Walking Away and Not Without Reason

So I was on Facebook as a kill time and I took a Privilege test: it’s on BuzzFeed but no I am not going to link to it. I don’t want that click hole getting more advertising revenue.

I scored “Under Privileged”, and shared the results. Someone managed to question how I scored that, so I exclaimed some traits about me in regards to the questions. Then the other person specifically told me “You ain’t asexual.”

Now this really rather got under my skin: excuse me? You get to decide who I am and am not attracted to? Well that’s news to me. I didn’t receive that memo, I didn’t get a text, not an e-mail, not even a post it note.

You get to decide who I am and am not attracted to? So I put up a rather long post detailing why. When my hands stopped blazing across the keyboard I looked up and went “Ah crap.” It was very nearly article length.

So, time to post it for all to see.

I have never been sexually attracted to men. Trust me, my life would be way easier if I were. In this culture, asexuality is a greater social heresy than homosexuality. So if I were at all attracted to men, I’d be gay and give it no further thought. I just don’t find men attractive. If I look at pictures of “hot guys” all I think is “God I’m fat. I wonder what kind of work out routine he does?” Guys just don’t do anything for me.

Also, I have previously asked women not to talk to me by telling them I wasn’t their orientation. When I said I was gay, I didn’t get any issues. When I told the truth and said I was asexual: it became a scene. Again I say, if I were attracted to men, my life would be a hell of a lot easier. Alas, that’s not to be, oh well.

As for women, I’ve only ever personally met perhaps four women in my life who I did not personally witness being abusive to their male partners (or me for that matter). I say four, assuming I’m forgetting one… However, allow me to quantify.

This is MayoClinic, an extremely respected organization, and here’s what they post as warning signs of domestic abuse against men. I post this list, so that you readers can witness and easily verify it is exceptionally close to the list I will use to quantify the above statement.

•Calls you names, insults you or puts you down
•Prevents you from going to work or school
•Stops you from seeing family members or friends
•Tries to control how you spend money, where you go or what you wear
•Acts jealous or possessive or constantly accuses you of being unfaithful
•Gets angry when drinking alcohol or using drugs
•Threatens you with violence or a weapon
•Hits, kicks, shoves, slaps, chokes or otherwise hurts you, your children or your •pets
•Forces you to have sex or engage in sexual acts against your will
•Blames you for his or her violent behavior or tells you that you deserve it

Now this here is the list I will be using as I think it is more accurate. It comes from batteredmen.com, a resource center where male victims of domestic violence can seek help and resources.

• “Track” all of your time?
• Constantly accuse you of being unfaithful?
• Discourage your relationships with family and friends?
• Prevent you from working or attending school?
• Criticize you for little things?
• Anger easily when drinking or on drugs?
• Control all finances and force you to account in detail for what you spend?
• Humiliate you in front of others?
• Destroy personal property or sentimental items?
• Hit, punch, slap, kick, or bite you or the children?
• Use or threaten to use a weapon against you?
• Threaten to hurt you or the children?
• Force you to have sex against your will?

Pay attention, to the following:

• Criticize you for little things?
• Humiliate you in front of others?
• Use or threaten to use a weapon against you?
• Threaten to hurt you or the children?

I swear upon my life, aside from a small less than full handful of individual women: of every woman I have ever in person met, including friends, friends of friends, acquaintances, my mother, aunts, cousins, associates, co-workers. If I met them, even for the briefest period of time: I saw more than one of the above listed 4 behaviors, displayed to me.

Accounting for the perhaps as many as thousands of women I have personally met in my life; Perhaps but a handful, were all abusive to their male partners. They delighted in criticizing their male counterparts at any opportunity they got, denigrating and berating him IN FRONT of others in order to humiliate him.

I have also been witness to women’s sadistic joy in fantasizing, with absolute glee and cheer – literally fantasizing about and threatening to commit deplorable repugnant acts of violence against their male counterpart. What the Geneva convention would define as a crime against humanity: and place a person on trial for war crimes over.

