Last week's Supreme Court ruling striking down the ban on direct corporate spending in elections could allow overseas corporations -- even those controlled by foreign governments -- to pour money into U.S. elections, supporters of campaign-finance regulation warn.

Last week's Supreme Court ruling striking down the ban on direct corporate spending in elections could allow overseas corporations -- even those controlled by foreign governments -- to pour money into U.S. elections, supporters of campaign-finance regulation warn.

like they did for Clinton and Gore?

I guess being fat and ugly isn't enough for the powder monkey - hes got to be an asshole too. (RvW)

If you're so right about all this, why do you have to keep making shit up?

What's made up?

Don't have time to dig into this right now (and I will soon) but I heard on the radio or a news show that in arguments before the Supremes government lawyers had to admit that the old law also applied to BOOKS (that meet the same requirements).