Which browser is better for Scholarship Searches? Bing vs. Google vs. Yahoo. A professional report on browsing for scholarships, and searching for financial-aid. This report is a must for students, parents, and educators searching for financial-aid.
Please feel free to conduct scholarship searches for the latest scholarships, grants, and financial-aid for moms, mothers, working adults, and students. Also, feel free to review this article concerning the A professional report: Best Scholarship Search Engines for scholarships and financial-aid

Scholarship searches may also be conducted for free by browsing our inventory of the latest scholarship, grants, and financial-aid selections for U.S. residents, as well as scholarships, grants, for moms, women, and working adults.

We encourage our International student fans to use our free scholarship search services, and to review our latest scholarship, grants, and financial-aid selection for International students. We welcome scholarship inquiries from Africa, Latin-American, European, Asian, and other countries.

Please review our latest scholarship, grants, and financial-aid selection for students or adults who have a unique talent in a skill, sport, or discipline.

Moms, women, and students can search for scholarships with our online
Scholarship Watch newsletter blog for new scholarship sources and information about scholarships, grants, and financial-aid.

52 Amazing Scholarships
for HS Seniors

Scholarship Keys

Apply for hundreds of 2017 Scholarships and Grants!

Free Registration for U.S.A. students

Please Donate to the Student Victim Fund

Teachers are assaulting students at record numbers. Many of these convicted teachers are either sentenced to No Jail time or very little jail time. Even Teachers merely accused of sexual assault are retaining their positions.

Mission of the Student Victim Fund

Unfortunately, there is no legal requirement for schools or courts to help the students that were victimized. Oftentimes, students who were traumatized or victimized must hire expensive attorneys or either just settle for being a victim.

The mission of this fund is to raise funds for victims, raise awareness of this crisis, and reward students, and parents, and others, who help expose teacher predators. Students and parents should be empowered to Take Back the Classroom!

Scholarship searches: Ranking Browsers for Effectiveness of Scholarship Searches. All browsers are not the same when searching for scholarships, grants, and financial-aid. Browsers differ just like engines, houses, and software differ.

Many people believe that Google is be a great over-all search engine. However, can Google quickly index new scholarship content for a student, adult, or collegian seeking the latest scholarships, grants, and financial-aid information?

By the same token, we know that Bing has invested heavily in search engine technology. Can a student that uses Bing to find scholarships, grants, and financial-aid be successful in searching?

Sign-Up for a Survey. Get paid today!

Which browser is better for Scholarship Searches? Bing vs. Google.

Which browser is better for Scholarship Searches? Bing vs. Google. A professional report on browsing for scholarships, and searching for financial-aid.

This is a professional report comparing the ability and/or inability of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and major search engines to quickly locate and index fresh and valuable scholarship content. In conducting this report, it is clear that millions of students are still conducting scholarship searches using antiquated scholarship search engines that have not kept pace with technology. Worst yet, the inferior scholarship search engines do not keep pace with, and cannot even locate quality scholarship content!!

We rate scholarship search engines a similar way that we rate scholarship search servics: We rate scholarship search sngines by the ability of these scholarship search engines to find, and index, quality scholarship content.

More than 95 percent of all scholarship applicants conduct scholarship searches via scholarship search engines via either desktop devices or mobile devices. The other 5% have parents that are extremely rich. This article is aimed at the 95% of Americans, and Europeans, who use search engines to find scholarships, grants, and financial-aid. Thank you for reading this article and please do not hesitate to submit your suggestions or replies via our Scholarship Watch blog.

Not all scholarship searches by scholarship search engines are the same.

In conducting our scholarship search for financial-aid and scholarships, we quickly realize that not all scholarship search engines are the same. Ineffective scholarship search engines yield entirely different scholarship search results as compared to effective scholarship search engines. Scholarship searches using the Bing scholarship search engine yield different results than scholarship searches using Google. Likewise, scholarship searches on the Ask scholarship search engine yield different results than on Yahoo!, etc.

We tested Bing three months ago, and Bing failed nearly every parameter in locating and indexing the scholarships,grants, and financial-aid options sponsored by National Academy of American Scholars despite these pages using flawless search engine optimization techniques, and despite passing Bing's own webmaster tools for SEO indexing.

The critical flaw for Bing is that a Microsoft Bing scholarship search yields many results but the quality of the results may not be too effective. We judged Bing, and tested Bing on various computers and Internet Explorer, along with various pahrases, as well as different browsers.

When the tests took place several months ago, Bing was so dismal that the search engine couldn't find a scholarship awarded to Bill Gates himself if one was sponsored and issued by National Academy of American Scholars.

Many of the scholarship search results on Bing were outdated, useless, and even irrelevant.

Given the shocking failure of the Bing Scholarship Search engine to locate, and index fresh scholarship content, such failure begged the obvious question, why? We asked 'Why can't the Bing scholarship search service locate and index each and every scholarship link on the NAAS.ORG website, in particular'? At the time of our initial tests, we concluded (rightly or wrongly) that either the Bing scholarship search service is a huge flopping failure, a gigantic fraud, or Bing was deliberately censoring its scholarship search engine results much like Verizon Wireless has used its services in a clandestine spying campaign against innocent Americans.

Heading into October of 2015, Bing appears to have cleaned up its Bing search engine. Now, students, educators, and moms, are finding more of our fresh scholarship content indexed by the Bing search engine.

Suspicions about Chinese Scholarship Searches
Comparisons to Verizon

Chinese scholarship search engines, by comparison, are already known to impose censorship on its users who search for scholarships on websites that are critical of China. For example, China may have the world's largest population, but the Chinese are subject to the greatest array of censorship options, including scholarship searches.

Students seeking scholarships, grants, and financial-aid via censored scholarship searches are asking this intelligent question: How is it possible for one scholarship sponsor to have more than 50 pages ranked #1 on Google and other scholarship search engines but the same scholarship sponsor and the same scholarship pages are NOT even ranked on a censored scholarship search engine?

Although Google Chrome held the lead for much of the summer, the Fall of 2015 has seen Google Chrome slip. Some webmasters believed that the slip was a result of Google experimenting with new features or testing out the effectiveness of its search products while only displaying limited data to critics or publishers. However, this scholarship search engine flaw has extended itself to more than 30 days.

Google Inc. is hurting. Questions arise about whether or not their are critical flaws in its scholarship search engine technology. Numerous webmasters have voiced their concern about Google scholarship engine search ability as recently as October 31st, 2015. The ability of Google to even index websites with a history as long as 10 years or more is even in question.

Students, moms, mothers and educators should therefore consider using the Bing search service as a worthy option while searching for scholarships, grants, and financial-aid.

Three (3) Key Criteria to Judge Scholarship Searches on a Scholarship Search Engine

As a scholarship applicant using a scholarship search engine, what is the first criteria that you should be looking for in a scholarship search engine? I would think that you would be more concerned about the 'pure' scholarship search results that are not influenced by paid advertisement placments. Next, you should be looking for the clear ability to distinguisg between a paid advertisement vs. an organic (pure) scholarship search result for scholarships. Third, and lastly, you should be looking for a correlation between quality scholarship search engine results vs. computer generated scholarship search engine results produced by clever search engine optimization results or software tools used by the scholarship search engines.

Always seek to avoid low-ranked scholarship search engines that do not yield quality scholarship search results. Virtually every would-be scholarship applicant searching for scholarships, grants, or financial-aid is going to use either or all of the main scholarship search engines: Bing, Yahoo, Google, Ask, or AOL. This report helps to decode which scholarship search engines that scholarship applicants should concentrate on to maximize your scholarship searches and minimize your valuable time.

Are you missing out on valuable scholarship opportunities when you use an inferior scholarship search engine or using scholarship searches without key scholarship phrases? Sure, you are. This brief report contains a table of the best scholarship search engines that will yield the best scholarship search results. There is no need in wasting your time using scholarship search engines that are pathetic, unreliable, and that do not yield quality, up-to-date scholarship content.

For optimum scholarship search results, as well as viewing and placement of scholarships, grants, and financial-aid listings, and correct orientation of the various graphics, videos, css, and plug-ins, associated with scholarship, grant, and financial-aid listings, we recommended that users utilize the browsers below in the order presented.

Scholarship searches: Key technical features of how to use scholarship searches and rank scholarship search engines

First, let us look at the features that we are looking for in a scholarship search engine. The table below is intended to summarize key features that are best suited for optimum experience in searching for scholarships, grants, and financial-aid. Don't let a bad scholarship search engine stop you from finding the scholarship or grant that you need.

Please review these primary characteristics that any top-notch scholarship search engine should have when searching for scholarships, grants, and financial-aid:

The best scholarship search engines produce 'pure' scholarship search results that are not influenced by paid advertisement placments;

The best scholarship search engines clearly distinguish between a paid advertisement vs. an organic (pure) scholarship search result for scholarships;

The best scholarship search engines incoporate a mobile scholarship search engine algorithm that detects if a website has mobile version of its searched scholarship keywords and adjusts the scholarship search hierarchy accordingly if scholarship sponsors have no correspondending mobile landing page. For example, Scholarships.Com ranks high in many scholarship search engine results, but the same search service often lacks a correponding mobile page for its scholarship listings. This defect has not resulted in scholarships.com being penalized.

Bing (U.S. scholarship search engine) The Microsoft Bing Scholarship Search engine has shown the greatest progress since our last report. ne of 2015, but still lags behind Google in total indexed scholarship content of the NAAS.ORG website. We last reported that the Bing scholarship search service was the most suspicious, but since that time Bing has improved. We have tested Bing Scholarship searches on more than 20 different computers, and the results are consistent. We recommend that students use the Bing scholarship search engine when searching for scholarship content.

Grade: A

Google, Inc. (U.S. scholarship search engine)Google Inc has lost its lead in indexed scholarship content. Bing is the new leader. Google can't even find "scholarship programs", "Nevada Scholarships", "Laura Whitehurst", and numerous other pages and original content produced by our Scholarship Blog, and publishers. Also, the Google Chrome browser has slipped in its ability to quickly index our constant updates to our Scholarship Blog, and other scholarship content. The key for any scholarship search engine is can it produce scholarship searches that index scholarships, grants, and financial-aid links sponsored by National Academy of American Scholars? Also, Google appears to be wedded to scholarships.com; a search service that criticized by CBS News as producing irrelevant scholarship matches.

Baidu (Chinese Scholarship Search engine)Scholarship searches using the Baidu Scholarship Search engine cannot be relied upon because the scholarship results are filtered, disrupted, and manipulated by the Chinese government. Due to the technical limitations of the Baidu Scholarship Search engine, we do not have at least 30 scholarship links ranked #1 on their scholarship search engine. This means that students are missing more than 30 pages of fresh and relevant scholarship content. However, the Baidu scholarship search engine has indexed our scholarship pages.

Grade: D

Yandex (Russian Scholarship Search engine)Scholarships searches conducted on this scholarship search engine did not yield very many quality scholarship results. Due to the technical limitations of the Yandex Scholarship Search engine, we do not have at least 30 scholarship links ranked #1 on their scholarship search engine. This means that students are missing more than 30 pages of fresh and relevant scholarship content. However, the Yandex scholarship search engine has indexed our scholarship pages.

Grade: F

Yahoo! (U.S. scholarship search engine)Scholarships searches conducted on this scholarship search engine did not yield very many quality scholarship results. Due to the technical limitations of the Yahoo Scholarship Search engine, we do not have at least 30 scholarship links ranked #1 on their scholarship search engine. This means that students are missing more than 30 pages of fresh and relevant scholarship content. However, the Yahoo scholarship search engine has indexed our scholarship pages.

