This morning's speech was great, I have another one for tomorrow night. Directed at the Park Service Meeting.

The Park was created by congress and the purpose of the park service is to provide access to it. Upon the creation of the park our ELECTED officials determined from 3 differents study acts that the adjacent lands to the park such as Pea Island were sufficient for wild life and the towns were private property. There are three types of property, Private property open for the public to develop, Park land, open to the pubic but closed to the development, and Wild life reserves, closed to development and the public.

The Park is for recreation. That's the law. The public was never to worry that the Park land would suddenly become private property open to developers or suddenly become wild life refuge and closed to humans. It's our park. The federal government purchased or in some cases stole the land from the public in order to create the park. The park does not belong to the park service. It is not park service land; it is park land. The park service like the police, are public servents, and they don't own the park land any more than the cops can own the towns they patrol. You work for us and it's our land.

It is outstanding that pseudo environmental groups would try to claim that closing a beach on an Island wouldn't have any economic or cultural impacts. Many of the well meaning but ignorant folks in the Southern Environmental Law center don't even know what they have done. question 1WHY is the public being punished for a government organization breaking it's own rules? And yet the government organization is being paid to enforce the punishment! Funny how the NPS failed to act and do their job to provide recreatoin and properly manage the park 39 years and counting, but they were so quick to act to prevent recreation.question 2Since when can the judicial branch use an executive order to overturn congressional law? Neither the executive branch nor the judicial branch have the power to change the law. It's unconstitutional. That's the basic foundation of Representative government, that laws come from elected legislators, not kings or judges. The constitution used to mean something. It still means something to me. Maybe not to these animal murdering fascist but it means something to me.

question 3Why is it, when the pretext for this mess hangs on the NPS's noncompliance with an executive order about ORVs, that pedestrians are banned from walking on the beach. How did they extrapolate WALKING from a failed plan to manage driving. Notice that's manage driving not banning it!question 4Before closing the federally promised beaches on an Island, did the police state bother to guage the economic impact BEFORE stealing the beaches? Has there been any compensation for the residence of the Island who have lost their liberty's, business, and property values?

It is a complete slap in the face that the best justifications the crazies have for destoying a culture, closing Americas oldest recreational park, and murdering thousands of other animals, isn't even science. It's correlation studies that are not subject to peer review and don't even use empirical evidence, there is no cause and effect. All they do is count populations and decide based on ideology what the causes are, and ignore whatever doesn't fit their conclusion. That's called pseudo science, a perfect match for pseudo environmentalists.

To say the NPS was so evil they'd kick puppies would actually be an understatement for these goons are murdering animals by traps, gas, and bullets. Is this 1984? Environmental groups are supporting the murder of animals and separating man form nature. And the public is trying to reverse it. The presence of people in the park is what protects plovers from predators. Now that we've been removed they have the idiot policy of just circling the park with kill zones. question 5Why is an arm of the executive branch writing up laws? I'm not choosing the plans a-f that is a forced choice between the lessor of evils. This is America's park belonging to the people and here is the plan. All beaches are open to everyone all year. Turtle and bird eggs get a 4 by 4 foot rope box placed around them just like they do in Nag's Head. Parking is free, ORV's are allowed where ever there are ramps. And there are no permits, passes, or hidden taxes. People and animals are allowed to be outside, image that. The last thing we need is some government organization in Brown Shirts saying Papers Please.

The NPS should be banned from every business on the Island except for one. I teach mixed martial arts across the street in the church, and I invite Mike Murry and any other NPS cowards to come practice for free. You won't even have to pay, just sign the insurance wavier and you're good to go.

Our elected officials agree with us. Our congressman, both our senators, our governor, and our whole local government all stand 100% behind open beaches. And yet they are closed, because of an incompotent judge who routinely has his decisions reversed for "basic legal error" and hypocritical environmental groups like Audubond whose founder was a bird murdering draft dodger from French Hati. Audubon has been caught selling property it acquired for birds, to developers for 25 million dollars. This is a land of hypocrisy. I feel like it's not America anymore. I come back from over seas in Japan, and I am still looking around for the place I grew up in, because I can't find it. This isn't the same place. Hatteras isn't Hatteras anymore, maybe America isn't America anymore. That stops here and now. Open our beaches as they were or leave because you are not welcome. The NPS should do what the name implies, service the park for the nation. If they'd rather be thieves then I'd rather they not be on the island at all. Maybe we should have a state park, run by elected offices who would be beholden to the people who actually live here instead of being decree enforcing communists who get a kick out of ticketing and banning the America public for any rationalization they can. Open beaches all year! This free society won't accept anything else.

