Last week, there was a lot of
media-hype here in India about a certain type of so-called sporting event.
It had to do with a young boy named Budhia Singh of Orissa, age four, yes,
four years only. And what was it that Budhia do that attracted so much
attention? He walked non-stop for seven hours, in hot blazing sun - in May,
the sun can be damn hot in India - covering a distance of sixty-five
kilometres. Budhia walked from the sacred town Puri to Bhuvaneshwar, the
State Capital.

Why on earth did Budhia do such a thing, instead of staying home, playing or
watching TV or whatever? Because his father wanted his young son to become
famous and have his name entered in the book of records. The foolish father
was egged on by many, including a coach and a local establishment that
compiles records - they and many others, obligingly supported the marathon
walk. For the Media of course this was a welcome break, a 'great' human
interest story, and a chance to lay off, at least for some time, from the
seedy and sleazy news they usually keep themselves busy with. Oh yes, there
were some rumblings from about half a dozen 'human right activists,' but on
the whole, the Media and a good section of the public seemed to have enjoyed
the 'show'. To be up to date, we must mention that the National Human Rights
Commission has just started enquiring into the whole affair. A panel of
doctors have examined the child and expressed grave concern. They say young
Budhia is undernourished, he is showing signs of stress, he may develop
early rheumatism and also suffer renal failure.

Let us stand back and reflect on the whole affair. Did the boy gain
anything? Absolutely not, except extreme exhaustion - what else can one
expect when a small kid, a mere four years old, is made to walk non-stop for
seven hours, a distance of 65 km, and that too in the hot sun? And you know
what? We see from the photo that appeared in the newspaper showing Budhia
approaching Bhuvaneshwar, that the child was not even wearing a cap!

Did the father gain anything? Perhaps he thought he did, but we wonder! The
reason we mention all this is to focus on the rapid diminishing of human
sensitivity. We do not wish to imply that sensitivity has altogether
vanished from the human race; no, it has not. We just have to recall what
happened at the time of the Tsunami, for example. Millions came forward to
help, as also various social organisations and Governments. Mercifully,
great calamities still produce a touching response in terms of aid and
support. By God's Grace, the spirit of the Good Samaritan is still alive, to
a substantial extent. However, when it comes to so-called 'routine and
normal' daily life, sensitivity often seems to take a back seat. Why is this
so, and is it desirable? That is the question we now wish to consider.

Few realise that sensitivity has everything to do with God and Divine
feelings. We often use the word compassion. Do we realise that if a person
is insensitive, that person cannot feel compassion? Here it is necessary to
refer to an incident, hardly known, that happened during the last days of
October 2000. One afternoon, Swami suddenly called all the teachers into the
Bhajan Hall of the Mandir and started speaking to them. He said that he had
recently read in the newspaper that a woman, unable to bear poverty and the
fact that she could not feed her children, threw them all into a well and
then committed suicide. When Swami was referring to this incident, His voice
became chocked and He almost broke down. This was a totally new experience
for many of those present, although they had been with Swami for years and
years. For them it raised many questions like: 'Swami often talks to us
about equanimity, and yet here He is, breaking down! What does that mean'?
Let us examine this question a bit.

Yes, God in human form HAS taught that man should treat pleasure and pain
with composure, equanimity, etc., and remain unaffected by them. And yet
here was God in human form, appearing to break down as ordinary mortals do.
Was He not contradicting His own teachings? Superficially, it might seem so
but let us consider another of His teachings ' My Life is My Message! So
what's the Message He was giving on this occasion' He was saying
effectively, 'O man, is you Heart soft like butter and does it melt when you
encounter suffering either by directly witnessing it or by hearing' Or is
your Heart hard like stone? Can you call yourself a human and let others cry
in anguish? Is it not your duty to go to the help of people in distress? Was
that not the lesson that Jesus taught through the famous parable of the Good
Samaritan'? On another occasion, Swami said: 'If you do not feel the call of
service at the sight of human distress, disease or injustice, how can you
muster the determination and dedication needed to serve the Unseen,
Inscrutable, and Mysterious God'?

If we take all these things together, then the message is loud and clear. We
cannot claim to truly love God, if we fail to see Him in all living beings,
and that includes of course fellow human beings. If we see God in others,
especially those who are in distress, then we would not remain quiet; we
would try and do at least something to relieve their pain. That really is
what sensitivity is all about.

The question arises: 'Why on earth are so many of us so insensitive'? Well,
if you want the answer in a nutshell, it is our intense preoccupation with
ourselves, our ambitions, our greed, our family, our this and our that. We
do concede that some amount of attachment is inevitable for humans, but an
excess of it.

Sensitivity is not always all about poverty, misery etc; there are many
dimensions to it. Sensitivity also concerns how we relate to blind and
handicapped people, how unwilling we are to hurt other people, how worried
we are about exploitation and cruelty, not only to humans but indeed to all
living beings; the list is long. When we look at the issue in a broader
perspective, we find that both individuals and the societies they live in
are constantly torn between two opposite forces. One force evokes goodness
from within, while the other force urges indifference and indeed even
selfishness. Thus, no one individual is completely heartless or totally
selfish; the same applies to communities, nations and societies. The issue
before us is: 'On the average, what is the current index of sensitivity?
Does it portend good for the future or bad?' Different people would
naturally have different perceptions, and we would like to place before you,
our view of things.

If you take a crowded country like India, generally speaking, we tend to be
quite indifferent to many of the problems that the underprivileged
experience. For example, we do not seem to be bothered too much about the
difficulties blind people face. In fact, some years ago, there was a most
disgraceful incident when, during a rally of blind people in a big city '
the rally was called to highlight many of the problems the blind face ' the
police carried out a lathi charge or a baton charge as they would say in the
West. Imagine that! Police beating blind people, who had come out to
highlight their problems and to protest!!

One can go on and on, but to be fair, it must be said that there are many,
many concerned people also. For example, some years ago, there was the
heart-warming story of a person who was working with spastic children, in
Bangalore we believe. All these children were confined to the wheel chair.
Yet, in spite of that handicap, they were motivated by this man to stage a
play, the Ramayana; and the wonder of it was, that the man who produced the
play was a Muslim. There are many such public-spirited people in this
country who are quite vigorous in championing the cause of the slum dweller,
tribals displaced by the construction of huge dams, and so on. But at the
end of the day, what matters most is what the average person feels, and how
sensitive the societies in which the person lives are.

In Japan, for example, the roads and
even railway stations are so well laid out that blind and handicapped people
can move fairly easily on sidewalks, get into trains etc., without anybody's
help. In America, there are any number of social groups that concern
themselves very seriously with problems of suicide, alcoholism, drug
addiction, depression, obesity etc., and go all out to help such people. Not
only that; they are very pro-active in highlighting the issues involved and
eliciting strong public support. And when there is strong public support,
the government of the day has to respond by enacting laws that help
handicapped and other people in substantial ways. Thus, if we are talking
about the 'average index of sensitivity' in a community, it depends to a
large extent on what the ordinary people feel about matters that ought to be
of concern. By and large, it would seem that in the 'advanced countries,'
there is greater social awareness about social problems and issues. In turn
this is reflected in the way those societies deal with such matters.

OK, all this is fine; but what has it got to do with Swami, His teachings
etc? That is what we would like to consider next. There are two things we
would like to mention as a preliminary. First is the line from the Gita
that Swami often quotes. In that quote, Krishna says, “My Divinity pervades
all and everything, and an aspect of My Divinity is to be found in all
living beings.” In practical terms, it means that Swami is in all. Next,
Swami says that recognising this immanent and latent Divinity within us,
each of us must see the world and deal with it, being fully conscious of the
Omnipresence of God. Let us examine what this means.

Let us start with a simple matter like greetings. When we greet a person, do
we recall what Swami has said about it? He says, if you offer respect to a
person, you are actually offering obeisance to the God within. Do we ever
bother to recall that? If we did, we would never dare to abuse another
person or speak rudely. For Swami has said that every abuse hurled at
another 'person/body' ends up reaching God. Do we want to do that?

So the first lesson is that when relating to 'others', be it through
feelings, thoughts, word or action, we must always remember that the
ultimate destination of all these is really the Omnipresent God.

In other words, we must constantly feel that we are always dealing with God,
though in worldly terms we might be dealing with Mr. X or Ms. Y. Once one is
saturated with this feeling always, many things would instantly change,
often without anybody spending one cent.

Just to highlight how important this matter is, let us take the issue of
prisoners. Every country has laws and those who violate laws are thrown into
prison. People seem to imagine that having laws, police, courts, and
prisons, takes care of the problem of law and order. Does it? Active work by
socially-conscious people has shown that it does not .

In Britain, for example, an expert Committee was alarmed to find that a huge
number of young people get imprisoned under the present system. In the
prison, these juveniles are often forced to live along with hardened
criminals, and that changes their entire outlook. Thus, when they come out,
they soon join the category of hardened criminals. The Committee asked: 'Is
this good?. Can we afford to make hardened criminals of young people? Should
not Society do something to use the prison term to steer these young people
so that when they come out, they live as good citizens and contribute to
Society? Even from a monetary point of view, which is better for Society? To
have more criminals and therefore more jails, security systems, etc., or
better citizens'?

What we have mentioned is but the tip of the iceberg. In today's complex
Society, there are millions of problems. However, if we think carefully,
almost every one of them can be solved through Love, Compassion and
Sensitivity. That is what Swami is telling us all the time, but are we
listening? That is the question we want to leave you with this Sunday!

See you again next week. Till then, may Swami be with you and take care of
you every single second.