Headlines

Politico

Bad news: Obama just wasn’t into this campaign

The key to understanding the Obama enigma of 2012, according to more than a dozen Obama associates interviewed by POLITICO during the campaign, is that the president enthusiastically approved the message of relentless attacks against Mitt Romney. But until the last week of the campaign — when optimism made a major comeback — Obama executed it mirthlessly and mechanically, at times reinforcing the “meh” vibe of his supportive but uninspired base…

“I get why he had to do what he did. It was smart politically. But he’s become the embodiment of the partisanship he once decried,” said The New York Times’s David Brooks, one of the few journalists to strike up a real relationship with Obama during his first term. “The dissonance [between Obama in 2008 and 2012] is so obvious. … Can you think of a president who ran more different campaigns the first and second times? I’ve tried. I can’t.”…

“[Obama] found his voice in 2008. That voice has, for the most part, been missing in 2012,” said CNN contributor David Gergen, who counseled presidents Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

“This isn’t the kind of politics this man likes to practice. … Another factor is that he’s a moody person. Bill Clinton, for instance, was a much sunnier person. He let things roll off him more easily. You could see that during [Clinton’s] reelection campaign. … The clothes of this campaign, the negativity, don’t really fit” Obama.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

First, Brooks and Gergen are being characterized as “Obama associates”? Fifth-column status confirmed in print.

Second, we’re told that Obama was too good for the kind of campaign he had to run? He was above this partisan sniping? Gimme a break. He was weaned on this stuff in Chicago and, in particular, that racist church he attended for nearly 20 years.

“The dissonance [between Obama in 2008 and 2012] is so obvious. . . . “[Obama] found his voice in 2008. That voice has, for the most part, been missing in 2012,”

What utter B.S.

The nasty, hyper-partisan, thin-skinned Obama the nation saw during the 2012 campaign is the same nasty, hyper-partisan jerk Obama has always been. The “I won” and “get in their faces” and “punish your enemies” creep who has disgraced the office of the president for the past four years.

The real dissonance in Obama’s story was the contrast voters saw between the real Obama (the dirty Chicago politician who beat his opponents by getting their sealed divorce records released), and the bi-partisan, post-racial, phony persona he affected for the 2008 campaign.