David Adler on the sad state of a once-thriving format

In straight-ahead jazz and more experimental realms, it’s a given that times are tough: Album sales are negligible, musicians are underpaid and underexposed, and careers are increasingly punishing, do-it-yourself affairs. It’s sometimes assumed that “smooth jazz,” the lighter and glossier pop-jazz that came into heavy rotation in the ’80s and ’90s, must be where the money is. Surely this palatable groove-based music, often scorned by the jazz community as not jazz at all, is an easier route to commercial success, with broader support from the music industry and the masses.

Or is it? Reports indicate that smooth jazz, or “contemporary jazz” as it’s known on the Billboard charts, is in fact seeing a dramatic downturn. And the genre’s crisis points to larger historical questions about jazz, nomenclature and mass appeal. “Every month I hear we lost a radio station somewhere,” says veteran keyboardist and producer Philippe Saisse. New York’s CD101.9 switched to classic rock in early 2008 and then to all-news. KIFM 98.1 in San Diego—arguably smooth jazz’s world headquarters—went adult contemporary in early 2011. Stations in Chicago, Sacramento, Philadelphia and many other markets have dropped smooth jazz and switched formats as well. “It’s a lot smaller than it used to be,” says Allen Kepler, president of Broadcast Architecture, the consulting firm that launched the Smooth Jazz Network in 2007. “The big change for us is that it’s no longer such a popular format among the big broadcasters like Clear Channel and CBS and those large PPM markets.” (More about the ratings measuring device PPM, or Portable People Meter, to follow.)

The ripple effect is profound, given that entire careers in smooth jazz were built and maintained via terrestrial radio. “It’s becoming harder and harder to put together tours and concerts in cities that don’t have radio stations,” Saisse adds. “The problem for a lot of us,” says famed saxophonist Dave Koz, “is that we know the way it was. We have one foot on one piece of land that was in the past … and we’re using our other foot to find some semblance of solid ground. For people just coming up, new artists, it’s a different story.”

Former Yellowjackets bassist Jimmy Haslip, an in-demand sideman and producer, also speaks of declining album sales. “Now I see appalling figures,” he says. “I see a No. 3 record on the [Contemporary Jazz] chart and I find out that they have only 3,000 sales.” Even top-name artists? “Yeah, it could easily be,” Haslip adds, recalling a time when Yellowjackets “would easily sell 100,000.” (The band’s 1987 top seller, Four Corners, moved 350,000 units.) “Those numbers just don’t exist anymore.”

Keyboardist Jeff Lorber, who co-produced his latest release with Haslip, has some fun with the suggestion that people involved in smooth jazz might be heading for the exits: “No, they’ve already gone through the exits, they’ve taken the freeway home and they’ve gone to bed.”

Few would argue that smooth jazz is uniquely bad off. Record label dominance is over, digital music and media are ascendant, the business is being entirely remade, and opinion on the brave new online world is sharply divided. “On my desk right here I’ve got a check for zero dollars and 78 cents from YouTube licensing offers,” Saisse deadpans. “I’ve got some Spotify checks here for zero dollars nine cents. So it’s not quite making up for the royalties that we used to get from radio [laughs]. But I’m working on it. I’m collecting my zero-point-78-cent checks and we’ll see what happens.”

When people think of smooth jazz they often think of Kenny G. But G, who got his start in Lorber’s band, is an anomaly. His total album sales, reportedly topping 75 million, give an illusory picture of the kind of money that was ever available in the genre. According to John Ernesto, manager of the Berks Jazz Fest in Reading, Penn., “The way things are today, there could never be another Kenny G, because he relied on radio and record sales.”

The more typical smooth-jazz artist was far from a household name, and probably facing some familiar uphill battles. Guitarist Gil Parris, who debuted on RCA as a smooth jazzer in 1998 (sales: 23,000), reflects on the genre’s troubles: “It’s not only the demise of smooth jazz, I think it’s the demise of the middle class, the middle ground of music, period.

Either you’re in that top five with John Mayer and Rihanna and Taylor Swift, or you’re an icon in your 60s or older like George Benson or Herbie Hancock—they’re kind of unaffected. But the middle-ground people … now you start to see artists package themselves together, so instead of Kim Waters being able to sell out a venue, he’ll go as the Sax Pack, or Boney James will go with Richard Elliot and Norman Brown and Jeff Golub and they’ll use one rhythm section, because the whole middle ground is sort of disappearing. Smooth jazz is definitely the first to go because it’s part of that middle ground.”

