The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:<quoted text>AGAIN, F-14's were not used "IN" the Vietnam War. They made no attempt to protect South Vietnam. They were prevented by acts of Congress. Their sole purpose was to escort U.S. aircraft and they rules of engagement stated that!After August 1973 the U.S. military was PROHIBITED from assisting the South Vietnamese!It is like you who thinks that the one third of adult Americans who own guns are deviants but the less that ten percent who are GBT's are not deviants?!?

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>Stop twisting and turning in the wind. I never mentioned the notion of used or not used "IN" the Vietnam war. I said they flew combat. I referred you to numerous web sites that said they did. Why do you argue with them? Why were they escorting U.S. aircraft? Were those aircraft in danger of being attacked? No? then why the escort? Well, Rogue, they WERE at risk of being attacked and any plane that escorted them were on a combat mission. Why do I , of all people, have to tell you that?

Ya know, during hostilities if you are in the military you get a National Defense ribbon. You don't have to go to a place to get it either. In fact even if you did not leave the U.S. yous till got one.Those F-14's were in no more threat than if they had flown into Russia. You are the one who is picking shit, not me.

KERRYS LIES CATCH UP WITH HIMCHRISTMAS IN CAMBODIA FABLEPROVEN FALSE  DEMOCRATS IN APANIC AS WAR HEROS CREDIBILITYQUESTIONED  SELF-PROCLAIMEDWARRIORS WORDS COME BACK TOHAUNT HIM  DD-214 ON KERRYCAMPAIGN SITE MAY BE A FORGERY

KERRYÂS ÂLIESÂ CATCH UP WITH HIMÂCHRISTMAS IN CAMBODIAÂ FABLEPROVEN FALSE Â DEMOCRATS IN APANIC AS ÂWAR HEROÂSÂ CREDIBILITYQUESTIONED Â SELF-PROCLAIMEDÂWARRIORÂSÂ WORDS COME BACK TOHAUNT HIM Â DD-214 ON KERRYCAMPAIGN SITE MAY BE A FORGERY

<quoted text>Stop twisting and turning in the wind. I never mentioned the notion of used or not used "IN" the Vietnam war. I said they flew combat. I referred you to numerous web sites that said they did. Why do you argue with them? Why were they escorting U.S. aircraft? Were those aircraft in danger of being attacked? No? then why the escort? Well, Rogue, they WERE at risk of being attacked and any plane that escorted them were on a combat mission. Why do I , of all people, have to tell you that?

As soon as Rogue is reduced to arguing semantic based on one word he pretends you meant, you know he's realized his gross mistake and is trying to save face.

<quoted text>"even the Daily Caller"? That implies there are more, but even CNN disagrees!

LOL, Rogue Moron is in pretend la la land again. CNN is reporting what Woodward said.

Here's Erik Erickson of Red State on people like Rogue Moron falling for stupid stories and parroting them without so much as reading past a headline.

Conservatives are trying so hard to highlight controversies, no matter how trivial, we have forgotten the basics of reporting: W5 + H as I learned in grade school, also known as who, what, where, when, why, and how, he wrote.We need to establish a baseline for integrity in reporting that then allows us to highlight the truly outrageous.

Erickson cited the Obamaphone story as an example, explaining that while some conservatives aim for basic facts, they end up getting stuck on talking points. They seem to covet access to the Speaker, Senate Minority Leader, and Leadership, reporting their side without question and turn conservatives in Congress into the butt of jokes.

This was of course published at 5:30am Feb. 27. After the release of the emails Woodward is pretending are threatening; After Erickson knew it was a non-story; After the Breitbart "Brain Trust" dug a hole so deep they should be ashamed.

Clue for Birfoons - Footnote. Once you make it to High School Google the term. Most of the texts will cause you to foam at the mouth. I would mention "Blue Book" but don't want to give Androgynous Poster another cardiac event

How much firepower is enough? Would you trust yourself in the wild with a .25 caliber Beretta Jetfire? This is a story of extraordinary self control and marksmanship by a woman against a fierce predator armed only with the Jetfire."While out hiking in Alberta, Canada with my boyfriend we were surprised by a huge grizzly bear charging at us from out of nowhere. She must have been protecting her cubs because she was extremely aggressive. If I had not had my little Beretta Jetfire with me I would not be here today! Just one shot to my boyfriend's knee cap was all it took... the bear got him and I was able to escape by just walking away at a brisk pace. It's one of the best pistols in my collection....."

Clue for Birfoons - Footnote. Once you make it to High School Google the term. Most of the texts will cause you to foam at the mouth. I would mention "Blue Book" but don't want to give Androgynous Poster another cardiac event

<quoted text>1-Minute Bible Love Notes: The Blue Bookbiblelovenotes.blogspot.com/2011/04/blue-book... want to share a beautiful book with you. I think you'll enjoy the lovely illustrations and you might also like hearing how this book impacted my life.

If anyone tells you that God does not speak to us specifically anymore, please donÂt believe them.

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:<quoted text>AGAIN, F-14's were not used "IN" the Vietnam War. They made no attempt to protect South Vietnam. They were prevented by acts of Congress. Their sole purpose was to escort U.S. aircraft and they rules of engagement stated that!After August 1973 the U.S. military was PROHIBITED from assisting the South Vietnamese!It is like you who thinks that the one third of adult Americans who own guns are deviants but the less that ten percent who are GBT's are not deviants?!?<quoted text>Ya know, during hostilities if you are in the military you get a National Defense ribbon. You don't have to go to a place to get it either. In fact even if you did not leave the U.S. yous till got one.Those F-14's were in no more threat than if they had flown into Russia. You are the one who is picking shit, not me.

No threat? Then why were the U.S. military transport planes escorted? Why not leave the escort at home if, as you write, there was no threat. What about all the web sites that say they flew combat? You're the only one who says the opposite. Just say you were in left field, wrong, it's not that hard. I said so myself instantly yesterday, remember?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.