Discovering music on your own requires that you listen to a song for a period of time to see if you like it. Sure, if one of your friends tells you about a track you may “discover” it through them, but you will also spend some time listening to the song before you decide if it’s for you. This is the nature of the beast. Music is a time-based phenomenon.

Unlike with videos where you can “time compress” a video into a single frame image that you can easily visually scan, with music there is no alternative format that represents the song that can be easily scanned, except for the song name. This explains why most music interfaces display playlists, with song names as text not unlike in a spreadsheet, or list of song names. These can be easily scanned, but have no direct correlation to the sound or feeling of the song itself. I have always found it odd that in this era of digital music and highly designed interfaces, that most players default to a spreadsheet of song names to present music – true of iTunes, Amazon, Spotify, Rdio and many others. Spreadsheet music players.

Sure you can have a thumbnail of the album cover, but rarely do you see this on a song-by-song basis. Maybe in parts of Beatport or other DJ sites that are focused on tracks, but not generally on the web for the mass consumers of songs. And yes we have also seen many different visual interfaces like Sonorflow that let you visually traverse music genres or the linkage between bands, but these do not convey information about the songs themselves or the emotions that they convey.

What if we had a way to make a song come alive visually? This was the whole idea behind the original MTV and it was wildly successful for decades. What is the online equivalent, or even better, what can we do to push the whole boundary of music discovery and showcasing to new levels by embracing the time-based nature of music and coupling it with visual expression and a modern interface that lets you experience and interact with music in new and interesting ways. And no, I’m not talking about the waveform displays on Soundcloud.

I am working with a new company called Viinyl which is in the final testing stage for a whole new video-based version of their Music Showcasing platform that is very hot. I haven’t seen anything like Viinyl 2.0 and I think it represents a whole new way of presenting music. Viinyl amplifies the emotional content of songs visually, in a way that is enjoyable and super easy to use. This is a whole new way of showcasing music.

Viinyl is re-defining the way music and videos are experienced. In fact their video player is a new way to attract attention, engage an audience with the emotion of a song, and make money on singles and tracks. From a simple URL you can run a full screen video with interactive overlays and gather email, sell tracks and tickets, connect to your social networks and literally showcase music thru video. You can sell any digital file including music and movies, and provide relavent information directly in the context of the song including bios, links, credits, contacts, concert dates, lyrics, etc.

The new platform supports audio file sales with fixed or flexible album pricing (minimum price and Pay What You Want) along with various free distribution options. The software is lightning fast, with just a few clicks, musicians and labels will be able to share their work independently – and hold onto all revenue generated.

The new Viinyl 2.0 LP format delivers a visual playlist, giving listeners and fans a far richer, more immersive and inviting music experience compared with the current spreadsheet format. This new software will be available in the coming weeks.

Music is a much smaller and less significant part of many people’s lives than 10-20 years ago. There is more competition for our attention and the value of music has declined precipitously. This graphic shows the rise of digital against physical music, and the overall impact of piracy, widespread distribution and digital media on the music industry. The sad story is that overall the music business is shrinking. That is a fact that we all have to face. The silver lining in all of this may be on the horizon, but it cannot come soon enough for me. We have to do something to reverse the trend.

Why are artist, writer, producer, engineer and other credits almost always missing from iTunes, Pandora, Spotify, Amazon, Rdio, and almost every other music service, with little exception? That’s the basis for a metadata movement being spearheaded by producer, mixer and engineer Count (aka Mikael Eldridge), whose ‘credits’ include artists like DJ Shadow, Radiohead, The Rolling Stones, Frank Sinatra, New Order, No Doubt, Galactic, Zoe Keating, and Tycho.

“If Led Zeppelin had only sold albums digitally when they started, it’s very unlikely that many people would know who Jimmy Page or Robert Plant are because the digital music files you purchase for download or streaming can’t show you who played on them.”

Over the last few years we’ve seen an explosion in interactive music services. iTunes, Pandora, Spotify, Soundcloud, and dozens of other platforms are touted as groundbreaking services, but if you really think about it, it’s all on the backs of the people who actually created the music; the performers, producers, and engineers. These services are nothing without music creators and at the very least they need to finally give music creators credit on screen.

There is no excuse. Its the right thing to do, it would create a much richer user experience, and it would improve these music services by turning people on to new music. That’s why myself and a crew of dedicated folks at the Grammys are tackling this issue once and for all. But we need your help to show there is real demand.

“It’s absolutely unbelievable that I can go online and instantly have access to Roger Federer’s obscure tennis stats but I can’t even see who is singing a song on iTunes or Pandora.”

There are many obvious reasons why credit must be given to music creators including:

“In a digital world there’s no up-front cost to have infinite inventory that replicates itself on demand as a perfect digital copy and it only does that after it’s been authorized to do so, which is usually with a purchase. It has really been a shift from having infrastructure and access to distribution to just having access to distribution.” -Jeff Price

“As anyone who buys music knows, the way we are finding it and buying it has changed radically over the last 15 years.

For musicians, it used to be that if you wanted someone to release your music, you’d have to get the attention and approval of an artist and repertoire (or A&R person) at a label, work to sign a deal either big or small so that the label would then press up your product and work with distributors to get your vinyl or 8-track or cassette or CD to ship them out to record stores where the music fan could have access to them.

Now, all you have to do it is get some audio files online and instantly be able to have your music available to the current online global audience of 1.5 billion people, which is still just about 23% of the world’s population, so the potential for reaching new audiences continues to grow. As mobile devices get smarter, it’s inevitable that consumers will be downloading more music and playing it without a desktop or laptop computer even being involved, too.

As a result of the rise of digital download stores such as iTunes and Amazon mp3, the need has come for new companies to aggregate songs and distribute them out to all these growing online stores.

That’s where TuneCore comes in.

After SpinArt, Price went on to work with eMusic.com, first as a consultant, then as interim VP of Content Acquisition, and finally as the Senior Director of Music/Business Development. He contributed towards the creation of eMusic’s initial business model and created and implemented the first subscription-based music sales and distribution structure.

In 2005 Price started TuneCore, which is an aggregator which helps get digital music into online stores such as iTunes, Amazon mp3, eMusic, Rhapsody, Napster, Amie Street, Groupie Tunes, ShockHound.com, and lala.

TuneCore has also been in the news in recent months as some very mainstream acts have used the service to get their music direct to consumers, including Nine Inch Nails and Paul Westerberg. Just a few weeks back, it was announced that Aretha Franklin would be using TuneCore to distribute her version of My Country Tis Thee that she performed at the Obama inauguration.

TuneCore’s competitors are services such as IODA, The Orchard, and CD Baby and I discuss with Price about what makes TuneCore different from these services.

This episode includes music from a variety of independent music that has been submitted to be for Well-Rounded Radio.

The royalties that songwriters receive from CD sales and digital downloads will remain the same, the same for both media and the same as the current rate: 9.1 cents per song. The rate for ringtones will increase to 24 cents a song, above even the 15 cents songwriters and publishers lobbied for.

However there is still great unease with the direction that things are headed on the part of online webcasting and streaming music services as they look into the reality of making payments at these levels. Pandora, NPR and others seeking a new structure want rates to be set as a percentage of total revenue, similar to how royalties are assessed for satellite radio or subscription music services. At the very least, they want a system that will favor webcasters big and small.

Webcasters are required to pay an escalating fee to copyright owners every time they play a song for a listener. This year, for instance, Web radio stations are supposed to pay 14 hundredths of a penny ($.0014) per song streamed, per listener; site operators figure that will cost them about 2.1 cents per user, per hour. That is a figure that most webcasters simply cannot afford to pay, since most sites are advertising supported and do not generate enough revenue to pay the license fees and operate their businesses. Read more from All things Digital here.

We will see what happens in the next month or so as things come to a head.

MySpace had everything it needed to establish a truly revolutionary music model. Loads of indie artists and millions of fans all interacting online on the MySpace platform and the opportunity to connect them and enable commerce. Bands could post their tracks and sell them directly to their fans, all that was really missing was a better way to promote the music. This was the hard work that MySpace failed to do.

As the LA Times reported yesterday, MySpace Music relaunches, tries to turn up revenue volume with loads of major label content and a partnership with Amazon.

“Although MySpace was a pioneer in giving unsigned musicians a voice, the social network struggled to leverage that momentum into a revenue-generating business. (Well actually it didn’t really try that hard. A failed experiment with the defunct SnoCap was about it, because they sure didn’t share any banner advertising revenue with anyone).

Details of the new MySpace Music are now as familiar as the lyrics to any hit pop tune. MySpace’s 120 million worldwide users will be able to create and share playlists, as well as listen to songs or albums in its digital catalog for free. If users want to put the tracks on a portable music player, they need to buy them through Amazon.com.

However, this revamped MySpace Music falls short of the comprehensive one-stop online music store DeWolfe described last spring when he announced the service. At that time, he promised that music aficionados could not only listen to and purchase songs but also buy concert tickets or a band’s T-shirt.

Instead, MySpace went for the basics. Users will be able to search for music by artist, song title or album, then place it on a playlist that can hold as many as 100 tracks. The songs can also be added to a shortened playlist on a MySpace profile page, where others can hear it. Other features will be added over time.

