I'm sorry, I think there's a huge difference between going to the bathroom and feeding your child. If you can't handle the sight of a woman's breast, that's your problem.

Under many circumstances, I love the sight of women's breasts. Just call me old-fashioned - I am uncomfortable with women breast feeding in public.

That being said, I don't think the practice should be outlawed. I don't think it's harming anybody. I just don't like it because I think breast feeding should be done in private - just like relieving yourself.

No one, but merely saying its the law and therefore you will support it is contradicting your current statement.

No, it isn't.

I hate having to spell everything out for you guys over and over again. Thankfully, I've been a middle school basketball coach for the past three years so I've learned to be patient when teaching children.

I break up ethics into two groups: personal and societal. You can have personal beliefs that are more inclined to your specific situation in life, but when we start talking about society as a whole, we sometimes have to abandon this personal moral system for the sake of the greater good. Thus, I believe in accepting the law as a supreme authority in societal ethics.

I hate having to spell everything out for you guys over and over again. Thankfully, I've been a middle school basketball coach for the past three years so I've learned to be patient when teaching children.

I break up ethics into two groups: personal and societal. You can have personal beliefs that are more inclined to your specific situation in life, but when we start talking about society as a whole, we sometimes have to abandon this personal moral system for the sake of the greater good. Thus, I believe in accepting the law as a supreme authority in societal ethics.

Oh. I do understand now. Your a Canadian. I forgot that. You think the good of the whole outweighs the right of the individual. I am sure that it does in Canada. Not in the United States. That is why the United States is a Democratic elected Republic. That is why the United States has a bill of rights guaranteeing that the rights of the individual will be free from government.

Oh. I do understand now. Your a Canadian. I forgot that. You think the good of the whole outweighs the right of the individual. I am sure that it does in Canada. Not in the United States. That is why the United States is a Democratic elected Republic. That is why the United States has a bill of rights guaranteeing that the rights of the individual will be free from government.

The United States is a Representative Republic. We elect Congressmen/women and Senators to represent us.

Oh. I do understand now. Your a Canadian. I forgot that. You think the good of the whole outweighs the right of the individual. I am sure that it does in Canada. Not in the United States. That is why the United States is a Democratic elected Republic. That is why the United States has a bill of rights guaranteeing that the rights of the individual will be free from government.

Sorry to shock you with this revelation, but Canada is also democratic and has a bill of rights.

And you describe as if I am an anti individualist, a fascist or commie saying the state and basic welfare of all trump freedom. That is incorrect: there is a balance between security, welfare and freedom. They are all equally important. I believe we should seek to maintain this balance as best as is realistically possible.

Sorry to shock you with this revelation, but Canada is also democratic and has a bill of rights.

And you describe as if I am an anti individualist, a fascist or commie saying the state and basic welfare of all trump freedom. That is incorrect: there is a balance between security, welfare and freedom. They are all equally important. I believe we should seek to maintain this balance as best as is realistically possible.

I believe when we start giving up individual rights for that reason then all is lost and we have no balance, no liberty and no safety

4th amendment is no longer applicable at all
6th is null and void if you mention PATRIOT ACT
8th is null and void if you are considered a material witness. You are then detained without representation, a trial or allowed any contact at all, against your will
1st is null and void due to the PATRIOT ACT allowing the government to spy on religious services.