Question of the Day

Does President Trump need to fire more Cabinet members?

WASHINGTON (AP) - Reaction to news that the U.N. will allow Iran to use its own inspectors to investigate a site it has been accused of using to develop nuclear arms. Iran is operating under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work, according to a document seen by The Associated Press:

___

“President Obama boasts his deal includes ‘unprecedented verification.’ He claims it’s not built on trust. But the administration’s briefings on these side deals have been totally insufficient - and it still isn’t clear whether anyone at the White House has seen the final documents.” - House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

___

“We must never allow Iran to become a nuclear weapons state. After a thorough review of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, I have concluded that diplomacy remains our best tool to secure a nuclear weapon-free Iran. … This agreement is far from perfect and carries risks. But I believe our negotiators achieved as much as they reasonably could, and that if strictly implemented, this plan can be effective.” - Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

___

“Even more unbelievable is that the administration would trust serial nuclear cheaters to conduct their own inspections and submit their own soil samples from their nuclear sites. That is like allowing a drug addict to submit his own specimen without any supervision.” - Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kan.

___

“This type of unorthodox agreement has never been done before by the IAEA and speaks to the great lengths our negotiators took to accommodate the Ayatollah despite repeated assurances from the administration that this deal is not based on trust.” - Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

___

“The more we learn about the Obama-Clinton Iran deal, the worse it gets. Allowing Iran to inspect its own alleged nuclear sites puts trust in a fanatical regime that’s cheated for decades and hates everything we stand for. This deal, and the secret side agreements that continue to emerge, jeopardize our safety and that of our closest allies.” - Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Republican presidential candidate.

___

“International inspections should be done by international inspectors. Period. The standard of ‘anywhere, anytime’ inspections - so critical to a viable agreement - has dropped to ‘when Iran wants, where Iran wants, on Iran’s terms.’” - Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

___

“Trusting Iran to inspect its own nuclear site and report to the U.N. in an open and transparent way is remarkably naïve and incredibly reckless. This revelation only reinforces the deep-seated concerns the American people have about the agreement.” - Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas.

___

“It is absolutely unacceptable, yet telling, that we are finding out the details of these agreements through The Associated Press. Even more unbelievable, after Iran spent years developing their nuclear capacity in secret while denying that they were doing so, we would now allow Iran to police these sites themselves.” - House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

___

“As the administration has said before - including in classified briefings for both chambers of Congress - we are confident in the agency’s technical plans for investigating the possible military dimensions of Iran’s former program, issues that in some cases date back more than a decade. Just as importantly, the IAEA is comfortable with arrangements, which are unique to the agency’s investigation of Iran’s historical activities. When it comes to monitoring Iran’s behavior going forward, the IAEA has separately developed the most robust inspection regime ever peacefully negotiated to ensure Iran’s current program remains exclusively peaceful, the overarching objective of the JCPOA. Beyond that, we are not going to comment on a purported draft IAEA document.” - White House National Security Council spokesman Ned Price.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.