PSG’s 4-0 drubbing of Barcelona (complete with - ooohhh! - Lionel Messi, the greatest player in the history of the Multiverse…ever) obviously stands out. The return leg at the Nou Camp (sorry…Camp Nou) shall be an interesting affair. I wouldn’t be surprised if Barcelona are awarded a penalty - and PSG have a player sent off - within the first ten minutes...

PSG’s 4-0 drubbing of Barcelona (complete with - ooohhh! - Lionel Messi, the greatest player in the history of the Multiverse…ever) obviously stands out. The return leg at the Nou Camp (sorry…Camp Nou) shall be an interesting affair. I wouldn’t be surprised if Barcelona are awarded a penalty - and PSG have a player sent off - within the first ten minutes...

Lionel Messi, the greatest player in the history of the Multiverse…ever

Click to expand...

I think he is addressing the 'ever' part,which seems to be the majority consensus.And even I agree,and Rebaljo has recently written a post about how tough Footballers had it back then and how they were objectively better.Check his posting history.Also,what is kind of controversial.Messi had artificial GH injected into him in his growing years as he was stunted.

PSG’s 4-0 drubbing of Barcelona (complete with - ooohhh! - Lionel Messi, the greatest player in the history of the Multiverse…ever) obviously stands out. The return leg at the Nou Camp (sorry…Camp Nou) shall be an interesting affair. I wouldn’t be surprised if Barcelona are awarded a penalty - and PSG have a player sent off - within the first ten minutes...

Click to expand...

Well, it looks like Rebajlo was right. PSG didn't have a player sent off, but Barcelona were awarded two very questionable penalties, which helped them complete the largest comeback in the history of the Champions' League.

I think he is addressing the 'ever' part,which seems to be the majority consensus.And even I agree,and Rebaljo has recently written a post about how tough Footballers had it back then and how they were objectively better.Check his posting history.Also,what is kind of controversial.Messi had artificial GH injected into him in his growing years as he was stunted.

Click to expand...

f3dor -

As The Philosopher correctly observed, I did not imply that Messi isn’t the best player in the world (or one of the two best players in the world…) at the moment. Messi is definitely an all-time great. In my opinion, he’s just not the “best ever”.

Comparisons of Messi with players from earlier eras are problematic because the nature of the game has radically changed in a very short time. Referees now afford attacking players a level of protection which was unimaginable even fifteen years ago. Aggressive hatchet-men who deliberately try to hurt the opposing team’s star players have been comprehensively excised from the “modern” game therefore Messi isn’t forced to endure the brutal challenges and constant intimidation of hard nuts like Chopper Harris, Tommy Smith, or Andoni Goikoetxea. The sport’s less physical nature means that players are also less likely to sustain serious injuries. This, in turn, prolongs their careers at top level.

Football’s regulations have gradually been amended to make a forward’s job much easier: goalkeepers are not permitted to handle back passes (1992); tackling from behind is prohibited (1998); and the once strictly ironclad offside rule has been softened since 1995, culminating with the adoption of the current “passive offside” interpretation in 2005.

Messi was diagnosed with growth hormone deficiency when he was ten years old and subsequently received expensive daily injections of HGH for three years between the ages of eleven and thirteen - all paid for by Barcelona. In fairness, one cannot criticise Messi for receiving treatment as a child to overcome a genuine medical condition which would have effected not just his height but his overall health. The fact that Barcelona funded Messi’s HGH program is another matter altogether. However, it must be noted that if he was growing up in the 1950s,1960s or 1970s Messi would never have become a professional footballer. Instead, he’d be a stunted little fellow likely suffering from multiple health problems who - at most - might dazzle his friends with world-class ball-juggling skills.

Right, let's examine the first four second leg matches of the round of sixteen...

Well, it looks like Rebajlo was right. PSG didn't have a player sent off, but Barcelona were awarded two very questionable penalties, which helped them complete the largest comeback in the history of the Champions' League.

Click to expand...

