The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.

The goal of all creditors is for consumers to repay borrowed money according to the terms and conditions of their original agreement. When a consumer debt fails to be repaid as agreed, creditors must decide the best option to take to recover their loss.

At this point, creditors have several options available. They may decide to use an internal or external collections department with the hopes of resolving the outstanding debt on a voluntary basis. Or they may choose to send the account to an attorney and seek a judgment against the consumer. Either way, while a debt remains unpaid, at some point the creditor must decide whether to proceed with legal action against the consumer. So during this evaluation process, creditors and/or debt collectors must determine if they feel a consumer is “suit-worthy.”

Here are the factors creditors and debt collectors use when determining whether to sue a consumer for an unpaid debt.

1. Where You Live

One of the first things that a creditor or debt collector looks for in a suit-worthy consumer is whether the consumer resides in a suit-worthy state. A suit-worthy state is one in which the laws are constructed to allow creditors to use methods such as wage garnishment, property liens and bank levies for involuntary repayment an unpaid debt.

In contrast, non-suit-worthy states do not allow one or any of these methods for involuntary repayment, thus leaving a creditor with an unenforceable judgment. Since the cost of legal proceedings are time-consuming and costly, creditors want to make sure they are taking the most efficient and cost-effective means possible and limiting lawsuits to those states that allow for enforceable judgments is one way of doing that.

2. Your Job Status

Once a creditor has identified the consumer lives in a state where judgments are enforceable through involuntary repayment such as wage garnishments, they begin to narrow down the accounts on which they’ll proceed with legal action. One of the first attributes they look for is whether the consumer is actively employed and receiving steady income. Employment is one of the single biggest deciding factors here. There are several methods of verifying employment — including validating the latest employment information the consumer has provided to the creditor, reviewing an updated credit report, or information obtained through the debt collection process.

Get Your Free Credit Score & Monitoring

3. Do You Own a Home?

Another factor used by creditors to determine suit-worthiness is whether or not the consumer owns a home. Sometimes homeownership itself is enough to justify filing for a judgment, but generally creditors look for built-up equity in the property. By utilizing a combination of credit reports and public property record databases, creditors are able to ascertain what, if any, equity is available in the property.

One of the main reasons creditors look for built-up equity before seeking a judgment, and ultimately a lien, on the property, is that by having a lien placed on the property, when a consumer goes to sell the property the built-up equity allows money to be left over from the sale which will then be applied to the unpaid debt before any proceeds go to the consumer.

4. Your Credit Report

A person’s credit report tells quite the story about their past, present and future financial narrative. The credit report is full of useful information for creditors when determining whether or not to file for a judgment. Creditors will look retrospectively for paid delinquent accounts in order to establish repayment patterns and look for trends such as: how long a consumer allowed accounts to go delinquent before resolving; if they paid delinquent debt while at a collection agency or before it went there; whether a judgment filing was needed to generate repayment.

They also look at current trends such as credit availability, recent paid accounts and trade line inquiries. Trade line inquiries are very helpful because they indicate what the consumer is attempting to do — such as getting a credit card, buying a car or even purchasing a home. So the credit report plays a very useful role in the determination process of filing for a judgment as well. You can spot changes by checking your free credit report summary on Credit.com. You can also get annual credit reports for free under federal law.

Regardless of what some may say — and what is crystal clear as it relates to legal action against consumers — is that creditors do not want to file for judgments against consumers to have a debt repaid. Creditors would always rather have the consumer pay back what is owed to them as agreed and when issues arise, creditors have and will always prefer to resolve matters on a voluntary basis. However, when voluntary measures prove unsuccessful, creditors are left with few options to recover the delinquent debt — and the main option is filing for a judgment. And when that does happen, creditors will tend to focus on those consumers from which they’re most likely to recover their money.

More on Managing Debt:

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Sign up for our Credit Report Card and receive the latest tips & advice from our team of 50+ credit and money experts as well as a FREE Credit Score and action plan. Sign up now.

Nick Jarman is the owner of RightAway, LLC, which provides coaching services focused on getting individuals from where they are to where they need to be. In addition to leadership development and coaching, Nick provides consulting services to the credit and collection industry with a focus on first and third party debt collectors, debt purchasers, and vendors. He has two decades of experience encompassing all facets of credit and collection operations including performance, compliance, business development, training, IT, analytics, and client experience. He served the last three years on the Board of Directors for ACA International and is the past President of the Missouri Collectors Association. He is adamant about leading by example and ensuring that every process is done the “right way.”

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

http://www.debtneutralitypetition.com/ DebtNEUTRALITYPetition.com

One of the economic scams of the ages. Credit Card companies claim their credit cards are “unsecured” therefore they must charge interest rates that are up to 400% higher than secured loans. But then the Credit Card companies can convert the “unsecured” loan into a secured loan via a court verdict. If an unsecured loan can be converted to a secured loan, than it was never really an unsecured loan to begin with.
Then to make the situation even more mind boggling, if the credit card company wins in court, they can file a lien on the debtors home on a debt that was allegedly unsecured in nature.
The bottom line is consumers have no debt suspension rights of any kind and as the U.S. economy expands to almost 50% being nothing more than financial services regurgitation, Millions upon millions of consumers are being unfairly treated by the financial terrorists who rule the roost.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.