The FSSP or the Priestly
Fraternity of St. Peter (In Latin: Fraternitas Sacerdotalis
Sancti Petri - FSSP) is a group of self-professed traditionalist
Catholic “priests” and seminarians in good standing with
the Vatican II sect.

According to a FSSP website:

“In 1988,
Pope St. John Paul II established the Priestly Fraternity of St.
Peter (FSSP) as a Society of Apostolic Life of Pontifical Right and
approved its constitutions. The Fraternity was founded for the
formation and sanctification of priests in accordance with the
Traditional Latin rites, and for their deployment in the service of
the Church. The FSSP seeks to reunite those who feel attached to
some previous liturgical and disciplinary forms of the Latin
Tradition (Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei, July 1988), and have felt
alienated for some reason or other. The FSSP offers the sacred
liturgy in all of its solemnity according to the Latin liturgical
books of 1962, and strives to give the faithful sound catechetical
teaching within the living tradition of the Church that is ever
ancient, ever new. The Fraternity functions under the auspices of,
and in complete union with, His Holiness Pope Francis I, and the
Ordinary of the dioceses in which they serve.”

“The
Fraternity of St. Peter currently operates two international houses
of formation: the original formation house in Wigratzbad, Germany
(diocese of Augsburg), and the other in Denton, Nebraska, U.S.A.
(diocese of Lincoln). The Fraternity has organized its seminary
training in accordance with the Church’s norms on priestly
formation, including a year of more intense spiritual preparation
before entering the cycles of philosophy and theology. By fostering a
balanced life of prayer, study, community life, and personal
discipline, care is taken to foster human maturity and to acquire the
spirit of the Gospel, in close union with Christ. The spiritual life
in the houses is centered on the sacrifice of the Mass. Special
attention is paid to the faithful observance of the "liturgical
and spiritual traditions" according to the dispositions of the
Motu proprio Ecclesia Dei adflicta of July 2, 1988, which is
at the origin of the Fraternity’s foundation (Constitutions,
Art. 8).”

However, the Fraternity of St. Peter is
horribly heretical. They accept Antipope Benedict XVI, Antipope
Francis etc., Vatican II, false ecumenism, salvation outside the
Church, the New Mass, among other heresies. Their so-called priests
are faithless apostates. Their positions are of course false,
heretical, contradictory and completely refuted by Catholic truth.
Their “priests” do not adhere to or understand the
Catholic faith.

They also utilize “bishops”
who were made “bishops” in Antipope Paul VI’s new
rite of episcopal consecration. That rite cannot be considered valid.
They are therefore not validly ordained bishops or priests. One must
not go to the FSSP, as they are heretical and use “priests”
ordained by “bishops” made “bishops” in the
rite of Antipope Paul VI.

Groups like the SSPX and FSSP really
need to wake up and accept that the Vatican II sect is not the
Catholic Church. Benedict XVI or Francis is not the pope. One must
not attend the New Mass. It’s invalid. To affirm otherwise is
to profess a unity of faith with heretics who embrace false
religions, teach salvation outside the Church and hold other
heresies. That is contrary to the faith, since the Catholic Church
has a unity of sacraments, as well as of dogmas and hierarchy.

The changes Antipope Paul VI made in
the new rite of ordination are so similar to the changes the
Anglicans made that it is a mystery of iniquity why anyone would hold
any men ordained in it to be priests…

History

The F.S.S.P. was established on July
18, 1988 at the Abbey of Hauterive, Switzerland by twelve priests and
a score of seminarians, led by “Father” Josef Bisig, all
of whom had formerly belonged to “Archbishop” Marcel
Lefebvre’s Society of St. Pius X; they were unwilling to follow
that movement into what the Vatican II’s Congregation for
“Bishops” and “Pope” John Paul II defined to
be a “schismatic” act and grounds for “excommunication”
latæ sententiæ due to the consecration of four
bishops by Marcel Lefebvre without a papal mandate. Father Josef
Bisig became the Fraternity’s first superior general.

Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop Antonio
de Castro Meyer consecrated four Bishops at Écône,
Switzerland (Bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais,
Richard Williamson, and Alfonso de Galarreta) in opposition to the
modernism and indifferentism rampant in the Vatican II sect; in
response the Vatican II Church pretended to excommunicate them
(however, heretics cannot excommunicate anyone and all heretics are
already automatically excommunicated from the Church), which they
later claimed to rescind under Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI).

As of October 2011, the Priestly
Fraternity of Saint Peter included 392 members: 228 “priests”,
10 “deacons”, and 154 seminarians in 117 dioceses spread
among Australia, Austria, Benin, Canada, Colombia, France, Germany,
Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Nigeria, Poland, Switzerland,
and the USA. The Fraternity’s membership represents 35
nationalities, and the average age of its members is 36. The lay
Confraternity of Saint Peter enrolls 3,487 members who spiritually
support the Fraternity’s heretical and schismatical charism.

