Audit materiality : a comparative analysis between normative principles and professional standards

Abstract:

Audit materiality is a fundamental concept of the external audit process. Guidelines issued by professional standard-setting bodies generally state that the determination of audit materiality is primarily a matter of professional judgement. Over emphasizing professional judgement as predominate guideline might be an attempt to advance and maintain so-called uncertain professional knowledge. This paper examines the proposition that in respect of determining materiality during the audit of company annual financial statements, professional auditing standards suggest the preference of standard-setting bodies not to provide concrete guidelines to the extent it is possible. It does so by means of a comparative analysis between normative principles regarding the determination of audit materiality and the corresponding professional standards. The results provide sufficient evidence to support the research proposition. Audit materiality standards presently have two major shortcomings, namely: over emphasizing the exercise of professional judgement and providing for various alternatives, while normative principles favour a specific approach.

Related items

The purpose of this study was to indentify collective skills and background that audit committee members must have in order to be effective. In addition, the study examined the extent of prevalence of each skill indentified, ...

Very little information is available on the income patterns of individual audit firms in South Africa. There is no statutory requirement for audit firms to disclose any information in respect of its own activities. This ...

The audit expectation gap has been the subject of many research projects in overseas countries. Recommendations and strategies for narrowing the gap in these countries have been based on empirical data. In the Republic of ...