This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Sensitive detection of sensory-evoked neuronal activation is a key to mechanistic
understanding of brain functions. Since immediate early genes (IEGs) are readily induced
in the brain by environmental changes, tracing IEG expression provides a convenient
tool to identify brain activity. In this study we used in situ hybridization to detect
odor-evoked induction of ten IEGs in the mouse olfactory system. We then analyzed
IEG induction in the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel subunit A2 (Cnga2)-null mice to visualize residual neuronal activity following odorant exposure since
CNGA2 is a key component of the olfactory signal transduction pathway in the main
olfactory system.

Results

We observed rapid induction of as many as ten IEGs in the mouse olfactory bulb (OB)
after olfactory stimulation by a non-biological odorant amyl acetate. A robust increase
in expression of several IEGs like c-fos and Egr1 was evident in the glomerular layer, the mitral/tufted cell layer and the granule
cell layer. Additionally, the neuronal IEG Npas4 showed steep induction from a very low basal expression level predominantly in the
granule cell layer. In Cnga2-null mice, which are usually anosmic and sexually unresponsive, glomerular activation
was insignificant in response to either ambient odorants or female stimuli. However,
a subtle induction of c-fos took place in the OB of a few Cnga2-mutants which exhibited sexual arousal. Interestingly, very strong glomerular activation
was observed in the OB of Cnga2-null male mice after stimulation with either the neutral odor amyl acetate or the
predator odor 2, 3, 5-trimethyl-3-thiazoline (TMT).

Conclusions

This study shows for the first time that in vivo olfactory stimulation can robustly
induce the neuronal IEG Npas4 in the mouse OB and confirms the odor-evoked induction of a number of IEGs. As shown
in previous studies, our results indicate that a CNGA2-independent signaling pathway(s)
may activate the olfactory circuit in Cnga2-null mice and that neuronal activation which correlates to behavioral difference
in individual mice is detectable by in situ hybridization of IEGs. Thus, the in situ
hybridization probe set we established for IEG tracing can be very useful to visualize
neuronal activity at the cellular level.

Keywords:

Background

Chemosensory cues from the environment are detected by the peripheral nervous system
which then transmits sensory information to the central nervous system and activates
discrete neuronal ensembles. Studies on patterns of neuronal activation provide useful
insights into roles of different neuronal population and brain regions in regulating
distinct animal behaviors. IEG expression is induced rapidly when neurons are activated
by membrane depolarization, seizure or some sensory signals
[1] and the expression pattern of IEGs is a convenient tool for visualization of neuronal
activities
[2-4]. Neuronal IEGs comprise of several categories including transcription factors (c-fos, Fosb, c-jun, Junb, Egr1, Egr2, Egr3, Npas4, Nr4a1, Nr4a2, etc.) and postsynaptic proteins (Arc, Homer1a, etc.). Previous studies which used long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term enhancement
paradigm indicated that different IEGs have different thresholds for transcriptional
induction; c-fos, for instance, has a high threshold compared to that of Egr1[5,6]. Guzowski et al., (2001) found a higher responsiveness of Arc than that of c-fos and Egr1 in the rat hippocampus after spatial learning
[7].

Olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) in the main olfactory epithelium (MOE) can detect
a vast array of odorous molecules by the olfactory receptors (ORs)
[8]. OSNs make synapses directly to second-order neurons in the central nervous system.
Each OSN projects to a single glomerulus and the OSNs which express a particular OR
usually converge to a single glomerulus both in the medial and lateral halves of the
OB and thus OB glomeruli form a topographical map of ORs
[9,10]. Consequently, afferent inputs through OSNs trigger activity in the OB which is often
traced by specific induction of IEGs. However, it should be noted that in addition
to peripheral stimulation, centrifugal inputs can significantly influence the pattern
of activity in the OB, particularly in the granule cell layer
[11-14].

Interaction of odorants with ORs in vertebrate OSNs activates the olfaction-specific
G protein (Golf) which in turn stimulates other components of the signaling cascades including the
adenylyl cyclase type III (ACIII) and the olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated channel
(CNGC)
[15]. Previous knockout mice studies have confirmed that the cAMP signaling pathway plays
the key role for detection of odorants
[16,17]. Belluscio et al. (1998) reported that most Golf-deficient mice showed neonatal mortality
[17]. In addition, electro-olfactogram (EOG) recordings, which measure electrical activity
detected by an electrode placed on the olfactory epithelium, indicated severe reduction
in odor-evoked response in Golf-deficient mice
[17]. The odorant-induced EOG response was found to be completely ablated and the odorant-dependent
avoidance learning was impaired in ACIII mutant mice
[18]. The mice which have mutation in the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel subunit A2 (Cnga2) gene also show general anosmia
[19]. In 1 day-old Cnga2-mutants there was no detectable EOG response even when the olfactory epithelium was
exposed to complex olfactory stimuli such as mouse urine (conspecific odor cues) or
coyote urine (predator odor cues)
[19]. Behavioral studies in adult Cnga2-null male mice showed that they fail to mate or fight and it is suggested that the
MOE has an essential role in regulating these social behaviors
[20]. Although the mutant male mice failed to show preference for female urine
[20], it remains unclear whether the female urine odor activated the OB glomeruli or not.
Intriguingly, Lin et al. (2004) showed that several odorants, including putative pheromones, were behaviorally
detected by the Cnga2-null mice and electrophysiological and immunohistochemical studies revealed that those
odors indeed produced responses in the MOE, OB and piriform cortex (PC) in the mutants
[21].

For mapping neuronal activity using IEGs two important criteria should be the low
basal expression and the high induction of the IEG being used. It is also advantageous
to analyze several IEGs since the induction thresholds of IEGs vary depending on the
IEG, the stimulus and the tissue. In this present study we used ISH to analyze expression
patterns of ten IEGs in the mouse brain using different odor stimuli and compared
inducibility and sensitivity of these IEGs for detection of sensory-evoked neuronal
activities. We then asked how disruption of the cAMP signaling cascade in the olfactory
pathway affects neuronal activation using Cnga2-null male mice which show general anosmia and sexual deficits. We exposed the mutants
to different odorants including a predator odor and female odors to observe behavioral
responses and the pattern of brain activities mediated by any CNGA2-independent olfactory
signaling pathway(s) using ISH of IEGs.

Results

To visualize neuronal activities in response to environmental changes we used ISH
of activity-dependent genes in the mouse brain following presentation of odor stimuli.
To minimize the level of ambient odorants, test animals were kept under overhead air
flow for 2 h before the odorant exposure. The mice which were sacrificed immediately
after the 2-h air exposure were treated as controls, the ‘Odorant (−)’ group. IEG
expression levels were found to be very low in control mice (Figure
1A1-J1, A1’-J1’, Figure
2). For olfactory stimulation we first used amyl acetate since it is a standard nonbiological
odorant which produces strong and repeatable responses
[22,23]. As many as ten IEGs were induced when the mice were exposed to amyl acetate for
25 min (5-min exposures with 5-min intervals) and sacrificed after 30 min from the
odor onset (AA 25 min, air 5 min) (Figure
1A2-J2, A2’-J2’, Figure
2). Expression levels of most of these IEGs decreased substantially within 60 min of
the odor onset (AA 25 min, air 35 min) (Figure
1A3-J3, Figure
2), indicating that the odor-evoked IEG induction was transient. Nevertheless, odorant-induced
higher expression levels of Egr3 (Figure
1E1-E3), Fosb (Figure
1F1-F3) and Nor1 (Figure
1H1-H3) seemed to be sustained at least for 60 min from the initial odor presentation.

Figure 2.Quantification of odor-evoked IEG induction in the mouse OB. Signal intensity (arbitrary unit) of c-fos (A), Egr1 (B) and Npas4 (C) was calculated as the percentage of area positive for ISH signals in respective
layers of the OB. Columns represented mean ± SEM. Seven to eight bulbs (approximately
from + 4.5 mm bregma to + 4 mm bregma) from two to three mice were analyzed. Student's
t-test was performed to compare means. ** Difference between groups was highly significant
(p ≤ 0.01). * Difference between groups was significant (p ≤ 0.05).

The main projection neurons in the mouse OB are the mitral/tufted cells and there
are several types of interneurons such as granule cells and periglomerular cells.
We could visualize activation of spatially segregated glomeruli by the strong c-fos expression in periglomerular cells (arrow, Figure
1A2, A2’) even though the ISH signals spanned the entire glomerular layer. The c-fos mRNA signals were abundant in the mitral/tufted cell layer (black arrowhead, Figure
1A2, A2’) and very dense signals were observed in the superficial aspects of the granule
cell layer (green arrowhead, Figure
1A2, A2’). Similarly, we observed robust induction of Arc, c-jun, Egr1 and Junb after the odorant exposure (Figure
1). It appeared that at the activated glomeruli the Egr1 induction took place in the majority of periglomerular cells (arrows, Figure
1D2’), whereas, Arc, c-jun and Junb were upregulated in subsets of periglomerular cells (arrows, Figure
1B2’, C2’, G2’, respectively).

In control mice signals of Egr3, Fosb, Nor1, Npas4 and Nr4a1 mRNAs were barely detectable either in the glomerular layer or in the mitral/tufted
cell layer although a small fraction of granule cells were positive for these IEGs
(Figure
1E1,E1’, F1,F1’, H1,H1’, I1,I1’, J1,J1’). After the amyl acetate exposure, significant
induction of these five IEGs was apparent in the granule cell layer (Figure
1E2,E2’, F2,F2’, H2,H2’, I1,I1’, J2,J2’) and sparse signals appeared in a few periglomerular
cells and the mitral/tufted cells (Figure
1J2’, data not shown).

