Of course, the already open PR are there, and it is ok, we can handle them.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:29 AM tesonep at gmail.com <tesonep at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
> Pharo is not Smalltalk / Smalltalk is not Pharo / Pharo is Smalltalk.
> Now that I have your attention because it seems the only read mail has
> to have this.
>> We have to continue improving the quality of Pharo. One of the biggest
> assets that we have in Pharo are the tons of tests. So, we need to
> reject any PR that does not have tests or it is not already tested.
>> To ease this quality measure, please add some comments on the PR about
> how your new code or modified code is tested or benchmarked.
>> Cheers.
>> --
> Pablo Tesone.
>tesonep at gmail.com
--
Pablo Tesone.
tesonep at gmail.com