<quoted text>No need to take courses: just go to church and visit with the priest or pastor, or join the Boy Scouts and visit the home of the Boy Scout leader on a weekend...Two institutions beloved by conservatives....

Cali.

I don't have any beef with Homosexuals, but when I was a Boy Scout, I never noticed any evidence of Homosexuality. In fact, "the subject" was never even brought up. Perhaps that was the reason that - if in fact Homosexuality existed in the Boy Scouts in those days - it was rare.

Also, although I am not Catholic, I recall news reports made during the heady days of the revolution that told of organized groups of priests - as well as groups of "interested others" - who demanded the Catholic church "become inclusive" by hiring priests regardless of their "sexual orientation". Could there possibly be any connection with the many $millions subsequently paid out to compensate victims practicing Homosexual priests?

<quoted text>Fa-Foxy.Well, for one thing, it's because our Homosexual friends and the lesbians have successfully lobbied their politician pals to use hard earned taxpayer money to teach Homosexuality to innocent little non-Homosexual children in expensive taxpayer funded Government schools. Until then, few non-Homosexual taxpayers cared one way or the other what their Homosexual friends and the lesbians did in the privacy of their own bedrooms. Now, Homosexuality is EVERYONE'S business.Ronald

Nope, that's called a "conspiracy theory," not to be confused with a scientific theory as those are based on reality.

<quoted text>Cali.I don't have any beef with Homosexuals, but when I was a Boy Scout, I never noticed any evidence of Homosexuality. In fact, "the subject" was never even brought up. Perhaps that was the reason that - if in fact Homosexuality existed in the Boy Scouts in those days - it was rare.Also, although I am not Catholic, I recall news reports made during the heady days of the revolution that told of organized groups of priests - as well as groups of "interested others" - who demanded the Catholic church "become inclusive" by hiring priests regardless of their "sexual orientation". Could there possibly be any connection with the many $millions subsequently paid out to compensate victims practicing Homosexual priests?Ronald

More conspiracy theories, you'll buy into anything as long as there's no evidence.

<quoted text>Fa-Foxy.Well, for one thing, it's because our Homosexual friends and the lesbians have successfully lobbied their politician pals to use hard earned taxpayer money to teach Homosexuality to innocent little non-Homosexual children in expensive taxpayer funded Government schools. Until then, few non-Homosexual taxpayers cared one way or the other what their Homosexual friends and the lesbians did in the privacy of their own bedrooms. Now, Homosexuality is EVERYONE'S business.Ronald

And so you believe you can put an effective stop to that by hanging out all day on an LGBT forum, and demeaning people. Correct ?

<quoted text>And so you believe you can put an effective stop to that by hanging out all day on an LGBT forum, and demeaning people. Correct ?

Fa-Foxy

Well, I was not aware that expensive taxpayer funded courses being taught at expensive taxpayer funded Government controlled California universities by high paid ideologically driven "professors" were the exclusive domain of taxpayer subsidized "students.

Be that as it may, let me see if I gotten this all straight. Our Homosexual friends and the lesbians make claims of being just another oppressed minority. Once they get the attention of the hard working minority of Californians who pay taxes, their radical leaders demand "inclusiveness".

Once they are judged to be "just like anyone else", they then make claims to being a privileged class in order to be beneficiary to hard earned taxpayer money without oversight or questioning, thereby becoming "exclusive". Then decent taxpayers of good-will who question the wasting of hard earned taxpayer money on frivolous taxpayer funded "studies" are stigmatized as "demeaners".

I can understand that our radical Homosexual university friends and the lesbians might hate the taxpayers at whose teats they suckle. The only question I have is whether or not they hate the children too?

<quoted text>Fa-FoxyWell, I was not aware that expensive taxpayer funded courses being taught at expensive taxpayer funded Government controlled California universities by high paid ideologically driven "professors" were the exclusive domain of taxpayer subsidized "students.Be that as it may, let me see if I gotten this all straight. Our Homosexual friends and the lesbians make claims of being just another oppressed minority. Once they get the attention of the hard working minority of Californians who pay taxes, their radical leaders demand "inclusiveness".Once they are judged to be "just like anyone else", they then make claims to being a privileged class in order to be beneficiary to hard earned taxpayer money without oversight or questioning, thereby becoming "exclusive". Then decent taxpayers of good-will who question the wasting of hard earned taxpayer money on frivolous taxpayer funded "studies" are stigmatized as "demeaners".I can understand that our radical Homosexual university friends and the lesbians might hate the taxpayers at whose teats they suckle. The only question I have is whether or not they hate the children too?Ronald

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.