Pokie Review Of Murder For Two

Jeff Blumenkrantz — bald, gangly and boisterously over-the-top — plays all the suspects. Brett Ryback — more of the straight man, though equally suited to the role of the lovable loser getting another chance at redemption — plays would-be detective Officer Marcus.

This damage which occurs within the neck muscles, results when the top strikes very fast backward and then ahead.

New York, NY. Time Out New York Critics' Pick. —Time Out New York. “Ingenious! A snazzy double-act!” New York Times Critics' Pick. —The New York Times. “A hilarious musical whodunit!” —The New York Observer. “A must-see minute jolt of caffeinated creativity!” —NY1. “A charmingly frenetic new musical comedy Missing: pokie.

Leaping and inclined off to the right or perhaps the remaining could end in a skipped goal.

The men take turns on the piano, accompanying each other when a character trots out one of the show's goofy numbers. Occasionally, a turf battle ensues, but more commonly the fellows amicably share responsibility for providing musical punctuation in a show that is more sketch comedy than traditional book musical. A slightly overstretched divertissement that has turned out to have commercial legs, the show, which opened Wednesday at the Geffen Playhouse's Audrey Skirball Kenis Theater, will delight those who find this sort of frolicsome caper ingenious rather than jejune.

Still, one has to be swept away by the zany delirium of it all, and I found myself resisting for two reasons. The characters in this murder mystery are such a mishmash that a theatrical world, even of the spoof variety, isn't convincingly established.

And Scott Schwartz's direction doesn't do enough to modulate Blumenkrantz's raucous playing style.

The book, which Kinosian and Blair wrote together, revolves around the question of who killed novelist Arthur Whitney inside his spooky mansion on the night of his surprise birthday party. The suspect list includes Arthur's bitter wife Blumenkrantz wearing round glasses and adopting a psychotic Southern drawla ballerina Blumenkrantz looking aloof and occasionally elevating a limb and an unhappily married couple Blumenkrantz bickering with himself.

A secret-spilling psychiatrist, a student criminologist who instantly falls for Marcus and three tough tykes from a boys' choir — all frenetically caricatured by Blumenkrantz — also figure in the jury-rigged plot.

The gimmick is that these weirdos appeared as characters in Arthur's books, but the literary parody is just a pretext for farcical mugging and unbridled horseplay.

"A Perfectly Lovely Surprise" from Murder for Two at The 5th Avenue Theatre & ACT Theatre

While Warren is ultimately the greater of two equals simply because of his miraculous and constant transformation, Schenfisch holds his own with wide-eyed determination in his one-character task as the hapless cop, with the mad antics of the pair tied together neatly under the supervision of choreographer-director Lindy Heath Davis. The score by Kinosian and lyrics by Blair are appropriately lean and delightfully old-fashioned, harking back musically to the mild jazz of tin-pan alley and the comical rhymes and wordplay of the era of Porter and Gershwin.

Multi-tasking as music director, Davis also supervised the vaudevillian keyboard showmanship, while Schenfisch and Warren supplied appropriately unpretentious vocal delivery in this hilariously fine showcase of two extraordinarily versatile and funny entertainers.

Novomatic Pokies Facebook Iniciar

Pokies $ Rapper Eve

Pokies $ Rapper Eve

5 Reel Pokies Bouncing Horse

5 Reel Pokies Bouncing Horse

Pokie Finders Fee Agreement

Pokie Finders Fee Agreement

To inquire about advertising on our site, please use the comment form. You can review our Privacy Policy here.

Embrace brand favourability, Murder Of Two For Review Pokie Anuj

Please complete some of the basic information below to sign up for our weekly newsletter. We value your privacy and our own. Your date of birth is required to ensure all users are at least 13 years of age in accordance with our policies and state and federal laws.

We ask for your ZIP code to determine certain eligibilities and for demographic purposes, but we will not use any personal, identifiable information.

Pokies Money Zine Mortgage

Pokies Money Zine Mortgage

Pokie Machines With Magnets

Pokie Machines With Magnets

Pokies Big Red Motorsports Oneill

Pokies Big Red Motorsports Oneill

Can even create Igt Pokies Jogging In A Jug Football has all the time been

Jeremy Legat (left) and Ed MacArthur in Murder for Two at the Watermill, Bagnor. Joe Kinosian and Kellen Blair’s neatly conceived if over-egged musical is a jokey whodunnit performed by two actors who not only take on all 14 characters but also play the score on the coinsluckyz.comg: pokie.:

"Murder for Two," a two-character spoof by Joe Kinosian (book & music) and Kellen Blair (book & lyrics) of an old-fashioned stage whodunit, is the first musical produced by Second Stage at its Uptown venue. Pity it lands with such a coinsluckyz.comg: pokie. It's Milwaukee Rep's 'Murder for Two,' a farcical whodunit full of shady suspects, frenetic character shifts, multiple murder weapons, plot twists and death-defying piano playing. In Arts & Entertainment Reviews. Matt Edmonds . Tags: theater, agatha christie, murder for two, stackner cabaret, joe kinosian. A Night of Mystery slot game is all about playing detective and uncovering clues on what might have happened in a night filled with mayhem, murder, and mystery. As you unravel the mysteries, you will come across wilds, Stacked symbols, and a Clue Collection Bonus round. You will also expose more secret riches in the.

Poole had been supposed to go to work on the night of the murder, two men having called for her, but she decided not to go as she was not feeling well. She had then a visit Pressed for the nickname, Holahan went into a light trance and, via automatic writing, produced the word "pokie." Ruark's nickname.:

While the two murder victims did not know each other, Ms Morton and Mr Houston were closely linked to the suspect, who cannot be identified, at the time they disappeared. The man, an itinerant who has lived in a Housing SA premises at Whyalla since , has been questioned by police investigating. A review should find how a man slipped through a "comprehensive" adoption process and murdered his month-old daughter two weeks after formally adopting her, a child protection expert has said. Matthew Scully-Hicks, 31, of Delabole, Cornwall, inflicted a catalogue of injuries on Elsie at their Cardiff. Colin Pitchfork was given a life sentence in for the rape and murder of year-old Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire. His case was referred to the Parole Board to review his suitability for release. Colin Pitchfork, 22 at the time of the first murder, was married with two sons. He was.

A look at how the various investigations into the murder of Daniel Morgan in south-east London in :

Best Place Entertainment Museums Marquette. Recent happenings in Riverwest. Recent happenings in The Third Ward. Upcoming events in Third Ward Annie December 19 7: Zombies from the Beyond February 7 7: The Brothers Size February 21 - March 18 7: Recent happenings in Walker's Point. Biotechnology adn Bioeconomy Conference May 7 - May 8 Recent happenings in Wauwatosa.

Latest guides in Dining. West Allis dining guide Wauwatosa dining guide In search of Milwaukee's perfect pizza. Still I'm certain he interviewed the medium herself with the typical thoroughness we've come to expect of an SPR investigator. But in their article, Playfair and Keen note that Lundy, at least, is "now retired and, we were informed, not available for interview. There is no mention of McKinlay, but given his apparent antipathy to the idea that Holohan contributed anything of value to the case, it is certainly possible that he also refused to talk.

By the same token, some people would not talk to Youens and his associate: Tony Batters very kindly supplied me with a copy of his notes along with how they related to the crime. We exchanged numerous emails … Adrian Shaw spoke to Detective Chief Inspector Norman McKinlay as well as the detective who originally took Ruark in for questioning and also retrieved the pullover from his dustbin.

Lundy was the officer in charge of the original investigation and McKinlay dealt with the re-investigation. We did contact other officers who either did not wish to discuss the case or never returned our calls. If it's slipshod of the SPR investigators not to get through to Lundy and McKinlay, isn't it equally slipshod of Youens and Shaw not to get through to anyone other than Batters, Lundy, McKinlay, and an unnamed detective?

There is no indication that they spoke to Holohan, Smith, or Jacqui Poole's relatives, for instance. They even signed affidavits attesting to the accuracy of the resulting article. Playfair and Keen report:.

As Batters has repeatedly told us, the only possible single source for all the information [provided by Holohan] is Jacqueline Poole … Tony Batters stated that "I've accepted the fact that Jacqui communicated with Christine," as, he has told us, have all his police colleagues with whom he has discussed the case.

Alternatively, you can read the article by subscribing to the Lexscien database , which maintains the SPR's archive. Lexscien charges a fee, but there is a workaround: The seven-day trial does not allow you to download the full article for offline reading or printout. There's a book on the Jacqui Poole case: I've ordered a copy.

Perhaps it will shed further light on some of the loose ends mentioned in the post. If paranormal investigator's presented a case for the validity of mediumship, NDE's or psi using Tony Youens and Adrian Shaw's style of arguing, they would be laughed out of the room.

Sure, investigators speculate and theorize when they're musing about causes, but no recognized credible paranormal researcher would ever resort to possibilities to shore up the foundation of their evidence. Rabbitdawg September 15, at How much time would she have had if she actually gathered all that information normal means? I mean it is not at all easy and VERY time consuming finding the right informants, talking to them etc.

September 15, at Paul September 15, at Very good points about the lack of time. Poole's body was discovered on Sunday. The murder became general knowledge among the locals on Monday.

