He is vastly inferior to both. Djokovic is just Wilander Mk II, who is another player with more slams than he deserves.

and who are you to tell us who deserves what? Is this God himself? nice trolling btw. I bet you've never seen either Edberg or Boris 'playing tennis'. . oh boy ... does Fed 'deserve' 17 slams? please enlighten me Dear God Caesar? Thank you.

Edberg and Becker were also great players. Two legends. I am not saying that he surpassed them already. But he certainly mached them.
Djokovic will probably stay longer at nr. 1 then both of them.
What really would boost Djokovic is a Roland Garros crown. Because he has than won the career grand slam. Than he is well heading in the direction of players like Nadal or Agassi.
In terms of tennis ability I think he is already on the same class as Agassi. But he is statistically not yet in the same class. Because Agassi won Roland Garros and olympic gold.
Nadal is a bit further away than Agassi, because he won mopre slams. But Djokovic does not need to win as much slams as Nadal to be in the same class. Nadal never won the YEC by example. And his performacnes outside clay courts were very good but not exceptional. Djokovic could also surpass Nadals nr. 1 weeks count.

It's nothing against Djokovic in particular, it's just a result of the change in conditions. Over the next couple of decades I believe we will see more players accumulate more slams, and I think it will come to be an accepted fact that Slam counts don't mean what they used to. Homogenised/non-homogenised surface slam counts will be just as much apples and oranges as Open/Amateur era slam counts are regarded currently.

It's hilarious how everyone jumps on me and calls me a Federer fan just for saying that. God knows why. I am sure Federer's Slam count will be seen in a different light for the same reasons.