poor Europe. it doesn't need loads of muslim immigrants imposing sharia law on their culture. whites can barely practice their culture and religion without being attacked by left wing atheists. but the same atheists proudly welcome in extremist muslims.

poor Europe. it doesn't need loads of muslim immigrants imposing sharia law on their culture. whites can barely practice their culture and religion without being attacked by left wing atheists. but the same atheists proudly welcome in extremist muslims.

who in turn will be killed by the Muslims themselves once they are a majority. Ironic isn't it.

who in turn will be killed by the Muslims themselves once they are a majority. Ironic isn't it.

Yet oddly satisfying!

In return for their service, we'll then give the muslims 30-days notice to vacate our nations.

DON'T miss the deadline.

__________________

"When asceticism is rational, it is a discipline of the mind and body to fit men for the service of an ideal. Its purpose is to harden and to purify, to suppress contrary passions, and thus to intensify the passion for the ideal."

The Mainstream media are saying the problem is with the unrepresentative Republican party. They should reach out to gays and women, Hispanics etc... If only the Republican party was more pro immigration etc...

Yet, I would say, this is completely wrong - the future and any solution lies with the Democrats, not in or with the Republican party.

There are 3 factors of production in an economy - Land, Labour and Capital.

All the problems we face originate in the current state of left wing politics and its sources of money - both in Europe and in the US.

This is the absolute ROOT CAUSE of what we are witnessing with the crazy mass immigration we face.

It is the left wing parties which are in the utterly perverse situation of using mass immigration against private sector Labour. Increasing the supply of labour, to prevent wages rising (supply/demand), and creating poverty conditions so that the normal opportunities and rising wages which lead to expansion for ordinary folk and their families are not there - despite massive technological and productivity gains which should cause wages to rise strongly and more opportunities to open up.

Why is it the left wing which aids immigration? Because it boosts profits and tax revenue at the expense of wages. The taxes can then be spent on the public sector (big unaccountable government). The bigger government can then provide the bigger welfare state, more services etc... for the average private sector low paid worker - despite the fact of wages are not rising and opportunities are thin on the ground! (That also makes people vote for the left!)

Mass immigration is thus the lifeblood of the Left's whole model of being in power.

It wasn't always like this - In the 1970s in Europe, the left wing - Labour parties (unions etc..) would not tolerate mass immigration for obvoius reasons.

The strongest policies to limit immigration were implemented by these left wing parties. NOT Right wing parties in the 1970s. After a period of inflation in the early 1970s and relaxed immigration, large numbers of private sector workers had joined unions to try to protect thei living standards.

These private sector unions, then funded the left wing parties and, because there was no way it was in the interests of your average private sector worker to have a massive new supply of workers to drive down wages, the left wing parties had harsh immigration laws - repeatedly and strongly implemented throughout the 1980s.

This all changed after 1990. In the 1980s - Inflation had died off. Private sector unions were looked on as a problem which caused economic decline. What was the point of them. Membership had declined to next to nothing. The left was funded, not by the private sector worker anymore - but by the big government loving public sector 100%.

The question now is - and its a crucial one in times of QE (money printing) and fake booms - is there a possibility of splitting the private sector democrat from the public sector and rich parts of the democratic party when confronted with rising immigration and inflation?

Is there room for a 3rd party - not of the Right - not a tea party movement - but of the left.

Can there be a split due of the party over the entire mass immigration model which favours the public sector, working against the private sector worker - towards a 3rd party?

Presently we have a situation where working people would feel they have to vote for Obama who says he represents the 99% rather than vote for Romney, the 1%.

The lack of a 3rd party simply means the above mass immigration political model - the source of all the ills, has no serious challenge and will continue on and on till its too late.