Holly Mornser, a new mermaid species created by crazed atheist superscientists. These superscientists are trying to play God and prove the ‘big bang’ by creating lust mermaids with giant fish tunnel sinslits to convince men that it’s natural to lust outside the boundaries of natural order.

My anger is kindled high right now! By the power of Satan, atheist superscience has now created real life mermaids! We all knew that gay marriage would be the segue to this type of thing! Now, these atheist genetic scientists have combined the holy seed of mankind with that of a salmon manatee!

They are making these bizarre creatures so we can say, “Oh, they are now combining the homonculi of a man with the eggsacs caviare of a fish. Gay marriage doesn’t seem so bad!”

It’s already bad enough that there are people who believe that a magical big bang lead to space rocks which one day evolved into planets, gravity, tidal forces, endosymbiotic bacteria and eventually you and me. It’s just preposterous. But now they aren’t just using words to twist reality, they are reaching into the handcrafted DNA of God himself and altering it to meet their fantasy.

How long before these Mermaids get human rights? How long before a man wants to marry one of these beasts and have a merman family? What’s to stop atheist from creating hudogs or hucats? They going to marry and get them pregnant too?

Scientists haven’t made a mermaid. Firstly, it isn’t possible. Science hasn’t reached that level quite yet. Right now the most we can really do with science at the moment is modify the more simple creatures/plants, still far away for altering something as complex as a human. Secondly, we still have no idea what most of the DNA in the majority of species actually does at the moment so it is mainly guess work when it comes to altering DNA. Thirdly, pretty sure it is illegal everywhere at the moment to alter a human at the DNA level.

Oh, yeah. Now pre-emptive strike here as I know what the first rebuttal is going to be “the picture is proof”. Firstly, photos can be faked and it is getting easier to do with time. Secondly that picture is roughly 28 years old. It is a photo from the 1984 film Splash. The “mermaid’s” name is Daryl Hannah.

Few questions. How is the creation of a mermaid meant to prove the big bang theory? A connection between the two is far-fetched even for christwire.

Why do you christwire lot constantly use the word evolution? Many of you keep saying it is all a lie so why use the word. Oh yeah and evolution refers to the NATURAL and very gradual process of very small changes over a long period (hundreds/thousands of years) of time to cope with a change in environment. What you keep referring to as evolution is actually genetic manipulation.

Do you actually know what a homunculus is? The way in which you used it suggests you don’t. A homunculus is a very small human/humanoid creature or a supposed microscopic but fully formed human being from which a fetus was formerly believed to develop. The way in which you used it implies you believe the plural is another term for sperm. It isn’t.

If you’re going to claim that ‘atheists evolve real life mermaid’, then by proxy you have to admit that science is right and that you’re wrong, since you see fit to claim that science is entirely wrong.

As part of the genome project, DNA from puffer fish were used to predict sequencing in human DNA. In fact, “nearly 1,000 previously unidentified human genes” were catalogued as a result of the comparison.

No doubt our Creator’s grand blueprint at work here within the code of our DNA.

So, if you read an article in a magazine that uses a ‘stock’ image, is the content deemed inadequate and a lie?

I’ve provided you with verifiable information that the DNA of fish and humans was under scientific comparison nearly a decade ago. Is it not possible Atheist superscientists could use this data to make a mermaid baby?

Yes but science involving DNA progresses a lot slower than you seem to think. It is still mainly guess work. Still undergoing the process of discovering what gene does what and if the largely inactive strands of DNA is important or not.

Exactly. This isn’t moderated Jurassic Park here. DNA is long and difficult to read as moderated and no one has mapped out the human genome yet, what makes you think we’re ready to start making moderated mermaids?

That comparison actually enabled them to PREDICT nearly 1,000 previously unidentified unidentified human genes. The key word there is predict, as in make an educated guess. Those genes are purely hypothetical. It says so the sentence after the quote you removed completely out of context to prove your point. They haven’t found them yet otherwise they wouldn’t be hypothetical. Also it states that their function is unknown. The Genome Project is still years from even approaching completion.

From prediction comes hypothesis. From hypothesis comes experimentation. Science is a forward evolving, continuous process. If scientist held back until all the DNA was decoded, why did they make goats that give spidermilk?

They put a simple gene meant to produce a single protein into a goat. That is a relatively simple process. It is one simple gene that ONLY produces a protein. Simple in scientific terms.

