>>Sounds like
>>there's still some corrupted files in the vm section. :-)
>
>actually, i don't think so. diffing against last week's
>files would show you something interested... exactly three
>things changed:
> (1) indentation/spacing on some of the macros
> (2) capitalization of some of the macros
> (3) the locations in the headers of some of the prototypes
> and/or type definitions (and then, not in a significant
> way).
>
>There's nothing significant different between this week's and
>last week's vm code. (actually, from the looks of it, it should
>compile into the same code!)
>
>
>cgd
Update: I deleted all my kernel sources and re-supped the whole tree.
Everything is working just dandy with a kernel I built this morning.
What bothered me was that the kernel that died yesterday was straight
from the latest ksrc tar file. Maybe 1) I had something old laying
around that it grabbed while building, or 2) the scanner somehow
missed a certain file that was important.
Either way, everything is working as advertised now.
--Michael
P.S. (cgd) the patched route.c seems to be working just fine. I added
and deleted a bunch of static routes with no crashes. Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon Iowa State University Computation Center
michaelv@iastate.edu Project Vincent Systems Staff
Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free Un*x for PC/Mac/Amiga/etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------