So goes the song sung by people of innumerable destroyed civilizations of the past.

Rattlesnakes are dangerous to be around. However, I do not consider them to be my "enemy". However, I do recognize the need to live apart from them. You need to wake up to the fact that genetics ultimately determines the destiny of culture. Even if a given non-White is "OK", what of their decedents?

I respectfully disagree with you sir. I rather have a family-oriented China man living next door than a drunk, degenerate, or homo neighbor that will harass my kids and family. Yes, most nonwhites that come here disproportionately commit crime (especially blacks and Mexicans and for those I make no exceptions). But let's call a spade a spade and there are many undesirable whites out there who bring down our communities and commit crime against our own. Again, I'll take a conservative, Christian non white as a friend than a liberal white who corrupts our way of life.

The reason why so many of the nonwhites here are so horrible is because we have an immigration policy where everything and everyone is allowed in. Of course it is always the worst that you're gonna get under those circumstances. If the quotas were tightened and standards raised, only the truly worthy would make it here. I'd have no issue with those. My own Irish relatives suffered incredible discrimination many generations ago. So did the Italians, the Greeks and any other White perceived as being less than the Nordic protestant "gold standard."

We are facing the destruction of our culture and civilization. To win the war, we have to first purge the corrupt, evil government that enacts policies contrary to our value system. Then, all we have to do is enforce the law. By enforcing existing laws we'd rid the country (either through deportation or jail sentences) of the majority of the undesirable element.

If not, tell me how come so many Chinamen were here during the construction of the Brooklyn bridge and the Gold Rush in San Francisco and it was never an issue? How come the Southwest wasn't the cesspool it now is even though we never depoted the Mestizos living there after we won the territories? How come we never deported to Siberia the Eskimos in Alaska and they have no posed any danger to our existence? How come we've been able to function with the few native reservations sprawled over the midwest and the occasional Native American working in our cities? That's why I don't buy this whole notion to deport every person who has a drop of nonwhite in their veins.

People, the reason why non whites are ruining our countries is because of the new 1965 policy. While I personally strongly dislike the bad nonwhite aliens, I see clearly that the downfall of this country is not due to the fact that someone is nonwhite as much as the Zog policies hell bent in destroying us and, yes, using hordes of nonwhites to undermine us.

This is obviously dumb dumb city. Jew tool as in a tool of the Jews, not a Jew who happens to be a tool. Goodness!

Look, the question is not whether I spent "time" deciphering the insult. All that matters is that the intent was to insult a man I happen to respect. I'm tired of seeing the liberal media demonize one of the few white, middle-aged man who has the balls to stand for what he believes in and is not afraid to be a Christian conservative in a society that ridicules that.

So, what if he's not perfect? Who is? If he was really pandering to the Jews, he'd be promoting same sex marriage, negro gang-banging culture, feminism, Islamization, and liberalism. He ain't all right. So, stop bashing of this man who may be the last white, christian conservative commentator.

So many problems with this post. If you want to reach out to people don't start off with an insult, that negates everything else you say. No one claimed Bill is a Jew, except you, and no he's not a true American.

Bill O'Reilly is a true American and I find it extremely insulting that you claim otherwise. I took issue with this Fade Lady or whatever calling him names and acting like a know-it-all. Why must every white, male, Christian conservative American be subject to name calling and ridicule? Why do you find that acceptable? What has Billy O'Reilly done to destroy this country? As far as I know, he is one of the few people willing to put himself out there and represent conservative males like me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by joejoeson

You're trying to come off as "anti-racist" but guess what Liberals will still call you racist because of this quote. They will ignore that you don't hate all nonwhites, simply by lumping homos and criminals together makes you an evil white supremacist whether you are or not. There is no middle ground, either join us (if you're really white) or face the wrath of the "anti-racists" (they hate you by the way even if you claim you like legal nonwhites).

Do you really think someone like me gives a rat's ass about what the liberals think of me? Well, Mr. O'Reilly doesn't either, which is why he keeps doing what he's doing even when the liberal media calls him a redneck, ignorant, and ridicule his Christian beliefs as outdated and out of tune with the present degenerate society we live in.

I didn't say he was a Jew; I said he was their tool. I don't really see how that's any better, though.

Quote:

I don't care what race you are

Gee, what a superior person it makes you that you don't have any objection to our nation being overrun and our race replaced.

Quote:

The non whites that came here legally, have assimilated into our society

You are utterly and completely full of crap. They haven't assimilated even slightly. They use race-based advantages constantly. They destroy our culture and replace it with their own. Are you going to tell me that China Town has "assimilated," you moron? Are you going to tell me the JEWS have "assimilated"? How freaking blind can you be?

I'm happy you're comfortable with non-Whites. When we have taken our nations back, you can go live with them, along with all of your liberal comrades.

__________________

__________________

Maybe Trump is beginning to figure out that when the media are happy with him, that's a sure sign he has massively screwed up, and when they are spitting fire, he is on course.

Look, the question is not whether I spent "time" deciphering the insult. All that matters is that the intent was to insult a man I happen to respect. I'm tired of seeing the liberal media demonize one of the few white, middle-aged man who has the balls to stand for what he believes in and is not afraid to be a Christian conservative in a society that ridicules that.

So, what if he's not perfect? Who is? If he was really pandering to the Jews, he'd be promoting same sex marriage, negro gang-banging culture, feminism, Islamization, and liberalism. He ain't all right. So, stop bashing of this man who may be the last white, christian conservative commentator.

