The object of this blog began as a display of a varied amount of writings, scribblings and rantings that can be easily analysed by technology today to present the users with a clearer picture of the state of their minds, based on tests run on their input and their uses of the technology we are advocating with www.projectbrainsaver.com

European Parliamentarians call on President Obama to free Bradley Manning

Pfc. Bradley Manning (photo credit: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Open Letter from Members of the European Parliament
to President Barack Obama and US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel

As Members of the European Parliament, who were elected to represent our constituents throughout Europe, we are writing to express our concerns about the ongoing persecution of Bradley Manning, the young U.S. soldier who released classified information revealing evidence of human rights abuses and apparent war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The U.S. Army has charged Private First Class Manning with 21 different crimes, including ‘Aiding the Enemy’; a capital charge. To convict a person who leaked information to the media of “Aiding the Enemy” would set a terrible precedent. Although we understand the US government is not seeking the death penalty for Bradley Manning, there would be nothing to stop this from happening in future cases. As it is, PFC Manning faces the possibility of life in prison without parole, recently rejected as “inhuman and degrading treatment” by the European Court of Human Rights.

On July 2nd , Army prosecutors closed their arguments in the case without having provided any real evidence that Bradley Manning aided the enemy, or that he intended to do so. In his defense against those charges to which he pleaded not guilty, PFC Manning was not permitted to bring any evidence of motivation. And in a statement calling on the court to allow a ‘public interest’ defense, Amnesty International said that this was ‘disturbing…as he has said he reasonably believed he was exposing human rights and humanitarian law violations. Moreover, the prosecution provided no evidence that PFC Manning caused harm to U.S. national security or to US and NATO troops.

We agree with Amnesty International that the U.S. government should immediately drop the most serious charges against PFC Bradley Manning, and that to charge Bradley Manning with ‘aiding the enemy’ is ‘ludicrous’ – a ‘travesty of justice’ which ‘makes a mockery of the US military court system’.

“We’ve now seen the evidence presented by both sides, and it’s abundantly clear that the charge of ‘aiding the enemy’ has no basis,” said Widney Brown, Senior Director for International Law and Policy at Amnesty International. “The prosecution should also take a long, hard look at its entire case and move to drop all other charges that aren’t supported by the evidence presented.”

Rather than causing harm, Bradley Manning’s release to WikiLeaks of the Iraq War Logs and the Afghan War Diaries shone much needed light on those occupations, revealing, amongst other abuses, the routine killing of civilians. The bleak picture painted by these war diaries contrasts greatly with the rosy progress reports being provided to the public by military and political leaders. PFC Manning has said he felt that if the American public had access to this information, this could ‘spark a domestic debate’ on American foreign policy ‘as it related to Iraq and Afghanistan’. Far from being a traitor, Bradley Manning had the best interests of his country in mind.

The Iraqi people continue to suffer the consequences of this war, even after the withdrawal of foreign troops, with millions of homeless refugees and the resumption of sectarian violence. Meanwhile, eleven and a half years after the U.S invaded Afghanistan, that nation has yet to form a functioning democracy or to free itself from the Taliban and fundamentalist warlords.

Bradley Manning: ‘I felt that we were risking so much for people that seemed unwilling to co-operate with us, leading to frustration and anger on both sides. I began to become depressed with the situation that we found ourselves increasingly mired in year after year.’

Bradley Manning was witness to the wrongdoing of the U.S. military. He says this ‘troubled’ and ‘disturbed’ him. But instead of ‘passing by on the other side’ like so many others, he acted in accordance with international law and with a strong commitment to truth, transparency and democracy. He wrote at the time that he hoped his actions would lead to “worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms.”

Bradley Manning also released information about the men who continue to be wrongly held in indefinite detention at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo, Cuba. Over one hundred of these prisoners have been carrying out a long, indefinite hunger strike, and 45 of them are being force-fed by U.S. soldiers. This intolerable situation continues to undermine U.S. claims to promote freedom and democracy, compromising the standing of the US in the world and diminishing US moral authority.

Bradley Manning’s courageous action, for which he has three times been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, was an inspiration to others, including Edward Snowden, who recently revealed massive U.S. government surveillance in the U.S. and also against European governments and citizens.