In our subsequent experiments we analyzed induction patterns of c-fos, the most widely used IEG, along with Npas4 since the activity-dependent induction of Npas4 has not been previously reported in the mouse olfactory system. It was interesting
to note that after 30 min of odor onset, Npas4 expression was robustly increased from a very low basal level and then, there was
a steep decline within 60 min of odor onset (Figure
1I1-I3, Figure
2C). Our results indicated that expression patterns of IEGs in the mouse OB varied
considerably at the basal condition and a single session of odorant exposure was sufficient
to induce expression of the ten IEGs we examined.

Different odorants produce differential responses in the mouse brain

The OB glomeruli are spatially organized into the dorsal (DI and DII) and the ventral (V) domains and different odorants activate distinct sets of glomeruli
in mice
[24]. Therefore, we used two different odorants for olfactory stimulation and then observed
the neuronal activation pattern by the ISH of activity-dependent genes. When we exposed
mice to propionic acid, an aliphatic acid with pungent odor, we found that only a
small number of glomeruli were strongly activated at the dorsomedial aspect of the
anterior OB (arrowheads, Figure
3A, A’)
[25,26]. There were strong signals of c-fos mRNAs in periglomerular cells around the glomeruli which were presumed to be specifically
activated by propionic acid. In addition, the induced expression of c-fos was observed in the mitral/tufted cell layer and the granule cell layer below the
activated glomeruli (Figure
3A). Using optical imaging a previous study also showed that propionic acid specifically
activated the anteromedial domain of the mouse OB
[27]. On the other hand, amyl acetate, a strong neutral odorant, activates many glomeruli
both in the dorsal and the ventral OB
[25,28-30]. We also found that amyl acetate robustly induced c-fos expression in a large number of periglomerular cells, mitral/tufted cells and granule
cells in both the dorsal and ventral aspects of the OB (Figure
3B). Induction of Npas4 was evident mainly in the granule cell layer of the OB for both propionic acid and
amyl acetate (Figure
3A’, B’). Accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) neurons were found to respond to the volatile,
conspecific as well as allospecific odor cues
[31,32]. Our results were in agreement with the emerging evidence for the overlapping functions
of the mouse OB and the AOB in processing olfactory cues
[33,34]. Using ISH of IEGs we found that odorants like amyl acetate and propionic acid, which
are not pheromones, induced c-fos expression not only in the OB but also in the AOB (Figure
3A, B, C, D). Induced expressions of Npas4 were evident in the OB (Figure
3A’, B’) for both of these odorants although Npas4 was only slightly induced in the AOB (Figure
3C’, D’, insets). Therefore, these data indicate that the IEG induction patterns we
observed were odorant-specific and by tracing IEG expression using ISH, it is possible
to demarcate brain activities with very high spatial resolution.

Figure 3.Comparison of IEG induction patterns in response to two different odorants. Mice were sacrificed after the 30-min continuous exposure to the test odorant. (A, A’) Propionic acid activated several glomeruli specifically in the dorsal OB (arrowheads
in A). Induced expression of Npas4 was observed only in the granule cell layer (A’, inset). (B, B’) A large number of glomeruli were activated by amyl acetate. Npas4 induction was apparent only in the granule cell layer (B’). (C-D’) Patterns of IEG induction in the AOB after odorant exposure. Arrowheads indicate
c-fos induction in the granule cell layer of the AOB (C, D). Only a slight induction of
Npas4 was observed in the AOB (C’, D’, insets). GL, Glomerular layer; M/T,Mitral/Tufted
cell layer; GC, Granule cell layer; GrA, Granule cell layer of the AOB; EPlA, External
plexiform layer of the AOB. Scale bar: 200 μm.

IEG induction demarcates the flow of olfactory information in the higher order brain
regions

Olfactory information is conveyed to and processed in a number of cortical and subcortical
brain regions including the anterior olfactory nucleus (AON), the PC, the amygdala
and the entorhinal cortex
[8,35]. We found that the increase in the expression of these IEGs in AON (arrows, Figure
4A-B’) paralleled to the activation of OB neurons. It is known that in the PC pyramidal
neurons receive direct input from mitral/tufted cells of the OB. Consequently, odorant
exposure activates unique but overlapping subsets of neurons in the PC
[36]. As expected, we observed odorant-induced increase in expression of IEGs in the layer
2/3 of the PC where cell bodies of pyramidal neurons are located (arrows, Figure
4D, D’).

Owing to the intimate connection between olfaction and memory, the hippocampus has
been of great interest for studying olfactory memory. We found that the exploration
of odor cues only for a brief period significantly induced the expression of several
IEGs in the mouse hippocampus (Figure
4E-F', data not shown). Our ISH data clearly indicate that odor stimulus not only triggered
the robust induction of IEGs in the mouse OB but also conspicuously increased the
expression of these genes in various brain regions which are involved in olfactory
signal processing.

It is interesting that most Cnga2-null male mice show neonatal mortality, general anosmia and deficits in sexual behaviors,
however, a small number of the surviving male mutants can mate successfully
[19,20]. We tested the hypothesis whether the positive sexual behavior observed in some Cnga2-null male mice is correlated with a concurrent activation of the main olfactory system.
In the home cage, mice experience many ambient odorants which are known to produce
dense c-fos mRNA signals in olfactory structures (Figure
5A1)
[28]. First we checked the extent of IEG expression by such ambient odorants in the OB
of male Cnga2-null mice. Figure
5A depicts clear differences between the mutant and the wild type littermates in c-fos induction patterns when the animals were taken from the home cage immediately before
sacrifice. In the OB c-fos expression level was very low in mutants compared to that of wild type littermates
(Figure
5A1,A1’). However, we observed strong c-fos signals in a few isolated glomeruli in the mutant OB (Additional file
1: Figure S1B3). Expectedly, c-fos mRNA signals were practically absent in the AOB (Figure
5A2,A2’) in both the wild type and the mutant mice. Baker et al. (1999) and Lin et al. (2004) previously reported dramatically reduced tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunoreactivity,
a marker for afferent activity, in most of the typical OB glomeruli in CNGA2-deficient
mice
[21,37]. Nevertheless, in mutant mice strong TH staining was evident in a number of discrete
glomeruli including the necklace glomeruli which are found at the posterior OB and
are innervated by OSNs expressing a specific guanyl cyclase (GC-D) and a phosphodiesterase,
PDE2
[21,37,38]. In Cnga2-null mice we observed that Th mRNA expression was also significantly downregulated in most of the glomeruli while
strong expression was retained only in a small number of glomeruli, presumably the
necklace glomeruli (Additional file
1: Figure S1B1, B2). Since CNGA2 is expressed in almost all typical glomeruli, but
not in necklace glomeruli which use cGMP as a second messenger instead of cAMP for
olfactory signal transduction, our results supported the view that the cAMP pathway
plays the key role for activation of the majority of ORNs and that olfaction is highly
attenuated in the Cnga2-null mice
[19,21,37].

Additional file 1.Figure S1. Strong residual activity at the necklace glomeruli in Cnga2-null mice. Figure shows horizontal sections of the OB. Expression of Th, a marker of afferent activity, was significantly reduced in most of the OB glomeruli
in Cnga2-null mice (B1) compared to that of wild type mice (A). However, strong Th expression was observed in a small number of glomeruli (B1, inset), presumably the
necklace glomeruli which express Pde2 (B2, inset). In Cnga2-null mice c-fos expression was almost absent in the OB. However, strong c-fos signals appeared in a few glomeruli (B3, inset). Scale bar: 200 μm.

Figure 5.Individual differences in induction of activity-dependent genes in Cnga2-null mice after exposure to female mice.A. Expression of c-fos in mice which were sacrificed from their home cages without any odorant exposure.
Significantly reduced expression levels of c-fos were observed in the OB (A1’) and AOB (A2’) of Cnga2-null male mice compared to that of wild type male littermates (A1, A2, respectively).
B. Induction of c-fos expression in male mice which were exposed to estrous female mice. Arrowheads indicate
the glomerular layer and arrows indicate the granule cell layer. Sexual stimulation
by female mice induced expression of IEGs in the wild type OB (B1, B2). IEG induction
was almost absent in the Cnga2 mutants which did not show sexual behaviors (B1’, B2’). IEG induction occurred in
the OB, mainly in the granule cell layer, of the Cnga2-null male mice which showed sniffing and mounting behaviors (B1”, B2”). Insets in
(B1-B2”) show magnified views of the boxed areas. IEG induction occurred in the AOB
of male mice exposed to female mice (arrows, B3-B4”). (B5-B6”) Induction of IEGs in
the PC (arrows) after exposure to female mice. Both in the wild type mice (B5, B6)
and the mutants (B5”, B6”) which showed sexual behaviors, expression of IEGs was induced
in the PC. IEG induction did not occur in the PC of Cnga2-null mice (B5’, B6’) which did not show sexual behaviors. (B7-B8”) Induction of IEGs
in the MePD (arrows) after exposure to female mice. Both in the wild type mice (B7,
B8) and the mutants (B7”, B8”) which showed sexual behaviors, expression of IEGs was
induced in the MePD. The IEG induction did not occur in the MePD of Cnga2-null mice (B7’, B8’) which did not show sexual behaviors. Scale bars: (A1-A2’ and
B3-B4”) 100 μm, (B1-B2”) 500 μm, (B5-B8’) 200 μm.

To check whether the main olfactory system in Cnga2-null male mice is unable to detect conspecific cues from female mice, we exposed
Cnga2-null male mice and wild type male littermates to estrous female mice. Wild type mice
started chemoinvestigation (sniffing/licking) of the female anogenital regions almost
instantly (Additional file
2: Movie S1) and did mounting (attempted or successful) within the first 3 min of exposure.
Consistent with a previous report
[20], the lack of sexual behaviors was clearly apparent in Cnga2-null male mice (Additional file
2: Movie S1). Most of the Cnga2-mutant mice (7 out of 9 mice) did not initiate the exploration of female anogenital
or facial regions. Instead, mutant male mice exhibited only occasional sniff-like
behaviors often resembling grooming behaviors. We did not observe any mounting behavior
in the Cnga2- null male mice during presentation of female mice for 30 min (data not shown). Nonetheless,
sniffing/sniff-like behavior was observed within the first 3 min of exposure both
in wild type mice and Cnga2-null mice (Additional file
2: Movie S1). Neuronal activation in the OB was strikingly lower in those mutant mice
(Figure
5B1’, B2’) compared to wild type male littermates (Figure
5B1, B2). Interestingly, a few (2 out of 9) Cnga2-null male mice showed positive sexual behaviors which were practically indistinguishable
from the wild type behaviors. Those mutants started chemoinvestigation (sniffing/licking)
of the female anogenital areas almost instantly and showed mounting behaviors even
within the first minute of exposure (Additional file
3: Movie S2). Despite the arousal of sexual behaviors the strong glomerular activation
observed in the OB of wild type mice (arrowheads, Figure
5B1) was absent in those mutants. Nevertheless, c-fos and other IEGs were induced in a small fraction of OB granule cells in the mutant
mice (arrows, Figure
5B1”, B2”); albeit the induction was noticeably lower than that in wild type mice (arrows,
Figure
5B1, B2).

Conspecific odor cues considerably induced expression of IEGs in the mouse AOB (arrows,
Figure
5B3, B4, compare Figure
5A2). Even in the Cnga2-null male mice, a substantial IEG induction was observed in the AOB after exposure
to the female stimuli (arrows, Figure
5B3”, B4”). Consistently, IEG induction was lower in the mutants which did not show
any apparent sexual behavior (arrows, Figure
5B3-B4”).

We further analyzed neuronal activation in other brain regions of the Cnga2-null male mice which were exposed to female mice (Figure
5B5-B8”). We found that induction of c-fos expression was very low in the PC of the Cnga2-null mice which did not show sexual behaviors (arrows, Figure
5B5’, B6”). In rodents, exposure to estrous odors increased Fos immunoreactivity in
the medial amygdala
[39] and the medial amygdala was found to regulate attraction to female odor cues
[40]. We found that both in wild type mice and Cnga2 mutants which interacted with female mice, a conspicuous induction of IEGs occurred
in the posterodorsal part of the medial amygdaloid nucleus (MePD) (arrows, Figure
5B7, B8, B7”, B8”). Expectedly, the IEG induction in the MePD was much lower in the
Cnga2-null male mice which did not show sexual behaviors (arrows, Figure
5B7’, B8’). These results provide the evidence that tracing IEG induction by ISH can
detect differences in brain activities, with high spatial sensitivity, which correspond
to individual behavioral differences. These results also indicate that the lack of
amygdaloid activation following presentation of the female sexual stimuli may contribute
to the diminished sexual behaviors observed in the majority of Cnga2-null male mice.

We then sought to know if a strong odorant, amyl acetate, can trigger glomerular activation
in the Cnga2-null OB in our experimental conditions. To our surprise, we observed robust activation
of a large number of glomeruli by the emergence of dense c-fos mRNA signals in periglomerular cells and in the mitral/tufted cell layer and the
granule cell layer below the activated glomeruli (Figure
6A). Interestingly, c-fos induction was stronger in the mutant OB, predominantly in the ventrolateral aspects,
compared to that in the wild type OB (Figure
6A).

