Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> Without /apparent/ such, anyhow, since the WHATWG, oddly
>> enough for a group that consist of browser vendors, appear
>> not to read "wild" HTML ...
>
> See large-scale study of HTML in the wild cited above (although I'd love
> to see a version that is even more quantitative and links to some
> samples, or better yet a fully reproducible experiment.)
So would I. Maybe it should be a priority for the new WG to put together
an open methodology and do just that.
http://triin.net/2006/06/12/Coding_practices_of_web_pages
seems to be a start.
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis