The Davies Hypothesis

Total Pageviews

Thursday, 1 October 2015

In my book, ‘Spiritual Man: An Introduction to
Negative Dimensions’, I try to explain one aspect of quantum weirdness, the
paradox of conjugate electrons. I did this by supposing that particles, in this
case, electrons, could be supposed to be a point object with two extra
dimensions apart from the ‘real’ one. The additional dimensions I describe as
the ‘unreal’ and the ‘imaginary’. By using these extra dimensions I showed that
outcome of each experiment was predictable; that by observing one electron’s
spin, the other would always be the opposite.

In my booklet, I show that by
introducing these extra dimensions we can unlock the mysteries of the universe,
its origin and properties, giving rise to explanations for amongst other
things, human behaviour. I also showed that the universe could be accurately
depicted as shown by the Dao symbol of Yin and Yang, the Taijitu.

This depiction shows the universe
to be a duality as described in the world’s first book of cosmology, Genesis
which states that in the beginning God created the heavens and earth. It also
corresponds to Plato’s picture of a ‘Phenominal’ and ‘Noumenal’ world, the
latter described by Emmanuel Kant as being ‘transcendental’.

The Taijitu clearly shows that
some of each part of the universe is manifest in the other and it is this, I
suggest, that gives rise to the mysteries of life. One such mystery, I submit,
is that of ‘quantum weirdness’. Many famous and successful scientists have been
disturbed by the implications of quantum theory, many happy to go along with it
as long as experiments continue to show no deviation from its predictions.
Nevertheless, many aspects leave scientists unhappy because this practice is a
departure from the normal empirical demands that underpin scientific work. None
more so than the premise that particles can be in two places at once, so let me
begin there.

If we say that a photon (P) can
be perceived as being a function of the ‘real’ photon (p), an ‘unreal’ photon
(-p) and an ‘imaginary’ photon (ip) where ‘i’ is the square root of minus one
then: P = f (p, -p, ip)

We can determine how we perceive
P by the following ( trinitarian) equation, incidentally, used by Michio Kaku
when introducing ‘hyperspace’ in his book of the same name:

P = ±√[p²
+ (-p)² + (ip) ²]

Solving
this we arrive at: P = ± p

In other words, by
introducing these extra dimensions we have, not only the ‘real’ photon we can
see and measure, but a second one that we cannot. Therefore, it is my
contention that when experimenters see one photon there is always another, not
always occupying the same space. We can use the same argument to demonstrate
that the ‘two slit’ experiment will also show a diffraction or interference
like pattern when experimenters believe they are firing single photons or
electrons. In practice, they are not because each particle has an ‘unreal’
counterpart, suggesting that there is no need of a particle/wave duality.

Similarly,
we might also explain some of the more obscure observations of the quantum era.
For instance could it be that the mortality (M) of Schrödinger’s cat can likewise be described in
terms of ‘m’ (alive), ‘-m’ (dead) and imaginary, ‘im’.

By the same argument, adopted above,
we can see that: M = ± m

In other words, the cat can be
either dead or alive.

In making these
assertions I should say that in normal life, these extra dimensions cancel each
other out and we are largely unaware of them. For this reason, science and
scientists are unwilling to look at them for fear of being seen as ridiculous. I
would therefore like to see some real scientists follow up these observations
to see if they explain some of the enigmas of science today.

My theory explains that
our dual universe emerges from the eternal and infinite ‘Pleroma’. This is the
perfect nothingness that arises from the ‘zero’ balance of the ‘real’ and
‘imaginary’ terms introduced above (Please see my book for details).

Since my book was
published I have considered that further to my brief incursion into quantum
effects, there maybe more I can say. In particular, I now believe that the
Pleroma now exists in every atom. Science today tells us that the space inside
an atom is a vacuum and as far as tests are concerned, perhaps it is. But I now
believe that it consists of the same material from which the universe itself
came from. I believe this because Nature hates zero as much as it hates a
vacuum. The taijitu teaches us that there is a part of our sister universe
within our own; probably manifest in the presence of dark matter and dark
energy but is there more?

What about subatomic
particles? If each quark is in reality accompanied by an ‘unreal’ version how
will this manifest itself? Will it explain better the fundamental forces of
nature and consign string theory to the scrapheap or will it provide the
impetus needed to find the ‘theory of everything’?

Over to you,
cosmologists, astrophysicists, particle physicists and other truth seekers.

Search This Blog

For all your professional video needs.

Video Synopsis

WELCOME

Hello & welcome to the Blog/Web pages of Kevill Davies, author of international best seller, 'APSARAS'.

On these pages we show current thoughts on a variety of topics

Information on all the books written by the author can be found plus links to the author's Manchester City blogsite and his website. This is being constructed to include travelogues and details of the mini golf games I have invented: 2-Ball Golf and Titan.