torsdag 19 november 2015

Turkiet, öppnat dammluckorna till Europa

A Sea Change in the “Refugee” Crisis

- Most American political discussions remain focused on President Obama, and — now that the 2016 campaign is in full swing — the dozen or so major contenders vying to succeed him. All significant events, from petroleum prices through sex scandals to hurricanes, are viewed through the lens of presidential politics. This is the preoccupation not only of the Legacy Media, but also much of the New Media. There has been a drumbeat for the past seven years or so of OBAMA… OBAMA… OBAMA — as if no other public figure were significant. And now there will be a gradual switchover to HILLARY… SANDERS… JEB… TRUMP… CARSON as the next election draws closer, and then after January 20, 2017 the journalistic preoccupation will return to POTUS… POTUS… POTUS, whoever that turns out to be.

This obsessive monomania is a mistake and a waste of energy. Mr. Obama is hardly the cause of our national political disease, but rather a symptom of it — I could go on at length about the “root causes” of Obamaism, but that would be another post entirely.

The same sort of journalistic tunnel vision holds sway in Europe, although it is diffused among a number of political leaders. The European press tends to focus on the pronouncements of Angela Merkel, François Hollande, David Cameron, and other prime ministers and heads of state who appear to occupy the pinnacle of power — as if they were the main architects of crucial public policy and the motive force behind the crucial events of our time.

This is hardly the case. As all the momentous news washes over me, I notice certain eddies and ripple patterns to the tidal ebb and flow of events. Something else is at work besides the capering clowns who strut and fret their hour upon the political stage. It’s hard get a clear view of those occluded causes — they probably include the name “Soros”, but his hand is far from the only one at work.

After digesting a lot of information about the “refugee” crisis over the past four months, these are a few of the facts/deductions that seem important, but not often discussed:

1.
The crisis intensified and accelerated in July and August. At that
point the main route of the migration shifted from {Libya to
Lampedusa} to {Anatolia — to Greek Islands}.

2. The new and more massive flow was possible only because Turkey
decided to let the smugglers’ boats get through. Before that they (the
Turkish police and coast guard) had interdicted most of them. In the
middle of the summer they stopped doing that.

3. The change in Turkish policy
came not long after the first ISIS attack on Turkish soil. My inference
from this is that Turkey decided ISIS was no longer a net plus (the
Turks had previously been tolerating and even supplying ISIS, with their main target being the Kurds). A decision must have been made at the
highest levels to open the floodgates so that the mujahideen would head for Europe, getting them out of Turkey’s hair.

4. A ferry strike
in Greece cut off the flow completely for several days, so that traffic
dried up at the border crossing from Slovenia to Austria almost
immediately. This tells us that it would be easy to stop the refugees, and proves that they are being deliberately imported.

5. Migrants
only walk about five to ten kilometers (three to six miles) during the
trip from Lesbos to Austria, which is about 1,200 kilometers (750 miles)
as the crow flies. The rest of the way they are carried by ferry, train, and bus. They pay nothing, but this is a very expensive trip. SOMEONE is paying for it.

6. Furthermore, when they arrive in
Austria, they pay for purchases with 500 Euro notes. SOMEONE gives them that money. They didn’t find it lying in the bushes in Serbia, or earn
it back home. Not to mention the fact that these poverty-stricken people
managed to cough up a hefty amount to pay the smugglers’ fees.

These
are the dots which I am tentatively connecting. What’s listed here is
much more important than what Angela Merkel says, in my opinion. This is
the realback story.

I’ve
concluded that Turkey’s opening of the floodgatesthrew a spanner into
the works of the NWO’s plan. This was all supposed to happen, but much
more slowly — it was intended to take another five to ten years, at
which point it would have been too late for European indigenes to save
themselves. But the chaos and violence and filth of this huge
instantaneous “migration” have woken up a lot of people who otherwise
would have remained asleep. It’s a game-changer.

I
feel more optimistic about the situation in Europe than I have in a
number of years. What is stirring now began too late to forestall a lot
of ugliness, suffering, and death. But change is coming.

"So Erdogan is up to his neck in this
human smuggling racket. I wonder what his monetary
cut from this scheme
is. He is certainly vigorously
defending it – this Newsweek article from
yesterday
quotes him criticizing any anti-“refugee” sentiment in
Europe
following last Friday’s Paris attacks:

I also wonder why the overwhelming numbers of theseillegal
immigrants are young, healthy and fit males of fighting age – not the
usual cross-section of desperate
refugees fleeing war-torn countries
that you would expect.
A possible explanation (courtesy of Bret Harte in
the
Australian Morning Mail) is the UN resolution of 2000
entitled
“Replacement Migration:Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing
Populations ?”. This resolution
calls for Western nations to “replace”
their own indigenous
populations by (specifically) Muslim migrants,
supposedly
to finance the West’s aging population while at the same time
“freeing” Muslims around the world from their entrenched
misery
overseen by brutal dictators.

What could possibly go wrong? Other than the complete destruction of
the West and the enlightened values it holds
of course. This might also
explain the obstinate determination
by certain European leaders to
ensure this invasion into their
own countries continues.