Timothy Shriver's Washington Post article, Can the pope restore the purity of Catholicism? is
a wonderful and insightful piece - except for the title. It assumes
that Catholicism has had "purity" for a long time. It hasn't.
Catholicism has always been too complex for "purity" of any sort. Ever
since the official acceptance of Christianity by Rome (313 CE), The
Church has been a curious mixture of conflicting doctrines, artistic
beauty, money, immense power, sincere faith and corruption. And perhaps
in no other person are those qualities more evident than in pope
Benedict XVI. To this man, change in the Church is anathema: Pious XII
was his inspiration and John XXIII his enemy.

- Advertisement -

That
is why his supporters in the latest news about the on-going scandal of
sexual abuse have a tough time convincing people that he is not
culpable. Take Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal:

Let
me repeat that: The press has been the best friend of the Catholic
Church on the scandals because it exposed the story and made the church
face it. The press forced the church to admit, confront and attempt to
redress what had happened. The press forced them to confess. The press
forced the church to change the old regime and begin to come to terms
with the abusers...Without this pressure...the church would most likely
have continued to do what it has done for half a century, which is look
away, hush up, pay off and transfer.

I agree wholeheartedly. Then why would Noonan come up with this statement:

- Advertisement -

The
most reliable commentary on Pope Benedict's role in the scandals came
from John Allen of the National Catholic Reporter, who argues that once
Benedict came to fully understand the scope of the crisis, in 2003, he
made the church's first real progress toward coming to grips with it.

"Fully understand the scope of thecrisis." The PRESS
made Ratzinger understand. No one else did. Sheer conjecture but still
valid: IF the press had not capitalized on the scandal, would Ratzinger
have continued the old game of "pass the pedaphile priest"??

Come
on, Peggy, Ratzinger knew about the abuse long before 2003; he had
resources at his command to find out minute details about every priest
in the Catholic Church. A hint of heresy never got past him and neither
did a hint of sexual abuse. It's sheer idiocy to think that he knew
nothing. And with that knowledge he doth sinned in doing nothing.

And there are Catholic leaders - like Bill Donohue of The Catholic League - think that the press is evil, comparing the "persecution" of Catholicism to anti-Semitism! His own lame response to the scandal:

On March 30, 2010, Donohue appeared on CNN's Larry King Live
as part of a panel discussing sexual abuse of children by priests.
Donohue blamed the decades-old problem on gay priests, claiming they
could not be considered pedophiles because most of the offenses
involved "post-pubescent" boys (defined in the interview as boys
12-years-old or older) and were thus "homosexual" acts.

Holy twisted reasoning!!

The
Catholic Church (indeed, American Christianity as a whole) is infamous
for not admitting culpability in past misdeeds. If Pious XII had
admitted that he could have spoken out during the Holocaust would he
still be (fast-tracked) on the road to canonization? If the Vatican
would have voiced regret for its role in the Crusades and the expulsion
of Moors from Spain and Portugal, would the radical Muslim world have
as much animosity for Christianity as it does today?

As
recently as the 1980s and 1990s, the media has forced the Catholic
Church to admit to heinous acts against children: the Duplessis Orphan
scandal in Canada and the Magdalene Laundry scandal in Ireland. In both
cases, nuns were the perpetrators of torture, slavery, sexual abuse and
even homicide over a period of decades. And the Church did more than
simply cover up the bodies and place them in unmarked graves.

Rev. Dan Vojir is has been writing/blogging on religion and politics for the better part of ten years. A former radio talk show host (Strictly Books " Talk America Radio Network) and book publisher, Dan has connected with some of the most (more...)

"Fascinating, eye-opening, and extraordinary, Rob Kall's Bottom Up: Tapping the Power of the Connection Revolution explores the emerging paradigm of our age -- bottom-up thinking -- connecting an enormous range of disciplines and topics from systems, chaos, and complexity theories to the evolving role of technology in our lives. Not merely a cogent exposition of contemporary thinking, however, Bottom Up extrapolates from abstract ideas to derive practical, everyday steps we can take to improve our chances of global survival, peace, and prosperity. Following Rob's lead, we can change habits as individuals to deepen our connection with others across the planet."

Wendell Potter, former health insurance executive, co-author of Nation on the Take: How Big Money Corrupts Our Democracy and What We Can Do About It, and Founder of Tarbell.org

Author Mark Taliano combines years of research with on-the-ground observations to present an informed and well-documented analysis that refutes the mainstream media narrative.