To comply with European Union law, we are required to inform users accessing "overunity.com" from within the
EU about the cookies that this site uses and the information they contain and also provide them with the means
to "opt-in" - in other words, permit the site to set cookies.
Cookies are small files that are stored by your browser and all browsers have an option whereby you can inspect
the content of these files and delete them if you wish.

The following table details the name of each cookie, where it comes from and what we know about the information
that cookie stores:

Cookie

Origin

Persistency

Information and Usage

ecl_auth

overunity.com

Expires after 30 days

This cookie contains the text "EU Cookie Law - LiPF cookies authorised".
Without this cookie, the Forums' software is prevented from setting other cookies.

SMFCookie648

overunity.com

Expires according to user-chosen session duration

If you log-in as a member of this site, this cookie contains your user name, an encrypted hash of
your password and the time you logged-in. It is used by the site software to ensure that features such as indicating
new Forum and Private messages are indicated to you. This cookie is essential for the site software to work correctly.

PHPSESSID

overunity.com

Current session only

This cookie contains a unique Session Identification value. It is set for both members and
non-members (guests) and it is essential for the site software to work correctly. This cookie is not persistent
and should be automatically removed when you close the browser window.

pmx_upshr{NAME}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records your display preferences for the site's Portal page if a panel
or individual block is collapsed or expanded

pmx_pgidx_blk{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the page number for the site's Portal page if the page for a
individual block is changed.

pmx_cbtstat{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the expand/collapse state for a CBT Navigator block content.

pmx_poll{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the id for the current poll in a multiple Poll block.

pmx_{fadername}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the state for a Opac-Fader block.

pmx_LSBsub{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the current category and the state for a static Category block.

pmx_shout{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the current state of a Shout box block.

pmx_php_ckeck

overunity.com

Page load time

This cookie will probably never see you. It is set, if a Syntax check on a PHP block is initiated
and will be deleted if the function executed.

pmx_YOfs

overunity.com

Page load time

This cookie will probably never see you. It is set on portal actions like click on a page number.
The cookie is evaluated on load the desired page and then deleted. It is used to restore the vertical screen position
as before the click.

Notes:

1

We are aware that Google uses additional cookies it stores on your PC and when you browse our site and all other
sites. These are used to target advertising and Google currently does this without seeking your permission. Four of
these cookies we know about are named "rememberme", "NID", "PREF" and "PP_TOS_ACK"
and are stored in Google's cache on your computer.

2

If you are accessing this site using someone else's computer, please ask the owner's permission before
accepting cookies.

3

Your browser provides you with the ability to inspect all cookies stored on your PC. In addition your browser
is responsible for removing "current session only" cookies and those that have expired; if your browser is
not doing this, you should report the matter to your browser's authors.

4

We regret and apologies for any inconvenience this causes to members and guests who are accessing our web site
from outside the European Union. It is not currently possible for us to interrogate your browser and obtain geographic
location information in order to decide whether or not to prompt you to accept cookies.

For further and fuller information about cookies and their use, please visit
All About Cookies

We put 50% of the input back to the negative rail effectively destroying the dipole, so we got 50% to use in our circuit with all losses of that said circuit. That is how we are taught to make circuits and I don't think it is a mistake, but a deliberate scheme to keep those circuits ineffective.

So in my mind the question really is how to agitate charges without dumping back to the source dipole? We have such techniques and we can go around laws like Lenz, but you can pickup any electrical engineering book and it is telling that is the wrong way or it does not mention these techniques at all. I don't think is a coincidence either.

After 2 years of 'research' I went back and watched all the Don Smith videos again. He is really trying to tell us something, but you really gotta listen.

PS.

I wonder what is hiding in the original Maxwell's equations, that Steinmetz and others changed so that they could be easily used in engineering. Quaternion != Vector. I think it is the same if a 2D map is used to describe this planet

Bearden, and at a lower level Don Smith, have theories but not the least working device, not even a proof of concept. In science we must verify and confirm theories by experiments.

For example, let's take the Lenz law you mentioned. Lenz's law is only the consequence that moving charges influence each other via the magnetic field.The only force on charges is F=q.E with E the electric field either deriving from a potential or, in our case, obtained by a varying magnetic field in which case E=v x B (vector product), v being the speed of the charges relative to the observer who also sees the B field which is the result of moving charges.Therefore, the situation is symmetrical between the charges of the source of the magnetic field and the moving charges in the field created by the former. From the viewpoint of the charges at the source of the magnetic field, there is no magnetic field (because they are at rest in their own referential) but they see the varying magnetic field of the moving external charges.The effect of the former on the latter is strictly identical to the effect of the latter on the former, since there is only one physical cause, the relative velocity between charges, resulting in a force (also explicable by Einstein's relativity). So if Lenz's law did not apply, the effect that gives rise to it would not exist either, induction would not exist. Lenz's law and induction law are one and the same, just a question of which charges we look at.

