About Me

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Bare truths

Why is it okay for Lena Dunham to
go topless; but Miley Cyrus is a slut for showing her breasts?

Do you understand the new feminist take
on female nudity? No, me neither. Let’s start with breasts. It seems that the
world is divided into Good Breasts and Bad Breasts, depending on who is
revealing them, and why. So, when Lena Dunham, the star of Girls, drops her top
at the slightest pretext to show off her bosom, it is supposed to be A Good
Thing. But when Miley Cyrus takes off her top to writhe around a Wrecking Ball
in a video by the same name, that is A Very Bad Thing indeed.

Now, how exactly does this work?

The sub-text, insofar as I can glean it,
is this. If a woman who is judged unattractive by the cookie-cutter standards
of the glamour industry, bares her breasts, then she is striking a blow against
the standards of the beauty business. She is showing that she does not subscribe
to the normal perceptions of beauty or sex appeal. That she has the
self-confidence to show off her own body, even though it doesn’t meet the
standards set out by the Sex-Appeal Police. And in doing so, she is giving hope
and courage to other less-than-perfectly-proportioned women like herself. So,
that’s Lena Dunham sorted then.

But Miley Cyrus? No, no, no. A young and
pretty girl like her has no business stripping off for a music video. If she
does so, she is just falling into the trap set by the music industry and
commodifying herself for commercial purposes (and we have everyone from Sinead
O’Conner to Annie Lennox lining up to tell her that). This kind of behaviour
makes her no better than a stripper or even a prostitute. So, if she wants to
retain the respect of the world, she really needs to put them away – and sharpish.

Not that it’s just about Pretty Breasts
vs Ugly Breasts and the mile-long cleavage between them. It’s also about what I
like to call Fashion Breasts, which are perfectly fine viewing in expensive
glossy magazines, and Porno Breasts, that are meant to titillate men who flip
over anxiously to Page three. Again, Fashion Breasts are good: they are an
aesthetic appreciation of the female form. But Porno Breasts are bad: they
demean women everywhere (hence the feminist protest against the Page Three girls
of The Sun).

Well, I am sorry if I am being dense, but
this makes absolutely no sense to me. Are we really going to judge female
nudity on the basis of what feelings it brings forth in others? Is male
arousal, or the lack of it, going to be the benchmark by which we decide which
woman is allowed to go topless and which one isn’t? Are feminist values now
going to be decided on the basis of the Male Gaze?

And then, there is that little thing
called the ‘Slut Walk’ that rears its politically-correct head every now and
then. I am sure you have heard of it. Maybe you’ve even participated in a few.
And no doubt, you have your own ideas about it. Well, I have been grappling
with the concept, so allow me to share with you what I have gathered so far.

Mini-skirts, bikini tops, spaghetti
straps, bum cleavage, breast cleavage is all good so long as it is being
revealed by women who are participating in something called a ‘Slut Walk’. This
is – stay with me here – good because women are demonstrating that they are
entitled to dress any way they like without being judged for it. They are, they
argue, reclaiming the word ‘slut’ for themselves. And in the process, they are
shaming the men who tell them that they get objectified, harassed or raped
because of what they are wearing.

So far, so good. I can get on board with
the broad sentiment though ten hours of sustained water-boarding couldn’t get
me to ‘reclaim’ that nasty word (slut) for myself. But hey, ladies, if that’s
what rings your bell, knock yourselves out.

But once you’ve gone on the mandatory
Slut Walk, and stood up for your right to wear sexy clothes, stop complaining
when scantily-clad women are used as sexual bait to sell everything from
ice-cream to motorbikes. If you can dress that way to make a point, these women
can dress like that to make a living. (And no, nobody is pointing a gun at
their heads; they are doing so of their own free will.)

We cannot live in a world where it is
okay for women to bare their breasts so long as they remember to do it in a
politically-correct and feminist-approved manner. If a woman can revel in her
sexuality on a Slut Walk, she can do so on the floor of an ad film as well. You
can’t celebrate the one and pour opprobrium on the other.

If we are going to make any sense of
feminism, we need to be clear on our principles. If we believe that every woman
has the right to walk down half-naked on the street – as they do on their Slut
Walks – without the fear of being molested or harassed, then we cannot take
away the right of other women to bare these breasts on Page 3 if they choose to
do so of their own free will. If we applaud Lena Denham for baring her breasts
on her TV series, then we can’t shame Miley for doing the same in her music
videos. The principle can’t change on the basis of whom it applies to; or it
isn’t much of a principle at all.