EDITORIAL: Are Your Dollars Supporting Gun Bans?

A quarter-million new National Rifle Association members in a month. Guns and ammo flying off the shelves. High capacity magazines selling so fast that manufacturer backorder times stretch out for years out and carry prices that are just as ludicrous. It’s apparent that gun owners will not go gently into any good night. Perhaps Uncle Ted summed up the sentiment best at SHOT Show 2013: “I believe the celebration of American families buying more ammo and firepower in the last 30 days than ever before in history is an undeniable statement that we will not take this lying down.”

Though I full-heartedly agree with Nugent, I’m a top down kind of gal and with the fabric of the Second Amendment in dire need of protecting, I often wonder what more we gun owners can do with our paychecks besides just buying up gear or donating it to gun rights advocacy groups? The fact is, individual gun owners can answer those who want to curtail our Second Amendment rights—either passively or directly—by becoming aware of where their dollars go and tailoring their spending practices accordingly.

While the NRA has a long list of companies, organizations, celebrities, journalists and media outlets with “anti-gun policies,” Jim Scoutten, a famed TV personality in the shooting industry, is the one most recently raising awareness of “The Economics of Gun Control.”

The public has a right to know

Since the tragic events in Newtown, Connecticut, the public, celebrities and corporate entities have responded with emotional, knee-jerk reactions by establishing or supporting gun-free zones at public places, pitching dollars to gun-control causes and/or suppressing the sale of firearms and firearm related goods and services. Whether they know or realize it, they’re hurting gun rights. While some like Wal-Mart or Dick’s Sporting Goods make public announcements, other companies implement gun control stances surreptitiously.

Jim Scoutten asks those willing to print this flier, tape it up next to a sign that reads “Gun Free Zone”, snap a picture of it and then email it along with the name and address of the establishment to him.

Most recently, news broke about Groupon, the daily online coupon dealer of all things imaginable, has suspended sales of all gun-related “groupons,” including those for discounted concealed carry and gun safety classes.

Similarly, it has just surfaced that Buffalo Wild Wings has established itself as gun-free zone. Outrage among the chain-restaurant’s fans is obvious on their Facebook page, with many promising boycotts pending policy changes.

These tax-paying companies’ have the right to implement whatever policies they so desire and support whatever causes they fancy, but I would remind everyone involved that it is a citizen’s right to protest these policies with their words and wallet. Scoutten has on his website, Scoutten’s Shooting USA, a page dedicated to making the feelings of second amendment supporters known to business owners who feel otherwise. On the site Scoutten makes available business cards and fliers stating “No guns, no money,” and encourages those interested to distribute the material to the businesses with anti-gun policies. Going one step further, Scoutten asks you to notate and photograph these establishments, and then submit them to him via email for his album (which Guns.com assumes he’ll make available to the public).

What about the NRA’s list?

While parts of the NRA list may be out-of-date, incomplete, or not entirely accurate, it is however a valid and valuable jumping off point for those interested in knowing where the money and support goes. However, responsible consumers, like responsible gun owners, should do their own research into a companies’ history before organizing or performing any boycotts.

It is also important to note that many of the companies on NRA’s list are parents to countless other brand holdings like Sara Lee’s control of Hillshire Farms, Ball Park Franks and many others.

According the Examiner, Sara Lee’s “foundation named Sarah Brady one of its “Frontrunners” in 1997 and awarded her $50,000 for her “humanitarian” work.”

Rounding out the long NRA-ILA list of disappointing corporate names are several NFL and MLB teams (best read the list if you root for teams in St. Louis and Kansas City).

Sylvester Stallone, who looks terrific for a 66-year-old by the way, aims a sunshine ray in the film “Bullet to the Head.”

On the same list are celebrities and national figures who the NRA says “have lent their name and notoriety to anti-gun causes, speaking out for anti-gun legislation and providing a voice for anti-gun organizations.”

Thought actor and director of the newly released action film “Bullet to the Head” Sylvester Stallone had your back when it came to gun rights? Guess again. He has very openly voiced anti-gun sentiments. While living in the UK years ago, and in response to the shooting death of Phil Hartman in 1999, Stallone was shown on Access Hollywood saying, “Until America, door to door, takes every handgun, this is what you’re gonna have. It’s pathetic. It really is pathetic. It’s sad. We’re living in the Dark Ages over there.” That’s much less Rambo, and way more Rosie O’Donnell.

Conclusion

Each and every one of us have worthwhile a voice, legally owned and treasured guns, and a pocketbook to do the talking. While my few dollars or your solitary voice is negligible, the combined influence of responsible gun owners around the country will not go unnoticed. Furthermore, it is our duty to act in whatever reasonable ways available and readjusting your weekly grocery bill to reflect a pro gun attitude is an excellent start because sends the message that policies affect profits – just look at what happened to the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show.

Post your Comments

What the gun owners in this Country need's is a complete list of the manufacturers, retailers, celebrities, food chains, and the many charitable organizations who donate or are sympathetic to the anti-gun cause. With this list the many million citizens who are the gun owning segment of this Country, could decide on what businesses, movies, food chains, retailers and charities we wish to spend our billions of dollars in. If at any point in the history of this Great Country, this is the time when the gun owners and those believer's in the Constitution and just as important, the Second Amendment, band together to form a force more imposing then ever thought of by the antis. With the N.R.A. picking up over a QUARTER OF A MILLION NEW MEMBERS is the last couple of months show that even the people who may not have believed in the total idealistic views of the NRA have resigned themselves to the fact that they had to join this group to save our Right to Bear Arms. It's a shame that we have to organize to protect our Constitution's original concept set forth by the Forefathers of our Nation. Over the course of our history, millions of total lives in uniform have been lost to protect the Constitution of Our Country, now is the time the knowing have to step up to correct the wrong doing, the uneducated and the brainwashed citizens and agenda ridden politicians of this Great Country have tried to do. Unite, Believer's of the Second Amendment!

Personally I'd rather businesses take the Starbucks approach and not give a fuck. It's arbitrary to single out a chain for the simple fact that they're usually locally owned and often to be a gun free zone is a decision made by the owner, not the company. Granted the company does have a say because it's their brand. But, I also think you're gonna have a hard life if you run it that politically. It's like trying not to buy products made in China.

Voting with your dollar sends a powerful message. Be sure to let the company know. I also avoid buying from companies in states that do not support freedom. Cut off the funding for them and it will be more difficult to continue with this nonsense.

Mitch, We're not referring to the right to carry. This list will tell all of America who is pouring money into the politicians who are in favor of banning firearms. We want to know the companies, organizations, celebrities who support gun control, and charities that are sometimes collecting monies for supposedly one thing,
then sponsoring another agenda with those funds. A lot of time those agendas have to do with banning firearms.

That's what I'm talking about. The NRA already has a list and it's a joke. A lot of it sounds like hearsay. If they don't update or monitor it this list they have, meaning the people who are dead or the organizations that no longer exist, my guess is they aren't really putting that much effort in it. Probably for the simple fact that it's damn near impossible to maintain. Just be conscious of where you're going in your area.