Hi folks,
Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on July the 27th
2011. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Help
yourself to the audios which are there for free download. Thereís
hundreds to choose from. And hopefully youíll be a bit wiser, afterwards,
when you understand the world is not the way itís presented to you through your
education or via the media. Youíll understand that literally the
centuries are planned in advance and all the major wars that you see are only
parts of strategies along the way, and global warming, all this nonsense, the
carbon taxes, these are all ways to bring in a big agenda for control over
everyone across the planet. So, I try and give you the foundations that
are involved with it, the sources like the Club of Rome who came up with the idea
of global warming. They said that would fit the bill. And of
course, all the other organizations, the foundations, the bankers, who were
involved in running the future, your future, and for those who have children,
the few who do, their future as well. Help yourself to them.

And
remember too, youíre the audience that bring me to you, so you can help me by
buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And remember
from the US, you can still use a personal check to Canada, or you can send
cash, or you can send an international postal money order from your post
office, or you can use PayPal. Youíll find the button on the .com
site. Use that, and follow it with an email with name, address, and
order. Iíll get it out to you. And straight donations, believe you
me, are certainly welcome. And the dollar is still plummeting, of course,
during this soap opera, the drama, which is all dragged on really for your
benefit, not for the politicians, to make you breathe a sigh of relief when
they come up with their big new plan, and the dollar is halved in value.
And from across the world too, remember, you can still order using
PayPal. You can use Western Union or Money Gram. And once again,
straight donations are certainly welcome, because weíre on a roller
coaster.

Thatís what life is. Itís a planned roller
coaster. Nothing happens on a massive scale by accident. Thereís no
such thing as employing thousands of think tanks across the planet by all your
governments, and they didnít see something coming. Thatís
impossible. They know exactly whatís coming down the road, especially all
the manmade things, and inflation, deflation, etc, is all part of it. But
the big, big dramas that they display for the public, as I say, are for the
publicís benefit. They must train you that youíre in a massive crisis.
Itís all your fault, remember. Itís always your fault. And theyíll
have to come up with drastic measures to remedy the situations. Itís
astonishing, as you get raped and plundered, over and over and over again, with
bankers and utterly corrupt politicians.

I really
donít believe that you could be an honest politician and stay in
politics. You would get set up and removed. Thatís happened in
Canada. Some politicians have actually written books about it after they
got out, how they were set up, and how the others would try and coerce them
into taking bribes from the lobbyists, just like they were all doing. And
if you donít fit in, then, of course, they canít trust you, because youíre honest.
An honest person is therefore untrustworthy, and they have to get rid of
you. Itís a free-for-all in Congress in the US, as the politicians there
jack up their salaries with lots of lobbying fees and so on. Back with
more, after this break.

Hi folks,
weíre back, and weíre Cutting Through the Matrix. There used to be a
program or show on British television called, ďYes, MinisterĒ, and it was a
comedy, which parodied what really went on, in a sense, in Parliament, and the
bureaucracies that deal with Parliament. And in one particular episode,
they showed you the main minister, who was talking about the incredible
spending that they did just hiring ministers. And they did a survey on
it. So, he said, what did the survey say? Weíve got to do something
about all this debt. He says, well, our survey said we need a thousand
new bureaucrats. So, they kept adding bureaucrats to their staff.
And, of course, itís really jobs for the boys, because you donít realize that
bureaucrats in federal positions, and even provincial in Canada and federal in
the States, and state legislatures, and so on, they get their families all
involved. Itís really a family thing, a family affair. And itís
great work, because generally you can never get fired, and you donít do an
awful lot, and someone else always takes the blame for anything going
wrong. But, in the US, of course, we know darn well this soap opera to do
with, ďis he going to get the cash, isnít he? Will America fall?
Will it rise? Will it fall? Will it rise?Ē Itís like a gun
getting pointed at your head all the time with all the blackmail. Thereís
something more behind it, as you well know. Thereís something they want
to do, and I think this is probably what it is. It says:

Debt ceiling negotiators think
they've hit on a solution to address the debt ceiling impasse and the public's
unwillingness to let go of benefits such as Medicare and Social Security that
have been earned over a lifetime of work: Create a new Congress.

