File Format:

Adobe Reader

Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land
Analysis Paper Based on the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceTrends in Hunting on Public and Private Land
Analysis Paper Based on the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
The conclusions in this analysis paper are the author’s and do not represent official positions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The author thanks Sylvia Cabrera and Richard Aiken for valuable input into this paper.
July 2011
Anna Harris U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs Division of Policy and Programs Arlington, VAContents
Hunting on Public and Private Land......................................................................1
Hunting Trends on Public and Private Land........................................................2
Big Game Hunting Trends on Public and Private Land......................................2
Small Game Hunting Trends on Public and Private Land..................................4
Other Animal Hunters Trends on Public and Private Land ..............................5
Public Access Programs..........................................................................................6
Conclusion.................................................................................................................7
References.................................................................................................................7
Tables and Figures
Table 1. 1991-2006 Hunting on Public and Private Land.....................................2
Table 2. 1991-2006 Big Game Hunting on Public and Private Land..................3
Table 3. 1991-2006 Small Game Hunting on Public and Private Land...............4
Table 4. 1991-2006 Migratory Bird Hunting on Public and Private Land........4
Table 5. 1991-2006 Other Animal Hunting on Public and Private Land............5
Figure 1. People Hunting on Public and Private Lands......................................1
Figure 2. Percent of Big Game hunting on public land only................................3
Figure 3. Percent of Big Game hunting on private land only..............................3
Hunting on Public and Private Land
Hunting is a popular wildlife recreational activity for millions of Americans. It is a heritage passed down from generation to generation and is an important part of the American fabric of life and rural culture. There is a critical link between hunting and wildlife conservation as sportspersons in the U.S. have created one of the most successful wildlife conservation programs in the world.1 However, this lifestyle is showing signs of stress as evidenced by waning hunting license sales. Government agencies and the private sector must assure that wildlife habitat is protected and restored and hunters continue to have adequate access to areas to hunt.
In 2006, 12.5 million hunters hunted on public land, private land, or both in the U.S. More than 80% of hunters accessed private land and 39% used public land to hunt on. Some hunters relied exclusively on public land (1.9 million) while others used private land only (7.2 million). Another 3 million hunters hunted on both public and private land.
Public lands are defined as land owned by local government (such as county parks), State governments (such as State parks and wildlife management areas), or federal governments (such as National Forests and Wildlife Refuges). Private lands include land owned by a private individual, groups of individuals or nongovernmental organizations.
1 The North American Wildlife Conservation Model, unmatched anywhere else in the world, has two basic principles: 1) that fish and wildlife belong to all North American citizens and 2) they are to be managed in such a way that their populations will be forever sustained.
Hunters spent over 219 million days afield, with the majority of hunting occurring on private land. During 2006, 4.9 million hunters used public land on 54 million days, representing 25% of all hunting days. The other 75% of all hunting days were spent on private land (164 million days).
Information on the trends of hunting on private and public land is useful to public land managers in the justification of management goals and to private landowners who are considering alternative income opportunities by allowing hunting access to their land. This report uses information from the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. The National Survey has been conducted about every five years since 1955 and quantifies the U.S. population (16 years old and older) who participated in these outdoor recreational activities. Due to methodological changes in 1991, survey results prior to 1991 are not comparable.
Figure 1. People Hunting on Public and Private Lands
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 1Hunting Trends on Public
and Private Land
The trend in hunting overall from 1996 to 2006 saw a 10% decline in participation. However, those who hunted only on private land had no statistically significant decline in participation. Conversely, hunting on public land saw a 19% decline from 1996 to 2006.
The biggest decrease occurred for hunters using both public and private land (28% decline during this time period). Does this imply hunters no longer have the time or money to hunt on both public and private land and therefore must choose between the two? If so, private land apparently is the more preferred. Not only were there less hunters on public land but they also spent much less time hunting there.
Days afield on public land dropped 29% from 1996 to 2006. Days spent hunting on private land also decreased but by less than 20%. These results are likely evidence of the success efforts have had to increase public access to private land.
How does public and private land use vary among the different types of hunting? The National Survey breaks hunting down into four major categories: Big Game, Small Game, Migratory Bird, and Other Animals which will be referred to in the following sections.
Table 1. 1991-2006 Hunting on Public and Private Land2
2 The 95% level of confidence was used when calculating significance of differences.
2 Trends in Hunting on Public and Private LandBig game hunting was the most popular type of hunting. An estimated 10.7 million hunters over the age of 15 pursued big game in 2006. Big game is defined as deer, elk, bear, wild turkey, and other big game such as moose. 35% of big game hunters pursued big game on public land for 37 million days. 80% of big game hunters spent 120 million days pursuing big game on private land in 2006. Over 2 million hunters used both public and private land to hunt big game.
The number of big game hunters remained stable from 1996 to 2006. The same was true for big game hunters using private land. During this time period big game hunting participation on public land declined by 23%.
Days afield for big game hunting underwent a slight increase, though it was not statistically significant. Surprisingly, the number of days spent hunting big game on public land did not change and the days spent hunting big game on private land increased by 14% from 1996 to 2006. This is great news for states that have sought to increase access to private land. Big game hunting has remained stable at a time when most forms of hunting have decreased; these hunters are spending more time afield on private land. Providing access to private land for hunting, especially for big game, will likely continue to keep the hunting tradition alive.
It is interesting to look at the use of public land only and private land only. In 1991, 20% of big game hunters hunted on public land only and by 2006 this percent had fallen to 16%. Hunting on private land only went the opposite way: 56% of hunters accessed only private land in 1991 and their participation increased to 61% by 2006.
Figure 2. Percent of Big Game hunting on public land only
Figure 3. Percent of Big Game hunting on private land only
Table 2. 1991-2006 Big Game Hunting on Public and Private Land
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 3
Big Game Hunting Trends on Public
and Private LandIn 2006 4.8 million small game
hunters hunted on public and private
land. Small game hunting includes
hunting for rabbit, quail, squirrel,
and other small game animals
including birds. 1.7 million hunters
(35%) pursued small game on public
land for nearly 12.5 million days.
On private land, 3.8 million small
game hunters spent 38 million days
pursuing small game. 857 thousand
small game hunters accessed both
public and private land in 2006.
Small game hunting had a 31% drop
in participation between 1996 and
2006. Refer to a report by U.S. Fish
and Wildlife survey staff for a more
detailed analysis of the trends in
small game hunting by species3.
From 1996 to 2006 small game
hunting participation on both public
and private land declined by 45%.
Unlike big game hunting, hunting
small game only on public land had
less of a decline (-26%) than hunting
only on private land (-29%). The
days hunters spent hunting for small
game declined regardless of the type
of land hunters accessed.
3 Aiken, Richard, “Trends in
Fishing and Hunting 1991-2006:
A Focus on Fishing and Hunting
by Species” December 2010 <
http://library.fws.gov/Pubs/nat-survey2006-
trends-fishing-hunting-
1991-2006-focus-on-species.pdf>
Table 3. 1991-2006 Small Game Hunting on Public and Private Land
4 Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land
Small Game Hunting on Public
and Private Land Trends
Table 4. 1991-2006 Migratory Bird Hunting on Public and Private Land
Migratory Bird Hunting on Public
and Private Land Trends
Over 2 million U.S. residents over
the age of 16 went migratory bird
hunting for 19.8 million days in
2006. Migratory birds are birds that
migrate from one region or climate
to another such as ducks, geese, and
doves. 1.7 million migratory bird
hunters accessed private land and
798 thousand hunted on public land
in 2006.
Migratory bird hunting had a 25%
decline in participation between 1996
and 2006. Migratory bird hunting
on public land saw a 29% decline
in participation while hunting on
private land had a 27% decrease in
participation.
The days spent hunting migratory
birds on public land declined by
27% and for private land there
was a 24% decline in participation.
Participation of people who used
both public and private land did not
have a significant change between
1996 and 2006. This indicates some
migratory bird hunters still value
access to both private and public
land.
Over 1.1 million hunters reported
spending 15.2 million days pursuing
other animals, such as coyotes,
groundhogs, and raccoons. 928
thousand hunters spent 12 million
days hunting on private land and 311
thousand hunters accessed public
land to hunt other animals for 2.8
million days.
Hunting for other animals saw a
decrease in participation between
1996 and 2006. On private land,
participation in this type of hunting
declined 29% from 1996 to 2006.
On the other hand, there was no
significant change in the number of
hunters who accessed public land to
hunt other animals during this time
period. However, the days spent
hunting other animals on public
land saw a 51% decrease from 1996
to 2006. The days hunters pursued
other animals on private land also
decreased during this time. There
was no significant decline in the
number of hunters who accessed
both types of land which, like
migratory birds, may imply equal
value for these two types of land for
some hunters.
Table 5. 1991-2006 Other Animal Hunting on Public and Private Land
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 5
Other Animal Hunters on Public
and Private Land Trends
Public Access Programs
Many states have created hunter access programs and private landowners deserve to be recognized for the important public benefit they provide by allowing others to use their land. Generally the state will pay a fee to the landowner, usually based on acreage and land quality, and the access to hunt is by walk-in only (Helland, 2006). These programs are designed to benefit landowners, wildlife habitat, and hunters. These programs follow a recommendation by one of the first wildlife policy committees (Leopold, 1930) that hunting at no cost on private land was not in the best interests of wildlife management and landowners should be compensated by the public for providing wildlife and recreation.
Funding sources for public access programs vary widely across states. One federal source is the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program, known as the “Open Fields” initiative. This program directs the USDA to support existing state-based programs supporting landowners who make their lands accessible for wildlife-related recreational access. The funding is from the federal government but the states continue to manage their program.
Another federal funding source is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program (i.e. Pittman-Robertson funds) generated from an 11% excise tax on sporting arms and ammunition. The Wildlife Restoration Program provides grant funds for restoration of wild birds and mammals and to acquire, develop and manage their habitats. The funds are apportioned to states for projects including access to wildlife resources.
As a result of these successful partnerships between federal and state agencies as well as private individuals, many states have been able to increase the number of acres enrolled in access programs. Some state fish and wildlife directors are placing public access to private land as a high priority for their agencies.
6 Trends in Hunting on Public and Private LandConclusion
More than 80% of hunters access private land, making it the most preferred hunting option. Overall hunting participation saw a 10% decline in participation from 1996 to 2006, yet hunting participation on private land was stable. Big game hunting was the most popular; there were no significant declines in the number of hunters on private land, while days spent on private land increased. Small game hunting saw dramatic decreases in both private and public land hunting. This was especially true for hunters who accessed both public and private land. The declines in the number of migratory bird hunters were similar for public and private land. Other animal hunters’ participation on public land remained stable between 1996 and 2006 while hunting on private land for other animals decreased. One noteworthy trend in other animal hunting was the number of days spent on public land. Between 1996 and 2006 the days other animal hunters spent on public land decreased by over 50%!
This analysis identified trends in hunting participation on private and public land. With only 5% of the U.S. population engaging in the sport, wildlife managers need new and innovative ways to create hunting opportunities. Lack of access has long been deemed a reason some hunters give up the sport. To help reverse this trend states have created walk-in and similar public access programs. Currently twenty-six states have some form of public access program for hunting, fishing, and other wildlife-related recreation (USDA FSA).
The 2011 National Survey results will be available in early 2012. Though most programs for access to private lands are relatively new, their impact may help reverse the downward trend that hunting has seen since 1991. Results from the 2011 National Survey will provide new data about the type of hunting land hunters use. Many states and nonprofits have focused on different demographics such as youths and females to spark new interest in the sport. The key to recruiting new participants is not only teaching the skills but also providing access to land for these new participants to hunt on. Collaboration between state wildlife agencies and private landowners is a crucial part of keeping the hunting tradition going for future generations.
References
Akin, Richard. 2010. Trends in Fishing and Hunting 1991-2006: A Focus on Fishing and Hunting By Species. < http://library.fws.gov/Pubs/nat-survey2006-trends-fishing-hunting-1991-2006-focus-on-species.pdf>
Helland, John. 2006. Walk-in Hunting Programs in Other States. Information Brief Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department.
Leopold, A. 1930. The American Game Policy. Transactions American Game Conference 17:284-307.
Novak, Kelly, USDA FSA. Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program. Number 10.093. Department of Agriculture. Farm Service Agency. https://www.cfda.gov/?s=program&mode=form&tab=step1&id=5d2053f1c96fec42b4ec44e2ab919133
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 7United States Department of the Interior
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
http://wsfrprograms.fws.gov
July 2011

Click tabs to swap between content that is broken into logical sections.

Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land
Analysis Paper Based on the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceTrends in Hunting on Public and Private Land
Analysis Paper Based on the 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
The conclusions in this analysis paper are the author’s and do not represent official positions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The author thanks Sylvia Cabrera and Richard Aiken for valuable input into this paper.
July 2011
Anna Harris U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs Division of Policy and Programs Arlington, VAContents
Hunting on Public and Private Land......................................................................1
Hunting Trends on Public and Private Land........................................................2
Big Game Hunting Trends on Public and Private Land......................................2
Small Game Hunting Trends on Public and Private Land..................................4
Other Animal Hunters Trends on Public and Private Land ..............................5
Public Access Programs..........................................................................................6
Conclusion.................................................................................................................7
References.................................................................................................................7
Tables and Figures
Table 1. 1991-2006 Hunting on Public and Private Land.....................................2
Table 2. 1991-2006 Big Game Hunting on Public and Private Land..................3
Table 3. 1991-2006 Small Game Hunting on Public and Private Land...............4
Table 4. 1991-2006 Migratory Bird Hunting on Public and Private Land........4
Table 5. 1991-2006 Other Animal Hunting on Public and Private Land............5
Figure 1. People Hunting on Public and Private Lands......................................1
Figure 2. Percent of Big Game hunting on public land only................................3
Figure 3. Percent of Big Game hunting on private land only..............................3
Hunting on Public and Private Land
Hunting is a popular wildlife recreational activity for millions of Americans. It is a heritage passed down from generation to generation and is an important part of the American fabric of life and rural culture. There is a critical link between hunting and wildlife conservation as sportspersons in the U.S. have created one of the most successful wildlife conservation programs in the world.1 However, this lifestyle is showing signs of stress as evidenced by waning hunting license sales. Government agencies and the private sector must assure that wildlife habitat is protected and restored and hunters continue to have adequate access to areas to hunt.
In 2006, 12.5 million hunters hunted on public land, private land, or both in the U.S. More than 80% of hunters accessed private land and 39% used public land to hunt on. Some hunters relied exclusively on public land (1.9 million) while others used private land only (7.2 million). Another 3 million hunters hunted on both public and private land.
Public lands are defined as land owned by local government (such as county parks), State governments (such as State parks and wildlife management areas), or federal governments (such as National Forests and Wildlife Refuges). Private lands include land owned by a private individual, groups of individuals or nongovernmental organizations.
1 The North American Wildlife Conservation Model, unmatched anywhere else in the world, has two basic principles: 1) that fish and wildlife belong to all North American citizens and 2) they are to be managed in such a way that their populations will be forever sustained.
Hunters spent over 219 million days afield, with the majority of hunting occurring on private land. During 2006, 4.9 million hunters used public land on 54 million days, representing 25% of all hunting days. The other 75% of all hunting days were spent on private land (164 million days).
Information on the trends of hunting on private and public land is useful to public land managers in the justification of management goals and to private landowners who are considering alternative income opportunities by allowing hunting access to their land. This report uses information from the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. The National Survey has been conducted about every five years since 1955 and quantifies the U.S. population (16 years old and older) who participated in these outdoor recreational activities. Due to methodological changes in 1991, survey results prior to 1991 are not comparable.
Figure 1. People Hunting on Public and Private Lands
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 1Hunting Trends on Public
and Private Land
The trend in hunting overall from 1996 to 2006 saw a 10% decline in participation. However, those who hunted only on private land had no statistically significant decline in participation. Conversely, hunting on public land saw a 19% decline from 1996 to 2006.
The biggest decrease occurred for hunters using both public and private land (28% decline during this time period). Does this imply hunters no longer have the time or money to hunt on both public and private land and therefore must choose between the two? If so, private land apparently is the more preferred. Not only were there less hunters on public land but they also spent much less time hunting there.
Days afield on public land dropped 29% from 1996 to 2006. Days spent hunting on private land also decreased but by less than 20%. These results are likely evidence of the success efforts have had to increase public access to private land.
How does public and private land use vary among the different types of hunting? The National Survey breaks hunting down into four major categories: Big Game, Small Game, Migratory Bird, and Other Animals which will be referred to in the following sections.
Table 1. 1991-2006 Hunting on Public and Private Land2
2 The 95% level of confidence was used when calculating significance of differences.
2 Trends in Hunting on Public and Private LandBig game hunting was the most popular type of hunting. An estimated 10.7 million hunters over the age of 15 pursued big game in 2006. Big game is defined as deer, elk, bear, wild turkey, and other big game such as moose. 35% of big game hunters pursued big game on public land for 37 million days. 80% of big game hunters spent 120 million days pursuing big game on private land in 2006. Over 2 million hunters used both public and private land to hunt big game.
The number of big game hunters remained stable from 1996 to 2006. The same was true for big game hunters using private land. During this time period big game hunting participation on public land declined by 23%.
Days afield for big game hunting underwent a slight increase, though it was not statistically significant. Surprisingly, the number of days spent hunting big game on public land did not change and the days spent hunting big game on private land increased by 14% from 1996 to 2006. This is great news for states that have sought to increase access to private land. Big game hunting has remained stable at a time when most forms of hunting have decreased; these hunters are spending more time afield on private land. Providing access to private land for hunting, especially for big game, will likely continue to keep the hunting tradition alive.
It is interesting to look at the use of public land only and private land only. In 1991, 20% of big game hunters hunted on public land only and by 2006 this percent had fallen to 16%. Hunting on private land only went the opposite way: 56% of hunters accessed only private land in 1991 and their participation increased to 61% by 2006.
Figure 2. Percent of Big Game hunting on public land only
Figure 3. Percent of Big Game hunting on private land only
Table 2. 1991-2006 Big Game Hunting on Public and Private Land
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 3
Big Game Hunting Trends on Public
and Private LandIn 2006 4.8 million small game
hunters hunted on public and private
land. Small game hunting includes
hunting for rabbit, quail, squirrel,
and other small game animals
including birds. 1.7 million hunters
(35%) pursued small game on public
land for nearly 12.5 million days.
On private land, 3.8 million small
game hunters spent 38 million days
pursuing small game. 857 thousand
small game hunters accessed both
public and private land in 2006.
Small game hunting had a 31% drop
in participation between 1996 and
2006. Refer to a report by U.S. Fish
and Wildlife survey staff for a more
detailed analysis of the trends in
small game hunting by species3.
From 1996 to 2006 small game
hunting participation on both public
and private land declined by 45%.
Unlike big game hunting, hunting
small game only on public land had
less of a decline (-26%) than hunting
only on private land (-29%). The
days hunters spent hunting for small
game declined regardless of the type
of land hunters accessed.
3 Aiken, Richard, “Trends in
Fishing and Hunting 1991-2006:
A Focus on Fishing and Hunting
by Species” December 2010 <
http://library.fws.gov/Pubs/nat-survey2006-
trends-fishing-hunting-
1991-2006-focus-on-species.pdf>
Table 3. 1991-2006 Small Game Hunting on Public and Private Land
4 Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land
Small Game Hunting on Public
and Private Land Trends
Table 4. 1991-2006 Migratory Bird Hunting on Public and Private Land
Migratory Bird Hunting on Public
and Private Land Trends
Over 2 million U.S. residents over
the age of 16 went migratory bird
hunting for 19.8 million days in
2006. Migratory birds are birds that
migrate from one region or climate
to another such as ducks, geese, and
doves. 1.7 million migratory bird
hunters accessed private land and
798 thousand hunted on public land
in 2006.
Migratory bird hunting had a 25%
decline in participation between 1996
and 2006. Migratory bird hunting
on public land saw a 29% decline
in participation while hunting on
private land had a 27% decrease in
participation.
The days spent hunting migratory
birds on public land declined by
27% and for private land there
was a 24% decline in participation.
Participation of people who used
both public and private land did not
have a significant change between
1996 and 2006. This indicates some
migratory bird hunters still value
access to both private and public
land.
Over 1.1 million hunters reported
spending 15.2 million days pursuing
other animals, such as coyotes,
groundhogs, and raccoons. 928
thousand hunters spent 12 million
days hunting on private land and 311
thousand hunters accessed public
land to hunt other animals for 2.8
million days.
Hunting for other animals saw a
decrease in participation between
1996 and 2006. On private land,
participation in this type of hunting
declined 29% from 1996 to 2006.
