1. It's simple and free.
2. Your username cannot be used by guests.
3. You can personalise your profile picture.
4. Comments remain editable for 5 mins after submitting.
5. There are no captchas when you submit a comment.
6. You are informed of replies to your comments.
7. Your comments are archived for future reference.

Will there be WW3 with Russia? Suspense is killing me. Hillary might still get her wish come true.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(499 days ago)

I imagine that Trump wouldn't keep mentioning Russia if the media weren't so obsessed with projecting "Russia won the election for Trump" as a diversion from facing the realty that they are fast becoming History

I imagine that Trump wouldn't keep mentioning Russia if the media weren't so obsessed with projecting "Russia won the election for Trump" as a diversion from facing the realty that they are fast becoming History

Have the media been obsessed with Russian " hacking " , whilst totally ignoring the contents of those emails that's supposed to have swung the election over the last couple of weeks ?

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(498 days ago)

Conservatard status confirmed... more apologetics for Russian hacking and puny US security. So long as commie hacking reveals things we want to know, we don't mind right? So long as they swing the election in favor of who we want to win, fine! Yeah 'Murica! Played like a banjo by Putin and in denial!

Conservatard status confirmed... more apologetics for Russian hacking and puny US security. So long as commie hacking reveals things we want to know, we don't mind right? So long as they swing the election in favor of who we want to win, fine! Yeah 'Murica! Played like a banjo by Putin and in denial!

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(498 days ago)

Actually, the FBI released another tranche of the emails on Sunday. Apparently she was sending confidential and classified information to an unidentified 3rd party. This was being intercepted by unfriendly powers including Russia, and China and friendly powers like Israel. Not so much hacked as handed to on a plate.

Actually, the FBI released another tranche of the emails on Sunday. Apparently she was sending confidential and classified information to an unidentified 3rd party. This was being intercepted by unfriendly powers including Russia, and China and friendly powers like Israel. Not so much hacked as handed to on a plate.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(498 days ago)

Is this the same FBI that just days ago you were saying should not be trusted because they claimed Saddam had WOMD? The same FBI that still contradicts Trump when he says it wasn't Russia?

Well, if you respect the FBI, you can view the exact information from them ( LINK ).

Could you tell me which part of the documents specifies that the emails had been intercepted by Israel? I can find no mention of Israel at all in Sunday's batch.

Could you tell me which part of the documents specifies she was "sending confidential and classified information to an unidentified 3rd party."

The document actually specifies that " hostile foreign actors successfully gained access to... emails sent to or received by Clinton on her personal account" which seems to conflict with what you've told me.

I look forward to reading your references. Call me a pedant but I do like to fact-check.

Is this the same FBI that just days ago you were saying should not be trusted because they claimed Saddam had WOMD? The same FBI that still contradicts Trump when he says it wasn't Russia?

Well, if you respect the FBI, you can view the exact information from them ( LINK ).

Could you tell me which part of the documents specifies that the emails had been intercepted by Israel? I can find no mention of Israel at all in Sunday's batch.

Could you tell me which part of the documents specifies she was "sending confidential and classified information to an unidentified 3rd party."

The document actually specifies that " hostile foreign actors successfully gained access to... emails sent to or received by Clinton on her personal account" which seems to conflict with what you've told me.

I look forward to reading your references. Call me a pedant but I do like to fact-check.

Yeh because in postruth conservatarding you can stick the word apparently in front of any load of bullshite and it means you dont have to provide evidence. If its good enough for a conservatard to beleive its good enough for every one.

Yeh because in postruth conservatarding you can stick the word apparently in front of any load of bullshite and it means you dont have to provide evidence. If its good enough for a conservatard to beleive its good enough for every one.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

All this abuse from a libtarded moron too stoopid to check the FBI site.

Although I should add that if you are sending such info in such an unsecure way then why on earth do you not expect everyone to cash in. After all it is their job, even spying on your friends.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(498 days ago)

Apparently, you missed the two questions. Please tell me which part of the documents mentions Israel or an unidentified third party - and if not, why these things are 'apparent'. The documents are freely available so why wouldn't you fact-check?

Apparently, you are making excuses for Russia without checking the data.

