My article “10 Films That Barely Resemble the Books They’re Based on” was a huge hit a few weeks ago, receiving more comments than any of my other articles. One commenter, who went by the initials HJ, said, “I’d like to encourage you to write another article about movies that change book endings.” I was intrigued by that idea, so I have put together a list of 10 additional films that have endings that completely contradict the endings of the books they were inspired by.

1. The Count of Monte Cristo (2002)

Alexandre Dumas’ The Count of Monte Cristo is one of my favorite books. It is epic in scope and everything has an amazing payoff as the plot unfolds. Unfortunately, all of its subtleties are difficult to convey in a two-hour running time, so filmmakers are forced to cut a lot of corners. Thus, the 2002 version The Count of Monte Cristo (which is a great movie, by the way) combines a few characters and ties together several story threads to make the ending much cleaner.

Albert is now Edmond’s biological son, Fernand is killed in a duel rather than committing suicide, and no mention is ever made of Maximilien Morrel, his complex relationship with Valentine, or Edmond’s new love Haydée. The movie is an interesting take on the source material, but if you want to experience one of the most satisfying tales of your life, read the book.

2. First Blood

John Rambo dies at the end of David Morrell’s novel First Blood. After taking on an obsessed small-town sheriff in a guerilla war, Rambo is killed by his former commanding officer. The sheriff dies shortly after from a heart attack. I think the book is meant as an allegory for the approaches to the Korean War and the Vietnam War since the sheriff is a decorated Korean War veteran and Rambo is a Vietnam War veteran who has become an aimless drifter. It’s as much a psychological war as a physical one.

However, the movie turns Rambo into an underdog hero who the audience roots for rather than feels sorry for. They originally shot an ending where Rambo gets killed, but test audiences reacted poorly to such a depressing conclusion so they changed it and let Rambo live. After three sequels, it’s hard to imagine Rambo as anything but an unkillable soldier. The author of First Blood was a good sport about the complete reversal of his ending. He even wrote the novelization of the film’s sequel Rambo:First Blood Part II.

3. The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996)

Oh, Disney. You make such wonderful movies that reinvent fairy tales, like Rapunzel and Beauty and the Beast. But other times you go and try to ruin classic books like The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Victor Hugo’s novel has one of the most famously tragic endings ever with Quasimodo failing to save Esmeralda from death by hanging. Unable to live now that his love is dead, he cradles her dead body until he dies of starvation.

When the good folks at Walt Disney Pictures decided to turn this tale into an animated film for children, of course they couldn’t use that ending. It probably would have scarred kids for life. But their solution to the problem is to remove anything even resembling the original story and turn it into a quasi-feel-good flick. Esmeralda lives, but she’s fallen in love with someone else. But Quasimodo gets over her pretty quick as the townspeople of Paris finally accept him despite his hideous appearance. It’s not even a pale imitation of Hugo’s novel.

4. Jurassic Park

Steven Spielberg was a genius at focusing complex novels into straightforward action-adventure films. He did it with Jaws and Jurassic Park to great success. Michael Crichton’s book Jurassic Park ends with John Hammond and possibly Ian Malcolm dead. The military bombs the entire island for good measure. The few survivors of the ordeal are likely to face the rest of their lives in legal limbo with Costa Rica and the United States. Not a pretty sight.

In Spielberg’s Jurassic Park, Hammond and Malcolm live, we don’t see any military strikes on the island, and it’s never even hinted at that the survivors will face any legal challenges (thank goodness because their lawyer got eaten in the second act). Spielberg knew how to tell a satisfying story while also leaving people hungry for more.

5. The Little Mermaid

Ariel dies at the end of Hans Christian Andersen’s classic story The Little Mermaid. That’s right. The prince marries someone else, which breaks Ariel’s heart. She never gets her voice back and she dies in agony. But all is not lost because she does obtain an immortal soul, which is apparently something mer-people don’t have. But still, that’s a really sad ending to a children’s story.

The Disney animated film of the same name has a much better ending. Ariel and the prince work together to stop the Sea Witch and then magically wind up together in the end as husband and wife, even though she’s only 16 and he is a sailor who apparently has never been aboard a ship that hasn’t sunk. Something tells me this might end badly. By the way, does anyone else find it ironic that a character named Ariel lives underwater? It’s like naming a space shuttle “The Submarine.”

6. The Lorax

Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax is an interesting departure from his usual fare. It ends with a real downer. The Once-ler spends the whole book telling his sad tale about how he over-harvested a special kind of tree to the point of extinction. He then gives a young man the last seed of the tree he had destroyed and encourages him to plant it. Hopefully it will develop into a forest one day.

The 2012 film The Lorax turns this somber climax into a cheerful one. The young man who the Once-ler gave the seed to races to plant the seed (why he’s in a hurry to do so, I’m not sure), and he overcomes all obstacles and manages to do the deed. Things start to turn around and pretty soon the tree multiplies into a forest, and the environment is saved. The book suggested that such a chain of events was possible, but it left open the possibility of failure, as well. You can take your pick about which is better, but I prefer the more challenging ending of the book.

7. Planet of the Apes

There are numerous differences between the Planet of the Apes novel and film, but the ending is the biggest. Ulysse (whose name was changed to Taylor in the film) marries Nova and has a son with her. He takes them in a spaceship back to Earth from the apes’ planet and discovers that it, too, has been overrun by intelligent apes. He takes his family and departs for uncharted territory in the end.

The ending of the 1968 film Planet of the Apes is so iconic if you haven’t seen the film, you probably still know how it ends. It turns out that Taylor has been on Earth the whole time, even though he thought he was on a distant planet. He’s stranded there with his companion Nova. The haunting final image is of him mourning over humanity’s fall in front of a tattered Statue of Liberty on a forsaken beach. Radically changing the book’s ending was a very smart thing to do in this case.

8. The Scarlet Letter

I don’t remember Native Americans playing a significant role at all in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter. But for some reason the filmmakers decided their dramatic film needed an action-packed climax to spice things up, even if that completely undermines the message of the book and comes across as insulting.

Hester Prynne is about to be hanged (in a scene that is nowhere to be found in the book), but she is saved by her tragic lover who is then saved by a sudden Native American attack on the town. Rather than having him confess his sin in a sort of deathbed-repentance kind of way, the film turns it into an unquestionably noble act. There are several other changes, but this is definitely this film’s greatest sin.

9. Sphere

Michael Crichton’s Sphere is a great novel. A team of scientists discover a spacecraft at the bottom of the ocean and they try to figure out its origin and purpose. Over the course of the book, three people enter a strange object known only as “the Sphere” and gain extraordinary mental abilities. Those three inadvertently kill all the other scientists until they are rescued. Because their power is impossible to control, they decide to erase their memories and get rid of their powers once and for all. However, the book ends with a clever suggestion that one of the characters did not actually give up her powers or memories.

The film takes a more literal approach. When the three scientists decide to get rid of their memories and powers, the Sphere lifts up out of the ocean and flies away. Why? Your guess is as good as mine. It could have at least left a note that said, “See you around.”

10. The Towering Inferno

The Towering Inferno is a unique film for many reasons, not the least of which is the fact that it is based on two books, not one: The Tower and The Glass Inferno. I haven’t read The Glass Inferno, but I have read The Tower, and its ending could not be more dissimilar from the film’s. In the book, the solution to getting the people out of the building is to launch a breeches buoy to slowly get one person out at a time. As the situation gets desperate, an unruly group tries to violently take control of the buoy to save themselves. But they are subdued and order prevails right up to the moment when the people who didn’t have time to escape are burned alive.

The Towering Inferno includes many of these elements. A breeches buoy is used to get most of the women out, but a group of men try to seize control of it once the women are gone. All their mutiny does is to destroy the buoy, preventing anyone else from getting out that way. The people who remain behind are saved when huge water tanks are exploded above them, finally putting out the fire. So it’s a fairly happy ending for most involved. To answer the burning question, which ending is better: I honestly can’t decide. They’re both great in their own way.

Conclusion

Once again, I welcome your thoughts on this list and any other films that completely mangled books’ endings or changed them for the better. HJ suggested I discuss My Sister’s Keeper, but I’ve never read the book or seen the movie. I apologize for not including it, but I just wouldn’t have been able to do it justice.

This is the Deja Reviewer bidding you farewell until we meet again.

All images are the copyright of their respective owners.

(EDIT: I originally wrote that the Once-ler planted the seed in the 2012 film The Lorax. This is incorrect, and I fixed it above.)

Rate this:

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

About Robert Lockard, the Deja Reviewer

Robert Lockard has been a lover of writing since he was very young. He studied public relations in college, graduating with a Bachelor’s degree in 2006. His skills and knowledge have helped him to become a sought-after copywriter in the business world. He has written blogs, articles, and Web content on subjects such as real estate, online marketing and inventory management. His talent for making even boring topics interesting to read about has come in handy. But what he really loves to write about is movies. His favorite movies include: Fiddler on the Roof, Superman: The Movie, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, Back to the Future, Beauty and the Beast, The Fugitive, The Incredibles, and The Dark Knight. Check out his website: Deja Reviewer.
Robert lives in Utah with his wife and three children. He loves running, biking, reading, and watching movies with his family.

65 Responses to 10 Films That Contradict the Endings of the Books They’re Based on

I’ve never actually read that book, though I do know that Truman Capote wrote it. I haven’t read In Cold Blood, either. I might just have to check out his books sometime. The film Breakfast at Tiffany’s is certainly a good romantic comedy.

I hate to admit, but I haven’t read The Grapes of Wrath. I have read Of Mice and Men and a few other Depression-era novels, but that one has somehow slipped off my radar. I believe I remember that the book was controversial at the time because of the somewhat explicit act at the very end of it. The filmmakers probably had to change the ending for code reasons back then.

ignore the movie completely, and read the book. The movie seems to be a Murphy’s Law example of book-to-film adaption: if Costner et al. could find a way to f*ck it up, they did. The book’s great; the movie sucks.

I Am Legend. In the book, the hero gives up hope for humanity and goes out in a blaze of glory, killing as many vampires as he can, knowing that the vampires will remember him as one of their most dangerous enemies.

In the movie, the infected are more like unthinking zombies, the hero sacrifices his life as he saves humanity, knowing that people will remember him for his deeds. An incredibly stupid “send the audience home happy with a good ending” change that just ruined the whole story.

The extras on the DVD/Blu Ray release of that movie has the alternate ending where the scientist realizes the “unthinking monsters” are actually thinking creatures and that he’s the monster that’s been kidnapping and torturing them.

Seriously. I covered that a little in my earlier article 10 Films That Barely Resemble the Books They’re Based on, though I focused on The Omega Man, rather than the Will Smith remake. They both suffer from the same problem, failing to understand what the book was all about. They just don’t understand the appeal of irony.

Arthur C. Clarke did the same thing with his sequel: 2010. He based it on the film 2001: A Space Odyssey rather than his book. In the book, the Discovery goes to Saturn, but in the film it goes to Jupiter. There were a few other changes, but that was the biggest one.

The Horse Whisperer. It wasn’t much of a book and I was glad Redford changed the ending – hero survived, heroine went home to her husband. I’m not a prude but this was one time that a love story was definitely not called for. The book was more Hollywood than the movie!

I never actually made it to the end of the film The Horse Whisperer. Once the horse and the girl recovered and learned to trust again, I thought the story was over. When it kept going, I knew I was in for a lot of melodrama and other stuff I just wasn’t interested in, so I decided to leave it on a high note.

Neil Jordan’s THE END OF THE AFFAIR (1999) not only betrays Graham Greene’s novel, it subverts the very NAME OF THE STORY. It’s actually a very faithful adaptation of the first half of the novel — right up to the point where, in the novel, THE AFFAIR ENDS, but in the movie the affair is only postponed, and resumes again later on.

If you’re going to change the whole premise of the title, shouldn’t you retitle the movie? I realize “THE POSTPONEMENT OF THE AFFAIR” doesn’t have the same ring, but that’s apparently the movie Jordan wanted to make for some reason.

I’d nominate “The Firm” as an essential one. A wonderful, and arguably his best, novel by John Grisham, the book gave you the creeps. You almost viscerally felt the walls closing in on you.
If the old phrase “it’s not paranoia if everyone really IS out to get you” was ever true, it’s true here.

But with the movie, ….meh.

Cruise and Holly Hunter do a fine job, but it’s just too neat and tidy, and doesn’t get into any of the real intrigue of the novel. Actually, the last third of the book is a completely different plot entirely.

If you’ve never read it AND watched the film, I recommend you read the book first.
Then you can be just as massively disappointed as I was.

That’s one of Grisham’s books that I haven’t read, actually. I loved The Client and The Pelican Brief. Sounds like I’m missing out. In my opinion, Sydney Pollack was always an overrated director. Any of his movies, even the good ones, would probably have been better in someone else’s hands.

I’ll definitely be sure to read the book before watching the film in this case. Thanks for the tip!

The Horse’s Mouth. If I’d ever had a chance to talk to Alec Guinness, I’d have ignored Star Wars and asked him about his screen adaptation of the Joyce Carey novel. One of his finest screen characters, so he’s more than forgiven for the flip.

I will have to check that one out. I’m a huge fan of Alec Guinness, especially his work in David Lean’s films, like The Bridge on the River Kwai (also a superb adaptation of a book). Thank you for the recommendation.

My Sister’s Keeper should be the top of the list. In the movie theater, you could tell exactly who read the book, for all the gasps and screams. I’d also list A Patch of Blue. The movie made the ending much more hopeful and less traumatic.

I enjoyed The Notebook and A Walk to Remember, though I haven’t seen any of the more recent Nicholas Sparks-inspired films yet. I do like happy endings, but not if they feel contrived. Sometimes a good downer is exactly what a story calls for, like The Dark Knight or The Empire Strike Back. I might have to compare Dear John’s book and movie to see which is superior. Thanks for mentioning it.

The movie definitely contradicts the book at the end, but I’ve heard that Stanley Kubrick didn’t even know about the book’s final chapter until he had completed his film, so I don’t think the ending change was intentional.

I especially loved your section on The Count of Monte Cristo — as soon as I saw the article title that is what immediately sprang to mind! It is one of my all-time favorite novels, I reread it every couple of years.

Thank you. That is one of my favorite books, too. I love how subtle it is and the rollercoaster of emotions it puts the reader through. They would have to turn it into a miniseries to fully capture all of its details on film.

There is a miniseries…but it’s in French with subtitles. Definitely check it out! Stars Gerard Depardieu. It keeps most of the plot intact while changing the ending of the book, which I never did like. Mercedes just didn’t deserve what Dumas gave her. Although, I liked the idea that Albert was Edmond’s son rather than Ferdinand’s in the 2002 version.

That sounds like the 2009 film Watchmen. The whole movie was practically a recreation of the graphic novel, and the ending (while producing the same effect) was altered in a way that left some fans a little upset. I was fine with it, though.

The Devil Wears Prada. In both stories, the antagonist leaves her boss from hell stranded, but in the book she screams obscenities at her as she leaves. When she finally gets another job, it’s because she’s become a legend for telling the witch off publicly. It’s a triumph for a maligned worker! At the end of the movie, she gets a job because her boss gives her a good reference and when they see each other on the street later, the boss smiles at her like a sweet mentor. Turned around the story so that management retained the upper hand in this woman’s career. SO disappointing!

“Logan’s Run” by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson. The book takes place in a 24-hour period versus several days in the film version. The sandman weapon isn’t a flamegun but rather modified six-shooter with as many various charges: needler, nitro, ripper, vapor, tangler and homer (I can’t believe I still remember that!). People only live until 21 instead of 30, and so on. If the book were faithfully adapted it might get an NC-17 rating. I enjoyed both versions for different reasons. The book is a quick read and spawned a few sequels.