In the United
States today, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to openly trash the
U.S. Constitution. Many among the elite are not even trying to hide
how much they hate the U.S. Constitution anymore. As the Patriot
movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that
this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream
media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution. The
level of vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our
Constitution is unprecedented.

It turns
out that the U.S. Constitution does not fit very well with the benevolent
futuristic “Big Brother” totalitarianism that they want to impose on all of
us. All of that talk about “freedom” and “liberty” in the Constitution
does not exactly square with the centralized global planning that the elite
have in mind. The ruling elite believe that the “rights of the
individual” must be greatly restricted for the “good of society” and for the
“good of the environment.” Right now the “constitutional revival” that
is happening in the United States is a direct threat to what the elite are
trying to accomplish, so they are responding by openly attacking the
Constitution.

At more than 90
percent of the law schools in the United States today, the U.S. Constitution
is portrayed as a hopelessly outdated document that is in desperate need of
revision or it is portrayed as a “living, breathing document” that we are
free to alter as society “progresses”. In law schools across the
country, law students are being taught that our founding fathers were
racist, sexist, homophobic bigots that did the best that they could at the
time. Keep in mind that a very large percentage of our politicians and all
of our judges go through these law schools. I personally sat in law
school classes and listened to law professors trash the U.S. Constitution.
This is really happening.

But these days it
is apparently not enough to just poison the minds of law students. Now the
mainstream media is launching a major attack on the U.S. Constitution. The
latest issue of Time Magazine, the number one political magazine in the
United States, has a picture of a half-shredded U.S. Constitution on the
cover with the words “Does It Still Matter?” emblazoned across it. This
front page article was authored by Richard Stengel and unfortunately the
article is not a defense of the U.S. Constitution. Rather, Stengel insists
in his article that the U.S. Constitution “must accommodate each new
generation and circumstance.”

That is exactly
the kind of thing that is constantly being pushed down the throats of law
school students all over the country. Stengel also declares in his
article that we must not allow the Constitution to be “an obstacle” that
will keep us from making the “progress” that we need to make as a society….
“We can pat ourselves on the back about the past 223 years, but we cannot
let the Constitution become an obstacle to the U.S.’s moving into the future
with a sensible health care system, a globalized economy, an evolving sense
of civil and political rights."

This is typical
of what the elite will do. They will applaud the Constitution as being
a good document “for the past” but then they will talk about how we “need to
move forward” because people are so much smarter now than they were back
then. The reality is that many elitists love to denigrate the circumstances
under which the Constitution was drafted and they love to talk about how
much more “sophisticated” we are today.

In an article
entitled “Is It Time To Update The U.S. Constitution?” CNN’s Fareed Zakaria
recently declared that it was time to reexamine our founding document that
was created in a “cramped room” that had “shades drawn over the windows”….
By contrast, any talk of revising or revisiting the U.S. Constitution is, of
course, seen as heresy. The United States Constitution was, as you know,
drafted in a cramped room in Philadelphia in 1787 with shades drawn over the
windows. It was signed by 39 people. But Zakaria was kind compared to a lot
of the other pundits out there.

On an ABC News
political talk show over the weekend, Georgetown professor Michael Eric
Dyson declared that there are “some gaps, some holes, lacunas, gulfs,
abysses” in the Constitution and he went on to make the following
statement…. “When it makes the transition from parchment to pavement, there
again is the rub. The reality is when I talk about the document being living
and vital, I’m talking about the interpretation of it. I’m talking about the
meaning of it.” Do you know why elitists love to talk about the Constitution
being a “living” document? It is because they feel like they have permission
to change and “reinterpret” a document that is “living and breathing.”

Elitists love the
idea that the U.S. Constitution “evolves”, and of course they believe that
it is the role of the ruling elite to direct this “evolution.” James
Altucher, managing partner at Formula Capital, expressed his opinion of the
U.S. Constitution in his recent article entitled “July 4th Is A Scam….”
Most importantly, lets not view the Constitution as gospel. Countries,
people, systems, technology evolves. As they do, its important to see what
from the past is good and what can be discarded. What can be “discarded?”
Absolutely disgusting. But there are others out there that go even farther
in trashing the Constitution.

