Posts Tagged ‘migration’

Facts-Many “Syrian refugees” are ISIS sympathizers (or at least %31 of them to be exact!)

Most people will not see these facts represented on the mainstream media, even though many are readily available for inquiring minds. In fact, the traitorous, corrupted mainstream media have been trying hard to hide the facts and obfuscate the truth.

1. They are logistically controlled and assigned by an Islamic supremacist group

Refugee Resettlement Program and U.S. national suicide in progress (just like Europe).

Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the most dangerous Islamic group.

“Syrian refugees” are as dangerous as Trojan Horse- Donald Trump.

Indeed, Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the Muslim tool for global Islamization, is the most dangerous Islamofascist, Islamosupremacist group operating on global scale, comprising 57 Muslim countries with their unified political agenda against the non-Muslim world, generally, and individual non-Muslim countries, specifically.

Implementations:
1. Through various political and financial measures, forcing the non-Muslim countries to implement laws censoring and prohibiting its citizens to criticize the toxic Islamic death rape cult.
2. Through various political and financial measures, forcing the non-Muslim countries to admit Muslim invaders under the moniker “refugees”, as the current “Syrian refugees”.

Saudi Arabia recently added another tool to its tool box of global Islamization and Wahhabi globalization, the presiding seat on the United Nation Human Rights Council (UNHRC), through a shady deal with U.K.’s David Cameron, despite the fact that Saudi Arabia has been one of the worst, if not the worst, human right violator on the planet.

2. They were essentially created, and are generously funded, by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and George Soros

Refugees arriving in Greece on people smugglers’ boats are given a ‘migrants handbook‘ packed with tips, maps, phone numbers and advice about getting across Europe.

3. They are not being admitted to any of the wealthy Islamic countries

These wealthy Islamic countries, despite being leading members of the OIC and surreptitiously flooding the non-Muslim countries with Muslims behind the guise of the UNHCR, do not admit any of their own. Indeed, despite the brouhaha and lies by the traitorous government officials in the West and their corrupted mainstream media lap dogs about the immigration issue, and prodding the citizens of the Western countries, including the American public, to open their hearts to these so-called “Syrian refugees”, these vermins conveniently ignore the elephant in the room. Saudi Arabia (which has 100,000 vacant, fully equipped tents that can reportedly house nearly 2 millions people), Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emigrates, Bahrain) refuse to admit even a single one of these so-called “Syrian refugees”, while Saudi Arabia (led by King Salman) offered to build 200 mosques in Germany if it agrees to host these “refugees”. Based on this fact, and this fact alone, one would imagine the agenda-filled scam should be apparent to anyone with half a brain.

4. Few of them are from Syria

In fact, only about %20 are from Syria. The rest are from Iraq, Afghanistan, and many Islamic countries that are not experiencing any wars or conflicts whatsoever, such as Bosnia, Eritrea, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Morocco, Libya, and Egypt.

5. Those of them truly from Syria do not want to leave

After the “factfinding” trip to 2 Syrian refugee camps in Jordan and meeting with Syrians there, Dr. Ben Carson came away even more convinced that America shouldn’t accept any of them. He indicated,

“I did not detect any great desire for them to come to the United States. You’ve got these refugee camps that aren’t completely full. And all you need is the resources to be able to run them. Why do you need to create something else?” Carson also said that his visit gave him no new confidence that potential terrorists could be screened out of the refugee population, a process he recently likened to handling “mad dogs.”

Overall, the retired neurosurgeon came away with the sense that refugee life in Jordan wasn’t so bad. “It’s really quite impressive when you go over there and see it,“ Carson added, noting the some parts of the camps even had schools, electricity, and indoor plumbing. He also insisted that the refugees were “a lot happier. They were quite willing to stay there as long as it takes before they can get back home.”

6. Few among them are true refugees

Depending on the incoming waves, %75-%80 of them are men, dressing in designer clothes and sporting latest models of iPhone and iPad. Many of them have padded bank accounts. This is completely atypical of any refugee groups in the past. Please see for yourself …

(Click to enlarge)

Syrian refugees are atypical and mostly (%80) fake.

There is a concerted effort by the OIC, traitorous government officials in the West, their minions, and the corrupted mainstream media, to obfuscate the truth these so-called “Syrian refugees”, including hiding the fact about the gender and age composition of the group.

Economic parasites exposed, blaming “bad” food for their their running away. Apparently, “bad” food is worse than whatever they ran away from as “refugees”. Can one become a “refugee” from bad drink? bad clothing? bad allergies?

