Rove, Beck, Limbaugh, and OReilley

Rove thought for sure it was possible to buy his way for his crossroads...dang on dang, HE FAILED. now these rich people are crying because many lost a lot of millions.

You are all such bad sore loseres.

WE WON!!!!!!!it will be better than ever for us all. Because if working across the aisle does not work then we are doomed and not becuase OBAMA won, it will be because your party refueses work together.

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for
following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and
comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are
automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some
comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules,
click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

Aren't you the person that just told people "to play nice in the sandbox" in your last blog?
So in other words, you want to be able to run YOUR mouth, but you want others to be nice.
Typical.

I just watched O'Reilly lastnight and he said nothing about voter fraud GIM.
I listened to Rush today and he didn't mention it either.
Don't know about Beck and Rove, although Rove was on TV lastnight and I didn't hear him mention fraud at all.

Fraud was definately in play on election night (there are all kinds of examples in several states), and for some reason, the VAST MAJORITY of the fraud was put in place to help Obama - not Romney.
I wonder why that is?
However, fraud was not the reason Obama won the election.

Don't worry, we'll survive. At least we have the house and nearly half the senate to stop the socialist efforts of the libs.

We older Republicans can remember JFK and the Democratic congress. We lived through Johnson and a Democratic congress that really started the entitlements and more progressive legislation. We remember Carter and a Democratic congress that increased the lib movement even more when they started the CRA and the risky loan business that has resulted in the housing bubble burst starting in 2007.

So we know the patterns of the libs and it became even more so under Obama.

So as McConnell was quoted, we will not roll over and play dead. We are a part of this nation and will have our say. We will do what we can to keep the libs from ruining this nation with their encouraging more and more dependence on government and zealous spending that would bankrupt us.

And we look forward to 2016 when we will run another candidate. Obama will not have anyone to blame but himself for his flaws and be sure that we will be right here to let you know about them.

Maybe by then some of those independents who thought the ACA would GIVE them health insurance will find out that they will actually have to pay for it or be penalized. And many of those seniors will find out that Obamacare actually means longer waiting lines as doctors and hospitals drop out from Medicare.

Longer lines will not affect me because I have a PPO plan which is an Advantage plan, so it makes up the difference in what Medicare doesn't pay, so I will keep my doctor even if he drops out of Medicare. But lots of lower income seniors can't afford the higher PPO premiums and have to wait in lines and maybe even drive out of town for care. Let's see how Obama will, spin that.

Correct heron.
What many liberals fail to see are the unintended consequences that come when the federal government throws it's weight around in the private sector. Now that Obama was re-elected and Obamacare will be shoved down our throats in full force, wait and see what that does to the private sector and the costs consumers pay for their goods and services. The cost of health care has gone UP, not down as Obama promised. Doctors are talking about cutting out medicare patients. I just heard that The Olive Garden is looking at cutting their employees hours down to 29 and basically making everyone part-time to get out of Obamacares rules. Stuff like that will spread across the Nation as businesses figure out ways to cut costs.
Liberal ideas are formed to make people "feel good", and think that liberals care for their fellow man.
Liberal ideas are actually formed to buy votes and the consequences be damned.

Instead of drinking your brew as many libs did during the Bush years and the GOP congress under Clinton, my strategy is to have patience. As I said, I have seen worse when JFK, Johnson and Carter were in and they had Democratic congresses.

The pendulum swings in both directions, so laugh it up while Obama is trying to over ride the GOP house. In 2016, the pendulum will swing back to the GOP after the independents see 4 years of gridlock.

As for Obamacare, SCOTUS gave states many options and many will bow out of Obamacare including SC. Some predict many parts of Obamacare will be dust in the red states.

Washington Times reports that the fallout over the election is beginning. Companies in blue states that will likely keep Obamacare are now telling employees many will be laid off soon as a result of the increased costs due to increased costs. They either have to lay off employees or move to a red state that will opt out. Either way, it will have a negative effect on the economy which has had a weak recovery anyway. Look for another recession in 2013 and 2014..

On top of that heron, people forget about all of the taxes Obamacare raises. That will be passed on to consumers.
Add those tax increases to the fact that Obama came out today and says he "has a mandate" for raising taxes because of his re-election. Yep, business will be ready to hire ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE in the next 4 years! LOL

Far Left loons like Obama that have no business experience at all, always look at taxes in a stagnant way instead of a dynamic way. They think raising taxes on the so called "rich" (that happens to include over a million small businesses) will increase revenue.
Doesn't happen that way (in fact it usually results in LESS revenue).
The tax increase Obama wants to pass won't fund the federal government for a week, yet he (and his friends in the MSM) are acting like it will solve our fiscal problems.
That's BS. It's nothing but class warfare, and the Left knows it.
Today, Obama was once again trying to run on Clinton's record. He said he wanted to take the top income tax brackets and raise them to levels under Clinton, and that THAT'S how we balanced the budget in the 1990's.
That's not how we balanced the budget.
When Clinton raised taxes he offset them by dramatically lowering the capital gains tax rate.
Obama wants to RAISE cap gains tax rates.
We also lowered spending and passed welfare reform, led by Newt Gingrich and the Contract With America.
We also had a Technology bubble that led to a economic boom, which is the TRUE way of raising revenue.
You create an atmosphere that invigorates the economy, and you create more jobs which creates more taxpayers.

We had record revenue to the Treasury for several years under Bush AFTER he cut taxes. That's because it spurred economic growth, created more taxpayers, and that led to a vibrant economy.
Everything Obama wants to do will kill jobs / economy......and the worst part is, he thinks he has a "mandate" to do it.
Sorry MR........but I think I'm going to pray for our country.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "It's like the president's not our boyfriend anymore," Joan McCarter, an editor at the Daily Kos website

I received an email a couple of days ago from my company's insurance that my insurance cost will go up 6.3% next year with more out of pocket cost benefits. That will negate my raise, if my company can afford it. Thank you obama care!

RH- Um, I think the point is, Obama said health insurance premiums would go DOWN (he claimed by $2500.00) if Obamacare was passed.
Instead, people have watched their premiums go UP - which is the exact opposite of what Obama promised.
But he breaking promises and making false claims isn't anything new, now is it.

I'm probably the oldest person on the forum and I can honestly say this was the most divided election I've ever seen.

Gentlelovedman is a hypocrite. He is making fun of conservatives and we are the ones who built this country. We believe in families, churches, good manners, honest work ethics and love of country above all.

My people and immigrants of my parents time stood proudly and saluted our flag and sang our national anthem unlike many in schools who refuse to slute our flag or sing the national anthem. In fact they sit in school while others stand. Is this what the Democrats of today want? I believe they do.

It would have been unthinkable for my family to ask for a hand-out. Welfare? That was for lazy people and not for God fearing America loving people.

So Getle man whomever you are in my eyes you suck. You are a traitor to your beloved country and should move because you hate anybody who doesn't agree with you.

Actually welfare started under Johnson with his War on Poverty and War on Hunger. We never had government subsistence before that and poverty was a word in the dictionary. Sure we had poor people before that, but no one went hungry. All able bodied people worked even if it was a low skilled pay.

We had soup kitchens and charitable organizations helping people in need. And now after 50 years and billions of dollars and fraud, we still have soup kitchens and charitable organizations helping people in need.

Yes heron...........................but liberals get to feel good about themselves and pretend they know best by spending all of those billions (actually TRILLIONS) on all of their government programs.
All these government programs have done is jack up taxes, jack up prices on goods and services, and create a dependency / entitlement society that this country cannot afford, and will never recover from.

My health insurance premium WENT DOWN!!!!!
I'm being 100% completely honest.
My policy automatically re-newed in October at an increase, so I started shopping around. Well, I found a less expensive policy ($50 a month cheaper than I had been paying before the re-newal) with a different carrier that included PREVENTATIVE doctor visits (check-ups, immunizations, etc. ) My old policy didn't have that. So I called my old carrier to see what I had to do to cancel. They talked me into starting a NEW policy with them, not a re-newal of the old one. The NEW policy includes preventative, too. Why? OBAMACARE! And their rate was $100 less than my original policy. Wow.
I was so happy, I decided to re-finance my house too. Thanks to Obama's new HARP program, I am able to re-fi and save $200 a month!
And did I mention I got back $600 a few months ago from my health insurance company because of Obamacare?
That's a grand total of $4200 extra bucks in my pocket in 1 year.
You guys can ramble on all you want with your "predictions" of what is "going to be", but I'll stick with facts and my checkbook :)

So, your plan INCREASED, and then after you called them it went DOWN? LOL.
It didn't go down because of Obamacare MR. It went down to keep your business.
That's called competition.
But how is it that YOU are the only person that I have ever talked to who's health care premiums have gone DOWN?
I asked my insurance carrier for a different policy after mine went up and they had no such "cheaper" plan due to Obamacare. To get a cheaper plan, I had to up my deductible.
I also shopped around and found that nobody else was offering anything better. You must have some fly-by-night, online carrier who doesn't care what they charge because they know they will be out of business when the health care law fully kicks in anyway.
And BTW, my plan includes "preventative" too. Always has, and it had nothing to do with Obamacare.

