No, that Obama. Clinton is just plain greedy and without conscience. Its become quite clear that anyone with enough money can exert control over her. Just what we need in a US President. Heaven help us if she wins.

So, that basically means that any American who goes overseas, hooks up or marries someone from another country and gives birth to a child in a third country, that child is eligible to become President. If I understand correctly, Cruz did not even become a citizen of the US until 2011.

I think it’s time to bury the whole concept of natural born because, in effect, it no longer exists.

I’m sorry, but all this does is prove how hypocritical he is - he can afford to do all that. What about the seniors sitting in the cold because they can’t afford to turn the heater on?

Cheap power is the basis of all comfort, not to mention industry. What does Chuck lose by being so environmentally conscientious? Absolutely nothing! It’s others who suffer when power costs are pushed up through subsidies for uneconomic “renewables”. If anything, Charles profits from it as a major landlord.

I don’t have to be given a caricature. It’s plain from his own mouth that he’s a complete captive of the global warming scam and a total hypocrite - living the high life while advocating abstinence for everyone else.

There’s another very serious reason for interference - the global warming summit in November where they will try to pass a binding treating which basically abrogates national sovereignty to “save the planet”. Harper will not sign and every effort will be made to get rid of him at the election, which will be held prior to the conference.

Lord Monckton has warned that one of the reasons for the vicious and unremitting attacks on Prime Minister Tony Abbott in Australia is that he would never sign such a treaty and will not have to face an election until next year. There was a concerted attempt just last month to replace him with Malcolm Turnbull, a Goldman Sachs warmist who would sign in a flash.

Josh is wonderful at pocking the green blob in the eye but just imagine being on the receiving end of a concerted, government endorsed smear campaign. And it can't even be dismissed as just a conspiracy theory because they're quite open about it. See the earlier item -

Except if CO2 were zero per cent we would not be here to see it because there would be no life on earth.

This is the worst aspect, which is often overlooked in the heat of debate, they are literally demonising the staff of life, a trace gas which is plant food and regulates our own breathing. If there were none we would not even have to wait to starve to death, we would die because our respiratory system would not work.

I didn’t include an exert of the Real Science article. This is the introduction

“The level of Soviet style criminal activity at the White House has reached spectacular new lows. On February 20, The White House sent out this E-mail announcing that they were going to start attacking individual scientists who dissented from the White House global warming agenda.”

It then shows the actual emails referred to and the al most instantaneous attack on Dr. Willie Soon is the proof of the pudding.

I was just thinking something similar, not about an epiphany because there’s no hope of that, but simply how much evil one man can do. As you say, it would be hard to think of anyone in the world who has done more damage in the last half century and there’re plenty of villains to pick from.

He’s a narcissistic, egomaniacal, bad tempered control freak who originally started us on the road to ruin which Gillard is so assiduously following.

The only bright note is that an election is due in September but Gillard is doing her best to cram every last bit destructive legislation through before parliament rises at the end of this week.

I’m in two minds about this challenge. I can’t stand the sight of Gillard but am concerned that Rudd is enough of a conman to once again inveigle some people to vote for him. He won’t win, thank goodness, but I want them to be well and truly thrashed.

NKP_Vet, it is THE Rupert Murdock. This has been looked into before and he does regularly tweet under his own name. It is also exactly the sort of thing he’d say. He doesn’t seem to have any shyness about airing his personal views.

I don’t wish harm to anyone. I’d much rather give her the figurative boot.

I should mention, though, that she’s a vicious guttersnipe who doesn’t draw the line at anything and doesn’t know the meaning of words like fairness and ethics. The level of our political debate at the moment is not the gutter but the sewer.

He actually wrote it about 19 years earlier for his World War One show Yip! Yip! Yaphank but didn’t use it then and only released it when Kate Smith asked for a song for Remembrance Day in, I think, 1938.