So far we have
examined quotes from elitists that show at least a few shreds of respect for
the Constitution. They desperately want to change it and reinterpret
it, but at least they acknowledge that is has played a beneficial role in
American history. There are others among the elite that are not afraid to
openly declare hate for the U.S. Constitution. For example, Michael Klarman
of Harvard University Law School delivered a Constitution Day lecture at
Johns Hopkins University last September 16th. His lecture was entitled “A
Skeptical View of Constitution Worship,” and it was a blistering assault on
the U.S. Constitution. Klarman made four major points about “constitutional
idolatry” in his speech….

I have four
points I want to make today against constitutional idolatry, which is my
label for our misguided tendency to blindly worship the Constitution, giving
it credit for all the things we love and honor about our country.

(1) The Framers’ constitution, to a large
degree, represented values we should abhor or at least reject today.

(2) There are parts of the Constitution
with which we are still stuck today even though we would never freely choose
them and they are impossible to defend based on contemporary values.

(3) For the most part, the Constitution is
irrelevant to the current political design of our nation.

(4) The rights protections we do enjoy
today, the importance of which I do not minimize, are mostly a function of
political and social mores, which have dramatically evolved over time and
owe relatively little to courts using the Constitution to protect them.

Remember, this is
not some nutjob that was making this speech. This was a professor of law at
Harvard University. Barack Obama went to the law school at Harvard
University. Hordes of our future politicians and judges and law
professors go through that place. Klarman is not someone to be taken
lightly. Klarman’s remarks were noticed over at The Economist. It is
an open secret that The Economist is a mouthpiece for the global banking
elite and they were quite taken with what Klarman had to say. They
published an article supporting Klarman’s ideas that was entitled “The
Perils Of Constitution-Worship.”

In that article,
those who love and support the U.S. Constitution were described as
“infantile”…. Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the
constitution-worshippers that the complex political arguments of today can
be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century. In
the United States today there is a tug of war over the U.S. Constitution.
Either the “constitutional revival” being spearheaded by the Patriot
movement and the Tea Party movement will eventually win, or the ruling elite
and the mainstream media will eventually win.

Great tests for
this nation are coming. We are standing right on the verge of the
economic collapse of America, and that will be a great time of challenge for
the United States. Our loyalty to the Constitution will be pressed to
the limit as society descends into anarchy. Our politicians are supposed to
take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
But sadly, most of our politicians today seem to think that the Constitution
should be serving them. In fact, this very attitude was clearly expressed in
the Time Magazine article mentioned above…. “The Constitution serves the
nation; the nation does not serve the Constitution.” The inference, of
course, is that once we have made enough “progress” we will be able to toss
aside the U.S. Constitution like some sort of used rag.

The anti-Christ’s plan is to divide the world into ten kingdoms, all using the same monetary system and one religion (see Ten Worldwide Super States: Playing Monopoly* with the devil). The ten-king nations will be forcefully democratic with rotating presidencies; the European Union (EU) is the model. When the time for the anti-Christ arrives, he will be one of these ten kings, according to Revelation 17:10-11. The kings only receive power to grasp control for the anti-Christ at the last hour. The rotating presidencies of these ten super-states will furnish the kings.

How will this happen? The EU has paved the way. The super-states will be divided into ten economic and political powers. They are the 1. EU, 2. North America (Canada, America, Mexico, Central America, and outlaying islands), 3. South America, 4. Russia, 5. Central Asia (The Islamic Republics), 6. East Asia (China, Mongolia, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, etc.), 7. Oceania (Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, New Zealand, and surrounding islands), 8. Southeast Asia (India to Viet Nam), 9. North Africa/Middle-East (Saudi Arabia to Western Sahara, etc.), and 10. Africa (Sub-Sahara, Madagascar). These divisions could be debated. For example, India would go well with Oceania since many Indians speak English and would fare well with Australia. Time will tell.

North America has begun the process. NAFTA and CAFTA are the start. A North American Super-Highway from the mid-southwestern coast of Mexico to Winnipeg, Canada--through the heartland of America, has begun.
The US Constitution stands in the way of the kingdom of the Anti-Christ's
"progress"--it must be trashed according to the globalists.

And the ten horns which thou sawest
are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; buy receive power as
kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their
power and strength unto the beast.
(Rev.17:12-13)

_____________________________________

Are you saved? Are you ready for the tribulation to come? Are you headed to hell without hope and God?