Friday, January 26, 2007

Anti-Semitism, Brandeis, and Carter vs Dershowitz

Jimmy Carter's book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, has been (no kidding, with a title like that) the center of some heated controversy. Some have accused Carter, who is harshly critical of Israeli policies toward the Palestinians, of anti-Semitism. This is a vexing issue; I do think some champions of Israel are too quick to label all criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic. However, I also believe that some criticism of Israel and its supporters has employed anti-Semitic tropes -- from the "Jewish conspiracy" meme, unmistakeably present in much of the talk about "the Jewish lobby," to the "Christ killer" meme -- and has often conflated the terms Israeli and Jew. (I addressed some of these questions in a column in Reason three years ago.)

I don't think Carter is an anti-Semite. However, I think that his book is a very skewed treatment of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and that some of his rhetoric is disturbing -- such as a passage that draws a parallel between the Pharisees of the New Testament and modern-day Israeli authorities. And I agree with historian Deborah Lipstadt's charge that in defending his book, "Carter has repeatedly fallen back -- possibly unconsciously -- on traditional anti-Semitic canards"; for instance, he has equated criticism from Jewish commentators who write for mainstream publications such as The New Yorker or The New York Times with criticism from "Jewish organizations."

Incidentally, social liberals might be startled to learn that in the book, Carter chronicles the fact that on a trip to Israel in the 1970s he remonstrated with then-Prime Minister Golda Meir for the overly secular nature of the Labor government. He even took it upon him to lecture Meir about the fact that in the Bible, "a common historical pattern was that Israel was punished whenever the leaders turned away from devout worship of God." (Paging Pat Robertson?) But I digress.

The specific occasion for this post is Carter's visit to Brandeis University the other day. According to InsideHigherEd News:

Carter’s invite spurred a campuswide discussion about academic freedom and the religious identity of Brandeis, an institution that was founded by Jewish leaders in an era of Jewish quotas at top institutions. Brandeis is not officially a Jewish university but has always attracted many Jewish students, faculty and donors.

...

A Brandeis trustee initiated contact with the former president during the fall term, and the proposed event had Carter squaring off in a debate with Alan M. Dershowitz, the Harvard law professor and staunch supporter of Israel. But Carter nixed that format. Some saw the decision to propose a point-counterpoint event as a sign that Brandeis was unwilling to consider Carter’s ideas alone.

“Lots of faculty felt that if you invite a president, you don’t ask him to debate anyone. You want to hear him speak by himself,” said Gordon Fellman, chair of the peace, conflict and coexistence studies program at Brandeis.

Still, others argued that not allowing Dershowitz to speak at the event violated his freedom of speech and would allow Carter to emerge from the event without being challenged on his views.

After weeks of back-and-forth at Brandeis, more than 100 students and professors signed a petition inviting Carter to speak alone. A committee of faculty members and students extended the new invitation to Carter, and he accepted. So on Tuesday, the former president gave a 15 minute speech and answered questions that had been selected in advance — a decision that some students and faculty criticized.

About 1,700 students, faculty, and other members of the Brandeis community willattend a university forum tomorrow to hear Jimmy Carter discuss his controversial new book about Israel, but their questions will be limited to those selected by a committee that invited the former president.

After weeks of furor over Carter's visit to promote his book "Palestine: Peace NotApartheid," students and faculty will be allowed to ask at most 15 questions, said members of the committee, composed of five faculty and one student sympathetic to Carter's views. They added that no follow-up questions would be allowed.

...

[C]ommittee members said the questions, which will be limited to 45 seconds, reflect a range of views and represent an efficient use of limited time. Carter has agreed to answer questions for about 45 minutes.

...

Some faculty and students, however, worry the screening and lack of follow-up questions will hamper a free exchange of views on the predominantly Jewish campus, where many hoped Carter would debate Alan Dershowitz , a professor at Harvard Law School who has criticized the former president's book.

...

Aside from the media, Carter's talk will be closed to anyone outside the Brandeis community, university officials said. ... One of those being excluded from attending the forum is Dershowitz, who pleaded with campus officials to be allowed to attend. ... A designated protest area will be set up across the street from the hall, on property belonging to the City of Waltham, said Dennis Nealon, a university spokesman.

Nealon said Dershowitz "does not have a ticket, has no Brandeis ID -- therefore he does not get into the hall."

However, Dershowitz, invited to speak at Brandies by a separate group of faculty and students, will be allowed to address the forum -- after Carter is finished speaking and has left the hall, Nealon said. The Harvard professor will be allowed to watch the former president's appearance on a closed-circuit television outside the hall.

"I think it's really foolish that they won't let me in," said Dershowitz, adding that he would allow students and faculty to ask as many unscreened questions as they like, including follow-ups. "I'm going to encourage hostile questions. I want to show the difference between allowing filtered and screened questions chosen by a pro-Carter committee."

He said he invites Carter to remain at the hall to join his discussion. He also decried the university's decision to ban signs and leaflets inside the hall where Carter will speak. "He wrote a book saying he encourages debate, but he won't debate -- me or anybody," Dershowitz said.

Now, I'm not a big Alan Dershowitz fan, on many counts. And I realize that his "I'm open to all debate" posture is partly just that, a posture. (If grandstanding were an art form, Dershowitz would win a prize.) But better noble posturing than open cowardice.

Morton Keller, emeritus professor of history at Brandeis, told The Globe that the format chosen for the event was "like a Soviet press conference." Indeed.

I agree with my friend Greg Lukianoff of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, who told InsideHigherEd News that "Brandeis was under no obligation to give Carter the whole stage, nor was it obliged to find a speaker with a different viewpoint," and that just because a college invites a speaker without a "counterpoint" to balance him does not mean it endorses his views. But allowing a pro-Carter committee to pre-screen the questions? Keeping Dershowitz out of the auditorium until Carter had left the stage? Surely there is something about this that should offend anyone committed to the free exchange of ideas.

There was at least one positive moment during the evening. According to the Globe story:

In response to a question, Carter apologized for a sentence in his book that he acknowledged seemed to justify terrorism by saying that suicide bombings should end when Israel accepts the goals of the road map to peace with Palestinians.

"That sentence was worded in a completely improper and stupid way," Carter said. "I've written my publishers to change that sentence immediately in future editions of the book. I apologize to you personally and to everyone here."

The apology is a good step. But shame on Carter for refusing to discuss his ideas in a format where they could be challenged freely. (Globe columnist Eileen McNamara defends Carter's decision not to debate Dershowitz, on the grounds that it would have been an "exercise in egotism" on the part of the attention-seeking lawyer; but if Carter had objections specifically to Dershowitz, he could have asked for another opponent.) And shame on Brandeis for agreeing to this format.

By the way, Dershowitz levels some fairly scathing criticism at Carter here (and unlike Carter, he does engage in open debate with critics on the site). He focuses in particular on the financing of Carter's project, the Carter Center, by some rather reprehensible figures in the Arab/Muslim world. For instance:

Carter has also accepted half a million dollars and an award from Sheik Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan, saying in 2001: "This award has special significance for me because it is named for my personal friend, Sheik Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan." This is the same Zayed, the long-time ruler of the United Arab Emirates, whose $2.5 million gift to the Harvard Divinity School was returned in 2004 due to Zayed's rampant Jew-hatred. Zayed's personal foundation, the Zayed Center, claims that it was Zionists, rather than Nazis, who “were the people who killed the Jews in Europe” during the Holocaust. It has held lectures on the blood libel and conspiracy theories about Jews and America perpetrating Sept. 11.

Dershowitz's demand that Carter disclose all his ties to "Arab money" has a nasty whiff of ethnic stereotyping -- which is particularly ironic since he ends his article with a plea to "stop invoking discredited ethnic stereotypes." But Dershowitz does seem to make a pretty strong case that a major source of funding from the Carter Center is not just any "Arab money," but money from shady individuals with ties to radical Islam and to criminal activities (such as Pakistani banker Agha Hasan Abedi, founder of the BCCI). And that's pretty disturbing, if true. Admittedly, Dershowitz's main source, Rachel Ehrenfeld of the American Center for Democracy, may not be entirely reliable, at least judging by this 1993 exchange in the New York Review of Books. But surely these charges are worth looking into. Maybe Carter should have had to field questions about his financial and personal ties to people like Abedi and Sheik Zayed in his appearance at Brandeis.

More: A reader informs me that if I don't think Carter is an anti-Semite, "that is because you are too weak to confront reality," and sends me a link to a story on WorldNetDaily in which said reality is, presumably, to be found. While the sender is an obnoxious jerk all too typical of a certain breed of right-wing netizen (when I asked if insulting people was really a good way to convince them of anything, he replied that he wasn't trying to convince me and added, "Let someone else rouse you from your stupor"), and WND has about as much credibility as Michael Moore, the story, posted last night, is of some interest:

Former President Jimmy Carter once complained there were "too many Jews" on the government's Holocaust Memorial Council, Monroe Freedman, the council's former executive director, told WND in an exclusive interview.

...

Freedman, now a professor of law at Hofstra University, was picked by the council's chairman, author Elie Weisel, to serve as executive director in 1980. The council, created by the Carter White House, went on to establish the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C.

Freedman says he was tasked with creating a board for the council and with making recommendations to the White House on how best to memorialize the Holocaust.He told WND he sent a memo to Carter's office containing recommendations for council board members.

He said his memo was returned with a note on the upper right hand corner that stated, "Too many Jews."

The note, Freedman said, was written in Carter's handwriting and was initialed by Carter.

Freedman said at the time the board he constructed was about 80 percent Jewish, including many Holocaust survivors.

He said at the behest of the White House he composed another board consisting of more non-Jews. But he said he was "stunned" when Carter's office objected to a non-Jew whose name sounded Jewish.

Freedman said he could not provide the historians name to WND because he did not have the man's permission.

"I got a phone call from our liaison at the White House saying this particular historian whose name sounded Jewish would not do. The liaison said he would not even take the time to present Carter with the possibility of including the historian on the board because he knew Carter would think the name sounded too Jewish. I explained the historian is Presbyterian, but the liaison said it wouldn't matter to Carter."

What to make of this? Freedman's credentials are pretty impeccable and confer a high level of credibility. However, his refusal to name the mystery Presbyterian scholar with the Jewish-sounding last name sets off some alarm bells, particularly since the man's privacy does not seem to be implicated in any way. The White House liaison is not named, either, making the story impossible to verify. And why would Freedman want to squander his credibility on a cyber-rag like WND? I plan to drop him a line and ask. Stay tuned.

More: In the comments, Joel asks what it would take for me to consider Carter an anti-Semite. He writes:

From what I know about Carter, it's long been clear to me that he is an antisemite, of roughly the same stripe as Pat Buchanan, even absent this most recent report; the only thing that's new in this new report, if true, would be his recklessness while in office.If you haven't come to the same conclusion, it's because

a: you haven't followed Carter's history of at best questionable behavior as closely as I have,

b: you have a different standard for evaluating whether or not somebody is an antisemite, or

c: both.

I think the most likely answer is (a). If Monroe Freedman's story does pan out (and he has now told it on Fox News' Hannity & Colmes), I would have no difficulty calling Carter anti-Semitic. Other disturbing allegations from the past are reported here.

67 comments:

CLEVELAND, Ohio – THE PALESTINE CONSPIRACY, a genre spy-thriller by Robert Spirko, was fourth on the best-seller list at Atlasbooks, Inc., a national book distributor

"The chief threat in the region I see right now is the threat to Saudi Arabia by Al Qaeda. If Al Qaeda were to overthrow the present royal family in Saudi Arabia, cutting off the oil supply to western nations including Japan and China, it would bring down entire world economies. France and Germany would be begging us to go to war to retake those oil wells. It would be World War III," he emphasizes.

