In all cases the government killed civilians with secret police/military, and there was no nation wide revolt, nor was there a large scale mutiny of
military troops. No civil war occurred due to the government ordering civilians killed/disappeared.

And you know why?

Because the guy in the military with a gun to your head...is most likely a normal guy. And when a normal guy is told "shoot him or we shoot you",
hes going to shoot you. Why? Because you are a stranger to him. Hes not going to lose his life to try and save you. And if he does, the next guy in
line will just shoot you anyway. He knows that. So hes going to shoot you and live on.

Your life < their lives. Given a choice, almost everyone will choose to save their own lives over someone elses, especially if its someone they don't
know.

Its especially easy if the government claims you are a terrorist, some religious extremist, part of a child [*SNIP*] cult, whatever...they will accept
the reason, kill you, and pat themselves on the back for a good job done protecting the country.

Protip : Your country is not some special "holy land" where everyone will work together to save each other from a tyrannical government. There will
be simultaneous nation wide revolt, entire battalions will not defect to "the resistance", and in all likelihood at least 95% of gun owners will do
nothing but hand over their guns with some bitching, because there will be a squad of soldiers pointing rifles at them to make sure they comply.

lets say you and your buddies are told to arrest a bunch of guys.

These guys are a bunch of neckbeards with AR-15s and other military equivalents. They are hold up in their homes and have said they will only give up
their weapons in death.

They are shooting at you and your buddies. Do you shoot back and kill them?

Oh and these guys also claim to be "resistance fighters". Do you still shoot them?

Oh and another historical note : My Lai massacre. "But we were just obeying orders". Did any of the soldiers there say "No" to the order?

Your history is a bit off. Hitler did not gain power from a revolution. He was elected and then stripped peoples rights, often in the name of
security. The burning of the reichstag for example was a false flag attack they used to crack down on any opposition. You also forgot to mention two
of the most well known revolutions in history - the French and American revolutions.

On one hand, there is a great amount of unrest and discontent in a nation historically bound to an armed populace and an anti-government culture.

I could easily see a point in which people attempt such an endeavor, but I don't see it working out well by a long shot. The groups which would be
active generally have a knack for attracting some very undesirable elements from our fine American society.

On the other hand, we have spent the past 30 years or so binding ourselves to power through debt. Say the word and they could take your home, your
cars, your ability to drive, and your freedom within the confines of the law.

The American people have also become beholden to the mass media for thought rather than for information.

A revolt in America is laughable at best, and I'd suggest that no one who truly wishes to act against the government ever say so on a phone, the
internet, or any other means.

The methods by which a very small number of people can control, oppress, imprison, and slaughter millions of others against their will have been
developed and implemented throughout the history of the 20th century.

For example, in the Russian Revolution the Bolsheviks were a very tiny minority of those who wanted social, political, and economic reform. Yet they
seized power ruthlessly, and cowed the population by instituting the "Terror", whereby secret police squads (mainly staffed by previous prison
inmates), randomly picked up people off the street and executed them, regardless of their innocence. Of course, this resulted in a civil war which
lasted for 6 years, and claimed millions of Russian lives, but in the end the Bolsheviks prevailed.

So if there is some sort of totalitarian coup that takes place in the US, then there very well may be some limited armed resistance, as there was in
Russia (many of the czarist generals fought against the Bolsheviks), but the idea that the American population (addicted to McDonalds and the
Simpsons), will rise up en mass with the cry of "Liberty or Death" is farcical.

---what do you call what has been going on in this country??--more noticeable since bush came into power --ITS a revolution against the
constitution and the bill of rights---not to mention the environment,against the middle class. Some revolutions are ongoing and never stop

When the trucks stop delivering because the company went bankrupt then the goods, food, and fuel are gonna stop being delivered. Times are bad enough
with the trouble people are having keeping their jobs. If those with income can not buy food because the trucking companies went bankrupt you can bet
people will resort to any means necessary.

Note, most revolutionaries either have total decorum or a total lack of it. why is that? Extremes I guess. When they unite, my friend, anything is
possible.. why do you think the government and FEMA are so concerned about it if it's 'a wet dream' - it's not only a real possibility, it could
easily happen tomorrow with the right catalysing event.

Catalysing event? Well, as it would say in the document called rebuilding america's defenses. that's exactly what the U.S needs.

Trust me, you'd be wrong to say it's a revolutionaries wet dream. But definitely a wet dream of the power base.

Because the guy in the military with a gun to your head...is most likely a normal guy. And when a normal guy is told "shoot him or we shoot you",
hes going to shoot you.

This is true in all the cases above.. the guys with guns killed the guys without the guns.. they didn't dare turn against the other men with guns..
their chances of living were oh so much greater.

In the US a Soldier would then face the consequences of... going with the Army with guns, or the Army with guns.. it would come down to moral choice
and obligation, and many would choose the side of the "people" (which includes millions of Military trained men and women.......)

So long as the US Citizens hold on tight to their guns, no one can harm us.. we are the worlds largest trained, unorganized militia.. the American
citizens hold more guns than the Worlds armies combined.. So the only thing to fear is the Liberals who get the wet dreams thinking about taking your
gun away.

Obviously the vast majority of (either soldiers or people) would prefer to shoot total strangers, than bring that fate on themselves or their
family.

BUT: In this environment, if so much as a U.S, military, Corporal were to start making plans with men to attack Congress, or to start forging
other links with just a few of our government’s many departments, then…
1. Support from his men would be higher.
2. So the chances of his plan getting “blown” by the secret service would be reduced, probably because the secret service itself would be worried
about what exactly, sort of future, the dictatorship is creating for their sons and daughters.
3. Even if he failed, it would be maybe only weeks, before somebody (who may well have learnt from others mistakes) would try to follow the footsteps.

Overall, the reality of being in power would (for those in power) become more like being a member of the Mafia, than an Elite social glass.
This is because although they’re tyranny would Continue to grant them the (virtually) endless wealth some enjoy now, it would (just like the Mafia)
seriously reduce their life expectancies.
Just like a drug dealer not knowing if or when, they’ll get caught; their wealth too could be confiscated at almost any moment. They may meet the
same fate as Saddam, or (as history occasionally shows) a death that’s potentially much worse.

What’s Lacking For A Revolution…
1. Public support: Most Americans-Europeans continue to believe they live in a functioning democracy, one that may not be completely fair, but one
that is good nonetheless.
2. Unity: Most people think our democracy needs improving, but few will support illegal ways of getting power, never mind violence.
3. Treachery: The people (who would at all levels lead the revolution) being employed by government (as fully paid up double, gov agents) or because
they’d probably be an even worse government, than the current one.

The Final Obstacle: Distraction…
I think Government would sooner unite us all e.g. by bringing back the Draft in order to rob a whole generation of a good chunk of its intellectuals,
then sit idle and not go to war with half the non-nuclear world.
This is what happened to society during World War 1 & 2 (because the fallen in wars tend to Brave & Politically passionate, whilst the survivors are
better placed being Cowardly & Disinterested in politics.
Also (at least in) Russia, a lot of political radicals (who could otherwise have caused the Tsar, state, serious trouble) where sent to die in
missions where they would probably not succeed. Even if they did succeed, there are always more missions they can put a “hero” like you on!

Never work? Really? Wow... Then the Philippians are still ruled by Ferdinand Marcos? Cuba by Batista? Russia by the Tsars?

The United States as an independent nation is the direct result of a successful revolution. The changes brought about by the civil rights movement
were a revolution. Equal rights for women? A revolution.

Revolutions are difficult, yes. Dangerous...usually. Necessary at times? Most assuredly they are.

Anyone who believes that the libtards that foster all these "Gun Control' laws are worried about the populace they represent is ignorant of the fact
that these laws are implemented to protect these same self serving plutocrats and to maintain their power. They could care less about making schools
free fire zones or the fact that our latest enemies know full well that malls and schools are their best targets. Revolution of and by the populace
also takes many differing levels and prospects. As mentioned above, race relations, women's rights all came about because of a need to change the
status quo! The documents that our founding is based on have been peeed on by a large segment of our elected officials and academia for 60 years.
Those educated by them are starting to wake up and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that more are PO'ed than content with the way things
are developing. Armed resolution of this conflict is not a wet dream. It is a very viable and probable end result if the will of the people keep being
ignored by the Washington DC congress critters!

One thing to remember and remember well: No revolution has ever ended the way it began, as far as I know. If the "current order" is upended in some
way, violent or otherwise, whatever actually happens and what you expect to happen are more than likely going to be quite different in the long run.

But of course in the long run we're all dead, as J.M. Keynes once said...and life itself is a kind of ongoing revolution that never ends. The
violence and the change may be pushed here or there, near to you personally or far away at another part of the globle...but change and misery seem to
be pretty constant factors in life for most of the people most of the time.

I've talked to and known many military people in my day and most of them were entirely under the belief that there job was the protection of the
American people and the rights/freedoms of the American people. So many of them, if they perceive the rights of the people infringed by the
government, would be likely to join the revolution. People seem to think the government brainwashing of the military works, it doesn't work all the
time. As badly as TPTB want mindless killing machines they aren't getting them and soldiers are waking up.

I think Revolution could come to America but I don't think a violent revolution would work. Only a revolution via information and education can work,
a sort of mass awakening that needs to happen on a Global, not just a national scale. Think about it this way, there are maybe 1200 Billionaires in
the world, most of the Elite who run things are in this category. There are 6 Billion other people... If we awaken there is nothing they can do. Which
is why they try so desperately to keep us afraid, distracted, paranoid and entertained.

I've talked to and known many military people in my day and most of them were entirely under the belief that there job was the protection of the
American people and the rights/freedoms of the American people. So many of them, if they perceive the rights of the people infringed by the
government, would be likely to join the revolution.