This is supposed to be someone they care about: and yet they are reveling in their fantasies about committing atrocities against said person! Then – out of pure sadism – getting a thrill from watching the look of terror come over him.

I have witnessed this from nearly every female I have personally met: with the exception of less than five. And that’s assuming I forgot one, because I can only remember three!

I am not attracted to sadists. Do no not attempt to exclaim to me MY sexual orientation. I will not find it amusing, joke or not. I will not find it endearing, satire or not.

I have had plenty of sexual experience, sexual activity. I have never experienced orgasm during sex, as a result of nerve damage caused by my circumcision. I eventually stopped engaging in relationships when after dating for two decades. In that time I only ever managed to be in two relationships which weren’t abusive.

Then I began researching the issue of women being abusive and was vehemently repulsed. I thought it was just me, that I was unlucky. I had not yet realized that most women in this western culture are incredibly abusive towards men.

If you gather twenty random women off the street and ask them “True or false: the only thing men are good for is fucking and running over with a truck?” Most of them with laugh and emphatically agree. At best only two or three will disagree.

So at best you’re talking only 10% to 15% of women have any kind of compassion or decency towards men.

Now that I know more, understand more, and have come to realize abusive behavior when I see it. Having seen repulsively abusive behavior in and from nearly every single woman I’ve ever met in person: I’m no longer attracted to women.

I have absolutely no desire to be treated like disposable trash, thanks – but no thanks.

Anyone who’s not going to treat ME with the same level of courtesy, dignity and respect one should show to a complete stranger, and which I have always shown every woman I’ve ever dated; is quite specifically of NO interest to me, and I have NO use for them.

I’ve never hit a woman I was with, I’ve never forcibly restrained a woman I was with, never conducted sexual activity without consent, never cheated on a woman I was with. I’d do nice things, buy her something just because I thought it was nice. Breakfast in bed when she slept in on days off.

I once scored brownie points going on a guy’s night out pub crawl. I was at my 3rd bar, place called wide open. I’m 5 doubles into the evening (I’m Irish and Russian, it was only kahlua, 20% not enough to get drunk on), I call up my Girlfriend at the time got her voice mail “Hey babe, I’m having a great time. I’m five drinks in, surrounded by beautiful women and I’m thinking of you. Wish you were here, see ya later babe.” She sends me a text half an hour later, how she’s sitting there with her girlfriends swooning over the message I left her.

She had a stomach ache before, I sat on the floor while she laid on the couch and gently caressed her abdomen back and forth until she felt better. Her all natural shampoo used to mat her hair so I’d sit on the back of the couch and comb it out for her using my fingers so that her hair wouldn’t snag. I’m a genuinely good guy, and I’ve always treated women exceptionally well.

Of the women I’ve dated, which unfortunately is way too many, I’ve only been with two who didn’t treat me in a repugnant manner.

So no, not interested. It is women’s behavior which has put me off women.

“Anecdotal evidence!” The formless detractors cry. Ok fine.

You’re right, personal experience doesn’t quantify verifiable evidence. Simply because I’ve only ever personally met 3 women in my lifetime who were not abusive towards their male partners: doesn’t necessarily mean that the majority of women are… Ok, first off: statistically speaking we’re talking about a fairly large pool of the population in more than one geographic location. You’re realllly stretching the boundaries of what qualifies as “anecdotal” at this point. However, I will play along: I don’t count anecdotal evidence either.

Bought the book, read it cover to cover. It comes with a disclaimer, and at the end of the book is a chapter about how to turn your woman into a blow up doll. In 5 steps rather than 7. Similar behaviors, but NO mentioning of VIOLENCE. Here’s chapter 1 of the book. By the way, the chapter of turning a woman into a blow up sex doll via manipulation – was sickening.

Is this an examination of what not to do? Probably. So what’s the problem? Casual mentioning of violence with a complete blueprint of what you have to do in order to inflict stockholm syndrome on another human being: yes – that’s a problem. It also comes with a disclaimer so you can’t sue her – you know, just in case one, or a lot, of woman decide to use this advice.

