Islam, An Ideology of Murder Respected by Degenerates

Two attacks and one explosion in Catalonia last night, with deaths in Barcelona, Cambril, and Alcanar. There are at least 19 dead, and more than one hundred injured (including 17 French citizens in “urgence absolue”, that is extreme critical care). The attacks were claimed by the Islamist State. Apparently they were Moroccans. The next day, it was the turn of Finland.

A 18 year old “asylum seeking” Moroccan attempted to, and killed women. At least two Finnish women died, half a dozen others were stabbed. A few days later, it was the turn of Marseille, France, where a truck driver wounded and killed a number of people at bus stops. The cause of all this murdering, attempted and realized? The mythology of Fundamental Islam, or, more precisely, the respect it has enjoyed all too long, among civilized people.

My nephew has close “Muslim” friends. At my urging, over the years, he recently read some of the Qur’an. He told me that the first impression is that “le Coran a été écritpar un fou” (the Qur’an was written by a madman).

Here we have a book which wants to “throw people into the fire”, every other page (the Bible does this more rarely).

“Indeed, those who disbelieve in Our verses – We will drive them into a Fire. Every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted in Might and Wise.”

Well, F your verses, Mr. God! Hopefully, we will grow thick enough a skin, one of these days. Western politicians go around, wondering how come so many Muslims get “radicalized”. Maybe they don’t how to read? “Radical” means from the root. Here we show some of the roots of Islam, they are vicious, by normal, decent, human standards.

The Qur’an is not just full of lethal threats, but also of rather funny insults.

So you want to end “terrorism”? End the literal preaching of this kind of hateful, lethal garbage.

And, especially stop telling us that throwing a critical look at this sort of lethal garbage is “racist”. Because all you will do, in the end, is to tell normal people that they are “racist” (the sort of reaction which brought the election of Trump, let alone the rule of plutocratic fascist rule which preceded it).

In Tunisia, a woman inherits only half of what a man inherits, and a Tunisian woman can’t marry a non-Muslim. And supposedly Tunisia is NOT an Islamist Republic. The 90-year-old Tunisian president want to change this anti-equality laws, but he is isolated, hated by the Jihadists, young and furious. Change requires physical courage. The chief of Islam in Tunisia came forward to support the president: no doubt he is high on the Jihadists’ list.

The “antifa” rage at the KKK and Neonazis, who are nowhere in power. Why don’t the “antifa” not rage at theocratic fascism? Instead some of the loudest of the opposition to Trump is theocratic fascist. Consider Linda Sarsour, who called for a “Jihad” against Trump.

Why did most “Western” “intellectuals” embrace (the respect of) Islam?

Because they were trying to please those who have the oil. Hint: not just the Saudis. We are enjoying the “Great Bitter Lake” conspiracy. The Justice System followed: it gave right of asylum to Jihad criminals condemned to death in their own countries. That was confusing fascists and victims: laws which were made to accept genuine victims of fascism were turned into laws to protect the fascists themselves!

To fight Islam, in its fundamental version, one needs first to withdraw the respect it enjoys.

Withdrawing respect can, and should be, withdrawn to many infamous ideologies. This is the first step in fighting them. Know them, and then, when you know them well, and because you know them well, spite them.

Islam is a cult of death, and modern liberalism is a cult of death. It is only natural that they will be chummy. Ironically, modern conservatives are far closer to classical liberals than modern liberals are.

Indeed, the inversion of all old values is making some strange bed fellows… It’s pretty astounding that “conservatives” (supposing Trump conserves anything) are now occupying the space Democrats used to rule (“LABOR”).
“Modern Liberalism” is a euphemism for old fashion plutocratism.

Agreed. We are living in a world of 1984 – the Party controls the language, so it controls the minds as well. Linguistical confusion has resulted in confusion of thought, and the end result is the chaos we are witnessing today.

I once gave a lift to a lady hitchiking to the nearest prefecture. She was a professional with a job in France. Her husband, a guardsman in Bourguiba’s service, had been killed in the line of duty. After the funeral they took away her passport as they planned to marry her to some cousin.

She wrote to Bourguiba. His answer “ton passeport t’attend chez le préfet”.

There is a village (Sejnane) where women produce traditional pottery, “primitive” and very powerful. Some time ago a bunch of Islamists invaded the village, sword in hand. The women (and their men) fought fiercely and drove them off. When I look at some of their work, sitting on a shelf, I always feel something like pride.

Tunisian ladies are very proud and aware of their status. When I was there with my wife, abortion was still a crime in France, thanks to our own bunch of religious loons. And they’d playfully taunt my wife: “We’re freer than you!”

No way they’ll ever revert to the old ways.

…

The vagaries of Net trawling once led me to a “learned Islam savants” site with a bunch of Qoran quotes pertaining to the tortures reserved to female sinners in Hell. They read like a excerpt from Sade, without the humour and philosophy.

Thanks for this very instructive comment, Dominique! (Keep them coming, please!).
I was a bit surprised by your last remarks on breast torture. Indeed, I read the Qur’an more than once, and never came across it that I remember of. However, the Hadith is gigantic, and I read only a tiny fraction of that.

I also think that, for the time, and from what his child-bride Aisha said, and her behavior (as observed and in writing), The Prophet was not the cause of the ultra sexism in Islam. After all, it’s Uthman who had it written, and he approved of it. That’s also why he was killed. Aish stridently opposed him, and Ali, on the ground of violating Muhammad’s mental legacy.

Somewhat weird. How could this 2.5 power law, supposing it exists, would help to explain the Inquisition, Stalin, or Nazism? Let alone McCarthyism? These are just ideologies founded on erroneous, not to say vile, infamous, cruel and demented axioms. Such is human nature that such axioms come in handy to provide with a pretext to decrease human populations.

Now as far as Islam is concerned, the basic “holy” text is the Qur’an, which is full of calls to murder “non-believers”, homosexuals, apostates (those who are viewed as having rejected Islam), hypocrites (those who claim to be Muslims, but don’t really believe), those who insult Islam, The Prophet, Allah. Such quotes are found one page out of two in the average. I counted around 10,000 words of violence in a total of 83,000 words in the Qur’an.

Here is a sample: Surah 4, verse 56, this is the Muslim God allegedly speaking:

“Indeed, those who disbelieve in Our verses – We will drive them into a Fire. Every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted in Might and Wise.”

No need for any 2.5 power law. Raw will to power will suffice…

What do you think? Please join the debate! The simplest questions are often the deepest! Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required)(Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )