At 22 Jan 2004 19:13:23 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Oh, I misunderstood your proposal here. I'm happy to have a default
> argument the way the current I/O functions work, though I do prefer an
> explict argument.
Sorry, I was overly brief, I considered this implied by the "and" when I
wrote "and/or":
And/or use an implicit (current-locale) as in my response on c.l.s.
--
Alex