Mayflowa: Sexkillz!!! The competition is not fair for the girls in group 2(middle group). Those girls are way finer than chillaz. The Wild chick with the smallest vote there is finer than chillaz.

I found myself voting for Chillaz in that first group because the she beats the other girls in her group not the girls in group 2 and 3. like putting Brazil, argentina, france and Italy in the same group in football world cup and now put kenyan, iran, Nigeria and Saudi arabia in another group. Its so unfair.

LocalChamp: Christian Militants In Southern Kaduna Threaten Fulani Herdsmen, Give Seven Days Evacuation NoticePosted: June 5, 2012 - 03:28Posted by siteadminBy Saharareporters, New York A militant Christian sect that first emerged last year in Christian-dominated Southern Kaduna again, today threatened to chase out Fulani herdsmen if they do not leave the area in the next seven days.

The group, known as AKHWAT AKWOP, said in an email to SaharaReporters through their spokesman, Bukarma Leguma, that it has “watched with disgust the unrelenting murders and killing of peaceful, innocent, and hardworking people by wandering bands of Fulani terrorist gunmen operating in southern Kaduna,” and urged the herdsmen to leave the area.

“AKHWAT AKWOP is also aware that the ultimate aim of the Fulani terrorist is to create a situation of insecurity in southern Kaduna whereby our people will not be able to utilize this farming season thereby leading to hunger, deprivation and famine in the land,” the statement said. It warned that after the seven days of grace, which expires on June 10, AKHWAT AKWOP will declare “open season” on any Fulani found within their lands.

[Full text of the statement]:Below is the full statement:

Greetings in the name of our lord and savior Jesus Christ.

AKHWAT AKWOP has watched with disgust the unrelenting murders and killing of our peaceful, innocent, and hardworking people by wandering bands of Fulani terrorist gunmen operating in southern Kaduna.

Between January and June 2012, the Fulani terrorist have murdered over 100 innocent southern Kaduna people, the recent one at zonkwa claimed a father and son leaving others injured .

AKHWAT AKWOP is also aware that the ultimate aim of the Fulani terrorist is to create a situation of insecurity in southern Kaduna whereby our people will not be able to utilize this farming season thereby leading to hunger, deprivation and famine in the land

Rising from our national executive committee and field commander’s emergency meeting AKHWAT AKWOP resolves as follows

1. For so long we have restrained ourselves from reprisal attacks against these Fulani dogs from hell. We can and will no longer do so

2. Today 3/6/12 AKHWAT AKWOP gives all Fulani within southern Kaduna 7 days to leave. After these 7 days of grace which expires on 10/6/12 AKHWAT AKWOP declares open season on any Fulani found within our lands.

3. AKHWAT AKWOP assures all our peace loving and hardworking people of their safety in their homes, villages, highways and on their farms.

