If my website now caters to Minnesota Geocachers, is this the place I would display it with the rest of the geocaching websites?

Yes, this is where it should be displayed if it is now a "geocaching" website.

Since there are no other geocaching forums (that I know of) in Minnesota, it seemed only fair to give cachers an option to choose. With this in mind, I have completely redeveloped my forums to cater to Minnesota Geocachers! If you are running into trouble or frustration here on the MnGCA Forums, I want to offer this link to my forums and website:

I am looking for forum moderators at this time to help me out. I will be working with my existing website to customize it towards the needs of the geocacher. I am looking for suggestions from anyone. On my forums, your thoughts will be valued. Together we can create a functional site and enjoyable forums.

Jaywc7
SwissPerpetual Admin

Notice : I am in no way degrading the mngca or it's forums. I simply want to direct any possible interest to my website...

Just want to keep this on the surface, since this is the only place I am allowed to post it...

jaywc7 -

I mean no offense here at all, but I think after the third posting those people who have been looking for something like this have gotten the message.

The webmaster asked you (and has asked others the same thing in the past) not to add links to your personal site in your signature and at the same time he offered you a link to the main page's links section but you refused that offer.

Saying that this is the only place you are allowed to post it is thus a bit misleading as you were offered a place in the links section but refused the offer.

August 4, 2004 by Pto (62 found)
Alls Well again @1:51am
[view this log on a separate page]
August 4, 2004 by Pto (62 found)
Probably not far behind Kitch - 10:44 or so after stopping nearby. Had quite a shocking experience at this cache...
Long story short, I have emailed King Boreas to confer.
Cache is A-OK, rehidden just as I found it+.
changed even and also left WG $1 I got at gas station nearby, SL, updated. Traveled bugs thru on my visit.

[This entry was edited by Pto on Wednesday, August 04, 2004 at 10:37:28 PM.]

Well - geocaching is getting to the point, that unless you have a very remote place in mind, there's probably already a cache there. Any time I think of a place and come to find it's available, I think of how quickly I should act to ensure a KB Dumpster doesn't show up. Unfortunately I'm a procrastinator. One example is the Penisula Point Park in Anoka. I had a cache there that was too close and not approved. Before I really had time to fix it, mt man archived it, and another cache sprung up there. Cache density is like a desert : In the absence of life, one can truly appreciate a lone remote desert flower blooming among thousands of square miles of dirt and rock. If there was thousands of flowers, that one would just be lost in the masses. ::josh envisions the clover field from dr. seuss' story horton hears a who:: That is why, when I am back in MN, I will return to cache placement. My new cache however will be unique, distant, remote, hard and - there won't be a sequel series to my original series based on someone elses series which broke some record and has to be numbered to keep it straight (like KB caches)...

7 of your 36 finds were mine. I have links to the logs. Not a single one of your logs mention anything negative, nor do they mention any problem with the cache. Most mention fun, good time, etc. If you edit, that nasty little note with the date will appear.

It seems to me that if one was going to publicly criticize someone else's caches, one would make sure their own caches were something to brag about._________________"Hi, I'm Moe, or as the women know me - Hey! You in the bushes."
-Moe, The Simpsons