President Obama long promised a "green grid", now he's finally prepared to unveil a plan for one.

Upgrades to the aging grid, particularly internet-connected load-balancing technologies could greatly reduce power transmission losses and power costs. (Source: SDrelo)

Some fear that an internet-connected grid could allow for domestic surveillance or allow foreign nations to sabotage the U.S. power system. (Source: AP Photo)

A "major" technology provider will reportedly be involved

The United States and other nations are preoccupied with how to deploy "greener" energy. Many argue they should instead be looking at how to cut the approximately 6.5 percent of generated power that is wasted each year in transmission losses.

When U.S. President Barack Obama took office he promised to address this issue. Now three years later, under the leadership of Steven Chu, Ph.d, Secretary of the Department of Energy; Aneesh Chopra, U.S. Chief Technology Officer; and other officials, he finally appears ready to make good on that promise.

Later today President Obama's staff will deliver a presentation entitled "Building the 21st Century Electric Grid". The event will be targeted at bringing together the private sector and government resources to help renovate the badly aging grid.

In a press release the government states:

The Administration will announce a number of new public- and private-sector initiatives designed to accelerate the modernization of the nation’s electric infrastructure, bolster electric-grid innovation, and advance a clean energy economy, in part by taking greater advantage of digital and communications or ’smart grid’ technologies....Along with the announcement of new public and private initiatives aimed at building a smarter, expanded grid and empowering consumers, the Cabinet-level National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) will release a new report: ‘A Policy Framework for the 21st Century Grid.’ This policy framework charts a collaborative path forward for applying digital information or ’smart grid’ technologies to the nation’s electricity infrastructure to facilitate the integration of renewable sources of power into the grid; help accommodate the growing number of electric vehicles; help avoid blackouts and restore power quicker when outages occur; and reduce the need for new power plants.

II. Google Gets Involved?

SmartGridNews.com's chief analyst, Jesse Berst, reports that the administration will partner with "at least one technology vendor." If this is true it should be intriguing to see who that partner is.

International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) is one familiar face in the smart grid movement, having long plugged greening the grid. Newer players include Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) "Hohm" service and Google Inc.'s (GOOG) "PowerMeter" service.

If one had to guess, Google seems the most likely partner for the job. The white house press release hints at internet connectedness for the grid, and Google is the king of all things internet. Further, President Obama has a close relationship with Google and its executive management.

A few leading utilities will also be brought on board. We'd expected "green-minded" west coast players like Pacific Gas & Electric, Comp. (PCG) to get onboard here.

Mr. Berst claims, "Our sources say the announcements will include a new nonprofit to encourage rapid implementation of consumer tools for choice and control."

III. Privacy, Security Issues Loom

An important elephant in the closet few are discussing is that a connected grid could lead to some privacy and security issues.

Many sources have pointed out that an internet-connected smart grid would be a far easier target for sabotage by foreign agents than a traditional "dumb grid". If critical systems were broken into, there's a very real potential for loss of power -- and loss of life.

Further, with your power usage on the internet, it's possible for remote snooping by either the government or malicious individuals. This is arguably a lesser risk, in that it would require a great deal of effort and ultimately offer relatively little reward (power usage statistics aren't exactly the most sensitive piece of private information).

That said, some critics feel connecting the grid to the internet will compromise their privacy. Some argue that it's the government sticking its nose in one more place that it doesn't belong.

The presentation thus far has had few surprises, and fewer still details. Full of anecdotal tales and historical references, but short on actual concrete plans for smart grid implementation, the presentation felt more like "Grid 101" than a clear blueprint for progress.

The White House press release [PDF] does offer a few details on what the new plan entails, at least. It writes that the U.S. government will:

Offer $250M USD in guaranteed government loans to utilities and IT partners to deploy smart grid technologies -- this is in addition to the $4.5B USD from the Recovery Act that was pledged to the smart grid.

Create a new executive branch entity called the "Renewable Energy Rapid Response Team" whose purpose is to clear the red tape, expediting the permitting process for new alternative energy installations and new grid upgrades.

Create a private sector initiative called Grid 21 to connect the public with smart grid players to get clear and informative data.

Hold local "peer-to-peer" meetings to involve local governments in the "smart grid" buildup.

This all sounds fine and good, but the Recovery Act "smart grid" investment didn't exactly transform the nation's decrepit grid in any substantial way, so it's unclear how 1/18th of that investment amount in guaranteed loans will make much difference.

Secretary Chu at least acknowledged the security concerns to some extent, stating, "I think all the utilities are very aware that you need the security so someone can't just hack in and see a customer's usage data."

Supporters of the "smart grid" movement will find it nice to see a verbal commitment and a bit of enthusiasm, but ultimately the policy appears mostly political posturing. Real change will have to come from the private sector; unfortunately many utilities seem relatively unwilling to make major changes. It appears that the best hope for a true smart grid will lie with tech innovators like Google, Microsoft, and IBM, who can pressure utilities to adopt new technologies in some areas.

Stay tuned for more details.

Comments

Threshold

Username

Password

remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

You're the one sounding moronic right now. Why are you resorting to name calling in an otherwise civilized conversation? What is wrong with population control?

Population will be controlled one way or another, whether through planning (prevention) or through nature (disease/famine). I personally would rather have population controlled through planning and not have people suffering.

Personally, I think you're offended because you have very poor comprehension that you think that population control has to mean killing people off (as you mistakenly claimed in your earlier post). Your idiocy saddens me.

You participate in the discussion like an emotional 16 year old kid. You have a lot to learn about getting along with people.

Even when I see you reply to other people in other topics, you're nasty and abrasive. Your style makes you accumulate enemies and it's no surprise that you find yourself without allies in an argument. Even when I agree with the point you're trying to make, when I see you behaving this way I go out of my way to mod you down.

quote: Agreed, and we really don't need to do anything for this problem to fix itself. Just step back and let the fuckers annihilate themselves. It's always the bottom of the barrel that seems to be reproducing the most - an uncanny likeness to other pests like insects and rats.

THIS sounds like something like an "emotional 16 year old kid" would say. But because he's agreeing with you, you have no problem with "fuckers annihilating themselves" and his clearly bigoted views, that YOUR suggestions are supporting.

It's kinda hard to not get "emotional" when someone like you comes in with some "logical" suggestion that's off base, and goes against everything we believe in. Jason Mick and others haven't been "nasty and abrasive", yet you still don't seem to get it. Sometimes a punch in the face works better than a pat on the ass.

quote: Even when I agree with the point you're trying to make, when I see you behaving this way I go out of my way to mod you down.

quote: THIS sounds like something like an "emotional 16 year old kid" would say. But because he's agreeing with you, you have no problem with "fuckers annihilating themselves" and his clearly bigoted views, that YOUR suggestions are supporting.

Someone else said that, not me. I can't be held responsible for the comments of people I don't even know and have never talked to.

quote: It's kinda hard to not get "emotional" when someone like you comes in with some "logical" suggestion that's off base, and goes against everything we believe in.

quote: Someone else said that, not me. I can't be held responsible for the comments of people I don't even know and have never talked to.

You didn't' come down on him, but you're coming down on me. So it's agreement by omission. Don't play silly mind games with me, you completely agree with him. Even now you can't bring yourself to denounce his post.

quote: No, it goes against what you believe in.

It's funny how you think this is a Right vs. Left issue. If you took a poll, the HUGE majority of this country would be against your population control proposals. You're an idiot if you think I'm in some minority here.