Trade Union Solidarity today said they are shocked and disappointed to learn that 10,200 jobs could possibly be lost at Sibanye Gold.

Although the official figure for the number of affected workers is currently standing at 7,400, there are also about 2, 400 contractors, 365 employees who are not yet placed as part of an earlier scaling-down process, and roughly 50 people in management positions affected by an unrelated process due to the separation between Sibanye's South African operations and its USA interests, which brings the number of affected employees to 10,200.

Solidarity General Secretary, Gideon Du Plessis said: "When taking into account that every mine worker takes care of about ten dependents and that many more jobs along the line are lost for every full-time miner’s job abolished, the retrenchments will have a major impact on innocent people."

"In addition to the fact that it is perturbing that Sibanye’s respective management teams have communicated conflicting information at yesterday’s various staff information sessions, Solidarity believes that Sibanye has acted in haste. This is because of the fact that the trade union recently pointed out to the mining house that some of the mines now affected are following inefficient mining processes resulting in a production bottleneck that prevents the efficient extraction of gold dust,” Du Plessis explained.

According to Du Plessis, in recent years management reshuffling's at some of the shafts that had been profitable in the past, the company replaced competent management teams with inexperienced management teams and that immediately resulted in losses.

Furthermore he also explained that Solidarity is acknowledging the fact that Sibanye and most of the mines in South Africa are facing major challenges and that losses are a reality.

"However, in the midst of the current tensions between the mining houses and the Minister of Mineral Resources, it will be a sad day if mines use retrenchments in their fight against the inept Minister and his involvement in the state capture process," Du Plessis said.

"There is a false and artificial tendency at some mining houses to announce huge retrenchment figures while a smaller retrenchment figure is actually envisaged in the hope that when fewer people are later retrenched, it would be seen as a noble concession from the company. It is inhuman to plunge 10 200 households in great uncertainty while not all of them will actually be affected. Solidarity therefore requests Sibanye to lay its cards on the table and to announce the actual retrenchment figure envisaged and determined behind closed doors."

He made the point that in its fight to save every affected employee's job, Solidarity will also ensure that Sibanye does not abuse the process as a way of simply aligning their general staff structure.

"Solidarity is furthermore calling on the various mining houses to work together to see to it that any vacant posts, no matter at which workplace, be filled by employees who are facing possible retrenchment, even if the job is with a neighboring employer," he explained.

"Apart from Solidarity’s opposition to and skepticism about the reasons for the proposed retrenchments, we are also concerned that, due to all the uncertainty in the mining industry and in the country, as well as the animosity from the Department of Mineral Resources, mining houses are generally no longer inclined to take the pain temporarily, or to carry financial losses. Nowadays, when losses are being suffered, they pull the trigger faster to reduce the workforce."

According to Du Plessis, the government has a role to play in this regard and they can do this by starting to create an environment for mining houses within which there is regulatory certainty and convenience to do business in South Africa.

"Government must begin to make a positive contribution to the mining sector, creating an environment within which mining can grow. It must stop breaking down the sector."

He pointed out that the current wave of retrenchments would have catastrophic social consequences, and many unemployed miners will then turn to the already uncontrollable illegal mining activities. "That, together with the rise in the number of the unemployed in communities surrounding mines, will create a social crisis. However the combination of unemployed and poor local government and lacking service delivery will cause an explosive situation which could lead to major unrest."

"It is in the interest of the country that the major retrenchment processes embarked upon by, among others, Sibanye and AngloGold Ashanti (8,500 jobs), are averted by trade unions, employers and government as partners," Du Plessis concluded.