I've had several people ask, so to answer the question, WHY are we advocating for Missouri voters to vote YES on amendment 2, NO on amendment 3, and NO on proposition C this November 6th, rather than just voting yes on all of the above:

ONLY ONE initiative will stand. There can be ONLY one winner and we want it to be the BEST option.

YES on Amendment 2
- Amendment 2 is patient friendly and doctor approved.
- It has strong, reasonable regulations.
- It is endorsed by a large amount of "regular people"- doctors, patients, lawyers, advocates, and political groups.
- It's taxes go to fund programs for helping veterans.
- It is well researched and written. 👍

NO on Amendment 3
- Highest taxes on medical marijuana in the country.
- Puts control in the hand of 1 man (personal injury lawyer, Brad Bradshaw) to determine who gets commercial licenses.
- Puts control in the hands of 1 man to determine qualifying conditions to be able to utilize medical marijuana)
- Basically puts control of all Missouri Medical Marijuana in the hands of Brad Bradshaw 👎

NO on Proposition C
- Proposition C differs from the others in that it is a statutory amendment, which means lawmakers can make changes to the language, qualifying conditions, and regulations at any time, totally changing what the voters actually voted for

This is exactly right and well put. Only thing I'd add on Amendment 2 is it's only a 4% tax on the purchase of the medical marijuana and is overseen by the Missouri Dept. of Health. Only other thing I would add on Amendment 3 is it also has an eminent domain clause. Basically, Bradshaw can pick anywhere in the state he wants too and I believe its for 29 acres to build his "Center to fight disease".

This is exactly right and well put. Only thing I'd add on Amendment 2 is it's only a 4% tax on the purchase of the medical marijuana and is overseen by the Missouri Dept. of Health. Only other thing I would add on Amendment 3 is it also has an eminent domain clause. Basically, Bradshaw can pick anywhere in the state he wants too and I believe its for 29 acres to build his "Center to fight disease".

As a general rule I vote down all amendments and all propositions. This post pertains to Colorado. but are amendments change the State Constitution and I just don't feel like it's something that should be changed frequently. the last amendment I think I voted for in Colorado was to legalize recreational marijuana. Most us old gummer's just need pain relief on our way to the bright light. we shouldn't be restricted to Pharmaceuticals to achieve that goal.

As a general rule I vote down all amendments and all propositions. Dispose pertains to Colorado. but are amendments change the State Constitution and I just don't feel like it's something that should be changed frequently. the last amendment I think I voted for in Colorado was to legalize recreational marijuana. Most us old gummer's just need pain relief on our way to the bright light. we shouldn't be restricted to Pharmaceuticals to achieve that goal.

Amendment 2 is best. Get a doctor's recommendation and grow your own. Amendment 3 is by some rich dude who wants to control all the weed and won't let you grow, while Prop C just directs the state legislature to maybe think about doing something worthwhile for once in their ****ing lives, which stands as much chance of working as rationally explaining to your cat why it shouldn't shit outside the litter box.

If all 3 pass, the one Amendment with the most votes wins, while the Prop is mooted.