That was a good trade, even if it would be cool to hear James Earl Jones say,"And you had to wonder if I have all my teeth ... Listen, you're a dick."_________________"Worse comes to worst, my people come first, but my tribe lives on every country on earth. Iíll do anything to protect them from hurt, the human race is what I serve." - Baba Brinkman

It's really more about organization of conversations than bullying. It's easier to check the posts in one thread than multiple threads having virtually the same conversation topic. We are OCD about it because we have no moderator to move/delete/sticky threads for us. So it's important that new posters understand the organization. You have the right to post whatever threads you like but then don't get mad when we yell at you for disrupting our organization that we have worked so hard to craft in an unmoderated forum.

Thank you for your common courtesy, Eureka. Yours is the only reply that did not go scatalogical within fifteen characters, and, predictably, the only one that actually explained anything._________________

Re: Eureka, a lovely person, a school teacher, and an all round good egg:

Death Ray wrote:

If you wanted to append your complaint about "new and pointless threads" to my strip whoring, I could see your point. But if you are going to make that complaint when I try to expand the general discussion on the General Discussion board, well, that's just cyberbullying, and I'm calling my congressman. I'm as free to start threads as you are to ignore them, yet here you are (and ignoring my topic, by the way).

Death Ray wrote:

Thank you for your common courtesy, Eureka.

Extend a bit of 'common courtesy' her way a little more often, and a little less disingenously, perhaps, and you'll get a far more favourable reception when you occaisionally drop in here, Jason.

We all know that Jason only posted these as separate topics because his opinions are so shit boring and poorly explained that the only way for him to get any replies or attention at all was to post them in their own threads. If they'd been in the GOP thread they would have been rightly ignored, or chewed on by Willem and then abandoned.

How can someone who has been on the internet for so long be so bad at written communication?_________________Once, at a local NOW meeting where I was the only male among about a dozen women, a feminism trivia contest was held. I came in third.

Breakthrough explanations are good! We all learned things! Now the real test is to see if we can put what we've learned into action._________________Eureka00: "Reminding you of your addictions" since 1982.

It's really more about organization of conversations than bullying. It's easier to check the posts in one thread than multiple threads having virtually the same conversation topic. We are OCD about it because we have no moderator to move/delete/sticky threads for us. So it's important that new posters understand the organization. You have the right to post whatever threads you like but then don't get mad when we yell at you for disrupting our organization that we have worked so hard to craft in an unmoderated forum.

Thank you for your common courtesy, Eureka. Yours is the only reply that did not go scatalogical within fifteen characters, and, predictably, the only one that actually explained anything.

To be fair, how to interact with people is usually something you learn as a child and shouldn't need to be explained to you. Luckily for you eureka is an early-childhood educator._________________"Worse comes to worst, my people come first, but my tribe lives on every country on earth. Iíll do anything to protect them from hurt, the human race is what I serve." - Baba Brinkman

yeah, your image based story telling isn't much clearer. Am I at the door, or am I in his loungeroom? If I'm at the door, how did the snot hit me? It just isn't clear, Jason._________________Once, at a local NOW meeting where I was the only male among about a dozen women, a feminism trivia contest was held. I came in third.