Post navigation

As well as the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and emails, Russia also successfully hacked campaigns and emails from the Republican National Committee (RNC) during last year’s presidential election, according to FBI director James Comey, the heads of National Intelligence, the CIA and the NSA.

However, those hacks didn’t extend to Donald Trump’s campaign, he told the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday, nor against the current RNC.

“There were successful penetrations of some groups and campaigns – particularly on the state level on the Republican side of the aisle,” said Comey during his testimony.

This report adds that the RNC hacking was different to that at the DNC: the RNC data was mainly from state-level campaigns and obsolete email addresses, long abandoned. By contrast, the DNC data hacked was current and obtained from the emails of top DNC members. In addition, the information from the RNC was never released by the Russian hackers, while the DNC information was widely disseminated to sources including WikiLeaks.

“There was evidence of hacking directed at state-level organizations, state-level campaigns, and the RNC, but old domains of the RNC, meaning old emails they weren’t using,” Comey said during his testimony. “None of that was released.”

The reason for this difference, according to the report: Russian hackers used similar tactics to infiltrate the RNC and DNC, but had much better success with the DNC. The DNC and RNC had different defensive measures in place, and the RNC’s measures may have been more effective in fending off the attempted hacks.

On Sunday, Trump’s chief-of-staff Reince Priebus said that the president-elect is “not denying that entities in Russia were behind this particular hacking campaign,” specifically referring to the DNC hacks. He added that during his presidential tenure, Trump may take additional actions against Russia in retaliation for their interference.

This statement came after months of pressure, especially from Senate Democrats, for US intelligence to investigate and publicly testify to any possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The revelations that Russia directly tried to influence the election lead to punitive action by President Obama, including sanctions against Russian intelligence agencies. Russia has denied these allegations.

3 comments on “Russia ‘also hacked RNC’ – but not Trump’s campaign”

I’m still waiting to see the evidence. The government shouldn’t be able to just say it and I trust their word.
And, how can I be assured (as a US citizen) that it was the Russian GOVERMENT that did the hacking? I fought for years against hackers in Russia and China. But, despite the extensive resources my company then had, there’s no way we could be sure it was the government. Governments go through a great deal of effort to make their hacking attempts not be traceable back to that government. While I’m sure they fail, can we really trust that a “mistake” they make (which allows us to pin it on them) isn’t planned (by non-governmental hackers)?
Proving either piece of the story above is no simple matter.

Your company had no human intelligence and insignificant resources compared to the US gov’t intelligence organization. Not trusting the government is a good idea… I’m all for healthy skepticism. But the reality is that what Russia did is just not that hard, and it’s reasonable to expect that they would invest modest sums to promote their interest. Sticking your head in the sand is not going to work here…

I assume the evidence would be reams and reams of computer network logs. 99.9% of folks wouldn’t know what they were looking at, and those of us who do it for our jobs know how completely boring it would be. Anyhow, these logs are text, and we wouldn’t be able to tell the difference at a glance between a log and an edited version of a log, so unless we’re actually the ones doing the research, there is no presentable evidence that could convince us.

I actually believe the (more in depth than this) reports I’ve read about the hacking. It’s not a hard thing for intelligence agencies to do, and I imagine that every country of note is spying on every other country.