I am against coercion and dogmatic world views, both religious and scientistic.

I am against coercive psychiatry, but not against voluntary psychiatry. I am not a Scientologist.

I am an atheist, but I am not scientistic.

I think facts and values are good to separate in discourse, since it may help people clarify their values without degenerating into arguments over "facts", but that facts ultimately derive from the values of the people who agree on them.

I consider nearly all human behavior a choice, but that doesn't mean it is necessarily right or wrong for any particular circumstance (e.g. addiction or homosexuality being a choice does not imply it is wrong or needs to be changed).