The Titus Arch in
Rome that celebrates the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD by Titus as
Matthew 24 prophesied.

The signs of Matthew 24
prophecies the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD not the second coming and
certainly not some "Rapture" theology that was invented in 1830 AD by
John Darby. When Christians saw the signs, they fled the city and were saved.

Introduction:

1.Those who teach the rapture
irresponsibly mislead their followers into believing that there are more
earthquakes today than in past centuries.

2.The idea they try to promote is that
we are in the end times and one of the proofs, is that there is a spike of
earthquakes since Israel became a nation in 1948 AD.

3.This interesting scientific data
file proves that earthquakes have not been any more common in the last one
hundred years.

4.This file is specifically directed
at Jehovah's Witnesses and their ridiculous
"invisible second coming in 1914" doctrine, but when it comes to
Premillennialism Jehovah's Witnesses are no different than mainline evangelical
churches.

5.They both stand or fall together. TV
evangelists, like Jack Van Impe,
are false teachers when they misuse the obviously fulfilled signs of Matthew 24
to predict the coming rapture!

6.So enjoy this file! Buy the book
either from the bookstore or directly from the authors as listed below! So next
time you hear some TV evangelist or your pastor excitedly saying that the end
is near because earthquakes have increased this century, print this file and
give it to him! see also: Rapture & Premillennialism
Refuted

7.You can see from the summary graph
that the science proves there is no increase in earth quakes.

WHAT ARE the facts about earthquakes in our
time? Is our planet Earth shaking with greater frequency and intensity than
ever before in human history?

As we have seen, in The
Late Great Planet Earth, Hal Lindsey listed this as one of the signs
marking the time for Christ's setting up his Kingdom. (Pages 52, 53) Again in The
Promise, he states that Jesus "warned that earthquakes would
increase in frequency and intensity as this old earth prepared for its final
cataclysm." (Page 198) This piece of the prophetic "jigsaw
puzzle" is supposed to have come into place in our day.

In his book Good-bye
Planet Earth (1976), Seventh Day Adventist author Robert H. Pierson has a
subheading "A Shaking, Quaking Planet." Under it he states:

With
increasing frequency and intensity Mother Earth has been shaking and quaking.
Hundreds of thousands of people have lost their lives. Multiplied thousands
more will perish in greater earth spasms ahead. Never since the days of Noah
has the world been so badly battered.

Again God
is speaking to us - He is seeking to tell us that our time is short. His Son,
Jesus Christ, will return soon. Nature's voice speaks through the floods, the
storms, the earthquakes. (Pages 21, 22)

He then quotes Jesus' words
at Luke chapter twenty-one, verse 11, as evidence of this.

The most remarkable and
detailed claims in this regard, however, are those made by the Governing Body
of Jehovah's Witnesses and their Watch Tower Society. Maintaining that Christ's
statement regarding "great earthquakes" (Luke chapter 21, verse 11)
has seen its true fulfillment only since 1914, the Watch Tower Society claims
that we have experienced an enormous increase in such earthquakes since that
year:

The
frequency of major earthquakes has increased about 20 times what it was
on an average during the two thousand years before 1914. - Survival into a
New Earth (1984), page 23.

This is a fantastic claim.
It is really possible to prove such a statement? How much is actually known
about earthquake activity in the past? Are ancient records on earthquakes
complete enough to allow for reliable comparisons with our century? And what is
meant by a "great" earthquake? What determines its 'greatness'?

To be able to assess
accurately the claims of the Watch Tower Society, we must first seek an answer
to these questions.

Recording
earthquake activity

The Greek word for
"shaking" and (when it applies to the earth) "earthquake"
is seismós. The science of earthquakes, therefore, is called seismology.

Seismology is a very young
branch of science. "Not . . . until the early 1850s did the first true
seismologist, as we would recognize the term, appear on the scene. He was an
Irishman, Robert Mallet."1 After him came John Milne, called
"the father of seismology."2 In 1880 he invented the first
proper seismograph, and from the end of the last century a fairly
accurate recording of earthquakes has been possible.3

Consequently seismologists
are able to present a complete list of the great earthquakes that have occurred
on earth from 1903 onward.4 With further improvement of the
seismograph an increasing number of countries have adopted its use. But not
until the end of the 1950's did this observation network reach a global scale.5
Since then it has been possible to record and measure all earthquakes, small
and major, all over the globe.

It is not an easy matter to
compare the complete list of great earthquakes recorded in our century
by modern seismologists with that of past centuries. This is because of the
comparatively scanty and incomplete information available from earlier
centuries. Historical sources become more and more sparse the farther back in
time we go. Even of modern records, seismologist A. W Lee in 1939 wrote:

The
statistics are complete enough to give a fair representation of the
distribution of the earthquakes which now occur, but, since they extend over
less than half a century, are insufficient for showing whether there has been
any secular change in the frequency.6

Another factor that
considerably limits our knowledge of ancient earthquakes is that most
earthquakes take place outside Europe, the source of most of our
information for the greater part of history from the first century to the
"Age of Discovery" in the fifteenth century. The Encyclopedia
Americana tells us that:

Roughly 80
percent of the seismic energy of the world is released in a belt which girdles
the Pacific Ocean. A secondary belt, starting in the Mediterranean area and
running easterly across Asia, is the scene of earthquakes which represent over
15 percent of the seismic energy of the world.7

"Western
Europe" writes
Vemey, "might be considered almost a stable zone by comparison with the
hectic earthquake history of the Andes or elsewhere on the Ring of Fire [the
Pacific Ocean belt]."8

As the historical source
material for past centuries is, with a few important exceptions, limited to
Europe and the Mediterranean area, it is easily realized what this means. What
do we, for instance, know about the "hectic earthquake" activity in
North, Middle and South America before Columbus? John Milne points out: "The
records before the Christian era, and prior to the year 1700, are practically
confined to occurrences in Southern Europe, China and Japan."9
In our own century, the majority of the most destructive earthquakes

have occurred in areas outside
Europe and in most cases in areas from which no historical records of past
occurrences are available for comparison. The Watch Tower Society, either by
choice or otherwise, takes not a single one of these vital factors into
consideration when making its remarkable claim.

What
constitutes a "great" earthquake?

According to Luke's
rendering of Jesus' words to his disciples there would be "great
earthquakes." (Luke 21:11) What is meant by a "great"
earthquake?

Modern seismologists
measure the size of an earthquake according to certain scales. The one in
common use today is the so-called Richter scale, devised by C. F.
Richter in 1935. This scale measures the total amount of energy released
in seismic waves during an earthquake. Earthquakes measuring 7.0 or more on the
scale are termed "major," while those measuring 8.0 and over are
termed "great." 10 It should be noted that the
"magnitude" of an earthquake on this scale has little to do with the
number of casualties:

There is
usually no clear correlation between the magnitude of a shock and the number of
people killed or other destruction. An earthquake may be destructive but not
large. 11

Similarly an earthquake may
be large but not destructive of life. The earthquake in Owens Valley,
California, in 1872, for example, is said to have been the greatest earthquake
in the United States in the past 150 years, in that it is estimated to have had
a magnitude of 8.3 on the Richter scale. Yet only 27 persons were killed, as
the area was very thinly populated. 12

How common are
"major" earthquakes, measured by the standard of the Richter scale?

It has been
calculated that every year there will be two earthquakes of 7.7 magnitude or
greater; seventeen between 7.0 and 7.7; one hundred between 6.0 and 7.0; and no
less than fifty thousand between 3.0 and 4.0. 13

The number of
"major" earthquakes, then, are, according to these calculations, about
19-20 per year. Do we have any indication that the "major" (7.0
and more in magnitude) and "great" (8.0 and more) earthquakes have
increased in number and magnitude during the period it has been possible to
measure them instrumentally, that is, since the end of the last century onward?

If we were to believe a
recent claim by the Worldwide Church of God, an increasingly vocal organization
proclaiming the speedy end of the age, the answer would be 'Yes.' On page 7 of
the April, 1986, issue of its monthly The Good News of the World Tomorrow, Norman
L. Shoaf, a spokesman of the movement, confidently asserted:

Did you
know that from 1901 to 1944, during more than four decades, only three
earthquakes measured magnitude 7 or over? . . . Then, in just 10 years from
1945 to 1954, the number leaped to 21 quakes measuring 7 or over. From then on,
large earthquakes have increased dramatically. From 1955 to 1964 - in just one
decade - 87 earthquakes measured 7 or over; from 1965 to 1974, 136; from 1975
to 1984, 133.

It would be a charitable
understatement to say that this claim is simply nonsensical. When confronted
with this claim, Professor Seweryn J. Duda, a renowned seismologist at the
University of Hamburg, West Germany, wrote that "In the time 1901-1944
about 1000 (one thousand) earthquakes with magnitude 7 or over have taken place
worldwide." In fact, his letter to the authors dated July 7, 1986,
contradicted the entire statement of the Worldwide Church of God. See Appendix
A for the complete text of his letter.

The simple fact, then, is
that no such unique increases have been observed, either since 1914 or at any
other subsequent point of this century. Actually, the evidence produced by
modern seismologists indicates the contrary.

Charles F. Richter, former
President of the Seismological Society of America and the originator of the
"Richter scale," made reference to this evidence in an article
published in the December 1969 issue of Natural History magazine:

One notices
with some amusement that certain religious groups have picked this rather
unfortunate time to insist that the number of earthquakes is increasing. In
part they are misled by the increasing number of small earthquakes that are
being catalogued and listed by newer, more sensitive stations throughout the
world. It is worth remarking that the number of great [that is, 8.0 and over on
the Richter scale] earthquakes from 1896 to 1906 (about twenty-five) was
greater than in any ten-year interval since. 14

Parts of this statement
were quoted disapprovingly on page 72 of The Watchtower of February 1,
1974 - without the reader being informed that it came from a leading authority
on seismology. Jesus was not speaking of any "ten-year interval,"
said The Watchtower, but of a whole "generation."

Dr. Richter's statement,
however, was aimed at demonstrating that the claimed increase in the
earthquake activity during our century finds no support in the recorded
seismological data during the period of instrumentally measured
seismicity, which covers the period from 1896, or more particularly from 1903
onward.

Still, his statement was
made back in 1969. What, then, of this claim found on page 30 of the book The
1980's - Countdown to Armageddon, by Hal Lindsey?

The 1970's
experienced the largest increase in the number of quakes known to history. In
fact, the dramatic increase in quakes in 1976 led many scientists to say we are
entering a period of great seismic disturbances.

This statement has no more
basis in fact that do those of the Watch Tower Society and the Worldwide Church
of God. More recent statistics published by other seismologists, who have
carefully and objectively examined the matter, not only confirm the accuracy of
Dr. Richter's statement, but show that it continued to be true into the 1970's.

In 1965 the well-known
seismologist Seweryn J. Duda published a catalog of the major earthquakes for
the period 1897-1964. In 1979 this catalog was updated to include the period
1965-1977 in an article written by the same author jointly with professor
Markus Båith, another seismologist of worldwide repute. Their very thorough
study shows that during this eighty-year period (1897-1977) about twenty (19.94
to be exact) major earthquakes occurred annually. Any change in the number of
earthquakes with a magnitude of 7.0 and above on the Richter scale could not be
demonstrated for the period after 1914, compared to the period before that
date. As to the magnitude of the quakes, on the other hand, their study
revealed that the first twenty years of our century (1900-1920) had about twice
as great an energy release per year as the whole period thereafter up to
1977!15

The table on page 54,
published in 1912 (for the years 1899 to 1909), gives some idea of the high
seismicity recorded in the period previous to 1914. For the period before the
beginning of our century reliable instrumental data are missing, as was pointed
out earlier.

What is the conclusion to
be drawn from this very careful study of the period from which reliable
instrumental recordings are available? It is this: No marked change in the number
of major earthquakes may be demonstrated during the period from 1897 to
1977. On the other hand, the study shows the frequence of the greatest earthquakes
to have been considerably higher in the first twenty years of this period than
in the sixty years that followed!

Efforts
to Overcome the Evidence

It goes without saying
that, on being confronted with these scientific statistics, the Watch Tower
Society takes no great delight in the measurements of the seismologists. The
Society's tendency has been to reject them altogether when making statistical
comparisons on earth-quake activity before and after 1914, supplying instead a definition
of their own making as to what is meant by a "great" earthquake. We
read:

What is it
that makes an earthquake 'great'? Is it not its effect on lives and property?
But modern earthquake students tend to consider an earth quake 'great' only if
it rates high on the Richter scale, which rates 'magnitude,' the power or force
a quake releases.16

Even 1976 did not see the
'dramatic increase in quakes' claimed by Hal Lindsey, despite the great
earthquake in China that year. Professor Markus Båth, in his Introduction to
Seismology, says: "The year 1976 deserves a special comment. Numerous
earthquake dis-asters occurred throughout the year, with maximum number of
casualties in China.... On the other hand, looking at 1976 from a purely
seismological point of view, there were not more or stronger earthquakes this
year than in average." (P. 151) Commenting on the period after 1976,
Professor Båth, in a private letter, adds: "The years after 1976 until now
[1985], at least, have shown a clear decline in the seismic activity of the
earth, both with respect to the number of great earthquakes (high magnitudes,
over 7.0) and the number of quake victims. But this is, of course, just an
example of an occasional variation that has always occurred." (Private
letter Båth-Jonsson, dated August 21, 1985.)

Megaseismic
Frequency.

Between
1899 and 1909 the number of very large earthquakes recorded was not less than
976.
Many of these where recorded at stations all over the world, others over the
whole of the Northern Hemisphere, and none of them disturbed an area less
than that of Europe and Asia.

The
numbers recorded in successive months were as follow:-

Year

J

F

M

A

M

J

J

A

S

O

N

D

Total

1899

9

5

9

4

3

6

7

7

12

4

7

4

75

1900

7

3

3

2

3

4

2

4

5

6

5

3

47

1901

7

4

8

4

4

3

0

9

0

6

11

6

67

1902

12

7

9

8

4

2

4

11

8

3

6

3

77

1903

10

11

7

4

8

8

5

5

8

9

6

10

91

1904

4

2

8

9

5

8

6

8

7

6

5

6

74

1905

7

11

10

7

6

8

11

3

7

6

5

5

86

1906

14

18

20

11

4

9

5

22

12

10

8

7

140

1907

8

4

9

6

12

9

7

7

5

10

10

7

94

1908

4

6

11

5

8

4

4

32

9

8

13

6

90

1909

9

10

11

14

11

14

8

13

13

15

8

9

135

91

81

103

74

68

75

59

100

92

83

84

66

976

275

217

251

233

Winter months 508

970

Summer months 468

Seismologist
F. M. Walker in Report of the Eighteenth Meeting of the British Association
for the Advancement of Science, London 1912, pages 38 and 39. The
expression "very large," here has no reference to the Richter scale,
which was not in use at that time.

The Watch Tower Society,
thus, prefers to measure the magnitude of an earthquake in the number of
deaths caused. It states:

One way to prove
clearly that the generation since 1914 is unusual as far as earthquakes are
concerned is to consider how many deaths they have caused. 17

Some reflection will soon
reveal why the Watch Tower Society would prefer this method of reckoning the
'greatness' of earthquakes. It contains several flaws of which most persons are
unaware, and the claims of the Society depend on that fact for their
appearance of authenticity. When the false premises upon which the Society
bases its arguments are clearly seen, however, their statistics lose their
impressiveness. Consider:

First, as was pointed out
earlier, data on earthquakes and death figures are much sparser from past
centuries due to the fragmentary historical sources, which moreover, previous
to the year 1700, "are practically confined to occurrences in Southern
Europe, China and Japan." So the idea that completely accurate comparisons
can be made between modern-day and historic earthquake death figures is simply
not true.

Second, the rapid population
growth and urbanization in our century has very reasonably increased the number
of deaths in great earthquakes, particularly when these have hit densely
populated areas. An increase in the number of deaths, then, would not be a
valid indicator of an increase in the number of "great earthquakes."
We may also rightly ask: Did Jesus, in referring to "great
earthquakes." actually speak of an increase either in the number of quakes
or the number of victims? His simple statement was that, along with war, famine
and pestilence, "there will be great earthquakes." Anything beyond
that is human assumption, a reading into his words more than they actually say.

Despite their choice of
death figures in preference to seismological measurements, when it suits their
argumentation the Watch Tower Society does not hesitate to quote statements
about earthquakes that are based on the Richter scale-without telling their
readers that they are doing so. For example, the very same issue of the Watchtower
(February 1, 1974) quoted above presents a long string of statements on
earthquakes occurring since 1914, the statements said to be taken from
"highly respected reference works" (though no references are given):

China
(1920), 'one of the most appalling catastrophes in history.' Japan (1923), 'the
worst disaster in [Japan's] history.' Pakistan (1935), 'one of the greatest
earthquakes of history.' El Salvador (1951), 'the most destructive quake in El
Salvador's history.' Egypt (1955), 'Egypt experienced the worst earthquake in
its history.' Afghanistan (1956), 'believed to he the worst in the history of
the country.' Chile (1960), 'no earthquake in history has ever had a greater
range than this.' Alaska (1964), 'the largest earthquake ever recorded in North
America.' Peru (1970), 'the worst natural disaster on record in the Western
Hemisphere.'18

But the reader is not
informed that expressions such as "largest," "worst,"
"greatest" and so forth in these statements in several cases do not
refer to the number of deaths in these earthquakes, and at least in some
cases clearly refer to the Richter scale which this same article has said
should not be the means of measuring earthquake "greatness"!

Thus the earthquake in
Alaska in 1964 - "the largest earthquake ever recorded in North
America" - took only 114 (some sources say 131) lives, although it had a
very great magnitude of 8. 5 on the Richter scale! 19

The phrase "the
largest . . . ever recorded" further limits the time of comparison
to the period during which earthquakes have been measured instrumentally, that
is, from the end of the last century onward. Some of the earthquakes included
were not "great" on any count, neither according to Richter's scale,
nor in the number of lives lost. What is called the "most destructive quake
in El Salvador's history" had a magnitude of only 6.5 and took 400 lives
(according to another source 1,100 lives), while the claimed "worst
earthquake in [Egypt's] history" had a magnitude of 6.3 and took just 18
lives!20

Several of the statements
quoted are certainly not scientific descriptions. They rather reflect
sensation-rousing newspaper headlines created during the immediate impact of
the catastrophe. Although some of the earthquakes mentioned (China 1920, Japan
1923, Pakistan 1935, and Peru 1970) were indeed very great and claimed
thousands of lives, most seismologists would certainly be hesitant to term any
of them the "worst" or "greatest" in the history of the
country in question.

Quite recently the Watch
Tower Society has come up with a new definition of a "great"
earthquake. According to the Awake! magazine of October 22, 1984, its
latest statistical calculations are now said to include earthquakes that meet
at least one of the following qualifications:

Magnitude7.5 or more on the Richter scale

Deaths100 or more

Damage$5 million (U.S.) or
more in property destroyed.

These standards for
measuring "greatness" are also used in the 1985 Watch Tower Society
publication Reasoning from the Scriptures, page 236.

Surprisingly, the Richter
scale, previously rejected, has now been introduced to play an important role
in their statistics. On a closer look at their calculations, the reason soon
becomes apparent. While seismologists properly make comparisons based on the
Richter scale only for the period during which earthquakes have been measured instrumentally,
that is, by seismograph since the end of the last century, the Watch Tower
Society elects to include the past 2000 years in its comparisons! This
allows for a very biased comparison. How so?

While it is true that
seismologists have estimated magnitudes for many great earthquakes of
the past, for the bulk of destructive earthquakes before A.D. 1900 such
estimates are missing.21 All these destructive earthquakes obviously
would fail to meet the first criterion set up by the Watch Tower Society - no
matter how great in magnitude they actually may have been!22 And if
they do not meet at least one of the other two criteria, they are conveniently
excluded from the calculations altogether!

As to the second criterion,
it has already been pointed out that death figures are often missing in ancient
records, especially if the losses amounted to only some hundreds or less. In
fact, many severe earthquakes that involved relatively few fatalities may have
been completely ignored in the early records. This can only mean that countless
"qualified" earthquakes in the past have been excluded by the
Society's arbitrarily set standards of comparison!

The same holds true for
damage, the third criterion set up by the Watch Tower Society. Damages are far
better known for modern earthquakes than for the earlier ones.23
Besides that, since there are manifold more buildings nowadays - and larger and
more sophisticated ones at that - a comparison of the sort carried out by the
Watch Tower Society of necessity must clearly do injustice to any comparison
with the past. This is stressed by N. N. Ambraseys, who is professor of
Engineering Seismology at Imperial College of Science and Technology in London.
He says that,

. . . the
exact repetition of an old earthquake at the present day will differ not only
in the type of structures damaged but also in the degree of damage. In some
cases modern structures will be more severely damaged than old buildings. A
distant large earthquake ten centuries ago would have caused practically no
damage in Istanbul, Ankara or Jerusalem; the same earthquake today would cause
damage to a large number of longperiod structures in these cities.24

Quite naturally, many earthquakes
in earlier times, although involving substantial damage, would fail to meet the
Watch Tower Society's purely arbitrary criterion of "$5 million or more in
property destroyed"

Obviously the new criteria
for "great earthquakes" suggested by the Watch Tower Society are
designed to qualify the largest number possible of the earthquakes after
1914 and to exclude as many as possible from the time previous to
that year. We are not at all surprised to find that calculations based on such
slanted and biased reasoning would appear to show an enormous increase
of "great" earthquakes in our century compared to earlier times. The Awake!
article just quoted concluded:

Since 1914
the yearly average of reported earthquakes has soared. There are 11 times the
number that there were, on an average, annually during the 1,000 years before
that date. And 20 times the annual average for the 2,000 years preceding 1914.25

The present world
seismological situation does not actually lend itself to such statistical
comparison with that of the past two millenia. This is because, as demonstrated
earlier, available data on earthquakes are much sparser from earlier centuries.
In fact, for whole continents data are completely lacking for the
greater part of the past two millenia, and especially previous to the year
1700. Similarly, it has only been in this century that tremors occurring in
oceanic beds or uninhabited regions could be recorded, yet it is in such
regions that the vast majority of high magnitude quakes occur.

It should also be observed
that the method of comparison used in the earlier-quoted calculation contains
another fraudulent element, not easily recognized by the unsuspecting reader.
By extending the pre-1914 period of comparison thousands of years back in time
to include the long ages of poor reporting of earthquakes, the Watch Tower
Society naturally gets a very low overall annual average, even for later
centuries when reporting actually increased. This conceals the large number of
severe earthquakes known from the latest centuries, leveling them out with the
aid of earlier centuries when reporting was poor. It is further concealed that
this method does not point to 1914 any more than to any other date within the
last 200-300 years. The choice of 1914 as the seismic "turning point"
is thus wholly arbitrary. It would be equally possible to use the identical
method to choose, for example, 1789, when the French Revolution started, or
1939, when World War II began and obtain similar results. Whatever date during
the last 200-300 years picked as a watershed would get the full advantage of
modern reporting following it, giving an apparent great increase in the annual
average.

It is safe to say that any
scientist who would slant and manipulate statistical data in this way in a
scholarly journal would be quickly exposed as a fraud. In a religious paper,
however, read by millions of unsuspecting people who feel that it might be a
sin to question their leaders, such calculations easily pass as if they were
firmly established facts.

When foretelling
"great earthquakes" Jesus, quite evidently did not have in mind any
modern standard, such as magnitudes on the Richter scale or a certain minimum
of fatalities or damages calculated according to modern money standards. The
Watch Tower Society's use of such standards does not appeal to us, as it should
be natural for Christians first of all to turn to the Bible for clarification.
True, we do find that an earthquake damaging "a tenth of" a city and
killing "seven thousand persons" is termed "great" at
Revelation chapter eleven, verse thirteen. However, the two earthquakes
described as "great" at Matthew chapter twenty-eight, verse two, and
Acts chapter sixteen, verse twenty-six, are not shown to have caused any
appreciable damage, let alone any loss of life. Yet the Society accepts both of
these as proof that there was a "first-century fulfilment of Jesus'
words" regarding great earthquakes!26

From the Scriptures
themselves, then, it is only reasonable to conclude that Jesus spoke of
"great earthquakes" in a general sense, of tremors affecting - with
greater or lesser severity - people, property and landscape. He could not
reasonably have had in mind statistics of average numbers of annual deaths
before and after certain dates! Nonetheless, since such figures play a very
major role in the Society's calculations, we will now proceed to a closer look
at its statistics.

How
to "prove" by statistics

In an article entitled
"Can Statistics Mislead You?" the Awake! magazine of January
22, 1984, said on page 25:

Figures
don't lie, we are told. But be on guard. Honestly used, they can be very
informative and useful. However, statistics can also he presented in a way that
misleads you.

The examples presented
below will show that this warning has a pertinence that its writer probably did
not realize.

According to Awake!, February
22, 1961, page 7, the estimated number of annual deaths in earthquakes before
1914 was 5,000.

But in 1974 the Watch Tower
Society lowered that figure. The Watchtower of February 1 that year
cited a statement in the 1971 Nature/Science Annual, according to which
"more than three million people (possibly four million)" have died in
earthquakes during the past 1,000 years. Estimating that at least 900,000 of
these had died since 1914, the Society presented the following impressive
statistics (page 73):

Earthquake deaths each
year

Before 1914:

3,000

Since 1914:

15,000

These same statistics were
published again in Awake!, January 8, 1977 (pages 15, 16). However, the book Happiness
How to Find It, published in 1980, managed to "improve" the
figures considerably, as the table on page 149 shows:

Earthquake deaths

Up to 1914

1,800 a year

Since 1914

25,300 a year

That the number of annual
deaths could be increased in four years (from 1974 to 1980) to such an
extent-from 15,000 to 25,000 a year-is relatively simple to explain:

In 1976 China was hit by
the greatest killer earthquake in this century. Western newspapers, misled by a
premature report from Hong Kong, first put the death toll of the quake at
650,000 or more (some even said 800,000). If this figure is divided by the number
of years that had then passed since 1914 (62 years, from 1915 to 1976
inclusive), we get an average-from just this one earthquake-of close to 10,500
deaths a year. Thus a single great earthquake may create impressive statistics
for a whole generation! If we were to take in place of this earthquake the
great earthquake in China in 1556 which is listed as claiming about 830,000
victims, and then divide that death figure by the same number of years (62), we
would get an average of about 13,400 deaths a year from that one earthquake
alone.27 (Adding other disastrous earthquakes from that century would,
obviously, increase substantially the number of annual deaths during that
sixteenth century.)

The Watch Tower Society,
however, by its method of employing statistics, not only increased the annual
death rate after 1914 from 15,000 to 25,300. They also succeeded in reducing
the number of annual deaths before 1914 from 3,000 a year (according
to their statistics of 1974) to just 1,800 a year (according to their
statistics of 1980)! This is perplexing indeed. How did they arrive at this new
figure?

The answer is that the
latest (and lower) statistics were not based upon the estimated 3-4 million
victims of earthquakes during the past 1,000 years, as were the earlier Society
statistics, but upon a much smaller figure, 1,973,000 victims during a
period of 1,059 years. The extraordinary feature about this is that this new
figure is not some estimate made by any modern seismologist-it is a figure
which the Watch Tower Society itself has created by adding up the number of deaths
in only 24 major earthquakes, selected_from among literally thousands of
destructive quakes that took place in the 1,059 years before 1914!

The new figure first
appeared in the Awake! magazine of February 22, 1977, page 11. In
connection with a list of 43 earthquakes from the period of 1915-1976, it
stated:

Interestingly,
for a period of 1,059 years (856 to 1914 C.E.), reliable sources list only 24
major earthquakes, with 1,972,952 fatalities. But compare that with the
accompanying partial list citing 43 instances of earthquakes, in which
1,579,209 persons died during just the 62 years from 1915 to 1976 C.E.. . . .
The dramatic upsurge in earthquake activity since 1914 helps to prove that we
are now living in the time of Jesus' presence.

The statement that
'reliable sources list only 24 major earthquakes for the 1,059 years from 856
to 1914' is so far from the truth that it is almost impossible to understand
how anyone with even an elementary knowledge of the subject could make such a
statement. The fact is that reliable sources list literally thousands of
destructive earthquakes during this period! (The evidence of this will be
discussed in the last section of this chapter.) And this is
by no means the end of the matter. The writer of the Awake! article
takes those 24 pre-1914 earthquakes and seeks to make a comparison between them
and earthquakes in the 62 years following 1914. But whereas the 24 earlier
earthquakes were all major catastrophes, they are now compared with a modern
list that includes both great and small disasters (some have death
figures of 52, 65, 115, 131, and so on).

This unequal method of
comparison is either the result of sheer carelessness or of deliberate bias and
manipulation of fact. And, to further add to the distorted picture, the writer
describes his post-1914 list as "partial." thus implying that the 24
major earthquakes allotted to the 1,059 years before 1914 is a complete
number! With this the statement becomes so foreign to fact as to be almost
comical.28

Yet it is upon absurd
figures of this kind that the Watch Tower Society has built up its figures of
the average number of annual deaths before and after 1914 in its publications.29

The tendency is apparent.
In the statistics of the Watch Tower Society, whereas the number of annual
deaths after 1914 has been raised, the average number of annual deaths previous
to 1914 has been steadily shrinking, as follows:

Annual earthquake deaths
before 1914

Society statistics of
1961:

5,000 per year

Society statistics of
1974:

3,000 per year

Society statistics of
1980:

1,800 per year

If this trend were to
continue at the same rate for another 20 years, the annual death figure
previous to 1914 would be reduced to zero in the statistics of the Watch
Tower Society!

How many people have
actually died in earthquakes in past history? Due to the incomplete source
material no one can say with definite certainty and estimates vary .
"It has been estimated that over seven million people have lost their
lives in earthquakes" wrote Vemey.30 Another source states
that probably ten million have died in earthquakes since the time of Christ.31An outstanding seismologist, Professor Båth, however, says:

It has been
estimated that during historical time 50 to 80 (according to one estimate 74)
million people have lost their lives in earthquakes or their immediate
aftereffects, such as fires, landslides, tsunamis, etc.32

It is obvious, then, that
estimates of annual deaths in earthquakes in the past will be as divergent as
the guesses of the total death number upon which they are based. Population
growth is an important factor.

Since about half of the
world's population lives in the earthquake belts of the earth, it would
certainly not be surprising if the number of deaths in earthquakes kept pace
with the population growth in those areas. This would not constitute proof,
however, that earthquakes have increased either in numbers or severity.

Along with their figures
for pre-1914 earthquakes and their shifting death statistics, the Watch Tower
Society has published lists of earthquakes with death figures from the year
1914 onward. Interestingly, the death figures in these lists also seem to
change from one list to next, and they differ with authoritative reports in
several instances. A comparison between the two latest lists-published in the Awake!
ofFebruary 22, 1977, page 11, and in The Watchtower of May
15, 1983, page 7 - gives the following result:

Death
figures

Death
figures

according
to

according
to

Awake!

Watchtower

Earthquakes:

2/22/1977

5/15/1983:

1920, China

180,000

200,000

1939 Turkey

23,000

30,000

1950, India

1,500

20,000

1962, Iran

10,000

12,230

1972, Nicaragua

6,000

10,000

1976, China

655,235

800,000

Total:

875,735

1,072,230

As can be seen, the death
figures have been raised in the latest list by a total of nearly 200,000! This
does not mean that the figures have been deliberately falsified. Lists showing
deaths in earthquakes, published in different works, often vary. But the Watch
Tower Society's listings reveal a clear tendency to choose always the highest,
not the most reliable, figures in these works, evidently in an
attempt to present the earthquakes of the twentieth century as being as
"great" as possible, while the tendency to reduce the numbers
and size of the earthquakes before 1914 is equally apparent. This is not
an honest, objective use of data.

Actually, the most
authoritative works often present much lower figures than those given by the
Watch Tower Society in both of their post-1914 lists quoted above. The 1920
earthquake in China, which the Society lists as claiming 180,000 or 200,000
lives, according to the Encyclopedia Americana claimed about 100,000
victims 33 Likewise the great earthquake in China in 1976, which the
latest list of the Society shows as causing 800,000 deaths, in reality claimed
242,000 lives according to the figures released by the Chinese authorities!34
This lower figure is now generally believed by seismologists to be the correct
one.35 Inasmuch as the latest estimate of annual deaths in
earthquakes since 1914 published by the Society is based upon figures that
include a death toll of 650,000 for this quake, the correction mentioned here
reduces the actual death figure of the Society by as much as one third!36

The varying figures to be
found in different works clearly demonstrate what a hazardous task it is to try
to make any comparisons between earthquakes before and after 1914 based on
death figures. It also demonstrates how easy it is to create a seemingly
very impressive and convincing, but completely misleading, statistical
picture, simply by choosing only those figures that best support a preconceived
view from among the many different lists that have been published. To do this
reflects, at best, shallow research and irresponsible journalism; at worst,
deliberate deception.

How
to "prove" with quotations

The seismic activity in the
earth's crust is not quite constant. The activity seems to have had varying
cycles during different periods in the past, with periods of greater activity
and periods of lesser activity. The evidence is, however, that in a longer
perspective the activity has been stable. The above-mentioned fluctuations,
then, are only minor variations in the overall pattern. Some popular writers
feel that the earth is now going through one of the periods of increased
activity. "There are now indications that the planet Earth is moving into
an era of increasing earthquake activity," writes Vemey.37

But it is doubtful if any
seismologists would agree with this. True, The Watchtower of May 15,
1983, claims that seismologist Keiiti Aki "speaks of 'the apparent surge
in intensity and frequency of major earthquakes during the last one hundred
years,' though stating that the period from 1500 through 1700 was as
active." (Page 6) It is difficult to see how such a statement can be
helpful to the Watch Tower Society since it embraces "the last one hundred
years." rather than the much shorter period following 1914.

However, the true significance
of Professor Aki's statement was obviously glossed over by the Watch Tower
Society. In his letter to the Watch Tower Society, Professor Aki did not indicate
that there had been a real or actual increase in the earthquake activity
during the last one hundred years. His full statement was:

The
apparent surge in intensity and frequency of major earthquakes during the last
one hundred years is, in all probability, due to improved recording of
earthquakes and the increased vulnerability of human society to earthquake
damage. (Letter from Keiiti Aki to the Watch Tower Society, dated 30 September
1982. A copy of this letter is reproduced in Appendix A [in printed edition].)

From that letter it is
clear that the Watchtower magazine misused the information supplied to
them. Professor Aki's letter to the Watch Tower Society shows that when
referring to "the apparent surge in intensity and frequency of major
earthquakes" he clearly used the term "apparent" in the sense of
a seeming surge, not in the sense of that which is evident or
noticeable. For he stated in the same sentence that such "apparent"
surge was "in all probability, due to the improved recording of
earthquakes and the increased vulnerability of human society to earthquake
damages." The Watch Tower Society saw fit to drop this portion, thereby
giving to the quoted phrase a meaning that it does not have.

The true standpoint of
Professor Aki is that there has been no increase at all in earthquake activity
in our century, and that the seismicity of the earth has been stationary for
milleniums. In a private letter to the authors, dated September 5, 1985,
Professor Aki explains:

I feel
strongly that the seismicity has been stationary for thousands of years. I was
trying to convince Jehovah's Witnesses about the stationarity of the
seismicity, using the data obtained in China for the period 1500 through 1700,
but they put only weak emphasis in the published statement. (For the entirety
of this letter, see Appendix A [in printed edition].)

Obviously, then, The
Watchtower quoted Professor Aki in a way that concealed his true position
and views. As Professor Aki, on being confronted with the Watch Tower Society's
use of his letter, remarked, "it is clear that they quoted the part they
wanted, eliminating my main message," namely that the seismicity
has been essentially stable, with no increase. (Letter from Keiiti Aki to the
authors, dated June 16, 1986.)

Regrettably, it must be
said that this method of "proving" a case is in no way exceptional in
the publications of this movement, as the following additional examples
demonstrate.

In September 1950 the Scientific
American magazine published a brief news item on earthquake activity. Parts
of this have been quoted in Watch Tower publications, time and again, for about
twenty years, as the principal proof of their claim that great
earthquakes have increased in numbers since 1914. The sentences cited by the
Watch Tower Society are:

Major
quakes used to occur in clusters, each period of activity being followed by a
rest period.... But the periods of activity became progressively shorter and
closer together. Since 1948 the pattern has entered a new phase with
approximately one great quake a year.38

The nature of the
"global force" that controls this orderly pattern is unknown. One
speculation is that periodic increases in the earth's rate of spin due to
slight changes in the tidal forces of the sun and moon may enlarge the earth,
opening it's seams sufficiently to release the accumulated tensions. Scientific
American, September 1950, page 48.

These sentences, isolated
from their context, strongly convey the impression of an increase in the
number of major earthquakes in our century, and especially since 1948. A
careful examination of the whole news item, however, gives quite another
impression. For the reader's benefit, we present the news item above in its
entirety.

Does the news item actually
claim that major earthquakes have increased in number since 1948? Does it say
they have been more violent or destructive since that date? No, it does not. It
refers to a study of a special type of great earthquakes, "the highly
destructive shallow quakes, which take place less than 45 miles below
the earth's surface." Forty-eight quakes of this kind had occurred between
1904 and 1950, that is, about one such quake a year, on the average. But
while they earlier used to occur in clusters, followed by a rest period, the
pattern entered a new phase in 1948, "with approximately one great
quake [that is, of 8.0 magnitude or more] a year." Thus the average
number of earthquakes was still the same.

To illustrate, if in a
ten-year period a cluster of four great earthquakes occurred in the first year,
another cluster of three in the sixth year, and a third cluster of three in the
tenth, with the intervening years being years of quiet, the total number would
be ten great earthquakes in the ten-year period. This would be the same as if
there had been one great earthquake each year during the ten-year period. The
total number would be the same in either case.

The Scientific American news
item itself clearly shows that no increase in either the total number or
size of earthquakes had occurred. Only by quoting two or three sentences
out of context was it possible to create the opposite impression.

According to the study of
seismologists Båth and Duda, mentioned earlier, about 20 major (7.0 or more in
magnitude) earthquakes a year have occurred from 1897 to 1977. No marked change
in that pattern could be demonstrated for this whole period, except that the
frequency of the greatest earthquakes was almost twice as great before 1920,
compared to the whole period thereafter up to 1977. The "new phase"
mentioned in the Scientific American of September 1950, then, must have
been a comparatively trivial episode in the larger pattem.39

In spite of this, the
sentences quoted out of context by the Watch Tower Society have been used, time
and again, in an attempt to "prove" that earthquake activity entered
a new and more violent phase in 1948, and that this phase has
persisted since. In the long run, of course, the Scientific American item
of September 1950 could not be dusted off every time this need to be
"proved."40

This figure shows the
annual number of great shallow quakes of 1897-1979 measuring 7.8 or
above on the Richter scale. These are usually the most destructive quakes,
especially when they hit densely inhabited areas. The great earthquake that
struck Mexico City on September 19, 1985, belongs to this category. About 2.1
quakes of this type occur each year on the average. No increase in the number
of such quakes has been observed in our century. As regards those who would
designate 1914 a turning point, the fact is that the number was highest in
the pre-1914 period! (K. Abe & H. Kanamori in Tectonophysics, Vol.
62, 1980, p. 196.)

A
new "evidence" advanced

By 1978 the statement in Scientific
American magazine had been used for about twenty years as the Watch Tower
Society's principal or only neutral "proof" of the claimed
increase in earthquake activity since 1914. In 1978, however, another
"evidence" began to be quoted, one that has served as virtually the
only "neutral" source of proof since then. A closer scrutiny of the
source and dependability of this new evidence will give us yet another interesting
lesson in the Society's art of "proving" by the aid of quotations.

