Pre-hospital RSI

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3034A.B385F5F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
we use sufficient midazolam to sedate, cricoid pressure, lidocaine (icp/head
injury), atropine (bradycardia), sux, then if necessary Vecuronium bromide
for longer paralysis (with additional sedation); so far no adverse effects;
if unable to intubate, then LMA is placed. I have the article also, and
find many flaws with their procedure and process for investigation.
john
John Atwell Rasmussen, Ph.D., REMTP
Lieutenant, Education and Training
Greenville County EMS
(864) 467-7389
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are
hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,
distribution, reproduction, or any action taken in reliance upon this
message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in
this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily
reflect the views of the company.
-----Original Message-----
From: MARK FORREST [mailto:atacc.doc@virgin.net]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 6:18 PM
To: trauma-list@trauma.org
Subject: Pre-hospital RSI
Dear Colleagues,
I approached the paper on 'paramedic RSI in severe traumatic brain
injuries', J Trauma, vol 54, March 2003 with great interest.
The conclusions are 'Paramedic RSI improves intubation success rates but is
associated with increase in mortalityand decrease in "good outcomes" when
compared to hand-matched controls'
Various reasons are given for this, but after reading the methods I am
frankly not surprised.
I was horrified to read that the RSI is performed with sux and midazolam,
but sedation is only given if systolic BP is >120mmHg and even when given,
the maximum dose was 3mg (for the >100Kg group)!
This does NOT constitute 'anaesthesia' and these patients were paralysed and
not 'asleep'. No record is made of post-intubation systolic blood pressures,
which were probably very high. Similarly, no account was made of the effects
on ICP during such 'awake-intubation'!
Is this a standard 'RSI' practice in other parts of the world?
Another area of concern in the methods involves the period of
de-nitrogenation before starting. 'a minimum of 60 seconds using a
non-rebreather mask. If oxygen saturation remained below 95%, then bag and
mask ventilation were instituted before medication...'
When I was taught RSI all manual ventilation was avoided to prevent
increased risk of gastric inflation and increased risk of aspiration!
Considering these two issues and a number of others including the
hyperventilation to ETCO2 30-35mmHg and hypoxia 'sufficient to produce
bradycardia' in many of the cases, I am in no way surprised by the poor
outcome figures.
Any comments, especially by paramedics/docs who competently perform RSI on a
regular basis?
Regards
Mark F
UK
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3034A.B385F5F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4913.1100" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=749412612-15042003><FONT face="Microsoft Sans Serif" size=4>we
use sufficient midazolam to sedate, cricoid pressure, lidocaine (icp/head
injury), atropine (bradycardia), sux, then if necessary Vecuronium bromide for
longer paralysis (with additional sedation); so far no adverse effects; if
unable to intubate, then LMA is placed.&nbsp; I have the article also, and find
many flaws with their procedure and process for
investigation.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=749412612-15042003><FONT face="Microsoft Sans Serif"
size=4></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=749412612-15042003><FONT face="Microsoft Sans Serif"
size=4>john</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=center><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>John Atwell Rasmussen,
Ph.D., REMTP</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=center><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Lieutenant, Education
and Training</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=center><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Greenville County
EMS</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=center><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>(864)
467-7389</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=center><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>The information
transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction, or any action taken
in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views
expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not
necessarily reflect the views of the company.</FONT></DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> MARK FORREST
[mailto:atacc.doc@virgin.net]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, April 14, 2003 6:18
PM<BR><B>To:</B> trauma-list@trauma.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Pre-hospital
RSI<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dear Colleagues,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I approached the paper on 'paramedic RSI in
severe&nbsp;traumatic brain&nbsp;injuries', <STRONG>J Trauma, vol 54, March
2003 </STRONG>with great interest. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The conclusions are <EM>'Paramedic RSI improves
intubation success rates but is associated with increase in mortalityand
decrease in "good outcomes" when compared to hand-matched controls'
</EM></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Various reasons are given for this, but after
reading the methods I am frankly not surprised.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I was horrified to read that the RSI is performed
with sux and midazolam, but sedation is only given if systolic BP is
&gt;120mmHg and even when given, the maximum dose was 3mg (for the &gt;100Kg
group)!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This does NOT constitute 'anaesthesia' and these
patients were paralysed and not 'asleep'. No record is made of post-intubation
systolic blood pressures, which were probably very high. Similarly, no account
was made of the effects on ICP during such 'awake-intubation'!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Is this a standard 'RSI' practice&nbsp;in other
parts of the world?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Another area of concern in the methods involves
the period of de-nitrogenation&nbsp;before starting.<EM> 'a minimum of 60
seconds using a non-rebreather mask. If oxygen saturation&nbsp;remained below
95%, then bag and mask ventilation were instituted before
medication...'</EM></FONT><EM>&nbsp;</EM></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>When I was taught RSI all manual ventilation was
avoided to prevent increased risk of gastric inflation and increased risk of
aspiration!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Considering these two issues and a number of
others including the hyperventilation to ETCO2&nbsp; 30-35mmHg and hypoxia
<EM>'sufficient to produce bradycardia'</EM> in many of the cases, I am in no
way surprised by the poor outcome figures.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Any comments, especially by paramedics/docs who
competently perform RSI on a regular basis?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Mark F</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>UK</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><EM><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3034A.B385F5F0--