Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Profiteering off murder and misery: Who does more damage, the MSM or murderabilia peddlers?

Since Texas passed a law a decade or so ago banning so-called "murderabilia," or selling mementos from famous killers, I found it interesting to notice via the Waco Tribune Herald that several items related to famed bank robbers Bonnie and Clyde are up for auction this weekend. The Texas law has never been effectively enforced, in part because of the rise of out-of-state Internet auction sites, and it only bans killers themselves profiting from such items, so it wouldn't affect Bonnie and Clyde memorabilia, in any event. But the auction underlines how faint is the difference between "murderabilia" and "history." Some of the items on sale were formerly displayed at the Texas Ranger Museum in Waco. Texas' statute on murderabilia, as described by the Houston Chronicle, "calls for the confiscation of any profits that are inflated because of a criminal's notoriety." To me, though, it is the mainstream media more than anyone else who chiefly profits from criminals' "notoriety": Sensationalist crime coverage is their bread and butter, exemplified by the local TV news mantra, "If it bleeds, it leads."

Former federal District Judge Nancy Gertner, who retired last year to teach at Harvard Law School, recently authored an opinion piece titled "The Media's Reporting on Justice is Criminal" which critiqued the MSM for "beating the drum" in individual cases with formulaic, slanted coverage that misunderstands and distorts the criminal justice process. The reason the media do that, of course, is that it draws more eyeballs, for the same reason people slow down on the freeway to gawk at a gruesome accident. And since advertisers follow eyeballs, and advertising revenue is dwindling, in the 21st century the incentive to sensationalize crime for profit has reached heretofore unseen heights. (Witness Nancy Grace.) That's the main reason why the public thinks crime is rising even though crime rates, particularly for violent crimes, are at modern lows.

One person's murderabilia is another person's historical artifact. But neither murderers nor collectors would be able to profit from "murderabilia" if the MSM hadn't beaten them to the punch in profiteering off crime and misery.

10:53, I realize you repeat the same comment no matter what the subject, but the question posed was whether "murderabilia" peddlers or the MSM are more culpable for profiteering off victims' misery. The murderer sitting in prison can't control what the media does, or the auctioneer. That's on them.

The Murderabilia bill was passed not in an attempt to void historical relevance; but rather to stop the "cottage" industry of murderer's profiting off their notoriety. The gun that belonged to Clyde Barrow may have historical relevance. Charles Manson's toenail and fingernail clippings do not.Neither did Berkowitz's or Gacy's paintings. It was specifically targeted to prevent convict's from profiting from their crimes after conviction.

Grits:Nancy Grace, regardless of anyone's opinion, is not a convicted criminal, especially not a notorious murderer such as Manson or Berkowitz. While some may say that it is reprehensible that she gets an astronomical paycheck for blatant sensationalism, her money is not going into the trust fund of some unrepentant animal who would not have any significance, Darwinian or otherwise, except for the fact that they committed horrendous crimes.

Semperfine, the murderers aren't the ones setting up internet auction sites, that's done by outside vendors for one reason: Demand ginned up by the media. The MSM profiteering off misery is what enables the subsidiary market for murderabilia, which wouldn't exist without it.

Also, fwiw, collectors decide what does and doesn't have historical relevance, not politicians, and their choices are mainly a function of media decisions about what's newsworthy. The media hype around Bonnie and Clyde is little different from that surrounding Charles Manson, and to the extent either are historically significant, it has mostly to do with the MSM's choices based on what sells papers, draws viewers, etc.. IMO it's hypocritical for the media to demagogue (as they frequently do) about "murderabilia" when they're the worst offenders of all profiteering off of the actions of killers and creeps.

GfB Writer Bios

Subscribe by email

Support Grits via Donation

Donate to Grits via PayPal. Grits is a hobby, but donations help cover newspaper subscriptions, periodic travel, open records fees, etc.. Donate if you can! When I have resources, the blog can do more stuff!

"I always tell people interested in these issues that your blog is the most important news source, and have had high-ranking corrections officials tell me they read it regularly."

- Scott Medlock, Texas Civil Rights Project

"a helluva blog"

- Solomon Moore, NY Times criminal justice correspondent

"Congrats on building one of the most read and important blogs on a specific policy area that I've ever seen"

- Donald Lee, Texas Conference of Urban Counties

GFB "is a fact-packed, trustworthy reporter of the weirdness that makes up corrections and criminal law in the Lone Star State" and has "shown more naked emperors than Hans Christian Andersen ever did."

-Attorney Bob Mabry, Conroe

"Grits really shows the potential of a single-state focused criminal law blog"

- Corey Yung, Sex Crimes Blog

"I regard Grits for Breakfast as one of the most welcome and helpful vehicles we elected officials have for understanding the problems and their solutions."

Tommy Adkisson,Bexar County Commissioner

"dude really has a pragmatic approach to crime fighting, almost like he’s some kind of statistics superhero"

- Rob Patterson, The Austin Post"Scott Henson's 'Grits for Breakfast' is one of the most insightful blogs on criminal justice issues in Texas."

- Texas Public Policy Foundation

"Nobody does it better or works harder getting it right"

David Jennings, aka "Big Jolly"

"I appreciate the fact that you obviously try to see both sides of an issue, regardless of which side you end up supporting."

Kim Vickers,Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and EducationGrits for Breakfast "has probably broken more criminal justice stories than any TX reporter, but stays under the radar. Fascinating guy."

Maurice Chammah,The Marshall Project"unrestrained and uneducated"

John Bradley,Former Williamson County District Attorney, now former Attorney General of Palau

"our favorite blog"

- Texas District and County Attorneys Association Twitter feed"Scott Henson ... writes his terrific blog Grits for Breakfast from an outhouse in Texas."