It begs the question. Would anyone launching this type attack let themselves be caught red-handed at the crime scene with weapons indicating their involvement?

Ukraine's security service claimed various other Khakov "terror attacks" were plotted. It didn't take long for Kiev ro blame Russia.

These type incidents raise suspicions. Take nothing at face value. Most obvious is who gains? Who loses?

Russia and rebels for sure have nothing to gain from this type attack. Kiev and Washington benefit plenty by irresponsibly blaming adversaries for their own crimes - with lots of presstitute media help.

The reliable Colonel Cassad site said ceasefire was only possible if junta forces stopped shelling and refrained from "provocations" like Sunday's attack.

"We didn't have to wait long," said CS. Because Devaltsevo "is off the agenda, bloody provocations are needed to support the" long-running conflict.

"The first of these already happened (on Sunday) in Kharkov." At 2:00PM local time, a memorial service was scheduled for Maidan victims.

Russia and rebels want conflict ended, not escalated. It defies logic to suspect their involvement in what happened. CS put it this way:

"(S)uch actions are clearly beneficial for those who are interested in the increase of the intensity of the conflict and in the escalation of the hybrid war with the goal of sabotaging the Minsk agreements."

"The motive is quite clear here. I'm absolutely sure that this is not the last such actions."

Post-Minsk II, Kiev irresponsibly accused rebels and Russia of "preparing an offensive on Kharkov and Mariupol."