AS is said and is (hopefully) known, the company one keeps is reflective of one’s worldview. Like-mind. And when considering how protective the EU is of its Mohammedans, little is more emblematic of said truth – believe it or not.

(#FreeTommyRobinson: As of 5/28/18, over 400,000 Sign Petition Demanding Release of UK Activist)

The four-decade political and economic relationship between Europe and the Arab countries of the Middle East, institutionalized in the annual European-Arab Dialogue, has spawned a virulent and hostile amalgam called “Eurabia.” It will not simply go away with a change in European Union (EU) policy. Rather, its roots are deeper. Indeed, how the Eurabia issue is handled today will largely determine Europe’s future.

The images of Eurabia are manifest in millions of people burning American and Israeli flags during the Iraq war and openly supporting Yasir Arafat, Saddam Hussein, and other brutal dictators. Eurabia is also discernible in the explosion of anti-Semitic activity and a lack of empathy for Jewish rights in various European countries. Increasingly, Jews find themselves under attack, chiefly from Muslim extremists and radicalized youth, and European governments and law enforcement agencies react to these violations of rights only tepidly and only after the sustained pressure of publicity. The Eurabian phenomenon can also be seen in the intimidation into silence of critiques of Islam and Muslim society, epitomized by the slaying in broad daylight of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who had made a documentary on the travails experienced by Muslim women within Muslim societies.

This pernicious merger began with Charles De Gaulle in the 1960s. De Gaulle saw that the power of France diminished with the loss of its colonies and he believed a more unified Europe would restore some French glory. In order to unify Europe, the continent needed to form an international bloc that could rival America. The Arab nations of the Middle East, unparalleled in their oil wealth, seemed to be good partners. Laying the foundation for this relationship, on November 27, 1967, De Gaulle said that French-Arab collaboration would be a fundamental element in French politics. Since then, France has adopted a highly amiable policy toward the Arab world and a hostile attitude toward Israel….continue your educational reading….

THAT being established, it makes total (Orwellian) sense that UK-based Tommy Robinson, a patriot and supporter of western values, landed in jail for the “crime” of exposing the scourge of rape-jihad ala Mohammedan grooming gangs (mind you, even as this plague catapults all across Europe), in juxtaposition to the imminent release of a stone-cold supporter and inciter to Jihad, yes, that Anjem Choudary – having served just two years into a five-year sentence! Indeed, in a non-Islamic-captured nation, he would be in jail for life. Agreed?

EVEN more so, know that one of the aforementioned is a productive member of society who actually works for a living, while the other – guess who’s who – receives a string of welfare benefits, despite his public crowing: “benefit payments are a Jihad-seeker’s allowance !!”

(Anjem Choudary has been recorded telling followers to claim benefits as part of their struggle to bring sharia law to the UK)

A controversial Muslim cleric who lives off benefits is urging his followers to also sponge off UK taxpayers by claiming their ‘Jihadseeker’s allowance‘.

Anjem Choudary, who in the past has planned to disrupt the minute’s silence on Remembrance Sunday, also openly mocked hard-working Britons, calling them ‘slaves’.

The Sun newspaper secretly filmed him saying Islam will overrun Europe, David Cameron and Barack Obama should be killed and calling the Queen ‘ugly’.

But today he said he had been ‘joking’ and his words had been misconstrued.

He also maintained that Osama Bin Laden was his ‘hero’.

The father-of-four takes home more than £25,000 a year in benefits and lives in a £320,000 house in Leytonstone, East London…..continue reading the horror show….

MOST significantly, none of the largess gifted to Islam’s barbarians(thousands upon thousands, and from the taxpayer trough) is an accident, nor is it happenstance.

NOW, as is always the case, and one way or another, be it this major Jihadi or that one, eventually, they find themselves in these cross-hairs – some of whom threaten this and that revenge. So what??

Choudary, who praised the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attack and the 2005 attack on London, wants Islamic law, or Shariah, to be implemented throughout the U.K.

In an interview, Choudary acknowledged he knows Belkacem but doubted the Belgian recruited fighters for ISIS, because he’s been in jail since February.

“It’s very strange to me that Belgium is putting on this trial at all. They’ve charged 43 people but only about eight or nine of them are actually in court,” Choudary said. “It seems to be a very politically motivated trial designed to tarnish the reputation of these Muslims.”

Choudary dismissed the fear that ISIS fighters will return home to Belgium and other European countries.

“Once they go to Syria, it’s really unlikely that any of them will return. Some have already become martyrs dying on the battlefield. However, many of them are having their passports revoked and are essentially left without a country to return to,” Choudary said.

He claimed it’s “fantasy” to think such fighters would come from the U.S. then return.

But there are already reports of ISIS fighters returning home to Europe and to the U.S., said Clare Lopez, vice president for research and analysis at the U. S. Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C.

“Some intelligence community officials have expressed concern that ISIS could have a presence in the United States. We know that any number of jihadis, perhaps more than a 100 from the United States and thousands from Europe, have gone off the fight in jihad in Syria and Iraq,” Lopez said. “We know that some of them have returned.”

Authorities estimate 300 Belgians have traveled to the Middle East to fight with ISIS. Muslims from other European countries have also joined ISIS. A recent BBC News report said there are as many as 3,000 Europeans fighting with ISIS in Syria or Iraq.

Israel-based intelligence analyst Adina Kutnicki said the concern over ISIS is well founded. However, Kutnicki told WND in an interview that the jihadists’ point of origin should not be the focus.

“Firstly, whether they are recruited in Belgium, or any other Western nation, is not the issue. The fact that Islamic jihad has come full circle – spreading its wings from the Mideast, back into Europe, only to re-enter the Mideast – is in order to fulfill the main mandate. That’s the reestablishment of the caliphate,” Kutnicki said.

Former Air Force counter-intelligence officer and terrorism analyst Dave Gaubatz said any effort to downplay the ISIS threat to the U.S. is seriously misguided.

“ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups, motivated by their Islamic ideology, are the world’s most dangerous threat. ISIS has money, followers, a military and a strategy for world conquest,” Gaubatz said.

Lopez emphasized ISIS fighters returning to Europe and the U.S. have two distinct advantages…..and so on and so forth….

BUT despite all of the consistent evidence attesting to the self-immolation of Europe (with approximately a decade to go before America follows suit, that is, if patriots don’t fight back), the fact remains that Mohammedan Choudary “deserves” credit for telling it like it is.

IN other words, he isn’t pretending that what is isn’t; that Islam is compatible with democracy (a contemptible lie, in and of itself); that followers of Islam don’t hate “infidels”, and that the main goal of all of its true adherents isn’t one and the same – the application of Sharia Law over every single nation!

BOTTOM LINE:

PATRIOTS, wherever you reside in the west, it is what it is. Alas, just get busy and take back what is yours – before the (west’s) lights go out!!

When are we going to start talking about America’s history with Islam? Who said this, to whom, when, why and what have we ever done about it? Would you consider this statement to be contrary to our Constitution, our way of life, a danger to our National/Homeland Security and the preservation of our Constitution? Would you think these are words of an enemy? Surely, both the House and Senate studied this but where are the reports?
“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

This statement was a part of a March 28, 1786, letter from John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, the United States Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Continental Congress, concerning their conversation with Tripoli’s to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman as to why his pirates/terrorists hijacked our merchant ships, stole the ships and cargo while holding the sailors for ransom. (Source: Founders Online: http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-09-02-0315

Just Google March 28, 1786, letter from John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to John Jay

Why are we failing to mention the obvious issues in the 1786 letter that still exists today? Here are the main points in 1786; are they the same today with the Muslim Brotherhood in America and their plan they wrote to destroy us?
a. “it was founded on the Laws of their prophet”;
b. “that it was written in their Koran”;
c. “that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners”;
d. “that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and”;
e. “to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and”;
f. “that every musselman [muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
g. “that it was a law that the first who boarded an Enemy’s Vessell should have one slave more than his share with the rest”;
h. “which operated as an incentive to the most desperate Valour and Enterprize;
i. “that it was the Practice of their Corsairs to bear down upon a ship;
j. for each sailor to take a dagger in each hand, and another in his mouth, and leap on board, which so terrified their Enemies that very few ever stood against them.”
k. “That he verily believed the Devil assisted his Countrymen, for they were almost always successful.

Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration!
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unlawful means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited

CHAPTER 2-QUALIFICATIONS FOR ADMISSION OF ALIENS; TRAVEL CONTROL OF CITIZENS AND ALIENS

212 GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY

(3) SECURITY AND RELATED GROUNDS.-

(iii) any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means, is inadmissible.

In my opinion… There has to be a Full Scale War Against Islam IMMEDIATELY! Otherwise there will not be many sane, decent places in the World to live! And whoever if funding these Neo-Pagans must be incarcerated & Prosecuted for Crimes Against Humanity! Starting with George Soros & Barack Obama!