In the event Nadal doesnt return by Roland Garros (and in decent shape) then yes a huge one. Murray should win Wimbledon, he is a better grass courter than Djokovic, but it doesnt mean he will. It will probably be hard for Federer to beat Djokovic at a slam again with his increasing age, and that Djokovic is not likely to be as off as he was at times in 2012 again, even at Wimbledon (although if he were to do it anywhere, that is probably his only chance at this stage). Murray could also stop Djokovic at the U.S Open like he did last year. With Nadal a big question mark at this point, Djokovic should win both the Australian and French Opens, it is the latter two that is the question mark. Wimbledon since he isnt an untouchable grass court player, and the U.S Open due to the pressure that would be on him to complete the Grand Slam if he has already won Wimbledon.

Not that again? He got lucky with the schedule (top part of the draw) and not having to play Fed. He still deserved his win 100% and congrats to him.
OK, now that's been said, they'd better get rid of that Super Saturday garbage once and for all. Djoko was WAY out of gas in the final (a bit like Murray was in USO 200. My patience is starting to wear thin with the USO's unique and aberrant scheduling in general.

Nope. Murray will probably win another slam this year, we still can't count Nadal out for the FO if he actually shows up and you can't count Federer out at possibly W or the USO. Djokovic will win two tops this year.

I don't think he will do it, mainly because of wimbledon. No idea how and why he won in 2011, but I don't think Djokovic is good enough to win wimbledon again. I see Federer, Murray and probably even others like Tsonga and Del Potro better than him. The ranking at the olympics represent my point of view of wimbledon.

__________________
"I'm better than most of the guys here in tennis and I'm also smarter than most. This justifies my sometimes cocky behavior." - Maximagq

Nole is a heavy favorite for AO. I don't really see Fed beat him there. Murray could, but it will be though.

If Nadal is not in good form for Roland-Garros, then Fed will give it a real shot, which I don't think he did in 2012. They are 3-3 on clay, 1-1 at RG. Nole would be a favorite, but it wouldn't be a given for him to beat Fed. Del Potro could also be a threat in Paris.

Nole won't be favorite at Wimby if Fed and Murray are in good form. Other player could beat him in a good day (Tsonga and Berdych).

The US Open is...open. It Murray, Federer, maybe Del Potro can beat him here.

He is in fine form. Nadal is out of the AO, the only possible threats to him are Murray, Federer, and even then, he has had many recent victories. Djoker owns Berdych and Tsonga. Just look at the ATP world tour finals.

In the French, it may be a close battle, but he has a much better chance against Nadal this time. Nadal would be low on confidence, playing experience. Also, the 2011 match was much closer than it seemed.

Wimbledon. HE lost to Federer, but by then, Federer's GS days would be numbered. Nadal didnt even play last Wimbledon, and it would have been so long since he wong there.

The US Open. Murray got quite lucky, and Djokovic, he wasnt playing his best due to the wind.

Did you get shot in the head, because there are so many fails in this post, I don't know where to begin.

No that's fine logic. Truthfully I don't think Djokovic is as good as Federer or Nadal overall, hence the reason that if neither of them could do it, why Djokovic?

Steve, I said bad logic because, obviously, Federer didn't win CYGS because Nadal at RG, and Djokovic will have a good chance in RG 2013, based on everything that's happening now with Nadal.

Nadal didn't win CYGS, because we have two Grand Slam in year on HC, he never won two HC GS in a season, that's why I think Djokovic has a good chance, he is first favourite in AO and USO(with Murray). Wimbledon will be the hardest for him, that's for sure, of course, first we need to see what will happen in AO.

__________________
''Laying awake in bed last night, I realized that in Federer's last 4 losses in Grand Slams, he has won a grand total of 1 set.'' - McEnroeisanartist

Nole is a heavy favorite for AO. I don't really see Fed beat him there. Murray could, but it will be though.

If Nadal is not in good form for Roland-Garros, then Fed will give it a real shot, which I don't think he did in 2012. They are 3-3 on clay, 1-1 at RG. Nole would be a favorite, but it wouldn't be a given for him to beat Fed. Del Potro could also be a threat in Paris.

Nole won't be favorite at Wimby if Fed and Murray are in good form. Other player could beat him in a good day (Tsonga and Berdych).

The US Open is...open. It Murray, Federer, maybe Del Potro can beat him here.

Without Nadal, Djoko would be the overwhelming favorite at RG. Fed is too old for red clay (in 2012, he lost to Djoko both in Rome and RG and was close to losing to Delpo at RG, it will be worse this year). The one slam I don't see Djoko winning is Wimbledon. Not that it is impossible but I would still put Fed and Murray as favorites over Djoko there.
ETA: Djoko is a terrible matchup for Delpo, I don't know how on earth you imagine Delpo could beat him at USO. I disagree with that too.

However Djoker in 2013 has a better chance than most, I'd say around 20%.

I don't see him winning Wimbledon though, I think his victory in 2011 was something of, if not a fluke, than an unrepeatable victory. I think Murray will triumph on home soil in 2013.

I agree, however, the CYGS is NOT his priority...and most likely not his fantasy.
Especially because he sees his chance to grab the RG this year. He openly stated this in Serbian media -- that the RG is his 2013 priority.
I say, he will most likely win the AO (at least in the Finals) and he will grab the RG.
Wimby and USO are up for grabs.
Federer will not get a single slam in 2013