The consequences of the feminization of education in the UK

Dina sent me this article from the UK Daily Mail. The article starts with an excellent explanation of what male teachers bring to the classroom when they are not regulated by politically correct feminists, using one Eric Sutton as an example.

Then there is this:

Which brings me to the reason I’m taking a trip down Memory Lane today — the news that there has been a significant increase in the number of men training as primary school teachers.

For the past 40-odd years, the feminisation of state education has been a disaster. There are more than 4,250 schools in Britain where not a single male teacher can be found in the staff room. The Eric Suttons of this world are as extinct as the stegosaurus.

Coupled with the trendy, ‘child-centred’ teaching methods indoctrinated by Marxist training colleges, this has been responsible for a collapse in discipline and an alarming increase in illiteracy.

Generations of boys have been utterly betrayed by the system set up to educate them — many written off as suffering from a bewildering array of fashionable ‘hyperactivity disorders’ and pumped full of mind-bending drugs simply because young female teachers have no idea how to control or inspire them.

With no competitive sport to channel their physical excesses — a consequence of the pernicious ‘all-must-have-prizes’ culture identified by Melanie Phillips — and zero intellectual stimulation, young men are leaving school unsuited to the adult world.

The rise in single motherhood and absentee fathers, coupled with a monopoly of female primary school teachers, means that countless thousands of boys reach puberty without having encountered a male role model, apart from the local ‘gangstas’.

Our sick society, which considers any man who wants to work with children to be a potential paedophile, has helped to turn primary schools into testosterone-free zones.

A male teacher who volunteered to take young boys and girls swimming would be lucky to escape without a knock on the door from the nonce squad or a petrol bomb being lobbed through his front window.

Those hardy male souls who have taken the plunge report hostility and ‘intimidation’ from all-female staff rooms — which tends to suggest they are probably not cut out for dealing with a class full of seven-year-old savages, either.

All this combined with relatively low wages has conspired against encouraging any young family man to become a primary school teacher.

The good news is that recent changes which allow teachers to earn a salary while they train in school have begun to attract more men into the profession. And the Government has launched a campaign to persuade male graduates to take up a career in primary education.

The numbers applying have risen by 51 per cent, albeit from a low base.

Eric Sutton would have approved.

Boys simply do not learn well from female teachers, and they especially don’t learn well when they are distracted by girls. Boys are in rapid retreat as a result of these policies. Not only that, but feminism’s emphasis on sex education and recreational premarital sex does nothing to encourage men to take on the traditional male roles and commit to a woman in order to get sex in the context of marriage. Much of the idiotic “man up” rhetoric on the right and left fails to recognize these three factors which discourage men from stepping into their roles as leaders, providers and protectors.

I think that more male teachers is a good sign for the success of boys in the UK, because boys who lack male leadership from fathers and teachers do not easily accept the roles that society needs them to play – including protecting, providing and leading on moral and spiritual issues. It’s nice to see that the UK is taking steps to come out of the long dark night of feminism, even as America dips further and further into it, with the decline of males aided by government intervention. Maybe the collapse of the traditional family needs to happen realize the harm that feminism has done to children, and especially to young men.

8 Responses

This is a great analysis. I would also add feminism is a pagan/atheistic culture which strives to destroy the teaching of any Judeo-Christian values in British schools. The sun has set on the Britain Empire.

I agree that this is a good analysis, but I would suggest that there will be significant economic repercussions for countries as well. I draw your attention to the reality that when a country fails to educate half of its population to the maximum of their potential (in many countries this means girls; increasingly in countries such as the UK, the US and Canada, this means boys), it loses the economic abilities that part of the population could bring. I recommend interested parties check this by Googling “Feminization of Education” and see the article in The Catholic Register of Dec.30 for more on this topic.

It is based on the book Rescuing Our Underachieving Sons which is 396 pages long, uses over 400 sources and has over 500 footnotes. The book itself takes no prisoners.The reporter, meanwhile was writing for a specific audience. If your reading audience is not interested, so be it.

I spent nearly four years, full-time, researching and writing this book – in Canada, the UK and the USA. It has been reviewed and I have been interviewed by nine newspapers and one television station in Canada and the US. The book is in many public libraries and universities in all three countries. I have not had much success in getting any attention for the topic in the media in the UK, even though much of the research was done here. My website is http://www.DrJamesSBrown.com if anyone is interested in reading about my background or a synopsis of the book. Further information can be obtained by Googling “Feminization of Education Discouraging Boys” or Rescuing Our Underachieving Sons. Incidently, I am not selling a book; rather, I am promoting an idea that should be of interest to everybody, since it eventually will affect everybody, either directly or indirectly.