I didn't know Swank had a blanket license. Anyone know anything about
that? I only knew about title-by-title streaming rights from Swank.

We have the CCC so-called "blanket license" for print materials and I
can tell you it is not a "blanket." There are many publishers who do
not participate. And many who do participate have set individual
"terms" that limit usage. It's just a piece of the puzzle (I keep
saying that ...) I'm kind of sick of the puzzle, because more pieces
keep appearing!!

Sarah @ Hofstra

>>> Jessica Rosner <maddux2014@gmail.com> 07/29/09 10:50 AM >>>
Swank now has a license for classroom streaming.FX geez for a DVD ?
Like it
is gonna cost them so much to replace it.
Might one inquire how much they charge for shipping ?

> *And they charge the FedEx rate to us, of course. Whose new âblanket
PPR
> for classroom streamingâ?*
>
> * *
>
> *Christine Crowley Godin*
>
> Dean of Learning Resources
>
> Adjunct Faculty, Theatre
>
> *Northwest Vista College*
>
> 3535 N. Ellison Dr.
>
> San Antonio, TX 78251
>
> 210.486.4572 voice
>
> 210.486.4504 fax
>
> *cgodin@alamo.edu* (new email as of Aug. 1, 2009)
>
> * *
>
> *From:* videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
> videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:34 AM
>
> *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] classroom use of "home and community
viewing"
> dvd
>
>
>
> I am curious about there new blanket PPR license for classroom
streaming.
> Anyone got one of those and could say how it works ?
>
>
>
> The studios more or less force Swank to do the send you your own DVD
and
> mail back thing but I get that it can be a pain in the neck
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM, GODIN, CHRISTINE
<cgodin@mail.accd.edu>
> wrote:
>
> *No, I meant that when you are planning to show feature film you have
to
> request that title for a particular date. They send the movie (whether
you
> need it or not, apparently) and you must return it using the label
provided.
> Each title and show dates are licensed individually, I guess. I assume
if
> you are doing a pre-planned film series, it would be one long
document, but
> if you want to have a showing of âInconvenient Truthâ, for instance,
you
> must make that request, get the invoice. For those of us with tedious
> purchasing departments, it is a mini-nightmare.*
>
> * *
>
> *Christine Crowley Godin*
>
> Dean of Learning Resources
>
> Adjunct Faculty, Theatre
>
> *Northwest Vista College*
>
> 3535 N. Ellison Dr.
>
> San Antonio, TX 78251
>
> 210.486.4572 voice
>
> 210.486.4504 fax
>
> *cgodin@alamo.edu* (new email as of Aug. 1, 2009)
>
> * *
>
> *From:* videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
> videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Jessica Rosner
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 29, 2009 8:51 AM
>
>
> *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] classroom use of "home and community
viewing"
> dvd
>
>
>
> The Swank license requires you to tell them each item you use ? Do
they
> let you license the entire studio collection or only what they have up
?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:43 AM, GODIN, CHRISTINE
<cgodin@mail.accd.edu>
> wrote:
>
> *This sounds a bit like the annual copyright license one can buy now
for
> print materials. It would be great to subscribe to a service like
that,
> report usage, allow the participating producers to collect fees. The
> administrative burden of applying for PPR from Swank or each producer
now is
> daunting, never mind the cost. Most of us donât want a copy sent to
viewâwe
> already have that. We just want to be able to maximize the use of that
> resource without having to hire yet another clerk to keep track of the
> rights and permissions.*
>
> * *
>
> *Christine Crowley Godin*
>
> Dean of Learning Resources
>
> Adjunct Fac> *cgodin@alamo.edu* (new email as of Aug. 1, 2009)
>
> * *
>
> *From:* videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
> videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Dennis Doros
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:48 PM
>
>
> *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] classroom use of "home and community
viewing"
> dvd
>
>
>
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for taking the correction so kindly. We disagree, but to be
honest,
> what I'd really love is that there's a national fund, just like
Australia
> has, that would let colleges do whatever the hell they want on
campuses and
> students would have access to everything. Then colleges would be
delighted
> to report usage since it would be no extra cost. And then filmmakers
and
> rights holders would see decent-sized checks on a regular basis rather
than
> have to invoice one film at a time.
>
>
>
> Come to think of it, this is what we should all be fighting for in
congress rather
> than trying to change copyright piecemeal. We even have a political
> administration that is tech savvy.
>
>
>
> D
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Brewer, Michael <
> brewerm@u.library.arizona.edu> wrote:
>
> You are right. I misspoke about the word not being in the law. I
regret
> having sent my last email without thinking it through and being more
clear.
>
> That said, I do still think that this wording does not mean that only
less
> than the whole can be used. The court cases and practices I sited
before
> make it pretty clear that it can. My reading, and I assume the reading
of
> the judges in those cases, is that "portion used in relation to the
whole"
> here is taken to mean "what percentage of the work is being used?"
>
> I'd like to know more about how judges have written about this in
their
> rulings. I'll snoop around a bit and see what I can come up with and
share
> it with the list.
>
> Thanks for keeping me honest!
>
> mb
> ________________________________
> From: videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu [
> videolib-bounces@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Doros [
> milefilms@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 5:43 PM
>
> To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] classroom use of "home and community viewing"
dvd
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Brewer, Michael <
> brewerm@u.library.arizona.edu<mailto:brewerm@u.library.arizona.edu>>
> wrote:
> The law says nothing about it having to be a portion. There have been
a
> number of fair use cases that have been upheld where an entire work
was
> used. It could be a portion or more than a portion (an entire article,
poem,
> image, whatever).
>
>
> Copyright Law Section 107
>
> * The purpose and character of the use, including whether such
use is
> of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
> * The nature of the copyrighted work
> * The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation
to the
> copyrighted work as a whole
> * The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value
of,
> the copyrighted work
>
> --
> Best,
> Dennis Doros
> Milestone Film & Video
> PO Box 128
> Harrington Park, NJ 07640
> Phone: 201-767-3117
> Fax: 201-767-3035
>
> email: milefilms@gmail.com<mailto:milefilms@gmail.com>
> www.milestonefilms.com<http://www.milestonefilms.com>
> www.arayafilm.com<http://www.arayafilm.com>
> www.exilesfilm.com<http://www.exilesfilm.com>
> www.killerofsheep.com<http://www.killerofsheep.com>
> AMIA St. Louis 2009: www.amianet.org<http://www.amianet.org>
>
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
issues
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
control,
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
libraries and
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
effective
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
communication
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video p> Phone: 201-767-3117
> Fax: 201-767-3035
> email: milefilms@gmail.com
> www.milestonefilms.com
> www.arayafilm.com
> www.exilesfilm.com
> www.killerofsheep.com
> AMIA St. Louis 2009: www.amianet.org
>
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
issues
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
control,
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
libraries and
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
effective
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
communication
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
> distributors.
>
>
>
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
issues
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
control,
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
libraries and
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
effective
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
communication
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
> distributors.
>
>
>
> VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of
issues
> relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic
control,
> preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in
libraries and
> related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an
effective
> working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of
communication
> between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and
> distributors.
>
>

VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic control, preservation, and use of current and evolving video formats in libraries and related institutions. It is hoped that the list will serve as an effective working tool for video librarians, as well as a channel of communication between libraries,educational institutions, and video producers and distributors.
Received on Wed Jul 29 08:31:03 2009