What does this mean for commercial space tourism? A majority of the companies listed above have suggested, if not openly stated, that they plan to develop passenger vehicles to serve markets beyond ferrying crews to and from ISS. Both Rocketplane and SpaceX have stated that they plan to develop their manned vehicles regardless of COTS; getting a COTS contract would simply accelerate the process. T/Space has talked about the market for space tourists using its CXV vehicle in past conference presentations, while SpaceDev is also looking beyond just ferrying astronauts. What’s less clear is what orbital tourism plans, if any, Andrews and SPACEHAB have: SPACEHAB makes no mention of passenger services in its press release while Andrews remains tight-lipped about its plans.

3 comments to COTS and space tourism

Jeff,
Another cool website! Keep up the good work.
While Andrew’s remains “tight-lipped” about their plans, their webpage, http://www.andrews-space.com/, has a interesting graphic of their full scale mock-up of a 5.4 meter capsule for delivering cargo to the ISS and up to 10 people to LEO. Ten people to LEO has possibilities for tourism. It will be interesting to see how many of these final six will be funded after negotiations.
Also, it looks like Andrews is missing from your Company links section.

One of the interesting points about those selected by NASA is every single one are people who promise capability D. I know of several companies that went for capability A&B only but none of those made the cut. It really shows that NASA is looking to see if the alt.space community can deliver on their words of humans to space. I hope they can.