Thought you might be interested in an article posted
by John Kooiman about the TR-3B gravity warping technology. I will depend
on my esteemed friends and colleges who actually understand physics to
rebut or support his premise. Love to hear your thoughts. After the revelation
about the USAF's saucer programs in the last few months, things are getting
more interesting. Especially as I stated 3 years ago that we had researched,
reverse engineered, and built many saucer type prototypes since the 50s.

Ed Fouche
Efouche@satx.rr.com
210 681-2595

_____

From John Kooiman
john.kooiman@home.com

TR-3B Antigravity Physics Explained

To be correct, I probably should say, "TR-3B Antigravity
Physics Explained, insofar as General Relativity can be considered an explanation
for gravity."

Many readers of this list are probably already familiar with
Edgar Fouche's description of the USA's Top Secret TR-3B triangular shaped
nuclear powered aerospace craft. If not, read about it here: http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm

Mr. Fouche describes the TR-3B's propulsion system as follows:

"A circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field
Disrupter, surrounds the rotatable crew compartment and is far ahead of
any imaginable technology... The plasma, mercury based, is pressurized
at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin, and accelerated
to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting gravity
disruption.

The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or neutralizes
the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89 percent...

The current MFD in the TR-3B causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely
light, and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet ...My sources
say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots
can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction
in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.

The crew of the TR-3B should be able to comfortable take up to 40Gs...
Reduced by 89%, the occupants would feel about 4.2 Gs.

The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at each
bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle
until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who knows how fast
it can go!..."

I was skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claims when I first read them, as I'm sure
that many of you are, but I was interested enough to do further research
on what happens when you spin a plasma at high speeds in a ring (toroidal)
configuration. I came across a physics article (sorry, I can't seem to
locate the source right now) that described this exact configuration. The
article said that, surprisingly, the charged particles of the plasma don't
just spin uniformly around the ring, but they tend to take up a synchronized,
tightly pitched, helical (screw thread) motion as they move around the
ring. This can be understood in a general way as follows: the charged particles
moving around the ring act as a current that in turn sets up a magnetic
field around the ring. It is a well-known fact that electrons (or ions)
tend to move in a helical fashion around magnetic field lines. Although
it is a highly complex interaction, it only requires a small leap of faith
to believe that the end result of these interactions between the moving
charged particles (current) and associated magnetic fields results in the
helical motion described above. In other words, the charged particles end
up moving in very much the same pattern as the current on a wire tightly
wound around a toroidal core.

I thought that this was an interesting fact, but didn't see how it could
possibly relate to antigravity, until I ran across the following article:
"Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward, written in
1962 (available at: http://www.whidbey.com/forward/pdf/tp007.pdf). Dr.
Forward's article describes several little known aspects of Einstein's
General Relativity Theory that indicate how moving matter can create unusual
gravitational effects. When I saw Figure 5 in Dr. Forward's article, the
pieces of the puzzle all fell together. I instantly saw how the moving
matter pattern that Dr. Forward describes as necessary to generate a gravitational
dipole was exactly the same as the plasma ring pattern described in the
physics article discussed above! If Fouche's description is even close
to correct, then the TR-3B utilizes this little known loophole in General
Relativity Theory to create it's antigravity effects! Even though the TR-3B
can only supposedly cancel 89% of gravity (and inertia) today, there is
no reason why the technology can't be improved to exceed 100% and achieve
true antigravity capability!

In theory, this same moving matter pattern could be mechanically reproduced
by mounting a bunch of small gyroscopes all around the larger ring, with
their axis on the larger ring, and then spinning both the gyroscopes and
the ring at high speeds. However, as Dr. Forward points out any such mechanical
system would probably fly apart before any significant antigravity effects
could be generated. However, as Dr. Forward states, "By using electromagnetic
forces to contain rotating systems, it would be possible for the masses
to reach relativistic velocities; thus a comparatively small amount of
matter, if dense enough and moving fast enough, could produce usable gravitational
effects."

The requirement for a dense material moving at relativistic speeds would
explain the use of Mercury plasma (heavy ions). If the plasma really spins
at 50,000 RPM and the Mercury ions are also moving in a tight pitched spiral,
then the individual ions would be moving probably hundreds, perhaps thousands
of times faster than the bulk plasma spin, in order to execute their "screw
thread" motions. It is quite conceivable that the ions could be accelerated
to relativistic speeds in this manner. I am guessing that you would probably
want to strip the free electrons from the plasma, making a positively charged
plasma, since the free electrons would tend to counter rotate and reduce
the efficiency of the antigravity device.

One of Einstein's postulates of GR says that gravitational mass and inertial
mass are equivalent. This is consistent with Mr. Fouche's claim that inertial
mass within the plasma ring is also reduced by 89%. This would also explain
why the vehicle is triangular shaped. Since it still requires conventional
thrusters for propulsion, the thrusters would need to be located outside
of the "mass reduction zone" or else the mass of the thruster's
reaction material would also be reduced, making them terribly inefficient.
Since it requires a minimum of 3 legs to have a stable stool, it follows
that they would need a minimum of 3 thrusters to have a stable aerospace
platform. Three thrusters, located outside of the plasma ring, plus appropriate
structural support, would naturally lead to a triangular shape for the
vehicle.

I was extremely skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claimed size for the TR-3B, of
600 feet across. At first, I thought that this must be a typo. Why would
anyone in their right mind build a "Tactical Reconnaissance"
vehicle 2 football fields long? They must be nuts! However, the answer
to this may also be found in Dr. Forward's paper. As Dr. Forward's puts
it, "...even the most optimistic calculations indicate that very large
devices will be required to create usable gravitational forces. Antigravity...like
all modern sciences, will require special projects involving large sums
of money, men, and energy."

FYI: This article has been posted to KeelyNet. You have permission to post
it on your Web site, as long as proper creditation is provided.