A Reply and Challenge to Ben Gadd

Back in December, Ben Gadd responded to the shock expressed by a mutual friend about my expulsion from the Jasper Environmental Associaton (JEA). A small sample from Ben:

Holocaust denial is a federal offense in Canada, a serious crime. It’s hate speech, not free speech. That’s because it’s a particularly virulent lie promulgated by anti-Semites. And anti-Semitism, as we all know, has resulted in the hate-sparked deaths of millions of people over many hundreds of years. Hate crimes of all sorts occur in Canada, and they are not tolerated, especially this one. Nor is the public expression of the hateful beliefs that fuel such crimes…

The following letter by Rocky Notnes seemed like a natural and logical reaction to a situation by a person who apparently is not affected by all the control words which are meant to elicit a certain programmed response. He penned this letter after learning that I had been expelled from the JEA.

December 17, 2016 Dear JEA members This is Rocky Notnes from the Entrance ranch near Hinton. Some of you will know me through the Alberta Environmental Network over the past 30 or so years. Some, if not all of you probably also know that I wrote a letter to the Jasper newspapers, which was published in both, defending Monika Schaefer’s right to free speech re the holocaust. So my stand will not be news to you. When I learned that she was expelled from JEA for her views as well as almost everything else I was quite surprised and disappointed. It seems like JEA have jumped on the anti-Monika bandwagon with most of the people in Jasper in what seems to have become a stampede. It is as if people are trying to distance themselves as if they think they are guilty by virtue of just knowing her. I have known Monika before and after and I do not see her having changed, other than speaking out on an issue that obviously is taboo! While I am not a “holocaust denier” as it is called now, I find your, and others in Jasper, reaction appalling. It seems to me that if members of the JEA felt so strongly about it they could have issued a statement that they do not support Monika in her views. That’s all. But this is democracy “in reaction”, not “action”! I feel the same way about Elizabeth May and the Green Party,,, they could have issued a statement disassociating themselves from her views. But to boot somebody out for expressing a view, regardless of the topic, when she has been an upstanding member of the community all her life is, going over the top, in my view. Regards, Rocky Notnes

The following day this rather patronizing diatribe came from Ben Gadd:

