If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

UsingEnglish.com is partnering with Gymglish to give you a free one-month trial of this online English training course. Activate your free month of lessons (special offer for new users, with no obligation to buy) - and receive a level assessment!

subjunctive (again)!!!

It says, "This use of the subjunctive is known as the mandative subjunctive or the jussive subjunctive and is said to be the most common use of the subjunctive in English. Other authorities say this use is much less common than that in suppositions or hypotheses (e.g. "If she asked for help, I'd help her.") and is often not found in UK English, not even in respected news media.
UK English often uses present indicative or even past indicative − which are both considered incorrect by many people in the UK and (prescriptive) UK authorities on language usage − or a construction with "should". Much time is spent in the UK in trying to prevent this language change well underway in UK English, and the use with "should" is arguably better because not considered as ungrammatical by most. Therefore, instead of writing No wonder the Tory Party turned him down as a possible candidate, suggesting he went away and came back with a better public image. as in the Guardian (which would be almost impossible to find in any US newspapers, which would always use the traditional go away and come back), it would be considered less ungrammatical to use should go away. Some authorities like Ernest Gowers even recommend the use with should (in UK English) instead of the untenable traditional forms."

What are your thoughts on the example given above? Would you say '...suggesting he go away...' or '...suggesting he went away...'? Before this I would say the latter without a doubt. But after reading this article, I'm troubled.

Re: subjunctive (again)!!!

It says, "This use of the subjunctive is known as the mandative subjunctive or the jussive subjunctive and is said to be the most common use of the subjunctive in English. Other authorities say this use is much less common than that in suppositions or hypotheses (e.g. "If she asked for help, I'd help her.") and is often not found in UK English, not even in respected news media.
UK English often uses present indicative or even past indicative − which are both considered incorrect by many people in the UK and (prescriptive) UK authorities on language usage − or a construction with "should". Much time is spent in the UK in trying to prevent this language change well underway in UK English, and the use with "should" is arguably better because not considered as ungrammatical by most. Therefore, instead of writing No wonder the Tory Party turned him down as a possible candidate, suggesting he went away and came back with a better public image. as in the Guardian (which would be almost impossible to find in any US newspapers, which would always use the traditional go away and come back), it would be considered less ungrammatical to use should go away. Some authorities like Ernest Gowers even recommend the use with should (in UK English) instead of the untenable traditional forms."

What are your thoughts on the example given above? Would you say '...suggesting he go away...' or '...suggesting he went away...'? Before this I would say the latter without a doubt. But after reading this article, I'm troubled.

I would say "suggesting he go away and come back".

If one says or writes "suggesting he went away and came back", then it really means that one is suggesting that the truth is that he went away and came back.

I agree with the article. As an American English speaker, I would use the base form of the verb in the situation outlined in the language article you posted. And this is not because I want to prescribe correct grammar. This is simply what sounds better and more natural to me. I would, however, take it further to explain why it sounds better and, therefore, why it's correct.

Use the "traditional way", as the article calls it. If you are speaking or writing for a U.S. audience, you can't go wrong. And though this language change is well under way in Britain, as the article suggests, you can still use the "traditional way", as no one is bound to criticize you for this. Still, if you want to speak and write British English, then you could use the "non-traditional way", but be consistent. If you want to speak and write American English, then stick to what we would refer to in this case as subjunctive. This is a very fine point, but nonetheless an important one. It's a fine point because it is only obvious and apparent that there is a present subjunctive in English when we use third person singular, in which case we drop the "s", and when we use the verb "be", for which we use the base form, meaning the verb doesn't change.

It's important that we be clear about what we will accept when we begin negotiating the contract renewal.

Re: subjunctive (again)!!!

If one says or writes "suggesting he went away and came back", then it really means that one is suggesting that the truth is that he went away and came back.

I don't think so, I would understand it as just a jussive subjunctive in historic sequence.

As a Brit, I would be more likely to use the construction with "should", though I do use subjunctives too. I would regard the use of an indicative ("suggesting that he goes...") as incorrect. Horrible, in fact.

Re: subjunctive (again)!!!

Originally Posted by orangutan

Morphologically it could be either.

IMO the verb in the sub is either present subjunctive or past indicative. Subjunctive is non-finite and not prone to backshift, right? I cannot put my finger on the subjunctive reading of the past verb form.

Originally Posted by orangutan

Yes. That is to say it could be, and that is how I would most naturally understand it.

Re: subjunctive (again)!!!

Originally Posted by svartnik

IMO the verb in the sub is either present subjunctive or past indicative. Subjunctive is non-finite and not prone to backshift, right? I cannot put my finger on the subjunctive reading of the past verb form.

We are talking about "went" (in the example I gave a couple of posts ago)? In my books the present subjunctive would be "(that) he go".

I am not sure why subjunctives shouldn't be subject to backshift. I would be interested to know if there is a rule to that effect. It is quite possible that I am wrong.