The stupidity of BD developers never ceases to amaze me...I swear I will have to pay and put all of you through a proper college for a change (not online degree from University of Chattanooga or wherever you bunch of clueless people graduated from).

The score system is not good and bad, work in progress or anything else. It is complete and total nonsense. Makes less sense than me still playing this game.How can anyone get score from LOSING? Read your damn history books...losers get nothing but the sword. So even thinking about giving someone score from losing a battle is ridiculous.

You want to improve the score system? Takes 50 lines of code and 1 day if you start using your brains for a change:

1. You get 0 score from losing a battle (only get score from winning battles)2. Your power is irrelevant...all that matters is how many units you kill in each battle you win (adjusted for vehs and tanks of course by multiplying by 2 and 3 respectively)3. You get an extra bonus -10% more score let's say for each 10% battle efficiency over 50%. So if you win a battle with 80% efficiency you get 30% more score as bonus.

Simple, reasonable, fair and efficient.

Will you do it? No of course not. You will take another two weeks and come up with an even more idiotic update to the score system. I can bet on it.

so really BD? this new system has an alliance on mars 3 with 10k score ahead of the rank 2 and they have 0 relics yes they do have crystals but the only reason they have a good rank is because they replaced member after member and did join attacks to get their score. now when anyone goes for a win they don't get rank 1 instead they get 2nd or in our case 3rd please do something about this because if you don't lots of players gonna leave the servers we placed lots of money into this era we shouldn't lose our fair win because of some (pardon my language no offense to anyone in particular) lousy new scoring system designed for noob's to win.

The new scoring system allows noob players to spam bigger alliances. In M3 the whole era we had a noob alliance called Tav2 who kept attacking our ops all threw the era. We would lose 1-3 armor units each time and they get score for the attack where all we got was a lose of units with no extra score. We didn't mass attack there colony's because they would be no point to it as we will just be given them alot more score and let them build back easier so they can attack us all over again. One of the guys in the Tav2 kept attacking us getting score wen he killed some units and he lost his and now he is rank 38 because he got score from always attacking us but we got nothing because his power level was always low.This system does encourage people to suicide because even if you suicide u get a good score and you just build your army back for cheaper costs while still keeping the same score. So i don't think the new system is good but that my opinion.

Also the daily bonus is useless how does getting 80 metal or 50 oil or 4 E gonna help. You get more resources per tick then with the daily bonus

The stupidity of BD developers never ceases to amaze me...I swear I will have to pay and put all of you through a proper college for a change (not online degree from University of Chattanooga or wherever you bunch of clueless people graduated from).

The score system is not good and bad, work in progress or anything else. It is complete and total nonsense. Makes less sense than me still playing this game.How can anyone get score from LOSING? Read your damn history books...losers get nothing but the sword. So even thinking about giving someone score from losing a battle is ridiculous.

You want to improve the score system? Takes 50 lines of code and 1 day if you start using your brains for a change:

1. You get 0 score from losing a battle (only get score from winning battles)2. Your power is irrelevant...all that matters is how many units you kill in each battle you win (adjusted for vehs and tanks of course by multiplying by 2 and 3 respectively)3. You get an extra bonus -10% more score let's say for each 10% battle efficiency over 50%. So if you win a battle with 80% efficiency you get 30% more score as bonus.

Simple, reasonable, fair and efficient.

Will you do it? No of course not. You will take another two weeks and come up with an even more idiotic update to the score system. I can bet on it.

D

I believe that if u have read the news feed... u'll recognize something close to 1 is already planned on the next update. Which will award u if u managed to kill more than u lost no matter if u win or lose the battle.

The stupidity of BD developers never ceases to amaze me...I swear I will have to pay and put all of you through a proper college for a change (not online degree from University of Chattanooga or wherever you bunch of clueless people graduated from).

The score system is not good and bad, work in progress or anything else. It is complete and total nonsense. Makes less sense than me still playing this game.How can anyone get score from LOSING? Read your damn history books...losers get nothing but the sword. So even thinking about giving someone score from losing a battle is ridiculous.

You want to improve the score system? Takes 50 lines of code and 1 day if you start using your brains for a change:

1. You get 0 score from losing a battle (only get score from winning battles)2. Your power is irrelevant...all that matters is how many units you kill in each battle you win (adjusted for vehs and tanks of course by multiplying by 2 and 3 respectively)3. You get an extra bonus -10% more score let's say for each 10% battle efficiency over 50%. So if you win a battle with 80% efficiency you get 30% more score as bonus.

Simple, reasonable, fair and efficient.

Will you do it? No of course not. You will take another two weeks and come up with an even more idiotic update to the score system. I can bet on it.

D

I believe that if u have read the news feed... u'll recognize something close to 1 is already planned on the next update. Which will award u if u managed to kill more than u lost no matter if u win or lose the battle.

if you lose the battle that means you will lose all your units, then you get no score regardless how many you killed, is that not the new way?

No need to exclude me I am part of staff and so we try to decide together. Sometimes we don't agree and so we do baby steps as you would say, to see how its going and what advantages/disadvantages the new update has. Nothing is set in stone here. We go with the majority (as long as its reasonable) as our main goal is to give you the game you'd like to play.So please continue with critique and suggestions.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum