Here we review the international evidence for benefits and risks of infant male circumcision (MC) and use this to develop an evidence-based policy statement for a developed nation setting, focusing on Australia. Evidence from good quality studies that include meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials showed that MC provides strong protection against: urinary tract infections and, in infancy, renal parenchymal disease; phimosis; paraphimosis; balanoposthitis; foreskin tearing; some heterosexually transmitted infections including HPV, HSV-2, trichomonas, HIV, and genital ulcer disease; thrush; inferior hygiene; penile cancer and possibly prostate cancer. In women, circumcision of the male partner protects against HPV, HSV-2, cervical cancer, bacterial vaginosis, and possibly Chlamydia. MC has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, penile sensation or satisfaction and may enhance the male sexual experience. Adverse effects are uncommon (<1%), and virtually all are minor and easily treated. For maximum benefits, safety, convenience and cost savings, MC should be performed in infancy and with local anesthesia. A risk-benefit analysis shows benefits exceed risks by a large margin. Over their lifetime up to half of uncircumcised males will suffer a medical condition as a result of retaining their foreskin. The ethics of infant MC and childhood vaccination are comparable. Our analysis finds MC is beneficial, safe and cost-effective, and should optimally be performed in infancy. In the interests of public health and individual wellbeing, adequate parental education, and steps to facilitate access and affordability should be encouraged in developed countries.

Smith, D.K., Taylor, A., Kilmarx, P.H., et al. (2010) Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: Report from a CDC consultation. Public Health Reports, 125, 72-82.

Macdonald, A., Humphreys, J. and Jaffe, H.W. (2008) Prevention of HIV transmission in the United Kingdom: What is the role of male circumcision? Sexually Transmitted Infections, 84, 158-160.
doi:10.1136/sti.2008.029934

Schoen, E.J., Colby, C.J. and Ray, G.T. (2000) Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections in the first year of life. Pediatrics, 105, 789-793. doi:10.1542/peds.105.4.789

Coulthard, M.G., Lambert, H.J. and Keir, M.J. (1997) Occurrence of renal scars in children after their first referral for urinary tract infection. British Medical Journal, 315, 918-919. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7113.918

Yardley, I.E., Cosgrove, C. and Lambert, A.W. (2007) Paediatric preputial pathology: Are we circumcising enough? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 89, 62-65. doi:10.1308/003588407X160828

Ferris, J.A., Richters, J., Pitts, M.K., et al. (2010) Circumcision in Australia: Further evidence on its effects on sexual health and wellbeing. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34, 160-164.
doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00501.x

Agius, P.A., Pitts, M.K., Smith, A.M., et al. (2010) Sexual behaviour and related knowledge among a representative sample of secondary school students between 1997 and 2008. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 34, 467-481.
doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00593.x

Beckman, L.J., Harvey, S.M. and Tiersky, L.A. (1996) Attitudes about condoms and condom use among college students. The Journal of American College Health, 44, 243-249. doi:10.1080/07448481.1996.9936851

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) HIV/AIDS science facts. Male circumcision and risk for HIV transmission and other health conditions: Implications for the United States.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm

Waldinger, M.D., McIntosh, J. and Schweitzer, D.H. (2009) A five-nation survey to assess the distribution of the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time among the general male population. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2888-2895. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01392.x

Morris, B.J., Waskett, J.H. and Gray, R.H. (2011) Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? International Journal of Epidemiology, E-pub ahead of print Nov 28.

Mao, L.M., Templeton, D.J., Crawford, J., et al. (2008) Does circumcision make a difference to the sexual experience of gay men? Findings from the Health in Men (HIM) Cohort. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 2557-2561. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00845.x

Morris, B.J. (2010) Why medical bodies and others should not advise that circumcision should be delayed until the boy can make the decision for himself.
http://www.circinfo.net/circumcision_why_you_should_not_delay.html

Leibowitz, A.A., Desmond, K. and Belin, T. (2009) Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States. The American Journal of Public Health, 99, 138-145. doi:0.2105/AJPH.2008.134403