Wednesday, May 2, 2012

The genesis of the hatred against Gulen and the Hizmet Movement

Every now and then, we are subjected to a purportedly
investigative report by a ‘respected’ (pun intended) journalist about famed
Turkish Scholar, Fethullah Gulen and the movement he inspired: The Hizmet
(service) Movement. On reading the said article or report, we realize it is the
same innuendos, fabrications and the macabre claims of stealth
infiltration in the state bodies of someone’s own motherland and the supposed
takeover of the state. Along the same lines, some facts are given in order to
make the article look credible. Theirs is mixing good and evil with evil being their real intention.For example, Dan Bilefsky and Şebnem Arsu’s recent article in the
International Herald Tribune (“Shadow Force Grows in Turkey,” published on
April 18) about Gulen and the Hizmet
Movement is a classic example of shoddy journalism that’s
judgmental and less factual. It is a comically weak article, full of highly questionable characterizations and buttressed by anonymous quotations that don't actually demonstrate what they're supposed to be.

Everything aside, I
want to comment on this bizarre but repeated claim that Gulen and his
followers are hell-bent on infiltrating the state and taking over it with the
supposed aim of establishing of a (I) conservative and a (II) shari’a based
Islamic state in Turkey. There are two elements here: one
represents Sebnem Arsu and other Dan Bilefsky. The third element
which is always found in articles like these are those written by elements that
hate Erdogan and his government and want to pick a bone with the Hizmet
movement for their support of the Erdogan government. This can either be
internal elements or some people who are driven by geo-political security
issues.

In
this case, Arsu, (probably) a 'white' Turk is driven by disdain. The disdain
for 'black' Turks, the Anatolian hinterland folks who flooded in the last two
decades Istanbul and Anakara’s posh areas with their ‘filthy’ and long clothes,
bearded faces and headscarves. These folks who form the majority of
the Gulen followers decline to drink, fast during Ramadan, wear
headscarves, remain communal, hold Islam in high regard but are very tolerant
of others and many are conservative in mannerism. But in the last two decades,
they have made it big in every sphere you can think of. That’s scary for some
people. For them, these peasants have infiltrated the
state which was the exclusive domain of some hardline secular mandarins.

These
‘infiltrators’ were the people who were banned from walking on certain streets
in Istanbul and Ankara during the early days of the Republic for they could
dirtify it. These are the people the regime labeled “internal enemies of the
Republic” and waged a perpetual, crippling war against them. These are the
people whose daughters were denied university education because they wore
‘un-modern’ clothes. It is worthy to note that Mr. Recep Tayyip Erdogan,
undoubtedly Turkey’s most powerful politician after Ataturk was even forced to
send his daughters to the US after the regime guardians denied his daughters to
join the public universities because they wore headscarves and therefore were
‘infiltrators’.

His
wife once tried to visit a friend admitted at a military
hospital and she was turned away because as a head scarf wearing woman, she was
an infiltrator. That was the way of protecting secularism in Turkey.
President Gul’s daughter lived with the indignity of putting on a wig over her
headscarf every morning in order to get university education. As they defend
the gruesome guardians of a past but suffocating Turkey like Ahmed Sik, neither Dan
nor Arsu decries the bizarre and the inhumane treatment meted on the
overwhelming majority of Turks in the name of secularism.

For
Dan Bilefsky, probably his concern is Islam. As much as he engages in sophistry, you can
taste Islamophobia in his article. The language he uses is the smart one used
by Islamophobes. Don’t show any enmity to Islam, but show purported concern,
legitimate concern of others, particularly fellow Muslims about Islam itself or
those who choose to live by it. He depicts a scary picture, the language used
is potent. The shadowy nature depicted is terrifying. The secretive nature-call it takiyya is real. The West must be wary of Gulen and his
followers. The world must defend the civilized and the secular people in Turkey
who are being brutalized by the “Islamic” forces who want to establish shari'ah
based state. It is interesting how the illiberal elements of yesterday are
depicted as the perpetual sufferers of today as the defend an ideal; the secular ideal, while
nothing is said about Turkey’s bizarre understanding of secularism, brutality
against observant Muslims in their own country, against the Kurds and the
minorities who were subjected to unspeakable crimes.

Gulen
inspired schools that serve millions across the globe are depicted in a
conspiratorial tone and portrayed as a grand scheme of global stealth Jihad and infiltration but
with no evidence. One wonders if this is journalism or hatchet man’s work! If Turkey wants to
turn a page on an ugly history that involved coups, assassinations, executions,
imprisonment, inhuman treatment and the worst of all, a bizarre mentality that
gave some people the exclusive duty to run Turkey as a fiefdom without any
accountability and do to the Turkish citizens as wished, and the Gulen movement
supports turning that page forever, then they are right in supporting the new
development for they have been the primary victims of the coups and military
guardianship. This battle is not about secularism. Gulen and his followers are
fine with it, in fact advocate for it. What they are not fine with is military tutelage and an ideology
that was experimented with in the last century and failed. What they are not
fine with is less democracy, less freedom and less equality. What they are not fine with is to be subjugated to in the name of secularism while it is not.

No
one denies that Gulen followers have had or do have a role in Turkey
just like other citizens or grouping in Turkey. And in this regard, some may have wronged others,
others may have been less open about any mistaken role or engagement, others
may have given unlimited support to Erdogan’s ruling Ak Parti and
others may seem to have over-zealously supported the purge against the
gruesome Maoists in the Military who opposed liberalism, market economy,
personal freedom, engaged in coups and executions and perverted the
constitution and the rule of law. While criticism in light of these issues or
positions may be legitimate or credible, engaging in innuendos and sweeping
condemnation, and using a McCarthyrite witch hunt tells more about
those who do it than Gulen and his followers.

Gulen
has inspired millions of people to do good. The evidence is there. The schools
that were established by his followers have assisted millions of poor people
across the globe to make a leap into the brighter side of life and have been
beacons of hope and multiculturalism. The media that his followers established
helped in opening up Turkey and making it a force to reckon with in the region.
But more importantly, this media has assisted in the democratic process that
Turkey desperately needed and Turkey deserves no less freedom and democracy
than any other nation that enjoys full freedom and democracy. This media has been the greatest supporter of freedom for all including the non-Muslim minorities and the Kurds.

Neither
Gulen nor his followers are angels who are not burdened with human pitfalls,
desires or failures. But every critical article that I have read about Gulen
and his followers has centered on the ludicrous and ironic claim that they are
infiltrating the state. This can only be said by those who still subscribe to
the military’s “internal enemies” policy which designated observant Muslims,
Kurds and minorities as enemies who must be prevented from integrating and kept
at the gates. Today, observant Muslims have less fear. The Kurds can openly
speak their language and name their kids in Kurdish. The minorities continue to
get back their foundations that were appropriated by the secularists and the
juntas. That’s something worth celebrating not decrying; unless we are held
captive by the disdain some were brought up with or the benign Islamophobia
that’s evident in many articles critical of Gulen and his followers.

2 comments:

Nice article, thanks Kenyan Nomad. I hope more people read about Mr. Gulen and Gulen movement. Gulen has been subject of defamation for a long time. You can find many examples of defamation here on this page: http://www.hizmetnews.com/index.php/component/k2/itemlist/tag/defamation%20of%20Gulen