I think that idea of where there's prima facie evidence that something has systemically badly gone wrong within a newspaper, the idea of sending a figure like that in, whose credibility is going to be dependent on not having the wool pulled over their eyes … is quite a good one and that the organisation where something has gone wrong should bear the cost of that.

The state of the law is now in the absurd position of disallowing racial quotas, but virtually guaranteeing conviction for those who do not adhere to racial quotas on the grounds that the very fact of nonadherence is prima facie evidence of racial discrimination.

Then isn't the fact that NYC public schools are structuring their salaries as if seniority made a big difference -- paying 50% more money to more-senior teachers who aren't any better -- prima facie evidence of mismanagement?