Smart Ads

Thursday, January 10, 2013

GMA Network addresses all issues raised by Sarah Lahbati

GMA Network addresses all issues raised by Sarah Lahbati – starting from her posts in the social networking and microblogging site Twitter, which were eventually picked-up by the press.

The Network maintains its stand that Sarah Lahbati violated her contract, as follows:

“Sarah Lahbati’s Artist Management Contract with GMA Network is effective until February 21, 2015. There is no provision for leave of absence in said contract. Any leave is subject to prior agreement between the Network and Sarah. Therefore, Sarah’s unilateral decision to go on leave, despite its earlier disapproval by the Network, is a violation of her contract with the Network. Further, her declared trip to Switzerland for an indefinite period, without the prior consent and approval of the Network, will be an additional violation of her contract.”

“Despite the rejection of her leave, she ceased to honor her commitments with the Network including her being part of the Network’s Sunday variety show Party Pilipinas. Under the provisions of her contract with the Network, specifically Paragraphs 1.3 and 1.4, it is clearly stated that the ‘artist shall perform the role and appear in the television programs, projects and events assigned to her, and conscientiously fulfill faithfully and promptly any and all engagements/booking contracted to her by GMA.’”

Sarah asked to be released from her contract with GMA Artist Center (GMAAC).

It must be clarified that GMAAC has no legal personality apart from the Network, and that Sarah’s contract is with GMA Network and not with GMAAC. In the same way that a contract requires the mutual consent of the two parties, there cannot also be a unilateral cancellation of the contract by Sarah alone.

For any violation of her contract with GMA, Paragraph 5.2 states that “In the event of violation by artist… GMA may, in addition to and without prejudice to any other remedy, recover liquidated damages from artist in the amount equivalent to double artist’s minimum guarantee.”

Regarding the issue of the supposed referral by some Network executives to ICONS Management, the Network reiterates its earlier statement that it did not authorize the co-management contract with ICONS Management. Concrete actions have been taken and penalties have been imposed on the executives who were found liable.

The Network found no proof of her allegation that there was an “under the table” deal between GMAAC and ICONS Management. The Network has a policy of prohibiting and penalizing any such “under the table” deal between any of its executives and employees and others dealing with the Network. This policy is strictly enforced and implemented.

If Sarah can prove later her accusation against ICONS and GMAAC, the Network will not only stop dealing with ICONS but will also penalize those who are guilty of such anomaly.

Sarah also mentioned that non-ICONS talents like her are treated unfairly. The Network’s substantial investment in her easily belies this. On top of her being a home-grown exclusive talent of GMA, whom the Network developed, trained and promoted, she is also one of the Network’s priority stars.

GMA artists like Marian Rivera, Dingdong Dantes, Heart Evangelista, Jennylyn Mercado, and other bigger stars than Sarah who are also non-ICONS talents are not complaining about the treatment they are getting from the Network.

Interestingly, it was after the Network required Sarah to cancel her illegal co-management contract with Royal Era Entertainment & Artist Management of Annabelle Rama, the mother of Sarah’s current boyfriend, Richard Gutierrez, that she unilaterally declared her going on a one-month leave of absence and started to complain about GMAAC. The co-management contract violated the exclusive terms of Sarah’s contract with the Network. GMA Network would have had no choice but to sue Sarah and Royal Era Entertainment for the said breach had they refused to rescind said co-management contract.

Sarah also tweeted that GMA has yet to pay her for the movie “Basement.” “I don't owe GMA any money, in fact they still owe me. I finished filming a movie called Basement under GMA films, we started around August-early sept… until now I still haven't been paid not even a down payment. My mother asked my handler many times regarding the payment and until now there is no reply,” tweets Sarah.

It was made clear to Sarah at the onset that her talent fee will be disbursed after she completes filming. The contract was sent to her in mid-October but she was on vacation and the signed contract was returned to GMA Films only on December 14, 2012. But given the Network’s year-end cut-off for payment processing, requests received after December 10 will only be paid on January 11, 2013. As a special concession, however, the check was made available on January 4, 2013. The delay in the processing of her payment can only be attributed to Sarah because she did not immediately return the signed contract to GMA Films.

Sarah also accused GMA of making a one sided story about what’s happening.

There is absolutely no truth to this. HOT TV, thru its researcher Malou Santiago, contacted Sarah’s handler, Monica Carla Sevillano, who, in turn, coordinated with Sarah to get her side before the story was aired. Unfortunately, HOT TV did not receive any response from Sarah.

GMA Network has concluded its investigation on Sarah’s walk-out incident in the taping of the Network’s new primetime program “Indio.”

