"It is pathetic, it is ridiculous that you are allowed -- I don't care what the justification is, that you are allowed in this country to own a semi-automatic weapon, much less a handgun," Daily Beast columnist Buzz Bissinger said to Piers Morgan on his CNN program on Tuesday. "But what do you need a semi-automatic weapon for? The only reason I think you need it is, Piers, challenge Alex Jones to a boxing matc, show up with a semi-automatic that you got legally, and pop him."

After Bissinger made his bizarre suggestion, fellow guest Abbie Huntsman, daughter of John Huntsman, laughed and said said she "would love to see that."

Weird that Huntsman’s daughter would “love” to see somebody killed. The commie libs are really losing it. Abbie would have really “loved” being around when the Third Reich was doing their thing. Of course, she can still go to Red China and many Islamic countries to catch that gig.

3
posted on 01/08/2013 9:29:46 PM PST
by FlingWingFlyer
(Where can I pick up a 2013 Mayan calendar?)

I have NO doubt that Piss Morgan is a charter member of the
“it’s ok for me but not for thee” school of politics.....just
like Schumer and Fineswine want every one disarmed while
they pack heat with CCW’s in city’s where the peons could
NEVER get a permit. Liberal progtards cornered the market
in hypocrisy a LONG time ago.

As usual, you’re wrong buzz. You lost your radio show because you called Joe Paterno a “bu** fu***ng enabler” on the air - again wrong.

I guess you thought you were above the FCC, but hundreds of people wrote and e-mailed the FCC and went through the whole process (lengthy) to file claims against you. When asked about it, you laughed and said it would amount to “nothing.” You’re now laughing without a radio show. A**hole.

You’re just wrong. Always wrong. That must suck.

8
posted on 01/08/2013 9:52:00 PM PST
by FlJoePa
("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")

The discussion should have been stopped right there and this butt head bloak reminded that this is not a discussion about what he thinks we need but but a discussion about what our rights are under the US Constitution. What he thinks has absolutely no bearing on this conversation at all. The liberals want to argue their beliefs as if the words "need" and "rights" have the same meaning. We need to stop them and correct them each and every time. I do not care what they think we need I care deeply about our constitutional rights. What they think we need does not and has never determined our constitutional rights. In their arrogance they seem to always forget this fact.

SCREW THIS TRANSPLANTED LIBERAL!!!!! If he does not like what we are and how we do things here he can STFU and get the he11 out.

Sharon Tate and her fetus might have had a chance if she had a semi-automatic weapon with 30+ rounds in it and adequate training on how to use it. She was murdered along with her baby and 4 others in the residence by armed invaders sent by Charles Manson, who had guns and knives with them.

15
posted on 01/08/2013 11:07:24 PM PST
by entropy12
(The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)

All this proves is how gleefully willing the left is to kill their opposition in cold blood, once their opposition is unarmed.

Exactly. I told my family a LONG time ago, that the leftist, liberals actually want to kill conservatives. Guess they can say so publicly without retribution now. I can't believe the President doesn't come out and ask everyone to tone down the rhetoric.

18
posted on 01/09/2013 3:49:53 AM PST
by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)

"Former Tory MP George Walden was one of Britain's worst ever High Education Ministers. Since leaving Parliament he has earned a living writing pseudo-intellectual drivel about politics and culture. It's usually unreadable. I attended a discussion evening with him and his wife a couple of years ago, organised by Living Marxism. He was insufferable and spent the whole evening putting down his wife. In the Independent on Sunday diary there is a piece on his book The New Elites in which he slags off David Cameron for "being a posh man pretending to be common". Utter rubbish. But even if it were true, it's better than a pub bore pretending to be an intellectual.

The impression that I had from a brief look at Piers Morgan last night, was one of the complete self serving and cynical ploy. I have never been able to watch his whole show, by my spouse has it on.

In the absence of his guest, Morgan then set up that absent guest with a brief replay of one statement. That which most suited Morgan. He then had on two talking heads, who almost fell over themselves to agree with Morgan.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.