I want to second this. It is interesting that an argument for untyped
languages often goes along the lines of what is Danny saying here is a
benefit of a typed language.
N.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Danny Yoo <dyoo at cs.wpi.edu> wrote:
> I do want to say that, despite some troubles I've been having with
> Typed Racket, it's still awesome. I'm building another prototype
> Racket->JS compiler, and because it's still very experimental, I find
> myself having to change the data types a lot. I'm using Typed Racket
> to code it, and it's been well worth the effort. The type discipline
> has been extraordinarily helpful in catching me as I'm iterating the
> design of the data structures. So thank you to everyone who's been
> contributing to Typed Racket!