The
population-paranoid eugenics movement is on a roll. On July 29, 2011
the Department
of Global Health and Population at the Harvard School of Public
Health sounded the population alarm bell in the international science
journal, Science, advocating for international contraception efforts
to be funded by wealthy countries. On August 1, 2011 the Obama administration
announced
its plan to force health insurers, beginning in 2013, to pay for
“free” birth control for all U.S. women, including free
birth control pills, morning after pills, sterilization, and any other
“FDA-approved contraception methods and contraceptive counseling.”
Americans should understand that Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Commissioner Margaret Hamburg is well-versed in eugenics theory, as
both of her elite psychiatrist parents have headed the American
Eugenics Society. We are rapidly moving toward the time when government
bureaucrats issue regulations to determine which fetuses, at five weeks
of age, are genetically fit enough to be born.

A
Brief History of Eugenics

The
goal of eugenics is to utilize science to improve the genetic composition
of a population. The elite eugenics ruling class is terrified of rapid
population growth in “undesirable genetic stock.” Their
efforts are focused on controlling rapid population growth in developing
countries, such as African nations, and in minority groups in the United
States and other developed countries.

The
“scientific” theory of eugenics originated in the 19th century
with the works of Charles Darwin and others. Its theory was adopted
as a core principle of genetic research by The Rockefeller University,
Carnegie Institution for Science, and others at the beginning of the
20th century. It was openly promoted and discussed for the first four
decades of the 20th century. It even gained a supportive Supreme
Court ruling in 1927 which allowed for sterilization of mental health
patients. Moreover, American eugenics-oriented psychiatrists continued
to force sterilization on mental health patients into the 1970s.

Beginning
in 1910 and ending in 1944, a massive database of genetic information
on Americans and related eugenics articles were collected in a Rockefeller
and Carnegie-funded data repository known as the Eugenics
Record Office.

WWII
sent the public face and target of eugenics to scurry for cover as Hitler
applied the theory to the Jews, giving the eugenics movement a major
black eye. However, behind the scenes, American psychiatrists, German
psychiatrists, and the heads of Rockefeller maintained their close working
relationships.

At
the conclusion of WWII, the Rockefellers allotted land in New York City
to house the United Nations (UN), an organization founded on the core
beliefs of the elite eugenics thinkers.

A
wealthy Rockefeller family friend, England’s Sir Julian Huxley,
led the eugenics movement in England. Upon setting up the United Nations,
Huxley became the first Director-General of the United Nation’s
human-rights organization, UNESCO. In his 1946 sixty-page document titled,
“UNESCO:
Its Purpose and Philosophy,” he states:

The
general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism,
global in extent and evolutionary in background…its education
program can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize
all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty
from separate nations to world organization…Political unifications
in some sort of world government will be required…Even though
it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years
politically and psychologically impossible [thanks to Hitler], it will
be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenics problem is examined
with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the
issues at stake so that much that is now unthinkable may at least become
thinkable.

A
seismic shift is now occurring in the forces that will control health
care in the United States and around the world. It is a shift in power
away from the World Health Organization (WHO) and into a new alliance
of wealthy governments (the G8), United Nations groups, and elite international
non-governmental power brokers such as the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation. American taxpayers should be alarmed. This means that tens
of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars for “humanitarian”
foreign aide is being spent on objectives never approved by Congress.
Americans should pay attention when Bill Gates makes very public proclamations
about the need to reduce the surplus population.

In
February of 2010, Bill Gates explained that there are just too many
humans, as a key mathematical variable, involved in CO2 and global warming.
He thinks that a global effort on population control, utilizing vaccines
and birth control, can reduce the projected African population by one
billion people in year 2050. This requires many tens of billions of
U.S. taxpayer dollars to accomplish. The short
version or long
version of his speech is available to view on YouTube.

His
theory that overpopulation is a primary source for the cause of global
warming has also been presented in a 2009 report by the United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA), “Facing
a Changing World: Women, Population, and Climate.” UNFPA is
an example of a United Nations group that is helping to coordinate the
spending of billions in U.S. taxpayer funds to accomplish the global
elitist eugenics agenda.

