. Isn't itSarcasm...you're just making stuff up now to confuse everyone...Ok Winston...how's Marlboro doing?

Winston Smith is a fictional character and the protagonist of George Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The character was employed by Orwell as an everyman in the setting of the novel, a "central eye ...[the reader] can readily identify with".Winston Smith works as a clerk in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line. This involves revising newspaper articles and doctoring photographs—mostly to remove "unpersons," people who have fallen foul of the party. Because of his proximity to the mechanics of rewriting history, Winston Smith nurses doubts about the Party and its monopoly on truth. Whenever Winston appears in front of a telescreen, he is referred to as "6079 Smith W".

Winston meets a young woman named Julia, a fellow member of the Outer Party who also bears resentment toward the party's ways; the two become lovers. Winston soon gets in touch with O'Brien, a member of the Inner Party whom Winston believes is secretly a member of The Brotherhood, a resistance organisation dedicated to overthrowing the Party's dictatorship. Believing they have met a kindred spirit, Winston and Julia join the Brotherhood.

However, O'Brien is really an agent of the Thought Police, who have had Winston under surveillance for seven years. Winston and Julia are soon captured. Winston remains defiant when he is captured, and endures for a while under several months of extreme torture at O'Brien's hands. His spirit finally breaks, however, when he is taken into Room 101 and confronted by his worst fear: being eaten alive by rats. Terrified, he renounces Julia and pledges his loyalty to the Party. His freedom is finally and completely stripped when he accepts the assertion 2 + 2 = 5, a phrase that has entered the lexicon to represent obedience to ideology over rational truth or fact. By the end of the novel, he has reached the point of mind that the Thought Police wanted him to be at: "He loved Big Brother". Beyond his total capitulation to the party Winston's fate is left unrevealed in the novel. As Winston realises he loves Big Brother he dreams of a public trial and an execution; however the novel itself ends with Winston, presumably still in the Chestnut Tree Café, contemplating the face of Big Brother.

Winston Smith is a fictional character and the protagonist of George Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The character was employed by Orwell as an everyman in the setting of the novel, a "central eye ...[the reader] can readily identify with".Winston Smith works as a clerk in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line. This involves revising newspaper articles and doctoring photographs—mostly to remove "unpersons," people who have fallen foul of the party. Because of his proximity to the mechanics of rewriting history, Winston Smith nurses doubts about the Party and its monopoly on truth. Whenever Winston appears in front of a telescreen, he is referred to as "6079 Smith W".Winston meets a young woman named Julia, a fellow member of the Outer Party who also bears resentment toward the party's ways; the two become lovers. Winston soon gets in touch with O'Brien, a member of the Inner Party whom Winston believes is secretly a member of The Brotherhood, a resistance organisation dedicated to overthrowing the Party's dictatorship. Believing they have met a kindred spirit, Winston and Julia join the Brotherhood.However, O'Brien is really an agent of the Thought Police, who have had Winston under surveillance for seven years. Winston and Julia are soon captured. Winston remains defiant when he is captured, and endures for a while under several months of extreme torture at O'Brien's hands. His spirit finally breaks, however, when he is taken into Room 101 and confronted by his worst fear: being eaten alive by rats. Terrified, he renounces Julia and pledges his loyalty to the Party. His freedom is finally and completely stripped when he accepts the assertion 2 + 2 = 5, a phrase that has entered the lexicon to represent obedience to ideology over rational truth or fact. By the end of the novel, he has reached the point of mind that the Thought Police wanted him to be at: "He loved Big Brother". Beyond his total capitulation to the party Winston's fate is left unrevealed in the novel. As Winston realises he loves Big Brother he dreams of a public trial and an execution; however the novel itself ends with Winston, presumably still in the Chestnut Tree Café, contemplating the face of Big Brother.

Thanks for giving Winston Smith's bio. I thought everyone knew about Winston Smith and the book 1984, written by George Orwell. Obviously Hector Fuentes is clueless.

