Thursday, 27 February 2014

USA will be presenting a Resolution against Sri Lanka at this Session. As a patriot of my country please permit me to address you , to request
you please give me a little of your time to inform you what this resolution is all about, what USA
presenting the resolution is trying to hide, and why you should vote against it.

Japan which suffered most from American aggressivity
in the two atomic bomb attacks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
lost 225,000 deaths of innocent civilians. Therefore, as a country that honour their
death ,Japan cannot in memory of those
who died stand neutral abstaining from voting against the USA resolution
against Sri Lanka. America was the
perpetrator of those deaths and spiritually Japan cannot abstain, but vote
against American resolution in memory of those who died in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki.

Dear Sirs,
please think of one country USA
and the West have helped to come out of their poverty and develop to give its people
a decent standard of living. There is none. You are from countries that support America
blindly, being people of white Nations. Nevertheless
it is worth considering whether this
aggressive diplomacy of America
is worth pursuing.

There is
more that could be done by following a more peaceful policy, without this
pursuit of leadership challenging the Russian and Chinese influence in the
world. USA
and the West could derive more benefits to themselves and contribute to the
welfare of developing Nations by
cooperating with Russia and China, without seeking a leadership refusing to
accept the tremendous economic and social advance of China
and Russia,
which follows a non-aggressive, democratic foreign policy. They do not employ, CIA, NGOs or NEOCOMs to destabilise
countries and change regime.

This
resolution against Sri Lanka
is being presented at the 11th Anniversary of the Invasion of Iraq
by USA
on the 19 March,2003. It marks the beginning of a different type of war for
balkanisation of developing Nations, and regime change in developing countries,
and barring the Chinese and Russian influence
in the world.

China -Russia is a combined emerging world
leadership. It is popular for its
generosity and ability to evaluate problems of nations with a democratic
attitude, without demonising a government in power, getting dissidents and
rebels to agree on a dialogue laying down arms. Both China
and Russia are a more
acceptable leadership for the developing countries, against ungenerous
aggressivity of USA
and its allies..

USA and the Western forces rallying
together like wild wolves, frighten emerging nations, and force them to take
distance from them . Their power is in
the likes of NATO Forces and the weight
of their bombs and the number of them which could be dropped in one raid on a developing nation in
each take off of their bomber planes.

They call
this “humanitarian bombing”.

In 1999, the U.S. national security state — which has
been involved throughout the world in subversion, sabotage, terrorism, torture,
drug trafficking, and death squads — launched round-the-clock aerial attacks
against Yugoslavia for 78 days, dropping 20,000 tons of bombs and killing
thousands of women, children, and men. All this was done out of humanitarian
concern for Albanians in Kosovo. Or so we were asked to believe. In the span of
a few months, President Clinton bombed four countries: Sudan, Afghanistan,
Iraq repeatedly, and Yugoslavia
massively. At the same time, the U.S.
was involved in proxy wars in Angola,
Mexico (Chiapas),
Colombia, East
Timor, and various other places. And U.S. forces are deployed on every
continent and ocean, with some 300 major overseas support bases — all in the
name of peace, democracy, national security, and humanitarianism. (1) (http://americanpartyoflabor.org/publications/press-room/statement-on-the-bombing-of-libya)

USA and
its allies bombed Libya
saying it was to save the Libyan people from their Leader Colonel Gaddafi.

"All NATO's targets are military in nature and
are directly linked to the Gadhafi regime's systematic attacks on the Libyan
people," said Rear Adm. Russell Harding, deputy commander of Operation
Unified Protector. "Given the escalating use of naval assets, NATO had no
choice but to take decisive action to protect the civilian population of Libya and NATO
forces at sea."

The USA
and the West are a force with waning power,
now climbing on the shoulders of
dissidents of developing countries. In Sri Lanka
they have climbed on to the shoulders of the anti Sri Lanka Tamil Diaspora, National Tamil
Alliance in Sri Lanka with a wife of a
former terrorist Ananthi Sasitharan, to
make their rallying call to defeat the aim of Sri Lanka to become a Nation of a
united people.

USA as
it did in the past with its CIA, infiltrates into countries to create chaos
within and force a peoples’ uprising to make the Government and the Leaders to
step down. They did it in Iran against Mosadeq, in Chile against Salvadore Allende , in Congo
against Lumumba. They did that in Yugoslavia,
Egypt, then in Tunisia. They
are doing the same thing in Syria,
Ukraine,
and Venezuela.

USA and
its Allies are now trying to do that in Sri Lanka
as well, using Human Rights and War Crimes as their new arms. They are trying to fool some of the delegates , attending the UNHRCouncil Sessions
in Geneva,
presenting them a resolution against Sri Lanka asking them to vote in favour of it.

The delegates from South Africa should note that Even Mandela knew what
USA is capable of, “When
Mandela was taken to the ruins of Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, which was
bombed by the Reagan administration in 1986 in an attempt to murder the entire Gaddafi
family, he(Mandela) said:

“No country can claim to be the
policeman of the world and no state can dictate to another what it should do.
Those that yesterday were friends of our enemies have the gall today to tell me
not to visit my brother Gaddafi. They are advising us to be ungrateful and
forget our friends of the past.” (http://thepowerhous.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/mandela-and-gaddafi-the-myth-of-the-saint-and-the-mad-dog/)

USA and
its allies propose an International investigation in Sri Lanka to study what happened
when the terrorists were finally eliminated.
In reality USA and its allies
have no right to propose this in respect of Sri Lanka, without
subjecting themselves to an International Investigation into their own war
crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Yugoslavia, and also those
civilian deaths in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Vietnam.

Sri
Lanka had appointed
its own Commission LLRC to study how terrorism had affected the people
and the country, and whether there had
been violation of human right in the course of the elimination of the terrorists. It
examined the divers problems that had
resulted in the course of the elimination of terrorism and made recommendations
to redress the wrongs and proposed actions to be taken to reconcile the
Communities.

But USA and its
allies do not accept the Commissioners
of the LLRC, even though they were learned, highly qualified people.
Some of them having even Studied
in Foreign Universities. The reason why USA and the West do not accept the
LLRC is because the Commissioners even if they were qualified were black
locals. Had there been at least one
European or an American even less qualified than the local blacks, USA
and the West may have accepted the report and not requested an International
Investigation as they are now insisting in the USA Resolution against Sri Lanka.

But the colour
does not matter for the USA and the
West to accept all false stories concocted by Ananthi Sasitharan the wife of a
terrorist as the truth, because it suits them.

USA and
the West have been able to destabilise many developing countries by instigating the people to rise against the
governments in place such as Egypt,
Tunisia, Ukraine, Yugoslavia,
and Venezuela.
There are a new set of neocon activists, the CIA and NGOs infiltrating into the countries using their
Embassies in these countries as their centres of activity. They buy the people
on to their side tempting them with promises they never keep to rise up
in groups and masses against the elected Government.

They are planning such an uprising in Sri Lanka to make a situation where they could
intervene with their own armed forces and bombs shattering into rubble the five
years of infrastructure developed of Sri Lanka that is being carried out
by the President Mahinda Rajapakse and his Government.

As it has not
been easy in Sri Lanka for USA and its
allies to divert the allegiance of the
people to the President and his government,
as they made it happen in Egypt,
Tunisia, Yugoslavia, Ukraine or Venezuela, and create an artificial uprising of
the people, USA and the West befriended the Tamil people in the North of Sri
Lanka.

In order to strengthen this relationship with the
Tamils of the North, USA has
presented the Resolution against Sri Lanka
at this session of the UNHRC in Geneva. The passing of the USA Resolution against Sri Lanka would
be their trump card to win the Tamil people of the North on to their side.

That would then be the spring board from which the USA
and its allies with the help of the anti
Sri Lanka Tamil Diaspora and the Local pro terrorist politicians of the Tamil
National Alliance who have formed the Provincial Council in the North, will move to separate the North of Sri Lanka from
the rest of the country.

Honourable Delegates, this is the possible scenario USA and its
allies are preparing in presenting this Resolution. They will ask you to
support their Resolution against Sri Lanka,
but please remember that this may happen in your own country, and it will then be your turn to face similar resolutions
in the UNHRC in Geneva.

USA and
the West want to retain their leadership in the world and to do that they will
sacrifice every developing Nation they have been able to fool to follow them.

Honourable Delegates you should stop this from happening and therefore
support Sri Lanka which is
one amoung you, and vote against the USA
Resolution against Sri Lanka.

Sri
Lanka has done
nothing wrong to be put in the box of an accused and to be treated like a war
criminal. Sri Lanka only eliminated a group
of terrorists that terrorised its people massacring and assassinating them,and
caused great destruction to land and property.
The war against terrorists in Sri Lanka was a just war. In a war against ruthless terrorism one cannot be accused for violation of human rights and
war crimes.

It is different from the wars that USA and its allies carried out in Iraq , Afghanistan,
Yugoslavia, and Libya. In those wars the America was fighting in foreign
countries against foreigners and there was no necessity for them to be careful
about who got killed in their bomb attacks.

But in Sri
Lanka the terrorists were its own people and
Sri Lanka Armed Forces fought that
war within its own territory. And
knowing that they are fighting in their own country against a group of
terrorist sprung from amoung them, were careful when fighting against the
terrorists not to put in danger the lives of the Tamil civilians and their
property.

This USA and its allies would not accept as it does
not help them in their object of
territorial separation of Sri Lanka

All the accusations USA
are making against Sri Lanka
in presenting their resolution are false. The violation of human rights and war crimes
they accuse the SL Government and its Armed Forces to have committed at the
last phase of the elimination of terrorism are false as they are based primarily on hear say
evidence and fictitious films of horror made by UK Channel 4 using modern
technology.

USA
accuses the presence of the Sri Lanka Armed Forces in the North. It is Normal
that Sri Lanka maintains its
armies in the North which is a part of Sri Lanka. It is essential for security purposes and to
ensure that there would be no
possibility for another group of terrorists to re-immerge.

Diego Garcia

Diego Garcia American Military Base in Indian Oceran

USA which accuses Sri Lanka for the presences of its
armed forces in its own country, is hiding the fact that USA maintains 737
Military Bases in 63 countries outside USA deploying 255 065 USA Military personnel.

“These facilities
include a total of 845,441 different buildings and equipments. The underlying
land surface is of the order of 30 million acres. According to Gelman, who
examined 2005 official Pentagon data, the US is thought to own a total of 737
bases in foreign lands. Adding to the bases inside U.S. territory, the
total land area occupied by US military bases domestically within the US and
internationally is of the order of 2,202,735 hectares,
which makes the Pentagon one of the largest landowners worldwide (Gelman, J.,
2007).

Tuesday, 25 February 2014

The Sri
Lanka Government seems to be running like a dog having got its paws burnt as the old saying goes
sending in a hurry delegations to South Africa in search of a
report of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

The USA government’s over zealous ballyhoo against Sri
Lanka for violation of human rights, and war crimes, is a
gimmick to frighten governments of developing countries to show them what USA and its allies are still capable of doing
despite their losing their economic leadership panache to China –Russia. There is no need to panic USA and its allies will be there again at the
next UNHRCouncil presenting another resolution against Sri Lanka, as they can think of
nothing better to do.

USA and its allies are only capable of
leaving behind them desolation and
destruction.

Perhaps
this resolution against Sri Lanka
is of double interest to USA- it marks the 11th Anniversary
of the Invasion of Iraq by USA on the 19 March,2003. It also marks
the beginning of a war without bombs- a war nevertheless to
destabilise Sovereign States of the
third world.

China -Russia is a combined emerging world
leadership which is popular for its generosity and their ability
to evaluate problems of nations with a democratic attitude, without demonising a government in power, getting dissidents to agree on
a dialogue laying down arms. Both
China and Russia are a
more acceptable leadership for the developing countries as they are neither
aggressive, nor do they come with destructive motives.

USA and the Western forces rallying
together like wild wolves, frighten emerging nations, and force them to take
distance from them . Their power is in
the likes of NATO Forces and the weight
of their bombs and the number of them which could be dropped in one raid on a developing nation in
each take off of their bomber planes.

They call
this “humanitarian bombing”.

In 1999, the U.S. national security state — which has
been involved throughout the world in subversion, sabotage, terrorism, torture,
drug trafficking, and death squads — launched round-the-clock aerial attacks
against Yugoslavia for 78 days, dropping 20,000 tons of bombs and killing
thousands of women, children, and men. All this was done out of humanitarian concern
for Albanians in Kosovo. Or so we were asked to believe. In the span of a few
months, President Clinton bombed four countries: Sudan,
Afghanistan, Iraq repeatedly, and Yugoslavia massively. At the same
time, the U.S. was involved
in proxy wars in Angola, Mexico (Chiapas),
Colombia, East
Timor, and various other places. And U.S. forces are deployed on every
continent and ocean, with some 300 major overseas support bases — all in the
name of peace, democracy, national security, and humanitarianism. (1) (http://americanpartyoflabor.org/publications/press-room/statement-on-the-bombing-of-libya)

USA and
its allies bombed Libya
saying it was to save the Libyan people from their Leader Colonel Gaddafi.

"All NATO's targets are military in nature and
are directly linked to the Gadhafi regime's systematic attacks on the Libyan
people," said Rear Adm. Russell Harding, deputy commander of Operation
Unified Protector. "Given the escalating use of naval assets, NATO had no
choice but to take decisive action to protect the civilian population of Libya and NATO
forces at sea."

Their peace is like a doubled aged sword. Hence the people of a country whether they
are for or against their elected government should be warned to unite to fight against USA and their forces the greatest
enemy of emerging Nations amoung the developing countries.

The USA
and the West are a force with waning power,
now climbing on the shoulders of
dissidents of developing countries. In Sri Lanka
they have climbed on to the shoulders of the anti Sri Lanka Tamil Diaspora, National Tamil
Alliance in Sri Lanka with a wife of a
former terrorist Ananthi Sasitharan, to
make their rallying call to defeat the aim of Sri Lanka to become a Nation of a
united people. USA and its allies rally to
change regimes and balkanise
developing Nations.

They accept any false evidence, as valid such as the
Video footages and Documents by UK Channel 4 which no decent Nation would
accept, if it serves their purpose to bring accusations against the Government of Sri Lanka and its Armed Forces that defeated a ruthless terrorism to bring
peace to the country and to the people who suffered for 30 years under
terrorism.

USA as
it did in the past with its CIA, infiltrate into countries to create chaos
within and force a peoples’ uprising to make the Government and the Leaders to
step down. They did it in Iran against Mosadeq, in Chile against Salvadore Allende , in Congo
against Lumumba. They did that in Yugoslavia,
Egypt, then in Tunisia. They
are doing the same thing in Syria,
Ukraine,
and Venezuela.

USA and
its Allies are now trying to do that in Sri Lanka as
well, using Human Rights and War Crimes as their new arms. They are trying to fool some of the delegates , attending the UNHRCouncil Sessions
in Geneva,
presenting them the resolution against Sri Lanka asking them to vote in favour of it.

They are doing that accusing Sri Lanka, to show
themselves as the saviours of humanity not
showing the blood marks left on them from the innocents they have killed, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, and
Yugoslavia, not to speak of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Vietnam, and Cambodia.

So why should Sri Lanka
be on a panic mood, now running to South Africa to study
Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report of that country. It has no relevance what-so-ever to Sri Lanka. It
is really a short sighted move which
shows Sri Lanka’s
weakness, rather than its strength. What
has South Africa
achieved with that Reconciliation Commission ?

In South Africa
today the economy is still in the hands of the rich white South Africans. The black South Africans are still poor, with
a highly increasing criminality amoung them.

In South Africa
it was a White minority who set up a white man’s regime pushing the natives
black Africans into ghettoes. “ From
1948 onwards public life was marked by a strict
segregation that was enforced by massive policy powers. The segregation aimed
at ensuring the rights and privileges of the white population and at providing
cheap black labour.

The introduction of so-called homelands (officially
independent tribal areas of the blacks) like Transkei,
Ciskei, Venda and
KwaZulu was supposed to bring racial segregation to perfection. By establishing
these huge ghettos, where only black people were allowed to live, the South
African government tried to completely abdicate from its political, economic
and social responsibility. ”

There was nothing like this in Sri Lanka the Sri Lanka’s
majority community did not treat the Tamil community differently. Even today
the Sinhala community has opened them selves to the Tamil people. But it is the Tamil Politicians of the TNA
and the anti Sri Lanka Tamil diaspora that is separating the Tamil people from
the rest of the Communities in Sri
Lanka .
There is therefore no apartheid in Sri Lanka and there never was. Why should we then look for a Truth and
Reconciliation Commission of South Africa ?

Even Mandela knew what USA
is capable of, “When
Mandela was taken to the ruins of Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, which was bombed by the Reagan
administration in 1986 in
an attempt to murder the entire Gaddafi family, he said:

“No country can claim to be the
policeman of the world and no state can dictate to another what it should do.
Those that yesterday were friends of our enemies have the gall today to tell me
not to visit my brother Gaddafi. They are advising us to be ungrateful and
forget our friends of the past.” (http://thepowerhous.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/mandela-and-gaddafi-the-myth-of-the-saint-and-the-mad-dog/)

USA and
its allies proposes an International investigation in Sri Lanka to study what happened
when the terrorists were finally eliminated.
But in reality some among the 47 delegates representing the
47 countries at the UNHR Council Sessions should move that before presenting
the resolution against Sri Lanka USA and its allies should first consent to an
international investigation about their own violation of human rights and war crimes in Iraq , Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Libya, Yugoslavia, and also those civilian deaths in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and
Vietnam.

The problem with the LLRC for USA and its allies is that the
Commissioners were all local black Sri
Lankans. They were learned highly qualified
people. Most of them were eminent
judges; some were Diplomats. Some of them
Studied in Foreign Universities as well.

But only disqualification for USA and its
allies is that they were coloured locals, therefore they are not accepted as
honest. If there was a white man amoung
the Commissioners even if he was half educated the Commission would have been
acceptable to the USA
and the West. Therefore, the demand for an International Investigation
in the USA resolution
against Sri Lanka.

What is strange in this is that the USA and the
West accepts all false stories concocted by Ananthi Sasitharan the wife of a
terrorist as the truth, because it suits them.

Sri Lanka Government instead of being in a panic mood
behaving like a dog whose paws have got burnt, should start a campaign of
information every where in Sri Lanka to
make the people aware of the scheming of the USA and the West, in countries
like Egypt, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yugoslavia, and Venezuela, where their Agents the
CIA and NGOs infiltrated into the towns
and villages and bought the people tempting
them with promises they never keep to rise up in groups and masses
against the elected Government.

Inform the people that USA
and the West , once their objective achieved set up a puppet Government which does things according to their bidding
and leave the country, poor ,
underdeveloped depending on hand outs from USA and the West.

They are planning such an uprising to make a situation
where they could intervene with ntheir own armed forces and bomb Sri Lanka
shattering into rubble the five years of infrastructure developed by the
President Mahinda Rajapakse and his Government.

Let the people of Sri Lanka be informed in mass
meetings that the time is ripe for all
people to bury their political differences and rally round the President and
the Government to show America and its Western allies that they cannot do in
Sri Lanka what they did in Egypt, Tunisia, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, or Venezuela.

Thursday, 20 February 2014

Why the
Delegates to the 23rd Session
of UNHRCouncil should not vote for the USA
Resolution against Sri Lanka
?

__________________________________________________________

Because to
do that would be counter
productive. It is also a travesty of
justice. Why should USA move a resolution against Sri Lanka ? In which way would it provide justice to the
Tamil people , and Sri Lanka
as a whole ?

In finding
a solution to the problem of the Tamil people, they cannot be separated from
the rest of the people of Sri
Lanka. But USA is only pandering to the Tamil Community separating them from the rest of the
communities. Separating people in a
country for what ever cultural, social and religious differences is not promoting human rights, it is an injustice in the highest sense.

But this is
what USA had been doing in countries like Yugoslavia
without taking into consideration America’s own historical racial
integration.

Honourable Delegates, consider for an instance the
Situation where the Black-Americans
which is about 12 percent of the American Population demand a separate American
States in the south like Alabama, Georgia,
Carolina and Florida exclusively for themselves. What would have been the reaction of the Government
of USA ?

The USA would have
taken drastic action against them, with
the Ku Klux Klan burning the Black Americans alive.

But instead
of that segregation, America integrated the Black Americans into the
white population building one great nation of America. Despite that American
experience why does America now
seeks to divide communities in countries out side America. America should instead be a
unifying force. It should instead of
passing resolutions against Sri Lanka
advice the Tamil population to integrate with the other Communities in Sri Lanka as it happened in America. But America is
doing what is politically beneficial to it.

What is behind
this USA move to present a resolution against Sri Lanka at UNHRC ?

The real reason is that the expatriate Sri Lanka Tamils living in USA,
Canada and in other European
Countries contributed to finance
the terrorism in Sri Lanka. They
collected ( and continue to collect) funds from the Tamils in the diaspora, to purchase arms and ammunition, military
equipment and sophisticated communication material etc.They thus assisted the Tamil
terrorists in Sri Lanka to break away the North and East of Sri Lanka by force
to setup a separate State for the Tamil people.

A repenting
terrorist arms procurer Sathajhan
Sarachandran serving a 25 year prison term in US says, “ The rejection of armed militancy is a
complete reversal for the Toronto men, who were
part of the international weapons procurement network that supplied the Tamil
Tigers, or LTTE, during Sri
Lanka’s long civil war. (National Post)

When the
terrorists were eliminated the pro-terrorist Tamils of the diaspora who had
collected large sums of money to help terrorism were left with these funds, and
decided to continue terrorism through other means for the creation of a SeparateTamilState
in Sri Lanka.

They formed
into Tamil Front Organisations to carry
out a well organised campaign against Sri Lanka, discrediting the
Government and accusing the Sri Lanka Armed Forces for violation of human rights and war crimes. They worked along with their
Agents in Sri Lanka the Tamil
Nationa Aliance, which is a proxy party of the Sri
Lanka terrorists , to prepare the ground to accuse Sri Lanka
for violation of human rights and war crimes during the last phase of the
military operations against the terrorists, and eventually set up a separate
State for Tamil people.

Some of
these Tamil Front Organisations in
America formed a group called Tamils for Obama, and assisted actively in the President Barak Obama’s Presidential Campaign making financial
contributions becoming known political
activists amoung the Democratic Party Establishment.
They were thus able to contact the officials of the American State Department, and approach
the American Political hierarchy to accuse Sri Lanka for violation of human
rights and war crimes against the Tamil
people in the course of the elimination of terrorism.

They were able
through various means to get the USA and its allies to accuse Sri Lanka for
violation of human rights and war crimes at the last phase- which was about two
weeks before the elimination of the
terrorists. But the actual terrorism in Sri Lanka lasted
for thirty years, and the process of elimination of the terrorists by the
intervention of the Sri Lanka Armed Forces commenced only in 2005.

Why then
the investigation for violation of human rights and war crimes only for the
last two weeks before the elimination of terrorism ?

This is the
question the Delegates should ask themselves.

The reason
Sirs, is that the terrorists from 1983 to 2005 carried out a systematic war of
terror massacring large numbers of innocent villagers, men women and children
in bomb explosions setting claymore bombs in buses , trains, and in market
places. They invented suicide bombs that assassinated the Indian
Prime Minister, a President of Sri Lanka, Several Government Ministers, Army
and Police Officers, and wounded a President of Sri Lanka and the Commander of
the Armed Forces. They used pistol gangs
to kill many Tamil politicians and intellectuals. They killed the Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister using
a sniper.

All these
and more massacres, assassinations, ruthless murders and crimes committed by
the terrorists are well documented.
Compared to this ruthless well documented murderous history of the
terrorists, what ever human rights violation, or war crimes that are supposed
to have been committed during the military operations of the Sri Lanka
Armed Forces during the last two weeks before the elimination of the terrorists
are insignificant.

But the
selection of this two weeks( the last
phase) to accuse the Government of Sri Lanka and the Armed Forces for violation
of human rights and war crimes is deliberate as
in any war from Hiroshima to Sri
Lanka the most confusing period of a war is the last moments of the war
as there is utter confusion , and eye witnesses do not survive to tell the tale.

After five
years what actually happened at the last
phase of the war is over shadowed with
falsehood, imaginary stories, prepared evidence like the UK Channel 4
documents, and even stories invented by terrorists themselves who have become
ordinary persons washed of their criminal past, like Ananthi Sasitharan the wife of a terrorist Ellalai who recruited
children for terrorists forces, and now
living safely in Jaffna. Elected as a
Provincial Councillor she comes now before the UNHRC wailing about the crimes committed by the Sri
Lanka Armed Forces against the Tamil women.

Five years
after the elimination of the terrorts, investigating into what happened during the last phase of the
war is inappropriate, as all that past is clouded and the resulting
search would only be imagined and
invented harrowing tales. Therefore, if
an investigation is necessary it should be for the past 25 years and not just the last two weeks. An investigation of the past 25 years of
terrorism will show proof without any reasonable doubt of their ruthless
crimes, and make it evident the
necessity of their elimination at
whatever cost , and what ever was the out come at the last phase.

In view of
all that, what is the necessity of the USA
resolution against Sri Lanka ?

How is this
International Investigation USA is proposing in the Resolution they are
presenting help the Tamil people now ?

Is it to satisfy the conscious of those Tamil
Expatriate Terrorist Front Organisations in the USA,
Canada, UK, Netherland and else where outside Sri Lanka and their Agents the Tamil National
Alliance in Sri Lanka,
or is there an ulterior motive by the sponsor of the Resolution- USA and its
Allies of the West ?

It is
evident Respected Delegates, that USA
has taken the initiative to move this Resolution against Sri Lanka for
other political reasons of its own, under cover of redressing any discrimination committed against the Tamils people by the Sri Lanka Government
or its Armed Forces.

The
resolution has nothing to do with the elimination of terrorists by the Armed
Forces of Sri Lanka. It has more to it than meets the eye.

When USA State Department sent its Ambassador-
at- Large Stephen Rapp, the Assistant Secretary for South Asian Affairs Nisha Desai Biswal, or even Navi Pillai, the UN Commissioner of Human Rights ( not forgetting that UN is now
an extended arm of the USA State Department) to investigate the situation prior
to preparing the damning resolution, they went only to the North of Sri Lanka,
and interviewed persons or groups who
were known to be anti Government or the known anti Government Tamil News Paper
Office Udayan.

But the people in the South of Sri Lanka suffered
as much from terrorism, and many former Sinhala and Muslim residents of Jaffna who were chased
away by the terrorists now live in the South.
But none of these American or the UNHRC investigators visited the
South, and speak to the people who had directly suffered from terrorism, nor
did the visit the Media offices in the south as they did in the North.
Therefore, these investigations were superficial and carried out to fit into an
already decided plan of action.

This means that
all these US State Department emissaries
were only a cover up as the US State Department all the time knew what the resolution is going to be. The underlying reason for the US Resolution
against Sri Lanka is to engage with Sri Lanka, in a more cunning way by sending International Investigators,
NGOs, human rights activists and journalists with the right to move about in
Sri Lanka unchallenged, have access to anti government media offices and put as many people as they
can against the Government.

It would
then be possible to create a rebellious situations like those in Egypt, and Tunisia putting people against
people, and arm if possible the
rebellious groups allowing the International Community to intervene and eventually force the government to step down.

That is a
possible scenario Respected Delegates, these have happened in Chile, Iran, etc. and continue to happen
elsewhere. USA has still the CIA with all the know how for
creating appropriate situations to
remove populer Presidents.

Are you
allowing that to happen in Sri Lanka
by voting for the USA
Resolution against Sri Lanka
to be presented at the UNHRCouncil
Sessions ?

If you
would go through the resolution and read
the demand No. 5 you will note that it is to
make Sri Lanka subjugate its
rights of governance , and policy development to USA and its its Western allies.
This is a very high handed demand the intention of which is to keep Sri Lanka dependent and loyal to the Senate of USA,
which demands the control Sri Lanka’s
economic and Security interests.

Under this resolution
USA may dictate our choice
of the political system of Governance, our economic relations with other
countries such as China,
Russia etc., and even the deployment of armed forces within Sri Lanka.

This
obnoxious demand No.5 of the US
Resolution reads: (5)calls upon the President todevelop a comprehensive policy
towards Sri Lanka that reflectsUnited States interests,including respect for human rights,
democracy and the rule of law, economic interests, and security interests.

Therefore,
as a patriot of Sri Lanka- which became Independent from British Colonial Rule
in 1948, and which is now an Independent Sovereign State and wishing to protect
that Sovereignty of Sri Lanka intact, I
request you to please vote against this most undemocratic , cunningly phrased
resolution meant to dupe the honourable Delegates, to demand of them their vote
to take control of Sri Lanka and do what it pleases with a puppet government
put in place.

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

India has a leadership problem. It is living in fear of disintegration,
therefore the Government of India has become a prisoner of an old Tamil racist
politician Karunanidhi , and a Tamil racist old film star Jayalalitha from Tamil Nadu.

Both of them are full of hatred and without
any sense of real politics. It looks
as in India there is only Tamil Nadu, the
rest of the country has been
overshadowed by it. Where ever there are
Tamil politicians there are problems, as Sri Lanka has learnt to its detriment.

Whether India could escape from this Tamilnadu trap to
establish a strong government which could decide its foreign policies without
having to depend on sentimental attachments of individual States to become a leader nation in Asia
is doubtful. It appears nothing would change even with a new Prime Minister taking over reins of
Indian government.

Already the manner in
which a new Indian government would
prepare its future policies has been announced
by Vaiko- a racist politician
from TamilNadu who has made the Sri Lanka Tamil issue his raison d’être. He had said, “Bharatiya Janata Party’s prime
ministerial candidate Narendra Modi has assured that no military support would
be given to Sri Lanka
in the event of his party coming to power. ”

Vaiko has already prepared the ground for a
future Indian Prime Minister to prepare his Foreign policy to suit TamilNadu’s political
fantasy, keeping India a
lackey of the USA and the
West, without ever realising that India’s
future is in association with China,
Russia, Pakistan, Iran, and other Asian countries. India is a half
hearted member of the SAARC.

We do not know what part India played in the elimination of terrorism, as
it appears to be a well kept secret of the Government of Sri Lanka to be calling
India
more than a friend. In response to this exaggerated show of gratitude India’s
Foreign Minister Salman Kurshid had
rightly said that India is
not Sri Lanka’s
big brother but only a political
partner.

If India had actively participated
with the Government of Sri Lanka in the
elimination of terrorism, it was also in the interest of India as
terrorism in Sri Lanka had its fall out
in India for which it paid dearly, which seems to be forgotten in Congress
Party’s ambition for political existence.

For an outsider, India’s part in
Sri Lanka’s
war against terrorists did not show any friendly partnership let alone the
understanding of a big brother. The few instances that showed India’s unfriendly
intention of letting down Sri Lanka when ever a situation arises were when 40,0000 Soldiers were trapped in Jaffna without transport and about to be attacked by
the terrorists, and an appeal to provide transport was refused by the India government.

It was thanks to Pakistan that provided arms that the army was
able to drive away the terrorists avoiding an imminent disaster to the Sri Lanka armed Forces.

Secondly it was when India sold a second hand outmoded radar system to Sri Lanka which could not detect the terrorist
planes that bombed the airport in Colombo, and thirdly
it was when India refused to
sell arms and forbade Sri Lanka
buying arms from China. Finally when India
stepped into the portals of world
leaders it forgot the neighbour and voted against Sri
Lanka along with USA
and the rest of the Western buddies at the UNHRCounil Sessions, and now tells India was never Sri Lanka’s big brother, but only a
political partner.

Time has come now to strike off India as a friend of Sri Lanka, and call a spade a spade as partnerships in war
are temporary and soon forgotten after wars.
India always had an
expansionist interest vis à vis Sri
Lanka and nothing else, and was never a
friend or even an honest partner if it had any hand in the terrorist war. India
promoted terrorism in Sri Lanka
with RAW training Tamil youth from Sri Lanka
in terrorism in special camps set up in India with instructors to train
them.

It was only when India realised that Prabhakaran cannot be satisfied with promises and small hand outs and asked for more that India became conscious of the fact
that in training a group of Tamil
youth from Sri Lanka
in terrorism, it had in fact created a Frankenstein which had gone out of its
control. The first victim of that error was Rajiv Gandhi India’s Prime Minister.

Karunanidhi of TamilNadu played a principle role in the
assassination of Rajiv Ghandi, but paradoxically it is Karunanidhi and Tamil
Nadu that still keep India
under their thumbs. India
has also become a puppet in the Hands of
USA and the West subjugating its sovereignty
to the prestige of being amoung the high and mighty big wigs of the West,
even if USA
were to denude its women diplomatsfor body checks.

India is politically so swollen headed in being with
the USA
and the West it does not follow the other South Asian Countries in
international forums despite its membership in the SAARC. At the previous 22 session of the UNHRCouncil in Geneva,
from amoung the Asian Countries present
it was only India and South
Korea that voted against Sri Lanka.

India more than any one else knows
that Sri Lanka did not commit any of what the USA and the West accuse Sri Lanka
to have done at the last phase of
military operations against terrorism.
But India yet
continues to stand with USA
against Sri Lanka to please Tamil Nadu
politicians whose only political vision is the Sri Lanka Tamil problem of which
they know nothing except that the Tamil terrorists were eliminated.

India now says, “… the
Mahinda Rajapaksa government has done precious little on the ground. It is
dragging feet on implementing recommendations made by the Lessons Learnt and
Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) set up by itself. ” India knows what Sri Lanka has done for the
welfare of the Tamil people of the North and East, having even obtained the
right to open a Consular Office of India in the North.

Even if Sri Lanka were to
implement 100 per cent of the LLRC
report, USA and the West will still not be satisfied, as their agenda is the
separation of the North and East to set up an American marine base for its
Pacific Fleet in the Northern seas of Sri Lanka to control the influence of
China and Russia in that part of the sea.

India has not even a good
neighbourly relation with Sri
Lanka and will continue with its
expansionist intentions. Therefore Sri Lanka
should take precautionary measures, in cutting down its political relations
with India.

Salman Kurshid had
told a visiting group of Sri
Lanka journalists, “ We are in an election mood. In
election time it is not always easy to explain to people.” Lanka should do things that will enable India to help
it”. He has added, “…. While everyone realises that a 30-year
conflict cannot be resolved overnight, Lanka cannot take 30 years to bring
about reconciliation,…. Sri Lankans will have to find means to satisfy the
world, while convincing the world that it needs more time to find its own
solution at a pace and in a time frame convenient to it. ”

India does not understand
that USA
and the West take action according to a prearranged agenda of bringing
developing countries under their control
to retain their political leadership in the world. Therefore they will continue political
manoeuvres even to set up governments in other countries, as it was recently
reported:

US State Department Assistant Secretary for Europe and European Affairs
Victoria Nuland was caught on tape last week confirming that the U.S. is now
openly spending 5 billion US dollars to effect 'regime change' in Ukraine.Nuland
told Geoffrey Pyatt, the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, she had discussed the plan
with U.N. Undersecretary for Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman and that he
would appoint a U.N. representative to help move it forward.

And who is this Jeffrey Feltman? A career American diplomat, Feltman
served as the most senior State Department official on the Middle
East from 2009 moved from US Foreign Service in May 2013 to take
the United Nations Number Three job, Undersecretary General for Political
Affairs. (http://www.asiantribune.com/node/70986)

India wants to implicate Sri Lanka, and will vote for the USA
resolution against Sri Lanka,
and even help the TNA to set up the TamilEelamState. DMK of Karunanidhi has already instructed Indian Central Government
what it should do: "The Centre
should not fall prey to the Sri Lankan government and should stand by the U.S. when the resolution against the Sri Lankan
government for its human rights violations is moved in the UNHRC."

Sri Lanka can do without India. The Government of Sri Lanka should proceed
with long needed actions which had been withheld for what ever reason, such
as the removal of 13A from the
Constitution, demanding the closing up of the Indian Consular Office in Jaffna,
and initiate criminal action against the TNA as the agents of the LTTE
terrorists for the crimes committed by
them for 30 years. These actions had been withheld perhaps in order not to
embarrass India.
To-day the situation has changed.

The 13the Amendment to the constitution should have
been removed immediately the Indian Peace Keeping Force left the Island. The 13 Amendment was included into the
Constitution under the Indo-Lanka Pact. The agreement in terms of that Pact was
for the IPKF to disarm the terrorists, and for Sri Lanka Government to implement
the proposed 13 Amendment to the Constitution.
The Indian Government in withdrawing the IPKF without having disarmed
the terrorists breached the Indo Lanka Pact.

Hence the Government is no longer bound to keep the 13 Amendment in the
Constitution, even if it has already been implemented. The implication of the breach of the
Indo-Lanka Pact should be studied by our legal luminaries in terms of the Vienna Convention on the Law
of Treaties of the 23 May,1969, and legal proceedings should be initiated for a
court order to remove the 13 Amendment
from the Constitution of Sri Lanka.

Secondly, The Government of Sri Lanka should demand India
to close the Indian Consular Office in Jaffna. It was the Indian RAW that was responsible
for the training of the Sri Lanka terrorists, therefore the presence of
an Indian Consular Office in Jaffna
is a security concern.

Furthermore, Jaffna which was the centre of terrorist activities in Sri Lanka. It is still not completely secure from terrorism
as TNA the Political Party that has formed the Provincial Council in the
North was a proxy-party of the
terrorists. They continue promoting
terrorism or terrorism like activities, such us not allowing the Sri Lanka flag
to be hoisted at ceremonies, not Singing
the National Anthem in Sinhala, and promote separatist propaganda demanding the construction of monuments in
memory of the dead terrorists. Therefore the presence of India’s
Consular Office in Jaffna
is all the more a security risk.

Thirdly, the TNA had been allowed to carry out unconstitutional activities without a word
raised against them without even a
warning for whatever diplomatic or political reason. But now Sri Lanka is being accused by the USA and the
Western Countries for no other reason but for the elimination of terrorism. The TNA is largely responsible for
instigating, fanning the flames of terrorism, and providing false evidence to
the USA and International Community to accuse Sri Lanka as a violator of human
rights and responsible for war crimes.

Even the wife
of the former terrorist Ellalai, Ananthi Sasitharna is a member of the TNA and
a Council Mermber of the NPC. She has given false evidence to American
Ambassador at Large Stephen Rapp and the Assistant Secretary of State for South
Asian Affairs Nisha Desai Biswal. Though she is now speaking for the rights of the women in the Northern Province her
husband Ellalai was the recruiter of
Children for the terrorist armed force.

The Government should now proceed to take criminal investigations on the members of the
TNA for the role they had played during
the period of terrorism.

Fr. Vimal Tirimanna CSsR wrote in the Island
of 18 February,2014:

“TNA was proxy to the LTTE for nearly a decade. As
such, since the LTTE is no longer in existence, it is the TNA that should be
held responsible for the terrible atrocities committed by the LTTE because they
were accomplices to all those crimes. If the government is to be held
responsible for the alleged ‘war crimes’, then for far worse terrorist crimes
of the LTTE, the TNA should be held responsible by any "international
community".

The Government of Sri Lanka should stop further
bilateral trade agreements with India. Sri Lanka
should increase bilateral trade with Pakistan, China,
Russia, Vietnam, S.Korea,
Iran and Bangladesh.

Our Minsters should stop calling on the Ministers of
India to discuss internal affairs of Sri Lanka as it had been happening
in the past. The government should not
extend the visa on arrival facility to Indians.
Government of Sri
Lanka should refuse training of Sri Lankans
in South Indian educational or Military Institutions.