Jack -

PSG put in a substandard “performance” against Barcelona but the Catalans still had to customarily cheat and receive favours from the officials in order to progress to the quarterfinals. After all, UEFA wouldn’t want to see a quarterfinals stage without global marketing juggernaut Barcelona, would they…

Neymar milked a penalty when he deliberately opted to collide with PSG defender Thomas Meunier, who had stumbled and eventually fallen while turning to try to cover the Brazilian following a pass by Andres Iniesta. The Turkish (sorry, German…) referee did not initially award a penalty but after being surrounded and intimidated by a swarm of Barcelona “stars” he decided to “consult” with the goal line official and the spot kick was given…

When the score was 3-1 - with PSG ahead 5-3 on aggregate and with an away goal in the bag - Javier Mascherano fouled Angel Di Maria from behind in the box just as the striker was about to shoot one-on-one with the goalkeeper. The verdict: no penalty.

I'm sorry but I Thought Albanians were white? The Albanians on Arsenal you are referring to is Granit Xhaka, he looks white to me?

Click to expand...

Dat deceptive speed -

Albanians may be genetically White but they are 100% culturally alien Muslims who are a criminal plague wherever they migrate. I'll wager You wouldn't want Your daughter, sister, or cousin to marry one of the bastards...

Dat deceptive speed said:

Is Ronaldo viewed as white? I've always liked him more than Messi, as he is more physical and bigger. I always have saw him as a tanned Portuguese white guy.

Click to expand...

Cristiano Ronaldo is White. Multiculturalists delight in citing his Cape Verdean great-grandmother as some kind of “proof” that Ronaldo possesses distant Negro ancestry (which, of course, naturally accounts for his skill and flamboyance… ). Such idiots fail to admit - or probably even realise - that the demographics of Cape Verde and other Portuguese colonies were once far different than they are today. Cape Verde, Mozambique, and Angola were populated by comparatively large numbers of ethnic Portuguese who subsequently withdrew to Portugal when their colonial homelands were granted independence in the 1970s. In light of the above, it’s quite safe to say that Ronaldo’s great-grandmother was White. Let’s take a look at the following photographs of his family:

Thanks for the info Rebajlo! I've been following soccer or "Football" a lot more over the past couple of years, as American Football keeps pushing my favorite players out of the game. It seems as the best players in world football are white, and the foundation of most teams are white with just a few blacks sprinkled in. Although it looks like England's National team and League (The team and league I follow) are being filled with more and more blacks. Hope it doesn't go the way of the NFL.

That's blasphemous Rebaljo,and I assume,hope you made that 'concession' so as to not come off as a 14-88'er to an inquisitive poster.

Some Shiptars may pass off as whites if given the benefit the benefit of doubt upon a mere glance,but they are a race so parasitic,that they could have put the chosen ones to shame if it weren't for their near-negro level IQ and their inexplicable,Roma-like propensity to steal,peddle drugs and pimp their own women.There are pics on this very forum of Shiptars stuffing themselves in ships to Italy and then upon reaching port,begging and rioting so as to be let in.

Only the chosen ones have an even more pronounced revulsion to their own kind in the sense that they simply cannot live with in their own societies and must leech of some other people's hardwork and enterprise.Ask any Serbian,they will tell you all of this,in more vivid detail,and many more tales of this race of pilfering rats.

Thanks for the info Rebajlo! I've been following soccer or "Football" a lot more over the past couple of years, as American Football keeps pushing my favorite players out of the game. It seems as the best players in world football are white, and the foundation of most teams are white with just a few blacks sprinkled in. Although it looks like England's National team and League (The team and league I follow) are being filled with more and more blacks. Hope it doesn't go the way of the NFL.

Click to expand...

Dat deceptive speed -

Glad to be of service, mate . I should have specified that Cristiano Ronaldo’s Cape Verdean great-grandmother was on his father’s side of the family, hence the photo of his old man…

Unfortunately, European soccer is becoming blacker / darker by the season. Certain leagues - such as those of France, England, Portugal, the Netherlands, and Belgium - are obviously far worse than others but Negroes, mestizos, Arabs, Albanians, and Turks can be found the length and breadth of the continent.

The disgraceful demographics of the English Premier League are reflected in the national team’s personnel, where Negroes regularly comprise about one third of most squad selections. Contrary to what many people who don’t really pay attention to non-Premier League football often claim, substantial numbers of Negroes are also present in the English lower divisions.

