On 4/26/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Seems like implemantation-specific tests for java.security package do not
> fit well into the proposed solution
>
> I think we do not have to stick to requirement about
> organization name in the tests: we already have tests in package java.*
> why don't have package tests.*?
+1. The smaller and obvious package names we have the easier to navigate.
"tests.*" looks very obvious and small.
Wishes,
--
Anton Avtamonov,
Intel Middleware Products Division
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org