Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

“German police has described a series of sexual assaults against women in Cologne on New Year’s Eve as ‘a completely new dimension of crime.'” Get used to it: you’re going to see much, much more of this “completely new dimension.” This is because the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. These Muslims in Cologne no doubt don’t think they have done anything wrong — these women, after all, are just Infidels.

BERLIN — German police has described a series of sexual assaults against women in Cologne on New Year’s Eve as “a completely new dimension of crime.”

Officers received numerous complaints from women who said they had been assaulted around Cologne’s main train station next to the western German city’s famous cathedral on the night from Thursday to Friday.

Cologne police chief Wolfgang Albers says witnesses described the assaults as coming from a group of up to 1,000 men whose appearance indicated they were of “Arab or North African origin.”

Some 60 criminal complaints have so far been filed, including one allegation of rape.

German news agency dpa quoted Albers telling reporters on Monday that it was “an intolerable situation that such crimes are committed in the middle of the city.”

”Don’t rape our Constitution by singling out Muslims for their religion rather than for their own actions.”

Your Constitution is not a suicide pact.

Where you make your mistake is in thinking that *muslims* think the action of rape is a crime. They don’t. It is sanctified for them both in the koran and hadith, and the actions of mohammed. This is not true of *any* other religion.

I wonder if it were *your* daughter, wife, girlfriend, someone you loved, being attacked by men who believe their ‘holy’ book sanctifies what they do, would you be so anxious not to ”single out muslims for their religion” ?

I suggest you read the koran, the hadith, the life of mohammed. There you will find, that for muslims, any actions against the filthy kufr (that’s all non-muslims) is perfectly halal.

Still want to refrain from singling them out because of their religion ?

So you’re fine with bringing in millions more people whose culture makes them particularly disposed to hostility and violence and whose ideology (aka “religion”) teaches them that infidels are to be subjugated and that infidel women are fair game — because we can’t “discriminate,” can we?

The trends in Europe over the past couple of decades make it abundantly clear that the larger the Muslim population, the more menace and insecurity for everyone else. Saying “We’ll just prosecute the criminals after they’ve committed their crimes” is not a sane response to the problem. The sane response is to stop importing more of the culture that breeds criminality and violence.

Without a substantial Muslim population, there would have been not mass attack in Cologne;and no sex-grooming gangs in Britain; there would be no rape epidemic in Scandinavia; there would be less risk of terrorism; etc.

Civilized countries have no moral obligation to welcome people who will destroy them. In fact, their governments have a moral duty to keep such people out.

Since when has this amendment protected rape, murder, slavery and genocide committed against other religions? It does not, so drop your sanctimony, and start blushing over your stupidity. Oh, by the way, muslims are the ones who will kill to end the first amendment, so hang on to the second one.

“Mainline Christians pick and choose what teachings of the Bible they will follow. Many Muslims do the same with the Koran.”

Those ‘christians’ who pick and choose, are usually best described as so-called christians. The ones who embraced slavery, child killing, and various other crimes. They tend to be the least informed about Christianity, and are merely hypocrites.

“Prosecute rapists. Don’t rape our Constitution by singling out Muslims for their religion rather than for their own actions.”

If the so-called religion sanctifies and encourages rape, which islam does, then islam and those who follow and protect it, ARE guilty of the crimes committed in its name, following its dictates. You are extremely arrogant, as well as staggeringly ignorant.

Mirren10 – Erm, no. Christ warned people not to think he came to change the laws of Moses or the prophets. The only things “new” about Christ was that he pronounced that salvation was only for those who worshiped him, and that he’d be back one day to damn all those who didn’t.

One of the things that made the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment possible was the overwhelmingly Protestant character of the United States at its founding. Further, one of the less appreciated aspects of the Great Awakening of the 1750’s is that it represented Episcopalians, Congregationalists, and Presbyterians (with the non-English Reformed such as Dutch, Germans, and Hugeunots) basically declaring peace on each other in the name of the more central aspects of the Gospel (matters dealing with the person and work of Jesus Christ and the subjective appropriation of grace). As for the Jewish presence, there is a large overlap between Jewish and Christian ethical teaching. As for the deists/Unitarians, they remained very biblically oriented well into the 19th century, wrestling with every jot and tittle of Paul and Isaiah no less than others. Perhaps the largest issue was Roman Catholicism, given its allegiance to a foreign potentate–and certainly anti-Catholicism was a vigorous part of American life for a very long time. But even in the case of Roman Catholicism, there was a lot on which Roman Catholics and the Protestant majority could agree.

If we had a large number of Muslims or practitioners of certain pre-Christian paganisms, I strongly suspect there would have been a general wariness about adopting the Establishment Clause. The issues would certainly have been Islam’s use of jihad and the pre-modern pagans’ use of occasional human sacrifice.

The arrival of a large Muslim population in the Western World is therefore not merely a challenge to the constitutional order in place since the early 19th century, but also a constitutional crisis in that it introduces a community that does not share the common values envisioned by most western constitutions.

@Alexandra Pierce, so as I understand your post, you wrote, “the laws of Moses” condone rape and slavery? Could expand on this novel allegation? Which of the 613 laws of Moses, laws do such a thing? This should be most educational?

@don vito – Yes, I said that Christ warned people not to think his arrival changed any of the laws of “Moses and the prophets.” The commands still stood, including the regulations laid out in Exodus and Leviticus regarding whom you could enslave and even how badly you could beat them.. Moses himself told his fellow tribesmen to take sex slaves in Numbers. At no point in the bible is slavery condemned, not even by Christ. The only thing he ever said about slavery was to command slaves to be obedient to their masters, event the cruel ones, as suffering in meekness is pleasing to Yahweh .As for rape (as if sex slavery isn’t rape), I suggest you look over Deuteronomy and Leviticus, in which, for example, it’s commanded that a rape victim is to be stoned to death if she is raped in a city, because, gee, she’s supposed to cry out if she’s being raped, and no one saved her so she must not have cried out and must have been willing (then it’s totally okay to stone her! Woo-hoo!) In the country she might be spared – unless, of course, she’s unmarried, in which case she’s to be shuffled off in marriage to her rapist. And let’s not even get started with the examples of rape condoned, suggested, and perpetrated by people whom devotees of Abrahamic faiths are supposed to admire.

