We raise 'little kids' to be ethical, healthy people, right?
We are their examples of how to behave in the world?
Are we 'protecting' them from a healthy open Loving life?
Little kids pee just like grandpa (perhaps not as long... *__- ), use the restroom just like mommy, has no neurosis just like mommy and daddy!

The FACTS are that there are already problems with promiscuity AND sexual assaults in school restrooms DESPITE the segregation.

The same as shoplifting still happens in stores despite cameras, alarm tags and so on.

Since shoplifting still occurs, would you actually argue that it makes sense they should just go tear down all the cameras and related loss prevention
technologies?

Hardly a spec of difference with the school restrooms (even the same age demographics as the biggest 'group' to do the swiping), except the part we're
talking about little kids getting sexually assaulted. If there is anything (besides kids getting murdered) more important than protecting kids from
sexual assault, please do let me know.

What has now occurred to me is maybe this whole big picture is being framed wrong: Instead of it being about what gender they 'think' they are it
should be about what their sexual preference is. If say "trans" boys are still attracted to females then who could seriously argue they should go
into the little girls room?

Moving on, I think I know how to test if their 'gender identity' is for real, in these regards....

Males have a hardwired tendency to look at girls 'whatever'. The eyes wander, to say the least. This can hardly be helped. BARELY. It isn't something
that is a learned gender role, its just REALITY. There has to be plenty of published science about this. What post-adolescent male could argue against
this? SO there it is: visual cue testing to see if they still have the hardwired tendency to peek / eyes wander at etc. Likewise, transgender girls,
if their brains truly are male'ish, should grow this tendency, which could be tested for. Girls dont have this normally, boys can hardly help it even
when they intend to.

I liken it to how the human brain is hardwired to "find the face", that is there's a portion of the brain speific to seeking out & deciphering other
human faces. Dogs are entirely incapable of seeing our faces like we can because they dont have this. Likewise, when this portion of the brain is
damaged it become incapable of distinguishing faces.

Once thought to be incredibly rare, with only 100 or so documented cases up until the last decade or so, it’s now thought that around 1 in every 50
people suffers from this condition; though for most, they just have a really hard time recognizing people by their faces. For instance, in one study,
a person with this condition was shown a picture of Elvis Presley and thought it was Brooke Shields. www.todayifoundout.com...

Armed with this insight, forever now when crossing roads I look right at the drivers to ensure they see me even if 'not looking' because I believe the
brain cant help but 'find the face'.

Anyways, a quick GoogleFU for some relevant data about the sexual component only gave me this bit that I could copy-paste (there was some stuff in
some Google Books):

A man's physical response to porn—faster heart rate, increased bloodflow, erection—is preceded by a deeper neurological process, which
scientists have attempted to capture through brain scans. The results have varied widely. "There are so many moving parts in this equation," says
William Struthers, Ph.D., a biopsychologist and the author of Wired for Intimacy. "How old is the man? Is he involved in a sexual relationship? Is he
regularly masturbating? People think sex is always the same. It's not. You look at food very differently when you're hungry compared with when you've
just finished a meal."

Even so, a few broad themes have consistently emerged. First is the cognitive component—visual processing, attention, and reward. "Pornographic
images seem to activate a man's visual system in a manner that goes beyond just looking at trees or even people," says Struthers. "It's almost like a
high-definition signal compared with a standard signal." Once this signal—Tori Black in the nude, say—hits the male antenna, the mesolimbic
(reward) system kicks in, producing a rush of feel-good dopamine.

This can reinforce the behavior much in the same way that drugs like coc aine would—which is perhaps the most widely exploited argument against
porn. "Guys freak out when they think porn might be 'rewiring' their brains," says Struthers. "The reality is, our brains are regularly being
'rewired'—we wouldn't learn anything otherwise." Perhaps more troublesome is what occurs after that pleasurable surge: the activation of brain
regions tied to motivation, which drives men to seek sexual release. www.menshealth.com...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.