tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-75847279063115033762014-10-04T17:57:57.473-07:00max mooreMMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-85838294987372724242011-01-12T17:40:00.000-08:002011-01-12T18:27:51.895-08:00Summary 5 (6 & 7)Slavoj Zizek's essay Rumsfeld's Unknown Known is about America's hypocrisy in dealing with war crimes. Zizek specifically focuses on the Abu Ghraib torture photographs. He compares the torture to performance art and American hazing rituals. He points out many of the American government's obvious lies and weird defensive tactics. Zizek contrasts America and Iraq, saying that Iraq is brutal and direct where America hides under the guise of defending itself.<br /><br />I actually thought this was an interesting article even though I'm not interested in politics. Torture is interesting. It is also interesting to point out how these issues are responded to by the government. Politics are definitely a performance.<br /><br />The next essay is "Among the Inept" by Erica Goode, which is about a study showing that people who do badly at things being more confident than people who do things well. It basically just goes down the list of things. It was pretty funny, it reminded me of a lot of people here at school, probably myself included.<br /><br />I honestly had trouble watching the Frontline Digital Nation video. A bunch of regular people talking about their technology addiction on camera was too embarrassingly hilarious for me to handle.MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-12393684753743709022011-01-12T16:25:00.000-08:002011-01-12T16:35:00.955-08:00Summary 4Walter Benjamin's 1936 essay, "Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" is about the affects of mechanical reproduction on art. This means an art object can be viewed where it is actually not physically present. Benjamin says that this causes the actual object to lose the aura it once had. Benjamin talks at length about the role of film and photography in this.<br /><br />Reading this now is quite strange considering that mechanical reproduction seems like the only way most people see anything. I do relate to his idea of a work losing its aura once it is reproduced, it definitely can't compare to seeing in person.<br /><br />1. Does mechanical reproduction make artwork lose its aura?<br />2. How would a current essay on this topic be different?<br />3. Is this something artists should care about now?MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-64196838046157960992011-01-12T15:43:00.000-08:002011-01-12T15:43:13.083-08:00Summary 3Roland Barthes' 1977 essay, "Death of the Author" is against literary works being interpreted based on their author. Barthes believes that work should be looked at without having to directly connect it with the author. This essay reminded me of "Against Interpretation" in that each article suggests that work should be able to stand on its own without being reduced to the interpretations of others.<br /><br />I personally think it is impossible to completely separate the creator from their creation, but they are not the same thing. I don't think it is necessary to know an artist to be able to appreciate or understand their art. Works of art should be able to stand without the artist who made them. I trust a work of art more than an artist.<br /><br />1. What if all art was anonymous?<br />2. Is it possible to separate an artist from their work?<br />3. Should we care who work is created by?MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-19062826887124959182011-01-12T15:15:00.000-08:002011-01-12T15:15:47.155-08:00Summary 2In the interview from 1997 Agnes Martin says that the only think you need to know is what you want. She says that she doesn't have any ideas, just inspiration. She says that art today has too many ideas. She thinks that education is wrong because the focus is on being superior, capable, and ambitious instead of what you are actually doing. She says that everyone knows that art comes from inspiration but they try to make it seem more complex. She says that music is the highest form of art, purely abstract and not intellectual. She doesn't think there is anything you can say about art. She says that you have to be modest. She doesn't think that artists deserve any credit. She says the worst thing you can think about is yourself.<br /><br />I think it's very refreshing to see an artist that's been working forever speak the way she spoke in this interview. She really seemed to have found a lot of peace and understanding with herself. It was nice to see her completely downplay and reject the importance of ideas, conceptualism, and intellectualism. I agree that art is too focused on too many ideas. I too agree that the ideas and origins behind art are much more simple than most artists would like to make it seem.<br /><br />1. Have ideas replaced art?<br />2. Are most artists liars?<br />3. What is the difference between an idea and inspiration?MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-84331917845675922902011-01-12T14:32:00.000-08:002011-01-12T14:35:06.606-08:00Summary 1In the 1964 essay Against Interpretation, Susan Sontag argues that art should not be interpreted. Sontag is against the idea of interpretation because she believes that the true meaning of art is the art itself. Sontag believes that interpretation takes people's minds off of the art. She doesn't agree with the idea that art is something that must be translated into a clear idea. Sontag seems to believe that when people interpret art, they only believe the interpretation and not the art. Sontag argues that in art, interpretation has always failed. Sontag believes that we should see art for what it is, not what we think it is.<br /><br />I have never had the urge to interpret artwork. I appreciated this article because I think that too much emphasis is put on the ideas behind artwork. I certainly don't think about interpretation while I'm creating my work.<br /><br />1. Why do people feel the urge to interpret artwork?<br />2. Can art exist without interpretation?<br />3. Why are the ideas more important than the work itself?MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-71594126397874179442010-09-23T19:10:00.000-07:002011-01-12T13:36:24.890-08:00Statement.The only thing that everything has in common is that it is all part of life.<br /><br />I'm not interested in ordering the disorder or explaining the unexplainable.<br /><br />I don't believe that what an artist says about themselves or their work will help others understand what they are doing.<br /><br />I don't believe that art is to be understood or that we should demand that it be explained.<br /><br />An imagination is something that reveals itself spontaneously.MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-49964442187708246592010-09-14T17:12:00.000-07:002010-10-07T06:14:21.426-07:00"Why..."<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">I am going to art school because I did not know what else to do. My art has always naturally been part of me. My earliest memories are of myself drawing on my mom's coffee table. Art became what I consciously wanted to do when I realized that it was what I was already doing. My art is all that I have to give, it is my only talent. My art honestly hasn't changed much from my earliest memories of life to being a senior in college. My art is about the way I look at the world. My art and my reasons for doing it come from my inability to make sense out of life.</div>MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7584727906311503376.post-81897774791463522582010-09-07T10:47:00.000-07:002010-09-07T11:44:46.006-07:00I'll get back to you on the timeline<div class="MsoNormal">For my thesis project I am going to continue creating series of drawings. I am going to experiment more within my style. Each series will exist within its own world. This will involve different materials for each series. I will not be planning ahead what materials will be used or any other specifics; these are things that I will figure out when the time is right. Some constants will be mechanical pencil and paper, though there may be alterations within these parameters. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">I would consider my research to be observation and thought. All the time I am planning, getting ideas, transforming them, making sense out of them. All of my drawings come from observation. I see the world as an abstracted and distorted place, which is why my art appears this way. There is no way of turning off the mind. All of my thoughts are being brought into my work. </div><div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal">I will be using different materials other than just pencil and paper when I feel that it is necessary for a specific series. I would like to think more about surface and color than I have in the past. I would also like to think more about having the size of my pieces fluctuate from larger or smaller than they have been in the past. I am planning on making each series a unified piece of work. For this reason I do not know how many pieces will be in a given series, how large each piece will be, or what materials will be used. I will be actively pursuing the idea of each series being different from the last.</div>MMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07139825745746106156noreply@blogger.com0