Thursday, October 29, 2015

Bible is totally man-made

There is no evidence to support the claim made by Christians that the Bible speaks about the true God. Bible is neither historical nor authentic;
but it is a collection of 66 books cobbled together by unconnected men of
antiquity who depended extensively on the myths and stories of their times,
spanning over 2000 years. There are more than enough contradictions and
falsehoods to prove that the Bible is not God-
inspired. Entire sections of the text have been redacted over time. We do not know about the authors and
there is no evidence or documental proof for the contents.

Where is the evidence for God’s love for humans?

He created men to torture them in hell for all
times, it seems. Immediately after the creation, He sends a test knowing very well they will fail and even assigns the wily serpent to tempt them. Later he made them suffer in every way. They take birth and die often like insects in the natural calamities like volcanic eruptions,earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and in plagues like cholera, small pox and famines. Horrendous diseases are hounding man –cancer, blood
pressure, heart attacks, diabetes- and they suffer the ordeal. There are
billions who cannot have a meal a day or a covering over their head. Man has
been in pain ever since his appearance here. If there is an omnipotent
ordaining the lives of man, He must be a monster who enjoys people's suffering and
dying like ants.

If there had been a real Jesus it does not prove anything at
all

The gospels are not historical documents but were written a
century or so after Jesus’ death in Greek -that was unknown to Jesus or his
disciples-and that too in places far away from where he is said to have lived and preached-by unknown preachers
who did not have any firsthand knowledge of the man at all. They were written after the Greek, Egyptian and
Roman gods who were born of virgins and who performed many miracles and who were killed and who rose up again and ascended
to heaven to sit at the right hand of their father.

Whatever they wrote were based on hearsay upon hearsay upon hearsay accounts of early Christians
who had started believing the Messiah had already come. Still
there are so many contradictions between the 4 gospels: the genealogy given by
Mark and Matthew do not match at all. There is the glaring Elijah controversy. The gospel writers know nothing about the
early years of his birth. The birth
stories, the census and references to Roman rulers are historically wrong.

For Mark, Luke an Matthew Jesus was a son of man but for John
he is the Almighty God himself.
There are many other mismatches between them. Mark, Luke and Matthew mention
only one Passover in his time but John mentions three. According to John his ministry lasted 3 years
but the synoptic gospels mention only one year’s public life. He is known as a Nazarene
although there was no mention of the town Nazareth in any document until the 4th
century! The gospel authors even invented his habitat!

The contemporary historians of Jesus’ time are totally
silent about him. There is no artifact, dwelling, self-written manuscript,
court record, eyewitness testimony, official diary, birth record, or book. Nothing survives from
the time in which he is said to have lived.

The New Testament, as a whole, contains many other internal inconsistencies as a result of its piecemeal construction. Like the Old Testament, it too had entire books and sections redacted. The Biblical account of Jesus has striking similarities with other mythologies and texts and many of his supposed teachings existed prior to his time. It is likely the character was either partly or entirely invented amalgamating the Greco-Roman, Egyptian mythical gods, their stories and prophecies.

Even if Jesus’ existence could be established, this would in
no way validate Christian theology or any element of the story portrayed in the
Bible, such as the performance of miracles or his resurrection. Simply because
it is conceivable a heretical Jewish preacher named Yeshua lived circa
30 AD, had followers and was executed, does not imply God himself walked around Palestine at that time.

The whole story of Jesus, the savior and the grand design of God breaks down
when we accept the story of evolution. If evolution is accepted there is no Adam and
eve; there is no first sin and there is no need for a grand design from God to save mankind
an there is no need for even the Bible itself or the Christian God.

1 comment:

I am not belittling any religion.But if there is no logic,it can not be believed.In Hindu scriptures there is ample room for criticism.People can accept or reject sermons!! Can believe or not believe.Semetic religions are dictating God's will on others,often give rice to suspicion about God's involvement in these sacred books.No God can be so cruel to his own creations !!