If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

NewCS and CCcam over WAN

I am running a New CS server 1.2 on a windows xp PC. I will change to Linux or use a dream box as the server Later on.

I have a dreambox DM500 with gemini 3.5 that I configured and got working Fine on my Lan.

I then tried the box at a remote address over ADSL and it didnt work.
It was logging on to the server but no services.

In the ccconfig file of the dm500 I changed the Lan IP address to the external Static IP of the server and I kept the same Default 1000x port.
I port forwarded the 1000x port on both ends.

I dont know what else it could be.
In the ccconfig notes there is some mention of hops. Is this the "hops" say from the box to the router to the exchange etc like you get from a TRACERT of an IP address or something else?

I am running a New CS server 1.2 on a windows xp PC. I will change to Linux or use a dream box as the server Later on.

I have a dreambox DM500 with gemini 3.5 that I configured and got working Fine on my Lan.

I then tried the box at a remote address over ADSL and it didnt work.
It was logging on to the server but no services.

In the ccconfig file of the dm500 I changed the Lan IP address to the external Static IP of the server and I kept the same Default 1000x port.
I port forwarded the 1000x port on both ends.

I dont know what else it could be.
In the ccconfig notes there is some mention of hops. Is this the "hops" say from the box to the router to the exchange etc like you get from a TRACERT of an IP address or something else?

# CCcam team uvadi CCcam v1.3.1
#
# Special greets go to Dale Cooper, the RuDream and ofcourse HDLteam
#
# For system without new enigma socket.... capmtserver is your friend
#

################################################## ####################
# friends #
################################################## ####################
# syntax for to add a friend user to CCcam with the max up hops limit
# sharing of emus (default = 1), allow emm (default = 1), and optional
# downshare limits per share (default = no limits) and optional
# downshare limits per share based on caid:id:sid
# emus are shared only one level down, even if no limits given
#
#F: <username> <password> <uphops> <shareemus> <allowemm> ( { caid:id(:downhops), caid:id(:downhops),... } { caid:id:sid, caid:id:sid,... } )
#
# example:
#
# F: user1 pass1 10
#
# user1 gets all our shares at max 10 hops from us
# (our local cards + max ten hops away). He can share down to his own
# clients. He also receive emu shares (if he has 'yes' behind his C: entry),
# and is allowed to send us emm.
#
# F: user2 pass2 0 1 0 { 0100:000080, 0622:000000:1, 0500:000000:2 }
#
# user2 gets only our local cards but no 0100:000080.
# and our 0622:000000 cards only for himself (1 hop down),
# and 0500 cards for himself plus one additional hop down.
# He also gets our emus, and is NOT allowed to send us emm (updates).
#
# F: user3 pass3 5 0 1 { 0:0:3, 0100:000080:1 }
#
# user3 gets all cards at a maximum of 5 hops away from us,
# and get's to share them down two further levels beyond his own level.
# But he is not allowed to share 0100:000080 down to other users.
# He gets no emus from us, and he is allowed to send us emm.
#
# F: user4 pass4 5 0 1 { 0:0:3, 0100:000080:1 } { 0100:000080:15df }
#
# user4 gets all cards at a maximum of 5 hops away from us,
# and get's to share them down two further levels beyond his own level.
# But he is not allowed to share 0100:000080 down to other users.
# He gets no emus from us, and he is allowed to send us emm.
# He is also not allowed to view channel 0100:000080:15df

yes 3.65 will work but not stable and little clients
you really need 10 MHZ if you want more than 200 clients

really and what providers in Europe / Asia / Pacific uses the Zeta card from I*rdet0? There are but three of them and one is defunct now, on satellite right?

Like you have tried over 200 plus users in your country on 10mhz right? None of which are listed in your pay CS service.

100% wrong! You called it a "New irdetogettoblaster" and as a professional dealer you did not even know the name of the device from I*det0 which even all us toy amateurs in Europe / Asia / Pacific know.

What card I*det0 card version as you know it, is the Zeta equivalent to again?

really and what providers in Europe / Asia / Pacific uses the Zeta card from I*rdet0? There are but three of them and one is defunct now, on satellite right?

Like you have tried over 200 plus users in your country on 10mhz right? None of which are listed in your pay CS service.

100% wrong! You called it a "New irdetogettoblaster" and as a professional dealer you did not even know the name of the device from I*det0 which even all us toy amateurs in Europe / Asia / Pacific know.

What card I*det0 card version as you know it, is the Zeta equivalent to again?

Anyone who runs a server even the NewCs Guys and Gbox and cccam Team
will tell you ird 10 MHZ if you want a stable server . 6 Mhz for Viaccess and Seca Cards yes i think anyone can see that name is wrong and anyone on this FORUM knows why ur not supposed to mention irdetitogiggler

Forget to say r u sure only 3 this is also in use in India also
As for plastic well what i can i say i have dealt with proberly millions of plastic over the years from 16c84 , 622s , 3232c,3232cs,6464,7272 and so on proberly more than u had breakfest

Are you saying that 6mhz is too slow for serving the NEW ISSUED irrode CARDS over adsl, where the older cards work fine at 6mhz, or is there something else in the card now that stops its use in servers over the WAN.

I dont mind doing some digging and experimenting but wouldnt mind knowing if it is at all possible or should I just look at aquiring an older card from someone.

Are you saying that 6mhz is too slow for serving the NEW ISSUED irrode CARDS over adsl, where the older cards work fine at 6mhz, or is there something else in the card now that stops its use in servers over the WAN.

I dont mind doing some digging and experimenting but wouldnt mind knowing if it is at all possible or should I just look at aquiring an older card from someone.

Andrew

The newer card in Oz are running fine. On Autech you will see Jonc posted clear instructions on solving your issue with ******2V5 cards.