The tornado’s winds were so strong they registered only as garbled numbers on the radar. But storm chasers were calling in reports of a large wedge tornado, so Umscheid knew what those radar images meant.

A sense of dread wrestled with awe as the tornado marched on, showing no signs of weakening.

“It’s just nature’s wonder unfolding right in front of your eyes,” Umscheid said. “At the same time, it’s devastating if there’s something directly in its path.”

There was: Greensburg.

Umscheid issued a “tornado emergency” for the town of 1,383 people at 9:41 p.m. on May 4, 2007, which said, in part, “a violent tornado was on a direct path for portions of Greensburg.”

Residents of Greensburg had nearly 30 minutes to get to shelter, thanks to the tornado warning issued and sirens that blared until the tornado knocked out the town’s electricity.

“I think we would have had 240 deaths in Greensburg if the warning system did not exist that night,” AccuWeather senior vice president Mike Smith said. “Fortunately, it did exist.”

Greensburg, officials say, was an example of how many lives can be saved when warnings are issued and residents respond appropriately. The proliferation of smartphones, refined warning language and more sophisticated radar all offer the potential for better and timelier warnings when tornadoes threaten.

Data collected by the weather service shows that in 2011, warnings were issued beforehand for 75 percent of the tornadoes that formed. In 2015, the most recent year for which statistics were available, that rate was 58 percent.

In 2011, the weather service was able to give an average of 15 minutes’ advance warning before a tornado touched down for the first time or caused damage. By 2015, the figure was eight minutes.

Studies are underway to find out why those numbers have fallen and what can be done to improve them, said Brad Ketcham, a meteorologist with the Wichita branch of the weather service.

The technology exists to make warnings more effective and timely, Ketcham and other forecasters say. Radar upgrades mean forecasters can see fresh scans of the atmosphere within a minute or two.

Current dual-polarization radar is “leaps and bounds better than what we’ve ever had,” Umscheid said. “It’s just amazing what we could see with Greensburg if we had that scanning strategy then.”

In 2007, the weather service radar in Dodge City completed scans of the atmosphere every four to five minutes.

“The sinking feeling hit . when it was directly south of Greensburg,” Umsheid said of the tornado. “That was the longest four minutes of my career.”

Umscheid and other meteorologists hoped that the tornado would veer just to the southeast of town. But the next scan showed the tornado signature northwest of the town.

“The signature (on radar) was still intense,” and the line between the two most recent locations took it right through Greensburg, he said.

The Greensburg tornado was one of 22 produced by the same supercell thunderstorm. Some of the tornadoes were among the strongest ever recorded.

Greensburg was the first tornado ever rated EF-5 on the Enhanced Fujita scale, which measures tornado strength based on damage. Top winds exceeded 200 mph.

“The way that tornadoes evolve, they have this left hook at the end,” Umscheid said. “That’s a lot of times when they are at their strongest.

The Greensburg tornado “was left hooking right through town,” he said.

What’s remarkable, Umscheid and other weather researchers have said, is that the Trousdale and Hopewell tornadoes later in the evening from the same supercell were almost certainly stronger than the tornado that flattened Greensburg.

“With the Trousdale tornado, the radar display was even more dramatic” than with Greensburg, Umscheid said.

Other tornadoes that night were satellites that accompanied the larger tornadoes. At one point, two sizable tornadoes were on the ground at the same time in Barton County, moving parallel to each other.

“The one question we’re still trying to unravel is ‘Why just that one massive supercell and almost nothing else?’ ” Umscheid asked.

Forecasting models indicated conditions might produce two or three thunderstorms capable of producing a short-lived tornado, not an epic outbreak that would kill 13 people.

The Greensburg tornado killed 11 people, the Trousdale tornado killed one, a World War II veteran, and the Hopewell tornado killed one, a Stafford County sheriff’s deputy.

The Greensburg death toll could easily have been much higher, weather officials say, because it was a huge tornado hitting a town late at night.

The deadliest tornado in Kansas history hit an unsuspecting Udall after sunset on May 25, 1955, killing 77 people in Udall and another five outside the small Cowley County town.

More than 50 years later, Greensburg and Udall share the distinction of being virtually swept off the map by large, night-time tornadoes. Even more remarkably, Smith’s research showed that the Udall and Greensburg tornadoes were nearly identical.

Both tornadoes had sustained winds in excess of 200 mph.

Both destroyed 95 percent of the town they struck and damaged the remaining 5 percent.

Both traveled north, rather than the usual southwest-to-northeast track.

Both were extremely difficult to see because they were wrapped in rain and hail at night.

The radar echoes of the supercell thunderstorm complexes that produced the Udall and Greensburg tornadoes are so similar that when Smith put maps of the two atop each other, they looked like virtual copies.

The two monstrous tornadoes differed in a couple of ways: Greensburg was larger - 1.75 miles wide to Udall’s 1.5 miles wide.

While the Greensburg tornado had the left hook in its track that curled it to the northwest, the Udall tornado did not.

“It’s a little bit unusual to get that big that far west in Kansas,” Larry Ruthi, meteorologist-in-charge of the Dodge City branch of the weather service, said of the Greensburg tornado. “But everything you’d want to see for an explosive tornado environment was there. Everything came together perfectly.”

Days like May 4, 2007, show that even slight risks for severe weather need to be taken seriously, forecasters say.