While on the Conference Call:To mute your phone: press: 4*To raise you hand for a question or comment: press: 5*

Use this Forum to contact Team Law;use this link for more: contact information.In conjunction with our Success Network We announced our participation in the Self Made Man Conteston our Facebook and Twitter pages.

What is the new Self Made Man platform?It’s kinda like Netflix, but better.The content and platform will help you change your life, and the world…

It launches: February 20thAnd, to celebrate,they’re giving away over $35,000 in cash and prizes!

Jonsonroc:Your inquiry actually poses three questions and several presuppositions; accordingly, we will resolve the presuppositions first.

The first presupposition is your reference to the US dollar. To address that presupposition we first refer you to Myth 22, and second to the Constitution’s provisions for the coining of money followed by the statutory references to the monetary instrument known as the United States Dollar. With that we expect your reference was made to refer to Federal Reserve notes because both the United States Dollar and the silver American Eagle “Dollar”, so defined, are a fixed weight coins (the former consisting of one U.S. ounce of coin silver (90% silver 10% copper) and the latter consisting of one troy ounce of 99.9% pure silver); thus, the only thing you could be referring to that could “collapse” is the presupposed value of the Federal Reserve note (hereinafter “FRN”) defined as a “dollar”. We further assume you are using that term not to refer to the individual FRN but to the collective system valued in terms of its “dollar”.

Accordingly, if you followed our provided reference to Myth 22 and read the respective Prerequisite Knowledge points 3–7, you would realize that FRNs are rented into existence as transaction instruments having no real or actual relative value. Therefore, Obama’s treatment of such instruments as if they were Monopoly (the game) money is not so unrealistic; because they can simply rent more so long as he retains control over the owner of the Federal Reserve Bank System (in accord with Title 22).

Which brings us to your first question: “Is it plausible?”That is like asking if it is possible; so, the answer is obviously: “Yes, it is plausible.”

However, your second question, imbedded in the first, asks: “Is it…imminent?”We do not believe it is “imminent”; too many factors apply to say it is imminent.

Your third question asks us a question we cannot answer because it asks about a thing that has not yet happened. Accordingly, we will refocus our response to that question to address related matters we can answer.Team Law is a self-help educational service. In other words, we help people learn how to learn the law and apply it. Thus, your question would ask if such an education would provide the means for enduring through such a crisis and we have to believe that understanding law and its application from its foundation is the only way a people could possibly survive through and restore civil life through such a crisis. Better still, applying what people learn through their relationship with Team Law provides them with the only respective tools that can prevent such a crisis in the first place.

So, we must say Team Law helps people learn how to both avoid and endure such a crisis and much, much more.

We hope this information is helpful to you.Tell everybody about Team Law!