Suzuki Saves Weight With Extruded Suspension Arm

Long before President Obama announced the goal of achieving 54.5mpg by 2025, fuel economy has been a major concern of automakers. Reducing vehicle weight is one way to improve fuel efficiency. Automotive engineers routinely struggle to remove a few pounds of weight from a design. The use of lightweight materials is key to these efforts. Recent articles in Design News have covered such topics as aluminum metal matrix composite brake rotors, hybrid aluminum wheels with a polyurethane foam filling and a plastic outer shell, and carbon fiber composite structural components, among others.

Most of these developments have the disadvantage of adding significant cost. It’s rare to find a way to reduce weight that is cost-neutral, and rarer still to find one that actually reduces cost.

In a paper published in the January issue of the SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, and presented last year at the SAE Small Engine Technology Conference in Madison, Wis., Gouki Yotsuya and Ryo Yamauchi describe Suzuki’s successful efforts to do just that.

Suzuki developed an extruded aluminum lower control arm that weighs 50 percent less than a welded steel design, while costing roughly the same. It weighs 30 percent less than an aluminum die-cast control arm, and costs 22 percent less. The new extruded control arm is currently being used on the Suzuki Kizashi midsized sedan.

Yotsuya and Yamauchi’s paper is interesting not only because it describes a relatively new use for aluminum extrusions, but also because it provides a window into Suzuki's design process.

Suzuki already had experience using aluminum extrusions for motorcycle swing arms. For swing arms, extruded sections are typically welded to a cast cross-member. For the lower control arm, Suzuki decided to go with a single extrusion, eliminating the need for welding or multiple pieces.

In order to do this, a heat-treated extruded profile was cut to the desired length, then bent into the desired shape using a press. Lengthwise slots were cut on both ends of the extrusion (the bushing end and on the steering knuckle end), and on the top (for the coil spring). The material on the bushing end was then pressed (“shrunk”) to the desired width. Finally, holes were drilled for the steering knuckle and the bushing.

This process made it possible to form the control arm from a single extrusion, but the open section on the bushing end had a low torsional rigidity. Pressing in the bushing increased the stiffness. However, cyclic corrosion tests showed galvanic corrosion between the aluminum extrusion and the steel outer shell of the bushing. To avoid this problem, Suzuki engineers decided to make the outer shell of the bushing out of aluminum.

This eliminated the galvanic couple, but pressing aluminum into aluminum led to a new problem: galling. Reducing the interference fit to prevent galling did not leave enough press force to retain the bushing. The Suzuki engineers attempted to improve the retention by expanding the ends of the outer shell after installation, pressing on them to clinch the bushing in place. Unfortunately, the shell buckled before the ends expanded enough to provide an adequate clinch.

In order to solve this problem, the Suzuki engineers developed a special punch with four raised, curved features. Instead of pressing on the entire outside diameter of the bushing, the new punch pressed on the outer shell of the bushing into a four-leaf clover shape. This clinched the bushing into place without buckling the outer shell.

Normal manufacturing variation in the properties of the extruded aluminum was another challenge. If the material was too hard, it would crack in the forming process. If the material was too soft, it would break in endurance testing. Suzuki developed a special chemistry and heat treatment for the aluminum to avoid these extremes.

The result of all of these efforts was a savings in both cost and weight. Suzuki’s success in achieving both goals simultaneously is noteworthy. The behind-the-scenes look into the development process, as seen in Yotsuya and Yamauchi’s paper, provides valuable lessons. Their example may encourage other engineers to explore the potential of aluminum extrusions.

What an amazing story. Too often, the best material innovations cost far too much and therefore never see the light of day. It seems hard to believe, but most automakers fight for pennies -- because by the time they build a million of one part, those pennies add up. It's startling to see a part that weighs 30% less at equal cost. Dave, any idea how many pounds are saved here?

@Charles: Actually, it weighs 50% less at an equal cost, compared to a welded steel part. The 30% figure is in comparison to an aluminum die casting, but the die casting is more expensive.

Unfortunately, the paper doesn't say the amount of weight saved, just the percentage reduction. The big deal, which I should have mentioned in the article, is that this is unsprung weight. Reductions in unsprung weight mean better ride quality in addition to better fuel economy.

By the way, if you want to know what the part looks like, it's part 16 in this diagram.

It's unfortunate that Suzuki made the decision to stop selling cars in the U.S., because the Kizashi is a pretty neat car. However, the authors indicated that this technology may find its way into Suzuki's ATVs and other vehicles.

I wonder what the business implications of this are. Are any aspects of this technology patentable? Could Suzuki be seeing some licensing revenue on the horizon? With the 54.5-mpg mandate coming, I'm sure a lot of automakers would be interested.

