Trump’s budget would slash money for Sound Transit, Tacoma Link

President Donald Trump proposed $200 billion in new infrastructure spending on Monday, while at the same time reiterating his desire to slash funding on public transit infrastructure in Washington and across the country.

For the second consecutive year, Trump’s proposed budget would eliminate federal funding for future transit lines throughout Washington state, from Seattle’s downtown streetcar, to light rail between Northgate and Lynnwood, to a six-mile bus line in Spokane.

Both Trump’s budget and his infrastructure plan face very long odds of becoming law. While Trump asked for similar cuts to transit programs last year, the bipartisan budget agreement reached last week bears little resemblance to Trump’s proposal.

Some estimates said the infrastructure cuts in Trump’s proposed budget were as large or larger as the new spending he proposed.

Never miss a local story.

Sign up today for unlimited digital access to our website, apps, the digital newspaper and more.

Trump’s budget would eliminate the New Starts program, preserving funding only for projects that have received final approval.

Sound Transit CEO Peter Rogoff, in a phone interview Monday, said he was “greatly disappointed” in the budget proposal, but he was hopeful Congress would not go along.

Rogoff said he met with four different congressional committees last week and members of both parties, and he did not hear support for proposals to cut transit grants.

He reiterated his past refrain, that Lynnwood Link will be completed whether it gets the federal funding or not, “the question is when.”

Sound Transit has done analyses of how much cuts to federal funding — or to car- tab revenues — might delay the project but would disclose and discuss those at a future board meeting, he said.

As part of the budget, Trump released his long-awaited infrastructure plan, a broad outline that would spend $200 billion in federal money over the next 10 years, aiming to leverage local, state and private dollars into more than $1 trillion in additional spending.

The Trump administration said it wants to ax the New Starts money because its new infrastructure program will “incentivize states and localities to raise new revenue” and that can be used to fund projects “prioritized by those communities.”

Every Washington transit project that Trump’s budget would cut was proposed by local transit agencies and already includes local funding.

Rogoff called the administration’s rationale “maddening.”

“The administration, from the very beginning, has sometimes liked to refer to these transit-expansion projects as quote-unquote local projects and therefore they should be funded locally,” Rogoff said. “Let’s understand that we are funding these overwhelmingly with local dollars.”

Rogoff also vented at the infrastructure initiative’s specific allocation of money to rural roads.

“Please explain to me why transit-expansion projects in huge international hubs are considered a local project but grants for rural-road improvements are not local projects,” he said. “There seems to be something about delivering people in trains and buses that is very hard for this administration to support.”

It’s unclear if the $200 billion proposed in the infrastructure plan would outweigh the infrastructure cuts elsewhere in the budget.

Far from the $1.5 trillion boost that Trump is touting, the study found that on net, infrastructure spending could be cut by as much as $55 billion over 10 years.

And there are elements in the infrastructure plan that could be particularly harmful to Sound Transit.

For instance, no more than 5 percent of the new funding could go to fund projects approved before the infrastructure plan went into effect.

That would severely curtail the funding available for already approved Sound Transit projects.

And the infrastructure plan would allow federal funding to cover no more than 20 percent of an individual project.

Gov. Jay Inslee highlighted that Trump’s infrastructure plan counted on states, local governments and private spending for 85 percent of its money.

“His plan would essentially throw a few Legos when what we really need is concrete and steel,” Inslee, a Democrat, said in a statement. “States cannot and should not bear the burden of building a 21st century infrastructure on our own.”

The infrastructure plan also envisions selling off government-owned assets, such as airports and highways, if agencies think that private operation of the facilities would help taxpayers.

It specifically cites the Bonneville Power Administration’s transmission facilities, which provide power to broad swaths of the Northwest, as an example of what could be sold off.

“I will not support legislation that attempts to use smoke screens and fake math to privatize projects and enrich Wall Street,” Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said in a statement.