Economic damage. Leafy spurge has infested more
than one million hectares in North America since its introduction approximately
200 years ago (Alley and Messersmith, 1985), and threatens to invade more areas
(Lacey et al., 1985). All parts of leafy spurge produce milky latex that
can cause dermatitis in humans and cattle (Lacey et al., 1985), and can
cause death in cattle if sufficient quantities are consumed (Kronberg et al.,
1993). Leafy spurge reduces forage production and wildlife habitat, and causes
considerable monetary losses to the livestock industry (Messersmith and Lym,
1983; Watson, 1985; Lacey et al., 1985; Nowierski and Harvey, 1988;
Bangsund, 1993; Leitch et al.,1994). Cattle carrying capacity in
rangeland can be reduced by 50 to 70% (Alley et al., 1984), and in some
cases, by 100 percent (Watson, 1985) through loss of grasses from competition,
and the tendency of cattle to avoid spurge-infested grass (Lacey et al.,
1985; Hein and Miller, 1992; Kronberg et al., 1993). Direct and secondary
economic losses from leafy spurge, due to lost cattle production, for the
Dakotas, Montana, and Wyoming in 1994 were estimated to approach $120 million
annually (Leitch et al., 1994). In addition, Wallace et al. (1992)
estimated nonagricultural losses (e.g., watershed and recreation impacts) from
leafy spurge at $10 million annually over the same four-state region. Leafy
spurge is much less abundant in the eastern United States, although it can be
weedy enough in pastures to require control.

Ecological damage. Although leafy spurge is most
commonly associated with more mesic sites, it is adapted to a broad range of
habitats, ranging from xeric to riparian sites (Nowierski and Zeng, 1994; Lym
1998; Kirby et al., 2000). The percent cover of grasses and forbs may be
significantly reduced at medium to high densities of leafy spurge (Nowierski and
Harvey, 1988). Studies by Belcher and Wilson (1989) have shown that native plant
species may be severely affected by leafy spurge. Such reductions in native
plant diversity also may have a negative impact on wildlife populations (Wallace
et al., 1992; Trammell and Butler, 1995). Population declines in a number of
native grassland bird species have been documented in the Great Plains Region of
North America at sites with moderate to high densities of leafy spurge (D.
Johnson, pers. comm.).

Geographic Distribution

Leafy spurge is native to Eurasia and is widely distributed from
Spain to Japan (Ohwi, 1965; Radcliff-Smith and Tutin, 1968; Pemberton, 1995).
Since the first recording of this weed in North America at Newbury,
Massachusetts in 1827 (Britton, 1921), it has become widespread in certain
regions of the United States and Canada. Leafy spurge has been recorded in 35
states within the United States, but has yet to be recorded in Oklahoma, Texas,
Arkansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama,
Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida (USDA, NRCS, 2001). The most extensive
infestations of the weed occur in the northern Rocky Mountain and Great Plains
states (Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and
Minnesota), and in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta,
Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario (USDA, APHIS, PPQ, CAPS, 1994). In the upper
Mississippi River drainage, leafy spurge occurs primarily in riparian habitats
(R. Hansen, pers. comm.). In the eastern United States, the plant is an
occasional weed of pastures, roadsides, and riparian habitats (R. Hansen, B.
Blossey, J. Wickler, and P. Wrege, pers. comm.). The weed can be locally
abundant, but usually is limited to discrete patches. Fifteen New York counties
were known to be infested with leafy spurge in the early 1980s (Batra 1983).

Background Information On The Pest Plant

Taxonomy

In North America, leafy spurge occurs as a complex of forms,
species, and hybrids and has been most commonly referred to as Euphorbia
esula L. (Euphorbiaceae) (Pemberton, 1985). The most problematic type
appears to be E. x pseudovirgata, which is a hybrid of E. esula sensu
stricto and E. waldsteinii (=E. virgata) (Dunn and
Radcliffe-Smith, 1980), hereafter referred to as leafy spurge, E. esula
L. (Harvey et al., 1988). Harvey et al. (1988) examined the leaf
morphology and triterpenoid composition of leafy spurge accessions from Montana
and five related European spurge species and concluded that all the Montana
leafy spurge and three of the five European species could not be distinguished
from Euphorbia esula.

