Manganese nodule

Polymetallic nodules, also called manganese nodules, are rock concretions on the sea bottom formed of concentric layers of iron and manganesehydroxides around a core. The core may be microscopically small and is sometimes completely transformed into manganese minerals by crystallization. When visible to the naked eye, it can be a small test (shell) of a microfossil (radiolarian or foraminifer), a phosphatizedshark tooth, basalt debris or even fragments of earlier nodules. As nodules can be found in vast quantities, and contain valuable metals, deposits were identified as having economic interest in the 1960’s by John Mero.[1]

Manganese nodule

Nodules on the Seabed

Nodules vary in size from tiny particles visible only under a microscope to large pellets more than 20 centimetres (8 in) across. However, most nodules are between 3 and 10 cm (1 and 4 in) in diameter, about the size of hens eggs or potatoes. Their surface textures vary from smooth to rough. They are frequently have botryoidal (mammilated or knobby) texture and vary from spherical to typically oblate, sometimes prolate, or otherwise irregular. The bottom, buried in sediment, is generally rougher than the top due to a different type of growth.[2]

Contents

Nodules lie on the seabed sediment, often partly or completely buried. They vary greatly in abundance, in some cases touching one another and covering more than 70% of the sea floor. The total amount of polymetallic nodules on the sea floor was estimated at 500 billion tons by Alan A. Archer of the London Geological Museum in 1981.[citation needed]

Polymetalic nodules are found in both shallow (e.g. Baltic Sea [3]) and deeper waters (e.g. central Pacific), even in lakes[citation needed], and are thought to have been a feature of the seas and oceans at least since the deep oceans oxidised in the Ediacaran period over 540 million years ago.[4]

The largest of these deposits in terms of nodule abundance and metal concentration occur in the Clarion Clipperton Zone on vast abyssal plains in the deep ocean between 4,000 and 6,000 m (13,000 and 20,000 ft). The International Seabed Authority estimates that the total amount of nodules in the Clarion Clipperton Zone exceeds 21 Bt of nodules containing more than 270 Mt of nickel, 5.95 Bt of manganese, 234 Mt of copper and 46.6 Mt of cobalt.[2]

All of these deposits are in international waters apart from the Penrhyn Basin, which lies within the exclusive economic zone of the Cook Islands.

On the seabed the abundance of nodules varies and is likely controlled by the thickness and stability of a geochemically active layer that forms at the seabed.[9]Pelagic sediment type and seabed bathymetry (or geomorphology) likely influence the characteristics of the geochemically active layer.

Nodule growth is one of the slowest of all known geological phenomena, on the order of a centimeter over several million years.[10] Several processes are hypothesized to be involved in the formation of nodules, including the precipitation of metals from seawater (hydrogenous), the remobilization of manganese in the water column (diagenetic), the derivation of metals from hot springs associated with volcanic activity (hydrothermal), the decomposition of basaltic debris by seawater (halmyrolitic) and the precipitation of metal hydroxides through the activity of microorganisms (biogenic[11]). Several of these processes may operate concurrently or they may follow one another during the formation of a nodule.

Polymetallic nodules

The mineral composition of manganese-bearing minerals is dependent on how the nodules are formed; sedimentary nodules, which have a lower Mn2+ content than diagenetic, are dominated by Fe-vernadite, Mn-feroxyhyte, and asbolane-buserite while diagenetic nodules are dominated by buserite I, birnessite, todorokite, and asbolane-buserite.[12] The growth types termed diagenetic and hydrogenetic reflect suboxic and oxic growth, which in turn could relate to periods of interglacial and glacial climate. It has been estimated that suboxic-diagenentic type 2 layers make up about 50–60% of the chemical inventory of the CCZ nodules whereas oxic-hydrogenetic type 1 layers comprise about 35–40%.The remaining part (5–10%) of the nodules consists of incorporated sediment particles occurring along cracks and pores.[13]

A wide range of trace elements and trace minerals are found in nodules with many of these incorporated from the seabed sediment, which itself includes particles carried as dust from all over the planet before settling to the seabed.[2]

Interest in the potential exploitation of polymetallic nodules generated a great deal of activity among prospective mining consortia in the 1960s and 1970s. Almost half a billion dollars was invested in identifying potential deposits and in research and development of technology for mining and processing nodules. These initial undertakings were carried out primarily by four multinational consortia composed of companies from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, Japan and two groups of private companies and agencies from France and Japan. There were also three publicly sponsored entities from the Soviet Union, India and China.

In the late-seventies, two of the international joint ventures succeeded in collecting several hundred ton quantities of manganese nodules from the abyssal plains (18,000 feet, 5.5 km + depth) of the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean.[9] Significant quantities of nickel (the primary target) as well as copper and cobalt were subsequently extracted from this "ore" using both pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods. In the course of these projects, a number of ancillary developments evolved, including the use of near-bottom towed side-scan sonar array to assay the nodule population density on the abyssal silt whilst simultaneously performing a sub-bottom profile with a derived, vertically oriented, low-frequency acoustic beam[citation needed].

The technology and experience developed during the course of this project were never commercialized because the last two decades of the 20th century saw an excess of nickel production. The estimated $3.5-billion (1978 US dollars) investment to implement commercialization was an additional factor. Sumitomo Metal Mining continues to maintain a small (place-keeping) organization in this field[citation needed].

