I have finished LLPSI II some weeks ago and I've read, as I said some other times, a lot of Martial's stuff, some of Cicero's works (De Amicitia -just finished-, Academica Priora, First Book of De Finibus..., and now I am reading his Tusculan disputations -I am in the middle of the whole thing), Virgil's First and Second EclogÃ¦ and his Culex and Ã†lius Donatus' commentaries on him and his eclogues, some of humanist stuff, etc.

I would love to read Virgil. I mean, the whole Virgil. I would like to begin again with the Eclogues. I think they are easier than the Ã†neid, but it's only a supposition. I've the OCT, so I won't need to get my eyes tired when reading from my PC. I would like to know what is better to read at first, which is the best theoretical introduction to Virgil and specially to Latin poetry (meters, scansion, etc. I accept suggestions both BnFand Google Books in French, Italian, English, Spanish or Latin) and your experience with Virgil -because I've only read what I said above and it's not just but beauty and more beauty.

as a side point, the delphini editions are v useful for their latin paraphrases and notes; there are lots of them online. I nevertheless prefer hardcopy and was lucky to find a nice delphini vergil this weekend in Amsterdam: if anyone is in Amsterdam, there are some great classics books in a little second-hand bookstore which is two alleys back (i.e. north) from the Spui. here are some pics of the delphini vergil (remove spaces):

First, Luke. I knew those recordings from Evan's site and I like them a lot. But many thanks, since you've reminded it me. Here it's a presentfor you for the care taken and because you were the first in giving a response.

Chad. What can I say? You should have an incredible library, I guess. The same Fortune is not for me -nor money, I guess... Here it΄s my virtual one. Let us be serious. What I appreciate in higher degree is the book on Latin hexameter. I'll post specific doubts when they come. I "know" it by means of hearing it, but I didn't have any theoretical knowledge of it. I will read and work through it as soon as possible.

Speaking of Reading Vergil, does anyone happen to know an edition using the appex or macron for long vowel marking? I'm not worried about syllable length for meter, just naturally long vowels marked. I've looked around for quite a while and can't seem to find anything.

Gonzalo wrote:... I would like to know what is better to read at first...

Personally I find the Eclogae tedious in the extreme (#4 excepted). The Aeneid is another matter entirely. I started reading it with Pound's disapproval in mind, but after going through the Pharr edition I've decided that EP was not exactly candid about Virgil. No, Virgil isn't Homer, and Homer is the better poet, but the Aeneid has its own greatness.

... which is the best theoretical introduction to Virgil and specially to Latin poetry (meters, scansion, etc.

Well, Pharr's notes were very helpful to this beginner. I haven't read Servius's commentaries, they may be what you're looking for.

You might also consider Dante's thoughts and attitudes towards Virgil. His relationship to the Master is deep, and much of his use of Virgil can be understood as a commentary from one of the finest minds in the late Medieval period. As an obvious example, Dante's love for Virgil reveals itself throughout the Inferno, as does his critical sense regarding the older poet and his works.

Re: Meter. There's a lot of material on Latin meter, most of it dry as dust and about as interesting. The basics can be learned quickly, but getting good at reading quantitative verse takes some time and a lot of practice. You can also hear many readings now on YouTube and other such sites. Most of them are bad, but all are useful to the student trying to gain an understanding of the art of recitation.

Last edited by cantator on Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I have not had any problem from the three eclogues Ι've read. But, sincerely, Georgics seem to need of a kind of Master in Agriculture to be read. As for the Dante, I have not read yet the whole Commedia but I am refreshing my Italian by means of listening to to radio and reading from Leopardi´s Zibaldone and I wish to read more deep Italian in some weeks.
I'll read Servius' commentaries.

Many thanks again for your inestimable help.

Gonzalo

Last edited by Gonzalo on Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Not to change the subject, but does anyone have a decent way of preparing themselves to read the Comedia? I've taught myself enough Italian to read straightforward, non-literary texts, but I can see that I'm in way over my head when I try to read Dante. How do I make this transition? What sorts of appreciable differences are there between modern and older Italian? Is it mostly just the vocabulary (which I'm very weak on)? What's a good dictionary for this? The same goes for Petrarch...

