I don't think this is correct Latin. What you want is a "fear clause", which in Latin works counterintuitively. First off you must use "ut" or "nē" with the subjunctive. The counterintuitive part is that which one you use is the opposite of the one you might expect. For example, "timeō nē abeās" means "I fear that you will go away". If you imagine it as two sentences -- Timeō! Nē abeās! -- then you'll see why the opposite conjunction is used.

So I think what you want here is "timeō nē nēmō hoc videat". (Also possibly "timeō ut quisquam hoc videat", but I'm not as sure about that.)

You also misspelled "animadvertō" as "adimadvertō". I believe it comes from "animus" (mind) and "vertere" (turn), which should help you remember the correct spelling.

Perseus I was afraid no one would see it...but I will make my next post there. I'm working through the chapters of LLPSI and posting at the end of each a series of questions all at once....and usually they're answered by some of the more expert members. Do you recommend that I should post such questions there instead?

If a user find a post somewhere that he knows the answer, they would join to the forum to answer it (myself this is how I join to new forums). Now, the user base is almost empty because there is no post yet, so if you post something there, and a user will see it and find the post interesting, they join to talk to you about your post and this is how a forum user base grows up. So I think someine will join and reply you soon there, if they find a post there (i.e. your post.)So you are very welcome to join and post there with no worries about current user base. As you know each great discussion needs a starter, and if you don't start the topic, nobody will answer you. This is why I believe it worth your time to post there.

User base is still weak because: 1. It is just 3-days old. 2. There is no starter yet.But after answering you the post above, I did check my awstat and this is number of visitors since 2 Jan.02 Jan 2011 319003 Jan 2011 69204 Jan 2011 2383 Total: 6265

I believe this is a great stat for a just 3-days old forum. So If you start something I believe one of these 6265 visitors will sign up to answer you.

What do you mean by 'partis nomini adjunctum' It does agree with 'parte', right? Why does Orberg give it in the vocabulary as 'prior, -um' as opposed to 'prior - ius' ? - Isn't '-um' just the plural possessive ending..??!!

I translate the sentence as: 'This letter contains no praise; nor, indeed, does a lazy and bad boy deserve praise'. I don't see the ablative of instrument - unless I'm mistranslating continetur and it means something like 'No praise is offered by this letter'??? Is that it?