Life in Switzerland is sheltered; no doubt about that.
But in a society or even in a sheltered micro-cosmos like Ticino or Switzerland, infact, it is quite normal that you might have 7 languages at one table.
Again - the more strange it seems to me that the asylum debate on this forum - dominated by Anglo-Saxons i.e. immigrants -
is kind of corrupted by continously stiring up hatred to the weaker position, i.e. the refugees - which, btw., is all but noble (do those have any pride left? What happened to that old stereotype from Robin Hood?).
Not even SVP or Lega have it on their agenda with so much fervour, which, after all, are democratic parties,

much unlike Pegida, FN, Ukip or Vlaams Belang.

There are refugees, and there are migrants.

My wife has had two refugees in her family: her great-grandfather, who came here as a political refugee in the 1860s from what is now Poland (but then Russia), and her ex husband, who came as a Vietnamese boat-person back in the 1970s (albeit, not by boat).

And of course, one migrant (me), but I came here legally, and without pretense.

But the point is, again, that it's strange that people with a migration background and maybe - at least for a certain period of time, in your case in the beginning - foreigners to a certain country,
agitate so much against other migrants and feel themselves somehow more valuable.Very strange, imho, and new for me.

My wife has had two refugees in her family: her great-grandfather, who came here as a political refugee in the 1860s from what is now Poland (but then Russia), and her ex husband, who came as a Vietnamese boat-person back in the 1970s (albeit, not by boat).

And of course, one migrant (me), but I came here legally, and without pretense.

Tom

Don't understand why do you give so many personal details as in front of a judge or something.
He is trolling.

In the UK it is perfectly legal to object to a law, and there is even a defence for directly encouraging law breaking "where the encouragement or assistance is considered to be reasonable in the circumstances the person knew to exist or he reasonably believed to exist".

In the US this is also a protected right under the 1st amendment, and articles 11 and 12 of the EU Charter of Rights gives similar protection for expression of views.

It might please you to do so but the guy keeps pretending he doesn't get why the fuss.
He doesn't get it why not everyone who crosses borders illegally is a refugee until according to the laws of the country he has chosen to settle has gained that status.
He pretends he doesn't get it why crossing borders without documents is illegal.
He pretends he doesn't get it every country has the right to get as many or as little refugees they want, and who they consider to fulfil all their legal criteria.

He intentionally provokes a totally different discussion to stop everyone who has a different opinion than the official one of EU top leaders e.g. Merkel, even when they have all the rights to doubt and question.

Why are you Anglos so much in love with all that Nazi stuff? Strange fetish, imho).

says the guy who says people who want to change laws should be thrown out of the country while extolling some Hitleresque balderdash about "German law says so so it must be true" and that a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech isn't a proper constitution.

Just keep bringing it on.

The following 3 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post:

says the guy who says people who want to change laws should be thrown out of the country while extolling some Hitleresque balderdash about "German law says so so it must be true" and that a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech isn't a proper constitution.

Just keep bringing it on.

In one post he said they should be thrown in Guantanamo... Did he mollify a little?

says the guy who says people who want to change laws should be thrown out of the country while extolling some Hitleresque balderdash about "German law says so so it must be true" and that a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech isn't a proper constitution.
...

If one thinks he can stir hatred towards who is in need, agitate instigation against foreign representatives, does not accept Swiss Constitution and deliberately breaks Swiss law, should be prosecuted, yes, of course.