Why do democrats hate so much? A thought to ponder.

Did you know that Matthews actually used to guest-host for Rush? Its funny how political expediency works. Rush is the very same person he always
was, Matthews has mutated into some form of vitriol spewing hack, but since he plays for the right team, he can call for the death of anyone he
wants.

But what I say still stands. If it'll make you liberals feel any better, let me rephrase it and say that just those liberals in power and the ones
who follow them blindly, they are the ones that are hateful.

Of course, because it is socially acceptable to hate repubicans/conservatives. Rush is a perfect example (thanks for providing this) if you went to
some stranger in the street, some democrat in office, and threatened the same thing, Johnny-Law would be paying you a visit.

Say it about someone on the right? You get your own tv show!!!

Scroll up and read what I wrote concerning all of Rush's blatant racist comments, and other hate-filled diatribes from other members of the
Republican party - including a Presidential candidate's lead aide as well as a candidate for the Young Republican's chairmanship.

more Limbaugh "Love":
"Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."
* Response to a black caller he was having a hard time understanding

"The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."
* As quoted in Flush Rush Quarterly (January 1993)

"Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said
it."
* As quoted in "Hey Rush, when it comes to sports ... shhh!" by Mike Freeman at CBS SportsLine (27 January 2007)

"I'm going to tell you, what's good for al-Qaeda is good for the Democratic Party in this country today. That's how you boil this down. And it
doesn't have to be al-Qaeda. What's good for terrorists is good for John Kerry. All you got to do is check the way they react."
* (15 March 2004)

"I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus - living fossils - so we will never forget what these
people stood for."
- Rush Limbaugh, Denver Post, 12-29-95

Here are some other fine, upstanding Republicans doing exactly what you are accusing the Dems of doing:

"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual gay sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to
polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. All of those things are antithetical to a
healthy, stable, traditional family and that's sort of where we are in today's world, unfortunately. It all comes from, I would argue, the right to
privacy that doesn't exist, in my opinion, in the United States Constitution."
- Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA), Associated Press, 04-22-03

"Probably nothing."
- Jeb Bush, during his losing 1994 bid for Florida Governor, when asked what he would do for black people, quoted by Salon on 10-05-02

"We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too.
Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors."
- Ann Coulter, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, 02-26-02

"Quit looking at the symbols. Get out and get a job. Quit shooting each other. Quit having illegitimate babies."
- State Rep. John Graham Altman (R-SC), addressing African-American concerns about the 'symbol' of the Confederate Flag, New York Times, 01-24-97

Your inability to see the irony in your postings has gone well past amusing and you are doing nothing to further your cause. Furthermore - you are
exposing yourself as a fool incapable of reason and intelligent thought and debate.

Alas, not so closed. And these laws are changing state by state every day. Irony, that we have a president in office that still doesn't believe in
the marriage between gay people. In fact, there are more laws PROTECTING gay rights and gays, called "hate" crimes coming out of DC every year.

Funny that there was a provision to protect military people in that same bill and the DEMS took it out.

LOL Look at your avatar! Maybe instead of getting all emotional and your feelings hurt you should look at what Rush was saying in the context he was
saying it. I agree with a lot of what was posted there, and I also know the context it was said in. I said a lot, not all. But who hasn't said
something they regret?

You're changing the question after you've asked it. You asked for one example of a Democratic-ideal that has been demonized by the left. I gave it
to you. There is NO denying this. Look at how many deep-red states have passed, or are trying to pass, state constitutional amendments "protecting
the sanctity of marriage..." and outlawing gay marriage.

It is ironclad fact that the right-wing runs away from gay-rights as fast as you appear to run away from reason.

It's obvious that you are not interested in entertaining anything that falls outside of your sphere of comfort. Instead, you choose to isolate
yourself within the glass-walls of your mind. So be it. Many people in this thread have tried to show you the err of your thought pattern and you
continue to hold fast to your poorly-conceived missive.

I'm done with this thread.

For the record, I'm not a Democrat, nor am I gay. I'm just an average guy who saw someone I thought would appreciate input and intelligent debate.

Too bad I found neither.

Originally posted by Remixtup
LOL Look at your avatar! Maybe instead of getting all emotional and your feelings hurt you should look at what Rush was saying in the context he was
saying it.

I was waiting for someone to bring up my avatar... Truth be told, I have it because I think it is FUNNY. (I also think GWB was an idiot, but I didn't
vote for Obama...)

Are you really going to try and cover for RL by saying it was contextual?

And yet, you ignore my response when I stated that the liberal legislation is passing laws to SPECIFICALLY defend the rights of gays. Historically, I
can find as many dems as well as GOP who wanted nothing to do with gays/gay marriage.

If you feel you can't respond intelligently to my rebuttal, then I feel sorry for you.

And yet, you ignore my response when I stated that the liberal legislation is passing laws to SPECIFICALLY defend the rights of gays. Historically, I
can find as many dems as well as GOP who wanted nothing to do with gays/gay marriage.

If you feel you can't respond intelligently to my rebuttal, then I feel sorry for you.

You must mean this vote, the one that didn't pass. Yes. Good. While there have been many threads on this subject, I happen to side with my more
liberal friends in the position of "don't ask, don't care".

But that aside. I am aware of this "hate" bill that circulated, and at the time, would have supported it.
Marriage is basically a religious construct. A formal union to unite a man and a woman. It is the basis for society, some would say. For a
civilized society. Looking back on it though, was it a right move, maybe at the time. As a society we have grown, developed, matured. My view has
certainly changed only because, in the grand scheme of things, who gives a rats butt?

Was it considered a hate bill? Yes. By the Gay Rights Community. This issue is evolving though, through federal legislation and state legislation.
I would add supplemental info but when I googled the laws now being passed, I was overwhelmed by the amount, I recommend you do it if curious.

Does this, in effect, defend the current laws against smokers, obese, christains? I only chose three, but I can add more if you feel it necessary.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.