An Enemy of the People and a Civil Action: Similar Characters and Situations

After reading the story "An Enemy of the People" by Henrik Ibsen and watching the movie "A Civil Action" similarities began to appear, especially between two main characters. In the story this is Dr. Thomas Stockmann, who makes a discovery about pollution going on in his town that is endangering the people there. In the movie the main character is Jan Schlichtmann, a personal injury lawyer, who also takes on a case of pollution that is making the citizens of Woburn sick. These two characters not only have similar situations but actions and personalities as well.

In "An Enemy of the People" Dr. Stockmann is a medical officer to the baths. These baths are where people and tourists go to heal themselves and treat their bodies. The baths however, are the source of pollution that Dr. Stockmann discovers. Normally this would be a fortunate discovery but the mayor, Thomas' brother Peter, does not want this information to be public knowledge since the baths are a major source of income and business for the town. In "A Civil Action" Jan Schlichtmann takes on a case in the town of Woburn where many people and children are contracting Leukemia. He discovers that two factories in the town are dumping waste into the water and causing the townspeople to get sick.

Dr. Thomas Stockmann responds to his situation by not backing down. The town council does not want his discovery to be leaked so they try to discourage him from printing his findings in the town newspaper. This does not work and Thomas begins to go out on his own against what everyone else wants him to do. His determination causes trouble for him and his family but, Thomas decides to continue with his drive to get the information to the people despite what anyone else says. Jan Schlichtmann responds to his matter in similar way. His case could be settled outside of court with a money payoff but, he decides that this is not sufficient and refuses the money thus taking the case to court. This decision he came to on...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...Character Analysis and Reflections
On an Enemy of the People
The play An Enemy of the People illustrates how a person who fights for the collective interest of the public has become an “enemy” of the people in town. In this paper, character analysis of Tom Stockmann, Peter Stockmann and Hovsta, trying to conclude evaluate Dr. Stockmann should be considered as an enemy of the people.
The character of Dr. Stockmann should be considered as a good person who places the general interest of the public above everything. There are many good aspects of this character, for example, when he finds out the truth of the baths, he puts his principles above his own desires and gains, not tempted by financial rewards. He is honest and shows great personal integrity both in scientific research and in communication of his ideas. Tom is a perfect idealist who thinks all other people are just as good as he is. As s man of principle, he believes that he is absolutely right in caring about all their people’s health. Even if many other people may not understand him immediately after he announces his findings, he never gives up even when he is steadily stripped of the home, job and social status. The spirit is admiring, but the way he deals with this problem is not considered...

...ESSAY: AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE
Harry Latirofian
07/SP_CORE_1006_22 The Global Challenge
An Enemy of the people is a drama filled with ethical dilemmas and issues that are largely were caused by the contrasts between the Stockmann brothers. Thomas Stockmann is jovial by nature and likes to be surrounded by people like him that are intelligent and hard working. His brother in other hand is a representative of the conservative world-order. Thomas Stockmann or as he referred in play as Dr. Stockmann is very conscious of his duty as a citizen and he isn’t afraid to go against the mob of arrogant people, which are the majority in that town, and to point out that they are in denial: “Dr. Stockmann: …The majority has might on its side--unfortunately; but right it has not. I am in the right--I and a few other scattered individuals. The minority is always in the right.” (pg. 71, Act IV), but Peter Stockmann, on the other hand, is the person who can sway the mob to his side, by saying what the mob wants to hear.
We can see more clearly the difference between two brother if we would consider their’s personalities from the deontological point of view. One is a doctor, who would have to give a Hippocratic Oath in order to practice and it is well known that one of the key elements of the Hippocratic Oath is to help people with all your knowledge: “…. I will apply dietetic...

...An Enemy of the People
Truth is something that should be sought for by all; or at least that is what one would think. In actuality, sometimes in politics and in public matters the truth is kept a secret, or is evaded whenever it becomes inconvenient. In Henrik Ibsen’s play this is exactly the case. When Dr. Stockman tries to deliver the truth to the public he faces many troubles that raise questions as to what a man’s duty is to his community, family and self.
The truth found by Dr. Stockman in the play, that the baths were polluted, is something he believed the community needed to know. He was simply trying to hold up his part and give the knowledge that the community could be in danger. He was trying to pay his duty to the community. Dr. Stockman was really looking out for the good of the people. He wasn’t looking for fame or recognition. The mayor knew very well that the Doctor was correct in his findings; he knew that the water was polluted and potentially dangerous, but he pretended not to believe it. He didn’t want to look bad and he didn’t want the whole community to go into economic suffering due to the pollution. Instead of giving the truth to the people as a true mayor or any politician should do. He actually hid it and he schemed against the doctor, even though it was his own brother. It should be the main goal of a politician to help and look out for the citizens, but the mayor was more worried about...

...﻿
Scenario Involving Civil Liability and CivilAction
Jacquelyne Anderson
Professor Phillip Edwards
CJ499-01
September 14, 2014
In this scenario project I will identify four alleged crimes and one criminal civilaction. In addition, I will apply principles involving criminal law relevant to the criminal justice practice, and I will demonstrate my understanding of civil liabilities relative to criminal justice agencies, and practitioners. Furthermore, I will identify case laws relevant to the possible civilaction that could be brought against the police officer, the department and the city. After addressing these issues, I will have described a scenario involving a civil liability and a civilaction.
When identifying the four alleged crimes and the one criminal civilaction, regarding this scenario project, the four alleged crimes are: 1) attempted robbery, 2) drug possession, 3) carrying a gun, and 4) assault and battery. After speaking to a female victim, Officer Jones noticed an individual who partially fit the description, and walked toward them. Officer Jones identified himself, and told the individual to stop. Unfortunately, this individual did not stop, and kept on walking from the officer, and the officer shouted again identifying himself, but this...

...factors.
Distinctiveness: The extent to which a person behaves in the same/different way in different situations. If in different situations, person behaves in same way, distinctiveness is low. Whereas, if in different situations, behavior is different, distinctiveness is high.
Consensus: The extent to which other people behave in the same way in a similarsituation. If a person’s behavior is same as others in a particular situation, consensus is high. Whereas, if a person’s behavior is not same as others in that situation, consensus is low.
Consistency: the extent to which the person behaves the same way at different times in similarsituations. If the person behaves same way in different times (similarsituation), consistency is high. If the person does not behave the same way in different times (similarsituation), consistency is low.
Based on these concepts, we attribute internal/external causes to individual behavior in the following way:
Errors and Biases in Attribution
Fundamental Attribution Error
The tendency to underestimate the influence of external factors and overestimate the influence of internal factors when making judgments about the behavior of others.
Self-Serving Bias
The tendency for individuals to attribute their own successes to internal...

...Happiness or Duty?
Arthur Miller’s, An Enemy of the People, depicts an intriguing playwright in which the differences of opinions between two brothers leads to a town revolution and the expulsion of one brother from the community. One brother, Dr. Stockmann, believed the contamination of the water in the town’s health spa was sufficient reasoning to be shut down. The other brother, Peter Stockmann, took an opposing stance believing that the health spa was the towns only means to economic salvation, and that closing the spa would detrimentally affect the entire population of the town. The town stood behind Peter, and the town kept the spa and maintained its financial prosperity, while Dr. Stockmann was shunned and left feeling that the town he loved had chosen the wrong priorities and was not fulfilling the moral duty to preserve life. As Peter is the protagonist in this story, the question to whether his actions were moral or immoral must be raised. The stance that this essay will take in answering this question is the Utilitarian standpoint described by John Stuart Mill.
Utilitarianism must be defined if to be applied to this question. Before Mill, Utilitarianism promoted the idea of utility, or the promotion of pleasure over pain. Pleasure is then described as a happiness that all people wish to achieve. John Stuart Mill goes further to contribute that “some kinds of pleasures are more desirable and more...

...truthful with the majority. The power within these governments does not corrupt, truth and fear corrupts them. Possibly the fear of a loss of power. The truth is what enlightens peoples’ actual feelings. It corrupts people, making them irrational and unpredictable in their behavior. Truth of a great white roaming the waters in Jaws is hard for authority figures, like the mayor, to grasp. Instead of polluting the water with a toxic agent, Spielberg polluted it with a gigantic shark. Similar to An Enemy of the People, in Jaws, the residents of Amity Island on the Atlantic coast, who are dependent on the tourist trade for their livelihood, keep their beaches open in spite of warnings from Police Chief Martin Brody and scientist Matt Hooper that a gigantic great white shark roams the waters. In An Enemy of the People and Jaws, Jaws conveys a stronger message of truth to the audience through the visible danger of the infested waters overlooked by the authority figures of the town, demonstrating that the truth must not be hidden or diluted even if it counters the wishes of the authorities.
Although both mayors put the economic well being of their town above safety, mayor Larry Vaughn of Amity Island proceeded to keep the beaches open when the danger was much more apparent than that in An Enemy of the People. Mayor Larry Vaughn was faced with a...