Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether Trial Defense Counsel's assistance was incompetent and if so, whether standard representation would have made a difference.
A. Whether the Trial Defense Counsel unreasonably failed to obtain forensic testing of the Defendant's textiles.
B. Whether the Trial Defense Counsel unreasonably failed to present evidence regarding the firing of the Remington 870.
C. Whether the Trial Defense Counsel unreasonably failed to present evidence that would have decisively contradicted the State's theory of a the chronology of events.
II. Whether Klose was denied access to relevant information or evidence by Kropp, Mackenzie, or Department of Corrections.