I really enjoyed the first three American Pie movies and I was pretty excited to see that a reunion movie with the original cast was made. I’ve been reading mixed reviews about the movie but they are a part of my teenage years and I couldn’t help wanting to see this one as well. At the kiosk by my house the movie wasn’t available but a Dish co-worker suggested trying out Blockbuster @ Home. It brings the movies right to my door or I can stream directly to my Hopper. I got the movie about a week a go and I really enjoyed it. There are thousands of other movies I can get delivered by mail so no more hunting them down. This movie reminds people in my age group of one thing – we aren’t as young as we used to be and that’s ok. That’s what a reunion is for anyway: to remind us of times past.

Thought maybe I was simply in disagreement on Grimm's views of many movies and decided to trust him and pay to watch his latest positively reviewed movie, 21 Jump Street. Just wasted 3.99 on the Amazon Instant Video site thanks to this, once again, terribly inaccurate review. Won't you please, please, PLEASE bring back James Digiovanna???? Grimm, you truly embody your last name with each and every inaccurate review. Get it together TW.

As usual you hit the nail on the head, this time with Dune. It is an abysmal movie and a great descecration of one of the great classics of science fiction.

For readers who want to see (parts of) the Dune Series in video, the DVDs to get are the SciFi (yeah, I know they changed the name by they rarely show real sci-fi anymore either) Channel's two mini-series Dune and the sequel, Children of Dune.

The theatrical versions of "Lord of the Ding Dongs" are superior, as they are SHORTER, and Howard Shore's music was tightly written to fit them instead of the filler tracks that are slopped over the extended versions.

As an example of how the theatrical versions are superior, watch the final battle between the Uru-kai (is that how it's spelled?) and Aragorn in "The Fellowship of the Ring." The extended version has a goofy moment in which the villain licks his own blood off a knife that had been stuck into his leg. The theatrical version excises that nonsense, but edits the action much more coherently, and with heart-pulsingly climactic music.

Another example is during "The Return of the King." The extended version contains a scene of the Witch King of Angmar (or whatever -- it's a Nazgul wraith-thing on a flying lizard) attacking Gandalf and destroying his staff (in no way is that symbolically phallic...). Then a horn sounds in the distance, and the Nazgul just flies away in the middle of the battle. It's a stupid moment; he could have finished off Gandalf and THEN flown away. This anticlimactic nonsense was cut from the theatrical version for good reason.

So, it's your call: Do you want to watch 8.5 hours of "Lord of the Rings" that has all the best stuff in it, with better editing and music -- or do you want to watch 11 hours with lots of sluggish character development and back-story about the homey lives of Hobbits?

"Extract" is dry and doesn't quite know what to do with the Kunis character (she's the screenplay spoiler, never offered much dimension), but the film retains a healthy sense of humor. This is Judge's chi, showcasing destructive tendencies as the characters wind their way to inner peace, delivered in a sly manner that deepens the experience, making suffering relatable and hilarious.