(Dec. 14, 2009)  Without a doubt the most important and significant legal action in the United States this week, is Dr. Orly Taitzs Letter to Eric Holder, sent today, demanding that he institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama in the District Court of Washington, D.C..

The importance of this letter is the fact that the quo warranto provisions of the District of Columbia Code provide that a 3rd party may institute a quo warranto action if the U.S. Attorney General fails to respond within 3 months to his request.

Dr. Orly Taitz wrote Holder on March 1st. In her letter, published today at her website, she demands that either he take action himself, or that her plaintiffs be granted ex-relator status to proceed in the name of the United States of America, as the D.C. code allows.

Quo warranto is a legal action whereby a plaintiff formally demands proof that the holder of an office, holds it lawfully, and if he does not, is empowered by the court to remove him from it. The Code of the Disctrict of Columbia contains provisions for quo warranto, in such cases as the usurpation of any federal office exercised within the district. Quo warranto can be used against Barack Hussein Obama because he is not a natural born citizen, and thus does not enjoy the Constitutional immunities of that office.

Dr. Taitzs letter reads in full:

Dear Mr. Holder,

On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. The request was filed due to following troubling facts:

1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.

2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.

3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obamas short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.

4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates(currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.

5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of Hawaii and all the other vital records.

6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated.

7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.

8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.

So this article says that she wrote Holder on March 1st , as in ? March 1st 2009 ? ...... and he has 3 months to respond ? Let's see, that was 9 months ago, and he had until June to respond, so ? what's the hold up ( pardon the pun ) ... ??? Or did she mean, March 1st of 2010 ? ... can't be, March 1st of 2010 is not here yet...

51
posted on 12/15/2009 8:26:42 PM PST
by American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)

Thank you, I am relieved now, for a minute there I thought you were going to tell us that she ( or any lawyer who is taking up these cases ) does not have " Jurisdiction " and " Standing " under Quo Warranto in a D.C. court

53
posted on 12/15/2009 8:44:38 PM PST
by American Constitutionalist
(There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)

Why would the use a homosexual as a deep cover CIA agent, who could be blackmailed? He’s married and if he’s had affairs on his wife with men, that makes him someone who could be bought off. Doesn’t make sense.

There are several freepers who have stated that Ann Dunham's entire life story follows the typical course of someone working undercover for the CIA.

And that her son may have likely followed right in her footsteps.

Where is there any evidence that BHO is blackmailable due to his being gay? Do you consider Larry Sinclair to be a reliable credible source about anything?

Now, I haven't read any actual histories of any specific European intel agencies, but it was my general impression that many gay people held positions in them, both active in the field as spies and also back home in the office, so I'm unsure why you believe that being gay rules out working deep cover for an intel agency. I presume that there are many homosexuals and bisexuals currently employed by all of our intel agencies.

Does anyone know what specific work she did at AIPAC; was her position ever determined?

Also, she got her dental education in Israel, and then studied law on her own and passed the California bar exam without ever attending one day of law school, right?

Is Orly to this day still friends and associates with AIPAC, or is she even still employed there???

Anyone happen to know?

Speaking of BHO being a prime candidate for long term deep cover mole work for the CIA, doesn't Orly Taitz's general story look like someone who could be doing a favor, at the very least, for Mossad, and them doing a BIG FAV to BHO, making possible that all the documents submitted to U.S. courts are sooooooo screwy that the case never advances anywhere important??

I need to be flown in from England for my steak dinner. Could you book a suitable first class ticket?

No mention was made of travel expenses.

"DC ST" means District of Columbia Statutes, not the United States Code, so no steak dinner on me. Although if I get to London in the next few years, I'll be glad to meet for a pint, and meal of bangers, mashy peas, and spotted dick.

Even if the United States Constitution did not give Congress exclusive power to remove the President form office, which it does, you can't stretch the quo warranto provision of the DC Statutes into allowing the President of the United Staes to be removed from office, just because the White House is in DC, any more than you could use a provision of the Austin City Charter to remove the Governor of Texas from office, just because the Governor's mansion is in Austin.

“There are several freepers who have stated that Ann Dunham's entire life story follows the typical course of someone working undercover for the CIA.

“And that her son may have likely followed right in her footsteps.”

Obama, with his extensive lifelong Marxist associates, and his mother being a Communist enthusiast married to Pan-African Communist Obama Sr. would never have been recruited by the CIA.

I say this as someone who was interviewed and processed by the CIA for over a year with several interviews and extensive tests and security clearances. In the end, I was not hired, but at age 34 but I would have been over 35 when my class at The Farm was to begin and I like to think that age was the reason I was rejected at the last minute. The fact that my own mother was a Marxist activist didn't help!

On the other hand, Stanley Ann, as a US citizen civilian employee at the US Embassy in Jakarta, would have been a fine recruit for the KGB! The Dunham family's long association with KGB front groups in WA and HI could well have aided in setting this up.

12/16/2009 104 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: CLARIFYING ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS OF OCTOBER 29, 2009: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification 103[RECAP] regarding whether the October 29, 2009 Order was a dismissal with or without prejudice. The Courts dismissal of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint on October 29, 2009 was a dismissal without leave to amend and with prejudice. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 12/16/2009)

"Well.... unless that was a humor post, I wouldn't have hired you for a job at the CIA, either. Evidentally, you'd believe ANY cover story that any deep mole presented to the public."

Well there was that totally insignificant cocaine episode at a party that I confessed to anticipating the mandatory lie detector test, but it must have been just baby powder! Honest! I didn't even get a buzz off it! Besides, my date had a 40 inch chest and I didn't want to seem like a square to her. I was under duress. That's my story.

Enough with the true humor, now exactly what "deep mole" cover story am I believing that you consider to have not been verified repeatedly independently? Who would be the "deep mole", Obama or SADO in your view? Or both?

What is your definition of a deep mole? My definition is someone who infiltrates the enemy intelligence service bureaucracy from the inside such as KGB or CIA headquarters while being an asset of the other side.

Neither Obama nor SADO fit that definition, at least until Obama became POTUS, in which case he could be a deep mole for the KGB or other foreign service or entity (such as the Chicago Alinski Marxist cabal) but not of our own CIA.

You seem to think Obama and/or his mom were "deep moles" for the CIA! Does not compute! If Obama or SADO had been recruited by the CIA, they would have been tasked with recruiting (making traitors out of) foreign nationals on foreign soil. SADO might have been able to do that working under cover as an embassy employee, her but communist leanings were well known and confirmed by her friends as well as her marriage to Marxist BHO Sr.

Obama displays not a trace of foreign language ability, highly prized by the CIA, nor did he spend any significant time out of the country after age 10 (brief tourist visits don't count).

If Obama had been recruited for counter-espionage on US soil against Marxists, that would have been as an FBI agent, which handles that. The FBI would not have hired him until he completed law school, and Obama's unexplained years that might have allowed FBI training are prior to law school, not afterward.

The CIA recruits lots of people in HIGH SCHOOL, and then pays for their entire education.

If others are right in their suspicions that Stanley Ann was a CIA ooperative, how much easier for her son to get in. Spending time in foreign countries as a child would make it much easier for him to blend into other populations.

There is even some site, can't recall the name, it is SOMETHING-cafe, and a Chicagoan named Skolnec or Scholnick or something had an article posted there years ago about BHO getting arrested in Russia.

I believe that the reason we can't get his financial aid records from college is that he was on a full paid CIA "scholarship."

Psst. Judge Carter said the correct venue for this Quo Warranto was in DC.

Did he say that the President of the United States was subject to removal from office under the DC quo warranto statute? No. He just pointed out that, not being a judge for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, he had no jurisdiction over a case brought under the District of Columbia Code.

I do not believe that the CIA high school program was available when Obama was in school and it is not clandestine.

Currently, it is primarily designed to hire minority and disabled students on a work study basis with a combined SAT of only 1000 needed to qualify. The student is a full-time student during the academic year, but works full-time at CIA during the summer at CIA HQ. I believe the CIA is just trying to boost their minority and disabled diversity quotas with this program, not find folks for forward leaning intelligence activities.

From the CIA website:

“The Undergraduate Scholar Program was developed, in part, to assist minority and disabled students, but application is open to all students who meet the requirements. The program offers unmatched experience. You'll complete work sessions during each summer break, increasing your knowledge and job responsibilities while assisting intelligence professionals and applying your academic skills.

“We believe in challenging our Scholars with meaningful work that relates to their college major. An IT major, for example, might be given increasingly complex projects involving sophisticated computer systems. An engineering major might help produce a piece of state-of-the-art equipment. A finance major could be involved in developing and analyzing budgets for a worldwide operation. A foreign language major might be instrumental in translating documents for US policymakers. As a final example, a human resource major could have the opportunity to develop and implement personnel policies and procedures.”

“Once selected, you will be given an annual salary; an optional benefits package that includes health, dental and vision insurance, life insurance, and retirement; and up to $18,000 per calendar year for tuition, mandatory fees, books, and supplies. You'll be required to work at an Agency facility in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area during summer breaks and to maintain full-time college status during the school year with a minimum cumulative 3.0/4.0 GPA.”

Financial need as demonstrated by the household income ceiling up to $70,000 for a family of four, and $80,000 for a family of five or more

(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II  Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

(snip)
But not ONE member of Americas most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.

(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.

(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. Its the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.

(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.

(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.

(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..

A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obamas inelgibility:

Dr. Orly has put her lifes blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.

Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.

She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obamas inelgibility!

Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a mail order attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our great attorneys and patriots who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.

So lets get behind this great little Russian refugee and great American patriot.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots dont need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. Thats why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.

A: No. We do not reassign a Social Security number (SSN) after the number holder’s death. Even though we have issued over 415 million SSNs so far, and we assign about 5 and one-half million new numbers a year, the current numbering system will provide us with enough new numbers for several generations into the future with no changes in the numbering system.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.