DVDActive uses cookies to remember your actions, such as your answer in the poll. Cookies are
also used by third-parties for statistics, social media and advertising. By using this website, it is
assumed that you agree to this.

Ocean's Thirteen (UK - DVD R2)

Feature

When Reuben gets cut out of the deal to build a new casino by Willy Bank and falls ill, Danny Ocean returns to Las Vegas to plan a new heist as revenge for what Bank did to his old friend. The Bank is a state-of-the-art casino designed for high rollers so Danny, Rusty, Linus and the gang have to work out how to bring down the casino and make Bank’s investment worthless. Some characters from their past show up along the way, but will they stop Ocean’s thirteen from breaking The Bank?

I’ll be honest up front and say that I haven’t seen Ocean’s Twelve and while I always try not to judge a movie before watching it, knowledge of the Julia Roberts plot twist just makes me want to avoid it. It’s well-known that the first sequel to Ocean’s Eleven was made partly just so George Clooney and his mates could hang out and look cool in Europe. After the relative lack of performance of Twelve, the action has quite rightly moved back to the familiar settings of a Las Vegas casino for Thirteen.

The structure of Ocean’s Thirteen will be instantly familiar to fans of the first in the series, or any other caper movie for that matter. Act one involves a montage of people sitting around talking and clips of action to get as much exposition out of the way early on. Act two is when the problems arise and our heroes have to adapt to these complications and act three is the heist. There are some jokes dotted around but in a nutshell, that’s pretty much it for the structure. If you wanted character development, you’ve come to the wrong place I’m afraid. This isn’t a story about people coming to terms with their feelings and the lack of involvement by any female ‘good guys’ is explained only by the throwaway line ‘it’s not their fight’.

The only relationship that approaches something deeper than looking cool while exchanging witty banter is with the introduction of Linus’ father and the moment of them together is a welcome addition, albeit a brief one. The main problem I found with Ocean’s Thirteen is the fact that because there’s hardly any character development and the plot is so intricately constructed, no one in Ocean’s team ever really looks like they’re having any difficulty with the job, no matter what problems may arise. Everyone always seems to have a plan B or clever editing has led us to believe something else was going to happen, but from beginning to end the good guys are in complete control. As a result, there are hardly any real thrills to be had because unlike Ocean’s Eleven, you never get the feeling that anyone’s life is in danger.

There is still some fun to be had here though. As ever, Danny and Rusty continue to operate as one mind in two bodies and their lines are written as if it is one person talking to himself. There is more of an indication of a code of conduct among thieves and Vegas wise guys in this movie, with the oft-used line ‘you shook Sinatra’s hand’. The Oprah scene and the Mexico storyline are odd additions but while they don’t seem to fit in with what you expect from an Ocean’s movie, they are certainly enjoyable. The movie looks great too, with Soderbergh blending montage, dissolves, split-screen and tracking shots to ensure that even though it may not be the most exciting movie of 2007, it’s certainly a feast for the eyeballs.

Given the Las Vegas setting and very similar storyline, Ocean’s Thirteen could almost be described as a re-imagining of Soderbergh’s first movie in the series with the same cast. It’s a case of if-it-ain’t-broke-don’t-fix-it filmmaking that returns to familiar territory after the series was almost broken for some fans with Ocean’s Twelve. This means that while the whole thing is incredibly familiar and danger-free, it’s a fairly enjoyable ride while it lasts but you’ll be reaching for Ocean’s Eleven before watching this for a second time.

Video

Ocean’s Thirteen is presented with a 2.40:1 anamorphic picture and as I stated further up the page, it’s a good-looking movie. It’s very colourful throughout, with some scenes bathed in red light, some in green light but most with the gold tint that casinos use to keep you hooked. The picture has large patches of colour and darkness at times and there is a little grain and fuzziness at times, but nothing too detrimental to your viewing pleasure.

Audio

Music plays a large part in Ocean’s Thirteen, whether it’s the cool, laid-back theme that plays over the colourful producer credits at the beginning that has the air of Lalo Schifrin’s score for Bullitt, or the punchy background music that keeps the action moving along. The 5.1 surround track showcases David Holmes’ music very well, with the sounds of the casino sometimes taking a backseat. For this reason, it would have been great to have an isolated music track. This means that there’s not always a huge amount going on in the surround speakers but I can’t really fault the quality of what’s there on the soundtrack.

Extras

The disc opens with a trailer for the HD formats, then trailers for The Good German and No Reservations. ‘Vegas: An Opulent Illusion’ is probably the only thing that qualifies as a highlight in this lean set of extras as it documents the history of Las Vegas and follows the city’s constant reinvention, including interviews with casino owners. ‘Jerry Weintraub Walk and Talk’ is two and a half minutes of the producer walking around the casino set and is pretty much a total waste of time. Interestingly, the deleted scenes are called ‘Additional Scenes’ and are a small collection of extended and deleted scenes that would have been better if they’d come with a director’s commentary. It’s worth noting that the high definition releases of Ocean’s Thirteen come with a commentary track and a proper making-of featurette, which is surely the first sign that the studios are just beginning to turn their backs on standard DVD.

Overall

Ocean’s Thirteen is good fun while it lasts, but feels like more of the same rather than the latest chapter in a progressive series. The movie looks and sounds good on this release but the cynically poky set of extras on this standard definition release is a dark omen for future releases by Warner Bros and other studios as they ramp up their HD catalogue.

Advertisements

Comments

Reply

Message

Enter the message here then press submit. The username, password and message are required. Please make the message constructive, you are fully responsible for the legality of anything you contribute. Terms & conditions apply.

I'm an Ocean's Trilogy fan so I love it. I like the whole idea of bringing back that lost art of being a gentleman (i.e. "Shaking Sinatra's hand," etc.) I think that's what attracts me to the trilogy. It's daring in it's unwavering sense of cool retro and throwback.

Just watched this today. Good stuff, light ad fluffy entertainment from a great cast who are experts at doing this kind of stuff. Not as good as #1 (the plan was very messy and chaotic here I thought)but open to a re-watch more than (the still pretty enjoyable) #2.

I'm glad you pointed out the lack of threat to anyone's life in this latest entry to the series. Because of the desire to give every member of the time roughly equal screentime, Al Pacino sadly got much less than he deserved, as well as less than was needed to make his character suitably threatening. That aside, this was one of the more entertaining films of the summer for me, and of the sequels that were released this year, among the best. I admit, that's perhaps not saying a lot though.

I like 12. But I wasn't so sure on first viewing. I came to appreciate it more when I viewed 11 as a heist film and 12 as more of a con film. I am a 12 apologist.

11 was inclusive of the audience giving them enough to feel like they knew what was going on. 12 on the other hand seemed to go out of its way to alienate the audience and the entire film ended not only conning the 'villain' of the piece but also the viewer.

Understandably, that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, since then any discussions/reviews of the films have, more often than not predictably described 12 as terrible/dire/awful/confusing and/or indulgent. Or all of the above. I agree with the confusing and indulgent parts but have to disagree that 12 is a terrible/dire piece of cinema.

As the middle part of a trilogy, I'm glad it's there, sitting in the middle and it's a good thing (IMO) that it's suitably different in style and appraoch to 11 and 13.