“Dear Mayor of Mosul (Iraq), due to bad allergies, I cannot possibly continue drinking camel urine for another day, regardless how sparky fresh and palatable the liquid might look to us Muslim jihadists. Therefore, after much consideration, I come to the logical conclusion and heart-wrenching decision that my family and I must immediately run away from your city to escape this crisis, in order to seek asylum in a safer country in Western Europe, where I can escape persecution and torture from this allergic causing urine, extracted from the vengeful camel that surely misses our love and bestiality. As a welcomed refugee invited by Angela Merkel, I can demand an accommodating regiment of gluten-free diets and urine-free beverages which might or might not help my situation. In the latter case that my family and I do not receive generous benefits from the kafirs, I will be returning home and I believe that in such case, my allergies will miraculously be cured, Allah willing. Allahu Akbar!”

7. Less than %3 of them are Christians

A total of 2,290 Syrian refugees have arrived in the United States since fiscal year 2011, which is when the Syrian civil war began, through Nov 20, 2015, according to the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center. Of those, only 62 were hand-picked by the OIC and identified in the center’s database as Christian. That’s %2.7, even though the Christian population in Syria is about %10, according to the CIA World Factbook.

Why so few Christians, inquiring minds might wonder? Please go back and check point #1 above for the answer. That is because the Islamofascists and Islamosupremacists of the world, led by Saudi Arabia, want to methodically Islamize, and not to Christianize, America, as part of their global domination and Islamization scheme.

8. Most of them are Sunni Muslims

The vast majority are Sunni Muslims, who make up 2,128, or 93 percent, of the Syrian refugees in the U.S. even though they compose %74 of the Syrian population. Again, they are hand-picked by the OIC to fit its political agenda and Islamization plan, as Wahhabi (Salafi), the strictest and most violent Muslims, are Sunnis and not Shiites.

9. A good percentage of them are infiltrated ISIS fighters, Al-Qaeda operatives, other terrorists, and terrorist sympathizers.

At least %37 of “Syrian refugees” oppose airstrike on ISIS. In short, it means at least %37 of them are against killing ISIS by airstrike.

(Click to enlarge)

At least %36 Syrian refugees oppose Arabs fighting against ISIS.

In short, it means at least %36 of them do not want their own kind to fight ISIS, so as to easily assign blames and maintain the narratives about the West and Israel as Zionists, as usual, if non-Muslims do the fighting for them.

Any of the above collected answer would be quite concerning by itself. However, the most alarming one is probably that at least %13 of them support ISIS, as shown below. This means at least 1,300 out of 10,000 that Hussein Obama is going to import into U.S. are potential terrorists who would likely commit terror act sooner, or later as sleeper cells, either on U.S. soil or abroad, or both!

(Click to enlarge)

At least %13 Syrian refugees support ISIS.

If %11 of Arabs’ support for ISIS is statistically significant (below, as concluded by the studies), %13 of the so-called Syrian refugees’ support for ISIS is even more so.

“The results of the survey indicate that the vast majority of the Arab public has anegative view of ISIL, while 11% of Arabs have a positive view (either “Positive” or“Positive to some extent”). This latter figure is nonetheless statistically significant;”

Palestine has the most Muslims supporting ISIS, at %24, far more than any other groups surveyed. However, this pales in comparison to the figure from Al-Jazeera Arabic poll which shows a whopping %81 of Muslims supporting ISIS, out of nearly 60,000 responders. The poll, which asked in Arabic, “Do you support the organizing victories of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)?”

How does one reconcile the huge difference? It could be that al-Jazeera‘s audience is predominantly Sunni Muslims who historically identify with ISIS much more than Shiite Muslims. It could also be that the surveyed Muslims gave more honest answers to al-Jazeera (run by Muslim Brotherhood behind the scene) than to Arab Center for research and policy studies (ACRPS). After all, taqiyya/kitman (lying, deception) is rampant in the Muslim world.

(Click to enlarge)

At least %15 Syrian refugees say ISIS is not a threat.

If so, the natural ensuing question would be why these immigrants are escaping Syria and classified as “refugees” in the first place?

At least %41 of them see either the U.S. or Israel as the greatest threat to security and stability of the Arab region, and only %10 of them see Islamic militancy, such as ISIS or Al-Qaeda, as such threat. Again, this begs the question why they are are leaving at all if that is indeed the case.

(Click to enlarge)

At least %41 Syrian refugees blame either U.S. or Israel, and only %10 blame Islamic militancy.

(Click to enlarge)

At least %16 Syrian refugees say ISIS’ strength and support is due to Islam, the highest of all groups. In short, it means they likely think highly of Islam, hence as the source of ISIS’ legitimacy and appeal, more than any groups does.

