Altobelli, David wrote:>> Wouldn't /dev/hpilo/ccbN be a more appropriate namespace?> > Yes, that would be more clear. The code is currently defined to a maximum of 1 hardware device, but this could change, and the dev path should probably reflect that.> > How do you feel about /dev/hpiloX/ccbN, where X is 0, 1, ... Num_Devices-1?

I'd rather see /dev/hpilo/dXcY, the point being to try to declutter the /dev root.