Voting rights activist Bev Harris fears the mid-term elections may
have been thrown in order to quell suspicions about vote fraud in anticipation
of a major 2008 coup. Liberal blog sites are already naively telling
whistleblowers and "conspiracy theorists" to keep quiet now
that the left arm of the establishment, the Democrats, have re-emerged.

"I think it's gonna be interesting to see which election reform
groups decide that it's not such a bad problem after all now that they
have Democrats in there because I think that some of them are actually
closet partisans," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

"The issue here is not change in the last 24 hours - voting machines
can't be authenticated, they're not necessarily accurate, they're tamper
friendly - nothing has changed about that in 24 hours."

"We shouldn't really try to say well some Democrats are in there
so now it's OK - it's not."

However, that's exactly what a lot of left-leaning establishment types
are parroting, claiming a Democrat victory proves "American democracy
still works," and that questions about electronic voting machines
should be tossed aside.

Glenn Greenwald, an attorney and highly regarded liberal blogger, today
went on the attack against those who many in the establishment
left had previously allied with in order to take on the Neo-Cons.

"Chronic defeatists and conspiracy theorists — well-intentioned
though they may be — need to re-evaluate their defeatism and conspiracy
theories in light of this rather compelling evidence which undermines
them," states Greenwald, "Republicans don't possess the power
to dictate the outcome of elections with secret Diebold software. They
can't magically produce Osama bin Laden the day before the election."

Greenwald's naivety is rivaled only by his arrogance and we are already
beginning to have flashbacks to the Bill Clinton era, when liberals
associated their authority with the Democrats and defended their every
action without recourse.

Ludicrously, Greenwald claims that six years of repeated Bush administration
assaults on the Constitution, imperial jaunts that have killed and maimed
hundreds of thousands of innocents, the degradation of how America is
viewed abroad, and the very integrity of the country, has all been reversed
by the empowerment of a party rhetorically led by Nancy Pelosi, a pro-torture,
pro-war, mobbed-up establishment sycophant who has already
agreed to protect Bush and his cronies from criminal investigations.

"All of the hurdles and problems that are unquestionably present
and serious — a dysfunctional and corrupt national media, apathy
on the part of Americans, the potent use of propaganda by the Bush administration,
voter suppression and election fraud tactics, gerrymandering and fundraising
games — can all be overcome. They just were," smarts Greenwald.

Harris encouraged people to take a look at which Democrats got voted
in and what their stance was on the issues that were supposedly the
root of voter discontent in the first place.

"I keep seeing reports on how these are the people who everyone
can get along with, so what does that mean?"

Harris is absolutely right in identifying the fact that yesterday's
charade was nothing more than re-arranging deck chairs, and this is
proven again by the fact that likely speaker of the House Nancy
Pelosi has already vowed to protect Bush from criminal
impeachment and the two have agreed to work together on advancing common
cause agendas, such as the mass amnesty of illegal aliens that Bush
couldn't get through under a Republican controlled House, an issue even
Rush Limbaugh is now screaming bloody murder about.

Harris called for the temporary bias of favoritism for either the Republicans
or the Democrats to be set aside in favor of the pursuit of trustworthy
voting systems and the integrity of the electoral process in the long-term.
Indicating that she had received more substantive complaints about vote
fraud than in any other election, Harris said the possibility remained
strong that this election had been thrown in order to re-invest artificial
trust in electronic voting machines and stop the momentum of voting
rights activists.

"Supposing I was really wanting to make sure that I could control
elections through voting machines," said Harris, "I would
probably throw a fight now and then because right now we have so much
momentum going to get real change and then if you make it look like
'well there's nothing to look at here, move along,' then we won't get
it fixed by 2008."

Will liberals continue to frolic around totally oblivious to the fact
that the battle has just begun, or will they finally wake up and realize
that it takes more than the re-election of Team B to stop the juggernaut
of tyranny driven by both parties that has steamrollered America since
the assassination of JFK in November 1963?