The FBI knows of about 24 domestic terrorist groups. Spokesman Richard Kolko would not say how many are white supremacists.

So why include this in the article if they haven't said how many are "terrorist groups". Propaganda pure and simple. In this snipit they are leading the reader into thinking white supremacist = terrorist.

We definitely need to reject the "white supremacist" identification. It has a connotation that turns away whites and it does not represent my ideology. A supremacist wants to rule over other races, whereas I just want to be left alone from them in a white state.

But this is the fault most of the time of WNs. I don't know if Don or Derek requested that USAToday write a particular ideological label, but most of the time when WNs are interviewed by the MSM they do not disapprove of the supremacist characterization.

Why do WNs remain silent when our enemies use the word white supremacist? Why do WNs allow our enemies to describe us to our folk?

When we force the media to identify us by how we want to be identified, it sends a tacit signal that the media is biased by inappropriately labeling us and it removes the years of Jewish propaganda demonizing the term supremacist.

Would rep you again, but will have to "spread" some around first...

Again, a very solid point, and something that has been bothering me for some time, the "supremacist" label. Problem is when you have people in this movement dressing up playing hollywood nazi, it does more for the propaganda efforts of the ADL, SPLC, etc., than they could ever do on their own (and, not coincidentally, makes me wonder just who is pulling the strings in these types of groups).

The sooner some people in this movement quit acting like the stereotype we are portrayed to be by the jew media, the sooner more and more white people will be unafraid to join.....YMMV

However, the real thanks go to Don Black, Derek Black, David Duke, and the team of many fine individuals Mr. Black has assembled to champion the White Race.

====

While many thanks go to these wonderful proud white people mentioned ,dont forget to give yourselves a pat on the back either.

Without your support Stormfront would be long gone or would not be as strong as it is.

The more sustaining members(most important people here),regular forum members, visitors, the better off Stormfront becomes.

Spread the seeds of thought everywhere possible on the net.(ie everywhere you visit on the net)

As for the 50,000 comment, he must be talking about just the n a z i s in Germany.In Australia we have over 1.2 million supporters out of 21 mill alone against ,mongrelisation,multiculturalism.Thats not even including the white sheep .

And guess what, none of the 1.2 million are n azis .They are merely proud white people who want to be able to preach ,practise and preserve their own rac e, culture, nation.

Those against us are truelly evil racist ,biggotted hypocrits.they have no shame.Pretending to tolerate diversity while supporting a multiculturalism policy which eradicates the very diversity it claims to embrace.that is what gets me.How can so many people be so stupid as to not see the multicultural policy actually destroys the very diversity it claim to embrace.

What are these peoples reasoning.

Thats what i cant understand.

Well actually i can, these people are hell bent on eradicating every single bit of our history.

Again, a very solid point, and something that has been bothering me for some time, the "supremacist" label. Problem is when you have people in this movement dressing up playing hollywood nazi, it does more for the propaganda efforts of the ADL, SPLC, etc., than they could ever do on their own (and, not coincidentally, makes me wonder just who is pulling the strings in these types of groups).

The sooner some people in this movement quit acting like the stereotype we are portrayed to be by the jew media, the sooner more and more white people will be unafraid to join.....YMMV

It seems a lot of people who use the white supremacist/white power moniker fail to realise how powerful a simple word can be. Forunately the door swings both ways so just as the aforementioned labels are counter productive we can also continue to utilize more mainstream terminology like white pride or white rights to get our view across in a more digestable manner. We definately need to move away from the white power and white supremacist label if we ever want to be taken seriously.

But this is the fault most of the time of WNs. I don't know if Don or Derek requested that USAToday write a particular ideological label, but most of the time when WNs are interviewed by the MSM they do not disapprove of the supremacist characterization.

Why do WNs remain silent when our enemies use the word white supremacist? Why do WNs allow our enemies to describe us to our folk?

When we force the media to identify us by how we want to be identified, it sends a tacit signal that the media is biased by inappropriately labeling us and it removes the years of Jewish propaganda demonizing the term supremacist. We need to start calling ourselves something that sends a message about our ideology, like "European preservationists" or something.

"White Nationalist" is a decent step in that direction. Beyond that there is a plethora of diverse ideals, beliefs and opinions held by White Nationalists, so I'm not sure a new label is necessary. But it is certainly a good idea to oppose the use of the "supremacist" label.

No doubt; I had a couple fellas over to help me build a barn. All they talked about all day was "nasty negroes, pizza faced jews, and beaners. More honest white people are seeing what the parasites are doing to America, and they are getting pissed.

Levin estimates fewer than 50,000 people are members of white supremacist groups, but he says their influence is growing with a more sophisticated approach.

I wonder what county in Missouri he is talking about.

Quote:

The FBI knows of about 24 domestic terrorist groups. Spokesman Richard Kolko would not say how many are white supremacists

Maybe because they are mostly enviromentalist nutjobs?

Quote:

Members distribute fliers calling on residents to fight crime they say is committed by illegal immigrants, gangs and drug dealers.

Yeah, I'm so sure they are wrong.

Quote:

In the past year, members have posted 337 entries on Stormfront related to Obama, ranging from whether an Obama victory will start a revolution among whites to whether the candidate will take away gun rights.

Seems most of what I have read is related to the coming chimp-out, whether Obama is elected or not.

I sense fear in this article. They know that the masses are, if not awakening, stirring in their slumber, trying to awaken from the nightmare that America is becoming. They know that the truth and the facts are on our side, and constitute our greatest weapon. Their attempts to portray us as bigotted nutjobs are failing, I predict their next approach will be to silence us.

No doubt; I had a couple fellas over to help me build a barn. All they talked about all day was "nasty negroes, pizza faced jews, and beaners. More honest white people are seeing what the parasites are doing to America, and they are getting pissed.

Agreed, if we were truly able to hear white America speak what is on their minds without fear of being labeled one way or another, I think you will find that our numbers are in the millions!

All that they require is to be shocked from their stupor, and once that happens, I have no doubt our ranks will swell.