Is the issue of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
really about POLYGAMY?

Upon close investigation, we discover that almost all pro-POLYGAMY minded individuals vehemently oppose the idea of a father seduction of a daughter,
in any case in which the girl is the father's own biological daughter.

Furthermore, even in any case in which the girl is a "only" a step-daughter instead, we also discover, upon close investigation, that many pro-POLYGAMY minded individuals
also immediately realize and oppose the horrendous abuse of such a power-dynamic of a step-father's abuse in a seduction of a step-daughter.

As such, a close investigation reveals that a vast number of such pro-POLYGAMY ones do not support the idea of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
at all. In fact, a multitude of pro-POLYGAMY minded individuals are very much "against" it indeed, immediately recognizing such a horrendous exploitation and abuse of a power-dynamic between a girl and her father or step-father indeed. Thus, such pro-POLYGAMY ones do indeed oppose such a profound abuse of any father exploiting that power-dynamic in such an abusive way with a step-daughter as well as with any biological daughter.

On the other hand, there are some other people, who only support MONOGAMY (actually being anti-POLYGAMY minded), who actually would think that the idea of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
is acceptable ---or, at least, with step-daughters, anyway. As well, some other MONOGAMY-only minded individuals could likely be found who would say that, as long as the mother is no longer "legally married" to the father, they would think that, if the father wanted to seduce and "marry" even his own biological daughter, they would find that acceptable. For such MONOGAMY-minded ones as these, the issue of the power-dynamic means nothing. (One can immediately envision this
as being an episode for discussion on "trash TV" so-called "talk shows", such as "Jerry Springer" or "Sally Jesse Raphael", in the United States.)

Of course, though, as this idea of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
is considered quite and downright unacceptable to many in civil society, still though, that does not mean that such ones would then think that MONOGAMY itself should then be banned, just because
they found some horrendous examples of pro-MONOGAMY individuals perpetrating
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter). Rather,
such ones would only be concerned specifically with the idea of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
by itself.

Any person who therefore concludes that they are even downright "against"
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter), then it must also be understood and concluded that that issue is a completely separate issue from that of POLYGAMY. Moreover, all who would oppose that horrendous idea of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
would also actually find much equal support alongside them even from many who
do support POLYGAMY.

As such, this investigation reveals that
the issue of
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
is a completely separate issue from POLYGAMY altogether.

Therefore, THAT then reveals the truth for us that
father seduction of a daughter (or step-daughter)
is
not a basis for bringing us to an ANTI-POLYGAMY way of thinking.