Apparently, you missed the two questions. Please tell me which part of the documents mentions Israel or an unidentified third party - and if not, why these things are 'apparent'. The documents are freely available so why wouldn't you fact-check?

Apparently, you are making excuses for Russia without checking the data.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

There is 301 pages in the release on the FBI site. Read all the way through.

BWAHAHAHA!! cant find the page huh? hahahaa no further evidence your honor!! gee that must sting. conservatard been busted YET again! comes out with bullshit.. doesnt fact check.. gets called out straight away.. gets embarased and abusive. story of your life dumb ass.

BWAHAHAHA!! cant find the page huh? hahahaa no further evidence your honor!! gee that must sting. conservatard been busted YET again! comes out with bullshit.. doesnt fact check.. gets called out straight away.. gets embarased and abusive. story of your life dumb ass.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

Read the PDF its quite clear about the security implications of sending classified info to a journalist friend or having your maid fax it.

Read the PDF its quite clear about the security implications of sending classified info to a journalist friend or having your maid fax it.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(497 days ago)

but thats not your argument remember.. you said the pdf showed the info was being intercepted by israel and that stuff was being sent to an unidentified third party. unlike you i fact check stuff so yes i have read it. most of it is stuff to do with the investigation like demands for people to retain evidence. not very interesting. but there is NOTHING about israel at all. you swallowed that like the gullible fool you are and trotted it out without checking. well bad news i fact checked and found out you were wrong. nothing about israel... unless you can tell me the page number.

but thats not your argument remember.. you said the pdf showed the info was being intercepted by israel and that stuff was being sent to an unidentified third party. unlike you i fact check stuff so yes i have read it. most of it is stuff to do with the investigation like demands for people to retain evidence. not very interesting. but there is NOTHING about israel at all. you swallowed that like the gullible fool you are and trotted it out without checking. well bad news i fact checked and found out you were wrong. nothing about israel... unless you can tell me the page number.

HA. HA. HA.

live and learn conservatard.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

Read the PDF ya retard, it quite clearly states that it was open to anyone to access. Israel was just an example.of a friendly power. Goodness me libtards do clutch at straws, when beaten.

Read the PDF ya retard, it quite clearly states that it was open to anyone to access. Israel was just an example.of a friendly power. Goodness me libtards do clutch at straws, when beaten.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(496 days ago)

BWAHAHA oh GOD i missed that one!! you are pretending you BEAT us when you cant give us the page. HAHAHAHAAA thats cute!!!! shit you must be hurting real bad. got shown up again and now not even your puppet master has got your back. gee sometimes it must be real lonely being the conservatard. dont worry though. if at ANY time you wanna show me up and prove your point just give us that page number and i will state for the record that i was totaly wrong about you. HA. HA. HA. cry your self to sleep dumb ass.

BWAHAHA oh GOD i missed that one!! you are pretending you BEAT us when you cant give us the page. HAHAHAHAAA thats cute!!!! shit you must be hurting real bad. got shown up again and now not even your puppet master has got your back. gee sometimes it must be real lonely being the conservatard. dont worry though. if at ANY time you wanna show me up and prove your point just give us that page number and i will state for the record that i was totaly wrong about you. HA. HA. HA. cry your self to sleep dumb ass.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

What is it about libotomised morons that they can't smell what is being fed to them ?.

This year is going to be painful as the globalist dominoes topple one by one

Actually he didn't.what he actually said was that Russia is actively seeking to find ways into computer systems in the USA.

Not really different to every other country in the world. Everyone is spying and checking everybody else including us.

Only libtarded morons think that on Russia is doing this

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(497 days ago)

WRONG!!

I just watched it you dumbass. He said: "As far as hacking, I THINK IT WAS RUSSIA. But I also think we've been hacked by other countries". So IT (ie the hacking every one is talking about) WAS russia. HE HAS ADMITTED IT!!!!! but no shit the USA has been hacked in general by other countries, so what. What now conservatard? What do you beleive now? AHHAHAAHHAHA !!!!!!! BWAHAHAHAHHAHAA!!!!!!!!