All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.Sec. 7. Suspending laws.

All power of suspending laws or the execution of laws by any authority, without the consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights and shall not be exercised.

Sec. 19. Law of the land; equal protection of the laws.

No person shall be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the law of the land. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws; nor shall any person be subjected to discrimination by the State because of race, color, religion, or national origin

The original enabling act passed was by the US congress that created the parks. It designated the Cape Hatteras National Sea Shore as a Recreational Park. It created the park service in order to provide access to the park. Adjacent to the park they created a wild life preserve for Pea Island.

By law from the legislative branch, Cape Hatteras has public beaches closed to development but open for recreation. Judge Boyle used an executive order which does not have the power to over turn the law, as a pretext to over turn the law that created the parks by incorporating park closures within the punishment of the Park Service not complying with an executive order about managing ORVs.

1 It is already unconstitutional for a judge to overturn a law.

2 It is dually ignorant for him to use an executive order to do it because that is also unconstitutional. Judges do not make laws or change laws, they interpret whether or not people break the law. Executive order guide how a law pass by congress is enforced. They cannot reverse the purpose of a law and make it not enforced.

3 Not only is what Judge Boyle did unconstitutional on the federal level it also break the North Carolina constitution.

Article 1 Sec 7 states

All power of suspending laws or the execution of laws by any authority, without the consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights and shall not be exercised.

(oops our county commission DID give their consent to the decree. I just want everyone to know that those morons didn't choose the lessor of two evils, they chose evil. For without their consent the judge had no power to close anything!)

Our Park created by law is now no longer open when the NPS decided to close it through the tourist season. The will of the people is ignored completely. Our representatives have no say in the matter which is unconstitutional. In fact our Governor, Congressman, and both Senators and everyone of our county commissioners (our entire elected portion of government) all want open beaches.

Laws are supposed to come from elected officials not judges or kings. We have had a law suspended because of the whims of an activist judge and special interest groups.

Also Article 1 Sec 19

"No person shall be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the law of the land."

All people have been disseized of their liberties and privileges, and we have been exiled from our once public lands which are now closed to humans. That is depriving us of our liberty and public property.

Furthermore

Sec. 21. Inquiry into restraints on liberty.

Every person restrained of his liberty is entitled to a remedy to inquire into the lawfulness thereof, and to remove the restraint if unlawful, and that remedy shall not be denied or delayed. The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended.

I am exercising this right because my liberty to go to the beach has been restrained,and the promise the federal government gave me when it created the law that made the public beach has been stripped away by a Judge.

Lastly ARTICLE XIV

Sec. 5. Conservation of natural resources.

It shall be the policy of this State to conserve and protect its lands and waters for the benefit of all its citizenry, and to this end it shall be a proper function of the State of North Carolina and its political subdivisions to acquire and preserve park, recreational, and scenic areas, to control and limit the pollution of our air and water, to control excessive noise, and in every other appropriate way to preserve as a part of the common heritage of this State its forests, wetlands, estuaries, beaches, historical sites, openlands, and places of beauty.

To accomplish the aforementioned public purposes, the State and its counties, cities and towns, and other units of local government may acquire by purchase or gift properties or interests in properties which shall, upon their special dedication to and acceptance by resolution adopted by a vote of three-fifths of the members of each house of the General Assembly for those public purposes, constitute part of the "State Nature and Historic Preserve," and which shall not be used for other purposes except as authorized by law enacted by a vote of three-fifths of the members of each house of the General Assembly. The General Assembly shall prescribe by general law the conditions and procedures under which such properties or interests therein shall be dedicated for the aforementioned public purposes.

Our federal congress already designated the historical sites of the lighthouses and wright brother memorial. With that they also created our wild life preserve on Pea Island AND the RECREATIONAL PARK on the rest of Cape Hatteras Island and Ocracoke Island. For a judge to just decree this away is unconstitutional.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum