As we know, yesterday was the 90th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I noticed that Google recognized the anniversary:

A screenshot of Google's homepage yesterday, with an acknowledgement of the 19th Amendment ("90th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment") beside a pink-ribbon check mark beneath the search box.

What struck me about this page is not only that Google elected not to create a celebratory Google Doodle (which they are known for doing in honor of everything from Dilbert to Pi Day to Vivaldi's birthday), but that the graphic they did choose was a pink ribbon. True, it is in a check-mark shape instead of looped around like a breast-cancer-awareness ribbon, but it is a pink ribbon nonetheless.

I have seen the lack of a 19th Amendment Google Doodle described as "slightly odd" elsewhere. The choice of the pink ribbon in combination with no doodle could suggest, if not a lack of interest, a lack of ideas about how to represent women graphically. There has been a Google Doodle celebrating International Women's Day that used a "female symbol" in place of one of the "o"s. (I do not know where this doodle ran; I just found it in a gallery.) And this year Google Russia marked International Women's day with pink and pretty flowers. So those ideas are used up. Are "circle-and-cross" "pink flowers", "pink ribbon", and "hour-glass-shaped red dress" all the visual rhetoric we've got to represent women?

One discussion board to which I won't link suggested that Google should have made the "oo"s into boobs and the "l" into an ironing board. Perhaps it isn't just that we have a sparse visual rhetoric for women, but that we have a sparse visual rhetoric for women that is not demeaning.

Sure, it's a little thing, and I don't have any answers here; I just thought y'all might like to a place to discuss this small thing, and the larger concept of the visual rhetoric(s) we use to represent femininity and women.

Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.

This Strikes Me as Odd

As we know, yesterday was the 90th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I noticed that Google recognized the anniversary:

A screenshot of Google's homepage yesterday, with an acknowledgement of the 19th Amendment ("90th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment") beside a pink-ribbon check mark beneath the search box.

What struck me about this page is not only that Google elected not to create a celebratory Google Doodle (which they are known for doing in honor of everything from Dilbert to Pi Day to Vivaldi's birthday), but that the graphic they did choose was a pink ribbon. True, it is in a check-mark shape instead of looped around like a breast-cancer-awareness ribbon, but it is a pink ribbon nonetheless.

I have seen the lack of a 19th Amendment Google Doodle described as "slightly odd" elsewhere. The choice of the pink ribbon in combination with no doodle could suggest, if not a lack of interest, a lack of ideas about how to represent women graphically. There has been a Google Doodle celebrating International Women's Day that used a "female symbol" in place of one of the "o"s. (I do not know where this doodle ran; I just found it in a gallery.) And this year Google Russia marked International Women's day with pink and pretty flowers. So those ideas are used up. Are "circle-and-cross" "pink flowers", "pink ribbon", and "hour-glass-shaped red dress" all the visual rhetoric we've got to represent women?

One discussion board to which I won't link suggested that Google should have made the "oo"s into boobs and the "l" into an ironing board. Perhaps it isn't just that we have a sparse visual rhetoric for women, but that we have a sparse visual rhetoric for women that is not demeaning.

Sure, it's a little thing, and I don't have any answers here; I just thought y'all might like to a place to discuss this small thing, and the larger concept of the visual rhetoric(s) we use to represent femininity and women.

Welcome to Shakesville

Welcome to Shakesville, a progressive feminist blog about politics, culture, social justice, cute things, and all that is in between. Please note that the commenting policy and the Feminism 101 section, conveniently linked at the top of the page, are required reading before commenting.