It looks like it's not easy to reach consensus even for native English speakers.
Should we move on to numbers as David Singer suggested?
20: newspaper
50: normal
80: strict
I can live without names if that makes everyone happy.
Regards,
Koji
-----Original Message-----
From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 1:01 PM
To: John Hudson
Cc: Koji Ishii; David Singer; Brady Duga; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css3-text] alternate name for line-break: newspaper
On 12/21/2010 09:52 PM, John Hudson wrote:
> fantasai wrote:
>> If we need to add a third level, we can call it "lenient" or "relaxed"
>> line-break: normal | strict | loose | relaxed
>
> I would switch those around (with the final three in order from strictest to least strict):
>
> line-break: normal | strict | relaxed | loose
>
> It's like shopping for jeans: relaxed fit comes before loose fit.
Um, yeah, that's what I meant. :)
> Since the idea of the least strict style is a minimal set of restrictions, how about
>
> line-break: normal | strict | relaxed | basic
The problem is that "basic" then becomes confusable with "normal".
~fantasai