Diverse Linkage

There’s a tumultuously adventuresome discussion thread going on over at GLPiggy’s about “citizenism” versus white nationalism, in which your cockily imperturbable narrator has contributed some choice morsels (look under ‘heartiste’).

Couple addendums: I wasn’t familiar with WN until the one degree of separation internet revealed glorious new vistas to me. As such, I’m not up to speed on their political platform, although I can make an educated guess. I prefer not to spend too much time around relentlessly serious people, a fatal personality defect that some (some!) WNs share with feminists and grievance group racialists.

And, I’m not doctrinaire on the subject of national homogeneity. Like with most things in life, quality and quantity matter. A huge nation can accommodate some small number of immigrants who don’t resemble the native stock. I spell it out in more detail over there at piggy central, but in short, I believe an advanced nation’s social and economic health is best served by an immigration policy that does not shift its majority ethnic/racial demography below 80% of the total population. Obviously, the US is past that critical ratio and falling fast, and just as obviously, the US is concurrently experiencing the long, slow decline to has-been status in earnest, complete with all the expected attendant neuroses afflicting ever larger swaths of individuals and communities.

ps Libertarians are still stoopid. And it mostly hinges on their willful blindness to this issue, the one issue to rule all issues.

pps I might emigrate someday in the distant future for, ah, moister pastures, to which a pro-swamp white people advocate might justifiably accuse me of hypocrisy. Hey, no one said life was tidy. I think Social Security is a Ponzi scheme waiting to implode, but that doesn’t mean I’ll turn down the SS checks the government sends my way when I’m old. Countries have a right to restrict who enters and gets to stay, and if, for example, Poland decides not to accept my application for citizenship, then I’ll abide their decision. I won’t like it, but I’ll understand perfectly well why they enforce the immigration policy they do.

Last time i looked, South Africa isn’t exactly a textbook example of laizzes faire. Heck, the current “system” wouldn’t even be possible, were it not for meddling by Western progressives preventing the whites down there from arming themselves properly.

No they’re just dreamers who prefer moral masturbation to the actual reproduction of success. The beta male masturbates to pornography, the libertarian masturbates to moral principles.

They’re not even willing to test their Idea somewhere on an island before selling it to their fellow individual human souls. Show me a successfull open-border libertarian society. At least when you watch pornography you’re watching something plausible.

Forget libertardians’ fantasies, instead read Jean Raspail’s The Camp of the Saints. That’s what open borders will look like in the future.

if i want to invite people to stay at my home, i pay for the costs all myself, and said people happen to live in another country, who are you to stop me?

the easiest way to solve the “immigration crisis” is to privatize everything – the schools, hospitals, police forces, even the fucking roads. you can then abolish all the taxes, along with the welfare state. then people can discriminate to their hearts content. if white people want to live in gated communities and send their kids to all-white schools, more power to them. same goes for white business owners. and Asian business owners and landlords will fill the gaps and serve the blacks and Latinos.

of course, then conservatives wont be able to tell other people how to live their lives. their minds would just explode from the thought of having to keep their shitty ideas to themselves, rather than use the government to control others.

for all the talk of libertarians being utopians, its the conservatives on here who still cling to the unbelievably naive idea that they can take control of government from liberals. this hellhole is of your own making, for condoning an institution that has outlived its usefulness. Americans would be better off without government.

High levels of immigration are bad for the wages of middle class and working class Americans and have contributed to their stagnation in real terms over the last 30 years. Further illegal immigrants are net tax eaters rather than net tax payers.

Unto the third and fourth generations Hispanics esp. those from Mexico and Central America who for some time have had a heavy Amerindian mix to them, drop out from high school at rates similar to blacks, actually somewhat worse, and assimilate much less than European immigrants from various different Euro countries did historically.

Mass levels of diversity are our weakness, not our strength. The later is pure cultural Marxist / new left horseshiite.

Here here. The open borders crowd are unwilling to assert national self-esteem. And as much as I like Ron Paul, his poo-pooing of the border fence because “it might keep Americans from escaping to Mexico” is a shabby argument.

Our two great minds have chanced upon
no mere coincidence:
cluck surely is aware of The Ways of Teh Krakken
Correctional Therapists have merely tired of O’s
Constant cell-pleasuring himself to pix of piggy’s balloon-knot
It’s a reciprocal. 3 seconds of bliss for 504 more blog hits.

i’ve not banned you, man. ulysses from hidden leaves has had trouble commenting on my blog as well. not sure what’s going on. i can assure you i didn’t ban you. i don’t like you, but you’re fun….for me to poop on.

you know i usually jump on the race train but hell all the shit i said before still true today.

But truth prob is if there were no minorities we would find a reason to kill each other it would just be officially sanctioned killing in one form or another that is the beauty of white people if ya tell em it is legal to kill some peeps they are the best at it in the world as long as you label the enemy correctly.

the top 5 most homogenous states in the USA are also among the top 7 safest states, and by a big difference.
If you’ll look at the world, there’s the same correlation, especially (and that too by a large margin) if the race is white or asian.

What are the safest two not so homogenous states? I’d guess Hawaii is one of them. Lots of diversity but it’s almost all E. Asian diversity. Well and native Hawaiians. They do seem to get into a bunch of violence but they’re not that many pure or almost pure blooded ones around anymore is my impression.

The South has changed, but 150 years isn’t that long ago, and that’s when that society was forcibly dismantled. The power structures of high patriarchy no longer exist but the culture persists in a diluted form. I learned a lot living in Richmond, where most of the long-term residents are its legitimate descendents. A.S. went a long way towards teaching me how to recognize unconscious regional values, and I’d recommend rereading it if you ever travel down South. Taught me a lot about the assumptions of alphadom.

Shhhhhh! A horse-faced jewess (who *somehow* managed to promote her nothing-blog on national TV and radio) DOESN’T LIKE IT when the talk here turns to white males looking out for their own ethnic interests. Stop it right now.

Exactly. Don’t blame the Jews as a whole. We’re hard working people who support the local economies to which we’ve spread (strong family values, very conservative.)

A few of the louder morons on the left, are, shamefully, Jews. I believe it’s every Jews responsibility to shut these fools up and ostracise them. That said, know that the religion and the culture itself is completely antithetical to these fools.

I have to go with Old Joe Kennedy:”The jews ruin everything they touch.” Yes you’re “hard-working”,but it always seems to wind up with you being wealthy and everybody else being poor. I just read an article on water in the “Holy Land” as Glenn Beck might say. You always hear how the jooze made the desert bloom! God bless those dear jooze!! The reason the Jooze “made the desert bloom” is cuz you STOLE EVERYBODY’S WATER!!!! In America.the two biggest,steamiest,smelliest pieces of legislative shit to ooze out of the Congresional asshole were written by Jooze and strongly represent the “family values” of your crowd: The Civil rights Bill & her twin sister,the 1965 Immigration Act. Both disasters that have caused us nothing but grief.

In David Mamet’s enlightening book “Secret Knowledge”, he comments that “culture predates society, as it evolves before consciousness.” This is important b/c it’s shared culture that allows those within the culture to better predict the actions of fellow members of it – which has obvious advantages of efficiency and harmony.

From the book, early American immigrants who could refer to someone as “My Landsmen” were offering an endorsement. Mamet says it was not infallible, but the shared culture allowed those sharing to “take a large amount of energy which otherwise would have been expended on self-defense, and utilize it more productively.” While self-defense is still relevant there are newer conflicts between our many multi-cultures that are sapping our productivity.

Early American immigrants could also easily route around those landsmen that did not deserve similar trust. That was the big difference. Not different degrees of suntan.

Today, that is not possible. It may never again be possible to quite the same degree an almost endless, open frontier provided, but even in a fixed geography, there are ways to improve upon the current malaise. And that’s where effort need be directed, instead of towards hammering down wedges between possibly well cooperating people based on little more than hunches.

