Friday, December 25, 2015

In honor of the Birth of the One we commemorate on this day, I share the following:

I recall the first time I heard the song, "Mary Did you Know?”
(link provided below), it was a heart-heavy night in 1997. A Saturday December
night, and I arrived home from doing weekly grocery shopping; and my husband,
John, was watching a Christmas Concert.

Just as I walked in, Kathy Mattea had taken to center stage.
For a moment after applause, silence, then, the first cords, words, stanza of
the song: “Mary did you know.”

Since the first December in which I shared my life with my
son, heavy-with-child I was then, him in my womb; followed by Decembers multiplied,
that led to years in which miles separated us Christmas season, sometimes Christmas day; thus, like my womb that first
enwrapped my son; December seemed naturally-designated for wrapping-up,
safe-guarding, and when possible making, memories.

Thus, that December night, as I first heard the song, “Mary
did you know?” the flood flowed free from my dam of memories.

How could it not?

The song speaks of a momma, a momma heavy-with-child. Any
woman who has ever known the honor of the Creator of all things, entrusting you
with a helpless-at-first, fragile, precious tender life knows, the heart of a
momma, during pregnancy, is a heart under cultivation. It’s tender. At least
such was so in my heart.

It was a heart, one surrendered to the plows, the rakes,
then the spikes passing through it; it was a heart you prayed, that, like the
pre-winter fields plowed, raked, furrowed, and seeded, your heart would likewise
be ridded of the rocks, the hardness, the boulders that would harm full growth
of the seeds the Sower sowed.

Any man who has ever loved a woman with child, he also
knows, not only is a child in the making in the womb of that woman, but the
vessel housing that child is likewise a woman under construction. Thus, day by
day, on the two lives (minimally two lives…), the hand of the Potter works.

What’s more, if the natural process of such a miraculous concept—the
concept, in short, of how fearfully and wonderfully we are made—functions normally,
one soon learns, as the embryo gradually becomes a fetus; with sprouting limbs,
to those added, feet, toes, hands and fingers; those hands, become the Hands of God.

Thus, the hand, which, directed by his sight which zeros in
on your hand, your fingers; shakenly reaches for them, then with his tiny
fingers firmly grips one of your fingers; that little hand that does likewise
to the painted wooden camel, pig, dog, and kitten in the mobile that hangs
above his bassinet; becomes, unquestionably, the Hand of God.

And with the same firmness that little hand grips the finger
it reached for, or the wooden animal it reached for, so too becomes the grip of
the Hand of God on your life, via the hand—the life—of your child.

It’s a hand that forever forms you. Sculptors your days.

Unique, paramount, to say the least, was the above miracle
of life experienced by Mary the Mother of Jesus. In line with the above delineated
miracle, the song, “Mary did you know,”
speaks to the details of not only the forming hands then in her womb, but also
to the work of that forming “Hand” throughout Mary’s life.

The song speaks of the outcome of one day specifically.

That being the day in the life of the one called “favored by
God above all other women,” a day decreed
in which that “Hand” would allow--by a plan made, the Bible tells us, before
the foundations of our world were set—in a “moment” in which “Satan’s power reigns
supreme,” “a sword” thrust through Mary’s
soul. (Luke 22:53, Ibid, 2:34, respectively.)

“Mary did you know,” goes the song, “Your baby boy will one
day walk on water? Mary did you know that your baby boy, will give save our
sons and daughters? Did you know, your baby boy has come to make you new? Did
you know, this child you are delivering will soon deliver you?”

How many a life of a young girl, young woman, gone astray,
has the child in her womb, used by the Hand that formed all life and creation, be
a child that makes her new, the child that that momma delivers and in so doing,
in time, she herself knows “deliverance.”

Therefore, to that song, my favorite Christmas song, in my
favorite rendition of that song:

Thursday, December 17, 2015

“ are
sickened
by blatant manifestations of
hatred and intolerance,
including by public figures in
response to terrorist attacks
by violent extremists,”.

I refuse to be
sickened, I will not waste a good bowl of bean soup on their
self-righteous AssWholliness. I am
revolted and I raise the impudent digit of contumacious defiance.

Terrorist attacks, those who perpetrate
them and the damnable doctrines which motivate them are and must remain
objects of hatred, execration, condemnation & contempt.

Tolerance and respect, like credit, are
two way streets. "Credit is given where credit is due; we pay cash and
so will you." applies to tolerance and respect. Islam and
Muslims give none and earn none. They are intolerant and unworthy of
respect & tolerance.

Allah and his slaves curse us: 2.89, 9.30. No religion will be accepted
but Islam 3.85. Muslims are the best of
peoples, for the people, as they bring us to Islam with chains on our
necks 3.110, Bukhari 6.60.80.

Dr. Carson rejected the idea of electing
a Muslim to the presidency and with good reason. Islam is not
compatible with our constitution. Islam denies human rights,
equality and dignity. It demands imposition of corporal
punishments. It demands execution of blasphemers and apostates. It
denies freedom of religion.

Dr. Carson called for leaving Muslim
refugees in their home region, where they belong. While
terrorists have masqueraded as refugees to get into Paris and slaughter
innocent people. every Muslim is an existential threat to the extent
that he believes in Allah, his imperatives, threat and promise.
Keeping them out is the right thing to do.

Donald Trump called for a moratorium on
Islamic immigration, and with good reason. Islamic migrants
are an enemy fifth column, not refugees. They come as parasites and
conquerers, not to assimilate. Its Hijra, stupid; what Moe
did to Yatthrib.

Senator Ted Cruz also wants to leave the
Muslims in their home region. He also called for carpet bombing ISIS.
Both with good reason.

Phobia implies irrational fear. There is
nothing irrational about fearing and hating those Hellbent on
our destruction, commissioned by their deity to conquer and
dominate the world. Allah commands Muslims to "strike terror", "terrify thereby" and make a "great slaughter", killing and
wounding "many of them". He cast terror,
giving Muslims victory thereby. Its in their canonical books,
which have been translated into our language and uploaded to the web so
we can read them. Carson, Cruz & trump should read them and get
a clue. They should call the enemy what it is: Islam, not
"radical Islamic terrorism", which implies the existence of an anodyne
and benevolent Islam which does not exist. 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

Dr. Carson, Senator Cruz & Mr.
Trump have a first amendment free speech clause right to criticize and
condemn Islam. So do I, and I exercise it. The founders knew
that free speech is necessary to open debate in a representative
republic. We must be at liberty to learn and share the truth about
existential threats including but not limited to Islam.

Islamic law says that the minimum annual
jihad requirement is one military expedition in every
year but more is better. It says that, if jihad is neglected
in a year when it is possible, all who know of the obligation are in
sin. The Book Of Jihad has Imam Al-Shafi'i's infamous fiqh
is more legible form. Reasonable, open mined men of good will read it
and curse Islam.

"Particularly the deliberate
and dangerous spread of
misinformation and the
manipulation of
people’s fears and concerns for political gain.”

Shrub & Obamination lied for political
gain. Shrub said "Islam is a great religion of peace.". He lied. Islam
is permanent war. Obamination said "We are not at war with Islam."
Islam is waging war against us and we need to reciprocate and
exterminate it.

Dr. Carson, Senator Cruz & Mr.
Trump lie about Islam by obfuscation: they do not state the
fatal facts as I have done above. There is no "violent
extremism" or "radical Islam" there is only Islam, as Moe preached and
practiced it in the 7th century.

"The Special Advisers
strongly and unreservedly condemn all criminal attacks by violent
extremists, wherever they may take
place. They underline, however, the damaging effects of
linking such attacks to a specific population, based on its identity,
as doing so has resulted in discrimination and targeting of Muslim
population."

