When people ask,
What do you have to do to become a Buddhist?, we say that
we take refuge in Buddha Dhamma Sangha. And to take refuge we recite
a formula in the Pali language:

Buddham saranam
gacchami
I go to the Buddha for refuge

Dhammam saranam
gacchami
I go to the Dhamma for refuge

Sangham saranam
gacchami
I go to the Sangha for refuge.

As we practise
more and more and begin to realize the profundity of the Buddhist
Teachings, it becomes a real joy to take these refuges, and even just
their recitation inspires the mind. After twenty-two years as a monk,
I still like to chant Buddham saranam gacchami
 in fact I like it more than I did twenty-one years ago
 because then it didnt really mean anything to me, I just
chanted it because I had to, because it was part of the tradition.
Merely taking refuge verbally in the Buddha doesnt mean you
take refuge in anything: a parrot could be trained to say Buddham
saranam gacchami, and it would probably be as meaningful
to a parrot as it is to many Buddhists. These words are for reflection,
looking at them and actually investigating what they mean: what refuge
means, what Buddha means. When we say, I take refuge
in the Buddha, what do we mean by that? How can we use that
so it is not just a repetition of nonsense syllables, but something
that really helps to remind us, gives us direction and increases our
devotion, our dedication to the path of the Buddha?

The word Buddha
is a lovely word  it means The one who knows
and the first refuge is in Buddha as the personification of wisdom.
Un-personified wisdom remains too abstract for us: we cant conceive
a bodiless, soul-less wisdom, and so as wisdom always seems to have
a personal quality to it, using Buddha as its symbol is very useful.

We can use the
word Buddha to refer to Gotama, the founder of what is now known as
Buddhism, the historical sage who attained Parinibbana in India
2,500 years ago, the teacher of the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold
Path, teachings from which we still benefit today. But when we take
refuge in the Buddha, it doesnt mean that we take refuge in
some historical prophet, but in that which is wise in the universe,
in our minds, that which is not separate from us but is more real
than anything we can conceive with the mind or experience through
the senses. Without any Buddha-wisdom in the universe, life for any
length of time would be totally impossible; it is the Buddha-wisdom
that protects. We call it Buddha-wisdom, other people can call it
other things if they want, these are just words. We happen to use
the words of our tradition. Were not going to argue about Pali
words, Sanskrit words, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, English or any other,
were just using the term Buddha-wisdom as a conventional symbol
to help remind us to be wise, to be alert, to be awake.

Many forest bhikkhus
in the North-East of Thailand use the word Buddho as their
meditation object. They use it as a kind of koan. Firstly,
they calm the mind by following the inhalations and exhalations using
the syllables BUD-DHO, and then begin to contemplate, What is
Buddho, the one who knows? What is the knowing?

When I used to
travel around the North-East of Thailand on tudong I liked
to go and stay at the monastery of Ajahn Fun. Ajahn Fun was a much-loved
and deeply respected monk, the teacher of the Royal Family, and he
was so popular that he was constantly receiving guests. I would sit
at his kuti [hut] and hear him give the most amazing kind of Dhamma
talks, all on the subject of Buddho as far as I
could see, it was all that he taught. He could make it into a really
profound meditation, whether for an illiterate farmer or an elegant,
western-educated Thai aristocrat. The main part of his teaching was
to not just mechanically repeat Buddho, but to reflect
and investigate, to awaken the mind to really look into the Buddho,
the one who knows really investigate its beginning, its
end, above and below, so that ones whole attention was stuck
onto it. When one did that, Buddho became something that
echoed through the mind. One would investigate it, look at it, examine
it before it was said and after it was said, and eventually one would
start listening to it and hear beyond the sound, until one heard the
silence.

A refuge is a
place of safety, and so when superstitious people would come to my
teacher Ajahn Chah, wanting charmed medallions or little talismans
to protect them from bullets and knives, ghosts and so on, he would
say, Why do you want things like that? The only real protection
is taking refuge in the Buddha. Taking refuge in the Buddha is enough.
But their faith in Buddha usually wasnt quite as much as their
faith in those silly little medallions. They wanted something made
out of bronze and clay, stamped and blessed. This is what is called
taking refuge in bronze and clay, taking refuge in superstition, taking
refuge in that which is truly unsafe and cannot really help us.

