The Cartographers’ Guild is a forum created by and for map makers and aficionados, a place where every aspect of cartography can be admired, examined, learned, and discussed. Our membership consists of professional designers and artists, hobbyists, and amateurs—all are welcome to join and participate in the quest for cartographic skill and knowledge.

Although we specialize in maps of fictional realms, as commonly used in both novels and games (both tabletop and role-playing), many Guild members are also proficient in historical and contemporary maps. Likewise, we specialize in computer-assisted cartography (such as with GIMP, Adobe apps, Campaign Cartographer, Dundjinni, etc.), although many members here also have interest in maps drafted by hand.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post or view full size images in the forums.

Corilliant's First World

Corilliant's First World

About: This is a basic outline map of a world I'm likely to work around with for a fair bit of time. It comprises of four main continents, hitherto unnamed; multiple smaller landmasses and lots of white paper. I wish to expand this into a larger set of maps, discussing political and climate statuses, and perhaps turn it into a detailed information collection.
That'll depend on if I'll ever find the time to do so!
Created: This map was first outlined on shoddy A4 scrap paper back in late 2013, before I dug it out yesterday, changed slightly and sketched it onto decent A3 paper. I then inked it, and scanned it at school because my good scanner (only scanner, note) is A4 only. Heh.

First of all: You really should ink in (digitally?) what the land is and where the water is. It's a bit unclear and I can only assume.
Beside that: I like the rugged lines for the coast. I'd love to see your process on this. Do you have any experience in mapmaking?

Depends on what you call 'mapmaking'. If you mean hand drawn, I feel fairly confident on developing them in black and white. When it comes to digital colouring, I kinda suck. Hooray for tutorials. Geology; I'm working with my teacher at the moment on how I can create my maps...
I am going to ink them digitally later, but not this week I think. I was going to quick-paint the ocean earlier, but I would need to again, ink it first; tolerance level and quick-paint tools are not my friends today.
They will be tomorrow, I hope.

Ha - I take the land-sea ambiguity as a fascinating effect - I can stare at the map and make it bounce back and forth between land-water and water-land, in my head :-). You have a good eye (and hand) for an appropriate variety of roughness in coastlines.

You made it wrap east-west, which is attention to detail. It's easiest of course when the paper edges can be made to fall in all land or all ocean, but continent configurations like yours can't. Think about projections, though - you have an aspect ratio that isn't 1:2, like a simple equirectangular projection would have. Additional N-S stretching like yours, particularly since you seem to not go all the way to 90 degrees N or S, could be something like a Mercator-ish view. And that brings up the thought of what distortion you might WANT to be showing. Either projection gets more distorted as you go poleward - the first in shape, the second in size. So a practiced eye would expect either vertical squashed-ness, or ballooning (the old Greenland-big-as-Africa effect on schoolroom Mercator world maps).

Where you have a similar degree of coastal detail at all latitudes, wrapping your linework back on a globe would show unexpected distortions and sizes. There's straightforward free apps that will do that re-projecting for you, digitally. Are you just going to show us map progress from scans, and do all your work on paper, or now that you have linework digital will you work on it digitally?

Even at a 15 degree tilt you still have seasons. The difference of temperature between them is lower and the effect of the monsoon is also lower. The poles are colder during the summer but hotter during winter. It means that the tundra would stretch to lower latitudes since they need to have at least one month with the temperature over the freezing point and that condition is harder to archive. The ice caps will also cover more land. The temperature there never go above 0 Celsius. Deserts would be found closer to the equator but could probably cover less land. Rain forest and desert could be replaced by the steppe in some areas. (I'm talking in comparison to Earth)

The south can't be closer to the star all the time. Unless your planet is tidal locked to the star, the movement of the planet is similar to the movement of planet Earth.
But you are right, the north is colder but it's because the % of water is greater. Also, the north lack a continent to block the polar current that circle around with it's cold water. In the south, the cold currents and hot ones clashes more frequently, allowing a better distribution of temperature. But not in the north. The cold water just stays there just like Antarctica. From that, we could say that the northern mid latitudes are hotter than those in the south because it's not coled by the polar waters. Or not as much as in the south.

Since you don't really have land in the north, I wonder what the sea ice look like during the cold season. Ice can't form if the current is too strong. It's not very significant but I just wonder.