Monday, January 30, 2017

I grew up in South Carolina. Never heard the word apartheid
but I lived in an apartheid system. We simply
referred to it as “our way of life.” We defined
it as “separate, but equal.” In reality, we were far more committed to keeping
things separate than equal. I went to the better school while the black
citizens in my community went to that ol’ fire trap on the south side of town. No
matter what we called it, it was an evil system and it took years of external
pressure (from the federal government,) and a lot of education to grow out of
it. Thank God, the people of conscience rejected apartheid and our “right to
exist as a white state.”

Now, look at South Africa. Apartheid, which means
“apart-ness” was sustained by all kinds of legal and emotional
justifications. Keeping blacks in Bantustans
was “good for everybody.” They were
inferior human beings that just could not take care of themselves and as long
as they provided a supply of cheap labor for the Afrikaners, apartheid worked
until the world woke up to the pain inflicted upon millions of weak human
beings and its conscience took over. The United Nations regards apartheid as a
crime against humanity. Apartheid is now rejected by every civilized nation with
the exception of Israel.

Today, Israel is an apartheid state. Of course, Israel
rejects the title and prefers to call itself a “democracy” but changing the
vocabulary does not change the fact of Israel’s brutal dominance of the
occupied territories. Oren Ben-Dor explains:

Israel never officially annexed those areas to Israel (i.e., to ‘pre-1967
Israel’); on the other hand, instead of calling them ‘occupied, it insist on defining them as ‘held’ territories. Israel created this legalistic subterfuge to
enable it to claim that articles 47 to 78 of the Geneva Convention that pertain
to ‘territories occupied in war’ are not relevant there and to ensure that the
state can be selective in the way it applies official Israeli law.[1]

It is amazing that so many people who openly opposed the
apartheid system in South Carolina and South Africa are willing to give a pass
to Israel.

It’s even called a separation (apartheid) wall. Add to that,
hundreds of checkpoints, illegal settlements, home demolitions, curfews, bombardment of unarmed
Gazans, thousands of political prisoners and you have the face of Apartheid Israel.

Saturday, January 14, 2017

Both to the “editor” of the Atlanta Journal/Constitution.
One by me and the other by James David. They did NOT publish mine. I was
disappointed, but not surprised. I titled it:

HOW DARE HE?

John Kerry is being called a
backstabber and betrayer because he failed to “protect Israel” against a UN
vote declaring settlements illegal. He
did not veto the vote of Britain, France Russia and Egypt who voted with the 14
to 0 in favor of condemning Israel’s five decade long policy of settlements.
Israel now subsidizes housing to more than 600,000 “squatters” in the West Bank
and East Jerusalem.

Where in the world did Kerry get
the idea that settlements were illegal? Well,
he probably read Article 49 (6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention, to which even
Israel is a signatory:

The Occupying Power shall not deport
or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it
occupies.

Building settlements in occupied
territories is illegal under international law, period.

However, the Journal/Constitution DID publish a letter by
my friend James David, a military General with a heart for justice. He titled
it: OBAMA RIGHT NOT TO SUPPORT ISRAEL.

President Obama’s decision to
abstain and let the latest U.N. Resolution condemning Israeli settlements pass
is an early Christmas present. Many of his critics are calling it bad for
peace. (“U.S. abstains as U.N. vote blasts Israel,” News, Dec. 24.)

So, I guess Israel’s
confiscation of Palestinian land, demolishing thousands of Palestinian homes,
uprooting their olive orchards, spraying their homes with sewage, the building
of an apartheid wall, the construction of thousands of illegal Jewish
settlements, and the daily harassment, collective punishment, unnecessary
killings of dozens of Palestinian men, women, and children, and the daily human
rights abuses on the Palestinian people is good for peace?

The only criticism
that I have on President Obama’s decision to abstain is that I wish he would’ve
voted in favor just as all 14 other nations in the UN voted. This unanimous
vote should awaken the world.

Both as a military professional and as a private citizen,
James David has knowledge of Israel’s abuse of the Palestinians which is seldom
reported in the media or expressed by our politicians. His commitment in
speaking truth to power is in itself powerful. People of conscience all around the
world are grateful for his leadership. I am one of them.

Thomas L. Are

I preached for forty three years in the Presbyterian Church before retiring. If anyone would ever refer to me as a Liberation Theologian, I would be pleased. I started blogging several years ago to express my political and religious concern for justice, especially justice for the Palestinians.