Let them regress (jk)
But women's rights only came into being because the people in power knew that if women worked and got out of being stay-at-home mom's that they could be taxed. Because before then they could only tax 50% of the population, now they could tax everyone, and guess who would benefit from such a thing? Obama.

You've said several times your wife makes more money than you. I think Dodge 7 personally benefits from women's rigth to work more than Obama, or most people.

I think womens right groups point to increased female workforce participation as a choice and victory, but it is more economic necessity and not choice.

I don't think this is due to Reagan's policies, or Clinton's policies, or Obama's, or Bushes. It wasn't because of the government. The trend happened during their periods of office, but that's all. It happened in other countries too.

It is happening now in S Korea. Housing and living costs have gone up so much, women must work too to cover them.

Women will continue to work and get to higher level positions because they are working more, and because they are getting well educated (think about university it was pretty even men/women).

Women will also get richer than before, because the economy has shifted to reward brains over brawns (the manufacturing jobs have gone).

Joined: 28 Jan 2003Location: It's not a superiority complex when you really are superior

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:04 pm Post subject:

bucheon bum wrote:

Dodge7 wrote:

Obama is a puppet and the economy has gotten worse every year he's been in office (and he's still blaming Bush lol) and the unemployment has gone up still since he's been in office. Not to mention he spends money like a millionaire with a week to live. Spent MORE money than ALL previous presidents C-O-M-B-I-N-E-D.
He sucks, and he's getting the boot in November, thank God.l

Do you have any link or stat to back that assertion up? And if you factor in inflation, that's wrong.

In regards to November, unfortunately for you, polls say otherwise right now. Obama is currently favored to win next month.

It all depends on the polls you read.

If one were to Google say "Polls put Rommy ahead of Obama" he would be presented with a number of polls that say just that
such as the( latest) CBS poll, the Pew poll, RealClearPolitics Poll and the Rasmussen poll.

As for Obama spending more money I agree with what you said. Also is that not CONGRESS that has control over the purse strings...as opposed to the President?

Obama is a puppet and the economy has gotten worse every year he's been in office (and he's still blaming Bush lol) and the unemployment has gone up still since he's been in office. Not to mention he spends money like a millionaire with a week to live. Spent MORE money than ALL previous presidents C-O-M-B-I-N-E-D.
He sucks, and he's getting the boot in November, thank God.l

Do you have any link or stat to back that assertion up? And if you factor in inflation, that's wrong.

In regards to November, unfortunately for you, polls say otherwise right now. Obama is currently favored to win next month.

It all depends on the polls you read.

If one were to Google say "Polls put Rommy ahead of Obama" he would be presented with a number of polls that say just that
such as the( latest) CBS poll, the Pew poll, RealClearPolitics Poll and the Rasmussen poll.

As for Obama spending more money I agree with what you said. Also is that not CONGRESS that has control over the purse strings...as opposed to the President?

No, it doesn't depend on the polls you read. Because the optimal way to read polls is to read them ALL, then average them, like these:

Obama is a puppet and the economy has gotten worse every year he's been in office (and he's still blaming Bush lol) and the unemployment has gone up still since he's been in office. Not to mention he spends money like a millionaire with a week to live. Spent MORE money than ALL previous presidents C-O-M-B-I-N-E-D.
He sucks, and he's getting the boot in November, thank God.l

Do you have any link or stat to back that assertion up? And if you factor in inflation, that's wrong.

In regards to November, unfortunately for you, polls say otherwise right now. Obama is currently favored to win next month.

It all depends on the polls you read.

If one were to Google say "Polls put Rommy ahead of Obama" he would be presented with a number of polls that say just that
such as the( latest) CBS poll, the Pew poll, RealClearPolitics Poll and the Rasmussen poll.

As for Obama spending more money I agree with what you said. Also is that not CONGRESS that has control over the purse strings...as opposed to the President?

