"Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops, like bishops, and your religious act like religious." - Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, 1972

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

APURON'S 1987 LETTER FORESHADOWED 2016 EVENTS.

Created by Bob

Haidee Eugenio's story in the November 28 Pacific Daily News entitled FALL OF AN ARCHBISHOP contained the rather prescient quote:

In 1987, Apuron wrote a letter asking a judge for leniency for a former Agat altar boy who had pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a 2-year-old. A Pacific Daily News article at the time said the man told the judge he took the girl to the beach and committed the crime, and police later found her blood-stained underwear at his workplace.

But the archbishop said the evidence in the case was weak.

“Apparently, he seemed to be tied in coincidentally based on the fact that he was accused to have been the last person to have been with her that particular day,” Apuron wrote. He described the man as “one of the faithful altar boys” from the village."

Thus almost thirty years ago apuron's actions foreshadowed news reports of this year involving sex crimes committed on children, a beach, altar boys, apuron and attempts to rationalize the irrational.Thirty years ago could apuron have been aware of the shibboleth his supporters would mumble in his defense: "A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law" as though it were some kind of sacred mantra, even though the slogan has been debunked on this website a couple times? here and here

Students of apuronology, i.e. the irrational defense of apuron, apparently missed the foreshadowing and have overlooked the apuron corollary to "the rule of guilt and innocence." When constructed the rule reads:

A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law unless the person was an altar boy who apuron likes. If so, the finding of guilt is suspect because apuron can find that the evidence was weak.