Category Archives: Ideology

Israeli strikes against Syria and its army are not new. It is rather a tradition that began in the late 1990s with strikes against Syrian army locations and radars in Lebanon. These strikes shifted to the inside of the country after the war in Iraq through attacks on sensitive targets in the Syrian interior, down to direct and repeated assaults since 2012, and the intensification of the war which has exhausted the national army and weakened its defenses.

After each strike, Arab voices emerge rebuking the Syrian regime over Israel’s attacks against it and the lack of response on its part. It is as if these assaults were a war on the regime itself, rather than a war on Syria, and as if it is shameful to be targeted by Israel, rather than to ally and cooperate with it. Continue reading On Syria and ‘the right to respond’ to Zionist aggression→

The recent November 27, 2014 guilty ruling by Justice Wendy Matheson in the defamation lawsuit against Sun News Network’s Zionist Jew propagandist Ezra Levant by Khurrum Awan a Muslim Canadian lawyer came for many as a surprise and a grave disappointment.

What this reflects for those caught up in the deceptive rhetoric of Ezra Levant and his background support network of international Jewry (and those not), is that there are within that sector of people paying attention to Canadian and global politics, two schools of thought when it comes to the issue of freedom of speech or expression; one that sees Levant as the leading spokesperson for freedom of speech and another which views his actions or behaviour as that of the proverbial Trojan Horse – interposed within the Jew media monopoly in order to serve the needs, not of Canada, but of the Israeli agenda which, ultimately, means the ideology of Zionism. Continue reading KARMA: Ezra Levant, Zionism & the Politics of Deception→

The Palestinian left is hostage to the bipolar political division in Palestine. The left has been unable to become a sizeable force compared to other factions, or develop an independent identity in the political equation post-Oslo.

We shed light on the reality of the left in Palestine in light of the dominance of Fatah and Hamas over the political landscape, and the fact that their policy choices of negotiations and resistance respectively, have reached an impasse or a state of uncertainty coupled with limited options.

Gaza – The new generation in the Arab region almost knows no other players in Palestine other than Fatah and Hamas, the two constantly sparring factions, while the name of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad comes to the fore from time to time during Israeli wars and retaliations. Beyond these three names, there is almost no voice for the Palestinian left-wing factions, though they had initiated resistance against Israeli occupation, long before the Islamists. Continue reading The Palestinian left straddled between Fatah’s ‘paradise’ and Hamas’ ‘fire’→

While an exceedingly detailed refutation could be written to counteract Cooper’s smears, there are only two points that will be addressed here. Firstly, Cooper seems exceedingly incensed that Atzmon doesn’t kowtow to the Jewish-leftist-driven narrative that Zionism is not in fact a unique brand of colonial domination and is merely an extension of what “The Left” calls “white supremacy” and “Christian imperialism”.

A simple grouping of questions for Mr. Cooper: Did the terrorist French regime set up an exclusivist “French state” in Algeria, Vietnam, Burkina Faso, Syria or Lebanon? What about the murderous British? Did the Crown ever declare Iraq, India, Kenya, Ghana or Hong Kong to be “the national homeland of the British people”? And what about genocidal Portugal? Was there a “Portuguese and democratic state” that came to fruition in Brazil, Mozambique or Angola? Of course not. Based on this premise alone, the usurping Zionist entity is undoubtedly a unique colonial project as it represents the evisceration of one culture and people — the Palestinians and Arabs more generally — and their subsequent replacement with another — the Jews — based on absurd, rewritten claims in the Jewish Bible. In other words, the engine which moves the Jewish supremacist colonization vehicle in Palestine is genocide justified by a Jewish cultural and quasi-religious doctrine.

The second and arguably more critical point to be made is that Cooper attacks Atzmon’s intellectual integrity by declaring he got his facts wrong about “pro-Palestine” groups IJAN and Jewish Voice For Peace (JVP). First Cooper quotes Atzmon: “If you are a Gentile (non-Jew), you cannot really join a Jewish anti-Zionist cell, because you are not racially qualified.” And then Cooper writes: “This is factually wrong — both groups have non-Jewish members.”

But in reality, it is Cooper who is factually incorrect. While anyone can technically become a “member” of JVP by simply joining its mailing list, when it comes down to who’s who and what’s what, we ponder, who’s running the show? In other words, to use Gilad’s phrase, who controls the “Jewish anti-Zionist cell” known as JVP? (Information on who is running the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network [IJAN] could not be found oddly enough, or then again, maybe not so odd at all, as the organization most likely doesn’t want people to know its own Jewish-racialist-tribalist exclusive agenda)

So there it is. Gilad Atzmon stands vindicated and Nick Cooper is left with kosher egg on his face. JVP is run by Jews from top to bottom, without a single non-Jew to speak of. And as Gilad wrote, one cannot “really join” JVP and have a role on its board or in its leadership if one isn’t a Jew. Is this “hafrada”, this separation of Jew and Gentile, not the essence of Zionism, thus vindicating Atzmon’s categorization of these persons as anti-Zionist Zionists, i.e. Jews masquerading as anti-Zionists all for the sake of preserving Jewish interests and the illegitimate, baby-killing “Israeli” regime itself?

