Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Wichita, has introduced a bill - supported by the agriculture industry - to pre-empt states from passing mandatory labeling laws on genetically modified foods. The legislation is an attempt to stifle consumer demand for labels on food containing genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

The food industry has spent millions of dollars to defeat state-by-state GMO labeling initiatives. And those battles are far from over. Connecticut and Maine recently passed mandatory GMO legislation. Vermont, Oregon, Colorado, Massachusetts and others are in the process of trying to do so.

Why are so many states working on GMO labeling laws? Because increasingly, scientists and the medical profession are warning us that we don't know enough about the long-term impact of GMOs on our health. Recently, an international group of more than 90 scientists, academics and physicians released a statement saying there is no scientific consensus on the safety of GM foods and crops - despite industry's repeated claims that GMOs are safe.

More than 60 countries have banned GMOs, or require mandatory labeling of foods that contain GMOs. Yet in the United States, thanks to a steady influx of cash from industry lobbyists, consumers are kept in the dark - even though polls show that more than 90 percent of Americans want mandatory GMO labeling laws.

Agribusiness sectors have contributed almost $170,000 to Pompeo since he first ran for office in 2010, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The Grocery Manufacturers Association spent months shopping its bill on Congress. Politico reported in January that House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., was being courted by the food industry to introduce its bill. A spokeswoman for the committee confirmed that Upton planned to get more input before deciding whether to sponsor the bill. Once groups such as the Organic Consumers Association and Food Democracy Now reported that Upton might sponsor the industry-written legislation, consumers logged tens of thousands of calls to his office expressing outrage.

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

This material, provided for educational and informational purposes, constitutes a "fair use" of any copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. Organic Consumers Association is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. To support our work, please send a tax-deductible donation to: OCA, 6771 South Silver Hill Dr., Finland, MN 55603Activist or Media Inquiries (218) 226-4164. Text JoinOCA to 97779 to join our mobile network.