Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Anonymous User wrote:WilmerHale's dings are pretty harsh. One email (post-screener) said that the hiring committee had met and decided that my qualifications do not merit further interviews and another email (from mass-mail) said that my qualifications don't meet their needs.

It's certainly better than the "despite your impressive credentials...... We are sure you will succeed in your future endeavors" shit that some firms are shoveling

Allow me to express my sincerest surprise that Stephen Arcano enjoyed meeting me. I am not sure whether I went temporarily blind in one eye or have perhaps suffered serious brain trauma, but I wanted to thank you for alerting me to these possibilities as I have absolutely no memory of Mr. Arcano actually being present at my interview. As I am certain an institution as venerable as yours would never be so sloppily callous as to forgot whether a given interviewer was actually present, I can only conclude that I must be suffering from a serious neurological condition for which I am seeking immediate help.

Thanks for making me go to lunch with a creepy associate who was completely incapable of making conversation. It was a pleasure. And thanks for forgetting my deadline and making me chase you down for an answer.

Thanks for making me go to lunch with a creepy associate who was completely incapable of making conversation. It was a pleasure. And thanks for forgetting my deadline and making me chase you down for an answer.

Thanks for making me go to lunch with a creepy associate who was completely incapable of making conversation. It was a pleasure. And thanks for forgetting my deadline and making me chase you down for an answer.

The two above demonstrate the ugly side or this forum / the anonymous part of the internet.

I was the anon above and I only said "chasing them down" to sound humorous. It was just a polite reminder. And why is it so necessary to call out perceived "anon abuse"? Perhaps there are circumstances you don't know about for which using my username might lead to unwanted consequences. Surely, there are better ways to spend one's time.

All I was trying to do was contribute an amusing anecdote to this board for people's entertainment. Lesson learned.

Anonymous User wrote:The two above demonstrate the ugly side or this forum / the anonymous part of the internet.

I was the anon above and I only said "chasing them down" to sound humorous. It was just a polite reminder. And why is it so necessary to call out perceived "anon abuse"? Perhaps there are circumstances you don't know about for which using my username might lead to unwanted consequences. Surely, there are better ways to spend one's time.

All I was trying to do was contribute an amusing anecdote to this board for people's entertainment. Lesson learned.

Anonymous User wrote:The two above demonstrate the ugly side or this forum / the anonymous part of the internet.

I was the anon above and I only said "chasing them down" to sound humorous. It was just a polite reminder. And why is it so necessary to call out perceived "anon abuse"? Perhaps there are circumstances you don't know about for which using my username might lead to unwanted consequences. Surely, there are better ways to spend one's time.

All I was trying to do was contribute an amusing anecdote to this board for people's entertainment. Lesson learned.

I was calling out the dude for posting anon for the sole purpose of insulting.

Eat sh$@, all of you. 18 screener interviews with only one CB/ding? That's the best you can do? With feedback from multiple partners that I interview well and have great softs, but my grades are just outside the minimum cutoff? Why would you screen me if there was never a chance in hell?

I guess it was a bad idea to ask that partner if he had a life outside of work. His telling me that he had successfully "schedule[d]" dinner at home with his wife that evening was very comforting. So much so that the rejection email that almost beat my plane home did not sting so bad. I always knew your firm attracted quick people.

Thanks for reminding me that I'm not getting a callback. Even though I might not be good enough to work for you, I am smart enough to realize that silence from my late August interview meant that I was not getting a callback. Thanks for the reminder e-mail though, I can rest easy.

I'm not sure which is the more surprising aspect of receiving your self-ID questionnaire: the fact that I have already been rejected by you, or the fact that I have already filled out this form for you. Either way, get your act together.