I went for a bike ride this morning, the first real bike ride of the year (I’ve biked to and from work a couple of times, but this was the first real ride just for the sake of riding). There was some pissy drizzle at the start, but by the time I got on the bike path headed for Lock 8, the sun came out, and it was a cool, pleasant, calm spring morning.

As I was tooling down the path, I realized that I had the bike one gear higher than I usually do on that stretch of path, but I didn’t feel like I was working any harder than normal. “Gee, I guess I’m in better shape than I thought…” I said to myself.

Then I reached Lock 8, and turned around.

It turns out, I’m in just about exactly the shape I thought I was. What I was wrong about was the “calm” part of the weather description. There was actually a very steady wind blowing, that had been at my back the whole time (blowing from east to west, which is a little unusual, and why it hadn’t occurred to me as an explanation). When I turned around, I spent most of the ride back one gear lower than usual for that stretch of path.

So there’s today’s lesson on Experimental Physics for Morons: Wind resistance is a significant problem. Particularly if you’re 6’6″, 250 lbs– I’m around half a meter across at the shoulders, and nearly two-thirds of a meter from waist to shoulder, meaning that on a mountain bike, I’m like a giant goddamn sail.

Comments

Sounds like my ride last Saturday. I happily rode north for 10-15 miles, got a little bit lost, and decided to head back when I finally got my bearings. Sure enough, there was a stiff headwind, and my 16-18mph pace turned into a 8-10 mph pace for the ride home, and my legs did not thank me.

I was once in an old Chevy Nova with a 4-cylinder engine southbound on Interstate 15, heading for Barstow. On the flat stretch just before Elephant Mountain I had the gas pedal floored as the 65-knot headwind brought the car to a stop.

On the freeway.

(Northbound traffic was screaming by on the other side of the median ditch.)

The wind relented a little after a few minutes and the car began moving again, but I never got above 20 mph until I got halfway across the Mojave River and moved into the wind shadow of Main Street overpass and the railroad bridge.

I can recall taking a bike ride when I was a grad student in Boulder. Took off to the east, picked up a strong Chinook a couple of miles East of town (this was truly a stealth wind). Stupid me, I shoulda thought as I zipped past cars heading East, that I wasn’t that strong. But the delusion of superstrength was just too satisfying to question the why of it. When I reached the county line and turned around, then the awful truth was revealed (30mph plus headwinds). It was a very long difficult return trip.

Yeah I think everyone who rides a lot starts to get suspicious of smooth, fast, easy, early parts of rides. Personally I have ridden up mountains and I would take that any day as opposed to strong headwinds. And I am 220 lbs plus so I am not a climber.

Try running the Southern California Santa Anna winds sometime. :) A few weekends ago it felt like running through jello. At one point one gust blew me sideways slightly into the grass while airborne and a later sustained gust actually had me running in place for a few steps.

Nice calculation on the drag force above; perhaps that could be a homework problem for your students :) .

Ah, the cyclist’s lament. Headwinds always outnumber tailwinds and uphills always outnumber downhills. Actually the first is true because a tailwind slower than your bike speed will be a slight headwind and we perceive the second to be true because we take wo much less time to descend than to ascend. The situation gets amusing when you use your bean-fed jet assist and you are riding exactly at the tailwind’s speed.

6EQUJ5: Your Nova story gives credence to the reason that sales of that car didn’t do very well in Mexico – no va [doesn’t go].

The site is currently under maintenance. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.

Books

You've read the blog, now try the books:

Eureka: Discovering Your Inner Scientist will be published in December 2014 by Basic Books. "This fun, diverse, and accessible look at how science works will convert even the biggest science phobe." --Publishers Weekly (starred review) "In writing that is welcoming but not overly bouncy, persuasive in a careful way but also enticing, Orzel reveals the “process of looking at the world, figuring out how things work, testing that knowledge, and sharing it with others.”...With an easy hand, Orzel ties together card games with communicating in the laboratory; playing sports and learning how to test and refine; the details of some hard science—Rutherford’s gold foil, Cavendish’s lamps and magnets—and entertaining stories that disclose the process that leads from observation to colorful narrative." --Kirkus ReviewsGoogle+

How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books. "“Unlike quantum physics, which remains bizarre even to experts, much of relativity makes sense. Thus, Einstein’s special relativity merely states that the laws of physics and the speed of light are identical for all observers in smooth motion. This sounds trivial but leads to weird if delightfully comprehensible phenomena, provided someone like Orzel delivers a clear explanation of why.” --Kirkus Reviews "Bravo to both man and dog." The New York Times.

How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner. "It's hard to imagine a better way for the mathematically and scientifically challenged, in particular, to grasp basic quantum physics." -- Booklist "Chad Orzel's How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is an absolutely delightful book on many axes: first, its subject matter, quantum physics, is arguably the most mind-bending scientific subject we have; second, the device of the book -- a quantum physicist, Orzel, explains quantum physics to Emmy, his cheeky German shepherd -- is a hoot, and has the singular advantage of making the mind-bending a little less traumatic when the going gets tough (quantum physics has a certain irreducible complexity that precludes an easy understanding of its implications); finally, third, it is extremely well-written, combining a scientist's rigor and accuracy with a natural raconteur's storytelling skill." -- BoingBoing