This "Super Congress," (Alan: They call it.) composed of members
of both chambers and both parties, isn't mentioned anywhere in the
Constitution, but would be granted extraordinary new powers. Under a plan put
forth by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his counterpart
Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), legislation to lift the debt ceiling would
be accompanied by the creation of a 12-member panel made up of 12 lawmakers --
six from each chamber and six from each party.

Legislation approved by the Super
Congress -- which some on Capitol Hill are calling the "super
committee" -- would then be fast-tracked through both chambers, where it
couldn't be amended by simple, regular lawmakers, who'd have the ability only
to cast an up or down vote. With the weight of both leaderships behind it, a
product originated by the Super Congress would have a strong chance of moving
through the little Congress and quickly becoming law. A Super Congress would be
less accountable than the system that exists today,

(A: Thatís what the big bankers want.)

and would find it easier to strip
the public of popular benefits. Negotiators are currently considering cutting
the mortgage deduction and tax credits for retirement savings, for instance,
extremely popular policies that would be difficult to slice up using the
traditional legislative process.

So, anyway,
Iím sure thereís something to this, and this is probably why theyíve been
dragging this out, so that the public will give a sigh of relief when they
announce some new highfalutin organization that isnít supposed to be there at
all, but theyíve just made it up, and youíll breathe a sigh of relief and say,
ďoh, good. Thank goodness the money will start flowing again.Ē And
thereís a lot more to it too, as you well know. Itís interesting, reading
down on it, Obama said America wasnít a banana republic. In other words,
he should get this extra cash that heís asking for. Really, when you look
at some of the banana republics, they donít owe any money, some of them.
And what they do owe is miniscule compared to what the US owes. And by the time
the US is finished off Ė because theyíve still got to fight the war yet with
Syria, and then Iran, thatís all part of the New American Century plan thatís
still going on with this administration Ė then America has really had it for
the amount of money that theyíre owing across the planet to just about
everybody there is. Quite something.

And the corruption too, within the US, itís a war-making
machine, you know, the Congress, when you look at the people and characters
involved in it. And I noticed yesterday, someone sent me an email to do
with Feinstein for instance. You have these lifer politicians. You
know, politics was never meant to be lifers, like it was a trade or an
occupation. It was supposed to be a one-time thing for any person who
went into it. How itís changed, eh. It says here, this guy who
wrote into me says:

For Diane Feinstein to accuse Gaddafi
of running Libya poorly, out of favoritism and graft, is simply
astonishing. Gaddafi was the envy of the financial world.

(A: And he was, by the way.)

No debt, tons of gold, oil, and a
massive water project. The US on the other hand is flat broke and the
entire system is run on massive corruption and graft.

(A: And thatís true. It says:)

Feinstein is supposedly the fifth
wealthiest Senator in the US, and she makes millions and millions off the
wars. Feinstein knows all about graft. Her billionaire investment
banker husband, Richard Bloom, has been investigated for getting enormous
no-bid government contracts to do with China and the US military.

So, thereís the hypocrisy for you. And these are the
guys who want you to go off and flatten everybody else across the planet, so
they can get in there and all their war machinery can get in, and new stuff
comes in, and of course, they get the contracts. Thereís corruption for
you, as far as Iím concerned. Itís just astonishing, but itís so open,
really in the US, isnít it? Britain is much better at that. Theyíve
had hundreds of years of hiding it, behind the House of Lords, so no one knows
whoís getting the deals made. But the US is more open about it. So,
anyway, thatís really whatís happening. They want a new Super Congress in
the US, and theyíll probably deal with the banker boys they borrow from and all
the big bondholders. Quite something else. I noticed too that the
Rothschild family are some of the biggest bondholders for US debt.
Theyíre buying it up like crazy.

