PER CURIAM: Vision Financial Management, LLC and
Nelzarie Wynn (Appellants) appeal from an order of the Administrative Law Court,
which required them to refund the money they collected from consumers for
credit counseling services Appellants provided in violation of the Consumer
Credit Counseling Act. Appellants contend the Administrative Law Court does not
have the power to grant the Department of Consumer Affairs a refund. We agree
and reverse that portion of the order based on Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
reasoning set forth in South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs v.
Foreclosure Specialists, Inc., Op. No. 4749 (S.C. Ct. App. filed September
29, 2010).[1]

[1] Because we find the Administrative Law Court did not
have the authority to order the refund, we need not address whether Nelzarie
Wynn, individually, is responsible for paying the refund. Whiteside v.
Cherokee County Sch. Dist. No. One, 311 S.C. 335, 340, 428 S.E.2d 886, 889
(1993) (finding the appellate court need not address all issues when decision
on a prior issue is dispositive). To the extent Wynn argues she is not
responsible for any relief ordered beyond the refund, we deem the issue has
been abandoned on appeal. SeeR & G Constr., Inc. v. Lowcountry
Reg'l Transp. Auth., 343 S.C. 424, 437, 540 S.E.2d 113, 120 (Ct. App. 2000)
(holding that an issue is abandoned when the appellant's brief treats it in a
conclusory manner).

[2] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.