Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Not only no siblings, but no aunts, uncles, cousins, eventually anyway.

My brother married a Chinese girl and she said in China 6 adults take care of one baby, the parents and grandparents. She’s pretty in awe that I have 3, ha. Of course that is going to have a hugely different physological effect.

Of course the “findings” from this so-called propaganda farce of a “study” would apply exactly the same to only children in ‘Merka and Europe…

Couples who only have one child are certainly more laudable than the parasites who think it is their civic/religious duty to spam the taxpayers and the planet with as many of their cockroachlike offspring as possible.

Couples who only have one child are certainly more laudable than the parasites who think it is their civic/religious duty to spam the taxpayers and the planet with as many of their cockroachlike offspring as possible.

Daikokuco on January 15, 2013 at 9:46 PM

If we were to turn off the valve at the source by no longer funding reproduction, so many problems would vanish. Though we’d have culture-wide shock as women suddenly found they had to care for themselves or find a mate instead of rely on Uncle Sugar.

Everyone here but the trolls knows that when you subsidize something you get more of it, right? Can I assume that much? Than is it any surprise that when we subsidize reproduction for the poor and stupid, we get more poor and stupid people?

How about unmarried mothers with illegitimate children being considered LAST for welfare instead of FIRST, and d@mn to hell any liberal who bawls about how cruel we are.