I've basically proposed that as the brain's cells are activated, they emit neutrinos which "writes" a snapshot of neural activity unto dark matter,
effectively using dark matter like a giant storage system (your "diary") which can be re-accessed.

In my view this is an area in which too little data is available to permit the drawing of any conclusions at all.

Have at it, by all means; may your researches prosper. That very scarcity of data opens a wide field for hypothesizing. You may hit upon the right
conclusion; then again, we’d have to be shown.

When I started at university, the first question they asked us was ‘do you want to be a theoretical physicist, or an experimental one?’ I’m
guessing you’re with the theoretical tendency. But it might be worth your while, from time to time, to try to devise — not necessarily carry out,
somebody else may be persuaded to do that — practical means by which your hypotheses can be verified. Concepts and even maths are all very well, but
the gold standard is always, in science, empirical.

Peer reviewed papers is one of the causes of mainstream science being stuck where it is — denying that a life force exists.

Please
name the scientist or scientists who deny a life force exists.

Science doesn't work that way, in the same way science can't prove God doesn't exist. If a supernatural entity like God or some kind of supernatural
life force exist, and operate outside of natural laws then how is science which measures natural laws going to measure God or this supernatural life
force?

Swanson diligently cites all of the source literature. He is also careful to note areas where instrumentation is not yet capable of capturing the
information

Saying "instrumentation is not yet capable of capturing the information" is a euphemism for "lack of evidence".

Free-thinking, independent researchers have to write books to get their findings published.

So do people promoting completely
speculative ideas that don't have a shred of evidence supporting them. If an idea sounds too far fetched to believe, stick the word "quantum" in front
of it, that apparently makes anything believable to the naive.

Just because scientists can't prove there isn't a flying spaghetti monster, doesn't mean there is one. There could be I guess, but how likely is it?
About as likely as a lot of that stuff Rupert Sheldrake made up being true, not very. Now a quantum flying spaghetti monster, that's a different
story, since the word "quantum" implies anything is possible, because a lot of charlatans said so.

Well, the points you have been making in this thread are based on the assumption souls exist.

Yes I believe the soul exists

To one who does not make that assumption, your arguments are meaningless.

Yes my beliefs are meaningless to you... I have no problem with that being so

Since it is in your interest to convince us that you are right, I should think you’d want to convince us that souls exist.

Why would it be in my interest to convince you that my beliefs are true
You are mistaken if you thinkI want to convince you of the souls existence

If you don’t care either way, it suggests that you don’t really believe your own arguments.

It is you who does not believe me
I am not here to argue with you or try to convince any my beliefs are true for them
That would be a form of indoctrination
You have free choice to believe me or not and you have already stated your choice
By saying You do not believe in soul ... I do

You will not force my hand for the sake of petty arguement

My Belief is based on the open minded consideration of ideas and mental verification
Each are different in the way they come to understanding

And matter is transformed by energy also energy is affected by matter
The denser the matter the slower energy passes through it yet on passing through it returns to the same original impetus

In other words energy is slowed down by matter but returns to the speed when it has passed through

I believe there is a Universal "energy" that permeates everything
As such we are part of that energy or reality
Our link to reality is through thought ... thought transforms matter

Yet energy is not the be all and end all of all that is
There is another ingrediant I call Intelligence
Energy is power yet energy/power alone can be a destructive force if not tempered with Intelligence

I've basically proposed that as the brain's cells are activated, they emit neutrinos which "writes" a snapshot of neural activity unto dark matter,
effectively using dark matter like a giant storage system (your "diary") which can be re-accessed.

From: synchronizeduniverse.com...
"His Ph.D. thesis at Princeton was done in the 'Gravity Group,' which focuses on experimental cosmology and astronomy, and was headed by Dr. Robert
Dicke. His thesis advisor was Prof. David Wilkinson, who later became chairman of the physics department."

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.