Wednesday, May 26, 2010

After failing to isolate Iran, Israel wants to kill puppet Obama as their agenda is totaly ruined in the Middle East

Caught In The Act! Is The Murder Of President Obama Being Planned?

Call for Elections to be Halted, Government Seized

Publication Demands “Interim Military Dictatorship” for America

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

(UNEDITED TEXT BELOW)

Newsmax published it but pulled it quickly but not until it was sent to every senior member of Americas military. I got it from a former military intelligence officer. It has done the circuit there. The call I received, from a retired senior intelligence officer and former Defense Attache to Israel went like this, “Gordie, What do you think of this thing? There is only one way to read it, they are calling for the assassination of the president.”

The title of the Newsmax column:

“OBAMA RISKS A DOMESTIC MILITARY INTERVENTION”

The piece itself isn’t reporting anything, its purpose is simple, it is advocating a military coup and the end of the United States of America as a free and democratic republic, using “weasel words” at times, and at times being as direct as a brick in the face. Newsmax makes a case, addressing the officer corps of the United States military, as to why our government has to be removed. Newsmax begins to make his case:

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

TIMING, WHY NEWSMAX AND WHY NOW?

For the first time in years, senior members of Americas military led by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen and head of the army’s Central Command, General Petraeus, have stepped up to derail an Israeli plan to push phony intelligence on the US as they did with Iraq in order to support an invasion of Iran, an attack seen by top American military leaders as both unwarranted and a potential disaster. Israel’s answer was to go to congress and retired officers, bags of cash in hand, to garner support, newspaper ads and finally this act of desparation, an attempt to find conspirators inside the US military willing to commit treason.

Faced with the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq and Secretary Gates proposed downsizing of the military, the clock is ticking on Israel’s plan to push America into war against Iran while adequate forces for an attack, although logistically prohibitive, politically destabilizing and politically suicidal for America.

Additionally, current regulatory legislation before congress, promoted by President Obama, is designed to break the back of Israel’s control of American banking and their stranglehold on the American economy. Of the largest threats to America’s economic survival, “dual citizens,” those with both Israeli and American passports head companies most threatened by new regulations meant to prevent future “pump and dump” attacks on the US economy. If Obama is left alive, the ability to run games like the sub-prime mortgage fraud will end, and with it, billions stolen from middle class Americans.

Israel has no extradition.

WHAT NEWSMAX ACTUALLY SAID

A piece, carefully avoiding treason in some areas and not so well in others, this was written to inflame and induce members of the American military to “act” against our government, something impossible, as we were advised by intelligence experts, unless begun with a presidential assassination. This is how they begin, making their case:

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

Following this introduction, Newsmax makes its case, line by line, for why it is vital that military leaders attack their own country:

# Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.” (Note: An attempt to establish a basis for abandoning rule by civil government by voiding real Constitutional protections.)

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized. (Here, Newsmax panders to right wing elitists in the military, many of whom accept gratuities from Israel.)

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as American by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office. (Newsmax uses “birther/turfer” conspiracy theory as a rationale for treason.)

# They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.(Newsmax is oblivious to the fact that the Bush administration they supported was responsible for every issue and that financial deregulation, tax cuts for the rich and disasterous wars are the root of the economic collapse, that and massive Bush era corruption and spending)

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.(The “intelligence community” Newsmax is talking about is the Mossad, where they get their marching orders. No such issue with the American intelligence community exists.)

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.(Statement is utterly absurd, unsound and can be construed as nothing but “big lie” propaganda meant to frighten Americans into allowing military dictatorship under Israeli control.)

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.(Another absurd “scare tactic” misstatement using “big lie” rationale.)

# They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.(Newsmax is offering a thinly veiled promise of reward to those who betray America. Military dictatorship would put power and wealth in the hands of any involved in a treasonous coup, the use of the term “honor” tied to an act of treason is particularly humorous.)

IS THIS A CALL TO ARMS AGAINST AMERICA?

Making the case for the end of America’s government and freedoms isn’t anything new. America was threatened with a military coup in 1934 using almost idential language. Wall Street bankers and members of the American Legion banded together in what is now called the “Business Plot” in an attempt to install a fascist dictatorship in America based on the Nazi German model, then seen as a basis for saving America from control by a “Jewish conspiracy.”

The first attempt to scare America also sets the stage for a nuclear attack on the US, an attack meant to be blamed on Pakistan. Pakistan has one of the worlds largest and best trained military forces but is plagued by terrorists supported by, would you have guessed it, Israel. Israel continually warns of Paksitan’s nuclear weapons being stolen and Israel is the country that has been training and supplying the terrorist that Israel says constitutes the threat.

“Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?”

SIGNATURE OF ISRAELI PRESIDENT SHIMON PERES ON ILLEGAL WEAPONS AGREEMENT

America is very aware of the high security protecting Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. However, no American has ever been able to find out how secure Israeli nukes are or the nuclear weapons Israel supplied to South Africa in 1975. This article from The Guardian tells of the Israeli deceptions:

Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state’s possession of nuclear weapons.

The “top secret” minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa’s defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel’s defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them “in three sizes”. The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that “the very existence of this agreement” was to remain secret.

The documents, uncovered by an American academic, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, in research for a book on the close relationship between the two countries, provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons despite its policy of “ambiguity” in neither confirming nor denying their existence.

The Israeli authorities tried to stop South Africa’s post-apartheid government declassifying the documents at Polakow-Suransky’s request and the revelations will be an embarrassment, particularly as this week’s nuclear non-proliferation talks in New York focus on the Middle East.

They will also undermine Israel’s attempts to suggest that, if it has nuclear weapons, it is a “responsible” power that would not misuse them, whereas countries such as Iran cannot be trusted.

“BIG LIE” SCARE CLEARLY “OVER THE TOP” AT NEWSMAX

Using tactics more closely aligned with used car sales and peddling vacuum cleaners door to door, Newsmax clearly goes over the top in selling the idea of overthrowing America’s government. Putting an attractive bow on packaged treason without looking blatantly foolish is difficult for the compentent and sane and is clearly impossible for “others.”

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World? (Note: No US intelligence agency has ever reported a nuclear bomb plant in Iran. However, Israel’s Mossad makes this claim regularly.)

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse? (Newsmax ducks direct treason by the “clever” use of statements as questions.)

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims? (More attempts to avoid direct treason by advocating direct overthrow of all civilian government, a call to use the military to stop free elections, carefully worded as a question.)

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility? (Newsmax states that the president is controlled by a secret group. Could Obama be a Freemason or is it the Illuminati again?)

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making. (THE LINE IS CROSSED. DO ANY QUESTION THAT THIS IS A DIRECT CALL TO OVERTHROW AMERICA?)

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. (CALL FOR COUP DEFENDED USING “WEASEL WORD” CALL FOR TREASON)

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.” (CLEAR AND SIMPLE LANGUAGE HERE, VIOLENT REVOLUTION IS BEING ADVOCATED)

JEFF GATES: STAGE FOR OBAMA ASSASSINATION SET MONTHS AGO

Author Jeff Gates describes how the assassination of President Obama may well be part of a broader plan already set in motion:

Yet how could an assassin reach the most closely guarded president of modern times? The plausibility of a security breach has already been pre-staged. At the first state dinner by Obama, two aspiring contestants for a reality television show foiled White House security to come within handshake distance of the president.

Bodyguards were protecting Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin when in November 1995 a Likud Party member shot him at close range. Assassin Yigal Amir invoked a concept from ultra-orthodox Judaism to justify his murder of Rabin as a threat to Jews living in the settlements. Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu led a series of rallies that Rabin described as provoking violence. Netanyahu was elected Prime Minister in June 1996 and immediately sought to inhibit implementation of the Oslo land-for-peace process agreed to by Rabin.

Should pro-Israeli extremists detect an inclination by Barack Obama to endorse a return of Palestinian land to the Palestinians, the likelihood of his assassination will greatly increase. For his death to appear plausibly due to an Islamic source requires pre-staging akin to what is now ongoing. To displace facts with what the public can be induced to believe requires a period of mental preparation in order to make misdirection believable.

A DIRECT CHALLENGE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES: WHEN IS TREASON TREASON?

There is little question but that this would never have been written if powerful forces weren’t aligned behind it. There is little question that this would never have been written unless it were assumed that President Obama was, in fact, already controlled by advisers that would allow him to be overthrown and even murdered in a violent coup, either out of weakness or complicity.

President Obama’s history of avoiding criminal prosecutions for torture, war crimes, spying, treason, massive corruption and other charges as part of a policy of “forgive and forget” and “moving forward” has clearly empowered the kind of desparate acts we see here.

If this article was received from any source other than through military channels, it would be different. This is in the hands of every senior officer, ever intelligence operative, every person capable of “executive action” against America. The idea is obvious, provide the motive, perhaps even the means to those with the opportunity for treason and murder. As the retired US Army Special Forces Colonel (ret) who sent me this said, “There is no way for this to work without killing the president first. They had to know that.”

(Article “pulled” from Newsmax site)Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.