Statement from the Candidate

In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.

Friday, March 25, 2016

Chelsea Clinton recently voiced the official Hillary
admission that Obamacare is a disaster and that its costs are “crushing” many
Americans financially. It seems to me that Hillary is a little late in this
realization.

Where was Hillary when we had a chance to halt the
Obamacare insanity before it was enacted? Did she not read the bill (oops, no
one was allowed to read the original 20,000 page bill before it was enacted by
Democrats only, along strict party lines). Did she not hear conservatives say
that exactly what is happening with the ACA would inevitably happen (oops
again. Republicans and conservatives who mentioned the destructive aspects of
Obamacare were branded as obstructionists and racists who hated poor people)?

Of course Hillary will not propose repealing Obamacare
and restoring the nation’s healthcare to a policy of allowing competition and
individual choice among free citizens. She will not allow competitive, cross-state-line
insurance offerings in the 50 states. Nor will she allow the consideration of
tort reform to reduce costs and liability. And she doesn’t like the idea of
medical savings accounts that allow Americans to be responsible for their own
lives. Her only acknowledged idea for helping the middle class afford health
care is to tweak the bill here and there while retaining complete government
control. Obama’s “legacy” needs to be completely gutted and repealed in order
to “fix” it.

Although Hillary pretends to oppose Obamacare, two
articles from The Hill have headlines
that strongly suggest otherwise. On September 15, 2014, they wrote: “Hillary
Clinton’s fingerprints are all over Obamacare”, and on January 27, 2016,
Hillary is quoted as saying: “It was Hillarycare before it was Obamacare”. So
it’s obvious that Hillary wants to have the discussion both ways: she takes
credit for giving Obama the idea for Obamacare and wants uninformed people to
thank her for this plague on America, and at the same time wants to appear to
be a great reformer who will undo the excessively expensive Obamacare and save
American families money. One can only hope that Americans voters are smart
enough to not fall for Democrat lies again and will vote for a Republican
president who has promised to repeal Obamacare, period!

One wonders what other horrible, destructive things
that Obama has cooked up the last seven years that liberals pretend to like
while their ruler is in power, but that they will disdain in the future as the
destructiveness of the Obama administration becomes apparent. Will they realize
the absolute terror of the Iran nuke deal? Obama’s blaming of Israel for the Palestinian
problem? The opening of our borders to allow all who want to enter illegally be
welcomed to do so? The relocation of Syrian “refugees” into our country? Forced
location of welfare housing projects into middle class neighborhoods? Trying to
“contain” ISIS instead of totally destroying it? Dancing on television while Brussels
burned? And how about Obama’s plan to “fundamentally transform America”? Was that
really a good idea?

Democrats, regardless of age, seem to be stuck in the
stage of brain maturity where the prefrontal cortex is not fully developed,
which process usually completes by age 25, thereby making their decisions brash
and irrational and not fully thought through and properly considered. This
immaturity among Democrats/liberals/progressives is dangerous.

But they are what they are: Democrats behave like
impulsive teenagers who will not listen to conservatives as they make unwise
decisions that negatively impact every American, while calling conservatives
who give wise counsel obstructionists, old-fashioned, racists and bigots who
just want to keep liberals from having fun. Parents with teenagers will recognize
these responses coming from Democrat/liberal/progressives for what they are:
immature and thoughtless.

It makes one sad to consider the blessings this nation
could have had, and the tens of billions of dollars we might have saved, if
Obamacare had been rejected and real, meaningful healthcare revisions and
improvements could have been introduced instead of the government taking over
the constitutional rights of Americans in the running of their lives. It’s been
a tragedy, and it’s on the heads of the thoughtless, immature Democrats.

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

As recently as June 28, 2015, National Public Radio
broadcast a program having this title: “Home Grown Threat: FBI Tracks White
Separatists, Domestic Extremists”.

I found this interesting because every time Donald
Trump or Ted Cruz make a statement of trying to uncover the next bombing and mass
murder by Muslim extremists, and we know one is coming, by having the police
quietly track them and listen in on their planning, liberals fly into a rage at
the nerve of anyone suggesting that our law enforcement agencies actually
invade the privacy of Islamic groups. It amazes me how liberals can be so
short-sighted and pretend that their own family members may not be the target
of the next bombing of an airport or a shopping center by radical groups, and
it amazes me that they are content with letting such violent planning proceed
with no attempt to halt it by allowing the police to intervene beforehand.

Well, if white groups can be tracked and invaded, why
not Muslim groups? After all, a white group may want to separate from the
country and may demonstrate hate for all or a part of the rest of the nation,
but they don’t claim to want the destruction of the country as a whole, which
radical Islamists chant all the time is their goal. Plus they want death to
Israel, and want the destruction of the very liberal nations of Europe to boot.
They just hate everyone who is not a Muslim and want them dead. And is anyone
pretending that the Ku Klux Klan wasn’t surveilled by the FBI?

White supremacists and Islamic groups are both full of
hate, so why should one be protected from surveillance and not the other?
Closely watching any type of violent group would protect many innocent lives. A
report dated September 2012, detailed how law enforcement derailed radical
eco-terrorist groups. I would never say that if we let one radical group
practice their violence and hate that we need to let them all do so, but that
seems to be the essence of what liberals believe, except that Muslim groups
want total death to all non-believers, and other radical groups don’t. We may
well be fighting for the survival of all of North America if Islamist groups
get their hands on a nuclear weapon, so I see nothing wrong with trying to stop
these radical religious groups just as we have other, more “traditional”
groups. Our lives may depend on it.

Obama needs to be praised for at least his imagined “containment”
of ISIS because his wasted words tell us that the thought had at least entered
his vacant head, but unfortunately the real world has caught up with our dallying
president, and while he basks in a hero’s glory in Communist Cuba and soaks up
the sun with the Castro dictators, ISIS has once again proven our president to
be a fool and a liar: he hasn’t contained anything but the American economy and
our constitutional rights, and ISIS is on the loose pulling a blitzkrieg in
Brussels.

Political correctness is destroying Europe, and
America is close behind. Nations like
Belgium have welcomed the suffering refugees from the Middle East with open
arms, and they are in turn rewarded with high welfare roles, no-go areas of
their cities where police refuse to enter, and are experiencing numerous bombings,
killing many of the good citizens of that nation.

Hillary would be no better than Obama has been at reducing
the threat to America from these terrorists because she is so full of the
leftist kumbaya crap, and her Sec State experience is so weak on dealing
properly with the forces that threaten us, that if president, she would only
insist on accepting more refugees into America and want to dole out more
economic aid to the nations harboring these criminals.

What we need is a Trump or a Cruz in the Oval Office,
both of whom are willing to get real and launch a modern-day Cruz-ade (pun
intended) on our sworn enemies while giving conservatives a rest for a while
from the constant and unrelenting abuse they’ve taken from the leftist press
and the two Democrat candidates, for remarks about keeping suspect people out
of America while the threat to our lives and liberties are being investigated
and resolved. If France and Belgium had ignored political correctness, kept
trouble-makers out of their countries and not allowed entire neighborhoods
become terrorist training and breeding camps, Paris and Brussels would have
possibly avoided the horrible attacks they’ve experienced recently.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Obama makes a nuke deal with Iran with no pre-conditions,
assures Americans and the world that nuclear weapon development will not be
allowed to continue, and then gives Iran everything they demand as part of the
deal. Obama gets nothing in return for his efforts and now we find out that
Iran is indeed continuing to develop a nuclear weapon, as well as otherwise breaking
all of the articles to the agreement, which Iran still refuses to sign by the
way, and which our fool president insists is a good deal for the world and
enhances his legacy. And all of this is after Obama ignored the Iranian green
revolution in 2009, thereby dooming all of the young people who risked their
lives in an attempt to overthrow the dictatorship of the Mullahs in Iran.

Now Obama is rewarding the criminal Cuban dictatorship
for their years of terror on the Cuban population by sealing a deal in which he
restored diplomatic relations with them. This weekend Obama traveled to Cuba in
hopes of being received like the hero he thinks he is. But, Surprise! Our idle-minded
president was insulted and snubbed by the Castro brothers and left alone and
lonely at the airport. But, true to his attitude toward dictatorship regimes,
he just kept on playing the game, grinning his Alfred E. Neuman grin and
pretended he didn’t catch the insult he got from the Castros.

What does Obama not understand about national pride
and personal legacies? Why can’t this man understand that history will laugh at
him in the future just as Iranian and Cuban rulers are laughing at him today,
and as we all laugh at Neville Chamberlain for his idiotic, legacy-building,
Peace In Our Time deal with Hitler? Recall when Obama whispered to Russian
President Medvedev that he would be able to deal more freely with Vladimir
Putin if Vlad would only give him time to win a second term as American
president, at which time he would be free to give the Russians everything they
want? When you consider the whipping Putin later gave Obama in Syria, it’s
plain to see that, once again, Obama played the fool to Russia and got his head
handed to him. International dictators are a little more difficult for an
American president to deal with than are local community ward-leader Democrats
and PC-terrified corporate CEOs, and Obama is now way out of his depth. He is
no longer the sharp Chicago Community Organizer and rabble rouser he once was.
He’s now a failed president leading a once great nation on a downward path to
oblivion.

Obama obviously loves and admires absolute power and dictatorships
with whom he can make deals. It’s equally obvious that he hates American
constitutional government which places obstacles in his way when he wants to
act like a Putin or a Castro. Obama’s presidency shows us that he’s made every
effort to become a dictator here at home. But one wonders if Obama is as stupid
as he seems to be and if there is not some personal reward coming his way after
he leaves office for allowing our foreign adversaries to walk all over him while
serving as president. After all, if Obama is held in low regard, all Americans
are held in low regard as a result, and this pleases our enemies greatly. Elections
have consequences and our national embarrassment is one of the negative results
of Obama being president.

Saturday, March 19, 2016

When Obama decided that we need to start bailing out
Castro’s failed paradise in Cuba the situation became a classic case of “blame
America first”. He told us that the
terrible fault with Cuba was not the Communism/Fascism practiced by the Castro
brothers, but rather America’s meddling in Cuba’s business, and as a result America
is destroying the futures of every Cuban citizen and we need to cease and
desist immediately, restore diplomatic relations and start pumping some dollars
Castro’s way.

Even though we have numerous Cuban refugees in America
who say that making Fidel wealthy will not only not improve the condition of
the Cuban citizens who have suffered greatly these last 60 years, but would
only reward Castro for bad behavior and further separate him from the real,
desperate lives of Cuba’s citizens. Obama didn’t address Castro’s jails, which
are packed with people who spoke up or acted against Cuba’s totalitarian
regime. Nor did he tell us how the lives
of those who object to complete control by big government would be improved by the
restoration of relations between our two nations.

So now we have it on record that Obama believes that
if one tries for several years to punish the Cuban leaders by enforcing an
embargo against them, and if the dictatorship remains in power years later, Obama’s
advice is to attempt change in a different way: remove the embargo and restore
trade and travel between the two countries. Applying this principle to America,
the Obama regime has experienced nothing but failure in all measurable ways resulting
from his “fundamental transformation of America” via radical executive orders, overbearing
regulations and his personal non-compliance with laws he doesn’t like. When I
say he’s “seen nothing but failure in all measurable ways resulting from his
“fundamental transformation of America”’ I mean things like his failed economy,
a failed immigration policy, failed national security considerations, an
increased unemployment index, more people on welfare, and more killings on the
streets of Chicago and Baltimore, among other things. But Obama measures his
success not in how well or badly Americans live and see their lives, but rather
he gauges success on how much of an American’s life is controlled by the
government, so he will allow no departure from his increasing control over the
lives of American citizens and will not lighten the burden of big government on
our lives and liberties. So much for his idea of rectifying a failed policy by
trying something else.

For seven years Obama has steadily increased the
influence of big government in everyone’s life from Obamacare to Obamaphone; to
opening our southern borders to all illegal aliens; to encouraging people to go
on welfare; to making minorities feel abused, resentful and downtrodden; to
investigating police departments to make them appear to be acting criminally;
to never defining an Islamic attack as being terrorism (rather calling the acts
work place violence). And even for those
who would consider each of these things something they would hold against Obama
as being bad for the nation and bad for every individual citizen, each one has
been good for Obama because they have given him and his liberal/progressive
party enormous power over three hundred million American lives, and that’s what
a “fundamental transformation of America” is: taking freedom and prosperity
from the citizens and transferring it to Obama’s supporters and establishment
politicians in both parties.

The good news in the most recent primary elections is
that the strong Republicans on the one hand, and the anti-Clinton/Obama theme
of Bernie Sanders on the other, soundly thrashed their opponents (in the cases
of Trump and Cruz in the Republican race) or have mightily frightened the opposing
contender (in the case of Bernie Sanders on the Democrat side). It now appears
that conservative ideas and ideals will be represented in the Republican Party
in 2016 (to the chagrin of the old establishment Republicans) and that
leftist/socialist ideas will carry the day for the Democrats.

So one can truly say that each party is unifying its
base, but the party unification now creates two very different cliffs with a
wide canyon between them at the national level. There will still be moderates
on both sides that will interact with the dedicated conservatives and liberals
in the respective parties, but the general drift of the two parties is to put
more ground between them and have less cooperation and overlap in their
policies.

Back in the 1950s and 1960s it was said that America
was a peaceful, happy democracy because most people did not vote at all since
the two parties shared so many ideas and principles of how government should be
run that citizens felt they didn’t need to vote in order to remain free and
prosperous. But this idea is no longer true and many people now fear losing the
liberties and wealth they had ten years ago.

Bernie’s Democrats want more government handouts and goodies
regardless of what the constitution says and regardless of what the cost is,
and conservatives want much less government involvement and control in their
lives. The divide could not be more clear, nor more threatening to our nation.

I don’t think that the self-righteous left, the people
blocking Donald Trump from making a speech a week-ago Friday, and the two
groups demonstrating against Trump and causing trouble today in New York City
and in Phoenix, are smart enough to understand that they are generating support
for Trump from many who were undecided, and locking in support for him by those
who were already attracted to his no-nonsense, anti-political correctness attitude.
As usual, these leftists are attempting to be important by pretending to be above-it-all
and superior with their marching and chanting and their waving of signs.

In New York I understand that the marchers got violent
with the police and several were arrested, and in Phoenix there may have been
peoples’ health and welfare threatened if those individuals trapped on the
blockaded highway were trying to get to a hospital or were driving to pick up a
child. I equate this uncalled-for involvement in
other peoples’ lives to be a form of violence, and the threat is coming only from
the left, not from Donald Trump, who is the person being protested against and
whose speech and movements are being restricted by the micro-terrorists.

I really resent these mainly young, inexperienced
people pretending to tell me not only whom to vote for, but trying to make my
side of the political divide look like the side of hate, intimidation and
intolerance. The persons on the left are always intolerant.

These young people have no idea how negatively Hillary,
Bernie and Obama’s open immigration ideas will impact their lives and their
economic futures if the left wins the next election. They are blind to the
negative impact on their lives via Obama’s EPA and his disastrous Affordable
Care Act, and the limitations placed on job creation that his policies have
caused.

Given that the campaigning has a long way to go before
the November election, I expect the intolerant left to become more unhinged and
violent due to their literal, although unjustified, fear of Trump and Cruz, in
the months ahead.

Damn these fools for their self-centered misplaced
superiority and for limiting my liberties and freedom in their abuse of the
candidate I choose to listen to and will vote for if he becomes the Republican candidate.
The more the punks demonstrate, the more set against them I become, and I’m not
alone in this attitude.

Friday, March 18, 2016

There are time when one looks at wonder at the bizarre
world we are in. Obama trashes the constitution; he disobeys laws (he even
disobeys his own laws); he lies about healthcare; he lets the EPA rape personal
real estate holdings and corporate manufacturing sites; he runs up an unpayable
national debt; he allows international criminals to kill-at-will in Syria and
Iraq; he oversees the highest unemployment rate in years; he pulls our troops
out of Iraq and allows that relatively settled country to revert back to chaos;
he opens the borders to all who would like to come illegally to America and
partake of the goodies he hands out to them; he is willing to accept Syrian
“refugees” even if they are infiltrated with ISIS killers; he forces nuns to
provide abortions to church employees; he allows Iran to continue to develop a
nuclear device; he develops plans to force middle class neighborhoods to accept
buildings of welfare recipients to be constructed in their midst; he oversees more
murders in Chicago and Baltimore than one can believe; he repeatedly tries to
devise ways to take guns from American citizens; the nation’s welfare roles
have greatly increased under Obama’s administration; our national credit rating
has been down-graded under Obama; the police forces in America are under
violent attack because of Obama’s Justice Department; he swears to “fundamentally
transform America” and seems to be doing a great job of it; he provides money
and personnel to overthrow Netanyahu in Israeli elections; he goes out of his
way to make enemies of nearly every ally we have in the world, while
simultaneously getting up-close and personal with Vladimir Putin, the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt and the Castro brothers; and someone is worried about what
Donald Trump would do to America and the World Order? Anything would be an
improvement over the fool now occupying the Oval Office.

If our political ruling class has any trust in
Americans to make decisions that best-serve their own and America’s fortunes,
they’d better let the current primary process reach its natural conclusion and
stop telling us how stupid we are out here amongst the unwashed masses, because
it’s the smart set in Washington and New York who have dropped the ball and
allowed liberalism/progressivism to control our lives and threaten our nation’s
demise.

If Donald Trump is such a problem and will be so
easily defeated by Hillary Clinton in a general election, then why are the
leftists giving him so much negative attention and not simply allowing him to
hang himself with his statements and positions? And why, if Trump is such an awful politician,
is Republican turn-out at the primary elections setting new records while the
Democrats are seeing shrinking numbers of voters turning out to vote for them?
The truth is that the Democrats are frightened of Trump and know that Hillary
will lose to him in a general election, while the Republican establishment
fears that he will upset their carefully planned self-serving applecart if
elected, and that he will concentrate on things that matter to real Americans
and their families instead if pushing the politically correct crap that the
Republican establishment has allied themselves with the Democrats to enact.

Judge Merrick Garland was sobbing as he thanked the
America-hating Barack Obama for appointing him to be Antonin Scalia’s
replacement on the Supreme Court. Mr. Garland had reason to shed tears because
Obama is shamelessly using him as a flag of war being waved at Republican
Senators who have already stated that they will not consider anyone appointed
by Barack Obama in the last few months of his administration. The Republicans
stated that their lack of consideration for any appointment Obama sends to them
is in keeping with the Biden Rule, which our idiot Vice President used in past
years to block a Republican president from making a late-term appointment.

It’s typical of Obama to use as a foil anyone and
anything he can possibly throw at a Republican, knowing that the Democrat Party
press will take up the charge and abuse the Republicans for finally taking a
principled stand against Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America”. The
New York Times stated that Obama’s appointment is a dare “to Republican senators
to…block consideration” of Mr. Garland for the open Supreme Court seat, knowing
that the liberal press will side with Obama on anything he suggests and will
savage Republicans for stalling on the latest political manipulations of Obama.
So even the NYT agrees that Obama is just playing politics with a man’s career
and knows that consideration of the new appointee will amount to little or
nothing.

It’s entertaining to watch Obama self-righteously
insist that Republicans rigidly follow the guidelines of the Constitution when
it comes to his appointments to the judiciary, while he actively and repeatedly
defies and trashes the constitution concerning the rights of Americans to own
weapons with which to defend themselves; and when he illegally allows tens of
thousands of illegal aliens to freely cross our borders; and when he
unconstitutionally forces Americans to buy the government-edicted healthcare
coverage that no one likes or wants.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

In a completely innocent remark Donald Trump recently stated
that if he has sufficient primary votes to win the Republican nomination and if
the Republican establishment refuses to recognize him as the candidate to
represent Republicans as their presidential candidate in November that this
dereliction of duty will cause a “riot” from Republicans who voted for him in
the primaries. Of course the next thing the leftist press could think to say
was that Trump was calling on Republicans to riot and cause trouble at Trump’s
bidding. Why should one be surprised when the context of a statement by a leading
Republican would be completely distorted by the leftist punks in the media? It’s
obvious that Angry White Males don’t have time to riot, they have jobs and
families to attend to and have never become an “occupy” movement.

On the other hand, the Drudge Report is the only place
I’ve seen reference to the plans being laid by George Soros and Move-on.Org (a pro-Bernie
Sanders group) for a violent Democracy Spring demonstration across the United
States to generate a “fire that transforms the political climate in America”. Leftists,
in an effort also backed by the AFL-CIO, fully intend to riot beginning in
April because, well, just because. Has anyone heard the liberal press insist
that Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton reject and condemn the Democracy Spring
movement? No, and you never will. It just never comes up in polite
conversation.

So the left plans and announces violent demonstrations
this spring for purely political reasons, and Trump is savaged for simply stating
that his followers will be angry if electoral justice is not done after a
season of peaceful voting.

If one looks closely at the words of the Democracy
Spring bunch, they’ll notice that they use wording similar to Obama’s “fundamental
transformation of America” when they claim they will ignite a “fire that
transforms…America”. But does the press claim that Obama has inspired specific
leftist plans to become violent in this political year? No. It’s those pesky “angry
white males” that are destroying America, by going peacefully to their polling
place and voting for their chosen candidate.

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

The liberal/establishment press attributes the latest
Republican/conservative primary election wins to “angry white males”. I believe
women also voted in those elections, along with blacks and Hispanics, but when
you want to undermine a vote and a large section of the American population,
you go after the “angry white males” because they are a safe target, and we all
know how crazy and out of control these white male people are. Take for example
the white males on the editorial staffs of the Wall Street Journal, The New
York Times and the Washington Post if you want to see some crazy angry white
males.

But is one “crazy” when one sees their lives and all
they’ve worked for being destroyed by socialist/leftists and make a peaceful,
legal attempt to halt the destruction by actually voting? There are no city
blocks of Ferguson or Baltimore being looted and burned by white males. There
is no equivalent to the Occupy Wall Street movement with riots and raping and
city parks being used as public toilets. The press expressed understanding when
these nuts took to the streets, and even made convoluted attempts to justify
the planned violence in Chicago last Friday as leftists halted a Trump speech. But
if a white male votes to re-establish sanity and constitutional principles to
his government and his daily life, he’s declared to be out of control and
“angry”. In this way the liberal press can then ignore the white male voting
block and make pitches for more destructive and intrusive government.

One supposes that white males are singled out in
today’s political environment because they have largely been silent and
accepting of social changes as long as these changes didn’t infringe on him or
his family’s lives. But Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America” and
Hillary’s and Bernie’s out-right socialism have awakened these men, and now
they want their country returned to sanity and are voting for Cruz and Trump to
get it back.

Friday, March 11, 2016

Mitt Romney, the loser in the 2012 election, who lost
to the most radical, offensive, destructive, anti-American candidate America
has ever had (Barack Obama), is now bad-mouthing one of the most winning
presidential candidates the nation has seen (Donald Trump) and Mitt is seemingly
asking for the coach to put him into the game against Trump for the
presidential nomination for the 2016 general election.

I don’t think so.

Mitt has now resorted to poking fun at and ridiculing
the unsophisticated, uninformed rabble who voted for him in 2012, the very
people who now, in an uprising that is shocking the Republican establishment,
oppose his getting back into the race.

Mitt is acting the part of the Republican
establishment by opposing Trump, and very likely opposing Cruz as well, because
these gentlemen represent the correctly outraged American population, male,
female, black and white, who want the old time Republican establishment properly
defeated and silenced in order to elect the candidate who is determined to put
America back on the road to liberty and prosperity once more, and stop the PC
crap that causes us to apologize for our nation’s wealth and power internationally;
causes us to allow college campus demonstrations and big city riots that
destroy property and risk lives at the domestic level, in the embarrassing effort
to “understand their rage”; and opens our borders to any illegal alien who
wants to pass into the country because they have it so bad at home.

We must stop this idiocy and begin to worry about how decent,
law-abiding American citizens are living and try to resolve the issues that are
bothering them and keeping them from reaching their full potential in this
great nation.

Thursday, March 10, 2016

In Nazi Germany the storm troopers would shoot anyone
found giving shelter to a government-proclaimed sub-human Jew or Gypsy.

In ancient Egypt a solar eclipse frightened the
villagers so much that they sacrificed people to please the spirits.

In early America an Indian tribe could send a woman
into the wilderness to die of starvation and exposure for passing in front of
the chief’s tent while she was pregnant.

In 2016’s America the Obama administration is
considering putting anyone who denies climate change/global warming, or who
doesn’t believe the ice bergs are melting and flooding the world’s land masses,
in jail. Once again Obama is undermining and shredding the constitution. This
is an example of the open minded, nonjudgmental left doing what it does best:
crush any resistance to its edicts and its schemes. It’s what they do: they
devise a scheme to make people feel guilty and stop enjoying their lives, they
raise taxes to fund the implementation of the scheme, and then to make everyone
toe-the-line, they place non-believers in jail. This is what the Obama
administration has come to.

And, of course, they claim to have precedence on their
side. They list the old case of the tobacco industry denying that smoking
cigarettes caused health problems, which was proven to be a false position and
for which the tobacco industry was duly punished, as sufficient legal case
evidence that they can now have American citizens sent to prison because they
don’t believe the government position that the oceans are rising. It’s true
that the tobacco industry did withhold information that proved their product
was harmful, but right there is the difference: the corporations withheld information they knew proved them wrong,
and there was actual scientifically provable evidence of the potential harm from
their product. In the current case of warming/change no one is withholding any
information because there is no information to withhold. The government is
making a claim of warming/change for which there is no actual, provable, scientific
evidence to back them up, only computer programming that produces the outcome
they want, but doesn’t track with the real world.

