The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls.
At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer.
View the web archive through the Wayback Machine.

Any species of property that may be
inherited; lands, tenements, any thing corporeal or incorporeal, real,
personal or mixed, that may descend to an heir.

A corporeal hereditament is visible
and tangible; an incorporeal hereditament is an ideal right, existing
in contemplation of law, issuing out of substantial corporeal property.

Personal Property may only devolve
to a Body Politic via Trust.

The Framers were dealing with
forming a new Body Politic.

The War for Independence won not
only the Lands and other Tangible / Corporeal Properties of the Crown
in the New World, but also the Intangible / Incorporeal Rights of the
Crown and all levels of Nobility under the Crown.

Before we get too far, allow me to
address the only two dissenting positions I am aware of.

1 : The Constitution is a Will with
Articles in Addendum ( Bill of Rights ) being Codicil.

A Will is by nature a Testamentary
Instrument. The Sovereign has no testamentary power at common law.
Again this may be found in Corpus Juris Secundum.

The Founders were acting in behalf
of the new Sovereign Power, the victors of the war. Sovereigns with out
Subjects, and all that. There fore the position the Constitution is a
Will fails.

2 : Lysander Spooner in his treatise
No Treason - The Constitution of No Authority, makes the argument the Constitution
is merely a contract between the signing parties. All deceased and
therefore unbinding in any way.

When one understands the
Constitution as a Trust Instrument and not a personal contract, this
position falls away.

Let's take a look at our contention
the Constitution formed an Estate in Trust .

It takes some study to really grasp
this , so lets just state the Founders followed the Common Law in their
dealings . That's the Common Law of Mother England , by the way .
This body of Law stretches back some 1,000 years . We are dealing
primarily in Estates and Inheritance .

It is a tenet of Law that in order
to determine the intent of a writing one must look to the preamble . (
In Statute that would be the "Empowerment Clause" ) . For our
purposes I will note how it established the Constitution as a Trust
instrument by fulfilling the requirements to establish a Trust .

Definitions of words from the 1828
edition of Webster's American Dictionary of the English Language are
enlightening. Particularly State ( 5. A political body, or body
politic; the whole body of people united under one government, whatever
may be the form of the government. ) and Estate ( 6. The general
business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a
commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ) andStates( n. plu. Nobility.. The ONLY definition )

Numbered items are necessary
elements to establish a Trust . See Bogert on Trusts . Earlier the
edition the better .

WE THE PEOPLE ( 1 - Grantors ) of
the United States ( from or out of the United / Joined Nobility ) , in
Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the General
Welfare , and secure the Blessings of Liberty ( 2 - Statement of
Purpose ) to ourselves and our Posterity ( 3 - Grantees : Heirs unnamed
) , do ordain and establish ( 4 - Statement of Intent . Note : Ordain
comes from Cannon Law ) this Constitution ( 5 - Written Indenture ) for
the United States of America ( Joined Nobility belonging to America : 6
- The Name of the Entity Created )

The Preamble fulfills the
requirements necessary to establish a Trust . Recall that Rights ,
Privileges and Prerogatives of Commoners to Royalty are considered
Personal Property inheritable by decent and Personal Property may only
devolve to a Body Politic via Trust. We took all those combined
Properties as spoils from the War for Independence . Had to divide up
the booty somehow .