Here's a hint for the Pac 12 refs: if a player is REALLY injured and not just faking it because they can't keep up with the offense, they dont roll around on the ground like a child in a sand box, repeatedly putting their weight on a possible injury. They lay prone not moving because movign makes it hurt. and if they are in such pain that they are writhing around on the ground,t hey aren't going to be ready to go in after one play off.

Special teams is directly responsible for 7 (I count 14) points today. Shouldn't have been down to begin with.

And the refs. OHHH goodness the refs. I believe it was in the 2nd quarter we had that filthy block on special teams called a personal foul. That was atrocious. As was their presence the entire first half the of the game.

|~=[==~||~==]=~| ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.

Holy shit. Why bother playing the game when the goddamn outcome is predetermined by the Pac 12? That so-called "official review" was ludicrous. What does it mean to be out of challenges, when the league has your frickin' back?!?

While I could very easily argue there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call, thus making it a bad call, I would bet anybody 100/1 that the ball hit the ground first, so I can't bring myself to complain about it.

The Huskies are the better team, I have no doubt, but made wayyyy too many mistakes. How many dumb penalties? How many drops? Four bad plays in the kicking game. Tonight was proof that no matter how incredible of a game you play, you can't beat a good team when you can't limit the mistakes.

It may have hit the ground but I didn't see enough evidence to overturn it. Even on a 60" plasma you could see ball but nothing to prove without a doubt that it touched.

And that's the problem they have to know for sure to overturn it and you can't say for 100% sure that it did touch. They got hosed.

If the ruling on the field originally was that it was dropped and then the replay came back saying it hit the ground that would have been fine. But the original call was a catch and there just wasn't enough proof to overrule the ruling on the field.

Msfann wrote:It may have hit the ground but I didn't see enough evidence to overturn it. Even on a 60" plasma you could see ball but nothing to prove without a doubt that it touched.

And that's the problem they have to know for sure to overturn it and you can't say for 100% sure that it did touch. They got hosed.

If the ruling on the field originally was that it was dropped and then the replay came back saying it hit the ground that would have been fine. But the original call was a catch and there just wasn't enough proof to overrule the ruling on the field.