The title of the article is The Origin of “Fake News” in Holocaust Denial

The following quote is from the article:

Begin quote

No reasonable person with a modicum of intelligence can actually believe that Hitler and his Nazis co-conspirators did not plan the mass extermination of Jews at the Wannsse Conference, and that they did not carry it out at death camps, such as Treblinka, Sorbibor, Majdanek and Auschwitz, Birkenau, as well as by SS mobile killing units that gathered Jews in such places as Babi Yar and the Ponary Woods.

End quote

He’s talking about me: I am not a reasonable person, according to Dershowitz, and I don’t even have a “modicum of intelligence” according to him.

Maybe I have a little bit more than a “modicum of intelligence” and that’s why I don’t believe in the Holocaust.

Alan Dershowitz continues on with this quote:

Begin quote

… let me be clear that I do not believe that any university should tolerate, in the name of academic freedom these falsehoods being taught in the classroom. There is not and should not be academic freedom to commit educational malpractice by presenting provable lies as acceptable facts. Universities must and do have standards: no credible university would tolerate a professor teaching that slavery did not exist, or that the Earth is flat. Holocaust denial does not meet any reasonable standard deserving the protection of academic freedom.

End quote

What he is saying, as I understand it, is that Holocaust denial should not be included in “free speech” which we still have in America, but not for long. It won’t be long before the USA becomes the 21st country that will not allow free speech about the Holocaust, although every other claim will still be allowed. In other words, believing in flying saucers will still be allowed but Holocaust denial will not be allowed.

Old photo of the room where the conference was held

Like this:

This is not the first time that some hack from the Lobby has hyped a hypocritical oxymoron, which in this case demands censorship in the name of academic freedom. How ironic! Unfortunately, with their fifth column in the media, they have been able to sell such total contradictions as being quite ‘reasonable’. Repeat it often enough and the gullible will accept it as true.

So we’re back to ,”no denying the holo”.
Where’s George Orwell. Remember the ,”thought police” from 1984? Getting busted for “thoughtcrime”.
Off the topic here,but you need to do something on Mein Kampf.
Before I started reading it,people would have you think the book was along the lines of the “Turner Diaries”.
I’ve been hard pressed to find racism in Mein Kampf. If anything,it’s stereotyping in parts of the book. That’s a long way from racism.
The way history has presented Uncle Adolph,is way off from what he’s talking about in his book. He’s not a “madman”. He’s just talking about what everyone else is too chickenshit to talk about.

Alan Dershowitz wrote: “No reasonable person with a modicum of intelligence can actually believe that Hitler and his Nazis co-conspirators did not plan the mass extermination of Jews at the Wannsse Conference”

Co-conspirators? Do you mean the ‘Holocaust’ is a conspiracy theory, Mr. Dershowitz?

And do you mean exterminationist Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer is not a reasonable person?

This is a fact very few know about, the Wannsee Conference did take place, but Heydrich was so concerned about security and about people learning about it – who shouldn’t have, that he moved the conference over the road to a spot an 100 yards away. It did not take place in this famous house, and they did discuss the killing and mass deportation of the Jews, and how it could be accomplished in secrecy. Heydrich was in charge, Eichmann took the notes, and it all did happen as described except the venue was switched. The event was held un another Nazi-owned building about 100 meters across the road.

Herbert ….there is NO proof that any discussion at this meeting had to do with killing Jews.
The policy was emigration NOT extermination….you might want to do more research onto the matter.
The Transfer agreement might be a good start for you. There was NO system operating in any of the camps that were designed or worked to kill people on any huge numbers. If you truly believe that there was a plan to massively kill Jews or whoever, please show the mechanism they used to do it. So those are the two things against you here….No plan, and no mechanism to do it.
You can dream all you want but facts are facts.
Do you have any idea what it would take to kill millions of people in the short amount of time they said it was done, using the many different methods they say were used? Time to come into reality, and leave your dream world.

FG
I do not remember the source of my comment, but I did came across it while preparing my blog on the subject. One source in German states clearly that the conference took place in the dining room of the guesthouse, which is not the building normally shown, which in fact was the seat of Interpol

Herbert you still are dancing around whether the Jews were now going to be exterminated by what had transpired at that meeting.
Typical Jew slight of hand…. Again show the paper trail and the means of doing it.

FG
I do not remember the source of my comment, but I did came across it while preparing my blog on the subject. One source in German states clearly that the conference took place in the dining room of the guesthouse, which is not the building normally shown, and in fact was the seat of Interpol