“It was completely devastated, destruction everywhere. It looked like a city of ghosts. Falluja used to be a modern city; now there was nothing. We spent the day going through the rubble that had been the centre of the city; I didn’t see a single building that was functioning.” (Fadhil, ‘City of ghosts,’ The Guardian, January 11, 2005)

On March 3, 2005, Aljazeera reported:

“Dr. Khalid ash-Shaykhli, an official at Iraq’s health ministry, said that the U.S. military used internationally banned weapons during its deadly offensive in the city of Fallujah.” The official reported evidence that US forces had “used… substances, including mustard gas, nerve gas, and other burning chemicals in their attacks in the war-torn city.” (‘US used banned weapons in Fallujah – Health ministry,’ March 3, 2005, https://www.aljazeera.com)

American documentary film-maker Mark Manning told of “American forces deploying – in violation of international treaties – napalm, chemical weapons, phosphorous bombs, and ‘bunker-busting’ shells laced with depleted uranium. Use of any of these against civilians is a violation of international law.” (Nick Welsh, ‘Diving into Fallujah,’ Santa Barbara Independent, March 17, 2005, https://www.independent.com/cover/Cover956.htm)

Despite this and copious other evidence, the BBC’s director of news, Helen Boaden, told Media Lens in March 2005 that her reporter in Fallujah, Paul Wood, had seen “no evidence of the use of such weapons”. Wood added, with considerable naivety:

“The character of the fighting that I saw was bloody, old-fashioned clearing of houses and buildings street by street, block by block, the kind of fighting which is done with little more than an M16 and a handful of grenades.

It doesn’t make sense to use mustard gas, nerve agents, other chemical agents or nuclear devices – to quote the Al Jazeera story – in such a small space also occupied by your own forces.” (Boaden, email to Media Lens, March 7, 2005)

While the recent survey was unable to identify the weapons used by US forces, the extent of genetic damage suffered by residents in Fallujah suggests the use of uranium in some form.

Dr Busby said: “My guess is that they used a new weapon against buildings to break through walls and kill those inside.” (Cockburn, op. cit.)

The authors concluded:

“This study was intended to investigate the accuracy of the various reports which have been emerging from Fallujah regarding perceived increases in birth defects, infant deaths and cancer in the population and to examine samples from the area for the presence of mutagenic substances that may explain any results.

We conclude that the results confirm the reported increases in cancer and infant mortality which are alarmingly high.

Whereas the story of the maltreated cat received heavy coverage for almost one week across the UK media, we (and activist friends in the United States) can find exactly one mention of the Fallujah cancer and infant mortality study in the entire UK and US national press – Patrick Cockburn’s article in the Independent.

The story has simply been ignored by every other US-UK national newspaper.

The study +has+ been reported elsewhere.

Cockburn’s piece was reprinted in The Hamilton Spectator in Ontario, Canada on July 24 and in the July 25 Sunday Tribune in Ireland.

The July 27 Frontier Post in Pakistan ran an excellent piece on the US military’s use of depleted uranium in several theatres of war, including Fallujah. So did the July 30 Irish News.

The destruction of Fallujah is only one small item on an almost unbelievable list of horrors heaped by the United States and Britain on Iraq – crimes that are rarely considered individually and almost never as a whole.

Readers might like to consider how often they can recall the mainstream media summing up the recent history of Iraq in the way that US dissident writer Bill Blum did last week:

“… no American should be allowed to forget that the nation of Iraq,

the society of Iraq,

have been destroyed,

ruined,

a failed state.

The Americans, beginning 1991, bombed for 12 years,

with one excuse or another,

then invaded,

then occupied,

overthrew the government,

killed wantonly,

tortured …

the people of that unhappy land have lost everything — their homes,

their schools,

their electricity,

their clean water,

their environment,

their neighborhoods,

their mosques,

their archaeology,

their jobs,

their careers,

their professionals,

their state-run enterprises,

their physical health,

their mental health,

their health care,

their welfare state,

their women’s rights,

their religious tolerance,

their safety,

their security,

their children,

their parents,

their past,

their present,

their future,

their lives …

“More than half the population either dead, wounded, traumatized, in prison, internally displaced, or in foreign exile …

The air, soil, water, blood and genes drenched with depleted uranium … the most awful birth defects … unexploded cluster bombs lie in wait for children to pick them up … an army of young Islamic men went to Iraq to fight the American invaders;

they left the country more militant, hardened by war, to spread across the Middle East, Europe and Central Asia … a river of blood runs alongside the Euphrates and Tigris … through a country that may never be put back together again.”

“After everything that’s happened in Fallujah, the Americans aren’t going to find an +unambiguous+ welcome. But Fallujah +is+ more peaceful than it’s been in a long time. Its people like that.” (Wood, BBC 1, 18:00 News, June 22, 2005)

SUGGESTED ACTION

The goal of Media Lens is to promote rationality, compassion and respect for others.

If you do write to journalists, we strongly urge you to maintain a polite, non-aggressive and non-abusive tone.

Ask the following newspapers why they have not covered this credible evidence of a US-caused humanitarian catastrophe in Fallujah: