Trump’s new commitment to continue the war in Afghanistan comes as a shock, after all the Americans had voted to stop Washington’s wars around the world. As a punishment, they are being treated to an artificially created civil conflict, while the deep state continues to use the US infrastructure, financial and human capital and military to pursue its doctrine of perpetual war.

It makes sense to look at the plans they have revealed so far to see what to expect. After all, we all have witnessed working of the plan revealed by the general Wesley Clark in 2007 to take out seven countries in five years.

For those who don’t know this yet, “Operational Environments” are countries that the US bombs and invades.

THE TRADOC mentioned here is the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. TRISA is Tradoc Intelligence Support Activity.

Keep in mind, this 20-year plan written in 2012 prior to the mass migration from Africa and the Middle East to Europe, but it speaks of the European economic and societal collapse by the year of 2028. This plan also speaks of Ukraine becoming a NATO member, even so it was written prior to the Maidan color revolution and the war in Ukraine. Also, this plan was written prior to the North Korea obtaining the Soviet ICBM technologies from Ukraine, but it names North Korea as “Operational Environment,” or, in plain English, a war zone.

Reading this remarkable document should enlighten you on predetermined nature of the US wars, engagements, lead from behind actions, and all the activities in support for “human rights.” For the Europeans to blame Muslims in an ongoing migrant crisis is like blaming cattle for running over their fields, and ignoring cowboys driving and steering their herd from behind.

According to this plan, the most crucial event of 2016 wasn’t Hilary Clinton losing the elections and Donald Trump winning. The most important event was the Indian government signing the logistics support and communication interoperability agreements that the U.S. has lobbied intensively for since 2005, but the Indian government had been refusing to sign because it will nullify India’s independent security stance, interfere with India’s easy access to Iranian energy supplies, jeopardize Indian partner status in the Silk Road projects among other things.

Newly elected Indian government threw caution to the wind, and signed the LEMOA agreement in April 2016. LEMOA stands for Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA), an India-specific version of the Logistics Support Agreement (LSA). The three agreements — Logistics Support Agreement (LSA), Communications Interoperability and Security Memorandum of Agreement (CISMOA) and Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement for Geo-spatial Cooperation (BECA) are referred to as the foundational agreements which the U.S. signs with countries with which it has close military ties.

The agreement permits American aircraft and warships to access Indian military bases for refuelling, repair and other logistical purposes.

This agreement gives the US military a legal foothold in Eurasia. Something they have never had before.

Sure enough, soon after the events started coming like bananas. To name a few:

Uncontrolled growth of the US personnel and equipment in Afghanistan

Naming Pakistan a threat to the US.

Skirmishes between India and Pakistan, in which the US takes India’s side. This hostilities were most likely initiated by the US SOF dressed as corresponding militaries.

Skirmishes between India and China, in which the US takes India’s side. Most likely initiated by the US SOF.

Transfer to Korea ICBM technologies from Ukraine by the SBU under a full control of the C.I.A.

The attempts to initiate a war on North Korea.

So far, the US attempts failed because Russian fleet positioned itself between the N. Korean coast and the US 7th Fleet, and the Russian battleships were ready to intercept anything flying from the US ships towards N. Korea.

However, this Russia’s strategy won’t work if war is initiated by the South Korea, or by the US special forces dressed as South Koreans or Chinese troops.

7. Ongoing war on Yemen.

8. The US has lost the war on Syria, but they plan to transfer their surviving proxy troops into Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan and India.

9. Blockade of Qatar.

10. Blaming Russia for supplying arms to Taliban, to make Russia and Afghan government cooperation impossible.

11. Blaming Russia for supplying North Korea with ICBM technologies, which has been written into plan in 2012.

North Korean spies were arrested in Ukraine in 2011 for trying to obtain these technologies. The arrests and convictions were made by the Ukrainian security services when Yanukovich still was a president. After the Maidan putsch, SBU raided the RD-250 rocket engines manufacturer and seized all its technological documents.

12.”Operational Environments to 2028″ names Azerbaijan as one of the future war zones.

13. As a pretext for war, Pentagon planed in 2012 to blame Pakistan for “WMD proliferation, direct threat to the Homeland, terrorist organizations, and regional tensions with India.”

14. The plan also predicts the Cold War with China and a proxy military conflict using India’s military and the US SOF and proxies acting from Afghanistan.

“It is unlikely that the U.S. will face China in armed conflict over the forecast period. However, China’s military strength and technological prowess will manifest beyond its borders in other ways that will significantly impact the U.S. Army. A mercantilist version of the Cold War is a potential outcome from China’s rise.”

15. China’s cooperation with North Korea, Sudan, Iran, Burma, Venezuela, and others contributes significantly to the proliferation of anti-access capabilities that “will threaten the ability of the U.S. Army to deploy and sustain in key regions of the world.” In human language, defense cooperation between countries “threatened” the US capability to attack and destroy those countries.

16.In 2012, the US didn’t see Germany and the EU among four most powerful, economies: the US, China, India and Japan. An indication that back in 2012, there were already plans to destroy the economies of the EU and Germany.

17. The US keeps undertaking steps “to minimize perceptions of American military “occupation”.”

18. In 2012 Pentagon also planned in relations to Russia to trigger a war between Russia and China:

“Russia is also facing a general decline in military capabilities and is struggling to fund and implement a sweeping set of military reforms that would slash the size of ineffective reserve forces, stockpiles of antiquated equipment, a bloated officer corps, and military bureaucracy, while simultaneously transforming the armed forces into a professional force with modern weapons, doctrine, and enhanced readiness. Russian military doctrine is still focused on the core mission of a large Asian land war, with China.”

19. In 2012 Pentagon planned that post-2020, after Putin leaves by their estimates, NATO will be able to start an occupation of Russia.

“Future deterioration in Russia’s security environment could eventually (post-2020) lead to increased dialogue and mil-mil relations with Russia, potentially leading to combined training or small-scale combined operations with Russian ground forces in the Arctic, the Caucasus, or Central Asia.”

In the US terms “combined operations” is something only possible under the conditions of NATO invasion.

20. The true reason why the US funded NGO continue aiding to the migrant flow in Europe and why the US interfering with the energy security of the European countries: to create conditions for military intervention in Europe.

“There are no likely scenarios requiring a U.S. limited intervention over the next decade. Later in the forecast period (2025-2030) there is a possibility that population declines and continuing financial weakness will seriously erode social and economic conditions in some European states, leading to widespread collapse in civil order, failure of national governments, or humanitarian crises due to natural disasters that weakened states are unable to contend with. “

21. IRREGULAR WARFARE in and against Russia

“U.S. Army involvement in irregular warfare in the Europe/Russia region during the forecast period appears unlikely.” ” One exception that could arise late in the forecast period would involve a request by a weakened Russia for NATO assistance to stabilize key oil producing regions upon which Europe depends.”

As of now, the US is conducting an irregular war against Ukraine for three years, and it will go on in perpetuity.

One last thing stated in the 20-year plan is the CULTURAL PERCEPTION OF TIME.

“Western cultures tend to have a view of time that is concrete and short-term, whereas Eastern cultures are more likely to focus on the long term and make decisions accordingly.”

“If one party is working from a five-year plan and its opponent is working from a twenty-year plan, the first party will find itself at a distinct disadvantage.”

“If the opponent sees time in terms of centuries, then the first has already lost. Unless the first party achieves total control through either annihilation or conquest and assimilation, its opponent will simply wait until the opportune time—be that ten, fifty, or two hundred years later—and then reassert itself.”

According to this plan by 2018 we should expect wars in Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq and Libya to continue as launch pads for the wars in Iran, China, Korean Peninsula, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and Nigeria. War on China has started using India as a proxy, and later by the US will interfere directly or via proxies in Afghanistan.

Ongoing collapse of the European economies with the US acting as a stabilizing military force against civil disobedience.

Russia’s economy being weakened by the devastation of its trading partners in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

The end of the doctrine of nation building means that the regions devastated by the US will be maintained in a state of devastation in perpetuity to promote collapse of neighboring countries.

If the ideology of globalism is synonymous with globalization which includes outsourcing, one of the increasingly overt signs of globalist information operations is outsourcing to foreigners the task of questioning the loyalties of and smearing Americans. We see this in the highly publicized Hamilton68 project of the German Marshall Fund, which began as an Atlanticist think tank in Germany during the Cold War and has now expanded its remit after the alleged Russian ‘attack on American democracy’, to calling Americans tweeting that they want National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster fired dupes of the Kremlin. Yet the GMF is a foreign funded think tank which, like the Atlantic Council, receives money from foreign governments.

When Americans tweeted about the hypocrisy of politicians like Sen. John McCain denouncing neo-Nazis rallying in Charlottesville while ignoring Ukro-Nazi violence and overt use of Hitlerian symbols like the 2nd SS Das Reich division’s wolsfangel in Ukraine, the Atlantic Council responded with ‘whataboutism’. Rather than defend Kiev’s Azov Battalion or the Svoboda Party leaders McCain and then Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland hobnobbed with, Atlantic Council writer Donara Barojan attacked the messengers, pushing the ‘alt-right equals Russian agents’ line Hamilton 68 and The Washington Post routinely promote. Ms. Barojan is of course, not an American citizen, but appears from her LinkedIn CV to be Lithuanian. What qualifies her to label American citizens like Infowars host Alex Jones as Russian dupes, label Twitter competitor Gab.ai an ‘alt right echo chamber’, or promote tweets labeling the recently ousted counselor to the president Steve Bannon as somehow sympathetic to neo-Nazis Bannon denounced as ‘losers’ is not clear. Ms. Barojan is joined in the byline of the piece by Ben Nimmo, a former member of NATO’s press office after several years at Germany’s DPA. Mr. Nimmo’s best Internet claim to fame appears to be attacking the ‘Russia wants war, look how close they put their country to our bases’ meme.

What is clear is that Ms. Barojan is one of many European think tankers and EU propagandists like the EU Stratcom task force’s Jakub Kalensky or KremlinWatch program director Jakub Janda, who routinely attack President Donald Trump and his supporters on Twitter as Russian assets. Bellingcat’s Eliot Higgins, a British citizen funded by Google and the Atlantic Council, also uses his Twitter feed to label Trump and his supporters as vile racists.

Why should any of this matter? Because the Atlantic Council already receives U.S. and NATO government funding, and with the recently passed ‘Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act’ sponsored by Sens. Rob Portman (R-OH) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) they’re all likely to receive more of your tax payer dollars to say how much they hate you and your president, Mr. Trump voting American. While the U.S. government produced Cold War propaganda and paid off reporters to advance it during the Operation Mockingbird era of the 1950s through 70s, never before in American history have so many ‘deplorable’ Americans paid with their tax dollars to be insulted as useful idiots for the Kremlin.

While Hamilton68 does not name the full 600 accounts it claims to monitor for ‘Kremlin disinformation’, that hasn’t stopped mainstream media outlets Reuters and National Public Radio from uncritically reporting its findings. The problem of U.S. taxpayer funding for anti-Russian and anti-Trump agitprop abroad into groups like the German Marshall Fund, Bellingcat coming back home into globalist and Democratic Party linked G-NGOs like the Atlantic Council and New America Foundation is one few Trump supporters seem to be aware of. However, with the EU Stratcom task force having already attacked Breitbart and the Steve Bannon led conservative populist magazine being a frequent target of the ‘fighting Russian disinformation’ crowd, it seems likely that the former counselor to the president Mr. Bannon will become all too aware that his globalist adversaries aren’t exactly hiding their agendas to shut him up behind a Cold War 2 veneer in short order.

the Kulak

The Essential Saker II: Civilizational Choices and Geopolitics / The Russian challenge to the hegemony of the AngloZionist Empire

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to get more info on formatting

(1) Leave the name field empty if you want to post as Anonymous. It's preferable that you choose a name so it becomes clear who said what. E-mail address is not mandatory either. The website automatically checks for spam. Please refer to our moderation policies for more details. We check to make sure that no comment is mistakenly marked as spam. This takes time and effort, so please be patient until your comment appears. Thanks.

(2) 10 replies to a comment are the maximum.

(3) Here are formating examples which you can use in your writing:
<b>bold text</b> results in bold text
<i>italic text</i> results in italic text
(You can also combine two formating tags with each other, for example to get bold-italic text.)
<em>emphasized text</em> results in emphasized text
<strong>strong text</strong> results in strong text
<q>a quote text</q> results in a quote text (quotation marks are added automatically)
<cite>a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited</cite> results in:a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited
<blockquote>a heavier version of quoting a block of text...</blockquote> results in:

a heavier version of quoting a block of text that can span several lines. Use these possibilities appropriately. They are meant to help you create and follow the discussions in a better way. They can assist in grasping the content value of a comment more quickly.

and last but not least:
<a href=''http://link-address.com''>Name of your link</a> results in Name of your link

(4)No need to use this special character in between paragraphs:&nbsp;You do not need it anymore. Just write as you like and your paragraphs will be separated.The "Live Preview" appears automatically when you start typing below the text area and it will show you how your comment will look like before you send it.

(5) If you now think that this is too confusing then just ignore the code above and write as you like.

The mistake of voters is thinking that their domestic political leader (Trump, in this instance) has any influence within an empire. Empires are not run by countries or nations, but by individuals. The ‘deep state’ is the machinery of empire. Your President never had any jurisdiction over them.

Elections are by plebs and for plebs. Aspirant imperial rulers don’t use elections. They use knives.

Trump has realised that he is not king of anything that matters to the empire, so he has fired his pleb friends and is trying to lick his way up the leg of the devil. Once a shyster, always a shyster.

But of course Sheikh Imran would see his enemy as Hindus. It has been ever thus with Sufis since the first time the muslim conquests broke into the subcontinent.

I know Saker is friends with the Sheikh but having seen his content on YouTube I think legitimate questions can be asked regarding his rhetoric that alludes to final Islamic conquest over the Hindu unbelievers.

Btw, ordinary Indians regardless of religion have no issue with Chinese or anyone else. Both major political parties are controlled entities as the British Empire never left India, it just left local brown faces in to be the public face of its interests.

Scott, you severely miss the point in this. China is not blameless at all. I do not doubt Putin and co. know all this and more.

Namaste Anonymous
No offence meant. I am neither hindu or muslim. The actual quote the sheikh uses from the koran is ” You will find that the bitterest in their enmity to the faithful are the Jews and the polytheists; the nearest in affection to them are those who say “We are Christians” That is because there are priests among them
and because they are free from pride” Al Ma’Idah 82.
I have no personal bias in this. With all respects

In defense of Sufis—-In N India when aggressive Islam of the Persian ilk started its foray into India it was met by a coalition of “deplorables” which were a motley crew of low caste, mainly farmers and craftsmen, both Hindus and Sufis. Yep, Sufi. 10% or more of the holy book of the Sikh religion is direct poem-songs of various Sufis. My favorite is Kabir who was one of those kick-a–, turn-over-the-tables-of-the-money-lenders type person. Ornery saint–a bit crazed.

What developed was a resistance, warrior religion–highly disciplined and highly ethical– called Sikh Dharma. Now for Pakistan to invade India the shortest route is through the Sikh Punjab: It’s just not going to happen. They are the Cossacks of India.

Neither Pakistan nor China are per se “good guys” in this world scenario because both countries are run by elites that will play for their own best deal and neither enjoy the support of an informed, popular base. It all depends on the needs and imperative of the historical moment. And I agree now with Edgar Cayce—the peace of the world will belong in the hands of Russia if they jettison Communism. Turns out he is looking more correct as each moment ticks away these days.

So attempting to tar Sheik Hossein just does not work…Sufis generally get it in the neck from the Islamic establishment.

How silly and self-destructive it is of Modi’s Indian government to change their position of neutrality to one of subservience to Western interests, while risking first-hand a massive war against two of its neighbors, China and Pakistan. I can’t see how this can benefit India in the long term. Conflicts zones are spreading all over the world, like mushrooms. How sad.

Yes, why has Modi done this?
Does it have something to do with domestic politics?

The hardening of the line within the Hindu faction, becoming more and more like fundamentalist Christianity and fund. Islam?
Getting domestic policical control via militarized Hinduism?
Is ti all part of Modi’s personal power trip?
Just wondering where some dots are that might be connectable.

These are great questions. I’ve found in the past that the Indians leave very few dots out in the open, for observers to connect. Especially for non-Indian observers. This is one significant cultural difference that I’ve run into between India and Canada (where I’m from). Twice, I’ve drawn conclusions about Modi that I was confident in only to discover that I’ve misread the situation entirely. Simply, Indian society does not seem to feel compelled to freely share political information with everyone – not at all.

I do think that Hinduism is mischaracterized as polytheistic. Having different images of God is not the same as believing in more than one God. Also, seeing India as homogenous due to Hinduism is similar to seeing the Middle East as homogenous because of Islam, in my view. I did visit India briefly and was struck by the enormous complexity of Indian culture. I couldn’t imagine how a central government could manage it!

India and China, and many others, think that they are very smart and can play the US against Russia to get better deals from both sides. Big mistake. Russia’s first offer is always the best, and the Americans act in terms of “What’s yours is mine, and what’s mine is mine.”

If India, China and others, will keep bargaining instead of being fair and square with the Russians, it all will end with only two countries standing and everyone else in ruins.

Scott, if you want to understand India and China you have to look at past experiences and the results of revolutions. There are nationalist factions who seem to deal with Russia well, globalist factions, and some who just like bribes to signoff of Israeli or French or American hardware, in India’s case. These countries do not have full control of themselves. Indias leadership is a joke in many ways. And China’s OBOR is not what the rhetoric seems it. Look beyond the rhetoric and you will see just neo colonial interests.

Scott, having read your report about India, what will happen within the SCO? I am sure many readers are aware of Modi’s close links to Israel from before he became PM and which have continued with his recent visit to Israel. India is also a member of the BRICS with China and Russia. Has India, by moving away from its historic Non Aligned status under Modi, a viper in the nest? Or are they playing both sides under his stewardship?

As both Pakistan and India are members of the SCO and the US is already threatening Pakistan with their new Afghanistan policy – how will this impact? The US it seems to me is using India to disrupt the OBOR initiative.

It’s obvious that the OBOR has to go across the territory of Russia and via its Northern Sea route.
With these new wars brewing, China would have to shelve its plans to build the Silk Road to Europe around Russia.

Thanks for the link on the amazing icebreaking LNG carrier–this is something I have definitely not seen before! A vessel of this type is definitely a “curveball” when it comes to the other conventional ships plying the well-traveled sea lanes.

These Globalist Neocon psycopaths are paving the road for the coming of the antichrist there is no other explanation for the diabolical nature of their schemes other than the prophecies of the End Times as written in Holy Scripture. These are demonically possessed people driven by satanic power.

I wouldn’t go conform with anything of “old scriptures” as too much can be attributed to different times (and has been done in the past already!).

However, I would say that those warmongers are contributors to the desaster of our environment – pollution of air, water and soil.
The air on our globe can just go around, the soil will bear all the “misdeeds” for several thousand of years some also for millions or even billions and the seas have already dead spots.

