Taqiyya

Taqiyya

What is Taqiyya?

Taqiyya تقية (alternate spellings taqiyeh,taqiya, taqiyah, tuqyah) is a form of religious dissimulation,[1]
or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his
faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are at
risk of significant persecution.[2]

Taqiyya

All religions are not same. Telling all religions same is
Taqiyya. I do not say. Koran says, “...The only religion in the sight of
God is Islam...” (Koran 3:19). “If anyone desires a religion other than Islam,
never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter, he will be in the ranks
of those who have lost (their selves in the Hellfire).” (Koran 3:85)

Here are other evidences from Koran,

[Koran 3:28] The
believers should not take the unbelievers as guides in preference to the
believers he who does this does not belong to Allah in anything, unless you
have a fear of them (Kafirs). Allah warns you to be cautious of Him, the
arrival is to Allah.

[Koran 16:106]
Whosoever disbelieves in Allah after believing except he who is forced while
his heart remains in his belief but he who opens his chest for disbelief, shall
receive the Anger of Allah and for such awaits a mighty punishment.

The Qur'an:

Qur'an (16:106)
- Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a
lie.

Qur'an
(3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as
friends, unless it is to "guard themselves."

Qur'an (9:3)
- "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..."
The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its
capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

Qur'an (40:28)
- A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith"
among those who are not believers.

Qur'an (2:225)
- "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but
for the intention in your hearts" The context of this remark is
marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the
greater good.

Qur'an (3:54)
- "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and
Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme
(or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is
deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that
Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also
8:30 and
10:21)

Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there
are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a
greater purpose.

From the Hadith:

Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'"
The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his
thirty unarmed men by Muhammad's men after he "guaranteed" them safe passage
(see Additional Notes below).

Bukhari (49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by
inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.

Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali
confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."

Muslim (32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in
anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for
bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the
husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in
a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."

Bukhari (50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at
Muhammad's insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used
dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against
Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was
brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.

From Islamic Law:

Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 - 8.2) -
"Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable
through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through
lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such
an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if
attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to
circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and
obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously precautionary in all cases
to employ words that give a misleading impression...

"One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by
telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more
damaging, one is entitled to lie.

Additional Notes:

Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to
defeat them. The two forms are:

Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true.

Kitman - Lying by omission. An example
would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse
5:32
(that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind")
while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate
murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief."

Though not called Taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly
used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans that allowed him
access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover.
The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the
treaty two years later, and some of the people in the city who had trusted him
at his word were executed.

Another example of lying is when Muhammad used deception to trick
his personal enemies into letting down their guard and exposing themselves to
slaughter by pretending to seek peace. This happened in the case of Ka'b
bin al-Ashraf (as previously noted) and again later against Usayr ibn Zarim, a
surviving leader of the Banu Nadir tribe, which had been evicted from their home
in Medina by the Muslims.

At the time, Usayr ibn Zarim was attempting to gather an
armed force against the Muslims from among a tribe allied with the Quraish
(against which Muhammad had already declared war). Muhammad's "emissaries"
went to ibn Zarim and persuaded him to leave his safe haven on the
pretext of meeting with the prophet of Islam in Medina to discuss peace.
Once vulnerable, the leader and his thirty companions were massacred by the
Muslims with ease, belying the probability that they were mostly unarmed, having
been given a guarantee of safe passage (Ibn Ishaq 981).

Such was the reputation of Muslims for lying and then
killing that even those who "accepted Islam" did not feel entirely safe.
The fate of the Jadhima is tragic evidence for this. When Muslim
"missionaries" approached their tribe one of the members insisted that they
would be slaughtered even though they had already "converted" to Islam to avoid
just such a demise. However, the others were convinced that they could
trust the Muslim leader's promise that they would not be harmed if they simply
offered no resistance. (After convincing the skeptic to lay down his arms,
the unarmed men of the tribe were quickly tied up and beheaded - Ibn Ishaq 834 &
837).

Today's Muslims often try to justify Muhammad's murder of
poets and others who criticized him at Medina by saying that they broke a treaty
by their actions. Yet, these same apologists place little value on
treaties broken by Muslims. From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made
to non-Muslim are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.

Leaders in the Arab world routinely say one thing to
English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own
people in Arabic. Yassir Arafat was famous for telling Western newspapers
about his desire for peace with Israel, then turning right around and whipping
Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews.

The 9/11 hijackers practiced deception by going into bars
and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were
fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well, in fact, that
even weeks after 9/11, John Walsh, the host of a popular American television
show, said that their bar trips were evidence of 'hypocrisy.'

The transmission from Flight 93 records the hijackers
telling their doomed passengers that there is "a bomb on board" but that
everyone will "be safe" as long as "their demands are met." Obviously none
of these things were true, but these men, who were so intensely devoted to Islam
that they were willing to "slay and be slain for the cause of Allah" (as the
Qur'an puts it) saw nothing wrong with employing Taqiyya in order to
facilitate their mission of mass murder.

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it
"has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported
any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization." In fact,
it was created by the Muslim Brotherhood and has bankrolled Hamas. At
least nine founders or board members of ISNA have been accused by prosecutors of
supporting terrorism.

Non believer (Kafirs) need to know some simple facts about
Islam. People assume Islam is just another religion like their own and this is
fatal mistake. I take some simple facts, besides others, about Islam to show my
contention.

Three simple fact about Islam for non
believers (Kafirs)

All religions are not same.

1. Muslims apply Taqiyya (Koran 3:28 and 16:106) to make
non-Muslims believe that their religion is being hijacked by some misguided
Muslims. However, Islam is not being hijacked. ‘Islam has been hijacked’ is
what non-Muslims naturally assume because they assume all religions are the
same. So they further assume that some crazies must have hijacked the religion
because surely no religion would actually encourage the killing of innocents.
Once non-Muslim people realize that it is not true, non-Muslims would start seeking
real solutions.

2. Allah and his Islam allow Muslims to deceive non-Muslims,
if it helps Islam. The dogma of taqiyya is unknown to non-Muslims. Knowledge of
the principle would help immunize non-Muslims from the deception. They would at
least not take everything a Muslim leader says as true. You can see (and share)
some excellent examples of taqiyya in the movie, Obsession.

3. Through the principle of taqiyya (Koran 3:28 and 16:106)
or otherwise to keep striving to institute worldwide Shari'a law, until all
governments have been converted to Shari'a law, is a religious duty of a Muslim
and unfettered fundamental right provided by the Article 29(1) of the Indian
Constitution. Most people don't realize how politically-oriented Islam is at
its core. Shari'a is the law of Allah. Any other form of government is a sin.
Muslims have accepted servility of their rulers, which has been given to the
rulers by Muhammad as legacy. Allah is fabrication of Muhammad. I think when
kafirs understand the fact; they would immediately grasp the basic principle
that all governments must immediately stop propagation of Islam.

4. Since Christians and Muslims accept servility, like
bullock and sheep of peasant, which is the basic requirement of rulers, they
are getting full support and protection from the rulers.

Another Taqiyya

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful? Almost
every chapter of Koran, the scripture of Islam, starts with the very slogan.
This is most stunning example of taqiyya.

Yet another Taqiyya

AsSalaam O Alaikum (Peace be always with you. AMEEN.)

Peace Is taboo in Islam. Allah is war monger.

"Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto
you; but it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you and it may
happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, you knew
not." Al-Baqarah (Koran 2:216)

(Koran, al-Anfal 8:65]

"O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be
of you 20 steadfast, they will overcome 200 and if there be of you a 100, they
shall overcome a 1000, because the disbelievers are a folk without
intelligence"

"It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he
hath made slaughter in the land. You desire the lure of this world and Allah
desires for you the hereafter and Allah is Mighty, Wise. (Koran, al-Anfal 8:67)

Muslims' Allah and his Islam have divided humanity between
Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or
convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad.
(Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to either secure heavenly
brothel or honour of Ghazi with ownership of Kafirs' land, women and
properties.

