Yes to both. 1) is because $-K_Y$ and $-K_X$ have the same section rings (by smallness of $f$); 2) is the so-called Kodaira lemma (big is Q-linearly equivalent to ample+effective).
–
user5117Jun 17 '14 at 11:45

1 Answer
1

Let $f:X\dashrightarrow Y$ be a small map. Let $D$ be a big divisor on $D$. Then for $m >>0$ the map $\phi_{mD}:Y\dashrightarrow Z$, induced by $mD$ is birational. Now, if $\Delta:=f^{*}D$, then the map induced by $m\Delta$ is $\phi_{mD}\circ f$, which is birational as well. Therefore $\Delta$ is big. We conclude that $D$ is big if and only if $\Delta$ is big. In particular $-K_Y$ is big if and only if $-K_X$ is big.

By Corollary 2.2.7. in Lazarsfeld, "Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I", a divisor $D$ is big if and only if there exists an ample divisor $A$ and a positive integer $m$ such that $mD = A+N$, where $N$ is effective. Therefore $-(-D+\frac{1}{m}N) = \frac{1}{m}A$. In you case $D = -K_Y$ and you get that $-(K_Y+\frac{1}{m}N) = \frac{1}{m}A$ is ample.