Crimes and misconduct by the lawyers at Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A. form the basis of all my Bar complaints, and involve 20 related civil lawsuits and legal
proceedings. A list is found at Exhibit 8. Mr. Bauer and Mr. Rodems engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity to subvert or undermine my initial complaint against Bauer, file no. 2011-00,073
(8B).

While the Florida Bar does not have jurisdiction to consider civil or criminal violations of RICO, the Racketeering, Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961-68, it does
have jurisdiction and a duty to investigate related breaches of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rules 4-8.4(c), 4-8.4(d), and 4-8.3(a), breaches of duty that facilitate the RICO
activity.

Mr. Rodems and Mr. Bauer engaged in a pattern of RICO activity in violation of Rules 4-8.4(c), 4-8.4(d), and Rule 4-8.3(a), to improperly force a settlement in my
federal Civil Rights and ADA disability lawsuit, commenced in U.S. District Court, M.D.Fla., case no. 5:10-cv-00503, to which Mr. Bauer and his firm are Defendants. The case will soon to be submitted
as a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court in C.A.11 cases 12-11028 and 12-11213.

On June 21, 2011 Mr. Rodems improperly obtained for Mr. Bauer’s benefit a settlement from me during a coercive confinement at the Edgecomb Courthouse in Tampa, held
without disability accommodation...

It appeared that the settlement resolved the $12,650 charging lien used by Mr. Bauer to hold my case file. Mr. Bauer said no. Bauer sent me a letter dated August 24,
2012 stating that Rodems’ "Settlement Agreement and General Mutual Release" of June 21, 2011 does not bind him, it binds me. Mr. Bauer’s letter appears at Exhibit 17. This is the operative
quote:

Mr. Rodem's (sic) release dated June 21, 2011 does not have any legal effect on the amount of money that is owed to this firm. Further, it does not bind this firm in any
way. I (sic) does bind you - but not us.

I was shocked by Mr. Bauer’s statement, as Mr. Castagliuolo made the decision to accept this settlement. I do not understand how a settlement can only bind me.
Castagliuolo never explained this to me. I believe this is further evidence that Mr. Castagliuolo worked against my interest, and engaged in a pattern of RICO activity with Mr. Bauer and Mr. Rodems
to undermine my Bar complaints, and civil litigation, through an ongoing pattern of misconduct in violation of Rules 4-8.4(c), 4-8.4(d), and 4-8.3(a), breaches of duty that facilitate the RICO
activity.

This evidence shows how the lawyer discipline process in Florida is subverted and undermined, here by Mr. Rodems, who’s misconduct is at the center of this matter,
through an ongoing breach of Rules 4-8.4(c), 4-8.4(d), and 4-8.3(a), where lawyer-adversaries conspire to, and engage in, conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, to
obstruct justice and mislead the Bar or its tribunal, to avoid discipline well in advance of any Bar complaint. This activity raises an immediate conflict between the lawyer-adversaries and the
lawyer representing the client. If the misconduct is not reported as required under Rule 4-8.3(a), the client is not being represented in a zealous, competent or diligent manner because the lawyer
has a conflict with his client created by the offer of assistance from opposing counsel in any future Bar complaint.

Bad Boy Robert Bauer - More Unhappy Clients

Robert W. Bauer

Angela V. Woodhull, Ph.D. states Robert Bauer filed a number of "Attorney Charging Liens" in cases involving Dr. Woodhull’s mother, including the Guardianship of
Louise A. Falvo, Case No. 2008-CP-000741, and the Estate of Louise A. Falvo, Case No: 01-2008-CP-1083, Eight Judicial Circuit, Alachua County; and other cases, including in the Fifth District Court
of Appeal.

Dr. Woodhull provided me January 4, 2012 a certified copy of her pro se pleading in the estate case, the docket entry of December 18, 2009, "Response To And
Motion To Strike Or In The Alternative Motion To Dismiss Attorney Bauer’s Motions For Attorney’s Charging Lien And Motion For Sanctions Against Attorney Robert Bauer".

