During the Great Depression, John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich Hayek were building their economic models. After fighting out their fundamental differences at various debates, Keynes prevailed. But Hayek didn’t quit and was awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1974.

Hayek was an ardent believer in Classical Liberalism during a time when its feasibility was being questioned because of the Great Depression. With his in-depth understanding of Economies and Politics, Hayek was able to grab people’s attention to his arguments. Hayek built on, what started as the simple concept of ‘laissez faire’ and redefined its meaning to a philosophical one. Most people know him for merely economics, but his plan was much larger than that. Hayek believed that larger social ends could be achieved by changing the economic system.

Early Life

Born into an Austrian family of limited means, Hayek’s early lessons were about poverty and suffering. He served in the army during World War I, an experience that inspired him to look at what’s wrong with the society. Hayek was moved by the destructive effects of war on the economy and human dignity.

Later Hayek studied at the University of Vienna, where his association with the Austrian School of Economics began. Soon Hayek, along with the Austrian School, launched an attack on socialism. They wanted to dismantle the misconception of the “welfare state”. Hayek began writing several scholarly articles, including his most famous work The Road to Serfdom. This highly controversial book became an international bestseller. In the book, Hayek argued that by countries like the US Britain would unwittingly go down the same road as Soviet Russia if they continued embracing massive government welfare state programs.

After a long stint with the London School of Economics, Hayek moved to the University of Chicago, where he published two more books that brought him a lot of acclaim.

Hayek and the Business Cycle

Hayek believed the state to be an inefficient allocator of resources. The state really has no way to know what’s best for the people. Only the people themselves have full or partial knowledge of their interests and, therefore, the choices must be made by them alone.

In his book Prices and Production (1931), Hayek wrote about the evils of a centrally planned economy. His works show that such a system creates artificial demand and distorts price signals. Often, stimulus provided by the central authority gives rise to inflationary pressures and exerts a downward pressure on the interest rate. This discourages savings and people tend to overspend. This in turn leads producers to believe that there is demand for their products. In order to capitalize on this demand, the producers expand their production, bringing about a period of boom in the economy. While this may sound great at first, the joy is short-lived. The moment the central authority removes or reduces the stimulus, a reverse cycle takes place and the producers suddenly realize that there was no real demand for their products! As producers scramble to minimize their losses, layoffs take place and the situation worsens. This finally results in a period of downturn in the economy, characterized by high unemployment and high inflation.

Hayek on Price Signals

In a scholarly article named The Use of Knowledge in Society, published first in September 1945, Hayek wrote, “Fundamentally, in a system where the knowledge of the relevant facts is dispersed among many people, prices can act to coordinate the separate actions of different people… The most significant fact about this system is the economy of knowledge with which it operates, or how little the individual participants need to know in order to be able to take the right action.”

Hayek explained that any change in the price of a commodity reflects its availability. When the price of a commodity rises, one of two things can happen. The producer can increase his production and bring down the costs (through economies of scale). On the other hand, some consumers may choose not to continue consuming the product, on account of the price rise, which brings down the demand and eventually the price.

Prices perform the function of a language in economic transactions, Hayek said, adding that a free price system would not only allow individuals to maximize their own interests, but would also result in the allocation of resources at a socially optimum level.

Friedrich Hayek has influenced politicians and economists throughout the 20th century. His works continue to be researched and studied by economists even to this day.

Leave a Reply

I am…

Rakesh Wadhwa. Ever since, I was a school boy, I knew India was on the wrong path. Socialism was just not what we needed to get ahead. Government controlled our travel; government controlled our ability to buy and sell; and government controlled our freedom to move our money. My life has focused on the inherent rights people have. When I was in college, I never understood, what the governments meant by their "socialistic attitude". If people are free to buy, sell and move their capital themselves without any restrictions by state, then the welfare of people is inevitable & hence the countries they live in will become wealthy. The government has no right whatsoever, to point a finger at me or my business. I am not a revolutionary. I just want to light up my cigarette and not get nagged about it. I believe in non-interfering attitude to attain more.

Search My Blog

Download: No Commission Baccarat

Baccarat is played the world over. Whenever you think of casinos, high stakes gambling and elegance, you would automatically associate it with baccarat. What if we could do away with the commission? No Commission Baccarat is a game that eliminates all commission on banker bets! Obviously this gives a HUGE advantage to players.

Join Me On Facebook

The Deal Maker Facebook Fanpage

Bastiat Award

The Bastiat Award is a journalism award, given annually by the International Policy Network, London.
Bastiat Prize entries are judged on intellectual content, the persuasiveness of the language used and the type of publication in which they appear. Rakesh Wadhwa won the 3rd prize (a cash award of $1,000 and a candlestick), in 2006.

My First Book

Yes, India does possess the capacity to overtake the USA and that is precisely what will happen - not in some indeterminate future but by the year 2010. How? That is what the book is all about.

I am…

Rakesh Wadhwa. Ever since, I was a school boy, I knew India was on the wrong path. Socialism was just not what we needed to get ahead. Government controlled our travel; government controlled our ability to buy and sell; and government controlled our freedom to move our money. My life has focused on the inherent rights people have. When I was in college, I never understood, what the governments meant by their "socialistic attitude". If people are free to buy, sell and move their capital themselves without any restrictions by state, then the welfare of people is inevitable & hence the countries they live in will become wealthy.