Available with prior consent of the CELT programme for purposes of academic research and teaching only.

The text is here reproduced with kind permission of the editor.

Edition
Aindrias Ó Cathasaigh (ed.), James Connolly: The Lost Writings (London 1997).
Selected further reading
James Connolly and William Walker, The Connolly-Walker controversy on socialist unity in Ireland (Dublin 1911, repr. Cork 1986).Robert Lynd, James Connolly: an appreciation, to James Connolly, Collected works (2 vols, October 1916, repr. Dublin 1987) i, pp. 495-507.Lambert McKenna, The social teachings of James Connolly (Dublin 1920).Desmond Ryan, James Connolly: his life, work and writings (Dublin 1924).G. Schüller, James Connolly and Irish freedom: a marxist analysis (Chicago 1926, repr. Cork 1974).Noelle Davis, Connolly of Ireland: patriot and socialist (Carnarvon 1946).Richard Michael Fox, James Connolly: the forerunner (Tralee 1946).Desmond Ryan, Socialism and nationalism: a selection from the writings of James Connolly (Dublin 1948).Desmond Ryan, 'James Connolly', in J. W. Boyle (ed.), Leaders and workers (Cork 1960, repr. 1978).C. Desmond Greaves, The life and times of James Connolly (London 1961, repr. Berlin 1976).François Bédarida, Le socialisme et la nation: James Connolly et l'Irlande (Paris 1965).Joseph Deasy, James Connolly: his life and teachings (Dublin 1966).James Connolly, Press poisoners in Ireland and other articles (Belfast 1968).James Connolly, Yellow unions in Ireland and other articles (Belfast 1968).Peter McKevitt, James Connolly (Dublin 1969).Owen Dudley Edwards, The mind of an activist: James Connolly (Dublin 1981).Derry Kelleher, Quotations from James Connolly: an anthology in three parts (2 vols Drogheda 1972).Peter Berresford Ellis (ed.), James Connolly: selected writings edited with an introduction by P. Berresford Ellis (Harmondsworth 1973).Samuel Levenson, James Connolly: a biography (London 1973).James Connolly, Ireland upon the dissecting table: James Connolly on Ulster and Partition (Cork 1975).Nora Connolly O'Brien, James Connolly: portrait of a rebel father (Dublin 1975).E. Strauss, Irish nationalism and British democracy (Westport CT 1975).Bernard Ransom, Connolly's Marxism (London 1980).Communist Party of Ireland, Breaking the chains: selected writings of James Connolly on women (Belfast 1981).Ruth Dudley Edwards, James Connolly (Dublin 1981).Brian Kelly, James Connolly and the fight for an Irish Workers' Republic (Cleveland, OH 1982).John F. Murphy, Implications of the Irish past: the socialist ideology of James Connolly from an historical perspective (unpubl. MA thesis, University of North Carolina at Charlotte 1983).Anthony Lake, James Connolly: the development of his political ideology (unpubl. MA thesis, NUI Cork 1984).Frederick Ryan, Socialism, democracy and the Church (Dublin 1984). With reviews of Connolly's 'Labour in Irish History' and Jaurès' 'Studies in socialism'.Connolly: the Polish aspects: a review of James Connolly's political and spiritual affinity with Józef Pilsudski, leader of the Polish Socialist Party, organiser of the Polish legions and founder of the Polish state (Belfast 1985).X. T. Zagladina, James Connolly (Moscow 1985).James Connolly and Daniel De Leon, The Connolly-De Leon Controversy: On wages, marriage and the Church (London 1986).David Howell, A Lost Left: three studies in socialism and nationalism (Chicago 1986).Priscilla Metscher, Republicanism and socialism in Ireland: a study of the relationship of politics and ideology from the United Irishmen to James Connolly, Bremer Beiträge zur Literatur- und Ideologiegeschichte 2 (Frankfurt-am-Main 1986).Michael O'Riordan, General introduction, to James Connolly, Collected works (2 vols Dublin 1987) i, pp. ix-xvii.Cathal O'Shannon, Introduction, to James Connolly, Collected works (2 vols Dublin 1987) i, 11-16Austen Morgan, James Connolly: a political biography (Manchester 1988).Helen Clark, Sing a rebel song: the story of James Connolly, born Edinburgh 1868, executed Dublin 1916 (Edinburgh 1989).Kieran Allen, The politics of James Connolly (London 1990).Andy Johnston, James Larraggy and Edward McWilliams, Connolly: a Marxist analysis (Dublin 1990).Lambert McKenna, The social teachings of James Connolly, by Lambert McKenna, ed. Thomas J. Morrissey (Dublin 1991).Donnacha Ní Gabhann, The reality of Connolly: 1868-1916 (Dublin 1993).William K. Anderson, James Connolly and the Irish left (Dublin 1994).Proinsias Mac Aonghusa, What Connolly said: James Connolly's writings (Dublin 1994).James L. Hyland, James Connolly: life and times (Dundalk 1997).William McMullen, With James Connolly in Belfast (Belfast 2001).Donal Nevin, James Connolly: a full life (Dublin 2005).James ConnollyDifficulties of SocialismAindrias Ó CathasaighJames Connolly: The Lost WritingsPlutoLondon199742-44

CELT: Corpus of Electronic Texts

the whole essay.

Text has been proof-read twice and parsed using SGMLS.

The electronic text represents the edited text. Italicized or capitalized sections of the text are tagged emph.

There are no quotations.

Soft hyphens are silently removed. When a hyphenated word (and subsequent punctuation mark) crosses a page-break, this break is marked after the completion of the word (and punctuation mark).

div0=the whole text; div1=the essay. Page-breaks are marked pb n="".

Dates are standardized in the ISO form yyyy-mm-dd.

Names of persons (given names), and places are not tagged. Terms for cultural and social roles are not tagged.

In every discussion on the aims and objects of a Socialist Party some one is sure to bring up the objection that even if the Socialist Party were to conquer their opponents, and make an effort to establish their ideal as a political and social edifice, the difficulties which would arise out of the inability of the common people to understand the complexity of the social system they were called upon to administer, would infallibly produce the downfall of the new order. This objection is, it seems to us, rather far fetched in view of the circumstance that
the majority of those who at the present day are entrusted with the work of organizing and administering the capitalist system are completely ignorant of every development of the system outside of their own particular sphere of employment.

It is not at all necessary that everyone, or even a very large number, of those engaged in labour should be able to give an intelligent account of the multifarious processes of production, nor yet that they should be qualified even to trace the passage of the commodities upon which they are employed through all their stages from the crudity of the raw material up to the perfection of the finished product as it eventually reaches the hands of the purchaser. It is only necessary that each worker should perform with due skill and scrupulosity his own allotted task; to the few required as organisers of industry may be left the work of adjusting and interlocking the parts. Even this latter function – formidable as it may look when thus baldly stated – may be reduced to a mere automatic function to be executed as a part of the routine work of a clerical staff.

Any person reflecting upon the mechanism of the capitalist system can readily perceive how little its most important arteries of commerce are dependent upon international organization, and how much upon the reciprocal action of the economic interests involved at first hand. Where the international organization of Socialism will indeed come into play it will come to smooth over and simplify many of the difficulties which are constantly arising under capitalism as a result of the clashing of personal interests. Hence the Socialist organization of industry will preserve the effectiveness due to the development of capitalism whilst entirely obviating the friction and disputes capitalist competition entails.

It is well also to remember the multitude of things which in civilised society we are all compelled to take upon trust at the word of others. It is safe to say that what is called 'progress,' or civilisation, would be impossible were each individual in the community, or even a majority, to insist upon acquiring a complete theoretical and technical mastery of, say, each new application of Science to the needs of life before consenting to allow its use. There are few persons nowadays who would shrink from trusting themselves to railway trains, even although in all but complete ignorance of the mechanism of the steam engine, signal-boxes, points, and brakes; we have had gas in our houses, shops, and public buildings for several generations, but to this day the number of those who really
understand the processes of gas production, storage, and distribution are extraordinarily few, yet that does not prevent us using it despite its well known poisonous and explosive nature. And so we might go on enumerating many things in daily use – the use of which involves risk to life – which are accepted and freely utilised by people at large without stopping to acquire a perfect knowledge of their active principle.

Much the same might be said of the pretended wonderful and mysterious results to be attained under Socialism – results too wonderful to be realised. In Socialism there is nothing so abnormal that its realization could exceed in strangeness things we see around us every day, and composedly accept with the greatest equanimity. In the proposition that the community can so arrange the work of production and distribution that plenty can be provided for every human being, there is nothing, in view of present day machinery, half so extraordinary as the fact that if a gentleman sitting down to dinner in Dublin sends a telegram to a friend in Australia that friend will have received said telegram before his Dublin correspondent could have finished the final course of his repast. The fact that people in Ireland were reading accounts of battles in South Africa, 7,000 miles off, while those battles were still in progress, is far more intrinsically wonderful than a system of society in which labour enjoys the product of its toil, and neither hereditary tyrants nor capitalist exploiters are tolerated.

If these stranger developments have been accepted whilst Socialism is still rejected, it is because the personal economic interests of the classes controlling the educative and governing forces of the world are in line with such developments, while the same personal economic interests of those classes are as directly opposed to Socialism. But the workers are in the majority, and their interests are in line with Socialism, which may, therefore, be realised as soon as they desire, and are resolute enough to put their desires into practice.