CLUCK (Citizens Lobbying for Urban Chicken Keeping) is a group working in support of backyard hens in Sarasota.
We've had success in the city and are turning our efforts to the County.
Write to volunteer, show support or ask questions at
sarasotacluck@gmail.com
And check out our Facebook page:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=118190386787&ref=ts
All we are saying is: Give Peeps A Chance.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Around 7:15 on the evening of Saturday December 18th, 2010, the Sarasota CLUCK blog recorded its five thousandth pageview. The first blog entry was June 11, 2009.

The Sarasota CLUCK blog started off slowly --the average number of page views per day over the entire year and a half period is only nine.

Dramatic Increase in Pageviews

But over the last three weeks the pace increased dramatically, averaging 90 pageviews a day.

Aside from the decimal elegance of this milestone, what does 5,000 pageviews mean? Is it significant?

There are two aspects to the significance, first it reflects broad interest in the topic. Because this is the internet, anyone anywhere can log on to view this material, but because it is focused on Sarasota and backyard chickens, we have to believe the vast majority of pageviews represent local interest.

Secondy, and more importantly, it represents what may be the most ambitious public outreach effort for a volunteer citizen-led initiative in the City of Sarasota. Seventy (70) different blog posts are available with a keyword search box (that white box in the upper left) that allows anyone with internet service to search and access opinion, analysis, humor, and events. In addition, the blog provides to links to numerous local media reports on the subject and more than 20 links to other backyard-chicken related websites.

The CLUCK initiative is not run by paid staff --- it is an all volunteer effort and may represent the most extensive volunteer citizen outreach effort ever undertaken in the City of Sarasota.

If you can think of another contender for this title, please utilize the comment box to stake a claim.

POSTSCRIPT Dec 19th. . . . In the 24 hours since this was first posted, more than a hundred additional pageviews were recorded.

One unfortunate aspect of the current debate regarding urban chickens in Sarasota is the tendency (probably for people on both sides) to adopt a position first, and then cast about for arguments supporting that position second. One thing that gets lost in such a process is a clear definition of precisely what people are taking a position on.

Too often the position is based simply on the idea of chickens. While some are neutral, many people like or don't like chickens to start with and base their position on that initial reaction rather than taking the time to consider 1) what is actually being proposed and 2) whether their personal likes or dislikes should govern their neighbors behavior -- a somewhat appealing fantasy until the situation is reversed and your neighbor gets to govern your behavior.

The Pelican Press published an editorial Dont' say no to chickens just yet that adopts an open-minded stance, neither gung-ho chicken advocacy nor no-way prejudice. They note many of the urban areas that already allow chickens and endorse 5 provisions already in the draft ordinance language.

They support chicken workshops to help ensure neophytes have some idea what they are getting into. (Such IFAS Extension Office workshops already exist here in Sarasota. Learn how to sign up here.)

And they advocate a sunset provision, an idea this blog will respond to separately.

All in all, the Pelican should be congratulated for approaching the subject with an open, but critical mind.
The editorial ends as follows:

"It would be reassuring to believe our commissioners won't ignore the positive aspects and bow to the will of those who fear change.

There is a persuasive case to be made for the nutritional value of home-grown eggs.

Friday, December 17, 2010

The Humane Society is claiming "rampant abuse of caged chickens and food safety issues after a recent undercover investigation of Publix Supermarkets main egg supplier, Cal-Maine Foods." Read the story here. Read the full report here.

One common argument against backyard chickens in Sarasota is that people can buy a dozen eggs for $1.50 or 99¢, so they should not be allowed to keep chickens.

While anyone can calculate the price of eggs produced by caged layers, few take the time to determine the cost. Watch the video here.

After watching such a video, Sarasotans can hardly be blamed for wanting to know how their eggs are produced.

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Davidson North Carolina, a town about a fifth the size of Sarasota, just approved a chicken ordinance remarkably similar to the one being proposed here in Sarasota -- four hens, no roosters, ten foot setback from property lines. The vote was 5-0. "Davidson joins Charlotte, Asheville, Chapel Hill, Raleigh, and Durham among North Carolina towns allowing chickens". Read the about it here.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Opponents of backyard chickens have some favored locales they like to invoke when discrediting chickens. This CLUCK report shows why a couple of such comparisons are groundless.

