Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Women were an oppressed class.
They were the silent sufferers of history, claimed as property, relegated to
home, restricted to have jobs and made into a “breeding dog”, an elaborate
system of oppression in the past needs yet to be recognized as such. For this
oppression was total and has been affecting every facet of women’s lives.

Men have controlled all
political, economic and cultural institutions, using their power to keep women
in an inferior position whose only purpose is to enhance men’s lives. Indeed,
all power throughout history has been male-oriented and male dominated
especially in the family.

The power of fathers within
families existed before the formation of Western civilization and was built
into mental constructs, primarily through the influence of the church. Biblical
interpretations based on theological arguments from a male superior group used
core texts of the Bible; namely Genesis, the Fall and St. Paul; to define the
“proper” roles of women. Similarly, according to traditional Hindu custom, a
virtuous woman is considered to be one who worships her husband and derives
great power from her virtue to protect her husband and herself.

For two thousand years, these
teachings which dominated church doctrines, dictated women’s submissiveness and
public silence, and were used to justify subordination. By the Middle Ages, two
main assumptions were regarded as basic truths: women were created inferior and
for a lesser purpose and by their nature and weaknesses, had greater propensity
towards sin and sexual temptations.These dominated all forms of ideas and
controlled sexual, social and economic relationships, constantly reinforcing
gender stereotypes. This is seen by many as the beginning of gender divisions
of labor and occupational segregation, with women positioned in the society as
the producers of children and the roles of housewife.

Not only that, even in sports
women are considered as inferior to men, as observed during the past 100 years,
little girls from birth are most praised not for their actions but for their
appearance. They are made to think that their bodies are solely objects to
attract men. The so-called fact of a woman’s physical weakness has simply been
accepted as common sense. Other scholars have even dismissed the possibility of
women being able to cope up with hard physical labor. Thus it is very
unimaginable at those times for a woman running around a stadium aiming to win
the 100 meter dash and bag in the gold medal.

Worst of all, though things have
changed drastically during the last century, portrayals of women in the media have
only achieved what we can perhaps call as modernity of appearance and
presentation, and not of thought and content. Editorial content and
advertisements in all major newspapers as well as magazines, with exclusive
female readers, reflect negative images of women, a being who is submissive,
frivolous, manipulative, and as decorative objects. In fact, many so-called
women’s magazines promote submissive and docile role models, while discouraging
female characters with independent thoughts as disrespectful and ill mannered.
Women are more often shown in “home-bound” activities such as cooking,
cleaning, knitting and gardening. The way women are presented in the media can
easily be codified in categories such as: a woman dependent on man; an
over-achieving housewife; a high-living femme fatale; as physically beautiful
and sexy.

Such roles persuade women that
their role on the society, regardless of education or aspirations, is only that
of a housewife and making themselves loom beautiful. Continued harmful images
of women are shown to children from the early stages of infancy, they learn to accept
stereotypes – women have limited intellect; they are good for only house bound
activities; they are non-serious and therefore cannot be trusted with
independent decision making as the norm. Indeed, the images of women have not
changed much during the past five decades. The media continues to be male
dominated, manipulated by commercial interests and does much damage through its
portrayal of women as sex objects and as a group that plays secondary roles to
men.

But as they say, no one is
oppressed until one lets herself to be. Therefore, women should not live up to
the image of being weak for by doing this, they are making it a self-fulfilling
prophecy. All moral actions that women do, involve an element of courage, yet
when women are viewed as weak by themselves and others, they expect less of
themselves and less is expected of them. Their actions reflect this, as with
their accomplishments. To gain some freedom, women must overcome their fear of
men and the sense of their own powerlessness.

photo taken from: stylenews.peoplestylewatch.com

Thus, I’m ending this article
with these final words to the women of today:

Gender
inequality only exists when you let it. I have long ago accepted that as a
person, regardless of me being a woman has her own limitations but never let other
people dictate what your limitations are.

Remember,
a woman who measures herself against the achievements of a man lacks ambition.

Embrace
your sexuality. Never be ashamed of it.

“There is only one basic human right, the right as you damn
well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the
consequences.” - - - O'Rourke

awkward. you see them wearing a veil and the first thought that clicks in your mind is- she's oppressed. Instead of digging through insignificant facts and statistics, why not go around and ask a muslim woman herself? It's her choice. Similarly, the way France and other countries have put irrelevant bans on this assuming they're speaking on behalf of these women, yeah right, they feel oppressed for not having the choice to live their lives adorning whatever they wish. I'm a Muslim woman, I live in a "Patriarchal" society, I adorn the veil and hijab... and I love every freaking moment of it. It's not just perspectives. It's my choice to reveal my beauty to whoever I want rather than everyone and to me, that IS liberty. Thank you.