Our goal is to serve as a leading-edge resource for companies navigating the rapidly evolving landscapes of the domestic and global energy markets. Moore & Van Allen’s EIB Energy Highlights is a complement to our Energy Interdependency Blog’s in-depth individual treatment of critical issues emerging in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation. EIB Energy Highlights hits the highlights of recent energy developments, streamlining access to critical information for our readers. Subscribe to the Energy Interdependency Blog via email or RSS to ensure that you receive EIBEnergy Highlights, as well as our comprehensive posts. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the materials covered.

Natural Gas

Natural Gas Outlook:U.S.On Track to beNet Exporter Q2 2017: Natural gas production and consumption are expected to rise this year due to increases in natural gas prices and LNG exports, as well as increased electric power generation. As LNG exports and pipeline exports to Mexico continue to rise, the U.S. Energy Information Administration expects the U.S. to be exporting more natural gas than it imports by the second quarter of 2017.

Oil

Exports of U.S. Crude Oil Average 9% Above Last Year, Reach 16 Nations: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) recently analyzed the impact that lifting the restrictions on the export of U.S. crude oil has had on the volume and trajectory of U.S. exports. Crude oil export restrictions were lifted in December 2015, prior to which Canada received the majority of U.S. oil. In the first five months of this year, oil exports averaged 9% higher than the full year average in 2015 and reached sixteen nations, according to the EIA. Exports to other countries surpassed exports to Canada during March and May. Bloomberg reports 87 million barrels of crude oil and condensate were exported from the U.S. in the first half of the year.

Hearing on Clean Power Plan Challenge Approaches: Oral arguments before the en banc D.C. Circuit (minus two judges who have recused themselves) are scheduled to be heard September 27, 2016. The argument has been allotted a little more than three and half hours, and is divided among five categories of issues: (1) All statutory issues other than those related to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 112; (2) Section 112 arguments; (3) Constitutional issues; (4) Notice issues; and (5) Record-based issues not submitted on briefs. Petitioners have argued, among other points, that the CPP is not authorized under CAA Section 111(d) for several reasons, including (a) it is applying standards to the owners/operators of the regulated sources instead of to the sources themselves by requiring owners/operators to subsidize cleaner generation, (b) the requirement to shift generation to cleaner sources in essence requires non-performance or cessation of production from existing sources and therefore is not a valid standard of performance for those sources under the CAA, and (c) it requires stricter standards for existing sources than for new sources, contrary to Congress’ intent to require more stringent standards for newly constructed facilities as it is more cost-effective and feasible. Section 112 prohibits sources that are regulated under that section from also being regulated under Section 111(d). Accordingly, petitioners have argued that the CPP violates Section 112 by “double regulating” coal-fired generation plants.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

FERC Moves to Bolster Electric Grid Cybersecurity: In light of recent cyber attacks on international energy infrastructures, FERC has taken steps towards bolstering the cybersecurity of the U.S. electric grid. On July 21, 2016, FERC issued an Order directing the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to develop a mandatory reliability standard requiring entities to develop a plan with cybersecurity controls for supply chain management of hardware, software, and services connected to the operation of the bulk electric system (BES). FERC also issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) seeking comments on whether Critical Infrastructure Protection Reliability Standards for the cybersecurity of bulk electric system Control Centers should be modified. The reliability standard that NERC must develop will need to address software integrity and authenticity; vendor remote access; information system planning; and vendor risk management and procurement controls. While it would be mandatory under the reliability standard for entities to implement a plan, FERC was clear that it is not directing NERC to set particular controls and it expects the standard to allow flexibility. The NOI solicits feedback specifically on whether: (1) to separate the Internet and BES Cyber Systems in Control Centers performing transmission operator functions; and (2) to implement administration practices that prevent unauthorized computer programs from running on BES Cyber Systems in Control Centers (known as “application whitelisting”).

State of California

California Legislature Passes Bill Setting Reduced GHG Targets for 2030: On August 23 and August 24, 2016, the California Assembly and Senate passed SB 32, which requires that greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to 40% of 1990 levels by 2030. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 already required GHG levels to be at 1990 levels by 2020. SB 32 took the initiative a step further to reduce emissions with an eye towards positively impacting the “state’s most disadvantaged communities.” SB 32 was explicitly dependent upon the enactment of Assembly Bill 197, which, among other initiatives, creates a Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies, adds two Legislative representatives as non-voting members of the State Air Resources Board, and requires the Air Resources Board to prioritize “[e]mission reduction rules and regulations that result in direct emission reductions” from stationary and mobile sources. The requirement to prioritize direct emission reductions has raised questions regarding the impact of the Bill on the future Cap and Trade in the state. Assembly Bill 197 was passed by the Senate and Assembly August 22 and August 24, 2016.

Related

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

Connect to Recent Authors

Brian Heslin:

Mindy Vervais:

Subscribe to Blog Via Email

Email Address

Follow MVA

Blog Topics

Blog Topics

Archives

Archives

Search for:

Our Energy Practice

Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.

Disclaimer

No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.

No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)