Aims to defend the basic inherited Judao/Christian tone and fabric of Australian society at the national level (culturally not doctrinally). Aims to use persuasion and information to eliminate the threat of political Islam. Will engage in activism to prevent the expansion of any illegal activity aimed at expanding Islamic influence, and will seek to influence Law in pursuit of those aims. We will also highlight the threat of Green/Socialist undermining of Aussie society and Law.

koala-1

The Pen is mightier than the sword, but the Pen must sometimes move the sword against corruption if the corrupt are not moved by the pen.. An idea without an implementer is useless. "The Rulers do not carry the sword in vain"Rom 13:4

Thursday, January 15, 2015

The Truth, the Article and the Idiot- OnlineOpinion finally publishes all of it.

THE ARTICLE. (By Babette Francis) Stunned is probably an understatement for how I reacted to OnLineOpinion publishing a remarkably true article about Islam. Here it is ==> "It is Islam, not Islamism"

To save you a few precious clicks and time, I'll reprint the substantial content here:

The main theme is: While the massacre of journalists and cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo in
Paris may have led to some introspective thinking on the part of liberal
editors and media in the democratic West, they still do not seem to
understand that the basic problem is not "Islamism" or "extremism" or
some fringe group of "Islamists" but Islam itself.

The supporting arguments are:

The biggest obstacle to the modernization of Islam is Muhammad
himself. The task of making a man who owned a sword named 'Cleaver of
Vertebrae' compatible with the modern world is not an easy one.

Kilpatrick* went on to list some of Mohammed's deeds, along with Koran and hadith references:

Mohammed married a six- year old girl and consummated the
marriage when she was nine. (Bukhari, 5. 63. 3896) [This is why the
marriage age for girls cannot be raised in countries such as Iran and
Malaysia and in Iran is being lowered from l0 to 9].In violation of Arab moral standards Muhammad married his own
daughter-in-law. (Koran, 33:37) He ordered the beheading of all the men
of the captured Banu Qurayza tribe and the enslavement of the women and
children. According to some accounts, between 800 and 900 men and
adolescent boys were executed as Muhammad and his child bride looked on.
(Ishaq, p. 464)He sanctioned the rape of women captured by his troops in
battle. (Muslim, Vol. 4, No. 1438) After the assault on the Jews of
Khaybar, Muhammad ordered that a leader of the tribe, Kinana bin
al-Rabi, be tortured until he disclosed the location of the group's
treasure. A fire was lit on Kinana's chest but, as he still refused to
reveal the secret, Muhammad had him beheaded. Muhammad had promised
Kinana's young wife, Safiya, to another Muslim, but, after hearing of
her beauty, he went back on his word and took her in "marriage" for
himself. By some accounts, this occurred only hours after he dispatched
her husband. (Ishaq, p. 515; Bukhari, 1. 8. 367).

* Author and Islam scholar William Kilpatrick wrote in Crisis Online Magazine (30/10/14)

Now for the 'Idiot'.
There is a contributor (if he can be called that?) who is utterly bigoted and blind when it comes to this kind of accurate and verfiable information (above). His OnLine Nickname is "Pericles" and whenever anyone makes an entirely valid, well supported point about linking the example and teaching/commands of Muhammad to terrorism today.... or simply asserts that true Islam is as Muhammad lived it above, this Pericles becomes lamentably hysterical and laughably irrational. He couches his irrationality in some 'big' words that most of us need a dictionary to digest, but no amount of perfumed paragraphing or decorated deception can alter the basic fact of his irrationality.
His position is poison! He declares that if you speak 'truth' about Islam and Muhammad, you are stirring up hate for Muslims...... (quote)

Why is it, I often wonder to myself, that some people think that it is
their Christian duty to stir up hatred towards other religions, as this
article does. Is it a hangover from the Crusades? Is it just a revival
of the ducking-stool style of Christianity, where a person is adjudged
evil by their inability to avoid being so defined? Or are we merely
seeing the sad, shrill effluvium of a permanently closed and stunted
mind?They won't go away, of course. Because they are so
convinced that they are "right", that it is somehow their bounden duty
to constantly bombard the rest of us with their vituperative,
spittle-drenched bigotry.

WOW!...... did you get that? So, to report all those horrific things that Muhammad himself did or directly authorized/commanded is... "spittle drenched bigotry" hmm I think this sad character has been trying to make the verbal equivalent of certain rather yucky Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

IMAGINE if someone wrote an article about Nazi death camps in Europe... by Pericles logic, "You are 'stirring up hatred towards Germans/Nazis" which is, I suppose, quite accurate, but more important, quite deserved! But I have never yet seen any of this morons posts that criticize anyone for recounting unpalatable historical facts about any movement or ideology OTHER than Islam, which makes me suspect strongly that he is either married to one, has a close relative who is one, or some similar family connection that evokes his irrational babblings. He seems to have no problem recounting the Inquisition or the Crusades.... not for a moment admitting that to do so might (by his logic) incite vicious hatred against Christians....nope...

CONCLUSION. If you have someone like this raving idiot Pericles in your family circle, for goodness sake shun them to the outer regions of irrelevance.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Our Mission-Background.

History is marked with pivotal moments.

BATTLE for ROMEFor the Romans it was the appoinment of Fabius Maximus as temporary dictator in the face of repeated defeats by Hannibal of Carthage. Army after Roman army had been outwitted and slaughtered by Hannibals better tactics. Now he was at the gates of ROME itself. The decision to appoint Fabius saved Rome. He did not confront Hannibal face to face, but embarked on a geurilla war, scortched earth and attrition. Eventually Hannibal had to simply 'go away' because to stay would mean starvation for his army. Rome, was saved.

BATTLE OF TOURS 732In this battle, the rampaging Muslims from Spain sought to take over France. They slashed and burned their way through the Pyranee mountains and into Frankish territory, but were met by a much smaller but well trained and disciplined army of only infantry... led by Charles (The Hammer) Martel.The Muslims were driven away, soundly defeated, and France was saved.

BATTLE of VIENNA 1683 After a long Muslim siege and invasion, their hordes ended up at the gates of Vienna. The last major stronghold of European civilization was set to be swallowed by the ever advancing merciless Islamic juggernaut.over a hundred thousand Muslim soldiers were poised to strike. Jan III Sobieski, with his Polish cavalry came at the last moment.. "here comes the cavalry" and the Muslim Turks were sent packing never to return.....until now, by stealth and immigration and fertility rate.

Now... the time has come for those who can see the past, predict the future and process current events in that light, who can then choose strategies to influence the social order in the interests of all that is decent, pure and enduring. No such mission occurs in an ideological vacuum, it must have a source an underlying ideology. This blog is of the view that new people make good societies, not new systems. Some systems are more viable than others. Plato covers these in his 5 regimes. Rousseau tried his hand at it in his Social Contract, Robispierre tried it with the French Revolution, Marx thought he had the final answer, Hitler tried his final solution, and they all fell apart. If you begin with a flawed idea, you will end with a disfuntional society. The Enlightenment was in reality the endarkenment, opening human minds to so called 'reason'. But even then, Kant's view of what enlightenment is, was just one of around 50 contemporary viewpoints. No matter what else people think, there is only ONE viewpoint or 'law' so to speak which works. "Do for others as you would have them do for you"..it covers everything, except one. That 'one' is the source of motivation to do just that. If humanity is left to itself, the might is right. The one who has the authority for loving your neighbout is none other than He who said "Hear oh Israel".