Whole-heartedly agree. I refuse to give up on Locker, plus I just really don't like any of the QB's in this class except for (and this may sound sacrilegious) Tim Tebow, but I wouldn't take him until the third or fourth round, so thats where I think the value of this class lies.

Tebow is the only one I see developing into anything and that's not because of where he is at right now, but what I see from him off the field in his work ethic & his willingness to take coaching to get better. That combined with the "it" factor that he clearly has more of than most QB's in football right now, is why I like him down the road as a QB.

Just a C+ ? I know you want Locker but that 1st round alone would make Seattle 10x better then they are right now and make the future look pretty bright honestly. Even if it's not who you prefer that's a pretty nice haul for the top 3 picks.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott Wright

I guarantee that if someone picks Cam Newton in the Top 5 they will regret it.

Just a C+ ? I know you want Locker but that 1st round alone would make Seattle 10x better then they are right now and make the future look pretty bright honestly. Even if it's not who you prefer that's a pretty nice haul for the top 3 picks.

Spiller might make the seahawks a lot better than they are now, but Clausen will not play next year if they take him unless Hasselbeck gets hurt again. Not taking into account my personal preference, I just don't see Clausen being drafted by the Hawks AT 6. Now if he or Bradford is there at 14 (incredibly likely that at least one of them will be), it'd be hard to justify passing on him. However, this is not a case of Clausen being undervalued like Matt Ryan a couple of years ago. This is a case of a guy being overvalued to the point of being a top 10 pick in a draft that is weak at the QB position, with little to seperate the 2nd rounders from the 5th rounders.

Personally, I don't think Bradford or Clausen are top 10 picks, but one of them will go in the top 10 because a team will fall in love with their intangibles (likely Bradford). Hopefully that team isn't Seattle and they take a player who will make an immediate impact like an Okung or even a Berry.

Just a C+ ? I know you want Locker but that 1st round alone would make Seattle 10x better then they are right now and make the future look pretty bright honestly. Even if it's not who you prefer that's a pretty nice haul for the top 3 picks.

I dont think Charles Brown is the answer at tackle no matter where he is taken. Maybe a little harsh with the C+ so if we grade it on a curve how does B sound?