Stay Boggled. A bull# artist gets nothing done. Say what you want but the man has transformed the NYC skyline and has buildings, holdings and golf
Courses all over the world. He gets things done. Period. Obama, now he was a bull# artist to the max. He had all the people follow him for change and
we got more regulations, trillion dollar bailouts, higher healthcare,a transgender military and solidified the thinking of a generation of those who
feel the system owes them something. I will hand it to Barack he was DAMN good at what he did. However, what else has he actually accomplished outside
of the presidency? He is also no Nixon. Nixon was a lifer in politics. Lots of people forget he was Eisenhowers VP and lost to JFK in the 1960
election. All people know is the scandal. Hell, he was even re-elected before Watergate. He was a yes man. Look at the committees he was on and what
he helped pass. He is not Trump.

Do I agree 100% with Trump. Nope. No one should completely agree with the person in charge. Does he say things rather blunty? Yes, but who cares. I
want simple, honest and straight answers. That is not dumb. It is simply logical to have the right answer with the least amount of bs.

Tell me in 2-5 complete sentences what the world's most perfect leader would have said instead.

If you can't handle the assignment, you flunk this thread.

One that doesn't threaten nuclear apocalypse every time he opens his mouth on the topic of North Korea.

Perhaps something along the lines of:

'We recognise North Korea feels the presence of American military assets along their border is a clear and present danger to their continued
existence. In order to de-escalate the situation we propose creating a demilitarized corridor, and both sides will pull back their forces.'

I don't mean to be too flip or come off as rude, seriously. but isn't that called the DMZ?

Nobody wants innocents to die. But, nobody wants a crazy little Rocket Man to build a nuclear arsenal either to be at his disposal and whim. This is
one of those real conundrums. Do the lives of the many outweigh the lives of the few? If the NK people were capable of overthrowing this p.o.s.,
would they? They have been so cowered, brainwashed, starved and tortured to the point they dare not even think of it.

I do not remember him saying he wants to kill the citizens of the NK. In war there are casualties. He is putting his citizens in that position where
our leader is protecting us. Kim is putting his people in harms way and Trump is protecting his and still it is not enough.

His speech today was spot on. He called everyone out. It is about time that this happened on the world stage again. He did not make threats. He gave
guidelines and ground rules. He is against regime change and all about out country. How can people still not get behind that is beyond me.

Nobody wants innocents to die. But, nobody wants a crazy little Rocket Man to build a nuclear arsenal either to be at his disposal and whim. This is
one of those real conundrums. Do the lives of the many outweigh the lives of the few? If the NK people were capable of overthrowing this p.o.s.,
would they? They have been so cowered, brainwashed, starved and tortured to the point they dare not even think of it.

Is there truly no way, in this day and age, to take out a single leader, or those few who are in control of a country (any country, for that matter),
other than laying waste to the entire country and the innocent people therein?

Serious question (posed to everyone).

There has to be a way that is strategically probable, rather than a full-on war. But war is good for the state, seems to be the "easiest," and
those against whom we war are not us, and therefore don't matter as much as our own, hence acceptable collateral damage for the "good of the many
more."

originally posted by: fiverx313
i'm taking an informal poll... my gut feeling is that if you think 'rocket man' is a funny nickname, especially doubly funny to use in a speech to the
UN, you are over 55 years of age. y/n?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.