On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 13:53, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> By accident I visited the RDF home page (http://www.w3.org/RDF/) and
> noticed that the RDF suite of specificaitons included the OWL requirements,
> OWL reference, OWL abstact syntax, OWL feature synopsis, and OWL test
> cases.
>
> I am unhappy with this characterisation of the OWL document, and of the Web
> Ontology working group in general. The work that went into the design of
> OWL was part of the W3C Semantic Web activity, not part of RDF. I ask that
> it not be mischaracterised as part of RDF.
Ooops; I brought that up with EricM a while ago, and we agreed to
fix it, but we didn't get around to it.
It's fixed now.
v 1.151 2003/03/10 20:04:06
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Bell Labs Research
> Lucent Technologies
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/