This
support has pivoted on the struggles of luminaries such as BR Ambedkar, Jyotiba
Phule and Savitribai Phule, acknowledging one’s own caste (and therefore
oppressor) status, and admitting that Dalit-Bahujan people face the worst caste
violence, and hence, they should lead the struggle.

However,
you are the first to point out the “problems” of upper caste people when they
deign to support people like us – how we don’t welcome the support with open
arms, how we’re wary of the sudden love after centuries of oppression and how
we’re gagging the “powerful” – though I’m not sure how that’s a bad thing, even
if true.

You
begin with an account of how caste came to be – “there is no oppression in the
world, only hierarchy” – a controversial and oft-discredited theory of the French
anthropologist, Louis Dumont.

You
say, “Hierarchies are inescapable and eternal… any attempt to overturn the
prevailing hierarchy will only create chaos and end up creating just another
hierarchy”.

I’m
not sure how to read that statement other than an endorsement of the violent
caste system, with you saying that any attempt at an equal and just society is
bound to fail.

Ground realities

Caste
activists aren’t trying to upend the order, they’re trying to demolish it –
creating a society where individuals and communities aren’t discriminated and
killed based on their birth and choices, where access to resources is just and
equitable, and where freedoms aren’t curtailed based on appearance. If this
isn’t reconcilable with your hierarchies, then so be it.

You
further go on to talk about how we’re reading caste wrong – as a violation of
the social contract, instead of “inevitable” hierarchy. This again, is
familiar: reducing the real-life struggles of millions of people to an
“epistemological” problem. Not that there isn’t a wealth of lower caste
literature on caste, but none of that paints it as inevitable or says that if
one can’t handle hierarchy, one needs to step out.

You
say we haven’t understood caste – as if the thousands of people who are dying
as a result of the system don’t comprehend it better than you and I – because
of free speech and political correctness.

But
you then reduce free speech to your apparent right to hold forth on caste,
complaining how people like us are stopping you from your god-given (or is it
birth) right to educate the oppressed on caste.

I’m
sorry to disappoint but there is no such right, though that hasn’t stopped
dominant caste scholars from silencing lower caste voices and crowding them out
of voicing their own oppression.

Unlike
your assertion, members of privileged communities can speak about caste but we
only ask them to foreground the oppression meted out by their brethren to
millions of people over centuries who have had limited access to health, education,
social resources and wealth.

Pushed to the margins

One
cannot explain caste, one can only condemn it – condemn it for stripping people
of basic human dignity, of killing men, women and children, of violently
suppressing struggles and disenfranchising everyone except a handful of
privileged caste Hindus.

Accusing
an upper caste person of appropriating the movement comes from this memory of
silencing and discrimination, where scholars have examined caste without
examining their own privileges and complicity in the oppression.

Despite
the wealth of lower caste literature, Dalit Bahujan academics find it difficult
to exist in universities and are seldom published. Our much-beloved shops rarely
stock any books by lower caste persons, and we don’t acknowledge their
contribution.

Unlike
your statement, millions of lower caste people are taking back Hinduism from
the violence of upper caste traditions, re-imagining the epics and festivals,
and asserting our right to public and religious spaces.

The
death of Rohith Vemula has seen a surge of support, but most of these tend to put their own statements and justifications front and centre, instead of focusing on the powerfullife and struggle of the student. It is
no accident that much of this self-righteous assertion comes from upper caste
scholars and academics trying to use the movement to again crowd out lower
caste voices. This is what we are against. –Dhrubo Jyoti

***

Dear
Mr Pattanaik,

I
am not sorry to say that your piece is rather silly and banal in its outlook,
and obviously in its content. You have viewed the problems of casteism from a
delusional standpoint and tried to appear liberal. Attempting to introduce your
article with hints of drawing a genealogy is completely moronic.

I
hope when you wrote about the first side of story, where culture is a contract,
you have possibly tried to talk about the Social Contract Theory, propagated by
Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. If that is what you have tried to talk about,
please read those texts again. Firstly, they say nothing about what you have
written. Secondly, there are several criticisms of the theory too, thus making
it redundant in a way. Kindly update yourself. The point is not that the breach
in the contract leads to oppression, but that the mere existence of the
contract causes the oppression.

In
your shallow paragraph laden with hopes of a revolution, you have tried to put
across your revolutionary, Marxist outlook. But trust me, anyone who has read Karl
Marx could figure out the shallowness and lack of knowledge. You merely repeated
certain words, which even a child who reads a little of the newspaper or
listens to elders can say. It is true that the revolution will come and at any
given time and era, a revolution is needed. But will you wait for one and help
your hierarchical system, as you belong to that category?

You
mentioned a revolution inspired by messiah or messenger of god. Why did you
need to include the rational scientific leader, if messiahs are here? If you
have also read world history other than Hindu texts, then you should know that
revolutions in the world have always been brought or initiated by either the
workers, labourers, or the people from lower strata of the society (read
oppressed), or the students - never by a messiah. Are you trying to say that
the birth of Christianity and Islam were revolutions?

World of hierarchy

I
agree that Hinduism and capitalism work on the basis of hierarchy. But if
hierarchy is “inescapable and eternal,” then conflict and resistance
will always be inescapable and eternal against this very existence of hierarchy.
As long as there is hierarchy, there will be conflict. Then why did you say
that hierarchy is inevitable, thus hinting that we, the people of India should
agree with it? Why not at least attempt to resist it?

You
said: “Any attempt to overturn the prevailing hierarchy will only create
chaos and end up creating just another hierarchy. Hierarchies are inescapable
and eternal. Those who cannot handle the hierarchy need to step out,
either physically like an indifferent monk, or psychologically, like a detached
yet engaged household.”

I
somewhat agree with the first sentence. Why not have an entirely different
hierarchy, where the upper castes for a change switch roles with the lower
caste? For several centuries, upper castes have enjoyed superiority over the
rest. Let the opposite side enjoy those fruits that have been denied to them
since time immemorial. They are the base of the society, upon which the
superstructure of upper caste can comfortably dwell. Let for once let the upper
caste people go down to the bottom, do all the laborious, scavenging jobs and
struggle for once just to survive with dignity.

And
can you please explain what you meant when you said that “those who cannot
handle it should step out”? Are you trying to say like Rohith Vemula, they all
should die? What if we neither step out, nor get to grips with the hierarchical
system?

I
agree that the caste system is borne out of your second story of hierarchy. But
aren’t you too committing the same mistake you are accusing us of:
understanding football with the logic of cricket? I don’t think caste can be
explained in any other way other than a hierarchical system, which perpetrates
only violence in the name of maintaining law and order. It is nothing but an
oppressive and exploitative system. But I can surely see from where you have
drawn your inspiration, which clearly lays bare your ideological leanings.

Speaking out

Also,
free speech was never created to give voice to the opposition. Do you seriously
not know the history of the world? There is a subtle difference between “free
speech” and “free flow of information and communication”. Free
speech is a right, given to us by our Constitution, which says that any citizen
of India (definitely not just the upper caste and class) has the right to voice
their thoughts and opinions, provided the public order is maintained.

What
you have written in your article is basically the second thing: free flow of
communication, which definitely is not made for opposition, but for the
powerful to grasp even more power as they have more capital to invest.

Meanwhile,
the lower strata will lose themselves in just finding a niche amidst all other
powerful people, who dominate the communication field by the virtue of owning a
lot more privileges and capital to sustain it.

Our
current government is only interested in disciplining the people of India
(Read: lower caste and class, and the minority) and not encouraging them much
(indirectly) to have an access to education or a career.

The
government is only curbing the original and unique intellect of students so
that this kind of protest (chaos, as you called it) should never happen
anywhere. The more you people will try to discipline us, the more we will
create chaos, until and unless you realise and understand the inherent
discipline amidst the chaos.

Till
date, very few people have spoken properly about caste. Ambedkar could do so
long ago. One needs to understand caste fully and then talk. It is only then
that the problem will be clearer.

Let
me tell you in short what caste is. Caste is an epidemic; it only kills, is
vast and the sufferer dies with no control over the situation at all. The caste
system is based on nothing else but exploitation and oppression. It is
disgraceful and is devoid of anything to do with humanity. And there can be
only one reason to study or understand caste, which is how to demolish the
entire system from its very roots. It needs to be killed, not nurtured.

And
before I take your leave, your prescription on understanding caste is wrong as
you have wrongly diagnosed the disease. –Ankhi Mukherjee

The right machine can save water, power consumption, time, energy and your clothes from damage.

In 2010, Han Rosling, a Swedish statistician, convinced a room full of people that the washing machine was the greatest invention of the industrial revolution. In the TED talk delivered by him, he illuminates how the washing machine freed women from doing hours of labour intensive laundry, giving them the time to read books and eventually join the labour force. Rosling’s argument rings true even today as it is difficult to deny the significance of the washing machine in our everyday lives.

For many households, buying a washing machine is a sizable investment. Oddly, buyers underestimate the importance of the decision-making process while buying one and don’t research the purchase as much as they would for a television or refrigerator. Most buyers limit their buying criteria to type, size and price of the washing machine.

Visible technological advancements can be seen all around us, making it fair to expect a lot more from household appliances, especially washing machines. Here are a few features to expect and look out for before investing in a washing machine:

Cover your basics

Do you wash your towels every day? How frequently do you do your laundry? Are you okay with a bit of manual intervention during the wash cycle? These questions will help filter the basic type of washing machine you need. The semi-automatics require manual intervention to move clothes from the washing tub to the drying tub and are priced lower than a fully-automatic. A fully-automatic comes in two types: front load and top load. Front loading machines use less water by rotating the inner drum and using gravity to move the clothes through water.

Simple steps to get the best from your washing machineSimple steps to get the best from your washing machineSimple steps to get the best from your washing machine

Size matters

The size or the capacity of the machine is directly proportional to the consumption of electricity. The right machine capacity depends on the daily requirement of the household. For instance, for couples or individuals, a 6kg capacity would be adequate whereas a family of four might need an 8 kg or bigger capacity for their laundry needs. This is an important factor to consider since the wrong decision can consume an unnecessary amount of electricity.

Machine intelligence that helps save time

In situations when time works against you and your laundry, features of a well-designed washing machine can come to rescue. There are programmes for urgent laundry needs that provide clean laundry in a super quick 15 to 30 minutes’ cycle; a time delay feature that can assist you to start the laundry at a desired time etc. Many of these features dispel the notion that longer wash cycles mean cleaner clothes. In fact, some washing machines come with pre-activated wash cycles that offer shortest wash cycles across all programmes without compromising on cleanliness.

The green quotient

Despite the conveniences washing machines offer, many of them also consume a substantial amount of electricity and water. By paying close attention to performance features, it’s possible to find washing machines that use less water and energy. For example, there are machines which can adjust the levels of water used based on the size of the load. The reduced water usage, in turn, helps reduce the usage of electricity. Further, machines that promise a silent, no-vibration wash don’t just reduce noise – they are also more efficient as they are designed to work with less friction, thus reducing the energy consumed.

Customisable washing modes

Crushed dresses, out-of-shape shirts and shrunken sweaters are stuff of laundry nightmares. Most of us would rather take out the time to hand wash our expensive items of clothing rather than trusting the washing machine. To get the dirt out of clothes, washing machines use speed to first agitate the clothes and spin the water out of them, a process that takes a toll on the fabric. Fortunately, advanced machines come equipped with washing modes that control speed and water temperature depending on the fabric. While jeans and towels can endure a high-speed tumble and spin action, delicate fabrics like silk need a gentler wash at low speeds. Some machines also have a monsoon mode. This is an India specific mode that gives clothes a hot rinse and spin to reduce drying time during monsoons. A super clean mode will use hot water to clean the clothes deeply.

Washing machines have come a long way, from a wooden drum powered by motor to high-tech machines that come equipped with automatic washing modes. Bosch washing machines include all the above-mentioned features and provide damage free laundry in an energy efficient way. With 32 different washing modes, Bosch washing machines can create custom wash cycles for different types of laundry, be it lightly soiled linens, or stained woollens. The ActiveWater feature in Bosch washing machines senses the laundry load and optimises the usage of water and electricity. Its EcoSilentDrive motor draws energy from a permanent magnet, thereby saving energy and giving a silent wash. The fear of expensive clothes being wringed to shapelessness in a washing machine is a common one. The video below explains how Bosch’s unique VarioDrumTM technology achieves damage free laundry.