"Bamboozle"
originally a slang or cant word, perhaps Scottish
from bombaze: "perplex,"
or Fr. embabuiner: "to make a fool
(baboon) of" (Online Etymology Dictionary);
"to deceive or get the better of (someone) by
trickery, flattery, or the like; hoodwink;
to practice trickery or deception (Random House Dictionary).
This Blog is one citizen's attempt to speak forthrightly
and to question those who
would bombastically deceive
and mislead the public.

Publius Speaks

Become A Follower

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Winter is
beginning to take its toll.Ask anyone
how they are doing, and they will invariably respond with a remark about the
winter weather, with a hope that it will soon come to an end!It has been a terribly brutal winter, and Punxsutawney
Phil had no mercy as to its ending – ‘6 more weeks’ he predicted on Feb. 2nd.Even longer, if you believe the extreme
pessimists, or some of our weather forecasters.

This should
come as no surprise to us.The planet
earth is reeling from an attack on its atmosphere.“Air pollution is the introduction of
particulates, biological molecules, or other harmful materials into the Earth's
atmosphere, possibly causing disease, death to humans, damage to other living
organisms such as food crops, or the natural or built environment.The atmosphere is a complex natural gaseous
system that is essential to support life on planet Earth. Stratospheric ozone
depletion due to air pollution has been recognized as a threat to human health
as well as to the Earth's ecosystems.Indoor
air pollution and urban air quality are listed as two of the world's worst
toxic pollution problems in the 2008 Blacksmith Institute World's Worst Polluted Places report. According to the 2014 WHO report, air
pollution in 2012 caused the deaths of around 7 million people worldwide.”(Wikipedia).

Geenpeace.org
spells it out a bit more: “Although carbon dioxide is the most significant
greenhouse gas in terms of human emissions, human activity is also adding
others to the atmosphere that are even more effective at trapping heat. The
Kyoto Protocol covers the emissions of five gases besides carbon dioxide:
methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and
sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).”

It’s quite
surprising, and scary, that there are still those in leadership positions who
refuse to face reality, and thus refuse to do anything about pollution of the
atmosphere.As we know too well, these
human ostriches are hiding from a reality that scientists are proclaiming
loudly and urgently.Why do these
politicians continue to argue against the fact that human beings and human
enterprises have helped to get us to this point?Why do they continue to deny the effect of
chemicals and gases on the atmosphere when they know perfectly well that
chemicals and gases have the power to influence our immediate environment and
our own bodies to a life-changing extent?

Before we
answer these questions, let us refer to some examples of the effects of
chemicals on our lives and our immediate environment.

·First,
let’s be clear that the chemicals causing emissions into the atmosphere are
already affecting our immediate environment before they even ascend into the
ozone layer.Consider this from
sfgate.com:“Although the atmosphere
includes a layer of ozone, ground-level ozone is harmful. Not only does it add
to global warming, ground-level ozone is detrimental to human health by causing
or worsening respiratory problems. In addition, it negatively impacts
ecosystems by damaging vegetation. Each year, ozone causes $500 million worth
of reduced crops, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Factories involved with industrial processes, like manufacturing metals or
chemical solvents, contribute to ground-level ozone production. Power plants,
vehicle emissions and burning fossil fuels also produce ozone. Although these
processes do not directly release ozone, they produce nitrogen and volatile
organic chemicals. When these chemicals combine in the presence of sunlight,
they form ozone” at ground level.

·Why
was DDT banned?It was a heavily used pesticide
that was used generally throughout the Western World prior to 1972.It made people ill.It killed flora and fauna.It killed people.More specifically, it is likely to:

oBe a probable
human carcinogen

oDamage the liver

oTemporarily
damage the nervous system

oReduce
reproductive success

oCause liver
cancer

oDamage
reproductive system

·What
are some of the results of chemo-therapy in the attempt to kill cancer?It’s so toxic that an incredible protocol has
grown up around its administration.It’s
so toxic that people often say that the treatment is worse than the
cancer.It’s so toxic that recipients
often vomit, feel weak, lose their ambition, and lose their hair.It is so powerful that it often kills cancer
– a good result all-in-all, but let us not forget that cancer is a malignancy
that requires a devastating treatment to kill it.Those chemicals are strong – and not just
strong; they are overwhelmingly invasive.

·Some
of those cancer-curing chemicals are now being used to attack and retard other
physical illnesses like the auto-immune disease, Multiple Sclerosis.Some
physicians are now using a cancer drug as chemo-therapy for some MS patients in
the early stage of the disease to retard the process of the killing off of
cells in the myelin sheath of the brain, which lesions are the loci of MS
symptoms.Again, the strength of these
drugs administered intravenously, is strong leaving the recipients with some of
the same symptoms that cancer patients often suffer.

·Have
you ever thought about those TV ads for strong drugs that have myriad side
effects announced?Other than the
obvious requirement that such drugs must be advertised with side effects made
clear, there is a message here about the effects of strong chemicals on one’s
body.Drugs today are stronger than
ever, and the chemicals that go into them are ever more toxic for the human
body.

·Then
we come to illegal drugs taken by some people as “recreational” or
“mind-blowing” or just plain fun.Here
again, we find a basic denial of their devastating effects upon the human body
and mind.Even when we see people
wasting away, or displaying effects like speech difficulty or memory recall
challenges, or an effect upon motor skills, there is denial of what the drug –
like heroin, ecstasy, hash or pot – is causing over time.Of course, addiction to some prescription
drugs can end up with the same effects – oxycodone and Xanax - to name just
two.

·But
let’s not stop there.Let’s move on to
farming; dairy farming.In his book,
“Republic, Lost”, Lawrence Lessig talks about the government subsidies that are
given out to protect certain products or crops such as sugar and corn.He states that such government subsidies are
harmful to small farmers and even to cows!Then he launches into a story about cows not digesting corn well,
farmers feeding them corn because it’s cheap, and having to supplement their
feed with antibiotics because as cows eat corn, certain bugs brew in the poorly
digested mix stewing in the cow stomachs.Farmers use 25 million pounds of antibiotics a year or eight times the
amount consumed by humans.And guess
what?This overuse of antibiotics causes
the growth of superbugs with resistance to the original antibiotics, so guess
what children are drinking in their milk these days?E coli and salmonella.So, we should expect to hear about a three-year-old
who died after eating a hamburger and a 22-year-old dance instructor who can no
longer walk.

·Chemicals
in our food and beverages in quantities far exceeding anything resembling
reasonable amounts (if there are any reasonable amounts for some of these
chemicals like phenylketonurics which contain phenylalanine, aspartame and
potassium benzoate, etc.).Are these
chemicals necessary; are they safe; are they having side effects we have not
even considered?We have to ask, is
there any connection between the growth of heavy chemicals in our food and
beverages and in our water that have any connection to the spike in diseases
like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, MS,and
in a condition like autism?

·Finally,
we must point to chemical spills, chemical uses in natural gas exploration
(hydro-fracking), many oil spills, explosions; and, the leaking or dumping of
industrial effulgence in streams and lakes, lead in old house paint, asbestos
left over in older houses and the left-over deposits of chemicals from old
chemical plants over which housing developments have been constructed (with cancer
outbreaks in those areas are much, much higher).

My
point?My point is that we are already experiencing in these
attacks upon our own bodies and minds and our immediate living environment, the
deleterious effects of chemicals and industrial wastes.A similar assault is taking place in our
atmosphere above the disasters created right here on the Earth, and yet somehow
the non-thinkers and non-listeners find a difference between the chemicals
attacking us here and the chemicals and effulgence attacking our atmosphere.Somehow, nitrous oxide or bromine does not
wreak upon the ozone layer and the atmosphere what heroin or anti-cancer
chemicals or DDT do to our bodies.It is
a shameful lack of logic and common sense - to say nothing about denial of
scientific method – for the climate change deniers to keep us in a state of
denial and non-action so that our planet screams out with heat records and
winter monster storms and low temperature records taking their inevitable toll
on our quality of life and our well-being.Why do politicians continue to deny the effect of chemicals and gases on
the atmosphere when they know perfectly well that chemicals and gases have the
power to influence our immediate environment and our own bodies to a
life-changing extent?

We are being
bamboozled by the oil and fossil fuel industrialists.They know that denial and delay are not just
to be contrary.They know that this is
part of their plan to keep us
dependent on fossil fuels for as long as it takes to make many more billions of
dollars (as the Koch Brothers have been heard to admit).This is not just a denial of climate change;
this is their approach to milking us of dollars that go into their pockets and
their industries and their indulgences.

Let me just
remind you briefly of the positions and actions taken by the Koch Brothers:

“Charles G.
Koch and David H. Koch have a vested interest in delaying climate action:
they've made billions from their ownership and control of Koch Industries, an
oil corporation that is the second largest privately-held company in America
(which also happens to have an especially poor environmental record). It's
timely that more people are now aware of Charles and David Koch and just what
they're up to. A growing awareness of these oil billionaires' destructive
agenda has led to increased scrutiny and resistance from people and
organizations all over the United States.

“The Koch
brothers, their family members, and their employees direct a web of financing
that supports conservative special interest groups and think-tanks, with a
strong focus on fighting environmental regulation, opposing clean energy
legislation, and easing limits on industrial pollution. This money is typically
funneled through one of three "charitable" foundations the Koch’s
have set up: the Claude R. Lambe Charitable Foundation; the Charles G. Koch
Charitable Foundation; and the David H. Koch Charitable Foundation.

Total Koch money to the Climate Denial Machine, 1997-2011 =$67,042,064.”(GreenPeace.com)

In 2013, the
Koch’s enlisted “Republicans to make it unlikely any bills regulating carbon
emissions ever become law, and because they are requiring accompanying off-setting
tax cuts, they guarantee their anti-climate change policies will remain the law
of the land. The Koch brothers’ pledge is the work of their tax-exempt
Americans for Prosperity, and the “No Climate Tax” has successfully prevented
Republican lawmakers from addressing climate change particularly by thwarting
efforts to control greenhouse-gas emissions by killing cap-and-trade energy
bills in the Senate.

The No
Climate Tax pledge…garnered signatures from 411 lawmakers nationwide including
the entire House Republican leadership,one-third of the members of the House of Representatives, and a quarter
of U.S. senators. According to a New York Times report on the Koch pledge,
“Since most solutions to the problem of greenhouse-gas emissions require costs
to the polluters and the public, the pledge essentially commits those who sign onto
it to vote against nearly any meaningful bill regarding global warning, and
acts as yet another roadblock to action.” Roadblock is putting it mildly, and
it means regardless the threats from climate change, there is little Americans
can expect from Republicans in the way of relief because they are beholden to
follow directions from the Koch’s and their source of power ALEC.”

In a
complicated ruling June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Koch
Brothers by not overturning the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gasses.The utility industry, the Chamber of
Commerce, and 13 states led by Texas argued that the EPA does not have the
legal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, but by a vote of 7-2, the
court ruled that the EPA does have the authority to regulate emissions at
facilities that already release pollutants.”(politicususa.com)

Nonetheless,
there is still the basic factor that the SCOTUS has ruled that individuals (and
corporations) can continue to give huge amounts to these foundations and
think-tanks and PACs anonymously, so that the public will not generally know
who or what is backing the deniers.

In an
article written for HuffingtonPost.com, dated 10/02/2014, Mike Lux reminds us:

“It is no wonder why the Koch brothers hold their political
retreats with their fellow millionaires and billionaires in highly secretive
sessions, the things they say and the agenda they lay out, while ‘inspiring’ to
Mitch McConnell, is repulsive to most Americans.They say that they want to decrease
regulations so they can make more profit’.”

“Even
more absurd is their offensive overall agenda (laid out clearly and
unequivocally at the Koch secret meeting at Rancho Mirage in California in June
of 2014).The Koch’s VP for Policy and
Research described “an ideal society where the only government would be the
military, police, and court system. Government is thus limited to a small but
absolutely critical number of tasks, basically keeping our neighborhoods and
cities safe from crime, defending our country from those who might violate our
national territories, our commerce at sea, and providing justice in a fair and
apolitical court system.In this ideal system,
there would be no water safety protections, no national park system, no public
roads and bridges.There would not be
taxes on corporate profits or on the wealthy at all.There would be no consumer, homeowner or
worker protections from Wall Street banks, big energy companies, pharmaceutical
plants, health insurance companies, fast food companies.”

So, the
climate-change-by-human-hands deniers will continue their quest to stop
legislation, to prevent new regulations and to block actions by the EPA and
others.The Koch Brothers and their
followers do not take orders from anyone, including the Supreme Court.They are intent on destroying their
opposition and they know that, in most cases, money will win, not hubris or
unfunded persuasion.

Have I thus written
this in vain, as one more meaningless contribution to progressive opposition to
money in politics and the rise to power of individuals and corporate entities
that make up an elite cabal of governance of this country, mostly done in
secret?Perhaps.

However, bringing
awareness of environmental dangers in any form to the public forum is never a
waste of time.Hopefully, drawing a
parallel of the effect of chemicals on our own individual bodies and minds will
serve to remind us that chemicals and gases with carcinogens being spewed into
the earth’s atmosphere are also exceedingly dangerous to our planet and our
planet’s atmosphere.Just as we have
made people sick, we are making our planet Earth sick and perhaps threatening
its very existence.After all, we are a
part of an expansive universe full of planets, suns and moons, and other celestial
bodies of matter.Are we too parochial
to believe that our planet, like others before it, might become too toxic to
support life, unless all its many systems and essential life forms are
nurtured, cared for and protected?

The Koch
brothers and their ilk, with all their earthly treasure and political agenda,
are as nothing compared to the vastness of our universe.The physical and scientific laws and systems of
that universe will determine our fate in the long run if we choose not to act
in the interests of the preservation of life and eco-systems that exist here
and now.Time is running out….