"Violent
extremists" is an accursed lie. The attacks in Paris and San
Bernardino were carried out by believing Muslims, not extremists. The
words and works of the founder of Islam are normative, not
extreme. Moe set the standard; deliberately building a reputation for
barbarian rapine by assassinations, pillage and genocide.

Recent United Nazi resolutions reaffirm "that terrorism
cannot
and should not be associated with any religion, nationality,
civilization or ethnic group,". Who but Muslims engage in
Islamic
terrorism? When you hear hoof beats, do you expect the
arrival of
unicorns? When you hear of a terrorist attack, do you
assume it was carried out by Christians?

Terrorism is linked to Islam by its canonical books. The
Qur'an
has Allah saying that he would and did cast terror, resulting in
victory over Jews. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
What the Hell part of that is beyond your intellectual
capacity
to comprehend?

Are Mafia members
discriminated against when suspected of extortion and smuggling?
Neither are Muslims discriminated against by the sure
knowledge
that members of their ummah perpetrated a
mass
killing.

Muslims must be removed and
excluded from Dar ul-Harb because each one of them is a potential
terrorist, only awaiting the confluence of Iman and the call to jihad.
The MINO can become a Believer and join the jihad at any
time,
without warning.

Go to "The Book Of
Jihad", linked above, and read about the fard of jihad. When we
retaliated against Afghanistan, it converted from fard al-kifaya to
fard al-ayn. The obligation to wage war against us is now individually
binding on every Muslim wheresoever dispersed over the face of the
earth. Each Muslim is obligated to do whatever he can to injure or enrage us; to punish us for not being Muslims.
Allowing the like of Syed Farook to reside among us
is suicidal insanity.

"The Special Advisers
recalled that any “advocacy of national,
racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence” is prohibited under
international human rights law and by the national
laws or
constitutions of many countries."

I call CamelShit!
When Geert Wilders published Fitna, Ban Ki-moon used that
malignant language to condemn it as incitement to hatred and
violence. Arrogant AssWholes
equate exposure of evil with evil. Wilders simply shows you
the
Qur'an verses that incite hatred & violence and the
Imams who
rouse the rabble by preaching them in their mosques.

ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG require that Islam be proscribed by law for
violating human rights, warmongering & inciting
genocide, but the Secretary General wants to ban Fitna
instead.

Reuters quotes U.N.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no
justification for hate speech or incitement to violence," Ban said in a
statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."

In
recent weeks, there have
been
numerous acts of intimidation
and
violence against Muslims and
Muslim
sites, including vandalism of
mosques
as well as discriminatory,
xenophobic and
racist statements. Some of these
statements
have referred to all Muslims -
and all
refugees and asylum seekers originating from Syria and Iraq -
as
“terrorists.”

There is no excuse for
unprovoked insult & assault against anyone, Muslim or not.
There is
no excuse for vandalism & arson. Those are crimes. I
neither
advocate nor incite them. If mentally unstable individuals
commit
such acts when outraged about Islamic terrorism, that is not the fault
of those of us who expose it.

Islam is
not a race. You can not change your race. Ayaan Hirsi Ali remains Black
after apostatizing. Dougie Hooper remains White after reverting. Race
is immaterial to the issue at hand. AssWholes play the race
card as a tool for squelching debate.

Islam began as an Arab Mafia but it conquered and subsumed Asians,
Blacks and Caucasians. Its multi racial. Exposing, condemning
and
objecting to Islam is not racist. There is no element of
bigotry
or racism in fact based declarations that Muslims should not be
admitted to America or elected to high office.

Christian and Yazidi refugees from Iraq & Syria are not
terrorists.
Muslims are. Muslims are obligated to obey Allah and emulate
his
Messenger. Allah commanded them to "strike terror", "terrify"
prospective enemies and "fight those of the disbelievers nearest you.
Moe was "made victorious with terror". Muslims are
told in 33.21, to emulate him. Obedient
Muslims are terrorists. Islam entails terrorism. AssWholes, like LibTards and other
analencephalopaths, can't comprehend that because they do not use their
brains.

Therefore, killing you and fighting
you, destroying you and terrorizing you,
responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be
great legitimate duty in our religion.

What part of terrorizing you
is a great legitimate duty in Islam do you not comprehend?!

"Refugees from Syria and
Iraq are fleeing precisely
the kind of violence that we in the West also fear. To turn
them away when they are seeking refuge is an affront to our common
humanity.”

The AssWholes
played the guilt card. Two of the terrorists who attacked Paris were
"Syrian refugees" . That is ample cause for telling them to
stay
home.

"At this time when the
world is facing complex challenges, including confronting extremist
violent groups and individuals, Governments and other leading actors in
society should publiclycounter lies, prejudice and fear”

Islam is the violent group; the rest are subsets of Islam,
undifferentiated from it in any significant way. This blog
post
is countering lies & prejudice with facts. Fear is a
natural
result of terrorism, both the end and the means Muslims seek
to
impose. That fear must motivate citizens to demand that Islam
be
outlawed and Muslims expelled and excluded.

Current immigration law permits exclusion of subversive and violent
enemies. The constitution is not a suicide pact. Freedom of
religion does not extend to attacking, killing, enslaving, plundering,
raping and enslaving non-believers, all of which are entailed by Islam.
Where you find the right to perform such acts, there you will find the
right to manifest, practice & propagate Islam; not in our
constitution!

Sunday, December 13, 2015

“verily I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW)
[said]; (Nay, not so) but a Muslim.”

Seed thought: What is a Muslim? What is a believer? Is there
a difference between the two? Additionally, what does Islam demand of the
Muslim, the believer?

Following, the words of the men of wisdom in Islam, and the
words of the alleged founder of Islam, so too, the words of a former Muslim,
respond in full to the above queries:

Sa’d narrated it on the authority
of his father (Abi Waqqas) who said: The Messenger of Allah (SAW) distributed
shares (of booty amongst his Companions). I said: Messenger of Allah! Give it
to so and so for verily he is a believer.
The Apostle of Allah said: Or a Muslim? I (the narrator) repeated it
(the word “believer”) thrice and he (the Holy Prophet) turned it back upon me
(and substituted the word ) “Muslim”….

It was narrated on the authority of
Sa’d that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) bestowed upon a group of persons
(things), and Sa’d was sitting amongst them. Sa’d said: The Messenger of Allah
ignored some of them. And he who was ignored appeared to be more deserving in
my eyes (as compared with others). I (Sa’d) said: Messenger of Allah! Why is it
you did not give to such and such (man)? Verily I see him a believer. The
Messenger of Allah (saw)said: Or a Muslim? I kept quiet for some time but I was
again impelled (to express) what I knew about him. I said: Messenger of Allah! Why is it you did not give to such and such
(man)? Verily, by Allah, I see him a
believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: (Nay, not a believer) but a
Muslim. He (Sa’d) said: I again kept quiet for some time but what I knew about
him again impelled me (to express my
opinion) and I said: Why is it that you did not give (the share) to so and so:
By Allah, verily I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) [said] ;
(Nay, not so) but a Muslim.” (Ibid, P.
125, [#150R1].)

Footnotes thereat provide the following exegesis on the
above-cited ahadith: “ A muslim [sic] is he who makes profession of Islam, but
the believer is one who believes in
Islam from the depth of his heart.” (Ibid.)

The exegesis further asserts, deducing from the ahadith, that
not always is a muslim a believer, but always is a believer a muslim.

Hence this: “And if any fail to judge by the light of what Allah has
revealed, they are no better than unbelievers.”
(Qur’an 5:47) In other words, if they fail to judge by what Allah has
revealed they are not Believers but rather unbelievers.

