Editor’s
Note: This month marks the Centenary of Pope St. Pius X’s Encyclical
Against Modernism, Pascendi, issued on September 8, 1907. Presented here
is a letter of Cardinal Mercier, then-primate of Belgium, on the subject
of Modernism. The Letter is of dogmatic and historical interest as it was
written at the time of Pascendi’s
release. The Cardinal congratulates the Church in Belgium at the time for
not succumbing to Modernist errors. Would that this could be said of the
Church in Belgium today.

THE ENCYCLICAL.

DEARLY BELOVED BRETHREN,

On July 3rd, 1907, the Holy Father prepared a list of errors which,
later, were grouped together under the name of Modernism, and condemned.

On the 8th of September following he addressed to the Catholic
world an Encyclical of incomparable fulness, vigour, and clearness, in
which he sets forth his reasons for condemning Modernism. Thank God! these
errors, which have so far invaded France and Italy, attract few followers
in Belgium. You have been preserved by the vigilance of your pastors, by
an impartial scientific spirit, and by the Christian submission that
animates the representatives of higher learning in your country.

Nevertheless, beloved brethren, I consider it a pastoral duty to
bring to your knowledge this Pontifical Encyclical, which henceforth will
be known in ecclesiastical history by its introductory Latin words: "Pascendi
Domini gregis", or, more briefly, "Pascendi."

Since the Holy Father addresses his letter to each Church in
particular, that is, to the Bishops, priests, and Catholic laity, it is
his intention that each one should individually profit by the Encyclical.
The importance of this document, moreover, gives it an historic value:
hence, those who are interested in our Mother, the Church, should know, at
least in substance, its meaning. It is a well-known fact that scarcely had
the Pope spoken, or rather before he had spoken, and from the moment that
the telegraphic agents heralded his coming announcement, the unbelieving
press began to misrepresent it, and the newspapers and reviews hostile to
the Church in our country neither published the text nor the general
tenour of the Encyclical with fulness or frankness. But with an eagerness
and a harmony of opinion that altogether explain their attitude, they
quibbled over the word Modernism in the endeavour to convince their
confiding readers that the Pope condemns modern thought, which in their
ambiguous language signifies modern science and its methods.

This offensive and false impression of the Pope and his faithful
followers has perhaps been shared by some amongst you, hence it is our
earnest wish to remove this impression by explaining Modernism, and, in so
doing, enlighten you as to the reasons that led to its condemnation by the
Supreme Authority of the Church.

WHAT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEA OF MODERNISM?

Modernism is not the modern expression of science, and consequently
its condemnation is not the condemnation of science, of which we are so
justly proud, nor the disapproval of its methods, which all Catholic
scientists hold, and consider it an honour to teach and to practice.

Modernism consists essentially in affirming that the religious soul
must draw from itself, from nothing but itself, the object and motive of
its faith. It rejects all revelation imposed upon the conscience, and
thus, as a necessary consequence, becomes the negation of the doctrinal
authority of the Church established by Jesus Christ, and it denies,
moreover, to the divinely constituted hierarchy the right to govern
Christian society.

The better to understand the significance of this fundamental
error, let us recall the teaching of the Catechism on the constitution and
mission of the Catholic Church.

Christ did not represent Himself to the world as the head of a
philosophy and uncertain of His teaching! He did not leave a modifiable
system of opinions to the discussion of His disciples. On the contrary,
strong in His divine wisdom and sovereign power, He pronounced, and
imposed upon men the revealed word that assures eternal salvation, and
indicated to them the unique way to attain it. He promulgated for them a
code of morals, giving them certain helps without which it is impossible
to put these precepts into practice. Grace, and the Sacraments which
confer it upon us, or restore it to us, when, having sinned, we again find
it through repentance, form together these helps, this economy of
salvation. He instituted a Church, and as He had only a few years to dwell
with us upon earth, He conferred His power upon His Apostles, and after
them on their successors, the Pontiffs and Bishops. The Episcopate, in
union with the Sovereign Pontiff, has then received and alone posesses the
right to officially set forth and comment upon the doctrines revealed by
Christ: and it and he alone are empowered to denounce with authority
errors that are incompatible with its teachings. The Christian is he who
confides in the authority of the Church and sincerely accepts the
doctrines that she proposes to his faith. He who repudiates or questions
her authority, and in consequence rejects one or more of the truths he is
required to believe, excludes himself from the ecclesiastical fold.