The term “climate change” is intentionally unspecific because
the temperature changes all the time, season to season and day to day.
Satellite data proves that there has been no rise in the temperature of the
earth in a long while. But the left has been scaring us for years with horror
stories of first a new ice age, and then fears of warming and death to our
entire society if we don’t make draconian changes that give central government
much increased power over each citizen’s life. Paul Ehrlich predicted a massive
human die-off in the 1970s as the population of the world grew so rapidly that
our food supply could not keep up and food-wars would result in total chaos and
destruction. But this prediction did not happen. Then in the 1980s Ted Danson
said that by the 1990s the oceans would all be devoid of any life, but that
didn’t happen either.

Then seven years ago Obama took up the mantle of scare
mongering and said at his inauguration that he would save the planet and halt
the rise of the oceans. But oddly enough, he’s not taking credit for stopping
the rise of the oceans, which I would think he would do since there is no salt
water running in the streets of Miami, Long Beach or New York City. The reason
he’s not asking for credit is that there never was a threat of the oceans
flowing into American cities. But Obama is still stating that this threat
continues to this moment, and he is still predicting death and destruction and
trying to convince the citizens of America to give up their autos and air
conditioning in an effort to save the polar bears. This pitch is unseemly and a
lie, and it is simply a power grab and wealth redistribution scheme, the likes
of which Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton would love.

If anyone should go to jail it’s the Obama
administration for allowing the EPA to issue massive environmental regulations
that invade the liberty of every American citizen and kill thousands of jobs,
forcing people who were once employed and independent of government control
over their lives, to have to accept food stamps and welfare in order to support
their families.

Death Valley and the Sahara Desert used to be oceans,
but forces beyond our comprehension caused the water to evaporate, the land dried
up and deserts formed. So how do liberals explain this naturally changing occurrence,
which happened prior to any human occupation, and certainly before the evil automobile
or a coal-fired power plant can be blamed as a source of pollution that caused
the drastic change in the environment, similar to what is now supposedly destroying
the world? Liberals don’t explain their radical plans. They just tell people to
shut up and do what Obama and his liberal pals tell them to do, or go to jail.

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Democrats seem to identify the world by
misrepresentations and crises. They claim that the Republicans have a “war on
women”. Can anyone who is able to think
at all really believe that Republicans are waging war against their sisters,
mothers and daughters? And the phrase “war on women” is directed at women in
the Republican Party as well as men. What form of idiot would say such a thing?
A modern Democrat, that’s who. If Democrats could control themselves to state
that only Republican men hate women then maybe they could make the case. But to say that Republican women hate their
own daughters and mothers, and by logical extension, themselves, is totally
absurd. But that’s the Clinton-Obama Democrat for you.

Republicans are “sexists, racists and homophobes”. These
things can’t be believed by a reasonable person when one understands that each
of the hated groups listed are also represented in the Republican Party. A woman,
a black and two Hispanics are/were Republican candidates in the 2016 race for
president, so how can Republicans hate the people who are their neighbors and
fellow political allies, and for whom they are voting? Democrat charges are idiotic and make no
sense.

On the crisis side of Democrat campaigning is Global
warming/Climate change. President Obama recently said that Miami is having a
problem with a rising ocean, but failed to tell us what street in Miami now has
salt water running in it. The fool man is a liar, but a lie that frightens you
is a lie that will open your pocket book and will convince you to surrender
your freedom for the sake of safety, so the liberals attack on this flank every
time they can. I have a little sympathy for Paul Ehrlich, Ted Danson and other
of the earlier global warming supporters because they were only believing the
lies/miscalculations of the warming/change schemers. But now we’ve lived long
enough with this filthy lie to know it’s a total falsehood and to know that there’s
no basis to it at all. Barack Obama is lying through his teeth when he advances
his assertions of rising oceans, and I know that he is only furthering his “fundamental
transformation of America” when he mentions this subject.

The Democrats try to scare people and develop hate and
envy toward Republicans, whereas Republicans try to use logic and the
furthering of one’s own interests in himself/herself and their families to get
votes. This approach by Republicans is a
bit more difficult to sell because it requires thought, an open mind and the logical
processing of ideas. Some examples are:

Republicans believe in rewards for the work that each
individual performs.

Democrats believe in resentment and envy for the
rewards that others receive for their work.

Republicans believe in the constitution and the rule
of law.

Democrats believe that they should be able to
manipulate the constitution and the laws to better serve their latest projects
and vote-getting schemes, like allowing illegal aliens on a wholesale basis
into our country while ignoring the future damage this will do to our nation
and the resulting lack of availability of jobs for future Americans.

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Today’s liberal/Democrat plantation has little
resemblance to the cotton fields of the Old South. There are now food stamps instead of the
slave kitchens. Cable TV is common. And automobiles and air conditioners can be
seen at most of today’s Democrat slave quarters.

The daily existence of Democrat-sponsored slaves in
America is more pleasant than it was 150 years ago, but rest assured: the poor
welfare recipient today is as enslaved by the liberal/Democrats as the cotton
pickers were in the pre-Civil War South.

The Democrat Party has been cleansed of the likes of West
Virginia, Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, former Grand Kleagle, Grand Wizard and
Exalted Cyclops of the KKK, of whom Hillary spoke so fondly and adoringly at
his passing a few years ago. The new Democrat KKK has shunned the bed sheets of
old and now wear Saville Row suits with silk ties and speak of Republican
sexism, racism and homophobia while trying to make themselves believe the lie
of rising oceans and global warming.

The log cabins are long gone and replaced by the failed
streets and projects of Detroit, which city was destroyed by repeated Democrat
mayors who chased away Ford, GM and Chrysler with their high taxes, crumbling
infrastructure and a soaring crime rate. The high paying jobs went away with
the auto manufacturers and were replaced with homelessness, poverty and
hopelessness as one liberal/Democrat administration after another used race and
a resentment of wealth to assure that the votes from the poverty-stricken
population kept them in power.

The new broader-defined plantation now also has some
Hispanics in its midst. The lesson of Detroit and why the federal government had
to bail it out hasn’t been learned by Barack Obama, because he is letting more
tens of thousands of Mexican and Central American illegal immigrants into our
country in hopes of their becoming the new slaves that vote Democrat regularly
in exchange for a bare subsistence to keep them alive and voting. The problem
is that crime, whether in Detroit or Chicago, always follows poverty and lives
in its midst.

Sanctuary cities, while formerly having a good
reputation of providing actual “sanctuary” for those escaping mistreatment in
their native country, are now used as cover for illegals and other criminals,
and these scum prey on the decent people seeking real sanctuary and trying to live
better lives than they were allowed to have in Mexico or Guatemala.

