Brussels to argue for 30% CO2 reduction target

The economic slump has cut the cost of meeting the EU's current 2020 emission reduction target by nearly a third, making a move to a 30% cut affordable, according to a draft European Commission communication seen by EurActiv.

The cost of cutting emissions by 20% by 2020 has dropped by some €22bn per year from what was estimated in 2008, when climate and energy legislation to reach the target was agreed, the document notes.

It now stands at €48bn per year in 2020, compared to an estimate of €70bn three years ago.

The European Commission is calling for increased ambition in EU climate legislation, without which it warns that Europe risks losing out to the US and China in the race for green jobs.

The Commission notes that the potential of the EU's flagship climate instrument, the emissions trading scheme (EU ETS), to spur low-carbon investment has been "severely affected for a long time". It argues that to deliver an allowance price of €30 per tonne of CO2 as originally planned would require a move to 30%.

The EU executive estimates that the additional cost of upgrading the target to 30% would stand at €33 billion in 2020. This brings the total cost of a more ambitious climate policy to €81bn, or 0.54% of GDP, which is €11bn higher than what EU governments had originally agreed to.

The additional investment could be offset by air quality improvements alone, which would save the EU some €6.5-€10bn in healthcare bills and reduce the need to control other pollutants, the paper states.

In addition, the EU could prevent stranded investments, for example in coal-based electricity generation, and eliminate the need for steeper and more expensive cuts later on.

EU member states are divided on stepping up the targets. Countries like the UK and the Netherlands would like to see a move to 30%, but are encountering fierce opposition from others, like Italy and Poland.

Action required

Moving to a 30% reduction target would require adjustments both within the EU ETS and in sectors outside of it, such as agriculture and transport.

The EU ETS could be brought in line with the new target by setting aside 1.4 billion allowances in the third trading period between 2013 and 2020, the document says.

Outside of the system, the Commission is proposing to implement an EU-wide carbon tax, develop spending programmes to move towards a low-carbon society in the bloc's next long-term budget, and increase emission reduction targets for member states in the context of "effort sharing".

Commission to assess border tariffs

The Commission said it is evaluating the introduction of border measures that would require importers from countries with less stringent environmental laws to buy emission allowances to cover the carbon content of certain imported goods.

But while the draft proposal and an accompanying working document keep the option open, they warn that it would "trigger retaliatory measures" and "even hinder international negotiations" to agree on a successor to the Kyoto Protocol.

"Effective border measures, which cannot be circumvented, would be difficult to design, implement and enforce," the Commission argues.

The EU executive adds that it would be hard to define in detail the carbon content of each individual category of goods and "therefore the system could at best only be envisaged for a very limited number of standardised commodities, such as steel or cement".

"This should be the end of the border debate," said Sanjeev Kumar of think-tank E3G.

Kumar described the Commission's draft paper as a "good step forward," arguing that the best way to go about stepping up the EU's climate targets is fixing the ETS cap.

Background

The EU's climate and energy package, agreed in December 2008, lays down legislation to meet the bloc's binding goal to reduce emissions from 1990 levels by 20% by 2020.

However, as the global community is engaged in negotiations to agree a new climate treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012, the EU has pledged to increase its target to 30% if other countries make comparable commitments.

At the Copenhagen conference in December 2009, world leaders delivered an agreement that left Europeans disappointed, as it did not include binding commitments to cut greenhouse gas emissions (EurActiv 19/12/09).

The face-saving deal, dubbed the 'Copenhagen Accord', established a goal to keep global temperature rises below 2°C in order to avoid dangerous climate change.

In March 2010, the Commission presented its strategy to reinvigorate global negotiations after Copenhagen, promising to present an analysis by the summer of what it would take for Europe to move to a 30% reduction target (EurActiv 10/03/10).

Related Content

Abdullahi Majeed, the Maldives' Minister of State for Environment & Energy, fears that many island states will be wiped off the map, even if an ambitious agreement is reached at COP 21. EurActiv France reports .

"What role could the EU play to obtain a more successful outcome in Mexico [than in Copenhagen]?" asks Eberhard Rhein, a lecturer at the Mediterranean Academy for Diplomatic Studies in Malta, in a January post on Blogactiv.

Europe can increase its emissions reduction target if it finds ways to redirect funding from Western to Eastern European countries, which oppose the move to a more ambitious commitment to fight climate change, writes David Buchan from the Oxford Institute of Energy Studies.

The Durban summit marked a breakthrough in introducing a new phase of international climate policy and it was the EU that paved the way for the others to follow its ambitious climate strategy, writes Connie Hedegaard, European Commissioner for Climate Action.

Although the EU has been the driving force behind the 'two-degree target' in the global climate debate, it should scrap this goal and instead advocate more flexible benchmarks, writes Oliver Geden, senior research fellow at the Berlin-based German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), in an opinion piece sent exclusively to EurActiv.

Wind is already Europe's second most important source of renewable energy, but by 2050 it should be both economically and technically feasible for it to become the continent's primary source of overall energy, argues Eberhard Rhein.

Former Irish president Mary Robinson was named the UN special envoy to Africa’s Great Lakes region in March. In another capacity, she is campaigning for climate justice. Robinson tells EurActiv that peace, stability and sustainable development are not mutually exclusive.

The regulatory market economy dimension of climate change will affect European industry sectors much earlier than the environmental-climatic dimension, writes Eric Heymann in a 5 July research paper for Deutsche Bank.

The UN conference in Cancún next December needs to set the basis for a new climate change treaty in 2011, Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), told EurActiv in an exclusive interview.