Therefore this:
“No, by your Lord, they are not believers until they make you their judge in
the disputes that break out between them, and then find no resistance, (nor any
doubt or constriction), within themselves to what you decide but submit
themselves completely (and will obey your judgments without question).

Hence this: “It
is narrated on the authority of Al-‘Abbas b. ‘Abdul-Muttalib that he heard the
Messenger of Allah saying: He relished the flavour [sic] of faith that who
became pleased with Allah as Lord, with al-Islam as a code of life and with
Muhammad as a Messenger (of Allah). (Muslim, Ibid. P. 57, [# 34].)

On behalf of the
revered scholars of Islam, footnotes thereat read as follows:

Sincere attachment to Allah, Islam and the Holy Prophet is the sum and
substance of faith….It is an attitude of mind which is formed by willing
adherence to Allah, His Apostle and the code of life which he has given to the
human race….

To be pleased with Al-Islam as the code of life implies that whatever
Islam has laid down for a believer by way of spiritual guidance or practical
legislation should be looked upon as the timeless expression of God’s will and
should be willingly and cheerfully put into practice.

To be pleased with Muhammad (SAW) as the Messenger of Allah is
indicative of the fact that it is through Muhammad that God’s will has been made
known to us. He is the bearer of revelation and is, therefore, best fitted and
divinely authorized to tell the human race how Allah is to be loved and obeyed
and how his pleasure can be rightly sought for and how his laws can be applied
in practical life. Thus without showing obedience to Muhammad and following him
sincerely and earnestly we cannot obey our Lord. (Ibid. FN, #3, 4, 5,
respectively.)

For such reasons,
with confidence, the so-called Messenger of Allah declared, “None of you is a
believer till I am dearer to him than his child, his father, and the whole of
mankind.” (Ibid, P. 62, [#44R1].)

Therefore, this
exegesis on the above just-cited hadith from the men of knowledge in Islam:

“…the Holy Prophet ….in his personality … we can know the will of the
Lord….He has been, therefore, made for us the focus of loyalty because it is
through him that we have learnt the true concept of God, the real implications
of Tauhid, the role of man …. In fact the whole of the religion. It is Muhammad
(SAW)… He is [sic] central figure in Islam: that is the reason why the Qur’an
says, “ If you love Allah, follow me: Allah will love you….” (Ibid, FN #1.)

Therefore this
command: “O you who believe, raise not your voices above the Prophet’s voice,
nor speak loudly to him….”(49:2.)

Therefore, this
exegesis on that just-cited Qur’anic verse: “ The scholars of Islam have stated
in connection with this verse that here voice also means opinion and judgement
and no Muslim is allowed to consider his judgement and opinion to be more sound
and correct in comparison to the verdict of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon
him). (Ibid. Muslim, Vol. IV. P.94, FN.)

Hence, the
Qur’an instructs, “Obey Allah and the Messenger so that perhaps you will gain
mercy.” (3: 132.) It tells us, “Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah.”
(4:80.) It warns, “Those who [disagree and oppose] Allah and His Messenger will
be subdued and overcome as those before them were also subdued and overcome
[when they opposed their Messengers before]…. The unbelievers will have a
humiliating punishment.” (58: 5)

That provided, we
move forward: last week, on Mark’s Levin’s show, I heard him interview Andy
McCarthy. In that interview, McCarthy made solid arguments in defense of the
“Trump Call” with respect to Muslims.

Having heard Mark
mention an article McCarthy had written on the subject, having great respect
for both, McCarthy and his work, I chased the article down (link to it provided
below). Read it. Agreed with it in many instances.

However, with
respect to the idea McCarthy seems to support, what I call the myth of two
Islams--one that the “extremist” follow, the other, the one the Moderates
follow; therefore, the myth that, with respect to Believers in the way of
Muhammad, there are Moderates and Extremist—that I strongly disagree with.

Because as long as we allow that myth life; then here in our nation,
Islamic schools will teach the children
the of the “Believers” the tenets of the only Islam there is, which is the
Islam I have studied since 9/11, the Islam the “sacred Texts” of Islam
disclose, the Islam the “Prophet Muhammad” brought, lived and defined.

Therefore, as is
always so, to check my thoughts against not only the best-versed on Islam, but
also against one born and raised in both an Islamic nation and community, I was
thankful to have at e-mail’s length, the input of my mentor in Islam, former
Bangladeshi Muslim, “Abul Kasem.” He is one born and raised in the faith he
now—as he has done for the past two decades of more—with his “pen, and, I note,
his needed pen-name, via the net, teaches and exposes true basic Islam. And to
stay alive, with the recent chopping to death of “anti-Islam” Bangladeshi
former Muslim bloggers, AK dares not visit his homeland.

Many readers of
Jihad Watch very likely have read his work at Islam Watch: the work of “Abul
Kasim.”

Because AK is not
only my mentor in Islam, but has also become a friend I cherish, one whose
input on Islam I count as second to none, I quickly sent him the above-mentioned
article, requested he comment on it.

Here follows,
those comments:

Dear DL;

I am replying in a hurry, because we are
going on a holiday trip.

The shortest answer will be:

It is impossible to have moderate Muslims
in the absence of a moderate Quran.

Those who claim to be moderate are
actually hypocrites and opportunists, dishonest and practice takiyya and
kitman. Actually, they are more dangerous than the Jihadists.

Good Muslims are the ones who are honest,
and truly live by the words of the Quran and Sunna.

Those veering from the above tenets are
bad Muslims--or not Muslims at all. But they are afraid to declare their
apostasy for fear of facing the wrath of good Muslims.

Much of what is stated the in the
essay is true and shows the scope and ferocity of Islam.

Donald Trump's idea deserves some
merit. The only point is that he should distinguish between bad Muslims
and good Muslims. I think, US should only accept very bad Muslims--.
Allowing these bad Muslims protection for their apostasy. They will be allies.
The US must stop admitting the good and moderate Muslims.

Sincerely;

AK

Thank you,
Abul. To our peril we disregard his words.

That
stated, to the above and to this conversation I add the following:

Too often
among us, well-intended regard-worthy individuals, but individuals,
nonetheless, less then deep-versed on Islam, assert—in the words of the
inimitable regard-worthy American treasure, Mark Levin—“Shari ‘ah Law is
incompatible with a constitutional Republic,” which is a categorical correct
indisputable provable assertion; but they fail to realize Shari ‘ah is Islam.

Islam is
Qur’an and Sunnah, and the consensus of the scholars, as long as that consensus
agrees in full with the former; congruently—as in “coinciding on all points
when superimposed”--Shari ‘ah is Qur’an and Sunnah, and the consensus of the
scholars, as long as that consensus agrees in full with Qur’an and Sunnah.
Failing that accordance there is no consensus, there is no Shari ‘ah.

Islam is
Shari ‘ah, Shari ‘ah is Islam.

And of
Shari ‘ah Levin additionally accurately asserted, not only is it “incompatible
with a constitutional Republic,” but, “Shari ‘ah must be used to impose the
will of that faith on all countries and on all peoples.” (Levin show, 10
December 2014: 47:20.)

Yes,
Indeed, Levin, and Shari ‘ah is Islam—there is no daylight, between them
because they are one and the same.

Hence this
Qur’anic exegesis from revered Islamic works:

The Authority of the Holy Prophet extends to all times …. The verdict
of the sacred Law left by him, is nothing but his own verdict. Therefore, the
rule reigns supreme right through the Last Day, the rule that guidance should
be sought by turning directly to the Holy Prophet, during his blessed lifetime,
and after him, one must turn to his Shariah which is, in all reality, a return
to him, may Allah bless him for ever and ever.

“Moderates,”
“Reformers” assert they reject the doctrine of stoning for adultery. They
reject the doctrine of death for the apostate to Islam, they reject violent
jihad, they reject the doctrine of the Caliphate, the ruling of Shari ‘ah, and
on and on, naming one after the other of the doctrines and traditions of the
“prophet of Islam”—Sunnah! Sunnah that Islam claims is equal to Qur’an, part of
“what Allah has revealed.”

Surely,
these “Moderates” and “Reformers” know, rejecting sunnah, Islam asserts, is
tantamount to apostasy. It is repudiating Islam in its entirety.

Self-claimed
so-called “Moderates” and/or “Reformer” Muslims state, the Qur’an, and their
“prophet,” in numerous passages and incidents, provide good peaceable guidance.
Indeed, no argument there--where the guidance in the Qur’an and the same in the
sunnah of their “prophet” provides guidance and instructions from the unaltered
teachings of the Hebrew Scripture and of the New Testament, such is indeed,
minimally, good guidance.

The problem
is Islam disallows the believer to choose which words, practices, and
judgments of their “prophet” they wish to follow and which they elect to
repudiate and disregard.

Once more,
heed the words of the revered scholars of Islam:

“The explanatory role of the Sunnah
in relation to the Qur’an has been determined by the Qur’an itself, where we
read in an address to the Prophet in sura al-Nahl (16:44): ‘We have sent down
to you the Remembrance so that you may explain to the people what has been
revealed to them.”

Tasfir Al-Jalalyn renders and amplifies the just cited
allegedly Allah to Muhammad communication this way: “We have sent down the
reminder [(The Qur’an)] to you so that you may make clear to mankind what has
been sent down to them [regarding the lawful and unlawful--] so that perhaps
they will reflect [on that and take note].

In other words, according to Qur’anic teaching, Allah elected to use the life of “his messenger”
Muhammad to show “believers” the actions Allah wanted to see in and from his
body of Believers, which were actions seen and enacted in the life of “His
Messenger, Muhammad”; acts of others praised by the same.

Because, as spoken to in earlier citations herein, “it is through Muhamad that God’s will has
been made known to us,” assert the revered Islamic scholars. “He is the bearer
of revelation and,” therefore, teaches, via his life, the believer what acts
earn “Allah’s pleasure” and approval, and “how his laws can be applied in ,
practical life. “ (Muslim. Vol. I, FN.)

For that reason, this
assertion and warning in the revered work of Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi’s,
Mariful Qur’an tasfir, expounding on that same verse, under the heading, “
Hadith is Necessary to Understand Qur’an: The Rejection of Hadith is Really the
Rejection of the Qur’an."

He follows that warning up with the following:

“And We sent down the Message
(adh-dhikr: The Qur’an) so that you explain to the people,” means, by
consensus, the Holy Qur’an—and, in this verse, the Holy Prophet has been given
the assignment of explaining the meaning of verses revealed to him before
people. Herein lies an open proof that the correct understanding of the
realities, insights and injunctions of the Holy Qur’an depends on the statement
of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad al-Mustafa…..

In Al-Muwafqat, Allamah Shatibi has
provided detailed proof that the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet, the whole of it,
is the explanation of the Book of Allah because the Qur’an has said about the
Holy Prophet (And surely you are at the height of a sublime nature [64:4]) and
which was explained by Sayyidah ‘Aishah by saying: (The Qur’an was his sublime
nature). Thus, the outcome is that every word and deed which provenly [sic]
issued forth from the Holy Prophet is nothing but what was said by the
Qur’an….This is because according to the
clarification of the Qur’an nothing he says is prompted by his personal desire,
instead, it is a Wahy (revelation) from Allah Ta ‘ala: (and nor does he talk
from desire. It is nothing but a revelation revealed—[ 53: 3-4]) This tells us that
all acts of worship, dealings with people, personal morals and habits of the
Holy Prophet were, all of them, through Divine revelation and have the same
authority as that of the Qur’an.

(Mariful Qur’an,Vol. 5, [16: 43-44], P.
363-364.)

In other words, as the Qur’an bears out, according to Islam,
Muhammad was sent to explain that in the Qur’an to humanity; to provide, via
his life, words, approval, and disapproval; clarity on all messages and tenets
contained in the Qur’an. We find most of those clarifications and object
lessons in ahadith, sira, and tafsir. Also in fiqh—jurisprudence, because the
Qadis and Scholars that have contributed to that in Islamic Jurisprudence, have
only been allowed to contribute to Islamic Law (Shariah) that which agrees in
full with that found in the former sources—Qur’anic, ahadith, sira, tafsir.

For that reason, “No,
by your Lord, they are not believers until they make you their judge in the
disputes that break out between them, and then find no resistance, (nor any
doubt or constriction), within themselves to what you decide but submit
themselves completely (and will obey your judgments without question). (An-Nisa
[4:65],Tafsir Al-Jalalayn.)

For such reasons,
as spoken to in the opening line of this post, “verily,” asserted Sa’d
ibn Waqqas, “I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) [said] ; (Nay,
not so) but a Muslim.”

“No, by your
Lord, they will not believe until they ask you to judge between them in what
they disagree about and then they shall find in themselves no impediment
touching your verdict, but shall surrender in full submission.” (4:64)

Thus this
addition, per Muhammad ibn at-Tirmidhi: “ ‘To take the Messenger as a model
means to emulate him, follow his sunna and abandon opposition to him in either word
or action.’ Several commentators said words to that effect.”

Endless are the
texts from authoritative Islamic sources that substantiate and corroborate my
above assertions. Nonetheless, for the sake of brevity here, in this post,
aiming to wind this up, I limit that from the established word of Qur’an and
Sunnah to the following example of the indispensable necessity for all
believers to accept, to the negation of all other opinions and rulings, the
judgement, the guidance, the opinion of the “prophet.”

Why such focus on
this man’s life?

For the reasons
borne out above: if we are to know what to expect from the life of believers in
the “religion” of Muhammad that live among us and elsewhere, we must study and
know Muhammad’s actions, because, it is those actions, all of them, every
believer is Allah-ordered to obey and mimic.

“Bishr [‘who
called himself a Muslim’] … got into a dispute with a Jew,” the report states
and “The Jew said, ‘let us go to Muhammad and let him settle our
dispute.’” (Mariful Qur’an, Vol.
2, p. 481.)

The narrative
relates Bishr (whom the narrative calls “a pretending Muslim”) then posed a “counter-proposal”
to the Jews suggestion, suggesting they rather seek the judgment of Jewish
tribal chief, Ka ‘b ibn Ashraf, who was, no less, “a sworn enemy of the Holy
Prophet and his Muslim followers.” After further discussion on the matter, the
two men finally agreed upon the original suggestion of the Jew—seek the verdict
of the “Prophet.”

Thus, they did
just that. The “Prophet” gave his decision in the favor of the Jew. That, of
course, left Bishr dissatisfied. His dissatisfaction thereat spurred him to
suggest yet another option: take the case to Umar, one well known for his
harshness on unbelievers.

Tafsir tells, the
two “reached Sayyadna Umar.” The Jew
relayed all the details of the case to Umar, as well as informing him, they had
already submitted the case to the Prophet, received his verdict on it, but how
Bishr was dissatisfied with the Prophet’s verdict.

Upon hearing
such, Umar “asked Bishr, ‘Is this what really happened?’” Bishr confirmed such
was so. At that point, Umar instructed the two to wait right where they stood.
Turning on his heels, he went to his house, and tafsir provides, Umar returned
“with a sword which he swung to finish the hypocrite off, saying: ‘this is the
decision for him who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Holy Prophet.’”
(ibid, p.482.)

(Tafsir
al-Jalalayn relays the same account, stating, “so ‘Umar killed him.” Tafsir ibn
Kathir puts Umar’s actions in highlight here this way: “’Umar … struck the head
of the man who rejected the Prophet’s decision with the sword and killed him.”

The narrative
goes on to tell, how when the relatives of Bishr heard about the incident, they
filed a suit against Umar accusing him of wrongfully killing a Muslim—“without
adequate legal authority as admitted by the Shariah of Islam.” (ibid.)

The narrative
tells that in time, after Bishr’s defenders presented all their arguments in
the court of the Prophet, Allah revealed, all those were simply “an exercise in
lying,” and the fact that Bishr rejected the prophets verdict proved Bishr not only a hypocrite but a clear
apostate. Thus, “his being killed by Sayyidna Umar became all the more
justified.” (ibid.)

That narrative
goes on to provide, Umar was absolved of any wrong doing, because, Allah
provided the grounds of justification on
which Umar killed the so-called Muslim—the fact that Bishr rejected the verdict
of the Prophet proved Bishr not a true Muslim but rather an apostate. Thus, the
treatment Umar gave him qualified as Umar simply carrying out Allah’s orders.

It goes on to
state, when Allah thus revealed, “Those are the ones Allah knows what is in
their hearts. So ignore what they are and give them good counsel and speak to
them about themselves,” (ibid, vs 63) in that, Allah instructed the Prophet to
“ignore their excuses and reject their charge of excess against Sayyidna Umar.”

Additionally,
using, if you will, the Bishr object lesson, Allah then instructed his
Messenger to advise them, warn them (“the rest of the hypocrites”), should they
ever be inclined to do as Bishr had done and bypass, reject, be dissatisfied
with the judgment of the Prophet, they too “might as well meet the same fate as
did Bishr, the hypocrite.” (ibid.)

Thus the next
verse revealed buttresses those cited above, with Allah warning and declaring,
“We did not send any Messenger but to be obeyed by the leave of Allah” [4: 64].
Tafsir provides the following clarification for the verse:

It means that any Messenger who was sent by Allah was sent so that
everyone obeys the rules set by him in accordance with the command of Allah
Almighty. In that case, the inevitable consequence [of rejecting those rules]
will be that anyone who opposes the rules set by the Messenger will be dealt
with in the manner disbelievers are dealt with.

How, in the Bishr
object lesson was this disbeliever dealt with? With the sword--wacked to death.

Umar killed the
man that was dissatisfied with the verdict of Muhammad; Allah and his Messenger exonerated Umar in
that murder. On the heels of it, Allah further advised his Messenger to use
this incident to warn others perhaps inclined to do as Bishr had done. Thus,
the ummah has as their pattern and guide on what to do with such “offences,”
this Umar example, which Allah, the Prophet, thus Qur’an, Sunnah, and thus
Islam, declare correct and thus assert Umar righteous in his act therein.

Some may argue,
but the danger of earning the “Bishr reward” for rejecting the verdict of the
Prophet ended with the Prophet’s death. Not so.

Tafsir is clear
on that. So too, Qur’an and Sunnah. As spoken to above, as we will re-read here
shortly.

For that reason
the Qur’an states, just a few verses after those spotlighted above, “Whoever
obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah. (vs. 80.) That precept the Qur’an and
ahadith echo throughout. One can in fact state, absent that basis precept,
Islam collapses.

In other words,
Islam is just that—following the judgments, teachings, advice and examples of
the Arabian Prophet. And that is precisely what Muslims who are also Believers
in the way of Muhammad do.

Once more in
closing: “So never, by your Lord, never shall they become believers unless they
make you the judge in the disputes which arise between them, then find no
discomfort in their hearts against what you have decided and surrender to it in
total submission. (4: 65)

Tafsir provides
clarification on that stating, “Not accepting the decision of the Prophet is Kufr.”

(kufr: disbelief,
to cover up the truth, to reject Allah and refuse to believe that Muhammad is
His Messenger.)

Tafsir further clarifies, “Allah Almighty proclaims that
nobody can become a Muslim unless he accepts the verdict of the Holy Prophet
willingly, calmly, and fully to the extent that there remains even in his heart
not the slightest strain because of this verdict.” (Mariful Qur’an, ibid
[Vol.II], p. 487.)

That seems rather clear.

Tafsir goes on to state, because the “Holy Prophet is not
only the ruler of the state, he is a Messenger of Allah, protected against sins
by Him,” as such, the believer, if a true Muslim at all, is “duty bound to make
the Holy Prophet the arbitrator and judge and have him give the final verdict.”
Then it adds, “And once the verdict has been given by him, let them all accept
it whole-heartedly [sic] and act accordingly.” (Mariful Qur’an, ibid, p. 487.)

As mentioned above, one may argue the authority of the
“Prophet’s” verdicts ended with his death. As stated above, not so. As Qur’an
and Sunnah assert consistently. Once more therefore to Qur’anic tafsir:

The Authority of the Holy Prophet extends to all times …. The verdict
of the sacred Law left by him, is nothing but his own verdict. Therefore, the
rule reigns supreme right through the Last Day, the rule that guidance should
be sought by turning directly to the Holy Prophet, during his blessed lifetime,
and after him, one must turn to his Shariah which is, in all reality, a return
to him, may Allah bless him for ever and ever. (MQ, V. 2, P. 487)

The above
presented, I name just a few high-profile examples we have of Good Muslim,
Believers in the way of Muhammad: Osama bin Ladin, Nidal Hasan, the SB
killing-couple; the Leaders, soldiers,
scholars and patrons of Islamic State, just to name a few.

Why did the above
named commit the acts of Jihad they committed? Because they were, are, good
Muslims, true believers in the way of Muhammad, thus, obedient to the dictates
and tenets of Islam, thus conformers to Sunnah.

Concluding here, I so
re-citing these words of my friend Abul:

Good Muslims are the ones who are honest,
and truly live by the words of the Quran and Sunna. Those veering from the
above tenets are bad Muslims--or not Muslims at all. But they are afraid to
declare their apostasy for fear of facing the wrath of good Muslims.

………………..

Donald Trump's idea deserves some
merit. The only point is that he should distinguish between bad Muslims
and good Muslims. I think, US should only accept very bad Muslims--.
Allowing these bad Muslims protection for their apostasy. They will be allies.
The US must stop admitting the good and moderate Muslims.

Friday, December 11, 2015

Earlier
this week, in the wake of the most recent high-profile acts of believers of the
Islamic faith obeying Allah, thus, obeying the command of the central figure of
Islam, its alleged “prophet,” Donald Trump called for a "total and
complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States."

He
asserted, "Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to
anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension." He added, "Where this
hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to
determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our
country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only
in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life."

He
stated, “What's happened is we're out of control. We have no idea who's coming
into our country. We have no idea if they love us or if they hate us.”

He
added to the above, speaking of “Muslims” he knows, “they know we have a
problem. They know we have a real problem.” Trump thus asserted, “We can't put
up with it, folks.”

Therefore,
he calls for a “complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until
our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on.”

We
must find out—and then deal honestly with that that we do discover, I
add--Trump argued, “Where the hatred comes from and why … we're going to have
to figure it out. We have to figure it out,” he presses.

He argues,
“We can't live like this. It's going to get worse and worse. You're going to
have more World Trade Centers. It's going to get worse and worse, folks.”

(http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1512/08/sitroom.01.html)

Small
wonder thus, on the Left, on the Right, the “Lions” among them have risen.

Stirred
they are, roused from their swooning and slumbering in the face of the source
of the Islamic plot and threat against us; at the notion, at the gull, that anyone
would dare table the idea, we seek, find and address the reason for the drive
behind the jihadist that attack our nation, kill our loved ones, ravish our
peace.

Damn
the Soul! They cry. Damn the man, the notion, and all beings in support of him
and it!

How
dare anyone do such a despicable thing! How dare one!

And
what makes it all the more “reprehensible” and “un-American” is, it is not just
anyone who made the above suggestion, it is—all but beyond belief!—one, a
Candidate for the office of the U.S. Presidency.

Therefore,
not the least bit surprising, Senator Lindsey Graham insinuated, he was willing
to do his level best to see to it, that, should Trump somehow become the Nominee on
the Republican ticket, Hilary wins the national election.

Because,
as Lindsey put it, it is one thing to lose an election but quite another to
lose honor.

In
speaking of the said lost honor, I’ve little, if any, doubt Graham speaks with
the absence of first-hand experience of the bitter taste of lost honor suffered
and, what we deduce from his statements, is and would be the sweetness of
“Hillary.”

Therefore,
given the uproar and the “Give us Hillary!” (“Give us Barabbas!) moment that
the Right is now convulsing in; because I know, if the challenge Trump has
tabled is allowed to come to fruition, it will take us directly to the
so-called “sacred” Islamic text; I press we go there.

Because
all—which are many—who have done so know the truth Congress--Left and Right--as
well as the office of the US Presidency seek to obfuscate: the reason for the
hatred is in the said texts.

They know,
if the challenge Trump has tabled is allowed to come to fruition, it will take
us directly into the pages of Qur’an, the pages of sira, the pages of regarded
Islamic tafsir, and into the volumes, chapters, pages and lines of ahadith.

Our
elected officials know, that written in the said text will stand, and on its own, testify to the reason for the hatred in heart, mind, and soul in the
believer in the way of Muhammad. All who have made their journey into
the so-called “sacred texts” of Islam, they know, that written there eradicates both question and puzzlement with respect to the message therein.

Yet
our elected Representatives all but call for Trumps immediate binded-haul to the
guillotine—because they believe we must respect Islam’s so-called “Holy Book,”
thus, so too, its “Holy Prophet.”

But that is a “respect” we can ill-afford to render.

Moreover,
I solemnly warn, should we continue rendering respect to the doctrine of Islam,
and thus protecting that therein from being put, spotlighted, on center stage;
that “respect” rendered will be the death of this nation—time to write
“Ichabod” on District of Columbus signs. Hang the same in New York Harbor.

I doubt that either Cruz or Trump has
read the Qur'an and Sahih Bukhari. I urge all presidential aspirants to
read them and to sample Reliance Of The Traveller.

In the top frame of this blog, you will
find a link to Islam 101 For Politicians. Please
send that link to your favorite candidate. That page contains
embedded pdf files with quotes from and links to the canonical texts
essential to understanding Islam.

Islam stands alone, without modifiers.
Islam is neither moderate, extreme, peaceful nor radical.
It is Islam, Stupid! It is what Moe preached and practiced
1400 years ago: the Qur'an & sunnah, which are codified in
Islamic law.

Islam has five pillars and a peak, which
you never hear about. Jihad is the highest peak of Islam.
There is nothing more important in Islam than Jihad.

Radical, radicalism & radicalization
are false memes contrived to prevent us from understanding the reality
of Islam. Allah is a slave master who demands that his slaves obey his
commands which include:

On Judgment Day, each Muslim will face
Allah, who will hold a scale, weighing the Muslim's sins against his
good deeds. The tilt of the balance determines the Muslim's eternal
destiny: fire or orgy. But Allah, in his
mercy, promises Muslims Brownie Points
for acts intended to injure or enrage disbelievers. Terrorism is
imputed to the terrorist's credit as a righteous good deed!

Muslim immigration is hijra: emulation
of Moe's subversion of Yatthrib, which he renamed Medina.
They come to conquer, not to assimilate.

The only sure way to prevent Islamic
terrorism is to isolate Muslims from us: to expel and exclude them from
Dar ul-Harb. Leave them in or send them back to sand land,
where they belong.

This is not a racial issue.
While Islam began as an Arab Mafia, it has conquered and
subsumed members of several races. Apostates and converts do not change
races, they change affiliations. 'Rass your racist canard!

Phobias are irrational fears.
When a war crime syndicate murders 270 million people in 1400 years,
fearing & loathing it is not irrational, its common sense.
'Rass your Islamophobia
canard!

The Constitution is not a suicide pact.
The First Amendment's Free Exercise clause is for religions, not war
crimes. Where you find a right to attack, kill,
enslave, extort, plunder and rape, there you will find the right to
manifest, practice & propagate Islam, there and nowhere in the
Constitution!

If the assailant's parents had stayed
put in Pakistan, his victims would be alive and healthy today.
14 are dead and 21 wounded because we allow Muslims to
immigrate. Donald Trump is factually correct, not
politically correct. He has the right idea, but I doubt that he knows
why. Because I want you to know, I include links to
further details.

You or
your friends may "know" Muslims who are "wonderful people".
Really? They may be MINOs for the time being, or
they may be Believers exercising their license to deceive you.
But we have neither Muslim friends nor allies. Allah
explicitly forbids Muslims from being in inferior and equal
relationships with kuffar. Search the Qur'an for "take not"
and "as friends". 3.28 is not the only instance, you will
find more in Surahs 4, 5 & 9.

In his Dec. 8 '15 show, Mark Levin had
an excellent rant about the Trump proposal and reactions to it. He also
talked with Andrew McCarthy and Senator Ted Cruz. Please go to his web
site and listen to the show.

Monday, December 07, 2015

Obamination: ISIL Terrorism Strategy
Seventy four years ago, FDR reacted to the attack on Pearl Harbor,
demanding a declaration of war. Seventy years ago, Harry
Truman ended that war by nuking Hiroshima & Nagasaki.
How sad it is that their successors in office are incapable
of learning from their historical examples.

December 6, '15, Obamination spewed shit in
response to the San Bernardino Massacre. That pile of
excrement follows, with my contemptuous commentary in block quotes.

Good evening.
On Wednesday, 14 Americans were killed as they came together to
celebrate the holidays. They were taken from family and friends who
loved them deeply. They were white and black; Latino and Asian;
immigrants and American-born; moms and dads; daughters and sons. Each
of them served their fellow citizens and all of them were part of our
American family.

Nobody can feel the
afflictive dispensation of bereavement and injury as intensely as those
directly involved. Obamination exploits their grief and pain for
political gain, a damnable act of AssWholliness.

Tonight, I
want to talk with you about this tragedy, the broader threat of
terrorism, and how we can keep our country safe.

The
massacre happened because our government allowed enemy combatants to
form a fifth column on our soil. No Muslims, no massacre.
That is all we need to know about it.

The threat
of terrorism: "I will cast terror." Terror, in this
context, implies inescaable impending doom such that children
turn grey, nursing mothers abandon their infants and pregnant women
drop their loads.

The government can do nothing to keep us safe because we are not safe.
Muslims lurk among us. We will not be safe until they are expelled and
excluded.

The FBI is
still gathering the facts about what happened in San Bernardino, but
here is what we know. The victims were brutally murdered and injured by
one of their coworkers and his wife. So far, we have no evidence that
the killers were directed by a terrorist organization overseas, or that
they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home.

It is sufficient to know that Islamic doctrine is the ultimate cause of
the massacre. ISIS propaganda summons Muslims embedded in Dar
ul-Harb to slaughter Harbis, and two of them, damnation be upon them,
did. It is enough, foreign command, direction and local conspiracy are
indifferent except to potential victims who may be next.

But it is
clear that the two of them had gone down the dark path of
radicalization, embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that
calls for war against America and the West.

CamelShit!!!
"Radicalization" is a damnable lie. Terrorism is normative, not
exceptional in Islam. Will cast terror, cast terror, made victorious
with terror... who can get a clue? Click through and read the
ayat & ahadith linked above. Get a clue and curse
Islam.

"Perverted interpretation" is a damnable lie. 8.39 commands
warfare against pagans until only Allah is worshiped. 9.29 commands
warfare against Christians, Jews & Zoroastrians until they are
subjugated and submit to extortion. The sooner the liar goes
to Hell, the better. Read the Qur'an & Sahih Bukhari
to see Moe's interpretation of Islam, the only authentic
interpretation.

They had
stockpiled assault weapons, ammunition, and pipe bombs. So this was an
act of terrorism, designed to kill innocent people.

Acts of terrorism are
designed to inflict terror; to create paranoia & confusion so
as to make normal life impossible and weaken our will to resist.

Our nation
has been at war with terrorists since al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000
Americans on 9/11.

Who were we at
war witth 74 years ago? Was it kamikazes? Was it Panzeers? It
was Imperial Japan and Germany, not individual organizations &
divisions. Islam is at war against us and we need to
reciprocate. We need to eradicate Islam from the face of the
earth because its damnable doctrines perpetuate war.

In the
process, we’ve hardened our defenses — from airports to financial
centers, to other critical infrastructure. Intelligence and law
enforcement agencies have disrupted countless plots here and overseas,
and worked around the clock to keep us safe. Our military and
counterterrorism professionals have relentlessly pursued terrorist
networks overseas — disrupting safe havens in several different
countries, killing Osama bin Laden, and decimating al Qaeda’s
leadership.

Over the last
few years, however, the terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase.
As we’ve become better at preventing complex, multifaceted attacks like
9/11, terrorists turned to less complicated acts of violence like the
mass shootings that are all too common in our society. It is this type
of attack that we saw at Fort Hood in 2009; in Chattanooga earlier this
year; and now in San Bernardino. And as groups like ISIL grew stronger
amidst the chaos of war in Iraq and then Syria, and as the Internet
erases the distance between countries, we see growing efforts by
terrorists to poison the minds of people like the Boston Marathon
bombers and the San Bernardino killers.

They are simply
reminding Muslims of the forgotten obligation: offensive Jihad.

For seven
years, I’ve confronted this evolving threat each morning in my
intelligence briefing.

According to the
reports I get, you skip the PDB. The threat is "convert or
die" but, being born Muslim, the threat is not against you, its against
us.

And since the
day I took this office, I’ve authorized U.S. forces to take out
terrorists abroad precisely because I know how real the danger is.

The danger is in Ummah
al-Islamiyya, Muslims jointly & severally. Killing a few
leaders does not cut the mustard. Islam must become extinct.

As
Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security
of the American people.

And you abandoned that
responsibility, forsworn in your oath of office. You are one
of the enemy, not one of us.

As a father
to two young daughters who are the most precious part of my life, I
know that we see ourselves with friends and coworkers at a holiday
party like the one in San Bernardino. I know we see our kids in the
faces of the young people killed in Paris. And I know that after so
much war, many Americans are asking whether we are confronted by a
cancer that has no immediate cure.

Islam is the cancer,
radiation is the answer. The war continues until Islam is
extinct. Muslims are threatened with Hellfire if they lag
behind and promised eternal orgy if they go to Jihad. Its
what Believers do. Make them quit believing or quit living,
one or the other. There is no other solution.

Well, here’s
what I want you to know: The threat from terrorism is real, but we will
overcome it. We will destroy ISIL and any other organization that tries
to harm us.

Its Islam, Stupid! ISIL,
HAMAS, Hezbollah, etc. are subsets of Islam. They
all read the Qur'an, obey Allah & emulate Moe. While they
believe in Allah, his imperative, threat & promise, there will
be no peace.

You
can not destroy ISIL, even if you could, that would not bring peace
because other Believers would continue the Jihad.

Success will come, if it ever
does, certainly not with any damn Democrat in power, by destroying
their faith: causing them to cease believing in Allah and causing them
to be ashamed of ever having believed.

Appeasement is not one
of our values, neither is submission nor surrender. Old Harry
was true to our values when he nuked Japan: saving American lives by
killing the enemy.

That’s what
groups like ISIL are hoping for.

No, they are hoping we
will lose our will to resist and surrender to them.

Instead, we
will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless, and
by drawing upon every aspect of American power.

We can not pevail with
suicidal rules of engagement that value enemy lives and assets over
ours. We can not prevail by bombing empty buildings. We can
not prevail by lying about the identity of the enemy. We can
not prevail by abandoning hard won ground. We can not prevail by
allowing sanctuary to the enemy. We can not prevail by ignoring Iran's
supplying the enemy at the front with EFPs.

Here’s
how. First, our military will continue to hunt down terrorist plotters
in any country where it is necessary. In Iraq and Syria, airstrikes are
taking out ISIL leaders, heavy weapons, oil tankers, infrastructure.
And since the attacks in Paris, our closest allies — including France,
Germany, and the United Kingdom — have ramped up their contributions to
our military campaign, which will help us accelerate our effort to
destroy ISIL.

There is no effort to
destroy ISIL because ISIL is Islam and Islam is ISIL and you are one of
them, not one of us. If you wanted to destroy ISIL, thousands
of bombing runs would not have ended with full armament. If
you wanted to destroy ISIL, that armored column approaching Mosul would
have been strafed by A10s and destroyed.

Second, we
will continue to provide training and equipment to tens of thousands of
Iraqi and Syrian forces fighting ISIL on the ground so that we take
away their safe havens.

Your training and
equipment provided to Muslims will, sooner or later, be turned on us
and our interests int he region. Shi'ia & Sunni are
rivals for power, both are inimical to us, neither is a
friend or allie. Anyone who reads the Qur'an will know that.

In both
countries, we’re deploying Special Operations Forces who can accelerate
that offensive. We’ve stepped up this effort since the attacks in
Paris, and we’ll continue to invest more in approaches that are working
on the ground.

Third, we’re
working with friends and allies to stop ISIL’s operations — to disrupt
plots, cut off their financing, and prevent them from recruiting more
fighters. Since the attacks in Paris, we’ve surged intelligence-sharing
with our European allies. We’re working with Turkey to seal its border
with Syria. And we are cooperating with Muslim-majority countries — and
with our Muslim communities here at home — to counter the vicious
ideology that ISIL promotes online.

The vicious ideology
is Islam. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped, legislate and rule.
All non-Muslims are waging war against Allah and must be
converted, subjugated or killed. Its Islam,
Stupid!!! We who read the Qur'an & hadith know you to
be an accursaed liar.

Fourth, with
American leadership, the international community has begun to establish
a process — and timeline — to pursue ceasefires and a political
resolution to the Syrian war.

There is no ceasefire
but hudna, for a maximum of ten years in Islam. There is no political
resolution, only conquest or defeat. Any replacement for Assad will be
worse. You and Shrub caused this situation with your damned
fool "democracy project" & "Arab Spring".

Doing so
will allow the Syrian people and every country, including our allies,
but also countries like Russia, to focus on the common goal of
destroying ISIL — a group that threatens us all.

Other Muslims do not
want to destroy ISIL, they want to use it against rivals for power,
keeping it out of their own cities.

This is our
strategy to destroy ISIL. It is designed and supported by our military
commanders and counterterrorism experts, together with 65 countries
that have joined an American-led coalition. And we constantly examine
our strategy to determine when additional steps are needed to get the
job done.

The job will not be
done until Islam is extinct. When that happy day comes, there will be
no more ISIL.

