Pope to Emphasize ‘Human Ecology’ in Forthcoming Document

Thoughts abound on Holy Father's next writing

Pope Francis’ forthcoming document on ecology is likely to put the human person at the center and draw attention to the connection between environmental problems and poverty, according to a Church expert on theology and the environment.

Father Paul Haffner, professor of theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University and author of the book Towards a Theology of the Environment, believes such a document is urgently needed to correct many philosophical and theological errors that have crept into the environmental movement.

Although he says it is difficult to predict its contents, he believes it will "put the human person as central and focus also on the margins of society, those places where there are environmental problems because of poverty."

On Jan. 24, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi confirmed that the Holy Father had begun work on a "draft text on the topic of ecology, which could become an encyclical." But he stressed that the project is in an "early stage, so it is too early to make any prediction about the timing of possible publication."

He added that it is important to note that Pope Francis intends to put "particular emphasis" on the theme of "human ecology," a phrase used by Pope Benedict XVI to describe "not only how people must defend and respect nature but how the nature of the person — masculine and feminine, as created by God — must also be defended."

Benedict’s Footsteps

Since his election last year, Pope Francis has frequently shown concern for the environment, following the example of Benedict XVI. The pope emeritus was sometimes labeled the first "Green Pope." He persistently called for the safeguarding of creation, arguing that respect for the human being and nature are one. He also instructed that solar panels be installed on the roof of the Paul VI hall at the Vatican and signed the Vatican up for a project that offset carbon-dioxide emissions.

From the beginning of his pontificate, many have seen Pope Francis’ choice of papal name — St. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of ecology — as indicative of his concern for the environment. In his inaugural Mass homily, he called on everyone to be "protectors of creation, protectors of God’s plan inscribed in nature, protectors of one another and of the environment."

His later comments on the subject also give clues about the forthcoming document’s probable content. On World Environment Day last June, he stressed the need to "cultivate and care" for the environment, saying it is part of God’s plan that man "nurture[s] the world with responsibility," transforming it into a "garden, a habitable place for everyone."

Mankind, however, is driven by "pride of domination, of possessions, manipulation, of exploitation," he said, adding, "We do not ‘care’ for [the environment]; we do not respect it; we do not consider it as a free gift that we must care for."

He regretted that people are losing the "attitude of wonder, contemplation, listening to creation" and said the implications of living in a horizontal manner is that "we have moved away from God; we no longer read his signs."

And as Benedict had often done, Francis concluded by linking human ecology with environmental ecology, issuing a strong challenge to rethink the culture of waste and to oppose a lack of ethics in economy and finance. "I would like us all to make a serious commitment to respect and protect creation," he said, "to be attentive to every person, to counter the culture of waste and disposable [mentality], to promote a culture of solidarity" and of living alongside others, especially on the margins, as opposed to individualism.

The Pope most recently repeated his concerns in his annual speech to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See on Jan. 13. Noting the devastation caused by Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines last November, he warned against "greedy exploitation of environmental resources" and quoted the popular adage: "God always forgives, we sometimes forgive, but when nature — creation — is mistreated, she never forgives."

Errors of ‘Ecologism’

Environmentalists have welcomed news of the future document, and some hope it will cause a "paradigm shift" in the Church’s approach to the issue.

But this is the danger, according to Father Haffner, who feels secular society and the green movement are at risk of misinterpreting the Pope’s comments and believe he will subscribe to their worldview.

"We always have, as I say in my book Towards a Theology of the Environment, to distinguish between ecology as a science and ‘ecologism’ as an ideology," he said. "Ecologies that seemingly begin with the program of saving man’s environment quickly run their logic to the point where the environment takes absolute priority over man."

Father Haffner said this ideology "easily takes root in Darwinist circles," where man is seen to be the product of purely natural forces.

"Part and parcel of this pernicious view is the erroneous claim that man is simply one of a very large number of species, all equally valuable and enjoying the same rights," he said, adding that one ideology that is widespread in environmentalist circles "is the myth about overpopulation." Furthermore, he said, often those who exaggerate the effect of climate change "are also the same ones who want population control and all that entails."

He also noted other errors, which include "considering Earth or the cosmos as a gigantic living organism" — a view held by the former priest, theologian and ecologist Leonardo Boff — "or the errors of those with a pantheistic view of creation."

Father Haffner would like to see the new papal document "correct the many and various philosophical and theological errors which have crept into ‘green thinking,’ as I have done in my book, and also to make clear that the ecological problem is but one of many symptoms of a society which lives without God, without Christ."

Comments

@Gentes: Direct evidence for your bizarre claims? How about one actual quote that explicitly, directly says that? Not that could be INTERPRETED as meaning that; show where he ACTUALLY says anything of the kind.
-
Fascinating how when it comes time to cast yourself as the hero of a tragedy, victims of persecution by Rome (curiously reminiscent of the decades-long pose of Hans Kung and his ilk), you instantly transform into devotees of Jacques Derrida, claiming that the intended meaning of texts from this Pope doesn’t matter, only what you CHOOSE to read them as.

Posted by Andy on Friday, Feb 28, 2014 2:06 PM (EDT):

Expect Francis to build on Benedict. From B16’s “World Day of Peace” (2010):http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/peace/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20091208_xliii-world-day-peace_en.html
“Can we remain indifferent before the problems associated with such realities as climate change, desertification, the deterioration and loss of productivity in vast agricultural areas, the pollution of rivers and aquifers, the loss of biodiversity, the increase of natural catastrophes and the deforestation of equatorial and tropical regions?” (paragraph 4).
“Similar attention also needs to be paid to the world-wide problem of water and to the global water cycle system, which is of prime importance for life on earth and whose stability could be seriously jeopardized by climate change. Suitable strategies for rural development centred on small farmers and their families should be explored, as well as the implementation of appropriate policies for the management of forests, for waste disposal and for strengthening the linkage between combatting climate change and overcoming poverty. Ambitious national policies are required, together with a necessary international commitment which will offer important benefits especially in the medium and long term.” (paragraph 10)

Posted by Gentes on Wednesday, Feb 26, 2014 10:13 AM (EDT):

Why does Francis want to correct many philosophical and theological errors? He himself prefers that people go about making errors as long as they are actively engaged with the world. And even if Francis in this case does attempt to correct errors, he would be paid no more attention than the CDF, which he has urged the faithful to ignore.

Join the Discussion

We encourage a lively and honest discussion of our content. We ask that charity guide your words.
By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our discussion guidelines.
Comments are published at our discretion. We won’t publish comments that lack charity, are off topic, or are more than 400 words.
Thank you for keeping this forum thoughtful and respectful.