I just watched it you dumbass. He said: "As far as hacking, I THINK IT WAS RUSSIA. But I also think we've been hacked by other countries". So IT (ie the hacking every one is talking about) WAS russia. HE HAS ADMITTED IT!!!!! but no shit the USA has been hacked in general by other countries, so what. What now conservatard? What do you beleive now? AHHAHAAHHAHA !!!!!!! BWAHAHAHAHHAHAA!!!!!!!!

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

Oh dear poor libtard is losing it.bigtime. Btw even the NYT is backing away from the Russia hacked the election story.

Oh dear poor libtard is losing it.bigtime. Btw even the NYT is backing away from the Russia hacked the election story.

Gee why bother when Hitlery hands it to everyone on a plate

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(497 days ago)

BWAHAHAHAHAHAA no defense but insults! Your puppet master has even admitted it himself out of his own mouth and the poor conservatard still denies it!!! he is so confused!!! hahahaaaaa this is fking HILARIOUS!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAA no defense but insults! Your puppet master has even admitted it himself out of his own mouth and the poor conservatard still denies it!!! he is so confused!!! hahahaaaaa this is fking HILARIOUS!!!!

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

Gee you're dumb.anyone would think that the Russians are so inept that they don't know how to anonymise themselves

Gee you're dumb.anyone would think that the Russians are so inept that they don't know how to anonymise themselves

Libtards are such dumb sheepie

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(497 days ago)

HAHA!! more insults, NO DEFENSE!! so it wasnt the russians?? so the fbi, the cia and your puppet master DJTRUMP are ALL WRONG!!! only MAD the original conservatard is right??? "as far as hacking I THINK IT WAS RUSSIA"!!! HAHAHAHAAA.

Oh this is pure GOLD this is fking hilarious. you get told what to think then they change there mind and you are lost!!! exposed once again as a gullible dumb ass who cant fact check HAHAHAHAHA.

and hey which page is the israel quote on? cos of course you have fact checked it?

HAHA!! more insults, NO DEFENSE!! so it wasnt the russians?? so the fbi, the cia and your puppet master DJTRUMP are ALL WRONG!!! only MAD the original conservatard is right??? "as far as hacking I THINK IT WAS RUSSIA"!!! HAHAHAHAAA.

Oh this is pure GOLD this is fking hilarious. you get told what to think then they change there mind and you are lost!!! exposed once again as a gullible dumb ass who cant fact check HAHAHAHAHA.

and hey which page is the israel quote on? cos of course you have fact checked it?

Do you realise that if you Google " libtard meltdown Russia " it comes up with the video above.

This is genuinely an bone fide example of how libtards feed their circle jerk

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(497 days ago)

HAHAHAHAAA oh sweet jesus thats actually the example of the EXACT opposite but your too dumb to see....listen...conservat ard googles a propaganda term like ""libtard meltdown"" rather than googling original info like the fbi emails. PRECISELY a circle jerk!!! bona fide. holy shit you trip yourself up so much you should just stay down. and another example.. you read your news paper with out fact checking and it says the emails say it was israel so you parrot it out trying to be smart, your little circle jerk again, but oh shit some one with a gram of common sense goes and checks thd emails and oh shit it turns out to be a load of bollocks!! no matter. post truth. just use the word apparently and stick in some more insults. hahahaaaa BOOM!! this hasnt been a good few days for you conservatard. your poor litle world has been blown to shit!

HAHAHAHAAA oh sweet jesus thats actually the example of the EXACT opposite but your too dumb to see....listen...conservat ard googles a propaganda term like ""libtard meltdown"" rather than googling original info like the fbi emails. PRECISELY a circle jerk!!! bona fide. holy shit you trip yourself up so much you should just stay down. and another example.. you read your news paper with out fact checking and it says the emails say it was israel so you parrot it out trying to be smart, your little circle jerk again, but oh shit some one with a gram of common sense goes and checks thd emails and oh shit it turns out to be a load of bollocks!! no matter. post truth. just use the word apparently and stick in some more insults. hahahaaaa BOOM!! this hasnt been a good few days for you conservatard. your poor litle world has been blown to shit!

