Really, I don't mind if they do or if they don't, but it'd be interesting if they did. Of course, not before too long, in a few years. I was thinking if they did they should probably put new attractions for their other games not included, like Kirby(and don't post that Brawl in the Family here, I've already seen it), Kid Icarus, Fire Emblem, etc. Any thoughts on this?

I actually mentioned this on Miiverse to someone
Since NintendoLand 1 was about R&D and EAD games ie first party, the next should be called Nintendo Land 2nd Party and include all 2nd parties like FE, Mother, EBA/Ouendan, Pokemon, and Kirby, maybe even a Stafy one

Digitaloggery
3DS FC: Otaku1
WiiU: 013017970991Nintendo of Japan
niconico community is full of kawaii!
Must finish my backlagg or at least get close this year
Welcome to my emassary of doom >: }

Why would there be a Smash Bros attraction? That's like saying there should be a Nintendo Land attraction. Plus, you can't really make a Smash Bros themed attraction without it being completely Smash, which is part of the point of Nintendo Land IMO

In a sequel the attractions should be based on new series, yes, but not all of them. How about a sequel to Zelda Battle Quest or Metroid Blast with new items or play styles? And we all know Nintendo wouldn't release it without a Mario game.

DLC for the first one is unlikely simply because they didn't structure it to have DLC. They'd have to do a lot of recoding to allow it to support DLC. Generally, games that support DLC are already set up to do so when the game is release, even if the DLC itself hasn't been created.