On Jan 21, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Friedrich Vosberg wrote:
>> On 16.01.2009, at 1.41, Alex Hamann wrote:
>>> On 15.01.2009, at 23:57, Juergen Fenn wrote:
>>>>> Now, *has* somebody tested this?
>> Yes. I did. It's a mess compared with using BibDesk with LaTeX.
This is not useful or constructive feedback. A quick search with
Google shows that a fair number of people are happy with it.
>> I haven't tested it but CiteInPages has been around for some time
>> and James Harrison is maintaining and developing his script in
>> coordination with the BibDesk developers. He is also a regular on
>> the BibDesk mailing list and I can not remember having ever heard
>> about anybody complaining about CiteInPages not working on that list.
>> I've asked in the BibDesk users mailing list for using Pages '09 and
> BibDesk, particularly regarding citations in footnotes. And this is
> the James' answer:
>>http://tinyurl.com/9u7q2e
If your statement that "It's a mess" is based on this post, the
problem is a limitation of Pages' AppleScript support. Unfortunate,
but it doesn't really reflect on CiteInPages itself, and James
responded to your question less than an hour after you posted it.
--
Adam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2415 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://email.esm.psu.edu/pipermail/macosx-tex/attachments/20090121/76af0da2/attachment.p7s>