Opinion

From the critics

Community Activity

Comment

In the sequel to "The Case for Israel", the author makes a strong case that peace is possible between Israel and Palestine. He reviews Bill Clinton's proposal in 2000 that gave Arafat 95% of what he wanted but was still rejected. He discusses many of the sticking points, including the separation barrier, settlements, and how Palestine can be an effective country despite two exclavated units (the West Bank and Gaza). He heaps scorn on not just those who claim to be the "true" Palestinians, but also those who claim to be "more Israeli" - including some hyperactive televangelists who refuse to recognize Jews are still bound by their own covenant and don't have to cowtow to Jesus. He goes after the "boycott, divestment, sanctions" movement that has swept university campuses across the free world, and finally goes after his most avowed enemies, not the least of which is Noam Chomsky. Years after its publication, it's still the definitive book on the subject. And it mourns a lost opportunity - for even Prince Bandar told Arafat he made the biggest mistake of his life and his decision would only destabilize the Middle East further which is exactly what happened.