“People have short memories,” Knutson said. “If it’s an isolated incident, there isn’t any one that hasn’t cooked in his or her kitchen that hasn’t found a foreign object in their food.”

Some readers like alberoone said it would be a shame if the incident caused the restaurant to close its doors:

"It's really sad when you consider what one isolated incident can do to the reputation of a restaurant. This bad PR will certainly cause many to refrain from eating at Arby's for quite some time if ever at all again… I am confident anyone that chooses to visit Arby's on West Ave will be treated to a fresh Quality product and not have to fear anything extra will be accompanying their meal.”

“Everything will have been cleaned to the smallest detail, every staff member will be happy to see you, and every safety and quality standard will be under review.”

Skott said it was an accident and nothing more:

“means it wasn't on purpose and doesn't happen all the time. Also, the reports say it was just part of a finger, the bit with the prints, you people keep making it seem like it was a whole finger. Sucks it happened, it wasn't on purpose, grow up and move on.”

Alan agreed that it was an accident but said it was not properly take care of after the fact:

“When this sort of thing does happen it should not result in blood or body parts being served in the food. It's not a good sign for safety and health standards at this location.”

Josh said he has lost trust in the restaurant:

“I don't care if it was an accident... you can not let that happen or continue to serve customers after an incident like that!”

Would finding a foreign object, like a piece of a finger, in your meal keep you from returning to a restaurant?