It's funny that I much prefer reading the Latin works of Dante, Boccaccio, and Petrarca, because I have a much easier time doing so.

For specific information, our Luke (Lucus Eques) will tell you a lot of things, because he has studied Letteratura at Italy some time but I could give you some general information (in fact, links). For me, I would like to read again Ariosto'sOrlando furioso before take the Dante.

MiguelM wrote:Speaking of Reading Vergil, does anyone happen to know an edition using the appex or macron for long vowel marking? I'm not worried about syllable length for meter, just naturally long vowels marked. I've looked around for quite a while and can't seem to find anything.

Ehem... excuse me. We always forget our beloved Oerbergian editions.
Take a look at the edition shown here. There are some pages from the Ã†neid and the EclogÃ¦ available to be read. I'll order it from a book-shop here in Madrid.

Oh, do forgive my lack of specification: I meant of the Eclogues. I have the pleasure of owning the Oerberg edition of the First and Fourth Cantos, and it's been of immense value -- not only for the traditional Oerberg notation, but mostly because of the macrons. I did not know he had the same for the Eclogues!

thesaurus wrote:Not to change the subject, but does anyone have a decent way of preparing themselves to read the Comedia?

I followed (again) Ezra Pound's advice and acquired the Temple edition of the Commedia. That edition includes the original text with an English prose translation. I started by reading as much of the Italian as I could manage without reference to the original. I've since read the Inferno about a dozen times, and each time I need the gloss less and less. (I've also read the Purgatorio and Paradiso a couple times each.)

I've also spent some time reading La Vita Nuova and various poems by Cavalcanti. I can read modern Italian okay, but I'm more familiar with Dante's Medieval Tuscan.

It's funny that I much prefer reading the Latin works of Dante, Boccaccio, and Petrarca, because I have a much easier time doing so.

Latinate constructions abound in the Commedia. Pound saw them, noting however that they were not nearly the curse to Dante's poetry that they are to Milton's. Such constructions are indeed more natural to Italian, but you'll still do some head-scratching until you recognize Dante's Latinity occasionally intruding into the versification.

I've read some of Dante's Latin works, mostly the De Vulgari Eloquentia and some of his poems in the language (the Eclogae). His Italian should come relatively easily if you already have a strong background in Latin.

See Gonzalo's excellent list of materials for further studies. Be sure to visit the Princeton site, it's a great place for students of Dante and his works.

Thank you for your exceedingly helpful hints. May I ask where you are gleaning all this advice from Pound? I can't say I'm a fan of avant-garde poetry, but I love reading literary criticism from such minds.

thesaurus wrote:May I ask where you are gleaning all this advice from Pound? I can't say I'm a fan of avant-garde poetry, but I love reading literary criticism from such minds.

I wouldn't call Pound an avant-garde poet, he's been dead too long.

His literary canon is well-represented in these books:

Literary Essays - Includes the notable essays on Elizabethan translations from Latin and on early translators of Homer (French, Latin, and English).

ABC Of Reading - The first book I ever read by EP. I felt so ignorant after reading it that I embarked on a desultory course of self-study that's involved me for the past 35+ years. Yes, I'm a slow learner.

Guide To Kulchur - Not so well-organized as the volume of literary essays but still good.

Of course Longinus and Horace are must-reads if you're looking for literary criticism from the ancient world.

And if you'd like a bit of prescience from EP on another topic entirely :

ABC Of Economics - A rather disjointed look at money, but quite valuable as a spur to consideration. Alas, it's also almost impossible to find now.

As an aside: I started studying Latin seriously as the result of a double impact. At about the same time I read Pound I also heard Carl Orff's Carmina Burana. I just had to find what all that was about.

thesaurus wrote:May I ask where you are gleaning all this advice from Pound? I can't say I'm a fan of avant-garde poetry, but I love reading literary criticism from such minds.

I wouldn't call Pound an avant-garde poet, he's been dead too long.

His literary canon is well-represented in these books:

Literary Essays - Includes the notable essays on Elizabethan translations from Latin and on early translators of Homer (French, Latin, and English).

ABC Of Reading - The first book I ever read by EP. I felt so ignorant after reading it that I embarked on a desultory course of self-study that's involved me for the past 35+ years. Yes, I'm a slow learner.

Guide To Kulchur - Not so well-organized as the volume of literary essays but still good.

Of course Longinus and Horace are must-reads if you're looking for literary criticism from the ancient world.

And if you'd like a bit of prescience from EP on another topic entirely :

ABC Of Economics - A rather disjointed look at money, but quite valuable as a spur to consideration. Alas, it's also almost impossible to find now.

As an aside: I started studying Latin seriously as the result of a double impact. At about the same time I read Pound I also heard Carl Orff's Carmina Burana. I just had to find what all that was about.

"Ego sum abbas Cucaniensis..." indeed.

Virgil, Dante, and now here we go with Ezra Pound. Some links which I have to share with you:

I have not read Pound's poetry much, but his literary criticism is sometimes baffling. The things he says about Chinese make Sinologists cry, and some of his comments about Greek authors make me wonder how well he knew Greek.

Back to Dante... one of my interests is Old Occitan, a.k.a Old ProvenÃ§al, and the literature of the Troubadors. Dante himself drops into OOc in a few places in the Divine Comedy. One nice selection of works is The Troubadours of Dante which has an intro, text selections, a grammar and vocabulary. OOc should present no trouble to anyone who already knows a Romance language, except perhaps the seemingly random spelling fluctuations.

annis wrote:I have not read Pound's poetry much, but his literary criticism is sometimes baffling. The things he says about Chinese make Sinologists cry, and some of his comments about Greek authors make me wonder how well he knew Greek.

I doubt he knew either very well, not as professional scholars would know them. The monograph on Chinese character script is truly weird to professionals, but poets can still learn things from it (just not very much about Chinese). I imagine that his Greek was whatever Hamilton College offered at that time. Again, his linguistic abilities may be suspect, but his critical canon is sound at core and rather conservative. After all, nobody ever got fired for recommending Homer.

Gonzalo wrote:
Virgil, Dante, and now here we go with Ezra Pound. Some links which I have to share with you:
[snip]

Gonzalo amice,

Gratias multas ago tibi! I spent a couple of hours yesterday going through the Blast material, it had been a long time since I last saw those editions. My sincere (and belated) thanks for posting those links.

Nevermind, Cantator. It´s a pleasure indeed. I love those avant-garde movements and I myself have translated some manifestos of thenet.futurism present movement. Take a look here.

And, by the way, I am reading besides Italo Svevo (I´ve began "Una vita" and when I finish it I want to read "La coscienza di Zeno"), also Dante´s Comedia and this page is being really useful because offers great introductions and commentaries. I have a Spanish-Italian edition which I bought last week and I read three or four chants per day. First I read the Spanish one and then the Italian one. I think that Dante´s Italian is much more easy to me than Modern Italian (I did Assimil + Pimsleur and now I have a good skill on it) because Dante´s Italian or fiorentino is very similar to Spanish. As we are in a Classics forum, take a look at this beautiful article by Italo Calvino: Perché leggere i classici. I have enjoyed it.

MiguelM wrote:Oh, do forgive my lack of specification: I meant of the Eclogues. I have the pleasure of owning the Oerberg edition of the First and Fourth Cantos, and it's been of immense value -- not only for the traditional Oerberg notation, but mostly because of the macrons. I did not know he had the same for the Eclogues!

Whoa, what Ørberg version of the Eclogues? or cantos? say again?

And yes, on Dante, an annotated Commedia with Italian notes is what you want — full immersion, baby, and just as good as what the modern Florentines get. I fear I have no such book in mind, but doubtless a trip to an Italian bookstore online could yield the desired result.

Lucus Eques wrote:
And yes, on Dante, an annotated Commedia with Italian notes is what you want — full immersion, baby, and just as good as what the modern Florentines get. I fear I have no such book in mind, but doubtless a trip to an Italian bookstore online could yield the desired result.