54 comments:

Not so, tiggeril! You just need to find a flattering cut. Holds true for both of them.

A no-pocket design is key for the bermuda shorts. And you don't want them to be cut too big. Or they'll look like big ol' mens shorts. And look for one that is cut just above the knee rather than at the kneecap. And make sure your shirt is no longer than the waistband.

I'm glad to see that New York Fashion is catching up with Midwestern sensibility -- shorts mean less laundry in the summer!

I'll add, though, that if I have to look halfway respectable at work, which is rare, I am long-panted. When I go off-site to train, I wear pants. When the bigshots visit, I wear pants. Otherwise? Sorry, Ann, it's shorts weather. (Well, not today -- 40 and rain in May? Ugh!)

When we first had casual friday some years ago, men were wearing shorts - until the Memo came down. Now it's business casual. This necessitated some tuning up of the wardrobe, which had pretty much consisted of either suits or garage wear up till then.

Not if your job is basketball player. Otherwise, of course, it's much worse than these women's styles. And -- I don't know if you read the article -- but these women are trying to dress the shorts up by wearing sweaters. What's the sense of that? It's just perverse.

Another ridiculous thing about the article is the way it acts like there isn't a name for this kind of loosely cut shorts that come down to the knee. It's "Bermuda shorts," and these things have always been ugly, notoriously ugly. We're just in one of those fashion moments where there's amnesia about something ugly so that something unusual can be in style. These women will all look back on this and be ashamed.

Whats wrong with looking fat, so long as one is not? I personally have a theory that you can't look fat unless you actually are.

Jennifer: there are certain body types that can't be flattered and an attempt to flatter such would only lead to mockery e.g. not all black men can hold up a shaved look, some heads are just too bumpy.

If you follow the rule, 'you dress for the job you want, not the job you have', than these women want to be a bunch of smelly unemployed hippies.

(or Europeans on the dole)

(which is a bit ironic, given that each of the three outfits pictured (including the shoes and accessories) could measure their cost (though not their value) in the thousands.

My favorite part of the article, "Even in a law office, though, shorts are not necessarily an affront to convention. Last week, Melissa Gluck, a lawyer in New York, wore shorts to work with a tank top and a tiny black sweater. She conceded that her outfit might cause a stir if she wore it to court, but was quick to add that it would probably pass muster if she paired the shorts with a jacket."

Keep on believing that, and then complain loudly about a 'glass-ceiling' 5-7 years from now.

Well, XWL, in all fairness, the first woman is a co-host on a silly tv show as well as a style tv show and the second woman is a fashion consultant. For either of them, its more important to look fashionable than button-down-professional.

I have no idea what the last lady does, but she would look just as frumpy if those were pants.

I totally agree with you, though, about the lawyers, etc.. who seem to think this is good office apparel. They might be impressing the young secretaries but not so much the head honchos.

The the outfit the first woman is wearing (long sleeves and shorts) off of a rugby pitch really looks out of place. And can we take a moment to just say no to capris? I must be old-fashioned, but when I see capris, I think "high-waters," and this just looks like capri-creep.

No doubt this is dependent on what type of work one does, as well as the area of the country that one is in. Here in San Diego, within a youthful entertainment industry such as the one I'm in, it's normal for people to wear shorts at the office. There are a few guys whom I've only seen wear shorts and t-shirts, a couple of years running, to work.

I don't wear shorts into the classroom, but otherwise, I'm a practicioner of vileness. It's a solid 5 months of 98+ degree heat and 95 percent humidity here. I just don't have the body for a skirt. Men and women alike in the Deep Deep Deep South wear shorts and pants with stupid names like capris, clamdiggers, "pirate pants" (guys, they're capris, get over it), and pedalpushers. The second I'm out of the classroom, if I'm teaching in the summer, I change into something with less fabric.

Just curious, Ann, what do you think of the seersucker suit, our other adaptation to the heat?

When I worked as a patent attorney for a semiconductor company, most of the engineers were in shorts in the summer, plus, usually, T-shirts and sandals. This is apparently pretty uniform throughout the industruy, except maybe at IBM, where last I knew dress casual was more regimented than their old white shirt and blue suit look.

But the male attorneys were still in ties, and I would get a lot of grief from the engineers I worked with for it, esp. in the middle of the Austin summers.

Our secretaries might wear shorts in the summer, as might our draftsman. But not the attorneys, and not the VPs and most of the directors, even if they had done so when they were still working as engineers.

At last, a fashion area where I am not the fogey! Or at least not the one peering down my nose in disapproval.

I actually think that shorts a bit like the ones on the page Jennifer linked can be quite attractive on a woman, so long as she's not too heavy, although I, with my horrible fashion sense, also think something that comes down a bit past the knee -- more like plus-fours -- look even more fetching on a woman, when paired with flip-flops or flats or something (anything but heels!) provided in the case of flip-flops, of course, that the foot and the toes are attractive and well-formed. Saw a girl wearing something a bit like that by the ticket machine today, and thought it looked very good. The girl in the Neiman Marcus ad doesn't look half bad, either, only she's awfully skinny (and has a funny-looking "model face"). On the other hand, most people have ugly feet, so it's not for everyone.

For women, showing leg is of course hot, but skirts are hotter than shorts, unless the shorts are daisy dukes, in which case the hotness is equal, if the daisy dukes are properly cut. But I don't think daisy dukes are appropriate for the workplace. I think the solution is semi-daisy dukes.

The first woman looks fine, the third woman looks bad (I can't decide if it's the shoes or the vest) and the second woman just needs to iron out those crazy creases. They all look way to breezy to appear professional tho'.

I think it's fine to wear shorts to a casual work environment (but not a business casual work environment). I wish I could wear shorts and sandals to work.

Europeans almost never wear shorts except while doing sporting activites, so capris are the summer uniform here for both women and men. My teenage sons refer to the male style as "manpris" and wouldn't be caught dead in them. (Of course, I wouldn't be caught dead in the sagging-off-the-butt polyester basketball shorts they prefer, even if I were a man!) My main problem with shorts of any kind is they just aren't as flattering as a skirt unless you're built like a model. The one's from the NM link a few comments up would make me look laughable. Besides, I've already gone through the painful, preppy shorts stage once in the 80's. Why do it again? I've got much more sense now. As for wearing them to work: only if I worked at a gym.

On the stupid idea of "casual friday's" which John Jenkins described properly as "denim." If it's Denim Friday, not a big deal but what about pajama bottoms? I Loves me my pajama bottoms, is that acceptable? If those brittish schoolboy shorts are acceptable shouldn't PJ bottoms?

Not if your job is basketball player. Otherwise, of course, it's much worse than these women's styles. And -- I don't know if you read the article -- but these women are trying to dress the shorts up by wearing sweaters. What's the sense of that? It's just perverse.

I'm not a basketball player - not since high school. Just a system administrator who works in a very casual environment (where what you know is valued higher than how well you dress ) and lives in shorts from April till October. Even today when its 45 and raining here in lovely Northern Illinois. I read the article and I agree that dressing up shorts is pretty strange. Almost as strange as the sleeveless turtlenecks that women wear.

No jeans at work here and absolutely no shorts. Ties are preferred but not mandated - probably 2/3 of the guys wear a tie in the office. Having been raised on a farm and having been in the military and done some labor jobs in my time, shorts are very alien to me. I will wait until my legs are the size of pool ques and I have lots of hair protruding from my ears and am stooped and have a pot-belly so I will need to wear my pants way, way up high - then I will show off my legs and their fish belly color by wearing shorts. About half the guys I see wearing shorts are nearing that mark of distinction already.

I don't understand the commenters who say that you need better legs for a skirt than for shorts.

IME, a skirt (or at least a skort) is ALWAYS more flattering than shorts of the same length. There's no "cut" of shorts that beats the "cut" of a skirt. Mainly due to (1) the tendency for shorts to ride up between the thighs, and (2) shorts are more susceptible to wrinkling from normal walking and sitting.

I've completely given up shorts in favor of skorts, skirts, and sundresses (when this nursing mom can find one that works). And I don't think I'm a fogey yet --- I'm 31.

Shorts, it must be admitted, are more comfortable than a skirt of the same length when you're sitting down. A skirt rides up much higher and demands attention lest you reveal things you don't want to reveal.

Only a very long skirt solves the problem. Last summer there was a rage for very long skirts, and I think a lot of women realized that long lightweight skirts are the best alternative to shorts in the summer. Can we get back to that?

What on earth was wrong with my comment? It was a pop cultural reference describing what some people where "to work" that is in fact a whole lot more comfortable than shorts, and yet much more evil too!

Announcer: Introducing Mom Jeans, exclusively at J.C. Penney. She'll love the 9-inch zipper and casual front pleats. Cut generously, to fit a mom's body. She'll want to wear them to everything, from a soccer game to a night on the town.

[Dad frowns at the sight of Mom's new jean ]

Announcer: So this Mother's Day, don't give Mom that bottle of perfume. Give her something that says, "I'm not a woman any more. I'm a Mom."

Sippican, now I have two words for eggplant. Yay! But when I spent a few days in Paris, all veggie vocabulary fled my brain, and I had to eat omelettes with cheese for three days. It's all I could remember. I'm taking flashcards next time!

Ann, long skirts are nice, pretty. I'm just not that femme. I'd look like a 70s earth mother and I'm just not well for that. It's chinos or rayon capris in the classroom, baggy shorts on my tech support days. But I enjoy looking at the lovely women in flowing skirts, so yes, can we get back to that, please?