Fresh proposals for an independent Scotland suggest another decade of public spending restraint, new analysis concludes.

An assessment of the SNP's Growth Commission report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that if current conditions could be considered austerity, then that would continue under the proposals.

Read More

The IFS commended the report for addressing head on the "challenging" public finance picture that would confront an independent Scotland.

The Growth Commission's recommendations include cutting the country's deficit from an "anticipated starting point" of 5.9% at the time of leaving the UK to less than 3%.

IFS said: "Their proposals imply another decade of the sort of restraint on public spending that Scotland is currently experiencing.

"If this is austerity, then austerity would be extended under the commission's proposals."

It continued: "The commission claims their proposals do not amount to austerity as public spending would be increasing in real terms.

"But their plans would mean spending on public services and benefits falling by 4% of GDP over the course of a decade.

"That's on top of the reductions delivered and planned by the UK government for the decade from 2010 to 2020, and the commission's proposals for immediate cuts to defence and other spending currently undertaken by the UK government.

"The ageing of the population - which adds to pressures on the health, social care and state pension budgets - means that keeping to an overall spending increase of just 0.5% a year would likely require cuts to many other public services."

IFS said it was "inconsistent" to claim that the plans do not amount to austerity while the UK government's current policy does.

The analysis points out that between 2016/17 and 2022/23, total public spending excluding debt interest payments is forecast to grow by an average of 0.7% a year in real terms.

"The commission's proposals for 0.5% increases per year therefore look remarkably like an extension of current policy in the UK: indeed they imply slightly slower real growth in spending than the UK Government is currently implementing," the IFS said.

The analysis said it was "difficult to see how a newly independent Scotland could avoid the sort of deficit reduction programme" set out by the commission.

Read More

It praised the report's emphasis on increasing productivity, labour force participation and the size of the working-age population, as well as "sensible suggestions" on immigration, and concluded it was "an important contribution to the debate" on Scottish independence.