What a cop out, Frank! You know damn well it’s not about Barb (or anyone with or without PTSD) beating HERSELF up. When has Barb ever done that, publicly?

It’s about Frank Report allowing “Retard” — someone who, much to his obvious chagrin, can take no credit in any “victory,” or impart any knowledge, or understanding, or any entertaining, insightful anecdotes — to constantly verbally abuse others — especially those who CAN and DO offer real value here — and are therefore the greatest threat to “Retard” — on your site.

“Retard” has NO redeeming value, makes no salient, original points, as you claim. What? When?

No, “Retard” ONLY regurgitates, reduces others thoughts and ideas down to their crudest, ugliest, most offensive form.

Most often, “Retard” distorts [its] victim’s words or position, as casually as [it] also distorts facts, to make [it’s] putrid arguments.

“Retard” does not encourage “robust debate,” as you say, Frank. “Retard” does not merely strongly disagree. “Retard” insists on having the last word, chiefly using insults but sometimes even flattery — whatever works — to bully its victims away from contradicting it, to deflect and discourage discourse. “Retard” cannot stand “debate,” to be opposed. “Retard” is a very bad loser. And a loser, it is.

“Retard,” “Bangkok,” “Toots,” “Emoji Troll,” “Smiley,” “Scott (Tex) Johnson” (IMO) and all the other alias’ it uses, is a toxic, possibly dangerously disassociated soul with clear, severe, malicious gender identification issues whom you previously promised to curtail, but have permitted to, once again, overtake Frank Report like a plague. It may not get many hits on its gratefully segregated “Bangkok” etc. posts, but it permeates the comments section, nonetheless, under its many alias.

I was hoping you’d say you’ve been too busy to control it rather than defend it as you are now.

But before I sign off, as so many other Frank Rerport commenters and contributors have done due to this unchecked, cancerous invader and, now, your reneging on your promise to contain rather than propagate it, perhaps you can offer a more honest answer to explain your attachment to “Retard,” etc.?

I do believe you and your so-called Trump chump “friends’,” such as Roger Stone, devotion to POTUS and his offensive (to many) ways — including his verbal abusiveness and personal attacks on Twitter, Social Media — is part of why you defend and pretend this type of narcissistic bully behavior has little if any impact on individuals or society. Why, a good insult, you say, even brightens your day.

Yet, in truth, last time we spoke on the phone about Scott Johnson after I’d read another of his insults toward YOU, you were SEETHING with anger toward him and reiterated that you thought of him as an “asshole” and said you wished you could shut him down but know he’ll come back using alias’ with a vengeance.

In fact, verbal and emotional abuse contributes to causing disassociative orders, mental breakdown and social violence. In fact, KAR, Salzman, Bronfman and their minions relied on some of these same techniques themselves to emotionally breakdown and mentally control their victims, who then, in turn, victimized and suborned others with the same, despicable methods.

Boggles my mind as to why else, Frank, when you have worked so long and hard — and nearly singlehandedly in the final stages — to rid society of a toxic, malignant, narcissist like KAR, you would condone one like Scott Johnson, “Retard” whatever etc. right under your nose on your own blog?

Perhaps restraining orders are in order if retaliation against you or your readers is the issue as you HAVE told me. After all, Twitter had to ban Scott Johnson and his alias to protect themselves and their site users from his abusiveness.

***

Frank Parlato response:

I agree with much of the above. Retard lacks manners and, because Retard is anonymous, It has the courage to be rude. Yet Retard serves a function – as a devil’s advocate. If only Retard had manners, It might be persuasive.

Heidi writes that “Retard,” “Bangkok,” “Toots,” “Emoji Troll,” “Smiley,” and “Scott (Tex) Johnson” (IMO) are one and the same.

I doubt that Retard is Scott Johnson. I think that Retard and Bangkok are the same. I don’t know about the rest.

Frank Report allows anonymous comments – and many of my best leads came from anonymous comments. Some of them bore fruit as I later saw in charges against Keith Raniere and company.

To have eliminated all anonymous comments would have crippled the Frank Report and its investigative work in the beginning.

It is the fact that people – dumb and smart – lying and truthful – can submit just about anything and leave it to me to vet – which has been a tremendous boon to the investigative work of the Frank Report.

Of course, it has its downside. Assholes sometimes take over. Nice people like Heidi are sometimes offended. Sensitive people like Barb get their feelings hurt by allowing an open forum.

Over the years, there have been only a few who dared to comment in their own name on Frank Report: Toni Natalie, Susan Dones, Barbara Bouchey, Joe O’Hara, Heidi Hutchinson, Angela Ucci, Christine Marie, and a few others, among the actual fighters of Nxivm.

Scott Johnson is one of the few non-Nxivm combatants who posts comments in his own name and I am thankful to him for that. I wish more would do that.

Heidi wrote that the “last time we spoke on the phone about Scott Johnson after I’d read another of his insults toward YOU, you were SEETHING with anger toward him and reiterated that you thought of him as an ‘asshole’ and said you wished you could shut him down but know he’ll come back using alias’ with a vengeance.”

I don’t recall that at all. I was certainly not seething. I rarely seethe as it is a waste of good mental energy that can be used to actually accomplish something. As I recall, I said I wished Scott would stop flooding Frank Report with one-line responses to almost every comment. It was meant half humorously, and as if it was nothing more than a minor nuisance. If you took my sarcasm as seething, you misunderstood.

I also offered a solution. I said, it would be better if he made one or two thoughtful comments per post. [Scott sometimes offers very interesting insights, and things I hadn’t thought of before – mixed in between his penchant for insulting others.]

What I said I would do at the time and what I have done since, is generally try to limit Scott to only a few comments on each thread. I have continuously deleted his more vicious comments about you – as I have done also with Retard.

I also delete Scott’s rude comments to many other commenters – except Nice Guy – since Nice Guy and Scott seem to like to insult each other and it amuses me. Sometimes it is pretty clever.

By the way, Heidi, I am not afraid of retaliation by Scott, Retard, or anyone else. I don’t think Scott would come back with any aliases. He seems happy to post under his own name. I admire him for that.

As for those who might try something illegal like hacking, I will do my best to defend against that and will report it to authorities. And give tit for tat wherever possible – maybe with compound interest added.

About the author

Frank Parlato

62 Comments

Love the Heidi meltdown. It’s almost better than the lame-stream media after Trump’s election and the recent Mueller report wrap-up. As to why I continue to make as many comments as ever, whether they are approved or not, there are two primary reasons:

1. I don’t know which Frank will post and which ones he won’t;

2. I don’t know which comments Frank may find useful and/or amusing; and

3. It’s an easy way for Frank and myself to keep in touch without others knowing what’s really going on.

P.S., Heidi will probably notice I said there are two primary reasons, but I provided three. That may be enough to set her off permanently. I’m not concerned about reading this explanation, because she will explode when she first sees three numbered points. LOL

Solid POVs on both sides. I agree w/Heidi that civility seems to have slipped a bit in the comments section but it is nowhere near as awful as it used to be. I applaud the encouragement of discussion and agree with the need for continued dialogue but if insiders are afraid to share new insights then we aren’t learning anything and FR comments becomes just a speculation echo chamber – which isn’t very helpful. But then again maybe being helpful isn’t the goal for most here.

Heidi I do hope you do not stop commenting on this blog because I find your comments with their mix of humor, pathos and insight to be invaluable. Leaving means those other voices have won.

I have to agree with Frank when he says he doesn’t believe Scott is Bangkok/Retard/Clicky. I think Scott is just who he says he is and he will say whatever he thinks under his own name.

You have faced a lot in this lifetime and stayed strong and that’s to be admired. You are looking for answers around your sister’s suicide and that’s to be commended. You are doing this while being a loving and attentive mother. Don’t let those voices drown out your own.

Thanks, Leon. Good advice as usual not to let one’s own voice be drowned out —

I’m just very disappointed that, once again, we’ve lost another important voice to this deranged, notorious, fraud, narcissist, bully, cheater — Scott Johnson — and IDK how much more of Schlock and his alias’ bullshit Claviger can or should have to put up with either.

