In 1971, President Nixon and Congress declared war on cancer. Since then, the federal government has spent well over $105 billion to battle cancer.

In 2010 alone, the National Cancer Institute had a budget of $6.4 billion. As of March 2011, the Susan B. Komen Foundation, allegedly leading the fight against breast cancer, had $439,451,449 in âtotal public support and revenue.â Pharmaceutical giant Merck alone had a 2010 research and development budget of 8.12 billion.

Why all the death and suffering despite billions, if not trillions, in government and private cancer research?

Why have cancer treatments remained almost unchanged since the 1950s: toxic radiation, toxic chemotherapy, and surgery?

The answer is simple: treating cancer is profitable; curing it is not. Cancer also furthers the globalist goal of massive depopulation.

Worldwide cases of cancer are likely to rise by nearly 75 percent by 2030 according to a study published in The Lancet Oncology. A team led by Freddie Bray of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Lyon, France, said that in 2008 there were 12.7 million new cases of cancer, which would rise to 22.2 million by 2030, with 90 percent of the rise occurring in the poorest countries.

In other words, the business forecast for pharmaceutical companies, tax-free cancer foundations and government health organizations is great.

If you still canât believe that the cancer epidemic is a soft-kill operation, than you should understand Democide.

Democide is the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder. Democide does not include soldiers killed in battle. During the 20th Century (1900s) alone, Professor R.J. Rummel calculates that government power was used to murder approximately 262,000,000 people.

It is well known by nutritionists and true healers that the best way to beat cancer is not to get it. That is, we must have proper

nutrition and exercise to keep our immune systems functioning properly. We must also eliminate all forms of toxins from our every-day environment.

BPA. Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widely used chemical that can behave like estrogen. It is used in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. BPA is in many consumer products, including the lining of food and beverage cans, plastic food packaging, dental sealants, paper receipts and water pipes. Exposure in people is widespread and occurs mainly through eating or drinking contaminated food and beverages.

Animal and human studies have linked BPA to hormone-sensitive cancers, including breast and prostate cancers. A recent study form China found that exposure to BPA may be a risk factor for a common type of brain tumor called meningioma. The study participants with the highest urine BPA levels were about 1.6 times (160%) more likely to be diagnosed with meningioma compared to those with lower concentrations.

BPA is found in the urine of 95 percent of adults. Research from Harvard University found that eating canned soup can spike your urinary (BPA) levels by 1,200 percent compared to fresh soup. Canada lists BPA as a âtoxic substanceâ and has banned it from being used in baby bottles.

However, in March of 2012, the FDA blocked a ban on BPA in the United States despite its well-proven links to cancer. 4.7 tons of BPA is expected to be made in 2012 by AkzoNobel N.V., Dover Chemical Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Huntsman Corporation, Rhodia (Solvay Group), and SI Group, Inc.

While many consumers now wisely refuse to purchase plastic products unless they are BPA free, many plastic manufactures have replaced BPA, with Bisphenol-S (BPS), which may be even more dangerous. Therefore, it is best to avoid plastic products and use glass instead. Unfortunately, almost all bottled water is sold in plastic bottles.

Fluoride. Speaking of water, almost every water district in the United States ads toxic sodium fluoride/hydrofluosilicic acid to our tap water. After years of denial, the CFR/Rockefeller controlled federal government finally admitted that fluoride harms children. Rather than removing the toxins, the federal government called for a reduction in the amount of fluoride added to public water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). Of course it has long been known by real researchers, as opposed to the American Dental Association, that fluoride harms teeth.

The Harvard School of Dental Health found that fluoridated causes cancer:

New American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma - bone cancer - between the ages of 10 and 19â¦ The increased cancer risks, identified in a newly available study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health, were found at fluoride exposure levels common in both the US and Britainâ¦. Even with DDT, you don't have the consistently strong data that the compound can cause cancer as you now have with fluoride.'

It should also be noted that several unethical water bottling companies add fluoride to their water (Nursery Purified Water - DS Waters, Dannon Fluoride To Go, and others). They advertise that fluoride is great for kids and promotes strong teeth despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Pesticides. The soft-kill cancer operation continued in plain view when California legislators approved the use of methyl iodide on California strawberry crops with knowledge that it was linked to cancer, late-term miscarriages, thyroid disease and neurological damage in humans. In 2007, the Bush administration approved methyl iodine nationally with 47 states registering the chemical for use.

