Scientists march to support global-warming censorship: the New Ridiculous

Scientists march to support global-warming censorship: the New Ridiculous

A primary principle of fake news: “scientists agree”

by Jon Rappoport

January 29, 2017

USA Today has the story (1/26): “American scientists worried about climate change and skeptical of President Donald Trump are planning a protest march in Washington, D.C.”

“March organizers, on the event’s website, said it serves as ‘a starting point to take a stand for science in politics’.”

“…The group’s mission statement is set to come out on Monday.”

“‘There are certain things that we accept as facts with no alternatives’, the statement said. ‘The Earth is becoming warmer due to human action…’”

Well, all right, that’s that. No alternatives.

Debate would be subversive.

Official science is the only science.

But oops; all along, there have been dissenters from the manmade warming mantra; they just haven’t been allowed inside government and media portals.

Freeman Dyson, physicist and mathematician, professor emeritus at Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow of the Royal Society, winner of the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, the Fermi Award: “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies [in climate change models] between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger. It’s clear now the [climate change] models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago… I’m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this [climate change] issue, and the Republicans took the right side…” (The Register, October 11, 2015)

Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming: “The computer models just weren’t reliable. In fact, I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy, this climate change.” (The Guardian, September 30, 2016)

And these are but a tiny fraction of the statements made by dissident scientists who reject manmade global warming.

The science is only settled in government/media circles, where leaders have climbed on board the Globalist plan to undermine economies all over the world by grossly lowering energy production, as a way to “reduce warming.”

One of the major warming hustlers is, of course, Al Gore. Every movement needs such men.

In 2001, Al was worth less than $2 million. By 2012, it was estimated he’d locked up a nice neat $100 million.

How did he do it? Well, he invested in 14 green companies, who inhaled—via loans, grants and tax relief—somewhere in the neighborhood of $2.5 billion from the federal government to go greener.

Therefore, Gore’s investments paid off, because the federal government was providing massive cash backup to those companies. It’s nice to have friends in high places.

For example, Gore’s investment firm at one point held 4.2 million shares of an outfit called Iberdrola Renovables, which was building 20 wind farms across the United States.

Iberdrola was blessed with $1.5 billion from the Federal government for the work which, by its own admission, saved its corporate financial bacon. Every little bit helps.

Then there was a company called Johnson Controls. It made batteries, including those for electric cars. Gore’s investment company, Generation Investment Management (GIM), doubled its holdings in Johnson Controls in 2008, when shares cost as little $9 a share. GIM and Gore sold when shares cost $21 to $26—before the market for electric-car batteries fell on its head.

For a while, the going was good. To make it go good, Johnson Controls had been bolstered by $299 million dropped at its doorstep by the administration of President Barack Obama.

On the side, Gore had been giving speeches on the end of life as we know it on planet Earth, for as much as $175,000 a pop. (Gore was constantly on the move from conference to conference, spewing jet fumes in his wake.) Those lecture fees can add up.

So Gore, as of 2012, had $100 million.

The man has worked every angle to parlay fear of global-warming catastrophes into a humdinger of a personal fortune. And he didn’t achieve his new status in the free market. The federal government has been helping out with major, major bucks.

This wasn’t an entrepreneur relying exclusively on his own smarts and hard work. Far from it.

—How many scientists and other PhDs have been just saying no to the theory of manmade global warming?

2012: A letter to The Wall Street Journal signed by 16 scientists said no (see here and here). Among the luminaries: William Happer, professor of physics at Princeton University; Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology; William Kininmonth, former head of climate research at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.

And then there was the Global Warming Petition Project, or the Oregon Petition, that said no. According to Petitionproject.org, the petition has the signatures of “31,487 American scientists,” of which 9,029 stated they had Ph.Ds.

Global warming is one of the Rockefeller Globalists’ chief issues. Manipulating it entails convincing populations that a massive intervention is necessary to stave off the imminent collapse of life on Earth. Therefore, sovereign nations must be eradicated. Political power and decision-making must flow from above, from “those who are wiser.”

Globalists want all national governments on the planet to commit to lowering energy production by a significant and destructive percentage in the next 15 years—“to save us from a horrible fate.”

Their real agenda is clear: “The only solution to climate change is a global energy-management network. We (the Globalist leaders) are in the best position to manage such a system. We will allocate mandated energy-use levels throughout planet Earth, region by region, nation by nation, and eventually, citizen by citizen.”

The New York Times, the “paper of record,” published a very interesting piece on January 26, 1989. The headline read: “US Data since 1895 Fail to Show Warming Trend.” (An earlier article of mine on it here.)

Here are a few key paragraphs:

“After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.”

“While the nation’s weather in individual years or even for periods of years has been hotter or cooler and drier or wetter than in other periods, the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend in one direction or another.”

“The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters. It is based on temperature and precipitation readings taken at weather stations around the country from 1895 to 1987.”

Then comes the revisionist stepping-back from the explosive finding:

“Dr. Kirby Hanson, the meteorologist who led the study, said in a telephone interview that the findings concerning the United States do not necessarily ‘cast doubt’ on previous findings of a worldwide trend toward warmer temperatures…He said that the United States occupies only a small percentage of Earth’s surface and that the new findings may be the result of regional variations.”

Actually, later in the Times article, “Dr. James E. Hansen, director of National Aeronautic and Space Administration’s Institute for Space Studies in Manhattan” offers this gem: “Another possibility, he [Hansen] said, was that there were special conditions in the United States that would tend to offset a warming trend. For example, industrial activity produces dust and other solid particles that help form liquid droplets in the atmosphere. These droplets reflect radiation away from Earth and thus have a cooling influence.”

But I suppose, through a REVERSE miracle, the droplets do allow heat generated at ground level to escape upward. If the droplets did trap heat at ground level, temperatures would rise—and the study showed the rise wasn’t occurring. More angels. The magic droplets deflect heat coming down, but not going up.

The Times had no follow-up questions.

But don’t worry, be happy. It’s all good. Yes, the warming hypothesis leads to carbon taxes, lowering energy output in order to keep us all from frying, and the consequent decimation of the economy—but look, people make mistakes. However, they mean well. They really do. And that’s what counts.

THEY’RE NOT USING A BOGUS WARMING HYPOTHESIS TO TORPEDO AMERICA AND THE REST OF THE WORLD, AS PART OF A GLOBALIST MACHINATION OF CONTROL. THEY DON’T WANT TO DECIMATE THE ECONOMY AND REDUCE US TO A HELPLESS STATE OF POVERTY.

They would never do that.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

26 comments on “Scientists march to support global-warming censorship: the New Ridiculous”

Such a dangerous meme, that science is about consensus-building! It is tied in to the over-arching meme of UNITY in all things, enforced unity, pretended unity, which is by definition fascism. Do we even remember where the word fascism comes from? It is derived from the Italian word “fascismo” and the related Latin “fascis” which means a bundle of rods. Not a collection of rods, but tied together, being forced together, forced UNITY. That’s fascism.

But the word is currently used to mean its opposite – daring to be different, to oppose the consensus. Trump is called a fascist precisely because he would divide the false consensus. That’s considered dangerous, reckless. Hey! This is liberty!

Massive earth changes are taking place at this time. There exists a “huge media blackout regarding supermoons, orbital and axis changes, quakes and tsunami”. Net search that sentence in quotations and you’ll find iron clad proof that our planet, and indeed our solar system is undergoing great change.

Quite a few years ago I watched Al Gore’s movie, but it was so full of holes that halfway I turned it off, as I started to fall asleep. The stories haven’t improved since.

The IPCC itself announced a year ago that the earth is cooling down, but they quickly added that “this is just a pause in the warming process”. Obviously they have psychic abilities there. I found it hilarious how they tried to prove themselves right when they first admitted they were wrong.

Let’s face it: every time climate scientists (who fully depend on climate change for their jobs) predicted warming it didn’t happen. So far they have been incorrect 100% of the time. These people live in Lalaland and their stay is generously funded by the tax payers.

We don’t need anyone to tell us that extreme weather is happening all over the planet. We see it every week or month on the news: tsunamis, floods, bug infestations, melting icecaps, rising temperatures as well as snow in places that never got it before. Al Gore’s CO2 studies are very compelling. The fact that he has profited from the need for alternative energy sources doesn’t mean it’s all a hoax. Anyone with an eye on trends could see that this was an area of demand that would increase.

I love your opening line, “We don’t need anyone to tell us …” Which means, we know what we know already, without any analysis. Exactly what they want to the public to do! Just give in to the imagery of the nightly news. Which, surprise, is exactly what you advocated in your comment!

A scientific study has to be more than “compelling.” Whatever that means. Maybe it is an apt word, since they want to compel us to accept their claims despite their fraudulent data (no question there) and their spectacularly failed predictions.

Anyone with an eye on trends (again, the nightly news) but not on actual results of alternative energy, of course would fail to see the hoax of the climate scam. Sister, you’re not ready for a real discussion yet with people who actually think.

I did’nt know Nuns were in the climate business. Did pope franny diversify…he’s a smart guy.
I think the CO2 rising is from all of those BLM people and their drinking soda pop on their marches. Soda pop has a lot of CO2. And I have heard a lot of burping in the youTube videos they do…
And the ice caps melting…well I have talked too Tim Hortens about their ice caps, and they say that global warming isn’t causing their ice caps to melt…it’s the heat from peoples hands, holding on to it too long, there ya go. One problem solved.

Al’s got a new movie out; have you seen it?
Part two, revenge of the Global warming.
I think it’s going to be a trilogy…whadja think sisters.

So..I got a nun joke. Wanna hear it?
Ok………

Q: How do you get a nun pregnant? A: Dress her up as an altar boy.

Hahahahaha…The priest that comes to my jam sessions told me that…too funny. His singing is crap but he plays a mean bass guitar.

History is the most damning evidence of all against the global warming narrative. Some of America’s most significant examples of environmental decline have been proven NOT to be the fault of (normal) human activity. In fact, it was the U.S. government conspiring with industry, NGOs, secret societies, etc. that caused the great decline in coastal fish species along both the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. For an excellent introduction into this ecological insult, check out “The Most Important Fish in the Sea” by H. Bruce Franklin. Though Franklin introduces his readers to the players most directly involved in this long-term crime committed against marine species and American citizens alike, he fails to trace this crime back to its origin and to discover the primary reason why this decline was allowed to happen (hint: it wasn’t simply a matter of greed). To fill in this missing puzzle piece, one has to venture down the rabbit hole and that leg of the journey departs from here: http://truthbetold.strangled.net/articles/tcmdatfom.html. It’s important to note that this article doesn’t trace the crime back to its origin either but only because it’s part one of an unfinished series. The next part would have gone on to expose not only that the origin of this crime was effectively 1871 when the U.S. Fish Commission was created (by the “Trojan horse” Smithsonian Institution), but also that the much suppressed American eugenics movement which was active for three decades beginning about 1900, was itself a “spin-off” of the earlier conservation movement! What makes this all the more significant is that we now know (see my linked to article above) that, contrary to what historians claim, the eugenics movement was in fact, a Malthusian movement in disguise! One last thing to note regarding Menhaden, “the most important fish in the sea”, it hadn’t taken long for the U.S. Fish Commission to begin its assault on them. The species was clearly under siege as early as 1892 (see http://truthbetold.strangled.net/events.php?page=3#id2395). Now, for a second example proving that we ordinary humans aren’t necessarily the ones to blame for environmental degradation, history again shows that the cause for the decline of the Alaskan fur seals of the Pribilof islands was, the U.S. government (in particular, the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, successor to the U.S. Fish Commission) working in collusion with others. Not long after the U.S. took control of the Alaska territory from the Russians (and control of the fur seals under the U.S. Fish Commission), a precipitous decline was noted in their populations. From about 1904, certain prominent individuals–some of whom were government officials effectively sworn to protect the nation’s natural resources, including the seals–were being accused of having conspired in a scheme to illegally exploit the fur seals, and proof of these allegations was brought out during subsequent congressional hearings. See http://truthbetold.strangled.net/events.php?page=5#id2464. Though criminal trials never materialized, my above-linked article provides some pretty good clues as to why this was the case. So don’t believe the global warming narrative for even a second–it’s nothing more than a fabrication intended to excuse everyone from the burden of having to think for themselves about what is really causing a decline in various segments of the environment while giving carte blanche to those in power to commit whatever heinous crimes against the environment they want without having to accept any blame. Nature needs our help and not just our pity and real help begins with learning the truth about our past. — the postman (truthbetold.strangled.net)

And even the glaciers are part of “The Great Conspiracy”.
.
Look at the deceit that has been involved in going from this:
.
to this:
.
Must have taken hours of Photoshop time.
.
Even the famous Matterhorn is part of “The Great Conspiracy”.
.
Claims about rising sea level are also part of “The Great Conspiracy”.
Look at what happens when somebody left their hose on and then “The Great Conspiracy” attributed it to Global Warming.
“Miami Beach Sea Level Rise, Paradise Lost!”
.
P.S. Here’s a hint. The real world is not interested in Global Warming Deniers’ fabricated conspiracies and/or their paranoia.

