If we can go off topic for a second, I fail to understand why my system works out more WUs than Tulatin for example and yet I got far less points. There must be something wrong. Or Should I ask, what did you do Tulatin? Can you post your settings, dude?

Tulatin, you sure fold good for your system. I mean your running at 2.5 right now? I take it p4's fold better? Yeah, I guess I am folding alright. But considering my computer is new, and tulatin's is a year old, and he is folding at the same rate. That makes me sort of disappointed, but happy for Tulatin of course .

Southwind25 wrote:I finally got my Barton sorted out. I'm doing a tinker on it too. It's running at 2200 mhz and doing a frame every 4 miuntes and 35 seconds, so I'd say your's was performing about where it should be Danny. Len, I'm running the graphical version and I can't seem to find the point values for WU's. What should a 400 frame tinker be worth?

it will be stated for sure in the fahlog.txt file. there is also a file for the currently running wu, and will show % completion. my computer-> hdd partition where OS is-> programs-> FAH and check out the files there (i'm sure you know this )!

miki02131 wrote:If we can go off topic for a second, I fail to understand why my system works out more WUs than Tulatin for example and yet I got far less points. There must be something wrong. Or Should I ask, what did you do Tulatin? Can you post your settings, dude?

first we need to determine if you are completing wu's 100%, or sending in partially completed ones for partial credit.