When comparing AMPPS Stack vs IntelliJ IDEA, the Slant community recommends IntelliJ IDEA for most people. In the question“What are the best power user tools for macOS?”IntelliJ IDEA is ranked 37th while AMPPS Stack is ranked 62nd. The most important reason people chose IntelliJ IDEA is:

IDEA places an emphasis in safe refactoring, offering a [variety of features](https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/features/refactoring.html) to make this possible for a variety of languages.
These features include safe delete, type migration and replacing method code duplicates.

Ad

Specs

No specs yet!

Auto CompleteYes

Bracket MatchingYes

Code TemplatesYes

Cross PlatformYes

Integrated DebuggerYes

Multi Language SupportYes

PlatformsWindows, macOS, Linux

PriceUS $ 499. 00-US $ 649. 00 year

Source Control IntegrationYes

Very intuitive shortcuts and shortcut managementContains new ideas for boosting productivity

Pros

Pro

MySQL Support

including phpMyAdmin and MySQL server

Pro

Built-in FTP Server

Convenient for moving files between desktop and server

Pro

SQLite Support

SQLite management tools included

Pro

Smart refactorings

IDEA places an emphasis in safe refactoring, offering a variety of features to make this possible for a variety of languages.These features include safe delete, type migration and replacing method code duplicates.

Pro

Gradle support

Pro

Buit-in Git support

Ad

Cons

Con

Somewhat expensive

Con

Slow startup

Startup can be slow deepending on system configuration

Con

Uses a lot of RAM

Con

Standard hotkeys behave differently

Seems like hotkeys assignment in Idea has no logical consistency.

Like «F3» is usually next match, «Ctrl+W» - close tab, etc — they map to some different action by default.There is a good effort in making the IDE friendly for immigrants from other products: there are options to use hotkeys from Eclipse, and even emacs. But these mappings are very incomplete. And help pages do not take this remapping into account, rather mentioning the standard hotkeys.

So, people coming from other IDEs/editors are doomed to using mouse and context menus (which are rather big and complex).

Con

Bugs are not solved as often as they should

They are more interested in adding new features or issuing new versions than solving bugs.

Con

Cannot open multiple projects in the same window

Con

Built with closed source components

The version with full features is not opensource. Parts of the code are under apache licence though.

Con

Lack of plugins

IntelliJ supports a very small amount of plugins. Although these are 'quality approved', many features are missing and can't be implemented because of that.

Alternative Products

Each month, over 2.8 million people use Slant to find the best products and share their knowledge. Pick the tags you’re passionate about to get a personalized feed and begin contributing your knowledge.