Christ said He did not come to overturn the covenant, and that not one iota of it would be changed or removed until all was fulfilled. He also said He did come to fulfill the covenant, and He did. He instituted a new and everlasting covenant for all men.
Thus, the old covenant is fulfilled, and no longer in force. Cherry picking obscures the meanings, often people do so for just such purpose. Perhaps you are one of them.

@Rev g – The “covenant” isn’t fulfilled until his second coming, according to many contemporary Christians of various Protestant denominations. You’re cherry-picking as much as they are. I’m not. I simply pointed out that in no way, shape or form does the bible condemn slavery or rape. It condones and encourages it. You’re just engaging in apologetics and interpretation, and even by your own interpretation, Christ, he of the “new covenant,” approves of slavery. Deal.

When Christians say Islam is worse, I agree. When they say Christ is a better character than Muhammad, I agree. When they’re being slaughtered en masse by genocidal Islamists, I get pissed and take action. When they say “our holy book is better than their holy book,” I call BS. It’s no better. The only difference is that you guys have managed (by way of apologetics and splitting and cherry picking) to transcend your bloody book, and Islamists haven’t transcended theirs. Yet.

Read the gospels. Christ instituted a new covenant. His last words on the cross.. ” it is finished”, He fulfilled the old covenant. No cherry picking required.
I can understand someone arguing that the resurrection was the fulfillment, but it is a moot argument.

I can’t find anything, even in the OT, encouraging rape. You are the one twisting things.
Also, even OT references to slavery are quite different from quranic references. Again, read the source material. You don’t know what you are talking about, unless your false equities are deliberate.http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/201104/201104_108_NT_slavery.cfm

Alexandra Pierce- even the New Testament contains two passages showing how slaves should obey their earthly masters “with deep respect and fear” and should “serve them sincerely as they serve Christ.” The bible is NOT better than the qur’an. They both promote slavery, rape, sexism, homophobia, hostility against “non believers,” etc. In fact, Muslims draw parallels and try to establish solidarity with Christians in their persecution of gay people, for instance. However, Christians of today are generally better than Muslims overall in terms of their evolution on human rights issues and a realization that religious practice should be a private matter and not something to be imposed over the heads of unwilling citizens.

So what does the NT say to slave owners regarding treatment of slaves? Your failure to address that half of equation is indicative of the outlandish nature of your claim. You are either a shill for islam, or you never actually read the texts you are discussing.

@Alexandra Pierce, each and every one of the 613 laws of Moses has a number so that they may be easily identified. I had hoped that you would provide the number of the law to buttress your allegation, since you haven’t, and I do hope you will forgive me, I have taken the liberty of going to both Leviticus and Deuteronomy, as well as, Exodus. Much to my surprise not one number of the 613 said anything about condoning rape, however, there are many laws defining what unlawful sex is. If you would read from Deuteronomy 23:2 to 25:9 there are Mosaic laws the correspond to those scriptures numbering from 59 – 72. Also Deuteronomy 22: 25-27 finds a man who raped a woman was to be stoned and the woman was to be considered as innocent. Some times people quote Deuteronomy 31 is brought up, having to do with the treatment of women captured during war, from conquered nations. But if you read the passage, it says nothing about rape, let alone condoning it Rape would have violated Leviticus 15:16-18. Back to Deuteronomy 31, is there any indication that rape or sex was forced on captive women in this verse? Absolutely none. Sorry for the lengthy reply. My next reply to you will concern the other half of your allegation of slavery condoned in the bible.

@Alexandra Pierce, And now……to the condoning of slavery in the 613 laws of Moses.
condone, as defined, to pardon or overlook a fault or offence. If you agree with the definition, continue to read, thank you.
What is slavery? One definition is, the state of being a slave; bondage, also the practice or custom of holding a slave, if you agree please continue to read, thank you.
What is bondage? Bondage can be slavery, or captivity. If you agree, please continue to read, thank you.
What is captivity? One definition of captivity is a prisoner; especially a prisoner of war. A second definition, of captivity, is made or held a prisoner. I will use this second definition of captivity, if you agree continue to read, thank you.

Does slavery = bondage = captivity? If so, do the 613 laws of Moses, condone slavery = bondage = captivity? If you can find one of the 613 that does, please alert me to it, because I can find one law that does.

Why am I being so anal in examining this topic? If it were true that the 613 laws of Moses, condone captivity, I should want to know.
If by condone you mean the word slavery is written in, the 613 laws of Moses, or an absence of obvious condemnation of slavery = bondage = captivity, is missing in the 613 laws of Moses, You may have a point, but I would point out that the 613 laws of Moses, mitigate slavery = bondage = captivity. By mitigating slavery = bondage = captivity, the 613 laws of Moses, then there is no pardon or overlooking a fault or offence, just the opposite, the 613 laws of Moses seeks to limit slavery = bondage = captivity. Limiting is not condoning.
Let us, in this quest, focus for the moment on the use of the word slavery. I posit that the word slavery, although used throughout the 613 laws of Moses, in the modern western sense of the meaning of slavery, is not conveying the biblical sense of the word slavery.

