Hi!
I am a newbie to this site. I joined because I have heard of the 350 small block chevy being an amazing engine, and having driven a 1989 2500 chevy (with a 350 chevy engine) silverado, and then a 1996 dodge 1500 ram with a 390 magnum engine, I felt the difference in power with the 350 chevy being the much more powerful.

So my question is what makes the chevy 350 so special, and so revered? I am a bit puzzled as to why the chevy has so much kick compared to the bigger engine(s)....... can anyone explain this to me?

cause they've been around forever, there's been a gazillion and a half made, and performance parts are less expensive than anything else. and they're reliably good motors. and cheap.
everyone and their cousin can afford to build one. not hatin'.

You may remember that one of the Teeming Millions once chastised Cecil for referring to "googols of snowflakes," pointing out that 1 googol was greater than the number of protons, electrons, and neutrons in the known universe. Sure, pal. Let's see you count 'em.

One last thing. The number list above refers to American number-naming practice. As long as we're quoting other Web know-it-alls (hey, why should Cecil have to do all the work?), here's what Doctor Math has to say on the topic:

"In the English speaking world, at least, there's already disagreement about what the word "billion" means. In the United States, it means 109; in Great Britain, it means 1012. The Brits add 6 zeroes per step up, and we add 3. So a British "trillion" is 1018. In a sense, the British system makes more sense--billion, trillion, quadrillion, etc., indicate 2, 3, and 4 from the roots of the names. If you think of them as meaning 2, 3, and 4 groups of 6 zeroes, everything makes good sense--and it makes no sense in the U.S. system."

Our number billion, I might add, is known in Britain as a "milliard." The Germans, who evidently follow British practice, take it a step farther and use die Billiarde, which is the equivalent of quadrillion in the U.S.

Are 307's a lot less powerfull than 350's? I had the opportunity of getting a truck with a 307 in it but in the end declined (as I was going to be pulling a double horse trailer with the truck) 'cos I wasn't sure of the power and reliability of it compared to the truck I had (which had a 350 in it). I am new to all this V8 stuff, but find the V8 engines intriguing. Pity they don't make a V12 truck (not including the Lamborghini Truck)!!

Originally posted by judgedredd ....1996 dodge 1500 ram with a 390 magnum engine...

I believe that would have been a 360 magnum not a 390.

Quote:

Originally posted by poncho62 More than you can say for a "Hemi"....................sorry CMG and Centerline.........................

Actually, when Chevrolet was touting the brand new special high performance version of their 265 cu. in. small block V8, available only in the Corvette (all of 195 hp.). Chrysler Corp. was destroying the competition in NASCAR with their little old 300 hp. 331 cu. in. HEMI. An engine that had already been in production for 4 years. Unfortunately they did have a break in production from 1958-1963 because the bean counters managed to convince management the engine was too expensive to manufacture, but when they did come back in 1964 it was with a vengeance, and they have continued, in one version or another, to rule the top fuel and funny car divisions ever since. Remember, the next time you're at the strip that even though that funny car has a Ford or GM body on it, the motivation comes from a HEMI.

To me, that means....dollar for dollar, the SBC was worth keeping around, whereas the Hemi was not. Something that the average guy could afford.........................that's just how my simple mind works.

I remember the engineering reviews made comments about those "Mickey Mouse" rocker arms. What they didn't know was GM had done extensive testing with strobe lights on running engines and they had discovered that, at high rpm, engines with rocker shafts with rocker arms mounted on them, distorted significantly, thereby upsetting the cam/valve timing. By mounting each valve system with its own independent rocker support cam/valve timing remained as designed.

To me, that means....dollar for dollar, the SBC was worth keeping around, whereas the Hemi was not. Something that the average guy could afford.........................that's just how my simple mind works.

I agree. They weren't cheap then and they certainly aren't now. Class is never cheap.

The bean counters had a very good argument since Dodge, Chrysler and DeSoto all had their own versions of the hemi and very few parts interchanged between divisions. Even a first year economics student can tell that this translates to three times the manufacturing expense. That I blame on Chrysler's management more than anything else. They did learn their lesson though since subsequent versions were totally interchangeable.

There's no argument that the SBC is affordable, plentiful, and reliable. They're just boring. Why everyone wants to be just like everyone else escapes me. Especially when there are so many other good power plants out there like the Buick Nailhead, Flathead Ford and some of the big Caddy and Olds motors, and yes even the hemi. Why be an also ran, I say do something different..... anything but a SBC.

Originally posted by Poncho62
It's just that they have been around so long...............50 years in 2005.

Hmmmm, we went from Wright brothers Kitty Hawk to SR71 in about 50 years too. According to that view we should have a nuke powered 350, or something similar to the engine in 'Back to the Future' that runs on just about anything you stuff into it!

hey centerline sounds like a really nice guy. As for poncho I dunno sounds like he got involved with a bad crowd or something. I mean come on what kind of fool wants a cracker jack chevy engine when they could have such a nicer engine. J/K I dont really have nothing against chevy but If I had a choice I prefer Mopar

It's just that they have been around so long...............50 years in 2005.

More than you can say for a "Hemi"....................sorry CMG and Centerline.........................

Au contrare! The 331 in my Willys debuted in 1951. The SBC debuted as an anemic 265 in 1955. Didn't approach the small hemi in displacement until the 327 came out in 1967(?).

As far as power is concerned, displacement is only one variable to consider. There are +400cuin engines out there that can't get out of their own way, 'cause the factory designed them for grand-ma's grocery getter or grand-pa's clod hopper. Do a mild hop-up of a 350 and it will run circles around a lo-perf big block.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:

Password

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:

Confirm Password:

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:

Log-in

User Name

Remember Me?

Password

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.