The “sanctuary” thing is what is wrong with this whole
immigration idea as it is being practiced today: Those escaping unemployment in
Mexico are just bringing the problems of that country to America where it will
swell and hold new-comers in the poverty they are trying to escape. Those
enclaves will only contribute to a feeling of resentment as Democrats hold them
hostage for their votes, and when no improvement is seen to their economic and
housing situation under Democrat rule they will lash out, and the Democrats will
once again direct the hate and blame at Republicans, who would much prefer
legal immigration in which people can get assimilated and become prosperous, as
their predecessors did upon coming to America: learn the language, get a good job
and not have to live in Democrat-provided tenements.

Be assured, Hispanics who are assimilated and part of
the middle class, fear these illegal arrivals as much as any other American
citizen fears them, and we see the proof of this in the number of Hispanics who
are swelling the Donald Trump and Ted Cruz voter bases.

Monday, March 7, 2016

Hillary is again having an argument both ways. She is criticizing
her opponent, Bernie Sanders, for voting seven years ago to not bail out
General Motors when it went through its bankruptcy troubles. At the time Hillary
was in the Senate and did vote for the GM bailout.

However, it hasn’t been that long ago that Hillary was
blaming the filthy, old-tech auto industry for causing the lie of global
warming, which her liberal Democrat crowd claims is melting the icebergs and
drowning coastal areas like Manhattan Island, Miami, Daytona Beach, The
Bahamas, Key West., etc. But if you know, as anyone with any measure of common
sense knows, that these places are not threatened by rising oceans, then
someone needs to tell our ruling liberals in Washington, because they believe
that it’s happening and they believe that your rights to live your life as you want
to live it should be curtailed in order to limit the amount of carbon you use
as a part of your daily life. Washington liberals intend to use the EPA to
continue to issue new, more restrictive regulations to force you to live as
they believe best. In fact Obama just a month or two ago reminded us, inaccurately,
that Miami is suffering from rising waters. His warming was intended to let the
EPA charge ahead and issue some more job-killing regulations. This effort on
Obama’s part is completely in keeping with his promise to “fundamentally
transform America”, and he’s actively doing just that.

Anyway, Hillary seems to be unable to understand that
she can’t ride both sides of an issue to victory in her campaign against
Bernie. Either the auto industry is bad because of the polluting cars and trucks
it makes along with the automobile plants themselves causing pollution, or it’s
good because of the jobs it creates and the wonderful products it makes to
satisfy the wants and needs of her voters. She is taking both sides at
different times, but it appears that her Democrat voters aren’t deft enough to
see her slight-of-hand. So Hillary will likely succeed in taking credit for
both positions because it appears Democrats have such hate for Republicans and
for American capitalism and prosperity that they will buy every lie Hillary
tells.

So we now learn that Arnold Schwarzenegger has
endorsed John Kasich for president. This
rather undermines Arnold’s reputation as a manly-man by his endorsement of the
wussiest candidate in the Republican stable.

What a strange political period we live in. John
Kasich is the candidate who refuses to argue issues face-to-face with the other
candidates, nor will he address possibly divisive issues in debates when the
moderator specifically presents the occasion to do so to him. He’s the
adult-in-the-room who at every turn reminds us that he is the revolutionary
governor of Ohio who has done marvelous and wondrous things by reaching across
the aisle, which is exactly what conservatives don’t want to happen any longer.

Conservatives in the United States are voting to
demonstrate that they are sick of Kasich-like milque-toast candidates who call
themselves Republicans, and the Republican establishment had better begin
listening to its base.

Poor Arnold! He no longer gets good movies to star in,
is looking rather old, and now supports the candidate for president who is in
dead last place among his candidate peers.

And Mitt Romney, whom I fully supported and voted for
in the 2012 election, can shut up and just go away with his abuse of the 2016
Republican candidates. Mitt is a great
man, but he’s a political loser and needs to keep silent from now on.

Sunday, March 6, 2016

President Obama repeatedly and always states that when
major events occur he didn’t know about them until he saw the news report on
cable news. What Obama doesn’t understand is that it’s difficult to keep up
with events from a golf cart. He has advisors all over his administration, at
taxpayers’ great expense, to keep him informed so he can anticipate troubles
both at home and abroad and try to reduce their impact on our nation and our
economy. But the fool man will not pay attention because he doesn’t care. He prefers
to appear cool, relaxed and uninvolved.

The day after Obama said he had been successful at “containing”
ISIS, terrorists attacked and killed 130 people in Paris, and not long after
that, terrorists attacked San Bernardino killing at least 15 people who were
attending an innocent party. Obama lacks
skills at containing terrorists, and terrorism seems to thrive with him as
commander in chief. While Obama pretended to bomb ISIS camps in Syria, ISIS flourished
and spread into Iraq, from which the great military commander, Obama, had
withdrawn our troops shortly prior. We also saw the introduction of Russia into
the area under Obama’s watch, which makes everything more dangerous and more
inflammatory. This giving of superior military position to our enemies is what Obama
calls “winning”.

Obama has no idea of how dangerous Iran and North
Korea are to America because he will not attend Presidential Daily Briefs, but
instead prefers to “read” them. If he reads his PDBs like he follows the news
on TV our nation is in serious, imminent trouble. One only hopes that no
serious attacks occur on Obama’s watch these last few months of his disastrous
administration or millions of Americans will suffer and die, and that’s the
truth.

Saturday, March 5, 2016

As one could predict, Hillary is criticizing
Republicans for what they are saying during their campaigns, when the actual
actions of Bill and Hillary Clinton throughout their political lives are much
worse than anything the Republicans could say.

When Donald Trump made the reference about Mitt Romney
being on his knees, it could well have been a reference to Mitt begging for Trump’s
endorsement during Mitt’s presidential campaign four years ago, or maybe not.
But it’s a certainty that Trump’s words are nowhere near as bad as Bill Clinton’s
actual actions in the Oval Office with a young lady, while using a cigar and her
blue dress as entertainment. And what about Bill Clinton testifying in court
that oral sex is not really “having sex” in any conventional way, thus
insinuating that his actions in the Oval Office should not even be mentioned or
considered. Was that a “presidential” way to behave? And it’s not his words
that are as offensive as it is the actions that his words attempt to excuse.

Similarly, Hillary is saying that corporations should
treat employees better and not ever lay them off or fire them. Evidently the good lady has conveniently forgotten
that she fired the entire White House travel staff without cause during the Clinton
administration, and replaced them with personnel provided by a friend of the Clintons.
The staff she fired had served many presidents over many years, and one of the
staff was nearing retirement when the ax fell. But in order to serve her friend
for financial gain, the entire staff was dismissed by Mrs. Clinton.

