Seriously, she needs help on the word dozens? She said a lot more complicated stuff than that without any whispering. How would her mic pic up
somebody else's whisper who wasn't even near her? How would a supposed ear bud in her ear be loud enough to reach her mic, but it didn't pick anything
else up?

The logical answer is, someone did not whisper dozen. The logical answer is, Trump opened his mouth and sucked in some air right into his mic. The
logical answer is, why would she need help on a generic word like dozens, but not need any help on any of the many more specific statistics she spoke?
The logical answer is, why would someone give her a generic term like dozens, when a better description would have been the actual number of people
killed at the nightclub?

Come on guys! This claim is as bad as the claims of Hillary using an ear piece during debates. Remember the shiny ear non-sense. I've just re-watched
that part of the debate and the noise is from Hillary herself. I have no horse in this race but this claim is just ridiculous!

It is a sigh.

in fact (pause) the killer (pause) of the (pause - sigh) of the dozens of people .....

I really can't say. The one question I always have is when Hillary begins relaying in minutiae detail of personal and professional instances from her
past...why does no one ask her how she can do this, yet when she is being questioned under oath, she cannot remember or recall much of anything?

The Logical Answer I come up with what you are trying to covey here is Rationalism , in an Attempt to Deny a Reality that is Personally Unpleasant to
even Consider .

That she needed help with the words "dozens" but not with anything else she said? That there is no physical way someone could be whispering loud
enough that it's heard in her mic without everyone else in the room hearing it?

Give me a break. I realize that someone is trying to rationalize something here, but it ain't me.

I heard something like that at least a couple of times during the debate last night. I have no idea what it was, but I had mentioned it to another
family member this morning and they heard it, too. Could they have been feeding her the answers? I wouldn't put it past them, but at the same
time, I'm far from certain that's what it was.

If it is Proven that she did Indeed have an Earpiece ( It Will be Proven either way Eventually ) , that was receiving Audio Coaching during the Debate
last night , then it would be Not just the Word " Dozens " being Conveyed to Her , but Entire Transcripts of her Prepared Responses on Topics that
were Announced Before this Debate . She has been known to have done this in the Past during her Campaigning .

It could have been someone in the room in which the recording was made.

Yeah, pretty much anything makes more sense than a whisper in some hypothetical earbuds being so loud it made it to her mic. And why would they need
to whisper if it was inside her ear? Why didn't they just speak in a normal tone, like they do to newscasters? There's all kinds of talk going on in
newscasters' ears, and we have yet to hear it on their mics.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.