If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You have to register
before you can post. To do so, click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Please do not post any copyrighted images or content without permission from the owner of those images or content. If you are unsure if an image or content is copyright protected, do not post it. When posting images from Google's image search, be sure to utilize the ability to filter by Usage Rights. This is located under Tools > Usage Rights. Any materials that infringe on any owner's Intellectual Property rights will be promptly removed.

36 played one heck of a game in Jersey tonight. Why is signing him for two years if he'd take it beyond consideration for Gorton? It's not as if he's taking a roster spot away from some great young phenom.

That can be revisited in the summer. For now he needs to be traded for assets.

36 played one heck of a game in Jersey tonight. Why is signing him for two years if he'd take it beyond consideration for Gorton? It's not as if he's taking a roster spot away from some great young phenom.

Zuc been playing great hockey lately,he has overlooking like his old self,keep it up

Zucc needs someone to pass to. IF we could land THAT elite scorer then keeping Zucc makes sense. If not then all of the best passing in the world won't matter. He's the consummate playmaker living life in a supporting role.

12 points in his last 6 games approaching the deadline... what are you talking about?

This, plus a 61 point pace on this season which would match his career high. He's playing extremely well over the course of the last month or so after a slow start + inj. Based on production, his value was trending downwards to start the year but it's recovered by now.

Trading Zucc is a mistake. Yeah, he's 30, I get it. There are certain people who play sports like their 5 years younger. I think Zucc is one of them. Whatever return the Rangers get in a trade will have a ton of risks and the chance of getting a player better then they have with Zucc is very slim. Add on his manageable cap hit and it really makes no sense. Without Zucc on the first line, you are back to not having a first line. Getting back to the age thing, I think Zucc is in his prime now and he has a minimum of 4 years that I could see him playing at his best. Then you factor in the lockeroom, Hank, the fans and IMO they should just sign him, piss on potential, risky prospects or draft picks.

Trading Zucc is a mistake. Yeah, he's 30, I get it. There are certain people who play sports like their 5 years younger. I think Zucc is one of them. Whatever return the Rangers get in a trade will have a ton of risks and the chance of getting a player better then they have with Zucc is very slim. Add on his manageable cap hit and it really makes no sense. Without Zucc on the first line, you are back to not having a first line. Getting back to the age thing, I think Zucc is in his prime now and he has a minimum of 4 years that I could see him playing at his best. Then you factor in the lockeroom, Hank, the fans and IMO they should just sign him, piss on potential, risky prospects or draft picks.

Any time you have a guy approaching UFA, when you are a rebuilding team, you have to move him. Is he going to want to stay on a team with no chance of winning? He's 31 years old. If he's lucky he has maybe 4-5 years left in the league. He's going to want to sign a big ticket somewhere, and he's going to want to sign it with a competitive team.

Love Zuc, he's been one of my favorite Rangers ever. But everything comes to an end. Get assets to help rebuild for him while you can instead of losing him for nothing

Trading Zucc is a mistake. Yeah, he's 30, I get it. There are certain people who play sports like their 5 years younger. I think Zucc is one of them. Whatever return the Rangers get in a trade will have a ton of risks and the chance of getting a player better then they have with Zucc is very slim. Add on his manageable cap hit and it really makes no sense. Without Zucc on the first line, you are back to not having a first line. Getting back to the age thing, I think Zucc is in his prime now and he has a minimum of 4 years that I could see him playing at his best. Then you factor in the lockeroom, Hank, the fans and IMO they should just sign him, piss on potential, risky prospects or draft picks.

Trading Zucc is a mistake. Yeah, he's 30, I get it. There are certain people who play sports like their 5 years younger. I think Zucc is one of them. Whatever return the Rangers get in a trade will have a ton of risks and the chance of getting a player better then they have with Zucc is very slim. Add on his manageable cap hit and it really makes no sense. Without Zucc on the first line, you are back to not having a first line. Getting back to the age thing, I think Zucc is in his prime now and he has a minimum of 4 years that I could see him playing at his best. Then you factor in the lockeroom, Hank, the fans and IMO they should just sign him, piss on potential, risky prospects or draft picks.