“The unified and perfected Jewish media machine can be utilised
for much more important tasks than fighting off holocaust jokes.
Its main goal is to bring us to the Brave New World, to the new
spiritless totalitarianism, while smaller tasks are incidental
to the great one.”

Satanic Pictures

(final version)

By Israel Shamir

The
West was not amused by burning embassies in Beirut and
elsewhere. “Them there Muslims do not understand our sense of
humour; they do not understand our idea of liberty”. - droned
the newspapers. Others condemned the tactless escapade of the
Danes but thought the reaction was quite out of proportion.
However the flare up was anything but incidental. [The picture
on the left: a burned embassy in Beirut].

A resourceful American journalist
Christopher Bollyn investigated the Danish Satanic Pictures
and their procurer, one Flemming Rose, and found out that Rose
was not an innocent lover of freedom of speech, neither was he
some quaint Scandinavian collector of smut pictures with
religious connotations who kept his presentations of the Muslim
prophet next to that of a Nun-with-the-Great Dane. Rose was a
devotee of the Zionist Neo-Con cult, and made a pilgrimage to
the pope of this persuasion -- Daniel Pipes, wrote Bollyn.

So far, so good. But the execrable Rose
peddled his stuff four months ago, and that's a long
time, as the media counts. The Muslims did not even notice his
effort, as possibly not many of them read the Jylland Pest.
Like a naughty child who multiplies
his effort when his well-prepared jibe
fails to annoy, eleven newspapers in seven countries republished
the pictures simultaneously. It was a show of hands: behind
various newspapers in various countries, beyond companies and
corporations, we were allowed to see the Enemy, the
Not-So-Hidden Hand, the player on the international scene across
all borders. It was a convincing show, and now we know: one
will, one design rules the world media empire.

Who organised it?

Who is the Enemy? Who can control media on
such a scale? Sandhya Jain, an important Indian journalist of
nationalist persuasion wrote: “The cartoons were an intentional
act of religious disrespect by political Christianity,
comprising the socio-economic-political elites of Europe and
America.” Christendom was called the culprit by many other
observers. But to be sure, the same people who offended Muslims
do not think twice before offending believing Christians – it is
enough to recall the Cross changing into a Swastika on the
posters of Amen, the movie, or the crucifix in a glass of
piss (an illustration to the Talmud?) in a Brooklyn [a heavily
Jewish suburb of New York] Museum. There is no religious enmity
between the Muslims and the Christians.
Ahmad Amr was right:

“The
defamatory portrayals of Islam and Mohammed by European ‘free
speech advocates’ puts Muslims at a distinct disadvantage. They
can’t very well retaliate by defaming Jesus Christ because they
revere him as much as they revere Mohammed and consider him a
prophet of God. Insulting Jesus or the Virgin Mary is considered
as blasphemous as insulting Mohammed. No true Muslim would ever
consider lampooning the Mother of Christ because they also
believe in the Immaculate Conception. In Islamic tradition, Mary
will be the first woman to enter heaven. And like the Koran,
Muslims consider both the Bible and the Torah holy texts.” [The
picture on the left: Islamic depiction of the Holy Virgin with
the Child from Istanbul]

Thus we have to exonerate Christians and look
elsewhere.

The Western media is the exclusive domain of
Judeophiles: you may have noticed it by their extensive and
morbid coverage of Sharon’s demise, of Jewish fatalities while
disregarding Palestinian deaths, of the Holocaust issue, of real
or imagined attacks on Jews[1].
The Jews have a vested interest in promoting anti-Muslim
sentiment, for it fits into their plans of subduing Palestinians
and dealing with Iran. (The Iranians immediately recognised it,
and turned to anti-Jewish holocaust jokes. Equally tasteless, it
was a reasonable tit-for-tat.) Indeed, just now the non-Zionist
World Jewish Congress officially kicked off his campaign against
Iran , Haaretz informed its readers. AIPAC plans a
Washington
conference titled “Now is the time to stop Iran”.
Kurt Nimmo correctly called the pictures “a deliberate
provocation designed to outrage and incite Muslims and thus
engender support in Europe and America for the manufactured
“clash of civilizations” engineered by the Straussian neocons”.
The Clash of Civilisations, as well as the Satanic Pictures
affair fit well into the Middle Eastern strategy of organised
Jewry.

A clear sign of Jewish involvement in the
Satanic Pictures affair was given by many headlines: though all
the Muslim nations were upset, the Jewish-controlled newspapers
stressed “Palestinian attacks on Europeans”, as in 2001 they
stressed “Palestinians rejoice at the collapse of the Towers”,
though many people all over the world were happy at the strike
that smote this symbol of arrogance and money power. The Israeli
daily Haaretzwrote: the Muslim press shows Sharon
and rabbis in a disrespectful light, let them try their own
medicine. This amounts to an admission that the Judeophiles were
behind the publication.

But our colleagues did not notice a grand
plan behind this action. Much as
the Pictures fit into the plan of fighting Muslims, they fit
even better into the great offensive on freedom carried out now
world-wide. From the US to Russia, from England to Italy, our
masters promulgate the web of laws to strengthen their control
and to eliminate the vestiges of freedom. In 1968, we proclaimed
“Interdit d'interdire”, “It is forbidden to forbid”; but now we
are entangled by many new prohibitions. We mayn’t choose to
smoke or not, to fasten seat belt or ride carefree. These small
annoying prohibitions are a sign of our submission to Big
Brother. And do not tell me it is done for my benefit. I can
list a hundred things more urgent for my well-being. Let them
ban indebtedness first. If I am free to take a dangerous loan, I
should be free to choose or miss the seat belt.

Our freedoms are severely curtailed. They
exist on paper, but we may not use them. We may not say what we
wish less our livelihood will be jeopardised. So many teachers
and professors found themselves out of job for saying a word out
of turn: in “democratic” Germany, a Communist could not work as
a teacher. We may not elect whom we want: when the Austrians
chose Heider, they were beaten until they agreed to give up. Now
the Palestinians chose Hamas, and they are told they will not
get their own tax money until they repent. (In a similar vein,
the Bible provides for debt cancellation every seven years, but
the Talmud allows the creditor to tie up and beat the debtor
until he insists to pay the voided debt). Every time, be it guns
for the folks in remote Montana, a cigarette in a Dublin pub, a
seat belt for you, or a free vote for all of us, the great
opinion-making machine of mass media enforced the prohibition.
Sometimes, as in the case of the Satanic Pictures, it does not
balk at deliberate provocation to make its point clear: we are
not allowed to say what we want.

The media machine’s devotion to the Jewish
cause allows us to guess that it is not run by oil sheiks. But
let us presume (and deal with this presumption later) that the
Jews and their Judaeophile supporters built up their media
empire for another purpose. If you feel (as so many good people
do) an urgent need to exonerate the Jews, you may believe that
the Jews organised their media holding just in order to fight
antisemitism, while the evil Mammonites utilised this machine
for their own need of establishing the world dictatorship. You
may consider the Jews as the Dwarves who wrought the Ring of
Power, and it was taken by the Mammonites. They promoted the
narrative of antisemitism and holocaust in order to keep the
Jews fighting on their side against the people. They
indoctrinate the Jews in belief that the normal humans want to
devour them and only the ruling Mammonites prevent it. Indeed,
as I wrote in
The Third Dove, there is no antisemitism, as there are
no witches, and, alas, no Santa Claus.

