The tech behind it is definitely very interesting (and actually not new), but at the current state I consider it too be still in a very early infancy stage and not practical for real world use. The file format is proprietary, and the final output resolution is too small for it to be anything other than a fancy toy to play around with.

Until they can improve the final output resolution and be more open with the file format, it'll just be an expensive toy for now.

The tech behind it is definitely very interesting (and actually not new), but at the current state I consider it too be still in a very early infancy stage and not practical for real world use. The file format is proprietary, and the final output resolution is too small for it to be anything other than a fancy toy to play around with.

Until they can improve the final output resolution and be more open with the file format, it'll just be an expensive toy for now.

Click to expand...

Yeah, it's very experimental stage. The "fly-eye lens" or lenslet array, is very expensive, and the resolution is extremely limited.

I had dealt with a bit of a lenslet array simulation during my postgraduate work - the algorithm to reconstruct the image from the array can be complicated! So, the one in the mentioned camera is even a few more times complicated than my work itself. (the camera has to reconstruct a thousand of mini-images and reprocess them!)

The same kind of lens is also used in measuring aberrations on the cornea or lens of the human eye, but the reconstruction algorithm is another different thing.