If there is a difference, what is it/what are they?
1) the first difference.
Slavery defined in the modern western sense is made of racial bondage the west acquired through interaction with moslem slave traders in west Africa. As Europeans ( principally Portuguese ) sailed into west Africa and bought Africans the moslems had kidnaped, from the moslems, this began the transatlantic slave trade.
2) the second difference.
Moslems raided the coasts of Europe seeking plunder and booty, as part of their religious right, also kidnaping people to sell in their slave markets in Dar al Islam, the caliphate.
3) the third difference.
The memory of Roman history and it’s treatment of captives, within it’s borders. As well as other empires of the Europe and the middle East, and the treatment of subjugated people. There was no hope of eventual liberty, freedom, or justice. I am reminded of the part Spartacus played in Roman history. The Helots of Sparta also come to mind. Whole nations could be enslaved, and any children born into this slavery, were slaves.
The 3 points above were a form of slavery called chattel slavery. Does any of this reflect accurately on the 613 laws of Moses view of “slavery”? To summarize, the western idea that is encompassed in the word slavery, incorporates racial bondage, moslem captivity, Roman and other empires of history chattel slavery. If you agree with what I wrote continue to read, thank you.

Keeping the differences mentioned above, in mind, I want to move to the word we use, that says the 613 laws of Moses condone, slavery. As you know, the word we use, slavery, is a translation of Hebrew. I have already explained the baggage the word carries in the west. The English word slavery is used to cover a wide disparate range of meanings in the 613 laws of Moses, when saying condones slavery, let us be sure that condoning slavery (the western sense) is what the 613 laws of Moses does. For example, in many instances when the English translation word slavery is used, the Hebrew word used is ebed. So is slave the correct word to use every time the Hebrew word ebed is translated into English. Other English words might be a better translation than slavery. I shall touch on this a little bit, shortly, with a few examples. For more on this you can go to bibleapologetic.wordpress.com/slavery in the bible. subheading, slavery in the bible, slavery in the law of Moses. ( sorry I can’t provide a direct link).
Now, on to a description of how a person becomes a “slave” in the 613 laws of Moses and compare that to the modern western concept of what slavery is.
When the children of Israel were in Egypt, how did they become slaves? They became Pharaohs. In essence the Hebrews were kidnaped, put into bondage, and held captive. Children born after slavery was imposed were also slaves. Pharaoh would not let them go voluntarily. This of course illustrates the slavery idea. But how did one become a slave in Ex., Deut., and Lev under the 613 laws of Moses? Let us look @ Deut. 15:12, “if a Hebrew is sold to you.” Is that Hebrew in bondage? Was that Hebrew born of a person already in bondage? If we assume yes, it would fit the modern western definition of slavery, but what if no? People will sell themselves into “slavery”? But why? Could it be to pay off debt or not to starve? This is where the 613 laws of Moses mitigates against slavery, bondage, and captivity by putting limits. This is not condoning slavery. If we look at Deut. 24:7 we read that “any one who sells another person, the person who sells him is to die”. That is not “condoning slavery = bondage = captivity.” Another mitigation is found in Ex. 21:16, “who ever steals a man, whether he sells him or is found in possession of him, shall be put to death.” Surely you can see that far from condoning slavery, the law is putting a limit on it. Death is the final state of being a slaver. Also, equating “slavery”, in Ex., Deut.,and Lev with the modern western concept of slavery, should not be done, because as I have quoted and through the quotes shown “slavery” in the western mind does not equal slavery in the laws of Moses, even though the same word is used the meanings are different.

Going back to racial slavery, moslems kidnaped or stole people, then sold them to other strangers ( European explorers). Clearly illegal under the book, chapter, and verse I have quoted above.

Perpetual slavery, such as being born into slavery means you are a slave, was not condoned by the 613 laws of Moses, because the “slave” had to be set free after 6 years, not only that they the person being released was to be given a share of the wealth the “slave” had helped to create. The just is no equality of meaning between the English word “slave used in the 613 laws of Moses and the meaning of slave used in the modern western sense. If you would like a more expansive explanation go to thethology of work.org/oldtestement/Deuteronomy, under the heading slavery. (Sorry no direct link).

Expanding further on the western concept of “slavery”, the phase, “chattel slavery” in western content vs bondservant in the 613 laws of Moses would be a good way to highlite the differences in concepts. I’m only introducing this topic as exposing the nonequality that exist between “slavery” in the 613 laws of Moses and modern western concept of slavery. They are not coequal, slavery in the western ideal is not the slavery of 613 laws of Moses.

Perhaps the information and argumentation I have so far provided may or maynot be enough for you. In answer to your challenge of condoning slavery in the 613 laws for Moses. If you wish to continue, I would be most happy to. This has been most exhilarating for me and eyeopening as well. To read and compare modern thought to ancient text quite educational. Thank you.

Mohammad was a pedophile. Muslims following the example of Mohammad, are therefore pedophiles. The obvious examples are child female genital mutilation, child brides and ownership of slaves. This is not a religion. This is a formula of reward for terror, There is no parallel in Christianity. Islam is rotten to the Koran.

Robert Waters, You are an apologist for rapists and murderers. Our constitution does not require us to commit suicide. Only a fool would think otherwise. We also have RICO laws here to protect us against organized crime. Is RICO against the constitution? RICO could easily be applied to Islam as it can be against the Sicilian Mafia. It was also completely constitutional to keep or enemies out of the US and to round them up here during WWII.

Good Muslims rape and kill infidels, just as Muhammad did 1,400 years ago and ISIS is doing now. It is not Muslim rapists, pedophiles, killers, and slave traders who are perverting Islam, it is the peaceful Muslims who are perverting Islam. IF the USA is going to survive, we need to stop all Muslim immigration and we can do that constitutionally.

Muslims are much more likely to commit terrorist acts in the USA than any other Americans, so it makes sense to greatly limit the number of Muslim immigrants, which we can do by stopping immigration from all Muslim countries, ending the visa lottery, cutting back on chain immigration, and taking no students from Muslim countries. All these steps are constitutional!

I agree completely…
all this wars there they did cause this … and THEY HAVE TO GET IT RIGHT IN THERE OWN COUNTRIES !…
.. is not a TRUE SOLUTION.. to let all this Muslims come to our western countries ! !! Just to crossing this “border” MAKES THEM NOT TO DIFFERENT “BEINGS” WITH DIFFERENT MIND-SETS !

THEY bring there “stone age slave” – “culture & believing” RELIGION BULLSHIT to as here and OVERFLOW as all in a short time….
Muslims are very stubborn because THEY get trained from 1. day on in this way !

And when it come to the “hard way and decision” … the “nicest muslim” will kill a “non=believer” !
THEY living still in there “Ancient (stone age like) Time ” !!

tHE RIGHT THING IS : the ” Islam World ” has FIRST to “come up” to a modern Civilization and THAN they come to here !

THERE WARS , caused from there OWN RELIGION Bullshit , is NOT OUR WAS
and NOT and NEVER OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO “FIX ” THIS !

GERMANY did such a damage to this whole “Western world ” with there stupidity shown just for there PUBLIC EGO to the world satisfying !

This what will come up from there… is by now DANGEROUS more as worry about another “World War” !

It needs not a 3. World War…. THIS ISLAMIC mission FROM Mohamed , (this mental possessive addicted sick man )
is just on the way to be accomplished !

and when not get stopped NOW .. we all will be soon forced to pray 5 times daily to “Allah” OR to die !!!

Damn People waked up here !

By the way , I never will understand HOW adult People in our technical age can believing in ANY OF ANY RELIGION NONSENSE still ? !

Even look back to Christianity , not much better.. in History !
and ALL of this Nonsense was made up from FEW People with possessive, profit greedy and controlling MINDS for there OWN EGOS , made them self to this “created gods” with fear using controlling masses brains with some made up “Over Beings ” and such bullshit !

USE YOUR OWN BRAINS AND MINDS AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR DECISIONS AND ACTIONS !

The First Amendment ensures that the State doesn’t support one or more religions in detriment of others. It does not – I repeat, DOES NOT – exempts any religion from criticism or scrutiny. When you talk about the First Amendment in the context of muslims sexually assaulting women, as their religion allows them to, you’re saying “don’t you dare do a f***ing thing, these guys are merely practicing their religion, and the State can’t punish them for that”.

“Mainline Christians pick and choose what teachings of the Bible they will follow. Many Muslims do the same with the Koran.”

Ah, the usual false equivalence. The Bible doesn’t command Christians to go and kill other people on the grounds of their religion. The quran does. Rest assured, a mainstream Christian abiding by the Bible instead of “picking and choosing” teachings won’t try to kill you. A mainstream muslim abiding by what the quran says will.

“Prosecute rapists.”

No one here suggested otherwise.

“Don’t rape our Constitution by singling out Muslims for their religion rather than for their own actions.”

First of all, stop raping the meaning of the word rape by using it to mean something else than what it actually means. By doing so you’re desensitizing people to its meaning and making it a trivial issue. Imagine how a victim of sexual assault would feel hearing you throwing that round so casually. I guess you’re more interested in protecting muslim rapists than in the well-being of their victims. How progressive…

Second, no one singled out muslims for their religion. They were judged by their actions, which are rooted in their religion, and there should be nothing wrong in pointing that out. Orthodox, mainstream islam not only allows but actually encourages muslims to rape non-muslim women.

The Muslims also have a Constitution. It’s called the Constitution of Medina. It says Muslims get preferential treatment and that their religion is the government. That’s incompatible with the U.S. Constitution. There can only be ONE government in a country. So I suggest those that want an Islamic theocracy, should go live in an Islamic theocracy and vacate the U.S.A. supporting a foreign government is treason. Technically treason incurs death by firing squad. I vote for anyone caught upholding or supporting Sharia law, should be immediately evicted from the U.S.A.

To Robert Waters
Anybody ever tell you that you’re insufferable?
In other words, what you take for reasoning is so skewed as to be outright dangerous.
The Truth is that you’re part of the problem: Islam is not a religion, and for you to go around and blabber lies is pretty childish. Islam is a Draconian Totalitarian political philosophy that feeds upon hate and to makes blood sacrifices for the sake of appeasing Ignorance.
Islam: a philosophy of life that allows old men to fondle young girls, even to kill them with the feeble excuse of an “Honor Killing”, with impunity.
Remember, Islam means “submission”.
OPOVV

It was cold last Thursday night in Cologne–even on New Year’s Eve, I doubt that many women were exactly scantily dressed.

There were *1000* ravening Muslims in the vicinity of the train station assaulting women–this makes it clear that is wasn’t a few random men “enticed” by the “party-hardy” mien of a few German women seeing in the new year. Clearly, these Mohammedans came down there specifically to assault Infidel women.

This blaming of the victims is appalling, in any case–a few years ago in Norway a university professor, Unni Wikan, said “Norwegian women must understand that we live in a multi-cultural society and adapt themselves to it”–that is, to “adapt” themselves to the Muslim desire to rape them.

Just a brief time on-line and you can see plenty of disdain,from so-called “moderate muslims”,for the way European women dress. It isn’t a great leap to then turn this disdain into dehumanizing actions.

You have to realize that for Muslims, *any* unislamically-dressed woman or girl is ‘naked’ and is by definition a slut / whore/ un-owned female, up for grabs by any mohammedan who thinks he can get away with it.

Depending on how the Muslim looks at things, she’s ‘naked’ if her *face* is showing; ‘naked’ if her ears/ neck/ arms above wrists/ head hair are visible. If she’s not wearing hijab of some kind, she’s ‘naked’, a slut and a whore, a filthy infidel c*nt.

If she doesn’t have a male mohammedan owner riding herd on her, she’s like a stray animal…there for the taking.

Muslims in Pakistan went into a Christian man’s house and dragged out his *thirteen-year-old daughter** at gunpoint…she was carted off to become the sex slave of the head mohammedan mobster in the area. The mobster declared that by raping her, and force-‘converting’ her to Islam, he was ‘purifying’ her…PUKE, SPIT.

And I’ll bet that little girl was *extremely* modestly dressed, by our standards. Just as I’ll BET that the little – as young as eight or nine – Yazidi and Christian girls who are being mercilessly raped (some of them so often and so brutally that they are **bleeding to death** from the injuries they sustain) by Islamic State jihadis, were all perfectly modestly dressed, by our standards, when they were grabbed and dragged away from their parents and stuffed into the slave-pens.

Pop-tart or Amishwoman, schoolgirl or nun or soccer mom, doesn’t make a *lick* of difference in mohammedan eyes…ALL infidel females are sluts by definition, qua non-Islamic.

The mohammedan female slave rag isn’t about modesty at all; it’s gang colours, it indicates that the female wearing it is the property of some member of the gang; any female *not* in ‘gang colours’ is fair game.

First thing police brass in Cologne said was that they were very concerned that this incident would give ammunition to right-wing critics of the immivasion. Hmmm….

Also claimed that the perps were not “recently arrived refugees”. Turns out these “folks” are all already known to police for various crimes ranging from robbery to assault and battery. They are from North Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia…) and have been in Germany for two years pending disposition of their claim for asylum. (Chances are they will never get deported, too many legal shenanigans available to them.)

Most German media (broadcast, print, online) imposed a media blackout, only after a social-media firestorm did most of them report the news.

German airwaves are full from morning to evening with happy talk about REFUGEES WELCOME, the brainwashing is all-pervasive. Dissenters are brutally punished by painting them as Nazis, prosecuting them for “incitement”, getting them fired from their jobs.

Chancellor Angela Merkel will get her reward, later this year, when the term of Ban Ki Moon as UN Secretary-General ends. She already has the OIC voting block sewn up.

Thank you very , very much Frau Merkel , for the RAPE OF EUROPE . Backlash will CERTAINLY follow , no doubt here . You and your anti-democratic clique are directly responsable for these sexual assaults ( and robberies ) and for the backlash you fear so much . The German people are NOT going to accept this , NO WAY ! Political Correctness Time is over Frau Merkel , as is your career ; again : no doubts here . Shame on you !

In theory, yes. But you would need a majority of parliamentarians. Impossible as the biggest faction in the parliament is Merkel’s CDU, and they cannot bring themselves to cut her down. Next biggest is SPD — the CDU’s coalition partner in government. They are to the left of the CDU and if anything more loyal to Merjel than her own CDU. Next, you have the two opposition parties in parliament: Greens and communists. Needless to say they love Merkel.

So, to conclude: no chance of a vote of no confidence passing.

German politicians are openly contemptuous of the people. They know they can get away with it because the voters are fat, dumb sheep who keep returning them to office at the polls.

Does Angela Merkel get any of this? Highly doubtful. She remains part of the problem and not part of a sane approach to the spiritual fascism which is Islam. A la Henry V, the sin upon her head and all those who think and act like she does.

Yep. Arab money.
She knows exactly what is going on. Which leader of a counry doesn’t know what happens in their country? They have access to intelligence we can only dream about.
She knows, she doesn’t care because she is implementing a plan for which she was paid.

You are correct. This is the case in the US for sure what with many calling Obama and his ilk incompetent, misinformed. and/or delusional they miss the point that these leaders know exactly what they are doing.

“Mother?” What a sickening perversion of that word to apply it to Merkel. By importing this mysogynistic Black Plague she is spitting in the face of all German women. One can only conclude that she hates all the women and girls of Germany.

Germans aren’t PRODUCING enough kids and the population at large is AGING. They want to believe that IMPORTING people will add REVENUE to the labor force and keep up their SOCIALISM. They are dependent on IMMIGRANTS for their ECONOMY to PAY their SOCIALISM BILLS.

Well, if they need extra people – who will have kids – they should be importing the Syrian and Iraqi CHRISTIANS. Only. No Muslims whatsoever. Barnabas Fund and others such as Sr Hatune (an indefatigable Syrian Catholic nun) who have been working with the minority Christian communities for many decades – and therefore know exactly who is who – would easily be able to identify lots of bona fide and genuinely deserving candidates for resettlement, who would be more than grateful; who would assimilate via the churches, and work hard, and celebrate freedom by having children (and bringing them up to love and be loyal to the country that gave them refuge). If they felt they needed more, they could offer visas to the Copts from Egypt.

All Germans here present – make noise! DEMAND that *only* bona fide Christians be accepted for refugee places from now on. Demand that the Muslims be STOPPED and SENT BACK, and that Syrian and Iraqi Christians be offered all available humanitarian/ refugee places. Go over to Barnabas Fund, find out about Operation Safe Havens – *only* the Poles are currently offering haven to Syrian Christians, qua Christians – and then tell your government, loud and clear, that you want them to get on board with *that*, instead of letting in hordes of ravening Mohammedan rapist-mobsters.

You’re absolutely right. Merkel doesn’t have a clue. The German MSM speaks of a new wave of organised crime, but it the same they say we don’t know yet whodunit. Don’t put refugees under general suspicion, that’s malarkey.This is not about refugees in general, Christians and Yezidis are welcome, but it’s against the religion of camel piss. As Robert put out rightly, it’s all in the Koran and the hadiths.Somebody called the muzzies rapefugees. I think that’s spot on.

This should not surprise–just look at the flood of rapes and sexual assaults in Scandinavian countries by Muslims. In Oslo, in fact, *every* stranger rape over the past five years has been committed *by Muslims*.

And yes–the specter of a mob of *1000* Muslim men preying on German women outside the cathedral and the train station in Cologne *is terrifying*.

And good German Infidels should form defense groups to safeguard the passage of women in the area if the police won’t do it.