These are few of the many excessively proposed solutions to end racism here in America. Trillions have been spent on equalizing outcomes and blurring whatever cultural and genetic distinctions, and what do we have to show for it? Nothing. Less wealth, lonely men, dumber people, Single mothers, obesity, and the Ipad.

Liberalism is the religion of the modern western world, and one of its tenets is to deny the only logical course of action on how to truly end racism:

“Don’t, mix, races.” presupposes the existence of some omnipotent “Mixer” to whom that decision befalls.

All the genuinely dysfunctional effects you ascribe to race mixing can easily be dealt with simply by not subsidizing them. After all, white whores can get obese and bear children out of wedlock; just as darker skinned whores can. The only thing you achieve by focusing on the “other”, is prolonging the reign of terror that is liberalism, by giving it’s deluded practitioners a fallback excuse for ‘why it didn’t work this time either’.

Much cleaner, simpler and more morally justified to simply shrug your shoulders; let the obese have strokes, the starving kids starve and the dimwits do something stupid enough to take themselves out of contention. Then, if you feel guilty, do your best to replace them one for one with well raised and reared, healthy, wealthy and not so stupid offspring. If “we” don’t, someone else sure will.

I realized I was quite rambling when I wrote that, as I didn’t mean to propose that specifically racial mixing causes the aforementioned ill-effects. Mostly babbling about the state of modern society. Though my policy of simply not mixing races is the simplest solution I stand behind.

“presupposes the existence of some omnipotent “Mixer” to whom that decision befalls.”
Um, the federal U.S. government?

“Much cleaner, simpler and more morally justified to simply shrug your shoulders; let the obese have strokes, the starving kids starve and the dimwits do something stupid enough to take themselves out of contention”

However, with Obamacare, Welfare, and race riots, they will def be more than happy to do some damage to us as well before they reach their precipitous end. They hate us healthy, white, stable and well-educated people. schadenfreude is an enjoyed pastime for the devious horde.

“Wave after wave of young men surged forward to take turns punching and kicking their victim.

The victim’s friend, a young woman, tried to pull him back into his car. Attackers came after her, pulling her hair, punching her head and causing a bloody scratch to the surface of her eye. She called 911. A recording told her all lines were busy. She called again. Busy. On her third try, she got through and, hysterical, could scream only their location.

…

It happened four blocks from where they work, here at The Virginian-Pilot.

Two weeks have passed since reporters Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami – friends to me and many others at the newspaper – were attacked on a Saturday night as they drove home from a show at the Attucks Theatre. They had stopped at a red light, in a crowd of at least 100 young people walking on the sidewalk. Rostami locked her car door. Someone threw a rock at her window. Forster got out to confront the rock-thrower, and that’s when the beating began.

Forster and Rostami’s story has not, until today, appeared in this paper.

…

Rostami said the officer told them the attackers were “probably juveniles anyway. What are we going to do? Find their parents and tell them?”

The officer pointed to public housing in the area and said large groups of teenagers look for trouble on the weekends. “It’s what they do,” he told Forster.

The next day, Forster searched Twitter for mention of the attack.

…

“I feel for the white man who got beat up at the light,” wrote one person.

I’m sure the birth Tom Sowell’s kids caused massive increases in angelic mortality; while the birth of a million or so white kids to project housed, unmarried meth whores went entirely unnoticed.

Is it really so far fetched to think public housing, laws against shooting kids that throw rocks at your car, and the inability to flog said kids, Singapore style, has more to do with incidents such as these than the race of the perpetrator?

I mean, I have hired lots of STEM people in my career; and while I’m fully aware men are, on average, more likely to do a better job than women; there really are very simple and cheap tests to administer to candidates that predict potential STEM field success much better than peeking at genitals.

I’m sure the birth Tom Sowell’s kids caused massive increases in angelic mortality; while the birth of a million or so white kids to project housed, unmarried meth whores went entirely unnoticed.

