Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2009 16:59 schrieb Edward Kmett:
> Bikeshedding: Would it be better to put the definition for +> (or better
> yet <>) in the dictionary for Monoid with a circular definition for
> mappend? That way new code defining Monoid instances can avoid ever having
> to even mention mappend.
+1
Best wishes,
Wolfgang