Sunday, March 16, 2014

The Imposition of The New World Order (NWO) and Global Governance

"We shall have
world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent."Statement by Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee
on February 17th, 1950

To achieve ‘world government’
money is needed and a monetary system has to be in place. This is already here.
Most countries in the world have central banks who in turn report to the Bank
of International Settlements (BIS). This could be called “The World Banking
Politburo.” [1]

Central Bankers are the
controllers and issuers of money.Bankers dictate austerity programs through the auspices of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), and governments of all countries whether
capitalist, communist, conservative, liberal, socialist or despotic all are
mostly under the monetary control of the central bankers. Bankers have proposed
a single world monetary system.

The unelected central bankers
are in attendance at G20 meetings as are representatives of governments and
dictatorships.

The European Union was formed
without a vote of all its peoples’ in different countries. National sovereignty
has been surrendered to technocrats, bureaucrats, bankers and the unelected.
The Euro Observer of December 9, 2011 stated: “…almost all fiscal
policy-making would be taken out of the hands of national assemblies and
delivered up to European civil servants.”I believe the people are being betrayed by their puppet political
“leaders.” Democracy has been ditched and political treason abounds. [3a] Referendums are refused and
restrictions imposed. The monetary crisis has been collectivized and bankers
sanitized. The people are ignored and austerity is the final solution of the
banking elite. A smell of fascism is in the air and the perverted money system
is in the hands of the money-changers who hold the power by appointment rather
than by political approval by election or referendum. Democracy is dead in Europe slain by the banking elites. [3] Still, “global economic
governance…” is on the agenda as witness the quote below:

“The Group of Twenty
("G-20") nations, the new Financial Stability Board
("FSB"), and the International Monetary Fund ("IMF") are
progressing on two fronts: the monitoring and revision of national and regional
economic plans to facilitate global economic governance…”

Lest we in North
America think this cannot happen here, it already is. A North
American Union is already in motion, though it is being called “Beyond Borders.”[4] Of course, the politicians tell us it’s all about
creating jobs and security, (they always tell us that) and who could be against
that, even if your national sovereignty is signed away? Let’s face it do we
really believe the politicians dreamed up all these “deals” on their own? Are
there powerful forces behind the scenes pushing the agenda and hiding out of
sight? For instance, our own P.M Harper scurried over to Davos – where the
elites meet – to announce changes to Old Age Security (OAS). One would have
thought he would have done this in Parliament first? But, no he did not.
Surely, the globalist elites of the world [5]
are not pulling his strings? Still Mr. Harper is on record as saying:

“We need some semblance of global governance” [6]

When did Canadians agree to
‘global governance?’ Was it on the ballot in the last election? Is Stephen
Harper, who was running around electioneering during the last election -
sometimes wearing a jacket with Canada
emblazoned all over it – really hiding his true intentions and globalist
leanings?Was he just seeking votes?
Does he have a hidden agenda to give away Canada’s national sovereignty?Is he being influenced by powerful people or
by people in other countries who are also undermining their own countries
sovereignty? (Europe is one example where
puppet politicians have signed away national sovereignty and unelected
“technocrats” have taken over) Surely, if Mr. Harper cared about Canada and
Canadians he would not have said the words below?

“I know some people don’t like it, it’s a loss of
national sovereignty” Stephen Harper[6]

One wonders, how do the people
in his Tory party feel about the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Do they care?
Or do they follow Mr. Harper blindly? Are the speech writers and political
flacks who surround Mr. Harper are they okay with the ‘loss of national
sovereignty?’ Does the perks of the job mean more than loyalty to ones country?
Do the MPs who serve under Mr. Harper and the opposition MPs have any thoughts
on Canada’s
‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Do these MPs care about Canada’s ‘loss
of national sovereignty?’ Have any of them spoken out in defence of Canada?

What about the Canadian
media? Have any of them raised the alarm on the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’
Has it been front page news in any of the corporate owned newspapers? Have any
of the corporate owned TV stations who are always boasting that they bring the
news to the people: Have any of them done an in depth investigation of the
‘loss of national sovereignty?’ What about the big business elites, do they
care about the ‘loss of national sovereignty?’ Does money and profits count
more than allegiance to Canada?

I believe ordinary people around
the world are being deceived by their leaders. A globalist elite [5] appear to be in control. And this
is easily done through controlling the money system. Therefore, the NWO and
global governance can be imposed.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another
far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial
control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country
and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a
feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by
secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of
the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland,
a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were
themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its
government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign
exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to
influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the
business world.”