To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

Domestic dilemma : an evaluation of past, present, and future methods of state drug policy

Domestic dilemma : an evaluation of past, present, and future methods of state drug policy

Author

Foster, Zachary D.

Keywords

University of New Orleans. Honors thesis. 2002.; University of New Orleans. Dept. of Political Science.

Abstract/Introduction

This paper will examine current methods of drug control employed domestically in the United States, focusing on the efforts of individual states. Although most drug policy is laid out in Washington D.C., it is the states that determine which policies to use and to what extent. Because the overwhelming majority of drug offenders reside in state facilities, as opposed to federal, this paper will only examine policies used at the state level, and will avoid the issue of international drug control. In its examination of state drug policy, this paper will analyze methods of both drug enforcement and drug treatment. The study will be broken down into four sections.

Access

PDF access restricted to UNO campus only

Degree

B.A.

Degree Program

Political Science

Department

Department of Political Science

Thesis Advisor

Rosenblum, Marc R.

Advisory Committee

Prins, Brandon; Blanton, Linda Lonon

Date Degree Awarded

2002;

Rights

The University of New Orleans and its agents retain the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible this thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. The author retains all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis.

Notes

iii, 62 leaves ; 29 cm.; typescript; "An honors thesis ... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts, with University Honors and Honors in Political Science"; Thesis (B.A.)--University of New Orleans, 2002; Includes bibliographical references (leaves 52-53); May 2002; approved April 30, 2002.