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

Poor you . It's going to be a long 8 years of spitting your dummy every day. That's what happens when you're addicted to soras' lies

Poor you . It's going to be a long 8 years of spitting your dummy every day. That's what happens when you're addicted to soras' lies

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(497 days ago)

BWAHAHA 8 years IN YOUR DREAMS ! your puppet master is already having to eat his words. your too dumb to do that even when you have been contradicted by your own link. it must feel bad to be a puppet of trump who is himself a puppet of russia. desperatly lying about emails when it took me 10 mins to verify it. look dont have a tantrum every time some one exposes your gullibility. just learn to check sources your self and save us from doing it for you. your poor conservatard world is crumbling about your ears. i gotta say hearing trump admit it was russia was SO GREAT! hahahahaha go cry me a river conservatard

BWAHAHA 8 years IN YOUR DREAMS ! your puppet master is already having to eat his words. your too dumb to do that even when you have been contradicted by your own link. it must feel bad to be a puppet of trump who is himself a puppet of russia. desperatly lying about emails when it took me 10 mins to verify it. look dont have a tantrum every time some one exposes your gullibility. just learn to check sources your self and save us from doing it for you. your poor conservatard world is crumbling about your ears. i gotta say hearing trump admit it was russia was SO GREAT! hahahahaha go cry me a river conservatard

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

I don't know what you're taking but hearsay doesn't count. Maybe you should listen to what Trump actually said. Have fun libtard

"apparently" hearsay is fine... unless you can give me a page number for that israel lie that you beleived.

ok I will listen to trump more. he said yesterday "“As far as hacking, I think IT WAS RUSSIA"

HA HA HA conservatard doesnt know what to think any more. gee you must be a poor confused little moron right now! time to learn to fact check so you dont get yourself into this mess again... XD

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

All of the Russians hacking claims are hearsay. They haven't any proof. It's all just speculation..The only thing we know for certain is that any spotty kid could have hacked the DNC, and Podesta,, and Hitlery because there was no meaningful security.

All of the Russians hacking claims are hearsay. They haven't any proof. It's all just speculation..The only thing we know for certain is that any spotty kid could have hacked the DNC, and Podesta,, and Hitlery because there was no meaningful security.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Captain Colloquism(496 days ago)

So you think when the CIA, the FBI and the USA's chief security officers say the hacking in question was carried out by Russia, and probably sanctioned at the highest level, that is just hearsay? Tonight, even Trump's own choice for the head of CIA agreed that Russia had tried to effect the election... but no, just hearsay, right? Not enough for you, with your shrewd cynical mind.

Meanwhile, you think the claim that the hacking was Israel (which hasn't been mentioned at all in the original files), is well-grounded and is substantiated enough for you to repeat on here as if it's a fact?

By the by, I'm curious to see when you are going to give Guest the page number that backs up your claims. If you're interested, you don't even need to download the PDF to view it.

So you think when the CIA, the FBI and the USA's chief security officers say the hacking in question was carried out by Russia, and probably sanctioned at the highest level, that is just hearsay? Tonight, even Trump's own choice for the head of CIA agreed that Russia had tried to effect the election... but no, just hearsay, right? Not enough for you, with your shrewd cynical mind.

Meanwhile, you think the claim that the hacking was Israel (which hasn't been mentioned at all in the original files), is well-grounded and is substantiated enough for you to repeat on here as if it's a fact?

By the by, I'm curious to see when you are going to give Guest the page number that backs up your claims. If you're interested, you don't even need to download the PDF to view it.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

The FBI and CIA are part of the executive. Those security officers are politically aligned appointees of the sitting president.

All security reports come with caveats, the president can order a report on any subject

so we cannot trust the cia and fbi so the entire clinton email stuff must be total rubbish. am i right?

however we CAN trust mike pompeo the NEW head of cia because he was installed by trump himself. and pompeo said the report that blamed russia for the hacking was ""SOUND"&q uot;. am i right?

GOT IT?

BWAHAHAAAAAA oh boy this must be so confusing for your poor little conservatard brain!!! freaking brilliant!!

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

Let's say we have a political situation, which requires a scapegoat.

Lets also say we have a number of countries A to Z and independent agents a to Z which conduct naughty things in the night when no-one is looking. It's not unusual, all countries and agents do it to a certain degree, it's how the word turns.