<quoted text>Thanks for giving Winston Smith's bio. I thought everyone knew about Winston Smith and the book 1984, written by George Orwell. Obviously Hector Fuentes is clueless.

No, actually I never did read 1984 by George Orwell.

That was 28 years ago...it was actually fortelling the past...what an irony.

Irony...I guess you invented that literary concept too. Along with your keen obsevation of sarcasm you should have gone far in life....yet look at you..what a big waste of human flesh that you've turned out to be...all that education and still as ignorant as a human being could possibly be...what a waste.

So, where are all the flying cars....

But I will read 1984 though and I will do a critical analysis of it too...

But you're party is disintegrating before your eyes...it may be beyond hope.Your going tol have to find some runaway racist splinter group where you can find some like minded ittelectuals who would want to overthrow the government.

They'll catch up to you one day..don't worry. I just hope you don't have the opportunity to hurt someone other than yourself....

1984. Don't tell me how it ends...were they able to ever get flying cars?

<quoted text>No, actually I never did read 1984 by George Orwell.That was 28 years ago...it was actually fortelling the past...what an irony.Irony...I guess you invented that literary concept too. Along with your keen obsevation of sarcasm you should have gone far in life....yet look at you..what a big waste of human flesh that you've turned out to be...all that education and still as ignorant as a human being could possibly be...what a waste.So, where are all the flying cars....But I will read 1984 though and I will do a critical analysis of it too...But you're party is disintegrating before your eyes...it may be beyond hope.Your going tol have to find some runaway racist splinter group where you can find some like minded ittelectuals who would want to overthrow the government.They'll catch up to you one day..don't worry. I just hope you don't have the opportunity to hurt someone other than yourself....1984. Don't tell me how it ends...were they able to ever get flying cars?You are one dumb ass.hole...and that's a fact

Happy New Year to everybody except Winston Smith who claims to be a fictional charcter from the past....

If you want to educate yourself, I suggest you read George Orwell's 1984. You'd be surprised by the similiarities of the here and now of todays government.

Ever hear of Oliver Stone? Probably clueless on him too. He 's a well known Hollywood film maker that was a big Obama supporter. No more. He recently made the comment that Obama 's America has become Orwellian.

People lke you are too clueless to see what's happening.......until it's too late.

<quoted text>No, actually I never did read 1984 by George Orwell.That was 28 years ago...it was actually fortelling the past...what an irony.Irony...I guess you invented that literary concept too. Along with your keen obsevation of sarcasm you should have gone far in life....yet look at you..what a big waste of human flesh that you've turned out to be...all that education and still as ignorant as a human being could possibly be...what a waste.So, where are all the flying cars....But I will read 1984 though and I will do a critical analysis of it too...But you're party is disintegrating before your eyes...it may be beyond hope.Your going tol have to find some runaway racist splinter group where you can find some like minded ittelectuals who would want to overthrow the government.They'll catch up to you one day..don't worry. I just hope you don't have the opportunity to hurt someone other than yourself....1984. Don't tell me how it ends...were they able to ever get flying cars?You are one dumb ass.hole...and that's a fact

What are you babbling about it was 28 years ago? My gawd you are stupid! You really are clueless. No the book WAS NOT foretelling the past, it was foretelling the future you idiot!The book was written in 1947. It takes place in 1984! DUH!

Obviously you did not comprehend truth's post on the short bio of George Orwell's 1984. Not a surprise.

Your post is just more insight as to how little you know and what a fool you are making of yourself.

By the way, learn how to spell. It' s hard to take you serious when you can't even spell simple words. By the way 2+2=4, not 5?

<quoted text>If you want to educate yourself, I suggest you read George Orwell's 1984. You'd be surprised by the similiarities of the here and now of todays government.Ever hear of Oliver Stone? Probably clueless on him too. He 's a well known Hollywood film maker that was a big Obama supporter. No more. He recently made the comment that Obama 's America has become Orwellian.People lke you are too clueless to see what's happening.......until it's too late.Happy New Year To All and To All A Good Night

There you go again "cherry picking" a persons words...then taking them comletely out of context to support your fcked up, mentally handicapped, no no no retarded is the appropriate term here, ideology...

your not very smart and you a definately not nearly as smart as you think you are....and that's a fact ....loser boy....

But you're party is disintegrating before your eyes...it may be beyond hope.

Wrong again. You assume I am a Republican. I am not. I am an Independent. I'm in the party that the Dems and GOP ( that means Grand Old Party and they are Republicans ) are always trying to win over to their side. So you see, I'm quite popular....everyone wants me!

Wrong again lame brain....I was referring to the Whig PartyAren't you member of the Whig Party?Some people are comparing some independents to the Whigs too.They were real successful...weren't they?Are you sure you're not working for the Marisa's Clueless Detective Agency?Or as I like to call it........MCDA.Or in other words your Dave Rogers is starting to show...when you going to bring old Davey back huh? Did you retire him or did you just take him out back and shoot him?

Still displaying your stupidity.

The Republican party was founded by the Whigs, the abolisionists. Lincoln was their first candidate. The Independent party was founded in 1967 by Bill and Eileen Shearer. So tell me where did you get your information that the Whig party is similiar to the Independent party? Oh wait! I know where. You made it up or else you only half read something and took the wrong impression, you know what I mean...you have difficulty comprehending (that means understanding ) what you read.

Have you figured out the big goof you made on 1984? You know, where you said that was 28 years ago and the book is about the past not the future? That statement alone made you look like a moron. The book was written 62 years ago, not the 28 that you seem to think. One more thing, 1984 Is also considered a classic.

I really am becoming bored with you. You are not the sharpest tack in the box, in fact you are the dullest. In other words, you don't come off as very bright. I can have a more meaningful conversation with a 6 year old.

Wrong again lame brain....I was referring to the Whig PartyAren't you member of the Whig Party?Some people are comparing some independents to the Whigs too.They were real successful...weren't they?Are you sure you're not working for the Marisa's Clueless Detective Agency?Or as I like to call it........MCDA.Or in other words your Dave Rogers is starting to show...when you going to bring old Davey back huh? Did you retire him or did you just take him out back and shoothim?

I'm really getting to you aren't I? You know how I can tell? All you can do is call me names and curse, that's all you have....no response of intelligence. Let me TRY to educate you about the parties

Guess who has the majority of Americans registered in their party? Let me break it down in simple numbers for youIndenpendents....40%Democrats.....31%GOP..........27%

So tell me "genius", how is my party unsuccessful? I can hardly wait for your idiotic response to this., that is if you can even come up with one.

<quoted text>Still displaying your stupidity.The Republican party was founded by the Whigs, the abolisionists. Lincoln was their first candidate. The Independent party was founded in 1967 by Bill and Eileen Shearer. So tell me where did you get your information that the Whig party is similiar to the Independent party? Oh wait! I know where. You made it up or else you only half read something and took the wrong impression, you know what I mean...you have difficulty comprehending (that means understanding ) what you read.Have you figured out the big goof you made on 1984? You know, where you said that was 28 years ago and the book is about the past not the future? That statement alone made you look like a moron. The book was written 62 years ago, not the 28 that you seem to think. One more thing, 1984 Is also considered a classic.I really am becoming bored with you. You are not the sharpest tack in the box, in fact you are the dullest. In other words, you don't come off as very bright. I can have a more meaningful conversation with a 6 year old.

Oh man please do not respond to my posts...there's no chance of that but see if you can refrain...please im begging you to not respond

<quoted text>I'm really getting to you aren't I? You know how I can tell? All you can do is call me names and curse, that's all you have....no response of intelligence. Let me TRY to educate you about the partiesGuess who has the majority of Americans registered in their party? Let me break it down in simple numbers for youIndenpendents....40%Democrats.....31%GOP..........27%So tell me "genius", how is my party unsuccessful? I can hardly wait for your idiotic response to this., that is if you can even come up with one.

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.