6 comments:

The feds won't do all the low-end stuff they do under the state statute, 4:47. It'll stop folks from going after truly little fish, IMO, and I bet the average forfeiture amount goes up a lot if it's only the feds doing it.

That said, as I understand it, Burton's bill would also apply to seeking federal forfeitures. But I agree the other bills need to be tweaked to apply to federal forfeitures, too, where possible - e.g., Huffines' bill giving all the money to crime victims, and the reporting bills. Jennifer Laurin made the same point today in a comment to a different post.

This has always been totally crazy. We live in a land where the rule of law, the federal and state constitutions, lay the foundation. Allowing the police to steal people's assets is so totally outside the rule of law I wonder where the courts put their spine. There NO LEGAL JUSTIFICATION for pre-conviction forfeiture. But we don't live in a police state, do we?

This is another example of the double standard of law enforcement and prosecutors. Please reflect on "pretext stops" where the police use probable cause of a misdemeanor for legal justification for a stop or search where there is no probable cause for the targeted felony.

Very proud of Scott. Please keep pushing you are making a real difference.

Asset forfeiture violates the united States of America constitution fifth Amendment of Due process of Law. It violates the Texas constitution Article 1, Sec. 19. It should be void on its face. It is also a Bill of Attainder in that it is a taking of your life. Yes it is your life if you can't pay bills, buy food, pay for rent or utilities or even unable to get to work because the cops stole your car at gun point. Or you can call it a bill of Pains & Penalties. Most of these thefts by cops are done without ever charging the victims. In north Texas I read a police chief statement he needed the asset forfeiture for his budget. He built his budget with the intention of "stealing" from victims in order to fulfill his budget wants. How can you know that people have drug money when you stop them other than you just steal their property under color of law.

The law is there for due process. Cops need to be criminally charged for stealing property with out charging the individual with any crime and without a court order after being found guilty in a trial.

Also, cops should get prison time if the only purpose was take the individuals property for their use and not because of a true criminal act. Remember the couple outside Houston that were threaten to have their children taken by CPS if they did not hand over their "savings" that they had to buy a car. They had broken no law that allowed the cops to rob them.

Then if you really under stand law, then you would know that Congress cannot legislate to the people it is not their jurisdiction. We don't live in a federal zone, but that gets into a whole another discussion. The cops have no authority to enforce a federal law.

Texas is still trying to collect about four billion dollars in overdue child support and confiscation seems to be a partial solution. Note that the folks in border town are getting smarter however----scofflaws are getting driver licenses and vehicle registrations, tags, from places like Juarez and many are putting their expensive pickups and cars in the name of dad, mom, uncle or brother so as to beat the name check a police computer might do on them one day.

GfB Writer Bios

Subscribe by email

Support Grits via Donation

Donate to Grits via PayPal. Grits is a hobby, but donations help cover newspaper subscriptions, periodic travel, open records fees, etc.. Donate if you can! When I have resources, the blog can do more stuff!

"I always tell people interested in these issues that your blog is the most important news source, and have had high-ranking corrections officials tell me they read it regularly."

- Scott Medlock, Texas Civil Rights Project

"a helluva blog"

- Solomon Moore, NY Times criminal justice correspondent

"Congrats on building one of the most read and important blogs on a specific policy area that I've ever seen"

- Donald Lee, Texas Conference of Urban Counties

GFB "is a fact-packed, trustworthy reporter of the weirdness that makes up corrections and criminal law in the Lone Star State" and has "shown more naked emperors than Hans Christian Andersen ever did."

-Attorney Bob Mabry, Conroe

"Grits really shows the potential of a single-state focused criminal law blog"

- Corey Yung, Sex Crimes Blog

"I regard Grits for Breakfast as one of the most welcome and helpful vehicles we elected officials have for understanding the problems and their solutions."

Tommy Adkisson,Bexar County Commissioner

"dude really has a pragmatic approach to crime fighting, almost like he’s some kind of statistics superhero"

- Rob Patterson, The Austin Post"Scott Henson's 'Grits for Breakfast' is one of the most insightful blogs on criminal justice issues in Texas."

- Texas Public Policy Foundation

"Nobody does it better or works harder getting it right"

David Jennings, aka "Big Jolly"

"I appreciate the fact that you obviously try to see both sides of an issue, regardless of which side you end up supporting."

Kim Vickers,Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and EducationGrits for Breakfast "has probably broken more criminal justice stories than any TX reporter, but stays under the radar. Fascinating guy."

Maurice Chammah,The Marshall Project"unrestrained and uneducated"

John Bradley,Former Williamson County District Attorney, now former Attorney General of Palau

"our favorite blog"

- Texas District and County Attorneys Association Twitter feed"Scott Henson ... writes his terrific blog Grits for Breakfast from an outhouse in Texas."