Sorry, was replying to Mender, that quote must have been attached to my post from a previous reply or something.
I just want the rules applied clearly and consistently. I'm not necessarily arguing for or against one way being better, just saying how I interpret what's there, even if it doesn't make sense. Hopefully it leads to the written rules being more in line with how the rules are applied (or common sense), which is better for everyone.

Obviously CCES dropped their event at BIR because they added Indy on the same weekend, so WRL took that date at BIR.
Lemons is also running BIR for the first time this year.
I doubt BIR will draw enough entries to support 3 races in a year, so we'll see if/when CCES comes back.
Looks like there are only a couple tracks left that have been on the schedule since the early days

A couple have run in WRL, including this one:
https://iaa-auctions.com/flood-to-track/
They haven't set the world on fire in GP2, which the front running Champcars would easily compete with.
13.2 gallons of fuel for 200+hp seems like a pretty big handicap anyway.

I read it all in one sitting, it actually stayed pretty close to the original topic IMO (two different camps on what's "safe enough" for kill switch wiring) Ray and Jay both made posts suggesting that tech would be done different going forward, but didn't say exactly what the difference was.
Good to know.
To be devil's advocate, if it's purely a functional requirement, why do we even need a kill switch if the stock ignition switch does the same thing? Because racecar?

Fine, if someone claims their reground cams, tech marks it in the logbook for less than 50 points, and it gets displayed at impound, I'll go through the process to get the rule changed. However, if people get the idea that this isn't any points so they don't need to claim it, then the stuff is gonna get real deep real fast.