Rachel Maddow: Poll Reveals Trump Voters Are in Alternate State of Reality

Ok reldra. So the election was essentially split down the middle (with Clinton having a few percentage points higher in the popular vote). This
means half the nation voted Trump so half the nation is raving lunatics? Seriously?

In a way you are doing what Hillary did. Rather than go after whatever issues you have with Trump policies.... you are attacking your fellow citizens
(many of which may be your friends in real life or on the interwebz).

That is not exactly what this says. I think I got responses faster than the video takes to play or the article takes to be read.

I did not
watch the video. I did read your post though.

This isn't the first time though that you have made blanket statements about essentially everyone that didn't vote the way you did.

I am not making the statement. I gave a summary of the poll. I assumed people would jump before even looking at a short video or a short
article.

originally posted by: Christosterone
I live in the reality where Trump won the election...with a total of 306 electoral college votes..

This is true.

In my reality the affordable care act will be gone in a few months, taxes will decrease for my wife and I (who are both corps from 35% to %15),
a wall will be built to block the hoardes of uneducated aliens from flooding into my great country, and we will begin opening refineries to deal with
the oil from America's MASSIVE oil fields heretonow off limits from a soon to be dismantled EPA...

Trump has already walked a bunch of these "promises" back. Also congressional Republicans are expressing doubts at repealing the Affordable Care Act
too. Apparently now that it can be a reality and not just a political football, they aren't as eager to up-end the professional health insurance
market/health industry.

What did I miss? Oh yeah, Obama and his leftist policies will be completed obliterated from the history books and he will be reduced to a
parentheses in American history...

This is just desperate hope. Not to mention very sad. Destroying history or an important person's significance to it is the stuff of authoritarians...
This opinion really shows you in a sad political state.

Betcha my reality is more realistic than Maddows...I'd actually bet but I don't gamble...

Good luck with this thread. Though I see you used a few Trump supporter triggers (MSNBC source, Rachel Maddow, it's a poll, telling them their news is
fake, etc) so I hope you brought your flame proof suit as there will be quite a few who will just see these things I listed and immediately get
triggered about the whole thread.

You are confused...

Soft minded leftists are the ones who get triggered and require safe spaces with coloring books and therapy dogs…

Conservatives live in the real world where winners and losers exist…

In the case of the most recent election we are the winners and you are the losers…

-Chris

Thanks for proving my point.

PS: You have the wrong person. I'm not going to get suckered into some petty. "Nuh huh I know you are but what am I?"

originally posted by: draoicht
The reality that matters is that their votes won Trump the election.

It serves no good purpose to question the accuracy of their world view.

More divisive sneering at the winner and his electorate is unhelpful.

It does serve a good purpose. If half of the people are walking around thinking the stock market fell under Obama and that California shouldn't be
included in the popular vote, it is kind of important.

This poll is mainly about Obama. The only part about Clinton has to do with the popular vote, a fact, though OBVIOUSLY not what decides an election.

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY
Dead people always vote for democrats and they vote often! Just thought I would leave that here. Don't believe me? Ask your local state representative
and if he won't tell you...There is your answer.

No. They do not vote often. They were found to be on registered voter rolls, but not found to have voted.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.