the only guy I see with hate in his heart and a perma-scowl on his face is Barack "Vote for Revenge" Obama. Some on here are as blind to that as Fidel Castro supporters were blind to his true intentions back in 1958.

So much hatred in many of the posters here is telling and shows how ugly some of you people are.

God sakes man, swallow your pride for love of country, I know many of you voted for the first time for an idealistic young candidate. Unfortunately he was not so idealistic as he pretended, and much more partisan than he led us to believe.

Do newspaper endorsements mean what they used to? Maybe not. But Mitt Romney has over one hundred of them, which is an impressive feat for a Republican. However, Romney’s ability to convert editorial boards away from their decisions to endorse President Obama four years ago is truly impressive.

To date, twenty-eight large newspapers have decided to drop their endorsement record with President Obama and put their chips all in on Romney. The blunt explanations for their decisions often gives way to some blistering critiques of the president, leaving the reader no doubt why these papers lost their faith over the last four years.

Obama not helping those in Libya was for political reasons. More important to look like the middle east is behind us rather than showing the hatred is still growing and we were attacked by terrorist on the anniversary of 9/11.

Obama has absolutely zero job experience. He has never held down a job outside of politics, which is a completely different animal from the real world. A man who can take a small business to an empire has 10,000x the experience of someone who is a professional at speechs and swaying votes.

Obama has absolutely zero job experience. He has never held down a job outside of politics, which is a completely different animal from the real world. A man who can take a small business to an empire has 10,000x the experience of someone who is a professional at speechs and swaying votes.

Obama was a lawyer, law teacher at U of C, and a Senator prior to the presidency. That very much affects the real world. You're making stuff up.

12 pages of reading and my head hurts. None of these arguments make me want to make me vote for either party. Everything is all POV. What is good for side is not going to be good for the other so there will never be a solution for the entire nation? How could there be?

Here's my solution. We elect both a Democrat and Republican as presidents and nothing gets passed until they both agree. This way both parties are to blame. HAHAHA! Nothing would ever get done!

Driverman said it perfectly. Everyone keeps blaming Obama for not fixing everything in 4 years. Usually less educated people have this view. They fail to realize the extend of the mess he inherited and just how well he handled the situation. Bottom line is we are much better off now than we were in 2008. And if Obama get reelected, we will be much better off in 2016 than we are now.

OBAMA FTW.

Reagan inherited a far worse economy than obama. Unemployment was higher, gas was literally being rationed. And in 3.5 years he turned it all around. We have 5 million fewer women working now than when obama took office. Minority unemployment has shot through the roof. He doubled our debt when he said he would cut it in half. Obama had the house and senate controlled for his first 2 years which is a rare advantage. I hate to say it...I really wanted him to succeed. But Obama failed. Miserably.