HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL BE MURDERED BY BLACKS TODAY?..........THE LOOTING ACROSS AMERICA is as black as the staggering murder and crime rates of BLACKS ACROSS AMERICA. Black Lives Matter? NO LIFE MATTERS TO BLACKS!

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Did California Attorney General Kamala Harris Murder An Innocent American Mother -

American Kathryn Steinle's family should blame CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS (LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS) for the death of their beloved daughter and mother!Harris, a LA RAZA hispandering Dem as corrupt as FEINSTEIN, BOXER and PELOSI, made San Francisco into a FREE SANCTUARY CITY for Mexican criminals!As Attorney Gen., it was Harris who declared that half the murders in California were by Mexican gangs. She is fully acquainted with the fact that California has the largest and most expensive prison system in the nation and half the inmates are MEXICANS.HARRIS THINKS SHE WILL REPLACE LA RAZA BARBARA "BRIBES" BOXER IN THE SENATE!

REALLY WANT TO HAND THESE PEOPLE
AMNESTY? THEY ALREADY GET OUR JOBS AND BILLIONS IN WELFARE!

The woman, 32-year-old Kathryn
Steinle (“Kate”), was struck
in the chest with a bullet while visiting Pier 14 on the Embarcadero with her family. She was rushed
to a nearby hospital but doctors were unable to save her, as she died in her
parents’ arms a few hours later.

The suspect,
Francisco Sanchez, was identified as being in his mid-40s and on probation
from Texas due to previous, undisclosed crimes. He was arrested after tips
from passers-by. Officials said that the killing appeared to be random.

Perhaps because of all of these factos, a Reuters poll found that 70% of Americans, including 86% of
Republicans, believe illegal immigrants "threaten traditional U.S. beliefs
and customs," while 63% believe that "immigrants place a burden on
the economy."

Byron York: What is the real
number of illegal border crossings? Washington Examiner

“Until lawmakers end the catch-and-release
policies of the Obama administration,” said Jessica Vaughan of the Center for
Immigration Studies, “any infrastructure improvements, new strategies, and
better metrics are pointless.”

He responded that “he knew San Francisco was a sanctuary city where he would not be pursued by immigration officials.”

“Sanctuary cities” are cities within the United States that refuse to comply with federal immigration laws and authorities—similar to the defiance of Southern states to federal law during the civil rights era.

By some estimates, there are more than 150 U.S. cities that are endangering the safety of their citizens by refusing to turn over dangerous, criminal aliens to the Department of Homeland Security or inquiring about the immigration status of suspects when they are arrested.

So when Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, seven-time convicted felon and five-time deportee, arrived in San Francisco, authorities were none too concerned with complying with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Although ICE had Lopez-Sanchez in custody in March 2015, the agency transferred him to local authorities in San Francisco to be prosecuted on a drug-related charge.

ICE filed an “immigration detainer,” and requested that the San Francisco authorities notify them before releasing Lopez-Sanchez after his prosecution.

For reasons unknown, San Francisco authorities decided not to prosecute Lopez-Sanchez on the drug charge and then blatantly ignored the detainer and the prior request by ICE to return Lopez-Sanchez to its custody.

Instead, they let this killer walk free. Now, Kate Steinle is dead, and her family is left to grieve.
While it was Lopez-Sanchez who pulled the trigger, it was the city council of San Francisco and its mayor who aided and abetted her murder through their defiant, reckless, and dangerous sanctuary policy.

There is no question that this tragedy could have been avoided if not for the San Francisco policy, particularly given that even ICE characterized Lopez-Sanchez as an “enforcement priority,” according to a spokeswoman for the agency.

But San Francisco’s policy is to refuse to “honor U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainers unless they are supported by a judicial determination of probable cause or with a warrant of arrest.”
What should really infuriate the family of Kate Steinle is that this horrible, tragedy could have been prevented.

Not the First Time

It is not the first time convicted felons have been shielded from deportation by sanctuary cities, only to commit violent crimes following their release from prison. It is not even the first time it has happened in San Francisco.

