There are many strands to this case and everyone is entitled to his or her own point of view and I'm sure will present facts to back this up. To my mind the body bag is significant and indicates a premeditated crime, which rules out the random attack theory, though police were wrong to publicly declare the husband as their "prime and only suspect." The Rayneys were a power couple who outwardly had everything, though it's my belief Lloyd caught wind of his wife's affair and started to plan the murder from that point. I believe he knocked her out at home, placed her in the pre-arranged body bag, dumped her in King's Park and returned to the house on foot. He then played his part as the grieving husband, in control of his emotions at all times, so much so that police did not bring charges until three years afterwards. https://au.news.yahoo.com/corryn-rayneys-ex-boyfriend-reveals-intimate-relationship-34909860.html?guccounter=1

Amongst all the powerfull evidence against him, is the statement he made a month prior to passengers in his car, "there's a body going in there" Coupled with the sand found in his car, he could have readily dug the shallow grave prior to abducting his prey, and have the body bag ready.

If it hadn't of been for hijacking (Lacco's words) the deceased's car and, damaging the sump leaving a trail of oil, the body may never have been found.

Amongst all the powerfull evidence against him, is the statement he made a month prior to passengers in his car, "there's a body going in there" Coupled with the sand found in his car, he could have readily dug the shallow grave prior to abducting his prey, and have the body bag ready.

If it hadn't of been for hijacking (Lacco's words) the deceased's car and, damaging the sump leaving a trail of oil, the body may never have been found.

When couples go through a marriage break up the gloves are often off, using under hand tactics when it comes to dividing up the family assets. This doesn't make him a murderer.

I don't blame Rayney opting for a trial by Judge only, after the Police had publicly dragged his name through the dirt, there wouldn't have been an objective Jury. Also being of Indian extraction, he may have been subjected to having guilt assumed on him by possible Red Necks.

The Police may have been aware of him taping conversations with his wife, this erroneously fed into their narrative of him being the murderer despite the absence of any concrete evidence.

There's far more compelling evidence against Lacco and his cousin (partner in crime) especially with his cigarette butt being found on the Rayney's front lawn.

What are the odds of someone planning to kill his wife at the same time as 2 notorious sex offenders having compelling evidence of also committing the crime.

The only alternative explanation is if Rayney had some sort of inside knowledge that these 2 violent rapists were in the area and framed them. But then there are the incriminating maps found at Lacco's address.