It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,1 it was the New York Times. Specifically, it was a Times article that discussed computer programs and other techniques designed to root out plagiarism.2 The article revealed that there is now software that can look for a lengthy passage, like a string of pearls,3 in a new document that is identical to a passage in a previously published work. In another method, every fifth word from sample passages is removed, and the author has to fill in the blanks4 to reveal his or her familiarity with the work. These high-tech ways to spot literary theft will surely rob copycats of the sleep that knits up the raveled sleave of care.5

When I first read the Times article, I remember thinking, it's a good thing6 and attention must be paid.7 After all, as a writer, I find plagiarism to be a constant concern. (Although from time to time, I have to admit, I shall consider it.8) Of course, it can be hard to define. When you steal from one author, it's plagiarism; if you steal from many, it's research.9 One might say that a writer should neither a borrower nor a lender be.10 On the other hand, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.11

I shall never believe that God plays dice with the world.12 Therefore, the plagiarized passages that programs pinpoint are probably purposeful and potentially punishable.13 There is grandeur in this view of life.14 I think.15

Plagiarism is a central issue of science16 as well. Relying on the work of others is the lifeblood of scientific research. Indeed, if I (who had the chance to learn physics that Newton never dreamed of) have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.17 One might even say that I have always depended on the kindness of strangers18 in this regard.

But employing the findings of other researchers is one thing; claiming such findings as one's own is intellectual murder most foul.19 So when in the course of human events,20 a case of plagiarism is revealed, it represents a clear and present danger21 to intellectual liberty. And naturally, eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.22 It is thus incumbent on all researchers to say, “Let me make this perfectly clear23: I am not a crook.24”

References
1. Dickens, Charles.A Tale of Two Cities, opening lines.

2. Eakin, Emily.
“Stop, Historians! Don't Copy That Passage! Computers Are Watching!” in the New York Times, January 26, 2002.

16. “Science” refers to the enterprise by which human beings attempt to discover basic truths about the universe. It is, however, also the name of a journal published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

17. Attributed to Isaac Newton but probably existed in some form earlier.

22. Phillips, Wendell.
1852 speech to the Massachusetts Antislavery Society, paraphrasing John Philpot Curran, who in 1790 said, “The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance.”

Scientific American is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us). Scientific American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers.