That’s not just fast for a woman. Lisicki’s record-setting shot—which broke Venus Williams’ mark of 129 mph—is faster than any serve Roger Federer has hit in 2014, according to statistics provided to me by the Association of Tennis Professionals.

Lisicki, who lost in the third round of the U.S. Open to Maria Sharapova, stuck around long enough to blast the speediest serve of any woman at this year’s U.S. Open (124 mph). That’s just barely slower than the best effort in the Open of top men’s seed Novak Djokovic (125 mph) and equal to or better than the fastest serves of at least 29 men, including seeded players Kei Nishikori, Richard Gasquet, David Ferrer, Guillermo García-López, and Mikhail Youzhny. (I say at least 29 men because not every player in the men’s and women’s singles draw played on a court equipped with a serve-measuring radar gun. Also, a necessary caveat: There has been some dispute about the accuracy of tennis radar gun measurements.)

Advertisement

Serena Williams’ top serve at this year’s Open (122 mph) has also outpaced that of Ferrer (119 mph), García-López (118 mph), and Youzhny (117 mph). And women can compete with the men on average first-serve speed as well. Serena Williams’ average (108 mph) in her quarterfinal match against Flavia Pennetta was better than that of No. 12 men’s seed Gasquet (104 mph) in his third-round loss to Gaël Monfils. And No. 10 seed Nishikori, a U.S. Open semifinalist, has an average first-serve speed of 108 mph—the same as Serena’s highest—in three of his five matches thus far.

In a recent column on hard-throwing Little Leaguer Mo’ne Davis, the Washington Post’s Sally Jenkins argued that cross-gender comparisons risk making the world’s best female athletes look like failures. Indeed, it would be silly to argue that Lisicki and Serena Williams’ fast-serving feats aren’t all that impressive because certain men, like Milos Raonic and John Isner, can serve a whole lot faster. But what’s fascinating about the tennis serve is that the gender gap is so narrow by comparison with other athletic endeavors. And sometimes, as in the cases of Sabine Lisicki and world No. 5 David Ferrer, the gender gap gets flipped completely.

In his excellent book The Sports Gene, David Epstein points out that there’s long been speculation that women might catch up to men in athletic performance—for instance, a 1992 article in Nature asked, “Will Women Soon Outrun Men?” Given that women have only recently been encouraged to participate in sports, it was natural that elite female athletes would improve at a rapid clip. Epstein argues, however, that after the initial boom in women’s sports, “the biological gap is expanding.” In track and field events, he writes, “the top 10 men at any distance … are about 11 percent faster than the top ten women ... [and] in the long jump, women are 19 percent behind men. The smallest gap occurs in distance swimming races. In the 800-meter freestyle, top women are within 6 percent of top men.”

And then there’s tennis. The overlap between men’s and women’s serving speeds in the ball-and-racket sport isn’t totally unique. In golf, the top three women on the LPGA tour in average driving distance—Lexi Thompson, Gerina Piller, and Brittany Lincicome—all outdrive the last man on the PGA Tour’s driving distance scoreboard, Paul Goydos. But there is far more overlap with tennis serves, where someone like Lisicki can crank it faster than many of the world’s best male players.

Golf and tennis have something in common: Players impart force to the ball by swinging a piece of equipment. Do the rackets explain the rocketing serves of top female pros? In a piece on ESPNW.com, the global tour manager for Wilson tells Johnette Howard that he thinks improved racket technology isn’t a huge factor—that improved training and technique “are contributing to higher ball speeds more than a racket change has.”

Or is it the balls? Forbes’ Allen St. John claims that women are serving so well at the U.S. Open because they’re playing with a different ball than the men are, one that flies more quickly. But the data don’t support that conclusion—or at the very least don’t support the idea that the ball explains everything. At Wimbledon, where men and women do play with the same ball, 20 women served 111 mph or faster. At the U.S. Open, 20 women have served 112 mph or faster. The fastest serve by a woman at Wimbledon in 2014 (Madison Keys’ 123 mph strike) was just one mile per hour slower than the fastest serve by a woman at this year’s U.S. Open. (David Ferrer’s fastest serve at Wimbledon in 2014? 118 mph.) And Serena Williams’ fastest average first-serve speed in any Wimbledon match in 2014 (106 mph) was just two miles per hour slower than her fastest average speed so far at the U.S. Open.

