A few months ago I found a website that was nearly the opposite of white-history.com. The primary focus of the website was to prove that most early cultures (from Europe to Mesoamerica) were started by Black African (people like the Khoi-San) Hunter-Gatherers that emigrated out of Africa with the receding Ice Age. A secondary focus was to prove that White (I suppose this includes Hindus and Semites) and Oriental people derived from an Asiatic population of Cro-Magnons interbred with Neanderthals. The third focus was that these non-Blacks migrated out of Asia and usurped control of the agricultural societies.

The articles are abundant with pictures and the website makes great use of ancient figurines, statues, and painted ceramics for its proofs.

I forgot the web address and am unable to find it again. If anyone is familiar with this website, please post the web address.

I think I've seen it, more moronic Afrocentric bullshit. They take anything and extrapolate it into something entirely different than from what the evidence supported consensus is. It's just simple psuedo-history.

I think I've seen it, more moronic Afrocentric bullshit. They take anything and extrapolate it into something entirely different than from what the evidence supported consensus is. It's just simple psuedo-history.

Click to expand...

I like to know what people think on matters, it gives me a bigger knowledge base so that I can make reasonable arguments against or for topics. Psuedo-History (simple and complex) is a major part of our world, remember it's the victor who writes the history of war -- and this tiny Earth has a lot of war.

I think I've seen it, more moronic Afrocentric bullshit. They take anything and extrapolate it into something entirely different than from what the evidence supported consensus is. It's just simple psuedo-history.

Click to expand...

It is not "Afrocentric Bullshit", but historical fact. There was a recent global genetic study,
that indicated that all humans alive on the Earth today, could trace their genetics back to
a East African Kenyan couple that lived in Kenya over 100,000 years ago. I was shocked
my self to view the genetic data.!. But this show proved that eveyone alive on the Earth
today decended from this Kenyan couple!!. The host of the show was white, they had done
extensive scientific genetic research before the show was broadcast. And the sicentific evidence was presented on the show for all to view.Many scientist checked the genetic data, and they found the same link to the Kenyan couple from 100,000 years ago!!.
This is not a lie , this is factual. Please google "kenya couple with genetic link for us all!".

Here's the paper the website most likely used as its source: Possible Ancestral Structure in Human Populations The paper claims that "Using sequence data from the Environmental Genome Project, they find strong evidence for ancient admixture in both a European and a West African population, with contributions to the modern gene pool of at least 5%. "

Note that it is Europeans and West Africans, NOT all non-Blacks.

At the same time, other researchers claim that there is no evidence of intermingling (News article

Regardless of which is true, who cares? It has nothing to do with "superiority" or "more evolved," (as if "more evolved" means "better," which it doesn't). Populations adapt to their environment, and are therefore "better" for that environment not in any intrinsic or absolute sense. Dark skin is clearly better suited for warmer environments, blue eyes are better for lower light conditions etc.

Here's the paper the website most likely used as its source: Possible Ancestral Structure in Human Populations The paper claims that "Using sequence data from the Environmental Genome Project, they find strong evidence for ancient admixture in both a European and a West African population, with contributions to the modern gene pool of at least 5%. "

Note that it is Europeans and West Africans, NOT all non-Blacks.

At the same time, other researchers claim that there is no evidence of intermingling (News article

Regardless of which is true, who cares? It has nothing to do with "superiority" or "more evolved," (as if "more evolved" means "better," which it doesn't). Populations adapt to their environment, and are therefore "better" for that environment not in any intrinsic or absolute sense. Dark skin is clearly better suited for warmer environments, blue eyes are better for lower light conditions etc.

Populations adapt to their environment, and are therefore "better" for that environment not in any intrinsic or absolute sense. Dark skin is clearly better suited for warmer environments, blue eyes are better for lower light conditions etc.

Click to expand...

Yes, absolutely... but intelligence is very much one of these traits, because you need a lot more of it to plan for a foodless, cold winter in Europe than in the always-abundant African areas.

Hence a white average IQ of 15 points higher than the black average IQ, as well as a white ability to control impulses far better.

Not that I want to upset the sacred notion of human equality or anything. That would be rude.

Useful Searches

About USMessageBoard.com

USMessageBoard.com was founded in 2003 with the intent of allowing all voices to be heard. With a wildly diverse community from all sides of the political spectrum, USMessageBoard.com continues to build on that tradition. We welcome everyone despite political and/or religious beliefs, and we continue to encourage the right to free speech.

Come on in and join the discussion. Thank you for stopping by USMessageBoard.com!