Bill
Gates is not your traditional elitist, born into a family of wealth
and privilege. His wealth bought him entry into the elite club. Born
in 1915, David
Rockefeller Sr., is the oldest living patriarch of the Rockefeller
Empire and the undeniable kingpin in this arena. And he is not trying
to keep his life’s work a secret any longer.

In
his 2002 autobiography, Memoirs, he sets the record straight,
responding to all of those who have claimed he is working to manipulate
governments to create a New World Order. He states, “For more
than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political
spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller
family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American
political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of
a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States,
characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and
of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated
global political and economic structure—one world, if you will.
If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

In
a 2008 lecture he states, “Unless nations agree to work together
to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth,
overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects
for a decent life on our planet will be threatened.” Rockefeller
tries to place a “socially acceptable” spin on the need
for eugenics in modern times. Click
here to watch his calculated explanation.

A
key strategy of the eugenics movement is to package it, publicizing
seemingly helpful changes that, to most people, would appear to be advantageous.
The PR spin is all about helping the poor, fighting disease, solving
the oppression and inequality of women, improving women’s health,
and reducing childhood mortality, etc. It is a masterful cult in action,
enlisting the help of many unwitting people by getting them to believe
they are contributing to worthwhile objectives. Like any cult, once
you get past the slick marketing and PR façade, evil stench is
lurking.

FDA
Commissioner Margaret Hamburg’s Family Eugenics Tradition

One
of the leading scientific thinkers on the subject of eugenics in the
second half of the 20th century is FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg’s
father, psychiatrist David Hamburg, as well as her psychiatrist mother
Beatrix Hamburg.

David
Hamburg has had a major impact on U.S. government domestic public health
as well as international public health and politics. He has been head
of the National Institute of Health (NIH) from 1975 to 1980, member
of the U.S. Defense Policy Board during the Clinton era, member of president
Clinton’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, and member
of the Advisory Board of the Center for Preventive Action of the Council
on Foreign Relations—to name just a few of his involvements. Omitted
from his official bio is his role as director from 1989 to 1991 at the
American Eugenics Society (renamed the Society
for the Study of Social Biology, SSSB). His wife, Beatrix, served
as director
in 1983 and as vice president from 1984 to 1990.

Advertisement

Much
of David Hamburg’s work has been funded as a result of his role
as President of the Carnegie
Corporation of New York from 1982 to 1997, where he retains the
title, President Emeritus. The consortium of entities under the Rockefeller
and Carnegie banners do many things to accomplish the political and
social structure to facilitate a New World Order. This has included
significant national and global financial support for eugenics and programs
that promote eugenics philosophy.

David
Hamburg’s early training in genetics and psychiatry exposed him
to the eugenics theory of his time. In a 1979
speech to the American Public Health Association, he emphasized,
as head of NIH, the need to reduce population as part of preventive
health. He declared, “The adverse effects of exceedingly rapid
population growth are not only those affecting health, but also education,
economic development, resource depletion, pollution, conflict and violence.
Thus, in an increasingly independent world, the technically advanced
nations cannot afford to overlook these problems which are so burdensome
for most of the less developed countries. This involves biomedical and
behavioral sciences, in international collaborative efforts. Some promising
lines of inquiry deserve consideration here…to make possible an
array of contraceptive techniques and relate these to cultural preferences
with respect to acceptability. A practical approach to pregnancy interruption
is emerging.”

FDA
Commissioner Margaret Hamburg is quite proud of her parents, and her
record as New York City Health Commissioner shows she is on the same
page as Mom and Dad. When Margaret Hamburg joined her parents in 1994
as one of the all-time
youngest members of NIH, she said, “There was a sense of real
fun that the father-mother-daughter constellation had been formed.”

Understanding
the Scope of the “Free” Birth Control Services

The
August 1, 2011 United States Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) policy
declaration will mandate significant costs to the health care system,
as part of implementing Obama’s new health care plan. This policy
focuses on preventing unwanted pregnancies. This health care regulation
is based on recommendations provided by the Institute of Medicine (IOM)
in a July 19, 2011 report entitled “Clinical
Preventive Services for Women: Closing the Gaps,” which says
that 49 percent of pregnancies in the United States are unwanted. The
implementation of this policy will rely on this report, so it is interesting
uncovering the details of the recommendations that are not being made
widely public. The FDA will be the final decision maker as to what these
services comprise. Revealed below are direct quotes from the report.

