<div>Were I to constuct a sentence by writing a gopher, which follows the links of the wiki articles for first, the Theorem which asserts that Proofs are Programs, and second, the wiki articles regarding divers symbolic mathematics computation packages such as Cayley, Maple, and MAXSYMA, and then, pursing onwards my rhetorical design, I wrote a C progam which imprimis, flattens all the links into huge text files and secundus, replaces all instances of periods preceeded by alphbetical characters and additionally succeeded by capital lettters, and replaced these instances with the string "; and furthermore, " while downcasing the aforementioned capital, then in this very self-referential sentence you are reading I could express that by using <source code of my gohper and string munger> and applying the result to "<HTML material from Wiki>" to produce "<flattened, sentence-punctured resultant text>" I will have demonstrated convincingly that on the one hand, Mathematics proves that proofs are programs, and on the other, that programs convert proofs to programs, and that therefore for complexity measurement purposes one can reasonably consider these historically kindred activities as ergodically equivalent; but, above all else, I will further have demonstrated that while I may not actually constrct rhetorical sentences superior to your own, I can, in vivid contrast but murky relevance, produce algorithms which, if actually implemented, would certainly generate rhetorical sentences of greater length than anything that even RGB can hope to type in finite time, although of course I would have to include in the subject line of the mail item, be it ever so huge as to choke our SMTP servers, the referent "(Top that for a rhetorical sentence, Peter:-)".
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Peter<br> </div>