Malware authors, who are finally taking note of the company’s operating system amid rising market share, have of late victimized Apple, Inc. (AAPL). Amid struggles with malware -- mostly Trojans (programs that imitate real software or are carried by seemingly innocent webpages and trick users into installation) like MacDefender and Flashback -- the company has been scrutinized by security firms who suggest it needs help, and a more proactive stance on plug-in patching.

She has said in past interviews that she is a "total Unix head" (OS X is Unix-like) and dislikes Windows. And she's expressed an interest in hardware security. When she left Recursion Ventures, her security firm, in July she expressed a desire to move away from bug-finding.

Thus she may see her talents first applied to Apple's efforts to lock firmware hackers like George "GeoHot" Hotz out of Apple's iOS firmware. Since the launch of the iPhone, Apple has been largely unable to stop such hackers from defeating its digital rights management scheme (via jailbreaking) and its network locking (via unlocking). Apple has hired hackers in the past (most notably "Comex") to try to shore up its firmware, but the efforts have oft fizzled.

The new recruit, though, could fare better as she brings a long history of eye-opening security exploits. In 2010 at DefCon hacker conference she set up a cell-phone intercepting station, a low-cost homebrew hardware setup that tricked towers into routing calls -- even encrypted ones -- through it, allowing conversations to be snooped on.

But Ms. Paget's most prestigious honor was delaying Windows Vista and in the process greatly improving its security. In 2006 she was hired by Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) to assist with the final development of Vista. According to recent speeches, which she gave after her five-year non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with Microsoft expired in 2011; Microsoft had expected a clean bill of health when they brought her onboard.

Instead, she and her team found a wealth of bugs. She recalls, "We prevented a lot of bugs from shipping on Vista. I’m proud of the number of bugs we found and helped get fixed."

The bug hunt was so successful that it forced Microsoft to delay Windows Vista. Ms. Paget and her team received honorary shirts from Microsoft Vice President of Windows Development Brian Valentine that read: “I delayed Windows Vista.”

Windows Vista is widely viewed as a turning point in Microsoft's security history, paving ground for later

Actually, strictly grammatically speaking, he has a point. As written, the sentence seems to be referring to a past event in its entirety, and thus 'he' would be the correct pronoun.

To get this away from gender and the baggage it carries, consider the A-Team intro:

quote: In 1972 , a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum-security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune.

quote: In 1972, a crack commando unit was sent to prison

clearly refers to their status (a crack commando unit) in 1972. If you instead write it as:

quote: In 1972, soldiers of fortune were sent to prison

it doesn't really make sense. The time reference at the beginning clearly sets up the rest of the sentence as referring to the status quo in 1972, whereas soldiers of fortune is their status in the present.

Now, if it had been written

quote: These soldiers of fortune had been sent to prison in 1972

then it's clear that the first half of the sentence refers to their status in the present, while the second half describes what happened to them in the past. So "She had been hired by Microsoft in 2006" would be using the correct pronoun.

This seems to be where people who are PC go off the rails. While I may not agree with everything said in these comments about the person in the article, I do think that they have the right to say it, while some who preach tolerance are only tolerant of people who agree with them.