We are concerned that the U.S. administration’s war on whistleblowers such as Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning is a deterrent to the process of democracy in both the United States and Europe.

We hereby urge you to end the persecution of Bradley Manning, a young gay man who has been imprisoned for over three years, including ten months in solitary confinement, under conditions that the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan Mendez deemed “cruel and abusive.” Bradley Manning has already suffered too much, and he should be freed as soon as humanly possible.

Signed,

Marisa Matias, Member of the European Parliament, PortugalChristian Engström, Member of the European Parliament, SwedenAna Maria Gomes, Member of the European Parliament, Portugal

Gabi Zimmer, Member of the European Parliament, Germany Paul Murphy, Member of the European Parliament, Ireland

Sabine Wils, Member of the European Parliament, Germany

Jacky Henin, Member of the European Parliament, FranceAlda Sousa, Member of the European Parliament, PortugalMartina Anderson, Member of the European Parliament, IrelandNikola Vuljanić, Member of the European Parliament, KroatiaSabine Lösing, Member of the European Parliament, GermanyLothar Bisky, Member of the European Parliament, GermanyHelmut Scholz, Member of the European Parliament, Germany

Kevin SlocombeCWU- Communication Workers' Union (UK) Reacting to news that Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells received a 37% increase in her take home pay last year (up from £510,000 to £697,000), CWU accuses the company of gross double standards and of ripping off staff and customers in favour of exorbitant executive pay. More details to follow on Monday but read the union's initial response in full here: http://www.cwu.org/news/archive/reaction-to-post-office-annual-report.html

Kevin SlocombeCWU- Communication Workers' Union (UK) Reacting to news that Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells received a 37% increase in her take home pay last year (up from £510,000 to £697,000), CWU accuses the company of gross double standards and of ripping off staff and customers in favour of exorbitant executive pay. More details to follow on Monday but read the union's initial response in full here: http://www.cwu.org/news/archive/reaction-to-post-office-annual-report.html

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/eddie-kidd-wife-samantha-jailed-2113398 How sad. I photographed Eddie in North Wooton, near King's Lynn in Norfolk, UK in the late 70's. Before the show he hurt his wrist(?) and I seem to remember getting him to hospital and back so he could do the show, which he did.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/eddie-kidd-wife-samantha-jailed-2113398 How sad. I photographed Eddie in North Wooton, near King's Lynn in Norfolk, UK in the late 70's. Before the show he hurt his wrist(?) and I seem to remember getting him to hospital and back so he could do the show, which he did.

Kiri Campbell It look like the NZ Police are going to try and keep Kiri until Friday to appear in New Plymouth or Wellington Court House. Any support, donations and food packages will help immensely at this critical time. Can you help Kiri's family while she fights for you and me? http://199.85.215.243/help_her_family.htm

Kiri Campbell It look like the NZ Police are going to try and keep Kiri until Friday to appear in New Plymouth or Wellington Court House. Any support, donations and food packages will help immensely at this critical time. Can you help Kiri's family while she fights for you and me? http://199.85.215.243/help_her_family.htm

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

Kiri CampbellFREE KIRI CAMPBELL Free 'KIRI the KIWI - whats this about? It is my understanding that we all have a 'trust fund' which is linked to our 'bonded title' being our 'Certificate of live birth' - each of us is worth millions, which is calculated from estimated revenue we will generate in our working lives coupled with the 'common wealth' - the resources of our nation. Kiri Campbell used the legal method guided by the Mary Croft process described in her book "HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN" which is available FREE online - http://www.thecrowhouse.com/Documents/mary-book.pdf Page 15 in the document is where it really hits off, exposing that banks loan off your signature without putting themselves in danger, it is merely 'credits' - numbers on a computer somewhere that have no consequence if not paid to the banks. However, Mary Croft encourages readers to call their bluff, by utilising CONTRACT LAW to deal with them with 'transaction instruments'. In her case a cheque from a closed account. To better understand will take anyone a fair amount of research, and re-education of what it truly means to 'engage in commerce'. Kiri has rattled the cage of the establishment by putting her neck out and attempting this manoever in NZ, and ended up in jail which is perhaps caused by 1 of 2 reasons. (1) She has made an error in the execution of the filings and/or transaction instrument. (2) She perfected the claim, and the system is desperate to cut her down to size for fear that the wider population may catch on and follow her example. After hours of research on this topic, I would say its more likely the second reason. She has another court appearance TBA to discuss bail. In the meantime I hope everyone will take an interest in this case and show Kiri Campbell support. FREE KIRI CAMPBELL is a FB page dedicated to this present matter of her detention. Drufi

