However, based on your previous communications I had no way to realize that the two of us shared this philosophy. Mistakenly, I assumed that you were most inclined to engage in a no-nonsense legal discussion, based on facts, law, reference to specific cases, etc. That was the reason I provided you such information - again - copied below.Do you also subscribe to levitation by meditation? Ever since the 1967 Abbie Hoffman success in levitating the Pentagon I have considered myself a fan of that technique as well.

Abbie Hoffman's Levitation of the Pentagon - by meditation, 1967.

Following your initial constructive comments, your contribution to a focused discussion on the matters themselves was eagerly anticipated, in re: False Imprisonment of Attorney Richard Fine and Demand for the immediate resignation of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski for perpetrating a Kozinski Fraud from the bench.

4) Glenn A Fine, Inspector General, US Dept of Justice , as an addendum to complaint about wide-spread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, and refusal of FBI and U.S. DOJ senior officers to accord Equal Protection, providing instead fraudulent responses to inquiries by U.S. Congress.

4) Other Inspector GeneralsAs an addendum to complaints about widespread corruption in Los Angeles County, and refusal of US government to enforce the law.

5) Mark J. Sullivan, Director, US Secret Service: As an addendum to request for investigation, pursuant to the US Secret Service mission statement and primary investigational jurisdiction - in safeguarding the integrity of the financial system - particularly - large computer systems.

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement._______________________________________

Subject: Timely response requested within 10 days. Request for clarifications in re: NEFs, General Order 08-02

December 7, 2009

Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the CourtU.S. Court, Central District of California

The favor of a response within 10 days was requested.

Dear Clerk Nafisi:

I am writing to ask your help regarding a short text, which I composed for Wikipedia, titled: Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (the URL is explicitly listed below):

Since the matter pertains directly to the conduct of your office, I would be grateful for any correction of errors, or any other comments that you would be generously willing to provide.

I heavily relied on my understanding of the records of the U.S. Court of the Central District of California. However, the figure, as you could see, was from another district, since I have never been able, to this date to gain access to any NEFs of the Central District of California. I wonder if you could help amend this obvious deficiency, and finally allow access to records that I have repeatedly requested. Alternatively - if you have any sample figure of a valid and effectual NEF that you would be willing to contribute for this article, it would be greatly appreciated, and also acknowledged.

I would be grateful if you could either confirm or refute the validity and effect, or lack thereof, of General Order 08-02, a key record, and provide a reasonable explanation why such record was posted online by your office with no signature, and no name of its author, not to mention any evidence of authentication.

I would be grateful if you could either confirm or refute the validity and effect, or lack thereof, of the "Unofficial Manual" for electronic filing at the Central District. Most other districts that I have inspected, had "official manuals". The Central District of California appeared unique in its lack of foundation for the operations of CM/ECF.

I would be grateful if you could either confirm, or refute the suggestion that the denial of access to NEFs at the Central District of California, was not unique at all, but rather - the outcome of coordinated efforts initiated by Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

Investigative Mission

The Secret Service was established as a law enforcement agency in 1865. While most people associate the Secret Service with presidential protection, its original mandate was to investigate the counterfeiting of U.S. currency, a mission the Secret Service is still mandated to carry out.

Today the agency's primary investigative mission is to safeguard the payment and financial systems of the United States. This has been historically accomplished through the enforcement of counterfeiting statutes to preserve the integrity of United States currency, coin and financial obligations.

To combat these crimes, the Secret Service has adopted a proactive approach that utilizes advanced technologies.

_____________________________

VISION STATEMENT

The vision of the United States Secret Service is to uphold the tradition of excellence in its investigative and protective mission through a dedicated, highly-trained, diverse, partner-oriented workforce that employs progressive technology and promotes professionalism.

MISSION STATEMENT

The mission of the United States Secret Service is to safeguard the nation's financial infrastructure and payment systems to preserve the integrity of the economy, and to protect national leaders, visiting heads of state and government, designated sites and National Special Security Events.

Bo Cutter’s Indictment of the Finance Industry

One Comment

Regardless of any assessment of Geithner as a person, and his performance as Treasury Secretary, the question that must be of interest is his ability to stem the hemorrhage, and effectively reduce the chances of catastrophic failure of the US financial system. Evidence suggests that the Obama administration failed so far to gain control of all government agencies. Some of the more critical - in law enforcement and banking regulation continue to conduct their business in a manner that is contrary to the interests of the people of the US, contrary to oaths of office of senior officers, and contrary to what would be considered rationale, sustainable policies. In short - recklessness still reigns high.

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/