Monthly Archives: December 2018

Immigration to the First World is the most important political issue. It remains very high, for example, net UK immigration to June 2018 (the most up to date figures) shows net immigration to be 273,000. That is worrying enough but it does not tell anything like the full immigration story because 625,000 was the total number of immigrants, i.e., the number people who actually came to live here, the vast majority of whom were foreigners rather than British people returning after a period living abroad. This means the UK is undergoing a radical and rapid. transformation of the nature of its population if this scale of replacement of native British people continues. If it does 6 million or so immigrants would arrive in the UK over the next ten years.

What is happening to the UK is being replicated throughout the West. The rise of so-called populist movements (in reality simply native populations in the West acting out of desperation as they see their countries being threatened by immigrants ) arise from the scale of migration to the First World. As yet, with a few exceptions such a Hungary building a fence, little has been done by Western Governments, especially those of the largest countries, to stop or even severely reduce the flow of migrants from the third world.

What needs to be done is (1) change the public language about mass immigration to the West and identify it for what it is, invasion, and d(2) disabuse immigrants of the idea that they have any right to migrate to the West.

Brexit

The behaviour of the Remainers over the past year has been both sinister and contemptible. However, it was not unexpected, because once the Remainer Theresa May became PM and appointed a majority Remainer Cabinet the writing was on the wall, namely, that Remainers would do everything they could to subvert the referendum vote to leave the EU.

May’s demeanour has been much commented upon because despite engaging in persistent and obvious lying she has remained surreally calm. This is easily explained, she is achieving precisely what she set out to do, namely, sabotage Brexit.

May will probably see herself variously as St Theresa the Martyr and Agent May in enemy territory (the UK) carrying out OPERATION QUISLING on behalf of the EU.

What the behaviour of the Remainers has done is shatter utterly the idea that the UK is a functioning democracy. Rather, it is an elective oligarchy whereby the electorate are offered an opportunity every few years to choose between competing parts of the elite, an elite in the UK whose general political ideas are largely shared by the various competing parts of that elite.

It is no surprise that democracy is being thwarted. The German sociologist Robert Michels in the early years of the twentieth century developed what he called the Iron Law of Oligarchy.

Michels was particularly interested in the way that organisations such as social democratic parties and trade unions which purported to exist to promote the interests of the working class invariably ended up serving the interest of those who came to wield power in such bodies, whilst becoming progressively more authoritarian and bureaucratic.

But although Michels had a special interest in leftist organisations the Iron Law of Oligarchy is generally applicable to any organisation or even any informal social group. The historian of 18th Century English politics Lewis Namier estimated that Britain was ruled by a few hundred families when the population was less than 10 million. The depressing reality is that probably today Britain is effectively ruled by no more than a few thousand families today. Look at the mainstream media, the politicians and with great wealth and the same families pop up over and over again.

The long march through the institutions

The treacherous behaviour of the Remainers is an object lesson in how internationalist elites have become dominant in Western politics since 1945.

A German student leader of the 1960s Rudi Dutschke put forward the idea of the Long March Through the Institutions whereby societies were subverted from within by those of an internationalist bent who would patiently work to gain positions of power and influence. Eventually there would be sufficient of such people to change the policies of Western societies from national to internationalist ones. That point was reached in the UK at least 50 years ago and the politically correct stranglehold on our society is now in full flower.

The capture of Western societies by internationalists has allowed them to permit and even overtly encourage mass immigration of people from different cultures , denigrate their own societies, traduce the West and its native populations generally and introduce gradually the pernicious totalitarian creed of political correctness which has “anti-racism” (in reality anti-white racism) at its heart. The last brick in the politically correct building is the increasingly draconian treatment of anyone who refused to toe the politically correct line , treatment which is increasingly including the use of the criminal law and imprisonment.

The idea of the Long March through the institutions has several emotional appeals. First, it has the allure of a conspiracy, of being part of something both bigger than its individual members and something terribly important. The fact that it is a long term project does not matter because each individual member of the conspiracy can see themselves as helping to build towards the promised end even if that end is not achieved in their lifetime.

It is no surprise that Marxixts of various hues have been attracted to it because Marxism works on the same principles of working towards a utopia without any certainty that it will happen in a particular individual’s lifetime.

Robotics and AI

The lack of action by politicians throughout the world and in particular in the First Word is staggering. It is quite clear that robotics and AI systems development is rushing ahead. When it reaches the level where most jobs can be done by machines the game is up for capitalism as we know it because huge and rapid unemployment will inevitably result and that in turn will cause a catastrophic drop in demand.

The fact that politicians routinely bleat out the claim that as with all previous technological innovations new jobs will be made to replace the ones taken by machines shows how far away they are from understanding what is happening, Intelligent machines will not only take existing jobs they will be able to do the new jobs which arise.

Free expression is a straight forward concept , you either have it or a range of permitted opinion, a range which may be altered at any time. No country has ever had true freedom of expression but some, especially the Anglophone countries, have had a very wide range of permitted opinion. No more . The range of permitted opinion in Britain and the West has rapidly declined, largely driven by the tentacles of political correctness being spread ever further and more tightly. That creed routinely requires reality is to be denied, for example, schoolchildren are now to told that boys have periods and judges insist that transsexuals appearing in court must be referred to as she (in the case of a transsexual man) or he (in the case of a transsexual woman). What difference is there between such sinister nonsense and Winston Smith in 1984 being forced to say he saw five fingers when only four of O’Brien’s fingers were held up before him?

That is the real killer about political correctness. It requires a constant denial of reality whether that is something as crass boys having periods or the more subtle pressure to disregard reality which comes with the demand that racial and cultural diversity in a society is a good in itself.