On the other hand, there was no
significant change in the number of
hunters who accessed public land to
hunt other animals during this time
period. However, the days spent
hunting other animals on public
land saw a 51% decrease from 1996
to 2006. The days hunters pursued
other animals on private land also
decreased during this time. There
was no significant decline in the
number of hunters who accessed
both types of land which, like
migratory birds, may imply equal
value for these two types of land for
some hunters.
Table 5. 1991-2006 Other Animal Hunting on Public and Private Land
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 5
Other Animal Hunters on Public
and Private Land Trends
Public Access Programs
Many states have created hunter access programs and private landowners deserve to be recognized for the important public benefit they provide by allowing others to use their land. Generally the state will pay a fee to the landowner, usually based on acreage and land quality, and the access to hunt is by walk-in only (Helland, 2006). These programs are designed to benefit landowners, wildlife habitat, and hunters. These programs follow a recommendation by one of the first wildlife policy committees (Leopold, 1930) that hunting at no cost on private land was not in the best interests of wildlife management and landowners should be compensated by the public for providing wildlife and recreation.
Funding sources for public access programs vary widely across states. One federal source is the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program, known as the “Open Fields” initiative. This program directs the USDA to support existing state-based programs supporting landowners who make their lands accessible for wildlife-related recreational access. The funding is from the federal government but the states continue to manage their program.
Another federal funding source is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program (i.e. Pittman-Robertson funds) generated from an 11% excise tax on sporting arms and ammunition. The Wildlife Restoration Program provides grant funds for restoration of wild birds and mammals and to acquire, develop and manage their habitats. The funds are apportioned to states for projects including access to wildlife resources.
As a result of these successful partnerships between federal and state agencies as well as private individuals, many states have been able to increase the number of acres enrolled in access programs. Some state fish and wildlife directors are placing public access to private land as a high priority for their agencies.
6 Trends in Hunting on Public and Private LandConclusion
More than 80% of hunters access private land, making it the most preferred hunting option. Overall hunting participation saw a 10% decline in participation from 1996 to 2006, yet hunting participation on private land was stable. Big game hunting was the most popular; there were no significant declines in the number of hunters on private land, while days spent on private land increased. Small game hunting saw dramatic decreases in both private and public land hunting. This was especially true for hunters who accessed both public and private land. The declines in the number of migratory bird hunters were similar for public and private land. Other animal hunters’ participation on public land remained stable between 1996 and 2006 while hunting on private land for other animals decreased. One noteworthy trend in other animal hunting was the number of days spent on public land. Between 1996 and 2006 the days other animal hunters spent on public land decreased by over 50%!
This analysis identified trends in hunting participation on private and public land. With only 5% of the U.S. population engaging in the sport, wildlife managers need new and innovative ways to create hunting opportunities. Lack of access has long been deemed a reason some hunters give up the sport. To help reverse this trend states have created walk-in and similar public access programs. Currently twenty-six states have some form of public access program for hunting, fishing, and other wildlife-related recreation (USDA FSA).
The 2011 National Survey results will be available in early 2012. Though most programs for access to private lands are relatively new, their impact may help reverse the downward trend that hunting has seen since 1991. Results from the 2011 National Survey will provide new data about the type of hunting land hunters use. Many states and nonprofits have focused on different demographics such as youths and females to spark new interest in the sport. The key to recruiting new participants is not only teaching the skills but also providing access to land for these new participants to hunt on. Collaboration between state wildlife agencies and private landowners is a crucial part of keeping the hunting tradition going for future generations.
References
Akin, Richard. 2010. Trends in Fishing and Hunting 1991-2006: A Focus on Fishing and Hunting By Species. < http://library.fws.gov/Pubs/nat-survey2006-trends-fishing-hunting-1991-2006-focus-on-species.pdf>
Helland, John. 2006. Walk-in Hunting Programs in Other States. Information Brief Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department.
Leopold, A. 1930. The American Game Policy. Transactions American Game Conference 17:284-307.
Novak, Kelly, USDA FSA. Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program. Number 10.093. Department of Agriculture. Farm Service Agency. https://www.cfda.gov/?s=program&mode=form&tab=step1&id=5d2053f1c96fec42b4ec44e2ab919133
Trends in Hunting on Public and Private Land 7United States Department of the Interior
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
http://wsfrprograms.fws.gov
July 2011