So then, the wires & the coils have to be sized for maximum load of 75 amps at 120 Vrms, & therefore they have to be thick. Not 2 ways about it (the ones that feed the appliance). They have to be thicker than your standard home wiring, so that it can handle the “75 amps.” Now, you then can connect whatever you want to it provided it’s a 110-120 appliance. For example, a standard power-strip is rated at 15A – 125V AC (rms).

Ok, from what you described, you said there were multiple coils w/in coils. How many? How far away from each other? Were they all of the same “height”, or were there any towards the center that were “taller” & like a cylinder? Just curious… I hope you are Ok, bud !!!

NOTE: Hey, this is the weirdest shit, all of the sudden I could not get through the site, specially when trying to answer back to you. I could still navigate the Internet, but for some odd reason I couldn’t get through to the “club”… And I don’t think it was the “server,” because I could “ping” it, I saw some people posted, but I couldn’t get through. I was practically “crawling.”

8-)

ClubConspiracy DOS Attack ??? :-o :-o :-o

truebeliever, when I first joined the club, I don’t remember exactly, but for some reason I had to communicate w/ them, & it seemed as though it was probably just 1 person answering my e-mails. They were very friendly & helpful. They thanked me for my posts, encouraged you to post some more. Some time after that I needed some help, & I had sent them my questions the same way as before, via e-mail, but then I never received an answer. I know they probably got busy, but I tried several times, & then I just gave up, after a few times w/o getting anything back.

Do they have a phone number ???

Anyhow, regarding the 75 amps, I guess this unit he was describing is supposed to provide power for an entire home, so 75 amps might not be enough for an entire house. My breaker panel, I just looked, carries a total of 360 amps, so… yeah, chances are I am not pulling that much all of the time, but it’s just the capacity that it could handle under a complete maximum load. As far as the resistance is concerned, a thick cable has actually less resistance than a thinner cable. Just like in speaker wires. If they are thicker you waste less energy in the cable run, because the current flows much easier over additional surface area, & thus it’s better. If you use instead thinner & longer cable runs, then because of the added resistance (to current flow) in the wire, you’ll loose some energy in the cable itself, as what is called, IR losses (I x I x R).

I’m tired, I’m retiring… see ya’

8-)

Zero Point Energy Transfer – :-o :-o :-o

Well, all I’m saying is that 75 amps is a lot of amperage. A single circuit breaker is typically up to 40 amps. For example, my “range” is in an “80” amp circuit (2 “40” amp breakers), & my “A/C” is in a “60” amp circuit (2 “30” amp breakers), just to give you an idea. Are the wires solid “copper or aluminum”?, or are they “stranded” wire (a bunch of finer solid wires stranded together as in a “rope” fashion)?

If I come across a circuit in the Internet I’ll definitely bring it up, but I doubt they are going to show it. I’d suggest to just, take a good look w/ you eyes & mind, & look for details such as, are they donut shaped?, rounded or square like?, materials used?, how many?, is the center coil also surrounded by loops of fine wire?, how many total coils, 2, or 3, or more?, how many loops of wire around each coil?, how far apart are the coils from each other?, sizes?, weight?, etc., & if you can cut 1 of them in half, then you can see what’s inside. Is it solid metal?, or hollow?, is it solid or made out of adjacent “thin plates”?, Does it have a “dialectric” (sort of like an insulating material between conductors) of any kind?, are there any sharp edged or thin metal looking devices anywhere?, such as antennas?, or waveguides (high frequency antennas)?, is there an “on/off” switch?, or is it “on” all the time?, does it heat up under load (when connected to an appliance)?, & if there is any other weird looking shit, be able to describe it, etc., etc.,…

Feel free to drop me a line…

8-)

Zero-Point (Free) Energy Devices – :-o :-o :-o

I concur w/ you guys here as far as utilizing each thread, & therefore keeping its topic, pure or honest to the discussion at hand. Discussing any other topic in any thread is “disrespectful” to the rest of us. If they want to drift, they should do it in their own thread. Anyhow, w/ that said, I included some interesting stuff about Tesla, not that we didn’t already know, but just to continue to expand on his accomplishments, & in an easy to find format.

Re: The Most Hated Scientist of the New World Order – Post #42Nikola Tesla & Free-Energy Extraction
http://www.clubconspiracy.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=277&start=40

8-)

truebeliever, Not at all. That was only meant for the blurp in astrophysics, by the person that talks about the earth is not moving. For example, we were talking about a free-energy devices & he posts a blurp in Astrophysics. Yeah, granted this post might have a slight relevance, but at the time it seemed completely out of context. Not only that, his posts states,

Quote:

“Electrodynamic forces in electric plasmas are much stronger than the gravitational force. Mainstream astrophysicists are continually “surprised” by new data sent back by space probes and orbiting telescopes”

which completely contradicts his idea, since as we all know, rockets are launched w/ the help of the earth rotation. And that’s it. I really don’t care to go any further than that…