Kiri CampbellFREE KIRI CAMPBELL Free 'KIRI the KIWI - whats this about? It is my understanding that we all have a 'trust fund' which is linked to our 'bonded title' being our 'Certificate of live birth' - each of us is worth millions, which is calculated from estimated revenue we will generate in our working lives coupled with the 'common wealth' - the resources of our nation. Kiri Campbell used the legal method guided by the Mary Croft process described in her book "HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN" which is available FREE online - http://www.thecrowhouse.com/Documents/mary-book.pdf Page 15 in the document is where it really hits off, exposing that banks loan off your signature without putting themselves in danger, it is merely 'credits' - numbers on a computer somewhere that have no consequence if not paid to the banks. However, Mary Croft encourages readers to call their bluff, by utilising CONTRACT LAW to deal with them with 'transaction instruments'. In her case a cheque from a closed account. To better understand will take anyone a fair amount of research, and re-education of what it truly means to 'engage in commerce'. Kiri has rattled the cage of the establishment by putting her neck out and attempting this manoever in NZ, and ended up in jail which is perhaps caused by 1 of 2 reasons. (1) She has made an error in the execution of the filings and/or transaction instrument. (2) She perfected the claim, and the system is desperate to cut her down to size for fear that the wider population may catch on and follow her example. After hours of research on this topic, I would say its more likely the second reason. She has another court appearance TBA to discuss bail. In the meantime I hope everyone will take an interest in this case and show Kiri Campbell support. FREE KIRI CAMPBELL is a FB page dedicated to this present matter of her detention. Drufi

Kiri Campbell ADMINISTRATION OF THE FREE KIRI CAMPBELL PAGE: Please be informed that a wonderful team of my supporters are managing my private and FREE KIRI CAMPBELL Page. I am still in custody against my will, without my consent, being held in various police facilities. Please come to the New Plymouth Court House Friday 2.8.13 9am and support THE TRUTH. Thank you all xxx Great Love to you all xxx

Kiri Campbell ADMINISTRATION OF THE FREE KIRI CAMPBELL PAGE: Please be informed that a wonderful team of my supporters are managing my private and FREE KIRI CAMPBELL Page. I am still in custody against my will, without my consent, being held in various police facilities. Please come to the New Plymouth Court House Friday 2.8.13 9am and support THE TRUTH. Thank you all xxx Great Love to you all xxx

Drew Finlay 2 hours ago Free 'Kiri the kiwi' - whats this about? It is my understanding that we all have a 'trust fund' which is linked to our 'bonded title' being our 'Certificate of live birth' - each of us is worth millions, which is calculated from estimated revenue we will generate in our working lives coupled with the 'common wealth' - the resources of our nation. Kiri Campbell used the legal method guided by the Mary Croft process described in her book "HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN" which is available FREE online - http://www.thecrowhouse.com/Documents/mary-book.pdf Page 15 in the document is where it really hits off, exposing that banks loan off your signature without putting themselves in danger, it is merely 'credits' - numbers on a computer somewhere that have no consequence if not paid to the banks. However, Mary Croft encourages readers to call their bluff, by utilising CONTRACT LAW to deal with them with 'transaction instruments'. In her case a cheque from a closed account. To better understand will take anyone a fair amount of research, and re-education of what it truly means to 'engage in commerce'. Kiri has rattled the cage of the establishment by putting her neck out and attempting this manoever in NZ, and ended up in jail which is perhaps caused by 1 of 2 reasons. (1) She has made an error in the execution of the filings and/or transaction instrument. (2) She perfected the claim, and the system is desperate to cut her down to size for fear that the wider population may catch on and follow her example. After hours of research on this topic, I would say its more likely the second reason. She has another court appearance TBA to discuss bail. In the meantime I hope everyone will take an interest in this case and show Kiri Campbell support. FREE KIRI CAMPBELL is a FB page dedicated to this present matter of her detention. Drufi

