5/25/04 I just received the order, so I'm adding the lawyer's last email, to which I haven't yet responded. These are in typical email reverse order, with the most recently received on the top.

After them will be the Order and Judgement.

5/21/04I find it interesting that the decision was, according to the judges' lawyer, done on the 19th, but I haven't received it yet...

And, the judge's secretary, or her assistant, but anyway, someone named Barbara at the judge's number, told me this morning that a copy to me was going out today...

5/25/04I did file the IRS case using the Taxable Income material from that fellow in Pennsylvania whose name I forget.

I did file the Nichols case.

The St. Vincent case I did not file with that court, I filed it in state court and the US attorney removed it to US Court.It was not a federally funded clinic, except in a few things, like a pap smear I got... so that was a bit fraudulent.

The Santa Fe case was also removed from state court. Because I was given an opportunity to amend in it, based on the fact that amendment is favored, I trusted I would be able to amend in this case, also.

But as far as I can tell, the Order doesn't even mention my several requests in my Objection to Motion, to amend.

Action for Justice - Pro Se

5/26/04

I am beginning to work on my Motion for Reconsideration and Leave to Amend

6/18/05To clarify, the lawyer was able to email me about the Order way before I received it because he would have received it nearly instantly by electronic transfer.