The media machine is good at enlisting
allies, by the same means the ordinary Jews are enlisted, i.e.
by propagating fear. They invented “homophobia”, so a homosexual
will fear normal folks and apply for the protection of Big
Brother. They invented “male chauvinism” and “battered wives”,
so women will be afraid of their menfolk and seek the rulers’
shelter. They invented “racism”, so every ethnic minority would
hide under the guardianship of Big Brother. They created the
myth of “abused children”, so the wives will distrust their
husbands. These are myths. There is no “homophobia” – we really
do not give a damn what you do at your bedrooms, as long as you
do not frighten horses. Men are naturally protective of children
and chivalrous towards women. White folks like blacks being
jolly and playing their banjo, as long as it is not all night
long. I tell you: we all are minorities, and together, we are
the people. We can do very well together without guardianship of
Big Brother.

There is nothing to fear abroad, either. In
the days of my youth, Americans were frightened by the Domino
theory. After the Communist takeover of Vietnam and Cambodia,
they would proceed to California, run the writ. It came to
naught. The fear of Communism destroyed trillions of dollars of
national product across the globe and eventually ruined the
great social experiment. The victorious mice judge the slain
lion: at the initiative of Poland and the Baltic states, The
Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE)
condemned “horrors and crimes of Communism.” Now the machine
plays up the fear of Islam. Islam was provoked and its response
was presented as the proof of its depravity.

The great fear-producing machine won’t stop
at the Middle East, or at the narrow Jewish causes, and for a
good reason. A tank can be used as a nut-cracker, but it has
more functions than that. The unified and perfected Jewish
media machine can be utilised for much more important tasks than
fighting off holocaust jokes. Its main goal is to bring us to
the Brave New World, to the new spiritless totalitarianism,
while smaller tasks are incidental to the great one.

Last month there were a few important but
apparently unconnected developments. The British PM, Tony Blair,
made a step towards total control over his population. England
introduced a new computer system that collects and stores data
of car traffic. Connected to ubiquitous video cameras, it allows
the Big Brother to trace your movements from your work to your
girlfriend and to your home. It passed without a hitch. Then it
tried to pass the Internet Terror Bill, that would have given
police the power to shut down websites which “promote
terrorism”. The House of Lords blocked it. Last month the Lords
threw out plans for a new offence of “glorifying” acts of
terrorism. The Government was also defeated when peers voted to
redraft ministers' version of the offence of “intentionally” or
“recklessly” disseminating a “terrorist publication”. And the
best of all, the indomitable Lords blocked the bill against
“religious hatred” which was supposed to close the only loophole
for criticising Jews.

After that, the Adversary splashed the
Satanic Pictures. The predictable and predicted reaction of the
offended Muslims will force the parliaments to accept the new
set of ‘anti-hate’ laws. Surely these laws will not protect the
feelings of Muslims and Christians, who, after all, encompass
only a few billion humans. The Jews, the preferred mascot of the
Mammonites, will feel better protected (and more vulnerable),
but more important, freedom of speech will receive another blow.

This great freedom was the advantage of the
West over the Soviet East, for one of the less savoury features
of the Soviet regime was its infamous Article 58 of the Criminal
Code “Anti-Soviet propaganda”. In the early Stalin’s days, one
has to express sympathy with the enemies of the Republic to be
sentenced; in his heyday, a joke would suffice; in Brezhnev’s
era it was used to ensure conformity in the society. Even in the
very end of the Soviet days, the Damocles’ sword of Article 58
influenced all discussion and eventually allowed Gorbachev to
carry out his transformation of Russia without a debate. He
eliminated the social achievements of the Soviet era,
surrendered Russian industry and oil to a few Jewish crooks,
gave the keys of the Russian might to the CIA and broke up the
country into feuding successor states. The only positive feature
of Gorbachev-Yeltsin transformation was the removal of Article
58. Now it is creeping back.

Some time ago booby-trapped anti-Jewish
billboards appeared in Moscow. When a passer-by tried to remove
it, the explosive device went off. The government rushed an
‘anti-hate’ bill through the parliament, and lo! No more
anti-Jewish billboards came to be. A month ago, there was an
extremely fishy incident in a Moscow synagogue, and a new
reinforced ‘anti-extremism’ bill was introduced into the Russian
parliament.

Thus, under the cover of fighting extremism,
terrorism and hatred, the remainder of freedom on our planet
shrinks from day to day. Eugene Rostow, “a Kennedy’s
Huntington”, predicted in 1960s that the two systems, Communism
and Capitalism would eventually converge, and bring forth the
best features of both systems. Now the Convergence has actually
taken place. Once, the Red East was socially secure, but at the
expense of personal freedom, while the West was free at the
expense of equality and social guarantees. Now they have
converged: the Russians have lost their free schools and health
and have received the freedom to sleep under the bridge, while
the West now has its own Gulag and its own political dissidents.
East and West reinstalled Article 58 under the guise of
anti-hate, anti-terrorism, anti-extremism laws.

The grand plan of world domination is
unveiling. On its first stage, the power of old elites and of
the church was broken. The Mammonite enemy used democracy and
liberty as his weapons against the old order, and we, the Left
and the Liberals, enjoyed his support. The adverse vote in the
House of Lords (albeit reshuffled and remoulded) proves that the
old system with all its faults had some positive qualities. But
that stage is over. Now the enemy is fighting against democracy
and liberty, employing fear and (anti-)racism.

The enemy has the advantage of infiltrating
both left and right, of mainstream and alternative media, of
interaction on the global scale. Following a defeat in England
they can attack in France and provoke in Gaza. They can cause
grief and feign horror at your response. As long as this machine
is intact, war and fear are unavoidable for they are its
products. Moreover, this is the reason why the powerful
Mammonites – not Jews at all – use and support this machine. The
machine produces fear, and allows them to usher in their
dictatorship. But we have to win unless we want our children to
live in the world of slaves and masters. You do not have to care
about Muslim sensibilities or Jewish prejudices – it is your
freedom at stake. We have to think globally because our enemy
acts globally. We must defeat fear and discord, the main tools
of the enemy.

[1] In my essay
Midas Ears I wrote: “Indeed, much of media is owned
or controlled by Jews . . . Surely a coincidence? Do not
bet on it. In 2004, a Jewish historian Simcha Epstein of Israel Antisemitism
Institute said at
the Sasson Conference in the Hebrew University:

«The pre-war anti-Semites said that
the Jews of France organized a syndicate secretly
bankrolling and subverting the press. And what did the
Jews say at that time? They said: «Of course not! No,
it’s a lie, of course not! We are not engaged in
conspiracies!» And what did the historians and the
Jewish historiography coming afterwards say? «Of course
not! It is anti-Semitic drivel!» But we know now from
Jewish sources that before the WWII the Jews of France
secretly financed the press. Since the end of the 19th
century, there was a secret Jewish organization, well
financed, which bought and bankrolled newspapers.
Sometimes it took over existing newspapers, which
suddenly became pro-Dreyfus because they received Jewish
subsidies. New papers were created especially by the
Jews. Two very important papers of the period, one was
called Les Droits de
l'Homme, the Rights of
Man, was financed by the Jews, and L’Humanité,
which was the Socialist and then the Communist newspaper
of France, was also financed
by Jews. I say this on the authority of Jewish sources
of course. And this brings us
to a dramatic dilemma of historiography. Saying this,
saying what I said, is something horrible and
unacceptable, because it means that the Jews organized a
conspiracy and secretly bought the media, or part of the
media. That was precisely what the anti-Semites said at
that time, and what they still say today. And we know
now from Jewish sources that the allegations were true,
that there was a Jewish clandestine activity of
bankrolling the press. [Listen
to this sentence ]

Some people perceive every suggestion that Jews are able
to act together as a mad conspiracy theory. Let them
read and re-read this report by a Jewish historian made
at a Jewish conference. Do we need another fifty years
to wait for another Jewish scholar to reveal to our
children what we know ourselves, to wit, there is a
Jewish empire of media, so vast that the sun never sets
there?