Fortunately, Arysta LifeScience, methyl iodide manufacturer and largest private pesticide corporation in the world, pulled methyl iodide from the U.S. market on March 20, 2012.

Workers who apply certain pesticides to farm fields are twice as likely to contract melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. Yet we are told that non-organic foods are safe to eat. Likewise, researchers find higher levels of common household pesticides in the urine of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a cancer that develops most commonly between three and seven years of age.

The lingering effects of DDT pesticide use is increased rates of cancer.

Parabens. Cancer-causing chemicals have been added to our personal hygiene products. Parabens are a chemical compound found in everyday toiletry products including moisturizers, make-up, shaving foam, tanning lotions and toothpaste. They are also found in numerous brands of underarm deodorant.

A study of 160 women with breast cancer revealed that parabens were present in the tumors of all the women. âIn total, 160 samples were collected, four from each woman. They found 99 per cent of the tissue samples contained at least one paraben and 60 per cent of the samples had five.â

Aluminum. Most antiperspirant contains aluminum, and that aluminum may be absorbed into womenâs breast tissue where it could potentially increase the risk of breast cancer or other health problems. Women with breast cancer have higher levels of aluminum in their nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), a fluid present in the breast duct tree. Studies show aluminum from antiperspirants is deposited in breast tissue, and animal studies have also found that aluminum can cause cancer. Studies also classify Aluminum as a neurotoxin associated with Alzheimerâs disease.

Chemtrails/Geoengineering. Chemtrails containing toxins such as Aluminum and Barium are being sprayed into the atmosphere daily as one of the most blatant tools of the depopulation agenda. Therefore, the air we all breathe now contains Aluminum and Barium particles that should not be there. Particle pollution can increase the risk of heart disease, lung cancer and asthma attacks and can interfere with the growth and efficiency of the lungs.

Chemtrails are poisoning all life on the planet and most people fail to even notice. Please take the time to do your own research on chemtrails/geoengineering as it is beyond the scope of this article.

Sunscreen. Many popular sunscreens contain ingredients known to spur the growth and spread of skin cancer cells, which defeats their stated purpose of preventing skin cancer. Even worse, the FDA has allegedly been aware of this critical information for the past ten years, but has done absolutely nothing to warn people about it.

Only 7.8 percent of the sunscreens tested have been deemed "safe and effective." The other 92.2 percent, which represent hundreds of sunscreens on the market today, contain one or more ingredients known to be harmful to health, a shocking figure when considering their widespread use.

Sugar. It has long been known that cancer cells feed on sugar and that those with cancer should reduce their sugar/simple carbohydrate intake. Today Americans are swallowing 22 teaspoons of sugar each day or about 100 pounds per year. One can of soda alone has 39 grams of sugar (8 teaspoons) â thank you Pepsi and Coca-Cola. No wonder so many Americans suffer from cancer.

Common and Medical Radiation. CT scans are associated with increased risks of cancer, yet patients are not warned of the danger. Exposing a child to the nuclear radiation from two or three computed tomography (CT) head scans can triple the risk of developing brain cancer later in life, according to a 20-year study. The study also found that a child exposed to the cumulative radiation of between five and 10 CT scans is three times more likely than an unexposed child to develop leukemia.

Likewise, dental X-rays raise brain cancer risk. A study involving 1,400 cancer patients found that patients who reported having yearly bitewing exams (dental x-rays) were up to two times more likely to develop meningioma.

Mammograms cause cancer by exposing the body to ionizing radiation that can be 1,000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray, which we know poses a cancer risk.

If a woman follows the current guidelines for premenopausal screening, over a 10 year period she would receive a total dosage of about 5 rads. This approximates the level of exposure to radiation of a Japanese woman one mile from the epicenter of atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki." ... [In] a study by Dr. Robert M. Kaplan, the chairman of the department of health services at the School of Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles... they found 22 percent more invasive breast tumors in the group who had mammograms every two years compared to the group who had just one mammogram over a six-year period.

Following on the heels of recent revelations that X-ray mammography may be contributing to an epidemic of future radiation-induced breast cancers, in a new published in the journal Cancer July 1st, 2012, reports that radiation treatment actually drives breast cancer cells into greater malignancy.

The researchers found that even when radiation kills half of the tumor cells treated, the surviving cells which are resistant to treatment, known as induced breast cancer stem cells (iBCSCs), were up to 30 times more likely to form tumors than the nonirradiated breast cancer cells. In other words, the radiation treatment regresses the total population of cancer cells, generating the false appearance that the treatment is working, but actually increases the ratio of highly malignant to benign cells within that tumor, eventually leading to the iatrogenic (treatment-induced) death of the patient.

Airport Naked Body Pervert Porno Scanners not only violate the Fourth Amendment, but they are linked with increased rates of cancer. There has been a surge in cases of TSA workers developing cancer as a result of their close proximity to radiation-firing devices

Dr. Edward Dauer, head of radiology at Florida Medical Center, says that naked body scanners can cause cancer, particularly in those over age 65 and in women who are said to be genetically prone to developing breast cancer.

Europe has banned airport naked body scanners due to cancer fears. The decision comes after American academic Dr. David Brenner the scanners could deliver up to 20 times more radiation to the skin than previously thought - potentially increasing the risk of skin cancer.

Cell phones. Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same "carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.

Radiation has also been linked to DNA damage and cancer. The Office of National Statistics in the United Kingdom discovered a 50 percent increase in frontal and temporal lobe tumors in children during the ten year span covering 1999 to 2009, most likely caused by cell phones.

One in three children under the age of ten currently has a cellphone in their possession. Researchers warn: "Children should only use mobile phones for essential purposes and keep all calls short."

Yet despite the obvious danger, the government requires no radiation or cancer warning on cell phones.

Likewise, laptop computers have been linked to cancer by electromagnetic radiation.

Smart Meters do not just spy on you, they produce electromagnetic radiation that can damage our health and possibly be linked to cancer.

Mercury. Mercury in any form is poisonous, with mercury toxicity most commonly affecting the neurologic, gastrointestinal (GI) and renal organ systems. Poisoning can result from mercury vapor inhalation, mercury ingestion, mercury injection, and absorption of mercury through the skin.

It has been shown that mercury rapidly depletes the immune system. Mercury has also been shown to induce auto-immune diseases. Anything that depletes and disturbs the immune system will increase oneâs chances of contracting cancer.

Vaccines. Vaccines are perhaps the ultimate soft-kill weapon that the global elite use against humanity.

Mercury (as Thirmerosal), Aluminum and Formaldehyde (a known carcinogen used for embalming) have been used as a preservative in child-hood vaccines and are still present in many flu shots. There are hundreds if not thousands of studies linking vaccines with cancer and neurological disorders such as Autism.

The infamous soft-kill operation known as the Polio vaccine (1950s - 1960s) delivered the SV-40 Cancer virus to millions of Americans and preceded an explosion in cancer rates. Brave whistleblowers like Doctors Bernice Eddy and Sarah Steward were told to shut-up and ignored as the soft-kill operation was released to the public.

Meanwhile, the Polio vaccine is still used against unsuspecting citizens of third-world nations.

Recently an Italian court found vaccine makers liable for damaging children. But in the United States, after vaccine makers were nearly wiped-out by lawsuits brought by parents of injured children, Congress granted them legal immunity. The Supreme Court upheld the immunity stating that vaccines are âunavoidably unsafe.â

Eugenicist Bill Gates and other globalists such as the Rockefeller Foundation fund vaccine research in order to reduce the human population through soft-kill methodology. That is the true reason that many governments are pushing to make vaccines mandatory, even going door-to-door against natural law and the will of informed parents.

Dental Filings. Dental amalgams are the primary source of mercury exposure in Americans. A single dental amalgam filling releases as much as 15 micrograms of mercury per day. The average individual has eight amalgam fillings and could absorb up to 120 micrograms of mercury per day. For comparison, eating mercury-tainted seafood will expose you to about 2.3 micrograms per day.

The National Cancer Institute linked periodontal disease to pancreatic cancer. âOur study provides the first strong evidence that periodontal disease may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer,â said Dr. Dominique Michaud of the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, who led the research. Men with a history of periodontal disease had a 64 per cent increased risk of pancreatic cancer than men with no such history.

Light Bulbs. In 2007, Skull and Bones cult member George W. Bush signed a bill mandating that, âManufacturers will no longer be able to make the 100-watt Thomas Edison bulb after Jan. 1, 2012, followed by the 75-watt version in Jan. 2013, and the 60- and 40-watt bulbs in Jan. 2014.â

The standard incandescent bulb was to be replaced soft-kill CFL bulbs, which are harmful to humans and the environment because they are filled with toxic mercury. âA report released in 2008 from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection revealed that when a CFL bulb is broken, it can release dangerously high levels of mercury into the air.

