Re: American Cancer Society IRATE over donation from National Alliance and Stormfront!!!

You know, if you think about it. I'le bet if the Crips or the Bloods made a donation they would be squeeling with delight.
The jewsmedia would carry it coast to coast to show White America how wonderful negros are, even the criminals!
Do you think if the Black panthers made a donation they wouldn't jump for joy and make sure the entire world knew about it?
As that great black leader Al Sharpton would say, "It's a clear cut case of discriminisationism!"

__________________

“The world’s population needs to be reduced by 50%,” and “The elderly are useless eaters”

Re: American Cancer Society IRATE over donation from National Alliance and Stormfront

There, read this:

American Cancer Society Boycott
3-31-1

The American Cancer Society (ACS) is a well-known organization that presents itself as an advocate and resource for cancer victims. The ACS is a very large organization that provides research grants, public outreach, and expert advice on matters of public health relating to cancer.

All this sounds great, but there are troubling truths about (1) who gives the ACS money, (2) what the ACS tells the public about the causes of cancer, (3) what the ACS tells the public about cancer treatment and cancer prevention, and (4) what research the ACS funds and what research the ACS blocks.

The ACS receives money from chemical companies and pharmaceutical companies and, in exchange, the ACS protects their political and economic interests. Particularly, the ACS: (1) protects the corporate polluters that cause cancer by telling the public there is no connection between environmental pollution, food additives and cancer, (2) protects pharmaceutical companies by attacking natural, non-patentable, non-pharmaceutical forms of cancer treatment. The ACS also wastes millions of dollars on excessive overhead and high salaries.

Therefore, legitimate grassroots organizations honestly trying to PREVENT cancer (e.g. The Cancer Prevention Coalition) have called for a BOYCOTT of the American Cancer Society.

The ACS is riddled with conflicts-of-interest in advocating public health. Over the last two decades, an increasing proportion of the ACS budget comes from large corporations, including the pharmaceutical, cancer drug, and chemical industries: ACS Boardmember Gordon Binder, CEO of Amgen, the world's foremost biotechnology company, with over $1 billion in product sales in 1992. Amgen's success rests almost exclusively on one product, Neupogen, a chemotherapy adjunct. As the cancer epidemic grows, sales for Neupogen continue to skyrocket. Mr. Binder profits from increasing cancer rates.

ACS Boardmember David R. Bethune, president of Lederle Laboratories, a multinational pharmaceutical company and a division of American Cyanamid Company. Bethune is also vice president of American Cyanamid, which makes chemical fertilizers and pesticides while transforming itself into a full-fledged pharmaceutical company. In 1988, American Cyanamid introduced Novatrone, an anti-cancer drug. And in 1992, it announced that it would buy a majority of shares of Immunex, a cancer drug maker. Mr. Bethune profits from increasing cancer rates and from public ignorance of the links between pollution and cancer.

ACS trustees include an executive from Glaxo-Wellcome, a manufacturer of chemotherapy drugs, and an executive from Pfizer, a pharmaceutical company with investments in cancer drugs. $100,000+ contributors to the ACS include carcinogen polluters General Electric and Dupont, and pharmaceutical companies Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Novartis, and Smith-Kline Beecham.

The American Cancer Society is fixated on damage control— diagnosis and treatment— and basic molecular biology, with indifference or even hostility to cancer prevention. This myopic mindset is compounded by interlocking conflicts of interest with the cancer drug, mammography, and other industries. The "nonprofit" status of the Society is in sharp conflict with its high overhead and expenses, excessive reserves of assets and contributions to political parties. All attempts to reform the Society over the past two decades have failed; a national economic boycott of the Society is long overdue.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) is accumulating great wealth in its role as a "charity." According to James Bennett, professor of economics at George Mason University and recognized authority on charitable organizations, in 1988 the ACS held a fund balance of over $400 million with about $69 million of holdings in land, buildings, and equipment (1). Of that money, the ACS spent only $90 million— 26 percent of its budget— on medical research and programs. The rest covered "operating expenses," including about 60 percent for generous salaries, pensions, executive benefits, and overhead. By 1989, the cash reserves of the ACS were worth more than $700 million (2). In 1991, Americans, believing they were contributing to fighting cancer, gave nearly $350 million to the ACS, 6 percent more than the previous year. Most of this money comes from public donations averaging $3,500, and high-profile fund-raising campaigns such
as the springtime daffodil sale and the May relay races. However, over the last two decades, an increasing proportion of the ACS budget comes from large corporations, including the pharmaceutical, cancer drug, telecommunications, and entertainment industries.

In 1992, the American Cancer Society Foundation was created to allow the ACS to actively solicit contributions of more than $100,000. However, a close look at the heavy-hitters on the Foundation's board will give an idea of which interests are at play and where the Foundation expects its big contributions to come from. The Foundation's board of trustees included corporate executives from the pharmaceutical, investment, banking, and media industries. Among them:

* David R. Bethune, president of Lederle Laboratories, a multinational pharmaceutical company and a division of American Cyanamid Company. Bethune is also vice president of American Cyanamid, which makes chemical fertilizers and herbicides while transforming itself into a full-fledged pharmaceutical company. In 1988, American Cyanamid introduced Novatrone, an anti-cancer drug. And in 1992, it announced that it would buy a majority of shares of Immunex, a cancer drug maker.

* Gordon Binder, CEO of Amgen, the world's foremost biotechnology company, with over $1 billion in product sales in 1992. Amgen's success rests almost exclusively on one product, Neupogen, which is administered to chemotherapy patients to stimulate their production of white blood cells. As the cancer epidemic grows, sales for Neupogen continue to skyrocket.

Re: American Cancer Society IRATE over donation from National Alliance and Stormfront!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreeByrd

I think we need to find out if the naacp or another negro group has given donations. If so then that would be good ammo. Why are they taken donations from negro racist groups. If the naacp hasn't given any dontations that is good ammo too. Why is it a White civil rights group can but a negro group can't.

Gloria Sweet-Love

Spreading the Word

“You know the old saying: ‘What you don’t know won’t hurt you’? Well, when it comes to breast cancer awareness, I say: ‘What you don’t know will kill you.’” This is what American Cancer Society volunteer Gloria Sweet-Love tells her community in Haywood County, Tenn. As the State President of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Sweet-Love is highly regarded as a resource for information.
That is one of the reasons American Cancer Society Community Outreach Specialist Rhonda Jones teamed up with Sweet-Love to raise the awareness of breast cancer issues with underserved African-American women in Haywood County.

Below is a letter I received from the American Cancer Society. If I read it correctly...they're hinting that someone is not telling the truth? It was clearly understood by anyone contributing, that their donations would be on behalf of the Hudson Valley National Alliance, and Stormfront.org.

I think I'm going to sit down sometime next week, and write a letter to the Amercan Cancer Society. Stay tuned...

Looks like the American Cancer Society is in cahoots with a "racist" organization!

The NAACP Health Division goals include: Developing national health advocacy and education initiatives that promote equity in health status
Strengthening and organizing new NAACP branch health committees
Sponsoring collaborative initiatives with other national and local health groups
Expanding outreach on health advocacy and awareness in communities We encourage you to get involved in improving the health of our people by contacting your local NAACP branch.

Re: American Cancer Society IRATE over donation from National Alliance and Stormfront!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by NAACP

Resolutions from NAACP Conventions, Board of Directors and health conferences constitute the NAACP health policy. Our health policy is the basis for a continuing number of short and long- term partnerships with organizations such as the American Cancer Society, Intercultural Cancer Council, National Kidney Foundation, National Marrow Donor Program and the National Stroke Association.

Re: American Cancer Society IRATE over donation from National Alliance and Stormfront!!!

I think what you did was wonderful. I believe that they were wrong to act the way they did.

This just goes to show you how powerful the jewish controlled media is. They have so brainwashed society to how evil we are, that even when we do something to help others we get them irate. I fear that if it had been a non white group who fought to perserve their heritage they would have accepted it gladly.

I am sorry that this group ACS can't see beyond what the media tells them to believe.