Friday, September 30, 2005

After the Dutch voted against the EU Constitution, Prime Minister Jan-Peter Balkenende declared that the issue was off the table. Well, predictably, that turns out not to be the case.

The new parliamentary agenda which was published last week, features two references to the EU Constitution and how the Dutch government might go about reviving it. The link is in Dutch and by subscription, but here it is.

Under the heading "Cabinet has not given up on EU Constitution", the article states that the government will take up the issue in time for the EU ministerial in June 2006. However, the instructive part, roughly translated, is this:

"The Foreign Ministry budget for 2006 includes a research study by the Social and Cultural Planning Office – that's a government agency which "conducts research into the social aspects of all areas of government policy". And that study seems to conclude that the 1 June referendum vote was actually not a vote against the EU or the Constitution but merely expressed dissatisfaction about European decision-making processes. The government thinks that the June 2006 discussion concerning Europe should include a remedy against this shortcoming."

So there you have it: The Dutch "Social and Cultural Planning Office" has concluded that voters who voted against the EU Constitution did not vote against the EU Constitution.----------------------

I swear the EU looks like it has something on every leader of the countries in the EU. When does no not mean no? Do the EU not understand the word no?

The Labour leader's eldest son has told friends that he would like to "carry on the family name".

Oh come on. Is this some kind of bad joke? haven't we suffered enough with Tony Blair? He wants to carry on the family name? HA! What does he want to carry on? The traitorous government? the islamic take over of britain? the immigrant invasion of Britain? the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs? the loss of our sovereignty? The things that he might want to carry on in his father's name are endless so does he want to carry on every single one of them? If so then we are in for worse things to come.

MULTICULTURALISM is a divisive political concept that has fomented racial hatred and may have helped to produce the July 7 suicide bombers, a report claims today.

The report, from the right-of-centre think-tank Civitas, criticises what it called “hard” multiculturalists, who insist that no culture is better than any other and that society should celebrate difference.

“They simultaneously assert that no culture is better than another, but they will happily elaborate that Western culture is actually inferior and shy away from celebrating it for fear of causing offence,” the report says. “We are witnessing the revolt of the civilised against civilisation.”

“The fruits of 30 years of state-endorsed multiculturalism have seen increased inter-racial tension and inter-racial sectarianism,” the report, titled The Poverty of Multiculturalism, says. “The fact that the London suicide bombers were born and bred in Britain, and encouraged by the state to be different, illustrates that hard multiculturalism has the capacity to be not only divisive but decidedly lethal.”

Patrick West, the report’s author, discusses how London’s emergency services recently decided to employ linguists to translate calls. “Three million of London’s eight million inhabitants do not speak English as a first language,” his report says. “If everyone did speak English, such money could be invested in the emergency services and save more lives.

“It is time that we respected our own culture, as Westerners and Britons.”

Finally. A newspaper has shown that multiculturalism is an utter failure. Its about time someone did. Those "hard multiculturalists" are idiots. Anyone who thinks that a culture worshipping a paedophile is equal to ours needs their heads examined. Anyone who thinks covering women up equal to our culture really needs their heads examined.

I am glad that they have admitted that multiculturalism causes racial hatred as the BNP have been saying that for years.

Why don't nearly 50% of the population of London speak english? Why are they allowed to stay? Every single one of them should be deported now. If they can't speak english they shouldn't be here. A couple of weaks back they said that there was about 570,000 illegal immigrants in Britain and now we find there are 3 million none english speakers here legally. What a joke this country has become. Its time we got rid of every single illegal immigrant and none english speaker. It is totally ridiculous that they are allowed to stay in this country.

A Labour woman MP who was a prominent "Blair Babe" has been dumped by the party amid feuding and charges of sexism.

Jane Griffiths was dropped as candidate after she fell out with other MPs and complained of bullying by male officials in her local party.

She will be replaced in Reading East by councillor Tony Page, who has two convictions relating to picking up men for gay sex in public places.

Looks like Labour favours perverts instead of people that might be doing a good job. This isn't the worst of it though. His two convictions, in 1989 and 1995, both resulted in conditional discharges. They involved " cottaging" and might no longer be against the law following changes introduced since Labour came to power.

On the first occasion he was arrested following an encounter with a man in a public car park. The second incident took place in a lavatory cubicle at Reading train station.A Labour spokesman said: "These particular offences may not even be offences any more under changes in law that have happened since. They are not major convictions."

Why exactly isn't buggery in public places a crime anymore? Why has Labour legalised this perverted way of life? Needless to say this is disgusting. Buggery in public places should be a crime but I bet that Labour is trying to lure the pervert vote. Is it only muslims and other misfits that vote for this disgusting party?

Gordon Brown has suffered a body blow to his political reputation - just days after his confident speech to Labour conference - with the release of official figures showing the economy at its weakest level for 12 years.

Economic output showed an annual growth rate of 1.5 per cent during the summer, the lowest since the first quarter of 1993 when Britain, under John Major's Tory government, was emerging from recession.

The news, a revision to the Government's own figures yesterday, follows the Chancellor's admission that he would miss his forecast of growth of between 3 and 3.5 per cent this year. He had hinted during a visit to Washington for last week's International Monetary Fund meetings, that growth this year would be above 2 per cent but below 2.5 per cent.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Before Labour came to power we were economically the fourth most competitive country in the world. We are now the 13th most competitive country in the world. Thanks Blair and co, you have done a wonderful job, only joking.

What the hell is going on in this country? Why are people continuing to vote for Labour when it is obvious that they are the most thing to happen to this country since Neville Chamberlain?

Are people seriously this bline and if so, why are they this blind?

What has Blair succeeded in while he has been prime minister? I haven't seen one success from him and its about time he did something.

The growing oil prices are only going to make things worse and I am seriously starting to think that within the next 10 years the world will be plunged into another 1929 type depression and we could be one of those worst hit. Is Blair doing this on purpose? If we are in a 1929 like depression then he may say that europe will be better off united which will allow him to give complete sovereignty to the EU. It's unlikely but I can see it happening which is why we should get this disastrous government out now.

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Muslim paedophiles get away as government won't investigate

Last year you may remember (if you are British) a channel four documentary called Edge of the City. This documentary exposed that muslims in Keighley were molesting girls as young as 11. This documentary made the police act and get an investigation started on it. It may be surprising then that the investigation has been called off by Labour MP Anne cryer after the publicity of the documentary went away. This news was broken by bbc radio and you can listen to the broadcast here.

