A series of short clips in which the actors introduce the characters they’re playing in James Cameron’s Avatar have been released. And I start wondering about something: in Avatar it seems most humans are played by white people and there are only black people and Native people playing as aliens (as the Na’vi from the planet Pandora)? Check for yourself:

Update: following this post (?), those official videos have been tagged as private by Fox in their youtube account…

Duuuuuude I JUST saw the movie last night. And the moment they showed the scene with the natives I was like, hmmmm, WOW okay.

ALL the natives were either of African descent or Indian. While ALL the humans were white, and OF COURSE the savior of the movie was white as well…. the movie is VERY racist. Because of course the “savages” are of color while the “advanced people” are white, but moreover the main thing that got me was that the “savior” of the avatar people was…. yea you guessed it “WHITE”!

I thought it was racist, not only were all the humans white and the na’vi were played by the characters you’ve shown. But the white characters are all evil except the white hero and his allies who are only good because they fight against the other white people.

What does this say?? White people are bad. Non-white people are good. White people can only be good if they help other non-white people kill whites. What would everyone think if the roles were reversed?

I personally think that racism is a bit of an over-exaggeration. In fact, in this movie, humans are to be seen as the colonials, the bad people in other words. What Cameron had in mind was to portray history through his film. te, the establishment of colonies by the white people( English colonies in india, america,…. French colonies in Vietnam,….). If we go along this idea, then it is most obvious that humans in avatar are to be white people, hence white actors.

i dont think they were trying to be racist. i reckon they just wanted the actors’ accents for the natives, so they don’t speak like the humans in this movie. Anyway Krisp is right, the white people are being protrayed as bad. whats to argue about? They acknowledge that the Na’vi are much better people then the humans!

What ever happened to watching a movie and enjoying it for what it is? It is Cameron’s movie after all. Also how the hell does someone tell that the white people on Pandora was christian? I don’t remember seeing a church.

Should the new movie “book of eli” also be considered racist as the only good main character is black and it seems all the white people are bad?

Look guys i don’t think that movie is racist! Americans see racism in everything i watched the movie and its ok! the reason why are the natives blue is because whole Pandora f***ed up Europeans have learned to forget nasty stuff in history! slavery is 400 years old! if you search racism in everything you will find “it”. i understand that black people can’t forget what happened to them in the past! we Bosnian people had a lot of crap and i’m talking just the past century! but we are trying to put that in the past! You have to admit that there a lot of jokes in movies pointed to offend white people and nobody tells that that’s racist so chill out and enjoy the movie.

Slavery has been around a lot longer than 400 years. To as far back as the Egyptians. Blacks slaved blacks and whites slaved whites. Its not like the history books are not filled of pages of this stuff. The Europeans were just as brutal to their fellow people as they were to anyone else.

im not really sure, you could look at this 2 diff ways; the savages are all black, the more powerful and developed race is white. however the natives won and kicked the whites asses and there were several points in this movie that the whites were bashed. then again the movie is saying whites are evil and your only good if you help blacks kill whites. all in all i personally thought it was a good movie, politically and socially edgy with mixed messages but still a good movie. maybe we are all just blowing this out of proportion. who knows?

Okay, if we’re playing the race card, you can slap that sticker on just about every bit of media out there. Hmmm. Dances with Wolves. I don’t remember anybody pointing fingers there. And, in case you’re too damned stupid to notice, Avatar is pretty much Dances With Wolves in space, but a LOT more stunning and FUN! (Sorry, Mr. Costner, you were putting me to sleep in places….) The casting was done to achieve a particular flow to the voices. So, yes, some of them were probably picked for ethnicity because they had the SOUND that was wanted, that particular tonal lilt that white people generally just don’t have and sound fake if they try to “put it on”. It’s called production value and it was spot on!

People need to get over the need to play the race card on every little thing and just grow up. I’m Hispanic. I don’t feel like this movie was any more racist than anything else in the movies or on television.

AVATAR is definitely “racist”, but not in the sentimental “black & white” simplicity of post-Obama politics. It is flat out an anti-human-race movie, with special emphasis on white male fundamentalist macho war mongers.

The filmmaker’s sympathy is unmistakably with the Na’vi, and for that reason Jim Cameron cast the most sympathetic “people-of-color” he could find as the primary actors for the spiritual inhabitants of Pandora. Even Michelle Rodriguez is a sympathizer and sides with the “natives.”

If you look at the group shots of the troops that mercenary Col. Quaritch assembled, there is a representative mix of human races present.

First and foremost, only the director knows what his intentions were for voice overs and such. I do agree that it was most likely for the dialect. It was a good movie. As for people worried about the race thing…….. Deal with it! Those who find things racist usually are the poor souls with nothing better to do with their sad little lives than to do just that, find something they can cry about. The Natives in this land were slaves a good while before African slaves were introduced to the “white man” . By the way, It was rivaling tribes that tore families apart and enslaved their own to sell to the french who in turn sold them to the english. (study facts, not what you think you know.) I am of Native decent and yes I saw a strong link to what happened to my own people. However, there’s a great deal of people from many cultures that can say the same thing. Please, grow up, and stop casting stones into the past. And look at your own culture(s) before you start blaming others.

Almost every great work of art is created to work on multiple levels, including an “actual” story or theme and also a subtext. This movie falls into that category. Here’s my reaction:

Writer/Director James Cameron shows old school racist colors as well as extreme hypocrisy way in this admittedly visually spectacular film.

1. White man saves primitive species–PLEASE, James, not this pat Hollywood formula AGAIN. I know it makes money but give me a break–I threw up a little in my mouth when I saw this coming one more time. (please note – I’m white).

2. White man flips seamlessly between his white world and the more compelling primitive world (Cameron living vicariously through the Na’vi (NBA?), as he no doubt wishes that he, like many white libs, were black). OK man, got it, but the expiration date on that one was about 1989 and now it’s really starting to stink up the place.

3. I loved the makeup of the military defectors–a Latino dude, a handicapped white dude, two white academics, and a probable Lesbian. Man, I dig that Democratic party! James, do you have any other paint by numbers coloring books you can share?

4. Closing scenes show almost every single bad human to be white men. Certainly no women, and few if any Latinos, Asians or Blacks. Hmmm.

5. Worst of all, the real story of the film is not the taking of the precious metal from the Na’vi, or about the taking of oil from Iraq, or about the stripping of the the rain forest. It’s about the James Cameron mining our uncertainties about race in order to make an insane amount of money. This kind of maneuver will blow up your emotional Hometree whether you realize it or not, and most people will never how completely they have been manipulated by this film.

James Cameron creates racial tension by splitting the cast and audience into moral liberals vs. mean white conservatives, take your pick. He then exploits that tension to obtain one of the biggest financial paydays in human history. This is a film which attempts to expose greed and exploitation, while at the same time is itself almost unthinkably greedy and exploitative. Whew. This world never ceases to amaze.

I prefer to live in a post-racial world where I don’t really give a damn about anyone’s race. I don’t care if you are white, brown, green, black, purple or see-through, if you’re a good person I’m going to like you, and if not then I’ll be seeing you later.

You people are so ridiculous. Can’t you just watch a movie and stop thinking it’s aimed at a race. Get a life. And so what if a movie did single out a race who cares. Why don’t we just say football is racist. The qb position only has white players and the rb position has only black players. I’m real tired of hearing about this issue being brought up over and over in our society. Get over it!

I love when white people get upset about the blacks being discriminated against? It’s like you’re trying to make up for something you didn’t even experience. I bet you would all hire a Mexican to fix your roof any day. Oh, and I bet all of you still buy crap from China everyday. So shut the hell up and stay at home. The movie was religiously and environmentally centered.

Avatar is the best movie I have every seen. My entire family enjoyed it, including my mom, aunt, uncle, AND grandma (all of whom are major plot-people). James Cameron is a freaking GENIUS! And to all of the nit-pickers out there, I will now destroy your arguments.

Point A: Rascism 1. The reasons that the aliens were all played by black actors were: the difference in accent and the different racial characteristics. The animated characters were created using the actor’s faces and since the Na’vi were humaNIOD, not human, there needed to be a contrast between the features of the people and the features of the aliens. 2. The reason that the soldiers were predominatly white was that these men were mercenaries, hired from the American Marine Corps several hundred years from now. The Marine Corps is a statistically white-majority organization. Also, as stated above, there needed to be a noticable contrast between the human characters and the alien characters.

I have to go to sleep now. I will be back tommorow to dismantle the rest of your complaints. Feel free to think of more.

Here’s why (no spoiler). Man who is savaging the planet land is a business man and said *”Blue Monkeys” (referring to the Aliens as black people monkeys, though since their skins are blue, then blue monkeys) *”We try to teach them, feed them, cloth them but they don’t get it” (referring to Oxfam and other people helping the poverty and third world side of Africa.)

They said something about demolish by using Gas. That was a reference to the Holocaust, when they used the gas chambers to kill people.

And also at the end of the movie, when those “Sky people were leaving the planet” That was a brief reference to show that those Aliens turn the white people to slaves.

Also no black people in the marine, just 1 black guy who appeared all the time. (well certain times)

The general was too awesome, he should be Duke Nukem.

In all, the movie was definitely not my type, too sci-fi. It was rated 12 and so much swearing and violence:/

Story was cliche, same thing we know about: outcast joins a group, falls in love with the girl, boy relating to the girl who wants to marry her hates the outcast. Outcast must try and be better. In the end falls in love with girl:/