Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.

Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.

Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.

Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.

They have Halak lol

Exactly haha.

uh no, they got Halak. He's perfect for Hitchcock style hockey. I will say the same thing, we will agree to disagree.

Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.

They have Halak lol

Exactly haha.

uh no, they got Halak. He's perfect for Hitchcock style hockey. I will say the same thing, we will agree to disagree.

I meant before Hitch took over people were crapping all over St. Louis's goalie situation.