(4) "Rodney S. Scott, chief patrol agent at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, condemned members of the Central American caravan and accused them of having..."

(5) "'Illegally entered the United States without immigration documents by climbing over the dilapidated scrap metal border fence on either side of the San Ysidro Port of Entry.'"

(6) "He lambasted the caravaners who are mothers for putting themselves and their children in peril to traverse 'illegally through a dark, treacherous canyon that is notorious for human and drug-smuggling.'"

(7) You're all getting explosive diarrhea for nothing.

I'm sick of having to talk sense into people.

It makes me hate Twitter.

(8) The caravan is backfiring, AND it's distraction from what Trump is doing in other places.

You people with explosive diarrhea are no different than Bill Krystol.

What you want is permanent failure.

(9) "Where are the troops? Send troops! I want troops or I'll squirt diarrhea on you!"

This content can be removed from Twitter at anytime, get a PDF archive by mail! This is a Premium feature, you will be asked to pay $30.00/year for a one year Premium membership with unlimited archiving.

Don't miss anything from @ThomasWictor, subscribe and get alerts when a new unroll is available!

It is dangerous, yes, for once I agree with Trump. But he's missing the point. The notable thing isn't the banned accounts. It's the change in algorithms that's made Twitter so much more pleasant recently.
uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa…

I'm sure everyone enjoys that as much as I do, and that it's very good for Twitter as a business decision. But to be able to change the user experience as much as they have in--what, maybe the past month?--is a truly spooky achievement in AI.

Here's an anodyne description of what they're doing:
engadget.com/2018/07/30/twi… And very successfully. For users, this is a much better product. But what's spooky about this is that their algorithms can now distinguish, very accurately, between "polite" and "impolite."

and I came up with an idea 💡 to make our threads and digs more appealing to others, another way we can spread truth across platforms in the hopes to awaken more people..The First thread we’re working on is the
#cemex#OperationBackyardBrawl#SaveTheChildren

Jordan Peterson’s functionalist account of hierarchy is so risible that not only do anthros & socs not believe it, but economists, political scientists & evolutionary biologists consider it basically conclusively disproved.

Boutique Boutique Shorts Eddie Boutique Eddie Shorts Eddie Bauer Shorts Bauer Bauer Let’s look at the evolutionary evidence first. Hierarchy depends at least minimally on a social structure, so only social animals can display it. But how common is it among animals? It varies but it’s less common than is normally realized.

First, hierarchies rarely develop where there is:
a. an abundance of resources—among hierarchies that do exist, conflict occurs rarely under abundance or
b. free movement—absent some sort of enclosure, animals just leave hierarchies. This is incredibly common.

0/ A lot of people naturally draw the conclusion that crypto will challenge legitimacy of governments, that governments won't stand for it, and that governments will shut down crypto by any means necessary

Well, it's about time for governments to show us what they've got

1/ In private settings, I've been saying for a while that this would happen. And now it's finally here