In 2008, the Bologna family suffered the same tragedy. Edwin Ramos, a member of the notorious MS-13 gang, cold-bloodedly murdered three innocent residents, Tony Bologna and his two teenage sons, Michael and Matthew Bologna, on the streets of San Francisco as they came home from a family barbecue.

Like Lopez-Sanchez, Ramos was an illegal alien who took full advantage of San Francisco’s sanctuary policy.Prior to committing the triple murder, Ramos had been convicted of two violent felonies as a juvenile: a gang-related assault and the attempted robbery of a pregnant woman.

But because the city’s policy is to ignore immigration status, federal immigration authorities were never informed that two-time felon Ramos was in the country illegally.

If San Francisco had informed federal authorities of Ramos’ presence and if ICE had picked him up, the murders of three innocent people could have been avoided, just as the murder of Kate Steinle could have been avoided.

Instead, San Francisco along with other cities have created sanctuaries for criminal conduct by aliens, shielding them from the federal government, and enabling them to continue to victimize innocent Americans.

San Francisco and Other Sanctuary Cities Are Breaking the Law

San Francisco is directly violating federal law, as are all of the other sanctuary cities. Under Section 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. §1373), it is a violation of federal law for any state or local government to “prohibit, or in any way restrict” law enforcement or other government officials from sending or receiving information from the federal government on the “citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.”
Instead of comforting the bereaved Steinle family in the wake of this terrible tragedy, President Obama has sought to shift the blame for this incident.

In a statement, White House press secretary Josh Earnest blamed Republican lawmakers for Kate Steinle’s death. “It’s because of the political efforts of Republicans that we have not been able to make the kind of investment that we would like to make in securing our border and keeping our communities safe,” he said.

However, it is the Obama administration that announced in 2010 that it would not sue sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with the federal government on immigration enforcement.

It was the Obama administration that axed a program that made it easier for immigration authorities to find and deport illegal immigrants who had committed local crimes.

Under the Secure Communities program, local jurisdictions had the ability to check whether individuals they arrested were illegally in the U.S. or were “otherwise removable due to a criminal conviction.” If an individual was found to be illegally present, “ICE [would take] enforcement action—prioritizing the removal of individuals who present the most significant threats to public safety.”

But in 2014, the Obama administration got rid of the Secure Communities program, making the bizarre claim that the program’s “very name ha[d] become a symbol for general hostility toward the enforcement of [the nation’s] immigration laws.”

It put in a new, much more limited program, the Priority Enforcement Program (PEP), which only allows ICE to ask local jurisdictions for “voluntary” notification or detainment.

Under the Priority Enforcement Program, ICE has much narrower enforcement priorities and reasons for removing an illegal alien.

In fact, ICE’s enforcement priorities are so narrow today that it has released tens of thousands of dangerous, violent, criminal aliens, from murderers and drug dealers, to kidnappers and robbers, onto the streets—almost 70,000 in just the past two years.

Yet, even with this weakened standard, ICE still issued a detainer for Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, recognizing that he posed a threat to public safety if he remained in the United States.

San Francisco disregarded that detainer, washing its hands of a seven-time felon, and releasing him into an unsuspecting populace.

It seems San Francisco and other sanctuary cities are more concerned with protecting illegal aliens, even those with criminal records, than with protecting innocent citizens like Kate Steinle orTony, Michael, and Matthew Bologna.

HISPANDERING OBAMA HAS NEVER HAD ANYONE ASSEC. OF HOMELAND SECURITY THAT WAS NOT AN ADVOCATE FOR OPEN BORDERS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY ABOVE THE LAW!!!

OBAMA’S OPEN
BORDERS AGENDA WITH NARCOMEX:

Sarah Saldaña, who
will head Immigration and Customs and Enforcement (ICE). She will be the first Hispanic woman to lead the agency.

“She will continue
the pattern of lawlessness perpetuated by thepresident and the
political leadership at the Department of Homeland Security,” Sen. Jeff
Sessions (R-Ala.) said. Congress cannot and must not confirm anyone to lead an
agency in DHS or other law enforcement agency who supports executive amnesty.”

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even
a goal of the department.

ARE WE A
NATION OF LAWS, OR A BORDERLESS ENTITY FOR EASY LA RAZA MEXICAN INVASION ,
OCCUPATION AND LOOTING???MARK
LEVIN on the GOP surrendering to Obama’s LA RAZA SUPREMACY:

"We are not a nation of immigrants. We are a
nation of citizens," Levin said to applause. "I am sick and tired of
the American citizen being demeaned and treated as a second-class citizen while
anybody who crosses the border is treated as the most virtuous human being on
the face of the earth."

The
random, heartless murder of a young tourist on San Francisco's Pier 14 by a
five-time illegal alien deportee who benefited from the "progressive"
city's sanctuary policy has law-abiding Americans, law enforcement officials
and political opportunists of all stripes up in arms.

But for decades, feckless government leaders ignored the pleas of families who
suffered the bloody consequences of open borders.

For every Kate Steinle who died at the hands of an illegal alien sanctuary
beneficiary, there is a Tony, Michael and Matthew Bologna in San Francisco.

As I've reported time and again, liberal "sanctuary" programs in
these metropolitan areas have protected, harbored and enabled criminal illegal
aliens who disappeared into the deportation abyss. Both Democrats and
Republicans, goaded by Big Government and Big Business interests, collaborated
to turn America into a collective sanctuary nation. Non-enforcement is the
rule, deportation evasion is the game, and the country is a safe haven — for
law-breakers from around the world.

Yet, even as born-again tough-on-borders grandstanders now race in front of
cameras to condemn these dangerous policies, churches across the country are
brazenly thumbing their noses at our immigration laws. And political phonies are
doing nothing to stop them.

In Northeast Portland, Ore., the Augustana Lutheran Church is shielding illegal
alien Francisco Aguirre-Velasquez after he committed drunk driving and drug
crimes and violated deportation rules.

In Tucson, Ariz., illegal alien Daniel Neyoy Ruiz took open, public refuge at
Southside Presbyterian Church and then First Christian Church to avoid
deportation. Fellow illegal alien Rosa Robles Loreto has been living at First
Christian for nearly a year.

In Austin, Texas, First Unitarian Universalist church is harboring illegal
alien Sulma Franco after the feds denied her deportation appeal.

In Denver, illegal alien Arturo Armando Hernandez Garcia has taken up long-term
residence at First Unitarian Society of Denver church.

In Chicago, illegal alien Elvira Arellano settled at the United Methodist
Church of Adalberto for a year before finally being ejected back to Mexico.
Last year, the serial law-breaker somehow returned to the Windy City to protest
her status "in the shadows."

The Catholic Church has been at the forefront of the 1960s-era sanctuary
movement, with top officials openly promoting immigration anarchy and
lawlessness among their flock in the name of "humanity" and
"compassion."

As I've long noted, it's one thing to show compassion to legal immigrants,
legitimate refugees and asylees, and those abused and mistreated by smugglers.
It's quite another to conspire against an orderly immigration and entrance
system that imposes common-sense limits, eligibility requirements, criminal
background checks, medical screening and a commitment to assimilation. Catholic
groups have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to building shelters
for illegal aliens from Central America and way stations in southern Mexico.

The unholy alliance between church leaders and the open-borders lobby extends
from the Vatican to Rev. Jim Wallis' Faith in Public Life (FPL) network, the
Los Angeles-based Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE) and the
George Soros-tied Interfaith Worker Justice (IWJ). It's a web of nearly 100
interfaith committees, campus agitators and "workers centers" steeped
in the organizing tactics of Saul Alinsky on behalf of millions of illegal
aliens filling the pews and coffers of their abettors.

Capitol Hill's abdication of its duties to protect and defend our borders is
bad enough. But if people of faith choose to sit silently as a "new
sanctuary movement" of tax-exempt houses of worship defiantly and
recklessly undermines our immigration laws, our national sovereignty doesn't
have a prayer.