Post navigation

New York Times Calls for White Genocide

American white people whose ancestral roots go back generations in America should be deported. White people are pretty worthless, you see. They need to be removed from the country of their birth to make room for nonwhite immigrants.

Jewish journalist Bret Stephens drew Rebel Media’s Washington correspondent Jack Posbiec’s attention with an opinion piece that appeared in the New York Times and then was syndicated to other news outlets, such as Masslive, where I found it.

Jack calls it advocating white genocide. That may be a little too strong a characterization, but the op-ed is certainly hostile to the European-American. I’ve summarized it for you above, but here’s the entire hit piece.

In the matter of immigration, mark this conservative columnist down as strongly pro-deportation. The United States has too many people who don’t work hard, don’t believe in God, don’t contribute much to society and don’t appreciate the greatness of the American system.

They need to return whence they came.

I speak of Americans whose families have been in this country for a few generations. Complacent, entitled and often shockingly ignorant on basic points of American law and history, they are the stagnant pool in which our national prospects risk drowning.

DEPORT THEM.

On point after point, America’s nonimmigrants are failing our country. Crime? A study by the Cato Institute notes that nonimmigrants are incarcerated at nearly twice the rate of illegal immigrants, and at more than three times the rate of legal ones.

Educational achievement? Just 17 percent of the finalists in the 2016 Intel Science Talent Search – often called the “Junior Nobel Prize” – were the children of U.S.-born parents. At the Rochester Institute of Technology, just 9.5 percent of graduate students in electrical engineering were nonimmigrants.

Religious piety – especially of the Christian variety? More illegal immigrants identify as Christian (83 percent) than do Americans (70.6 percent), a fact right-wing immigration restrictionists might ponder as they bemoan declines in church attendance.

Business creation? Nonimmigrants start businesses at half the rate of immigrants, and accounted for fewer than half the companies started in Silicon Valley between 1995 and 2005. Overall, the share of nonimmigrant entrepreneurs fell by more than 10 percentage points between 1995 and 2008, according to a Harvard Business Review study.

Nor does the case against nonimmigrants end there. The rate of out-of-wedlock births for U.S.-born mothers exceeds the rate for foreign-born moms, 42 percent to 33 percent. The rate of delinquency and criminality among nonimmigrant teens considerably exceeds that of their immigrant peers. A recent report by the Sentencing Project also finds evidence that the fewer immigrants there are in a neighborhood, the likelier it is to be unsafe.

And then there’s the all-important issue of demographics. The race for the future is ultimately a race for people – healthy, working-age, fertile people – and our nonimmigrants fail us here, too. “The increase in the overall number of U.S. births, from 3.74 million in 1970 to 4.0 million in 2014, is due entirely to births to foreign-born mothers,” reports the Pew Research Center. Without these immigrant moms, the United States would be faced with the same demographic death spiral that now confronts Japan.

Bottom line: So-called real Americans are screwing up America. Maybe they should leave, so that we can replace them with new and better ones: newcomers who are more appreciative of what the United States has to offer, more ambitious for themselves and their children, and more willing to sacrifice for the future. In other words, just the kind of people we used to be – when “we” had just come off the boat.

OK, so I’m jesting about deporting “real Americans” en masse. (Who would take them in, anyway?) But then the threat of mass deportations has been no joke with this administration.

On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security seemed prepared to extend an Obama administration program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which allows the children of illegal immigrants – some 800,000 people in all – to continue to study and work in the United States. The decision would have reversed one of Donald Trump’s ugly campaign threats to deport these kids, whose only crime was to have been brought to the United States by their parents.

Yet the administration is still committed to deporting their parents, and on Friday the DHS announced that even DACA remains under review – another cruel twist for young immigrants wondering if they’ll be sent back to “home” countries they hardly ever knew, and whose language they might barely even speak.

Beyond the inhumanity of toying with people’s lives this way, there’s also the shortsightedness of it. We do not usually find happiness by driving away those who would love us. Businesses do not often prosper by firing their better employees and discouraging job applications. So how does America become great again by berating and evicting its most energetic, enterprising, law-abiding, job-creating, idea-generating, self-multiplying and God-fearing people?

Because I’m the child of immigrants and grew up abroad, I have always thought of the United States as a country that belongs first to its newcomers – the people who strain hardest to become a part of it because they realize that it’s precious; and who do the most to remake it so that our ideas, and our appeal, may stay fresh.

That used to be a cliche, but in the Age of Trump it needs to be explained all over again. We’re a country of immigrants – by and for them, too. Americans who don’t get it should get out.

Wiki confirms he’s a neocon anti-Trumper, & that… “His parents were both secular Jews. His paternal grandfather had changed the family surname from Ehrlich to Stephens (after poet James Stephens). He was raised in Mexico City, where his father was born and worked.” So no wonder he is anti-natural-Americans & is pro-immigration.

The HUGE “white elephant” that Stephens IGNORED in his derogatory article is that EVERYTHING he is complaining about (re NON-immigrant Americans) was brought about PRECISELY by (((THEM)))!