4. AKHWAT AKWOP reminds all that eternal vigilance in Christ Jesus is the price we pay for our freedom.

Another Islamic sect named Jama’atuAnsarul Musilimina fi Biladi Sudan hasemerged, The new sect headed by aman that goes by the pseudonym AbuUsamatul Ansar has pledged to defendthe interest of Islam and Muslims in Africa. The new sect, in a video it posted, saidthat it did not believe in killinginnocent non-muslims except “in self-defence or if they attack Muslims likethe cases we have in Jos.” The Ansar group said it doesn’tbelieve in killing innocent securityoperatives except if they are attackedby them or in self-defence. The name Jamaatul Ansarul Musliminafi Biladin Sudan means, “the groupthat dedicates itself to helping Muslimsin Africa”. In the exclusive video which wasmade in Arabic and translated inHausa and English, Usamatul Ansar’sspeech clearly indicated that theirunderstanding of Jihad in Islam isdifferent from any other group that claims to be engaged in Jiliad for thesake of Allah. He said the Jamaatu Ansarul Musliminafi Biladi Sudan considers anybody thataccepted the khalimatush shahada(believing in one God and ProphetMuhammad PBUH as the messenger ofAllah) as a Muslim who must not be killed except he/she has committed anact that is punishable by death asstated in the holy Qur’ran. “Islamforbids killing of innocent peopleincluding non-Muslims. This is ourbelief and we stand for it,” Ansar said. Ansar said they will not target or killany security personnel in the name ofJihad but that they will protect theinterest of Muslims and Islamanywhere in Africa and that theyexpect the government to allow them to freely practice their religion and toalways do justice to the people. He said recent attacks on Muslims inJos and Kaduna during the Eld-el fitrprayer and in the aftermath of thepresidential election violence wasunacceptable to them. He emphasisedthat the holy Prophet Muhammad had lived with non-Muslims and even Jewsbut on the condition that they wouldnot do anything to harm them directlyor indirectly. But Ansar said they will attack anygroup or religion that attacks Islamand Muslims. He said the rampantmassacre of Muslims in Nigeria will nolonger be tolerated and that they willnever attack any religion or government institution that didn’tattack them and their religion.www.leadership.ng/nga/articles/26363/2012/06/03/new_group_emerges_vows_avenge_killing_muslims.html

