It is possible that you are as intellectually challenged as you sound.......or you have got the wrong end of the stick..........

On the probability of the latter let me urge you to read my original post.......

My comment was that the cartoon was dispicable and untrue...................and I went on to explain that the raison d'etre for daily star publishing it was to play-act the role of the victim as a cover for the rag's virulent anti-islamism and pro-indianism.