Newspapers are struggling to create a successful profit model on the Internet. Corbis

July 30, 2010

ADVERTISEMENT

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

10 things you need to know today

Today's best articles

The week's best photojournalism

Today's top cartoons

Daily business briefing

Facing the most difficult business environment in living memory, the news media is struggling to find ways to turn a profit with online content. One of the most straightforward solutions is to put articles behind a "paywall" — but that strategy has a decidely mixed track record. For every notable success like the Wall Street Journal's website (with more than 1 million online subscribers), there have been high-profile failures. British newspaper The Times — owned, like WSJ.com, by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation — is just the latest example, after its recently erected paywall reportedly led to a sizable fall-off in online readership. Here's a timeline of how paywalls have fared in the past 14 years:

July 1998The New York Timeslifts a $35 monthly fee for overseas readers to boost online advertising revenue.

October 1998Salon, another online magazine, opens a membership area where, for $25 a year, readers gain access to exclusive material as well as a host of benefits.

February 1999Citing "sluggish" growth in online subscriptions, Slatedrops its paywall and allows the public access to its entire site. About 20,000 people had agreed to pay, while the site's free "front porch" was seeing on the order of 400,000 monthly visitors.

March 2001Salonlaunches "Salon Premium," a dedicated stream of exclusive news and comment — with no ads — for which readers must pay a $30 annual fee.

November 2002Although 45,000 paying subscribers have signed up for its premium service, Salon introduces a system whereby non-paying readers can access articles after sitting through a commercial.

August 2003The Los Angeles Times begins charging $4.95 a month for access to its online entertainment section.

May 2005The L.A. Times paywall is dismantled "with little fanfare," after a reported 97 percent drop in readership of affected content.

September 2005The New York Times introduces TimesSelect, placing its entire archive and articles written by its roster of columnists behind a $50-annual-fee paywall. Has anyone noticed that all those restricted columns can also be found on the web "for free?," asked Gothamist's Jen Chung.

October 2007The Financial Times, which began charging for content in 2001, is the first to adopt a "metered model" paywall. Readers get 10 articles for free before being asked to register, then are awarded with a further 30. After that, they are asked to pay an annual subscription of up to $325.

September 2007After much internal wrangling, The New York Timesdrops TimesSelect, and opens its archives to all readers. Rumors spread that the Gray Lady's award-winning roster of columnists was irritated that no one could read their articles online. The newspaper says TimesSelect was a success, with 227,000 subscribers generating $10 million a year in revenue, but that it could make more money by relying on online advertisers.

October 2009Long Island-based newspaper Newsdayintroduces a paywall for its revamped website. Subscribers are asked to pay $5 a week, or $260 a year.

January 2010The New York Timesannounces it will begin charging for online content from January 2011, using a "metered model" similar to that of the Financial Times. The newspaper does not detail what it will charge for access. Meanwhile, it emerges that Newsday has attracted a total of 35 online subscribers in the three months since it erected its paywall.