Hi folks, I'm Alan
Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on April the 7th 2009.

There's always people
coming into the show, so I advise them to go into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on my website, you'll find hundreds and hundreds of talks in the
past that I've given, where I try to give you the information that's relevant
to understanding the big-big picture of this World Order that's openly
announced, from the tops of the G20 meetings and from different governments'
officials etc. It's in our face today; and I try to show you how it's come about,
where it's supposed to go, because, in a sense, it's a never-ending story. It's
an on-going agenda, where man is the material and those who believe that they
have the scientific means and who can break down laws of nature and utilise
them, they can use us indefinitely, by creating new types of perfected humans,
or humanoid types, as they said in Artificial Intelligence, the movie. That's
where they're going with this and they haven't just started with this, the
social engineers have been at this for a long time, because it's built into the
very fabric of the belief of world socialism, as something that has used all
groups, working classes and then minority groups etc, to push an agenda which
is nothing more than getting laws and bureaucracies built up across the world,
for a global government that then will be a very authoritarian government, you
can't move without permission; that's the whole idea of it. So, I try to give
you the information, to bring it altogether.

Every country and
every ethnic group has its leaders supplied to them; that's standard in all of
this. That's also what Adam Weishaupt said they'd do; because, after all, to
get people to follow the tribal instinct, you've got to give them a tribal
leader that says all the right things for you and you follow along like happy
sheep.

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can download / print up.
They're written in the various languages of Europe and you can pass them around
to your friends.

Those who keep me
going, buy the material on the website www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com or they can donate to me, at that site, either with PayPal or personal
cheque is fine in the US and Canada. Or, you can write to [listed above].

And that, as I say,
keeps me ticking over; and as we all know, there's inflation on the go,
everything's going up in price, everyone's suffering, lots have lost their jobs
and there's much more, apparently, to come, according to the big economists at
the top. They said it takes about 18 months for the full impact of a depression
to hit; and, of course, it's a planned depression, because this is the key to
understanding socialism, or fascism, because, really, it's the same thing, it's
the same thing. Socialism is slightly different from the Communist take-over,
Communism does it in a hurry, by revolution and bloody revolution; and
socialism, as in the Fabian technique, uses gradualism and the taking over of
governments, from within, across the world, but still having private-public
enterprises that bring them together. Once you go back round that circle, you
find you call it fascism again; so, it's one and the same thing. That's exactly
what Mussolini did, when he put laws over the restrictions of certain
corporations, but they were on board, public-private.

Back with more
-after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I'm Alan
Watt, this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about fascism and socialism.
You have to look into the history of Mussolini who really was supposedly called
the first fascist and the society he presided over was fascist; but, if you
look into his history, he was the chief editor for the Italian socialist
newspaper for years before he was called a fascist. It's one and the same
thing, as I say: you go round in a loop of socialism and you end up at the end
with fascism.

They love “isms” -
"ism" really means a doctrine, of a doctrine. Really, authoritarian
systems are all, technically, fascist in their approach to their main topic.
The topic is and their objective is control, complete control over the rest of
the population. That's societal control, actually birth control, you might say,
because they're all into depopulation, down to a manageable level, especially
getting rid of the ‘inferior types’ and bringing in the ‘superior types’ and
breeding them up. Now they've gone one step further, of course, by the use of
science and genetics. That's why the big thrust was on for genetic research,
not to cure anything, the way to get rid of bad genes is to let them die off,
they don't want to cure you of diseases, if you inherit any, and therefore
they'd have the good stock left. That was put out plainly by Charles Galton
Darwin, the physicist, the grandson of Charles Darwin, in his book The Next
Million Years; and many others have reiterated on that topic from the top,
because they all go along with it.