The playlist is hardly an innovation. Other online services, such as the start-up Imeem and Last.fm, which is owned by CBS, offer free streaming and ways for friends to share their virtual mix tapes. These smaller rivals say they’re not worried about the competitive threat from MySpace, noting that they had a head start.

“Retrofitting an older legacy online service is like trying to turn the cargo ship toward the more nimble speedboat,” said Steve Jang, chief marketing officer at Imeem.

“There are 120 million unique users every month on MySpace,” DeWolfe said. “It’s the largest music community in the world.” (Well it is debatable whether slapping major label content on MySpace makes it the ‘largest music community in the world’ – but we will see.)

Most of the revenue for MySpace Music, at least early on, will come from advertising. Music industry executives hope that a global audience will lure advertisers eager to reach a youthful, music-loving demographic. (Oh great – McDonalds here we come).

The music industry could use fresh sources of revenue to supplement traditional CD sales, which have fallen precipitously since 2000. CD shipments in the U.S. are down 46% (that’s right) over the last seven years, and digital sales haven’t come close to making up that shortfall, according to the Recording Industry Assn. of America’s statistics.

All four major music labels — Sony BMG, Universal Music, Warner Music and EMI — together own a 40% stake in MySpace Music, so they stand to gain financially if the venture attracts enough advertising. Moreover, the labels hope that by creating a social environment where people can discover music, they’ll be more likely to buy it.

But by aligning itself with the corporate music establishment, MySpace risks losing its “indie” feel, said Dave Kusek, vice president of Berkleemusic.com, the online extension school for the Berklee College of Music in Boston. “It’s a complete 180 on their part, in terms of where they came from and what made them so cool, and really what attracted their initial audience,” Kusek said.”

Here is an excerpt from an email sent by the indie conglomerate “The Orchard” to their members yesterday, explaining why – once again – the indie artist is excluded from this big media play. Some things never change. Seems to me like the Orchard “got sprayed”.

“The major labels received equity in MySpace Music. Despite our best and ongoing efforts, MySpace Music executives have indicated that independents as a sector will not receive equity. If equity is ever given to independents, The Orchard has assurances that our clients will be included. We will continue to press the issue with MySpace management on behalf of all independents, not just our clients, as we disagree with the decision of MySpace and do not feel it is an enlightened perspective towards the independent sector. And, to the extent we find future success, we reiterate a point we made before, which is: if we ever secure equity for you, it will all go to you;

While we don’t agree with MySpace’s position, we do believe there is bigger opportunity at play and that “equity” can be a red herring when compared to getting fair rates as far as percent of ad sales (which is where we see the real value of this service in the long run). We have secured aggressive commercial terms on your behalf, and we think this is most important;

The revenue potential from MySpace Music, and from this new type of ad-supported business, will take place over the long term. Money won’t start flowing overnight. And, the potential of this service rests in the hands of you: the artists and labels. Like the so-called “Long Tail”, it won’t magically occur, but instead, is simply a possibility. The more you and/or your artists engage with MySpace Music, and get your fans to engage, the more money you’ll make;

We do not believe the service will be cannibalistic to the a la carte download market but see it as an entirely new and complementary form of value creation. In the long term (meaning, more like 5 years, and not 5 months!), we believe it will evolve into a larger industry segment than exists currently in the format-based world.”

—-

Ok, so here’s the bottom line. MySpace takes a vibrant community of musicians (5 million) and fans (120 million) and sells the whole thing out to the major labels for a 40% cut. No equity available for indie labels or artists. Any be sure of this – the equity owned by the major labels will not find its way to any of their artists. Big media wins again.

Rather than trying to encourage the direct-to-fan model that they once touted as they encouraged indie artists to post their music and develop their friends – MySpace hands it all over to the combine. THIS IS NOT THE FUTURE OF MUSIC.

The state of the music business is obviously in transition, but new models are beginning to work at various levels that shine a very positive light on the future of the music industry. For example, some of the predictions made in the Future of Music Book and in other places are beginning to come to pass, such as the abandonment of DRM, music subscription and licensing services, ad supported music and the ascent of the Indie artist and Indie label. Take a look at these examples:

You can now purchase MP3 files for download without DRM from all four major labels on Amazon.com, emusic and a growing list of music destinations. The predictions that an unprotected format would kill sales have simply not been true. These businesses are exploding.

Early proponents of the subscription models Napster and Rhapsody have survived and are growing.

There is active discussion of a flat-fee structure for music at major labels where once we were laughed out of the offices.

Indie Labels now account for upwards of 30% of total music sales, up from the low 20’s just a few years ago. This is a profound shift in the powerbase that favors the independent artist and innovator.

Social music sites such as LastFM, Pandora, iLike and many more are making the fans into tastemakers with the ability to promote and share great new music at the touch of a button.

This is all very good news for musicians, writers and artists who want control of their destiny and their careers.