On April 27, 2007, this court suspended the respondent, E. Thomas Pyle, III, from
the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 3 months. See In re Pyle, 283 Kan. 807,
156
P.3d 1231 (2007). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of
the disciplinary action.

The Disciplinary Administrator's office has verified that the respondent has fully
complied with the conditions imposed upon him by this court. This court finds that the
respondent, E. Thomas Pyle, III, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of
Kansas.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent be reinstated to the practice
of law in the state of Kansas as of the date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order of reinstatement shall be published in
the official Kansas Reports.