Holohan talked to the police on Wednesday. So she would have had only about 48 hours to gather all this info from various sources including, it would seem, the killer himself!

And she could not have gone about collecting info in any obvious way, such as approaching Poole's friends and family; such behavior would have been noticed and remembered. She would have had to do it on the sly - presumably while holding down her regular job. Michael Prescott September 16, at And that would be impossible! I am a lawyer by profession so I am trained in gathering a good amount of various information in a short amount of time.

Even though I currently have an occupation that does not involve talking to witnesses I spent the obligatory time at a prosecutor and was at court while I was trained and I know first hand how incredibly time consuming it is to get information from "human sources" talking to witnesses. For one witness who proves a good source of information you have two spent hours on interviewing people who in fact cannot contribute anything!

And concerning other facts she knew it needs to be considered that this was before the internet! It is the same with very young kids talking about previous lives: As my eldest child is now 4 years old and fairly intelligent as are her friends I can attest that it is impossible for a kid the same age or even younger to invent a realistic or coherent story or to teach a kid that type of story.

That is beyond what a years old can do. But interestingly sceptics rather attribute capabilities to human beings they do not possess than accepting the paranormal September 16, at Bruce Siegel September 16, at This one reminds me of a very similar case in Chicago that made headlines in the late seventies.

Teresita Basa, a nurse working in Evanston, was also found murdered in her apartment. Later, she appeared to, and spoke thru, a coworker, naming her killer and giving specific details.

Detectives followed up and were able to get a confession from the named suspect. While not proving survival, these cases certainly add to the case for life after death.

It is interesting, that the people who are brave enough to step forward, are immediately accused of fraud or lies. In the Basa case, the coworker, married to a Doctor, had much to lose in telling her paranormal story. If she had heard things or had suspicions, why not just say it? Why make up the paranormal aspect? Maybe because that is the way these things actually happen. Greg L September 16, at Teresita Basa was one of my very favorite Unsolved segments! Too bad the links no longer work; I'd love to watch it again.

Ginny September 16, at Those of a certain age may remember the case of the kidnap and murder in the s of the former Italian prime minister, and at the time president of the Christian Democrats, Aldo Moro at the hands of the Red Brigade.

I stumbled on a reference to the following in a footnote on Wikipedia. The full story is in the Independent article linked below but here are the key facts:.

During the 55 days he was held in captivity everyone in Italy desperately speculated where the kidnappers could possibly be keeping Aldo Moro. At one point something extraordinary happened. Romano Prodi, himself later prime minister and also president of the European Commission, went to the police with a remarkable tip off.

He reported how he and a group of university academic friends had spent a Sunday afternoon attempting a seance with a Ouija board. They appeared to get responses from what was identified as the spirit of another, recently deceased, senior Christian Democrat called Giorgio La Pira. Having established this they asked what everyone wanted to know "where are they holding Aldo Moro?

The Ouija spelled out in turn 3 place names.. The first two were instantly identified as known places, but Gradoli meant nothing to anyone. Until that is they located a village of that name in an Atlas, to their own apparently great surprise.

This fact - that a place that existed but no one had heard of had turned up in response to their question - prompted Prodi to risk ridicule and inform the police.

The village of Gradoli was duly raided and searched and The lead seemed another dead end. After Moro was murdered and his body disposed of it was determined that he had been kept during most of his captivity in an apartment in a street in Rome called The gist of the Independent article is that Prodi's political opponents, skeptics and the public at large take it virtually as read that he "obviously" made the whole seance "nonsense" up to cover up for someone.. But from the report I can't find any suggestion of evidence that this is the case Lawrence B September 16, at Paul September 16, at Matt Rouge September 16, at I know another case similar to this case and the case of Teresita Basa, the case of Giuseppe Veraldi:.

Juan September 17, at According to the skeptiko forums at least, there seems to be a group of fringe materialists suggesting that psi-like effects can be explained by de-coupling the idea of time's linearity from classical physics. Of course, one could set such an attempted explanation in the same camp as super psi if one wanted. Joshua Cearley September 18, at Hey, it all starts with recognizing that the phenomena exist.

If they recognize that psi, the Afterlife, etc. Matt Rouge September 18, at Matt,I had an interesting experience with this once. I went to Paris with a friend, and we walked all over the city for six days. One day by accident we came to this plaza - neither of us had any idea what it was about and no one was around. I had the strangest feeling there - I suddenly felt very very cold and I'm usually much warmer than those around me and had an intense feeling of loneliness and despair.

I was having a fantastic time in Paris and had no idea why I felt this way. My friend reported similar feelings. That night my friend found out where we had been. It was the Place de Concorde, where thousands of people had been guillotined during the French Revolution. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media.

Such third party cookies may track your use of the BBC website. We and our partners also use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the BBC website. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. These are external links and will open in a new window. On the 24th anniversary of private detective Daniel Morgan's death, the inquiry into his murder outside a pub in Sydenham, south-east London, collapsed.

Since , the Metropolitan Police Met said it had dealt with , documents, taken 8, actions, provided 6, statements, gathered 17, exhibits and interviewed witnesses. Daniel Morgan's body, with an axe embedded in his head, is found in the car park of the Golden Lion pub in Sydenham.

Six men are arrested over the murder but police find there was not enough evidence to charge any of them. The review by Hampshire Constabulary looks at "allegations that police were involved in the murder of Daniel Morgan".

Recent happenings in Riverwest. Recent happenings in The Third Ward. Upcoming events in Third Ward Annie December 19 7: Zombies from the Beyond February 7 7: The Brothers Size February 21 - March 18 7: Recent happenings in Walker's Point.

Biotechnology adn Bioeconomy Conference May 7 - May 8 Recent happenings in Wauwatosa. Le Reve Restaurants Bakeries Wauwatosa. And even if he had noticed the cups, what reason would there be to talk about them? Youens himself admits that his speculation in this area is not very convincing. In fairness I cannot fully explain this away and neither am I likely to be able to, but if all the other details had been removed would the police have been so impressed with what information was left?

Personally I doubt it. Of course, this assumes that "all other details" can be removed -- i. Another line of Youens' attack is to say that Holohan's contribution had no effect on the outcome of the case. According to Youens, Ruark's eventual conviction was entirely due to scientific investigation the DNA testing and had nothing to do with mediumship. Much has been made of the pullover retrieved from Ruark's dustbin and how if it wasn't for Holohan's information this might never have been seized.

But just how significant did this piece of evidence turn out to be? When asked by Adrian Shaw, D. The pullover played no part and even if it did it was not due to anything Holohan had said.

These three elements were vital to combat potential and actual defences, which I believe would have raised sufficient doubt as to lead to a Not Guilty verdict. This echoes a comment Batters made in It is hard to reconcile those different views.

Either the incriminating DNA was taken from Ruark's pullover, or it was taken from Poole's fingernails. But it is interesting to notice the rather ambiguous nature of Youens' sentence: It sounds as if he is backtracking from his first statement even before the sentence has ended. And it is unclear how "the pullover played no part" if Lundy "does recall 'fibres' being mentioned at the trial.

In this respect, Youens' essay raises more questions than it answers. A BBC article on the case, which doesn't mention Holohan or mediumship, reports that the conviction was obtained by DNA-testing semen left on an article of Poole's clothing found at the murder scene.

If this is accurate, it undercuts the claim that the pullover found in Ruark's trash, not at the crime scene was the crucial piece of evidence, although it also undercuts Youens' contention that the evidence was obtained from "the victim's fingernails. For one thing, it identifies Ruark as Poole's lover, when according to the other accounts I've read, he was merely a friend of Poole's ex-husband and someone she did not like or trust.

Since the BBC article does not go into detail and does not identify the item of clothing in question, and since it states that Poole's body was found "semi-naked," I'm left wondering if the pullover in question perhaps belonged to her, and Ruark took it with him and disposed of it in his trash because it was stained with his semen.

If this is true -- I stress if , because I don't know -- then the pullover was indeed the critical piece of evidence.

It seems odd that there should be disagreement over such a seemingly basic fact of the case, but there it is. Incidentally the BBC piece also states that Poole, after being beaten and raped, was "strangled with the cord from a bathroom light," though her body was found in the living room. If true, this further substantiates Holohan's claim that the attack began or at least partly took place in the bathroom, a fact that had not been reported in the press at the time.

Youens also argues that Ruark was already a suspect in the case, and Holohan could have known this from local gossip. It is true that Ruark had voluntarily gone to the police after they asked anyone who'd known Poole to come forward. According to Batters and Smith, he was not considered a serious suspect because he had no history of violence; of the roughly 30 suspects, they say, Ruark was nowhere near the top of the list.

On the other hand, in a letter reproduced on Tony Youens' website, supervising detective Tony Lundy says that Ruark emerged as his top suspect. Montague Keen, for his part, wrote in a separate piece that, "Ruark had already given the police a persuasive alibi. He was no longer a suspect when Holohan was interviewed. Without more inforrmation, it's impossible to say who's right. Youens attributes the rest of Holohan's accurate statements to "cold reading. Nor is cold reading a likely explanation for the psychometry test that Holohan used on Andrew Smith in order to prove her abilities.

Playfair and Keen write:. She said he [Smith] had recently received a letter about essential electrical work, as indeed he had, from a Building Society telling him that he would have to get the house he hoped to buy rewired if he wanted a mortgage. She said he was about to be transferred to another station, which he thought very unlikely — until he was informed of his pending transfer only days later. Firstly, however, she made a remark which must have been unnervingly accurate.

Batters told us that "to my dying day I could not disclose what she said. It was quite extraordinary with detail.

Since Smith himself did not know he was about to be transferred, he could hardly have conveyed this information to Holohan through body language or other giveaways, as required by cold reading. Unfortunately, as the above quote indicates, some of the most convincing evidence in the case has not been made public. It would be interesting to know the first item that Holohan relayed to Smith.

It would be even more interesting to know the many specific details that she recounted about the murder itself. According to Playfair and Keen, her description of the murder was extremely graphic and as best anyone can determine through scientific reconstruction of the crime factually accurate down to the smallest detail.

Yet, out of respect for the family's sensibilities, the investigators withheld this information from the Journal article.

Obviously, the case would be further strengthened if these details could be published. As far as I am aware the investigation carried out by Keen and Playfair never included the questioning of the two most senior and highly respected detectives involved. A serious omission surely? Still I'm certain he interviewed the medium herself with the typical thoroughness we've come to expect of an SPR investigator.

But in their article, Playfair and Keen note that Lundy, at least, is "now retired and, we were informed, not available for interview. There is no mention of McKinlay, but given his apparent antipathy to the idea that Holohan contributed anything of value to the case, it is certainly possible that he also refused to talk. By the same token, some people would not talk to Youens and his associate: Tony Batters very kindly supplied me with a copy of his notes along with how they related to the crime.

We exchanged numerous emails … Adrian Shaw spoke to Detective Chief Inspector Norman McKinlay as well as the detective who originally took Ruark in for questioning and also retrieved the pullover from his dustbin. Lundy was the officer in charge of the original investigation and McKinlay dealt with the re-investigation.

We did contact other officers who either did not wish to discuss the case or never returned our calls. If it's slipshod of the SPR investigators not to get through to Lundy and McKinlay, isn't it equally slipshod of Youens and Shaw not to get through to anyone other than Batters, Lundy, McKinlay, and an unnamed detective?

There is no indication that they spoke to Holohan, Smith, or Jacqui Poole's relatives, for instance. They even signed affidavits attesting to the accuracy of the resulting article.

Playfair and Keen report:. As Batters has repeatedly told us, the only possible single source for all the information [provided by Holohan] is Jacqueline Poole … Tony Batters stated that "I've accepted the fact that Jacqui communicated with Christine," as, he has told us, have all his police colleagues with whom he has discussed the case. Alternatively, you can read the article by subscribing to the Lexscien database , which maintains the SPR's archive.

Lexscien charges a fee, but there is a workaround: The seven-day trial does not allow you to download the full article for offline reading or printout. There's a book on the Jacqui Poole case: I've ordered a copy. Perhaps it will shed further light on some of the loose ends mentioned in the post. If paranormal investigator's presented a case for the validity of mediumship, NDE's or psi using Tony Youens and Adrian Shaw's style of arguing, they would be laughed out of the room.

Sure, investigators speculate and theorize when they're musing about causes, but no recognized credible paranormal researcher would ever resort to possibilities to shore up the foundation of their evidence. Rabbitdawg September 15, at How much time would she have had if she actually gathered all that information normal means?

I mean it is not at all easy and VERY time consuming finding the right informants, talking to them etc. September 15, at Paul September 15, at Very good points about the lack of time. Poole's body was discovered on Sunday. The murder became general knowledge among the locals on Monday. Holohan talked to the police on Wednesday.

So she would have had only about 48 hours to gather all this info from various sources including, it would seem, the killer himself! And she could not have gone about collecting info in any obvious way, such as approaching Poole's friends and family; such behavior would have been noticed and remembered. She would have had to do it on the sly - presumably while holding down her regular job. Michael Prescott September 16, at And that would be impossible!

I am a lawyer by profession so I am trained in gathering a good amount of various information in a short amount of time. Even though I currently have an occupation that does not involve talking to witnesses I spent the obligatory time at a prosecutor and was at court while I was trained and I know first hand how incredibly time consuming it is to get information from "human sources" talking to witnesses. For one witness who proves a good source of information you have two spent hours on interviewing people who in fact cannot contribute anything!

And concerning other facts she knew it needs to be considered that this was before the internet! It is the same with very young kids talking about previous lives: As my eldest child is now 4 years old and fairly intelligent as are her friends I can attest that it is impossible for a kid the same age or even younger to invent a realistic or coherent story or to teach a kid that type of story.

That is beyond what a years old can do. But interestingly sceptics rather attribute capabilities to human beings they do not possess than accepting the paranormal September 16, at Bruce Siegel September 16, at The BBC has updated its cookie policy.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third party social media websites if you visit a page which contains embedded content from social media.

Such third party cookies may track your use of the BBC website. We and our partners also use cookies to ensure we show you advertising that is relevant to you. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the BBC website.

However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. These are external links and will open in a new window. A child killer who became the first person in the world to be convicted using DNA evidence has been refused parole - but recommended for transfer to an open prison.

Colin Pitchfork was given a life sentence in for the rape and murder of year-old Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire. We are unable to comment further on the details of this case.

The couple decided Scully-Hicks would stay at home while Craig continued to work as a company director with frequent trips away overnight. The trial heard social workers visited the family fortnightly as the baby settled into her new family and she was described as a "happy, smiley child". But in text messages sent by the killer, he said he was "struggling to cope" when caring for Elsie - describing her as "Satan in a babygro" while neighbours reported hearing him swearing at the infant and repeatedly telling the crying child to "shut up".

On each occasion Elsie suffered injuries, the killer's husband was away with work, they were reported as domestic accidents and health visitors did not raise any concerns. Saudi Arabia says it intercepted the ballistic missile fired towards the capital by the Houthis. Continue Change settings Find out more.

More on this story. Dad jailed for life for murder. Dad of adopted baby guilty of murder. Murdered by adopted father. Top Stories Yemen rebels fire missile at Riyadh Saudi Arabia says it intercepted the ballistic missile fired towards the capital by the Houthis. Why you can trust BBC News. When asked by Adrian Shaw, D. The pullover played no part and even if it did it was not due to anything Holohan had said. These three elements were vital to combat potential and actual defences, which I believe would have raised sufficient doubt as to lead to a Not Guilty verdict.

This echoes a comment Batters made in It is hard to reconcile those different views. Either the incriminating DNA was taken from Ruark's pullover, or it was taken from Poole's fingernails. But it is interesting to notice the rather ambiguous nature of Youens' sentence: It sounds as if he is backtracking from his first statement even before the sentence has ended.

And it is unclear how "the pullover played no part" if Lundy "does recall 'fibres' being mentioned at the trial. In this respect, Youens' essay raises more questions than it answers. A BBC article on the case, which doesn't mention Holohan or mediumship, reports that the conviction was obtained by DNA-testing semen left on an article of Poole's clothing found at the murder scene. If this is accurate, it undercuts the claim that the pullover found in Ruark's trash, not at the crime scene was the crucial piece of evidence, although it also undercuts Youens' contention that the evidence was obtained from "the victim's fingernails.

For one thing, it identifies Ruark as Poole's lover, when according to the other accounts I've read, he was merely a friend of Poole's ex-husband and someone she did not like or trust. Since the BBC article does not go into detail and does not identify the item of clothing in question, and since it states that Poole's body was found "semi-naked," I'm left wondering if the pullover in question perhaps belonged to her, and Ruark took it with him and disposed of it in his trash because it was stained with his semen.

If this is true -- I stress if , because I don't know -- then the pullover was indeed the critical piece of evidence. It seems odd that there should be disagreement over such a seemingly basic fact of the case, but there it is. Incidentally the BBC piece also states that Poole, after being beaten and raped, was "strangled with the cord from a bathroom light," though her body was found in the living room. If true, this further substantiates Holohan's claim that the attack began or at least partly took place in the bathroom, a fact that had not been reported in the press at the time.

Youens also argues that Ruark was already a suspect in the case, and Holohan could have known this from local gossip. It is true that Ruark had voluntarily gone to the police after they asked anyone who'd known Poole to come forward. According to Batters and Smith, he was not considered a serious suspect because he had no history of violence; of the roughly 30 suspects, they say, Ruark was nowhere near the top of the list.

On the other hand, in a letter reproduced on Tony Youens' website, supervising detective Tony Lundy says that Ruark emerged as his top suspect. Montague Keen, for his part, wrote in a separate piece that, "Ruark had already given the police a persuasive alibi.

He was no longer a suspect when Holohan was interviewed. Without more inforrmation, it's impossible to say who's right. Youens attributes the rest of Holohan's accurate statements to "cold reading. Nor is cold reading a likely explanation for the psychometry test that Holohan used on Andrew Smith in order to prove her abilities.

Playfair and Keen write:. She said he [Smith] had recently received a letter about essential electrical work, as indeed he had, from a Building Society telling him that he would have to get the house he hoped to buy rewired if he wanted a mortgage.

She said he was about to be transferred to another station, which he thought very unlikely — until he was informed of his pending transfer only days later. Firstly, however, she made a remark which must have been unnervingly accurate. Batters told us that "to my dying day I could not disclose what she said. It was quite extraordinary with detail. Since Smith himself did not know he was about to be transferred, he could hardly have conveyed this information to Holohan through body language or other giveaways, as required by cold reading.

Unfortunately, as the above quote indicates, some of the most convincing evidence in the case has not been made public. It would be interesting to know the first item that Holohan relayed to Smith. It would be even more interesting to know the many specific details that she recounted about the murder itself. According to Playfair and Keen, her description of the murder was extremely graphic and as best anyone can determine through scientific reconstruction of the crime factually accurate down to the smallest detail.

Yet, out of respect for the family's sensibilities, the investigators withheld this information from the Journal article. Obviously, the case would be further strengthened if these details could be published. As far as I am aware the investigation carried out by Keen and Playfair never included the questioning of the two most senior and highly respected detectives involved. A serious omission surely? Still I'm certain he interviewed the medium herself with the typical thoroughness we've come to expect of an SPR investigator.

But in their article, Playfair and Keen note that Lundy, at least, is "now retired and, we were informed, not available for interview. There is no mention of McKinlay, but given his apparent antipathy to the idea that Holohan contributed anything of value to the case, it is certainly possible that he also refused to talk.

By the same token, some people would not talk to Youens and his associate: Tony Batters very kindly supplied me with a copy of his notes along with how they related to the crime. We exchanged numerous emails … Adrian Shaw spoke to Detective Chief Inspector Norman McKinlay as well as the detective who originally took Ruark in for questioning and also retrieved the pullover from his dustbin.

Lundy was the officer in charge of the original investigation and McKinlay dealt with the re-investigation. We did contact other officers who either did not wish to discuss the case or never returned our calls. If it's slipshod of the SPR investigators not to get through to Lundy and McKinlay, isn't it equally slipshod of Youens and Shaw not to get through to anyone other than Batters, Lundy, McKinlay, and an unnamed detective?

There is no indication that they spoke to Holohan, Smith, or Jacqui Poole's relatives, for instance. They even signed affidavits attesting to the accuracy of the resulting article. Playfair and Keen report:. As Batters has repeatedly told us, the only possible single source for all the information [provided by Holohan] is Jacqueline Poole … Tony Batters stated that "I've accepted the fact that Jacqui communicated with Christine," as, he has told us, have all his police colleagues with whom he has discussed the case.

Alternatively, you can read the article by subscribing to the Lexscien database , which maintains the SPR's archive. Lexscien charges a fee, but there is a workaround: The seven-day trial does not allow you to download the full article for offline reading or printout.

There's a book on the Jacqui Poole case: I've ordered a copy. Perhaps it will shed further light on some of the loose ends mentioned in the post. If paranormal investigator's presented a case for the validity of mediumship, NDE's or psi using Tony Youens and Adrian Shaw's style of arguing, they would be laughed out of the room. Sure, investigators speculate and theorize when they're musing about causes, but no recognized credible paranormal researcher would ever resort to possibilities to shore up the foundation of their evidence.

Rabbitdawg September 15, at How much time would she have had if she actually gathered all that information normal means? I mean it is not at all easy and VERY time consuming finding the right informants, talking to them etc. September 15, at Paul September 15, at Very good points about the lack of time. Poole's body was discovered on Sunday. The murder became general knowledge among the locals on Monday. Holohan talked to the police on Wednesday.

So she would have had only about 48 hours to gather all this info from various sources including, it would seem, the killer himself! And she could not have gone about collecting info in any obvious way, such as approaching Poole's friends and family; such behavior would have been noticed and remembered. She would have had to do it on the sly - presumably while holding down her regular job. Michael Prescott September 16, at And that would be impossible! I am a lawyer by profession so I am trained in gathering a good amount of various information in a short amount of time.

Even though I currently have an occupation that does not involve talking to witnesses I spent the obligatory time at a prosecutor and was at court while I was trained and I know first hand how incredibly time consuming it is to get information from "human sources" talking to witnesses. For one witness who proves a good source of information you have two spent hours on interviewing people who in fact cannot contribute anything!

And concerning other facts she knew it needs to be considered that this was before the internet! It is the same with very young kids talking about previous lives: As my eldest child is now 4 years old and fairly intelligent as are her friends I can attest that it is impossible for a kid the same age or even younger to invent a realistic or coherent story or to teach a kid that type of story. That is beyond what a years old can do. But interestingly sceptics rather attribute capabilities to human beings they do not possess than accepting the paranormal September 16, at Bruce Siegel September 16, at This one reminds me of a very similar case in Chicago that made headlines in the late seventies.

