Movie Review – ‘The Lobster’

0Shares

I keep seeing people describe Yorgos Lanthimos’ The Lobster as a comedy. Though many elements are undeniably comedic, The Lobster belongs first and foremost to the horror genre; a fact all the more impressive considering it never seeks to deliberately scare its audience. Instead it realizes all of the terrors of human intimacy, of the omnipresent societal demands for sexual and romantic homogeneity. In the film’s futuristic dystopia, being single is literally against the law. Single adults are shepherded to The Hotel, a resort where they are forced to find new partners in forty-five days or be transformed into animals of their choice and released into The Woods, the giant forest that seems to make up most of the countryside. Extra time at The Hotel can only be earned by successfully participating in Hunts where Loners—a community of renegade singles living in the Woods seeking escape from the oppressive government—are rounded up and captured.

David (Colin Farrell) arrives at The Hotel after the failure of his last relationship (which lasted “eleven years and one month”). Accompanied only by a dog later revealed to be his brother who had previously failed his last stay at The Hotel, David struggles to navigate the horrors of government-mandated love. When most of his days have run out, he makes one last-ditch effort to remain human by trying to seduce a “Heartless Woman” (Angeliki Papoulia) who delights in cruelty. But after failing to keep up the required facade of sociopathic detachment, he flees into The Woods and joins the Loners. But in a curious twist, instead of advocating free and open lifestyles of one’s own choosing, the Loners are equally obsessive and cruel in maintaining their own preferred sexual norm: absolute celibacy. Any form of intimacy between Loners is met with mutilation. Tragically, he almost immediately falls hopelessly in love with another Loner. Even worse: she falls for him as well.

Lanthimos’ metaphorical condemnations of real-life hypocrisies concerning love and sex hit like guided missiles. My favorite paradox: while sex in The Hotel is encouraged and guests are “serviced” by the staff every day, masturbation is strictly prohibited and brutally punished. The scene where a lisping and pathetic John C. Reilly (who continues his career as Hollywood’s modern-day Elisha Cook, Jr.) has his hand publicly roasted in a toaster for breaking this sacrosanct rule remains one of the most shocking moments of cinematic violence in recent memory.

Much like with Lanthimos’ earlier triumph Dogtooth (2009), the film’s ingenuity springs from meticulous world-building. But while Dogtooth centered on an isolated household, The Lobster focuses on an isolated country. Do not let the surrealistic bent of his films fool you: Lanthimos’ worlds are ruled by strict logic. They are so well-crafted that many of its subtleties might go unnoticed. I wonder how many people picked up on the fact that while an early scene pronounces the reigning government’s official approval of homosexual relationships, there isn’t a single homosexual couple anywhere in the film? Or how the singles only base possible compatibility with each other on mutual disabilities and flaws, not mutual strengths. Or how none of the Loners seem interested in ever leaving The Woods for a different country where they can live however they want. I suppose anything is better than the risk of living alone.

Nathanael Hood is a 27 year old film critic currently based out of Manhattan with a passion for all things cinematic. He graduated from New York University - Tisch with a degree in Film Studies. He is currently a writer for TheYoungFolks.com, TheRetroSet.com, AudiencesEverywhere.net, and MovieMezzanine.com.

Share This

Reilly’s hand in the toaster scene is vaguely funny at first (due to his past credits?) then very sad and weirdly moving. The tone of this movie is great – gut laughs and existential eeriness, comingled. I agree this movie was totally misunderstood and poorly reviewed. It also never made it to theaters here in the US. I wanted to pay to see it in a theater but I had to download a torrent of it for free? What a world.

Nathanael Hood

Tell me about it…

anon

btw, there is one male-male couple in the “Couples Dining Room” scene. Back and to the right.

Nathanael Hood

No joke? Man…I really tried hard to find at least one gay couple…

rocio

I only watched half of the movie, completely hate it, but 2 things:
1) I believe I spotted the gay couple in the dining room as well and
2) I don’t believe the guests were “serviced” in the traditional meaning of that phrase. I believe they were forcibly aroused but denied completion. In a bid, perhaps, to make them more desperate to find a mate. I believe this is the case from the way the main character was pleading with the maid and telling her it was cruel, just cruel for them to do that to him. And, also, probably why the other character could not refrain from masturbating if they kept pushing him to the edge so much.

Aus Dude

Correction. Davids parents where matched on a strength. They were both good at maths. Not all the couples were matched on a weakness. Most of them were.

Aus Dude

Sorry not David. I mean the guy with the limp. His parents. His mother was turned into a wolf.

The horrifying thing about this film for me was the way that it was commonly held belief, like many religious and political beliefs we have, that they are actually turned into an animal. The audience, not part of the distopia, know that they will of course be simply killed and perhaps their body used for organ donation or pet food or whatever…

I thought the acting was very cleaver too with all the characters acting subtly robotic and submissive. The scene in which the three guys have a “fight” is brilliant. They are just the worst at fighting. Just another indication that they have no spirit at all.