Interprovincial Barriers to Labour Mobility in Canada:Policy, Knowledge Gaps and Research Issues

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the most important knowledge gaps on interprovincial barriers to labour mobility in Canada, and to shed some light on potential conceptual, methodological, and data issues associated with research in this area. Consequently, it provides an overview of the current state of play with respect to the most important issues relating to inter-provincial barriers to labour mobility within the Canadian internal market. The three main barriers to labour mobility in Canada, which are considered, are: residency requirements; certain practices regarding occupational licensing, certification and registration; and differences in how occupational qualifications are recognized. These are the main regulatory barriers that are to be removed or reduced under Chapter 7, the Labour Mobility Chapter of the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT). It also reviews critically the recent relevant research in Canada and in some other jurisdictions (the United States, the European Union and Australia) on barriers to labour mobility. The paper finds that the most important knowledge gap concerns the extent of the regulatory barriers to labour mobility and their impacts and costs. It also concludes that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the approach of mutual recognition being pursued in Canada to eliminate such regulatory barriers. However, while there has been a fair degree of success in Canada in achieving occupation-specific Mutual Recognition Agreements for occupational qualifications and reconciliation of differences in occupational standards, this progress has been too slow. Moreover, the functioning of the dispute resolution mechanism with respect to
Chapter 7, is overly complex and inaccessible. The dispute resolution mechanism in the Alberta-B.C. Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement is stronger and simpler than that of the AIT, and definitely one to be considered as a model to improve the AIT.

Item Type:

MPRA Paper

Original Title:

Interprovincial Barriers to Labour Mobility in Canada:Policy, Knowledge Gaps and Research Issues

Agreement on Labour Mobility and Recognition of Qualifications, Skills and Work Experience in the Construction Industry (2006) Between the Government of Ontario and the Gouvernement du Québec , June 2, 2006.

Audus, Rick and James Ted McDonald (2003) “Employment Insurance and Geographic Mobility: Evidence from the SLID,” Social Research Demonstration Corporation Working Paper Series 03-03, April.

Australian Productivity Council (2003) “Evaluation of Mutual Recognition Schemes,” Research Report, October 8.

COMPASS (2004) “Interprovincial Trade Barriers: Seriously Damaging to the Economy and Standard of Living and Almost as Harmful as Canada-U.S. Barriers,” BDO Dunwoody/Chamber Weekly CEO/ Business Leader Poll published in Financial Post, September 13, 2004.

Macmillan, Kathleen and Patrick Grady (2007) “Inter-provincial Barriers to Internal Trade in Goods, Services and Capital,” paper prepared for Industry Canada and Human Resources and Social Development Canada, March 31.