Thanks for writing to all of us, Rocky. I didn’t think I’d ever disagree with you about anything, but in Monika’s case I have to. Hers is not a free-speech issue. Here’s why. Holocaust denial is a federal offense in Canada, a serious crime. It’s hate speech, not free speech. That’s because it’s a particularly virulent lie promulgated by anti-Semites. And anti-Semitism, as we all know, has resulted in the hate-sparked deaths of millions of people over many hundreds of years. Hate crimes of all sorts occur in Canada, and they are not tolerated, especially this one. Nor is the public expression of the hateful beliefs that fuel such crimes. If Monika had kept her views to herself, as many anti-Semites do, none of this would have come up. But she hasn’t. In 2013, out of the blue, she sent me a “truther” video blaming the 9/11 attacks on the “Zionists,” i.e. the Jews. Like other fake news on the Internet, this is a complete fabrication. Go to http://www.debunking911.com for a detailed analysis. Monika approached other JEA members, too. We didn’t push her away at that point. Some of us took the time to reason with her and direct her to factual sources. I told her that such conspiracy theories are hazardous. They inevitably lead to hatred of whoever is accused of directing the conspiracy. I thought that Monika — the Monika we used to know and love — would realize the depth and danger of the rabbit hole she was going down and quickly reverse her direction. But she rejected such advice and kept going, deeper and deeper, until now she seems to have reached the bottom, a scary place shared by the likes of Ernst Zündel and James Keegstra (and, alas, Monika’s own brother Alfred). At that point I pushed her away. As has the JEA. The JEA is a group of like-minded, high-minded folks. We don’t hate anyone. We don’t hate Monika. Rather, our group works together to watch over Jasper National Park and alert the world to activities we see as harmful to this place we love. For that job the organization needs the public on side. And they are. As the polls show, Canadians believe what environmental groups such as the JEA have to say about the value of the park and how it needs to be protected, while Canadians do not buy the commercially-tainted stuff that park exploiters try to sell everyone in their self-promotional ad campaigns. Given the facts, which is what the JEA provides, it’s easy for people to tell the difference between the JEA’s clear and honest position of integrity and some corporation’s clever attempt to get what it wants. So maintaining our integrity is crucial to the JEA. Opening our membership to vocal haters of any sort, who have accepted obvious lies and seek to spread them, would seriously damage that integrity. Not only that, any society incorporated in Alberta must exist for a “benevolent, philanthropic, charitable, provident, scientific, artistic, literary, social, educational, agricultural, sporting or other useful purpose” [Societies Act, section 3(1)]. It goes without saying that (a) members should be in agreement with this statement and the goals of the society, (b) that spreading hatred is not included in the statement or in the JEA’s goals, and (c) that anyone doing so cannot be a member. Monika can go on and on about how she’s the one with integrity, how she’s the victim and those organizations that have rejected her are the haters, but these are just tactics. They are used all the time by people held to account for bad behavior. A good definition of integrity is “the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.” (Just Google the word.) A person of integrity doesn’t try to convince others that dark-skinned people, for example (substitute indigenous people or Muslims or Jews, etc.) are evil and/or subhuman and should be discriminated against. Such beliefs are in themselves evil, because they are lies. These are not honest beliefs. These are falsehoods so easily exposed that they can be accepted only by the willing suspension of disbelief. You have to want to believe them, despite all the evidence. And there goes your integrity. Worse, hateful beliefs provide excuses to hurt people. Bigoted mistreatment of minorities occurs all the time, even in Canada, and I’m sure that you, as I, abhor it. Anyone engaged in it is not acting with integrity. And here’s what really hurts me. I think that Monika — pleasant, friendly Monika, the likeable Jasper violinist — is being used by her new anti-Semitic associates to give Holocaust denial a fresh face. They are turning her into something she’s basically not. I hope that she awakens one morning to the truth about this (the real truth, not the “truther” truth) and disavows both the intellectual poison she has been fed and the whole crowd purveying it. I hope this occurs soon, before it brings her further mental and emotional injury and before the fully committed haters who are manipulating her succeed in recruiting others through her. If Monika comes to her senses, all she has to do to extricate herself from this mess is to publicly disavow it, even if she’s sitting in prison for breaking the law, which might be the case. She needs to tell everyone that she was misled, that she was wrong, and that she is sorry for the hateful things she has said. If this happens, I have no doubt that she will mean it, and I will forgive her. I think we would all forgive her. We’d give her a hug and welcome her back to the real world. Believing in Monika and anticipating that she will turn her life around, — Ben

My Open Letter to Ben Gadd and the Jasper Environmental Association, January 5 2017 ~ by Monika Schaefer

Happy New Year to you all! Let us hope that this will be the year during which the light of truth becomes ever brighter.

Ben you seem intent on seeing me imprisoned. Let me assure you, that if it should come to that (which I doubt), I would rather be in jail with a free mind, than be a mind-controlled Pavlovian conditioned slave in the Orwellian world of double-speak where peace is war and black is white.

Truth is Hate to those who Hate the Truth.

CIA Director William Casey said in February 1981 in a staff meeting with newly elected President Ronald Reagan, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

Thank you very much Ben for bringing up 9/11 in your letter. Most people around the world know that was a false flag event and that controlled demolition brought down the three towers. You claim I sent you a video blaming 9/11 on Zionists, therefore anti-Semitic. In fact I gave you the DVD called “Experts Speak Out” by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Their hallmark is that they investigate the physical aspects of what happened on 9/11, never the “who-done-it”. You reveal your prejudice on that story by implying that ae911truth.org is an anti-Semitic organization. How exactly does their scientific analysis of the chemistry, the architecture, the physics, the thermodynamics etc., add up to anti-Semitism? Who planted that meme into your head?

True, 9/11 was in fact a Zionist operation, therefore the powers-that-be preemptively try to steer people in another direction by using weaponized words such as “anti-Semitic” against anyone who dares question the official narrative.

Would you call me anti-Semitic for pointing out that Israel attacked the USS Liberty in 1967, killing 34 American Servicemen and injuring many more, and tried to blame Egypt? Had they succeeded in sinking the ship, they might have got away with the deception of blaming another country. Blaming a third party for misdeeds is what is called false flag and Israel is very good at it. I would venture a guess that some people in the JEA have never heard of the USS Liberty. That unfortunate “incident” was suppressed by the Johnston administration, and the mainstream media dutifully fell into line.

Is it anti-Semitic to point out these well-documented facts? “Anti-Semitic” is just a Weaponized Control Trigger word which is meant to shut down rational thought and discussion. In fact, former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni agrees with my assessment of that. She calls it a trick, “we always use it…”

The Israeli Mossad motto is “By way of Deception, thou shalt make War”. Wouldn’t it be more noble to have a motto about standing up for Truth and Justice and Peace? By way of deception — think about that word!

Formerly Jewish Israeli Gilad Atzmon puts it this way: Jewish power is the ability to silence criticism of Jewish Power.

Regarding WW2 history, nobody has been able to answer my question about the basic maths. In Auschwitz alone, the official death count has dropped by almost 3 million, yet the mythical 6 million number remains the same. In January 1933, the Jewish population of Germany was approximately 522,000. More than half emigrated during the following 6 years. It is difficult to imagine how 6 million could have been herded into gas chambers, even when Jewish populations from surrounding countries are taken into account. The numbers simply don’t add up. And how could there have been so many “survivors”, who then collected reparation money, and still collect reparations to this day, if 6 million were killed? And how is it that pre- and post-war population figures indicate no reduction in Jewish numbers – was there a giant unprecedented baby boom the likes of which has never been seen before or since?http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=85432

Are you familiar with the Doctrine of Judicial Notice? This doctrine allows courts to recognize as “fact” matters that are “common knowledge”. This doctrine has been used in the courts to avoid actual evidence which might run contrary to the victor’s version and Hollywood depiction of the so-called Jewish Holocaust. Evidence is not required because “The Holocaust” is self-evident. How is that for circular logic? Articles 19 and 21 of the Nuremberg trials stated as much, and Justice Thomas T. Johnson used the doctrine of judicial notice in the case by Mel Mermelstein against the Institute for Historical Review in 1981.

See this article for a thorough discussion of the Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust. You might choose to dismiss it as it comes from the Institute for Historical Review, but keep in mind the perverse logic of the doctrine which I explained in the previous paragraph. It is a 2-part article, highly footnoted, and very educational.http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_webera.html

To all the people who have actively spurned me, actively expelled me from organizations, actively ostracized me (you figure prominently in the JEA strangely enough), it is especially important for you to spend a little bit of time looking into these matters. Even just reading the one article from the IHR to which I supplied the link above, should give you pause to consider that it might not be me who is so 100% wildly wrong on these very important matters. If you react with the common “I refuse to debate this and I refuse to look at this”, how can you be so sure you are 100% right?

Meanwhile you go along with the casting of stones. Are you afraid to look? Do you actually believe I have lost my sanity, causing me to risk all – and to what end? Or might it occur to you in a tiny corner of your brain and heart and soul that just maybe, just maybe, there is another story here, one which is being viciously suppressed.

Ben Gadd, you of all people surprise me the most. The American draft dodger from the Vietnam era, the environmental guru, you always stood up for what you believed in. You always told us: question everything, don’t trust authority, governments lie to us. In that light, your outright dismissal and condemnation of me make absolutely no sense to me.

Your behaviour only makes sense if you were Sayanim. If that is the case, everything makes sense!

The fact that this one event in our history is untouchable should be enough to raise serious questions about it. Why are we not allowed to question and investigate this one event? Might it be because there is something to hide? Might it also be due to a particular group of people benefitting from it?

Voltaire said, “To learn who rules over you, simply ask who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Finally, to answer the question that some have asked me: “To what end Monika?” A world of lies and deceptions is a world of war and turmoil. That is not the world I want to sit idle in and leave it as such for our children and grandchildren. I desire a world of Peace, Light, Love and Beauty. That comes only through charting our course through the world with a map based on Truth.

Monika Schaefer

Some further thoughts, …

Ben Gadd’s letter gave me the opportunity to write my response (above). I provided many links and many documented facts and I asked a few basic questions. None of that was addressed in this following response from Ben which came the very next day. It is interesting to note that instead of answering any questions or addressing any of the issues at hand, Ben uses language that is intended to so intimidate the mind-softened people to not even dare consider using their own brain. He continues to engage in name-calling and to use plenty of Weaponized Control Trigger words.

January 6th, 2017 from Ben:Monika’s torrent of words leads to her saying this of me:“Your behaviour only makes sense if you were Sayanim. If that is the case, everything makes sense!”I had to look up “Sayanim.” It’s Hebrew for “assistants,” and it refers to Jews living outside Israel who assist the Mossad. More generally, it means Israeli secret agents.Yikes! I’ve been exposed. (But it does remind to me go give my handler a ring. My cheque is late this month.)All kidding aside, I am not now, nor have I ever been anyone’s secret agent for anything. Monika is just playing the ultimate card in the conspiracy theorist’s deck. Anyone who opposes the theory is part of the conspiracy.This is paranoid-delusional, I know, but it’s also a bit scary. Anti-Semites can be quite nasty. They have their enemies list, and if I wasn’t on it already I am now. Should the Truthers come to power — a growing possibility in the Age of Trump — I can expect them to come after me.That’s how hate speech works. The haters find their targets, denounce them and wait for the mob to do the rest.After I sent that long reply to Rocky back on December 18th, I noted a long gap in new postings to Monika’s website. (Her anti-Semitic “freespeechmonika.wordpress.com” website, not her benign “monikaschaefer.ca” website.) Perhaps she was just taking some time off from her campaign, but I was hoping that she had withdrawn for some reflection on where all this was taking her. I was really hoping that the next posting would be a heartfelt retraction of the venemous stuff she had been saying.Alas, not to be. At the end of the year Monika was back, attacking Elizabeth May again as some sort of Zionist puppet and telling us that climate change is caused by you-know-who spreading chemicals through the sky in the form of passenger-jet contrails. This is loonie stuff, but loads of unhappy, gullible people looking for someone to blame their troubles on believe it. Intelligent, articulate and reasonable-sounding Monika is clearly a rising star in their world. I haven’t seen a Donate button on her site, but perhaps that will be next.Whatever, I’m done with this. Rocky, I’ve said my piece. Monika, for the last time, please, pretty-please, realize that the road you are on leads to Holocaust II.Sincerely, and ‘bye for now,— Ben

Ben is right in a way, in that I should have been clearer and simply said that his behaviour is like someone who is a Sayan and not imply (with my word if..) that he might actually be a real live Sayan. He says he is not, so there you have it.

For this he calls me “paranoid-delusional”, while in the next breath, engages in his own “paranoid-delusional” thoughts by saying, … “Anti-Semites can be quite nasty. They have their enemies list, and if I wasn’t on it already I am now. Should the Truthers come to power — a growing possibility in the Age of Trump — I can expect them to come after me.”

Ben, take a big breath, calm down and don’t worry your little PC heart that the knock on the door at 2 or 3 pm is the new Gestapo. (PC does not stand for Progressive Conservative like here in Canada, so just in case you have to look it up – its Politically Correct!) It will just be your neighbour wanting to borrow a cup of sweet lies that you have accepted and stored in abundance. Sweet comfortable lies that I have now thrown in the trash.

Ben then accuses me of being a “hater” and of saying “venomous” stuff. Isn’t this an ironic accusation when all I’m saying with regard to the “Holocaust” is that the German people were NOT guilty of that crime and there is overwhelming evidence to support that position? Now with 9/11, I am accusing organised jewry of carrying out that crime. So, you see, accusations of being a “hater”, etc., cuts both ways and can be used to prevent the truth from coming out. Are the police and courts “haters” when they accuse the Mafia of crimes? Are the police and courts “haters” when they sentence revisionists to years in prison for thinking the wrong thoughts?

Finally Ben ends with this melodramatic flourish, … “Whatever, I’m done with this. Rocky, I’ve said my piece. Monika, for the last time, please, pretty-please, realize that the road you are on leads to Holocaust II.”

Besides begging the very question of “Holocaust I” that is at the heart of the issue at hand, I believe that people like Ben Gadd are unwittingly helping to create a horrifying tyranny that allows no dissent, that crushes anyone who questions what organised jewry says.

So Ben, don’t run away in “outrage”. Perhaps I am wrong, so please engage me in polite and reasoned debate on substantial issues like the “Holocaust” or 9/11.

Ben sounds like a typical Judaicized Canadian. I read a fair bit of his spew but I have almost no tolerance for such yidiocy and could only take so much. It seems if you do not buy his explanation you wear tin foil caps and live in a mad world of conspiracy theories.No, I would not last two minutes in the same room as this person.

I’m so angry that such an apparently beautiful person, Monika Schaefer, is being persecuted for espousing her beliefs as pertains the alleged holocaust, as she is absolutely right!
Having done extensive research into the subject of the “holocaust”, there is no doubt that it nothing but a grotesque hoax!

Monika, your response was brilliant.
It is infuriating what the “brainwashed” have to say in their defense. None of them have the courage to open their minds to investigate and find out how and why these lies have been indoctrinating the masses. Are they so dumb that they do not even question the laws that are brought out that in a so called Democratic Country where everyone should have the right to free speech (not only selected ones) could not question the “Holohoax” or ask for actual proof to back up that claim, and is now punished for doing so ? Are they so blind that they do not see that these laws are only created to cover up the lies, and do they not realize that “the truth fears no questions” ! What are they afraid of ? that their idiotic believes are proven to be false and that they have to wake up to the fact that these laws are only there to protect the lies that are repeated over and over again like a mantra. The ones forcing the Government to impose such laws must be petrified that by exposing the lies would put an end to the power they have over all of us ? Do these “sheep” not realize that the “big bad Wolf” that is controlling our world is also destroying it and all of our values and rights? We should pity these brainwashed sheep, they must all have been subjected to subliminal mind control and have lost their ability to think for themselves. I guess the “brainwashed” have also never looked up what a “Semite” is
which blows the claim of being an “Anti-Semite” right out of the window. So on my final note to the “brainwashed”; we are asking for equal rights. We resent the “Anti-German” propaganda and therefore we will make use of the old Jewish principal “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. WE INSIST TO HAVE CLAIM TO OUR EQUAL RIGHTS !

I once made a blog comment to someone who was researching Edward Bernay’s that I’ll share with you.

A comment from whodareswings to Peter Schaenk, 2008.05.20.

QUOTE During the war Hollywood screen writer Ben Hecht and Irgun operative Hillel Kook (aka Peter Bergson) cook up grisly holocaust propaganda for American mass consumption in magazines like the Reader’s Digest. Using Freudian based mind control techniques, first put into play by Edward “The Father of Spin” Bernays, the “Bergson Boys” inoculate the English speaking world with the sacred 6,000,000 number before the war ends and the camps are liberated. Bernays is the wildly successful nephew of Sigmund Freud and the man who introduced Freudianism to the USA. Like Bernard Baruch, he is a “king maker” and personal friend of presidents Wilson, Hoover and Roosevelt with whom he’s consulted and globe trotted. Joseph Goebbles acknowledges his debt to Bernays in his diaries.

The Bergson Boys” was a Zionist cell working out of Washington DC with access to inner circles of media power and politics. “Having energized politicians, gangsters, Hollywood moguls, and ultra- Orthodox rabbis, the handful of young men taught other Zionist and American-Jewish groups not only how the media was the message but how it could and should be used. A guiding force behind the creation of the War Refugee Board, the group served as a beacon for contemporary Zionist militancy while ultimately laying the groundwork for other organizations to utilize the media in future political campaigns”:

During and after the war master Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenberg and the Anti-Fascist League (Soviet Jewish writers later executed after show trials), crunch the numbers of Jewish losses and population transfers and gin up the general extent of depredations against Jews in East Europe. Commissars and partisans (a disproportionate number of which were Jewish) had been severely dealt with on the Eastern Front by the defeated and collectively demonized Germans. Their treatment was harsh, but Ehrenberg and co. insure that history will make it appear even harsher.

Immediately after VE Day (but also throughout the war) “The Ritchie Boys,” (up to 10,000 mostly Jewish German speaking refugees trained in interrogation and psycholocal warfare at Fort Ritchie in Maryland) are sent into Allied occupied Europe to interrogate high ranking Nazi POWs and spread disinformation. This is a chapter in US army intelligence history that remains curiously obscure. Less than a dozen out of all the Ritchey Boys have been identified. They have been put forward as avuncular reluctant heroes not spies and torturers. All the ones we know of are Jews: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritchie_Boys

In l944 Raphael Lemkin, overseeing a team collating data on German atrocities for the WJC (World Jewish Congress) and The Carnegie Foundation in New York almost inadvertently comes up with the concept of “genocide,” a word he invents and introduces to the lexicon in his book AXIS RULE IN OCCUPIED EUROPE. The book is not about genocide per se, and Lemkin doesn’t quite realize what he’s stumbled onto until…

Col. Murray C. Bernays (the brother-in-law of Edward L. Bernays) latches onto Lemkin’s new word “genocide” and tailors the Nuremburg Trials around the idea of collective Nazi guilt and “crimes against humanity.” The latter is the Lemkin based forerunner to the UN Genocide Conventions, which will come later. Genocide isn’t the issue at Nuremburg, but “crimes against humanity” is the legal gambit Bernays uses to hold all Nazis collectively responsible for starting WWII. Using this corkscrew logic, eventually three generations of Germans are held responsible for the holocaust. Americans and ultimately all Christendom, starting with Pope Pius XII, get blamed, too, and Jews born after l945 in Brooklyn become “second generation survivors.”

In his l958 book THE WORLD CONQUERORS refugee Hungarian playwright, poet and journalist Louis Marschalko, who covered the Nuremburg Trial, writes: “Of the 3000 persons on the trial staff, 2400 were Jews. Many of them wore uniforms to which they had no entitlement.”Marschalko, a nationalist, surveyed the worldwide advance of Communism from a decidedly Catholic perspective. The author’s argument is that Communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same transnational force.Prof. Joel Hayward disagrees-“On page 44 I described Louis Marschalko’s claims that Jews fabricated their Holocaust suffering as “unscholarly … weak, racist arguments”. Two pages later I described them as “nonsense”. A further two pages later I called the same views “too polemical and biased against Jews”. On page 54 I bluntly wrote that, to state that Jewish frauds “have occurred on a ‘horrendous scale’ [as one particularly nasty writer said]
and as the result of a Jewish conspiracy to defraud the German government, is preposterous and totally insupportable.” On the same page I criticized that author’s “biases and prejudices”, while on the next page I condemned his claims of a Jewish conspiracy as “totally unsustainable”.”http://www.joelhayward.com/drhaywardssubmissioni.htmIn Sept. 2008 US presidential candidate Christopher Dodd publishes his father Thomas Dodd’s letters home to his wife from Nuremburg where he was a star prosecutor. There were too many Jews there, he concurred, “Jews should stay away from this trial – for their own sake,” Dodd explains. He doesn’t want them to supply anti-Semites and isolationists with ammunition – afraid of a possible growing sentiment to
describe the war as a”war for the Jews.”

Senator Chris Dodd doesn’t have the decency to admit that his grandstanding dad presented false evidence at Nuremburg so he lets the legend of the phony Polish shrunken heads found at Buchenwald (quite possibly supplied by one or more ” Ritchie Boys”) stand: http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/nazishrunkenheads/

Not to be overlooked is also collusion between the OSS, the Polish Government-in-Exile, The British War Executive, The War Refugee Board and the The Joint Distribution Committee, Jan Karski, Rudolph Vrba, Sefton Delmer, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck et all. Those who believed Tony Blair when he told them he had it from his spymasters that missiles launched from Bhagdad could reach London in 45 minutes will enjoy this:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article530349.ece

If you have an extra 9 hours plus time to sift through the written addendums, like the written report on the follow up conversation with the US psyche warfare soldier who probably helped set things up at Buchenwald for the crew filming the liberation, you should at least check out a couple of these.

That’s “denierbud’s” research and it’s unique because it’s visual, not written. My research is written and hard to slog through. My primary interest is the holocaust only as it pertains to Romania.

US presidential candidate Christopher Dodd publishes his father Thomas Dodd’s letters home to his wife from Nuremburg where he was a star prosecutor. There were too many Jews there, he concurred, “Jews should stay away from this trial – for their own sake,” Dodd explains. He doesn’t want them to supply anti-Semites and isolationists with ammunition – afraid of a possible growing sentiment to describe the war as a ”war for the Jews.”

