nmm 22 4500ICPSR02930MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02930MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1940
[electronic resource]Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2930NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1940 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02930.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2930Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02930.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02931MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02931MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1950
[electronic resource]Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2931NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1950 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02931.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2931Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02931.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02932MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02932MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1960
[electronic resource] Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2932NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1960 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02932.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2932Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02932.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02933MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02933MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1970
[electronic resource] Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2933NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1970 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02933.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesICPSR I.A. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United StatesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2933Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02933.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35578MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35578MiAaIMiAaI
Community Indicators Survey [1999-2002]
[electronic resource]
Knight Foundation
2015-03-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35578NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Community Indicators project is a research-based initiative that is part of the Knight Foundation's ongoing effort to learn more about the 26 communities it serves through its grant-making. To document changes in the quality of life in its communities, the foundation tracks a few key indicators over time. The project focuses on aspects of community life related to the six grant-making areas that are the priority of the Knight Community Partners Program. The Knight Community Partners Program prefers to make grants in the following six priority areas: education; the well-being of children and families; housing and community development; economic development; civic engagement and positive human relations; and the vitality of cultural life. The foundation expected to update both the community surveys and the community profiles approximately every three years.
Local area surveys were conducted in each of the 26 communities in both 1999 and 2002. In 2002, a number of the local area surveys were supplemented with regional surveys or surveys of a neighboring city. The 26 local areas surveyed in 1999 were: Milledgeville, GA; Long Beach, CA; Gary, IN; Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), FL; Boulder, CO; Philadelphia, PA; Akron, OH; Macon, GA; Columbus, GA; Aberdeen, SD; Grand Forks, ND; Wichita, KS; Charlotte, NC; Columbia, SC; Myrtle Beach, SC; Tallahassee, FL; Duluth, MN; St. Paul, MN; State College, PA; Fort Wayne, IN; Biloxi, MS; Detroit, MI; Lexington, KY; San Jose, CA; Bradenton, FL; Miami, FL. For 2002, the 11 regional and neighboring city areas also surveyed were: Charlotte, NC - Regional; Columbus, SC - Second City; Detroit, MI - Regional; Duluth, MN - Second City; Gary, IN - Regional; Grand Forks, SD - Second City; Lexington, KY - Regional; Philadelphia, PA - Regional; Philadelphia, PA - Second City, and Miami - Dade, FL and Miami - Broward, FL in place of Miami, FL. National surveys were also conducted in order to provide comparative benchmark measures. The surveys measured citizens' civic engagement and attitudes concerning seven topic areas: education, arts and culture, children and social welfare, community development, homelessness, literacy, and citizenship. Questions relating specifically to arts and culture include frequency of attendance at arts events or museums and satisfaction with arts and cultural opportunities.
The study was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates and funded by the Knight Foundation. In 1999, 17,417 telephone interviews were conducted from February 10 through December 1. In 2002, 21,722 telephone interviews were conducted from January 2 through October 3.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35578.v1
artsicpsrarts attendanceicpsrarts audiencesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrconcertsicpsrmuseumsicpsrperforming artsicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrNADAC XI. Venues and Cultural FacilitiesNADAC IX. Participation in Arts and Leisure ActivitiesNADAC I. National Archive of Data on Arts and CultureNADAC X. Public Attitudes and Arts AdvocacyICPSR XVII.F. Social Institutions and Behavior, Leisure and RecreationKnight FoundationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35578Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35578.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00025MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00025MiAaIMiAaI
Comparative Study of Community Decision-Making
[electronic resource]
Terry N. Clark
2008-03-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR25NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data for 51 communities with
populations of 50,000-750,000 in 22 states of the United States
on the characteristics of community leadership, decision-making,
and patterns of influence, as well as political, economic, and
demographic composition of the communities and per capita
expenditures for various common community functions. Information
regarding general political and public policy issues, specific
municipal problems, and their solutions was obtained from
interviews with eight prominent individuals in each city,
such as the Chamber of Commerce president, a labor leader,
a leading newspaper editor or publisher, the chairmen of the
Democratic and Republican parties, the president of the largest
bank, and the mayor. Data are also provided on the characteristics
of the cities, including composite indexes created from the
interview data as well as data from other sources. The study is
composed of three files: a Merged Aggregate and Individual file
(Part 1), an Aggregate file (Part 2), and an Individual file (Part 3).
The Merged Aggregate and Individual file (Part 1) contains
the responses of the individuals interviewed and information on
the characteristics of each respondent's city from other sources.
Items include education, health, culture, welfare, and total
expenditures of the city. The Aggregate file (Part 2) contains
information on the population characteristics of each city, as well
as information on the structure, income, and expenditures of the city
government. Demographic indices describe age and income distribution
of the population, racial composition, level of educational attainment,
and the size, income and occupational distribution of the labor force.
The Individual file (Part 3) provides information received from
respondents on decision-making pertaining to issues of urban
renewal, mayoral elections, air pollution control, race relations,
health, education, industrial and economic development, and
anti-poverty programs.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00025.v1
citiesicpsrcommunitiesicpsrcommunity decision makingicpsrcommunity elitesicpsrcommunity leadersicpsrcommunity participationicpsrleadershipicpsrlocal politicsicpsrmunicipalitiesicpsrpolitical influenceicpsrpublic policyicpsrICPSR II.A.1. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, United StatesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsClark, Terry N.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00025.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34912MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34912MiAaIMiAaI
Ohio Statewide Household Travel Survey, 2001-2003
[electronic resource]
Jesse Casas
2014-08-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34912NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2001-2003 Ohio Statewide Household Travel Survey is a comprehensive study of the demographic and average weekday, local and regional personal travel made by residents of Ohio. This survey entailed the collection of activity and travel information for all household members. The survey relied on the willingness of regional households to (1) provide demographic information about the household, its members and its vehicles and (2) have all household members record all travel and activity for the travel period, including address information for all locations visited, trip purpose, mode, and travel times. Demographic information includes age, gender, valid driver's license, occupation, student status, number of people in the household, and household income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34912.v1
vehiclesicpsrworkicpsrworking hoursicpsrautomobile useicpsrautomobilesicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrdriving habitsicpsrhouseholdsicpsrlicensesicpsrpublic transportationicpsrschoolsicpsrtrafficicpsrtravelicpsrICPSR VII. Geography and EnvironmentCasas, JesseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34912Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34912.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35532MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150802s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35532MiAaIMiAaI
Soul of the Community [in 26 Knight Foundation Communities in the United States], 2008-2010
[electronic resource]
Gallup, Inc.
2014-12-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35532NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-08-02.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Soul of the Community was a three-year study conducted by Gallup, Inc. of the 26 Knight Foundation communities across the United States to determine the factors that attach residents to their communities and the role of community attachment in an area's economic growth and well-being. The study focused on the emotional side of the connection between residents and their communities. A random sample of at least 400 residents, aged 18 years and older, was interviewed in each community each year. In each year, oversampling obtained additional interviews in selected areas. The 2010 study also included 200 interviews among residents aged 18 to 34 in eight resident communities. Once a household within the identified area was reached, Gallup randomly selected one adult within the sampled household. Telephone interviews lasted 15 minutes (approximately 18 minutes in 2009). In 2010, the survey was available in English and Spanish, and both landlines and cell phones were called. Data include demographics, geographic information, ratings of the community, and information about the economy and work, personal wellness, and community involvement.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35532.v1
community participationicpsrcultural diversityicpsreconomic growthicpsrperforming artsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrschoolsicpsraccess to artsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrsocial identityicpsrNADAC VII. Economics of Art and CultureICPSR XVII.F. Social Institutions and Behavior, Leisure and RecreationNADAC IX. Participation in Arts and Leisure ActivitiesNADAC I. National Archive of Data on Arts and CultureGallup, Inc.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35532Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35532.v1