That’s why
I’ve ordered the Departments of State and Homeland Security to review
the visa program under which the female terrorist in San Bernardino
originally came to this country.

Visas do not cut the
mustard. Expel and exclude all Muslims. Let no Muslim cross our border
except on the way out. Its Islam, Stupid!

And that’s
why I will urge high-tech and law enforcement leaders to make it harder
for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.

Now, here at
home, we have to work together to address the challenge. There are
several steps that Congress should take right away.

To begin
with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able
to buy a gun.

You
can not stop Muslims from getting guns, knives, machetes, razors,
hatchets and hammers. You need to get them out of here. Send them all
home!!!

Those who perpetrated
the San Bernardino Massacre were not on the no fly list and two of
their weapons were procured in straw buyer deals.

What
could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy
a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.

What could possibly be
the argument for allowing a terrorist to live among us and kill our
fellows at will?

We also need
to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons like the
ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there are some who reject
any gun safety measures. But the fact is that our intelligence and law
enforcement agencies — no matter how effective they are — cannot
identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that individual is
motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology. What we can do — and
must do — is make it harder for them to kill.

You can only, and seek
to, make it more difficult for us to defend ourselves. You are
exploiting national grief for political gain, shame on you and every AssWhole who voted for you!

Next, we
should put in place stronger screening for those who come to America
without a visa so that we can take a hard look at whether they’ve
traveled to warzones.

Just screen out the
damn Muslims! Keep it simple, Stupid.

And we’re
working with members of both parties in Congress to do exactly that.

Finally, if
Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL, it should go
ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military force against
these terrorists.

Congress should issue
a declaration of war on Islam and order you to prosecute that war
effectively to the last Musalim.

For over a
year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of airstrikes
against ISIL targets. I think it’s time for Congress to vote to
demonstrate that the American people are united, and committed, to this
fight.

Impeaching, convicting
and removing you from office is the first step.

My fellow
Americans, these are the steps that we can take together to defeat the
terrorist threat. Let me now say a word about what we should not do.

We should not
be drawn once more into a long and costly ground war in Iraq or
Syria.

We
should use our technical advantage against them: bomb them wherever you
find them with Daisy Cutters, MOABs and Neutron Bombs. Every
base, every training camp, every occupied city and every military asset
up in smoke without regard or regret for collateral damage.

And quit supplying and
training Muslims, they are the enemy.

That’s what
groups like ISIL want. They know they can’t defeat us on the
battlefield. ISIL fighters were part of the insurgency that we faced in
Iraq. But they also know that if we occupy foreign lands, they can
maintain insurgencies for years, killing thousands of our troops,
draining our resources, and using our presence to draw new recruits.

The strategy
that we are using now — airstrikes, Special Forces, and working with
local forces who are fighting to regain control of their own
country — that is how we’ll achieve a more sustainable victory. And it
won’t require us sending a new generation of Americans overseas to
fight and die for another decade on foreign soil.

Here’s
what else we cannot do. We cannot turn against one another by letting
this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam.

Only
because you are a Goddamn Muslim. Its Islam, Stupid. We who read the
Qur'an, hadith and Islamic law will not be deceived by your lies any
more than we were deceived by Shrub's.

In 1778, before the
reconquest of Israel, before American boots polluted the soil of the
Hijaz, the Barbary Pirates sacked our merchantmen 'cuz it was "written
in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their
authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war
upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they
could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain
in battle was sure to go to Paradise." So
Tripoly's Ambassador to England told Jefferson & Adams. Who
will get a clue?

That,
too, is what groups like ISIL want. ISIL does not speak for Islam. They
are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death, and they account for a
tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the
world — including millions of patriotic Muslim Americans who reject
their hateful ideology.

Anyone
who rejects the damnable doctrines of Islam, is no Muslim, he is either
an infidel, a hypocrite or an apostate. Muslims are thugs and
killers. Islam was founded by a barbarian war lord for his own personal
emolument through plunder and extortion.

Islam is the cult of
death: "We love death more than you love life." 'Cuz being
killed in battle gets them out of the fire and into Allah's celestial
bordello.

Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are
Muslim.

How many of the 270
Million Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Christians, Yazidis, Animists, pagans
& Zoroastriansslaughtered by Muslims
since 623 were Muslims? Shi'ia and Sunni kill each other 'cuz
they are rivals for power since before the battle of Karbala.
We are their primary target.

If we’re to succeed in
defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as
some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through
suspicion and hate.

Exactly
what Goddamn part of this escapes your comprehension:

3:28. Let not the believers take the
disbelievers as Auliyâ
(supporters,
helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be
helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them.
And Allâh warns
you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the
final return.

???

That does not
mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has spread within some
Muslim communities.

Kill them wherever you
find them, strike terror, terrify and fight those who... until... are
not extreme, they are normative in Islam. Moe spread terror
by assassinations, genocide, barbarian rapine and burning crops.
The founder's preaching & example are normal, not
extreme.

This is a
real problem that Muslims must confront, without excuse. Muslim leaders
here and around the globe have to continue working with us to
decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that groups
like ISIL and al Qaeda promote; to speak out against not just acts of
violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are incompatible
with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human
dignity.

Muslims must reject
Islam and apostatize. That which you would have them condemn
is intrinsic to the core of Islam. It is
enshrined in the Qur'an & exemplified in the Sunnah and can not
be abjured short of apostasy.

But just
as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out
misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the responsibility
of all Americans — of every faith — to reject discrimination.

"Radicalization"
is a Goddamn lie! Its Islam, Stupid!! Believers are defined
in 9.111 & 49.15. Click through and get a
clue.

It is the
responsibility of all Harbis wheresoever dispersed over the face of the
earth, to reject, condemn, curse and campaign for the extinction of
Islam. Expelling and excluding Muslims from Dar ul-Harb is
the first step towards regaining security.

It is
our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this
country.

It is your
responsibility to enact a criminal enterprise test on all who enter
America. Members of the Mafia, whether Italian or Arabic must
be excluded. Admit no Muslims because they belong to the war cult,
originally an Arab Mafia.

There are no Muslim
Americans. Islam and Americanism are mutually exclusive.
Muslims in America are an enemy fifth column and must be
expelled.

Because
when we travel down that road, we lose.

We lose when you lie
about the identity of the enemy: its Islam, Traitor!

That
kind of divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands
of groups like ISIL.

Tolerating Islam and
lying about it is the betrayal of our
values: the divine origin of the rights to life, liberty, free
expression, self government and property ownership.

Muslim
Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co-workers, our sports
heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are
willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.

Muslims, all Muslims
are enemies sworn to the destruction of our way of life. This
is true no matter where they are dispersed over the face of the earth.
They are obligated by enslavement to Allah, to fight us until
we submit.

My
fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission
because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a
belief in human dignity — that no matter who you are, or where you come
from, or what you look like, or what religion you practice, you are
equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law.

Those who hold
themselves superior because of their enslavement to Satan; who deny the
sanctity of our blood & property and our human rights are not
equal, they are 'more equal'. To Hell with them. The practice
of Islam is inimical to our lives and liberties. Get a clue!

Even in this
political season, even as we properly debate what steps I and future
Presidents must take to keep our country safe, let’s make sure we never
forget what makes us exceptional.

Our organic documents
are the national treasures that make America exceptional.
Your AssWholliness: the
abomination of desolation standing in the temple of liberty, is
destroying this nation.

Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear;
that we have always met challenges — whether war or depression, natural
disasters or terrorist attacks — by coming together around our common
ideals as one nation, as one people.

American patriots and
Muslims are enemies, not one people. They are here to conquer, not to
assimilate.

So
long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt America will
prevail.

Thank you.
God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.