Not to be rude, but I have no idea why you've posted that once, let alone twice with the same verbiage. In short, I don't see the cat.

It was such a brilliant and incredibly humorous post that he couldn't live with the thought that someone might not have seen it seeing as we hit a new page. Bravo sir Alfrik for making sure we couldn't miss such humor. You are a giant among men and you deserve the highest accolades that can be given for your mastery of entertainment, and for going above and beyond in making sure to bring such overwhelming amusement to the masses.

Is legit. That's a pretty accurate description given that Columbus thought he'd found the East Indies. Certainly a lot more accurate than, "In 1492 Columbus discovered America", which is almost 100% false.

Not to be rude, but I have no idea why you've posted that once, let alone twice with the same verbiage. In short, I don't see the cat.

It was such a brilliant and incredibly humorous post that he couldn't live with the thought that someone might not have seen it seeing as we hit a new page. Bravo sir Alfrik for making sure we couldn't miss such humor. You are a giant among men and you deserve the highest accolades that can be given for your mastery of entertainment, and for going above and beyond in making sure to bring such overwhelming amusement to the masses.

Yikes, someone's a bit sour today. I posted it because I realized it was bounced a page back and the quote on the top of this page would not refrence it correctly.

How about I go back and delete both?

FYI: for the humour challenged today, I was poking fun at the fact a Pony escaped containment and showed up on a front page article.

Well, what prompted my original response wasn't that I didn't understand it - I knew the story which prompted it, I just didn't understand why it would be in the thread. I chalked that up to me not having the same sense of humor as Alfrik. It was indeed the double-posting, as you point out, which prompted me to say something.

Again, not meaning to be rude Alfrik, it just didn't seem to warrant the double post in this case - to me at least.