There are many IQ >140 among physicists, we must be very careful to challenge their theories that they have also verified through thousands meticulous experiments. If there is a possibility of free energy, we will have to be very, very, very smart to find it. Or to have an extraordinary luck. It's what we play at.

Yeah well it is all theories until you have it running on your bench and if it is not self looped I tend not to watch the video. When it is self looped you can forget all measuring error debunkers. Self looping with a battery is also BS Bedini style. I bet you can get OU from a battery system by somehow destroying the battery at the same time. Self loop with caps and I will give you a medal for sure!

Just use 4k video to shoot it, so the "wire finders" can have a good look at it

Many! In electronics, since the age of 11. That's why I'm very careful now. All the experiments in FE I have done so far (single wire transmission, back emf, SMOT, so-called "scalar waves", Steorn-style parametric motors...) show that everything works according to conventional theories.

Cool, many people can work a lifetime and never see anything extraordinary while others just naturally stumble onto it. This is because we are obviously not the same people and we do not think the same and nobody should assume we do.

Quote

Quote

I'm looking for loopholes but I haven't found any yet. Most of those who believe they have found them are only surprised by commonplace phenomena that they do not understand.

Obviously your not looking hard enough and this relates to the concept of "learning how to learn". I see many people who think learning is simply memorizing what others have done however memorizing is more akin to pseudo-learning not genuine learning. To truly learn something new requires an open mind and independence from others not conformity. No person who has ever accomplished anything great or innovative has conformed to anything in the way of normalcy.

Here we see the concept of Exergy or the absolute energy within the entirety of a system which is available to perform work. As well as an introduction to the concept that Kinetic energy and Potential energy in a system are not always intimately bound to one another as we might expect. Treshalov does a poor job of explaining the concept however the foundation is present.

Learning is about progress and if we have made no progress then obviously we have not learned anything. As one intellectual put it we have lived in a lost decade in which nothing of consequence has happened that matters.

I have said this before, but when a person that has not come up with anything original teaches kids to do the same, we get to where we are now. After that the teacher and the students are effectively living in a matrix, that was put over their eyes. Anybody that is trying to use their brain is quickly ridiculed back to the flock and we continue on for the next 100 years. The problem here being we might not have another 100 years before things get irreversible. Just like religious people might have a crucifix on their wall the teacher has his Harward diploma on the wall to remind him, that he is a priest and not a scientist. The religion is just different.

You can use your brain, but inside the framework they have provided. You can bet your ass the framework was designed so, that nothing new (old?) and magical is ever found. You can accomplish this by setting the framework and accompanying rules in this way. Everything new comes up by accident and it needs to happen to a person that has the balls to take it forward. Everything new we discover comes about by accident or from a person that is said to be crazy, but we still teach students to be normal and forget all this other nonsense!?! Now that is crazy. Bacteria?!? Smaller that the eye can see?!? Nonsense. Lets put some cow shit on the wound and prepare a mercury drink for the patient...

I get told every week, that I should do normal things and think like normal people. That is another artificial construct. The only outcome of that is that we keep on peddling the mouse wheel for the 1%. Close your eyes and wait for death.

I think the key is to do something differently. If we haven't found the answers yet, it means we are asking the wrong questions. Now why is that? It must be in something in the very basics of the sciences that is totally wrong. Maybe it is just stupidity or maybe it is a deliberate cover up. Everything in archaeology is a temple or a tomb. Maybe they are labs and power plants? People keep destroying shit they do not understand, because there is a risk someone does understand and then they are obsolete. Burn the library of Alexandria. Sumerian history is just mythology and on the other hand Jesus was real and Mohammed was riding a white unicorn to the heavens when he died...

We need to dig way deeper. Have a couple of joints and sleep outside in a tent. Is the Universe about life or is it about death? If it is about life, then we are being provided all we need without us needing to destroy life. So something like fission is an abomination to the whole Creation. Fukushima is a good example. So much death because we want to watch "fuckpile island" on TV. If there is a Creator that sure as shit is not a white bearded old dude sitting on a cloud making deals with one human tribe so they have an eternal license to kill to get their Promised Land. My opinion is that the universe always was or it came about because of some event that produced the first vibrations. Everything is light and vibration. So my church is the universe and everything in it. Infinite possibilities of vibrations to unite and produce stuff like us. So every time you sing a song it is a praise to the Creation. Simple things matter like why do you want to do it in the shower where there are "all the frequencies" present?

The answer to energy might be somewhere before Ampere's (empirical!) law. All we need is to change the "as we all know" to "why?". I am not interested in the 99% that our current rules explain. It is the 1% anomalies I am interested in. We are still using vector representations of Maxwell's equations and if you hit an anomaly you are told just to "ground the shit out of it". We are actively trying to force the 1% into the 99%.

Also I believe that if I look at the stars and have an urge to go see them, that means there is a way to do it. It might be antigravity, free energy or remote viewing, but there is a way. It is this fundamental urge that leads to discovery. I don't think a cat looks at the stars and go "hmm I wanna fly there and meet other species". The cat does not look at the stars!

