On 5/3/2013 1:50 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:
>> On 5/3/2013 1:14 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>>> And the IESG can request that the RFC-Editor not publish.
>>>> Only for dangerous or end-run around IETF process. Not for mere quality
>> issues.
> The IETF process itself can lead to non-publishing. How many more
> RFCs are there than expired I-Ds?
Expired can mean abandoned for various reasons (lack of resources,
etc.), not just rejected from publication.
The key metric is how many IDs were rejected after being submitted for
publication.
Joe