lions are felines, true.
lions and cats evolved from reptiles or others, false.

there is something called to adapt with the environment. color/nature/habits may change with the climate and other reasons. but the animal will remain the same.

let's take an example:
you take care of a tiger in your house. and with time, she loses his stripes. she will look all orange and white. but she is still a tiger. she will give birth to tiger cubs and they will grow to be tigers. if they continue like that. after a hundred years they will always be tigers... you can call them cats or big cats. but they won't grow horns or wings.

mythological creatures play a lot with evolutionists minds. the likes of Minotaur and pegasus are behind all this evolution hoax..

You really don't have a fucking clue what evolution really is all about, do you?
Let me give you a hint, the ones who keep resorting to magic are the creationists.
Call it a hoax if you want to but so far all the evidence is in favor of it, not your stupid myth.

How does this person turn on his/her computer, get on the Internet, point a browser to a website, and type text? How? Windows is easy to use, but can it be THAT easy? This is some industrial strength stupid guys!

There is something called adapting to one's environment. Creotards have abjectly failed to do this. Their hair dye and polyester levels may change with their denomination, but the stupidity will remain the same.

Let's take an example:
You take care of FullWhiteMoon in your house, and over time she/he learns to sit upright and not to fling feces. But FWM is still a moron and will keep mouthing idiocies. If FWM lives for a hundred years she/he will still be a stranger to reason. You can call him/her human, but FWM still won't know an ass from an elbow.

Mythology plays a lot with creotard minds. Stories of talking snakes and flying telepathic zombies are behind all this creationism hoax.

"Lions are felines, true." Very nice of you to admit to this tricky, little known fact.

" color/nature/habits may change....but the animal will remain the same." Um, no. It can't change and still stay the same. Only god could do that, if he existed.

Take a tiger into your house and you will lose your head (literally - they are hungry carnivores, y'know) long before she loses her stripes - which will never happen.

Very astute of you, though, to understand that a mummy tiger gives birth to baby tigers and not to baby elephants or baby penguins. You should get a job teaching biology and zoology in Texas. It would be a step up for their education system, by the sounds of it.

PS Mythical creatures never evolved coz they never axisted. That's why they are mythical. Think of god, for example, and you will understand what I mean.

AHHHH YESSSSSSSSSSSSSs.....the old fundie creation science argument about "adaptation" instead of evolution.
To wit: "there is something called to adapt with the evironment. color/nature/habits may change with the climate and other reasons. but the animal will remain the same.

Oh REALLY????? Let's see how well that works. If you make a poodle a guard dog, will it turn into a german shepard? How about racing a chihuahua, will it "adapt" into a greyhound? If you put a pigeon into the water, will it "adapt" into a duck?

And... in case you didnt realize it ....evolutionists realize that "the like of Minotaur and gegasus" or mythologies. Evidently you think that believers in evolution think they are real. Shows how much you really truly understand about evolution. Notta.....

Oh crap, he's onto me. I indeed only agree with the theory of evolution because of coercion by a minotaur. If it weren't for the minotaur I would actually believe in god and creationism. But every time I start to believe in god the minotaur comes along and jabs me in the back with its horns, threatening to run me through with them. Damn you mINOTAUr, dAMN YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nope, Minotaurs and Pegasuses are completely against the theory of evolution, they are part of a religion mythology.

Lions and cats evolved from lion/cat-looking animals, who evolved from somewhat less lion/cat-looking animals, who evolved from even less lion/cat-looking animals, and so on. I highly doubt they evolved from reptiles.

So you're saying that even though the animal will change it will remain the same? What the fuck are you on about?

If a tiger was to 'lose' its stripes, that would mean that a genetic change/mutation had occurred and the animal has changed. Even though that particular mutation may not inhibit cross-breeding, it's still a mutation. That's called evolution, dumbass.