I was watching him and Bart Ehrman (also not one of my favorite debaters) debate Theodicy ...

Bart may not the most charismatic SPEAKER but as an ATHEIST DEBATER his arguments are as solid as any I've heard - his opening arguments on unexplained suffering are the most persuasive on the issue that I've ever heard. And also on our right to question God - simply the most liberating. They resonate with every molecule of my being and are easily the two main things underpinning my atheism

And in contrast we have Dinesh arguing that if God intervenes then "evil will lose its meaning" ..... FFS

But for worse apologists keep an eye on the mailbox right here on WWHA - they drop by regularly

I was watching him and Bart Ehrman (also not one of my favorite debaters) debate Theodicy ...

Bart may not the most charismatic SPEAKER but as an ATHEIST DEBATER his arguments are as solid as any I've heard - his opening arguments on unexplained suffering are the most persuasive on the issue that I've ever heard. And also on our right to question God - simply the most liberating. They resonate with every molecule of my being and are easily the two main things underpinning my atheism

And in contrast we have Dinesh arguing that if God intervenes then "evil will lose its meaning" ..... FFS

But for worse apologists keep an eye on the mailbox right here on WWHA - they drop by regularly

Bart lets too many points get by on him. His arguments are good, but he's not that good on defense. Next time I watch one I'll point it out.

I don't know, Comfort's a likable guy. Not like Kirk Cameron who is a douche.

-Nam

I don't know if I've seen enough of Comfort to decide if he's a complete jackass or not. But I chose him for this thread as the arguments I've heard from him are the worst I've heard from an apologist. I think everyone here has seen the "atheist nightmare" video and for those who haven't.

But I agree with you on Cameron. Someone needs to headbutt the condescending smugness from his face.

I don't know if I've seen enough of Comfort to decide if he's a complete jackass or not. But I chose him for this thread as the arguments I've heard from him are the worst I've heard from an apologist.

Don't get me wrong, almost everything he says is nonsense but I find him likable. Like George Bush Jr., he's overtly a fucktard but still likable.