Archive for February, 2018

UPITEC is a registered not for profit organization in the State of Idaho, and AIAS was brought into being by the Alpha Foundation in 1998. They are hugely successful, and the voluntary staff have worked very hard for many years to bring about this success. So they are the equivalent of a Charitable Trust, although not formalized as yet.

This Section will be the start of a new phase of ECE theory in which cosmology is based on the same vacuum fluctuation theory as Lamb shift theory. It is obviously important to try to get precise agreement with experimental data, and this method can gradually be extended to other phenomena. Resonance can also be worked in to the theory, there is very intense current interest in UFT399.

This looks similar as I am preparing for UFT 401. Will finish the section the next days.

Horst

Am 20.02.2018 um 11:11 schrieb Myron Evans:

The mean square vacuum fluctuation responsible for a precessing planar orbit is given by Eq. (16), in which the orbital velocity v for small precessions is given by the Newtonian (17). The angular frequency of fluctuations for any planar orbit is given by Eq. (19). These results are a straightforward result of the relativistic Newton equation (1) used with the ECE2 force equation (3). The orbital precession is obtained as in UFT377 by numerical integration of Eq. (1) with given initial conditions. This theory can be used with any coordinates system. This calculation is to second order in the tensorial Taylor series as in UFT401. The aim is to use this theory to obtain complete agreement with experimental data.

Posted in asott2 | Comments Off on 402(4): The Vacuum Fluctuations for a Precessing Planar Orbit

This is very interesting and important in my opinion. It indicates some kind of universal symmetry, and is an elegant explanation of all precessions, going well beyond the standard model.
Date: Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Comments on Note 402(4)
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

I am preparing section 3 of paper 401. I found that forward/retrograde pressession depends on the sign of the spin connection in the case I investigated this.

Horst

Am 20.02.2018 um 14:39 schrieb Myron Evans:

In this note the theory of precessing orbits is worked out without any adjustables, the origin of precession is shown to be vacuum fluctuations and the relativistic Newton force equation is used with the ECE2 force equation. Initial conditions must be chosen as in UFT377. The spin connection determines the mean square vacuum fluctuation. The theory uses a central force law but a non central force law may result in a different kind of precession. It is also possible to apply higher order terms of the tensor Taylor series. The theory conserves energy and momentum. In the classical limit there is no precession and no spin connection. The mean square fluctuation vanishes and there is no aether. Newton clearly did not consider an aether. Relativistic momentum originates in conservation of momentum, so the relativistic Newtron equation conserves momentum. The theory can be used in any coordinates system and is very simple in essence. I(n a letter to Bentley Newton dismissed action at a distance and considered the vacuum to be a nothingness. "Pray do not ascribe that notion (of action at a distance) to me " and so on.

In this note the theory of precessing orbits is worked out without any adjustables, the origin of precession is shown to be vacuum fluctuations and the relativistic Newton force equation is used with the ECE2 force equation. Initial conditions must be chosen as in UFT377. The spin connection determines the mean square vacuum fluctuation. The theory uses a central force law but a non central force law may result in a different kind of precession. It is also possible to apply higher order terms of the tensor Taylor series. The theory conserves energy and momentum. In the classical limit there is no precession and no spin connection. The mean square fluctuation vanishes and there is no aether. Newton clearly did not consider an aether. Relativistic momentum originates in conservation of momentum, so the relativistic Newton equation conserves momentum. The theory can be used in any coordinates system and is very simple in essence. In a letter to Bentley, Newton dismissed action at a distance and considered the vacuum to be a nothingness. “Pray do not ascribe that notion (of action at a distance) to me ” and so on.

Many thanks, I also think that Lagrange-Hamilton dynamics are very important, as can be seen from paper 396 where it was possible to derive hitherto unknown gyro effects.

Horst

Am 19.02.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Myron Evans:

The really important advance is the integration of this equation, irrespective of any argument concerning the Lagrange Hamilton dynamics. I think that your discovery of retrograde precession from this equation is a brilliant one, and can be developed in many ways. The Lagrange Hamilton dynamics are of course of central importance to modern physics.

Posted in asott2 | Comments Off on PS Integration of the Relativistc Newton Equation

The mean square vacuum fluctuation responsible for a precessing planar orbit is given by Eq. (16), in which the orbital velocity v for small precessions is given by the Newtonian (17). The angular frequency of fluctuations for any planar orbit is given by Eq. (19). These results are a straightforward result of the relativistic Newton equation (1) used with the ECE2 force equation (3). The orbital precession is obtained as in UFT377 by numerical integration of Eq. (1) with given initial conditions. This theory can be used with any coordinates system. This calculation is to second order in the tensorial Taylor series as in UFT401. The aim is to use this theory to obtain complete agreement with experimental data.

This Eq. (6.151) of Marion and Thornton, third edition. the term as introduced in Kelvin and Tait, "Natural Philosophy" (1867). It is the origin of the Lagrange equations of motion, and also the origin of the relativistic lagrangian. The relativistic momentum as used by Einstein is derived from the conservation of momentum. Horst has found that the relativistic Newtonian force, the time derivative of the relativistic momentum, gives retrograde precession, a major discovery because EGR fails to give retrograde precession.

The really important advance is the integration of this equation, irrespective of any argument concerning the Lagrange Hamilton dynamics. I think that your discovery of retrograde precession from this equation is a brilliant one, and can be developed in many ways. The Lagrange Hamilton dynamics are of course of central importance to modern physics.

Posted in asott2 | Comments Off on PS Integration of the Relativistic Newton Equation