Russia gloats as America weakens

The Russian press is gloating over the decline of U.S. naval power and growing strength of Russian naval forces in the Pacific.

In an article on the Russian news site RIA Novosti, an official organ of the Russian government, Pacific Fleet Admiral Gary Harris is quoted as expressing "worry" regarding the "rapid pace" of modernization of Russian naval bases and the construction of nuclear submarines.

RIA Novosti based its article on an article on the Foreign Policy website which reported recent remarks of Admiral Harris to the House Armed Services Committee

While Foreign Policy related Admiral Harris’ concerns about both Russian and Chinese naval expansion, including the attempted annexation of most of the South China Sea, RIA Novosti emphasized Russia’s growing naval rivalry with the United States, citing the decline of U.S. naval capabilities and the growth of the Russian submarine forces. RIA Novosti referred to the observation by Admiral Harris that "Russia’s submarine fleet is second only to the American navy."

RIA Novosti’s reporting reveals not only a pride in the growth of Russian navy, but also gives an indication of Moscow’s ongoing effort to build enthusiasm for its armed forces after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The not so subtle message is that Russia again is able to challenge the United States.

Russian military might is a popular theme in Russia.

In a recent poll conducted by Russia’s leading (and state-run) polling agency, the Russian Public Opinion Center (VTsIOM), the support for the Russian military is rapidly growing, as is the fear of a threat from "foreign nations."

The poll stated that 69% of Russians see a foreign threat to Russia, up from 52% in 2014 and 37% in 2009. A "strong army" is favored by 88%. In a separate report on the same poll, the percent of Russians believing that there is a threat of war against Russia from "other nations" has risen from 56% in 2014 to 65% in the current polling.

While not formally calling the United States an "enemy," the Russian government identifies America as a "threat."

In discussing Russia’s most recent defense strategy, published in January of this year, the chairwoman of the security committee in Russia’s lower legislative chamber (Duma), stated that Russia "objectively assess American political policies …[as]… dangerous for Europe, Russia, and the enter world."

In other words, the Russian political establishment resents American interference (as limited as it is) in Ukraine and the Baltic nations.

At the same time, Russia is supplying nuclear technology to the Islamic Republic of Iran (along with the missile systems to protect Iran’s nuclear installations), Russian troops are present in Ukraine supporting separatist rebels (who appear to be pro-Stalinist), and Russian armed forces threaten the smaller nations of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia.

While American "interference" is condemned, Russian bombers fly into Cuba and Nicaragua, and Moscow projects that it will develop naval stations at various locations in Latin America.

Russia has also redeveloped old Soviet bases in the Arctic and further expanded upon the former Soviet presence at the top of the world. The Peoples Republic of China has joined Russia in the Arctic, just as Russia is supporting China in its aggressive claims in the western Pacific.

The Russian people are being groomed to support a militaristic state with a growing Communist in ideology.

Moscow is attempting to connect seamlessly the Soviet past with present day Russia. One recent example is recounted in a RIA Novosti article on the opening of the "Partisan Village" located near Moscow.

While a chapel is to be built on the premises, the emphasis of the "historical and memorial complex" is centered on Soviet paramilitary forces which fought against invading Nazi armies, often behind the lines. The Russian Defense Minister, General Sergei Shoigu, stated at the opening of "Patriot Village" that the visitors can "immerse themselves in the life of the Soviet underground of the Great Patriotic War."

The "Patriotic Village" fits neatly into Moscow’s rehabilitation of Stalin, who lead the Soviet Union during World War II (although Stalin was an ally of German dictator Adolf Hitler until the surprise Nazi assault on June 22, 1941) . Stalin is portrayed as the hero who saved the Soviet Union, his mass murder of some 20 million is discounted by present Russian leaders as a mistake or an excess. All things Soviet are in the process of being rehabilitated, and Russian politicians now speculate as to "why" the Soviet Union collapsed, while the USSR’s crimes against humanity are forgotten.

The process of bringing some form of a new Soviet state into existence is ongoing and has been in progress since the collapse of the USSR. Vladimir Putin and company are aligned with the Peoples Republic of China, other Communist states, and Islamic terrorism as it fits their purpose. Whoever is the next U.S. President, that individual will face the daunting task of confronting this very dangerous political and military reality. The first step will be to bring U.S. defenses to the point where they can adequately deal with an increasingly militaristic and Communist Russia along with the aggressive Peoples Republic of China.

It is a task requiring an individual who recognizes our perilous situation but who remains determined but steady, a true patriot without bombast. May God guide us in this election year.

[Westerman exposes the Marxist nature of the Kremlin elite in UNCOVERING THE COMMUNIST STRATEGY OF TODAY’S RUSSIA, available at www.inatoday.com.]

Visit Our Other Websites

How you can Help

America's Survival, Inc. is recognized as a 501 (C)3 organization by the IRS. Your donation is tax-deductible to the full extent of the law. Please make your checks payable to America's Survival, Inc. and send them to:

America's Survival. Inc.
P.O. Box 146
Owings, MD 20736

Make a donation online.

Archives

Archives

America's Survival, Inc. is recognized as a 501 (C)3 organization by the IRS. Your donation is tax-deductible to the full extent of the law.