I focus almost exclusively on PvP, whether solo, small gang, or large bloc warfare. In the past, I've been a miner, mission runner, and faction warfare jockey. I'm particularly interested in helping high-sec players get into 0.0 combat.

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Between botched CCP events and mechanics changes (and
everyone can find something to complain about with every change), discussion
about Eve in recent months has been filled with cries of “the end is
nigh!”With the American holiday of
Thanksgiving happening today, it seems only fair I use this post to talk about
the things in Eve that make it an experience to remember.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

I’ve been away for a while, probably a combination both of
RL and the psychological effect of training a 36-day skill (JDC V, one of the
nastiest practical skills).

During that time, I’ve been thinking a lot about the Rubicon
changes in general, as well as the paradigm-shifting interceptor changes in
particular.In general, I still hold to
my opinion that Rubicon’s changes are not that impressive, though they are
significant.I have yet to see a ghost
site, and while I appreciate attempts to make PvE more interesting, I really
feel like they phoned this patch in.

Yes, mobile siphons are going to be annoying for all the
major blocs and may result in significant null sec changes in a “death by a
thousand cuts” way, but the change itself seems a relatively simple one.And mobile depots are an interesting
addition, too.Once they add in the T3
refitting in space,

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Well, as anyone who has been playing the game since Tuesday
is aware, interceptors are all the rage now.Early adopters like Black Legion have begun experimenting with Crow
fleets with Sabre support.

Incidentally, I was flat-out wrong when I suggested CCP would purge all charges with
the Rubicon expansion.I saw at least
one Sabre launch a whole series of bubbles, a fun trick each pre-Rubicon fitted
Sabre can do once before having to reload.They were having a little fun with it, making what appeared to be skid
marks in space.My 10-bubble Sabre is
sitting in my hangar until I really need it.

On Tuesday afternoon, I watched them practice with the new
mechanics in Doril.In particular, I
noticed that they spend some time setting up bookmarks and practicing warping
to various locations.No longer can an
Interceptor simply warp to a station, be caught by his gang’s bubble, and
tackle a

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

With the Rubicon patch, the Internet is ablaze with chatter
about benefits, consequences, raging, and trolling about the various
features.This post is not about
Rubicon.Briefly, I’ll say I’m not
really impressed with Rubicon as an “expansion”, since expansions, in my mind,
are supposed to shift paradigms regarding the experience.Rubicon would make a great patch, though, as
it makes tweaks here and there, changes some things, etc.But an expansion?I don’t feel very expanded.

That said, I do want to talk about something I read on Eve
News 24 about the mobile siphon units.Not them themselves… they’re the most
interesting thing in Rubicon (but, again, not “expansion”-worthy).Look down in the comments, and you find a
discussion about why Tidi is so terrible, which is silly.

The argument they use is something like this, “Tidi
sucks.It strengthened nodes so fleet
fights of 1000 pilots could happen without causing crashes, but it did it so
well that now we have fleet fights of 3000 pilots.And now the nodes are still crashing, so tidi
didn’t work.Now the blocs are bigger,
and that sucks!Screw tidi!”

Monday, November 18, 2013

It’s the most basic question in Eve, but for some reason,
folks tend to forget about it when they head out to PvP.Too often, I see people trying to chase a
Cynabal out of their space in an armor cruiser (it’s not fast enough). Or an assault frigate hunting ratting Tengus
solo (can’t do enough damage).Or a gate
camp that contains only one tackler, with the rest DPS ships (if your tackler
gets popped…).

Or even a Sabre or bomber in low-sec.

The list of stupid things is endless.While sole of them are obvious, some of them
are less so.A lot of times, people take
excellent ships to do wholly inappropriate things with them.

Friday, November 15, 2013

We’ve all been there.After a few hours of roaming without seeing so much as the ionized vapor
of an engine trail, you finally catch what appears to be a perfectly innocent
little target on grid with you.Maybe
it’s a Loki on a gate that aggresses you, or an Ibis sitting innocently in
space, just doing nothing.All of a
sudden, you find that your victim isn’t quite as alone as you thought, and
you’re neck-deep in trouble. So, you try to de-aggress.

I’ve said before that what defines a
winning poker player is not how big they win, but how small they lose, and that
the same is true in Eve.After all, you
can’t get kills #2, 3, and 4 of the night if you die killing your first ship.

This is where situational awareness comes in, particularly
when you’re in a situation where you can successfully escape, such as on a gate
or station.Let me give you three
instances in which an aggressed ship successfully de-aggressed in time to
survive to fight another day.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Over at Jester’s Trek, Ripard
Teg posts every year listing the ships sitting in his hangar.He uses it to track changes in fleet
doctrines, fittings, and functions over time, particularly as a result of
expansions and rebalances.I thought it
was such a good idea, I’ve decided to steal it.

But instead of annually, I’m
going to look at my hangar just before every expansion.Immediately after an expansion, my hangar
tends to change rapidly and chaotically, but after a few months, it’s usually
pretty settled.With Rubicon about three
weeks away, I figure now’s as good a time as any to commemorate my ships for
Odyssey.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Elite PvP… you always think you’re elite, but everyone else can think of several reasons why you aren’t.Ever since the tragedy in Doril
during the live event, people have re-opened the discussion about elite
PvP.I’ve seen a couple reddit posts
about this, too.Is it possible to come to a consensus about what elite PvP is?Probably not.But I play Eve, so I’ve already shown a willingness for self-abuse.

First, realize this: I’m not talking about FCing.I’m talking about individual tactical
piloting skills of the average player, not the meta strategies of fleet
commanders.You can have an elite fleet
commander leading a bunch of scrubs, and you can have a fleet of wonderful
elite PvPers without any FC at all.The
two are not casually related.

I’m not an elite PvPer, but I strive to be.I need to improve a whole lot and gain more
experience in a wider variety of situations.But what exactly am I striving for?

To set the record straight, I know of no devs who are in
Razor, and we didn’t receive advance notice.Razor has been deployed in Doril for about two months now, and it was
pure coincidence that CCP’s event ran right through our warzone.

But, Razor was the first null-sec alliance on the field,
camping the Sendaya gate in Zealots to take out anything that jumped
through.Goons came in with a sentry
doctrine, probably to prove yet again that drone assist needs a nerf.In fact, the only frustrating thing for us
about the whole day was when the Goons were stealing our kills by assigning
drones to a fast-locking target caller!

At first, it was a trickle.Then the whole fleet came out.By
that point, PL, NC., Darkness, and many, many more null-sec alliances were on
the field, and we were all popping anything shiney that came through the
gate.T3s, navy and pirate ships, T2
battlecruisers… it was an orgy of destruction.And

First off, yes, I was involved
in the KW-I6T battle, coming in for the last four hours (covered at Mittani.com and EveNews24).I’m not going to talk about the reasons
behind it or the way the battle developed, but I do want to talk about experience-related
issues.

Basically, the node appeared not
to be reinforced, even though the battle was planned and major battles occurred
at the same time of day for the past few days.Lag was reminiscent of the pre-tidi times – and tidi itself was maxed the
entire time.At one point, I had a 5
minute delay between entering a command and it being accepted by the
server.

Let me give you one example of
the experience.Razor heard EMP was
suffering problems with cash flow, so we figured that for every EMP carrier we
destroyed, there was a chance we wouldn’t see that pilot in a carrier again for
a long while.We primaried one of their
Archons and watched it drop to 73% armor… then stay there for 10 minutes.None of us saw any changes in the Archon, and
the reason ended up being because we were all desynched – our commands hitting
the server.I watched my guns keep 11
charges for ten cycles.Only by
unlocking and relocking the Archon – a process that took 10 minutes – did we
see he had dipped to 11% structure, but during the 10 minutes when our turret
fire commands weren’t being accepted, he caught reps.He would have died if not for the horrible
lag.

Then CCP started punting
clusters and trying to work their magic to speed up the node.Myself and nearly every other player was
kicked at least once – including the Titan pilot who was at the center of the
whole fight, but he remained in space since he was bubbled.Once I logged back in, the server seemed more
responsive… for about ten minutes.My
command-delay was up to 26 minutes when the node finally crashed, disconnecting
everyone in system.

After that, PL actively pinged
its membership NOT to log back in.Given
how long the fight took and the lack of reinforcements, it’s safe to say PL
saved their capital fleet – and several supercaps, including the Titan –
because CCP is incapable of keeping its game running.And it’s not the first time, either.

I have to credit CCP with trying
to fix the node on the fly.I really do
appreciate that effort.But they can’t
rely on their on-call staff to fix problems that poor planning caused.It’s unfair to those employees.I have no doubt that those employees did
everything they could.

But CCP needs to understand the
frustration this causes.As it stands,
flying a Titan is perfectly safe… just crash the game by range-pinging for as
many pilots as possible to enter system.Hell, you can even invite them to shoot you.It’d make no difference.

CSM member Ripard Teg posted his
opinions about this whole situation,
but I have to wholeheartedly disagree.CCP promotes the game through player-run events like Asakai and KW-I6T.They get press for these events, and that
press generates buzz that has no doubt resulted in new subscriptions.They use these events – which are entirely
player-generated – to profit.They build
an expectation that Eve Online can deliver these sorts of events.

Which it can’t.CCP proved that again in KW-I6T.It’s false advertising as the game currently
stands

I’ve stated before that there’s
nothing quite as enjoyable as small gang PvP.It combines the coordination of fleet combat with the emphasis on player
skill that solo PvP requires.Those
kinds of fleets tend to be looser and more social.They offer the best chance to get kills,
too.Gangs of 10-15 don’t scare
potential targets as much as fleets of 50 do.

Quite simply, if you want a
fight, go in a small gang.

One of the corporations in my
alliance, Repercussus, runs a weekly small gang roam every Friday night.The composition usually changes, but this
week they ran assault frigs, and I joined them.Being in assault frigs, the objective was to catch folks in FW sites and
running missions – anything away from gate guns.I brought a Dramiel for some speed (I’ll
probably write a quick guide on how to fly – and survive in – a dual-prop
Dramiel in the near future).

Did I mention it was a drunk
roam?As with many things in this world,
sometimes, a little alcohol can sooth the nerves.Our minds are cluttered places, and a little
buzz can actually help your flying by clearing all the extra junk out of
them.It forces you to live in the
moment, and that can be a very good thing for Eve.

Our roam began much as assault
frigate roams do… moving quickly while searching for targets.Individual members would go off and check
various FW plexes for targets, using dscan to pinpoint possible locations.It’s very much a “swarm of bees” situation.

I joined late, so the fleet had
already taken down a Deimos earlier in the night.My first engagement was when one of our
pilots caught a Tempest Fleet Issue on the gate of a medium FW site and called
in the cavalry.We were all orbiting at
around 7 km in case of smart bombs.As
we got it down to about half shields, a Cyclone arrived to “save” it.We switched to killing all the drones, then
took the Cyclone and TFI out.

It was a long fight – about five
minutes – and at one point my close orbit against the Cyclone took me to about
30 km out from the TFI.He saw my
distance and began to lock me, but I was able to recover transversal as I
closed range again.It was a close call
made because I was focusing too much on a ship that I didn’t need to worry
about. Orbiting the Cyclone was irrelevant with his missiles.Lesson #1: keep transversal against the more
deadly target.

About an hour later, we entered
our second engagement, which consisted of a fight in a small FW site against a
Kitsune, Incursus, and Hawk.I pulled
the duty of engaging the Kitsune, and managed to get my drones on him before he
perma-jammed me.Ultimately, those
drones forced him from the field, but we had enough dps to kill the Hawk and
Incursus easily.I feel like it was a
missed opportunity… a couple more points and we could have taken that all of
them down.I honestly don’t understand
why the Incursus and Hawk remained for the fight… they were vastly outnumbered,
but they flew well enough to last longer than they had a right to expect,
perhaps 3 minutes or so against our entire fleet.Well done!

But, I made up for the Kitsune
getting away by catching a Brutix at the sun a few jumps away.He was about 40-50 away from me, so I had to
burn towards him quickly before he could escape – in a Dramiel, that’s about 5
km/s.Naturally, this brought me into
web range.But – since I was dual-prop
fit, even webbed and scrammed, I was still going 600 m/s until I escaped web
range.I was never below 90% shields.

Friday, November 1, 2013

In the Reddit comments to my recent suggestion to add
pockets to null-sec within which pilots don’t show up in local,
a few players scoffed at the idea that roamers hunting miners either a) never
generate defense fleets to chase them off, or b) run away from the slightest
resistance.

I can personally attest that every roamer in Razor space
generates at least a few people willing to hunt them down, simply for the
affront of believing they could travel or – gasp! – plex in our space.Generally, these infiltrators are killed if
they’re not flying cloaky ships, and about half the time if they are.We take defending our space very seriously.

And we’re obviously not the only ones.Already, I’ve written about one situation
in which I both a) hunted ratters to generate response fleets, and b) fought
them when they arrived.In that case, I
expected to face smaller gangs and was surprised by the number, but I could
have even survived after getting a couple kills (assuming I had the chance to
warp out, which I believe I did).For
this post, the point is that the defenders did respond to my incursion exactly
as I hoped, and it generated content for both of us (ie. I didn’t run).

I think it’s safe to say that in the regard of “defending
your space” and chasing outsiders away, if people do it, they’ll do it anywhere:
WH, null-sec, or low-sec space.After
all, it touches on the same sentiment in players, the desire to defend what you
believe to be yours.Having sov is
irrelevant to “ownership”.Just ask
low-sec corps or NPC null corps in Syndicate.

Subscribe via RSS

Copyright Notice

EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. CCP hf. has granted permission to Target Caller to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, Target Caller. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.