I actually don't think you get the difference between 'Dame' and 'Lady'.

Dame = a title held in your own right - she was made a Dame for her own work and will hold that title forever more.

Lady - a style she takes because of who she is married to - a style she would lose on divorce.

That the wife of a KG of the Garter gives her a higher position in the Order of Precedence than a Dame in her own right is why Wikipedia (hardly a reliable source in many cases) refers to her as Lady as the later title but it also says that legally, on legal documents etc she is referred to as Dame Norma Major - because that it a title she holds in her own right, through her own efforts while Lady is merely the style of the wife of a knight.

I understand the difference between Dame and Lady.

But Norma Major holds these two titles. As Lady, even by courtesy, she has a higher precedence than the one she would have only as a Dame.

The point is that she holds two titles, and decided the be know as Dame, but she's still a Lady.

Norma Major has been created a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire and she is named as Dame Norma Major in legal documents. As the wife of a Knight of the Garter, she may use also the courtesy title of "Lady" as a prefix to her surname, provided she uses her husband’s surname. Although this title places her higher in the Order of Precedence than her Damehood, she prefers to use the style Dame Norma Major as she acquired this distinction in her own right.

William is still Wales in the military. It's another exception to the rules.

It's not really a "rule'. More like accepted practice for those with titles or royal styles. It is extremely common for Peers to use their titles as surnames when necessary or if they so desire with their close friends.

William has always used "William Wales" since he was in school and continues to use it in the Armed Forces. Even though "William Cambridge" would be correct now that he is a Duke, it doesn't matter what name he uses. Technically, he has no surname as HRH at birth.

or will he just continuing being HRH Prince Harry (and his wife will be HRH Princess Harry)?? (like Prince & Princess Michael) .........Princess Harry just sounds wrong....

He can't have Albany or Cumberland as they aren't extinct titles. The holders were deprived of those titles in 1917 under the Titles Deprivation Act but there are claimants who have the right to petition to have the titles restored. Until there are no living male-line descendents of these titles they aren't available for regrant. The Act included the right to petition for the restoration of the titles.

Currently the person who could petition for Cumberland is Ernst Augustus V, Prince of Hanover and his son is the heir apparent. There are other male line sons as well.

Currenty the person who could petition for Albany is Hubertus Prinz von Sachsen Coburg-Gotha and he too has a son and heir to that title should they decide to petition for its restoration.

Windsor is a non-starter - it was a special one -off title given to an ex-King and is probably in the back drawer for such an occasion in the future e.g. if William abdicates then Duke of Windsor (I can see William following the Dutch example and abdicating when he reaches about 75 and that would allow his heir to use Windsor as a new title for William as Cambridge would have merged with the Crown).

I would imagine though that unless Harry has left the military by then, he and his wife would still be considered part time royals and given time to adjust such as William and Kate had after they married.

__________________
“When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.”
― John Lennon

If the queen doesn't, they will gain the title when Charles is king anyways, as male line grandchildren of the monarch. As it is Will who will be king when his kids wed, it will stand to be seen how Harry's younger kids will be titled. His eldest will gain Harry's dukedome (if a son) when Harry dies. Harry's younger kids may very well just be left as Prince/Princess (like Prince Michael and Princess Alexandra) and not given a duchy on marriage. It may have been different IMO, if their grandfather was king when they wed.

I can see Duke and Duchess of Sussex. And their children will be Lord/Lady, and the eldest what ever Harry's Earl title is, until Charles is king IMO.

I love the royals, but I don't get all the details that they are about. Why would Harry/Henry's children not be Prince/ss? His cousins are, and his child will be 5th in line (until William and Kate have another)

I love the royals, but I don't get all the details that they are about. Why would Harry/Henry's children not be Prince/ss? His cousins are, and his child will be 5th in line (until William and Kate have another)

The 1917 LPs regarding princely titles states that the children of the monarch, the male-line grandchildren of the monarch, the eldest son of the heir apparent's eldest son, and the wives of the above will be HRH Prince(ss). Further LPs have been issued to grant the children of the then Princess Elizabeth, the DoE, and now all the children of William the title, but until Charles is king any children of Harry's are not covered under the current LPs.

Harry's children would be comparable to the children of the Kents and Gloucesters - male-line great-grandchildren of a monarch, at least until Charles becomes king.

The 1917 LPs regarding princely titles states that the children of the monarch, the male-line grandchildren of the monarch, the eldest son of the heir apparent's eldest son, and the wives of the above will be HRH Prince(ss). Further LPs have been issued to grant the children of the then Princess Elizabeth, the DoE, and now all the children of William the title, but until Charles is king any children of Harry's are not covered under the current LPs.

Harry's children would be comparable to the children of the Kents and Gloucesters - male-line great-grandchildren of a monarch, at least until Charles becomes king.

Oh I see, got it!

With regards to titles, If Harry gets Duke of Sussex, would he have 'more' as Kate hasCountess of Strathearn, Baroness Carrickfergus added on the end of her title.