I just wonder how the majority of the earth’ population is still in a “sleep mode” and/or idleness instead of thinking that our earth belongs to us all and we live on it.
Or to better say: just hoping that anything/-one from outside our globe will do what we as the earth’s population should do.
Nobody will rescue us – we have only the chance to rescue ourselves by being united. We have got an excellent brain to think – thanks to the evolution (or if some are believers in God, but even believers should respect our nature and its creations) for which we should be thankful and therefore use our brains !!
I think it would be our duty to do that – for the sake of coming generations and in honor of our wonderful creative world and our universe.

As this will not happen
… alas ….

However, in regard of history things usualy play itself out. States without a good economy cannot stand forever even if its military power is unrivaled (speaking of military places not military equipments).
Hopefully our environment will not be too much damaged from unnecessary wars.

Thanks for this great summarize of the US neocons plan for the next several years.

However, I think this plan maybe looks good only for those pleople who created this plan.
But to speak clear: it lacks taking into account different cultures, it lacks our times where more and more information circles around and most of all: more and more countries see what those necons/USA/bankers/military complexes and security complexes are creating.
Even if not all countries – like USA – get through MSM reliable information – there will always be enough people who get and can spread it.

Our times are different and will more different in ten years.
All the “creations” and “deaths” are visible and cannot buried as easily as it was in former times.

Change usually comes from a small group – and also from countries with different ways of thinking and a different cultural background.

The USA is usually lacking genough sensible informations about other cultures. (For example: Egyptians have throughout their history not the same excess in murdering like the Romans had; and concerning the Taliban which had been made great by USA: -whether I like them or not – those people are still defending their country against a superpower USA !! and this for more than ten years !! which I find remarkable!)

What USA deep state and neocons believe is that everybody is willing to do anything for money.
Or under some pressure if money doesn’t work.

However, I personally think lack in cultural informations as well as in the point that not everybody is willing to take bribary together with nowaydays visible “results” of US deep state and neocon’s interventions will maybe do a good job and dismantle neocons/US itself (not to forget the ecnomic side of USA which is just a desaster!).

wesley clark is a jew. Neocon PNAC: Project for the New American Century – American Empire – and f*** everybody else. The arrogance and pride of the US is evidentially leading to its downfall. And the US is s*** scared of Eurasia, as it will eclipse the Americas, population of 5:1.

They are scared of this axis, you are right. So. in the policy forums of of the US Imperial culture of death and debt, what is not to like about sparking a deadly war between two populous countries, like India and China? The more dead the better, as they see it.

The weakness in the military plan above is in fact the ungovernable character of contemporary India and Pakistan. Such was the destruction of the traditional infrastructure of India by the East India Company, that it is not possible to govern them without being in charge of the entire bureaucracy, and running the whole thing imperially, from outside, with the empire’s own non-native people.

In short, a pop gun war between these two is a fantasy, because the Indians don’t have intact chains of command to feed, arm or make and army stand in line for more than a week.

My compliments on the article. Very accurate. I can only add that the Washington political elite, the Pentagon and Wall Street have lost all sense of reality. They have acquired imperial tastes, and they want the rest of the world to accept them. The latest sanctions against Russia, which also target European firms, were a nasty shock to Europe. Instead of driving a wedge between Russia and Western Europe, these sanctions will do the opposite, as the US is now perceived as an immature state which is no longer responsible for it’s actions. Vladimir Putin and Russia are now looked upon as the sane force in the world.

This is one topic that I thought for sure I understood (with appropriate outrage) only to back away from. I’d be very, very wary of North American commentary on this.

Nowhere is the conjoined CIA/billionaire-tech-community-complex’s imperial lust, and absolute confidence of supremacy, more openly displayed than in India. Just a segment of the American nobility bringing backwards, polytheistic India into the 21st century. Simple, right?

This just reeks of hubris and seems destined to bite the high-tech/CIA complex squarely in the assets, Crimean style. How? I don’t know. Russia probably knows.

America: “France does not know, but we are at war with America. Yes, a permanent war, a vital war, an economic war, a war without death apparently. Yes, they are very tough Americans, they are voracious, they want an undivided power over the world. It is an unknown war, a permanent war, apparently without death and a war to the death. “

It gets worse. Putin’s ‘reward’ for inviting the demonic jewish terrorist leaders to Russia, so he could ‘bend the knee’ and be lectured by them about the ‘sub-Human’ Iranians, and how the zionists would not tolerate any effective defensive activity by them was thus. A declaration today that zionist America would start providing lethal military assistance of all types to the neo-nazis of Ukraine.

Putin chose to act weak, so once again the Deep State took the opportunity to treat him as a weakling.

This is how the game is played. Turn the other cheek when your opponent slaps you, and your opponent immediately prepares a punch. Take that blow unflinching, and its the knife. Claim the wound hasn’t hurt, and the gun comes out. Putin’s idiotic strategy only escalates things- and this is why being ‘passive’ and ‘understanding’ with the wrong people makes the world a vastly more dangerous place.

After the meeting with the jewish terrorists, Putin’s spokesperson stated that Russia agreed with the zionist demons, and also wanted Iran out of Syria eventually. Who amongst us doesn’t feel like throwing up every time Putin creeps to these monsters?

Team Clinton is laughing hysterically at the mistakes of Russia, and rushes to turn the screws even harder. China is now complaining that US sanctions that tell Chinese companies who they may or may not do business with are starting to bite hard- but what can China do? The US marketplace is still the major growth factor for most hi-tech Chinese companies- and these companies used licensed West IP. Russia plays an awful diplomatic hand, and helps China’s cause not one whit. Russia crawls to Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egytpt and Israel, despite each of these four being 100% direct assets of the West.

China knows Russia has the biggest ‘muscles’ but sees Russia never acts like a ‘strong’ man- instead Russia acts like a well mannered, thoughtful but timid giant. Russia is a lousy ally for China since Russia never chooses to stand as an ***equal*** to the West. Russia agrees that Israel stands for the ‘master race’. Russia agrees that the wahhabi slavers of Saudi Arabia are entitled to pollute the muslim world. Russia agrees that the West is ‘above the law’. And China cannot understand this servile frame of mind by a nation which, in ***theory*** should sit at the ‘high table’ an equal.

Put in its simplest terms, China cannot understand why Russia chooses to be complicit in the West’s intent to trigger another World War. For China, Man should be in another golden age of trade and tech/societal advancement. But the West is run by demons, and Russia is apparently happy with always meeting the demons half-way.

Now I’m responding to an article that makes the usual mistake of a ‘bottom up’ analysis. When the zionist propaganda masters target ‘smart’ people, they always do so with a sea of ***micro-details***, exploiting the ‘nerd’ psychological flaw of a love of bottom-up analysis. That’s why the ‘proper’ newspapers contain so many wordy articles. Why the ‘grown-up’ political TV shows have so many mouthy talking heads. To trap the foolish into spending all their time chewing the cud of details designed to miss the big picture.

But the really smart thinkers don’t allow their eye to be taked off the ball. This means one must always think top down. ***Goal oriented*** thinking. The means that may get to that goal can change and change and change and change. But only fools think the changes imply the goal has altered. Using Wikileaks and agent Assange to drive ‘colour revolutions’ is yesterday’s news.

Look, here’s a free clue. A bad sniper always trails the target, or at best is on the target. But a good sniper ***leads*** the target. In other words the foolish talk about what the demons have been doing or are doing, not what they are about to do. And the foolish are led to behaving in such a foolish way cos the foolish want easy ‘facts’ to ‘analyse’, and that means reading zionist controlled outlets to gather these ‘facts’.

But the top down view shows the current methods of the Deep State that work best are going to be the methods of the immediate future. And these methods are best described as more ‘turns of the screw’.

1) more sanctions on Russia, Iran, and those entities that wish to do business with either. Putin has allowed the USA and West Europe to build up a pseudo-legal framework of sanction activity against Russia and Russian interests. Yet an Empire power must never allow another Empire power to treat it thus. And Putin rewards the abuse of Russia by the West by supporting the West in the UN (see N Korea vote for yet another example), and by supporting the most evil West assets like Saudi Arabia and Israel.

2) more demonisation of Putin and Russia in the media.

3) more aggressive NATO military activity in the nations around Russia.

In other words, the knife going into the body of Russia over and over. It ***does not matter*** what the precise forms of the means used for 1,2 and 3 are. The West will do whatever seems to work best at the time. What matters is that Putin continues to allow it, and does not choose to strike back.

If Putin had lanced the boil in Ukraine, for instance, Trump could not now be using Ukraine to hurt Russia once again. And where are those people that said Putin must not invade Ukraine and help the nation peacefully partition. Yes they were the same people who told you the sanctions on Russia would be gone in a year.

Look at Syria. For years Russia sat back and let Syria fester, with the usual suspects praising Putin for not getting involved in another ‘Afghanistan’. Yet eventually Russia had no choice- and when it finally went in it soon found it had to commit enough time and forces to get the job done properly- which it has done. But how would it have been if Russia had intervened right at the beginning, and crushed the West’s wahhabi terror gangs before they had a chance to ravage most of Syria?

Ukraine is identical. Had Putin gone in on day one, Ukraine would now be partitioned and at peace, and the West would have no current leverage there. Crimea wouldn’t be an issue. An empire power should never leave a problem to fester on its border under the excuse of short term fallout over neccessary action.

You see no matter what Russia does or does not do, the zionist press will say Russia is monsterous for the choice- so Russia has absolutely nothing to lose in that regard. And the Deep State will use its poisonous influence wherever it can on our planet- so that is a constant too, no matter what form the current demonic strategy takes.

Good must understand itself, and not define itself in terms of evil. Good must not question itself or ask how the most correct good actions may be judged. And true evil has absolutely no limits, as Israel proved in Gaza or Britain proved when arranging the murder of an aircraft full of Russian military musicians flying to an even celebrating the liberation of Aleppo. Good shouldn’t even think about evil when planning the right moves.

This is why Man’s oldest stories warn about the siren voice of the devil. Listen to the devil- think about the devil- try to understand the devil- and the devil wins. If, on the other hand, you act in the name of good for the sake of goodness alone, you defeat the devil. Putin should have gone into Ukraine on day one. He should have supported Assad from day one. He should have provided Iran with the best air defense systems on day one. And Putin should stand with China, so China and Russia can declare that no other power on Earth will be allowed to judge them or sanction them.

But Putin chooses instead to listen to the devil. Not because he is bad- but because he mistakenly thinks this is what it means to be ‘reasonable’. But you cannot reason with the devil. The devil talks to analyse you- to spot weaknesses and exploit them.

You want to make the devil truly angry? Then you are good ***not*** in response to evil, but good in the name of goodness. You act because you know it is the right thing to do, not caring one whit what the foolish or forces of evil will say about you.

The bottom up analysis of the Deep State is ‘listening to the devil’. And in all the millions of words of pseudo-intellectual nonsense, the devil will find cracks in your resolve.

Don’t believe me? Take WW2. In the run up to that war, trillions of words of pseudo-intellectual analysis were expended everywhere the chattering classes gathered. But nothing good was learned- and no-one today tries to understand WW2 by reading the dribble that filled the ‘proper’ newspapers for more than a decade before. The only valuable insight was the top down analysis- ie., there is going to be a war because the powers that matter want it, and the powers that could oppose them are fatally distracted. The Deep State prepared for world war in every way that mattered, and crafted a road to war- just like we see today.

But there is one difference then to now. In the 30s, the West was a force without an equal. Britain had created the Frankenstein’s Monster that is the USA- and that nation was unrivalled in WW1, and had become exponentially more powerful in the 1930s. America led the Second Industrial Revolution, and had fully embraced the idea of the military industrial complex. And the USA had a dynamic inventive and free society that made Russia, Germany and Japan at the time look like very poor jokes.

Today things are very different. Nukes level the playing field when push comes to shove. The Internet breaks the cultural isolation of populations. The Age of the Computer is a gift to everyone. Russia and China are not WW2 Japan and Germany. Russia and China have the option to be the absolute equals to the West. But to do so Russia and China must not allow themselves to suffer ‘divide and conquer’- and must never, ever ever allow the West to push them around. This means Russia and China ***must*** define sanctions by the West agaisnt them as an ‘act of war’.

Operation ‘faintheart’ has been allowed to go on for far too long. Even the dimest bulb can now see the rewards reaped by Russia when it chooses to be fainthearted. And China despairs at what it can do with a fainthearted Russia, knowing that when Russia forces China to stand alone, China has to make very bad compomises with the West.

A fainthearted Russia allows the West to subject Russia to a thousand cuts- allowing fools to spend an infinite number of hours studying the form and nature of those cuts. But a smart person responds by ensuring they are not cut again in the future. The lesson of a cut is not repeating the behaviour that got you cut in the first place. Top down, not bottom up.

I think your conclusion about Russia/Putin and China is wrong.
Both countries work together very well with a lot of activities and big contracts.
The sanctions put by USA onto Russia did a very good job for Russia: its agricultural economy started to put more power into its possibilities. Alone to Europe about 36.7 % more gas had been delivered as in previous years.

Both Putin and Xi aren’t arrogant persons: their actions are well thought through.

The kind of thinking “one slap should result that the other persons is slaping back” is pure Western thought.

Whereas if you have been slapped and offer the other cheek for another slap the agressor thinks automatically that you are very weak. The logic is that the agressors hypocrisy and arrogance will swell more and more and thus overshadow proper way of thinking. Improper and not thought through decisions will surely follow and any fruit desired by the agressor cannot be achieved.
The other person is well aware of the fault lines and will redirect failures to the agressor with pure satisfaction.

Don’t forget Putin is well versed in Karate – to my knowledge. The thinking of Eastern philosophy is most Western politicans extremely alien. In Karate you are observing your counterpart and only after that you will act. This observation includes not only the person itself as well its surroundings.
This is necessary in order to achieve the desired result (in this case victory).

That’s my point of view – time will tell. Both countries want to avoid any direct clash and China will surely not allow that its great project (reviving and adapting to our times the Old Silk route) has to be abandoned.

Indias Modi is somehow really “moody” and has the aspiration of reviving the great “Hindu times”.
However, Modi is in good terms with Russia.

“Putin should have gone into Ukraine on day one. He should have supported Assad from day one. He should have provided Iran with the best air defense systems on day one. And Putin should stand with China, so China and Russia can declare that no other power on Earth will be allowed to judge them or sanction them.

But Putin chooses instead to listen to the devil. Not because he is bad- but because he mistakenly thinks this is what it means to be ‘reasonable’. But you cannot reason with the devil. The devil talks to analyse you- to spot weaknesses and exploit them.”