Even if smooth jazz as a radio format is in decline, it doesn’t mean that pleasant, poppy quasi-jazz will cease being made. And yet artists are beginning to reinvent themselves and weigh other options. Trumpeter Rick Braun is crooning standards (on 2011’s Sings With Strings, co-produced by Saisse). Parris is wearing many hats and gravitating toward rock and blues (he recently backed Joe Cocker). Others like Boney James and Brian Culbertson are “reaching out to the R&B audience,” according to Ernesto, and guest vocals are becoming more and more common. Lorber has revived his original band name, the Jeff Lorber Fusion, and is making music with a bit of a rougher edge. Whether all this music continues to be called smooth jazz—a name embraced by virtually no one in smooth-jazz circles—is anyone’s guess.

It’s often said that jazz lost its commercial viability after bebop, but that isn’t quite true. Hard bop’s turn toward blues and gospel had a clearly populist intent. Pianist Horace Silver created a funky strain of jazz that deeply influenced Lorber, as the song “Horace” on his latest effort, Galaxy, makes clear. Jimmy Smith’s organ jazz, Stanley Turrentine’s husky soul-jazz tenor, Lee Morgan’s “The Sidewinder”: These were jukebox-ready sounds with an authentic connection to soul and R&B, and they kept jazz strong in black communities at the very time the avant-garde was rising up. “You don’t have to be a jazz snob at all to enjoy what Horace is doing, or the early Ramsey Lewis stuff, or Eddie Harris,” Lorber says. “You see plenty of examples of jazz that crossed over back in the day, great instrumental tunes. It was a pretty regular feature of the Top 10.”

“The first artist I embraced who represented that intersection between heady jazz and head-bobbing music was Cannonball Adderley,” says Philadelphia bassist Gerald Veasley, whose work as a leader since 1992 is often associated with smooth jazz. Haslip mentions Adderley as well, in reference to Lorber’s Galaxy sessions: “Groups like the Bar-Kays, Junior Walker, even early Cannonball records like ‘Mercy Mercy Mercy,’ ‘Jive Samba,’ ‘Country Preacher’—that’s what I had in my head when I walked in the studio with Jeff.”

It can be argued that Adderley, with Joe Zawinul on Fender Rhodes, was playing fusion before Miles Davis. But Davis is rightly considered the main instigator of electric jazz, the musical father of heavily amplified fusion bands such as the Mahavishnu Orchestra, Weather Report and Return to Forever. By the mid to late ’70s came what Lorber calls fusion’s second wave, typified by acts like the Crusaders and, well, the Jeff Lorber Fusion. “It was a little bit closer to instrumental R&B,” Lorber notes, “with more melody and forms closer to pop songs.”

A key figure in this second wave was the late Grover Washington Jr., who could play funk-jazz with strings on the classic Mister Magic but also hold his own next to Kenny Burrell, Ron Carter and Jack DeJohnette on Togethering. In a 2011 Before & After discussion with Larry Appelbaum, tenor legend Jimmy Heath knocked players with flashy technique and instead hailed Washington, who “had a singing saxophone sound that people could understand.”

Gerald Veasley understood, and eventually he’d go on to join Washington’s group: “Working with him was the fulfillment of a dream, because I heard his Live at the Bijou and used to just stare at the album cover. What a cool band, what a cool concept. It wasn’t music that you had to analyze, per se. But from my point of view, you did not hear any compromise. You heard something that was fully fresh and felt like it was nimble, that it could go in different directions, yet was rooted in groove. That’s what also drew me to folks like Roy Ayers, George Benson, people like that who predated the whole smooth-jazz idea.”

Arriving in Boston from France in 1975, Philippe Saisse was blown away by what he heard from Pat Metheny, the Brecker Brothers and others, and he’d soon cut his teeth in bands led by Narada Michael Walden and Al Di Meola. “At the same time,” Saisse remembers, “Hubert Laws and others were making records on the CTI label, really commercial records. … They were doing ‘contemporary’ jazz but it had substance; it was just dialed down. And it worked. Bob James, Joe Sample, Don Sebesky as an arranger—it was intriguing because I knew they were really deep musicians but they were able to cross over. George Duke had some massive hits. They had the support of radio, so you could have those hits if you were smart and if you knew how to dial down the genius level.”

Creed Taylor, founding visionary of CTI, had already experimented with “dialing it down” during his tenure at Verve and A&M in the ’60s, when he created what could plausibly be called the first smooth-jazz star: Wes Montgomery. A hard-bop guitarist of breathtaking originality, Montgomery took a dramatic late-career commercial turn and began recording pop hits like “Windy” and “California Dreaming.” His slickly produced, frequently lamented large-ensemble records contained some real pearls, however. And they set the stage for the transformation of another guitar monster and Wes disciple, George Benson, into a proto-smooth jazzer (and R&B singer) as well. The title track from Benson’s 1976 Atlantic release, Breezin’, is a definitive example of an early “contemporary” radio smash.

The genre began to take off. As guitarist Larry Carlton and other supremely gifted session players embarked on solo careers, they established a level of musicianship and individuality that’s proven hard to match. Part of it, in Saisse’s view, had to do with the new pop-savvy jazz growing steadily more commercial. “Everybody was learning the basics and then dialing it down,” he says. “But a lot of the new generation, they only learned the dialed-down basics. That was their basics. And then it was dialed down from there.”

“Supply and demand has gotten out of control,” Gil Parris adds. “Now everybody thinks they’re a recording artist. There’s an overabundance and a lot of it is really subpar. You can tell: How many people are playing as well as George Benson or David Sanborn? It has a very canned, personality-less sound. How many times can we take a hip-hop groove and put a few flat-five blues licks over it? It’s pretty lame when you hear it next to ‘Mountain Dance’ by Dave Grusin, that beautiful writing, or the Taxi theme by Bob James, or anything on Breezin’. Or when Eric Gale takes the [guitar] solo on ‘Mister Magic.’ It’s so personal. Nothing is coming out of that quality. But in defense of the new artists—I sound like an old curmudgeon—there’s just no budget for that.”

Corporate radio, smooth jazz’s lifeline, also did the music no favors by imposing narrow playlists and less-than-inspired programming. According to Veasley, who hosted a show on Philadelphia’s WJJZ for three years, “The radio format became more and more restrictive. I don’t know that it ever necessarily represented people’s tastes. … It was more like a funnel that was hard for artists to get through without altering their music, or without a real heavy push from major labels. … It was also complicated by radio consultants who drove a lot of the decision making: questions about how long the solo should be, what instrument it should be, what ratio of saxophonists to guitarists—all this crazy over-analysis of the music before the audience got a chance to hear it.”

Veasley continues, “I think some smooth jazz was made for the moment and sort of through painting by numbers. That’s not to denigrate my peers who have made it. Part of it has to do with the recording process that came along right at the same time. You had producers who could basically sit in a room with some loops and create performances. Unless you’re very creative, the music you make is going to sound more inside the box. Couple that with the constraints of radio and it was kind of a recipe for disaster. Now, contrast all of that with going to see smooth-jazz artists live: There you hear musicians who are really expressive and dynamic and trying things, not confined to the eight-bar solo. Certainly they’re not stretching like Ornette Coleman or Joe Lovano, but they’re still going beyond what was represented on radio.”

“Smooth jazz” took hold in the mid to late ’80s as a format name for WNUA 95.5 in Chicago, KTWV 94.7 (“The Wave”) in Los Angeles and CD101.9 in New York. Even Michael Lazaroff, director of the Smooth Jazz Cruise, professes to hate the term, because, as he says, “It conjures up an image and a sound that is not exciting, and nothing could be further from the truth.” Lorber points out that “‘smooth jazz’ was code—‘Hey, it’s jazz but it’s not Cecil Taylor!’ That’s basically what it was saying. As a radio format it was sort of a godsend, because it caught on around the country and gave instrumental musicians a platform to be exposed, which was amazing.” But Saisse provides a caveat: “The biggest stars in smooth jazz are only stars in the U.S. Even Kenny G doesn’t really have a career in Europe.”

So who are the core American fans? In radio parlance they’re “P1” listeners, the ones who truly care about what they hear. Lorber describes them as “orphans from R&B radio that used to play stuff like L.T.D., Kool & the Gang and Earth, Wind & Fire. Now the stations are playing more hardcore rap stuff, so those adult listeners looked for a place to go and they found it at smooth-jazz radio. Especially because the smooth-jazz formats included Sade, Anita Baker, Luther Vandross, so-called urban adult contemporary stars in a big way.” As recently as March 2012, Earth, Wind & Fire was No. 36 on the smooth-jazz chart at JazzWeek.

“As a musician,” Veasley confides, “I couldn’t always quite get it—the enthusiasm people had for this music that’s sort of in between. It doesn’t have the spontaneity of straight-ahead jazz, and it doesn’t have the sure-headed, shake-ya-thang groove of R&B and pop. It’s somewhere in between. But you had that baby-boomer audience that was more than passionate about it.” When WJJZ pulled the plug on smooth jazz in September 2008, Veasley was amazed by the listener e-mails. “It was almost like someone died,” he remembers. “You know the stages of grief? People were incredulous. You had folks who were angry, folks who were hurt, folks with an overwhelming sadness. The takeaway is that the powers-that-be underestimated the passion that people had for radio and the connection they had to the on-air announcers and the stations themselves.”

Lorber offers a dry-eyed counterpoint. “From what I’ve heard,” he says, “the new stations haven’t done as well as the smooth-jazz stations, but they don’t care. Because they’re looking for something else that has to do with the way these big corporations bundle their advertising. For whatever reason the smooth-jazz demographic didn’t work into that plan.”

One factor might have been that the smooth-jazz crowd is heavily mixed. “That was a revelation to me,” Veasley says, “when I started playing concerts and seeing how racially diverse the audience was. I thought, ‘Wow, this is exactly what it should be. It can’t be anything but good.’ When I got involved on the other side of the glass I started to understand that it was exactly the wrong recipe for radio sales. In other words, to go in and say, ‘Wow, we have this audience that is 50-50 white and black, male and female, with a wide age demographic’—that doesn’t appeal to people who pay for radio.”

Another factor was PPM, the ratings system introduced in 2007 by Arbitron, in which participants wear a small high-tech device known as a Portable People Meter to measure audience response over time. “As PPM came in, it’s pretty well documented, the [smooth-jazz] format rolled out,” says Allen Kepler of Broadcast Architecture. “Some of that was based on corporate agendas … [but] even the Arbitron people were saying it wasn’t as user-friendly to the type of people who were carrying the meters. It didn’t just hurt us, it hurt other niche formats like triple-A and urban radio.”

Indeed, the Spanish Radio Association raised public complaints about PPM in 2008, and several state attorneys general, including Bill McCollum of Florida and Andrew Cuomo (now governor) of New York, filed lawsuits against Arbitron. The Florida suit alleged that PPM undercounts minority listeners and thus “threaten[s] the viability of radio stations [which] air programming targeted at those minorities,” according to Friday Morning Quarterback, the music industry trade publication.

Denis Poole, one of Europe’s rare devout smooth-jazz fans, maintains the informative site Smooth Jazz Therapy from his home in the countryside near York, England. He visits the States regularly and knows the genre better than most American jazz critics, and what he says of smooth jazz—in his thick regional accent—is true of a lot of other music today: “It’s got a following out there more as a live genre than a recorded one. People come out in number to support concerts and festivals and the various things that the hotels put on. The Newport Beach Hyatt always gets well supported, and the Thornton Winery is legendary for putting on shows right through the summer. So that’s bucking the trend; it’s almost guaranteeing the survival of it.” The cruise business has also proven one of the last solid economic pillars of the scene.

Satellite and Internet radio are still in their relative youth and filling the gap to a degree, though they can’t play the seamless promotional role for local events that the terrestrial stations did. Conventional radio is still in the picture: The Smooth Jazz Network maintains a number of broadcasts, including a Top 20 countdown and a newly syndicated show hosted by Kenny G, which goes out to a dozen affiliates. G is spinning the likes of Wes and Cannonball and more current artists.

