Monday, April 6, 2009

While the Disease Management Care Blog has previously opined on the option of a Federally funded public payor multiple times, Uwe Reinhardt has jumped into the debate over at the New York Times’ Economix blog. Here's a short version for you:

While Americans give government-run health insurance high marks, special interests are sharpening their battle axes in opposition to the idea. Private insurers fear having to compete against lower prices and hidden subsidies. Health care providers fear having to deal with an all powerful payor. Both private insurers and health care providers will fight back by stoking fears of ‘rationing.’ Professor Reinhardt confides he has a solution that will bring peace and prosperity across the land. Unfortunately, it is a ‘secret until a future post.’

It may also be wrong. The DMCB thinks that may be the case because Professor Reinhardt’s assumptions about the providers and insurers are mistaken:

According to this survey by Deloitte, the majority of persons with any health insurance are satisfied with their current plan. There is little evidence that persons with employer based insurance would welcome a government program or vice versa. Rather, persons who cannot afford health insurance would probably welcome any insurance, public or private.

Last but not least, Professor Reinhardt ignores the role of population-based care programs. Will a Federally funded public payor provide disease management options for patients that need it? The DMCB and the CBO think that’s a good idea. Will private insurers use care management programs to compete against a public plan that neglects that option? The DMCB thinks they should. Will the public plan work with provider-based patient centered medical homes? The DMCB thinks that’s an important option. Can the leverage of other care providers such as nurses that coach patients to be better stewards of their health reduce the likelihood of having to ration health care? The DMCB says the answer is yes at many levels.

In the meantime, the DMCB likes this idea from Kevin MD courtesy of Maggie Mahar’s Health Beat Blog: we’ll know how well a public payor option is working by the percent of physicians that accept it. When the DMCB finally gets to see Professor Reinhardt’s secret, it will use the likelihood of physician acceptance as a gauge of its likely success. It will also look critically at how well it would accommodate intelligently designed care management programs.

Here's the User Interface

The PHB & Twitter

LinkedIn

Some more....

Proud to be....

PHB Peer Reviewed Publications:

PHB on Twitter!

Why Should I Read the PHB?

Here's what one reader had to say about the Population Health Blog's ability to to go beyond simple headlines and mainstream newsfeeds:

"This past week, I was surprised to read some of the generic headlines summarizing the VA readmission study. You know, through medical newsfeeds, they almost implied that length of stay didn't have anything to do w/readmissions. When I read the Annals article today, there was certainly a lot more to the study than that. Was happy to see your nice summary, which I agree w/100%. Just wanted to drop you a line to say that Ilooked at your blog w/hopes of finding some commentary on the study---and there it was!"

Not Exactly A Waste Of Time.....

Subscribe To The PHB

This is still true, by the way.....

“Moving into the next century, the most important breakthroughs will be in the from of clinical process innovation rather than clinical product improvement…the next big advances in health care will be the development of protocols for delivering patient care across health care settings over time.”

JD Kleinke, Bleeding Edge

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Vox audita perit, litteras scripta manet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Do Aetna, Humana or UnitedHealth Insurance Cover It? Find Out Here

About Jaan Sidorov MD, MHSA, FACP

While his web persona has been described as a "blogvocateur," Dr. Sidorov has wide range of knowledge about the medical home, condition management, population-based health care and managed care that is only exceeded by his modesty. He has been quoted by the Wall Street Journal, Consumer Reports and NPR’s All Things Considered.
He has over 20 years experience in primary care, disease management and population based care coordination. He is a primary care general internist and former Medical Director at Geisinger Health Plan.
He is primary care by training, managed care by experience and population-based care strategies by disposition.
The contents of this blog reflect only the opinions of Sidorov and should not be interpreted to have anything to do with any current or past employers, clients, customers, friends, acquaintances or enemies, personal, professional, foreign or domestic. This is also not intended to function as medical advice. If you really need that, work with a personal physician or call 911 for crying out loud.
Jaan can be reached at jaansATaolDOTcom.