1. Is murder always an unpardonable sin?
2. Was Moses' killing of the Egyptian an act of murder?

IS MURDER ALWAYS AN UNPARDONABLE SIN?

Observe carefully the wording in the Doctrine and Covenants:

And now, behold, I speak unto the church. Thou shalt
not kill; and he that kills shall not have forgiveness in this world, nor in the world to
come (emphasis added).1

And it shall come to pass, that if any persons among you
shall kill they shall be delivered up and dealt with according to the laws of the land;
for remember that he hath no forgiveness; and it shall be proved according to the laws of
the land (emphasis added).2

The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, which shall not be forgiven in
the world nor out of the world, is in that ye commit murder wherein ye shed innocent
blood, and assent unto my death, after ye have received my new and everlasting covenant,
sayeth the Lord God... (emphasis added)3

The Doctrine and Covenants is quite clear in applying the
"unpardonable" qualifier "to the church," that is, to those who
have accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior and covenanted to obey the laws and ordinances
of the gospel.4 This application is in
agreement with the Bible, which teaches that

...it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have
tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted
the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to
renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh,
and put him to an open shame (emphasis added).5

...if we sin willfully after that we have received the knowledge
of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful
looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries
(emphasis added).

He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three
witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who
hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant,
wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of
grace? For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will
recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. It is
a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (emphasis added).6

Moses killed the Egyptian7
before he had received the knowledge of the truth on Mount
Sinai.8 Therefore,
even if his action in killing the Egyptian was murder, according to the Scriptures, Moses
would not have committed the unpardonable sin.

DID MOSES COMMIT MURDER?

And it came to pass in those days, when Moses was grown, that he
went out unto his brethren, and looked on their burdens: and he spied an Egyptian smiting
an Hebrew, one of his brethren. And he looked this way and that way, and when he saw
that there was no man, he slew the Egyptian, and hid him in the sand.9

The Hebrew word for "slew" used in Ex.
2:12 is "nakah" (pronounced naw-kaw). This word has several meanings, the
primary of which is:

While the definition can include murder, murder is a
secondary definition. In contrast the word used in Ex. 2:12 is different from the
word used in Ex. 20:13 wherein the Lord said: "Thou shalt not kill."
The Hebrew word for "kill" in this case is "ratsach." Strong
defines this word to mean:

It should be very apparent that in the Ten
Commandments, the clear meaning of "ratsach" is murder.

Bible commentators identify what occurred in Ex.
2:12 as a slaying instead of murder.12 It is
significant that Bible commentators also point out that the Bible nowhere condemns Moses'
action. Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown tell us:

This act of Moses...by some has been condemned
as rash and unjustifiable--in plain terms a deed of assassination. But...not only is
it not spoken of as a crime in Scripture or as distressing the perpetrator with remorse,
but according to existing customs among nomadic tribes, he was bound to avenge the blood
of a brother.13

Not only do we have the example of different
words in Hebrew to express various concepts of killing and their relative seriousness, but
we have the same situation in our English language. Englishdictionaries contain a variety of words to convey the degree of
seriousness and circumstances of different forms of taking life. For instance in one
prominent dictionary the defnintion of kill includes the following note:

KILL, SLAY, MURDER, ASSASSINATE, DISPATCH, EXECUTE mean to deprive
of life. KILL merely states the fact of death caused by an agency in any manner; SLAY is a
chiefly literary term implying deliberateness and violence but not necessarily motive;
MURDER specifically implies stealth and motive and premeditation and therefore full moral
responsibility; ASSASSINATE applies to deliberate killing openly or secretly but for
impersonal motives; DISPATCH implies nothing beside speed and directness in putting to
death; EXECUTE applies to the carrying out of a sentence to death.14

The same dictionary defines murder as:

the crime of unlawfully killing a person esp. with malice
aforethought

KILL, v. To deprive of life; to destroy the life of an
animal or person. The word "homicide" expresses the killing of a human being. .
. . The word "kill" contains no implication of crime.16

MURDER. The unlawful killing of a human being by another with
malice aforethought, either express or implied.17

The Hebrew commentator Rashi states that rather than simply hitting
the Hebrew a few times (as might be inferred from the text), the Egyptian taskmaster was

...beating and flogging him. The [Hebrew] was the husband of
Shelomith, the daughter of Dibri (see Levit. XXIV. 11), and the Egyptian taskmaster had
set his fancy upon her. During the night he compelled him (her husband) to rise and
made him leave the house. He, however, returned, entered the house and forced his
attentions upon the woman, she believing it was her husband. The man returned and
became aware of what had happened, and when the Egyptian perceived that he was aware of it
he beat him and flogged him the whole day long (ib.).18

Such a beating would probably have killed the Hebrew, which may very
well have been the Egyptian's intention. The killing of one engaged in attacking
another is a case of excusable homicide, not murder.

The rules relating to the use of deadly force to save a third party
from death or serious injury bear an obvious relation to the doctrines of
self-defense. It is generally held...that homicide is excused when the actor
reasonably believed the deceased to be the aggressor and the killing to be necessary to
save the third party's life...it is generally held...that one may kill to prevent
commission of a violent felony when he reasonably believes that such use of deadly force
is necessary.19

Some have argued that since Moses "looked this way and that
way," he was necessarily guilty of murder. These people refuse to consider
other explanations for Moses' looking around. Moses' position was precarious with
respect to Egyptian politics and intrigues. Josephus states:

One of those sacred scribes...told the king, that about this time
there would be a child born to the Israelites, who, if he were reared, would bring the
Egyptian dominion low, and would raise the Israelites... . Which thing was so feared
by the king, that...he commanded that they should cast every male child, which was born to
the Israelites, into the river, and destroy it...20

Thermuthis...adopted him [the baby Moses] for her
son...and...carried Moses to her father... . And...she put the infant into her
father's hands: so he took him, and hugged him close to his breast; and...put his
diadem upon his head; but Moses threw it down to the ground, and...wreathed it round, and
trod upon it with his feet... . But when the sacred scribe saw this...he made a
violent attempt to kill him: and crying out in a frightful manner, he said, "This, O
king! This child is he of whom God foretold, that if we kill him we shall be in no danger;
he himself affords an attestation to the prediction of the same thing, by his trampling
upon thy government, and treading upon thy diadem. Take him, therefore, out of the
way, and deliver him; and deprive the Hebrews of the hope they have of being encouraged by
him." But Thermuthis prevented him, and snatched the child away.21

Now the Egyptians...entertained a hatred to him, and were very eager
in compassing their designs against him, as suspecting that he would take occasion, from
his good success to raise a sedition, and bring innovations into Egypt; and told the king
he ought to be slain. The king had also some intentions of himself to the same purpose,
and...being instigated by the sacred scribes, he was ready to undertake to kill Moses; but
when he had learned beforehand what plots there were against him he went away privately;
and because the public roads were watched, he took his flight through the deserts, and
where his enemies could not suspect he would travel...22

From the above it is apparent that for Moses' entire life in the
Egyptian court he had to deal with government groups that wanted him dead. He had
good reason to be concerned that his defense of his Hebrew brother might be observed and
reported. Such a report would have provided an excuse to have him killed.

Conclusion

The Bible does not call Moses a murderer nor does it anywhere
condemn his action in killing the Egyptian. In the eyes of God, and according to the
law of most, if not all, human societies, this killing was excusable homicide, not murder.

The critics are in error in their suppositions that all killings are
murder, that every murder, regardless of circumstances, is viewed by the LDS as an
unpardonable sin, and that Moses was a murderer. The presence of Moses on the mount
of transfiguration is consistent with both the Bible and the Doctrine and Covenants.

Earliest known discussion: This one.

Notes:

1.Doctrine
and Covenants 42:18. Hereafter referred to as D&C.

2.D&C
42:79.

3.D&C
132:27.

4. See Pearl
of Great Price, Articles of Faith 3 and 4.

5. Hebrews
6:4-6.

6. Hebrews
10:26-31.

7. Exodus 2

8. Exodus 3

9. Exodus
2:11-12.

10. James Strong, The Exhaustive Concordance of The Bible,
(Riverside Book and Bible House, Iowa Falls, Iowa: n.d.), Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary:
78, #5221. Hereafter refered to as Strong.

13. Jamieson, Robert, A. R. Fausset, David Brown, A Commentary
Critical and Explanatory of the Old and New Testaments, Volumes I and II, Second Large
"Clear Type" Edition, (Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, MI: n.d.): 49.