Greatings folks. I have a question regarding OAuth2. I have a couple api's built with mojolicious that I would like to add an OAuth2 provider on. Yesterday, when I starting looking to see what is available, mst recommended CatalystX::OAuth2, which appears to be a good implementation that I am planning on using with my catalyst sites. However, this won't work with my mojolicious sites, so I...

They take pull requests to add new frameworks. I've been wanting to add mojolicious since part 1 last week, but haven't had any time, so I figured I'd mention it here in case someone can get to it before me

Specifically, from their "expected questions" section of the first round: ' "Why doesn't your test include more substantial algorithmic work, or building an HTML response with a server-side template?"Â Great suggestion. We hope to in the future! '

It would be interesting later if it evolved to show how to do a few higher level things (implement a few simple sample apps), and compared across them. Kinda like the language shootout (which is probably a bad comparison, as that's flawed as well. Or maybe that makes it a good comparison...)

I've had an idea for a site that might prove more useful for stuff like this (and language comparisons in general) by not focusing on performance alone (or much at all), but idioms, and how to accomplish a concept in a language, to give really easy comparisons for simple things.

which is why I wasn't really asking to see Mojolicious on that list so I could point at performance, but just so *hopefully* if some better (i.e. I care about them more) metrics came out it would be represented in some small amount