Re: Reply to header

From:

Jeremy Chadwick

Subject:

Re: Reply to header

Date:

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:38:37 -0800

User-agent:

Mutt/1.5.6i

If there's a moderator of this list, I'd like to request he/she chime
in about now. This has nothing to do with GNU screen.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:11:34PM -0500, Buddy Burden wrote:
> Shawn,
>
> >Sorry, but "change the list to work better with Outlook and Outlook
> >Express, and worse with everything else" is the elitist argument.
>
> Dude, are you seriously accusing me of using *Outlook*??? When I said
> we'd eventually get around to bashing each other, I had no idea it'd get
> _that_ vicious ...
>
> Thunderbird 0.8, Gentoo Linux 2.6.8.
>
> I have yet to see any evidence that adding the reply-to headers would
> cause behaviour that is worse with _anything_ else, much less
> _everything_ else. Please refer to Phil's quite excellent link provided
> earlier (where, I note, the term "elitist" is not really original to me
> (not that I imagined that it was)). (If you prefer a more technical
> term to describe your argument, we could use "relativist fallacy".)
>
> I really was planning not to respond further--I even let David's
> grumpy-ass reply slide completely(*)--but ... Outlook?? <shaking head>
>
>
> -- Buddy
>
>
> (*) If I _were_ going to reply to David, I probably would merely point
> that, by his own logic, his objection "I get enough spam already" is
> moot, since my MUA automatically removes spam quite nicely.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> screen-users mailing list
> address@hidden
>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users