IIt is well known in small cell hives that the Varroa mites go in the active season especially in the drone brood. This is more pronounced than in conventional large cell colonies, which has already been confirmed years ago by my investigations in my small cell hives.

Now I already noticed for some time that drone brood cells and also worker brood cells could be occupied by several Varroa mites, although the number of Varroa mites in the hive was rather low. I did not have an explanation, only assumptions that the inbreeding of the mites would be avoided if there are more than one mite in one brood cell.

Now I learned that this was not correct and the assumption that this is controlled by the bees cannot be contradicted anymore.

I examined recently a very strong hive N ° 3R, which went through the winter on 4 supers and now, at the beginning of February in the almond blossom, already has four brood frames in the second box and two brood frames in the third box. A fully occupied brood comb (Langstroth) of small cell bees has about 7000 brood cells (with large cell only 5500).

However, I saw on this comb 2 brood cells opened by the bees through the hygienic behavior and the holes in the caped brood comb testify some cleaned bee brood cells. In these two opened bee brood cells I found in one a Varroa mite, with also a female offspring and the other had a dead Varroa.

Now came the interesting aspect, the drone brood.
First, I noticed immediately 5 drone brood cells opened by the bees through the hygienic behavior (Harbo has not identified hygienic behavior in the drone brood in his large cell bees):

In these I found the following:

one Varroa with 3 female offspring

one Varroa with 1 female offspring

6 Varroa mites with 2 female offspring

two cells with three Varroa mites and 3 female offspring each.

And in these cells the brood of Varroa mites is interrupted, which is in itself a significant advantage for these small cell bees. I watch this hygienic behavior constantly in the drone brood in my small cell hives.

But now comes the interesting part.
I opened a total of 86 drone brood cells with pupae with purple eyes, which does not happen so often that one has the opportunity to find this so concentrated.

First I found

2 cells, with one Varroa mite and only one male offspring each.

on the other hand I found

One cell with 3 dead Varroa mites and a living male offspring

One cell with a dead Varroa

One cell with two Varroa mites without offspring

One cell with a living and a dead Varroa mite without offspring

This means that these 10 Varroa mites do not propagate.

59 of 86 opended drone brood cells were without mites and in the remaining 21 infected cells I found the following adult Varroas, male offspring and the following:

4 cells with 1 Varroa and 1 female offspring

3 cells with 1 Varroa and 2 female offspring

2 cells with 1 Varroa and 3 female offspring

2 cells with 2 Varroas and 1 female offspring

3 cells with 2 Varroas and 2 female offspring

1 cell with 2 Varroas and 4 female offspring

1 cell with 3 Varroas and 1 female offspring

2 cells with 4 Varroas and 1 female offspring

1 cell with 5 Varroas and 2 female offspring

1 cell with 5 Varroas and 3 female offspring

This means that I found a total of 51 Varroa mites in 86 drone brood cells and only 37 female offspring.

That’s amaizing and you can calculate that the Varroa mites do not represent any more danger to this hive. The Varroa mites focus on the drone brood and those who nevertheless go to the worker brood are allayed.

Now the astonishing thing is the multiple occupation of some drone brood cells by up to 5 Varroa mites.

Evidently is:The more Varroa mites that are in one cell, less female offspring arise per mite.

So if you think logically, then the mites would have to split between the existing drone brood cells to proliferate themselves optimally. But they do not do it. So the assumption appears that multiple occupation is controlled by the bees. This is an assumption that we need to verify by further studies.

So we come back to the question we made at the beginnig:

Does the dronebrood act as a Varroa trap in small cell bees?

——————————————————————————————————————————

second study :

Further and extremely interesting observations of how small-cell bees defend on their own against Varroa mites. This second study shows how fast small cell bees can get the Varroa problem under control, if we give them the necessary prerequisites.

70 drone brood cells of 86 were without mites and in the remaining 9 infected cells I found the following adult Varroa mites, male offspring and the following:

1 cell with one Varroa and one female offspring

2 cells with one Varroa and 2 female offspring

2 cells with 2 Varroas and 1 female offspring

1 cell with 2 Varroas and 2 female offspring

1 cell with 3 Varroas and one female offspring

1 cell with 4 Varroas and one female offspring

1 cell with 4 Varroas and 3 female offspring

This means that I found a total of 38 Varroa mites in the 86 drone brood cells and only 14 female offspring.
Of these 38 Varroa mites there were 14 that did not lay eggs or were dead.

At the last examination, a month ago, there were 51 Varroa mites in the 86 drone brood cells and 37 female offspring
The multiple occupation of Varroa mites in drone brood cells, that I found last time, now increased to 8 in a cell and above all they did not lay eggs at all.

The explanation for this behavior:
It is clear that this is controlled by the Juvenile Growth Hormone JGH in the Royal Jelly of bees. Even Prof Ruttner and Königer mentioned this many years ago and in this book this also been noted already in the 80s:Al Dietz, and Henry Hermann “Biology, Detection and Control of Varroa jacobsoni”: A Parasitic Mite on Honey Bees

Dee Lusby:

It was written early on in the 1980s that researchers were able to show that mite reproduction hinges on the physiological condition of infested honeybee larvae inside a bee cell.Thus, the juvenile hormone titer in the blood of the honeybee prepupa dictates whether the female mite initiates egg laying after the first blood meal. In the Western honeybee, A. mellifera, the blood of both the drone and worker larvae has a relatively high juvenile hormone titer at the time when the cell of the developing larva is capped. In the Esern honey bee, A. cerana, the worker larva has a relatively low hormone titer in the blood at the period of cell capping which is also the period for mite entry into the cell. Since the drone prepupa of A. cerana, however, has its highest blood hormone level at this period, the mite selects it as its host.Now since our European bees for the most part are on artificially enlarged foundation, reducing the foundation to the size equivalent for A. cerana and also original size of feral European races of bees, this step then drastically reduces mites from entering and reproducing in our domesticated european honeybees worker cells, just like with A. cerana worker cells.

And above all the level of JGH in the bee puppae will be reduced by the blood sucking of so many mites, so that the Varroa mites have no more incentive to lay eggs.

The question that still remains:Why ever several Varroa mites go into the same drone brood cell, although it is clear that they can not multiply there?
So we need to investigate further