13 Responses to Ron Paul isn’t actually a crank

I know for a fact I lack what it takes to be POTUS. Paul is also lacking. He lacks executive experience (beyond his private practice and whatever he had in the military), and also lacks the basic visuals to be a viable candidate. So what’s the point of him running? Getting a message out?

While I agree with him on many things, I fail to see any wisdom in him running for POTUS. He should quite the race and endorse Johnson. That said I will probably vote for Perry. Johnson has solid exec experience, but also lacks the “visuals” to win.

I’m interested in following Paul and seeing if he goes after the current administration with as much vigor as he went after the Bush administration or if he’ll keep it as generalities.

He is one of the biggest campaign contribution recipients and bomb throwing at the Republicans in their own debates is one of the reasons he gets airtime by a media who would have otherwise trivialize him. Airtime = money by both his followers and Democrats. He may believe what he says, but I believe he plays to the media even though its in a way that hurts his electability in the long run. This campaign should be telling if I’m mistaken.

Funny, that everyone looks down on Ron Paul when they are purposely choosing between Obama (who has proven to damage the country in the last 2 years) and the Repbulican establishment (who has proven to damage the country in the 8 years before). You people need to open your eyes. This isn’t a game between the D and the R team it is a matter of reversing course. The ONLY candidate that is even intellectually qualified is Ron Paul. The others wouldn’t know the constitution from the back of a cereal box.

Paul disqualifies himself IMNHO by sailing under a false flag. He is not a Conservative, and is optionally a Republican when it suits him. He damn sure is not a “Reagan Republican” as he has claimed to be (when is suits).