The Iran Deal: A Millennial Perspective

Negotiators reached a historic agreement on July 14, 2015 to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities in return for lifting international oil and financial sanctions. Currently, the deal is pending in Congress. Congress has the right to review the deal, to approve or disapprove it, and then to overrule a presidential veto if a sufficient number of members of Congress choose to do so. While it is likely that the deal will pass, should Congress disapprove, it would cast doubt on the United States’ ability as a global leader and would likely send the international community into chaos.

For America, France, Britain, China, Russia, and Germany, the deal is an opportunity to prevent Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear warhead. The goal is to extend Iran’s “breakout capability”—the amount of time needed to create enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon. The current time was estimated to be somewhere between two months and a year. The Iran deal seeks to expand the breakout capability to a decade or more.

For Iran, the repeal of sanctions will allow for robust economic growth. The country has long suffered under the severity of these sanctions, which have crippled Iran’s resource-driven economy particularly their crude petroleum production and exportation.

In order to increase Iran’s breakout capability, the deal outlines two systems by which to curb the uranium and plutonium paths to creating a nuclear warhead. To curb uranium, Iran has agreed to convert or shutdown nearly half of its centrifuges and to limit enrichment to 3.7%. This is considered insufficient for a bomb rush. To curb plutonium, Iran has agreed to redesign the Arak reactor so it cannot produce weapon-grade plutonium. Furthermore, they agreed to not build any more heavy nuclear reactors for fifteen years.

The Iran deal has been highly discussed over the past month since President Obama announced the agreement’s accord. The deal has ardent critics and supporters. Those against the deal believe that it merely delayed the inevitable and in fact structured a timeline for Iran to build a bomb over the next decade. Furthermore, critics believe that the billions of dollars soon to pour into Iran due to the repeal of sanctions will be used for state-funded terrorism in the Middle East.

However, critics have yet to propose viable alternatives. The two most debated are war and increased sanctions. Most America’s are vehemently against going to war in Iran over the production of a nuclear bomb; however, war is likely the backup plan in D.C. should Iran make sudden movement towards a bomb rush. The other alternative would likely cast Iran into massive economic decay. The country’s leadership, elected on the basis of economic recovery, would be ousted, and anti-American leadership would likely take hold and revolt against the severity of increased sanctions. Of course the reasoning behind both of these alternatives is hypothetical; however, neither seems to pose a serious alternative to diplomacy.

All in all, the opportunity in the Iran deal lies in a stable Middle East and a potential ally in Iran. Ideally this will be accomplished by time: President Obama’s hope is that as the years pass, the more moderate democratic Iranian youth will begin to lead the country to a more pro-western outlook. It is hard to say that this is entirely likely or that the deal will do anything but extend the timeline for a nuclear warhead, but without viable alternatives, diplomacy, in a time of chaos, seems like our best hope.

1 comment

Working with women candidates in #Nigeria is different than our experience with typical partners who operate in firmly established democracies. These women are courageous, putting their status, reputation & careers on the line. #democracyblog.voatz.com/?p=90…

We appreciate the @CSGovts working group for leading this initiative. Montana's SB124 will ease the absentee voting process for #UOCAVA by replacing the print-sign-scan steps with valid #CommonAccessCards digital signatures. This legislation will save time and effort for voters. twitter.com/CSGovts/…

Earlier this year, our team was humbled to travel to #Nigeria to pilot a new technology platform allowing courageous #women candidates to raise funds and find followers along the #campaign trail. Learn more here: blog.voatz.com/?p=90…

“It’s pretty cool that I was one of the first to try it out. I hope it becomes available to all places. No matter where I live I’d love to feel comfortable knowing I could vote this way again.” -@PeaceCorps Volunteer on #mobilevoting in #2018midtermsbit.ly/2GFW4AZ

With no early voting and a low number of unevenly distributed polling locations, New Yorkers face tough obstacles to #voting. Mobile election technology could help the city improve voter #accessibility and turnout. bit.ly/2vFNTyn

“You know, most of my friends didn’t vote because it was too complicated with the way the mail is (or isn't) here. Most were jealous and hoped they could get the chance to vote this way someday.” -@PeaceCorps Volunteer on #mobilevoting in #2018Midtermsbit.ly/2GFW4AZ

When it came time to #vote in the 2018 U.S. Midterm #Elections, finding a way for Amiti Maloy make sure she could— all the way from her tiny village in a country with no postal system — was critical. This is the story of how she cast her mobile ballot. bit.ly/2GFW4AZ