Florida Prison Sentences Lengthen an Average Of 166% Since 1990, Most By Far in U.S.

Criminal justice experts say they weren’t surprised by last week’s study showing that the time Florida prisoners spend behind bars has grown more than in any other state – a 166 percent increase in the average sentence between 1990 and 2009.

He cited 1995’s “Truth in Sentencing” law, requiring inmates to serve at least 85 percent of their sentences, and two 1999 laws: “Three Strikes,” by which a third felony conviction requires a minimum sentence of 25 years to life if someone is injured or killed, and “10-20-Life,” which established mandatory minimum sentences for crimes involving firearms.

“Politics in Florida has been such that public officials are afraid to appear, quote, ‘weak on crime,'” McDonough said. “And the way that’s defined is, ‘Don’t lighten up on the sentencing in any way whatsoever.'”

He said the state’s prison terms jumped so much, so fast because in 1990, Florida inmates were serving just 30 percent of their sentences.

“We had prison overcrowding at that time, so we came up with a parole policy and a probation policy that really let a lot of inmates out much, much too early,” McDonough said. “So the pendulum had swung one way. And then throughout the 90’s and the last ten years, we saw the pendulum swing … the other way.

“So you came up with a series of laws and policies that brought us up to this incredible increase in length of stay.”

The Flagler County Commission wants voters to approve a sales tax referendum this fall (the commission has yet to agree to place the referendum on the ballot) to finance either a new jail or an expanded jail.

The state’s position is that such laws have reduced crime immensely.

“Tough-on-crime initiatives have successfully reversed the lenient and disastrous criminal-justice policies of the early 1990s in Florida that caused so much suffering,” notes the DOC web site. “Thanks to the dedication of our state’s law enforcement officers, correctional officers and state prosecutors who enforce tough laws like 10-20-LIFE, Florida’s ‘Index Crime’ rate was the lowest in 34 years and the violent crime rate is the lowest in a quarter century.”

Nevertheless, Florida’s crime rate remains one of the nation’s highest: In 2009, the state’s violent crime rate (for murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault) was the nation’s ninth highest, behind the District of Columbia, Alaska, Delaware, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, South Carolina and Tennessee. It’s an improvement, but only a slight one, over Florida’s standing in 1990, when its crime rate was the nation’s second-worst, after D.C. The rate itself was cut in half in Florida, but it was cut by 40 percent across the nation without nearly the harshness in sentencing laws that Florida passed.

Crime has been dropping for decades, but Florida’s inmate population has risen by a factor of five over 30 years, during which time the general population has barely doubled. As of June 30, 1990, Florida prisons housed 42,733 offenders; by June 30, 2011, the figure was 102,319.

During the period examined by the study, Florida sentences for violent crimes increased from 2.1 years to 5 years, or 137 percent, while drug-related sentences rose 194 percent, from an average of 0.8 years to 2.3 years.

The 166 percent increase in the average prison sentence cost Florida taxpayers $1.4 billion in 2009, according to Pew.

Meanwhile, most states have embraced the concept of “smart justice,” said prison chaplain Allison DeFoor, a former judge and sheriff. “Smart justice” is a compendium of performance measures, accountability and transparency designed to keep inmates from returning to prison after their release.

Fully one-third of Florida offenders return to prison within five years, DeFoor said. “That’s not an efficient system…We talk about recidivism like it’s an intellectual concept. Well, every new [act of] recidivism is somebody’s grandmother’s house got broken into or their car got jacked.”

Florida’s “smart justice” proponents have tried, for instance, to reduce sentences for non-violent offenders. Sen. Ellyn Bogdanoff, R-Fort Lauderdale, repeatedly sponsored a measure that would have ended mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders, who would remain in custody during the rehabilitation portion of their sentences. She said many addicts have mental health issues that cause them to self-medicate, and that with treatment, they can become taxpayers instead of inmates.

But while the Senate passed Bogdanoff’s bill 40-0 and the House 112-4, Gov. Rick Scott vetoed the measure, saying it would be an injustice to victims.

“Justice to victims of crime is not served when a criminal is permitted to be released early from a sentence imposed by the courts,” he wrote in his veto message. “This bill would permit criminals to be released after serving 50 percent of their sentences, thus creating an unwarranted exception to the rule that inmates serve 85 percent of their imposed sentences.”

As to the Pew study, DOC spokeswoman Ann Howard said the agency wasn’t involved in the research, “so we will refrain from comment out of respect and etiquette to the researchers.”

“The department’s only role is to execute the court orders, added DOC spokeswoman Jo Ellyn Rackleff. “The judges apply the sentences according to Florida statutes, which are passed by the Legislature.”

Pew examined nonviolent offenders released in 2004, concluding that 14 percent of all offenders released in Florida could have served shorter sentences with no threat to public safety.

DeFoor said the most important thing about the study is that it measures the evidence. “It’s ultimately got to be about accountability,” he said. “We need to be driven by the data, not by emotional reactions on either side.”

3 Responses for “Florida Prison Sentences Lengthen an Average Of 166% Since 1990, Most By Far in U.S.”

That early release bill he vetoed? Only 337 of the 102,000 inmates currently in custody would even have been eligible for release under it according to the state’s own estimates. And Rick lied when he said they would get out at 50% of their sentences – they would have served more than 50% of their sentences…after serving 50% of their sentence, they would have had to apply to have their sentences converted to the early release program. THEN after that process took at least a month of paperwork, they would have had to wait for their turn in the 180 day substance abuse program, and who knows how long that wait might be. Then they would have had to complete the 180 day program And what “victims”? The eligible offenses are all non-violent, meaning that they are mostly victimless drug possession crimes.

We have the longest sentences in the nation, and one of the highest crime rates. Yup, those long sentences sure deter crime. NOT.

DOC is currently paying a lot of lip service to the concept of rehabilitation programs to prevent recidivism but the reality? It’s just talk. There’s no money and no real programs. And no real interest in having them. Because the DOC and the people who run it aren’t interested in putting themselves – or Rick Scott’s private prison contractor buddies – out of business.