Friday, 8 July 2016

Big Bang Theory Versus Little Bloop Theory: The Dogma of Physics

Big Bang Theory Versus Little Bloop Theory:

The Dogma of Physics

by Anthony
Tyler

Today, more
and more people are questioning the holes in modern-day physics–as they rightly should. Those who are still
not doing so, can be said to have not correlated all the data comprehensively
or completely, because there are, in fact, many discrepancies in the mainstream
scholastic viewpoints of “physics.” Nikola Tesla has been gaining
in popularity, seemingly with the rise of internet research. While Tesla’s
research is truly a necessary genius that needs to be further understood, this
is an unfortunate example of this uncorrelated data.

To the
general public who understands Tesla as the unsung revolutionary in modern
physics, there are too few who actually know what his scientific material, and
theories represented–because if they did, there would be a great deal more
collegiate discussion of the outright dogmatic approach to physics today.
However, to be fair, there are a vast number of accredited researchers who have
actually looked into Tesla’s (and other physicists) research, detailed it for
modern audiences, and have even taken it a step further and advanced many of
his technologies and applied theories.

Physics,
like all of what could be considered as “mainstream science” (categorized by institutionalized funding of questionable merit,
and equally questionable hypotheses) is
constrained by a sense of dogma. This dogma creates a multifaceted, and
entirely different conversation, but suffice it to say that it is one of a
limited materialist mentality–to put it into simplified terms. Interesting
avenues of research into the radically shifting paradigm of physics today, is
Michael Talbot and other researchers who elaborate on the “Holographic
Universe” model, as well as theoretical physicist, Peter J. Carroll, and even
more-known physicist, Jaques Vallee, just to name a few.

In
terms of understanding physics objectively, and separate from the materialist
dogma that it largely represents today, a primary barrier would be the
understanding of the prerequisite foundations of the universe, which many have
considered “the big bang theory” as the answer to. However, while it would be
incorrect to make a whole-sale statement and say that all the science behind
this theory is false, an understanding outside of the dogma of physics quickly
reveals a variety of holes in the theory.

Essentially,
it represents an incomplete model, much like Einstein’s theories relating to
relativity, and a much deeper contextual analysis of the theories and the
science behind them is needed, so as to assemble the larger coherent picture.
String theory today remains an ideology in this category, not representing
entire fallacy, but representing an incomplete and ultimately incomprehensive
perspective of the data it is seeking to research. This incomprehension is not
exactly due to a secret group of mad scientists, twisting the data as they see
fit, but rather represents the idea that some of the axiomatic postulations
taken for granted in modern physics may be, and some in fact are, incorrect.

Taking
the big bang theory as an example for a thought experiment on the dogma of
physics, independent researcher Clif High, of HalfPastHuman.com,
has introduced what he calls the “little bloop theory,” as an answer to
some of the misconceptions of the big bang theory. Clif High did not get a
degree in physics, so take his theory for what you will, but he is a
comprehensive linguist, computer programmer, and researcher, so his background
is established, and the level of data involved in his theory is well worth a
look, even if for nothing more than to disprove it.

High’s
lecture on the theory can be seen below:

For
brevity, this article will leave out the detailed science involved here, and
instead put forth a coherent explanation of the theory, so as to whet the
appetite of the individual researcher. While High does not actually use the
term once in his lecture, the researcher’s little bloop theory is such an
interesting proposition because, in essence, it is chaos theory applied as a
postulation for the causal mechanism of the universe. For those unfamiliar with
chaos theory, an article written on the subject can be found here, and while the theory largely
flat-lined in popularity after the ’90’s, it remains a bit of a mystery as to
why, exactly.

Chaos
theory, as it stands, perhaps represents one of the most accurate
methodological studies of the cause-and-effect chain energetic reaction that
comprises the physical universe; ranging from application in chemistry,
psychology, sociology, economics, population densities and various statistical
analyses, computer and radio transmission technologies, and thermodynamics,
just to name some. The theory can be most easily understood by considering a
glass of water spilling onto the floor. How do the drops form in the seemingly
random, unpredictable, “chaotic” way that it does?

The
answer, is simply that nothing is random, and that if traced far back enough,
the seemingly “unpredictable” characteristics of the subject at hand can be
traced back to the subject’s initial exposure conditions to the environment. In
short, water figures out how to spill by engaging in a feedback loop with its
environment, until the engagement (the spill) has been completed.

In
terms of the little bloop theory, consider the beginning of the universe
as the initial spill from the glass of water. On a mathematical level, the
first water molecule that could technically be measured outside of the glass’
rim could be considered the beginning. This beginning is infinitesimal,
seemingly insignificant, but again, on a mathematical, statistical level, this
would be considered the beginning of a chain reaction–and this is not
insignificant on an analytical level, by any means. From here, the initial
conditions that put this first water molecule into motion, will engage in this
feedback loop in the way described above, and in terms of the origin of the
universe, this was a low-pulse frequency. Through the feedback loop represented
by chaos theory, the frequency, aggregated its initial conditions, which
compounded its growth trajectories.

This
feedback loop is currently still pulsing throughout every aspect of the known
universe, and is the assimilation of reality. Taking basic ideas from the big
bang theory, the little bloop theory represents a unique, and possibly
more comprehensive explanation as to why the universe does indeed expand, by taking
a more multi-faceted and observation-based approach.

A
final interesting point, is that, if true, this theory would provide a massive
link (if not the essential link) between ancient metaphysics and modern physics. As
the parallels are becoming more recognized, the materialist dogma of physics
denies any accurate assimilation of the corresponding ancient gnosis with modern gnosis. The
little bloop, which pulses in a feedback loop continuously, is exactly what the
Taoists of China would consider the Tao, which could be considered the all-pervasive
metaphysical life-essence in all things–separate from the Self, and more like
the winds that the Self rides.

The
Tao, known by many different names, is a recurring theme that is synonymous
with many different occult philosophies, and can be considered
in part as represented in the observer effect of quantum physics. This little
bloop could also very well be interpreted as the ether in occult metaphysics, which was
scientifically elaborated on in great detail by Nikola Tesla.

Overall,
it is important to walk away with an open mind to the possibilities as they are
empirically represented, because this is the only way that the discrepancies in
modern science as represented by materialist dogma will ever be resolved.
Ironically, it was Einstein who coined the famous quote,

“Problems cannot be solved with the same mindset that
created them.”

Those
who have taken the over-generalizations of metaphysics made by Einstein and his
ilk to heart, would do well to take this piece of advice to heart as well.
While people like Clif High, Peter Carroll, and Paul LaViolette, may not have
all the answers, they are searching for them, and this is the only coherent
first step that ultimately can be made.

We provide
a live link to your original material on your site (and links via social
networking services) - which raises your ranking on search engines and helps
spread your info further!

This site
is published under Creative Commons (Attribution) CopyRIGHT (unless an
individual article or other item is declared otherwise by the copyright
holder). Reproduction for non-profit use is permitted & encouraged - if you
give attribution to the work & author and include all links in the original
(along with this or a similar notice).

Feel free
to make non-commercial hard (printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you
never know how long something will stay glued to the web – but remember
attribution!

If you
like what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large)
or leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Live long
and prosper! Together we can create the best of all possible worlds…

Follow New Illuminati on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE to the NEW ILLUMINATI YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Contact Us

Welcome to the new Enlightenment, an era when suppressed science, hidden history and the enlightening nature of reality are all revealed to those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

These are the thoughts and ideas of New Illuminati - bold forerunners and pioneers of new awareness all over the globe.

Notes on new emerging paradigms from the NEXUS New Times Magazine Founder R. Ayana, who lives in a remote Australian rainforest (and is no longer involved with the magazine) - Catching drops from the deluge in a paper cup since 1984.

§ 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright – reproduction for non-profit use is OK. Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.

Claimer

All opinions, facts, debates and conjectures xpressed herein are xtrusions of macrocosmic consciousness into your field of awareness. The New Illuminati are not to be held responsible or accountable for flashes of insight, epiphany, curiosity, transformation or enlightenment experienced by any person, human or otherwise.