Sunday, August 17, 2014

Another Francis interview by atheist Scalfari

We here at Call Me Jorge... know this is late but it is difficult keeping up with Francis. We can't believe people keep falling for the same tricks over and over. Recently, on 10 July 2014, Francis granted another interview to Eugenio Scalfari. The Vatican and its Novus Ordo apologists have gone into full spin mode. One hears such things as,

"Scalfari doesn't keep notes and he is an old man losing his mind, etc..."

How can anyone take these excuses seriously? Did Francis not invite this atheist back for a third interview? His first rate pro-sodomy public relations machine logically told Francis how the interviews were being received. So why does Francis keep repeating the same behavior if his words are being misconstrued? When one plays the card game poker, one needs to always know who the fool is. If one doesn't know who the fool is then more often than not they are the fool. Francis loves playing his followers for fools. It is all part of his humble act.

3 comments:

I think Pope Francis understands the Mafia mentality very well with their criminal activity and religious practices if his treatment of the Franciscan Friars & Sisters Immaculata is any indication. He may as well excommunicate himself.

He's already excommunicated himself for heresy and apostasy, if he was ever someone who held the Catholic Faith to begin with, which, with most of these Vatican II papal usurpers and the other clerical 'leaders' in the novus ordo would be a hard task proving at this point. The old priest told Bill Strojie when he saw who was gathering for Vatican Council II "two thousand good for nothings that don't believe in the Holy Trinity or the Immaculate Conception" or something very much like that, wasn't really far off on his assessment of the hierarchy at that time - and of course it's only gotten worse since the 1960s. May Christ our Lord deliver the remnant Faithful soon from all of this horrifying nonsense.

For one thing, the word pederasty ought be used but, more importantly, the use of pedophilia to describe sodomites in the clergy is a deceptive sophism in that pedophilia is used as a synecdoche; that is, pedophilia is a teeny part of the sodomitic clergy which is intended to represent all of the sodomitic clergy.

The vast majority of the sex crimes committed against innocent adolescent males was committed by sodomites, not pederasts, but owing to the acceptance of the sodomisation of society (including the perfect society, the Church) those who succor sodomites use pedophilia to describe those perverts because, at least for the time being, pedophilia is still morally proscribed.

Be wary of the sophistical synecdoche, pedophilia, for behind that ugly mask is a smiley sodomite seeking to subvert the perfect society.

What? You didm;t know that all sodomites are subversive?

Take a look around at the world. ANY organization that accepts sodomites is asking for its doctrines/creed/principles to be subverted for no sodomite is going to continue to engage in his perversion while the organization he is part of is allowed to condemn his behavior; he will work to subvert that which he is allowed to participate in.