Hi Tim,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@sun.com> wrote:
> I thought Rick was being fair. XSD is a failure by any sane technical
> measure.
I agree, that XSD spec has been quite mammoth and functionally
complex. That's the only aspect, I see XSD being different from most
of other W3C specs.
From functional point of view, I don't think XSD doesn't work. So many
numerous XML applications currently used XSD.
I don't think, there is anything wrong with the basic core/philosophy
of XSD. I guess, some of users who don't like XSD generally, it's
probably because of it's huge size, and steep learning curve.
I believe, XSD also get's functionally better with the upcoming 1.1 release.
> There's no reason not to acknowledge this and hopefully learn from
> it in future standardization efforts.
Pls see my previous remarks :)
> If we don't learn from our failures
> we're condemned to repeat them.
I agree. That's true for any endeavors we get engaged in :)
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi