Yet More Sexual Insanity

Simplifying the “social issues” can be a challenge, but they’re chiefly about sex, which of course means human behavior in regards to sex. The two big ones are abortion, of course, and so-called homosexual “marriage.”

Sex isn’t new to human history, despite what many people today might think. The key for civilization has always been for there to be standards that are conducive to the social fabric.

Success doesn’t mean being puritanical or Victorian. Instead it’s a combination of common sense and people keeping their private life private.

To read more about examples where common sense is out the window and the wall between private and public life is ignored, check out the following by Bill Muehlenberg. If you think this country can survive such idiocy, well, I disagree.

The architects of the sexual revolution have a lot to answer for. Part of the 60s counter-culture revolution, the sexual anarchists did all they could to remake society in their own sordid image. And sadly they have basically succeeded. The levels of sexual insanity seem to be at an all time high.

But scarier yet, there seems to be no end in sight to the perversion and degeneracy. Everywhere we look we see more bitter fruit from the 60s sex revolution. A day does not go by without more examples of how Western societies are committing sexual hara-kiri.

So let me offer you four more recent examples of this. Undoubtedly next week I will have another four or so for you. But these matters must be pointed out, if for no other reason that it might produce a backlash of common sense and moral revulsion. Who knows, maybe this can be turned around if enough folks wake up to this reality.

Let me begin in Europe. Consider this headline: “Sex therapists call for legalisation of ‘virtual’ child porn to ‘relieve paedophiles’ urges’.” The article begins, “Two sex therapists have sparked outrage in the Netherlands by calling for ‘virtual’ child porn to be legalised to relieve the urges of paedophiles.

Videos

Quotes

“If by the liberty of the press were understood merely the liberty of discussing the propriety of public measures and political opinions, let us have as much of it as you please: But if it means the liberty of affronting, calumniating and defaming one another, I, for my part, own myself willing to part with my share of it.” —Benjamin Franklin (1789)