Primary Navigation

Response to a Personal Note:

Hi Een, I will post a response to the heart of what you have said, the issue of SK s use of the 2nd Power term, after I respond to your personal note. Some 30+

Message 1 of 1
, Oct 31, 2004

0 Attachment

Hi Een, I will post a response to the heart of what you have said, the
issue of SK's use of the 2nd Power term, after I respond to your
personal note. Some 30+ years ago, I picked up SK for the first time,
and that because I had begun to read literature in a search for
finding out if others had written about what I had had discovered
about myself. Essentially, I had stumbled into a self-change in which,
for want of a better way of putting it, something happened to the me
to whom things happened.

This engendered a process of self-clarification in which I tried to
come to an understanding of what seemed to be the breaking of an old
self and the positing of a new self, so to speak. When I reached a
level of understanding that I could understand, I began reading around
for others who spoke to that shift. That is how I discovered SK. I
found his words speaking at once to my understanding, regardless of
which book of his I picked up. I found him to be speaking to a
singular theme throughout. I bring this out because anything I say in
respect to what SK is saying is my reading of my self-understanding
through his words. I am saying, and this is why it is a personal note,
that my understanding of SK is grounded in my understanding of myself,
and thus is a projection thereof.

In other words, the assumption I work on is that he is talking about
what I know. Am I sure in this working assumption? All I can say is
that it seems to be the case. In that light, perhaps I can say that
his ideas in respect to the self-reference are decisive in that they
are also my ideas. Willy Brown

Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.