Recently, RSS satellite scientists decided they needed to proactively adjust atmospheric temperatures in order to rid the world of the widely reported global warming hiatus. It’s a pause of insignificant warming that has existed since the major El Ni√±o of 1998 that the 2015 El Ni√±o recently stopped.

Thus, they produced a new study refuting their previous reported satellite temperature measurements for the mid-troposphere going back to 1979.

For the period from 1979 to 1997 (see left chart), these scientists saw little need for major adjustments to their earlier RSS dataset. Yet for the global warming pause period stretching from 1998 to 2014, significant adjustments (see right chart) apparently had to be made, stat.

The charts comparing the RSS old and new datasets of monthly observations includes the plot of simple 5-year averages (60 months). The obvious RSS cherry-picked adjustments of the post-1998 period versus the earlier period is clarified by the presentation of the ‘old’ and ‘new’ 5-year averages.

So, Carl Mears of RSS chose a specific start point and a specific endpoint to apply significant man-made adjustments to, which is clearly a blatant cherry-picked fabrication to produce a desired politically correct “empirical” objective, no?

It would seem this is politically correct anti-science at its worst on bold exhibit by RSS.

(And if you don’t believe RSS is a politically correct, anti-science outfit, then you might not be aware that they refer to their science critics as ‘denialists‘, a premeditated slander.)

The end result?

The study now identifies a higher global warming trend that they were previously unable to find with the best satellite technology available as a resource. Of course, for their new research, they are still using the same technology – go fabricate figure.