Yet another Taqiyya

Islam is a religion of peace
and co-existence, wherein there is ample scope for freedom of expression. You
can express your views even if you differ. The decision is arrived at through
consensus in all important matters.

Religion of peace?

The Warfare/Qitaal is ordained upon Muslims in situations of
self-defense to guard oneself (Let humanity know as to who was killing Muhammad
in Badr?). It is not prescribed for conversion purposes. [What (Koran 33:61)
says?]

For opposing mosques and Azaan, our 9 officers are in jail.

Islam requires Muslims to feel enmity toward non-Muslims
(upheld by taqiyya, or deception) and exhibit loyalty to the umma, or the
Muslim community. It embodies the stealth principles of Sun Tzu's ancient
Chinese war doctrine: "[s]ubduing an enemy without force is
best" and "[a]ll warfare is based on deception."

Religion of co-existence?

Muslims' Allah and his Islam has divided humanity between
Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or
convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad.
(Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to either secure heavenly
brothel or honour of Ghazi with ownership of Kafirs' land, women and
properties. Where is co-existence in Islam?

You can express your views even if you differ?

I quote Lord Buddha.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it
or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
reason and your own common sense."

In contrast,

The radical weakness of Judaism, Christianity
& Islam as moral philosophies lie in their eradication of the individual
conscience of humanity in favor of unthinking submission to the mere letter of
revealed law. The long cherished moral, liberty of faith, right to property,
chastity and dignity of women are snatched in lieu of booty and sex. The Bible,
Koran and Sunnah (example of Mohammed) stand above reason, conscience, or
nature. A thing is right - including acts and laws abhorrent to
"superseded" or "irrelevant" natural morality - simply
because Jehovah, Jesus and Allah say so, or because the prophets have thus said
or done. The lack of any pretense to a moral basis for Bible or Sharia (Islamic
law) is open and explicit: there is no "spirit of the law" in
Christianity and Islam, no rationality behind it for human reason to discover
by exercising man's God- given intellect. There is no discernment of the
consequences of deeds, and revelation and traditions must not be questioned.
Nor may any other standard of good and evil - least of all any notion of
"natural" justice such as that assumed by the founding documents of
our Veds or Manusmriti - be invoked.

Torah, Bible and Sharia cannot be penetrated by
reason (its apparent inconsistencies notwithstanding) and the very attempt is
forbidden heresy. It's blasphemy and attracts death penalty in Islamic and
Christian countries and punishment u/s 153 and 295 of the Indian Penal Code.
Every Jew, Christian or Moslem, who is qualified to give a sound opinion on
matters of Torah, Bible or Sharia, is entitled to interpret the application of
Torah, Sharia or Bible when such interpretation becomes necessary, but where an
explicit command of Jehovah, Jesus and Allah or Prophets already exists, no
rabbi, Pope, Father, Gideon, Cleric or Mufti, Aalim, Moslem leader or
legislature can form an independent judgment. Since Muhammad is the final
prophet, there can be no further development in any judicial matters where the
Koran and Sunnah provide guidance. This deeply undermines the possibility of
rational civic debate in Moslem Christian nations and accounts for the
distinctly inhuman flavor of their legal systems.

The notorious frauds, named prophets, have fabricated a new way of making the whole humanity their
slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own
followers, into their slaves for they have made their fabricated gods
unapproachable. Those who accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of
prophets as the prophets have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets
alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of the prophets are slaves of
their prophets. In lieu of providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets
get killed those who do not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world comes
under the control of the prophets. However these monopolies of prophets have
put the human race at the brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.

Do Christians not feel ashamed that they worship
a criminal god, who has snatched their liberty, wisdom and manhood (Christians
believe that they are sheep)?

Our children will ask 'what did our forefathers
do', and their answer will be-they did nothing."

No sooner, one accepts Islam, Judaism, Christianity,
and Socialism, the criminal activities of murder, plunder, incest and rape of
women ceased to be considered crimes instead these crimes turn into the source
of sustenance and heaven after death for these criminal democrats, Communists,
Muslims, and Christians.

However, in contrast, there is Vedic Sanskriti. It
grants liberty of worship of god of one’s choice. (Gita 7:21). Supports one's
right to property. (Manusmriti 8:308).

Islam means submission, while humanity is fighting
for liberty, Muslims are becoming human bombs for servility of Allah.

The vast preponderance of ignorant Jews,
Christians and Muslims do not know their prophet or their religion. They lead a
life of ignorance, despair, tyranny, and mind-numbing rituals. They are kept in
the dark, purposely deceived, for the benefit of clerics and kings. There is no
incentive for Muslims and Christians to learn. Even if exposed to the truth,
they would not reject Islam (Koran 4:89) or Jesus (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11) for
fear of their lives. The Koran of Muslims and the Bible of Christians
themselves confirm these startling realities. Allah commanded Muslims “not to
question the Koran,” for those who did, he said, “discarded their religion.”
(Koran 5:101 and 102). They may test this fact by asking for their civil
rights. They would realize that doors of heaven have been closed for them.

Where is the liberty promised by the Indian and US
Constitution in their preambles? While humanity is fighting relentless war for
liberty, public servants, Jews, Christians, Muslims, and most human
races have no shame that they have voluntarily relinquished their liberty,
wisdom and manhood in lieu of booty and sex. (Koran, 8:1, 69 and 41), (Bible,
Isaiah 13:16) and (Bible, Genesis 2:17). They have no shame that they are
becoming human bombs and fighting to retain their servilities of Jehovah,
Jesus, Allah, rulers, clerics, dead Socialists, Communists and Democrats.
Jehovah, Jesus, Allah, rulers, clerics, dead Socialists, Communists and
Democrats have snatched the very instinct for liberty from their followers.
Look! Still Jews, Christians and Muslims do not feel sorry that they are
getting cheated, corrupted and humiliated by their so called merciful Allah,
Jesus, Jehovah, clerics and rulers. They are happily defending their
servilities in lieu of booty and sex.

The notorious frauds, named prophets, have
fabricated a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of
faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their
slaves for they have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those, who
accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets
have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods.
Thus the followers of the prophets become slaves of their prophets. By
providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets got killed those who did
not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world came under the control of the
prophets. The prophets died and left behind their legacies to clerics and rulers.
Why should one believe? Why not one search Ishwar either by Yog or Kundalini
Jagran? However, these monopolies of prophets have put the human race at the
brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.

This is because if raping women of alien faith is
free from blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute
Christians, who have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians
before the eyes of the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)?

If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed
is justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been
commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible,
Luke 19:27) If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the
democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens’ fundamental right to
property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits?
If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the
moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves?

Why should we tolerate that Indian Constitution
that grants unfettered fundamental right to minorities to slay and rob the
people of alien faiths and rape their women? [Article 29(1)]. Governments are
duty bound to protect the properties of their citizens. Where is the moral in
Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution that snatches properties of the
citizens?

Stopping the critiques through section 196 of the Criminal
Procedure Code.

Section 196 of the CrPC

This section was compiled by the Britishers in 1860 AD with
double purpose. While the section deprives public, police and judiciary from
filing any complaint or trying any accused, who commits offence u/s 108, 153,
295 or 505, it simultaneously provides authority to Government to punish and
harass those, who protest against abuse and insult of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram as
well as deprives one from exercising one’s right of private defense provided by
sections 102 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code.

Section 196 of the CrPC

Prosecution for
offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such offence.

(1) No court shall take cognizance of-

(a) Any offence punishable under Chapter VI or under section
153A, 1[section 295A or sub-section (1) of section 505] of the Indian Penal
Code (45 of 1860), or

punishable under sections 153/295 of the Indian Penal Code

(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence, or

(c) Any such abetment, as is described in section 108A of
the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), except with the previous sanction of the
central Government or of the State Government.

2[(1A) No court shall take cognizance of -

(a) Any offence punishable under section 153B or sub-section
(2) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) of section 505 of the Indian Panel
Code (45 of 1860), or

(b) A criminal conspiracy to commit such offence,

Except with the previous sanction of the Central Government
or of the State Government or of the District Magistrate.]

(2) No court shall take cognizance of the offence of any
criminal conspiracy punishable under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (45
of 1860), other than a criminal conspiracy to commit 3[an offence] punishable
with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two
years or upwards, unless the State Government or the District Magistrate has
consented in writing to the initiation of the proceeding:

Provided that where the criminal conspiracy is one to which
the provisions of section 195 apply, no such consent shall be necessary.

(3) The Central Government or the State Government may,
before according sanction 4[under sub-section (1) or sub-section (1A) and the
District Magistrate may, before according sanction under sub-section (1A)] and
the State Government or the District Magistrate may, before giving consent
under sub-section (2), order a preliminary investigation by a police officer
not being below the rank of Inspector, in which case such police officer shall
have the powers referred to in sub-section (3) of section 155.

Invoking "Islamophobia" and "Blasphemy" through
taqiyya.

Another key tactic cited in the Sonia’s strategic plan to
eradicate Vedic Sanaatan Dhram is to prevent infidels (Kafirs) from learning the truth
about Islam by controlling how Islamic doctrine is discussed and the language
used to describe Islam and Muslims. This method is effectively aided by
the India's culture of multiculturalism, in which charges of prejudice and
racism -- like "Islam phobia" -- trump all offenses.

The all too convenient charge of "Islam phobia"
has been proclaimed when non-Muslims have critically evaluated the tenets of
Islam, denounced terrorist activities, called attention to inappropriate or
threatening behavior, denied requests for accommodations beyond what is
customary and normal, depicted Mohammed in unflattering ways, or even quoted
directly from Islamic scriptures.

Example of religious hate crime is Azaan and preaching of
genocide of Kafirs from mosques. It lulls the general populace and renders it
helpless to defend itself against the real Islamic threat.

A parallel move, used when actual Islamic terrorist actions
have been taken, is to shift the blame for those actions onto
non-Muslims. Thus, those who have expressed negative views of Islam and
Muslims and who have cast suspicions about Muslims' activities are deemed culpable
for Islamic terrorism. Further, Sonia’s public servants issue veiled
threats that the targeting and misrepresentation of Muslims will lead to
distrust within Muslim communities and foster an unwillingness to cooperate with
authorities to strengthen homeland security.

A related diversionary tactic is to blame jihadist acts on
social or economic problems such as poverty, lack of opportunity, and bias
against Muslims. In effect, the argument goes, Islamic terrorism is being
manufactured by Islam phobia or poverty and has nothing to do with Islam.
The victims of Malegaon bomb blast is blamed for its insensitivity to Islam,
and the need for formalized measures or legislation is advanced to ensure that
infidels aren't harmed further by violent reactions when Muslims legitimately
feel disrespected. However, they would keep on disrespecting Kafirs and
their religion. Legislation such as the Istanbul Process, the collection of
anti-blasphemy laws passed by the U.N., is presented as a necessary option
under the guise of condemning insults to religion in general. Yet the real
intent is to eliminate any criticism of Islam, as is made obvious by the
regular and public condemnation of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram through Azaan and
preaching from mosques by Muslims, who populate the internet with videos
calling for jihad against infidels.

