I don't really care, but it's debatable. A study published in Science Magazine today presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a ďfossil fuelĒ derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.The lead scientist on the study ? Giora Proskurowski of the School of Oceanography at the University of Washington in Seattle ? says the hydrogen-rich fluids venting at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean in the Lost City Hydrothermal Field were produced by the abiotic synthesis of hydrocarbons in the mantle of the earth.

You need to think outside of the old box. Science is always changing, it's not absolute. The time we sit back and stop thinking like you is when we don't advance. We used to think eating soy was healthy just a few years ago. Keep up with the times....loser!

ThanksWe are done :DYou should look into scientology :)right up your tree

I was done long time ago with you, you are an idiot that thinks science never changes. You should look into scientific journals. Like I said, I don't really care, but am open to a scientist saying different. Russian and Ukrainian scientists have produced an elegant proof that abiotic oil production (from intense pressure and high temperatures at least 100 kilometers below the earth's surface) is entirely consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but that no such proof has ever been put forth for the fossil fuel theory. In fact, he states that there is no ďfossil fuel theory,Ē merely a hypothesis for which no proof has ever been set forth.

No seriously we are doneI am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionadoyou donít have enough information to talk on any science subject

No seriously we are doneI am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionadoyou donít have enough information to talk on any science subject...Science changes, you can try to insult me and talk big like you are the one and only expert, but by doing that you are calling people that are actual scientist that I posted from the same thing. People like Henrik Svensmark, and others. You even said all you do is take a telescope to schools and talk to little boys, you are the one that is an insult to science. Go eat some soy. Get some help!

The number of sciences you have to ignore to believe what you choose to believe means you know nothing, of any sciences at all.None of the wild beliefs you have, have passed the standards of peer reviewYou have no idea how rigorous that is.The reason they have not passed is because they have never been submitted, and for good reason. You are being suckered by people making money on conspiracy theory enthusiasts

Hey old man, this is 2013, not 1970. Stop living in the past, times have changed. You talk big old man, but modern day scientist don't agree with your old fashion. I posted the names of the scientist, why don't you tell them they are nuts...lol...I hope when I get old that I won't be as stubborn and backwards as you.

Seriously we are done, belief is not science, it takes actual evidence, things are put up for peer review so cross disciplinary sciences can weigh in on results. Nothing you are talking about has done that, it is shaman fooling the gullible, they are going after people that desperately want to believe something for religious or political reasons.

I am not discussing astronomy with an astrology nutSeriously we are done, belief is not science, it takes actual evidence, things are put up for peer review so cross disciplinary sciences can weigh in on results. Nothing you are talking about has done that, it is shaman fooling the gullible, they are going after people that desperately want to believe something for religious or political reasons.They have hit their mark, you are stupid enough to buy this crap

This is global warming, not astronomy which as I'm sure you might know is finding new discoveries all the time. Like I said, why don't you tell people like Henrik Svensmark, who is a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen, that he is an idiot??? He has no religious or political reasons, but you nailed it. The studies are coming from Government studies that are predetermined. I have never heard my Church say anything about it. But I know you had to add that with your Bigotry.

I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of scienceanything that has not done that, isnít science, but is propagandaYou are being played the fool

my gosh u are rude and full of itself, science is debatable, I had a teacher like that dumb as hell

I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of scienceanything that has not done that, isnít science, but is propagandaYou are being played the fool

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.