Since the introduction of the new
sacramental rites, Rome had allowed no religious society or
congregation exclusive use of the older rites. Then on June 30, 1988,
Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops to ensure the survival
of the traditional priesthood and sacraments, and especially of the
traditional Latin Mass.

It is in large part because of the SSPX
(and other traditionalist societies) that the Vatican II sect has
responded by creating their own traditional societies to poach
members and bring them under their control, such as the Priestly
Fraternity of St. Peter and Fraternity of St. Vincent Ferrer.
There have been break-aways from the SSPX over the years such as the
Society of St. Pius V (or SSPV).

Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter: Some Salient
Problems

Q. I am not a sedevacantist. Do
you have any reflections on the problems with the Fraternity of St.
Peter apart from the pope question?

FSSP “priests” cannot condemn any of
these things; Fraternity members purchase “official approval”
with the coin of their silence, whether it be silent resistance, or
outright approval. Nor, logically speaking, could FSSP condemn
such things — for while their organization is enjoying official
approval in its side chapel of the Conciliar Church, John Paul
II, for example, is at the main altar with the dancers for the
African Synod Mass, an officially-approved female in another chapel
is popping hosts in the officially-approved way into people’s
hands, and someone else in still another chapel is running kiddy
Masses according to the officially-approved Children’s
Directory.

The traditional “Mass” and
the traditional “faith” are thus reduced to nothing more
than one dish among the many officially approved for the post-Vatican
II smorgasbord. Worship and belief become nothing more than a matter
of “preference” — I like the old way, you like the
new way, and we’re all one big happy post-Vatican II family.

Lay people sometimes are oblivious to
this broader picture. They see a traditional Mass, and presume all is
well. It’s not. In reality, the Fraternity of St. Peter is
leading its lay adherents bit by bit into the high-church, nostalgia
wing of the ecumenical, post-Vatican religion of apostasy.

What the SSPX think of the Fraternity of St.
Peter

Within two days of Archbishop
Lefebvre’s consecrations, “John Paul II recognized
(Ecclesia Dei Afflicta, July 2, 1988) the “rightful
aspirations” (for these things) of those who wouldn’t
support Archbishop Lefebvre’s stance, and offered to give to
them what he had always refused the Archbishop. A dozen or so priests
of the SSPX accepted this “good will” and broke
away to found the Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP).”

The SSPX goes on to say:

“The Fraternity of St. Peter
is founded upon more than questionable principles, for the
following reasons:

1. It accepts
that the Conciliar Church has the power:

to
take away the Mass of all time (for the Novus
Ordo Missae is not another form
of this, question 5),

to
grant it [the mass] to those only who accept the same Conciliar
Church’s novel orientations (in life, belief, structures),

to
declare non-Catholic those who deny this by word or deed (An
interpretation of "Everyone should be aware that formal
adherence to the schism [of Archbishop Lefebvre] is a
grave offense against God and carries the penalty of
excommunication."Ecclesia Dei Afflicata), and,

to
professes itself in a certain way in communion with anyone
calling himself “Christian,” and yet to declare
itself out of communion with Catholics whose sole crime is
wanting to remain Catholic (Vatican II, e.g., Lumen Gentium,
§15; Unitatis Redintegratio §3).

In practice, the priests of the
Fraternity, having recourse to a Novus Ordo bishop willing
to permit the traditional rites and willing to ordain their
candidates, they are forced to abandon the fight against the new
religion which is being installed:

they
reject the Novus Ordo Missae only because it is not their
“spirituality” and claim the traditional
Latin Mass only in virtue of their “charism”
acknowledged them by the pope,

they
seek to ingratiate themselves with the local bishops, praising
them for the least sign of Catholic spirit and keeping quiet on
their modernist deviations (unless perhaps it is a question of a
diocese where they have no hopes of starting up), even though by
doing so they end up encouraging them along their wrong path,
and

note,
for example, the Fraternity’s whole-hearted acceptance of
the (New) Catechism of the Catholic Church
(question 14), acceptance of Novus Ordo professors in their
seminaries, and blanket acceptance of Vatican II’s
orthodoxy (question 6).

They are therefore Conciliar
Catholics and not traditional Catholics.

This being so, attending their Mass is:

accepting
the compromise on which they are based,

accepting
the direction taken by the Conciliar Church and the consequent
destruction of the Catholic Faith and practices, and

accepting,
in particular, the lawfulness and doctrinal soundness of the
Novus Ordo Missae and Vatican II.

That is why a Catholic ought not to attend their Masses.”

In fact, Catholics must not attend the
masses or religious services of any non-Catholics whatsoever.

1917 Code of
Canon Law, Canon 823: “Mass may not be said in
churches of heretics or schismatics, even though they were in the
past properly consecrated or blessed.”

Pope Pius XI,
Mortalium animos, (06/01/1928): “So, Venerable
Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its
subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics.”

The Great Apostasy Is upon Us!

The One, Holy, Catholic, and
Apostolic Church CONDEMNS the Vatican II “Church” & Its False
Prophets, the Apostate Antipopes.

Some
Heresies of the

Vatican
II “Church”

&

The
Antipopes

Dogmas
of

The
Holy Catholic Church

&

The
Catholic Popes

Non-Catholic religions are a
means to salvation

Vatican II, Unitatis
Redintegratio: “3. ... separated Churches and
Communities... have by no means been deprived of significance and
importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of
Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation.”

John Paul II, Catechesi
Tradendae: “32. …the other Churches and
ecclesial communities that the Spirit of Christ does not refrain
from using as means of salvation.”

Moslems worship the true God

Vatican II, Nostra Aetate: “3.
The Church has also high esteem for the Muslims. They
worship God, who is one, living and subsistent, merciful and
almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth...”

John Paul II, May 5, 1999:
“Muslims, who ‘together with us adore the one,
merciful God… We believe in the same God, the
one God, the living God, the God who created the world and brings
His creatures to their perfection.’ ” (General
Audience)

Benedict XVI, General Audience,
Sept. 20, 2006: “I hope that in the various
circumstances during my Visit – for example, when in Munich
I emphasized how important it is to respect what is sacred to
others – that my deep respect for the great religions, and
especially the Muslims, who ‘worship God…’
appeared quite clear!”

Vatican II document, Lumen
Gentium # 16: “But the plan of salvation also embraces
those who acknowledge the Creator, and among these the MOSLEMS are
first; they profess to hold the faith of Abraham AND ALONG WITH US
THEY WORSHIP THE ONE MERCIFUL GOD WHO WILL JUDGE
HUMANITY ON THE LAST DAY.”

Antipope Paul VI, Address, Dec.
2, 1977: “… the Moslems (who) profess to hold the
faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one,
merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day, as the
Second Vatican Council solemnly declared.”

Antipope Paul VI, Address, Sept.
18, 1969: “… Moslems… along with us adore
the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge
mankind.”

Antipope Francis, Evangelii
Gaudium (# 252), Nov. 24, 2013: “Islam... they “profess
to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore
the one, merciful God, who will judge humanity on the last day...”

Catholics can pray in
communion with non- Catholics

Vatican II, Unitatis
Redintegratio: “8. In certain special circumstances,
such as in prayer services ‘for unity’ and during
ecumenical gatherings, it is allowable, indeed desirable, that
Catholics should join in prayer with their separated
brethren...the gaining of needed grace sometimes commends.”

Francis, Conversations With Jorge
Bergoglio, p. 208: “Not long ago I was in a synagogue
taking part in a ceremony. I prayed a lot and, while praying,
I heard a phrase from one of the books of wisdom that had slipped
my mind: ‘Lord, may I bear mockery in silence.’ It
gave me much peace and joy.”

John Paul II, Ut Unum Sint:
“24. With profound emotion I remember praying together
with the Primate of the Anglican Communion at Canterbury
Cathedral (29 May 1982)...”

Benedict XVI, General Audience,
Dec. 6, 2006: “In the area of interreligious dialogue,
divine Providence granted me, almost at the end of my Journey, an
unscheduled Visit which proved rather important: my Visit to
Istanbul’s famous Blue Mosque. Pausing for a few minutes of
recollection in that place of prayer, I addressed the one Lord
of Heaven and Earth, the Merciful Father of all humanity.”

In 2006, Benedict XVI also praised
the 1986 interreligious prayer meeting at Assisi held by John Paul
II. On Oct. 27, 1986, John Paul II invited the major leaders of
all the false religions of the world to come to Assisi, Italy for
a “World Day of Prayer for Peace”. John Paul II prayed
with over 100 different religious leaders of various false
religions, thereby repudiating the teaching of Scripture and the
2000-year teaching of the Catholic Church which outlaws such
prayer with false religions. The entire day of prayer with the
pagans, infidels and heretics was John Paul II’s idea.
During this meeting the Dalai Lama placed a Buddhist statue on the
tabernacle in the Church of St. Francis.

Benedict XVI, Message, Sept. 2, 2006: “This
year is the 20th anniversary of the Interreligious
Meeting of Prayer for Peace, desired by my venerable
Predecessor John Paul II on 27 October 1986 in Assisi. It is well
known that he did not only invite Christians of various
denominations to this Meeting but also the exponents of
different religions. It constituted a vibrant message
furthering peace and an event that left its mark on the history of
our time… attestations of the close bond that exists
between the relationship with God and the ethics of love are
recorded in all great religious traditions. Among the
features of the 1986 Meeting, it should be stressed that this
value of prayer in building peace was testified to by the
representatives of different religious traditions, and this
did not happen at a distance but in the context of a meeting…
We are in greater need of this dialogue than ever… I am
glad, therefore, that the initiatives planned in Assisi
this year are along these lines and, in particular, that the
Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue has had the idea of
applying them in a special way for young people… I gladly
take this opportunity to greet the representatives of other
religions who are taking part in one or other of the
Assisi commemorations. Like us Christians, they know that in
prayer it is possible to have a special experience of God and
to draw from it effective incentives for dedication to the cause
of peace.”

Non-Catholic religions are not
a means to salvation

Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctum:
“… The Catholic Church… outside which
there is no salvation nor remission of sin.”

This is an amazing blasphemy!
Catholics are worshippers of Jesus Christ and the Most Holy
Trinity; the Muslims are not! Even a child can understand that we
don’t have the same God.

“Whosoever denieth the Son,
the same hath not the Father.” (1Jn 2:22-23)

Nicene Creed: “I
believe in one God, the Father Almighty…and in one Lord
Jesus Christ…who was incarnate by the Holy Spirit…
and I believe in the Holy Spirit…and in one, holy,
Catholic, and apostolic Church…”

Pope Gregory XVI, Summo Iugiter
Studio (# 6), May 27, 1832: “Therefore, they must
instruct them in the true worship of God, which is unique to
the Catholic religion.”

Pope St. Gregory the Great:
“The holy universal Church teaches that it is not
possible to worship God truly except in Her...”

It’s clearly a denial of the
Most Holy Trinity to assert that Muslims worship the true God
without worshipping the Trinity. Secondly, and even worse when
considered carefully, is the astounding statement that Muslims
worship the One Merciful God Who will judge humanity on the
last day! This is an incredible heresy. Muslims
don’t worship Jesus Christ, who is humanity’s supreme
judge on the last day. Therefore, they don’t worship God who
will judge mankind on the last day! To say that Muslims do worship
God who will judge mankind on the last day, as Vatican II does in
Lumen Gentium 16, is to deny that Jesus Christ will judge mankind
on the last day.

Pope St. Damasus I, Council of
Rome, Can. 15: “If anyone does not
say that HE (JESUS CHRIST)…WILL
COME TO JUDGE THE LIVING AND THE DEAD, HE
IS A HERETIC.”

Catholics cannot pray in
communion with non-Catholics

Third Council of Constantinople,
680-681: “If any ecclesiastic or layman shall go into
the synagogue of the Jews or the meetinghouses of the heretics to
join in prayer with them, let them be deposed and deprived
of communion. If any bishop or priest or deacon shall join in
prayer with heretics, let him be suspended from communion.”

Council of Carthage: “One
must neither pray nor sing psalms with heretics, and whosoever
shall communicate with those who are cut off from the communion of
the Church, whether clergy or layman, let him be excommunicated.”

Council of Laodicea, Canon 9
(A.D. 363-364): “The members of the Church are not
allowed to meet... any of the heretics, for prayer or service;
but such as so do, if they be communicants, shall be
excommunicated for a time; but if they repent and confess that
they have sinned they shall be received.”

Apostolic Constitutions, Canon
65: “If any one, either of the clergy or laity, enters
into a synagogue of the Jews or heretics to pray, let him be
deprived and suspended.”

In his Jan. 6, 1928 encyclical
Mortalium Animos Pope Pius XI specifically condemned
Catholic participation in interreligious prayer meetings as
apostasy. He taught that those who favor this activity have
abandoned the Catholic religion.

Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 2), Jan. 6, 1928: “For
since they [who seek to unite] hold it for certain that men
destitute of all religious sense are very rarely to be found, they
seem to have founded on that belief a hope that the nations,
although they differ among themselves in certain religious
matters, will without much difficulty come to agree as brethren in
professing certain doctrines, which form as it were a common basis
of the spiritual life. For which reason conventions, meetings
and addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at
which a large number of listeners are present, and at which all
without distinction are invited to join in the discussion, both
infidels of every kind, and Christians, even those who have
unhappily fallen away from Christ or who with obstinacy and
pertinacity deny His divine nature and mission. Certainly such
attempts can nowise be approved by Catholics, founded as they are
on that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or
less good and praiseworthy, since they all in different ways
manifest and signify that sense which is inborn in us all, and by
which we are led to the obedient acknowledgment of His rule. Not
only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but
also in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it,
and little by little, turn aside to naturalism and atheism, as it
is called; from which it clearly follows that one who supports
those who hold these theories and attempt to realize them, is
altogether abandoning the divinely revealed religion. …
So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic
See has never allowed its subjects to take
part in the assemblies of non-Catholics.”

The Holy Catholic Church is primarily
recognized by Her Faith. She is one in the Faith that Christ handed
down from the apostles through the popes. Truths of faith and morals
that popes infallibly define are officially known as dogmas. All of
the dogmas of the Catholic Church are referred to as the “Deposit
of Faith.” All Catholics must believe the full Deposit of Faith
and therefore must not deny or doubt even one dogma. The obstinate
doubt or denial of even one dogma makes a Catholic a heretic and
automatically excommunicates him.

