Reviewer Guidelines

Constructive Reviewing.

TOPLAS seeks innovative, theoretical, experimental, and
survey papers. Reviewers must adapt their standards as
appropriate to each submission. As the premier programming
language journal, the accepted papers must meet the highest
standards in its domain and be accessible to a wide
audience. Regardless of the reviewer's recommendation,
reviews should always provide feedback that assists the
authors in producing the best quality work possible to the
benefit of the authors and to the benefit of the scientific
community.

Conflict of Interest Guidelines.

TOPLAS seeks unbiased reviewers, associate editors, and
editor-in-chiefs. TOPLAS prohibits those who have a conflict
of interest with the authors of the submission from
influencing its outcome. TOPLAS considers a conflict of
interest to be:

Your Ph.D. advisor and Ph.D. students, forever.

Family relations by blood, marriage, or domestic partnership, forever.

People at your current institution.

If you or the author changed institutions within the past three years, people at the prior institution.

People whose research you fund or who fund you.

Collaborators in the past five years, including co-authors
of paper or grant submissions, regardless of status (accepted, rejected, pending).

Others with whom you believe that you have a conflict of interest (check with the associate editor or editor-in-chief).

Editorial Board Submissions.

The associate editors (but not the editor-in-chief) may submit
to TOPLAS. Their papers are held to the same standards.
The software prohibits authors from viewing their
own submissions in any capacity other than author, and
therefore the anonymity of the reviewing process will be not
be compromised by associate editor submissions.