On 23 August 2011 14:41, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>>> Hi all,
>> I did the following cpuset configuration:
>> if [ ! -d /sys/fs/cgroup ]; then
> echo "cgroup not supported by the kernel"
> else
> mount -t cgroup cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup
>> # needed to have the cgroup values inherited from
> # the parent cgroup
> echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.clone_children
>> # create an empty cgroup 'cpu0'
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu0
>> # create an empty cgroup 'cpu1'
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu1
>> # assign cpu number '0' for cgroup cpu0
> echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu0/cpuset.cpus
>> # move outself to this new cgroup
> echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu0
>> # move all the tasks to the cpu0 cgroup
> # kernel threads won't be moved, don't worry about the
> # the errors.
> for i in $(cat /sys/fs/cgroup/tasks); do
> echo $i > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu0/tasks || echo "failed to
> add pid $i/$(cat /proc/$i/comm)"
> done
>> # assign a cpu for cgroup cpu1
> echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu1/cpuset.cpus
>> # make cpu1 exclusive so processes belonging
> # to the other cgroups won't be able to use it.
> echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu1/cpuset.cpu_exclusive
> fi
>>> At this point, most of the processes have been moved to the 'cpu0'
> cgroup and will use the cpu0 only. That does not prevent the cpu1 to be
> used by the kernel threads. Any application launched will run on cpu0 only.
>> After running 10 infinite loops, the cpu accounting gives:
>> cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu0/cpuacct.usage_percpu
> 418943579549 0
>> cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu1/cpuacct.usage_percpu
> 0 0
>> But the system is:
>> cat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuacct.usage_percpu
> 456741213041 30734572583
>
You should get the values before and after your tests and compute the
difference. You should also read value of /sys/fs/cgroup/ level where
we still have kernel threads if i have understand your comments
> My guess is that reflects the kernel booted with the two cpus before we
> created the cgroup. I am investigation the 'isolcpus' kernel parameter.
>> I think it is a good starting point to do some consumption measurements.
>> Mike, Vincent, what do you think ? Do you need more informations or
> anything else ?
>
Yes it's a good starting point. One key point will be to be sure to
not use cpu1. In fact, we mainly have 2 power efficient states: use
equally the 2 cpus or use only one cpu and put the other one in a low
power state.
Vincent
> Thanks
> -- Daniel
>> - --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOU6AVAAoJEAKBbMCpUGYAbQoH/0NeKLecIuMT57B/w1Jid/bn
> yzqD3zwMt0EfUwfsU6H5dAYgumMzKmWWXR9+7FvYhkcckXfzumiMLFKhIybrUSz/
> LW7ymHwxXcHWqBTKwMCasHzo9WhlRTlLA1pGAqo0qtG1IBpalE68ZRwItdY/HSOw
> 0mDGoegq4DHQtcF64XwGRZJo2wAsamtlWGejFdqLQU4FONyYI42rLXMNAG6VD3vG
> CJrIudH5hLz3ZBdHYeRB6kWaj1O4skAW6fgySASiqFWoEaZzvT/7UuVBEYawpuyT
> Pm+U9OHAfHUWfnyDASFfx6ZQKRS5Uk40XzThjGgwoo598EN8FXZD3N6UZ1WmL2U=
> =H00Z
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>