I've been watching the internal feed here on one of the newsroom feeds I'm filtering in and watching the press conference with Ballmer and McNeally (after the camera is off) has been interesting. The more I watch, the more i'm convinced that McNeally really needs to go. Through much of the conference he had this deer in the headlights look and off camera he's talking about his accounting problems which clearly Ballmer doesn't care about. If I hear him say "I'd rather have your problems" one more time I'm going to find out where they are and kick him in the teeth.

The more I watch, the more i'm convinced that McNeally really needs to go.

You're kidding right? You've just discovered that now?

I've seen some really asinine comments attributed to him in the past... the one about software not being important springs immediately to mind. Can't find a reference to it, but I recall it annoying me at the time.

Today is the greatest day for the future of Java gaming since P-code. IMHO.

The question now is how does this affect JOGL and OpenGL in general.

No it is not.

I have a bad feeling about Sun and Microsoft joining forces.Think for a moment.

Both sides will share IP and work on some technologies, one mentioned was single sign on across platforms.Now sorry for saying this, but what garantee do we have that Sun and MS won't lock these changes into Solaris and Windows only?

Who knows, Sun may decide to move Java to the great .NET platform and then what?Both sides can decide to envoke their patents and force everybody to only use their products.

Okay, IMO time. Keep in mind that this is just m,y POV and NOT in any way an official Sun staement.

Got that clear?

I think you do need to be careful in assigning TOO much importance to this event. From where I sit we (a) gto a ncie hunk of cash from MSFT (biggest they've ever given anyone I believe) and (b) have basically cleared the impediments to wokring together. How much we DO work together I still think we need to wait and see on.

The differences still remain. We are fundementally different kinds of companies. MSFT runs on money. Sun runs on religion. That fundemental difference can lead to some very differing POVs. I don't think anyone at Sun is naive enough to think that this suddenly makes MSFT our best buddy, it just clears the for the kind of more-friendly competetion we do with the likes of IBM. But we also know enough (I certainly hope) to watch our backs.

Inre management, you gusy missed the big story entirely. Johnnathon Schwarz has just been made president and COO. This makes him second only to Scott, the same role Zander had before he left. Johnnathon previosuly ran software. This is the man who finally made a home unser his CTO (John Fowler) for the GTG. Thats very promising for us in general. It also says a lot about Sun's current views on the importance of sofwtare.

lastly, I just have to add that I think you need to give Scott a bit of a break. He's called on to predict the future all the time and he won't always be right. Remember it was IBM's founder, TJ Watson who said:

"I think the world market for computers is about 5."

Scott has always supported our efforts in the game space as best he could and without him we wouldn't be anywhere today. I've foudn him to be a dynamic and caring leader who really udnerstands the contributions that indviduals make to a company.

Frankly, if Scott formed a new company and asked me tomorrow, I'd galdly go work directly for him.

Got a question about Java and game programming? Just new to the Java Game Development Community? Try my FAQ. Its likely you'll learn something!

My other interpretation of events is that the CLR part of their strategy is failing. They've realized that making a *good* Java-like system is neither cheap nor easy. They are hoping therefor to be able to bring Java back in to suppor their .NET strategy.

Thsi is just my interpretation but if so then its nothing but good news for thsoe of you trying to deploy Java apps in an MSFT desktop environment....

Got a question about Java and game programming? Just new to the Java Game Development Community? Try my FAQ. Its likely you'll learn something!

My other interpretation of events is that the CLR part of their strategy is failing. They've realized that making a *good* Java-like system is neither cheap nor easy. They are hoping therefor to be able to bring Java back in to suppor their .NET strategy.

I'd be inclined to agree with this; MS doesn't normally do things like this unless some plank of their recent strategy has "failed" (in their opinion). One of their defining features is a willingness to do multi-million-dollar U-turns as soon as it becomes clear in reality that they were either wrong in the first place, or that the theory just doesn't seem to work in the marketplace.

And, of course, since the birth of .NET, Java has gained immensely in performance - particularly in networking - which probably makes it a much more attractive tool in their eyes.

Jeff, sorry, but this deal is major f**kup, especially if, as you've put it, Sun is religion driven. Just ask Rich.

I'm extremely sceptical. Although most of Sun guys repeat the same denial "we got 2B$ and lost nothing" mantra, this is a major blow to Sun's integrity and trustworthiness that some of us valued so much.

this is a major blow to Sun's integrity and trustworthiness that some of us valued so much.

I have to disagree entirely.

Sun challenged Microsoft and won. I do not see this as Sun selling out, whatsoever. What did you expect the outcome of Sun's disagreements with Microsoft to be? Other than Microsoft having to pay more money, and requiring Microsoft to ship a modern, compliant JVM, I don't see how it could get much better. And it seems like the compliant JVM will happen, though the wording of the articles I read make is sound like they are only required to ship their old 1.1 VM.

Microsoft Support for Java The companies have agreed that Microsoft may continue to provide product support for the Microsoft Java Virtual Machine that customers have deployed in Microsoft's products.

No mention of shipping a real JVM, or of shipping their own, just supporting custmers who have already deployed. What actually ends up happening is anyones guess, although my own thoughts is that MS will start to ship their own VM again in the next SP and it will still be 1.1 and broken.

No mention of shipping a real JVM, or of shipping their own, just supporting custmers who have already deployed. What actually ends up happening is anyones guess, although my own thoughts is that MS will start to ship their own VM again in the next SP and it will still be 1.1 and broken.

Endolf

Just a guess, but... I suspect it means exactly what it says on the tin. MS are allowed to "support" their customers. If you read the details of the legal wranling at the time, you'd have noted that MS were actually forbidden from releasing bugfixes and patches to their JVM - or, at least, this was *their* claimed interpretation. I turned up at windows update and one day there was a JVM upgrade that could run apps the previous version couldn't, and the next week it was gone; I was no longer allowed to get the upgrade if I didn't have it already.

MS customers who had already decided to standardize on the MS JVM are screwed by something like this; being allowed to support them again (by continuing to release updates, develop the source, etc) is potentially a major boon for MS - although this is usually important to more service based companies (like integrators and consultancies).

Right, but I suspect (guess) that MS will support existing MS JVM users by shipping windows updates that update the existing MS JVM, which if you have XP, is there. What this means for windows 2003 or longhaul, is another issue, but I suspect that XP and bellow will be all MS JVMd again.

Like I said, it's just my theory. The actuall wording doesn't really say alot when it comes to the future deployment of it.

Sun challenged Microsoft and won. I do not see this as Sun selling out, whatsoever. What did you expect the outcome of Sun's disagreements with Microsoft to be? Other than Microsoft having to pay more money, and requiring Microsoft to ship a modern, compliant JVM, I don't see how it could get much better. And it seems like the compliant JVM will happen, though the wording of the articles I read make is sound like they are only required to ship their old 1.1 VM.

Sun didn't won, Sun settled. Settlement has to please both sides. What did MS get? Can you tell that from press releases?

Compliant MS VM will happen when hell freezes over. Java is EOL product at MS and they were given permission to support it (1.1) for some time more.

"It is mankind against MS" said Scot. That joke aside, huge patent money is a dangereous precedent (are you sure you aren't breaking some?). And Sun taking Windows CPP under MS terms also. And undermining EC decission, process which Sun started and left Real/other media/european consumers in cold. It all seems very nice from business perspective (2B$ is lots of money), but that is not Sun I liked.

Btw, I'm not the only one little dissapointed with Sun-MS deal , it seems that mr. Rich Green is not so satisfied with it either. I just hope it is just him taking all of it personal, and not some contract detail that we all don't know about.

I'm not going to speculate on Rich's perspectives or motivations, particualrly as he's no longer at Sun. Keep in mind though that he was hired to help fight MSFT and I'm sure he had higher hopes.

We all had higher hopes. Keep in mind that we *won* sweeping reforms for the industry under the Clinton administration. Then MSFT put a whole lot of money into the Bush campaign. Bush won, and the justice department just dropped enforcement instead impopsing a rediculously minor settlement.

I had to be there when Scott looked at the company heartbroken and announced "today there is officially no justice in the united states."

I'm sorry but it was NOT his failing that let MSFT off the hook. It was the president the american people elected that did it. And there is nothing we could do about it.

Frankly, in the current climate, my opinion is that this is more then we could have hoped for:(1) Sun gets something back in recognition of the grief MSFT caused.(2) The web game folks arent left worrying if there will be ANY VM on Win32.(3) This opens the door for other things, like the possability of MSFT shipping a modern VM. Before this agrement it was absolutely impossible.

So you can look at the glass as half empty if you wish, thats up to you. But the big battle was lost the day Bush was elected. Thats the reality of it.

Got a question about Java and game programming? Just new to the Java Game Development Community? Try my FAQ. Its likely you'll learn something!

But MS and Sun will be working together on the fields of Java and .NETWhat will be our garantee that Java will survive?

Don't get me wrong, on the surface it looks like a win to me, but working together with MS will mean two things:-No open source Java.. these hopes are now gone for good-Microsoft has a way of embracing and extending technologies.

Let me expand on the last.Sun and MS will be swapping patents and probably some tech around (like the single sign on technology).What is to prevent Microsoft from withdrawing its technology and suing Sun into the ground the minute they have all they need?

Let me expand on the last.Sun and MS will be swapping patents and probably some tech around (like the single sign on technology).What is to prevent Microsoft from withdrawing its technology and suing Sun into the ground the minute they have all they need?

Answer, the agreement. Thats what a patent swap is all about. We now have legal contractual rights to each others patents.

In the end, thats all a contract really is-- a legally enforceable agreemnt not to sue each other over specific thinsg laid out in that contract.

Got a question about Java and game programming? Just new to the Java Game Development Community? Try my FAQ. Its likely you'll learn something!

Frankly, in the current climate, my opinion is that this is more then we could have hoped for:(1) Sun gets something back in recognition of the grief MSFT caused.

That part is OK when covered with that 700 mil. $. 900 +350 other is what is making me nervous.

Quote

(2) The web game folks arent left worrying if there will be ANY VM on Win32.

Not so sure I like that one. MS Java is a dead end.

Quote

(3) This opens the door for other things, like the possability of MSFT shipping a modern VM. Before this agrement it was absolutely impossible.

This is something that won't happen. A little richer Java on .Net might, but I doubt that one too.

Quote

So you can look at the glass as half empty if you wish, thats up to you. But the big battle was lost the day Bush was elected. Thats the reality of it.

Nothing is ever lost, everything can be changed.

I still think this deal in this current climate is completely wrong. Bush did some damage, but there is mounting pressure on MS even because of that fiasco. They are seen as a huge theat virtually everywhere now (which wasn't the case a few years back when only Scot shouted), and their throwing of billions to patch some problems is additionaly irritating people. Sun will go playing "man in the middle", which won't work in current polarised climate, and you will loose your identity in that process. I think a new pragmatic managment will find U-turning religion driven workforce and ESPECIALLY supportes extremely hard. I sure hope I'm wrong, because like(d) "Sun's way", but next 2 or 3 quarters be more revealing.

java-gaming.org is not responsible for the content posted by its members, including references to external websites,
and other references that may or may not have a relation with our primarily
gaming and game production oriented community.
inquiries and complaints can be sent via email to the info‑account of the
company managing the website of java‑gaming.org