I was making a rather un-PC rhetorical point. You, on the other hand, fail to understand that the standard “not all blacks are like that, and many whites are trashy too” trope doesn’t fly here. Exceptions don’t disprove the rule.

Yep. I’d double that amount. Many could stay or immigrate if they could demonstrate valuable skills or high educational achievement. But at least half of the entire population needs to go back to the continent for everyone’s best interests.

So it makes one wonder. If I was pulling the strings and wanted to orchestrate mass anger against blacks, this is one of the things I’d do.

No. White guilt is so deeply imbedded in the white population that “mass anger against blacks” is as likely as American women all becoming thin again. If anything, this Trayvon Martin bullshit was an attempt to orchestrate mass anger among blacks to terrorize whites further. Which is exactly what happened.

White guilt only exists in people who are entirely insulated from the direct effect of what is going on. As soon as criminals show up in their lives–or the lives of their loved ones–all that talk of “root causes” and systemic racism is over from that sort.

Just talk to any honest, church-going, employed black or white dude living in the rough part of town. They have zero tolerance for the thugs living in their vicinity, and hate them deeply. But they don’t stand up to them, because no one is going to help them. It is only people outside the zone of the thug’s influence–college town liberals, grant-seeking activists with trusts, race hustlers, politicians, etc.–who have sympathy for the thugs.

(1) Lock your doors at the start of the journey, not within earshot of the people you fear – it will only provoke them
(2) Do not leave your vehicle
(3) Drive away, red light or not
(4) If none of that is enough, carry a legally registered firearm
(5) If that’s still not enough, drive the South African way – never stop at a red light at night

“…in short, I believe an advanced nation’s social and economic health is best served by an immigration policy that does not shift its majority ethnic/racial demography below 80% of the total population. …

ps Libertarians are still stoopid. And it mostly hinges on their willful blindness to this issue, the one issue to rule all issues.”

We’re not all blind to it. I don’t personally know any libertarians who advocate throwing the borders open (as we have). As I see it there’s nothing wrong with immigration provided you make sure you’re letting in people who can contribute economically and are going to behave like citizens of your country. But that’s the farthest thing from what we have now. Hayek also pointed out that socialism can work to some extent in a homogenous society but it’s a fucking disaster in a heterogenous one.

The quick route is to buy a passport from Dominica or St. Kitts/Nevis. They cost about $100K/$400K respectively (the latter gets you visa-free entry into more places). If you can write for money or otherwise work remotely, you could just travel the world on 3-month visas until you find where you want to be a permanent resident. The big issues would be cost, hassles of travel, and people or property tying you to the States.

As I see it there’s nothing wrong with immigration provided you make sure you’re letting in people who can contribute economically and are going to behave like citizens of your country. But that’s the farthest thing from what we have now.

Right. If I were dictator, I’d scrap family reunification (chain migration), which causes self-contained enclaves isolated from the broader society, as well as taking in refugees from holes like Somalia, and the diversity lottery, which is also heavily slanted toward overpopulated holes like Africa.

I agree with Tyrone. However, those countries we allow immigration from, should also be willing to let Americans come live and work there. It isn’t fair Americans can’t get a job in other countries, but they can get jobs in our country.

Most immigrants aren’t “sent” by their “countries.” I bet Thai immigration to many Northern European countries, at least a decade or so back, was heavily skewed towards women. And not because Thailand were “sending” them away.

Reason.com does not speak for all Libertarians. I don’t know of any Libertarians advocating open boarders. Libs are not going to support letting poor people in. Those poor people end up on welfare and food stamps. Not what we need.

I haven’t seen a single writer for Reason that didn’t look, talk, and think like a common OWS liberal loser. They seem to focus on leftist junk over there; it’s a bunch of stuff about abortion, sep. of church and state, 1st Amendment, while ignoring the rest. They put out an article on Ayn Rand every once in awhile to keep their manly libertarian cred.

