He loves and she loves

Just Causes

Password required

June 19, 2008

"Lest thou forget the things which thine eyes have seen"

Finely tuned in to her surroundings, Tiny triangulates outside in the yard this morning. Note right ear curved back towards the house, keeping track of any comings or goings of interest, left ear cocked towards the camerawoman's "watch-the-birdie" cat whisperings, and muzzle facing south for information cues blowing her way off the Creek.

"A child born today receives as his birthright the past’s accumulated warehouse of technical knowledge, from reading and writing to the recipe for scones, penicillin, suspension bridges, internal combustion engines, and nuclear weapons," observes Roger Kimball in an elegantly dismissive review of Patrick Buchanan's new revisionist history of WWII — Churchill, Hitler and "The unnecessary War" — wherein "Brownshirt Buchanan" attempts to blame not Hitler but Churchill for the war and, by extension, the holocaust. But Paddy's history-challenged revisionism is only a pretext for a Kimballist cogitation on the human condition:

There is an important sense in which a clever 18-year-old knows more physics than Newton, more chemistry than Lavoissier, more mathematics than Euclid. But is he wiser about politics than Madison or Tocqueville? Does he know more about the question, “How should I live my life?” than Socrates?

It has often been observed that one of the distinctive achievements of the species homo sapiens sapiens is its ability to pass knowledge down from one generation to the next: the great repositories of technical know-how and scientific insight into the workings of nature are eloquent testaments to this awesome process. Unfortunately, the operation of tradition, of handing down, is less successful in the realm of morals and politics …

Every generation, it seems, has to recollect the vital, hard won lessons of the past. When it comes to political wisdom, forgetfulness is all-too-often mankind’s inheritance.

His words resonate today as heavy spring floods threaten to overtop and undermine the levees downstream from earlier flooding in Iowa. Following a record flood in 1927, the Flood Control Act of 1928
authorized the Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project to
control the "project flood," that is, any flood larger than the record
flood, according to the Army Corps of Engineers website. MR&TP includes levees, floodways, channel improvement and
stabilization and tributary basin improvements. We shall see how well they work
to stem the tide in the coming days.

Around St. Louis, where the Mississippi is expected to crest this weekend, a number of scientists and activists argue the floods aren't caused by heavy rainfall but by irresponsible development. There has
been considerable building since 1993 in Greater St. Louis, where demand for accessible property is at a premium. New and expanding communities pushed for new, taller and stronger levees.

By building along the riverbanks and forcing the Mississippi into a bed that is less than half the width of where it ran a century ago, residents are displacing water and forcing the river to run faster and higher. That, in turn, increases demand for taller, broader levees.

But as those levees make way for development that paves over wetlands, more runoff water is channeled into the river. Critics said the result is a self-perpetuating cycle: The rivers rise higher, new
levees are built bigger, the rivers rise again."

By the year 1879, the need for improvement of the Mississippi River had become widely recognized. The necessity for coordination of engineering operations through a centralized organization had finally been accepted.

Accordingly, in that year, the Congress established the Mississippi River Commission and assigned it the duties. . . " to take into consideration and mature such a plan or plans and estimates as will correct, permanently locate, and deepen the channel and protect the banks of the Mississippi River, improve and give safety and ease to navigation thereof, prevent destructive floods, promote and facilitate commerce, trade, and the postal service."

The Mississippi River always has been a threat to the security of the valley through which it flows.Garciliaso de la Vega, in his history of the expedition begun by DeSoto, described the first recorded flood of the Mississippi as severe and of prolonged duration, beginning about March 10, 1543, and cresting about 40 days later. By the end of May the river had returned to its banks, having been in flood for about 80 days.

Since that time, explorers, traders, farmers, men of commerce, and engineers have known — sometimes too well — the Mississippi in flood.

All is well. She switches to automatic pilot until something comes up.

Those who were there and lived to tell the tale are scarred for
life and will never forget. They know it in their bones and will try
to warn the world — of what? Pay attention to your surroundings? Don't
take anything for granted? Repent before it's too late? — with their
stories. Locally it will enter the communal lore. But beyond the
region, it won't stick. The rest of us out here in the larger world —
who only hear of it, see media images and try in our mind's eye to
imagine the horror but then can turn away to the comfort of our
everyday lives — we are the ones in danger of forgetting.

And of course, for far too many Democrats, they deny the past ever happened! Selective amnesia or willful obfuscation? You decide.

Meanwhile, the exquisite Tiny warms the heart and relaxes the soul. I have to confess to a deep desire to pick her up and hold her close to my heart and just cuddle her until she's limp with pleasure - and she probably isn't even that kind of cat. But in the abstract, it sure is a lovely thought!

Ah flooding and the Mississippi... a perpetual dilemma it seems. 1993 is not that long ago - less than 20 years! Yet, much of the land that was completely underwater during that flood, has now been built up. Talk about forgetting...

My husband and I discussed this at length a few times (being as we have family living in the St. Louis area - although not the flood plains).

While for businesses it might make sense to build in these areas and simply take the risk of being flooded out - people buying homes there will most certainly be SOL when the flood waters hit. They'll lose a lot if not everything. I feel sorry for those who came from other areas and didn't know these were flood plains (it's not exactly evident during low water times!), but I don't feel sorry for those who grew up in the area and know where the water goes yet choose to build/buy there anyway.

It's not only the Mississippi - it's the Missouri and Meramec Rivers too. They surround the area and when the Mississippi backs up - they have no where to run off so it's a chain reaction.

The flooding is cyclical - everyone knows there are drought years and wet years. Yet the news media don't seem to understand this - thus you have the huge drama via television. I talked to my sister yesterday - so far the water level is 12 feet below the 1993 levels for the same time period.

Of course coming from this type of background - we now check before we buy a house on the surrounding area and how prone it might be to flooding.

My cousin, Nancy lives in Sioux City, IA in northwest Iowa and when I asked her how they were doing with the flooding in central Iowa she told me that they are fine and that central Iowa doesn't take care of their smaller rivers and too many people live near flood zones.

If I remember rightly, during the Civil War General Grant and his engineers attempted to change the course of the Mississippi River in order to bypass the fortifications at Vicksburg, Mississippi. Although it did not seem to work at the time, the constant force of the river at the point of Grant's excavations, over time eventually changed the course of the River. Today if you visit Vicksburg you will find that the river is no longer close to the city. Nature finished what Grant started.