On March 11, the former Serbian leader and president
of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milosevic, died in his prison cell at the Hague,
where he had been on trial for four years and one month for war crimes and
genocide. The Serbian Socialist Party leader Zoran Andelkovic responded
to the news of Milosevic's death with the following statement:

"Slobodan Milosevic, the president of the Socialist
Party of Serbia and a former president of Serbia and Yugoslavia was murdered
today at the Tribunal in Hague. The decision of the Tribunal to disallow
Milosevic's medical treatment at the Bakunin Institute in Moscow represents
a prescribed death sentence against Milosevic. Truth and justice were on
his side and this is why they have used a strategy of gradual killing of
Slobodan Milsosevic. The responsibility for his death is clearly with the
Hague Tribunal."

A partisan accusation or the truth? Milosevic was known
to be seriously ill. The Russian government promised to return Milosevic
to the Tribunal after treatment. The Tribunal refused. It is easy to conclude
that the case against Milosevic had collapsed and that an embarrassed US
government, NATO authorities, and Hague Tribunal decided to let him die
in his cell rather than admit that his guilt could not be proven even after
a trial lasting four years and one month.

Milosevic was caught up in the post-Soviet era break-up
of Yugoslavia. Nationalist forces broke up the Yugoslav federation. During
1991-92, Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina seceded from
Yugoslavia. Large Serbian minorities in Croatia and in Bosnia objected and
claimed the identical right of self-determination to remain in the federation
as Croats and Muslims claimed to leave it. Croatian and Bosnian Serbs organized
and a war against secession began.

Milosevic could hardly remain a Serbian leader and
not support the Serbs. Abraham Lincoln was canonized for invading the South
to prevent its secession, but Milosevic was damned for trying to protect
Yugoslavia's territorial integrity. In the end Milosevic accepted secession.
In 1995 Milosevic negotiated the Dayton Agreement which ended the war in
Bosnia. According to the encyclopedia, Wikipedia, "Milosevic was credited
in the West with being one of the pillars of Balkan peace."

In 1998 Milosevic was confronted with a more severe
problem. Armed actions by the separatist Kosovar Liberation Army, listed
as a terrorist organization by the US Department of State, in the ancient
Serbian province of Kosovo broke out into warfare. Milosevic was now trying
to hold on to a province not of Yugoslavia but of Serbia itself, a province
that had been colonized by ethnic Albanians. The Serbian population in Kosovo
was outnumbered nine to one and suffered greatly at the hands of the KLA.

Milosevic, already damaged by the wars of secession
that destroyed Yugoslavia, lost the media campaign waged by public relations
firms hired by contending factions that spun the news that Americans received.
Milosevic was demonized, and the Clinton administration had Serbia bombed
by NATO forces for 78 days in the spring of 1999. Many Serbian civilians
were killed by the air strikes which hit passenger trains and destroyed
the Chinese embassy. In effect, the US interfered in Serbian affairs in
behalf of the secession, with the result that Kosovo has been essentially
ethnically cleansed of Serbs. Kosovo is apparently still considered to be
a part of Serbia, but it is administered by the United Nations. Somehow,
this has been presented as a great moral victory for humanity.

If the massive propaganda campaign against Milosevic
had many facts behind it, he long ago would have been convicted at the Hague.
What was the episode all about?

In my opinion, it was to establish the precedent, later
to be employed in the Middle East, that the US government could demonize
a head of state geographically distant from any legitimate "sphere
of influence" and use military force to remove him. This is precisely
the fate of Saddam Hussein, and the Bush regime still hopes to repeat the
strategy in Iran and Syria.

The unanswered question is why does the "international
community" go along with it? The numerous civilians killed by US interventions
are just as dead as the ones killed by heads of state attempting to hold
on to their countries. Why are the latter deaths war crimes but not the
former?

As a presidential candidate, George W. Bush criticized
President Clinton's intervention in Serbia and disavowed the international
policeman role for the US. But as soon as Bush got in office, he plotted
to invade Iraq. Why?

Americans should be very concerned that Bush still
has not come clean about why he invaded Iraq. Americans should be disturbed
that despite the disastrous results in Iraq, Bush still intends "regime
change" in Iran and Syria.

Jobs Update

The Bureau of Labor Statistics' payroll jobs report
released on March 10 lists 205,000 new private sector jobs for February.
As has been the case for a number of years, the new jobs are in domestic
nontradable services. The sources of February's new jobs are:

* professional and business services, 39,000 jobs (roughly
half of which are in administrative and waste services);

* education and health services, 47,000 jobs;

* waitresses and bartenders, 21,000 jobs.

During the past year, the economy has lost 60,000 private
supervisory jobs, 48,000 manufacturing jobs, 65,000 jobs in nondurable goods
(mainly textiles, apparel, paper and paper products), and 25,000 jobs in
air transportation. Over the last year, the economy has gained 203,000 jobs
for waitresses and bartenders.

New York Times reporter Vikas Bajaj again misreported
the BLS release. He attributed 38,000 state and local government jobs to
businesses.

Charles McMillion of MBG Information Services reports
that hours worked in manufacturing have fallen 7.1 percent during the 51-month
old current recovery and that growth in total private sector hours worked
in non-supervisory jobs is the weakest of any recovery on record. This suggests
that many new jobs are for less than a full 40-hour work week, which could
account for the lack of growth in median household real income.

Due to the overwhelming popularity of
our $39.95 yearly special, we are bringing it back for Spring! This is your
chance to receive over 5 months of access completely free compared to the
standard price. Click
here to subscribe!