Apple manager charged in kickback scheme agrees to protect secrets

The Apple manager accused of taking kickbacks in exchange for company information has agreed to keep secret company information from being publicly disclosed through an ongoing criminal case.

Paul Devine agreed to a protective order put together by the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Francisco, Calif., last week, according to Bloomberg. The prosecution noted that discovery in the case against the Apple employee could produce material "that is intended to be kept secret and is trade secret information."

"Devine agreed to procedures about how the data will be handled during pretrial bargaining, without giving up his right to challenge how such information may be used at trial, according to court documents," the report said.

Devine, 37, was arrested in August and charged with accepting more than a million dollars in kickbacks from Asian suppliers. He has pleaded not guilty.

Investigators in the case found that Devine had stashed more than $150,000 in shoe boxes in his home. The prosecution has alleged that the Apple manager used his security clearance to provide confidential information to Apple's overseas suppliers, which then used the information to negotiate favorable contracts.

In addition to the criminal trial — in which Devine has been charged with wire fraud, kickbacks and money laundering — he also faces a civil suit from Apple. A judge last month determined that Devine would be a potential flight risk if he was let out on bail before turning over the cash he received, much of which is said to be in overseas bank accounts.

Devine's arrest caused a stir with Apple's overseas suppliers, including Pegatron, which suspended an executive that was linked to the kickback scheme. Pegatron was allegedly not involved in the scam, but it since acquired Kaedar Electronics, which paid a brokerage commission to an intermediate trading company — not an individual — between 2005 and 2008. Kaedar has supplied iPod packing boxes to Apple since 2005.

In addition, officials with Cresyn said their company met with Devine in 2006, and the Apple supply manager reportedly offered consulting services to aid in negotiations with Apple. Cresyn, which supplies earbuds that ship with Apple's iPods, said it believes it made a "legal contract" with Devine, in which it paid a consulting fee in exchange for "general information about U.S. markets."

lol i love this guy... shoeboxes? really now... i wish i could stash 150k in shoe boxes such a great place for it. what is he 5 years old?

It's kinda a necessity unless you want the IRS to catch wind that you are trying to rip them off. Al Capone committed tons of crimes that were horribly violent - all of which the police never went after (for various reasons like corruption). What did he get convicted of? Tax evasion - he couldn't hide his ill gotten profits since he couldn't legally report them - of course he didn't file at all...

Deposing of large amounts of cash is always a problem. Keeping it in a shoebox, or hid on property is pretty common. You have to have a bank behind you to really commit large cash intensive crime. So for example, when a Mexican Drug cartel moves 5 tractor trailers of cash out of the states, and into Mexico (as was recently reported) how would you assume they handle it? It is estimated they hand out 100 million cash a month for bribes (as was recently reported) , but that leaves a few tractor trailers worth that needs to be laundered. We can't all own banks, particularly at the low level of corruption reported here.

At this level, He should have gotten a second mortgage on his home, bought a business with it, laundered the money though the business, paid off both his mortgages in a year or three, fixed his house, sold it, and repeat, until it was all disposed of. Real estate is the best way to launder in our country.

Is this the guy who already agreed to keep secret information from being disclosed - while he worked at Apple?

Yep.

Basically this whole agreement thing is required to avoid a mistrial. They can't hide trade secrets that are pertinent to the case unless both sides agree to it. Otherwise Devine's lawyers could have cause for an appeal over that issue. And unless it is in writing that both sides won't reveal the details, his lawyers could blurt out whatever they want during the trial, making it public record etc.

So they both agree not to say anything that is still a trade secret is basically all it is about. Legal Mumbo Jumbo