Technology and other innovations -- such as cloud computing and telework -- have dramatically changed the way federal employees perform their jobs. But when it comes to finding new and innovative ways of doing business in government, most federal employees lack the appropriate incentives and support, according to survey results released last week.

The Office of Personnel Management’s 2012 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey of more than 687,000 federal employees found that just 38.5 percent of respondents believe that creativity and innovation are rewarded at their agency. That’s down slightly from roughly 41 percent in the past three surveys conducted since 2008, OPM found.

In addition, 91 percent of federal employees said they are constantly looking for ways to do their jobs better, yet only 57.8 percent said they feel encouraged to come up with new and better ways of doing things, down from 59.4 percent last year. Those figures are in stark contrast to the private sector, where 71 percent of workers say they feel encouraged to come up with new and better ways of doing things, the FEVS found.

To be fair, the slight decline in the number of feds feeling creativity and innovation are rewarded may be in large part because of budget cuts and pay freezes over the past couple of years. At the same time, however, agencies should look to spur innovation among employees in hopes of finding better -- and often cheaper -- ways of doing business.

In fact, I wrote an article in the November issue of Government Executive that highlights OPM’s efforts to encourage innovation among employees and across government through the construction of an innovation lab in its basement, where employees can meet to solve problems using a human-centered design approach. OPM learned several lessons from top Silicon Valley companies like Facebook and IDEO in designing its innovation space.

What are your thoughts on the government’s low innovation score? What is needed to spark a more innovative spirit at your agency, and would an innovation lab similar to OPM’s do the trick?

recommended for you

Brittany Ballenstedt writes Nextgov's Wired Workplace blog, which delves into the issues facing employees who work in the federal information technology sector. Before joining Nextgov, Brittany covered federal pay and benefits issues as a staff correspondent for Government Executive and served as an associate editor for National Journal's Technology Daily. She holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from Mansfield University and originally hails from Pennsylvania. She currently lives near Travis Air Force Base, Calif., where her husband is stationed.

FROM OUR SPONSORS

sponsored

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although Nextgov does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has
no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to
be in violation of this rule.

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.