Then there’s the collaboration between the OSS, Polish Government-in-exile in London, Sir Robert Bruce Lockhart’s PWE (Political Warfare Executive) The War Refugee Board and the Joint Distribution Committee, Jan Karski, Rudolph Vrba, Sefton Delmer, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck et all. Those who believed Tony Blair when he told them he had it from his spymasters that missiles launched from Bhagdad could reach London in 45 minutes will enjoy knowing that the Holocaust just got more shocking…

Thanks Who Dares Wings. The connections you draw between Raphael Lemkin, his invention of the term “genocide,” the spin doctoring of the Freud/Bernays clan, and the Nuremberg Trials is important. For some time now I have wondered if there were some unseen elements in the genesis of the juridical concept of genocide. Apparently that is the case. Live and learn.

Ben Gad is a crooked con man. An honest man would acknowledge that accusing someone falsely of a crime and utilizing the law to silence them is pure hatred. That is Ben Gan. If he lived In civilized country he would be headed for Israel post haste. How did Canada descend to such depths? Harvey Taylor

“DISHONEST DEBATING TACTIC”
Here is a comment by Bob Klinck. He commented under the reposted article at radicalpress.com. He makes an important observation, so I am reposting his comment here:

Gadd says: “A person of integrity doesn’t try to convince others that dark-skinned people, for example (substitute indigenous people or Muslims or Jews, etc.) are evil and/or subhuman and should be discriminated against. Such beliefs are in themselves evil, because they are lies. These are not honest beliefs. These are falsehoods so easily exposed that they can be accepted only by the willing suspension of disbelief. You have to want to believe them, despite all the evidence. And there goes your integrity.”

Speaking of lack of integrity, what does this “straw man” tangent, with most of which almost everyone would agree, no doubt Monika included, have to do with anything she has said? This associating of an opponent with an irrelevant position is a dishonest debating tactic of the sort one resorts to when he wants to avoid engagement on the substance of an issue.

I remember TV host Larry King once stating that 7 million Jews died in the Holocaust. Does his departure from the standard figure of 6 million (BYW, not sustained by any specialized Holocaust historian I am aware of) place him in the category of “denier”? Wouldn’t a normal reaction be to inquire where he got his number from–and in any case isn’t he entitled to his belief in it?

OH MY GADD!!!! LOL 🙂 …honestly, this whole scene/scenario is something I have been WAITING to witness for many years! Monika, you are AMAZING! You have kick-started the controversy/debate which is LONG over-due. Of course there are going to be millions of “Gadds”, let’s try to be patient and understanding with them… the human brain just works like that unfortunately – most people just are not able to ‘make the leap’ when the deception has been life-long and omnipresent. The funniest thing in all of this in fact is how absurdly easy it is to prove that Hitler and the Nazis never had any “extermination plans”. Of course the Nazis rounded up most of the Jews and put them to work in work camps > nobody is denying this fact, and nobody is celebrating it either. . . but planned extermination is entirely another thing and a brief look into the the facts will very quickly put that myth into the trash can.

Again… I am so happy that this debate is now FINALLY raging! The reason I am happy is that the truth is so obvious and in the end it will prevail.

More and more people are coming around to the common sense of revisionist history of the Second World War. The crime here is not Canada’s disgusting hate speech law’s which are nothing but a spoiled and pampered special interest group’s attempt at censorship. The real crime is the persecution of revisionists often labelled ‘holocaust deniers.’ If you thought Canada had free speech I am afraid you will be disappointed. This country can best be described as a soft tyranny.

Monika, there are many truth-seekers, such as yourself out there. Fortunately, for the present time, I live in the USA where the search for the TRUTH about the “holocaust ™” is not (yet) a crime…

If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD THEY KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would they build “camps” hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, recreational, medical and other ancillary facilities. Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? The jewish communist Bolsheviks did just that with the non-communist civilian populations of the conquered countries in the communist orbit.

Something BIG “stinks” in this whole jewish “holocaust ™” deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made “deals” with the Nazis in order to make life “uncomfortable” for jewish Germans.

