Anybody gonna talk about NATO implications if Turkey and Syria keep up with the artillery skirmishs.
Oh, and way to go Romney. By "giving weapons" to Sryian opposition, you meant other nations like the status quo.
And I'm sure Russia will cooperate with you after the "#1 geopolitical foe" remark that Putin has already picked up on for mischief.

Romney is totally off subject, so expect only generalities from him tonight.
Obama, on the other hand, will do some diplomatic acrobatics around the truth of our intentions and limits in foreign politics.

James Fallows' correspondent has a theory: Obama goes on the attack on follow up because it tends to throw Romney off. Will see if his response to the question straight at him, up next, is mundane talking points to start.

"Mr Obama's assertion that every time Mr Romney has spoken on foreign policy, he's been wrong, seemed to me absurdly and unfairly sweeping, especially since they say the same thing so much of the time."

"How exactly is America to "get" the Muslim world to reject extremism on its own? Create gender equality? The rule of law? All of that laundry list from the "Arab scholars" Mr Romney cited consists of ends, not means."