The most comprehensive source of information about Bris Milah on the Internet!
Click on any of the pages, find topics of interest through a search on the right or the Topical Index below... Best of luck to you in your research and with your baby

The article states "The case that prompted the ruling took place in Cologne, when a 4-year-old boy, circumcised by a Muslim doctor, began bleeding two days after the surgery and needed to be brought into the emergency room."

If the "Muslim doctor" is really a physician (as opposed to someone like a mohel who is often not a physician), then saying that he is Muslim is really irrelevant. This was a medical procedure and either the operator (if indeed the physician is at
fault), or the patient (who may have clotting issues), or the parents (who did
not care for the circumcision wound properly) are at fault. And this is to be
chalked up as one of the more uncommon statistics. [The doctor was apparently acquitted in the suit - it was the judges who took the case a step further to outlaw circumcision]

I am not saying circumcision is comparable with cosmetic surgery, but elective surgery often brings the desired results, and sometimes it does not. [I am also not raising the argument of whether parents "have the right" to do this to their children. There are enough voices in the medical community arguing that circumcision is either beneficial, good, or not harmful to make the pro-circumcision side a legitimate opinion.]

The article also says "The recent landmark decision will likely
draw the condemnation of Jewish and Muslim communities, although official
representatives have refrained from commenting so far, saying they first want
to study the reasons given for the judgment." Which, I guess, is reasonable.
Certainly more reasonable than the judges taking one case and deciding on national policy.

"... the district court
rule[d] that the circumcision was a “severe and irreversible interference into
physical integrity.”

Physical integrity? There are literally hundreds of millions of males in the world who are circumcised. None of them have "physical integrity?" What on earth are they talking about?

If you live in a world in which people enjoy freedoms and there is officially religious freedom, then responsible circumcision falls into the category of untouchables. As I have written in my"Bris: Not Barbaric" posting- most circumcised people do not put a
moment's thought during the day, during any given week, or much at all during
any given year to the fact that they are circumcised. There are many women in
the anti-circumcision camp, and there are men as well (circumcised and
uncircumcised) who play a role in the anti-circumcision camp. And, in general, I think they have a little too much time on their hands.

But governments and courts should
stay out of telling people what they can and cannot do. We're not talking about
the amputation of a limb. The removal of the foreskin does not change the way
the penis functions. It may remove nerve endings and alter the appearance. But
it gets rid of phimosis (which ends of helping many babies finally urinate
properly), it makes the cleaning of the penis very easy, it removes the
possibility of growing smegma, and, down the road, it significantly lowers the
incidence of certain STDs and other penile-related diseases. And, of course, a
circumcised male can enjoy intercourse and father a child just fine, all
without a foreskin.

It's not for everybody, and that's
OK. But to "ban it" as official "law of the land" on
account of one incident is uber-liberal thinking. I find it ironic that all the people who claim "God made you this way" are usually the ones who have no concept of God, religion, etc who smear religions, religious individuals, and religious choices. But when God is convenient, they use God to bolster an argument, not appreciating the rights of others to understand God the way religions have taught for centuries and millenia.

To ban circumcision otherwise in the 21st
century (which usually stems from anti-religious thinking) - this is a
200-years step backwards into the realm of feudal lords, czarist regimes, and
fanatical irrational despots who had nothing better to do than impose their own
will on the people, or make a religious life that conflicted with the despot's
view into a very very difficult undertaking.

Welcome to Mohel in South Florida

I am a mohel here to serve you, ready to tailor the ceremony to your particular needs. I will treat you with the dignity you, new parents, deserve; you are bringing your son into the mark of the Covenant - obvious to some, but not an easy decision for all.