No, having one dir is fine. Perhaps it should just be at $TOP/snd/?
-DS
johgibso at indiana.edu wrote:
> Well, I don't mind moving that directory into insts. I was careful
> to make the few files in samples_scores/snd small and mono, to cut
> down on space. I'd just like to make sure that we watch the space
> if more files go in there.
>> Or is there an advantage to having two separate snd dirs? Not sure
> I like that.
>> JG
>>>>>>From: Douglas Scott <netdscott at netscape.net>
>>>>Yes, but that is not a good directory path to use for insts/std/*/**.sco files.
>> We need something that has an easy relative path, like "../../snd/".
>>>>-DS
>>>>johgibso at indiana.edu wrote:
>>>>>>>Doug wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Could we create an insts/snd directory, put a few choice sounds into it, and
>>>>have ALL the sample scores in all the instrument directories refer to those
>>>>sounds? I HATE having to modify every processing inst sample score in order
>>>>to run it. People who did not want the extra space taken up would not have
>>>>to keep the files (or they could be a separate package).
>>>>>>>>Whaddya think, people?
>>>>>>>>>You mean like docs/sample_scores/snd/ ?
>>>>>>JG
>>>>> _______________________________________________
> RTcmix-discuss mailing list
>RTcmix-discuss at music.columbia.edu>http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/rtcmix-discuss