Re: Another readahead issue

From: Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>

To: fedora-devel-list redhat com

Subject: Re: Another readahead issue

Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:36:37 -0500

Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Not sure if I should have started a new thread, but...
>
> If you *are* going to keep or eventually revive readahead, it would be
> nice to deal with the fact that all the firefox entries in default.later
> are /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.3/, but the current firefox is
> firefox-2.0.0.5.
imo, avoid the mess, firefox could use an unversioned folder,
say, /usr/lib/firefox. I assume there's good reasons not to do this tho,
else the firefox packagin/maintainer would be doing this already, right? :)
-- Rex