U.S. Supreme Court

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS & STATION EMPLOYES v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 31. Argued October 22, 1964. Decided November 9, 1964.

James L. Highsaw, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Edward J. Hickey, Jr.

Stuart Bernstein argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were H. Templeton Brown and Robert L. Stern.

Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, believing that the questions which brought this case here should be decided, dissents from the dismissal of the writ.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

U.S. Supreme Court

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS & STATION EMPLOYES v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 31. Argued October 22, 1964. Decided November 9, 1964.

James L. Highsaw, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Edward J. Hickey, Jr.

Stuart Bernstein argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were H. Templeton Brown and Robert L. Stern.

Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, believing that the questions which brought this case here should be decided, dissents from the dismissal of the writ.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.