We've heard them
talk about the need to use tranquilisers on the public, sedate them; Aldous
Huxley, author of Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited, he's up on
Youtube and different other sites as well, with his old lectures, his old talks
he gave at Berkeley and his television conversations that he had with some
well-know people, talking about this very topic. Overpopulation was one of his
main concerns too; and of course we know that Julian Huxley, I read from Julian
Huxley's book, on air, to show you that he was right along with this agenda.
These guys were totalitarian, authoritarian; and, basically, fascist or
socialist - you can take your pick, it doesn't matter what you want to call it,
it's one and the same thing.

And for many years
now, we've watched the blending of public-private partnerships; years and
years, before 9/11 came along; and in Britain, they had Prince Charles come out
and announce the need for more and more public-private partnerships. You see,
public and private, what they're really saying is private corporations and your
government, that's what they mean (which is fascism, that's fascism). You tie
that in with what they're doing to the public and where they want to take the
public; and look at all the changes we've had, the massive changes we've had,
even prior to 9/11. They tried to bring in the ID cards, before 9/11, in some
European countries, with the live active chip in it as well. They tried that in
Britain but people rejected it, there was demonstrations against it, because
nothing was happening; the Cold War, we were told, was all over and the
capitalists had won, everything was going to sail along. So, they shelved that
and they had to get something going because terrorism would be the answer.

Government,
remember, for centuries, has validated its existence by telling the public that
'you need us to defend you'; and, for centuries, certain families at the top of
the tree, royalties, would point the finger to their cousins across the water
and get you up to go and fight for them. That was the old way of keeping you in
line, it killed off the excess population, according to them; and they profited
very well from it. They never lost, because they never killed the kings and
queens when they won, they made little agreements, shook their hands, had a
party and went home; and, no doubt, split their profits.

That's how it has
always been; today the very-very rich use governments to collect money for
them, it's a substitute for war, they do it through taxation and laws and those
at the top always ensure that the corporations, the big international
corporations, go unscathed through thick and thin. We saw this with the banking
bailouts, where the very rich were rewarded for raping and pillaging a planet
and the tax payer has to pay for it all. They won't change the system
technically, they'll do a few minor adjustments, to keep us all happy, but the
same old system will go on; and we have to foot the bill, every time. However,
to keep government strong, they've got to have terrorism.

In a world society,
remember, you need an enemy; and the Club of Rome (a big think-tank) was given
the challenge of finding an enemy to unite the world. They came up with the
idea of saying that mankind itself was the enemy of the planet and came up with
'global warming'. Then they called it 'climate change' because the warming
theory's kind of fallen flat, but they changed to 'climate change' and
repetition works, everybody's prattling on about 'climate change'. Therefore,
that's how they validated it, plus there's terrorism everywhere. We saw this in
George Orwell's "1984", in the novel (you can also get the black and
white television version, or a movie version, with Richard Burton and John Hurt
in it, it's done very well). Perpetual war; and a few people, a few of us knew
at the very beginning, that, under terrorism, the guise of information and data
collection would expand, that was the intention of it, in the first place,
until everything becomes terrorism and anyone can be checked out by any authority.
There's more and more expanding and multiplicity of authorities now than you
even count, you can't count, there's so many, so many departments, all given
access to your personal data. Just like the Soviet Union, because, after all,
the Soviet Union and China (it's still called “Red China” by the way) they are
authoritarian governments that use these techniques; and anytime they want
someone, they can simply punch up their number and find something that you’ve
done wrong.

You can't help
doing something wrong today, or illegal, because there are so many laws on the
books. Recently, in fact, I watched the British version of “Cops”, the
propaganda ‘Hurrah Hurrah’ for the police. A propaganda series they have in
Britain, where they lock-down cities, with their Interceptor cars, they use all
this military terminology amongst each other on the radio. They have
supercomputers in all cars, they don't even have to read number plates, because
the computers, on the highways do it all for them, automatically; and three
teams of police from different areas, working on the same city, were having a
competition to see who could give the most tickets out, the most charges laid
and the one that was running behind, without charges, the guy was asked what
will you do? He says I'll use my policeman's nose and you watched how they
managed to get charges laid, for irrelevant things; even antagonising the
people to say something, so they could arrest them. That's the modern society,
that's a police state, when they compete, when police departments compete to
hand out tickets.

You know, the KGB
in the Soviet Union, once they started using computers, simply had issuances
every month for statistics and quotas and they had to go and fill those quotas,
torture people and kill them, because they had to have so many that month.
That's where it's all heading, I kid you not; I kid you not.

You have to go into
the understanding of Game Theory, and I've talked about this before, where I've
given links to very good documentaries on the Game Theory, this Rand
Corporation idea, that really is world wide, with every government using it,
where they have everyone numbered. They have your routines and your patterns of
your behaviour figured out and they're watching you daily now, with the Internet
and your email and your phone conversations, to make sure you're following your
pattern, your predicted pattern. Anything that's non-predictable and anybody
who's non-predictable is a threat to this system and control freaks must make
sure you are perfectly predictable. And it goes much-much further than that,
because they use economists and crazy people in fact; you ever wondered about
schizophrenia, how people who are more emotionally-based, maybe right brain
based will have emotional topics in their particular delusions and so on?

When you go into
the top scientists, even the guy who came up with the idea of Game Theory, Mr.
Nash, who truly was a paranoid schizophrenic; but he was also into mathematics
and economics and all the top governments use economists, to do with their data
collection, because they use mathematics to predict how societies will go,
including every one of you, according to the groups and subgroups that you
belong to and associate with. Therefore, when they go off the deep end, you should
see some of their books in fact, I have some of them here, by the top ones; and
there's nothing human in it, it's all statistics and graphs and numbers and
quotas, again and quotients as well. They try to rationalise and figure out the
future with mathematics, the same thing that Bertrand Russell was hyped on
about; he said the perfect language that he understood was mathematics. What he
was referring to was the fact that he was doing the stuff that Rand is now
doing, before Rand was doing it. Incredible, and people are looked upon, the
general public, are looked upon, not as people but as objects, objects. When
you're given a number, instead of a name, you're an object, it's part of the
depersonalisation process, for those who will handle you, especially the
bureaucrats. It's well understood, by historians, that the bureaucracies that
ran the camps in World War II, for Germany, like IBM that was involved and
brought the Cardex system out, used the numbers for this very reason, the
bureaucrats found it easy to control and do things with the people, because
they were not people anymore.

Back with more -
after this break.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan
Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about those who are used
by the ones at the top, to bring in more assured system of control and they use
people who, technically, are more left-brained in their make-up than right
brained: mathematicians, guys who love statistics. People who, if they become
psychotic, can sound to someone who's not informed, maybe even logical, the way
they try and spin things together, because they don't go off into such
emotional tangents. But they're used and, in ancient times, they used to get
wise men or seers or witches, like the ‘Witch of Endor’, who were often
classified as mad. They used to say that the demon that possessed them made
them mad; but regardless, they were all classified, basically, as mad, not just
eccentric.

Today, it's no
different, it's no different whatsoever, because they pay people very-very
well, like Mr. Nash, to come up with these amazing programmes to predict
society and predict, it's all to do with predictions you see, control freaks
are terrified of something outside of their control, so the predictions that
come in from these guys at the top, that they can utilise and use, to maintain
control are very-very important. You go into these particular mathematicians
and economists’ books and the ones who are into the Game Theory idea, which is
still on-going, by the way, they've upgraded it, before they were using Kant
and different people and they'll tell you that. They reel off one philosopher
after another and what you find is they have no minds of their own; they can't
think of anything original, they have to take previous philosophers and use
their theories, for maybe a generation or two, then add it to someone else's
theories. It's always attaching theory to theory to theory, that is
left-brained again, because they have no imagination, they can't think for
themselves. Therefore they can only regurgitate what's been said in the past,
even if it's craziness that’s been said in the past, they regurgitate it and
try to make it work in the present and in the future, it's astonishing. And
they feed all this data and all our data into their massive computers; and now
they're all labelling everyone, in different categories; you see, you're not a
person, as I say, you're depersonalised when you become a number. IBM used this
in World War II, that's why the Nazi Regime could have bureaucrats making
decisions, the bureaucrats never went to the camps; they just dealt with
numbers. These were people but they were numbers, they depersonalise them by
using numbers; therefore, they're not really saying to eliminate so many
people, they're saying eliminate these numbers, it makes it more palatable to
them.

It's the same thing
with us; we've had social insurance numbers, SIN numbers (they're called SIN
for a good reason) and they call them social insurance programmes, not
services, programmes. What do you think a programme is? You're in a social
programme, whose social programme? We never question; but, as I say, you should
go into the books by some of these present-day London School of Economics and
others’ books to do with Game Theory and the updated version they're now
running everything on today. Fascinating: run by psychopaths and, basically,
left-brain schizophrenics; nothing changes.

Here's an article
here; and before I go into this article on ID cards, which is astonishing again
because it breaks out in the US and Britain and elsewhere at the same time,
everything's in unison now, we're all global, as they say. You'll notice during
hostage-taking: the negotiator that tries to negotiate with the hostage takers,
tries to personalise the victims, the hostages, by saying and they'll use their
names, that's how you help to personalise, you put a name to the face that's
under the gun, hoping that the hostage taker will see them as a person now, not
as a target or an implement, to be used in bargaining. To reverse that
decision: you simply use a number and take away the name, it's the same thing;
think about it.

We're being run by
scientists and supposed experts in a totalitarian regime that has told us that
this is just the beginning, if you think it's bad now, as we go into this
wonderful world of equality and happiness and drastically reduce our population
and our consumption and all the rest of it, until we're happy to get a drink of
water, that we'll pay dearly for, because it will be owned by a global corporation.

From the BBC, it
says:

ID cards 'could use chip-and-pin'

Tuesday, 7th
April 2009. I'm reading this because I've got another article on the US on the
same thing, at the same time. It says:

The UK's ID cards could be fitted with chip-and-pin technology to tackle
identity fraud, the head of the agency responsible for them has
said.

I can remember
watching a documentary in Canada, CBC, 1998, by Wendy Mesley; and she went
through this whole ID card with the active chip in it, at the time. It was
already done then, it was a voluntary basis, 1998. These ID cards are just a
rehash that they're giving out now of the ones they tried to bring in Britain
in 1998. It's the same ones; they're already fitted with the chip. You know,
with a totalitarian regime, you cannot negotiate. Neither can you ever say
you've won any battle, because they'll always come back again, these boys at
the top have an agenda and nothing is going to put them off. Asking them nicely
is not going to do it.

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I'm Alan
Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the ID cards and how they
never give up, because, years ago I mentioned the fact that the ID card was to
be eventually used as a bank card and for everything else that you do, with an
active chip. They never change their plans, these guys at the top, why should
they? Because it's a must-be, it's a religion with them, it's a must-be; and
here they are reintroducing the idea. You see, now that they've got the card
out, step by step, you accept one card, you accept the next one; and in '98, as
I say, they already had discussed on Canadian television, the whole card with
the chip and using it with your bank machine as well. There's nothing new under
the sun here. Now, here's how they're going to sell it to the public: they say
"there's no technical obstacles to the idea" - in other words, it's a
done deal. This is the head, the guy who makes them.

He said this could allow ID cards to be used in cash machines and help
online consumers "assert their identities".

There you go: to
help you assert your identity, not for them to control you. Remember what
Russell said: eventually you'll all be given a sort of ration card and the
government will dish out credits per month. And every month, it'll start off at
the same level, you can't save it up; and if you're a bad boy, they simply say
‘no’ and you try to pull some money out and nothing comes out until you go back
to being a good citizen, under their authorisation of citizenship. Here's the BBC
rehashing the same thing, talking about the fact they're putting these things
out etc:

Just half of the cards meant for non-EU nationals were issued in the
scheme's initial months, it has also emerged.

Then they go on and
on about the fact that they started off with foreign nationals, they probably
started with welfare folk as well, because they always do that, people who
can't speak up for themselves, 'who cares?' - that's the attitude that people
have. Then they go up into the general population and once we're used to the
idea. You see: it's ideas that the public must be trained to get used to,
that's all it is, just ideas. And I'm going to put a list of sites up, at least
the links for them, tonight, to do with the pin ID cards and you can look them
up for yourself for the ones for the UK and the US especially, because there's
a stack of them going on, in fact there's a group, it says:

511 Observes 30 Day Vigil Over Fusion Center Identity

The 5-11 Campaign, a grassroots privacy organization opposed to the
federal ID, declared 30 days of vigilance over identity legislation with
connections to Information Analysis Centers (IAC), or what is now commonly
known as Fusion Centers.

"Fusion
Centers", you see? This is in the US.

Based on reports that fusion centers are targeting 3rd party voters and
those who pose Constitutional challenges to the Department of Homeland
Security’s intelligence gathering efforts, we are aggressively opposing any
legislation that would secure our private information for national to
international data aggregation. This may include voter ID.

Etc, etc, etc.
There's a whole bunch of links, at the end of this article, which I'll also
give you a link to; and you can look them over for yourself. Some organisations
tried to fight it in the US and you should maybe get in touch with them and get
your voice out there, because it's coming, it's coming. This is a world-wide
campaign, to get us all into the global grid, where we're just numbers; and
under the world global authority or government (or governance as they may call
it) we'll all be called to answer for our petty crimes one day, we'll all get
our turn for being rehabilitated in the system.

Getting back again
to the use of drugs, drugging the population: I've always said, you know, the
big Pharma companies are part really of the Military-Industrial Complex, the
same as all the big high-tech industries are part of the Military-Industrial
Complex. People don't realise that warfare takes many forms and there's nothing
new whatsoever in using chemicals on populations during warfare, when you
realise the populations of the world are the problem, according to those who
know better, you know, the elites, those intelligent ones. We're the problem,
then of course they would use drugs on the population; and that's why Huxley
and others advocated drugging everybody. Huxley said “Most people are unhappy
anyway, what's wrong with making them happy with drugs?” But of course they
mean authorised ones and these drugs are specifically meant to target specific
areas of the brain. Also, remember: with the eugenics programmes, and it was
written a lot about by Margaret Sager and others, who are hailed today as
heroes, that they'd have to get rid of those with bad genes and those with
emotional disturbances were classified as having bad genes. Here's an article,
another one from the BBC that ties right in with this, it's all a big accident
of course, but it says, from 7th of April 2009:

'Sedation link' to birth defects

Hundreds of girls heavily sedated in UK care homes during the 1970s and
1980s may be at risk of having children with birth defects, the BBC has
found.

The BBC has found
it, really? Is that what the BBC is supposed to do, they're supposed to find?
The governments know this stuff, they have all the data on it, so did the
scientists that authorised all this, so did the Pharma companies, before they
issued the drugs. It says:

Radio 4's Today found 10 ex-residents of a children's home run by the
Church of England in Gravesend, Kent, have had children with a birth
defect.

This is only one of
them, this is only one place, there's stacks of these, all over the UK and the
world. Britain is exactly the same. It says:

They were given massive doses of tranquilisers and other drugs while
being restrained as teenagers. The Diocese of Rochester says it will co-operate
with any future inquiry.

One childcare expert said hundreds of children may have been drugged in
the care system across the UK throughout the 70s and 80s,

Well, they did it
across Canada too, across Europe and across the US; they're still doing
it.

potentially subjecting them to the same health risks as those learnt
about by the BBC... "Using drugs to control the behaviour of children was
perfectly acceptable as far as their own professional understanding at that
time went."

It hasn't changed,
what they've found out here, it says, that many of the children these young
women eventually had, have massive birth defects and they all had respiratory
problems, that's common, they have learning difficulties. Some of them are born
blind and many of them were cleft palates and micrognathia, which is a
receding lower jaw. And these drugs, by the way, are still being used commonly
today, not just in homes, but across general society. So, I'll put that link up
as well and you can read it up for yourself.

Another interesting
thing too is that as we amalgamate the planet, and we've all seen articles,
most articles, even this one here, is a form of predictive programming. We get
taught: you train animals, step-by-step, to your intended target. If a dog's
there to go a certain place or up a ladder, you train him by putting the ladder
near him, first of all, don't make him walk on it, put it on the ground and so
on and so on; and then gradually put it up a little slope and up, up and up.
They train us the same way, so these articles are to get us to accept the first
step; then, they give us the second step, the third, the fourth, the fifth and
suddenly, we're in the cage.

The US, we know and
Canada and Mexico have already made overtures to amalgamate part of their army,
in fact, it's really kind of done, special units have already been formed and
they're working together, have been for years in fact. Here's Britain,
basically, the head of Britain, for the Forces, saying they're amalgamating
with Europe, they're all at their disposal for the European Army. That's from
the Mail Online April the 7th 2009, and it says here:

Now all of our Armed Forces are on offer as part of an EU 'catalogue'

Britain is willing to provide all our Armed Forces to fight under the EU
flag in future wars, a minister has revealed. Europe Minister Caroline
Flint

This is the woman
who helped ram through the EU Constitution and hadn't read it.

said that every operational unit of the British Army, the Royal Navy and
RAF will be on offer as part of an EU 'force catalogue'.

It's called an EU
"force catalogue". So, everything's amalgamating across the world,
this is incredible coordination, we’ve got to understand: these guys who meet
at the G20 don't plan anything, the bureaucrats do it all in advance for them,
they just go there and sign and have great big meals. It takes years to get all
this kind of thing in play, the groundwork set up, negotiations and then
agreement after agreement signed, sealed and delivered. Then, the
infrastructure's set up for it to work. This is only one part of it, of the
whole of the Globalisation agenda. Every country is like a mirror image of the
other countries, with their anti-terrorism, their amalgamations, public-private
partnerships, data collection and banks insuring them. See, we are already
global; and the fact is, you see, this war has been on the public for hundreds
of years and they didn't know. Gradualism, gradualism and one agenda only; an
agenda that knocks out all competition, all competition. An agenda that
pretends it's so liberal it'll stand up for every group - until its usefulness
is over - and then it goes on to the next target and the next target and the next
target. Now, you're all under authoritarian governments, very-very simple,
Fabian, very Fabian.

Now, I'll go to the
callers, because there are some callers on the line here and see what they've
got to say. There's Aran from Pennsylvania, are you there Aran?

Arran: Yes, hi
Alan, how you doin' tonight?

Alan: I'm hanging
in here, as usual.

Aran: Thanks for
taking my call. It's funny you know, Gordon Brown's calling for a New World
Order last weekend; and you know, I go to work and I hear people's conversations
and nobody talks about it.

Alan: No!

Aran: I was at work
the other day and I was listening to the Alex Jones show and they were talking
about that and I turned off my player and I hear guys over in the corner
talking about movies they just watched and they were just laughing, having a
good time, not even really being concerned with any of this; and I find it
difficult to have conversations with these people as you know you start to wake
up.

Alan: Yes. Well,
that's the difference, you see, when you're awake, it can be terrifying for
some people, I know that, they tell me, to be amongst people who obviously have
something wrong with them, but what you're seeing are the casualties of
incredible warfare. Any creature that is not cognisant of its environment and
changes within its environment within its environment that will affect it is
technically doomed; and what you're seeing is the fall-out of intense
indoctrination and psychology and the use of incredible media and entertainment
on their minds, to reduce to them to the state they're in. They have no idea
and they have no care, they truly are domesticated to the extent that they
can't recognise danger when it's around them.

Aran: You're right,
I try to tell them about it and they just don't want to listen, or they laugh
at you, you know.

Alan: That's right.
Even cattle, I lived next to a farm at one time and the cattle, that are called
domesticated animals; they've been so inbred that they create a specific
domesticity in them. Even the night before they were carted off to the
slaughter house, and there were no signs of it happening, the trucks hadn't
arrived, they'd be making one heck of a noise, all night long. They sense
something; but humans don't, most humans don't even have that left in them
anymore.

Aran: It's gone and
another thing is with these kids; my niece, I just found out she got the HPV
shot and she's only 11 years old; 11 years old and they’re getting these shots
already.

Alan: That's
right.

Aran: That's
ridiculous.

Alan: Eventually,
once it becomes common place, they'll get it much-much younger, this is just to
introduce the idea and again, we're trained step-by-step and once we've done it
long enough, it's no big deal to have them get the shot when they're two or something.

Aran: That's crazy.
I want to say, I really enjoy your show and I really like hearing your blurbs,
do you do those anymore?

Alan: Once in a
blue moon, when I get time, I can do that. Most people think I just come on the
air and do an hour here, but really, my whole day is tied with other things
too. Even to do with this and answering emails and running off to the store, or
whatever, there's things you got to do; so just this alone takes so much of my
time up, it's amazing. Then you're uploading until maybe 01:00 in the morning,
02:00 in the morning, to the sites.

Aran: OK, so, one
more question. I was reading on your website the question and answer thing and
one question talks about the three monks that set themselves on fire in the
Vietnam era; and your answer: the last sentence says "Only those who know
(as opposed to believe) have no fear of casting off the physical body". Do
these monks; were they able to project their consciousness outside their body
while they were still alive through the meditating?

Alan: There are
techniques, there's no doubt, and we know about them, they've been demonstrated
many times. There are techniques to literally avoid all pain whatsoever; and
there was one guy from India that was a leader of the Hindu community, politically,
in fact, and he had cancer of the throat and he could actually put himself in a
state where the pain would literally leave him altogether, for long periods of
time. So, it's possible for them to do that, it's really a mind over matter
thing; but, again, too: there are also people who come to the stage of
realising that life itself, what is life? Is life slavery? Are there really
happy slaves? If you're not a happy slave, what do you have to lose? And of
course, that's what governments are terrified of now, when they talk about
suicide bombers; suicide bombers, generally, are people who have been throwing
stones for years against tanks and who have nothing to lose, you know. In other
words: what's your value of life to yourself? is the big question each one of
these people will come to, including the monks that set fire to
themselves.

Aran: Well, thanks
a lot Alan, I appreciate it.

Alan: Thanks for
calling.

Aran: Have a good
night.

Alan: And there's
Tim from Indiana, are you there Tim? Hello?

Tim: Hey, hello.
Hey, how you doin' man?

Alan: Not
bad.

Tim: I was just
going to comment on almost what you were talking about with changes in your
environment. Me and my buddy at work, we actually talk a lot about like real
things; so, it's kind of nice to have somebody to really talk to. Anyway, about
five years ago, where I live at, I work in Kentucky, one of the biggest cities
in Kentucky. And about five years ago, the city had put these steel barriers up
and they put them all throughout the city and they said they would use them to
protect people from crossing over the median, if there was an accident. Anyway,
long story short, where I work at is on the outskirts of town and I noticed
that all over the city, supposedly where they were going put these things, they
only put them on the outskirts of the city. So, about two months ago, there was
like two big barriers on the outskirts and I'm thinking like 'wait a minute,
what's this about?' Then I had a eureka moment: they're actually building barriers
in case they shut the city down.

Alan: I'll tell
you, hold on, we'll come back on this, because I know quite a bit about
this!

Tim: OK.

Alan: I'll get you
- after this break.

