Manuel Bouyer writes:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 12:46:59AM +1000, Simon Burge wrote:
> > That's the point - should there be an arbitary limit?
>
> Ok. Does anyone agree that there shoudln't be any limit ?
Would it make sense to print a warning about "ridiculously large"
numbers or something? (e.g. greater than some number)
I would hate to see a typo launch 1000+ nfsd processes.
Not that a warning is necessary or anything, just an idea.
-Andrew
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Gillham | NetBSD ist Affengeil.
gillham@whirlpool.com | Nachts ist es kaelter
I speak for myself, not for my employer. | als draussen.