Having discovered that Markos C. Alberto Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA (MAMZ) a.k.a. "Kos" of DailyKos) has a long history of activism for the Republican Party and, furthermore, he trained and worked with the US CIA between 2001 and 2003, research has revealed and established the following, and therefore justice and history now bring this thirty-one count Indictment.

I think that MAMZ's CIA connections and his connections explain his startling rise to power better than any other hypothesis. Who benefits most of MAMZ is at the top of the heap in the "progressive" "left"? Well, the CIA would benefit the most, because the pseudo-left becomes completely by someone who has said that he would not have any problems working for the CIA today.

Listen to MAMZ's speach to the Commonwealth Club and notice the contradictions in his timeline. He says he was at the CIA for six months, but he also says he went their in 2001 and stayed until he joined Howard Dean's campaign in 2003/2004. Which means that he was probably at the CIA over one year and as much as two years, if anything he says can be believed at all. This also means that he was at the CIA when he was starting DailyKos, so may he started DailyKos under contract to the CIA. And maybe he continues to run it as a CIA front?

When you add that up with all of the lies about his family (See the Indictment of Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga by Justice and History), it certainly seems like MAMZ is an undercover operator in the American Left. That would explain how this "poor Salvadoran immigrant" from the Salvadoran oligarchy managed to put all of the connections together to build this media empire so quickly.

Laughably, people at his blog insist that it's a meritocracy, but apparently merit succeeds much more quickly with some help from the C.I.A.

Socrates, This blog maintains a link list that links to every blog that has cited the Truth About Kos a reference in its exposés about MAMZ. However, I cannot find any evidence that Brad Blog has ever cited the Truth About Kos as a reference, except for Bev. Harris' link in the comments.

Meanwhile, the most concise round-up of damning and discrediting information about MAMZ that I have seen anywhere is "The Indictment of Markos C.A. Moulitsas Zúñiga by Justice and History," here at the Truth About Kos Blog. It's packed with citations to government and industry documents based on original research not available anywhere else. It's just about four pages long, but it brings together all of the fatal inconsistencies and outright lies of the Markos Moulitsas story in one place. Eventually, it will inevitably become the basis of a mainstream media report about MAMZ. Don't miss it!

Hi Francis, thanks for letting me post. Yeah, it's probably best that you don't link to that BradBlog section. It's mentioned here now in the comments.

Brad Friedman finally seemed to wake up and fight back against Zuniga who has been a gatekeeper for election fraud. I thought it was ok for him and others to minimize the 9/11 stuff, as disinfo elements clearly could overrun a website. And I'm not saying there isn't a lot of shadiness with 9/11. One can go to my humble forum and see that I cover "weather mitigation," {or whispering here- chemtrails} which is considered a kooky, conspiracy theory.

Brad fought back because he was lumped in as a "conspiracy nutter."

The beauty of your work is that you have documented with facts who this Kos guy really is. A lot of us out here in the blogosphere have thought the internet has been overrun by fakes. All this used to be astroturfed well as more conspiracy type fodder. But then netvocates, rendon group emerged. There is something called the Bivings Group. There is an Advantage Consultants.

If a few years ago someone had said Kos was a CIA fake, they would have been laughed at. But now we know he really was in the CIA.

I wish I had time to write more here. And I kind of understand and respect your answer to my questions. Yes, the only way Kos rose to power was by some organised effort behind the scenes. Same perhaps with Huffington? The registered agents for the Democratic Underground are republicans. Now how does that add up?

So yes, people can do their own homework and connect dots and get a good idea about the Daily Kos.

My one question, why would Kos ever admit to all this? It seems like he has been his own worst enemy. Would all this have been figured out without that interview he did?

I Wish I had more time here, will check back when I can. I respect people like yourself who speak truth to power. These gatekeeper websites pick the wrong people to drive off of their mega-sites. We find ways to get the word out despite bannings or whatever.

Those who hate America and disdain the people are their own worse enemies. That was a foolish mistake by Kos. It really opened the floodgates to him losing complete credibility.

"Sure, I could always talk against racism, fight ignorance and prejudice wherever I ran into it, yet I would always be looking in from another room and I could always close the door. My life, in my world, in my own detached selfishness. And as I left the ugly reality of racism behind, it struck me that what was such an easy and trivial exercise for me would be impossible for anyone whose skin color or religious persuassion (sic) made them the target of bigotry and discrimination. THEY would never be able to escape who THEY were." (Emphasis added.)

"When they 'crash the gates', will they take our cross?"

"A candidate's religion continues to play a key role in shaping vote choice. Nearly four-in-ten (39%) say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who is Christian. Moreover, 63% say they would be less inclined to support a presidential candidate who does not believe in God – the most negative trait tested."

New online book says Kos family member is president of the Association of Salvadoran Hotels and president of the Salvadoran National Tourism Board. Moulitsas lied when he said his family is not wealthy or influential.

DailyKos' Demographics

If a Link Here Doesn't Work . . .

If a link doesn't work, be patient. Look for an updated link in the articles below, use the search function in the top left, and/or look to this list of all but one of the articles written by Markos C. A. Moulitsas Zúñiga (MAMZ) when he was at Northern Illinois University (NIU), writing extreme right-wing letters to the editor. Interestingly, the one known missing article still is not in the archives although it was faxed to me by Northern Star staff and republished here.
That article was the first in a series of five articles about "racism", four of which were assigned tasks and described the "racism" and religious persecution problems on campus based on interviews.

"And as I left the ugly reality of racism behind, it struck me that what was such an easy and trivial exercise for me would be impossible for anyone whose skin color or religious persuassion (sic) made them the target of bigotry and discrimination. They would never be able to escape who they were." (Emphasis added.)

Atty. Francis L. Holland in the Media

"Francis L. Holland, one of the vocal black bloggers, sent e-mails to DNC officials asking that 15 black-operated blogs be added to the State Corps. "There is nothing 'Democratic' about an all-white Democratic National Convention floor blogging corps," he wrote in an e-mail. Holland is also asking for the inclusion of 15 Latino-operated blogs."

"Or, as Obama supporter Francis L. Holland puts it: "So, it shows tremendous courage, foresight and solidarity that Edwards has endorsed Obama after the media declared Hillary's campaign to be as good as dead, right? Oh, well! Better late than never!"

"Of the blogs covering the convention, black blogs will be 7.2% of the blogs present,” says Francis L. Holland of the Afrosphere Action Coalition. According to Holland, many states with a strong black Democratic presence and population are either underrepresented or not represented at all, even though black bloggers from these states did apply. “The state of Tennessee, which often has over 25% blacks among its Democratic primary voters, will not have a single black blogger at the Democratic National Convention, for example. The District of Columbia, which is 60% black, will be left out. Louisiana, which is 32.4% black, will be left out. Illinois, the presidential nominee’s home state, which is 15% black, will be left out.”

In 2008, the Democratic "party came under fire from African American bloggers. Francis L. Holland of the Afrosphere Action Coalition, complained to Black Enterprise magazine that black blogs only made up slightly more than 7% of the bloggers credentialed for the convention."

"We are tired of Hillary Clinton telling America that we are less than American simply because we refuse to vote for her," said Francis L. Holland, an African American blogger." Ironically, the Clintons embraced us, and even embraced Pastor Jeremiah Wright for support during their impeachment scandal." Holland was speaking of the congressional trial that followed former president Bill Clinton's liaison with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. "She has forfeited the black vote for the foreseeable future with her color aroused appeals."

“November’s voter turnout depends on August’s blogger outreach,” said Mr. Holland of the Afrosphere Action Coalition., a member of a national and international black bloggers’ coalition called “The AfroSpear.” “Blogs address constituencies, and it simply is not possible for blogs that are all-white to effectively reach diverse Democratic constituencies.”

"Of the blogs covering the convention, black blogs will be 7.2% of the blogs present," says Francis L. Holland of the Afrosphere Action Coalition. According to Holland, many states with a strong black Democratic presence and population are either underrepresented or not represented at all, even though black bloggers from these states did apply. “The state of Tennessee, which often has over 25% blacks among its Democratic primary voters, will not have a single black blogger at the Democratic National Convention, for example. The District of Columbia, which is 60% black, will be left out. Louisiana, which is 32.4% black, will be left out. Illinois, the presidential nominee's home state, which is 15% black, will be left out."

"Francis Holland is a blogger from Afrospear, a national group of bloggers that advocates for African-Americans. When he looked at the list of State Bloggers, he saw no black blogs among them. Holland explains that the process the Democratic Convention planners used to choose the State Blogger Corps was bound to lead to this result. And he argues that the Democratic Party can scarcely afford to alienate black voters in this election year." (The original link no longer works, which is becoming a growing documentation problem on the Internet.)

"Electing Edwards to challenge the status quo is like supporting a queen to challenge the monarchy or integrating an all-white club by adding more all-white club members. It is possible that electing yet another white man to the Presidency will end the poverty of the historically disenfranchised, with John Edwards serving as a "pass through" for those who have historically been disincluded legally and by custom. But this is a very convoluted way of achieving what could be achieved much more directly by electing Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. ..."

Disclaimer:
Although I am a trained attorney, I am retired and am not an active member of any state Bar. Therefore, I advocate in all matters on my own behalf and not as the legal representative of any person, group or organization.