He supports Zionism, while being against a white state. He supports the wars for Israel we have been having. He supports race mixing.

o'reilly is correct. duke believes all jews are out to destroy western society. while there may be jews like soros and blankfein who are subversive and evil, to place the average jewish person who works for a living and has the same struggles as anyone else in the same league as those two is vile.
duke doesn't differentiate. he despises all jews and seems to have a soft spot for muslims.
he is a hatemonger and a liar.

Since when is simply not wanting to live with these people "despising" them. Maybe it's the fact Jews HAVE to have a host nation or race to live off of, hence parasite.

o'reilly is correct. duke believes all jews are out to destroy western society. while there may be jews like soros and blankfein who are subversive and evil, to place the average jewish person who works for a living and has the same struggles as anyone else in the same league as those two is vile.
duke doesn't differentiate. he despises all jews and seems to have a soft spot for muslims.
he is a hatemonger and a liar.

Wrong bozo, Dr. Duke regularly singles out "supremacist" jews.

Problem is YOU aren't listening and just take your cues from SUPREMACIST JEWS

Look dumbass, Bill ain't a Jew and you better stop pretending you know everything when you know nothing. Bill's as Irish and white as it comes, he's a true American who defends the values and traditions this nation had before it got hijacked by the liberal sponsored Jews. He's actually the only decent thing on tv.

Yeah, and Bill insists the Romans killed Christ

I guess that typifies his depth of thought--or the fact that he's a tool of jews and wouldn't dare cross his masters.

I rather have a family-oriented China man living next door than a drunk, degenerate, or homo neighbor that will harass my kids and family. Yes, most nonwhites that come here disproportionately commit crime (especially blacks and Mexicans and for those I make no exceptions). But let's call a spade a spade and there are many undesirable whites out there who bring down our communities and commit crime against our own. Again, I'll take a conservative, Christian non white as a friend than a liberal white who corrupts our way of life.

The Chinese are almost universally very family oriented. Germany has many Liberal White atheists who drink. Now, which country would you rather live in?

We are not talking about individuals. We are talking about the overall national character of people *and* that of their future offspring. What if the drunk White is more likely to produce White grandchildren that are acceptable to you, while the grandchildren of the "conservative" Chinese enter the voting booth wholesale in an attempt to bring the next Mao Zedong to power? (This is an example of regression toward the mean.)

Choose carefully now, because *your* descendants will have to live, and will eventually intermarry, with the descendants of the immigrants.

The relationship between race and national character is more complex than you realize. Once you get through with all your criteria for approved non-White immigrants, you would be unwittingly implementing a eugenic process (albeit in this case only with regard to immigration) that attempts to select non-Whites based on what are essentially White character traits.

It is far, far more viable to obtain the internal traits you desire with eugenics (e.g., paying idiots and people of poor character to have few/no children) within the White gene pool than to totally reengineer non-Whites to the same standards. Why the heck would we want to recreate non-Whites into our ideal internal image?

Quote:

HYPOTHETICALLY, IN WHICH NATION WOULD YOU PREFER TO LIVE?
In which society would you prefer to live: a libertarian society with the racial composition of Brazil, Haiti, Nigeria, or Pakistan or a social democratic United Kingdom, France, Germany, Norway, Denmark, Australia, or Canada with a predominantly European population.

The same goes for pro-immigration Christians, especially conservative traditionalists: Would you rather live in a post-Christian but 95% White Denmark or Norway or Canada in which most people are atheists or a Christian Mexico or Nigeria or South Africa?

Similarly, I'd like to ask this question of those who insist that their opposition to massive non-White immigration has nothing to do with race and everything to do overpopulation and its baneful effects. In which society would you prefer to live: a hypothetical America of 100-200 million that was 70-80% Black and mestizo and pure Amerindian and 10-20% White; or a hypothetical America of 400-500 million people that was 100% European or 90% European and 10% North Asian?

If those asked would prefer to live in White nations and societies that don't adhere to their ideological, religious, philosophical, and environmentalist ideals, then they obviously believe that race in general is more important than population density, ideology, religion, economics, and the environment.

Unless they were rich and perhaps not even then (e.g. affluent Whites in South Africa), any minimally sane White person would prefer to live in a social democratic welfare state and that was 90-100% White than in a libertarian country ruled by Blacks and/or mestizos-Amerindians. Virtually all Whites would enjoy a superior quality of life and a higher standard of living even in White countries anathema to libertarians and economic conservatives. Most crucially, despite the evils of welfare and socialism, they would be far less likely to be victims of crime.

SECESSION TO CREATE A BASTION OF WHITENESS?
The destruction of White America is inevitable given the suicidal immigration policies of which Libertarians are dogmatic advocates. The only hope for Whites is a separate nation, conceivably in the Pacific Northwest. Perhaps another and smaller White country could be founded in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine.

I doubt that this will happen. And, practically, I don't know how it could or would be actualized. And I doubt that I'll be alive to take part and move there. But let's assume, for the sake of argument, that such a nation is created.

If so, will millions of libertarians and other free marketeers, globalists and "turbo-capitalists" migrate to this last bastion of Whiteness in North America to escape the non-White-majority dystopia that they and their fellow immigration enthusiasts created? And so, too, with neoconservatives, liberals, even leftists. And once ensconced in this haven of White survival and Western Civilization, will they revert to form and begin to call for open borders? If so, the founders should make them sign an oath that they won't do to this nation what they did to what was once called the United States. And if they violate this agreement, they should be expelled to the anti-White Hell they created. Only then will Whites have a livable society.