You are using a new version of the IGI Global website.
If you experience a problem, submit a ticket to
helpdesk@igi-global.com,
and continue your work on the old website.

To Support Customers in Easily and Affordably Obtaining Titles in Electronic Format
IGI Global is Now Offering a 50% Discount on ALL E-Books and E-Journals Ordered Directly Through IGI Global’s Online BookstoreAdditionally, Enjoy a 20% Discount on all Other Products and FormatsBrowse Titles

As Part of Our Efforts to Assist Customers with More Easily and Affordably Obtaining Titles in Electronic Format, IGI Global is Now Offering a 50% Discount on All E-Books and E-Journals Ordered Through IGI Global’s Online Bookstore*

To support customers with accessing online resources, IGI Global is offering a 50% discount on all e-book and e-journals. This opportunity is ideal for librarian customers convert previously acquired print holdings to electronic format at a 50% discount.

*The 50% discount is offered for all e-books and e-journals purchased on IGI Global’s Online Bookstore. E-books and e-journals are hosted on IGI Global’s InfoSci® platform and available for PDF and/or ePUB download on a perpetual or subscription basis. This discount cannot be combined with any other discount or promotional offer. Offer expires June 30, 2020.

To assist you during the COVID-19 pandemic, IGI Global will convert libraries previously acquired print holdings to electronic formats directly through our InfoSci® platform, ProQuest’s E-Book Central, or EBSCOhost at a 50% discount. Send us a list of IGI Global publications you would like to convert, and we’ll promptly facilitate the set-up and access.

IGI Global offers a rich volume of content related to treatment, mitigation, and emergency and disaster preparedness surrounding epidemics and pandemics such as COVID-19. All of these titles are available in electronic format at a 50% discount making them ideal resources for online learning environments.

IGI Global is now offering a new collection of InfoSci-Knowledge Solutions databases, which allow institutions to affordably acquire a diverse, rich collection of peer-reviewed e-books and scholarly e-journals. Ideal for subject librarians, these databases span major subject areas including business, computer science, education, and social sciences.

Create a Free IGI Global Library Account to Receive an Additional 5% Discount on All Purchases

Exclusive benefits include one-click shopping, flexible payment options, free COUNTER 5 reports and MARC records, and a 5% discount on single all titles, as well as the award-winning InfoSci®-Databases.

Abstract

Existing literature propagates a variety of methods for assessment of intellectual capital (IC). This research argues that, due to complexities involved in selecting and customizing an appropriate method or combination of methods for assessing intellectual capital, mechanisms are needed for managing and applying the evolving body of knowledge concerning such assessment. The assumption of complexity is supported by the results obtained from a survey (employing a self-administered questionnaire as instrument for data collection). This research proceeds to develop a model, referred to as a conceptual design, for a system to (i) provide management support to the process of selecting and customizing an appropriate method (or combination of methods) for assessment of intellectual capital, (ii) utilize past knowledge and expertise to accelerate and improve decision-making, (iii) promote synergism through integration of methods, and (iv) manage the evolving body of knowledge concerning the assessment of IC.

Despite a rich and evolving body of literature on methods, model systems and frameworks for assessment of IC (Andriessen, 2004b; Bontis, 2001; Chen, Zhu & Xie, 2004; Green, 2005; Smith & McKeen, 2003) and an increased awareness of the need for such assessment, relatively few organizations are actively and comprehensively assessing their IC (Bontis, 2001; Green, 2005; Marr, 2006; Smith & McKeen, 2003). IC has surfaced as a major value contributor (Hope & Frazer, 1997) – estimated to account for up to 70% of the value of organizations (Sullivan, as cited in Green, 2005) – but still is not adequately reflected in current accounting practices (Green, 2005; Lev, Cañibano & Marr, 2005; Mouritson, Bukh & Marr, 2004).

This research argues that, due to the complexities involved in choosing (selecting and customizing) an appropriate method or combination of methods for assessment of IC, and the cognitive limits of human problem solving, there is a need for knowledge management support systems (KMSS) – management support systems (MSS) with knowledge components – to manage (organize, store and retrieve) the evolving knowledge concerning such assessment (see also Pretorius & Coetzee, 2005).

Note that the sensibility and usefulness of a KMSS for choosing IC assessment methods is dependent on judgment concerning the complexity of the process of choosing IC assessment methods. In this research, the assumption is made that the complexity of the decisions to be made in choosing an appropriate method (or combination of methods) for assessment of IC (given any particular context) warrants the development of a KMSS, as defined earlier. This assumption needs to be explored and tested as part of this research.

It is argued that:

•

It is not necessary to obtain an absolute and all-inclusive answer to the question of whether the complexities involved in choosing IC assessment methods warrant a KMSS to justify that the development of such a system makes sense.

•

For such a system to be potentially useful, it needs to be useful to some relevant decision makers (individuals making decisions related to the choosing of IC assessment methods) and not necessarily to all relevant decision makers.

Subsequently it is proposed that, if in the context of this research, a substantial portion of a suitable group of individuals knowledgeable on IC or aspects thereof perceive the decisions involved in choosing IC assessment methods as at least moderately complex (moderately or very complex) it is likely that:

•

There is a need for such a system; and

•

It makes sense to develop such a system – at least in a scientific sense – but even also in a business sense.

Accordingly, the fundamental question addressed in this research is phrased as: