Nobody else is going to save you but yourself-but how?
Read on.
I hold no copyright to any articles, save that:
1)You reproduce in entirety
2)Link to freedomguide.blogspot.com
3)Accredit authorship to J. Croft

The domestic importation of this war on terror weapon merits much more scrutiny than it has thus far received

(updated below)
Excitement over
America’s use of drones in multiple Muslim countries is, predictably,
causing those weapons to be imported onto U.S. soil. Federal law
enforcement agencies and local police forces are buying more and more of
them and putting them to increasingly diverse domestic uses, as well as patrolling the border, and even private corporations are now considering how to use them. One U.S. drone manufacturer advertises its product as ideal for “urban monitoring.” Orlando’s police department originally requested
two drones to use for security at next year’s GOP convention, only to
change their minds for budgetary reasons. One new type of drone already
in use by the U.S. military in Afghanistan — the Gorgon Stare, named
after the “mythical Greek creature whose unblinking eyes turned to stone
those who beheld them” — is “able to scan an area the size of a small town”
and “the most sophisticated robotics use artificial intelligence that
[can] seek out and record certain kinds of suspicious activity”; boasted
one U.S. General: “Gorgon Stare will be looking at a whole city, so
there will be no way for the adversary to know what we’re looking at,
and we can see everything.”

As of the 2010 year-end report from the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), there were already “more than 270 active
authorizations for the use of dozens of kinds of drones” (35% held by
the Pentagon, 5% by Homeland Security and others by the FBI). Employing
them for domestic police actions is following the model quickly being
implemented in surveillance-happy Britain, where
drones are used for “the ­’routine’ monitoring of antisocial motorists,
­protesters, agricultural thieves and fly-tippers, in a significant
expansion of covert state surveillance.”
Even leaving aside the issue of weaponization (police officials now openly talk
about equipping drones with “nonlethal weapons such as Tasers or a
bean-bag gun”), the use of drones for domestic surveillance raises all
sorts of extremely serious privacy concerns and other issues of
potential abuse. Their ability to hover in the air undetected for long
periods of time along with their comparatively cheap cost enables a type
of broad, sustained societal surveillance that is now impractical,
while equipping them with infra-red or heat-seeking detectors and
high-powered cameras can provide extremely invasive imagery. The holes
eaten into the Fourth Amendment’s search and seizure protections by the
Drug War and the War on Terror means there are few Constitutional limits
on how this technology can be used, and there are no real statutory or
regulatory restrictions limiting their use. In sum, the potential for
abuse is vast, the escalation in surveillance they ensure is
substantial, and the effect they have on the culture of personal privacy
— having the state employ hovering, high-tech, stealth video cameras
that invade homes and other private spaces — is simply creepy.
But listeners of NPR would know about virtually none of that. On its All Things Considered program yesterday, NPR broadcast a five-minute report
(audio below) from Brian Naylor that purported to be a news story on
the domestic use of drones but was, in fact, much more akin to a
commercial for the drone industry. Naylor began by describing a video on
the website of a drone
manufacturer, AeroVironment, which names its drone “the Qube”; the
video, gushed Naylor, shows police officers chasing a criminal who
hides, only for the police to pull a drone out of their trunk, launch it
airborne, receive images of where the criminal is hiding on their iPad,
and then find and arrest the suspect, who was armed and dangerous. NPR
listeners then heard from that corporation’s Vice President touting how
much the Qube will help “public safety professionals like law
enforcement, search and rescue, and first responders.”
Naylor then told NPR listeners that drones “have been a success with the military” — though he didn’t mention things like this, this or this
— and then moved on to talk to an official in a Sheriff’s office in
Colorado who uses the Dragonfly X6; in Naylor’s words, that police
official explained how the drone product has “been especially useful in
search operations.” The Sheriff official then hailed the drone’s low
cost, light weight, and fantastic safety record. Next up in NPR’s
report was — seriously — an official with the Association for Unmanned
Vehicle Systems International, which Naylor called “an industry trade
group.” That’s the organization that represents the drone manufacturing
industry, and NPR decided that this, too, was an important source for
its story examining the domestic use of drones. That official touted all
the fantastic private-sector uses for drones, including “Utility
companies – so oil and gas – using a UAS to do surveillance over a
pipeline; electrical companies that want to do surveillance over some of
their electrical wires; the agriculture market. So, you can use UAS for
crop testing. You could use UAS for tracking livestock. ”
With
about 20 seconds left in the report, it came time to tack on a brief,
cursory note about privacy and abuse issues. Said Naylor: “All that
flying around of unmanned aircraft has some people a little wary.” A
“privacy advocate” was put on the air for about ten seconds to note that
“drones can easily be equipped with facial recognition cameras,
infrared cameras, or open WiFi sniffers” and could also be used by
“paparazzi, your homeowners’ association, your neighbor.” Naylor then
noted that the FAA is working now on safety regulations, and with that,
the report ended. So NPR listeners heard for 4 1/2 minutes about the
wonderful, exciting uses of drones from an executive of a drone
corporation, an official with the drone industry, and a sheriff’s
spokesman using drones, and then for about 10 seconds at the end from
someone who is “a little wary.” If the drone industry had purchased
commercial time on NPR, how would this report have been any different?
(An industry commercial might have given more prominent play to the
privacy advocate just to make it seem less one-sided).
There is no question that domestic political unrest is a major concern of law enforcement officials at every level. A new report
released today by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development documents that “the gap between rich and poor in OECD
countries has reached its highest level for over 30 years,” and, as an
OECD official said, “the social contract is starting to unravel in many
countries. . . Without a comprehensive strategy for inclusive growth,
inequality will continue to rise.” As The Washington Postsaid today:
the report “comes as rising dissatisfaction with economic inequality
has spilled over into street protests in dozens of cities around the
world.” Moreover, “the United States, Turkey and Israel have among the
largest ratios between the incomes of those at the top and the bottom,
roughly 14 to 1.”
Drone technology is but the latest War on Terror weapon to be imported onto U.S. soil, and the dangers should be manifest. One article
prominently touted on AeroVironment’s website hails the “Switchblade,”
which the author excitingly describes as “an ingenious, miniature
unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that is also a weapon” and “the leading
edge of what is likely to be the broader, even wholesale, weaponization of unmanned systems.
” The Switchblade drone is “a very short-range, low-altitude,
lightweight, tube-fired UAV that is carried and deployed by individual
warfighters.” It’s ideal for killing a person “behind barriers, around
the corner of a building or in a cave.” Because of how small, light and
easily deployable it is — it is meant to be used by a single individual
on the ground, at the scene of the target — the article dubs this new
product “the ultimate assassin bug.” I found that
article because it was touted on the same website of the same drone
company featured by NPR; that might have been an informative fact to
include in the story.

NOTE: they can install this on any Predator or Reaper drone and any new production drone will have this system.

There's more to the article:

UPDATE: The Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that the head of the drone program for Homeland Security, Tom Faller, is being investigated for possible ethics violations because he joined the Board of the above-referenced drone industry association
while overseeing the drone program for that agency. As is true with
virtually all of this militarization and War on Terror abuse, the motive
is not merely power but also profit, and the almost complete erosion
of the wall between the public and private sector is a key instrument
for how policy justified in the name of security is exploited for
private gain (as one commenter put it here the other day: every time the
U.S. Government gets to explode something, more money is transferred
from the 99% to the 1%).
Meanwhile, below is a 30-second Air Force recruitment TV ad (h/t SuperBowlXX);
how can anyone, after seeing this, not swoon over the greatness of
drones? It’s precisely because of their constant glorification in the
War on Terror that their use is virtually inevitable on U.S. soil: if
they’re such fantastic weapons for stopping Bad Guys over there, why
wouldn’t they be used over here?

Yeah. Gives you a warm feeling huh? Think laying back in your retreat or gulch is going to save you from this as the government magically collapses-think again. FEMA will be the emergency government and the USA as a nation will go into full zombie mode with only essential government systems like the cops and military getting paid and billeted and fed while they hunt all of us down or let us fight amongst ourselves.

Laying back in the woods just makes it easier to blow you away, though they'd have no problem pickling a bomb on your suburban home.

These drones have BEEN in use:

The LA Times quotes a retired U.S. General acknowledging
that Predators are used “in many areas around the country, not only for
federal operators, but also for state and local law enforcement.”
Customs officials who own the drones claim there is legal authorization
for this usage because they indicated in their budget requests to
Congress to purchase the Predators that one purpose was “interior law
enforcement support.” But Jane Harman — the former Blue Dog member of
Congress who was the Chair of the Homeland Security Sub-Committee at the
time the Predator purchases were approved — insists that “no one ever
discussed using Predators to help local police serve warrants or do
other basic work.” But even if you believe Customs officials, think
about what they’re saying: the importation of drones to U.S. soil for
law enforcement purposes was authorized not by a new law or regulatory
scheme, nor pursuant to Congressional hearings or debates, but all
because they inserted the phrase “interior law enforcement support” into
their budget request — such a trivial mention that even the Chair of
the Homeland Security sub-committee says she didn’t even realize this
was being approved.
Whatever else is true, the growing use of
drones for an increasing range of uses on U.S. soil is incredibly
consequential and potentially dangerous, for the reasons I outlined last
week, and yet it is receiving very little Congressional, media or
public attention. It’s just a creeping, under-the-radar change. Even
former Congresswoman Harman — who never met a surveillance program she didn’t like and want to fund (until, that is, it was revealed that
she herself had been subjected to covert eavesdropping as part of
surveillance powers she once endorsed) — has serious concerns about this
development: ”There is no question that this could become something that people will regret,” she told the LA Times. The revelation that a Predator drone has been used on U.S. soil this way warrants additional focus on this issue.

Followers

United Patriot Network

REAL OATH KEEPERS DON'T DO THIS

COPS... WAKE UP

HOW TO SHOOT A RIFLE TRACT

How to Shoot a Rifle
How to Shoot a Rifle
Quick tract on how to shoot a rifle, laid out to be published as a credit card size tract you can print out and plant anywhere and everywhere.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Print onto two, two sided pages if you can't have that option with your printer, you will have to feed and switch sides yourself. Cut horizontally along the dividing lines, top and bottom of the panels and along the outside edge. BE CERTAIN NOT TO LOSE TRACK OF YOUR SECTIONS OR HOW THEY'RE ORIENTED!!!!
You need to cut so that pages one and three are facing up.
When you have your horizontal sections-you should have eight-you then start stacking them, top section, first page over next section down first page, then those two sections placed over the third section down, then the three stacked sections over the bottom section, first page.
Then, your stacked sections go atop the top section, second page, then that stack goes over the next section down of the second page, then the stack goes over the third section down of the second page, and then finally the stack goes atop the bottom section, second page.
AGAIN, DO THIS WITH PAGES ONE AND THREE FACING UP ON A DOUBLE-SIDE PRINT JOB, YOU SHOULD HAVE TWO, REPEAT, TWO DOUBLE SIDED SHEETS OF PAPER.
Staple together.
Pass them out everywhere, the enemy has spent generations vilifiying gun ownership and making rifle marksmanship about a lost art to the average American weaned on hip shooting Hollywood action stars as the actors depicting them cower in fear and so have this BS hapless victim mentality reinforced. Hapless victims are easier to shoot at and herd into camps than Americans who know how to shoot.
This is a beginner's tract, but it has the basics. Pass these around and help save Our America.

About Me

I have been active in the Freedom Movement since 2005-although I've been a supporter since Ruby Ridge. A long time ago was the time to rise up and throw our enemies off our backs but we have to do this now.
Go through all the years as much of my work can be found earlier on. Print them out, keep an open mind and if I'm right, well... why not remove yourself from the system, organize recall elections, learn how to hit a man sized target out to 500 yards?
BE YOUR OWN LEADER
Email at j-croft@graffiti.net

Google Translation

20 Rules-who follows them?

I'm placing these 2o rules someone posted for their group, and I want you to guess which one:

1. They are voracious in their infoseeking. If it takes all night long, or weeks, or years, they will look and look till they get what they have been looking for.

2. Whenever one of their associates or slaves needs something for a mission, Illuminati members make sure this person or persons get the material resources they need to get the job done, whether it be by contributions or whatever. Even if the person is disliked, all that is necessary is that the person has the skills for the job and the plan be workable. No whining on forums, no silly speeches, just gets done.

3. They know how to conserve their resources. They do not throw out all their chips all in on one go.

4. They trust their instincts.

5. If they see an opening, they do not hesitate to take advantage and exploit it.

6. They do not go into deep dark depressions just because they had one minor setback. They use everything they have to find out exactly what went wrong, and correct the problem.

7. They know how to organize themselves.

8. Among them, concepts of color, sexual orientation, and fame are meaningless. The goal goes first.

9. They know what TV is and does - they introduced it, you know! The goal comes before the TV or any of their other mind control devices, such as video games. Watching all those hours every day and being "awake" are like matter and anti-matter. They cannot be in the same place at the same time.

10. They know to not let anyone take what they have. If someone tried to CPS their kids there'd be hell on all involved in trying, even the person who made the call. Literally.

11. You can insult them all you want, call them anything, and they do not take it like Joe and Jane Public would. This is because they have absolutely no pride or morals, but anyone who does with intelligence can easily integrate this into their minds.

12. They would NEVER, under any circumstances, sell out themselves out by giving their family secrets out to the public for peanuts, like so many of the commoners do by selling out their countries and spying on and black opping their fellow humans.

13. In the public eye, wanting a lot of material resources is seen as something to be ashamed of. It is a damn good thing! Everyone should have all the material items they need to do everything they need to do, and should feel pride in having the self-love for holding that perspective and moving with it. This is the mindset the leadership of the Illuminati hold.

14. When information is placed before them that is obviously a threat to their well-being, they immediately take action about it and do not go rushing to drown life circumstances in a TV or bag of takeout, even if they do not know precisely what to do at the moment.

15. Even if all hope seems lost, and the odds are against them, they still keep on working at it 110%.

16. They know the value of building up networks.

17. They feel no guilt about defending themselves from legal, physical, or other attacks. At times I read about people I see acting nice to their agents, saying sorry to them, when it was the agent who had infringed upon their rights. Never be sorry and apologetic to them. It's a clear cut sign of victim mentality and is asking for trouble.

18. They are flexible, to an extent, and do not work with the controlled by them mainstream science and know the reality and value of homeopathy, energy and herbal healing, and do not hesitate to take full advantage of these using all the resources they have at their disposal.

19. They have always understood that they have their livelihood to defend, which is their pyramidal control system and all the luxury that comes with it. Humanity will learn from this, whether it be gently through information like this article, or the hard way. Everyone must understand that their livelihoods are also being threatened, and act upon this via exposure of the agenda.

20. They know to set aside their petty differences when business needs to be taken care of.

Who wrote this?

Nobody in the movement. Someone claiming to have affilliation with the "illuminati" but whether or not doesn't matter, anyone can see the enemy presents a united front against us.

Who lives by this?

Not too many in the movement, in fact most of the time it seems like nobody.