Based on the said investigation, Sarah, without any justifiable reason and following only the instructions of Annabelle Rama – whom she had illegally signed up then as her co-manager – walked out of the November 9 taping of “Indio” in Morong Park, Subic, Olongapo City.

In her earlier tweets, Sarah mentioned that “GMA Artist Center decided to book me for opening of EAT BULAGA the following day which required me to be in the studio at 8am to do hair, make-up and rehearse the production number. I never walked out, I told the producers and p.a that I need to go because I still had to travel back to Manila from Subic and be at Eat Bulaga studio by 8AM… I did not leave the set, I waited for the producers to say that I can leave… I had permission to leave. This is the complete truth.”

Upon investigation, however, it was found that GMAAC was not aware of any early morning booking on November 10. As confirmed by its records, the only schedule GMAAC had for Sarah on that day was a technical rehearsal for Party Pilipinas set at 4pm. Further, it was on November 24 – two weeks after the walk-out incident – when she finally appeared in “Eat Bulaga.”

Also based on the Network’s investigation, the production team of “Indio” did not give Sarah the permission to leave early. Contrary to what she mentioned in her tweets, they persuaded her to stay and finish her scenes but to no avail. As a result, the production team was forced to pack up the taping and incur substantial, additional and unnecessary costs.

The Network has endorsed the matter to Belo, Gozon, Elma, Parel, Asuncion and Lucila (BGE Law) for the filing of a complaint against Sarah so that the court may determine who between the parties is correct, telling the truth or lying.

After the complaint is filed in court, the Network will no longer publicly comment on the case except through the pleadings filed in court, in compliance with the rule on “sub-judice”, to avoid influencing the decision the court may render on the case.

Sarah alone has been getting all the flak for airing her grievances on twitter. What does that make of her network GMA? Geez, a network run mostly by lawyers, and here you are addressing your network's legal concerns in a gossip blog like this? Up to how many times will you cheapen your resolve? Nakakasawa na kayo, and don't assume we care about your conflict with a starlet! We just don't care!! Wala po bang nagpapayo sa inyo? Just asking.

Somehow there may be some truth to the ICONS issue!! If Sarah has proof then go ahead go to court!! I dont think she will mention Anette Or Arsi if there's no basis!! Sarah is from Switzerland and her family is not poor so what will be her motive? These are quite powerful people she is implicating i am sure she knows who she is dealing with so why make up stories?? If she is pregnant as some are claiming shouldnt she just have left quietly and not go through all these stress??

Yes, true she should've left quietly but instead, she chose to give a kilometric explanation over twitter on why she's leaving. In so doing, all attention focused on her. At the end of the day, those names she mentioned will need evidence before they can truly be implicated. Brat that she is, she did not have the foresight to anticipate this issue escalating. And now she's quiet because maybe, she realizes that she created an expensive problem that even Annabelle cannot fix.

1. Interestingly, there was no categorical denial by GMA that allegedly Atty. Annette Gozon brokered a meeting with ICONS. At the same time, GMA admitted that the concerned executives have been penalized. Why did GMA omit the name of Atty Gozon?

2. GMA said Sarah's act of leaving the set was unjustifiable. But GMA failed to refute Sarah's tweet that she was made to wear that costume and made to wait for more than 12hours already after her call time. With or without the eat bulaga appearance, Sarah was treated inhumanely already.

3. Regarding the late payment of Sarah's fees, GMA claims that it was due to Sarah's late submission of the signed contract. If that was so, why did they start shooting/filming when Sarah hasnt submitted the signed contract yet?

AMEN. You guys have no idea what can happen inside GMA. Before you judge Sarah and believe the bigger fighter here (GMA), know what happens inside the network first. Sarah wouldn't be so brave to mention the two names if it weren't true. I shall repost this statement made above:

1. Interestingly, there was no categorical denial by GMA that allegedly Atty. Annette Gozon brokered a meeting with ICONS. At the same time, GMA admitted that the concerned executives have been penalized. Why did GMA omit the name of Atty Gozon?

-May I add that it is her most likely writing these official statements? FYI.

2. GMA said Sarah's act of leaving the set was unjustifiable. But GMA failed to refute Sarah's tweet that she was made to wear that costume and made to wait for more than 12hours already after her call time. With or without the eat bulaga appearance, Sarah was treated inhumanely already.

-EXACTLY! Unjustifiable? Come on! She's a human being. That's the problem with Philippine showbusiness. There's a tendency to forget celebrities have basic human rights. Unjustifiable? I can't believe they used that word. One word GMA: UNBELIEVABLE!

3. Regarding the late payment of Sarah's fees, GMA claims that it was due to Sarah's late submission of the signed contract. If that was so, why did they start shooting/filming when Sarah hasnt submitted the signed contract yet?