Galley Boys are slop on top of a so-so burger and a bun you coulde get from a Covneninet food mart generic pack. They the Antoine Joubert of burgers; soft, sloppy, oozing grease and cheap sauce and extremely overrated by a biased fan base. Proof that if you throw enough cheap sauce shit on a burger you still can't overcome the lame burger. -JB

peeker643 wrote:Well, I clearly remember some guys being edging thrilled with ging up to get TRich ( THEY WANTED HIM!!!!) and Weeds. So I'm just gonna sit back and watch for a few days. And enjoy the back pedaling and rationalization.

Go at it, boys!

Enjoy!!!

Sometimes people are wrong. Sometimes people change their minds. Who gives a fuck?

Ha! Not me.

I only had to hear shit for a year about it. Hear about draft profiles and other such horseshit. From people who wanna make cracks about draft profiles and other such inane crap.

Love getting 'the guy they wanted and moved up for' an the gunslinger.

No idea why anyone would give a fuck. No idea why anyone would feel like saying," Hey, where are the fucking dipshits who loved those moves?"

But I digress.

Good Lord, get a room with Soul Dawg & grudge on. Just remember that every voodoo doll of me u buy on line a cut goes to me.

Turns out that Weeds blows, TRich is average. You win. Huzzah & hosannah to the highest. you hit a few draft dork web sites & regurgitated enough of it when slow at work and you're now all mad for being right? Christ you act like you actually scouted or did something that was your original work & slapped some poseur articles out of it like it was ur work. Glossed yourself a. "Draft expert" before you got ur balls busted & then edited the headline. Regardless of the outcome it was goofy and beneath you cause I know you & that aint you. You're just one of us with a take or two.

when you're a Browns fan and you try to be optimistic you get it broken off. Onto the next one. Maybe Ill learn.

Sincerely the dipshit that believed enough to love the moves.

I was wrong.I was wrong.I was wrong.

That enough pounds or you want more?

Thank you JB. Lacked a bit in sincerity but I won't push it.

Ya know what's funny is that it seems often times the kid that actually went over the notes before the test scored better than the kids that didn't.

Even if they weren't his notes.

If only the notes on prospective NFL draftees weren't locked away and so hard to find.

Their <shudder> Plan is becoming clear. '13 was a focus on the D. Draft and FA was heavily focused on that side of the ball. Our front seven is vastly improved and playing at a high level. Obviously, some holes to fill still.

This offseason will focus on the O. We'll get our QB and I expect our FA $s to be dedicated to the offense in order. Some big names at WR to hit FA this offseason.

peeker643 wrote:Well, I clearly remember some guys being edging thrilled with ging up to get TRich ( THEY WANTED HIM!!!!) and Weeds. So I'm just gonna sit back and watch for a few days. And enjoy the back pedaling and rationalization.

Go at it, boys!

Enjoy!!!

Sometimes people are wrong. Sometimes people change their minds. Who gives a fuck?

Ha! Not me.

I only had to hear shit for a year about it. Hear about draft profiles and other such horseshit. From people who wanna make cracks about draft profiles and other such inane crap.

Love getting 'the guy they wanted and moved up for' an the gunslinger.

No idea why anyone would give a fuck. No idea why anyone would feel like saying," Hey, where are the fucking dipshits who loved those moves?"

But I digress.

Good Lord, get a room with Soul Dawg & grudge on. Just remember that every voodoo doll of me u buy on line a cut goes to me.

Turns out that Weeds blows, TRich is average. You win. Huzzah & hosannah to the highest. you hit a few draft dork web sites & regurgitated enough of it when slow at work and you're now all mad for being right? Christ you act like you actually scouted or did something that was your original work & slapped some poseur articles out of it like it was ur work. Glossed yourself a. "Draft expert" before you got ur balls busted & then edited the headline. Regardless of the outcome it was goofy and beneath you cause I know you & that aint you. You're just one of us with a take or two.

when you're a Browns fan and you try to be optimistic you get it broken off. Onto the next one. Maybe Ill learn.

Sincerely the dipshit that believed enough to love the moves.

I was wrong.I was wrong.I was wrong.

That enough pounds or you want more?

