Please note: we have been online over ten years, and we want The Trek BBS to continue as a free site. But if you block our ads we are at risk.Please consider unblocking ads for this site - every ad you view counts and helps us pay for the bandwidth that you are using. Thank you for your understanding.

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

You know, I bet Amy's presence as the Doctor's conscience would have worked better if the Pond's appearance were more scattered. The Doctor is clearly going out and having lots of adventures in between Pond visits, and it is starting to affect his character and his moral compass. Killing Mr. Filch (or whatever his name was) last week...parading Jex to his death this week.... I kind of wish we could be seeing some of these other Doctor adventures to get a better idea of just why this is happening.

I just get the impression that there is a lot we're supposed to infer from these episodes without having a whole lot of information to go on.

I'm getting vibes of the Time Lord Victorious "arc" we saw in the Tennant specials that ultimately led to his downfall.

I'm getting vibes of the Time Lord Victorious "arc" we saw in the Tennant specials that ultimately led to his downfall.

All leading up to Matt Smiths Doctor changing his behavior once the new companion comes in

Less Twirly Whirly Doctor and more Old Man with 1200 years of knowledge.

Saul wrote:

Bleeding cool noticed that the title sequence is gradually getting darker. Glad it's on purpose as it was starting look like someone was playing with the contrast too much. Another interesting point was the lights flickering as they do in Weeping Angel episodes....

The lights have been flickering in each episode so far

Amys dressing mirror bulbs were flickering before she was taken by the Daleks, 2nd ep Rory and Brian are changing a light bulb at the start and Rory completes the task at the end and in this episode the bulbs are flickering again a few times.

Location: Ouch! Forgotten already? You were just down there 20 minutes ago.

Re: 7X03 A Town Called Mercy (Grading/Discussion) (SPOILERS!)

Mr. Adventure wrote:

RoJoHen wrote:

I just get the impression that there is a lot we're supposed to infer from these episodes without having a whole lot of information to go on.

I think you may be right. Under Moffat sometimes I feel the dramatic beats are sometimes erratic, sometimes they're missing when you'd expect them and sometimes they seem to pop up unannounced.

Agreed. There's this weird tendency to unexpectedly ellipses out huge chunks of time. Like, when Amy & Rory suddenly weren't traveling with the Doctor anymore at the beginning of "The Impossible Astronaut." Or the months long gap between "The Impossible Astronaut" & "Day of the Moon." Now, sometimes that can be used to good surprise effect, like the sudden revelation of Amy & Rory's divorce in "Asylum of the Daleks." But other times, it just feels weird.

Overall, I liked "A Town Called Mercy." I thought it was a nice little twist and an interesting moral dilemma. The production values were pretty good. The guest cast had much better American accents than we usually get from the show. I like Ben Browder & his powerful mustache. (I wish he had been in the episode more.) Not a whole lot for Rory to do, sadly. But I guess my biggest critique of the episode was its unnecessary tendency to keep underlining its main themes & conflicts (including an "Inside Look" on BBC America that basically just shows interviews with the actors describing the exact scene we were just watching).

Mostly, I just hope this will shut up all of the fans that were whining last week about how the show never does any "serious" episodes anymore.

But in the end, to me, it's not really a Doctor Who western unless it endlessly repeats a stupid, cloying, insidiously catchy ditty.

__________________Kegg: "You're a Trekkie. The capacity to quibble over the minutiae of space opera films is your birthright."

To everyone saying that the Ponds weren't important to the story, maybe I'm not remembering but didn't Amy serve as the Doctor's conscience making him remember his morality. I thought that was the most important scene in the episode and it featured Amy at least.

Thing is Amy wasn't really needed for that. That scene could have featured any companion and it would be the same. Hey, it could have carried more resonance with a former companion seeing the Doctor become this dark and uncaring.

My bigger problem than Amy's role is why it's needed. The Doctor's moral compass being off just doesn't feel like it's come about organically and authentically (IMO). I don't feel they've earned those story beats and it doesn't help that they've already mined that territory better before.

My bigger problem than Amy's role is why it's needed. The Doctor's moral compass being off just doesn't feel like it's come about organically and authentically (IMO). I don't feel they've earned those story beats and it doesn't help that they've already mined that territory better before.

Yeah I admit it did feel a bit forced. But then, the Doctor has always been prone to occassional tempers or bad attitudes for no apparent reason. So I wasn't that thrown off by it.

Thing is Amy wasn't really needed for that. That scene could have featured any companion and it would be the same. Hey, it could have carried more resonance with a former companion seeing the Doctor become this dark and uncaring.

So true. I mean, if he can pop back and pick up a big game hunter, or queen Nefertiti for a quick trip, theres no reason a old companion couldn't tag along for 'one last adventure'. Jo would have been perfect for this.

__________________"The way I see it, every life is a pile of good things and bad things. The good things don't always soften the bad things. But vice versa, the bad things don't necessarily spoil the good things or make them unimportant."

My bigger problem than Amy's role is why it's needed. The Doctor's moral compass being off just doesn't feel like it's come about organically and authentically (IMO). I don't feel they've earned those story beats and it doesn't help that they've already mined that territory better before.

That's exactly my issue with it. "This is what happens when you travel alone for too long" would have had a much better impact if we had actually seen him travel alone for too long. As it is, the Doctor's character development is being handed to us in the form of dialogue and exposition.

I found the episode scattered and dull. No one stood out, the story felt particularly unoriginal, and I found myself pausing and going off to do other things more than once. I'd put the blame firmly at the feet of the plot here.

Well it came on after the Strictly launch show so it would have been worrying if the overnights hadn't been higher than the previous week. Possibly we'll see less of a timeshift but it should manage 8-8.5m at least when the finals are in.

To everyone saying that the Ponds weren't important to the story, maybe I'm not remembering but didn't Amy serve as the Doctor's conscience making him remember his morality. I thought that was the most important scene in the episode and it featured Amy at least.

Thing is Amy wasn't really needed for that. That scene could have featured any companion and it would be the same. Hey, it could have carried more resonance with a former companion seeing the Doctor become this dark and uncaring.

That's a very good point. I think that's what they were trying to do with Amy. However, because we didn't experience that gap, it lost its impact. However, for any past companion where there has been a significant gap in screen time, that would be a great contrast.