Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive55

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.

Delete The article could have a lot of potenial... but no. The person just copied Wikipedia article and added some stupid fart jokes... Get rid of it now please. --Dexter111344 14:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

This is why I watch all the pages I ICU. Reckon you could probably get away with just re-ICUing. But since it's here: Delete. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete It's almost worth keeping for its crappy take on hip-hop slang mixed with basic chemistry and Bible study. On the other hand, it's stupid. If someone offers to fix, I'll change my vote. --Smrt-guy 22:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep The Tyson stuff is a step away from Oscar and, though a step in the wrong direction, it's a step we must support. ICU this bad boy and see what happens. Besides - it's funny! "writing does not have arms and is unable to carry any connotations" - good stuff! --Smrt-guy 22:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep -- I've started revising it. Others can step up to the plate if they want. ----OEJ 01:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep This is miles better than alot of stuff that's miles worse. Matt lobster 10:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete as nominator. The article is a scrap heap of totally unformatted text, and I can't find any redeeming humor value. This is a contested {{PROD}} (although I probably wasn't supposed to use the PROD template). --Pentium5dot1 02:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

A Romanian might have a better idea what is going on. Gălăciuc is, according to Wickedpedia, a youth camp in the Romanian Carpathians. Annual activities include a software development contest, which I suspect is the thrust of the article to hand. Sounds like rather a nice spot -- "Gălăciuc is an excellent venue for paragliding, mountaineering and sightseeing....Trout fishing is possible either in the Putna river or the Lepşa trout farm." See also "fenshee's" photos from the area of the camp. Many people are maimed and insulted by rogue Romanian programmers yearly. We live in a wonderful world. ----OEJ 16:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete -My IQ went down about fifty points from reading this. My 12 year old brother could have written a better article. I would adopt it but I'm way too tired at the moment. Railcgun 23:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

FLAME THIS IS COMMUNIST CHINESE PROGRAM TO INCRIMINATE DEAR READER! ALL HAIR CHEN SHUI-BIAN! SHIEEG HAIR! (/sarcasm) Seriously though this article could have been made by KMT lackeys. And I am a KMT member. Railcgun 23:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Not sure if this is vanity or not. Either way, it's not funny, and apparently packed with copyvios (at least according to these edits). -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

"Simon Belmont's research is now only withheld within the annals of The St. Roberts' Bible" is funny for the comical misuse of "withheld". The Wickedpedia article on Belmont is here. ----OEJ 02:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Officially one of the oldest articles here (from March '05), has been slowly withering to death. Begun by an IP, six edits total (including vandalism and revert), last one in July '05. Did I mention its lack of worth? — Lenoxus 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you people seriously going to make us start putting up "record of deletion attempt" notices just like wikipedia? Seriously, how many times has this been nommed? How many times has it been kept for pretty obvious reasons.---Rev. Isra(talk) 07:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

i optioned all the facts to make it more readable, less sprawling' - jack mort |cunt| talk - 23:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

ED content does not belong here. As they say over there, Flush --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete: we can blame ED for every bad article on Uncyclopedia. It just makes sense. This one could be a lot better. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 19:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete. The preoccupation with left-right and up-down reeks of autism. ----OEJ 00:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Some of the text might be better for ED, but the images are not too badly inappropriate. Perhaps try UN:PEE or {{rewrite}}, and if that isn't agreed upon, Weak Redirect to Anime or delete without prejudice against recreation. --Pentium5dot1 03:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep - Love it: 'Mary replied, "The first son of God is Jesus, the second son of God is Jesus, if there's a third son of God, guess what, he'll be called fucking Jesus, now get over it."' -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep - needs a bit of a cleanup, maybe even a British tag, but it's funny! --Smrt-guy 00:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Move to user space. Blahshoe is a nice fellow and was even candidate for the last Noob of The Month. Just leave a message to him and I guess he will make no complaints. -- herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 00:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Taken care of this myself. Case closed. Let's just wait for the admins to remove the QVFDed redirect. -- herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 00:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep. There needs to be a place for these to go. Don't include them in other pages, fine, but if there's no specific page it'll only get replaced with crap. Just look at what happened to YTMND a similar article I can't remember the name of right now. •Spang•☃•talk•01:44, 5 Mar 2007

Keep. I don't particularly care about Chuck Norris, as such, but there really are a lot of Chuck Norris pages, so it seems to me that a disambiguation page makes sense (and is rather wiki-ish, as well). --cScott (talk • log)KUNPIENSFP 02:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep - We need a place to disambiguate all the Chuck Norris cowbell. Capercorn 02:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Keep Yea, there is too much of that dude, and thats why we need a page like this.... GSPbeetlecomplainsVandalisms 10:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

i'm gonna say keep, because something could be made from it. if we have one good article about a fictional school then we can call every other school vanity article redundant - jack mort |cunt| talk - 19:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Nom and Delete Cruft, plain and simple. Codeine's Mum hasn't heard of it I'm sure. It's not funny, and even though it has a wikipedia entry, that too is up for deletion.--Shadowlost 17:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

You might want to shift what you wrote into the "comments" section rather than leave it crossed out, because I for one got mighty confused reading "see comment below." Also, I think the audio is plenty shiny, but that's in the ear of the beholder, of course.— Lenoxus 06:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Let's make a record of successes: correct grammar, spelling, and prose (5 points), absence of cruft and cliches (1 point), and (sorry, Smrt-guy) no reliance on offensiveness for its own sake (1 point). This is VFD, not VFH. If every article that were at the same vaguely enetertaining level as this one were huffed, Uncyc would drown. No, it's not entirely laugh-out-loud (yet), so it should probably go through Pee Review, or at least ICU. — Lenoxus 06:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Keap. I just made a start by ading the /innuendo/ section. The resties is uppes to youses -- di Mario 00:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Tiddle I can just imagine this read in a geeky voice though, followed by said Tiddlywinks fan collapsing onto the floor with grating geeky laughter. If someone is willing to record that as an audio then definitely Keep. -- (but) <s>Untrue</s>Whhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually it's four paragraphs - the best one got blanked by an IP which made the article worthless. Keep because it now describes what Tiggers really like best. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 01:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Shy Keep with a 7-day stay. It has some good ideas, but doesn't go anywhere with them. If no one loves it enough to fix it by March, then HUff it. --Smrt-guy 02:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I have to say k33p, but only because of the Hitler Piglet picture. --El Destructeso 00:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep This article could use some improvment, but it is salvagable. GeneralTso'sChicken 20:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete It seems to be overly crappy, one could do a much better article with some time and creativity. Shadowlost 14:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Some articles here become comic gold when they are kept, others are left around to rot. As this article stands, though, it is probably better to demolish it than to rewrite it. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Ok Strange, I got your message, check the history, and revert IP edits, but it still sucks. Capercorn 01:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)