Family
planning services that are provided to prevent unintended pregnancies
include contraception (i.e., all FDA-approved contraceptive drugs and
devices, sterilization procedures) as well as patient education and
counseling…unintended pregnancy is more likely among women who
are ages 18 to 24 years and unmarried, who have a low income, who are
not high school graduates, and who are members of a racial or ethnic
minority group.

A recent
systematic literature review found significantly increased odds of
preterm birth and low birth weight among unintended pregnancies ending
in live births compared with pregnancies that were intended…The
IOM Committee on Women’s Health Research recently identified
unintended pregnancy to be a health condition…all pregnancies
should be intended.

A wide array
of safe and highly effective FDA-approved methods of contraception
is available, including barrier methods, hormonal methods, emergency
contraception, and implanted devices; sterilization is also available
for women and for men (FDA, 2010)… The most common contraceptive
methods used in the United States are the oral contraceptive pill
and female sterilization. It is thought that greater use of long-acting,
reversible contraceptive methods—including intrauterine devices
and contraceptive implants that require less action by the woman and
therefore have lower use failure rates—might help further reduce
unintended pregnancy rates.

Cost barriers
to use of the most effective contraceptive methods are important because
long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods and sterilization have
high up-front costs…The elimination of cost sharing for contraception
therefore could greatly increase its use, including use of the more
effective and longer-acting methods, especially among poor and low-income
women most at risk for unintended pregnancy.

The committee
recommends for consideration as a preventive service for women: the
full range of Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive
methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling
for women with reproductive capacity.

According
to the report, an unintended pregnancy is now a newly defined disease
to be eradicated, hopefully by costly preventive intervention. Such
interventions include use of a eugenic movement favorite—sterilization.
It should be noted that the term “sterilization” was omitted
from the HHS press release and is only clearly explained in the full
IOM report, made inaccessible by requiring logging in before the report
can be downloaded and viewed. This deception by HHS is intentional,
meaning it intends to diminish the number of people that will spend
time trying to understand what health insurance plans we will now be
required to cover.

Advertisement

Abortion
as a solution to an unwanted pregnancy is not mentioned in this IOM
report for political reasons. However, since an unwanted pregnancy is
now being defined as an adverse health condition, the implication is
obvious for those acting on these guidelines. While funding for abortion
would not be covered by the scope of this HHS regulatory policy, naming
unwanted pregnancy as a health condition sets the stage for this to
be the next step.

The
health complications potentially arising from pre-term births, including
adverse epigenetic programming and future disease, are a legitimate
health issue. I would address this issue by improving the nutritional
status of these mothers, while if needed, providing a social safety
net, allowing them to live in a less stressful environment. No effort
has been made by the HHS or even suggested in the IOM report to, rather,
focus efforts on creating a set of stable circumstances for women so
they actually desire the child they are carrying—thereby ethically
wiping out the “new disease” of unwanted pregnancy.

New
Gene Technology Soon to Bring Eugenics to the Front and Center

Rapid
advancement in gene technology will for the first time allow for non-risky
genetic testing of fetal DNA within five weeks of conception. This groundbreaking
genetic testing will utilize unique fetal cells from the bloodstream
of the mother. While this is an enormous leap forward in technology
and has some legitimate value, it reopens the eugenics Pandora’s
box. This testing is a dream come true for the eugenics movement. It
will stimulate an impassioned social debate about who should be allowed
to be born at all and who should make this decision.

The
FDA will be intimately involved in all regulations relating to this
new technology and how it is controlled. This is an emerging market
with legal and financial implications that are actively being debated
by stakeholders and the FDA. The emerging industry wants to develop
at-home consumer testing for many of these new genetic testing tools.
Doctors want to monopolize on providing the tests as a new profit center.
And public health officials, such as those at the FDA, are trying to
figure out how this highly lucrative technology should be regulated.

