Trestle: 3 courses for only $35-!!! Get on it!

When it costs only $35 per person-!!! (That’s almost UNHEARD of in San Francisco. It’s practically the closest thing to free.)

Especially when the food & service is OUTSTANDING.

Seriously, I wouldn’t write about it if I wasn’t fanatical about the place. Trestle offers well-executed food at a reasonable price. Diners get to choose between two choices for each course.

Tip: Go with someone who’s willing to share. That way, you can order the whole menu between the both of you #winning.

The have a rotating menu that changes daily (2-3 new dishes every week/ rotating between 25-30 dishes a month), so don’t get your heart set out on anything you see in this post (don’t worry… I’ll be short with it!). Just know that everything we had was fantastic, and there wasn’t anything I didn’t enjoy.

Here’s what we had:

Appetizers:

Sweet corn soup: corn fritters, arugula puree, roasted corn

or

Falafel salad: crispy lavash, tzatziki sauce, mint leaves

Both of these options were a clean and fresh way to start the meal. Great job Trestle, the soup was especially awesome!

Dessert

The financier is broken up into crumbles on the plate with a dollop of ice cream and other fruity toppings sprinkled around.

or

Chocolate bananas foster: banana ice cream, caramel, candied walnuts

You get a brownie on the bottom, topped with ice cream and caramalized bananas (OMFG. This was soooooo yum!)

So to sum it all up:

Real talk. If any of you guys are ballin’ on a budget (and you want to impress a boy/lady), Trestle is YOUR NEW PLACE. You get an awesome three-course meal for only $35 dollars!!! Like, that’s seriously RARE in San Francisco.

Also, the service is amazing. The atmosphere is trendy. And best of all… the food is fantastic.

My wife and I came here for dinner a couple weeks ago and spent about $100 including the extra pasta dish and some wine, a great deal for what we got. Entree’s these days cost at least $20-$30 dollars alone.

I don’t think that this is a good idea that paypal holds the funds until the uomtcser receives the item, for the simple fact the uomtcser could say that they have not gotten the item and in fact they received the item. I think that they should just leave things the way that they are.