FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?BOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!SPREAD WORD TO YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY!

"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Sunday, November 13, 2016

North Korea is an Pentagon Vassal State

If it weren’t for the fact that he is absolute dictator of a
country with a formidable army and nuclear missile technology, North
Korean President Kim Jong Un, the 290 pound, 32 year-old ruler would be a
clown figure. Unfortunately for world peace, Kim Jong Un, while he is
playing games with his rockets and threats of war, is serving the
long-term interests of the USA, especially the military industrial
complex, the Pentagon and State Department, whose priority increasingly
is to make an Asia Pivot of military power projection to contain and
isolate the Peoples’ Republic of China as well as Russia

In the end of the 1990’s I had the chance occasion to have a chat
with the late James R. Lilley. Lilley was at the Davos World Economic
Forum and by chance had sat at my dinner table together with a
delegation from the China Peoples’ Liberation Army. As I was the only
westerner at the table he struck up a conversation, and as he saw I was
more than conversant in global politics, he began talking, perhaps more
than he should have with one he did not know.
James R. Lilley was no outsider. A member, together with his close
friend, George H.W. Bush, of the infamous Yale University Skull &
Bones secret society, Lilley served some three decades at the CIA along
with Bush. Both Lilley and Bush were US Ambassadors to China.
Lilley’s term in Beijing coincided with the May-June 1989 Tiananmen
Square student protests. I have reason to believe he played the key US
role in orchestrating that clash between thousands of protesting
students and the Chinese government as one of Washington’s early Color
Revolution attempts to destabilize communist China simultaneously with
the CIA’s role in destabilizing the Soviet Union.
At the time of Tiananmen protests, the man who developed the
handbook for color revolutions, Gene Sharp, of the Albert Einstein
Institute, was in Beijing until the Chinese told him to leave, and
George Soros’ Chinese NGO, the Fund for the Reform and Opening of China,
after Tiananmen, was banned when Chinese security services found that
the fund had links to the CIA.
This background is important to better situate who Lilley was – a
consummate insider of the George Bush CIA “deep state” networks that try
to remake the world to their liking. In our Davos talk, Lilley told me
he had been furious at President G.H.W. Bush in the aftermath of
Tiananmen for refusing to make a stronger denunciation of the Beijing
government, that, for a massacre that he knew never took place.
In the event, in our Davos discussion we touched on events in Asia
and the ongoing focus by Washington on North Korea’s nuclear program.
Unexpectedly, Lilley made a remarkable statement to me. He said, “Simply
put, at the end of the Cold War, if North Korea didn’t exist we would
have to create it as an excuse to keep the Seventh Fleet in the region.”
Shortly before our Davos discussion North Korea had launched a missile
over Japan, causing huge anxieties across Asia.

What is Kim Jong Un?

Who or better said, what is Kim Jong Un? Since the death of his
father in 2011 Kim Jong Un has consolidated power as absolute dictator.
In December 2011 Kim became Supreme Commander of the Korean People’s
Army. His earlier history has been carefully hidden. It has been
verified that he attended school in Europe at Liebefeld Steinhölzli
school in Köniz near Bern. Accounts say he lived in Switzerland, under a
false name, from 1991 until 2000.
There he reportedly developed a prodigious taste for French Bordeaux
wines, Yves St Laurent cigarettes, Swiss Emmenthaler cheese and luxury
Mercedes autos according to Kim Jong-il’s former personal chef, Kenji
Fujimoto.
While Kim’s extensive stay in Europe might or might not have been
the opportunity for US intelligence to nurture some kind of contact,
Kim’s deeds since taking control have been a godsend to the US role in
disrupting Chinese as well as Russian relations with both North Korea
and with South Korea as well as with Japan.
One of Kim Jong Un’s earliest indications of a major shift in
foreign policy away from Beijing came when he ordered the arrest of his
uncle for treason in December, 2013. Jang Sung-taek had been
vice-chairman of the National Defence Commission, second only to that of
the Supreme Leader and was “key policy adviser” to the politically
inexperienced Kim Jong-un on the death of Kim’s father. More
importantly, Jang was well-known as China’s best friend in Pyongyang.
As Washington moved to implement its new Asia Pivot military
encirclement policies against China, removal of Beijing’s most
influential friend in North Korea would be very convenient, to put it
mildly.
Kim Jong Un not only had Jang executed, Jang’s wife, Kim Kyong-hui,
the only daughter of former North Korean supreme leader Kim Il-sung, the
only sister of former North Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-il and the
aunt of Kim Jong-un, a General in the army and Politburo member, was
reportedly poisoned on orders of Kim, though no confirmation has been
possible. What is known is that Kim ordered the systematic execution of
all other members of Jang’s family including children and grandchildren
of all close relatives. Those reportedly killed in Kim’s purge include
Jang’s sister Jang Kye-sun, her husband and ambassador to Cuba, Jon
Yong-jin, and Jang’s nephew and ambassador to Malaysia, Jang Yong-chol
as well as the nephew’s two sons. At the time of Jang’s removal, the Kim
regime announced, “the discovery and purge of the Jang group…made our
party and revolutionary ranks purer …”
Clearly, Kim Jong Un was just the kind of dictator Washington’s warhawks could “do business with.”

Kim’s War Threats

The timing and effect of Kim Jong Un’s bizarre threats to wage war
against South Korea and other states of the region, including Japan, as
well verbal threats to strike cities on the US West Coast since 2013,
fit too neatly into the geopolitical agenda of Washington, but not
against North Korea. The agenda of Washington was aimed rather against
China and the Russian Far East.
In March 2013, North Korea’s Kim, absurdly enough, threatened the
United States with a “pre-emptive nuclear attack”, and Kim Jong-un
issued a detailed threat to “wipe out” Baengnyeong Island, under United
Nations Command and South Korean control since the Korean War and scene
of previous naval clashes. Under Kim Jong Un, North Korea has boasted of
plans for conducting nuclear strikes on US cities, including Los
Angeles, and Washington, D.C. Military experts suggest the threats were
pure macho bravado and that Kim’s nuclear capabilities are bluff at
least at this stage. It had the effect of painting Washington as a major
enemy of Pyongyang, a useful cover for Washington however and creating
the backdrop for Washington to promote its Asian military expansion, in
fact aimed at both China and Russia, not Pyongyang.
It’s commonly believed that since the 1950’s Korean War, communist
North Korea has been a Beijing puppet regime. It’s true that China is
North Korea’s biggest trading partner, and main source of food, arms,
and energy. It has also helped sustain Kim Jong-un’s regime, and has
historically opposed harsh international sanctions on North Korea.
However, the relationship is anything but congenial for Beijing. Their
main concern is to keep their North Korea neighbor from exploding in
chaos.
While China does maintain certain influence and while China sees
North Korea as a buffer between it and the US-allied South Korea,
Beijing’s ability to influence the erratic Kim Jong Un seems to be
extremely limited, if at all, a significant change from earlier Kim
dynasty dictators. The one power to gain from Kim Jong Un’s bellicose
actions is the United States as geopolitical hegemon desiring to turn
Japan and especially South Korea against China.
In February of this year North Korea announced that it had fired a
long-range rocket in violation of a UN Security Council resolution that
was voted with approval of both China and Russia. The rocket firing was
immediately condemned by Japan, South Korea and the US. Most notably,
right after the North Korean rocket firing, the Seoul South Korea
government entered serious talks for acquiring Washington’s THAAD
missile defense system, arguing it was to counter the threat from the
north. China protested loudly.
At the same time Japan increased its THAAD infrastructure
installations from the US. Both deployments were aimed not at North
Korea, whose missile threat to South Korea is ruled out. They were aimed
at goosing up the governments of South Korea and of Shinzo Abe in Japan
in their development of anti-China postures. Only months earlier,
relations between South Korea and Japan were chilly and China was making
peaceful economic overtures to South Korea. The Seoul decision to
accept THAAD missiles has chilled those ties.

Russia Also Loses

China is not the only strategic loser in the latest nuclear tests
and rocket firing provocations of Kim Jong Un. Russia, which has had
largely positive relations with North Korea going back to the Cold War,
has undergone a major loss of influence owing to very tough UN Security
Council economic sanctions passed in March, 2016 in response to Kim’s
latest military provocations. Russia agreed to the UN sanctions, but
quite reluctantly, as did China.
Moscow stands to lose major economic deals and influence as a result
in North Korea. More importantly, those deals, denominated not in
dollars but in rubles, will also be prohibited by the financial
sanctions. The Security Council resolution, drafted by the United
States, will also scotch plans for a new financial clearing house to
facilitate transactions between the Russia and North Korea.
Further, the US-drafted economic sanctions target very precisely
Russian-North Korean economic projects. It severely restricts North
Korean mineral exports–explicitly of coal, iron and iron ore, gold,
titanium, vanadium, and rare earth minerals–which were to be used to pay
for the Russian investments and projects that included Russian electric
power stations and metallurgic plants. Russia had planned to re-export
the North Korean coal and finance Russian rebuilding of a rail link
between North Korea’s Rajin port and Russia’s Khasan.
In November, 2013, before Washington launched its Ukraine coup d’
etat, otherwise known as Euromaidan, to split Russia from the European
Union, Russia, North Korea and South Korea had signed a Memorandum of
Understanding during a visit of Russian President Putin to Seoul. That
agreement would also include South Korea in a further restoration of the
entire Trans-Korean Railway, a major positive development towards
stabilizing relations between the two Koreas.
At this point it clearly is the case that under the erratic
32-year-old Swiss-educated Kim Jong Un, Washington has found the perfect
boogie man to scare South Korea and Japan into embracing Washington’s
agenda to maximize pressure, military as well as economic, against
Russia and against China. James R. Lilley’s Davos remark to me is borne
out by the recent militaristic and foreign policy actions of North
Korean Supreme Commander, Jim Jong Un. It seems it wasn’t even necessary
for the United States to “create North Korea.” Washington only had to
cultivate the infantile personality of Kim Jong Un.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he
holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a
best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online
magazine
“New Eastern Outlook”

TRADCATKNIGHT VIDEOS!

TCK Youtube Channel

TRADCATKNIGHT- TOP 3 CATHOLIC YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Archbishop Lefebvre

“This Second Vatican Council Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.”

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Archbishop Lefebvre

“And we have the precise conviction that this new rite of Mass expresses a new faith, a faith which is not ours, a faith which is not the Catholic Faith. This New Mass is a symbol, is an expression, is an image of a new faith, of a Modernist faith. ….Now it is evident that the new rite, if I may say so, supposes another conception of the Catholic religion-another religion.”

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON TUMBLR!

TCK Facebook

FOLLOW TRADCATKNIGHT ON PINTEREST

Archbishop Lefebvre

That Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church, because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship, all already condemned by the Church in many a document, official and definitive.... The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church...

Fr. Hesse Summary on Vatican II

Vatican II = Heretical & Schismatic

Exposing Vatican II & New Mass, Fr. Villa

Archbishop Lefebvre

“Well, we are not of this religion. We do not accept this new religion. We are of the religion of all time; we are of the Catholic religion. We are not of this 'universal religion' as they call it today-this is not the Catholic religion any more. We are not of this Liberal, Modernist religion which has its own worship, its own priests, its own faith, its own catechisms, its own Bible, the 'ecumenical Bible'-these things we do not accept."

Traditional Quotes & Prayers

The Real 3rd Secret of Fatima

Inlcudes Vatican II and the soon Apostate Church..."...because Fatima is a very apocalyptic message. It says that no matter what happens there are going to be terrible wars, there are going to be diseases, whole nations are going to be wiped out, there are going to be 3 days darkness, there are going to be epidemics that will wipe out whole nations overnight, parts of the earth will be washed away at sea and violent tornadoes and storms. It's not a nice message at all." Fr Malachi Martin

SSPX Marian Corps Donations

Marian Corps-Australasia

Fr. Chazal

Fr. Girouard

Or send a cheque made out to Fr. Patrick Girouard at : P.O.Box 1543, Aldergrove, BC, V4W 2V1, Canada.

St. Marcel Initiative

Or, if you prefer, in the U.S., make your contribution by telephone, toll free: 855-4-S. Marcel (855.476.2723), or internationally, by sending your donation directly to donations@stmarcelinitiative.com via PayPal.

TCK TESTIMONIALS

Eric Gajewski, Founder of DefeatModernism(formerly known as Defeat the Heresies)

Resistance Forum

True Traditionalist Forum

Pope XII: “Suicide Of Altering the Faith In Her Liturgy…..”

"I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past."A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, 'Where have they taken Him?'"

ALEXA RANK

Find The Rank Of Any Website

Current Crusaders Online Worldwide (RealTime)

St. Bernard:

Go forth confidently then, you knights, and repel the foes of the cross of Christ with a stalwart heart. Know that neither death nor life can separate you from the love of God which is in Jesus Christ, and in every peril repeat, "Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's." What a glory to return in victory from such a battle! How blessed to die there as a martyr! Rejoice, brave athlete, if you live and conquer in the Lord; but glory and exult even more if you die and join your Lord. Life indeed is a fruitful thing and victory is glorious, but a holy death is more important than either. If they are blessed who die in the Lord, how much more are they who die for the Lord!

How secure, I say, is life when death is anticipated without fear; or rather when it is desired with feeling and embraced with reverence! How holy and secure this knighthood and how entirely free of the double risk run by those men who fight not for Christ! Whenever you go forth, O worldly warrior, you must fear lest the bodily death of your foe should mean your own spiritual death, or lest perhaps your body and soul together should be slain by him.

Indeed, danger or victory for a Christian depends on the dispositions of his heart and not on the fortunes of war. If he fights for a good reason, the issue of his fight can never be evil; and likewise the results can never be considered good if the reason were evil and the intentions perverse. If you happen to be killed while you are seeking only to kill another, you die a murderer. If you succeed, and by your will to overcome and to conquer you perchance kill a man, you live a murderer. Now it will not do to be a murderer, living or dead, victorious or vanquished. What an unhappy victory--to have conquered a man while yielding to vice, and to indulge in an empty glory at his fall when wrath and pride have gotten the better of you!

But what of those who kill neither in the heat of revenge nor in the swelling of pride, but simply in order to save themselves? Even this sort of victory I would not call good, since bodily death is really a lesser evil than spiritual death. The soul need not die when the body does. No, it is the soul which sins that shall die.

The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently, for he serves Christ when he strikes, and serves himself when he falls. Neither does he bear the sword in vain, for he is God's minister, for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of the good. If he kills an evildoer, he is not a mankiller, but, if I may so put it, a killer of evil. He is evidently the avenger of Christ towards evildoers and he is rightly considered a defender of Christians. Should he be killed himself, we know that he has not perished, but has come safely into port.

Once he finds himself in the thick of battle, this knight sets aside his previous gentleness, as if to say, "Do I not hate those who hate you, O Lord; am I not disgusted with your enemies?" These men at once fall violently upon the foe, regarding them as so many sheep. No matter how outnumbered they are, they never regard these as fierce barbarians or as awe-inspiring hordes. Nor do they presume on their own strength, but trust in the Lord of armies to grant them the victory.

.

.

Saint Athanasius

"May God console you! ... What saddens you ... is the fact that others have occupied the churches by violence, while during this time you are on the outside. It is a fact that they have the premises – but you have the Apostolic Faith. They can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Faith. You remain outside the places of worship, but the Faith dwells within you. Let us consider: what is more important, the place or the Faith?The true Faith, obviously. Who has lost and who has won in the struggle – the one who keeps the premises or the one who keeps the Faith? True, the premises are good when the Apostolic Faith is preached there; they are holy if everything takes place there in a holy way ..."You are the ones who are happy; you who remain within the Church by your Faith, who hold firmly to the foundations of the Faith which has come down to you from Apostolic Tradition. And if an execrable jealousy has tried to shake it on a number of occasions, it has not succeeded. They are the ones who have broken away from it in the present crisis. No one, ever, will prevail against your Faith, beloved Brothers. And we believe that God will give us our churches back some day. "Thus, the more violently they try to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate themselves from the Church. They claim that they represent the Church; but in reality, they are the ones who are expelling themselves from it and going astray. Even if Catholics faithful to Tradition are reduced to a handful, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ."