"OMG, our beloved Emperor is gone! (sorta') But don't worry: the Democrats are fanning the flames of crazy, so it's just a matter of time before they run things again."

Tuesday, December 15

Hillary denies telling families of Benghazi dead that attack was due to a video

Remember that unpleasantness in Benghazi, Libya way waaay back in
2012? Hard to remember much about something that happened so, so long ago, eh? Something about four Americans killed? An ambassador or something?

I mean really, who in the world bothers remembering trivial stuff like that?

But even if you don't recall much about it, I'll bet you remember what your emperor and SecState Hillary Clinton said caused the attack. Sure: They blamed it on a video, posted on YouTube, that was critical Mohammed or Islam or some such.

Obama ordered U.N. ambassador Susan Rice to go to all the Sunday talk shows to push this fable.

Hell, they even threw the guy who made the vid in jail.

Freedom of speech? Nah, we don't believe in that stuff here, comrade. That be dangerous talk.

When
plane carrying the families of the four dead Americans landed in the
U.S., Hillary met them at the airport and told 'em that the reason their
sons or husbands were murdered was the anti-Muzz video.

With that as background, the presumptive Democrat nominee for president--Hillary--appeared on ABC News' This Week
Sunday, where host (and super-Clinton fan) George Stephanopoulos asked
her if she'd told family members of the four murdered Americans that a
YouTube video was responsible
for their loved ones' deaths. Here's the exchange:

STEPHANOPOULOS:Did you tell them it was about the film? And what's your response?

HILLARY CLINTON:No. You
know, look I understand the continuing grief at the loss that parents
experienced with the loss of these four brave Americans. And I did
testify, as you know, for 11 hours. And I answered all of these
questions.

Now, I can't -- I can't help it if the people think there has to
be something else there. I said very clearly there had been a terrorist
group, uh, that had taken responsibility on Facebook, um, between the
time that, uh, I – you know, when I talked to my daughter, that was the
latest information; we were, uh, giving it credibility. And then we
learned the next day it wasn’t true. In fact, they retracted it. This
was a fast-moving series of events in the fog of war and I think most
Americans understand that.

Why is Clinton's answer to this question important? Because we now know--thanks
to emails that should have been on a government server but which
Clinton tried to hide on the private server she illegally used for
government business, and which were pried out of her hands by a
lawsuit--that within hours of the attacks
Clinton was informed that the attack was NOT caused by a spontaneous
reaction to a video, but was a carefully planned terrorist attack.

Yet in remarks on video the next day Clinton blamed the attacks on the video on YouTube. Several family members of the murdered American have publicly claimed that she blamed the video
in meetings with them three days later.

So Hillary
and Obama both knew the true cause, but for several days pushed the
bullshit cover story that the attacks were caused by this allegedly
defamatory video.

Now consider that on the ABC show last Sunday Hillary denied
telling the families that the attacks were caused by the video. Why?
Because now her own emails have now proven that she knew that story was
false. Rather than claiming the emails were false, she's trying to deny
that she supported Obama's bullshit cover story.

And
yet a majority of Democrats still want this woman to be president.
Obviously her brazen lying doesn't bother them a bit. Or maybe they're
just unaware of it.

After all, it happened so long ago. 2012, if I recall. Just two months before the presidential election.

Oooh,
surely you don't think Obama would have ordered his lackeys to go with
the bullshit story so voters would be able to "explain away" the attacks
as resulting from a grave and altogether understandable provocation of
those innocent, peace-loving Muzz, do ya?

And Hill went along. But now she's denying she ever supported the cover story.

0 Comments:

About Me

Ex-AF pilot. While airliners are very safe, flying a single-pilot jet can be extremely demanding, especially in bad weather. It's a *huge* tribute to engineers that today's commercial jetliners are so amazingly safe!