Comments on: Moto X Reviewhttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/
Feeding Your Gadget and Tech ObsessionsTue, 31 Mar 2015 21:57:00 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1By: Kirsten Dunsthttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-308706
Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:36:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-308706my boyfriends brother just got an awesome cream Saab 9-3 Convertible just by some parttime working online with a laptop. i loved this JOBS70.ℂOM
]]>By: n900mixalothttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-308487
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:44:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-308487Why thank you!
]]>By: Anonhttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-308486
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:39:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-30848626.33 gigs on the 32 gig model out of the box.
]]>By: TrentBradleyhttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-305809
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:36:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-305809Probably because he didn’t kill any open applications before going to bed.
]]>By: furfmonkeyhttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304839
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:41:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304839buy a phone to talk and a DSLR for pics problem solved.. if a Phone” is your primary camera that is your first problem
]]>By: A Driverhttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304783
Thu, 08 Aug 2013 03:34:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304783Just curious but how do you see phones changing in two year’s time? I’d argue from the benchmarks I’ve seen of the Moto X, it has a better GPU than most other flagship phones and as a result has plenty of life in it. Apart from games what other apps really tax a smartphone?

The market is also so fragmented in terms of specifications that the mid to lowest common denominator will still need to be factored into software design. I think it’s likely the next two years will see more rationlisation of the market place, hopefully, with more focus on optimization, until something like the Ubuntu Edge comes out and creates a new category of superphones.

]]>By: Tamadrummer94http://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304676
Wed, 07 Aug 2013 12:53:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304676Great! So why is the Moto X losing so much?
]]>By: Stocklonehttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304644
Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:01:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304644My Android phone loses 1-2% overnight. So what now?
]]>By: Good ol' JShttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304593
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:48:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304593Wait a few months.. That’s what I’m doing. I’ll pickup this phone when the price drops a bit and I can get it customized how I want. The only problem with that is that the wait will put it in direct competition with the Note 3 and Xperia Z Ultra…both of which I’m considering.
]]>By: MSmith79http://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304589
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:43:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304589Good review!

My problem with the dual core isn’t about whether or not it’s capable today. It’s about how it will perform in 2 years. There’s very little future-proof built in. Had it cost $350 off-contract, I would have been ok with it, with the knowledge I could easily get a new phone if I had to. But at $600 it’s risky.

]]>By: Fresh360http://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304581
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:07:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-30458121hrs of real world use is amazing to me considering the size of the phone and battery…
]]>By: Good ol' JShttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304571
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:43:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304571My S4 can last just about 48 hours with medium use and about 5-6 hours of screen on time. Android is doing just fine. Battery levels are always subjective anyway. You need to look at the apps running and background services as well as signal strength. Then you can compare battery life.
]]>By: Tamadrummer94http://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304570
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:21:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304570Um, 26% loss of charge on standby over 8 hours?! That’s terrible, my iPhone 5 loses 4-6% overnight. Maybe anandtech was right, Apple really does have iOS power management tightly tuned. I hope Google works hard at this in the future.
]]>By: Good ol' JShttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304561
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:17:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304561I thought the one of the “We’re the Miller’s” sign looked great. It’s a combination of low and high lighting and everything shows very well.
]]>By: Guesthttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304555
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 09:38:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304555How many hours screen time on a full charge cycle?
]]>By: SChttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304527
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 02:49:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304527Honestly I think the lower specs (relative of course) are a good thing. Hopefully it will put an end to the spec wars and instead force manufacturers to focus more on build quality and different enhancements to Android itself, instead of degrading into an inane pissing contest with worthless benchmark results.
]]>By: Kindroidhttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304513
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:48:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304513Educating buyers on the negligible differences between the Moto X and top spec phones, for a majority of users, will be what Google uses that $500 million dollar advertising fund. Early adopter pricing will be at the $199 level. But, discounting will probably kick in quickly. Look for $99 or less phones within 60 days of launch. As far as specs go. The Moto X is using Krait 300 processors, which will place it close to the top of the heap in raw specs. And with some savvy optimizing, could possibly compete with top spec phones in processing terms. The 720p screen is a little more problematic. But again, if the average user compares phones in the stores…..probably isn’t going to be able to see the difference. The quality of the image will be as important as resolution numbers. Going to be interesting.
]]>By: Chris Davieshttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304505
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:55:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304505http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/moto_x_live_sg_31.jpg – 11.88GB out of the box on the 16GB model.
]]>By: n900mixalothttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304504
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:53:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304504Only one question: how much free internal storage space is available?
]]>By: n900mixalothttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304503
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:52:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304503Not unless they’re blown up … but you have HTC to thank for that shift in thinking.
]]>By: kioshihttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304501
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:41:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304501Wow these camera pics look terrible.
]]>By: n900mixalothttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304500
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:40:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304500Fantastic review!
]]>By: Cristian Borsahttp://www.slashgear.com/moto-x-review-05292768/#comment-304497
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:32:00 +0000http://www.slashgear.com/?p=292768#comment-304497With 4.3 and some software tweaks, the battery life should be amazing.
]]>