Saturday, January 31, 2015

It is described as the religion of peace, just
where is there peace in Islam?

Hello!
Maybe you didn’t hear my question. WHERE IS THERE
PEACE IN

ISLAM??? Where?

By de
Andréa

January 31, 2015

One need look no further than one’s own front yard to understand
that Islam is the ideology of hate, murder, mayhem and misery. Bloody beheadings in Florida and Oklahoma and
attacks and bombings all over America are just the beginning, it will get worse
my friend, much worse. Moreover, as long
as there are Muslims, it will never stop.

U.S. counterterrorism officials reported that Boko-Haramutilized strategically and placed IED’s and firing
squads to slaughter the majority of the town’s residents. And those that
weren’t killed by these insidious tactics were tortured, raped, incinerated and
or beheaded. The religion of peace indeed!

After viewing
pictures of the bloodlust of these so-called peaceful Muslims and the carnage
of murder–there is no denying that Islam is anything but peaceful, it is in
fact, the IDEOLOFY FROM HELL. And yet we still blindly call it the “Religion of Peace”.

What in the *#@&^* is the matter with us. We must
have a death wish in the West.

Let’s face it– the reality is, that no matter where Muslims
reside – hate, the carnage of murder, mayhem and misery always follow.

The Philippines

There is a report coming from The Philippinesthat 49 members of an elite police unit were killed early
Sunday while attempting to enter an Islamic NO GO zone to arrest suspectedterrorists.

This woman (who
was begging for her life) wasn’t even afforded an ounce of due process because under Islamic Sharia law–women are nothing more than vermin.

All this, while
our Muslim presidentpals around with the new king of Saudi Arabia and at the same time
he shuns the leader of Israel Netanyahu.
Well…one shouldn’t expect anything else from Obama, Muslims just hate
Jews. Moreover, Obama also had no time
to join the leaders of 57 other countries in France after the attack on Charlie
Hebdo and the Jewish restaurant by
his fellowMuslim terrorist jihadists.

Of course,
Islam’s vile footprint isn’t limited to third-world countries and desert
fiefdoms. Sadly, Western Civilization has felt the wrath of this archaic and
vile ideology from Hell, and still we are willfully blind to the truth of Islam.
We are enabling the diggers of our own graves.

Europe

Lest we forget
the thousands of innocent children who have been raped by Muslim so-called “grooming gangs”throughout
Europe simply because under Sharia law they are considered to be “infidel
sluts.”

Not to mention
the plethora of “no-go” zones that vitiate the European landscape from the UK to
Sweden. These zones are breeding grounds for terrorists and other Islamo-thugs
to hatch their machinations like the one executed in France against Charlie
Hebdo.

America

But we don’t
have those NO-GO ZONEShere in the
U.S. Right! Wrong…as I said “Let’s face it–no matter where Muslims reside
– hate, the carnage of murder, mayhem and misery always follow.”Take a look at the NO – GO ZONES in Dearborn Michigan. Yes that’s a city in the state of Michigan,
one of the 50 or so states right here in the U.S.. I telling you this just in
case you attended one of the Nazi/Islamic anti-American government so called
public schools of robotic programming and politically correct indoctrination.

And while we
take the Ten Commandments out of our court rooms we have allowed Sharia law to
take the place of U.S. law. Look at Sharia in a Texas court. More on that tomorrow.

THE BOTTOM LINE:The murder, mayhem and misery of
this so-called “Peaceful Nation Of Islam” is rapidly taking root and proliferating
on our home turf just as it has in every country in the world, and it will
continue to get worse unless we elect a president
who is not a Muslim Jihadist for a CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE, and one who respects Constitutional Law
rather than Sharia Law (particularly free speech and the right to bear arms “for
the security of a free State” that Obama doesn’t want,)–but who also
recognizes Islam for the evil barbaric refuse from Hell that it truly is.

And just for
the record…I don’t hate Muslims, I hate h ideology of Islam. And furthermore,
as some of you have been writing back to me… I am not a racists. Just
for the purpose of your education, Islam is not a race of people, most but not
all are Arabs, and I have nothing at all against Arabs, and not all Arabs are
Muslins some are more Christian than you.
Moreover, Islam is not a religion of peace or anything else. It is an Ideology
like Nazism, only on steroids, bent on taking control of the entire world,
using terror, infiltration, coercion, intimidation, murder or any other means
available.

That’s what
Islamic Jihad is’ my friend… Read the Quran and the Hadith’s, it’s in there.

Thanks
for listening – de Andréa

If you agree
please pass this article on to everyone on your email list. may be the
only chance for them to hear the truth.

So what is the real
truth and what is Lynch’s position on Islamic jihad and its religious
underpinnings? In the 2012 terror plot to bomb New York’s JFK
Airport, Lynch, as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District, weighed in on the
sentencing of 66-year-old co-conspirator Kareem Ibrahim, who was
given a life sentence. According to the Associated Press (via the Seattle Times.

Lynch said in a
statement that “Ibrahim, a Shiite imam from Trinidad, “abandoned the true
tenants of his religion’ by participating in the plot.” In 2007 Lynch was already making excuses and
covering up what Kareem Ibrahim attempted
to do at Kennedy Airport in NY. Worse
than that she lied as Obama lied when he said “ISIL
is not Islamic” covering up the true agenda of
Islam. And why is Obama and members of
his regime the
only ones to identify the IS as ISIL?
Because he is a Muslim and hates Jews, the reference to ISIL supports
that.

As Robert Spencer (An
expert on the history and ideology of Islam) grimly quips at Jihad Watch:

“Yes, I am sure that
Loretta Lynch knows so much more about the true “tenants” of Islam than does a
66-year-old Shi’ite imam.”

Lynch’s defense of
Islam’s true nature are compatible with those of the president and members of
his regime, who have said variously:

·

·” Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL
is not “Islamic.”No
religion condones the killing of innocents…Said Barack Obama

Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch belonged to a student group that
brought Jew-hating Palestinian terrorists to Harvard Law School every year she
was a member. Lynch belonged to the
Harvard Black Law Students Association (BLSA) from 1981-1984 when she was a
student.

During those years the radical black group
brought representatives from the Palestinian Liberation Operation (PLO).

The group’s leader, Mohammed Kenyatta,
called for the “liberation of Palestine” and expressed support for the
terrorist organization. The BLSA
defended bringing the terrorists ina
letter to the editor of the Harvard student newspaper, The Harvard
Crimson.

The Black Law Students
Association (BALSA) committed an unjustifiable and discriminatory
violation of student liberties last week when it denied Jewish students an
opportunity to participate in a campus forum featuring a representative of the
Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).

More than 30 Jewish Law Students Association
(JLSA) members attended the panel discussion, outnumbering members of BALSA and
the Third World Coalition, the event’s sponsors. But after opening the forum to
questions from the floor, BALSA moderator Muhammad I. Kenyatta refused to
recognize any of the white hands raised in the audience. BALSA and TWC members
were to be given priority, he announced, proceeding to call on a Black student
who hadn’t raised his hand.

We defend the PLO’s right to appear in an
open forum at Harvard. All groups have a right to present their views; had
Kenyatta permitted all students to challenge the speaker with critical
questions, the ensuing discussion might have provided a constructive exchange
of ideas and opinions.

By stifling debate, however, Kenyatta
reduced the event to little more than a propaganda platform for a terrorist
organization that has pledged to destroy the State of Israel. His refusal to
open the floor to all students’ views showed a glaring disregard for the
principles of free discussion that are vital to an enlightened academic
community.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Will the GOP Put Holder on Trial?

Well maybe, kind’a, sort of!

By de Andréa
January 29, 2015

I believe the GOP lawmakers just may use yesterday and again
today’s examination of Loretta Lynch, the federal prosecutor picked by
President Obama to replace Holder as attorney general, to air long-standing
grievances with the Obama administration.

They’ve long seen Holder and Obama as skirting the law on
hot-button issues such as immigration, counterterrorism, tax enforcement and
drug policies. Moreover, the president’s
frequent use of executive action and regulation has drawn accusations that he’s
exceeding his authority under the Constitution.

“I think there’s an erosion of confidence in the Department of
Justice on the fundamental question of whether the attorney general politicizes
the office,”
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said Tuesday. “We need an attorney general that won’t
politicize the office.”

But
while GOP lawmakers are relishing the opportunity to sink their teeth into
Holder’s record, they also concede Lynch — barring any misstep — is likely to
be confirmed. Her reputation as being
tough on crime has won praise from both sides of the aisle, with Fox News Host
Bill O’Reilly calling her a “hero” last week, leaving the White House confident
she’ll win over the Senate.

While
Lynch’s nomination appears assured, as Democrats need only a handful of
Republicans to cross the aisle and support her nomination, she still might have
trouble staying out of the partisan crossfire at her confirmation hearing.

“The Justice Department is a big mess,” said Judiciary Chairman Chuck
Grassley (R-Iowa), “and we want to know how she’s going to straighten out the
department.”

One
of the biggest points of contention will undoubtedly be immigration on the
heels of the president’s announcement late last year that he would use
prosecutorial discretion to defer deportation for up to 5 million illegal
immigrants.

Sessions,
who also sits on the panel, has been among the Senate’s most outspoken opponents
of the president’s executive action. And Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said he’d
judge her qualifications for the job based on how she responded to questions
about the president’s immigration plan.

Another
Judiciary panel member, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said he had two things he
wanted Lynch to address: his push for the DOJ to target Internet gambling more
aggressively and his concern over efforts to close the prison at Guantanamo
Bay.

The
committee has invited former CBS News reporter Sheryl Attkisson, who
investigated the Justice Department’s “Fast and Furious” gunrunning program, to
appear before the panel. Congress held Holder in contempt for withholding
documents from a House panel investigating the program.

After
leaving CBS to join the Heritage Foundation, Attkisson filed a $35 million
lawsuit against Holder accusing the federal government of spying on her.

Questions
about the Justice Department’s treatment of journalists will be amplified by
another witness, Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University professor
known for having called for Holder’s resignation over the government’s seizure
of phone records belonging to The Associated Press.

“I bet every one of the 10 [Republican] senators will have a
question about executive action,” Grassley said.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your
email list. It may be the only chance
for them to hear the truth.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Have you ever had one of those, “I told you so” moments? Where you warned, and you predicted. But
no matter how well you reasoned, no one seemed to listen. You could tell as you
talked, the person was not listening. They were just bent on doing what they
wanted because it seemed they were so blind and deceived that they couldn’t
hear you or see the truth.

Then,
the things you said and then some, all came to pass. Well, here it is, welcome
to the slippery-slope of perversion that you voted for my friend.

But
quite honestly, I didn’t see this ‘specific one’ coming. Gay marriage, Transgender marriage, marriage
between a man and his dog, but marrying one’s own child, no, I didn’t think we
could become so depraved and perverted.

An unnamed 18 year old girl from New York announced that
she was set to marry her biological father. In an interview with New York
Magazine, she said that “they were in love and that they were
planning to have children”.

The girl and her father were
estranged for 12 years. According to reports, she was conceived on prom night
when her parents were just 18. That the parents could not make it work and the
father was not in her life. The girl’s mother has been in and out of
relationships with men the girl’s entire life. She always felt that there was a
void of fatherly affection. Until, one day, the father reached out to the girl
on Facebook. This led to the girl
spending a week with her father.

She
recalls what happened:“[W]e
didn’t know what was going on, but admitted that we had strong feelings for
each other,” she told the publication. “We discussed whether it was wrong and
then we kissed. And then we made out, and then we made love for the first time.
That was when I lost my virginity.”

Clearly this girl is confused, she confessed
to a lesbian relationship in high school, and then a relationship with a young
man. She was restricted from seeing the young man because her mother was
concerned that the relationship was getting too serious.

Christian news reported: “She
also had a relationship with a teenage boy, but when her mother felt that
matters were becoming inappropriate, she pulled her out of school and
homeschooled her for a time.”

Fox News quotes her: “Everyone
on my mom’s side of the family sees us as father and daughter,” she told the
magazine. “Those who know that he’s my dad, and that we are engaged, include my
father’s parents (they can see we are happy together and they can’t wait for us
to have babies — they treat us just like any other couple), the woman we live
with, and my best friend.”

THE BOTTOM LINE:There are two points to be seen in
this situation. First is the fact that if you allow one abomination the next is
right behind. As many, including me, who oppose homosexual marriages have
stated, if we allow this, what is next? Where does it lead? If you allow misguided
love to determine what is moral, all is allowed. “It feels good so it must be
okay.”

The situation also points to the fact
that children need good and strong male figures in their lives. This is a
lesson in the nature that God created. Two parents, a mom and a dad. This girl would
not be confusing love for sex if she had a constant, safe, and proper affection
of a father. She would not think that sex is the only way that a man shows a
woman affection. This confusion occurs when there is the absence of proper male
affection in a young girl’s life before puberty.

And then this pervert took advantage of
his own absence to molest his vulnerable child. This is no different than child
molestation and incest, and there should be an investigation.

We allowed the Pandora’s Box to be
opened:

If
you thought that gay marriage was the end, yes you were mistaken. I believe, we
have only seen the beginning. This, my friend, is going to be a long descent
into the depravity of Hell. We are truly on the slippery slope, and trust me,
it could lead to a nightmare.

Thanks for listening –
de Andréa

If you agree please pass
this article on to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance
for them to hear the truth.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

He Got 18 Months For Saying
“Islam is Evil”

Wow…that
means I’ will eventually get the death penalty.

By
de Andréa

January 27, 2015

I guess it’s not just the Islamic terrorists who hate free
speech. Apparently, it’s also the

governments of the so-called free Western
nations. I don’t know if you are brain
dead, but I can assure you that I am not.
This tells me, as it should tell you, that most Western Nations such as
Canada and shortly the U.S. U.K. France, etc. are already controlled by IS
Sharia Law. Because this certainly is
not the law of any Western country that I know, this my friend is pure and
simple barbaric Sharia Law.

What crime did he commit? He was
arrested and then denied bail for saying that he hated Islam.

Things got even worse when Brazau went
before a judge…

The wise
guy judge told him, “You
had a ticket to ride, not a pass to harass.”
Judge Lapkin sentenced Brazau to 18 months in prison, and an additional 2 years’
probation when he’s released. He even added a weapons ban to these 2 years’
probation, because in Lapkin’s point of view“…words are weapons too.”
What about banning the words “Hate
Crime” Judge! You’re using those
words as a weapon against a free people.
Oh! I forgot only tyrants are allowed to have weapons.

This is actually Brazau’s second arrest
for this “crime”… (Honestly, it pains me to even pretend that it’s reasonable
to call any kind of speech a “crime” especially this speech.)

More proof that the West is becoming an
Islamic State: Has a Muslim ever been arrested in any western country for
Hate-Speech for saying he hates Christians and/or Jews? NO! WHY? Because my friend,
we are under Sharia Law and Islam controls the West.

The right to free speech and free
expression is inalienable… not just in American culture, but in Western culture
in general.

I don’t know how Western nations like
Canada,FranceandBritaincould
pretend to rally aroundCharlie
Hebdo… and in the same breath prosecute their own citizens for
saying things that may offend other people. It’s completely absurd and
hypocritical.

If the government will not allow us to
express the things we believe because other people may be offended, then we are
not truly free. It is oppressive Sharia Law. It is not any government’s job to protect our
feelings and it is not the government’s job to dictate our beliefs. Folks, if
we wish to be free and be able to speak freely, it means that we MUST protect all
speech. Even speech we don’t like, maybe ‘especially’speech we don’t like.

THE
BOTTOM LINE:Just
how long do you think it is going to take until this IS Sharia law creeps south
of the Canadian border? Well, as I said earlier if your brain hasn’t died yet,
you will know it already has in one way or another. And like the evil cancer that Islam is, it
will destroy us.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email
list. It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

“It’s time for the pro-life movement and
lovers of life everywhere to expand our vision of the sanctity of human life.
It’s past time to defend the full spectrum of life, from the tiny unnamed
pre-born in the womb, to an oversized Michael Brown, to a New York cop doing
his duty, to any young black male who strays into the path of an armed
vigilante with a concealed carry permit.

The presence of a gun in the homes of women
and children suffering the scourge of domestic violence makes it five times
more likely that the woman will be killed.”

The pro-life movement must bring its voice
of conscience into the conversation and debate over the ominous proliferation
of guns–licensed and unlicensed–in our society.

The pro-life movement has been very vocal
on abortion but far too quiet on gun control. That needs to change.”

So who is Robert Lenard "Rob" Schenck? (Pronounced SHANK)

He was born 1958
in Montclair, New Jersey. He is a
leading American Evangelical pastor to

Since 1982, he
has preached in all 50 states, several Canadian provinces, and over 40
countries. He has created organizations still serving those in need and
providing ongoing spiritual and humanitarian support in such places as Mexico, Egypt,
and Cambodia.

Media outlets and
policy makers seek his opinions on current issues, and he regularly appears as
a guest on news and opinion shows.

And he is
deceived and brainwashed by political correctness. He is also anti-Constitution
and un-American. Furthermore he has lost
the ability to think for himself if he ever had it.

THE BOTTOM LINE:Despite the fact that he claims we should all be pro-life
(and he’s right, we should) and therefor anti-gun as well, because…well because
they go together don’t they? No, you see, they are just the opposite. This is why I say he hasn’t the ability to reason
or think for himself.

Reverend Schenck like many Americans, Christian or
not, are caught up in the brainwashing and robotic programing of the American
citizenry. While pro-life or abortion is
not specifically covered in the U.S. Constitution, the right to be armed
is. So I say he is anti-constitutional. And since the U.S. Constitution is part of
the foundation of America I say he is un-American.

And while I am not going to judge his Christian faith I can judge what he
stands for. The fact he is against the murdering
of innocent children is Biblical but denying one right of self-defense is not.

In the —Gospel of Luke 22:36-38, NIV it says:

[Jesus speaking to his decuples] “He said to them, “But now
if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword,
sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the
transgressors’; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is
written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” The disciples
said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.”“That’s
enough!” he replied.

Here, Jesus, the son of God,
was trying to explain to his friends that they would need to be prepared to
stay mobile (side note: the word fugitive
comes from a Latin root meaning "to flee"): they would need to always
have a purse (for money) and a bag (to carry basic supplies) ready, and that a sword (for protection against other
men) would be more important than a cloak (clothes)in the days to come.

So isn’t anti-gun also anti-Christian? Yes,
I’m afraid it is my friend.

Don’t be fooled by so-called
intellectual Christians who contradict not only themselves but the word of God
for the sake of political acceptance.

So sell your clothes if you
have to, but buy at least two guns…

Thanks for listening – de
Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email
list. It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.