No one is saying every piece of correspondence is included. In fact, the review would have looked a lot more credible if it was commissioned by the NCAA executive committee rather than Mark Emmert, but the results, at times, are entertaining.

As you know, the situation arose when the NCAA got "greedy" -- one source's opinion involved in the case -- when investigator Ameen Najjar decided pursuing South Florida attorney Maria Elena Perez to obtain information for the NCAA in depositions with witnesses the NCAA felt it could not otherwise reach.

Let's cut quickly to the funny on Jan. 27, 2012, when Elena Perez asks Najjar for the NCAA's UPS number in order to mail some documents. Remember, Perez eventually got $18,000 from the NCAA for her work after asking for a total of $57,000.

“We are no longer allowed to do that,” Najjar replied to Elena Perez.

Good to know there was strict adherence to company policy and proper oversight.

On to the rest of the email highlights:

• Early on, Elena Perez proposed an hourly rate of $575 for the NCAA.

“This does NOT work,” Najjar wrote.

Later, an invoice is submitted for 20-and-one-half hours of work at $250 per hour.

• An Oct. 10, 2011, an email from Najjar to NCAA enforcement director Julie Roe Lach and enforcement officer Tom Hosty is one of the earliest indications a relationship could be established with Elena Perez.

“We will be looking at roughly $20,000 in total costs,” Najjar wrote.

(Hosty is a 49-year-old NCAA veteran who, according to this bio, has processed more than 70 major cases. You can see that Hosty's father once investigated Lee Harvey Oswald.)

Anyone in need of a credential from all the BCS title games? Dennis Dodd has them. In three decades in the business, he's covered everything from the Olympics to Stanley Cup to conference realignment. Just get him on campus in a press box in the fall. His heart lies with college football.