Jew Identity: Non-White, Anti-White

THE JEWS have noticed that White racial consciousness is growing. A few are freaking out and screeching to each other that Trump’s selection and the rise of the Jew-aware alt-right is why Jews, as Jews, should freak out and screech more. This hysterical reaction, which only further exposes Jew malevolence and power, is collective. It is what they are. The Internet merely amplifies their Jewing, allowing more of us to see it more clearly.

The essence of Jew identity is inherently schizophrenic — a loud-furtive tribe of name-changing shape-shifting fraudsters who insist they are the victims of the many peoples they’ve parasitized and ultimately offed. They have thrived as a group because they are so keenly aware of themselves as a group, but also because they are aware that they thrive at the expense of others, their hosts, whose awareness Jews spend a great deal of effort monitoring and ruthlessly manipulating — to suppress or redirect toward their own ends.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy is a Jewsmedia Jewess whose long-term special concern has been to Jewsplain, specifically to Jews, how two toxic Jew-driven anti-White memes — that Jews are White, and that “White privilege” is evil — are colliding, and how this collision might ultimately not be good for the Jews.

I have lived for 26 years under the illusion that I am unconditionally white, for example, and in pictures recently I have started looking at my face and going, oh man, do I look too Jewish? I’ve never done that before or at least not since I was 13 and like comparing myself to girls wearing Abercrombie.

Brownstone was describing her concern about an impending alt-right revolution. She explicitly connected her antipathy for “a bunch of gun nuts shooting people” to her own conflicted self-image — a lifetime comfortably posturing as White while simultaneously seeing herself and her own violent, nutty tribe as separate from and at odds with Whites:

It’s just really weird to see this rise of anti-semitism, and think about kind of umm the historical pathway that even got my family on this continent and I know that, Eli, you share kind of a similar history. But I feel like there are ghosts that live in our blood and those ghosts are telling us to run or to remember the revolutions that our families survived and to look out for the signs that are happening now.

History is kind of umm weird because Jewing. As White racial consciousness rose a hundred years ago Jews as a group were compelled, by the Whites who ostensibly still governed America at that time, to resolve the weirdness, to present an argument that Jews were racially “White”. Galvanized by this threat to their Jewness a few Jews went through the required motions. At the same time, other Jews set out to remove the threat by constructing anti-”racism”.

In one sense, pale-skinned American Jews are only now experiencing a shift in our racial self-conception. But if you step back and look at how these same Jews — specifically, the Jewish girls — often experience their teen and preteen years, it starts to seem as if maybe this experience of racist anti-Semitism isn’t entirely new.

And it feels a bit full-circle-ish, I must say, when you learn (on Facebook, where else?) that your 13-year-old self’s Abercrombie-girl equivalent now supports Trump.

Bovy, like Brownstone, clearly sees two separate groups — Jews, whom they identify and sympathize with, versus Whites, whom they don’t. They act conflicted because there is a conflict, and they know they are on the Jew side, against Whites.

No group is more conscious of race and identity than Jews, who are well aware of the privilege they enjoy when Whites mistake them as White. They never tire of expressing their dislike and distrust for Whites, but also recognize the value of the error, the advantage it provides them to manipulate White thoughts and actions: “As a White, I think my fellow Whites suck.” At other times, especially when such goyposing fails, they revert to more explicit Jewing: “As a Jew, I can’t believe this craaaaaazy anti-Semitism exists, shut it down.”

But when I see “white women” posts from white Jewish women, I pause. Are we white women? Today? That is, are we complicit in what’s just happened?

The short, honest answer is no, Jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White. But while Brownstone and Bovy provide one of the more blatant examples, it isn’t the only one.

Another Jewsmedia Jewess, Emma Green, coyly asks Are Jews White? (This article was published by The Atlantic, a “Jewish Commentary” in the same sense as The Jew Republic.) Like Bovy, Green blames all this Jewy double-talk, which has been going on forever, on the alt-right and Trump.

On the extreme right, Jews are seen as impure — a faux-white race that has tainted America. And on the extreme left, Jews are seen as part of a white-majority establishment that seeks to dominate people of color. Taken together, these attacks raise an interesting question: Are Jews white?

“Jewish identity in American [sic] is inherently paradoxical and contradictory,” said Eric Goldstein, an associate professor of history at Emory University. “What you have is a group that was historically considered, and considered itself, an outsider group, a persecuted minority. In the space of two generations, they’ve become one of the most successful, integrated groups in American society — by many accounts, part of the establishment. And there’s a lot of dissonance between those two positions.”

There’s that weird, Jewed history again. The tales Jews tell only seem paradoxical and contradictory to those who refuse to accept their implication. Jews, as a group, see themselves as distinct from and at odds with Whites. The confusion on this point persists because Jews foment and perpetuate it. While fewer Jews may believe that masquerading as White is still what’s best for the Jews, they all peddle a version of history which hinges on the same stark distinction: excusing Jews, faulting Whites.

Green’s coy bit triggered a Jewlash much like the one just a week earlier, and for the same reason — Jews lash out in anger when their Jewing gets exposed. Green responded with Jews and the Social Construction of Race. The first article rehashed the old Jew narrative on race, “It’s complicated, goyim, trust me.” The second article taps a more up-to-date Jew narrative, “It’s imaginary, goyim, trust me.”

“Race” is a historically contingent and subjective category that is used to justify violence against minority groups. I specifically wrote about American Jews because their experiences — which are incredibly diverse and varied — show the hypocrisies and limits of these racial categories. Looking at the historical experiences of this one particular group, and the present-day tensions its [sic] faces, is a means of critiquing the way “whiteness” is used to delineate who is and isn’t considered powerful and valuable in society.

A lot of people seem to feel strongly that talking about Jews in terms of race — even to challenge the notion that Jews could ever fit neatly into a single racial category, which is what my article is about — is thought-provoking or, at worst, dangerous.

Here’s what I’d say to these objections: Racial categories exist in American society. Everyone — including and especially Jews, a group that is arguably constructed not just around religious identity, but also ethnicity — has to grapple with their relationship to those racial categories. As I argue in the piece, racial categories are flawed, socially constructed, and ultimately premised on control and power. But ignoring questions about race is not a way of bringing about racial justice or overturning white supremacy. It’s a way of stifling understanding, debate, and awareness.

Many Jews realize they can’t talk about race without contradicting themselves, so they try to forbid the subject to everyone. Many others instead embrace the sort of weaponized racial double-talk Green uses in her second article — an overtly anti-White narrative about “white supremacy” and “control and power”, constructed by Jews inside universities and broadcast to the masses by their corporate media. Both of Green’s narratives hammer home the same point. Jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White.

Ruiz-Grossman also apparently believes that Jews in America have been hiding behind their “skin privilege” instead of being at the forefront of the civil rights movement. Perhaps Ruiz-Grossman never learned that Henry Moskowitz, an Ashkenazi Jew, was one of the founders of the NAACP in 1909, and that many, if not most, of the civil rights attorneys fighting for racial equality in the South in the 1950’s and 1960’s were Jewish. Maybe she never learned that half of the famous volunteer “freedom riders” in the early 1960’s were Jewish, or that it was the murder by the KKK of three such freedom riders, two Jews, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, along with an African-American, James Chaney, that helped galvanize the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

As if ignoring Jewish history in America is not enough, Ruiz-Grossman also disregards her own Jewish identity and Jewish history by characterizing herself and presumably all (Ashkenazi) Jews as “white.”

This is wrong and offensive. Anyone that understands Jewish history as well as the history of the entire development of the idea or construct of the “white race” should understand how that no Jew, Ashkenazi or otherwise, is “white.”

Ashkenazi Jews have been the victims of European and Western oppression and violence for centuries precisely because they were perceived as not being a part of the “white” world, beginning with the Roman colonialism of Judea and continuing through the 20th Century with arguably the worst genocide in history based on racial classification, the murder of more than 6 million, primarily Ashkenazi Jews, precisely because they were non-whites. The characterization of Jews as now somehow “white” and beneficiaries of “white privilege” is one of the main fallacies behind the relatively recent identification of some self-identified progressives with the demonization of Israel, a hateful cause to wipe off the map the world’s only Jewish state and to once again destroy the indigenous homeland of the Jewish people.

This is not merely a semantic issue. Jews are not “white.” We are a tribal people from the Levant. Many of our people were forcibly exiled out of and into other nations, including in Europe, where we were taken in chains and often subjected to brutal and oppressive institutional racism based on our ethnicity, tribal affiliation, culture and faith. For thousands of years, including nearly 2000 years where the majority of the Jewish people lived without the protection or comfort of having a Jewish homeland, we still maintained our indigenous culture, passing on from generation to generation our traditions, our language, and our sacred texts, all of which are entirely based on our indigenous tribal faith and affiliation. To call us “white,” when the notion of a “white” race was created by indigenous Europeans as a basis for supporting the “White Man’s Burden” and European imperialism, which certainly persecuted and oppressed Jews, in addition to numerous other non-Europeans, is a gross travesty and distortion.

No one that wants to end anti-Semitism and to fight against bigotry and racism should be claiming that Jews are “white.” People who try to depict or describe Jews as “white” are (albeit likely unintentionally) nullifying Jewish history and identity, and they are (again albeit likely unintentionally) essentially supporting Western imperialism, or at least it’s cultural imperialism, by imposing an artificial European creation (of a “White people”) on Jews — who regardless of our shade or whether we are Ashkenazi, Sephardic, or Mizrahi — are genetic brothers and sisters who have more in common genetically with each other than with most ethnic Europeans or “whites.”

Read that last paragraph again. Same anti-White Jew narrative, yet another form. This is the ordinary Jew-sixpack’s take on the weaponized double-talk produced by more subtle, polished Jews, though his point about genetics is something none of them would be foolish enough to mention.

7 Comments

There is an issue, which almost never tries or analyzes, and is that the jewish community historically has not wanted to blend truly there where he was going.

We know that anteponian their religious beliefs to their race, and that has been the conviction that they themselves have suffered. Perhaps if there had been no the historical character of Christ, things could not have been otherwise, and the jews would dominate the whole planet Earth. How did not occur as well, you can understand is a gated community where related to race with religion according to that time. However, this is not the case with other religions where the racial purity is not synonymous to belong to the Jewish community.

The Jews themselves promote the superiority of the white race, as we have seen in certain moments or even with other ethnic groups or races that are Jewish ( but black ) and you look with a magnifying glass your income in Israel. In addition, we have the racial mix intended exclusively with the white race ( see the Jewish nation in the area of Russia, before the Second World War ).

In summary, the Jewish community has not been able to reach the goal to absorb the Europeans have tried for centuries, but the Christianity it has been prevented, so that we can also say that the Christian religion is also higher than with the western culture ; that rejected their Jewish teachings.

Attempts in the s. XX, as algunons Jews ( not all ) between which are located through the masonry, led to reverse this history and that religious and moral superiority, even believed that won or got the victory, for decades the people begins to awaken the great lethargy that has been intentionally caused.

Another way to look at it, it would be, the theories known to achieve certain posts or positions of power would be the domain of the West, but that domain is circumstantial and therefore already referred to the period of the Second World War.

This ambiguity racial and religious ( and ) many times has produced a defense to their interests as a community to the world, but to change times and due to the anti-European plans their tactics are returned against themselves, and, all being supremacist ; taking advantage of the errors of the western or internal quarrels among Europeans by private materialistic purposes, where it is well known that were almost always the financial elite groups.

As true as that Hitler had more than 150,000 Jews in the German Army, some of these Jews with the rank of general military ( ).

And, as true, as in the famous fields of concentration and control of subversive people ( where there were Jews also ) in the Second World War internees had ¡ stations of radio frequency to contact with the Resistance !, then and even after no one knew nothing of soaps, gas chambers, torture, and much less of holocaust. It is propaganda that suffers all the West and that makes countries like Germany this still occupied and dominated by the Masonry benefited from them again taking advantage of the feelings of the western and Christian morality.

As true as that the American General Patton was killed with poison, commissioned by the Masonry, his crime was to speak badly of the Jewish community ( Freemasonry mainly ) and expose the facts in the first person. That was intolerable, could not be allowed those things, because the business for all kinds of companies could jeopardize and expectations would not be achieved.

As true as that there were killings against military personnel living in the famous King David Hotel, in Palestine, in addition to Jews injured and killed at the hands of -Irgum- also, and other Zionist terrorist groups ; that would be the origin of the beloved Israel.

The short version: folks should always keep in mind
that the Jews are nothing more than a highly
sophisticated group of arch criminals. Al Capone was
satisfied with just Chicago. The far more
sophisticated criminal Jews have established
a so-called “state” on the shores of the Levant,
far more larger than the “turfs” of Chicago!
With no clearly defined boundaries, this enclave
serves as a nexus for their worldwide criminal
activity. Even Big Al never had access to nukes!

Jews know very well they are not White and are taught so from a very young age. If they were, in fact, White, why would they feel the need to check all immigrants to Israel for the specific Jewish gene that they know Whites do not possess? If one cannot proves one’s Jewishness back 2-3 generations, a DNA test is required to move to Israel. This is the law there. If they were White people, why would they be looking for a biological marker that’s unknown in the White race in order to immigrate?

Unfortunately for the Jews, they know they are a mixed race people. Just looking at all the swarthy and caramel-skinned people that fill videos of street scenes in Tel Aviv or promotional clips of young Jews making their “birthright” trip is proof enough that they are a wildly mixed group of people. Even so, there is an x-factor that unites them, the Jewish gene that transcends skin color. That’s why there are even Chinese Jews (Kaifeng) that have immigrated to Israel. What about those Ethiopian Jews, too? The famous Jew-fro kinky hair quality is also clear evidence that Jews possess on average 13% African DNA, according to analysis. No, Jews are not White at all, so they needn’t worry about it–but that’s one reason why they hate us–because research consistently shows Whites have remained largely unchanged genetically over millennia, even in spite of endless attempts to ruin our genetic homogeneity. Any effort by Jews to try to convince Whites that they’re struggling with an identity crisis as to whether they’re White or not is just an attempt to deceive Whites that they don’t, in fact, have a rabidly conscious or casually subconscious tribal instinct that is dangerous to their very existence.

Below is an article from the Times of Israel. In it, the author explains why she cringes when people call her White. You can actually hear her disdain for Whites in every word. This attitude is all too typical of Jews.

This article from the Washington Post is by a Jewish author that closely mirrors Mr. Danzig’s sentiments from above. In it, he bemoans that Jews “tried to become White” but had to abandon that noble effort in order to work against “racism” and save brown people when Whites just became too deplorable to associate themselves with. It should be noted that no one “becomes White” any more than they become Black, Asian, Mestizo or anything else. Your genes are what they are, but then the Jews already know that.

Sorry the comment didn’t come through the first time. We have to manually approve all comments, so on rare occasions our editors are all busy at the same time and comments have to wait a day or two for approval. Secondly, we receive hundreds of spam comments every day that are filtered out by an automated system — and every now and then the system generates a false positive. Thanks for being patient with us.

“Unfortunately for the Jews, they know they are a mixed race people. Just looking at all the swarthy and caramel-skinned people that fill videos of street scenes in Tel Aviv or promotional clips of young Jews making their ‘birthright’ trip is proof enough that they are a wildly mixed group of people.” When I read that, I thought of the slide reproduced at the following link, which bluntly and correctly states, “The Jew is a bastard”:

Swarthy Israeli jews are far preferable to the inbred creatures of the European diaspora that now lecture N. American and European whites on politically correct behavior. The former can’t make the statement starting with “We white people must” followed by another dictate.

I think I know what you’re getting at, but saying that one group of Jews is preferable to another is hardly the best way of framing the issue. In their work of subversion, the Jews not only divide labor among themselves, they also combine it for themselves. To use the biblical phrase, they’re united “as one man,” and they should be judged accordingly. As William Pierce wrote in his review of Max Dimont’s The Indestructible Jews:

“The interesting thing about Dimont’s book — or, rather, about its being published as a mass-circulation paperback — is that it pulls two previously separate Jewish worlds together: the exotic world of the nutty, hate-filled, Talmudic Jews like Rabbi Kahane, who read and write The Jewish Press, and the everyday world of the smooth, sophisticated Jews like Henry Kissinger, who wheel and deal and conduct our affairs of state for us. It pulls them together and makes us realize that they are one and the same world: the Jewish world.

“No book before The Indestructible Jews has made available to Gentiles such a clear picture of the dual nature of this Jewish world. Dimont’s semi-frank exposition of the unique Jewish national existence, partly in Zion and partly in the Diaspora, is fascinating.

“Basically, he sees the world as a big cattle ranch, in which the Jews are the cowboys and everyone else — the goyim — are the cows (goyim has a double meaning in Hebrew: Gentiles — and cattle, or livestock). The cowboys out among the herds, keeping the cattle out of mischief and seeing that they get enough grass and water, are the Diaspora Jews, while those back at the ranch house, tending to the tackle, making plans for the autumn cattle drive, banking the proceeds from last year’s drive, and taking care of other headquarters matters, are the Zionists.

“Some cowboys prefer the life out on the open range, and others would rather spend their time in the ranch house, but the two groups of cowboys cooperate in the business of running the ranch. If all the cowboys were to leave the herd and hang around the ranch house all the time, the whole ranching enterprise would quickly go down the drain. Likewise, if there were no one back at the ranch house to hold down the fort.

“Thus, both the Diaspora and Zion are essential elements in the Zionist scheme of things.”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (check box).

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.