Thanks for your comments, Eli. I am still wavering on whether to do the
permissive thing. And I am also looking at whether Typed Scheme and/or
"html-template" make the permissiveness less useful than before.
Permissiveness sure does make some things harder to implement and more
computationally expensive.
>> [...] However, I have come up with what I think are some improvements to SXML, such as [...] attribute value composition [...]
>>>> Is this aimed at the problem of combining `style' attributes? If so, can you say more on what you did for that?
>
I was speaking of named and numeric character entity references in
attribute values, which are supported in some versions of XML and HTML.
"Composition" was a poor choice of term on the Racket email list.
I'm not sure what you mean by "combining `style' attributes". Is that a
transform rather than a representation/linguistic issue?
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20101222/b801f4c6/attachment.html>