Anyway, my solution is wrong, again. I shouldn’t read a book while listining to mister Toeplitz’s music AND keep an eye on the list and try to answer questions. Just forget my previous posts, I wish I could remove them from the archives. I hope things will be better tomorrow. :-)

Unfortunately the most obvious solution wouldnt work in my case as the command length was being used along with renumber and therefore three coll objects were required in the end in order for it to work…

Rhys Perkins wrote:
> Unfortunately the most obvious solution wouldnt work in my case as
> the command length was being used along with renumber and therefore
> three coll objects were required in the end in order for it to
> work…

no matter how many colls you need, the most obvious solution is always
to pass the information just to all of them. You would only need several
colls if they have the same content, but differently ordered, elswise
the most obvious solution is to name the colls (with the same name),
then you can access the content at 1000 different places…

To boil it down, there is no need to copy the coll for what you wanted
to do. (To be honest, the last patch didn’t explain to me, what you are
after, at first sight I’d say, replace all the delays with a proper
trigger structure…)