Friday, February 10, 2017

I hate to keep beating a dead orange horse, but team trump, you really have to get your s**t together.

Let's forget, for a minute, all the seriously wrong, ill-prepared, and unqualified people the president has appointed to cabinet positions. That is bad, but it's not as bad as his minions breaking the law.

We will start with Kellyanne Polls, who clearly broke the law by promoting the sale of Ivanka trump's products on FOX VIEWS from the White House.

“I hate shopping, but I’m going to get some myself today,” Conway, a special counselor to the president, said from the White House briefing room. “I’m going to give it a free commercial here, go buy it today.”

Whoops!

Even more egregious than one Conway did, though, is what transpired between the Russian Ambassador to the United States and trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn. (I hope that he at least knows what the START Treaty is.)

"Michael Flynn, President-elect Donald Trump's choice for national security adviser, held five phone calls with Russia's ambassador to Washington on the day the United States retaliated for Moscow's interference in the U.S. presidential election, three sources familiar with the matter said.The calls occurred between the time the Russian embassy was told about U.S. sanctions and the announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he had decided against reprisals, said the sources. They spoke on condition of anonymity, citing internal U.S. government deliberations about the issue.The calls raised fresh questions among some U.S. officials about contacts between Trump's advisers and Russian officials at a time when U.S. intelligence agencies contend that Moscow waged a multifaceted campaign of hacking and other actions to boost Republican Trump's election chances against Democrat Hillary Clinton." [Source]

Of course, the trump administration lied about these calls ever taking place, but now, thanks to good reporting, we are learning that they did.

The craziest part of this story is trump saying that he was not aware of what Flynn did. (If you believe that I have a wonderful antique bell here in Philly with a slight crack on the side to sell you.) Trump, who is always watching the news and wants to know everything going on with all of his people, did not know that General Flynn had conversations with the Russians? I need a break.

Finally, remember that salacious dossier that contained some rather racy things (ahem ahem, golden showers) about our president that he called "fake news"? Well, as it turns out, it might not be so fake after all.

"As noted by correspondent Jim Sciutto earlier today, multiple current and former law enforcement and intelligence officials have stated that an intelligence intercept has confirmed some of the conversations described in the dossier.

Sciutto did state that this doesn’t confirm the more extreme allegations made in the dossier but intelligence and law enforcement agencies now have greater confidence in the document’s credibility.

Sciutto also pointed out that when they tried to get a comment from White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on the story, Spicer told them “we continue to be disgusted by CNN’s fake news reporting.”' [Source]

Sorry Sean, given your administration's track record of late, we are riding with CNN on this one.

123 comments:

Widdle Drumpfy's fe- fes got hurt because no one is supposed to tell a Drumpf no.

Can you imagine the koyote kerfluffle if Obama had disparaged the courts and judges the way this shitgibbon has? And we get crickets from wingnuts.

Dear Donnie, we'd appreciate it if you would keep your pie hole shut, but we are more concerned with being primaried than whether you trash America. We have your back no matter how/when you screw up. Just don't tell us about it, okay? Our base always falls for the we had no idea he'd do this excuse. Love to Mel....what's her name.

I think someone must have reminded Flynn that lying to the feebies is different than lying to the media, in that you can go to prison for it.

"I don't remember" is a classic play from the Republican book (see also: Gonzalez, Alberto) as in "We don't have to sweat our 22 million missing emails because the Attorney General can't remember any of them existing under oath in front of the senate even when questioned by Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III." Which, as I recall, caused president Bush to declare that he had even more confidence in his AG than before the travesty of a hearing. Which sort of made sense: Weak ass presidents such as W or Trump value loyalty above all else because they know they're gonna need backup for their fuck-ups when they get exposed in the light of day, and Gonzalez had just spent all day professing to be a low functioning pinhead in front of the senate and on national TV, when he was obviously not that stupid, and more importantly from W's standpoint, he did it for his president. So I guess the lesson here is that if you're a Republican, debasing and humiliating yourself in public is a viable career option. No wonder Trump idolizes Putin, Vlad doesn't have to put up with such unpleasantries, if he doesn't like you, he can just have you poisoned or shot down in front of the Kremlin.

Trump and Flynn pissed off the wrong people. The intelligence community AND the media? Flynn reportedly pissed off a lot of people in the NSA before he got fired so where do you think this "leak" came from? A bunch of spooks pissed at the Donald and why not hurt Flynn in the process? Ha!

It's easy to become a race denier. Just mention that some races and ethnic groups have historically been third-world tribal peoples and that they have yet to demonstrate a capability to create and operate the sort of infrastructure we rely upon in the first-world West. That's when they'll start shouting that we're all the exact same, all bleed red, and it's only skin color that's different.

- Different immune systems- Different hormonal levels- Different follicle structures- Different epigenetic activation - Different olfactory responses- Different ocular responses- Different muscle densities- Different gestation periods - Different bone structures - Different tendon/ligament structures/distributions- Different brain sizes- Different average heights- Different average fat distributions - And the list goes on (skin color doesn't even make the list)

However, when you allow the sophists to write about it, they have one presupposition: Race is socially constructed! And so they either (a) ignore all those differences and say that they aren't real, or (b) they chalk those differences up to mere family heritability and not any sort of group-wide ethnic traits. They will flat-out say shit like, "No scientific basis exists for notions of racial differences as biological, genetically inherited differences" (from the #1 Google article LMFAO!), while taking heart medicine that's specifically designed for their RACE because taking the wrong kind will fucking kill them.

Seems to be a common thing that people are anti-science in the realm of politics. Creationists deny it in droves to claim a young Earth. Progressives are equally ignorant, denying it for sex chromosomes, which they claim are socially constructed, and many are denying it for racial differences, which they claim do not exist.

It all boils down to the idea of coddling human beings because self-confidence and feeling good, never having to be emotionally disturbed, is the "new" idea on pushing humanity forward. Fuck learning useful materials. Fuck knowing the truth about anything. Go to college, be segregated based on your identity in a safe space, avoid any and all information that might bring about negative emotions, and lean on the state for support.

We're a fucking species that survived world wars, plagues, famine, an ice age (well, some of us), etc. Used to be a time in our history where women would lose half their children before birth or as toddlers. Used to be an average life span in the 30s. Used to be we had to step over dead people in the streets to get where we were going, with no plumbing or safe food or TV or Internet. We're programmed to handle all that shit. But these quirky motherfuckers today want to propagandize us to the point we never have to feel emotionally uncomfortable.

Better to teach children that we're all the same, from the same factory, rather than teaching them that some may have to try harder to achieve success because they're from a place of tribes and other people experienced evolutionary changes to push them into more cooperative societies. Protect the FEELS at all costs!

What's the big horrific evil in telling Johnny that he may have to try harder because his people never stopped being primitive tribes? Instead, tell him that everyone is exactly the same and the reason he can't grasp physics like the other kids is due to white supremacy!? Fucking idiots.

* 46% of these knuckledraggers think there should be a White History Month.

* 51% of them agreed with the statement: "the Bowling Green massacre shows why we need Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration" (In other words, an imaginary act of terrorism justifies banning all Muslims.)

Just freaking depressing. It's amazing that most of red-state America doesn't die from forgetting to breathe.

On the other hand, the rest of the country (according to that poll) opposes every one of Trump's policies, and the only question Trump wasn't under water on was whether he should be impeached right now. That question was a 46-46 split that he only eked out because his supporters are afraid of a Pence presidency. His supporters did, however, think that he should be able to set aside court rulings that he doesn't like. So yes, they are very, very stupid.

Interestingly enough, and apropos for this sort of discussion, the same people who're busy making the argument that one race isn't predisposed to do better at physics than another race cannot themselves understand elementary school English words like aggregate.

Poor bastards think that if it's not 100% identical across the board, then no conclusions can be drawn for the average. (Obviously you're tipping your hands here by showing unequivocally a complete lack of scientific or mathematics understanding. How ironic.)

Not sure how those white supremacist institutions did on teaching the mean, median, mode and average and suchlike, but apparently that knowledge didn't stick, to the extent it was taught at all.

Uh oh! Neil deGrasse Tyson is smart and Billy Bob still lives in a trailer and works in the sewer! There goes the entire body of work put into aggregate genetic predisposition, not to even mention the fact that it's also ironic you insist on arguing and don't know what "predisposition" means. Having trouble? Google some of this shit.

Why do people insist on becoming the stereotype to fight against the stereotype? LMFAO! Your fundamental lack of understanding proves my point for me. You don't know what simple words mean yet want to argue there's no inherit learning disability. Find better spokespeople for your cause, for fuck's sake.

Smart black kids???? You inbred fucks barely understand the concept of fire destruction is all you know and dat be tasks is wearing very thin in a world where everything is given because you are incapable of accomplishing anything of merit yourselves ookookookookookookook

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.

Josh is super-duper intelligent. Like massively intelligent in a way that black folks and working class white folks are generically incapable of being.

His I.Q. is like 'yooooge it's like the biggest I.Q. ever. Enormous.

What's more, it's entirely our fault that Josh's life is a giant fuck up. No really, cuz we are so whiney and demanding of socialist shit like 'equality of opportunity', 'equal rights', & 'descent education and health care' and all that other Marxist crap - talented white people like him just can't get a break.

I mean when was the last time you saw a talented, intelligent white person get a good job and move on with life in the USA? I ask you, when? That's right - 1973. That's when reverse racism started and wrecked everything for talented, intelligent white folks who know the definition of haplotypes, and were naturally very clever and smart, with yuuuge I.Q.'s.

Josh's fucked up life is our shame, our cross to carry. Sad. Our punishment for our collective crime, is that we must read his tedious, whiney, oh-so-hurt, and oh-so-put-upon rants, which his made up "facts" and the lies he spreads when someone attempts to relate him with the concept of reality - for all eternity. Yes, he's a boring one-trick-pony, but as I say that's our fault God is punishing us for our sins by sending Josh along to drive us loopy with the skull-crushingly repetitive tedium of his posts.

Josh 2 Smart-the supposed evolutionary biologist with cow ledge degrees coming out his/her ass- In yer learned opinion,you rascal, is the fact the elegant, graceful and dignified Barack and Michelle Obama did not use their time in the WH to enrich themselves while the Clampett clan from Queens New York is in the WH solely to enrich themselves, a sign that greedy,disgusting, deplorable, despicable white trailer trash have not evolved as far or as fast as Blacks? What say you, oh wise one?

In 1985 the US took in 125000 undocumented Cubans.Between 1975 and 1995 we took in 2 million undocumented Vietnamese.Between 2011 and 2016 we took in less than 15000 overly vetted Syrian refugees. OMFG the sky is falling!

Not sure about black folks in general. The ones around here specifically? Fucking right. It's like taking karate with little kids. It's cute when y'all get mad and kick, but it doesn't do much of anything.

But don't let me take up too much of your time. I know you have presuppositions to confirm through biased white globalist corporate media who make the case that third-world migrant herds rummaging through first-world countries is FANTASTIC for the host nations!

Or how about finding me some MOAR evidence of racial differences being socially constructed, told by a gender studies graduate who has never heard of fucking haplogroups. The main place you're supposed to look for these traits, and the fucking idiots--yourself included--have no fucking clue what they even are and so don't even try to mention them.

Or maybe go way back and tell me MOAR about how the greenhouse effect cannot happen without people.