It’s not clear whether this and other SJN ventures can check the downward momentum. “We’re getting the product out there in the best way we can, but certainly not to the same number of people we were five or six years ago,” Kepler says. “But if you want to see the other side of the coin, take a look at WLOQ in Orlando. We put the Smooth Jazz Network on there last August and we’re doing extremely well. I still hold out some hope—it just has to fit into the plan of the local broadcaster, and in many cases that’s going to be somebody that owns six or seven stations.”

For their part, the artists are determined to see things in a positive light. “It’s an opportune moment,” Veasley offers, “because now there’s really nobody telling you what the formula should be. Artists are being forced out of their musical adolescence, where they have to grow up and make decisions about what they want to do.” Saxophonist Mindi Abair, whose recent American Idol appearances landed her a gig with Aerosmith, agrees. “This loss is actually starting a revolution,” she explains. “It’s making musicians say, ‘Well, what record do I really want to make?’ Are you going to make it for the smooth-jazz radio format? Probably not, because it’s not going to make or break you. I think this can be spun into something creative and good for all us, and it’s easy to lose sight of that. We’re artists—this is what we do. We’ll change it. The world will go on and people will still listen to music. Our music.”

Tomorrow: Kenny G on his audience, the demise of smooth, and his burgeoning comedy career.

8 Comments

Radio consultants like Allen Kepler warrant some praise for attempting to keep Smooth Jazz alive today. But Kepler and his associates also deserve the lion's share of blame for diluting the format itself. Kepler's firm (Broadcast Architecture) was all too willing to start adding Phil Collins records to the mix back in the late 80s in an attempt to "broaden" the demo who primarily listened at work. The logic was flawed and extremely short-sighted. Yes, Smooth Jazz itself was somewhat "lite" relative to Cecil Taylor but that's not to say compelling talent and performance weren't part of the lure for the audience. They LOVED this music and often dug deeper and discovered the true depth of jazz.

Broadcast Architecture also controlled most of the research covering the format and ruled the music selections for clients with an iron hand albeit hidden in a velvet glove. They willingly bent to the whims of their clients in an effort to maintain their domination of the format. Early smooth jazz stations captured the hungry ears of listeners who were attracted to the musicianship as well as the groove. Instead of growing the format as foreground entertainment, BA chose to turn it into a background music service you could relax to -- an updated version of Muzak. Blaming PPM ratings is also a cop out. Well programmed stations that promote their core music and actively interact with their audience succeed. Truth be told, Smooth Jazz could have been a big winner in PPM because so much of its listening occurs in secondary situations where someone has it on and the Arbitron meter catches the broadcast. But too many principals in the format (consultants, programmers and owners) were enjoying their white wine socials and counting the cash, sure the cruise would never end.

Excellent article David. I have been producing, airing and voicing this format on radio from 1986 to the present. Literally scanning the charts, listening, adding to my library, watching and studying the evolution and sometimes de-evolution of this form from that time.

Having been through several "Music Cycles" in the radio business and as a musician, I find
the correlation between the the fall of "Smooth Jazz" and the ongoing "Sub-Prime" economic disaster more than a coincidence.

Smooth Jazz, while putting across the appearance of being politically neutral, is in reality a strongly political music. It does not brook disagreement over the very idea that everything is somehow fine, or at worst semisweet. This is not a message that can be sustained in every political climate.

I wholeheartedly agree with Simon Jay Harper that "Jazz should not be seen as a statıc form of musıc." The jazz that began here in New Orleans in the late 1800s/early 1900s has undergone many different genres and incarnations since then, including ragtime, the big band era, the bebop (straight-ahead) era and all the way up to the present contemporary (smooth jazz) era. And, if it is to stay a vibrant, living organism, it will (and MUST!) continue to evolve; continue to reinvent itself and continue to be innovative. I've had this argument with fanatical devotees of "straight-ahead" jazz whose musical tastes are forever stuck in second gear and in an era that existed over half a century ago. They say Kenny G "ain't jazz." Well then, who is? Are the only jazz artists who ever lived people like Bird, Monk, Diz, Miles, Trane and a handful of others from that time? Ken Burns made that mistaken assumption when he did his five- or six-part documentary on Jazz, devoting 99% of his attention to the Louis Armstrongs and John Coltranes and Wynton Marsalises and giving everything from 1967 to the present short shrift. The truth is, jazz continued to evolve while stubborn fundamentalists refused to expand their own tastes and open their minds a few extra millimeters. Is Kenny G jazz? Yes he is. As much so as Satchmo, Trane, Marsalis or any of the others, just in a different way. A different style. Yes, smooth jazz IS dying as a sub-genre, but that is just a part of the natural progression. It has reigned for over two decades and that's plenty long enough. How long did the ragtime era last? The big band era? The bebop era? In some cases LESS than twenty years. It's time to move on to the next genre or sub-genre of jazz. Smooth jazz was starting to sound stale and unimaginative in recent years and that's always the sign of a demise. It's time for all jazz lovers to open up their minds to whatever it is that will come next. The excitement may be well worth the wait.

