In my ongoing quest for my first keelboat, I looked at a 1977 Catalina 27 today which turned out to have a rather bad complexion. The boat has reportedly been Awlgripped in the past, and I thought this was the Awlgrip cracking, but the owner claims it's gelcoat cracking.

Here are some sample pictures:

breathbox.com/~jmike/77cat27/77cat27-Pages/Image0.html

and

breathbox.com/~jmike/77cat27/77cat27-Pages/Image17.html

(Sorry for the lack of proper links; apparently newbies aren't allowed to submit posts with links, or even text w/ URLs. )

I otherwise liked the boat, so I'd like to know what this problem is and whether it's a hopeless case, and thought I would consult the Oracle (that's you guys ). Thanks for any illumination.

While it is really hard to say for sure, it looks a lot like traditional paint alligatoring due to poor preparation. I don't think the gelcoat would chip off like what is shown in the first photo from just crazing. Poorly adhered paint would though.

BTW, once you get past 10 posts, you'll be able to post links, it's an anti-link-spamming feature...

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..

Looked to me like a couple of those chips were down into the fiberglass. Even so, if there is no water in there, you can fix for relatively cheap. How much is the boat? Are there other features that are very atttractive (new sails)? All these things you need to consider. There are always more boats, especially C-27s.

I took a look at all the pictures of the boat. Walk away. The chainplates have been repositioned...possiblehull damage...extremely poor upkeep...sail repairs needed...terrible gel coat crazing etc. etc....there are way too many problems here for the value of the boat.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Telstar 28
New England

You know what the first rule of sailing is? ...Love. You can learn all the math in the 'verse, but you take
a boat to the sea you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of the worlds. Love keeps
her going when she oughta fall down, tells you she's hurting 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.

—Cpt. Mal Reynolds, Serenity (edited)

If you're new to the Sailnet Forums... please read this To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts..

Cam mentioned that the chainplates have been repositioned. Tell me if I'm wrong, but it looks like they were replaced. I know that on pre-1979 C30s they retrofitted beefier chainplates. The new chainplates on Mike's c27 appear to extend further than the holes in the bulkhead would appear to allow the originals to extend.

Hawg...I agree they have been replaced but it looks like they were moved slightly as well. You would not do that except to correct a problem. I actually owned a 1977 C27 at one point and really thought highly of the sailing qualities of the boat...but this one is a mess.

Im new to sailing also. I bought a boat that has some of these problems. A 18' Cortez (weekend/daysailor). I sail it a couple times a week. Luckly I can store it in a day place. Im a DIY'er so Ive been there.

If you guys are referring to picture #9 for the starboard chainplate, I think that the owner used an old chainplate for a backing plate and the backing plate is what you see. It doens't extend far enough up to get to the side deck and picture 7 shows the port side chainplate in the original location on the forward side of the bulkhead. My guess is the backing plate was put in place to try and stop the bolts from pulling through a rotting bulkhead, as evidenced by the top of the "backing plate" in picture #9. It appears to be sinking into the bulkhead, and the water damage there tends to start at the top. Just my $0.02.

Yikes. I'm humbled (and terrified) at the stuff I stared right at and didn't see. I thought the boat was a bit rough (they all are in my area and price range, it seems), but didn't recognize much of what y'all have pointed out, or at least recognize the severity.

As for the chainplates, the standing rigging was supposedly replaced in 1999, so I believe the chainplate (which were backed on the other side of the bulkheads w/ identical plates) strangeness was probably introduced then.

C'est la vie, the search continues (seeing an S2 7.3 this weekend). My copy of This Old Boat arrived today as well, so I'm putting my head down in that as well.

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register. Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:

Password

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:

Confirm Password:

Email Address

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:

Log-in

User Name

Remember Me?

Password

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.