Obviously the author thought this comment – “At least they didn’t use a 911…” – rather humourous. It’s not that funny, at all, if you own a 924S/944/968 – very unprofessional of you to post a remark like this.

Hmmmm. Here we were worrying we might possibly anger readers about a jab at someone else’s belief system. Never occurred to us we might offend owners of three of the many non 911 Porsche variants. So, while we’re at it, let’s not leave out 928, Panamera, Cayenne, 914, 356 and 912 owners. I’m sure they are possibly offended as well.

I was going to tease you about dissing us poor 944 owners, but I see some hackles have been raised. All in good fun. BTW, there are some articles on this site where a 944 owner takes a good-natured shot at the 911 crowd.

Besides, if the world is going to end, you want to be riding in the most well-balanced Porsche out there!

With the Boxster and Cayman, it’s almost as if Porsche decided to take a page from the BMW playbook. Car and Driver has even made the two variants a perennial 10Best selection (Although I tend to take the perennial Accord-over-Camry pick with a grain of salt).

You guys know this car was prepped to race in the 24 hours of LeMons, right? This isn’t the work of a religious group at all. Should a 911 be damaged and/or depreciated enough to qualify for a LeMons race, I’d like to think its driving team would have just as much fun with their paint scheme.

@ 993C4S Linking to some LeMons photos of the car in action may assuage further misinterpretation.

@ Ted Buddy, do what I do; get on the track and show them what’s what! You’ll forget all about this mean ol’ post when you’re passing 911s worth 2, 3, 5 times what you paid for your fine front-engine Porsche.