What Dropping the Cuba Trade Embargo Could Mean for U.S. Farmers

Farmers like the ones that plant these flooded rice fields in southeast Missouri see Cuba as a new market for their crop.

Kristofor Husted/Harvest Public Media

When President Obama announced in late 2014 that he would work toward ending the embargo on trade with Cuba, it wasn’t just tourists perking up their ears. Midwest farmers and ranchers see communist Cuba as an untapped market for goods from the American Heartland.

One of those farmers is Paul Combs, a rice farmer from southeast Missouri. Cuba can be an important market for farmers like Combs, who already depend on exporting their products.

Listen

Listening...

/

3:47

The radio story

“We’re excited about normalized relations with Cuba,” Combs said. “Until 1963, Cuba was the biggest market for U.S. rice.”

Rice farm owner Paul Combs says Cuba could be a large market not just for U.S. rice, but for other commodities as well.

Credit Kristofor Husted/Harvest Public Media

Combs says some of his rice ends up in milling operations stateside where it’s milled into rice flour and rice bran that you find on grocery store shelves. Anheuser-Busch snaps up some of Combs’ rice, too, for beer. The rest of the bins are loaded onto barges and shipped down the Mississippi River where they head out of the country.

“The primary markets for that export market are Mexico and then all of the countries in Central America,” Combs said.

Right now, Cuba imports tons of rice from Asia. Since Cuba sits smack dab in the middle of a busy U.S. trade route, American farmers think they can supply higher quality rice at a cheaper price than what Cubans are currently buying from Vietnam. And cheap is the name of the game for an island with a big import market.

“They’re a small country but they’re having to import 60 percent of their food requirements to feed the population,” said Bill Messina, an agriculture economist at the University of Florida.

In 2014, Cuba imported more than $2 billion worth of food products – much of which is bought in bulk from countries in Asia or South America, Messina says. But Cuba doesn’t have a ton of space to store extra crops, which could be an incentive to buy American.

“Its secure and dry warehouse storage facilities make it much more difficult for them to be importing large volumes like that,” Messina said, as opposed to the “smaller volumes that they could purchase from the United States.”

The U.S. has been able to export a limited amount of food to Cuba under a deal President George W. Bush made, but many commodity groups are calling for a full end to the trade embargo and complete access to all of Cuba’s market. But that takes an act of Congress.

“We always are looking for opportunities – whether it’s in Asia or whether it’s 90 miles from our shore – to sell more beans, or rice, or corn, or pork, or poultry,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri.

McCaskill, a democrat, visited Cuba recently. She’s says the U.S. is the only country not openly trading with Cuba and it’s time to drop the embargo, which would not only help American producers, but Cuban citizens, too.

“The Castro government is using the American embargo as an excuse to the people of Cuba to explain their lack of prosperity,” she said. “It’s time we rip away that excuse.”

Rice farm owner Paul Combs said ramping up rice exports for Cuba would be a welcome change. He says it’s impossible to know if it will be as big of a market as it was in 1963, but ultimately, American rice could act as the gateway commodity for the rest of the agriculture industry.

“As time goes on if their economy improves because of increased tourism, then you start to sell them the higher priced agricultural products like beef from Missouri or pork from Missouri,” he said.

Indeed, the National Chicken Council, American Soybean Association and the US Cattlemen’s Association are among dozens of commodity groups pushing for an end to the embargo. They hope their products are next in line.

Related Content

Big farms are collecting taxpayer dollars that they haven’t necessarily earned by taking advantage of a loophole in government subsidy rules, according to regulators, members of Congress and the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

As you've probably heard, a well-respected group of World Health Organization scientists said glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's wildly popular Roundup herbicide and its generic cousins, is probably capable of causing cancer in humans.

Just over a year ago, Tracy Dethlefs learned she has stage 1 breast cancer. Since then, she estimates she has charted some 10,000 miles traveling from her farm near Loup City in central Nebraska to area hospitals for treatment. Every surgery, round of chemotherapy and radiation treatment was a road trip.

Until the federal health insurance marketplace opened in late 2013, farmers and ranchers were more likely to be uninsured than many other occupational groups. The Affordable Care Act changed that by requiring them to buy insurance. But it also gave them coverage options they didn't have before.

You’ve probably seen, but may not have noticed, labels on the meat at your grocery store that say something like “Born, Raised, & Harvest in the U.S.A.” or “Born and Raised in Canada, Slaughtered in the U.S.”

These country of origin labels, as they are known, are part of an ongoing international trade dispute that has swept up Midwest ranchers. And they may not be long for store shelves.