By barring companies from asking prospective employees how much they earned at their last jobs, Massachusetts will ensure that the historically lower wages and salaries assigned to women and minorities do not follow them for their entire careers. Companies tend to set salaries for new hires using their previous pay as a base line.

Now, three members of the U.S. House of Representatives, including Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, the first woman to chair the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), plan to introduce similar legislation federally.

You can read more on this forthcoming bill here. I’ll post a link to the legislation when it is officially introduced.

Good or bad for employees?

Run a Google search on the Massachusetts law and you’ll find scores of article touting its benefits.

But, could restricting company access to salary history actually hurt employees? Well, Rachel Greszler, reporting here, at the right-leaning publication The Daily Signal notes that the new Massachusetts law may bring more harm than good:

When it comes to matching employees with employers, more information is always better. The more employers know about potential employees, and the more job seekers know about potential employees, the more likely there will be a successful match.

Previous pay indicates an employee’s value to their past employers. Often times, pay is even more telling than education or experience.

Withholding valuable information from an employer will only lead to wasted time, low-ball salary offers, and more job turnover.

How should employers respond if a federal version of the Massachusetts law passes?

Other potential interviews must also learn the can’s and can’t-do’s of the new law.

She also underscores the benefits of a self-audit. I agree.

Run the numbers for your similarly-situated employees and, be prepared to explain pay disparities based on a objective criteria. Otherwise, eliminate pay disparities that are potentially based on race/ethnicity and gender.

CONTRIBUTOR:

Eric B. Meyer

You know that scientist in the action movie who has all the right answers if only the government would just pay attention? If you want a nerdy employment-lawyer brain to help you solve HR-compliance issues proactively before the action sequence, as a Partner of a national law firm, FisherBroyles, LLP, I’m here to help. I'm not only an EEOC-approved trainer, I offer day-to-day employment counseling, workplace audits and investigations, and other prophylactic measures to keep your workplace working while you focus on running your business. And for those employers in the midst of conflict, I bring all of my know-how to bear as your zealous advocate. I’m a trial-tested, experienced litigator that has represented companies of all sizes in a veritable alphabet soup of employment law claims, such as the ADA, ADEA, CEPA, FMLA, FLSA, NJLAD, PHRA, Title VII, and USERRA. I also help clients litigate disputes involving restrictive covenants such as non-competition and non-solicitation agreements, as well as conflicts over use of trade secrets and other confidential information. For more about me, my practice, and my firm, click on my full bio.