PMA3 is soon to be re-located from Unity Nadir to Unity Port (according to the ISS schedule of events thread), so is there to be another swap before Node 3 flies?

Yes.

So let me get this straight. PMA 3 will be re-located early July to the Port CBM of Unity, not be used (according to ISS Scedule of Events thread), then be re-re-located back to Nadir before the middle of December when Node 3 will be attached to the Port CBM?

PMA3 is soon to be re-located from Unity Nadir to Unity Port (according to the ISS schedule of events thread), so is there to be another swap before Node 3 flies?

Yes.

So let me get this straight. PMA 3 will be re-located early July to the Port CBM of Unity, not be used (according to ISS Scedule of Events thread), then be re-re-located back to Nadir before the middle of December when Node 3 will be attached to the Port CBM?

PMA3 is soon to be re-located from Unity Nadir to Unity Port (according to the ISS schedule of events thread), so is there to be another swap before Node 3 flies?

Yes.

So let me get this straight. PMA 3 will be re-located early July to the Port CBM of Unity, not be used (according to ISS Scedule of Events thread), then be re-re-located back to Nadir before the middle of December when Node 3 will be attached to the Port CBM?

That sounds like nonsense to me.

Yes it would if you would make a quick snap judgement without checking for data or reading the other threads on this topic.

The Node 3 was originall scheduled for the nadir. Node 1 was plumbed for that position. Node 1 now has to be replumbed with all the power, data, air flow etc to go to the port. To do that we need a pressurized module on the other side of the bulkhead to do the work. PMA3 will be relocated to provide that volume. This way, on 20A Node 3 When done, it will then be relocated back to the nadir. Do we have your approval now?

The Node 3 was originall scheduled for the nadir. Node 1 was plumbed for that position. Node 1 now has to be replumbed with all the power, data, air flow etc to go to the port. To do that we need a pressurized module on the other side of the bulkhead to do the work. PMA3 will be relocated to provide that volume. When done, it will then be relocated back to the nadir.

Thanks erioladastra for the explanation. Finally all becomes clear! :O)

PMA3 is soon to be re-located from Unity Nadir to Unity Port (according to the ISS schedule of events thread), so is there to be another swap before Node 3 flies?

Yes.

So let me get this straight. PMA 3 will be re-located early July to the Port CBM of Unity, not be used (according to ISS Scedule of Events thread), then be re-re-located back to Nadir before the middle of December when Node 3 will be attached to the Port CBM?

That sounds like nonsense to me.

Yes it would if you would make a quick snap judgement without checking for data or reading the other threads on this topic.

The Node 3 was originall scheduled for the nadir. Node 1 was plumbed for that position. Node 1 now has to be replumbed with all the power, data, air flow etc to go to the port. To do that we need a pressurized module on the other side of the bulkhead to do the work. PMA3 will be relocated to provide that volume. This way, on 20A Node 3 When done, it will then be relocated back to the nadir. Do we have your approval now?

That all makes sense. Always had my approval, just didn't understand (which in itself isn't unusual). Always best to ask?

Not sure that that full an explanation has been provided on any other (L1) thread (I can't find it). Sorry if my bad choice of words caused offense.

As per the Russians and European websites and now even Nasa, most of the updated computer models images of Alpha all have node 3 (tranquility) latched onto Port side CBM.. i am in no way a professional in the space field (as much as i would love to be) but i always thought node 3 looked much better on the nadar cbm then Port.. i understand the margins with the russian segments going but but if there was ever to be additions to the station via the cbms the only feasable place would be unity nadar or even harmony nadar.. i remember reading on this site about the brits possible adding the HEM modules to tranquility port and starboard CBMS but i guess that was just like everything else in the space world... ALL TALK NO ACTION..

it really is a shame that they will have all those open slots and nothing to add to them..