Friday, July 04, 2014

Kurdish gains of more than a decade are under threat from latest Middle East crisis

Kurdish gains of more than a decade are under threat from latest Middle East crisis

For the region’s Kurdish minority, both sides of the current upheaval stand in the way of liberation, writes Ron Margulies

Kurdistan Workers' Party soldiers (Pic: Flickr/James Gordon)

The Kurdish people have a lot to lose
from the crisis in the Middle East. The emergence of the Islamic State
of Iraq and Syria (Isis) is a direct threat to the Kurds, against which
all Kurdish forces have mobilised.
But there is also a recurring threat that the major states will use
the chaotic circumstances to deal with the Kurds, as they often have in
the past.

The Kurds live in a well?defined area, where they are the
overwhelming majority. But this is divided between four countries—the
south-eastern corner of Turkey, and the adjacent parts of Syria, Iraq
and Iran.
The fourth largest ethnic group in the Middle East, after Arabs,
Persians and Turks, and numbering 30-40 million, the Kurds have never
had a state of their own.

Their history in each of the countries where they live has been one
of oppression, sometimes more brutal, sometimes less, and revolts,
always put down bloodily.
In modern Turkey, for example, their very existence was officially
denied. They were claimed to be “mountain Turks”, and their language to
be a dialect of Turkish. But Kurdish is an Indo-European language while
Turkish is Altaic, with its roots in central Asia.

There were a number of Kurdish uprisings in the 1920s and 1930s, put
down with extreme violence. In the 1980s, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party
(PFF) launched a guerrilla struggle. After 30 years and more than 40,000
dead, it has finally forced the Turkish state to the negotiating table.

Today, Turkey’s rulers have two main aims in the region.

One is to talk about an imaginary golden age under the Ottoman
Empire, and become the main force in the Middle East. The other is to
stop anything that could lead to Turkey’s Kurdish minority breaking
away.
Turkey is a majority Sunni country and its government likes to play
the Sunni card. It both sympathises with Sunnis in Syria and Iraq, and
would like to use them for its own purposes.

It is thought likely that the government secretly supported Isis, at
least at the beginning. If they did, they bitterly regret it now, as
Isis attacked the Turkish consulate in Mosul and is keeping dozens of
diplomats and staff hostage.

In Iraq and Iran, Kurdish history was similarly bloody, with
genocidal campaigns against them both by the Shah of Iran and Saddam
Hussein.

However, in Iraq, an uprising against Hussein in 1991 and the First
Gulf War saw guerrilla forces drive the Iraqi army out of the Kurdish
northern parts of the country.

A period of self-rule was followed in 2005 by the recognition of
Iraqi Kurdistan—or South Kurdistan, as Kurds prefer to call it—as a
federal part of Iraq. The region is now effectively an independent
state.
The US-led occupation forces and the government it set up preferred
to accept the Kurds’ autonomy rather than risk generalised resistance
from across Iraqi society.

Similarly, the chaos in Syria has also allowed the Kurds there to
create an autonomous region as Bashar al Assad’s regime focused on
putting down the broader uprising. But these bastions of Kurdish rule are precarious in the shifting political sands of the Middle East.

Kurdish successes have alarmed Iran and Turkey, while the Syrian and Iraqi governments are in no state even to be alarmed. No ruler feels in control, and the gains made by the Kurds in the past decade or so are under threat.

About Me

We do not open attachments. Stop e-mailing them. Threats and abusive e-mail are not covered by any privacy rule. This isn't to the reporters at a certain paper (keep 'em coming, they are funny). This is for the likes of failed comics who think they can threaten via e-mails and then whine, "E-mails are supposed to be private." E-mail threats will be turned over to the FBI and they will be noted here with the names and anything I feel like quoting.
This also applies to anyone writing to complain about a friend of mine. That's not why the public account exists.