The erroneous statement
presented in 1977 that "reliable sources list only 24 major
earthquakes" from A.D. 856 to 1914 would soon become useful to the Watch
Tower Society in another, most unexpected way. The year after that claim was
published, in the Italian journal Il Piccolo, of October 8, 1978, a
writer, Geo Malagoli, presented the following views:

Our
generation lives in a dangerous period of high seismic activity, as statistics
show. In fact, during a period of 1,059 years (from 856 to 1914) reliable
sources list only 24 major earthquakes causing 1,973,000 deaths. However, if we
compare this figure to the partially complete list of recent disasters, we find
that 1,600,000 persons have died in only 63 years, as a result of 43
earthquakes which occurred from 1915 to 1978. The dramatic increase further
goes to emphasize another accepted fact - our generation is an unfortunate one
in many ways.
(Quoted from The Watchtower, May 15, 1983, page 6.)

By stating that fatality
figures indicate that ours is a "period of high seismic activity,"
Geo Malagoli reveals that he is definitely not a seismologist.41He is clearly a reader of the Awake!
magazine, however. A careful comparison will show that his statement is
practically a word-for-word repetition of the same statement published by the
Watch Tower Society one and a half years earlier. (See page 62.)

It is quite evident that
the source of Malagoli's "information" was the Awake! magazine
of February 22, 1977, quoted earlier. The slight differences are easy to
explain. He has rounded off the figures: 1,972,952 to 1,973,000, and 1,579,209
to 1,600,000. As one year had passed since the figures were originally
published in Awake!, hehas also raised the 62 years (from 1915
to 1977) to 63 years (1915-1978). But aside from this, all details are
identical. And from now on this Geo Malagoli began to appear in the Watch Tower
publications, time and again, every time the subject of earthquakes was brought
up for discussion - elevated to the position of a neutral, impartial earthquake
authority!

Malagoli's statement in Il
Piccolo was first picked up and cited under the heading of "Insight on
the News" in The Watchtower of June 15, 1979 (page 11), without the
reader being informed that Malagoli had in turn borrowed his information from
the Awake! magazine. Next year - in 1980 - Malagoli and his statement
appeared again, this time in the book Happiness - How to Find It, where
he is quoted on page 148 as the sole "evidence" presented of
the claimed increase in earthquake activity since 1914. A few months later, in
the Awake! of October 8, 1980, Malagoli is again quoted as the one and
only source of evidence:

Has the
frequency of earthquakes really Increased? The Italian magazine II Piccolo observed:
'Our generation lives in a dangerous period of high seismic activity, as
statistics show.' And then it produced figures for the past thousand years to
prove it. (Page 20, 21)

And of course they avoided
mentioning the fact that the 'figures produced' were -originally - produced by
the Watch Tower Society itself.

In 1981 Malagoli was quoted
in the Society's book " Let Your Kingdom Come"on page
113, and in 1982 "his" figures were referred to three times: in the Awake!
of April 8, page 13, in The Watchtower of April 15, page 9, and in
the new study book You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth, page 151.
Each time Malagoli's figures were the only "evidence" offered as to
increased earthquake activity. In the special discussion of earthquake activity
published in The Watchtower ofMay 15, 1983, Malagoli was finally
brought up again as the principal witness (aside from the Watch Tower Society's
own misleading statistics) to the claimed increase in the earthquake activity
since 1914. Incredible as it may seem, this time his statement was used to
"disprove" what an authentic earthquake authority, Keiiti Aki,
states, namely, that the period from 1500 through 1700 was as active as the
past 100 years!

Thus we find that the Watch
Tower Society's principal, yes, its sole seemingly "neutral" and
"impartial" proof that earthquake activity has increased since 1914
is an Italian writer, who -undoubtedly in good faith - borrowed his
"information" right out of the Awake! magazine. That
"information" on seismic activity in the past is, in turn, completely
erroneous and has nothing to do with actual historical evidence. The fact that
the Society, time and again, has presented this false information-seemingly
taken from a neutral source-in order to "prove" its interpretation of
the "sign" since 1914, should induce every honest reader of its
publications to ask if this Society is genuinely deserving of his or her
confidence in its remarkable claims.

Quotations taken out of
context and given a different, slanted meaning, biased selection of figures and
data, misuse of and even fabrication of statistics that are then presented as
though coming from an outside, neutral source-these are the methods employed by
the Watch Tower publications to support the claim that the number of
earthquakes and of quake victims has soared since 1914. How is it that persons
considered as devout and respectable men resort to such methods?

An article entitled
"Fraud in Science," published in the Awake! of May 22, 1984,
pointed out that dedicated scientists such as Ptolemy, Galileo, Mendel, Newton
and others sometimes resorted to manipulation of figures, data selection and
even fabrication of data in order to support their theories. The article
then says that, "conscientious and honorable though a scientist, or
anyone, may be in other things, when his own reputation or interest is at
stake, he can become quite dogmatic, irrational, even reckless, or take a
shortcut." (Page 6) Emphasizing that "science, too, has its
skeletons in the closet," the article concludes:

Their
occasional exposure ought to make us realize that though science and scientists
are often put on a pedestal, their place on it should be carefully reevaluated.
(Page 8)

We ask: When such
"skeletons" are also found in the "closet" of a religious
organization, should not this induce a similar reevaluation of the exalted
position which that organization claims for itself?

Earthquakes
in the light of history

What are, then, the actual
facts about earthquakes in the past? If, as seismologists clearly demonstrate, thousands
of destructive earthquakes took place during the period from 856 to 1914,
how is it possible for anyone to state that "there were only 24 major
earthquakes" during that period? One possibility is that such a listing
was found under the entry "Earthquake" in a reference work of one
kind or another. Encyclopedias and other reference works often present tables with
a brief selection of major earthquakes of the past. But in no case have we
ever found any such list that claims to be complete. On the contrary, one
is usually informed in one way or another that the list presented is
incomplete. Thus seismologists Frank Press and Raymond Siever, on page 651 of
their popular textbook Earth (San Francisco 1974) list 32 (note!)
earthquakes from 856 to 1914 under the heading " Some of the
world's worst earthquakes (in lives lost)." Clearly, only a writer grossly
ignorant of the facts could honestly claim that pre-1914 history recognizes
only 24 major earthquakes! Only such a writer would also be able to pen the
following statement on page 18 of the Awake! of May 8, 1974:

Further,
the great earthquakes of the past were generally isolated events occurring
years, even centuries, apart. There were not many of them in a single
generation.

In a remarkably similar
statement, Hal Lindsey's book The 1980's - Countdown to Armageddon (1981),
on page 29 says:

There have
been many great earthquakes throughout history, but, according to surprisingly
well-kept records, in the past they did not occur very frequently. The 20th
century, however, has experienced an unprecedented increase in the frequency of
these calamities. In fact, the number of earthquakes per decade has roughly
doubled in each of the 10-year periods since 1950.

Although lacking even the
slightest foundation in fact, such statements could be the hasty impression
obtained by someone whose main, perhaps only, information about earthquakes in
history has been brief looks at tables containing partial selections of major
earthquakes.

As has been shown, the
earthquake catalogs carefully worked out by seismologists list a vastly greater
number of major earthquakes for the period 856-1914. For this reason the Watch
Tower Society has felt it necessary to try to undermine confidence in these
catalogs. The Awake! magazine of May 8, 1974, stated:

Nor do all
historical records about 'great' earthquakes of the ~ Inspire confidence in their
reliability. That was the view of noted cataloger John Milne. 'In these
catalogues,' we read in the 1939 edition of his book Earthquakes and Other
Earth Movements (revised and rewritten by A. W. Lee), 'there are
uncertainties in the dates, or even the years, for many of the ancient
earthquakes. There are numerous inaccurate or obscure references in the
original writings.' (Page 18)

With this quotation, taken
out of context, the Watch Tower Society dismisses all the catalogs of thousands
of earthquakes in the past, carefully compiled by modern specialists. Was it
really the view of John Milne and A. W Lee that these catalogs could be
ignored, because the ancient documents often contained "inaccurate or
obscure references." and because "there are uncertainties in the
date, or even the years." for many of the quakes? Milne's statement seen
in its context gives the reader quite a different impression:

The
information available for examination of the distribution of earthquakes in
different parts of the world throughout historic times has been collected in
many catalogues. The older catalogues, which were prepared from reports found
in the histories of various countries, are necessarily incomplete, and do
not give a fair representation of the distribution of seismic phenomena
over the entire globe. In these catalogues there are uncertainties in the
dates, or even the years, for many of the ancient earthquakes. There are
numerous inaccurate or obscure references in the original writings, and the
dates are frequently given according to some little known system of reckoning.
The entries for these ancient shocks refer, for the most part, to widespread
disasters.42

Read in its entirety and in
its context, Milne's (and Lee's) estimation of the catalogs presents a quite
different meaning. What they in fact point out is that, since the older catalogs
are incomplete, the real number of ancient earthquakes was actually larger,
and that these catalogs, therefore, do not give a fair representation of
the full scope of the situation as regards earlier seismic activity. The
uncertainties regarding certain dates or years, they say, are owing to the fact
that the dates are frequently given according to some system of reckoning that
is little known today. This in no way says, then, that the ancient sources were
careless and thus unreliable in this respect, an impression created by the
Watch Tower Society by taking the statement out of its context and interrupting
the quotation in the middle of a sentence. Nor does the observation that the
descriptions of the ancient earthquakes sometimes contain "inaccurate or
obscure references" constitute a denial that these earthquakes did indeed
take place.

Turning to one of the
learned classical writers of antiquity, we obtain an interesting illustration
of this incompleteness of existing catalogs of earthquakes of the past. Shortly
before his death in A.D. 65, the famous Roman writer Seneca stated that
frequent earthquakes had long been a characteristic of the ancient world:

How often
have cities in Asia, how often in Achaia, been laid low by a single shock of
earthquake! How many towns in Syria, how many in Macedonia, have been swallowed
up! How often has this kind of devastation laid Cyprus in ruins! How often has
Paphos collapsed! Not infrequently are tidings brought to us of the utter
destruction of entire cities. (Seneca Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, translated
by Richard M. Gummere, Vol. 11, London & New York, 1920, p. 437.)