@F6FLT

I hope you are not too deep into the current dogma, that you can step out of your comfort zone. Everything works to the conventional theories, because that is the way we do research and that is the way we measure. I do believe in the scientific method. I just don't believe in the framework we are given as the basis

People believe in God, but they don't think there are other universes or dimension? Maybe you can resonate something that it pulls crap from another dimension or universe? It is a human perception that this needs gigawatts of power, if at all possible.

Elon Musk said we might be living in a simulation and we need to be weary of letting AI loose. Well who says computer need to be wires and chips? Are we not the AI already? We might be here as an experiment to see if we can figure out the problem the "Creator" has. Maybe the Creator is a machine an this is a simulation. The machine came across an anomaly and we were created to figure it out. It could be consciousness, love or what ever.

Hmm only saw that video so maybe I do not fully follow what is going on.

One thing came to mind. On the video there is a claim that 105g is pulling 115g up so there is OU.

But I did not see 105g pull up 115g. I saw a finger pushing the sliding unit, that had 105g on it claiming only 105g was pulled. When a finger is used you pull up 105g PLUS anything the magnet interaction needs to get his done. So 105g was pulled plus any work the magnets needed for separation.

...Obviously your not looking hard enough and this relates to the concept of "learning how to learn". I see many people who think learning is simply memorizing what others have done however memorizing is more akin to pseudo-learning not genuine learning. To truly learn something new requires an open mind and independence from others not conformity. No person who has ever accomplished anything great or innovative has conformed to anything in the way of normalcy. ...

Unfortunately, the facts deny what you say. Where does the energy you currently use come from? What makes it easy for you to communicate with anyone everywhere? With what do you travel around the planet? Why are you talking about "electric or magnetic fields", "forces", "energy", "momentum", "power"?Are all these devices you use and these concepts you handle, the products of scientists and engineers, or of do-it-yourselfers and handymen?

A new idea appears when it is mature, that is, when the context of human knowledge has reached a point from which it can emerge in the minds of some, the best prepared, so-called "pioneers" (for example in electricity, Coulomb, Ampère, Ørsted, Faraday, Maxwell, Tesla).As Louis Pasteur said, "luck favours prepared minds".Those who innovate are those who know the state of the art, and are therefore able in their observations to differentiate between what is well known and what is new, or are able to find new ways to explore rather than re-invent hot water.

When I see hundreds of posts just on the single wire transmission, I feel like I see children playing a puzzle for which they obviously don't have all the pieces. When you have an electronics engineer background, you know that any device is always inductively or capacitively coupled to its environment, even a simple wire, and you know whether you can neglect its inductance or capacitance, or not. In this case, the components at the wire termination are always more or less coupled to the ground or the generator, so we have a conventional circuit looped by a capacity in the order of pF, and the energy is well drawn from the generator (I myself wasted my time doing the measurement). The unprepared minds do not see any capacitor, so they shout "Miracle!", unable like children to understand that they are missing parts. The prepared minds include capacities in their schema, and perfectly model single wire transmission with LTspice.

Until now, prepared minds have given us energy. It's not free but it's real, we use it every day. Until now, unprepared minds gave us only dreams, promises or obscure theories that produce nothing (except scams). Unfortunately, dreams and promises do neither power my PC nor warm my house.Remember that even Tesla was an electrical and mechanical engineer, he received a higher education in engineering and physics at the University of Graz. Truly innovative technical ideas never come out of nowhere, not even from a handyman in his garage. You don't need to have a university education to have ideas, nevertheless if you want your ideas beat those of "prepared minds" in matter of operational technology, you must prepare yourself, and at least acquire the basics. Otherwise, you are seriously handicapped because like children, you turn pieces all over the place hoping to plug the holes in the puzzle, without ever producing anything useful (or you invoke the holes as source of ZPE, slipping from science to religious incantation ).

Very well stated F6FLT. I agree with you one hundred percent. The argument about education getting in the way of innovation is ridiculous to the extreme. When I see a novice making wild claims about a perfectly normal behavior of a circuit or device I am reminded of someone that wants to explore new worlds. They refuse to take the time to learn what worlds have been explored so everything new to them must be a new discovery. They are so simple in their thinking they refuse to even learn how to read a map to help them explore for new worlds. I have had many discussions on this and other forums with people that don't even know how to properly use the meters and other test equipment they have but they are still sure they have made some great discoveries. Thanks for your clear and accurate post.

All of this sounds very condescending, but I don't mean it to be. None of us were born knowing all about electronics or anything else for that matter, but a lot of us have taken the time to actually try and learn. And those that refuse to learn make such silly arguments for not taking the time to learn that I just have to comment on it sometimes.

Respectfully,Carroll

PS: F6FLT sounds like an amateur radio operator's call. Are you a ham? My call is WD4SIX