Harman's law to reject white workers for ethnic minorities is slammed by campaigners

By DANIEL MARTIN Last updated at 19:11pm on 16th March 2008

White men could be legally blocked from getting jobs under new anti-discrimination laws being considered by Labour.

Employers would be able to give jobs to women or ethnic minority candidates in preference to other applicants, under the plans unveiled by equalities minister Harriet Harman.

If two candidates were equally qualified for a position, employers would be able to reject the white person or the man in favour of a black person or a woman.

But the plans are due to be criticised by business leaders and last night, even equalities campaigners expressed doubt.

Miss Harman - known as Harriet Harperson for her politically correct views - wants to look at how to bring U.S.-style "positive action" to Britain, saying it is vital to ensure the workforce more accurately reflects the demographic make-up of the population.

She says too many women and people from ethnic minorities are being held back because they cannot break through the "glass ceiling".

The new laws would only come into play where two equally qualified candidates had applied for the same post, allowing the employer to tip the balance in favour of minority candidates.

Businesses would not be compelled to favour the female or black candidate but the law would be changed to ensure they could not be sued for turning down a white man.

The proposals would also allow universities to select more female students in male-dominated subjects such as science.

But equal rights campaigners said the new rules would have a limited effect, and that action should be targeted on equal pay.

Katherine Rake of the Fawcett Society, which campaigns on equal pay, said: "How you would really hold that up in a court of law is not clear and, if it isn't, employers may be reluctant to use it.

"You are probably talking about a handful of cases."

The present law says employers are allowed to say they welcome applications from minority candidates, and they are allowed to promote jobs to specific groups.

"If Harriet Harman really wants to help women in the work place she should strengthen the existing laws on equal pay. We have recently put forward proposals to do just that and our proposals would have a real impact on women's lives."

A spokesman for Harriet Harman said: "This is under discussion but no decisions have yet been made."

The changes would be included in the new equalities Bill, which will also give new rights to mothers to breast-feed in public. Golf clubs would have to give female players equal access.

Miss Harman also wants to force companies to conduct "pay audits", reviewing staff salaries to ensure they are not underpaying women.

But she is facing opposition from within the Cabinet on this from ministers who are worried about antagonising business yet further.

Last year Miss Harman called for all-black shortlists in constituencies with high ethnic-minority populations.

She said that unless action was taken, it would take decades for the make-up of the Commons to accurately reflect the make-up of British society.

But the plan immediately came under attack from ethnic minority MPs on the Labour backbenchers - saying black people should be selected on merit

If there was such blatant discrimination against natives, the rage over that and the lack of protection against criminals is going to bubble up into a new regime. “Rights for English first. Safety for all.”
This is going to blow up very badly.

13
posted on 03/16/2008 12:43:24 PM PDT
by tbw2
("Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" by Tamara Wilhite - on amazon.com)

This kind of thing is no joke--as a white woman whose husband was unable to work for a year-2 kids in HS, one at Univ. I was called to interview for a state job where I was fully qualified and high on the register--93 pts. After being interviewed and chosen by managers twice, I could not be hired until every minority above the grade of 70pts. was hired or turned the job down.

I was so incensed, I called the dept. head at state capitol and told him I could not afford to travel to more job interviews just to be chosen and then rejected by the state authorities.

After I complained, in a short time I was called for a 4 month temporary job at the rank for which I was registered. While in that capacity, I finally got on permanently.That is where I learned to hate the beaurocracy from the inside.

It is darned frustrating to be rolled for a job by a less qualified applicant just because of the color of our skins.

it is vital to ensure the workforce more accurately reflects the demographic make-up of the population.

Vital to whom? Certainly not the white men that are being discriminated against.

So-called "affirmative action" here in the US does the same thing. PC requires that jobs be filled according to demographics, regardless of whether or not people are actually qualified for the positions.

This scheme is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Indeed, there is legal precedent for this idea. Dr. Wilhelm Stuckart was able to succinctly create a legal framework for this scheme quite a while back. That framework was called the Nuremberg Laws. The left has learned well from Dr. Stuckart.

I was at Carls Jr. here in Los Angeles and trying to ask the girl behind the counter if I could still drink a shake or do their new shakes require a spoon. The guy behind me, seeing my frustration in trying to communicate with someone with limited English told me that he applied for a job here and was turned down because he didnt speak Mexican (ok, he said Spanish, I say Mexican).

This already happens in the UK and here. The only difference is that they aren’t afraid to admit that the purpose of all this is to wipe out Whites from Western Civilization and give it to non-reproducing entities, or to savages.

Big business was the main push behind it here. Corporations funded the front-activists and lawyers to do it. Quite a few Fortune 500s paid for filing briefs in favor of “affirmative action” in a Michigan University case not long ago.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.