28 February 2013

RFK OK’d Sabotage Against Cuba in November 1963; Overruled by JFK

Ever
since the Church Committee’s investigation of the intelligence
community in the mid-1970s—if not earlier—it has been well known that
Robert F. Kennedy was deeply involved in the Kennedy
administration’s efforts to subvert and overthrow the regime of Fidel
Castro. RFK regularly attended meetings of the so-called
Special Group of the National Security Council, which directed and
coordinated US policy toward Cuba, including most covert operations. And
as Harris Wofford observed in his 1980 book, Of Kennedys and Kings, within the Special Group the attorney general

was
the driving force behind the clandestine effort to overthrow Castro.
From inside accounts of the pressure he was putting on the CIA to “get
Castro,” he seemed like a wild man who was out-CIAing the CIA.

One of seven documents released by the National Archives in response to a Judicial Watchlawsuit, however, is an EYES ONLY memo that reveals Robert F. Kennedy personally signed off on a sabotage operation against Cuba in November 1963.

The November 1963 document
released to Judicial Watch is a brief, one-page proposal for a “low-key
sabotage operation” with the plan to be accomplished by a commando group on or about 8
November 1963. Using demolition charges and incendiaries, the commandos were
to destroy a pier and warehouse on the northern coast “as part of our
continuing long-range program.”

Sterling J. Cottrell, the coordinator of Cuban affairs, submitted the sabotage proposal to Robert Kennedy on November 4. The next day, the operation was one of several items discussed at a special meeting of the Special Group (SG), which included RFK; McGeorge Bundy, the president’s national security adviser; John McCone, CIA director; Richard Helms, CIA deputy director for plans; U. Alexis Johnson, deputy undersecretary of State for political affairs; Cyrus Vance, secretary of the army; Dr. Albert “Bud” Wheelon, CIA deputy director for science & technology; Colonel Ralph Steakley of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and Bruce Cheever, deputy to Desmond FitzGerald, the head of the CIA’s Special Affairs Staff, which ran espionage, paramilitary, and other intelligence operations against Castro.

Cheever presented the proposal, which had been given the designation No. 3111, to the Special Group. The SG tentatively approved the operation along with two others: No. 3112, a sabotage operation directed against a sawmill located in northern Oriente province; and No. 3115, which involved the infiltration of a radio operator to provide communications for a “ratline,” an emergency escape route for Agency assets and agents in Cuba.

At the conclusion of the November 5 special meeting, Mac Bundy put all three operations in a “fail safe” status. They were to proceed as planned “pending concurrence in each case by higher authority”—meaning until the president himself signed off on them. The next day, however, President Kennedy disapproved all Cuban operations scheduled to run before November 12. Thus, only one of the three operations, No. 3115, received presidential sanction.

In the mid-1990s, the November 4 document was one of seven identified by the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) as “assassination-related” and contained in the papers of Robert F. Kennedy. But none of the seven were released, according to the ARRB, by the time it ceased operating in September 1998. Records in the RFK papers required the express permission of an RFK Donor Committee before they could be released. As of January 2011, according to an internal memo from the John F. Kennedy Library, the seven documents remained closed because the RFK Donor Committee “never formally ruled to open them.” However, after Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit it turned out that six of the documents were in fact open to the public because copies of them existed in files not controlled by the Donor Committee. They had already been released and were available in the JFK Assassination Records Collection at the NARA II facility in College Park, Maryland. Only the document cited above had not been made part of the Assassination Records collection.

The Judicial Watchlawsuit was filed subsequent to a December 2012 Freedom of Information Act request by Washington Decoded’s editor Max Holland. Upon notification that all seven documents were open to researchers, the lawsuit was dropped. Nonetheless, further steps are being taken to ensure the availability of all government records in the RFK papers that are related in any way to the JFK assassination.

Villanova Professor David M. Barrett, a member of Washington Decoded’s editorial board, provided the documents about what happened to proposed operation No. 3111.

Comments

i just finished reading Leak, and was compelled to write a note in praise of the book. It reflects a massive amount of research, and apparently total knowledge and assimilation of everything that has ever been written or said about the topic. I am very impressed with the quality and thoroughness of the research, not to mention your ability to weave all of the facts and sources into a fascinating story-even though I knew the conclusion before I began reading.

This is consistent with the self-aggrandizing myth that RFK and his followers managed to transmit to history. It's amazing to me how RFK's apologists have managed to make him look like a saint sent to recuse humanity when, in fact, he was a fairly ruthless political operator who had little scruples about interfering in other countries or doing anything else that he thought would advance his brother's agenda. For years, RFK himself and his followers perpetuated the myth that he, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, was the voice for moderation in dealing with Khrushchev. In fact, according to Sheldon Stern's recent book, THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS IN AMERICAN MEMORY-MYTHS AND REALITY, RFK was one of the leading hawks pushing for military action while it was JFK who decided on the less confrontational course of a quarantine. Somehow, RFK managed to transform his image after the assassination by ostensibly moving to the left, traveling through Appalachia, and attacking LBJ's policy on Viet Nam, conveniently ignoring the fact that RFK himself had some hand in the growing American involvement.