Poll: Should Americans be allowed to open carry bazookas and grenades?

A lot of people say that it is not the gun or the weapon that kills someone, it is the person behind the weapon that does it.
Bazookas and grenades would likely be much more affect against someone who is doing a mass shooting, and carrying those around could be beneficial.
Should the United States allow... show more A lot of people say that it is not the gun or the weapon that kills someone, it is the person behind the weapon that does it.

Bazookas and grenades would likely be much more affect against someone who is doing a mass shooting, and carrying those around could be beneficial.

Should the United States allow Americans to open carry bazookas and grenades?

Guns don't kill, people kill. That's true. But weapons of mass destruction, like grenades, bazookas, and, yes, ARs, make it easier for those people to kill masses of people. That's not self-defense, that's mass murder.

We liberals are not trying to repeal the Second Amendment. We are only trying to get ARs added to the list of banned weapons of war that already exists. The one that already bans those bazookas and grenades from private ownership.

Yup
When the Second Amendment was written there was no real difference between civilian and military weapons and in some cases civilian weapons were better than military weapons.
If we extend that idea to it's logical conclusion civilians should be allowed to have the same weapons that the military has

Those are WMD class weapons, although fatal to humans,they are intended to stop tanks and APCs
Fine if your shooter is using an Abrams M-1.
My combat .45 I carry will stop a shooter just as quick, without the mess.