Anyway, I
was going to mention too that this New World Order is to take over, remember,
Iíve gone through the agenda, everything that you need for survival,
personally. And thatís food, shelter, water, clothing, heat, everything
that you need for survival will be run by big international corporations.
And they donít want you to be independent in any way whatsoever. Even
with the watershed nonsense that came down quite a few years back, when they
were going around the country, and Canada too, and around town halls, trying to
get everyone to go along with watersheds, meaning that all water that comes
down from the sky eventually flows somewhere, so it really wasnít yours.
And not only that, then the Department of Wateries and Waterways should be in
charge of it all, basically. And if you had a rain barrel outside your
door, then really you were stealing somebody elseís water, because that
belonged to some corporation, you know. Itís just astonishing what we put
up with, because they use different terminology than straightforward talk, you
see. Now, it says:

Citi's Top Economist Says The
Water Market Will Soon Eclipse Oil

(A: And it is. Itís going to be one of the
biggest markets there is. It already is, when youíve got private
corporations owning the entire fresh water industry for Europe, for
instance. And it says:)

Citi economist Willem Buiter tells
clients to invest in the water industry which will soon become hotter than oil
(via FT Alphaville):

I expect to see in the near future
a massive expansion of investment in the water sector, including the production
of fresh, clean water from other sources (desalination, purification), storage,
shipping and transportation of water. I expect to see pipeline networks that
will exceed the capacity of those for oil and gas today.

I see fleets of water tankers
(single-hulled!) and storage facilities that will dwarf those we currently have
for oil, natural gas and LNG. I see new canal systems dug for water transportation,
similar in ambition and scale to those currently in progress in China, linking
the Yangtze River in the South to the Yellow River in the arid north.

(A: And then he goes on to India and other
countries, as well. He says:)

Water as an Asset Class

I expect to see a globally
integrated market for fresh water within 25 to 30 years.

(A: Well, itís already working right now. It
just hasnít got the whole world yet.)

Once the spot markets for water
are integrated, futures markets and other derivative water-based financial
instruments ó puts, calls, swaps ó both exchange-traded and OTC will follow.
There will be different grades and types of fresh water, just the way we have
light sweet and heavy sour crude oil today. Water as an asset class will, in my
view, become eventually the single most important physical-commodity based
asset class, dwarfing oil, copper, agricultural commodities and precious
metals.

So, thatís
why the big boys are into globalization as well. Do you understand, this
falls in with Karl Marx. He talked about this system, where one massive
factory in the world somewhere would make all the shoes for the world.
And one other massive factory would make all the refrigerators for instance
that you would need. Whatever you would actually need, one factory would
make it. And at the moment, theyíve based most of it in China, as we well
know, and China didnít pick up on that by its own. It didnít even get the
cash to start it on its own. Even their engineers were all trained in the
West. And then, of course, we gave them all of the deals to upload all
the factories from the West right across to China through the World Trade
Organization that our tax money helped fund. That was awful nice of us
all. Most folk floated through it, not even knowing that, that they were
giving the biggest gifts on the planet to China. So that the owners could
get awfully cheaply made stuff to sell to you at a very high price.
Thatís how the world is really planned though.

And Iím
also putting up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, with all these other
links, Iíll put up some of the history of the North American Union. And
this was from 2007, but itís got all the things that have been done up until
2007. Thereís other sites to do with whatís happened since then, because
itís still ongoing, as we integrate the Americas. And folk donít even
know. Itís odd too that you can show some people the actual articles from
the meetings that theyíve had, these big huge meetings and they still donít
want to believe you. Itís strange that, isnít it? But as soon as
someone on mainstream television comes out, a popular face and says the same
thing, theyíll suddenly believe it, and you canít even ask them, well why
wouldnít you believe me? Itís strange. Itís something in their
head. Theyíre trained to believe experts only, or familiar faces.
People in authority, in other words.

And Iíve mentioned before about all my life Iíve heard
about the population boomers and the baby boomers that they talked about from
the í50s onwards, basically, and how there was going to be a massive, massive
catastrophe down the road when they get old. And they never explained why
there would be a catastrophe when they got old. It would be very costly
etc, but they never said why.† Well,
see, they already knew in the í50s when they were publishing all this
stuff. And theyíd already had the international meeting for the United
Nations, in Britain, led off by the King of England at the time, right after
World War II, that they were going to depopulate the planet. So, Iíll
continue on that theme and tell you how it went from then on. Back with
more, after this break.

