Search

(A note: while I recognize that sexual assaults happen to both women and men, I use the gender pronouns I do because rape is, indeed, a gendered epidemic that affects an overwhelming majority of women. If you disagree, all you have to do is look at the statistics; if you want to discuss pronouns regarding rape survivors, we can do it at another time, but not here and not now.)

Those of you who have known me for any extended period of time know one of the central tenets of my feminism – and one of my life’s passions, is to end rape culture. This is because of the women in my life who have been affected, and because of the many others in my life who could could be affected. I’ve sat and cried with a date as she told her story; I’ve seen first-hand when friends go through flashbacks, and I continue to be touched by the impact of sexual assaults everyday.

This, then, may seem a bit different coming from me. While I do not deny rape statistics nor do I doubt that there are survivors of sexual assaults who have chosen not to report the incidences, what I do take issue with is whether it is appropriate for the feminist movement to label rape what many women might consider bad sexual experiences.

With an understanding of rape culture and survivors’ reluctance to report incidences for fear they might not be believed, as well as a lack of support for survivors in many communities and the stigma that often comes with being a victim of sexual assault, my question is: are we silencing women and using their lived experiences for our cause when we cite statistics of unreported rape cases? Do we have the right to decide whether a woman’s personal experiences is rape when she does not consider it such?

Sexual intimacy and consent, despite of what we might believe with every fiber of our beings as feminist, isn’t a black-and-white issue; these issues are often complicated, based on personal and sexual experiences, as well as desire and other factors. Yet, we’ll continue to go by the hard definition of rape, citing unreported statistics, using the experiences of many women for our cause, while they themselves might not consider themselves such. In short, we victimize many with non-positive sexual experiences rather than giving them the agency to decide for themselves whether their experiences is considered rape.

From a perspective of activism and theoretical framework, I understand the allure of doing such – it helps our cause, and given the especially multiple layers of cultural practices and social norms that define what we call “rape culture,” our definition of “rape” most definitely fits into these experiences. I liken this to something else I see all the time: the military’s definition of “progress” as seen in our two theaters of operation. But what we see as “progress” might not be such, and it is up to the individual local nationals to decide whether their lives have progressed.

The same thing applies here: women’s lived and sexual experiences are not ours to define, nor are they ours to use to our political advantage. Yet, time and again, we use these definitions without giving them a second thought – thereby denying women of the voices they deserve. Not every sexual experience will be a positive one; yet, not every non-positive experience is rape either. In the end, our focus should be on ending rape culture, and focusing more on attending to survivors, to ensure they get the justice and emotional closure they deserve.

Fudging numbers and casting wide definitions of what constitutes rape won’t help us end rape culture — what will help us, though, is actually listening to women and honoring all their choices, to include not labeling negative sexual experiences as rape

Disclaimer: This post was written by a Feministing Community user and does not necessarily reflect the views of any Feministing columnist, editor, or executive director.

For the past few months, I’ve seen several articles — almost exclusively writtenbywhite women — arguing that we shouldn’t enforce Title IX protections for survivors of sexual assault because the authors believe Black men are more likely to be accused. The narrative has been picked up by numerous media outlets and used by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to strip protections for survivors.

The idea that survivors’ rights are a threat to Black men leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Let me be clear: that’s not because I’m not worried about race discrimination in school discipline. We have no data to support the argument that Black men are more likely to be accused of or ...

For the past few months, I’ve seen several articles — almost exclusively writtenbywhite women — arguing that we shouldn’t enforce Title IX protections for survivors of sexual assault because the authors ...

Early this week, Democratic candidate for Michigan’s Attorney General Position, Dana Nessel, released a provocative ad for election campaign asking: which candidate do you trust most not to show you their penis in a professional setting?

Nessel’s answer is, on its face, simple: the candidate you can trust the most to not flash you their dick is the candidate that doesn’t have one. Therefore, you should vote for her — and support the idea of an “all-female ticket” for the Michigan Democrats in 2018, with a push for women to serve as the State’s Senator, Governor, Attorney General and Secretary of State.

Butthere’s a crucial point Nessel misses: no men in elected offices doesn’t mean that there will be no people with ...

Early this week, Democratic candidate for Michigan’s Attorney General Position, Dana Nessel, released a provocative ad for election campaign asking: which candidate do you trust most not to show you their penis in a professional setting?

In law school, we spend a lot of time thinking about the “theory of the case”: what’s the problem, who’s the victim, who’s the villain. It turns out that how you define the problem directly informs the kind of solution that a judge, a lawmaker, or, say, the readers of the New York Times, are primed to accept.

The fast-moving national reckoning over sexual harassment in the workplace toppled another television news star on Wednesday . . .

The downfall of Mr. Lauer, a presence in American living rooms for more than 20 years, adds to a head-spinning string of prominent firings over sexual harassment and abuse allegations.

Here’s

In law school, we spend a lot of time thinking about the “theory of the case”: what’s the problem, who’s the victim, who’s the villain. It turns out that how you define the problem directly informs the kind of ...

Search

We need your help!

Get Our Newsletter

New posts and Feministing news delivered to your inbox weekly!

Want to write for us?

All Feministing posts are written by the site’s collective of regular columnists and editors. Though we don’t currently accept guest submissions, we have an open platform Community site to which anyone can contribute. We often promote our favorite Community posts on the main site. And Community bloggers who consistently impress us may to be invited to become regular Feministing columnists..