Nokia RM-877 receives FCC stamp of approval: Could this be the 41MP EOS for AT&T?

The FCC recently approved the Nokia RM-877 that is compatible with AT&T's LTE bands, pentaband HSPA+/WCDMA and quad-band GSM/Edge. The FCC documents also not the device has NFC, Bluetooth and dual-band Wi-Fi.

Beyond that, there's not much more to go on but there is a strong possibility that this is the EOS Windows Phone aka 'Elvis' for AT&T. Nokia has requested all the juicy documents that have device photos, schematics, the user manual and device specifications to remain private. So for now, it's pure speculation that the RM-877 and the EOS are one in the same.

There is one schematic was included in the test reports that has the dimensions of the RM-877 being 5.13 inches tall and 2.81" wide. While thickness was not documented (which might have been a dead give away), the height and width is just a smidgen wider than the Lumia 920 which, if the leaked images hold true, is along the lines of what we are expecting the size of the EOS to be.

Could the RM-877 be Nokia's EOS Windows Phone? While there's no mention of a 41MP camera, there is mention in the FCC's public documents of a camera grip. Could a 41MP shooter warrant a camera grip accessory?

While this could go either way. There's just not enough meat on the bone to say for certain this is the EOS Windows Phone. But then again, there's nothing for certain to say it isn't the EOS. The good news is that we shouldn't have long to wait for the July 11th event that should shed a lot of light on things.

The camera on my Galaxy Nexus absolutely sucks. If this is the EOS, I'd gladly consider it, because I'm tired of my photos looking like trash (most of them, anyway). I can only imagine the photos a 41 MP camera would take =)

I got it because it was Android and cheap. I was a little tight on money, around November of last year. I had to get something fast, because I just switched from T-Mobile to Verizon. I read reviews about the camera, and I thought the reviewers were just being picky. Turns out, they weren't "just being picky" lol.

Also,https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=1991575
reveals that this comes with a new AC adapter, namely AC-60U (or AC-60). Mine which came with Lumia 920 is AC-50, which is their top of the line right now with 1.3A output. I assume this new one has even more output.
EDIT: looks like hotlinking to FCC is not possible, it is at attachment 6a, page 1.

My best guess so far is 1:1 port from the 808, whcih requires a companion chip inside the camera module which helps with the processing load.

In fact, I am not sure if even the snap 800 could handle the processing load required for oversampling during video recording. Yes, it does support the megapixel count, but there is more than that to it..

They're just model numbers like any other phone. The 9xx series is the highest end, followed by the 8xx series and so on. 920 is the model after the 900, and any number ending in a number other than zero is a variation of the same model AFAIK. So 925 and 928 are variations of the 920. The EOS probably won't be in the 92x series. Is that what you were asking?

You think you where pretty nice but actually you where condescending. Anyway, next time if you want to be nice leave out the low blows. BTW, not every has the time to read every article posted on the interwebs.

How is it possible that this phone is getting such a fast development to production cycle, compared to say the lumia 920 or is just the way I perceive things, supported by a crazy amount of media coverage?