What is with the Journal. For many years Morgan Stanley has been the target of numerous negative pieces. How about some objective reporting?

1:43 pm June 29, 2011

want to doubt GS but cant wrote :

I have no basis to agree or disagree with the commentary on Morgan Stanley, but it doesn't hurt GS that they throw so many sharp analysts at every question. Afterall, the guy (or girl) with thier name on the marquee can only read from the script thier given.

3:59 pm June 29, 2011

bankster1 wrote :

Sounds like Morgan Stanley has some loose controls in place. This is a firm that aims high, but shoots itself in the foot with these bad bets. The article shows that had the free markets been allowed to work, Citi and MS would have failed in 2008, and the bad bet would never have been made. Meanwhile, does Morgan Stanley do anything right? if they screw up a trade, how can we trust them to manage a brokerage 3x larger than anything they've ever managed? I'd be bailing out of that ship with those sticks in the mud in charge.

11:01 am July 1, 2011

Anonymous wrote :

Morgan stanley has no plan to recover. They should change some of the management staff and bring new people from outside. i don't see Paul taubman and ruth porat handling critical positions but their delivery is zero.

Chairman and CEo has to take some tough decisions but they have to otherwise MS will become a japanese bank.

By creating price hyopes and releasing false news in the market does not help it will only hurt them. It's we who will invest the bank.

James wake up and come up with a change ?

11:03 am July 1, 2011

jimmy wrote :

Morgan stanley has no plans, its the next sinking ship, I have invested my money JPMC from MS.

Add a Comment

Error message

Name

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the use of your real name.