Almost a Home Run for the Climate

Today, some of the world’s biggest companies collectively made a huge commitment that could be some of the best news to come out of Cancun during the week of climate talks. The Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) -- an industry consortium of 400 companies with combined revenue of $2.8 trillion -- agreed to eliminate HFCs from all new cooling equipment starting in 2015. The CGF companies are the major leagues.

CGF was formed in 2009 and Muhtar Kent, the Chair of Coca-Cola became the Co-Chair of the group in 2010. Its current theme is sustainability (of course) and refrigeration is one of its four focus areas.

HFCs are the status quo for refrigeration in the world. They keep things cold – food, buildings, vending machines, coolers and they comprise the first or second largest piece of the carbon footprint for many, if not most, of the CGF members. As another billion people get refrigeration and cooling, these chemicals’ contribution to the global warming load could prove catastrophic. And they are fairly easily replaced. Greenpeace has been campaigning against them since they were first introduced almost 20 years ago.

At our urging, Coca-Cola was the first company to commit to eliminating HFCs from all of their new equipment by 2015. So when I was invited to give the keynote speech at the CGF Sustainability Refrigeration Summit last month in Chicago, I thought there might be a real opportunity. About 50 large multinationals and a dozen refrigeration suppliers attended. Egged on by some pretty aggressive corporate allies, I called on the group to follow the lead of Coca-Cola, Pepsico and Unilever (all of whom were leading by example on this issue). asked the CGF membership to eliminate HFCS from all new equipment by 2015.

To my astonishment, the group agreed. But this isn’t a home run yet – the corporations are rounding third, but haven’t quite made it to home plate. By the time the 50 member Board of the CGF got to vote, they inserted the word “begin” into the resolution. Therefore, they will “begin” phasing out these chemicals by 2015. Many of these companies intend to complete the phase out by 2015—some are already well on their way. When the largest users replace a technology, it becomes an easy choice for corporations to use the natural refrigerant equipment anyway – it’ll be cheaper! In addition, we’ll be working on banning HFCs, and lifting regulations against many of the best alternatives.

Now if government will only change policy and regulation to accommodate this rapid transformation, we will have our home run. Meanwhile, it’s a solid triple with several men on base.

The only real cause of pollution is overpopulation. Those who believe in anthroprogenic warming need to put their money where there beliefs are. To sa...

The only real cause of pollution is overpopulation. Those who believe in anthroprogenic warming need to put their money where there beliefs are. To save mother earth we need less people. So, if global warming supporters want to reduce the human carbon footprint they should take their own lives. If half of the population is sure global warming is real, they need to be willing to die for their cause. That would stop the destruction of the ecosystem. Half the people = half the pollution = stopping global warming. Going green will only permit more people to live off the same carbon footprint. The answer is population reduction. If you are for real, and believe in the cause, kill yourself, for mother earth. China was so brave, now its our turn! Lets die for the earth!

Post a comment

OPTIONAL: Sign in now and avoid filling in forms! Not registered?
Sign up here
or login via facebook or google.

(Unregistered) aiko2011
says:

It is true that the biggest cause of pollution is over population. Though you will never get people to kill themselves to improve this problem. It doe...

It is true that the biggest cause of pollution is over population. Though you will never get people to kill themselves to improve this problem. It does irritate me that this web site is dedicated to the truth of global warming yet it does not mention the biggest cause. Over population!!! I know it is not a popular topic because everyone want to feel like every life is so very important, but our society is build on expansion. There for we only progress if we grow and growing kills habitats and makes it so the earth cannot support us. Why is it so hard to point this obvious fact out?!!! It needs to be addressed as bad as the Exxon issues if not worse! Killing people is not the way, duu! You preach that education is key to saving the environment; then educate the fact that we cannot sustain a growing population and save the earth and all its inhabitants!! It’s the ugly truth. And it needs to start being thought about!! Environmentalist- put your money where your mouth is. Address the “unpopular” main cause!! There are solutions that don’t require killing. Think quality over quantity.

Blog Comments

All comments on the Greenpeace blogs are moderated before they appear on the site, and this takes time. We appreciate your patience and ask that you refrain from posting the same comment repeatedly. When posting a blog comment, please be respectful and follow our policy.

Want to learn more about tax-deductible giving, donating stock and estate planning? Visit Greenpeace Fund, a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) charitable entity created to increase public awareness and understanding of environmental issues through research, the media and educational programs.