Another Slice of Pizzagate

Just your ordinary family pizzeria owner James Alefantis (right) of Comet Ping Pong

2,764 words

Any discussion of the plausibility of conspiracies has to start with MK Ultra—one of the most bizarre “conspiracy theories” that turned out, by all official accounts, to be completely and entirely true. MK Ultra was a CIA program that began in the early 1950s and operated at full scale from then until around 1964. The program was reduced in scope in 1964 and then again in 1967 and wasn’t officially put to an end until 1973 [1]—although 14-year CIA veteran Victor Marchetti claimed in 1977 that the CIA’s assurances that it had stopped the program were nothing more than a “cover story.”

It is unambiguously acknowledged that the MK Ultra program was extremely illegal, as it involved performing covert tests and experiments altering the mental state and brain functioning of unwitting, non-consenting, oblivious U.S. citizens. These tests involved everything from hypnosis and sensory deprivation, to verbal and sexual abuse and other forms of psychological torture,[2][3] to giving potent psychoactive drugs like LSD to unsuspecting U.S. citizens. On the Senate floor in 1977, Senator Ted Kennedy explained that the Deputy Director of the CIA had revealed to the Church Committee (the arm of Congress tasked with investigating the scandal in 1975) that these kinds of tests had been performed “at all social levels, high and low, [to] native Americans and foreign.”

Again, all of this is universally acknowledged in the public record: the U.S. General Accounting Office reported in 1984 that “the program consisted of . . . drug testing and other studies on unwitting human subjects.” Forty-four colleges and universities, fifteen pharmaceutical companies, twelve hospitals, and three prisons are also known to have participated, and yet despite how many people were involved in these severe abuses of the public trust, it took more than twenty years for any information to actually surface about what was happening.[5] These institutions are also known to have collaborated in abusive and nonconsensual experimentation with drugs like LSD on children, including children with schizophrenia and autism. As Dr. Jeffrey Kaye’s article notes, “[R]eading the professional papers of such scientists and researchers . . . [n]ot once do any of these papers express concern for the subjects at hand or denote any pangs of conscience at violating any oaths, codes and statutes regarding patient rights, human rights or human dignity.”

And yet, even now, we still don’t have anything close to the full story. What we know about MK Ultra is disturbing enough. But most of the records describing what MK Ultra entailed were destroyed before they could even be accessed by Congressional investigation. A cache of 20,000 documents incorrectly stored in a financial records building is all that survived destruction by CIA Director Richard Helms after the Watergate scandal broke. These documents allowed the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission to uncover what it did.

Thus, to this day, we only know about some 150 individually funded sub-projects of MK Ultra.[4] The official records of the investigation, once again, acknowledge that only a fraction of what the project actually entailed is known: Chapter 3, part 4: “Supreme Court Dissents Invoke the Nuremberg Code: CIA and DOD Human Subjects Research Scandals” of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments Final Report acknowledges clearly that “. . . most of the MK–ULTRA records were deliberately destroyed . . .”

Furthermore, the established record even strongly suggests that murder was used as a means to keep the record clean.

One of several deaths universally known to have been associated with Project MK Ultra was that of Frank Olson, a U.S. Army biochemist and biological weapons researcher. According to the earliest account, Olson supposedly committed suicide by jumping from a window on the thirteenth story of a New York City hotel as a result of a psychotic episode. The CIA doctor assigned to monitor Olson claimed to have been asleep in another bed in the hotel when Olson’s suicide occurred. However, the CIA’s own internal investigation found that CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb, head of the MK Ultra project, had experimented on Olson with LSD without Olson’s prior knowledge and that this had directly led to his death; and in 1975 the Olson family received a $750,000 settlement along with apologies from President Ford and CIA Director Colby over the irresponsible administration of LSD.

But the Olson family disputes that even this is the full story. They claim that Olson was murdered because, especially after his own experience of being given LSD without foreknowledge, he became a security risk because he might reveal information about what MK Ultra had involved. Just a few days before his death, he had quit his position as acting chief of the Special Operations Division at Detrick, Maryland, claiming a growing crisis of conscience over his work. And forensic analysis of Olson’s body after it was exhumed in 1994 revealed cranial injuries which indicated that Olson had in fact been knocked unconscious before exiting that window on the thirteenth floor[4]; in 2012, the Olson family filed suit for the wrongful death of Frank Olson again.

Drugs were used primarily as an aid to interrogations, but MKUltra/MKDelta materials were also used for harassment, discrediting, or disabling purposes.

So why do I bring all of this up? Am I just trying to make the argument that if one conspiracy theory is true, all the others must be, too?

Not at all. Of course, case histories of bizarre government crimes and coverups makes our suspicions about Pizzagate more plausible. But there is a much more relevant reason for discussing MK Ultra here. People are asking where are the victims of the sort of high-level sex trafficking that #Pizzagate alleges. This is part of the answer.

Cathy O’Brien has claimed to have been a childhood victim of MK Ultra experiments for years.

And you can hear her testimony to The Granada Forum in 1996 right here:

At that time, it was 1978, and it was determined that I had endured sufficient trauma to carry out my first trial run operation. An enormous quantity of cocaine had been flown in on one of these operations and I was to deliver it into the neighboring state of Arkansas. By that time, Bill Clinton’s drug operation was in full swing. He was governor of Arkansas.

I delivered this cocaine to a remote airport on Ouachita Forest, which I have since identified as Mena Airport. I also delivered a little packet of information and a small quantity of cocaine, a personal stash from J. Bennett Johnston to Bill Clinton. I delivered it to Bill Clinton and he cut out two lines of the coke, and he did inhale . . .

That certainly wasn’t the only time I saw Bill Clinton using cocaine.

My sexual experience with Bill Clinton was extremely limited . . . my experience was much more prevalent with Hillary Clinton because Hillary is also bisexual, leaning more towards a homosexual. It was she who accessed my sex programming to fulfill her perversions.

While some are skeptical of her account on the grounds that most of her claims can’t be verified independently,

We know for a fact that children were exploited by high-ranking officials, doctors, etc. during the era of MK Ultra.

We know that most of the documents revealing the full depths of what MK Ultra programs involved were permanently destroyed.

We also know that childhood abuse of a nature this extreme leaves people emotionally and psychologically unstable.

Thus, were any of the children abused by these programs to come forward, an emotionally disturbed individual making unverifiable claims is exactly what it would look like. Whether you find her claims plausible enough to deserve investigation or not, they do refute the suggestion that there hasn’t been anyone claiming to have been the victim of a sex ring of the sort alleged in Pizzagate.

And again, I think when we look at things lying in plain sight, right in the official public record, the possibility doesn’t sound so implausible. Many have now heard that Hillary Clinton laughed gleefully over securing the acquittal of a 41-year-old man who she thought was guilty of raping a 12-year-old girl before sending her to the hospital in a coma. The victim is still clearly emotionally scarred by the experience: “Hillary Clinton put me through Hell . . . You lied on me, and you’re supposed to be for women? You call that ‘for women,’ what you did to me? I hear you on tape, laughing!”

The only defense I’ve ever heard for this behavior is that it’s “normal for a lawyer.” I doubt that. But it is definitely normal for a sociopath. I think many lawyers, no matter how much pride they take in their ability, would at least feel conflicted if they truly knew they’d helped secure a guilty individual’s freedom. Only a sociopath would express unmitigated glee over it without the slightest pang of conscience shining through.

But even if this is “normal for a lawyer,” maybe that’s because the legal profession attracts sociopaths, which is why we keep finding so many lawyers in high-level sex rings, like this one just uncovered in Norway last month.

Either way . . . add that to Hillary calling Gennifer Flowers (with whom Bill Clinton later admitted to having an affair) a “trailer trash failed cabaret singer” in attempt to discredit her true story, or the story of Hillary allegedly intimidating Juanita Broaddrick, Bill’s alleged rape victim, or any of the many other well-established stories of Hillary’s enabling Bill’s abuse of women (as this article notes, the Clinton campaign reportedly spent $100,000 on private detective work in 1992 to try to discredit often true stories brought forward by women who’d had sexual encounters with Bill).

I’ll close with a few notes related to discussions I’ve seen following the last #Pizzagate article.

First, in my “Pizzagate” article, I noted that Reddit shut down the r/pizzagate subreddit while keeping r/pedofriends. Since then, I’ve discovered that there is documented evidence http://archive.is/lJKGJ :

That Reddit was pressured by Twitter to shut down the r/pizzagate and r/Operation_Berenstain subreddits;

even as it has censored not only conservative figures and people within the Alternative Right, but

in fact, has even banned the accounts of people who have called attention to the existence of that very child pornography on Twitter.

In other words, in response to child pornography being called out, Twitter has banned the people calling attention to it rather than banning the child pornography itself.

Second, some readers wondered how we know that the photos taken from James Alefantis’ Instagram account are real. The answer is that, although they’ve been scrubbed, people following this story archived the images on archive.is, a site that keeps a permanent record of web pages in their current status. As you can see there, that page links straight to Alefantis’ account at https://www.instagram.com/jimmycomet/, and that isn’t something that the archiving website allows you to fake: the links contained in that archive are the links that were present on the original page at the time that it was archived, so there is no question that this is the image posted on Alefantis’ account. You can even find the other original records by simply searching archive.is for terms like “Alefantis.”

Third, here’s another interesting detail on Alefantis’ account. Take a look at Alefantis’ profile picture. It just so happens to be a bust of Antinous. Specifically, you can verify here that it is a picture of the bust held at the Museo del Prado in Madrid, next to the same exact window). Who was Antinous?

Antinous was a Greek boy who was involved in a pederastic relationship with the Roman Emperor Hadrian. As the author Royston Lambert describes it, “The way that Hadrian took the boy on his travels, kept close to him at moments of spiritual, moral or physical exaltation, and, after his death, surrounded himself with his images, shows an obsessive craving for his presence, a mystical-religious need for his companionship.” The remaining sculptures of Antinous, Lambert tells us, are “without doubt one of the most elevated and ideal monuments to pederastic love of the whole ancient world.”

Fourth, if you search “Podesta Madeleine McCann,” there are a number of coincidences suggesting the possibility the brothers could have had a role in her disappearance. The key point is that Clement Freud, the convicted pedophile with whom the brothers remained close friends, has a mansion less than half a mile away from where the young girl disappeared in Portugal. We know that the Podesta brothers traveled there on occasion, there’s reason to think they may have been there during the month she disappeared, and the police sketches look disturbingly identical to both John and Tony Podesta—see here for a side-by-side comparison. While the police put out these two images on the assumption that they were two different people, it is entirely possible that two different witnesses could have separately only seen one man, although more than one man was involved. Also see this article, which demonstrates that it’s public knowledge that Clement Freud had contact with Madeleine McCann’s parents and again shows that while some of the evidence people are collecting in Pizzagate is Jesus-in-toast pareidolia and coincidence, at least some of it really is genuinely disturbing.

Fifth, some readers accused my opening article of partisanship for its focus on the Democratic Party, noting that Donald Trump has connections to Epstein as well.

Now, I want to say that I am in no way averse to discovering the possibility that Trump or individuals associated with him could be linked to events of this nature, and I would have no inclination to defend them if credible evidence should emerge. Furthermore, it has been claimed that the Trump campaign fired the son of his transition team’s national security adviser Michael Flynn for tweeting “Until #Pizzagate proven to be false, it’ll remain a story,” and if that was indeed the real reason for the firing, I’m not sure what to make of it.

However, it bears noting that Donald Trump did in fact ban Jeffrey Epstein from his Mar a Lago club before Epstein was ever even convicted of soliciting a child prostitute, over an incident where Epstein was claimed to have made inappropriate comments to an attendant’s daughter; meanwhile, after Virginia Roberts (a woman who claims to have spent years as Epstein’s sex slave and is only such claimant to have taken her defense public) admitted she didn’t recognize the woman who alleged she had been raped by Trump and Epstein, evidence emerged that the accusation was orchestrated by Norm Lubow, anti-Trump campaigner and former producer of the Jerry Springer TV show. Also interestingly enough, Trump has openly and publicly discussed Bill Clinton’s rides on Epstein’s Lolita Express, which at least suggests to me that Trump isn’t afraid of the story getting out. If I’m wrong, then I’m wrong. But I think it’s clear that I’m justified to put more focus on the far greater amount of circumstantial (and direct) evidence surrounding the Clintons.

Finally, as far as whether the previous article was “partisan” on the whole, note that Lawrence King who I discussed for his involvement in the Franklin Scandal in the 1980s, was the man chosen to sing the national anthem in the 1984 Republican convention, and was the leader of the Black Republican Congress. In the next entry to this series, I plan to discuss some historical cases, including the Franklin Scandal that King was at the center of, that once again demonstrate just how surprising the scale at which “cover-ups” of abuses of this nature really can take place. Events collected in the public record, just like Rotherham, that show how wrong assumptions like “Wouldn’t we expect their wives to come forward?” (I’m afraid not) or “Wouldn’t we expect X number of victims to have come forward by now?” can be.

Notes

1. Jo Thomas (3 Sep 1977). “C.I.A. Says It Found More Secret Papers on Behavior Control: Senate Panel Puts Off Hearing to Study Data Dozen Witnesses Said to Have Misled Inquiry C.I.A. Tells Of Finding Secret Data.” New York Times.

2. Otterman, Michael (2007). American Torture: From the Cold War to Abu Ghraib and Beyond. Melbourne University Publishing. p. 24.

3. McCoy, Alfred (2007). A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Macmillan. p. 29. ISBN 1429900687.

4. John D. Marks (1979), The Search for the ‘Manchurian Candidate’: The CIA and Mind Control: The Secret History of the Behavioral Sciences, Penguin Books Ltd.

5. Mills, Ami Chen (1991). CIA Off Campus: Building the Movement Against Agency Recruitment and Research (2nd ed.). Boston: South End Press. p. 38.

14 Comments

I recommend looking into the Presidio Naval Base scandal… there seems to be continually pedophile networks coming to light and then disappearing from public consciousness.

In looking at Podesta’s art, it reminds me of when I was art handling – there is a lot of contemporary high dollar art pedophilic and arguably Satanic/Luciferian in nature. I was in the back room of an art gallery in either Santa Monica or Hollywood and most of the art involved naked young boys, shirtless boys, surrealistic boys pissing, etc. It made me want to gtfo or kill the Jewy looking dudes who were running the place. The secular elite class in the US is extremely decadent to say the least

I think people can determine which lines of evidence and inquiry might be fruitful and which are a waste of time based on how the MSM treats the topic. Vox recently published the “hot dog” code, for example, which claims that “hot dog” means boys and other food items mean girls, and so on. People can infer, I think, that the hot dog table is disinfo or a major clearinghouse for elite message points like Vox would never have published it.

It’s clear from the MSM’s “debunkings” of pizza gate that the MSM does not want people to see pictures of the children that Alefantis and friends posted and made comments about. The mainstream “debunkings” never show the suspicious pictures. Alefantis claims that the picture of the little girl taped to the table in a bondage pose is his god daughter. Maybe that’s true; maybe it’s not. I don’t think a sociopath like Alefantis can be taken at face value.

What matters, however, is that given all the kinky sex talk and the lurid culture he cultivated around his pizza parlor for adults and around him personally no normal person is going to post a picture of a child like that in that context. To draw a parallel, how often do you find heterosexual swingers yucking it up about sex and orgies on their social media putting forth all kinds of suggestive comments about their sex habits and interspersing pictures of their kids in the middle of the banter?

It’s also weird that a US attorney in charge of prosecuting child abuse was hanging around Alefantis’s page. I mean, it is DC, so I can buy that he knows all kinds of people. Maybe it is a coincidence. It is, again, just very weird to find a man in charge of prosecuting child abuse hanging around Alefantis’s page rather than say a US attorney who does white collar crime or government corruption. The MSM hasn’t reported on this either.

So I think the way forward is to focus public attention on the pictures and the predilections of the people involved. This seems to be the area the MSM wants to avoid.

The irony of #Pizzagate is that the topic will be a gateway for many young people online to the dark side of Talmudic tradition and perverted DC power.
The bizarre intertwining of pizza imagery with child sacrifice is initially so absurd that one can’t help but lurk on r/conspiracy and /pol, and hopefully, Counter-Currents. The surreal pizza wrapper makes for an acceptable watercooler subject among normies.

What separates #Pizzagate from the “Satanic Panic” of the 1980s is the digitized mainstreaming of previously fringe “theories” like MK Ultra, Bohemian Grove, and the Illuminati shadow government. These are researched in the privacy of the home now, and do not require activated pursuit via print newsletter subscriptions.

Heck, MK Ultra was the inspiration for a Kristen Stewart teen movie titled ‘American Ultra.’ And Alex Jones’s decade-old Grove video, where he filmed a child-like effigy burnt in front of a massive Judaic owl, is as undeniable as George Soros’s puppeteering of the DNC. Kubrick’s ‘Eyes Wide Shut,’ which used a Rothschild residence as an exterior, also has quite the half-life among millennials. Comedian Sam Hyde had an Adult Swim show this year, while he tweeted Pizzagate developments, and mentioned Jewish conspiracies to the Observer.com (owned by Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-Shabbos-law).

One of the underused talking points in support of Pizzagate’s legitimacy, is the arrest of House Speaker Dennis “Denny” Hastert for boy-abuse. Not only is Hastert longtime pallies with Podesta, in a Wikileaks email, Podesta directly says Hastert should “vanish to a Japanese island,” regarding his sickening charges. How the media snuffed out the Hastert scandal was telling unto itself. It was like Sandusky, if he were one degree from the US president. And it was completely buried. Another talking point is Brock Pierce, a subject of the Pedowood doc ‘An Open Secret,” belonging to the Clinton and Bitcoin Foundations.

Pizzagate doesn’t seem to be losing momentum, and it feels as if the dam could finally break on elite global child trafficking. Anthony Weiner’s email cache remains in the hands of an FBI that is exceedingly in conflict with a globalist CIA. The face of Weiner, like David Brock and Alefantis, betrays a shaved rat in the limelight. These people can’t help themselves.

IMO, Pizzagate may represent the curdling of the hipster counterculture, as the Manson murders did for the hippies. Drugged out dark rooms of culture are easy, mushy targets for subversion and deflection. And evil. But this time, the whole set of dominos (no pun) may fall, and with it, the public perception crafted by 50-years of goy-vision. A Clinton staffer “joked” in a Wikileaks email about “sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch.” It’s time for us to enjoy Moloch choking on cheese crust and collapsing. Please clap, Jeb, Hillary and family.

More relevant developments related to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton, and #Pizzagate:

In February 2011, Andrew Breitbart tweeted three times from his verified account and outed John Podesta by name, as being involved in child trafficking. The tweets remain visible on his posthumous account. Breitbart, of course, died suddenly and unexpectedly the next year.

In a newly recirculating post from 2015 on WashingtonExaminer.com, Hillary Clinton is tied to another pedo-related political scandal. For reference, the post is titled: “Hillary’s officials cut criticisms out of State Dept. reports”

An excerpt:

Another passage that was removed from the public report suggests officials in Clinton’s office may have protected an ambassador from a child abuse investigation.

“Sources reported that a senior ‘7th Floor’ Department official ordered [diplomatic security] to stop the investigation of an ambassador accused of pedophilia, and another such senior official had [diplomatic security] stop an investigation of an ambassador-designate,” the draft reads.

The seventh floor is the location of the secretary of state’s office, as well as the offices of the deputy secretary and the undersecretaries, according to the State Department’s website.

As for Trump: like a true Godfather, I think he wants to keep the Clintons in the dark about his further actions against them. Disciplining Flynn was probably necessary to prevent premature shots. After all, Trump is not president yet. If Breitbart really knew about Podesta (as some his 2011 tweets suggest, and his untimely death probably was no coincidence), Bannon does too, and then so does Trump, and it could be entirely possible they’re waiting for the right moment to blow this whole thing up. That certainly may be wishful thinking on my part. The idea sounds too good to be true, also that Trump might actually be clean enough to make this happen without getting himself hurt.