10. More than 10,000 of them will be imported to U.S. by Hussein Obama

Despite the recent lies and blatant fabrications promulgated by Hussein Obama, his corrupted minions, and the equally corrupted mainstream media along with numerous leftist and Islamofascist funded websites, including those with names like “factcheck.org”, “reason.com”, and “politifact.com”, their colluded goal is to deceive the American public, so as to be able to import many, many more than 10,000 (again, to ultimately Islamize America toward forming Caliphate Americana).

Direcly from the horse’s mouth, here is the Muslim-In-Chief‘s own words not too long ago …

We’re also increasing the number of Syrian and other refugees we admit to the U.S. to 100,000 per year for the next two years.

At 10,000 of these so-called “Syrian refugees”, there would be 1,300 potential terrorists and 3,100 terrorist sympathizers.

At 100,000 of these so-called “Syrian refugees”, there would be 13,000 potential terrorists and 31,000 terrorist sympathizers.

No matter how one slices it, 1 more terrorist is too many, much less hundreds of them, much less thousands of them!

Please note that it only took 16 hijackers to kill nearly 2,977 civilians, brought down the World Trade Center (WTC), and caused the deepest recession in U.S. history; 8 to kill 130 and injure 367 civilians in the Paris attack (Nov 13, 2015), France, and lock down the city of Brussels, Belgium; and 2 to kill 4 and injure 264 in the Boston Marathon Bombings.

Obama: “ISIS is contained”, Nov 12, 2015.

11. At least 25,000 of them will be imported to Canada, just for 2015 alone, by Justin Trudeau

1) Muslim immigration (Hijrah)

The Hijrah aka Hegira or Hejira, is the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib (later renamed by him to Medina), in the year 622 CE. In June 622 CE, after being warned of a plot to assassinate him, Muhammad secretly left his home in Mecca to emigrate to Yathrib, 200 miles north of Mecca, along with his companionAbu Bakr. Yathrib was soon renamed Madīnat an-Nabī, literally “the City of the Prophet”, but an-Nabī was soon dropped, so its name is “Medina”, meaning “the city”.

The first Hijrah is dated to 615 or 613 when a group of Muhammad’s followers fled Mecca’s leading tribe, the Quraysh, who sent emissaries to Ethiopia to bring them back to Arabia. When Muhammad and his followers received an invitation from the people of Yathrib, they decided to leave Mecca. Mohammad arrived Yathrib (Medina) with Abu Bakr, his close friend and father of his preteen wife Aisha, along with other Muslim followers (“Companions”).

Hijrah is Muslim strategy of supplanting the native population of the host country. Indeed, Hijrah is an instrument of Islamic expansionism that employs religious and ethnic separatism in the host countries, especially the West where Muslims could leverage democratic principles and religious freedom against the host countries, in order to gain special status and privilege, then subvert, subdue, and subjugate non-Muslim societies and pave the way for their total Islamization and implementation of Shariah law. Hijrah is a far cry from Western idea of immigration about how the newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and offer their talents and loyalty to the benefit of their new homeland.

The main principle for a Muslim community in a non-Muslim country is that it must be separate and distinct. Already in the Charter of Medina, Muhammad outlined the basic rule for Muslims who emigrate to non-Muslim land, i.e., they must form a separate body, keeping their own laws and making the host country comply with them, as Muslims nowadays constantly made it clear that they were going to live by their own laws.

Muhammad’s teachings forbid Muslims to immigrate to a non-Muslim country if they pursue the goal of their own personal gain or pleasure. But if they immigrate with the ultimate goal of spreading Islam and making it victorious, or at least this is a part of the reason for their Hijrah, then they are allowed both pleasure and personal gain. A Muslim immigrant should not integrate with the host society, but if his stay depends on showing some kind of integration to the host non-Muslim society, then he is permitted to demonstrate a fake integration, only in appearance and only temporarily, until the goal of subduing and the Islamization of this host society is achieved.

That is why all those discussions so popular among Western liberals about which method is best for the integration of the religious Muslim immigrants into the host non-Muslim societies are not only futile; they are amusing, like disputes about the best way to make a tiger a vegetarian.

According to Mohammed, Hijrah is a religious duty for Muslims. It is evident that the more Muslims come to a non-Muslim country, the more possibilities this will open for infiltration in all structures of this country with the final goal of securing victory for Islam, and more soldiers will stand up when the time of Jihad comes. Hijrah is a preparatory stage to Jihad, and Muhammad made it very clear when he said:

“I charge you with five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage Jihad for the sake of Allah.”

The religious duty of Hijrah was stated in numerous Koranic Surahs: 2:218, 8:72,74,75; 9:30,; 16:41; 16:110…They all start with the same words: “Those who believed andemigrated, and strove hard and fought in Allah’s Cause…” Hijrah goes as a step stone for Jihad; where you cannot establish Islam by force is where Hijrah enters. And in practice, it looks like that: Islam in Egypt, Palestine, Iran (Persia), and India was spread by the sword, but Islamization in Indonesia, Malaysia, Central Asia took place through “immigration.”

