The defendant is charged [in count __]
with abandoning a child under the age of six years. The statute defining this
offense imposes punishment on any person having the charge of any child under
the age of six years who exposes such child in any place, with intent wholly to
abandon such child.

For you to find the defendant guilty
of this charge, the state must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable
doubt:

Element 1 - Charge of childThe first element is that the
defendant had charge of a child. To "have charge" means to have care, custody,
or supervision of the child, to have an obligation or responsibility to the
child, or to have been a person entrusted with the child's care or management.

Element 2 - Child under 6 years
of ageThe second element is that child was
under the age of six years. This means that the child had not yet had (his/her)
sixth birthday.

Element 3 - AbandonmentThe third element is that the
defendant exposed the child with the intent of wholly abandoning the child. To
"expose" in this context means to take away food, shelter and protection. To
"abandon" means to withdraw one's support or help from another in spite of a
duty, allegiance, or responsibility. "Wholly" means completely. A person acts
"intentionally"
with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such
result. <See
Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant had charge of a child, 2) the
child was under six years of age, and 3) the defendant exposed the child with
the intent of wholly abandoning the child.

If you unanimously find that the state
has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of the crime of
abandoning a child under six years of age, then you shall find the defendant
guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to
prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the
defendant not guilty.

Commentary

Subsection (b) of the statute
provides the following exception to culpability: "The act of a parent or lawful
agent of a parent leaving an infant thirty days or younger with a designated
employee pursuant to Section 17a-58 shall not constitute a violation of this
section." A "designated employee" as set out in Section 17a-58 and defined in
Section 17a-57 means emergency room nursing staff designated to take physical
custody of an infant voluntarily surrendered by a parent or agent. "Where
exceptions to a prohibition in a criminal statute are situated separately from
the enacting clause, the exceptions are to be proven by the defense." (Internal
quotation marks omitted.) State v. Valinski, 254 Conn. 107, 123 (2000)
(rule also applies when the exception is found in a separate statute).