News

Durham University students on 'Jimmy Savile' themed bar crawl disciplined

STUDENTS at one of the country’s leading universities have been disciplined over a Jimmy Savile–themed bar crawl.

The St Cuthbert’s Society Men’s Rugby Club at Durham University reportedly asked first year students to come as young girls, second years as the serial abuser Savile, and third and fourth years as BBC reporters and policemen.

They are said to have visited the student bars of other university colleges during last month’s social night but their behaviour drew complaints and the club has now been banned from playing matches in the university’s inter-college league for the rest of the term.

About 20 students who took part in the event have been fined £50 following a disciplinary investigation by the college authorities and the social secretary and club captain have been required to do 20 hours of community work.

The club, which has A and B teams, appealed against its punishment but the decision was upheld.

Savile, the knighted radio DJ, TV presenter and charity fund-raiser who died aged 84 in October of last year, has been revealed as a paedophile who used the cover of his celebrity to abuse hundreds of youngsters over six decades.

Police believe he could be the country’s most prolific sex offender after an ITV documentary led to a flood of allegations about the now-disgraced celebrity.

A spokesperson for Durham University said: “The university has been made aware of an incident.

“We take such matters very seriously. The students’ college has investigated the incident and disciplinary action is being taken.”

According to the Durham student newspaper Palatinate, the evening started at St Cuthbert’s Society before moving on to other colleges.

Members of the group reportedly tried to take a dartboard from the bar at St Mary’s College , one person stripped naked in the Collingwood College bar and a fire alarm was set off while the party was at Grey College.

The rugby club could not be contacted for comment by The Northern Echo.

They were only having a laugh, no one was hurt... ,I know it does nt look good for J.S. (in fact it looks bad) but nothing has been proved.
Where will we draw the line, no more Nov 5th(terrorist).
No more xmas.(Pagan festival.)
No more April fools. (childish)
No more trick/treating. (threatening)
mischief night.(vandalism).
They are students on the final steps to adult hood, if they had dressed as nurses, police or even half naked(normal night out these days they would have been slated.

They were only having a laugh, no one was hurt... ,I know it does nt look good for J.S. (in fact it looks bad) but nothing has been proved.
Where will we draw the line, no more Nov 5th(terrorist).
No more xmas.(Pagan festival.)
No more April fools. (childish)
No more trick/treating. (threatening)
mischief night.(vandalism).
They are students on the final steps to adult hood, if they had dressed as nurses, police or even half naked(normal night out these days they would have been slated.glyn

It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.

It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.Voice-of-reality

Every one has been a victim of something or other whether it is bullying at school, teasing, big nose, little nose, glasses, second hand shoes some form of sexual abuse, mother in law jokes, white jokes, irish jokes, Scottish or black jokes,the list is endless.
Personally there are lots of jokes that I find that could refer to me but life goes on and I am able to laugh at the jokes and myself.
This does not mean that I am heartless or I do not have sympathy for people because they have been a victim. But I do have a sense of humour which unfortunately is not PC these days.
Think of a joke any joke and here will be a "victim"

Every one has been a victim of something or other whether it is bullying at school, teasing, big nose, little nose, glasses, second hand shoes some form of sexual abuse, mother in law jokes, white jokes, irish jokes, Scottish or black jokes,the list is endless.
Personally there are lots of jokes that I find that could refer to me but life goes on and I am able to laugh at the jokes and myself.
This does not mean that I am heartless or I do not have sympathy for people because they have been a victim. But I do have a sense of humour which unfortunately is not PC these days.
Think of a joke any joke and here will be a "victim"glyn

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police...

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police...glyn

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police...

it was in very bad taste,imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past,seeing these people on the streets of Durham.
Bit unfair, classing all students as sex offenders, even if they were in fancy dress dressed as students, an ex tv/ radio personality (Against whom allegations have been made) and police...glyn

Voice-of-reality wrote:
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.

You obviously have some grudge with Bailey having made this comment before.

However, if people are taking out loans to finance more years of education it is they that potentially lose out, the University that gains and no problem for the taxpayer so I fail to see what your real gripe is!

Only recently Universities were complaining about shortfall in numbers so they will hardly mind.

[quote][p][bold]Voice-of-reality[/bold] wrote:
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.[/p][/quote]You obviously have some grudge with Bailey having made this comment before.
However, if people are taking out loans to finance more years of education it is they that potentially lose out, the University that gains and no problem for the taxpayer so I fail to see what your real gripe is!
Only recently Universities were complaining about shortfall in numbers so they will hardly mind.ajtib3

Glyn,you are totally missing the point,i never said the students were sex offenders ,that's a really stupid comment and equating peadophilia with bullying at school is nonsensicle i think you need to think more before commenting.

Glyn,you are totally missing the point,i never said the students were sex offenders ,that's a really stupid comment and equating peadophilia with bullying at school is nonsensicle i think you need to think more before commenting.loonyleft

For god's sake, was anybody hurt? No, nobody. If the college wants to punish them it's one thing but the hand wringing on here from some of you is pathetic. They were only costumes!

For god's sake, was anybody hurt? No, nobody. If the college wants to punish them it's one thing but the hand wringing on here from some of you is pathetic. They were only costumes!Employed Tax Payer, Central Darlo

Perhaps its time that such 'students' actually got down to getting some work done...but then from what I've witnessed of the Durham Uni students they don't really have to because 'daddy' will get them one!

Perhaps its time that such 'students' actually got down to getting some work done...but then from what I've witnessed of the Durham Uni students they don't really have to because 'daddy' will get them one!Longbowman666

There are some old bitter people about who have forgotten how to have a good time.
Did you never do anything risqué/cheeky. Bet you did.
The stududents did no harm.
Lets have a comment from some of the students.

There are some old bitter people about who have forgotten how to have a good time.
Did you never do anything risqué/cheeky. Bet you did.
The stududents did no harm.
Lets have a comment from some of the students.glyn

This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals.

also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ?

but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile))

not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty

his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp

This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals.
also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ?
but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile))
not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty
his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUpsoulsearcher

Voice-of-reality wrote:
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.

Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway.

So why not take that chip off your shoulder!

[quote][p][bold]Voice-of-reality[/bold] wrote:
It is the same sort of mentality that allows undergraduates at another Bailey College to never have to pass an exam and still be taking taxpayers money after four years... the normal length of the degree in question being three - with said same students having no realistic prospect of ever graduating. (Freedom of Information requests needed). Further, the regulations of the university are very clear - if action brings the university into disrepute or has the potential so to do, the student should be expelled. This would again save the taxpayer money but of course, universities such as Durham seem ever more remote from the concerns of the real world.[/p][/quote]Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway.
So why not take that chip off your shoulder!Joshua J

Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway.

So why not take that chip off your shoulder!

Firstly before i begin I don't disagree with their behaviour at all. However, I would like to understand why the behaviour of some students which you clearly disagree with, gives you the right to paint the rest if the Bailey, or indeed Durham University with the same brush. The Bailey for one does not dictate the length of a degree, this is a decision of the University; I would further like to point out that, many students are working two jobs and taking on student loans to put themselves through Univeristy. As for bringing the University into disrepute, judging by the publics opinion on this feed, the majority understand the nature of which the dressing up was intended and that no one was indeed meant to be offended in anyway.
So why not take that chip off your shoulder!Joshua J

The authorities at Durham University seem to have had a sense of humour bypass. Personally, I find it hilarious and before anyone starts that "what if Jimmy molested you ........." nonsense, you cant ban everything that doesnt quite tickle your fancy. Lots of comedy is cruel and lacks taste, thats what makes us laugh.

The authorities at Durham University seem to have had a sense of humour bypass. Personally, I find it hilarious and before anyone starts that "what if Jimmy molested you ........." nonsense, you cant ban everything that doesnt quite tickle your fancy. Lots of comedy is cruel and lacks taste, thats what makes us laugh.Scotchcorner

Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham".
I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.

Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham".
I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.Adam Walker

I dont recall anything being proved yet !. Looks like your just another one of them that believe anything you read. You must try and get out more !!.

[quote][p][bold]loonyleft[/bold] wrote:
always wrong,only a laugh,wasn't that Jimmy Saviles excuse?[/p][/quote]I dont recall anything being proved yet !. Looks like your just another one of them that believe anything you read. You must try and get out more !!.always right

hello Adam crawled from under your stone again,is the dark man frightening you again? how many immigrants are infesting Tudhoe these days, move to the midlands and make your self popular they will just love you.

hello Adam crawled from under your stone again,is the dark man frightening you again? how many immigrants are infesting Tudhoe these days, move to the midlands and make your self popular they will just love you.loonyleft

Wonder why the comments on more multicultural enrichment have been removed? http://www.thenorthe
rnecho.co.uk/news/10
069308.Carwash_kingp
in_jailed_over_plan_
to_flood_North_East_
with_heroin/
How can we celebrate the failed experiment and feel truly enriched if we are not allowed a voice on such matters?

Wonder why the comments on more multicultural enrichment have been removed? http://www.thenorthe
rnecho.co.uk/news/10
069308.Carwash_kingp
in_jailed_over_plan_
to_flood_North_East_
with_heroin/
How can we celebrate the failed experiment and feel truly enriched if we are not allowed a voice on such matters?Adam Walker

Oh sorry, educating pork is an impossibility. Still worth a read for anyone interested in what is really going on, however.

A little bit of reading to educate the pork out there hiding amongst us.....
http://www.bnp.org.u
k/news/national/libe
ralmarxist-fascism-a
nd-totalitarianism-%
E2%80%93-explanation
Oh sorry, educating pork is an impossibility. Still worth a read for anyone interested in what is really going on, however.Adam Walker

Adam Walker wrote:
Loonyleft.... you commented &quot;it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham".
I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.

That'll be those Muslmic Ray Guns then.

http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=AIPD8qHht
VU

[quote][p][bold]Adam Walker[/bold] wrote:
Loonyleft.... you commented "it was in very bad taste, imagine if you had been the victim of a sex offender in the past, seeing these people on the streets of Durham".
I should imagine that our children, who are groomed, drugged and gang raped by Muslim paedophiles have similar feelings every time they see a Muslim man. Fortunately for those you mention Savile is dead, unlike the growing problem of Muslim paedophile gangs, which grows bigger with each passing day as the problem is brushed under the carpet up and down the country.[/p][/quote]That'll be those Muslmic Ray Guns then.
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=AIPD8qHht
VUJuiceTerry

soulsearcher wrote:
This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals.

also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ?

but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile))

not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty

his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp

You can't defame the dead. Next well thought out suggestion?

[quote][p][bold]soulsearcher[/bold] wrote:
This story did not really shock me.some students are very immature.I would send them back home We don't want most of them here.That why they get hassle off locals.
also back to the js case I thought in the uk you are innocent until proven guilty ?
but this paper says Js is ((revealed as a paedophile))
not sticking up for him but js cant defend himself and in law anyone is innocent until proven guilty
his family could earn big bucks. and sue press students GrowUp[/p][/quote]You can't defame the dead. Next well thought out suggestion?JuiceTerry

I love reading the comments people leave on this website. They're usually far more interesting that the story itself, and really brighten up my desk-bound lunchtime.
Keep up the good work Northern Echo readers!
Thank you

I love reading the comments people leave on this website. They're usually far more interesting that the story itself, and really brighten up my desk-bound lunchtime.
Keep up the good work Northern Echo readers!
Thank youAMB2nd

always right wrote:
Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day.

well said....people dress up as hitler, gary glitter. pol pot, saddam hussein, osama bin laden, and wow even winston churchill ....whats the problem people should accept it for what it would have been....a **** take.....
yes he was a dirty perverted t.w.a.t......but life moves on......students are students...also have all commenting on here never done something like that before....i guess you have......its a joke.......

[quote][p][bold]always right[/bold] wrote:
Its only a bit laugh. Honestly,you Brits are getting as Daft as the yanks by the day.[/p][/quote]well said....people dress up as hitler, gary glitter. pol pot, saddam hussein, osama bin laden, and wow even winston churchill ....whats the problem people should accept it for what it would have been....a **** take.....
yes he was a dirty perverted t.w.a.t......but life moves on......students are students...also have all commenting on here never done something like that before....i guess you have......its a joke.......the-big-yin

A few lads having fun. Get a life you leftie socialist do gooders.Sack the lot of you and all you social workers and good for nothing councillors with your snouts in the trough .Bring on the uprising of the people.

A few lads having fun. Get a life you leftie socialist do gooders.Sack the lot of you and all you social workers and good for nothing councillors with your snouts in the trough .Bring on the uprising of the people.snudge

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer

Height of Sanity wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.

Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.

[quote][p][bold]Height of Sanity[/bold] wrote:
Quite funny and orignal for Durham students, who on earth would be offended by this the joke is at the expense of a deceased child molester.[/p][/quote]Surely you should use the word "alleged", police evidence is one thing (remember the lies about Hillsborough) but Jimmy Saville, until proven guilty in a court of law, is to all intents and purposes, innocent. People like you would burn so called witches, 300 years ago, it's so easy to jump on the bandwaggon of mass hysteria. Saville, unlike McAlpine, is no longer with us. People like you soon changed their minds about him did they not ??. Wally.doonhamer