Since its inception, the traditional form of providing survivor benefits within public pension schemes has lost much of its legitimacy. As a result of fundamental changes in marriage behaviour and the typical division of labour between married spouses, offering noncontributory benefits of this kind could be seen as inequitable. Since these benefits usually substitute for non-derived pension entitlements based on the surviving spouse?s own contributions, they can also lead to incentive effects, especially for married women with some degree of labour-force attachment, that appear to be far from optimal. The present paper highlights this problem referring to institutional details and empirical results related to Germany and shows how it could be resolved by jointly annuitizing a given couple?s pension entitlements.

en_US

dc.language.iso

eng

en_US

dc.publisher

en_US

dc.relation.ispartofseries

CESifo working papers 1596

en_US

dc.subject.jel

J16

en_US

dc.subject.jel

J22

en_US

dc.subject.jel

H55

en_US

dc.subject.ddc

330

en_US

dc.subject.keyword

public pensions

en_US

dc.subject.keyword

survivor benefits

en_US

dc.subject.keyword

female labour supply

en_US

dc.subject.keyword

optimal taxation

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Rendite

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Geschlecht

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Frauenerwerbstätigkeit

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Sozialversicherungsbeitrag

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Optimale Besteuerung

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Schätzung

en_US

dc.subject.stw

Deutschland

en_US

dc.title

Survivor benefits and the gender tax gap in public pension schemes : observations from Germany