End of Days Headlines

Main menu

Category HAARP/Chemtrails

Post navigation

Researchers have developed a new technique to cause rain and lighting by firing a laser at clouds.

The technique uses a ‘double laser’ to stimulate particles within a cloud.

The technique could one day be used to create rainstorms and even lighting on command, the researchers hope.

The researchers at the University of Central Florida’s College of Optics & Photonics and the University of Arizona developed a new technique to aim a high-energy laser beam into clouds to make it rain or trigger lightning.

They found the key was to surround the beam with a second beam to act as an energy reservoir, sustaining the central beam to greater distances than previously possible.

The secondary ‘dress’ beam refuels and helps prevent the dissipation of the high-intensity primary beam, which on its own would break down quickly.

A report on the project, ‘Externally refueled optical filaments,’ was recently published in Nature Photonics.

Water condensation and lightning activity in clouds are linked to large amounts of static charged particles.

Stimulating those particles with the right kind of laser holds the key to possibly one day summoning a shower when and where it is needed.

Lasers can already travel great distances but “when a laser beam becomes intense enough, it behaves differently than usual – it collapses inward on itself,’ said Matthew Mills, a graduate student in the Center for Research and Education in Optics and Lasers (CREOL).

‘The collapse becomes so intense that electrons in the air’s oxygen and nitrogen are ripped off creating plasma – basically a soup of electrons.’

At that point, the plasma immediately tries to spread the beam back out, causing a struggle between the spreading and collapsing of an ultra-short laser pulse.

This struggle is called filamentation, and creates a filament or ‘light string’ that only propagates for a while until the properties of air make the beam disperse.

‘Because a filament creates excited electrons in its wake as it moves, it artificially seeds the conditions necessary for rain and lightning to occur,’ Mills said.

Other researchers have caused ‘electrical events’ in clouds, but not lightning strikes.

The team is now developing a way to get close enough to direct the beam into the cloud without being blasted to smithereens by lightning.

‘What would be nice is to have a sneaky way which allows us to produce an arbitrary long ‘filament extension cable,’ the researchers say.

The technique could one day be used to create rainstorms and even lighting on command, the researchers hope. The technique uses a ‘double laser’ to stimulate particles within a cloud.

‘It turns out that if you wrap a large, low intensity, doughnut-like ‘dress’ beam around the filament and slowly move it inward, you can provide this arbitrary extension,’ Mills said.

‘Since we have control over the length of a filament with our method, one could seed the conditions needed for a rainstorm from afar.

‘Ultimately, you could artificially control the rain and lightning over a large expanse with such ideas.’

So far, Mills and fellow graduate student Ali Miri have been able to extend the pulse from 10 inches to about 7 feet. And they’re working to extend the filament even farther.

‘This work could ultimately lead to ultra-long optically induced filaments or plasma channels that are otherwise impossible to establish under normal conditions,’ said professor Demetrios Christodoulides, who is working with the graduate students on the project.

‘In principle such dressed filaments could propagate for more than 50 meters or so, thus enabling a number of applications.

‘This family of optical filaments may one day be used to selectively guide microwave signals along very long plasma channels, perhaps for hundreds of meters.’

Other possible uses of this technique could be used in long-distance sensors and spectrometers to identify chemical makeup.

The governments and dictatorships ruling over the so-called BRICS countries — Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — agreed to set up a new world bank that analysts say could further marginalize the increasingly unstable U.S. dollar, possibly helping to eventually dethrone it as the global reserve currency.

Meeting in Durban, South Africa, last week at their fifth annual summit, the socialist and communist-minded BRICS regimes also announced their support for creating a new world currency and full-fledged global governance.
Link below for “BRICS Regimes For New World Bank, Call For Global Currency”.
[link to www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com]

Like this:

According to a report published in Nature, biodiversity thrives in periods of warming; however alarmists do not want this fact to be misconstrued with the dangerous conditions man-made global warming is creating across the planet.

Bálint Miklós, researcher at the Biodiversity and Climate Research Center in Germany believes that there is an underestimation of biodiversity loss when it comes to purveyors of the man-made global warming myth. By using genetics to identify a species, Miklós asserts that climate change disrupts a species natural ebb and flow which is directly tied to global warming.

The myth of biodiversity suffering because of man-made climate change stems from a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) blog that claimed the polar bear population was suffering due to man-made climate change. The claim of the drowning polar bears goes back to a federal study that was obviously doctored. The 2006 paper from the journal Polar Biology lacked any supporting evidence for its claims that “drowning-related deaths of polar bears may increase in the future if the observed trend of regression of pack ice and/or longer open-water periods continues.”

Biologist Charles Monnett, the lead scientist on the paper, who is currently working with the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, found a polar bear carcass and then devised the story that became the claim that polar bears were drowning.

However, researchers with the Government of Numavat in April of 2012 the found that polar bear populations are estimated at 66% higher than climate change alarmists predicted.

Geoengineering has been touted as a way to combat the effects of global warming. However, this experiment has been instrumental in actually creating those effects which are redirected to blame the human population for participating in civilization.

However, in May of this year, it was found that chemtrails were polluting thunderclouds which is causing damage to the environment and the planet’s natural weather patterns.

The pollution drenched thunderclouds are most pervasive at night which causes warmer temperatures. The study asserts that these clouds do not reflect sunlight, but trap heat within them and cause global warming effects.

Severe droughts have plagued the US and are expected to continue through the next two decades. Using computer models, these predictions are based on statistical data with regard to sea surface temperatures. The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) a federally funded agency agrees with the predictions.

One way to combat this phenomenon is to shoot salt water into clouds to create “oceans” in our skies. These clouds, it is believed, could reflect sunlight back out, thereby cooling the planet.

Researchers at the University of Washington suggest the idea of marine cloud brightening. Using this brightening to manipulate the earth’s weather patterns, according to these scientists, is of no concern as far as its impact on our natural environment.

Other efforts, such as cloud seeding , could be used to decrease the strength of hurricanes. By reflecting light away from the ocean surface, the theory is that these storms would pass over cooler water and not intensify. Drones could be used to spray seawater into the atmosphere, causing the clouds to thicken and last longer; thereby reflecting more sunlight out and weakening the tropical waters below.

Calculations suggest that this technique could lower the ocean’s surface temperature by several degrees, which would in tow lower the strength of a hurricane by potentially one Category.

For less than $5 billion annually, solar radiation management (SRM) could mimic the effects of a volcanic eruption with the use of sulfuric aerosols dispensed into the atmosphere. This scheme would not reduce CO2 levels, yet alter the temperature and precipitation levels across the globe.

Justifying the need for a cooling effect, David Keith, director of the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy is pushing the releasing of nanotechnology with sulfuric aerosols into the Earth’s atmosphere to reflect sunlight back out into space. Keith manages the million-dollar geoengineering research that is funded by Bill Gates and the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research.

Alarmists are asserting that volcanic eruptions could double or triple current levels of the chemical elements bromine and chlorine in our stratosphere; as well as upper atmosphere depleting the ozone layer.

Solar engineering will directly amplify specific areas of study as the have chosen sulfuric dust the mimics the emissions of volcanoes. An intended consequences of solar geoengineering is the whitening of our skies because of the nano particles being released to reflect sunlight. Sulfate aerosols cause whiter daytime skies and sunset to glow brighter.

In a study published in the journal Remote Sensing , co-author Dr. Roy Spencer reported that real data from NASA’s Terra Satellite completely contradicts the assumptions made by climate change alarmists.

According to a press release , at the University of Alabama, Spencer said: “The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show. There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”

Researchers with GEOMAR have surmised that man-made bromine and chlorine are being expelled by volcanoes into the atmosphere in two to three times the quantity produced by man. Because volcanic eruptions can be carried across the globe, these elemental explosions could lead to ozone layer depletion as well as impact the Arctic and Antarctic.

According to a study conducted by the International Energy Agency in 2011, the Arctic is currently cooling and the effects brought on by sulfuric aerosols would cause more damage to the planet’s natural ability to cycle through its temperature fluxuations.

The focus of solar geoengineering is in the Arctic where the alarmists theorize that the necessity is the greatest to combat the melting of the ice-sheets. However, their disregard for natural cycles of the earth and the cyclical flow of melting and refreezing of these ice-sheets are the real danger to our planet’s normal seasonal cycles.

One of the founders of the eco-fascist movement, James Hansen, co-authored a study wherein he pointed out that it was not man-made CO2 that was causing global warming. Hansen wrote: “Our estimates of global climate forcings indicate that it is the non-CO2 GHGs that have caused most observed global warming.”

Hansen is one of the most vocal of the climate change alarmists. Considering that he is lying about the effects of man on the planet’s temperature, he is also one of the most prevalent purveyors of propaganda in recent times.

Like this:

Why in the World Are They Spraying is the sequel to the ground-breaking film that exposed the reality of chemtrails and geoengineering.

Worldwide the general public is aware that the Earth’s natural weather patterns are being disrupted by man-made influence. The climate change alarmists would have us believe that CO2 is the culprit. However it is obvious that the geoengieering being conducted by various governments and sanctioned by the UN are the actual cause for the unnatural weather we are experiencing.

To combat global warming, they are using solar engineering to whiten skies to reflect sunlight back out into space; however this aluminum aerosol sprayed into the atmosphere causes darkening of the Earth and cools the planet which will have dangerous repercussions.

They are controlling the weather. They are creating the weather. With geoengineering, the natural occurrences of the planet are being created by global Elite in conjunction with certain governments to invent the effects we call global warming. This has a twofold effect:

1. Complete terra-forming of the planet
2. Create climate change which can be blamed on human influence

James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and eco-fascist, predicts that the warming of the Earth is happening and his “projections about increasing global temperature have been proved true. But I failed to fully explore how quickly that average rise would drive an increase in extreme weather .”

The alarmist scientists claim that the global temperature has risen an estimated 0.8 degrees Celsius because of recent extreme events that are occurring with more frequency.

The study, headed by Professor Richard Muller, physicist with the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) was startled by the findings and commented: “We were not expecting this, but as scientists, it is our duty to let the evidence change our minds.” Muller, once a skeptic, now claims he is “converted”.

The team of scientists at Berkeley used data provided by NASA, NOAA and various weather station records. Funding for the project partly comes from the Charles G Koch Charitable Foundation. Another $100,000 in monies was provided by the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research which was created by Bill Gates.

The most startling “evidence” in favor of man-made climate change is funded by many globalist organizations who are also heavily investing in geoengineering projects to alter the weather of the Earth in support of their false claims.

In his paper, Hansen says “some additional warming will occur over the next few decades. However, we can slow, halt and reverse global warming over a period of several decades. The key requirement is to stop subsidizing fossil fuels and to begin to collect a fee from fossil fuel companies in proportion to the amount of carbon they are putting into the air.”

Carbon dioxide, being monitored in the Arctic by alarmist scientists, is being measured at 400 parts per million of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere.

Klaus–Ekart Puls, physicist and meteorologist, has analyzed the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claim that regulating CO2 will “regulate climate change.” Puls found that the IPCC’s assertion is based on “speculative model projections, so-called scenarios – and not prognoses. Because of climate’s high complexity, reliable prognoses just aren’t possible.”

Puls agrees that sea levels have risen, however “it’s important to remember that mean sea level is a calculated magnitude, and not a measured one. There are a great number of factors that influence sea level, e.g. tectonic processes, continental shifting, wind currents, passats, and volcanoes. Climate change is only one of ten factors.”

The American Geophysical Union commented on research into the melting of ice sheets that: “It turns out that past studies, which were based on computer models without any direct data for comparison or guidance, overestimate the water temperatures and extent of melting beneath the Fimbul Ice Shelf [in the Antarctic]. This has led to the misconception, Hattermann said, that the ice shelf is losing mass at a faster rate than it is gaining mass, leading to an overall loss of mass. The team’s results show that water temperatures are far lower than computer models predicted . . .”

In response to climate change, the UN, governments and private corporations have collaborated on geoengineering projects claiming to combat the effects of global warming. However, a team of European scientists are saying that geoengineering will cause serious global droughts. The artificial reduction of sunlight on the planet’s surface will create the problems that alarmists are claiming is being caused by human expulsion of CO2.

The authors of the study say that their computer models are not “meant to give realistic ideas about potential applications of climate engineering . . . [but] possible adverse effects that could come of such designed changes to the Earth’s climate.”

Bill Gates and Daniel Keith have joined forces to support the spraying of thousands of tons of sun-reflecting synthetic sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back out into space. Although scientists are asserting that this action will alter earth’s natural weather patterns while environmental groups decry that geoengineering nullifies their efforts to purport their campaigns to convince the public that man-made climate change is directly causational to human emissions of CO2.

Keith manages the million-dollar geoengineering research that is funded by Bill Gates and the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research. These monies come directly from Gates’ personal funds.

Mainstream media reports that the Greenland Ice Sheet is melting at an exorbitant rate, which will free 240 billion tons of fresh water into the oceans annually. The IPCC is focusing on this as a cause for more alarm. Havoc will be realized as New York City will see seas rising which may displace residents and cause massive damage.

