05/08/2011

Over the years I have been questioning the legal existence of AWINZ , I found it incredible that the so called CEO of this non existent law enforcement authority was one and the same person as the manager of dog and stock control Waitakere city council.

I have this week established that the Waitakere city dog and stock control unit run a programme for the adoption of cats.

Under the official information act please advise

1. Under which act and section this “service “ is facilitated.reply

From previous correspondence with Waitakere City Council you will be aware that prior to 30 June 2003 the council’s animal activities were undertaken in accordance with specific legal advice from Matthew Casey, which have previously been provided to you and that since 1 July 2003 the council has had powers of general competence under section 12(2) of the Local Government Act 2002 (2).

12 Status and powers

(1) A local authority is a body corporate with perpetual succession.

(2) For the purposes of performing its role, a local authority has—

(a) full capacity to carry on or undertake any activity or business, do any act, or enter into any transaction; and

(b) for the purposes of paragraph (a), full rights, powers, and privileges.

2. What consideration has been given to this function being Ultra Vires for council reply See above

3. How is the cattery funded reply The cattery is funded by both rates and by revenue from adoption fees.

Approximately 60% from rates and 40% from revenue. Some of the labour contribution is on a voluntary basis

4. Who pays the staff looking after the cats. reply The council

I have also Linked a newspaper item and raise questions with regards to the prosecutions undertaken by the council under the animal welfare act

What funds did the council ( Waitakere ) receive for prosecutions under the animal welfare act – reply None

How many prosecutions were there – reply None

Under which act and section was the council able to prosecute. –reply Not applicable

How did the animal welfare unit obtain the delegated authority – reply Not applicable

When did the animal welfare unit apply to council to act outside the scope of their local government duty and when was it passed though council. – reply Not applicable

additional comment from council From your correspondence with Waitakere City Council, and Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, over the years you will be aware that Waitakere City Council was never authorised by MAF to undertake prosecutions under the Animal Welfare Act The statement to the contrary in the press release referred to in your email was wrong.

The question just has to be how can a press release from the council be so wrong???

Advertisements

Comments Off on council gets press release wrong !

25/06/2011

Today’s headlines are of Mr Patrick O’Brien who since 2007 has been trying to address Justice by confessing to perjury see todays herald article . In 2008 Police hired Wellington lawyer Bruce Squire, QC, to investigate the allegations independently.

Mr Squire finished his inquiry and sent his report to the police, but would not comment on his conclusions.

He said the report was sent to police more than a year ago…

Now if this guy is having so much trouble confessing what would it be like if you tried to report Perjury or corruption… well I can tell you that you are pushing it up hill and the offender has a much better chance of taking you to court than you reporting the corrupt practices.. I know because I have tried.

And that is how new Zealand gets to be the least corrupt.. the wheels turn very very slowly , I think we are still processing 1948 .

In the intervening time the ombudsmen sit in their 10 storey building which incidentally used to be a ground floor office but now site entirely on top of the mountain of complaints, Mr Obrien’s ombudsmen’s page reflects my view of the efficiency of the ombudsmen’s office.

And in the mean time the power of the blue uniform still prevails in court , any thin a cop says is truth .

The same effect is had by having letters behind your name apparently a university degree makes you honest and trust worthy.

Imaging jack the ripper.. Now look what a few extra letters do

Jack the ripper MD .. must be a respectable mortician ,

and jack the ripper LLB well he must be a reputable lawyer who slays his opponents.

So instead of sending our criminals to prison we should send them to university or put them in a blue uniform and they will become honest and reputable citizens overnight.

Its time NZ got real make cops , lawyers and anyone else for that matter accountable to the truth.. if we cannot have truth in our courts then we cannot have justice.

But in the least ( perceived ) corrupt country in the world it is important to keep our stats in line to preserve the pretence.

Comments Off on When there is no accountability for perjury what expectation is there of truth?

09/06/2011

When we look at the commercial landscape of new Zealand it soon becomes evident that the very few peaks are occupied by a handful of men who all appear to be inter connected one way or another.

The other observation is that many of these persons did not get to the top using their own resources but did so while trampling a hard working Kiwi in to the ground.

Morals , values ,ethics and truth have nothing to do with it appears that it’s all fair in commerce and that includes matters which are considered illegal in other countries.

