Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!

Friday, December 21, 2012

Saudi
men are now receiving automatic text messages from the government
whenever their wives exit the country. It is part of a new program to
electronically track women and ensure that they don’t leave the country
without permission from their male “guardians”. The response from
liberal feminists in the West? Silence.

Saudi Arabia constitutes one of the most oppressive regimes in modern
day history. It is known for its notorious human rights violations
such as public beheadings, its extreme persecution of religious
minorities, and its policies of gender apartheid, all of which are based
on its stringent interpretation of Islamic law, or Sharia.

Already, the law requires that women be covered from head to toe in
burkas when in public, that unrelated men and women cannot mingle, and
that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s. In divorce,
child custody goes automatically to the man. Inheritance laws favor
sons over daughters. The list goes on and on. In short, women are
treated as little more than chattel.

But this isn’t enough for the Saudi government. So, recently, it
implemented a practice whereby a male “guardian” is notified with a text
message every time his wife or daughter leaves the country.
It has always been the case in Saudi Arabia that women, all of whom
are referred to as “dependents”, (along with children and foreign
workers employed by individuals), must obtain written permission from a
male relative or other male guardian before being able to work, attend
university, obtain necessary medical procedures or leave the country.

In 2010, the Ministry of the Interior implemented several initiatives
to “update” the “efficiency” of the guardianship program, making it
easier for guardians to authorize a dependent’s departure by, for
example, allowing men to fill out permission forms online rather than
producing the paperwork in person.

Additionally, men had the choice of opting into a program whereby
they would be notified whenever their “dependents” crossed the country’s
borders.

But in recent weeks, this notification program has been changed to
automatically send text messages to men even when they did not sign up
for the program. Thus, all male guardians in Saudi Arabia now receive a
text message when their wives or daughters cross the border, even if he
happens to be travelling alongside her.

The change in policy was prompted by an incident where a 28-year-old
woman used falsified documents to escape Saudi Arabia. Reportedly, she
had converted from Islam to Christianity, a capital offense under Sharia
law. She fled to Sweden, presumably to evade punishment.
Subsequently, the Saudi government made SMS notification official policy
rather than elective.
One husband, who had been notified of his wife’s border crossing as
he accompanied her, was alarmed by the notification. He alerted
al-Sharif, a women’s rights activist, of the new policy.

Al-Sharif became famous, or infamous, depending on one’s viewpoint,
when she uploaded a YouTube video of herself defying the government’s
prohibition on women’s driving. Saudi Arabia is the only country in the
world that prohibits women from driving. Last year, numerous Saudi
women, who defied this ban, including Al-Sharif, were arrested and
jailed. Al-Sharif was subsequently released on bail, so long as she
promised not to drive again or speak to the media.

Upon learning about the government’s e-tracking of women, she sent
out tweets with the news, which were met with outrage from both men and
women in Saudi Arabia. Reply tweets made proclamations like, “[H]ello
Taliban, here with some tips from the Saudi e-government” and “[W]hy
don’t we just install a microchip into our women to track them around?”

Instead of making the guardianship system hi-tech, Saudi Arabia should be phasing it out.
It’s ironic that one of the richest, most technologically advanced
countries in the world is using technology to ensure that its human
rights, morality, and treatment of women does not progress past that of
the 7th century. The more advanced technology gets, the more backward and controlling of women becomes Saudi Arabia.

Meanwhile, feminists in the West, especially in America, don’t realize how good they have it.
There are constant cries of “sexism” or accusations of male
patriarchy every time a man compliments a women’s legs (“objectifies”
her), or an older boss innocuously puts his hand on an employee’s
shoulder (“sexually harasses” her), or a man provides his wife with an
opportunity to be a stay-at-home mother (“devalues” her).

Some men are afraid to open doors for women or pay for them on dates
out of fear of “insulting” today’s “emancipated” women. And supervisors
may go overboard in censoring the workplace out of fear of being
slapped with a sexual harassment lawsuit.

Yes, feminists in the West have made themselves clear: treat them like men or they don’t consider themselves equal.

Yet, women in Saudi Arabia are legally infantilized by the
guardianship system in Saudi Arabia and treated as less than second
class citizens in most of the Islamic world. Real human rights for
women just plain do not exist under Sharia law.

It is true that the Sharia does not directly address text messages or
driving. However, the humiliation, excessive control of women, their
subjugation and general deprivation of freedom as manifested in policies
such as airport e-monitoring, certainly derive from the gender
inequality based in Islamic law.

Yet, the technological advancement used to tighten control of women
even further produces not a peep from the Gloria Steinem’s of the West.
Though Saudi feminists are outraged, when it comes to true sexism based
in Islamist ideology and culture, liberal feminists in the West are, as
usual, silent. Mum’s the word.

Deborah Weiss, Esq. is an investigative journalist with FrontPage
Magazine and The Washington Times. She is co-author of "Saudi Arabia
and the Global Islamist Terrorist Network" (Palgrave MacMillan, 2011). A
partial listing of her work can be found at www.vigilancenow.org

Post a Comment

http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law

We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org

The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.

The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.