Implementing the "family law act of 1970" caused the
divorce rate to jump almost 40% in just one year.

21
million Americans
died as
a direct result of this increased divorce rate, including
one million divorce related suicides and one million divorce
related homicides in the 20th Century alone.

8
million of these deaths were due solely to the 44%
increase in the premature mortality rate of the
children of divorce.

Altogether, feminists cost
55,000,000 American Lives in the Twentieth Century.

Our
divorce rate is four times higher than countries like
Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan--and
Afghanistan!

Feminism, the "right to commit
adultery",
is an abomination before God!

In the four minutes it
will take you to read this page, eighteen more fellow
Americans will be divorced, and nine will die as a direct result of that
divorce, which means that giving American women legal rights was
tantamount to mass genocide. The US Surgeon General reports that
divorce is a bigger health risk to men
than smoking tobacco. The Centers for Disease Control report that
divorce triples the risk of suicide.
Twelve different scholarly studies demonstrate that divorce
significantly increases the premature mortality of
fathers, mothers, and the children of divorce.

Divorce and
illegitimacy put almost half of the nation's children in fatherless
households where they are up to 73 times more likely to be fatally abused. One child of divorce dies prematurely for each 15 divorces in the
US. The increased divorce rate in the US killed 21 million Americans
in the 20th Century alone. Each additional one hundred divorces nationwide
parallels five additional suicides, ten additional murders, twenty
additional rapes, and three hundred more men in prison. The fifty fold
increase in the US divorce rate paralleled a ten fold increase in the
murder rate and a seventeen fold increase in the incarceration
rate.

Divorce contributed to
the increase in the percent of US managers and administrators who are
women from 19% to 43%, which decreased the purchasing power of the
average American family by two thirds. It caused a $7 trillion
increase education spending at the same time that SAT Scores decreased 98
points, putting the US DEAD LAST in TIMSS. It
contributed to the US having the industrial world's only negative Personal
Savings rate, reducing the net worth of the average American household
to a negative $77,000
each. It contributed to our record high personal and corporate bankruptcy
filings.

Worldwide, each
additional one hundred divorces parallels
two additional suicides, one additional
murder, six
additional rapes, thirty
three additional armed robberies, and puts one hundred more men in
prison.

Feminism, the "right
to commit adultery", the unwarranted demand for legal rights for women,
the root cause of divorce, an abomination before God,
must be outlawed and female
criminals must be punished. Blind dumb feminists cannot
point to one single economic or social statistic with pride and say "It
was all worth it".

The tendency of women
to divorce increases as their legal rights are increased. Countries
which have not granted legal rights to women have divorce rates one tenth
as high as the US.

The divorce rate in
the US increased fifty-fold since women were given legal
rights. Women's rights is the worst thing that ever happened to America, even
worse than the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Feminism is the rot of
American society, which has fueled abortion, divorce, lesbianism and
hatred of men in our nation...

The only reason
why the divorce rate seems to have slowed in recent decades
is because people simply aren't getting married any more.
They're shacking-up instead.

All that is being promoted on
television these days is lust, dirty-mindedness, fornication and
adultery. Courtship and marriage are ridiculed and thought to be
too old fashioned. America is a sex-perverted nation!

The increase in our murder and
suicide rates correlates closely to the increase in our divorce rate,
which is clearly the result of granting American women legal
rights.

Within the US, state to state divorce and suicide rates demonstrate
that there is one additional suicide for each additional 25
divorces. In other words, when a judge grants 25 divorces, he is
directly responsible for one additional suicide in this
country.

The overall increase in premature
mortality over the long term results in the death of one American for each
two divorces.

Don't Count on
Government to Solve the Problem

The "leveling off" of the US divorce rate isn't a sign of
some kind of an improvement, but rather a change in the importance that
your government attaches to the collection marriage and divorce data, the
simplest data in the world to collect, something that even Rwanda and
Haiti have managed to accomplish. The real message is that the
problem is now so obviously out of control that the National Center for
Health Statistics, by FALSELY claiming that "budgetary considerations
necessitated this action", can now disband this responsibility and simply
refer visitors to the US Census Bureau. But the US Census Bureau, in
keeping with the grand tradition of failed empires, now refers you BACK to
the original source, claiming that "these data must be obtained from the
National Center for Health Statistics". These worthless government
statistical sources can tell us exactly how many TV sets there are on an
Arapaho Indian Reservation, but claim to know nothing about the most
serious implosion of a society since Babylon fell.

The U.S. Census Bureau does provide the current marital status of
persons, by age, sex, and race and the estimated median age at first
marriage for men and women at the U.S. level. Reports are also published
from special studies which collect data on the marital history of the
population.

The U.S. Bureau of the Census is another Federal source of marriage
and divorce statistics. Census data are survey- rather than records-based
and cover many aspects of marriage and divorce patterns in the United
States.

Marriages (per the well hidden table published by the
State of California, Department of Health Services April 1,
1980)

Divorces

Difference (Divorces Minus Marriages)

Years

45,070 in
1940

48,897 in
1946

+3,827

6

79,360 in
1950

81,544 in
1969

+2,184

19

105,352 in
1960

112,942 in
1970

+7,590

10

136,090 in
1965

137,881 in
1979

+1,791

14

128,489 in
1975

166,645 in
1990 (US Stat Abstract)

+38,156

15

And what does the
State of California do to warn men of the devastating effects of getting
married, inevitably getting divorced, and losing all assets to lawyers in
the process?

LIES, LIES,
LIES!

LIES AND MORE
LIES!

The Official
California Home Page for "vital statistics" doesn't even include marriage
and divorce
data!

Instead of warning men
about the dangers of marriage, the media prints completely misleading
stories, saying things like "the divorce rate decreased by 11.5% between
1980 and 1994". Now, that is technically correct, but it fails to
note the even more important point that the marriage rate decreased 14.2%
during that same timeframe. It's incredibly misleading to infer that
this a trend towards social stability when it is in reality a net increase
in the divorce rate of 2.7%.

Do blind dumb
feminists not realize this before they publish such trash? Did they
even bother to check it out before they allowed it to go to print?
Did they check it out but not understand the data? Did they take
this risk of discrediting themselves by hoping that the data was correct,
or that they wouldn't get caught?

The answer is in the
TIMSS study, which illustrated that it's not relevant whether or not they
attempted to cross check their data, because TIMSS shows that zero percent
of American 12th grade girls were able to correctly solve math problems
identical to this one. Even if they had tried to check it out, there
is a 100% probability that they couldn't have understood the point anyway,
so why bother?

Nobody has a higher divorce rate than the
US. The next highest country is Sweden, whose divorce rate is half
of ours. It is fifty times higher now than it was before the blind
dumb feminists met in Seneca Falls. In just one year in California,
1969-1970, it jumped 40%. If the feminists hadn't done their dirty
deed in Seneca Falls it would be in the range of Japan, China, Mexico,
Italy, Brazil, El Salvador, and Sri Lanka today.

The 13 fold increase
in the divorce rate this century paralleled an unprecedented 8 fold
increase in our murder rate. Around the world today, in 15
industrialized nations, 100 additional divorces cause one additional
murder, 6 additional reports of rape, 33 additional armed robberies, and
100 more men in prison. These are costs which society, not
feminists, must pay. Putting one man in prison removes 2 men from
the labor force (the inmate and one more criminal justice system
employee), plus adds the cost of the employee's salary and benefits to the
already overburdened Public Debt. This is a net
cost to GDP of 3 man-years, so having 1.8 million men in prison subtracts
4.8 million man-years from GDP, which is 4%. If we had an
incarceration rate equivalent to Japan or China, we would be spending 0.2%
of GDP for prisons, which means that mopping up after feminists puts the
entire US workforce at an immediate 3.8% cost disadvantage in the Global
Economy.

Kathleen Parker almost had this
right, but as is the case with most feminists, she completely
misrepresented the real magnitude of the problem of divorce at the end of
an otherwise credible article:

Kathleen Parker wrote: In the
United States, a country where one in two children will live in a
single-parent home at some point in childhood -- and where, each year, 1
in 60 sees their parents divorce -- we need to make some accommodation
for children's voices.

87 million Americans have gotten
divorced since 1950, which is almost a third of the current population.
Considering those who have gotten divorced more than once, there were an
average of 1.8 children per divorce, which is 156.6 million children of
divorce. Of course most of them are over the age of 18 now and thus aren't
"children" any longer.

But 51.4 million of those who are
divorced today have gotten divorced since 1980, which involved 92.5
million children. Since there are only 68 million children (those under 18
years old) in the US today, it would be a lot more accurate to say that
almost every child in this country has been affected by divorce, rather
than "1 in 60 sees their parents divorce" each year.

Only 26 million of these children live with "two
parents", but the mothers with whom 15 million of these children are
living have been divorced and are now living with men who are not the
biological fathers of their children. In other words, the 11
million children living with both biological parents are now a 16%
minority.

As a cross-check to the above
calculations, note that DHHS reports that there were 41,344,400 divorces
in the US in the Twentieth Century which adversely affected 62,016,600 children. One of the adverse effects is a 44%
increase in their premature mortality rate compared to children raised by
two biological parents in an intact family. 213 million of the 284
million Americans are adults, so these children of divorce now constitute
29% of the adult population. There were 1,736,018 premature deaths
in the US in 1996 (deaths of citizens below the age of 75, their average
life expectancy), which is a premature mortality rate of 660 per 100,000
population. The premature mortality rate of the 151 million adult
Americans raised in intact families is 585, whereas that for the 62
million adult Americans who were raised in broken homes is 842 [.71X +
1.44 x .29X = 660, X = 585, 1.44X = 842].

If these 62 million had a
premature mortality rate equal to those raised in intact families, then
159,340 fewer of them would die prematurely each year [(842 - 585) x 62
million = 159,340], and 8 million fewer would have died in the Twentieth
Century alone.

Copyright @ 2005 by
Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party

When Women are in Charge, Wickedness
Flourishes

By David J. Stewart

I
recently read that champ golfer Tiger Woods (whose wife divorced him
last year) is tearing down their $12,300,000 mansion to rebuilt
something she likes better. She says the mansion has a terminate
problem. What really bothered me was that the rotten newsmedia said
Elin's new home will be “termite and Tiger free.” Isn't that a shame!
American society has no respect for the sacredness of marriage at all.
Feminism teaches women to discard husbands who sin and make mistakes, as
old rubbish, an old paid of torn shoes or taking out the trash.

Jesus
taught in Matthew 18:22 to forgive, not seven times, but seventy times
seven times. That's unlimited forgiveness, just as God unconditionally
loved us and sent His only begotten Son to Calvary to pay our sin debt.
Any guilty sinner who comes to Jesus Christ, no matter how deep in sin
they may have gone, will be forgiven and given eternal life (John 20:31;
Acts 10:43 - King James Bible).

Just
as the prophet Hosea forgave Gomer, who abandoned him to commit
whoredoms, buying her back at a slave auction... so did Jesus Christ
redeem us from the slave-market of sin! Christ sets the example for us
to follow... forgiveness! In cases of marital infidelity, Christians
ought to have the spirit of Hosea, who took his fallen spouse back and
nurtured her with love and reunion. Amen!

The
government punishes married couples in dozens of ways financially for
getting married (including at tax-time, those receiving disability
benefits, if your spouse receives state care, et cetera). In every
state, by law, the government is a legal 3rd party entity in all
licensed marriages. Yes, you are also married to the state!

In
addition, the feminist LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered)
courts these days unfairly crucify men in divorce court. Lesbian judges
are common now. Women don't think reasonably when they do men's jobs,
because they were created by God to be emotional, submissive and sweet.
So instead women become cruel and unjust in men's roles. Men on the
other hand were created by God to be decisive, logical and to dominate.
Feminism errantly teaches women to recognize a man's natural desire to
dominate as being “abusive.” If you have a controlling father or
husband, you ought to thank God that he is being the man God created him
to be. There's no dog any more territorial than a man.

A man
by nature wants to know who, what, where, when, how and why. That's his
God-given right over his own wife, children and property. Why do you
think Karl Marx (real Jewish name, Mordecai Levi) said that he could sum
up Communism with one statement: Abolition of private property!
Do you know why? It's because if you don't own any land, then you have
no rights over that land or what happens on that land. Land ownership
equals rights. Every real man wants to own his own land and be the boss
of his property. The divorce rate has skyrocketed in America because of
women's rights, because God-ordained masculine authority is viewed by
feminists as oppressive. Yet, feminist hypocrites portray women on TV as
being authoritative over men, and women who are able to physically
over-powering men. It's not reality.

Humanity is not perfect. God's way is for men to be in charge of their
homes, marriages, churches and society. However, if you oppress men and
put women in charge by force, using the courts (which is what has
happened in America), then you'll have much more abuse than doing things
God's way. When women usurp authority through the courts over men, all
manner of wickedness flourishes... abortion, nudity, fornication,
homosexuality, despising motherhood, pornography, divorce... because
rebellion is being taught to children by their feminist mothers.

The
2010 census showed 13,000 same-sex couples living in Wisconsin. There
are millions of homosexuals couples nationwide. Same-sex marriage only
became legal in July of 2011 in New York state. This is the same way
abortion eventually became legal at a federal level. You can rest assure
(and go vomit after reading this) that same-sex marriages will be made
the law of the land during the next U.S. presidency (who will be a
homosexual I guarantee it). Mitt Romney is a Mormon sex-pervert. Judaism
and Freemasonry are demonic sex cults, as is Mormonism. President Barack
Obama is a known homosexual, which the newsmedia has covered up
entirely. So also was President Reagan, known in southern California as
“Rainbow Ronnie.” Both Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. are known homosexuals,
members of the homosexual infested Bohemian Grove.

This
is all tied in with women's rights (which is really stripping away
husband's and father's rights). The only hope for the next generation
are godly mothers today, who build-up husbands and fathers in the home.
There is no loyalty to fathers and husbands anymore. The Bible foretold
in 2nd Timothy 3:2 that children would be disobedient to parents in the
Last Days, which is the result of women's rights. If mom won't obey dad,
then the kids won't obey their parents (nor will they obey God). It is
apostasy! Jesus foretold that a man's enemies would be his own family.
Matthew 10:36, “And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.”
This is because of women's rights (which is rebellion).

The
only rights that anyone has are those rights given by God. The
government is not the grantor of our rights, but the defender (if it's a
legitimate government). God is the grantor of our rights. 1st Timothy
5:14-15 teaches that a woman's place is in THE HOME. The women's
rights movement is not about defending women's rights; but rather, doing
away with men's rights, so women can be in charge. 1st Samuel 15:23
equates the sin of feminist rebellion with witchcraft.

Leading the
pro-family movement since 1972 — Get Informed!

"Ye have wearied the LORD
with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one
that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD..." —Malachi 2:17