Today in modern
Britain we find that generally people are more sophisticated. They
dont take refuge in magic charms, they take refuge in things
like the Westminster Bank  but that is still taking refuge in
something that offers no safety. Taking refuge in the Buddha, in wisdom,
means that we have a place of safety. When there is wisdom, when we
act wisely and live wisely, we are truly safe. The conditions around
us might change. We cant guarantee what will happen to the material
standard of living, or that the Westminster Bank will survive the
decade. The future remains unknown and mysterious, but in the present,
by taking refuge in the Buddha we have that presence of mind now to
reflect on and learn from life as we live it.

Wisdom doesnt
mean having a lot of knowledge about the world; we dont have
to go to university and collect information about the world to be
wise. Wisdom means knowing the nature of conditions as were
experiencing them. It is not just being caught up in reacting to and
absorbing into the conditions of our bodies and minds out of habit,
out of fear, worry, doubt, greed and so on, but it is using that Buddho,
that one who knows, to observe that these conditions are
changing. It is the knowing of that change that we call Buddha and
in which we take refuge. We make no claims to Buddha as being me
or mine. We dont say, I am Buddha, but
rather, I take refuge in Buddha. It is a way of humbly
submitting to that wisdom, being aware, being awake.

Although in one
sense taking refuge is something we are doing all the time, the Pali
formula we use is a reminder  because we forget, because we
habitually take refuge in worry, doubt, fear, anger, greed and so
on. The Buddha-image is similar; when we bow to it we dont imagine
that it is anything other than a bronze image, a symbol. It is a reflection
and makes us a little more aware of Buddha, of our refuge in Buddha
Dhamma Sangha. The Buddha image sits in great dignity and calm, not
in a trance but fully alert, with a look of wakefulness and kindness,
not being caught in the changing conditions around it. Though the
image is made of brass and we have these flesh-and-blood bodies and
it is much more difficult for us, still it is a reminder. Some people
get very puritanical about Buddha-images, but here in the West I havent
found them to be a danger. The real idols that we believe in and worship
and that constantly delude us are our thoughts, views and opinions,
our loves and hates, our self-conceit and pride.

The second refuge
is in the Dhamma, in ultimate truth or ultimate reality. Dhamma is
impersonal; we dont in any way try to personify it to make it
any kind of personal deity. When we chant in Pali the verse on Dhamma,
we say it is sanditthiko akaliko ehipassiko opanayiko paccattam
veditabbo vinnuhi. As Dhamma has no personal attributes,
we cant even say it is good or bad or anything that has any
superlative or comparative quality; it is beyond the dualistic conceptions
of mind.

So when we describe
Dhamma or give an impression of it, we do it through words such as
sanditthiko, which means immanent, here-and-now.
That brings us back into the present; we feel a sense of immediacy,
of now. You may think that Dhamma is some kind of thing that is out
there, something you have to find elsewhere, but sanditthikodhamma
means that it is immanent, here-and-now.

Akalikadhamma
means that Dhamma is not bound by any time condition. The word
akala means timeless. Our conceptual mind cant conceive
of anything that is timeless, because our conceptions and perceptions
are time-based conditions, but what we can say is that Dhamma is akala,
not bound by time.

Ehipassikadhamma
means to come and see, to turn towards or go to the Dhamma. It
means to look, to be aware. It is not that we pray to the Dhamma to
come, or wait for it to tap us on the shoulder; we have to put forth
effort. It is like Christs saying, Knock on the door and
it shall be opened. Ehipassiko means that we have to
put forward that effort, to turn towards that truth.

Opanayiko means
leading inwards, towards the peace within the mind. Dhamma doesnt
take us into fascination, into excitement, romance and adventure,
but leads to Nibbana, to calm, to silence.

Paccattam veditabbo
vinnuhi means that we can only know Dhamma through direct experience.
It is like the taste of honey  if someone else tastes it, we
still dont know its flavour. We may know the chemical formula
or be able to recite all the great poetry ever written about honey,
but only when we taste it for ourselves do we really know what it
is like. It is the same with Dhamma: we have to taste it, we have
to know it directly.

Taking refuge
in Dhamma is taking another safe refuge. It is not taking refuge in
philosophy or intellectual concepts, in theories, in ideas, in doctrines
or beliefs of any sort. It is not taking refuge in a belief in Dhamma,
or a belief in God or in some kind of force in outer space or something
beyond or something separate, something that we have to find sometime
later. The descriptions of the Dhamma keep us in the present, in the
here-and-now, unbound by time. Taking refuge is an immediate immanent
reflection in the mind, it is not just repeating Dhammam
Saranam gacchamilike a parrot, thinking, Buddhists
say this so I have to say it. We turn towards the Dhamma, we
are aware now, take refuge in Dhamma, now as an immediate action,
an immediate reflection of being the Dhamma, being that very truth.

Because our conceiving
mind tends always to delude us, it takes us into becoming. We think,
Ill practise meditation so that Ill become enlightened
in the future. I will take the Three Refuges in order to become
a Buddhist. I want to become wise. I want to get away from
suffering and ignorance and become something else. This
is the conceiving mind, the desire mind, the mind that always deludes
us. Rather than constantly thinking in terms of becoming something,
we take refuge in being Dhamma in the present.

The impersonality
of Dhamma bothers many people, because devotional religion tends to
personify everything and people coming from such traditions dont
feel right if they cant have some sort of personal relationship
with it. I remember one time, a French Catholic missionary came to
stay in our monastery and practise meditation. He felt at something
of a loss with Buddhism because he said it was like cold surgery,
there was no personal relationship with God. One cannot have a personal
relationship with Dhamma, one cannot say Love the Dhamma!
or The Dhamma loves me!; there is no need for that. We
only need a personal relationship with something we are not, like
our mother, father, husband or wife, something separate from us.

We dont
need to take refuge in mother or father again, someone to protect
us and love us and say, I love you no matter what you do. Everything
is going to be all right, and pat us on the head. The Buddha-Dhamma
is a very maturing refuge, it is a religious practice that is a complete
sanity or maturity, in which we are no longer seeking a mother or
father, because we dont need to become any thing any more.
We dont need to be loved or protected by anyone any more, because
we can love and protect others, and that is all that is important.
We no longer have to ask or demand things from others, whether it
is from other people or even some deity or force that we feel is separate
from us and has to be prayed to and asked for guidance.

We give up all
our attempts to conceive Dhamma as being this or that or anything
at all, and let go of our desire to have a personal relationship with
the truth. We have to be that truth, here and now. Being that truth,
taking that refuge, calls for an immediate awakening, for being wise
now, being Buddha, being Dhamma in the present.

The Third refuge
is Sangha, which means a group. Sangha may be the Bhikkhu-Sangha
[the order of monks]  or the Ariya-Sangha, the group
of the Noble Beings, all those who live virtuously, doing good and
refraining from evil with bodily action and speech. Here, taking refuge
in the Sangha with Sangham saranam gacchami means
we take refuge in virtue, in that which is good, virtuous, kind, compassionate
and generous. We dont take refuge in those things in our minds
that are mean, nasty, cruel, selfish, jealous, hateful, angry 
even though admittedly that is what we often tend to do out of heedlessness,
out of not reflecting, not being awake, but just reacting to conditions.
Taking refuge in the Sangha means, on the conventional level, doing
good and refraining from evil with bodily action and speech.

All of us have
both good thoughts and intentions and bad ones. Sankharas [conditioned
phenomena] are that way, some are good and some arent, some
are indifferent, some are wonderful and some are nasty. Conditions
in the world are changing conditions. We cant just think the
best, the most refined thoughts and feel only the best and the kindest
feelings; both good and bad thoughts and feelings come and go, but
we take refuge in virtue rather than in hatred. We take refuge in
that in all of us that intends to do good, which is compassionate
and kind and loving towards ourselves and others.

