@PerfectPhase: I agree on WebGL, even more so since I don't really like OpenGL. But I'm afraid that portability isn't the right argument in this case: considering how the other two browsers fare in the comparison, it looks like this kind of approach would only work right on IE9, making it as unportable as it gets (at least for the time being).

@PerfectPhase: Yes, It is NOT. IT IS STANDALONE W3C standard!You agree, that browsers should support coming W3C HTML5 standard BUT you disagree that browsers should support coming W3C WebGL standard???Any arguments? (But not the one that someone do not want to support this STANDARD).And do not lay that WebGL is browser specific extension, it is not!