Contractor Did Not Misrepresent Solvency of Owner to Subcontractor

A pay-if-paid clause in a subcontract was enforceable in spite of the subcontractor’s contention that the prime contractor misrepresented the identity and solvency of the project owner. The sub had the independent means of determining that information and was not fraudulently induced into the subcontract.

The Construction Claims Advisor summary of this case is available to ConstructionPro Network members and includes:

The citation for the case (case name, case number, and date filed)

An overview of the case

Background information about the case

A summary of the ruling

A summary of the court’s conclusion and the resulting outcome

Editor's commentary

A link to the complete PDF copy of the original opinion

NOT YET A SUBSCRIBER?

Purchase a Subscription
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access