Renewable EnergyDiscussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

after having seen the circuit closer look, I realized it is not the circuit I built..
your circuit is wrong.. I see no path for that cap to take the inductive discharge. rather than c-e of the transistor..
perhaps it will work if you reverse the diode at the top..

anyway Its out of topic and you probably would just state otherwise.. taking this into a senseless closed minded discussion.

What continues to be incomprehensible to me is why you persist in forcing me to correct everything you say out here. I suppose the spice software is closed minded too? Are you serious or just trolling me?

No its not the circuit you built, I told you several posts ago it is what you must do to correct the circuit you built because your circuit has errors. Your discharged output cap is in series with the 'source' which cannot be if you want to charge the output cap off the pulses from the coil.

I used a manual switch in place of the transistor to make it easy because frankly you are wasting everyone time out here, but this hopefully will put this to rest. You can see the cap on the right charges just fine and dandy in the negative direction with the diode as drawn.

Your continued mistake is to charge c2 direct off of c1 which is what will happen if you reverse the diode.

Here is your circuit:

The transistor is a switch:

Below is the same thing as your circuit replacing the transistor with a switch, the reed and magnet is irrelevant and useless, all you need to do is turn your transistor on and leave it on to charge the cap, no pulses from the coil whatsoever just like in the spice I made to help you understand the problem.

As you can see you are just dumping the voltage from one cap to the other. The voltage on the discharged cap goes immediately to max, all you had to do was turn on your transistor and leave it on, like a switch as I have shown above. Its directly charging one cap from another and all your coil is doing is adding a small delay to the charge time without any switching required.

You dont need the coil at all, its just acting like a hunk of wire between the cap and switch or transistor. I suppose to be fair, in some respects learning what doesnt work is as important as learning what does

after having seen the circuit closer look, I realized it is not the circuit I built..
your circuit is wrong.. I see no path for that cap to take the inductive discharge. rather than c-e of the transistor..
perhaps it will work if you reverse the diode at the top..

anyway Its out of topic and you probably would just state otherwise.. taking this into a senseless closed minded discussion.

Ricards,
I recognized that closed minded non-buildering disruptor from the beginning. Only answer is the "ignore list" setting. Ahhh so peaceful and quiet.

Ricards,
I recognized that closed minded non-buildering disruptor from the beginning. Only answer is the "ignore list" setting. Ahhh so peaceful and quiet.

wantomake

As much as you would like to pretend its my problem is yours. Hate to tell ya but you are living in the stone age.

In fact I did 'build' the circuit in SPICE as you can see in the gifs I provided, you would be wise not to pretend otherwise.

I built the circuit in a matter of maybe 5 minutes each, the time consuming part is preparing them to put up here to teach you guys whats going on.

Quote:

What Can You Do With SPICE?

More specifically, it is a general-purpose circuit simulation program that provides linear AC analysis, non-linear transient analysis, and nonlinear DC analysis.

Analysis is performed by solving combinations of theoretical and experimental (device model) equations representing the behavior of elements based on Kirkhoff's current and voltage laws, utilizing modified nodal point analysis.

Device Model

A device model is an analytical expression that was developed based on theoretical and experimental study.

Spice modeling is how we design circuits today instead of wasting time and resources by winding coils only to scrap them and find it all in the scrap yard when you guys give up because your hand wound coils do not work the way you dreamed.

So unless you can show us some mysterious mojo schtick going on that no one in the history of electricity every thought of the SPICE analysis will give you the 'correct' answers for your design no wire required, things like stiffler is doing excepted since the program has no algorithm for spacial inductance that I am aware of. Newman, smith and stevens tpu have nothing to do with spacial inductance.

The newman sparkler is a fraud, just like the tpu and that suit case guy dennis or don smith or whatever his name is. They prey on people who can not see through their scam.

I even went so far in trying to help you as to give you the stiffler resonator youtube clip which has been proven to work by several replications, but its a lot more complicated and requires an excellent understanding of induction principles and what it takes to set the whole system into oscillation.

So you see there are things that actually do work out here but it seems some people are prone to waste their time thinking they will be the one to make the impossible possible! It hasnt happened yet and it wont be happening anytime soon.

You can thank ricards for taking it off topic with his so called 'simple circuit'.

Personally I'd like to see people work on projects that are possible and can lead to success instead of failure. Whats important is to understand what is really going on with these devices not what one 'hopes' is going on. The frauds and their worshiping apologists are the disruptors not me.

Another person to check out is the oldscientist on youtube, he does a good job on most of his experiments and has equipment to back it up and if you are into Tesla coils Meyl does the best job I have seen out here.

As much as you would like to pretend its my problem is yours. Hate to tell ya but you are living in the stone age.

In fact I did 'build' the circuit in SPICE as you can see in the gifs I provided, you would be wise not to pretend otherwise.

I built the circuit in a matter of maybe 5 minutes each, the time consuming part is preparing them to put up here to teach you guys whats going on.

Spice modeling is how we design circuits today instead of wasting time and resources by winding coils only to scrap them and find it all in the scrap yard when you guys give up because your hand wound coils do not work the way you dreamed.

So unless you can show us some mysterious mojo schtick going on that no one in the history of electricity every thought of the SPICE analysis will give you the 'correct' answers for your design no wire required, things like stiffler is doing excepted since the program has no algorithm for spacial inductance that I am aware of. Newman, smith and stevens tpu have nothing to do with spacial inductance.

The newman sparkler is a fraud, just like the tpu and that suit case guy dennis or don smith or whatever his name is. They prey on people who can not see through their scam.

I even went so far in trying to help you as to give you the stiffler resonator youtube clip which has been proven to work by several replications, but its a lot more complicated and requires an excellent understanding of induction principles and what it takes to set the whole system into oscillation.

So you see there are things that actually do work out here but it seems some people are prone to waste their time thinking they will be the one to make the impossible possible! It hasnt happened yet and it wont be happening anytime soon.

You can thank ricards for taking it off topic with his so called 'simple circuit'.

Personally I'd like to see people work on projects that are possible and can lead to success instead of failure. Whats important is to understand what is really going on with these devices not what one 'hopes' is going on. The frauds and their worshiping apologists are the disruptors not me.

Another person to check out is the oldscientist on youtube, he does a good job on most of his experiments and has equipment to back it up and if you are into Tesla coils Meyl does the best job I have seen out here.

All talk.. no work.. off topic.
Its no fun if it's just the computer and your mind..
Nothing wrong with SPICE..
But something's wrong with you.

Ricards,
I recognized that closed minded non-buildering disruptor from the beginning. Only answer is the "ignore list" setting. Ahhh so peaceful and quiet.

wantomake[/QUOTE]

Hello Wantomake,

I also placed the disruptor on my IGNORE LIST !

Also frees up more thread space for me.

You have already seen the MONSTER COIL Pic's I sent you

But now I am including them here for other members to view.

All the NECESSARY restraints and hold down Zip Ties can be seen also.

As I said to you I am now working on the commutator system to alternate the DC voltage through the Coil to keep The Magnet Rotor Spinning.

Other Items needed will follow after.

Hope, as you do , you are soon well and back on your 3BG Build.

Respectfully,

Clarence[/QUOTE]

Clarence my ole' friend,

Smart move on the "ignore list".

I just will not waste time or space on such posters. The commutator is a good idea. Will you be "shorting" this coil or the top one? That's if you plan to build a top coil.

Before this bug hit me, I was shorting the coil on the upright Turion generator. Just to see the fireworks display. Each pulse almost melted the HD reed switch. That's only 3 lbs. of magnet wire compared to your 10 lbs. I read some builders were shorting their coils more than once per passing of the magnet. Looks like J. Newman did also.

Some of that stuff was found to be bot's Aaron chimed in about
how he cleaned out a bunch from last year. Maybe I should put
bots on my list, good idea.

In the mean time good to see yer still kickin over there and your
coil is Mega. Can't wait to see the huge double whammy magnet
blocks to go with that.

Somebody got to make this thing work and do away with the last
50 years of speculation. Waintin on ya.

Brodude,
Yes over on Small Experiments thread Admin warned him about the disrespect toward another member.

We All are here to build, learn, support these different builds. Sure there will be those that disagree. But don't be disruptive and negative. Show your work with explanation and in the "spirit" of FE exploration.

Can't wait to see what my ole' sippin friend turns out on his impressive build. We will know with experience and true testing IF indeed J. Newman was a con or genius. Judging from how big brother teamed up against him from the video, I'm thinking the latter.

Brodude,
Yes over on Small Experiments thread Admin warned him about the disrespect toward another member.

We All are here to build, learn, support these different builds. Sure there will be those that disagree. But don't be disruptive and negative. Show your work with explanation and in the "spirit" of FE exploration.

Can't wait to see what my ole' sippin friend turns out on his impressive build. We will know with experience and true testing IF indeed J. Newman was a con or genius. Judging from how big brother teamed up against him from the video, I'm thinking the latter.

Just my opinion.
As always time to nuke the coffee,
wantomake

Hello wantomake,

Since last word from me,
I found out that I DO need a DUAL Commutator system to ALTERNATE the DC
voltage through the coil.
The DUAL commutator will allow enough Fire time to off time through the coil
To get the job done.
Only problem is that another commutator and brush holder will have to be purchased .
At present my funds to do so are just not there. More will not be available until June 20 th.
Means a real long wait. So nothing will be coming from me during that time.

Clarence ole friend,
I understand about the funds. The SS doesn't go so far these days.

The second commutator will do the job timing the on,off, and shorting to the capacitor. From the picture you posted I built a short and smaller version. It was 2" pvc pipe with caps on ends that held it in place on threaded rod. Used 1/2" copper strips from old started coils. But as the picture shows more contact area keeps the sparking down to avoid heat and scarring of the contacts.

Look forward to your progress. We got big time monsoon season here so just trying to stay dry.

Thanks Vidbid,
This is best guide to build from. I only built the smaller version so it wasn't much help to me. But I did get some understanding from it. Would been great to see the EV car size J. Newman built. Or how he built it to size.

Clarence is building a good looking table top version. Happy building ole friend.

According to Byron Brubaker, Jo had helium filled inside of those rotating permanent magnets. Apparently, if a glass globe were to be filled with helium and wrapped with a copper winding, then interesting EMs occurs in that winding. This I can't account for in my simulations except that I hint at a second source of energy sourced from these rotations blending with the DC coming from the battery pack.

Sorry, I'm not on track with this topic but my intuition tells me that Newman machine is just a bigger version of Richard Willis first prototype (or rather Richard Willis incidentally constructed his first prototype in fashion similar to Newman machine). Try to find photos and compare, you will have very big help for successfully building Newman generator.

According to Byron Brubaker, Jo had helium filled inside of those rotating permanent magnets. Apparently, if a glass globe were to be filled with helium and wrapped with a copper winding, then interesting EMs occurs in that winding. This I can't account for in my simulations except that I hint at a second source of energy sourced from these rotations blending with the DC coming from the battery pack.

According to Byron Brubaker, Jo had helium filled inside of those rotating permanent magnets. Apparently, if a glass globe were to be filled with helium and wrapped with a copper winding, then interesting EMs occurs in that winding. This I can't account for in my simulations except that I hint at a second source of energy sourced from these rotations blending with the DC coming from the battery pack.

But this loss has prompted me to overwork since I have to repost as many missing videos as my patience can tolerate while inspired to make a few more.

I have to publicly thank Anthony Craddock for asking whatever happened to a duplicate location of the video you transcribed after having already privately thanking him. Forgetting about the former video, I reuploaded another plus almost all of the videos showcased on ...https://josephnewman.info/videoshttps://josephnewman.info/misc-vids

I seem to have misplaced one making analogy between homopolar motors / generators and the Newman device probably since I renamed a few upon posting them. Life goes on...

I just got off the phone with Byron in which he assured me that Jo got a boost to his rotating central magnets by using sets of ring magnets surrounding sets of capped PVC pipes (coated with either wax or something similar to prevent getting nasty shocks; I wonder if epoxy would could make do?) acting as canisters containing helium. The magnets supplied an alternating push / pull effect while the helium, being diamagnetic, supplied a repulsive push effect.

I am so glad to see you are finally starting to wise up and not believe everything you see on YouTube or hear about from this source or that source. I actually have an original Joseph Newman Energy Machine book from back in the 1980's. I was very intrigued by what he wrote. But then I saw an article where he was actually driving a car powered by one of his motors and some 9 volt batteries. I am sure you are thinking the same thing I thought. He can run a car on 9 volt batteries! That is amazing! Then I found out he was using a couple of thousand of them connected in series and parallel to give him a couple of thousand volts at a few amps. He was just trading volts for amps. Nothing magical or OU about that at all. I was very disappointed in him.

Now maybe you can understand why those of us that have been at this a while are not so quick to jump on the bandwagon for every guy that comes on YouTube or this forum claiming he's "GOT IT" and then doesn't show any real proof he has anything.

I most definitely believe OU is possible. But I am very skeptical of those making wild claims when they show nothing to back those claims up. And since I have been at this a while I have seen a lot of the same old stuff shown over and over again that still doesn't work.

Respectfully,
Carroll

Nah, he was creating a maximum potential difference to create the magnetic field with minimum input and collapse it with potentially more output.