By the way, Youtube did a major cleansing of Pizzagate-Videos and sent warnings to uploaders. There is no doubt that a major cover-up is going on.

Informative article. I thought the police sketches of Madeline McCann’s abductors were the most tinfoil-ish evidence out there, until now. Looks plausible. I also tend to think the stuff about the business logos is pretty strong (assuming it’s verified).

Being of the opinion that one should be kind to animals and children I clicked on a couple of animal right sites and now my Facebook is inundated with horror stories (as someone said taking a drink from the internet is like taking a drink from a firehose) and between casual cruelty and what “scientists” do in the lab, I for one certainly believe MK Ultra and Pizzagate to be true.

MKUltra is so under-recognized. To the normie mind it means “Haha they gave LSD to soldiers lol”. It involved a whole swathe of really dark stuff, including something that wasn’t mentioned here – Psychic Driving. To quote from Donald Ewen Cameron’s Wikipedia page:

“He commuted from Albany to Montreal every week to work at McGill’s Allan Memorial Institute and was paid $69,000 from 1957 to 1964 to carry out MKUltra experiments there. In addition to LSD, he experimented with various paralytic drugs and electroconvulsive therapy at thirty to forty times the normal power.[24] His “driving” experiments consisted of putting a subject into a drug-induced coma for weeks at a time (up to three months in one case) while playing tape loops of noise or simple statements. These experiments were typically carried out on patients who had entered the institute for minor problems such as anxiety disorders and postnatal depression; many suffered permanent debilitation after these treatments.[25] Such consequences included incontinence, amnesia, forgetting how to talk, forgetting their parents, and thinking their interrogators were their parents.”

I’ve yet to see any hard evidence for Project Monarch the way that there is for MKUltra though. An excellent read on MKUltra that I’d highly recommend is ‘The Search for the “Manchurian Candidate” – the CIA and Mind Control’ by John Marks.

On the subject of struggling to distinguish the genuinely delusional from those who simply have lived a life of abnormality, he says this (pg 111)

“While I was doing the research for this book, many people approached me claiming to be victims of CIA drugging plots. Although I listened carefully to all and realized that some might be authentic victims, I had no way of distinguishing between someone acting strangely and someone made to act strangely. Perhaps the most insidious aspect of this whole technique is that anyone blaming is aberrant behavior on a drug or the CIA gets labelled as a hopeless paranoid and his case thrown into the crank file. There is no better cover than operating on the edge of madness.

One leftist professor in a Latin American university who had opposed the CIA says that he was working alone in his office one day in 1974 when a strange woman entered and jabbed his wrist with a pin stuck in a small round object. Almost immediately, he became irrational, broke glasses and threw water in his colleagues’ faces. He says his students spotted an ambulance waiting for him out front. They spirited him out the back door and took him home, where he ‘tripped’ (or had psychotic episodes) for more than a week. He calls the experience a mix of “heaven and hell,” and he shudders at the thought he might have spent the time in a hospital with “nurses and straitjackets.” Although he eventually returned to his post at the university, he states it took him several years to recover the credibility he lost the day he “went crazy at the office.”. If the CIA was involved, it had neutralized a foe”

This may seem a little far fetched, but drugs capable of mimicking this effect exist. EA-3167 (CAS # 26758-53-2) is a potent hallucinogenic deliriant that lasts between 5-10 days and requires a dosage of only 200 micrograms to be injected. It was synthesised in the 60s, but wikipedia assures us that it was never manufactured in bulk.

>[Clement Freud] had cooked a watercress and egg salad followed by a chicken and mushroom risotto which was “the best risotto we’ve ever tasted before or since”.

Isn’t John Podesta known for making risotto too? The coincidences are killing me.

Anyway, your two articles are by far the best analyses of the facts surrounding pizzagate. I don’t buy the e-mail codes and symbol stuff, but the instagram pics are powerful evidence that something wicked might be afoot.