I haven’t read any of the recent posts here, but from a quick glance, it looks like I caused a stir, which was, honestly, not my intent at all. I thought we were all in the same wavelength. I apologize for the confusion, but I didn’t want to make a direct attack on anyone. I hope you guys don’t take it too seriously, since we are not really solving anything here, we were just talking about a particular topic, about free-energy-devices. Now whether they are powered from man-made electro-magnetic-radiation, a zero-point source, electro-magnetic-plasma, the earth electro-magnetic-field, the sun-rays, the wind, a fart, or the ether, is not relevant. We were just trying to see, I thought, to see if we could somehow accidentally run into some simple free-energy-source we could all use. That’s all… so, I certainly hope you all come back, nomad, & continue discussing,… Let’s forget about the stir, really, let’s be friends & move on.
8-)

Tesla's suite at the hotel New Yorker following his funeral on January 12, 1943. Left to right: Bogoljub Jevtic, a member of the last Royal Government of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia; Professor Boris Furlan, a Slovene active during the war in the United States, who went back to Yugoslavia where he was arrested and liquidated brutally; Sava Kosanovic, Tesla's nephew and member of the Royal Government in exile.

I think nomad was right in that Tesla was the one who first used available free-energy, to power his coil. If you look into these links,

Re: The Most Hated Scientist of the New World Order – Post #42Nikola Tesla & Free-Energy Extraction
http://www.clubconspiracy.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=277&start=40

You’ll see that his basic Tesla Coil circuit works by harnessing “resonant energy” in his “primary coil”, via the “interrupter” circuit, which he uses to ramp up the frequency of the “primary” to match the “resonant frequency” of the “secondary coil” circuit. Then once this “resonant frequency” is achieved, all he has to do is keep pulsating the “primary coil” just at the right time, to “reinforce the oscillation of the “secondary” at “just that right moment” at the “end of a cycle.” In this resonant condition the oscillations can be made to swing up to tremendous values”. Sounds simple, doesn't it?

I hear you nomad, I hear ya',... & I'm there brother ! I believe, & now I'm certain that Tesla had it. The fact that there are zero-point-energy harnessing devices' patents proves, to anyone who doesn't understand, the fact that it can be done. It is being done. You saw it, & I've heard also stories from retired ex-airforce guys about super efficient gasoline engines 40 or more years ago. So, there. But who's got a patent on "nature", but God.

8-)

Fluorescent Lights Flicker ??? :-o :-o :-o

If you turn the light switch in any room, ON & then OFF in 1 second ( ½ secondON & the other ½ secondOFF, as in an even cycle) that translates into 1 cycle per second, or

1 cycle / second = 1 Hertz

By the way the ON part & the OFF part of the cycle don’t have to be even, meaning it could be let’s say 100 millisecondsON, & 900 millisecondsOFF. That’s the same as 100/1000 secondsON, & 900/1000 secondsOFF. Ok, this is just how the math works.

Now, the fact that this kid notices the 60Hz (Hertz) ”flicker”, means that his brain is running so fast that he can actually notice when the AC (alternating current), that is “exiting” this light-bulb, is for that part of the cycle that is OFF, or exactly at “0 Volts rms”, & thus the lights are, for just a fraction of a second, OFF. However, because we are saying that we have 60 cycles per second, we actually have the lights go OFF60 times in 1 second, which is a lot of ON/OFF cycles for most of us to notice. But like I said, this kid is responsive or aroused, by this ”flicker”. In reality because the AC current is a ”sine wave”, this zero (0) point occurs 2 times in the ”sine wave”, 1 time at 0 “degress”, & another time at 180 “degress” (1 full cycle for a “sine wave” being 360 “degrees”). So instead of 60OFF times in 1 second, we can say for all practical purposes, that at 60Hz the light goes OFF120 times in 1 second. The total duration of this OFF time in 1 second, we could approximate it to be 2/360 = 0.0055555 seconds, or 5.55 milliseconds, but ½ of that for each individual OFF time w/in the second, or for 2.77 milliseconds, every time the light goes momentarilyOFF. If you don’t know what a ”sine wave” looks like, look in any pre-algebra, trigonometry, or calculus, or physics book, & look for a “sine wave”.

Now the other part of this is the fact that they have done experiments in which it has been shown that some people, & I’m pretty sure there is at least a certain percentage of the population of people, for which their brains respond negatively to ”flicker”, & sometimes they either have epileptic attacks, &/or they have convulsions ( http://www.hyperdictionary.com/search.aspx?define=convulsion ). Some times it happens to kids, of any age, when they are watching TV. They have some epileptic attack & then the parents have to seek for some medical help. However, the problem was introduced by the TV, which when displaying horizontal “traces” on the screen, causes the same effect, as what is called ”flicker”, however, like I said, most of us do not notice & are not negatively affected by this phenomenon.

In addition to these experiments, they have done the same type of thing, but now the scenario changes & the experiment involves, questioning a suspect in a dark room, w/ 1 light bulb for many hours, up to the point of mental & physical exhaustion. Now when the suspect is under “stress”, then they add flickering lights, & the whole thing changes. So, making a long story short, they have experimented w/ ”flicker”, or ”blinking” lights, & the effects they have on “stressed out” suspects, as when they do when they “torture” people.

They use the 3-phase configuration as a distribution mechanism, meaning the “power grid” that carries the high-voltage power around the country, to streets, & to your neighborhood, is a 3-phase distribution system. Look at the power poles down the street & you’ll see 3-cables. Between any 2 of these cables there is a sine-wave, so there is a total of 3 sine waves, & thus a 3-phase distribution. The reason being is for the efficiency of sharing the “medium” (cables) & therefore carrying more power w/ less cable. The higher voltage also reduces the amount of current required to distribute the same amount of power, since P=VI, if you increase the voltage, you can transfer the same amount of power w/ less current. It’s just math. However, once they create a branch off the grid into your home via a step down transformer, to convert the high-voltage coming from the grid to a lower voltage required by the home, then you only have 2 wires & 1-phase or sine wave. If you want to prove this all you need to do is connect an oscilloscope to an AC receptacle in your house & look at the wave form it displays on the scope. It should look like a sine wave coming from 0 (zero) to a peak of approximately 124V rms times the square root of 2 = 175.36 V_peak. You can measure the AC voltage w/ a muli-meter & it should read around somewhere around 120. Mine read 124, which means that, that is the r.m.s voltage or the (root mean square) voltage, which is approximately the average effective voltage level of that sine wave. So to get the peak voltage you need to multiply times the square root of 2. That’s just the math of a sine wave. They explain that in any electronics-1 class.

Now if you go into the site where that picture came from, & do a search for 3-phase, they show that some ships have 3-phase wiring, but all of the wires are “hot”, where as in a standard home, 2 wires carry 1 sine wave, & the 3rd wire is just the “earth ground” or “chassis ground”, which is literally connected to either the “ground or a pipe” stuck on the ground (which is just a protection mechanism so that current can flow to the ground if someone accidentally causes a “short circuit” between a “hot” wire & either the chassis of an electronic equipment, appliance, or any metal parts of a home or dwelling. 3-phase systems are more “efficient” as far as transporting power, just as it is in the case of power grids, however, most homes are single phase.

As far as the flicker-less bulbs, it’s possible to suppress that 0 (zero) point voltage w/ a couple of diodes, such that the voltage never goes negative & stays on the upper or positive side of the cycle, or perhaps w/ a capacitor circuit that discharges whenever the sine wave is making the zero cross transition, so that the light never goes out. However, due to the extra cost, & other issues, such as power factor, I doubt anyone would bother. I could be wrong. I don’t keep up w/ the electric power field.

8-)

Free-Energy Devices ??? – :-o :-o :-o

I agree w/ you. It’s either true, which there is no reason why it can’t, or it is a complete fabrication (bull-shit). By the way, I think that all words have a purpose, & it never bothers me when anyone uses them, except of course, those who use them so much, the words loose their effectiveness, not to mention the person looses the credibility of everyone around them.

The other thing is that, I would assume that if, as you had mentioned, there were some technicians & electricians there, I am sure they have seen devices that can clamp around (without touching) a power cable, & by the use of an inductive coil (built-in in the clamp itself) it can suck power directly out of the electro-magnetic field around the wire. Most power technicians have a similar unit, but it is designed to make measurements, of voltage, phase, etc.. So if they suspected for that to be the case, then I’m certain they would have mentioned it. So I wouldn’t rule this out yet, as fake or fraud.

Another thing is that, I might have jumped into the “ether” thing right off the bat, & because of the excitement of the news you brought, but in reality the “ether” is located at the end of matter, at the atomic level, & some people describe it as a cross-dimensional vortex into the “ether” & that is where all energy & thus matter emanates from. Our reality & everything in our world, including the sun, the moon, & the stars, & including the energy we can not see w/ our eyes, emanate from the ether. I can point out some links later in another post. However, some of these devices we are talking about here, like the patent I posted, (just read the very beginning of the patent) get energy by tuning-in (just like a radio) into a band in the high-frequency range of the spectrum, then w/ some tricks of physics & electricity they produce a lower beat-frequency component, which is easier to process, & then inject it into a circuit from which a current can be extracted. In other words, it’s like sucking energy right out of all the man-made electro-magnetic radiation that is already all around us. So the ether might not be the appropriate term in this case, & anyone who reads this stuff might automatically assume, that we are indeed pulling this stuff right our of our asses. Perhaps more appropriately, the term used in the patent is, “incident zero point electromagnetic radiation.” However, if you want to continue using the term, go ahead. I know what you are referring to. I'm not correcting you, I am just making that point clear.

Hey, not to change the subject, but I saw the movie “Downfall” http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=info&id=1808642134 , where it covers the last days of Hitler. Even though I admit, it is the darkest movie I’ve ever seen, I recommend anyone who believes in Freedom, to see this movie. Perhaps after seeing it, it should completely change our minds about the good old phrase, “follow the leader.” I am not kidding. You have to be not only insane, but you must not have any self respect, care for your fellow citizens & siblings, yourself, God, or anyone for that matter. Those people were in a literal Hell, only the most evilest beings could ever be proud of. However, the parallels are mind boggling. If you ever saw the movie “Shindler’s List” (1993) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108052 , I think this one not only complements the saga, but it’s a revelation, evil does exist & it hasn’t died yet.

I would concentrate, let’s say, on the simplest design of all, even if it is the smallest. Now the fact that the E.E. Professor can’t figure it out tells me, he is either not sharing his thoughts w/ the rest of you, or he is definitely perplexed, which is hard to swallow. I would expect more, an opinion, a simple theory,… something. How about the kid, has he explained, to any depth, how he sees this device operate?

Another thing is the fact that remember, by keeping a lid on this, in the end no one benefits. If anything happens to the kid, & the devices disappear, that’s the end of that,… what you saw is forever gone.

A picture is worth a thousand words…

8-)

Mind Programming ??? :-o :-o :-o

You don’t have to answer, but what I would be asking myself is, Why me? What is it that you have, they want? What do you think they were trying to program you to do? Or what memories where they trying to erase from your mind? Did you see the movie “The Manchurian Candidate?” ( http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&id=1808471891&cf=info ), if you didn’t, you might want to rent the DVD. It’s definitely about programming, erasing memories, etc. It might definitely help, although it might be disturbing to see. I think that in order to heal the psyche, you have to always be honest with yourself. That’s a start…

8-)

Free-Energy Devices – :-o :-o :-o

nomad, all wires exhibit the ability to create a magnetic field around the wire when current is flowing through it, in particular when exited w/ an AC voltage. You can think of a “coil” as a more powerful extension of the “wire” concept, one that concentrates & amplifies the strength of this current induced field, & into a magnetic field. So when an RL (of resistance & inductance) circuit gets connected to a DC source (i.e., a battery), it instantaneously creates a magnetic field around it which is going to collapse or decay over time, depending on the values of R & L selected. If the source is AC, then this magnetic field is going to remain there, & it’s going to also alternate. However, some of the energy (or power) going into the circuit from the AC receptacle is going remain in the magnetic-field, & some is going to be released as heat. The mathematics of these circuits are not obvious, & as you change values or R, & L, (i.e., resistance & inductance - for a resistor or light-bulb & coil or transformer) each circuit is going to behave differently. You can assume that a coil being exited w/ an AC voltage is going to have a magnetic field around it. However, the power contained in the circuit is all going to be “expensed” or “consumed”. The light bulb is going to generate both light & heat, a plane resistor is going to get hot & its purpose is to resist current flow & to generate a voltage “drop” across it, & the coils are going to concentrate a magnetic-field around themselves. However, when the "AC source" goes out, so does everything else,…

We could talk about this stuff for ever, but unfortunately, besides the fact that there are thousands of books written on the matter, we all think in the way we already understand these concepts. Unless provided w/ either a picture or an exact circuit description, &/or a wiring diagram w/ all component values, we are just going to be guessing what’s really going on. Wireless transmitters, & inductive circuits (coil circuits) are already a common place in our world. What we were looking for was a device that does not need any batteries – self powered. That’s the one you should take a picture off,… I know you can’t, but look, look really hard & take a picture w/ your mind.

“Superconductors” are a complete different animal.

8-)

Max wrote:
So I wrote up a response and had to step away for a bit and Jimbo beat me to the punch. Anyway here it is:

Nomad- you might need to be a bit more specific on this question. Still, per common-man physics teachings it is possible to charge anything with extra "power" by building up "static electricity" which is said to be just a build up of extra electrons. These extra electron built up must be "insulated" from other materials else, the electrons will flow to that area and you lose your "power". The idea is to wait until you want to power something and connect it to that and have the electrons flow-- this is what power is and is similar to a battery. As mentioned- our understanding of static electricity is potentially way off however.

When wire is coiled up and has current running threw it it results in an interesting phenomena known as inductance- where a magnetic field is produced inside the coil like this:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/imgmag/sol3.gif

This is actually how transformers work- with a concept of mutual inductance. In a transformer a magnetic field is generated in one coil from a current which produces a magnetic field- that magnetic field is then transformed into another coil which actually causes a current to be produced in the second wire. The number of wraps of wire of the two coils will effect the characteristics of the transformer. Say one coil has two times the number of wraps then there will be a 2x voltage factor between the two coils. So this is how there can be a drop of say 1,200 volts to 120 volts. That would be a 10x transformer. What's interesting is in the transformer there is a break in the wire- the two sides are not electrically connected at all- they are only connected by the magnetic field- here is a good pic, notice the different number of coil wraps:

This is why they call it electro-magnetic since the two forces are interconnected of which are all bound by Maxwell's Equations:

This is the foundation principles of electromagnetic waves such as TV and radio signals, visible light, infrared, x-rays, etc:

Superconductivity is another beast- basically a phenomena where a material has no electrical resistance to the flow of electrons. Normal wire heats up when you run power threw it because the lattice structure of the atoms in the wire are arranged in such a manner that the electrons following across them will have resistance against their flow and can "bounce back" some thus causing a loss of energy (and producing heat). In a superconductor the atoms are more structured (I believe, typically in more of a crystal form) and can hit a point where they have no measurable resistance at low temperatures. The problem is that the materials known to "modern science" all require some form of super cooling to achieve superconductivity and the materials are very brittle.

Here's an example of a resistance curve at low temperatures (0K is absolute 0- nothing can be "colder" since nothing moves at 0K).

The Meissner Effect is one of the interesting phenomena of superconductivity:

I've seen it with my own eyes.

Max wrote:
Jimbo- I agree with you that this is obviously all well know but not everyone here has the same background so helping to fill in some blanks for others won't hurt.