For example, my Peterborough United drew 3-3 at Chesterfield on Tuesday. Chesterfield started three blacks and brought on a fourth a few minutes before full-time. Bermudan (!!!) Negro striker Rai Simons was replaced by “French” mystery mongrel David Faupala midway through the second half so Chesterfield used a total of five non-Whites.

Peterborough were quite heavily black over the past few seasons but things have vastly improved since Grant McCann took over as manager last May (too bad the post-Christmas results have been depressingly abysmal…). The starting eleven against the Spireites was all-White but Jamaican striker Junior Morias came on in the second half.

Being a Robin Hood scholar, I’ve spent a fair whack of time in and around Mansfield (for those who don’t know, that’s in Nottinghamshire…) and have a soft spot for the local football club…as well as the local beer . To my disgust, League Two (i.e., fourth tier) Mansfield Town has degenerated into a Negro-packed club. The same day as Peterborough played Chesterfield, the Stags lost 2-0 at Colchester United. Mansfield started five blacks plus - out of all things - an Indian. Colchester’s eleven featured four blacks. And people wonder why I’ve lost interest in football…

ThePhilosopher said:

That's blasphemous Rebaljo,and I assume,hope you made that 'concession' so as to not come off as a 14-88'er to an inquisitive poster.

Click to expand...

Philosopher -

Well, for a start I’ll simply refer you to the second half of the sentence from which you drew that partial quote…

Rebajlo said:

Albanians may be genetically White but they are 100% culturally alien Muslims who are a criminal plague wherever they migrate.

Click to expand...

The above combined with every previous reference I have made to Albanians down the years should provide strikingly unambiguous proof of the contempt in which I hold the “Shqiptars”. I’m not about to waste my time, your time, or anyone else’s time with elaborate dissertations about various Albanian origin theories. Suffice to say that the Albanian genetic end product is irredeemably worthless. In a rational world, Albanians would be subjected to - how shall we put it? - prophylactic eradication.

I’d like to think that anyone who reads my posts can immediately see that although I’m a “hard core racist” I’m not some kind of 14/88 head case…

Here’s a significant something to keep in mind, namely: people can be both 100% white and 100% useless, parasitic dross. The fact that dysgenic, unproductive, welfare-dependent “low class” whites not only form an unsettling percentage of the population in Western societies but also possess full civic rights is one of the main problems confronting the “Anglosphere” and Europe. Yet this is a subject that “White Nationalists” and any right-leaning political entities scrupulously ignore because they actively perpetuate the ridiculous myth that “every White wants to work” and view such “disaffected” and “disengaged” idlers as latently natural “anti-immigration” voters.

Suffice to say that the Albanian genetic end product is irredeemably worthless. In a rational world, Albanians would be subjected to - how shall we put it? - prophylactic eradication.

Click to expand...

Thanks a lot for clarifying,not that I ever doubted your sentiments with regards to erm...the subject matter.But yeah,I just went ahead with that rant to make sure that some weird theories like Turanism hold no water with you.Apologies if that post came off as an attack.

Here’s a significant something to keep in mind, namely: people can be both 100% white and 100% useless, parasitic dross. The fact that dysgenic, unproductive, welfare-dependent “low class” whites not only form an unsettling percentage of the population in Western societies but also possess full civic rights is one of the main problems confronting the “Anglosphere” and Europe.

Click to expand...

Very good point.Here is the cover of the famous book "Der Untermensch",which surely needs no introduction here:

Now tell me how many of whites whom you daily come cross have similarities with that bloke?

(And to any lurkers-this bad specimen of white DNA was specifically chosen to 'grace' the cover,as in those times the fact that non-whites were sub-human was gospel,and hence selecting one for it would be redundant).

And due to the dearth of posters here,let me play Devil's advocate too,by dealing with atleast the White Nationalists part below:

...this is a subject that “White Nationalists” and any right-leaning political entities scrupulously ignore

Click to expand...

Could this be because it is assumed that the audience,by merely even having found its way there,has already proven to be more intelligent than the average white?Plus,as a majority of whites in no way agree with the key message of White Nationalists,what point would it serve to subject the few people you have to some un-established theory of eugenics?

And another key question,who or rather how do we decide who is productive and who isn't?Okay,there are some cases where those who must be purged is clear as in say the case of homosexuals,prostitutes(assuming it was a voluntary "professional choice") and drunkards or the modern equivalent of the "Village idiot".But these are clear,"black and white" cases,and what benchmark or criteria should be set to judge one's genetic health?

