Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

Even the most casual ‘follower’ of this case, the most
intriguing and baffling missing child case of all time, will know by now that
the chief ‘suspect’ in the abduction of the child has been eliminated.

His ‘elimination’ however, is far more bizarre and downright
DUBIOUS then his first emergence, seven YEARS ago.

According to McCann friend and fellow holiday-maker, Jane
Tanner, her sworn testimony asserts that she saw a man carrying a child away
from the McCann’s holiday apartment shortly before Kate McCann reported she had
discovered Madeleine missing.

It was THIS testimony alone that formed the basis of the
abduction theory, at least in the camp of ‘Team McCann’.

Innumerable column inches in newspaper stories, press
reports, as well as countless TV interviews, magazine articles, News broadcasts, breakfast
TV appearances, chat shows and even BOOKS, have all been given over in the
quest to search for and to identify this man whom the McCann’s, their friends,
allies,(and seemingly endless PR entourage), are quoted as stating they believe
was responsible for the abduction of Madeleine.

Of course, those who have followed this case more closely,
studying the available Portuguese and British police documents relating to the
matter will know that not everyone held quite as much faith in this ‘abductor’.

The Portuguese Polícia Judiciáriafor example,NEVER placed any
significance on Jane Tanner’s sighting for a number of reasons.

- It was FAR too dark at the time of the alleged sighting
for her to make any kind of description, especially given the distances
reportedly involved.

- Tanner, herself, (or on other occasions, ‘Team McCann’),
has modified or even completely CHANGED the description of the person she
states she saw:-height, build, dress,
colour, race and even on one occasion, SEX of this individual have all
been subject to alteration.

-Perhaps more significantly, at the precise TIME of this
alleged sighting two other witnesses, (one of which was Gerry McCann), were in
pretty much the exact same area and saw neither this ‘abductor’ NOR Jane Tanner
herself.

So the man who came to be known, variously, as ‘Egg Man’,
‘Bundleman’, ‘Swarthy-Man’,’'Gypsy-Man’ and a number of other monikers, was
truly a man of immense mystery indeed.

However, any mystery surrounding this, surely MOST WANTED, suspect pales into abject insignificance when
one considers the downright abstruseness surrounding his REAPPEARANCE!

For Scotland Yard’s finest announced, in October of last
year, that this MAN had, in fact, now come FORWARD to eliminate himself from
the inquiries by stating that it was HE whom Jane Tanner had observed, carrying
his OWN daughter!.

Not only did this man produce the self-same CLOTHES that he
had worn on the night in question, all those years ago, but astonishingly, (as
was reported in the PRESS), he even managed to produce his daughters’ “frilly
pyjamas” that SHE had been wearing that night also, that had allegedly led Jane
Tanner to think the girl was Madeleine!.

Of course, a CYNIC might want to know why this man had
remained completely incognito for over six years, despite endless, unavoidable
media coverage and countless appeals for information seeking to identify him.

A cynic would most definitely want to know how or why ANY
parent would be able to produce a pair of pyjamas, (or indeed ANY item of
clothing), belonging to a child who would clearly have outgrown them by six
years.

Alas, those questions are never going to be answered.

Not least because the man in question has NOT been
identified.

DCI Andy Redwood, the Met officer
leading the review of the case of the missing girl, described this astonishing turn of
events as a "revelation moment".

HOWEVER, to my mind, that’s
nowhere NEAR as revelational as the NEW suspect that we are now to centre our
attentions on, according to Scotland Yard, and as featured in the BBC TV
‘Crimewatch’ reconstruction.

THIS “new suspect”, a man seen
carrying a child in pyjamas “towards the ocean” is of course, the very
self-same man who had been previously witnessed and described by a family from IRELAND.

The very self-same man whose
e-fits had actually been drawn up in 2007.

The very-self same man who had
been identified to the McCann’s as "a very credible suspect" in 2008 by the McCann’s
own investigators, headed by former MI5 operatives.

The very self-same man whose existence
the McCann’s had sought to prevent being made public by taking LEGAL action ordering
the investigators not to disclose it......

Team McCann is reported as saying
that this information was suppressed as it “would havebeen completely distracting” if
made public, and that the McCann’s wanted to “focus on a man seen by one of
their friends” (Jane Tanner), and “it would have been too expensive to conduct
full investigations into both sightings”.

Presumably, the decision to
obscure this information was entirely unrelated to the fact that the chief
witness, Martin Smith, had later stated;- “I would be 60-80% sure that it
was Gerald McCann that I met that night carrying a child”.So here we are, almost SEVEN
years down the line, still searching for the truth.Searching amongst all the
suspects, as regularly paraded by the Media, for a glimmer of hope.A genuine clue. A tangible piece of evidence. A factual accuracy.Yet, amongst all the “swarthy
suspects”, the Romany Gypsies, the dead paedophiles, the Middle-East sex-rings,
the Moroccan gangsters, the ‘mysterious’ van full of cleaners, the now deceased
black tractor driver who was never convicted of an offence when he was alive,
the phantom sex-abuser who “liked young white girls”, the “gang of burglars”;
ALL are linked by one factor only:- That there is not a single iota
of evidence to support any of their involvement.ALL the above have been cited in
the media as being 'persons of interest' to the Scotland Yard investigation,
and whilst Redwood cannot be expected to generalise or elaborate, one would
think that he would at least have made a statement DENYING that they were in the
frame, were that not the case.So WHAT cost, precisely, the
truth?In a leaked letter from the HOME
office, in a response to information
requested by a Welsh MP, it gives the following figures, current as to FEBRUARY
of this year:-“The costs incurred by the
Metropolitan Police Service’s investigation, (operation Grange), so FAR, are £1,929,354
for 2011/12; £2,770,387 for 2012/13 and £1,254,705 for 2013/14.”That’s a CURRENT total of £5,954,446
up to 14th February of this year. On average, a running total of around
£2m per year. Until when? Who knows?What about the cost to the PORTUGUESE inquiry
into this case that allegedly almost “bankrupted” the Polícia Judiciária?How much spent
investigating the case by Private Detectives employed by the McCann’s?How much
spent on OTHER lines of inquiry funded by donations, sponsored events and high
profile business backers?

How much revenue raised via media deals, TV appearance fees, book deals and serialisation rights?How much in
public donations, given by people of all ages and means, in a quest to find the
truth surrounding what happened to the little girl?All amount to but
one unequivocal fact:-

That the
British TAX payer has spent almost six million pounds Sterling, (and RISING,
every day), to have Scotland Yard 'reveal' to us the ‘NEW’ suspect that the McCann’s
themselves spent a fortune and SIX years keeping HIDDENfrom us.