What, precisely, was ‘day one’ in Ukraine? Spring of ’13 when the first public rumblings of a coup began to appear? August of ’13 when the intent for a coup was obvious? February ’14 when the coup reached fruition in betrayal, fire and death? Late March of ’14 when the first resistance appeared in Donetsk and Lughansk Oblasti? And what was President Putin to do, send in an army that was not quite ready?

What, precisely, was ‘day one’ in Syria? The day the provocateurs shot and killed that pretty woman in the midst of a street demonstration? When US/EU began to bomb SAA openly? When the murderous ‘opposition’ to the ‘Assad Regime’ started to slaughter civilians wholesale? Or was it the day President Assad asked President Putin for assistance and by that one request made Russia the only foreign armed force legally in Syria, all the rest including US/EU therefore being in open violation if international law and ‘UN’ regulations?

What, precisely, was ‘day one’ in Iran? The day the Shah fled? The day the ayatollah died? The day the IRG first began to openly help President Assad in Syria at his request?

President Putin acts when he wants and he has made very clear on numerous occasions that there will never again be fighting on Russian land. Period. He has also proved beyond doubt that when needed Russia will move with alacrity and rectify a situation with the required amount of violence, witness Gruzya in ’08 when 50 some Russian peace keepers in Gruzya were slaughtered as were 1602 civilians in the capitol of South Ossetia by the ruthless bombardment from Gruzya commencing at 01:00 on 08.08.08.

Perhaps you forget that when the first round of sanctions were imposed on Russia supposedly for the residents of Krimu and Sevastopol voting to leave the coup d’etat government in Kiev and return to Russia, President Putin waited until the early fall harvest of ’14 was in full swing and thousands of heavy trucks and rail cars were on their way to Russia with the bountiful harvest of EU, only to be stopped at the Russian borders and turned back as President Putin instituted counter sanctions. The screams from EU, poland in particular, were heard on Mars.

Since you obviously know President Putin so well as to know what he thinks, why are you talking to us instead of giving President Putin the timely benefit of your intelligent, experienced and educated guiding hand?

The US has “a professional force with modern weapons, doctrine, and enhanced readiness”, and they can not win a war. Iraq, Afganistan, Somalia, Vietnam, any country bigger than Grenada and the sophisticated US military simply can not produce a victory.

Perhaps the professional military the Americans adore does not live up to the hype.

The Pindos adore brutal murder abroad as a way of sustaining their decadent way of life at the expense of the world’s non-exceptional, dispensable majority (as well as sheer entertainment). A good Pindo soldier hates life; simple as that.

Why Azerbaijan? Is that the weak link or just geographically closer to the Russian underbelly and Caspian Sea? Or are the drug trade/smuggler routes totally run by CIA and thus more secure there? It would seem that with Iran and Armenia in alliance with Russia that even with Georgia ‘s ( is it NATO yet?) aid,The government couldn’t resist the “little green men” who could secure it quick enough if need be. Although then NATO would aggressively intervene in Georgia in response.

OK so Georgia needs be dealt with first and fairly soon within the next 2 years.

Hmmm. So there is a long term “plan” for Azerbaijan? I can see NKarabak being stirred up again, then weapon supplies to Azerbaijan for “defense” etc. etc.

Let’s put two and two together. In 2001 the Northern Alliance fought side by side with the US Military against the largely Pashtun Taliban. The Taliban had torched the Poppy fields and still does. It is reported by several knowledgeable sources that Poppy, Heroin and Opium production has skyrocketed since the US intervention in Afghanistan. Thus, it follows that the Northern Alliance is an umbrella organization for the Northern tribal drug lords. In this scenario, the Taliban is seen as a moralizing force in spite of the rumour of Pashtun boy sex deviant preference. [This could be true or could be anti Taliban propaganda]. What are the chances that the US presence could ever be acceptable to the Pashtun tribes?

The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) strategy consists of wining hearts and minds with a promise to invest in infrastructure resulting in mutual growth of wealth and prosperity. This is a win win proposition. Trump is moving from so called nation building to straight out colonialism as part of a larger strategy to slow down or block the economic rise of China. In this case, the hegemon cannot compete with China and thus positions itself as a spoiler creating chaos and destruction in its path. It accomplishes it is objectives by bribes or blunt force (By hook or crook). This is a lose lose proposition. Which of these two strategies may win over a long period of time?

Re: “7 countries in 5 years”. Those same 7 countries are found in “The Oded Yinon Plan for ‘Greater Israel’ from the Nile to the Euphrates”. The Empire’s plan for the ‘Great Game’ as outlined by Halford Mackinder in 1904 was just what The Empire needed to attack Russia (“the Heartland”) from the south. Hopefully both those plans have failed.

Sitemap

Saker Android App

An Android App has been developed by one of our supporters. It is available for download and install by clicking on the Google Play Store Badge above.

All the original content published on this blog is licensed by Saker Analytics, LLC under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). For permission to re-publish or otherwise use non-original or non-licensed content, please consult the respective source of the content.