It's a joke from an old South Park episode. Season 2, Episode 11: "Rodger Ebert Should Lay Off The Fatty Foods." In this episodes, the boys visit a planetarium, and the director has a rare bone disease that prevents him from pronouncing the "t" in planetarium.

Just because a majority of people think something is right, that doesn't automatically make it so.

In this instance, it's pretty subjective. Some people like it, some don't. There's nothing wrong with liking it, and there's nothing wrong with not liking. It's this kind of debate that keeps the Bond community alive.

What I am saying it's that it's wrong to insinuate that all Bond fans like the film, because it simply isn't true. I was simply asking for that person to speak for themselves and not the rest of the community.

And if you're not aware of how some Bond fans don't like that movie, you're not qualified to make any statements about what others think about Bond movies either, my good chum.

The point here is that Bond fans have differing opinions about the movie. It's inaccurate to insinuate that all fans like it, because it isn't true. I'm sorry you think Bond fans that like OHMSS have a monopoly on being true fans of the Bond franchise, but you're mistaken.

It's brought up later in the game that Cerberus carefully and meticulously made efforts to make them not look like the bad guys that they were in the first Mass Effect, and catered Shepard's experience so that it would lower his/her guard. That's why they hired Joker to be the pilot, for example. Cerberus didn't change in Mass Effect 2, they just deceived you. And it makes sense considering how they acted in Mass Effect 1.

Sure it is, people from all over the world come here, and I'm not saying it shouldn't be that way. I'm just saying it's not a huge issue to see American topics constantly coming up on American websites, especially when a substantial majority of the community is American.

I'm not saying I have a problem with it, I think it's great that people from all over the world come to reddit. Think of it this way:

It would be like if an American went to a website ending in ".co.uk", and in a thread about "issues with the website", they said that there's too many British topics that come up.

Sorry, but it's not a "huge deal" to find American people talking about American things on American websites just like it's not an issue to find British people talking about British things on a British website, and it's slightly pretentious to assert otherwise. Especially when 60% of the people on reddit are from the United States.

Like I said its sad you live somewhere that you feel the need to own a gun.

You seem more concerned with feeling superior to me than you do in understanding my point of view. If that's not how you feel, then try addressing the argument I made instead of just repeating yourself.

Do you keep a welding torch on you in case you get stuck in an elevator without airflow? Do you keep a grenade in case you need to create cover to escape?

There's that straw man argument I mentioned earlier.

Imagine finding out there's a country where people are hyper scared of those situations and carry those things on them all the time, have a bucketload of created problems unique to their nation because of it, and say "I need it just in case" as their argument for

It's not about paranoia. I'm not sitting in the corner of my house rubbing my firearms down with gun oil expecting an axe murder to burst through my door at any given second. Like I said before, I live in a very safe area of the United States. I just use firearms for home protection for one simple reason: It gives me a distinct advantage in those one-in-a-million situations that I would really like to have. Other than that, I just like to take my guns target shooting. I don't even hunt or anything like that, I just use them to shoot at paper targets because I enjoy doing so.

why they can't be like all the other countries where people live just fine without doing that...

The problem in the U.S. isn't guns themselves, it's about the gun culture. Too many people treat them as if they were toys (which I don't, I give all guns the respect and careful treatment they require). Please keep in mind that not every American is a gun-toting crazed cowboy or a mass-murderer waiting to happen. It's an ignorant stereotype. Most gun owners in the US are responsible citizens, but we never make it to the news.

I don't feel I need a gun just to protect my home and my location has nothing to do with it. I live in a very safe town, actually. My mindset is "I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it." And no place in the world is immune to home intrusions. Odds vary from location to location, but don't fool yourself into thinking that you're immune to it.

Because, 'Murcia, if they force us to store our weapons properly then the next thing they'll be barging down our doors and taking all of our guns!

You should try to see it form the other perspective instead of making straw man arguments. One of the points of owning guns is for safety. If the firearm is in a place that can reached quickly, it's easier to defend your home. Someone invading your home with the intent of harming you isn't going to wait for you to open your gun safe so you can shoot them, and it's ludicrous to assert otherwise. Yes, in households with children, all firearms should either be secured or stashed somewhere in secret. And children should be educated about the dangers of firearms so they understand that they're not toys. But requiring all guns to be stored in a safe completely eliminates one of the main, if not the main, benefits of owning them.

Edit: And you may not believe it, but not everyone that owns firearms is a slack-jawed yokel. Many of us are responsible, normal citizens just like you.

I understand that he was a jerk centuries ago to the three little pigs and to red riding hood/ the grandma, but what the hell does that have to do with now?...How could there possibly be such a strong precedent set by this character that would justify their response/reaction to him?

Bigby has a darker past than that. Long ago after his mother died, he decided to make himself a lot stronger, and his method of doing so was to kill and eat fables. A LOT of them. It's the reason he's banned from ever setting foot in the Farm, even in the event of an emergency. There's still a lot of resentment from that time and the emotional scars that resulted aren't going to be healed with him helping the people of Fable Town once. It should also be noted that given what's in the game, it takes place even before the first issue of the Fables comic, and people still had a difficult time trusting him then too.

I mean, when you think about it, you can't really blame them for dismissing the warnings and even deserve a pat on the back for helping Sheperd as much as they did without firing him/her.

The Codex in the game makes it clear that the Reapers are considered a myth in the galaxy. It would be like if a high ranking government official went to the President of the United States and insisted that an army of Bigfoots were about to invade and wipe out all life on Earth, but he couldn't provide any proof. I would be dismissing that claim all day long too.