Thankfully the people aren't sitting back and taking it anymore. The British National Party are organising a protest a protest for November 4th to get them to restart the investigation. If you would like to go and you don't live anywhere near Keighley you should try and get in touch with your nearest BNP representative who will most likely be organising transport.

I hope you all will be there. I will be going as we can no longer allow the government and the islamic community to get away with it anymore. It is blatently obvious that the police will no longer protect us and we must do something about it before one more girl is molested.

If you are coming though be careful. I have heard that where we are protesting is right in the heart of "Muslimville" so there is most likely going to be a bit of rioting if it is infact near them.

I still hope to see you there. Someone must take a stand before it is too late. Who will protect us if we don't get them to? Labour won't. They are too busy appeasing the muslim paedophiles.

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Police surrender to muslims

Well you learn something new everyday. The have a messageboard BBC. I didn't think they would have anything like that. I went there and found that even the police are now pandering to muslims. The man in the messageboard said the following:

"I have recently arrived home, in Leeds, from work to be confronted by two Police Officers, who according to neighbours have been calling back and forth most of the day and at one point sat outside my door for over an hour during which time a number of neighbours were quizzed as to my whereabouts and "what sort of person I am".Many of whom thought that perhaps I had commited some heinous crime.

Had I killed a child, robbed the local bank at gun point or held Membership to an International Drug Cartel? The answer to that question is a resounding NO. My "crime"? I have flown the National flag of England on my property for the past two years since we bought this house, and Ihave been told, in no uncertain terms, that I risk arrest if I continue to do so.

It appears that someone who walked past my house over the weekend has reported that she finds seing the National Flag of this Country "uncomfortable" and has surmised that I am clearly a Racist and should be stopped from doing so.

The Police were quite candid in explaining that the complainant is Asian, probably Islamic, and lives in the area but not in my Street,(A cul-de-sac), but can see my Flag when he walks through the Park that is situated in close proximity to me. This person's discomfort was not reported to the local Police Station but to a "Community Constable" of whom there are many since the London Bombings.

I told the Police that the Pakistani Flag is often seen flying in this area of Beeston on both Cars and Buildings and that I sometimes found that uncomfortable but was warned that "those sort of comments were racist"."

Well wow. We can't even fly our own flag in our own country anymore? Is this country now New Pakistan? I wouldn't be surprised as Labour is in charge.

Why is it a criminal offence to fly the flag of your country? It is utterly ridiculous that you can't be proud of your own country and fly the flag of your own country.

Why exactly is the flag of pakistan flying? If they love their country so much why aren't they there?

A couple of days ago I talked about BK surrendering to a single muslim and now The Tate Britain art gallery has surrendered to muslims after it removed a sculpture from an exhibition for fear of offending Muslims, citing the "sensitive climate" following suicide bombings in London in July.

The museum decided not to include "God is Great" in a display of works by British-based John Latham, infuriating the artist and renewing debate over where to draw the line when censoring the arts.

"God is Great" features copies of the Bible, Koran and Talmud -- sacred texts of Christians, Muslims, and Jews respectively -- embedded in thick glass.

"Having sought wide-ranging advice, Tate feels that to exhibit the work in London in the current sensitive climate, post-July 7, would not be appropriate," a museum spokesman said.

This is worse than what BK did as art is an expression and they are denying everyone freedom of expression so they don't offend a few crazed muslims. Everyone should boycott The Tate Britain art gallery because anyone that surrenders to political correctness doesn't deserve our support. Anyone who tries to deny freedom of expression doesn't deserve our support.

I hope when the gallery is losing money he will look back on this and wish he hadn't done it.

Are you also sick of people pandering to muslims or political correctness? If you are you can tell Tate how you feel here.

Monday, September 26, 2005

An identity card could become a prerequisite to being hired by many of Britain's biggest employers, in a move that would undermine the supposedly voluntary nature of the controversial scheme.

Thirty of Britain's largest companies are in talks with the government about making the possession of ID cards - likely to cost at least £100 each - a central part of their employment practices.

The vast government-run database supporting the ID card system could also be tied into companies' payroll and benefits networks. Serving employees could also face identity checks against the information stored on the register.

The outcome of the discussions between the Home Office and companies including the Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and Tesco, could severely curtail the options for people who choose not to have a card when they are introduced on a voluntary basis in 2008.

I thought that ID cards were supposed to be voluntary? This just shows you the deceitful nature of the Blair government. Blair says one thing while secretly plotting to betray the british people. Its disgusting.

How long will it be before you can't even have a bank account without having an ID card? How long will it be before you can't even get a job without having an ID card?

This is yet more evidence that Labour is constantly plotting to betray us. Why do we allow this man in government?

Sunday, September 25, 2005

The fast-food chain, Burger King, is withdrawing its ice-cream cones after the lid of the dessert offended a Muslim.

The man claimed the design resembled the Arabic inscription for Allah, and branded it sacrilegious, threatening a "jihad".

The chain is being forced to spend thousands of pounds redesigning the lid with backing from The Muslim Council of Britain. It apologised and said: "The design simply represents a spinning ice-cream cone."

The offending lid was spotted in a branch in Park Royal last week by business development manager Rashad Akhtar, 27, of High Wycombe.

Personally I don't see how it looks like the inscription of allah but I am not mentally ill so I wouldn't see it. Why would BK stop selling their product just because of a single muslim complaining? Would they do the same if a single christian was complaining? I doubt it.

The question is why was the muslim in BK in the first place? They don't serve halal meet do they? if not his religion would have forbidden him to be there. If they do serve halal meet I won't ever be eating at BK. Infact I think I will boycott them for the fact that they gave in to a single muslim.

Saturday, September 24, 2005

PLUMMETING membership membership numbers will wipe out the Labour Party by 2010, a shock report warns today.

Only 24 hours before the start of the Labour Conference in Brighton, a left-wing think tank said 200,000 people had left the party in the last five years.

With just over 200,000 members left, the Fabian Society fears the end is in sight for the 100-year-old political party which once boasted more than a million members.

A spokesman said: "If that decline were to continue unabated, the last party member would be turning out the lights by around 2010."

That is fantastic to hear however I think 2010 is a bit too early but we can always hope that it happens.

In other great news the Liberal Democrat Party is being investigated by the elections watchdog over a £2.4 million donation from a company owned by a Swiss-based financier who is not even registered to vote in Britiain.

The Electoral Commission last night confirmed it was conducting an inquiry into whether donations from 5th Avenue Partners had complied with laws banning political parties from taking foreign money.

If they find against the Lib Dems the party will be forced to return the money, triggering a financial crisis.

So the Lib dems could be in a financial crisis and the Labour party could be extinct soon. Could the news get any better? If the Lib dems go into debt then they might not be able to finance anymore elections which would mean both the libdems and labour no longer existing which would allow other parties like the BNP to have a chance. The future is looking bright. Even if the BNP don't win the second best choice will and that is the Conservatives who will do very little but they will stop the EU from taking advantage of us (well not really but they will do more than Labour) and stop the breakup of the United kingdom and England.

I can also see a more likely scenario happening. Labour have the money and the power. The libdems have the membership. I can see them merging in the near future as they are both on the left political spectrum. What will they call themselves? New democrats? Labour Democrats? Only time will tell what will happen but I see it happening and if it does happen (god forbid) will Gordon Brown be the leader when Blair leaves or will Charles Kennedy? Scary thought whoever it is.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

BRITAIN is facing a housing crisis with a potential shortfall of 1.4 million homes, according to experts.

A comprehensive analysis projects an increase of 3.5 million households by 2021, or 175,000 extra households per year, The Times has learnt.

Housing experts claim that house-building needs to increase by 33 per cent from the current 154,000 a year to 220,000 a year to meet the rising demand, or the country faces spiralling homelessness and overcrowding. If building levels remain as they are there will be a shortfall of 1.4 million homes in 15 years. About 160,000 houses were built in 1950, rising to 291,000 in 1970. But this fell gradually to 135,000 in 2000, increasing only last year to more than 150,000.

The predicted explosion in households is due mainly to more people remaining single, rising divorce rates and older people living on their own rather than in nursing homes. However, nearly a quarter of the new households are due to increases in immigration.

Well that is a lie. Only 25% due to immigration? Don't make me laugh. Just a couple of months ago I taled about the 270,000 failed asylum seekers and 570,000 illegal immigrants (not counting dependants) still living in this country which amounts to 840,000. If we count the legal immigrants like they are doing here then immigration will account for 880,000 of the new homes. If we sent them back and stopped anymore from coming in we would only need an extra 520,000 homes which would save a lot of our countryside which is constantly being concreted over.

One in 10 Muslim students would not inform police if they learnt of a fellow Muslim planning a terrorist attack, a survey of young Muslims reveals.

The poll, by the Federation of Student Islamic Societies, found that although 72 per cent would inform police straight away, some said that they “would never grass on a Muslim”, while others cited mistrust of the police.

Muslim Student tend to be the least fundamentalist so 10% seems quite a lot. If this is indeed the truth (and there is no reason to think that it isn't) then it seems that we have traitors in our midst and we should do all we can to get them out of this country. Muslims (yes I am being discriminatory but it is needed) who want to go to university must sign a document saying that they put this country before islam and will inform on anyone planning violent attacks against this country. If they do not sign it they will lose their right to a university education in this country.This is needed. Its about time we started acting tough against muslims who hate our ways.

GORDON BROWN’S budget plans came in for criticism on two fronts yesterday as the IMF joined Brussels in giving warning that weakening growth will send Britain’s finances billions deeper into the red than he has forecast.

In a double blow to the credibility of the Chancellor’s tax and spending plans, the International Monetary Fund threw its weight behind warnings from the European Commission that government borrowing will remain above 3 per cent of national income up to 2006-07.

As the Commission left Mr Brown chastened with a formal rebuke for breaching the EU’s 3 per cent of GDP cap on state borrowing in the last two financial years, it joined the IMF in predicting that the Chancellor will have to borrow billions more than he has forecast into 2007.

In a further embarrassment for Mr Brown, who flies to Washington today for the IMF’s annual meetings, its latest projections also showed that he is on course to breach his self-imposed rule limiting Britain’s total national debt to 40 per cent of GDP. The IMF expects the national debt to hit 40.2 per cent next year, and 43.9 per cent in 2010.

George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said Mr Brown’s reputation had been further damaged.

“The IMF have lowered their growth forecast still further,” he said. “They have shown that Britain has a structural fiscal deficit that has grown faster than any other major economy since 2000. And they think the UK will have to tighten fiscal policy in the next year; the last thing we should be doing in a slowdown.”

So this country is going further and further into debt. How wonderful for us. This country just gets worse and worse.

Gordon Brown wants to be Prime minister after Blair but if he can't even keep Britain's finances in check how is he hoping to run the country which is far more responsibility than what we have now?

This government is just to incompetant. We need to get them out now and not later. Our fiscal deficit has grown faster than any other major economy.

Labour's election tune when they were elected was "Things can only get better". Better for whom? It should have been "Things can only get worse" as everything have only got worse since the Labour got into power.

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Three thousand junior doctors - trained at a cost of £250,000 each - are unemployed, it was claimed yesterday.

A third of them have given up trying to find work in the NHS and have decided to go private or move abroad, said the British Medical Association.

If this is indeed the truth and 3000 doctors are unable to find work what are we doing robbing the third world of doctors when we have our own? The third world needs doctors far more than we do. AIDs is ravaging those countries and if we continue to steal their professionals their countries will just get worse.

Monday, September 19, 2005

Is Blair a psychpath?

DOWNING Street was embarrassed last night after a frank account of the tantrums and cynicism of Tony Blair’s inner circle were published in the diaries of a former No 10 aide. The prime minister’s office censored parts of the diaries, the first memoirs from a No 10 spin doctor.

Lance Price, a former deputy to Alastair Campbell, reveals in his book, The Spin Doctor’s Diary, that:

Blair privately seemed to “relish” sending British forces to Iraq as his “first blooding”, while publicly claiming he did it “with a heavy heart”.

The prime minister angrily referred to the “f****** Welsh” when an election in the principality was going against Labour.

Blair made up policies on the hoof with his spin doctors, sometimes minutes before appearing on television.

Price, a former BBC reporter who is a close friend of Peter Mandelson, worked in No 10 from 1998 to 2001. He claims that the media was bullied, browbeaten and bribed with favours to report Labour favourably and that the BBC reveals its questions in advance to Blair at press conferences in return for their reporters being chosen to ask their questions first.