Yet he has he audacity to end his “opinion” with this:

“Because I’m the child of immigrants and grew up abroad, I have always thought of the United States as a country that belongs first to its newcomers — the people who strain hardest to become a part of it because they realize that it’s precious; and who do the most to remake it so that our ideas, and our appeal, may stay fresh.

“That used to be a cliché, but in the Age of Trump it needs to be explained all over again. We’re a country of immigrants — by and for them, too. Americans who don’t get it should get out.”

Um, NO. The USA is not a MOTEL where we have to “check out” after being here a few hundred years. We’re not going anywhere & how utterly arrogant of you to even suggest such a thing. Why don’t YOU get out & go back to “Mehico”?

Much of the data out there on ‘blacks’ has been skewed to be inclusive of Africans and Carribeans who have immigrated in recent decades. These are the model minority blacks that get into college etc under the umbrella term of black. The you tuber Reluctant Nabi speaks of this phenomenon of hiding African and Carribean blacks under the umbrella of black and how Kwan blacks are being displaced

“In the matter of immigration, mark this conservative columnist down as strongly pro-deportation. The United States has too many people who don’t work hard, don’t believe in God, don’t contribute much to society and don’t appreciate the greatness of the American system.

They need to return whence they came.

I speak of Americans whose families have been in this country for a few generations. Complacent, entitled and often shockingly ignorant on basic points of American law and history, they are the stagnant pool in which our national prospects risk drowning.

These people are the entitled lazy, parasitic Jews descended from the hoaxers who arrived from the 1930s to the 1950s.”

BTW any survey including US born niggers is going to be skewed towards no achievement, crime, and parasitism. He should have used statistics only about the white he hates vs the non whites who have arrived in say the last 30 years or so. My instinct is that the Jew author pulled all og his statistics out of his bum. I.e. they are phoney, false and fake news.

The Jew York Times should realise if whites are ethically cleansed by blacks with machetes in the future – his head will roll with all of his family. He is a white man whether he likes it or not, like all Ashkenazims. The killers will not pause to save all the lives of those with larger conks than average. Only skin colour will matter – as it should. Bring on the race war you wish for, Mr Jew, and you better realise which side you will be on.

That is not my point, which is that he will be killed by nigger machetes along with other white people. Thus he is on the wrong side. He can choose to be cut up if that is what he wants, no skin off my nose.
I have an idea that waking Jews up to the stupidity of their own actions might help. I.e. kill whites and you Jews will also be killed, as often happened in the (((Soviet Union))).
I cannot order the (((Rulers of the World)) to do anything even in their own best interests, but maybe reason might persuade (((them))).

Great post, Robert. I recognize this guy’s name from some other hit piece against whitey. It was bad enough that I saved the article, and I know it is somewhere in my archives. I will find it, but I really took offense to whatever this guy wrote. I knew he was a jew because I looked at his wiki info sometime back regarding to aforementioned article.

He got pretty ballsy with this piece, because the counterarguments you raise are exactly what will be used against jews in the future, to powerful effect, I hope. Your insights are superb. Please keep them coming. I don’t think I’ve yet to disagree with anything you’ve posted.

Be careful what you wish for bro. Sure immigrants start more businesses because many white businesses are family owned and stay in the family. Also, immigrants get fed backed loans and incentives. Silicon Valley is just an IT plantation with workers working 20 hours a day and spending oodles of money on drugs to be able to stay awake. These are excess men from India, Pakistan etc who are basically eunichsized and have no families so they can work oodles of hours that white men with families can’t.

If we all go back to Europe, it will rise and all those muzzles will get displaced yet again.

Absolutely stupid article. What bullshit is cranked out today in the name of scholarship

The data presented in this article is so skewed and Mr. Chosen shows how out of touch he is with reality. A lot of young people are forgoing college because they realize it is waste of time and $. Many white kids are opting for vocational apprenticeships etc.

Whatever

IT workers will be a dime a dozen in the next decade. Teachers right out of college make more money than IT stiffs.

(((They)), and those who are currently and complacently benefiting from the present anti-white/communist system, don’t realise just YET, that our people will not go into the night gently… This is the prevailing attitude we are suffering-from, every fucking day:

It is this belief that enables the likes of (((Bret Stephens,))) to crassly spit his venom on us like that, without any immediate consequences.

But the assaults keeps piling-up because, our people, are the most tolerant, and patient. In the roman empire times, we were equally believed to be disposed-of, “barbaric”, and in a de facto conquered state. Guess what happened to THAT empire.

Our people survived the entirety of an ice age, you think we won’t survive THIS assault? At that time, our population number might have gotten as low as a few hundred people, that was 195 thousand years ago;

WordPress automatically puts comments with two or more links into moderation. That’s to prevent advertising spammers from hitting a website with junk links. You can avoid the issue by just doing a separate comment for each link.

This is the same white hatred slobber that (((they))) published in Rhodesia in 1978 and South Africa in 1993. Odd that (((they))) never mention how it has resulted in a total cultural and economic disaster in those formerly white governed countries. One might be given to think that it is a deliberate (((act))) of omission.