Also check the page where you found the patch carefully.
Sometimes you can find an updated ebuild that works with
that patch in the same page, so you don't have to patch it
yourself.
You need to examine the patch and clear up whether it's
a patch for the app or for the ebuild itself. If it's

On 28 June 2010 15:40, justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
The patch was borked. Either bump to latest sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 or
resync later. It is fixed now.
Thanks, will have another go.
--
Regards,
Mick

[snip]
Am I making any sense?
I think all of that is right on. I need to find out why the patch
isn't working though.
Theoretically (if you insist), you could still use the perl's
Text::Patch route as well, but (if I'm not entirely wrong, see the
excerpted attempted patch run above

Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
OK,
So what is wrong with this patch:
What is the error message? :)
What I normally do is: unpack the affected tarball, copy the
affected files to .orig versions, make the necessary changes,
create a patch from above the topdir with 'diff -u' between the
orig

Is there a patch file to patch mkisofs to use the --duplicates-once
option during generation of iso9960/UDF images?
The problem is that the one that exists right now, the patch (against
the official sources) cannot be found because the original site
(bootcd.ru) is permanently down.
Or do I need

Title: how to patch the asterisk ebuild
Hi all,
somebody know how to patch the software via ebuild. i need to patch the asterisk.1.2.13 in part of chan_sip.c for correct the silencesupp in the huawei softswitch. but i dont know how to correct in the ebuild
Thanks,
kitti
huawei.patch

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:57:56 -0700 (PDT), Leonardo wrote:
I'm trying to apply a patch from gentoo bugzilla on a ebuild
that's in portage, but cannot find infos on how to do it.
If you are trying to patch the ebuild itself:
Download the patch file
cd to the directory containing the ewbuild

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Jim John wrote:
Hi. I want to patch cyrus-imapd. I have the diff file, but no source
because I emerged from the repository. How do I get the source and
ebuild it? Thanks.
The best way to do this is to modify the ebuild to apply the patch.
Copy

This is a bug. Please file one at bugs.gentoo.org.
The patch which is missing got removed with the latest version bump of glpk
but it is still referred to from the ebuild of version 4.45.
--
Regards
Daniel

Andrey Vul wrote:
Is there a patch file to patch mkisofs to use the --duplicates-once
option during generation of iso9960/UDF images?
The problem is that the one that exists right now, the patch (against
the official sources) cannot be found because the original site
(bootcd.ru

* Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-17 04:40]:
- is it possible to patch the gentoo-sources kernel with the suspend2
patch? Or will it only apply cleanly to a vanilla kernel?
I patched my standard gentoo kernel this way:
http://onyon.net/index.php/2005-02

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:23:31 +0200, Eray Aslan wrote:
You'll just have to keep an eye for upgrades, because they
will probably come without this patch. If you want this patch to be
included in postfix create a bug in bugzilla with the request.
I don't think it is a good idea. I would

Looks like a good patch but can you link to instructions for applying
this patch?
Fabio Scaccabarozzi wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> That is expected with 4.10 kernels.
> You can grab a patch from my /etc/portage repository:
> https://github.com/fsvm88/gentoo-portage_etc/blob/master/p

Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
I applied a patch to korganizer to fix kde bug
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113376
I then rearchive kdepim-3.4.92.tar.bz2
Do not change tarballs.
Instead, put the kdepim-3.5.0_beta2.ebuild in your overlay, add the
patch to it with PATCHES=${FILESDIR

/trunk/README
Ok, I see they're shipping the same version which is available from
CPAN as the dev version (2.00.99_3). But the patch is still not made
for its code ... maybe it is for _2 or _1?
The patch keeps failing out of the box:
cpan -i Text::Patch
tar xvzf Typemap.tar.gz
tar xvzf

On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 20:31 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
Thanks for the info, but I notice that there's also a patch to
portage.py attached to the bug. Is it correct to just patch it with the
standard patch -p1 blah blah blah (patch syntax doesn't roll
trippingly off my typing finger, but I'll

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:56:17 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
Hi I was reading the bug report 114915 at gentoo bugzilla and it
mentions a patch to ebuid, I had downloaded the patch but I don't have
any clue about how can I apply it to current ebuid.
As root:
cd /usr/portage/x11-libs/gtkDPS

Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's what
this means.
Or am

Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's

Somewhere in this thread was a mention of a failed patch.
Where version of patch are you using? If it's 2.6, downgrade it as 2.6 is
horribly broken
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/12/01/gentoo-service-announcement-keep-clear-of-
gnu-patch-2-6
There was some patching things that caught my

David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to
work clean. I thought you got it working before when you posted the
patched Typemap for me to download. Did it work then but not now?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621
- GrantSOAP-WSDL
The patched Typemap

On Wednesday 26 October 2005 17:27, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
OK,
So what is wrong with this patch:
What is the error message? :)
What I normally do is: unpack the affected tarball, copy the
affected files to .orig versions, make the necessary changes,
create

On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:31 +0200, Fabrice Delliaux wrote:
Hi,
Explanation patch here :
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-libtool@gnu.org/msg00838.html
I saved the patch at the above link to /root/libtool.patch, but I can't
figure out how to use it. I assume that I would need to navigate

I've been unsuccessfully trying to build the latest security patch
version of Firefox 3.0. I keep getting the same error message after
3 days of re-syncing and retrying. The build dies early on in the
patch-appliaction stage, so log.txt is small. The error message also
mentioned to include

patch here :
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-libtool@gnu.org/msg00838.html
I saved the patch at the above link to /root/libtool.patch, but I can't
figure out how to use it. I assume that I would need to navigate to a
directory and say patch /root/libtool.patch, but what directory do

On Tue, 8 May 2007 17:56:36 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
Ok, but, what is the content of net_dev.patch?
It's right there in your original mail:
[...]
That IS what the patch file looks like. It will alter your Makefile,
and the epatch function

On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 08:56 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
Hi I was reading the bug report 114915 at gentoo bugzilla and it
mentions a patch to ebuid, I had downloaded the patch but I don't have
any clue about how can I apply it to current ebuid.
well, how confident are you at having a go

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:05:21PM +, Renat Lumpau wrote:
I've attached a patch to the eclass that removes the user-visible warning
about
manual SLOTting. Unless there are strong objections, I plan to commit this
patch
to the tree in a week.
In the tree.
--
Renat Lumpau all

Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a patch file to patch mkisofs to use the --duplicates-once
option during generation of iso9960/UDF images?
There is no such option.
Could you explain your desire?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin

Howdy,
With Holly's praise of fvwm-crystal I thought I'd give it a try.
But then I hit bug 89594 with aumix. The sound team provided
a patch, aumix-2.8-autoconf.patch, which will create the two
missing config files (they didn't fix the ebuild because it works
on their systems). Now I'm trying

Hi I was reading the bug report 114915 at gentoo bugzilla and it
mentions a patch to ebuid, I had downloaded the patch but I don't have
any clue about how can I apply it to current ebuid.
I had searched gentoo wiki and found nothing. Does some gentle soul
can help me with this stupid question

Hi I was reading the bug report 114915 at gentoo bugzilla and it
mentions a patch to ebuid, I had downloaded the patch but I don't have
any clue about how can I apply it to current ebuid.
There may be a patched version already in portage, still masked.
If there isn't you may consider creating

On 10/21/06, Kitti Jaisong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
somebody know how to patch the software via ebuild. i need to patch the
asterisk.1.2.13 in part of chan_sip.c for correct the silencesupp in the
huawei softswitch. but i dont know how to correct in the ebuild
You need

Hi,
i attached a patch. See comments #70 and #72 of this bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149307
from where i got it, and so on ...
It fixes the sandbox violations with vanilla 2.6.19 kernel.
It will be included in 2.6.20 kernel, as it seems. But it's not in
2.6.19.1 :-(
I thought

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:42:31 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Post it on Bugzilla. If the maintainer likes your patch he'll add it
to the tree. If not, anyone else searching Bugzilla will find it.
Somebody already posted the patch to the driver to Bugzilla.
Should I also post the patch

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, David Abbott wrote:
Here is the patch to fix totem-pl-parser with the new quvi api
https://386651.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=289447action=diffcollapsed=context=patchformat=rawheaders=1
HTH
David
Thank you. I follow that bug and know about the patch. Since I

