Old Age and Survivor's Insurance

SSR 60-17. OLDEST RECORD DISAGREES WITH CONVINCING, MORE RECENT
EVIDENCE OF AGE

In establishing an individual's date of birth, while the oldest record of
age available ordinarily has the highest probative value, where it can be
shown that the oldest record is not correct, the date of birth may be
found on the basis of more recent evidence where it is convincingly
established by all the evidence considered as a whole.

In 1955, after the death of A, W applied for mother's insurance benefits
on his earnings record. At that time she gave her date of birth as
December 24, 1899, but her age was not material to her eligibility for
benefits as long as she had in her care a child under 18 entitled to
benefits. (Section 202(g) of the Social Security Act.) In December 1957,
after her son had reached age 18 and they no longer were entitled to
benefits, W applied for widow's insurance benefits under section 202(e)
alleging that she had already reached the retirement age of 62 and that
her correct date of birth was December 24, 1895.

As evidence of her date of birth the following documents were
submitted:

(1) A record of the arrival in the United States of W's family on May 27,
1911, showing her mother's age as 35 and the names and ages of the
children as: E, 15; W, 11; H, 9; S, 7; F, 4; and R, 3. This record would
establish 1899 as W's year of birth.

(2) As explanatory statement from W stating, among other things, that the
true ages of the children were respectively 18, 15, 13, 12, 9, and 6; but
that, by alleging that the children were younger, the family was able to
pay only two full and three half steamship fares to the United States (two
sailed without fares), instead of being required to pay five full fares
and two half fares. The father had arrived in America in the summer of
1906; his funds were very limited; and the saving in fare was a
substantial amount to a man in his circumstances at that time.

(3) Affidavits from five of W's sisters stating their own ages and that
W's date of birth was December 24, 1895.

(4) School records for S, F, and R, the three younger sisters,
established in 1914 showing their dates of birth as September 25, 1899,
April 5, 1902, and October 15, 1906 respectively.

(5) A statement from W's optometrist, Dr. D, certifying that his records
showed that on July 23, 1935, W gave her date of birth as December 24,
1895. W stated that she gave her true date of birth to Dr. D only upon his
insistent request that she tell him her exact age because of the medical
consequences.

Regulations No. 4, § 404.703 provides that in determining the weight to
be given to evidence offered to prove age, consideration will be given to
its general probative value. The probative value of evidence of age is
determined by considering such factors as the purpose for which a record
was established, the basis for the record, the formality of the record,
and its location and age. Other factors being equal, the oldest record
normally has the highest probative value.

In this case, however, in the face of the school records made three years
later and other explanatory statements, doubt is cast upon the correctness
of the 1911 record of the family's arrival in the United States which
normally would have great weight and validity in establishing age. The
reason for giving incorrect ages for the children at that time was
convincingly explained. The school records made in 1914 establish the
dates of birth of the three younger children as alleged in their
affidavits. R could not have been as young as three years of age and she
had to be nearly six at the time she entered the United States since her
father had come to the United States about five years earlier.
Correspondingly, F could not have been four years of age but had to be
nearly nine as is indicated on her school record. W was the second of the
six children and must have been born several years before S, the fourth
child, whose date of birth was definitely established as September 25,
1899. Although the school records do not establish W's actual date of
birth, the doctor's record established in 1935 shows her date of birth as
December 24, 1895. This record, which supports W's allegation, was based
on information given upon the doctor's insistence and constitutes credible
evidence.

It is held, therefore, that the evidence and statements presented
are sufficient to establish that W was born on December 24, 1895, as
claimed.

Important Information:

Other Government Websites:

Follow:

External Link Disclaimer

You are exiting the Social Security Administration's website.

Select OK to proceed.

Disclaimer

The Social Security Administration (SSA) website contains links to websites not affiliated with the United States government. These may include State and Local governmental agencies, international agencies, and private entities.

SSA cannot attest to the accuracy of information provided by such websites. If we provide a link to such a website, this does not constitute an endorsement by SSA or any of its employees of the information or products presented on the non-SSA website.

Also, such websites are not within our control and may not follow the same privacy, security or accessibility policies. Once you visit such a website, you are subject to the policies of that site.