9/11 Truth - like it or not

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

--Arthur Schopenhauer, German philosopher (1788 - 1860)

On September 10, five years after the attacks, the BBC finally interviewed David Ray Griffin and actually gave him a fair shot at presenting his case - and boy did he ever.

He was incredible. Mild-mannered and down to earth, he spoke with both ease and conviction about the impossibility of the official version, contrasting it with the probability - indeed certainty - that the attacks of September 11th were orchestrated by someone in the government and the ensuing collapse of the buildings a controlled demolition. The man is a hero.

Griffin: The official theory about 9/11 IS a conspiracy charge - that 19 members of Al Qaeda conspired to defeat the most powerful military force in history and to bring down three buildings by hitting [only] two of them. So, it's a conspiracy theory.

Anybody who says what you're talking about is conspiracy theory and we know that conspiracy theories are nutty, they ignore the fact that the official theory is a conspiracy theory.

So, the question is, which of the conspiracy theories is true? And we judge that by which one has the best evidence. When you look at the evidence for the official theory, it all evaporates.

Its a good interview and good commentary from Shayler. Peter Hitchens is the brother of Christopher Hitchens and both of them are of the sort of corrosive, nasty, rude commentators we've had shoved down our throats for so long. Peter Hitchens had nothing to say but name calling.