Why the Brexiteers can’t claim a mandate for leaving the customs union

They never mentioned it before the referendum

Cabinet minister Michael Gove: “We need to take back control of trade—that means leaving the protectionist customs union.” Photo: NurPhoto/SIPA USA/PA Images For a vote that simply asked whether Britain should remain in the European Union or leave, the Brexit referendum appears to have been about rather a lot of different issues. It was about immigration, economic insecurity, a lack of investment in the Northeast/Wales/whichever-traditional-Labour-region-the-speaker-is-from, control over laws, sovereignty, trade. And now, according to Brexiteer cabinet ministers, it appears that the vote was about the customs union. Ahead of today’s debate in the House of Commons about whether the UK should stay in the customs union (or “a customs union” or have a “customs arrangement”), cabinet ministers backing a hard Brexit insisted that any customs deal would be a “betrayal” of the referendum result. “British people gave politicians clear instructions,” tweeted Sajid Javid last weekend. “Includes leaving the Customs Union.” His colleague Michael Gove chipped in his support. “Sajid is right,” he wrote. “The referendum vote was clear—we need to take back control of trade—that means leaving the protectionist customs union.” But there’s just one small problem—they didn’t say this before the referendum. The Vote Leave website has a list of 58 “key speeches, interviews and op-eds” by its leading lights during the referendum campaign. The words “customs” is mentioned just twice, the phrase “customs union” makes just one appearance—a sentence in a 5,000-word summary outlining the reasons to vote leave. Nor did any of the Leave campaign’s leading lights mention the customs union on Twitter. Boris Johnson has tweeted about the customs union three times—but all after the referendum. Douglas Carswell has managed 16 tweets about the issue since the vote, but not one during the campaign itself. The issue simply wasn’t part of the campaign. Take a look at Google Trends for the phrase “customs union”: the first peak of interest is in July 2016, a month after the vote. No mandate Hardline Brexiteers need to understand that they have no mandate for their preferred version of Brexit. There is a mandate to leave; nothing more, nothing less. Politicians would be abiding by the vote if they opted for the softest of Brexits, a Norway-style option where the UK remains both in the customs union and the single market. Similarly, they would be abiding by the vote if they chose the most extreme version, walking away without a deal. The British people did not, as Javid claimed, give politicians clear instructions. We weren’t able to—the options were leave or remain. That’s why it’s perfectly reasonable for MPs to help decide how Brexit will work in practice. It’s not a betrayal—it’s democracy. There is, of course, another option. Hardline Brexiteers could call for a fresh referendum, one which put their preferred shade of Brexit on the ballot paper. Then, at last, the British people really would be giving politicians clear instructions.

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days. But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Email

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

Comments

Paul D

April 28, 2018 at 17:36

There was no mandate for Theresa May’s three red lines- out of the single market,out of the customs union and no ECJ involvement.
Sometimes we need protection from our government.
Donald Tusk said on day one that Brexit would be a lose- lose situation.He is right.
Barnier said that he could see no added value from Brexit for the UK or Europe .He is right.
Basically our government are lying to us about Brexit

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

How has the national broadcaster dealt with the biggest issue of our time? Plus: James Graham on John Bercow and Jennifer Williams on Manchester's housing boom (and homelessness crisis)

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days.. PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.