In the 1850â€™s Auguste Comte (famous now as the father of sociology) worked out an elaborate system of religious observance based on humanism, positivism, and rational scientific progress.

If it was just a phase, it would be Comteâ€™s last. Â He died in 1857 â€” but his influential ideas about the application of reason to cultural and religious matters would soon lead to â€œTemples of Humanityâ€ built in France and Brazil.

It was all founded on Science and Progress and Liberty â€” but to manage our humanism, this new religion did indeed install priests, prayers, saints (including Isaac Newton), and even a manner of â€œcrossingâ€ oneself that stimulated the phrenological points for Good Works (see John Grayâ€™s Al Qaeda and What It Means to be Modern,Faber & Faber, 2003, for much more â€” and details on how the very many flavors of fundamentalism issue directly from idealistic moderns).

The Church of VirusÂ (apparently still active at least as late as May, 2011) dresses up similar notions in religious trappings – but does so in blatantly and unapologetically transhuman style. Â How many cults (we could name a few: Raelism, Scientology, Heavenâ€™s Gate) take it as their mandate to re-educate people in the name of some sloppy imagining of â€œscientific progressâ€? Â The trend has worked down deep into many mainstream religious groups as well. Â The Southern Baptist Convention, for example, in â€œreaching the world for Christ,â€ is still pushing a modernist agenda to convert the pagan and prepare the world for unity under their own â€œrational theologyâ€ and systematic doctrines of salvation.Â

But the â€œsocial physicsâ€ of Comteâ€™sÂ Positivist religion sits somehow simultaneously in two opposing camps. Â On the one hand, it is clearly a religion (rites, churches, an eye toward â€œprogressâ€ through the spread of values). Â But on the other, it is anti-religious, or at least atheistic. Â The principles were that Humanity itself, not gods, would develop and push rational moral systems across the earth to all peoples â€” and all of it would be based on science, order, and reason rather than inherited beliefs, myths, or superstitions.

In a different time and place, and under different economic pressures, Positivism could have become something a lot more like Maoâ€™s Cultural Revolution.

The New Atheists are fond of citing religion (crusades, jihad) as a cause for blood and terror; their critics are fond of citing the terrors atheists brought down on millions under Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot. Â Both sides miss the point. Â The point is that violent ideology causes blood and terror, and that violent ideology can be religious, anti-religious, or psuedo-religious.

The eschatologyÂ of transhumanism, past militant statements,Â by transhumanists, and the overly simplistic dismissal of history (dull, dirty, dumb) in favor of a cartoonishly idealized future (fun, sexy, smart — hey, no war & no worries!) should give us all pause. It sounds familiar.

Search

About Acceler8or:

R.U. Sirius brings you ACCELER8OR.Use us as your thoroughfare for accelerating technoculture & screaming memes, with a side order of strangeness and charm. Read articles and interviews which illuminate the New Edge culture.

Warning:This site may contain unlabelled irreverence and subtle playfulness.Humorless and hypersensitive people should proceed with caution.