She’s a power mad idiot. Unfortunately, there’s two years to go to the next election and untold damage that can be done in that time, especially since the rapid Greens will have the balance of power in the Senate from next month and will be driving the agenda.

Australians are desperate to get rid of her and her government and the longer it takes the more extreme the result will be.

I live in Australia but still agree strongly with every point she makes. Apart from the artificially high cost of fuel, ethanol mandates and subsidies result in higher food prices, less food and thus starvation.

As for borrowing to give to an unknown quantity, well that’s just as ridiculous as it sounds.

Unfortunately, the only thing that will get us out of this mess is a new election. The Greens get the balance of power in the Senate in July and they’re even worse than the government - if that possible.

Here is the actual quote from a paper by Gillard I referred to above -

“For the Left to make any real advance all these perspectives on the relationship to Labor in government need to be rejected in favour of a concept of strategic support for Labor governments. We need to recognise the only possibility for major social change is under a long period of Labor administration. Within that administration the Left needs to be willing to participate to shape political outcomes, recognising the need to except (sic) often unpalatable compromises in the short term to bolster the prospect of future advance. The task of pushing back the current political constraints by changing public opinion would need to be tackled by the Left through government, social movements and trade unions.”

What you have to bear in mind in repeating anything she says is that she’s pathological liar. I am not exaggerating. She is also a Fabian and wrote years ago that sometimes you have to accept unpleasant compromises to eventually prevail with your agenda.

The reason for 180 deg. turnaround is simple. She has announced a carbon tax which the voters are revolving against and is seen as being unduly under the influence of the Green. Ergo, she is suddenly a social conservative (about as much as Rudd was an economic conservative) to differentiate herself from the Green and try to hold onto the more conservative parts of the Labor vote, which is deservedly collapsing.

What about Coke itself? In Australia its made with cane sugar (I stopped drinking it in America when “Classic” Coke changed its sweetener to corn syrup - simply because I didn’t like the taste - but it was never changed at all in Australia). The contents on the bottle are shown simply as: Carbonated water, cane sugar, caramel (150d) and food acid (338) and caffeine.

In that case, he IS a natural born citizen and has nothing to hide. Whatever his faults, he’s not responsible for his conception!

The only way his BC could cause him problems (and be worth spending millions to hide) is if it clearly and plainly reveals that he’s not eligible to be President. Therefore, that is what I believe to be the case. Nothing else makes sense.

Not to forget, also, all the earlier references by various people (including Obama himself when he tacitly admitted it when he said that he was running to Senator, not President) to the fact that he was not American born.

I live in Australia, and I can almost guarantee that our Climate Change Minister (have you ever hard of anything so ridiculous?) will sign us up to whatever is put in front of him. Not just the U.S. will suffer the consequences.

It looks like Cancun is not quite the harmless joke its made out to be. This time, they are deliberately playing it down and trying to get things through by stealth or, as Lord Monckton so brilliantly puts it, "transparent impenetrability".

It does affect national security because it dampens a free and candid exchange of views. Nothing which has been relesed is really surprising or even unexpected in the course of normal diplomatic affairs but how many diplomats, knowing what could happen, would be prepared to give their unvarnished views of local affairs overseas in future?

The whole world is slowing awakening from the nightmare and in Australia our lunatic Prime Minister is absolutely bound and determined to impose a carbon price on our economy. Its enough to make you tear your hair. And this is after clearly stating before the election that she would not do this. No wonder people are calling her Juliar (Julia Gillard)

Andrew Bolt is one of the very, very few journalists in Australia prepared to tell it how it is. Most of them are so much on the bandwagon that they simply refuse to report anything negative about AGW. I truly believe that people in this country, unless they follow the issue on the internet, have no idea about the reality of this montrous fraud.

I understand (from all the discussion about Obama’s eligibility) that, for presidential eligibility, its not enough to be born in the U.S.A., your parents must be U.S. citizens at the time. Which, of course, immediately eliminates Obama!