No existing earthquake
catalog would claim to embrace all the disastrous shocks presupposed by this
statement. In fact, only a very small number of earthquakes before A.D. 65 have
been specifically identified. But it would certainly be a mistake to infer from
this that earthquake catastrophes "did not occur very frequently" in
the past, as author Lindsey states and the Watch Tower's Awake! magazine
implies. Seneca's personal testimony is that as far back as the first century
they did occur with notable frequency. That few if any specifics are known today
about these destructive quakes certainly does not mean that they did not take
place.

That modern earthquake
catalogs, far from exaggerating the number of shocks in the past, actually list
only a small minority of them, has been noted by several seismologists. In
1971, for example, seismologist N. N. Ambraseys at Imperial College of Science
and Technology, London, reported that he had identified about 2,200
"larger shocks" in the Eastern Mediterranean alone between A.D. 10
and 1699. Having started a fresh and painstaking examination of contemporary
source material and recent archaeological evidence from that area of notable
seismicity, he stated:

The total
number of all earthquakes, large and small, identified so far for the period AD
10 to 1699, is just over 3,000, or about twenty times the number of genuine
earthquakes listed for the same period in modern catalogues.43

Professor Ambraseys has not
yet published a documented study of these findings, but the series of
catastrophic earthquakes that befell the Eastern Roman Empire in A.D. 447 - the
year of Attila the Hun's second invasion - are probably among the 2,200 larger
shocks mentioned above. We learn of them through historian E. A. Thompson, who
states the following in his book A History of Attila and the Huns (Oxford,
England, 1948), on page 91:

As the Hun
squadrons prepared to move, a disaster of the first magnitude befell the
Romans. The series of earthquakes which shattered the Eastern Empire for
four months beginning on 26 January 447 were, in the belief of Evagrius, the
worst in its history. Entire villages were swallowed up and countless disasters
occurred both on land and sea. Thrace, the Hellespont, and the Cyclades all
suitered. For three or four days after the earthquakes began, the rain poured
from the sky, we are told, in rivers of water. Hillocks were levelled with the
ground. Countless buildings were thrown down in Constantinople, and, worst of
all, a stretch of the massive walls of Anthemius, including no less than
fifty-seven towers, fell to the ground.

Yet these disastrous shocks
of 447 A.D. are not included in any of the earthquake catalogs the authors
of this present work have had access to.

It is only since the middle
of the last century that seismologists have intensively studied records of
earthquakes in the past. Robert Mallet, "the first true
seismologist." not only examined the older catalogs compiled by his
predecessors, but he also searched through libraries all over Europe, looking
for records of ancient earthquakes. Finally, in the Reports of the British
Association for the years 1852-54, he published a catalog of nearly seven
thousand earthquakes, dating from 1606 B.C. to A.D. 1850!44 As
Milne and Lee pointed out, these entries "refer, for the most part, to
widespread disasters," that is, great and destructive earthquakes.

But this was just a
beginning. When John Milne, "the father of seismology," arrived in
Tokyo in 1875, "it was to find records of over two thousand earthquakes in
the Japanese archives." 45 In Japan a running list of
destructive earthquakes had been kept for a period of more than two thousand
years! Soon also similar records were discovered in China. The Chinese records
go back to 1100 B. C. and "are fairly complete from around 780 BC, the
period of the Chou dynasty in north China."46

Within a short time several
seismologists started working out careful catalogs of quakes in different
countries. Thus Davison's History of British Earthquakes lists 1,191
shocks from A. D. 974 to 1924 in England alone - a country far removed from the
earthquake belts of the earth.47 In Italy, Mario Baratta, in his I
Terremoti d'Italia, published in 1901, gives accounts of 1,364 earthquakes
which have shaken Italy from A.D. I to 1898.48 Similar catalogs list
earthquakes in Austria, Russia, China, Japan and so on.49

The greatest earthquake
collector among modern seismologists, however, was a Frenchman, Count F.
Montessus de Ballore. From 1885 to 1922 he devoted all his time to studying and
cataloging earthquakes. "His greatest work, however, was never
published. This is a monumental catalogue of the earthquakes in all parts of
the world since the earliest historic times, and contains information about
171,434 earthquakes"! The manuscript is stored in the library of the
Geographical Society in Paris, where it occupies 26 metres (over 84 feet) of
bookshelves.50

John Milne, too, spent
several years in compiling his catalog of earthquakes from all over the world.
Limiting his study to destructive earthquakes only, he lists 4,151
destructive earthquakes between the years A.D. 7 to A.D. 1899.51
The entries before A.D. 1700, which "are practically confined to
occurrences in Southern Europe, China, and Japan." are, for logical
reasons, sparser.52 Milne was admirably strict in handling his
sources. He states:

Not only
have certain small earthquakes been omitted, but whenever the information on
which the accounts of larger ones have been based has been of doubtful
character, these also have been rejected.53

Milne indicated the
intensity of the earthquakes he listed according to the scale I, II and III,
with III referring to the most destructive earthquakes, "those which
destroyed towns and devastated districts," cracking walls, shattering old
buildings, and so forth "up to a distance of 100 miles" from the
center. During the last century alone (the nineteenth), when the records are
most complete, about 370 earthquakes of class III are listed. When compared
with such documented evidence the Watch Tower Society's reference to only 24
major earthquakes from 856 to 1914 A.D. becomes virtually ludicrous.

As a matter of fact, the
Watch Tower Society in effect has now recognized this. In the summer of 1985
they published a statement acknowledging that there had been 856 severe
earthquakes during the 2000 years preceding 1914. (See Reasoning from the
Scriptures, 1985, page 236.) Although this is a step in the right direction,
this figure also is a far cry from the actual truth. The arguments based on
this new figure actually are as deceptive as those based on the earlier
figures. (See the accompanying box on page 79.)

When it comes to the number
of deaths in different earthquakes in the past, the ancient records are
often silent or give very scanty information. The Awake!
issue of July 8, 1982, on page 16, claimed that, "From the time Jesus
gave his prophecy until 1914, history records five earthquakes that each took
100,000 lives or more." while "In the period since 1914 at least four
more such superearthquakes have occurred."

The Watch Tower Society's
statement about a 20-fold increase in earthquakes since 1914 was also sent to a
number of leading seismologists around the world. All of them rejected the
claim and none of them thought that our century is in any way unique with
respect to the number of great earthquakes. A number of the answers received
are reproduced in the Appendix [in printed edition] (Appendix A).

Just to demonstrate how
erroneous such a statement is, the following table presents 24 such
"superearthquakes" from the period A.D. 532 to 1914. Perhaps as many
as seven of these (there are quite naturally some uncertainties)
occurred in the eighteenth century alone.54

Location

Deaths

A.D. 532

Syria

130,000

678

Syria

170,000

856

Iran: Qumis Damghan

200,000

893

India: Daipul

180,000

893

Iran: Ardabil

150,000

1138

Egypt, Syria

230,000

1139

Iran: Gansana

100,000

1201

Upper Egypt, Syria

1,100,000

1290

China: Chihli

100,000

1556

China

830,000

1641

Iran: Dehkwargan,
Tabriz

300,000

1662

China

300,000

1669

Sicily (Etna
eruption)

100,000

1693

Sicily: Catania and
Naples

100,000

1703

Japan (tsunami)

100,000

1721

Iran: Tabriz

100,000

1730

China: Chihli

100,000

1730

Japan: Hokkaido

137,000

1731

China: Peking

100,000

1737

India: Calcutta

300,000

1780

Iran: Tabriz

100,000

1850

China

300-400,000

1876

Bay of Bengal
(tsunami)

215,000

1908

Italy:
Messina/Reggio

110,000

Comparing this information
with the statement of the Awake! writer earlier-quoted, it becomes
painfully evident how remarkably superficial the research of the Watch Tower
publications is, how utterly irresponsible the claims made actually are.

In many cases great numbers
of deaths have been caused by accompanying results or consequences of
earthquake activity, such as tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, landslides, fires,
and similar factors. But this holds equally true for some of the
"superearthquakes" occurring after 1914. The 100,000 that died
in the earthquake in China in 1920, for example, were killed primarily by a
landslide triggered by the quake. The earthquake in Japan in 1923 caused a fire
storm that killed 38,000 of the 143,000 victims. It should also be added that
the table above certainly does not claim to list all
"superearthquakes" before 1914.

In view of the population
increase it might seem only reasonable to expect that more people have died in
earthquakes during our century than during earlier centuries.55 The
following challenge on page 19 of the Awake! magazine of May 8, 1974, would
therefore seem rather safe to make:

All
together, over 900,000 persons have died in earthquakes since 1914! Can any
single 'generation' equal that terrible record? Jesus' prophecies about
earthquakes apply now.

Although this number has
subsequently increased by a few hundred thousands in the years that have passed
since that statement was published in the Awake! magazine, we will
nonetheless take up the gauntlet presented by the Watch Tower's challenge.

As the historical entries
before A.D. 1700 "are practically confined to occurrences in Southern
Europe, China and Japan" (Milne), we choose the generation from 1714
onward and compare it with the generation after 1914. The table in the Awake!
of February 22, 1977, covering the period 1915-1976, has been updated to
include the years up to 1983 inclusive. A correction of the figure for the
great earthquake in China in 1976 has been made at the bottom of the table,
with a reference to a later statement in Awake!. (See page 83.)

The results show that the
total death figure in earthquakes from 1915 to 1983 amounts to 1,210,597, which
is an annual average of 17,545.

The accompanying table (on
the left side) listing 43 major earthquakes from 1715 to 1783 shows a total of
1,373,845 deaths, which is about 163,000 more, giving an annual average of
19,911!

To prove that 1914 was a
real seismic "turning point" The Watchtower of May 15, 1983,
made reference to 50 destructive earthquakes during the 68 years between 1914
and 1982. (Page 7) We have therefore prepared a table for the 68 years preceding
1914 (1847-1914) showing a partial list of 50 destructive earthquakes
compiled from reliable sources. It demonstrates very conclusively that 1914
cannot have been the conspicuous turning point the Watch Tower Society claims
it was.

Of course, no such tables
are complete. For a number of great earthquakes from the 18th century onward,
no death figures are known, the contemporary records simply giving the
information that "many" were killed in them. Even if death figures
were to be added to all three tables by including more earthquakes from the
three periods involved, the comparison still would only demonstrate that the
generation of 1914 is in no way unique as far as earthquakes are concerned.56
(See page 84.)

We
have seen, one by one, the different claims of the Watch Tower Society
demolished by historical facts - that the period A.D. 856-1914 saw only 24
major earthquakes, that the great earthquakes of the past occurred "years,
even centuries, apart," that history records only five "superearthquakes"
from the time of Christ to 1914, and that no single generation before 1914 can
equal the one following that year with respect to earthquake victims. Is it
really possible that the writers of the Watch Tower publications are so
ignorant of past earthquakes- or are they trying to conceal the truth about
them from their readers? We prefer to believe that they primarily have
been ignorant of the facts. But if so, it is extremely remarkable that an
organization claiming to have been authorized by Jesus Christ to interpret the
signs of the time for people of our days, seems to take so little interest in
verifying how its interpretations and statistics tally with historical reality.

Finally, what do the
seismologists themselves say as to the overall picture? Have they found any
marked difference between the frequency of earthquakes since 1914 compared with
earlier centuries? Seismologists J. Milne and A. W Lee declared that "there
is no indication that seismic activity has increased or diminished appreciably
throughout historic times."57And professor Markus
Båth agrees: "For earlier centuries we do not have the same reliable
statistics, but there are no indications at all of any increase in the activity
in the course of time."58

As the ancient records
become more and more sparse and incomplete the farther back in time we go, it
is only natural that we have more and better information from the latest
centuries than from the earlier ones. There is, however, one exception: Japan.
As was shown earlier, the Japanese have kept a running record of destructive
earthquakes in that country (with its frequent seismic activity) reaching back
to well before the birth of Christ. According to Milne's catalog the number of destructive earthquakes in Japan recorded during each century from the
ninth to the nineteenth are:

Century

No
of destructive earthquakes in Japan

9th

40

10th

17

11th

20

12th

18

13th

16

14th

19

15th

36

16th

17

17th

26

18th

31

19th

27

WHAT LEADING
SEISMOLOGISTS SAY

WHAT LEADING SEISMOLOGISTS SAY
ABOUT EARTHQUAKES TODAY AND IN THE PAST

"Certain religious
groups have picked this rather unfortunate time to insist that the number of
earthquakes is increasing. In part they are misled by the increasing number
of small earthquakes that are being catalogued and listed by newer, more
sensitive stations throughout the world. It is worth remarking that the
number of great earthquakes from 1896 to 1906 was greater than in any
ten-year interval since." - Professor Charles Richter in National
History, December 1969, p. 44.

"For earlier
centuries we do not have the same reliable statistics, but there are no
indications at all of any increase in the activity in the course of
time." - Professor Markus Båth, private letter dated June 17, 1983.

"I certainly
would agree with both Professors Båth and Richter in their assessment that
there has been no significant increase in the number of earthquakes during
this or any other century." - Wilbur A. Rinehart, seismologist at the
World Data Center A, Boulder, Colorado. Private letter dated August 8, 1985. Page 1 and page 2.

An expert on the
seismicity of the Mediterranean area, one of the earth's major earthquake
regions, says:

"Most certainly,
there has been no increase in the seismic activity of the Mediterranean
during this century. Quite the contrary, in the Eastern Mediterranean the
activity of this century has been abnormally low when compared with that of
the 10th-12th and 18th centuries." - Professor N. N. Ambraseys, private letter dated August 9,
1985.

"I feel strongly
that the seismicity has been stationary for thousands of years. . . .
Excellent geological evidence for the stationarity has been obtained by Prof.
Kerry Sieh of Caltech, for the San Andreas fault." - Seismologist Keiiti
Aki, professor at the Department of Geological Sciences, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles. Private
letter dated September 5, 1985.

"There are
indications that worldwide seismic activity - if expressed in terms of
earthquakes with magnitude 7 or over-has decreased steadily in the time from
the beginning of the 20th century until now." - Seweryn J. Duda,
Professor of Geophysics, University of Hamburg. Private letter dated July 7, 1986.

(The private letters
quoted above are reproduced in their entirety in the Appendix [in printed
edition].)

In our own century about 20
earthquakes of some importance had occurred in Japan up to 1983, pointing to a
final total of perhaps 2530 for the whole present century.59
Evaluating these figures, Milne and Lee reported that "the data support
the conclusion that during historic times the amount of seismic activity has
not changed to any appreciable extent."60

Consequently, there is no
evidence whatsoever in support of the claim made by various religious sources,
including the Worldwide Church of God, a Seventh Day Adventist author, and
notably by the Watch Tower Society, that earthquake activity is markedly different
in our century compared with earlier centuries. All information available
points to the contrary. The shifting, twisting, uncoordinated claims of the
Watch Tower Society and their juggling of facts and figures in an effort to
prove that an increase has occurred have been revealed above as fraudulent
-hopefully not deliberately so, but as a result of remarkably poor research,
superfical analysis and wishful thinking.

Footnotes

1 Peter Vemey, The
Earthquake Handbook, New York and London 1979, p. 47. There is no general
consensus about this. Professor N. N. Ambraseys, for instance, considers John
Michell (1724-93) 'the first true seismologist.' (Ambraseys, Engineering
Seismology, University of London, Inaugural lecture 18 Nov. 1975, p. 54.)

2 Vemey, p. 5 1.
Others would term him the 'father of English seismology' only,
recognizing that other, contemporary scientists in other countries, too, made
important contributions to the early development of seismology. (See the
discussion by Dr. August Sieberg in Geologische, physikalische un angewandte
Erdbebenkunde, Jena 1923, pp. 2, 373.)

12 Vemey, p. 96. The
earthquake in San Francisco in 1906, that killed about 700 people, also had a
magnitude of 8.3. (The three earthquakes in New Madrid, Missouri, in 1911-12
were greater than these two, with estimated magnitudes of 8.6, 8.5 and 8.7,
respectively.)

13 Verney, p. 72. The
Encyclopedia Americana, 1966 ed., under "Earthquake;' page 496, states
that, "If all shocks down to the very smallest are included, it is likely
that the total may be well over a million' " The great majority of these
shocks am, of course, not noticed by man, being recorded only with the aid of
instruments.

14 Natural History, Dec. 1969, p. 44. In his Elementary
Seismology (San Francisco 1958, page 357) Richter similarly states that
"There is no escape from the conclusion that the greatest shallow [that
is, near the surface] shocks were more frequent before 1918 than
afterward."

15 S. J. Duda,
"Secular seismic energy release in the circum-Pacific belt," Tectonophysics,
2 (1965), pp. 409-52; Markus Båith and S. J. Duda, "Some aspects of
global seismicity." Tectonophysics, 54 (1979), pp. TI-T8.
Newspapers often present grossly misleading data on earthquakes. Richter (1958.
p. 5) points out that "the popular press" can be used "only with
caution." However, The Watchtower of May 15, 1984, p. 25, referred
to an article published in The New York Times that termed 1983 "A
Year of Earthquakes," because of a claimed "rash of lethal
earthquakes" that year. To prove this The Watchtower reproduced a
list of 9 quakes from a period of 3 months, all of which were said to be
"major earthquakes, reckoned on the Richter scale." A closer look at
the list, however, shows that only 3 of the 9 earthquakes are
"major," having a magnitude of 7.0 or more. As Professor Markus Båth
points out (personal letter, dated October 3, 1984), this is not above, but
below the normal.. "The information from The New York Times is
completely misleading. With 3 earthquakes of a magnitude of 7 or more during 3
months, the number of such quakes would be 12 in a year. This is clearly below
the average, which is 20 quakes a year with a magnitude of 7 or more. The
statement in the newspaper points to a quake activity that is below the
normal!" Nor was 1983 "A Year of Earthquakes" measured by death
figures. According to information available from the World Data Center A
for Solid Earth Geophysics (see later, footnote 19),
only 2,328 persons died in earthquakes during 1983, which is far below the average.

20 Ganse & Nelson, pp.
56, 59. The earthquake in Afghanistan in 1956 claimed 220 lives according to
some tables, 2,000 according to others.

21 The estimates of this
kind that do exist seem to have been generally included in the catalog prepared
by Ganse and Nelson. (See earlier footnote 19.)

22 In this connection it is
noteworthy that The Watchtower, February 1, 1974, p. 72, states that
"some of the earthquakes with the highest magnitude ratings - are under
the oceans" and that such "have had virtually no effect on men."
Speaking of "potentially damaging earthquakes" (3.8 and over),
seismologist J. H. Latter, in the Advancement of Science (June 1969, page
365) even says that "the overwhelming majority occur beneath the sea or
far from inhabited regions." As such quakes in most cases would pass
unnoticed before the time of instrumental registration, it is clear that the
Society's magnitude criterion could grossly distort the real facts about
earthquake frequency.

23 Although Ganse and
Nelson have tried to estimate such damages for past earthquakes in their
catalog, the damages for numerous earthquakes are stated to be
"unknown."

25 Awake! Oct. 22,
1984, p. 6. Note the wording "reported earthquakes." It indicates
that the Society knows that written records of great quakes in the past are
incomplete. However, the unsuspecting reader is not likely to notice this
distinction. The Society obviously wants him to conclude that there actually
has been a tremendous increase of earthquakes since 1914. Thus the
Society's book Survival into a New Earth (1984) does not hesitate to
state that the frequency of major earthquakes "has increased about 20
times what it was on an average during the two thousand years before
1914." (p. 23)

26 The Watchtower, May 15,
1983, p. 5. In Awake!, August 8, 1968 p. 30, the Society emphasized that
an earthquake in the latter part of June that year "claiming the lives of
16 persons and injuring 100 others" fulfilled "Scripture
prophecies," although no magnitude rating or property value was
considered. We agree that this earthquake met Jesus' prophecy, even if the
Society should now reject it in the light of their latest criteria. There have
been innumerable such earthquakes since Jesus spoke his words about them.