However, Danish researchers have studied archival photos to compare current claims of rapid melting. Kurt Kjaer, led author of the study and professor at the University of Copenhagen, stated that the glacier is melting and reforming at a normal rate and therefore “it’s wrong to use the current melting rate to make predictions about sea level rise in the coming century, as some studies have done.”

Use of geoengineering is supported by member of the scientific community that is working in line with the climate change alarmists. These modifications extend to plate tectonics, ocean fertilization, cloud seeding, Co2 sequestration and military weaponry.

Project Cirrus (PC), a.k.a. Project Stormfury), was conducted by the US government between 1962 and 1983, in an attempt to manipulate the weather by affecting hurricane behavior.

PC was headed by General Electric, the US Army Signal Corps, theOffice of Naval Research and theUS Air Force.

TheGovernment Accountability Office(GAO) statesin their studythat “climate engineering technologies, focusing on their technical status, future directions for research and potential responses.” The GAO reviewed the scientific literature and government reports, consulted experts with a wide variety of backgrounds and viewpoints, and surveyed 1,006 adults across the United States.

The GAO concluded that “climate engineering technologies do not now offer a viable response to global climate change.”

Solar radiation management (SRM), a technique for blocking the sun’s light in order to prevent access heat from affecting the Earth’s surface, has been used in many countries including:

• The United States
• Brazil
• Costa Rica
• England
• Most European countries

SRM consists of spraying crystals and toxic chemicals such as sulfate aerosols and barium into the upper atmosphere.

Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri, environmental writer and former university professor and scholar, states: “For more than a decade, first the United States and then Canada’s citizens have been subjected to a 24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our heads made of a toxic brew of poisonous heavy metals, chemicals, and other dangerous ingredients. None of this was reported by any mainstream media. The USDepartment of Defense(DOD) and military have been systematically blanketing all our skies with what are known as Chemtrails (also known as Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering).”

The GAO admits that current geoengineering techniques are immature and that many of them could have potentially negative consequences. Yet, the consensus of governmental agencies has chosen to disregard the health hazards to the general public in favor of the continued use of geoengineering.

Scientists in support of geoengineering, knowing “major technology risks or limited future climate change” show their bias toward the “science”. The GAO have looked toward the private sector because governments and corporations working with them subvert their findings and conduct experiments worldwide without consent.

According to theGeoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy(GGTP) report, produced by the Congressional Research Service, the US government “has joined with other nations . . . as a participant in several international agreements on climate change.”

The experimental aspect of geoengineering in the US is directed in the “absence of a comprehensive [climate change] policy” that will “modify the Earth’s climate” and make these technologies available to “foreign governments and entities in the private sector to use unilaterally without authorization from the US government or an international treaty.’

Oversight concerning geoengineering research and experimental projects is allocated to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy (DoE), Department of Agriculture (DoA), and the Department of Defense.

Although there is no provision, many of the UN’s international treaties relating to climate change, maritime pollution and air pollution are used to govern the pursuit of geoengineering.

In 2010, the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) outlined the necessity of geoengineering for the sake of saving the Earth’s biodiversity.

The US government, using the UN’sIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) as their guide, has created policies to mitigate the fabled effects of man-made climate change.

The GGTP states that “geoengineering technologies, applied to the climate, aim to achieve large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance in order to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic (i.e., human-made) climate change; these climate modifications would not be limited by country boundaries.”

In 2009, the Congress’ House Science and Technology Committee discussed “potential environmental risks and benefits of various proposals, associated domestic and international governance issues, evaluation mechanisms and criteria, research and development (R&D) needs, and economic rationales supporting the deployment of geoengineering activities.” The United Kingdom (UK), Germany, and India provided scientists that supported the engagement of geoengineering technologies in the name of reducing emissions, preserving “climate sensitivity”, and climate thresholds under the pursuit of political, social and economic mitigation strategies.

The UN’s assertion that climate change is directly causal to humans has inspired that mandates for geoengineering governance. This scheme relies on no scientific data or research studies, but rather real world experiments with chemtrail technologies conducted by governmental agencies and private sector corporations employed by policymakers and international entities.

Through the covering of governmental policy, the UN hopes to design technologies to control the climate; advance geoengineering options in lieu of effectively mitigating greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions (for example, could result in a number of adverse effects, including ocean acidification, stresses on biodiversity, climate sensitivity shocks, and other irreversible consequences); engage the private sector corporations by enticing them with government subsidies while examining their ownership models, intellectual property rights and trade and transfer mechanisms for the dissemination of geoengineering technologies.

