That’s what happens when a country is run on sound fiscal principles not the tax and spend policies of the left.

Had Newt not saved the “First Black President,” from himself and his despicable wife, the Clinton years in office would be remembered as failures, the same as the rest of the progressive administrations have been when history has had the opportunity to put them into perspective.

CPAC activists booed Jeb Bush when Sean Hannity broached the subject of immigration in a Q&A with the former Florida governor, but Bush stood by his perceived conservative heresies on the issue, winning applause as he argued that Americans shouldn’t feel deprived of jobs by incoming immigrants.

“For those who made an ‘oo’ sound — is that what it was? — I’m marking you down as neutral and I want to be your second choice,” Bush said, grinning.

When Hannity circled back to those past stances, he stood by the policies — neither of which passed into law when he was in office — and noted that a conservative state legislature and governor signed an in-state tuition bill into Florida law just this year.

Bush said that “first and foremost” the federal government should secure the borders, but emphasized that “there is no plan to deport 11 million people.” He argued that immigration hawks who suggest that incoming illegal immigrants will deprive poor Americans of job opportunities implicitly subscribe to a liberal view of the economy as a static thing.

“I believe that what we ought to be focused on is growing the economic pie and growing it in a way that looks more like the 80s in America,” he said, referring to America’s four percent economic growth rate in those years. Bush seemed skeptical of using the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill to block Obama’s executive orders, though he didn’t make that explicit and instead emphasized the illegality of Obama’s executive orders on immigration.

“The president did use authority he didn’t have, the courts are going to overrule that,” he said. “I think the Congress ought to pass a bill that does not allow him to use that authority . . . It makes no sense to me that we’re not funding control of our border.”

Thank you, Allen West, for doing America another great service by introducing us to young C.J. Pearson. If C.J. is indicative of America’s future… then things are sure looking up!

In a video this wise young man posted to YouTube, the Georgia native blasts President Obama and praises Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the same time. Young Mr. Pearson gives damning evidence to show that President Obama truly does not love our nation, laying the groundwork for a very convincing argument.

Do yourself a favor watch what CJ has to say and then share this with your friends.

This now an islamic pattern in America — targeting cops. Multiple cop shootings and executions of cops New York by Muslims.

According to the notoriously leftist and islamophiliac Wikipedia, “After three generations, the group has come to have a strong Islamic influence. The Mickey Cobras now have their own unique written constitution and by-laws, which show a strong Islamic influence, just like those of the modern-day BPSN.”

“Breaking: Minneapolis Cop Shooter is a Member of Muslim Street Gang,” By Charles Johnson, GotNews.com, February 21, 2015

GotNews.com has learned that Andrew J. Neal, 43, the suspect in the targeted shooting of MN police officer Jordan Davis, is a longtime member of the Mickey Cobras street gang.

The “Mickey Cobras” AKA the “Almighty Mickey Cobra Nation” is a large, predominantly Black gang that is heavily influenced by Islam and uses Muslim ideology throughout its constitution and by-laws.

MN court records from 2001 described Neal as a Mickey Cobras member and “police informant” who was allegedly involved in the death of Juwan Gatlin, a fellow gang member who was murdered after cooperating with police on a number of unsolved cases.

Neal is no stranger to law enforcement and has an extensive criminal record that includes arrests for attempted murder in 1996 and 2007 and is currently on probation for assault.

If you have any doubt about the credibility and credentials of Mychael Massie please click here.

AS MARY POPPINS ONCE SAID “ THE WIND IS COMING FROM A DIFFERENT DIRECTION” TAKE NOTE OBAMA!

And I am sure you all know that I will not be silent anymore!

The below summary of Barack and Michelle Obama’s 6-1/2 year reign in the White House is by far the best I’ve ever read as it squarely hits the nail on the head.

And it took a black female reporter writing it to make it as effective as it is.

A white man’s account would be instantly criticized by the liberal media as pure racism. But, how can anyone scream Racist when an exacting description of the Obama’s is penned by a well known journalist of color?

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn’t like the Obama’s. Specifically I was asked: “I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama’s? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture.”

The truth is I do not like the Obama’s, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I’ve made no secret of my contempt for the Obama’s. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don’t like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America . They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.

I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President, and a love of our country and her citizens, from the leader entrusted with the governance of same.

President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagan’s made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish.

Forbes Magazine has tended to be a good source of financial advice over the years.

Gold remains a solid, long-term investment and that we should see a long-term buying opportunity in gold sometime this year. Such a purchase could be made either through an ETF, e.g. SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) or physical gold. One can even put gold in their IRA.

Since peaking above $1,900 an ounce in September 2011, gold prices have declined by nearly 40%, settling at around $1,200 an ounce on Friday. I became bearish on gold in January 2013 and discussed why this January 25, 2013 global macroeconomic commentary, citing: 1) the passing dangers of a euro zone breakup (after Spain, Portugal and Greece were bailed out by their richer peers), 2) the recovering U.S. economy, and 3) that gold was highly vulnerable to a major decline after a 12-year bull market. I slapped a 12- to 18-month price target of $1,100-$1,300 an ounce—when gold traded at $1,660 an ounce.

It now appears that the decline in gold prices is nearly over, and that there will be a great long-term buying opportunity in gold this year. Here are three reasons why gold is looking good for the long run.

1. Gold mining production growth to be tepid over the next several years.

2. The outlook for global monetary policy is highly uncertain and incoherent.

3. Indian and Chinese demand for gold will continue to rise

Since gold prices began declining two years ago, the gold mining industry has shifted its focus away from developing new mines to consolidating and reducing costs of existing mines. A recent PricewaterhouseCoopers survey of global gold mining executives shows that 73% of them rank cost cutting, productivity enhancements and consolidation as their top business imperatives in 2015; while only 13% have capital expenditures (i.e. mine expansion) as their top business priority.

This shift away from developing new mines is already impacting production growth. According to the World Gold Council, mine production increased by 4.7% a year from 2008 to 2013. Last year, mine production grew by only 2%.

Our studies also show that the average gold mine has an all-in sustaining cost of around $1,000 an ounce. That is, half of the world’s gold mines would incur losses if gold declines to $1,000 an ounce. For example, Newmont Mining NEM +4.58%, the world’s second largest gold miner (responsible for nearly 5% of the world’s annual gold production), will be forced to cut expenditures or reduce production if gold hits that price level.

Finally, the vast majority of gold production is not hedged. Gold miners are therefore subject to the full force of declining gold prices; should prices decline below $1,200 an ounce, we believe gold mining production growth will stop altogether—thus putting a floor on gold prices.

Fast acting response teams were in place, incredulously no one during her congressional testimony asked a very simple question?

Who ordered the stand down Mrs. Clinton? Mean while Hillary perjured herself while lying under oath to the House Oversight Committee.

This woman actually believes she is a credible candidate for the U.S. Presidency in 2016? We’ve had our fair share of psychopathic liars coming from Obama’s 8 year reign of terror on America, thank you very much!

Tom Fritton, President

Judicial Watch, February 21, 2015

The DC Establishment hopes if you drag out disclosure about a scandal long enough, it loses a bit of its “wow factor” along the way. That would seem to be the view of the Obama administration regarding many of its wanton acts of mismanagement.

Among a long list that ranges from embarrassing stumbles to a flagrant disregard for the rule of law is the disaster that occurred at our Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya. Adding insult to injury (and death) are the lies that were told and the foot-dragging that continues in an effort to minimize the true accountability that this administration and its alumni (such as Hillary Clinton) so justly deserve. Well, this stalling game may work on a media (which is often a co-conspirator in cover-up) and on a hapless Congress. But it doesn’t work on Judicial Watch.

In our two-years’ of court battles (which include at least eight federal lawsuits under the Freedom of Information Act), Judicial Watch has had yet another victory. We released this week hundreds of pages of documents about the military response to the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack.

It is extraordinary that we had to wait for over two years and had to force the release of documents that provide the first glimpse into the military response to the terrorist attack in Benghazi. Where has Congress been? We are happy to do the work of independent oversight of the government on behalf of the American people, but one has to ask why the rest of Washington has broken down in providing citizens accountable government.

Altogether, the Pentagon produced a total of 486 pages to us in response to a federal court order in our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. This particular lawsuit was filed back on September 4, 2014, and you are seeing the results of that effort today. Almost all of the documents had been previously classified as secret. Much of the withheld information, we are told, concerns “military plans and operations,” “intelligence” activities, and other legitimate exemptions.