xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from to

Commission file number 000-53655

TOUCHMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Georgia

20-8746061

(State or other jurisdiction

(I.R.S. Employer

of incorporation)

Identification No.)

3651 Old Milton Parkway

Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

(Address of principal executive offices)

(770) 407-6700

(Registrants telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x YES o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x YES o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o YES x NO

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 3,465,391 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of May 14, 2012.

The consolidated financial information included for Touchmark Bancshares, Inc. herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods. These statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

2.ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Reporting Entity and Nature of Operations

Touchmark Bancshares, Inc. (the Company, we, us or ours), a Georgia corporation, was established on April 3, 2007 for the purpose of organizing and managing Touchmark National Bank (the Bank). The Company is a one-bank holding company with respect to its subsidiary, Touchmark National Bank. The Bank is a national bank, which began operations on January 28, 2008 headquartered in Fulton County, Georgia with the purpose of providing community banking services to Gwinnett County, Dekalb, north Fulton and south Forsyth counties and surrounding areas in the State of Georgia.

Basis of Accounting: The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, shareholders equity and net income. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting by recognizing revenues when they are earned and expenses in the period incurred, without regard to the time of receipt or payment of cash.

Allowance for Loan Losses: Arriving at an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of judgment. The Companys allowance for loan losses provides for probable losses based upon evaluations of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. Due to our limited operating history, the loans in our loan portfolio and our lending relationships are of recent origin. In general, loans do not begin to show signs of credit deterioration or default until they have been outstanding for some period of time, a process known as seasoning. As a result, a portfolio of older loans will usually behave more predictably than a newer portfolio. Because our loan portfolio is new, the current level of delinquencies and defaults may not be representative of the level that will prevail when the portfolio becomes more seasoned, which may be higher or lower than current levels. If delinquencies and defaults increase, we may be required to increase our provision for loan losses, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions for loan losses and by recoveries of loans previously charged-off and reduced by loans charged-off.

The process of reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses requires management to make numerous judgments and assumptions about current events and subjective judgments, including the likelihood of loan repayment, risk evaluation, historical losses, extrapolation of historical losses of similar banks, and similar judgments and assumptions. If these assumptions prove to be incorrect, charge-offs in future periods could exceed the allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses may consist of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the collateral value, discounted cash flows or the observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of the loan. General allowances are established for non-impaired loans. These loans are assigned a loan category, and the allocated allowance for loan losses is determined based upon the loss percentage factors that correspond to each loan category.

The general reserves are determined based on consideration of historic and peer loss data, and the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. Risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment are as follows:

Construction and development loans  Loans in this segment primarily include real estate development loans for which payment is derived from sale of the property as well as construction projects in which the property will ultimately be used by the borrower. Credit risk is affected by cost overruns, time to sell at an adequate price, and market conditions.

Real estate - mortgage  The Company generally does not originate loans with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 85 percent and does not grant subprime loans. Loans in this segment are dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates will have an effect on the credit quality in the segment.

Commercial real estate  Loans in this segment are primarily income-producing properties. The underlying cash flows generated by the properties are adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased vacancy rates, which in turn, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Management monitors the cash flows of these loans.

Commercial and industrial loans  Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Stock Based Compensation: The Company has adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 718, Stock Compensation. Upon issuance of the Director and Organizer warrants, compensation cost was recognized in the consolidated financial statements of the Company for all share-based payments granted, based on the grant date fair value as estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718, which requires recognition of expense equal to the fair value of the warrant over the vesting period of the warrant. There were no options or warrants granted in the first quarter 2012.

The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility for the period has been determined based on expected volatility of similar entities. The expected term of warrants granted is based on the short-cut method and represents the period of time that the warrants granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected dividends are based on dividend trends and the market price of the Companys stock at grant date. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The Company recorded no compensation expense related to the warrants for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

At March 31, 2012, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to warrants. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2012 was approximately 5.77 years. The Company had 469,167 warrants exercisable as of March 31, 2012.

Through March 31, 2012, the Company issued 219,822 options to purchase common stock to employees of the Company or the Bank and the Company issued 10,000 options to purchase common stock to a new director. There were no options issued during the first three months of 2012 or 2011. Upon issuance of options, compensation cost is recognized in the consolidated financial statements of the Company for all options granted, based on the grant date fair value as estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718, which requires recognition of expense equal to the fair value of the options over the vesting period of the options.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility for the period has been determined based on expected volatility of similar entities. The expected term of options granted is based on the short-cut method and represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected dividends are based on dividend trends and the market price of the Companys stock at grant date. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to the options of $12,721 and $25,459 during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

At March 31, 2012, there was $39,290 of unrecognized compensation cost related to options outstanding, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.73 years. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options outstanding as of March 31, 2012 was approximately 7.59 years. The Company had 107,616 options exercisable as of March 31, 2012.