Thank you JB. Lacked a bit in sincerity but I won't push it.

Ya know what's funny is that it seems often times the kid that actually went over the notes before the test scored better than the kids that didn't.

Even if they weren't his notes.

If only the notes on prospective NFL draftees weren't locked away and so hard to find.

I can't even afford the luxury of creating resentments in real life let alone this playground, so I'm ready to move on and accept the gloss of being the Larry David of TCF.

JacksonDysonJackson wrote:Their <shudder> Plan is becoming clear. '13 was a focus on the D. Draft and FA was heavily focused on that side of the ball. Our front seven is vastly improved and playing at a high level. Obviously, some holes to fill still.

This offseason will focus on the O. We'll get our QB and I expect our FA $s to be dedicated to the offense in order. Some big names at WR to hit FA this offseason.

JacksonDysonJackson wrote:Their <shudder> Plan is becoming clear. '13 was a focus on the D. Draft and FA was heavily focused on that side of the ball. Our front seven is vastly improved and playing at a high level. Obviously, some holes to fill still.

This offseason will focus on the O. We'll get our QB and I expect our FA $s to be dedicated to the offense in order. Some big names at WR to hit FA this offseason.

That's what I was thinking too. You can't come in and replace 18-20 starters in one year. A lot of fanatics thought we were going somewhere this season I guess.

jb wrote: Conditioner is better because it leaves the hair silky and smooth

Hikohadon wrote:Stop looking at me, swan.

Like Peeks knows anything about hair. But I guess he could read about it and regurgitate his opinion based upon what he read and then exalt in his resounding triumph when GQ announced that shampoo is indeed better.

jb wrote: Conditioner is better because it leaves the hair silky and smooth

Hikohadon wrote:Stop looking at me, swan.

Like Peeks knows anything about hair. But I guess he could read about it and regurgitate his opinion based upon what he read and then exalt in his resounding triumph when GQ announced that shampoo is indeed better.

I use plain, old soap/shower gel.

But I will read up and look at all the information. I will not just go 6 beers deep and swallow the first wad of goo the hometown team spurts out.... err the shamppo/conditioned maker spurts out, and take it as being implicitly the right move.

Ya know, I have to be able to see both sides of an issue when doing what I do all day. No lines in the sand as those lead to delay and conflict. And sht don't get better with time when it's built on conflict. It gets more expensive for everyone. I gotta find the good in our insureds and clients but I better be realistic about their warts and call a loser a loser when I see such a case.

I'm not upset with Weeden or TRich. They were always flawed and those picks were always fucking stupid and desperate and made by men who were stupid and desperate and who hadn't gotten much right up to that very point. I'm just disappointed in guys who should know better falling for the old banana in the tailpipe gag.

Again.

But I love ya both. You're my boys. Yoo're just a couple little gullible rascals. Always getting yourselves into adventures of the heart.

jb wrote: Conditioner is better because it leaves the hair silky and smooth

Hikohadon wrote:Stop looking at me, swan.

Like Peeks knows anything about hair. But I guess he could read about it and regurgitate his opinion based upon what he read and then exalt in his resounding triumph when GQ announced that shampoo is indeed better.

I use plain, old soap/shower gel.

But I will read up and look at all the information. I will not just go 6 beers deep and swallow the first wad of goo the hometown team spurts out.... err the shamppo/conditioned maker spurts out, and take it as being implicitly the right move.

Ya know, I have to be able to see both sides of an issue when doing what I do all day. No lines in the sand as those lead to delay and conflict. And sht don't get better with time when it's built on conflict. It gets more expensive for everyone. I gotta find the good in our insureds and clients but I better be realistic about their warts and call a loser a loser when I see such a case.

I'm not upset with Weeden or TRich. They were always flawed and those picks were always fucking stupid and desperate and made by men who were stupid and desperate and who hadn't gotten much right up to that very point. I'm just disappointed in guys who should know better falling for the old banana in the tailpipe gag.

Again.

But I love ya both. You're my boys. Yoo're just a couple little gullible rascals. Always getting yourselves into adventures of the heart.

I have no resentment, JB. I have fun.

This shit just don't mean much at the end of the day.

