Sunday, December 31, 2006

BRUSSELS politicians have drawn up proposals to create a European income tax which would leave Britons shelling out £510 a year to the superstate.

The rumbling row over the size of Britain’s rebate from Europe resurfaced as an influential committee of MEPs received recommendations for sweeping reforms to the Union’s current funding system.

The Committee On Budgets is facing calls to scale back the current system in favour of a form of direct taxation when Britain’s rebate is re-negotiated in 2008.

Oh Brilliant. We already shell out billions of pounds for an organisation we don’t want to be in as well as having to put up with stupid laws that they shove on us. We also have to be happy with the fact that they have had their own accounts rejected for the last 12 years and now they want to waste more of our money. When will it end?

If they do manage to get a European income tax I will refuse to pay it. Even if it means jail time.

Nottinghamshire Police Authority are considering the fluorescent coats in response to public opinion but detectives say it will blow their cover.

Authority chairman John Clarke said: "Every survey we've undertaken shows people want a more visible police presence on the streets to deter crime.

"Obviously those engaged on undercover duties will be exempt."

But a detective said: "I don't know of any other force that would think of such a daft idea."

I don’t understand why they want to do this. If they want more visible police on the streets why not put them in police uniforms? The only reason I can think of why they would do this to plain clothed police that aren’t undercover is if they are on their lunch break or something. How often would they come across a crime then?

Hundreds of prisoners, including murderers and paedophiles, who have been assessed as posing a serious threat to the public, are being transferred to open prisons. The Observer has obtained an extensive dossier of case studies involving more than 50 prisoners recently transferred to 'soft jails'.

The report compiled by probation officers at 10 open prisons across the UK includes the example of a Yorkshire man serving life for murder after driving his 4x4 car over his victim several times before hitting him with a wheel brace and then disposing of the body in a pond. Despite being classed high-risk, he was moved into an open prison and granted day release - at an address three miles from where the victim's family live.

They also reveal the case of a 42-year-old man held in an open prison in the south-west who is obsessed with his former partner. The man, who psychiatrists say has psychopathic tendencies, had attempted to murder his former partner's lover and was overheard in prison saying that he was going to 'get' his ex-partner. Despite this he was moved from a high-security jail.

Other examples of offenders moved to open prisons include that of a 25-year-old man convicted of blackmail and conspiracy to murder who was judged to be in the most dangerous category of offenders. Despite this, and warnings that he was likely to abscond, he was transferred to open conditions. Another case involved a man held for attempted murder with an axe, having attacked the victim on two previous occasions. Experts warned he still posed a high risk to the victim and had not attended any offending behaviour programmes.

Since 2001, 4,300 prisoners have absconded from Britain's open prisons but the number has increased significantly in recent months, according to staff. Staff say violence within open prisons has increased significantly. Drug use, bullying and the use of smuggled mobile phones has also increased.

Brilliant. I thought Labour were tough on crime? They aren’t even tough on the most dangerous criminals.

During the week I held a poll to see who should be blog of the month. 19 people voted and 11 of those voted for Out From Under leaving the competitors far behind with the two blogs in second place only managing to get 3 votes each.

Saturday, December 30, 2006

The growing reliance of town halls on private contractors is illustrated starkly by the problem of coping with more and more rubbishwhile trying to meet ambitious EU targets to cut landfill waste.

Waste disposal is one of the biggest council expenses. Local authorities in England alone manage about 30 million tonnes of waste every year, at a cost of £3 billion. The volume of waste has been increasing by about 3 per cent year on year.

The cost of cutting back on landfill waste is now a prime factor in council tax increases and will contribute to next year’s inflation-busting rise.

I have a solution and it again involves foreign countries. Why don’t we just pay foreign countries in Africa or other poor areas to take our rubbish? If it costs us £3 billion we can pay poor countries £1 billion for every 30 million tonnes. Council tax bills for waste are then slashed by two thirds saving the country money which can be spent in other areas. The environment is then much better and we have more room for housing

Poor countries could then earn money instead of having us give it to them in aid which never works anyway. This would also employ people in Africa. I don’t know how many but it would be many thousands probably. This would mean that they could try and work themselves out of poverty.

In the end everyone wins because everyone gets something out of it. We also don’t have to give it all to one country. We could spread it around Africa.

Friday, December 29, 2006

SOME Muslims are undermining the battle to rid Britain’s hospitals of killer infections by refusing to wash their hands when visiting sick relatives.

Dispensers containing anti-bacterial gel have been placed outside wards at hospitals all over Britain in a bid to get rid of superbugs like MRSA and PVL.

It prevents people bringing in more infections. But some Muslims refuse to use the hand cleansers on religious grounds because they contain alcohol.

Health watchdogs are so concerned they intend to meet with NHS bosses in the New Year to try and hammer out a solution.

Why do they need to think up a solution? It’s obvious what they need to do. If Muslims refuse to wash their hands they should be banned from the hospital unless they are seriously ill. There is absolutely no excuse for not washing your hands when at a hospital even if it is for religious reasons.

BODIES could be frozen and turned to dust as an environmentally-friendly alternative to cremation.

Corby Council is investigating becoming the first local authority in the country to use the pioneering process called "promession" to dispose of human remains.The process, which is already in use in Sweden, involves freezing the body to -18C and then submerging it in liquid nitrogen, which makes the remains so brittle that they disintegrate into a fine powder when shaken.The powder is then buried in a casket which biodegrades within six to 12 months.Trees are then planted on the site as a memorial to the dead person.The scheme, which is also being considered by some other local authorities, could be used to tackle a shortage of burial plots in Corby.

I like this idea. I think it is about time we do away with graveyards. They serve no useful purpose and unlike a century ago we now have viable alternatives that are environmentally friendly.

We also need the space for housing and other more useful buildings like hospitals and schools.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

2006: A year in review

Today we are having a look back at the year gone by.

In February Nick Griffin was cleared of two charges and the jury could not come to a verdict on the other two charges. Later in the year he had another trial where he was cleared of all charges. It was a massive victory for free speech.

In February, the same month, it was found that 40% of Muslims want Sharia law introduced into Britain.

In the very same month John Prescott decided to destroy local democracy by banning councillors from voting if they had an opinion on the issue beforehand which means that councillors could not represent the views of their constituents.

In March we found that nursery rhymes are being rewritten so they won’t offend anyone. Thanks to that we are now going to sing baa baa rainbow sheep.Just 5 days later a mayoress was stripped of her position after joining the BNP. While BNP members were being attacked, suspected terrorists were able to tour around the houses of parliament as guests of Labour peers.But what can you expect when our own government goes ahead and saves the lives of terrorists that kill our soldiers in Iraq?

In April the Lords successfully got the Government to back down on making ID cards mandatory but the government decided you will have to pay for them anyway in their own sly little way. This happened on the same day as it emerged that more than half of the voters in this country want Blair out.

Lovely Mr Prescott thinking that we definitely need more housing came up with the bright idea of concreting over peoples backyards for more housing space. No wonder he wanted this to happen as it emerged that we are the biggest haven for asylum seekers in Europe.

In May the BNP made their long awaited breakthrough by doubling the amount of councillors that they had including getting a load elected on Barking and Dagenham council. These councillors were to prove a real asset as just two weeks later Barking council announced that they are going to build houses which will only be for local people. The treason continued though with our government giving free mobile phones to failed asylum seekers.

In June it emerged that multicultural communities were less trusting and less happy. This happened at around the same time that David Cameron said that improving people's happiness is a key challenge for politicians. I wonder if we were happy when a criminal got KFC to protect his human rights or I wonder if we were happy about the government giving their blessing to forced marriages? Maybe they are right about multicultural societies. You had to think that especially when it emerged that Muslim police are more corrupt and that the government were thinking about giving amnesty to half a million illegals.

In September it got even worse for local democracy when councillors were banned from voting on things not just if they held an opinion but if they owned something like a mobile phone and were voting on something like mobile phone masts. In the spirit of democracy 11 ‘anti-fascist’ campaigners targeted a teacher from Burton because he belonged to the BNP. In the spirit of freedom Muslims threatened violence in Australia after they were told to act civilised. In the very same month the MCB threatened Britain with terrorism. Threats weren’t too bad but Belgium received much worse when they had Ramadan riots.

The EU decided that it was time to change national boundaries and create trans-national regions. The EU also decided that workers could no longer decide how long they can work overtime.

In the same month the government gave 80,000 bogus asylum seekers amnesty to live here. The insanity continued when the government announced that they were going to fine cyclists £2500 for not having a bell. The country was getting weirder after the CBI announced that they were against large scale immigration which undermined wages while the unions were for it. Too bad the queen wasn’t thinking the same way as the CBI when she hired Eastern Europeans.

The insanity continued when it emerged that police could actually lose their jobs for chasing criminals. It didn’t stop there.A member of the BNP was found guilty of a racially aggravated offence despite the fact that a victim didn’t come forward and despite the fact the only witness wasn’t 100% sure of what was said. Of course the insanity continued. It reached it’s climax when the police decided to consult potential terrorists on the arrests of terrorists and when they decided the foreign prisoners that they didn’t deport were no longer a priority. No matter. Atleast the immigrants were taking priest jobs too. It’s just a pity teachers weren’t flooding in to take care of all the children that schools were too overwhelmed to take.

While our troops were fighting for freedom in foreign countries their families were banned from protesting in Manchester.In a further move against freedom it emerged that those constituencies that had not voted Labour would have their hospitals closed. Labour liked the feel of taking away our freedom so decided that serious crimes could be punished by £100 fines and no jail time and there would be no trial even if you were innocent.

It doesn’t matter if you’re Christian or not. In Bulwell you will be buried the Islamic way. Muslims felt the same with football when they decided that junior football should not be played during Ramadan because it might disadvantage their players.

September was a busy month for the idiots in government but October was the worst. Muslims were pissed after someone made a Mohammed bobblehead and the church decided that god might be a woman and shouldn’t be referred to as ‘he’ anymore.

In October Blair said that troops will get whatever they need but then we found out he was lying.He managed to slyly show that he wasn’t lying by renting helicopters off private companies. While Blair was lying through his teeth the head of the army was threatened with the sack after he told the truth.

Blair decided on an ingenious solution for dealing with the prisons crisis. He decided to let prisoners escape. Why they didn’t build more prisons is beyond me but maybe they wasted it paying for research into pockets. I don’t think they did because they managed to have enough money to pay prisoners to leave prisons. Blair was also releasing prisoners in droves and they were re-offending in droves.

It also emerged that diversity sucks after a scientific study found that diverse communities are the least trusting.

Common sense got a girl arrested after she asked to be moved into another group in her science lesson because she couldn’t speak their language or rather they couldn’t speak hers. We found out the police don’t have common sense when they decided to muzzle police dogs and make them head butt running criminals.

While the government were acting like clowns they were giving clowning lessons to refugees. While Eastern Europeans were undercutting Brits the government decided to stop anymore Africans from coming in even though Eastern Europeans were the bigger problem.

We found that Alqaeda was winning the battle of ideas with British Muslims but we decided to let more in anyway and the newspapers admitted that 50% of all victims of racial murders are white and most victims of racially motivated crime are white.In a similar story there was a victory for justice when the murderers of Kriss Donald were found guilty.In another victory for justice Nick Griffin and Mark Collette were found innocent on all charges.

Drug addicts in prison received a payout from the government because they were forced to stop taking drugs. This was while the government was banning smoking in public even though more than half of violent offenders just receive a caution. Police also decided they wanted to become just a little bit more fascist and ban people from causing offence. I don’t know why they would want to do that. Think of the paperwork involved.

While Mr Blair was lying to troops he was also charging them the privilege of risking their lives.

We found that Labour was acting corruptly when we found that council taxes were going into Labour party coffers.

This month despite MPs being incompetent they decided they want more money, £100,000 to be exact. They also decided to help migrants get more money by getting them to learn about all the different benefits that they can claim. While loads of people were entering it was found that 10% of Brits live overseas. Shock about immigration didn’t stop there. We found that 1 legal immigrant was entering this country every minute.

The EU was in the news again when they decided to close down a business even though their own court told them to re-open it.

The NHS decided to waste more money by giving people dancing lessons and trampolining lessons. People were getting angry at schools after it was found that they serve halal.

Remember the days when the BNP were called rightwing extremists? Well I do. A few months ago the media were even trying to associate the BNP with terrorism by calling our local groups ‘Active BNP cell’. Now those words are no longer working the media have ditched them and started to call us ‘the Left-fascist BNP’. We are apparently no longer rightwing but we are still fascist. When will they learn just because the term ‘rightwing fascist’ doesn’t work doesn’t mean the term ‘leftwing fascists’ will suddenly work either?

Just a few days ago I was a supposed rightwing fascist and now I am a leftwing fascist. We are still fascists though apparently. Maybe this reporter never read the guardian expose of the BNP? Maybe we should send him a copy?

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Regular readers will probably know by now what my position on the minimum wage is and how it should be calculated. For those who don’t you can read it Here.

This is how it should be:

There would be a new minimum wage for big business only. The minimum wage for big business would be different for each city and would be calculated like this:

Average weekly rent

Average weekly power bill

Average weekly food bill for family of 4

plus 25%

So you find what the weekly bills are (see above) plus 25% then divide it by 48 (which is the minimum hours people should work per week) and you have the minimum hourly wage.

The 25% bit would be for entertainment or putting some away in the bank.

The minimum wage for small business would be the national average or 15% lower than big business if the national average is bigger in that city than the city minimum wage.

After considering this quite a lot I find that I think this is basically a shitty policy. It needs more added to it. Why do I think it’s a shitty policy? Well for the fact that I developed it for the fact that I was thinking that everyone is a hard worker so they deserve the very minimum. The problem is not everyone is a hard worker and businesses are more likely to hire someone who has actually worked with a proven work ethic rather than someone who has shown no proven work ethic because they are just coming into the jobs market. My solution even has problems in itself one of which can be solved by stopping mass immigration.

My solution is for the minimum wage to only apply to those who have actually worked for one year in the same job. This way we know they have a good work ethic and are a hard worker because they managed to hold down a job for a year.

I see two problems with this:

1. Eastern Europeans and other immigrants have never actually worked in this country so they will cost even less which will drive employers to be even more likely to hire them so before we go with my solution we have to stop mass immigration.

2. Companies will like the idea of this too much and just start hiring those who have never worked and sack them after 11 months and then hire a new lot that have never worked. I don’t think a lot of companies will do this though because I think they would rather have employees that have shown that they are good at their job.

Even though there are problem with this it does have advantages because it will get companies to give those who have never had a job a chance to prove themselves. Personally if I was a manager and I had to choose between two candidates and I was only allowed to give them a set wage I would choose the guy with the experience but I may give the guy without experience a chance if I could give them a trial with a reduced wage.

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Government to do what I have been saying?

Smokers, people with alcohol problems and the obese could be denied priority treatment on the NHS if they do not try to change their lifestyle.

The Cabinet is discussing the controversial idea as part of a drive by Tony Blair to secure his domestic political legacy by pushing through a final round of public service reforms before he departs next year.

Is the government doing what I have been saying for years? I can’t tell whether they are or not. I don’t understand whether they are going to deny ALL healthcare to smokers or just the times when their illness is caused by them smoking which is what I think should happen. Knowing this government they will probably want to deny all healthcare.

Downing Street sources said no decisions had been taken on whether to change the guidelines and stressed that the public would be asked their views on the issue first.

You can tell they are lying. They never do what the people want.

Forest, the pro-smoking group, has claimed that some smokers have already suffered discrimination. It argues that tobacco revenues, which bring in £7bn a year for the Government, dwarf the cost of smoking-related illness.

I agree with Forest. I think we should lower the taxes on smoking and alcohol to just 5% above the European average. This way it will also be unprofitable to smuggle goods back to the UK if it actually did happen. We could then downsize Customs and Excise and save even more money. Those people could then work for the immigration taskforce which would be set up.

Why ration alcohol and ban it from being advertised? Why should the law abiding have to be punished? Why not have variable taxes on alcohol? Make it lower from Sunday-Thursday then triple the tax on it during Fridays and Saturdays when people go out binge drinking? Isn’t that a more sensible option?

Why parenting classes? Why not give parents back the right to smack their children? Wouldn’t that be much easier?

Why not pay countries like China and Russia to take 75% of our criminals? Basically the poorer and the less human rights those countries have the better. It will benefit both countries. We get somewhere else to put our prisoners cheaper and they get money to deal with them. They also get cheap labour. We also won’t have overcrowded prisons. It’s a win-win situation. They also get more jobs for the unemployed who can become prison officers. Are there any disadvantages to this?

The report also makes controversial observations about the lack of cohesion in British society: “There is concern about particular groups, eg Afro-Caribbean boys. More recently, there has been concern about Pakistani youths, who suffer disproportionately high unemployment, feel increasingly discriminated against, and disconnected from their parents.”

Ahhh… multiculturalism. Don’t ya just love it?

It says that illegal immigration “presents the greatest challenge for cohesion . . . with clandestine entrants (eg on the back of a lorry) presenting greater challenges than overstayers.”

And yet Blair will do fuck all about it.

To defuse social tensions, the report suggests that Muslim women teachers should be banned from covering their faces with the niqab veil in the classroom and that the government “may make it clear that wearing a veil in public has potential consequences on cohesion”.

Normal people have been saying this for years but only now are we getting listened to.

You can do so by emailing news@channel4.com and telling them in 100 words or less why you have chosen Nick Griffin.

I have put ‘I nominate Nick Griffin for Most Inspiring Political Figure of 2006 for his fantastic work in promoting the cause of freedom and spreading the truth about Islam’. Short and sweet. You can do it too. At the moment we are nominating people to be on the vote so every nomination counts.

The Guardian has another two stories about how their mole infiltrated the BNP and found… well nothing! They are spending quite a lot of time on this none story even though they didn’t find anything significant but never mind. They infiltrated the party for 12 months so we have to give them a bone seeing as how they must be seriously pissed as wasting all that time and money and coming up with nothing.

I will put snippets in this blog but a lot of it has already been said yesterday so just look at yesterday and you will find most stuff.

Here it is:

The British National party believes its efforts to sanitise its public image have brought it to the brink of an electoral breakthrough, according to unpublished documents and tapes uncovered by the Guardian.

The clean-up, ordered by the leader, Nick Griffin, to rid the party of its hooligan stereotype is, according to the documents, aimed at legitimising the BNP in the eyes of a wider electorate.

Party leaders believe they can double the number of BNP councillors, gain a foothold on the Greater London Assembly and make a serious tilt at a small number of especially vulnerable parliamentary constituencies.

Well kudos to you for finding what we have been saying for ages. Who knew we think that we can double our councillors and get elected to parliament and the London Assembly? Unless you live under a rock I think everyone knew this.

The party's support is largely confined to a handful of small areas,

I thought you said yesterday we have lots of company directors and other middle class people? How is that confined? Please explain.

That first article of today wasn’t very enlightening. Why don’t we look at the second article here.

Yet despite the seven years of repackaging, it is impossible to miss the racism. Xenophobia oozes from every pronouncement of the party and its leaders, on paper, on the internet and in person.

LOL! Just yesterday you said “In my seven months as a party member I heard very few racist epithets, and no anti-semitic comments.” Where did you hear these racist comments in the last 24 hours? If we are racist why did you hear very few racist epithets while you were a member for more than a year and organiser for 7 months?

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Should sluts be given abortions?

More than a hundred teenage girls a month go into a hospital or clinic to have an abortion for the second time, figures from the Department of Health reveal. They include at least one girl under 18 who has had at least six abortions.

The statistics on multiple abortions in England and Wales, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, will provide fuel for those demanding stricter abortion laws.

They reveal that during 2005, 1,316 girls under 18 had their second abortion, and 90 were on their third.

There were 44 women who, by the end of last year, had undergone eight or more abortions, 20 of whom were under the age of 30.

The table, posted on the Department of Health website, obscures information on women under 30 who have had multiple abortions, to avoid the risk that a small number of teenagers could be identified. But it can be deduced from the tables that 14 women had had their sixth abortion before the age of 25, and that at least one was under 18.

Those who work directly with pregnant teenagers blamed the figures on poor sex education. Simon Blake, the chief executive of the charity Brook, which offers free sex advice to the young, said: "The small number of young women who need to have two or three abortions before they reach the age of 18 have clearly been failed by our education and health systems."

Do you know anything Simon Blake? If after their first abortion these sluts don’t know how not to get pregnant then education wouldn’t work anyway (what’s better than learning from your mistakes?). I can accept 1 mistake but not 6!

This is the reason that if abortion is going to be legal then people should pay for it themselves and should cough up the cash before they get it.If you don’t want to get pregnant you should be either wearing protection or you should not be having sex at all.

It seems as if The Guardian newspaper is on our side. Well not really but they do give us a bit of good publicity and accidentally demolishes the myth that we are all poor knuckle dragging Nazis who want to see a bit more cooking of the average Jew. You can read their recruitment campaign for the BNP here.

While you’re on my blog I will give you a chance to read some of it:

Guardian reporter Ian Cobain joined the BNP and became central London organiser. He found:

Activists are being encouraged to adopt false names when engaged on BNP business, to reduce the chance of their being identified as party members in their other dealings with the public.

Wow. So he lied about being a nationalist and he was so good at lying he became organiser. Congratulations.

We have middle class members? Just a few weeks ago we were all poor uneducated racists. Yes I know we have middle class members. Two of the members of the Teesside committee are teachers.

I don’t know about London but we don’t have false identities when we are out leafleting or doing official business. If they have false names in London why is that a bad thing? BNPers using their real names would probably be fired from their job for using their democratic right to join a party.

A covert rule book? Ok what has it got in it?

The BNP has also been instructing its activists in the use of encryption software to conceal the content of their email messages, and to protect the party's secret membership lists.

That’s what BNP emails are for so outside people cannot see official BNP business. Why shouldn’t the BNP protect their membership lists? Shock horror! They are complying with the Data Protection Act something which The Guardian is not.

Party members are also employing counter-surveillance techniques, including the routine use of rendezvous points at which they will gather before being redirected to clandestine meetings.

Yes we do this. This is common knowledge so we don’t get leftwingers showing and trying to fight us. We just want a peaceful meeting. What’s wrong with that? Left-wingers do show up. Don’t think they don’t. I was once sent to a redirection point when Nick Griffin was going to come (he cancelled in the end). The leftwingers showed up, about 30 of them all chanting ‘black and white unite and fight. Bash the BNP’. When I found where the real meeting was I calmly walked out of the pub, stood over the road for a few minutes watching the demonstration which was a risk considering some of the demonstrators were in my college, one of which was in one of my classes. I waited 10 minutes then walked to the real meeting.

BNP activists are also now discouraged from using any racist or anti-semitic language in public, in order to avoid possible prosecution. In a BNP rulebook, issued only to activists and organisers, they are instructed that they should avoid acting in a way which fits stereotypes of the far right, and "act only in a way that reflects credit on the Party".

Wow! So members of the BNP are told not to be racist or anti-Semitic? I thought they were all racists?

In an attempt to achieve the degree of political legitimacy which it believes it needs to win more votes, the extreme rightwing party is attempting to establish itself in affluent areas of the capital such as Belgravia, Chelsea and Knightsbridge.

The BNP already has significant numbers of members living in those areas. They include Peter Bradbury, a leading proponent of complementary medicine who has links to Prince Charles, Richard Highton, a healthcare regulator, and Simone Clarke, principal dancer with the English National Ballet.

There are also dozens of company directors, computing entrepreneurs, bankers and estate agents among the 200 members and lapsed members living in central London. One member is a servant of the Queen residing at BuckinghamPalace, while a number are former Conservative party activists.

So the BNP actually do have well educated middle class members. Who knew? Well just about everyone but let’s give the reporter a cookie for finding it out. You are also forgetting about the authors we have in the BNP but never mind. Atleast the nation now knows we have good members including members with links to the Royal family.

The reporter seemed to fool the BNP members who he talked to a lot. Here is his own account of what happened:

Basically he starts chatting to someone called Steve who was his first contact inside the BNP. Here is what Steve said to him:

"The whole world is pouring down on us," he said. "It's a huge problem, and it's going to get worse." Not that he is a racist, you understand - "I'm on the liberal wing of the party ... most of the people in the party are" - and he doesn't blame the immigrants themselves - "if I was a 19-year-old Kurd, I'd be trying to get into the country"

That’s what I have been saying. I don’t blame the immigrants and neither do the BNP.So how is this supposed to show us in a bad light Guardian man? If anything it shows us in a positive light.

In my seven months as a party member I heard very few racist epithets, and no anti-semitic comments.

Really? I thought we were racist Nazis who loved cooking the Jews for the summer barbecue?

Shortly after this, Sadie Graham, the BNP's Group Development Officer, writes from Nottingham to thank me for becoming the central London organiser and to offer advice. This includes the suggestion that I contact my "regional security officer" before holding any meetings.

The following week I receive an email with an encrypted attachment. Using the software from Nick, I open up the attachment to find it is an Excel spreadsheet listing 192 current and lapsed members living in the three central London boroughs, plus the north London boroughs of Camden and Islington. I am also sent a second list of people who have joined in the previous few months, or expressed an interest in joining.

They include dozens of company directors, computing entrepreneurs, bankers and estate agents, and a handful of teachers. One member is a former Miss England, another is the American chief executive of a City investment corporation, while one is a servant of the Queen, living at BuckinghamPalace.

Who would have though we would have a former Miss England? It seems they are mentioning the well educated again. Are they deliberately trying to make us look better? It seems that way to me.

Thanks to The Guardian, they have only confirmed why I joined the BNP and why I will continue to support them. I am even going to email The Guardian thanking them for their hard work helping me to confirm why I support the BNP. You can do it too. Email them and thank them for all their hard work at their email address which is politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Another reason to ban Muslim dress

A man who was being hunted for the murder of a policewoman is understood to have escaped from Britain by disguising himself as a veiled Muslim woman.

Mustaf Jama, a prime suspect in the fatal shooting of PC Sharon Beshenivsky, assumed his sister’s identity — wearing the niqab and using her passport — to evade supposedly stringent checks at Heathrow, according to police sources.

The use of the niqab, which leaves only a narrow slit for the eyes, highlights flaws in British airport security. At the time, Jama was Britain’s most wanted man, while Heathrow was on a heightened state of alert after the 7/7 terrorist atrocities in London five months previously.

The Times has learnt that British immigration officers rarely carry out a visual check to match a passport photograph with a departing female passenger’s veiled face.

Why isn’t anyone wearing one of those tents ever checked?Anyone could be entering or leaving the country and we don’t know if they are who they say they are on their passport photo. Even taking them aside and getting a woman to check would be an adequate security measure.

Will the sister be arrested for aiding and abetting a criminal? I hope so. I don’t think it will happen though.

Monday, December 18, 2006

Shock! Romanians might have to act civilised!

The deep howl brought neighbours scurrying into the Margarit family's back yard. Four men held down Ghita the pig, her trotters were tied up with wire, and George Margarit plunged a knife into her throat.

As the thick steaming blood spilled out on to the ground and her cries and shudders continued long after she had breathed her last, Vasilica Margarit poured out hot home-made tuica or plum brandy for the visitors. "This is the last time we'll be able to do this," she said.

They have been informed in writing by the local mayor that when Romania joins the EU such practices will have to stop. They will be required to kill their pigs more humanely by electrocution, shooting or tranquillisers, watched over by a local inspector.

The residents of the village of Vidra, 12 miles south of Bucharest, are not happy about the regulation. Neither are they pleased about a raft of others which will revolutionise the lives and traditions of the self-sufficient millions who earn their living from the land.

"I thought when we joined the EU we'd get lots of benefits and freedom," said Mr Margarit, 40, a railway worker. "But what does freedom mean if I can't slaughter my own pig in my back yard?"

He also cited the taxes which are to be placed on those who produce their own plum brandy with a volume of more than 50 per cent (most producers), and the rule which will mean corpses will no longer be allowed to be kept at home for three days after death, as is the custom, but will have to be moved to the local church.

The estimated three million-strong Roma community meanwhile, are upset at being told that their tradition of under-age arranged marriages will have to stop.

Yeah whatever next? They might even stop you from beating your wives. We can’t have that can we?

This is what we will be importing when Romania enters the EU. We already have them here. You might have seen them committing cash machine crime seeing as 85% of cash machine crimes are committed by Romanians even though they aren’t in the EU.

Ahhhhh…… don’t ya just love multiculturalism. This is what you get when you import people from inferior cultures in inferior lands. The only way to stop it is get out of the EU.

Billions of pounds in public money have been systematically channelled to Labour strongholds over the past decade, detailed research reveals.

Some of the startling findings of the research include:

• More than 90 per cent of social security jobs relocated from London have gone to Labour constituencies.

• National Lottery grants to constituencies represented by members of the Cabinet are nearly double those to seats held by the Shadow Cabinet.

• More than 70 per cent of community hospitals earmarked for closure are in Tory seats.

• More than 70 per cent of new hospitals being built are in Labour seats.

• Police forces in Labour-controlled areas top the funding league, while those in opposition areas come bottom.

• Post office cuts and rail station closures are overwhelmingly in opposition seats.

Blair is basically saying “vote for us or suffer”. They couldn’t care less about Britain. All they care about is votes and staying in power to inflict more damage to Britain. If you care more about this country than yourself you should NEVER vote Labour. They have shown time and time again what a corrupt lot of lying twats they are.

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Britons to be punished for not being slaves

Work-shy Britons are in danger of losing out to a new wave of industrious eastern European immigrants over jobs, a cabinet minister will warn this week as he launches a controversial review of benefits.

John Hutton, the Work and Pensions Secretary, will argue that, with 600,000 vacancies nationwide, there should be jobs for most of those who want them. And he will say that a 'can work, won't work' minority who refuse to take up opportunities will be targeted in the review, which could lead to tougher sanctions against those judged not to be co-operating with efforts to find employment.

Hutton's attack follows complaints from a number of Labour MPs that the influx of eastern Europeans following EU expansion two years ago has undercut wages and cost jobs among British-born workers, particularly in industries such as construction, where Polish plumbers and carpenters have proved both cheap and popular with householders.

Maybe there wouldn’t be so many unemployed if immigrants weren’t undercutting wages so much. Brits shouldn’t be made to work as slaves just so the rich can get richer. If you want them to get back to work you send ALL immigrants back which will allow Brits to work for a fair wage and not the crappy wages that are being offered now.

After you have got rid of the immigrants then you can penalise the work shy because then they will actually be work shy. Start with giving unemployment benefit to those people that have worked for atleast 2 years then by giving them a time limit on unemployment benefit for 3 months. Once the three months are up do not give them financial benefits. Give them tokens for food and other necessities. If you want luxuries you should have to work. Having to pay for things in tokens will shame people into getting a job as it will be embarrassing having to pay with tokens. If they haven’t found a job within another 6 months the government should find them 4 different jobs to pick from. If they decline all of them their benefits will be stopped and if they want to eat they should have to work for it. I don’t see why the state should provide for you when you are unwilling to provide for yourself. It might harm their children if they have any but children that have parents that cannot take care of them (provide food and other necessities) should be taken into care and given food and other necessities.

Labour has no chance of winning the next Election because voters think the Government is a shambles - and there is little Gordon Brown can do to stop David Cameron becoming Prime Minister.

That is the devastating verdict of a secret Downing Street memo drawn up for Tony Blair by his senior advisers and obtained by The Mail on Sunday.

The confidential document states:

- Labour's standing is so low that the party's only hope of recovering may be to abandon Mr Brown and 'move to a new generation' by picking a much younger new leader - though it warns of the perils of being 'disloyal' to the 'greatly respected' Chancellor.

- The public believes the party is riven by 'internal conflicts' and shows a 'lack of grip and competence on key issues' such as Iraq, the NHS and immigration.

Well I am glad it’s not just me that can see that Labour have made a total balls-up of the country. On every issue that affects Britain I cannot see what they have succeeded at except for destroying Britain. Seriously, what have Labour made any better?

Friday, December 15, 2006

Legalise brothels

Most of you will have heard about the killing of 5 prostitutes in Ipswich by now. It is despicable that someone would murder people just because they are prostitutes. I think something needs. I think brothels should be legalised but only the local council should be able to run them and they should be built in unpopulated areas so they don’t disturb the residents that live near there.

Prostitutes are only trying to earn a living, some to support their drug habit, others because they can’t survive on benefits especially when they have children. Prostitutes should not be vilified. They are a victim as much as anyone. They should be given a safe place to do their business where they aren’t beaten or killed because they are a prostitute.

I think the council should run brothels for many reasons, for one they are less likely to be treated as slaves and it removes the influence of the pimps whose only real source of income is from being a total parasite. If the pimps don’t have any influence the prostitutes will be safer, though not completely safe.

Let’s be clear. Most prostitutes will probably want out of the business but they can’t get out because they are addicted to drugs or have other problems like not having any skills. We have dealt with the pimps. Now let’s deal with the drugs. With the brothel a drugs rehab clinic should be built for those who volunteer to get off drugs. They shouldn’t be forced off them. The process of getting off the drugs should start with them and the only part that we should play is helping them get off the drugs.

The second part is helping them get skills so they can do more with their lives. One day a week they should be required to attend college where they will be taught a new skill or attend a local business that is prepared to give them an apprenticeship. This could be anything from hair styling and cookery (chef) to plumbing.

They want to get out of the business. We should give them that chance, not by punishing them but helping them improve themselves and helping them get off drugs.

Nothing much would change for the prostitutes either. The local council would merely be providing the security. The prostitutes could set their own rate and their own hours that they work.

This will not just be beneficial to the prostitutes but it will also be good for the police. It would free up police resources to deal with more important crimes like child prostitution and drug dealing. Far too much time is wasted on adult prostitution where the police should be arresting the pimps of child prostitutes.

With a crackdown on drugs the prostitutes that are on drugs will have no choice but to go to the drugs rehab clinic and get clean. With more resources to deal with paedophile rings there would be more children being freed from sexual slavery of disgusting perverts who should be lynched.

Critics of this say that it would cost the council hundreds of thousands of pounds per year to run and they are right of course but the prostitutes themselves should share the bill. They are taking advantage of the safety of the brothel so it is only right that they should pay a contribution towards it. So if they are 50 prostitutes per day and it costs £1000 per day to run they should each contribute £20 per day. There could also be a entry charge for those wanting sex of a couple of pounds. The brothel should aim to break even but if they do make a profit I don’t see why the local council can’t buy blankets just before winter starts and hand them out to the elderly so they don’t freeze to death. Sadly local councils can’t do much for the elderly like giving them heating allowances.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Twas the night before christmas

'Twas The (Politically Correct) Night Before Christmas:'Twas the night before Christmas and Santa's a wreck...How to live in a world that's politically correct?His workers no longer would answer to "Elves"."Vertically Challenged" they were calling themselves.And labor conditions at the north poleWere alleged by the union to stifle the soul.Four reindeer had vanished, without much propriety,Released to the wilds by the Humane Society.And equal employment had made it quite clearThat Santa had better not use just reindeer.

So Dancer and Donner, Comet and Cupid,Were replaced with 4 pigs, and you know that looked stupid!

The runners had been removed from his sleigh;The ruts were termed dangerous by the E.P.A.And people had started to call for the copsWhen they heard sled noises on their roof-tops.

Second-hand smoke from his pipe had his workers quite frightened.His fur trimmed red suit was called "Unenlightened."

And to show you the strangeness of life's ebbs and flows,Rudolf was suing over unauthorized use of his noseAnd had gone on Geraldo, in front of the nation,Demanding millions in over-due compensation.

So, half of the reindeer were gone; and his wife,Who suddenly said she'd enough of this life,Joined a self-help group, packed, and left in a whiz,Demanding from now on her title was Ms.

And as for the gifts, why, he'd ne'er had a notionThat making a choice could cause so much commotion.Nothing of leather, nothing of fur,Which meant nothing for him. And nothing for her.

Nothing that might be construed to pollute.Nothing to aim. Nothing to shoot.Nothing that clamored or made lots of noise.Nothing for just girls. Or just for the boys.

Nothing that claimed to be gender specific.Nothing that's warlike or non-pacific.

No candy or sweets...they were bad for the tooth.Nothing that seemed to embellish a truth.And fairy tales, while not yet forbidden,Were like Ken and Barbie, better off hidden.

For they raised the hackles of those psychologicalWho claimed the only good gift was one ecological.

No baseball, no football...someone could get hurt;Besides, playing sports exposed kids to dirt.Dolls were said to be sexist, and should be passe;And Nintendo would rot your entire brain away.

So Santa just stood there, disheveled, perplexed;He just could not figure out what to do next.

He tried to be merry, tried to be gay,you've got to be careful with that word today.His sack was quite empty, limp to the ground;Nothing fully acceptable was to be found.

Something special was needed, a gift that he mightGive to all without angering the left or the right.A gift that would satisfy, with no indecision,Each group of people, every religion;

Every ethnicity, every hue,Everyone, everywhere...even you.So here is that gift, it's price beyond worth..."May you and your loved ones enjoy peace on earth."

Notice: This poem is copyright 1992 by Harvey Ehrlich. It is free todistribute, without changes, as long as this notice remains intact. Allfollow-ups, requests, comments, questions, distribution rights, etc shouldbe made to mduhan@husc.harvard.edu . Happy Holidays!

ONE OF Scotland’s most prominent Muslims has compared the treatment of Asians in Britain with that of Jews in Nazi Germany.

Osama Saeed, Scottish spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain and a former Scottish National party candidate, said the growing number of attacks on Muslims echoed the state-sponsored persecution of Jews in pre-war Germany.

Yeah Mr Saeed I can so see the similarities. While Muslims call for the beheading of those who insult Islam in 1945 the Hanzar Division of Muslim the Nazi Waffen SS were probably beheading jews. Wait… I’m beginning to see the similarities now.

While Jews were denied the right to leisure facilities like swimming baths Muslims get their own day where none-Muslims aren’t allowed.

I would go on but I think you get the picture and Stargate is about to start. You can rest assured that this man is an idiot.

A Londoncouncil has gone insane and decided that they don’t need baths and no they are not the great unwashed, well maybe they are as they are a Conservative run council.

It’s all to combat climate change you see. Despite the fact that the UN has just recently downgraded mans’ contribution to climate change by 25% and it is despite the fact that the UN has shown that cows are the greatest threat to climate, forests and wildlife, even more so than cars.

The climate change hobbyists, those that make it a hobby to get on the bandwagon of blaming human must realise that humans cannot change what it happening. Most of what is causing global warming is not human related. Now Gordon Brown can drop his green taxes because they won’t stop anything. Infact if he seriously wanted to stop global warming he would put a tax on cows… oops shouldn’t have said that, he might actually do it.

Monday, December 11, 2006

One step closer to recognising Somaliland?

Remember Somaliland, the breakaway republic from Somalia who I have been hoping will be recognised as an independent state? Well they are one step closer to being recognised as an independent state. The World Bank has agreed to assist the Somaliland civil servant workforce in developing their skills. This may mean that soon they will be recognised as an independent state.

Also the UK ambassador to Ethiopia had a meeting with the Somaliland president. The Ambassador’s meeting with the Somaliland President on Wednesday discussed the current affairs of the Region, as well as how Britain will best assist Somaliland in development programs.

In a statement by the Somaliland presidential spokesman Abdi Idiris, the president requested from the Ambassador for his government to recognize Somaliland as an independent state and said that the region’s security and stability will greatly be enhanced if International community recognizes Somaliland’s Sovereignty. On his side the Ambassador, praised Somaliland’s democracy and its role in the peace building of the region [Horn of Africa] and said that his government will do everything it can to make sure peace in the region prevails.