If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

The Muscle and Brawn Forum is dedicated to no nonsense muscle and strength building. If you need advice that works, you have come to the right place. This forum focuses on building strength and muscle using the basics. You will also find that the Muscle and Brawn community stresses encouragement and respect. Trolls and name calling are not allowed here. No matter what your personal goals are, you will be given effective advice that produces results.

Please consider registering. It takes 30 seconds, and will allow you to get the most out of the forum.

After much discussion on the issue, endless thought, and more then a few reality checks, I've decided on a full body approach.

I've wanted to try a full body approach for over a year, but have had a steep learning curve. One of the issues I have faced is that, even though I don't use many exercises to begin with, it was hard for me to whittle them down further. It takes time to adapt to a full body approach. Man, did I learn that.

I am starting with basics. Goals are size and strength, as always. I WILL stick to this routine while cutting.

NOTES
--I am going to "try" cleans. Right now I can't get the back of my hands anywhere near the top of my shoulders. It's not a flexibility issue. It's a big arm issue. I don't know if hang cleans are worth it as a replacement for cleans. I have never really tried them.
--No ab, calf, forearm, trap work.

--Deadlifts. I will progress by one rep each workout. Part of me wants to try 2 to 3 rep sets. We'll see. Single reps don't seem to help my deadlift max.

--Progression. I will progress as fast as I can without going to failure.

I want to give this at least until Easter. I am planning on "re" continuing my cut, and using a dieting approach that is heresy...the Warrior Diet.

What are your thoughts on hang cleans? Are they worth it for shoulder work?

I tend to think of it like this.

Full cleans as part of a heavy day

Hang cleans as part of a lighter day.

It's not that with the hangs your using a lighter weight, but that it's just a bit less work overall. The hangs are more for working on the bar catch, as opposed to the pull phase. I find both give more of a traps session as opposed to delts.

Want a serious delt move? Put the bar on your back like a squat, and squat. Now, do presses from the bottom position. Use a very light weight to start. Your hitting the muscles in a whole new way in this position. I felt this inmy delts and traps like never before.

Want a serious delt move? Put the bar on your back like a squat, and squat. Now, do presses from the bottom position. Use a very light weight to start. Your hitting the muscles in a whole new way in this position. I felt this inmy delts and traps like never before.

Sweet mother of Cheesecake. The thought of that just spiked my test levels.

Do these guys do one press from each squat? Or multiple presses from a single squat?

The program I was using had multiple reps per set in the down position.

I'm not actually sure about Dimas. However I have to say that watching Dimas train makes most men look like pussies. On top of that his form is freaking beautiful! Look at the way he pulls the bar. Holy crap.

The program I was using had multiple reps per set in the down position.

I'm not actually sure about Dimas. However I have to say that watching Dimas train makes most men look like pussies. On top of that his form is freaking beautiful! Look at the way he pulls the bar. Holy crap.

His strength did give me a Mangasm (a testosterone-spiked urge to grow a beard, kill something and eat its meat, and punch through a wall with my bare hands).

I might try them in reps of 3. I get the feeling they will leave me very sore.

[QUOTE=MuscleandBrawn;12305]His strength did give me a Mangasm (a testosterone-spiked urge to grow a beard, kill something and eat its meat, and punch through a wall with my bare hands). NICE!!!I might try them in reps of 3. I get the feeling they will leave me very sore.

I wonder if front-style presses would be good as well?[/QUOTE]

No, your balance is way off for that to work. The bar is too far forward fr a front press from the bottom.

His strength did give me a Mangasm (a testosterone-spiked urge to grow a beard, kill something and eat its meat, and punch through a wall with my bare hands). NICE!!!I might try them in reps of 3. I get the feeling they will leave me very sore.

I wonder if front-style presses would be good as well?[/QUOTE]

No, your balance is way off for that to work. The bar is too far forward fr a front press from the bottom.

This summer, inspired by Casey's post in the full-body thread in bb.com site as well as my own success with Randall Strossen's 20 rep squats program, I decided to stick to full-body.

Over the summer, for short periods (6-8 weeks), I tried two different implementations of the H/L/M protocol.

The first had me doing all heavy low rep work on Day 1. All high rep light work on day 3. Day 5 was medium rep and weights. I didnt like this, may be my implementation wasnt good and I was trying too much. But OH presses suffered after benching. Same with squats and DL, although not as much, since my back can take relatively more abuse than pushing muscles.

The second had me mixing it up. There are 3 main muscles from each type, push (chest, delt, tri), pull (back, bi, traps) and legs (quads, hams, calves). Each day, I would train heavy, low rep for one from each group, medium rep for one from each group and same with light. Felt awesome and strong, and this way, none of the big lifts suffered due to the other. Overall, I would go with the biggest muscle from each group as heavy on the first day (chest, DL, squat), and so on. So, over the week, overall stress was still H/L/M.

When I return to H/L/M protocol, I will stick with the second variant, not the first. The first one is a good option, no doubt, especially for those with average or above average genetics, but for relative hard-gainers I like the second one. Not sure whose protocol it is (Hepburn or Sloan or Starr), but this is something I tried, and thought I will throw it out in this thread.