Which just goes to show you, any ideology adopted by SWPL assholes winds up becoming just another platform for advancing SWPL assholery. Somehow, they always find their way to the same place, whether they’re calling themselves libertarians, liberals, socialists, or whatever.

Moral of the story: don’t buy your political views from SWPL assholes.

Now I consider myself a libertarian (not a Capital L, or even a small L, but rather a subscript “l” libertarian) and while I don’t always agree with Nick and the gang, I tend to be simpatico with their worldview. That being said, I disagree with them about having open borders, but I DO agree with them that our national immigration policy, such as it is in its incoherent mess, is a complete waste of money and completely ineffective at what it purports to do. In that sense, Nick and the gang do a service to thinking people.

I’m guessing you’re referring to Frison and Bradley’s Solutrean Hypothesis, but they do not claim that Iberians preceded Asiatics, nor could they based on the current genetic data. If those guys were white then they were wiped out or assimilated by the brown people, killed by a comet or blown back to Spain by the screeching winds of the Younger Dryas event.

states became superpower because of the open door policy. what is there to not understand? libertarian means: political philosophy that advocates free will, individual rights, and voluntary cooperation. it focuses on means of allowing thriving society not to be bothered with regulation. please, take a dump on that.

America became wealthy because of it’s relatively reasonable system of laws / property rights and freedoms. Ireland too, soon as they started aping the American model. As did Hong Kong; and even Chile.

That model did originate from European thought, but since thoughts copy cheaply, one does not have to be of European blood stock to benefit from it; any more than one have to be of Russian stock to benefit from an AK-47 (Ask Ice Cube.)

At various points in history, non Europeans have lived in wealthiness societies than what existed in Europe; and not because some magic “genetic fitness” happens to fluctuate wildly over mere centuries or a few millennia.

Interestingly enough, arguably the step from merely wealthy to bona fide Superpower, nukes, came about because of Jewish refugees from a regime that really believed in the whole “European superiority” thingy.

I guess those “coloreds” didn’t like their house and street or something. As long as the law was such, that I could buy whatever guns I wanted to prevent them from destroying my house and street, who cares what they do to theirs’?

The problem today is, laws are no longer such. Instead laws are such that I have to pay taxfeeding goons to prevent those coloreds from destroying their houses and streets. And mine, since the same taxfeeding goons prevent me from buying the guns I would need to prevent those coloreds from doing so.

And, you really, truly believe that one needs to be Russian to benefit from an AK-47? You sure have some “unorthodox” views.

I largely agree with CH on this. However, I think Europe should not only be reserved for Whites but for the particular ethnicities of various nation-states (they should really be ethnostates in other words). As for the overseas White Western countries, maybe they could have some degree of diversity, but no where near the degree of anti-white mass invasion promoted by hostile elites we have now.
The White Nationalists tend to promote generalizations that the elite leftists denounce. WN claims about NAMs and others tend to be true generally and so overlap with a HBD understanding of reality (in other words the truth). But the WNs make the opposing error of the leftist egalitarians: the left finds minorities of non-whites who are not undesireable or that different then whites and then ignores the majorities who are different or undesireable. They basically seem to think that the exception somehow disproves the rule. Meanwhile, the WNs seem to understand how most non-whites are alien or unpleasant and then insists that the rule is absolute with no exceptions or grey areas.
I think CH made a good point that interracial dating is on the minds of some of the commenters and strangely is not being discussed too much by others. There are some assimilatable non-whites of every background (to differing degrees depending on what race or ethnicity one is talking about) and the WNs really for ideological reasons are not willing to allow such people to stay if they had power. Many WNs are basically race purity fanatics who act live non-whites are pests and not human.
So sexy non-white women are not dateable because of abstract purity beliefs and a decent non-white person is not exceptable because other members of their race may be morons or criminals or simply non-white. It is not even clear where the WNs would draw the line concerning people of mixed ancestry. Would a 75% White and 25% Amerindian person be allowed to stay? How about a person who is Hungarian or Bulgarian or Finnish and has some sort of ancient monogoid mix but is culturally European?
I like white nationalism (believe or not) because the current regimes in the West are anti-white and their lies need to be combated. However, alot of the WNs really are the mirror reflections of the anti-white “liberals,” they really do treat pro-white as a code word for anti-nonwhite.