Here’s a fuckin hint – you don’t need a legal disclaimer: for comedy or satire. You need it when you hand out blueprints for how to commit psychological and emotional abuse on people. Also, the attempt to balance out at the end by giving men a set of directions for how to become domineering in a relationship: was about control yes – but didn’t use a violent mode of reference.

It was “HOW TO TURN YOUR WOMAN INTO THE INFLATE-A-MATE OF YOUR DREAMS” – not something like “HOW TO BRAINWASH YOUR WOMAN INTO A RAPE HOLE” and then proceed to make a dozen rape/non-consensual sex references in the process. It begins with violence towards men, misandric diatribe and ends with with a NON-VIOLENT virgin daiquiri parody of the first part.

If you’re going to pretend one is equal to the other: make it equal. If you’re going to start with castration jokes – end with female circumcision jokes, or rape jokes, etc. Make it a “this is how you should not act or think” but don’t write this trash and pretend you’re not providing advice on how to abuse men. It’s also incredibly trite the very last chapter of the book, is where we find the NON-VIOLENT parody of the first chapter. Were a man to, for some unknown reason, pick up this book to read – it’s highly unlikely he would get through the first chapter.

Or stomach the two middle chapters, one of which details her getting freaked out by her kid returning home early and the other being about how biblical passages helped her figure out how to take a bath with no soap available.

Even taken as satire, with completely above board, honest to goodness, well meaning intentions: this provides a blueprint for how to inflict emotional and psychological abuse on another person, and even suggesting skipping all the psychological warfare and going for the bloodier version right away.

Even if I -were- to accept this as *only* being satire, IT STILL CANNOT BE DENIED that it is VIOLENT DIATRIBE which instructs a would be reader on exactly what steps, in what order should be taken in order to efficiently inflict stockholm syndrome through ISOLATION, MANIPULATION and ABUSE.

I would argue, that’s why it begins…. with a legal disclaimer absolving the author of any and all legal responsibility.

“This may sound demeaning and a bit harsh; so I don’t want you thinking I’m referring to all men as dogs. They are more like loveable puppies that need simple potty training. No matter how crass the methodology may be, the end results will likely perpetuate the making of the perfect relationship that will make all of your friends jealous.”

Any woman who follows any of this advice, never deserves to have the love or companionship of any man ever again.

This was NOT posted in their satire section: this was in their DATING section.

Do not click! I only post this to verify the articles location.
elitedaily.com/dating/train-man/

Meaning, this author, Gayana Sarkisova, posted this as actual dating advice for women.

She even left off with the following…

“Closing thoughts:
I’m going to tell you all a little secret. Nobody’s perfect, including you. So rather than jump the gun and discard a man for his lack of perfection, take the time out to train him into becoming the man you want him to be. Also, if he is perfect, that usually means the bitch he was with before you did all the work (and that’s not a good thing either).”

I’ll say it once more: “Any woman who follows any of this advice, never deserves to have the love or companionship of any man ever again.”

“So many of us come to the relationship game with a huge checklist, looking for Mr. Perfect. If he’s not rich enough—off with his head! But he can’t fulfill you if he doesn’t know how. He can’t make your dreams come true if he doesn’t know what they are. He can’t knock your socks off in bed unless you show him the way.

Every man is a work in progress, a diamond in the rough or a raw hunk of marble waiting to be chiseled. “Man training” is really the art of teaching a woman to receive from a man—and it is something every woman can learn. It’s a skill set—and the Womanly Arts Mastery Program is the only place on earth to learn it.”

Here is the 4th question, and answer…

4. The best way to make your guy happy is
1. Do whatever he wants.
2. Praise him for all the great things he does for you
3. Enjoy your life and get everything you want.

A may seem like the obvious answer, but actually, men live to serve women. He will lose interest in you if you don’t use him for your pleasure. B is a good start, but you can’t stop there. The most attractive thing a woman can do for a man is to give him a way to serve her. So think of things you want and tell him. If you chose C, you are probably already married or you have many boyfriends, and they are all crazy about you.

This is just a taste of what we cover—or un-cover—in the Womanly Arts Mastery Program. Are you ready to join us?

If you’d like even more, I’ve written an entire book on the subject: Mama Gena’s Owner’s and Operator’s Guide to Men.

I would begin posting one after another, but I just do not have the patience for such an activity. So I will provide you the google search instead. “how to train your man” currently has “About 286,000,000 results (0.46 seconds

“but but “how to train your woman gets 214,000,000 hits!” The formless detractors exclaim. Yeah, two of the top 4 are actually about a reddit post…. not serious publications. However, it looks like I’ll have to dig even deeper. Fine, you asked for it…

Women denigrating their men, intentionally. Why? Well, because they can. They don’t care that they’re being abusive, emotionally and psychologically – they care not at all. Not in the slightest. Women most often treat men with complete and absolutely abject disregard.

“Powerful women rarely deviate from the orthodoxies of feminist groupthink in their public utterances; but Anne-Marie Slaughter has a mind of her own and speaks it fearlessly.

The former director of policy planning at the US State Department, author of “Why Women Still Can’t Have it All” and now President and CEO of the New America Foundation, often communicates with an educated originality far above the gutter of Loose Women.

So it was exhilarating for me last week to come across some remarks of hers from 2013 in which she talked about the division of labour and powers between men and women in the home. She said: “Women are hypocrites this way, because we would go crazy if men treated us in the workforce the way we typically treat them at home – if a guy in the workforce assumed he was more competent than you are, and told you what to do – but that’s the way most women treat men in the household.”

Women often don’t care if their partner is happy or not: so long as they themselves are. They care not at all. Not in the slightest. Women most often treat men with complete and absolutely abject disregard.

“When it comes to a happy marriage, a new Rutgers study finds that the more content the wife is with the long-term union, the happier the husband is with his life no matter how he feels about their nuptials.

“I think it comes down to the fact that when a wife is satisfied with the marriage she tends to do a lot more for her husband, which has a positive effect on his life,” said Deborah Carr, a professor in the Department of Sociology, School of Arts and Science. ”Men tend to be less vocal about their relationships and their level of marital unhappiness might not be translated to their wives.”

Carr and Vicki Freedman, a research professor at the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, co-authored a research study published in the October issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family on marital quality and happiness among older adults.

The study, done by the two Big Ten universities, differs from previous research, according to Carr, because it examines the personal feelings of both spouses to determine how these marital appraisals influence the psychological well-being of older adults. Researchers analyzed data of 394 couples who were part of a national study of income, health and disability in 2009. At least one of the spouses was 60 or older and, on average, couples were married for 39 years.”

Women inflict emotional, psychological and physical abuse on their partners in order to control them. Not out of devotion or love: but because they covet – they want to control this person so that no one else may have them. You don’t do this to someone you love, cherish and respect. You do it to someone you have absolutely no respect for as an individual human being. Remind you of the above “How to Train your man” items? Women most often treat men with complete and absolutely abject disregard.

“In a survey of 2,500 students at UF and the University of South Carolina between August and December 2005, more than a quarter (29 percent) reported physically assaulting their dates and 22 percent reported being the victims of attacks during the past year. Thirty-two percent of women reported being the perpetrators of this violence, compared with 24 percent of men. The students took selected liberal arts and sciences courses. Forty percent were men and 60 percent were women, reflecting the gender composition of these classes.

In a separate survey of 1,490 UF students, one quarter (25 percent) said they had been stalked during the past year and 7 percent reported engaging in stalking, of whom a majority (58 percent) were female.

Although women were the predominant abusers, they still made up the largest number of victims in both surveys, accounting for 70 percent of those being stalked, for example.

The reason more college men weren’t victims may be that women in the study did not exclusively date them, preferring men who had already graduated, not yet enrolled in college or chose not to attend college at all, Gover said. “It shows that students who are perpetrating these attacks aren’t just targeting other students on campus,” she said.”

Women inflict significantly more physical abuse/domestic violence than men. Yet we have the Violence Against Women act. They don’t care that they’re being abusive, emotionally and psychologically – they care not at all. Not in the slightest. Women most often treat men with complete and absolutely abject disregard.

“SUMMARY: According to a 2010 national survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Department of Justice, in the last 12 months more men than women were victims of intimate partner physical violence and over 40% of severe physical violence was directed at men. Men were also more often the victim of psychological aggression and control over sexual or reproductive health. Despite this, few services are available to male victims of intimate partner violence.”

“In the last 12 months 5.4 million men were victims of intimate partner violence, 2.3 million victims of serious physical violence, yet there are virtually no programs to serve them.

Intimate partner violence by women increases the chances that they will themselves be victims of intimate partner violence.

Intimate partner violence is morally wrong and criminal, but there are few programs for women batterers to show them better ways to resolve conflicts in a relationship.”

Lets not forget Harvard medical determining that women perpetrate over 70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence. Harvard’s study was independent of the CDC and came to nearly identical numbers.

“Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.9, 2.8), but not men (AOR=1.26; 95% CI=0.9, 1.7). Regarding injury, men were more likely to inflict injury than were women (AOR=1.3; 95% CI=1.1, 1.5), and reciprocal intimate partner violence was associated with greater injury than was nonreciprocal intimate partner violence regardless of the gender of the perpetrator (AOR=4.4; 95% CI=3.6, 5.5).”

IPV researcher Deborah Capaldi, Ph.D., a social scientist at the Oregon Social Learning Center. Dr Capaldi discovered that unless women initiated violence against their male partners: their male partners were literally unlikely to BE violent with them – even if they were previously violent in other relationships.

“Dr. Capaldi notes that in a study of women who were in a battered women’s shelter, “67% of the women reported severe violence toward their partner in the past year.” Others in the domestic violence field, including Erin Pizzey, founder of the first battered women’s shelter in England in the early 1970s, have had similar findings.””The OYS’ Couples Study followed the men in the study and their romantic partners from age 18 to 31-33, interacting with each other at seven different points in time during the 13-15 year period. The OYS studied physical aggression and psychological aggression among the men and women, using reports from men and women about their own violence, their reports of their partners’ violence, and observed aggression. “

“The study found that a young woman’s IPV was just as predictive of her male partner’s future IPV as the man’s own past IPV. In other words, whereas we often think of men as the only abusers and also as serial abusers, the OYS found that a woman’s violence against her man was as predictive of his violence to her as his own history of violence.

Moreover, the study found that men’s physical aggression changes significantly when they find a new partner. Instead of a man being either a batterer or not, often it was his female partner’s violence or nonviolence which heavily influenced whether he would be violent to her.”

Women intentionally inflict emotional and psychological abuse on men just to get a reaction so they can gauge their man’s level of emotional involvement, because that reassures them that he’s committed to the relationship. They don’t care that they’re being abusive, emotionally and psychologically – they care not at all. Not in the slightest. Women most often treat men with complete and absolutely abject disregard.

“Women are renowned for being the ones to urge their other halves to talk about their troubles – while men are just as famous for feeling hen-pecked because of it.

Now a study has helped shed light on why couples can find it so hard to understand each other. It may all come down to the different ways we try to empathize with the opposite sex.

Women, it claims, feel reassured when they see their man unhappy. They believe that if the man allows them to see that he is upset – rather than withdraw – it shows he is committed to the relationship.”

“Women inflict emotional, psychological and physical abuse on their partners in order to control them. Not out of devotion or love: but because they covet – they want to control this person so that no one else may have them. You don’t do this to someone you love, cherish and respect. You do it to someone you have absolutely no respect for as an individual human being. Women most often treat men with complete and absolutely abject disregard.”

Yes – good eye: you noticed that’s a quote from further up. Gold star: no, same exact message – completely different study…. You know what happens when two different studies on a subject find the same results? It’s referred to as “replicable results”, and it’s proof that the previous results were not a fluke.

