Quick links

Britain must welcome the world's science and engineering talent

The Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE) has backed the Campaign for Science and Engineering’s (CaSE) call for an immigration policy rethink. Both organisations support the view that a more balanced approach to immigration is essential to maintaining the UK’s position as a leading, global hub for science and engineering.

In a report launched in the House of Lords last week, CaSE argues that current government policy, coupled with anti-immigration rhetoric, places the UK’s future economic and scientific success at risk.

The report, ‘Immigration: Keeping the UK at the heart of global science and engineering’, concludes that complex rules, unclear guidance, and bureaucracy are making immigration increasingly difficult for economically-valuable workers.

IChemE contributed to the report, raising specific concerns over skills shortage in the chemical engineering profession. The Institution also reported on the positive benefits immigration brings.

Alana Collis, IChemE’s policy manager, said immigration is deeply rooted in the UK’s economy: “Many flagship British companies owe their success to migrant workers and rely on international skills and trade. Companies choose to locate their operations in the UK in order to tap into British skills and expertise, but the choice is rarely just about British workers. The free movement of foreign labour is also important – both in terms of skilled engineers in the company but also skilled and unskilled jobs in the supply chain.”

Andrew Furlong, IChemE’s director of communications joined a panel discussion at the launch and emphasised the benefits of a diverse workforce in promoting innovation and global collaboration.

He said: “If Britain is to maintain its status as a world leader in science and engineering, we should welcome foreign talent. IChemE is calling on politicians to do three things. First, stop pandering to the prejudice stirred up by some sections of the press. Second, strip much of the complexity and bureaucracy from our immigration system, and third, bear in mind that major engineering projects take time.

Government must plan for the long term and avoid policy decisions that will compromise Britain’s prosperity in the decades to come.”

Evidence assembled by CaSE reveals the significant economic contribution made by migrant scientists and engineers. However, almost 2,500 applications were rejected in June and July last year, including 66 engineers, according to figures released by the Home Office.

The report concludes with 12 recommendations to strengthen the UK’s position as a leading global hub of science and engineering; including, scrapping the immigration cap for Tier 2 (skilled workers) set out in the Conservative manifesto – currently set at 20,700 visas per year.

Notes to media

About chemical engineers

Chemical, biochemical and process engineering is the application of science, maths and economics to the process of turning raw materials into everyday products. Professional chemical engineers design, construct and manage process operations all over the world. Oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, food and drink, synthetic fibres and clean drinking water are just some of the products where chemical engineering plays a central role.

About IChemE

The Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE) is the global professional membership organisation for people with relevant experience or an interest in chemical engineering. With a growing global membership of over 44,000, the Institution is at the heart of the process community, promoting competence and a commitment to best practice, advancing the discipline for the benefit of society, encouraging young people in science and engineering and supporting the professional development of its members. IChemE is the only organisation to award Chartered Chemical Engineer and Professional Process Safety Engineer status.

About the CaSE Immigration Report

CaSE is the leading independent pressure group for the science and engineering sectors in the UK and issued a call for evidence which attracted over 100 responses from organisations and individuals. It conducted one-to-one interviews and held two stakeholder meetings with science and engineering organisations, from the public, private, and charity sectors. The report was also informed throughout by a comprehensive review of the published literature.