Advertisements

To read more than 200 comments...

Click on the title of any post. It is a link to a separate page that shows all the comments. Scroll down to the bottom of the comments until you see the words newer and newest next to the number of comments on the right. Those words are links that will lead you to a new page of comments. :)

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Kaia Crawford is the ten year old daughter of Cindy Crawford. She is making her modeling debut as the face of the Young Versace line. You know, because it is never too early to get your kid wanting really expensive fashions they will grow out of in three months.

The more shocking thing to me is that she is only 10. She looks like no other 10 year old I have ever seen. Take away the great photographer, the photoshopping and airbrushing and she still looks to be in her late teens and if you told me she was 20, I would probably agree.

48 comments:

Another child of a celebrity doing what the parents do or because of the parents. Forget all of the real children who are talented who will never get a chance, but this one will because of her parents, and I bet she will not have to work so hard. This is with modeling, acting, singing etc etc.

I don't understand the obsession with sexualizing young children... between the youngest two Jenner girls and Toddlers and Tiaras (just the first two examples that popped into my head) it's just not right. Kids need to be kids. You can never get your childhood back, and you have the rest of your life after to be an adult, so why rush it?

Yes, she's beautiful and she's Cindy's daughter. But ten? I completely agree with ghost. You can say yeah, it's just pictures. But the worst part is how people will treat her because of the photos. She is now a sexual entity. I say shame on Cindy for allowing this so early in her daughter's life.

The photo/make up and re-touching is INAPPROPRIATE, period.There intention was to make her look older/more enticing than she is. There is a suggestive tone here in her facial shading, her posing and the angle of the camera in regards to the short skirt.

Why do they have to put her in such a short skirt? She's only 10 yrs old. I would never let my 10 yr old out of the house in a skirt that short. This is why our youth is growing up too fast. Hollywood has an obsession with the young, trying to make them into adults. You hit 40 and you're over the hill and made fun of, even if you still look good.

Somebody here pointed me to the Model book and that has every reason why this shouldn't happen and Cindy should know better. At least Madonna waited until Lourdes was a teenager. (Can anyone believe I just wrote that?!?!)

Thank you crila and Tara! I kept reading the comments wondering why no one thought the skirt was inappropriate and then I thought I must be really old fashioned. Glad to see others are thinking it too. NO way would I let a child walk out the door that way. If anyone has watched To Catch a Predator on Dateline, you know creeps come in all forms from labor workers to doctors. You just never know who is looking at your child with those eyes. Gross!

The girl has Cindy Crawford's face, skin, hair, and will probably have that insane body pretty soon, too. With or without the nepotism, she'd have a big career in the industry. She's a stunning kid.

Cindy's no dummy, and I'd like to think that she'll be protective over her daughter in an industry full of sleazy weirdos. Kaia grew up watching what her mom did for a living, and wanted a piece of it. That's not shocking. I'm not saying she's way too young (she is), but there are plenty of child models who emerge from the industry unscathed.

Oh, and that skirt IS too damned short, and I also think that Versace is too sexy of a line in general to have a children's clothing division. It would be like Victoria's Secret coming out with underoos or something.

I'm kind of surprised at the comments about her last name. I think it's great that a child has the mother's last name, lord knows women do most of the work.

As was said already, she'd have a career in modelling regardless. Look at her (and her height). As long as her parents keep a very close eye on her, she hopefully will be ok. Aside from the short skirt, I don't see anything that bad in this photo. Without being told her age, she looks very young.

I disagree about Cindy being no dummy. She allowed this child to be photographed topless wearing bikini shorts with a henna tattoo on her lower back in some very sexual pictures when Kaia was SIX. I was disgusted, and lost any respect I had for Cindy then. She sickens me.

@parissucks -- I just googled that photo, and was dismayed to find a shot of Kaia with a come-hither look and a temporary tramp stamp. :-( That photo makes this one look pretty innocuous.

I don't have kids, but even I'm terrified of how quickly they're growing up lately. I saw a toddler at a yard sale a few years ago with patent leather hooker boots and it was all I could do not to throttle the mother. Not *my* business...

She's really pretty, and she definitely looks older than 10. My goddaughter is 10 and doesn't look nearly this old. And yes, on a girl or woman of any age, a skirt that short should be worn with tights.

Parrisucksliterally, I remember those bathing suit photos you mentioned. I also remember being stunned at how sexualized Kaia was, and how Cindy brushed away the criticisms. Kaia was topless with her back to the camera, and she was looking over her shoulder at the photographer in a very provocative sort of way. Nothing sweet or childish about those pictures, they were almost kiddie porn.

Kaia is using her own last name (Gerber) for modeling. Her dad Randy also used to model. I think Cindy's son, Pressley, is really the better looking of Cindy's children. I imagine he'll be modeling or acting sometime soon as well.

Reese, I too was shocked at Cindy's reaction. Those photos would have been fine to keep personally, but when we know the amount of people who get off on kiddie porn, to publish them? And by the way, I must correct myself- she was FOUR. *gags*

Kaia is very beautiful like her mother was but this picture disturbs me because the girl is only 10 years old and the pose is highly sexualized, why would any mother allow her child to be viewed like this is beyond me, Cindy should know better having been in the biz.

Maybe it's me, but she doesn't look 'sexual' at all - just beautiful. I think she still looks pretty prepubescent (flat shoes, boney knees, flat chest) and her makeup looks appropriate for a child model - pretty, but not sexy and not glamourous.

I was a 10 in 1974 and we wore stupid looking mini skirts as I recall. I think the theory was that because we were children, there wasn't anything sexy about it. It was just cute - and 10 year old legs couldn't be sexy. I dunno, I guess I'm on the "in the eye of the beholder." If you see a half dressed child on the beach and think 'sex' maybe part of the problem is you, not the kid.

It just makes me sad that kids can't play dress up or play in the ocean without people having a conniption fit about what's 'appropriate.'

On the other hand - the parents on Toddlers and Tiaras should be hauled in for abuse and exploitation.

I don't think 10 year olds should be presented like women. There is girl about this age in my daughter's swim class who wears a very skimpy bikini, so skimpy that it makes me uncomfortable as a mom. Even though most of us are not having sexual thoughts about children, the pedophiles certainly are.

@Fawn Newn -- I partly agree with you. There have been instances on this site wherein people have hollered about the over-sexualization of children in regards to pictures that I found relatively harmless. That Brooke Shields-y child model in French Vogue comes to mind.

And I don't think this particular picture of Khia is "sexy" -- but I do echo the other readers who say the skirt is waaaaaay too short. I know that high fashion is dramatic and ridiculous and not REALLY for the 99%, but if you've got a kids clothing line to advertise, why show something that most ten year-old girls would get sent home from school for wearing?

Khia isn't Gisele. She's not even a *tween* yet, but she's obviously got the knowing, self-assured demeanor that shouldn't hit her until MUCH later.

As for the link that parissucks posted, what really bugs me about it is the placement of Khia's tattoo. Girls seem to get tattoos in that spot because they think it's an alluring bodily zone (or whatever). I just feel as if I've seen twentysomething models replicate that same pose and expression in issues of Sports Illustrated or the bigger fashion mags. I don't think it's odd for little kids to run around naked, but I think it's weird when they pretend to be alluring.

What parent encourages this? Not impressed. I hope we don't have to endure "poor" Cindy mom when the kid goes off the rails and starts doing drugs and other stuff from hanging out with adults - if she isn't already

At 10 years old perhaps she could be trying things she might be good at and enjoy like music, dance, sports, acting, art, etc...so that when's she is an adult she will have something besides her looks to give her self-confidence.

She is the spitting image of her mom. It's actually quite disturbing how much of a mini-Cindy Kaia is. Even if I was a supermodel or had modeled in the past and knew the industry backwards, I'd be reticent to let my pre-teen daughter model. Heck, I'd be resistant to let my 15 or 16 year old daughter model. But that's just me. YMMV.

Her legs have been so grossly photoshopped, I wonder if the skirt really is that short. Its a nice picture, with all the editing, but she seems like a very pretty girl with fantastic hair. At 10 she should be doing ads for Target's weekly brochure.

Every PedoBear on the internet is doing monkey spank to the socks and sandals right now. And isn't Cindy rumored to be the one that likes group sex so much? And there were the reports about it but she had everything swept under the table because she had more $$$ than those reporting this??? Isn't that what's up with Clooney, A-Rod and all that crew and why they go through women so often??????

Advertisements

Patreon

Search Crazy Days and Nights

Get in touch & Follow us

Advertisements

Labels

Advertisements

Design By

Advertisements

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.

Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements
Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.