In no way would I send Foster in that deal. Foster is worth more and we could get a lot more for him than just Harrington. Harrington said that hes not happy in GS and wants out. Im sure they're trying to more him also. The trade of Tinsley, Diener and 2nd rounder is a bit better, but I would just keep it at Tinsley and Diener. Considering the fact that Ellis is out with his ankle injury, GS is in need of guards. Theyre only PGs now are Marcus Williams and CJ Watson. Theyre definatley looking for some help.

The only plus I can see for getting Harrington is that he is a $9,226,250 expirer at the end of this season. We definatley wont re-sign him (especially for that kind of money). All Pacer fans should know how Harrington is by now, we've had him play for us 2 different times. If we can get him, just as an expirer, then Im all for the deal

I dont see GS dealing an expiring deal in Harrington for Tinsley. Tinsley has 3 years I believe on his deal and it really wouldnt make sense for them to deal a big for a small. They are going to be banking on Marcus Williams to provide help in the pg spot which I think is a better choice than Tinsley.

I wouldnt deal Foster for Harrington. Foster is not a great defender, but he plays tough and plays inside. He grabs boards and is active on offensive rebounds. I would much rather have his services over Harrington who falls in love with the 3 ball and hates to rebound or play any type of D. GS would do this deal though

I wouldnt deal Foster for Harrington. Foster is not a great defender, but he plays tough and plays inside. He grabs boards and is active on offensive rebounds. I would much rather have his services over Harrington who falls in love with the 3 ball and hates to rebound or play any type of D. GS would do this deal though