Maybe we can finally put this fruitless struggle to bed now that, you know, we were wrong. ; )

I still don't think Weeds or Richardson have been much worse than a lot of the guys that were reportedly options at the same spot - lotsa disappointments in there - but none of that matters anyway. It never mattered, it's just supposed to be fun to bs about it.

Dennis Manoloff ‏@dmansworld474 9mTrent says he's going to put a picture of @LullOnSports in his locker to serve as motivation. "The one where he's on his yacht, smiling"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!

I hope Trent makes the Pro Bowl now.

Joe Lull is a moron.

Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

jb wrote: Conditioner is better because it leaves the hair silky and smooth

Hikohadon wrote:Stop looking at me, swan.

Like Peeks knows anything about hair. But I guess he could read about it and regurgitate his opinion based upon what he read and then exalt in his resounding triumph when GQ announced that shampoo is indeed better.

I use plain, old soap/shower gel.

But I will read up and look at all the information. I will not just go 6 beers deep and swallow the first wad of goo the hometown team spurts out.... err the shamppo/conditioned maker spurts out, and take it as being implicitly the right move.

Ya know, I have to be able to see both sides of an issue when doing what I do all day. No lines in the sand as those lead to delay and conflict. And sht don't get better with time when it's built on conflict. It gets more expensive for everyone. I gotta find the good in our insureds and clients but I better be realistic about their warts and call a loser a loser when I see such a case.

I'm not upset with Weeden or TRich. They were always flawed and those picks were always fucking stupid and desperate and made by men who were stupid and desperate and who hadn't gotten much right up to that very point. I'm just disappointed in guys who should know better falling for the old banana in the tailpipe gag.

Again.

But I love ya both. You're my boys. Yoo're just a couple little gullible rascals. Always getting yourselves into adventures of the heart.

I have no resentment, JB. I have fun.

This shit just don't mean much at the end of the day.

I will not revisit 2012. i will not be sucked in like Michael Corleone. I do not have a pathological need to get in last word. I don't always have to be right. Really.... trying to convince myself.

I do have a pathological need to not be misunderstood.

In hindsight, one man's open mind with no lines drawn in the sand that reached immutable conclusion before one NFL pass is another man's closed mind of not even giving prospects a chance. Subjective, I know.

That, and a little perceived big in the britches ball busting from your brothers in stupidity for reasons covered up thread in the draft preview pieces best put to rest.

Having said that, I think this all went wheels off when I mistakenly posted something like "now that we have our QB" which was intended to be now that we have our QB prospect who could solve our issues there and Eye lost it and guffawed and hemmed and blasted. peeker rushed thru the breech.

T Rich fits and Weeden's best chance of being anything is Norv. I believe both those are true. Still.

I also believe they were also always bastard reaches of a failed regime that the new regime was willing to look at this year in the hopes they'd develop into solid players or great players. But they showed in games 1 and 2 that that one still couldn't throw a changeup and hit a back 20 yards open and one won't stop looking for Alabama-sized holes between Mack and Cousins or between Mack and Greco.

And then, one gets an owie and one draws a first round offer and that's all she wrote.

"So Joe Banner showed up at my door last night. He said he had a broken down team, and he needed more draft picks to get a good quarterback. I said it's about damn time! I've been asking for at least three different quarterbacks every year since 1999! When I asked him how many draft picks he needed, he said 'Bout Tree Fiddy."

Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 32mLast year, MH (then w/ Browns) offered to trade his ENTIRE 2012 draft to Indianapolis for the #1 overall pick (to take Andrew Luck).Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 34mMH on if he (as HC) and GM went in to owner to talk and they still traded Richardson: "I'd quit."Expand Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 36mMike Holmgren on Browns: "If I was the coach and someone came in and did that, [my response would be] 'OK. Fire me.'"Expand Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 37mMike Holmgren on Browns: "How do you make your team better by trading your best player? Your best offensive player."Expand Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 37mMike Holmgren: "After seeing the press conference, they aren't coming right out and saying it but they're preparing for next year."Expand Dave Softy Mahler ‏@Softykjr 38mMike Holmgren on trade: "When my daughter told me about it, I thought she was kidding. I didn't believe it. I had a lot of emotions."

Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.