N. F.
You underestimate the MSM and others.
Time magazine made Merkel person of the year 2015
Expect the UN to sing her praises and the Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded to her as was done with Obama and Yasser Arafat.

Even if it is finished, the damage is done.
How do they recover from this?
She has done her job, will take her money and live happily ever after. Unless, there happens to be a revolution and she pays with her life which I doubt very much will happen.

You would think that at some point in time someone in the main stream media would decide that they love their granddaughters more than their multi-culti ideology and expose some of this stuff. They’re inhuman.

Merkel doesn’t get it. You cannot integrate into secular Western societies peoples that come from muslim majority countries that have no tradition of respecting women.
During the much heralded “Arab spring” in Egypt as crowds protested in the streets, many young women joined in, and many were sexually assaulted and raped in those same crowds. In the eyes of muslim men, any woman out at night without a male family member is asking for it. This is the new reality Merkel has gifted the women of Germany.

I know I’m a broken record. Once again, the tyranny of polygamy mathematics: Each extra fertile wife taken means another rapacious sex-starved young military age man screwed by the system. He will have no wife or family because that chance was taken by another wealthier man. These guys are cannon fodder, who invaded 3 continents and are who are streaming into Europe today, looking for Obama’s invitation and dance card..

Have I mentioned this system causes inbreeding? Did you know genetic deformities of children is the hidden plague of Islam? Britain and Saudi Arabia are doing genetic counseling for newly married Pakistani couples to avoid anymore “crooked” babies abandoned on the streets of London.

They marry cousins/young nieces to avoid dissolution of family wealth. They make the girls cover themselves from head to toe so neighbors won’t realize they took a little girl-niece to save dowry money.

The sex-starved drones are marching into Europe with a carte blanche to rape women dressing “provocatively” i.e. normal Western apparel. Mr. Spencer has pointed out the strategy is called “hijrah”. It basically means these people will use the Golden Rule to infiltrate your nation and then multiply geometrically with polygamy, and gradually implement sharia law, dog-hatred and halal meat.

Canines protect women and children – that’s why moslems detest dogs. Moslems enslave women and children and murder their men. Islam is a dangerous.

Why is Deutschland committing suicide? Suicide, whether of a person or a nation is one of the worst sins. The Divine wants us to to be happy and healthy not suicidal. The Arab invasion of Europe (refugees/migrants) will lead the world into a black age from which it will take centuries to emerge.

Does nobody learn from history? Look at the irreparable damage done to Persia and South Asia by the Moslems. Act now before it is too late. Islamic slavery, (rape/inbreeding)will destroy the European race.
Priceless works of art will be destroyed as Islam forbids art.

The choice is either to get used to it, or to do something to end it. Is there another? Well, maybe another is for all women to cover up and do as the Mohammedans prescribe. So, one may choose from among three options, right?

And any non-dhimmified members of the German police and military need to start thinking creatively.

One word…Sting Ops.

Put out the bait.

Wait for the ravening mohammedan mob to attempt to seize the bait.

STRIKE, suddenly, with overwhelming force. (Make sure you have the riot squad and/ or military, mounted police, dog squad waiting in the wings).

Imagine, in a freezing German winter, a mohammedan mobster and his mates attack what they *think* is an unprotected German family (husband, young wife, teenage girls) or a young couple.

But then…WHAM! All of a sudden they (the mobster and all of his mates) are seized, turned upside down, shackled, stripped of all communications devices (so they can’t summon the insta-mob), and are…standing barefoot in the freezing street being strip-searched – right down to their under-daks – and sniffed all over by big black dogs that look like they’re just *itching* to take a good big juicy bite. And then they’re in the paddy-wagon. And then they are being informed that, on the basis of the video evidence of their behaviour toward what they *thought* were defenceless families or defenceless young women, *before* law enforcement interrupted them, their ‘refugee’ status has been cancelled; they will be doing a stint (closely-supervised) digging ditches, shovelling pig-sh*t or cleaning out dog-pens at the local animal shelter, and then they will be on a boat heading back to the Middle East. If Turkey or Yemen or Libya or Pakistan or wherever say they won’t take them, too bad…they’re going to be dropped off on the beach anyway, marked “Return To Sender”.

*Muslim* countries have no qualms forcing hordes of Mohammedan thugs onto the doorstep of non-Muslim countries, so…turn about is fair play.

That’s what should be happening, all over Europe. Sting ops, over and over until it sinks in that if even a finger is lifted against an Infidel family or couple or indivdual, the Mohammedan who lifts that finger will be out on his a*rse so fast he won’t even know it’s happening.

GuntherL : ethnic cleansing , shooting them would be fine aswell ? Mmm , I think I am going to use a few words that are taboo , but I’m going to do it nonetheless: Are you a national socialist Gunther ? Are you a racist Gunther ? Do you want all non-aryan people out of Germany and/or Europe Gunther ?

Police Chief? He sounds more like a tour guide, apologist and Mayor’s spokesperson all wrapped up into one. At no point does he say they responded to complaints and investigated at the scene and needed to call for back up because of the large number of middle eastern men. This buffoon sounds worthless. Now that Obama is going to make it tough to purchase weapons and our own police are afraid to get involved because of the DOJ, we’ve got problems too!

This goes back to migration. Immigration is not just about being compassionate but also about protection of the community and ASSIMILATION. Will these people assimilate?? Do they have a history of non assimilation in other countries? Are they peaceful? Are they loyal abiding citizens?

A careful look at history will find that in countries such as India Muslims could not or wouldn’t assimilate so demanded AUTONOMY. And Pakistan was born and India segmented a bit.

Why did India allow them all to live and congregate in one area?

This is a mistake being made in the west now. Out of compassion they give them refuge then allow them all to congregate in one area to have their own schools shops etc and before you know they want AUTONOMY also.!!! NO! You go to Amefica or any country you assimilate and get along not.

