Basically I want to know if the following three characters are the same

character A
health 10
strength 3
defence 2

character B
health 100
strength 30
defence 20

character C
health 1000
strength 300
defence 200

In traditional RPG games health/mana ranges from 0-9999 and the other stats are 0-999, is this just a tradition or is there a mechanical reason for it?

What would be the pros and cons of using each character above as the base model if there are any differences.
I am think is all aspects so what affect it will have on battle maths, player perception, game balance.

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

4

You have given us some numbers asking how they will affect complex game mechanics without giving them too. There's no way to tell.
–
user1306322Mar 20 '13 at 17:03

As for the second part, big numbers seem appealing to a large audience of gamers, but numbers too big can get out of control. Imagine a character with 283413 HP, weapon dealing 81654 Dmg and so on. Or a character with 7 HP and a potion restoring 2 HP. Kinda reminds of a while back.
–
user1306322Mar 20 '13 at 17:09

I dont have any complex mechanic yet, this is to help design them. I was talking in general what affect do different ranges of numbers have on game mechanics.
–
SkeithMar 20 '13 at 17:20

3

I think this could be a good question but right now you're asking what's the meaning behind a bunch of arbitrary numbers.
–
TonyMar 20 '13 at 18:34

2 Answers
2

Generally speaking, this comes from a number of different factors, both technical and psychological.

For one, early RPGs had technical limitations imposed on them as to the number of differentiable values, especially in the era of 8-bit and 16-bit processors in game consoles. The maximum range of 8-bit integer values is 0-255, and for 16-bit integers, 0-65535. (In addition, I won't even go into how difficult it would have been on early platforms to represent decimal values.) This left a very limited range of relevant values for game designers to work with, so they (mostly) chose ranges which allowed decent levels of differentiation and gameplay balance, allowing for probabilistic and stat-based strategies to be created (think Pokemon's damage system), while still being within the ranges allowed by the processor.

In the above comment, the concept of aesthetically-pleasing numeric values is touched upon. These numbers are easy for us as humans to grasp, since they avoid what I like to call "zero shock" and "decimal/fraction shock". They are integers, which means we don't have to deal with differing scales or having to interpret decimals mentally, but they don't have an excess of wasteful information (extra zeros), which is not relevant to quantifying the importance of the value itself.

Actually, I'd make the argument that most early design considerations regarding RPG numbers were ported straight from D&D, Rifts, GURPS, et cetera. Early jRPGs and early cRPGs would cling very tightly to the stat-levels and the engine concepts from the pen and paper equivalents, and instead diverge in the aspect of gameplay, rather than the underlying engines. That doesn't make his question any more easy to answer, but I think the initial problem was dealing with numbers which could be interpreted by a human, on the fly, rather than a 16-bit register.
–
NorguardMar 20 '13 at 18:51