I should also add that smooth jazz never gained much of a foothold in the New Orleans area although efforts were made. For two years in the mid-90s there was a smooth jazz radio station here (KLJZ, 95.7 FM) and though it may have had a small following, that following was fanatical. The day the station changed formats -- to hard rock -- the response was blistering. The station was bombarded with phone calls, angry letters and probably emails from the few people who had access to that capability. KLJZ even sponsored concerts that attracted smooth jazz stars that normally didn't include New Orleans on their tours: groups like the Rippingtons and individual stars like Boney James. Several other stations followed shortly afterward with smooth jazz formats but they lasted even less than KLJZ in terms of longevity. Such a shame but thank God for YouTube where you can hear virtually every song ever made. I don't even listen to the radio anymore, either. YouTube and direct streaming rule!

Great, well-written article David. I agree much with Deke, and lay much of the blame for it's demise, on the iron-fisted, arbitrary limitations placed on what the programmers allowed on-air. This narrowing of musical, improvisational, & emotional elements, creating an unobtrusive flow of background music, stifled the eclecticism, adventurousness, and creativity of the burgeoning "Contemporary Jazz" scene of the early 80s.

Like killing the goose laying the golden eggs, they jumped on the bandwagon, only to cut & slice what they thought the "fillet", and proceeded to get out their cookie cutters, and gear for mass production. It worked for a while, as it was "fresh", and enjoyable, especially for a cool, sophisticated soundtrack for workspaces, cocktail parties, & chilling at home with a lover. However, the narrow musical confines, and playlists, eventually wore out that initial freshness & interest. I literally had a dentist office's staff beg me to tell those at the local "Smooth Jazz" station to please stop playing the same few Anita Baker/Kenny G/Sade tunes that had been played, over & over, & over, for years! Now, if the format became too boring for a dentist office, that's pretty bad....

I have to fault the musicians as well, for just as gangster rappers use the excuse that "it's what the record companies want", so too, Smooth Jazz artists felt they had no choice. However, we as artists always have the power to exercise at least some artistic integrity. I grew very tired of hearing tracks by some of the top artists, where a single drum loop was used for an entire song, a simple motif repeated endlessly over a mellow, funky groove, with little to no improvisation. Worse, even in live performance, I'd see the very same formula! No real melodies, a static, loop-like groove, and maybe only a few bars of any kind of solo or improvisation! Now really, how you can get in front of a crowd, call what you are doing "Jazz", and not improvise? Even today, while I used to be able to, I can no longer tell one sax player from another, with a few exceptions. I've seen clips of eight sax players at a festival, jamming on a tune (does it always have to be Mr. Magic, Chameleon, or Always There), and even watching them, I could not tell one's solo from another, as nothing they played expressed any originality, sound, or flavor, any different from the others.....
This is sad, and I'm afraid, just as with Rap, 20 years of Smooth Jazz has had a very real dulling effect on the creativity of younger musicians who grew up in this era. They have plenty of chops, just no personal identity, no stories coming through their horns, no soul, or as Ray Charles said he has to have, "a little dirt in the music".....

I agree that smooth jazz got way, way too watered down. I enjoyed smooth jazz when it first came out. The musicians hadn't started tailoring their music for the format yet and the DJs were playing hip musicians like Gato Barbieri, George Duke, Roy Ayers, and Herbie Hancock. When the artists started dialing down their music on purpose (best example is Lee Ritenour), everything started going downhill. When I deejay, I still play the musicians "I" like, which include "newer" artists like Kirk Whalum and Bob Baldwin—and my audiences love them. It's really hard to stay artful and relevant when you're dumbing down your own music! When I start my live-streaming interview/concert series in a few weeks, I'm going to feature the musicians who are true to their music, be it straight-ahead or smooth.

