PORTLAND, Oregon (Reuters) - Federal agents have seized records from a national company that solicits thousands of Americans to donate their bodies to science each year, then profits by dissecting the parts and distributing them for use by researchers and educators. = Or maybe you can be sold for the satanic elite customers or be transform in meat and be sold in your supermarket or in Mc Donald, who knows what they are doing? Universities and hospital, funeral homes are all control by the Jesuits, so what can we expect for the respect of the human body of your loved one? There's a big market for the body parts of humans.

The headquarters of MedCure, one of the nation's largest body brokers, raided by FBI agents last week conducting a search warrant, is shown outside Portland, Oregon, November 6, 2017. REUTERS/John Shiffman

The search warrant executed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation at MedCure Inc headquarters here on November 1 is sealed, and the bureau and the company declined to comment on the nature of the FBI investigation. But people familiar with the matter said the inquiry concerns the manner in which MedCure distributes body parts acquired from its donors.

MedCure is among the largest brokers of cadavers and body parts in the United States. From 2011 through 2015, documents obtained under public-record laws show, the company received more than 11,000 donated bodies and distributed more than 51,000 body parts to medical industry customers nationally. In a current brochure, the company says that 80,000 additional people have pledged to donate their bodies to MedCure when they die.

FBI spokeswoman Beth Anne Steele confirmed the day-long search of the 25,000-square-foot facility, but declined to comment further because the matter is under seal. A person familiar with the matter said that FBI agents took records from MedCure but did not remove human remains.

The search warrant, though sealed, signals that an FBI investigation of MedCure has reached an advanced stage. To obtain a search warrant to seize records, rather than demand them via subpoena, FBI agents must provide a detailed affidavit to a U.S. magistrate with evidence to support probable cause that crimes have been committed and that related records may be on the premises.

“MedCure is fully cooperating with the FBI, and looks forward to resolving whatever questions the government may have about their business,” said Jeffrey Edelson, a Portland attorney who represents the company. “Out of respect for the integrity of the process, we do not believe that further comment is appropriate at this time.”

It is illegal to profit from the sale of organs destined for transplant, such as hearts and kidneys. But as a Reuters series detailed last month, it is legal in most U.S. states to sell donated whole bodies or their dissected parts, such as arms and heads, for medical research, training and education.

Commonly known as body brokers, these businesses often profit by targeting people too poor to afford a burial or cremation. Reuters documented how people who donate their bodies to science may be unwittingly contributing to commerce. Few states regulate the body donation industry, and those that do so have different rules, enforced with varying degrees of thoroughness. Body parts can be bought with ease in the United States. A Reuters reporter bought two heads and a spine from a Tennessee broker with just a few emails.

MedCure, founded in 2005, is based outside Portland, Oregon, and has offices in Nevada, Florida, Rhode Island and Missouri, as well as Amsterdam, the Netherlands. At some locations, including the one near Portland, MedCure provides training labs for doctors and health professionals to practice surgical techniques. MedCure also sends body parts and technicians to assist with medical conferences across the country.

MedCure is accredited by the American Association of Tissue Banks, a national organization that primarily works with transplant tissue banks. The broker is also licensed by the state health departments in Oregon and New York, among the few states that conduct inspections. According to Oregon state health records, officials renewed MedCure’s license in January, following a routine on-site review.

A controversial billboard campaign calling abortion "sacred," "a blessing," "family value," "life-saving," and "a second chance," among other things, was launched this week by the largest abortion clinic in Ohio.

The 16 billboards put up across the Greater Cleveland area all start with the phrase "Abortion is _____" and are completed with a variety of words in support of the practice.

"We want to push people to think about abortion in new, diverse ways with these billboards," explained Nancy Starner, Preterm's director of development and communications.

"We want the people in our community who have had abortions to know that they're not alone."

The clinic further argues as part of its latest campaign that abortion is "normal and necessary," "good medicine," "safer than childbirth" and "right for me."

"To a physician, abortion may be a medical procedure that takes less than 10 minutes to perform. To a parent struggling to make ends meet, abortion may be the best way to love and care for your family. To a young person, abortion may be the chance to graduate," it states.

Blasting the billboards, evangelist Franklin Graham said all of the statements made in Preterm's ad campaign are "lies."

"God says, 'Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.' That's exactly what an abortion business in Ohio is doing," Graham argued. "Here's a billboard for them—'Abortion is evil, because it's murder.' Pray that America will wake up to the tragedy of children being killed through abortion every day in this nation."

Lila Rose, founder and president of Live Action, also denounced the billboards, calling them "sick and wrong."

"An abortion business is trying to normalize the killing of preborn children with billboards that call abortion 'sacred,' life-saving,' and 'a blessing.' Here's an accurate slogan: 'Abortion is the killing of a human life,'" she tweeted.

The billboard campaign comes just months after Planned Parenthood Black Community sparked outrage over its suggestion that for black women in America, "it's statistically safer to have an abortion than to carry a pregnancy to term or give birth."

"Disgusting," wrote Antonia Okafor, political commentator and CEO and co-founder of the #emPOWERed movement. "To encourage ppl like me to end our future children's lives instead of empowering us to grow healthy human beings. Vile."

Americans remain divided on abortion. Some of the latest national survey data provided by Pew found that in 2017, some 57 percent of American adults believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 40 percent said that it should be illegal in all or in most cases.

Last year saw some significant pro-life victories, with activist group Operation Rescue reporting in December that 49 abortion clinics were closed in 2017, which is more than twice the number of clinics that were opened.

Operation Rescue argued that a major factor for these clinic closures is "a decreased demand for abortions."

"There appears to be a correlation between clinics closing and a decrease in abortion numbers. According to the CDC, abortion numbers have been dropping steadily since 2005," the group said.

"Some facilities have not been able to compete in an ever-shrinking abortion market and have been forced to downside or shut down. At the same time, when abortion facilities close, abortion numbers decrease even more."

The left is so adamantly in favor of abortion they actually openly lament the fact that pro-life clinics are successfully convincing women not to murder their own children.

Let that sink in.

Several pro-abortion activist groups are currently pressuring Google to stop being “complicit” in the way pro-life pregnancy centers turn up in Google search results.

Many pro-life centers, who obviously target women seeking abortion with their marketing strategy, have successfully tagged their web presence so their clinics show up when women search for local pregnancy resource centers or abortion clinics.

The idea is, and this has been greatly successful for many pro-life clinics seeking to prevent infanticide, to reach out to women who are pregnant and scared and help them through the pregnancy offering resources, support, and love, rather than the cold-blooded murder of their infant children before they even have a chance to be born.

And this has people in the business of killing babies pretty ticked off.

“Women are seeking medical information, and Google is sending them to clinics that not only don’t actually provide what they claim to — but are actively trying to trick and mislead women,” says Karin Roland, chief campaigns officer for UltraViolet, one of the far-left pro-abortion group protesting Google.

That’s right–the very same people who call abortion “women’s health” and title abortion mills deceptively across the country are upset that pro-life clinics are “tricking” women into not getting abortions.

According to Business Insider, “pro-choicers from the groups UltraViolet and Credo, both connected to Planned Parenthood, were riding bicycles behind Google’s shuttle buses on Tuesday with signs that read, “‘Searching for abortion care? Google will send you to fake, anti-abortion clinics.'”

Again, said by the people who call abortion mills “pregnancy centers”.

The craziest thing is, that according to the Daily Wire, it is well documented that pro-life pregnancy centers have high client satisfaction rates.

“As noted by Jay Hobbs at the Washington Examiner, abortion activists have been unsuccessful in finding ‘any real-life woman claiming she’s been mistreated, tricked, or misled in any way by a pregnancy help center.’ In fact, the Christian Post says that those clinics Rolands wishes to keep from the public eye actually have a near 99% client satisfaction rate,” the Daily Wire’s Paul Bois notes.

Imagine that–these pro-abortion groups are actually upset that women are being talked out of abortion, even though women are almost always more satisfied when they’re talked out of abortion!

Bois does have a suspicion as to why these groups want Google to censor the pro-life clinics, and it, not surprisingly, has nothing to do with “women’s health.”

“Perhaps the reason that Rolands wishes to close them is not so women could be better off, but because those clinics suck the abortion mills of their revenue,” he notes.

This is a very valid theory, and most likely correct. Abortion clinics don’t care about women’s health and they certainly don’t care about the females who are being killed in the womb.

They only care about their blood money. And they can’t stand that one of the most important tools for repressing free speech in the country right now–biased Google–won’t get with the program!

Police in Minneapolis, Minnesota, have been ordered to “never suggest or demand” that paramedics use powerful horse tranquilizers on suspects, following a report that the practice had spiked in recent years.

“Palestine is etched on the heart of the fetusA proud Martyr in his mother’s womb”-song on PA TV, Fatah TV, and PA radio idealizes Martyrdom

"The First Direction of Prayer" by Syrian singer Assala Nasri:“Our Martyrs are convoys and our bones are mountainsWe don’t surrender to the lowlyWe aren't deterred by imprisonmentPalestine is etched on the heart of the fetusA proud Martyr in his mother’s wombAnd the Arab state will remain ours - Arab, Arab Palestine...We [hold] the rifles to our chests and our eyes are raised to youOur homes are trenches and our souls are the sacrifice for youO Jerusalem, you will not remain stolen.”[Official PA TV, June 19 and 26, 2018]

So, these unethical docs pump moms full of vaccines that mess up the babies they carry (flu vacc, I'm looking at you) and then kill the "defective" babies? Look into adrenochrome, organ harvesting and cannibalism coming to a grocery store near you.﻿

Women lined up for examinations this month before sterilization surgery at a government hospital in Mahendragarh, India.CreditKuni Takahashi for The New York TimesBy Ellen Barry and Celia W. Dugger

Feb. 20, 2016

MAHENDRAGARH, India — This is what family planning in India often looks like: Women in their 20s, mostly farmers’ wives, gather at dawn on the stairs of a district hospital. Hours later, a surgeon arrives. His time is short. He asks the women to sit in a row on the floor of the operating room and then, in operations lasting a few minutes apiece, uses a laparoscope to sever their fallopian tubes, ensuring they will never again bear a child.

For decades, India has relied on female sterilization as its primary mode of contraception, funding about four million tubal ligations every year, more than any other country. This year, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi will take a major step toward modernizing that system, introducing injectable contraceptives free of charge in government facilities. The World Health Organization recommends their use without restriction for women of childbearing age.

New birth control options have long been advocated by international organizations, among them the United States Agency for International Development and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They say Indian women — often worn out, anemic and at higher risk of death because they bear children young and often — urgently need methods to delay or space pregnancies.

The number of lives touched by such policies is enormous and growing. India will soon surpass China as the world’s most populous nation, and by 2050 it is expected to gain 400 million new citizens, more than the population of the United States.

Paradoxically, here in India, the keenest opposition to these newer methods of birth control — ones seen in the West as empowering women to control their fertility — has come from some women’s activist groups that distrust the safety of these methods and believe that profit-hungry Western pharmaceutical companies are pushing them. Despite growing evidence of the safety of the injectables and their increasingly widespread use across South Asia, these groups have continued to oppose them. And it is Mr. Modi’s socially conservative Bharatiya Janata Party that has broken with decades of resistance to injectables.

The shift in policy has come in part because the government is less concerned about opposition from civil society groups, most of them more closely aligned with the previous ruling party, the Indian National Congress. Officials were also spurred by a medical disaster in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh, where 13 women died in 2014 after undergoing tubal ligation at a high-volume government “sterilization camp.”

A woman was wheeled from an operating room after having sterilization surgery this month at a government hospital in Mahendragarh, India.CreditKuni Takahashi for The New York Times

“I thought it was incumbent on the government to provide it as a choice,” said C. K. Mishra, additional secretary in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, of the contraceptive Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, or DMPA, which has been used in the private sector since 1993. Still, the method will be introduced gingerly, limited at first to select district hospitals and medical colleges and then expanded next year to hospitals throughout the country. Implanted contraceptives may follow.

“We want to be very careful,” Mr. Mishra said. “We don’t want to put a single step wrong.”

In the context of India’s recent history, it is no wonder officials have been risk-averse and advocates mistrustful. In 1975, the government of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi led an aggressive campaign, in some cases forcing young or childless men to undergo vasectomies to meet quotas. More than six million sterilizations were performed, igniting a widespread protest movement.

More than a decade later, when India began exploring the public use of injectable contraceptives, activist groups filed cases with the country’s Supreme Court seeking to ban the drugs, contending that they had not been proved safe and could be used coercively.

The court forwarded the matter to India’s Drug Technical Advisory Board, which in 1995 allowed private use to continue but recommended against offering them in government clinics. The decision was not revisited for 20 years, even as use of the method became widespread in neighboring Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal.

Opponents contend that India’s health infrastructure is too weak to regulate use of the drugs, monitor side effects or ensure that patients have given informed consent. India’s government spends just over 1 percent of its gross domestic product on public health, compared with around 3 percent in Russia and China and 8 percent in the United States.

“Invariably these new methods are tried on women who have no infrastructure to fall back on, who have no other resources to go for private health care,” said Navsharan Singh, a senior program specialist at the International Development Research Center, which is financed by the government of Canada. She said the current plan, to deliver the drugs through major hospitals, improved the prospects for follow-up.

A woman filling out a consent form for sterilization surgery. India funds about four million tubal ligations every year.CreditKuni Takahashi for The New York Times

Some opposition is tinged with ideology, with critics tracing American support for population control back to a Cold War era when they say birth control was seen as a way to combat poverty and to stop the spread of Communism by curbing chronic poverty. Mohan Rao, a professor of social sciences at Jawaharlal Nehru University and longtime opponent of injectables, said the government would have introduced them years ago were it not for India’s “mass-based women’s organizations.” He added, “They had a clear analysis of what is imperialism and what imperialism does to populations in third-world countries.”

In 2010, K. Sujatha Rao, then the union secretary in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in the Congress-led government, recommended lifting the ban on injectable contraceptives. But she left her post shortly thereafter, she said, and “because of civil society pressure, when I left, the government didn’t push it at all.”

The atmosphere around injectable contraceptives began to shift after Mr. Modi’s party took over in May 2014, and it gained momentum after the Chhattisgarh catastrophe, about six months later. Last year, “All the stars aligned,” said Dr. Jyoti Vajpayee, a gynecologist who oversees family planning programs here for the Gates Foundation.“This government has come back in a majority, so they can afford to take risks,” she said.

She and others had long sought to convince officials that existing options — male and female sterilization, the pill, IUDs and condoms — were insufficient for millions of Indian women who marry in their late teens and spend years carrying back-to-back pregnancies.

Research has shown that, globally, 30 percent of maternal deaths and 10 percent of child deaths could be prevented if women spaced their pregnancies two years apart.

At a meeting in August, the Drug Technical Advisory Board recommended that DMPA be included in the family planning program, saying 20 years of private use and studies of similar drugs by the Indian Council for Medical Research had established that they were safe to introduce without a pilot program.

Dr. C. N. Purandare, past president of the Federation of Obstetric and Gynecological Societies of India and a proponent of the drugs, praised the government for what he called “a bold step.”

Not that the traditional method is being phased out. At a recent sterilization camp about 90 miles west of Delhi, a time-honored system was chugging along.

The women here, many of whom had traveled from their villages, said that they were eager to go for “the operation,” and that the cash incentive of 1,400 rupees, about $20, had not affected their decision. They had been urged on by outreach workers who had accompanied them to the camp, older women from their own villages.

These women are paid 1,000 rupees for each patient with two or fewer children who comes in for sterilization and 240 rupees for each patient with three or more. They admitted that there were drawbacks to sterilization, especially for young women who might someday want to have another child.

“We have to tell them a lot of things to convince them,” said Sudesh Wati, 50.

Young women often listen to the outreach workers.

“After she spoke to me, I made up my mind that in today’s times, nobody wants more than two children,” said Krishna Yadav, 35, gesturing at an amiable gray-haired woman standing nearby. “She has been telling me this for the last two months.”

Asked about injectable contraceptives, the women mostly looked blank. They had never heard of them.

In any case, said Lalit Sharma, a nurse who trains outreach workers, when a new method comes online, women will almost certainly accept it.

“Whatever method it might be,” he said, “if the government implements it, they blindly trust it.”

The raids began 2 months ago, first was Cantrell Funeral home,,following was a tip that outed Perry Funeral home. It's beyond disgusting. The authorities are following the paper trails. Many of the fetuses found did have paperwork signed off from Detroit area hospitals, siting the named funeral homes were to provide end of life services: cremation etc. The funeral homes did receive the fetuses, infants, then disposed of them like trash, contained them, hid them, didn't respond to the family members. Some of the infants who were still born, some mothers signed papers, they donating their baby to science, ( donor program) these infants too were found within the remains of the discarded. When they weren't to be sent, taken, rec'd. They are attempting to connect the hospital paper trails with these Funeral homes, within the investigation, this goes deep. Detroit News, 3 days ago, A Memorial Service was provided for the victims, families of the remains found at Cantrell, https://www.wxyz.com/news/memorial-service-to-be-held-for-those-whose-remains-were-found-at-cantrell-funeral-home The list is LONG ..it's horrific.

To add insult to injury, a private person has purchased Cantrell in Detroit, it is being converted, updated to be a Community Center for Children and Families. This building needs to be torn down. It's a place where evil persons committed acts of atrocity against human beings. The full story will it ever be told? what else were they doing? organ trade, were any of the victims alive when they were brought there? Pure Evil. The word on the street within comments, Detroiters, is this is from the top down, that it's a network within funeral homes, and who else?, that these two, Cantrll & Perry were exposed, so far. that there is probability more homes involved. Thank You Paul﻿

Boxah my first thought was to say « pizza gate is real » but for God sake , i cannot wrap my mind around de fact that if these babies were sacrificed , why they ketp the bodies when burning or buried them would have been so easy for them ... this is truly horrific, and worst , do imagine working there , nowing that there are babie’s body hidden everywhere.... haaaaa﻿