Reminds me of 1999 and Seattle. I followed the protests closely, and I agreed with most of the criticisms of those who protested. The number one criticism was that the WTO functions in a highly undemocratic way. I could not agree more.

Free trade is sound economic theory. But its political application has been failing. In the American context, the Republicans push for free trade and vigorously work against both education and health. The Democrats are not creative and bold enough on education and health.

The diagram above is my way of saying the economy, be it micro, macro, or globo, has three broad components. Financial capital, physical capital, and human capital. So far the free traders have only been concerned about the financial capital part. The most ignored has been the human capital part. That fundamental imbalance hurts the cause of free trade.

There are several aspects to the human capital part. Education and health are the obvious ones. But there should also be talk of migration. The rich countries should be more welcoming of immigrants. Labor mobility has to be better channelled.

Another is the politics of farm subsidies. Free trade asks for those to be reduced and finally ended in the rich countries. But so far the rich countries have been resisting for political reasons.

So I don't think if the question is if free trade is good or bad. The question is are the political aspects of free trade being handled well. Short answer: no.

And when you expand free trade onto countries that have autocratic, unresponsive governments, you end up with multi-nationals looting the local resources and giving back little in return. Spread of democracy is key to the future of free trade.