hindu intolerance Really ??

Conspiracy by terror groups to invade in India with the help of Indians has never been thorny for the invaders. To quote a very prominent example from history, Man Singh – a trusted general of then Mughal emperor Akbar, who included him among the Navaratnas of the royal court; on the instructions of Akbar, ditched Maharana Pratap in the battlefield (Man Singh was sent by Akbar to Maharana Pratap to make a treaty with Akbar and accept Mughal sovereignty). Not only Mughals, but even the British rulers always worked on ‘divide and rule’ policy, as a result of which many gullible Indians supported the British rulers to succeed in their malafide intentions. To quote an incident of the year 2008, the terrorist attacks of ‘26/11’ in Mumbai were implemented with a pre-planned conspiracy that trained the terrorists to wear saffron wrist bands (Mauli or Kalawa) with Hindi speaking skills and having them equipped with identity proofs of Hindu names (under the directions of Late. Ajmal Kasab and his gang) in order to create suspicion over Hinduism, accrued due to slain ATS Chief Hemant Karkare for having arrested Sadhvi Pragya Singh and Lt Colonel Prasad Purohit for the 2008 Malegaon blasts as per the statement of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist Abu Jundal.

This “Intolerance” debate started after the recent ‘Dadri’ incident. ‘A Hindu group killed a man on beef issue’ was the news that got spread, but after thorough investigation, the truth came out to be a bit different. All the intellectuals, film makers and celebrities, who organized the whole #AwardWapsi campaign were only talking about Hindu intolerance. But when A.R. Rehman got fatwa, it was not considered intolerance, no one even talked about it; nor did anyone return award.

The statement of Amir Khan (who’s the brand ambassador of ‘Incredible India’) on India’s being unsafe has created a lot of clamor not only in the lanes of parliament but throughout the country too by tarnishing India’s image on the international platform. Mr. Ajit Vadakayil – retired Merchant Navy officer, who wrote an open letter to Amir Khan over social media a year back, questioning the funds allocation for the donation received by ‘Satyamev Jayate’ (an Indian Television talk show hosted by Amir Khan); had to face arrest as repercussion of his brave act by, reason being – the former had revealed Amir’s association with some group working in the name of a particular religion (as per media reports) that may enhance communalism in the country and trigger the outrage.

A case has been registered against Amir Khan for his “Quit India” remarks which shocked the whole nation and defamed India internationally on the issue of growing intolerance.

Today these so-called “intellectuals” and “celebrities” are talking about “intolerance”, but let’s take a look at the track-record of “intolerance” of the same people to the atrocities inflicted on Hindus:

Thirteen Years of Killings in Tripura by the NLFT (Refer link (Note: NLFT is the acronym for The National Liberation Front of Tripura)

As per the wordings of Mr Stephen Knapp in his blog “Kashmir: My experience in Srinagar”,

“As many as 150,000 Kashmiris have been killed or disappeared during the 1992 to 1996 years because of the insurgent terrorists. However, more than 400,000 Kashmiri pandits have been driven out of Kashmir and into India, who are now living as refugees in squalid camps, due to ethnic cleansing by the Muslims.”

The list goes unending.

Despite the “intellectuals and celebrities” being “intolerant” to the aforesaid, let’s take a look at how this paid media misrepresents Hindus via following references:

A self-explanatory article by Dr David Frawley on clear definition of Hindu Fundamentalism (Refer link )

Coming to the point of beef consumption, many “intellectuals” wrongly quote that Hindus used to eat beef in Vedic times, which is a Big-time Academic Fraud. Refer link to see the “Glaring example of deliberate academic fraud” which clearly proves otherwise with a real-time example.

As per Dr. David Frawley (Director, America Institute of Vedic Studies): “We find that in the news media, including that of India itself, anti-Hindu attitudes are common. Hindus are spoken of in negative way that is not done relative to religious groups whose behavior has been more violent, exclusive or oppressive.”

This exhibits that intolerance must be shown on several issues, on which we are serene. Let us feel pride in being intolerant on the issues which are related to national integrity and public welfare rather than falling prey to the terrorist and anti-national powers.