In this Aug. 29, 2012, photo, Republican vice presidential nominee, Rep. Paul Ryan addresses the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla. It was Mitt Romneys show. But New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie rocked the house. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio was the talk of the town. And Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryans rising-star status was blinding as he accepted the partys vice presidential nomination. The Republican Partys next generation of leaders were in deep supply at the GOPs national convention as they positioned for future national roles and, perhaps, even their own shot at the White House in four or eight years. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Vice Presidential nominee Paul Ryan was the main event at last night's Republican Convention in Tampa, and most observers seem to agree that it was a well-read speech ... that had a few problems with the truth. Unlike Ann Romney and Chris Christie, who generally got decent reviews (or the same reviews, anyway) from both sides of the aisle, reaction to Ryan's speech has mostly focused on the facts — many of which have been heavily disputed. Let the fact-checking/Sarah Palin comparisons begin.

Ryan's speech was notably heavy on the sort of tendentious distortions that his reputation might have led you to believe he disdained. ... The misdirection and red-meat-tossing seemed to be intentional -- a deliberate provocation to the priggish ranks of the pointy-headed fact-checkers, for whom the Romney campaign recently signaled its disdain. (Although it should be noted that Democrats, too, have taken issue with fact-checkers whose verdicts they dislike.) Ryan is being positioned as the Republican ticket's gleeful, unabashed attack dog, someone willing to take it to the other side without regard for the sniffing of the poo-bahs: Sarah Palin in an ill-fitting suit.

Tonight, Paul Ryan brought Rush Limbaugh’s CPAC themes full circle into the next generation with a youthful, smiling face that makes it hard for the Democrats to attack. He related to women, to moms, to small businesses, and to families. ... He appealed to independents and the base. He remains one heck of a pick for Mitt Romney. Paul Ryan is a winner.

So I was in the cheap seats, not on carpet, when Ryan plowed through one of the more impressive strings of whoppers we've seen at this level. Ryan's been doling out chunks of this speech for weeks, which made the fibs sound even stranger.

Dazzling ... Deceiving ... Distracting ... On the other hand, to anyone paying the slightest bit of attention to facts, Ryan’s speech was an apparent attempt to set the world record for the greatest number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech.

If any political speech at the GOP convention can bring together Tea Partiers, independents and the Republican faithful, Rep. Paul Ryan’s was it. Ryan drew a clear connection between fiscal responsibility in government and economic opportunity for the nation. It’s a connection the Tea Party has been making for more than three years, and the Republican Party is finally catching on.

But really, the proper response to a speech like this isn’t to carefully analyze the logic, or to find instances of hypocracy; it’s to call the speaker out for telling flat-out lies to the American people. Paul Ryan has had what I’ve long thought was an undeserved good reputation among many in the press and in Washington. It shouldn’t survive tonight’s speech.

All in all, a very mediocre (at times even painful) night, with only Ryan and Rice standing out. Neither are great speakers, but both struck a real chord with this crowd. To be honest, the response still was not the frenzied tumult a real political star gets, even for those two, but it was pretty good.

"A powerful speech" with only "seven or eight" facts to dispute? Sounds like a winner. Erin Burnett agreed — "There will be issues with some of the facts. But it motivated people." And in the end, isn't "precise, clear, and passionate" more important than truthful?

My first impression: He looks like he’d make a very good congressman. Lucky for the Republicans they’ve got a responsible adult on the ticket in Romney. ... Paul Ryan is no Sarah Palin either, and I mean that in a good way. More like a smart Dan Quayle, with a cowlick.

Conversational, direct, funny, detailed… this was Reaganesque, guys. I was a kid when Reagan was president, so I got lulled into a false sense of what American presidents were – I thought they were all that good. This felt like that.

Paul Ryan’s performance was brilliant. To my mind it seemed Reaganesque, humorously and expertly flaying the Obama administration not merely for failing to deliver on its economic promises but for daring to conceive of Hope and Change as a replacement for America’s founding principles

I have the equivalent of a master’s degree in Ryan lie-ology. I’ve heard many of his lurid fantasies innumerable times and I haven’t got it in me to go through it all again — his deep dishonesty largely reflects the fundamental gap between the radicalism of his agenda and his need for public acceptance. I’ll merely point out that, even if all the smaller component dishonesties of Ryan’s speech were true, the larger points they undergirded were false as well.

The central attack in the speech is one that I agree with: The Obama administration is out of ideas and adrift on economic policies. “They have run out of ideas. Their moment came and went. Fear and division is all they’ve got left.” But the speech did not make the case that Romney and Ryan would succeed where Obama has failed.