Friday, 9 September 2011

Ireland's tribes

A recent article in the weekend section of the Irish Times gushed ‘there are tens of thousands of Nigeria’s Igbo tribe in Ireland’. As well as ‘a thriving Congolese community’.

Yes.

Reflect on that for a few moments, and then join me as I head to Limerick in search of some other savage tribes, this time of the Irish variety. Now about 18 months ago I wrote about a €1.5 billion ‘regeneration project’ for the ‘deprived areas’ of that city. As I said in that post, deprived means that “they’re infested with criminal gangs, violent anti-social behaviour is rife, disputes between ‘neighbours’ are often resolved by way of arson or murder. The police run scared. In effect, society there has broken down, despite the presence of many decent families.”

Now the solution was a brave one. Essentially to knock down the existing housing stock and put the criminal gangs, arsonists and murderers into new houses. At which point they’d overnight become model citizens, staying in every evening to enjoy a warm cocoa before heading to bed at ten - prepared for another day of hard but honest work.

What could go wrong? After all, a sociology professor came up with the idea.

Well sadly, and amazingly, the new houses didn’t have the expected impact. According to the Sunday Independent, “the attacks, fire-bombings and threats continue, resulting in terrified families fleeing their neighbourhoods.”

Who could have imagined?

Our tax Euros at work.

Anyway, I'll leave you with a cultural quiz on Limerick:

Q: What does a Limerick girl use as protection during sex?A: A bus shelter

Q:What do you call a 30 year old Limerick girl?A: Granny

Q: What do you call a Limerick girl in a white tracksuit?A: The bride

Q: What's the first question on a Limerick quiz night?A: What the fuck you lookin' at?

54 comments:

Speaking of Tribes I am having a very interesting discussion here, and wondered if you would like to link up with it and tell me what you think. My idea is simply to accept Khazar Jews as Whites and get them onside where they support White rights. As simple as that really:

Yes all of this is true , but all of this is as a result of government policies enacted in Dublin , throwing money and benefits at the most financially unproductive elements of society in order to create a ghetto city , just so shitheads in dublin can take the attention away from their own city , hamper economic development in the Midwest and close shannon airport ,

I didn't know that Ireland had been so "diversified" and "vibrantified" (or is that vibranted?) with Congolese. Well after reading about the Congo at Unamusement Park here http://unamusementpark.com/2011/08/welcome-to-the-jungle-unamusement-park-explores-the-congo-part-1/

I suggest this jape:

What do you call an Irish girl after being diversified with a Congolese?

@ShaunantijihadAshkenazi Jews AREN'T WHITE. Ed Miliband looks more like a Paki than a whiteman. They often have big rubber lips and jewfros like blacks and hooked noses like Arabs. That must be why they side with them against whites. They must have some negro in them. Interbreeding with whites, only makes some of them look white. They hate whites and can't be trusted. Sorry.

And does being Shaun Anti-Jihad mean accepting tens of thousands of Nigerian Igbo Christians eh, Mr Anti-Jihad. I can't ever imagine the likes of Ed Miliband ever being pro-white. He is THE ENEMY. His sort should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.

Well, it is a fairly obscure piece of local history. I noticed one day a bunch of really beautiful bricks buildings placed uniformly around a square and started asking around about it. Even the local library doesn't have much detail.

That is what I know: around 1900, with German industry in full swing and many people moving to the cities, people began to notice the phenomenon of young loafers and idlers given to vandalism and petty criminality.

So the municipality - as yet untouched by the Frankfurt school of thought - decided to do something about it and in 1904 built that little village.

From what I read, it had the desired effect. The adolescents and young men worked for sustenance and were given the option of learning a manual trades such as bricklaying or carpentry.

Basically, it was the anglo-saxon workhouse writ large and with ambitions to educate as opposed to simply wharehouse the occupants.

The good times lasted only shortly. The war saw massive recruiting of underage boys and thereafter the village came under the scrutiny of Germany's new socialist government.

They were appalled to see that the young men worked up to 43 (gasp!) hours a week and had a rather lean diet. So the politicians decided to starve the village of money which meant that they had to fire their instructors.

It languished for a while until the Nazis came to power and turned the whole thing into a baracks.

The point is: The western world has tried the dole. Fail. It has tried putting them in new houses. Fail. It has tried to calm them down with Ritalin and social workers telling soothing tales. Fail.

Why not try again what was a promising experiment and give it time to either flourish or fail?

Right now we're doing the same thing over and over again and expect different results.

