Lizards Enter the LGF Comment Archives at their Own Risk

Contrary to teh Johnson’s rather lame excuse as to why the 6+ million older comments are hidden, we believe that he’s really pretty sensitive about them and bonkers paranoid when it comes to independent lizard expeditions into comments past. In fact, we wouldn’t be surprised if CJ’s rigged some blinky thing or tone to alert him the second that a registered user uses the comment search at all. Just look what happened today to one of the “class of 2004“:

@lizardoid Why did you block my 2004-LGF account? I was looking in the old comments, is that not allowed?

Going forward, if your nic isn’t on a short list of trusted sycophants, you might want to ask us first if you’re looking to find something in the archives (after all, The World’s Greatest Blog Search Engine™ is a hoot).

We’re happy to help.

[Addendum– CroMagnon was spotted on the DoD MojoTwitterWire earlier today. Cool captures and conversations are in the comments on this thread, including the entire archive of Mr. Cro’s contributions on LGF. – Briareus]

Related

94 Comments on “Lizards Enter the LGF Comment Archives at their Own Risk”

Charles… you’ll go crazy. LGF is in your head. You only have two choices for the rest of your life. Shut it down… or baby sit your little self made mutant for the rest of your life. Because if you keep it live, there are always going to be someone digging through your pass. It’s almost like a Twilight Zone episode. Charles… you don’t own LGF… it owns YOU!

LGF and Charles really paralell a madman and his dictatorship. At one point they are all powerful, but they kill enough people, alienate enough people and eventually they wind up in a bunker with one or two co-dependant sycophants who swallow the cyanide after they burn the dictator’s body

what we see here is the DoD gaining power and Mad King charles isolating himself more and more and as the walls crumble he gets more paranoid and his handful of supporters make the decision to ride that wave to the end

…No real thought going on over there. They repeat what they are told without thought;
…Pipeline to texas will provide oil to china
…*No mention that the pipeline west from the oilsands will actually provide oil to china thus exposing the faudulent and badly constructed lie.
…Very few jobs will be created
…*No thought as to the change in economy when a cheap source of nearby oil gives us a closer source bidding against nations who do not have our best interests at heart and the resulting vigor that directly comes from cheaper energy.
…Its a danger to the aquifer
…*No examination as to the existence of any instance of an oil pipeling ever damaging an aquifer or the how many feet down it would have to penetrate, if any.
…*No mention of the cynicism of delaying an evironmental decision until after the environmentally sensitive public has had a chance to vote for their envionmentally sensitive president.

Nope! They just nod and agree.

4.7 percent bush unemployment; “The Bush Recession!”

Remember “Bush Gas Prices”?

Bush Gitmo? Obama said Gitmo would be closed

Bush’s terrible ties to Saudi oil? So why is obama dragging his feet over Canadian oil? The Saudi’s are still being favored, but now the environment is piously used as the reason.

The republicans are constantly under scrutiny for racism, but no racism is ever seen when democrats;
…support the racism of tha Arab Spring muslim brotherhood governments

…rail against Israel and support anti-Israel entities like occupy wall street and ignore leftwing anti semitism going back to mother russia in the 30’s

…attack black republicans as “uncle toms”

Now the plan is to raise taxes and tax the rich, while we add more regulations to industry and restrict domestic energy.

Gee, what will happen next? I hope you like chinese products.

Unless something changes, I don’t see any reason to vote next year.
Neither side has a candidate or coherent plan that is worth voting for. But if the dems keep on the way they are going, no amount of media spin is going to help us. And I don’t hold republicans to be more than a thin hair better.

All the spin at lgf and from the left in general won’t change the mess we are in, but the left is making it worse, because they are grafted to an economic vision that does not jibe with reality.

I will vote next November, and I will vote with a clear conscience, even if the Republican candidate is a flattened piece of squirrel-hide scraped off the highway after a couple of weeks of curing. I will vote to remove the Empty-Suit and his ungainly, angry wife from the premises of the White House. I hope you will join me.

What do all of these cults have in common? At a certain point, they self-destructed, due to the baleful influence of their “dear leaders,” the mad fools who led them over the edge. Only those who managed to escape the cult prior to their days of reckoning are around to tell the tales. From this day to the end of the world, we shall remember – we few, we happy few, we band of brothers (and sisters).

Actually, judging from the date of my first comment it seems I was from the Class of 2003… but I noticed my account said registered in Oct 2004… must have been some site/account update happening in those days…

Unfortunately we have no control over Akismet, the spam filter, except to smack it around when it gets dickish. You are not being held in moderation intentionally. It does get pissy when there are too many links, so give us a heads up when it happens and someone will get you out of purgatory.

This is just a reminder of what a lying sack of shit Charles Johnson is.

Yes Charles, I am talking to you and I am calling you a liar.

This comment by Charles Johnson is typical of his lies and his dishonesty. He tries to take the moral high ground, tries to appear innocent.

I quote. the timestamp shows it was deleted very soon after I posted it (8 years ago!), probably because I didn’t like it

That sounds very reasonable. I will give you the whole comment so you can see that statement in context.

08873035 37944 241 Charles Fri, Jan 21, 2011 12:45:24pm

Ah, I see Patterico’s moving straight to stalker talking points now. Through obsessive searching of years-old comments, they’ve discovered that I once deleted a comment in which I (gasp!) used the term “Saint Pancake.”