England and Europe are typical of this scenario. Muslims with mob mentality is not a good thing so either don’t have them migrate or spread them thin so they can’t dominate and destroy a city or commit mass atrocities.

The factory where they demanded prayer times 5 times a day. It’s Emgland. They migrated there of their own free will. The west does not cater for prayers 5 times a day. If they want that they should have stayed at home not migrate then make a scene about human rights.

This is really disgusting. Centre of Cologne.
I have got an incident from there from June 2015.
Few weeks I was on bussiness trip. The incident happened at the end of pedestrian bridge of the railway bridge. Nearby to the Cathedral and railway station. A guy, visibly of north African or middle Eastern origin, took my bag of my shoulder. The bag, inside with T-shirt, snack and printed programm manual was not worth the trouble to solve the situation with police and I thought it was not wise to wear the bag only on one shoulder although the thief used violence to grab the bag and the sudden moment of stroke. Not comparable with pickpocketing.

Police Chief Wolfgang Albers quoted as saying, ” an intolerable situation that such crimes are committed in the middle of the city.” Where would you rather have them committed, Herr Police Chief? Is there a tolerable place in the city for the best of people to spin their magic?

‘Katja L’, 28, told Der Express: “When we came out of the station, we were very surprised by the group that met us there”. She said the group was “exclusively young foreign men”. Keeping close to her friends, they pressed on:

“We then walked through this group of men. There was an alley through [the men] which we walked through. Suddenly I felt a hand on my buttocks, then on my breasts, in the end, I was groped everywhere. It was a nightmare. Although we shouted and beat them, the guys did not stop. I was desperate and think I was touched around 100 times in the 200 metres.

“Fortunately I wore a jacket and trousers. a skirt would probably have been torn away from me”.

In my hometown 3 new housing areas are build for ” refugees ” – and our quarter is not serves with buses anymore cos that scum shot on bus drivers several times – means we must switch buses several times to come to our place !

Sheep were raped and killed on their lawns .

Merkel still ignores all this and let them stream in .

Am grateful that I can leave Europe … hope it’s not too late in 2 years 🙁

Sex-Meute auf
Frauen-Jagd in St. Pauli
Young girls bepöbelt, groped and robbed at New Year’s Eve
Merkel is mad and if the Germans want to protect their homeland they need to kick out this woman from office and then kick or kill the ones who have entered under the guise of “refugees”.

As an european I can testify this:; nothing can be done now to avoid what is coming. “Liberals” lead Europe to a point of no return. Ît is just a matter of time. Either Europe will colapse or it will change towards a less tolerant society. I will not be surprised to see nazi based parties winning elections and small (or not so small) civil wars happening in several countries. The future isn’t smilling. “Liberals” killed democracy. Ironic, isnt it?

Horrible thing to say but no sympathy with Germany because we warned about it all along. On one video, an immigrant said he came because he needed sex all the day!! and that was to a female reporter on TV!!
Immigrants are usually women and children not waves of healthy young men crossing countries borders and committing crimes on the way.
Germany is beyond repair, so is Europe.

The concern is that although it is a German problem for the time being but soon those men will be free to travel across Europe. Even if Immigration drops to zero, we already have more than enough to bring down Europe.

As a God-bless-King-Billy Protestant, I hold no candle for the Pope. But the thesis of this film clip should be rated PG–pure garbage. Neither the anti-jihad cause nor Protestantism needs such a piece of ignorant misinformation.

Also, the person who makes Augustine of Hippo responsible for destroying biblical manuscripts and raising up the Arabs to support the Pope knows neither Christian nor secular history. For one thing, read any of the major Protestant Reformers, and you’ll find Augustine quoted only second to the Bible. For another, Augustine of Hippo knew nothing of Arabs in the late 4th and early 5th centuries. In North Africa, the Arabs were conquerors and colonizers who arrived in the 7th century, not indigenous to the region.

Behind this film clip, I smell a typical 20th century heir of some 19th century vintage American backwoods semi-Pelagian Ranter who can’t understand that sinful man doesn’t need some massive conspiracy to wreak mischief, but that all kinds of sinners will do all sorts of sinful things. There’s no need for the Pope and the Muslims to be in cahoots for the Middle East and North Africa to be an Islamic slum surrounded by deserts and for Gospel-oriented Christians to find themselves persecuted.

I’ll take it a step further: these supposedly “Bible-believing” folks who push stuff like this film clip are probably more indebted to John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, and Sandy Campbell with their radical individualism than to any real Protestantism or the Bible.

The way the German media has tried to cover up this story is telling, and shameful. The way the police were unable to arrest more than 5 of the 1,000 men is also telling. What do you say now Angela “Time Person of the Year” Merkel?

Frau Merkel said that the perpetrators would be punished severely . Conveniently she doesn’t mention her own contribution to the situation of course . What an opportunistic creature she is ! Disgusting !

This is truly disgusting, how can you enter a country as an asylum seeker looking for a new life then go against the norms and values of that society. It is so sad, these Muslim men seriously need to be sent back to where they came from, who will want to help people like these? These so called muslim men who act so shamefully need to be tied down and sent back to where they came from. Seriously someone has to teach these people how to respect women, not just in words but in action as well. Women give birth to you, you filthy men, atleast learn to respect them!!! \

If these men do this to the women in the streets just think about how violently they must be treating the women in their lives, especially their wives, the kind of violence their wives have to face, the beatings, the rapes, the unfaithfulness!!!

Such Acts only escalate and fuel hate iand is completely unacceptable.

I wonder where the spirit of Germanic warriors went? Was it lost forever in WWII?. I don’t see how any country can simply bow down to this kind of intimidation and savagery without retaliation.

Come to think of it, the Nazi party rose to power as a result of the humiliation of the loss in WWI and the failure of their society to deal with problems that ensued. We may see a revival of nationalism that will lead to violence in the streets.

