The GOP is, at this point, eating it's own candidates alive (always the threat is a primary) and so far the MOST consistently popular candidate is
Mitt Romney. (Hilariously, this could be the mirror or 2004, when a struggling Democrat party choose a certain Massachusetts Senator as its
candidate... remember what happened?)

A few things that should be clear at this point:

- The party refuses to align behind Ron Paul. That's not gonna change. Sorry guys.
- The party is very scared of Obama... one poor debate and they've started sticking the knife into Rick Perry... not because of his (insane)
policies, but because of his performance. They think he can't win. They're right.
- The Tea Party won't have a real say in the outcome of the primaries (Bachmann is toast, Perry is floundering and the businessmen are
winning...looks like we may get another CEO Presidential candidate.... just like Bush Jr.)

So, what does this all mean?

Well, look... do ANY of you think that Romney can ACTUALLY beat Obama? Really?

Originally posted by Misterlondon
how can anyone be to "blame"? i thought the majority of voters decide who wins and becomes president... surely if the blame lies with anyone its the
American public?

thats the scam of it though...

the American public doesn't decide who becomes president...

learn about electoral college before blaming the public voters

In 1824, John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson was the winner
in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams, and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson
didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to
the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House.

In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel
J. Tilden.

In 1888, Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland’s 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by
more than 90,000 votes.

In 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al
Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

Your analysis is not taking in account the three more important details:

1)What's the Illuminati-freemasonry agenda for USA, by 2012??

2)Who's the best puppet for carry up this agenda??

3)What's his/her role for the NWO??

Do you really believe that the sheeple decides a presidential election through the vote??? Democracy is an illusion. Candidates are constructed and
deconstructed according to the agenda of their overlords. TPTB are planing a complete dismantle of USA??? Turn it into a fascist nation?? Turn it into
the 4th reich?? Who fits better in each scenario?? People who believe that leaders all over the world are put in the power, independently of occult
forces and secret societies, are delusional.

Cain has a great shot, if he begins acting presidential right now. He has laid his 9-9-9 plan out for the world to see, and it has boosted his
ratings considerably. No other candidate has a clear plan, they just have talking points and ideas. Now, if Cain will follow up that plan by laying
out potential cabinet members and running mates, and a plan for Israel/Palestine, and some other clear foreign policy, then he has a shot.

Perhaps he could get some major corporations to endorse his 9-9-9 plan and publicize how it will affect their operations in the US. If it brings
money home from overseas shelters, and it encourages investment in growth in the US, then people will undoubtedly support it!

Cain has a chance to seize this momentum and continue doing what is working. That means continuing to act as if he is about to become president, and
lay out his agenda.

With Perry self-destructing, I think the Paul-Romney-Cain race will heat up and become a lot closer race. Romney and Cain have pesky Fed and
Healthcare problems. Paul is the only clear choice at this very moment, but it is anybody's game with Perry out of the picture.

Your analysis is not taking in account the three more important details:

1)What's the Illuminati-freemasonry agenda for USA, by 2012??

2)Who's the best puppet for carry up this agenda??

3)What's his/her role for the NWO??

Do you really believe that the sheeple decides a presidential election through the vote??? Democracy is an illusion. Candidates are constructed and
deconstructed according to the agenda of their overlords. TPTB are planing a complete dismantle of USA??? Turn it into a fascist nation?? Turn it into
the 4th reich?? Who fits better in each scenario?? People who believe that leaders all over the world are put in the power, independently of occult
forces and secret societies, are delusional.

edit on 9/28/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)

edit on 9/28/2011 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason
given)

This, I'm not exactly sure what the game is. I still think Perry isn't finished, they will just polish him up. War is on the agenda right now.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.