Hi folks, weíre back, Cutting Through the Matrix.
Talking about population control. And, as I say, towards the end of World
War II, the bigwigs up there, who, you know, the guys who are our lords and
masters, decided there was still too many of us, and that World War II wouldnít
kill enough off. And so, they had a big meeting in London, and the King was
there, and he oversaw it. And they talked about upcoming baby
boomers. That was their big problem. You see, what the public
didnít know, but these guys knew, is that they were going to give you a system
where theyíd encourage promiscuity but no children. And Iíve mentioned
before, from the books of Huxley, Julian Huxley, the first CEO of UNESCO, at
the United Nations, where he said that very thing. He said, weíll create a very
promiscuous society, where they can do anything they want, as long as they donít
have children. And thatís happened, of course. So, these guys
already knew that there were going to be baby boomers with no children to take
care of them, in other words, all before it happened. Amazing, isnít
it? You think they donít plan ahead? Of course they plan
ahead. Thatís what the government is there for. Thatís what
thousands of bureaucrats are there for. And theyíre not silly
buffoons. They really do look into all this data, and they do work out
the future, and theyíre pretty accurate.

So, they knew by the end of the í70s and í80s that there
would be very few children, and thatís why they also knew theyíd bring in
massive immigration to pay off the national debt. It was all worked out
back during World War II. Amazing, isnít it. Anyway, this article
here is about something similar in Australia. It says:

In recent years, there has been intense debate
about the population size to which Australia should aim in the 21st century.
Some argue for a much lower population than we have now. The environmentalist,
Tim Flannery, for example, has suggested that Australians might opt for a
future population of between 6 and 12 million people. Others argue for a
considerably larger population.

And it goes on to the different sides of the whole thing.
And then they go into the demographic reality, etc, etc, etc. And then
how theyíd have to bring in immigration, etc, once again, because the people in
Australia are losing their fertility it says here. Like everywhere, else,
you know, where civilization comes, something kicks in, and we start changing
their clothing, and wearing strange things, and guys donít really want to get
married, and neither do the women either by the way, and thereís no incentive
to have children anymore. Youíre told to have fun forever until youíre
going along in crutches at the age of 60 still dressing like a youngster.
Thatís what theyíve given you as a culture. And this was all decided a
long time ago. And it ties in with the Council on Foreign Relations that
met in Australia in 1937 or í38 with the Royal Institute of International
Affairs, all sponsored by Mr. Rockefeller in the US, and they talked about this
whole future world and where they would even bring the immigration from into
Australia and into Britain, and they were dead on. They said they would
start with India and Britain and maybe Greece and other countries, for
Australia. And then later on, bring in people from even the African
countries into Australia, like a timetable. And you think youíre just stumbling
along down through time. And yet, non-elected organizations that run your
parliaments have already decided before you were even born, how it was all
going to go. But yeah, itís amazing. Youíre all becoming infertile,
but everyone apparently is having a good time. And apparently, thatís all
that really matters, isnít it? Having a good time?

And I just want to touch tonight too, on all of the
incredible criminal laws, really that are happening with more and more
government officials, Iíve got different articles on them, just walking out of
Parliament in Britain, right into the very groups that lobbied these particular
characters in all of the areas that are in vogue now. And thatís security
and security machinery and war-making stuff and so on. Also, Iím going to
put up an article here, to show you at least the stuff that they claim is above
board:

Ministerial gifts, hospitality, travel and
meetings with external organizations in the Ministry of Defence.

And it actually names these different ones, and all the
gifts they got from all the different countries that are lobbying them, while
they were still members of the British service, basically. Itís not legal
to take gifts, supposedly. Iím sure they all do it, but itís not supposed
to be legal. If they do it the wise way, theyíll do it like Tony
Blair. You leave office, and then you get rewarded with 24 seats on
different boards that you donít have to attend, and you get a few million
pounds right off the bat, because youíve been an awfully good boy. But
thatís the real world that we do live in. Itís just astonishing.
And I wanted to touch too on regionalism, just before I go on to callers.

Governor Cuomo
Launches Long Island Regional Economic Development Council

(A: This is a copy of Britain
for the regionalism. I hope you realize thatís what it is. And it
says.)

Council Will Drive
Local Economic Development and Improve Business Climate Statewide
Long Island Regional Council to be Led by Stuart Rabinowitz & Kevin Law

It says here. So, thatís to kick it off there for
New York and it will go across the rest of the US states as well. Itís
pretty well the same as I can see. Thatís building houses, everything,
that looks like regionalism and Communitarianism to me, jobs as well. Jobs
for those areas. So, thatís Communitarianism. And again, unelected
councils. So, there you are. Thatís pretty well there as
well. Now, thereís callers on the line. Thereís Lucretia from
Oregon. Are you there, Lucretia?

Lucretia: I am, Alan. Thank you.† I wanted to ask you a couple of questions
dealing with scalar energy or HAARP, and I guess my first question was that,
you know, you mentioned in your incredible books, that are ten times deeper
than all the wonderful programs youíve done. I mean, boy, I just grew so
much. I really encourage everybody that loves you to buy both of your
books, theyíre amazing. But you mentioned Nikola Tesla, and you know
Nikola is like Nicholas, St. Nick. What is Tesla? You said there
was something to the last name. What was that?

Alan: Tesla is like the tessellated floor of the Masonic
lodge. Some of them say tesserated, and some say tessellated. And
even Albert Pike argued over it. Itís to do with the black and the white,
the good, the evil, the dark, the light, thatís what itís really to do with,
but hold on, and weíll come back after this.

Alan: Hi folks, weíre back. This is Cutting Through
the Matrix, talking to Lucretia about Nikola Tesla basically. A
mysterious guy that Iím sure, the story weíre given about him is very
superficial, obviously, because I really donít believe that a man comes out of
nowhere and just knows exactly what he wants to do, knows itís going to work,
and has to invent a whole bunch of electronic gadgets to make the main gadget.
And so he makes all of these for the first time, all these super capacitors and
so on, just to make his main gadget. And weíll never even know who,
really, I think who he really, really was.

Lucretia: I donít think so either. And I heard you
on Alex yesterday, saying that maybe theyíre a couple of hundred years ahead of
us, but I know in your books, you think theyíre bringing these technologies
back out, you know, that are maybe thousands of years old. But I guess my
question is, I had heard Dr. Judy Wood a number of times. I actually went
to the site, Dr. Judy Wood, and first watched the video with John Hutchinson,
and have you met John Hutchinson or talked with him, because he supposedly has
reproduced a lot of Nikola Teslaís items, including floating a seventy-pound
cannonball using frequencies that repel.†
And make it weightless. Have you talked with him?

Alan: No, but Iíve seen a bunch of videos from different
people across the world, who are into this particular area of science, who have
done the same thing. So, it seems to be an old technology. We forget, for
instance, even that one of the favorite hobbies of Benjamin Franklin was
playing with electricity. We tend to think itís more of a 20th
century thing, which it wasnít. And Franklin was playing with it, and
batteries, and trying to find useful purposes for it, and that was the in-thing
in the 1700s, and even before. So, electricity has been around for a
long, long time. And weíve got to realize that even the ancient Romans Ė
Benjamin Franklin, you see, if youíre a Mason at that time especially, a Mason
longs to be known as a scientist. That was the in-thing in the
1700s. So, you had Jefferson who was into inventing things, quite
important things. And of course, Franklin too. And they eventually
put the lightning rod after Franklin, but they borrowed that, because the
Romans had lightning rods, and they used to have it on the temple of
Jupiter. And on certain nights, when it was really overcast, like it gets
here and very warm, you know thereís a thunderstorm coming, people would flood
into the temple to watch the display. And sometimes lightning would strike the
rod. And then the big idol of Jupiter would light up. And it
actually has in the history books at one time, about five or six of these
priests were all holding hands and touching the big idol when it got struck by
lightning and they all got killed. So, that was quite a display.
Anyway, so itís as old as the hills, electricity. And as I say, thereís
no doubt about it. They have found batteries, legitimate batteries made
of clay, and theyíve got lead and copper plates in them, and, just like a
modern car battery, add the acid and wire it up and on go the lights. So
they had this.

Lucretia: Did you watch the video, itís called the new
Hiroshima, that Dr. Judy Wood? Thereís a number of other buildings that I
like had no clue, like three, four and five, or four, five and six, that are
totally gone, and thereís sixty-foot holes. Itís like they evaporated
those buildings and literally, the dust floated into the air and away and they
literally, everything was removed.