So the refuge
of Sangha is a very practical refuge for day-to-day living within
the human form, within this body, in relation to the bodies of other
beings and the physical world that we live in. When we take this refuge
we do not act in any way that causes division, disharmony, cruelty,
meanness or unkindness to any living being, including ourself, our
own body and mind. This is being supatipanno,
one whopractises well.

When we are aware
and mindful, when we reflect and observe, we begin to see that acting
on impulses that are cruel and selfish only brings harm and misery
to ourself as well as to others. It doesnt take any great powers
of observation to see that. Ifyouve met any criminals
in your life, people who have acted selfishly and evilly, youll
find them constantly frightened, obsessed, paranoid, suspicious, having
to drink a lot, take drugs, keep busy, do all kinds of things, because
living with themselves is so horrible. Five minutes alone with themselves
without any dope or drink or anything would seem to them like eternal
hell, because the kammic result of evil is so appalling, mentally.
Even if theyre never caught by the police or sent to prison,
dont think theyre going to get away with anything. In
fact sometimes that is the kindest thing, to put them in prison and
punish them; it makes them feel better. I was never a criminal, but
I have managed to tell a few lies and do a few mean and nasty things
in my lifetime, and the results were always unpleasant. Even today
when I think of those things, it is not a pleasant memory, it is not
something that I want to go to announce to everybody, not something
that I feel joy when I think about.

When we are meditating
we realize that we have to be completely responsible for how we live.
In no way can we blame anyone else for anything at all. Before I started
to meditate I used to blame people and society: If only my parents
had been completely wise, enlightened arahants, I would be
all right. If only the United Sates of America had a truly wise, compassionate
government that never made any mistakes, supported me completely and
appreciated me fully. If only my friends were wise and encouraging
and the teachers truly wise, generous and kind. If everyone around
me was perfect, if the society was perfect, if the world was wise
and perfect, then I wouldnt have any of these problems. But
all have failed me.

My parents had
a few flaws and they did mak e a few mistakes, but now when I look
back on it they didnt make very many. At the time when I was
look-ing to blame others and I was desperately trying to think of
the faults of my parents, I really had to work at it. My generation
was very good at blaming everything on the United States, and that
is a really easy one because the United States makes a lot of mistakes.

But when we meditate
it means we can no longer get away with that kind of lying to ourselves.
We suddenly realize that no matter what anyone else has done, or how
unjust the society might be or what our parents might have been like,
we can in no way spend the rest of our lives blaming anyone else 
that is a complete waste of time. We have to accept complete responsibility
for our life, and live it. Even if we did have miserable parents,
were raised in a terrible society with no opportunities, it still
doesnt matter. There is no one else to blame for our suffering
now but ourselves, our own ignorance, selfishness and conceit.

In the crucifixion
of Jesus we can see a brilliant example of a man in pain, stripped
naked, made fun of, completely humiliated and then publicly executed
in the most horrible, excruciating way, yet without blaming anyone:
Forgive them, Lord, they know not what they do. This is
a sign of wisdom  it means that even if people are crucifying
us, nailing us to the cross, scourging us, humiliating us in every
way, it is our aversion, self-pity, pettiness and selfishness that
is the problem, the suffering. It is not even the physical pain that
is the suffering, it is the aversion. Now if Jesus Christ had said,
Curse you for treating me like this!, he would have been
just another criminal and would have been forgotten a few days later.

Reflect on this,
because we tend to easily blame others for our suffering, and we can
justify it because maybe other people are mistreating us or exploiting
us or dont understand us or are doing dreadful things to us.
Were not denying that, but we make nothing of it any more. We
forgive, we let go of those memories, because taking refuge in Sangha
means, here and now, doing good and refraining from doing evil with
bodily action and speech.

So may you reflect
on this and really see Buddha Dhamma Sangha as a refuge. Look on them
as opportunities for reflection and consideration. It is not a matter
of believing in Buddha Dhamma Sangha  not a faith in concepts
 but a using of symbols for mindfulness, for awakening the mind
here-and-now, being here-and-now.