While the UN anticipated that the general public would become aware of their schemes (as is happening now) they planned a propaganda campaignto assert transparency while hiding the actuality of critical technologies to avoid liabilities and compensation to the public for adverse effects of geoengineering.

To cover up their unethical impact on the Earth, the UN created “ information” to be made available to the public and hired scientists to praise their deployment of geoengineering.

John Holdren, US Science Adviser to Obama, has come out publicly to claim thatgeoengineering will assist the planetin stabilizing its weather with regard to global warming.

Holdren says geoengineering as a perfectly viable way to cool the planet’s temperature. He fully supports the process of releasing particles of barium, magnesium, aluminum, nano-fibers, bacillus blood spores and other chemicals to reflect sunlight away from the Earth.

The implementation of geoengineering, a scheme of the UN’s decisive endeavor to create global governance, is not only fully supported by the US government, but the UN’s direct policies and procedures are literally adopted as strategies of the Obama administration.

Canadian Man dives through a chemtrail, and lives to tell his story, but still in shock CANADIAN CHEMTRAIL SKYDIVER STILL IN SHOCK…. AUTHORITIES REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE ON SKY CRIMES

So why is it if a person poisons you on the ground, they can be charged with a crime… but if they spray the same poison in the air, as chemtrails… they get raises, bonuses, promotions, and other perks of the job…. oh yeah and of course freedom from trial, no arrests… no ongoing public investigation… how far does the chemtrail rabbit hole go? Are politicians getting special perks “to look the other way”… while forests die, oceans are radiated, weather patterns and storms are altered, and babies burn? They probably get paid $100′s thousands a year, paid for by your taxes, to watch you slowly die, while pretending to be “agents of change that you can believe in”… most but not all, lap it up… it’s enough… they’ve found leadership who will look away too, and it feels right.

Still the awakening continues… and at some point one may ask. “where is the public outrage, as chemtrails alter everything on earth and destroy all live as we know it?”

The lack of public reaction makes Red Deer skydiver Jason Murphy all the more of a hero… not only is he educating the fluoridated masses towards chemtrails… he actually has skydived through a chemtrail, and has lived to tell his story.

I’m still shocked that I was actually in a chemical-trail cloud….it burned to breathe in, I had a headache and felt a notch dumber for the rest of the day. The RCMP won’t investigate a crime that I tasted in the sky, they’ve been given orders to not do their jobs, the RCMP is a criminal organization.

it’s pretty hard to describe with words….I’ve been in natural clouds before, they didn’t burn to breathe….It was like something out of the movies, we exited the plane and stabilized then I saw we were going straigh towards a chemical-cloud and it must have been around 11,000 feet or so the burning started and was worst while I was in the chemical-cloud, as soon as we got through it the burning started to go away….I had a pretty good headache for the rest of the day and felt a little dumber then usual.

Indian in the machine: I’m posting this because I to have come up with chemtrail sickness in the past and I can see the regular spraying of toxins, altering all life on earth as we know it. I too am still shocked that chemtrails continue… I am shocked that so few people can attempt a take over of the planet, literally poisoning everything in sight… I suppose they believe they are “special”…. perhaps they feel they are the “chosen ones”… hang tight… as no evil, no matter how special you think your brand of evil is, will not be allowed on this planet after 2012… we’re entering the golden age… we’re actually leaving a evil age… still some folks can’t get over themselves…. yes the meek are inheriting the earth and yes “jesus” has returned… it’s been 2000 years and that’s when he said he would return. You may wish to meet him. the man history has called “jesus”…..

when it comes to chemtrails…. ignorance is not an excuse… especially when you’ve been on this webpage…

Like this:

The HAARP complex / ionospheric observatory up in Gakona Alaska, in association with University of Alaska Geophysical Institute, publishes live and historical charts of their fluxgate magnetometer. The traces represent the earth’s magnetic field.

It is interesting to overlay what the USGS considers to be ‘significant’ earthquakes on to the charts to observe if there is indeed any correlation at all between earthquakes and the earth’s magnetic field.

The following chart shows the period between late March and late April, a time when the earth shook with 8 ‘significant’ earthquakes. It also happened to be a time of apparent spikes and activity on the fluxgate magnetometer. The earthquakes are positioned at the top of the chart during the days when they occurred.

The next chart shows the period of time in May, up until today. The magnetometer was fairly quiet, and so were the earthquakes. However I do notice a spike that just occurred during today, May 20. This may or may not mean anything. But I thought it was noteworthy nonetheless.