Text Size

-

+

reset

“It’s embarrassing as hell. We’ve been through all of this with [2012 GOP presidential nominee] Mitt Romney. And we were very hard with Mitt Romney with the women binder and a variety of things,” Rangel said on MSNBC. “And I kind of think there’s no excuse with the second term.”

The Obama administration has been criticized recently for not having enough diversity with its Cabinet appointees after The New York Times ran a photo of Obama meeting with senior advisers in the Oval Office, the vast majority of them white men. The White House responded by releasing its own photo, which showed a much more diverse crowd of Obama’s top advisers.

“The president values diversity, believes it’s important, because it enhances the quality of the pool of potential nominees for positions across the administration,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said at briefing Tuesday. “He believes that by looking broadly for candidates for offices that [it] ups the chances he’ll find the very best person for the job.”

“If it’s the first term, you could see people got to know who is around that’s qualified in order to get this job, No. 1. I had thought, and maybe it’s so, that it could be the Harvard problem where people just know each other, trust each other and women and minorities don’t get a chance to rub elbows and their reputations and experience is not known,” Rangel said.

STOP IT already, I mean dayummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm like all President's, he (Obama) has a right to have a cabinet that he selects NOT you or me or some repuk. GET OVER yourself already, let him pick the persons he wants around people. WHY ON EARTH is it that because your a person of color you have let other people pick your cabinet memeber for you? BTW: have Rangel forgotten Susan Rice? GROW the ***k-up.

How can dems be so blind as to not even see their own hypocrisy about almost anything controversial these days. It's truly amazing...a real phenomenon!!!! I'm going to start referring to them as the Demo-hypes...a 'label' truly deserved.