Teresita Basa, a nurse working in Evanston, was also found murdered in her apartment. Later, she appeared to, and spoke thru, a coworker, naming her killer and giving specific details. Detectives followed up and were able to get a confession from the named suspect. While not proving survival, these cases certainly add to the case for life after death. It is interesting, that the people who are brave enough to step forward, are immediately accused of fraud or lies. In the Basa case, the coworker, married to a Doctor, had much to lose in telling her paranormal story.

If she had heard things or had suspicions, why not just say it? Why make up the paranormal aspect? Maybe because that is the way these things actually happen. Greg L September 16, at Teresita Basa was one of my very favorite Unsolved segments! Too bad the links no longer work; I'd love to watch it again.

Ginny September 16, at Those of a certain age may remember the case of the kidnap and murder in the s of the former Italian prime minister, and at the time president of the Christian Democrats, Aldo Moro at the hands of the Red Brigade. I stumbled on a reference to the following in a footnote on Wikipedia. The full story is in the Independent article linked below but here are the key facts:.

During the 55 days he was held in captivity everyone in Italy desperately speculated where the kidnappers could possibly be keeping Aldo Moro.

At one point something extraordinary happened. Romano Prodi, himself later prime minister and also president of the European Commission, went to the police with a remarkable tip off. He reported how he and a group of university academic friends had spent a Sunday afternoon attempting a seance with a Ouija board. They appeared to get responses from what was identified as the spirit of another, recently deceased, senior Christian Democrat called Giorgio La Pira.

Having established this they asked what everyone wanted to know "where are they holding Aldo Moro? The Ouija spelled out in turn 3 place names.. The first two were instantly identified as known places, but Gradoli meant nothing to anyone. Until that is they located a village of that name in an Atlas, to their own apparently great surprise. This fact - that a place that existed but no one had heard of had turned up in response to their question - prompted Prodi to risk ridicule and inform the police.

The village of Gradoli was duly raided and searched and The lead seemed another dead end. After Moro was murdered and his body disposed of it was determined that he had been kept during most of his captivity in an apartment in a street in Rome called The gist of the Independent article is that Prodi's political opponents, skeptics and the public at large take it virtually as read that he "obviously" made the whole seance "nonsense" up to cover up for someone..

But from the report I can't find any suggestion of evidence that this is the case Lawrence B September 16, at Paul September 16, at Matt Rouge September 16, at I know another case similar to this case and the case of Teresita Basa, the case of Giuseppe Veraldi:. Juan September 17, at According to the skeptiko forums at least, there seems to be a group of fringe materialists suggesting that psi-like effects can be explained by de-coupling the idea of time's linearity from classical physics.

Of course, one could set such an attempted explanation in the same camp as super psi if one wanted. Joshua Cearley September 18, at Hey, it all starts with recognizing that the phenomena exist.

If they recognize that psi, the Afterlife, etc. Matt Rouge September 18, at Matt,I had an interesting experience with this once. I went to Paris with a friend, and we walked all over the city for six days. One day by accident we came to this plaza - neither of us had any idea what it was about and no one was around.

I had the strangest feeling there - I suddenly felt very very cold and I'm usually much warmer than those around me and had an intense feeling of loneliness and despair.

I was having a fantastic time in Paris and had no idea why I felt this way. My friend reported similar feelings. That night my friend found out where we had been. It was the Place de Concorde, where thousands of people had been guillotined during the French Revolution. I knew of course about the guillotine, but I had no idea where the massacres actually occurred in Paris, and even if I had seen the name, "Place de Concorde," I never connected the two.

Was this a glitch in time,or was it the cliche of people's feelings "imprinting" on a location? Kathleen September 19, at Michael Prescott's Blog Occasional thoughts on matters of life and death.

Recent Posts Miscellaneous musings of meager merit Book Review: The Survival of the Soul Apropos of nothing

Todays Winners

Frequently asked questions

Why web-based e-mail marketing firm deliver your newsletters?

Relax, Drink and Enjoy. The Tomatometer rating — based on the published opinions of hundreds of film and television critics — is a trusted measurement of movie and TV programming quality for millions of moviegoers. The Last Jedi Cast. The two performers were inspired. What is Murder For Two Like?

Why don’t sat there and thought?

Rock of Ages Assoc. Many thanks to them for keeping the holidays wacky, and Merry Christmas to all of you! Cases and Materials , the first and only law school textbook devoted to theatre law, and a regular contributor to the theatre volumes of Entertainment Industry Contracts , published by LexisNexis. View All Audience Reviews. Boston Conservatory at Berklee Performing arts. Can't wait to spread hilarity in the Pacific Northwest! Joe Kinosian and Brett Ryback.