Two tribes one created by dysgenics and the other by 3rd world immigration. Both would be prevented if people had common sense and accepted that IQ and other traits necessary for civilization to occur are actually very heritable. Even without 3rd world immigration most cities in the Ireland and the UK will come to resemble the roughest parts of Limerick, given enough time. Single motherhood among women of low IQ is glorified meaning cad genes are increasing all the time. Meanwhile high IQ females are encouraged to go to college, compete with men in the workforce and have maybe 0/1 kids.

A financial apocalypse could potentially in some way have a eugenic effect. I know it sounds cruel, but it could cause less harm in the long run than turning a developed country into a violent, disease-ridden 3rd world hellhole.

Saw that about Gibson. Bummer. It looks as though he has decided to come in from the cold.

Off-topic:-

http://tiny.cc/98xgx

The Future of the Capitalist World is Controlled by 2 Students of Marx

By John Galt – September 7, 2011Posted in: Breaking News, Economics

What would one say if the two most powerful leaders in the West, the proverbial free capitalist world, have never held a job in private industry, never signed the front of a check, and spent their childhood and collegiate years studying under professors and affiliations who studied and professed the ideals of Communism and Karl Marx? That is the unique situation the European Union and United States of America find themselves in this very day. As the crisis in crony capitalism and attempts at a command and control economy begin to fail once again, the results are entirely predictable, especially when one takes the time to review the historical backgrounds of the world leaders involved in determining the fate of the West.

Speaking of Tribes I am having a very interesting discussion here, and wondered if you would like to link up with it and tell me what you think. My idea is simply to accept Khazar Jews as Whites and get them onside where they support White rights. As simple as that really:

http://unamusementpark.com/2011/09/oh-stormfront/#comments

Shaun, I cannot agree. I too pop into "Unamusement Park" regularly, and, agree wholeheartedly with his musings ... just as I agree with Gilad Atzmon:-

But they are a drop in the ocean and are completely overwhelmed by the reeking sea of insane zionists who want us utterly destroyed at worst, or ignorant, trembling serfs at best.

The jews have fucked people over for so many generations and have, in turn, been hounded out of their ghettoes so often that hatred, fear and distrust of whites is hard-wired into the majority of them. It's become race-memory.

There is a reason they have been violently expelled from over a hundred countries and states in the last two milennia ... often physically thrown out at spear- arrow- and gunpoint. Literally told that they would be huinted down and executed if they returned.

Didn't stop 'em. Look at France. They are now running the show. And england. And the US ...

I have a jewish friend who is a star, but her sister is a raving fucking loony. Anything approaching criticism brings on a shrieking hysterical attack in which everyone hates her and wants her dead or gone. In normal people this would mean a trip to the shrink, but to a large minority of jews this paranoia is quite normal.

Remember also, that jews are like third worlders ... they love drama. But their inborn instability often turns the theatre into reality ... for them, anyway.

So, short version, Shaun ... ain't gonna happen. They only way it could is if the ordinary jews rein in the paranoid lunatics in their ranks. But the paranoid loonies are the ones that scrabble to the top of the heap and they are running the show, so ... once again, ain't gonna happen.

Think I'm being unfair? Read a few of the less complimentary statements by say, Benyamin Netenyahu and the chief rabbi's on us YTs in the grand scheme of things.

Conservatives like to talk about the causes of Western Civilization’s downfall: feminism, loose morality, drug abuse, Christianity’s decline, reality TV. Blaming civilization’s downfall on lardy hagfish such as Andrea Dworkin is like a doctor diagnosing senility by an old person’s wrinkles. The fact that anyone listened to such a numskull is a symptom, not the cause, of a culture in decline. The cause of civilizational decline is dirt-simple: lack of contact with objective reality. The great banker-journalist (and founder of the original National Review) Walter Bagehot said it well almost 150 years ago:

History is strewn with the wrecks of nations which have gained a little progressiveness at the cost of a great deal of hard manliness, and have thus prepared themselves for destruction as soon as the movements of the world gave a chance for it.

Every great civilization reaches a point of prosperity where it is possible to live your entire life as a pacifist without any serious consequences.

Many civilizations have come to the state of devolution represented by modern Berkeley folkways, from wife-swapping to vegetarianism ...

Anonymous said...“@ShaunantijihadAshkenazi Jews AREN'T WHITE. Ed Miliband looks more like a Paki than a whiteman. They often have big rubber lips and jewfros like blacks and hooked noses like Arabs. That must be why they side with them against whites. They must have some negro in them. Interbreeding with whites, only makes some of them look white. They hate whites and can't be trusted. Sorry.

And does being Shaun Anti-Jihad mean accepting tens of thousands of Nigerian Igbo Christians eh, Mr Anti-Jihad. I can't ever imagine the likes of Ed Miliband ever being pro-white. He is THE ENEMY. His sort should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.”

