Except for manhood, which you ask readers to "imagine"--is a weak parallel. It would be closer to liken it to "Vote like your man parts depend on it."

Of course, it's dumb to imagine either. Because unlike women, man don't have to deal with a political party trying to dictate to them, what to do with their parts. But you knew that. "Social liberal" that you are.

Well, there does seem to be a political party that stands against the manhood to which I was raised. And it ain't the Republicans. Of course that same party is against the womanhood in chich my wife and daughter were raised.

We're amputating perfectly normal, healthy, functional tissue -- it has to be like that, to be sold like this for research or manufacturing purposes -- from baby boys and then selling it on the open market.

You can't make this stuff up. It's beyond dystopian. It's the modern-day minor version of Moloch worship.

It's the sexual tissue of our own children, being sold on the open market.

We've already industrially commoditized man parts. We strap baby boys down and cut off their erogenous flesh and process it and resell it to researchers and manufacturers.

Given the church’s history of political activism, and Romney’s prominent role in the church, it seems bizarre that he’s yet to address the issue at all—a perverse instance of religious tolerance leaving questions about gender discrimination unasked and unexamined.

But "the church’s history of political activism" doesn't indicate they're playing an angle with Romney, even though the cultists were "reportedly using its religious authority to tell the faithful which side to take in a local zoning fight" and "That [black] curse was lifted by a new divine revelation in 1978, serendipitously received just as the political pressure on the church had become crushing."

Listen up, Suckers:

"I would like to know just how different his views are from those of the now-deceased Hinckley, whom Romney spoke with privately—reportedly about “whether a run would be good for him and the church”—before launching his first presidential bid in 2008."

Yeah, he asked about that - and many other things - but he won't ask church leadership about anything else,...promise. And then there's this:

Marion G. Romney—a first cousin of George who was a former member of the First Presidency of the Church, its highest authority—famously related the instructions he’d received from the Mormon prophet:

“Always keep your eye on the president of the church, and if he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you do it, the Lord will bless you for it.”

At a temple endowment ceremony held before my wedding, I was given a new name that I was to tell no one but my spouse so that he could call me by it and pull me through a semi-sheer veil (a curtain really) in an act that supposedly represented my path to salvation. Yet my husband was expressly forbidden from telling me his new name.

Lets face it the president is surrounded by dipshits like himself. They don't really understand why people are offended by this ad, they really don't. They took it down because someone had to explain it to them and they want to snow the gullible one last time. Duh.

"The liberal womans' openly stated obsessions with their genitalia is fascinating to watch, seeing as how it's men that are supposed to have the "phallus=identity=power" issues."

I think you've figured it out. It's nothing but old fashioned penis envy.

I'd like to see a cartoon that has a woman on it and one speech bubble says, "I want to be appreciated for my brain." and then on the other side and below is another speech bubble that says, "My vagina is voting for Obama."

Cartoon idea: a voter drawing their hand away from the cast vote button, and there is a string of cooter mucus between their hand and the button. Callout thought bubble reads, "I hate voting after a Vaj Voter!"

Speaking of lady parts -- this is gross, you have been warned. Stop reading this now. OK, now that the disclaimer has been issued: I squeezed cheese out of my nipple...ewww! That breast had the breast cancer. Should I be worried? Had a mammogram recently. ????

Because real women know every doctor is a dirty capitalist monster who's just waiting for a chance to steal your labia and lock you into a chastity belt.Whereas faceless unelected government functionaries are obviously worthy of your unconditional trust.

The arrogance of the Obamites is amazing, but the awful thing is that they have the dipshit twiffle female vote that thinks with their hormones and cunts locked up, blacls that vote in skin color locked up, all the Obamaphone momma parasites vote locked up.

And all the liberals and progressive Jewish puppetmasters in the media...that will ballwash Obama day in and day out no matter what he says or does or fails to do. They are expiating their immense white guilt for basically nothing any white should feel guilty of. Even liberals and progressive Jews who had ancestors in the slavery business.

So the Obamites can get get away with it. NO lie is called out. No mockery of slowing the oceans rise, healing the planet, his Harvard lawyer mob trying to do energy tech startups.....no mockery of the Obamite's version of the US flag.

And No mockery of the single white sparkle cows that need a wise strong sweet-talking black pimp that will protect their lady parts from those awful white Christianists.(We know how well the actual white whore-black pimp relationship usually works out)

2nd Your premise lacks both insight and wisdom. Let me use the overused, overblown analogy: Out of the 2 statements “Vote German because they know what to do with the Jews” and “Vote Jew because they know what to do with the Germans”. Second slogan is less ‘creepy’ because let’s face it Germans took care of a lot of jewish people.

Women’s rights in the US were not equivalent to what happened with the Germans but to act like there isn’t sexism is simply ignorant. Let’s keep in mind that women weren’t allowed to vote in national elections until 1953. ( Local elections 1947’ish’). Let alone part of the work force.

3rd Shouting Thomas: Re: Women’s entitlement: “You must get laid like never” Re: Your abortion views: No there is only 2 people involved with abortion. The woman and the man. And really the man’s opinion is to be taken into consideration.

It is the woman who has to carry it, who also take the risk of losing her own life. Has to deal with the social repercussions of the pregnancy. Because all you holy christians like to disown your daughters when they have that moment of weakness and give in to biological urges with the person they feel is the ‘one’ and the only tool that was given to them was just say ‘no’.

And to the people that state abortions are ‘a matter of convenience’. As a male who has had been with a woman that has had an an abortion there is nothing convenient about it. It is emotionally the same as a miscarriage.

I saw this as mainly a youth thing - egalitarian even. In the last 10-15 years or so, parents en masse began calling genitalia "girl parts" and "boy parts" - those kids have grown up now. It's "lady parts" and "lady boner" and all that.

Does this fear mongering on the official campaign page equate to the fear mongering by Rush about the Obama phone woman, which so quickly turned you against all conservatism on the basis of what you read between the lines?

Absolutely no subtlety here: Evil Republicans (TM) want to mess with your vagina! And you accuse Romney of a sickening use of fear? For something Rush said (but not really, you inferred it, perhaps justifiably).

If an "undecided" such as yourself can be so easily swayed against Romney and not disgusted by this, then it's going to be a long four years.

"Speaking of lady parts -- this is gross, you have been warned. Stop reading this now. OK, now that the disclaimer has been issued: I squeezed cheese out of my nipple...ewww! That breast had the breast cancer. Should I be worried? Had a mammogram recently. ????"