It’s no secret the Hollywood machine is more concerned with the bottom line than the artistic integrity of any given project. It is a business of course and if all they did was take huge risks on high concept films, there wouldn’t be much money lying around to get a few passion projects made amongst the glut of remakes, reboots, re-imaginings, sequels, and book/comic book/graphic novel/manga adaptations.

However, the growing trend to take nostalgic properties or all-too recently released foreign films and turn them into big budget/high profile projects has gone from being irritating to just plain offensive.

(still to come: Straw Dogs, Footloose, The Thing, The Three Musketeers, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo)

Now, there are varying degrees of imagination and success within this grouping. Whereas director Cary Joji Fukunaga’s take on Jane Eyre was worth the effort, thankfully audiences didn’t reward such unnecessary reboots like Conan the Barbarian and Fright Night. I doubt loyal readers need much reminding as to what I thought of X-Men: First Class; Footloose looks like Step Up: Piss on Kevin Bacon’s Legacy; and as much as I respect David Fincher, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo wasn’t even given enough time for the original to accumulate dust on the DVD shelf before American audiences (who feel reading subtitles is some form of cruel and unusual punishment) will get to see a mainstreamed version of what their more in-the-know co-workers were talking about all the way back in 2010.

Still in the works waiting to poison the future are a litany of beloved semi-cult classics getting the remake treatment like Red Dawn, Akira, Total Recall, The Crow, Oldboy, Point Break, The Highlander, Evil Dead, Robocop, Bloodsport, The Toxic Avenger, The Warriors, The Wild Bunch, and Escape from New York (more on some of these projects can be found at IGN). The notion that some of these will be fashioned into some new, shiny novelty item makes me equal parts nauseous and angry. (Caution: anyone sitting near me when my morbid curiosity makes me review these films may want to wear a Gallagher-quality poncho).

(still to come: Paranormal Activity 3, Johnny English Reborn, A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas, Happy Feet Two, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn: Part 1, Piranha 3DD, The Muppets, New Year’s Eve (sure the actors who also were in Valentine’s Day may be playing different characters but what’s the damn difference?), Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked, Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol)

Ugh. That’s a lot of rehashed material. Some worked well for what they were (Fast Five, Kung Fu Panda 2, Harry Potter) whereas most were either innocuous or blatant cash grabs hoping to sucker enough people who felt the need to complete the set since they’d already endured the previous films in the respective franchises.

And all of this doesn’t’ touch comic books and novels being adapted for the silver screen or 3D re-releases of films like Top Gun, The Lion King, CraptanicTitanic, Star Wars, or AvaturdAvatar – with plenty more to come if these should prove successful.

At this point, it’s almost offensive that Hollywood makes any films that aren’t remakes/reboots/re-imaginings/sequels. It’s like teasing us that there might be more original content in the future … which apparently is a lie (like the cake, or so I’m told).

Of course, the fundamental thing that drives this disturbing train of unoriginality is the box office. I understand that going to the movies is a time-honored tradition, and it should be. But unless more people realize they’re perpetuating the cycle by settling for the needless (and generally crappy) remake simply because it’s the only new release, nothing will change. The same goes for bad 3D conversions. It’s fine to want to see a movie but if you’ve been on the losing end of a poorly converted 3D film one too many times, try the 2D version next time instead. Eventually, the people financing such things will get the message (or so I dearly hope).

This leads to the underpinning of this whole rant. While it’s easy to blame Hollywood, and fun to do, they’re merely the financial gatekeepers. The market dictates their decisions. And every ticket holder should understand that they’re holding the key to changing trends for the better. It’s up to all of us to demand more original content via our pocketbooks. Critics can pan each and every unoriginal film but as long as each of them turns a profit, go ahead and circle the even worse sequel’s release date a year or two later on your calendar.

Until audiences as a whole start being more fiscally responsible about what movies they choose, you might as well just comb through your DVD library and select your favorite films … because sooner, not later, you’ll probably see its legacy tarnished by some over-hyped teen sensation being backed by a metric buttload of CGI and some emo/hipster soundtrack. And in the end, we’re all a little bit to blame for it.

You are right, though, as long as people are paying money to see any of these, and the subsequent dvd releases, the studios are going to keep making same old things. As for the remakes of foreign fares, I know not what to do to dissuade the producers. I saw the original “The Debt” and couldn’t figure out why it needed a remake. The also surprising part is the willingness on the part of filmmakers such as Fincher to be involved in such a project. It’s not like he can’t get any project funded. I can understand if he were a newbie director trying to get work. Of course, the willingness on the actors to be involved in such project is also questionable. More paycheck, Mr. Bond? Heck, why not. I supposed it goes back to producers, they just want to make money and the surest way they know how. The smallest risk they are willing to take on new screenplays. Or perhaps, there are just not that many good ones being written, though, i’m not sure i’d believe that.

The problem I supposed is that while audience can vote with their money, they cannot vote until a movie is made. Thus, the willingness on the producers to take chances are being tested heavily and they try to cover all their bases from losing money over and over. See, the audience like such and such movie, let’s make more of the same.

http://soberingconclusion.com/movies/?page_id=904 Ian Forbes

Yeah, you’ve pretty much nailed it on the head, Didi. Hollywood will take the safest route (it is their money to lose after all) and until audiences show a consistent desire to see more intelligent and original films, we’re going to be drowning in the crap they’re just beginning to shovel down our eye sockets.

Didi

the other thing that drives me mad is that all the producers are looking for that one big thing. considering that they spend substantial amount of dough to market one of their big event movie, there’s got to be big enough money to make 10 smaller non-event movies that would actually have 10 times the chance of turning profits with 10 different ways to market them to 10 different type of audiences if they wish to.

if a studio or producer scrap one of these crappy remakes and spend the money on 10 smaller newer projects, one of them got to hit, right?

Browse the Site

Meta

Archived Entry

Set free onto the Internet :

Tuesday, Sep 13th, 2011 at 9:37 pm

Sobering Conclusion
is powered by WordPress 3.1.4
and delivered to you in 0.696 seconds using 36 queries.
All images and screen shots are the property of their respective owners. Filmography links courtesy of The Internet Movie Database.
** The opinions on this site are done for entertainment purposes only, mostly mine. Copyright 2005-2013.
Any similarity to a real review or actual information is unintentional and unfortunate. Eat Snacky Smores.