Tree of Liberty

Patriot’s

Fascism

End the FED

Death of the Golden State

Equal Opportunity vs. Equal Results- In 2007 the Federal Government Continued to Discriminate Against Whites and Males

In 2007 the Federal Government Continued to Discriminate Against Whites and Males

Equal Opportunity vs. Equal ResultsWeb Posted July 23, 2007

[July 23, 2007 — Washington, DC] Today Adversity.Net released its seventh annual analysis and critique of federal overhiring of selected races in the name of “affirmative action”. The government’s official statistics show a pattern of “un-hiring” and “retiring” white males and other non-preferred groups while overhiring blacks and other preferred groups by dozens or hundreds of percent above their proportion in the civilian work force. It is alright for the feds to violate the AA creed of “proportional representation” as long as the disproportion favors certain races.

This graphic shows the dramatic downward trend in federal hiring of non-preferred groups (white males and others) from 2000 to the present.

This graphic shows the dramatic upward trend in federal hiring of preferred minorities from 2000 to the present.

Adversity.Net’s analysis is based on the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s annual report “Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program”.

This year’s OPM report — covering federal Fiscal Year 2006 — among other things boasts that the feds hired 6,912 new minorities last year while at the same time “dis-hiring” or “retiring” 6,280 white males and other non-preferred groups. As always, the OPM report is confounding in two regards. First, the OPM defines “women” as minorities which category includes women of all races including “white”. Second, the OPM continues to refuse to publish any data whatsoever regarding employment of white males, and studiously avoids presenting data which depicts the decrease in employment of white males and other non-preferred groups.

From FY 2001 through FY 2006 a net total of 48,033 new minority employees have been hired by the feds. During the same period there has been a net decrease of 3,960 white male employees in federal jobs. See table and graphic, below:

Fiscal Year:

New Minority Jobs:

New Non-Minority Jobs:

2001

9,490

2,820

2002

3,451

-5,309

2003

864

-7,529

*2004

21,078

16,517

2005

6,238

-4,179

2006

6,912

-6,280

TOTAL:

48,033

-3,960

*NOTE: FY 2004 represents an artificial “spike” in the data. In 2004 the U.S. OPM added 168,616 job classifications to their annual EEO tally, causing a one-time distortion in data for that year. Also in 2004 OPM began using 2000 census data as the basis for its underrepresentation computations whereas in prior years they used 1990 census data.

The feds exceed their hiring quotas for blacks in all 23 independent federal agencies.

In fact, in the top three independent federal agencies for black quota hires, the other preferred groups did not do so well.

CSOS (Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency) overhired blacks by 808% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.GPO (U.S. Gov’t Printing Office) overhired blacks by 503% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.

PBGC (the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation) overhired blacks by 409% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.

Almost all the other preferred race / gender groups in these three agencies were hired at rates at or below their proportion in the civilian labor force.

Similarly, in 17 of the 18 federal executive departments, blacks were overhired by 14% to 363% over their proportion in the civilian labor force. The graphic below illustrates the dramatic overhiring of blacks by the top three federal executive departments:

HUD (U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development) overhired blacks by 363% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.The Department of Education overhired blacks by 329% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.

And the U.S. Department of State overhired blacks by 231% over their proportion in the civilian labor force.

Most of the other preferred groups were hired by these three agencies at significantly lower levels than blacks.

Independent Federal Agencies:
BLACKS

% Overhiring of Blacks in All 22 Independent Federal Agencies

According to OPM’s FY 2006 report, all 23 independent federal agencies exceeded their racial quotas for hiring blacks by dozens or even hundreds of percent.

Next:
Exec.
Depts.

This year the First Place prize in the federal quota competition again goes to Court Services and Offender Services (CSOS) for employing 808% more blacks than their affirmative action target (quota).

And NASA again came in dead last by exceeding its black hiring quota by a mere 49%

Each of the other 23 independent federal agencies exceeded their racial quotas for hiring blacks in FY 2006 by 62% to 503%.

Five Best Agencies for Blacks

In FY 2006 the five best independent agencies for blacks turned out to be among the worst for the other preferred minorities.

This graphic shows the same “five best independent agencies for blacks” without all the other preferred races.

The five best independent agencies for overhing blacks in FY 2006 were CSOS (808%), U.S. GPO (503%), the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) at 409%, the EEOC (401%), and the Smithsonian Institution (338%).

Five Worst Agencies for Blacks

In FY 2006 these five federal agencies had the “lowest” rate of overhiring blacks.

Same five agencies without the other races shown.

The five “worst” agencies for blacks still over shot their racial quotas by significant amounts: NASA (49%), the National Credit Union Association (NCUA) at 62%, NRC (68%), FDIC (97%), and the Securities and Exchange Commission at 113%. These percentages represent the amount by which the agency overhired blacks as compared to the availability of this group in the civilian work force.

1.2 – Federal Executive Departments:
BLACKS

Next:
Data
Tables

OPM’s FY 2006 report reveals that among the 18 federal executive departments, once again this year only the Department of the Interior failed to achieve its racial hiring goal (quota) for hiring blacks. Interior “under” hired blacks by -37%, i.e., they don’t “look like America” because they hired 37% fewer blacks than are available in the civilian labor force.

All of the other 17 federal executive departments exceeded their racial quotas for hiring blacks by a minimum of +14% (Air Force) to an impressive +363% (Housing and Urban Development).

Five Best Departments for Blacks

The five “best” federal executive departments for overhing blacks were HUD (363%), the Dept. of Education (329%), the Dept. of State (231%), the Labor Dept. (176%), and the Veteran’s Administration (147%).

Five Worst Departments for Blacks

In FY 2006 these five departments had the lowest rate of overhiring blacks beyond their quota.

Five worst departments without the other preferred groups shown.

Most of the bottom five “worst” independent agencies for overhiring blacks in FY 2006 still managed to exceed their quota by significant percentages. The exception is the Dept. of the Interior which once again missed their quota by -37%. However, the next “worst” agency for blacks, the Air Force, exceeded their quota for blacks by 14%, the Dept. of Agriculture by 15%, the Navy by 19%, and the U.S. Dept. of Transportation by 22%.

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological, political and humanitarian significance.

We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Update:
In an effort to keep our readers aware of the world around them, due to the continued removal of free speech post and censorship, we will be in the process of looking for a new home for this site.

6/20/2011
We have located a new home for this site, please stand by for further instructions.

Locust Blog

Creative Commons Lic- See Authors links

Race Realism

‘Man is a mammal and subject to the same biological laws as other animals. All animals, including Man, have inheritable behavioural traits. The concept of complete environmental plasticity of human intelligence is a nonsensical wishful-thinking illusion.’

From titans to Lemmings

“The time for talk has ended, only course of action open to us is WAR!”

"The time for talk has ended, only course of action open to us is WAR!"

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. — D.H. Lawrence

Ayers’ Plan to Kill 25 Million Americans
Larry Grathwol, Weathermen, William Ayers, Communism, History
line

“The most effective informer the F.B.I. ever placed among the Weathermen” (NY Times) Larry Grathwol describes how William Ayers and other Weather Underground leaders cheerfully planned to deliver the United States to foreign occupation, and proposed to murder 25 million Americans.

Grathwohl: I brought up the subject of what’s going to happen after we take over the government. You know, we become responsible for administrating, you know, 250 million people. And there was no answer. No one had given any thought to economics. How are you going to clothe and feed these people?

The only thing that I could get was that they expected that the Cubans, the North Vietnamese, the Chinese and the Russians would all want to occupy different portions of the United States. They also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the counter-revolution. And they felt that this counter-revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing re-education in the Southwest where we would take all of the people who needed to be re‑educated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I asked, “Well, what is going to happen to those people that we can’t re‑educate, that are die-hard capitalists?” And the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated and when I pursued this further, they estimated that they’d have to eliminate 25 million people in these re‑education centers. And when I say eliminate, I mean kill 25 million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of whom have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well-known educational centers and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead serious.

Bring it on! WE WILL FIGHT YOU, WE HAVE BEEN MAKING BOMBS AND BUYING LEGAL AND ILLEGAL WEAPONS FOR YEARS, AND WHEN THE TIME COMES MY FELLOW PATRIOTS AND MYSELF, WE WILL TAKE TO THE STREETS, YOU WILL HAVE TO KILL US TO TAKE THIS NATION, BRING IT!!