The article was a cheap hit job. Not a single direct quotation from the alleged anti-Semites (other than a few isolated words and phrases). Furthermore, since Swindle crudely slanders the "infamous anti-Semite Pat Buchanan," and since the "editor" (Swindle himself?) thinks that Horowitz' anti-Paul propaganda piece was a quality analysis, I feel there is no further need for comment on my part. Were you there? Do you have some sort of independent information about this event?

"I'm struck by how emotionally invested you and other Ron Paul supporters are in your candidate. Reminds me of Camping's devotees who went over the cliff for their glorious leader."

Steve, you tried to paint Ron Paul and his supporters as anti-Semites, on the very flimsiest of vague, hearsay evidence, from a blatant propagandist. Shame on you, and you deserve harsh criticism for that.

When all else fails and you've backed yourself into a corner, start punching out some bullet points and dropping ad hominems, right?

Steve, I thought this time was going to be different. I was going to try my darndest to be very courteous in my tone with you in our recent discussions about Ron Paul. But then you had to get all "anti-Semite" on me.

"Steve, I thought this time was going to be different. I was going to try my darndest to be very courteous in my tone with you in our recent discussions about Ron Paul. But then you had to get all 'anti-Semite' on me."

This post wasn't about "Jeff." "Jeff" wasn't a named person in this post. I merely linked to an eyewitness report of an event involving Ron Paul supporters, among others.

The fact that you react in this ink-blot fashion says a lot about your guilt-complex, but nothing about my intentions.