Re: st: String variable behaving badly

Oh my goodness thank you so much!
Anna
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> wrote:
> In problems like this I suspect the presence of non-standard
> characters, say characters that look like spaces but aren't, or
> unprintable characters.
>
> I wrote -charlist- (SSC) as a utility which yields a listing of
> distinct characters present in a string variable.
>
> . charlist var1
> CEGaeglnovwy
>
> . ret li
>
> macros:
> r(chars) : " CEGaeglnovwy "
> r(sepchars) : " C E G a e g l n o v w y "
> r(ascii) : "32 67 69 71 97 101 103 108 110 111 118 119 121 160 "
>
> The tell-tale detail (better seen in the saved results) is the
> presence of char(160). Replace those characters by regular spaces
>
> . replace var1 = subinstr(var1, char(160), " ", .)
>
> and the multiple personae of Ms Cawley collapse into one.
>
> (I'd score very low on a sports quiz but I do remember her as a tennis player.)
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Anna Reimondos <areimondos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Statalist
>>
>> I am currently cleaning a survey dataset with a variety of numeric as
>> well as string variables. I recently discovered some very odd
>> behaviour with one of the string variables.
>>
>> An extract of the data containing two variables (an ID variable and
>> the problematic string variable) is available here:
>>
>> http://wikisend.com/download/508418/stringdata.dta
>>
>> In the dataset are the 23 responses from people who answered a
>> question about who they believe is the most influential sports person
>> in Australia. All these 23 people answered the same thing 'Evonne
>> Goolagong Cawley' (a famous sports lady).
>>
>> The problem is that when I do a simple tab of the variable there are
>> two entries for Evonne Goolagong Cawley instead of just one. I don't
>> understand what is happening. In the dataset you can see that the
>> first 2 respondents are somehow being identified as having a different
>> answer to the rest of the people even though the spelling is exactly
>> the same. I have tried trimming the data, triple checking the spelling
>> and so on, but can't get to the bottom of this and it is driving me
>> up the wall.
>>
>> Just for reference this 'issue' is affecting other entries as well,
>> where what I think looks like exactly the same response is not
>> recognised as such.
>> Any help would be much appreciated.
>>
>> I am using Stata 12.1
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/