Customizing search and browse - For customization of the browse interface this will allow administrators to define what controlled vocabulary is used. For customization of the search, the administrator will be able to select which metadata fields are searched.

Boolean search and browse: there will be options for both for AND and OR and a drop down or radio button will be used to select which one to use.

Validators will be able to edit catalog values which have been set as “visible. but not editable.”

Suggestion [ESA]: There's no way to include authors in the workflow, and they should be included since after their submission is reviewed, they'll need to make edits to their submissions. And they should be able to see the reviewers' and editor's comments when they do this, but not the reviewers' names. Also, reviewers should not be able to see each other. Authors should have the ability to modify file, ability to crop or change the photo, and change the metadata. Versioning of files is ideal, but not necessary.

Suggestion [ESA]: Administrators should be able to move records in and out of the peer review workflow. For example, there are some submissions which need to be just kicked out of the review process because they are not acceptable for review at all.

Comment [Isovera]: where would you want those records to show up?

Comment [ESA]: Not sure, whatever works; it's more about the ability rather than the process.

Comment [Isovera]: One possible place could be in “Saved as Draft” section under the validation stages page.

Suggestion [ESA]: There's no way to delete submissions once they're in the peer review system without fully reviewing them. This means any test records I send through and any submissions we immediately decide are not appropriate are just cluttering up the system.

Suggestion [ESA]: Any edit to the peer review process duplicates the peer review process. This is going to get really unwieldy over time, and it means that if I change the peer review process to address a current problem, I have to re-submit any records that were pending before I edited the review process. And I can't remove those original records from peer review without going through a fake review to get them to the data validation stage.

Comment [Isovera]: possible functionality to delete a peer review workflow when all the records have been completed for that workflow.