Ever since I managed to understand Newman's eighth edition enough to simulate it, I've been of the opinion that - although it's overunity - it's not entirely a mystery where the extra energy comes from.

It comes from the spinning magnetic field surrounding the rotating bar magnet/s in the center of the coil. They produce lots of amps, but not much volts. These sinewaves then blend with the square waves arriving from the battery pack, and then chopped up by the commutator, creating a blended waveform.

The massive coil is doing more than merely filter out current flowing from the batteries. It also draws current through the rotating magnetic field surrounding the spinning permanent magnets. As to where this excessive current comes from, I don't know...

But I do know that most of it goes to waste due to the poor coupling coefficient between the spinning magnetic field and the massive coil which surrounds it.

Well....

What helped me understand Dave Bowling's Three Battery Generator was the key advice from him and others replicating his work, to: "hand turn the axle of the D/C brush motor after five minutes of waiting for it to self-start if it should fail to". This is exactly like the Newman motor. Thus, I began to attempt a set of simulations...

It's possible to simulate increased current drawn from a source (the sparking brushes in these examples) whenever the load increases (represented by adding more batteries that need charging) along with decreased current at the initial source (the rotating magnetic field of the magneto rotor represented by the A/C voltage source in these simulations) ....

The most interesting part is that it matters what the wiring position of the brushes are in relation to the commutator. If they're on the side of the commutator facing the rotor coils, then OverUnity will result. But if the brushes are sparking on the side of the commutator opposite the rotor coils facing the circuit surrounding the D/C motor / alternator, then smooth half sinewaves (similar to a crystal radio audio output) will result and no OverUnity...

The most interesting part is that it matters what the wiring position of the brushes are in relation to the commutator. If they're on the side of the commutator facing the rotor coils, then OverUnity will result. But if the brushes are sparking on the side of the commutator opposite the rotor coils facing the circuit surrounding the D/C motor / alternator, then smooth half sinewaves (similar to a crystal radio audio output) will result and no OverUnity...

Vinyasi,

Could you provide a picture of this so I can visualize the orientation of the sparks in relation to the magnetic field?

According to Byron Brubaker, Jo had helium filled inside of those rotating permanent magnets. Apparently, if a glass globe were to be filled with helium and wrapped with a copper winding, then interesting EMs occurs in that winding. This I can't account for in my simulations except that I hint at a second source of energy sourced from these rotations blending with the DC coming from the battery pack.

Before I mention what I'm going to mention as referenced by the above title, I would like to state that I went back and corrected a majority of images so that they now display in this thread. Who know how long they will last?

Patent Application #WO2006101494A1, at least the PDF version of it, shows what I believe to be diagrams of the commutator assembly used in the so-called "Big Eureka" energy device.

Here is the commutator, according to the patent application. This is it. I recognize it:

So simple, and yet so elegant

https : // postimg . cc /
LJk1sm13/6ca11181

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patent Application #WO2006101494A1

Fig. 2 is standard double hub 3 for battery contacts with leads 4 and 5 leading to opposite firing segments of No. 1 with shortout segments 2 that are connected with dark solid line from segment 2 to other segment 2. That design results in a collapsing magnetic field of coil 5 of Fig. 1 producing current and magnetic field that maintains torque on rotating 20# magnet 1 of Fig. 1. Direction of input current is reversed, of course, at every 1/2 cycle.

Before I mention what I'm going to mention as referenced by the above title, I would like to state that I went back and corrected a majority of images so that they now display in this thread. Who know how long they will last?

For I long time, I wondered about the construction of the commutator. Luckily, I ran across this patent application (WO2006101494A1). I'm so glad I found it. I think it clears up a lot of the questions I had.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WO2006101494A1

This energy producing electromagnetic or magnetic device is capable of reaching the power output which is greater than the power input into said device.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WO2006101494A1

Fig. 1 shows top view and explains with the description of the embodiment how one skilled in the art could build their pioneering magnetic and/or electromagnetic motor.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WO2006101494A1

Fig. 2 shows side view of commutator for tweaking invention depicted in Fig. 1 in order to use the collapsing magnetic field and current produced by the invention when the input voltage and current are broken during the cycle; and is explained with the description of the invention of Fig. 1.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WO2006101494A1

Fig. 3 shows side view of adjustable firing of brushes leading to the motor of Fig. 1 that further tweaks the timing of the invention of Fig. 1 relative to its speed; and is explained with the description of the invention of Fig. 1.