Fortunately the planned ban was repealed and you need not pollute your home with toxic CFL bulbs.

High Fructose Corn Syrup. High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is used as a sweetener in thousands of mainstream packaged foods sold in the United States and around the world, from bread to soda and even breakfast cereal.

Researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) found that cancer cells have a particular liking for refined fructose. In tests, pancreatic cancer cells quickly fed on refined fructose and used it to divide and proliferate rapidly within the body.

"These findings show that cancer cells can readily metabolize fructose to increase proliferation," explained Dr. Anthony Heaney of UCLA's Jonsson Cancer Center, one of the authors of the study.

Published in the journal Cancer Research, the findings also reveal that not all sugars are the same, a widely held belief in mainstream medicine. Tumor cells love both glucose sugar and fructose sugar, but fructose directly causes cancer cells to reproduce and spread in a way that glucose does not.

The study demonstrates that there is a major difference between high fructose corn syrup, a highly-refined sugar commonly used in processed American foods and beverages, and refined sugar cane. Both can lead to health problems, but high fructose corn syrup is worse in terms of cancer growth.

Additionally, a study conducted by David Wallinga, M.D., entitled "Not So Sweet: Missing Mercury and High Fructose Corn Syrup" (http://healthobservatory.org/library.cfm?refid=105026) reveals that nearly one-third of all grocery items sweetened with HFCS were contaminated with mercury.

The average American consumes 12 teaspoons of HFCS every day! So just by eating the standard American diet of processed foods, consumers are right now potentially exposing themselves to exceedingly high levels of mercury that far surpass the safety limits set by the EPA.

High Fructose Corn Syrup also contributes to obesity. A Princeton University research team demonstrated that rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained significantly more weight than those with access to table sugar, even when their overall caloric intake was the same.

Obesity is linked to higher rates of cancer. According to the American Institute for Cancer Research, more than 100,000 cancer cases in the U.S. are linked to excess body fat - most of them are preventable.

Microwave Ovens. Nearly every home has a microwave oven to quickly heat or cook food. Yet many studies conducted throughout the world have repeatedly highlighted the deleterious effects of microwave ovens on human health. In fact microwave ovens are so dangerous that they were banned in Russia from 1976 to 1987. Twenty years of thorough research by Russian scientists convinced them that the dangers of the devices outweighed the benefits in cooking time.

A recent experiment showed that microwaved water given to a plant causes the plant to wither and die within days; however, another identical plant given water that was boiled on a conventional stove grew normally during the same time period. Therefore, microwave ovens likely alter and destroy your food as well.

Pasteurization was discovered by Louis Pasteur in the mid-1800s. It compromises your milk, Almonds and juice.

Pasteurization destroys vitamins, enzymes and interferes with absorption. When you boil a liquid, you kill any bacteria and make that food sterile. In the process, you can't help but affect the taste and nutritional value of that food.

Pasteurization is the process of heating a liquid to a high enough temperature to kill certain bacteria and disable certain enzymes.

Food Irradiation (radiation). The FDA approved food irradiation, the brainchild of the Atomic Energy Commission's efforts in the Eisenhower administration to find practical uses for the flood of radioactive wastes from nuclear weapons. Industry and the FDA insist that irradiated food has been thoroughly tested and is absolutely safe. However, New York, New Jersey and Maine have prohibited the sale and distribution of irradiated food, as have foreign governments, including Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand. Claims of safety are unproven at best.

Studies have linked food irradiation with increased risk of cancer.

Aspartame. The average person consumes about 2 or 3 mg/kg aspartame each day through diet soda and artificial sweeteners. A study of rats links low doses of aspartame -- the sweetener in NutraSweet, Equal, and thousands of consumer products -- to leukemia and lymphoma.

"Our study has shown that aspartame is a multipotential carcinogenic compound whose carcinogenic effects are also evident at a daily dose of 20 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg), notably less than the current acceptable daily intake for humans," the authors write.

Donald Rumsfeld, best known for slaughtering Iraqis that had nothing to do with 9/11, is largely responsible for foisting the Aspartame soft-kill operation on the public.

Chlorine. Chlorine has been used to disinfect U.S. and British tap water supplies for 100 years. Low levels of chlorine in tap water used for bathing can almost double the risk of bladder cancer. Swimming in public pools can also present a risk because chlorine levels are much higher.