Alan: Well, even the stories have been removed. I
mean, the day that they started bombing Libya, it was as though it had never
happened; Japan just disappeared from the news media. I noticed
yesterday, theyíre in an awful mess in Japan, and no one is offering them aid.

Lucretia: No, I understand that, Alan, but Iím just
saying, you know, we heard about towers one, two, and some people heard about seven
being demolished or brought down. But we didnít hear about like three,
four, and five where the buildings are gone. And even building one and
two, you can hear George Stephanopoulos that day saying, God, thereís no
building. And thereís only like two, three inches of dust. And
supposedly the dust went down to one-hundredth of a red blood cell, as far as
the size. There was no dust left. And cars were either disrupted or
turned over, but perfectly fine, paint and everything normal, or they were totally
toasted and wasted and rusted, and even anything steel on them was gone.

Alan: Yeah. I do know that. The whole thing
stunk.

Lucretia: There was something in the dust, and there was
something that they used, some scalar or whatever, that just literally repelled
all particles and they just became dust and then floated up and evaporated.

Alan: Well, the technology is certainly there. And I
know that when it happened in the US, with the great bombings that went on
there, that the same thing happened there. Now, personally, Iíve got a
different theory on what happened in the US. I think the first attempt at
bombing the towers a few years prior to that. I do know that the company
they got in to try and reinforce any damage and go through the whole buildings
for a few years, actually, I think they were the ones who planted all of the
special new explosives. And I think they were done a few years
beforehand, and they just sat and waited for the right time and then blew up
the buildings when the aircraft approached and went into them. Thatís my
opinion, because thereís no way, as I say. And it goes against all
science. You cannot simply evaporate steel just like that. It just
doesnít happen. It was a few months later in fact in Brazil, a plane went
into a high-rise there, also made by the same group that built that, that
happened to be the Bin Laden group by the way, and the Bush Consortium.
And the plane went into it, there was a fire on one floor, and thatís all that
happened. It didnít come down and melt and all of that.

Lucretia: Well, Iím wondering through the satellites, I
know on the illuminati card deck they say the satellites donít just report the
weather, they make the weather. And John Hutchinson said the satellites
are putting out frequencies that are killing the trees.

Alan: Well, I donít know about killing the trees, but the
satellites, the Star Wars Program, when it first came out, had a lot of
information put in the media at the time, and they did say that these could be
arrayed, satellite arrays. And they could certainly be used for new kinds
of particle beam weaponry, to be used on enemies. So, Iím sure, if we
knew what was floating up around space, around here, we wouldnít sleep at night
at all to be honest with you. Itís that bad, I think.

Lucretia: Well, I think that 9/11 was a lot scarier
though. I think itís way more, itís far scarier technology than we
realize.

Alan: Theyíll always have way advanced technology.
Theyíll show you the latest stealth fighter. And even when they showed us
the first stealth fighter, during the Bosnian War, you look into the records
and they actually had it for thirty years prior to that, before we knew about
it. So, itís the same with everything. And when they show you the
latest one, Iím sure theyíve got a nice little beautiful UFO from Area 51 that
probably does a better job of it, that they wonít use just yet.

Thatís the world youíre living in. And during
warfare too, itís the same thing. The first people who must be told the
lies are your own people, ďWell, this is the latest gadget weíve got,Ē because
itís your own people who start talking and then the enemy find out. So,
you never tell your own people just how far ahead you are. You never,
ever do that. And they keep us in the dark. On the weaponry side of
things, you donít even want to go into it, and even into the Janeís Magazine,
the military magazine of all the stuff theyíre working on, because youíll have
nightmares, honestly.

Lucretia: I hear you. And I know in your book, you
said, Shakespeare said the world is a stage, and they certainly do set up their
stages for giving us our reality.

Alan: Yes. Oh, they give us a show. They give
us a show. Thereís no doubt about it. Thanks for calling, and Iíll try
and take Larry now, from Louisiana if heís hanging on there. Is Larry
still there?

Larry: Hi, Alan. You know, with all this shooting
going on around, I think itís well understood that nobody is responsible for
your personal safety except for you.† No
matter how much you pay the policy enforcement agents. What is, and you
donít have to answer this if you think Iím getting too personal. What is
your view on the use of a firearm to defend yourself and the lives of your
family?

