*Membership spots not really limited!

Outhouse Editor

Victorious Squid wrote:DD #512 seems like an endcap to the Shadowland story or whatever, which I haven't even followed in spoilers. That plus the $4 pricetag and the fact that many people who rarely post reviews will probably buy this one means I'm going to skip next week. I don't want anyone to think I have any principles though.

Outhouse Editor

Victorious Squid wrote:DD #512 seems like an endcap to the Shadowland story or whatever, which I haven't even followed in spoilers. That plus the $4 pricetag and the fact that many people who rarely post reviews will probably buy this one means I'm going to skip next week. I don't want anyone to think I have any principles though.

Staff Writer

Victorious Squid wrote:DD #512 seems like an endcap to the Shadowland story or whatever, which I haven't even followed in spoilers. That plus the $4 pricetag and the fact that many people who rarely post reviews will probably buy this one means I'm going to skip next week. I don't want anyone to think I have any principles though.

Staff Writer

Victorious Squid wrote:DD #512 seems like an endcap to the Shadowland story or whatever, which I haven't even followed in spoilers. That plus the $4 pricetag and the fact that many people who rarely post reviews will probably buy this one means I'm going to skip next week. I don't want anyone to think I have any principles though.

Rain Partier

Marvel is pleased to present your first look at DAREDEVIL #512, the landmark final issue from writer Andy Diggle and artist Roberto de la Torre! In the wake of the shocking conclusion of Shadowland, Hell's Kitchen has been thrown into disarray and Matt Murdock is among the missing. Does the mantle of Daredevil now rest with a dead man? And are his friends, lovers and allies able to cope with what he wrought, let alone atone for his sins? It's the dramatic last stand of a Marvel icon as this era of Daredevil comes to a close, only in DAREDEVIL #512.

Marvel is pleased to present your first look at DAREDEVIL #512, the landmark final issue from writer Andy Diggle and artist Roberto de la Torre! In the wake of the shocking conclusion of Shadowland, Hell's Kitchen has been thrown into disarray and Matt Murdock is among the missing. Does the mantle of Daredevil now rest with a dead man? And are his friends, lovers and allies able to cope with what he wrought, let alone atone for his sins? It's the dramatic last stand of a Marvel icon as this era of Daredevil comes to a close, only in DAREDEVIL #512.

Outhouse Editor

Daredevill hasn't been in the book since Shadowland started. It has been about Foggy and Dakota, it has also been the best part of the event. Shadowland, evidently, doesn't feature Daredevil either but his body possessed by some demon.

Outhouse Editor

Daredevill hasn't been in the book since Shadowland started. It has been about Foggy and Dakota, it has also been the best part of the event. Shadowland, evidently, doesn't feature Daredevil either but his body possessed by some demon.

Rain Partier

thefourthman wrote:Daredevill hasn't been in the book since Shadowland started. It has been about Foggy and Dakota, it has also been the best part of the event. Shadowland, evidently, doesn't feature Daredevil either but his body possessed by some demon.

Rain Partier

thefourthman wrote:Daredevill hasn't been in the book since Shadowland started. It has been about Foggy and Dakota, it has also been the best part of the event. Shadowland, evidently, doesn't feature Daredevil either but his body possessed by some demon.

Uh oh, I'm pretty positive Foggy Nelson is a lesbian.

"Being offended is not to be confused with a state of grace; it’s the occasional price we all pay for living in an open society." -- Ian McEwan

Rain Partier

GHERU wrote:Well, ITT, third party information is more reliable if one is trying to make a decision

If there's any other reason for me to go to the LCS, I'll at least take a look at this book. This is assuming Diamond doesn't short the hell out of half the stuff again. I have to take a closer look at the shipping list for next week. There must be something I'm buying.

Rain Partier

GHERU wrote:Well, ITT, third party information is more reliable if one is trying to make a decision

If there's any other reason for me to go to the LCS, I'll at least take a look at this book. This is assuming Diamond doesn't short the hell out of half the stuff again. I have to take a closer look at the shipping list for next week. There must be something I'm buying.

EDIT: Oh yeah, Supergod #5. No way am I missing that.

Also Kolchak The Night Stalker Files #1.

"Being offended is not to be confused with a state of grace; it’s the occasional price we all pay for living in an open society." -- Ian McEwan

******

by ****** » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:03 pm

thefourthman wrote:excluding definition 1b (well its second clause anyhow), your view (especially considering that everyone who has actually read the book tells you that your opinion of the character is flawed and was formed from a third party who probably had not read anything featuring the character and were furthermore probably just jumping to conclusions that allowed you to also jump to unfounded conclusions and even worse, attribute said third party's actions to a first party player) is a text book definition of the word ignorant, which has nothing to do with ignoring except in a crass sense in relation to the first clause of the second definition.

Thank you for making this post so I wouldn't have to.

******

thefourthman wrote:excluding definition 1b (well its second clause anyhow), your view (especially considering that everyone who has actually read the book tells you that your opinion of the character is flawed and was formed from a third party who probably had not read anything featuring the character and were furthermore probably just jumping to conclusions that allowed you to also jump to unfounded conclusions and even worse, attribute said third party's actions to a first party player) is a text book definition of the word ignorant, which has nothing to do with ignoring except in a crass sense in relation to the first clause of the second definition.