The Federalist Party Essay examples

If I was a citizen in the United States of America back in 1790, I would want to be part of the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was created by Alexander Hamilton, and his party wants a strong central government in America with power given to the wealthy and political leaders. The only other party back then was the justly named Anti-Federalist party. The Anti-Federalist party was started by Thomas Jefferson and this party had completely opposite views to the Federalists. Anti-Federalists focused on power among the individual states, as opposed to having a powerful central government. I would rather be a part of the Federalist Party because I agree with their decisions on the Bank of the United States, future American economy, changes…show more content…

By focusing loans to the wealthy, they would create cheaper products for the lower classes. Cheaper products for the lower classes would result in less money being used, yet more products being sold. This cycle would increase the power of the U.S. dollar resulting in a more powerful nation all together. In addition to that, they would instate an import tax on foreign products in order to protect American businesses. For example, if a citizen wanted to buy a car, the American car would probably end up being cheaper and Italian car because there is a tax on the foreign vehicle. However, the Anti-Federalists would spend money on common people, which I disagree with. One of the biggest issues back then was whether or not to abandon the Articles of Confederation and ratify the Constitution. The Constitution would unify the American people and create a government which could actually govern the nation to an effective extent. Under the Articles, the government had little to none useful governing power. Federalists wanted to change that and therefore, created our Constitution which would actually give the government the power to tax, pass laws, and enforce those laws. Of course, Anti-Federalists saw the Constitution as a danger to American liberty and opposed it in favor of the Articles of Confederation. I would side with the Federalists yet again because the ratification would create a cohesive unified

Related Documents

37 through 85.) These books were titled simply The
Federalist.” (Coenen)
Since this new government needed some explanation Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay set out to clarify what the intent was. “Just as the delegates regarded democracy with varying degrees of enthusiasm, so too did they differ in their understanding of the meaning and character of the very structures of government they were creating.” (Beeman)
Through out the years many have wondered what was the intent of the framers of the constitution…

These parties are organized by Republicans and Democrats. The Republican Party was formed in 1854 by former members of the “Whig Democratic” and “Free Soil” parties who chose the party’s name to recall the Jeffersonian Republican’s concern with the national interest. The Republican Party is a more conservative while Democrats are more liberal. The Democratic Party was formed in 1790 as a group of Thomas Jefferson’s supporters. They demonstrated their beliefs in the principle of popular government…

that help out the government in the area of
execution of foreign powers.
The view of the anti-federalists were obviously different. They believed
that the power given to the congress was not safe since it put them too much in
control. Hence they created the Bill of Rights to "establish justice, ensure domestic
tranquillity and provide for the common defense..." The anti-federalists feared that the
actual people would not be fairly represented by their new government since they would…

the foreign vehicle. However, the Anti-Federalists would spend money on common people, which I disagree with.
One of the biggest issues back then was whether or not to abandon the Articles of Confederation and ratify the Constitution. The Constitution would unify the American people and create a government which could actually govern the nation to an effective extent. Under the Articles, the government had little to none useful governing power. Federalists wanted to change that and therefore, created…

with other members of the same social groups, ideals, and goals, no particular group should be able to become so strong as to thwart the interest of all other groups.
Factions had been further discussed in Federalist No. 10.
Two summaries of the Federalist papers No. 10 and No. 51.
The Federalist No. 10
James Madison starts of this paper by saying that the strong Constitution has the control to deal with violence and aggression caused by factions. Madison says these factions do not help those in…

classes. This means that aristocrats that own large expanses of land and hard laborers who own small estates should have the same amount of power in government. The Anti-Federalists believed that the representatives should represent all men, including the men of the lesser classes. In Brutus Essay II it is apparent that the Anti-Federalists see the need for representatives to show diversity. It states “If we may collect the sentiments of the people of America… they hold this truth as self-evident, that…

FEDERALIST #10
This paper is considered an important document in American history for it lays out how the writers of the constitution defined the form of government that would protect minority rights from organized and united factions that intended to pass legislation injurious to the liberty of the minority or detrimental to the good of the country.
The Federalist Papers, were a series of eighty five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison between October 1787 and…

Again Federalists and Democratic- Republicans would clash on this issue, furthering the divide between the two ideologies. Hamilton believed that high tariffs would entice people to buy from American industries rather than foreign goods, which were excessively cheap, due to government subsidies of business over seas. The issue would soon be debated between the northern and southern congressmen. The north favored such tariffs because their economy was based on manufacturing and they had to compete…

“The Labour Party is the party of devolution.” Is this a reasonable statement to make?
Devolution is defined as “the transfer of power to a lower level, especially by central government to local or regional administrations” (oxforddictionaries.com). It can also be defined as “the transfer of power from a superior sovereign to a subordinate parliament or assembly.” (Tonge 2010). Within a devolved state, the sovereign power retains the technical power to suspend the devolved government. Since Labour…

assumed power, they are more easily tracked through party structures and well-publicized platforms. Global evidence suggests that the stability of two-party systems is even more profound than is reflected in the electoral or domestic policy arena. Two party states are less likely to experience revolutions, coups, or civil wars (Spiritus-Temporis). Recent research approaches this question somewhat differently, asking whether the number of parties is really the most important variable; instead,…