I had to look up the comment in the DB because I don’t remember it, and the reason is simple – the timestamp shows it was deleted very soon after I posted it (8 years ago!), probably because I didn’t like it (as I’ve always said), regretted using it, and didn’t want to encourage its use. I say “probably” because this was so long ago and so completely insignificant I have no memory of it at all. I didn’t “lie” about it – I didn’t remember it. I’ve posted more than 45,000 comments over the life of LGF, in addition to nearly 38,000 articles. Anyone who thinks I remember each and every one, even the deleted ones, has a much higher opinion of my memory and intelligence than I do.

I’d say this is pathetic how they’re reaching back for every tiny comment I ever made to find a smear, but if they want to waste their time I say go for it. And it’s ironic that the people who are most enthusiastically promoting the smear are exactly the same people who were banned for using “St. Pancake” constantly — and for much worse.

See, it all sounds so innocent, Charles said something in May 2003, instantly regretted it and deleted it. Years later we dug up the fact that he said “Saint Pancake” and used in against him even though he deleted it soon after! the timestamp shows it was deleted very soon after I posted it

Charles Johnson blocked the Wayback Machine which is an Internet archiving project. The aim of the project is to take snapshots of websites and to create an historical record of the Internet.

Charles does not want his history recorded.

Several weeks ago Charles fucked up and allowed his history to be revealed. We took the oportunity to submit a snapshot of the Wayback Machine to a place called WebCite which does the same sort of thing. It preserves history.

You guys still with me? We got a history preserving site to save the history of a website that preserves history that preserved a copy of an article at Little Green Footballs.

The state of the article that we are interested in at Little Green Footballs was saved on Feb 2nd 2006. Yep, that was the day the Wayback machine grabbed it.

The article was posted May 9th 2003.

So…. Charles Johnson’s famous comment that he deleted very soon after he posted it was not deleted until AFTER Feb 2nd 2006, we don’t know when it was deleted, but we can say with 100% certainty he didn’t delete it for at least two years plus.

He claimed he had never used that term. But in order to be able to state that definitively, one who have to search ….and in searching, one would have the opportunity, and the temptation to, well… uh, “correct” …errors that may or may not have previously existed.

What does it matter whether he said it or not? Either way he made it clear he thought Rachel Corrie was a useful idiot to the enemies of Israel and the US. Enemies that only pretend to be oppressed by them but in reality are clearly waging war because they are Islamists and jew haters.

This isn’t true anymore Charles? Hamas and Hezbollah have no choice and are truly peaceful? Israelis are the aggressors and terrorists now and deserve to have their civilians murdered? You believe this now and that’s why you want to hide your earlier derision of Corrie?

When I checked a few minutes ago, there was nothing left in the spam filter or in the pending approval file. That means that your post has been posted on the thread at the time and date you sent it. I’ve not heard of any accidental deletions here to date.

CJ-2008: This is where the election is headed, with help from the mainstream media: any and all criticism or opposition to Barack Obama will be labeled “racism”

———————————————————————————————–

CJ-2011: Rick Perry tells Parade Magazine that after having dinner with Ronald Trump, he’s suddenly “undecided” whether President Obama is really an American citizen.
…Who knows whether Perry really buys this racist paranoia himself – but he definitely recognizes its apeal to a right wing base that’s utterly disconnected from reality.

I once contemplated going into the chocolate industry, but when I realized how much my chocholate would appeal to racists, I let that dream go. There’s no fucking way my chocolate will pander to racists.

Elk are just gay moose, just like reindeer are gay caribou, and dolphins are gay sharks. Swedes are not gay Finns, though, contrary to rumor. Swedes are just…Swedes. Finns are like a whole other species. They’re loners, like wolverines, and have to live in isolated pockest of frozen northern tundra, like the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.

And someday (soon) this snowflake will be working somewhere, helping customers or clients, or maybe even tasked with making important decisions. “We can’t move the rocket fuel to the launch pad today, I’m wearing sparkles, and when I’m wearing sparkles we can only install computers in the launch vehicle.”

garycooper :Elk are just gay moose, just like reindeer are gay caribou, and dolphins are gay sharks. Swedes are not gay Finns, though, contrary to rumor. Swedes are just…Swedes. Finns are like a whole other species. They’re loners, like wolverines, and have to live in isolated pockest of frozen northern tundra, like the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.

What’s not to love? The scenery, the snow, the bears…and the people! You’ve got your Finnish malcontents, bred with your bitter Native American alkies, kept cooped-up in little cabins in the woods for nine months out of the year. The results are stunning.

Do you think Chunky’s formally apologized to Dan Rather and Mary Mapes yet? I think his current crop of seethe-y minions would appreciate a look back at his comments regarding that incident. I know it wasn’t Chunky’s scoop to begin with, but he sure tried to take credit for it!

Now that I think about it some more, in addition to the comment search, CJ could also have it rigged such that any registered lizard who is on article #31778 or older triggers an alarm. It would be a piece of cake to program, and a pretty lethal sock-buster.

It’s a beautiful thing to watch. Whether he wants to or has to, he is watching. And every step he takes is back toward a corner.
The BRC vs Charlie is not an even match.
More like Los Gatos vs. El Raton. Stick another claw up his ass. 🙂

Mittens is worse. If nothing else were to distinguish them, Gingrich is better on Second Amendment issues than Romney. Romney is pretty bottom-of-the-barrel when it comes to the Second Amendment. Theoretically he’d be better than Obama, butthat is a pretty low bar to cross.

ABC seems pretty chipper about their interview with Marianne Gingrich, who HATES Newt with a passion akin to that felt by Chunky in regards to his own spurning by Pamela. She won’t be stumping for him, so much as character-assassinating him. Which he may well deserve.