There is an intra vaginal “trap” that was developed for this very purpose. It has barbs that cause the penis to be caught and held, and is only removeable by special tools. Any tampering with it causes it to clamp tighter. The rapist fimds himself caught and in pain, withdraws, and runs off with it attatched to his penis. Eventually requires medical assistance to remove it. Police are called, rape proved. Send out hundreds of women armed with the anti-rape devices and lets catch the perps. No witnesses required for court except if defendant can find “girlfriend” to say it was an error.

Great idea in theory, however a male enraged by pain, or, in the case of Muslims, their buddies, are more than likely to just kill the woman. Unfortunately, there isn’t much literature available on the follow through to such device.

Get used to it Germany. This type of behavior has been going on in Sydney since the late 70s,by Muslim migrants Europe should learn from what has happened in Australia and avoid the same scenario. Merkel has betrayed your nation. Get rid of her!if she is allowed to continue with this cultural suicide of your country and the wider continent, she will go downin hhistory as more infamous than Hitler! Act now before it is too late.

What ought to happen – perhaps PEGIDA can organise it? or the White Rose Society, re-formed – is for *every* woman and girl who was attacked, in Cologne, in Stuttgart, in Hamburg, to record, in detail, right now while it’s fresh in her mind, a video testimony, and a written statement, of what happened, and who was doing it to her. If there was a rape, an assault, any physical sign of the attack, get a medical certificate.

And send **all of these witness/ victim statements** to 1/ the relevant police 2/ Merkel herself, and every other German politician. And demand ACTION, now!

Refuse to be silenced. Get all together and make noise, lots of noise. You need a megaphone to get through Merkel’s thick skull that she has **enabled sexual assault**. These rapes, these sexual assaults, gropings, threats, are **acts of war**. She is allowing German women to be victimised by what amounts to an invading and occupying army of Mohammedans. BE ANGRY.

The women should get angry, and Merkel should find herself with a huge crowd of angry German women – the victims, and not only the victims, all together, but their male and female friends and relatives – **right on her doorstep**. They should sit down there and refuse to go away (do it in relays) until something is done. Until every last one of the attackers is identified (from mobile phone footage, CCTV, etc), tracked down, and BOOTED OUT OF GERMANY BACK TO THE DAR AL ISLAM, and until all further Muslim entry into Germany is stopped.

“I am woman, hear me roar”.

Tell Merkel flatly that even one more mass assault like this – by mobs of Muslim men attacking infidel German women and girls and families and couples – is one. too. many,.

That you don’t intend to tolerate it. You won’t put up with it. And you won’t allow Germany to be gobbled up by the Dar al Islam. German women are free Infidel women and they should be able to REMAIN so.

There were not “1,000” gropers or rapists which is the number falsely being spread around.

If you actually read the German news sites there were a few dozen drunk men, around forty or sixty who were assaulting the women, IN a crowd of 1,000 OTHER MEN who were not involved in the sexual assaults.

A small part of the total crowd of 1,000 were sexually assaulting the women. It said men FROM the crowd of 1,000 groped the women, not that all 1,000 were groping them.

If the women were groped and assaulted by 1,000 men they would be hospitalized like Lara Logan was or even dead.

Did you have a bad Jews – Arabs did you get, you will continue to give them money through the NIF, through the common market, they understand that you love them – and continue to come, and this is just the beginning

The German government offered thair women, as fodder and pleasure places for their Radical Muslim invaders. They expect German Citizens to put up with these 7th century tragolidites, and pleasure them, without complaint. German citizens time to arm yourself and take out your idiot politicians, then Rid your country,of the Radical Muslim,rapist robbing, Garbage.

The cronulla riots in 2005,in Sydney, were a consequence of repeated gang rapes,harassment of kafir women and the bashing of a surf lifesaver who tried to stop a Muslim mob from tar getting vulnerable single females(children also)on the beach.the public had enough and revolted.Germany must do the same.

A. A
I read your artical e also the news from Nytimes and BBC. But nobody said that they are muslims . There are also non muslims in arabs and africans.
Please stop taling about like this and using the verses of Quran without context and explanation.
If you guys are Christian that you have to follow the way of Jesus Christ PBUH and do not insult and speaks bad about any other religion instead of speaking about the persons who did this. Jesus teaches you love then why are you creating hate inside the religions against eachother.
If you are not following Jesus then you are not even Christian.
May Allah bless all . Ameen !!!

“But nobody said that they are muslims . There are also non muslims in arabs and africans.”

Christians aren’t known for steaming (not related to cooking, what brazilian refer to as “arrastão”) and mass sexual assaults on women. Muslims, on the other hand…

“Please stop taling about like this and using the verses of Quran without context and explanation.”

How about you explain why he’s wrong by providing the context and explanation rather than telling him to shut up?

“If you guys are Christian that you have to follow the way of Jesus Christ PBUH and do not insult and speaks bad about any other religio”

Where in the Bible says that? Please provide the passages mandating so, coupled with the necessary context and explanation.

“instead of speaking about the persons who did this. Jesus teaches you love then why are you creating hate inside the religions against eachother.”

Buddy, you have no idea what Jesus taught. Moneylenders and temple, does that ring a bell? Despite what your lying book and traditions tell you, Christians aren’t ordered to lower their head and do nothing in the face of people who attack them or make a mockery of their religion.

“If you are not following Jesus then you are not even Christian.”

That’s not for you to decide, seeing how you have no idea of what the Bible says in the first place.

German capitalists and industrialists think they have a cheap reserve army of labour in the Muslim immigrants and over a time they can discipline them but immediately they will find a cheap work force. Perhaps that is why they have manipulated to influence all major parties to acquiesce in allowing lakhs of immigrants in the guise of Syrian refugees?

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer. in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.