2nd point - while you say I require a extra assumption. I would like to point out that I agree with with yours explanations in terms of the mathematics, cosmology, and physics. But it is flawed on the basis it missing one critical piece - the artist/director/designer.

Everyone knows that Xenu brought people to earth, in his DC-8, 75 million years ago.

May I suggest that the paint brush that I used to paint my viewpoint on atheism is just as wide regarding your viewpoint on God.

Touch'e

You're kidding, right? You're going to use "I know you are, but what am I" and you think you've delivererd a cutting rebuttal? Myke, most of us are insulted because you think your juvenile prattle qualifies as rational discussion. I've been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but Paleo is right -- you are basically just a bag of air. And a troll. Despite repeated attempts on our part to get you to provide evidence -- any evidence -- any slightest trace of proof -- of the existance of your deity, you have consistently dodged and/or ignored the request in favour of a bunch of puerile insults and schoolyard rejoinders (see above). You seem to be completely unaware of the difference between an argument and a statement so all you do is provide statements of your own opinion, unsupported by anything but other statements of your own opinion, defended by statements of your own opinion (with the occasional insult thrown in) and you think you have equal credibility. I've already put way more calories into trying to kick-start your intelligence than you're worth. So, you want to believe that an invisible sky fairy created the universe, created the earth in 6 days by sprinkling pixie dust, then fine. Feel free. I'm going to take consolation in the fact that you and those like you are doomed to a life of irrelevance and increasing marginalization, while the rest of the world gets on with reality.

"2nd point - while you say I require a extra assumption. I would like to point out that I agree with with yours explanations in terms of the mathematics, cosmology, and physics. But it is flawed on the basis it missing one critical piece - the artist/director/designer."

"2nd point - while you say I require a extra assumption. I would like to point out that I agree with with yours explanations in terms of the mathematics, cosmology, and physics. But it is flawed on the basis it missing one critical piece - the artist/director/designer."

CM, I and others have addressed that again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and personally I'm getting tired of it, because you just ignore the response. Remember when I said "you make statements and think they're arguments" ? Well the sentence that begins "But it is flawed" is a STATEMENT, GOD DAMN IT! I will reply one last time: No it isn't flawed, no it isn't missing anything. There is no artist/director/designer because there is no evidence of one, and no need for one. Present evidence that would tend to indicate the existance of a deity, or fuck off.