Who Nurtures the Irrational Belief

that Law-Abiding Citizens Protecting their Families Increase Crime?

Click to Expand

Registered guns can be confiscated!

Why do Socialists insist on gun control and, eventually, gun bans? The National Socialist Workers party (Nazi party) under Adolf Hitler imposed a gun ban, confiscated all registered guns, and then slaughtered the unarmed Jews as well as gays, Roma (Gypsies), and the physically and mentally disabled.

Nazi is the well-known abbreviation for the NAtional soZIalistische deutsche arbeiter partei - which literally translates as the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

"If I could've gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them -- Mr. and Mrs. America turn 'em all in -- I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here."

1. Do gun bans decrease or increase violent crime?

Click to Enlarge

Gun-free Zone - that should give me at least twenty minutes to shoot up the place.

If you believe that gun-free zones are a good idea, then how does stopping law-abiding citizens from protecting their families decrease crime? How do you trace, step by step, from start to finish, the causal path from the ban on guns to the decrease in violent crime that you believe it produces?

The main-stream media print emotional reports pretending that shooting sprees in gun-free zones prove that gun bans decrease crime! But this is simply not true, real proof needs real evidence - not just tear-jerking stories - and there's none. The evidence overwhelmingly proves both that gun bans increase the slaughter (all ) as well as easier access to guns decreases crime.

2. No massacres before the Gun Free School Zone Act

Although there were no - ZERO - school massacres before it was passed in 1990, Republican President Bush still signed Democrat Joe Biden's Gun Free School Zone Act. Yet gun-control advocates ignore the inconvenient truth that ensuring schools, movie theaters and churches are free of responsibly-held guns simply makes them massacre zones which attract mentally disturbed killers.

"If two crazy hoodlums can walk into a 'gun-free' zone, and police are incapable of defending the children, why would anyone want to make it harder for law-abiding adults to defend themselves and others?"

Liberal Alan Berg, an outspoken Denver talk-show host, used to enjoy provoking his listeners. Berg tried to obtain a firearms permit when he received death threats from a violent clique, but the police refused. He was murdered in a hail of machine-gun fire soon after. See Stephen Singular's book: Talked to Death, the Life and Murder of Alan Berg.

Ohio Democrat State Rep. Reverend Michael DeBose was a committed opponent of Right to Carry laws - until he was attacked by gun-wielding criminals. He'd twice voted against Ohio's concealed carry laws and the experience immediately changed his mind:

"I was wrong, I'm going to get a permit and so is my wife. I've changed my mind. You need a way to protect yourself and your family.
If more people were packing guns, it might serve as a deterrent."

Yet gullible people assume that because they obey gun controls laws, criminals also obey gun control laws and therefore such laws protect the innocent. Their minds refuse to accept that their thinking might be wrong - despite the overwhelming and compelling evidence that gun control can get you murdered.

It's not that he doesn't understand that defensive gun uses save hundreds of thousands responsible citizens from violent attack each year - that's one of the findings of gun control advocate Democratic past President Obama's CDC report. all

He also know that violent criminals fear being injured by their prey. Surveys of police officers and incarcerated felons prove that fear of the unknown or known gun carrier - the risk of being injured - "has an immediate effect on reducing violent criminal activity."

He doesn't profit from crime, yet is he keeping his eye on the ball? So we asked: What are we missing? But he didn't answer this question, just as he declined to give reasons for refusing to Discourage his Criminals and reduce his high and increasing robbery rate. Is he taking the 5th? As police chief, he must have a reason for his inaction, which leaves just one question:

How does anyone - except those who profit from crime in some way - benefit from refusing to investigate and implement an evidence-based policy so well proven to decrease violent crime?

If it were true that fewer guns in law-abiding hands cause less crime, then America should disarm the police as well as all armed guards - it would cause less crime! Democrats as well as dictators use such irrational nonsense to justify disarming their citizens. But who wants you to believe this untruth?

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

- Adolf Hitler, Nazi (from NAtional soZIalistische deutsche arbeiter partei, the National Socialist German Workers Party) Dictator, started World War II, slaughtered millions in the Holocaust.

Some people believe there's SAFETY IN NUMBERS. They want you to believe it simply because they do. They believe the common fallacy which holds that if some people - important people - say something, then it must be true. But which of those many different opinions do you believe?

Others are so SURE THEY'RE RIGHT that their mind is closed to the compelling evidence proving that more guns in responsible hands reduces crime. Last but not least,

CRIMINALS and those who benefit from crime do NOT want their prey - YOU - armed...

Beware, many politicians and people ignore the truth and tell you outright lies. President Bush raised taxes after saying "Read my lips, no new taxes" and President Obama promised "if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan." They rely on the dubious accuracy of ObamaCare's Professor Gruber who famously said "the American people are too stupid to understand the difference."

Food for Thought

Click to Expand

Large Caption

"With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option. You can beg for mercy from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back; but are you prepared?

"Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so you can defend yourself until we get there. You have a duty to protect yourself and your family."

Asked in 1850 what advice would Douglass give to escaped blacks who feared being enslaved, he replied: "A good revolver, a steady hand, and a determination to shoot down any man attempting to kidnap" them.

– Frederick Douglass (1818-1895) Former slave, African-American social reformer, diplomat, leader of the abolitionist movement, known for his dazzling oratory and incisive antislavery writings. Strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment and your right to defend yourself and your family with a firearm.

"In the last few years, the very idea of telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth is dredged up only as a final resort when the alternative options of deception, threat and bribery have all been exhausted."

- Michael Musto, Italian American journalist, former columnist for The Village Voice and theater critic for the Columbia Spectator

Click to Expand

Large Caption

Average deaths in a shooting rampage when stopped by police: 14.3. But average deaths when stopped by civilians: far less - just 2.3.

So discourage violent criminals and terrorists from attacking your people. Encourage your qualified, law-abiding citizens to be able to defend themselves, their family and their property. Both concealed carry as well as the discretionary ordinance are entirely optional - there's no penalty and they're exempt from complying if they object for any reason at all!

Despite media misunderstanding and much misrepresentation, Universal Gun Ownership is not coercive, it's neither Mandatory Gun Ownership nor Compulsory Gun Ownership. It's simply a choice to be prepared to defend themselves and their loved ones from a violent criminal in advance...