"Critics argue that giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have an immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien population." JOHN BINDER

"Rohrabacher conceded that he didn’t know if a majority of Republicans in the House currently supported a vote on immigration, but said if they do, it’s only because they’ve been deceived by propaganda from the media and a push from conglomerates looking to import cheap labor."

“Rubio is so confused and so mixed up I think that he has given up his rightful place to advise any of us in Washington what to do, and certainly given up any right to be trusted by the American people,” he said. “It was over and over, contradiction after contradiction, lie after lie.”

HOW BARACK OBAMA DESTROYED THE GOP and AMERICA WITH
BLANKET AMNESTY, NON-ENFORCEMENT, NO E-VERIFY and SABOTAGE OF AMERICAN BORDER
SECURITY and STATES ATTEMPT TO CURB ILLEGALS FROM VOTING…

A
week later, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said the immigration bill was “far worse”
than ObamaCare: He described the bill as an attempt by Senate Democrats “to establish
another monolithic voting bloc” among Hispanic Americans.

THEY JUMP OUR BORDERS
BY INVITATION of the DEMOCRAT PARTY, NOW PARTY FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY!

AWAITING THEM IS “FREE”
MEDICAL, “FREE” EDUCATION, “FREE 18 YEARS OF WELFARE” FOR EVERY ANCHOR BABY,
“FREE” DREAM ACTS of GRINGO-PAID WELFARE”, NO E-VERIFY, AND NO LEGAL NEED
APPLY! … IN OTHER WORDS, EVERYTHING THAT MEXICO DOES NOT PROVIDE THEIR OWN
PEOPLE IS HANDED TO THEM BY THE DEMS ONCE THEY STEP FOOT OVER OUR BORDERS!

There
was a striking moment in the Senate Judiciary Committee's debate on the Gang of
Eight comprehensive immigration reform bill when Republican Jeff Sessions and
Democrat Charles Schumer argued over the number of immigrants who would be
allowed into the country under the new legislation.

Sessions
cited reports suggesting the figure would be more than 20 million over the next
decade in addition to the 11 million or so who are already in the United States
illegally. Schumer took issue with that, although he wouldn't name a figure of
his own.

Then
Schumer declared the whole dispute beside the point. "It is not that, 'Oh,
this bill is allowing many more people to come into this country than would have
come,' " he said. "They are coming. They're either coming under law
or not under law."

The
Democratic leader of the Gang of Eight continued: "This argument that
there are going to be 20 million new people in this country under this bill
ignores the fact that there are going to be lots of millions ... in the country
illegally if we don't have a bill."

What
made the exchange notable was that many Democrats who oppose more stringent
border security measures argue that after recent increases in spending and
resources the U.S.-Mexico border is already pretty secure -- "as secure
now as it has ever been," in the words of Homeland Security Secretary
Janet Napolitano. They also suggest that the number of illegal crossers is at
an all-time low and will likely never rise again to levels seen in the 1990s
and 2000s.

What
Schumer conceded, perhaps in an unguarded moment, is that the border remains
quite porous, and the U.S. can expect "lots of millions" to cross
illegally in coming years if nothing more is done. The disagreement on Capitol
Hill, of course, is over what should be done, but Schumer's off-the-cuff
analysis provides a lot of material for Republicans pressing for a guarantee of
greater security measures before millions of illegal immigrants are given legal
status.

That
GOP position received an even bigger boost Monday with a report from the border
in the New York Times. The crux of the story is that the number of illegal
crossings is rising, and in response to greater security measures in Arizona,
the flow from Mexico has shifted east to the Rio Grande Valley in Texas.

Yes,
the number of illegal crossers is down from a dozen years ago as the U.S.
economy remains a less powerful magnet than it once was. "But after nearly
a decade of steady declines, the count has started to rise again over the past
year," the Times reported. "The Rio Grande Valley has displaced the
Tucson enforcement zone as the hot spot, with makeshift rafts crossing the
river in increasing numbers, high-speed car chases occurring along rural roads
and a growing number of dead bodies turning up on ranchers' land, according to
local officials."

"There
is just so much happening at the same time -- it is overwhelming," a
Brooks County, Texas, sheriff's deputy told the Times.

Border
Patrol agents are outnumbered; extensive, passable stretches of the border are
unwatched; whole groups of immigrants cross unseen. "People are just
crossing without fear," said an alderman in La Joya.

It's
happening in part because the American economy, hit so hard by the economic
downturn, is finally improving, becoming a draw again for immigrants,
especially those from Central America who travel through Mexico on their way to
the Texas border. Also, crime remains a terrible problem in many immigrants'
home countries. And word is spreading that the U.S. Congress is contemplating a
measure to legalize millions of illegal border-crossers.

That
is the backdrop for this week's Senate debate on border security in the Gang of
Eight plan. Democrats are dead set against any proposal that would make
permanent legal status and a path to citizenship contingent on measurable
improvements in border security. On the other side, many Republicans believe
those improvements will never happen unless the law says legalization won't be
allowed without security first. The only question is whether Republicans will
stick to their guns or give in to Democrats.

In
the debate, supporters of the Gang of Eight bill will almost certainly
pronounce the border more secure than it has ever been; such rhetoric is a
staple of such debates. But the situation on the border remains troublesome,
and if the American economy continues to improve, as everyone hopes it does,
the problem could become worse.

Schumer
is probably right. In coming years, "lots of millions" will seek to
come to the U.S. illegally unless something is done.

Byron
York, The Washington Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted
at byork@washingtonexaminer.com.
His column appears on Tuesday and Friday at washingtonexaminer.com.

*

Non-deportation rate drops — to 99.2 percent

The
Homeland Security Department has granted legal status to 99.2 percent of all
illegal immigrants who have applied under President Obama's new non-deportation
policy for young adults, according to the latest numbers released Friday.

"We could cut unemployment
in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said
Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs
Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on
immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal
immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce
immigration laws." REP. LAMAR SMITH – OUR NEXT PRESIDENT!

THE DEMOCRATS’ AMNESTY HOAX: DESTRUCTION OF THE GOP,
THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS AND 40 MILLION “UNREGISTERED DEMS” VOTING FOR MORE LA
RAZA SUPREMACY AND LOOTING OF AMERICA.

"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer
funds for services to non-citizens --- was the last gasp of white America in
California." --- Art
Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA RAZA
SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack Obama and LA RAZA.

A
week later, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said the immigration bill was “far worse”
than ObamaCare: He described the bill as an attempt by Senate Democrats “to
establish another monolithic voting bloc” among Hispanic Americans.

The
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration released a report last week
indicating that Internal Revenue Service (IRS) managers discouraged their
employees from detecting illegal alien tax fraud.

North Carolinians For Immigration Reform and Enforcement (NCFIRE) tells us that
the Association of Mexicans in North Carolina (AMEXCAN) and the consulate
general of Mexico will hold an event on August 6th and 7th at the Greenville
Convention Center to sell passports, Matricula Consular ID cards, and birth
registrations for children born in the United States. It is interesting to note
that a U.S. voter registration drive also will held.

Obama Doesn’t Distinguish Between Legal/Illegal
Immigration in Speech to Hispanics

Friday, May 13, 2011
By Penny Starr

President Barack Obama speaks at the
National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast in Washington, Thursday, May 12, 2011. (AP
Photo/Charles Dharapak)

(CNSNews.com) – In his speech at the National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast
on Thursday, President Barack Obama did not make a distinction between legal
and illegal immigration and compared illegal aliens to those people who
immigrated legally to the United States through Ellis Island or other U.S.
ports of entry.

In his speech, Obama referred to
"immigrants" six times and "immigration" seven times and
said the United States is a "nation of laws." But he did not use the
words “legal” or “illegal” in his speech
[2].

“It can be tempting to think that
those coming to America today are somehow different from us,” Obama
said. “And we need to not have amnesia about how we populated this
country.”

White
House loosens border rules for 2012 elections

The Daily Caller

06/20/2011
President Barack Obama’s administration is quietly offering a quasi-amnesty for
hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants aiming to win reelection by
mobilizing a wave of new Hispanic voters without alienating the populous at
large, say supporters of stronger immigration law enforcement.

“We think it is an excellent step,” said Laura Vasquez, at the
Hispanic-advocacy group, La Raza,
which pushed for the policies, and which
is working with other groups to register Hispanics to vote in 2012. “What’s
very important is how the prosecutorial discretion memo is implemented” on the
streets, she said.

“They
promised back taxes — but the requirement isn’t there; they promised tight
restrictions on welfare benefits — but state and local benefits, as well as tax
credits, will be available immediately and federal welfare access is granted to
millions of illegal immigrants starting in five years; they promised to protect
workers — but this bill would devastate workers by tripling the number of legal
immigrants over the next decade and doubling the number of guest workers,”
Sessions said.

Illegals cheat, distribute drugs,
lie, forge documents, steal and kill as if it’s a normal way of life. For them,
it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically opposed to America’s culture.

