"In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort
experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas,
or values at the same time, or is confronted by new information that conflicts
with existing beliefs, ideas, or values." (Cognitive
dissonance, Wikipedia)

Visits With The Elders:

(The following are accounts of meetings with LDS elders
(missionaries) in 2014; and the Mormon spokesman who ran interference)

(First Visit):

The LDS missionaries came over along with an older LDS man. All three men sat
through me reading the first article in my LDS Series (The Book of Mormon);
then, they allowed me to read my short work about my Near Death Experience; then
I quit reading and shared my Christian testimony.

At this point I asked the group if they had anything to share. The older LDS man
was evidently the spokesman for the group. He talked for over an hour without
addressing one point I made in my LDS article.

When he was finished speaking I asked the group if they knew who Josiah Stowell
was. The older man said no. I asked if they knew who Joseph Knight was. The
older man said no. I mentioned that those men were Joseph Smith's close
associates, who were both at the Smith house when Smith supposedly got the
golden plates and that Knight wrote a history (Joseph Knight’s Recollection of Early
Mormon History) of the event which can be found @ the Maxwell Institute.

I mentioned that Knight claimed the plates went back into the box by some unseen
power after Joseph Smith set the plates down then I asked the group if they had
ever heard of that? (see documentation)

The older man said no.

I asked,

"Why is it that I know more about early LDS history than you?"

His response:

"If you want to begin a relationship with the Savior, then
you should invite the elders over again because they are emissaries of
Christ."

He said that after I shared my Christian testimony of a
powerful vision and born again experience I had back in 1977, on the evening I asked Jesus to be my
savior, other experiences I've had in God, a brief history of my Christian
walk over the last 37 years, including four years of bible college, my divine
calling as an author; and, my recent two and a half year ministry on the worship team of a
local Spirit Filled Baptist Church. (my
born again experience)

(sigh)

He then said that the elders held keys and had the Holy Spirit.

When I said,

"I am also an emissary of Christ and have received the
Holy Spirit,"

the older man laughed.

I thanked the men for coming over and listening to me; I even told them I was
proud of them for coming. It was kind of fun fellowshipping with the group; it
wasn't all lecture.

...

Ask a Mormon Then Get The Runaround:

I did mention to the older LDS man that he did not address any of the problems I
brought up in my article on the Book of Mormon, to which he replied,

"It was filled with supposition."

Then, he tried to cast doubt on the points I made in
the article by saying:

"We know where the City of Zarahemla is!"

So, I asked him:

"Where is the City of Zarahemla?"

His reply:

"I'm not going to tell you."

I said,

"Why don't you just tell me where it is?"

His answer:

"Do an Internet search and you will find it."

So, I searched the Internet using the words,

"Where is the City of Zarahemla?"

This is what I found:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 2010
Book of Mormon Convention:

"Scholars gathered in Provo, Utah, to discuss their
theories about where the events described in the Book of Mormon took place.
Some placed the Nephite capital city
Zarahemla in Mesoamerica, others in South America. Others argued for a setting
in the American heartland.

The president of The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints attended the two-day Book of Mormon convention. Although he
found the discussion interesting, he was obviously concerned that people were
getting a little too worked up about their geographic theories. He decided to
intervene.

The Book of Mormon geography conference was held at
Brigham Young Academy on May 23-24, 1903. But the advice President Joseph F.
Smith gave at that conference 107 years ago could apply equally to current
disputes over Book of Mormon geography.

'President Smith spoke briefly,' the Deseret News
account summarized, 'and expressed the idea that
the question of the city (of
Zarahemla) was one of interest certainly, but if it could not be located the
matter was not of vital importance, and if there were differences of opinion on
the question it would not affect the salvation of the people...'" (The
fight over Book of Mormon geography, Michael De Groote, Deseret News, May 27
2010)

Obviously, the LDS (Mormon) Church has no clue
as to where the Book of Mormon City of Zarahemla is!

Therefore, it appears that the older man's challenge was
just a diversion.

On the subject of Book of Mormon geography, renowned LDS archaeologist Thomas Stuart
Ferguson spelled out:

"…you can’t set Book of Mormon geography down anywhere
- because it is fictional..." (letter to Mr. & Mrs. H.W. Lawrence, dated Feb.
20, 1976)

My article on the Book of Mormon comes to the same
conclusion.

...

The LDS Spokesman Calls Me a Liar:

As soon as I finished reading part one of my LDS Series (The
Book of Mormon) the
LDS spokesman said:

"You didn't write that did you?"

I answered:

"Yes, I did."

Then he said:

"You really didn't write it; that's not your article!"

...

This is a typical ad hominem tactic:

"... genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided
by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person
making the argument ..."
(ad hominem, Wikipedia)

By accusing me of taking credit for another man's work,
the man was clearly attacking my character. While there is no truth in what he claimed, it
made for a great distraction. Yet, one might wonder if this accusation,
along with his other behavior:

• rolling his eyes.

• laughing out loud.

• making false claims,

and,

• refusing to participate in a search for supporting evidence,

was really an appropriate way to determine if Mormonism is
true?

What I wanted to do was talk about the Book of Mormon's
final great wars of extinction: ◄(see
documentation)

...

A Few More Details:

For the last 30
minutes the older man continued on in a,

"if you (me) want to be useful in serving the Lord,"

mode.

He was saying that there were three levels of glory and I was on the
lowest level because I was not,

"one of us."

He said that while looking
at the elders.

It was them vs. me: they had the glory and I didn't. So, at that point I
asked the group if they ever heard of Joseph Smith's 1826 Glass Looking Trial?
The older man answered,

"No."

