zekecatz

woothallo

I'm strongly considering this as a purchase, but I'm having trouble unseeing genitalia once my brain processed what I was seeing as such. It probably would have helped if the description hadn't brought the attention to it. It's similar phenomena to when I was told about the arrow in the FedEx logo.

constantvelocitty

spiderweb1986

woothallo wrote:I'm strongly considering this as a purchase, but I'm having trouble unseeing genitalia once my brain processed what I was seeing as such. It probably would have helped if the description hadn't brought the attention to it. It's similar phenomena to when I was told about the arrow in the FedEx logo.

holothuria

As someone who has studied paleontology and anthropology at the University of Iowa within the last year, I feel safe in saying that Lisa Garza does not teach or research here. You sure you don't mean Ohio or Idaho? I can't believe Woot would botch up intriguing scientific reportage with such a blatant citation error.

pharmacide

woothallo wrote:I'm strongly considering this as a purchase, but I'm having trouble unseeing genitalia once my brain processed what I was seeing as such. It probably would have helped if the description hadn't brought the attention to it. It's similar phenomena to when I was told about the arrow in the FedEx logo.

Definitely the first thing I saw as well... I didn't even read the description. His outfit just seems so unnecessarily tight in that region.

BlueEagle23

woothallo wrote:I'm strongly considering this as a purchase, but I'm having trouble unseeing genitalia once my brain processed what I was seeing as such. It probably would have helped if the description hadn't brought the attention to it. It's similar phenomena to when I was told about the arrow in the FedEx logo.

It's just the contour of his suit against his thighs? Looks to me like this guy has something in common with a horse.

There's an arrow in the FedEx logo? [Google search] Oh wow, how have I never seen that before...

embhorn

kawooda1

BlueEagle23 wrote:It's just the contour of his suit against his thighs? Looks to me like this guy has something in common with a horse.

There's an arrow in the FedEx logo? [Google search] Oh wow, how have I never seen that before...

I was just staring at the FedEx logo, wondering what in the heck you guys were talking about... however, once you see it, you'll never see it any other way. In case there are other slow people like me, it's the white space between the E and the X.

TXAG96

fmfbrestel

"Incredibly thick, calloused tissue that would not be impossible to grow without incredible friction."

Not to be the grammar police, but this is a triple negative. The sentence should read "...that would be impossible..." or "...that would not be possible...". As is, the sentence actually means that the callouses are NOT necessarily the product of the friction, and therefore do NOT support the following conclusion.

magyargirl

magyargirl

fmfbrestel wrote:"Incredibly thick, calloused tissue that would not be impossible to grow without incredible friction."

Not to be the grammar police, but this is a triple negative. The sentence should read "...that would be impossible..." or "...that would not be possible...". As is, the sentence actually means that the callouses are NOT necessarily the product of the friction, and therefore do NOT support the following conclusion.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.