A limb or tail is far more complex. Multiple genes are needed to produce a specific body part and it is a far more complex procedure. Then there is the fact it appears that genes are also needed to control where a specific body part grows. Many of which are still far from being known as scientists haven’t created animals with the limbs of other animals as of yet.

The closest we have got is cross-breading similar species. Still many years (probably even decades/centuries) before scientists understand DNA enough to understand it enough to grow a spliced animal from two drastically different species.

We’ve not even perfected cloning an animal yet. The clones still have genetic defects due to the process and that is just a matter of duplicating the DNA. What on earth makes you think that we can alter the DNA of a creature drastically enough to have a hybrid anything close to a mermaid?

Scientists have only just in the past couple of years can make a goat produce a simple protein through ADDING a single gene without the removal of any vital genes. So they must be able to take two completely different creatures and switch their limbs through genetic modification because that’s just as simple a procedure.

Nope it really isn’t. To paraphrase something is to give it greater clarity by using different phrases. Nothing to do with shortening it shortening it would be a summary.

To paraphrase what I have already said because you are clearly missing my point. Adding genes that produce a single protein. Something that is easy to do. Replacing genes to create body parts far more difficult to do and not possible yet.

If it was, scientists wouldn’t start by creating a mermaid. They’d start by growing organs/limbs to replace damaged/lost ones for transplant.

A stock photo is of an object deemed an accurate representation by the manufacturer of the good. This is an unrelated picture from a movie that is actually even older than any data you have managed to produce.

Yes, because everyone knows that the true intention of atheists is to create an army of animal/human hybrids and are using an 1884 movie as the inspiration for the first chimera. It is either that or they are planning on using genetic manipulation to create multiple mythological beasts in the belief that their existence will once and for all disprove god and prove evolution. Personally I can’t wait for them to create the dragon, be an awesome creature to see in the flesh. I hope they find a way to domesticate it. A dragon would make an awesome pet.

Leave it to someone who believes in a wizard on a cloud to believe that athiests cause more damage than Christians. Leave it to someone who still holds closely a religion that has tricked and brainwashed men into brutally murdering millions of innocent people for the sole purpose of not being Christian.

Hey, i’m new. I’ve always gone on this site, and laughed at horribly photoshoped images and a lunatic screeming hate towards gays. I just now got an account. I guess I have to pick a side, since that seems to be what is going in the comment section…

I guess i pick the atheist,even though I am not atheist. I am a christian, however don’t beleive in mermaids, zebra ants the size of lions, or Justin Beiber being pregnant. I don’t have to use photoshop to prove points. You guys need to man up, and actually use real reasons. If someone could also post why being gay is a sin besides saying,”It says so in the bible”. As long as they don’t touch me I’m okay with them.

The entire argument of Blanche Beecham is “those atheist super scientists have had the time to do it, so it must have been done.” I have yet to see any hard evidence on the actual creation of a real-life mermaid, and will not believe anything posted here until I see some. I cannot believe the picture, because, as pointed out by Jonny, it is from a 1984 movie. And to preemptively answer Beecham’s snide question, I do believe stock photography, only when backed up by an actual event! Stock photos shouldn’t be used to corroborate an argument, just for added effect/decoration. Oh, and technically, this isn’t even stock photography, as it is taken from a specific movie. I might as well add that the ties to the Big Bang and Homosexual rights are just outrageous in this article. I am a Christian as well as a scientist (which you might see as mutually exclusive), and I am appalled by the articles on this entire website. I hope you gain your right mind back quickly, for shipping overweight citizens overseas, lying over scientific development, and perpetuating this stereotype of a crazy Christian is just hurting the sane church-goers of the world.
tldr; the christwire argument is insane, as well as the entire website.

Ok, I just want to say that the author of this article is literally retarded and whoever believes this is slowing the progression of the human race as a whole. I would rather believe in science that religion. Science gives answers, religion gives closure. I want to know why it rains, I don’t want to hear it rains because god works in mysterious ways. Those who can’t think for themselves and formulate their own opinions find religion necessary. I’m an athiest. I don’t need some pedophile in a white collar to tell me what to believe. Having said that, the big bang has been mathematically proven. Suck on that.

Omg, I’m so glad to finally find out that this websie is one big joke! Thank goodness! Idk why they don’t make it more evident on the actual website. I was so worried that there was a group of crazies running around. I feel bad for the writers who get all the hate comments now but they really do stay in character! It really is like, “The Onion!”

You stupid prick of a Bitch. Who the fuck do you think you are? Gay people are people too. And if not evolution, what do u believe? Where is heaven located? Just past Jupiter? People like you make me sick