“Toni Natalie, Susan Dones, Barbara Bouchey, Joe O’Hara, Heidi Hutchinson, Angela Ucci, Christine Marie and a few others.”
This is the list of people I want to hear more from. Why is it that the second one of them posts, they typically get viciously attacked by commentors without a NXIVM connection?

NJ, because there are those here who believe that anyone who ever put one toe into NXIVM for at any time or for any reason, is automatically a wrongdoer, deserving of vicious attacks (as opposed to reasonable dialog / questioning). Thus, you will not be hearing much, if anything from those listed above. There are plenty more, now-absent contributors with good information, by the way. Congrats, all.

I read a quote the other day about freedom of speech. “You have the right to say what you want but it also means you’ll hear things you may not want to”

That’s the problem today. People don’t just not want to hear different opinions but want those opinions shut down, fired, banished, final solutioned.

And for all the hysteria over Trump and his supporters who is being attacked physically almost daily and having service refused at restaurants etc

This is why people became victims of Raniere. Because they have no self confidence no self esteem and wither because of words, criticisms and insults.
Stand up to NXIVM? Hell they can’t even stand up to Scott.

Smart people are not opposed to hearing other peoples opinions. Society as we know it would cease to function if people didn’t have varying opinions.

IMO, people who talk about limiting “free speech” are those opposed to the spread of lies and propaganda…which has become a big problem due to the use of the internet to spread these bullshit conspiracy theories. Free speech means you’re free to voice your opinions, but free speech doesn’t include the right to blatantly lie about others. There is a big difference.

This Bangcock guy (I seriously doubt he’s Scott) seems to be well-versed in the spread of propaganda. He’s obviously been around the block a few times … If you study how any of these online conspiracy theorists operate, you will see the pattern – they incorporate some bits of truth into their narrative, and then add a bunch of “facts ” that aren’t facts at all, in hopes that people will be stupid enough to believe them. Unfortunately many people do believe.

I agree Flowers that people should not be permitted to write blatant lies about people. This shouldn’t be allowed whether their names are used or if its through innuendo. I also agree that people should be able to listen to the opinions of others and not respond in a belittling way when they disagree.

Very astute, Flowers. Exactly what Bangkok aka The Retard etc. does —including trying to get all chummy with key commenters.

That’s something Jeff Peterson’s peeps warned us Dennis Burke does and I might have gone on believing Kok & Tard etc. ARE Burkite’s if not Burke himself had Schlock not deliberately grabbed the cred for being DeezNuts, too. ‘Course Schlock boastfully lies constantly about his proud word power feats like falsely claiming he forced a NX tweet out of Kristin Kruek, killed off Heather Anne, etc.

How some of these assholes are still walking around with their dicks intact is beyond me.

That was a response to Flowers 2:01 post not to her SC response yesterday. I very much agree with SC on all her points here. (Flowers is competitive and likes to be “edgy,” SC, but she does a good job of keeping the MAGA maggots on here underground.)

I’d say most people here do a fine job of standing up to Scott.
Do you really think that commenters on FR want Scott and Bancock’s opinions banished? Or do you think the problem many have with their opinions is in their approach/civility?

Nutjob – the issue lies with the civility of the debate without it spiraling into derogatory name-calling. This is what Frank initially promised when he introduced Barbara to FR. Then Frank decides to change his mind midstream. It’s insulting to the people who have had some experience with Keith Raniere or NXIVM. I’m sure after Keith goes to prison, Frank Report will most likely resort to writing about horses again.

It’s ironic that Heidi (of all people) wants to make criticism of ‘particular people’ off limits, even though she herself has posted more uncivil comments than nearly anybody here. LOL.

Heidi wants to be able to call Bangkok or Scott any uncivil name she wants, including making laughable posts about Dennis Burke being Bangkok, LOL.

Anybody who thinks Bangkok is an ‘attorney’ is a bonafide retard.

Heidi also wants to be able to “shout down” anybody who criticizes any of her buddies (or people she sympathizes with), citing free speech.

However, if Heidi had her way then Frank would ban all posts which criticize any person she deems “off limits” — while still allowing herself to be as uncivilized as she wishes to anybody else.

Guess what?

That’s not how free speech works, Sunshine.

Free speech means not only saying what you want to say, but also hearing what you don’t want to hear.

It’s not free speech to make certain people ‘off limits’ to criticism — especially while allowing ‘open season’ on other people.

Heidi is a basket case and reminds me of Niceguy in many ways.

Both Heidi and Niceguy believe that they alone have the ‘insight’ to know a righteous person from a troll. Also, both of them would define a ‘troll’ as anybody who criticizes themselves or their buddies.

In other words, both Heidi and Niceguy want Frank to use Nazi type tactics to silence any speech that strays from what they wish to hear.

The only difference between Heidi and Niceguy is that I’d personally guess that Heidi’s IQ is about 30 points higher than Niceguy’s IQ — though that’s not exactly a compliment, since I’d estimate Niceguy’s IQ to be southward of 80. 🙂

Regardless of what Heidi claims in this article, the TRUTH is that she’s hated me for a long time simply because I’ve criticized her in the past.

Heidi hates Retard/Bangkok for things that were said about HER in the past.

Heidi couldn’t care less about Retard criticizing Bouchey.

Heidi now PRETENDS to want Frank to ban Retard for OTHER reasons (i.e. for civility reasons) when in reality she’s simply a spiteful person that would celebrate if Bangkok were run over by a bus tomorrow.

Nope, never said (or thought) anything close to any of this. That’s one of the sicko, twisted ways you lie — by misattributing.

Lying, however subtly — as you should know since you’re a free speech expert now, if not a lawyer such as you insist “Bangkok’s” not — is liable — and that’s already ILLEGAL. (Not something Heidi or NiceGuy or anyone wants to just have their way or protect their buddies.). I just want you to obey the law. Something which WILL protect me and my buddies whom you target and unduly attack, by unlawfully using such deceitful methods.

BTW, why do you speak of “Bangkok” as someone other than “Retard” — someone other than YOU — if you’re Retard — who’s said you’re also Bangkok?

Nope. Never said that. I said you TARGET NX insiders — obviously — not that they, we should be especially protected.

In fact, everyone is protected equally from such liable and misattribtions under the laws of this Country — which you are violating, however subtly, whenever you stuff words down someone’s throat they did not say — your deceitful MO used to both discredit, falsely take credit and otherwise harm your liable victims.

Another example of your lies and how your sick, twisted mind works — you oozing asswart Psycho Geriatric Podofile!

Regardless of what Heidi claims in this article, the TRUTH is that she’s hated me for a long time simply because I’ve criticized her in the past.

Heidi hates Retard/Bangkok for things that were said about HER in the past.

Heidi couldn’t care less about Retard criticizing Bouchey.

Heidi now PRETENDS to want Frank to ban Retard for OTHER reasons (i.e. for civility reasons) when in reality she’s simply a spiteful person that would celebrate if Bangkok were run over by a bus tomorrow.

There ya go, again, putting YOUR words in someone else’s mouth, attributing your hateful thoughts to their heads and proceeding to argue against yourself. It’s called “projection” and “acting out” in psyche terms. I don’t hate you, I don’t know you (do I?), my soul is not “hate-filled.”

And the only put down of yours I previously reacted to (if you’re not Scott Johnson — HA! Gotcha again, asshole) was when, as “Clicky,” you practically accused “Just Saying” of prostitution for being offered a “pretty girl” discount on NX courses.

You’re only speaking volumes about yourself whoever you are and your motive is obviously to discredit NX survivors — whether it be to steal the “limelight” of our stories like Scott Johnson or pretend to lawyer well for KAR/Clare/Emiliano like Dennis Burke might be up to, in addition to slandering Jeff Peterson as Deez Nuts, all the “D” fuckers, did.

I like to make people laugh, too. So, maybe I will let you borrow my hat. Gimme your address and I’ll send it.

Scott and Bangkok are obsessed with you and crave getting any kind of attention from you, even negative attention. I have mentioned that before. You are definitely the only attractive woman either one has ever conversed with hence their obsession with you.

I often disagree with “Retard’s” posts and his abusive comments toward other commenters. I did however agree with his post about Barb’s insistence that there is good in NXIVM. Why shouldn’t that subject be open to discussion? Criticism need not be abusive. I also don’t believe that Scott is Retard/Bangkok. Scott seems to be confident enough to post under his own name and to handle any insults that are directed at him, also under his own name. I think he takes pride in that.

Someone arguing that there was some good that came out of NXIVM, is like someone arguing there is some good that comes out of Bangkok comments.
Even shit had its uses i.e. it makes great fertilizer.
****************

As for Scott using his real name and being “himself”…. well kudos to Scott. I am sure his family all enjoy his company. Scott seems like such a loving kind soul. I am sure he is a terrific father and wonderful husband.

“Scott’s” cancerous, misogynist, misanthropist insults were stopped at one point and still *appear* to be — but only after numerous attempts including Frank trying to reason with him (HA!) and not posting his comments with insults — which Scott had many fits about. Frank even took time to edit the insulting words out of Scott’s posts but Scott, who boasts he was “Trump before Trump was Trump,” complained that he “wouldn’t be himself” sans the insults he prides himself on.

He created “Bangkok” when “Scott” couldn’t get his jollies off with the insult Schtick on here and uses a broiler plate, bully “nothing burger” style, IMO. Then has the new “Scott” politely affirm the alias.

But even prior to Bangkok, I believe Scott used alias’ to bolster his comments and/or post his most offensive material on FR in order to discredit, trounce “competing” commenters such as, especially, KRClaviger…while getting his jollies off.

Scott’s had many years of being banned from many blogs he’s attempted to commander in much the same way he’s doing here. He was not banned from Twitter for naught. And not bc he’s a strong republican voice either. Knows even less about MLM’s than politics, IMO, including Amway. I’ve “flirty fished” it out, Scott’s failed every time. He’s a fraud.

Scott’s another narcissistic conman, bottom line. He takes credit for defeating AMWAY on a class action suit he was only named in among many litigants. In fact, AMWAY actually nailed a judgement against Johnson for 50k when he placed false orders, etc.

Likewise, Johnson has tried to claim it was HE who brought down NXIVM (who hasn’t, lol) as well, lied that it was he, Scott Johnson, who exposed NX before anyone years ago on his two-tin-can radio show. He contacts other media to take cred for NX info he’s lifted from FR, IMO — talk to Radar Online — and lies to, slanders, NX insiders on other media. He even threatened to blackmail Barbara Bouchey on here with some alleged info he has on her IF she didn’t respond to his interrogations. And he became pissed at me bc I didn’t, don’t, won’t go on his stupid show having observed how he operates. He’s actually offered relief from badgering me if I go on his show but he knows he keeps it up he’s the one who’ll be crying “Uncle.”

He’s delusional and dangerous, IMO.

I hope Dennis Burke knows Scott Johnson is propogating the notion that Burke is Bangkok, etc. bc Frank is less inclined to edit or ban someone who may be “Burke” for potential future reference, even to spare the feelings and good name of his associates, IMO.

[Unless someone has video of Burke logging in at University of AZ or wherever Bangkok’s VPN is at? Or is there some other evidence? IMO, Burke MAY be Deez Nuts but not Bangkok or Retard. That’s pure Schlock.

Also, Bangkok/Retard was far from the first to disagree with Barb’s “good in NX” stance. Many have disagreed with that, including me, g, Claviger, several Anons on FR and elsewhere for months now! Retard only punctuated it with swear words and shouts.

Finally, “Retard” is such an overused, dated description of mentally challenged people it’s not even not PC anymore but mentally challenged people I know have far more dignity, integrity, kindness, respect and appreciation for humanity than this “Retard” even if he, obviously, is far more affected than most. If Retard wants to be defined by his disability, “Alzheimer’s” or “Psycho” would be more suitable for him and less damaging to good, admirable retarded people everywhere.

Heidi had zero basis for her accusations. She can’t have any basis, because they are lies. There is no need to be “brave” when the only thing Heidi threw at me was a pack of lies.

I’m the only one on this website who regularly warns others about Amway and other MLM scams in a variety of ways. That means it’s everyone else who is hung up on the relatively small NXIVM MLM scam that has been essentially shut down and doesn’t care about the 10s of millions of new people ripped off by MLM scams every year.

You’re a liar, too. You said you would come on my radio show when Frank comes on. He’s already been on, but then you chickened out. LOL

On second thought, perhaps a point by point rebuttal of Heidi’s comment will “earn” me another story on Frank’s website, as it has in the past, so here goes, with my rebuttal in [brackets]:

“Scott’s” cancerous, misogynist, misanthropist insults were stopped at one point and still *appear* to be — but only after numerous attempts including Frank trying to reason with him (HA!) and not posting his comments with insults — which Scott had many fits about. [I assume the word “Scott” in quotation marks is meant to infer I have posted under numerous other commenters’ names, as Heidi has blathered previously as well. That would be in-correctamundo. I haven’t posted under other names (except for a brief period last fall when I made a few “Anonymous” comments, and one point by point rebuttal even got turned into it’s own story), but it is very fulfilling to know Heidi thinks I have, and I’m sure the real commenters enjoy it as well. Or perhaps not, as I am stealing their limelight. Look up the origin of limelight, it’s an interesting story. I also had to look up “misanthropist,” so thanks for expanding my vocabulary, Heidi! Look in a mirror, that word describes you. I don’t recall any “fits” on my part, other than expecting an even playing field when it comes to insults. Heidi wants to play by “girls rules,” but I believe in equality.]

Frank even took time to edit the insulting words out of Scott’s posts but Scott, who boasts he was “Trump before Trump was Trump,” complained that he “wouldn’t be himself” sans the insults he prides himself on. [Frank edited others’ posts for a while as well, although that appears to have fallen by the wayside. I’m sure Trump would be proud of me for saying that I was Trump before he was Trump. I don’t think you understand the context in which I stated that, do you? You wouldn’t be Heidi without that ugly black hat, so we’re even. LOL]

He created “Bangkok” when “Scott” couldn’t get his jollies off with the insult Schtick on here and uses a broiler plate, bully “nothing burger” style, IMO. Then has the new “Scott” politely affirm the alias. [Bangkok will be annoyed to learn that he didn’t author his posts, or will I be annoyed with myself? LOL The new “Scott” is polite? Please point that out, I’ll correct it immediately, if not sooner.]

But even prior to Bangkok, I believe Scott used alias’ to bolster his comments and/or post his most offensive material on FR in order to discredit, trounce “competing” commenters such as, especially, KRClaviger…while getting his jollies off. [Please, a list of all of those other alias names. I lost track of all of them. LOL]

Scott’s had many years of being banned from many blogs he’s attempted to commander in much the same way he’s doing here. [Being “banned” for teaching others about Amway’s tool scam is actually both an honor and a favor, as I don’t have to waste my time on those sites any longer.]

He was not banned from Twitter for naught. [Naught. Who uses that word? And for that matter, many other strange words you use on a regular basis. I was banned from twitter for supposedly automated tweeting, which is untrue. What is true is I manually tweeted cut-and-paste content. I don’t believe these are the same thing. After all, I am prohibited by the Amway Settlement Agreement from communicating with current Amway IBOs, but only if they own/operate the medium, such as their own twitter account.]

And not bc he’s a strong republican voice either. [No, it isn’t. See above.]

Knows even less about MLM’s than politics, IMO, including Amway. [I’ll forget more about Amway, MLMs, and politics than you’ll ever know.]

I’ve “flirty fished” it out, Scott’s failed every time. He’s a fraud. [I hope you didn’t flirt with me, that’s disgusting just to think about. In fact, I just threw up in my mouth. Interesting you didn’t state what I have done that is fraudulent. LOL]

Scott’s another narcissistic conman, bottom line. [While I have a strong self-image, it’s not a narcissistic one. Who did I con, and how?]

He takes credit for defeating AMWAY on a class action suit he was only named in among many litigants. [There were two lawsuits, the Pokorny v. Amway class action lawsuit, and Amway’s civil lawsuit against lil’ ole’ me. The class action lawsuit was a disaster, a mere wrist tap on Amway. While I tried to have more influence on that lawsuit, my input was ignored, as the lawyers took the money and ran, as they do with most class action lawsuits. However, I kicked Amway’s corporate butt on the civil lawsuit, hands down. One only has to read and understand the Settlement Agreement posted on my website.]

In fact, AMWAY actually nailed a judgement against Johnson for 50k when he placed false orders, etc. [There was no 50k judgment, it doesn’t exist. Also, I never placed a false order, (or etc.) although my upline did try to steal some of my downline volume bonus from me. They didn’t get away with it.]

Likewise, Johnson has tried to claim it was HE who brought down NXIVM (who hasn’t, lol) as well, lied that it was he, Scott Johnson, who exposed NX before anyone years ago on his two-tin-can radio show. [I never made such a claim, and Heidi can’t provide it, because it doesn’t exist. Another made-up lie. At least you’re consistent, Heidi. A consistent LIAR. In fact, in my first telephone conversation with Frank last spring, he stated the NXIVM saga was essentially over and he was looking for a new challenge, and thought that Amway and other MLM scams could fit the bill.]

He contacts other media to take cred for NX info he’s lifted from FR, IMO — talk to Radar Online — and lies to, slanders, NX insiders on other media. [Again, an accusation with no basis. Where’s the links to all of these fantasy stories, Heidi?]

He even threatened to blackmail Barbara Bouchey on here with some alleged info he has on her IF she didn’t respond to his interrogations. [Telling others the truth about Barb isn’t blackmail. Also, my “interrogations” were mere questions. She hasn’t answered a lot of questions from a lot of people, if you consider all of my aliases to be different people, of course. LOL]

And he became pissed at me bc I didn’t, don’t, won’t go on his stupid show having observed how he operates. [I became pissed at you because you’re a jerk, who could have potentially helped with providing information regarding Raniere and Amway, but then proved yourself to be too unstable to believe about anything.]

He’s actually offered relief from badgering me if I go on his show but he knows he keeps it up he’s the one who’ll be crying “Uncle.” [I don’t recall that offer. But since you’ll never be on my radio show, it’s a moot point. I’m SO scared of the big, fat liar named Heidi. LOL]

He’s delusional and dangerous, IMO. [That would be you. LOL]

I hope Dennis Burke knows Scott Johnson is propogating the notion that Burke is Bangkok, etc. bc Frank is less inclined to edit or ban someone who may be “Burke” for potential future reference, even to spare the feelings and good name of his associates, IMO. [I am? Thanks for telling me, I’ll keep that in mind going forward.]

Unless someone has video of Burke logging in at University of AZ or wherever Bangkok’s VPN is at? [I video myself logging in all the time…NOT!]

Or is there some other evidence? [The only evidence is that you’re very unstable, Miss Heidi.]

IMO, Burke MAY be Deez Nuts but not Bangkok or Retard. That’s pure Schlock. [Now I have to keep all of these names straight regarding which ones are me and
which ones aren’t. Thanks, Heidi.]

Also, Bangkok/Retard was far from the first to disagree with Barb’s “good in NX” stance. [What does that prove? I said there were some who benefited from NXIVM.]

Many have disagreed with that, including me, g, Claviger, several Anons on FR and elsewhere for months now! [Which “that” are you referring to, Bangkok/Retard’s view, or Barb’s? If I was any of those people, I would be worried. Thinking like Heidi is solid grounds for being declared insane.]

Retard only punctuated it with swear words and shouts. [So now you’re saying I disagree with myself? LOL]

Finally, “Retard” is such an overused, dated description of mentally challenged people it’s not even not PC anymore but mentally challenged people I know have far more dignity, integrity, kindness, respect and appreciation for humanity than this “Retard” even if he, obviously, is far more affected than most. [I would take a retard over you any day of the week, Heidi.]

If Retard wants to be defined by his disability, “Alzheimer’s” or “Psycho” would be more suitable for him and less damaging to good, admirable retarded people everywhere. [I define you by your instability, stupidity and lying. LOL]

Yolanda, you’ve come to the wrong place if you’re seeking empathy for this cult criminal enterprise. There is very little empathy to go around concerning rape of little girls, tax evasion, racketeering, money laundering, human trafficking, slavery and branding. Nope, you should just move along.

I expect you (of all people) to realize that many of my insults are meant to be taken partially sarcastically (i.e. I don’t always use a smiley or LOL to show sarcasm).

as in, “You fucker”.

While I admit that some of my insults are meant to annoy the people that I find most annoying, such as the infamous Heidi and Claviger THE COCKSUCKER WHO LOSES MOST OF HIS CASES, my words still aren’t necessarily meant to be taken 100% literally.

I thought you understood that, you brainless bastard.

(another example of sarcasm without use of smiley)

I never expected anybody to take my insults to heart.

Yes — I do my best to annoy the assholes on your site (like the lowly Claviger) but I always do it WHILE making points that I truly feel are valid.

The more valid my point, the more people like Heidi get annoyed.

People insult me left and right, Frank. You actually allow it and don’t even consider it ‘impolite’ as long as I’m the target of the insults. The more vicious the insults against me, the more you laugh and allow it.

In your mind, I “have it coming”. This is true even if Heidi (or somebody else) has started the argument by making up bullshit stories like Denny Burke is really Bangkok, etc.

However, the moment I verbally retaliate then you suddenly speak about me not having manners. LOL.

I just don’t see the big deal here since I get insulted far more than I dish it out.

Most of my insults are not meant to be taken literally. Well, except for the ones against Niceguy since that pathetic wimp is a loser (and if I were him I’d have a paternity test done ASAP, just to verify that his offspring is really his). 🙂

I will not refer to you as “retard”. Now that Frank has acknowledged finally that you are not Scott. I now know that you are a normal highl school aged kid.

I have noticed Bangkok that you stopped using the “high school” analogies and metaphors after the 3rd time I called you out.

Bangkok we both know why you refer to yourself as the “retard”. I am truly sorry for what is going on in your personal life.

I can only tell you that one day you will not have to deal with those people. The cruelty that you show at the Frankreport is born from the treatment that you receive in your personal life. There is light at the end of the tunnel. You are young and you have a full life a head of you.

Bangkok life is always painful and hard. Occasionally there is some joy.
Keep your head up and your chest out and you will persevere. I promise you.

P.S.

I will make sure to have the paternity of my children tested. My daughter is just too intelligent to have come from my genes; and my son is quite tall, dark and very athletic.

Thank you Bangkok for your uncompromising cold hearted and sage advice. Bangkok you are wise beyond your years.

If I’m not mistaken, Nice Guy said he had no kids, Bangcock.
Anyways, I think the question most people have about your posts is what is the point? You only seem to post for the sole purpose of insulting people, and you claim to have no connection to nxivm or anyone involved, so why do you keep posting?

Actually we know having kids is to much of a pain in the ass.
Besides with my sugar momma we can afford to take nice vacations. Next month we are going to Turks and Caicos and staying at the Parrot Cay Como resort.

Scott I imagine next month you will be taking the kids to the public pool. I hope you have a blast!!!!!!!!

Too bad your parents didn’t have the same opinion. Having kids is one of the most rewarding things in life, IF you’re normal. Enjoy your vacation. My kids are grown up, unlike you. Still too scared to come on my radio show, aren’t you? LOL

Your exact thrice repeated words about Scott Johnson in one phone call were, “he’s an asshole,” in what I perceived as a seething, certainly convincing, tone. You’ve said that about him on here, in writing, as well.

If you want to take it back now, fine, enjoy him, all your “assholes” — let them go on thinking you find them so brilliant and hurting others undeservedly — but I’m done seeing people who NX already put through hell for half their lives unable to freely express themselves without being badgered by such ignorant, blowhard, malicious assholes using the same gestapo, rather crime cartel, tactics NX does, now that NX is finally subdued and dissipated enough they can begin to breath and maybe partake in a little of that Joy de vive, as promised.

You don’t know who your friends are or aren’t, Frank. That’s your problem.

Susan Dones is wrong about Kristin Kreuk. She refused to answer questions. That was her own doing. Why not answer why she claimed Kreuk left in 2009 when that was definitely false? All she had to do was answer honestly.