The Victory Hour Jan 19, 2014

TVH-EUROPEAN FRONT

For 3,000 years, Supremacist Jewry has done it’s best to incite and divide every race and creed. Diversity itself provides the most potent antidote to the would-be destroyers of all that is sacred.

The Enemy fears these new tactics most, for good reason…

“From the great African stock were formed three varieties, one peculiarly African, remaining in the continent where it originated; another, the Mediterranean which occupied the basin of that sea; and a third, the Nordic, which reached the north of Europe. These three varieties are the three great branches of one species, which I call Eurafrican, because it occupied, and still occupies, a large portion of the two continents of Africa and Europe.

These three human varieties have nothing in common with the so-called Aryan races; it is an error to maintain that the Germans and the Scandinavians, blond dolichocephals or long-heads (of the Reihengraber and Viking types), are Aryans; they are Eurafricans of the Nordic variety.”

THANK YOU FOR ASSISTING WITH THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCING THIS PROGRAM

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on 01/20/2014, 9:34 and is filed under Max French's The Victory Hour Archives. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

“…. Fischer also avered that “…many of the great Germans had come from racially mixed areas of Germany, [and] that the Nordic race in its pure state had not achieved as much as in a mixed state. There were examples of gifted Mischlinge, such as Pushkin [part-black] and Booker T. Washington [also part black].” He therefore concluded that the Germans were fortunate to have benefited from the Nordic race, but “also from the other racial elements…” Wilhelm Schmidt asserted that race-mixing between the Hamitic and Nordic peoples “gave the Nordic race its special advantage, giving it both its conquering attributes, and, to a lesser degree, the artistic gifts of totemistic town-dwellers, as well as in a great measure the thoroughness, seriousness and conscientiouness of the matriarchal agricultural people.” In addition, Schmidt argued that the Nordic race’s oldest links “stretched deep into Africa and Asia.” If accurate, this negates the argument that the Nordics were “racially pure” and that Scandinavia was their birthplace as a race. Incidentally, Hans Günther regularly depicted the Alpine race as the “ugliest” in his various publications. Hitler is described by Arthur Kemp as “Alpine”. In an attack on Günther, race dynamic theorist Friedrich Merkenschlager stated that southern Germans bore “up to 80 per cent ‘yellow blood’ from the Mongol race.” Otto Hauser wrote that the Alpine was the result of the Nordic race crossing with the Polar (yellow) race. Furthermore, he claimed that the Mediterranean race was the result of the Negro mixing with the Nordic. If correct, this means that a “bastardized, negrified” race surpassed the civilizational level of the “pure Nordics” in Scandinavia. Classical Greece and Rome were both Mediterranean products, not Nordo-Scandinavian products. In the end, the Nordicists were not only forced to come to terms with racial mixing but they also conceded that the Nordic race was “frequently understood as related to, or hybridized with, the Phalian race.” Notions of race purity were irretrievably out the door.”

Outstanding! This is the very kind of serious intellectual discussion that we need to be engaged in and at many different venues. Ahmed did a stupendous job researching and delivering the results of his homework on the Topic! Much appreciated and I might add that the enemy knows this is the crux of the matter. Our very essence. It;s in our ancient past, our oral traditions and DNA. Just take a good critical look. As it is said amongst my Pnaci ancestors; “We are all related”. More truth to that simple sentence than one can begin to fathom. This is such a good topic to explore that you must do it again! May we NOT be diverted, distracted or divided as our common enemy seeks all of the above as to keep us under THEIR thumb. We must rise and become wise as serpents. Just as the man from Galilee had so stated! Love it, fellows. Was applauding you and nodding my head in agreement all along! Kudos and salutations on a most stimulating and informative broadcast.

interesting, but I would not trust these gene pool tests, at least the way they try to categorize genes. Because, as your guest at the end claimed, the test revealed, is that he has a little Sephardic jewish gene.

I mean come on. Sephardic Jewish gene?
It sounds like a lot of crap.
Just, more Jewish crap to claim that they have racial and genetic roots.

They are not first peoples and if anything the Jews have borrowed heavily from everyone else.

If these tests are “scientific”, which I am sure they are as far as gene detection goes. But, a Jewish category in genes is definitely not Scientific; and so these tests results are biased at best.

The last thing we need is for folks and people to be identified as to how Jewish they are, as by their genes.

I did not say I had a Sephardic Jewish gene. I said that according to the results, a high number of Sephardic Jewish people also share that mtDNA (maternal DNA marker). It’s not a Sephardic Jewish gene, just a gene that a lot of Sephardic Jews seem to have.

Maybe it’s because more Sephardic Jewish people are being tested and their sample size is higher. Maybe it’s a good idea for more people to get tested so we can get a clearer picture. What is beyond question is the Y-DNA and mtDNA and what you belong to.

At any rate, when can we decide what is scientific or not? Should we only accept scientific information when it agrees with our pre-conceived notions?

“You may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time.”
– Abraham Lincoln

“O Mankind, We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know each other. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of God is he who is the most righteous of you” (Quran 49:13).

“These are the deeply embedded ideals of Islam which still bring people to this way of life even though Muslims are not on the best level of Iman (belief)today. This is what changed the heart of a racist Malcolm X when he performed Hajj in Makkah. This is the power that brought Muhammad Ali to Islam. This is what still attracts the Untouchables of India towards Islam. This is the theory which convinced noted historian Professor A.J. Toynbee in 1948 to say that: “The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the outstanding achievements of Islam, and in the contemporary world there is, as it happens, a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue.”
may we live up to these ideals.

Thank you for an excellent treatment of this subject. “Nordicism” in its various forms came about basically in the 19th and early 20th century when, due to the industrial revolution and colonial expansion, the mostly Protestant nations of North-Western Europe and their New World colonies had a very significant economic, military and educational advantage over the rest of the world, including the much more backward mostly “non-Nordic” countries of Eastern and Southern Europe. In 2013 when we see nations such as China, India, Brazil and others rising as world powers it becomes more evident than ever how ridiculous such “chosen race” theories, inevitably tied to a particular short period of world history, are.

I have a few questions for the guest if I may.
If we really are all ‘the same’ as the guests points out, then why are organ transplants rejected from those outside of ones race?
Why is bone marrow from another race rejected?
Furthermore, in the canine world, a maltese and dalmation are related to wolves, but are they ‘the same’?
I smell a con here but cant place it.

Thanks for your comments. You’re absolutely right! That’s why I chose the picture I did to spark some critical thought. If you transpose the hair/eye/skin colors of those two females would you be able to tell the difference? Add to that the fact that we are starting to understand these new and relatively recent mutations that account for virtually all the superficial changes.

Once you take in the new information we are getting with DNA, the older cultural/anthropological information we already had (but chose to ignore), the picture will not be as rosy coloured or clear as some people want to believe.

Even the great power of the Catholic Church couldn’t stop the eventual vindicaton of Galileo.

Aryans: Only when a new live style of farming was first developed by some populations at the beginning of the Neolithic era certain traits could thrive and form a new farmer archtype.As differentiated from hunter arch type:gentiles and pastoralist arch type:jews [who use dis-honest methods in exploitation] This new farmer arch type is expressed as honest universalists unwilling to victimize others for their own benefit.These where the original Aryans [root ‘ar-ya= “soil tiller”]the first bearers of the swastika.Jews refer to Aryans as “Amalek”,meaning “valley dweller”,consistent with early farm settlements being based around river basins.The swastika [sun worshipping symbol] can be found in most continents,so Aryanism is NOT ethno specific.

Did you listen to the program? I’m not sure where I said we are all “the same”. Rather, I said the opposite. On the contrary, we touched on the mutations that man is constantly undergoing, ensuring a constant differentiation and branching out.

Are you in the market for an organ?

To be totally honest, I don’t know much about organ transplants, but can you explain what you mean by “rejected outside of ones race?” Please quantify “race” in the context of organ transplantation? Are we talking about close relatives? Do you mean to imply that organs between white people are completely interchangeable?

The bulk of my conversation was discussing anthropology and DNA, specifically Y-DNA. For obvious and apparent reasons, organs can’t really play a significant part in ancient anthropology or archaeology.

However, I must admit that I am intrigued by this concept of organ transplant compatibility to define race. How can we use this concept to try and classify the dead?

“The Modern and Contemporary Greek people is a multiracial mixture. Since acceptance of the jurisdiction of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate at Constantinople was, in practice, the exclusive criterion of being regarded as Greek, it goes without saying that Modern Greeks are descendants of all the Balkan’s Christian nations – and mainly of Albanians, Slavs, and Romanians.[20] Civil strife flourished in such an ambiance; and democratic/socialist ideas thrived as well.”

Dimitris Michalopoulos
Dimitris Michalopoulos holds a doctorate in History from the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris. He has been a lecturer and assistant professor at the University of Salonica, professor at the Naval War College of Greece, and director of the Museum of the City of Athens. His biography on Eleutherios Veniselos has recently been published in Greece.

“We have this folk of ours that is not to be defined as a race,and this is now clear to millions.However,when I began my career twenty-five years ago,this was not the case,then I was always told by bourgeois circles: “Yes,folk and race are one and the same.” No,folk and race are not the same! Race is a component of blood- a blood kernel,but a folk is very often composed not of one but of two,three,four or five different blood kernels.”-AH