Income Taxes: Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities, and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is required when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income (in the near-term based on current projections), and tax planning strategies.

Statement of Cash Flows: The statement of cash flows was prepared using the indirect method. Under this method, net income was reconciled to net cash flows provided by operating activities by adjusting for the effects of operating activities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: For purposes of presentation in the statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents are defined as those amounts included in the balance sheet caption cash and due from banks. Cash flows from interest-bearing accounts with other banks, deposits, federal funds purchased and sold, and originations, renewals and extensions of loans are reported net.

Loans Purchased: Discounts and premiums on loans purchased by the Company are amortized based upon specific identification over the contractual life of the loan.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at March 31, 2012, by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

For the purpose of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the weighted-average contractual maturities of underlying collateral. The mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company had gross gains on sales of securities of $43,241 and gross losses on sales of securities of $3,056. The Company had gross gains on sales of securities of $90,312 and gross losses on sales of securities of $26,754 during the first quarter of 2011.

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:

Less than

More than

Twelve Months

Twelve Months

Total

Gross

Estimated

Gross

Estimated

Gross

Estimated

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Losses

Value

Losses

Value

Losses

Value

March 31, 2012:

Mortgage-backed GSE residential

$

(13,765

)

$

5,454,252

$



$



$

(13,765

)

$

5,454,252

$

(13,765

)

$

5,454,252

$



$



$

(13,765

)

$

5,454,252

Less than

More than

Twelve Months

Twelve Months

Total

Gross

Estimated

Gross

Estimated

Gross

Estimated

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Losses

Value

Losses

Value

Losses

Value

December 31, 2011:

Mortgage-backed GSE residential

$

(25,023

)

$

6,383,330

$



$



$

(25,023

)

$

6,383,330

$

(25,023

)

$

6,383,330

$



$



$

(25,023

)

$

6,383,330

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation.

At March 31, 2012, six debt securities have unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 0.25% from the Companys amortized cost basis. In analyzing an issuers financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysts reports. Although some of the issuers have shown declines in earnings and/or a weakened financial condition as a result of the weakened economy, no credit issues have been identified that cause management to believe the declines in market value are other than temporary. As management has the ability to hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.

Mortgage-backed securities GSE residential. The unrealized losses on the Companys investment in six mortgage-backed securities GSE residential were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual cash flows of those investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the Companys investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and because it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2012.

4.LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:

The composition of loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

March 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Construction and development

$

8,251,549

$

9,255,356

Real estate - mortgage

7,351,740

7,676,754

Commercial real estate

60,852,184

51,405,126

Commercial and industrial

4,572,278

7,282,319

Other

231,359

516,849

81,259,110

76,136,404

Unearned loan origination income

(87,003

)

(122,068

)

Allowance for loan losses

(1,652,347

)

(1,745,400

)

Loans, net

$

79,519,760

$

74,268,936

For purposes of the disclosures required pursuant to the adoption of amendments to ASC 310, the loan portfolio was disaggregated into segments. A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for loan losses. There are five loan portfolio segments that include construction and development, real estate  mortgage, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and other.

Construction and Development

Loans in this segment include real estate development loans for which the source of repayment is the sale of the property as well as construction projects in which the property will ultimately be used by the borrower. Total construction and development loans as of March 31, 2012 were 10.2% of the total loan portfolio.

Real Estate - Mortgage

These are loans secured by real estate mortgages. Total real estate mortgage loans as of March 31, 2012 were 9.0% of the total loan portfolio.

The commercial real estate portfolio represents the largest category of the Companys loan portfolio. These loans are primarily income-producing properties and are dependent upon the borrowers cash flow. Total commercial real estate loans as of March 31, 2012 were 74.9% of the total loan portfolio.

Commercial and Industrial

Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by business assets. Total commercial and industrial loans as of March 31, 2012 were 5.6% of the total loan portfolio.

Other

Loans in this segment are made to individuals and are secured by personal assets or unsecured. Total other loans as of March 31, 2012 were 0.3% of the total loan portfolio.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Historically, the bank used a combination of peer loss history and its own loss history for its various loan types in arriving at its allowance for loan and lease loss (ALLL). Management revisited the Banks methodology after the second quarter of 2011 for the purposes of determining the most effective means for arriving at an appropriate allowance for loan loss balance commensurate with the Banks size and level of complexity.

Management concluded that a loss migration analysis based on the Banks internal loan risk rating system provides a more precise and accurate estimate of potential losses within the loan portfolio. The basis for determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses under the revised methodology focuses on the Banks internal risk rated loss experience over a rolling eight quarter period as opposed to reliance on peer group data.

Impaired loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, by portfolio segment, are as follows: