low latency

Basically because he's the only one that continues to develop patches.
Ingo's patches are for those that still use the 2.2.x kernels. Also it
seems that Andrews patches have better acceptance by the Linux development
community (read Linus & CO.), and some of his latencey enhancements have
been incorporated in the 2.4 kernel.
Rgds,
Delorenzo
adelorenzo at dinossauro.com
> On stardate Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:30:06 -0300
> Adolfo began the full scale invasion of earth with the following words:
>>> I haven't noticed any significant degradations to be quite honest on
>> any other area of the system. One of my intial fears with a low
>> latency patched
>> kernel was stability, which after a 92 day uptime was over (I had to
>> boot the machine in order to install a new kernel,patched by the
>> way.... :) ).
>>>> I suggest care when implementing a low latency patched kernel and
>> suggest you go for Anderw Morton's patches. And yes, compiling a
>> kernel can be achieved in less time with the patch.
>> Why Andrews, OOI?
>> I'm using the montavista patch.
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org> and put 'unsubscribe blfs-support' in the subject header of the message
--
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-support' in the subject header of the message