Later that day, Morgenstern posted a link to the tweet in the Boosterrific Forum. Because it is likely that Jurgens was referring to Booster Gold, I retweeted the message via @boosterrific. That was the last I expected to hear about that, at least until we had some new information. (Does "BG" stand for what we want it to? Why be coy about it? Why is he drawing it?) I was wrong.

Late Thursday night, CBR.com reposted the tweet on their site. I assumed that was because they were more starved for content than usual. The post, by Jim Johnson, adds nothing to the tweet that isn't visible from the original post. However, within hours of that post, multiple people reached out to me to say, "Have you seen this on CBR.com?" Yes, I had.

Before I rant a bit — it's my website, and I'll rant if I want to! — let me say that I don't want to discourage anyone from sending me anything that they think is Boosterrific, I really don't. I want your input, and I will always try to be polite and thankful for anything you send me.

But paying so much attention to a teasing tweet not because Dan Jurgens posted it on Twitter but because CBR reposted it? Really? CBR? A once-great website of comics journalism that lobotomized itself in a bid to become the BuzzFeed of comics/movie/television entertainment? At least when Megan Peters covered the tweet for ComicBook.com, she added some context! But CBR? "Hey, look! A thing!" Grr!

I know that I shouldn't be irritated. It's no one's fault but mine that I underestimated how excited Booster Gold fans would be that Dan Jurgens might actually be drawing the character again no matter what the medium or purpose. I should have immediately posted Jurgens' tweet here in the Boosterrific Blog on Wednesday. And I certainly can't expect anyone else to share my biases against CBR. For all of those oversights and failures, I apologize. I'll try to do better in the future.

TLDR: For some reason, Dan Jurgens told the world he is drawing something that starts with the initials "BG," and I didn't tell you. But don't worry, CBR.com has you covered.

Freytawposted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 11:20 AMWho cares about CBR ? :)The fact is, you just tell me about it! So because CBR just made a stupid news about it (that I haven't heard off), that means we can have hope no more?

The real news comes from Jurgens himself. So, yes, this is speculation and all, but, it's still nice to know... :)

SuperPatposted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 1:23 PMI suspect he's drawing BG for the variant cover for the Booster Gold/Flintstones Annual that's out in late March. Norm Rapmund also tweeted out a tiny snippet of the drawing, and they are both listed as the variant cover artists on DC's website. Still exciting!

Freytawposted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 1:37 PMAh, yes, you're right SuperPat, it could be that. A new variant to buy!

Ariel Justelposted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 2:30 PMNooooo... I was so excited about this :(If SuperPat is right (and all indicates that he's right) then I'm very dissapointed... :(

Boosterrific [Official Comment] posted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 3:32 PMFreytaw, I didn't post about it earlier because I didn't want to spread false hope or speculate wildly about what Jurgens was trying to tell us (like CBR did). See what happened to Ariel there? That's what I was trying to avoid: unjustified expectations meeting harsh reality.

The only reason I posted about it today was because of CBR's terrible "article" about it that pissed me off.

Tinuvialposted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 10:22 PMI agree, the tweet is really too vague to be definitive one way or the other. Also, as SuperPat pointed out, it could be for the crossover/Elseworlds thing going on. It could even be none of the above, but more a fan art commission or some such thing.

In other words, Boosterrific, I support your decision to keep quiet until you had more information...or until someone else did something that ticked you off. (Hey, we've all been there, just keep trucking!)

Freytawposted on Feb. 13, 2017 at 10:58 PMBoosterrific, I completly understand why you didn't post about it earlier.

I'm just seeing the other side of the coin. I am pretty sure if you did, because you are not CBR or likewise, you would have put the good words in your article and broke the false hope before CBR (and likewise) made it happen (even for Ariel here, maybe ?).

Because you are totally right about CBR. And we all know here, that your are not like them.Either way, thanks to you, now we know we don't have to be too much excited about it, yet. ^^

Brady Kjposted on Feb. 20, 2017 at 10:48 PMIt's better than no news. It'll be nice to see a new Jurgens cover of Booster, at the very least.