No funds, no spies: US Secret Service may kick off hiring freeze over funding dispute

The US Secret Service will have to hold off on hiring new agents for the upcoming presidential election, unless Congress resolves a politicized funding dispute. Any new security initiatives will also have to be placed on the back burner.

Money woes at the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) prompted DHS Secretary Jeh
Johnson to announce Wednesday that until the budget issues are
resolved, the agency will have to put any new measures on
hold.

The agency’s funding is to run out next month. The agency will
remain in a limbo state until new funds are approved.

"The clock to February 27 is ticking," Johnson said during a
speech in Washington. "In these times, the Homeland Security
budget of this government should not be a political football."

The federal agency, which is responsible for securing US borders
and protecting the president, will have to delay implementing
December recommendations by a panel on the Secret Service. The
review found that the agency was stretched “beyond its limits”
and would need to boost hiring and training in order to ensure
the November 2016 election runs safely.

"We cannot invest in the things the independent panel recommended
to improve the Secret Service; we cannot hire new Secret Service
agents for the coming presidential election cycle," Johnson said.

Congress is entangled in a debate over how to fund the agency.
Republicans in the House of Representatives have said they would
only approve a funding bill if it includes an amendment to block
President Obama’s executive order to provide protection to
millions of undocumented immigrants.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has said it will veto any
bill that scales back the president’s immigration initiative,
which would allow some five million undocumented immigrants to
temporarily stay in the country if they came to the US as
children, or are parents of US citizens or legal residents.

Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski called on Senate Republicans
for a “clean” bill, stripped of the House’s anti-immigration
amendments.

"Do not play politics with the security of the United States of
America," she said.

Three former DHS secretaries have also urged lawmakers to remove
politics from the funding dispute. “We do not question your
desire to have a larger debate about the nation's immigration
laws,” they wrote in a letter to Congress. “However, we cannot
emphasize enough that the DHS's responsibilities are much broader
than its responsibility to oversee the federal immigration
agencies and to protect our borders. And funding for the entire
agency should not be put in jeopardy by the debate about
immigration."