And I'm sorry to hear that you needed a government program to help you refinance your home. Gosh, I went and refinanced my home a long time ago all by my little self.
Do you need someone to hold your hand when you go to the store too?
Only 25% of mortgages in the US are eligible for refinancing under HARP. You must really have problems. :-(
I hope your property value didn't decline TOO much Missy! Ouch!
Loans MUST be owned by Fannie or Freddie and must have been sold to them by May 2009 to qualify for HARP. Also, the LTV (loan to value) must be greater than 80%.
I wouldn't have qualified under HARP for those 2 reasons alone. I don't owe that much on my house and my mortgage is through a Credit Union.
Besides, HARP interest rates are usually higher than what you could get if you refinance on your own, so those of us that don't need government to hold our hand got a better rate anyway. ;-)

Good luck Missy.
Hey, if you ask, maybe Obama will come out and mow your lawn too!
Or at least he could send someone out with a government check to help you pay for it. ;-)

Both banks are government banks and shows the DEPENDENCE of many citizens on government handouts. Private banks borrow and pay back, like in the Bush TARP, but government banks make up losses with grants from the taxpayers. HARP is another government program that will cause losses to the quarterly statements, but no worry, as long as we have Obama, taxpayer money will continue to rescue the Socialist Bank of Amerika while private banks will try to compete with them.

As one regulator said, "The regulator for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae last week predicted the two firms' cumulative net costs to U.S. taxpayers will be $121 billion to $193 billion through 2014, with future dividend payments taken into account."

MR, welcome to our tax money. Meanwhile our debt and deficit spending increase each year under Obama. By 2016, the US will be along with Spain, Italy and Greece with high inflation and huge debt issues. We will probably also have at least one more credit downgrade, possibly two making the US a credit risk among nations. Welcome to Obama land.

Did everyone hear about the big Left-wing wacko meeting that was held today at the White House? I guess it didn't take Obama long to round up the troops after the election.
Representatives from Moveon.org were there, along with Center for American Progress, and several Union leaders.
I can't wait to find out what they were there to cook up.

I'm sure Obama gave them all a big "Thank you" in helping him spread the left-wing lies during the election.
And I'm sure they all had their hands out wanting some form of pay-back.
Gotta love it.

The fact that you would find humor in your assumption that I "really must have problems" is pretty pathetic. But I guess that's the Republican way nowadays.
The fact is... I don't know yet if I will qualify for HARP. My loan was bought out by CitiMortgage years ago, and it is FannyMae. But they just did the appraisal on Friday last week, so I don't know yet if the LTV is greater than 80%. But I am actually doubtful. My mortgage is $365, but the house was last appraised at $740. The county has it appraised at $900 for tax purposes, which I have recently fought and it dropped to $750.
Even if I don't fall into the HARP program, I'll be able to re-fi at 3.75% With Harp it was 3.55%. So not much of a difference but it was worth a try. Either way, I'm going to be in better shape than I was before this mess started. And would it make me a terrible person if my house value dropped that much in the past 7 years and I DO qualify for HARP? Would that be my negligence?

Would you prefer that those 25% of homeowners in the US that qualify for HARP shouldn't try to save their homes? Would you rather see them all foreclose? Would that help our economy? Would that make you laugh and gloat? Interesting that you would want your own investment to sink just to see others suffer. (More foreclosures=less value of YOUR property).

As for our health insurance, THANK YOU for admitting I was RIGHT!!! LOL! I said a long time ago that the new healthcare program would lead to more competition, and therefore reduced premiums. And I was correct (at least according to you!).
The rates automatically go up every year no matter what insurance company you have and no matter what the circumstances are. It's automatic and always has been. My rate increase had nothing to do with the healthcare law. And when I looked around, I found many new policies that were a LOT better than my old one and CHEAPER. (I now don't have to meet my deductible to get preventative care). The first one I was going to go with was BlueCross/Blue Shield. Yeah- one of those "fly-by-night" companies LOL!. The one I stayed with was with Assurant (The only company State Farm will sell- because they are so highly rated). And my deductable is $500 less than before. And I have no more life-time maximum of a million (considering my daughter's first 2 surgeries cost $250,000, I have to take that into consideration).

So I'm overall in a much better position. Thanks to new laws that help PEOPLE. Not Companies.
I guess you think that companies are the only ones who should be able to take advantage of government programs and monetary incentives. Sure- let them have tax breaks! Let them ignore enviromental protection! Don't inspect their labs and factories! Don't regulate their business practices! So what if we don't protect our citizens? They are all a bunch of morons anyway!
What you forget is that it is OUR money that pays for those programs! Will you decline Social Security benefits when you can qualify for them? I sure hope so. Otherwise you'll prove yourself to be a hypocrite.

Dixie- Bush started the cell phone program. Go complain to him.

CG- Ever wonder what kind of "pay-back" Romney's big donors would have been asking for if he had won the election?

MR- I wasn't laughing when I said "you really must have problems". I said I was sorry to hear that.
But, I'm laughing NOW.
Why?
Because your so called "facts" just came back to bite you in the arse.
In your previous post you said that you had refinanced through HARP. You even gloated about how much money you were saving. Now you are saying that you don't know if you qualify.
So in other words, it was all BS.

Nothing wrong with people refinancing MR. I did it a long time ago.
What I am saying is, you don't need a government program to do it.
In fact, the rules for refinancing under HARP say that you MUST be current on your mortgage. That's the same qualification as most banks. So, these people you speak of that are "in trouble", behind on their mortgages, and may end up losing their homes to foreclosure won't get help from HARP anyway.
And YES, weeding these people out through a foreclosure process WOULD be good for our economy. We had several foreclosures in our neighborhood and that did indeed hurt our home values. However, once the foreclosures were weeded out, our values began to increase.
Same thing will happen on a National level.

As for health care, rates automatically go up on A LOT of things every year MR. The reason rates go up on health care is because of price increases in the medical industry, and a lot of those price increases are due to government intervention / regulation, legal action, costs of products / medical devices going up, the costs of doctors malpractice insurance going up, etc....etc.....
What would have lead to "more competition" in the health insurance industry would have been to allow people to purchase health insurance across state lines (a republican idea). Obamacare will not lead to more competition......Obamacare was developed to lead to the DESTRUCTION of insurance companies (down the road) so that people only have 1 place to go for their health care needs: The Federal Government.
Even Barney Frank admitted that.

What you are witnessing now is the result of a carefully laid out plan to purposefully have most of the more popular provisions in Obamacare come out first (and before the election). I told you and everyone else that a long time ago.
People are HAPPY that they can't be turned down for pre-existing conditions. People are HAPPY they can keep their deadbeat child on their plan until they are 26 (and still living in the basement). People are HAPPY because it looks like someone is taking those dastardly ol insurance companies to task.
Problem is, this is just the very beginning of the health care law. Most things (like all the tax increases, the new rules and regulations, the formation of over 100 new government agencies - including the death panel, etc) don't kick in until 2014............and that was DONE ON PURPOSE.
You just aren't bright enough to figure it out my dear.
And unfortunately, much of America is right there with you buying into Obama's BS like bears to honey.

Ahhhhh.............liberals sure have done a good job to dumbing down the electorate.
Gotta give them that,

BTW, why are you going around trying to save a couple hundred bucks on your health care plan when Obama said that premiums would go down by $2500.00 when Obamacare passed?
You may want to talk to your President about that.

The only reason mortgage rates are low is because the Federal Reserve is keeping the prime rates low in a feeble attempt to help the economy. This has nothing to do with Obama since it is a strategy used by the fed every time the economy is weak.

Many people are financing because of the low rates, not because of HARP or Obama. And the HARP dies not help people near foreclosure because one requirement is that payments are up to date and not behind.

Health insurance rates will continue to rise as medical costs rise. This is a no brainer. It happened with our homeowners insurance along the coast because of hurricane damage threats. Besides, how can Obamacare create more competition than already existed? Actually the low prime rates are the reasons policies can come down since they invest in a diversified portfolio including CDs to maintain cash flow.

