You have to look at the overall picture here. Would somebody who is seen, fairly or unfairly, as having questionable moral values by a lot of people really help the cause? The answer is, no, probably not.

Laws for sexual freedom are simple marking the way for more perverse behavior to be introduced into the mainstream. You joke about gay marriage leading to sex between a man and a turtle; however, there are men who actively seek out horses, furries, and whatever the flavor of the week is in Germany. This, with ever advancing ,medical technology, throws open the door to new, more abhorrent abominations. In the 1950s and 60s, white parents were alarmed when their teenage daughter brought a black boy home. That will be nothing compared to when she comes home with Uggla the tentacle monster and four sentient industrial egg-beaters.

Not exactly the worlds strongest proponent of MARRIAGE, and all that goes with it, including perfect fidelity to the mother of your children. If his argument is "marriage should be more worthless than ever" - i.e., completely disconnected from the capacity of men and women to make new people and the necessity of constraining that potential, I might believe him sincere, but not necessarily persuasive.

You have to look at the overall picture here. Would somebody who is seen, fairly or unfairly, as having questionable moral values by a lot of people really help the cause? The answer is, no, probably not.

Nothing is going to help until the passionate defenders of bigotry simple decide they're in the wrong. Seeing as how we still have anti-miscegnation supporters and open racists, I'm guessing sometime in the 2200s.

Legislatively and socially? Sometime over the next 30-40 years, it'll be legal nationwide.

You have to look at the overall picture here. Would somebody who is seen, fairly or unfairly, as having questionable moral values by a lot of people really help the cause? The answer is, no, probably not.

You should shoot him an e-mail and let him know that you have deemed his opinion on the matter worthless. Maybe there is still time to retract the article and issue an apology for expressing his views.

BillCo:I've heard that being a heterosexual is genetic and not a life style choice.

Sorry man, I'm proof that being gay isn't a "lifestyle choice". If I could CHOOSE to enjoy man sex, I would have a long time ago. I'd be covered in jizz like 24 hours a day. If I could just hang out with my dude friends and have them get me off, I'd be more than OK with it. The company of men is much more enjoyable for me.

It just doesn't work though. Boobs still make my junk happy, and wangs don't.

randomjsa:You have to look at the overall picture here. Would somebody who is seen, fairly or unfairly, as having questionable moral values by a lot of people really help the cause? The answer is, no, probably not.

From what I gather about the bulk of the people who care about gay marriage, the economy is the most important thing to them, and if that's the case Hef should be an absolute hero - he build a company from the ground up and employs a lot of people. He's a true businessman.

The friars were behind on their belfry payments, so they opened up a small florist shop to raise the funds. Since everyone liked to buy flowers from the men of God, the rival florist across town thought the competition was unfair. He asked the good fathers to close down, but they would not. He went back and begged the friars to close. They ignored him.

He asked his mother to go and ask the friars to get out of the business. They ignored her too.

So, the rival florist asked Hugh Hefner, who just happened to be one of his longstanding clients, if he could use his persuasive powers to get the friars to move into another line of work. Hef, being a good man, went down to talk to the men and managed to convince them that brewing beer was a much more logical choice for them.

Out of curiosity, I Googled "the world's most famous heterosexual. Apart from Fark.com and the Daily News article quoted, naming Hugh Hefner, the phrase seems to have attached itself to the oft-married beard, Elizabeth Taylor, whose wealthy male "friends" include the later Michael Jackson; motor-cycle rider, Malcolm Forbes; and any number of actors and rich men.

I'm sure that she would be glad to stand up and be counted for gay marriage, possibly more than once.

As for the "world's most famous heterosexual transvestite", I'm sure many Farkers would agree it is Eddie Izzard, and the world's most famous heterosexual tragedy is Romeo & Juliet by William Shakespear, while the WMFH porn star is Ron Jeremy, of course.

Other names mentioned in this context include Casanova (a no-brainer for the literary elite) and Australian cricketer, Shane Warne, whoever the Hell that is.

You know, this fame thing is really simple-minded and obvious, not unlike a Farker.

K3rmy:Laws for sexual freedom are simple marking the way for more perverse behavior to be introduced into the mainstream. You joke about gay marriage leading to sex between a man and a turtle; however, there are men who actively seek out horses, furries, and whatever the flavor of the week is in Germany. This, with ever advancing ,medical technology, throws open the door to new, more abhorrent abominations. In the 1950s and 60s, white parents were alarmed when their teenage daughter brought a black boy home. That will be nothing compared to when she comes home with Uggla the tentacle monster and four sentient industrial egg-beaters.

...And that affects you how? If'n ya like watching perverse behavior, go for it. There's no need to comment upon it for our sake.