Kurt has argued cases before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the California Supreme Court, and the Third District Court of Appeals. He has also represented a client before the United States Supreme Court, as well as in administrative hearings, arbitrations (single and panel), writ proceedings, jury trials, and bench trials.

Ramsey v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, et al.: Represented Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and their agents in class action defense regarding alleged contractual and tort claims arising from alleged misrepresentations and concealments in connection with the sale and marketing of the life insurance policies and a dividend reduction scheme.

Reego v. La-Z-Boy: Represented the licensor in connection with the dispute over licensing agreements.

Reiser v. Marriott: Represented defendants in action brought by 38 plaintiffs alleging conversion of certain units of a condominium located in Truckee, CA into private condominiums caused their ownership interests to decline in value and become unmarketable. Claims for Recission, Breach of Contract, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, UCL, Aiding and Abetting.

Reyes v. Bank of America, et al.: Represented the client in a class action case involving violation of TILA, which was later dismissed.

Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London: Represented the client in a coverage action arising out of $35 million in claims.

Salvesen v. La-Z-Boy, Inc. et al: Plaintiff sought to allow Salvesen to remain in business and prevent La-Z-Boy from terminating Retail License Agreements between the parties for operation of four Southern California furniture galleries. Alleged breach of contract, violation of franchise laws, and related claims.

Schneider v. DMV: Represented Schneider in an action against the Department of Motor Vehicles to enforce compliance with the International Registration Plan under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.

Spencer v. Easterday/Amsan: Represented the tenant in a dispute with the commercial landlord related to lease default issues, and pursuance of counterclaims for various claims including fraud, unfair business practices, and breach of agreement.

Urata v. Esquire: Represented the former owner of a 22-story building in a case alleging construction defects.

UFCW v. WinCo: Represented the client in a case involving Business & Professionals Code Sections 17200 and 17500 action against the grocery store chain, alleging the sale of adulterated food to consumers. The case was dismissed with prejudice.

3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company v. ACS Industries, Inc. (U.S. District Court of Minnesota): Represented 3M in action for misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition and tortious interference against a competitor.

Nicole Wilson; Rosetta Stone LTD v. Open English LLC: Represented Open English in a multi-jurisdiction trade secret case (Florida and California) including a California declaratory relief claim under a non-compete agreement.

Stephanie Allen; Rosetta Stone LTD v. Open English LLC: Represented Open English in a multi-jurisdiction trade secret case (Florida and California) including a California declaratory relief claim under a non-compete agreement.