from page 6- Ruffian wrote-"For blue, you complain about people breeding and making the gene pool smaller, so what breeds are you crossing with Aussies to get minis (mutts)?"

Which was a response to me making an unbiased observation. I in no way indicated approval or disapproval of said practice.

From top of page 7- Ruffian wrote- "Nope not mob mentality honestly, didnt read most of this thread, I have disliked your breeding practices since I read the post where you said you are a mini aussie "breeder" (term used very loosely) just as I dislike a couple of other mutt breeders we have on-site."

Which was in response to me pointing out to her on page 6 that she was too busy jumping on the band wagon to bash me to realize that she yet again had misinterpreted my words when she claimed ,"mini aussies claims that because they come up as blue when you type Miniature Australian Shepherd on here that makes them a real breed, LMAO. Shiba Inu doesnt come up as blue and they are most definably a real breed, so I would never use that as my guide."

All I did was pose the question to the group... who determines legitimacy? A question which by the way no one felt up to answering or even expressing their opinion.

The closest we came were AKC's guidelines for introducing a new breed into their club.

The only purpose of life is the very moment you currently occupy. Dogs get this....

Bluedixie. why cant you give it a rest. Why are you continually hounding Ruffian. It can not possibly be because she refered to your dogs as mutts. It is by far less offensive than you refering to mine as "rat dogs".

If you are a dog and your owner suggests that you wear a sweater, suggest that he wear a tail.