If it’s not the ball, then what is it about the tennis serve that makes for such gender parity? Timothy Olds, a professor at the University of South Australia who has studied tennis serves extensively, offers a mechanical explanation. Olds told me that a good serve depends on two things: the height at which the racket meets the ball and the speed of contact. On average, men are taller than women, which provides a natural advantage as they’re driving the ball down toward the service box. Thespeed of contact depends on racket speed, which is a function of what Olds called the “kinetic chain connecting the torso, upper arm, lower arm, and wrist.” This kinetic chain depends on muscle strength and arm length, the latter of which helps the player generate angular velocity. While men tend to have longer and stronger limbs, exceptional servers such as the Williams sisters (Serena is 5 feet 9 inches, while Venus is 6 feet 1 inches) and Lisicki (5 feet 10 inches) are quite muscular and long-limbed. (Ferrer and Nishikori, for what it’s worth, are listed at 5 feet 9 inches and 5 feet 10 inches, respectively.)

This analysis largely holds for golf swings as well. Olds said golf’s kinetic chain is similar, involving whiplash movements dependent on high angular velocities, as is the one employed by baseball pitchers. So why, then—at least after puberty sets in and Little Leaguers move on to high school—is the gender gap so much wider when it comes to throwing a baseball?

In a study of 11 male and 11 female elite baseball pitchers co-authored by surgeon to the stars Dr. James Andrews, the women were found to have a few significant differences in their baseball deliveries. Female pitchers had “shorter and more open strides” and produced “lower peak angular velocity” with smaller forces at the shoulder and elbow joints. In some ways, this tells us what we already know: Women tend to be shorter (shorter stride), have shorter limbs (lower angular velocity), and less muscle mass (smaller shoulder and elbow joint forces). But it also tells us something critical: These elite female pitchers are more representative of typical gender differences than those in tennis and golf. Elite female tennis players are exceptional outliers, whereas, to this point at least, female baseball pitchers are not.

This is part of what made 13-year-old Mo’ne Davis, with her 70 mile per hour fastball, a unique figure. Elite girls are naturally steered toward tennis, soccer, basketball, softball, and other sports that might lead to an NCAA scholarship or professional contract. In baseball, the potential financial payoff for a woman is non-existent. In June, Emma Span wrote an op-ed for the New York Times laying out the various ways in which girls are steered away or outright rejected from playing baseball. One Arizona girl told Span that, despite being good enough for her middle school baseball team, the coach instructed her to play softball, simply because she’s a girl. Sadly, the most anomalous aspect of Davis’ performance is that she was allowed to play at all.

This selection effect creates a surfeit of female talent in a small number of sports. The world’s top women’s tennis players, particularly the Williams sisters, are likely among the best female athletes alive. The best male athletes, by contrast, aren’t concentrated in a particular sport—they might play basketball or soccer or football or run track, depending on their country of origin, socioeconomic status, and any number of other factors.

Still, this doesn’t fully explain why women serve so well yet fall behind in throwing. In a joint study by the University of North Texas and the University of Western Australia, scientists tested aboriginal Australians for throwing ability. The girls had been trained just like the boys but still threw with much less velocity. Clearly, then, differences in throwing aren’t just cultural and aren’t just the result of a selection effect. There’s something biological when it comes to throwing ability that doesn’t have as strong of an effect on serving a tennis ball.

Top Comment

A few years ago there were a lot of men who could serve at ridiculous speeds - Sampras, Ivanisevic, Roddick, Rusedski etc. More...

Like so many inquiries into nature vs. nurture, the explanation for what’s going on in tennis certainly lies somewhere between those two poles. On the one hand, the kinesthetics of a tennis serve are heavily dependent on technique and skill, for which gender has little bearing. Olds mentioned a third component to the serve, spin, which is mostly determined by wrist movement, another factor that’s not all that dependent on gender. In comparison to many other sporting feats, a tennis serve is less reliant on the traditional male strong suit of muscle mass.

Perhaps no player exemplifies this more than Aleksandra Krunic, the 21-year-old Serbian qualifier who served up to 117 miles per hour in her fourth-round U.S. Open match against Victoria Azarenka, this despite her 5-foot-4, 117-pound physique. Although that kind of velocity isn’t close to any world record, it matches many serves on the male circuit. If someone like Krunic can smack the ball at world-class speeds, then serving must be about a whole lot more than just brute strength.