Grammar'lujah!

Please watch the mini-lecture at the bottom of the page.

Does Traditional Grammar Have A Place?

The simple answer to the above question is YES. However, it is how we teach grammar and the way we integrate it into our lessons that are the keys to helping our students come to grips with the many intricate aspects of this (often boring) subject.

​Explicit vs. Implicit: One of the most hotly debated topics in the world of second language learning revolves around how to teach grammar - implicitly or explicitly? But why choose between the two? Don't they both have a place?

Learning by doing: Many teachers (and students) have an outdated belief that we must learn the rules of grammar before we start writing. Although this tradition may work, one must ask if this method is the most effective. For many researchers involved in the study of language acquisition (especially first language) the answer to this question is NO - learning rules and then writing is not the most effective way of teaching/learning grammar.

According to research one of the most effective ways to learn grammar for writing is by writing and reading. That's right! Learning by doing! So instead of teaching rules and then writing - why not teach writing and incorporate grammar. Of course this does not mean that we should be avoiding explicit grammar instruction entirely, all it means is the way we approach grammar instruction should be in a more of a "hands on" way instead of a "memorize this rule" sort of way.

In terms of grammar for speaking the research often supports both implicit (e.g. recasts) and explicit (e.g. metalinguistic feedback) forms of instruction.