The classroom discussion came to a close, and Ashley began to pack up her books. Her English class had studied Oedipus, the mythical king haunted by an oracle’s tragic prediction that he would kill his father and marry his mother. Moments before the bell rang, the California tenth-grader heard her teacher announce a writing assignment:

You’re going to consult an oracle. It will tell you that you’re going to kill your best friend. This is destined to happen, and there is absolutely no way out. You will commit this murder. What will you do before this event occurs? Describe how you felt leading up to it. How did you actually kill your best friend?1

Ashley felt eerie. What a strange assignment! Why would her English teacher tell her to imagine something so horrible. I don’t want to do this, she told herself. Long after she told her parents, the awful feelings continued to churn inside.

The next day, Ashley’s mother called the teacher and asked that her daughter be given an alternate assignment. “I can’t encourage my daughter to write a story about murdering her best friend,” she explained.

“Certainly Ashley knows the difference between fantasy and reality,” said Ms Sawyer with a touch of sarcasm.

“Of course, she does. But when you ask someone to imagine how they would go about murdering a friend, you could stir up nightmarish feelings….”

“I have been giving the same assignment for years,” answered Ms Sawyer. Then she added the standard argument parents across the country have learned to expect: “No one has ever complained about this before.”

“That’s a shame,” responded the mother. “It seems to me that parents should be appalled!”

“If I give Ashley a different assignment she will be made to feel foolish.”

“Are you saying that she will either get an F or be made to feel foolish? Is this a no win situation for her?”

The teacher didn’t answer, and Ashley’s mother felt troubled. What kind of education was this?

Moral Confusion

Emotional shock therapy has become standard fare in public schools from coast to coast. It produces cognitive dissonance — mental and moral confusion — especially in students trained to follow God’s guidelines. While classroom topics may range from homosexual or occult practices to euthanasia and suicide, they all challenge and stretch His moral boundaries. But why?

“[Our objective] will require a change in the prevailing culture–the attitudes, values, norms and accepted ways of doing things,”2 says Marc Tucker, the master-mind behind the school-to-work and “workforce development” program now being implemented in every state. Working with Hillary Clinton and other globalist leaders, he called for a paradigm shift–a total transformation in the way people think, believe, and perceive reality.

This new paradigm rules out traditional values and biblical truth, which are now considered hateful and intolerant. (See “Clinton’s War on Hate Bans Christian Values“) All religions must be pressed into the mold of the new global spirituality.3 Since globalist leaders tout this world religion as a means of building public awareness of our supposed planetary oneness, Biblical Christianity doesn’t fit. It is simply too “exclusive” and “judgmental.” President Bush summarized the goal in his 1991 announcement of America 2000, the Republican version of UNESCO’s worldwide education reform program:

Nations that stick to stale old notions and ideologies will falter and fail. So I’m here today to say, America will move forward…. New schools for a new world…. Our challenge amounts to nothing less than a revolution in American education.4

Immersing students in imaginary situations that clash with home-taught values confuses and distorts a student’s conscience. Each shocking story and group dialogue tends to weaken resistance to change. Biblical absolutes simply don’t fit the hypothetical stories that prompt children to question and replace home-taught values. Before long, God’s standard for right and wrong is turned upside-down, and unthinkable behavior begins to seem more normal than obedience to God.

But it takes more than a twisted conscience to produce compliant world citizens. New values must replace God’s timeless truths, and no strategy works better than the old dialectic (consensus) process explained by Georg Hegel, embraced by Marx and Lenin, and incorporated into American education during the eighties.

The Consensus Process

Matt Piecora, a fifth grader from the Seattle area, was told to complete the sentence, “If I could wish for three things, I would wish for…” Matt wrote “infinitely more wishes, to meet God, and for all my friends to be Christians.”

Since each student’s wishes would be posted on a wall for “open house”, they had to be just right. Matt’s didn’t pass. The teacher told him that his last wish could hurt people who didn’t share his beliefs. Matt didn’t want to hurt anyone, so he agreed to add “if they want to be.”5

Another sentence to be completed began, “If I could meet anyone, I would like to meet…” Matt wrote: “God because he is the one who made us!” The teacher told him to add “in my opinion.”

When Matt’s parents came to the school, they noticed the phrases that had been added to Matt’s sentences. “Why did you add this?” his mother asked.

