Archives

Counsel for Dan Parisi, Richard Oparil (Left as displayed with & by the Anti-Sinclair website Oparil has based his arguments on) has filed a Motion to Lift Stay ordered by Judge Leon on December 22, 2010 in Parisi v Sinclair 1:10-cv-00897-RJL today. On December 22, 2010 Judge Leon issued the following order:

“It is hereby ORDERED that all proceedings other than the filings of motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment are hereby STAYED until further notice from the Court.”

U.S. District CourtDistrict of ColumbiaNotice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered by Oparil, Richard on 7/19/2011 at 12:03 PM and filed on 7/19/2011

The following transaction was entered on 7/19/2011 at 5:16 PM and filed on 7/19/2011

Case Name:

PARISI et al v. SINCLAIR et al

Case Number:

1:10-cv-00897-RJL

Filer:

LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR

Document Number:

127

Docket Text:Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [125] MOTION to Lift Stay, [126] MOTION for Leave to File An Amended And Supplemental Complaint by LAWRENCE W. SINCLAIR (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(SINCLAIR, LAWRENCE)

The Court currently still has pending before it Larry’s Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment and Defendant Jeffrey Rense Motion to Dismiss on Jurisdictional grounds. Parisi counsel Oparil sought consent from Larry and other parties to the case (though it appears Oparil failed to remember Barnes & Noble was still a party to this action) inwhich all parties contacted noted their opposition to such a motion.

What we have found more than a little interesting in the latest motion filed by Oparil as well as the last three motions which the Court has denied is the claim that “Sinclair’s defense rest solely on his claim that he received anonymous calls claiming Parisi and Axelrod had arranged a rigged polygraph.” Clearly Mr. Oparil seems to overlook the multiple lies and dishonest articles published by Dan Parisi and Whitehouse.com before and after the polygraph. The repeated phone calls from Parisi employee Robert Braddock threatening Larry if he did not turn over emails between himself and attorney Gloria Allred, etc… or the fact that Parisi, Gelb and Braddock all three on Feb 22, 2008 stated to Larry that they did not/ and would not know the results of the polygraph until Monday Feb 25, 2008 at the earliest and then published two “reports” from Edward Gelb dated Feb 22, 2008. Not to mention the fact that Dan Parisi never, ever denied the claims despite repeated efforts by Larry to get Dan Parisi to confirm or deny them. Mr. Oparil might want to review the exhibits of the intentional false statements and claims published by his client on whitehouse.com (Parisi has blocked the “wayback” machine or Internet Archive from displaying whitehouse.com as it appeared in 2008). In fact despite the fact that Parisi now claims in this suit the information is false, Larry still to this day believes the statements to be truthful.

Mr. Oparil and his client Dan Parisi would like the court and everyone else to believe Larry just made these things up as he went along, despite the gallery of articles published by Dan Parisi on whitehouse.com which were out right lies for the purpose of promoting himself and his dying web site.

During the writing of this article we received notice from the Clerk of the Court of more activity in this case. It appears that counsel for Parisi has decided to go ahead an file his Motion for leave to file amended and supplemental complaint despite telling the Court they would do so “if the court granted its motion to lift stay.”

Parisi through counsel Richard Oparil has filed as an exhibit his “Amended and Supplemental Complaint” and attempts to now claim Parisi is a citizen of Pennsylvania rather than New Jersey in an attempt to reap the benefit of a Pennsylvannia law he tried to get the Court to apply in his motion for reconsideration of the courts ruling as to Amazon.com. In addition to attempting to change Parisi’s place of citizenship, the amended complaint attempts to allege defamatory statements that are in fact time barred as to the statute of limitations. Richard Oparil is attempting to use his “amended and supplemental” complaint to recover from his dismal performance at the Feb 28, 2011 oral arguements hearing.

Larry Has filed a Consent Motion for Extension to File his Opposition to both. Both Motions will be opposed by Larry as he feels the Court should rule on the Motions pending before it, before Parisi and Richard Oparil are allowed to try and re-plead their defective complaint.