Monday, May 31, 2010

Actress Files: Irene Dunne

Why I Waited: As with Lee Remick, checking off this performance meant signing off on a top-drawer roster, and I was sorry to see it go. Affection for Dunne, and hearsay that this was her favorite among her own movies, only amplified the anticipation.

The Performance: The first thing Irene Dunne does in Love Affair is say "I beg your pardon" through a porthole-shaped window connecting an enclosed hallway on a cruise-liner to an outdoor promenade. Why is that special? Because she says it in the quick, peremptory way that you'd actually say "I beg your pardon" in real life, and not as you would say it to a soulmate disguised as a stranger, whom you were meeting at the outset of a classic romance. Her character is called Terry, and the reason she has been hailed into conversation by Charles Boyer's Michel is that a gust of wind has just blown a telegram from his fiancée out of his hand and through this window; he's asking that she pass it back. Sizing up this charismatic, brutely handsome Continental and enjoying his embarrassment, especially after taking a glance at the ripely romantic telegram, Terry teases him to prove that the telegram is really his, forcing him to recite certain details. She's having a passing lark, like a woman who is used to entertaining herself on the spur of the moment with cheeky little dares and parries. She's also baldly flirting with someone she's never met, whom she can only see from the neck up, and about whom the only things she knows are 1) that he's engaged and 2) that he's rich enough to be with her on this boat. Within an instant, she seems like a pretty rare bird, and she has sized him up as one, too, ascertaining as well that they belong to the same flock. Thus, they have immediate bonafides as movie characters, and the makings of a high-flying, promising couple. Yet she's also the kind of woman who can say "I beg your pardon" like she's any woman, anywhere, talking to anyone.

Irene Dunne's appeal rests on such unusual fusions of the ordinary, the glamorous, and the subtly but defiantly odd. There are shots fairly early in Love Affair, while she's encased in a huge, armoire-shaped fur coat and coiffed in a matronly updo, when she looks a bit grandmotherly for a romantic lead. You can see why, as early as Cimarron, when she was eight years younger than she is in Love Affair she was so easily adaptable into old-age makeup. (She was in fact 41 when Love Affair opened, which should inspire a lot of Hollywood women, as well as their fans.) Dunne's air of strangeness has to do with how quickly she presumes familiarity and sets about seducing and needling men who are more "obviously" attractive than she is: Cary Grant, Charles Boyer, John Boles, Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. She takes liberties, verbally tickling them, looking fully confident that her rectangular smile, her mischievous gaze, her nutty hats, and her habit of throwing arch or exhausted "ah"s and "mm"s into her dialogue are as fetching as anything these matinée idols bring to the table. In her screwball and pseudo-screwball performances, but even in roles like the one in Love Affair, she comes across as a sort of tenuously acculturated version of Katharine Hepburn's Susan from Bringing Up Baby, pleased as punch to start a little trouble at any given moment, and it's both perplexing and funny that she can nonetheless transform in a second into a completely credible society type. One minute, in Love Affair, she's throwing a photographer's pictures into the ocean and having a dry, self-satisfied little chuckle about it. Three beats later, she's embodying the kind of woman who might need to worry if the gossip columns catch her scent, who would feel bad about breaking a rule if it hurt someone, or drew agitating attention to herself. Even if you don't know that Dunne was raised from solid, devout, Republican stock, you can feel her bone-deep handle on "proper" behavior in her performances, even the oneswhich is most of them, especially in the 30s, whether she's laughing, yearning, or cryingwhere she's one way or another tossing dart after dart at the bulls-eye of respectability.

