close issue-63: we'll specifying rdf:HTML by deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed. link

to resolve ISSUE-118 according to Pat's proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013May/0014.html [17:55] <cgreer> hahah link

15:39:34 <sandro> PROPOSAL: we're specifying rdf:HTML deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed.

PROPOSED: we're specifying rdf:HTML deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed.←

15:39:54 <cgreer> sandro: This is so complex .. the basic idea has been stable, but little bits keep changing

Sandro Hawke: This is so complex .. the basic idea has been stable, but little bits keep changing←

15:51:34 <sandro> PROPOSAL: we'll specifying rdf:HTML by deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed.

PROPOSED: we'll specifying rdf:HTML by deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed.←

15:53:31 <sandro> RESOLVED: close issue-63: we'll specifying rdf:HTML by deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed.

RESOLVED: close ISSUE-63: we'll specifying rdf:HTML by deferring the semantics (lexical-to-value mapping) to whatever is latest/greatest HTML standard. This only comes up for people trying to do D-Entailment on rdf:HTML literals --- determining equality of value, and checking for ill-typed.←

15:53:53 <sandro> (or it was already closed, but tag this as related to issue-63)