This is a common refrain. It’s been echoed by various people who choose to believe in the thiomersal/MMR/autism connection. Lets look again at what Jim Laidler said:

The chief problem with the VAERS data is that reports can be entered by anyone and are not routinely verified. To demonstrate this, a few years ago I entered a report that an influenza vaccine had turned me into The Hulk. The report was accepted and entered into the database.

This is what people routinely claim is ‘bullshit’. So, I thought I’d put it to the test.

VAERS has two ways of submitting a report. Firstly, you could download a PDF, fill it in and post it off. Or, you could do what I elected to do and fill in and submit a report online.

VAERS has a helpful popup which tells you exactly what it needs to know – which are the most important pieces of data it needs. However, the fact that I live in the UK was not deemed of importance. Neither was the fact that I told VAERS that my daughter had been turned into Wonder Woman. The only piece of contact data I submitted was my email address and I wasn’t even asked for that. I submitted it voluntarily.

I’m going to get a bit nerdy now.

VAERS use very, very simple Javascript form validation. It tripped me up a couple of times as I got confused about the fact you crazy Americans use mm/dd/yyyy rather than dd/mm/yyyy and it didn’t like the 24 hour clock either.

The Javascript routine caught the fact that I tried to submit an adverse event *before* the fictional date of my daughters birth but it failed to catch that I stated the vaccine was administered at 18months and that the date for vaccination I provided was only 6 months after the ‘birth’ date.

But you don’t have to take my word for it, I ventured into Bartholomew Cubbins territory and recorded an AVI movie of me performing the whole process.

There’s a highly compressed and slightly lacking in quality version in SWF (Flash) format here (12mb) and a Hi-res version here (150mb). Please note that I use a ridiculously high resolution (1600 x 1200) so the SWF might encroach off the edge of your screens. If you’d rather download that file, right click it instead of left clicking it.

So what have I illustrated?

That Jim Laidler, far from ‘bullshitting’ about the record entry process and subsequent unreliablity of data was telling the truth. Anyone can enter any data into VAERS. Even someone from another country. Good source data? I think not.

Like this:

Related

10 Responses to “On Using VAERS”

Sure, but I think it’s important to explain why the trends occur. Why do the number of reports go up and then down? Simple; as the thimerosal theory becomes more popular, more parents report cases of autism that they have been made to believe is caused by vaccines. The movement take on critical mass, thimerosal is removed, and now less parents report to the system simply because they can’t claim thimerosal harmed their children anymore. Meanwhile, the autistic population in CDDS continues to grow at an annual rate of 10% and has a long way to go before it stabilizes.

Sometimes the results are not quite what they expecting. I believe that this analysis of VAERS reports after the HepB vaccine is more of a cautionary tale about co-sleeping with babies (which I did, though I preferred to have the bassinet nearby):http://sids-network.org/experts/poa9078.pdf

Hi
Well, the situation, such as I see if you allow me an opinon, is that there is no trustable source data-VDS, VAERS-of the real adverse effects of vaccines, by different reasons. It has been demonstrated the problems of using CCDS to analyze changes in prevalence of autism.
Therefore we can not say a conclusive word about, it seems anything.
Please let me then go back.
Who are the group that would be aware of potential health problems in susceptible individuals and to hear parents concerns? Doctors (Peditricians, neurologists,etc ). Only 1 to 10 % of adverse effect of vaccines are reported -considering some informal statistics-and this is worrisome. Do you know about a published report about in some Medical Journal such as Lancet or BMJ?
Because the questions seemed to be reduced to vaccines as a cause or not of autism in a controversy, the real potential problems of vaccines are not even considered. With the tremendous importance of vaccines, why a different approach cannot be considered, at an individual level?
If doctors would be trained to be aware of problems in susceptible individuals, to respect parents concerns and to hear them and to consider the possibility seriously, we would have a better reporting data base about.
Please let me know if you want me to post some recent published papers about the importance of pharmacovigilance in vaccines, mainly in susceptible individuals.I want to clarify that I think that vaccines are extremely important. The point of safety for all, including susceptible individuals, is what worries me.
Thank you in advance for understanding.
What do you think?
MarÃ­a LujÃ¡n

Once upon a time, Dr. Laidler gave more details on what he entered into the VAERS database. It’s very funny.

It was like, “I turned green and developed massive muscles and had an incredible urge to turn cars over…” or something.

Can you imagine the VAERS folks when they called him, “uh, sir, we have here that following a flu vaccine injection you turned “Kelly green” and suddenly grew very large and angry, it’s says you lose shirts on a daily basis?? Is this correct?”

So your little girl can use a special lariat thing?

I can see why they would allow people in the UK or elsewhere to report reactions, you might be an American working there in Britain, just moved their recently. Still it seems like they could do a little more checking on the accuracy of the claims.

I would suggest the VSD (since it’s actual medical records) is substantially more reliable than CDDS or VAERS data. It’s not perfect and has its limitations, but you’d think that you could get a fair idea of whether there were associations between autism and other events by using it.

Of course, the only people that can do a proper VSD study are the living-room lab excel-using monotone-speaking chemical-castration injecting Geiers. Not trained epidemiologists with decades of experience.

Recent Articles

There is a charity called “Children with Autism Deserve Education“. C.A.D.E or CADE for short. I ran across them a few years ago and saw some expenses in their tax forms that I felt were, let’s say, interesting. So they stuck in my mind and I decided recently to check into them again. The name […]

Rate this:

The Autism CARES Act (Autism Collaboration, Accountability, Research, Education, and Support Act of 2019) has been introduced in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The existing Autism CARES Act will expire this year, so a new bill is needed to continue the work. Autism CARES is good for the autism communities. Autism CARES continues […]

Rate this:

A few years back the Age of Autism converted from a business to a nonprofit. That means we get some information on their financial status. As a nonprofit, their tax forms become public. Nonprofits file IRS form 990’s and those are hosted by various providers online. The most recent informaiton we can get is for […]

Rate this:

When Donald Trump was running for president (has he ever stopped running for president and started governing?) the anti-vaccine community threw full support behind him. They were excited because here was a candidate who publicly accepted and promoted the fake and damaging idea that vaccines cause autism. Before running, Trump supported the idea that vaccines […]

Rate this:

The essay is structured as “you were pregnant. You had hopes and dreams. Then you got a shock–your kid wasn’t what you hoped for.” Why do we keep telling parents that story? The only reason there is a shock is because we don’t remind parents that disability is real. And that the dream lives on–having […]