The Palestinian Battle against a Plan that Does Not Exist

While Palestinian hatred for President Trump and his administration does not come as a surprise, what is strange is that the two Palestinians factions -- Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip -- are now using the US president's awaited plan to throw mud at one another.

Mahmoud Abbas evidently wants the world to believe that Hamas is working for Trump and Israel. Hamas, for its part, wants Palestinians to believe that if anyone is part of the Trump administration's "conspiracy," it is Abbas and his Fatah faction.

Guess who gets caught in the crossfire -- again. The Palestinians. It is they who continue to pay the price for the vicious strife between their "leaders" -- in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas evidently wants the world to believe that Hamas is working for President Trump and Israel. Pictured: Abbas delivers a speech at the UN General Assembly on September 27, 2018 in New York City. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

No Palestinian -- or anyone else for that matter -- has been made privy to US President Donald J. Trump's long-awaited plan for peace in the Middle East, which has also been referred to as the "deal of the century." This minor detail however, has not prevented the Palestinians from rejecting the rumored plan, on the pretext that it is aimed at "liquidating" the Palestinian cause and national rights.

Hardly a day passes without Palestinian leaders and officials across the political spectrum behaving as if they know every detail of the "deal of the century." The Palestinians are not even prepared to wait until the US administration actually presents a plan.

The Palestinian rejection of a yet-to-be-announced peace plan should not surprise anyone. The Palestinians will never accept any plan from a US administration they consider extremely "hostile" to the Palestinians and "biased" in favor of Israel.

Even before Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital in December 2017, the Palestinians had made up their minds: As Trump administration is on the side of Israel, and its policies seem mainly designed to appease and strengthen Israel, the Palestinians apparently decided that they should boycott the US administration. This boycott is unlikely to end in the foreseeable future, especially in light of continued Palestinian denunciations of the US administration and its policies towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Palestinians, it appears, have become hostage to their own vitriolic rhetoric. It is hard to see how after nearly a year of attacks on the Trump administration, any Palestinian leader would be able to accept the proposed "deal of the century," no matter what is in it, or to have any dealings with US officials. The massive anti-US campaign that the Palestinian leaders have been waging for the past few months in the media and every available platform has made it impossible, if not dangerous, for any Palestinian leader to do business with the Trump administration.

While Palestinian hatred for Trump and his administration does not come as a surprise, what is strange is that the two Palestinians factions -- Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza Strip -- are now using the President Trump's awaited plan to throw mud at one another.

The two rival Palestinian parties have been at each other's throats for many years and are still engaged in a power struggle. Hamas and Fatah hate each other so much that they are even prepared to accuse each other of "collaborating with the enemies," America and Israel.

President Trump is most likely unaware that he has secret Palestinian "agents" working for him in Fatah and Hamas. This is only true, of course, if one is to take seriously the mutual accusations made by Fatah and Hamas.

Welcome to the Palestinians' Theater of the Absurd, where fabrication, lies and conspiracy theories have long been part of the fabric of Palestinian culture and society.

It is a sign of the times that Fatah, ruled by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, would accuse Hamas of being in collusion with an Israeli-American plot "to destroy the Palestinian national project." In other words, Fatah is telling the world that Hamas -- an Islamist movement that has killed and injured thousands of Jews and many others since its establishment three decades ago -- is now working with the enemies of the Palestinians against the interests of its own people.

Consider, for example, the reaction of the Fatah and its leaders to the recent effort to solve the power shortage in the Hamas-ruled coastal enclave of Gaza. Qatar paid for the fuel needed to keep the power plant there running, while Israel facilitated the delivery of the fuel with the help of the United Nations. Outraged by the aid to the Gaza Strip, Abbas's Fatah claimed that Hamas was "practically implementing the deal of the century." Fatah seems convinced that Trump's plan aims at separating the West Bank from the Gaza Strip and establishing an independent Palestinian state only in the Gaza Strip. Fatah and its leader, Abbas, claim that Hamas's readiness to conduct indirect negotiations with Israel -- about a truce and humanitarian and economic aid to the Gaza Strip -- facilitates the US administration's goal of "consolidating" the split between the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

According to a statement issued by Fatah in Ramallah, the (unseen) "deal of the century" requires Palestinians to "give up Jerusalem and the right of return and the right for compensation for Palestinian refugees." Trump's plan, according to Fatah's imagination, also envisages separating the West Bank from the Gaza Strip "to prevent the establishment of an independent and sovereign state, on the pre-1967 armistice lines, with Jerusalem as its capital."

What Fatah is telling everyone is that Hamas leaders are traitors because they agreed to accept Qatari-funded fuel for the power plant in the Gaza Strip. The Fatah leaders also appear to want Palestinians and the rest of the world to believe that by accepting the fuel and conducting indirect negotiations with Israel to reach a truce agreement in the Gaza Strip, Hamas has "given up the rights of the Palestinians."

No one knows on what basis Fatah is making these claims about a plan that does not yet even exist. Perhaps these allegations can be traced to unconfirmed reports in various Arab and Western media outlets. Evidently, the Palestinians have taken these speculations as facts and have built entire arguments around them.

In the West Bank, the PLO Executive Committee, another Ramallah-based Palestinian body dominated by Abbas loyalists, echoed the same charge against Hamas. After a meeting on October 11, the committee "affirmed its rejection of the plan to separate the Gaza Strip from the West Bank" as part of the "deal of the century." Again, this is an accusation by Abbas and his officials that is aimed at convincing Palestinians that Hamas is involved in a conspiracy against them and their rights. Abbas evidently wants the world to believe that Hamas is working for Trump and Israel.

Hamas, for its part, wants Palestinians to believe that if anyone is part of the Trump administration's "conspiracy," it is Abbas and his Fatah faction. Hamas's message to the Palestinians basically boils down to this: "We're not the traitors working with Israel and Trump. The real traitors are Abbas and his Fatah, who are imposing economic sanctions on the Gaza Strip and obstructing efforts to improve the living conditions of the Palestinians."

"The Palestinian Authority," said Hamas spokesman Hazel Qassem, "has paved the way for the implementation of the US vision for liquidating the Palestinian cause". He was referring to Abbas's refusal to lift the economic and financial sanctions which the PA president imposed on the Gaza Strip last year, apparently as part of an attempt to undermine Hamas.

The Trump administration would doubtless be overjoyed to hear that Hamas and Fatah have become "collaborators" and "agents" working with the US and Israel. On the one hand, however, Fatah and Hamas say they are strongly opposed to Trump's upcoming peace plan. On the other, the two rival Palestinians parties are now accusing each other of collaborating with the Trump administration to help him pass his upcoming "deal of the century."

Guess who gets caught in the crossfire -- again? The Palestinians. It is they who continue to pay the price for the vicious strife between their "leaders" -- in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem, is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Comment on this item

9 Reader Comments

Zmam • Oct 28, 2018 at 03:36

Palestinians will not solve their problems rationally unless they accept the the Jewish State as independent and let the Jewish people live peacefully. As the writer pointed out, the only the two factions have common to talk is the Israeli issue. There is a mistrust between them. They are totally different groups who hijacked the genuine aspirations of the Palestinians quest for freedom for decades. The religiosity of the issue and the external factor (Moslem's from Arabs and Iranian forces) who fuel the conflict for their own fanatic benefits, the peace is no where near. In my opinion, I wouldn't support Trump's policy on Jerusalem. The status quo policy of previous US Administrations would better good solution to the issue of Jerusalem as the sticking point. It would rather be Jerusalem as the International city for the three Abrahamic religions (Jewish, Christian and Moslem city).

International community forged so many conferences to address and solve the Israeli-Palestinian issue, yet non-worked. From Oslo peace agreement in 1994 till the Second intifada (rebellious uprisings) in 2000, still the drama goes on.. I think by now the international community is sick and tired of the issue. That is why Trump made the decision. But I don't think it's the best one. If so, only time will tell.