When Helen and Jay Stassen’s 21-year-old son, Benjamin, committedsuicide 19 months ago, he did notleave a note. If it had been 20 years ago, theStassens might have looked throughdiaries, letters or other personal itemsin an attempt to find clues as to whyhe decided to end his life. These days,however, young people tend not to keep things on paper; instead, theirmost intimate thoughts are likely to beonline – in emails, social media postsand personal blogs.So that’s where the Stassens wentsearching. They found themselvesengaged in a conflict with Facebookand Google as they hunted foranswers about their son’s death andthe companies sought to honor their contracts with their users. “We are reeling with the reality ofbeing parents who not only have ourson who has died, but a very difficultdeath on top of it which is notanything we ever saw coming, whichhas added to our desire to really want to know why,” said Helen Stassenfrom her home in Prescott, Wis. The Stassens say that Benjamin, acollege student, had hoped to be anentrepreneur one day and was ahealth food enthusiast who loved toplay the drums and practice yoga. Tokeep his memory alive, they built a free library at a park near their homeand their extended family helped get abench named for him near theMississippi River. “Those have been experiences thathave helped and have healed in tinyways that are a contrast to the fightthat we’ve been in,” Helen Stassensaid. The Stassen family is one of agrowing number of familiesbattling online companies to gainaccess to a deceased loved one’sdigital assets. Digital assets include email, socialmedia accounts, digital photosand online banking accounts andrecords. The Stassens thinkBenjamin’s online life mightprovide a clue into their son’s last days and as the heirs of his estate,they feel they have a right to getaccess to his accounts. “Social media is a major way 21-year-olds interact these days,” Jay Stassensaid. “We thought maybe this couldbring us some understanding, maybesome peace. We didn’t know, but wefelt it was important to try to understand.” A local judge recently granted thefamily a court order directingFacebook to give the Stassen familyaccess to their son’s account. Thecourt order says that the Stassens arethe heirs to their son’s estate and are entitled to any of his assets,possessions or records, including thecontents of his Facebook account. Emails provided by the family showthat Facebook has received the courtorder and it’s currently in their legaldepartment. Legally, Facebook canappeal the court order or comply withit. When asked about the Stassen family’s court order, a Facebookspokesperson said that the companydoes not comment on specific cases. Legal experts said that court orderscan trump user agreements. Onlinecompanies’ user agreements arecontracts with the user that usuallyguarantee privacy and prohibit or limitaccount access to others beside the user. “If Facebook is doing business in ajurisdiction and the court orders themto do something, they pretty muchhave to do it or face the penalty. Ifthey don’t follow a court order, theycan be held in contempt of court,” said Peter Swire, a law professor at OhioState University. Swire, who served as Chief Counselorfor Privacy in President Bill Clinton’sadministration and as an adviser toPresident Barack Obama on privacyissues, said that online companies facea “patchwork of state laws” and are usually cautious when it comes togranting access to a deceased user’saccount. What happens to your Facebook account when you die? “What happens if a 21-year-old had asafe deposit box at the bank, theanswer is the safe deposit boxbelongs to his estate and whoevercontrols the estate gets to open thebox,” Swire said. “In the physical world, it’s easy to tell if it’s someone’sparents or child who has the safedeposit key, it’s trickier for Facebookand Google. Some evil prankstermight pretend that a person is deadand try to take control of the account, so the online companies areunderstandably careful before theyturn over the account to someonewho says they run the estate.” Online companies such as Facebooksay they are concerned with honoringtheir contracts with users whichrequire them to protect their users’privacy. It is possible that a deceaseduser may not have intended for his online accounts to be accessed by hisloved ones after he died. “I think it’s a good idea for sites not tohave a blanket policy to hand this stuffover to survivors. This information isprivate and you assume that it’sprivate, you assume that yourFacebook account is private, you assume that your email account isprivate,” said Rebecca Jeschke of theElectronic Frontier Foundation, a digitalcivil liberties group. Jeschke said that the problem is thatpeople often don’t know what theirdeceased loved one’s wanted tohappen to their online accounts. “What's really important is that yoursurvivors know what it is that youwant, to say to your spouse andparents, ‘No, you can't read my emailafter I die or yes, I want you to.’ I don'tthink I'm the only person that would be uncomfortable with the idea ofsomeone reading my email after Ipass,” Jeschke said. Naomi Cahn,a law professor at GeorgeWashington University, said that thereis “almost no binding legal precedentout there” when it comes to digitalassets. “It’s a concern of internet serviceproviders being caught betweenprivacy and the meaning of theircontracts and being faced with a courtorder to which there could be quitesevere penalties if they don’t comply with it. It’s something that lawyers,state legislatures, hopefully the federalgovernment, hopefully the internetservice providers are all starting tothink more about as these issuesbecome common,” Cahn said. Are digital assets part of your estate? Cahn said that current laws have yet tocatch up with the digital age, leavingfamilies like the Stassens in afrustrating limbo. “When somebody dies, the personwho is responsible for taking care ofthe individual’s asset is supposed tobe complying with what the individualwanted and protecting the individual,”Cahn said. “Because so many people have not thought about this, we don’tknow what the person actuallywanted...we can all imagine what’s ininternet accounts. There may certainlybe cases where the person who diedwould not have wanted anyone to get anywhere near the person’s account.” Only five states currently have estatelaws that include digital assets --Connecticut, Rhode Island, Oklahoma,Indiana and Idaho – and the laws varyamong them. Some states’ statutes, forinstance, just relate to email, with only Oklahoma and Idaho clearly includingsocial networking and blogging aspart of an estate. “Legally it is unclear exactly what youcan do in the 45 states -- andWashington, D.C. -- that do not havethese laws that address this situation,”Cahn said. “Even in those states wherethere are laws, we’re still in the process of testing how those lawsoperate. They don’t cover all Internetaccounts and the laws are newenough that they’re just in the processof being worked out.” Cahn said that most people don’t thinkabout what will happen to their onlineaccounts when they die, but if theydid, they would likely feel differentlyabout different sorts of onlineaccounts. “Some of the ones that we expect tobe passed on, like getting access toonline bank account statements,doing online bill paying, thoseprobably we would expect others tobe able to take control over. Many of us probably think that once we die,our Facebook accounts should eitherbe memorialized [left up for onlyfriends to see] or deleted entirely,”Cahn said. Internet companies such as Google,Yahoo and Facebook have taken theposition that the user probablyintended for the contents of his or heraccount to remain private and crafteduser agreements to reflect this, Cahn said. “They do assume that the user wantsprivacy, there’s all kinds of advice onpasswords and password strength tomake sure that there’ s nounauthorized use,” Cahn said. “One ofthe reasons we have passwords on our accounts, one of the reasons weget so outraged when there’s ahacking is we have certainexpectations of privacy when weopen accounts.” There also are liability issues. Somestates prohibit internet companiesfrom disclosing information withoutthe permission of the customer. Withno clear definition of digital assets inmost states, the companies then look to their user agreements and the lawsof individual states when a user dies. “Right now it’s kind of the Wild West inmost states. The statutes don’t refer toany kind of digital asset or account,”said attorney Suzanne Walsh, whospecializes in wills and estates. Walsh is a commissioner to theUniform Law Commission and chairs acommittee that’s been formed toconsider drafting a uniform law ondigital assets that states could adopt. Gene Hennig, one of Minnesota’scommissioners to the Uniform LawCommission, said that a court order isone of the few options families have inobtaining access to a loved one’sonline account. “You’ve got to hire lawyers. It’s time-consuming. Some people may go toall that trouble and it took forever toget the order and by the time they gotit, the stuff had been destroyed. It’sjust an unworkable and very inefficient way of doing things,”Hennig said. Family fighting Facebook: ‘We’ll be patient, but persistent’ The Stassens, an attorney andlibrarian, are fortunate in that theirprofessional skills are there to helpthem navigate the terrain of digitalassets. In addition, they’ve connectedwith other families engaged in similar battles and lobbied their congressmanfor help. In the process, they’ve alsoobtained two court orders: onedirected at Google and another atFacebook. “Many people don’t have thatknowledge, don’t have thatexperience and unless they have thefinancial means to hire an attorney todo this for them, they are very likely tofeel stuck and not know what to do,” Jay Stassen said. After submitting a court order toGoogle in September of last year, theyreceived the contents of Benjamin’sGmail account, but they are stillworking to recover access toBenjamin’s Facebook account. In April, they obtained a court order directingFacebook to give them access toBenjamin’s account. “We’ll be patient, but persistent,” HelenStassen said. The Stassen family said that they planto keep private any information theyfind from their son’s online accounts. A spokesperson for Facebook saidthat their policies do not allow accessto a dead user’s account. “For privacy reasons, we do not allowothers to access a deceased user’saccount,” a Facebook spokespersontold NBC News. In addition, thespokesperson said, the company'spolicy prohibits them from commenting on the Stassen family'scase or any other specific cases. Facebook has two options for a deaduser’s account, the spokesperson said.The first allows an account to bememorialized, which leaves the profileup so that friends and family can leaveposts in remembrance, but restricts the profile and associated content to theFacebook "friends" that the deceasedhad while alive, the spokespersonsaid. A proof of death must beprovided for an account to bememorialized. In some instances, Facebook allows family members tohave an account deactivated. Other companies have differentpolicies regarding a deceasedperson’s online account. According toGoogle’s web site, in rare cases, theymay provide the content of a deceasedperson’s account to an authorized representative of the person.Meanwhile, Yahoo says on its site thatall accounts are non-transferable andit will delete an account when theyreceive a death certificate. The Stassen family, though, say theydon't want to memorialize ordeactivate their son’s Facebookaccount until they have seen the fullcontents. The only way they’ve beenable to see the public part of their son’s page is because he and hisbrother, Peter, were friends onFacebook. Benjamin’s Facebook profile shows asmiling young man with photosshowing him skiing with his familyand enjoying a beer with his brother,Peter. Peter Stassen said that it’s been astruggle to watch his parents try toobtain access to Benjamin’s account. “It’s hard to fully reconcile how I feelabout Facebook now,” said PeterStassen, Benjamin’s brother. “None ofthe people on the Facebook side seemto have any realization that my parentsare people, that they’re dealing with emotions and that they’re not just anaccount.” Facebook’s policy prohibits them fromcommenting on the Stassen family’scase or any other specific cases, thespokesperson said. “I think Facebook has to understandthat when they push sharing of data,open sharing of data, they also havean obligation not only to be fair withthe account owner during theirlifetime, they have an obligation to be fair with the account owner afterthey’ve died,” Jay Stassen said. How you can protect your digital assets The growing murkiness over digitalassets recently prompted the federalgovernment to post a blog encouraging people to create socialmedia wills. And Professor Cahn said that peopleshould discuss their online accountswith their loved ones and have a frankconversation about what they want toremain online, what they want to bedeleted and what they want their loved ones to have access to. “We’re in an era of uncertainty,” Cahnsaid. “You can certainly tell your lovedones what you want to have happen.What you have online that’s notprivate, you can set up a jointaccount.” Cahn said couples should considerjoint online bank accounts, forexample. In addition, she said, peoplecan include digital assets in their wills,but warns that wills eventuallybecome public documents and that if you list passwords on the will, thosewill become accessible to the public. A series of companies have alsosprouted up, such as Entrustet andLegacy Locker, that allow you to comeup with a plan for the life of youronline accounts after you’re gone,Cahn said. “As a society, we value the privacy ofour online account and we wantinternet service providers to protectour privacy and that means not givingothers access. If we thought about it,we might think differently after we die,” Cahn said.www.rockcenter.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/01/11995859-digital-afterlife-what-happens-to-your-online-accounts-when-you-die?lite

