Talking about the economy,
one member of our forum wrote: “The question is not how bad the
U.S.
economy has been under Bush, the question is how bad it could have been
otherwise. Greenspan was criticizing the 'irrational exuberance' of the
stock market in December, 1996. The dot-com bubble occurred on
Clinton
's watch. The corporate corruption that led to the accounting scandals and
the collapse of many major companies, e.g., Enron, also long predated
Bush's election. Al Qaida, not Bush, was responsible for the 9/11 attacks,
which were trained for and planned long before he took office. Over 5.85
trillion dollars was lost in the stock market burst and the resulting
accounting scandals, and the subsequent recession. 9/11 cost
New York City
95 billion dollars alone. Bush's pro-business stance and deep tax cuts
reassured business at a critical time, and gave confidence to investors.
We may have record deficits now, but they would have been twice as bad had
we gone into a deep recession or depression. Bush's invasions of
Afghanistan
and
Iraq
stimulated defense spending and boosted the defense-sector of the economy.
The recession was a very shallow one thanks to Bush and Greenspan. Blaming
Bush for "losing 2 million jobs" (or whatever the figure is) is
ludicrous. It could have easily been 8 million.”

My critics ask why I am so
passionate about this election when I am not even American. There is
nothing in it for me personally. In fact I alienate half of my readers and
that is not a very politically correct thing to do. The answer however is
obvious. On this election depends whether we will lose to Islamism or
not.

Sadly the leftists are
blindfolded. Their hatred of capitalism and
Americanism that this Texan President so characteristically embodies, has
obscured their vision to the extent that they are willing to side with the
Islamists, with the Iranian Mullahs and with Yasser Arafat just to get rid
of him. The dislike of the leftists, the liberals, the Democrats, the
socialists and the communists of Bush is so monumental that the British
newspaper columnist Charlie Brooker, of The
Guardian wrote:John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John
Hinckley Jr - where are you now that we need you? http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguide/columnists/story/0,,1333748,00.html

Those assassins, the beloved heroes of Charlie Brooker
are dead, but Osama Bin Laden and millions of Muslim terrorists are alive
and they are the hopes of Brookers and his ilk.

With the above expressed
wish, we can peer into the darkness of the wicked soul and the depravity
of the crooked mind of the leftists and understand the mystery behind their
adulterous love-affair with the Islamists. What they secretly covet is the
destruction of capitalism and the ‘evil’ Judeo-Christianity and they
are willing to sleep with anyone including the Islamists and the
terrorists to achieve their goal. We saw his happen in Iran in 1979 and
the deluded leftists are still banging their heads against the wall for
their own stupidity. Maybe other leftists and liberals should learn from
their Iranian counterparts that Muslims are not trustworthily
bedfellows.

This is not the kind of
secularism that I stand for. In my book no one becomes a demon because of
his religious or political affiliation. Evil is, who evil does, and not
for what he believes.

Politics, especially during
elections are always contentious and they arouse raw emotions. But
inciting people to assassinate a president is stepping out of the bounds.
The leftists have lost their legitimacy. They are not only siding with the
terrorists, but now they are inciting terrorism. This is not something
civilized people should tolerate. The Guardian should be reprimanded and
both the author and the editor of that article should be fired and
charged with conspiracy to assassinate a President.

When it comes to honor killing and the atrocities
committed by Muslims the leftists are silent. You never hear a squeak from
them to protest against the abuse of women in Islamic countries. They
condemn Israel for demolishing the houses of the terrorists but never they
blame the terrorists for murdering Israeli children. Those of them who are
in power in Europe and in Canada blissfully trade with the vilest and the
most murderous regimes on Earth, like the Iranian Mullahs and Saddam
(until he was deposed, which aggravated their grievance against America)
and now their American co-ideologists
want to follow the same misguided footsteps. As if all that were not
enough, they are even calling for the assassination of the President.

Someone wrote to me saying that one of his friends
who is a hardcore leftist and a mortal enemy of all religions, has told
him that America had no right to invade Afghanistan and to remove the
Taliban who were, as she put it, ‘the legitimate government’. She even
had the temerity to say that the Afghans were better off under Taliban
than they are today. This is what ideologies do to human brain. This
communist lady should remember the golden words of her pbuh Prophet Marx
who said “religion is the opium of the masses”. What he did not say is
that his own doctrine was also a religion.

The leftists have sunk to a level that is beyond
idiocy. A Persian maxim says: “A wise foe is better than a foolish
friend”. The main reason why the leftists should not be allowed in the
White House is because they are foolish.