The past infallible teachings of the
Church cannot be contradicted by a future pope. A pope who publicly
commits an act of heresy in word or deed becomes automatically
excommunicated and automatically loses the papal office by the
operation of Church law (Canon 188, n. 4). It is the Church Herself,
not a man, who automatically deposes a pope who publicly teaches
heresy.

It has been infallibly taught in the
bull Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, 1559, that if a candidate for
the papacy was a heretic before his election to the papacy, and even
if he was elected by the unanimous consent of the cardinals, his
election would be null and void: “We declare that if ever a…
sovereign Pope, had, before their elevation to
the Cardinalate or Pontificate, deviated from the Catholic Faith or
fallen into some heresy, the promotion or elevation—even if it
had taken place with the unanimous assent of the Cardinals—is
invalid and null.” This is also why
the Popes, Saints and Doctors of the Church consistently teach that
if a Pope were to become a manifest heretic he would immediately lose
the office of Pope.

St. Antoninus: “In
the case in which the pope would become a heretic, he would find
himself, by that fact alone and without any other sentence, separated
from the Church. A head separated from a body cannot, as long as it
remains separated, be head of the same body from which it was cut
off. A pope who would be separated from the Church by heresy,
therefore, would by that very fact itself cease to be head of the
Church. He could not be a heretic and remain pope,
because, since he is outside of the Church, he cannot possess the
keys of the Church.” (Summa Theologica, cited in Actes
de Vatican I. V. Frond pub.)

Pope Leo XIII,
Satis Cognitum, 15, June, 1896: “No one, therefore, unless
in communion with Peter can share in this authority, since it
is absurd to imagine that he who is outside
can command in the Church.”

Pope Eugene IV,
Council of Florence, ex cathedra: “The Holy Roman
Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those
who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but
also Jews or heretics and schismatics…”

St. Alphonsus,
Bishop and Doctor of the Church: “If ever a Pope, as a private
person, should fall into heresy, he would at once fall from the
Pontificate.” (Oeuvres Complètes. 9:232)

St. Francis De
Sales, Bishop and Doctor of the Church: “Now when the Pope
is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his
dignity and out of the Church…” (The Catholic
Controversy, TAN Books, pp. 305-306)

St. Robert
Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church: “This
principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be
Pope, as Cajetan himself admits. The reason for this is that he
cannot be head of what he is not a member; now he who is not a
Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is
not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian, St. Athanasius,
St. Augustine, St. Jerome and others; therefore the
manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” (De Romano
Pontifice, II, 30)

Pope Innocent III,
Sermon 4, 1198: “The Roman Pontiff has no superior but
God. Who, therefore, (should a pope ‘lose his savor’)
could cast him out or trample him under foot—since of the pope
it is said ‘gather thy flock into thy fold’? Truly, he
should not flatter himself about his power, nor should he rashly
glory in his honor and high estate, because the less he is judged by
man, the more he is judged by God. Still the less can the Roman
Pontiff glory because he can be judged by men or rather, can be
shown to be already judged, if, for example, he should
wither away into heresy; because “he who does not
believe is already judged.” (St. John 3:18) In such a case it
should be said of him: ‘If salt should lose its savor, it is
good for nothing but to be cast out and trampled under foot by men.’”

St. Robert
Bellarmine: “A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically
(per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as
he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church.
Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church.
This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that
manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction.” (De
Romano Pontifice, II, 30)

And the truth expressed by these
saints, such as St. Robert Bellarmine, that a heretic cannot be the
Pope or a member of the Church, is not merely their fallible opinion,
as some defenders of the Antipopes have argued; rather, the teaching
expressed by these saints is a dogmatic fact backed up the Popes, and
is rooted in the infallible dogma that heretics cannot be members
of the Catholic Church, which is why Pope Innocent III taught
that a Pope is “already judged, if, for example, he should
wither away into heresy.”

Pope Leo XIII,
Satis Cognitum (# 9): “No one who merely disbelieves in
all (these heresies) can for that reason regard himself as a Catholic
or call himself one. For there may be or may arise some other
heresies, which are not set out in this work of ours, and, if any
one holds to a single one of these he is not a Catholic.”

Pope Pius XII,
Mystici Corporis Christi (# 23), June 29, 1943: “For not
every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to
sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or
heresy or apostasy.”

We can see that it’s the teaching
of the Catholic Church that a man is severed from the Church and
Salvation by heresy, schism or apostasy.

The apostate antipopes of the Vatican
II Church cannot thus be popes because they were and are notorious
heretics. The Vatican II documents contain several heresies.
Hence the bishops who consented to Vatican II became automatically
excommunicated heretics and automatically lost their offices, that
is, if they had not lost them previously. These truths that we have
just stated are supported by the infallible teachings of the Catholic
Church. We will now summarize them:

A. A pope infallibly defines truths which thereafter become
known as dogmas.

B. A heresy is the denial of a dogma. A heretic obstinately
doubts or denies a dogma.

C. A heretic is automatically excommunicated by the Catholic
Church with no need of a warning or declaration. (c. 2314, § 1)

D. If a prelate (a pope or bishop) were to fall away from the
Catholic faith by publicly teaching heresy, he would be automatically
excommunicated and lose his office by the operation of Church law and
without a declaration. (c. 188, n. 4)

E. The Second Vatican Council and its apostate antipopes
publicly teach heresies; therefore, they are not Catholic and cannot
be identified with the Catholic Church, whose faith is the same as
handed down from the apostles through the popes.

F. As a spiritual act of mercy, it is a Catholic’s duty
to admonish the sinner, which includes condemning heresies, and
denouncing heretics and avoiding them in religious matters. If a
Catholic does not do this when the situation presents itself, he is
guilty of mortal sins of omission and association.

Now that you have read this
information, you will be more culpable on Judgment Day if you do not
accept these truths: “We declare that a great number of those
who are condemned to eternal punishment suffer that everlasting
calamity because of ignorance of those mysteries of faith which must
be known and believed in order to be numbered among the elect.”
(Pope Pius X, Acerbo Nimis, #2, April 15, 1905) Anyone who
obstinately attends Mass in a church that teaches any Vatican II
heresy or any other heresy is on the road to hell.

Some of Apostate Antipope John Paul II’s
Crimes of Idolatry!

“I am
the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have strange gods before Me.”

(Exodus 20:2-3)

John Paul II prayed with Protestants
and Schismatics. He prayed with apostate Jews and entered their main
synagogue in Rome, treating them not just as equals but as “elder
brothers in the faith.” He prayed with and honored 150
non-Catholic religions at Assisi and was present while a Buddha was
placed on the tabernacle in the basilica at Assisi and praised the
event afterward. He entered the main Buddhist temple and honored and
venerated the Buddhist patriarch and a golden idol of Buddha by
bowing down barefooted before both. He received a mark of Shiva, the
Hindu war god, upon his forehead. He drank a potion mixed by a pagan
witch doctor on the island of Papua, New Guinea. He praised, honored,
and venerated the pagan Hindu Ghandi and knelt before his memorial
while referring to him as one would to a saint. He also kissed the
Koran in Iraq and asked Saint John the Baptist to protect Islam.

And much more! See The
Amazing Heresies of “Saint” John Paul II Exposed.
We have compiled and documented pictorial and written proof of the
above crimes of heresy and idolatry. Visit the above address or view
the website for detailed information regarding the facts set forth in
this article.

St. Robert Bellarmine, Doctor of the
Church, De Romano Pontifice: “It is proven with
arguments from authority and from reason that the manifest heretic is
ipso facto deposed... which means before any excommunication
or judicial sentence... therefore the manifest heretic cannot be
pope... A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be
pope and head of the Church...”

The Second Vatican Council’s Apostasy on
Atheism and Atheists!

God
defined infallibly, based on Romans 1, that the one true God can be
known with certitude by the things which have been made, and by the
natural light of human reason.

Romans
1:19-21: “Because that which is known of God is manifest in
them. For God hath manifested it unto them. For the invisible
things of Him, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made; His eternal power also,
and divinity: SO THAT THEY ARE INEXCUSABLE.”

Yet,
the Vatican II sect officially teaches that one can be an atheist
through no fault of his own:

Vatican
II document, Lumen Gentium # 16: “Nor does divine
providence deny the helps that are necessary for salvation to those
who, through no fault of their own, have not yet attained to the
express recognition of God yet who strive, not without divine
grace, to lead an upright life.”

Vatican
II is teaching here that there are some people who, THROUGH NO
FAULT OF THEIR OWN, have not yet attained to the express
recognition of God. In other words, there are people who,
through no fault of their own, don’t believe in God (i.e., are
atheists). This is heresy.

St.
Paul teaches that atheists are inexcusable because God’s
creation proves His existence. Vatican II and Francis, on the
contrary, teaches that atheists can be excused and saved. This causes
us to ask, “What bible was Vatican II and Francis using?”
It must have been the revised satanic edition.

Yet
despite this dogmatic teaching based on Romans 1, in On Heaven and
Earth, pp. 12-13 Francis says he respects atheists and doesn’t
try to convert them. He also says that their “life is not
condemned”:

“I
do not approach the relationship in order to proselytize,
or convert the atheist; I respect him… nor
would I say that his life is condemned, because I am convinced
that I do not have the right to make a judgment about the honesty of
that person… every man is the image of God, whether he is a
believer or not. For that reason alone everyone has a series of
virtues, qualities, and a greatness of his own.” (Francis,
On Heaven and Earth, pp. 12-13)

In
contrast to Francis, the Council of Florence dogmatically defined
that any individual who has a view contrary to the Catholic Church’s
teaching on Our Lord Jesus Christ or the Trinity, or any one of the
truths about Our Lord or the Trinity, is rejected,
condemned and anathematized by God.

Pope
Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Bull Cantate Domino, 1442, ex
cathedra: “… the holy Roman Church, founded on the words
of our Lord and Savior, firmly believes, professes and preaches
one true God, almighty, immutable and eternal, Father, Son
and Holy Spirit… Therefore it [the
Church] condemns, rejects,
anathematizes and declares to be outside
the Body of Christ [and of God], which is the Church,
whoever holds opposing or contrary views.”

An
atheist interviewed Francis for the Italian newspaper The
Republic. The interview was published on October 1, 2013. Francis
directly told the atheist that he has no intention of trying to
convert him. Francis rejects proselytism four different times in this
interview. Francis declared: “Proselytism is solemn
nonsense, it makes no sense.”

Now,
our Lord commanded the apostle to go and proselytize, to go and
teach. He said: “Go ye therefore, and teach all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son,
and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever
I have commended you.” (Matthew 28:19)

The
Catholic Church infallibly teaches that atheists are condemned and
that they must be converted to the Catholic faith for salvation.
Yet, Antipope Francis is dominating the headlines around the world
with his assertion that people don’t need to
believe in God to get to heaven.

Antipope
Francis, Evangelii Gaudium (# 254), Nov. 24, 2013:
“Non-Christians [such as pagans and atheists],
by God’s gracious initiative, when they are faithful
to their own consciences, can live “justified
by the grace of God”, and thus be “associated
to the paschal mystery of Jesus Christ”… to the
sacramental dimension of sanctifying grace... to
live our own beliefs.”

Concerning
atheists, Francis wrote:

“First
of all, you ask if the God of Christians forgives
those who do not believe and do not seek faith. Given that - and
this is fundamental - God’s mercy has no limits if he who asks
for mercy does so in contrition and with a sincere heart, the
issue for those who do not believe in God is in obeying
their own conscience. In fact, listening and obeying it,
means deciding about what is perceived to be good or to be evil. The
goodness or the wickedness of our behavior depends on this decision.”
(“Pope” Francisco writes to La Repubblica: “An open
dialogue with non-believers”, 2013/09/11/)

Here
Francis clearly indicates that people who don’t believe in God
can be forgiven and saved if they obey their own conscience and
follow what they perceive to be good; and later in his “Evangelii
Gaudium” (254) he confirmed that this indeed was what he
meant. So don’t allow any liar to claim that Francis’
statement has been misrepresented. It has not been misrepresented as
Antipope Francis himself confirmed.

That’s
an astounding heresy because it’s a basic dogma of Catholicism
that faith is necessary for salvation. This is a fundamental issue.
As Hebrews 11:6 says, “…without faith it is impossible
to please God.”

Based
on Romans 1:20, which teaches that all who deny the existence of God
are inexcusable, Vatican I solemnly declared in Canon 1, On
Revelation, “If anyone shall have said that the one true
God, our Creator and Lord, cannot be known with certitude by those
things which have been made, by the natural light of human reason:
let him be anathema.”

Therefore,
the position that atheists can be excused (and saved) for not
recognizing what is clear from the natural light of human reason,
namely, that there is a God, is an anathematized heresy.

In
Canon 1, On God the Creator, Vatican I also declared, “If
anyone shall have denied the one true God, Creator and Lord of
visible and invisible things, let him be anathema.”

That
means that anyone who denies God or His existence, is specifically
anathematized.

Francis
and the Vatican II sect’s statements rejects these dogmatic
definitions, in addition to all the others previously mentioned.
People need to recognize the significance of this heresy.

The Second Vatican Council’s Apostasy on
the Jews!

The Catholic Church also teaches infallibly that the Old
Covenant ceased with the coming of Christ, and was replaced with the
New Covenant. The Council of Florence taught that those who practice
the Old Law and the Jewish religion are sinning mortally and are
“alien to the Christian faith and not in the least
fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday
they recover from these errors.” (Denzinger 712)

In
2001, however, the Pontifical Biblical Commission released a book
entitled The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the
Christian Bible. This book rejects the dogma that the
Old Covenant has ceased. It teaches that the Old Covenant is still
valid, and that the Jews’ wait for the Coming of the Messiah
(which was part of the Old Covenant) is also still valid. It teaches
that Jesus doesn’t have to be seen as the prophesied
Messiah; it is possible to see Him, as the Jews do, as not the
Messiah and not the Son of God.

In section II, A, 5, The Jewish People
and their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible states:

“Jewish
messianic expectation is not in vain...”

In section II, A, 7, The Jewish People
and their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible states:

“…to
read the Bible as Judaism does necessarily involves an implicit
acceptance of all its presuppositions, that is, the
full acceptance of what Judaism is, in particular, the authority of
its writings and rabbinic traditions, which exclude faith in
Jesus as Messiah and Son of God… Christians can and
ought to admit that the Jewish reading of the Bible is a
possible one…”

So,
according to this Vatican book, Christians can and ought to admit
that the Jewish position that Jesus is not the Son of God and the
prophesied Messiah is a possible one! The
preface for this totally heretical book was written by none other
than Joseph Ratzinger, the now Benedict XVI.

This is
antichrist!

1
John 2:22 – “... he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ?
He is antichrist…”

Heresy is a
rejection of a dogma of the Catholic Faith; apostasy is a rejection
of the entire Christian Faith. This book contains both heresy and
apostasy, fully endorsed by Benedict XVI.

Benedict
XVI teaches that Jesus doesn’t have to be seen as the Messiah

Benedict
XVI teaches the same denial of Jesus Christ in a number of his books:

Benedict
XVI, God and the World, 2000, p. 209: “It is of
course possible to read the Old Testament so that it is not directed
toward Christ; it does not point quite unequivocally to Christ.
And if Jews cannot see the promises as being fulfilled in him, this
is not just ill will on their part, but genuinely because of the
obscurity of the texts… There are perfectly good
reasons, then, for denying that the Old Testament refers to Christ
and for saying, No, that is not what he said. And there
are also good reasons for referring it to him – that is what
the dispute between Jews and Christians is about.”

Benedict XVI says that there are perfectly
good reasons for not believing that the Old Testament refers
to Christ as the prophesied Messiah. He says that the Old Testament
doesn’t point unequivocally to Our Lord as the Messiah. This is
another total denial of the Christian Faith.

What makes this apostasy all the more
outrageous is the fact that the New Testament is filled with passages
which declare that Our Lord is the fulfillment of Old Testament
prophecy. To quote just one passage of many, in John 5 Our
Lord specifically tells the Jews that what is written in the Old
Testament concerning Him will convict them.

John
5:39, 45-47 – “Search the scriptures, for you think in
them to have life everlasting; and the same are they that give
testimony of me… the one who will accuse you is
Moses, in whom you have placed your hope. For if you had believed
Moses, you would have believed me, because he wrote about me.”

But, according to Benedict XVI, all of these
Biblical declarations that Our Lord is the fulfillment of Old
Testament prophecies, including Our Lord’s own words, may be
false. According to Benedict XVI, the Jewish reading that Our Lord is
not the Messiah, not the Son of God, and not foretold in the
Old Testament, is possible and valid. This is totally heretical,
apostate and antichrist.

Benedict XVI also denies Jesus Christ in his
book Milestones:

Benedict
XVI, Milestones, 1998, pages 53-54: “I have ever more
come to the realization that Judaism… and
the Christian faith described in the New Testament are two
ways of appropriating Israel’s Scriptures, two ways that,
in the end, are both determined by the position one assumes with
regard to the figure of Jesus of Nazareth. The
Scripture we today call Old Testament is in itself open to both
ways…”

Benedict
XVI again declares that Scripture is open to holding the Jewish view
of Jesus, that Jesus is not the Son of God. This is precisely why
Benedict XVI repeatedly teaches the heresy that Jews don’t need
to believe in Christ for salvation.

Benedict
XVI, Zenit News story, Sept. 5, 2000: “[W]e are in
agreement that a Jew, and this is true for believers of other
religions, does not need to know or acknowledge Christ as the Son
of God in order to be saved…”

Benedict
XVI, God and the World, 2000, pages 150-151: “…their
[the Jews] No to Christ brings the Israelites into conflict with
the subsequent acts of God, but at the same time we know that they
are assured of the faithfulness of God. They are not excluded
from salvation…”

Copyright information: All videos and articles on our site are free to copy and share for free. Please remember to also include live links to the source of the information.
We are looking for translators who have the skill to make a good translation of important articles for the salvation of souls. We are also in need of translators who can translate Saint Bridget's Revelations into different languages. If you can help us on this important work, please contact us here.
We need your help! We are spending all the time our expenses among things like websites, webhotels, and giving away free material, dvds and books in order to warn people and tell them the truth. So if you like the material and want to help us—and be yourself a sharer—in saving souls, then please make a donation, pray for us and help us spread it in order to help our beloved brothers and sisters who have not found this information yet. If you have been graced by God with the means to do so, please support our work. Any donation that you can give is highly appreciated and much needed! Help us help our beloved brothers' and sisters' souls. Your Support Counts! All for the Glory of God and the salvation of souls! Please click here!
"And whosoever shall give to drink to one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, amen I say to you, he shall not lose his reward." Matthew 10:42