Its really wonderful work. I got some very nice tips for title.
Thanks.

Anonymous

google ATOMIC TYPO, useful newsroom term coined by CF Hanif

http://www.facebook.com/brianhaas Brian Haas

Oh, I fully get that. My point is that web readers shouldn’t have God-awful headlines because we’re writing to please robots.

Robots, that I might add, that can (and have) change their algorithms at any time rendering yesterday’s SEO useless in an instant.

http://www.facebook.com/emerson.schwartzkopf Emerson Schwartzkopf

Since print stories are often tossed verbatim onto newspaper websites — with headlines intact — Mr. Haas’ comment (which he tagged as sarcastic) isn’t far off the mark. I like snappy headlines, but there’s a point to thinking about SEO … unless you’re OK with aggregators writing search-friendly heds and skimming off the readers with higher search-engine placements.

http://www.poynter.org Poynter

Most of these are print headlines, so they aren’t written with that in mind. Just a few of the ones on the list were written for online.

Steve Myers
Poynter.org

http://www.facebook.com/brianhaas Brian Haas

Those are all terrible headlines. Clearly these people aren’t up to date on the latest SEO techniques. Google doesn’t like intelligent, clever or creative. These headlines should all be SEO optimized to please google by spamming common search terms as keywords throughout the headline, subhed and story as well.

It’s a shame that universities and media outlets are putting creativity in front of accumulating more “Google juice”.