John McCain Was For Trading Taliban Prisoners For Sgt. Bergdahl Before He Was Against It

In the days since Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was freed from Taliban captivity in exchange for five prisoners held at the prison at Guantanamo Bay, one of the strongest critics of the deal has been Arizona Senator John McCain:

“These are the hardest of the hard core. These are the highest high-risk people, and others that we have released have gone back into the fight,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in an interview on “Face the Nation,” adding that he was disturbed the Taliban named the prisoners they wanted in exchange for Bergdahl’s freedom.

“We need to know more information about the conditions of where they are going to be,” McCain added. “It is disturbing that these individuals would have the ability to reenter the fight.”

(…)

For McCain, the chief concern is what will happen to the detainees once they are released.

“If they reenter the fight then it is going to put American lives at risk and none of us want that to happen…if they are able to have after a year in Qatar to do whatever they want to do there’s no doubt they will reenter the fight,” he said.

Sen. John McCain says he now would be inclined to support trading a Taliban prisoner held at Guantanamo Bay for a U.S. soldier held captive in Afghanistan.

In 2012, McCain called the idea of negotiating with the Taliban “bizarre” and “highly questionable,” but on Tuesday he said on CNN’s ”Anderson Cooper 360″ that he would be open to a swap now being discussed.

U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl has been held by a group with ties to the Taliban for almost four years, and the group has demanded the United States release five Taliban prisoners in exchange for him.

The Washington Post reported that U.S. officials confirmed that talks among diplomats and the Pentagon were under way. The official U.S. policy is not to negotiate with terrorists, but the military is winding down operations there by the end of the year and could risk leaving Bergdahl behind, CNN noted.

McCain said his stance has changed only because the previous proposal was to release five “hard-core” Taliban leaders as a “confidence-building measure.” The current proposal would be an actual exchange of prisoners.

“I would be inclined to support such a thing, depending on a lot of details,” he said.

@C. Clavin: I was really young and I don’t recall the details. I watched the arrival of his batch of POWs on TV. The war was over for us. It was a big deal on all of the networks. It was moving even for a kid. Most of the men looked like they’d been hurt and then kept in a dungeon for years.

Oh look, it’s Pretend That We’re Principled Time again in Washington, yay!

John McCain is almost – almost – a parody of himself by now. All it would take to push him into jump-the-shark territory would be if he won the GOP nomination for president and proposed that Sarah Palin be his running mate.

Doesn’t this kind of throw water on the argument that the President did this in strict secrecy and never notified Congress? From what I’ve seen, this exact deal was discussed with them in January and they knew it could be forthcoming. While it may not have happened within the 30 days specified by the bill, you can’t say Congress knew nothing about it.

The official U.S. policy is not to negotiate with terrorists, but the military is winding down operations there by the end of the year and could risk leaving Bergdahl behind, CNN noted.

The Taliban aren’t terrorists. Not unless we’re equating “people who shelter terrorists” with terrorists themselves. And even if they were, the maxim that we don’t negotiate with terrorists has been proven wrong long before Obama’s time.

@humanoid.panda:
Sorry, was trying to clean up edits and timed out.
It starts with @Jenos Idanian #13: , traverses a couple of threads and is continuing @Jenos Idanian #13: . His complete inability to admit he is flat out wrong is a bit amusing.