Woman sued for paternity fraud, claims remorse

A woman accused of deceiving her former lover into believing he was the father of her son broke down in tears as she told a court that she felt ‘deeply sorry’ about the distress caused when he discovered the child was not his.

Giving evidence at the High Court in London, where she is contesting his claim against her for around £100,000, the woman said that what had happened was a ‘great scar on my life and on all of us’.

Yeah, she’s sorry now because she’s being held accountable for her actions. Women are never sorry for the shit they pull on men unless they are caught.

Wipe those crocodile tears away bitch.

Good on this guy for suing her though. If he’s successful it’ll be a significant step against paternity fraudster whores, although ideally a guy should not have to go through private channels to get justice, paternity fraud should be a criminal matter.

It is the mother’s case that she had no reason to believe A was not the father, and had not deliberately pulled the wool over his eyes.

How the fuck can she expect anyone to believe that she had “no reason” to doubt the guy was the father.

Is she honestly trying to say she couldn’t recall having unprotected sex with another person around that time? No doubt this bitch just named the man as the father because he was the wealthiest one of the men she fucked that year. Whore.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:03 PM

——————————————————-

At 7:23 PM, Lisa said…

It is the mother’s case that she had no reason to believe A was not the father, and had not deliberately pulled the wool over his eyes.

How ridiculously stupid. As if you get pregnant by sitting on a wet towel. Of course she had to of had reason to believe he may not be the dad.

I can’t imagine how damaged the little boy is going to be over all of this. He would now be about 10. Half his life he believed he knew his father. I’m sure he had love for the man and that love was returned. How completely gross. The son should be able to sue the mother some day too.

——————————————————-

At 8:56 PM, Javier said…

Dollars to donuts says (1) the man will lose the case as the court will rule that there is now a father-son bond, regardless of any actions the woman caused, (2) therefore, the man will have to pay an outrageous child support bill until the child is 18, (3) the mother will now get a tax-free check each month from the man, and (4) the woman will get off scott-free, write a book about her ordeals, appear on Oprah (crying, of course), and the world will see HER as the victim in all of it.

Makes me want to puke.

——————————————————-

At 9:14 PM, ColdHammer said…

WAHHHHHH!

Keep crying and keep walking!

You’re not going to get any tears from me.

——————————————————-

At 9:43 PM, zed said…

Hey, Duncan, on the page you linked to, there was a link to an even more preposterous story –check it out.

——————————————————-

At 9:57 PM, Male Rights Network said…

Yeah, she’s sorry now because she’s being held accountable for her actions.

Precisely. She’s only playing the “poor me, I’m sorry” card because she feels she may need to do such a thing. She may feel that the Courts may swing in favour of the father who was a victim of fraud, which is unlikely anyway because of the Matriarchal nature of Western legal system. Check the case up further and you’ll find the father is being given significant sympathy and may even win the case.

The female is afraid and adapts to become “sorry”. She’s not one bit sorry. If she was truly decent she would have resolved it out-of-court rather than commit fraud against him. Being “sorry” implies some sort of concept of morals; of right and wrong. If she has any morals she will see that she’s completely in the wrong and she’s defending the indefensible.

Being “sorry” is simply an adaptation for the parasitic Western female.

——————————————————-

At 10:18 PM, Anonymous said…

Don’t be silly, Duncan. Of course she had no reason to believe A wasn’t the father. She’d had half a shandy a week or so before the alleged conception, so she couldn’t remember a thing and wouldn’t have consented anyway oh no no no so you see it was rape anyway and what kind of court is it that will fail recognise that she must be compensated immediately for her victimisation at the hands of the evil patriarchy. Baaaaaad man. No liberty. No human rights.

——————————————————-

At 10:26 PM, mfsob said…

Yeah, she’s sorry ONLY because she didn’t get away with it.

This guy is fucked, the pussy pass gets ’em out every-single-time.

——————————————————-

At 11:04 PM, ditchthebitch said…

Women are incapable of accountability because they are amoral like an animal- but I digress.. I have, in fact, seen- like everyone else, dogs hang their heads in shame and scurry to a corner to hide when they’ve been bad. So I don’t mean to be so insulting… to dogs. So one can only deduce that human women are below a dog on a mental and spiritual plain.

——————————————————-

At 11:24 PM, arnold ziffel said…

In the U.S. there is a big difference between getting a judgement in your favor (i.e. winning the case) and collecting on the judgement you have been awarded. The defrauded male may win the case but he may not be able to recover any money from the woman.

As Javier pointed out, he may be considered to have formed a father-child bond with the son. If so, it is conceivable that he could win the case (get a judgement that he was a victim of paternity fraud) and still be required to pay child support. If such a result occurs this case could be one of those landmark cases in which the result is so unjust and contrary to common sense (although logical under current legal principles) that a large segment of society finally acknowledges that there exists a systemic injustice that should be corrected.