Alan: Well, Iíll give you the Canadian perspective first,
all right. The official Canadian perspective is youíre allowed to use
just enough force to defend yourself, and your family, but no more than just
enough force. Thatís how it is, itís cloudily worded in other
words. We have had cases in Canada where people have defended themselves
from burglars breaking in, and one guy fell down during the burglary, by
himself, he wasnít knocked down, and he cut his legs and he sued the people for
having broken glass. They were working on something inside the house at
the time. So he sued successfully. Theyíve tried to demoralize the
people so much by saying, oh, no, no, you canít do anything. In other
words, in Canada, you can almost legally stand there and allow yourself to be
murdered. Thatís a good Canadian. Thatís the definition of a good
Canadian. But obviously, obviously nature being nature, never mind
politics and agendas, nature being nature, you should be able to use ultimate
force.

Larry: Ultimate force. Now, I heard a doctor, he had
a doctorate, and he worked at a, he was one of those bigwig teachers at a
Mennonite university saying, oh, he would never use a gun to defend
himself. Now, isnít it the democracies and the policy enforcement
agencies, and things like that, isnít that whatís come through to disarm the
people at large? He applauded the president up there, I think Norway,
because the president said, weíre going to get more democracy and more
safety. In other words, more police. But isnít that the exact thing
that disarms the people and makes them soft targets. That guy wasnít
ready to die that day. Heís not dead. Okay. And theyíll be
the first ones. Theyíre like a burden on society, these people that wonít
use firearms. Theyíll be the first ones to call the policy enforcement
agent, which is what, 90 minutes away, so the carnage is done before they ever
get there.

Alan: The police arenít really there to save life, you
understand. The police are there to report a crime and arrest
someone. Thatís all they come for. They donít care whoís right,
wrong, or anything else. They just come to arrest someone for a
crime. It doesnít matter who it is. And often itís the caller
actually who gets arrested. However, youíve got to look into the United
Nations treaty that was signed by the US, Canada, and all the countries, back
in the sixties, and it was complete disarmament for a peaceful world. And
in there, it meant complete disarmament. The US President signed it,
Britain, everybody else signed it too. And it literally meant the only
authority that will have the use of ultimate force, that means to kill, will be
the United Nations. Thatís the goal weíre heading towards right now, in
fact. And the people themselves will have no right whatsoever even to
defend themselves. Thatís basically written into that law, that treaty
that was signed at the United Nations. Iíll try and find that link
tonight and put it up on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, but itís for
complete disarmament in a peaceful world. And the only ones who can use
authority or force on behalf of the United Nations are your recognized police
forces and so on. But an individual technically would have to allow
themselves to be murdered, or at least fight back with maybe matchsticks or
something, I donít know, if youíre allowed to have matches, or maybe a
club. But if you hurt that person, believe you me, even if they come into
your home in the middle of the night and raped your children, if you hurt them,
the laws, literally, theyíll spend about two months in court trying to figure
out just how much force you used to try and save yourself and your family and
decide if it was too much, or whatever. Thatís how crazy it is now.

Itís to teach, you see, the whole world is being taught a
lesson right now, that weíre all at the bottom, at the bottom level, all the
junk gene people. Thatís all of us. Weíre not up there, you see,
with the multi-billionaires. Weíll squabble with ourselves anyway.
Thatís what theyíre taught. There will always be domestic violence, there
will always be different squabbles breaking out, drunks, drugs, that kind of
thing, jealousies, neighbors fighting, and thatís the way itís seen. They
donít come in and say whoís right and whoís wrong. They just see a bunch
of folk arguing, theyíll arrest the whole lot of them. Thatís all they
care about now. And they take that now as part of their training.
Thatís a normal given for them. However, in the end, when it comes to
deadly force, the United Nations is to be the only one eventually allowed to
use it.

Larry: Well, that really is just a complete form of
insanity. And if you do not meet deadly force with deadly force, that is
firearm against firearm, and your familyís blood comes running on the ground,
then it is on your hands.

Alan: Well, technically, I donít think you could even live
with yourself, could you? You know, you couldnít live with yourself
knowing that you did nothing.

Larry: Exactly. Thank you, Alan. Appreciate
your program.

Alan: And thanks for calling. And now thereís Bob
from Texas there. Are you there, Bob?

Bob: Hello. Hello, Alan. Thank you for taking
my call. I have a quick couple of questions. Iíve been reading,
since weíre nose-diving into Communism, I got a book on quotations from
Chairman Mao Tse Tung. Interesting, I got it, happened to get it at a
used bookstore. But itís so prophetic. You know, Iím sitting here,
and itís like I can, and then I also got Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the
Communist Manifesto, and itís you know, itís like a checklist. You can
just check off everything thatís happening, to where we are becoming, or
actually we are, in some very, you know, initial stages of Marxism.

Alan: Oh, youíre beyond that.

Bob: And then I was wondering too, what are we to do with
this? You know, you know about this. I am, what Iím doing is Iím
writing all this stuff down, and Iím putting in things that are happening
today, to kind of show people, look, this is whatís happening. Iím doing
this at work. You know, and I donít care if they think Iím a nut, or
whatever. And also there was a thing in here, and you know, you being in
Canada, there was something, Norman Bethune. I mean, Mao praised him, but
then, you know, he was like the author or the pusher of Socialized medicine for
Canada, and kind of lauded as the hero, but then he wound up dying, they said
he died of blood poisoning by operating on troops and so forth, but I kind of
wonder if he didnít start seeing some things, you know, because the author of
this book was killed in a weird plane crash. Do you see what Iím
saying? Itís like once they come into some sort of truth, all of a sudden
they die.

Alan: Well, Norman Bethune was the great hero, they say,
of Canada, who went off to help the Communists. And they have statues of
him in Toronto parks alongside Mao Tse Tung and different Chinese leaders,
literally, in Canada. And they went up. All these statues went up
in the time of Pierre Trudeau who was a Prime Minister here, who also was a Communist,
but he ran under the Liberal; like Khrushchev said, they donít call them
Communists in this country, here we call them Liberal. And he was a
Communist, because he was a young Communist leader for the Comintern for
Canada, and Trudeau led the Canadian delegation over to Moscow in 1952.
Every newspaper knew that at the time, but when Trudeau ran for office, none of
them happened to mention that fact. So, up went all the statues to the
Communists across Canada.

Bob: You know Mao, he said, in memory of Norman Bethune,
December 21, 1939: What kind of spirit is this that makes a foreigner
selflessly adopt the cause of the Chinese peopleís liberation for his own?

Alan: Thatís correct.

Bob: I mean, when you read this, this book is incredible.

Alan: Yes, another one is a book called, You Can Trust the
Communists. Read that one too. You Can Trust the Communists.
Very interesting.

Frank: Can you shed any light on the significance of the
name Ford, as far as the Ford Foundation and the different fronts and whatnot
that are always mentioned. Iím always hearing about the Ford Foundations
are sponsoring this and that, internationally and in the United States.
And Iím not talking about the modeling agency or the Ford Motor Company.
But is there not some significance to the Ford Foundation?

Alan: Yes. I think the Ford Foundation, it still
goes under the Ford Foundation, but I think the same board that runs the
Rockefeller Foundation took it over. They manage it today.

Frank: Okay. I was just wondering where the name
Ford came from. I was assuming that was not Henry Ford.

Alan: Iím not sure if it was, but it was definitely made
up, I think, after he died, regardless. And it might have been, and taken
over eventually, because all of these multi-millionaires set up foundations for
charitable purposes, supposedly, which is a sort of tax write-off for
them. And that was the reason they started them off. However, I do
know that the Ford was taken over by the same board members ultimately as the
Rockefeller Foundation. Some of them also sit on the boards of Carnegie
and Guggenheim Foundations as well.

Frank: Okay. Okay, thank you, Alan.

Alan: Yeah, thanks for calling.

And itís really strange, that, that youíll have the same
people chair-hopping from one board to the other, but itís really the same
people doing a round in charge of billions and billions of dollars and funding
nongovernmental organizations that end up lobbying government and this is
really what they now call democracy, those with the biggest lobbying groups
that appear to come from the populace, are really funded and run by
foundations, which comprise the parallel government, as they say. Thanks
for calling, everybody. And from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada,
itís good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.