The scope of Russia’s meddling in last year’s presidential election is only now starting to become clear. Representatives for Twitter, Facebook, and Google testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday and the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday about Russian interference on their platforms.

Here is a look at six sites created by a single Russian troll farm, a sliver of the 470 accounts made public so far. In all, the sites in question have been shared as many as 340 million times.

Examples of content

Facebook had declined to identify the fake Russian pages, but six sites have been publicly released and The Daily Beast and other news organizations found some of what the sites were propagating. The examples below are from just a few of the Russian troll farm sites.

Ed Russell, associate professor of advertising at the Newhouse School at Syracuse University, reacts to the Facebook ads bought by Russians in order to influence the 2016 election.

“The most important single thing in advertising is effectiveness. An ugly ad that works is better than the cleverest ad that may be wildly entertaining, but doesn’t work. These Russian ads look very amateurish, but we shouldn’t be fooled; they are likely very effective. Looking amateurish lends to the sincere credibility of topics like patriotism, religion and racism,” says Russell, who worked for 25 years in the advertising business for some of the largest and best known firms in the world.

“I’ve helped create product ads in Russia. They have a very professional and capable advertising industry. These ads are more sophisticated and manipulative playing to the divisions which exist in American political life. Looked at as a whole, it’s obvious the goal is to enflame prejudices and even incite violence. Why do they work? They reinforce belief systems, our prejudices and embolden us to stand our ground all while sowing discord throughout social media worse than your drunk uncle at Thanksgiving,” says Russell.

“It also works because America has produced a segment of the population ignorant enough to believe ‘Pizzagate’ might be a real thing. I have to believe Edgar Welch was a true believer to drive from North Carolina to Washington DC and be willing to risk his life over it,” says Russell.

“The saddest part of this story is how difficult it will be to actually control messaging from foreign powers in the future. Social media got caught with their pants down and senators were very angry at representatives from Twitter, Facebook and Google. The problem is they don’t know how to pull their pants up while respecting free speech of all Americans. This isn’t over. It probably never even slowed down,” says Russell.

Sites studied

As many as 126 million Americans were exposed to fake news stories, deceptive advertisements and other messages created by a Russian troll farm, according to research and estimates created by Jonathan Albright, a social media analyst from Columbia University.

The 470 accounts and pages linked to Russian propagandists also had about 3,000 ads seen by an an estimated 10 million users. But that’s just on Facebook. The Russian operatives had an estimated 2,752 fake Twitter accounts and 1,108 videos on 18 different Google channels.

Closed pages

This chart shows Albright’s research tracking user interaction with six closed Facebook pages created by the Russian troll farm in question: The sites offered false information about border security, police brutality and immigration.

Some of the six sites studied were created as early as July 2015.

Reacted to widely

The information was shared through social media and the number below shows the sum of reactions, comments and shares for the sites.

Engagement

A bubble graph shows each post by site and how much engagement (”likes,” comments, and “reactions”) they had.

The president and his campaign officials have denied colluding in any way with the Russians. A number of Russian-linked Facebook ads specifically targeted Michigan and Wisconsin, two states crucial to Donald Trump’s victory last November. Michigan and Wisconsin went Trump by the smallest margins in the election.

Tight race

State and electoral votes:

Pennsylvania (20): Trump 48.8%, Clinton 47.6%

Michigan (16): Trump 47.6%, Clinton 47.3%

Wisconsin (10): Trump 47.9%, Clinton 46.9%

Florida (29): Trump 49.1%, Clinton 47.8%

Sources: U.S. News and World Report, Facebook, The Washington Post, Jonathan Albright, research director at Columbia University, The Daily Beast, the New York Times, Recode.net, The Associated Press, Gizmodo.com, Syracuse University

Kurt Snibbe is a visual journalist for Southern California News Group. Snibbe has won several medals in international graphics competitions and was a staff cartoonist for ESPN.com. Snibbe began with The Orange County Register in 1997, left in 2008 and returned in 2013.

Join the Conversation

We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.

If you see comments that you find offensive, please use the “Flag as Inappropriate” feature by hovering over the right side of the post, and pulling down on the arrow that appears. Or, contact our editors by emailing moderator@scng.com.