I've always been fascinated with these topics and phenomena and can see how there may be more here than meets the eye. This Nexus article http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/freeenergy.html has an interesting quote: "The common feature connecting all of these discoveries is that they use a small amount of one form of energy to control or release a large amount of a different kind of energy."

Applying various principles of resonant frequency, inductance & other electro-magnetic and superconductivity I can see how it may be possible for some seed energy to be magnified. Obviously I have no idea how at this point but the foundation looks solid for an investment of time considering the claims involved.

Free-Energy Devices – :-o :-o :-o

Max, I agree & I think we are trying to help as much as possible. However, I am suggesting to focus on the free-energy device. Transmitters, although a mystery to most people, do exist, & “most” are not trivial to design, except for perhaps some for the most basic applications. They only become trivial to those who have taken the time to analyze & design a few on their own. There are hundreds of transmitter circuits for many applications, & each one is designed for a particular frequency of operation, or frequency range. For example, the remote control of your TV, a wireless microphone, wireless electric guitar transmitter, AM radio, FM radio, digital satellite transmission, cell-phones, amateur radios, etc.,… & the list goes on.

Yes, the basic concepts do always apply, but realistically, in order for anyone to design a transmitter & explain its operation, you’d better know at least some electronics’ circuit theory. The second you start adding coils & capacitances, to a circuit composed of just batteries & resistors, the whole thing gets beyond the ability of most people w/o knowledge mathematics all the way up to at least a minimum of, pre-calculus. Otherwise you are just playing w/ the components. You have to understand complex numbers, exponents, exponential curves, derivatives, & integrals, in order to just analyze the response of a basic circuit. The analysis is not trivial, & now a days w/o the help of circuit analysis software, you can’t get too far.

Now, if you are just talking about 60 Hz power, then a technician w/ enough field experience could perhaps build certain circuits & systems composed of cables, voltage sources, motors, transformers, & power lines, w/o needing to solve complex equations, but that’s just because he/her is just putting together a circuit which was already thought of & designed by an engineer, & often times, since like I said, we are talking about 60 Hz power circuits, a lot of the system components begin to repeat themselves. However, that is not the proper way to go about designing electronic equipment & systems. In addition, everything involved in the whole gamut of power distribution systems is by no means trivial in any way shape or form.

Everyone should read the bottom of the article you posted,

Where In The World Is All The Free Energy?
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/freeenergy.html

& start by reading the last section “THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A JUST SOCIETY”.

8-)

Sources Of Free-Energy – :-o :-o :-o

nomad, I mentioned in a previous post about that, & I called it, “man-made electromagnetic radiation”. That includes all the ones you mentioned. Modern technology is well aware of these & all sources. I believe the “zero-point-energy” space is way above our spectrum of frequencies. The problem w/ extracting energy from our own man-made transmissions, as for example, sucking FM radio waves, is that, knowingly tapping into broadcast radio emissions, for the purpose of extracting “free-energy”, I would assume that, would certainly be in violation of some FFC rules. Therefore, I would assume for it to be illegal to extract energy from that medium. That would be comparable to tapping into your local water-utilities reservoir, so that you don’t have to pay them a water bill. Not exactly, but you get the picture. If that’s where the wiz-kid is piercing into, it is probably not a good idea…

8-)

Free-Energy Is All Around Us – :-o :-o :-o

Interesting observation there nomad. Yes, both the power’s & the radio channel-carrier’s are all sine waves. What separates one from the other, is basically each having its own “frequency” (of resonance – in this case, the “natural frequency” at which they oscillate). Power here in America, being a 60Hz wave & the AM radio band starts somewhere around 500-1600Khz (Kilo Hertz), while FM is in the 75-110 MHz range.

Tesla also demonstrated that the actual “earth” can be used as an electrical “ground plane” when transmitting wire-less power, since the entire “earth’s system” is electro-magnetic in nature, the “earth” being the perfect “ground”.

The magnetic needle moves, because it’s own internal magnetic alignment of its atoms has the same orientation as that of the lines of the magnetic-force field that permeates about the earth. I don’t know if you are familiar w/ the experiment where you pass a DC current through a wire which you also loop around a cylindrical object, like a plain old screw-driver, & then because of the magnetic-field created by the moving current around each loop of wire is pointing in the same direction & it is also perpendicular to the current flow. Then, this field concentrates inside the loop & along the entire length of the section of screw-driver under loops of wire. Now you have just created a magnetic screw-driver. If you attempt this, make sure you also include a light-bulb inline w/ the battery & the coil. If you disconnect the battery, the field collapses, & the temporary magnetization of that metal object begin to decay or die down, once the atoms inside start vibrating against each other & align in their normal fashion (for that “element”). Natural magnets have been magnetized by the earth’s magnetic field & because of the atomic structure of their “element” composition. Magnetic screw-drivers are most likely artificially magnetized electrically, & so would be the needle of the compass.

Now, the natural question evolving, might be, well if the magnetic field “induced” by the unidirectional current-flow around, what in this case is, a cylindrical object, is created by “current flow”, then where is the “current flow” that creates the “earth’s magnetic-field” coming from. Well, if you read “David Wilcock”, he explains it, he takes you all the way down to the atoms & the vortexes of energy out of which they emanate from, right out of the “aether” (also “ether”). Read this in ch03 where it talks about the platonic solids (& how this reality & matter is created out of vibrations of energy). He also explains how the planets are also emanations of energy from the ether, & therefore receive their (invisible) energy from there.

“A system is disclosed for converting high frequency zero point electromagnetic radiation energy to electrical energy. The system includes a pair of dielectric structures which are positioned proximal to each other and which receive incident zero point electromagnetic radiation. The volumetric sizes of the structures are selected so that they resonate at a frequency of the incident radiation. The volumetric sizes of the structures are also slightly different so that the secondary radiation emitted therefrom at resonance interfere with each other producing a beat frequency radiation which is at a much lower frequency than that of the incident radiation and which is amenable to conversion to electrical energy. An antenna receives the beat frequency radiation. The beat frequency radiation from the antenna is transmitted to a converter via a conductor or waveguide and converted to electrical energy having a desired voltage and waveform.”

that this energy is high-frequency, & it has a pair of “resonant” inductor circuits, the “wiz-kid” is tapping right into the man-made “no man’s land”. As you can see from the chart (in the above post) radio frequencies are below the part of the spectrum where “visible light” resides, therefore, you can not see them, but they are there.

However, to be absolutely certain, one would need to determine whether a single coil design is capable of tuning into the high-frequency spectrum, & what are the characteristics of such a coil (i.e., frequency of operation, size, inductance, number of turns (loops), composition, etc.) I’ll be surprised. However, if “wiz-kid” has the (magnetic) “flux-capacitor” circuit of “Back to the Future” (the movie w/ Michael J. Fox), then we’ll literally have the tool to change all of our futures… but remember, someone already holds a patent for that “invention” (discovery).

8-)

Free-Energy Source ??? :-o :-o :-o

Interestingly, one can see how “man” fits right inside this “spectrum of energy”. We hear low frequencies w/ our ears, our physiological systems get affected by RF radio-frequencies, our eyes are capable of seeing & therefore detecting a section of the spectrum of “visible light”, & we can telepathically tune into mental visions & sounds, & therefore, because our composition is “multi-dimensional” (across a wide band w/in the spectrum of energy) we could infer that, not only are we composed of components w/in the universal energy spectra, we are thus “universal beings”, not only created by the universe, but we are in “constant” communication (communion) w/ the universe. Each & everyone of us also “resonate” at a particular frequency, which would be your “individual” “natural frequency”. You know what happens when you excite a bridge & make it vibrate or resonate at its “natural frequency”, it destroys itself… Our “natural frequencies” could most likely be derived from our own DNA imprints.

Hubbard Coil Runs Boat On Portage Bay Ten Knots An Hour; Auto Test Next ~
Seattle Boy Inventor Makes Good His Claims of Last December When He Announced Discovery to P.I. ~

Hubbard's Claims ~

If young Hubbard's claims are correct regarding the newest coil he has perfected, and which propelled a boat yesterday, these are a few of the things the coil would do without cost other than the initial outlay of $90:

Drive a large touring car at normal speed.
Illuminate a moderate-sized office building.
Furnish current for lighting, cooking, and heating for a large residence
Heat seven two room apartments.

Alfred M. Hubbard, Seattle boy inventor of a device which for want of a better name he terms an atmospheric power generator, yesterday made good his prediction that he would drive a motorboat with the apparatus as a source of
power.

An eighteen foot boat, propelled by a thirty-five-horse power electric motor, which obtained its current from the Hubbard coil, was driven about Portage Bay on Lake Union. Among those who witnessed the demonstration was a well-known local capitalist, the inventor's father,William H. Hubbard, and a Post Intelligencer reporter.

The boat traveled at a speed of between eight and ten knots--silently, except for the whirring of a chain belt which connected the motor with the propeller shaft. When the chain belt was removed, the motor ran free at a speed estimated at 3,500 revolutions [the rest of this line is unreadable]

No Hidden Wires Found ~

To guard against the possibility of ordinary storage batteries concealed about the boat as a power source, instead of the Hubbard coil, both electric motor and coil were lifted free from their blocks, but no hidden wiring was revealed. The coil used as a power unit was eleven inches in diameter and fourteen inches in length. According to Hubbard, tests of the coil show a
current of 280 amperes and 125 volts, which, he pointed out was equivalent to approximately forty-five horse power, or sufficient to drive an automobile. The current is pulsating.

The electric motor was approximately twelve inches in diameter eighteen inches in length. It had been reconstructed in order to be used with the Hubbard coil.

After his ride in the strange powered craft the capitalist declared that he was frankly puzzled, but that he desired an electrical engineer in his employ to make an examination of the coil before he felt free to discuss it.

Since last December, when the Post-Intelligencer first made public the claims of the youthful inventor, he has been more or less in retirement, perfecting his coil. He took up his residence in Everett where, with the assistance of Everett backers he worked on his device.

A local capitalist agreed to witness a demonstration of the coil to determine its practicability as a power source. The motorboat was fitted with blocks on which to rest the motor and the propeller shaft geared for a
chained belt.

When the motor was first tried out after its installation in the boat it ran backwards. So involved are the connections between the motor and the coil that fully a half-hour's experimentation was necessary before the motor shaft revolved in the right direction.

