no title

Background checks would save some lives

Letters Policy

The Dispatch welcomes letters to the editor from readers. Typed letters of 200 words or
fewer are preferred; all might be edited. Each letter must include name, home address and daytime
phone number.
Dispatch.com also posts letters that don't make it to print in
The Dispatch.

To promote law and order, the U.S. Congress must enact universal background
checks for all gun sales in this country.

There were more than 11,000 firearm homicides in 2011 in this country, including an
unknown number of victims of domestic violence.

If universal background checks had been in place, the estranged husband of Zina
Haughton might not have been able to pass the background check and purchase a gun from a private
online gun seller and kill Haughton the next day with that gun.

A vote against universal background checks will result in continued violence
against women, children and men in this country.

There is no reason to vote against background checks based on the Second Amendment.
This is because the U.S. Supreme Court has made it clear that reasonable regulations on firearms
are permitted under the amendment.

Universal background checks are simply the logical method to try to prevent
criminals and mentally ill individuals from obtaining guns.

The Supreme Court has indicated that those current prohibitions on gun purchases
are valid under the Constitution.

There should be no further attempts to delay a Senate vote on the proposal. The
victims of Sandy Hook deserve a positive vote on the merits of the legislation.