Search This Blog

A Good Outcome for Activism

May 9, 2013 – How terribly satisfying to know that yet another
coal export terminal planned for the Pacific Northwest will not be
developed.Houston-based Kinder Morgan
announced it is dropping its plans for a coal export terminal, to be situated
near the town of Clatskanie (don’t you love the town names in Oregon and
Washington?).Kinder Morgan, a terminal
and pipeline operator, investigated options near Clatskanie for 16 months, but
never applied for any permits.The
intent was to ship coal to Asia from the Columbia River port.The project’s failure to actualize means a
reprieve from coal train traffic for Portland.

This is the third coal export project to be abandoned in the
Northwest.Taken together, the three proposed
terminals represented up to $550 million in investment, 305 permanent jobs, and
almost 50 million tons of Montana and Wyoming coal.Three more projects await approval.Of the six original proposals, Clatskanie
would have generated the most coal train traffic through Portland.Environmentalists opposed the trains because
of the coal dust, diesel pollution, and traffic congestion problems associated with
them.As many as 12 mile-long trains
would have passed through North Portland every day, had the Clatskanie project
moved forward.

An additional problem encountered at the Clatskanie site was
natural-gas-fired power plants, owned by Portland General Electric (PGE).Located in Port Westward Industrial Park, PGE
feared that coal dust would foul the operational parts of the plants. (It doesn’t take a particularly lurid
imagination to guess what that same coal dust might do to human lungs)!While Kinder Morgan has not acknowledged the
vehement opposition to Clatskanie that activists brought to bear,
environmentalists believe it played a role in KM’s decision, says Brett
VandenHeuvel, executive director of Columbia Riverkeeper.

VandenHeuvel believes that coal export is simply not a
viable option in the Northwest.Union
leaders, coal companies, and terminal developers disagree.Their stance, that coal will be shipped
through Canada if it cannot pass through the Northwest, is based on concern
about the jobs lost.One might also
suppose it is founded largely on concern about the money not made.Since VandenHeuvel says he doesn’t expect any
more terminals to be proposed, that concern could be quite legitimate.Coal export has become a toxic subject in the
state of Oregon.

There remain three projects under consideration, as they
undergo the arduous approval/permitting process.Two of them are located in Washington, one is
in Oregon.One of the terminals, to be
sited near Bellingham, Washington, would be called Gateway Pacific and would
handle 53 million tons of coal per year.Another terminal that goes by the name of Millenium Bulk Terminals, to
be located in Longview, Washington, would handle almost 49 million tons
annually.Ambre Energy’s Morrow Pacific
Project would be built in Boardman, Oregon, out of which 9 million tons would
be shipped annually.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends - Today - January 18 - is the day to take action against PIPA/SOPA, two bills being introduced in both houses of Congress that will legalize internet censorship. Go
to senate.gov and house.gov and make your opposition known. Thank you!

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action:
Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp.
The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not
publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost-
wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of
the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the
EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately
launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…