I&#39;ve seen big guys whose modest amount of cum just seems to ooze out, and I&#39;ve seem less spectacularly hung dudes who shoot out huge gobs of spooge like a rifle. And vice versa. Since the cock is not part of the machinery that produces and ejects the semen, its size shouldn&#39;t affect the delivery.

I don&#39;t cum as much as girls think I would..."You don&#39;t cum a lot do you?"
However, since then I can cum quite a lot, although nothing special, about two teaspoons, maybe three on occasion (three squirts usually). Girls do tend to think the bigger your dick is the more you will cum, however that is not the case and I also have small balls, which could be a factor even though I read ball size has nothing to do with it and most men produce the same amount. Still I think if there&#39;s more there, you&#39;d get more out.

Also, I was thinking with a longer penis, it has a longer distance to travel and might lose momentum, of course that would only affect how far it could squirt, eventually all that was there would get out. Lots of smaller guys also seem to cum loads and shoot really far. I think the far shots are down to the power of their PC muscles and the shorter distance the cum has to travel.

I have seen a guy called Marc Ellin who has about 7" cock and large balls, he shoots the biggest loads I&#39;ve seen on the web. Really thick spunk, the first 10 shots arc out between about 3ft and a couple of inches and then several more that just run out. His total load is about 50 cls or 10 teaspoons. He shoots way bigger loads than Peter North.

>>who has about 7" cock and large balls, he shoots the biggest loads I&#39;ve seen on the web

I&#39;m right at 7" and shoot 6 to 9 shots on a normal-to-good day, sometimes more. Distance, has always been a measure of being turned on. My first few shots are always 3 to 5 feet and beyond... how many varies from 2 to 5, rarely more, the rest just spurt out a foot or two. For me, it&#39;s a measure of being turned on with regard to distance, I&#39;ve noticed that over the years.

North is pretty big and we all know his outcome... Jake Steed is another cat that only shoots 5 or so times, but his first couple have easily been in the 3 to 5 foot range.

I really don&#39;t think size has much to do with volume and distance. You have to figure that cum starts within your body... so an extra inch or two, or four for some of you shouldn&#39;t matter. In fact, thinking about a rifle vs a pistol... you have to figure the longer barrell should help or something (rocket scientists, please jump in)... or at least help the real long guys shoot straight ;-)

Gold Member

Originally posted by Kimahri@Jan 6 2005, 11:11 AMWell, after checking out Bruce&#39;s clip in the gallery, I have to say that his length has nothing to do with the amount he cums. That was truly impressive and humbling at the same time.

Gold Member

Originally posted by Herble+Jan 6 2005, 11:29 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Herble &#064; Jan 6 2005, 11:29 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Kimahri@Jan 6 2005, 11:11 AMWell, after checking out Bruce&#39;s clip in the gallery, I have to say that his length has nothing to do with the amount he cums.Â That was truly impressive and humbling at the same time.

In high school, it was "Puddles"... hated it. Written note by an ex-girlfriend to another girl using that as a description, word got out...

Then in college, it was "Tsunami" from a buddy who called me that, then proceeded to tell everyone why... which given the recent events... I can think of a few folk who thought of me. But under bad circumstances.

Originally posted by txquis@Jan 5 2005, 02:35 PMthat&#39;s how i got my nickname, "the soaker" :blush: