Pagina's

An interesting and important observation by Dr. North in the wake of the UK riots: A healthy reaction.

This is the good news - that people are banding together to protect their own property and environs. (...)

The merit of such an option is that it formalises (and legitimises) community action – allowing people to take part in the protection of their property without fear of intervention by the police. In effect, it reinforces the idea that a community problem might best be dealt-with by the community. The best police response might be to invite and organise a community response – and then back it up.

The police is limited in time and resources. The first line of defence of our communities is us, banding together, providing mutual support.

15
reacties:

Ferdy
zei

What is wrong with the police, why can’t they stop this? As we know from Norway and the Netherlands, a single deranged shooter can stop a terrible high number of people. But in London criminal gangs can attack people, plunder shops, ransack streets and burn logistic centers, burn shops and even burn houses without a single shot being fired. Apparently is the life and safety of regular folks of less worth than that of violent thugs.

So why is it that the police can’t use their violence monopoly? Why can’t we fight any more for what is right in order to keep the world a safe place? Why can’t fight terrorist? Why can’t we fight pirates? We cannot even fight looters anymore? There is something deeply wrong with our societies.

The only one who can protect themselves in these lawless conditions in the absence of the rule of law is the tribal man. His tribe will protect him against the mobs of the other tribes. Not exactly something to celebrate and certainly not a substitute for the right of self-defense. As the right to self-defense should be guaranteed within the law, not by its absence!

I guess London now shows a government that is dysfunctional. A government that is not up to do its most basic and most import tasks: provide security. It’s going to the hard, it’s legitimacy. But so far, they don’t seem to act as if their legitimacy is under attack.

The media reports are also show us what’s wrong with our attitudes. Just see how they report about this Mark Duggan who was shot by the police. They report his dead is still under investigation and it remains to be seen what actually happened, as if the police was wrong. But is this how one should report about the arrest of an armed gang member from a violent gang who is shot during an arrest by a special police unit in a gang murders investigation? The media loonies now even make a big point about that this thug did not fire his loaded firearm while being shot by the police. As if it’s not a good thing the police officer shot him before he could pull the trigger! No, they complain that the police officer was shot by his own ricochet instead of being shot by the gang member. Apparently the media thinks that a violent criminal who is suspected of murdering others should get all the benefits of the doubts, but that a police officer who is trying to keep him of the street is not to be trusted. Any mistakes the police officer makes, any misjudgment and the police officer must hang. It’s the world upside down.

It’s like we are living in a B movie I remember seeing a long time ago. It was a bad B-movie with a very implausible plot: all NY gangs were ganging up and in a big meeting in central park and decide to work together and they turned NY in big mess by start ransacking the whole city. Amazingly enough the B-movie has become reality, UK gangs apparently have an extensive network via secure blackberries and now join up to loot and no less important to have fun, just like in that stupid B-movie…

Some interesting background about the gang background of these attacks can be found here:http://malpoet.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/from-duggan-to-destruction-stop-the-contagion/http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/08/mark-duggan-profile-tottenham-shootinghttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2023556/Mark-Duggan-Violence-drugs-fatal-stabbing-unlikely-martyr.html?ito=feeds-newsxmlhttp://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/08/09/london-riots-gangs-use-smartphones-designed-for-business-executives-to-organise-looting-115875-23330401/http://sites.google.com/site/londonstreetgangs/gang-lists/north-london-gangs/broadwater-farm-bloodline

The London riots are yet another episode in the slow disintegration of Europe. London is no longer an English city, it’s just another pin on a map. Much of London is a bunch of Third World cultures living in a geographical area that they have no cultural or emotional connection to. The culture around them is as shamelessly materialistic, vulgar and violent as anything in the dark ages– with the occasional tip of the hat to politically correct values involving the environment or tolerating gay people. And the same goes for the rest of Europe’s capitals. Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, Brussels and Oslo are all obvious examples.

The real showdown in London was not between opportunistic rioters and the impotent police, but between African looters and Asian storekeepers fighting a purely materialistic battle. And if the UK’s immigration trends do not change, in a generation or two, the battle will have a much more open character. A struggle for ownership of the city.

Many commentators are elated that communities such as Sikhs, Kurds, Turks,and Muslims in general, organised themselves to defend their community. Atfirst sight, this is re-assuring. But on further thought, what we are see isthat these communities were not defending England and its culture, butterritory they now regard as their own. That territory then becomes Sikhor Islamic as the case maybe - in effect, the Balkanisation of England. The sameis likely to happen in many European countries.

Though I'm very critical of the police setting themselves against theproposition that communities organise their own defence, as I support the ideaof community self-defence if it was defending the nation as a whole. In thepresent circumstance in Europe, that proposition though leads to furthering and legitimising thebreakup and Balkanisation of England.

The reason that the police now need re-assurance that they wont be charged with overuse of force, is because they have completely lost the trust of the majority of the law abiding people. This trust which the British people had in the police, was greater then anywhere in the world. But over the last three decades, the police have themselves abused that trust to such a point, that people regard the police as much as the enemy, if not greater as they are legal, then criminals.

Please read Richard North's articles over the last 6 months on this issue.

It’s mild in comparison to the reality. Richard North at EU Referendum isfar better researched and knowledgeable on the subject.

The trouble in the UKis that the state has become a collection of huge bureaucracies that are notanswerable to anyone, including our elected MPs. The news today is that theACPO chief has told the Home Secretary that she has no power to order thepolice. In effect, the police chief has told the Home Secretary that she has nopowers, and that the Chief constable is the sole authority on policedeployment.

A similar situation pertains right across other state bureaucracies. TheNHS, the largest, is a law in itself, where the patient is simply anecessary nuisance. Education, Ministry of Defence, Foreign office, thejudiciary, and even the BBC, and many more, are a law unto themselves. They arestate funded centrally, and as such have the resources, both financial and bureaucratic, toresist any encroachment on their territory. The citizen is a neutered pawn inthis vast bureaucratic fiefdom. Orwell's 1984 is now well entrenched in the UK.

It is for this reason that Richard North, Wittering from Witney, Raedwald,and others, are now campaigning for Localism. That is, all powers removed fromthe centre, and placed in the hands of citizens at the parish level - similarto Switzerland,where all matters, particularly those of taxation and spend, is in the hands ofthe people at the cantonal level - it is their/our money. Once the people get their hands on how their own money is to be spent, all bureacracies, including the police chiefs and judges, will be brought to heel, and answerable to the people who pay them. In the USA, this approach is gathering pace with the birth of the Tea party - ordinary law abiding tax payers. It is why the oligarchs and their MSM handmaidens, the NY Times etc, are so searingly against the Tea party.

Quit being deceived. The police are not doing anything because they are being told to stay static by leftists in key positions of power who are hellbent on discrediting the conservative government. They are being held back so that these riots can be blamed on the conservatives, as well as the "ineffective" response. So, blame THEM for allowing private property to be destroyed in the name of their sick "revolution."

This should be a clear warning bell of the dangers of a state that is working against the people and uses the power of law enforcement to pacively or militantly harm the populace. And the cops will do what they have to do, if they want to keep their jobs.

I would be surprised to hear that non-white businesses and communities are being attacked. This would seem to be counter-intuitive to the leftist sentiments. Unless these just happen in the course of the chaos, by people who haven't got a little "mixed up" about who their targets are.