Is there any Evidence that the Ancient Alien Theorist have put forth that has not been Debunked?

What has been debunked? That the earth and moon are hollow? That humans were not capable of building these giant megalithic structures, especially
all the pyramids? That ufos and aliens are real? That humanoids live underground? That there is a cover-up of immense porportion?

I guess everyone that has been taken for a ride by the bilderbergers cant handle the truth now. Chuckle, chuckle. Religion on its own has no merit
unless AA theory helps it out. (sticks tongue down)

It really is just an "I'm smarter/more logical than you," syndrome that have people all up in arms about the AA theory.

A problem with society is the belief that if something isn't logical or make practical sense, then there's no reason for it to happen. Maybe Aliens
did come here and just "pile rocks on top of each other." Maybe Aliens did come here just to poke and prod at us. NO ONE here knows anything about
anything about the world's history - it's all just speculation and some people feel for some reason their speculation holds more merit.

Sure the pyramids COULD have been built by human labor, but it doesn't mean that it was.

Erich von Däniken stresses OVER AND OVER that he's not trying to PROVE IT WAS ALIENS, but is just trying to keep that possibility open, because it
is possible. Anyone denying that is fooling themselves.

CB328
Thank you for such a clear response to this issue. I am personally really tired of people attacking the ancient theory (and show) for no reason other
than they personally don't like the idea (kind of like population control).

You summed up several points of evidence that cannot be debunked factually- just by supposition. I would add to them bible stories that don't make
much sense unless viewed through the ancient astronaut lens (e.g. Tower of Babel, why would an omnipotent god be afraid of human technological
development?)

I can't understand why so many people are on a conspiracy site only to try to shout down every conspiracy put forth.

I have felt the same way for many years. They ask for evidence of anything and then throw it in your face regardless how you word it and regardless
how convincing the evidence is. Its never good enough even for "a conspiracy site".

I have read posts on yahoo lately that are more conspiratorial than the mainstream garbage on this site. The attacks against alex jones, david icke,
john lear, AA theory outnumber the genuine posts by at least 3-1. I guess only certain conspiracies are acceptable, those that dont go too far.
Perpetual skepticism is healthy, believing is uncalled for.

The carving in question was never seen until recently, after renovations were made to the temple in question. It is most likely a NEW carving of a
stegosaurus.

edit on 4-11-2013 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)

And your proof for this conclusion is what exactly?

Oh thats right there isnt any because that is just one assumption.
The other assumption is that its a rhino. Neither assumption has proof, hence they are both valid assumptions.
One may be true but then they both may be false.

Yes, and when the locals are asked about the origin and don't remember it ever being there it most likely hasn't been there long. Maybe you do not
understand the definition of the word plausible, since I never portrayed it as fact. Saying it is NOT a stegosaurus IS portraying fact.

plau·si·ble
ˈplôzəbəl/
adjective
adjective: plausible

1.
(of an argument or statement) seeming reasonable or probable.

So now that you understand the definitions of the words I used you can go back and read my post again. Thanks.

Its plausible that aliens came to earth and created man by doing genetic experiments with their own DNA and that of primates....doesnt mean its true.
Your posting of the definition of plausible is irrelevant.

f4rwest
It really is just an "I'm smarter/more logical than you," syndrome that have people all up in arms about the AA theory.

A problem with society is the belief that if something isn't logical or make practical sense, then there's no reason for it to happen. Maybe Aliens
did come here and just "pile rocks on top of each other." Maybe Aliens did come here just to poke and prod at us. NO ONE here knows anything about
anything about the world's history - it's all just speculation and some people feel for some reason their speculation holds more merit.

Sure the pyramids COULD have been built by human labor, but it doesn't mean that it was.

Erich von Däniken stresses OVER AND OVER that he's not trying to PROVE IT WAS ALIENS, but is just trying to keep that possibility open, because it
is possible. Anyone denying that is fooling themselves.

This is not a post claiming people can not have beliefs. It's a post about evidence. Stpo the logical fallacies and stay on track. If you feel there
is evidence that is not debunked share it. Be specific.

I personally do not know of anything that they have put forward that cannot/hasnot been easily debunked. That stated I do beleive that myths DO have
marit to them and that dieties DO actually exist but not quite in the way that they are recorded/remembered. When I get to my 20 posts I may state how
I beleive that as well as afew other things but as far as ancient aliens the series; it`s pure sensationalism to gain ratings.
As a joke I had heard that the host guy`s hair issue is explained by him VERY slowly being abducted!

There is zero evidence for the annunaki beliefs. This is a post about evidence, not beliefs.

Really? What about the elongated skulls locked up in certain high brow museums throughout the world?

What about the bones of giants found and locked up in certain high brow museums throughout the world?

Give it a rest.

I can answer that in a way you should recognize:

What about the time machines and subsequent videos showing the GP being built by human labor that have been locked up in certain highbrow research
facilities around the world?

What about the Sumerian writings that admit the entire anunnaki story was a fabrication that have been locked up in certain highbrow research
facilities around the world?

What about the skull stretching devices invented by Nazi torturers that are known to have been used on ancient human remains but remain unreported on
and are locked up in certain highbrow war relic depositories around the world?

There is zero evidence for the annunaki beliefs. This is a post about evidence, not beliefs.

Really? What about the elongated skulls locked up in certain high brow museums throughout the world?

What about the bones of giants found and locked up in certain high brow museums throughout the world?

Give it a rest.

In order to answer you will need to be more specific. Simply saying things exist and they are proof is not evidence, it's the ramblings of a person
who CAN'T give evidence. Be specific, tell me what skulls or what bones. We have 6 or 7 pages now of people saying lots of evidence exists without
citing anything as evidence.

They say that to sensationalise for ratings. There are afew explanations for the `specimens` that you mention if they even exist at all. Don`t believe
in something just because a television program or a book tells you is is true. Remember the path that makes the least amount of assumptions are
usually the correct ones.

Galileo400Here is a question that came to me this morning regarding megalithic structures. (Remember, I'm skeptical that any of our
megalithic structures were built by aliens or with alien technology.)

Haven't you heard? The GP produced electricity which was beamed off into outer space and collected by alien motherships. Seriously, that's what they
think. Of course when you ask them to do the math on exactly how much energy gets to the motherships through the method they propose, and then ask
them how any advanced ship could even care about such a miniscule amount of energy they stop talking to you rather than answer.

Galileo400Here is a question that came to me this morning regarding megalithic structures. (Remember, I'm skeptical that any of our
megalithic structures were built by aliens or with alien technology.)

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.