Reply->

TT • Oct 17, 2018 at 11:38

From the "Palestinian" perspective, the bare minimum for any peace agreement involves assurances that the Jewish State of Israel can at least eventually be destroyed, either through indefensible Israeli borders or demographically with Arab "refugee return".

Reply->

CR • Oct 16, 2018 at 22:20

With all due respect to Mr. Toameh, perhaps the problem is in fact the people themselves. The past century has shown a disappointing and disturbing lack of discretion in selecting leadership. From Amin Husseini to Gamal Nasser to Yasir Arafat, PLO to Hamas to Islamic Jihad to Hizb'Ullah, their leadership has shown only one tendency; "Slaughter the Jew!" The privations, death and destruction this policy has wrought are of no consequence, apparently, except to serve as fresh "Zionist criminal aggression" that must be "avenged." Were there any substantial constituency that opposed that sentiment would there not be organizations devoted to reconciliation with Israel and lobbying for an end to the conflict and coexistence as a goal? To my knowledge none has ever emerged. We must conclude these actions and sentiments have substantial majority support.

Mr Toameh, the international community is not coming to rescue anyone. If a strong, prosperous and durable State of Palestine is to be in the offing the Palestinians will have to take the efforts themselves to right the wrongs their own governments have perpetrated. There is no other way.

Reply->

Bisley • Oct 15, 2018 at 21:10

Neither Fatah, or Hamas want peace. Their primary interest is in maintaining and expanding their power, and without the "struggle" against Israel to inflame their people, they would have little basis from which to generate public support. Their major worry about any sort of peace proposal is that it might be good enough to attract support among Palestinians. It makes no difference what it is, or might be, or who is behind it; they have to condemn it and propagandize their public against it (and if it gives them the opportunity to each accuse the other of collaborating with the enemy, that's a bonus).

Reply->

Reform School • Oct 15, 2018 at 20:44

Through 14 centuries of Islamic expansion by the sword, have notable Arab contributions to civilization extended beyond repression and disintegration?

Reply->

Maha • Oct 15, 2018 at 09:59

The only "deal of the century" either of these terrorist entities would approve of would be the murder of every Jew in Israel, and a complete takeover of every square foot of the land. This is what they want, what they teach their children, and is their ultimate goal.

Reply->

Erica Ling • Oct 15, 2018 at 09:35

Any discussion on either the PA or Hamas is rather like going through C.S. Lewis' wardrobe, emerging into a world of pure fantasy. Such a shame we no longer have personal combat for leaders. So many of us would enjoy seeing Abbas and Haniya in a ring, settling their differences like real medieval men whilst their people are safe.

Reply->

Hamish MacDonald • Oct 15, 2018 at 06:33

Very well executed article.John Esposito in his textual work "Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam", pointed to the factions in Islam, impossible to predict when blood letting would happen, some liberal, others fundamentalist and the Wahhabi influence in particular. These elements are unrelated to democratic thought of Israel or of the US.
Lies beget lies. Taqiyya begets Taqiyya.
What more can be expected?

Reply->

jeb • Oct 15, 2018 at 05:54

The Palestinians are people without representative government, Abbas was elected but refuses to hold more elections. To stay in power he needs enemies. If we know anything about the Palestinian leadership, its all about them.

The UNWRA run schools have done nothing and even go along with the exploitation of the Palestinians kept prisoner by their own leadership in Camps, what would they do if they were suddenly no longer had refugee status? The only way forward for the Palestinian people is to begin building their state in accord with the two state solution. But that requires making peace with the Israelis and because of their religious bigotry that may never be possible. What is despicable is the UN also seems to concur with the bigots.

Bahareh Hedayat is a human rights activist who has spent over six years in an Iranian prison for "insulting" Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and for "actions against national security, propagation of falsehoods, mutiny and illegal congregation." Hedayat is the longest serving female prisoner of conscience in Iran.

The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute.
Both reserve the right not to publish replies to articles should they so choose.
Gatestone Institute is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization, Federal Tax ID #454724565.