We next exposed the Cnga2-null mice and wild type littermates to the predator odor TMT which produces avoidance
behaviors in rodents
[41]. For behavioral analyses we introduced a piece of filter paper soaked with distilled
water or TMT in the mouse cage and observed avoidance behaviors such as stretch attend
posture (the animal approaches and sniffs the filter paper with flat back and stretch
neck) and withdrawal (the mouse approaches without contact and immediately withdraws
from the stimulus) and non-avoidance behaviors such as crouching over object and catching
(the mouse takes the filter paper in its mouth)
[42]. TMT-induced avoidance behaviors, as quantified by the events of withdrawal, were
present in wild type mice but practically absent in Cnga2-null mice (Figure
6B1, Additional file
4: Movie S3). In contrast, Cnga2-null mice showed non-avoidance behaviors including increased investigation and crouching
over the TMT-soaked filter paper unlike their wild type littermates (Figure
6B1, Additional file
4: Movie S3). We then checked IEG expression levels in the mice which were exposed
to TMT for 30 min. TMT strongly induced c-fos mRNA expression in the wild type OB (Figure
6B2). Notably, we also observed strong induction of IEGs in the OB and the AOB of Cnga2-null mice (Figure
6B2’, B3’, respectively) despite the absence of predator odor-induced avoidance response
(Figure
6B1). Taken together, our results suggest that the predator odor TMT can strongly activate
the main olfactory system in Cnga2-null mice although such activation seemed to fail to produce typical avoidance response.

Discussion

Detection of neuronal activity using ISH of IEGs

Tracing IEG expression has been proved to be a very reliable and powerful tool for
visualization of neuronal activities. In this study we compared mRNA expression patterns
of ten IEGs using the ISH method. We found that these IEGs, which included both the
transcription factors and effectors, were expressed at low levels in different brain
regions in mice at the basal condition (Figure
1). We observed differential expression patterns of these activity-dependent genes
in different cell layers of the mouse OB. Interestingly, all these genes were induced
significantly in the OB after exposure of the mouse to a given odorant, presumably
due to stimulation of the olfactory sensory pathway. However, an increasing number
of studies indicate that centrifugal innervation can substantially modulate odor processing
in the OB
[11-14]. We observed IEG induction in spatially restricted regions in response to propionic
acid whereas amyl acetate triggered global induction in the OB (Figures
1,
2 and
3). Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that central inputs had role in activation
of a large number of OB granule cells we observed in some cases, for instance, after
amyl acetate exposure.

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)-PAS transcription factor Npas4 has been previously
identified as a critical factor in regulation of inhibitory synapse development on
excitatory neurons
[43] and recent reports indicate that the Npas4 gene is involved in learning and memory
[44,45]. Expression of Npas4 mRNA was found to be increased by membrane depolarization in vitro and by 1 h light
stimulation in vivo in the visual cortex of dark-reared mice
[43]. Our in vivo results indicate that the basal expression of Npas4 is very low in the mouse OB and a brief olfactory stimulation is sufficient to induce
this gene rapidly and transiently in the mouse brain (Figure
1I1-I2’, Figure
2).

We found that the induction of both c-fos and Egr1 took place in a greater number of cells in the OB compared to that of other IEGs,
although the basal expression of Egr1 was slightly higher (Figure
1A1-A2’, D1-D2’). The rapid induction and the wider coverage of c-fos expression in different subtypes of cells explain the versatile use of c-fos in IEG mapping. Nevertheless, a different IEG may be suitable in a particular experimental
setup depending on the neuronal cell type or the stimuli under consideration. For
instance, in a recent study Isogai et al. (2011) compared the expression of several IEGs in mouse vomeronasal organ and found
that the Egr1, but not the c-fos, was induced robustly following sensory stimulation
[46]. Likewise, our results suggest that Npas4 would be a suitable marker for identifying activation of granule cells in the mouse
OB.

Sexual behaviors in Cnga2-null male mice

Previous studies indicated that inactivation of the main olfactory system considerably
affects sexual behaviors in male mice
[34]. This view has been substantiated by the observation of significant deficits in sexual
behavior in male Cnga2-null mice
[20] since CNGA2 is essential for signal transduction in most of the MOE neurons
[15,47,48]. Consistently, we observed that in Cnga2-null male mice female sexual stimuli failed to activate the OB and did not initiate
sexual behaviors although the IEGs were significantly induced in the AOB. However,
there are individual differences and in a longer mating assay Mandiyan et al. (2005) found that a female mouse cohabitating with mutants was plugged once and gave
birth
[20]. We also observed significant sexual arousal in a few Cnga2-mutant male mice (see results). This raised the possibility that a CNGA2-independent
signaling pathway(s) can activate the OB to initiate sexual behaviors. Our study supports
this idea, although it contradicts with the suggestion made by Mandiyan et al. (2005) that the sub-population of MOE neurons which use alternative signaling pathway
cannot initiate mating responses
[20]. We observed induction of IEGs in a significant number of OB granule cells and mitral/tufted
cells in the Cnga2-null mice which initiated mating behaviors when exposed to estrous female mice (Figure
5B1”, B2”). Previously it has been suggested that the transient receptor potential
channel M5 (TRPM5)-expressing OSNs which project to the ventral OB are involved in
pheromone signaling in CNGA2-defective mice
[49]. In the Cnga2 mutants we observed stronger induction of IEGs in the dorsal OB (arrows, Figure
5B1”, B2”) in addition to the weaker ventral induction. Therefore, another set of OSNs
targeting glomeruli in the dorsal OB may participate in transmitting olfactory signals
sufficient to initiate mating behaviors in CNGA2-deficient mice. However, we cannot
rule out the possibility that the sexual arousal observed in a few Cnga2-null male mice might have been initially triggered by sensory modalities other than
olfaction, for instance, visual and/or auditory stimuli, which activated centrifugal
inputs to the OB and induced IEGs predominantly in the granule cell layer (Figure
5B1”,B2”) secondary to the activation of the accessory olfactory system (Figure
5B3”,B4”).

Strong glomerular activation in the OB of anosmic Cnga2-null mice

Using ISH we compared the expression level of IEGs in the olfactory system of Cnga2-null mice and wild type control mice. We found that the environmental olfactory stimuli
in usual laboratory conditions produce significant neuronal activities in the OB of
wild type mice whereas the IEG expression levels were remarkably lower in the OB of
Cnga2-null mice (Figure
5A).

Previously Lin et al. (2004) found that CNGA2-deficient mice detected some odorants and the authors suggested
cAMP-independent pathways for the observed responses
[21]. Later, Munger and colleagues (2007) demonstrated that GC-D neurons, which lack CNGA2
and several other components of the canonical odor transduction pathway and axons
of which innervate the necklace glomeruli, can utilize a cGMP-dependent signaling
cascade for chemosensory transduction
[38]. In those previous studies only a small subset of glomeruli including the necklace
glomeruli were found to be activated by the suggested CNGA2-independent signaling
pathway(s)
[21,38]. In contrast, we observed that amyl acetate robustly induced c-fos mRNA expression in the OB of Cnga2-null mice, notably at the ventrolateral OB, in a large number of glomeruli which
could include, but apparently not limited to, the necklace glomeruli (Figure
6A1’). We also observed that TMT, a predator odor from fox which produces fear responses
in wild type mice, induced the expression of IEGs very strongly in the OB (Figure
6B2’) without eliciting any obvious fear response in Cnga2-null mice. Previously Kobayakawa et al. (2007) found that the mice in which the OSNs were ablated specifically in the dorsal
olfactory epithelium lacked innate fear response to TMT even though the mice could
detect the odorant
[30]. They proposed the existence of hard-wired circuits in the mammalian olfactory system
for processing innate responses
[30,50]. Our results indicate that a CNGA2-dependent signaling pathway may be essential for
the mouse olfactory circuits to initiate innate fear responses.

In our experiments odorant concentrations were high since pure liquid odorants were
introduced in the mouse cage. Previously it has been suggested that a cAMP-independent
pathway(s) contributed in the EOG responses observed in the MOE of Cnga2-null mice exposed to odorants at relatively higher concentrations
[21]. Olfactory neurons expressing TRPM5 can detect the chemicals involved in animal communication
and TRPM5-expressing OSNs project mainly to the ventral OB
[49]. Indeed, we observed strong c-fos induction in a large number of glomeruli mainly in the ventral OB in Cnga2-null mice exposed to amyl acetate (Figure
6A1’). In addition, a predator odor TMT strongly activated spatially segregated glomeruli
in mutants (Figure
6B2’). However, in addition to direct peripheral inputs via OSNs, there could be other
possibilities which might contribute to the odor-induced glomerular activation observed
in Cnga2-null mice. Centrifugal inputs are known to modulate neuronal activities in the rodent
OB, predominantly in the granule cell layer
[11-14] and might have contributed in the odorant-induced IEG inductions observed in the
present study. Although Cnga2-null mice appeared normal in several behavioral tests including grooming
[20,51], the size of the OB is apparently smaller in the mutants and alteration in brain
development has been suggested
[37]. Schaefer et al. (2002) reported collateral innervation of the olfactory epithelium and OB by some
trigeminal ganglion cells in rats
[52,53]. Trigeminal activation was found to inhibit olfactory responses
[52,54] and thus, the role of trigeminal activation might be insignificant for IEG induction
in our experiments. It was interesting that amyl acetate-induced c-fos expression was stronger in CNGA2-deficient mice compared to wild type mice and may
suggest impaired peripheral adaptation in glomeruli
[55] and/or reduced presynaptic inhibition of OSNs
[56] in mutants although further studies will be needed to decode the observed phenomena.
However, without the CNGA2 subunit there is no functional CNG channel for transduction
of olfactory signals in most of the MOE neurons
[47,48]. Together, our data provide support for the idea that in addition to the CNGA2-dependent
pathway other alternative signaling pathways participate in signal transduction in
the mouse main olfactory system.

Conclusions

In this study we performed ISH analysis to confirm odor-evoked induction of a number
of IEGs and show for the first time that in vivo olfactory stimulation can strongly
induce the neuronal IEG Npas4 in the mouse OB. We provide evidence that some odorants can produce strong glomerular
activation in the Cnga2-null mice in which the olfactory cAMP signaling pathway is almost completely perturbed
suggesting involvement of CNGA2-independent signaling pathway(s) for processing olfactory
information. Furthermore, our findings advocate that the ISH probe set we established
for IEG tracing can be very useful to visualize neuronal activity with high spatial
resolution.

Methods

Mice

Pregnant ICR mice were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc. Cnga2 mutant mice (JAX Mice stock number 002905) originated from Dr. John Ngai lab
[19] were kindly provided by Dr. Hitoshi Sakano
[57]. Since the Cnga2 gene localizes on X chromosome, Cnga2-null male mice were obtained by crossing wild type male mice and heterozygous female
mice. Although most of the Cnga2-null mice die during early postnatal period, a few rare survivors can grow until
adulthood. At least three wild type mice and two Cnga2-null mice were analyzed for each condition. For Cnga2-null mice, wild type male littermates were used as controls. All measures were taken
to minimize pain or discomfort to the mice. All animal procedures were carried out
following the guidelines of Kumamoto University and Niigata University.

Odorant exposure

Mice were exposed to overhead airflow for 2 h in a clean cage without food and water
before the odorant exposure. Undiluted odorants were poured into a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge
tube attached to the wall of the mouse cage. Following odorants were used: Amyl acetate/Pentyl
acetate (60 μl, Wako, Japan), Propionic acid (60 μl, Sigma-Aldrich) and 2, 3, 5-trimethyl-3-thiazoline
(TMT) (30 μl, Contech, Canada). If not mentioned otherwise, mice were exposed to the
test odorant continuously for 30 min and sacrificed immediately. For analyzing IEG
induction a mouse was tested only once to minimize effects of learning.

Mating assay

Mice were habituated in the test cage for 2 h as described above. A wild type estrous
female mouse was presented for 30 min to an individual test mouse with no prior sexual
experience. Sexual behaviors (sniffing, mounting and intromission) of the male mouse
were observed and the test mouse was sacrificed at the end of the 30-min exposure.
Sexual behaviors were considered to be present if the test mouse did mounting (attempted/successful)
at least once during the 30-min period.

TMT-induced avoidance test

Mice were habituated for approximately 10 min in the test cage (30.5 × 20 × 13 cm,
without food, water, and lid) followed by the 3-min test period. Then a piece of filter
paper (~2 cm × 2 cm) soaked with distilled water (control) or TMT was introduced at
one end of the cage. Avoidance and non-avoidance behaviors were observed
[42]. Avoidance was counted as the number of events of withdrawal (the mouse approaches
the odorant without contacting it, immediately withdrawing from it) and non-avoidance
behavior was counted as the number of events of crouching over (the mouse investigates
and crouches over the filter paper)
[42]. Three Cnga2-null male and 3 wild type littermate male mice were used for this test. The test
was done twice with intervals of at least 3 days.

Quantification of IEG expression levels

Images of stained coronal sections of the olfactory bulb were captured with an Olympus
microscope and digital camera system (BX53 and DP72; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Quantification
was performed using Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended (version 12.0.4 × 64, Adobe Systems
Incorporated) adapting the techniques described previously
[59,60]. The glomerular layer, the mitral cell layer and the granule cell layer were selected
separately by the Lasso tool. Total number of pixels and the number of pixels positive
for ISH signals were counted using the Histogram tool. Signal intensity (arbitrary
unit) of IEGs was calculated as the percentage of area positive for ISH signals in
respective layers of the olfactory bulb. Data were plotted in column charts where
columns represented mean ± SEM. Seven to eight bulbs (approximately from + 4.5 mm
bregma to + 4 mm bregma) from two to three mice were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Student's t-test was performed to compare means. Difference between groups was considered highly
significant (**) when p≤ 0.01 and significant (*) when p≤ 0.05.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AKB carried out the experiments, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript.
KW participated in the design of the study, and helped to analyze the data and to
draft the manuscript. MY participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript
critically. NT participated in the design of the study and revised the manuscript.
HT conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped
to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. John Ngai, Dr. Nobuko Inoue and Dr. Hitoshi Sakano for Cnga2-null mice, Dr. Daniel Lévesque and Dr. Joseph Beavo for Nor1 and Pde2 plasmids, respectively and Ms. Mari Miyamoto for technical assistance. The authors
are thankful to the animal facilities at Kumamoto University and Niigata University
for maintaining the mouse colonies. This work was supported by Grants from JST PRESTO
and Global COE Program (Cell Fate Regulation Research and Education Unit), MEXT, Japan.
AKB is supported by the Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho: MEXT) Scholarship.