Not sure about black folks in general. The ones around here specifically? Fucking right. It's like taking karate with little kids. It's cute when y'all get mad and kick, but it doesn't do much of anything. ----------------Wow, Josh is certainly full of herself huh? Nice use of an analogy but the reality is you're like a little bad ass kid with a runny nose no one wants to go near. No sane individual reads your long assed rambling posts. Just like a goofy kid you claim some kind of victory. Who the fuck has time for you and your bullshit Josh. If it helps you to feel superior to us negroes then by all means join your butt buddy and do so. Good luck with that.

interesting case -Illinois and Indiana ran a joint sting to catch residents of both states, 268 to be exact, who illegally registered in the other states as residents to get hunting and deer permits cheaper.

Given that most of the responsible hunters and gun owners are NRA members and the majority of NRA members are douchebag wingnuts, how many of these fine upstanding individuals illegally voted for Drumpf?

PC, god bless you for giving Josh any attention I'm sure she appreciates it. The thing she doesn't seem to get is that sometimes we just like to discuss politics and such without having to become overrun by white racists who question our humanity. For example, if you are a Black professional and have a website discussing your area of interest it is inevitable that a James or Josh type individual will come and take a shit and ruin any kind of peaceful conversation. Good on you Field for not censoring these assholes because I know that would be the thing that really pisses them off, not being able to disrupt Black folks' flow.

Serf's up, dudes. Wingnuts are freaking out at townhall meetings because constituents demand answers and actions. Jason ChafedButtz of Utah ran into a buzzsaw of people demanding he do his job and investigate Drumpf and his conflicts of interest. Others are being pilloried about the ACA and are not happy when they have to be accoun table to their own constituents.

"The thing she doesn't seem to get is that sometimes we just like to discuss politics and such without having to become overrun by white racists who question our humanity."

Josh comes here because he/she has a deep seated psychological need to prove him/herself intellectually superior to black folks. He needs to feel that he has the power to humiliate black folks (and any white people who have the temerity to disagree with him). That's why he comes here, it's not actually anything to do with us as such, he is simply fulfilling a need. Other than idol curiosity I genuinely don't care about any of that stuff. I neither know nor care what traumas have led him to be the way he is.

However, it offends me when he lies so abjectly - and when I disprove his lies over and over again, he simply waits a week and posts them again! Like nothing's happened. So I dunno, I appreciate that he will never change, that he is beyond the level of damaged that any help that any of us could give him. So ignoring him (as you all do) is probably the way to go, but I have this thing about truth - people like him offend me because they are liars, not because they are racists. His racism is simply a symptom of his condition.

You know, my brother used to tell me about the sort of racism he lived around in the fifties in Oklahoma, and I saw some of it myself when visiting family in the early seventies, (my little cousin running up to my dad at a high school baseball game and telling him "Uncle Richard, there's niggers leaning all over your car!") Generic grow-up-and-get-over-it bullshit like that. But my cousins did in fact grow up and get over it. So did my brother. Even my dad calmed his shit about black people later in his life. But none of that this-is-how-we-grew-up bullshit came anywhere near the malevolent pig-ignorance displayed on a daily basis in this thread. You bozos do realize you're not doing the white race any favors here, right?

Yisheng: I didn't say either of their names. Haven't read or replied in months.

As I'm sure you know very well PC American conservatives lie almost continously. No Betsy Devos isn't trying to destroy public schools and redirect public money to Christian schools. No Scott Pruitt isn't trying to destroy the EPA for the benefit of big business. No Rick Perry isn't trying eliminate the Energy Department even though he said as much, ect. ect. I guess living in America we just get used to being lied to. Ha!

People like Josh and James lie constantly because they are in denial about their supremacist ways of lives going the way of the dodo. Sure, tr**p got elected, but it's really a last gasp type of thing.

We really need to stop pretending it’s a battle of abstract ideas, and you win if your ideas are consistent and the other side is proved a hypocrite. It’s not an argument, it’s just a cold civil war.

Call me back when I start a civil war in Libya and Syria, and kill half a million people.

Remember Samantha Power and R2P? Where were you when this happened? I’m guessing one of us was cheering the “Arab Spring.” It wasn’t me.

And that’s only taking it back half a decade! Honey, I’m not even starting! Do you see how it’s hard for me to be super appalled if the Trump administration screws up some peoples’ travel plans, or even their careers? In the insane world we live in today?

"Josh comes here because he/she has a deep seated psychological need to prove him/herself intellectually superior to black folks. He needs to feel that he has the power to humiliate black folks"

This is true and is the underlying reason for all of this. Racism. It's funny to see them try to erase any and all accomplishments. For example the strong pushback against the movie Hidden Figures.Not only here but all over the internet we see trolls try to say these events never happened when it is easily proven from NASA's own website! This was the same pushback against the movie Red Tails which is funny to me because I actually had family members who were Tuskegee Airmen so I know the exploits in the movie were true and these were highly skilled and motivated men. I do agree that there is some kind of underlying illness that makes a person go through life trying to belittle and dehumanize others. Kinda sad.

mike from iowa said...Donnie Drumpf sucks ass and so do all of his moronic supporters. Also, Josh likes to sniff his mama's panties.

mike from did not say this, but the troll has the right idea. Click on the troll's mfi and it takes you to a gay porn sight. Got to be a wingnut Drumpf supporter who will swear on a stack of bibles he/she is not gay eeven when caught with Drumpf's tiny johnson in his mouth/ass.

Just like I figured-assholeturf was just another paid drive-by pissant with false accusations and nothing to back them up.

President of Judicial Watch-the wingnut outfit that personally fondled and measured every one of Potus Clinton's zippers sez George Washington would not have been elected if he had to show his tax returns because he was wealthy with interests on par with Drumpf. I swear these creatures are too damn stoopid to still be alive.

"Call me back when I start a civil war in Libya and Syria, and kill half a million people.

Remember Samantha Power and R2P? Where were you when this happened? I’m guessing one of us was cheering the 'Arab Spring.' It wasn’t me.

And that’s only taking it back half a decade! Honey, I’m not even starting! Do you see how it’s hard for me to be super appalled if the Trump administration screws up some peoples’ travel plans, or even their careers? In the insane world we live in today?"

If you've convinced yourself that Samantha Power started the civil wars in Libya and Syria, I can see why you should be pulled away from the Internet conspiracy sites, fitted for a strait jacket, and injected with anti-psychotics.

Despite almost nonstop criticism from politicians, prominent business leaders and the media over President Trump's decision to suspend refugees for 120 days, the public still supports Trump by a margin of 51% to 48%, according to the latest IBD/TIPP poll.

Also, for the first time since 2005, 50% say the country is headed in the right direction.

Drumpf crosses Putin and iowa's junior Senator and former KGB agent Ivanna Kuturnutzov Ernst will castrate Drumpf and eat his oysters on the White House steps. She's had plenty experience castrating pigs and Drumpf wouldn't be a challenge for her skillz.

Do they call you Porker because you like to fuck pigs? Its okay to admit it. You and Li'l Ricky Sanitorium can fuck pigs together and write a bestseller about how Obama forced you into the depraved world of animal husbandry because that handsome Potus Obama was stealing yer girlfriends. Bwahahahahahaha!

Thankfully it appears as if we have multiple online psychologists here who, after starting fucking arguments with me, to which I respond, have it all figured out. How fucking convenient. It's almost like you morons have zero psychological training but just want to team up to chase me away. LOL

Look, safety-in-numbers, you morons humiliate yourselves. I don't fucking do it. How about STFU for a change and stop embarrassing yourselves by attempting to punch up? It's always fucking 20 vs. 1, and all 20 of you end up looking stupid.

I don't ask any of you to dip your toes into conversations that you objectively don't fucking know about. I don't ask people to try to explain heredity to me without using haplogroups (LOL) or to tell me the greenhouse effect can't happen without people. I'm not asking Team Anon if they understand what aggregate means; they choose to look retarded by assuming conclusions to topics with which they can't keep up. Same as TPC does, only he's got the sense to use a spellchecker before posting.

I've been begging people on this forum to get into a conversation with me about evolution and natural selection for a long, long time. I ask the same fucking question: What is a mutation's relationship to natural selection? And I hope that can be a launching point to speak about all these fucking race (i.e. blame whitey) issues with perhaps a new reference point. Not a single one of you can demonstrate you know even the most rudimentary information about the topic, as you cannot answer the question, yet y'all line up to act as if you have an expert understanding of this shit when I write about it.

Just like in fucking real life, you shoot yourselves in the foot and blame whitey for the hole.

I don't ask you to embarrass yourselves. You fucking can't help yourselves. You see a complete stranger, a person whom you'll never meet, inside of your echo chamber, and you go fucking berserk. You couldn't stop spamming retarded shit if you wanted.

Maybe it's one of those "black thangs" some of you speak so much about.

I do know this: Every group thinks it's special in terms of victim status. When I embarrassed the ancient astronaut theorists, they said I just had something against them personally. When I did it to the Bigfoot cunts, they told me it was only THEIR community I was against. When I did it to creationist Christians, I was anti-Jesus and a secret Arab. Now that I've found loony-ass black victim cultists, it's WAYCIS when they choose to embarrass themselves.

Might I suggest, Josh 2 Smart, if you want a conversation about evolution and natural selection go find a right wing evangelical blog and bore the shit out of them.

Speaking only for myself I don't give a flying fig about yer ideas on evolution and natural selection. But you don't hear me whining when I get picked on. Some tool is using my identity on here. I haven't asked for his/her death or banishment because I have my big boy pants on and stand the gaff ladled out by losers. You apparently can't. Too bad so sad. Your yoooooge IQ doesn't protect you much, does it?

In North Carolina including Wake, and Alamance County and cities all around Raleigh/Durham , Greensboro and Fayetteville, regular folks from Sales clerks in retail stores like Belk to County workers to large seemingly legitimate and well respected family groups can work along with the criminal population to attempt to sell women they know or are acquainted with into sexual slavery. These groups all work to help identity “Pimps” about possible victims. When they spot a target they usually try to engage the potential victim in some kind of “chatter” or seemingly innocent talk to delay and “distract” the victim so the pimp can show up. They then pull out a device phone or otherwise and text the pimp where they are and the description of the woman. The pimp usually shows up within 15 min of receiving the text. The pimp comes in to “eye” the woman to see if she is the type who fits his profile. Many of those alerting the pimps are women. Those who help alert pimps of potential victims get a cut of the pimps pay off later. Surprisingly the ultimate “prize” according to pimps under law enforcement questioning are white women. Young White Women who have blonde hair and blue eyed victims like Natalie Holloway who disappeared in Aruba several years ago (Google her name if you forgot the incident) are the ultimate “prizes” for Pimps. The next look exotic dark haired white women of the Angelina Jolie protype is the next most in demand. If you suspect sex trafficking at a local well known retail store, grocery store ,

Mike, I've been saying this to you folks since the first day I came here. I'm a skeptic. I've been to right-wing creationist Christian boards. I've been to Nessie and Bigfoot boards. I've been to ancient alien boards. I've been all over the place -- from cryptozoology and 911 truthers to Illuminati and JFK conspiracy theorists. As a skeptic, it's what I do. I'm a member of the skeptic community. Much of the bullshit I've found, I've mailed to Dr. Phil Mason, and some of it he's exposed as one of the most popular skeptic YouTubers in history: Thunderf00t. (Solar Roadways, Waterseer -- bullshit.)

Then I found the dumbest of ALL the conspiracy theories: Whitey's holding black people down! My initial reaction was, "These people don't actually believe this, right? Surely they know that white people physically cannot be responsible for identical black circumstances all over the globe!" But lo and behold, you people really are true believers, even guilting a few whites into wearing safety pins around here to virtue signal.

You want an echo chamber, I understand. You want to sit in here and team up on white people as a whole and speak about how racist they are. You want to support one another without dissent. Same thing you SJWs do every time you shout Milo or Ben Shapiro down as "racist." But fuck that. So long as Field allows dissenting views here, I'm calling bullshit on your bullshit.

And I know you don't care about evolution. None of you do. And that's because evolution thoroughly debunks your entire victim cult. Once we realize that Africans bereft white support create Haiti, it becomes abundantly clear that the reason more whites are successful and more blacks are impoverished is due to the happenstance of evolution and not some systemic racism holding you back. Evolution is the last thing you folks want to hear about, which is why it's called "dangerous" racism, responsible for Dylan Roof, to simply point out facts about the complete lack of Sub-Saharan advancement in world history.

Reality check for all the racist evil albino trolls your here trying desperately for some acknowledgement from people who hate you, on a daily basis must be fun to have nothing else in your empty pathetic existence, because you have no lives I must remind you of the difference

You black collectivists are, without a shred of doubt, the MOST entertaining conspiracy cult I have ever ran across! Yes, I post here because it's fun reading the replies. I laugh constantly at the hypocrisy, double-think, and the hordes of logical fallacies used on the daily.

Something I'm LMAO about as I'm typing this: Flying Junior's self-righteous cuntiness. He'll read Random calling for the entire extinction of white people, and read you say the most horrid shit about white people one can think of, and not a single word spoken to you. Yet I point out a factual point of history that Sub-Saharan Africans present as a third-world race that has never created any societal advancement of its own, and he calls me dangerous, hateful, and the reason fucking Dylan Roof killed people.

I'd pass out if I LOL'd any harder at his stupid hypocritical, cherry-picking, racist ass!

It's funny because he exposes himself as the fucking racist. Black people can say the nastiest shit imaginable about whites, and he scrolls right past it (undoubtedly agreeing with it). But anyone who tells the TRUTH, that blacks are not responsible for creating the first-world West, and it's "dangerous" and "extreme" to hold those views. It's not a fucking view, dumbshits. It's a historical fact. Objective. Demonstrable. Universal. No? Prove it fucking wrong! Trick challenge, obviously. It cannot be, as it's simply the truth.

You people are pure entertainment. Not the highlight of my day to see TPC fail miserably at making a case for factory-created, identical races, by using someone who doesn't even know haplogroups; I'd rather drink a 12 of Bud Light and play Assassin's Creed and avoid arguing with the old lady. Plenty of shit tops the list. But the LULZ keep me coming back.

For instance, Random; your inability to write English as well as the average second-grader is fucking HILARIOUS.

Not when he's exercising powers Constitutionally reserved to the President, no.

That is called "judicial overreach", and will get the kritarchy's wings clipped. Given the Trumpenfurher's skill at 4-D chess, that may well have been his goal at the outset.

"we'd appreciate it if you would keep your pie hole shut"

You don't realize it yet, but you don't matter any more.

"Trump voters are officially stooooooooooooooopid."

You won't admit any surveys of 'hood rats on the utter nonsense THEY believe. Most People Are Idiots (MPAI), but Black people take the cake in that regard.

"It's amazing that most of red-state America doesn't die from forgetting to breathe."

If it wasn't an autonomic function, you would haven't survived infancy.

"idiots like you and James are predisposed to understanding physics."

Physics, chemistry and the rest favor those able to grasp them. That doesn't map evenly to the races of the earth, so have Disparate Impact and are Oh-fish-oh-wee Wayciss®. You're welcome.

"explain to the dumb white kids why they can't grasp mathmatic and scientific concepts as quickly as the smart negro kids?"

The set of smart negro kids is vastly smaller. The 1 standard deviation gap has consequences.

"sometimes we just like to discuss politics and such without having to become overrun by white racists who question our humanity."

By politics you mean "your so-called oppression by wypeepo", as you culturally appropriate White everything down to the English language and enjoy the highest standard of living of people of your race anywhere in the world.

Blogger has this thing called "private blogs", available only to select users who are logged in. If that was what you were after, you could easily have it... if you were bright enough to pay attention.

"it is inevitable that a James or Josh type individual will come and take a shit and ruin any kind of peaceful conversation."

So all of this "fuck White people" stuff never really happened here, eh? If you ever discussed how to peacefully leave White countries and go do your own thing back in Afreaka, you would suddenly enjoy the most enthusiastic assistance you've ever seen. Try it, it'll blow your mind.

"It's funny to see them try to erase any and all accomplishments. For example the strong pushback against the movie Hidden Figures."

It's funny how these so-called "accomplishments" were buried at the time when LBJ was trying to get Ed Dwight onto the LEM crew of Apollo 11, weren't mentioned in ANY of the astronauts's own memoirs or interviews, and conveniently come out just as the people able to authoritatively confirm or deny such stories are dying. This is called "revisionist history", or in words of one syllable, "lies".

"I did NOT know that wanting laws to be enforced is actually "coded" white supremacy. Huh... Guess I'm a white supremacist then!"

When they called me Literally Hitler for wanting Black people to behave themselves and observe the other duties of citizenship in return for the rights they demanded, I realized that the Nazis might have been on to something. No society can survive savage or perfidious minorities without damage, and the majority has every right to insist they be rid of them.

"What is a mutation's relationship to natural selection?"

Ye gods, how simple. Mutations provide the phenotypic variability on which selection acts.

All done by activist wingnut judges. Pathetic whiny sappy little wingnut crybabies. Don't understand how our judicial system works. Drumpf is gonna lose his ass in court time after time because he has no idea how the constitution or anything else works. Get used to losing even more, losers.

If Obama had once disparaged the courts like Drumpf does repeatedly you traitorious bastards would have impeachment papers ready in record time. You and I know that. Wah,fucking wah!

Stoopid ass wingnuts in Tennessee lege trotting out another unconstitutional piece of garbage legislation to show their disdain for women and children because they are stoopid and just because they can get away with it temporarily. GAWD I HATE WINGNUTS!!!!!

"Mutations provide the phenotypic variability on which selection acts."

