@Eldros: sounds a little like Sarah is the material.
–
Paul RuaneDec 1 '10 at 10:16

1

@Ralph Rickenbach: well it seems 'we' would be the correct form in that case but 'us' sounds/feels better.
–
Paul RuaneDec 1 '10 at 10:17

1

@Eldros: I agree with your first and second examples - but completely disagree that "ourselves" could be used instead. I think that "Sarah and us" is the least of 3 evils, but also that this construction is best avoided altogether, and your examples are the appropriate alternatives.
–
Steve MelnikoffDec 1 '10 at 12:38

6 Answers
6

I don't think anyone would word the sentence in the examples provided. It would be either "Sarah is going to build an aircraft with us." or "We are going to build an aircraft with Sarah."

To answer your question directly, I would assume that "Sarah and we are going to build an aircraft" is correct (if you insist on using that word structure), because if Sarah wasn't there it would be "We are going to build an aircraft"

This is an example where prescriptive grammar fails us (in practice I mean). Generations of people have had drummed into them that they must say “John and I went” not “Me and John went”, because of some supposed rule imported from Latin. (See¹ Emonds, J. “Grammatically deviant prestige dialect constructions.”A Festschift for Sol Saporta. Ed. M. Brame, H. Contreras and F. Newmeyer. Seattle: Noit Amrofer, 1985, for why “John and I went” cannot be part of any naturally learnt variety of English).

But “Sarah and we/us” is not frequent enough that phrases like it often come up in pedagogy, so we are left with two unpalatable alternatives: “Sarah and us” must be wrong because “Sarah and me” is wrong; but “Sarah and we” doesn’t sound right either, and we don’t know what to say.

Emonds discusses a number of more complicated cases where people are often unsure about the application of the rule, but I don't remember whether they include this one.

[¹ Edited to correct title of paper and provide proper citation, 3 December 2010. Text available at fine.me.uk, February 2011.]

I would argue for "we" on the grounds that "we went" is just like "I went", plus one, Sarah.
–
RemouDec 1 '10 at 13:49

2

Yes, that is one of the usual arguments. But as Pinker points out (in The Language Instinct) the category of grammatical number does not penetrate inside coordinations [i.e. "I am" does not imply "I and you am/is"], so we have no a priori reason why case should do so.
–
Colin FineDec 1 '10 at 14:50

I googled "A grammatically deviant prestige construction" and all I could find was other places on the Internet where you talked about this paper. Is it available online anywhere?
–
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇Dec 1 '10 at 18:47

Possibly not. I found the reference originally in Pinker's book, and sent off for a reprint. I'll look when I'm at home and see if I can get you a proper reference.
–
Colin FineDec 2 '10 at 12:51

Apologies: I had the title slightly wrong. It's "Grammatically Deviant Prestige Constructions". If you google that, you'll find plenty of references to it, and a few summaries - but not, unfortunately, the paper itself, as far as I can see. I've emailed Professor Emonds to ask if it is, or can be made, available online.
–
Colin FineDec 3 '10 at 15:42

Not really: if there are fifteen-hundred boy scouts in the organisation then it will become a little unwieldy. An besides, by current regulation it would be 'Bob, Sarah and I' as I am a member of the subject not object.
–
Paul RuaneDec 1 '10 at 16:20

As someone stated in another answer, the problem could have been imported from latin. I say what happens in other idioms, it always helps me to realized which ways to take for the logical construction of phrases.

In spanish (latin), you should not use "I" and someone, because is non polite to construct the phrase that way. You are being more important in the phrase so you place yourself first. This speak badly of you. Don't know if that's the exact reason in english but it could be. You resolve a lot of problems writing in that way.

In the case you propose, I see this (I'm not native english, so please educate me):

"Sarah and we are going to build an aircraft."

I help myself with punctuation, it gives just the pauses I need to realize what should be appropriate sometimes. So:

Sarah and I, we are going to build an aircraft.

Sarah and we, we are...

Sarah and us, we are...

Sarah and ourselves, we are...

And following the counsel,

I/Me and Sarah, are going to build an aircraft.

We and Sarah, are...

Us and Sarah, are...

Ourselves and Sarah, are...

The only phrase that doesn't sound or looks odd given the examples is WE, but I think "Sarah and we are going..." it's pretty ambiguous. If you use the comma, you'll see that using it after we, left us with "are going to build an aircraft"... in spanish could be done because the pronoun is tacit but don't know if in english you could do that so simply.

If I was you, I'd use "We and Sarah are going..."
or I use the comma as in "Sarah and we, are going..."

I can't think of a single example where it would be correct to separate the subject from the verb with a comma. Commas in English serve specific grammatical requirements; the fact that they sometimes mark pauses in pronunciation is secondary to their actual function. In other words, you can't put in a comma just because there's a pause there when saying it aloud.
–
MarthaªDec 1 '10 at 17:50

Commonly, as long as I know, is not correct to use commas for another function than the mandatory ones, but if you write a book and want to denote the mood of a conversation you will have to use them. In example: "- But, I recall being... let's say, kind of, aggressive." Is not the same as: "- But I recall being, let's say, kind of aggressive." Maybe is not correct outside a novel, but this clearly has to do with people having no style when their write because they write less than ever. Indeed I'm sure the punctuation became useful to represent time when you speak not the opposite.
–
BilleebDec 2 '10 at 15:48

By the way, you are right that in english is not useful separate the subject from the verb, cause the verb alone says nothing. I clearly err in that.
–
BilleebDec 2 '10 at 15:53

if I were trying to get across the conversational character of your example, I'd write it as: "But-- I recall being... let's say, kind of... aggressive." The point is, a comma does not necessarily imply a pause, not even in informal usage.
–
MarthaªDec 3 '10 at 15:56