Public Whip Count

May 01, 2008

More Obama-Clinton on gay rights

Posted by: Chris

With the pivotal (aren't they all?) North Carolina primary just days away, the gay paper there tried a different tactic for getting answers from the candidates on gay rights. Rather than press for phone interviews, Q-Notes apparently sent questions to both campaigns and published the answers.

I say "apparently" because the stories don't say so specifically, but they're credited to "Q-Notes staff" rather than a particular reporter and the answers (especially Hillary Clinton's) read very much like the work of a campaign staffer. This isn't the first time a prominent e-mail/fax interview in the gay press masqueraded as the real thing, and Q-Notes really should have said so explicitly.

That point aside, there are some new nuggets there. In the Clinton Q&A, I was struck how plainly the answerer dodged two direct questions I hadn't heard before. First "she" spoke in generalities when asked whether she would personally introduce legislation to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Defense of Marriage Act -- both wreckage from the first Clinton presidency -- should she lose the nomination and return to the Senate. She also stayed vague about whether she would commit to appointing an openly LGBT cabinet member.

The Obama Q&A broke less new ground, though he also dodged the question about personally introducing bills to repeal DOMA and DADT. Andrew Sullivan did took note of an interesting contrast. Asked to explain how he will keep our interests at heart, Obama turned the tables a bit:

I have always said that I don’t think that the LGBT community should
take its cues from me or some political leader in terms of what they
think is right for them. Real change comes from the bottom up, not the
top down.

Andrew liked what he heard:

This is a core difference between Obama's and Clinton's philosophy, it seems to me. Clinton believes government can save people and she, as the benign representative of government, can bestow equality on minorities. You just have to vote for Democrats, give money to the Democratic party interest groups (like the Human Rights Campaign) and your equality will come eventually (but always later than they say). I prefer an approach that tells gay people that they need to get off their asses, talk to straight people, build their relationships, support their community, empower themselves and win the argument for inclusion and integration.

TrackBack

Comments

So good to see that you're still being your well-informed gracious self. So sorry you have to vent your jealousy that someone got a scoop that you didn't - it might be more professional on your part to simply take quotes from the responses rather than try to paint said sources as fakes. Modesty on behalf of the people at Q-Notes is rather refreshing, given the amount of ego present in so much of the current political DRAMA. Perhaps if you weren't so pleasant Hilary would've called you back? Bless your heart - you don't know no betta.

Well... well someone has been awfully quiet lately about Obama's pastor problem. No sense in beating a dead horse like Obama's presidential aspirations because Indiana will be his graveyard. Can't blame you though for positioning yourself for the jump, just make sure to do it before the whole ship is underwater.