Mods are users too. We'll only investigate a link if it has enough reports about pseudoscience (otherwise someone could go on a trolling spree and report everything) or if it has an extraordinary claim in the title (extraordinary claims will require evaluation). We will also be appointing more moderators if we deem the workflow to be excessive.

Look, there's a difference between a radical claim pseudoscience. If someone posts a link to a theory like, I don't know... the earth is flat, and the theory actually follows the proper scientific method, then it's fine to stay. On the other hand, if it's merely pretending to do so, then it isn't. I don't know if I explained this well or not, but there you go.

I have put our rules into trial period, I hope you guys have no objections. Please do not delete posts that do not fall outside the bounds of the rules and please inform all users if their posts have been removed (egregious repeat offenders need not be notified for every post, as it is timewasting).