I read your post. Can you find a link to the BBC website where they do say they have the footage from the BBC News 24 "but it doesn't clear the
issue".

I would like to see a link directly to the BBC site. I sent the story to some twit who said it was all faked, I would like to send him a reply
directly from the BBC confirming the story.

Also, I thought they said they lost all their tapes? So if they lost their tapes and can't give a proper answer then how can they say they have the
BBC News 24 tapes but they don't clear the issue.

I saw the BBC news 24 clip and the time is shown on the screen. There are deluded people who want to believe the time has been faked so I would
appreciate a link to the statement from the BBC site. I have visited the BBC site and it is almost impossible to navigate, and obviously they won't
want people to find this story anyway

I mean i just like logical summaries like that...
People are saying this video doesn't prove anything, and they're nitpicking over things, but nothing changes those points you've summarised.

You've gotta look at them all and just think a little bit at least??

And those points are just the tip of the iceberg anyway.

The google censoring is insane..the thought has popped into my mind a few times that...okay this video isnt' a smoking gun so what are they afraid
of? Is there something ELSE they are afraid we may discover from this particular video?

To anyone missing any part of the story, heres a few choice links, mainly video clips. How come they're all staying up now it's well known about? If
they're copyright and get removed quickly shouldn't that be consistent? Funny how they dissapear when the stories emerging but they stop trying to
protect their precious 'copyright' when the dam breaks on the story. Just a thought.

Googlevideo/Youtube initially repeatedly remove the BBC WTC7 reporting videos (above) from their site, yet give up once the story is more widely
known. Difficult to provide a link which proves a temporary abscence of something! But widely discussed and obseerved at the time .

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.