Why would you trust someone who is convicted of doing crime, has affected a lot of lives and has greatly affected the country according to digong? At anung nakakatawa sa mga nangyari kanina? Kayo na natutuwa or nanood at nakayanan lahat ng nakita at narinig nyo ang nakakahiya! Anung nakakatawa sa nangyari kanina?

As Chief Justics, Vitaliano (peluka) Aguirre, is not even suppose to ask the questions to these witnesses. He is suppose to inhibit. Its the members of the senate. Dito pa lang may lapses na. How can a convicted felon be a credible witness against the one who put him in jail. Apart from being granted immunity, considering some where drug lords. I thought Duterte hates drug lords. Their testimonials are so scripted that it sounded like they were all kumpares who got drunk and making chismis about De Lima in this senate hearing. They were just mocking her. The nerve. No wonder despite all the character assassinations they did from the president himself to these witnesses today, De Lima still stood on her ground because she knows she is not guilty. Salute to this brave woman

Nasimulan mo ba hearing or not, if not here are some things maybe you missed1. It was clear from the beginning na si Sec. Aguirre ang magtatanong to verify ung affidavit nila then after ung cross examination which is mga solon na ang magtatanong2. Binigyan sila ng immunity, so everything that they will say can't be use against them. Free sila na magsalita

inhibit? why would he inhibit? he was the one presenting the witnesses. he is asking questions to point out why they were there AS WITNESSES. they were just presenting the witnesses and there would be questioning after the presentation kaya chillax lang. its the committee's job to prove if the witnesses are telling the truth or not. the immunity will only work if they were telling the truth if not then cases would be filed. kunwari matalino ka kung magsalita waley naman ikaw pala naiintindihan.