The question is, though, whose revolution? Revolution or revolutions? Chaos? Infighting? Too many chefs spoil the soup? Faction A versus Faction B,
with Madame Guillotine to decide the outcome? Raw chaos? Catch as catch can? Lend a neighbor a helping hand? Splintering into several different
nations? Fortified city-states? And so on...

Another thing to keep in mind...in the late 60s/early 70s, lots of people from all walks of life thought there was going to be "a revolution" of
some sort. Heck, it seemed more of a foregone conclusion than anything else...nobody, "straight" or "hippie," thought all those crazy kids would
ever buckle down and buy into "the system..." the idea that a mere 20 years later they would all be aspiriting to BMWs and MBAs would have been seen
as ludicrous by anyone on any part of the political spectrum. The left were convinced "the system" was an evil thing that they'd rather die than
join, and that it was going to collapse under the sheer weight of their exuberance and fervor. The right thought the massive baby boom generation was
simply going to plunge the nation if not the world into dark chaos and the foundations of civilization would crack. Wandering through San Fransisco in
those years, there was chaos everywhere...freaks dancing in the streets, cadres drilling and marching with berets and copies of Mao's Little Red
Book, Hare Krishnas with finger-bells weaving in and out of this mishmash, kids eating out of dumpsters...heck, it looked like the revolution had
already happened. Today there is a Ben and Jerry's at the corner of Haight and Ashbury streets in San Francisco, or so they tell me. (Haven't been
to that fair town in several decades). Then you had all this stuff like the Vietnam war, the oil crisis, the dollar inflating worse than it is
now...really seemed like the end of the world.

I'm not saying for sure that there won't be a revolution of some sort "this time"...just noting that in living memory I think we came closer to
the brink but somehow "the system" was able to absorb those energies and swing with it. Maybe its been too enfeebled now to handle the stress and
really will crack at last...but its far from a foregone conclusion. Most people just want to be left alone to live their lives in relative
predictability and monotony with as little pain as possible. This basic human desire can act as a great buffer of "normlacy" most of the time. But
often, true enough, it can prove all too fragile...

Originally posted by Happyfeet
In all cases the government killed civilians with secret police/military, and there was no nation wide revolt, nor was there a large scale mutiny of
military troops. No civil war occurred due to the government ordering civilians killed/disappeared. And you know why?

Yeah, I know why.

It's because in all of the instances you cited, the government first disarmed the populace, so that no widespread armed revolt
was possible.

That's not the case in the USA.

In the USA, we have this little thread of liberty called The Second Amendment to the Constitution that permits over 80 million
American citizens to legally own some 280 million firearms and an incalculable amount of ammo for those weapons.

I don't care how you try to argue it, 80 million armed individuals are a more potent force than the entire U.S. military
combined. More than that, 80 million armed individuals constitute a more potent force than the entire U.S. militaryandits
international allies combined.

No, there is no way to go in, militarily, and disarm the American people. You're daydreaming if you think it's possible.

All it takes is a single Ruby Ridge Incident to turn millions of Americans against their government. We already know this as a
fact. Ruby Ridge was an enormous public relations blunder for the U.S. government.

Now let's consider another number — if only ONE-TENTH of ONE-PERCENT of American gunowners decided to defy the government,
such that Ruby-Ridge-type incidents became "necessary," then you are talking about 800,000 Ruby Ridge Incidents.

That's if only ONE-TENTH of ONE-PERCENT of American gunowners decided to rebel.

How long, do you think, would it be before all Americans and ALL American gunowners joined the rebellion?

America is far to big and far to diverse for a unified "uprising" like the old days.. any form of violent "revolution" (for lack of a better word)
would essentially be a complete systematic breakdown of central governing power. People in California and Oregon would want something very different
than those in Iowa and Ohio or Georgia, compared to New England, compared to the South, etc etc etc.. America is way to diverse. So you are probably
right in asking "Revolution(s)?"

I think the correct term would be Civil War.

Because of what is said above, the best solution is economic and political warfare.. you don't like what the banks did to our country, move your
accounts, refinance, pay off the credit cards and tell them where they can shove their interest rates, bills and the looting of our treasury. Don't
like the politicians? Vote 3rd party, even if they always loose.. if enough people do it, eventually things will change.

Revolution is far from a wet dream and it would certainly be possible if people in this country as a whole weren't so complacent. Despite
unemployment and economic hardships, most people's lives are business as usual. For many, the changes in this country are subtle and as long as they
can plop down in a recliner after a day at work, flip on the TV and unwind, they won't notice what's going on around them.

Everything is still too normal for most people, plain and simple. They might notice a neighbor or two leaving their area but for the most part we all
live within a bubble of our own existence. If it isn't affecting us directly, we're numb to what is happening to people around the rest of the
country. We might be aware of it but hey, it's not us.

The donkeys and elephants have both done a masterful job of shrugging off the year 2008 and convincing the masses that hey, everything will turn out
fine. As long as people have that mindset, you won't see a revolution. I find it amazing that people in general are so reticent about taxation as a
fact of life that they don't realize that the taxation on the colonists by England that started the American Revolution was a pittance, even
accounting for inflation, compared to how they're taxed today.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.