Author
Topic: Canon naming protocol (Read 4300 times)

rowanlamb

Here in Europe, the cameras that our American cousins refer to as T3 and T3i are called the 1100D and the 600D. I have a 400D, which they may know as the XTi. Basically, the names started at 300D and increased in 50 point increments up to the current 600D. The 1100D is an upgrade of the 1000D, and is quite obviously the bottom of the range. Sorry if I'm teaching you all to suck eggs, so to speak, but I want to establish a bit of context for those that are unaware of the difference in naming.

Anyway, my actual question is this - what happens when, in a few years, Canon reach the point where they've gotten all the way to 950D, and have nowhere to go? They can't go around to 1000D again. I realise this is some way off, but it's also inevitable unless a change is made to their European naming protocol. There's mention elsewhere on this forum that the 'D' portion of camera names nowadays are largely pointless - will canon ditch it altogether before their hand is forced? Will they go over to the XTi/T3/etc naming worldwide? Or will we go all Japanese and start shooting with Kiss X cameras? Of course, the xxD range can keep on going beyond 100D, but there'll still be some confusion over the fact that it'll then be a xxxD camera, at least in name.

Your thoughts on this admittedly silly subject gratefully received!

Logged

canon rumors FORUM

I've never been keen on the US naming system of random letters. I still need to look it up now and then which is which. And I just can't see Kiss being used outside Japan. When the numbers run out, they'll just start another new series of numbers. Look at CPU and GPU model names for an example of that in progress.

How far have we got anyway? Three more xxD and/or 7 xxxD models. That's still some way to go and I think there's a chance in that time mirrorless would have had a chance to make DSLRs as we know them redundant, sidestepping the problem.

There are 7 xxxD models already (300D-600D) and they have another 7 possible numbers before 1000D. That is at least 7 years to go. IMHO, it would be logical to name those cameras by the year, 2012D instead of 650D, or even drop the 2000 and make it 12D . They are making a new one each year anyways. However, in 7 years everything can change. They could drop all the DSLR thing (just like film SLR) and start something new, better. Maybe you will be able to download an image directly from your brain .

Anyway, my actual question is this - what happens when, in a few years, Canon reach the point where they've gotten all the way to 950D, and have nowhere to go? They can't go around to 1000D again.

In Canon's high end, compact P&S line, there was the S90, then the S95. The S100 was just announced as the S95-successor, 14 MP CMOS, 5x zoom, great IQ. But don't confuse the new PowerShot S100 with the PowerShot S100 that's an old, 2 MP, 2x zoom, cheap P&S.

rowanlamb

Anyway, my actual question is this - what happens when, in a few years, Canon reach the point where they've gotten all the way to 950D, and have nowhere to go? They can't go around to 1000D again.

In Canon's high end, compact P&S line, there was the S90, then the S95. The S100 was just announced as the S95-successor, 14 MP CMOS, 5x zoom, great IQ. But don't confuse the new PowerShot S100 with the PowerShot S100 that's an old, 2 MP, 2x zoom, cheap P&S.

On a similar note, Canon do the 500D close up filter as well as the body, but I guess their function is different enough the chances of them getting mixed up are minimal. Made it a pain for me to search for the close up filter though!

Anyway, my actual question is this - what happens when, in a few years, Canon reach the point where they've gotten all the way to 950D, and have nowhere to go? They can't go around to 1000D again.

In Canon's high end, compact P&S line, there was the S90, then the S95. The S100 was just announced as the S95-successor, 14 MP CMOS, 5x zoom, great IQ. But don't confuse the new PowerShot S100 with the PowerShot S100 that's an old, 2 MP, 2x zoom, cheap P&S.

So, I guess they could reuse a number...

And wait for the scammers on ebay advertising a $300 camera and shipping a $20 second-hand one?

Trying to make sense of Nikon's line apart from the D1-D3 is a lot worse, numbers are all over the place (even the D1 line is a bit weird, there was no D2, but 's' versions of both the D2H and D2X, then no D3H, and only the D3* were FF):D1>D1X>D2X>D2Xs>D3XD1H>D2H>D2Hs>D3>D3SD700D100>D200>D300>D300SD7000D70>D70s>D80>D90D50>D40X>D60>D5000>D5100D40>D3000>D3100

Glad i don't work in a camera shop and have to figure out all of that mess, canon's xD>xxD>xxxD>xxxxD just makes more sense.And no matter what, the xD line can continue indefinitely with mk* after the name. Maybe after 90D we get 91D? or 900D-> 910D? keeps the lines going another 10 rounds respectively...

canon rumors FORUM

rowanlamb

I did wonder whether they might start shortening the increments, i.e. 620D, 640D, 660D, etc, but I think from a marketing point of view they might suffer from the casual observer thinking 'well, they jumped from 550 to 600, but this new one is only 20 points "better" than the last one? What's wrong with it?'

I think we'll see a totally new naming system come up within the next 3 iterations.

I totally agree with you on Nikon's system by the way, it's a mess. I think the same about their lens names, but that's more because I can't be bothered to learn what all the letters mean.

I had this thought recently as well. There is a bigger problem than XX0D naming in X0D naming - you only have nine usable digits before you suddenly roll over to the 10D, and you don't want anybody to confuse the latest and greatest with the 10D from years past.

The pro or semi-pro series (1D, 5D, 7D) have the "advantage" of roman numeral numbering but even that will become obtuse in short order.

Of course, the real answer is that it's probably wishful thinking to believe the EOS format will stay static long enough for the naming convention to become limited. There's enough examples from the past to indicate that marketing, like the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park, "will find a way" but it's the engineering that will break with tradition enough that we get something totally new - perhaps. There is certainly a cachet associated with 1D but at the current rate it will be many years before they reach roman numeral X.