...Yet, in just under four
years, the 9/11 “truth movement” has ground
to a halt. Apart from the fundamental
incoherence of their theories, the downfall
of the 9/11 denier juggernaut was good
old-fashioned skepticism at its finest, the
kind that conjures visions of James Randi
challenging psychics and faith healers on
their home turfs and winning. Skeptics are
better at their jobs than they think, and
its important to give credit where credit is
due.

Staking their fortunes almost solely on
Internet-based content may have been the
9/11 deniers’ biggest mistake. What seems
like a perfect place for pseudoscience — the
Internet is un-edited, without fact-checkers
or minimum publishing standards of any kind
— also became a perfect place for a
rapid-response system of blogs and forums to
fight back. Drawing on the freely available
technical information from the NIST, FEMA,
and academic journals which most colleges
let their students access for free,
skeptical sites like
ScrewLooseChange.blogspot.com and
debunking911.com are able to defuse 9/11
denier claims as they arise...

Important New Site ~
http://www.ae911truth.infoaddresses the misleading and
deceitful conspiracy industries latest attempt at creating
consumers for their products. From their blatant appeal to
authority to misapplied science, ae911truth.info is a must
for anyone seriously looking for truth.

New
link ~Frequently Asked
Questions -
"Why do you use the term "debunking" in your name? Doesn't
that prove you already think you're right?"... "Why do you
hide your identity?" "Who funds your site?"...The answer to
those questions and much more are in the FAQ. Please read
the FAQ before sending e-mail. Your questions about this
site may already be answered.

New ~
WTC 7 explained in Structure Magazine.
"Single Point of Failure: How the Loss of One Column May
Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7" points out that the
failure of column 79 in the lower levels will create the
very effect we see in videos

New
Paper ~ Professor
of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering at
Cambridge University passes yet another
peer reviewed paper by a RESPECTED engineering Journal
saying the towers collapsed the way they did without the
need of explosives.

Update ~
The
real conspiracy, the administrations rush to war and the
evidence for an investigation people should be fighting for.

Molten Steel Explained - Conspiracy sites
like to bring up molten steel found 6 weeks after the
buildings fell to suggest a bomb must have created the
effect. There is another explanation which is more
plausible.

"Iron Burns!!! Mark R
Ferran's E-mails to the scholars explaining to them how iron
can burn/oxidize in low temperature fires.

World Trade Center 7
- Firefighter interviews proving Silverstein meant "pull" the
ongoing [rescue operations] out of building 7's immediate
area. Proof also that Building 7 was a lot worse than
conspiracy theorists lead you to believe.

Columns and Trusses
- Photographic evidence the trusses sagged due to fire and
pulled the columns in causing the catastrophic collapse.

Peer
Reviewed Paper
- A look at the only paper which passed peer review on what
caused the WTC collapse and the people behind it.

The Fire
- The fireman's quote saying all that was needed was two
fire hoses to put out the fires is taken out of context by
conspiracy theorists.

The
Firefighter Quotes - Evidence that conspiracy
theorists are lying and taking firefighter quotes out of
context.

Civil
Engineers' QuotesStructural
and Civil Engineers who have spoken out against Controlled
Demolition conspiracy theory.

Osama Bin
Laden - "A few Arabs in the desert
could not have pulled this off..." Why Osama is perfect for
this attack.

The Zogby Poll
- Conspiracy sites point to a Zogby poll which they suggest
proves that the American people think the government blew up the towers.
Why that's not the case.