THE CHURCH AND THE MODERNISTS.

The excommunication pronounced by the Pope against wilful
Modernists, which adversaries characterise as an act of despotism, is
simple and natural, and in it we see only a question of loyalty.

Yes or no, do you believe in the divine authority of the Church? Do
you accept outwardly and in the sincerity of your heart what in the name
of Christ she commands? Do you consent to obey her? If so, she offers you
her Sacraments, and undertakes to conduct you safely into the harbour of
salvation. If not, then you deliberately sever the tie that unites you to
her, and break the bond consecrated by her grace. Before God and your
conscience you no longer belong to her: no longer remain in obstinate
hyprocrisy a pretended member of her fold. You cannot honestly pass
yourself off as one of her sons, and as she cannot be a party to hypocrisy
and sacrilege, she bids you, if you force her to it, to leave her ranks.

Of course she only repudiates you so long as you wish it yourself.
The day you deplore having strayed from the fold, and return to recognise
loyally her authority, she receives you with clemency, and treats you in
the same way as the father of the prodigal son, who welcomed with
tenderness his repentant child.

Such, then, is the constitution of the Church.

The Catholic Episcopate, of which the Pope is the head, is the heir
of the apostolic college that teaches the Faithful the authentic Christian
revelation.

And as the life of the entire organism is centred in the head,
which directs its actions and arranges with order all its movements, so
the Pope assures unity to the teaching Church; and each time that one of
the Faithful, even a Bishop, proclaims contrary doctrine, the Holy Father
decides with Supreme Authority, and from that authority there is no
appeal.

In fine, the entire question resolves itself into this: whenever a
Christian is in doubt, he asks himself these two questions -- What must I
believe now? And why must I believe it?

The reply is this: I believe the teaching of the Catholic Bishops
who are in accord with the Pope, and I am forced to believe it, because
the Episcopate in union with the Pope is the organ that transmits to the
Faithful the revealed teaching of Jesus Christ. Let me say in passing that
this organ of transmission is no other than tradition, which the believing
Christian must loyally accept and follow. Hence the Modernism condemned by
the Pope is the negation of the Church's teaching, a simple truth you
learnt as a child when preparing for your First Communion.

THE AFFINITY OF MODERNISM WITH PROTESTANTISM.

The generating ideas of the Modernist doctrine first saw light in
Protestant Germany. These ideas, however, became forthwith acclimatized in
England, and several off-shoots have penetrated into the United States.

The spirit of Modernism has appeared in Catholic countries, where
it manifests itself in the writings of certain authors who are forgetful
of the traditions of the Church, and have shocked by the enormity of their
errors loyal consciences faithful to their baptismal vows. This spirit has
breathed over France, Italy has felt its blight, and some Catholics in
England and Germany have suffered the infection. Belgium, happily, is one
of the Catholic countries that has most successfully resisted its
pernicious influence.

You understand, we make a difference between Modernist doctrines
and the spirit that animates them. The doctrines disseminated in the
philosophical, theological, exegetic and apologetic writings have been
admirably systematized in the Encyclical Pascendi; and since it has been
your privilege to escape their influence, it is hardly necessary to prove
to you how completely these teachings are at variance with faith and sound
philosophy.

But I dread even more for your souls the contagion of this spirit
of Modernism, which is the outcome of Protestantism.

You know in what Protestantism consists. Luther questioned the
right of the Church to teach the Christian world the revelations of Jesus
Christ with authority. The Christian, he contends, is self-sufficient in
his beliefs; he infers the elements of his faith from the Sacred
Scriptures, which each man interprets directly under the inspiration of
the Holy Ghost. He does not admit the existence in the Church of a
hierarchically-constituted authority which transmits faithfully to the
world the revealed teaching, or that it has the right to interpret, or to
claim to guard this teaching in its integrity.

