Saturday, November 5, 2016

Zadorov
affair: The Supreme Court persists in fraud, forgery…

Repeat
inquiry (fourth or fifth) was filed yesterday with Supreme Court
“Chief Clerk”, requesting duly signed and certified copies of
decision records in Zadorov’s case: Purported “Decision” by
Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, which denied access to inspect the
original paper decision records from Zadorov’s trial with under the
ruse of a “jumble” in the court file, and purported “Judgment”
by Justice Salim Joubran, which denied an appeal from such
“Decision”…

All
previous forgeries of decision records were committed by Mr Danny
Levy, staff member of the Office of the Clerk of no authority at all.
However, the latest series of falsified, fraudulent records were
produced under the name of “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul (a
pretender). The latest series is also characterized by the complex
fraud…

Roman
Zadorov is confined by the Israeli authorities for 10 years. The last
6 of them – as purported convict, who was purportedly found guilty
in the murder of 13 yo Tair Rada. However, following intensive
search, it is obvious by now that there is no valid judgment record
in his case. Attorney Feldman, who was his pro
bono counsel
in the appeal, wrote that the judgment record were lost in “the
wailing wind across the vast Jezreel Valley”…

The
fraud by judges of the Nazareth District Court and the Supreme Court
in the Zadorov affair are uniquely despicable. The case of the
Ukrainian Roman Zadorov in Israel is the mirror image of the Jewish
Mendel Beillis affair in the Ukraine a century ago!

Read
in blog:

Figures
1:Magistrate Gilead
Lubinsky, Justice Salim Joubran, “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul (a
pretender). There is no reasonable explanation for conduct of the
Supreme Court, except for fraud, which is aimed at withholding the
evidence of fraud by the Nazareth Court judges in the Zadorov
trial.
_____

OccupyTLV,
November 02 – repeat inquiry was filed yesterday with Supreme Court
“Chief Clerk” Idit Melul for obtaining duly signed and certified
copies of decisions in the Zadorov affair: [1]

a)June
02, 2016 “Decision” by Magistrate Gilead Lubinsky, under Zadorov
v State of Israel (7939/10), which denied access to inspect the
original paper decision records in State of Israel v Roman Zadorov
(502/07), with the reasoning of a “jumble” in the court file. That - when the law in Israel says that "any person is permitted to inspect decisions that tare not lawfully prohibited for publication", and the Supreme Court declared the right to inspect "a fundamental principle in any democratic regime... constitutional, supra-statutory..."

b) June 26, 2016 “Decision” and August 04,
2016 “Judgment” by Justice Salim Joubran, under Zernik v Zadorov
and State of Israel (4650/16), which denied an appeal from Magistrate
Lubinsky’s “Decision”.

Regardless of a series of requests for duly
signed and certified copies of such decision records, the Supreme
Court consistently provides only falsified, fraudulent records.
Previous forgeries of falsified decision records were perpetrated by
Mr Danny Levy of the Criminal Division, a staff member of no
authority at all to certify court records.

However, the latest series of forgeries, [2]
which
were received in response on a previous inquiry and request, [3]
were
perpetrated by Ms Idit Melul, “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court.
The latest series of forgeries is also characterized by the complex
pattern of fraud:

In response on Freedom of Information request
for documentation of Ms Idit Melul’s lawful appointment as “Chief
Clerk” of the Supreme Court, the Administration of Courts provided
invalid records.

In a previous meeting in Ms Melul’s office, she also refused to
answer: Under whose authority was she appointed “Chief Clerk” of
the Supreme Court?

Therefore, the previous inquiry contained a special article, which
asked for documentation of Ms Idit Melul – if she were to sign the
certification on behalf of the Supreme Court. Ms Melul provided
none.

Ms Idit Melul should be deemed a “Pretender”, falsely appearing
as “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court.

2. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul answered in a letter with no
reference number.

Such letter should be deemed an informal, off
the record document, or simply put – a “fabrication”.

3. “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul answered in
a lawfully unsigned letter.

The letter, which was received by mail, shows a “graphic signature”
instead of an authentic hand-signature. As explicitly clarified in
Ombudsman of the Judiciary Decision in the Judge Varda Alshech
“Fabricated Protocols” scandal, such record has no validity at
all. Varda Alshech and the Ombudsman were in full agreement that such
record was merely a “Draft”.

Figure
2: “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul September 08, 2016 response
letter was received by paper mail. The letter fails to be lawfully
signed by a hand signature. Instead, it bears an invalid “graphic
signature”. Ombudsman of the Judiciary Decision in the Judge Varda
Alshech “Frabricated Protocols” scandal makes it clear: Court
records, which are signed by “graphic signature” only are
invalid, merely ‘drafts’. _____

4. “Chief
Clerk” Idit Melul refused to provide a lawfully signed and
certified copy of Magistrate Lubinsky’s Decision, pertaining to the
“jumble” in Zadorov’s file, using an incredible ruse.

The
requests to inspect the original decision records in the trial paper
court file – State
of Israel v Roman Zadorov
(502/07) - was filed I the Supreme Court under the appeal court file
– Zadorov
v State of Israel
(7939/10) – since the Supreme Court held the Nazareth District
Court file at that time. Ms Idit Melul refused to provide a lawfully
signed and certified copy of Magistrate Lubinsky “Decision”,
which denied access to inspect the trial court file with the
reasoning of a “jumble” in the court file. Ms Idit Melul provide
an incredible ruse as the justification for her refusal:

Since you are not a party to criminal appeal
court file 7939/10, you would not be able to receive copies of any
decisions in the case.

According to such incredible ruse, Requester of
Inspection is not permitted to obtain a valid copy of the court
decision on his own request in the courts of the State of Israel…

The
August 16, 2016 request, which was filed with both the Supreme Court
(in the court file) and with “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul, explicitly
stated that the certified copies of the Supreme Court’s decision
records are required for filing outside the State of Israel (as an
appendix to the Complaint, which was filed with the UN Human Rights
Council – Working Group on Arbitrary Detention). Therefore, the
Supreme Court was asked to provide copies of its records, which would
be deemed pursuant to the Hague-Apostille Convention (1961).
According to the Convention, of which Israel is a party, valid copies
of court decision records must show the signature of the appropriate
judicial authority and certification, “True Copy of the Original”
by the Chief Clerk or Magistrate of the Court.

However,
the copies of Justice Salim Joubran’s “Decisions”, which were
provided by “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul, bear the certification,
“True Copy of the Original”, on copies that do not show Justice
Joubran’s signatures (Figures 3).

Figures
3: False certifications, “True Copy of the Original”, of
“Decision” and “Judgment” by Justice Salim Joubran in the
appeal Zernik v Zadorov and State of Israel (4650/10), which
were mailed by Supreme Court “Chief Clerk” Idit Melul. The appeal
in this court file originated in Supreme Court Magistrate Lubinsky’s
“Decision”, which denied access to inspect the original paper
decision records in Zadorov’s trial court file with the reasoning
of a “jumble” in the court file… The copies, which were mailed
by “Chief Clerk” Melul fail to show any signature by Justice
Salim Joubran. The request, which was filed with Ms Melul explicitly
stated that the certified record were required for filing outside the
State of Israel, as an appendix to Complaint, which was filed with
the UN Human Rights Council – Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.
Therefore, the request explicitly asked for copies that would be
deemed valid pursuant to the Hague-Apostille Convention (1961) –
showing signatures of the corresponding judges and certification by a
Chief Clerk or Magistrate of the Court.
_____

Roman
Zadorov: The poster child of fraud and “fabrications” by Israeli
judges

Roman
Zadorov has been confined by the Israeli authorities for 10 years, of
which the last 6 – as purported Tair Rada murder convict, who was
purportedly sentenced to life in prison. However, regardless of
intensive searches with Zadorov’s defense counsel and repeat
inspections in the Nazareth District Court and the Supreme Court –
no lawful, valid “Verdict” and “Sentencing” records have been
discovered to this date (Figure 4).

In
contrast with the decision records in the paper court file, the 2010
“Verdict” and “Sentencing” records were purportedly issued in
Net-HaMishpat case management system, following its implementation in
the Nazareth District Court in January 2010.

Attorney
Galil Spiegel, Zadorov’s defense counsel in the Nazareth District
Court trial, has not provided to this date a reasonable explanation
for the filing of unsigned judgment records with the Notice of Appeal
in the Supreme Court, and the loss of the valid, signed judgment
records, which purportedly were in her possession in 2010… [4]

Figure
4: Regardless of intensive
searches, no valid “Verdict of the Nazareth District Court,
pertaining to Roman Zadorov has been discovered to this date: a)
The signature box of the
purported “Verdict” record, which was filed by Attorney Galil
Spiegel with the “Notice of Appeal” in the Supreme Court in 2010
(discovered during inspection of the original records – paper court
file in the Supreme Court), instead of a lawfully signed and
certified, “True Copy of the Original”, record. b) The
signature box in the purported “Verdict” record, which was
discovered in the Office of the Clerk of the Nazareth District Court
in 2016, but which fails to appear in the “Decisions Docket”, or
the “Judgment Docket” in the electronic court file. The Chief
Clerk of the Nazareth District Court refuses to certify such record,
“True Copy of the Original”.

______

The fraud by the Nazareth
District Court judges and the Supreme Court justices in the case of
Roman Zadorov is uniquely despicable.

The
Ukrainian Roman Zadorov case in Israel is the mirror image of the
Jewish Mendel Beilis case in the Ukraine a century ago.

Israeli
judges in general are routinely engaged in fraud by fabricating court
process and court records a la Varda Alshech… they imagined up for
themselves immunity for criminality on the bench...

Over
the past 20 years, integrity of the Israeli courts has dramatically
deteriorated. In a free discussion by “Senior Legal Scholars”,
which was recently published, one of them describes the situation as
“a total jungle in the court. Do anything you can not to get
there”. Others described the judges as such that disregard the
facts and the law on a routine basis. [5]

The
Senior Legal Scholars discussed the “total jungle” as originating
from “a decline in formalism and increase in values”. In fact,
the circumstances originate in routine fraud by the judges –
conduct of simulated process and publication of simulated court
records. This type of fraud was documented in details in the Judge
Varda Alshech “Fabricated Protocols” scandal. Net-HaMishpat
system and IT systems of the Supreme Court are the fraud tools.

The Zadorov affair
demonstrates this condition in a particularly serious fashion.

The Israeli judges made up
for themselves immunity for criminality on the bench…

The
Israeli court today are patently incompetent courts!

LINKS:

[1]
2016-11-01
Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10)
and Zernik v Zadorov and State of
Israel (4650/16) in
the Supreme Court – repeat request for
duly signed and certified copies of decision records, filed with
Supreme Court “Chief Clerk” Idid Melul

https://www.scribd.com/document/326544397/[3]
2016-08-16 RE: Zadorov
v State of Israel
(7939/10) and Zernik
v Zadorov and State of Israel
(4650/16) – request for duly signed and certified copies of
decision records, filed with “Chief Clerk” of the Supreme Court
//

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/