My god. I am not expert on mental health but if someone relishes declaring war I am pretty sure they need to be put in an insane asylum.

Do we really want this man governing us?

Also the fact that the media was bullied, browbeaten and bribed with favours to report Labour favourably shows what I have been saying for many months on this blog about the media. The media are infact in the pocket of Labour. How can we get our media back?

I am sure that we are going to be hearing more about Blair's corruption and no doubt it will be in the Sunday papers most of the time as Blair controls the press. So much for a free press.

Sunday, September 18, 2005

Asylum officers stuck at desks

IMMIGRATION officers have been criticised for wasting public money claiming overtime while spending excessive hours at their desks, when they should be catching illegal entrants. A report by Home Office officials and consultants has shown that less than half an officer’s time is spent on tracking down the estimated 300,000 failed asylum seekers. The rest is spent on paperwork or training.

The inquiry also found that £1.8m was spent teaching staff to conduct arrests, only for them to be removed from frontline operational duties. It said some officers were rostering themselves to work weekends when they can claim overtime, instead of during the week when they were more likely to detect bogus refugees.

Government figures this month showed the number of failed refugees being removed from Britain was falling despite the huge backlog of cases.

Shouldn't our immigration officials be spending more time doing the job that they are supposed to do instead of wasting their time and our money? They should be spending atleast 90% of their time tracking down criminals and not doing nothing. Immigration officials should be stopped from receiving overtime if they haven't filled their quota of immigrants. Its time that those that wasted tax payers money were sacked and replaced with competant officials who would do some good.

If they register for overtime at the weekends why aren't they capturing illegals then? Illegals aren't just here during the week and neither should immigration officials.

This is scandalous. When is Blair going to actually do something about it instead of letting the hoardes in?

GOVERNMENT policies failed to tackle Muslim extremism despite internal warnings that a “tougher political response” was required after the September 11 attacks, according to a former Foreign Office minister.

Denis MacShane, who was in the post until May, has described how his attempts to push for a more hardline approach were rebuffed because of concerns that Muslims would be offended. Only after the recent London attacks have ministers, Muslim groups and officials “engaged in a higher gear”.

“There wasn’t that sense of grip, of pulling together of departments,” said MacShane, who was directly involved in Britain’s policy response to the September 11 attacks. “Whitehall only moves if it is told in no uncertain terms, principally by the PM, ‘This is my priority, it is your priority’. You need very strong engagement by Downing Street.”

My god! can this government get any worse than it is? They didn't want to tackle islamic extremism before the london bombing because it may have offended muslims. If this government did their job and tried to protect us instead of giving in to muslims the people who died in the london bombing would be alive today.

Isn't it time we got a competant government that isn't scared to tackle the issue of islamic fundamentalism in this country before its too late? Blair has started doing something but it is far too late. He had to wait for british people to die before he even attempted to do anything.

Yet another damaging story hidden in the sunday papers. Why is it that the stories which are the most damaging to the Labour party are in the sunday papers when less people read the sunday papers?

Want to advertise your product on TV programmes? Well look no further than the BBC as companies are paying fees of up to £40,000 to advertise their products covertly on BBC programmes, often in breach of the corporation’s rules.

At least 50 cases have been identified where top brands have bought favourable exposure on BBC television by paying specialist agents.

The practice, known as product placement, is so widespread that some leading BBC dramas and lifestyle programmes depend on free gifts.

Examples range from eight different brands on the current series of Spooks, the hit BBC1 drama, to a Volkswagen Sharan driven by James Nesbitt in Murphy’s Law. An agent boasted that the value of the car’s appearance was equal to a £30,800 commercial break.

I thought that this was a channel with no advertisements? Well I guess I was wrong. It doesn't surprise me that we have corruption in the BBC afterall it is run by a corrupt government.

Yet another damaging story put in the sunday papers. Do they ever stop?

David Blunkett faces demands for an official inquiry into suggestions he abused his position by intervening over his son’s exam results when he was education secretary.

The Tories stepped up the pressure on the minister yesterday by demanding an investigation after former government advisers disclosed there had been concerns over the plight of Blunkett’s son during the 1998 exam crisis. One claimed there was circumstantial evidence Blunkett had intervened.

It has been suggested that Blunkett, who was education secretary from 1997 to 2001, became “terrified” that one of his sons could have been affected when computer problems led to fears that one examination board had given students incorrect grades.

Just last year Blunkett was found to have intervened when he was home office minister. He intervened regarding his lover's nanny. Since Blunkett has been in government he has been nothing but corrupt so it's no surprise that he will be making a comeback to join the cabinet after all the Labour party are full of the corrupt.

Have you also noticed yet another piece of news critical of the government that is buried in the Sunday papers?

Imagine you are living in the 1920s outside of Germany. Hitler has just went into politics and has begun talking about jews, none whites and communists. What would you think of Hitler? For me I wouldn't care as that time he was just someone insignificant to the outside world.

I have been watching the world lately and I can see that history is almost repeating itself. In the 1920s the first world war had only recently ended with Germany losing. Germany 0-1 Allies. This time Russia has lost the Cold war and what happened in Germany in the 1920s is happening in Russia now.

Russia now has 50,000 skinheads, higher than anywhere in the world and it gets even more freaky as 28 percent of adult Russians want to bring back special settlements for Jews, and 48 percent are in favor of limiting the rights of national minorities. 60 percent of Russian adults share the ideology, "Russia is for Russians, and all misfortunes are from foreigners."

5000 Russian 'intellectuals' including elected officials, generals and the Russian chess champion have all called for the ban on all Jewish organisations.

As you can see Russia is becoming more and more like nazi Germany. Soon the right people will be elected for them to become nazi and then we are in trouble.

It gets worse. Some Russian politicians have been threatening Estonia because they have supposedly been discriminating against the 300,000 ethnic Russians in Estonia.

The rise of ChinaJust like in the 1920s a new dangerous Asian superpower is emerging. In the 1920s it was Japan. Now it is China. Both countries westernised and both countries have or had a booming economy.There is something else they all share too and that is military conquest. For Japan they wanted to become like Europe and have colonies so they invaded their neighbours.

China not only wants to invade their neighbours but they also want to invade the americas and other parts of the world. China wants to take Taiwan back and also wants to invade Japan. You might have noticed the argument about the second world war massacres flaring up with Japan and China.

Third world warChi Haotian, China's Minister of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission has already stated that they need more living space and that The United States, Canada and Australia are the only places large enough to accommodate future Chinese needs. He notes the need for a quick, effective biological attack upon the U.S. to depopulate it as a prelude to conquest, and plainly states that China is working on genetic bio-weapons to kill everyone except "yellow people."

More frightening was his admission of an ongoing deliberate deception of the U.S., with China portraying itself as a peaceful business partner, while actually planning to kill "one or two hundred million Americans."

He also notes that thanks to trade, income from Chinese exports is providing the financing needed to vastly expand Chinese military might in preparation for an attack upon the U.S. which he seems to indicate will occur within "five to ten years."

If you don't believe what is happening why does China now run 2 bases on the Panama canal? It could only be for a base close to the USA to fire missiles.

United kingdom and European unionThe weird thing is not one country is doing anything about it. The European union and America are still trading with them and the United Kingdom's government are trying to make them weaker which would allow the Chinese to invade at will.

Blair and his cronies have already been reducing the size of our navy and trying to break up the United Kingdom through the plan that they have called Regionalisation by giving each region their own assembly and their own flag. If that is not an attempt to break up the UK into different countries I don't know what it. If they weren't going to be different countries why would they need their own flag?Anyway incase anyone didn't know regionalisation is an EU idea. John prescott tried to pass it off as his own but it was the idea of the EU.Regional assemblies would weaken Britain, infact it would destroy Britain. In these times Britain has to be united. If we are not united China and Russia will be able to walk all over us.

ConspiracyThe only reason I can think of why they aren't doing anything about China involves a conspiracy going around the world which involves China as the culprit.

Britain has not been invaded in over 900 years. A long time. I don't think any other country can say the same. The world knows that the United Kingdom will fight to the death to stop Britain from being invaded because of our wonderful patriotism. Regionalisation would crush that patriotism and let China take over us.

Many jobs in Britain and America are being outsourced to China. Does China control us? Is China the real boss of the EU? When regionalisation has sapped our patriotism will they invade then? The world hates wars and it is very unlikely that one region will stand up and fight for the other region if they knew many of their people would die. However if Britain remains united we will be willing to defend our island.

President Bush has repeatedly shown that he doesn't care for his country. He has left hs boarders open, refusing to defend them. Could he take it a step further? Could he be allowing the destruction of the United States. Many people already know he is in the pocket of the House of Saud. Could he be betraying his country and allowing China to build an army?

We have already seen that Tony Blair sells out to anyone. Could it be possible he is in the pockets of the EU? Could it be possible that that the EU is in the pocket of China? I don't think Tony Blair would sell out to China but I believe he would sell out to the EU and I believe the EU would sell out to China without the Knowledge of Blair.

If this is the case why hasn't MI5 and the security services told him? The answer is they are far more corrupt than Blair, Well the leadership are anyway. Dame Eliza, the head of MI5 has already said that civil liberties may have to be eroded which is roof that she is in the pocket of someone.

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Where has our sovereignty gone?

Brussels has been given the power to compel British courts to fine or imprison people for breaking EU laws, even if the Government and Parliament are opposed. An unprecedented ruling yesterday by the supreme court in Europe gives Brussels the power to introduce harmonised criminal law across the EU, creating for the first time a body of European criminal law that all member states must adopt. The judgment by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg was bitterly fought by 11 EU governments, including Britain, and marks a dramatic transfer of power from national capitals to Brussels.

Ladies and gentleman who are reading this you have just seen the last bit of sovereignty go which is the right to make and enforce our own laws. We now have to do what the EU wants even if parliament doesn't want to which shows parliament no longer governs us.

There has been no threat from the big three to remove Britain from the EU. Infact they have all been silent except for the Liberal democrats. Chris Davies, the leader of the Liberal Democrats in Europe, said: “Europe needs an umpire to ensure fair play between member states and to dismiss the cheats. The European Commission is the only body that comes close to fitting that role.”

This silence can hardly be surprising. All the big three are traitors to this country. They do not care for us. They only care that we are dominated more and more by the european union.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

BNP papers now safe

At about 1800hrs today (12th) two BNP officials received telephone calls from Kent Police who admitted they made a mistake and that the print run of 60,000 copies the BNP's monthly newspaper can be uplifted at the earliest opportunity from the HM Customs compound at Dover docks.

This is a wonderful victory for freedom, not just for the BNP but for everyone. It shows that the BNP cannot be intimidated and they will continue to fight for the British way of life.

This is a blow to the fascists of the Labour party who want to take away our basic freedoms of speech. The BNP may have won this one but we all have lost when Labour introduced the religious hate law just a few months ago.

Monday, September 12, 2005

Blair's gestapo seize BNP papers

The entire consignment of the September issue of the British National party's newspaper "Voice of Freedom" has been seized by Special Branch at Dover docks.

In the early hours of Sunday (11th) morning the lorry driven from the Slovak Republic where the papers are printed was stopped by HM Customs accompanied by officers from Special Branch, the political police force. Although the two Slovak drivers have been released after interview, the entire print run of 60,000 copies remains impounded.

So far no reason has been given for the seizure but it is a blatant attempt by the New Labour regime to silence the only genuine opposition to its creeping totalitarianism.

Why has Labour done this? Just a couple of months ago Labour did say they would try and stop the BNP but even I didn't think they would halt even more rights.

This country is becoming more and more totalitarian under Labour. We can no longer say anything insulting about religions and if a party like the BNP try and stand up for our rights the Labour regime do everything possible to stop them even taking away the freedom of the press and other basic human rights and they have the nerve to criticise zimbabwe. We are heading the way of zimbabwe. For more proof of that we are living in a repressive and totalitarian state all you need to do is look at last week because last week BNP councillor Angela Clarke was violently arrested and allegedly assaulted by police officers in Keighley Keighley. The police attended following a complaint made by a political rival activist who spotted the BNP councillor on a quiet night out in the town, Mrs. Clarke attempted to remonstrate with police about the political nature of the allegation, however police are alleging that the councillor was aggressive and resisted arrest. Over 20 witnesses have come forward to state that the police acted heavy handed, without justification and refused to investigate the validity of the accusations made against the Keighley Councillor.

To everyone reading this. If you care about the freedom for everyone spread this around. Put it on your own blog. Tell your mothers, fathers, sisters, aunties, uncles and many other people. Even the bloke down the pub will do. Spread the word. Let everyone know what is going on in our country. Don't let them get away with it.

Sunday, September 11, 2005

Blair changing law to get more money

Labour has been accused of altering by stealth the rules over political donations, which would let it solicit gifts behind closed doors.

Under proposals in the Company Law Reform Bill, a copy of which has been seen by The Sunday Telegraph, trade unions would no longer be regarded as "political" organisations. This would enable companies to donate more freely to unions, which supply much of the money that finances the Labour Party.

The legislation would create a loophole in the tight regime effected by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act of 2000. It would let companies fund unions without shareholder approval.

David Willetts, the shadow trade and industry secretary, said: "This looks like a cosy deal that Labour are trying to smuggle through to help them raise money without the normal controls.

Tory MPs said that the new law could be used to funnel money into the Labour Party via the unions, which donated £42 million out of a total £66 million given to the party in the last Parliament.

As you can see Blair is changing the law to benefit him. How can people still not think this guy is corrupt?

Blair is the most corrupt leader we have ever had and if we continue to have the Labour party in government things are just going to get worse especially with Blair as their leader.

If I was prime minister I would ban all unions from donating any amount of money to any political party. That would probably ruin Labour as they get more than half of their funding from unions which means that at the moment they are in the pocket of unions. To stop political parties being corrupt the public should finance them through taxes like they do in Germany and other countries. Over there they seem to have very little corruption. So maybe for every politician they have in parliament the party receives £10,000. This would make them do what is best for the country and not special interest groups.

The corruption doesn't end there with Blair though because Tony Blair is under intense pressure to explain his links with a City financier whose company has earned millions of pounds from government contracts.

The Prime Minister spent part of his recent Caribbean holiday on Sea Dog, the 20ft speedboat owned by Russell Chambers, and now senior political figures are accusing Mr Blair of failing to address "conflict of interest" issues concerning the businessman.

So Blair gives millions of pounds of government contracts to a businessman who is a friend of his and Blair gets to spend part of his holiday on his speedboat. Do people seriously not see that Blair is corrupt?

Also has anyone noticed that these stories were tucked away in Sunday papers? This normally happens when stories that show Blair as a bad man turn up as the media are in league with him and hardly anyone reads sunday papers.

Advisers appointed by Tony Blair after the London bombings are proposing to scrap the Jewish Holocaust Memorial Day because it is regarded as offensive to Muslims. They want to replace it with a Genocide Day that would recognise the mass murder of Muslims in Palestine, Chechnya and Bosnia as well as people of other faiths.

At last the government has found some common sense. It is about time we had a genocide memorial day. I have been wanting this for more than 2 years and in my blog posts I have been calling for one. Do the government advisers read my blog?

I am glad that we will be remembering all the genocides and not just the holocaust as the jews should never have a monopoly on genocide rememberance.

However the government is taking it a bit too far. They are going to have multiple genocide memorial days. One for each faith. That is not needed one bit. It will reduce the significance of the genocide memorial days. To have one is better as it is remembering the hundreds of millions that have been massacred through the years.

Friday, September 09, 2005

In Thirty years the landscape will be blotched with housing, while that which remains of open land will be riddled with fairways, paddocks and shimmering polythene.

The report by the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England is based on a series of damaging trends.

Among them are a greatly expanded house-building programme, a huge growth of freight distribution, major expansion of airports and a decline in farming.

It says that traffic is growing faster on rural roads than in urban areas and that about 21 square miles of countryside, an area the size of Southampton, is lost to development every year.

Why is Labour making this worse? Anyone with even half a brain knows that more immigration=more housing=more of our countrside lost. Why is Labour doing nothing about the issue and just making things worse? Shouldn't we be stopping immigration so we can save what we have left of our countryside?

Why would we need to expand airports? Why can't the Labour government find ways to reduce air travel such as taxing aviation fuel like they tax other fuel? This would increase the cost of flying thus reducing demand thus reducing the need for bigger airports. This would then stop the countryside from being concreted over. Why hasn't Blair thought of this? If he actually cared for the environment he would do this but as we can see Blair just doesn't give a crap. In about two more years he can quit as prime minister and retire in a foreign country.

We can't wait much longer. Thirty years isn't that long of a time. We need to start doing things about it now. It is obvious that Labour doesn't care enough to do it.

Another problem that taxing aviation fuel would solve is fuel protests that are due to happen tomorrow. Campaigning group Fuel Lobby has already vowed to blockade every refinery in the country if the Government fails to cut petrol tax.

Why not cut petrol tax and make up the financial shortfall by taxing aviation fuel? This would solve both problems without losing the tax money which the country needs.

Thursday, September 08, 2005

The political revolution has finally started. The Labour party have lost over 200,000 of their members and is reportedly near disintegration in some parts of the UK.

At last even their membership are seeing Tony the traitor for what he is. It's now only a matter of time before we get this traitor out of government.

The Labour party are so panicked by this issue that they have set up a commission paid for by trade union donations. I bet Blair will reward them soon with whast they want as we all know that Blair is a corrupt traitor.

I just hope the disintergration of the Labour party happens before the european elections. I hope that this country tells labour were to stick it then and vote for euro realist parties like the BNP.

I am beginning to feel sad that Blair is leaving politics as in the next general election I would love to see his face when he loses. He would look devastated and I would be the happest person on earth but we will have even more incompetant people leading the Labour party.

Wednesday, September 07, 2005

EU idiots try to make more laws

A proposal being debated in the European parliament could force construction workers to cover up on sunny days incase they get skin cancer.

Can anyone see the logic in this? On a hot day construction workers take their tops off because they are hot. Forcing them to keep their tops on will most likely kill them from heat exhaustion so the EU is probably going to kill more people than they save.

It is bad enough the British construction workers have to fight off competition from cheap migrant labour without daft legislation coming from Europe making life more uncomfortable.

This proposal is yet more evidence (as if anymore was needed) that the EU is a waste of taxpayers money.

Tuesday, September 06, 2005

Holocaust pops up again

Once again the holocaust is part of politics again as the Queen has agreed to become patron of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust Holocaust Memorial day trust, the charity which has taken over responsibility from the Home Office for the annual remembrance of the Jewish victims of Nazi persecution.

I can't believe people are still going on about a minor detail of the second world war. Sure it was tragic but 56 million people died altogether in the war and a minority-6 million were jews. Why should we have a special day for a minority of people?

Where is the remembrance day for 96 million people that died because of communism? I don't see one but that genocide was far more terrible.

Instead of Holocaust memorial day why can't we have a Genocide memorial day for the victims of all genocides including the holocaust and the communist genocide?

Its time we stop going on about the holocaust as much more worse genocides have happened since then and they are more worthy to remember than the holocaust.

Sunday, September 04, 2005

Blair has done it again. If you don't yet know about avian flu where have you been?

Well this is the issue. Avian flu has started in poultry in China and has begun spreading to europe and the scary thing is it could mutate and infect humans.

At this moment in time our government only have enough vaccinations for 2% of the population for 1 week which is about 1.2 million people. Guess what Blair's solution is? You guessed it...

Members of Britain's elite have been selected as priority cases to receive scarce pills and vaccinations at the taxpayers' expense if the country is hit by a deadly bird flu outbreak. Workers at the BBC and prominent politicians - such as cabinet ministers - would be offered protection from the virus.

Why should prominent politicians get it? The only politicians that would need it are the Prime minister, Deputy prime minister, Home office minister and the health minister. I fail to see how the other minnisters would need it.

Why would the BBC need the jab? They aren't needed. We don't need to watch Eastenders in a bloody epidemic or hear the obvious on the news like "You are all going to die". I am sneezing like hell and now the BBC has just made me lose all hope. What use are the BBC? Why can't children, the elderly and the pregant be given the jab instead of the BBC?

Are the BBC being rewarded for all their hard work in helping the Labour government spread propoganda?

In utter contempt for democracy the members of the labour party will be getting jabs while the opposition won't be receiving them. Well it is good to know when the epidemic has finished Blair's party will be the only viable party to vote for seen as everyone else is dead. OH wait no it isn't.

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Aid must stop

We have again found that giving aid harms the countries that receive aid.The following that I am about to post is an interview with a kenyan economics expert that proves that giving aid is harmful. You can see the orriginal here:

The Kenyan economics expert James Shikwati, 35, says that aid to Africa does more harm than good. The avid proponent of globalization spoke with SPIEGEL about the disastrous effects of Western development policy in Africa, corrupt rulers, and the tendency to overstate the AIDS problem.SPIEGEL: Mr. Shikwati, the G8 summit at Gleneagles is about to beef up the development aid for Africa...Shikwati: ... for God's sake, please just stop.SPIEGEL: Stop? The industrialized nations of the West want to eliminate hunger and poverty.Shikwati: Such intentions have been damaging our continent for the past 40 years. If the industrial nations really want to help the Africans, they should finally terminate this awful aid. The countries that have collected the most development aid are also the ones that are in the worst shape. Despite the billions that have poured in to Africa, the continent remains poor.SPIEGEL: Do you have an explanation for this paradox?Shikwati: Huge bureaucracies are financed (with the aid money), corruption and complacency are promoted, Africans are taught to be beggars and not to be independent. In addition, development aid weakens the local markets everywhere and dampens the spirit of entrepreneurship that we so desperately need. As absurd as it may sound: Development aid is one of the reasons for Africa's problems. If the West were to cancel these payments, normal Africans wouldn't even notice. Only the functionaries would be hard hit. Which is why they maintain that the world would stop turning without this development aid.SPIEGEL: Even in a country like Kenya, people are starving to death each year. Someone has got to help them.Shikwati: But it has to be the Kenyans themselves who help these people. When there's a drought in a region of Kenya, our corrupt politicians reflexively cry out for more help. This call then reaches the United Nations World Food Program -- which is a massive agency of apparatchiks who are in the absurd situation of, on the one hand, being dedicated to the fight against hunger while, on the other hand, being faced with unemployment were hunger actually eliminated. It's only natural that they willingly accept the plea for more help. And it's not uncommon that they demand a little more money than the respective African government originally requested. They then forward that request to their headquarters, and before long, several thousands tons of corn are shipped to Africa ...SPIEGEL: ... corn that predominantly comes from highly-subsidized European and American farmers ...Shikwati: ... and at some point, this corn ends up in the harbor of Mombasa. A portion of the corn often goes directly into the hands of unsrupulous politicians who then pass it on to their own tribe to boost their next election campaign. Another portion of the shipment ends up on the black market where the corn is dumped at extremely low prices. Local farmers may as well put down their hoes right away; no one can compete with the UN's World Food Program. And because the farmers go under in the face of this pressure, Kenya would have no reserves to draw on if there actually were a famine next year. It's a simple but fatal cycle.SPIEGEL: If the World Food Program didn't do anything, the people would starve.Shikwati: I don't think so. In such a case, the Kenyans, for a change, would be forced to initiate trade relations with Uganda or Tanzania, and buy their food there. This type of trade is vital for Africa. It would force us to improve our own infrastructure, while making national borders -- drawn by the Europeans by the way -- more permeable. It would also force us to establish laws favoring market economy.SPIEGEL: Would Africa actually be able to solve these problems on its own?Shikwati: Of course. Hunger should not be a problem in most of the countries south of the Sahara. In addition, there are vast natural resources: oil, gold, diamonds. Africa is always only portrayed as a continent of suffering, but most figures are vastly exaggerated. In the industrial nations, there's a sense that Africa would go under without development aid. But believe me, Africa existed before you Europeans came along. And we didn't do all that poorly either.SPIEGEL: But AIDS didn't exist at that time.Shikwati: If one were to believe all the horrorifying reports, then all Kenyans should actually be dead by now. But now, tests are being carried out everywhere, and it turns out that the figures were vastly exaggerated. It's not three million Kenyans that are infected. All of the sudden, it's only about one million. Malaria is just as much of a problem, but people rarely talk about that.SPIEGEL: And why's that?Shikwati: AIDS is big business, maybe Africa's biggest business. There's nothing else that can generate as much aid money as shocking figures on AIDS. AIDS is a political disease here, and we should be very skeptical.SPIEGEL: The Americans and Europeans have frozen funds previously pledged to Kenya. The country is too corrupt, they say.Shikwati: I am afraid, though, that the money will still be transfered before long. After all, it has to go somewhere. Unfortunately, the Europeans' devastating urge to do good can no longer be countered with reason. It makes no sense whatsoever that directly after the new Kenyan government was elected -- a leadership change that ended the dictatorship of Daniel arap Mois -- the faucets were suddenly opened and streams of money poured into the country.SPIEGEL: Such aid is usually earmarked for a specific objective, though.Shikwati: That doesn't change anything. Millions of dollars earmarked for the fight against AIDS are still stashed away in Kenyan bank accounts and have not been spent. Our politicians were overwhelmed with money, and they try to siphon off as much as possible. The late tyrant of the Central African Republic, Jean Bedel Bokassa, cynically summed it up by saying: "The French government pays for everything in our country. We ask the French for money. We get it, and then we waste it."SPIEGEL: In the West, there are many compassionate citizens wanting to help Africa. Each year, they donate money and pack their old clothes into collection bags ...Shikwati: ... and they flood our markets with that stuff. We can buy these donated clothes cheaply at our so-called Mitumba markets. There are Germans who spend a few dollars to get used Bayern Munich or Werder Bremen jerseys, in other words, clothes that that some German kids sent to Africa for a good cause. After buying these jerseys, they auction them off at Ebay and send them back to Germany -- for three times the price. That's insanity ...SPIEGEL: ... and hopefully an exception.Shikwati: Why do we get these mountains of clothes? No one is freezing here. Instead, our tailors lose their livlihoods. They're in the same position as our farmers. No one in the low-wage world of Africa can be cost-efficient enough to keep pace with donated products. In 1997, 137,000 workers were employed in Nigeria's textile industry. By 2003, the figure had dropped to 57,000. The results are the same in all other areas where overwhelming helpfulness and fragile African markets collide.SPIEGEL: Following World War II, Germany only managed to get back on its feet because the Americans poured money into the country through the Marshall Plan. Wouldn't that qualify as successful development aid?Shikwati: In Germany's case, only the destroyed infrastructure had to be repaired. Despite the economic crisis of the Weimar Republic, Germany was a highly- industrialized country before the war. The damages created by the tsunami in Thailand can also be fixed with a little money and some reconstruction aid. Africa, however, must take the first steps into modernity on its own. There must be a change in mentality. We have to stop perceiving ourselves as beggars. These days, Africans only perceive themselves as victims. On the other hand, no one can really picture an African as a businessman. In order to change the current situation, it would be helpful if the aid organizations were to pull out.SPIEGEL: If they did that, many jobs would be immediately lost ...Shikwati: ... jobs that were created artificially in the first place and that distort reality. Jobs with foreign aid organizations are, of course, quite popular, and they can be very selective in choosing the best people. When an aid organization needs a driver, dozens apply for the job. And because it's unacceptable that the aid worker's chauffeur only speaks his own tribal language, an applicant is needed who also speaks English fluently -- and, ideally, one who is also well mannered. So you end up with some African biochemist driving an aid worker around, distributing European food, and forcing local farmers out of their jobs. That's just crazy!SPIEGEL: The German government takes pride in precisely monitoring the recipients of its funds.Shikwati: And what's the result? A disaster. The German government threw money right at Rwanda's president Paul Kagame. This is a man who has the deaths of a million people on his conscience -- people that his army killed in the neighboring country of Congo.SPIEGEL: What are the Germans supposed to do?Shikwati: If they really want to fight poverty, they should completely halt development aid and give Africa the opportunity to ensure its own survival. Currently, Africa is like a child that immediately cries for its babysitter when something goes wrong. Africa should stand on its own two feet.

As you can see giving aid is disastrous to their economy. The third world cannot build itself up if do gooders continue to give aid that just hurts them more than it helps them.If you truly want to help them you should leave them alone as they must get themselves out of poverty. Sure many will die in the short term but many more will die in the long term if we don't leave them alone.

Another issue about aid is why should our government spend our money on foreign countries when some people in our own country live in poverty and up to 50,000 pensioners die each year. British money should be spent on British people and no one else.If this was stopped there would still be some do gooders who would complain so a solution would be to start an Emergency Disaster Relief Fund. Whoever wants to contribute can give 2% extra in taxes that will head to the fund and be spent on countries facing disasters like famine and severe flooding. Every country that is facing a disaster would receive money whether they are rich or poor, democratic or not democratic.

The time of giving aid must end and the sooner it ends the faster places like Africa can progress.

Friday, September 02, 2005

The coming world war

It is only a matter of time before earth is plunged into another world war.The prime suspects for the people who start the war are Russia, the Middle east or China.

You may think that we have no chance of going to war with Russia but there has been a rise of fascism in Russia and it is only a matter of time before fascists take over either through a coup or an election as Russia has the largest skinhead population in the world.Also many Russian politicians have been getting more and more antijewish and some have called for a ban on all jewish organisations.One politician has even threatened Estonia so once it begins Estonia will be one of the first to go. Either joining Russia peacefully or through force.

Within the next 30 years the war will start and we should start preparing for it starting with protecting our boarders, building up the military and changing the education system.

We must stop all immigrants from entering the country and make it so uncomfortable for muslims to be here that they will leave as the last thing we need is muslim infiltrators when we are at war.We should should get them out by doing the following:1. Ban all halal meat2. Ban any more mosques from being built3. Ban the burqua and hijab in all public places4. Ban anymore Qurans from being made or brought into the country5. Make a british version of the Quran with all violent passages removed and only allow that to be sold in this country.6. Only allow the british version in mosques7. Treat muslims how they would treat dhimmis.

The next thing we should do is start the draft again so people have to join the army. People will be able to opt out of it though as long as they revoke their citizenship and leave the country within 1 month never to return. If they don't leave within 1 month they will be deported to the first country that will take them.The next thing we need to do is change education and modern languages. In war we will need translators or spies so starting from primary school age they will be taught Russian, Chinese, Dutch or Arabic.They will not be taught French, Spanish or German as those are not important to national security.

Why Dutch you ask? Well within 25 years the Netherlands will become majority muslim however I think that within 10 years the muslims will have enough to take the Netherlands by force and sadly even if the Dutch act now I don't think they can be saved.

We must start planning for the war now and keep out of it as long as we can however this may mean leaving our allies to be slaughtered but that may be best for us because the war will probably become a war of attrition and if the enemy succeed in killing our allies we will easily be able to destroy them as they won't have enough men or resources left.

Hopefully it won't come to this but we should start planning nonetheless and if it does start we will be glad that we are ready and that our children have the knowledge to defeat them as they will know what is going on. If it doesn't happen there will be no harm done.