Tag Archives: benghazi 4

Post navigation

The Dictator wants us to all shut the hell up and quit talking about Obamacare and Benghazi. Just hush. It’s not important enough to be part of the discussion going into the 2014 midterm elections.

SHUT UP ALREADY!!!

ZIP IT!!!

Obama made his comments Tuesday to a gaggle of well-heeled donors at a fund raiser.

“Yes, we can have a legitimate debate about does every government program work … [but] the debate we’re having right now is about, what, Benghazi? Obamacare?It’s not serious [and] is not speaking to the real concerns that people have.”

GOOD GOD Y’ALL…STIFLE YOURSELVES ON BENGHAZI AND OBAMACARE!!!

Obamacare, according to the Dictator, just doesn’t speak to the REAL concerns that people have…like how in the hell they can afford to pay more for their healthcare insurance…how they can’t see the doctors they’ve had for years…how in the hell they’ll ever come up with enough money to cover their newly sky high deductibles…why the cost of their prescriptions in many cases have gone into orbit up 700% over what they were paying just months ago and why they now have to make important and life altering decisions with a 15 member panel of bureaucrats rather than with their doctors.

You know…the thing is Obamacare just doesn’t “speak to the real concerns that people have.”

Given the more than a Mount Everest sized “smidgeon” of corruption over at the IRS…

It truly is amazing what happens to liberals when all their hard work at lying goes up in smoke. They simply curl up in a fetal position for a collective crap, roll about in it and start whining about the smell.

Benghazi…or in the case of Nancy Pelosi…BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI!!! Liberals have taken many different stances on Benghazi such as it not being a terrorist attack but a You Tube video that caused it but that was quickly proved to be a lie. They tried calling what happened to Ambassador Stevens, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith “bumps in the road,” but they didn’t get away with it. Then they tried to brush it aside as it was…”not optimal.”

Really? The terrorist attack brought about by the terrorists this regime armed, the weapons running to more terrorists in Syria, the intentional removal of OUR security team in Benghazi…replacing OUR people with the very TERRORIST organization that perpetrated the attacks resulting in the murders of 4 Americans was…”NOT OPTIMAL???”

Liberals moved on to asking “WHAT DIFFERENCE…AT THIS POINT…DOES IT MAKE???”

That from the “smartest woman in the world” who, I believe, was complicit in committing treason, missed the 3:00am (Benghazi time) phone call, claims she didn’t have time to read her emails or memos, whiffed on the Russian reset button, accepted a wink and a smile from a North Korean uncle killer…was unable to testify when called because…SHE FALL DOWN, GO BOOM and can’t recognize a terrorist organization when one is staring her in the face.

On the up side…she flew a million miles.

But…Liberals are becoming mentally unhinged over Benghazi and Trey Gowdy’s search for the truth because all their lies and cover ups are crumbling before their eyes. Remember when Obama said THIS???

What in the hell was former Deputy Director of the CIA, Mike Morrell, TALKING about last Wednesday under sworn testimony before the house committee?

Seriously…

WHAT THE HELL???

He agreed to appear at the hearing, to in his words, “Lay out the facts,” regarding the altering of the CIA’s Benghazi talking points memo because, again in his own words, “The ethical code under which intelligence officers carry out their responsibilities calls for total objectivity.”

What followed was, in fact, THE most SUBJECTIVE testimony, full of abject contradictions, he could have possibly delivered.

It was, to be blunt, nothing less than a stunning exercise in ass covering that left more questions than it answered including one very important query…

Exactly who’s ass was he covering FOR???

Michelle Bachmann, who doled out perhaps THE most pointed and forceful line of questioning during the hearing has her theory on that answer.

According to congresswoman Bachmann, Mike Morrell was, “taking the fall” for Hillary Clinton.

“She couldn’t have a better person to take the fall for her because Morrell was involved in rewriting the talking points as he was the No. 2 at CIA,” congresswoman Bachmann related to WND in a candid interview. Bachmann was submitting that Morrell was cleaning up the mess to allow Hillary, “WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE” Clinton to make a 2016 run for the oval office, “so, he can come in authoritatively [and] say, ‘No, that’s not the story. The story is the fake story we tried to push.'”

Perhaps but, Morrell would also have to be confirmed in 2016 and, the way things are shaping up for the 2014 midterms, even IF Hillary runs and wins, she may well be facing a republican majority in the house AND the senate rendering such a confirmation highly unlikely.

Yesterday, an 85 page “report” said to be “comprehensive” was released by the Senate “Intelligence” Committee regarding the September 11th, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi.

I am livid.

Not only is this report far from “comprehensive,” I submit it lacks intelligence and moreover, comments made regarding it by the lead Republican on that committee show a mind-numbing lack of desire to truly get to the bottom of the attacks and hold those truly responsible to account.

Saxby Chambliss, the ranking Republican on that senate committee said of the report that it provides, “needed and deserved answers.”

BULLCRAP senator…BULLCRAP.

It answers nothing as those responsible FOR those terrorist attacks have yet to answer for ANY of their actions.

In yesterday’s Weekend Edition, I outlined the desperation of last week’s New York Times attempt to provide cover by reintroducing that lame and false You Tube fabrication for the Benghazi attacks.

I also kicked down the door as to who would have HAD to be involved, why and to what ends.

I went so far as to expose the preemptive nature behind the cover story AND the actions of 8 Democrats in the house.

If you missed it…Have a look at the truly disgusting nature of those who would conspire, collude, commit and cover up acts of TREASON.

But, I said there was more and, there is.

To truly delve into the desperate nature of liberals, Obama, his administration, Hillary and the New York Times…One must fully realize how far the Times is willing to go and why.

Last week, The NY Times released an editorial regarding Benghazi and that You Tube video ass covering story stating: “Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”

The Times didn’t stop there.

Oh…SOMEBODY is TRULY desperate…

Last Thursday, they actually made a claim SO outrageous, SO absurd, that it defies common sense and DEFINES desperation.

As their latest effort at providing some sort of “reasonable” doubt for any upcoming trial of either Hillary, Obama or BOTH was falling apart due to REAL FACTS garnered from SWORN TESTIMONY provided by CIA BENGHAZI SURVIVORS behind the closed doors of the house oversight committee…

Last week, the New York Times garnered publicity by trying to claim that the 9-11-2012 attacks in Benghazi really WERE because of an obtuse, low budget, You Tube video that, essentially, nobody saw.

The fallout was decisive from their inopportune editorial.

Members of congress from both parties quickly derided the opinion piece as bunk, citing evidence gathered via sources under oath from house and senate hearings that pointed directly toward al Qaeda and their affiliate, Ansar al Sharia…al Qaeda by another name.

Many called the NYT piece what it was.

Cover for Hillary’s 2016 ambitions but…

I contend there is more to it than that.

Much more to it than that.

Before I delve into what that much more is, we need to take a quick look at the claims made in the Times.

First…

Here is the direct quote from David D. Kirkpatrick of the Times in that piece:

Of all the unfeeling and undeniably Un-American things…What took place, last Thursday in the House Oversight Committee was both inexplicable and unconscionable.

As the Father of Tyrone Woods and the mother of Sean Smith came before the committee, 15 of the 17 democrats on the committee…GOT UP AND WALKED OUT OF THE ROOM!!!

That’s right…as 2 of the parents of the 4 Americans murdered in the terrorist attacks in Benghazi came to the table to speak and pose their concerns…

All but 2 of the democrats on the committee…stood and walked out of the room.

HOW DARE THEY!!!!!

It was an act so cold and so callous as to usually be reserved for thugs, street criminals and the world’s despots who routinely ignore the plight of their victims and I’m not at all sure the 15 fleeing liberals last Thursday don’t fit neatly into that subhuman conglomeration of filth.

There is no need to try and imagine it.

It happened.

15 representatives of the people, stood and walked out when 2 citizens, thrust into the spotlight by circumstances well beyond their control, approached the committee to testify.

Here is a list of those democrats and, by clicking on each name, you can find their contact information.

Here we are, exactly 1 year later and while Obama’s supporters have taken to the streets to demand “JUSTICE FOR TRAYVON” none of them have demanded “JUSTICE FOR THE BENGHAZI 4!!!”

And why not?

Since Trayvon was a thug, a gang wannabe, a thief and a drug user it only seems appropriate that those who adhere to Obama, alphabet media included, are in the corner of the terrorists that killed 4 Americans 1 year ago today.

An attack on Syria, no doubt, was meant to divert attention away from the policies that led to the al Qaeda attacks in Benghazi but, Obama’s plan for Syria has backfired on him in an epic way.

Not only did he NOT get to launch his war before the dual 9/11 anniversary, he managed to hand center stage on the world stage to Putin and Russia in the process.

It is becoming more clear by the day that Obama’s policy towards Syria is directly tied to his failed policies in Libya and it’s going to take 2 articles to illustrate the dire depth of it all but…

On the eve of the day we were attacked by al Qaeda, not once but TWICE, I find it beyond disgraceful that our current occupier of the oval office is trying to gin up SUPPORT for bombing Syria and, thus ASSISTING…

AL QAEDA!!!

We are at war with al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda is our enemy.

Obama is trying, in desperation, to find enough votes from congress to launch an attack on Syria to aid and abet al Qaeda in taking control of yet another country.

It is, in no uncertain terms…

TREASON.

Obama says it will not be another Iraq or another Afghanistan.

Is he sure?

I’ll tell you what it WILL be…

It will be the same situation as it was the last time our government interfered in another country’s civil war.

It will be another VIETNAM.

Has John McCain slipped so far that HE doesn’t remember VIETNAM???

He was held captive there for more than 5 years. He was tortured there.

To this day, McCain is unable to raise his arms above his chest because of his injuries and yet, there is John McCain, willing to start the NEXT Vietnam…

Search

A federal judge rebuked the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday for discriminating against a conservative group, saying the agency was either lying or apathetic in its response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The day of the trading deadline in any sport is always the most cold-hearted day of the year, when players are uprooted from their homes and sent far from their families as part of an organization's relentless pursuit of a title or a rebuild.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a personal email account to conduct official business during her time at the state department, a move that raises questions about access to the full archive of her correspondence and raises the possibility that she violated federal law requiring official messages to be retained for the record.

Israelis are increasingly convinced President Obama is meddling in their upcoming election, and some observers predict the White House's alleged effort to undermine Benjamin Netanyahu could indeed wind up tipping the scales – in favor of the prime minister.