It's not just the remainers from one side that have undermined our position. Remainers from Labour, Tory, Libdem and remainers from other political groups have been on a constant anti brexit diatribe. Labour have been making promises they will vote down any deal that doesn't meet their 6 red lines, in a Sunday tv interview he couldn't even tell them what those red lines are! One of them is.....Does it deliver the “exact same benefits” as we currently have as members of the Single Market and Customs Union? so we know straightaway they'll vote any deal down because we can't have the exact same benefits without choosing to remain

Then there's Vince Cable and Tony Blair and their mission to stop Brexit by any means. All they are doing is giving the EU strength, telling them that Parliament will refuse anything unless it's remain as the majority of MP's are remainers never mind how their constituency voted.

Do you really believe that our nice European friends expect everybody in the UK to hold the exact same view ?

As I’ve said earlier if you can be bothered to read. I said the phrase war was used as an example of the only other time the political parties were united for the good of the country. If there was another example I’d use it.

In the lead up to the referendum there were members of both parties standing side by side putting their views across to leave or remain. What I’m getting at is the leave side of both parties should have got together. But no we’ve May who’s pretending to want to leave on one side a lifetime hater of the EU pretending that he wants to stay on Momentum’s orders no doubt. All Corbyn does is snipe remarks this government this this government that we’re a government in waiting blah blah blah. He has no idea what to do all he cares about is getting into power so the alt left can completely screw this country over.

As I’ve said earlier if you can be bothered to read. I said the phrase war was used as an example of the only other time the political parties were united for the good of the country. If there was another example I’d use it.

In the lead up to the referendum there were members of both parties standing side by side putting their views across to leave or remain. What I’m getting at is the leave side of both parties should have got together. But no we’ve May who’s pretending to want to leave on one side a lifetime hater of the EU pretending that he wants to stay on Momentum’s orders no doubt. All Corbyn does is snipe remarks this government this this government that we’re a government in waiting blah blah blah. He has no idea what to do all he cares about is getting into power so the alt left can completely screw this country over.

Party politics has no place in Brexit

IT WAS PARTY POLITICS THAT BROUGHT US BREXIT...OR TO BE MORE PRECISE A TORY CIVIL WAR BROUGHT US BREXIT.

It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan

IT WAS PARTY POLITICS THAT BROUGHT US BREXIT...OR TO BE MORE PRECISE A TORY CIVIL WAR BROUGHT US BREXIT.

I think the Tories were responding to a demand; it's pretty well accepted that they wanted to cut off UKIP as they were worried by their gains. So it's more that Farage and the media that brought us Brexit. The tories historically have just fought over it internally but always presented pro-EU manifestos. The media changed that game, and it goes back a long way, to at least the Sun bendy bananas bolox in 1994. 14+ years of aggressive campaigning to turn people against the EU (may have gone on before, but that's when I first remember it going mainstream).

From 1994:

Farage fed on the growing resentment created by the media. Cameron panicked and the rest is history.

Despite the regurgitated media lies, people's understanding of what the EU does and our role remains pretty non-existent.

Quick to dismiss a condition of the vote that the leader of the country insisted on yet won’t let the £350m on a bus bullshit go.

Cameron did say that in interviews but then his government also published their booklet saying that it wasn't clear what the future relationship would look like. So which version of him do you believe?

Cameron did say that in interviews but then his government also published their booklet saying that it wasn't clear what the future relationship would look like. So which version of him do you believe?

A feckin mess, the whole thing from start to finish.

Saying it wasn't clear was just a fudge on his part. He had failed to negotiate any changes, he went out with a wish list and came back with next to nothing and told us we'd won something. ironically, the real change was in the EU's "ever closer union" in which the EU agreed that motto would no longer apply to the UK and we were not included in or committed to further politicial integration. If Cameron agreed to us effectively being politically sidelined, how is it in our interests to stay in? What influence do we have, did we have as soon as they agreed that? Why would they ask our opinion on things which we weren't included in? As soon as the leave vote came in people claimed we were sidelined but it had already happened.

Cameron did say that in interviews but then his government also published their booklet saying that it wasn't clear what the future relationship would look like. So which version of him do you believe?

A feckin mess, the whole thing from start to finish.

It also states that at the point of publishing, the Canada deal was seven years in the making and still not complete. Yet there were people on the leave side saying this would be the easiest deal to strike and that the Irish border was a non-issue.

One thing to think about at all times: the UK net contribution to the EU budget is less than 0.5 per cent of British GDP. You know half of 1 per cent. As small as Trumps little hands.

Our European friends are very nice people.

Yes it's all about our net contributions eh. If we had concerns about industry leaving our country, about immigration, welfare, the NHS and crime, if we worried about political interference by an unelected Commission and President....if we had all that and more maybe we'd have a valid argument.

Yes it's all about our net contributions eh. If we had concerns about industry leaving our country, about immigration, welfare, the NHS and crime, if we worried about political interference by an unelected Commission and President....if we had all that and more maybe we'd have a valid argument.

If you had concerns about industry leaving the country you should have voted Remain. Airbus, Mini, Honda, Nissan etc. Welfare cuts - well hardly the EU's decision to reform disability benefits and introduce universal benefits.. The NHS would be in even more dire straights without the contribution of nurses and doctors from the EU. Crime? I thought the biggest issue last year was knife crime in the big cities. Surely the EU isn't responsible for that too? Which leaves us with immigration. I will admit there are a lot of East Europeans working in the hotel and catering industry but I always think that the service they provide is excellent.