>No. I addressed a specific argument which claimed 'conclusive evidence'>which disproves the concept of life after death. I asked that this claim>of evidence be substantiated.

Who made such a claim? What life scientist speaks of "conclusive evidence"?

>You continue to refer to my claims about God. I have made no claims>about God, nor have I even said that I believe in a God. This is a>conclusion you draw without any foundation.

>you: An absurd request, for the reasons I sketch above. More to the>point, I never claimed (or, more cautiously, never meant to convey) that>there was 'conclusive evidence' against an afterlife. >>Ah, you're getting the point. It was absurd to claim such 'conclusive>evidence'. I merely challenged the claim. If you do not have such>evidence, then do not claim it.

I didn't.

>you: You get brownie points with God just by disagreeing with me, after>all. :)>>Obviously you must believe in a God to make such a statement.

Obviously, you have no sense of humor to take such a tongue in cheek
statement seriously.