You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

I don't know when people are trying to argue with me, or if they agree with me or neither anymore.

Not really any of the above, just an observation, just a thought.

It seems like everything on this forum is a dance between peoples attention spans and worthwhile content. Same as real life, but here it is intensified.not that I am not guilty as well, but I don't really know disco so even if I wasn't enthralled I would have nothing to say.

It is a bit odd that a post like Discos would be absolutely ignored in favor of all this. That should speak for something.

Engaging substantially is energy intensive, and many folks don't have the inclination on every topic. Lord knows I frequently don't and my posts over the last couple of years with a few exceptions reflect that.

I understand given my reputation as a relative bomb thrower and my history on the forum that many newer folks would be reticent to engage, but I'm trying to come back a little more and open up.

That being said, I would like to seriously engage with someone on the topic.

Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
- Edmund Burke

Engaging substantially is energy intensive, and many folks don't have the inclination on every topic. Lord knows I frequently don't and my posts over the last couple of years with a few exceptions reflect that.

I understand given my reputation as a relative bomb thrower and my history on the forum that many newer folks would be reticent to engage, but I'm trying to come back a little more and open up.

That being said, I would like to seriously engage with someone on the topic.

For the record, I don't ignore your posts I simply did not read it or feel like going back to, to be honest. But I see no point as I believe that you are typed correctly anyway.

For the record, I don't ignore your posts I simply did not read it or feel like going back to, to be honest. But I see no point as I believe that you are typed correctly anyway.

P.S.: I do not think you need type anymore anyway.

I agree with you, but I would like to challenge the thought process behind the box chan was trying to put me into.

I was really hoping to hear from her, one of the folks who I'm sure agrees with her conceptualization of me. Like I posted after Nic left, I want to try and open up a little and start again on the forum, and I thought this would be a good way to start. /shrugs

For me typology, was just a stepping stone to get a better understanding of who I was like 6 years ago. It soon became clear that many treat it as more than that and ascribe more importance than I think is rationally warranted. I stuck around because there were some intelligent folks here, and a number of really good people that were worth sticking around for. I still think that although I haven't engaged enough to get to know many of the newer people.

Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
- Edmund Burke

I read Disco's response earlier and he seemed to have good reasons for rejecting ESTJ. I think people are simply confusing his political ideology and certain threads which hint at a desire to fit in with "traditional" society with ideas of traits SJs should supposedly exhibit.

It is the ruling of this court that ENTJ 8w9 stands.

Steve heard the "mrrroooooooow" just in time to look up and see an orange ball of fur whizzing by his head. Suddenly there were flying furballs coming from all directions. The formerly placid suburb was now populated by loud "mrowws" and "mews" ascending and descending in pitch, not unlike a speeding police car's siren heard via the doppler effect. The cats were legless yet hovered by some phantom force, zipping around with their bushy tails flapping behind them.

I read Disco's response earlier and he seemed to have good reasons for rejecting ESTJ. I think people are simply confusing his political ideology and certain threads which hint at a desire to fit in with "traditional" society with ideas of traits SJs should supposedly exhibit.

It is the ruling of this court that ENTJ 8w9 stands.

"Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"

“Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft