Investors in Carl Freer Scams May Have a Legal Claim Against the Banks, Lawyers, Accountants and Others Who Endorsed Him by Failing in their Professional Duties of Doing Due Diligence

Investors – would you have invested into Carl Freer companies if you had known of his documented dishonesty and criminality? Did you, in any way, base your decision to become an investor on the fact that others – whom you trusted due to their professional standing – endorsed him?

Lawyers, Accountants, Financiers and Bankers all had both the ability, and the professional duty to undertake due diligence on Carl Freer.

The way these professionals act towards him has a profound affect on others – people who expect that as professionals they know their client. If they support him, even silently, they endorse him – they send a message to others that he is a good man – good risk – good investment.

Conversely, if they distance themselves from someone, investors know to stay away.

Read the PLO articles – they detail to some degree what extent he will go to forge documents and create fake ‘due diligence’ information.

These professionals could now face legal consequences for their silent support of Carl Freer

Let’s have a quick look at what simple, cursory, fleeting, basic due diligence would reveal.

Two convictions for fraud – one in Sweden, one in Germany – had an international arrest warrant issued against him – been arrested five times in five different countries – open arrest warrant in France – associated with the Swedish Mafia – repeatedly described as a hardened criminal – his company received millions of dollars from the IT Factory fraud – used aliases to hide his identity from authorities, business partners and investors – dozens of legal claims against him in several countries – all of which he has since fled – owned Alien King Inc pornography – is being actively investigated by law enforcement – has active law suits against him . . .

If shareholders had known any of the above, would they have become investors? There is more . . .

Fake claims of ownership of patents – lying about trusteeship in Kings Medical Trust – unpaid judgements in America totalling millions of dollars – 6 million bankruptcy papers waiting to be served by UK liquidators – purchasing a $10 million boat with shares in his own company – lying to the Palestinian Investment Fund – close to $20 million share purchase – lying to the Singapore Authorities to get a work permit . . .

This could go on and on. There is more on this site – let alone all the other sources of information available. And here we are just talking about Carl Freer – if you add in his business partners and connections it becomes even more disturbing.

Singapore – one of the great places in the world – infiltrated by Carl Freer

In many cities and countries around the world one can feel very un-welcome. One is viewed as an outsider and treated with suspicion and coldness. Not Singapore – the people are embracive, friendly, and trusting. Their basic position on life is not one of exclusion, distrust, doom and gloom — but rather one of inclusion, optimism and abundance. This is what makes Singapore great – that is why so many flock to Singapore.

Unfortunately, that is also why criminals head there. These cynical degenerates see an opportunity to take advantage of this good-natured people.

It is known they do this. Rather than change their basic nature and become withdrawn and standoffish, procedures are in place to keep criminals out and allow the Singapore culture to thrive.

Although he has been arrested 5 times and convicted twice, he should have been arrested and convicted many more times than that – he talks his way out of trouble as easily as a gazelle runs from danger.

Is it possible that he lied about the intellectual assets and opportunities these companies had in order to attract investment? Is it possible that he lied to get into the country in the first place?

Singaporeans who were duped into investing with him should report these companies to the authorities. They should take legal action against those professional institutions that endorsed this man; or lend their support to any that do.

Carl Freer’s Business Partners, Directors and Senior Management, Lawyers, Accountants, Bankers and others were aware of some, if not all, of his history.

Their combined silence induced investments into the companies. Their continued affiliation with him endorses him.