But Dunne takes the road of Dolly Parton, letting us know that she will always love Michel by allowing Terry an absolute candor around him, in mirth and passion and sorrow. She banks on the power of sharp, clear, modest phrasing to signal concealed depths, rather than plunging right into them and dragging us along. Some actors congenitally suggest that one mustn't play two emotions at once or can only do so by pointing huge arrows at your own double-meanings. Dunne, though, manages a tinge of sexiness while being briskly funny, adopting a slurry Mae West timbre while dissuading Boyer from confiding his secret romantic angst. "I'm really not very good at that sort of thing," she drawls. "I talk a lot." There's no double-meaning here, just a tangy friskiness that packs more into the line than it's asking. When Ouspenskaya's benevolent dowager worries that Michel has missed out on romantic partnership because "he's been too busy...," Dunne is the perfect actress to complete the sentence ("...living?") in a way that preserves the tactful euphemism, appropriate to speaking with one's elders, while grinning that she knows just what "living" involves in this context, and that she's the last person to frown upon it. "I guess you and I have been more or less used to a life of pink champagne," she confides to Boyer's playboy, without an ounce of the censorious, compulsory Hollywood pretense that the rich, or at least the best among them, don't care about their money. Dunne's Terry is thrilled to have money, and aware that it won't be comfortable to proceed without it, even as she's sportingly up to the fresh challenge of earning her own.

An actor can't give us such complete frameworks for grasping a character's complex feelings, especially those that are germane to the whole plot of the film, without being able and willing at crucial times to tell a different story with her face than with her voice, or able to turn nimbly from one affect to another, as when Terry follows her dreamy citation of her father saying "Wishes are the dreams we dream when we're awake" with the dry-gin chaser of "He drank a lot." In a brilliant bit of direction, perfectly enacted by Dunne, Terry outlines the famous meet-atop-the-Empire-State-Building stratagem for rendezvousing with Michel six months in the future as though she really has lost her heart to him and she enjoys a good romantic cliffhanger... and at the same time, she's clutching her arms and bobbing up and down like it's very cold out there on the deck, so she ends the scene with a clipped, over-the-shoulder "Take care of yourself" as she dashes inside for warmth. Love Affair has enough of its barrels aimed at the summit of screen romance that Dunne, Boyer, and McCarey know that not every shot they take needs to hit that same target. We might even believe the scenario more fully, or care about the characters more richly, if their layers and peccadilloes drive the narrative, rather than allowing the abstract goal of just smashing our hearts dictate everything they say and do, and every way they do and say it.

Why not five stars, then? Well, the final third of Love Affair, where The Whitney Approach would really start going for brokeand I presume, sight unseen, that this is just what Deborah Kerr attemptsis a little less hospitable to Dunne. Her genius lies primarily in timing and in creative, multi-faceted interactions with her co-stars. Therefore, long sequences of her singing unmemorable songs in close-up, while Terry builds up her nest-egg as a nightclub chanteuse, prove an unexpected advert for Dunne's opera-trained soprano but otherwise don't give her anything to do creatively. I love her typical counter-intuition in diluting the performance just when so many actors would start pumping up the volume, and she is a godsend in the moment when Terry and Michel unexpectedly meet in a theater, each in another person's company, and in the short taxi-cab scene just afterward, when she insists as conversationally as possible that she really doesn't want Michel knowing about her waist-down paralysis. But in other, neighboring scenes, playing the ukulele and singing with a cadre of orphans, or negotiating for a job with the orphanage director, she looks a little bored without a more inspiring scene partner. One sign is the deflated way in which she reads some of her lines, even if this deflation is meant to register the ebb in Terry's spirit following her accident. It's just as revealing, though, that in these scenes Dunne reprises some of her oldest standby mannerisms from other performances, like her mischievous grin, with one fingernail resting on her teeth. Not in every moment of an Irene Dunne performance does she look unreservedly involved in what's going on. There are flashes of this habit even in the long final scene with Boyer, where she emotes very movingly in some of her close-ups, but you still sense that she'd be thrilled to do a little more of the talking.

Still, Dunne succeeds memorably in being amusing and aroused and resilient and regretful and somewhere close to ideal in Love Affair, without almost ever taking the most predictable paths toward any of these goals. At 88 minutes, Love Affair itself is as succinct as she is, covering a lot of ground without needing a lot of time, and proving, in perfect sync with its leading lady, that sly and disciplined pithiness can be just as powerfully moving as extravagant excess. At the midpoint of the movie and again in the closing moments, Dunne has to recite a line concerning "the nearest thing to heaven"I'm sure you can guess what that isand the sentiments feel too inescapably on-the-nose for a performer who so clearly prefers to arrive sideways into a screenplay's designs, or to tell the audience what we expect to hear through a counter-harmonic approach that only Dunne would conceive. We don't need to hear about the nearest thing to heaven when, left to her own devices, and furnished the proper companions, she has such a sparkling track record for getting us there herself.

14 Comments:

Mmh, I'm not so crazy about her here. But I am one of the few people in the world who is not crazy about Irene Dunne. I think she is fine in her part but for me, she never really does anything extraordinary and neither the boring script nor her lacking chemistry with Charles Boyer really help to improve her performance. But even though, she does what she has to do with style and grace.

Well, lovefilm are letting me watch this one online instantly, and for free, so between you, them and Irene, that's my bank holiday Monday afternoon (hopefully) brightened! I'll check back in when I've seen it...

I enjoy the way you've captured the diversity of Dunne's onscreen portfolio here. I'd always expected to dislike this film because the 50's remake with Kerr and Grant is so turgid. But Dunne saves the day -as she often does, keeping so many balls spinning through the air without ever breaking a sweat. One gets the impression she could simultaneously run a hatshop, chaperone a school dance, beat you at canasta - and still keep you chuckling AND smitten. Oddly,I've often found that when Dunne sings in films, she concentrates on the technicalities of the vocalizing, putting her acting on hold for the duration of the song. But I think her nightclub number in "Love Affair" (I think it's called "Sing My Heart") stands as an exception. She breezes in and out of it, in the process giving us a full-on, briskly glowing Dunne experience.

@Fritz: So, you're one of the guys Cavell is talking about. I'm not an unqualified admirer - at times she looks a bit self-satisfied to me, and her play for prestige projects in the mid and late 40s leaves me pretty cold. Still, I'm obviously seduced a lot of the time, and this was no exception.

@Tim: A bank holiday, Irene Dunne, and a free screening - more than enough to make up for the vague aroma of low-grade Ren&#233 Z. drifting through that comment...

@Ken: Writing this served yet another reminder that I need to track down Together Again, as per your suggestion. Love the image of Irene multi-tasking. As for "Sing My Heart": you put it better than I would have, but I think this is what happens during this number, even if she suffers the same lapse more conspicuously in other films. But I was surprised to learn while reading up that she had actually auditioned for the Met Opera earlier in her life, and given how little I'd have expected that based on her screen performances, maybe she was just too happy to show us what she could do to be worried about the performance. Given that she can sometimes seem a little bored by her own acting, I wonder if she was one of those types who never stops dreaming of the Plan A that didn't pan out, even after she discovered real genius amidst Plan B?

Oh not for lack of trying Nick. I've looked everywhere for I have been eternally (well, since 2004, when I really started WATCHING movies) curious of The Awful Truth and Theodora Runs Wild but such movies just never seem to make themselves available where I live (The Philippines).

At the same time, my ongoing quest to view every Oscar-nominated supporting actress performance does tend to distract me from checking out leading ladies such as Irene yet at the same time compels me to view bits of their filmography when they have been accompanied by their supporting cast to Oscar night. :)

Well, when you eventually come across her, then, in Anna and the King of Siam and I Remember Mama, trust that you're not getting the full experience. Love Affair will pay off better, but hopefully those screwballs will show up online somewhere.

I don't hear a lot of good things with I Remember Mama but I'll have to see it for myself eventually.

Small FYI from my quest: Susan Sarandon and Glenda Jackson are the worst Oscar-winning and multiple nommed leading ladies, having appeared in ZERO movies that have received Oscar's attention for supporting actress nominations. Bette Davis still holds the record at 12. Irene holds a decent 4.

Nick: I guess what I was trying to say was not that Irene Dunne actually stops acting during her singing numbers, but that - during those songs - her acting seems to lose its delicacy and airiness. I get the impression she's overly-focused on technicalities, intent on achieving some sort of musical correctness. And it's this kind of (I'd say) misguided prioritization that sometimes results in a sort of unwelcome stolidity. But I still think she avoids this completely in the "Love Affair" night club number. I find her super from start to finish. And, by the way,Nick, I'm intrigued by that theory you threw out - about Dunne eternally wistful about Plan A, even after Plan B turned out so beautifully. Sounds very plausible.

@Ken: Oh, I get you - I just like her less in the "Sing My Heart" number than you do, such that your description of what happens in the other singing sequences winds up capturing exactly what I did find deflating in the "Sing My Heart" episode. But I understand you don't agree.

Excellent piece on another one I’ve never seen, or don’t care to. I’m not sure where I stand on Dunne. She’s excellent in The Awful Truth but I don’t find her enticing enough to run out and see all she’s done. I remember An Affair to Remember in spots recalling clearly only that Deborah Kerr – whom I adore, and Cary Grant who like as much do not make the perfect couple. Then there’s the other remake with Bening and Beatty (another couple I love). They’re perfectly matched chemistry wise, but it just feels like a trudge through an innocuous and altogether bland piece where Katharine Hepburn seems decidedly embarrassed to have a part in it.

We'll call that the Whitney Houston way to play the part, and make no mistake that I(IIIII-ee-IIIIII-ee-IIIIII....) can be a sucker for that stuff. Favourite line of the last few episodes.

I'm marginally interested in catching up with the Beatty/Bening version now that I've seen the original, but I just can't get motivated to see the Kerr/Grant version that's by far the most famous iteration. Maybe Sleepless in Seattle killed it for me.

Reading the Bromance: Homosocial Relationships in Film and Television ($32/pbk). Ed. Michael DeAngelis. Wayne State University Press, 2014.
Academic pieces that dig into recent portraits in popular media, comic and dramatic, of intimacies between straight(ish) men. Includes the essay
"'I Love You, Hombre': Y tu mamá también as Border-Crossing Bromance" by Nick Davis, as well as chapters on Superbad, Humpday, Jackass, The Wire, and other texts. Written for a mixed audience of scholars, students, and non-campus readers. Forthcoming in June 2014. "Remarkably sophisticated essays." Janet Staiger, "Essential reading for anyone interested in contemporary models of gender and sexuality." Harry Benshoff

Fifty Key American Films ($31/pbk). Ed. Sabine Haenni, John White. Routledge, 2009. Includes my essays on
The Wild Party,
The Incredibles, and
Brokeback Mountain. Intended as both a newcomer's guide to the terrain
and a series of short, exploratory essays about such influential works as The Birth of a Nation, His Girl Friday, Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song,
Taxi Driver, Blade Runner, Daughters of the Dust, and Se7en.

The Cinema of Todd Haynes: All That Heaven
Allows ($25/pbk). Ed. James Morrison. Wallflower Press, via Columbia University Press, 2007. Includes the essay
"'The Invention of a People': Velvet Goldmine and the Unburying of Queer Desire" by Nick Davis, later expanded and revised in The Desiring-Image.
More, too, on Poison, Safe, Far From Heaven, and Haynes's other films by Alexandra Juhasz, Marcia Landy,
Todd McGowan, James Morrison, Anat Pick, and other scholars. "A collection as intellectually and emotionally
generous as Haynes' films" Patricia White, Swarthmore College

Film Studies:
The Basics ($23/pbk). By Amy Villarejo. Routledge, 2006, 2013. Award-winning
film scholar and teacher Amy Villarejo finally gives us the quick, smart, reader-friendly guide to film vocabulary that every
teacher, student, and movie enthusiast has been waiting for, as well as a one-stop primer in the past, present, and future of film production, exhibition,
circulation, and theory. Great glossary, wide-ranging examples, and utterly unpretentious prose that remains rigorous in its analysis;
the book commits itself at every turn to the artistry, politics, and accessibility of cinema.

Most recent screenings in each race;
multiple nominees appear wherever they scored their most prestigious nod...
and yes, that means Actress trumps Actor!

This Blog Sponsored by...

Chicagoans! This site doesn't even accept advertising, but I'm making an unsolicited exception for the
best, freshest, most affordable meal you can enjoy in the Loop, at any time of the day, whether
you're on the go or eager to sit. Cuban and Latin American sandwiches, coffees, pastries, salads,
shakes, and other treats. Hand-picked, natural, and slow-cooked ingredients. My friendly neighborhood
place, a jewel in my life even before the Reader and Time Out figured it out. Visit!

Watch this space! Chicago has a new, exciting, important, and totally accessible cadre of queer film critics who are joining forces to
bring screenings, special events, and good, queer-focused movie chats to our fair city. Read our mission!
Stay tuned for events! Cruise the website, and help
get this great new group off the ground by enrolling as a friend (it's free!) and by asking how you can help.