How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

0 x

☪ "The Battle Cry of The Moronic......America---Love it or Leave it", brokebackboy, "he is right", evilcommie

How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

That warning was delivered to Dubya in August 2001 not Clinton, you stupid fu@king MORON!!!

So, Libs claimed Bush "ignored 9/11", when there was ZERO actionable intelligence stating when, where, what airlines, flight numbers, targets, times, etc. And yet for 2 years, Clinton had his PDB stating that Bin Laden wanted to attack America using airliners, and he did nothing but bang a fat intern and lie about it.

Clinton requested tools to fight terrorism. Congress turned him down. Is there part of that you don't understand?

Deflection duly noted assneck. NOW, again:

So, Libs claimed Bush "ignored 9/11", when there was ZERO actionable intelligence stating when, where, what airlines, flight numbers, targets, times, etc. And yet for 2 years, Clinton had his PDB stating that Bin Laden wanted to attack America using airliners, and he did nothing but bang a fat intern and lie about it.

You are seriously contradicting yourself. You say there was ZERO actionable intelligence when Bush was in office. But there was when Clinton was in office?

G__ D___ you're dumber than hell. Like always. YOU Libterds love to blame 9/11 on Bush, when it was in planning for over 3 years under Clinton's nose. When you apes start pinning it all on Bush, THAT is when I bring up Clinton and HE not doing anything to stop it. I know you're an uneducated inner city trashbag, but I am not here to educate you, or explain myself to you, just because you're too stupid to get it.

0 x

"I love what happened on that ball field this week. The only problem I have with it is he didn't get more of you." - liberaljihad the föggat

Of course that buffoon nobrain thinks just "listening in" would stop them. But when Bush signed the patriot act, the liberals whined to no end....

Can't put boots on the ground, oh but fire away with cruise missiles because they "don't die". What a screwball.

you can keep trying to rewrite history... but you're the only one listening. Curious how the GOP was against wiretaps, until they were for them. Had the done their job earlier we might not have needed the patriot act.

so, what actionable intelligence did we get that Clinton should have acted on...??

Answer my damned questions!!!!!!

So how would wiretapping stop them?????

What actionable intelligence??? How about the 1993 WTC bombing to the USS Cole???? I already told you, dumbass. The 1998 warnings of hijackings.

AND SHOW ME IN THE 9/11 COMMISSION WHERE IT SAID WIRETAPPING WOULD STOP THEM???

Let's see... if we wiretap them we hear what they're planning... how about that? And you still haven't told me what actionable intelligence Clinton had on 9-11. The Cole bombing had nothing to do with 9--, and neither did the WTC bombing, which was planned on Bush, Sr's watch. So, which report told him who to arrest, or which airlines were targeted, or where they were buying their box cutters? Which one?

0 x

— "It will be revealed in the coming months that he was in fact born in Kenya" - 17 Nov 2016zxx

How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

Wishing pain and destruction on another poster because he doesn't agree with your politics? You really are a sick POS.

0 x

— "It will be revealed in the coming months that he was in fact born in Kenya" - 17 Nov 2016zxx

How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

That warning was delivered to Dubya in August 2001 not Clinton, you stupid fu@king MORON!!!

Then why does the text you included say 1998??? All that was is a rehash of the 1990s!!!!! And why didn't he get all this day ONE????

Either way, a "briefing" that tells what happened under Clinton ages ago was NOT relevant to 2001.

After all, Bill Clinton wiped out the terrorist threat, yes???? didn't he??? All those cruise missiles & chasing monica made us safer, right???

Last edited by barrysoetoro on Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

1 x

☪ "The Battle Cry of The Moronic......America---Love it or Leave it", brokebackboy, "he is right", evilcommie

How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

Wishing pain and destruction on another poster because he doesn't agree with your politics? You really are a sick POS.

Oh, that hurts. If only don retread was a Trump supporter and said crap to you.

0 x

☪ "The Battle Cry of The Moronic......America---Love it or Leave it", brokebackboy, "he is right", evilcommie

Of course that buffoon nobrain thinks just "listening in" would stop them. But when Bush signed the patriot act, the liberals whined to no end....

Can't put boots on the ground, oh but fire away with cruise missiles because they "don't die". What a screwball.

you can keep trying to rewrite history... but you're the only one listening. Curious how the GOP was against wiretaps, until they were for them. Had the done their job earlier we might not have needed the patriot act.

so, what actionable intelligence did we get that Clinton should have acted on...??

Answer my damned questions!!!!!!

So how would wiretapping stop them?????

What actionable intelligence??? How about the 1993 WTC bombing to the USS Cole???? I already told you, dumbass. The 1998 warnings of hijackings.

AND SHOW ME IN THE 9/11 COMMISSION WHERE IT SAID WIRETAPPING WOULD STOP THEM???

Let's see... if we wiretap them we hear what they're planning... how about that? And you still haven't told me what actionable intelligence Clinton had on 9-11. The Cole bombing had nothing to do with 9--, and neither did the WTC bombing, which was planned on Bush, Sr's watch. So, which report told him who to arrest, or which airlines were targeted, or where they were buying their box cutters? Which one?

Let's see.... how about after EACH ATTACK, THAT POS CLINTON LAUNCHED A REAL WAR AGAINST TERRORISM AND WIPED THEM OUT??? Boots on the ground, kick in doors?!?!? Wouldn't need wiretaps!!!

Instead he turned it over to the FBI.

Either way, so what if they "monitored"? What would they be arrested for? Is that how it works? Just monitor, then arrest/apprehend? Dick Morris said that Clinton didn't want that. And that figures, since he was a wimp like carter.

I already posted the 1998 PDB that Clintoon got in. And he did NOTHING about it.

0 x

☪ "The Battle Cry of The Moronic......America---Love it or Leave it", brokebackboy, "he is right", evilcommie

How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

That warning was delivered to Dubya in August 2001 not Clinton, you stupid fu@king MORON!!!

Then why does the text you included say 1998??? All that was is a rehash of the 1990s!!!!! And why didn't he get all this day ONE????

Either way, a "briefing" that tells what happened under Clinton ages ago was NOT relevant to 2001.

After all, Bill Clinton wiped out the terrorist threat, yes???? didn't he??? All those cruise missiles & chasing monica made us safer, right???

WOW, you're even too dumb to play stupid!

"Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."

How about Ashcroft doesn't cut the FBIs anti-terrorism budget? That might have made a difference.

OR, how about Bush listens to the warnings that an attack is coming and does something about it.

Then again, you keep ignoring the warnings as if they meant nothing.

What attack was he warned of?

"an attack" doesn't cut it, moron.

The one that told him Bin Laden was going to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, MORON!

You mean the one Clinton got in 1998? You are one dumb f#ck.

Bush got no specific warnings. "terrorists will attack" doesn't cut it. Bubba had 8 years and you gave him a pass.

NO!

I mean this one, Moron.

"We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/

1998, you stupid pos!!!!! Who was president THEN?????

Haven't seen you in days. Too bad the hurricane wasn't powerful enough.

That warning was delivered to Dubya in August 2001 not Clinton, you stupid fu@king MORON!!!

Then why does the text you included say 1998??? All that was is a rehash of the 1990s!!!!! And why didn't he get all this day ONE????

Either way, a "briefing" that tells what happened under Clinton ages ago was NOT relevant to 2001.

After all, Bill Clinton wiped out the terrorist threat, yes???? didn't he??? All those cruise missiles & chasing monica made us safer, right???

WOW, you're even too dumb to play stupid!

"Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings [LIKE 1998 WHEN CLINTON WAS WARNED AND DID NOTHING] or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York."

You stupid pos, that is VAGUE!!!! That tells NOTHING!!!! "Types" of attacks??? WTF does that mean?? Does that give the name of the terrorist????

So if YOU were president, and YOU got told that, tell us all what you would do from what part of it?