The White House travel staff, unlike a private
company, did not need to make a profit, it was a government agency paid for by
the tax payers, so it was just for her own personal-profit reasons that Hillary
fired the staff. But a corporation must make a profit or the entire base of
employees will be without jobs, so occasionally staffing adjustments have to be
made by the leadership of the company to protect the whole corporation and
allow it to profit and continue to employ people. This sort of thing goes on in
companies all the time, whether the leadership of the company is of a conservative
or liberal political leaning, while the firing of the White House travel office
by Hillary Clinton was mean, selfish and unnecessary.

Hillary also forgets that she paid her female Senate
staff members less than she paid her male staffers, but every time she opens
her mouth she is heard belching her usual rhetoric about making certain that women
are always paid the same as men. No wonder Hillary is thought of as a liar and
not trusted by a majority of Americans.

If Hillary didn’t have two faces she would have no visage
at all. She is a complete and unapologetic liar, but that’s what it takes to
win in the Democrat party.

Friday, March 4, 2016

After beating Bernie Sanders badly in primary voting
two days ago, Hillary told her audience that “What America needs is more love
and kindness”. Aside from sounding like a 1960s Dusty Springfield top-hits song,
her words almost sound like something Bill Clinton was whispering in the ear of
Monica Lewinski as he prepared to stain her pretty blue dress in the Oval
Office one day during his presidency.

Hillary is a throw-back to the 1960s with her idiotic
expressions of love, kindness and compassion, while her party ruthlessly holds
millions of poor people in poverty and dependence on government and exposure to
high crime rates, and while her party encourages millions of illegal aliens to
cross our borders to spread disease, generate more crimes in sanctuary cities,
take jobs that Americans could use and eventually vote for more of the same as
good, bought-and-paid–for Democrat voters.

Meanwhile she lies to her hapless, faithful listeners
about the evil Republicans and their sexism, racism and homophobia. Maybe she
could tell her admirers the truth: that her unprotected email server was assuredly
broken into, an opinion expressed by General Michael Hayden, former director of
the CIA and the NSA, thereby allowing the Chinese, Russians, Iranians and North
Koreans to get state secrets from her and likely endangering the lives of many foreign
nationals who secretly worked with Americans to assure the protection of our
nation and our population. She could let
them know that she in under investigation by the FBI for her illegal server
usage and the Top Secret messages she passed through it. That honesty would be
an ultimate expression of love on Hillary’s part. Or she could remind her
followers of the tens of thousands of Syrian “refugees” Obama is promising to
bring here in spite of ISIS claiming that there will be terrorists in their
midst when they finally arrive in America. After all, Hillary was once a part
of the Obama administration and must take some responsibility for the danger
those two fools placed the nation in.

Hillary would better serve her followers if she would
inform them of how they are being mistreated by high taxes, unlawful EPA
regulations, an inundation of illegal aliens who are taking their jobs, and
about the horror of Obamacare which is destroying not only healthcare but also
is eliminating jobs in the private sector, and how Obama’s “fundamental transformation
of America” has caused every aspect of our economy to perform worse than it did
twenty years ago. But that would call for her telling the truth and breaking
ranks with Obama, and that’s not going to happen. So she falls back on the
hippie, pot-smoking illogic of her 60s youth and appeals to
“love and kindness”, which may sound cool when you’re in a drug-induced haze,
but will not save you when Islamic terrorists shoot AK-47s at you.

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Republicans still have plenty of time to defeat their
own candidate for president, and Mitt Romney is the latest voice assuring a
Democrat win in November. Recent articles demonstrate the unattraction of
Hillary (on March 3, 2016 the NY Times
reported “Hillary…Turnout Trouble”) and the support for Trump (on March 2, 2016
the AP reported “Trump Dominates With
Huge Turnouts, Wide Base Of Support”).

And there’s recorded support on the part of Mitt
Romney for Donald Trump: Back on February 23, 2016, You Tube posted a video of Romney expressing complete respect for
Trump. On March 2, 2016 The American
Mirror quoted Romney as saying “I’ll support the Republican nominee”.

So today (March 3, 2016) we awaken to the AP reporting that Romney is calling
Trump a “phony” and urging Republicans to shun him.

What the hell is going on with the idiot leaders of
the only political party that can possibly save America from the assured
destruction of Obama and Hillary? Is it something in the imported Swiss artesian
water that they’re drinking? Has their Chateau Lafite Rothschild been spiked?
Perhaps the caviar is not to their discriminating taste? These fool idiots are
destroying that last best hope to save America and are ignoring the will of the
people, expressed in their votes for Trump only two days ago, and a bit more
distantly in other primary elections. And the fool Paul Ryan, the Speaker of
the House, refused to express an opinion about Mitt’s AP quote in Fox’s morning talk show today (March 3, 2016).

And while all of this directed opposition to the votes
of average, frightened and angry male, female, black, white and Hispanic Republicans
across the nation is going on, these same elites leave Hillary untouched and
basking in the praise of those who would destroy this great nation. Romney lost
the last presidential election, so how does he become the advisor as to how to
win the next election?

Actually the best idea for how to win the 2016 election
is to NOT listen to Romney this time, since he lost last time.

Americans had better rise up and tell Mitt to keep his
remarks to himself and leave the fly-over crowd to decide the direction America
will take via their votes, because the Republican establishment is a big part
of the problems this nation faces, and they will only make things worse if they
dominate the discussion.

The more one sees reports about current political
events the more one doubts the sanity of America’s political class. Last night on
Fox News Channel’s Special Report,
panelist David Gregory, a liberal NBC reporter, stated that the No Trump
movement is important because Trump is divisive and he uses bad language
occasionally, so he must be prevented from running for president in the Republican
Party. I appreciate the great concern that Mr. Gregory has for the presidential
aspirations of Republicans and I know he has only the best wishes for
Republicans in the 2016 election cycle, but when the hell did a liberal give a
twit about Republican successes? The only reason liberals are forming the No
Trump movement is that Donald Trump is being very successful getting followers
and their votes, and because he is unifying not only Republicans, but he’s
attracting many voters from the failing campaign of Hillary Clinton and here
dangerous liberal/socialist tendencies.

I think that the push by the left should be “No
Hillary” because of the dangerous legal position she is in, with her email
secrets being made available to China, North Korea and Iran, her use of an
illegal email server, and the investigation of her selling of influence in
exchange for cash investments in the Clinton Global Initiative to foreign
leaders while she served as Obama’s Secretary of State. And even the likes of
General Michael Hayden, who is a former head of the CIA and the NSA, said that
in his opinion, our enemies did absolutely hack into Hillary’s unprotected
email server and got whatever secret information Hillary left exposed there,
and she definitely placed American interests and American and foreign agents at
risk of death with that hacking.

Even though she is beating Bernie Sanders in the rigged
Democrat primary voting, the Democrat-base turnout has been shockingly low and
unenthusiastic. It might therefore be best to dump this so-yesterday old
liberal candidate and allow someone who actually inspires and excites the
voters to take her place.

Democrats are frightened at the enthusiasm Donald
Trump and Ted Cruz are getting, and fear the Clinton era is at an end, so they are making
an attempt to get rid of the Republican threat to power that they so desire. I
offer my sincere thanks to Mr. Gregory for his great concern for the welfare of
the Republican Party, but I must turn down his offer to stop the Republican
path to victory. I also wonder why the Fox panelists let his anti-Trump pitch
go unchallenged. It appears that even many conservatives don’t understand what’s
in play here, and what is at risk with the constant battering of our leading Republican
candidates.

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and speaker of
the House Paul Ryan were all over Donald Trump on Tuesday for allegedly not adequately
turning down an offer from David Duke, former KKK member, to endorse Trump’s candidacy
for president. From what I’ve heard of the chronology of Duke’s offer and Trump’s
non-acceptance of it, our two establishment Republican leaders were just
blowing off their mouths in typical establishment fashion, because Trump lost
no time saying no thanks to Duke. It’s not pleasant to watch McConnell and Ryan
self-righteously bark at Trump and lecture him in front of the nation. Trump
has upset the establishment Republican applecart by not kissing their rings and
for taking a hard stance against the things that are hurting America and placing
the nation at risk, and the Republican establishment is scared witless.

The lecture they gave Trump would have been easier to
take if they had kept their word following the last two elections when they
said that if they could get Republican majorities in the House and Senate they
would undo Obamacare and all of Obama’s unconstitutional and illegal string of
national disasters. So the responsive American public gave them majorities in
both houses and they blew it; they passed a budget that fully funded Obamacare,
Obama’s dangerous immigration policy, all of the EPA’s job-killing regulations.
Obama’s socialist America is still in place and thriving, with Republican help.
His enormous spending is still in place. His high unemployment rate is still in
place. He’s still allowing tens of thousands of illegal and potentially
terrorist-related immigrants to pass freely into the United States. The national
debt is still growing fearfully. And Obama’s probably immediately giving illegals
welfare payments as they enter the country, in order to keep them in the
Democrat camp until he can issue an executive order to allow them to vote. In
short, America continues to deteriorate, and McConnell and Ryan are largely responsible,
so they scold Trump.

It may have been helpful to the cause of freedom and
liberty in America if McConnell and Ryan had, instead of bawling out Trump
about David Duke, reminded the nation publically how the idiot Hillary Clinton eulogized
former KKK member and Democrat, Robert Byrd, upon his death, calling him a
friend and mentor and praising him lavishly. Trump tells Duke to take a hike with
his endorsement and gets whipped for it, Hillary praises Byrd, gets no bad
press for doing so, and still gets away with calling Republicans sexists, homophobes
and racists. Is there no longer any common sense or decency in politics? Indeed
there is not.

It’s a sign of the times that Republican leaders feel
they have to attack their own in order to stay in the good graces of the
liberal press and liberal Democrats in Washington, and that’s why Trump is not
thought well of by establishment Republicans: he won’t play the politically correct
game and instead tells the truth about what’s happening to our great nation,
and that’s why Trump is getting the adoration and the votes of real Americans
who are fearful of losing the nation they know and love.

It’s a shame that the Republican establishment would
rather lose to Hillary in November than to win the next presidential election
with Trump. But, sadly, that’s exactly where they’re leading us.

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Chelsea Clinton recently spoke out of both sides of
her two-faced mouth to a group of 75, largely older, women (she really packs ‘em
in). In her talk she said that Hillary will “stand her ground and give no
purchase to the racist, homophobic, sexist rhetoric and policy ideas…of the
Republican side, it’s also important to have a president who knows how to find
common ground”.

Setting aside the fact that the Republican party has
many blacks and women in its membership, and that one of each of these target
groups of the evil Republicans were themselves Republican candidates for the
presidency that Hillary also seeks, and forgetting that Chelsea’s father has
been accused of raping several women and was convicted of sexually abusing at
least one woman, what are the idiot Democrats taking about?

If what Chelsea said was true about the Republicans, what
Democrat in their right mind would ever want to “find common ground” with a “racist,
homophobic, sexist” ? If what Chelsea is saying were true, the Obama
administration would have the whole bunch of them in jail, or at least under
investigation. And what does Chelsea’s charge say about Carly Fiorina and Ben
Carson, both of whom were (one still is) Republican candidates for president?
Is Carson a racist and Fiorina a sexist? One holds out hope that young
Democrats will actually begin to speak the truth and make logical arguments
that deal with reality and lay off the BS crap that Hillary spews, but the
lovely Chelsea seems to have only Democrat lies and talking points to discuss. And
also forget that the Republicans have two young Hispanic candidates vying for
president and then bounce that fact off of Hillary’s attempt to defeat an old
Jewish man and you may wonder if she is practicing Jew-hatred with her
candidacy against Bernie Sanders.

But to make one additional flash-back to Chelsea’s “common
ground” reference, it’s always the Democrats who insist that Republicans join
their side in any argument or policy issue, not the other way around. A Republican will always either agree specifically
with a Democrat proposal, or will agree in principle to a Democrat scheme but
will tweak the specifics of their proposal and respond with a compromise
position. This is what happens with the
Democrat position that immigration laws are broken and that we need to rewrite
all related legislation to correct the fatal flaw causing all the trouble along
the border. Instead of telling Democrats “NO” and informing them that the
problem with immigration is that the Obama administration will not enforce the
laws already on the books and is illegally allowing all comers to illegally
enter the country, the idiot Republicans agree to rewrite the law, with the
Democrats insisting that the new legislation permit illegals already here get permanent
citizenship, to get free healthcare, to get immediate welfare and that the
American government will transport the families of all illegals already here
into America so that the families can remain together (the families could have
stayed together in Mexico or Central America, but that makes too much sense and
doesn’t serve the broader issue of the Democrats which is to get as many poor, uneducated,
dependent people here as possible) and then give illegals the vote so Democrat politicians
can remain permanently in office.