ATLANTA Rumors are Atlanta has big chicken problems. Well, for starters, Atlanta, with 541,000 people is ten times bigger than Sarasota, so any problem will be magnified by an order of magnitude.

But, and far more importantly, Atlanta allows 25 chickens, with no apparent restrictions against roosters. No wonder we hear about the situation down here -- that's four to six times as many chickens as we are discussing here in Sarasota with free wake-up calls provided.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

After being threatened by an aggressive kid, a no nonsense chicken took matters into its own wings and apparently decided the best defense was a good offense. Watch the video here.

As far was we know the ninja kid was chastened and probably embarrassed but physically unharmed.

In other news, the New York Times reported today that serious dog bites almost doubled over a 15 year period, "increasing to 9,500 in 2008 from 5,100 in 1993". Serious dog bites are dog bites that require hospitalization.

The increase "vastly exceeded population growth, and pet ownership increased only slightly during the same period" according to the report's author, Anne Elixhauser, a senior research scientist with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Among other findings:

• About 866 people a day went to the emergency room with dog bites in 2008 and about 26 were admitted each day.

CLUCK supports dog and cat pet ownership. CLUCK also supports abandoning the double standards that apply one set of expectations to privileged common pets and another far more stringent set for less common pets. Let's level the pet playing field.

Monday, December 13, 2010

The University of Florida IFAS Extension Office here in Sarasota County is announcing a CHICKENS 101 Workshop. The cost is $15. The date: Saturday January 8th. Space is limited and pre-registration is required.

If you have never raised chickens before this workshop will help you decide if chickens make sense for you, and, if so, how to have success. The image below should enlarge if you click on it. (Two clicks might be necessary.)

Sunday, December 12, 2010

The Sarasota Herald Tribune ran two batches of numerically balanced (five each) letters to the Editor (December 7 and 12th) regarding backyard hens in the City of Sarasota. Eight ran on the 7th and ten ran on the 12th. Curiously, one letter in opposition ran on both dates. According to our count, there were more than three dozen objections raised. CLUCK responded to the second batch first. Here are some brief responses:

1) HW writes about an unfortunate experience in Cleveland, but provides no dimensions of the problem. If the neighbor had four hens in the backyard this might be very relevant, but we suspect this neighbor had too many hens and possibly roosters as well. Obviously too many of any pet species can create problems for neighbors - that's why CLUCK advocates limiting hens to six or less. As far as we know there is no fixed limit on the number of dogs or cats a neighbor can have in the city (although some communities do place ceilings on the total number of pets).

2) RVMost people don’t know how much care chickens need. TRUE.But most people also don’t know how much care a dog, or firstborn child, needs and that doesn’t lead to a municipal prohibition on dogs or children. CLUCK supporters and our local extension office are responding with workshops. In addition there are now dozens of books and an extensive online network offering information and advice. Backyard Chickens has a forum with over 73,000 members and sometimes more than 1,000 are online at one time.

3) RV Strong Coop required TRUE CLUCK wants people to have success with chickens and wants chickens to be safe. The workshops noted above stress sturdy coop design. One argument for making chickens legal is to provide the incentive to spend good money on coop design instead of doing the minimum because the birds might be taken away at any time.

4) RV Feed draws rats TRUE Food draws rats. Food that people leave out for their cats attracts rats, fruit on citrus, avocado and other fruit trees attracts rats, and food scattered from bird feeders attracts rats, but we don’t prohibit outdoor feeding of four-legged pets, growing fruit trees or stocking bird feeders. The proposed code requires people to keep chicken food in secure containers and that is only common sense. Unlike many residents, chicken keepers are likely to to vigilant about rats and other scrounging omnivores.

5)RV Loose chickens could cause squabbles PARTIALLY TRUE Chickens, like dogs, cats and most other pets other than fish, can occasionally "get out" and leave the owner's premises. If there is pre-existing tension between neighbors, we agree that a loose pet can trigger a border skirmish incident. But lost dog and cat signs are common decorations on phone poles in the city and lost pets frequently result in neighbors collaborating to locate, catch and return the wayward animal. Such good neighbor initiatives build, rather than weaken, neighbor relations.