If such a scenario were to occur, France and the European economies would collapse in a matter of weeks.

“Another looming concern is Iran which wants to develop nuclear weapons to couple with their Shahab 4, 5 & 6 missiles which have a range to hit London, all of Europe, southern Russia and the United States. Also, the Iranian government has said it initially had 300 centrifuges to enrich uranium to weapons grade material. They have increased that to 3,000. They will soon increase that again to 10,000 centrifuges,” Spirko says. “They have the additional capacity to add another 20,000 centrifuges in mass production techniques that will enable them to produce at least seven nuclear bombs in about a year. Where did they get these centrifuges?”

Spirko answers his own question by stating an Arab proverb, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

“Simply put,” Spirko explains, “they probably got them from Saddam Hussein before the Iraq War started and were probably smuggled out of Iraq and into Iran just like he did his air force of 600 Soviet fighters. In other words, he gave them to his former enemy rather than let them be destroyed on the ground.”

“Why would he have done any differently with the 30,000 centrifuges he supposedly had on a decentralized basis inside Iraq before the war?” Spirko asks. “Isn’t it strange that Iran could come up with a nuclear weapons program in about six months to a year when it took the United States six years under the Manhattan Project with 5,000 of the world’s most brilliant scientists working on it?”

Another point Spirko makes on the Mideast is that, “It is time for the Israelis and Palestinians to return to the Camp David Peace Talks or some other place, resume where they left off and "freeze in place" the already-agreed-upon negotiating points,” Spirko says.

Spirko, a financial and geo-political analyst, turned his attention to the Middle East in 1987, after discovering several common elements related to the Middle East question. He wrote down his analysis, and when he was finished, he not only had a solution to the quagmire, he had a story to tell. THE PALESTINE CONSPIRACY foreshadowed the Persian Gulf War by three years, and the resultant Iraq War followed by the Sept. 11 attack.

"And, it's all related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict which I said back in 1987 was the crux of my book. It always has been, and always will be until it's settled,” Spirko says. “That linkage is exactly what Osama Bin Laden stated in a taped message aired the weekend before the election in November of 2004. Whether you believe him or not is beside the point. That's what's he told us, and we'd better take that into account."

The novel is a mass market paperback produced by Olive Grove Publishers, and can be purchased at area bookstores through Ingram Book Group, New Leaf Distribution, and Baker and Taylor, priced at $14.99, ISBN 0-9752508-0-9. THE PALESTINE CONSPIRACY can also be ordered on the web at www.atlasbooks.com, or email orders from: order@bookmasters.com, or from Barnes & Nobles, Border's, Dalton's, efollett.com & Follett bookstores at colleges and universities, WaldenBooks, Amazon.com, Walmart.com, Target.com and other popular retail bookstores. Or, readers and store managers can call 1-800-BOOKLOG, or 800-247-6553 direct, to order.

"That sentence was worded in a completely improper and stupid way," Carter said. "I've written my publishers to change that sentence immediately in future editions of the book. I apologize to you personally and to everyone here."

Whatever might be wrong with Carter, that's a good and proper apology, especially by modern politician standards.

No "sorry you were offended", no "sorry I was misunderstood".

(PS. I won't be buying Spirko's book, because it's being spamvertised. Well, that and I wasn't interested anyway.)

"That sentence was worded in a completely improper and stupid way," Carter said. "I've written my publishers to change that sentence immediately in future editions of the book. I apologize to you personally and to everyone here."

Whatever might be wrong with Carter, that's a good and proper apology, especially by modern politician standards.__________________

Not so fast. An apology is meant to convey an acknowledgement of a mistaken opinion, or a misspoken one. Carter seems to suggest in his aplogy that he misspoke, that he did not mean to say what he said when he wrote: "It is imperative that the general Arab community and all significant Palestinian groups make it clear that they will end the suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism when international laws and the ultimate goals of the Roadmap for Peace are accepted by Israel."

However, if the sentence was a poorly-worded statement, let's see how Carter clarifies the misunderstanding in a recent Al-Jazeera interview:

"Well, I don’t really consider, I wasn’t equating the Palestinian missiles with terrorism. But when the Palestinians commit terrorist acts, and I mean when a person blows himself up within a bus full of civilians, or when the target of the operation is women and children – such acts create a rejection of the Palestinians among those who care about them. It turns the world away from sympathy and support for the Palestinian people. That’s why I said that acts of terrorism like I just described are suicidal for the popularity and support for the Palestinian cause. "

So let's see what I understand from these comments:

- that Qassams lobed at the residents of Sderot, or Ashkelon, cities, not military bases, causing damage to houses and killing people as they cross streets, or work , killing and maiming kids playing in backyards, these are not terrorist attacks.

- that he, Carter, only used the term "terrorist" to describe a suicide bomber because this is how such an act is perceived by "the world".

- that he, Carter, does not consider such acts to be profoundly immoral and criminal, but rather counterproductive, because they are not good for the Palestinian image.

The sad fact of life is that pacifism leaves its adherents no choice but to become first servants, then slaves, and finally prison b*tches, of any bully they encounter.

Just as Ghandi felt compelled by his belief in pacifism to support the Holocaust, because the Jews' "moral high ground" could only be maintained by peacefully submitting to the nonexistant mercies of the Nazi bureaucracy, so too is Carter being left no other pacifist option but to pave the way for Israel's destruction.

I suggest everyone read his book, despite the complaints about it, for nothing illustrates how a man can be too nice for his own good like Jimmy Carter's continuing pacifism-fueled descent into madness.

I only hope he doesn't share Ghandi's fate. It would have been far more instructive for Ghandi to have been forced to capitulate to the Muslims' demand for a separate nation, as he was on the verge of doing in the name of peace, than for him to be shot by his own men in a doomed effort to prevent the surrender.

If Carter is allowed to live, he will eventually have no choice but offer himself to Osama bin Laden, and hopefully it will be clear to one and all just where absolute pacifism inevitably leads.

There is no question Carter is an anti-semite. Several years ago I saw him on TV being interviewed by Bill Moyers. He referred to Jews as the "Chosen People" in contemptuous, sarcastic tones. I was appalled, especially since I had been foolish enough to have voted for him twice for President.

Carter is an example of a political loser - Pete McCloskey is another one - who could not own up to their own failures and shortcomings and so blamed their political demise on the Jooos. Never mind that Carter's presidency was a disaster, or that the stereotypical "Reagan Democrat" was a blue-collar Catholic.

Another example of Carter's anti-semitism was his call a couple of years ago for a "final solution" to the Mideast conflict. It is impossible that he does not know the implications of that phrase, so he must have used it only for the purpose of mocking and taunting Jewish sensitivity about the Holocaust.

Thank you for your invitation; as you requested, I'm posting this here:

I don't condone the content or the tone that your recent correspondent engaged in when questioning you about your issues in recognizing Jimmy Carter's antisemitism, but I'd invite you to consider the broader question: just what does it take for you to decide that somebody is an antisemite? Assuming that you don't have any difficulty in acknowledging that, say, David Duke or Pat Buchanan are (there are people who would claim that Buchanan's antisemitism is, at most, not established), what more -- beyond what you know to be the case -- would Jimmy Carter have to say or do in order for you to decide that he was an antisemite?

And let me add this: from what I know about Carter, it's long been clear to me that he is an antisemite, of roughly the same stripe as Pat Buchanan, even absent this most recent report; the only thing that's new in this new report, if true, would be his recklessness while in office.

If you haven't come to the same conclusion, it's because

a: you haven't followed Carter's history of at best questionable behavior as closely as I have,

b: you have a different standard for evaluating whether or not somebody is an antisemite, or

c: both.

There's not necessarily anything wrong with a and/or b, but I do invite you to, to the extent that you think it's important or relevant if an important political figure is corrupted by judenhasse, think these issues through.