The Lagos State Government hassuspended the sack of the 788doctors recently relieved of theirduties from the governmentemployment. The suspension followed the intervention of the leadership of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and others led by the party, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu. Tinubu who addressed reporters onThursday alongside State Governor,Mr. Babatunde Fashola andCommissioner for Environment, Mr.Tunji Bello shortly after discussionwith the government, urged the doctors to return to work.www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news-update/48433-lagos-suspends-sack-of-788-doctors.html

Some days ago, controversial man ofGod, Apostle Sign Fireman posted avideo on video sharing site, YouTubeclaiming to have healed veteran actor,Enebeli Elebuwa of his partial strokeailment he has been battling with for some months now. The video showed Enebeli strugglingto walk during the healing servicedone for him. The pastor thereafterclaimed that in a matter of days,Enebeli would be able to walk well. In a political programme, FocusNigeria aired live on AfricanIndependent Television (AIT) thismorning, the show's presenter,Gbenga Aruleba reported thatinvestigation carried out reveals otherwise. According to the report, Pa Elebuwawas interviewed and he claimed thathis condition has not improved afterhis visit to Fireman's church some daysago. The report further disclosed that theactor is presently lying critically ill at anAbuja hospital, where he is currentlybeing taken care of by Nollywoodactress, Stella Damasus, who is payingthe bills. We called a representative of PaEnebeli, who exclusively told us thatthe claim by Apostle Fireman ofhealing Enebeli is not true. Therepresentative told us that the videoposted online should not be believed in anyway. We also put a call through to StellaDamasus on the story but our phonecalls were not picked as at the time ofpublishing this story.www.channelkoos.com/index.php/categoryblog/1672-pastor-sign-fireman-is-a-fraud-enebeli-elebuwa

If you ask for my opinion, I'd say this is senseless and an unjust verdict....politicians get sent to a few months/years in jail for stealing millions and now some poor folks get the death sentence for commiting a petty crime.Abakaliki -A High Court inAbakaliki on Wednesdaysentenced three men to death byhanging for stealing. The condemned men ChukwumaIdenyi, Nwobodo Omebe andMonday Ekwe of Izzi andAbakaliki Local GovernmentAreas dispossessed their victimsthe sum of N180, 925. Delivering the judgment, theJudge, Justice Paul Elechi, heldthat the prosecutor proved hiscase beyond reasonable doubt. Elechi, therefore, sentenced theaccused persons to death byhanging. NAN reports that the judgmentwas given after the partiesadopted their written addresses. In his argument before thejudgment was given, the counselto the defendants, Mr Vin Njoku,prayed the court to dismiss thematter. Njoku argued that theprosecuting counsel and thecomplainant failed to prove theircase beyond reasonable doubt. “There were contradictions of theamount by the complainant andthe prosecutor when the matterwas first reported to the policeand thereafter taken to court,” hesaid. Prosecuting counsel, Mr. Roy Udeargued that his client was robbedand disposed of the said amountcontributed by his community forschool projects. “If the accused persons were notproperly punished the trendwould continue in the communityand constitute threat to the peaceand security of the people. (NAN)www.vanguardngr.com/2012/05/court-condemns-3-to-death-for-stealing/what do u guys think?

Father says he is re-marrying to get somebody to cook and assist him in keeping the compound clean while Son says Dad should have discussed it with him before taking the wife!!! A United States-based Nigerian, Emeka Mazie,on Wednesday dragged his 96-year-old fatherto court for insisting to re-marry after thedemise of his wife eight years ago. The suit with number HU/54/2012 filed beforethe Umuahia High Court 4, is presided over byJustice Agwu Kalu. Counsel to the defendant, Ebere Orji, told thecourt that her client, Israel Mazie, (father ofEmeka), had contracted a marriage with EbereNdubuka under the Marriage Act, maintainingthat the plaintiff (only son of Israel) with hissisters was duly informed before the marriage was contracted. On the other hand, the Counsel to the Plaintiff,Ann Uchendu, told the court that Israel andNdubuka had yet to consummate theirmarriage traditionally, noting the defendantssecretly obtained a marriage certificate fromBende Local Government Area of Abia State. Israel told the court that his decision to re-marry was to get somebody to cook and assisthim in keeping the compound clean. “Since my wife died eight years ago, nobodycooks or assists in cleaning the compound forme. All my children live in America,” he claimed. The plaintiff told the court that he received withshock the plans of his father to re-marry at hisage. He said: “if my father must get anotherwife, he ought to discuss it with me.” The Judge on listening to both counsel urgedthe parties to respect the views of each other,noting that at the plaintiff’s age he would neverwish away his first son or the son abandon thefather. Kalu added that resorting to alternative disputeresolution became imperative as there was noserious dispute to judge on the case. Headjourned the matter to October 24 for reporton settlement.www.channelstv.com/home/2012/05/31/son-drags-96-year-old-father-to-court-for-taking-second-wife/

Jesus cares about you. Jesus do love you. Jesus has not forgotten you. Jesus still has you in mind. Dear Christians, Jesus is very much alive.....www.facebook.com/godfirstchristiansLike this page if u do care for Jesus as he cares for you. Follow the link and like the page to fellowship with other Christians.

ANewJerseymanallegedlycut outhisentrailsinfront of police and then threw bits of his flesh and intestines at them. The gruesome scene played out at a home in Hackensack, N.J., where 43- year-old Wayne Carter allegedly barricaded himself in on Sunday, NBC New York reported. Officers got a call that morning when a witness said Carter was threatening to harm himself with a knife. Two cops responded, kicked in the door and found Carter in the corner, the station reported. Carter allegedly ignored officers' orders to put down the knife, and instead began stabbing himself in the abdomen, neck and legs. An attempt to pepper spray the bleeding man had no effect, the Associated Press reported. That's when Carter -- disemboweled but responsive -- reportedly threw bitsof his skin and intestines at the officers. They decided to retreat and call in the Bergen County SWAT team, Hackensack police Lt. John Heinemann told reporters. The team was able to subdue Carter and get him to a hospital, where he remained in critical condition on Monday. Heinemann said he believes that drugs or mental illness may have led to the horrific incident, but those details haven't been confirmed. No charges have yet been filed due to the unusual nature of the incidentwww.channelkoos.com/index.php/news/1652-man-throws-intestines-at-officers-after-stabbing-himself-police-say

With what's happening today, I won't be surprised if a third WW was to happen in no distant time, the League of Nations could not prevent a second WW, how can the UN which replaced it be able to prevent a third WW, the UN might be able to keep the world at peace, but it's hold would not last, let's face reality, this earth has turned into a mini war zone, the reality of a third WW actually brings fear in the heart of man, but that does not mean we can actually prevent it by lying to ourselves, with the current situation, I don't think the UN would succeed in preventing a third WW for a long time, no matter how long a dam prevents a river from flowing, it must surely give way for the river one day.