But given current gender politics I’m not going to count on any larger good coming out of this sad affair. Perhaps the best that can reasonably be hoped for is that the victim of paternity fraud is exempted from future support payments and gets a judgement for monetary damages against the woman. Such a case would at least establish one good precedent in the fight against paternity fraud.

——————————————————-

At 11:38 PM, M. said…

No mercy on these harpies and their crocodile tears!!

She knew what she was doing all along, and didn’t believe she would be caught. Typical AW arrogance and insanity.

——————————————————-

At 5:35 AM, MarkyMark said…

Javier,

Don’t forget that the gov’t agency responsible for CS collection gets a cut, i.e. a piece of the action-what a racket! That’s yet another reason the court will rule against the poor, defrauded SOB…

MarkyMark

——————————————————-

At 6:15 AM, za german said…

‘great scar on my life and on all of us’

Reread:

“great scar on his life and the child’s and a gamble on my side, and even though it was my decision, I was the victim of many men before him and the system, so I got the pass to be free of the responsibility, as what am I supposed to do in this big big world with my only commodity being my p++sy”

“…and on all of us”… NO, you f**ked the life of two innocents for your own good.

——————————————————-

At 2:05 PM, Age 36 American Woman said…

I am a 36-year old American woman, and I am embarrassed by the treacherous behavior of our women.

The death of the family sits partially on the shoulders of wild women who don’t know how to be wives, and can’t stop partying enough to learn.

About 3 years ago, I started paying close attention to relationship dynamics. Lately, I visit sites like yours and I have observed something that startled me at first… men want to be husbands and fathers. They want to be loved and respected, and to provide stability in return.

Women haven’t learned how to serve, and as a remedy, they make sure the men are labeled as villains to justify the whole scene.

It has gone from bad to worse, and only calamity can follow this decline.

——————————————————-

At 4:30 PM, Jerkmenistan said…

She may have thought it was his son when she discovered she was pregnant, but she MUST have had some thought (however fleeting) that there was a chance it wasn’t his son. Rather than rock the boat, she simply decided to keep silent.

——————————————————-

At 7:13 PM, Patriarchal Phoenix said…

Ahhh… Each and every day, more and more evidence that being single is the way to go piles up!!!

Western Society is heading straight into a brick wall.

More and more guys are waking up.

More and more women are being fated to never being a bride/wife/mother.

Yep, I would have given a damn if I thought it was possible to change course. But alas, computer games are more interesting, and have less hassle than a modern western women…

I am a 36-year old American woman, and I am embarrassed by the treacherous behavior of our women.

The death of the family sits partially on the shoulders of wild women who don’t know how to be wives, and can’t stop partying enough to learn.

About 3 years ago, I started paying close attention to relationship dynamics. Lately, I visit sites like yours and I have observed something that startled me at first… men want to be husbands and fathers. They want to be loved and respected, and to provide stability in return.

Women haven’t learned how to serve, and as a remedy, they make sure the men are labeled as villains to justify the whole scene.

It has gone from bad to worse, and only calamity can follow this decline.

Wow. While I’m glad that you are among one of the rare women who gets it, I consider it absolutely tragic that at age 36 it is startling new information to you that men want to be loved and respected and are willing to give a lot in return for that.

The hatchet job which has been done on men’s characters in the past 40 years is that complete.

(sigh)

The family has been systematically destroyed and men and women turned against each other. There have been so many atrocities committed on both sides of this stupid “war” that everyone has completely lost their ability to trust a member of the opposite sex.

Feminism gave women a convenient excuse to act completely selfishly and always be able to blame a man, or all men, for whatever she does. Through a creeping set of laws passed to “protect” the delicate flowers that women are, and their oh-so-sensitive and all important “feeeee-yuhhhlll-ings”, every sort of friendly or warm interaction with women has been gradually criminalized. There are so many laws against dealing with women that about the only way a man can avoid running afoul of the law any more is to simply give women as wide a berth as possible.

If anything is ever going to be salvaged of this mess, then women are going to have to start speaking out loudly and harshly against feminism and its intent to remake the sexes in the image of a Marxist utopia. Anything a man says can and will be dismissed through hundreds of techniques refined and honed over the years to make everything his fault. Any time a man speaks out, lots of people try to silence him with personal attacks and make him defend himself personally instead of making his point.

If women want better relationships in the future between men and women, they are going to have to take some responsibility and expend some effort in bringing that about. Women certainly have cooperated in advancing the feminist agenda by stepping up to defend one part of it or another, all the while claiming that they are “not like that.”

The biggest thing any woman who wants a relationship for herself is going to have to do is give up her princess/entitlement mentality, stop waiting for the handsome prince to beg at the base of her tower, and go out and take the initiative in meeting men and letting them know you are interested in getting to know them. Otherwise, women are selecting for the most aggressive, sociopathic men.

——————————————————-

At 8:33 PM, Lisa said…

Mikeray, I just read this article on another newswire. I’m so pleased the Grand Jury saw things from the husband’s perspective. We can’t count our chickens just yet though. An indictment isn’t anywhere near a conviction.

——————————————————-

At 3:45 AM, k-dog said…

The Texas story reminds me of an old joke.

A man finds out his wife is cheating on him regularly, so he decides to hire a hitman. He meets the hitman at a house across the street from where the wife’s lover lives. The man’s wife arrives at the lover’s house, and the husband and the hitman soon see through a window that the wife and the lover are having a good time.

The husband tells the hitman, “Okay, here’s what I want you to do. Shoot her in the head and shoot his dick off.”

The hitman looks through his rifle scope, draws a bead, and then says to the husband, “Hey, I can do both with one shot!”

——————————————————-

At 6:46 AM, Anonymous said…

you can indict a ham sandwich in a grand jury.

——————————————————-

At 11:50 AM, RazzmaN said…

hahaha!

Dude, I just love your blog especially the content. Am myself a soon-to-be bachelor and totally support your stance.

Is she honestly trying to say she couldn’t recall having unprotected sex with another person around that time? No doubt this bitch just named the man as the father because he was the wealthiest one of the men she fucked that year. Whore.

I love the way women just “forget” things when it is convenient for them to do so. Love it love it love it.

Reason #249018412098241 to watch women’s behavior and not words, which are in fact irrelevant

And reason #421098421098390428 to have a vasectomy.

If you’re counting, that is also reason #18904871907583987210670984789037+ to NOT GETTING MARRIED!

——————————————————-

At 9:45 AM, Anonymous said…

try this link (Fox News) – a woman in the US offered to sell time with her 7 year old daughter for pornographic pictures to an undercover cop.

And it’s only ever men that abuse children right?

——————————————————-

At 10:23 AM, mikeray said…

A 16-YEAR-OLD boy who was acquitted on Friday night of multiple rape was locked up for almost a year awaiting trial.

Patrick Waring, then a 15-year-old Catholic college student, was dragged out of bed by police a year ago and refused bail on nothing but the say-so of a lying 17-year-old girl who cried rape.

——————————————————-

At 2:14 PM, Anonymous said…

lol. why do they call it paternity fraud. it is a lot worse than fraud.

it is one of my worst nightmares. id rather be raped in a prison shower like derik in american history x than be a victim of paternity “fraud” like this.

where is her real punishment for this rape? are the kids going to be brought up by an unrehabilitated rapist?

——————————————————-

At 3:48 PM, ChicagoMan said…

Zed, Women speaking out against feminism?

For the most part that’ll never happen because that would mean that many princesses are going to lose special privileges.

This would mean changing the very character of women as a whole, whom themselves are selfish creatures, into non-selfish ones.

Maybe in the animal kingdom such as in bees altruistic behavior exists in females, it does not however in humans.

Ever watch Meerkat Manor? The women are just as bad there.

The only way to beat feminism is to TAKE it away, not ask women to give it up. Why would most women give it up? An easy excuse for advancement, an excuse to debase themselves and act like children, to get handouts. LOL that’ll never happen.

The marriage strike is one way.

Getting Manginas and PUA to listen is a second.

If the churches would grow some balls for once that would be another.

As I see it, we have a couple of decades to save our society before Radical Islam comes in and does it for us.

——————————————————-

At 5:19 PM, R. Daneel Olivaw said…

It is the mother’s case that she had no reason to believe A was not the father, and had not deliberately pulled the wool over his eyes.

Bitch should be locked up for perjury. Anyone with a brain can not believe that for a fucking minute.

-R. Daneel Olivaw

——————————————————-

At 8:11 PM, zed said…

ChicagoMan said…

Zed, Women speaking out against feminism?

For the most part that’ll never happen because that would mean that many princesses are going to lose special privileges.

This would mean changing the very character of women as a whole, whom themselves are selfish creatures, into non-selfish ones.

Not at all – in the not too distant future, being anti-feminist will be a selfish and self-serving position for women.

Feminism is completely built on fundamental falsehoods. One can only pretend that reality does not exist for a period of time, then the consequences come due. Women were never any more “oppressed” on the average than men were, the kind of world they had depended on their own choices and preferences, and women generally create the kind of men that they feel will be most useful to them.

However, in their short-term greed they have killed the goose which laid the golden eggs of a lifetime of support, and cashed in their marriage annuities for the short-term cash value of child support and the ability to party and screw away their most fertile years.

Here in the US, there are now a record number of births outside of wedlock. This is not due to teenage pregnancy as most people assume (teen pregnancy has actually fallen recently) but rather to large numbers of women in their fertile years deciding to go the single motherhood route. Over the next 20 years these women are going to lead very difficult lives, during a time when sympathy for them is falling through the floor.

A great line I saw recently sums it all up –
“Thanks to feminism, one paycheck can no longer support a family. Thanks to MGTOW, it no longer has to.”

——————————————————-

At 11:04 PM, Anonymous said…

A joke here in India goes like this:

What does an Indian man do in his spare time?
Ans: He likes to find out who his grandfather, great grandfather and so on were.