Hows about they do not allow them to publish anything until trial is finished?

Americans like their freedom, including freedom of the press. If your government can tell the press what they can and cannot publish then your press is nothing more than a propaganda mouthpiece for the government.

I've read British press. It is unquestionably British propaganda, often full of outright lies and twisted truths in order to make the average Brit feel like the UK is superior to other nations. One of my favorite repeated stories in the British news is when they list all of the British inventions, and over half of them were done in China more than a thousand years earlier. BTW, are they still telling you that Berners-Lee invented the internet?

I $#@!ing hate this trial. It is by no means a proper criminal trial but in fact, a political one. Certain people want their pound of flesh and the government being in such the state it is in at the moment - with its 10% approval rating - is only too happy to oblige. After all, this does direct attention away from all the scandals currently circulating and it does give the government (and media) breathing room to shift the focus from bigger issues like the Snowden situation.

I suspect that Zimmerman will turn into the perfect rib-eye steak for the public at large, to consume and forget all the other more important issues being put to rest by this tyrannical administration and the puppet master media.

Americans like their freedom, including freedom of the press. If your government can tell the press what they can and cannot publish then your press is nothing more than a propaganda mouthpiece for the government.

I've read British press. It is unquestionably British propaganda, often full of outright lies and twisted truths in order to make the average Brit feel like the UK is superior to other nations. One of my favorite repeated stories in the British news is when they list all of the British inventions, and over half of them were done in China more than a thousand years earlier. BTW, are they still telling you that Berners-Lee invented the internet?

Yes because the jury they selected I'm sure consist of the stupidest people you could find that have no TV's or watch the news cause this was all over the press. When I was part of a legal counsel during Jury selection that was the "dream" pick since people like that are easily persuaded.

Also the SA office has a horrible track record. They botched the $#@! out of the casey anthony case by over charging her also thinking they would be the first office ever to convict with DNA as their big guns.

This guy will walk then everyone in central fl will be mad and get over it in about 2 weeks.

Considering their star witness was a dumbass and evidence points to self defense yes he will. Only thing stupid he did was get out of car and follow him till he got jumped. What Zimmerman did may have been stupid and it is clear he was looking for a fight, but it was not against the law. People will forget about this just as they did before the trial started.

Americans like their freedom, including freedom of the press. If your government can tell the press what they can and cannot publish then your press is nothing more than a propaganda mouthpiece for the government.

I've read British press. It is unquestionably British propaganda, often full of outright lies and twisted truths in order to make the average Brit feel like the UK is superior to other nations. One of my favorite repeated stories in the British news is when they list all of the British inventions, and over half of them were done in China more than a thousand years earlier. BTW, are they still telling you that Berners-Lee invented the internet?

Thats bull$#@!
The reason why the press here do not report such things during a trial is to keep the trial fair and not influence the jury.

HE is credited with inventing the WWW not the internet. The internet existed long before the world wide web, he put the 2 together and created the firs Web page to browse.

I $#@!ing hate this trial. It is by no means a proper criminal trial but in fact, a political one. Certain people want their pound of flesh and the government being in such the state it is in at the moment - with its 10% approval rating - is only too happy to oblige. After all, this does direct attention away from all the scandals currently circulating and it does give the government (and media) breathing room to shift the focus from bigger issues like the Snowden situation.

I suspect that Zimmerman will turn into the perfect rib-eye steak for the public at large, to consume and forget all the other more important issues being put to rest by this tyrannical administration and the puppet master media.

The Trayvon Martin Case is about to come to a close

Originally Posted by Yuuichi

Considering their star witness was a dumbass and evidence points to self defense yes he will. Only thing stupid he did was get out of car and follow him till he got jumped. What Zimmerman did may have been stupid and it is clear he was looking for a fight, but it was not against the law. People will forget about this just as they did before the trial started.

exactly man I mean if I went to law school for 6 years you'd think I would put somebody up on the witness stand as a star witness that would have a little bit of $#@!ing brains and possibly help my case out a bit? I mean $#@!, this is just a classic CELEBRATED case. Look up the criminal justice wedding cake and see that these cases are very very few, and they're NOT how the criminal justice system works on a day to day basis. and I don't think it needs to be said why this case is such a big deal to some people. political influence can blow $#@! out of proportion. I mean yea, the kids dead. but if he was such an angel like they tried to portray him, he woulda been in the library or church or doing home work trying to better the world when he got older. not walking the street.

Dude he was walking to his dads house after going to a convenience store. Was walking some sort of unangelic behavior to you?

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Not at all, and I'm not saying any of it was his fault, or that he was asking for it. That statement was meant as in nobody's an angel so don't try and portray it because something might possibly fit your agenda. what Zimmerman did was wrong because of the fact that he literally followed the kid. that's just asking to start something.

If the kid had a gun, he could've easily called it self defense too. Imagine a fat creepy guy following you with a gun, interrogating you like if you were a criminal. Yeah, we've seen lesser reasons to get shot for. You can make anything up afterwards.

If the kid had a gun, he could've easily called it self defense too. Imagine a fat creepy guy following you with a gun, interrogating you like if you were a criminal. Yeah, we've seen lesser reasons to get shot for. You can make anything up afterwards.

no we'd call that illegal possession of a handgun by a minor not self defense lol jk. I agree. I think tht whole situation was just $#@!ed up MAINLY on zimmermans part. and then how it was handled by the public. even though I do understand the hate for Zimmerman, I'm talking about people just using the case.

no we'd call that illegal possession of a handgun by a minor not self defense lol jk. I agree. I think tht whole situation was just $#@!ed up MAINLY on zimmermans part. and then how it was handled by the public. even though I do understand the hate for Zimmerman, I'm talking about people just using the case.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

hehe but I reckon you would still get away with it by calling it defense and pay a fine or whatever little punishment for having a gun. I know there's a lot of politics around the case and i couldn't care less about all that, all I know is that every single person in this thread would shoot any stalker w/a gun following their child.

hehe but I reckon you would still get away with it by calling it defense and pay a fine or whatever little punishment for having a gun. I know there's a lot of politics around the case and i couldn't care less about all that, all I know is that every single person in this thread would shoot any stalker w/a gun following their child.

yea just a fine and probably communit service. oh hell yea I agree, wouldn't even think twice about it

if that kid had come up to him first and then started all this crap, I would have no sympathy for him. the fact that the kid was trying to run away from him, got stopped by him and interrogated him like he was a criminal (and said stuff to him we don't know of) and I know he could've said some stupid $#@! to him because he said to the cops that "he looks like one of those" or whatever he said, you know he was prejudice.

so once he got knocked out by a kid, he got pissed (note that this $#@!head was on drugs and wasn't taking his pills) and made up a line saying that the kid said he was going to kill him tonight...whatever dude, $#@! you. No kid gets up one day and says he's going to kill someone that night. that is a load of bull$#@!.

he just needed to say that he was a threat and that it was justified. he wanted to start $#@! and couldn't handle it and got pissed off. at this point, if he walks away, i hope he has a $#@! life and ends up killing himself. i have no sympathy for a pathetic coward with the likes of him. none of his $#@! story makes sense at all.

and the fact that he can claim defense "after" chasing someone down...yea, my image of FL is just not the same after this.

if that kid had come up to him first and then started all this crap, I would have no sympathy for him. the fact that the kid was trying to run away from him, got stopped by him and interrogated him like he was a criminal (and said stuff to him we don't know of) and I know he could've said some stupid $#@! to him because he said to the cops that "he looks like one of those" or whatever he said, you know he was prejudice.

so once he got knocked out by a kid, he got pissed (note that this $#@!head was on drugs and wasn't taking his pills) and made up a line saying that the kid said he was going to kill him tonight...whatever dude, $#@! you. No kid gets up one day and says he's going to kill someone that night. that is a load of bull$#@!.

he just needed to say that he was a threat and that it was justified. he wanted to start $#@! and couldn't handle it and got pissed off. at this point, if he walks away, i hope he has a $#@! life and ends up killing himself. i have no sympathy for a pathetic coward with the likes of him. none of his $#@! story makes sense at all.

and the fact that he can claim defense "after" chasing someone down...yea, my image of FL is just not the same after this.

I agree with everything you stated. here's what I'll add: if he walks, he won't walk long. somebody's going to deal some justice. just my guess anyways.

I've been to sanford plenty of times and yes its a "racist" and its been KNOWN for years.

However I've hear all parts of the argument all sides I think the media portrayal of Trayvon is a little screwed regardless its hard for me not to be bias in this case since I'm familiar with the location and the type of people that live there I will say I'm not shocked something like this happened.

My only question is this happened in a residential neighborhood how NO ONE saw exactly what happened or has come forward is a little disturbing to me

Posting Permissions

PlayStation Universe

Copyright 2006-2014 7578768 Canada Inc. All Right Reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written
permission of Abstract Holdings International Ltd. prohibited.Use of this site is governed
by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.