»Q« boxc...@gmx.net [12-02-14 18:12]:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:58:49 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
How can I circumvent the problem?
I can't vouch for it, but there's a patch attached to the bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372003
Hi,
thank you for your help

It looks like i have hit this gcc 4.7 build bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
Theres a patch attached to the bug i'd like to apply. Unfortunately the gcc
4.7.2 ebuild doesnt have epatch_user, so i need to take the other
approach listed in the handbook. It suggests i use

Hello Meino,
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
[..]
>WHOW! Thanks a lot for the patch!
As this issue has just come up on gentoo-dev as well, has the patch
worked for you (so far)? Please give a report if it worked or not.
I've been unable to run/test my system with that pa

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's trying to install dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.2. I went back and sort
> of started from the start. Figured out where I made a boo boo. Now it
> tries to apply the patch but fails to apply

I've set the ebuild up in an overlay and added:
epatch ${FILESDIR}/qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff
to the ebuild alongside other patches, but the patch always fails with this:
^[[31;01mACCESS DENIED^[[0m rename:
/usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.1-r1.ebuild
patch: Can't rename file
/var

it out but a LOT of files
are not where patch thinks they should be, so I did not even attempt to
build it.
Files should be there... you're using the correct -p flag for patch? I
guess you'd having problems anyway if you're using the (already heavily
patched) gentoo-kernel. Why not start

Renat Golubchyk mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can copy the ebuild to your overlay and patch postfix from there.
If you don't have to do anything else before compiling it then it's as
trivial as epatch /path/to/postfix.patch somewhere in src_unpack().
Doing it this way has the benefit

/net_dev.patch?¿?
You list two patches.
The one for the ebuild you should apply to the ebuild manually
using 'patch', but you seem to have successfully done that already.
Yep,
Then copy the first patch (net_dev.patch)
Ok, but, what is the content of net_dev.patch? if I put:
# cat files

Hi list,
just now my Acer TM2313 is emerging system at home. If I return home
from work I plan to complete the installation.
My question: Is gentoo-sources patched with the acpi_sbs patch or will I
need to get it somewhere and patch it myself?
Googling around I found (on the Gentoo forum

, you will find a src_unpack() function, and a couple of lines
that look like this:
export EPATCH_SUFFIX=patch
epatch ${PATCHDIR}/general
if use oav ; then
...
fi
So after the fi line, add a new line to tell portage to apply your
patch. Something like

On 9/16/06, David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I recently noticed a keyboard problem (ctrl left arrow moves a word to
the _right_ when using the numeric keypad) and now have a patch for
GTK, specifically file gtk+-2.8.19/gtk/gtktextview.c.
What's the best way to create

:
http://code.google.com/p/google-api-adwords-perl/source/browse/trunk/README
Ok, I see they're shipping the same version which is available from
CPAN as the dev version (2.00.99_3). But the patch is still not made
for its code ... maybe it is for _2 or _1?
The patch keeps failing out

I could have sworn there was a way to specify a patch to be applied to
an emerge from the command line, something like:
EPATCH=file.patch emerge packagename
I've been searching Google and the mailing list but I can't find
mention of it anywhere. Was it a figment of my imagination?
- Grant

Mike Kenny wrote:
* sys-libs/db
Latest version available: 4.2.52_p2
Latest version installed: 4.2.52_p2
which indicates that I have the latest version. Is there somewhere else
I should be looking?
The 4.2.52_p2-r1 contains that patch and is stable on most arches, what
arch

hi,
I just wanted to ask whether someone on the List has experiences with the Realtime Preemption patches by Ingo Molnar
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/
applied to the gentoo-kernel. I have just tried it out but a LOT of
files are not where patch thinks they should be, so I

Hey!
I just found out that this is a bug in kernel 2.6.19
(http://linuxforen.de/forums/showthread.php?t=230939) and no patches
have been offered yet. So if anyone knows a patch for this issue, it
would be nice if you could offer a link to the patch.
Cheers,
Jay
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org

On 5/22/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Richard. Those steps did the trick. And the author's
correction fixed the problem also.
Cool. If upstream is going to apply the patch to a future release
that may be some weeks off, you might consider filing a bug report

I have tried that ebuild (with patch) and got linking error shown below.
most i can say is that it works on my x86 box (gcc-3.3.6,binutils-2.16.1-r2).
(the patch is not needed to apply; ebuild will do.)
many reasons possible why linker doesnt find the reference and i'm not
going to debug

Bo Ørsted Andresen:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150495
I've attached a patch for the ebuild on the bug that although not
excactly optimal it works for me.
Thanks! Now I've just to understand how to emerge an ebuild with a new
patch ;-)))
Sergio
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing

On 6/22/06, ellotheth rimmwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have it and I find no references in the net
Just for reference, here's the search (Google) I used:
last exit last.fm save-song patch
--
ellotheth rimmwen
* monjoy *
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Hi. I want to patch cyrus-imapd. I have the diff file, but no source because I emerged from the repository. How do I get the source and ebuild it? Thanks. __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http

Greetings,
I recently noticed a keyboard problem (ctrl left arrow moves a word to
the _right_ when using the numeric keypad) and now have a patch for
GTK, specifically file gtk+-2.8.19/gtk/gtktextview.c.
What's the best way to create a personalized ebuild to include this fix
when I build

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:09:06 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
There was a patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to make it
work with 2.6.33.
Can you give a link please? I'm having trouble compiling nvidia-drivers
with 2.6.33 and I can't see much on the nvidia site.
emerge --sync

On 06/30/2010 02:52 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
aka the dark underside of source-based systems :-)
Anyone who uses gentoo had better get an erotic thrill out of filing
bug reports, or better yet, a patch that makes into portage, or more
erotic still, a patch that makes it into upstream.
I'm now

Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support?
Googling the mailinglist archives, it was said that the previous
implementation had vulns and was hence scrapped, but it sucks not
having it.
There are unofficial forks of mplayer which have id3v2, but there's no
ebuild, in layman

Do any of the gentoo kernels have the badram patch? - just found a 2G
stick with one stuck bit :(
Googling for this shows activity up to 2.6.28 - then nothing. Did it
get included in the kernel?
Otherwise its roll my own ...
BillK

I'll assume for the moment that the hardened-sources patch set
discussed includes security improvements.
My question is...what kinds? For what reason is there a set of makes
it more secure patches that aren't integrated into the mainline
kernel? Are they just not stable in some fashion? Do

BTW postfix 2.9.0 also fails to emerge if USE=vda because it tried
to apply the patch for 2.8.5. (patch for 2.9.0 has not yet been
released)
And it also fails to start if have maps in hash format and emerge with
USE=-berkdb.
Luckily the error messages are informative enough... but let's say

On 07/03/2012 19:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/07/12 10:24, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
when this patch is going to get into the portage??
thanks
Eliezer
It looks like Eray applied it to postfix-2.10_pre20120305-r1, in the
tree right now.
thanks
Eliezer

/work/kernel/nv-pat.o]
Error 1
I saw a topic about that problem on Gentoo forum :
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7754020.html?sid=3b9fed3069c0b6644c1a41e839455b85
I tried to apply the patch
/etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/nvidia-drivers-340.76.patch
*--- a/kernel/nv

Hi,
While compiling my new root, it fails again.
Here is the desription what happens...solution is
not to apply two of the patches of the ebuild.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605158
But...how can I do this more convenietly than
manually reversing the patchfiles?
Can I instruct

Hi.
This issue is really pissing me off, I have ried almost all the
fixes, even to the point of booting and copying a Stage3 tarball over
the running system and doing a Stage3 Install.
No matter what I do, and for almost ALL packages I get ..
* Portage patch failed to apply

Good to hear its working.But can someone tell me how to apply the patch?Thanks!~IanOn 1/22/06, James Colby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thanks for the link.I just gave in and re-enable arts for KDE.
Sound is working now.On 1/22/06, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is exactly what I am wanting to do

the patch proposed in the bug #116637?
Now (I think) I figured out how to patch it. Just copied the
portage-2.1_pre4-r1 to
an overlay, downloaded the patch to FILESDIR, added the following line to
src_unpack() and reemerged portage.
patch ${WORKDIR}/${PN}-${PV}/pym/elog_modules/mod_mail.py