tate thanx for the input! according to covers, if you played the cubs,bost,nym,nyy,laa,lad and tb you would be -521 {moneyline]and -1170 {run line]. these are probably the 7 most PUBLIC teams. it's always been a debate ml vs rl. right now ml is the way to go. as far as vig goes, it's the same whether it's one game or a 1000 games.

sambuca, Im curious, again with bases, (and hockey) Playing on the BEST team for every game that week,, geesh,, tough nut to crack,

I havetn backtested it but I wonder, if you bet the best team to win thier first game?!?!

or again, Possible, a PROGRESSIVE BET on a -1.5 runline?? that would put JUICE on your side, and allow you to reasonably progressively bet 2-3 games in search of 1 win? Please accept this as constructive criticism, I rreally dig the angle here, and want to just try and throw some ideas around.

tate,thanks again for your response. this system is in a experimental stage. in fact i'm tracking this for 2000 games.

i realize it takes a 3rd grade education to play this system!

i will then analyze the results and perhaps add filters where needed. i'm sure 95% of the people in this forum believe i will bottom out at 50% ats because i'm playing so many games.

they could be right!

i noticed that good teams cover more than bad teams through out the years. the problem with this system is i'm not always playing the best teams. after a season is over there are many teams i've played which were not the best. this brings down the winning pct.quite a bit.

who knows this could be a system to fade when it's all said and done.

unlike most people, i will continue to post whether it tanks or not!!!

For curiousity sake.. how long do u plan on testing this for? There must be a cut-off point after so many losing weeks?

Have u thought about adding filters, like only playing these teams at home? Or possibly running a Chase on the Top 3 starting each week. I bet if u back tested the Top 3 teams on Chasing each week to win 1 game the results would be damn near 100%, maybe even 100%??

I am currently running a System where I play only the top Home Teams. There are filters involved, and it produced huge results so far.

tate,thanks again for your response. this system is in a experimental stage. in fact i'm tracking this for 2000 games.

i realize it takes a 3rd grade education to play this system!

i will then analyze the results and perhaps add filters where needed. i'm sure 95% of the people in this forum believe i will bottom out at 50% ats because i'm playing so many games.

they could be right!

i noticed that good teams cover more than bad teams through out the years. the problem with this system is i'm not always playing the best teams. after a season is over there are many teams i've played which were not the best. this brings down the winning pct.quite a bit.

who knows this could be a system to fade when it's all said and done.

unlike most people, i will continue to post whether it tanks or not!!!

Just noticed I missed this post.. guess you're testing for 2000 games.

Activities offered by advertising links to other sites may be deemed an illegal activity in certain jurisdictions. Viewers are specifically warned that they should inquire into the legality of participating in any games and/or activities offered by such other sites. The owner of this website assumes no responsibility for the actions by and makes no representation or endorsement of any of these games and/or activities offered by the advertiser. As a condition of viewing this website viewers agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from the viewer’s participation in any of the games and/or activities offered by the advertiser.