The
day of genetic counseling is coming, with parents being presented with
a wide-variety of data about their unborn child’s health status,
future health risks, and even personality. And expect that the government
will want full access to the testing results. What will be the slant
on any counseling given with such services? Who will be forced to have
an abortion and who will regulate under what circumstances a woman may
have an abortion? Will taxpayers and insurance companies have to foot
the bill? Only time will tell.

Do
you trust FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg to make these decisions?
Do you trust her to set up the regulations, ultimately determining who
should be born?

United
States Health Care Now Reflects the Globalist Agenda

It
is fascinating that the Obama administration has endorsed an IOM report
that says all pregnancies should be wanted and that an unwanted pregnancy
is a medical health condition.

The
belief that all pregnancies should be wanted is a major tenant of the
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which as stated earlier is a
group bent on the eugenics goal of reducing world population. Funding
to UNFPA was cut off by Reagan and both Bush presidents, due to their
controversial
role in using U.S. taxpayer funds to implement abortion and sterilization.
UNFPA funding was restored in 2009 by President Obama.

The
new HHS regulatory mandate, defining what must now be covered for “free”
by health insurers, goes far beyond the issue of birth control services.
The following categories are listed to be covered by health insurers:

These
issues, one for one, are top priority issues of the United
Nations Population Fund, intended to be delivered as “free”
healthcare services to women around the globe. UNFPA is in a mad dash
to meet 2015 international deadlines for health implementation regarding
especially maternal health and reproductive health, as defined by a
set of international healthcare objectives known as the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs).

UNFPA
has been sounding the alarm that governments are moving too slowly to
accomplish their globalist health plan. This plea for action was culminated
during a UN meeting in New York this past April called the “Commission
on Population and Development.” At this meeting abortion
groups actively participated in the meetings and hosting panels.
This meeting ended with a policy
statement designed to influence the immediate actions of the United
States.

President
Obama has long promoted spending 50
billion U.S. taxpayer dollars per year to accomplish these Millennium
Development Goals, which are spearheaded by UNFPA. It is not surprising
that he is now marching lockstep with this globalist plan, responding
to their urgent plea for governments to speed up their efforts with
the IOM study and the resulting HHS regulatory declaration on August
1, 2011.

Americans
should understand that under these international influences we are expected
to pay for these “free” health services for all women both
nationally and internationally. On the national level this is being
accomplished through the new HHS regulations. Health care premiums for
everyone will rise to cover these costs (a form of regulatory taxation
and redistribution of wealth). Additionally, direct taxpayer contributions
will go to cover government spending on its Medicare and Medicaid requirements
to cover these services. Furthermore, tens of billions of U.S. dollars
in foreign aide goes directly into UNFPA and related groups. This is
taxpayer money that is being used to fund this agenda and the international
delivery of health care services for the world. UNFPA is one group advocating
for reduced global population.

The
fact that these efforts are directly associated with a massive effort
to reduce world population, a key theme of the eugenics movement, should
be clearly understood by all Americans. The slick repackaging of the
eugenics movement is now in high gear, is well-funded by U.S. taxpayers,
and is the leading-edge movement, stripping the United States of its
sovereignty and forcing Americans to comply with an international set
of priorities and regulations.

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

The
FDA will be used as the regulatory bully that enforces compliance. This
comes naturally to the FDA, which has a long history of using force
against any competition to suit whatever its priorities happen to be.
In this emerging New World Order power structure, the FDA is drastically
expanding its reach and will be called on to be an international regulatory
authority.

Americans
need to wake up and understand what is going on. Since it is now obvious
to the world that our country is broke, it is the perfect time to stop
the elite globalist movement from moving forward. We need to move to
cut off funding to the international health care movement and the new
HHS birth control regulations—we simply cannot afford them. It
is time to flood Congress with objections to these eugenics-promoting
initiatives and save our country and the rest of the world from the
immense pain and harm of this societal experiment.

Byron
J. Richards, Board-Certified Clinical Nutritionist, nationally-renowned
nutrition
expert, and founder of Wellness
Resources is a leader in advocating the value of dietary
supplements as a vital tool to maintain health. He is an outspoken
critic of government and Big Pharma efforts to deny access to natural
health products and has written extensively on the life-shortening and
health-damaging failures of the sickness
industry.