Intelligence?How?Is IQ good enough a measure of intelligence?If yes,then quite a few Asians(albeit the cream of the crop) outperform Whites at IQ tests.The famous defense of "Creative spark" whenever that fact is bought up,you say?Problem is,while it is clear as day as to which society has the potential to reach the stars while others wonder what stars even are,it is very difficult to define it and perhaps impossible to quantify it in the context of individuals,especially of the same race,expect perhaps when those representing extreme ends of the spectrum are juxtaposed with one another.Or alteast I feel so.

Beauty/Attractiveness?Haha,this is one White Nationalists would lose,simply for the reason that,whether we like it or not,our societies still have a lot of comforts,pleasures and privileges to offer to the most beautiful of our race.Can anyone really tell me what White Nationalism has to offer to a white women who we can all agree is a rare beauty?Why should such a woman bother with any of this or us?She can become a local celebrity,ride the **** carousel,travel to exotic locations on the yatch of some bald,fat guy etc. etc. without ever having to commit to a day's work.Have a bit of luck on your side,sell your soul to The Devil and play your cards right and you will be taken to places of power so high,even looking down will make one feel giddy.And lets face it,even the best of us are susceptible to fall to the temptation of lust,for so intoxicating can the high it gives be.And I don't even want to begin a discussion discussing the (relative) attractiveness of men...

So tell me how does one go by segregating the healthy whites from the undesirables?

To conclude,I will state my honest opinion,which is that for now being white should be good enough,with no further conditions or caveats.Even if were to assume that few white men and women are imbeciles of the irredeemable kind,perhaps the best we can do is to pair them with one another and force them to only have one child and hope that the offspring fare much better genetically.And even if that weren't to so happen,atleast we would have effectively halved the numbers of such people in the next generation,in both absolute and proportional terms.A win-win if you ask me,for the goal of further improving our genetic stock would be accomplished every generation without the need for division and discord.

Thanks a lot for clarifying,not that I ever doubted your sentiments with regards to erm...the subject matter.But yeah,I just went ahead with that rant to make sure that some weird theories like Turanism hold no water with you.Apologies if that post came off as an attack.

Very good point.Here is the cover of the famous book "Der Untermensch",which surely needs no introduction here:

Now tell me how many of whites whom you daily come cross have similarities with that bloke?

(And to any lurkers-this bad specimen of white DNA was specifically chosen to 'grace' the cover,as in those times the fact that non-whites were sub-human was gospel,and hence selecting one for it would be redundant).

And due to the dearth of posters here,let me play Devil's advocate too,by dealing with atleast the White Nationalists part below:

Could this be because it is assumed that the audience,by merely even having found its way there,has already proven to be more intelligent than the average white?Plus,as a majority of whites in no way agree with the key message of White Nationalists,what point would it serve to subject the few people you have to some un-established theory of eugenics?

And another key question,who or rather how do we decide who is productive and who isn't?Okay,there are some cases where those who must be purged is clear as in say the case of homosexuals,prostitutes(assuming it was a voluntary "professional choice") and drunkards or the modern equivalent of the "Village idiot".But these are clear,"black and white" cases,and what benchmark or criteria should be set to judge one's genetic health?

Intelligence?How?Is IQ good enough a measure of intelligence?If yes,then quite a few Asians(albeit the cream of the crop) outperform Whites at IQ tests.The famous defense of "Creative spark" whenever that fact is bought up,you say?Problem is,while it is clear as day as to which society has the potential to reach the stars while others wonder what stars even are,it is very difficult to define it and perhaps impossible to quantify it in the context of individuals,especially of the same race,expect perhaps when those representing extreme ends of the spectrum are juxtaposed with one another.Or alteast I feel so.

Beauty/Attractiveness?Haha,this is one White Nationalists would lose,simply for the reason that,whether we like it or not,our societies still have a lot of comforts,pleasures and privileges to offer to the most beautiful of our race.Can anyone really tell me what White Nationalism has to offer to a white women who we can all agree is a rare beauty?Why should such a woman bother with any of this or us?She can become a local celebrity,ride the **** carousel,travel to exotic locations on the yatch of some bald,fat guy etc. etc. without ever having to commit to a day's work.Have a bit of luck on your side,sell your soul to The Devil and play your cards right and you will be taken to places of power so high,even looking down will make one feel giddy.And lets face it,even the best of us are susceptible to fall to the temptation of lust,for so intoxicating can the high it gives be.And I don't even want to begin a discussion discussing the (relative) attractiveness of men...

