Puttting the 71" kit in my 70, does the plastic or carbon box get glued to the plate or is just bolted on when putting on the landing gear.

Thanks
gofly

carbon channel with rods going through it are glued to formers where possible, then the ply gear plate glued to that... with the landing gear holes drilled through both and clamping both. That's off the top of my head, but sounds about right... in short, glue where possible.

carbon channel with rods going through it are glued to formers where possible, then the ply gear plate glued to that... with the landing gear holes drilled through both and clamping both. That's off the top of my head, but sounds about right... in short, glue where possible.

Thanks -- Putting the 71" kit in the 70" plane, pretty smooth it all seems to go together with no modifications.

The landing gear section (the bulks and all) is wider on the 71 than the 70. Other than that they are the same. I went to use the top section and bottom plate of the 70 motor box on my 71 but only could use the front section b/c once it got to the landing gear bulks it was different. Thats why I just redid my motor box with the 71 kit (so it would be right)

Buckhuck, buckhuck1.5 or 300shp that is the question. i'm really thinking about the 1.5 but i would like to with the omega 103. has anyone tried it and how is vertical performance. looking for a little longer flight times and lighter weight for 2200's

Buckhuck, buckhuck1.5 or 300shp that is the question. i'm really thinking about the 1.5 but i would like to with the omega 103. has anyone tried it and how is vertical performance. looking for a little longer flight times and lighter weight for 2200's

awsome video. is that the 2818 extreme flight and are you flying 3 cell 2200's. If so looks like it had plenty of power and good flight time. tail heavy does'nt bother me as long as the plane does'nt go for the sky when inverted.