This is a frightening prospect because Helion is the innermost of
the three major planets in orbit
around Nemesis, the
brown dwarf at the center of this
incoming mini-constellation.

Ergo, if this really is Helion, it's
pretty darn close.

That being said, this report can only be
construed as preliminary, and is by no means conclusive.

The Helion
Video
This below video was posted by Dill Martin on Dec 20, 2015 on
his Youtube.com channel with a description (shown below) in which he
attributes the video to a "jeff p, all."

The actual channel is 'jeff P'. The
provenance on this extreme zoom video is so poor that the claims of
the maker of this video cannot be substantiated nor are we able to
determine if the video equipment is reliable.

Yet, this video does present us with
some compellingly credible attributes that I will explain in my
analysis below.

Dill Martin

December 20, 2015
This amazing footage
of Nibiru, or one of its moons,
was filmed in California just a few hours ago.

This footage is among some of the
best what has been filmed recently. This video was made and
created by 'jeff p', all credit and thanks go to him, please
subscribe to his you tube channel.

"Copyright Disclaimer Under
Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for
- fair use - for purposes such as criticism, comment, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by
copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in
favor of fair use."

No money is, or ever will be, made
from any of my publications.

Is this a
Natural Celestial Object?
There are three reasons why this object of interest could be
Helion:

lack of surface features

size

brightness

However, before we delve into those
issues, we must address a more relevant issue. Is this a natural
celestial object?

In studying the video you will see that our Planet Helion candidate
moves with the sun in a natural manner behind tree branches, first
on the left side and then the right. There are also numerous lens
aberrations which are pointed out by the original maker of this
video.

So in terms of movement, we're moving in
the right direction.

However, to truly to determine if an object is a natural object or a
lens aberration, we at yowusa.com use what I call a "gamma test."
While this is not an absolute test, we have found it to be highly
reliable because gamma tests show us if an object is hot or cold.
This is critical because hot objects generate light and cold objects
do not.

So why is this important?

Natural objects like our sun are hot objects. They create the light
we seeing through the camera lens. On the other hand, lens flares
and other aberrations are cold objects. They do not create light.
Rather, they redirect it from other sources that do create light.

So the whole point of a gamma test is to
factor out misleading cold objects, so we can focus our attention on
the hot objects.

Working with an HD 720 version of the video I downloaded, I captured
the following frame for gamma testing.

Helion Gamma Test

The gamma settings in the image shown to
the right are as follows:

Brightness - 10
Contrast - 0
Hue
- 0
Saturation - 0
Gamma - 0.01

What the test shows is that our Helion
candidate is a natural "hot" object.

Of particular interest is the tree
branch in the foreground. If you compare the candidate with the sun,
there is a marked gradient similarity. Another thing we found quite
interesting are the gamma differences between the branch, stems, and
leaves.

So assuming this is a natural object,
then what could it be?

Why this
Object of Interest Could be Helion
There are three reasons why this object of interest could be
Helion:

lack of surface features

size

brightness

One of the common debunking attacks
we've see over the last year is the "lack of surface features"
argument that presumes that an object of interest must, like our
Moon, present clearly distinguishable surface features.

Because there are no distinguishable surface features on our Helion
candidate object, this confirms with clear certainty that it is not
our moon - a known object.

What about it being an unknown object?
The original video maker claims this object of interest is a moon of Nibiru.

Our analysis shows that it could in fact
be the Planet Helion in the Planet X System as described in my book,
Being In It for the Species: The Universe Speaks, as noted
below.

Being in It for the Species

by Marshall MastersPage 23-24

"Planet Helion is a small,
bright, uninhabited planet."

"As a means of determining the various planets' internal
composition, we further learned that Helion is bright
because it is a small gas giant."

"Upon learning that Helion is a small gas giant, we further
learned that it is seen much like a small sun, from the
surface of Nibiru. "

"Helion is bright because it is a small gas giant."

If Helion is indeed a small gas giant,
the debunker expectation of clearly distinguishable surface features
does not apply.

Also, size plays a role here as well.
In Being In It for the Species the size of Helion is given as
3.5 times the size of Earth (3.5 XE). Does this size qualify to be
"a small gas giant?"

Yes, if you consider the fact that Neptune, a
known gas giant in our own system is 3.9 times bigger than the
Earth.

Planet X
System

Major Planets

In the illustration above, Helion is
shown as the innermost of the three major planets in the Planet X
system, where Nibiru is the outermost.

So if ourHelion candidate is in
fact Helion, this means
that Nemesis, the brown dwarf star
at the heart of the Planet X System, is nearing perihelion, its
closest distance to the sun.

After that, the guacamole starts
to hit to the fan.

A Call for
Additional Observations
When people send a picture and say nothing more than "what's this?"

I usually do not waste any time
responding, let alone looking at the images.

In the recent video, "Planet X System
Update for November 2015 No. 1 - Major Update No. 3" (below video),
it is explain at 27 minutes in, the five-step evaluation process and
exactly how to do our tests.

If the man who made this video had taken the time to think through
the details of his post it would have far more useful.

The lack of detailed information in
these types of videos, such as the provenance of the video, makes
them easy to discredit. It also makes it easier for anyone with an
interest
in Planet X research to be
trivialized and sidelined as "hysterical nutters."

I'm not only asking for additional observation videos, I'm asking
you to think it through so that you can give the public a truly
useful reporting.

Following a few guidelines will give
these reports a credibility appropriate to the seriousness of the
impending consequences of the Planet X System flyby.

I explain exactly how to capture quality
still photos and videos and post them credibly the first time in the
video, Planet X System Update for November 2015 No. 1 - Major
Update No. 3 (above video).

If you see something worth reporting,
capture it the right way and make a credible report.