Sure you did Wayne . You assumed nobody would notice your sentence structure was meant to imply that a horse could outcount RF and that would anger RF. You had to work that trick by indicating that you assumed the horse was more intelligent and hen implying that your assumption would anger RF. Would you like to stop your childness and act more like an adult now. Puffing yourself up like you have been doing lately isn't helping your internet persona Wayne. Stating by your unilateral choice that others are beneath your intelligence when in fact they have shown your own transgressions is making you look like a paper tiger.

Hey Donnie? RF can handle his own. You're employing a double standard by calling Wayne on the horse counting post, when, for example, RF implies here that Wayne is like an idiot-savant monkey.

RF

Quote:

I'm willing to explain my use of terms and what they mean to the point. There's a difference between that and standing there pointing to a dictionary like an idiot-savant monkey that can recognize a symbol on a paper but can't go on to form real thoughts.

So it is that obvious that Wayne is having trouble that Grace had to put on her cape and come riding to the rescue. Gotcha> Would you see that you are telling me to lay off support of Rf's maintaining dignity here by pointing out that Wayne is trying to destroy him with marginalization tactics. So you don't see your own double standard in jumping on my case Grace??

No rescue mission here, Donnie. Just reminding you to clean off your nose and start reading the threads a little more closely to see how obvious your double standard is. It's one thing to come to one's defense on an issue or a blatant one-sided flame war. Quite another to turn a blind eye to your side's battle tactics, while berating another for using the same.

Sure you are applying double standards Grace. Because I pointed out that RF is being marginalized isn't being a vulgar exercize s you indicate Grace. RF pointed out something that needs to be addressed. Wayne is not the all authoitive figure and mind reading expert he claims to be. As for those standards you seem to have forgotten how the twisted sisters used those standards on us. If we are wrong, time will destroy us as it did your former sisterhood. However I believe we have already arrived at an important point in these debates. Sianblooz is now stating that she supports hunting as long as the meat is used. A new Puppy standard for sure but we can now continue from a new base point.

_________________I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Dang. I hate when this happens. I left this thread in a decent discussion. Now it's another bout between RF and Wayne with everybody else chiming in with their two cents. Well here's my $.02. I say we get back to the discussion at hand. What was it again? Hunting? Guns? Grace's Murano? I don't even remember.

The point of this whole concept by Watson is built on a strawman Fallacy. Hunting exists because hunters exist and we still do gather our food whether in grocery stores or in the wild. Some is hunted and gathered as meat while other food is hunted and gathered as plant food fibre wether it is wild blueberry or wild deer or domesticated ungulate and hydro grown tomatoes. Watson's strawman doesn't match the truth.

_________________I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Sure you did Wayne . You assumed nobody would notice your sentence structure was meant to imply that a horse could outcount RF and that would anger RF. You had to work that trick by indicating that you assumed the horse was more intelligent and hen implying that your assumption would anger RF. Would you like to stop your childness and act more like an adult now. Puffing yourself up like you have been doing lately isn't helping your internet persona Wayne. Stating by your unilateral choice that others are beneath your intelligence when in fact they have shown your own transgressions is making you look like a paper tiger.

Hey Donnie? RF can handle his own. You're employing a double standard by calling Wayne on the horse counting post, when, for example, RF implies here that Wayne is like an idiot-savant monkey.

RF

Quote:

I'm willing to explain my use of terms and what they mean to the point. There's a difference between that and standing there pointing to a dictionary like an idiot-savant monkey that can recognize a symbol on a paper but can't go on to form real thoughts.

So it is that obvious that Wayne is having trouble that Grace had to put on her cape and come riding to the rescue. Gotcha> Would you see that you are telling me to lay off support of Rf's maintaining dignity here by pointing out that Wayne is trying to destroy him with marginalization tactics. So you don't see your own double standard in jumping on my case Grace??

No rescue mission here, Donnie. Just reminding you to clean off your nose and start reading the threads a little more closely to see how obvious your double standard is. It's one thing to come to one's defense on an issue or a blatant one-sided flame war. Quite another to turn a blind eye to your side's battle tactics, while berating another for using the same.

Sure you are applying double standards Grace. Because I pointed out that RF is being marginalized isn't being a vulgar exercize s you indicate Grace. RF pointed out something that needs to be addressed. Wayne is not the all authoitive figure and mind reading expert he claims to be.

Now I'm applying double standards? How is that? I'm not the one riding on someone for riding on someone who's riding on someone.

Sure you did Wayne . You assumed nobody would notice your sentence structure was meant to imply that a horse could outcount RF and that would anger RF. You had to work that trick by indicating that you assumed the horse was more intelligent and hen implying that your assumption would anger RF. Would you like to stop your childness and act more like an adult now. Puffing yourself up like you have been doing lately isn't helping your internet persona Wayne. Stating by your unilateral choice that others are beneath your intelligence when in fact they have shown your own transgressions is making you look like a paper tiger.

Hey Donnie? RF can handle his own. You're employing a double standard by calling Wayne on the horse counting post, when, for example, RF implies here that Wayne is like an idiot-savant monkey.

RF

Quote:

I'm willing to explain my use of terms and what they mean to the point. There's a difference between that and standing there pointing to a dictionary like an idiot-savant monkey that can recognize a symbol on a paper but can't go on to form real thoughts.

So it is that obvious that Wayne is having trouble that Grace had to put on her cape and come riding to the rescue. Gotcha> Would you see that you are telling me to lay off support of Rf's maintaining dignity here by pointing out that Wayne is trying to destroy him with marginalization tactics. So you don't see your own double standard in jumping on my case Grace??

No rescue mission here, Donnie. Just reminding you to clean off your nose and start reading the threads a little more closely to see how obvious your double standard is. It's one thing to come to one's defense on an issue or a blatant one-sided flame war. Quite another to turn a blind eye to your side's battle tactics, while berating another for using the same.

Sure you are applying double standards Grace. Because I pointed out that RF is being marginalized isn't being a vulgar exercize s you indicate Grace. RF pointed out something that needs to be addressed. Wayne is not the all authoitive figure and mind reading expert he claims to be.

Now I'm applying double standards? How is that? I'm not the one riding on someone for riding on someone who's riding on someone.

_________________I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Sure you did Wayne . You assumed nobody would notice your sentence structure was meant to imply that a horse could outcount RF and that would anger RF. You had to work that trick by indicating that you assumed the horse was more intelligent and hen implying that your assumption would anger RF. Would you like to stop your childness and act more like an adult now. Puffing yourself up like you have been doing lately isn't helping your internet persona Wayne. Stating by your unilateral choice that others are beneath your intelligence when in fact they have shown your own transgressions is making you look like a paper tiger.

Hey Donnie? RF can handle his own. You're employing a double standard by calling Wayne on the horse counting post, when, for example, RF implies here that Wayne is like an idiot-savant monkey.

RF

Quote:

I'm willing to explain my use of terms and what they mean to the point. There's a difference between that and standing there pointing to a dictionary like an idiot-savant monkey that can recognize a symbol on a paper but can't go on to form real thoughts.

So it is that obvious that Wayne is having trouble that Grace had to put on her cape and come riding to the rescue. Gotcha> Would you see that you are telling me to lay off support of Rf's maintaining dignity here by pointing out that Wayne is trying to destroy him with marginalization tactics. So you don't see your own double standard in jumping on my case Grace??

No rescue mission here, Donnie. Just reminding you to clean off your nose and start reading the threads a little more closely to see how obvious your double standard is. It's one thing to come to one's defense on an issue or a blatant one-sided flame war. Quite another to turn a blind eye to your side's battle tactics, while berating another for using the same.

Sure you are applying double standards Grace. Because I pointed out that RF is being marginalized isn't being a vulgar exercize s you indicate Grace. RF pointed out something that needs to be addressed. Wayne is not the all authoitive figure and mind reading expert he claims to be.

Now I'm applying double standards? How is that? I'm not the one riding on someone for riding on someone who's riding on someone.

Ok I'm riding on you for riding on Wayne for riding on RF who's also riding on Wayne. BUT, where is the double standard?

Except you completed you assumption and quatified it with perhaps. The point being you imade the structure appear as RF lost to the horse and that is what upset him perhaps. Not a hard thing to admitt you assume that nobdy would notice that slight of words Wayne,we being so stupid and all.

The use of "perhaps" would not 'complete an assumption' nor would it be 'quatified' ... I am not sure what that even is supposed to mean. I did ask the question, but the level of stupidity is your own construct as I assumed nothing.

Sure you did Wayne . You assumed nobody would notice your sentence structure was meant to imply that a horse could outcount RF and that would anger RF.

Which creates an assumption in my statement by what fashion? You seem to be saying the assumption was the effect on RF, which has nothing to do with my post being an assumption in any way.

Quote:

You had to work that trick by indicating that you assumed the horse was more intelligent and hen implying that your assumption would anger RF.

If I had assumed the horse was more intelligent I would have made the statement, but in asking the question I am not making an assumption. Are you clear on what is and is not an assumption.

Quote:

Would you like to stop your childness and act more like an adult now.

Odd that is directed at me when the first such statements were from your group and there was no such response to them .... can you say double standard? Sure you can you just did it.

Quote:

Puffing yourself up like you have been doing lately isn't helping your internet persona Wayne.

It is not a persona, it is the way I view things all of the time.

Quote:

Stating by your unilateral choice that others are beneath your intelligence when in fact they have shown your own transgressions is making you look like a paper tiger.

You can hold your own opinion and I will hold mine.

_________________With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none” Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."Albert Einstein

Dang. I hate when this happens. I left this thread in a decent discussion. Now it's another bout between RF and Wayne with everybody else chiming in with their two cents. Well here's my $.02. I say we get back to the discussion at hand. What was it again? Hunting? Guns? Grace's Murano? I don't even remember.

Point taken, I had pointed out part of this thread should be moved to the open discussion earlier ( I do not like to make the choice if I am involved in such a discussion) which may bring it back into order. Until that time I will refrain from further posting on any but the subject of the thread.

Then I will delete my last post on this topic.

_________________I use red, not because of anger but to define my posts to catch rebuttals latter and it makes the quote feature redundent for me. The rest of you pick your own color.

Dang. I hate when this happens. I left this thread in a decent discussion. Now it's another bout between RF and Wayne with everybody else chiming in with their two cents. Well here's my $.02. I say we get back to the discussion at hand. What was it again? Hunting? Guns? Grace's Murano? I don't even remember.

Point taken, I had pointed out part of this thread should be moved to the open discussion earlier ( I do not like to make the choice if I am involved in such a discussion) which may bring it back into order. Until that time I will refrain from further posting on any but the subject of the thread.

Good deal. I think a separation would be just the cure, and I understand your reasons for not doing it yourself.

_________________"Yes like I said it all boils down to morals. What you think is right doesn't make a person wrong because they think different " X-Black

Sure you did Wayne . You assumed nobody would notice your sentence structure was meant to imply that a horse could outcount RF and that would anger RF. You had to work that trick by indicating that you assumed the horse was more intelligent and hen implying that your assumption would anger RF. Would you like to stop your childness and act more like an adult now. Puffing yourself up like you have been doing lately isn't helping your internet persona Wayne. Stating by your unilateral choice that others are beneath your intelligence when in fact they have shown your own transgressions is making you look like a paper tiger.

Hey Donnie? RF can handle his own. You're employing a double standard by calling Wayne on the horse counting post, when, for example, RF implies here that Wayne is like an idiot-savant monkey.

RF

Quote:

I'm willing to explain my use of terms and what they mean to the point. There's a difference between that and standing there pointing to a dictionary like an idiot-savant monkey that can recognize a symbol on a paper but can't go on to form real thoughts.

So it is that obvious that Wayne is having trouble that Grace had to put on her cape and come riding to the rescue. Gotcha> Would you see that you are telling me to lay off support of Rf's maintaining dignity here by pointing out that Wayne is trying to destroy him with marginalization tactics. So you don't see your own double standard in jumping on my case Grace??

No rescue mission here, Donnie. Just reminding you to clean off your nose and start reading the threads a little more closely to see how obvious your double standard is. It's one thing to come to one's defense on an issue or a blatant one-sided flame war. Quite another to turn a blind eye to your side's battle tactics, while berating another for using the same.

Sure you are applying double standards Grace. Because I pointed out that RF is being marginalized isn't being a vulgar exercize s you indicate Grace. RF pointed out something that needs to be addressed. Wayne is not the all authoitive figure and mind reading expert he claims to be.

How can Grace be using a double standard? Which other poster did she ignore when they made a similar claim? Feel free to quote them because they are not there. You used the double standard, as she pointed out, when you ignored the prior statements by RF solely on your belief he is "on your side in this discussion", which is by definition a double standard.

Notice the times of the quotes and how it was some 18 hours between the two, yet you have railed against one and not mentioned the other yet. How is my response in kind unfair to RF and his post to me acceptable? Other than your personal beliefs there is no justification and those personal beliefs are the basis for the double standard you employ. Maybe you should discuss this with your minister if you have trouble understanding the ethics of the matter.

Still upset because the horse was better at counting than you were perhaps?

What does a horse beating you in counting have to do with the definition of "focus" that you also did not seem to know?

Quote:

As for those standards you seem to have forgotten how the twisted sisters used those standards on us. If we are wrong, time will destroy us as it did your former sisterhood. However I believe we have already arrived at an important point in these debates. Sianblooz is now stating that she supports hunting as long as the meat is used. A new Puppy standard for sure but we can now continue from a new base point.

Now you have some nebulous reason for using this double standard based on some situation with other people in the past? How does that justify dishonesty in any way? I suppose your all seeing and all knowing source can explain it for you ....

_________________With friends like Guido, you will not have enemies for long.

“Intellect is invisible to the man who has none” Arthur Schopenhauer

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."Albert Einstein