Anonymous 9 September 2011 17:59

Your views are not only at odds with reality but make the case for white rights distasteful to the general public, and is a main obstacle to our view being widely accepted. Consider this:

Delusion: “Ashkenazi Jews AREN'T WHITE. Ed Miliband looks more like a Paki than a whiteman. They often have big rubber lips and jewfros like blacks and hooked noses like Arabs.”

Reality: They have mixed genetics, some people, like Hitler, have just a single Jewish grandparent. Some of them look like Natalie Portman.

Delusion: That must be why they side with them against whites.

Reality: All of them? That is an incorrect generalisation. Hitler had Jewish Generals. The blogger I quoted, http://unamusementpark.com/, as well as the blogger Lawrence Auster at http://amnation.com/vfr/ identify themselves as white with some Khazar ancestry and support white rights. And Muslims must murder all Jews worldwide to bring the last Imam in their insane ideology, so Jews will not support them against whites once they understand the reality of Islam.

Delusion: They must have some negro in them. Interbreeding with whites, only makes some of them look white.

Reality: They look Negro and look white? How do they manage that! My, they really are accomplished! But yes, constant interbreeding with whites would make them not only look white externally, but in every other way as well. It’s called genetics.

Delusion: They hate whites and can't be trusted. Sorry.

Reality: Again, all of them? How could you know? And many of “them” are only partially Khazarian and mostly white. I accept your apology, for you do need to apologise.

Delusion: I can't ever imagine the likes of Ed Miliband ever being pro-white. He is THE ENEMY. His sort should be hanging from the nearest lamp post.”

Reality: He married (or intends to marry) a white girl called Justine Thornton. So I guess that is at least one white he doesn’t hate. But he sure doesn’t have much choice about being your enemy, whether he wants to or not, does he? In reality, like all Labour leaders, he has committed High Treason by transferring our sovereignty to the EU. But that is not necessarily because he is of immigrant stock or is a Khazar, though I accept it as a possibility. It is more likely because he subscribes to the ideology of the Marxist New World Order, as do many whites, like Blair and Brown before him. If we use this false line of reasoning we get this syllogism. Miliband is a Traitor. Miliband is a Khazar. Therefore all Khazars are Traitors. But then we also get this: Blair is a Traitor. Blair is English. Therefore all English are Traitors.

Delusion: That your view will ever get the support of the general public.

Reality: We need the support of the traditional Conservative voters, who will never vote for someone with your viewpoint, before we are sunk by the nation-destroying, mass-immigration of Muslims and Negroes by the acolytes of the New World Order. And that means simply accepting that you do not have the right to drag some poor bastard out of their bed at 5am and hang them from the nearest lamppost because their grandfather was allegedly Jewish. Do you accept that you do not have that right? Do you?

The dangers are essentially:

1. Marxism/Communism – Those following this ideology are a cancer upon the nation.

2. Negro and Muslim immigration and breeding – These are the result of the above, but ordinary white people must be made to understand that their offspring will be destroyed by either the Negro genome in our gene pool and/or Islam. But we should remember that they were invited by the Marxists using our taxes, and that those who have not committed crimes should be treated as decently as is affordable and reasonable when we send them and their broods away.

3. You. You and those who continue to hold your viewpoint are holding us back. To be blunt, you are poisoning the well with unreasonable hatred.

We do not have the luxury of time Anon, and just as Irish and English have settled their differences and get on together, it is my opinion that settling the so called Jewish question by simply accepting those who wish to be accepted, and who support white homelands, should be accepted, because doing so will help the average Conservative voter to view the right and the necessity for white homelands more favourably.

Great Posts ShaunAntiJihad. Take it from me that there's a gigantic spectrum of views among Jews and while the majority do have fears of ultra-white Christians, they DO NOT hate all whites, or anything even close to it.

As regards looks, most Ashkenazi Jews are as white as anyone else in their community.

@anon 15.45I have to disagree with you about Dublin/East Coast centric policies,though you are are certainly correct about throwing money at the least,rather NON-productive.That happens everywhere and not just in Ireland.

I don't know Limerick well but it would seem to me that the Mid-West region has done very well out of East Coast taxpayers.

After all,we are the majority in population and pay the majority of taxes.

And government in this country is dominated by non East-Coast politicians,all looking out for their own little part of the world.

Nobody wants Shannon airport to close,and I don't believe it ever will-thats just scare tactics thrown up every couple of years by opportunistic local politicians.

Anyway,we have enough problems in this country without basically like minded people like us throwing up artificial divisions that,in reality,do not exist.

Antisemitism is a disease, it's carried by Jews. Jews have no intention of putting your ethnic interests above or even on par with theirs, without Jews "White rights" would be simply known as "rights", we'd still be living in our own homelands by the rules of our own cultures. They engineered the destruction of whites in the first place. The only thing that would make Jews PRETEND to support "white rights" is if the day comes that they think pretending so will be "good for the Jews", the standard they judge everything on. Only if they feel they are under physical threat, that their victims will violently backlash at their attempted genocide, will they back down. Mere economics won't do it, their hatred for non-Jews is too intense - look at their activities in South Africa. They've been this way for thousands of years and they won't change in the next thousand.

Your suggestion is already being tried on a massive scale by Conservatives like the Republican Party and Glenn Beck, how's that working out for them? Have the Jews backed off one iota from sponsoring genocide against the Repub's constituents, even after the Republicans launched wars for them? You just can't get more obsequious than a Beck or Bachmann, what is the Jews reaction to them? They hate their guts. Your Idea isn't new, it has been done to death and it is a failure.

@jerry and others. You miss the central point. Namely that it might be a good idea not to designate all Jews as evil white Christian haters. It is a demonstrable fact that very many Jews support WN causes, and no, they are not 'spies in the camp' So that's all I'll add - address the point that the poster makes.

I live near the Dutch border... but really - this experiment was not SOOO special. Like I said, the English workhouses were not so dissimilar. Also, life in rural Germany at the end of the 19th century actually resembled life in the model village: If you didn't work, you didn't eat. The model village was just an attempt to apply rural common sense to urban troublemakers.

@ Shaunantijihad

You've probably noticed that I pride myself on a somewhat nuanced viewpoint with regard to Jews. I think however that you've picked the worst possible example for your ideas in Mr Milliband.

No matter what his religion, this asiatic toad has no business living in a European society, much less governing it. The founder of the Turkish republic, Kemal Ataturk, looked positively Aryan compared to THAT creature.

Heck, Omar Sharif would act the part of an Englishman more convincingly than Milliband. At least he plays Bridge like a gentleman of the Reform Club.

Let Milliband govern whatever exotic place will have him. But Great Britain? The country that spawned Nelson, Wellington, Gladstone? Seems rather absurd...

Before even thinking on how to classify Khazar Jews, run them through the brown-paperbag-test. I'm rather sure the Milliband brood would be weeded out rather swiftly...

Ask yourself, if the "allied" military adventures in Egypt and Libya got rid of the satanic Mubarak and Ghaddaffi, and there is now an opportunity for Western style Demockery to flourish, what can one expect from these two countries as well as Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria and Iran when NATO, France, UK and US are done, there?

please go here:

http://trevorloudon.com/

Scroll to:- Barbarism in Aghanistan.

That is pretty much what we can expect ... and don't think that the govts. of the US, UK, France, etc. don't know this ...

Think it can't happen in your suburb? Just down the road to the shops? The people of Yugoslavia thought that.

Franz, if you tried that model village experiment nowadays, the only people who would benefit would be the human rights lawyers, as the "victims" would take a case to Strasbourg for being forced to - horror of horrors - support themselves. Same goes for any similar initiative - it would be stifled by the labyrinth of regulations and red tape it would have to get through.

Re the mechanization of agriculture:The advances in agricultural and industrial technology in the last couple of centuries have meant that only a minority of the population has to do any real work for society in general to survive.

For most of human history, almost everyone had to work all the hours God gave them. For every one person who could avoid work through social status, there were twenty who had to support him through the sweat of their brows.

A relatively small number of White people changed all this through their innovations in science and technology. Thanks to their contributions to industry and agriculture, the earth's resources can me made to furnish the needs of everyone through the efforts of a relative few.

Then came democracy and politicians who extract wealth from the productive and creative minority to buy the votes of the rest. The latter consist of government employees, beneficiaries of affirmative action, welfare recipients, and companies who grow fat on government contracts (often obtained through corruption). Result: dysgenic population growth and idiocracy.

The only thing that would make Jews PRETEND to support "white rights" is if the day comes that they think pretending so will be "good for the Jews", the standard they judge everything on.

Doing well by doing good. It can be sincere, I think, but not relied upon, and I don't have a problem myself allying with Jewish individuals or groups as Jews.

Some people SAY whites should accept Jews as whites.

What they MEAN is that whites should let Jews should run things.

I have no problem allying with individual blacks, either.

That doesn't mean I'd have one as a member of my organization.

There's this Jew in the U.S. who won a seat in the legislature representing a black district.

Amazingly -- at least amazingly to anybody NORMAL -- this Jew was hurt and upset when he was not allowed to join the Congressional Black Caucus.

@joel

Namely that it might be a good idea not to designate all Jews as evil white Christian haters.

Like Michael Levin said:

Some Japanese are tall.

For some reason, Jews -- and philosemites -- seemingly lose the ability to think when the subject turns to Jews, apparently misunderstanding and always rejecting arguments that they readily accept and see the sense of with regard to other groups.

and no, they are not 'spies in the camp'

Tell it to Ernst Zundel. He had a young Jewish ally who later had a "come to Jesus" moment.

So to speak.

I have no doubt many are sincere.

I just don't think that cooperation, however sincere at one moment, can be relied upon.

Jerry is right. It's in their genes to hate us. Period.Guys, what are we gonna do about all this importation of thirdworlders and their breeding habits? Serious question. I mean, look at the second photo too - ostensibly white kids that have been so 'niggered up' by the jew media that they too are useless and counterproductive. In the short term at least, i don't see a [civil] way out...

Dov Lior (Hebrew:, born 1933) is the Chief Rabbi of Hebron and Kiryat Arba in the southern West Bank. He is also the rosh yeshiva Kiryat Arba Hesder Yeshiva[1], and also heads the "Council of Rabbis of Judea and Samaria".

Lior is considered by many to be a leading scholar of the Religious Zionist camp. In the late 1980s the Attorney General barred Lior’s election to the Supreme Rabbinical Council following a public outcry over statements he made suggesting that captured Arab terrorists could be used to conduct medical experiments. Lior also issued a religious edict saying "a thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew's fingernail".

Rabbi Dov Lior, a senior authority on Jewish law in the Religious Zionism movement, asserted recently that a Jewish woman should never get pregnant using sperm donated by a non-Jewish man – even if it is the last option available.

According to Lior, a baby born through such an insemination will have the "negative genetic traits that characterize non-Jews." Instead, he advised sterile couples to adopt. ..."Sefer HaChinuch (a book of Jewish law) states that the character traits of the father pass on to the son," he said in the lecture. "If the father in not Jewish, what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism! These are not traits that characterize the people of Israel."

Lior added identified Jews as merciful, shy and charitable – qualities that he claimed could be inherited. "A person born to Jewish parents, even if they weren't raised on the Torah – there are things that are passed on (to him) in the blood, it's genetic," he explained. "If the father is a gentile, then the child is deprived of these things. .

'The "brown paper bag test" was a ritual once practiced by certain African-American and Creole fraternities and sororities who discriminated against people who were "too dark." That is, these groups would not let anyone into the sorority or fraternity whose skin tone was darker than that of a paper lunch bag, in order to maintain a perception of standards.'

I'd wager that if you expose Mr Milliband to the sun for two days on end, he'd have no chance of passing the test and not even the aforementioned Creole fraternities would have him. So why should any sane Englishman?

Well, I wasn't actually defending Miliband. His example was thrown at me and so I took it up. If you re-read my point, it was that Miliband should not be assumed to hate whites per se, as he is married to one, nor that he should face treason charges because of the colour of his skin, because we still uphold the rule of law, don't we? Miliband should be on trial, along with every leader since Heath, for the things they have done. Moreover, there is thus every justification to consider null and void all laws since the Treason plot was formulated - and thus the question of the legal status of every immigrant and their descendants can properly be investigated.

Let us look at this in reverse. If Miliband should be on trial because of his skin colour, a ridiculous proposition, then Blair and Brown should not be on trial. Absurd really. They should both be on trial for High Treason and international gerrymandering. What connects them is international socialism/Marxism.

Again, looking at this in reverse, what benefits whites? If you accept that the pretend Jews called Khazars (whatever % white they are), are in positions of power to help halt and reverse Negro and Muslim immigration, wouldn't that benefit whites? If they support our destruction, however, no-one gets a free pass, whether Khazar or white or black or whatever.

By the way, the Constitution states that only a person born in the islands may sit in either House. Whilst I agree with that, obviously the Constitution was written by people who never expected that future generations would sell out their country to the quasi-religious internationalist cult of Marx.

"If they support our destruction, however, no-one gets a free pass, whether Khazar or white or black or whatever."

This is the nub of the issue Shaun. As we know (Blair, Brown etc.) there are all too many 'normal' whites that have sold us down the river. There are also many jews who have fought against it. Take support where you can get it would be my view.

BTW Blair isn't English despite being born here... God knows what it's vile looking missus is. The father of that is a serial shagger and dole fiddler. Incredible that his spawn became a 'human rights' lawyer but then maybe it isn't?