- Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think.
- Let's get a better %decription than "Something about generic functions in Python."
- Is zip-safe necessary?
E: python-ruledispatch zero-length
/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2115-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe

> - Release should have gone to 0.svnr2115.1, I think.
According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages)
(someone please fix this parenthesis) it should be :
0.1.svnr2115
If you want to bump the release without changing the version it will become
0.2.svnr2115
> - Is zip-safe necessary?
It looks like a dummy file to avoid the zip extractor bug were empty dirs are
not created. Harmless to remove, but harmless to keep also.
I would not consider it a blocker (sometimes one just has to ignore rpmlint's
warnings)

I have no problem maintaining this until Ignacio returns.
Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, FC{4,5} branches requested, tagged and
built for fc6.
Thanks!
(please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE; I don't have the privs)

Note

You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.