Hotel Breakers

Marko

Tuesday, February 4, 2003 3:37 PM

Yes it's that time of year for CP resort questions. If you have stayed at either the Bon Air or Main sections of the Hotel Breakers how was it? Any major drawbacks? And exactly where is the Bon Air section in relation to the rest of the hotel?

CobraRoller

Tuesday, February 4, 2003 4:43 PM

It doesn't really matter what area of the hotel you stay at. Although the newer sections may be more modern, the old sections are just as nice. The only complaint I have about the hotel is that it is too big. I always seem to get the rooms that are farthest away from any entrance, and it can be a long haul (especially when it's late at night, you've just got back from a full day at the park, your feet are killing you, and your dead tired).

Kaldaim

Tuesday, February 4, 2003 4:46 PM

On top of Breakers being a very nice hotel, you also have access to the beach and are right next to the park entrance. I started going to Breakers a few years ago and from now on, I won't go any place else. A little more pricy than hotels on the mainland, obviously, but not really not that bad.

Only problem I had, which isn't the fault of the hotel really, was the bugs. In the begining of the season, the Mufflehead population is insane, and sure enough they got into the hotel. There were only a few in my room, but when you walk down the halls it's kind of eerie (no pun intended) seeing them all over.

Bottom line: If you're going in the begining of the season and have a bug-phobia, you might want to lodge elsewhere. If you don't mind the bugs and are willing to pay a bit extra, Breakers is a great place to stay.

*edit* I guess i misinterpreted your question. I have stayed in both sections and the new section seemed to be nicer. The older room had very uncomfortable matresses, and our toilet wasn't functioning properly. Maybe we got a bad room, i don't know, but I'm under the impression that the older section is more of the black sheep i guess.*** This post was edited by Kaldaim 2/4/2003 9:50:39 PM ***

(SF)Great American

Isn't there only one wing left of old rooms now, anyway? I'm talking about the ones that are older than me, not the ones added in the nineties, but before the huge tower.

I've never been in the newer sections, but I do have a thing or to say about the old wing. It's got (in my opinion) a really nice feel ot it. You can tell by the style of the place that it's older, and I like it. However, it isn't in the best of shape. It's certainly better than many newer motels I've stayed in, but you'll find a bit of peeling paint here or there, a tad of "grubbiness," etc. Also, the mechanical systems aren't in the best of shape: Our air-conditioner worked just fine, but somehow continued to create a mysterious damp spot on the floor (which the maitenance department was unable to fix). However, I still came away with a positive feel from the place. You really won't be spending that much time there, anyway, and I found it had quite a bit of charm to it. From the standards I saw in the older sections, I would expect the new ones ot be top-notch. Anyway you cut it, it's a nice place to stay (though a bit too much for my wallet, when there are so many other options around).

Marko

Wednesday, February 5, 2003 2:50 AM

Thanks for all the opinions! Now I have a map of CP (the souvenir one you buy at the park), looking at that, what part is the Bon Air section? I'm guessing it's the little strip of buildings on the north side of the tower? If so it looks like a 3rd floor room facing north in the Bon Air section would provide a great view of TTD, yes?

wahoo skipper

Wednesday, February 5, 2003 3:17 AM

The Bon Air section of the building is on the far left if you are facing the hotel from the parking lot. It is nearest Soak City.

The Main/Rotunda section of the building (including the rooms above the main entrance hallway) is currently the oldest section of the Breakers. Bon Air was built in the 20's, if I am not mistaken, as an addition.

2Hostyl

Wednesday, February 5, 2003 4:00 AM

Isn't that rathere...unacceptable?!?

I mean, I understand that things will occasionally break down, and being more *antiquated* the older portion is a bit more prone to this than newer places. But when you think about it, Breakers has a TON of time to address these issues. I mean, the place is closed what, six months out of the year? I would *think* that they could take that time to completely overhaul the waste and comfort facilities.

Sandcastle Suites, OTOH, was a pleasure to stay in. If I ever go back to CP and it is more than just me alone, I'll be staying there (unless we try out Lighthouse point once....)

2Hostyl

Wednesday, February 5, 2003 5:38 AM

But is this "random assness" something that is limited to Breakers? I dont think so. Yet I've not seen any other hotel specifically called out for having bad toliets consistently. Methinks something is wrong over at the Breakers (especially if this is limited to the "old" wing)lata, jeremy

--How many licks does it take til you get to the center of the (oh...oh...)