so they leave it. I guess liberalism translates well worldwide: It's okay so long as YOU'RE experience something I don't have to...although I STILL support it(in this case , it being multiculturalism).

so they leave it. I guess liberalism translates well worldwide: It's okay so long as YOU'RE experience something I don't have to...although I STILL support it(in this case , it being multiculturalism).

Correct. People are talking (supporting) things they know nothing about.

__________________

"Is not our role to stand for the one thing which means our own salvation here but with which it will also be possible to save the world, and with which Europe will be able to save itself, namely the preservation of the white man and his state?" Dr Hendrik Verwoerd

South Africa is the frontline of WN, and its success and failure will define the rest of the WN movement. If White people fail to awaken and unite when face with genocide, then there is no hope anywhere else. But South Africa is also the future of WN, it is a gateway into a mineral/oil/farm rich continent, and with this prize, we can usher in a new WN Golden Age.

There is more hope for the success of WN in Eastern Europe then there will ever be in SA.

__________________

“...the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.”
- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

The big thing about Apartheid at the time, the thing that caused the huge international outcry, was that they weren't allowed to vote, so it wasn't democratic

The reason for this was because the Africans here live under a tribal system with a King - Africans dont know about voting - it would have been a good idea for the Apartheid government to give them voting rights in their own parts of the country, but I believe even this would have failed because it was never about voting rights or racism, but about the minerals that the NWO wanted. What easier way to strip the country dry then putting a black in power

The reason for this was because the Africans here live under a tribal system with a King - Africans dont know about voting - it would have been a good idea for the Apartheid government to give them voting rights in their own parts of the country, but I believe even this would have failed because it was never about voting rights or racism, but about the minerals that the NWO wanted. What easier way to strip the country dry then putting a black in power

Well, originally they had their own homelands, de facto countries, with their own governments, presidents and voting rights, but those all went back to true Africa, then they wanted SA.

Well, originally they had their own homelands, de facto countries, with their own governments, presidents and voting rights, but those all went back to true Africa, then they wanted SA.

What you`re talking about is a voting system, like democracy - the Zulus still have a king, he`s not a president, he`s a King - they dont vote him in, he gets "installed" (monarchy) - Democracy is a western thing

After his 21st birthday and his marriage, Zwelithini was installed as the eighth monarch of the Zulus at a traditional ceremony at Nongoma on 3 December 1971, attended by 20,000 peopleRoyal Zulu Monarch

What the NWO wanted was a union between black and white in SA with voting rights for everybody like we have today - the Zulu still wants no part of democracy but wants to rule themselves

If a goat can't eat, spend or wear a vote, it's not interested. Democracy is a foreign concept to Africans, forced on them by the Western worlds guilt for thinking that they did not do enough. The problem is, they did too much. If they had walked away from Africa, there would now be no resistance to colonialism of any kind at this point. There would be no more Africans.