The Palestinian cause is a liberationist cause rooted in justice and righteousness and it has no place for persons such as JVP who inhibit the discourse and who are quite literally acting as Zionism’s thought police. As I noted in my Al-Quds anthem “Unstoppable March (Original Qibla)” off my new album “Enemy of the Entity”, a record dedicated to the beautiful people of Palestine and their precious cause, “We don’t need ‘leftist’ ‘Israelis’ or the Jewish Voice for ‘Peace’/Pretenders who say they’re our friends but don’t support our liberationist ends, yeah, that is stupid noise to me/We can see the scam from a mile away, we ain’t gonna act as their foolish goys or sheep/” It’s worth repeating: Gilad Atzmon stands vindicated and Jewish Voice for Peace is nothing but a front for Jewish supremacy, the very antithesis of the Palestinian cause and all it represents.

The Jewish activist Max Blumenthal wrote an expansive book on Israeli racism, but he failed completely and categorically to grasp the culture that drives Jewish supremacy within the Jewish State, Jewish politics and beyond. Interestingly enough, Blumenthal has a lot to say about ‘German pathology,’ German people, the colour of German people’s skin and their ‘sickening society’. If anyone still had hope that there was something positive that Progressive Jews could add to the discourse, Blumenthal’s latest interview will end that idea. He exhibits the ultimate form of Jewish racism, goy hatred: in fact, far more insidious than hard-core right wing Zionism. Continue reading The Pathology of Max Blumenthal→

Hip-hop as an art form and a culture is hands down one of the most powerful international social forces in the history of the world. There is no nation on Earth where its footprints cannot be found. Rap artists who create the soundtrack that fuels hip-hop culture become equally influential. They determine trends and the general course of youth culture globally. Yet while it appears these artists who often peddle images of invincibility are in control of hip-hop, we must look deeper to see who may be in control of them.

Rap artist, Jay-Z and his business partner Damon Dash built a hip-hop powerhouse called Roc-a-fella Records. It was a Black-owned Record label that produced millions in sales. As is often the case, these two brothers reportedly had personal and business disagreements and decided to part ways. Legend has it that a Def Jam Records executive by the name of Lyor Cohen played the role of instigator, negotiator and “clean-up” businessman. What is clear is that Roc-a-Fella Records, once known as “The Dynasty”, is now owned by Def Jam. Cohen happens to be Jewish. Continue reading The Secret Relationship Between Rappers and Jews→

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Salute to brother Joshua Blakeney for tipping me off to this wonderful piece of information. All in all, it’s an absolutely fascinating and groundbreaking work that shatters the mainstream narrative on Japan’s motivations during World War II within the first few paragraphs. However, Professor Aydin still used the phrases “Japanese imperialism” and “Japan’s colonial subjects” throughout. And I just am not convinced that this language reflects historical accuracy. If there was support for Japan’s Pan-Asianism and these Asian nations welcomed Japan into their lands as a defense against the very real threat of Western-Jewish colonialism, then that is quite the opposite of imperialism, isn’t it? What we seem to have in Japan’s case is akin to Hizbullah intervening in Syria to defend its ally or covertly entering Palestine to train the Palestinian Resistance; Iran going into Iraq to help Iraqis fight the US-Zionist occupation or now, ISIS; Cuba sending doctors, teachers and other professionals into Venezuela to build up the latter’s social structure; Nasser sending Egyptian forces into South Yemen to fight the US-Zionist-Saudi project; Putin’s Russia taking back Crimea at the Crimean people’s behest to stop NATO expansionism and aiding the United Armed Forces of Novorossiya against the illegal Kiev coup regime; etc, etc, etc. Japan’s like-similar actions are exactly what they appear to be: Defensive, anti-colonialist Pan-Asianism. The next step in the process of registering the redemption of WW2-Japan — a glorious civilizational entity to say the least — in the minds of the globe’s awakened ones, is to find out, in-depth, how the nations Japan entered felt about its entry. If the answers are what we think they are after reading this piece and a plethora of other works, then the story of “Japanese imperialism” and “Japanese colonialism” is a pernicious historical myth as Jewish as the “Nazi gas chambers”. ~ Jonathan Azaziah)Continue reading Revisionist Gem: Japan’s Pan-Asianism and the Legitimacy of Imperial World Order, 1931–1945→

With so much turmoil and confusion cast onto the collective psyche of our world in general, one of the most sacred acts one can endeavor to embark upon is the Jihad. In the Arab and Islamic worlds, this one act has been grossly misrepresented, misunderstood and falsely as well as perniciously portrayed by the Jewish constructs of Hollywood, the Public ‘School System’, Book Publishing Companies, ‘Mainstream Media’, Western politicians and a host of other sundry groups and individuals who subversively operate under the auspices of ‘information’. There is indeed an intentionally skewed usage of what the true definition of the Jihad is, meant to further the hegemonic agenda of International Zionism. Having been exposed to Arab/Muslim peoples for a good portion of my life, this humble writer from an Indigenous background (Plains Cree, Blackfeet, Missouria, Choctaw) and having been involved in quite a few of my own tribal traditional ceremonies and ways, I would like to share a brief personal observation on the Jihad and its parallel in the Horse Cultures – i.e. Great Plains – The Crying For A Vision, or what the Lakota people refer to as the “Han’blech’ ya”. We refer to it in layman’s terms as “Going on the Hill”. One of the Seven Sacred Rites given to the Great Plains Pnaci people by Pte Stan Win (White Buffalo Calf Woman). Continue reading Muslim-Pnaci CoResistance: The Parallels Between Jihad and Indigenous Spirituality→