Advancing fatal dogmas

Another arrow in the quiver of Muslim tactics is to seize
control of the education of military and government employees about Islamic
doctrine. Sonia’s public servants do this by arguing that non-Muslims are
unequipped to teach Islam and that it must properly be taught by Muslims.
As a result, Sonia has provided Muslim sensitivity training for law enforcing
departments. Even Armed Forces, state and local law enforcement agencies, and
others, all of it are trained under the guise of fostering a "better
relationship between law enforcement and the Muslim community." Yet
at the same time, Jihadis distributed posters declaring, "Build a Wall of
Resistance, Don't Talk to the C.B.I." and advised Muslims that they are
the victims of anti-Muslim bias.

Monitoring news reports and media portrayals

Managing the image of Muslims portrayed in the media is
another aspect of the Islamic inside-influence operation to prevent accurate
knowledge of the enemy. Threats of violence and boycotts and the
brandishing of financial clout have been used against the media to alter the
message about Islam, mute any potential criticism or negative inference, and
blunt attempts to educate the public about a very real threat.

Media spin management is yet another aspect of the jihad
that keeps non-Muslims in the dark about Islamic terrorist activities.
The spin is managed by Sonia herself through Muslim front organizations.
For example, shortly after 26/11/2008 attack in Mumbai, Muslim leaders
aggressively importuned the producers of the TV show, which portrayed
terrorists as Muslims. Sonia pressured even Bollywood to change the
villains from Muslims to Hindu terrorists in films.

Ignorance and silence

The shutting down of military and government training, the
close monitoring of news reports and media portrayals, the advancing of false
theories, the use of free speech-curtailing anti-blasphemy legislation, and the
denial of jihadist terrorism as an integral part of Islam and portraying Islam
as “religion of peace" -- are all tactics used in the service of keeping
infidels totally in the dark about the true nature of the Jihad are well in
place to defeat them (Kafirs).

As apocryphal as crying wolf, false cries of blasphemy serve
a sinister purpose -- to shut down any and all productive dialogue on the true
nature of the threat faced by humanity. The goal is to ensure ignorance
and induce complacency so that the supremacist, misogynist, discriminatory, and
totalitarian nature of Islam is not known and Muslims can commit genocide of
Kafirs.

A fitting quote by an intelligence analyst best sums up the
situation:

“It is important to understand how effective this operation
has been. I know of no one in the U.S. government who can speak out
publicly or privately against Islamists, radical Islamists or militant
Islamists. The operations targeting the National Defense University, the
Joint Forces Staff College and the FBI has effectively censored everyone.
You will NOT find any documentation censoring anyone and all the academic
institutions will claim, and back up in writing, academic freedom, but,
unfortunately, the message has already been sent - do not say anything unless
it has been approved by CAIR, MPAC and the other Muslim Brotherhood
organizations.”

Rulers, Judges, Governors, Leaders, reformers, saints,
Media, Islamic and Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving
humanity. The truth is not hidden, nor is it hard to find. Media is scared,
clueless, and willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. The
perpetrators of Islamic terror and Christianity's Mission are inflamed with
violent and racist doctrines. The doctrines are, “Fight them (non-Muslims)
until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran
8:39) and “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them
bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse
27. Both have agenda, and Human races are ignorant of it.

Christians and Muslims would continue to wage Jihad and
Mission until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means is
petro dollars and Missionary funds and motivation is Koran and Bible. (Koran
8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). Non-violence is imposed upon Aryans only through
[Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] and Sections 196 and 197 of the
Criminal Procedure Code. If we don’t retaliate, they would keep on killing
Humanity.

Dear reader. You are on cross road and have no choice. You
are given an Indian Constitution to ensure your Genocide and eradication of
Vedic Sanaatan Dhram. ARYAVRT wishes to get you rid of it. Are you willing to
face challenge?

We, the followers of Vedic Sanaatan Dhram, warn the human
race for impending danger of extinction of human race; because we have threat
from the Indian Constitution itself, the Article 29(1) of the Indian
Constitution of which provides unfettered fundamental right to Christian and
Muslim to slay each other as well as those, who are neither Christian nor
Muslim.