I pointed out a few things brought out in witness testimony, such as the dead
Indian who was watching over the treasure and how Joseph Smith saw that by
looking into a seer stone. And, how that was the same type of yarn from
which Mormonism was born — early American folklore.
(see documentation)

When I asked the LDS spokesman to go to LDS.org and do a
search for Joseph Smith's seer stone, his reply was:

One year later, during a 2015 Press Conference, the LDS Church
released images of Joseph Smith's chocolate-colored seer stone and confirmed
that it was used to translate the Book of Mormon: (see
documentation)

(Photograph by Welden C. Andersen and Richard E. Turley Jr.)

"The stone pictured here has long been
associated with Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon translation. The
stone Joseph Smith used in the Book of Mormon translation effort was
often referred to as a chocolate-colored stone with an oval shape." (Joseph
the Seer, Ensign, October 2015)

...

(Second Visit):

In
the first place, one elder was new. I did not ask what happened to the other
elder. So, only one of the men was present during the last visit when the older
LDS spokesman was running interference: rolling his eyes, laughing, etc. That
man, by his use of body language, laughter, and flat out denials, tried to make
it seem like everything I presented was a joke.

This time, the elders and I went through two more of
my articles on the LDS faith:

those articles are chock-full of quotes
about Joseph Smith's seer stones, mostly from past Ensign magazines,
which verified everything I had previously said.

What I am/was wondering: Is the elder who was here
during our first visit thinking:

"Wow, Rich was right all along?"

...

(Third Visit):

The LDS elders
came back and we went through a Family Home Evening Lesson, Lesson One: Am I a
Seeker of Truth, in its entirety.
(go
to FHE lesson)

These were not the same elders who came over the first time a few months back;
first of all, one of them was replaced and then the other one; so yesterday only
one of them had been over before. Therefore, I started by going through some
material which was covered the last time to bring the new man up to date on
Joseph Smith's seer stone history; which was the subject matter of our lesson.

We started by reading the first two pages of a BYU Studies work entitled Joseph
Knight's Recollection of Early Mormon History in PDF format. The elders had no
knowledge of Joseph failing to follow the spirit's instruction correctly by
setting the plates down on the ground and not just taking them and going home.
They did not know that Joseph was then instructed to bring his eldest brother
with him the next year on the same day. (see
documentation)

They had never heard about the plates
going back in the box on their own. Nor, had they heard about Joseph looking in
his glass (seer-stone) to see who the next right person to bring would be after his brother
died.

Then we looked at a few quotes from Ensign magazines about Smith's seer stone
use. Then, I read to them the entire FHE lesson. It was a brutal read. The
tension in the room was so high that my dog sensed it and started chewing on his
dog bed; which he never does.

(Yukon)

One elder looked like his whole world was imploding; and, for good reason. Also,
all the way through the read there were times when the family members (elders)
were supposed to chime in with a response. No responses were given even though I
turned to them and made it clear that they could interact with me in the read
and that I might even modify the work based upon their input.

At the end of FHE Lesson One, where readers are deemed to
be

"genuine seekers of truth"

if they
go on to study more about the subject matter covered in the lesson, one of the elders responded
to the challenge. Not the one who
looked like he was in shock the whole time; it was the one who kept his
composure. The answer he gave me was,

I then suggested we go outside where we could get some fresh air
and share our ideas on what we just studied. That did not happen. I was
immediately given the standard testimony of the Church being true based upon a
witness in the spirit.

So, I gave my testimony:

I spoke of the night when I prayed and asked Jesus to be my savior and how a
blanket of love surrounded me all through the night until the next morning.

Then, I mentioned that about a month later as I was praying, all of a sudden it
felt like a huge river of water was flowing up my throat and out of my mouth; I immediately
opened my eyes expecting to see the living room half filled with water.

I explained that later I read a passage from the bible which proclaims:

"Now on the last day, the great day of the feast, Jesus
stood and cried out, saying, 'If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and
drink. 'He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, 'From his innermost being
will flow rivers of living water'" (John 7:37-38)

I went on to say that in my life I have brought many
people to Christ; and, so I believe this scripture was fulfilled. Then, I looked at the Elders and
said:

"I too am a missionary."

At that point they did something I would never have
expected: [Apparently] They fully accepted me as a brother. No longer was there a need for me
to become a Mormon; they could tell, I already had a saving knowledge in Christ.

Was I disappointed that they were not interested in me reading the next study in
my series?

No.

Because, I believe they were just trying to leave with their testimonies still
in place; they will have plenty of time to think things over; and, I left the
door wide open for them to come back.

The End of the Story:

During our visit I was told that it costs about $10,000.00 per year
for each Elder to fund his mission and the one steadfast Elder said to me:

"It is well worth it!"

As he said that, I got the feeling that the Elder beside
him was seriously wondering if his time and money were being well spent.

As for why they kept coming back, perhaps it is/was, because I am using all
approved LDS quotes in my works and my attitude and demeanor is that of a good
brother. However, yesterday the LDS quotes were much more eye-opening than the
ones found in the previous studies and the study itself was rather long. It really
pushed the men to the point of seeing something was seriously wrong with their
faith. I would think that yesterday, learning what they did about early Mormon
history may very well make the rest of their mission less glamorous: Now, their
mission is to promote Faithful LDS History by hiding from and/or, ignoring what
is spelled out on their Church's own website. (see
documentation)

We did meet again at the Seattle Temple grounds; the
cognitive dissonance which was so obvious during that visit is documented in the
article: