Quick Launch

If there is a shortage of Intensive Care beds or ventilators in a pandemic, then physicians in the hospital should decide who would receive or who should be denied those lifesaving resources.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

We need to have public policies to assure fairness in the allocation of scarce life‐saving resources during a pandemic, not the subjective judgments of individual physicians.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

A non‐partisan committee of experts, both medical and non‐medical, should have primary responsibility for creating public policies for allocating scarce life‐saving resources during a pandemic.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Difficult ethics issues must be addressed and ethical trade‐offs will need to be made as part of formulating any policies regarding allocating lifesaving resources in a pandemic.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

The ethics issues that need to be addressed in these policies should reflect the views of citizens who would potentially be affected by these policies; hence, there should be broad public involvement in determining these policies informed by the views of various experts.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Public engagement in fashioning these allocation policies is necessary to build public trust and to give them political legitimacy.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Our first ethical principle in shaping these allocation policies is that all citizens must be treated as having equal rights; no special access should be given to lifesaving resources for those who are wealthy or politically connected or socially prominent.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Individuals with health insurance who can pay for their care should have priority for lifesaving resources over uninsured individuals who cannot pay for their care.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

We understand that not everyone can be saved whose life might be at risk during an academic. We should give highest priority for lifesaving resources to those who are most ill AND who are also most likely to benefit from having those lifesaving resources.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Patients with the highest probability of dying soon should be denied scarce resources in order to benefit patients with a higher likelihood of survival.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Patients who are extremely ill in a pandemic and who will require very prolonged use of an ICU bed or a respirator should be given lower priority for using these resources than individuals who are likely to recover more quickly, thereby making that resource available to more patients.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Patients with various disabilities, such as being blind or deaf or paralyzed, should have equal rights to lifesaving resources in a pandemic as patients who have no disabilities.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Patients with end‐stage dementia are often regarded as persons with disabilities, but such patients should have only very low priority for scarce lifesaving resources during a pandemic.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very high priority for scarce lifesaving resources should be given to health care professionals caring for patients in a pandemic if they themselves become infected as long as they are likely to recover.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

If family members of health care professionals caring for pandemic patients are at increased risk of infection from the health professional, then they too deserve high priority for access to scarce lifesaving resources as long as they are likely to recover.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

If we have too many patients with good chances of survival and too few ICU beds or respirators, then priority ought to go to relatively younger patients.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

If we have too many patients with good chances of survival and too few ICU beds or respirators, then a lottery should determine who gets the ICU bed or respirator.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

In a severe pandemic I would endorse excluding from a critical care unit any patient who had suffered severe trauma, such as serious brain injury from a car accident, requiring extensive use of lifesaving resources.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

In a severe pandemic I would endorse excluding from a critical care unit any patient who had metastatic cancer with poor prognosis.

Strongly Agree

Agree

Uncertain

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

In a severe pandemic I would endorse excluding from a critical care unit any patient who had suffered end‐stage organ failure, such as a severely damaged heart or liver.