On tv this morning.. Obama is going around congress AGAIN .. He's gonna enact gun control without a vote.. He thinks he can become a dicktater!! Me thinks he will go around them again when his term is up and add years to the presidential term so we can enjoy more of this lameass..

Did you see the runaway ferry boat in new York that hit the dock this morning with 109 people really injured??? I think we need to ban ferry boats that's just stupid to ride them.. But after further review it was determined a democrat was in charge and all is forgiven!!! Go figure!!!

On tv this morning.. Obama is going around congress AGAIN .. He's gonna enact gun control without a vote.. He thinks he can become a dicktater!! Me thinks he will go around them again when his term is up and add years to the presidential term so we can enjoy more of this lameass..

1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."~Thomas Jefferson2. "Those who trade liberty for security have neither." ~ John Adams3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.8. Know guns, know peace, know safety.No guns, no peace, no safety.rdm9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.IF YOU AGREE, PASS THIS 'REFRESHER' ON TO TEN FREE CITIZENS."I love this country, it's the government I'm afraid of" More today than ever before.

When in the summer of 1941 Hitler decided not to concentrate his forces on Moscow and instead spread them out in a three/four pronged assault, he lost the war in Europe. Britain at the time was powerless to stop Germany..only the English Channel saved them from certain defeat.

When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and Hitler declared war on the US, it assured their defeat...along with Japan's.

Not trying to lessen the allies significance in Europe in any way, but Russia would have eventually defeated Hitler without our boots on the ground assistance....and instead of 60-70 million dead in Europe, maybe 100-150 million.

<quoted text>America should have taken notice of what happened to Russia before we went into the Middle East in the first place. There are two options as far as the Middle East goes. Nuke them and kill every living thing or save your money and stay out. You can't fight a "civilized" war trying to spare innocent civilians in the Middle East and expect to win.

To have never gone there in the first place. If we just had to get Sadam Hussein or whoever then we should have sent special ops for infiltration and assassination missions. Instead of being spread out all over the world we could have simply concentrated 95% of our efforts on protecting ourselves much in the same way we have since 911. The only reason I say this is because the Middle East is unlike any other region in the world. Their (terrorist) disreguard for the lives of their fellow citizens makes a war, where civilian casualties are not acceptable, completely impossible. I am suprised that we haven't lost more soldiers than we have fighting that kind of war for the past 11 years in that region. If the Middle East countries fought army vs. army I would have said we should have unleashed the arsenal on them because we would not have been over there for more than a month. That's not the way it is and we are worried about what a highly politically correct world will think of us.

Its a great day to be an American, just paid off the balance on our joint credit card that my wife and I used to buy Christmas presents for each other, our kids and our grandkids.

Congrats. If every Amreican were that responsible, we wouldn't be in the fianancial shape we are in. For that matter we wouldn't vote in politicians that didn't live the fiscally responsible lives we citizens live.

<quoted text>Congrats. If every Amreican were that responsible, we wouldn't be in the fianancial shape we are in. For that matter we wouldn't vote in politicians that didn't live the fiscally responsible lives we citizens live.

We are reaping what the British and French created after the First World War..and we stumbled into like blind men.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>If we just had to get Sadam Hussein or whoever then we should have sent special ops for infiltration and assassination missions.

Then he would have just been replaced by another madman within the Bath Party.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>Instead of being spread out all over the world we could have simply concentrated 95% of our efforts on protecting ourselves much in the same way we have since 911.

Just how would we "protect" ourselves without becoming involved in the Middle East? When we supported the Afghan freedom fighters and the Taliban against the Russians, we opened this can of worms.

When after the Russians left, we dropped the ball on Afghan recovery, we removed the top of the can of worms.

When we refused to aid the Muslim communities during the 1990's Serbo-Croatian ethnic cleansing campaign in the Balkans, we dumped those worms on our doorstep.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>The only reason I say this is because the Middle East is unlike any other region in the world. Their (terrorist) disreguard for the lives of their fellow citizens makes a war, where civilian casualties are not acceptable, completely impossible. I am suprised that we haven't lost more soldiers than we have fighting that kind of war for the past 11 years in that region.

I know, I've been there...and I think we have not lost as many soldiers over there due to the vast majority of everyday Muslim's support despite our best efforts to reverse what goodwill we have garnered.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>If the Middle East countries fought army vs. army I would have said we should have unleashed the arsenal on them because we would not have been over there for more than a month.

Then they would have been over here spreading terror forever.

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>That's not the way it is and we are worried about what a highly politically correct world will think of us.

And a ever growing Nuclear World..with profiteers supplying an ever growing number of Middle Eastern Jihadist weapons of mass destruction.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.