You Are Reading

We, the undersigned, are graphic designers, art directors and visual communicators who have been raised in a world in which the techniques and apparatus of advertising have persistently been presented to us as the most lucrative, effective and desirable use of our talents. Many design teachers and mentors promote this belief; the market rewards it; a tide of books and publications reinforces it.

It was less than a manifesto in a political sense, but in the way it’s been signed by Art Directors, designers, etc.

It’s a call for designers to do something more with their talents, rather than trying to sell cat food.

Proposing a reversal of priorities, it’s unethical to waste talent in pointless endeavours.

Replaced by the First things First Manifesto 2000, by Adbusters. - A redraft, with a changed tone, more critical, more venomous, giving Advertising more stick.

Who talk about sabotaging Maddy D’s, spoof advertising - a journal of the metal environment.

The techniques and apparatus of advertising, picking out advertising as a capitalist system.

Nike - Just Make it Adbusters Ad.

Encouraged in this direction, designers then apply their skill and imagination to sell dog biscuits, designer coffee, diamonds, detergents, hair gel, cigarettes, credit cards, sneakers, butt toners, light beer and heavy-duty recreational vehicles. Commercial work has always paid the bills, but many graphic designers have now let it become, in large measure, what graphic designers do. This, in turn, is how the world perceives design. The profession’s time and energy is used up manufacturing demand for things that are inessential at best.

They talk about Graphic Design and Advertising as the same thing - we’re all together manufacturing demand for rubbish.

Encouraging people to be locked into a consumer system.

Many of us have grown increasingly uncomfortable with this view of design. Designers who devote their efforts primarily to advertising, marketing and brand development are supporting, and implicitly endorsing, a mental environment so saturated with commercial messages that it is changing the very way citizen-consumers speak, think, feel, respond and interact

You’re effecting the way people think about each other, interact with each other, and themselves - negatively.

This might be the case, but how do we judge that worthy, the tone becomes extremely dictatorial. Almost preachy.

We propose a reversal of priorities in favour of more useful, lasting and democratic forms of communication – a mindshift away from product marketing and toward the exploration and production of a new kind of meaning. The scope of debate is shrinking; it must expand. Consumerism is running uncontested; it must be challenged by other perspectives expressed, in part, through the visual languages and resources of design.

If you work, to market advertise or brand companies, or make any sort of consumer items - you’re being unethical, perpetuating consumerism, which is ruining the world. You should be using your talents to smash capitalism and start a revolution. - Hijacking billboard, culture jamming.

In 1964, 22 visual communicators signed the original call for our skills to be put to worthwhile use. With the explosive growth of global commercial culture, their message has only grown more urgent. Today, we renew their manifesto in expectation that no more decades will pass before it is taken to heart.

Some people who signed the manifesto had plenty of money - it’s easy to be ethical when you have the luxury of choice. Up and coming designers who need money will not have this choice.

Adbusters & Culture Jamming

Detournement

Culture Jamming / Meme Warfare Adbusters& Kalle Lasn

“A meme (rhymes with dream) is a unit of information (a catchphrase, a concept, a tune, a belief) that leaps from brain to brain to brain. Memes compete with one another for replication, and are passed down through a population much the same way genes pass through a species.Potent memes can change minds, alter behavior, catalyze collectivemindshifts, and transform cultures.Which is why meme warfare has become the geopolitical battle of our information age. Whoever has the memes has the power.”

Victor Papanek

Most things are designed not for the needs of the people but for the needs of manufacturers to sell to people’ (Papanek, 1983:46)

Most design was wasteful, exploitative, and actually harmed the world, making it worse.

People are ignoring design solutions for the interest of profit.

How do we determine what is Good?

Ethical Theories

Subjective Relativism

There are no universal moral norms of right and wrong

All persons decide right and wrong for themselves

Cultural Relativism

The ethical theory that what’s right or wrong depends on place and/or time

Divine Command Theory

Good actions are aligned with the will of God

Bad actions are contrary to the will of God

The holy book helps make the decisions

Kantianism

Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) a German philosopher

People’s wills should be based on moral rules

Therefore it’s important that our actions are based on appropriate moral rules.

To determine when a moral rule is appropriate Kant proposed two Categorical Imperatives

Two Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

Act only from moral rules that you can at the same time universalise

–If you act on a moral rule that would cause problems if everyone followed it then your actions are not moral

Act so that you always treat both yourself and other people as ends in themselves, and never only as a means to an end.

–If you use people for your own benefit that is not moral

Utilitarianism (John Stuart Mill)

Principle of Utility (Also known as Greatest Happiness Principle)

An action is right to the extent that it increasesthe total happiness of the affected parties

An action is wrong to the extent that it decreases the total happiness of the affected parties.

Happiness may have many definitions such as: advantage, benefit, good, or pleasure

Rules are based on the Principle of Utility

A rule is right to the extent that it increasesthe total happiness of the affected parties

The Greatest Happiness Principleis applied to moral rules

Similar to Kantianism – both pertain to rules

But Kantianism uses the Categorical Imperative to decide which rules to follow

Social Contract Theory

Thomas Hobbes (1603-1679) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)

An agreement between individuals held together by common interest

Avoids society degenerating into the ‘state of nature’ or the ‘war of all against all’ (Hobbes)

“Morality consists in the set of rules, governing how people are to treat one another, that rational people will agree to accept, for their mutual benefit, on the condition that others follow those rules as well.”

We trade some of our liberty for a stable society.

Morality vs. Legal

Are all legal acts also moral?

Difficult to determine because many immoral acts are not addressed by the law

Are all illegal acts immoral?

Social Contract Theory: Yes, we are obligated to follow the law

Kantianism: Yes, by the two Categorical Imperatives

Rule Utilitarianism: Yes, because rules are broken

Act Utilitarianism: Depends on the situation. Sometimes more good comes from breaking a law.

Toolbox of Moral / Ethical Theories

Whether presented with problems that are easy or difficult to solve, the four workable ethical theories,

Kantianism

Act Utilitarianism

Rule Utilitarianism

Social Contract Theory

could provide us with possible solutions to many of the problems that are raised by the ‘First Things First’ manifesto.

Criteria for a Workable Ethical Theory?

Moral decisions and rules:

Based on logical reasoning

Come from facts and commonly held or shared values

Culturally neutral

Treat everyone equally

Socially and Ecologically Responsible Design

Victor Papanek

‘Most things are designed not for the needs of the people but for the needs of manufacturers to sell to people’ (Papanek, 1983:46)

What does Possession mean to you?

The assets of the worlds top three billionaires are greater than those of the poorest 600 million on the planet

More than a third of the worlds population (2.8 billion)live on less than two dollars a day

1.2 billion live on less than one dollar a day

In 2002 34.6 million Americans lived below the official poverty line (8.5 million of those had jobs!) Black American Poverty double that of whites