"Offensive" Gay Blood Donation Ban Could Be Overturned
Despite Aids RiskHomosexual lobbyists decry
"homophobic" law, say right to give blood more important
than 50% increase in HIV infections it would create

Homosexual rights activists are trying to
get a ban overturned on accepting blood donations from gay and bisexual
men in the UK because it is "offensive," despite the fact that
such a change would increase the risk of HIV infection by 50%, in the
latest example of political correctness lunacy that is endangering society.

"Rob McDowall, a campaigner on gay
rights, has branded current blood-transfusion policy "homophobic"
for not accepting blood from men who have had homosexual relationships,"
reports
the Scotsman.

"This outdated, homophobic and offensive
rule must be changed to allow gay and bisexual people to give the gift
of life," added McDowall.

But there's a very good reason that gay
and bisexual men are banned from donating blood in the UK, and it relates
to basic public safety.

According to the latest figures held by
the Office of National Statistics for HIV, nearly 50 percent of new HIV
cases between 1996 and 2005 involved gay and bisexual men, even though
they statistically represent just 5-10 per cent of the population (other
estimates say 3 percent).

"While the absolute number
of cases of HIV in heterosexuals diagnosed annually is greater than for
men who have had sex with men, when the size of the respective populations
is taken into account it can be seen that the relative risk of exposure
is very different," according to Dr Brian McClelland, strategy director
at ScotBlood.

He added: "Figures would indicate a man who has
had sex with a man is seven times more likely to contract HIV than a heterosexual."

"Abolishing the rule for gay men would increase
the risk of an HIV-infected donation entering the blood supply by about
five times, and changing the rule to allow gay men to donate one year
after they last had sex with a man would increase the risk by 60 per cent,"
said McClelland.

For militant gay campaigners like McDowall, the fact
that changing the law would mean 50 percent more people would have their
lives ruined and possibly die from the scourge of HIV matters little in
comparison to ensuring that homosexuals aren't "offended".

Cold hard facts and a sober understanding that overturning
the ban would see HIV and AIDS skyrocket is not good enough for homosexual
lobbyists, who have found support from the Labour government every step
of the way in ramming through legislation to elevate gays almost above
the law and make everyone else second class citizens.

BBC
presenter Robin Page was arrested in 2002 for giving a speech in which
he argued that countryside campaigners and farmers "should be given
the same rights as blacks, Muslims and gays". How dare Page suggest
that we mere scum should be under the same law as the precious homosexuals?
They are the God race and we are just disgusting "breeders,"
as the homosexuals can rightly call us without being arrested for committing
hate crime.

Perhaps I should even refrain from publishing
this article since as a UK citizen I could be subject to arrest under
section 5 of the Public Order Act for making homophobic remarks. Homophobia
has been warped to mean any comments that aren't positive towards homosexuals.
We are told to be tolerant of alternative lifestyles but the people that
lead those lifestyles are completely intolerant of anyone using their
free speech to disagree with them.

In January 2006, an Oxford University student
who said to a police officer, "Excuse me, do you realise your horse
is gay?"
was arrested and taken to court for making homophobic remarks. Any
comments that cause "harassment, alarm or distress" are now
illegal. Most gay people would be "distressed" to hear that
their lifestyle is neither moral or healthy and so an advocate of that
view would be subject to arrest for expressing an opinion.

Homosexuals even have their own special
wing of the UK's police force to protect them - Green was detained by
an officer wearing a fluorescent vest with 'Minorities Support Unit' written
on the back.

Since church-going Christians are now also
a minority in the UK, and are constantly subject to abuse and humiliation
in the media and society - will a special police unit be assigned to protect
their rights? Don't bet on it.

This entire debacle again underlines how
political correctness is just another pretext for political thought control
and that its application to the most bizarre and damaging ends is a greater
threat to society than the supposed ills it seeks to address.

------------------------------------

Get your exclusive Prison Planet.tv membership
today and enjoy a plethora of multimedia content as well as access to
live video streaming of The Alex Jones Show - click
here to subscribe.