District 4 City Council RACE

1. Should the LENS come to a referendum, will you
support voting to stop the project?

2. Do you support closing the
Pier?

3. Will you move to end the red
light camera program?

4. Do you support the Rays
talking to anyone in Pinellas County or Hillsborough County about a stadium
site?

5. Do you support the
neighborhood association concept and what will you do to specifically help
rebuild this City asset?

6. Do you support hiring a new
Police Chief?

7. What specifically what will
you do to begin to reduce crime and improve the quality of life in South St.
Pete?

As candidates responded to Comments section of the Post has
become long and a bit difficult to follow; so I have set up a Post for each
race and copied, with no editing,
the candidate's responses to date.

Candidates who have not responded, may add them in the Comments
section or e-mail them to me and I will add those comments with no editingto the Body of the Post.

Dr.
David McKalip

1. Should the LENS come to a referendum, will you support voting
to stop the project?

When the “Stop the Lens” referendum is on the ballot, I will vote
to Stop the Lens. I have also called for City Council to stop spending on the
Lens architect until the voters have spoken. My opponent so far has refused to
make a public call for the same, despite my challenge to do so. It is easy to
say “let the voters decide”, but it takes courage and leadership to tell people
how you will vote and to work for better policy on the pier and responsible
actions on spending until that vote is done. That is what I have done. Read my
press release on the matter at http://tinyurl.com/cy8ytry
or the “News section” of www.McKalipforCouncil.com.
Dr. David McKalip for St. Petersburg City Council.

2. Do you support closing the Pier?

I support leaving the Pier open until the vote on the “Stop the
Lens” referendum. More importantly, I am offering an innovative approach to rebuild
the pier if the Lens is stopped. The Lens can be converted from an entity that
consumes a $1.4 million annual taxpayer subsidy to one that that actually pays
taxes and provides a venue and destination people will want. The more than $50
million cost of rebuilding the Pier can be borne entirely by a Private entity
with NOT A DIME OF TAXPAYER MONEY. To do this, I have offered a “NO COST PIER
SOLUTION” that would be accomplished by leasing the Pier to a private company
that would bid to build it to City Specifications and that would ensure open
access to all. Read more on this at my website at: http://www.mckalipforcouncil.com/no_cost_pier_solution
Dr. David McKalip for St. Petersburg City Council.

3. Will you move to end the red light camera program?

I will work hard to stop the red light camera program. I will
work to stop expansion if I can’t get the votes to stop it. I will work to
extend yellow light times if I can’t stop expansion. I will hold up other less
important votes until the Red light cameras are banned from our city. These
cameras have increased auto accidents and are nothing more than a money-making
scheme by a government that refuses to cut spending. I have been analyzing and
speaking up against red light cameras when it was not popular to do so unlike
my opponent who remained silent at they were implemented. My opponent will not
work in the way I will work to stop Red light cameras. Read about my activism
against red light cameras at my blog: http://sunbeamtimes.com/2012/12/13/crashes-caused-by-red-light-cameras-hidden-since-may-2012-in-st-petersburg.aspx
Dr. David McKalip for St. Petersburg City Council

4. Do you support the Rays talking to anyone in Pinellas County
or Hillsborough County about a stadium site?

The Rays should be able to talk about other sites IF AND ONLY IF,
they agree to an addendum to remove their annual $1.4 million taxpayer subsidy
from the city. They should also agree pay the full ANNUAL cost of the 30,000
hours (!!) of overtime that our City Police spend directing traffic for the
Rays! I stood up with Councilman Gerdes agreeing with his proposal to amend the
contract to allow the Rays to look elsewhere IF they agree to have no subsidy.
I did not see my opponent doing the same. They Rays can have a new stadium in
St. Petersburg if they pay their own way. The taxpayers can’t afford it any
longer but the Rays can. However, I will not allow the Rays to do anything to
get off the hook for the enormous costs they owe the City if they try to renege
on their contract and leave early. Dr. David McKalip for St. Petersburg City
Council

5. Do you support the neighborhood association concept and what
will you do to specifically help rebuild this City asset?

A key part of my campaign is to help build a “Community of
Neighbors”, not a community dependent on government. Neighborhood associations
are vital and valuable asset for our city. We should encourage their growth by
ensuring that each neighborhood has a relationship with the Police and Fire
department. Out city should rapidly and properly respond to neighborhood representatives
that report crime, streets in need of repair, issues with vagrants, sanitation
and water issues and the like. I have worked hard in my own Neighborhood to
facilitate traffic calming, help to design a neighborhood disaster plan for
hurricanes or terrorist events and by supporting our local crime watch. I would
also ask the Neighborhood association to focus on more bread and butter
neighborhood issues rather than ask the city to push social and political
agendas. I also would establish a program to allow people to get tax rebates,
free passes for Golf, Rays Games (and more!) and forgiven fines and parking
tickets if they volunteer time in their community. This “Good Neighbor Reward
Program” is described on my website and would help us build a Community of
Neighbors. People helping each other one-on-one will serve our city better. http://www.mckalipforcouncil.com/a_community_of_neighbors.
Dr. David McKalip for St. Petersburg City Council

6. Do you support hiring a new Police Chief?

This question is difficult to answer as it is so broad. It would
be irresponsible for any candidate that has not been intimately involved in the
management of the City to comment on whether the Police Chief should be
replaced since that would rely mainly on politics. It is clear however that
reform is needed in the police department from a number of perspectives with
the most important being spending. The Citizens of St. Petersburg need tax
relief – a family of four now pays an EXTRA $1,500 per year for the cost of St.
Pete City government than it did in 2001 (with 365 fewere workers and 3,500
fewere residents)! While the Police department wouldn’t be the main or first
place to find savings, there are opportunities for savings there. We need to
support responsible efforts to consolidate the call center if it can improve
and not jeopardize public safety. While we need a new police station, it should
be affordable to the citizens of St. Petersburg and the City Council should
evaluate it critically. We have a high quality, brave and loyal police force
and they deserve our respect and support. But they must also ensure that as
they engage in their police work that citizens are protected from things like
high speed chases and shooting at moving vehicles (which is against city policy
and happened recently).

PART I Answer to
Q7. What specifically what will you do to begin to reduce crime and improve the
quality of life in South St. Pete?

There is no easy way to reduce crime ANYWHERE, not just in South
St. Pete which should not be considered a “separate city” but part of the
entire community. Crime can decrease naturally as a result of prosperity,
freedom and opportunity. For too long the City Council has acted like THEY were
the source of the “quality of life” of citizens. This is wrong thinking and it
turns out that government “solutions” often cause more problems. The people of
St. Petersburg, including South St. Pete, are capable of great things if we
allow them to work on their own problems peacefully. But look at what happened
with the Sweetbay grocery. The grand visions of a government created grocery
store disappeared when the Federal money dried up, but not without harming
smaller businesses in the neighborhood (http://tinyurl.com/c9ewgn5).
The city has also bought up empty lots with government money and harmed
property values (http://tinyurl.com/csgdtev). At
one point the put in a house made out of a metal shipping container from a
freighter on 13th Ave. S. only to have to spend more money to tear it down (and
never checked with the local neighborhood first)!

PART II Answer to
Q7. What specifically what will you do to begin to reduce crime and improve the
quality of life in South St. Pete?

If we treat people with respect and STOP PANDERING to them, they
will solve their own problems. However they need a stronger police presence.
Neighbors need support from the City when they are trying to drive drug dealers
out. They need to know that we will have their back if they help the city clean
out crime and we will have their back when they do the right thing. My “Good
Neighbor Reward Program” would also help us build a community of neighbors by
sending the message that it is one-on-one help that will rebuild communities,
not another government program. This program would reward citizens for tutoring
kids, adopting a rehabilitated prisoner returning to society or helping a
single mom. We can’t “solve” decades of problems with more of the same failed
government solutions that have caused many of the problems to begin with. It is
time for a different course and I would help lead the way towards a community
of neighbors and a racially unified St. Petersburg by first FOCUSSING ON THE
COMMON VALUES shared by various communities: faith, family, freedom,
independence, personal ownership and economic empowerment. Learn more at www.McKalipForCouncil.com. Elect
Dr. David McKalip for St. Petersburg City Council!

Darden Rice:

The following response is from Darden Rice District 4 City
Council Candidate sent to me via an e-mail.

1. Should the LENS come to a referendum, will you support
voting to stop the project.

YES. It's time to hit the reset button and let the laboratory of
democracy settle this one. The City's handling of this project has left much to
be desired. I do worry about what a stopped process says about the City,
and I worry about a dragged out process leaving us with no options for a new
Pier. This is no way to run a City and the process has left the public divided
and distrustful of its leaders and city staff.

2. Do you support closing the Pier?

YES. The approach is structurally unsound. I do not support
continuing subsidies to keep a poorly managed concept going on life support. It
is not evident why there was such a rush to close it with a referendum right
around the corner, but the entire City process has been difficult to justify.

3. Will you move to end the red light camera program?

YES.

4. Do you support the Rays talking to anyone in Pinellas
County or Hillsborough County about a stadium site?

NO. Major League Baseball has decades of history of
undermining St. Pete and this is one of their typical tactics. I want the Rays
to stay and we should support them, and we have to be smart about our
protecting our contract agreement.

5. Do you support the neighborhood association concept and
what will you do to specifically help rebuild this City asset?

YES. See my website issue page, please.

6. Do you support hiring a new Police Chief?

YES. It's time for
someone new at the helm.

7. What specifically what will you do to begin to reduce crime
and improve the quality of life in South St. Pete?

Since no other questions are asked
about crime, except this particular question that specifically couples it with
only one section of the city, I find the premise of this question somewhat
troubling. I will make reducing a crime throughout the entire city a
priority without singling out any area or treating it differently. I
support community-based policing and the concept of a police professional that
has a responsibility to public service. I received the endorsement of the Sun
Coast PBA in this race.

As for issues related to the southside, I support creation of a Midtown
TIF district, supporting a Youth Advisory Council and Task Force, bringing in
another CHC (community health center) and the supporting Johnnie Ruth Clark
Health Center.

I support historical preservation efforts of buildings in midtown.

City support for southside cultural amenities should be on par with
support for other institutions. I support clear citywide goals that include
objectives for midtown as part of a 'seamless mentality.'

Furthermore, in my community work, I have always worked to
promote easy access to and participation in voting, expanded early vote
locations and hours, and voting right restoration.

For more information about my views, please
see the issues page on my website.

Carolyn Fries

1. Should the LENS come to a referendum, will you support voting
to stop the project?

Yes. I will vote in favor of cancelling the contract with Michael
Maltzan, confident that we can together come up with a comprehensive waterfront
plan that is affordable for St. Petersburg’s people. I believe a city must be
progressive to be successful, but should also listen to the will of the people
and take into account the current economic conditions when making decisions.
St. Petersburg has had and ideally should have a pier, but can its people
afford to pay for it in today’s economy? What other city services will suffer
as a result of the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Funds being dedicated to this
project? While Tax Increment Financing (the means by which any improvement to
the pier would be paid for) may not directly raise taxes, there is a definite
impact on future tax revenues. To the public: before making your own decision
and casting your vote, please take some time to research how Tax Increment
Financing works. Also visit http://www.thenewstpetepier.com,
http://www.wowstpete.com and http://www.stopthelens.com for information from both sides
regarding The Lens design. And, as always, feel free to contact me if you’d
like to talk more about it.

2. Do you support closing the Pier?

Yes. While one could argue the pier could safely remain open for
a few more years beyond the May 31, 2013 date, a decision to close it has been
made and retailers and restaurants have taken action to move their businesses.
If elected, I would not take any action to reopen the Pier or halt its
demolition. The inverted pyramid approach and head have been determined to be
near the end of their useful life. It is impossible to predict exactly when the
structure will become a danger to users. Closing the pier is the best and only
option to avoid risk to human life.

3. Will you move to end the red light camera program?

Yes. Given the opportunity, I would vote to eliminate red light
cameras in St. Petersburg. Citations are assigned to the car, not the driver.
Inconsistent modes and timing of traffic signals throughout the city make it
such that a driver’s (same) behavior may be acceptable at one intersection and
result in a citation at another. The process to appeal a citation is broken. However,
the easy answer is for people to make sure they stop short of the line before
the light turns red. Then the problem will resolve itself.

4. Do you support the Rays talking to anyone in Pinellas County
or Hillsborough County about a stadium site?

No, the Rays should remain at Tropicana Field until the end of
their lease. Aside from the potential for a new stadium at another site, which
would serve primarily to increase the team’s value for its owners, I do not see
any benefit to the Rays moving elsewhere in Tampa Bay. Tampa Bay families are
struggling in today’s economy and should not be forced to pay for a new
stadium, especially when the current lease agreement at Tropicana Field does
not expire until 2027. All that said, the Rays are one of many amenities that,
when combined, make St. Petersburg Florida’s best city and I want them to
remain here and be successful. Their idea to build a future fan base by
focusing on children today is brilliant (look at what Apple did by donating
computers to schools). I look forward to the opportunity for collaboration with
community leaders and the Rays toward identifying creative solutions that best
achieve common goals of the people of St. Petersburg and their team.

5. Do you support the neighborhood association concept and what
will you do to specifically help rebuild this City asset?

Yes, I support the neighborhood association concept. I was
Treasurer of the Crescent Lake Neighborhood Association in 2006 and it’s
President in 2007 & 2008. We had an active board that worked well together
and membership rose by more than three times-from around 30 to over 100-during
my involvement. We held porch & block parties, Easter egg hunts, 4th of
July in the park, annual fall harvest festivals and luminary walks. We also
implemented traffic calming on 5th & 7th Streets and spearheaded the
restoration of Crescent Lake leading to a group called The Friends of Crescent
Lake who still maintain the lake plantings today. I completed the CONA
leadership program in 2008 and am part of the Leadership St. Pete Class of
2013. As a city council member, I will use that experience to support District
4 neighborhoods by listening to and seeking residents’ input, helping them
resolve neighborhood issues, assisting dormant associations get started again
and regularly sharing news from the city council.

6. Do you support hiring a new Police Chief?

Personally, I have been satisfied with the performance of Chuck
Harmon and would be fine with him serving until retirement. However, if a Mayor
were elected that wanted to replace him at an earlier date, I would not oppose
the Mayor’s decision.

7. What specifically what will you do to begin to reduce crime
and improve the quality of life in South St. Pete?

I would focus on the children of South St. Petersburg because
they are the future. Children are amazingly resilient and can accomplish great
things when given the opportunity. I served as Treasurer/President of the John
Hopkins Middle School PTSA in 2009-10 and it’s President in 2010-11. During
2010-11 we had 150 JHOP students participate in the fall fundraiser, selling
over $17,000 of cookie dough, a 2x+ increase from the previous year. The
profits were used for teacher supplies, the theater program, drum corps
uniforms, student awards, and the 8th grade dance, among other things. While I
still need to approach and obtain support from all the parties involved, I hope
to work with the school administrators, teachers, PTA/SAC groups, the city and
the business community to actively engage children (and their parents) in
projects to improve their schools and/or neighborhoods. The process of project
identification and selection, fundraising and execution would serve as a
valuable learning experience, provide a sense of accomplishment and instill
pride in their community.