Interesting idea !
Is this data collection / processing tool intended to run from now on a continuous basis... let's say... why not.... forever...
Or is there somewhere some kind of coupon ban ?
How many possible votes do I (one single system) get ?
As it is self claimed as 'beta tests', should I wait for rc tests... ?
Moreover, the algorithm behind the inference of a "setup mistake" is uttermost interesting to me... is it in open-source ?

I'll retry a few more times before I go to bed. Coming from 98.198.198.151 if it helps you track it down in the logs (6:30AM here, soon to bed, dunno if ill be up long enough to suss it out on IRC or whatnot - I could do so tomorrow)

Sorry it took me so long to even look at it. From a quick view at the log now it seems it's got something to do with you having "CCACHE" (in uppercase) in your FEATURES variable. seems like my current code cannot handle that, yet.

cach0rr0 wrote:

I did have another question though regarding submissions from users with multiple Gentoo systems.

If I have a half dozen Gentoo machines, would you be interested in one from each?
Or would one submission per user be more useful data for you?

With the current test setup we don't really need that. With the production system later that will be interesting.

Sorry it took me so long to even look at it. From a quick view at the log now it seems it's got something to do with you having "CCACHE" (in uppercase) in your FEATURES variable. seems like my current code cannot handle that, yet.

no worries. yip, lcase'd it and it fired off fine far as I can tell - presumably the stuff below is simply cosmetic

Code:

Scanning http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/ for known errata.
Could not wiki for errata!
Current rating for vendor/model.
Could not get rating!
To share your profile:
<...snip...>

Funny enough, I'd not noticed ccache ever even working. Granted, its scope is narrow enough, but I wonder if having it set as such b0rked it.

sping wrote:

With the current test setup we don't really need that. With the production system later that will be interesting.

cool, noted. Just fired one off to put my name in the hat, as it were. Reckon I'll poke my head in here some time down the road and see if that's changed._________________Lost configuring your system?
dump lspci -n here | see Pappy's guide | Link Stash

The URL you mention used to be that one, yes. It's currently offline and the person in charge is currently travelling . I'm not yet sure what consequences to draw from that. I would say use the main tracker on bugs.gentoo.org for now and mention my nick if you lack permissions to assign to me directly.

thank to you for the quick fix
now it's working and I have just uploaded my HW stats.

sping wrote:

The URL you mention used to be that one, yes. It's currently offline and the person in charge is currently travelling . I'm not yet sure what consequences to draw from that. I would say use the main tracker on bugs.gentoo.org for now and mention my nick if you lack permissions to assign to me directly.

As a Gentoo Developer, if you need a separate bug tracker, you can ask to Robin H. Johnson (@Robbat2) to activate you a TRAC or REDMINE installation together with a git overlay on overlays.gentoo.org.

You have done an amazing job with gentoo-smolt and I really appreciate your efforts; I'd like to see it in Portage one day together with an official smolt.gentoo.org.

p.s.: I'm going to open a thread on the Italian sub-forum to ask to the Italian Community to test gentoo-smolt and report you more feedback._________________Arch Tester for Gentoo/FreeBSD
Equilibrium's Universe

I think the project is a good idea and I wouldn't mind submitting my info. But I'm having a wee bit of a problem getting past this point._________________People whom think M$ is mediocre, don't know the half of it.