The second Apple v. Samsung patent trial has wrapped up, with both sides delivering their closing arguments to a jury gathered in San Jose federal court for the last month.

Apple is seeking $2.2 billion in damages from Samsung, its biggest competitor. Samsung turned the smartphone market into a "two-horse race" by copying, according to Apple lawyers. Apple already won around $930 million from a bruising 2012 jury verdict against Samsung, combined with a 2013 re-trial on some damages issues.

Apple: "Time for you to do justice"

Apple's lead counsel, Harold McElhinny, went first, taking "all of four minutes to invoke the memory of Steve Jobs," notes an Associated Press brief on the closing. McElhinny called the iPhone "revolutionary," just as he had in the opening statement, which was laden with glowing press coverage of the first iPhone launched in 2007.

"Samsung changed phone after phone that was under development to copy feature after feature after feature of the iPhone," McElhinny said, according to a PCWorld report. "Now it’s time for you to do justice."

Other reports show how McElhinny pushed the fact that Apple had multiple software engineers testify while no Samsung executives showed up from Korea. "None of them were brave enough to come here and face cross examination," McElhinny said, per Reuters.

Google has supported Samsung through this litigation, providing witnesses and covering some costs. The case centers around the Android software loaded on to Samsung phones. But McElhinny made sure the jury was clear that this case was against Samsung, not Google.

“Google is not a defendant in this case,” McElhinny said, according to re/code. “The issue in this case is Samsung’s conduct... Google should not be an issue for you."

Apple is asserting Samsung sold 37 million phones that infringe five Apple patents, which cover features including swipe-to-unlock, an auto-correction method for spelling, background syncing, "data recognition" of phone numbers and dates, and universal search. It has accused Samsung's Galaxy III, Note II, Stratosphere, and Galaxy Nexus phones, among others, of infringing.

Samsung: "You know Apple doesn't own everything"

"There's no copying in this case," Samsung lawyer John Quinn told the jury. "They have to make you think that so you get enraged." That's what they need to do, to justify a $2.2 billion damages claim, he said.

Quinn's closing was fast-paced, to the point of leaving him breathless at points. He emphasized that the jury should take a close second look at the five patents Apple has asserted in this lawsuit and not just sign off on the decisions of the US Patent Office. "At the patent office it was just Apple," he reminded the jury.

Finally, he took a shot at Apple's damages case: asking for up to $40 per phone. "They'll be dancing in the streets of Cupertino if you give them $100 million," said Quinn, according to a live blog from the San Jose Mercury-News.

"This suit was a longshot," Quinn added. "It's in their backyard. They certainly weren't going to take on the local company, Google in Mountain View, and they didn't."

Apple's real goal was to shut down the competition, he said. Quinn pointed to a 2010 e-mail from Steve Jobs, first made public during this trial's opening statements, in which Jobs laid out a long list of items on the company's agenda for 2011. "Holy war with Google" was high up on the list.

Samsung has two patents of its own that it says are infringed by Apple. Its damage demand for those patents is $6 million. Apple lawyer Bill Lee did a short rebuttal of that case, saying that the whole point of Samsung's counterclaim was "to convince folks like you that patents aren't worth much."