Also accepted would be the grade-school version: Mutation is what makes natural selection the viable mechanism by which evolution is possible.

It's interesting, at least to me. People who objectively don't know even the most rudimentary aspects of phenotypic distributions and how natural selection function are the ones who want to argue against it, like they have a leg to stand on by linking retarded gender studies observations and claiming waycism.

It's not as if we need to get into (x) average trait variance or Vp = Vg + Ve genetic environmental equations, or Vg = Va + Vd + Vi additives; nor do we need broach even broad-sense heritability as would be expected in laboratory conditions; e.g. H2 = Vg/Vp, nor Va/Vp narrow-sense to conclude ethnic regression slopes of offspring or the bell curve of high-selective mates vs. potentials. Fuck forbid this swayed more toward geometric interpretations whereby R = S and one must account for selection differential relative to responses of selection. And fuggedaboudit if we're going to conclusively show how midparent values affect additive genetic variance, which is why offspring bear genetic resemblance to their parents. We're trying to keep things simple-stupid here, so folks can play along.

Actually using the scientific method to account for observable evidence on the planet, we can place pieces of the puzzle like behavioral modernity and sweeping phenotypic landscape changes onto the board and conclude, reasonably, that races diverge as much--if not more--in behavior and problem-solving attributes as in immune systems and gestation. And by understanding that, in the aggregate, some races are more predisposed to tribes while others society, it makes sense to have such a wide income gap. One race created the entire economic structure used in the first-world, others are inhabitants benefiting from it.

Though rather than arguing based on scientific merit, the response is always "DAT'S WAYCIS!" Which brings up the most important point: So what?

Well now Mr. Professional Skeptic ... are you skeptical when thugs in police uniforms commit murder clearly captured on video and get away with said murder because by definition they cannot break the law because they are the law? ... are you skeptical of studies which show identical resumes with only names changed receive different outcomes depending on how African the name sounds? ... are you skeptical of "true the vote" when no shortage of dumbass right wingers have spilled the beans? Are you skeptical of racial superiority "research" which has no purpose but to justify persecution of whatever minority group the prejudice of the "researcher" who undertakes such sets out to justify? Josh you obviously think you have something to prove. Haplobabble aside, if what you are trying to prove is that you will inherit the earth in a million years (or maybe sooner if you and the prick that follows you on this thread go on a rampage or something), no one else gives a shit. I didn't take you for a hater but you have made a believer out of me. You really are a tired act.

In interviews on CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox, Miller repeated the same talking points about the president’s travel ban, asserting that the judiciary was not the “supreme” branch of government for deciding on the constitutionality of laws.

Drumpf's dummies really are THAT stoopid. And of course the bloviater in chief thought Miller did a good job lying.

"are you skeptical of studies which show identical resumes with only names changed receive different outcomes depending on how African the name sounds?"

Good question, Lance. The answer: I most certainly am skeptical of those studies! You should be, too. After all, they're using confirmation bias and skewing results by cherry-picking data.

Start with a question: Are black people being discriminated against due to their names on applications? Now, address how we would find that out. Why, you'd attempt to juxtapose names you considered "black" sounding up against names you'd consider non-black sounding. But be really careful here! As people conducting the study, it's imperative not to be a moron here and forget that name associations are powerful. This isn't racism; this is simply word association. Imagine telling your blind date your name is Ted Bundy. Why don't parents name their male children Adolf? What do you think of when people name their kid Jordan? It's crucial here, if you want to conduct a study on names, that you understand socioeconomic and other societal connotations of names.

But what did these people do in the study? They took a name they think sounds ghetto, like LaToya, and they juxtaposed that against a name that they thought sounds more upper-class white, like Emily or Wentworth, etc. So, they're assuming that names themselves have class connotations, yet they refuse to draw from the well of white-trash-sounding names to match ghetto-sounding names; e.g. they never juxtapose DeAndre with Billy Bob or Bocephus or Betty Ann or Peggy Sue. When these brilliant people behind the study drew from the well, they intentionally used only white-sounding names that had higher socioeconomic connotations, and used only black-sounding names that have more of a ghetto connotation.

Maybe this is what happens when you allow social "scientists" to conduct a study. They look at data we have a fairly clear idea on: Blacks choose to name their children uniquely more than other groups, while most other ethnic groups choose from popular names. But instead of juxtaposing ethnic-specific (denoting class) names against their direct counterparts, they take only the classy-sounding white names for the study. Maybe if they would have gotten physics or biology or engineering graduates to conduct the study, the people involved would have known how to conduct a study.

But these race-based studies are usually bullshit. They're usually carried out by people who aren't lettered in natural sciences and thus don't know WTF they're doing. Remember that white doll vs. black doll study? The "researchers" just went all over America and allowed children to choose dolls. Since most children chose the white doll, their conclusion was that American society was teaching little kids to be ashamed of being black. LMFAO! Holy shit. Anyone who's gone so far as to take high-school chemistry can probably understand how they fucked the dog here. They had no control. They had no baseline. Why didn't they travel to Africa to try their experiment in places bereft white influence? Why didn't they "study" the possibility that human eyes are simply drawn to softer colors and more vivid details? Why didn't they consider the possibility that day-night cycles and the amygdala plays a role in color associations? Why did they only use dolls? (Rhetoric questions; they wanted to support their presuppositions.)

Thanks for bringing this up, Lance! I'm extremely skeptical of these studies. They're typically carried out by people who are (a) completely unqualified to do scientific studies, or (b) people who (like TPC and religious people) start with their presuppositions and work backwards to "prove" them.

The "ghetto connotation" of any "black sounding name" is precisely the point. As for the doll study they didn't just have children choose dolls, they asked why they chose the doll and the response was that black is ugly. And it wasn't just dolls, they showed pictures of children of different colors and said "show me the ___ child" (good, bad, smart dumb etc) and asked why. Whatever it is that you are trying to prove, your obvious contempt for black folks is what comes thru loud and clear.

"In interviews on CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox, Miller repeated the same talking points about the president’s travel ban, asserting that the judiciary was not the “supreme” branch of government for deciding on the constitutionality of laws."

Have you actually read the relevant section of the statute? It quite clearly gives unfettered authority to the President. Funny, when it was Obama telling Arizona it couldn't enforce the clear letter of the law, the President's power was all fine with you. But when it's the other way around...

Neither Robart nor the 9th Circus even mentioned the text of the law in their decisions. This proves that they are consciously legislating from the bench. This may get the entire 9th Circus abolished and new circuits established. It's certainly long overdue.

"they showed pictures of children of different colors and said "show me the ___ child" (good, bad, smart dumb etc) and asked why."

Never did it occur to them, or you, that Black children as well as White children in integrated environments have experience with both Black and White children and have formed associations. Their judgements are not from prejudice, but personal learning.

That's kinda the point. I'm not trying to "prove" anything. I'm saying that the study is drastically flawed and used only the conductors' confirmation bias. There are many ways to set up controls and baselines in studies. Sorry, Lance; whatever you think of me, that study was objectively NOT scientific. And you don't have to take my word for it. Look at a real study for gauge. Look at, say, studies on PTSD or even hard science like Jupiter's moons for reference of how real studies are conducted. They never tested the idea of color or how our eyes register color or how a certain color may evoke a different emotion in people (oh, I'm felling so BLUE!). They went only with representations of children and sought to confirm their biases. Why not also study it in the Congo where small black children have no earthly idea of what a white person even is? Rhetorical question. Why not, as James mentions, also study associations these children already had with other children? The answer: Because the potential for crushing the presupposition exists.

"The "ghetto connotation" of any "black sounding name" is precisely the point."

You're proving MY point! I mentioned names like Adolf and Jordan, and the FACT that WORDS--you fucking moron; LANGUAGE!--have connotations. They INTENTIONALLY chose names that THEY THEMSELVES BELIEVED had negative connotations, and juxtaposed them against names that THEY THEMSELVES BELIEVED had positive connotations. What they didn't do: Use white names that have negative connotations, like redneck-sounding white-trash names. Why didn't they do that? Rhetorical question. The answer: Because the potential for crushing the presupposition exists.

It's not fucking racism to blame for names having negative connotations, unless someone's a cuck like you and believes that the ONLY words with negative connotations that exist are black-sounding names. Which is just bullshit on its face.

"your obvious contempt for black folks is what comes thru loud and clear."

These sophist arguments are old. You don't actually have an argument, so the race card comes flying out at break-neck speeds. Seriously. It's so fucking tiresome. You people need a new trick or two.

But more to the point, so fucking what? So fucking what if I were actually a white nationalist and a flag-waving, card-carrying member of the KKK? How would that change the FACTS here that these studies are utterly flawed pieces of bullshit? This is the problem with you cunts who worship identity politics. If Trump tells you the sky is blue, you'll want to get into a semantics sort of argument and explain how that's technically a lie. Whereas if someone on your team, like Obama, said it, then everyone needs to agree or they're RACIST. You folks are the reason these studies are inherently flawed. You start out with the conclusion (white people are racist), and you work backwards to prove it.

And let's not forget the MOST important point here: You're the one who asked me about my skepticism toward the study, you fucking abject failure of a human being. Now I say I don't think the study's scientific, and suddenly I have contempt for black people because I don't allow an objectively flawed study to change my way of thinking. There's not a single thing about that study that makes it scientific, other than the fact sophist social science outlets choose to post it because it confirms their shared presuppositions. Fake news has been around since the dawn of man.

It's always the people without a scientific education who are the biggest cheerleaders for pseudoscience. And that's to be expected. You're literally their target market. They're not looking to be published in peer-reviewed journals. They're looking for emotional genderqueer beta males like you to push forth their narrative.

Flattery will get you nowhere asshole. "The only words with negative connotations are black sounding names"? You have it ass backwards as usual. The point is that any black sounding name (any as in 100%) has "connotations". As do you, as anyone here including the prick that precedes you on this thread will tell you. The only difference between you and him is you haven't made overt threats yet. But you are getting there.

Does any black-sounding name have "connotations"? Really? Is that your expert opinion?

It was the expert opinion of fake scientists too. And how did they seek to prove it? Well, by creating a fake fucking study to juxtapose names THEY believed carried negative connotations against names THEY believed to carry positive ones.

That's the point your simple fucking ass is missing here, moron. These people who started the research themselves chose names they personally believed held negative connotations! I.e. THEY were discriminating against people with certain names! That's how they started the study, by picking the BEST sounding "white" names and the WORST sounding "black" names. LOL Holy shit.

Want to know other ways the study was fatally flawed on top of starting from a biased perspective and refusing to create a metric against negative connotation white names?

There's no gauge of employers' races, for starters. The study simply implies that every single employer in the entire world is white, and that black people only need jobs and cannot be in a position to hire. But maybe there were black bosses and managers saying, "I ain't hiring this ghetto baby!" but why wouldn't they list that information? The farthest they go is to say "employers in African-American neighborhoods," which still doesn't say the bosses were black. This is important information to know. Are white people discriminating at higher rates?

They debunk their own fucking study by explaining the variant! LMMFAO! I don't make this shit up, I swear. In resumes where the black-sounding name appears to live in a wealthier location and not the ghetto, the data adjusts to reflect on par with white resumes. What this is saying: It's not the ghetto-sounding NAME that's the problem. It's that employers don't want to hire folks from the actual GHETTO! And are you going to blame anyone for that?

Again, you simple bastard, think hard here and see if you can spot what's wrong with this. Why aren't they also using white resumes that claim to be from the trailer court or a mountain holler in Kentucky? Becky's resume is always from a nice, quite little cul de sac. Jamal's is in the heart of Chiraq. Fucking dumbasses. This shit is a disgrace to real studies. Only uneducated pampered Americans would believe such shit (and probably a few English wogs...).

Josh you are dumber than a dildo. So they didn't use white trash names? Who the fuck would put Billy Bob or Bubba on a resume? For that matter they didn't use Beulah, Tupac, or Dirty Old Bastard either.

"I ain't hiring this ghetto baby"? How the fuck would they know the race of the hiring manager? They just sent out resumes in response to a bunch of random newpaper ads. The managers were all black? Could be. But do you don't really believe that do you?

Everything else you say is bullshit. Read the study and convince yourself. Meanwhile not a peep out of you on thugs in uniform, "True The Vote" etc. Whatever. Keep on babbling about genotypes, phenotypes, no one gives a shit. You think we all are the racists not you, I am not going to try to convince you otherwise. But when even the resident Nazi thinks you are a racist you might want to check yourself out.

Why so racist, you fuck-wit? Not every fucking white person is named Josh or Lance or Emily or Wentworth. Holy shit; all you progressives are capable of is projection. Some guys are named BUBBA, you projecting bastard!

"How the fuck would they know the race of the hiring manager?"

Well, it's an important thing to find out if you want to draw the conclusion that people are being discriminated against. Why? Because, apparently, black people CANNOT be racists. Only white people can. So if it's not actually white people doing the discrimination, Field's gonna have a pretty big list of house nigglets, ain't it?

"Read the study and convince yourself."

Unlike you, I have read the entire study, and even copycat studies. And, not shocking at all, they claim to EVEN OUT in callback rates among people whose resumes don't claim to live in the smack-dab middle of the ghetto. So it's not actually NAMES at all that people are discriminating against; it's more about LOCATION. But since you're a moron, you missed that part. And likely is the case these people have a good reason for wanting to avoid hiring people from the ghetto, and who the fuck are you to tell them otherwise? Start your own fucking business and hire ghetto residents and change the world!

"Meanwhile not a peep out of you on thugs in uniform"

Yeah. And did you know the moon's not really made out of cheese? Did you know blue whales are the largest mammal on the planet? Let's see -- what else weren't we speaking about that you're somehow going to hold against me for not mentioning. Holy fucking shit, Lance, you are one retarded motherfucker.

Right. I haven't read shit. I just happen to know what the study actually says, how it was conducted, why it fails to use a control or baseline, and how it is objectively flawed by being set up to operate on confirmation bias; whereas your take on it is that every single "black" name in the world carries a negative connotation. LMFAO! You don't even pretend anymore not to be a fucking retarded person. You've dropped the pretense completely.

You're another white liberal projection machine, viewing every single black as some poor victim, believing every single white has an uppity name and is doing well, and yet it's everyone else who's racist -- never you.

You're a joke.

By the bye: This "haplobabble" of which you speak is literally responsible for heredity and the human population. Now, you think it's more important in life to defend a fixed, biased study than to understand genetics. And that's fine. Live your life how you see fit. But maybe since you have the literal education of a middle-school student, it would be better for you to STFU and let the educated people speak.

TWEET ME

@fieldnegro

Follow the The Field Negro via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER

*COMMENTS, LINKS, AND CUT AND PASTE ARTICLES, ARE NOT ALL ENDORSED BY THE PUBLISHER.

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

MORE DISCLAIMERS

***The views expressed on this site are the field's and the field's alone. They do not reflect the views of his employer, or any professional or legal organization with which he is affiliated.***

This is a commercial free blog.

Money is nice, but being able to speak my mind is better.

"Real talk: Daniel Rubin has a great little piece up wherein he chats with The Field Negro, the Philly-based blogger who sharply ponders all things black on a daily basis. (Seriously, if you’ve never checked in with TFN, you should: Its author, Wayne Bennett, is a fantastic read who can cut through bullshit like a hot knife through butter, which is a far grosser analogy than I wanted to make, but there you have it.)" ~Philebrity~

"One of the most precocious and hilarious Black political minds on the net. Ive been a long-time fan!" ~Asad Malik~

"..While most of what he writes is tongue-in-cheek, his space is a safe house for candid discussions about race, especially in the comments section, where people of all colors meet."~~Daniel Rubin, "The Philadelphia Inquirer"~~

"To white people, Bennett's musings are like kitchen-table talk from a kitchen they may otherwise never set foot in. To African Americans, he is part of a growing army of black Internet amateurs who have taken up the work once reserved for ministers and professional activists: the work of setting a black agenda, shaping black opinion and calling attention to the state of the nation's racial affairs."

~~Richard Fausset, "L.A. Times"~~~

"That's why I love the blog "Field Negro" so much. Field, as he's known to his fans, has the sense of reality that it takes to call out the (CowPuckey) of blame beating by those who are in positions of power and their lackeys. Because of his handle and his unabashed way of writing about racial issues, Field is often cited as a "Black blogger." What he is, however, is a first-class detector of blame deflection and an excellent student of history. If you want to write about the past and future of repression there's really no other perspective to take - which is why everyone should read Field."

"Half a century after Little Rock, the Montgomery bus boycott and the tumultuous dawn of the modern civil rights era, the new face of the movement is Facebook, MySpace and some 150 black blogs united in an Internet alliance they call theAfroSpear.

Older, familiar leaders such as Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton and NAACP Chairman Julian Bond, are under challenge by a younger generation of bloggers known by such provocative screen names as Field Negro, thefreeslaveand African American Political Pundit. And many of the newest struggles are being waged online."~Howard Witt-The Chicago Tribune~

"I had no idea, for example, of the extent of the African-American blogging world out there and its collective powers of dissemination.But now, after reading thousands of anguished, thoughtful comments posted on these blogs reflecting on issues of persistent racial discrimination in the nation's schools and courtrooms, what's clear to me is that there's a new, "virtual" civil rights movement out there on the Internet that can reach more people in a few hours than all the protest marches, sit-ins and boycotts of the 1950s and 60s put together." ~Chicago Tribune Reporter, Howard Witt~