But no announcement was forthcoming, leaving some in the sector scratching their heads over the impact of a Department for Communities’ consultation about changes to the investment code, released the previous week.

Last week, the Local Government Chronicle reported comments made by CIPFA director of local government, Sean Nolan, that the consultation’s provisions on “borrowing in advance of need” would make such borrowing “near impossible”.

The DCLG consultation document said: “Borrowing solely to invest rather than to deliver statutory services, or strategic objectives, has always been considered to be borrowing in advance of need.

“The government believes that it is appropriate for the revised guidance that recognises (sic) this and requires additional disclosure by local authorities who borrow solely to invest in revenue generating investments.”

Clarification call

However, David Green, client director at treasury adviser Arlingclose, said that this wording amounted to a call for councils to provide greater transparency, rather than a ban.

He said: “The existing guidance from CIPFA, DCLG and the PWLB each discusses how local authorities should handle borrowing in advance, something they are hardly likely to do if it is banned.”

Stephen Sheen, managing director of technical accounting consultancy Ichabod’s Industries, said: “Borrowing in advance of need has always been a legitimate treasury management tool, albeit with some inherent risk, to plan for a future cash requirement. It is not outlawed, and neither will it be by the proposed changes to the statutory guidance on investments.

“All the proposed amendment to the guidance is saying is that borrowing for a purpose other than to facilitate the provision of services is borrowing in advance of need, on the basis that the expenditure did not actually need to take place.”

However, another senior figure in the sector, who did not want to be named, said that when the investment guidance is read together with proposed changes to CIPFA’s prudential code, then it would, in fact, prevent councils from borrowing to invest outside their own boundaries.

The proposed wording, as yet to be adopted, says: “Authorities must not borrow more than, or in advance of, their needs purely in order to profit from the investment of the extra sums borrowed.”

But Green and others argue that the prudential code is generally taken to refer to treasury investments rather than property assets.

Chris Shepherd, director at public sector finance consultancy 31ten, said that further clarification would be needed on the issue if the government’s intention is to prevent councils from borrowing from the PWLB to fund property purchases.

“The key will be whether they will define yield bearing asset as a financial instrument or as an asset.

“The implications of the latter could mean investing in or out-of-borough would be difficult (without an argument for investing for other reasons).”

Wording confusion

Experts also said that the wording used in the DCLG consultation document muddled up two distinct strands of investment. Green said: “It’s odd that DCLG is confusing borrowing in advance with borrowing to invest.

“These are widely accepted as two different concepts: borrowing in advance involves a temporary investment of the borrowed funds until the planned capital expenditure is incurred; with borrowing to invest, the investment is the capital expenditure.”

Register for the Room 151 Weekly Email Digest

Latest tweets

Guy Ware: The business rates retention row of ducks: Business rates retention is delayed but is this an opportunity to put the funding of local services on a sustainable footing for the foreseeable future? Only if four key questions[...] dlvr.it/QKjLkG#localgovpic.twitter.com/C2xCNViBFE

Quartet of councils lined up for Municipal Bond Agency’s first issue: Four councils are poised to be involved in the The UK Municipal Bonds Agency’s debut bond issue after Moody’s gave the agency an Aa3 credit rating. Moody’s said the… dlvr.it/QKCqdp#localgov

NAO calls on Whitehall to confront long-term funding of local government: The government’s fragmented approach to oversight of council finances, and the absence of a long-term funding plan are increasing risks to statutory services, according… dlvr.it/QKBQfR#localgovpic.twitter.com/5otTR1wPa5

LPP kicks off first fixed income fund: Local Government Pension Scheme pool, Local Pensions Partnership, has launched its first fixed income fund. The £320m fund is aimed at delivering long-term risk-adjusted returns on global fixed income… dlvr.it/QK3lSM#localgov

Countdown to LATIF North treasury conference in Manchester: There are just over two weeks to go before Room151’s inaugural treasury conference for the north of England chaired by Manchester City Council’s Tim Seagrave and featuring insight from… dlvr.it/QJy2lV#localgov

100% business rates retention could create inequalities: The government’s plan to allow councils to retain 100% of business rates income could encourage greater inequality between councils without promoting growth, according to a new report… dlvr.it/QJJR6v#localgovpic.twitter.com/yiEkObFvel

Leeds offers business loans through peer-to-peer platform: Leeds City Council is to use a peer-to-peer lending platform to lend money to local businesses. The authority has decided to use the rebuildingsociety.com platform — based in the[...] dlvr.it/QJJDWz#localgov

Northamptonshire palns for £10m in cuts a week after ‘unlawful’ budget: Northamptonshire County Council has approved a revised budget for 2018-19, a week after its auditors warned that its original plans were potentially unlawful. The authority… dlvr.it/QJGQy2#localgov

Carillion collapse causes £5m loss to LGPS funds: Three Local Government Pension Scheme funds have lost up to £5m as a result of direct investments with Carillion, according to an assessment of the impact of the company’s liquidation.[...] dlvr.it/QJGHXq#localgov

Helen Randall: Court ruling over Haringey’s development vehicle offers clarity to councils: Politics killed the controversial Haringey Development Vehicle but a challenge through the courts failed. Helen Randall explains what the ruling means… dlvr.it/QHsBk0#localgovpic.twitter.com/JgYrPCH8E4

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK