Case T-407/09
Neubrandenburger Wohnungsgesellschaft v CommissionAction for annulment – State aid – Contracts for the sale of apartments as part of the privatisation of publicly-owned apartments in Neubrandenburg – Complaint – Act not subject to review – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act

Case T-58/10
Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v CommissionAction for annulment – State aid – German system of allowances paid to employees of insolvent undertakings and the financing thereof – Decision finding no State aid – Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 January 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:3

Case T-422/07
Djebel - SGPS v CommissionState aid – Aid scheme designed to promote modern and competitive entrepreneurial strategies – Planned aid for a commercial company in the form of a soft loan in order to help finance an investment by that company in Brazil – Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the common market – Duty to state reasons – Impairment of competition – Effect on trade between Member States – Equal treatment

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:11

Case T-315/10
Groupe Partouche v CommissionAction for annulment – Concentrations – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market – Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 January 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:21

Case T-237/09Région wallonne v CommissionEnvironment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — National emission allowance allocation plan for Belgium in respect of the period from 2008 to 2012 — Article 44 of Regulation (EC) No 2216/2004 — Subsequent correction — New entrant — Decision instructing the Central Administrator of the Community independent transaction log to enter a correction into the national allocation plan table
Language of the case: French

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 1 February 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:38

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 7 February 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:58

Case T‑59/09Germany v CommissionAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to an infringement procedure which has been closed — Documents originating from a Member State — Grant of access — Prior agreement of the Member State
Language of the case: German

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 14 February 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:75

Joined Cases T‑115/09 and T‑116/09Electrolux and Whirlpool Europe v CommissionState aid – Restructuring aid for a manufacturer of large home appliances notified by the French Republic — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market subject to conditions — Manifest errors of assessment — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 14 February 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:76

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 14 February 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:77

Joined Cases T‑268/08 and T‑281/08Land Burgenland and Austria v CommissionState aid — Aid granted by the Austrian authorities to the Grazer Wechselseitige group (GRAWE) in connection with the privatisation of Bank Burgenland — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Private investor in a market economy test — Application where the State acts as vendor — Determination of the market price
Language of the case: German

Case T-153/10Schneider España de Informática v CommissionCustoms union — Importation of colour television sets assembled in Turkey — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for waiver of post‑clearance entry in the accounts of import duties and for remission of those duties — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Commission decision rejecting that application — Annulment by the national court of decisions taken by national authorities ordering post-clearance entry of import duties in the accounts — No need to adjudicate
Language of the case: English

Summary

Order of the General Court (First Chamber), 28 February 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:94

Case T‑282/08
Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung v CommissionState aid — Aid granted by the Austrian authorities to the Grazer Wechselseitige group (GRAWE) in connection with the privatisation of Bank Burgenland — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Private investor in a market economy test — Application where the State acts as vendor — Determination of the market price

Cases T-29/10 and T-33/10Netherlands and ING Groep v CommissionState aid — Financial sector — Aid designed to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Capital injection with repayment or share conversion options conferred on the aid recipient — Amendment to the repayment terms during the administrative procedure — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Private investor test — Necessary and proportionate relationship between the amount of aid and the extent of measures intended to ensure compatibility of the aid
Languages of the case: Dutch and English

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 9 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:118

Case T-273/09Associazione "Giùlemanidallajuve" v CommissionCompetition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Abuse of dominant position — Rejection of a complaint — Legitimate interest — Community interest — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law
Language of the case: French

Summary

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of
19 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:129

Joined Cases T‑439/10 and T‑440/10Fulmen and Mahmoudian v CouncilCommon foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Burden and standard of proof
Language of the case: French

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 22 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:145

Case T-214/08Rehbein v OHIM – Dias Martinho and Dias Martinho (OUTBURST)Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark OUTBURST — Earlier national word mark OUTBURST — Genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Rule 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber), 28 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:161

Case T-123/09Ryanair v CommissionState aid — Loan granted to an airline company and capable of being counted as own capital — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Sale of assets of an airline company — Decision finding no aid at the conclusion of the preliminary examination phase — Actions for annulment — Locus standi — Interested party — Admissibility — Serious difficulties — Jurisdiction — Duty to state reasons
Language of the case: English

Case T‑262/07Lithuania v CommissionAgriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 29 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:171

Case T‑192/07
Comité de défense de la viticulture charentaise v CommissionCompetition — Decision rejecting a complaint — No Community interest — Scope of the complaint — Competence of the author of the act — Duty to state reasons

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:116

Case T‑42/11
Universal v CommissionCompetition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Request that the parent company pay the fine — Bank guarantee lodged in the name of the subsidiary — Date on which the fine becomes due for payment — Action for annulment — Measure not open to challenge — Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:122

Case T-113/06
Marine Harvest Norway and Others v CouncilDumping — Imports of salmon originating in Norway — Definition of the Community industry — Like product — Composition of the sample of Community producers

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:135

Case T-261/11
European Goldfields v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Subsidy granted by the Greek authorities in favour of the mining company Ellinikos Chrysos consisting of the transfer of the Cassandra mines at a price lower than the real market value and exemption from taxes on that transaction — Decision declaring the aid unlawful and ordering its recovery, with interest — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:157

Case T‑190/10
Egan and Hackett v ParliamentAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Registers of assistants to former members of the European Parliament — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:165

Case T-243/07
Poland v CommissionAgriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted as a result of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar, and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:168

Case T-247/07
Slovakia v CommissionAgriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted on account of the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary law — Decision 2007/361/EC

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:169

Case T-248/07
Czech Republic v CommissionAgriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Measures to be adopted due to the accession of new Member States — 2003 Act of Accession — Determination of surplus stocks of agricultural products other than sugar and the financial consequences of their elimination — Objective pursued by a provision of primary legislation — Decision 2007/361/EC

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:170

Case T‑509/10Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v CouncilCommon foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Power of the Council — Misuse of power — Entry into force — Non-retroactivity — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of law — Concept of support for nuclear proliferation — Error of assessment
Language of the case: French

Case T-326/11Brainlab v OHIM (BrainLAB)Community trade mark — Community word mark BrainLAB — Failure to apply for renewal of the registration of the trade mark — Removal of the trade mark from the register on expiry of registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Language of the case: German

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 25 April 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:202

Case T-341/10
F91 Diddeléng and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — Decision to take no further action on a complaint — Failure to bring an action for failure to fulfil obligations — No challengeable act — Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 April 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:183

Case T‑529/09In 't Veld v CouncilAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service on a recommendation from the Commission to authorise the opening of negotiations for an international agreement — Partial refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of international relations — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice — Specific and foreseeable threat to the interest in question — Overriding public interest
Language of the case: English

Case T‑158/10Dow Chemical v CouncilDumping — Imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Expiry of anti-dumping measures — Review — Likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping — Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 8 May 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:218

Case T‑344/08EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg v CommissionAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Administrative file relating to cartel proceedings — Refusal of access — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations — Exception concerning the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception concerning the protection of the decision-making process — Obligation of the institution concerned to carry out a concrete, individual examination of the content of the documents covered by the request for access
Language of the case: German

Case T‑300/10Internationaler Hilfsfonds v CommissionAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to contract LIEN 97‑2011 — Partial refusal of access — Determination of the subject-matter of the initial application — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process — Principle of sound administration — Concrete and individual examination — Duty to state reasons
Language of the case: German

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 22 May 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:247

Case T‑570/10Environmental Manufacturing v OHIM – Wolf (Representation of the head of a wolf)Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wolf’s head — Earlier national and international figurative marks WOLF Jardin and Outils WOLF — Relative grounds for refusal — Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Language of the case: English

Case T‑17/09
Evropaïki Dynamiki v CommissionPublic service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of informatics services for an electronic exchange of social security information project (EESSI project) in the field of the coordination of social security for persons mobile in Europe — Rejection of bid submitted by a tenderer — Award of the contract — Duty to state reasons — Transparency — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Non-contractual liability

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:243

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of
4 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:273

Case T‑395/11Elti v Delegation of the European Union to MontenegroActions for annulment — Public supply contracts — Tender procedure — Digitalisation of Montenegrin Public Broadcasting — Decision awarding the contract taken by the Delegation of the European Union to Montenegro — No legal capacity to be a defendant — Inadmissibility
Language of the case: English

Summary

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 4 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:274

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 27 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:320

Case T‑167/08Microsoft v CommissionCompetition — Abuse of dominant position — Client PC operating systems — Work group server operating systems — Refusal of the dominant undertaking to supply and authorise the use of interoperability information — Fulfilment of obligations under a decision finding an infringement and imposing behavioural measures — Periodic penalty payment
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 27 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:323

