Gay Marriage opponents take fight to Starbucks overseas, NOM officially an international terrorist group

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Gay Marriage opponents take fight to Starbucks overseas, NOM officially an international terrorist group

National Organization for Marriage is planning a response to voter approval of gay marriage in recent elections, coordinating with middle-eastern anti-gay groups to target companies that support LGBT rights.

Putting Starbucks employees both gay and straight at risk of violence by the hands of extremists

Re: Gay Marriage opponents take fight to Starbucks overseas, NOM officially an international terrorist group

NOM consists of a lot of pathetic assholes. For years they've been bitching and whining "Let the voters decide". So when the voters don't vote the way they want, they have their little tempter tantrum. The problem is that their tantrum can get people killed. Brian Brown is the lowest, pathetic excuse of a closeted, self-hating cocksucker I've ever seen.

Re: Gay Marriage opponents take fight to Starbucks overseas, NOM officially an international terrorist group

The involvement of NOM in the whole Uganda situation was massively overstated by the far-left websites, as is this story.

For the OP to describe NOM as an 'international terrorist group' is just laughable and ridiculous. They're simply an American group opposed to gay marriage. That's it. Why all the hysteria?

It tells me a lot about the overly ideological far-left sensationalists around here that suddenly I'm expected to believe that NOM is some sort of well-connected worldwide superpower with ties to Middle East terrorism. I mean, WTF? It's fabricated nonsense.

Yes, I KNOW they're a closed-minded and intolerant bunch driven by Tea Party values and evangelical thought, but you do NOTHING for the credibility of your argument by inventing patently false lies and slander against them.

I get a bit tired of the misrepresented and inflamed statements like the OP's which instead of presenting FACTS rely purely on hyped-up emotive rhetoric.