Researchers found that those living in areas with high-chlorine content water, who bathed in it regularly, were 83 per cent more likely to get a tumor than those in low-chlorine areas. Those who drank high-chlorine tap water were 35 per cent more likely to get bladder cancer. Regular swimming in pools increased the risk by 57 per cent.

Absorbing chlorine through the skin is thought to be more dangerous because it bypasses the liver, which filters out many harmful chemicals when water is swallowed.

It should be noted that many baby diapers and feminine products (pads/tampons) contain chlorine as the soft-kill operations rolls on.

Sodium Nitrate and other preservatives are commonly added to processed meat (cold cuts) and are linked with increased rates of cancer. It is best to buy preservative-free meat to avoid being soft-killed by cancer.

Nuclear Radiation is also a favorite soft-kill tool as radiation deaths are far more difficult to prove than cigarette smoking deaths, because the source is almost always unknown in its quantity, who it was delivered to, and when.

Contrary to government propaganda distributed by the mainstream media, there is no safe dose of radiation.

A French study published in the International Journal of Cancer found a leukemia rate twice as high among children under the age of 15 living within a 3.1-mile radius of France's 19 nuclear power plants. The study added to the findings of a German study published in late 2007 studying German children under 5 years old, which found that children of that age in the vicinity of German NPPs had suffered an increase in the incidence of childhood leukemia.

In 2003, a blue ribbon European Committee on Radiation Risk reported 61,600,000 cancer deaths worldwide from fallout of atom bomb testing during the 1950s and 1960s. Rain brought the fallout back down into the food supply.

This radioactive fallout, as it is called, carries something that's called strontium-90, which is the most dreadful poison in the world. For only one tablespoon equally shared by all the members of the human race could produce a dangerous level of radioactivity in the bones of every individual.

Lab tests found that children born in 1963 had about 50 times more Sr-90 in teeth than those born in 1950. Washington University officials used their results in testimony to the U.S. Senate leading to the Partial Test Ban Treaty signed by President John F. Kennedy, ending all above-ground atom bomb tests.

A book published by three prominent scientists concluded that based on records now available, some 985,000 people died, mainly of cancer, as a result of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. That is between when the accident occurred in 1986 and 2004. More deaths, it projects, will follow.

Evidence demonstrates that the Fukushima nuclear debacle is being used as a soft-kill operation, as absolutely nothing significant is being done to stop the continuous leak of radiation. The Fukushima disaster was entirely foreseen by prominent scientist such as Leuren Moret but her warning went unheeded.

Arnold Gunderson, a 39-year veteran of the nuclear industry, stated:

The numbers Iâve seen, from reputable scientists, are that Fukushima is going to kill 200,000 from increased cancers over the next 50 years.

Likewise, Dr. Christopher Busby, Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, states that 400,000 people will develop cancer within a 200 kilometer radius of Fukushima.

One estimate states that the fallout from the Fukushima nuclear meltdown resulted in 21,851 U.S. deaths within the first 14 weeks of the emergency. The rise in reported deaths after Fukushima was largest among the United States for infants under age one.

GM Crops may cause cancer. Dr. Stanley Ewen, a consultant histopathologist at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, says that a cauliflower [mosaic] virus used in GM foods could increase the risk of stomach and colon cancers.

Monsantoâs GM-derived rBGH (which is a genetically-altered growth hormone given to dairy cows to make them more milk) was shown to increase the production of IGF-1 from 70-1000%. IGF-1 is a very powerful hormone that has been linked to a 2.5-4 times higher incidence of human colon, breast and prostate cancer.

Conclusion

The global elite have clearly implemented their depopulation agenda and are spiking our food, air, water and bodies with toxins to give us cancer. These elites then profit immensely by selling us drugs through the pharmaceutical companies they control. These drugs normally provide temporary relief from cancer/disease systems, while being falsely marketed as a cure by fake studies and perverted statistics.

Fight cancer by not getting it. Please share the knowledge obtained from this research and links provided herein.

Lastly, the following resources may be helpful if you or someone you know has cancer:

*** Paul Adams is your humble servant. Those that oppose the New World Order have not the spirit of fear; but act with power, love, and a sound mind. Paul Adams is not a medical doctor and nothing contained in this article should be considered medical advice. This article is purely for informational purposes. Do your own research and think for yourself.

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHEDhttp://www.activistpost.com/2012/07/19-ways-cancer-becomes-ultimate-soft.html