I'm far from being a Clinton-fan, both of them are power hungry assholes.

That being said, I'd still much prefer that the nuclear weapon launch codes are in the hands of Clinton and her backing forces. At least she appears to be somewhat sane and her ideas grounded on reality. She also haven't said that dropping a nuclear bomb on Europe would be possible. Unlike Trump.

EDIT: I'm not going to continue on this topic further, I come here to "disconnect" myself from the unpleasant aspects of real life, talking politics is not really helping with that.

Although not all that reliable since it comes from right wing author before important elections. Certainly the documentary has an agenda and is rather one note journalism... For example when they speak of Rwanda dictator they forget to mention that Clintons are not the only ones who have praised him and also that in African country after "civil war" getting a leader like him is almost a victory for democracy, considering the other possible options...

I suspect parts of it is true though. I know I can always trust you Alex to keep me updated on stuff like this.

True or not, the options for US election are what they are... and I'm certain that Clinton will do a much better job than the psycho clown... no offence to Trump voters.

“Don’t worry about that baby. I love babies,” Mr. Trump said. “I hear that baby crying, I like it. What a baby, what a beautiful baby. Don’t worry, don’t worry.”

But Mr. Trump’s pacifying platitudes did nothing to comfort the howling infant, whose persistent wails seemed to be getting on the candidate’s nerves.

“Actually, I was only kidding, you can get that baby out of here,” Mr. Trump said a few beats later with a slight smirk as laughs and a few gasps escaped from the crowd. “Don’t worry, I think she really believed me that I love having a baby crying while I’m speaking. That’s O.K. People don’t understand. That’s O.K.”

Have to admit, this made me laugh. Reminds me of that Seinfeld-episode where George decides to do always opposite of what is expected and everything begins to go his way.

Of course his campaign claims that he didn't - but I think he likely did since he has said a few times that nuclear weapons are not off the table. Hell, he even said that using nukes in Europe is not off the table (video above). Crazy, crazy stuff.

That's not something Hillary would ever utter. If she would, she would say something like "I supported bringing the resolution to Kosovo by using air strikes"... instead of talking like a 4th grader.
Indeed, googling this statement reveals that it is not quoted on any remotely legit source. If she had said that - it would be on mainstream media as well. As for Kosovo; air strikes actually worked and ended the ethnic cleansing.

As for Clinton being supported by some neocons, that's apparently true although I haven't really bothered to check it myself... It is logical: they would be against Trump for the exact same reason Putin supports Trump. The reason being that Trump would weaken the US and would not be able to gather international support behind his actions. I have no doubt Trump would be just as big or bigger a warmonger as Clinton, but he simply would be poor at execution and doesn't understand politics behind the conflicts at all.

As for Clinton being more dangerous, you must be kidding...

With Trump, we're talking about narcissistic thin skinned loose cannon bully who takes no advice from anyone... while telling us that nuclear option is not off the table.

Speaking of which, HERE is btw rather interesting article about nuclear weapons. Some rather close calls in the past.

Some of these warheads can be launched within minutes of the president’s order, hit anywhere in the world within a half hour, and deliver 20 times the explosive force of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. The president can order this without consulting Congress, without being checked by the Supreme Court.

“One man, the president, is responsible. He makes an error and, who knows, it’s Armageddon.”