That the capitalist was frankly skeptical of the device was plain when he,with two other passengers, boarded the boat at the Seattle Yacht Club wharf. All the machinery that was visible was the coil and the motor, the latter plainly geared to the propeller shaft. The boat shoved off, Hubbard threw the switch, and instantly the boat began to pick up speed.

It circled about the bay and returned to the wharf, with never a slackening of speed. The wires connecting coil and motor had begun to heat under the excessive current, and, fearing that some part of the coil might give way under the extra heavy strain put on it, Hubbard declined to permit the motor to be run continuously for any length of time. It was tried out later several times, after brief periods which allowed the wires to cool, and its power apparently showed no diminution. No instruments were used to test its wattage.

The capitalist admitted that the demonstration intrigued his interest, but that he would wait for his expert's opinion before discussing it.

Following the demonstration, the young inventor declared that within a few days he expected to drive an automobile with the coil as a power unit.

The Coil used yesterday had been built especially for the demonstration, and is nearly twice the size of the coil Hubbard used in his demonstration last winter. The large coil cost approximately $90 to construct. The inventor says that so far as he has been able to learn its life as a power unit is indefinite. He declared that a coil large enough to drive an airplane would be no more than three times the size of the coil used yesterday, and that a machine thus equipped could fly around the world without stopping, so far as the power supply is concerned.

While the device has been patented, the claims for it are so broad that Hubbard says he does not feel safe in making public his secret. In general, he says, it is made up of a group of eight electro-magnets, each with primary and secondary windings of copper wire, which are arranged around a large steel core. The core likewise has a single winding. A coil thus constructed, he says, is lifeless until given an initial impulse. This is done by connecting the ends of its windings for a fraction of a second to an
ordinary[two words unreadable R.L.R.] -ing circuit, he says.

The manner of this momentary charging, however, constitutes the principal secret of the device, according to the inventor, who says that while machinists have built a number of coils for him under his direction, they have been unable to "start" them. In the event the power of the coil should diminish, it can be rejuvenated in less than a second, Hubbard says.

1-- Arrangement of Hubbard coil and motor in boat. The motor is nearest the bow.
2-- Alfred M. Hubbard, inventor of the coil used as a power unit.
3--The boat under way, driven by a motor which obtained its power from the Hubbard coil.

nomad, it looks like all of these previous inventors had similar ideas, about the way to collect “radiant energy” from the surrounding environment via “resonant” circuits (coils & capacitors) tuned to a particular frequency or frequency range. After the original energy is collected & it reaches some “steady state” oscillatory (resonant) characteristics, where these devices don’t need any further assistance (or kick start), it goes on its own providing a constant source of “electrical” power…, same as the “Tesla” Coil.

Now, if we look at ”Hubbard’s Generator Coil”, it looks as an enhanced “Ion Valve” (although we can not be certain we are looking at the exactly the same thing) w/ additional 8-internal electro-magnets, which are not visible from the outside, where all you see is just a large coil.

“While the device has been patented, the claims for it are so broad that Hubbard says he does not feel safe in making public his secret. In general, he says, it is made up of a group of eight electro-magnets, each with primary and secondary windings of copper wire, which are arranged around a large steel core. The core likewise has a single winding. A coil thus constructed, he says, is lifeless until given an initial impulse. This is done by connecting the ends of its windings for a fraction of a second to an ordinary[two words unreadable R.L.R.] -ing circuit, he says.”

I was just checking out some new information when I came across an interesting article. It is called “Crop Circles Decoded”, however, it relates to hidden, or encoded information contained in the “Crop Circles” themselves. They talk about a “magnatron,” which is supposed to be a old device used in the "radio" technology. I personally never heard of the device before, but it seems to be a device “similar” to what conventional TVs use & we refer to as a “tube.”

“It forces electrons to go from a negative terminal to a positive terminal whilst passing through a magnetic field. When electrons encounter magnetic line of force, they rotate (spin) around that line of force before proceeding toward the positive terminal that they are traveling to. That electron/magnetic interaction results in the creation of microwave energies.”

Now it so happens that if you excite water “at a specific frequency at about 27 GHZ - Microwaves 'shake-up' a water molecule to the point where that molecule splits into its constituent parts. Namely, hydrogen and oxygen.”

“By applying a high voltage potential at a frequency which matched the resonant frequency of water. This allowed an 'aperture' to open in the etheric continuum which caused 'higher order' energy (zero point or free energy) to flow in and magnify the combustible energy by a huge factor.”

It looks like “Stanley Meyer” had developed a system for using water as fuel based on this knowledge of water & its “resonant frequency”. However not surprisingly, “Stanley had just completed obtaining 50 million in funding for a research and development center when he was murdered by poisoning at a restaurant in Grove City, Ohio on March 21, 1998.”

I agree, the last thing we want to do is waste our time talking or arguing (positively) about something everyone concurs, is meaningless. So, let’s just say that for the sake of covering all of the angles, & all of the possibilities, I am adding the following…

One thing definitely wrong w/ today’s “politicized science” is that “covering all of the angles & all of the possibilities” might “conflict” w/ their current or future “scheme of control.” As a consequence, we do not get the truth, & we do not get all of the angles & all of the possibilities, in particular, on the more important issues.

