The SitePoint Forums have moved.

You can now find them here.
This forum is now closed to new posts, but you can browse existing content.
You can find out more information about the move and how to open a new account (if necessary) here.
If you get stuck you can get support by emailing forums@sitepoint.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Okay, this will get an argument started pretty quickly. I personally use FP 2k and have used it since 97 and seen it gradually improve in all aspects. It doesn't produce as much bulky code as it used to (which may still be too much for you big nerds).

I'm still waiting to buy DW but the cash flow is currently pretty low. Heard good things about it, but everyone has thei opinion.

I tried GoLive out at a product demo at an expo and I was extremely impressed with the integration between GoLive and PhotoShop. It's also quite easy to use and is a worthy competitor.

Visual Interdev is my tool of choice for developing ASP applications and its power is unparalleled for ASP stuff.

I use HomeSite more for pure HTML coding (and fixing DreamWeaver's bloated JScript codes and cleaning up my own coding) and is an excellent complement to DreamWeaver (which is why it was previously bundled with DW).

DreamWeaver is what I use for 95% of my web work though, and it's perfect for all my needs.

I voted FrontPage. Now, this is totaly not because I am a Microsoft Fan or anything (believe me, I am NOT). I usualy work in dreamweaver since I like the look and feel of the Program. I voted for FP because of its ease of use in creating froms and the control over an entire site. But the onl thing that bothers me about FP is that it does edit you alot into your HTML, which is something I despise since I am a hardcore HTML programmer and I like having complete control over my Site.
Sorry to all the anti-microsoft buddys, I am with you, its just that I can work faster with it. And anyway, I dont use those editors too much since I like to write the site myself.

The only reason Visual InterDev is losing is no one has that kind of cash to pay for a great product. It gets my vote. The price is high, but you'll never meet anything better. I can almost guaruntee it.

On the 5th of Feb 2001 NetObjects announced it had sold it's 10 millionth copy of NetObjects Fusion and you FORGOT to include it!
It is the only true wysiwyg software of it's kind.
DreamWeaver doesn't even come close in a comparison of ease of use. While daydreamweaver users are still setting up the dir structure of the site a NOF user is just going through the process of submitting his site to the search engines

It's fine to discuss what we like and don't like about each one, but it's kind of silly to insist that one or the other is the best/worst, etc. For me, I wouldn't like a "true" WYSIWG, but on the other hand, I don't care for typing in all the code and frankly I need a visual aid to help keep track of tables, although I don't nest them as deep as that sounds. I think a lot has to do with how your mind works. Dreamweaver has been the best fit for me, but other people have other opinions, of course. The fact that Dreamweaver is ahead in this poll shouldn't be a surprise. It's a very popular application, but for those who march to a different drummer, that's fine, too.