The LA Riots twenty years on

Whether it’s called a riot, a rebellion, or civil unrest, the tragic chapter in Los Angeles history that sparked days of violent protest 20 years ago invites intense discussion today.

Earlier this month, Los Angeles residents met at the University of Southern California to hash out some of the issues highlighted during the incident.

By now, the statistics are well known: the incident some call the Los Angeles Riots resulted in more than 50 deaths, 3,600 fires, 1,100 destroyed buildings, 2,000 damaged businesses and property damages totaling $1 billion, of which 50 percent was incurred by Korean Americans.

The panel discussion at USC was sponsored by El Centro Chicano, the Asian Pacific American Student Services and the Center for Black Student and Cultural Affairs.

According to a release advertising the event, “Three names that conjure a static image of Black-Korean violence in the American consciousness” are “Civil Unrest,” “The LA Riots,” and “Sa-I-Gu.” The event was advertised as an evening of reflection and dialogue with those who were actually there – store owners, police, and community activists.

Among the questions the panel wanted to address: what was the root cause that led to L.A. exploding? Will the embers of racial and economic injustice ignite again? Also, what are some of the positive changes that have come out of the event that was sparked by the acquittal of officers in a police brutality case?

In the beating case, African American motorist Rodney King was the victim of police brutality. The entire incident was caught on videotape on March 3, 1991 by bystander, George Holliday.

The footage showed white LAPD officers repeatedly striking King with their batons while other officers stood by watching.

Four white LAPD officers were later tried in a state court for the beating. Three were acquitted. The jury failed to reach a verdict for the fourth. The announcement of the acquittals sparked city-wide violence and fires in April 1992. A later federal trial for civil rights violations ended with two of the officers found guilty and sent to prison and the other two officers acquitted.

Now a Beverly Hills Police Officer, Rachel Shannon was a young cadet coming out of the Los Angeles Police Department when the city was engulfed in violence two decades ago. She said a good thing that has come out of the incident is that citizens are more aware of their rights when confronted with police officers who may be treating them unfairly.

“There are cell phones and cameras everywhere now. And people know they can use them,” she said. “Excessive force [by officers] has gone down because everyone is taping.”

During the incident in 1992, Shannon said the entire contingent of 8,000 LAPD officers was kept at a bus depot in South Los Angeles for several hours and told not to go out into the streets because the community wasn’t safe for police.

Shannon added that another positive thing to come out of the riots was the ouster of then-Police Chief Daryl Gates, who had ordered officers not to confront violent protesters for several hours. Gates resigned from his post as chief on June 28, 1992.

“Some of these [USC] students have no clue about what things have changed,” said Corliss P. Bennett-McBride, director of the Center for Black and Cultural Student Affairs. “There have been some good things that came out of the riot, like the gang truce. And there were rebuilding efforts [for businesses],” she said.

At the event, community activist Najee Ali offered a sincere apology to Korean Americans for his hand in encouraging violent protests against business owners.

“We thought of Korean-Americans as our enemies,” he said. “If we had had more of a dialogue with our Korean brothers and sisters, this incident wouldn’t have happened.”

The panel also included USC Law Professor Jody Armour and Civil Rights Attorney Do Kim, who graduated from Harvard College in 1993 with a joint concentration in Afro-American Studies & Sociology.

“This whole thing was part of [Hurricane] Katrina and the crack plague because it’s part of the pattern of officials not helping the black community,” Armour said. “When you have concentrated disadvantaged [people] and inequality and alienation and hopelessness, you have a powder keg…Maybe the stage is set again.”

Kim said the events of 1992 go beyond race relations.

“Something like this can happen any time, because of economic disparity,” he said.

The conversation about the events of two decades ago continues at the Annenberg School of Communication & Journalism on April 19, 2012 at 7 p.m. in the Annenberg Auditorium. Journalists will address the questions: Riot? Rebellion? Or Civil Unrest? What is the Media Message?