Hi,
my question: Where are my workunits?
If I sea my resolds I can sea I have more than 120 jobs to do. But Boinc Manager say I me, I have only 3 jobs to do.
Whats is wrong with my PC or Bonic Manager?

I had 4 wu's finish during shutdown. they uploaded friday when system went back online but the system won't allow me to report them. had a 5th wu finish a bit ago and it won't upload. says the disc is full

Yea and WHY turn off validation just because the Scheduler is messed up

Seams to me that the system could be lowering the waiting for validation queue
and just disable the scheduler, and upload/download servers

The waiting for validation queue is at 0, how much lower can it go.

Results returned and awaiting validation 7,315,135

That is results that a wingmans result have not been received or validated due to the results not matching. The workunits waiting for validation is one line under that on the server status page and is 0.

Hmm. So if the upload store is full, would it empty if the db_purge.x86_64 was switched on? Least it would do something to speed things along when the uploader is switched back on... just a thought.

More to the point why is the upload store full? Is it due to waiting for so many results to be validated still with the wingmans results? Cos's if that's so then the only options for a 'fix' is to either a) dump half of the units and put them back in the 'to be done' pile and wait for the remainder of the results to come in before sending ANY more wu out or b) increase the size of the db storage area by half again at least and not release any more wu until most of those results are back in.

Hope I'm wrong on this 'cos it'll mean that there will have to be an artificial limit on 'in the wild' wu's to avoid a repeat.

Hmm. So if the upload store is full, would it empty if the db_purge.x86_64 was switched on? Least it would do something to speed things along when the uploader is switched back on... just a thought.

More to the point why is the upload store full? Is it due to waiting for so many results to be validated still with the wingmans results? Cos's if that's so then the only options for a 'fix' is to either a) dump half of the units and put them back in the 'to be done' pile and wait for the remainder of the results to come in before sending ANY more wu out or b) increase the size of the db storage area by half again at least and not release any more wu until most of those results are back in.

Hope I'm wrong on this 'cos it'll mean that there will have to be an artificial limit on 'in the wild' wu's to avoid a repeat.

Every unit set out creates an entry in the table. When there are matching results, the system inserts the result into the science DB. The entries in the table are then marked to be deleted. Some time later the deleter comes by and reclaims the space.

The real issue are the ghosts. They are units created that somehow do not get to the user to crunch due to network issues, or for some reason don't report back due to too many results being sent back at once. They have been exploding. Only when they time out, get resent, using yet another entry on disk, then get reported and match can the database get smaller. I've seen they have turned on the resend feature so they go to the computer that didn't get them so that another entry isn't needed. They have mentioned a problem because the server is crashing due to too many units reporting from a single cruncher at once because it is a 32 bit machine, they are migrating to a 64 bit machine which will prevent the crash.

gotta love all the people trying to armchair-manage this issue from hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away. once a problem occurs, these people come out of the woodwork saying "do this," or "do that," as if the berkeley folks have no clue what they're doing.

So if it's a ghost problem or some other issue with the db, it still comes back to insufficient storage space for the current number of 'in the wild' wu's.

As for armchair managing... not telling them 'do this' or 'do that', guess I'm just asking what's the what and how they are going to tackle the current real issue. Those are the only two solutions I can see, however, if there are others then lets hear them. Might give people a mental jog to come up with whatever solution is actually needed... or might not. But it'll give us something to discuss in the mean time.

Jeff........
I would simply like to say that you have just been a GOD over the last few weeks with your outpouring of information to us all here.

Communication from the project has never been this forthcoming.

I just wanted to let you know how much it is appreciated by us out here in Setiland.
Everybody seems to be able to pipe up when they have something to bitch about, but all too few manage to post when things are going in a positive direction.

And this project right now is going in a VERY positive direction.

The kitties and I are very proud to be a part of it, and wish to thank you for helping us to know what is going on in the background.

Jeff........
I would simply like to say that you have just been a GOD over the last few weeks with your outpouring of information to us all here.

Communication from the project has never been this forthcoming.

I just wanted to let you know how much it is appreciated by us out here in Setiland.
Everybody seems to be able to pipe up when they have something to bitch about, but all too few manage to post when things are going in a positive direction.

And this project right now is going in a VERY positive direction.

The kitties and I are very proud to be a part of it, and wish to thank you for helping us to know what is going on in the background.

Meow meow.

3 days since last info. I guess here the second work day they most know more precisely what's up and what's needs to be done.

So I'm humbly (lol) asking for a few words like "we're almost ready to go, maybe a few hours yet" or "we're still facing problems, it will most likely take a few days yet".

This would take about 1-2 minutes, so well don't think I'm being unreasonably.

3 days since last info. I guess here the second work day they most know more precisely what's up and what's needs to be done.

So I'm humbly (lol) asking for a few words like "we're almost ready to go, maybe a few hours yet" or "we're still facing problems, it will most likely take a few days yet".

This would take about 1-2 minutes, so well don't think I'm being unreasonably.

Well they did post that the usual outage from tuesday morning had started, so there is your situation report right there.
I am then guessing they just left the servers off completely to have more leisure time to find the problem.

personally, i would have liked to get new tasks by now, but it seems that won't happen till atleast friday evening or maybe saturday morning when the servers stop choking on requests. well if they do stop choking at all so soon, i mean there is gonna be thousands of hungry clients aching for wu's friday. also this heavily depends if they can get it all up and running by then.

I had my suspicions monday, so i have been turning my pc off at night so i dont run completely out of wu's too fast, still got about 30 left, looking forward to, when jeff and co. whips the servers back on :)

If they say something needs fixing and they're working on it then i believe we should just wait, safe in the knowledge Matt and the team know exactly what they are doing and how to obtain optimal results.
As for how long it might take...well how long is a piece of string?
It will take as long as it takes and we will wait for the green light in the full and certain knowledge they will get it sorted a.s.a.p.
Relax people.....there again i am British and we are a very patient lot :-)