Kennecott Copper had explored the potential profits in manganese nodule mining and found that it was not worth the cost. On top of the environmental issues and the fact that the profits had to be shared, there was no cheap way to get the manganese nodules off the sea floor.[citation needed]

By the time the International Seabed Authority was in place in 1994, interest in the extraction of nodules waned. Three factors were largely responsible:[citation needed]

Difficulty and expense of developing and operating mining technology that could economically remove the nodules from depths of five or six kilometers and transport them to the ocean surface

High taxes the international community would charge for the mining, and

Continuing availability of the key minerals from land-based sources at market prices.

At this time, the commercial extraction of polymetallic nodules was not considered likely to occur during the next two decades.[citation needed]

In recent times, nickel and other metal supply has needed to turn to higher cost deposits in order to meet increased demand, and commercial interest in nodules has revived. The International Seabed Authority has granted new exploration contracts and is progressing development of a Mining Code for The Area, with most interest being in the Clarion Clipperton Zone.[15]

Since 2011, a number of commercial companies have received exploration contracts these include subsidiaries of larger companies like Lockheed Martin, DEME, Keppel Corporation and China Minmetals and smaller companies like Nauru Ocean Resources Inc and Tonga Offshore Mining Limited.[9]

The renewed interest in mining nodules has led to increased concern and scrutiny regarding possible environmental impacts.

After the Second World War the United Nations started a lengthy process of developing international treaties that moved away from the then held concept of Freedom of the seas.

By 1972, the promise of nodule exploitation was one of the main factors that led developing nations to propose that the deep seabed beyond the limits of national jurisdiction should be treated as a “common heritage of mankind”, with proceeds to be shared between those who developed this resource and the rest of the international community. This initiative eventually resulted in the adoption (1982) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and after negotiation of Part XI by 1994, the establishment of the International Seabed Authority, with responsibility for controlling all deep-sea mining in international areas. The first legislative achievement of this intergovernmental organization was the adoption (2000) of regulations for prospecting and exploration for polymetallic nodules, with special provisions to protect the marine environment from any adverse effects. The Authority followed this up (2001-2002) by signing 15-year contracts with seven private and public entities, giving them exclusive rights to explore for nodules in specified tracts of the seabed, each 75,000 square kilometers in size. The United States, whose companies were among the key actors in the earlier period of exploration, remains outside this compact as a non-party to the Law of the Sea Convention[citation needed].

Per UNCLOS the Authority has four main functions. Essentially these are:

To administer the mineral resources of the seabed in the Area;

To enact rules, regulations and procedures relating to these resources;

To promote and encourage marine scientific research and development in the Area;

To protect and conserve the natural resources of the Area and prevent significant damage to the environment.

Currently the International Seabed Authority is defining and debating aspects of its Mining Code which encompasses Polymetallic Sulphides (Seafloor massive sulphide deposits) and Cobalt-Rich Crusts as well as Polymetallic Nodules. The Mining Code includes exploration and draft exploitation regulations, an Environmental Management Plan for the Clarion Clipperton Zone, and recommendations for the guidance of Contractors in terms of reporting, environmental impact assessment, expenditure reporting and training for scientists and engineers from developing nations.[16]

In addition to the Convention on Biological Diversity; on 19 June 2015 the General Assembly of the UN adapted resolution A/RES/69/292 - Development of an international legally-binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction.[17] This resolution calls for a PrepCom to be established to examine what this instrument could look like and what it would address specifically in addition to the existing environmental parts of UNCLOS. It would take into account the various reports of the Co-Chairs on the work of the relevant Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group. In due course an intergovernmental conference would review and debate the recommendations of the PrepCom.

Any future mining of nodules in The Area needs to be authorised by the International Seabed Authority and would need to quantify impact in advance via an Environmental impact statement and associated Environmental Management Plan. These assessments, monitoring plans and guidance controls would likely work at the scale of proposed operations.

The International Seabed Authority already has an Environmental Management Plan that considers the entire Clarion Clipperton Zone and that includes reference areas that are not available for mining (termed Areas of Particular Environmental Interest).[18]

Environmental assessments would need to have an unbiased scientific basis, and to account for:

the remote nature of the nodules making detailed data collection challenging;

the large variety in scale (e.g. sub decimeter nodule communities spread over thousands of kilometers) in terms of ecosystem function and biodiversity;

the severity and scale of local impacts (such as habitat removal, resedimentation).

Past environmental studies such as the Deep Ocean Mining Environmental Study (DOMES) and resultant Benthic Impact Experiments (BIE) concluded in part that trial mining at a reasonable scale would likely help best constrain real impacts from any commercial mining.[19]

Research shows that polymetallic nodule fields are hotspots of abundance and diversity for a highly vulnerable abyssal fauna.[20]Nodule mining could affect tens of thousands of square kilometers of these deep sea ecosystems. Nodule regrowth takes decades to millions of years and that would make such mining an unsustainable and nonrenewable practice. Any prediction about the effects of mining is extremely uncertain. Thus, nodule mining could cause habitat alteration, direct mortality of benthic creatures, or suspension of sediment, which can smother filter feeders.[21] Future environmental impact studies should address the impact on disruption and release of methane clathrate deposits in the deep oceans.[citation needed]