Phillip Strauss, who is 90 years old, called me January 4, 2012 to discuss his Bar complaint against Robert Bauer, Phillip Strauss v. Robert W. Bauer;
TFB File No.: 2012-00,146 (8B), August 24, 2011. Mr. Strauss hired and was dissatisfied with Mr. Bauer over representation in a small claims action involving his homeowners insurance
company. ﻿

Another Bauer client filed a Bar complaint too, see James and Betty DeCoursey v. Robert W. Bauer, TFB File No. 2012-00,054(8b), July 8, 2011. The
complaint alleges that the DeCourseys are disabled and elderly, and that Mr. Bauer failed to properly represent them in a foreclosure matter. ﻿

Bar to Review Finding of No Probable Cause

Carl Schwait

Email April 19, 2011 from Dana Thrash for James Watson "This is to advise you that this matter has been forwarded to Carl Schwait, Designated Reviewer, for his
review. You will receive a response from him when his review has been completed."

The email below questions the misleading practice of the Florida Bar to refer to the grievance committee as Bar’s "grand jury" in communication with
complainants. In fact, the Bar’s grievance committee has little in common with an actual grand jury. ﻿

Letter of Carl Schwait, June 27, 2011, "After comprehensively reading all documents in my possession in reference to the above styled complaint, I have determined
that I wish to defer to the finding of the grievance committee."﻿

July 31, 2011 request to review the documents Carl Schwait comprehensively read. The Bar failed to comply with Rule 3-7.4(k) because it did not explain why the
complaint did not warrant further proceedings given the overwhelming evidence of misconduct; also failed to include any documentation explaining why the complaint did not warrant further proceedings.
﻿

Letter Report, No Probable Cause Finding

March 18, 2011 James N. Watson, Jr. Chief Branch Discipline Counsel issued a Letter Report Pursuant to Rule 3-7.4(k) of No Probable Cause Finding. On the basis of a
diligent and impartial analysis of all the information available, on March I5, 2011, the grievance committee found no probable cause for further disciplinary proceedings in this matter. The
membership of the committee is made up of both attorneys and non-attorneys.Eighth Circuit Grievance Committee "B"This case is now closed.

Because the Bar only has the authority to address questions of ethics, the committee could not address any legal issues. Pursuant to the Bar's records retention schedule, the computer record and file
will be disposed of one year from the date of closing.

The Florida Bar referred Mr. Bauer to me February 26, 2007. We met at his office March 1, 2007. I paid Mr. Bauer a $3,000 retainer March 8, 2007 to review my case.
Mr. Bauer accepted my case after a review of the file and we discussed the case by telephone. Our Attorney Consultation & Fee Contract was executed April 24, 2007.

A transcript of the March 29, 2007 phone call from Mr. Bauer to me is below in PDF. The transcript impeaches a number of statements in Mr. Bauer's response to the Florida Bar dated August 18,
2010.

Mr. Bauer telephoned me February 9, 2009 about his motion to withdrawal as counsel. During the call Mr. Bauer and I agreed to change his billing from hourly to a
contingent fee. There was no mention of a separate settlement agreement. On Mach 9, 2009 Mr. Bauer provided a ‘contingent fee’ agreement to replace the hourly fee contract but he did not sign it. The
agreement included a settlement agreement for his prior wrongdoing.

On May 14, 2009 I proposed my own ‘contingent fee agreement’ to Mr. Bauer but he refused to discuss or agree to the terms. Also on May 14, 2009 I proposed my own ‘settlement agreement’ to Mr. Bauer
but he refused to discuss or agree to the terms. I executed both agreements. Mr. Bauer did not respond to my proposals. In effect his offer of March 9, 2009 was a ‘take it or leave it’ contract of
adhesion. See a transcript of the call below in PDF. The transcript impeaches a number of statements in Mr. Bauer's response to the Florida Bar dated August 18, 2010.

Rodems comments on Bauer complaint

Ryan Rodems

Ryan Christopher Rodems weighed in on my complaint against Mr. Bauer. This is unusual and goes to Mr. Rodems inappropriate involvement in the underlying case that
necessitated Mr. Bauer’s representation. In fact, Mr. Rodems’ letter to the Bar of August 13, 2010 arrived before Mr. Bauer’s response of August 18, 2010. See Mr. Rodems’ letter below in PDF, along
with my rebuttal dated September 20, 2010.

MR. RODEMS: We object to the motion for leave to amend because there is no such thing as a "counter-counter complaint", and you are flat wrong on the
motion to withdraw the dismissal. Have you even looked at Rule 1.100(a)? I assume you are aware of the line of cases that hold that a mislabeled pleading or motion is not a nullity. We'll send you a
57.105 motion, and you can decide how to proceed.

MR. BAUER: "I admit that a counter-counterclaim is a strange pleading."

MR. BAUER: "As a professional courtesy I would appreciate if you would clearly spell out your reasons as to why you believe I have erred in my motion
prior to you filing for 57.105 sanctions. Such threats are not conducive to this case moving forward in a collegial and professional manner."

Six (6) section 57.105 motions in a single case

Ryan Rodems

Mr. Rodems testified at the March 20, 2008 hearing on the attorney's fees that "I am board-certified in civil trial law and I've been practicing law since 1992."
(transcript, page 14, line 23). Mr. Rodems also testified that "I've been trying cases for the last 16 years." (transcript, page 15, line 4). On cross examination, Mr. Bauer asked: "How many 57.105
actions have you been involved in?" (transcript, page 15, line 18). Mr. Rodems testified: "I filed I believe two in this case and I may have filed one or two other ones in my career but I couldn't be
sure exactly." (transcript, page 15, line 20).

Mr. Rodems filed six (6) section 57.105 motions in this lawsuit and threatened more. That may be a record in a single case in
Florida.

Attorney Seldon J. Childers, Independent Evaluation

Seldon J. Childers

On July 7, 2009 Mr. Childers proposed "a four-hour retainer for the review of the documents, telephone consultation(s), and preparation of a report." This was to
review and advise me in matters pertaining to the lawsuit Gillespie v. Barker, Rodems & Cook, PA, et al., Case No. 05-CA-7205, Circuit Civil, Hillsborough County, Florida. At the time attorney
Robert Bauer was counsel of record but he stopped representing me October 13, 2008 and filed a motion to withdrawal.

On September 17, 2009 Mr. Childers provided the following documents by email:

Tanya Marie Uhl was her name while employed by Mr. Bauer. Tanya Marie Bell is her name now.

Ms. Bell claims she did not actually work on my cases but just filed documents at the direct direction of Mr. Bauer. This revelation is important concerning one document she filed in my case in
Hillsborough Circuit Civil Court (case no. 05-CA-7205), Plaintiff’s Motion For Rehearing, that bears her signature and is dated July 16, 2008. (PDF below). Ms. Bell provided a letter stating "In
regards to the Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing that I signed, I did so at the direct request of Robert W. Bauer in his absence. I did not prepare that Motion or even work on that Motion. To my
knowledge, I was not directly involved in your case." (PDF below).

Robert Bauer misled the Florida Bar about agreement

Ms. Bell’s statement is significant and impeaches Mr. Bauer’s response to the Bar of August 18, 2010: "Mr. Gillespie also alleges that I "failed to present evidence
that there was no signed contingent fee agreement," subsequent to Mr. Rodems' representations that there were. This allegation underscores much of the basis for my motion for withdrawal." (Bauer,
Aug-18-10, page 3, paragraph 3, PDF below).

In my opinion this information proves Mr. Bauer misled the Florida Bar in his response dated August 18, 2010. Dishonesty is prohibited by Rule 4-8.4(c) and Rule 4-8.4(d), Rules Regulating The
Florida Bar

Rule 4-8.4 Misconduct
A lawyer shall not:
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation...
(d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice...

Plaintiff’s Motion For Rehearing dated July 16, 2008 shows that Barker, Rodems & Cook, PA, failed to sign a representation agreement with me. This is likely a
violation of Bar Rule 4-1.5(f)(2). My affidavit of July 20, 2010 shows there was no signed agreement between me and Barker, Rodems & Cook, PA. There is also an email (PDF below) from Mr. Bauer’s
employee Ann G. Breeden on August 12, 2008 asking me the following:

Mr. Gillespie-
Mr. Rodems has responded to Mr. Bauer regarding our Motion for Rehearing. He specifically was asking about a reference made to a statement made by Mr. Rodems about Barker, Rodems, and Cook being in
possession of a signed fee agreement. Mr. Bauer has asked me to review the transcripts of the two hearings to ensure that Mr. Rodems did in fact state that at one of the hearings. We are having
trouble locating the transcripts to these hearings. Mr. Bauer has asked me to contact you and ask if you would kindly forward the e-mailed transcripts of the hearings dated October 30, 2007 and July
1, 2008 so that we can respond to Mr. Rodems. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Thank you,
Ann G. Breeden

Bauer mislead Bar about ‘knowledge and assistance’ with appeal

Mr. Bauer responded to the Florida Bar August 18, 2010: "As I stated earlier, Mr. Gillespie was adamant about appealing the Final Judgment. I explained to him that an
appeal was not appropriate, but he proceeded to file the appeal anyway without my knowledge or assistance." (page 8, paragraph 3)

Actually Mr. Bauer's firm helped me file the appeal with his full knowledge of my effort.

Joshua A. Cossey

On April 25, 2008 Joshua A. Cossey, JD emailed me and wrote: "Be advised that I am drafting the Notice of Filing Appeal and will set the document for your signature."
On April 28, 2010 Mr. Bauer emailed asking me "It my understanding that you will be hand delivering the Notice of Appeal to the Clerk of Court today. I would appreciate if you would advise me when
that has been completed." See the emails below in PDF.

Greetings Mr. Gillespie,
It was a pleasure speaking with you today regarding the questions and concerns raised surrounding case 05-CA-007205. Per our conversation, I have attached the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure so
that you may have it on hand if needed. While I can not advise you or provide legal opinions as to what should be done (strictly defaulting to Mr. Bauer), I note my personal attention to Rule 9.110.
You will hear from this office before close of business tomorrow regarding this offices involvement and direction surrounding the appeal and other issues raised in our conversation.
Respectfully,
Joshua A. Cossey, JD

Natalia Ricardo, legal assistant to Mr. Bauer, provided me the appeal documents to file on April 25, 2008 by email, see PDF below.

Mr. Gillespie,
Attached please find the Notice of Filing Appeal as well as the Final Judgment (in one pdf). Should you have any problems viewing the attachment, please do not hesitate to contact me via e-mail or at
the telephone number listed below.
Sincerely,
Natalia D. Ricardo
Legal Assistant to Robert W. Bauer, P.A.

Michael Wasserman was the Chair of the Florida Bar Lawyer Referral Service Committee. For more about the LRS, seetheLRS Justice Network page. On October 7, 2009 I contacted Mr. Wasserman about the LRS application for
Mr. Bauer.

Mr. Wasserman called October 7, 2009 and we discussed the referral of Mr. Bauer.It was a pleasure speaking with Michael
Wasserman.A transcript of the call is below.

Mary Ellen Bateman responded to public records request for Mr. Bauer and the LRS. It was a pleasure speaking with Ms. Bateman. Mr. Bauer was a
referral from the LRS. For more about the LRS, seetheLRS Justice Network page.

Karen Kelly, Director, Fla Bar Public Service Programs

Karen Kelly is Director of the Florida Bar's Public Service Programs. It is always a pleasure speaking with Ms. Kelly. On October 8, 2009 Ms. Kelly
wrote in an email to me "Mr. Bauer nor the firm of Clayton-Johnson, P.A. ever notified The Florida Bar Lawyer Referral Service that he left the firm and started his own firm in Gainesville." Read
more in the PDF below.

Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics & Advertising Counsel

Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics & Advertising Counsel for the Florida Bar, was unable to answer the following advertising ethics question because
her assistance is only for members of the Bar, not consumers who use the Florida Bar Lawyer Referral Service.

Question: I contacted TFB LRS for a referral for a lawyer who does libel and slander litigation. A referral was made, but the lawyer has little or no experience with libel or
slander. Doesn’t this violate the following rule?

Rule 4-7.2, communications concerning a lawyer’s services
(b) Prohibited Statements and Information
(5) Advertising areas of practice - a lawyer or law firm shall not advertise for legal employment in an area of practice in which the advertising lawyer or law firm does not currently practice
law

Other Correspondence with the Florida Bar

On July 19, 2010 The Florida Bar responded that my correspondence was being returned without action having been taken because the material submitted was too
voluminous to process and contained media they cannot process.

On July 30, 2010 William Gautier Kitchen, Bar Counsel for the Attorney Consumer Assistance Program, wrote me that a response from Mr.
Bauer was due in the Bar’s office by August 13, 2010 and that Mr. Bauer was to provide me a copy.

As of August 16, 2010 I did not receive a response from Mr. Bauer or any word from the Florida Bar. I called Mr. Kitchen August 17, 2010
and he said that a 10 day extension was given to Mr. Bauer allowing him until August 23, 2010 to respond. You can listen to my phone call with Mr. Kitchen here.

I spoke with Mr. Kitchen August 25, 2010 by phone and he accused me of threatening a lawsuit against the Florida Bar during our August
17, 2010 phone call. You can listen to Mr. Kitchen’s accusation here and draw your own conclusion.

On March 31, 2008, Mr. Bauer proposed a new representation contract with higher rates for certain employees. A cover letter admits billing errors by Mr. Bauer in his
favor, and claims unpaid bills to First Choice Reporting. Those bills were, in fact, paid in advance as required by First Choice. This contract was not executed by either party.

First Choice made numerous transcription and billing errors that were left up to me to fix. My efforts are reflected in the "Settlement Agreement and Release" I
prepared and First Choice executed July 16, 2008, see attached. Initially Mr. Bauer insisted on using First Choice Reporting but after all the errors he agreed to Berryhill Court Reporters that
covered the case for me from the beginning, and after First Choice was dismissed.

Mr. Bauer telephoned me February 9, 2009 about his motion to withdrawal as counsel. During the call Mr. Bauer and I agreed to change the billing from hourly to a
contingent fee. There was no mention of a separate settlement agreement.

On Mach 9, 2009, Mr. Bauer provided a ‘contingent fee’ agreement to replace the hourly fee contract. Mr. Bauer sought to execute a separate settlement agreement for
any prior negligence. This was not discussed or agreed to during our conversation February 9, 2009. Neither document was not executed.

On May 14, 2009 I proposed my own ‘contingent fee agreement’ to Mr. Bauer but he refused to discuss or agree to the terms. Also on May 14, 2009 I proposed my own
‘settlement agreement’ to Mr. Bauer but he refused to discuss or agree to the terms. A copy of my agreements, which I executed, are attached with cover letter.

Comments

Discussion closed

CLT(Tuesday, June 18 13 11:10 pm EDT)

The corruption goes all the way to the State Attorney's Office. The same thing happened to me in Levy County. I watched Attorney's laugh in court about the outcome of the defendants and their demise
like it was a joke.Judge Roundtree, Silverman, Ysletla, ALL ABOVE THE LAWS FEDERAL AND STATE. STEALING HOMES LEFT AND RIGHT FROM CITIZENS, MILITARY, AND THE ELDERLY. THEY COULD CARE LESS. I HAVE
REPORTED TO THE FBI, US ATTORNEY, NO ONE GIVES A CRAP.

