Pope Refuses to be trapped by Cardinal Burke and Allies

Pope believes questions posed on divorced and remarrieds are designed to force him into debate on cardinal's terms

(Note: Given below is the view of Tablet in UK, over 100 years old (first issue in May 1840 ) official Catholic weekly like ‘America’ in US. US cardinal Burke, who got a rap on the knuckle and got demoted for being a lone critic earlier, now reappears to say that he is in company and so must be taken seriously. That is the trap. Will majority or company make a wrong, right? It seems to work in certain democracies of Trump and Modi. And remember Gandhi was a loner in many cases and right.

Here the simple truth, in CCV’s very humble, fallible opinion, seems to be this: No one in this world, whether Pope or prostitute, has a hot line to God almighty, supposed to be the embodiment of all truth, granting that there is such a God. And none of us can rationally think of a Truth eternal that says: OK, to what we humans know to be untrue through his limited vision. In other words there is no ‘Yes or No’ answers to the type of questions discussed here. Otherwise we all have to fall into the trap of believing in an unreasonable God, a God who can never be bound by human logic, a God who is above, below or contrary to reason.

Bound by the limitations of space, time and understanding, we all may have to say: “We just don’t know” and opt for what makes life here below more bright and less brittle, more bearable and less unbearable, in the hands of a God whose name is “Mercy and pardon unparallel” and not a “Cruel Judge” quick to condemn and slow to pardon. james kottoor, editor).

One of Pope Francis’ most prominent critics has upped the ante. In an interview with the National Catholic Register United State’s Cardinal Raymond Burke has said the pontiff is “teaching error” by suggesting divorced and remarried Catholics can receive communion and has threatened to make a “formal act of correction.”

But the Pope has not responded so the group – including Joachim Meisner, retired leader of Cologne, Carlo Caffarra, retired leader of Bologna, and Walter Brandmüller, formerly in charge of the Vatican’s historical sciences committee – have gone public with their concerns.

So why is the Pope staying silent? Francis believes their questions are a trap and has opted not to engage in a debate which seems on the cardinals' terms and designed to make him restate old rules. He has also definitively endorsed the Argentinian bishops’ position which is that communion can be given to remarried Catholics in some cases – and he is leaving it up to individual bishops in general to make the call.

For the conservatives this is the crux of the problem. It is not so much “confusion” about the document but that the Pope has ruled in favour of personal conscience, discernment and power to the local churches. That is scary for them because it means throwing off the comfort blanket of clean, clear unequivocal papal teaching.

But the truth is that when it comes to marriage and divorce a “one size fits all” solution doesn’t work, and Francis knows it. He also knows that most Catholics agree and that Amoris Laetitia reflects the reality of countless numbers of parishes. And he may be sceptical of the claim that the faithful are “confused” from a group of cardinals not currently engaged in front-line pastoral work.

Anyone watching the new Netflix series “The Crown” might have been struck by the similarity between this debate and the Church of England’s refusal to allow Princess Margaret to marry Group Captain Peter Townsend, on the grounds he was a divorced man.

The proposed marriage between Margaret and Townsend, the senior bishops tell the young Queen in one scene, cannot happen as it would threaten the sacrament of marriage. Those events took place more than half a century ago and the Church of England has since changed its position on the issue.

And in the Catholics’ similar debate over communion for divorced and remarried Francis is betting that his teaching will be the one that stands the test of time.

This website is a news forum for all Christian citizens or clergy, from around the world. This website also publishes varied personal views of Catholic Church Citizens and distinct reports concerning the Catholic Church or what seems to have relevance to it. Articles, reports and news published in this website carry the views and perceptions of the authors or sources concerned, who only are responsible for their content. Publishing of an article or comment here does not involve acceptance or agreement with the contents on the part of the above mentioned parties. No responsibility or liability shall attach itself to KCRM, its website almayasabdam.com or to its administrators for any or all of the articles or comments placed here.

More

Join Church Citizens’ Forum

Name

Email *

What Have You Done?

"I was hungry, and you formed a humanities club, and discussed my hunger.
I was imprisoned, and you crept of quietly to your chapel in the cellar and prayed for my release.
I was naked, and in your mind you debated the morality of my appearance.
I was sick, and you knelt and thanked God for your good health.
I was homeless, and you preached to me the spiritual shelter of the love of God.
I was lonely, and you left me alone to pray for me.
You seem so holy, so close to God:
But I am still very hungry, and lonely and cold.
So where have your prayers gone? What have they done?
What does it profit a man to go through his book of prayers, when the rest of the world is crying for help.
-Bob Rawland

Comments are subject to moderation, but only once per commentator. The 1st comment box directly links the article to your account in the Social Media while LEAVE A REPLY comment box is intended for discussions/debates. Bring the cursor to the date on the calendar below and see the posts on that date in the pop-up window that appears there. Thank You.