We’re committed to delivering an unparalleled experience to all of our clients. All of our products are guaranteed for a generous 60 days from the date of your purchase. Should you have any questions, simply
contact us
and we’ll make things right.

New to false lashes?

Drag the slider to compare.

Let your eyes shine bright with this radiant pair of mink lashes, designed to make your eyes look bigger and lifted, with its winged out and criss-cross pattern. This pair is similar in shape to our Unforgettable, and similar in pattern to our Oh So Sweet, offering the best of both styles.

The ultimate in luxury, our mink lashes meticulously handcrafted with premium mink hairs, and a soft cotton band. Discover our collection of beautiful styles you can wear again and again, suitable for any occasion.

Glue Sold Separately.

Perfect lashes for my nights out, gives you a little more oopmh.

The lashes definitely feel very high-quality and are beautiful. Initially I was afraid that the lashes would be too long and overwhelming because I have monolid eyes that slightly protrude outward. However they ended up looking really natural with a little va-va-voom! I received a lot of compliments about my lashes from various people who couldn't tell that they were false lashes. I also love how there's a slight flair at the ends because it elongates my eyes. Definitely recommend!

Looks super natural on my monolid eyes

Another great Esqido natural, everyday option that opens up your eyes and is flexible enough to work for different eye shapes, including smaller, Asian, or hooded eyes. Trying to decide between Esqido Radiance and Unforgettable? >Radiance is a slightly longer than Unforgettable and has lashes that criss-cross/overlap rather than being straight lashes. >To me, Unforgettable looks a little more natural as my natural lashes don't cross.

Like every Esqido set, these are very durable yet comfortable. The lashes are beautiful, look natural and are perfectly constructed. I do prefer Unforgettable for length. Radiance seems a shade longer.

It seems ironic, but as digital audio continues to make leaps and bounds, we’re witnessing a simultaneous renaissance of analog gear. Now with the LIAISON, your analog gear can perform as nimbly as your digital plugins. the LIAISON brings the ease of programmable patches, hassle-free rerouting, plus the undeniable benefit of instant A/B comparisons, all in the analog environment. With the LIAISON you’ll unleash your creativity while keeping your studio primed for whatever tracking, mixing or mastering task comes your way.

Standard warranty: 90 days parts and labor, subject to inspection. Does not include damage incurred through abusive operation or modifications/attempted repair by unauthorized technicians.

There are no reviews yet.

Check out our LIAISON Reviews

Definitive Analog Summing + Color

Subtle, yet powerful tone changing.

Beyond Transparency

Beyond Transparency.

“I think of LIAISON not as an insert switcher, but as a creativity enabler.”

“Being able to switch devices from one bus to the other is extremely useful. The fast switching is amazing!”

“So happy with the LIAISON. Being able to switch gear in and out from the listening position without leaning over a patch bay is fantastic. After sitting in this chair for somany years, it actually improves my mixing ergonomics considerably.”

“The LIAISON is such a hip device. To be able to choose between different outboard gear immediately, and change the order of it in the signal path immediately is so useful!”

“One of the best features of the LIAISON is the monitor outs…you can monitor the signal at four points in the chain: before and after Bus A and B. The usefulness of this feature is huge, and Dangerous deserves major props for including it!”

Well now. As a speaker Ms. Clinton is paid, on average, $300,000 per talk; as a speaker I am paid, on average, $1,000 per talk. As a speaker, therefore, Ms. Clinton is paid 300 times more than I am paid! Is “something wrong”? Is the market for speakers rigged unfairly in favor of famous and politically connected speakers such as Ms. Clinton, and against obscure and ordinary speakers such as me? Is Ms. Clinton part of a nefarious network of greedy speaker-insiders who profit unjustly at the expense of myself and other more-typical speakers by manipulating the speaker market? Should government intervene into the speaker market to remedy this 300-to-1 ratio in speaker fees? Would the amounts that event organizers pay me to speak go up if government ensures that Ms. Clinton’s speaker fee is pushed down?

Clearly not.

Although I reject everything that Ms. Clinton stands for (and proclaims in her speeches!), I’m quite sure that her high fee accurately reflects the value to her audiences of having her speak, just as my modest fee accurately reflects my value as a public speaker. So unless Ms. Clinton is prepared to conclude, solely because her speaker pay is 300 times that of typical speakers, that she profits unjustly at my and othertypical speakers’ expense, she has no basis for asserting that a 300-to-1 differencein pay in other industries and lines of work is “wrong.”

Sincerely, Donald J. Boudreaux Professor of Economics and Martha and Nelson Getchell Chair for the Study of Free Market Capitalism at the Mercatus Center George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030