Since Obamacare is the law of the land, states now have to obey the law. Gov Rick Scott will now try to obey the law since we have one year to prepare for it. They have to decide whether to set up a state exchange or go with the fed.

My view is that many red states will be setting up state exchanges since that gives them more control.

"I was so happy, I decided to re-finance my house too. Thanks to Obama's new HARP program, I am able to re-fi and save $200 a month!"
That's the offer that was made to me by my lender. I didn't say I DID re-fi, just that I was able to. Which is the presumption based on my type of loan and the market today. Not sure if it will happen- but the offer stirred me to make a move either way.

Once the forclosures are weeded out things will get better? They will just keep coming without some type of intervention, CG.

Health care- More "what-ifs" is all you can offer. Ummmmm.... ok. Hard to argue with that. We'll just have to wait a couple more years until I am once again proven right.
And now you are saying that if a child is born with congenital defects, they have no right to health insurance and they are deadbeats if they stay on their parents plan after the age of 18? Okay then. Welcome to the world of "family values" in a Republican's mind.

As for why I chose to get a new health plan now? Try reading my original post again. (Gee- talk about "dumbing-down". You failed in Reading Comprehension, didn't you cg?)

I almost forgot...................
How many times are you libs (like MR) going to accuse people who collect Soc Sec of being hypocrites, and how many times do we conservatives (like me) have to point out to you that Soc Sec is a different situation - and WHY it's different?
Now I know why you libs always fall for the Left's BS. You can't recall history!

Yes MR, I WILL collect Soc Sec when I am ready to.
And NO, that doesn't make me a hypocrite.

I have paid a large chunk of my income towards Soc Sec my entire working life (in fact I pay DOUBLE Soc Sec for being self employed) and I plan on collecting when I retire.
A hypocrite would be someone who opted out of paying into the program (if that was allowed) and then decided they wanted to try and collect it anyway.

Is there any other BS you want to throw around today?
Don't tell me............you saved thousands of dollars on your car purchase because of the cash for clunkers program, only to find out later that you weren't sure if you qualified or not. LOL
Hope you haven't spent all those "thousands" of dollars in your "checkbook" yet MR! Better wait and see if you actually qualify first!! ROFL!!!!

Health care is just like house insurance? Our rates rise every year because of our location and the possibility of a hurricaine? Yet- we have had no such storm is decades!!! And you think that's just the way it should be?
Obamacare brings more competition because it brings more clients. Why do you think Lowes moves in right across the street from Home Depot every time one opens up?

HARP does help those people who owe more than their house is worth Heron. And getting out from under is a huge step towards recovery.

Yes, those were my words exactly, weren't they MR.
"And now you are saying that if a child is born with congenital defects, that they have no right to health insurance and they are deadbeats...."
A child with a defect is not a "deadbeat". A deadbeat is someone who gives no effort in life, thus my comment about living in their parents basement until they are 26.
A child born with a defect or a disability of some type is entirely different. And, there are/were already ALL KINDS of programs put in place, from both private and public money, to help with disabled children and adults - LONG before Obamacare came around.

And why should taxpayers "intervene" on foreclosures? Why should taxpayers be held responsible for paying someone's mortgage? We already have Section 8 housing at taxpayers expense. We already have bankruptcy procedures in place for people who need to take that route. People who made poor decisions on buying something they couldn't afford should NOT be bailed out by the federal government / taxpayers and allowed to stay in a home they never should have purchased in the first place.
Show me in the Constitution where it says people have a "right" to stay in a house they can't afford. Show me in the Constitution where it says it's the responsibility of the federal government to provide housing (or a lower interest rate) to people that made poor decisions.

Nothing wrong with MY reading skills MR. You purposely tried to make people think that you "saved and extra $4200 bucks in 1 year" and that you did so DUE TO GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS.
Now you are saying that you don't even know if you qualify.

I read just fine, but perhaps your communication skills need a little work.
Either that, or just lay off pushing the BS.

One reason for the rise in coastal insurance is the explosion of buildings built along the coast. Every available beach site now is plastered with homes and many are expensive homes. 50 years ago, there were only a few homes here in SC and they were real beach homes, not mansions. Homes along Myrtle Beach and around the barrier islands in Charleston were simple temporary frame homes designed for a week end get away. Hilton Head had no beach homes because there was no bridge. Daufuskie was a rural barrier island with less than a hundred residents.

