The attack on London represents a brutal attempt
to coral the British population behind accepting the introduction of the
national ID card, renewing support for the war on terror and reinvigorating
trust in a government that had the backing of less than 15 per cent of the
country.

Even at this very early stage it is clear that
the evidence points to inside involvement.

The statement on a website from an unknown
Al-Qaeda group claiming responsibility is exactly what we'd expect after such an
event. Santa Claus could post a message saying he was responsible for the
attack, does that make it so? Rupert Murdoch's Sky News are busy playing
Al-Qaeda training videos with masked militants jumping through flaming hoops.
The emotive propaganda is clear, these images are being linked in montages with
past images of 9/11, the Bali bombing and the Madrid bombing and injured people
crying in the streets.

Even if the police and government back away from
the Al-Qaeda claim, which now appears to be the case, pro-establishment Neo-Con
media outlets will repeat it like an endless drumbeat until it sinks in.

The key evidence thus far is as follows.

Original Associated Press and Israeli radio
reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli Prime Minister
received a warning before the first explosion that an attack was about to take
place. Scotland Yard passed on a warning to the Israeli embassy who forwarded it
to Netanyahu. Netanyahu was due to make a speech at a Hotel adjacent to the site
of the first blast. He cancelled the speech and remained in his hotel room.

"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in
advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel
room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first
explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and
economic summit."

For an hour after the first blast, the
government and the news media were reporting that the cause was an electrical
power surge. If the government knew bombs were going to go off before they did,
why did they report for an hour that it was an accident? Were they trying to
bide time so they could get their story straight?

Both Scotland Yard and the Israelis have since
denied that they had any foreknowledge of the attack.

Since the original report, major TV news
networks have been completely silent on the Netanyahu story. They are just
repeating claims that there was no prior knowledge.

About an hour after the story broke, Associated
Press started altering their online news stories, stating that Netanyahu got the
warning after the first blast and not before. It seems as if they are scrambling
to co-ordinate their cover story. Either there were no warnings or the warning
was after the first blast. The dithering seems to suggest there is some
confusion on how to successfully hide the smoking gun, the fact that Netanyahu
was warned before the first explosion.

Why didn't the people on the trains and buses
get the same warning?

On June 7th, MI5 downgraded the London terror
alert from its second highest level severe general to a lower category of
substantial.

Why did they do this, was somebody lowering the
guard?

The timing of the attack is very suspicious,
coming on the heels of the start of the G8 conference. Both Tony Blair and
George Bush in their speeches have tried to paint the attack as an assault on
globalization and the G8 itself. This means that if you're against the G8 and
globalization, then you're with the terrorists! It's a tried and tested method
they've used time and time before.

In any crime you look at history and motive, The
British government has been caught in multiple examples of carrying out bombings
in London which were then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own MI5
agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click
here for an archive of this evidence.

The British government has also been caught
scripting fake terror alerts for political effect. Days before the Queen's
speech notable November speech in which she first introduced ID card
legislation, ITN news correspondants and government lobbyists got together to
cook up a fake terror alert involving planes attacking Canary Wharf. A London
Independent article later exposed this as a crass psy-op campaign
to get the British people behind the ID card.

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The
bombers were found to be police
informants with close links to the Spanish
security services. They had access to the most secure areas of the
Madrid train system. The Spanish government initially tried to blaim the Basque
group ETA for the blast in the hope that the people would rally behind the
government and get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and the people
started saying the government was involved, the Spanish government had to blame
Al-Qaeda and kill some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up during a
raid.

The wider agenda will become clearer when Blair
firmly points the finger at the selected patsies designated to take the fall.
But for the moment he's happy to grandstand as the courageous leader who
immedately returned to London to take control of the chaos.