Drew Finlay 2 hours ago Free 'Kiri the kiwi' - whats this about? It is my understanding that we all have a 'trust fund' which is linked to our 'bonded title' being our 'Certificate of live birth' - each of us is worth millions, which is calculated from estimated revenue we will generate in our working lives coupled with the 'common wealth' - the resources of our nation. Kiri Campbell used the legal method guided by the Mary Croft process described in her book "HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN" which is available FREE online - http://www.thecrowhouse.com/Documents/mary-book.pdf Page 15 in the document is where it really hits off, exposing that banks loan off your signature without putting themselves in danger, it is merely 'credits' - numbers on a computer somewhere that have no consequence if not paid to the banks. However, Mary Croft encourages readers to call their bluff, by utilising CONTRACT LAW to deal with them with 'transaction instruments'. In her case a cheque from a closed account. To better understand will take anyone a fair amount of research, and re-education of what it truly means to 'engage in commerce'. Kiri has rattled the cage of the establishment by putting her neck out and attempting this manoever in NZ, and ended up in jail which is perhaps caused by 1 of 2 reasons. (1) She has made an error in the execution of the filings and/or transaction instrument. (2) She perfected the claim, and the system is desperate to cut her down to size for fear that the wider population may catch on and follow her example. After hours of research on this topic, I would say its more likely the second reason. She has another court appearance TBA to discuss bail. In the meantime I hope everyone will take an interest in this case and show Kiri Campbell support. FREE KIRI CAMPBELL is a FB page dedicated to this present matter of her detention. Drufi

Bradley Manning case shows that US government's priorities are 'upside down' https://www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?NewsID=20904 Posted: 30 July 2013 ‘It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you’ - Widney Brown Despite an acquittal on the most serious “aiding the enemy” charge against him, today’s verdict against the US Private Bradley Manning reveals the US government’s misplaced priorities on national security, said Amnesty International this evening. Amnesty International’s Senior Director of International Law and Policy Widney Brown said: “The government’s priorities are upside down. The US government has refused to investigate credible allegations of torture and other crimes under international law despite overwhelming evidence. “Yet they decided to prosecute Manning who it seems was trying to do the right thing - reveal credible evidence of unlawful behaviour by the government. You investigate and prosecute those who destroy the credibility of the government by engaging in acts such as torture which are prohibited under the US Constitution and in international law. “The government’s pursuit of the ‘aiding the enemy’ charge was a serious overreach of the law, not least because there was no credible evidence of Manning’s intent to harm the USA by releasing classified information to WikiLeaks. “Since the attacks of September 11, we have seen the US government use the issue of national security to defend a whole range of actions that are unlawful under international and domestic law. “It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you, no holds barred, if you're thinking of revealing evidence of its unlawful behaviour.” The court martial today found Manning guilty of a range of additional charges, including ten lesser charges relating to misuse of classified information to which he had already pleaded guilty. Amnesty insisted that any sentence imposed for the other charges must take into account information relating to Manning’s reasonable belief that he was exposing serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. Amnesty believes it undermines accountability when the US government is so selective about who it chooses to investigate and prosecute. This is particularly true when they seem intent on punishing those who reveal unlawful government behaviour and protecting those who actually engaged in or ordered such behaviour. The hundreds of thousands of documents Manning released to WikiLeaks included videos and dossiers that pointed to potential human rights violations - including breaches of international humanitarian law - by US troops abroad and the CIA closer to home. Earlier this month Amnesty described the judge’s decision not to drop the charge accusing Manning of “aiding the enemy” as ludicrous and as a decision which “makes a mockery of the US military court system”.

