Obviously bad feet have like, wierd stuff growing on them and shit, but what is the difference between just like, healthy ordinary feet and "amazing feet". I really don't think I could tell the difference.

what's sexy about sniffing used underwear? i mean no disrespect to the ladies, but the smell down there is tolerable at best (which, if the girl is clean, it is perfectly tolerable) and kind of rank at its worst. and i figure its worst is exactly what these panty sniffers want. i'm not being sexist either, could any girls seriously imagine masturbating with a stinky pair of y-fronts smooshed into your face? ugh.

i guess i just don't get it. with other fetishes i get it, it's just not for me. this, i cannot understand.

rly? you 'get' /all/ other fetishes, and it's just /this/ one that you don't 'get'? don't make me attempt the impossible task of attempting to list everyconcievable fetish.

what i'm getting at here is that every time something a bit kinky crops up (on DiS) there will be someone/a few people who feel the need to explain how they're not a prude, and that they 'get' /other/ fetishes (and by that, i can only assume they largely mean pretty mainstream slap-n-tickle). but this particular one is the weird one. /this/ kink is just one step beyond their ken.

if you don't 'get' a kink, it's probably not going to be something that can be explained and rationalised to you.

i have actually seen a wide range of disturbing fetishes and i usually understand the logic behind them. this one is comparatively tame but i struggle with the logic, like i'd get it if they had the girl physically force the smell into their face. if it's just because they're so desperate for sexual female contact, why shitty pants and not perfume? i think people just take panty sniffing as a fairly common fetish but i'm sure it's weirder than it seems.