How Did Minnesota Stay Blue in the Midterms? By Embracing, Not Running From, Progressive Values

Email this article to a friend

your email

your name

recipient(s) email (comma separated)

message

captcha

How did Minnesota Democrats do it? By focusing on women’s issues, fair pay and raising the minimum wage, and by championing—not running away from—progressive accomplishments such as workers’ rights and President Obama’s Affordable Care Act.

In the land of Lake Wobegon, progressives still reign.

Republicans gave Democrats a national wholloping during Tuesday’s midterm elections, seizing the Senate, expanding their lead in the House, and gobbling up governors’ mansions in Maryland, Massachusetts and Illinois.

But Minnesota bucked the rightward trend. In the upper Midwestern state known for progressive politics, Scandinavian sensibility and high voter turnout, Al Franken easily held onto his U.S. Senate seat (winning 53 percent of the vote), Governor Mark Dayton convincingly won reelection (by 5.5 percent), and the Democratic-Farm-Labor Party (DFL) held onto five of its eight Congressional seats.

Franken’s and Dayton’s landslide victories were particularly noteworthy because each of them had to endure statewide recounts in their initial runs for office. Franken won in 2008—a “wave year” for Democrats—by only 312 votes. (He later jokingly called that “the most efficient Senate race in history.”) Dayton won his first gubernatorial election in 2010 by less than 9,000 votes.

Republicans did regain control of the State House by ousting 11 DFL incumbents, mostly in rural Minnesota: they now have a four-seat majority (Democrats control the State Senate, which was not up for reelection this year). But the GOP failed to win seats in all but one of the first-ring suburbs of the Twin Cities, despite several tight races. In typical midterm election years, House seats in the suburbs of Eagan, Edina, Shoreview and Minnetonka would typically swing red. This year, they all remained blue.

The DFL’s successful defense of the suburbs around Minneapolis and St. Paul, and convincing victories for Dayton and Franken, could offer valuable lessons for progressives nationwide as they lick their wounds and try to develop an effective political strategy for 2016.

How did Minnesota Democrats do it? By focusing on women’s issues, fair pay and raising the minimum wage, and by championing—not running away from—progressive accomplishments such as workers’ rights and President Obama’s Affordable Care Act.

The community organizing group TakeAction Minnesota has focused much of its attention on building infrastructure and forming relationships in those first-ring suburbs, and bringing conversations about economic inequality and gender inequity to people’s doorsteps.

“We’ve been organizing in the suburbs—building relationships, recruiting volunteers, knocking on doors and working the phones,” said TakeAction communications director Greta Bergstrom. “The issues we focused on were women’s economic security, pay equity and raising the minimum wage. These are issues that poll highly in Minnesota, and we didn’t see Republicans attacking or opposing us on those issues.”

It doesn’t hurt that the Twin Cities’ first-ring suburbs, like suburbs across America, are becoming more ethnically and economically diverse. It also didn’t hurt that Mike McFadden, an investment banker who lost to Al Franken in the U.S. Senate race, fared poorly with Minnesota women on Tuesday. The DFL party successfully portrayed McFadden as running a white male-centered campaign that offered little in the way of women’s issues. The party lumped him together with Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who voted against the Violence Against Women Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act.

Marriage equality, which Minnesota passed in 2013 after State House and Senate Republicans failed to constitutionally ban it on the 2012 ballot, also did not reemerge as a decisive issue in the suburbs, though some thought it would. In fact, some House Republicans who had voted against gay marriage lost on Tuesday.

Mike McIntee, who lives in Eagan and is executive producer of The UpTake, a citizen journalism-driven, online video streaming website, has seen his first-ring suburb change politically. The residents of Eagan’s cul-de-sacs no longer exclusively resemble an episode of The Brady Bunch, but include different ethnicities and low-income housing.

“There’s a core group of hard-working volunteers who have done work to support the DFL and their candidates,” said McIntee. “The party has also done a good job of researching and reaching out to residents who are more transient or not as politically engaged.”

McIntee also credits the work of Protect Minnesota, which works to end gun violence by turning it into a political issue in urban and suburban areas. Protect Minnesota sent out mailers this election season attacking candidates who opposed gun control. Its gun-safety champions who won on Tuesday include Ron Erhardt, who represents the suburb of Edina. Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association’s influence may be waning in Minnesota. Three rural DFLers who were endorsed by the NRA all lost.

But more than anything, Franken’s and Dayton’s embrace of progressive values, and resisting temptations to run to the center, was what kept Minnesota blue on Tuesday.

“They touted they were for increasing the minimum wage, workers rights and taxing the rich and making them pay their fair share,” said McIntee. “This resonated with people who have been kicked around by the economy. Call it populist, but these are issues that have been Democratic for a long time.”

I don't think Al Franken has been a particularly strong progressive while in office. As far as I know, he supports all the wars, supports Israel's genocidal policies and their bribing of our politicians, and I have not seen him take any position independent of the democratic party. He is now comfortably sitting in a seat from which he can retire, years down the road, probably as a very rich man. What exactly is it about that conduct that would make anymore admire him is beyond me. I have nothing against Franken as an individual. It's just like Yeats said: "the best lack all conviction." Franken is probably a nice guy, but so is my mail carrier. If he wants to be a national politician, he should step up and provide real leadership, meaning oppose the wars, oppose the free trade treaties, demand a jobs bill and a full employment law, and demand Wall Street be busted up by anti-trust litigation. But instead, he smiles, does nothing. For that he gets accolades? As an aside, he spent $29 million in this campaign while his opponent spent $6 million. Why is it corrupt and awful when the right-wing wins because of their millions, but it's a great moment for progressives when a liberal wins because of their millions? One thing is certain: as long as political seats are purchased, we get people in office who are owned by the people who bought them the title. That's not us, not the citizens. That's why these people do nothing to help us. They want to keep their title, privilege and status, and the millions that flow to them from the people who want to buy them and can afford to do so. The media is full of that agonizing question: How can the Democrats win in 2016? Who cares? The only question worth asking is how can the citizens win? With these two parties, we cannot.