Advertisements

To read more than 200 comments...

Click on the title of any post. It is a link to a separate page that shows all the comments. Scroll down to the bottom of the comments until you see the words newer and newest next to the number of comments on the right. Those words are links that will lead you to a new page of comments. :)

Remember when MM was "dating" Alex Soros, son of George? And they went together to that crazy Hamptons party hosted by the spirit cooking nut "artist" where guests ate desserts shaped like dead naked bodies? And how Alex told us on Instagram, dressed in his red shoes and standing next to MM, how excited he was to "dine in hell"?

IMHO she’s smart, beautiful, poised and driven. Any “whoring” only makes her more equipped to successfully navigate life within The Firm. This is what a modern fairytale looks like...happy couple. The more traditional fairytale setup with virgin Diana is a cautionary tale for the ages.

There maybe isn't racism in this blind itself, but if you read comments on other media sources, there is a lot of it. Some of it is overt, others are most subtle -- about how Harry should have stayed with a blonde (meaning Caucasian) or how whatever-ex was such an "English Rose" (again meaning Caucasian) and Harry should have stayed with her instead.

Don't be preposterous. My sons are also documented direct descendants of Mohammed, and there's a pretty good chance you are his descendant, too, as are millions of Americans, Europeans, and Middle Easterners.

MM may not be the ideal partner for such a public figure (for reasons other than her race) but Harry's always had pretty bad taste in women. He goes for party-girl/good-time girl types, none of which would have been an ideal partner for someone with level of public scrutiny.

Bingo. I think she will handle life under a microscope well because she loves the attention. MM gives me such an inauthentic vibe. She seems to know the right things to say, who to say them to, hence her continued upward mobility in life thats gotten her to where she is now.

Sounds like another "Pretty Woman" story where the wealthy trick and the heart-of-gold hooker fall for each other. No way Harry doesn't know about her background. That's probably how they met.

Why do people still believe Harry isn't Charles' son? I guess it's the red hair that throws people off. Compare Harry's features with his granddad Prince Philip, especially in younger photos of Philip. They're blood.

Did she yacht? Probably. It's an open secret in Hollywood that this goes on. Now she's into a higher class of yachting. She's clearly marrying Harry for the money and fame. That's definitely no secret. So she's just yachted her way into the most famous royal family in the world. It's all very entertaining.

For all anyone knows she started out pay-for-play with him too, so he doesn't care. She solves a big problem for him. That being what he wants (women of color) versus what he is allowed to have (whites).

Who cares if she has a past this isn't the 1900s. The Windsors have been referred to as the 'Windsor Cartel'. The Queen has stocks and shares in the big companies that control the prices of our food and resources and have done since the days of the 'New world' (America) and the British Empire. She is one of the richest people in the world, these stocks will be passed on to her son when she dies and there are no questions raised even though she gets insider knowledge from her government, which is a trading advantage and technically illegal in the UK.

This is also a family that backed their son to 'groom' a young impressionable 19 year old virgin to enter an arranged marriage and produce heirs when he was in his 30s and had numerous mistresses. This was only 40 years ago but is something most western nations see as something abhorrent that only occurs in other cultures.

Good luck to Markle and Harry if they want to break with tradition. People talk about her 'fooling' him. If anything, it would be her being used to inject some life into an outdated institution and boost their public standing in current society. The Windsors as 'royals' are on borrowed time and they know it.

Honestly, she may kill off the horse genes once and for all. Would be nice to mix up their generic lot a bit. And, between tampon grandpa (for those of us old enough to recall those conversations, blech!) fergie and shade as fvck Andrew.. just to make a few. That family is the last one to be casting stones

We keep forgetting that MM lived in Hollywood so like a Trump/Arnold running for Governor etc etc she was never in an immaculate world but in one based on sex sells (not talking couching but actual sex appeal on screen, moves) and is utterly atypical from every other lifestyle or business. Actress have legit naked scenes and kiss folks other than their spouses. They shmooze and party as networking. Of course she has skeletons by the royal standards but I don't think it is as big of a consideration for Harry as we think. I'm sure has had an inkling of this and is just in love. because he isn't in life for King like his bro the scrutiny should and will be less. Look at his Uncle who was similar - dating Koo Stark, Fergie. And I do agree that the royal family could use a shake up in their genes. Modifying the line... MODERNIZING it too so it doesn't utterly die of disinterest. It had to evolve to survive. I just fear MM wants to be a royal more than she legit loves Harry is all which would be sad. Otherwise I wouldn't judge her or them for a damn thing.

Harry knows things, too much, one might imagine. They had to agree. Good luck to him I say, and to Ms Markle. Regarding her looks, I think she is very pretty, not beautiful in the conventional sense/opinion.

Kate K, you need to search the word “racism” and learn the definition. Later you can use it in a sentence that actually fits with the subject. Racism and prostitution are two completely different words.

Diana was a natural red head, especially in her late teens and then her colour turned mousey... The best beauty thing she ever did was go blonde. Harry came out looking like a Spencer, rather than Charles (thank goodness).... He has more chance of saving his hair.

Even James Hewitt has said Harry is not his and the timeline doesn't even match up to their relationship.

That's not Meghan with Soro's son. It doesn't even look like her. Some Trump trolls were pushing this on Twitter a few months ago and got debunked instantly. I see it's made its way over here.

As for this Blind, ya'll have been pushing this for MONTHS! MONTHS! I saw this on Tumblr a long time ago and its made its way over here too. Everyone claims its Meghan but what author is writing a book on her and Harry? Any guesses? ALso the minute it is published, which I don't think is true, they will sue for defamation of character unless the author cites its source by name and no man, two at that, in Hollywood are going to come forward and attach their name to that. It would be suicidal for them.

Enty will reveal of course because who ever gave the tip will name it as Meghan.

Endless circle of BS.

I'm waiting for the blind saying she has a 3rd marriage that was annulled. Or the infamous IRS case everyone on Tumblr knows SOO MUCH about. Or maybe this imaginary agreement they claim they have. Oh and we already got the Meghan is infertile blind, next should be Harrys because of some procedure they claim he had as a child.

I totally agree about Royal fiancees, but as a black woman I also know that the "whore" accusation gets thrown more freely against us than white women who behave the same or worse. That said, I remember enough about Harry's "youthful antics" to figure that he was never going to attract a "proper" woman anyway. This whole engagement/marriage is the Windsors' way of saying "Alright, we give up and understand that the monarchy will be dead with the next generation. Why stress ourselves out by forcing the kids to marry incompatible partners? Maybe they'll actually embarrass the family less!"

The question never has been whether Harry's DNA matched Charles' at birth, but whether the family would ever actually admit to having a cuckoo. Whether Harry is Charles' by blood, he is still his son and the only meaningful challenge to that would come should at least 4 people die before the monarchy is abandoned.

Please, have our celebrity standards dropped so low?! Hewitt and William had brief moments of real world attractiveness when they were young, but neither Charle nor Harry were ever good looking absent their wealth and position.

The scariest thing about Meghan is that she stalked Harry and he fell for it. She is constantly acting in every situation. Posing and acting. And she's a terrible actress. Harry is a stupid horndog so they deserve each other.

Morality and the British Monarchy is a joke please. Anyone who has read up on its history.

I mean Anne Boleyn could just as well as been a yacht girl though I guess it would have been a schooner girl.

Camilla having an affair with Charles for all those years as a married woman. Her great grandmother having been a royal mistress to Edward VII - yes you got the title royal mistress back in those days, the royal mistresses would have status in the Royal Court and it was just assumed the King was going to have mistresses.

There are persistent rumours that Elizabeth I who had numerous lovers may have had a child raised by someone else. Supposedly she miscarried once as well.

Sorry Tatty you need to do some research and find photos of Diana's brother the Earl of Spencer especially when he was younger and his red hair was redder. And Harry has a lot of his mother in his face.

Given Prince Andrew's disaster of a marriage to Fergie and that Prince Andrew himsefl is a disaster who the hell cares about the bloody blood line.

Did she learn the trade from Eastern European special pricey girl mrs T**** I wonder? I bet they'd have a lot to chat about then. If this is even true. Or are Trump bots out in force because trump remains bizarrely jealous of the royal family's continued friendship with the Obamas. Wahhhh . Trumpski never invited to parties. Trumpie stamp feet and have bot farms spread rumors against anyone he doesn't like. Sociopaths hold grudges forever.

Advertisements

Patreon

Search Crazy Days and Nights

Get in touch & Follow us

Advertisements

Labels

Advertisements

Design By

Advertisements

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.

Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements
Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.