This blog contains comments by Dr. Lewis Pulsipher about games he is designing or has designed in the past, as well as comments on game design in general. Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/LewisPulsipher

Patreon

https://www.patreon.com/LewisPulsipher I have finally created a Patreon page to support my YouTube channel and blogging. For those who don't know, Patreon is much like Kickstarter insofar as it enables individuals to support worthwhile projects. But unlike Kickstarter, this is continuing, monthly, support (at a level as low as $1 a month).

Friday, May 30, 2014

Tension and Relaxation
If a level/adventure is very much “the same”, whether always tense or always relaxed, it’s missing something
Constant tension becomes tedious
Constant relaxation is only for those who play games purely to relax
So for most game levels/adventures, alternation of tension and relaxation is ideal

Writers of fiction of all kinds (including movies) recognize this
So
in movies, you have periods of tension followed by periods of
relaxation, though the trend overall is upward to the final climax
(This is also called “peaks and valleys”, from the look of it on the chart)
As illustrated on the next page, from Star Wars (original 1977 movie)

Each level has its own overall rising tension as it goes from peak to valley to peak
This is also true of the game (or campaign in RPGs) as a whole
Also watch Extra credits: Pacing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LScL4CWe5E
And I’d read the article the chart came from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4032/beyond_pacing_games_arent_.php

Wednesday, May 07, 2014

Big ("AAA" ) video games continue to become more expensive yet shorter,
because 3D/complex "content" costs so much. This is a video/screencast
discussion of existing, successful alternative ways to inexpensively
provide content.

Content = Expense in Video Games
In most video games, as in puzzles, the creator(s) of the game must provide all of the “content” – everything the player(s) can possibly do
When computers were very limited, this was not a problem
One person could provide all the content: programming, “graphics” such as they were, “sound” such as it was
But in the 3D computer age content is much more expensive
Typically more artists than non-artists work on a AAA game

This is why games are getting shorter
Even as AAA games increase in price, they get shorter
Because 3D content (art and programming) simply costs too much
AND now many more players like “open world” games, with lots of possibilities, as opposed to linear games, with strictly limited possibilities
Some content isn’t used
So more content overall is required per minute of actual play
Everything is getting more complicated, with online play

Human opposition
In games with human opposition, the opponent(s) provide much of the “content”
Humans are expert, and unpredictable, and fascinating, in ways computers cannot be
Yet they also provide opportunities for “yomi”, reading the opponent’s intentions, that computers cannot provide (being too predictable)
This is why a person can play a tabletop game hundreds of times yet still see and learn new things

RPGs
Much of video gaming derives from Dungeons & Dragons and other tabletop

RPGs
(Think of “dungeon” levels, experience points and levels, a single avatar per player, distinct episodic adventures, character advancement, loot that increases player capability, and so on)
In these RPGs, there’s human-controlled opposition (by the referee/”DM”), but it’s a co-operative game
Co-op is becoming more and more popular in both tabletop and video games

One solution to the VG content problem
Is, video games use human opposition to provide “content”
EVE Online has been doing this for over a decade
Every player is an independent potential ally or enemy
Players form corporations and alliances, and those larger entities also fight, somewhat like Earth-bound nations do
When video game players play as a team against another team, the human element provides much of the interest, the “content”
Think Team Fortress, Call of Duty, etc.

PvP (Player vs Player)
MOBAs such as League of Legends and DotA2 (DotA was the original, a Warcraft III mod)
The only way to play is in teams of five
World of Tanks isn’t a MOBA, but focuses on team versus team
The way to play is mostly-random teams of 15 vs 15
Clan versus Clan is more or less an RTS that pits players against players
These games are some of the most profitable today, even though “free to play”

A variation – non-dev humans create content
Some games let human players generate new content that is executed by the computer
Such as new levels, scenarios, puzzles
Little Big Planet (PS3) notable early example
New scenarios for Civilization
New levels for Unreal Tournament (Deluxe version provided level editor and many hours of tutorials)
Mods in general (though these are much less numerous because much harder to create)

Procedural generation of content
The computer generates new areas of play
In old-time Dungeons & Dragons you could use the tables in the DM guide to generate dungeons, monsters, magic items – procedural generation
“Roguelikes” have rebounded in popularity in part because they procedurally generate the content
Though that makes it harder on the player: it can get really hard to succeed

MMOs
Typical MMOs: content is created by the developers
And that’s why MMOs are so vastly expensive to create
Even then, some players shoot through all the content very rapidly, then quit – that’s killed the subscription basis
So now most MMOs are “free to play” – but EVE is not, because it offers more

MMOs
Some MMOs are now going to use procedurally generated content
The problem is, in a typical F2P environment players expect to be continually rewarded. Procedurally-generated content can often be quite hard-to-play content
In MMOs “a player challenged is a player lost” - will players quit?