Imho, these particular agencies are only the agencies we Know about to some degree...the public ones...if you agree that means we have even more spies! We have Government Hackers (we seem to hear more about the chinese hackers than the US hackers)..we have all kinds of other non government hackers...agents, double agents! maybe a few triple agents !

We have a Drone society on the horizon...Spying is a growth industry!

We have nano "smart dust"

we have RFID chips

Electronic tattoo anyone?

It is in the nature of Governments to Spy, and under the current paradigm, everyone is a potential threat, so governments want to be all pervasive and all knowing in "real time"> qualities usually associated with a supreme being.

You can now be viewed as information > you are what/who you know,where you go, what you buy, what you "like" etc. etc. all of this creates your real time profile...

my current feeling about all these "reveals" about spying is that it is the marketing campaign for the "big brother" effect...big brother is watching you ala 1984.. " Next > well of course we are spying on you > to "protect you" is the next level of the program ~!~

Fair Use Declaration

FAIR USE NOTICE. The Website may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. In such a case we are making the material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on the Website is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlUnited States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.htmlNotwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include – (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.United States Code: Title 17, Section 106 Chapter 1 – Subject Matter And Scope of Copyright http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/106.html

Subject to sections 107 through 120, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

A look into a possible GMO future ~!~ Let's say the current science and technology driven movement towards patentable life forms (FOOD) continues it's current pace .... what kind of strange new world could we be moving into? We are all used to seeing those online "license Agreements" we have to check the box on when we use some corporations software or social networking site, agreeing to terms and conditions etc., etc....btw, anybody reading these legal agreements?

Ok, let's expand that to food like corn, and transgenic salmon, and new Foods made from various plant and animal species...and imagine that we are a little further down the tech-path where every item in your store is informationally smart, it could be the added nano sized networked chips, whatever ... and before you open your GMO product you have to scan it with say your smartphone and Agree to the terms and conditions (use your imagination here) before you can legally consume this patented food.

or maybe you have to pay a yearly license fee to consume this corporation's food.

Once food is property with a legal patent on it where does it stop?

My answer would be that Food of any kind, should be Open source...sounds like software does it not ?

If you read tomorrow that Bill gates now owns CORN ? enough ?

should a human consume enough GMO property/food without a valid license until say 50.1% of the genetic material in their digestive system is "GMO" derived could said person or their gut then become the property of a corporation ? Or even further down the road your baby is born full of patented property or genes?

Is this a lawsuit against the farmer today that has GMO in his fields even though he did not plant it and a possible future lawsuit against the consumer tomorrow for illegal consumption even if he did not intend to eat GMO ?

Fair Use Declaration

FAIR USE NOTICE. The Website may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. In such a case we are making the material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on the Website is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlUnited States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.htmlNotwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include – (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.United States Code: Title 17, Section 106 Chapter 1 – Subject Matter And Scope of Copyright http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/106.html

Subject to sections 107 through 120, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.

Did Humans create God in their own conscious image ? Did a GOD or Gods create Humans in His/her/there own image?

Does human consciousness imply the realization of a higher state of being, of conscious evolution ? Is God the Personification of this principle ?

Humans became conscious of self and no one can prove exactly when this happened. No one can prove that there was a time when the earth did not have at least one conscious human living on or under it's surface.Or on other planets, other galaxies, or in other dimensions.

Humans have ascribed all of their qualities to God in greater quantity than those ascribed to Themselves

Sometimes they created many Gods instead of one God.

Some Gods have Eternal female Consorts, Others are Male, and still others are Female.

Humans made God perfect

Humans derived Laws from these GOD/GODS

Humans worship different Gods and continue to kill each other based on religion.

Some Humans say there is no God

Some Humans say the Earth or Nature is a God or the Sun is God.

Other humans say we Humans are all One or the God

Some Humans say the entire Cosmos is God

Some humans say God is within, others say God is within and without

Some humans say God is within every atom and every particle.

Some Humans say God is light.

Some humans say that everything is conscious and that a Human is just one form of this all pervasive consciousness

Some Humans say consciousness results from a big bang

How does a GOD become an ancient GOD?

How do The GODS become the OLD GODS?

How did the new Gods become the new Gods?

Fair Use Declaration

FAIR USE NOTICE. The Website may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. In such a case we are making the material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on the Website is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlUnited States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.htmlNotwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include – (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.United States Code: Title 17, Section 106 Chapter 1 – Subject Matter And Scope of Copyright http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/106.html

Subject to sections 107 through 120, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.