I have a question regarding Assault Marines equiped with flamers. If an Assault Marine has a flamer and a CCW, can he still get his +1 Attack for having two weapons if there is a bolt pistol modeled on him? (I gave him a holstered pistol.) In the Codex, it says "Up to 2 Assault Marines can be armed with a weapon from the following list: flamer a +x points or plasma pistol at +y points."

Thing is, I know that Assault Marines with plasma pistols get the second attack. Since it never says that the flamer replaces the bolt pistol, I&#39;m assuming it&#39;s okay to have one modelled and claim the extra attack, but I wanted to run it by you guys and see what you thought.

Many people forget, or never know, that a trooper with a two-handed heavy weapon still has both the single-handed weapons he had in the past; largely the old character-armoury rules brainwashed them. Codecies Eldar and Dark Angels are fixing this, however.

...As is calling this website Tau Online: WEB SITES
Please don&#39;t use one of our trademarks to directly identify your web sit (e.g., "The Space Hulk Home Page"). This right is reserved for GW companies and formal licensees only.

This doesn&#39;t mean that you can&#39;t use our trademarks to talk about our stuff, it just means you need to make it clear that description is the reason why you are using them (e.g., "Cleanse and Burn - my web page dedicated to Games Workshop&#39;s Space Hulk game") is fine because you&#39;re using our trademarks to simply describe what your web page is about and because it identifies us as the publishers of the game.

Also, please do not use any material from the official Games Workshop websites. Instead, we suggest that you make your own.

WEB NAMES
Please don&#39;t use one of our registered trademarks as part of your web domain name. This right is reserved for GW companies and formal licensees only.

I really don&#39;t mean to be a pain, and I&#39;ll go and edit the original post to get rid of the point values (though I don&#39;t see how listing the individual option price is any different at all from listing the total point cost, but okay. I&#39;m the newb, you guys are the experts.)

And I&#39;d honestly appreciate it if you&#39;d refrain from calling me an incompetent moron with no common sense. Point values are point values, whether it&#39;s a total or not. Since there was no clear distinction described anywhere, I think it&#39;s a fair point to raise, and I&#39;d appreciate being treated with at least a modicum of respect.

You see its the matter of what GW will and will not be picky about. Or what will drop sales for them. If we allow the individual points cost of items to be submitted. Then one wouldn&#39;t really need the codex to write up army lists but can pull that data from online. Thus codex sales would go down and well GW starts sueing people. However just having the name Tau, in our website name does nothing but actually advertise for GW and doesn&#39;t drop their sales. See the difference?

Thus we must be carefull about posting "data" and word for word "rules" or GW could sue us and shut the site down. But names, dates, fluff in general is usually not really fussed about by GW.

However just having the name Tau, in our website name does nothing but actually advertise for GW and doesn&#39;t drop their sales. See the difference?

I do see the difference, however, I also see that using a GW trademark in the website&#39;s domain name is specifically mentioned in the official GW release as a no-no. I&#39;m not suggesting that we change the URL of our beloved forum; I&#39;m really just trying to justify posting a stinking number in the face of other things.

I do see the difference, however, I also see that using a GW trademark in the website&#39;s domain name is specifically mentioned in the official GW release as a no-no. I&#39;m not suggesting that we change the URL of our beloved forum; I&#39;m really just trying to justify posting a stinking number in the face of other things.

Please drop this. Posting a number is not going to bankrupt GW, but this is where we are required to draw the line.