However in New Zealand the luxury of using the court to obtain what you want exists and in using the court you have the added benefit of financially stripping your opponent to ensure the takeover is swift and painless.. that is painless for those occupying the peak not so for the poor sod who is driven into the ground.

Truth is also easily avoided because there consequences of telling lies in court is minimal as no one will take you to court for perjury as it simply is not economical especially if you are the one who can afford big gun lawyers and write it off as a business expense .

It is time that we sought accountability to the truth in our courts and ensured this by making it uneconomic for those straying from the truth to do so. Currently our legal system appears to favour those who can afford the courts and those who can afford the courts use it to financially strip their victims.

Perjury prosecutions are rare because basically they are uneconomic against those who can afford to defend them.

Culprits of this tactic are those who hide behind company names , only when you delve further do the real culprits come to light.

Take this judgement for example FRESH PREPARED LTD in paragraph 6 of this judgement it states “It is important to record that the shareholders in Beach Road Nominees were Messrs Terry Hay and David Nathan. And that “Hay owned Pacific Flight Catering”

In the judgement the judge goes on to say that fresh prepared Limited , (that is Terry Hay and David Nathan ) “apparently pursued a scorched earth policy, forcing all parties to incur legal costs on interlocutories far in excess of what, by any objective measure, was the very modest amount of its claim, which was well within the District Court’s jurisdiction.”

What stands out is that Terry Hay was acting in a capacity which was more than a shareholder, he was preparing GST returns which conflicted with the figures which the owner of the company had obtained. He also communicated with the bank and then he and David Nathan used a company for which they were directors ( salad foods Limited)to purchase the debenture from the ANZ just prior to it rolling over for another year and immediately place the company in receivership to recover these funds.

Had the debenture remained with the bank the loan would have been advanced to the company for a further 12 months and there would have been no financial pressure on the owner of the company.

The receivers were appointed and a legal battle began, Terry Hay is good at these he uses them to bankrupt people and then he retreats to Honolulu so that he can escape his accountability to our justice system when he is faced with a multitude of fraud charges( hay charges )

The decision was favourable for the original owner of the great Dessert company limited but they ran out of finance for the appeal and the liquidators stepped in as planned.

This is probably the cheapest way to take over a company there is no goodwill to pay and you can then continue to trade with the company as if never ceased to exist even take over the trade mark as though you are still the same company

Although I have no evidence that this is the case in this instance , I suspect that he operators of the Great dessert company are puppets just like Lynne Pryor was in fresh prepared Limited and Salad foods Limited .

Terry Hay has other people fronting his businesses for him. This was and still is the case for fresh prepared limited which has now morphed into Salad foods run and operated by convicted fraudster Lynne Pryor under supervision of her brother Graham Pryor who has moved from media to the food industry

The reason for using other people is that his reputation precedes him and there are those int eh airline industry who simply will not deal with him.

Pacific flight catering supply food for Air Pacific ,Cathay Pacific , Air Tahiti Nui , China Airlines , China southern , Thai air lines and have just lost the contract to Malaysia Airlines

I should add that the original owner of the Great dessert company a very accomplished pastry Chef is no longer with us, the stress brought on cancer which eventually claimed her life.. Well done Mr Nathan and Mr Hay looks in my opinion it looks like legalised theft and murder.

Comments Off on How the rich get richer

22/05/2011

Tony Molloy QC has hit the nail on the head, I hope Government sits up and takes note. the news item Law system a ‘laughing stock‘‎ grew out of the presentation he made to the conference I attended last week . He was the highlight of the conference in my view.

Truth , honesty and evidence play no part in our court process and lawyers who are prepared to tell lies rule the day.

Court is all about strategy those with the most money and the most lawyers win no matter how weak their case is.

5 years ago I questioned the lack of existence of an animal welfare law enforcement authority , it was to have been the perfect fraud .Court has been used successfully to prevent this from being exposed. Because the court was misled no authority will act on it .

How can the government give law enforcement ability to something which does not exist , why did they not check and why was the person who had a business plan for this venture able to write the legislation be employed as an adviser to the select committee and then apply for law enforcement ability in a fictitious name.

Why is still being covered up? Is it ignorance is it bad law or is our legal system and government corrupt ? or is it plain incompetence?

15/05/2011

In the paper today there is an article Schools arrange secret abortions the feed back was requested I wonder if they will include my response or will we allow schools and Councillors to make up their own law. my response is as follows

Under 16 year olds are not old enough to make decisions on their own and having to keep the secret of an abortion from their mother is massive.

In no other aspect does a person under 16 have the right to sign a contract ,they can’t get married get a loan drink without parents’ consent. Where is the exemption that says that they can when it comes to abortions?

If they had to have their appendix out they would have to have parental consent so why should the decision to terminate be any different, it is after all a surgical procedure one which carried its own risks.

Then when we get to the person who had sex with the girl .. and yes it still is an offence under the age of 16 we encourage silence there by making the councillor a party to the offence by covering up and enabling the offender to go out and destroy some more lives.

Consider the crimes act Section 134 Sexual conduct with young person under 16 carries a penalty of 10 years for this offence

Section 71 Accessory after the fact- (1) An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him, in order to enable him to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.

It is for this very reason that we have legislation why can these councillors make up their own rules? It is not up to the parents to demand a prosecution it is mandatory .

Does this mean that the privacy act over rides the crimes act ? I think not

No one ever considered the long term effects on the girl and the family by keeping it quite.

02/05/2011

Open letter to Wyn Hoadley councillor TCDC I have asked Wyn Hoadley to please explain why she a former mayor and now a councillor helped to cover up the fact that the council premises resources and staff were being used as a side line for the venture which she allowed her name to be used for. A venture which was private in nature and one which was a parasite off the public purse

Comments Off on Open letter to Wyn Hoadley

28/04/2011

On the Transpaency blog I am doing a daily post with the background to the litigation on the AWINZ matters there have been two posts so far each highlights the roles of the various players visit www.Transparency.net.nz to keep up to date.

21/03/2011

Kerre
I am most disappointed in your article about Ken Ring.
I am a private investigator and deal with facts I have also had the privilege of meeting Ken .

Ken is made out to be some kind of mystical Warlock who gazes into a crystal bowl and predicted an earthquake this is so untrue .

Ken lived in a campervan form many years and observed nature by living in it . He noted the tides connections with the moon and the weather and from there on connected many other things.

Rather than being taught in a university of a structure of how things work, Ken has been a free thinker and unconstrained by previous theories which limit scientists thinking .

He is not the one who took his findings of a higher than usual potential for earth quakes to the masses , that was done by the media .

To me it seem s incredible that he has been crucified over this when other more serious matters are ignored.

I spoke up about a law enforcement authority which did not exist – I was the one who was crucified .. where was the press to get that story out.. they have kept quite on that issue and it makes me believe that there is powerful manipulation going on in the back ground to ensure that the public only hears what the powers that be want to have them hear.

Ken is an incredible man great wisdom all learnt in the school of life , he is not a conformist and for that he needs to be punished just as I had to be punished for saying Hey its not right that the man who wrote legislation also enforces it.

The press have done huge damage to kens life and reputation and when I look at your comments they are far worse than what I said when I questioned corruption and was taken to court for defamation.

I had my defence denied and there was never a finding that I had spoken anything but the truth or my honest opinion , I was effectively sentenced without a trial or formal proof , it has cost me my marriage pulled my family apart, been more stressful than anything I have ever experienced and cost a huge amount of money .

I did nothing but speak the truth .

I realise that you may have given your opinion but your opinion was unfair to Ken and based on my experience he has the right to take you to court for defamation too and if he uses the same corrupt lawyers as were used against me then you don’t stand a chance .

I simply cant understand why the media has been so outspoken against him when persons who have misled the public so seriously as the person who I spoke up against are kept out of the lime light and their corrupt actions are seemingly condoned.

Ken has done no more than express his opinion from his experience.. he has been crucified for it.. and look he was right what if there had been a loss of life because those who do not understand his methods discredited him.

In the end Mother nature rules.. he did no more than interpret her signs.

I saw corruption and questioned it .. It would appear that the public are not entitled to protection .

What I suspect is that there is a lot more to this than meets the eye , I hope that I have not just been fibbed off I sincerely hope that the information is withheld so that they can conduct a proper investigation ..in my opinion it needs it.