You are here

UK's 'Sunday Times' feature by Gary about plight of today's young porn users

Submitted by Marnia on Sun, 2014-09-21 20:02

"A cure for porn addicts who have lost that loving feeling"

Young men are finding that addiction to hardcore videos is harming their physical ability to have real sex. Gary Wilson explains how science and online discussion groups are helping them to quit

In 2007, something strange happened on the internet. I know, something strange is always happening on the internet. But this wasn’t a viral sensation that came and went in a few weeks. Hundreds and then thousands of people, mostly male, mostly young, started questioning the effects of online pornography. On websites for body-builders, ‘pick-up artists’, medical-advice seekers, car enthusiasts, even guitarists – wherever men gathered online – conversations turned to porn and what it was doing to them.

Some of these men showed up in the forum of my wife’s website about the effects of sex on the brain. They complained of delayed ejaculation, inability to climax and erectile dysfunction (but not with porn), porn fetish tastes that had morphed beyond recognition, and loss of attraction to real partners. Some were convinced they were addicted.

Addiction is a controversial word. But the neuroscience is remarkably unambiguous. Researchers will tell you that both behavioural and drug addictions involve the same brain mechanisms. Whether you take cocaine, gamble or are captivated by internet action, the chronic elevation of your dopamine (the “the go get it” neurochemical) risks bringing on a well established set of core brain changes. Hundreds of neuroscience studies on behavioural addictions – including more than seventy on internet addicts – show all the same addiction-related brain changes seen in substance addicts. (Toxic drugs cause additional effects as well).

From a neuroscience perspective, something epic occurred in 2006. Galleries of short porn clips appeared featuring the hottest few minutes of an unending supply of videos. Sexual stimulation releases the highest natural levels of dopamine, and these “tube sites” (they stream instantly like YouTube videos) could amplify and prolong arousal with surprising, shocking and anxiety-producing content, all of which release dopamine. The porn industry had perfected an addiction hazard that was far more potent than Playboy, VHS, or dial-up because users could keep dopamine elevated just by tapping a screen.

A paradoxical effect of too much dopamine is a drop in sensitivity to it, so as a user slips into addiction everyday pleasures pale. He searches even harder for something “hot”. Meanwhile his brain tightly wires itself to whatever “rewards” him with the biggest dopamine blasts. If that’s porn, eventually he may not be able to climax without constant novelty.

Armed with an account of “how the machine works” that drew on the best available neuroscience, the men on the forum realised that there was a good chance they could reverse porn-induced brain changes simply by quitting. Why wait for an expert consensus about whether internet porn was potentially harmful or not when they could eliminate it and track results? To everyone’s astonishment, grave symptoms generally reversed themselves within months. A trickle of self-reports became a steady stream. Along the way, the men learned, and shared, critical insights about recovery – brand new discoveries that made the return to balance less harrowing for those following. Very soon, younger guys comprised the majority of those seeking solutions for unexplained sexual dysfunctions. They set up anonymous forums to support each other. Now, there are hundreds of thousands of members in such forums worldwide. And yet the entire phenomenon has, until now, remained beneath the radar. We may pride ourselves on our open, “sex-positive” culture. But men tend to keep quiet about erectile dysfunction caused by porn use. It lacks rebel glamour.

This year, addiction neuroscientists at Cambridge and Germany’s Max Planck Institute began to study internet porn users’ brains. Not surprisingly, they found telltale addiction-related changes. Porn addicts’ brains lit up in response to porn-video clips much as cocaine addicts’ brains light up for powder.

More than half of the Cambridge addicts (average age 25) reported difficulty with erections or arousal with real partners though not with porn. And the Max Planck study found that years and hours of porn use correlated with loss of grey matter in the brain’s reward system (which runs on dopamine). Lead researcher Kühn stated that study results ‘could mean that regular consumption of pornography more or less wears out your reward system.’ Interestingly, none of the Max Planck subjects met the diagnostic criteria for addiction and yet their brains evidenced the kinds of changes seen in drug addicts.

The Cambridge researchers also found that the younger the user, the more powerfully his brain responded to porn clips. Adolescents have lower baseline dopamine, which makes day to day life seem boring. If you’re a parent of teens you’ll probably have gathered that already. But their dopamine spikes higher than adults’ in response to thrills. They naturally seek out anything that promises these exhilarating hits. This mechanism drives all young mammals to explore new territories and avoid inbreeding.

Today’s smartphone-wielding adolescent need never leave his bed to experience an endless dopamine drip in the form of novelty, sexual stimulation and risk-taking (edgy porn, cam-2-cam, sexting). He thinks he’s learning about adult sexuality, but he’s actually training for an entirely different sport.

His situation is even more precarious because, by adulthood, his brain will have pruned away billions of nerve connections based on the use-it-or-lose-it principle. Real sex, when it finally occurs, may feel like an alien experience.

The effects are now showing up in some ominous statistics. Fifty-four percent of 16-21 year old Canadian males report sexual problems: low libido (10%), problems with orgasm (24%) and, most commonly, erectile dysfunction (27%). Those percentages are higher than in middle-aged men, and young males now report more sexual problems than females.

Urology professor and President of the Italian Society of Reproductive Pathophysiology Carlo Foresta has been conducting ongoing surveys of teens. In 2013,10.3% of his participants reported low libido. In a mere eight years, that rate had jumped 600% from 1.7%, and teen sexual dysfunctions had doubled. Foresta’s upcoming study of males 19-25 shows higher rates of erectile dysfunction and far lower sexual desire in heavy porn users compared with occasional users.

On the forums I monitor, young men need months longer to recover erectile function than men who did not grow up with streaming porn Mindless identification of porn with sexual liberation is every bit as unhelpful as prudishness. Let’s start from what we now know about the effects of porn on the brains of those who use it and work from there.

Photo caption: Young men have found the physical changes they experience can be reversed if they give up net porn