6) RV Not pleasant odor SUBJECTIVE? Dry chickens don't really have much of a discernable odor, just as many dry dogs don't smell too much.

7)RV Don’t know how the city "fathers" can consider chickensRHETORICAL The city commissioners directed staff to work on this because an organized group of responsible residents presented a reasonable case that they should. That would seem to be an obligation of a government.

8)RV Eggs are $1.50 a dozen FALSE Eggs are not being sold at a fixed cost of $1.50 a dozen. Some chain pharmacies frequently advertise 99¢/dozen eggs while Whole Foods would be happy to sell you some at prices approaching $5.00 a dozen. People who want chickens for their eggs don't simply want eggs, they want to know both what went into their eggs and how the chickens that produced those eggs were kept. See a recent Herald Tribune Article regarding egg safety and bungled federal oversight.

10)MC Animals should not be caged OPINION This is a personal opinion to which the writer is entitled. Since virtually every terrestrial pet is caged, crated, or kenneled at some point, we might infer that this individual does not believe in the keeping of pets.

11)MC Chickens are farm animals QUESTIONABLE “farm animal” has no technical meaning. Many, if not most, farms have dogs and cats. Fish, and ostriches, are farmed, but most would not consider them farm animals.Dogs are raised in deplorable “puppy mills” which could be considered dog farms. It is not clear how labeling or stereotyping an animal aids in the discussion of whether it might be an appropriate pet.

12) MC What about a hurricane? VALID CONCERN City Staff and CLUCK are advocating movable coops that can be relocated to a garage or other safe spot during tropical storms. This is a provision specifically designed for our region.

13) MC Odor on humid day QUESTIONABLE We are talking about six or fewer birds. Four laying hens should produce somewhere in the vicinity of one pound (total) of manure a day. That's 75% water, so we are talking about 4 ounces of dried waste. The quarter pound of waste that each chicken produces might be compared with data from the Four Mile watershed in Northern Virginia where dogs are estimated to contribute 5,000 pounds of feces a day, or an average of .438 pounds each per day. CLUCK is not denying that large scale application of chicken manure does not have a discernible objectionable odor, but rather that small amounts in the coop (in bedding) and outdoors will not be noticeable. And CLUCK suggests those offended by chicken waste conduct their own thought experiment: if you had to step in an equal amount of chicken or dog waste, which would you choose?

14) MC Impossible to enforce not selling eggs? TRUE As a practical matter, it is probably impossible to prevent the sale of eggs. But four to six hens are unlikely to ever produce enough eggs for sale and advertising can be prevented.

15) MC Can people come pick up eggs? PRESUMABLY YES. But four or six hens are not going to produce enough eggs to create any noticeable change in traffic to a residential home. See answer above.

16) MC College graduates said to be moving away because we do not allow chickens. Also said about noise ordinance MIXED Young people leave Sarasota for many complex reasons. It is unlikely anyone has left solely because they could not have chickens. But you don’t need to talk to many young professionals to realize that outdoor music, community gardens, backyard hens, bicycle support, and other issues are importantto them and some young professionals that leave Sarasota do cite the City's positions on amenities such as these as contributing factors.

17) MC Real estate disclosure FALSE While owners are required to disclose defects in their property that they are aware of, as far as CLUCK knows there is no requirement to disclose any information about neighboring properties.

18 )MC (Won't this lead to) another type of animal? LIKELYFALSE Using this domino theory logic, dogs should not have been allowed because they would lead to cats and cats should not have been allowed because they would lead to chickens. Dogs haven't led to wolves, and cats haven't led to cheetahs. The fact is chickens have been allowed in the City for 80% of the city’s history. No other organized group is advocating for any other animal, so the likelihood that chickens are some sort of "gateway drug" for harder, more serious pet addictions is a stretch.

19) MC What about property rights? AMBIGUOUS It is not clear what this refers to do. People who would like to have pet hens have property rights as well. Efforts to require people to have neighbors approve actions on their own property has a certain un-American ring to it. Government should not be creating a new bureaucracy mediating relations between neighbors. Do you want your neighbors having to approve changes to your yard? Vetoing what pets you can have?

