FDD claims that the journalists worked for a “terrorist organization” because their channel is affiliated with Hamas, thus implicitly justifying Israel’s decision to kill them, a position firmly rejected by human rights organizations and media freedom watchdogs.

Executed in the line of duty

On November 20, the [Israeli army] targeted a car on a Gaza City street with two cameramen from al-Aqsa TV, Mahmoud al-Kumi, and Hussam Salama, killing them both. The deputy head of al-Aqsa TV, which is the official television station of the Hamas government in Gaza, told Human Rights Watch that al-Kumi and Salama were cameramen covering the conflict and were returning from filming in al-Shifa Hospital in a car marked “TV.” The two men’s families, interviewed separately, said the men were neither participating in the fighting nor members of any armed group. Human Rights Watch found no evidence, including during visits to the men’s homes, to contradict that claim.

Newseum stands by inclusion

The Newseum Journalists Memorial recognizes 2,246 journalists who died or were killed while reporting the news. To be listed on the memorial, an individual must have been a contributor of news, commentary or photography to a news outlet; an editor or news executive; a producer, camera operator, sound engineer or other member of a broadcast crew; or a documentary filmmaker.

Hussam Salama and Mahmoud Al-Kumi were cameramen in a car clearly marked “TV.” The Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders and The World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers all consider these men journalists killed in the line duty.

In another incident cited by Human Rights Watch, Israel attacked the Naama building housing numerous media organizations on 21 November 2012 in Gaza City. Shrapnel from the attack killed two-year-old Abdelrahman Naim, who lived across the street.

Predator

“On its website, the Israeli army says it is committed to certain values,” Reporters Without Borders notes. “However, these fine principles are contradicted by the facts.”

FDD’s attempt to pressure the Newseum to exclude Palestinian journalists who are victims of Israeli violence can be seen as part of a strategy to further dehumanize the Palestinian people and justify or cover up Israeli crimes.

Update, 13 May: Newseum surrenders to pressure after all

Following intense pressure from Israel lobby groups, the Newseum has reversed its position and decided to exclude Mahmoud al-Kumi and Hussam Salama, the two Palestinian journalists extrajudicially-executed by Israel last November in Gaza, from its memorial event for fallen journalists today.

Serious questions have been raised as to whether two of the individuals included on our initial list of journalists who died covering the news this past year were truly journalists or whether they were engaged in terrorist activities.

We take the concerns raised about these two men seriously and have decided to re-evaluate their inclusion as journalists on our memorial wall pending further investigation.

Terrorism has altered the landscape in many areas, including the rules of war and engagement, law, investigative and interrogation techniques, and the detention of enemy combatants. Journalism is no exception.

To further our First Amendment mission to provide a forum where all may speak freely, the Newseum will establish a new initiative to explore differing views on the new questions facing journalism and journalists.

Of course, comprehensive investigations were done by Human Rights Watch, as explained above.

In light of Human Rights Watch’s findings, the Newseum’s suggestion that al-Kumi and Salama were engaged in “terrorist activities” is really a craven justification of Israel’s claim that it has the right to murder journalists it doesn’t like at will.

What the Newseum really means is that al-Kumi and Salama’s status has already been reassessed in order to bring the Newseum’s policies in line with the propaganda and talking points of the Zionist groups that attacked it.

Comments

If the Newseum has integrity, it shouldn't be the site of a Zionist organization's conference to begin with, but if it goes further and caves to that organization's pressure, I hope we'll see principled journalists speaking out against it.

didn't Israel bomb a UN place when they entered in Lebanon? doesn't Israel always attack reporters by "mistake"? they want no witnesses. Adding these 2 reporters to the celebration is a reminder that Israel is the reason they are dead. They love burying history as if it never happened.

Human Rights Watch does not help because it gave a statement on this story about journalists praising Hamas and this did not make them propagandists. Journalists should object because we are not there to praise but to report as accurate and fair an account as we can. If we report Hamas was praised it would be to say x praised Hamas but y was critical, not they we praised Hamas.