=== BREAK ===

I'm Alan Watt and
this is Cutting Through The Matrix and we're talking to Tim from Indiana, about
the big barriers that are going across alongside highways and roads, in the US
and Canada, in fact; and they have been doing this since around 2000-2001, they
sped it up, even on rural routes. Of course, the idea is, eventually, when any
catastrophe, or any crisis, or even if a whole area is ordered to move or
evacuate, they'll have you going one way only and you can't get off the road.
Part of that was discussed back in the '70s and '80s, when they said that the
people with SUVs would be a problem, because they might try and get off the
roads and go cross country, when they saw that there was danger on the road
that they were taking / being forced to take. That was part of the push of
getting SUVs off the road, believe it or not; that's what was really behind
that. Hello Tim, are you still there?

Tim: I’m still
here.

Alan: Go ahead.

Tim: It's funny you
say that because we were talking about that movie ‘I am Legend’, where they
kind of like block off the city. So, during this eureka moment I had, it was
like you know what, if that happened to me, or whatever, maybe I could get
people together like hey, let's all get our cars together and like push these
things down, then go; and then, my buddy said if you do that they said that
they would shoot people if you try to do it and if there's too many people
doing it they would probably bomb us, I said I guess you got a point. So, we
had a good conversation about that; but it's kind of messed up though because
like, looking at it, you're like if they really did this, then you really are
trapped and it sucks because it's like, you know, what do you do?

Alan: Yes, and
they'll have the armed helicopters overhead and all that.

Tim: Alright, well
that's all I have man, so I'll let somebody else get in.

Alan: Thanks for
calling.

They've thought of
everything you see, they've been making their plans and their war games for
many-many years and now we're seeing the stuff implemented. Before 2001
happened, in fact, if you go along major highways, you'll find, in Canada and
the States, where you have intersections, there's often holes at this very site
near the barriers. That's for the big gateposts that they're going to put in,
the collapsible gates that they can just stick in those pre-existing sockets
and unfurl right across the road. This was planned years before 9/11.

And there's Sheldon
from Arizona, are you there Sheldon? Hello?

Sheldon: Hello. Hi
Alan, first time caller, I think you're a very-very sharp researcher and really
polite individual and I just heard you talking about 9/11, which was exactly
what I wanted to ask you. Have you had the chance to check out the research Dr.
Judy Wood has done on the 9/11?

Alan: No.

Sheldon: Well, she
says that - she's a highly credentialed scientist out of South Carolina - her
information is that a hurricane was headed towards New York City on the morning
of 9/11 and that directed energy weapons brought the towers down and she's got
all these photos of these cars that instantly turned to rust, after the towers
disappeared. What are your thoughts on that?

Alan: No, I don't
believe it at all. I think there was so many, again, Psy-ops programmes that
went into effect after that to discredit the original exposés of 9/11. The BBC
had the head of MI6 on, right after, in fact the day of 9/11, the Mossad had a
spokesman on the day, saying that they'd warned, weeks before, the US
Government what was going to happen on that particular date and it did happen.
Planes definitely went into those buildings, at the top anyway (the Pentagon is
a different matter) but definitely the towers; it was planes that hit those two
towers. Now, whether the guys were actually on it that they said is up in the
air because even the CBC documentaries in Canada, talked to different people,
who were supposedly on the planes that day, who were still in their original
countries, and one of them was a taxi driver. So, I don't know where the CIA
got their faces from, but planes certainly went into the towers to start off.
This was a must-be operation and a lot of fantastic stuff came out afterwards,
trying to discredit or create what they called conspiracy theorists, so anyone
talking about the agenda is lumped in as a conspiracy theorist, so the more
bizarre and fantastic they can make it, the better. There's no doubt, to me,
and to pretty well everybody who's watched that and grown up watching
demolitions occasionally on television, that a demolition job was done, as they
came down like decks of cards. That was obvious.

Well, I hear the
music coming in and from Hamish and myself, Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight and
may your god or your gods go with you.