I have long been very pessimistic of Japanese mobile strategy since I did not see how it could translate outside of Japan.

However, this is great news for Japan, the industry and the ecosystem

Japan’s four leading mobile phone makers are teaming up with NTT DoCoMo Inc.to develop the operating system for DoCoMo’s next-generation mobile phones, due to be released next year, the Nikkei reported Sunday. The new operating system will, in principle, be used in all of DoCoMo’s next-generation handsets. It will be optimized for video and music use. The six partners will also market the software overseas, hoping to take away market share from Apple Inc.’s iPhone.

The ‘market the software overseas’ bit could be very interesting indeed ..

Let’s see what that could mean

Software platforms are open sourced in most cases. Where they were not( ex – windows mobile), the strategy seems to be now leaning to launch a device + platform as in case of windows. So, it is an acknowledgement that value has shifted away from the platform.

Like the game of musical chairs, the players are aligning themselves very clearly with some unique advantages. The last one standing may be at risk!

a) Symbian has Nokia and Ovi. That’s always its strength

b) Android has Google who continues to invest and contribute. It also has a great developer ecosystem which will be an asset to any Operator

c) BONDI has tied up with WAC

d) MSFT has launched devices

That leaves LiMo in the game of musical chairs.

Why is LiMo vulnerable?

No clear developer program to date, Not clear about APIs still(how they can be accessed), Not clear who will contribute(Samsung etc have launched BADA) are three reasons

I like the Japanese announcement for a number of reasons – ex if the Japanese experience in content, codecs, LTE etc can be encapsulated in the form of a great platform, that’s VERY good for the industry. Japan also has a history of building an ecosystem(with DoCoMo).

This platform could thus challenge even Android(in due course as devices are deployed) but in the immediate term could directly impact LiMo

The debacle of Palm teaches us that the rate of change has increased dramatically and as we see today, once again the game of musical chairs shifts again

a) Why are mobile phones banned on planes even when they are on the ground? Apparently, the reason is – the equipment on planes has not been tested against mobile radiation i.e. in the strictest sense every component on a plane needs to be tested for impact of radiation from phones(which is not practical to do especially for older planes). Now, consider volcanic ash – a far more disruptive element especially considering the nature of the eruption.

Hence, caution is justified. And yet, there are calls to say that the airspace should have been opened up sooner mainly from people who have a commercial interest with potentially little understanding of the science behind it

“For an industry that lost $9.4bn last year and was forecast to lose a further $2.8bn in 2010, this crisis is devastating,” IATA chief Giovanni Bisignani said. “Airspace was being closed based on theoretical models, not on facts.”

I would be interested to know what ‘facts’ IATA chief Giovanni Bisignani had about the impact of large scale volcanic eruptions on air traffic.

Meanwhile, the above image IS a fact! I will think of it on my next flight! So should you!

And here is an illustruation of the 747 in 1982 losing all four engines due to volcanic ash(the ‘fire’ around the plane is St Elmo’s fire effect)

Since twitter business models are in the air and being discussed at the Chirp conference, .. here is a proposed model ..

If I send a direct message tweet starting with ‘S ‘ (s space’), then I want that tweet to be converted to an SMS to the person being sent the message to.

This has some interesting implications and value for customers since it converts the urgent tweet to SMS

secondly(and independently)

I was thinking that how would we get @twittername into HTML itself ie in twitter if I put @AjitJaokar then it translates to www.twitter.com/AjitJaokar but to make this as a part of generic web – how would that go about?

I am aware of the non-open nature of Twitter etc, but still the question bears thinking about since Twitter has become so pervasive

Nick Clegg was the only person who talked about working across parties to solve some of society’s big problems. This is the kind of mature grown up politics we need to deal with our current problems. It is time to end this 2 party state. This isn’t a country that has to be either run by Labour or Tory. There is another way, and I and many other voters would like to see an electoral system that recognises the share of votes in this country once and for all.

Nick Clegg was the only person who talked about working across parties to solve some of society’s big problems.

I was discussing the future of government with Don and others at the last WEF meeting I attended and Don does a lot of cutting edge work in this space. One of the insights for collaboration I gained from wikinomics is: Collaboration is becoming pervasive. By extension, it is a key part of government going forward. Hence, the ability (and willingness) displayed by Nick Clegg in working with others across the party spectrum may be an asset rather than a liability

Indeed, the ability to collaborate may be a requirement for politicians going forward ..

But even the city may need to adjust its thinking more to a new way of grassroots driven political landscape which we saw first in the USA and we may well see here in the form of a government based on collaboration.

This should not surprise us. It is, after all, an impact of the Internet. Media fragments. So do votes.

This means we are likely to see cross party issue based collaboration and that’s good. Currently, only Nick Clegg seems to have sensed that.

PS: I admit I did not watch the entire debate, because it clashed with other important programs