27 This quake is usually
said to have claimed more lives than any other recorded earthquake in history.
However, it may have been surpassed in this respect by the earthquake that hit
Upper Egypt and/or Syria on July 5, 1201, which, according to some ancient
records, cost about 1,100,000 lives. If this figure were divided by a period of
62 years, we would obtain an annual average of 17,740. This would be a higher
figure than the correct figure for the 20th century, 15,700, as shown in this
section. See S. Alsinawi and H. A. A. Ghalith, "Historical Seismicity of
Iraq;" Proceedings of the First Arab Seismological Seminar, Seismological
Unit of Scientific Research, Baghdad, Iraq, December 1978; also Ganse and
Nelson, p. 6.

28 The author of the
Society's textbook You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth (1982),
clearly presents these 24 quakes as a complete list of major quakes
by saying that "From the year 856 C.E. to 1914, there were only 24
major earthquakes." (P. 151)

29 Happiness How to Find
It, 1980, p. 149; the same impressive statistics were again published in The
Watchtower of May 15, 1983, p. 7 (chart III).

30 Vemey, p. 7.
Seismologist J. H. Latter estimates that "a minimum of five million people
have died as a result of earthquakes, and half a million as a result of
volcanic eruptions, since A.D. 1000." But he adds: " It is
probable that the maximum figures are between two and three times higher than
this," that is, 10-15 million since A.D. 1000. This would mean a
maximum of 1.5 million per century on the average. (Advancement ofScience,
June 1969, p. 362)

32 Bath, p. 137. The Time
magazine of September 1, 1975, similarly stated: "During recorded
history, earthquakes - and the floods, fires and landslides they have triggered
- are estimated to have taken as many as 74 million lives."

33 Encyclopedia
Americana, 1966, "Earthquake;" page 498. Bath (page 14 1) has the
same figure, 100,000, in his list. The earthquake in Japan 1923, which
according to the Society's list took 143,000 lives, killed 95,000 according to
the Encyclopedia Americana. Butas shown by C. F. Richter (Elementary
Seismology, page 562), who gives the death figure as 99,331, an additional
number of 43,476 were reported as missing. The total death toll, then, was
probably about 143,000. In one case the Encyclopedia Americana has a
considerably higher figure than The Watchtower. This is the 1939
earthquake in Turkey, which the encyclopedia claims to have taken about 100,000
lives, while The Watchtower, like Bith, Ganse & Nelson, and other
seismologists, sets the death figure at 30,000.

34 A report
from Hong Kong first erroneously set the death figure at 655,237, from which
the Western estimates of 650,000-800,000 were derived. When finally, the
Chinese authorities, who at first kept all information about the catastrophe
secret, released information about the earthquake, they put the death total at
242,000. ("Chinese Seismological Society Report on July 28, 1976
Event," Dalian Meeting 1979 Xinhua News Agency. Compare Ganse &
Nelson, p. 70, 148, ref. 61.) The Dallas Times Herald of Sept. 3. 1983,
summarized the new information as follows: "Officials now put the Tangshan
death toll at 148,000 with another 81,000 seriously injured. In a deadly
triangle anchored by Tangshan, Peking and Tianjin, nearly 100,000 other people
died, increasing the official death total to 242,000. Western estimates placed
the death toll as high as 800,000."

35 Professor Båth, in a
personal letter dated October 3, 1994, explains: "recent example [of
exaggerations] is the China earthquake 27/7, 1976 (page 149 in my
'introduction'), for which Hong Kong (!) gave a much too high a figure
immediately after the quake. Long afterwards (too late, in fact, to be included
in my book) an official Chinese report gave the number of victims as 242,000,
which now is regarded as the correct figure."

36 Professor Båth, in his
letter of October 3. 1984, points out that the annual deaths in earthquakes
during the twentieth century are 15,700 on the average (as against the
Society's 25,300).

37 Verney, page 7. The Awake!
of April 8, 1981, also quoted Robert I. Tilling, chief of the U. S.
Geological Survey's office of Geochemistry and Geophysics, as saying that there
are "some suggestions that both volcanoes and earthquakes worldwide are on
the increase." Professor Markus Båth, however, who is a leading authority
on earthquake activity, comments that "Tilling's statement is wrong. No
increase in the seismic activity of the earth has occurred." (Personal
letter of October 3, 1984)

38 Scientific American, September
1950, p. 48. The quotation may be found, for example, in Awake!, March
8, 1956, pp. 7,8; Awake!, December 22, 1960, pp. 14,15; The
Watchtower, 196 1, p. 628; Awake!, October 8, 1965, p. 16; and in Aid,
197 1, p. 478. In each case, the quotation was the sole evidence of an
increase in the earthquake activity since 1914!

39 It should also be
observed that the "new phase" had appeared for at most parts of three
years, from 1948 to 1950, when the information was published. The information
could not show, of course, whether the "new phase" would continue after
1950. Certainly this would be a slender thread of evidence upon which to
build such startling claims.

40 There is evidence that
it was realized that the Scientific American article of 1950 had begun
to take on a somewhat outdated look, one in need of renewal. The Watch Tower
Society's Bible dictionary Aid to Bible Understanding, published in
1971, thus made use of this quote in an unusual way, one that gave a further
false appearance, as is shown in the following quotation: "Jesus foretold
earthquakes in great number and magnitude as a feature of the sign of his
second presence. (Matt. 24:3, 7, 8; Mark 13:4, 8) Since 1914 C.E., and especially
since 1948, there has been an increase in the number of earthquakes, especially
major ones. Before 1948, they occurred in clusters, with a rest period
inbetween, but since then there has been a major quake almost annually, in
addition to a great number of smaller ones See Encyclopedia Americana, Annuals,
1965-1967, under 'Earthquakes.'" ( Aid to Bible Understanding, p.
178.) The sentences from the Scientific American are almost literally
repeated in this dictionary, but instead of referring to that magazine (by then
some twenty years old) as the source, The Encyclopedia Americana, Annuals
of 1965-1967, is referred to, evidently in order to give this "proof"
a more current look and to indicate that the 1948-50 phase still persisted. The
problem is, however, that this encyclopedia has nothing whatever to say about
such a "new phase" from 1948, or of any increase in earthquake
activity in our century! The unsuspicious and loyal reader of the Watch Tower
publications takes it for granted that the new source cited confirms the
statement about such an increase. It is most unlikely that he will check the
source to find out that he has been misled. This way of substantiating claims
is far from honest, especially as the statements are presented as the sole
proof of the claimed post-1914 increase in earthquakes.

41 High seismic activity is
not necessarily translated into high death figures. As Båth (quoted above, see
footnote 11) points out, "There is usually no clear correlation between
the magnitude of a shock and the number of killed people or other
destruction." Only if the seismic activity is manifested in densely
populated areas can there be high death figures. Seismologists, therefore,
measure seismic activity by instruments, not by fatality reports.

54 Robert A. Ganse and John
B. Nelson, Catalog of Significant Earthquakes 2000 B.C. 1979, Boulder,
Colorado, 1981, pp. 3-33. (Report SE-27 of the World Data Center A for Solid
Earth Geophysics.) On the Messina/Reggio quake, see A. Imamura, Theoretical
and Applied Seismology, Tokyo 1937, pp. 140, 202, 204, which says that some
83,000 died in Messina and c. 20,000 in Reggio. Other sources used are: N. N.
Ambraseys in Revue pour 1`étude des calamitès, No. 37, Geneve, December
1961, p. 18f, J. H. Latter, "Natural Disasters," Advancement of
Science, June 1969, pp. 363, 370; N. N. Ambraseys & C. P. Melville, A
History of Persian Earthquakes, Cambridge 1982; R. A. Daly, Our Mobile Earth,
New York & London 1926; A. T. Wilson, "Earthquakes in Persia," Bulletinof the School of Oriental Studies, London Institution, Vol. VI
(1930-32); Dr. A. Sleberg in Handbuch der Geophysik (ed. Prof. B.
Gutenberg), Vol. IV, Leipzig 1932; and James Comell, The Great International
Disaster Book, New York 1979. Death figures vary, and in several cases some
sources give considerably higher figures than shown in our table. Thus the New
Catalog of Strong Earthquakes in the U.S.S.R. from Ancient Times through 1977
(Report SE-31 of the World Data Center A, July 1982) gives 200,000~300,000
deaths for the earthquake in Gansana, Iran, in 1139. Comell (page 153) sets the
death figure for the 1693 quake in Sicily at 153,000,.and Sieberg (in
Gutenherg, p. 854) has 150,000 for the Japanese earthquake in 1703. For the two
earthquakes that hit Tabriz in Iran in 1721 and 1780, estimates range up to
250,000 and 205,000 respectively. (Ambraseys/Melville, pp. 54, 184, 186) Two
other relatively recent quakes that may have been 1.superearthquakes" are
the earthquake in Japan in 1855, which may have claimed 106,000 lives (Sieberg
in Gutenberg, p. 854), and the earthquake in Kangra, India, in 1905, of which
Comell (p. 139) says that "some other reports claim nearly 370,000 people
were killed in Central India when several villages were completely
destroyed." Neither of these has been included in the table.

55 Professor Båth points
out that "the coastal areas are most often visited by quakes, and that
these areas always have been those most densely populated." Thus,
"one cannot reckon with the total population on earth as a clue for
earlier times" when estimating the total number of earthquake victims in the
past. (Personal letter of October 3, 1984.)

56 Sources used for the
table on the 18th century earthquakes include: the catalog by Ganse &
Nelson; Milne (1911), pp. 686-698; Robert Giffen in the Journal of the
Statistical Society. Vol. XLI, London 1878, pp. 442-444; Charles Davison, Great
Earthquakes, London 1936; Akitune Imamura, Theoretical and Applied
Seismology. Tokyo 1937; Richter (1958); Båth (1979), page 139; Booth &
Fitch, p. 78; and Encyclopedia Americana Annals, 1965-67, page 498. If
the fact that the population on earth today is six-fold as great as that of the
18th century (c. 750 million in 1770), and the number of earthquake victims is
seen as a ratio of the total population, the 18th century far surpasses the
20th!