Grade: D

Lycos (U.S. scholarship search engine)Scholarships searches conducted on this scholarship search engine did not yield very many quality scholarship results. Due to the technical limitations of the Lycos Scholarship Search engine, we do not have at least 30 scholarship links ranked #1 on their scholarship search engine. This means that students are missing more than 30 pages of fresh and relevant scholarship content. However, the Yandex scholarship search engine has indexed our scholarship pages.

Grade: D

Best and Worst Scholarship Search engines for Scholarships, and Financial-Aid

Scholarship searches: Key Tests for all Scholarship Search Engines

A legitimate scholarship search engine must be able to find unique, fresh, and engaging scholarship content. Any group of engineers can produce the equivalent of the Hello World of a Scholarship search engine. Too many companies that have are seeking to create or maintain their scholarship search engines have produced nothing more than basic programming code that even a teenager can produce in a half-hour.

Legitimate scholarship search engines must be able to index, and rank on page#1 of their scholarship search results the following NAAS.ORG pages based upon the associated scholarship phrases. In other words, when searching for fresh scholarships, grants, and financial-aid content, does a scholarship search engine include our content on page #1? If fresh, unique, and engaging scholarship content such as ours is not on page #1 then it is obvious that the scholarship search engine is either not working properly, or is not serving the best interests of moms, women, and students that are searching for scholarships, grants, and financial-aid.

We deserve the #1 ranking not only on Google, but every scholarship search engine, including Bing, for the scholarship search phrases below. Look for the following naas.org scholarship links to be ranked on the major scholarship search engines. If our pages are not ranked on a particular scholarship search engine then switch your scholarship searches to another scholarship search engine.

A scholarship search engine can easliy be tested by simply using their own scholarship search engine with certain scholarship search phrases. If you do not believe the low scholarship search grades we have assigned for certain scholarship search engines, then feel free to test the scholarship search engines for yourself. You will see that both Bing and Yahoo are failure as scholarship search engines, and how they rank and index old scholarship content rather than fresh and unique scholarship content.

What may appear ranked on Google, may not even be ranked on Yahoo or Bing. The acquisition of Yahoo by Bing has not helped the Yahoo scholarship search services. In fact, the failures of the Bing scholarship search service have simply been duplicated on Yahoo!

Although both Yahoo and Bing characterize themselves as search engines, the fact is that much of the content that appears on page #1 of their scholarship search results (and most likely other content) is old, ou-dated, and in some cases has not been updated in years. The failure of both the Bing and Yahoo! search engines to locate, index, and rank highly unique and engaging scholarship content is a major reason why students, moms, and mothers, should not being using these search services.

Although the Bing scholarship search service has made a half-hearted method during the past 3 months to improve its dismal scholarship searches, both the Yahoo and Bing scholarship searches have consistently failed to locate, rank, and index prized scholarship content published by National Academy of American Scholars.

It appears that Bing and Yahoo have thrown in the towel against Google, and have therefore quit even searching for new content, and have quit placing new and fresh content on page#1. Consumers should therefore 'quit' using their scholarship searches and consumer searches. If something doesn't work then why use it? Why use either the Bing Scholarship Search service or the Yahoo! scholarship search if either simply cannot find scholarship content originating from the NAAS.ORG website or our Scholarship Blog?

Exam tests that prove the Effectiveness of Scholarship Search Engines.

For example, study Table 2.0 below. Using the key phrases in Table 2.0 for the respective scholarship search engines in Table 1.0, you may simply test the effectiveness of the scholarship search engine results. Each scholarship search should produce a definite scholarship search engine result. If our links do not appear on ranked on page #1 or page#2 then scholarship search engine may also be missing other relevant scholarship search content. The grades for the scholarship search engines are 2 points for a successful scholarship search result on page #1, and 1 point for scholarship search results that appear on page #2.

We will grade each scholarship search engine for various scholarship search phrases each month.

Consumer Judging of Scholarship Searches: Who is better? Updated for (Table 2.0)