I consume a lot of media on-line. In fact, were it not for the fact that I’m married to a Buckeye fan (who requires live sporting events) I’m pretty sure I could give up our monthly cable and not skip a beat. It’s not that I’m a television snob–I like plenty of television. It’s that technology has come to the point where I don’t need to watch anything (other than Buckeye football) when it airs. A big part of that are devices like the Apple TV, Boxee Box and Roku, all of which allow you to watch different kinds of content over the Internet on your TV.

My “ultimate” media box is almost here, and the Roku and Boxee both come close, yet fall just short. If they mated, we’d have a winner. Here’s what I’m after:

I want streaming media: Netflix and Hulu Plus are required, Amazon, Vudu, etc. are nice but not deal breakers.

It should be able to play any type of media I throw at it (within reason). For me, that’s primarily MPEG video, MP3 Audio, and JPEG Photos.

I need to not only get streaming services, I need to be able to browse my local files (I’ve digitized my entire CD library and I take a lot of home video).

The interface needs to be non-techie friendly, so other members of my household can use it without always needing my assistance.

So with those requirements in mind, here’s how the Roku and Boxee Box stack up.

It seems that a number of my tech friends own Roku’s (pronounced “Row Koo”) and I wanted a device to put on a second TV to get Netflix streaming, so I figured I would give the Roku a shot. The Roku is certainly the more affordable of the two. Models start at $59 and top out at $99. I purchased the XD/S. All of the Roku models have HDMI out for pumping video to HD televisions and they all come with a remote. I went with the XD/S because I wanted the dual-band wireless and the USB port (for convenience, mostly). If you don’t have a need for USB or the dual band, save the money and get the mid-range model.

Roku Media Player (XD/S)

The box itself is small and the build quality seems fine. It’s very unobtrusive in the small cabinet where my second TV sits. The remote functions fine and there is even a remote app for it to control the box from a smartphone which works well, too.

The Roku is based on a “Channel” model. So out of the box it has “Channels” configured for things like YouTube, etc. and you can then add Channels for the services you want to add. I had some issues getting the box to play nice with my wireless, but I’m not running your average home network, so I won’t go into details of that here. Suffice it to say that it took me about an hour to get it running, but it’s been very steady ever since.

What the Roku does, it does well. I’ve had good results streaming Hulu Plus and Netflix content. I also use it to get a Weather Underground feed. The interface isn’t the most beautiful in the world, it looks like it was designed by developers–not designers–but it’s functional and not confusing. I’d say it’s a very solid streaming performance and well worth the price.

Unfortunately, what the Roku doesn’t do is play local media. Well, that’s not entirely true. There is the USB port. However, there is not (currently) any good way to get access to my music, photos and videos that are stored on my NAS (Network Area Storage) box. That’s a *big* detractor for me, and why I wouldn’t use the Roku as my main media device. Part of the problem seems to be inherent to the device itself: it was clearly built for streaming, not downloading, and most local media doesn’t stream. This is a big drawback, though, and I think moving forward Roku will have to address this need, or they’ll end up failing to other boxes that serve it.

Next up is the Boxee Box. Boxee has been around for a while in the media game, making software that runs on your PC so it can act as a media center. I’ve used it on my Mac for a while and it’s really fantastic. The Boxee Box represents the first foray into the dedicated hardware arena for Boxee. It’s a small cube made by D-Link that runs the Boxee software. It’s pretty.

Boxee Box (by D-Link)

The overall build quality feels about the same as the Roku, but the similarities end there. It’s really a shame that the first Boxee Box is made by D-Link, because the hardware seems to be buggy as hell. The wireless card in it doesn’t support 5GHz (even though it was release in late 2010!) I had a *nightmare* of a time getting this box on the network. And I had problems updating the Boxee software on it as well. I eventually got it running and it seems stable, but it was a whole lot more effort for a nearly $200 box.

Fortunately, the other saving graces of the software make this box a winner. Boxee has clearly put more effort into user interface design, as the UI feels much slicker and looks much more refined than the Roku. The interface is gorgeous and really easy to use.

The Boxee does now support Netflix streaming, but it still doesn’t do Hulu Plus, which is a definite limitation for me, but Boxee has been in negotiation with Hulu and is *supposed* to be brining out Hulu support sometime soon. I hope that’s not just a rumor.

The Boxee Box is really outstanding when it comes to playing local media. It’s been able to play anything I’ve thrown at it. Music, videos, photos, all look great on it, and it all works without too much trouble. It even indexes movies (although it does so painfully slowly sometimes) and displays them with their cover art. Nice.

To me, there is no question that the Boxee Box is the more polished of the two devices, and it does everything it does quite well. If other hardware vendors get on the bandwagon and someone makes a slightly higher quality box, and they get their Hulu ducks in a row, the Boxee could be a device to be reckoned with.

The Verdict

Overall, both boxes do what they do well, they just do slightly different things. If all you care about is streaming Netflix movies and Hulu television shows, the Roku fits the bill. It’s affordable and it allows you to watch media from the net like a champ. If you’re like me, though, and it’s just as important (if not more so) to be able to watch your own media from your local network, it’s Boxee all the way.

For me, I’ll keep both for the time being. But once Boxee manages to offer Hulu streaming as well, I probably won’t have a need for the Roku anymore (unless Roku can make some big strides in the user interface and playing local media before then.) But I probably won’t buy another D-Link Boxee Box. I’ll either hold out for a better hardware vendor, or make my own small media PC.

1. The Opening Ceremony. Wow. I was floored, I honestly could care less that the “feet” fireworks we saw on television were CGI… they were a cool concept and looked great. But beyond that, there were the awesome drummers, the wrap around screen in the Bird’s Nest, and that completely cool “community” painting that was created at each stage. Oh, and the light up dudes. Oh, and the human version of the Bird’s Nest. And the “movable type” dance. Very impressive. Not to mention all the fireworks. I tend to think of Olympic ceremonies as hokey and boring, but China’s were the first Opening Ceremony that really impressed me. Really impressed me. China should be proud.

2. Volleyball. What the hell is with Beach Volleyball?? Seriously, what the hell? When did this become such a major sport? And couldn’t we have missed a few of the Misty-May/Walsh matches? And why was she always “Misty-May” instead of “May-Treanor”? Because it sounds cuter? Lame. Speaking of which, why do the women wear skimpy two-piece bikinis, while the guys are in baggy shorts and shirts? Either let the ladies cover up or make the guys play shirtless… in Speedos, I say.

3. Swimming. Who knew it could be so exciting! I didn’t.

4. Gymanstics. Um, if the age limit for the sport is supposed to be 16, shouldn’t they actually be 16? I’m actually saddened that the Chinese would do this… the games were such a triumph overall, it’s a shame they tarnished them with the whole under-age gymnast debacle. Speaking of debacles, Nastia Luikin deserved to share a gold with He Kexin–why can’t their be ties in the Olympics? Both girls were fantastic, they had identical scores, why not reward them both in the spirit of the Olympics? I call B.S. Speaking of B.S. what the hell is with the new scoring system??? They couldn’t split the difficulty level and subjective and still make it so a perfect score is a 10? *sigh* It’s like the people that run the sport of gymnastics have no damn clue.

5. The venues. Another shining moment for China. The Bird’s Nest is unique and impressive venue. And the Water Cube was very cool as well. Combined with the killer Opening Ceremony, the Chinese managed to create one of the most memorable Olympics in my lifetime before any of the athletes even began to compete.

6. The Closing Ceremony. Not as impressive… not even close. The dudes in bike helmets, playing giant Gouda drums wasn’t very spectacular. The monowheel bikes were cool, and the “memory tower” flame thing was pretty cool, too. But that Bejing song? The typical pablum I tend to expect from the Olympic ceremonies. I half expected to see Ewoks come out singing “Small World” or “Hakuna Matata”. Enough already. The Closing Ceremony had a couple of cool moments, but it was not the cohesive amazathon that the opening ceremony was.
But the worst was the London transition. Oh, London. London, London, London. Terrible. Leona Lewis and Jimmy Page, making fools of themselves on a crappy looking double-decker bus stage?? No wonder Robert Plant doesn’t want to tour with Page. _I_ wouldn’t tour with Page. London, you have _so_ much work to do before 2012 to not make fools of yourselves. _Not_ a very good start. I was embarrassed for London. First that god awful logo, then this. Then that horrible Michael Phelps thing. Does London _want_ to suck? Sure seems like it.