Kaboom! Obama's Ex Chief Of Intelligence: "Mueller Report Will Be Disappointing And Anti-Climactic"

it's now 2 confirming sources that says the same thing which is Mueller report will not go the way Democrats want. Both sources 1 a Democrat who is the chief Whitehouse correspondent and now source number 2 is Obama's Chief of Intelligence, James Clapper.

Meaning of Anti-Climactican·ti·cli·mac·tic/ˌan(t)ēˌklīˈmaktik,ˌanˌtīklīˈmaktik/Submitadjectiveadjective: anti-climacticcausing disappointment at the end of an exciting or impressive series of events."it was an anticlimactic finish to the match

From the liberal The Hill Media outlet om February 20, 2019: Mueller report may be ‘anti-climactic,' says Obama's ex-intelligence director

February 20, 2019 - 09:50 AM ESTBy Tal Axelrod

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said Wednesday that he's far from sure that special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation will clear up questions about President Trump and Russia.

He said he was hopeful the Mueller probe will provide some answers, but warned it might not even draw a conclusion on whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

"I think the hope is that the Mueller investigation will clear the air on this issue once and for all. I'm really not sure it will, and the investigation, when completed, could turn out to be quite anti-climactic." Clapper said Wednesday on CNN.

ABC News White House correspondent Jonathan Karl says his sources tell him that Robert Mueller's anticipated report on the special counsel's investigation into Russian election meddling and possible collusion between President Trump's campaign and Moscow is "almost certain to be anti-climactic."

"There have been expectations that have been building, of course, for over a year," Karl told "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos on Sunday. "But people who are closest to what Mueller has been doing, interacting with the special counsel, caution me that this report is almost certain to be anti-climactic."

"If you look at what the FBI was investigating in that New York Times report, you look at what they were investigating, Mueller did not go anywhere with that investigation," Karl continued. "He has been writing his report in real time through these indictments and we have seen nothing from Mueller on the central question of, was there any coordination, collusion, with the Russians in the effort to meddle in the elections? Or was there even any knowledge on the part of the president or anybody in his campaign with what the Russians were doing, there's been no indication of that."

Just as i predicted 2 years ago in this same forum. There was no Collusion. All this started because of the Steele dossier who worked for fusion GPS, whose matarials were given to the FBI by the wife of Obama DOJ official named Ohr. This women worked Hillary during her campaign in 2016. Another Interesting thing is the deputy FBI director named McCabe who was fired well his wife also worked for the Hillary campaign.

McCabe was fired because he was leaking classified informations about Trump and the Mueller investigation to the media. The person McCabe used was Lisa Paige. Lisa Paige is the same FBI lawyer who was also fired by the FBI for showing baised against Trump during the investigation, she also worked for Mueller and Mueller also fired her for this.

Lisa Paige was the lover of one Peter Stzrok. Peter was the FBI agent who entrapped General Flynn. Peter Stzrok worked for the FBI and was the lead agent when the FBI handled the case. When the case was given to Mueller, Stzrok was the lead investigator on Muellers team. Peter was fired by both the FBI and Meuller for his biased texts against Trump.

All these folks were all officials in the Obama administration. Mueller is a Obama official, Ohr is a Obama official. Lisa Paige is a obama official. McCabe is a Obama official. Peter Stzrok is a obama official.

Republicans in the Senate and the house didn't know these guys were all connected to the Clinton campaign of 2016. But when they found out is was too late.

2 years later and still no evidence. The media is running interference on behalf of the Democrats in trying to steer the Mueller investigation. Yesterday the New York time wrote a article saying Trump is now guilty of trying to interfere in the district of New yorks case against Cohen at the same time admitting there was no evidence of obstruction.

Now Democrats are raising questions in the house because of this report from the NYT. The media in General has shown again and again they are on the lefts side. This entire investigation started because the media published the Steele dossier which was paid for by the Clinton campaign in 2016 as opposition research against Trump.

Obama's administration was the source of these matarials the media got on Trump.

The rat line points towards the Democrats and Clinton campaign as the source of this witch hunt.