A Response to Ronald Slye

by Lisa Laplante

As an eminent scholar on the topic of amnesties, I appreciate Ron Slye’s thoughtful response to my analysis of the Barrios Altos case. His critiques are certainly ones that I anticipated when offering my broad reading of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’s landmark ruling. As a regional body, the Court can only issue judgments that bind member States. Thus, we will need to wait and see how the Barrios Altos jurisprudence influences decisions in other regional and international systems, and whether these bodies also begin to challenge the legality of amnesties. Ultimately, even in the event that an international consensus develops rejecting amnesties (which preclude any type of criminal investigation or prosecution), it is unlikely that every human rights violator in the world will be criminally prosecuted. Indeed, in transitioning countries similar to those mentioned by Slye (Rwanda, Cambodia, Nazi Germany), it will rarely be possible nor feasible to bring all alleged human rights violators to trial. Instead, as Slye suggests, we may witness countries seeking to address mass atrocities relying on mechanisms like prosecutorial discretion, plea bargaining, sentence reduction and pardons to provide a more nuance –and local– approach to accountability. Undoubtedly, these options might result in more leniency for “foot soldiers” and greater focus on civilian and military leaders who hold the greatest responsibility for setting policies of state violence and repression –a trend already underway in international, hybrid and national tribunals. However, these criminal law mechanisms at least do not force societies to confront the all or nothing option of trials v. total forgetting for the sake of political expediency. Instead, a flexible criminal justice process emerges that upholds the primacy of accountability, important for building the rule of law and meeting the justice demands of victims-survivors. On this last point, I believe that Slye and I concur.

3 Responses

Response…
I don’t think you mean your first sentence to be as self-aggrandizing as it came out.

6.11.2009
at 9:18 am EST Stickler

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

[…] Opinio Juris ? Blog Archive ? A Response to Ronald Slye By Lisa Laplante Ultimately, even in the event that an international consensus develops rejecting amnesties (which preclude any type of criminal investigation or prosecution), it is unlikely that every human rights violator in the world will be … Opinio Juris – http://opiniojuris.org/ […]

December 9, 2016Marrakech Express--Going Slow But Still on Track[Daniel Bodansky is Foundation Professor of Law at the Center for Law and Global Affairs’ Faculty Co-Director at the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law; an Affiliate Faculty Member, Center for Law, Science & Innovation; an Affiliate Faculty Mem...

December 2, 2016Contextualizing the Debate on First Strikes
[Charles Kels is a major in the U.S. Air Force. His views do not reflect those of the Air Force or Department of Defense.]
The fascinating and edifying debate between Adil Haque (see here, here, here, and here) and, respectively, Deborah Pearlstei...

November 30, 2016The Corrosive Risks of Lawless Leadership
[Geoffrey S. Cornis Professor of Law at South Texas College of Law Houston in Houston Texas. Prior to joining the South Texas College of Law Houston faculty in 2005, Professor Corn served in the U.S. Army for 21 years as an officer, retiring in the ...