Immigration in Islam is merely a disguised conquest.

And if someone thinks that this disguised conquest ended, then they are fatally wrong: Islamic immigrationends only when Islam achieves its goal of conquering the world, and Muhammad, again, stated this very clearly:

“Migration cannot be ended as long as there is kufir (unbeliever) or as long as there is an enemy that resists”

Later Muhammad developed this idea, saying:

“Migration will continue until the sun rises from the West. Hijrah would not be stopped until repentance is cut off, and repentance will not be cut off until the sun rises from the West”

So Hijrah can end only when a community or a country has been won over, and the conquest has been achieved. But Jihad does not end until all the world is Islamic, and Muslims should not stop until Islam dominates the world.

As Muhammad formulated it, “There can be no Hijrah after the conquest but Jihad and a desire or an intention, and if you settle then spread out.”

From the start, Muhammad brushed aside the Christian postulate about separation of Church and State: in the Islamic community, Church is State, and State is Church. The most important result of Hijrah was the expansion of Islam outside its initial borders not only as a religion, but as a socio-religious and socio-political system. Hijrah is a transitional period of preparation for transforming the non-Muslim host society into an Islamic society under Shariah Law– a political system, a State, based on Islamic principles- where the inhabitants are “slaves of Allah”.

In the mid-sixties, the West accepted the suicidal doctrine of multiculturalism as its official approach to the problem of immigration. This resulted in an endless stream of immigrants from third world countries pouring into Europe, the USA, Canada and Australia, subsequently displacing the native populations and creating both social tensions and an unsustainable financial burden.

Uncontrolled immigration has contributed to a dissipating economy, disturbing crime statistics, a high rate of unemployment among natives, swollen welfare rolls so out of control they are practically bankrupting Western countries, and has even led to an unprecedented wave of terrorism. But the biggest problem of this massive Muslim immigration is the supplanting, or replacement, of the native populations of Western countries with people who do not share those values that were and are the cornerstone of Western Civilization. In fact, these Muslims often come to the West with the intent to destroy it. The sharp growth of the number of immigrants often openly hostile to the West, combined with the distortion of traditional Western values by liberals and leftists pose a serious threat to the very existence of Western civilization.

If USA still embodies the values that America has traditionally stood for since the birth of the country, Obama should rescue and let the persecuted immigrants, like the overwhelmingly Christians in the current world crisis, into US, and not the Muslims, yet he has been doing just the opposite. Mr. Hussein Obama is recklessly adding about 100,000 Muslims, now more than immigrants from Mexico and Central America combined, per year to US, without valid justifications nor detailed screenings. At current rates, the Muslim population in the US will double over the next 15 years, hitting about 6.2 million in 2030 when it will have a larger number of Muslims than any European country except for France and Russia, unfortunately.

US should stop Muslim immigration ASAP! In 2016, Americans should vote for a president who could save America and its future from becoming another Caliphate like Europe, and who is not afraid to call ISIS Islamic nor apologetically willing to revise American history to include Islam in positive light to appease the Muslims, against the national and democratic values set forth by the American Founding Fathers.

France has 6.5 million Muslims, or 10% of its population. More than 1,000 French Muslims have joined ISIS. A recent poll found that 27% of French Muslims ages 18-24 support the Islamic State.

There are “no-go” zones all over the country. Muslim attacks on police and synagogues are now regular events.

Same situation now exists in Germany. 40% of Germans say they don’t feel at home in their own country (yet they admitted 800,000 of these violent and ungrateful low lives in 2015).

US will no doubt suffer the same nightmares if its Muslim population is allowed to reach a critical mass.

2) Muslim Politics

Why none from other religions (Christians, Mormons, Jewish, Buddhists, Hindi, etc.) has asked for special treatments like the Muslims do? Why is there no Christian Capitol Day, nor Mormon Capitol Day, nor Jewish Capitol Day, nor Buddhists Capitol Day, nor Hindi Capitol Day, but there are Muslim Capitol Days, twice a year, starting in Texas. Michigan, Missouri, Iowa, Florida, etc. and now spreading to Oklahoma and the rest of US? That is because the goal of Islam is POLITICAL and NOT religious, as Islam has been more of a destructive, toxic cult (with beheading, honor-killing, stoning, raping, enslaving women, torturing, burning, throwing down from tall buildings, lying/taqiyya/kitman, etc.) than a religion, much different from any of the true world religions.

In US, they have been trying to make political connections, both at state and federal levels, under the umbrella of CAIR, a terrorist front group for Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood, and a number of other radical US based Muslim entities via many dubious means.