New £130m rail link to London approved

A £130m rail link between Oxford and London Marylebone has been given approval.

The Secretary of State for Transport cleared the way for Chiltern Railways to expand its service in an announcement yesterday.

The move effectively gives thousands of Oxford commuters a second choice for travelling to London and opens up a route to High Wycombe that has been closed since the 1960s. It will involve building a connecting line in Bicester and modernising the Oxford to Bicester route. Once complete it will become the first new rail link between London and a major city in 100 years.

The scheme will see two new platforms at Oxford station and a new station built at Water Eaton park-and-ride, just outside Kidlington.

Bicester Town and Islip stations would also be rebuilt as part of the project, which will allow trains to run at up to 100mph between Oxford and Bicester on double tracks, in place of the existing single track.

Projected journey times are 66 minutes between Oxford and London, and 14 minutes from Oxford to Bicester.

That compares with the current journey time of Oxford to London Paddington of typically 55 minutes and Oxford to Bicester of 25 minutes.

There will be two trains between Oxford and London Marylebone each way every hour, in addition to the existing four.

Promoted stories

The news was welcomed by campaigners.

Hugh Jaeger, spokesman for Thames Valley branch of Rail Future, welcomed the news and said it added pressure for Oxford to get a better railway station.

He said: “Rail Future warmly welcomes Oxford having a second route to London because this increases capacity between Oxford and London and also increases resilience. It means if there are ever problems on one London route Oxford still has another rail link.

“This will save thousands of passengers the grief of trying to get into Oxford and getting stuck in Botley Road.

“Bringing on the Evergreen 3 scheme also raises pressure for Oxford to have a better railway station.”

Work is expecting to begin early next year and the operator said trains will start running from Oxford to London Marylebone from 2015.

The announcement comes days after plans to reopen the East West Rail link from Oxford to Bedford via Bicester took a step forward.

A Joint Delivery Board has been set up to oversee the project to bring a mothballed section of track back into use.

Passenger trains would run from Reading to Bedford via Oxford, Bicester Town station and Milton Keynes, and from London Marylebone to Milton Keynes.

Oxfordshire County Council’s transport chief Rodney Rose, also deputy leader and deputy chairman of the East West Rail Delivery Board, welcomed the £130m project.

He said: “Anything along that line, including electrification, is fantastic. Another option for going to London is great, and this provides better links between Oxford and Bicester with Bicester being a major growth area in the county.”

He said eventually the East West line would also take freight trains helping to relieve pressure on the A34.

Graham Cross, business development director of Chiltern Railways, said: “We are pleased to have been granted the power to proceed with this significant railway investment, which will benefit thousands of commuters and businesses in Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire.

“The Oxford to London link is the latest in a long line of innovative Chiltern-led projects to upgrade the rail infrastructure, fuelled by our understanding of rail’s potential to make a significant contribution to economic growth and prosperity.”

Share article

TIMELINE

July 2012 – Petition calling for a 40mph limit on the track through Wolvercote, signed by more than 300 residents, handed to Oxford West and Abingdon MP Nicola Blackwood.

May 2012 – Inquiry into the scheme is reopened to examine concerns about the impact of the scheme on bats in Wolvercot Tunnel. Residents from North Oxford raise concerns about noise and vibrations from the trains.

November 2011 – Planning inspector withholds approval of the scheme because of the impact on bats.

November 2010 – Inquiry into the scheme begins.

October 2010 – Chiltern Railways submits a revised plan for a new bridge at the Langford Lane crossing as part of its £250m rail route between Oxford and London, via Bicester.

June 2010 – Oxfordshire County Council warns it will lodge a formal objection to a plan to create a second Oxford-London railway route unless it receives assurances on a number of issues.

January 2010 – The Department of Transport, Chiltern Railways and Network Rail agree to a £250m upgrade of the Chiltern main line

April 2009 – Chiltern Railways advertise for firms to design and build the £200m project.

April 2009 – Chiltern Railways launches a public consultation on proposals in Bicester.

Promoted Stories

Comments (6)

So now how about looking at a track to run along side the A40 from Carterton to join the existing line at Wolvercote and on to Oxford in place of a dual carriageway and more cars.

So now how about looking at a track to run along side the A40 from Carterton to join the existing line at Wolvercote and on to Oxford in place of a dual carriageway and more cars.Englishman

So now how about looking at a track to run along side the A40 from Carterton to join the existing line at Wolvercote and on to Oxford in place of a dual carriageway and more cars.

Score: 2

Victor's_friend says...9:59am Fri 19 Oct 12

Is that train driver Richard Smith really trying to check the destination sign on the front of the train. Thought it would be safer to get onto the platform since there is no foot or handrails to do. If he fell or sustained injury would it be his own fault. This project seems really exciting and I'm staggered by the low cost compared to other rail projects. Maybe HS2 definitely needs a rethink because if all these projects like this can happen along the proposed route the sum may be substantially cheaper than just HS2 and benefit mainly PASSENGERS ON WHAT SHOULD BE PUBLIC TRANSPORT. The private train companies have for far too long ignored their real purpose. The sum of all these projects will hopefully create a more cohesive network, something that was designed so well way before Beeching got his hatchet plan.

Is that train driver Richard Smith really trying to check the destination sign on the front of the train. Thought it would be safer to get onto the platform since there is no foot or handrails to do. If he fell or sustained injury would it be his own fault.
This project seems really exciting and I'm staggered by the low cost compared to other rail projects. Maybe HS2 definitely needs a rethink because if all these projects like this can happen along the proposed route the sum may be substantially cheaper than just HS2 and benefit mainly PASSENGERS ON WHAT SHOULD BE PUBLIC TRANSPORT. The private train companies have for far too long ignored their real purpose. The sum of all these projects will hopefully create a more cohesive network, something that was designed so well way before Beeching got his hatchet plan.Victor's_friend

Is that train driver Richard Smith really trying to check the destination sign on the front of the train. Thought it would be safer to get onto the platform since there is no foot or handrails to do. If he fell or sustained injury would it be his own fault. This project seems really exciting and I'm staggered by the low cost compared to other rail projects. Maybe HS2 definitely needs a rethink because if all these projects like this can happen along the proposed route the sum may be substantially cheaper than just HS2 and benefit mainly PASSENGERS ON WHAT SHOULD BE PUBLIC TRANSPORT. The private train companies have for far too long ignored their real purpose. The sum of all these projects will hopefully create a more cohesive network, something that was designed so well way before Beeching got his hatchet plan.

Score: 5

Victor's_friend says...10:02am Fri 19 Oct 12

Surely the driver is stroking his engine

Surely the driver is stroking his engineVictor's_friend

Surely the driver is stroking his engine

Score: 1

carli says...6:48pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Has everyone checked with Richard Branson that he is happy with it????

Has everyone checked with Richard Branson that he is happy with it????carli

Has everyone checked with Richard Branson that he is happy with it????

Score: 0

faatmaan says...8:43pm Fri 19 Oct 12

again transport policy is directed to the affluent few that can afford rail travel and live in Oxford !

again transport policy is directed to the affluent few that can afford rail travel and live in Oxford !faatmaan

again transport policy is directed to the affluent few that can afford rail travel and live in Oxford !

Score: -3

deltic08 says...12:18am Mon 5 Nov 12

Oh goodee, yet more rail infrastructure in the South when the North is creaking under the weight of overcrowded trains. It has nothing to do with the PM and his connections with Oxfordshire of course. Reinstating Church Fenton-Wetherby-Harr ogate-Ripon-Northall erton would remove all daytime freight off the east Coast main line between Doncaster and Newcastle to allow more high speed passenger trains, at the same time reconnecting Tadcaster, Wetherby and Ripon to the rail system. More freight and passenger trains would use this route than East-West rail at a similar cost in construction but nobody will listen at the DfT because it is in the North. Just makes me sick at the inequality practised by Governments as far as North/South divide is concerned.

Oh goodee, yet more rail infrastructure in the South when the North is creaking under the weight of overcrowded trains. It has nothing to do with the PM and his connections with Oxfordshire of course.
Reinstating Church Fenton-Wetherby-Harr
ogate-Ripon-Northall
erton would remove all daytime freight off the east Coast main line between Doncaster and Newcastle to allow more high speed passenger trains, at the same time reconnecting Tadcaster, Wetherby and Ripon to the rail system. More freight and passenger trains would use this route than East-West rail at a similar cost in construction but nobody will listen at the DfT because it is in the North. Just makes me sick at the inequality practised by Governments as far as North/South divide is concerned.deltic08

Oh goodee, yet more rail infrastructure in the South when the North is creaking under the weight of overcrowded trains. It has nothing to do with the PM and his connections with Oxfordshire of course. Reinstating Church Fenton-Wetherby-Harr ogate-Ripon-Northall erton would remove all daytime freight off the east Coast main line between Doncaster and Newcastle to allow more high speed passenger trains, at the same time reconnecting Tadcaster, Wetherby and Ripon to the rail system. More freight and passenger trains would use this route than East-West rail at a similar cost in construction but nobody will listen at the DfT because it is in the North. Just makes me sick at the inequality practised by Governments as far as North/South divide is concerned.

Ipsoregulated

This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standardards Organisations's Editors' Code of Practice. If you have a compaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here