No, it doesn't depend on the polls you read. Because the optimal way to read polls is to read them ALL, then average them, like these:

Or, if you want to read someone else's explanation of all the polls (from a statistics POV, not a political one), I suggest fivethirtyeight in the NYT. I apologize for repeatedly mentioning it, but I've become kinda hooked.

Joined: 28 Jan 2003Location: It's not a superiority complex when you really are superior

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:33 pm Post subject:

Kuros wrote:

TheUrbanMyth wrote:

bucheon bum wrote:

Dodge7 wrote:

Obama is a puppet and the economy has gotten worse every year he's been in office (and he's still blaming Bush lol) and the unemployment has gone up still since he's been in office. Not to mention he spends money like a millionaire with a week to live. Spent MORE money than ALL previous presidents C-O-M-B-I-N-E-D.
He sucks, and he's getting the boot in November, thank God.l

Do you have any link or stat to back that assertion up? And if you factor in inflation, that's wrong.

In regards to November, unfortunately for you, polls say otherwise right now. Obama is currently favored to win next month.

It all depends on the polls you read.

If one were to Google say "Polls put Rommy ahead of Obama" he would be presented with a number of polls that say just that
such as the( latest) CBS poll, the Pew poll, RealClearPolitics Poll and the Rasmussen poll.

As for Obama spending more money I agree with what you said. Also is that not CONGRESS that has control over the purse strings...as opposed to the President?

No, it doesn't depend on the polls you read. Because the optimal way to read polls is to read them ALL, then average them, like these:

Iit is so much better in terms of the women here and in other Asian countries I have been too compared to the women back in the USA.

There is simply no comparison.

So many of these chicks will do anything for you..and I'm talking about the really hot ones too.
No way that would happen back in the USA. Notice I don't call it home because it ain't longer gonna be that anymore. The way the women are here compared with there was a large factor in my decision never to go back. Aw man...if she went there there they would corrupt her big time. I give her just a few stories of what they are like and she is in shock...to the point of not wanting to even go there anyway.

Iit is so much better in terms of the women here and in other Asian countries I have been too compared to the women back in the USA.

There is simply no comparison.

So many of these chicks will do anything for you..and I'm talking about the really hot ones too.
No way that would happen back in the USA. Notice I don't call it home because it ain't longer gonna be that anymore. The way the women are here compared with there was a large factor in my decision never to go back. Aw man...if she went there there they would corrupt her big time. I give her just a few stories of what they are like and she is in shock...to the point of not wanting to even go there anyway.

You're a real dude, +100. The beer anytime is on me.

My woman already spent a couple years in the US, she knows all about how disgusting the women are there and wasn't impressed or moved. They attempted all the standard corruption tactics; "why don't you become a feminist (uhh like they are so happy), why don't you stop being good to your man, why don't you stop cooking for him, why don't you stop being respectful to him until he 'earns it', etc". It didn't work on her because she is free-minded and can't be swayed by fools.

We just find it interesting how they all instinctively want to stop what they view as "their competition" from being good to men, so the local guys don't get used to a good life and realize they are being short-changed in the USA.

Iit is so much better in terms of the women here and in other Asian countries I have been too compared to the women back in the USA.

There is simply no comparison.

So many of these chicks will do anything for you..and I'm talking about the really hot ones too.
No way that would happen back in the USA. Notice I don't call it home because it ain't longer gonna be that anymore. The way the women are here compared with there was a large factor in my decision never to go back. Aw man...if she went there there they would corrupt her big time. I give her just a few stories of what they are like and she is in shock...to the point of not wanting to even go there anyway.

You're a real dude, +100. The beer anytime is on me.

My woman already spent a couple years in the US, she knows all about how disgusting the women are there and wasn't impressed or moved. They attempted all the standard corruption tactics; "why don't you become a feminist (uhh like they are so happy), why don't you stop being good to your man, why don't you stop cooking for him, why don't you stop being respectful to him until he 'earns it', etc". It didn't work on her because she is free-minded and can't be swayed by fools.

We just find it interesting how they all instinctively want to stop what they view as "their competition" from being good to men, so the local guys don't get used to a good life and realize they are being short-changed in the USA.