This is the essential point in dispute between Catholicism and
Protestantism. The Catholic contends that the faith of the Christian is
communicated to the Faithful by an official organ of transmission: the
Catholic Episcopate, and that faith is based on the acceptance of the
authority of this organ. The Protestant says, on the contrary, that it is
exclusively an affair of individual judgment based on the interpretation
of the Bible. A Protestant Church is necessarily invisible, since it
depends on the assumed agreement of individual consciences as to the
meaning of Holy Scripture. Protestantism thus formulated was condemned by
the Council of Trent in the sixteenth century, and the man does not exist
who would dare to call himself a Protestant and think himself at the same
time a Catholic.

But the spirit of Protestantism crept here and there into Catholic
centres, and gave birth to conceptions wherein we find a mixture of
sincere piety -- the religious instincts of a Catholic soul and the
intellectual errors of Protestantism.

Frederick Paulsen, Professor at the Rational Protestant University
at Berlin, speaking of the Encyclical Pascendi admits this strange fact.
"It seems," he says, "that all the doctrines condemned by
the Encyclical are of German origin, and yet there is hardly one
theologian in Germany who defends Modernism in his own faculty of
Theology."

This is most significant. But traces of the spirit of Protestantism
in German University centres date further back than to-day.

When Pius IX called a General Council in 1869, a learned and
well-known Catholic Professor at the University in Munich, Döllinger, who
later openly fell away, writing ŕ propos of the rôle of Bishops in these
Councils, says: "The Bishops must be present at the Council to bear
witness to the faith of their respective dioceses; and the definitions
that result from the Council must be the expression of collective
beliefs."

Here you have, beloved brethren, the accord of the individual
conscience substituted for the direction of authority.

THE SPIRIT OF MODERNISM IN F. TYRRELL'S WRITINGS.

The most intelligent observer of the contemporary Modernist
movement and the most expressive of its tendency, he who has seized its
true significance and who is perhaps the most profoundly imbued with its
spirit, is the English priest, Father Tyrrell.

In the numerous writings published by him in the last ten years
there is much that is edifying, much for which we are deeply grateful to
the author: but often in the spirit which animates these same pages there
is the fundamental error of Döllinger, the real principle of
Protestantism.

This, however, is not surprising, inasmuch as Father Tyrrell is a
convert, and was educated under Protestant influences.

Tyrrell, who was intent only on the interior workings of the
conscience, neglectful of dogmatic traditions and ecclesiastical history,
zealous above all to hold in the bosom of the Church those of our own
contemporaries whom the blustering assertions of unbelievers disconcert
(those unbelievers who, sometimes in the name of natural science,
sometimes in the name of historical criticism, endeavour to impose
philosophic prejudices and hypercritical conjectures as conclusions drawn
from science in conflict with our Faith), has, after the lapse of forty
years, renewed an attack analogous to that of the apostate Döllinger.

Revelation, he says, is not a doctrinal deposit confided to the
guardianship of the teaching Church of which the Faithful will receive the
authentic interpretations at various times when an authoritative
announcement is required; it is the collective life of religious souls,
or, rather, of every person of good will who aspires to an ideal above the
material ambitions of the egotist. The Saints of Christianity are the élite
of this invisible society, this communion of Saints. While the Religious
life follows unswervingly its course in the depths of the Christian
conscience, "theological" beliefs work themselves out in the
intelligence, express themselves in formulae commanded by the needs of the
moment, but less conformed to the living reality of faith according as
they are dogmatically defined. The authority of the Roman Catholic Church
interprets the interior life of the Faithful, recapitulates the product of
the universal conscience, and announces it in the form of a dogma. But the
true inner religious life remains the supreme guide in matters of faith
and dogma.

Moreover, the force of the intelligence being subject to a thousand
fluctuations, the code of belief varies; the dogmas of the Church in turn
change their sense, if not necessarily their expression, according to the
successive generations to whom she speaks. Nevertheless the Catholic
Church remains one, and is faithful to its Founder; for since the time of
Christ the same spirit of religion and holiness animates the successive
generations of the Christian world, and all meet on the common ground,
which in the main is the sentiment of filial piety to Our Father in
heaven, love for humanity, and a universal brotherhood.

CAUSES THAT FAVOURED THE GROWTH OF MODERNISM.

Such, beloved brethren, is the soul of Modernism.

The leading idea of the system has been greatly influenced by the
philosophy of Kant; a Protestant himself and author of a special theory in
which the universal certitude of science is opposed to the exclusively
personal certitude of religious sentiment. It has been without doubt this
infatuation, as general as it is ill-considered, that attracts so many
superior minds to apply arbitrarily and a priori to history, and
especially to the history of the Holy Scriptures and our dogmatic beliefs,
an hypothesis -- the hypothesis of evolution -- which, far from being a
general law in the domain of human reasoning, has not been even proved in
the limited field of the formation of animal and vegetable species. This
idea in itself, which in the beginning inspired many generous champions of
the Catholic apologetic school, and which later on plunged them into
Modernism, is none other at bottom than Protestant individualism, which
substitutes itself for the Catholic conception of a teaching authority
established by Jesus Christ, and charged with the mission of informing us
what we are obliged to believe under pain of eternal damnation.

This spirit is everywhere in the atmosphere, and for this reason,
no doubt, the Pope, specially guided by Divine Providence, addresses to
the whole world an Encyclical, the doctrinal tenor of which concerns, it
seems, but a fraction of the Catholics of France, England, and Italy.

The doctrines condemned by the Encyclical horrified faithful
Christians by their mere announcement. But in the tendencies of Modernism
there must be something seductive which seems to attract even honest
minds, true to the faith of their baptism. Whence comes, and in what
consists the charm that renders Modernism so attractive to youth? We see
two principal causes, and these are the two errors I hope to dissipate in
the second part of my pastoral letter.

PRETENDED ANTAGONISM BETWEEN PROGRESS AND THE CHURCH.

The unbelieving Press loudly proclaims that the Pope, in condemning
Modernism, puts himself in opposition to progress, and denies to Catholics
the right to advance with the age. Deceived by this falsehood, which
certain Catholics have imprudently believed, many right-minded and honest
souls, until now faithful to the Church, waver, become discouraged, and
imagine without reason that they cannot obey their Christian consciences
and at the same time serve the cause of scientific progress.

It seems clearly my duty to reply to these calumnious accusations
of a hostile press in an announcement addressed specially to the clergy,
extracts from which they can make use of at their own discretion for the
benefit of the Faithful. It is imperative, however, to convince men of
good will in Belgium that, in being with the Pope against Modernism, they
are not less with the times in promoting progress and in honouring
Science.

Thanks be to God, the Belgian Catholics have escaped these
Modernist heresies. The representatives of philosophical and theological
teaching in our University, those in our free branches of studies, and
those also in the Seminaries and Religious Congregations, have unanimously
and spontaneously given weight to this declaration in a document signed by
each one of them, in which they state that the Pope, by his courageous
Encyclical, has saved the Faith and protected Science.

And these same signatories, have they not the right to proudly face
their accusers, in the name of the Catholic institutions they represent,
and to demand of them: What, then, is the science that we have not served,
and that we will not serve, as well, if not better, than you? Do our
Professors fear to be compared with yours? The pupils we educate, pitted
by public competition against yours, do they not always carry off the
honours?

The strength of conviction and the sincerity of love is tested by
sacrifice. You know, perhaps, the liberality of the unbeliever in behalf
of Science. This is true, and I rejoice in the fact, but I ask you without
fear to compare it with the lavish generosity of millions of Catholic
Belgians for all branches of learning.

THE UNCONSCIOUS ASSIMILATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CHURCH WITH
MODERN POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS.

The second error -- an error which takes advantage of the spirit of
Modernism to infect the youth of our day, and sometimes also to draw away
the masses -- is the unconscious confusion of the constitution of the
Catholic Church with the political organizations of modern society.

Under the Parliamentary system, each citizen is supposed to have a
voice in the direction of public affairs: the revolutionary theories
circulated by Rousseau, and adopted in the declaration of the Rights of
Man in 1789, have disseminated in the masses a mistaken idea that the
directing authority of the country is made up of the collective individual
wills of the people; the representatives of power are thus considered
delegates, whose exclusive rôle it is to interpret and turn to account
the opinions and will of their constituents.

It is this conception of power that Döllinger wished to apply to
the Bishops assembled in the Vatican Council. Later on, Father Tyrrell
applied it to the Bishops as well as the faithful ecclesiastics or laics
of the Christian community, reserving only to the Bishops and even to the
supreme authority of the Pope the right to put on record and to proclaim
authentically what the dispersed members of the Christian family, nay,
even what religious communities have thought, loved, and felt.

This analogy is false: civil society, following a natural law, is
born of the union and co-operation of the wills of the members that
compose it. But the supernatural society of the Church is essentially
positive and external, and must be accepted by its members as it was
organized by its divine Founder, and to Christ alone belongs the right to
dictate to us His will.

Listen to the Son of God, made Man, giving His Apostles His
sovereign and indefeasible instructions: "Go into the whole world and
preach the Gospel to every creature." "He that believeth, and,
is baptised, shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be
condemned." The Evangelist St. Mark, who quotes these words in the
last page of his Gospel, concludes as follows: "And the Lord Jesus,
after He had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven, and sitteth at the
right hand of God. But they going forth preached everywhere; the Lord
working withal, and confirming the word with signs that followed."
Hence the Bishops continue the apostolic mission, and the Faithful must
listen, believe, and obey their teaching under pain of eternal damnation.
"If he will not hear the Church," says our Lord, "let him
be to thee as the heathen and the publican," that is like unto a man
without faith. "Amen, I say to you, whatsoever you shall bind upon
earth shall be bound also in heaven, and whatsoever you shall loose upon
earth shall be loosed in heaven."

THE CHRISTIAN MUST PROTECT HIS FAITH BY ENLIGHTENMENT.

Hold fast, dear Christians, to the cornerstone of your faith.
Confide in your Bishop, who himself is supported by the Successor of
Peter, the Bishop of Bishops, the immediate representative of the Son of
God, our Saviour Jesus Christ. Protect with vigilance the treasure of your
faith, without which nothing will profit you for eternity.

Perfect your religious instruction.

It is an astonishing fact that in proportion as the youth grows to
manhood, he considers it almost a question of honour to develop his
physical forces, to increase the measure of his knowledge, to strengthen
his judgment, enrich his experience, to polish his language and refine his
style, and better inform himself on the march of events. Man has at heart
the perfection of his profession, and is there a lawyer, magistrate,
doctor, or merchant who would not blush if forced to admit at forty that
for the last twenty years he had added nothing to his store of knowledge?

And is it not a fact that if Catholics of twenty, thirty and forty
years of age were interrogated, they would have to confess that since
their First Communion they had not studied their religion, and perhaps
have even now forgotten what they then learned?

In these troubled times I understand the conquests of unbelief, and
I deplore them; but what seems more difficult to explain is that a
believing, intelligent man, conscious of the value of that rare gift of
Faith, is content to ignore what he believes, why he believes it, and what
the solemn vows of baptism pledged him to, towards God and his neighbour.

Every well educated man should have in his library a Catechism, if
not to learn by heart, at least to study the text. The one most highly
recommended is the Catechism of the Council of Trent, an admirable work in
its clearness, precision and method, in which by the order of the Fathers
of the Council of Trent, a commission of distinguished theologians was
charged to condense the substance of faith and morals and the institutions
of Christianity.

To instruct himself in the reasons for his belief the well-informed
Catholic should have, beside his Catechism, a manual of the dogmatic
teachings of the Church, and the principal Pontifical Encyclicals
addressed to our generation, those of Leo XIII, of glorious memory, and
the Encyclicals of Pius X.

All Catholics should have in their households, if not the integral
text of the Bible, at least the New Testament, that is, the four Gospels
and the Acts of the Apostles. And they should have, moreover, a history of
the Church and an apologetical treatise.

But to keep alive and nourish his piety every Christian should
possess a Roman Missal, and a treatise on the liturgy that will explain
the ceremonies of the Mass and the principal manifestations of religious
worship in the Church.

The Imitation of Christ, Bossuet's Meditations on the Gospels, and
The Introduction to a Devout Life, by St. Francis of Sales, and, in
addition to these, several lives of the Saints that represent to us the
practical application of the teaching of the Gospel: these books form
together at a very modest outlay the minimum religious library of a
Christian family. Every family, however humble, ought to have several
books of piety.

I have sometimes glanced at the libraries of friends following
liberal careers, and noticed books of science, of literature, and profane
history; but how often one searches in vain for any religious literature.
Is it then surprising that minds so poorly equipped are easily taken in by
an audaciously formulated objection: they are then horrified, and appeal
to apologetics for help.

Apologetics have without doubt their place in the Church, and
oppose a defence to every attack. When one is ill the physician is called
in, but hygiene is more potent than the doctor. Study for choice the
statements and proofs of Catholic doctrine, penetrate yourself with its
teachings and meditate on them, get to know the history of the Church, and
learn her apostolic labours.

EXHORTATION TO PRAYER AND VIGILANCE.

Watch and pray! By the integrity of your life, by the purity of
your morals, and by the humble confession of your dependence on God and
your need of His merciful Providence, banish the interested motives for
unbelief, and then will disappear, as mists before the sun, the doubts
that rise in the soul and obscure the horizon. And if at times on some
special point a doubt should trouble your conscience, have recourse to
some enlightened man: the explanation he will give you will be adapted to
your mentality and to your peculiar state of soul at that moment; and will
be more efficacious than replies indiscriminately addressed to a large
crowd of listeners or readers.

None of us, dearly beloved brethren, sufficiently appreciates the
gift of Faith. Man is so made that he takes no account of what has
definitely become part of his constitution. You have sight, hearing, good
lungs, and a sound heart; and do you often thank God for these blessings?
Ah! if you were menaced with blindness, loss of hearing, tuberculosis or
paralysis, how much greater would be your appreciation of the blessings
that you seem on the point of losing, and how spontaneous would be your
gratitude when you had recovered your sense of security.

The Protestant nations are sick, and for four centuries the leaven
of free interpretation has been working in them: observe with what painful
anxiety religious souls are being torn asunder by the thousand and one
sects between whose conflicting claims they cannot come to a decision.

And it is just when devout Protestants are attacked by liberalism
and tossed about by doubts, and appeal in despair to authority for help,
crying: "Save us, O Lord, or we perish!" that the Modernists
would do away with the Chief who makes us the envy of our separated
brethren, and invite us to renew an experiment that four lamentable
centuries proclaim a failure.

No, beloved brethren, we will have nothing to do with such a
painful experiment. More closely than ever will we hold to the Vicar of
Christ.

"I have a great mystery to preach to you," said Bossuet;
"the mystery of the unity of the Church." United within by the
Holy Spirit, she has still a common tie in her exterior Communion, and
must remain united by a government wherein the authority of Christ is
represented. This union guards unity, and under the seal of ecclesiastical
government unity of mind is preserved.

The unity of Christian Faith is safe only in the Catholic Church,
and the Catholic Church is only stable on the Chair of Peter.

"We
will turn then," said St. Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons, at the end of
the second century, "to the most ancient of the Churches, known to
all as the Church founded and constituted at Rome by the two glorious
Apostles, Peter and Paul: we will prove that the traditions held by the
Apostles, and the Faith they announced to men, have come to us by the
regular succession of Bishops: and it will be a subject of confusion for
all those who, either from vanity, blindness or bad feeling, take in
without discrimination all sorts of opinions that may happen to appeal to
them; for such is the superiority of the pre-eminence of the Church of
Rome, that all the Churches, that is to say, the Faithful the world over,
must be in accord with her, and the Faithful, wherever they may come from,
will find intact in her the traditions of the Apostles."

From
the September 2007 issue ofCatholic Family News,Niagara Falls, NY