Dems backing down from impeachment cries

I remember word of him trying to rework the big banks somehow and forcing the use of smaller ones. Hope they don't kill him before that
lol.

If anything he is working to make it easier for big banks to take over small ones. If he really wanted to mess with the big banks then he would
re-enforce the Glass-Steagall Act.

Well this guy said it, contradicting everything I heard to the contrary. I guess i'll just give up my line of thinking, and vote democrat for the rest
of my life. Thank you for showing me the one and only truth, goodbye.

originally posted by: Moresby
I don't know if there will be an impeachment.

But there's far more evidence of obstruction of justice from Trump than their was against Nixon.

And obstruction was one of the articles of impeachment against Nixon that was passed by the House.

Nixon got nailed for deleting tapes right?

So the fact that all of those emails were requested for an investigation and Trump deleted them all with Bleach Bit is pretty damning!

Oh wait....

Oh wait what Hillary isn't President? So your comparison is just a way to deflect the fact that you cannot refute what he said?

First I am just pointing out you and your ilks hypocrisy. I mean you were all over Hillary for obstruction when she bleach but evidence she was asked
to hand over, right? Oh thatys right, you didn't care about that!

The only evidence we have of any suggestion of obstruction of justice is an anonymous source claiming a memo from Comey said Trump said he hoped the
investigation into Flynn would end.

This is not evidence for obstruction for a number of reasons.

1. Its anonymous.

2. Trump didn't demand the investigation stop, he said he hoped it would because he felt Flynn was innocent.

3. Comey never reported feeling pressured, despite he would have been legally obligated to report this. In fact he testified under oath that he felt
no pressure from the justice department, and that any sort of political pressure like that would be a big deal, meaning he would have reported if
Trump did this.

originally posted by: Wayfarer
There is no point in pursuing impeachment before the mid-term elections. Trump could be actively working with Putin as we speak, but as long as the
Republican Congress is getting what they want out of the arrangement they are happy to allow Putin to pull the strings, so to speak. There is
literally nothing that Trump could do that would get the Repub Congress to impeach him. Only if Democrats regain control of the senate will anything
ever come of it.

Consider this: if the reports all come back with absolute proof of collusion, malfeasance, treason, etc. Would any Trump supporter here among this
forum support him less? The answer is No, you would all just claim it was a grand conspiracy to defraud Trump. Thus, the only reason the Republican
Congress has to impeach trump (base support wavering) is a non-issue because the base will support them no matter what.

You are wrong in at least my case.

If I saw proof of Trump colluding with Russia to hack the DNC, I would not only want his impeachment, but I would want him jailed. But I would want
to see evidence, not reports of anonymous sources.

I will even go a step further. If it is shown that Trump helped Russia hack Hillary, but didn't INTEND to, I would say the same.

When will people get that we are way beyond exposing hypocrisy, it isn't working, they will not stop. It is a war of ideals now unfortunately. The
only way to retake ground is to #draintheswamp, take back schools, kill fake news, and win back western culture from the marxists.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: User1138
I see you are making up statistics on the spot to cover up your poor research skills. Also an open mind doesn't mean you believe anything you read on
the internet. I've already spoken to you on ATS before so I know not to trust you. You need to do better than that.

It's gonna be great when Trump get back. The circus is in town!! Pity the Orange clown will be looking for a soft place to lay down.

From the article.

The FEC, on the other hand, is charged exclusively with monitoring and enforcing the Federal Election Campaign Act. It bars foreign nationals,
companies or governments from donating to U.S. campaign committees or from making expenditures "for the purpose of influencing" an election, and it
also prohibits campaigns from coordinating with outside entities, including foreign ones.

...

The complaint by Fein’s group and the Campaign for Accountability alleges that Russia violated the foreign money ban when its state-run media
outlets and social-media operations disseminated stories intended to boost Trump and damage Clinton. And the complaint contends that there is enough
evidence for the FEC to investigate whether Trump’s associates violated campaign finance laws by coordinating with the Russians, which would run
afoul of the coordination prohibition.

This is one of the most laughable things I have ever read. Facebook ads? Hahaha!!! The entire media of countries such as the UK bashed Trump non
stop on their coverage, in addition to what the US media did.

The private companies of the MSM not only were in the bag for Hillary, but their members overwhelming donated to Hillary.

And we know for a fact, without any investigation needed that these private media companies worked in collusion with the DNC to screw Bernie. Where
is the FEC on that?

You sound like Glen Beck. Are we all to lock arms and start to take back stuff? Talk is cheap. Bush was a supposed conservative-FAIL.

Obama was a huge disappointment. He had a chance to alter the for profit medical system and bring it into the 21st century but FAILED or bought.

Trump is up at bat, we will see. I think he has some serious head winds, separating us into libs, conservs, R's and D's is not going to solve this. We
all need to realize what and who is keeping the separated and why.

You forgot Obama did the same thing with the Hillary investigation. He said she didn't break the law and it was just made up. Yet when trump does the
same thing it's obstruction of justice. Presidents are allowed to have opinions and tell whoever they like. The trick is did they somehow stop an
active investigation. Since in both incidents between Obama and Trump neither investigation was effected than you can't claim obstruction.

You forgot Obama did the same thing with the Hillary investigation. He said she didn't break the law and it was just made up. Yet when trump does the
same thing it's obstruction of justice.

Your right thats another.

Look I stand by if proof is shown that Trump colluded with Russians, arrest him.

But its so funny to see people screeching Obstruction of justice after they defended everything Hillary and Obama did, including Hillary deleting
requested evidence.

Then they have the nerve to compare the Trump situation to Nixon!

I wonder if it is worth all of the anti Trump people to give up all of their own credibility to cheerlead for removing a pres they don't like. At the
end of the day, no matter who is President, I would rather try to be a credible person myself than to willing throw that away to cheerlead for someone
I liked.

If you look at the problems we face it is simple: the establishment government is the enemy of the people, corporate globalist shills, like hydra
level. Western society is in the toilet from Marxism embracing a self destructive coombaya dagger (Manchester bombing last night). These systems are
what control the hypocrite masses.

America is such a goddamn mess nobody wants to step up. Trump has a legacy he want's for his kids, he doesn't want to leave them with this lousy mess.
Now after trump we'd better see more populist candidates or the west is doomed.

This is a conspiracy site and almost nobody wants to admit the conspiracy going on lol. Slightly OT Jontron and pewdiepie just made the official
swedish "hate" list lol gamers just made an illegal hate list. But i'm the crazy paranoid conspiracy theorist right? They openly tell me i'm crazy
and just being fed stuff by the media... when they control all media and shut down alt media like jontron and pewdiepie.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.