On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com> wrote:
> DT bindings for PCI host bridges often use the ranges property to describe> memory and IO ranges - this binding tends to be the same across architectures> yet several parsing implementations exist, e.g. arch/mips/pci/pci.c,> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c, arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c and> arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c (clone of PPC). Some of these duplicate> functionality provided by drivers/of/address.c.
Hm I wanted to test but was blocked by this:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Making the raw patch look like this:
=09const u32 *ranges;
-=09int rlen;
-=09int pna =3D of_n_addr_cells(dev);
-=09int np =3D pna + 5;
=09int memno =3D 0, isa_hole =3D -1;
I bet the other ARM guys can help you get the format right
somehow... can't you just use git send-email?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> What is the status of the below patch? Both Marvell PCIe driver and> Tegra PCIe driver need a way to parse the ranges = <...> property of> the PCI DT node.>> Would it be possible to get this patch merged for 3.10, or get some> review comments that would allow us to rework it in time for 3.10 ?
Thomas can you supply a Reviewed-by/Tested-by tag?
That certainly helps...
I was meaning to test it on the Integrator but I've been sidetracked.
It'd be good to take this through ARM SoC's DT branch so different
platforms can use it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Dear Linus Walleij,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:50:09 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Would it be possible to get this patch merged for 3.10, or get some> > review comments that would allow us to rework it in time for 3.10 ?> > Thomas can you supply a Reviewed-by/Tested-by tag?> That certainly helps...
Yes, I'm planning on testing RFC v3 from Andrew right now, and send a
new version of the Marvell PCIe patch set that includes it. If all goes
well, should happen this afternoon.
Thanks,
Thomas