The legal age of sexual
consent in Mexico is 12 years old. Sex with children at this age and younger is
socially acceptable in Mexico. For example: A Mexican Lopez-Mendez pleaded
guilty to sexual assault on a 10 year old girl in West Virginia.

*

EVERYDAY THERE ARE 12
AMERICANS MURDERED and EIGHT CHILDREN MOLESTED BY ILLEGALS FROM MEXICO. WHERE’S
THE OUTRAGE?

RE mexican & his child porn

we already know Obama released
thousands of Mexican criminals under sequester, and has under any device he and
la raza janet can devise…. here’s another one

ANOTHER MEXICAN GANG RAPE of A CHILD
TODAY IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED CA… really want more of Obama’s OPEN BORDERS
agenda???

After she refused sex with her attackers,
authorities say she was raped, robbed and beaten unconscious in a sustained
sexual assault that some investigators called the worst they had ever seen.
Though as many as two dozen people stood and watched, the attack ended when a
woman in the neighborhood heard what was happening and called 911.

The feds have charged nine owners of 7-Eleven franchises with hiring illegal immigrants to work long hours in their eastern Long Island stores and cheating them out of hourly wages under threat of deportation, officials said Monday. The probe is being expanded to examine 40 franchises nationwide, including 25 in New York City and Long Island.

“They promised back taxes — but the requirement
isn’t there; they promised tight restrictions on welfare benefits — but state
and local benefits, as well as tax credits, will be available immediately and
federal welfare access is granted to millions of illegal immigrants starting in
five years; they promised to protect workers — but this bill would devastate
workers by tripling the number of legal immigrants over the next decade and
doubling the number of guest workers,” Sessions said.

"We could cut
unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal
workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the
American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help
citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than
fail to enforce immigration laws." REP. LAMAR SMITH – OUR NEXT PRESIDENT!

HOW BARACK OBAMA DESTROYED THE GOP and AMERICA WITH
BLANKET AMNESTY, NON-ENFORCEMENT, NO E-VERIFY and SABOTAGE OF AMERICAN BORDER
SECURITY and STATES ATTEMPT TO CURB ILLEGALS FROM VOTING…

A
week later, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) said the immigration bill was “far worse”
than ObamaCare: He described the bill as an attempt by Senate Democrats “to establish
another monolithic voting bloc” among Hispanic Americans.

“They promised back taxes — but the requirement
isn’t there; they promised tight restrictions on welfare benefits — but state
and local benefits, as well as tax credits, will be available immediately and
federal welfare access is granted to millions of illegal immigrants starting in
five years; they promised to protect workers — but this bill would devastate
workers by tripling the number of legal immigrants over the next decade and
doubling the number of guest workers,” Sessions said.

AMNESTY… here come 40 million heavy
breeding, dem voting looters!

The danger, as Washington Post
economics columnist Robert Samuelson argues, is that of “importing poverty” in the
form of a new underclass—a permanent group of working poor.

*

THE AMNESTY HOAX:

Sessions: Gang of Eight amendments should be viewed
with ‘great skepticism’

By Ramsey Cox -
06/17/13 10:28 AM ET

Sen. Jeff Sessions
(R-Ala.) warned the public Sunday, that they should view the Gang of Eight’s
immigration bill and amendments with “great skepticism” since the promise of
border enforcement before legalization isn't met in the bill.

“When the Gang of Eight first announced their
immigration bill they declared it was the toughest enforcement plan in history.
They declared enforcement would come before legalization,” Sessions said. “Now the bill has been reviewed and
there can be no dispute: it weakens current law, undermines future enforcement
and puts amnesty — not enforcement — first.

“So new promises of amendment ‘fixes’ to save the
bill should be viewed with great skepticism: every time, on every issue, the
promises have not matched with reality.”

Sessions said it was time for the Gang of Eight to
“start being straight with the American public” and that “no small cosmetic
fix” would save the bill. His comments come the week the Senate is expected to
dive into heavy amendment work to the Border Security, Economic Opportunity,
and Immigration Modernization Act.

The bipartisan group of eight senators, known as the
Gang of Eight, introduced S. 744, which would create a pathway to citizenship
for illegal immigrants already in the country, toughen border security, create
a guest worker program and boost high-skilled immigration.

Some Republicans have complained that
the legislation would provide amnesty in 10-13 years for the nearly 11 million
undocumented residents before strengthening border enforcement.

Those supporting the bill say it doesn’t include
amnesty since undocumented people would be forced to undergo a background
check, pay a fine and back taxes, learn English, and wait in line for a green
card. The bill also appropriates an additional $6.5 billion for border
enforcement measures.

