Just one part of Taylor's prophecy about Trump has yet to fully become a reality. "It says the news media would be captivated by him, and they
would even begin to agree with him," Taylor told Griffith. "That's the only line in the prophecy that hasn't come to pass yet, so we have to ask
ourselves, what's fixing to happen to make the mainstream media to begin to agree with him?" Griffith followed up asking what is "fixing to
happen?"

"God's going to clean out the news media," Taylor said. "God is looking for His people right now, His millionaires and billionaires basically to come
in and start investing in these places and buying them out; taking over. God is going to rebuild them and restore them because there is no spirit of
truth in them right now - and that's what God is going to restore."

The Spirit of God says, "The news media, the news media, you
have become a stench unto my nostrils, there is no spirit of truth in you. I the Lord God will clean out the news media and bring back truth. The sign
will be given when news outlets will go down, bankrupt, and I the Lord God will rebuild them using my righteous people to restore them. I am calling
on my Army, those who are chosen to be journalists, investors, to get ready to take your place as I tear down and rebuild my news media."

Taylor says nearly
everything God told him is coming to pass. However, there is one major exception: His prophecy said, “Even mainstream news media will be captivated
by this man and the abilities that I gift to him and they will even begin to agree with him.” CBN News recently asked Taylor what he thought was
about to happen to make the mainstream media begin to agree with Trump.

a sitting president can get in trouble for breaking law. look up watergate and clinton impeachment. you can't proscute a president for crimes he
committed before he took oath of office until he leaves office.

originally posted by: Gothmog
This brave Senator stood up and shouted "you lie" when Obama was speaking on Obamacare (Pelosicare?). This Senator was severely berated by his
Republican colleagues instead of being hailed as a national hero.
This Senator's name was Joe Wilson

Joe Wilson was just a racist.

All the Presidents lie.

But, when a person sits in that position, the Office of President gets a certain respect.

The President is allowed to lie, without heckling.

Obama was the first president that was heckled. That was just because of racism.

Nobody ever got up and told George Bush "you lie", even though we all know he lied about Saddam's WMD.

Why the double standard? One white, one black.

That's all.

No he's not racist he was saying the truth and Obama is a straight up Marxist but of course all the little Marxist types defend him while
denying it as well. However I do have to say while Obama straight up hatescAmerica and wants justice for every other nation, the other Presidents
since JFK have been Globalists and Internationalists meaning they have no loyalty to our country but to their One World Global Government. It's just
that they used the race card in nobody could call out Obama without being called a racist. Too bad if you don't like that truth.

The best defense they had was "the first time I heard about it was last ____day in the press report". Time after time. We all knew they were
gangsters from Chicago, we all knew he was grown in that eco system to transform US into a crap-hole, we all knew when his lips moved he was lying,
and we didn't go full bore against him because we all were afraid be being called a racist. Most honest people would doubt their intentions, and they
counted on it.

Imposing universal health care on America was a watershed event. Perhaps it warranted a single heckle. Maybe even a few fake coughs .... spontaneous
laughter? I digress. It was a wee little bit of light at the time that has been proven true.

If there is no valid retort, attack the messenger. Undermine his credibility, and make public accusations to seed doubt. Old school. I believe here
at ATS there is an open minded community where we can explore. Let's do that instead.

If there is no valid retort, attack the messenger. Undermine his credibility, and make public accusations to seed doubt. Old school. I believe here
at ATS there is an open minded community where we can explore.

It's a neat thing to do when there is new evidence that the former POTUS may have been lying about his contact with the FBI concerning an
investigation into the woman who the POTUS and his political party were desperately banking on being the successor to the office...and a back-to-back
presidential first in America.

It's a worthwhile endeavor, and if you choose to take the road of dismissal and trivializing the issue, that's on you, but it certainly reflects
poorly on your willingness to seek out corruption, wherever it may be, or to objectively acknowledge possible evidence of wrongdoing by people,
regardless of what letter follows their name on a ballot.

How did you respond to sexual allegations and recordings of Trump from well over two years ago? Do you apply the same arbitrary statute of limitations
to everyone, or just ones that you deem to be 'orange gods?' Like has been asked of others in this thread, do you really think that, since someone is
not in office anymore, that they're (possible) past wrongdoings are irrelevant?

Take a deep breath, relax, and then jump on the sanity bandwagon with some of the rest of us and let's investigate corruption wherever it may be and
whenever it may have happened. Hell, even if a statute of limitations has expired, it's still worthwhile for Americans to know what their politicians
may have been doing while in office.

"If you like the plan you have, you can keep it. If you like the doctor you have, you can keep your doctor, too. The only change you’ll see are
falling costs as our reforms take hold."

It was the republicans who change the Affordable care act. Obama spoke with HONEST intenions and the republican changed the legislation.
Kind how the democrat are fight the wall. We cannot say trump lied about it because he is being blocked from doing it.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.