Vigilantism is rarely the wise choice mainly because its punishment for assumed wrongs. The article stated "she believed" he did the crime but unless she actually saw it happen then its assumption and by no mean enough to enact revenge. If she did see it happen she should have stopped or reported it not try to lop off his ding dong.

Guess someone watched "Prisoners" and thought attacking strangers due to suspected molestation, without any evidence, was a good idea.

Most folks aren't bright enough or centered enough to handle vengeance for actual crimes, never mind commit vigilante justice for crimes perceived only in their own heads. Why in the hell are we somehow encouraging such actions?

FormlessOne:Guess someone watched "Prisoners" and thought attacking strangers due to suspected molestation, without any evidence, was a good idea.

Most folks aren't bright enough or centered enough to handle vengeance for actual crimes, never mind commit vigilante justice for crimes perceived only in their own heads. Why in the hell are we somehow encouraging such actions?

"He said she then told him to drop his pants so she could "cut his (expletive)". If he didn't comply, "she was going to have people hold him down and she would cut (his penis) all the way off,"

I'm tired, but she is referring to his dick in both quotes right? So, if they are willing to state "penis", what is the expletive for penis in the first quote that is considered offensive? Is there some penis version of "coont" of which I'm unaware? Inquiring minds want to know.

jimmyego:"He said she then told him to drop his pants so she could "cut his (expletive)". If he didn't comply, "she was going to have people hold him down and she would cut (his penis) all the way off,"

I'm tired, but she is referring to his dick in both quotes right? So, if they are willing to state "penis", what is the expletive for penis in the first quote that is considered offensive? Is there some penis version of "coont" of which I'm unaware? Inquiring minds want to know.

ZeroCorpse:I find it fascinating that Farkers are willfully ignoring that TFA made it clear that the woman was smoking weed and was stoned when she got the idea in her head and went to crazytown on this guy.

Don't tell me weed doesn't hurt anybody... It heightens paranoia, which is what happened in this case.

It's tough to sympathize with the guy, even though the accusations have not been proven, simply because of the nature of the accusation. This is why we need a court system that, all else being equal, prefers to err on the side of letting the guilty go free. This is not entirely fair, but the alternative is even less fair.

ZeroCorpse:I find it fascinating that Farkers are willfully ignoring that TFA made it clear that the woman was smoking weed and was stoned when she got the idea in her head and went to crazytown on this guy.

Don't tell me weed doesn't hurt anybody... It heightens paranoia, which is what happened in this case.