Pursuit home

When the pain is the practitioner

A new study shows a small element of the chiropractic profession accounts for a worryingly high number of complaints, making it more complained about than either osteopathy or physiotherapy

By Cheryl Critchley, University of Melbourne

Share selection to:

Many Australians turn to their local chiropractor to deal with acute and chronic back pain.

A good chiropractor can help ease back pain and other musculoskeletal complaints. But a small element of the profession is attracting a worrying number of complaints.

A University of Melbourne study of chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists across Australia found that chiropractors attracted many more performance and conduct complaints.

The vast majority of chiropractors don’t attract complaints, but those that do attract a worryingly high number. Picture: Getty Images

The overall complaint rate for the three professions was eight complaints for every 1000 practitioners per year. The chiropractors’ rate (29 for every 1000 per year) was three times higher than osteopaths (10 for every 1000 per year) and six times higher than physiotherapists (five for every 1000 per year).

While the vast majority of chiropractors (92 per cent) were not subject to any complaints during the study period, a small number were named in multiple complaints. Just 1.3 percent of chiropractors accounted for more than a third (36 per cent) of all complaints within their profession.

Complaints Focus Regulatory Risk

Published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, the retrospective cohort study analysed all formal complaints about all registered chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists in Australia lodged with health regulators from 2011 to 2016 as part of a broader research partnership with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). Internationally, it is believed to be the first nationwide study comparing complaints data from these three professions, and was undertaken to explore areas of regulatory risk.

Overall, nearly half of the complaints about chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists (48 per cent) involved chiropractors, even though they made up less than one-sixth (14 per cent) of the workforce across the three professions.

Melbourne Medical School senior lecturer Dr Anna Ryan worked with Melbourne School of Population and Global Health research fellow Dr Lay San Too and Associate Professor Marie Bismark.

Dr Ryan says it is too early to explain the chiropractors’ results, as more detailed analysis is needed.

Male practitioners received more than twice as many complaints as female practitioners, even after adjusting for their age and the number of hours worked. This finding is consistent with previous research with doctors, which has found that male doctors are also at higher risk for complaints and malpractice claims compared with their female peers.

“Within the osteopathy profession, more than one quarter of complaints related to interpersonal boundaries or behaviour, such as rudeness or disrespect,” the researchers say in the paper.

“While absolute numbers are low, measures to monitor and address these areas are likely to be of importance to the osteopathic profession.”

Is private setting a factor?

Dr Ryan says more research is needed to understand the reasons for differences in complaints rates between these professions and important areas to explore include profession-specific therapeutic techniques, patient volume, group practice, interdisciplinary integration and evidence based care.

On a more positive note, she says we should also investigate why physiotherapy attracts relatively few complaints.

“It could be that there are models of care in place in physio care settings which are somehow protective against complaints,” she says.

“For example, when patients are treated by teams of professionals in a public health setting, rather than an individual in a private practice, does that improve the quality of care and make concerns less likely to arise?

“And if so, are there elements of that model which can be adapted in some way for private practice to achieve the same benefits for patients?”

Privacy Statement

The University of Melbourne (University) collects, uses, handles and discloses personal information in accordance with the Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Vic) (Act) and other applicable legislation.

This Privacy Statement relates only to the collection of personal information in relation to the Pursuit Website. Please refer to our Privacy Policy and Privacy Statement for the University of Melbourne Website for information in relation to the broader practices in relation to the collection, use handling and disclosure of personal information by the University.

Definition of Personal Information

“Personal information” is defined under the Act to mean information or an opinion (including information or an opinion forming part of a database), that is recorded in any form and whether true or not, about an individual whose identity is apparent, or can reasonably be ascertained, from the information or opinion, but does not include information of a kind to which the Health Records Act 2001(Vic) applies.

Collection of Personal Information by the University in relation to Pursuit

The University may collect, store and handle personal information about you including but not limited to your name and email address for the sole purpose of allowing you to subscribe to Pursuit’s weekly digest of cutting-edge research findings and expert commentary.

Disclosure of Personal Information

The University would seek your prior written consent before using your personal information for any purpose other than that which is described above and before disclosing your personal information to any third party.

Access to Your Personal Information

You can access any personal information the University holds about you by contacting the University’s Privacy Officer at privacy-officer@unimelb.edu.au.