I have explained in "Time to retire Islamism?" why I find the word "Islamism" unhelpfully vague. However it is quite clear that David Cameron is referring to ISIS and its ideology.

The speech was criticised by many Muslim organisations. In many cases I suspect they criticised the speech without having read it. That is clearly the case with the Muslim Council of Britain, which issued its press release before the speech had been delivered, in response to the newspaper headline in the Daily Mail "PM: UK Muslims helping jihadis" which is reproduced on the MCB website alongside the press release.

While I can understand the desire to be quick in the days of 24 hour news, in my opinion it is better to read what someone has said before commenting upon it.

Mohammed Amin: Cameron’s take on radicalisation is right

David Cameron’s speech last weekend in Bratislava was heavily trailed in the press. Sadly, but not surprisingly, Muslims were queuing up to criticise it – in many cases, I suspect, without waiting to read it.

What did the Prime Minister say?

It was a wide-ranging speech, covering Britain’s commitment to European security, our economic strength, our commitment to defence, our opposition to Russia’s attempt to redraw borders by force, Mediterranean migration, cyber-security and more. However, it was the comments about ISIS that upset many Muslim commentators.

Cameron summarised the problem as follows:

“Only if we are clear about this threat and its causes can we tackle it. The cause is ideological. It is an Islamist extremist ideology – one that says the West is bad and democracy is wrong that women are inferior, that homosexuality is evil. It says religious doctrine trumps the rule of law and Caliphate trumps nation state and it justifies violence in asserting itself and achieving its aims.

The question is: how do people arrive at this worldview?”

He acknowledged that there were multiple reasons. What clearly upset many people was the following: “I am clear that one of the reasons is that there are people who hold some of these views who don’t go as far as advocating violence, but who do buy into some of these prejudices giving the extreme Islamist narrative weight and telling fellow Muslims, ‘you are part of this’.”

He also challenged Muslims who seek to blame others for the causes of radicalisation:

“Too often we hear the argument that radicalisation is the fault of someone else. That blame game is wrong – and it is dangerous. By accepting the finger pointing – whether it’s at agencies or authorities – we are ignoring the fact that the radicalisation starts with the individual and we would be in danger of overlooking many of the ways we must try to stop it at the source.”

I found myself on LBC Radio yesterday debating with a Muslim woman who was clearly incensed by the Daily Mail headline; it was not clear if she had read the speech. The tabloids are rarely helpful with such delicate subject matter!

Was Cameron right?

To me, it is obvious that he was right.

From time to time, I encounter young Muslims who are completely alienated from our country and who can see nothing good about it. If I remained silent when listening to their lamentations, I would be tacitly supporting their sense of grievance; far worse of course were I to concur with them. That is the way to let them continue the slide towards adopting ISIS’s ideology. My duty to the young people themselves requires me to challenge their misconceived alienation and remind them, as Baroness Warsi has said, that Britain is probably the best country in the world in which to be a Muslim.

Unfortunately, there are people who don’t take this approach. The ComRes attitude survey of British Muslims published in February 2015 had some encouraging findings, but also some discouraging ones. For example 20 per cent of respondents agreed with the statement “Western liberal society can never be compatible with Islam.” There will be people who listen to young people’s lamentations and who tell them Britain really is as bad as they think.

When it comes to the radicalisation of children, the primary responsibility for preventing it rests with their parents. Everyone would be up in arms were the state to claim primary responsibility for the spiritual and moral upbringing of children; the previous sentence is only the same proposition in reverse. As a father of four children, I would spend the rest of my life wondering how I had failed as a parent were one of them to join ISIS.

Why do so many Muslims object to such common sense?

I believe the reason for the extreme defensiveness displayed arises from a lack of confidence regarding the status of Islam in Britain and other liberal societies. In my view, many Muslims fear that if they concede that Muslims who commit terrorism are in any way motivated by their understanding of Islam they will somehow have conceded that Islam is a religion which promotes terrorism. That is logical nonsense, but logic rarely rules with something as important as one’s relationship with one’s religion.

While the defensive concerns are not valid, they are amplified by the activities of anti-Muslim bigots who have made an industry out of promoting the view that the terrorists’ understanding of Islam is the correct one.

Readers comments

There were a number of comments from Conservative Home readers. They have since been deleted from the site due to housekeeping.

Some welcomed the piece, while others sadly treated it as yet another opportunity to criticise Islam. While that will always happen, it is not a reason for Muslims to refuse to acknowledge the unacceptable attitudes that are held by some British Muslims.

The Disqus comments facility below allows you to comment on this page. Please respect others when commenting.
You can login using any of your Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Disqus identities.
Even if you are not registered on any of these, you can still post a comment.

Everything on this site, other than comments made using the comments facility, is written by me in a personal capacity and should not be attributed to any organisation with which I may be associated. None of it constitutes professional advice, and no legal responsibility is accepted to anyone who acts, or refrains from acting, as a result of reading or watching anything posted on this site.

Comments made on this site using the comments facility are the responsibility of the individual comment authors. If you consider that any comment defames you, please email Mohammed Amin using the facility on the "Contact me" page, specifying the page, the comment author and the date and time of the comment, and the reasons it is defamatory so that the comment can be removed.

The ownership of this site is stated on the "Legal" page. Mohammed Amin is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.co.uk.