Bradley Manning case shows that US government's priorities are 'upside down' https://www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?NewsID=20904 Posted: 30 July 2013 ‘It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you’ - Widney Brown Despite an acquittal on the most serious “aiding the enemy” charge against him, today’s verdict against the US Private Bradley Manning reveals the US government’s misplaced priorities on national security, said Amnesty International this evening. Amnesty International’s Senior Director of International Law and Policy Widney Brown said: “The government’s priorities are upside down. The US government has refused to investigate credible allegations of torture and other crimes under international law despite overwhelming evidence. “Yet they decided to prosecute Manning who it seems was trying to do the right thing - reveal credible evidence of unlawful behaviour by the government. You investigate and prosecute those who destroy the credibility of the government by engaging in acts such as torture which are prohibited under the US Constitution and in international law. “The government’s pursuit of the ‘aiding the enemy’ charge was a serious overreach of the law, not least because there was no credible evidence of Manning’s intent to harm the USA by releasing classified information to WikiLeaks. “Since the attacks of September 11, we have seen the US government use the issue of national security to defend a whole range of actions that are unlawful under international and domestic law. “It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that Manning's trial was about sending a message: the US government will come after you, no holds barred, if you're thinking of revealing evidence of its unlawful behaviour.” The court martial today found Manning guilty of a range of additional charges, including ten lesser charges relating to misuse of classified information to which he had already pleaded guilty. Amnesty insisted that any sentence imposed for the other charges must take into account information relating to Manning’s reasonable belief that he was exposing serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. Amnesty believes it undermines accountability when the US government is so selective about who it chooses to investigate and prosecute. This is particularly true when they seem intent on punishing those who reveal unlawful government behaviour and protecting those who actually engaged in or ordered such behaviour. The hundreds of thousands of documents Manning released to WikiLeaks included videos and dossiers that pointed to potential human rights violations - including breaches of international humanitarian law - by US troops abroad and the CIA closer to home. Earlier this month Amnesty described the judge’s decision not to drop the charge accusing Manning of “aiding the enemy” as ludicrous and as a decision which “makes a mockery of the US military court system”.

Amber Lyon NSA Surveillance Programs To Be Partially Declassified The US government will declassify documents about the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs in a “deliberate” attempt to provide the public with additional information after whistleblower Edward Snowden first revealed NSA spy tactics. A senior US official told CNN about the US intelligence community’s intended plans to declassify information, and said the documents could become available as early as this week.

Amber Lyon NSA Surveillance Programs To Be Partially Declassified The US government will declassify documents about the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs in a “deliberate” attempt to provide the public with additional information after whistleblower Edward Snowden first revealed NSA spy tactics. A senior US official told CNN about the US intelligence community’s intended plans to declassify information, and said the documents could become available as early as this week.

"Jorgenson encountered so much resistance from the US military making his film that he says he’s convinced one “high-placed government source” was telling the truth when he said, “It’s not that the Vietnamese won’t let him (Robertson) go; it’s that our government doesn’t want him.”"

"Jorgenson encountered so much resistance from the US military making his film that he says he’s convinced one “high-placed government source” was telling the truth when he said, “It’s not that the Vietnamese won’t let him (Robertson) go; it’s that our government doesn’t want him.”"

https://one.ubuntu.com/referrals/referee/2419244/ Get more storage free!Read More about using referrals Spread the word and get rewarded by inviting all your friends and family to Ubuntu One. For each person you refer both of you will get 500 MB extra storage if they sign up via this link:

https://one.ubuntu.com/referrals/referee/2419244/ Get more storage free!Read More about using referrals Spread the word and get rewarded by inviting all your friends and family to Ubuntu One. For each person you refer both of you will get 500 MB extra storage if they sign up via this link:

I added a few notes thanks to the guys over at the Stillness in the Storm blog ~BK

Anyone who has been following this breaking story has been on pins and needles to find out what happened to Kiri in court today. Well, let’s just say the hosts of The One People show tonight were not expecting to hear from her live on the air to tell her story. All I can say is; unbelievable. Rare is the day we encounter a woman with the kind of courage and mental fortitude which Kiri so gracefully exhibited in court this morning. To be standing in front of a judge for charges of fraud only to leave an entire court house stunned and wondering what hit them is a feat most souls only dream about; but not Kiri. This brave woman was sent here as a walking illustration of what we can accomplish when we, “know who we are,” as she so eloquently puts it. There will be much more on this story in the days and weeks to come, so for now I share with you all the audio of tonight’s call along with the document she read inside the court house. I must warn you, the content you are about to read and hear is quite empowering. If you are not ready for this nuclear sized burst of energy, I suggest discontinuing this story now and go watch FOX News instead ~BK

“The courts have ruled that the ONLY authority held by the government is authority that was delegated by, “We the people”. The courts have also said that, “We the people” have all of the rights of the king. Therefore, we are all kings and queens”

BE IT KNOWN that all persons claiming professional association with the existing court system also including ministers, police, bailiffs, magistrates, judges, registrars and deputy registrars and other court officers and employees and all other agents and prosecutors (from now referred to as INOR,( in need of redemption) from varying other sources within the New Zealand company structure and substructure are herewith noticed to stop and to recuse themselves immediately in all and any further action and involvements and relating to their respective positions.

You could face charges in a common law court and in a trail by jury for treason or high treason for the past and present involvement in undue process of justice and perversion of justice by fraud, contempt, trespass, sedition and any unauthorized administration of Estates (or trusts) or persons without authority of delegation from any executor offices, abandonment of their oaths of office as public servants and for impersonation of positions held under your oaths taken when as a matter of fact being engaged in commercial, revenue generating enterprise contrary to the position supposed to have held.

We the people could agree to appoint a transitional chief administrator who could take over the keys or other means of access to the buildings to coordinate the conversion of the existing buildings and administration of record keeping back to their original purpose of administering real justice.

All records and all chattels would have to remain onsite and full access to the chief administrator or people appointed by the chief administrator would be provided from that day forward to commence a review and full audit of the previous court activities and level of involvement of all INOR in treasonous behavior and any other crime committed against the people.

BE IT KNOWN to all women and men that this land is a common law jurisdiction and that all lawful courts are common law courts where free men can exercise their inalienable right to trial by jury.

Is it not true that all court buildings are standing on the land of the people, the internal sovereign heads making up the one and only true crown, and being the land granted for the purpose of administering justice by the rule of law, and being land without certificate of title or sales and purchase agreement, which would define ownership? Is it not true that the original grant given to occupy the land the court building stands on was to facilitate justice as public service providers and as public servants and the servants to the people could one day be revoked by the internal sovereign heads, the people, who could authorise and execute a notice of this nature.

Is it not true that any officer of any court, and any government official also including New Zealand police who have attempted to compel or compelled one of “the people”, into their foreign corporate commercial jurisdiction by accusing them of being a “person” has perjured their oaths, and were engaging in TREASON, and SEDITION, and they have no immunity whatsoever, because all officers of all courts are presumed to know the law?

Is it not true that no government official who represents ANYTHING about NEW ZEALAND has any authority whatsoever over “the people”, and the minute he or she attempts to assert any such authority, he or she immediately perjures his oaths, engages in TREASON (breach of trust) and is engaged in SEDITION, because he or she is making war against the established government which is “the people”, and he or she immediately loses all immunity he or she might otherwise enjoy?

Is it not true that it is essential to the preservation of truth, justice and freedom to affirm oneself to the right to trial by jury and that any denial of this right by anyone constitutes treason against the man and woman standing on the land. No parliament (part of management committee) of the New Zealand company can legislate to abolish or diminish this right protecting life, liberty and property in a common law jurisdiction and have no standing as sovereign crown and never had such a standing as sovereignty was never ceded to the New Zealand company by the man and woman on the land?

Is it not true that it is the duty and responsibility of jurors only to judge the facts and law presented to them, so that they can administer Justice to all parties in any action?

Is it not true that unless a court obtained the clear, written, witnessed and unequivocal consent of all parties with full disclosure given and full understanding of definitions and interpretations of all words used, in plain English, and without duress applied or threats being made or tricked or deceived, to be without a jury? Is it not true that any court without such consent been given has and never had jurisdiction to proceed summarily and any such awards, doings and proceedings shall be held to be null and void and any cases (constructive trusts) to be corrected now and recorded accordingly including the release of all parties unlawfully charged and held, to be now released from any order which was given via a magistrate, adjudicator, judge, deputy registrar or registrar acting under the summary proceedings without such proof of claim of consent?

Is it not true that there cannot be any trust or confidence in the process INOR has engaged in and all persons involved hold full personal and commercial unlimited liabilities?

Perhaps very soon INOR will have to vacate the buildings and land and be recused from engagement from the presently existing court system?”

At the end of this interview it is not clear whether Kiri will be required to appear in Court again or what the final status of her 15,000,000 in value is. Updates will undoubtedly occur. Here is the narrative of her experience scribed from her own words:

Kiri’s name was called and she reasserted her position that she was not going to contract with anyone she did not know. The Court has not proved to Kiri who they are and where they get their authority.

Kiri stated that she rejected this offer and to contract because it was incomplete and asked the Court if there are any objections; the Court did not respond.

Kiri began executing a “NOTICE TO COURTS AND AGENTS” which was a statement written by her. This was a very powerful statement (Posted below). This was a notice she had used in the past which the Court may have been familiar with.

Kiri was told to “stand in silence.”

During the execution of the notice an officer walked up to her and said “shut up!”

Kiri ignored them and continued to execute the notice to completion.

Kiri said “the notice was received and accepted.”

Kiri was then “arrested” again or kidnapped from the Court house.

Kiri was accosted by 2 men and a women reporting to be police officers who never gave their real names.

As a result of reading the notice she was charged with “Breach of the Peace.”

Kiri was constantly being made “offers” to contract which she repeatedly refused by stating she did not consent to what was happening to her.

The 3 Police offers attempted to hand cuff Kiri and she alluded to the fact they were not able to.Kiri was forced into a vehicle and eventually handcuffed by “dislocating her thumb.” She was incarcerated again, searched to her “bare skin” chained to a wall and was covered in bruises because of the ordeal.Kiri was introduced to a Juris Solicitor that was going to broker some type of arrangement for her release; [more court fraud a slavery].

During the interview, Kiri kept having to make corrections to the statements her Solicitor was drafting. Obvious tampering was happening and Kiri rejected each draft eventually causing the Solicitor to leave, flustered. Kiri did not want her words to minced in any way, shape or fashion and rejected the Solicitors representation on her behalf.

Kiri was brought back in to Court and said “where do you want me, you are all dangerous and are armed, where do you want me?” She continued to state her non-consent and that she needed them to act in full disclosure.

Kiri asked the court to clarify “are you referring to my legal name or my given name.” [given name is for example, Justin of the House Deschamps]

The Court was outraged and kept trying to get Kiri to accept her PERSON. [JUSTIN DESCHAMPS - the corporate fiction]

The Court room was cleared of all people except the lawful jury of her peers; her representation.

The Court was not able to secure a contract with Kiri and she was moved to sign a police bail in another room.

Kiri read and amended the paper work to accurately reflect what happened, removing references to people and roles that did not exist; scratching out witness because there was no witness.

Kiri signed ‘under duress’ and ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE’ where ever it was required and try to leave wile they were attempting to force her into coming back for another hearing. She also wrote no contract on the documents.The Court finally produced an envelope with the words “full disclosure” written across them and stating Kiri had what she needed.

Kiri opened the envelope to reveal a “stack of documents” and in turn, still refused their offer to contract. Kiri walked back in to Court and wrote refused their final offer in writing one last time.

Kiri decides to go home and have Tea with her family.

TSB Bank Contacts Kiri

Kiri received a letter from TSB stating “please accepted this as proof your accounts are closed with TSB.”

TSB Bank enclosed a Photo Copy of the negotiable instrument (the check from a closed bank account in Kiri’s name) and check for ~ 1600 New Zealand Dollars. The copy came with a cover letter saying the accounts were “unsound.”

Kiri Intends to send the check back using a deposit slip to the TSB Bank, in addition to all the documents she received today from the courts with “no contract” stamped over the top of it.

Kiri had made a recording of the entire execution of Notice all the way up to her incarceration which hopefully will be online in the days ahead.

It is not clear at this time what can be done with TSB bank, however as a result of commercial remedies which Kiri can exercise she may be able to recover all of the value deposited, the 15,000,000 and damages.More information will be made available as time goes on.