Just had this article forwarded to me. I must say, David hit a home run! I wrote an article that was nearly verbatim in 2008. The demise was already in full swing back then when I saw station after station folding across the U.S. In talking to people, who had first liked these stations, said exactly what I felt. The format was WAY TOO limited. Adding soul or R&B artists was an improvement, but it didn't make up for the lack of BITE. I jumped on the bandwagon in the 90's with the Rippingtons, Chris Botti, Rick Braun, Richard Elliot, Warren Hill, etc. But in the last decade everybody else sounds exactly the same. I couldn't pass a Downbeat blindfold test with new artists if my life depended on it.

I have talked to musicians during this time who all say their record labels tell them to "tone it down". So now we have elevator music, what an insult. Even the artists I like just get softer and softer. Smooth jazz seems to be reverting to New Age, and enough of the hip-hop hand clapping on every other beat, it's getting old. I guess I'm spoiled. I grew up playing traditional jazz in band, but was also heavily influenced by Motown and pop music. What I really wanted was a mix of both. I don't care about 20 minute long be-bop solos any more than I care about 20 minute screaming guitar solos in hard rock. I like my simple A-B-A melodies. Thank goodness BS&T, EWF, TOP, Chicago, Malo, Lighthouse, and all the other horn bands that came along. Still, I wanted something more jazzy. Then I was exposed to Bill Chase and Maynard Ferguson, and that changed EVERYTHING! High note fusion, but STILL no radio play. That changed with Benson, Jarreau, Mangione, Spyro Gyra, Sanborn, Quincy, Lorber, et al. That's where I'm still at today. Smooth simply lacks enough "ummphh".

It's funny Dave mentions my favorite station in the article. In the lat 80's I lived in Michigan where all I could get was the Windom Hill guys on late night radio. Driving back and forth to Ohio I found WJZZ out of Detroit. What an improvement. Last I heard though, they switched to smooth only, then went off the air. In the early 80's I lived in Florida and discovered WLOQ. Thought I died and went to heaven. I never heard a station before that would play Boz Scaggs, Paul McCartney, Elton John, Billy Joel, Stevie Wonder, mixed right in with Jeff Tyzik, Al Vizzutti, Buddy Rich, the Crusaders, Yellowjackets, Brecker Brothers, Pat Metheny, Weather Report, and lots of Maynard Ferguson. They would simulcast jazz and even pop concerts by the likes of Stephen Bishop. Because of their promotions, I was able to see people like Gato Barbieri, Doc Severinsen and his fusion group Xebron, plus countless others. They had all request nights at the station. Throughout the last decade, whenever I would visit the Orlando area, they played nothing but the same smooth schlock I can get anywhere. Rumor has it the station was sold. Whatever the reason, I guess the good old days are gone. Pardon me for preferring the past when jazz fusion had some personality.

Much of the article, and the comments I've read deal with the pigeon-holing or labeling of the genre. Nowadays if you say Smooth Jazz, you alienate an entirely different group of people that otherwise might have listened. This is what happens when corporate business people 'think' they know what we should be listening to. Oh wait a minute, the whole record business is like that now. And the critics have never been kind. Seems anyone who makes a buck is a sellout. Like jazz musicians have to starve for their art in smoky basement nightclubs to be pure. "Get 20 Italian mothers to cook spaghetti sauce, and each sauce is going to taste different. Jazz critics, to their own detriment, are blinded by preconceptions of musical categories". Chuck Mangione

If it wasn't for the internet I would never have heard all the fine contemporary jazz coming out of Japan. How to you categorize Jaz'presso, Indigo Jam Unit, Dimension, Jabberloop. Other groups like Incognito, Boston Horns, Santa Fe & the Fat City Horns, Nils Landgren, Dave Weckl, Heavyshift, Liquid Soul, Soil & Pimp, Matt Bianco, Mezzoforte, Sleepwalker. This isn't smooth jazz, and so they suffer from lack of radio airplay. I guess the only thing to do is start my own internet radio station to get this stuff out to an audience. So I did. I play a little of everything, to hell with labels.