Leafy spurge populations show a high degree of genetic,
chemical, and morphological variability, and as a consequence the taxonomic
identity of the United States populations and their affinities to other species
is unclear (Shulz-Schaeffer and Gerhardt, 1987; Watson, 1985; Harvey et al.,
1988; Torell et al., 1989; Nissen et al., 1992; Pemberton, 1995;
Rowe et al., 1997). This genetic variability, combined with other traits,
including the plant‘s possession of both sexual and asexual reproduction, a deep
underground root system, an ability to infest xeric, mesic, and even hydric
sites across a wide range of soil types (Nowierski and Zeng, 1994; Nowierski
et al., 1996; Nowierski et al., 2002), along with the existence of
many native spurge species (Euphorbiaceae) in North America (Pemberton, 1985),
makes both conventional management and classical biological control of this weed
complex and potentially difficult (Shulz-Schaeffer and Gerhardt, 1987).

Biology

Leafy spurge is an aggressive, deep-rooted perennial herb that
reproduces from seed and from numerous vegetative buds along its extensive
vertical and horizontal root system (Watson, 1985). Seeds of leafy spurge are
released explosively by dehiscence of the seed capsules, and may be projected up
to 4.6 m from the parent shoot (Hanson and Rudd, 1933; Bakke, 1936). Seeds are
dispersed by ants, birds, grazing animals, humans, and water (Hanson and Rudd,
1933; Bowes and Thomas, 1978; Messersmith et al., 1985; Pemberton, 1988;
Pemberton, 1995). Germination of leafy spurge seed can occur throughout the
growing season whenever adequate moisture is available, but the most favorable
conditions for germination occur in early spring (Bakke, 1936; Messersmith et
al., 1985). The roots of leafy spurge reportedly can reach a depth of 9 m
(Best et al., 1980).

Stems of leafy spurge are erect, tough and woody and range from
0.1 to 1.0 m in height (Lacey et al., 1985). The showy yellow-green
inflorescences produce an average of 140 seeds per stem. Leafy spurge leaves are
highly variable in shape, ranging from broadly linear-lanceolate to ovate
(Watson, 1985). Additional details on the morphology and anatomy of leafy spurge
can be found in Raju (1985).

Leafy spurge is one of the first plants to emerge in the spring,
and its appearance has been recorded as early as March in Iowa and Wisconsin and
early April in North Dakota (Messersmith et al., 1985). Vegetative
development and stem elongation occurs rapidly as the temperatures increase
during late April through early June. The swelling of the stem apex signals
initiation of the leafy spurge inflorescence, which occurs approximately one
week after stem emergence. The first yellow to yellowish-green bracts appear at
the base of the terminal inflorescence from early to late May depending on
environmental conditions (Messersmith et al., 1985). The showy yellow
bracts of the leafy spurge inflorescence are most visible from late May through
June. Flowering in the terminal inflorescence ends between late June and early
July. Seed development and maturation continue for approximately one month post
flowering. As the plants mature, the stems and leaves often turn from a
blue-green to a reddish brown, red, or yellow, either during hot, dry periods
after seed production in midsummer or due to senescence in the fall (Messersmith
et al., 1985). Plant phenology may vary greatly within and among locations
due to local microclimatic differences.

Analysis of Related Native Plants in the Eastern United
States

Risks to native plant species as a result of biological control
of leafy spurge were analyzed by Pemberton (1985). The analysis was limited to
the genus Euphorbia, in the tribe Euphorbieae, subfamily Eurphorbioideae,
family Euphorbiaceae (Mabberley, 1997). The genus is divided into five
subgenera, four of which are represented in the native flora of the eastern
United States. Of the approximately 107 native Euphorbia species in the
continental United States and Canada, about 45 occur east of the Mississippi
River. These include 23 species in the subgenus Chamaesyce, 13 species in
the subgenus Agaloma, and three species in the subgenus Poinsettia.
The remaining six species belong to the subgenus Esula, to which leafy
spurge belongs. Of these six, four are broadly sympatric with leafy spurge.
These are E. commutata Engelm., E. obtusa Pursh, E. purpurea
(Raf.) Fern., and E. spatulata Lam. Euphorbia purpurea is the only
perennial of these four, and it also is the only rare eastern species growing in
the general region where leafy spurge is more common. This perennial species is
under review for legally protected status by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(1993). The plant occurs in both dry and moist woods (Gleason and Cronquist,
1963) in Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Virginia, and West Virginia (Federal Register, 1993). There are four other rare
species of Euphorbia s.l. east of the Mississippi River, but all occur in
Florida (Federal Register, 1993). Euphorbia telephioides Chapm. is
formally listed as a threatened species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1997)
and is a member of the subgenus Esula that is restricted to the Florida
panhandle. The other three rare spurges belong to the subgenus Chamaesyce,
within the genus Euphorbia. Subgenera of Euphorbia appear to be
natural groupings and most Euphorbia-feeding insects that have been
evaluated as biological control agents distinguish among subgenera, accepting
plants within some subgenera as hosts while rejecting potential host plants
found in other subgenera (Pemberton, 1985).

History of Biological Control Efforts in the Eastern
United States

Area of Origin of Weed

The native range of leafy spurge is Eurasia and extends from
Spain to Japan (Ohwi, 1965; Radcliff-Smith and Tutin, 1968; Watson, 1985;
Pemberton, 1995). More precise geographic origins for populations invasive in
the United States have not been determined. In its native range leafy spurge is
typically just a scattered plant in the ecosystem. R. M. Nowierski has observed
the occasional use of leafy spurge in flower arrangements in Europe.

Areas Surveyed for Natural Enemies

European surveys for natural enemies of leafy spurge began in
the early 1960s by the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control (CIBC; name
subsequently changed to the International Institute of Biological Control
[IIBC]; now called CABI-Bioscience), through their European Station in Delémont,
Switzerland. In the 1970s, surveys were initiated by the USDA, ARS Biological
Control Laboratory in Rome, Italy (which is now the USDA, ARS European
Biological Control Laboratory in Montpellier, France). All of the natural
enemies released in North America to date against leafy spurge were discovered
during these extensive European surveys. Additional surveys for spurge natural
enemies, conducted in China from 1987 to the early 1990s, identified additional
promising agents, including several Aphthona species that are still under
study (Pemberton and Wang, 1989; Fornasari and Pemberton, 1993).

Natural Enemies Found

Manojlovic and Keresi (1997) reported that 121 insect species
(23 species of Homoptera, six Heteroptera spp., 37 Lepidoptera spp., four
Hymenoptera spp., 14 Diptera spp., and 37 Coleoptera spp.) are able to develop
on plants of E. esula, Euphorbia virgata Waldstein-Wartemberg and
Kitaibel, and E. cyparissias L. in Europe. Additional discussion of the
spurge fauna was provided by Gassmann and Schroeder (1995). Through surveys for
natural enemies of leafy spurge conducted by personnel of the IIBC laboratory in
Delémont, Switzerland, between 1961 and 1990, two rust species and 39 insect
species were found that were thought to be specialized on leafy spurges
(Gassmann, 1990). Of these, 22 insect species were screened as potential
biological control agents of leafy spurge. Additional insects have been screened
by personnel at the USDA, ARS Biological Control of Weeds Laboratory, Rome,
Italy; the USDA, ARS Biological Control Laboratories in Albany, California, USA;
the Montana State University Insect Quarantine Laboratory, Bozeman, Montana, USA
(Pemberton, 1995); and more recently the USDA, ARS Laboratory in Sidney,
Montana, USA.

Host Range Tests and Results

See “Host Range Tests and Results” for cypress spurge for
details regarding the host range tests for natural enemies attacking both leafy
spurge and cypress spurge.

Releases Made

Since 1965, 12 insect species have been released against leafy
spurge or cypress spurge in the United States, and 17 species have been released
in Canada. The first insect released in the United States against leafy spurge
was the spurge hawkmoth, Hyles euphorbiae L. (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)
(Figs. 3 and 4), which was first released in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, and
Washington during the mid-1960s (Julien 1987). The release material was
collected from an established population on cypress spurge in Braeside, Ontario,
from stocks originating from cypress spurge, Euphorbia cyparissias L, and
E. seguieriana Necker, from Switzerland, France, and Germany (Harris, 1984).
Hyles euphorbiae also was the first natural enemy of spurge to be released
in the eastern United States beginning in 1978 in New York, with releases
directed against both leafy and cypress spurge (Batra, 1983). Although the
insect was released against leafy spurge in numerous states (California,
Colorado, Idaho, Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, Nevada, New York, Oregon,
Wyoming) from 1964 to 1986, the insect only has become established in New York
(Batra, 1983), in Wyoming (Coombs, 2000), and at a number of sites in Montana
(R. M. Nowierski, unpub. data). Researchers have attributed the poor rates of
establishment of this insect to predation by ants, carabids, and mammalian
predators (Harris et al., 1985; R. M. Nowierski, S. J. Harvey, and J. M.
Story, unpub. data), and to the possible existence of different moth host races
(Harris, 1984).

The clearwing moth, Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis
(Denis and SchiffermÃ¼ller) (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae), was released against leafy
spurge in Idaho, Montana, and Oregon during 1975 to 1979. None of the releases
resulted in establishment (Pemberton, 1995). This and two other species, C.
hungarica (Tomala) (Fig. 5) and C. crassicornis Bartel (Fig. 6), were
released against leafy spurge in the western United States in 1975, 1993, and
1994, respectively. At present, it appears that none of these releases were
successful, except for one population of C. crassicornis, which has
established on leafy spurge in Oregon (Coombs, 2000).

The first coleopteran species
released against leafy spurge in the United States was the stem boring beetle,
Oberea erythrocephala (Schrank) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) (Fig. 7).
Releases of the beetle were made in Montana, Oregon, North Dakota, and Wyoming
during 1980 to 1986. Additional releases of O. erythrocephala were made
by APHIS, PPQ in Colorado, Iowa, Idaho, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,
Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island,
South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming during 1988 to 1995.
Oberea erythrocephala establishment has been documented in Montana (Rees
et

Flea beetles in the genus Aphthona have been the most
successful biocontrol agents released against leafy spurge in North America.
Aphthona abdominalis Duftschmidt (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Fig. 8),
Aphthona cyparissiae (Koch) (Fig. 9), Aphthona czwalinae (Weise)
(Fig. 10), Aphthona flava Guillebeau (Fig. 11), Aphthona lacertosa
Rosenhauer (Fig. 12), and Aphthona nigriscutis Foudras (Figs. 13 and 14),
were first released in the United States in 1993, 1986, 1987, 1985, 1993, and
1989, respectively, and all but A. abdominalis have established in the
United States (Pemberton, 1995; Hansen et al., 1997). In 1994 and 1995
USDA, APHIS, PPQ transferred Aphthona beetles from established
populations in the western United States to a number of eastern states (Hansen
et al., 1997). Releases of individual species or mixed collections of
several species (A. flava, A. cyparissiae, A. nigriscutis,
A. lacertosa and A. czwalinae) were made in Iowa, New Hampshire,
Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and Wisconsin.

The shoot tip gall midge, Spurgia esulae Gagné (Diptera:
Cecidomyiidae) (Figs. 15a,b), is the only fly species released against leafy
spurge in the United States. Releases were made in Montana, Oregon, North
Dakota, and Wyoming during 1985 to 1988, and establishment was later recorded in
Montana and North Dakota from these releases (Pemberton, 1995). Additional
releases were made by USDA, APHIS, PPQ in Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Michigan,
Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and
Wyoming from 1988 to 1996 (Hansen et al., 1997). As of 1997,
establishment of the midge from these releases has been documented in Colorado,
Montana, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wyoming (Hansen et
al., 1997). The midge also has been recorded as established on leafy spurge
in Idaho (Coombs 2000).

Informal human transport of leafy spurge biological control
agents from Canada to the United States and vice-versa has probably resulted in
additional releases (R. Hansen, pers. comm.). In addition, some biological
control agents of leafy spurge, such as the tortricid moth Lobesia
euphorbiana (Freyer), that have been released in Canada but not in the
United States, may move into the United States on their own.

Biology and Ecology of Key Natural Enemies

Hyles euphorbiae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)

The leafy spurge hawkmoth feeds on the leaves and flowers of
Euphorbia species in the subgenus Esula (Harris, 1984). Adult females
lay from 70 to 110 eggs singly or in clusters on the plant surface, and the
small black larvae emerge a week or two later depending on temperature. A
generation is completed in about six weeks (Pemberton, 1995). Larvae go through
a series of color changes as they grow, from black as they first eclose, to
greenish-yellow during the next couple of instars, to a showy combination of
black, white, red, and yellow during the last two instars. The larval integument
and hemolymph contains triterpenoids derived from feeding on leafy spurge (P.
Mahlberg and R. M. Nowierski, unpub. data). Larvae are believed to use these
compounds for chemical protection against predators, and field studies in
Montana have shown larval predation to be low (N. H. Poritz, R. M. Nowierski,
and S. J. Harvey, unpub. data). In contrast, rates of predation on pupae,
measured using different levels of exclusion, are high and are most likely due
to field mice (Peromyscus spp.) and shrews (R.M. Nowierski, S. J. Harvey,
N. H. Poritz, and J. M. Story, unpub. data). High pupal predation by animals may
explain the extreme differences in hawkmoth populations among years, as
populations of small mammalian predators typically are quite variable over time.

In Montana, hawkmoth larvae are generally present during the
last week or so of June and are most abundant the first week of July. Larvae
pupate in the soil in July and August and a significant proportion of pupae
eclose for a second generation.

Oberea erythrocephala (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

The longhorn beetle, O. erythrocephala, is native to
Eurasia where it feeds within the stems and roots of several Euphorbia
species. Adults appear in early to mid-summer when spurges are in flower, and
feed on the young leaves, flowers, and stem tissue for approximately two weeks
before beginning oviposition (Pemberton, 1995; Hansen et al., 1997).
Adult beetles girdle the upper part of the stem, chew a hole in it just above
the girdle, insert an egg and cover it with latex (Pemberton, 1995; Hansen et
al., 1997). Larvae take approximately one month to mine their way down the
stem into the crown and roots (Pemberton, 1995). Larvae feed within crowns or
roots until March or April and pupate within cells in the root crown in May.

Aphthona spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

The flea beetle genus Aphthona (Coleoptera:
Chrysomelidae) contains approximately 40 species that are known to feed on leafy
spurges (Euphorbia spp.) in Europe and Asia (Harris et al., 1985;
Fornasari and Pemberton, 1993; Fornasari, 1996). All of the established flea
beetle species released against leafy spurge in the United States are
univoltine, with some of the species showing phenological differences in adult
emergence during the course of the growing season (Hansen, 1994). Aphthona
abdominalis, which has not yet been documented as established in North
America, reportedly may produce more than one generation per year (Fornasari,
1996). Early larval instars feed in/on root hairs of the host plant, while later
instars feed in/on yearling roots. Larval feeding contributes to leafy spurge
mortality by disrupting water and nutrient transport and may provide entry
points for pathogenic soil inhabiting fungi (Hansen et al., 1997). Adult
flea beetles feed on leaves and flower bracts of leafy spurge. Aphthona
species overwinter as larvae, and generally pupate within the spurge roots in
late spring to early summer (Rees et al., 1996).

Aphthona cyparissiae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

The native range of A. cyparissiae extends from southern
Spain and France through central and eastern Europe to western Russia
(Pemberton, 1995). In Eurasia, this species occurs at higher altitudes and in
areas with cool, rainy summers (Pemberton, 1995). The species has a relatively
broad ecological amplitude and has been recorded from xeric to mesic sandy loam
sites in Eurasia (Müller, 1949; Maw, 1981; Fornasari, 1996; Gassmann et al.,
1996). However, this species has been less successful in establishing on leafy
spurge in the United States than A. nigriscutis and A. lacertosa.

Aphthona czwalinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

This blue-black flea beetle species is native to central and
eastern Europe (Germany, Austria, Poland), the lower Danube region, parts of
Russia, central Asia, and eastern Siberia (Gassmann, 1984). It is most commonly
found at mesic sites where Euphorbia is intermixed with other vegetation,
and is thought to have the potential to colonize sites such as stream margins,
where leafy spurge is often most abundant (Pemberton, 1995). The biology and
host range of A. czwalinae is similar to that of A. cyparissiae
and A. flava, although it is limited to fewer species in the subgenus
Esula than the other two species (Gassmann, 1984; Pemberton 1987). Because
the releases of A. czwalinae have typically been reported as an A.
czwalinae/A. lacertosa mix (Hansen et al., 1997), the actual
establishment and impact of this species on leafy spurge in various states in
the United States is unclear.

Aphthona flava (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

This flea beetle species is found from northern Italy east and
north through the former Yugoslavia, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania,
and Russia (Sommer and Maw, 1982). In Eurasia, this species occurs in xeric to
mesic habitats in areas with drier and warmer summers (Pemberton, 1995). Like
A. cyparissiae, this species has been less successful than A. nigriscutis
and A. lacertosa in establishing on leafy spurge in North America.

Aphthona lacertosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

This species is native to Eurasia where it is associated with
loamy or loamy-clay soils, in either dry or wet habitats (Gassmann, 1990;
Fornasari, 1996; Gassmann et al., 1996; Nowierski et al., 2002).
However, Maw (1981) reported that it preferred moist sites. Aphthona
lacertosa establishment and its impact on leafy spurge has been greatest at
moderately dry to mesic sites in the United States (Rees et al., 1996).
Unlike A. nigriscutis, which appears to be restricted to drier sites,
A. lacertosa has a broader ecological amplitude and may have greater
potential for controlling leafy spurge across a broad range of habitats.
Aphthona lacertosa can be distinguished from A. czwalinae by its
light-colored hind femur, whereas in A. czwalinae the hind femur is black
(A. Gassmann, pers. comm.).

Aphthona nigriscutis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

This Aphthona species is native to Europe and is adapted
to drier sites and sandier soils. This species has been most successful in
establishing and controlling leafy spurge in dry, open, sandy-loam sites in
Canada and the United States (Rees et al., 1996). It generally has done
poorly when released in high density leafy spurge infestations occurring in
heavier clay soils (R. M. Nowierski, Z. Zeng, and B. Fitzgerald, unpub. data).

Spurgia esula (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)

This small midge causes shoot-tip galls on leafy spurge, which
prevents flowering and thus seed production of the attacked shoot. Spurgia
esula is multivoltine and produces two or three generations per year in
Montana (Hansen et al., 1997) and up to five generations per year in its
native European range (Pecora et al., 1991). This gall midge overwinters
as a mature larva and the first adults appear in mid- to late spring. Adult
females deposit groups of eggs on leafy spurge leaves, typically near the apical
buds (Hansen et al., 1997). Upon eclosion, first instar larvae migrate to
leafy spurge buds and begin feeding within the meristematic tissues. Larval
feeding causes hypertrophy in the bud tissues and the formation of a bud gall,
within which the larvae feed. Larvae require two to four weeks to complete
development, depending on environmental conditions (Hansen et al., 1997).
Larvae of the non-diapausing summer generation construct silken cocoons inside
the bud galls, from which adult flies later emerge. Mature larvae of the
diapausing generation exit the galls, drop to the ground, and overwinter in the
soil. No major impacts on leafy spurge populations have been reported for this
biological control agent. However, Lym (1998) reported greater suppression of
leafy spurge when S. esulae was combined with herbicides than when either
approach was used alone.

Evaluation of Project Outcomes

Establishment and Spread of Agents

The spurge hawkmoth, H. euphorbiae, is established on
spurges in New York (Batra, 1983) and is locally common in the state (B.
Blossey, pers. comm.). Coordinated natural enemy releases by the USDA, APHIS,
PPQ during the mid 1990s have resulted in the establishment of many biocontrol
agents of leafy spurge east of the Mississippi River. Five Aphthona species (A.
cyparissiae, A. czwalina, A. flava, A. lacertosa, and
A. nigriscutis) have established in Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and
Wisconsin (Hansen et al., 1997). The gall midge, S. esulae, has
established in New York (Hansen et al., 1997), and in Michigan and
Wisconsin (R. Hansen, pers. comm.). Oberea erythrocephala has established
in Michigan (J. Winklar, pers. comm.) and in Minnesota (R. Hansen, pers. comm.).
At present, it is unclear whether any of these agents have established on leafy
spurge in New Hampshire. As of 1997, populations of S. esulae and the
Aphthona species in New York were not sufficiently large to provide insects
for redistribution (Hansen et al., 1997). But more recently, populations
of the Aphthona species have reached adequate levels for redistribution
in New York (P. Wrege, pers. comm.).

Suppression of Target Weed

The effects of imported natural enemies on leafy spurge
densities in the eastern United States have not been formally evaluated, but
there is some evidence that the Aphthona beetles are having an effect.
The beetles have provided control over large areas in Minnesota (R. Hansen,
pers. comm.), and are significantly reducing the weed at some sites in Michigan
(J. Winklar, pers. comm.) and New York (P. Wrege, pers. comm.). More information
is available about the impact of these biological control agents against leafy
spurge in the Northern Great Plains region.

Rees et al. (1996) reported that five Aphthona
species (A. cyparissiae, A. czwalinae, A. flava, A.
lacertosa, and A. nigriscutis) have established to varying degrees on
leafy spurge in the United States and Canada, and in a number of cases have
significantly reduced spurge density at the release sites (see Figs. 16 and 17).
Reductions in leafy spurge stem densities have been attributed to flea beetle
feeding by a number of authors (Hansen, 1993; Baker et al., 1996; Lym
et al., 1996; Stromme et al., 1996; and Kirby et al., 2000).
Stromme et al. (1996) reported that leafy spurge foliar cover decreased
from 40 to 1.7%, five years after A. nigriscutis was released near Edmonton,
Canada. At two sites in North Dakota, A. nigriscutis and A.
czwalinae/A. lacertosa reduced foliar cover of leafy spurge from 45 to 7%
over a three year period, and reduced stem densities by nearly forty-fold (Kirby
et al., 2000). In other areas, infestations of leafy spurge have been
successfully suppressed through a combination of flea beetle herbivory and
controlled grazing by sheep (J. Elliott, pers. comm.). Herbicides combined with
the leafy spurge flea beetles (A. nigriscutis or A. czwalinae/A.
lacertosa) or the gall midge (S. esulae) have controlled leafy spurge
better than either method used alone (Lym, 1998).

Neither the impact of introduced biocontrol agents on native,
non-target plants nor the recovery of native plant communities following the
decline in population levels of leafy spurge (following natural enemy impact)
have been reported in the literature. Some leaf feeding by adult A.
nigriscutis on Euphorbia robusta (Engelm.) Small has occurred at one
leafy spurge site in Wyoming, and larvae also were found on the roots of this
native euphorb (L. Baker, pers. comm.). However, the plant is increasing in
abundance at the site due to the beetle’s control of leafy spurge (L. Baker,
pers. comm.). Euphorbia robusta is very closely related to leafy spurge,
and prerelease laboratory studies indicated that the plant might become a host
of Aphthona spp.

Economic Benefits

The economic benefits from the biological control of leafy
spurge have not been formerly reported in the literature. However, given the
fact that A. nigriscutis and A. lacertosa have reduced leafy
spurge densities at numerous sites in the United States and Canada, this sort of
information should be forthcoming.

Recommendations for Future Work

As discussed previously, A. nigriscutis and A.
lacertosa have been the most successful biocontrol agents released against
leafy spurge in North America. However, neither of these agents have had a
consistent suppressive effect on leafy spurge growing in shaded areas and
riparian sites. Hence, additional natural enemy surveys are needed to find
specialized natural enemies of leafy spurge that are adapted to such habitats.
Pemberton (1995) recommended that only narrow specialists with potential host
ranges at or below the level of the subgenus Esula should be employed to
avoid damage to native North American Euphorbia species.

Leafy spurge is currently found in 35 states in the United
States (USDA, NRCS) and in all Canadian provinces except Newfoundland (Roslycky,
1972). The potential for further range expansion of this weed warrants the
continued redistribution of established biocontrol agents throughout North
America. In addition to recent biological control efforts in New Hampshire and
New York, biological control programs should be initiated in all other states in
the northeast and central United States that have significant infestations of
leafy spurge. Before releasing biological control agents in the eastern United
States, host specificity data should be obtained for each agent relative to the
rare Euphorbia purpurea and the endangered E. telephioides. The
abilities of these spurge natural enemies to live in the southern United States,
where additional rare Euphorbia occur, also should be considered.

Studies evaluating the effects of natural enemies introduced for
the biological control of leafy spurge should be initiated across a wide range
of habitat types and geographic areas in the United States. Studies should
include the assessment of economic and environmental benefits of biological
control, the effect of flea beetles on plant species richness and diversity
(including native species), and the assessment of any harmful effects on
threatened and endangered Euphorbia species. Lastly, integrated weed
management strategies need to be developed and implemented on a grander scale to
be able to achieve consistent and sustainable management of leafy spurge in
North America in the future.

Baker, J. L., N. A. P. Webber, K. K. Johnson, and R. L. Lavigne.
1996. The behavior of Aphthona nigriscutis and the response of
leafy spurge over a four year period in Fremont County Wyoming.Proceedings
of the Western Society of Weed Science 49: 47-48.

Gassmann, A. 1990. Aphthona lacertosa (Rosh) (Coleoptera:
Chrysomelidae): a candidate for the biological control of cypress
spurge and leafy spurge in North America, final report, January 1990.
C.A.B. International Institute of Biological Control, European Station,
Delémont, Switzerland.

Pemberton, R. W. 1985. Native plant considerations in the
biological control of leafy spurge, pp. 365- 390. In Delfosse,
E. S. (ed.). Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological
Control of Weeds. University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Government publishing Centre,
Ottawa, Canada.

Pemberton, R. W. 1987. Petition for the release of Aphthona
czwalinae Weise against leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) in
the United States. On file at the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Research Service Control Documentation Center, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.