* Humans procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits because the current international law social contract; provides the worlds nations citizens with the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’.

* Humans will stop procreating and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits when legislators amend the international law social contract; to require all the worlds citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

Simple Root Cause Problem Solving Recommendation:

Ask CPAC 2017 speakers and attendees to vote on the following legally binding suggestion to eliminate the manmade causes of their economic, racial, religious, ideological, refugee/immigration and psychological resource conflict problems.

CPAC2017 agrees to support EoP international law legislation requiring all the worlds nations political parties to agree to implement national legislation by 11 September 2017; that requires all nations citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits. Any political party which refuses to cooperate; is to lose their political party license; and any nation that refuses to remove the violating political party’s license may be legally charged in an international court; by any individual in that nation or another nation with the intention to bribe their citizens to overbreed or overconsume; which shall be considered crimes of aggression acts of war; punishable by the death penalty for every single member of that political party.

Once implemented all political parties will be on an even playing field and will no longer be able to bribe their citizens with individual or corporate welfare to vote for their political party. Politicians shall have to find their Thomas Sankara backbones; to cooperate with their citizens to teach them how to become cooperating self-reliant sustainable nations.
– EoP CPAC17: IG: 17-02-23_kenbone-cpac; EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 23 Feb: Rose Mudd Perkins … Tom Cotton.

I have not received any response to aforementioned correspondence sent to yourselves and colleagues of yours between 02 March 2016 to 29 August 2016; which I have transferred to EoP Legal Submissions available at: eop-v-vjjl.tygae.org.za, summary as follows:

Request for Information / Questions for Van Jones:

Since the advent of European / Jewish Military and Financial World Domination:

Do you know of any Non-European: African, African American, Latino, Muslim etc; who has: personally or legally directly approached European / Jewish Human Factory Farming Slave Master Oppressors; requesting them to engage in a public political and/or legal conversation that has never been had before; a conversation about abolishing the Masonic Left/Right Wing Human Factory Farm; a conversation about cooperating to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that requires all the worlds citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be exterminated from the planetary genepool?

Do you know of any ‘progressive’ Non-European: African, African American, Latino, Muslim lawyer, religious, philosophic advisor who has advised ‘progressive’ Non-European or European ‘Progressive’ political leaders to: personally or legally directly approach ‘conservative’ European / Jewish Human Factory Farming Slave Master Oppressors; requesting them to engage in a public political and/or legal conversation that has never been had before; a conversation about abolishing the Masonic Left/Right Wing Human Factory Farm; a political and legal conversation about cooperating to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that requires all the worlds citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be exterminated from the planetary genepool?

I have not been able to find any such historical information about any ‘progressive’ Non-European: African, African American, Latino, Muslim lawyer, religious, philosophic advisor or religious or political leader?

My working hypothesis is that the reason I have not been able to find such a ‘progressive’ Non-European lawyer, religious, philosopher advisor or political leader; is because they all secretly believe that Non-Europeans are – in terms of their procreation capabilities and skills: sexual discipline, responsibility and fully informed consent gender relations restraint – about as sexually ‘superior/inferior’ equal to cockroaches on viagra.

Put differently they secretly believe that the majority of Non-Europeans are incapable of procreation discipline.

Put simply: They think Non-Europeans are inferior beings; are not and never will be ‘equal’ to a European or Asian or Jew; a significant majority of whom are capable of procreation discipline; and who are not remotely threatened by an international law social contract; that would require them to procreate below ecological carrying capacity limits.

In ‘progressive’ terminology: Progressives know they are racists – according to their own definition of ‘racist — because of their secret beliefs about Non-Europeans cockroaches on Viagra behaviours; but do not have the integrity to admit it to themselves. They also don’t love or care for Non-Europeans enough to believe that Non-Europeans deserve to know the brutal in your face truth; about what they believe about Non-Europeans ‘cockroach on viagra’ behaviours. Non-Europeans are quite simply nothing more than economic and political welfare vote farm cannon fodder to them in their fuck honour desire for power.

If love is defined as buck stops here brutal honesty:

Do you love Non-Europeans enough to think that Africans, Muslims, Latino’s addicted to fornicating like cockroaches on Viagra; deserve an honourable public honest conversation about whether they are capable of procreation discipline?

Do you think Donald Trump loves European and Jewish Consumptionist addicted elite addicted to consuming like bling n*ggers on crack enough to think that they deserve a public honest conversation about whether they are capable of consumption discipline?

If neither of you love your respective followers enough to engage them in a buck stops here honest conversation about their procreation / consumption addiction sources of racism, nazims, etc; then what exactly is the difference between the two of you?

Are you aware that a significant number of animals are capable of ecologically literate procreation – as documented in The Social Contract: A Personal Inquiry into the Evolutionary Sources of Order and Disorder, by Robert Ardrey – i.e. animal-cultural-consciously or genetic-unconsciously choosing to practice family planning: control or restrict their breeding with regard to abundance or scarcity of their resource environment; such as Norway rats, red grouse; Australian magpie; Uganda kob antelope; wildebeest, waterbuck, Grant’s & Thomson’s gazelle; southern springbok, hartebeest, topi, puku, oribi, dik-dick, steenbok, lion, kittiwake; etc.

EoP New Rules or WiP No Rules Los Pepes Negotiations:

‘If Wilson was right that competition occurs only when overcrowded numbers struggle for a scarce resources, then Malthus is confirmed; and humanity has little to look forward to but that chaotic day when in unlimited number we assassinate one another in our pursuit of inadequate resources. But if Wynne-Edwards is right, any population, human or non-human, has within its power the limitation of numbers through conventional rules and regulations and the capacity to abide by them.” – Ardrey quoted in EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations infographic: 16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract.

EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations focus is to ascertain whether anyone is interested in cooperating to ‘turn off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order international law social contract; that requires all the worlds citizens of all races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; enabling humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation return to ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP: Re: WiP Conservatism and Liberalism et al

If your ‘conservatism’ has no buck stops here concern for establishing a legal social contract that legally conserves your nations resources; upon which all of life’s species rely upon for survival and sustenance; in accordance with ecological carrying capacity limits; by requiring your nation’s citizens to restrict their procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; then your ‘conservatism’ efforts to pretend to be concerned about conserving any other religious, racial or class cultural values is akin to farting against thunder. Put simply: If your conservatism is not about conserving the ecological carrying capacity resource foundations upon which all of life reside; your ‘conservatism’ ain’t nothing but fuck honour bullshit the public relations image management vote welfare bribery.”

If your reasons for your lack of response is that you don’t think that non-europeans are biologically, sexually and/or psychologically capable of ecologically literate responsible freedom procreation; then it would appear that your covert opinions about non-europeans are no different from white supremacist’s overt opinions about non-europeans, and their covert opinions about lower class europeans.