I like to keep an open mind. The mind of a “true scientist” or “explorer of the unknown” should be open to even sometimes, contemplate those things that contradict what we think we know. In that light, I keep an open mind. For example, “David Icke” talks about the “shape-shifting reptilians,” & granted, that point of view seems very far fetched to most of us, however, from the point of view of an “open-minded scientist,” if some reptiles can actually camouflage themselves by taking the characteristics of their surrounding environment, why would the same task be out of the question for “humans,” or a derivative of “humans?” They are way smaller than us, while our brains are so much more developed. It is theoretically possible.

Crop Circles – Are “crop circles” real? Or do we imagine their existence? If they are real, then, who creates them? Are they created w/ the use of sophisticated “laser beam technology” from a man-made orbiting satellite? What is their message? Why?

UFOs – Granted I have never seen a UFO or known anyone who swears they have ever being abducted. However, one time I had the following experience – I was outside by the driveway at a friend’s house, & we were talking while looking up to the sky. It was a cool night, the sky was clear, full of stars, & you couldn’t help it but to look up. All of the sudden I spotted a moving “light” which had the same shape & color as any other “star.” The object was moving, literally, from east to west. It was not moving on a straight line, since we know when we see a far away airplane how it moves in a straight line. This object was moving w/ the curvature of the earth. It was so far & bright, that it looked just like a star. Now, shortly thereafter, I also noticed there was another object moving in synchronicity w/ this object, however, this one was moving from south to north. My friend & I were both looking & talking about what we were experiencing, & we were both completely amazed by the experience. Well, the 2 objects crossed paths in the exact middle of the sky & continued their trajectories to the north & to the west, while both keeping their same exact brightness, no trails of any kind, no noise, & nothing else that could explain to us what we just experienced. The whole thing took about perhaps 3 minutes tops, for them to cross the entire sky. Could they have been our own satellites? Perhaps. They were going super fast.

Aliens – Same deal. However, I give them the benefit of the doubt. Theoretically speaking, they can exist. If we can perform space travel, why couldn’t other beings do the same? Why would they want to intercept our radio & TV? If we could actually travel to any other world or planet, I don’t think we would be so obvious. I think we would do the same thing, sneak up on someone we could take advantage of. We do that now.

However, one thing does strike me as definitely interesting is the fact that usually the government denies things that are very real, but because of the benefit they get from keeping them secret, they even spend a lot of time an effort ridiculing, mockering, & trashing any evidence that supports to the contrary. And we know, they do this for both UFOs & extraterrestrial aliens. They have also for a very long time stuck to the idea that a perpetual motion machine is just not possible. However, we have both seen how people around the world have tapped into sources of free-energy, & those who have gotten too close, are now dead.

Anyhow, w/o wasting any more time, all I’m saying is that when I look at these “unknown” things, I keep an open mind, & by the same token, I would never ridicule anyone who claims they can talk w/ invisible people.

I think the information about extracting energy from water while exiting it at it’s natural frequency is relevant to the research of free-energy sources. If this information is indeed depicted in several crop-circle formations, I think that is even more interesting, whether crop-circles are man-made or extraterrestrial-made.

The fact that we have some very smart “autistic” people in our world proves to me how little science really knows about the human computer. Yes they can amputate or transplant almost any organ, including blood & brain tissue. They can modify (change) genes (i.e., gene therapy). They can “clone” an animal from fertile cell material & DNA taken from a healthy living animal by forcing cell division. They can turn a “stem cell” into another kind of cell (i.e., muscle, blood vessel) However, they can not create a “stem cell” from inorganic compounds, let alone create a complete human being out of nothing. This proves how little do we really know about the human being.

The Current State Of Project Lotus - The Shiva Portal & Ganesh Particle
http://solder.ath.cx/Burisch/billh/ganesh.htm

Logic:

Because we may have shot down an alien spacecraft does not imply that we are more advanced than they are. Perhaps they were not guarding themselves the day they got shot down, that’s plausible. They could be more advanced in some areas & less advanced than us in other areas. There are no absolutes.

Holding someone down (hostage) doesn’t necessarily imply “spiritual” superiority, even though it does not say much for their captor's “spiritual or moral” fitness. In addition, we don’t know if they are indeed spiritual to any degree. Telepathy does not imply spirituality.

“Teleportation” is a concept we created. Whether they have implemented a “teleportation” mechanism does not make them more or less “alien”, or more or less “real”.

Because we can do similar things (i.e., fly through space, screw around w/ DNA & the “Ganesh Particle”) does not imply that “Aliens” &/or “UFOs” are not a possibility in our universe…

Because anyone want to say that Area-51 is just “science-fiction” & a creation of our imagination ala X-Files does not imply that Area-51 does not exist & it’s not real. But that’s why it is a top-secret installation.

Nikola Tesla & Some Of His Achievements
"Of all the frictional resistances, the one that most retards human movement is ignorance, what Buddha called 'the greatest evil in the world.' The friction which results from ignorance can be reduced only by the spread of knowledge and the unification of the heterogeneous elements of humanity. No effort could be better spent." – Nikola Tesla.
http://www.crystalinks.com/tesla.html