Light passing through a single slit forms a diffraction pattern somewhat different from those formed by double slits or diffraction gratings. Figure 1 shows a single slit diffraction pattern. Note that the central maximum is larger than those on either side, and that the intensity decreases rapidly on either side. In contrast, a diffraction grating produces evenly spaced lines that dim slowly on either side of center.

Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\):(a) Single slit diffraction pattern. Monochromatic light passing through a single slit has a central maximum and many smaller and dimmer maxima on either side. The central maximum is six times higher than shown. (b) The drawing shows the bright central maximum and dimmer and thinner maxima on either side.

The analysis of single slit diffraction is illustrated in Figure 2. Here we consider light coming from different parts of the same slit. According to Huygens’s principle, every part of the wavefront in the slit emits wavelets. These are like rays that start out in phase and head in all directions. (Each ray is perpendicular to the wavefront of a wavelet.) Assuming the screen is very far away compared with the size of the slit, rays heading toward a common destination are nearly parallel. When they travel straight ahead, as in Figure 2a, they remain in phase, and a central maximum is obtained. However, when rays travel at an angle \(\theta\) relative to the original direction of the beam, each travels a different distance to a common location, and they can arrive in or out of phase. In Figure 2b, the ray from the bottom travels a distance of one wavelength \(\lambda\) farther than the ray from the top. Thus a ray from the center travels a distance \(\lambda / 2\) farther than the one on the left, arrives out of phase, and interferes destructively. A ray from slightly above the center and one from slightly above the bottom will also cancel one another. In fact, each ray from the slit will have another to interfere destructively, and a minimum in intensity will occur at this angle. There will be another minimum at the same angle to the right of the incident direction of the light.

Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\):Light passing through a single slit is diffracted in all directions and may interfere constructively or destructively, depending on the angle. The difference in path length for rays from either side of the slit is seen to be \(D \sin{\theta}\).

At the larger angle shown in Figure 2c, the path lengths differ by \(3 \lambda / 2\) for rays from the top and bottom of the slit. One ray travels a distance \(\lambda\) different from the ray from the bottom and arrives in phase, interfering constructively. Two rays, each from slightly above those two, will also add constructively. Most rays from the slit will have another to interfere with constructively, and a maximum in intensity will occur at this angle. However, all rays do not interfere constructively for this situation, and so the maximum is not as intense as the central maximum. Finally, in Figure 2d, the angle shown is large enough to produce a second minimum. As seen in the figure, the difference in path length for rays from either side of the slit is \(D \sin{\theta}\), and we see that a destructive minimum is obtained when this distance is an integral multiple of the wavelength.

Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\): A graph of single slit diffraction intensity showing the central maximum to be wider and much more intense than those to the sides. In fact the central maximum is six times higher than shown here.

Thus, to obtain destructive interference for a single slit, \[D \sin{\theta} = m \lambda,~for~m = 1, -1, 2, -2, 3,... \left(destructive\right), \tag{27.6.1}\] where \(D\) is the slit width, \(\lambda\) is the light's wavelength, \(\theta\) is the angle relative to the original direction of the light, and \(m\) is the order of the minimum. Figure 3 shows a graph of intensity for single slit interference, and it is apparent that the maxima on either side of the central maximum are much less intense and not as wide. This is consistent with the illustration in Figure 1b.

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Calculating Single Slit Diffraction

Visible light of wavelength 550 nm falls on a single slit and produces its second diffraction minimum at an angle of \(45.0^{\circ}\) relative to the incident direction of the light.

What is the width of the slit?

At what angle is the first minimum produced?

Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\):A graph of the single slit diffraction pattern is analyzed in this example.

Strategy:

From the given information, and assuming the screen is far away from the slit, we can use the equation \(D \sin{\theta} = m \lambda\) first to find \(D\), and again to find the angle for the first minimum \(\theta_{1}\).

We see that the slit is narrow (it is only a few times greater than the wavelength of light). This is consistent with the fact that light must interact with an object comparable in size to its wavelength in order to exhibit significant wave effects such as this single slit diffraction pattern. We also see that the central maximum extends \(20.7^{\circ}\) on either side of the original beam, for a width of about \(41^{\circ}\). The angle between the first and second minima is only about \(24^{\circ} \left(45.0^{\circ} - 20.7^{\circ}\right)\). Thus the second maximum is only about half as wide as the central maximum.

Summary

A single slit produces an interference pattern characterized by a broad central maximum with narrower and dimmer maxima to the sides.

There is destructive interference for a single slit when \(D \sin{\theta} = m \lambda,~ \left(for~m = 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, ...\right)\) where \(D\) is the slit width, \(\lambda\) is the light's wavelength, \(\theta\) is the angle relative to the original direction of the light, and \(m\) is the order of the minimum. Note that there is no \(m = 0\) minimum.

Glossary

destructive interference for a single slit

occurs when \(D \sin{\theta} = m \lambda, \left(for~m = 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, ...\right)\), where \(D\) is the slit width, \(\lambda\) is the light's wavelength, \(\theta\) is the angle relative to the original direction of the light, and \(m\) is the order of the minimum

Contributors

Paul Peter Urone (Professor Emeritus at California State University, Sacramento) and Roger Hinrichs (State University of New York, College at Oswego) with Contributing Authors: Kim Dirks (University of Auckland) and Manjula Sharma (University of Sydney). This work is licensed by OpenStax University Physics under a Creative Commons Attribution License (by 4.0).

Recommended articles

The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by MindTouch®and are supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739 and the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions, and Merlot. Unless otherwise noted, LibreTexts content is licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Have questions or comments? For more information contact us at info@libretexts.org.