“The research found that women showed controlling behaviour along with serious levels of threats, intimidation and physical violence when in a relationship more often than men.

More than 1,000 young men and women were questioned about any “Intimate Partner Violence” (IPV) they had inflicted on a girlfriend or boyfriend, or been subjected to themselves. The results are in contrast to earlier studies which suggested women are almost always the victims of such behaviour.

Dr Elizabeth Bates, who led the study at the University of Cumbria, said: “Previous studies have sought to explain male violence towards women as arising from patriarchal values, which motivate men to seek to control women’s behaviour, using violence if necessary.”

“This study found that women demonstrated a desire to control their partners and were more likely to use physical aggression than men.

“It wasn’t just pushing and shoving,” said Dr Bates, who presented the results at a meeting of the British Psychological Society in Glasgow. “Some people were circling the boxes for things like beating up, kicking, and threatening to use a weapon.”

“OK, so those studies all say that women are significantly more abusive than men. That doesn’t mean most women are abusive towards men!” The formless detractors implore!….. Ok, fine. You want to see something that’s entirely one sided?

Marriage today, in America, is identical to the legal definition of extortion. It is “The obtaining of property from another induced”—”under color of official right.” The legal system has been manipulated to make marriage the legal definition of extortion. No ands, ifs, or buts about it. It is, by strict legal definition, extortion.

Furthermore, Alimony is a multi-BILLION (with a B, BILLION) dollar EXTORTION SCAM which is almost exclusively reserved for women.

According to this report by the treasury department, in the year 2010 alone there were $10 BILLION dollars in alimony tax write offs filed. $2.3 billion of this is untraceable, meaning a lot of people were cheating on their taxes by claiming more than what was paid, or claiming they paid that which they did not, and an unknown number of recipients who claimed they didn’t receive something which they -did-.Even, however, if you exclude the $2.3 billion unaccounted for, that still leaves $7.7 BILLION dollars if Alimony payments being claimed on taxes, all with unique individual and verified Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TIN).

According to the last US Census, 97% of alimony recipients are women. So once again I say: Alimony is a multi-BILLION-dollar EXTORTION SCAM which is almost exclusively reserved for women.

“Extortion: The obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.”

You PAY your alimony, or people with guns (law enforcement) will show up at your door, or place of employment, put you in handcuffs and throw you in jail – where anyone without noticeable gang affiliations has a high probability of getting raped.

The obtaining of property from another – Checkinduced by wrongful use of:
–actual or threatened force – Check–violence – Check–Fear – Checkunder color of official right – Check

Alimony is an extortion scam: it is indefensibly identical to the definition of extortion. What’s more: even if the woman is successful and extraordinarily wealthy: if you have more than she has – she will still be permitted to legally commit EXTORTION within a court of law.

“but but, that’s just divorce! Most women care about men!” The formless detractors decry! Oh, really? I have an article about that…

“18% of women self identify as feminists: LESS than 18% of women do or even publicly SAY anything against the other 18% Feminist minority, which leaves the 64% non-feminist/non-men’s rights activist majority either supporting every unjust persecution or completely indifferent to it.

“Womankind” isn’t doing anything for “mankind”, so why exactly SHOULDN’T Men turn their backs on womankind? 82% of you don’t fuckin care what happens to us, you’re not helping us, you’re not looking out for our well being, you’re not even looking out for the well being of your own male children by speaking against the sexist laws feminists are constantly trying to have passed or have already passed.

Men aren’t so easily replaced when there’s fewer of them lined up huh? So now you’re trying to say “wait, no, don’t go, don’t abandon us – we’re not like the others.” Well, 82% of you have stood by, remained quiet, did nothing and said nothing while the Feminists were busy instituting gendered laws which allow any scandalous woman to ruin a man’s life at will based upon nothing but her whimsy.

If the vast over-whelming majority of YOU are going to stand by and do nothing while we’re being slandered, demonized, dehumanized, discriminated against and denied civil liberties: than the vast overwhelming majority of you deserve us to turn our backs on you. So remind me…. who’s abandoned whom in this ordeal?”‘

“but… but…. You’re just a MISOGYNIST!” The formless detractors decree!

Not so, I also have an entire article about that very possibility. “O, My Soggy Knees!” You see, PsychologyToday ran an article “12 ways to spot a misogynist man.”

So I decided to respond to it by examining my own behavior and determine whether or not that could in fact be true of myself. I scrutinized my own behavior very closely, and admitted very intimate details about myself. However after examining my own behavior very closely, as it would turn out: I’m not a misogynist.

As I started earlier: “It is women’s own behavior which has put me off women.”

The inescapable fact: is that most women in western society are abusive to their male partners. Be that their boy friends or husbands. Not all, just most. I quantify my statements, and provide the proof of this assertion.

If I decide to stop dating women: I’m no one of consequence. It doesn’t matter what I do. The problem is, 70% of Millennial men are now unmarried and for the first time in this country’s 239 years of existence: unmarried adults have become the majority at over 51% of the population.

Which means, the real problem – is that the systemic abuse which I lay out for you in detail in this article: is also being noticed by other men. The problem you should worry about is not me, but all the other men who decide they don’t want to be abused by someone who supposedly cares about them.

Japan is currently staring down the barrel of calamity. So many men decided to extricate themselves from relationships with women: that they now have such a desperately small birth rate, that they will not have enough population to sustain their own infrastructure in less than 40 years.

MGTOW is a movement all it’s own. It’s men walking away from the traditional lifestyle which treats them like slaves, and walking away from the majority of women who would treat them absolute disregard.

Again I say:

“If I decide to stop dating women: I’m no one of consequence. It doesn’t matter what I do.”

< “the real problem – is that the systemic abuse which I lay out for you in detail in this article: is also being noticed by other men.”

< “The problem you should worry about is not me, but all the other men who decide they don’t want to be abused by someone who supposedly cares about them.”

Share this:

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

Published by

Observing Libertarian

I am a Humanist small L libertarian Deontological Minarchist. In that order - As a result of this philosophy: I cannot in good conscience condone the actions of any group, movement or organization which seeks to oppress another individuals human rights. By education I have an Associates of Occupational Studies in Gunsmithing, and am qualified to testify in Open Court on the State's behalf as a Firearms expert. I am also an NRA Certified Firearm Instructor. I am currently in the Process of writing two books on Philosophy
View all posts by Observing Libertarian

that’s an accurate list of abuse that feminist echo chambers will justify inflicting on innocent men. To them it is “justifiable retribution” for womyn’s historical oppression. Yes… providing for womyn protecting them, exonerating the dames of duties and responsibilities… all patriarch privileges! #YeahRight ;o)

Feminism and social justice often falls back to a fascinating conceptual piece of doublethink where they insist that proletariat / protected class X, Y or Z should be endowed with special rights and special protections when defending double standard laws in use or proposing new ones. It is doublethink by definition in that it is two contrary things held in one’s mind at one time being accepted as true in spite of being mutually exclusive or even antithetical.

Now, although doublethink is a fairly commonly known or at least identifiable phenomena, there was no singular definition for the key aspect witnessed in Feminists and SJWs. “Feminism is about equality, which is why we support establishing double standard Q”. Forcing the onlooker to point and say “but that’s a double standard, not equality.” To which the out spoken onlooker will be subjected to a load of horse manure rationalizations to explain how supporting a double standard is equal.

It’s a non-stop, continual phenomena seen in and from Feminists, social justice warriors and what laws they support, defend or propose. With no ready made singular descriptor for this exact behavior I was forced to create one. Thus, the birth of the “Ad Minus Aequius” logical fallacy. Described here bellow.

All women are fasscist by nature , their insecurities dictate this. Proven in a study on girls playing with dolls, they are not playing they are controlling . punishing degrading and obsessing over each doll being in its proper place. Then they move on to boys.