some sources say he was quite pale, and he may have had red hair, which explains the relative pale skin also. He also calls people from Ethiopia "raisin heads" suggesting he did see Arabs as superior to other people.

But I am not sure that you can say he was a "racist" in the modern sense. He did have some quirky ideas though, for example that "black" people are that colour because of their sins or their ancestors sins. True, today many would call him a racist, but in his times this very notion did not yet exist.

…The ideology of Islam is every bit as loathsome, nauseating, oppressive and dehumanizing as Nazism. The massive immigration of Islamists into Denmark is the most devastating event Danish society has suffered in recent historical times.”

It seems the fact that Mohammed was "white" had enough importance to be recorded for future generation Muslims to read about their prophet, the video presentation shows clearly parts in the respective ahadiths where Mohammed's skin colour has enough relevance to be spoken of.

Seemingly, white skin had much more significance than any other colour, otherwise it would not have been important enough to write about.

Yes, this is true... But he is also portrayed as being "whiter" than his fellow tribesmen, and I am not sure what people tried to say by this.... it does suggest at least a more complex reason that base racism.

Often in hot countries being relatively pale is a sign of "nobility" (it is a person who does not need to work in the blazing sun). So perhaps the accounts that describe Mohammed as unusually pale were trying to emphasise his "special" status within his own tribe?

You find this idea to this day and in Asia many women spend a fortune on skin whiteners, just as people in Europe spend bag-loads of cash on tanning products.

AlexmenCorn wrote:"Are you saying that Muhammad is the false prophet in Revelation? If so, how can this be? Muhammad is not a Jew? Or am I misunderstanding you?"

Another good example of doctrine induced blindness.Where does the book of Revelation say the false prophet must be a Jew?

AlexmenCorn:

Mohammed is a false prophet according to the Bible, he was not of Jewish heritage,and he came with a different message, to previous Bible prophets.

Mohammed's "message"was to physically fight people until they accepted his "greatest" familiar pagan idol Allah, as the only god worthy of worship, to view Non Muslims as the "enemy "who must be fought against.

This does not correspond to what the prophets of the Bible preached, which was to repent from sin and to follow the Commandments of Yahweh, the Bible God, to be in obedience to Him.

These Commandments are in line with what is known as the Golden Rule, where you treat your fellow human as you yourself would like to be treated, and most, it not all humans, do not want to be treated as enemies, to be fought against, until they accept a pagan idol for a god.

Mohammed claimed to represent the God of the Bible, but by obeying the Quran, he actually diametrically opposed the commandments of the very God he claimed to represent.

Mohammed was a false prophet, who deceived, and is still deceiving many.