Frank Fazio didn’t find Siri funny or helpful. He filed a federal class action lawsuit against Apple saying Siri commercials are “fundamentally and designedly false and misleading.” Apple has filed a motion to dismiss. But does the lawsuit against the voice activated software have legs?

Looking over the lawsuit, Meghan Ryan, a law professor at Southern Methodist University said, “One of the major problems is that there isn’t a whole lot of detail.”

The lawsuit claims Fazio “asked Siri for directions to a certain place, or to locate a store. Siri either did not understand what he was asking or after a very long wait time responded with the wrong answer.”

Ryan said, “It’s hard to tell, based on the complaint, what Siri actually said. Was she close? Did she understand his speech? What was really the problem?”

Would this really be a free country, though, if we couldn't sue companies based on user error?

Apple has pointed out that Fazio could have taken advantage of the 30-day return policy, but why return a product you're dissatisfied with when you could sue instead? I mean, you might get your money back if you return the iPhone, but you might get even more money if you sue its manufacturer.

Listen, I'm all for consumers taking their own best interests to heart. When it comes to plenty of products, returning them might not be enough. A beloved video game franchise, for instance, can't simply be returned if the story is ruined. Bad DRM practices can ruin an otherwise good gaming experience.

A phone, on the other hand, is pretty easy to replace, making this lawsuit the definition of frivolous.

Besides, nobody is claiming Siri is a finished product. In fact, the way the program works is by learning over time. Sort of like how spell check on your phone is supposed to work. I suppose I should sue Google since my phone's spell check is pretty bad. It spells words wrong all the time, or oddly puts the wrong word in when I've spelled something correctly.

That's grounds for a lawsuit, right?

Lawsuits can serve a valuable purpose. When it comes especially to dangerous products or actual false advertising or other bad business practices, a lawsuit can be a useful form of intervention or renumeration. But suing Apple because Siri isn't as wonderful as you thought it would be? Come on, people.