I largely agree with CH on this. However, I think Europe should not only be reserved for Whites but for the particular ethnicities of various nation-states (they should really be ethnostates in other words). As for the overseas White Western countries, maybe they could have some degree of diversity, but no where near the degree of anti-white mass invasion promoted by hostile elites we have now.
The White Nationalists tend to promote generalizations that the elite leftists denounce. WN claims about NAMs and others tend to be true generally and so overlap with a HBD understanding of reality (in other words the truth). But the WNs make the opposing error of the leftist egalitarians: the left finds minorities of non-whites who are not undesireable or that different then whites and then ignores the majorities who are different or undesireable. They basically seem to think that the exception somehow disproves the rule. Meanwhile, the WNs seem to understand how most non-whites are alien or unpleasant and then insists that the rule is absolute with no exceptions or grey areas.

When terms like Judeo-Christian began penetrating the American vernacular, we started seeing the capability/penchant of the jew to shape and control the frame through clever wordplay. It is on this foundation that they have based most of their power. George Carlin pointed out the absurdity of PC language. When PC gets deconstructed, the jewish power structure lays exposed and weak.

If true cultural assimilation is the benchmark by which we allow immigration, the question is this: Is Dinesh D’Souza “assimilated?” Is John Yoo “assimilated?” Is Ayan Ali Hirsi “assimilated?” Is Marco Rubio “assimilated?”

On the other had, is Nancy Pelosi “assimilated?” Is Bernie Sanders “assimilated?” And no fair thinking that Nancy Pelosi is really a refugee from some Stepford wives planet.

It’s not about race, not at all. It’s about buying into what the United States really represents as a culture. What we SHOULD be asking is not who we should let in but who we should deport.

Is they guy who cuts my lawn and who owns two trucks and talks to all his guys in machine guy Spanish, “assimilated?” Is the Polish guy who did my garage roof (he has 4 trucks), but will never ever be able to string together a gramatically correct sentence in English “assimilated?”

Send Nancy and Bernie to Mogadishu, and bring in guys like my lawn guy and my roof guy. They will work. They will bust in their asses. They will be productive. Kick out the leeches. Bring in the workers.

I disagree. I believe that when speaking of large social groups, racial makeup is the key determinant. A racially non-diverse nation could be of any political stripe. China is doing pretty well under a totalitarian regime. Fascist Germany was pretty damn efficient as well. Even Socialist programs work a lot better in far northern europe because they are largely racially homogeneous. On the other hand Greece, Spain, Italy, France…those welfare state programs don’t fare so well because they have a lot of “diversity” (non-indigenous free riders.) Our social programs and public education in the US are also inefficient in large part to the diversity of our racial classes.

It’s not politics, its the genetic makeup of the citizenry. I think the 80% mark is a good one. I’m all for taking the best and brightest of all races to make up the other 20%. I’d even go a step further and support race mixing if it were limited to high IQ East Asians.

Really? Dinesh has a brain. Dinesh has added valued to the public discourse. Deport all the Bernie Sanders and Occupy yahoos with their gender studies and art history degrees, and bring in more Dinesh’s.

I largely agree with CH on this. However, I think Europe should not only be reserved for Whites but for the particular ethnicities of various nation-states (they should really be ethnostates in other words). As for the overseas White Western countries, maybe they could have some degree of diversity, but no where near the degree of anti-white mass invasion promoted by hostile elites we have now.

The White Nationalists tend to promote generalizations that the elite leftists denounce. WN claims about NAMs and others tend to be true generally and so overlap with a HBD understanding of reality (in other words the truth). But the WNs make the opposing error of the leftist egalitarians: the left finds minorities of non-whites who are not undesireable or that different then whites and then ignores the majorities who are different or undesireable. They basically seem to think that the exception somehow disproves the rule. Meanwhile, the WNs seem to understand how most non-whites are alien or unpleasant and then insists that the rule is absolute with no exceptions or grey areas.
I think CH made a good point that interracial dating is on the minds of some of the commenters and strangely is not being discussed too much by others. There are some assimilatable non-whites of every background (to differing degrees depending on what race or ethnicity one is talking about) and the WNs really for ideological reasons are not willing to allow such people to stay if they had power. Many WNs are basically race purity fanatics who act live non-whites arepurity beliefs and a decent non-white person is not exceptable because other members of their race may be morons or criminals or simply non-white. It is not even clear where the WNs would draw the line concerning people of mixed ancestry. Would a 75% White and 25% Amerindian person be allowed to stay? How about a person who is Hungarian or Bulgarian or Finnish and has some sort of ancient monogoid mix but is culturally European? pests and not human.
So sexy non-white women are not dateable because of abstract
I like white nationalism (believe or not) because the current regimes in the West are anti-white and their lies need to be combated. However, alot of the WNs really are the mirror reflections of the anti-white “liberals,” they really do treat pro-white as a code word for anti-nonwhite.

“[I]n short, I believe an advanced nation’s social and economic health is best served by an immigration policy that does not shift its majority ethnic/racial demography below 80% of the total population”

Most minorities and immigrants do not assimilate into our culture. They may live in America, but they live in their own little groups and keep the culture from wherever they came from. The Chinese live together, the blacks live together, the Mexicans live together, etc. Not only do they live separate and away from white influence, but they are constantly being celebrated for being different in popular culture. This reinforces the idea that they are different from white Americans, and reinforces non-american cultural bonds.

These minorities then, are allowed to be racists and allowed nepotism while taking advantage of racial Marxism with programs like affirmative action. They become leeches who take advantage of special privileges and then in turn use their places in society to help the other people in their minority culture. Mexicans earn money in the states, then send it to their families in Mexico, who spend it in Mexico. Muslims hire Muslims, Jews hire Jews, etc. And they do all this while hating white Americans and rejecting our social customs.

When I was in a very racially diverse school system on the west coast, with my high school being 35% white, the white kids were regularly called “whiteboy” instead of their names, they were picked on for being white, and were accused of being racists and getting special privileges for being white. Now, in White American culture, kids are taught that violence is bad and to avoid confrontation, while in Black American culture, kids are taught to fight. My school was 10-15% black, but they were involved in 90% of the fights. When I was a senior in high school, our family moved to a very white state and into an affluent neighborhood. The school was 99% white, with two black kids that i knew about (there might have been a couple more, but it was a big school). One was adopted by a white family and was a good student, and the other was a foster kid from out of state who got in the only fight of the year and was constantly causing trouble. The first kid had been raised in a white family in a white community away from minority culture, while the second kid had been raised in a minority culture and moved to a white culture.

80% is nice arbitrary starting point, but the real solution is to force assimilation of culture. If minorities can congregate, then they can cultivate their anti-social, anti-white cultures and become parasites.

They are dividing and conquering us, we need to divide and conquer them.

“the country was not built by indians. it was created, built, expanded and maintained by white euros. ”
Surprise gift for the first to spot the pretty lie in this statement.

“a german and a dane are going to find they have a lot more in common than a german and a congolese, especially if they are thrust into a new land together.”
Yeah quite probably, but like it or not a euro-american and an african-american (or any american) in a non-american country, including european ones, have more in common with each other than with the natives. Especially if they are of similar socioeconomic class and have lived in relatively integrated areas, the shared culture trumps the genetic differences.

I’m a libertarian and I don’t believe in open borders. The British Labour Party deliberately ran an open borders policy, for no other reason than to annoy white people with WN tendencies. The result is that half of public housing in the UK is now occupied by people who were not born here.