The establishment of a “homeland” was a Zionist “dream” since the 1800s. What better way to encourage “emigration” to a barren land than to make things difficult for the “cream of German society” (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” is out . . .

The so-called jewish “holocaust ™” has been turned into a de-facto “religion” in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish “holocaust ™” truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the “tribe” that FEAR the real truth of the jewish “holocaust ™” being exposed is evident.

The truth about this minor event in human history will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. . . “there’s NO business like “SHOAH business”.

Jewish complicity in this event is carefully “covered up”.

It is curious to note that jewish interests will hunt down and imprison a 90 plus year-old German “camp guard” while looking the other way when their “own kind” was involved in truly brutal actions. Camp “capos” and “sonderkommandos” (who were primarily jewish) come to mind. Not one of these jewish “collaborators” has been brought to (jewish) justice. I guess blood is thicker than water.

A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question “official” jewish “holocaust” orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the “official” jewish “holocaust” story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to “all things holocaust”.

Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment. . .

If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the “chosen”) to engineer the jewish “holocaust”, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish “holocaust” was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many “holocausts” of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish “holocaust” is the only one that counts . . .

Most jews will never be satisfied with knowing that those that commit evil deeds on earth in this lifetime will pay for it in the next life . . . they have taken vengeance from the Creator and appointed themselves the exacter of vengeance (in contradiction to mosaic law but not their anti-gentile talmud).

Most jews are vengeful people that will never pass up a chance to “make a buck” by screwing a gentile (goyim) out of money or property. jews were hated in Germany for taking advantage of the non-jew Germans between the two world wars. The average German did not have a pot to piss in while his wealthy jewish neighbor was trading food for land . . . taking advantage of the jewish bankster situation in Germany.

Look at the “commercialization” of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish “holocaust ™” “survivors”, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean “camp” numbers) on their children and grandchildren.

Since the jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a “homeland” – Israel.

Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland” for the last two-hundred years while predicting a “holocaust ™” of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures).

Regarding that “holocaust ™” “showplace” Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called “gas chambers”. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called “gassing” took place”. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the “operators” of these supposed “gas chambers”.

American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported “gas chambers”, had them tested and published his results. The absence of methylene blue in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the “gas chambers” did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing.

Mr. Leuchter was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the “tribe”. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts “law” for “practicing engineering without a license” – a law which had never been used before or since. . .

It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to “create” the “death camps” for propaganda purposes.

The engineering inconsistencies proves that these “death camps” were recreated for communist propaganda purposes. Germans were excellent engineers, and as such, would not have made the engineering “mistakes” that are evident.

Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. However, the prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

After the end of WW2, these same “camps” were used to intern German civilians. These German civilians were subject to much greater deprivation and suffering than the previous “occupants” of these “camps”. In fact, jews were controlling these camps, at the behest of the Allied forces, and were vicious in their treatment of those interned. In fact, the German civilians interned were defined as “disarmed enemy combatants” despite being civilians, so that Geneva Convention rules would not apply to them.

In fact, it was JEWS that ran the internment camps after WW2. I guess vengeance was theirs, as the Germans made the jews WORK (manual labor in the camps) for the first time in their lives…

I am a revisionist. It is very unfortunate that a few of my fellow revisionists, well known ones too, believe in Chemtrails, flying saucers, hollow earth and other nonsense. It completely ruins their credibility.
ron

What does Ben Gadd have to say about Jews who are holocaust revisionists ? If all revisionists are simply inspired by anti Jew sentiment then how does he explain people like David Cole and Roger Dommergue ?https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6912

I have been disgusted with Canada’s justice system since the days of Ernst Zundel’s first trial in 1985. It was a trial which should not have taken place. No group let alone the Talmudists/Zionists should have that type of power in a society which prides itself on free speech. The moral of the story is quite sad. You don’t question the Chosen or any of their pet dogmas for fear of some Kafka-esque persecution. And I for one am getting very weary of their Purimshpiel.

Blogs I Follow

Author John Wear reveals evidence contradicting the narrative we have been taught about Germany, Japan & the Allies in World War II. WEARS WAR is the battle to bring FAKE HISTORY into accord with the facts.