Now look at the homes along the beach on Hilton Head, Tybee Island, Sullivan's Island and Myrtle Beach. Most are a million dollars or more. No wonder insurance has gone up after the major hurricanes after Andrew in Florida and those following.

As for more clients, that is a pipe dream. Libs spout the increased clients with mandatory insurance which hasn't happened and may not at all if the IRS doesn't enforce the law in 2015. The IRS says it will not hire additional workers to enforce the law. Add to that the loss of clients from businesses laying off workers because of Obamacare. To paraphrase, "Where's the clients?"

On top of that heron, you don't get "more competition" through an increase in clients / shoppers, as MR suggests. You get more competition by an increase of providers / insurance companies, and that would have happened if people would have been allowed to shop insurance companies across state lines - as the republicans wanted. That would have opened up a HUGE market of insurance providers, but no..............liberals want it so there is eventually only ONE place to get your health care from.
The Government.

And MR, my point in asking you why you were shopping for a new insurance provider was simple. If Obama had been telling us the truth when he stated premiums would go down by $2500.00 when Obamacare was passed, then you wouldn't HAVE to be shopping around for a cheaper plan. But alas, it was just another liberal lie to get people to buy into the program........
I guess that went right over head (not surprisingly).

You say all I offer are more "what if's" regarding the fallout over the health care law MR?
We need to "wait a couple years" before YOU are proven right??

Well, how about some "What IS".
And we don't even have to wait ONE year until I'M proven right Missy.

Businesses are coming out right NOW (not 2 years from now) explaining how they are going to either have to cut back on employees, cut back on employees hours, cut back on raises, charge their employees more for the health care, or charge their customers more for the goods and services they provide.........all because of obamacare.

This is what happens when we have a far-left loon, community organizer, with no business experience what-so-ever running this country. These are the hidden cost increases (just like raising taxes) that everyone (including the middle class that liberals say they want to protect) ends up paying whenever the government starts a new "program" or shoves it's nose into the private sector on a "do good" mission.
I think after 4 years of failed left-wing policies, we can officially call this the Obama recession.

Charities and soup kitchens are helping people you say. What I see is people who are welfare getting free handouts. The Greenery employees are always in line on wensdaysat the church in Bluffton, and those folks have a job, thats just wrong. I see people in stores buying groceries with EBT cards, then I see them in line at the churches. I see people buying cigars, cigarattes and beer but I see the same people in line at the churches soup kitchens. Face it people, is this really helping or hindering? Is this help really going to people in need or people taking advantage of bleeding hearts?

No doubt there is some abuse in the soup kitchens, but most people would not be in that line unless they needed it. The abusers are not too proud to eat free food, but they are a minority. (no pun intended). It would be difficult to check out each person in line, because not all would have a Food Stamp card and some are in temporary need.

As for charity, most churches now coordinate with the local Social Services office for cash help. Anyone coming into our church asking for money will be asked to go to the SS office and have them verify their economic status. If the office says they are in poverty, we still do not give cash. For a local, they get a 25 dollar food certificate good at one of the participating food markets. The food market honors our certificate and sends us a bill with the numbered certificate. It is good only for food items and nothing else. We will give a second certificate if they are still in need, but any after that is at the discretion of our minister. The only family to ask for more was a poor family who's house burned and they were on SS benefits and no other income.

For a need to get back home and they are short of cash, we give them McDonalds certificates, usually 20 bucks a person and a certificate for a fill up up to 50 dollars at one of the local gas stations for gas only. For most cars that is a fill up that will give them about 400 miles.

One of the ministers on Hilton Head quipped that at his church, the typical person is a laid off roofer that wants to go back to New Jersey.

I stilll continue to hear B.O say we will not raise taxes on the middle class. Really? What are the new health care taxes doing? Isn't the middle class creators of small businesses? If I am missing something please elaborate.

Dems raise taxes on businesses and they have to pass on the extra expense in their selling price. Rather than saying they didn't raise the taxes, they smile while businesses become the new tax collector and laugh when consumers blame the businesses for higher prices. Even Barnum and Bailey never tried that trick to fool people.

Comments are welcome, so long as they are civil. A Facebook account is required. Abuse may result in the commenter being permanently blocked. Personal attacks are strictly prohibited. We reserve the right to remove any comments at any time.