20) MC Where does it stop?RHETORICAL QUESTION No one can predict the future. Who knew we'd have outdoor dining downtown, roundabouts, a return of cisterns, and teenagers wandering about in the streets in order to have a "private" cell phone conversation? See also concern 18.

21) PS No budget for code enforcement or staff MARGINALLY TRUEStaff reductions and increased code enforcement demandsresulting from foreclosures and abandoned homes have stretched resources, but there still is a budget and they do now deal with chicken complaints. We have seen no data to suggest that code enforcement actions will increase as a result of re-legalization. Enforcement calls may actually decrease or stay the same. But if the ability to enforce code and pet rules is to be a pre-requisite for having pets, we’ll have to get rid of most of the dogs and cats in the City since existing rules regarding these pets are not being enforced.

22) HB Sex discrimination against roosters – both sexes happy with roosters. It is hard to tell if this is a lighthearted tongue-in-cheek commentary or a serious claim. If it is serious, it is FALSE. Backyard Poultry magazine contains one or more ads for what are euphemistically called “chicken saddles”. One brand is called “HenSaver”. A chicken saddle, “is a device you put on your hens to protect their backs from roosters during mating. When roosters mate with hens, the hens often sustain feather loss and cuts and gashes on their backs and shoulders that can lead to infection, picking, cannibalism and death.” With a limit of just a few hens, adding a rooster would create an abusive situation. If you Google hen rooster ratio, you'll see most sources suggest hens in the double digits for each rooster. Advocating equal numbers would not make hens happy.

23) HB Why debate chickens while our country is at war? Wartime has traditionally been a time the government encourages people to have chickens. See this poster from World War I when keeping backyard hens was a patriotic duty.

The following comments were in response to from letters a week earlier, Dec. 7.

24) CK How does keeping chickens make Sarasota more attractive to a younger, hipper crowd? We guess because younger hipper people may be more interested in sustainability, and knowing where their food comes from. This was sworn testimony at a public meeting – maybe CK should respect the views of young people rather than demeaning and mocking them.

26) CK Want chickens? Get a farm! Really? And if you want grapefruit you have to buy a grove? And if you want tomatoes, you have to get another farm? If you want to practice putting, you need to buy a golf course? Again, according to the federal government: “Even the smallest backyard has room for a flock large enough to supply the house with eggs.”

27) MM Enforcement would cost money we don’t have There has been no testimony to indicate why enforcement calls should increase over the 3.5 calls per year we’ve been averaging.

28) MM no means of enforcement Not true. We have both existing staff and penalties.

31) MM Manure odor. Actually a dog that weighs the same as six chickens produces more feces. We can argue about the relative odors, but there is no reason why anyone would smell chicken manure on an adjoining property and we’re advocating language to codify that.

32) MM Most appropriate on farms or large lots Don’t tell New York, Seattle, Houston, San Francisco or dozens of other major US cities. Our country is in transition and the homey memories of illustrations of the farmstead with the pigs and sheep, and goats, and chickens and geese, and cows, etc. have been largely replaced with industrial facilities. That’s a large part of why people are interested in their own hens, a more humane life, more control over what they eat.

33) MM Surrounded by 17 dogs This indirectly makes the case for chickens. It’s hard to avoid concluding MM wouldn’t be better off surrounded by 17 chickens than 17 dogs “whose owners are not always responsible about curtailing barking or picking up feces.”

34) EA Chickens smell Not perceptibly. And I’d rather drive to Gainesville with a wet hen in the car than a wet dog.

35) EA Feces are toxic Not sure what this means exactly, I hope not an implication that other pet feces are non-toxic. Humans are wise to avoid contact with all feces.

37) EA Not fun to take care of Not sure what pets are actually “fun” to take care of (maybe sea monkeys?) – this is a subjective opinion.

38) EA Look at Key West! Key West is the poster child for what we are trying to avoid. Key West let a situation get out of hand. And its not residents who have their allowable four chickens that are the problem.

The problem is the so-called ‘gypsy chickens’ of Key West that are a feral, wild population – just like feral cats or iguanas or Muscovy ducks that no one takes care of, but which somehow reproduce and survive. It doesn’t help that some tourists feed them and consider them part of Key West’s quirky charm.

Right now there is a $50 fine for having chickens in Sarasota, which is a strong disincentive for being responsible or claiming ownership. “Oh, THOSE chickens. Never saw them before. No idea who they might belong to.”

If we have a reasonable, controlled program that allows people to have a few hens legally then the odds are better of avoiding a situation where people get chickens and release them, claiming “Who me? The’re not mine”.

39) RV This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 2 in the previous response to letters. Most people don’t know how much care chickens need. TRUE. But most people also don’t know how much care a dog, or firstborn child, needs and that doesn’t lead to a municipal prohibition on dogs or children. CLUCK supporters and our local extension office are responding with workshops. In addition there are now dozens of books and an extensive online network offering information and advice. Backyard Chickens has a forum with over 73,000 members and sometimes more than 1,000 are online at one time.

40) This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 3 in the previous response to letters. RV Strong Coop required TRUE CLUCK wants people to have success with chickens and wants chickens to be safe. The workshops noted above stress sturdy coop design. One argument for making chickens legal is to provide the incentive to spend good money on coop design instead of doing the minimum because the birds might be taken away at any time.

41) RV This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 4 in the previous response to letters. Feed draws rats TRUE Food draws rats. Food that people leave out for their cats attracts rats, fruit on citrus, avocado and other fruit trees attracts rats, and food scattered from bird feeders attracts rats, but we don’t prohibit outdoor feeding of four-legged pets, growing fruit trees or stocking bird feeders. The proposed code requires people to keep chicken food in secure containers and that is only common sense. Unlike many residents, chicken keepers are likely to to vigilant about rats and other scrounging omnivores.

42)RV This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 5 in the previous response to letters. Loose chickens could cause squabbles PARTIALLY TRUE Chickens, like dogs, cats and most other pets other than fish, can occasionally "get out" and leave the owner's premises. If there is pre-existing tension between neighbors, we agree that a loose pet can trigger a border skirmish incident. But lost dog and cat signs are common decorations on phone poles in the city and lost pets frequently result in neighbors collaborating to locate, catch and return the wayward animal. Such good neighbor initiatives build, rather than weaken, neighbor relations.

43) RV This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 6 in the previous response to letters. Not pleasant odor SUBJECTIVE? Dry chickens don't really have much of a discernable odor, just as many dry dogs don't smell too much.

44)RV This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 7 in the previous response to letters. Don’t know how the city "fathers" can consider chickens RHETORICAL The city commissioners directed staff to work on this because an organized group of responsible residents presented a reasonable case that they should. That would seem to be an obligation of a government.

45)RV This letter was printed twice, once on Dec. 7 and once on the 13th. This answer is the same as answer 8 in the previous response to letters. Eggs are $1.50 a dozen FALSE Eggs are not being sold at a fixed cost of $1.50 a dozen. Some chain pharmacies frequently advertise 99¢/dozen eggs while Whole Foods would be happy to sell you some at prices approaching $5.00 a dozen. People who want chickens for their eggs don't simply want eggs, they want to know both what went into their eggs and how the chickens that produced those eggs were kept. See a recent Herald Tribune Article regarding egg safety and bungled federal oversight.

Resourceful humor columnist David Grimes, possibly fearful of the trajectory of print media, is testing the waters with a possible career change as chicken cop. Of course, chicken enforcement in Sarasota may not have much of a future if some other communities are any indication.

Seattle is apparently a hip city somewhere left of Chicago that is best known for the Space Needle, a large object loosely based on the parachute jump at Coney Island. Seattle recently increased the number of chickens residents can have from three to eight --probably a desperate effort to retain work for their chicken enforcers. They must be trying to get to a number of hens high enough to provoke a reaction from neighbors, most of whom are employed as extras on Grey's Anatomy.

And those assigned to chicken enforcement in Fort Collins Colorado are thinking of trading places with Maytag repairmen -- out of 12,000 animal control calls in 2009 only 3 were chicken related. Other calls were for oxygen for chickens too rapidly relocated from Florida.

Cary, North Carolina has had similar dismal results keeping chicken enforcers employed -- less than .3% of their animal control calls were chicken related. Grimes only hope is that Sarasota is significantly more dysfunctional than dozens of other cities that allow backyard hens.