i have to take pitman, i just love how easily he dunks and nobody can do anything about it, sure his offence right now is just dunks mostly and that is bad but their are plenty of center that wish they could do what he does.

Pittman. He's a better rebounder and he imposes his will unlike any other college player. And he does it effortlessly. He's not the natural talent Gallon is, but I think he'll be the better player. Gallon reminds me of Jackie Butler more than Kevin Love at times.....

Body of Shaq? Shaq was 7'1 and about 310 at the same stage. Gallon is like 6'8 295, and he's not a center. He's not a defensive presence, and for as gifted as he is offensively, especially relative to Pittman, he's averaging less points than Pittman. Maybe he breaks out later in the season or next year to prove us wrong...

I agree Tiny is the more skilled player and more ahtletic but i still would rather take Pitman. Even though he mostly just dunks, you can't argue his production. The only thing holding him back is himself, he has to much of himself (that was a fat joke)

Your are all overlooking something, a few of you have said that pittman is getting better numbers...yes as a senior on a very good team. OU is struggling and does little to establish post play early/often compared to texas. Also, tiny gallon is a freshman...pittman is a senior.pittman has very little upside, gallon has a very high ceiling. think a more athletic zach randolph, who can dribble, presumably without the documented attitude problems...randolph is a career 19 and 10 guy...gallon could easily be better.