@Charles: Yes, there is a Japanese patent (2010-254255) that covers this invention.

Interestingly enough, there is a U.S. patent (7,850,182), assigned to Hyundai, that covers something pretty similar, except that the extrusion has a double wall, and is formed in a different way. Hyundai presented their work at the SAE World Congress. I'm not sure whether this is currently being used on any Hyundai vehicles or not.

Hyundai had a lot of problems with corrosion on steel control arms a few years ago, so their interest in aluminum control arms is understandable. (Of course, aluminum is not immune to corrosion, either, as the Suzuki engineers found out!)

I agree that this is a good story. To me it is surprising that most articles focus on weight reduction. While I agree that weight hurts mileage, aerodynamics play a much bigger role in efficiency (even at low speeds).

Another MAJOR area of improvement would be updating the infrastructure. I know research is being done in this area, but it feels slow coming. Countries like Belarus already have digital signs posted on the roads instead of speed limits showing the speed you should be traveling to avoid stopping at a red light. Rest of the world has roundabouts instead of 4 way stops which allows traffic to flow without stopping.

As a bicyclist, I am constantly reminded how much energy it takes to ride in constant start-stop traffic and it makes me try to coast as much as possible to avoid stopping. Or how much more effort it takes to ride upright vs tucked position even at 10 or 15mph.

From the automakers point of view, I don't know if aerodynamics or weight reduction is more important to the future of fuel efficiency, VadimR, but I can assure you that automakers are working furiously on both. I can barely get through a conversation with auto engineers these days without multiple references to CFD studies.

"fuel economy has been a major concern of automakers. Reducing vehicle weight is one way to improve fuel efficiency."

Dave, there is no doubt that mileage of automobiles is a major concern, especially when crude oil prices are rising day by day. For these automobile companies has to tune the engine performance for a better mileage either by reducing the curb weight or increasing the engine performance.

I keep a vehicle until it is ready to go to the scrap yard. The down side of this is now we have a rubber bushing that will age and fail, that requires the replacement of an entire control arm $$$. This proabaly will be a OEM only part, in 10 years not available. Over the life of the vehicle the fuel saved will not cover the cost of the repair.

@ragtoplvr: That's a good point. The crimping method used to lock the bushing in place would make it difficult to replace just the bushing; it would be hard to get it out, and you'd need a special tool to install a new one. (Assuming you can even get just the bushing by itself, rather than the entire lower control arm assembly). This part was clearly designed for manufacturing, not for service.

You're definitely right about OEM pricing, too. The MSRP for the lower control arm assembly is $357, although you can buy it online for under $300. For comparison, you can get a (non-OEM) rear lower control arm for a Ford Focus for around $35 - $50 online. And given that Suzuki isn't selling cars in the U.S. anymore, you'll be lucky to find one at any price ten years from now.

The very expensive control arm replacement may not be needed. Removing the failed bushing could be done by squeezing it moore, after pushing out the failed rubber portion. Then squeeze until it will pass through the hole in the arm. IT should be possible to crimp the replacement enough to hold it in place , even if the job is not as pretty as the original. Of course a replacemnt bushing could also have threads and a retainer nut, because it would still be a lot cheaper than a new assembly. But probably they won't license anybody to make repair parts.

Excellent Article Dave. To me, the most important aspect to this article is--Suzuki management gave the design team the necessary TIME, software and resources to get this project accomplished. ( I have to assume that's the case.) I would love to know the time frame involved and if they did use CFD when working the problem. Again, great post.

Suzuki is one off those companies which can set new trends in a new way. When i ride on suzuki it make me feel reliablity and trust . Suzuki motorcycle accessories are also have the same condidtion. Your article is quiet good. i rec it while i am thinking that new motorcycles are stuck but now i acn say wait and watch.

Industrial workplaces are governed by OSHA rules, but this isn’t to say that rules are always followed. While injuries happen on production floors for a variety of reasons, of the top 10 OSHA rules that are most often ignored in industrial settings, two directly involve machine design: lockout/tagout procedures (LO/TO) and machine guarding.

Load dump occurs when a discharged battery is disconnected while the alternator is generating current and other loads remain on the alternator circuit. If left alone, the electrical spikes and transients will be transmitted along the power line, leading to malfunctions in individual electronics/sensors or permanent damage to the vehicle’s electronic system. Bottom line: An uncontrolled load dump threatens the overall safety and reliability of the vehicle.

While many larger companies are still reluctant to rely on wireless networks to transmit important information in industrial settings, there is an increasing acceptance rate of the newer, more robust wireless options that are now available.

To those who have not stepped into additive manufacturing, get involved as soon as possible. This is for the benefit of your company. When the new innovations come out, you want to be ready to take advantage of them immediately, and that takes knowledge.

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.