John Smith is a pseudonym for the author who is a long-time Berkeley resident who attended the rally against hate near Crescent lawn on Sunday Aug. 27. He is known to Berkeleyside. We are making an exception to our commenting policy and giving the author anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the subject and due to the habit of some extremists to "dox" online those who express opinions they disagree with.

Sunday in Berkeley set out to become a solid public-relations victory for decent people. At least three gatherings of Berkeleyans opposed to white supremacy, fascism, Nazism, and all the rest of the filthy ideological trash that Trump is stirring up, massively outnumbered a handful of “alt-rightists” clustered in Civic Center park.

The Berkeley day was headed for an echo of Boston: a huge outpouring of opposition to fascism that swamped the extremist fringe and exposed how isolated, feeble, and contemptible it is. The day was poised for a major fascist fizzle, a setback in public opinion that would be hard for the alt-right to recover from.

The Berkeley police, together with other departments, kept a tight cordon around the park, checking backpacks and confiscating possible missiles as if the event were a rock concert. So long as they did that, all was basically calm inside. A few minor scuffles were quickly put down.

And then came antifa.

A cohort of maybe a hundred black-clad men and women wearing masks, many carrying sticks, approached the park, ready to do battle. Police rules, widely publicized before the event, banned the wearing of face coverings except for religious reasons. Police rules also forbade carrying sticks. Yet, the mere appearance of this black-clad group, without any confrontation or effort to assert control, as if by prearrangement, the police dropped the rules, abandoned their access checkpoints, and surrendered control of the cordon.

Within minutes, the peaceful scene inside the park turned into a riot. Using black-bloc tactics the invaders bossed and pushed peaceful anti-fascist demonstrators out of the way, attacked some members of the press, and chased down the two or three right-wing demonstrators who remained in the park, ganging up on them like thugs and beating them, while cameras clicked. The next morning, the press, including the “liberal” San Francisco Chronicle, led off with a photo of masked goons clubbing down a white-haired elderly man. Another shot featured a crazed-looking masked agitator posing with a smoke bomb in front of a pair of photographers.

Antifa’s intervention turned a fascist fizzle into a major public-relations triumph for the “alt-right.” Without even turning out in any numbers, without any investment in planning, organizing, logistics, and the other costs of staging a rally, the fascist fringe scored an enormous media win. They looked to the world like the victims. Their grey-haired members were beat up by “leftist” goons. The press has a field day: Berkeley oppresses free speech with violence. Trump was right to condemn “both sides.” And so on. Breitbart and its ilk are celebrating. The day couldn’t have turned out better for the right wing if they had planned it.

Maybe they did. Many commentators have speculated that antifa harbors police provocateurs. Their job is to create violence and chaos that public opinion will blame on the left. They played a major role in wrecking Occupy in Oakland from within. Antifa’s actions in Berkeley yesterday are entirely consistent with a strategy to sabotage the broad anti-fascist opposition.

No doubt there are sincere participants in antifa who believe – however mistakenly – that street brawls are effective in stopping political movements. In these times of empty, boring rhetoric, it’s natural to yearn for the excitement, the testosterone rush, the high of physical confrontation. To talk seems shameful, to fight seems noble. Very understandable. Who hasn’t fantasized punching a fascist, or worse?

But where do the masks fit in to this picture? If fighting is so noble, why hide your face? If you believe in your cause, why conceal your identity? If you are so bold and brave, why are you too cowardly to show your face?

Wearing masks in political demonstrations has a long history in the United States. The covered face is an iconic part of a well-known political brand. Black masks, white hoods, same reasons for hiding, same intent to intimidate. Until antifa sheds its masks and shows its faces, it deserves the name Klantifa. Show your faces, Klantifa participants, so that we can identify the plainclothes cops in your ranks, the right-wing militia members who have no trouble infiltrating you, and the just plain goons and psychos who get off on beating people up.

Klantifa is not part of the left. Not even the “alt-left,” whatever that may be. They’re not anarchists, as the Chronicle labeled them Monday morning; Emma Goldman never wore a mask. Klantifa is a political tool of the neo-liberal corporate state, a direct descendant of Cointelpro and other covert counter-insurgency police operations.

People who think that beating up on fascist demonstrators stops fascism completely misread the rise of Nazism in Germany. The German people didn’t silently allow the Nazis to come to power. Strong Social-Democratic and Communist parties – much stronger than anything we have in the U.S. today – opposed the Nazi movement. Brawls between reds and brownshirts happened at every demonstration. The Nazis in Germany came to power in an election, because (among other things) public opinion tired of constant chaos and brawling and believed the Nazis would bring order. Much the same sentiments brought Reagan to power in California. Klantifa is part of the right-wing playbook to repeat those scenarios.

