‘Top chemists’ 2000-2010

Share

Copy the link

Just when we thought we could breathe easily without trying to rank how great people are, we find that The Times Higher Education has a story out today that features some ISI/Thomson Reuters data on who the ‘highest impact’ chemists were from 2000-2010.

Feel free to read neither this post nor the THE article and go straight to the table in this PDF.

The data given is all from ISI/Web of Science: papers published, citations and ‘impact’ (citations per paper). I’ll give you the top ten here:

We do have a note of caution, however: we’ve tried to reproduce the results ourselves in Web of Science, but can never get quite the same numbers out. Maybe our WoS skills aren’t quite up to those of the analyst who produced them.

Anyway, it’s moderately interesting to see this and note a few points of interest (Richard Smalley’s doing well, all things considered; no Stoddart?) but I’m not sure if it tells us anything earth-shattering.

The ISI release was spinning something along the lines of a nano-takeover (“60 out of the top 100 chemists identifying nanotechnology as either their main focus or a significant research topic”), while the THE article gives the RSC a bit of a soapbox (“[RSC chief exec] warned the EPSRC against squeezing out blue-skies research”).

I’ll leave it to you guys to have a good look and tell us what trends/datapoints you find interesting.

This community is not edited and does not necessarily reflect the views of Nature Research. Nature Research makes no representations, warranties or guarantees, whether express or implied, that the content on this community is accurate, complete or up to date, and to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability is excluded.