Allstate Life Insurance Company v. Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc., et al.

Filing
538

ORDER that the Underwriters may conduct discovery into communications between Allstate and/or Wells Fargo and their respective in-house or outside counsel. This discovery is limited to communications that relate to the bond offering at issue in this case and that occurred between June 1, 2008 and November 19, 2008. Any supplemental depositions conducted by the Underwriters are limited to two hours. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/7/2012. (KMG)

1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
)
)
)
)
In re: Allstate Life Insurance Company)
)
Litigation
)
)
)
)
)
)
Lead Case No. CV-09-8162-PCT-GMS
Consolidated with:
Case No. CV-09-8174-PCT-GMS
ORDER
15
16
Pending before the Court is the Underwriters’1 request to discover certain
17
communications between Allstate Life Insurance Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and their
18
respective counsel. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will allow the Underwriters
19
to conduct the requested discovery, subject to certain limitations.
20
Allstate and Wells Fargo have asserted a claim against several defendants, including
21
the Underwriters, pursuant to the Illinois Securities Law of 1953. They allege that these
22
defendants violated the Illinois Securities Law by making statements in connection with a
23
bond offering which omitted critical demographic information and were misleading. Any sale
24
of securities that violates the Illinois Securities Law of 1953 is voidable at the election of the
25
purchaser. See 815 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 5/13(A). Should the purchaser make this election,
26
27
1
28
The Underwriters are Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc., Southwest Securities Inc., and
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
1
however, he must do so “within 6 months after the purchaser shall have knowledge that the
2
sale of the securities to him or her is voidable.” 815 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 5/13(B). What a
3
party’s counsel knows “is imputed to his client.” Ansbro v. Southeast Energy Group, Ltd.,
4
658 F. Supp. 566, 572 (N.D.Ill.,1987). In this case, Allstate elected to rescind the Bonds on
5
May 18, 2009. Six months prior to May 18, 2009 was November 19, 2008. Whether Allstate
6
knew that the sale of securities was voidable prior to November 19, 2008 is therefore
7
material to its Illinois Securities Law claim.
8
Allstate asserts that it was not “aware of historic demographic information that was
9
not disclosed in the Official Statements” until December 2008 at the earliest, and that
10
therefore the Underwriters’ discovery request is “moot.” (Doc. 533 at 5). Allstate’s assertion
11
that it was not aware of this information until December of 2008, however, is precisely the
12
assertion that the Underwriters wish to refute using the requested discovery. Moreover, even
13
if Allstate did not formally receive the demographic information until December, there is
14
evidence that Allstate’s counsel was aware of the existence of this information well prior to
15
December, and may have been on inquiry notice that the Bonds were voidable. (Doc. 534 at
16
2–3). See Martin v. Orvis Bros. & Co., 25 Ill. App. 3d 238, 245–46 (1974) (stating that under
17
§ 5/13 “one who has sufficient knowledge to be put on inquiry cannot escape the
18
consequences of his knowledge by failing to make inquiry”). Because the Court does not
19
accept Allstate’s mootness argument, the Court will allow the Underwriters to conduct the
20
requested discovery, subject to the limitations stated below.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Underwriters may conduct discovery into
22
communications between Allstate and/or Wells Fargo and their respective in-house or outside
23
counsel. This discovery is limited to communications that relate to the bond offering at issue
24
in this case and that occurred between June 1, 2008 and November 19, 2008. Any
25
supplemental depositions conducted by the Underwriters are limited to two hours.
26
DATED this 7th day of August, 2012.
27
28
-2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.