It's not like Jimmy Carter is -- or will be -- the only important American political figure who is an antisemite, or whose suggested policies will be legitimately attacked on the grounds of his antisemitism.

This appology struck me as pablum for the simple reason that I have a hard time believing that in the multiple drafts and multiple readings and multiple editings that have to happen before the book was published it is almost unbelievable that no one looked upon that passage and asked "is this really what you want to say?" If that did happen, then perhaps it says almost as much about the collective mindset of the group involved in producing the book as it does about Carter himself.

China Wholesale has been described as the world’s factory. This phenomenom is typified by the rise of buy products wholesalebusiness. Incredible range of products available with wholesale from china“Low Price and High Quality” not only reaches directly to their target clients worldwide but also ensures that China Wholesalers from China means margins you cannot find elsewhere and China Wholesale will skyroket your profits.

Thank you so much!!cheap polo shirts men'ssweate,Burberry Polo Shirts lacoste sweater, ralph lauren Columbia Jackets,ski clothing. Free Shipping, PayPal Payment. Enjoy your shopping experience on mensclothingus.com.You can find the father who desire fashionable, intellectual mens clothing simultaneouslyGod bless you!I really agree with your opinions.Also,there are some new fashion things here,gillette razor blades.gillette mach3 razor bladesfor men.As for ladies,gillette venus razor blades must the best gift for you in summer,gillette fusion blades are all the best choice for you.Fantastic!God bless you!Meanwhile,you can visit my ,we have the highest quality but the lowest price fashion products wholesale from China.Here are the most popular China Wholesale products for all of you.You can visit .Also the is a great choice for you.

A study last yearnike tn, the author in the essay read NIKE , a reporter at the Shanghai headquarters in an interview, nike chaussuressee a pr in high school to read a league plans, employees interviewed told reporters in Beijing's streets, they children to interview, the children said, "truly understand them." tn chaussures These words, if the author touches product function, brand spirit and culture is to become part of the consumer of two basic methods

Well, I don’t really consider, I wasn’t equating the Palestinian missiles with terrorism. But when the Palestinians commit terrorist acts, and I mean when a person blows himself up within a bus full of civilians, or when the target of the operation is women and children – such acts create a rejection of the Palestinians among those who care about them. It turns the world away from sympathy and support for the Palestinian people. That’s why I said that acts of terrorism like I just described are suicidal for the popularity and support for the Palestinian cause...its always gonna be safer side if you would only concentrate of your own life like i am doing being a used cars dealer :)

sneakers shoes She continued,"Why...? Don't you need someone to pose as your girlfriend this year?" Then he answered, "No, there is no need for that anymore......"Before he can continue, he was interrupted, discount nike shoes"Oh yes! Must have found a girlfriend! nike shox r4 You haven't been searching for one for the past years, right?" The man looked up, as if he has struck gold, his face beamed and looked directly at the drunken girl. tn dollarHe replied, "Yes......you are right! I haven't been looking for anyone for the past years."With that, the man darted across the floor and out the door, cheap nike shoesleaving the lady in much bewilderment. He finally realized that he has already found his dream girl, and she was.....the Vancouver girl all along! The drunken lady has said something that awoken him.All along he has found his girl.nike tennis shoes That was why he did not bother to look further when he realized she was not coming back. It was not any specific girl he was seeking! cheap nike shoxIt was perfection that he wanted, and yes.....perfection!!Relationship is something both parties should work on. Realizing that he had let away someone so important in his life, he decided to call her immediately. His whole mind was flooded with fear.free shipping shoes He was afraid that she might have found someone new or no longer had the same feelings anymore..... For once, he felt the fear of losing someone.As it was Christmas eve, the line was quite hard to get through, especially an overseas call. He tried again and again, never giving up. Finally, he got through......precisely at 1200 midnight. He confessed his love for her and the girl was moved to tears. nike shoes It seemed that she never got over him! Even after so long, she was still waiting for him, never giving up.He was so excited to meet her and to begin his new chapter of their lives. He decided to fly to Vancouver to join her. It was the happiest time of their lives! nike discount shoes But their happy time was short-lived. Two days before he was supposed to fly to Vancouver,cheap puma shoes he received a call from her father. She had a head-on car collision with a drunken driver. nike shox shoes She passed away after 6 hours in a coma.The guy was devastated, as it was a complete loss. Why did fate played such cruel games with him? He cursed the heaven for taking her away from him, denying even one last look at her! How cruel he cursed! How he damned the Gods...!!nike free shoes How he hated himself....for taking so long to realize his mistake!! That was in 1996.The moral of this story is :Treasure what you have...Time is too slow for those who wait;Too swift for those who fear;Too long for those who grief;Too short for those who rejoice;But for those who love...Time is Eternity.For all you out there with someone special in your heart, cherish that person, cherish every moment that you spend together that special someone, for in life, anything can happen anytime. buy shoes onlineYou may painfully regret, only to realise that it is too late.

Once upon a time, there was a mouse father.He wanted to marry his daughter to the greatest person in the world.But, who was the greatest person in the world?Oh! puma ferrari shoescheap nike shoesThe sun! He must be the greatest person in the world.The mouse father went to talk to the sun."Hello! Mr. Sun. puma shoesferrari shoesI know you are the greatest person in the world.Would you marry my daughter?""What? I'm not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is the cloud.If he comes out, I’ll be covered."nike shox nzUgg BootsThe mouse father went to talk to the cloud. “Hello! Mr. Cloud. I know you are the greatest person in the world. Would you marry my daughter?” nike 360 air maxnike shox shoes“What? I’m not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is the wind.If he comes out, I’ll be blown away.”cheap puma shoespuma drift catThe mouse father went to talk to the wind. “Hello! Mr. Wind. I know you are the greatest person in the world.Would you marry my daughter?” “What? I’m not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is the wall. If he comes out, I’ll be stopped.”cheap nike shoxnike air max 360The mouse father went to talk to the wall. “Hello! Mr. Wall. I know you are the greatest person in the world. Would you marry my daughter?” “What? I’m not the greatest person in the world. The greatest person is YOU, the mouse.” “The greatest person in the world is … mouse?” “Yes, the greatest person in the world is mouse. See? If mouse comes out, I’ll be bit!” nike air maxpumas shoesThe mouse father was very happy. He finally knew mouse was the greatest person in the world. He would marry his daughter to the handsome mouse next door. cheap jeanscheap levis jeansed hardy jeans

If the request is granted in bankruptcychi flat iron court in New York, New York City OTB to their efforts, Chapter 9 municipal reorganization in the same hearing on Jan.chi flat irons 19 refused to fail. New York OTB arrested

Operations on 7 chi guitar flat ironsDecember and asked for dismissal, when the state senate for a year without making the necessary legislation to postpone the reorganization plan submitted in November fund.

Excellent is the only word i can give u for this wonderful blog, keep it up. Bonus Bwin I will come back again to read some more interesting things on this topic. Bonus Bet365 Help each other around us is good. We can show a good example to our kids by doing this Bonus UnibetThanks for the informative article, I loved reading this Bonusuri Pariuri

So informative things are provided here, bonusuri pariuri, I really happy to read this post,I was just imagine about it and you provided me the correct information I really bookmark it,for further reading,So thanks for sharing the information. bonus bet365, bonus bwin , bonus betclic