Sessions argued those things are not
actually in the bill, though he has also said that because the legislation is
nearly 1,000 pages it is hard to read and understand it all.

“They promised back taxes — but the requirement
isn’t there; they promised tight restrictions on welfare benefits — but state
and local benefits, as well as tax credits, will be available immediately and
federal welfare access is granted to millions of illegal immigrants starting in
five years; they promised to protect workers — but this bill would devastate
workers by tripling the number of legal immigrants over the next decade and
doubling the number of guest workers,” Sessions said.

The bill makes permanent legal residence contingent
on the Department of Homeland Security having 100 percent situational awareness
at every segment of the Southern border and a 90 percent apprehension rate of
those illegally crossing. But Sessions said the bill gives DHS too much say
over whether the border is secure, leaving Congress powerless to stop the
amnesty program if security measures aren’t met.

“I’m afraid we’ll have a
deal like in 1986 where the amnesty provisions become law and the enforcement
doesn’t occur,” Sessions said Wednesday on the Senate floor. “We don’t have the
kind of commitment to law enforcement at this point that gives the American
people the confidence that we’re moving on the right path. So this is no sure
thing.”

This is the unadulterated voice of finance capital
speaking. It should be recalled that JPMorgan is deeply implicated in the
speculative operations that have devastated the lives of hundreds of millions
of workers around the world. In March of this year, a US Senate committee
released a 300-page report documenting the criminal practices and fraud carried
out by JPMorgan, the largest bank in the US and the world’s biggest dealer in
derivatives. Despite the detailed revelations in the report, no action will be
taken against the bank’s CEO, Jamie who enjoys the personal confidence of the
US president.

This is the unadulterated voice of finance capital
speaking. It should be recalled that JPMorgan is deeply implicated in the
speculative operations that have devastated the lives of hundreds of millions
of workers around the world. In March of this year, a US Senate committee
released a 300-page report documenting the criminal practices and fraud carried
out by JPMorgan, the largest bank in the US and the world’s biggest dealer in
derivatives. Despite the detailed revelations in the report, no action will be
taken against the bank’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, who enjoys the personal confidence
of the US president.

THE LONG HISTORY of BARACK OBAMA and HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS
JP MORGAN… STILL LOOTING AMERICA AND THE WORLD!

This is the unadulterated voice of finance capital
speaking. It should be recalled that JPMorgan is deeply implicated in the
speculative operations that have devastated the lives of hundreds of millions
of workers around the world. In March of this year, a US Senate committee
released a 300-page report documenting the criminal practices and fraud carried
out by JPMorgan, the largest bank in the US and the world’s biggest dealer in
derivatives. Despite the detailed revelations in the report, no action will be
taken against the bank’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, who enjoys the personal confidence
of the US president.

First, the paper argues, financial measures are necessary
to ensure that major investment houses such as JP Morgan can continue to reap
huge profits from their speculative activities in Europe. Second, the authors
maintain, it is necessary to impose “political reforms” aimed at suppressing
opposition to the massively unpopular austerity measures being carried out at
the behest of the banks.

Published by the International Committee
of the Fourth International (ICFI)

JPMorgan calls for authoritarian regimes in Europe

By Stefan Steinberg
17 June 2013

In a document released
at the end of May, the American banking and investment giant JP Morgan Chase
calls for the overturning of the bourgeois democratic constitutions established
in a series of European countries after the Second World War and the
installation of authoritarian regimes.

The 16-page document
was produced by the Europe Economic Research group of JP Morgan and titled “The
Euro Area Adjustment—About Half-Way There.” The document begins by noting that
the crisis in the euro zone has two dimensions.

First, the paper argues, financial measures are necessary
to ensure that major investment houses such as JP Morgan can continue to reap
huge profits from their speculative activities in Europe. Second, the authors
maintain, it is necessary to impose “political reforms” aimed at suppressing
opposition to the massively unpopular austerity measures being carried out at
the behest of the banks.

The report expresses
satisfaction with the implementation of a number of financial mechanisms by the
European Union to secure banking interests. In this respect, the study
maintains, reform of the euro area is about halfway there. The report does,
however, call for more action by the European Central Bank (ECB).

Since the eruption of
the global financial crisis in 2008, the ECB has made trillions of euros
available to the banks to enable them to wipe out their bad debts and commence
a new round of speculation. In the face of mounting pressure from the financial
markets, ECB chief Mario Draghi declared last summer that he would do whatever
was necessary to shore up the banks.

This, however, is not
sufficient as far as the analysts at JPMorgan are concerned. They demand a
“more dramatic response” to the crisis from the ECB.

The harshest
criticisms in the document, however, are reserved for national governments that
have been much too tardy in implementing the type of authoritarian measures
necessary to impose austerity. The process of such “political reform,” the
study notes, has “hardly even begun.”

Towards the end of
the document, the authors explain what they mean by “political reform.” They
write: “In the early days of the crisis it was thought that these national
legacy problems were largely economic,” but “it has become apparent that there
are deep-seated political problems in the periphery, which, in our view, need
to change if EMU (the European Monetary Union) is to function in the long run.”

The paper then
details problems in the political systems of the peripheral countries of the
European Union—Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy—that have been at the center
of the European debt crisis.

The authors write:
“The political systems in the periphery were established in the aftermath of
dictatorship, and were defined by that experience. Constitutions tend to show a
strong socialist influence, reflecting the political strength that left-wing
parties gained after the defeat of fascism.

“Political systems
around the periphery typically display several of the following features: weak
executives; weak central states relative to regions; constitutional protection
of labour rights; consensus-building systems which foster political
clientalism; and the right to protest if unwelcome changes are made to the
political status quo. The shortcomings of this political legacy have been
revealed by the crisis. “ Whatever the historical inaccuracies in their
analysis, there can not be the slightest doubt that the authors of the JPMorgan
report are arguing for governments to adopt dictatorial-type powers to complete
the process of social counterrevolution that is already well underway across
Europe.

In reality, there was
nothing genuinely socialist about the constitutions established across Europe
in the postwar period. Such constitutions were aimed at securing bourgeois rule
under conditions where the capitalist system and its political agents had been
thoroughly compromised by the crimes of Fascist and dictatorial regimes.

The constitutions of
European states, including those of Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal, were
elaborated and implemented in collaboration with the country’s respective
Socialist and Communist parties, which played the key role in demobilising the
working class and permitting the bourgeoisie to maintain its rule.

At the same time,
however, Europe’s discredited ruling classes were well aware that the Russian
Revolution remained a political beacon for many workers. They felt compelled to
make a series of concessions to the working class to prevent revolution—in the
form of precisely the social and constitutional protections, including the right
to protest, that JPMorgan would now like to see abolished.

To some extent, the
bank’s criticism of European governments for their lack of authoritarianism
rings hollow. Across Europe, governments have repeatedly resorted in recent
years to police state measures to suppress opposition to their policies.

In France, Spain and
Greece, emergency decrees and the military have been used to break strikes. The
constitution adopted in Greece in 1975, following the fall of the colonels’
dictatorship, has not prevented the Greek government from sacking public
workers en masse. And in a number of European countries, ruling parties are
encouraging the growth of neofascist parties such as the Golden Dawn movement
in Greece.

For JPMorgan, however, this is not enough. In order to
avoid social revolution in the coming period, its analysts warn, it is
necessary for capitalist governments across Europe to move as quickly as
possible to set up dictatorial forms of rule.

At the end of the
document, the authors put forward a series of scenarios that they claim could
result from the failure of European governments to erect authoritarian systems.
These variants include: “1) the collapse of several reform-minded governments
in the European south, 2) a collapse in support for the euro or the EU, 3) an
outright electoral victory for radical anti-European parties somewhere in the
region, or 4) the effective ungovernability of some Member States once social
costs (particularly unemployment) pass a particular level.”

This is the unadulterated voice of finance capital
speaking. It should be recalled that JPMorgan is deeply implicated in the
speculative operations that have devastated the lives of hundreds of millions
of workers around the world. In March of this year, a US Senate committee
released a 300-page report documenting the criminal practices and fraud carried
out by JPMorgan, the largest bank in the US and the world’s biggest dealer in
derivatives. Despite the detailed revelations in the report, no action will be
taken against the bank’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, who enjoys the personal confidence
of the US president.

The same bank now
presumes to lecture governments. Seventy years after the assumption of power by
Hitler and the Nazis in Germany, with catastrophic consequences for Europe and
the world, JPMorgan is leading the call for authoritarian measures to suppress
the working class and wipe out its social gains.

*

“I’m not here to punish banks!” President Barack Obama… no
president in history has taken so much dirty money from banks than Barack
Obama. No administration in history has been so infested with Bankster-connected
white collar criminals!

THE
LOOTING OF OBAMA’S PALS AT JP MORGAN.

HOLDER IS TOO BUSY HISPANDERING FOR LA RAZA,
SUING AMERICAN STATES AND SABOTAGING OUR LAWS AND BORDERS SO THE OBAMANATION
CAN BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.

“Records show
that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial
industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase
($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”