I have no recent news about Ernst's situation.
For the last two weeks, all correspondence seems again to have come to
a halt. The next court date will be March 9.

Likewise, I have no information at all
about the other two Revisionist dissidents, Germar Rudolf and Siegfried
Verbeke. About David Irving, a few Zundel comments and a link to an important
BBC poll below.

I know that a call has gone out to Internet
groups to write to the German Embassy in Washington. I am sorry to say
that I consider that an exercise in futility that will only land your name
in the German KGB files. In my opinion, these German Embassies and Consulates
are outposts of the enemy and certainly not there to help their nationals.

Through the German equivalent of the
Freedom of Information Act, we are in the possession of letters that show
clearly that the German Government, through their employees in several
embassies and consulates, aided and abetted the kidnapping of at least
Ernst Zundel if not Germar Rudolf. (There is some evidence of documentary
overlapS] We know of at least one representative of Germany in Canada who
spied on Zundel supporters by infiltrating court hearings and afterwards
reporting on overheard comments. This deceitful creature described these
thoroughly middle-class, orderly, average, decent, law-abiding Zundel supporters
in derogatory terms - for example, as being &laqno; unkempt » and
&laqno; paranoid. ».

These Embassy and consulate poodles
of the German government brazenly discussed with their Canadian and American
counterparts the means of criminalizing Ernst at all costs, the mechanics
of denying him a passport, as well as Ernst's deportation to Germany away
from the eyes of the media. {Hence the expensive charter flightS}

When I tried to initiate some intervention
by asking the Atlanta Consulate to help me get an emergency appointment
with the Washington Ambassador, an SOS was immediately sent to Washington
warning them of my impending visit, resulting in a return request to be
sure to warn them ahead of my coming.

These are only a few of the exceedingly
valuable documents we have secured that show malfeasance by the German
government. This evidence can be expected to be very useful as Ernst's
Holocaust Heresy Trial proceeds and in his subsequent appeals, since a
conviction seems already a foregone conclusion.

====

A few snippets about David Irving and
Austria:

I ask my Zgram friends to vote in this
CNN Poll and ask as many of your friends to do the same. The question
polled is, "Is Austria right to have a law against Holocaust denial?"

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/02/20/austria.irving.trial.ap/

=====

In an excerpted, heavily edited letter,
already written before Christmas to a friend, Ernst briefly comments on
David Irving's arrest:

[START]

What could possibly have possessed that
man to go to Austria - at this time? I am simply flabbergasted! With
my arrest and treatment, and now the others like [Siegfried] Verbeke and
Germar [Rudolf], it was clear for whom they were gunning - therefore,
one more time, let me be clear about this: NOBODY is safe from arrest,
as these people are desperately trying to keep their lucrative business
going a few more years. NOBODY is served by one more famous revisionist
being arrested while walking into a trap - NOBODY is safe, NOBODY will
get a &laqno;safe conduct» pass as a witness - please realize that.
They will just laugh at the foolishness of self-immolation. While I appreciate
the noble gesture and sacrifice planned [by] a friend, I counsel against
any such plans. We do not need more imprisoned martyrs - we need living
symbols in freedom who can write, speak, witness to their knowledge and
findings. This is peasant logic speaking - nobody is asking anybody to
be a Socrates or a Jan Hus.

Things are evolving so fast that soon
we will find a totally different political situation, far more conducive
to our ideas and concepts. Testimony can be given in the courts of other
countries. It is not necessary to physically go to the countries where
various trials are being held.

[END]

=====

An American writer, J.P. Bellinger,
author of 'Himmlers Tod"/Himmler's Death, sent three poignant questions
to the Austrian government, replete with good advice:

[START]

To Whom It May Concern:

I have a few questions I should like
to ask you in regard to Austrian Law.

* Does Austria have a law which will
punish denial or the minimization of the murder of tens of millions of
white Christians at the hands of the mostly Jewish Communists in Eastern
Europe during the period 1917-1980?

* Will you please explain to me what
makes the 'holocaust' so sacrosanct that it requires punitive laws in order
to protect it from legitimate inquiry and revision?

* Does Austria intend to arrest and
prosecute Jewish historians like Arno Meyer, who have also questioned or
otherwise deviated from the mainstream version of the holocaust?

Punishing individuals for freely expressing
their legitimate opinions is antidemocratic and a mark of FEAR and lack
of confidence in one's own ability to refute the research and evidence
provided by dissident historians such as David Irving and Germar Rudolf.

Such persecution does the Austrian nation
a great disservice and will most assuredly lead to a backlash over time,
whereby these attempts to stifle free thought and enquiry will only lead
to greater numbers of individuals questioning the mainstream version of
the holocaust. It is as inevitable as the day is long, and perhaps it
is long overdue. Austrian legislators should realize that questioning
aspects of the holocaust is not equivalent to 'denying the holocaust' which
is after all, a matter of proper definition. Even so, the mere questioning
of 'any' historical event should never require legislation to compel rigid
belief and conformity.

To quote Charles Dickens, "If that
is what the law thinks, then the law is an ass."