But there has been a situation where this activity has got into the mainstream and we need a scapegoat.

Lets commission a hasty public report specifically into country R's nefarious activities , full off unsubstantiated rumours and no real meat, after all,we know that they have been up to no good, it's normal behaviour for most countries as we've noted above.

Lets also say we have a number of countries A to Z and independent agents a to Z which conduct naughty things in the night when no-one is looking. It's not unusual, all countries and agents do it to a certain degree, it's how the word turns.

But there has been a situation where this activity has got into the mainstream and we need a scapegoat.

Lets commission a hasty public report specifically into country R's nefarious activities , full off unsubstantiated rumours and no real meat, after all,we know that they have been up to no good, it's normal behaviour for most countries as we've noted above.

Let the rumour mill do its work on the dumb sheepie.

Mission accomplished.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(496 days ago)

lets say we have a situation that a foriegn power [historical enemy of the usa] MIGHT of acted ilegally to try and sway an american election. lets say that there is motive there. lets say that all the intelligence services.. all the homeland security services.. all the experts.. agree that country R was the source. ok so the dumb conservatard sheepie will be in denial with there heads in the sand. of course they dont want to admit it. there mastesr will say SURE the agencies will say that because they were HIRED by the democrat president. its a conspiracy.. lets run that in the conservatard papers. the gullible conservatards will buy that

mission acomplished.

woopsy.. the biggest conservatard cruz admits it was russia.. then lets say that trump himself ends up admitting "I think it was Russia" and then lets say that the incoming chief of the CIA employed by the republicans and chosen by trump himself agrees that R was the source. what now? oh shit so much for a conspiracy HAHAHAHAAAAA. awwwwwwwkward.

what does a dyed in the wool conservatard do? more and more evidence against them. can they admit they were wrong? hell no. not in there mind set. instead they gotta claim that the intelligence services are "full of unsubstantiated rumours". all of them.. now even the trump ones.. now even the republicans. pompeo and cruz are just rino sheepie too. after all, conservatards know more than homeland security and republican chiefs of cia etc. but what about the clinton email stuff? isnt that all part of the investigation by intelligence services? didnt they just decide they are full of rumors and cant be trusted? oh shit again. HAHAHAAA

lets say we have a situation that a foriegn power [historical enemy of the usa] MIGHT of acted ilegally to try and sway an american election. lets say that there is motive there. lets say that all the intelligence services.. all the homeland security services.. all the experts.. agree that country R was the source. ok so the dumb conservatard sheepie will be in denial with there heads in the sand. of course they dont want to admit it. there mastesr will say SURE the agencies will say that because they were HIRED by the democrat president. its a conspiracy.. lets run that in the conservatard papers. the gullible conservatards will buy that

mission acomplished.

woopsy.. the biggest conservatard cruz admits it was russia.. then lets say that trump himself ends up admitting "I think it was Russia" and then lets say that the incoming chief of the CIA employed by the republicans and chosen by trump himself agrees that R was the source. what now? oh shit so much for a conspiracy HAHAHAHAAAAA. awwwwwwwkward.

what does a dyed in the wool conservatard do? more and more evidence against them. can they admit they were wrong? hell no. not in there mind set. instead they gotta claim that the intelligence services are "full of unsubstantiated rumours". all of them.. now even the trump ones.. now even the republicans. pompeo and cruz are just rino sheepie too. after all, conservatards know more than homeland security and republican chiefs of cia etc. but what about the clinton email stuff? isnt that all part of the investigation by intelligence services? didnt they just decide they are full of rumors and cant be trusted? oh shit again. HAHAHAAA

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

Poor pig ignorant libtard. So much to learn about life. A good start would be to watch Yes (Prime) Minister from start to finish. Political manipulation by "Official" report is as old as the hills

Poor pig ignorant libtard. So much to learn about life. A good start would be to watch Yes (Prime) Minister from start to finish. Political manipulation by "Official" report is as old as the hills

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(496 days ago)

HAHAHA in other words... i have nothing to say about any one of your points. i cant answer a single argument. i cant back up my own argument. i cant explain why its ok to beleive the fbi on some stuff but not others. i cant explain why i still think its a conspiracy against trump even when his own cia chief says the same. but i do know some insults and i will tell you watch a shitty sitcom because thats about as political as i can get. yeh i know about life!!! BWAHAHAHAAA nice one!!! holy shit you are one dumb conservatard.

HAHAHA in other words... i have nothing to say about any one of your points. i cant answer a single argument. i cant back up my own argument. i cant explain why its ok to beleive the fbi on some stuff but not others. i cant explain why i still think its a conspiracy against trump even when his own cia chief says the same. but i do know some insults and i will tell you watch a shitty sitcom because thats about as political as i can get. yeh i know about life!!! BWAHAHAHAAA nice one!!! holy shit you are one dumb conservatard.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

Well I think everyone knows that you won't get it.

Everyone else however fully understands that if it is such an obvious threat then Obummer has had 8 years to get to grips with "Russian hacking".

every one? like walterego? like thebob? like captain coloqusiM? like any one of the people that regularly hand your ass to you?. who are you trying to kid conservatard. oh i SEE!! you can explain its just you dont want to because its so complicated i wont get it !!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH i love this shit. it gets to a point when we can see you know you been called out HAHA

total logic fail as usual. i know this week has been hard for you but grow a pair!! maybe if you spent more time looking up sources and thinking about having consistent views instead of watching scripted tv shows you would understand more politics. oh never mind. go back to your tv.

every one? like walterego? like thebob? like captain coloqusiM? like any one of the people that regularly hand your ass to you?. who are you trying to kid conservatard. oh i SEE!! you can explain its just you dont want to because its so complicated i wont get it !!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH i love this shit. it gets to a point when we can see you know you been called out HAHA

total logic fail as usual. i know this week has been hard for you but grow a pair!! maybe if you spent more time looking up sources and thinking about having consistent views instead of watching scripted tv shows you would understand more politics. oh never mind. go back to your tv.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(496 days ago)

Everyone with a brain. There are always a few deluded souls who get fooled all of the time, I call them libtards.

Everyone with a brain. There are always a few deluded souls who get fooled all of the time, I call them libtards.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(496 days ago)

Latest comment:

HAHA you even disagree with your puppet master and the people he has chosen. are they libtards too? ooh is that question too twicky for you? at some point you gotta realise that either every one else in the world is a libtard or its just you... the gullible conservatard who has been left high and dry by his masters.. they have been forced to change there minds due to the evidence. if you had the intellect to follow an argument you would realise that you should of changed your mind too. but then you wouldnt be the dumbest conservatard we all know and love would you.

HAHA you even disagree with your puppet master and the people he has chosen. are they libtards too? ooh is that question too twicky for you? at some point you gotta realise that either every one else in the world is a libtard or its just you... the gullible conservatard who has been left high and dry by his masters.. they have been forced to change there minds due to the evidence. if you had the intellect to follow an argument you would realise that you should of changed your mind too. but then you wouldnt be the dumbest conservatard we all know and love would you.

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
(496 days ago)

what you mean is YOU dont have any proof cos you never look for it. you just gotta learn to read pdfs and listen to people who are experts rather than swallowing stuff your puppet master tells you.. specially when he himself changes his mind a few days later!!! get with the times conservatard. you were wrong. man up and deal with it

what you mean is YOU dont have any proof cos you never look for it. you just gotta learn to read pdfs and listen to people who are experts rather than swallowing stuff your puppet master tells you.. specially when he himself changes his mind a few days later!!! get with the times conservatard. you were wrong. man up and deal with it

Add your reply

Submit as guest (your name)

Copy code

Submit as member (username / password)

CANCEL

Guest:
Facepalm(497 days ago)

And in other news a libtard senator from new Hampshire humiliated herself the other day by referring to a completely debunked and retracted story by the Washington post on " Russians hacked electrical supply in Vermont" during the Dept of homeland security confirmation hearings.

Yet another.classic example of libtard circle jerking getting in the way of real lite.

And in other news a libtard senator from new Hampshire humiliated herself the other day by referring to a completely debunked and retracted story by the Washington post on " Russians hacked electrical supply in Vermont" during the Dept of homeland security confirmation hearings.

Yet another.classic example of libtard circle jerking getting in the way of real lite.