Yeah, if you think I'm talking about David Copperfield then you're in the wrong conversation.

You say that science will, but can you explain how? I, however, can explain why it will not. Because magic is inherently non-empirical. Science cannot make any comment on the non-empirical. Case closed.

Hey, bio.

Thanks for the explanation. It was very clear and very informative.

"Residue" seems a little spurious to me. What does that actually mean?

For real, that femto-photography stuff is mad crazy awesome. But there's an issue. It is a new technology that is better at doing the exact same thing that every single scientific experiment, calculation and piece of equipment has done since the dawn of science; observe the empirical. So I have no doubt that we'll have better technology and better gadgets in the future. But it's not a question of better. It's a question of limitation. No scientific experiment, calculation or piece of equipment has ever made a single statement about the non-empirical. Because it cannot. Not ever.

Hey, Phaedrus.

I'll have you know, good sir, that I have had sex with several very attractive oscilloscopes... wait... that really should have stayed a secret... yikes...