It is universities in the West which are most publicly driving a general intolerance of ideas which fall outside the internationalist left’s concept of what should be permitted. To those end students clamour for “safe spaces” where nothing which offends the politically correct is allowed and any speaker with a contrary view is refused a hearing in what is known as no-platforming.

This mentality is also prevalent throughout schools where even the most unlikely subject such as maths can be dragooned into the service of political correctness. Hence, by the time pupils reach the age of 18 they have been well and truly indoctrinated with the “right” politically correct views.

The ideological justification for such behaviour is found in the concept of Repressive Tolerance developed by Herbert Marcuse :

“ Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left.

“Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements that promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or that oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.”

China, Russia and India

All my adult life I have cleaved to the idea that China and Russia (or the USSR) should be kept at arms length. This is because by their very nature and , in the case of China also by her very size ,they represent threats to the West. Instead, naive Western politicians, who are almost all politically correct fantasists by now, have not merely engaged with China and Russia but have done so on the comically mistaken basis that by engaging with the Russians and Chinese they would change Russian and Chinese ways to that of the West as they discovered the supposed benefits of free markets and “joys of diversity.” The result has been that both Russia and China, far from succumbing to Western cultural values, have become increasingly powerful.

They represent different dangers. Russia has all the characteristics of a gangster state but one with a formidable number of nuclear weapons and the Chinese are ever more aggressive and assertive generally. It bodes very ill for the future, especially in China’s case , for that gigantic country has extraordinary ambitions as is shown by their belt and road infrastructure project to provide roads and waterways which will allow China to have access to much of the East . Their disregarded for anything resembling a justice system is seen by the subsequent arrest of three Canadians – see here and here – in response to the Canadians arresting Meng Wanzhou, Chief Financial Officer of the Chinese electronics giant Huawei. Meng’s arrest was at the request of the USA for extradition to the US for breaching sanctions imposed on Iran. The arrest of the three Canadians so soon after Meng’s arrest is best seen as hostage taking by China.

India is showing signs of mimicking China in it attitude towards the West. However, India is far less monolithic than the former, for whereas China as a country and culture has a genuine historical identity , the state of India is a creation of the Raj. Before the Raj the territory which comprises modern India was simply a geographical expression just as Europe is. Consequently, being so much more fragmented than China and lacking a centralising controlling power , there is a much less uniform response to the West by India than that of China to the West.

Africa and Latin America

No real change. Africa has been as brutal as ever and Latin America, although superficially more sophisticated that Africa, is still remarkably violent and disorderly.

The shrinking of democratic control

Throughout the West there is growing serious opposition to mass immigration and internationalist politicians who generally ignore the wishes of their electorates. The internationalists have only themselves to blame if their political correct ideals are trampled on because they are the ones with their incontinent approach to immigration and the realities of human nature who have wrought this change. If the world is headed for racially and ethnically based repression at best and ethnically and racially based civil war at worst they are to blame.

Democracy is a tricky concept which is best thought of as a measure of control over the elite rather than an absolute quality . The hard truth is that there is only one important general political question in any society, namely, how far are the masses able to control the naturally abusive nature of the elite?

The best form of control the masses have is representative government based on a full adult franchise. If the country also has a written constitution with protection for things such as freedom of speech and assembly with a means of holding voter instituted referenda so much the better. Of course, like every human institution it can be perverted but any other political arrangement will make elite abuse much easier for then we are in the realm of dictatorship.

The reality is that countries which have a long lasting and unbroken tradition of political representation on a broad franchise (and consequently a respect for freedom and individual rights) are remarkably rare. The UK, the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are the outstanding examples. All have avoided both civil war and occupation by a conquering power for over 150 years.

In continental Europe there is not a major state with such an unbroken record of avoidance of civil war and occupation better than better than the 73 years since the end of the second world war. Most cannot boast a record of even 50 years (think of Spain and the divided Germany).

Even amongst the more Minor European states it would be difficult to find others who have had a long and unbroken record of representative government.. Switzerland was successfully invaded during Napoleonic times and did not give women the vote until 1971; Denmark,Sweden and Norway were all absolute monarchies until well into the 19th century (although intermittent representative activity in these countries occurred) , with Denmark and Norway .being invaded during the Second World War.

In Asia and Africa the idea of representative politics where it exists, which is not very often, is at best a very corrupt version of what we call democracy.

Latin America has seen many attempts at Bolivarian inspired democracy, but almost as many failures and the area is really not better than Asia or Africa in its actual way of conducting politics.

It is interesting to compare the effectiveness of the English derived states – USA, Canada, Australia and NZ – with the fallibility of the Spanish derived states in Latin America. England and Spain were the two colonial powers who settled large numbers of their own people in colonies which later became independent states . The difference in the political success of the English and Spanish in England and Spain was replicated in their heavily settled colonies.

The European Union has be a great dissolver of democratic control in the First World since 1945.

The world becomes ever more disorderly

I cannot do better than quote my words from 2017:

“Contrary to Steven Pinker’s view that the world is becoming more peaceful, if civil conflict is included things are getting worse. Formal war may be less easy to identify , but ethnic (and often religious ) based strife plus repression by rulers is so widespread outside the West that it is best described as endemic. Globalisation = destabilisation because by making the world’s economic system more complex , there is simply more to go wrong both economically and socially. Sweeping aside traditional relationships and practices is a recipe for social discord. All of economic history tells you one thing above all else: a strong domestic economy is essential for the stability of any country. The ideology of laissez faire, is like all ideologies, at odds with human nature and reality generally and its application inevitably creates huge numbers of losers when applied to places such as China and India.”