We did invent the airplane, but NOT the first car..... Laffin is correct!

Landed On the Moon? ROTFL!!!!!!! If we did this in 1969 with an onboard computer in the spacecraft??? LOL!!!!!! A Computer to control the capsule back then would have been the size of the pentagon!!!!!

Besides, how come we haven't been back? How come NO-ONE else has been there....

These sites, scientifically refute all arguements against the Apollo lunar landings. People need to stop listening to everything they hear and start thinking for themselves.

Just so you all know, none of this is personal, I still like you all.

Both myself and MP3Mogul both believe that the USA Never landed on the moon and both of us were around when the Hoax took place LOL !!! Also like MP3Mogul has already said why aint they been back the only thing I can think of it wasn't BIG Enough for the Yanks ROTFL !!!

Supporters of the conspiracy theory welcomed the news that astronomers were to photograph the landing sites. But Marcus Allen, the British publisher of Nexus magazine and a long-time advocate of the theory, said photographs of the lander would not prove that the US put men on the moon. "Getting to the moon really isn't much of a problem - the Russians did that in 1959," he said. "The big problem is getting people there."

According to Mr Allen, NASA was forced to send robots to the moon and faked the manned missions because radiation levels in space were lethal to humans.

Now astronomers hope to kill off the conspiracy theory forever by using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) - by far the most powerful telescope in the world (Something the Yanks aint got the Biggest of ROTFL) - to spot the Apollo lunar landers.

Operated by European astronomers in the Chilean Andes, the VLT has four mirrors eight metres across linked by optical fibres. It can see a single human hair from 16 kilometres away.

air·plane ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ârpln)
n.
Any of various winged vehicles capable of flight,
generally heavier than air and driven by jet engines or propellers.

(taken from dictionary.com)

So, if you define an airplane as only a winged vehicle capable of flight, then Sir George Cayley (from England) would have been the first in 1804 with the first manned flight ever recorded... however he was using an unpowered glider, so it could be debated it isn't an airplane... but I've seen some pretty convincing gliders! But let's just say that this one doens't count...

So then the first person to create and fly an airplane would be Clément Ader, a Frenchman. He invented the first powered airplane, which used a steam engine, later deemed unfit for use in controlled flight. However, he did manage to create an airplane capable of taking off and landing through the power of that engine, and bringing himself along for the ride.

But we couldn't possibly have a *frenchman* being the first to make a powered airplane, so most people prefer to look at the Wright brothers, who made their first manned/powered flight 10 years later in 1900. This would be the first gasoline powered airplane capable of supporting a man.

So like I said, it depends on your deffinition of airplane. But for me, I'll stick with Sir George Cayley. He was the first to do a manned flight, and was the one who proved it was all possible (95 years BEFORE Wilbur Wright writes the Smithsonian Institute and affirms his belief that human flight was possible )

I also cannot be persuaded that somebody landed onto the Moon and then return back...not enough material.

What about the lunar rocks brought back? It has been scientifically proven that these rocks cannot be found on Earth. And coming down as meteorites is ruled out due to the fact that the rocks were never super-heated (something to do with the type/ammount of gas found in small pockets of the rock).

I will leave this to MP3Mogul because I do happen to know that he personally did some research on this Issue and I could keep giving you links where even the NASA people have got there own doubts but I will still say that I do not believe there have been any humans on the Surface of the Moon !!! But we would like you to EXPLAIN to us why they haven't be back and landed again now we have the technology to prove that they do land there !!!

tbh, I'm not positive why we haven't been back, except maybe the fact that there's no reason. However, I do know that NASA has tentative plans on going back. They are planning on setting up a waypoint for the future trip to Mars. You also got to understand, it is still expensive to go to the moon, it's not just the average trip into space. So unless they have a real reason to go, I understand why we are reluctant to go back.

I would like to know your reasoning behind why you believe we haven't been to the moon?

Once again, none of this is personal, as I realize I kinda sound bitchy (for a lack of a better word).

If you go to this site: http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/index.html , which I've posted twice now, it'll explain virtually every point you just made. Everything from the flying flag to the cross hairs being "behind" objects is easily explained through scientific fact.