Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Patients with small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) have chronic intestinal and extraintestinal symptomatology which adversely affects their quality of life. Present treatment of SIBO is limited to oral antibiotics with variable success. A growing number of patients are interested in using complementary and alternative therapies for their gastrointestinal health. The objective was to determine the remission rate of SIBO using either the antibiotic rifaximin or herbals in a tertiary care referral gastroenterology practice.

RESULTS:

Three hundred ninety-six patients underwent LBT for suspected SIBO, of which 251 (63.4%) were positive 165 underwent treatment and 104 had a follow-up LBT. Of the 37 patients who received herbal therapy, 17 (46%) had a negative follow-up LBT compared to 23/67 (34%) of rifaximin users (P=.24). The odds ratio of having a negative LBT after taking herbal therapy as compared to rifaximin was 1.85 (CI=0.77-4.41, P=.17) once adjusted for age, gender, SIBO risk factors and IBS status. Fourteen of the 44 (31.8%) rifaximin non-responders were offered herbal rescue therapy, with 8 of the 14 (57.1%) having a negative LBT after completing the rescue herbal therapy, while 10 non-responders were offered triple antibiotics with 6 responding (60%, P=.89). Adverse effects were reported among the rifaximin treated arm including 1 case of anaphylaxis, 2 cases of hives, 2 cases of diarrhea and 1 case of Clostridium difficile. Only one case of diarrhea was reported in the herbal therapy arm, which did not reach statistical significance (P=.22).

CONCLUSION:

SIBO is widely prevalent in a tertiary referral gastroenterology practice. Herbal therapies are at least as effective as rifaximin for resolution of SIBO by LBT. Herbals also appear to be as effective as triple antibiotic therapy for SIBO rescue therapy for rifaximin non-responders. Further, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and explore additional alternative therapies in patients with refractory SIBO.

Flow chart of the study design: 397 patients were recruited to participate in the study and underwent lactulose breath hydrogen testing (LBT), 252 were found to be LBT positive while 145 were negative. Due to lack of protocol adherence, only 104 of those who were had positive LBT met our inclusion criteria for the study, with 67 opting for Rifaximin therapy and 37 preferring herbals. Forty-four of the 67 (65.7%) subjects treated with Rifaximin failed to respond and had positive LBT after therapy with only 34.3% responding. Herbal therapies were associated with a (17/37) 45.9% response rate with (20/37) 54.1% having post-treatment positive LBT. For those who failed the first round of Rifaximin therapy, a crossover trial showed a 8/14 (57.1%) response rate for herbals in those who failed Rifaximin.