Thre is nothing you can do to be heard.The Bar is as corrupted as the attorneys. Like you I have done complaints to the Bar,The Bar cover up every complaint. We are lost no one can help us in the
terryfing U.S. legal system, the ..internet, the last resort, no body cares you are alone in your fight.The attorney has take to Court false documents to place lien againt my property and the Judge
has given the Order to facilitated this robery. What do I do ? where do I go ?to another crook lawyer? The UNITED STATES legal system IS A PATHETIC JOKE.

Every nation has a creation myth, or origin myth, which is the story people are taught of how the nation came into being. Ours says the United States began with
Columbus's so-called "discovery" of America, continued with settlement by brave Pilgrims, won its independence from England with the American Revolution, and then expanded westward until it became
the enormous, rich country you see today.

That is the origin myth. It omits three key facts about the birth and growth of the United States as a nation. Those facts demonstrate that White Supremacy is
fundamental to the existence of this country.Read

On the dayBennie Coleman lost his house, the day armed U.S. marshals came to his door and ordered him off the property, he slumped in a folding chair across the street and watched the vestiges of his 76 years hauled to
the curb...because he didn’t pay a $134 property tax
bill.

60 Minutes' Steve Kroft Talks To Carl HiaasenIn a little less than a
century, the state of Florida has been transformed from a largely uninhabited swamp to the fourth-largest state in the union. And no one has written about that transformation more successfully than
Carl Hiaasen.

Carl Hiaasen on Florida:

"The Sunshine State is a paradise of scandals teeming with drifters, deadbeats, and misfits drawn here by some dark primordial
calling like demented trout. And you'd be surprised how many of them decide to run for public office."

In 1902, 140,000 miners went on strike, wanting higher pay, shorter work hours, and better housing.....Roosevelt...use[d] the military to run the mines in the "public
interest". The mining companies...accepted the demands of the UMW...more﻿﻿

Presidential Library and Museum

Pro labor: Labor is prior to, and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first
existed. Labor is the superior of capital and deserves much higher consideration.Abraham
Lincoln pro labor quote﻿

Todayeconomic slaveryhas many people indebt chains. Economic or debt slavery ismore efficientfor its masters than the slavery of the Old South. Debt slaves must
feed, house and clothe themselves. Thedebt slave masters, thebanks,credit card companies, and even student loan providers, all rely upon the courts and justice system for enforcement of debt. When economic slaves can’t pay back their debt, they are told to get a second job. Or a third job.

Meanwhile, when thewell-connected mastersof economic slaves get in a financial bind, and
bring our economy to the brink of collapse, they call on politicians in Washington, DC for bailouts.Bankers don’t get second
or third jobs, they get million-dollar bonuses.

Theeconomic slave mastershave access to the best lawyers, sympathetic judges, and sheriff’s
deputies ready to haul the debt slave to court, or throw him and his family out of their
home and into the street. Does anyone see a problem with thisscenario? Where is the John Brown for today’sdebt slaves?﻿

The State Department's top spokesman resigned Sunday, three days after criticizing the Pentagon for its treatment of [Manning]...P.J. Crowley, the assistant secretary of State for public affairs, told a group at [MIT]...that the Pentagon's treatment of Pfc. Bradley Manning was "ridiculous and stupid and
counterproductive." His comments were made public by a blogger who attended the session.More here, and Politico, andThe Washington
Post

FORTY years ago today, The New York Times began publishing the Pentagon Papers, a seminal moment not only for freedom of the press but also for the role of
whistle-blowers — like Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the papers to expose the mishandling of the war in Vietnam — in defending our democracy.Read more﻿﻿

Senior ranking US military leaders have so distorted the truth when communicating with the US Congress and American people in regards to conditions on the ground in
Afghanistan that the truth has become unrecognizable.Read
more﻿

"I really don't like the term 'PTSD,’” Department of Veterans Affairs psychiatrist Dr. Jonathan Shay told PBS' "Religion & Ethics Newsweekly" in 2010. "He says the diagnostic
definition of "post-traumatic stress disorder" is a fine description of certain instinctual survival skills that persist into everyday life after a person has been in mortal danger — but the
definition doesn't address the entirety of a person's injury after the trauma of war. "I view the persistence into civilian life after battle," he says, "... as the simple or primary
injury." Dr. Shay on YouTube

Dr. Shay has his own name for the thing the clinical definition of PTSD leaves out. He calls it "moral injury" — and the term is catching on with both the VA and the
Department of Defense.

Moral injury, Dr. Shay says, can happen when "there is a betrayal of what's right by someone who holds legitimate authority in a high-stakes situation."read more

The Marine Corps, the most male of the armed services, is taking its first steps toward integrating women into war-fighting units, starting with its infantry officer
school at Quantico, Va., and ground combat battalions that had once been closed to women.

Stars and Stripes exists to provide independent news and information to the U.S. military community, comprised
of active-duty, DoD civilians, contractors, and their families. Unique among the many Department of Defense authorized news outlets, only Stars and Stripes is guaranteed First Amendment privileges
that are subject to Congressional oversight.﻿ Go to the website

Our motto: "FIGHTING FOR THE TRUTH. . .EXPOSING THE CORRUPT" is our battle cry! We go after, not only pompous brasshats and as COL. David Hackworth so ably put it -
the "perfumed princes" like Gen. Wesley Clark - but Gestapo-like MP's, CID, NIS, OIS and other alphabet agency "bully boys" who ignore the Constitution of the United States and the right to Due
Process.﻿

Major Heather Penney recounts the drama in the skies after District of Columbia Air National Guard pilots scrambled to intercept incoming hostile planes. She
describes why F-16’s initially took off from Andrews Air Force Base unarmed – and what she was prepared to do to bring down a plane piloted by terrorists. And she recounts how later that day she
helped escort President Bush and Air Force One back to Andrews Air Force Base.﻿ C-Span
Interview

Information on this website is a free public service. While the information on this site deals with legal issues, it does not constitute
legal advice. If you have specific questions related to information available on this site, you are encouraged to consult an attorney who can investigate the particular circumstances of your
situation.

Due to the rapidly changing nature of the law and our reliance on information provided by outside sources, this website does not warranty or guarantee the accuracy or
availability of the content on this site or on other sites to which we link.

In no event will this website be held liable to any party for any damages arising in any way out of the availability, use, reliance on or inability to use this website
or any information provided by or through this website, or for any claim attributable to errors, omissions or other inaccuracies in, or destructive properties of any information provided by or
through, this website.

Neil J. Gillespie:
1. Does not give legal advice.2. Not a lawyer.3. Not an attorney.4. Not licensed to practice law.5. Did not go to law school.

______________________

Seven Year Anniversary - YouSue.org to NoSue.org

Seven years ago I started the Justice Network with the domain name YouSue.org. This name was chosen in the spirit of YouTube, the video-sharing website that
empowered ordinary people to produce and share video.

Through this website I have met folks from all over the country. Some of their stories are profiled here. Many have reached the conclusion that America’s justice system is broken.

The official Justice Network Internet address is now NoSue.org. This reflects the sad truth that for most Americans the justice system is broken, just a parody of justice. Reform American courts or
avoid them. Your life, health and wealth is at risk. But don’t just take my word, listen to the experts on this site.

The stories, images, and videos on this website are in the public
domain, or featured here under the fair use doctrine if copyrighted. I claim no credit for images posted on this site unless noted. If there is an image on this site that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear, E-mail with a link to the image and it will be removed.