Case T‑372/10Bolloré v CommissionCompetition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for carbonless paper — Price-fixing — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Decision adopted following annulment of a first decision — Imputation of the infringement to the parent company in its capacity as direct participant — Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper basis in law — Legal certainty — Principle that penalties must be applied only to the offender — Fair hearing — Equal treatment — Reasonable time — Rights of the defence — Fines — Limitation period — Attenuating circumstances — Cooperation
Language of the case: French

Case T‑246/09
Insula v CommissionArbitration clause — Financing contracts for research and development projects — MEDIS and Dias.Net contracts — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements in respect of some of the declared expenses — Retention of a sum intended for another co‑contractor — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Counterclaim by the Commission — Partial removal of need to adjudicate in relation to the counterclaim

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:287

Case T‑546/11
Technion and Technion Research & Development Foundation v CommissionAction for annulment — Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Letter confirming the findings of an audit report and informing the applicant of the next steps in the procedure — Acts inseparable from the contract — Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:303

Case T‑37/11
Hungary v CommissionAction for annulment — Temporary instrument intended to finance actions at the new external borders of the European Union for the purpose of the implementation of the Schengen acquis and border control (Schengen Facility) — Contribution to Hungary in respect of the period from 2004 to 2006 — Recovery of part of the amount paid — Challengeable act — Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 June 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:310

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 5 July 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:345

Case T-304/08Smurfit Kappa Group v CommissionState aid — Corrugated case materials — Aid for the construction of a paper mill — Guidelines on State aid for regional purposes — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market — Admissibility — Validity of the authority conferred by a legal person on its lawyers — Adoption of a decision upon conclusion of the preliminary examination phase — Standing to bring proceedings — Procedural rights of interested parties — Serious difficulties justifying the initiation of the formal investigation procedure — Exercise by the Commission of its discretion — Article 87(3)(a) EC — Article 88(2) and (3) EC — Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 44(5) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 10 July 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:351

Case T-329/11
TME v CommissionPublic service contracts — Call for tenders in relation to the rehabilitation of the Bucharest wastewater treatment plant, jointly financed by the ISPA structural funds — Allegedly unlawful decision of the Romanian authorities to reject the tender submitted by the applicant — Refusal of the Commission to open a financial adjustment procedure with respect to Romania — Manifest inadmissibility

Case T-12/12
Laboratoires CTRS v CommissionMedicinal products for human use — Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Orphacol — Letter informing the applicant of the Commission’s intention to refuse authorisation — Application for a declaration of failure to act — Definition of position by the Commission — Inadmissibility — Application for annulment — Adoption of a new decision — No need to adjudicate

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:343

Case T-520/09
TF1 and Others v CommissionState aid — Public service broadcasting — Aid intended to be granted by the French Republic to France Télévisions — Budgetary grant for 2009 — Decision not to raise objections — Service of general economic interest — Criterion of proportionality — No serious difficulties

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:352

Case T-587/10
Interspeed v CommissionNon-contractual liability — External relations — Call for tenders issued by the EAR concerning work at the Preševo (Serbia) border crossing, the financing of the works and other connected measures — No causal link

Case T-264/00
Compagnia Generale delle Acque v CommissionAnnulment action — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Commission decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action partially inadmissible and partially manifestly devoid of any basis in law

Case T-201/10
IVBN v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations — Existing aid — Special project aid to housing corporations — Decision accepting the Member State’s commitments — Decision declaring new aid compatible — No individual concern — Failure to initiate the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Action inadmissible in part and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 July 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:385

Case T‑565/08Corsica Ferries France v CommissionState aid — Maritime cabotage sector — Service of general economic interest — Private investor in a market economy test — Social policy of the Member States — Restructuring aid — Effects of a judgment annulling a decision
Language of the case: French

Joined Cases T‑133/08, T-134/08, T-177/08 and T‑242/09Schräder v CPVO – Hansson (LEMON SYMPHONY and SUMOST 01)Plant varieties — Decision by the CPVO to adapt, of its own motion, the official description of the variety LEMON SYMPHONY — Application for revocation of the Community plant variety right granted for the variety LEMON SYMPHONY — Application for annulment of the Community plant variety right granted for the variety LEMON SYMPHONY — Application for a Community plant variety right for the variety SUMOST 01 — Summons to attend oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO — Period of notice to attend of at least one month
Language of the case: German

Case T‑156/11Since Hardware (Guangzhou) v CouncilDumping — Imports of ironing boards originating in China — Proceeding initiated against a single company — Market economy treatment — Three-month time-limit laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 2(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Burden of proof — Determination of injury
Language of the case: French

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 18 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:431

Cases T‑168/10 and T‑572/10Commission v SEMEA and Commune de MillauArbitration clause — Grant contract concerning a local development action consisting in the performance of work for the preparation and launching of a European Local Enterprise Centre in Millau (France) — Recovery of part of the sums paid — Admissibility of an action against a French company removed from the commercial and companies register — Application of French law — Administrative contract — Recovery of undue payments — Limitation period — Enforceability of an arbitration clause — Take-over of debt — Ancillary principle — Stipulation for third parties
Language of the case: French

Case T‑267/11Video Research USA v OHIM (VR)Community trade mark — Community figurative mark VR — Failure to apply for renewal of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 19 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:446

Case T‑52/12 RGreece v CommissionApplication for interim measures — State aid — Compensation payments made in 2008 and 2009 by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of the decision — Prima facie case — Urgency — Weighing up of interests
Language of the case: Greek

Summary

Order of the President of the General Court, 19 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:447

Case T‑169/08DEI v CommissionCompetition — Abuse of dominant position — Greek market for the supply of lignite and Greek wholesale electricity market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 86(1) EC, read in combination with Article 82 EC — Grant or maintenance of rights awarded by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the extraction of lignite
Language of the case: Greek

Case T‑154/10France v CommissionState aid — Aid allegedly implemented by France in the form of an implied, unlimited guarantee in favour of La Poste as a result of its status as a publicly-owned establishment — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Burden of proving the existence of State aid — Advantage
Language of the case: French

Case T-82/08Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe v CommissionCompetition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for flat glass in the EEA — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Evidence of the infringement — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Exclusion of captive sales — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances
Language of the case: English

Case T‑139/09France v CommissionState aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ seeking to support the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Co-financing by a public institution and by voluntary contributions from farmers’ organisations — Arguments not raised during the administrative procedure — Duty to state reasons
Language of the case: French

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:496

Case T‑387/09Applied Microengineering v CommissionFifth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration — Contracts concerning the projects ‘Formation of a New Design House for MST’ and ‘Assessment of a New Anodic Bonder’ — Recovery of part of the financial contribution paid — Enforceable decision — Decision amending the contested decision during the proceedings — Legal basis of the action — Nature of the pleas put forward — Legitimate expectations — Duty to state reasons — Principle of sound administration
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:501

Case T‑564/11
Farage v Parliament and BuzekLaw governing the institutions — Decision of the President of the Parliament imposing on a Member of the Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days — Decision of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Parliament declaring inadmissible the Member’s request for defence of his Parliamentary immunity — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Manifest inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:403

Case T‑657/11
Technion and Technion Research & Development Foundation v CommissionAction for annulment — Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Letter notifying the applicant of the Commission’s intention to recover the adjusted sums pursuant to a research financing contract — Acts inseparable from the contract — Inadmissibility

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:411

Case T‑394/06
Italy v CommissionEAGGF — ‘Guarantee’ section — Clearance of accounts — Expenditure excluded from financing — Irregularities or negligence attributable to administrations or bodies of Member States — Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 — Excessive delay in assessment by the Commission of communications sent pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 — Reasonable time limit

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:417

Case T‑379/09
Italy v CommissionState aid — Exemption from excise duty on diesel used to heat glasshouses — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Duty to state reasons — Selective nature — Effect on trade between Member States — Effect on competition — Directive 92/81/EEC — Directive 2003/96/EC — Community framework for State aid for the protection of the environment

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:422

Case T‑333/09
Poland v CommissionEAGGF — Modulation — Allocation between the Member States of savings made — Distinction between the old Member States and those which acceded to the European Union in 2004 — Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Solidarity — Equal treatment — Duty to state reasons

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:449

Case T‑243/09
Fedecom v CommissionState aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Joint financing by a public body and by voluntary contributions from producer organisations — Arguments contrary to the facts submitted during the administrative proceedings — Operating aid — Legitimate expectation

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:497

Case T‑328/09
Producteurs de légumes de France v CommissionState aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Legitimate expectation — Material error in the calculation of the amounts to be recovered

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:498

Case T‑160/10
J v ParliamentRight of petition — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to take no further action — Action for annulment — Duty to state reasons — Petition not falling within an area of activity of the European Union

Case T‑257/10
Italy v CommissionState aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain non-member countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Force of res judicata — Duty to state reasons

Case T‑303/10
Wam Industriale v CommissionState aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain non-member countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid in part incompatible with the common market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Execution of a judgment of the General Court — Duty to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Duty to exercise diligence — Duty of care

Case T‑465/09Jurašinović v CouncilAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Application for access to the reports of European Union observers present in Croatia from 1 to 31 August 1995 — Refusal of access — Risk of undermining the protection of international relations — Prior disclosure
Language of the case: French

Case T‑63/10Jurašinović v CouncilAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the course of a trial — Refusal of access — Risk of undermining the protection of international relations — Risk of undermining the protection of court proceedings and legal advice
Language of the case: French

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition), 3 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:516

Case T‑312/10
ELE.SI.A v CommissionArbitration clause — Sixth multiannual framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) — Contract concerning the ‘I Way, Intelligent, co-operative system in cars for road safety’ project — Termination of the contract — Request for repayment of the financial contribution paid — Damages — Action seeking to obtain the full financial contribution requested and to challenge the request for repayment — Counterclaim

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:512

Case T‑62/12
ClientEarth v CouncilAction for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Opinion issued by the legal service of the Council concerning a draft regulation of the Parliament and of the Council related to public access to the documents of the Parliament, of the Council and of the Commission — Confirmation of a refusal to grant full access — Inadmissibility — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Notion of measure open to challenge for the purposes of Article 263 TFEU — Confirmatory measure

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:525

Case T‑158/09
Greece v CommissionEAGGF — ‘Guarantee’ section — Expenditure excluded from financing — Clearance of accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAGGF — Negligence of the Member State in the recovery of sums wrongly paid — Liability of the Member State for the financial consequences of failure to recover

Case T‑247/09
Evropaïki Dynamiki v CommissionPublic service contracts — Tendering procedure — Supply of services relating to the production and dissemination of the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union and related offline and online media — Rejection of the bid of one tenderer and decision to award the contract to another tenderer — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:533

Case T-183/10
Sviluppo Globale v CommissionPublic service contracts — Public procurement procedure — Supply of technical assistance to the Government of Syria — Rejection of the tender — Duty to state reasons

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:534

Case T-220/10
Commission v EU Research ProjectsArbitration clause — Contract concluded in the framework of the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on a ‘User-friendly information society’ — Withdrawal from the project — Reimbursement of part of the amount advanced by the Commission — Default interest — Procedure by default

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:551

Case T‑447/10
Evropaïki Dynamiki v Court of JusticePublic service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of services for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications — Rejection of the applicant’s tenders and award of the contracts to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Award criteria — Obligation to state reasons — Non-contractual liability

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:553

Case T‑340/11
Régie Networks and NRJ Global v CommissionAction for damages — State aid — Limitation — Damage for which compensation may be awarded — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Manifest lack of jurisdiction

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:555

Case T­‑466/11
Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Shipbuilding — Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard — Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid — Inadmissibility

Case T‑442/11
Evropaïki Dynamiki v CommissionAction for annulment — Act not subject to review — Act which is confirmatory, in part, and informative, in part — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Failure to identify the alleged conduct or to define the alleged damage — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — No proof of damage — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:566

Case T‑137/10CBI v CommissionState aid — Public hospitals — Subsidies granted by the Belgian authorities to public hospitals belonging to the IRIS association — Decision at the end of the preliminary stage — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Service of general economic interest — Definition of public service mission — Proportionality of compensation for public service
Language of the case: French

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber), 7 November 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:584

Joined Cases T‑83/11 and T‑84/11Antrax It v OHIM – THC (Radiators for heating)Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community designs representing thermosiphons for radiators for heating — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — No different overall impression — Articles 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Saturation of the state of the art — Duty to state reasons
Language of the case: Italian

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 13 November 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:592

Order of the President of the General Court of 16 November 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:605

Case T‑76/11Spain v CommissionFisheries — Measures for the conservation of living aquatic resources — Article 105 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Deductions from quotas allocated for a given year on account of overfishing in previous years — Temporal application — Legal certainty — Interpretation guaranteeing compliance with primary law — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Non-retroactivity
Language of the case: Spanish

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 21 November 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:613

Case T-541/10ADEDY and Others v CouncilAction for annulment — Decisions addressed to a Member State with a view to remedying a situation of excessive deficit — No direct concern — Inadmissibility
Language of the case: Greek

Summary

Order of the General Court (First Chamber), 27 November 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:626

Case T-17/10
Steinberg v CommissionAction for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security — Duty to state reasons — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 November 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:625

Case T‑590/10
Thesing and Bloomberg Finance v ECBAccess to documents — Decision 2004/258/EC — Documents concerning the government debt and government deficit of a Member State — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the economic policy of the Union or of a Member State — Partial refusal of access

Case T‑15/11Sina Bank v CouncilCommon foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Duty to state reasons
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 11 December 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:661

Case T‑332/09Electrabel v CommissionCompetition — Concentrations — Decision imposing a fine for putting into effect a concentration — Obligation to suspend the concentration — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Limitation period — Amount of the fine
Language of the case: French

Case T‑167/10
Evropaïki Dynamiki v CommissionAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Requests for quotation — Refusal to grant access — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Admissibility — Exception relating to the protection of the economic policy of the European Union — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of public security — Duty to state reasons

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 December 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:651

Case T‑231/00
Adriatica di Navigazione and Comitato "Venezia vuole vivere" v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 December 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:667

Case T‑253/00
Bauer v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 December 2012
ECLI:EU:T:2012:668

Case T‑260/00
Cooperativa San Marco fra Lavoratori della Piccola Pesca and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Case T‑261/00
Sacaim and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Joined Cases T‑346/11 and T‑347/11Gollnisch v ParliamentPrivileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive immunity — Activity unconnected with the functions of a Member of the Parliament — Procedure for waiver of immunity — Decision not to defend privileges and immunities — No further interest in bringing an action — No need to adjudicate
Language of the case: French

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 17 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:23

Case T‑308/00 RENVSalzgitter v CommissionState aid — Steel industry — Tax incentives for the development of the border zone between the former German Democratic Republic and the former Czechoslovak Socialist Republic — Non-notified aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Recovery — Delay — Legal certainty — Calculation of the aid to be repaid — Aid falling within the scope of the ECSC Treaty — Investments for the protection of the environment — Discount rate
Language of the case: German

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition), 22 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:30

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 22 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:32

Joined Cases T‑339/10 and T‑532/10Cosepuri v EFSAPublic service contracts — Tender procedure — Shuttle service in Italy and Europe — Tenderer’s bid rejected — Decision to award the contract to another tenderer — Non-contractual liability — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Bid of the successful tenderer — Access refused — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party
Language of the case: Italian

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 29 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:38

Case T‑496/10Bank Mellat v CouncilCommon foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment
Language of the case: English

Cases T‑445/11 and T‑88/12
Charron Inox and Almet v Commission and CouncilAction for annulment — Action for damages — Dumping –Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in China — Provisional anti-dumping duty — No need to adjudicate — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:4

Case T‑392/07
Strack v CommissionAccess to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to confirmatory applications for access to documents and to a case brought before the General Court — Document register — Action for annulment — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Partial refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Duty to state reasons — Non-contractual liability

Case T‑413/11
Welte-Wenu v OHIM – Commission (EUROPEAN DRIVESHAFT SERVICES)Community trade mark — Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity — Community figurative mark EUROPEAN DRIVESHAFT SERVICES — Absolute ground for refusal — Imitation of the emblem of an international inter-governmental organisation — Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 6b of the Paris Convention — Content of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Admissibility of new elements — Article 56(2) and Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rule 37(b)(iv) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Jurisdiction of the Board of Appeal in the case of an action limited to part of the decision of the Cancellation Division

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:12

Case T‑21/12
Alfacam and Others v ParliamentAction for annulment — Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Supply of audiovisual services to the Parliament — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Articles 94 and 103 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:15

Case T‑218/00
Cooperativa Mare Azzurro and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Case T‑262/00
La Vigile San Marco v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Case T‑263/00
La Navale v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:29

Case T‑269/00
Sagar and Baglioni Hotels v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:35

Case T‑272/00
Barbini and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Case T‑273/00
Unindustria and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Case T‑540/10
Spain v CommissionCohesion Fund — Reduction of the financial assistance initially granted from the Cohesion Fund to four project stages concerning the construction of certain sections of the high-speed line linking Madrid and the French border — Time limit for adopting a decision — Article H(2) of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 — Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1386/2002 — Additional works or services — Concept of ‘unforeseen circumstances’ — Article 20(2)(f) of Directive 93/38/EEC

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber), 7 February 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:64

Case T‑492/10Melli Bank v CouncilCommon foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Entity wholly owned by an entity identified as being involved in nuclear proliferation — Plea of illegality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection
Language of the case: English

Summary

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), 20 February 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:80

Case T‑378/11Langguth Erben v OHIM (MEDINET)Community trade mark — Application for the Community figurative mark MEDINET — Earlier national and international figurative marks MEDINET — Claim of seniority of the earlier national and international marks — Earlier marks in colour and Community trade mark applied for not designating any specific colour — Signs not identical — Article 34 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Expediency of oral proceedings — Article 77 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Language of the case: German

Case T‑368/11
Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and Others v CommissionREACH — Transitional measures concerning the restrictions on the placing on the market and use of acrylamide for grouting applications — Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons

Case T‑263/11
Bopp v OHIM (Representation of a green octagonal frame)Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a green octagonal frame — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Offer of evidence submitted for the first time in the reply — Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Document sent to OHIM by fax — Applicable rules

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 February 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:61

Cases T‑278/00 to T‑280/00, T‑282/00 to T‑286/00 and T‑288/00 to T‑295/00
Albergo Quattro Fontane and Others v CommissionAction for annulment — State aid — Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of the aid paid out — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Case T‑591/10
Castiglioni v CommissionAction for annulment — Action for damages — Public works contracts — Tender procedure — Construction, restructuring and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure at the Joint Research Centre’s Ispra site — Selection criteria — Rejection of the tender submitted by one tenderer and a decision to award the contract to another tenderer — New pleas in law — Action in part manifestly unfounded in law and in part manifestly inadmissible

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 February 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:94

Order of the President of the General Court, 11 March 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:121

Joined Cases T‑229/11 and T‑276/11Inglewood and Others v ParliamentRules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Additional pension scheme — Decisions rejecting applications seeking to benefit from the provisions in force before the amendment to the additional pension scheme in 2009 — Plea of illegality — Acquired rights — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment
Language of the case: French

Case T‑539/10
Acino v CommissionMedicinal products for human use — Suspension of the placing on the market and withdrawal of medicinal products containing the active ingredient Clopidogrel — Variation of the authorisation to place on the market — Prohibition from placing medicinal products on the market — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 and Directive 2001/83/EC — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons

Case T‑64/12
Henkel and Henkel France v CommissionAction for annulment — Request seeking to obtain the transmission to the French competition authority of certain documents contained in the Commission’s file relating to competition proceedings concerning the European market for consumer detergents — Use in the context of national proceedings concerning the French detergents sector — Lack of interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility

Case T‑498/10
Mayer Naman v OHIM – Daniel e Mayer (David Mayer)Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark David Mayer — Earlier national word mark DANIEL & MAYER MADE IN ITALY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Request for proof of genuine use made for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Out of time — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:117

Case T‑89/13 R
Calestep v ECHAApplication for interim measures — Fees and charges payable to ECHA — Reduced fees granted to small enterprises — Verification by ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision ordering the recovery of the uncollected amount of the total fees payable — Application for suspension of operation of the decision — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:123

Case T‑92/11
Andersen v CommissionState aid — Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking DSB — Public service contracts for the supply of passenger rail transport services between Copenhagen and Ystad — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to conditions — Temporal application of rules of substantive law

Case T‑489/11
Rousse Industry v CommissionState aid — Aid granted by Bulgaria in the form of a debt waiver — Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — New aid — Distortion of competition — Obligation to state reasons

Case T‑409/10
Bottega Veneta International v OHIM (Shape of a handbag)Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a handbag — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Failure to take account of an element of the trade mark applied for — Rule No 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 March 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:148

Case T‑410/10
Bottega Veneta International v OHIM (Shape of a bag)Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Shape of a bag — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Failure to take account of an element of the trade mark applied for — Rule No 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 March 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:149

Case T‑671/11IPK International v CommissionFinancial assistance for an ecological tourism project — Repayment of the amounts recovered — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the earlier decision cancelling the assistance — Compensatory interest — Default interest — Calculation
Language of the case: German

Case T‑87/11
GRP Security v Court of AuditorsArbitration clause — Public service contracts — Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors — Action for annulment — Decision unilaterally to terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest — Measure of a contractual nature — Action not reclassified — Inadmissibility — Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months — Interest in bringing proceedings — Rights of defence — Serious breach of obligations — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Misuse of powers — Proportionality

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2013
ECLI:EU:T:2013:161