Results: :
The fovea-to-disc angle did not correlate well with the locationsof the circumpapillary (cp) RNFL peaks (RSUP=0.09, RINF=0.12)or blood vessels (BVs; RSUP=0.13, RINF=0.14). As suggested,[2]BVs moderately correlated with cpRNFL peak locations (RSUP=0.51,RINF=0.27). The disc radius or the fovea-to-disc distance didnot correlate well with the cpRNFL thickness (R=0.02, R=0.18)or the eccentricity of the peak of the macular RGC+IPL thickness(R=0.13, R=0.12). The macular RGC+IPL peak height moderatelycorrelated with the mean cpRNFL thickness (R=0.37), while themean macular TR thickness did not correlate well with the meancpRNFL thickness (R=0.20).