this is a badly implemented feature, I have just spent 15 frustrating minutes trying to work out how to get an inline image in a review. Shame on you, it should be easy and encourage people to use not obfuscated and difficult. Try Bogger or any other web user interface to see how it should be done. Bah

Select your image and post. The image will show where the [attachthumb=#] text is.

Now I understand why it seemed to not work: every time I looked at the preview of my messages, I always saw the code only ([attachthumb=#] or similar), I never saw the image in the preview, therefore I believed it didn't work. I'd have never imagined that to see the image it took to post the message.

Select your image and post. The image will show where the [attachthumb=#] text is.

Now I understand why it seemed to not work: every time I looked at the preview of my messages, I always saw the code only ([attachthumb=#] or similar), I never saw the image in the preview, therefore I believed it didn't work. I'd have never imagined that to see the image it took to post the message.

I think I understand what you mean...so here is a video...if I am wrong...tell me, and I shall re-do it

very slick video Stephen (what do you use?)The tip with the numbering is superfluous (it wont screw anything up though!) - the only reason it would be necessary to add numbers would be if you had, say four attachments, and you realised you had attached them in the wrong sequence -then you could use e.g.[attachimg=1][attachimg=4][attachimg=2][attachimg=3]- in this example, the fourth file attached would be shown as the second image in the post.

I think I understand what you mean...so here is a video...if I am wrong...tell me, and I shall re-do it

very slick video Stephen (what do you use?)The tip with the numbering is superfluous (it wont screw anything up though!) - the only reason it would be necessary to add numbers would be if you had, say four attachments, and you realised you had attached them in the wrong sequence -then you could use e.g.[attachimg=1][attachimg=4][attachimg=2][attachimg=3]- in this example, the fourth file attached would be shown as the second image in the post.

Sorry. I tried to get through this, bogged down, and still can't figure out how to link to on-line pix so they'll appear in my posts.Furthermore, the pix I upload all appear in the same small size, no matter how much I enlarge them first.And if I try downloading one of the larger pix in this thread, 'meow' (white tiger), as a test shot, then reposting it in one of my own posts, it still comes out way smaller than original size, like this:

Then again, thought I just had it. Let's try again:Okay, full-size pic if I click on 'attach' first.What threw me is that I couldn't see what it was doing until the post showed. Solved that.But how do you link to an online pic and make that appear?