That's the question the internet is asking the singer after her open letter about Apple Music's free trial payment policy prompted the company to make a U-turn.

And now the worldwide star is being bombarded with requests and suggestions of what she could do next - with some even hinting that she should run for president.

One twitter user said: "The next step for Taylor Swift should be to announce that she is running for president".

It has prompted the hashtag #TaylorSwifForPresident to be used.

The Shake It Off singer, 25, said yesterday she would hold back her latest album 1989 from Apple Music in protest at the technology giant's "shocking and disappointing" decision not to pay for songs streamed during a three-month trial period.

It prompted an Apple executive to tweet this morning that the musicians would be paid.

Alison Wenham, from the Worldwide Independent Network which represents the independent music industry, said: " The decision from Apple to pay royalties to rights owners during the proposed three-month trial period is clearly a positive and encouraging step and we welcome the beginning of a fair and equitable relationship between Apple Music and the global independent music sector."

Musicians' Union assistant general secretary Horace Trubridge said it was "unclear" exactly what Apple were proposing. He said: "When they say they will pay are they paying the publishers and records labels so they can pay the artists or are they paying the artists direct?

"Also it's one thing if you are an act like Taylor Swift and have that market share and commercial power, but if you're an act with a major label from the 1970s or 1980s which is where a lot of the streamed music is from, you've probably got a crap contract that does not pay out much for streaming."

Swift said she was making a stand not for herself but for new artists or bands, young songwriters and producers who would not be paid for a quarter of a year's worth of plays.

"These are not the complaints of a spoiled, petulant child," she added. "These are the echoed sentiments of every artist, writer and producer in my social circles who are afraid to speak up publicly because we admire and respect Apple so much. We simply do not respect this particular call.

"I realise that Apple is working towards a goal of paid streaming. I think that is beautiful progress.

Hope Taylor Swift ensures that the next IPhone has a 24 hr battery life.

"We know how astronomically successful Apple has been and we know that this incredible company has the money to pay artists, writers and producers for the three-month trial period, even if it is free for the fans trying it out.

"Three months is a long time to go unpaid, and it is unfair to ask anyone to work for nothing."

When she took her music off Spotify last year Swift argued that the streaming company's ad-supported free service undermines the premium service, which provides higher royalties for songwriters.

Dear Taylor Swift,
Longer battery life in all iPhones.
Regards
The world