Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
> Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected
> without a proxy.
I don't quite understand this statement. Were you connected to the XO-1.5
over the internet, using a technique like X forwarding or VNC?
> The principal user-perception experience where improvement would
> still be welcome is video support. Changes to the screen (e.g.,
> show/hide Frame) are not being done "smoothly". And when viewing
> "moving pictures", the currently scanty hardware acceleration (e.g.,
> ticket #9407) is noticeable.
In the case of a remote desktop session over the internet, video
performance is almost always limited by the network and protocol, not the
server hardware's rendering speed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091016/05a92a04/attachment.pgp