Posts by CLYDE

The Mossad 'leaks' smell political. Think CIA, if you will not believe that.

Usually when an intelligence agency starts leaking information for political reasons, its to support whatever their boss has been saying. In this case, it was to counter what their boss has been saying. What can politically be achieved by Mossad if they call out their boss his nonsense.

I'd like to see Elizabeth Warren run for president, but she doesn't have the Armour that Hillary has.
If the USA is to have a president, that is also female, then Hillary it will be.
Imagine Women voting for a Womam, ...where will it end?

That is a sad litany and probably mostly true.
I don't believe he deserted there is no evidence that he never intended to return, that was the definition of desertion when I was subject to the UCMJ back in the early 60s, I think he went AWOL.

When I was in the service 72-80 the line between desertion and awol was in being awol you had left your clothes in your locker at the barracks. You had every intention of coming back. I have no clue what being on the front lines were.

Not much difference.

AWOL also depended on the reason (Sex? Drink? Both?), your Service Record, and WHERE!!!

Saudi and allied air strikes in Yemen. Intense last-minute talks with Iran in Lausanne. And Netanyahu goes ballistic in his rhetoric.
If there is no deal with Iran in Lausanne, Iran can do more or less what it wants in terms of enrichment and nuclear technology.
The thesis that one can sort things out in the Middle East with some bombing has a - mildly speaking - somewhat debatable track record.

The Enemy of my Enemy, is my Friend.

Iran is The Enemy of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Isreal, Egypt, etc.

Interesting, and possible (Temporary) Alliance.

Iran is not the enemy of Iraq, not anymore. Iran is also the enemy of IS which is a common threat faced by Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Israel.

Furthermore, Iran is still years away from getting a nuclear weapon, at least according to Mossad intelligence (I told you Netanyahu is a liar). Of course, trust the Israeli's to do something stupid if they don't get what they want.

ALL the country's surrounding Persia, Are their enemy.

If you read ALL articles regarding Intelligence Assessments (Involved decades ago), you will understand disagreements, between Intelligence Agency's, and within the SAME Agency's, regarding Assessments.

Almost all 'Information' is Partial, and Incomplete. There are many disagreements.

The Mossad 'leaks' smell political. Think CIA, if you will not believe that.

...Mrs. Clinton is a lawyer and officer of the court. If she truly was unaware of the nature of using personal equipment or accounts for government business, then you are telling me she is unfit to be a lawyer as I can't believe that she has so shirked her requirement for continuing education as to be ignorant.

The general public may not understand this.

The General Public does understand erasing 18 minutes of tape, and erasing hard drives, on Equipment used for Government purposes.

That is Hillary's problem.

BTW: I would rather have her as President, rather than the present occupant, and a couple of Right Wing Republican prospects.

Saudi and allied air strikes in Yemen. Intense last-minute talks with Iran in Lausanne. And Netanyahu goes ballistic in his rhetoric.
If there is no deal with Iran in Lausanne, Iran can do more or less what it wants in terms of enrichment and nuclear technology.
The thesis that one can sort things out in the Middle East with some bombing has a - mildly speaking - somewhat debatable track record.

This will also apply, and your Post Deleted - If you insult me, or accuse me, when you misunderstand me? Correct?

Clyde. I don't make ad hominem attacks against you. You often misread or misunderstand my posts and rather than asking for clarification you fly off the handle and start calling me names.

In future, if you are offended by something I write, ask for clarification. Re-read it. Think about the different ways a post can be read or understood and ask yourself if you really do have the actual meaning behind it. Sometimes I might get the punctuation wrong or most often I assume that there is a certain common ground that I don't need to state and make a brief statement based on that understanding.

I have to say, pretty much every time you freaked out about something I've written is is because you haven't actually understood what I am trying to say.