First: The genetic code created by the scientists was really a copy of the code from an existing bacterium. There was nothing new about it. The scientists did add some additional material to the dna (their names and the quote), but it was useless material for the bacteria. It would be like a computer programmer inserting his favorite movie quote, or his birth date into a software code. It is there, but it does nothing.

Second: The copied dna was inserted into another living bacteria. The scientists did not create any of the organellesthe cell membrane, the cytoplasm, etc.of that second bacteria either.

So what exactly did the scientists actually create?

Nothing. They copied, they manipulated, they forced nature in unnatural ways, but they did not create life!

<quoted text>But with all the hoopla surrounding the announcement, dont overlook the facts. The scientists never actually created new life! They didnt even get close.Have Scientists Finally Created Life?http://www.thetrumpet.com/article/7210.5775.0...First: The genetic code created by the scientists was really a copy of the code from an existing bacterium. There was nothing new about it. The scientists did add some additional material to the dna (their names and the quote), but it was useless material for the bacteria. It would be like a computer programmer inserting his favorite movie quote, or his birth date into a software code. It is there, but it does nothing.Second: The copied dna was inserted into another living bacteria. The scientists did not create any of the organellesthe cell membrane, the cytoplasm, etc.of that second bacteria either.So what exactly did the scientists actually create?Nothing. They copied, they manipulated, they forced nature in unnatural ways, but they did not create life!sorry, no cigar....try again...lol

No, they did not create a living organism from non-living material. no-onw has ever seen that happen or knows how it happens.

<quoted text>But with all the hoopla surrounding the announcement, dont overlook the facts. The scientists never actually created new life! They didnt even get close.Have Scientists Finally Created Life?http://www.thetrumpet.com/article/7210.5775.0...First: The genetic code created by the scientists was really a copy of the code from an existing bacterium. There was nothing new about it. The scientists did add some additional material to the dna (their names and the quote), but it was useless material for the bacteria. It would be like a computer programmer inserting his favorite movie quote, or his birth date into a software code. It is there, but it does nothing.Second: The copied dna was inserted into another living bacteria. The scientists did not create any of the organellesthe cell membrane, the cytoplasm, etc.of that second bacteria either.So what exactly did the scientists actually create?Nothing. They copied, they manipulated, they forced nature in unnatural ways, but they did not create life!sorry, no cigar....try again...lol

Wow, you are using dishonesty as if it's a scalpel, not wise. Dishonesty is very easy to see through, so easy it's why people are discarding your mythology, so meh. Just do yourself a favor, learn something instead of lie about what you don't want to learn.

<quoted text>Wow, you are using dishonesty as if it's a scalpel, not wise. Dishonesty is very easy to see through, so easy it's why people are discarding your mythology, so meh. Just do yourself a favor, learn something instead of lie about what you don't want to learn.

Genetics pioneer J. Craig Venter announced Thursday that he and his team have created artificial life for the first time.

Using sequences of genetic code created on a computer, the team assembled a complete DNA of a bacterium, then inserted it in another bacterium and initiated synthesis, or in Venter's words "booted up" the cell.

In a statement, Venter called the results "the proof of principle that genomes can be designed in the computer, chemically made in the laboratory and transplanted into a recipient cell to produce a new self-replicating cell," controlled only by the synthetic genome.

<quoted text>Scientist:'We didn't create life from scratch'GENETIC CODEMay 21, 2010|From CNN reportsGenetics pioneer J. Craig Venter announced Thursday that he and his team have created artificial life for the first time.Using sequences of genetic code created on a computer, the team assembled a complete DNA of a bacterium, then inserted it in another bacterium and initiated synthesis, or in Venter's words "booted up" the cell.In a statement, Venter called the results "the proof of principle that genomes can be designed in the computer, chemically made in the laboratory and transplanted into a recipient cell to produce a new self-replicating cell," controlled only by the synthetic genome.

<quoted text>Scientist:'We didn't create life from scratch'GENETIC CODEMay 21, 2010|From CNN reportsGenetics pioneer J. Craig Venter announced Thursday that he and his team have created artificial life for the first time.Using sequences of genetic code created on a computer, the team assembled a complete DNA of a bacterium, then inserted it in another bacterium and initiated synthesis, or in Venter's words "booted up" the cell.In a statement, Venter called the results "the proof of principle that genomes can be designed in the computer, chemically made in the laboratory and transplanted into a recipient cell to produce a new self-replicating cell," controlled only by the synthetic genome.

Your close.....its "Alien code". Its as complicated as it gets to the human animal....ghost like.

<quoted text>Wow, you are using dishonesty as if it's a scalpel, not wise. Dishonesty is very easy to see through, so easy it's why people are discarding your mythology, so meh. Just do yourself a favor, learn something instead of lie about what you don't want to learn.

manipulating life that already exist, is not "creating life" life in any since of the word as you claimed...case closed.

<quoted text>manipulating life that already exist, is not "creating life" life in any since of the word as you claimed...case closed.

Actually, it is "creating" life in the scientific sense, because what you propose is not creating but simply allowing the chemicals to react on their own, resulting in the formation of organisms. We're working on that in a completely different study.

<quoted text>Actually, it is "creating" life in the scientific sense, because what you propose is not creating but simply allowing the chemicals to react on their own, resulting in the formation of organisms. We're working on that in a completely different study.

As usual the evotarded succubus has infected this thread with her lies. THEY ALTERED EXISTING LIFE ,but you knew that . You simply react like mindless antibodies attacking anything that threatens your puddle gooist belief system with any kind of attack, spewing bile and hatred. Knell wench to your God ,...Nihilism the God of nothing

<quoted text>That's a rather silly thing to say, especially since the Nazi's had "God is with us" embossed on their belt buckles. So since their beliefs ultimately have their roots in Jewish theology also, if we had a Nazi creationist on here spouting fundie BS too I would also be pointing out that they too were invoking invisible Jewish magic. Which would then pish him off as he would presume I was lumping him in with the Jews that he hates so much.And I would laugh at him for both his foolish bigotry and foolish claims.And for the record, I don't recall anything in my history books about the Nazi's making fun of Jews because they believe in invisible Jewmagic.

So uh, it's superwilly and no balls, is that it?

Not really, Hitler just took it a step further and used the term "jewsheisse", of course the nazis took advantage of every chance they had to redicule the jews. They ridiculed jewish belief at every turn. I'll stop about the "jewmagic" terminology, I just don't like it.

<quoted text>As usual the evotarded succubus has infected this thread with her lies. THEY ALTERED EXISTING LIFE ,but you knew that . You simply react like mindless antibodies attacking anything that threatens your puddle gooist belief system with any kind of attack, spewing bile and hatred. Knell wench to your God ,...Nihilism the God of nothing

I knew it was just a matter of time before the "succubus" nonsense would come out.

I should be using some sort of symbol to notate posters who are likely in one type of closet or another. How about *V*. I'll start all my posts to those weasels who are talking to the camera, not the poster, with a quasi "anonymous" (as in the hackers) symbol....although Guy Fawkes you ain't.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.