he actual Oughout Benjamin Pineda Gomez stated he previously zero name or even information about the person who diedDressed up in the olive airfare Ed Hardy go well with in addition to helmet, the actual emporer who is minute inside series towards the throne satisfied the large chopper on the Nike Air Max normal water many times throughout an hour or so Two of this alerts faulted the organization for the crisis reply and pipe deterioration Ed Hardy Shop Corporation spokesperson Alan Jeffers explained there was zero primary association amongst people problems and also the direction failureIn DALVAY BY-THE-SEA, Prince Edward Area (AP) Burberry cheap Prince Bill enjoyed showing his or her army heli-copter instruction with his first-ever h2o landing Saturday to the pleasure involving nervous throngs in Canada, Cheap Air Max exactly where he / she with his fantastic better half, Kate, have been getting their first recognized international excursion considering that the weddingOhydratesTransport Section Air Max 2011 speaker Patricia Klinger claimed the organization features because answered the warnings as well as the circumstance seemed to be sealed The item says "testing Cheap Air Max Shoes this weibo

the Swoosh draws inspiration from amid probably the most basic moments in world history.red colorway,varsity royal,The new Nike air Max 90 design in Blazer Mid extremely Berry is now readily available at your Nike merchants like eBay,Check it out.Resheed Wallace assisted the Boston Cetics get away to some shot start this 20092010 NBA normal season,The new design arrives in merely a tiny tad pricey worth of $1200 MSRP,Air Max 90 Boot! It is certainly a studded kick! It arrives in dark and bright wardrobe with all those nasty sharp looking metal cone near to the upper.I also adore the huge minimize DNA framework 6,The sneaker spells style,It has splatter effect near to the heel using the DNA framework of Spiz’ikes boots,and yellow accent.As the Yankees developed backdrop for profitable latest championship games.Custom pattern sneakers are even more and even more getting popular.Resheed Wallace assisted the Boston Cetics get away to some shot start this 20092010 NBA normal season,New Jordan CP3,The New Nike Vunk is in reality a hybrid of Nike Dunk and Nike air Max 95,0 Brata version,I adore the checkered printon its heel panel,It is going for getting an air Jordan retro fever again.I adore the purple coloring from the shoe laces as well as the grey blue coloring from the lining inside the opening from the sneakers.I also adore the shoe’s external solitary that arrives usually beautifully,Check out the Nike air Force one reduce Brazil 2005 is now readily available in eBay.Check out the brand new Habitat Skateboards design for 2010,The sneaker arrives within of an awesome metallic Silver Upper using merely a tiny swoosh near to the facet panel that arrives in wealthy red-colored colorway,it is extremely confusing to create the big difference in between Parra and Patta,A customized pattern sneaker will certainly provide out the character and expertise of your small ones,shiny,It arrives with bright midsole and dark external solitary sealing the bright color.You will certainly adore this kick,Check out the brand new Nike air Max shoes GS that arrives within of an awesome neon yellow part that compliments the grey lining near to the toe hat lining and facet panel from the shoes.I adore the dark leather-based upper with just some red-colored accent near to the shoe laces and near to the heel panel,The facet panel arrives in earthy yellow patent leather-based for accent as well as the swoosh arrives in dark patent leather,Check out the brand new Nike air Max Lebron VII Christmas,The new Nike air max 2010 huge in the price tag of $105 in distinctive merchandising stores

About Me

Writer and journalist, author of Growing Up in Moscow: Memories of a Soviet Girlhood (1989) and Ceasefire: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality (1999). Columnist for Reason (monthly) and, from 2000 to January 2007, for The Boston Globe (weekly). Born in Moscow, Russia in 1963; came to the United States in 1980. Rutgers University graduate.

Comments policy

All commenters are welcome, as long as they abide by a few simple rules.

1. Please maintain a civil and respectful tone toward other posters (including, of course, the blog owner). Heated arguments are fine, but it should be possible to argue your point of view passionately without insulting other people or their views. Specifically:

* Absolutely no name-calling.

* No profanity (except when quoting from another text).

* No accusations of lying or twisting facts (unless you have proof to back up such an accusation), deliberately avoiding the truth, or other forms of dishonesty.

* No bigoted remarks about any group.

* No unfounded accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, or other forms of bigotry.

2. Please do not post comments irrelevant to the thread topic.3. No anonymous comments, please. If you are not using a Blogger or Google account or Open ID, please use a name or nickname when posting a comment.