ICE MELTS!!…I thought glacial ice was special. I had a martini once shaken over glacial ice, cost me $15 at the Banff Hotel. I think it tasted different. It definitely tasted old.

I got an idea…how about we get all the people from BLM to lay side by side on the glaciers; like little black snow angels…to act as a albedo, sucking up all that evil sunlight and infrared, protecting the precious ice below it …whadja think Bill. Sorta like two protests in one. Oh yeah we could get the scientist on the march to lay down beside them and spread out their white lab coats; that would reflect some sunlight back, eh bill. Sometimes I get great ideas…Jon’s imagination exercises are really helping me.

I like the colored pictures better William. There’s trees growing now and the lake is such a nice emerald green…reminds me of Ireland in the springtime. Ya ever been to Ireland Bill…they don’t have glaciers, they ate em all during the famine. Is that deer at the edge of Lake Muir. Boy they look a lot better now, looks like there is lots of grass and shrubs now, their not as skinny…much, much better.

Btw are there fish in that lake Muir? Its probably a brand new lake, the fish arn’t thawed out yet. Cause I like fishing Bill. Do you know if they are selling (probably leasing) any nice lake lots, around that lake, for a reasonable price. Were is that by the way; is that ah, in Canada, or Alaska?
I could just see me and the little squeeze kayaking round the beautiful emerald green lake. Muffin talkin to me about her crochet patterns; me with my headphones on listening to Jon’s “Exit from the Matrix”. Stop for a little break, spark up a bomber, a little sip of that 12 year old Jameson I have in my little flask. Blow muffin a kiss, paddle on. Maybe stop have a picnic lunch, test out the new sleeping bag. Yeah, that a nice dream.

Listen, write me back about the lake properties Billy boy ASAP. …me and the squeeze are waitin.

Hey Mike as a resident of northern Canada since the early 70’s I’ve seen with my own eyes the undeniable fact that glaciers up here are in retreat. Just look up some info on the Mendehall Glacier in Juneau AK for a dramatic example. I think the changes here are far more dramatic than those down south. The only way glaciers will melt is that it’s warmer now on average than when they were forming. It’s the same story all across the northern hemisphere. There’s no denying average temperatures have risen in the north. The only room for debate is why. I’m sure I’m wasting my time trying reason with someone who obviously is much wiser than myself. All the best to you and muffin.

“The only way glaciers will melt is that it’s warmer now on average…” I can also change state, that is from solid to water vapor. Check it out in text books. How much is melt or sublimation, not sure. I have seen snow slowly disappear in the yard not due to temperature rise. It seems this explanation is not so easy.

Jon, as you are aware “global warming/climate change” is a monstrous misdirection campaign and I am glad you hinted at industrial pollution being the cause.

We know industrial pollution CAUSES cancer. In light of some rather uncomfortable discussions on the subject on another of your articles’ comments sections, I have decided to pen a new post “Coming Clean on Cancer” at https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com.

I may as well cover “fluorides” (sic), vaccines and “global warming” too.

There is another deception (hammered out by Dabid Icke, of “all” people). You see, they rely on climate records roughly 100 years old, although data 60 years prior was sufficient for survey purposes. It gets worse. In fact records on climate are “relatively good” (depending on which part of the world is being considered) for the last 800 years and even the Romans (pre 2000 years) kept records that might be translated into something meaningful (they did scientifically aggregate sun day).

Why are “they” “obfuscating” all those records going back 1000’s of years?

Well, there have been NO major solar temperature fluctuations and “science” would struggle to justify the Arctic/Antarctic ice fields as “natural”, if they took the records seriously. Indeed, GOD FORBID, those potty “drug induced” ancient text (Vedas and others) that talk of moons colliding with Earth, might offer the only, ARGHHHHH, logical explanation for the ice!

For instance, perfectly preserved mammoths have been dug up not only with undigested food in their stomachs, but one was still chewing berries as he was “snap frozen”. Ah Birdseye!

Physicist James Mccanney has designed a new type of wind generator, that is almost a complete departure from the highly inefficient 3-blade systems: the Mccanney Wing Generator. The Wings are scalable, from single family size all the way up to city-sized. An engineering firm has calculated that a 1000-foot diameter Wing would generate the equivalent of two 500-megawatt coal-fired power plants at ONE-PERCENT of the construction cost and at peak efficiencies (28-35mph) something in the neighborhood of 2.0 3.7 GIGAWATTS of energy: that’s 2 billion to 3.7 BILLION WATTS OF ELECTRICITY…..and every single watt pollution-free. All maintenance would be done at ground level and as an added bonus there would be little-to-no avian kill thanks to the unique design. The cost of energy would drop precipitously as the only expense after construction would be that of maintenance. Lower energy costs would be expressed across the board n transport, manufacturing, heating/cooling, etc. freeing the populace from overwork and concerns about mercury in our fish and radiation in our bodies.

Mr. Butler, it’s called climate. The world goes somewhat cooler then somewhat warmer. Been happening since the continents formed. Mankind is completely unable to instigate global climate change in any sustainable way aside from a nuclear winter, and even that is theoretical. Yes glaciers in the northern hemisphere are pulling back. Glaciers in the southern hemisphere are growing. We haven’t had a major hurricane hit the US in many many years. At some point one will hit the US and you will scream that’s proof of your theory since it hasn’t happened in about 10 years. Why not include earthquakes? They happen too – and wouldn’t it be a shame to waste a good disaster? Surely your ilk can some day find an imaginary connection between my Hummer and an 8.0 earthquake someplace.

Nah who told you that?
I thought is was “In God we Trust”. It’s right there on the back of the very holy one dollar bill.

*Donald Trump hand on the bible* Do you Donald Trump swear to uphold the office of the President of the…

There has never been a political system that was free from a church, religion or any spiritual endeavour.
Divine right to rule is the norm. It consecrates a government…
Even the athiest Soviet Union was the hybrid of the religions of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, the prophets of socialism and communism.

Politicized science is the new religion of global government.
Even the catholic church has taken 500 years and acquiested to scientism.
Their future lies with sciencism, or the abyss of obsolescence. Science has been used moreso to prove the church.

It is so revealing that these people have no regard for facts, only their theories, which have been proven wrong many times. It’s like so many other things in this world, it’s all about the money and power, don’t worry about facts, if they lie about it often enough, sheeple will believe it.

The scientists can’t even agree if it’s global warming or climate change or global cooling. According to the climate warming projection many countries were supposed to be underwater by now. So they changed their meme to climate change. Bad news is that climate always changes. Remember the ice age? The truth is climate change scam is about passing a global tax on everyone just like Canada has just done. Like taxing people are going to stop climate change. Seriously who believes this stuff.

Here in Oz (probably the same elsewhere) the media is complicit in these lies and anyone who dares question the ”scientists agree” meme is ridiculed and virtually written off as a nutjob. Nowhere is there any sensible discussion of alternative thought. How dare some neanderthal caveman think it ok to go against the mainstream brainwashing?!
“The worst thing to call somebody is crazy. It’s dismissive. “I don’t understand this person. So they’re crazy.” That’s bullshit. These people are not crazy. They strong people. Maybe their environment is a little sick.” – Dave Chappelle

There is NO Carbon climate forcing, NO sustainable energy and NO peak oil, the trifecta of elitist lies. No gas molecule can capture, store, redirect or amplify radiant energy. But the Alarmist BIG and Luke Little debate is fake, directed narrative.

“THEY’RE NOT USING A BOGUS WARMING HYPOTHESIS TO TORPEDO AMERICA AND THE REST OF THE WORLD, AS PART OF A GLOBALIST MACHINATION OF CONTROL. THEY DON’T WANT TO DECIMATE THE ECONOMY AND REDUCE US TO A HELPLESS STATE OF POVERTY.’

How will the “climate change” “agenda” turn us into slaves? …. I am quite clear that we are slaves already… but how by controlling energy…. don’t they already control energy? Don’t they already have confiscated all those patents that create free energy or others not dependent on the ones existing? What is wrong with replacing what exists – which pollute us anyway??? I really do want to understand…

I think you all should spell this out more wherever you go, so that people who support climate change will understand you, because if I don’t, they sure don’t.