Depuy Trials Underway

DePuy Hip Recall trials ready to begin. DePuy Hip Replacement Lawyers accepting cases in many states. If , need revision surgery or have had revision surgery or metal on metal toxicity we want to speak to you right away. Only claim in state with 2 year statutes or greater are being accepted.

Class Action Article

Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawyers:
Florida Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawyers Still Accepting Cases
As many states begin to drop off the list for filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit, Florida with a 4 year product liability statute of limitations is still bringing in ca...

Class Action News

Dr Levy Class Action Lawsuit: Were You A Gynecological Patient Of Dr Levy?
Do You Want To Join The Dr. Levy Class Action?
$190 Million Settlement For Patients
Dr Levy Calls Action lawsuit Filing
Dr. Nikita Levy had an obstetrics and gynecology pr...

A Transvaginal mesh is a surgical implant which is used to treat POP ( pelvic organ prolapse ) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. These medical problems are a result of a weakened pelvic floor due to age, childbirth, hysterectomy, or menopause.
Because of the agressive sales job done by these medical device manufactures, vaginal mesh repair became very common and now over 300,000 women have a mesh implant.

The doctor used a surgical mesh to help reinforce the vaginal wall and to provide an additional supporting mesh structure to organs like the bladder, bowel or uterus However, it became apparent after several years after this product was used, many women began to experience complications like pain, infection, bleeding, mesh erosion. lower back pain, increased bowel and urinary problems and the inability to have sexual intercourse due to the severe pain. Many complications have resulted form these mesh implants and they all appear to be similiar no matter waht mesh product has been implanted thru the vaginaa:
• Mesh erosion through vaginal wall, bladder or bowel
• Infection that does not go away
Organ perforation
• Pain like a knife
• Urinary incontinence is back
• Recurrence of prolapse
• Bladder, bowel or vessel perforation
• Vaginal scarring
• Pain during sexual intercourse
• Other problems that led to a significant decrease in patient quality of life due to discomfort and pain.
Now, after receiving over 3000 complaints from women who suffered serious injuries caused by polypropylene transvaginal device/mesh, the FDA issued a very detailed and comprehensive statement to warn doctors that they should consider no longer using mesh to treat their patients. Just recently Johnson and Johnson removed 4 Gynecare products form the market and did a label change on the fitth.

If you or a loved one is suffering due to a vaginal mesh implant call us now. We will file a vaginal mesh lawsuit for you and help you locate a doctor.

The FDA issued a safety alert regarding the complications from the off-label use of Infuse in the neck, or cervical area of the spine. These complications, which can be life threatening, include:

Angioedema (swelling of the neck and throat, which can cause fatal suffocation),

Cancer,

Male sterility,

Chronic pain that radiates into the arms and legs,

Respiratory depression,

Nerve damage,

Death

If you or a loved one has been implanted with the infuse bone graft see a ohysician immediately and contact us for a case review, You may be eligible to particapte in a lawsuit against the manufacturer for off label use and:

Cancer – skin (melanoma), thyroid, breast, prostate, lymphoma, pancreatic, ovarian, stomach, leukemia, laryngeal and lung cancers.Sexual Side Effects – including sterility and uro-genital injuries and other sexual complications in males.Uncontrolled Bone Growth – INFUSE has been linked to ectopic or uncontrolled bone growth in patients at or near the surgical site (one study said that 75% of INFUSE patients experienced this complication).Swelling of the Neck or Throat – including trouble swallowing, breathing, and talking.Nerve Injuries – including chronic and severe radiating pain in the arms or legs (such as radiculitis, radiopathy or neuritis).

and wrongful death of a loved one. Speak to our Infuse Bone Graft lawyer helpline today.

The lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are reviewing cases for perforated Uterus from the Mirnena IUD and gathering facts for the formation of a Mult district litigation action. Women implanted with the Mirena IUD are having serious side effects. The most serious is e gravitation of the IUD to a nearby organ causing it to become embedded in the Uterus or other organ. Organ perforation is another hazard of this gravitation. This is the only criteria right now for the Mirena lawsuits.

Lawyers are seeking all women with organ perforation from the Mirena IUD to submit theor medical records and documentation to be reviewed for a Mirena IUD lawsuit against the Mirena manufacturer.

Serious Side Effects of The Mirena IUD

The numbers of women are starting to grow who have had Mirena implanted and are experiencing serious and even debilitating or life-threatening side-effects. The device has been migrating from its original position after being inserted, perforating the uterus or embedding itself in the uterus. In both instances, a doctor must locate and surgically remove the device. Mirena also migrates outside the uterine cavity and cause adhesions or scarring that can lead to infertility. Depending on the damage caused, you may require a complete hysterectomy, and more serious complications could result in death. You must be aware of any and all changes when you have this device and see an emergency physician immediately if you are experiencing any symptoms.

Be Alerted to the following side effects:

Abscesses

Embedment in the uterus

Erosion of adjacent areas such as the vagina

Infertility

Inflammation of the membrane that lines the abdominal cavity and internal organs (Peritonitis)

Stryker recalled both of these products on July 4, 2012 because the metal of the neck and stem can corrode, releasing toxic metal ions that can damage tissue and bones around the hip implant. This can cause severe pain, inflammation, metal poisoning (metallosis from chromium and cobalt), tissue death (necrosis), bone damage, pseudotumers, gait issues, and other serious problems. Revision surgery (to remove and replace the recalled Stryker hip product) may be required.

Stryker initiated this voluntary recall due to potential risk associated with modular-neck stems.

Fretting and/or corrosion at the modular-neck junction,

Pain and/or swelling.

Need For Revision Surgery

Joint loosening/dislocation

Device wear and tear, such as corrosion and fretting

Excessive metal debris leading to metal ion generation

Inflammation of tissue

Hypersensitivity/allergic response

Broken devices

All recipients of these two hip replacements must see their doctor immediately and retain a Stryker Hip replacement lawyer. Do not wait. It is only a matter of time before a new Mutli District Litigation for the Stryker hip Implant becomes T,V news. Lawyers are accepting cases for both of these implants. Contact Class Action Lawyer Network Stryker Hip replacement lawyers today.

Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Implant lawyers accepting cases for stryker Hip replacement
The Stryker Rejuvenate hip replacement device has been linked to an increased risk of metallosis. Although the Stryker Rejuvenate is not a metal-on-metal hip device, it has metal-on-metal components, which are believed to be responsible for the development of metallosis in some patients. According to reports, the Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant device is linked to a high early failure rate, resulting in some patients having revision surgery to replace their hip replacement device. Lawyers are now qccepting cases for the failure of the Syryker Rejuvenate Hip replacement.

The Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant is different from other hip replacement devices in the news recently because it is not a metal-on-metal hip replacement device. Instead, the Rejuvenate hip replacement device, which uses a ceramic component, was meant as an alternative to the metal-on-metal devices. It was marketed to younger patients as a modular hip replacement, meaning the components were custom-made to fit patients better, which was supposed to result in longer-lasting hip replacement devices that offered a better range of motion.

Some patients reportedly developed metallosis after having the Stryker Rejuvenate hip device implanted. Although it was initially believed that such a condition was not possible—because the Stryker Rejuvenate does not have a metal-on-metal ball and socket design—the Stryker hip device has a metal neck piece that can, under some conditions, rub against a metal stem, causing metallic debris to come loose.

Stryker has responded to concerns about the Rejuvenate failure rate by alleging patients did not properly undergo rehabilitation following surgery, or by blaming doctors' implantation techniques. In a Product Correction Bulletin (04/25/12), Stryker officials noted, "Factors such as diabetes and infection may play a role in potential corrosion of an implant as these conditions may affect the pH of the tissue surrounding the implant."

Metallosis is an adverse tissue reaction to heavy metals in the body. It can cause pain, limited mobility, failure of the hip joint, pseudo-tumors, dissolution of the bone, DNA changes and chromosomal aberrations. Patients who have had their Stryker Rejuvenate hip implant device fail may have undergone revision surgery. Typically, hip implants are expected to last 15 to 20 years. In some cases, the Stryker Rejuvenate hips are failing in less than five years. It seems we once again have a failed hip replacement. If you or a loved one has a failed Stryker hip implant or Cobalt or Chromium poisoning call the Stryker Rejuvente Hip Replacement Helpline today.

Lawyers for the victims of the Metronic Infuse Bone Graft are filing lawsuits for victims of off label use of the bone graft.Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft lawsuits are increasing as more victims come forward

Infuse is a bio-engineered bone graft device that is marketed by Medtronic for lumbar surgery. It is intended as a substitute for the traditional surgical procedure involving the taking of a bone graft from the patients hip. The advantage of this product is that no surgery is needed to remove bone from the patient's hip reducing pain and shortening recovery times. However, the introduction of foreign material into the body creates other risks.

The lawsuits allege that Medtronic failed to reveal side effects which Medtronic knew were likely in order to increase sales of the product. These side effects include uncontrolled bone growth called ectopic bone growth that resulted in failures of many surgeries. The active fusion ingredient in the Infuse product is rhBMP-2. The letters BMP stand for Bone Morphogenetic Protein. This ingredient is designed to stimulate bone growth in the spine so that the vertebra will fuse together to relieve back pain.

The lawsuits also allege that Medtronic illegally marketed the Infuse product "off-label". Off label marketing means that the company promoted the product for medical uses for which it was not approved by the FDA. Off label use of drugs and medical devices is permissable by medical professionals and can be beneficial to patients but a pharmaceutical drug or device manufacturer is prohibited by the FDA regulations from promoting or marketing products for uses that were not approved by the FDA.

The primary off label use of the products allegedly promoted by Medtronic was for posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Infuse was only approved by the FDA for anterior approach lumbar fusions. This means that Infuse was approved for for spine surgeries with a surgical approach through the abdomen or the front of a person rather than a surgical approach to the spine through the back. It is alleged that Medtronic paid highly respected surgeons it calls "opinion leaders" to influence surgeons to increase off label use of Infuse in posterior spine surgical procedures.