So tell me how does one go by segregating the healthy whites from the undesirables?

To conclude,I will state my honest opinion,which is that for now being white should be good enough,with no further conditions or caveats.Even if were to assume that few white men and women are imbeciles of the irredeemable kind,perhaps the best we can do is to pair them with one another and force them to only have one child and hope that the offspring fare much better genetically.And even if that weren't to so happen,atleast we would have effectively halved the numbers of such people in the next generation,in both absolute and proportional terms.A win-win if you ask me,for the goal of further improving our genetic stock would be accomplished every generation without the need for division and discord.

Click to expand...

Philosopher -

It appears you may have misconstrued my statement above, possibly because it contained the terms ”low class” and “dysgenic”. Let’s clear things up a bit…

Firstly, by “low class” I meant “of the lower / lowest socioeconomic strata” - although in most cases such a phrase is synonymous with “scum”. Sounds harsh, but one simply has to head over to the nearest council estate for instant confirmation…

Secondly, I did not advocate - or even allude to - any eugenic theories, segregation, or other pseudo-scientific rot but merely drew attention to the substantial numbers of 100% white parasites which blight both the societal fabric and treasury balance sheets throughout the Western world, particularly in the UK and Australia. Put it this way: no right-minded individual can possibly deny that such people are dysgenic in even the mildest interpretation of the term.

Lack of intelligence is not a crime. After all, there are plenty of people of what can euphemistically be termed “below average” intellect who are employed and lead responsible and productive lives.

However, being a stupid, lazy, permanently unemployed bludger who avoids work like the plague and drinks, dopes up, blasts stereos, covers himself / herself with tattoos and leads a “permanent holiday” lifestyle while residing in public housing for his / her entire ignorant, loud-mouthed, profanity-spewing existence - all courtesy of the taxpayers’ purse - most definitely is an intolerable crime. That’s my point.

The absurd myth that “every Australian / Englishman / Scotsman / Welshman / et cetera wants to work” which is so cherished and mechanically repeated by “White Nationalists” and purportedly “right wing parties” is both ideologically and electorally counterproductive. Why? Because there are far more people spanning all social strata who spend most of their waking hours at work and in transit to and from work who fiercely resent the regular compulsory “redistribution” of substantial portions of their earnings to indolent, spendthrift losers via income tax. “White Nationalists”, “paleo-conservatives”, “far right wingers” et cetera should champion the responsible taxpaying majority and not demean themselves by appeasement of uneducated halfwits who’ve never had a job - and, most significantly, do not want a job - yet shamelessly whine about government funding and public housing being allocated to foreigners when it “should go to us, coz we need it coz we’re poor”.

If the selfish dregs of the White race wish to have even the leakiest roof over their heads - let alone an endless supply of alcohol, cigarettes, tattoos, piercings, drugs, massive stereos, Playstation consoles, V8 cars, and ridiculously expensive mobile phones - then they should be forced to get a job like everyone else and pay their way through life. That was the natural state of affairs prior to the advent of the ultra-generous welfare “safety net” which dictates that the majority work to support a feckless, ever-expanding minority. I sure as hell don’t owe such ugly, rude, uncivilised, stinking, mouth-breathing morons a thing - and neither does anyone else. Religiously denying the very existence of congenital White layabouts and instead excusing such people’s so-called “poverty” with garbage about a fictitious “lack of opportunity” doesn’t do “White Nationalists” any credit.

Since "Shiptars" (ie Albanians) came up in this thread I thought I'd point out that the World Cup qualifying match that I'm currently watching between Italy and Albania had to be suspended due to crowd violence. Given that Albanian players were trying to calm their fans down I'm guessing the violence came from the Albanians.

I'm tempted to say it would require some brass balls for outsiders to go to Sicily and start fights with the locals. However, given that there seems to be a correlation between membership of the EU and decreasing levels of testosterone maybe Sicilians aren't as tough as they used to be.

It appears you may have misconstrued my statement above, possibly because it contained the terms ”low class” and “dysgenic”. Let’s clear things up a bit…

Firstly, by “low class” I meant “of the lower / lowest socioeconomic strata” - although in most cases such a phrase is synonymous with “scum”. Sounds harsh, but one simply has to head over to the nearest council estate for instant confirmation…

Secondly, I did not advocate - or even allude to - any eugenic theories, segregation, or other pseudo-scientific rot but merely drew attention to the substantial numbers of 100% white parasites which blight both the societal fabric and treasury balance sheets throughout the Western world, particularly in the UK and Australia. Put it this way: no right-minded individual can possibly deny that such people are dysgenic in even the mildest interpretation of the term.

Lack of intelligence is not a crime. After all, there are plenty of people of what can euphemistically be termed “below average” intellect who are employed and lead responsible and productive lives.

Click to expand...

Haha,and here I was,thinking you'd co-author the book on eugenics that I began writing in my previous post

However, being a stupid, lazy, permanently unemployed bludger who avoids work like the plague and drinks, dopes up, blasts stereos, covers himself / herself with tattoos and leads a “permanent holiday” lifestyle while residing in public housing for his / her entire ignorant, loud-mouthed, profanity-spewing existence - all courtesy of the taxpayers’ purse - most definitely is an intolerable crime. That’s my point.

The absurd myth that “every Australian / Englishman / Scotsman / Welshman / et cetera wants to work” which is so cherished and mechanically repeated by “White Nationalists” and purportedly “right wing parties” is both ideologically and electorally counterproductive.

Click to expand...

But that is the lifestyle that is being pushed by the establishment as the most desirable.Isn't what you described the lifestyle of most celebs,the people these idiots idolize?

And yes,having to pay for the 'welfare' of countless browns and a few whites is the biggest problem whites face and something most normal whites would identify with.And clearly whites world over are getting more and more fed up with this,and hopefully we will see more Brexits and Trumps soon.

Once again, the main on-field talking point was a heavy away defeat suffered by global media darlings Barcelona. This time, it was “merely” 0-3 at the hands of Juventus. I wonder if Barcelona will manage to pull off another headline-grabbing “miracle” at the Nou Camp? Perhaps we’ll see a decisive penalty “awarded” in the twenty fifth minute of extra time. I never thought I would see the day when I feared that - of all clubs - Juventus might fall victim to corrupt officiating…

The main off field talking point was provided by the bomb attack on Borussia Dortmund’s team bus which injured Spanish (or, if you like, Catalan…) defender Marc Bartra. Of course, this was all courtesy of a representative of the “religion of peace”.

Speaking of inbred Muslim scum, “wannabe Turk” BoxingSpecialist2 hasn’t stuck his hairy Bosniak nose into the forum for a while - and that’s a good thing. Perhaps he copped the jack from one of his basement budget whores and now spends more time scratching than typing. Or maybe he’s being fitted for a suicide vest. If that’s the case, I sure hope its tailoring is superior to that of his suit jackets…

With Real Madrid trailing 2-0 (but leading on aggregate) Benzema did well to get the ball inside leading to the goal that ended the tie. Frederic38 won't be happy that Benzema is being declared the great hero. To be fair, he showed some good skills but the defending was panicky and amateurish - I don't know what the third Atletico player to the fray was doing:

So yet another boringly predictable season has drawn to a close. Real Madrid retained the title, winning their twelfth European Cup / Champions League - which is also their third in four years. Once again, the final was contested by clubs from the “Big Four” leagues (Spain, Italy, England, Germany) - just like it has been every year since 2004, when Portugal’s FC Porto beat France’s AS Monaco by three goals to nil.

Back in August I went through the annual ritual of confirming my ever-dwindling interest in the Champions League during a conversation with my best mate about the upcoming tournament. My friend still gets excited about football (probably because he bets - and loses - frighteningly large sums of money on it…) but I simply proffered my standard opinion that there’s no point in paying more than cursory attention to a “competition” in which 78 teams take part yet the same small handful of big-money and big-influence clubs reach the quarterfinals with grinding inevitability, year in, year out.

I expanded by blandly stating that come March, the final eight would almost surely consist of Real Madrid, Barcelona, Atletico Madrid, Juventus, Bayern Munich, and Borussia Dortmund with the remaining two spots being filled by clubs from England, France, or Spain. I can assure everyone that I’m not a seer but when March rolled around the quarterfinalists just happened to be (insert drum roll…) Real Madrid, Barcelona, Atletico Madrid, Juventus, Bayern Munich, Borussia Dortmund, AS Monaco, and Leicester City. The presence of the latter club provided the only “revelation” - and it’s quite safe to say that Leicester shall in all probability never make another Champions League appearance in any of our lifetimes, let alone reach the quarterfinals.

While we’re at it, we might as well mention the Europa League, a competition which - given its structure - should surely be sponsored by parachute manufacturers and recycling companies. The Europa League’s sole serious point of interest is provided by the winner being granted a place in the following season’s Champions League tournament. In that context, Manchester United’s 2-0 win over Ajax Amsterdam was worth a potential fortune to the English club, who finished a miserable sixth in the Premier League. The final provided another, er, “showcase” of White players…

Manchester United started six Whites (with not a single Englishman among them…), four blacks, and one Arab. Ajax started five Whites (including a “whopping” three Dutchmen), four blacks, and two Arabs. United’s goals were scored by possibly the most over-rated and over-hyped player of all time - i.e., Paul “Yet To Achieve His Potential” Pogba - and the Armenian Henrikh Mkhitaryan.

It doesn't seem that long ago when teams like Ajax Amsterdam or FC Porto (ie teams from smaller countries) could make it to the final rounds of the European Cup. I'm not a total stick in the mud; I understand that times change. But the whole structure of European football is now just a sporting representation of the 1%er economics of the West as a whole.

Jose Mourinho used to mock teams that played for the Europa Cup (or whatever it is called; no one actually cares) but suddenly he's saying it's important to win it. Yeah, right. The only thing that matters is getting into the Champions League. At this point they might as well just move the top "clubs" (ie corporations) into a Super League and leave the national leagues to the smaller corporations, clubs I mean, to waste time playing domestic football. At least then the teams that get the most points would win the European championship, instead of the half-league half-knockout tournament they have now.

there’s no point in paying more than cursory attention to a “competition” in which 78 teams take part yet the same small handful of big-money and big-influence clubs reach the quarterfinals with grinding inevitability, year in, year out.

Click to expand...

Couldn't have put it any better.I only came to know of the winner a good three days after the final,that too when something related to it came up in my twitter feed.Now that I am no longer in England("Surprise!",I guess),Soccer isn't too hard to avoid.Thankfully,I must add,considering its present state.

In fact,your post made me feel nostalgic about F365,and I just discovered that Arsenal finally dropped out of the top four.But I doubt the crazy,senile scrooge will leave anytime soon.

At this point they might as well just move the top "clubs" (ie corporations) into a Super League and leave the national leagues to the smaller corporations, clubs I mean, to waste time playing domestic football. At least then the teams that get the most points would win the European championship, instead of the half-league half-knockout tournament they have now.

Click to expand...

The time will come.The jews will be more than happy to whore out European football to the Arabs,Chinese etc.

And finally,I am delighted to announce that Islam Slimani,a favourite of the now seemingly absent BS2,has been a major flop at Leicester.God knows what they were thinking spending 30m on a 29 year old Arab.

Murica,where else?Mexifornia in fact,though I won't get more specific so as to not doxx myself.

And boy is this place living up to its name!Its full of wogs.It also has the highest number of jews per-capita outside of Israel,NYC and of course they own everything and their new-found favourite wogs i.e. Indians and East Asians run this place,and they are able to do this only because,unlike whites,they don't have to bow their heads to our SJW jewgod Moloch.Most whites here are really not that much higher on the evolutionary ladder either,for they believe the relatively cheap,tasty mexican food and easy latina ass they now get makes up for the destruction of their state.

Then there's ******* aids-ridden homeless people everywhere,due to which going out at night in anything but your own car is as safe as taking a trip to the refugee camp of Calais.Everything costs twice as much as in the rest of The USA,because the spics leech on the state's finances and the level of degeneracy here is quite simply off the charts.I mean we have Porn Valley right here.

That there is so much money to be made(which is why I am here) in this barely functioning state boggles my mind...