The point of demonstrations is to sway public opinion. Thousands of people in Berkeley came out to say that we oppose white supremacy and all the rest of the reactionary garbage that comes with it. That massive show of support could have had a powerful impact on public opinion nationwide, as did the demonstration the previous weekend in Boston. That victory was stolen from all of us who came out into the streets by the unprovoked actions of certain members of Klantifa, who obligingly enacted for the press the very stereotype of a violent “Left” that is so key to Trump’s post-Charlottesville narrative.

While Klantifa was the perpetrator, the assembled police were the enablers. One Berkeley police spokesperson was quoted as saying they felt “overwhelmed” by the group’s approach. That would be a laughable, pitiable statement if it weren’t so treacherous. Assembled at the scene, according to a Berkeley Police Department press release, were “law enforcement agencies throughout the region, including the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, the Oakland Police Department, the California Highway Patrol, the University of California Police Department, and Police Departments from the cities of Alameda, San Leandro, Hayward, Fremont, Union City, and Newark, and the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office.”

Eyewitness accounts, images, and later press estimates suggest that the police had on hand somewhere around four or five fully armed officers for each member of the black-masked contingent. And yet they abandoned their duties without the slightest effort to exercise control. They didn’t issue warnings, they didn’t block or surround the masked contingent or try to divert it. We’ve seen the BPD aggressively box in far larger crowds at other demonstrations in recent years. Not here. The absence of any effort to stop the bloc, the instant melting away of authority as the bloc approached, testify to a prior arrangement, a tactical understanding. The BPD and Sheriff Ahern’s office have some serious explaining to do.

Berkeleyside on Twitter

Get the headlines in your inbox

Most Commented

Klantifa is the perfect word to describe them. They are just the new Klan with black masks instead of white masks.

Down Lowbama

This Antifa-apologist, this brave leftist can’t even put his real name out there?

michael masley

FEEL-GOODY IVORY TOWERITES, SAFELY-PRIVILEGED SCOLDS CATCH BOTHSIDISM ‘VIOLENCE’ VIRUS.
Obviously Antifa is far south of perfect, but the clear & present THREAT of violence unexpectedly scared the SHIT outta one Chris Cantwell–you know, the Vice News “Alpha-Goon” bragging about how much violence he & his darkside toadies were prepared to unleash against innocents who are at least on definite occasions successfully defended by the effete-elite-reviled “Antifa”–shorter after his on-cam tirade, we were treated to a “terrified I’m going to be killed” coward C. Cantwell pleading for help on youtube. You see, the genteel “libtards” with their bobbing signs & noble sentiments–THIS is what the alt-right hopes for–a brazen march manifestly “free” of any significant threat of violence against THEM. Progressives are all-to-often squeamish about all forms of harsh confrontation. Who can forget the pathetic, enduringly fruitless spectacle of Obama repeatedly reaching so far across the aisle he’d fall on his face? to what avail? Republicans took it for what it was–a sign of weakness. Likely Trump wouldn’t be in office if dems were more known for some degree of tenacious political ferocity instead of weak-kneed accommodation, ginger “triangulation” and go-along-tuh-get-alongism. Sunshine patriots? please, fall by the wayside. Get out of the way! This is no time for cocktail-party politics. Yes, violence deserves condemnation, but ‘unilateral disarmament’? Alt-right, cowards that they are, would like nothing more. Cantwell was on the street to TERRIFY. NOT to BE terrified.

Let me get this straight. You hide the identity of the author to protect him from Doxing, who then proceeds to call people cowards for hiding their faces to protect themselves from Doxing. Nice hypocrisy there.

helen

Nothing these people do serves any purpose for the left, establishment or fringe. If anyone is sponsoring them ii has to be those who wanted Trump in office taking advantage of left wing fringe stupidity and delusions of revolutionary skill and liberal self denial regarding the smell of their own poop.
If that’s true, it was pure evil genius as even establishment liberals will never recover from publicly flirting with (and then making excuses for) actual terrorism rising up from a base they thought could be groomed for outrage while remaining under their control..

DarkStarCrashes

That’s quick, clever.

But it is yet another example of the (all too common these days) false equivalency fallacy.

lspanker

You might feel differently if you ever had people stalking and harassing you online, giving out your personal info, and encouraging people to come by your house, vandalize your property, and call up your employer. This happened to me back in the days of Usenet (if you’re old enough to remember what that was), so since then, I have always posted online under a ‘nym.