“I thought so, Mom.” Matt looked confused. Later, the teacher explained to Matt’s parents that she wanted “diversity” in her class and was looking out for her other students. But the excuse didn’t make sense. If the papers were supposed to “express the students’ diverse views,” why couldn’t Matt share his views? Didn’t his wishes fit? Or was Christianity the real problem?

“I try to instill God’s truths in my son,” said Matt’s father, “but it seems like the school wants to remove them.”

He is right. The old Judeo-Christian beliefs don’t fit the new beliefs and values designed for global unity. The planned oneness demands “new thinking, new strategies, new behavior, and new beliefs”6 that turn God’s Word and values upside-down. Directed group discussion is key to the transformation. Professor Benjamin Bloom, called “Father of Outcome-based Education,” summarized it well:

The purpose of education and the schools is to change the thoughts, feelings and actions of students.7

….a large part of what we call “good teaching” is the teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the students’ fixed beliefs and getting them to discuss issues.8

Matt’s last comment was especially threatening to the teacher. His statement, “God made us”, is an absolute truth. It can’t be modified to please the group. Therefore it doesn’t fit the consensus process — the main psycho-social strategy of the new national-international education system designed to mold world citizens.9 It demands that all children participate in group discussions and agree to:

be open to new ideas

share personal feelings

set aside home-taught values that might offend the group

compromise in order to seek common ground and please the group.

respect all opinions, no matter how contrary to God’s guidelines

never argue or violate someone’s comfort zone

First tested in Soviet schools, this mind-changing process required students in the USSR, China and other Communist nations to “confess” their thoughts and feelings in their respective groups. Day after day, trained facilitator-teachers would guide these groups toward a pre-planned consensus. Opposite opinions or ideas — “thesis” and “antithesis” — were blended into ever-evolving higher “truths”.

Each new truth or “synthesis” would ideally reflect a blend of each participant’s feelings and opinions. In reality, the students were manipulated into compromising their values and accepting the politically correct Soviet understanding of the issue discussed. Worse yet, the children learned to trade individual thinking for a collective mindset. Since the concluding consensus would probably change with the next dialogue, the process immunized them against faith in any unchanging truth or fact.

This revolutionary training program was officially brought into our education system in 1985, when President Reagan and Soviet President Gorbachev signed the U.S. – U.S.S.R. Education Exchange Agreement. It put American technology into the hands of Communist strategists and, in return, gave us all the psycho-social strategies used in Communist nations to indoctrinate Soviet children with Communist ideology and to monitor compliance for the rest of their lives.

Today, American children from coast to coast learn reading, health, and science through group work and dialogue. Most subjects are “integrated” or blended together and discussed in a multicultural context. Thus, fourth graders in Iowa “learn” ecology, economy, and science by “real-life” immersion into Native American cultures. They role-play tribal life and idealize the religion modeled by imaginary shamans. Seeking common ground with the guidance of a trained facilitator-teacher, they share their beliefs, feelings, and “experiences” with each other.

They might agree that “there are many gods” or “many names for the same god” and compare the exaggerated spiritual thrills of shamanism with their own church experiences. Which religion would sound most exciting to the group?

The consensus would merely be a temporary answer in a world of “continual change” — one of many step in the ongoing evolution toward better understanding of truth — as defined by leaders who envision a uniform global workforce and management system operating through compliant groups everywhere.

Zero Tolerance for Unwanted Facts and Logic

“The revolution… in curriculum is that we no longer are teaching facts to children”10 announced Dr. Shirley McCune in her keynote speech at the 1989 Governor’s Conference on Education.

Facts and absolute truth encourage people to think for themselves. But in tomorrow’s managed communities, individual thinking must yield to collective thinking. Factual knowledge must be purged, along with biblical truths that enable people to debate, argue, and resist manipulation.

Even math and science facts conflict with the new thinking. So, in the quest for “constant change”, students must learn “new new math” — math without math facts and computation — and fuzzy science based on feelings rather than the facts that would anchor a child’s mind to certain unchanging realities.

Students who disagree with the planned consensus may face ridicule and intimidation and be marked “uncooperative” or “at risk”. Many are assigned to more intense sensitivity training described by nice-sounding labels such as “conflict resolution” and “anger management”. Like “critical thinking” and other educational euphemisms, these labels all point to the dialectic process that molds compliance and shows little tolerance for biblical truth.

Christian children may feel anything but free to “express” their beliefs and feelings in such a setting. That’s part of the planned intimidation.

Follow God

To stand firm in a world that demands consensus, children need to:

Know and memorize God’s Word. “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind,” wrote Paul (Romans 12:2). If children don’t renew their minds with truth, they will be transformed by the world, not God.

Even Jesus was tempted to compromise truth and follow Satan’s seductive reasoning. In the wilderness, He demonstrated the way to victory: base every response on God’s unchanging truth. He answered, “It is written”, not “I think” or “I feel.” Wielding the sword of God’s Word, he cut through the deception and won the battle. (Luke 4 and Hebrews 4:12)

Memorization is key. Memorized truth and facts provide a mental anchor to the biblical world view needed to recognize and resist compromise.

Recognize the nature of the spiritual battle. In the Soviet Union, the dialectic process was used to create compliant Communist workers, ready to serve the state. Today, the goal of the consensus process remains almost the same: to create compliant global citizens for the envisioned “sustainable communities.” (See Agenda 21 at our website <http://www.crossroad.to&gt;)

Now as then, opposites (right and wrong, truth and lies, fact and fiction) must be challenged, merged, and redefined in order to crush resistance and establish the new unity, compliance, and readiness to flow with “continual change”.

The inspiration comes from Satan (1 John 5:19), who adapts his strategies to our changing times. At the dawn of history, he used twisted truths and seductive dialogue to challenge Eve’s understanding of God and His ways. Now he uses the same process in groups.

Wear God’s armor. The strategic truths outlined in Ephesians 6:10-18 will expose and counter every deception. Study the Armor of God chart (found on the “Armor” page at our website or in chapter 4 of Brave New Schools). It lists key Scriptures and shows why the six parts of the armor will expose and counter all the main lies of New Age or earth-based religions.

Then teach your children to pray through the pieces of the armor. Simplify each part to fit their ages. Make sure they know the Scriptures behind their prayer so that their faith will be grounded in God’s Word, not their imagination.

Count the cost ” because you are not of the world the world hates you,” said Jesus. “If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you.” (John 15:19-21)

If children refuse to conform to the world, it will reject them. Are your children willing to count God’s favor more precious than peer approval?

Whatever their level of understanding, they need to face the choice. “Choose this day whom you will serve.” (Joshua 24:15)

Make a commitment to follow the Shepherd. Paul did, therefore he rejoiced: “I count all things loss that I may gain Christ and be found in Him. (Philippians 3:7-9) He had dedicated himself to God, and nothing could shake his resolve.

Children who to follow Jesus may lose friends, but they will gain the best prize of all: the boundless love, life, and protection of our sovereign King. He will provide all the wisdom and strength they need to walk with Him. Remember, “He who calls you is faithful, who also will do it.” (1 Thessalonians 5:24) In Him they are safe forever and ever!

Blessed are you when men hate you,
and when they exclude you, and revile you,
and cast out your name as evil,
for the Son of Man’s sake.
Rejoice in that day and leap for joy!
For indeed your reward is great in heaven.
(Luke 6:22-23)

Endnotes:
1. This quote is written according to Ashley’s recall.
2. Marc Tucker, “How We Plan to Do It,” Proposal to the New American School Development Corporation: National Center for Education and the Economy, July 9, 1992.
3. See “The UN Plan for Your Mental Health” and “Trading U.S. Rights for UN Rules.”
4. Former President George Bush announcing America 2000, White House, April 18, 1991. America 2000: An Education Strategy (Washington: The U.S. Department of Education, 1991), 50, 51, 55.
5. Matt’s parents explained to me what happened and sent a copy of the completed form.
6. Lee Droegemueller, Commissioner of Education, “Assessment! Kansas Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA), Kansas State Board of Education, Topeka, KS, January 1992.
7. Benjamin Bloom, All Our Children Learning (New York: McGraw Hill,1981); 180.
8. David Krathwohl, Benjamin Bloom and Bertram Massia, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain (McKay Publishers, 1956), 55.
9. For a summary of the main points of Goals 2000, read “Zero Tolerance for Non-Compliance.” For practical understanding of the whole program, read Brave New School.
10.Shirley Mc Cune, Senior Director, Mid-continent Educational Laboratory, speaking at the 1989 Governors’ Conference on Education. Transcribed from conference video

The above illustrations are excerpts from Brave New Schools, which provides a practical overview of the changing education system designed to mold global citizens for 21st Century communities. Most important, it shows how to equip our children with the facts and truths needed to follow God in a world that demands a new consensus.

Abolish the Dept. of Education

End the ED, Support H.R. 899 to Abolish the Dept. of Education

On February 7, 2017, Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) introduced H.R. 899, a bill to abolish the unconstitutional Department of Education (also known as the ED), which was originally organized by President Jimmy Carter when he signed the Department of Education Organization Act on October 17, 1979. Rep. Massie’s bill, which is only one sentence long, states, “The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2018.”

On the same day as President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, was confirmed by the Senate in a rare tie-breaking vote by Vice President Mike Pence, Massie accurately pointed out, “Neither Congress nor the President, through his appointees, has the constitutional authority to dictate how and what our children must learn.” Massie further stated:

Unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. should not be in charge of our children’s intellectual and moral development. States and local communities are best positioned to shape curricula that meet the needs of their students. Schools should be accountable. Parents have the right to choose the most appropriate educational opportunity for their children, including home school, public school, or private school.

Among the bill’s original cosponsors, Congressman Walter Jones (R-N.C.) said of the bill, “For years, I have advocated returning education policy to where it belongs – the state and local level.” Jones added, “D.C. bureaucrats cannot begin to understand the needs of schools and its students on an individual basis. It is time that we get the feds out of the classroom, and terminate the Department of Education.”

Also in support of the bill, former Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) stated on Facebook, “I’ve long supported getting rid of the unconstitutional Department of Education. Republicans going back to Ronald Reagan have talked about abolishing it, but it never amounted to anything more than talk.”

Both as a candidate and early on in his presidency, Reagan advocated for abolishing the Department of Education. On September 24, 1981 in his Address to the Nation on the Program for Economic Recovery, President Reagan proposed getting rid of the Department of Education. “By eliminating the Department of Education less than 2 years after it was created, we cannot only reduce the budget but ensure that local needs and preferences, rather than the wishes of Washington, determine the education of our children,” Reagan said.

However, by the time he left office after two-full presidential terms on January 20, 1989, the Department of Education had grown even larger and continued to expand under subsequent purportedly “conservative” Republican presidents, most notably President George W. Bush and his disastrous “No Child Left Behind” program.

Of Massie’s bill, Paul further stated on Facebook, “We desperately need to release the creative energy of teachers at the local level.”

Although Massie’s bill does not specifically address what would happen to the many unconstitutional federal laws related to education, federal student loans, and other various federal aid programs to public schools that have been passed either prior to or since the Department of Education was created, the bill is certainly an encouraging first step in the right direction toward removing the federal government from education.

If passed and signed by President Trump, Massie’s bill would accomplish what President Reagan originally promised, and more importantly it would begin returning control of education back to parents and local communities.

Please send a prewritten, editable message to your representative and senators and ask your representative to cosponsor H.R. 899, a bill to abolish the unconstitutional Department of Education, in the House and ask your senators to introduce and cosponsor a companion bill in the Senate. Let them know that you want to remove the federal government from education and return control of education back to parents and local communities by abolishing the unconstitutional Department of Education.

Phone calls can also be very effective, and of course the most effective way to educate your state legislators is by making personal visits to their offices. Click here for contact information.

Thanks.

Rate this:

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 14th, 2017 at 7:46 AM and is filed under World Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Post navigation

Sign up for email updates

EDUCATE THE MASSES

“Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.”
Thomas Jefferson.

PATRIOTIC PERSEVERANCE

“It does not take a majority to prevail…but a rather irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.” ~Samuel Adams

A HOMELESS NATION

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. Thomas Jefferson - 1802

GOOD ADVICE

UNAVOIDABLE CONCLUSION

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out...without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, and intolerable.” FL. Hamer

INTELLECTUAL COURAGE

'Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death." S. Rasmussen

ARE YOU A FOOL? TAKE THE TEST!

A man is a fool who trusts his rights to lawyer, his soul to a preacher, his health to a doctor, his wealth to a banker, and his happiness to a government. By Anonymous

REASONS FOR OPTIMISM

“It is only human to seek reasons for optimism, and to find comfort in self-delusion. We have to believe we're going to be "just fine", because the alternative is too painful, and painfully unacceptable”…….(Unknown)

IMMUTABLE LAWS OF HUMAN NATURE

"The only way to maintain progress without chaos within a society is to have changeable social values that are tied to unchanging principles."
Marilyn Barnewall