Commissioner's Final Determination
Out of Court Settlement/ Can't Be Overturned

Acting Commisssioner Linda McMahon issued a final denial which can only
be overturned or modified in a USDC as cited in Title 42 USC 405(g) Judicial Review:
...No findings of fact or decision by the Commissioner shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or government agency
except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Commissioner or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought
under Section of 1331 or 1346 of Title 28,United States Code, to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter
1. In 2007 Commissioner made an admission of fact and law at Bar that Chris Walters is disabled and changes; termination; or suspension of the SSI benefits package are denied by ORDER Of several US Courts at request of SSA Commissioner until such time as
the question of law in heard in USDC Title 42 USC Sec 405(G)H) Judicial Review and challenges
US Supreme Court requirement of fair hearing:

Chris Walters, )
vs. )
Judith McCall )
CIV NO CV-97-AR-1802-S

This link concerns"Barbecue Bob" Aka State Attorney General Bob Butterworth known nationally
as "Barbecue Bob" for his work with Florida Electric Chair. Reportedly worked behind the scenes to help win Florida ruling for disabled cancer patient requiring surgery to slap a
police officer upside of the head as part of his campaign against medicaide fraud. This should give you some insight as to what the medical, welfare, and legal system was doing
instead of arranging minor surgery for cancer in 1996.
Leon County District Attorney Question of commission of crime USDA Civil Rights ADA Complaint ackowledged
and received July 10,1997 HHS Civil Rights ADA based complaint acknowledged and received

I'm Part of A Conspiracy To Deny Your
Social Security Benefits

As Counselor Flories explained this stranger walks up one day and proceeds
to explain his role in what he describes as an extensive conspiracy to deny me my Social Security
benefits. I was very impressed with what Mr. Flores describes about my background and history
with no imput from me. His employer was not in a great hurry to volunteer the details in USDC

Presiding Judge Fred Biery
US District Court Western District Texas
U.S. District Clerk's Office
655 East Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206

Service of Executive ORDER
FIAT to Process Social Security Claim By USA

This Link Case HistoryWalters v Miller USDC,WDT 1997 These legal actions are administrative law questions largely seeking administrative law ORDERS from mistakes apparently made to Social Security staff.
The United States Attorney Gary Anderson and Texas Assistant State Attorner General Morgan filed briefs explaining they could violate the law whenever they wish and
operate their programs without judicial review by any court of law under the "Divine Right of Kings" and as guaranteed by Title 42 USC Sec 405(g)(h)Judicial Review
after the Social Security Commissioner makes his final denial (10 years later):

Administrative Law Judge Suggest
Plague Carrier Work @ Whataburger

Hi there and welcome to the Social Security Administrations Cafe of Death serving the world famous Heptitis Burger by our own professional
plague carrier Chris. My offical finding of 7-12-1999 suggested Chris might consider employment in the food service industry-Whataburger for
instance. I neglected to send Chris a copy of my findings so Chris had to pay $50.00 to ride 60 miles a copy of the report ...and
read the opinion of a doctor he has never met...

Amicus Curiae Brief Dismissed
For Want of Prosecution

This Link Case HistoryWalters v Miller USDC,WDT 1997 These legal actions are administrative law questions largely seeking administrative law ORDERS from mistakes apparently made to Social Security staff.
The United States Attorney Gary Anderson and Texas Assistant State Attorner General Morgan filed briefs explaining they could violate the law whenever they wish and
operate their programs without judicial review by any court of law under the "Divine Right of Kings" and as guaranteed by Title 42 USC Sec 405(g)(h)Judicial Review
after the Social Security Commissioner makes his final denial (10 years later):

Petiton For Writ of Certiorari Denied

Wiliam M. Sutter
Clerk Of The Court
May 19, 1999
Chris Walters
PO Box 1634
Kerrville, TX 78029-1634
Dear Mr.Walters:
Your papers were received in this office on May 19,1999, and
must be returned for the following reason:
Your case must first be reviewed by a United States Court of
appeals or by the highest state court in which a decision could be
had. 28 USC 1254 and 1257.
Enclosed for your information is a sample petition for a writ
of certiorari, a memorandum regarding the preparation of a petition,
and a copy of this Court's Rules of Procedure.
Also returned is money order number 3435177121, dated May 13,
1999, in the amount of $300.00
Sincerely,William K. Suter, Clerk
By: Ruth Jones:
(202-479-3022

US District Judge Sam Sparks
US Magistrate Albright
US District Court
Western District Texas
U.S. District Clerk's Office
655 East Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206
(210) 472-6550

Social Security Throws Away
Medical Records Questions on Rules of Evidence and Venue

Walters v Apfel USDC, WDT 1999 Amicus Curiea Social Security Question Judge Sam Sparks cites
ongoing lack of USDC Jurisdiciton This link reviews Social Security Administrations ongoing demands to hold hearings in
states where SSI applicant goes not reply; throw away medical records; and other bizarre claims representing the earlier claim
the United States does not operate under color of law or statute but "Divine Right of Kings". Resulted in Human Rights
question being filed with United Nations High Commission On Human Rights

Human Rights Question Removed to UN High Commission
On Human Rights Without Objection of Court

US District Judge Sam Sparks
US Magistrate Albright
US District Court
Western District Texas
U.S. District Clerk's Office
655 East Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206

US District Judge Sam Sparks
US Magistrate Albright
US District Court
Western District Texas
U.S. District Clerk's Office
655 East Durango Blvd.,
San Antonio, Texas 78206

United States District Court For
Judge James Robertson Presiding
for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
District of Columbia
202-354-3190

Question On Holding SSI Hearing
in Florida State Where Applicant Does Not Reside

Walters v Apfel USDC, NDF 1999 Amicus Curiea SSA Question transfered from DC to Florida This link is a civil action brought under
Title 42 USC 1983 questioned
Social Security Administration right to hold SSI hearing in Tallahassee, Florida in September, 1997 in a state where Chris
Walters does not reside. After case was transfered to Florida it disappeared off the face of the earth and was never heard from
again.

Chico, CA after stealing my food stamps and
GA benefits in Butte County the local SSI office declined to permit me to withdraw my SSI
claim- The next city permitted the case to be withdrawn to prevent officials from
stealing more of my benefits.

3rd PARTY COMPLAINT FOR MONETARY &
DECLARATORY RELIEF

Bradshaw v Odom, Walters State Court NC 3rd Party Lawsuit for Damages Against NC This Link Is a civil action for monetary, declaratory, and mandatory relief authorized by
North Carolina Statutes & Rules of Civil Procedure; for the Plaintiff David Bradshaw to
sue Defendants Chris Walters and Secretary Carmen Hooker Odom acting in her offical
capacity as the Secretary of North Carolina Health and Human Services and Disability
Determinations Services claiming Carmen Hooker Odom, her employees acting under
color of North Carolina Statutes 143-545.1(b)(2);143 -564.1 and "adopted rules" and Title
42 Sec 423 (d)(5)(b)Disability insurance benefits payments (d)(5)(b) negiligence in
preforming their official duties in processing Chris Walters disability claim lead to David
Bradshaw being infected and requiring surgery on 2 separate occassions and
hospitalization.
The facts clearly show that the Disability Service employees stated for 2
years they have thrown away Chris Walters 90 some odd doctors and medical sources in
April, 2003 and March 2004; and deported his Social Security claim to San Luis Obispo
CA and as a result of both premeditation and negiligence created a hazard by exposing
David Bradshaw and others to Chris Walters communicable medical condition. David
Bradshaw seeks Monetary Relief and compensatory damages from both Chris Walters
and Carmen Hooker Odom for hospital bills, pain and suffering and punative damages
from Carmen Hooker Odom for reckless negiligence in creating a situation which lead to
David Bradshaw being injured.

Chris Was Denied Permission
To Register for Work/Impediment #19

The letter on the upper right is a demand from an HUD vendor in Vancouver, Washington in 2006 that Chris Walters discontinue his medical treatment;
stop asking for his SSI benefits and go look for a job. This Courtsey Brief explained to Share House
that their request is prohibited by an existing ORDER of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals and the
US Supreme Court ruled in Terry Schindler Schiavo V Michael Schiavo that the
the patient is the decider of what is and is not appropriate medical treatment. The Share House subsequently denied Chris Walters
services during a major winter storm with the expectation that Chris Walters would either die or suffer severe injury as
a result of exposure and resulted in this written request addressed too Federal Prosecutor for a Federal
Grand Jury Investigation of the organization.

Dr Rooert Canon declined to mail letter from Appeals Council to
Seattle where Chris Walters resided and received state disability payments. Apparent conspiracy was designed
to hijack the venue to the Office of ALG William Herbert in San Antonio, TX even though the Austin address
used has a venue in Dallas. Since I am a legal
resident of Oregon State receiving disability benefits in Washington the proper venue would be in
Portland, Oregon

Press On Image To Enlarge
US Circuit Court of Appeals
for District of Columbia
Before Chief Judge Sentelle, Tatel, and Garland
333 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 354-3000

Walters V Asture 1:09-cv-00956-UNA the State of North Carolina & Guilford County, NC
attempt to cut off Medicaid was Quashed by USDC and Commissioners noted appear to US Circuit Court of Appeals stated they had
no interest in a review; hearing; or other changes in the case

Exhibit #539 Tort to Recover $70.00 For
Safe Deposit Box Overcharge

Walters v Bank of America USDC,NM Bank of American steals contents of safe deposit box with apparent
intent of stealing legal briefs related to Walters v Asture USDC,NM. Presiding Judge expresses no problem with Bank stealing bank box without court ORDER
After receiving request to close Safe Deposit Box 259 in Las Cruces, NM the bank went on ahead and charged me $70.00 which I have asked the Court to return

In September 2011 the Boise Rescue Mission is making a determined effort to put the grabs on my Social Security
check or be denied services for life. The action filed in USDC, ID ask to have the Federal non profit law declared
unconstitutional statutes unconstitutional based on seperation of church/state. Action deemed moot by parties & court when I went
into skilled nursing home.

Walters v Asture USDC Idaho Presiding Magistrate authorizes Judicial Review based on
HHS termination of medicaid-however case dropped when SSA Commissioner realizes I am in a Skilled Nursing Facility. This page reviews Commissioner Asture first request for Judicial Review as filed in USDC, Idaho which the USDC Idaho granted to move forward. As I was
in Kindred Skilled Nursing Facility at this time creating $7,000 in medical bills monthly the Commissioner simply turned the benefits back on ending the
need for a Judicial Review at this time. A Self Professed Texas Terrorist appeared and demanded to have
Chris Walters thrown out of nursing home; kidknapped to Texas; held without trial or legal representation:

Press On Image For FINAL ORDER
United States District Court Idaho
US Court - District of Idaho
The Honorable US Magistrate Larry Boyles Presiding
550 W Fort St. Room 400
Boise, ID 83724
208-334-1361

Walters v Congress USDC, MTAmicus Curiea removes
question to Congress and final removal through 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2018 the US House created the Restoration of Powers Act to prevent changes
in US Statutes not approved by Congress and the Obama Administration has the military implement Operation Jaded Helm to deal with questions of sedition
by state or local governments.

USDC Considers Cause
Meriorious Title 28 USC 1331 Federal Question

Walters v Asture USDC, NDT request for relief where SSA refuses to move SSI claim to Amarillo and
other relief from 3rd party tampering. Although no summons were issues the questions were resolved by parties complaint withdrawn
Walters v Asture USDC,NDT
Appellate question withdrawn when issues ceased to exist

Civil Case: 2-13CV-0156-JBBUSDC, NDT a question
asked if Montana could reduce SSA benefits by $200 a month without Judicial Reeview. The Court never authorized service of process on SSA; there are no hearings; or evidence
of 2 parties present and litigating before the Court. The proceedings are a total sham or if
a person wished to be kind a nonsuit

Question of Placing 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals
Under Temporary Martial Law-Unable to Support Social Security Act

Walters v Asture Appeal 5th Circuit question of placing 5th Circuit Court of Appeals for
declining to support Social Security statutes as previously supported by 5th Circuit in 1999 How can a US Circuit Court of Appeals Judge sit on the bench and claim to be unable to support
and defend the Social Security Act as it was cited on the other side of the page?

1. Intake interview with Mission Counselor 12-4-2012 suggest
shelter available for long term stay; however a computer hacking;
stalking; and problem with Spokane PD. The Mission staff generated
a legal question which has to be authorized by the USDC:
2. Exhibit J Legal question asked
by Union Gospel Mission is prohibited by standing ORDERS of several US Circuit Court of Appeals and
has to be authorized by a USDC

These are a series of Amicus Curiae Briefs filed in USDC,Arizona which review weaknesses in various
programs and recommend possible solutions. Neither the US Attorney; The Obama Administration;
or Congress could be bothered to put in appearance in court and reply: The Court refused
to permit moving forward with the Complaint for a lack of controversey.

Walters v Colvin USDC, NM A proposed tort which was withdrawn and the Court commenced a
rather large fraud by pretending litigation occured where 2 parties are not present at bar; no summons were issued; and apparently uses the filing to act as bully
bar to complain how other courts conduct their proceedings using many fraudlent statements Case HistoryWalters v Colvin 10th Circuit 3 Judge Appeallate extends the fraud and fiction created by
Judge in Lower Court that an aciton at law exist and challenges right of Appellant to withdraw Appeal
Walters v Colvin proposed Appeal to Supreme Court withdrawn because I
cannot understand complex instructions for filing brief with Supreme Court

Title 28 USC 1951 (d(b)(e) The Well Spring of Judicial Activism-Challenges US Constitution?

The constitution and common sense suggest an action at law must have 2 parties
at bar; represented by counsel; submitting litigation for consideration by an impartial
Judge. Title 28 USC 1951 however requires the Court to leave it's unbias status
and decide if an action where an poor party is present is meritorious
The fly in the ointment is that under this statute there are never 2 parties present at
bar and represented by counsel submitting arguments for consideration because
the Court is encouraged by the statute to Quash the acton even if the defendant has
agreed the case has merit. As Walters V SSA there is a family of 38 cases where the
parties have never met in any capacity in 17 years although the Courts refer to the
existance of a case; litigation;...an obvious sham

USDC Judge Norml L. Moon
States Complaint To Complex To Understand

Civil Case: Civil # 6:14-cv-00049-NKMUSDC, WDV the Judge
explained the case was too complicated for the Defendant to understand who immediatley turned my SSI Benefits back on and dismisses
the case as frivilious. The Social Security Administration impeaches the Judge by granting the relief I am entitled too and turning
my benefits back on.

Dr. Strandberg
Defines Disabilities Cardiac, Digestive, Veins In Legs

Medical examination 10-25-2005 by Dr. Eric Strandberg; US Health Works
recommended Echo Cardio Gram; Venous Studies of Legs; and Colonoscopy. No restrictions
on computer or job training. Letter from DSHS 10/26/2005 Oks GAU Case #3491348 through 1/31/2006;
including Medical and Food Stamps. A person of reasonable and common intelligence would expect all
the medical test to be completed within 2 or 3 weeks.

Admission of Disabilities
By Social Security

Social Security Administration
Date Feb 22-2000
Claim 261-90-6357
BS
Supplemental Security Income
Notice of Disapproved Claim
Christopher A Walters
c/o Boise Rescue 520 Front Street
Boise,ID 83704
We are writing about your clim for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments. Based on a review of your
health problems, you do not quality for benefits on this claim. This is because you are not disabled under
our rules:
Trained Staff Reviewed Your Case and Made These Decisions. They work for your State, but used our rules.
The determination on your claim was made by an agency of the State. It was not made by your own doctor or
by any other agency's written report about you. However, any evidence they gave us was used in making this
determination. Doctors and other people in the State agency who are trained in disability evaluation reviewed
the evidence and made the determination based on Social Security law and regulations.
The Decision on Christopher A. Walters' Case** The following reports were used to decide
your claim (16 of 100 medical sources)Birmingham Health Care for Homelss response received Salvation Army Hospital
& Health Clinic Cooper Green Hospital Good Shephered Hospital El Rio Clinic Douglas Community Hospital Columbia
Community Hospital Columbia Capital Medical Center Cowlitz Family Health Center Mercy Medical Center Brackenridge
Hospital Kaweah Delta Hospital Helping Hands Clinic Shands Clinic Munroe Regional Medical Center
Lakeland Reg Med Ctr Doug Wright, MD. We have determined that your condition is not severe enough to keep you from working.
We considered the medical and other information your age, education, training, and work experience inn
determining how your condition affects your ability work to work:
You said you are disabled due to skin cancer, malignant melanoma, GI disorder, frequent vowel movements,
blood clots in the legs and hepatitis. The medical shows that you have a history of these problems.
1. It shows that you have surgical excision of melanoma in the past.
There is no evidence of recurrence (**failed to include reports on additional treatment).
2. It shows that you have been treated for intestinal problems with frequent bowel movements.
3. You do have a mild edema and varicosities in your lower extremities, but no ulcerations.
4. You should avoid direct exposure to sunlight.
5. You should also have access to restroom facilities.
Upon recent examination, your chest is clear. Your heart rate is regular. There is not
evidence of masses or abdominal tenderness. Your weight is stable. The evidence does not
show severe neurological deficits. You are able to walk and move about independently. Based
on the objective medical finding your condition is not of the severity that would prevent you
from doing all types of work. Although you have no past substantial work, you should have
the capacity to preform a wide range of other work within your limitations. Thus, your cliam
is denied.>>>>... Continues on standardized form information.