Alex Jones yesterday interviewed Dr
Forrest M. Mims, III, the Editor of Citizen Scientist Magazine and
Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas Academy of Science.
The discussion centered around the controversial University of Texas professor
who advocates the mass death of 90% of the world's human population.

Dr. Eric R. Pianka gave a speech to the Texas Academy of
Science last month in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the
population through the airborne ebola virus. Pianka's chilling comments, and
their enthusiastic reception again underscore the elite's agenda to enact
horrifying measures of population control.

Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka
gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the
necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill
period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus
kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the
victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.

Pianka was later presented with a distinguished scientist
award by the Academy. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to
prestigious universities worldwide.

The reason he is being awarded is because he is simply
espousing the views that have been put forward by UN agencies such as the United
Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), WHO and UNICEF and international NGO's such as
the International Planned Parenthood Federation, as well as The US Government
for the last 35 years.

We have previously documented the elite's hideous interest
in depopulation
techniques, an interest that mirrors the nightmare eugenics visions
of Nazi scientists in the 1940s.

This document lists as a priority birth-rate control in 13
key countries in the Third World, especially in South America. Extraordinary
resources were allotted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
to implement the policy of birth-rate control.

The memorandum also includes a section that lauds abortion
and states that " -- It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the
following reasons: 1) The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2)
Widespread lack of safe abortion techniques..."

The memorandum basically stresses the need to offer
increased aid for third world countries that agree to implement programs of
sterilization and depopulation.

The document contains too many hideous quotes to mention
here, read it for yourself byclicking
here.

Kissinger also prepared a depopulation manifesto for
President Jimmy Carter called 'Global
2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the third
world.

The United Nations Population Fund directly supports
policies such as that of the "one child policy" in Communist China which
encapsulates coercive and enforced abortion.

"Regrettably, the PRC has in place a regime of severe
penalties on women who have unapproved births. This regime plainly operates to
coerce pregnant women to have abortions in order to avoid the penalties and
therefore amounts to a program of coercive abortion. Regardless of the modest
size of UNFPAs budget in China or any benefits its programs provide, UNFPA's
support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities allows
the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive
abortion.

Yet The UNPFA seem to think this is a great thing

"China has had the most successful family planning
policy in the history of mankind in terms of quantity and with that, China has
done mankind a favour," United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) representative
Sven Burmester said last week. 10/11/99 Agence France-Presse

Under the Regan Administration legislation sponsored by
then-Rep.
Jack Kemp (NY) and then-Sen. Bob Kasten (WI) ensured funding to the
UNPFA was cut off for these very reasons. Yet is was no surprise when In 1993,
the Clinton Administration dramatically revised the official interpretation of
the Kemp-Kasten amendment in order to facilitate U.S. funding of UNFPA, thus
making available $14.5 million.

In May 2003, the House Committee on International Relations
narrowly adopted an an amendment by Rep. Joseph
Crowley (D-NY) revoking the ban on such participation with the
UNPFA. The amendment earmarked $100 million for UNFPA over the next two
years.

There are countless other instances of depopulation
programs, too numerous to go into in this brief article. We urge our readers to
research them and expose them further.

Dr Pianka's comments are merely echoes of the elite lust
for a Malthusian social Darwinist control mechanism. They wish to use the excuse
of having to "save the earth" in order to take away freedom and implement a
massive authoritarian control grid.

Dr Forrest Mims, who has been valiantly trying to expose
Pianka's hideous calls, commented that he wrote to Pianka - or "Dr Death" as he
has been dubbed - and asked for an explanation as to why he wanted to see a
worldwide epidemic that would only kill Africans. Pianka responded by saying he
was not racially prejudice and wanted to see 90% of all races exterminated.

"He wants an equal opportunity killer virus" Mims said.

Mims further quoted Pianka as having said that "We need to
sterilize everybody on the earth and make the antidote freely available to
anyone willing to work for it".

According to Mims, Pianka also praised China's "one child
policy" stating that "China was able to turn the corner and become the leading
world super power because they have a police state and they are able to force
people to stop re-producing."

"The only difference between Pianka
and Hitler is that Hitler stated he wanted to kill five and a half
million people, this guy is saying he wants to kill five and a half
billion people." Mims went on to say.

Mims also revealed that at another lecture, Pianka had a
cuddly toy,much like the one pictured below, shaped like the ebola virus which
he fawned over.

As stated in yesterday's article however, Pianka's doomsday
warning of the population bomb, for which Mims claims he presented no evidence
whatsoever, is complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are
declining and only in third world countries is it expanding dramatically.
Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this
world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level
out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that. "The population of the
most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until
2050," states a United Nations
report. The UN population policies seem to be in direct
contradiction to THEIR OWN FINDINGS.

Conservation
International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface
was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is
commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state
of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.

Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6
child rate per household, so the western world population is actually in
decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and
South Korea. The UN has stated that the population will peak at 9 billion and
then begin declining.

In his attempts to alert the world to Pianka, Mims
approached the Associated Press who spiked the story despite it being extremely
newsworthy.

"We can't carry such an important story if it is just done
by a small time newspaper"

Mims stressed that "These people are part of the dark ages
of the media, they need to realize that it is the radio and the web that are
carrying the ball. The newspapers are way behind the times, the Associated Press
said they would call today, they have not called."

The AP suggests that Pianka has back-peddled and said that
he was only trying to warn against epidemic occurring due to overpopulation
completely. This contradicts his clear statement that airborne ebola should be
used to eliminate 90% of the human population. He is not warning against a
disease epidemic, he is advocating one and the Associated Press has displayed
yellow journalism in not pointing out this disconnect.

The AP states:

A University of Texas biology professor has been
targeted by talk radio, bloggers and vitriolic e-mails - including a death
threat - after a published report that he advocated death for most of the
population as a means of saving the Earth.

This is NOT the story, the story is that the man WANTS TO
KILL 90% OF PEOPLE ON THE PLANET.

Forrest Mims, pictured above, ended the interview by
warning that if indeed the students of Pianka agree with his views, they could
become scientists in the future and seriously research and hope to implement
such policies.

Mims cited that the 1918 flu virus that caused a mass
epidemic has recently been re-created. There are also other MORE DEADLY viruses
in existence in labs across the world. If someone wanted to release these in
order to "save the world" they wouldn't have to spend years creating the means
to do it.

Mims ended the interview by warning that if indeed the
students of Pianka agree with his views, they could become scientists in the
future and seriously research and hope to implement such policies.

Mims stated that he is "deeply disturbed" with the
scientific community:

"I interviewed the student who became a convert to this for
45 minutes and sir, you are absolutely correct, there are people out there who
are willing to do this"

Due to the overwhelming popularity of our
$39.95 yearly special, we are bringing it back for Spring! This is your chance
to receive over 5 months of access completely free compared to the standard
price. Click
here to subscribe!

Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.