It appears that the Medtronic Infuse bone graft marketing campaign may be yet another incident of a medical device company putting its profits over people.

NuvaRing lawyers filing lawsuits for blood clots and pulmonary embolisms from NuvaRing. Women are alerted to contact a NuvaRing lawyer immediately for review of their potential NuvaRing lawsuit.

on May 30th, 2012, an Iowa woman, Kristina Marie Isaac, filed a lawsuit in New Jersey District Court (case no. 2:2012cv03240) alleging that her NuvaRing caused her an acute pulmonary embolism. NuvaRing is a popular internal birth control device, a vaginal ring placed near the cervix that was approved by the FDA in 2001. A study published on May 10th 2012 in the British Medical Journal revealed that women who used a vaginal ring had a 6.5 times higher risk for developing blood clots. NuvaRing is a dangerous birth control device causing injury.

What is NuvaRing?

NuvaRing is a ring used for birth control that is inserted in a woman’s vagina once a month, releasing a low dose of hormones to prevent pregnancy.

NuvaRing also has risk of more serious side effects.

stroke,

infarction,

blood clot,

deep vein thrombosis (DVT),

cerebral venous thrombosis

pulmonary embolism

death.

The Problem with NuvaRing? NuvaRing releases the hormones estrogen and progesterone into the patient’s bloodstream.These hormones can cause blood clots and pulmonary embolisms. Organon failed to provide proper and full information for women regarding these severe side effects.

NuvaRing Lawyers are filing Lawsuits for NuvaRing. If you or a daughter or wife or mother has been injured by NuvaRing contact us immediately.

The Mirena IUD along with the vaginal mesh, Yaz, Yasmin are devices and Drugs harming women. Mirena IUD Class Action lawyers are currently reviewing cases for a Mirena IUD Class Action, MDL Lawsuit. If you have a perforated uterus from the Mirena IUD contact us today for a case review.

Birth control drugs and devices have been the central focus of lawsuits. Yaz, Yasmin, Beyaz, NuvaRing and the related Vaginal Mesh are just some of the birth control medications, devices and related women problem devices that are causing injuries, death and destroying lives.
The Mirena IUD is being currently reviewed by our Mirena IUD lawyers. Mirena is manufactured by Bayer ,which also manufacturers Yaz and Beyaz. It is a flexible silicone intrauterine device that is placed into the uterus through the vagina by a physician. Mirena releases a continuous dose of the hormone levonorgestrel to prevent pregnancy for up to five years.

The first-generation IUD Dalkon Shield was well known for its complications, including :infection, sepsis, miscarriage and even death. Ther Over 300,000 IUD Dalkon Shield lawsuits were filed.

The problems Mirena IUD lawyers are accepting Mirena Silicone IUD cases for include puncture of the uterus or the device becoming firmly embedded in the uterus. This can cause bleeding and other serious complications. The device must have moved or gravitated, and can not be located. If you have had the device surgically removed we want to hear from you.

The vaginal mesh lawsuit trials are underway. Lawyers are beginning the depositions of key players. The clock is ticking File you vaginal mesh lawsuit now.

Cases based on defective or dangerous pharmaceutical drugs or medical devices are frequently filed by our class action lawyers as personal injury class action lawsuits. This is based on an argument that the drug or device was defective or unreasonably dangerous.. Pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, and health care providers have a duty to appropriately research, test, and use these products. There is strict criteria from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Our class action Lawyers have filed cases based on defective or dangerous pharmaceutical drugs or medical devices such as Actos,prolapse mesh,Avandia, Depuy hip replacement,Zimmer Duram cup,Accutane and Zyprexa. These include lawsuits for injuries caused by dangerous prescription drugs, improperly prescribed medicines, defective surgical implants, and faulty medical equipment.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by any of the pharmaceutical drugs or orthopedic devises mentioned above call Injury lawyer network to speak to an experienced class action litigator. 1 877.522.2123

Direct General Insurance Agency: Direct General Insurance Agencies, also known as Cash Register and Florida No Fault, have been issuing life insurance and ancillary coverages through Lloyds of London when people go in to buy car insurance. In some instances people don’t even know that they buy these types of insurances. If you are insured by Direct General Insurance Company or bought a policy at Direct General Insurance Agency, you may be entitled to compensation.

Class Action Lawyer Network may be able to help you with financial harm caused by Insurance Fraud amd denial of insurance claims. Insurance Fraud lawsuits can result from damages inflicted by unfair, or “bad faith” insurance claim denials. No matter how you were harmed by an insurance company, we want to help you. Call our Insurance Claims Hotline

If you feel you were victimized by an insurance company who did not pay your claims or presented a policy they in fact could not or did not stand behind cntact our Insurance Fraud claims Helpline Today. Bad-Faith Lawyer,Coverage Dispute lawyer, Denial of Coverage lawyer, Fire Insurance lawyer, Flood Insurance Cases, Life Insurance Cases Disability Cases, Storm Damage Cases, Hurricane Damage Cases, Theft Cases, and Sinkhole Cases are our experience. We will fight against insurance companies for your rights. You may be entitled to damages for your calim denial due to fraud or bad faith,