I need help deciding on which pistol to order. I have boiled it down to the ATP, M9 Tac, and the 1911 Mk II.

Let it be known that I have held IRL versions of each pistol and I am fine with the grip of all three, however, I also realize that the ATP will not feel all that much like a real glock due to the design changes. I simply want input on which of the three wins in the categories of accuracy, durability, and reliability.
FPS probably needs to stay in the 330 range, but I think all three stay around that.

I was about to write the M9 off the list, but a different post noted that it was a very well refined model seeing as how old it was, so I am reconsidering. Just tell me which of the three you think is the best and why.
EDIT: Thinking about it now, I might just have to get the ATP because I can buy a 48 round mag for it...

Out of the three, we have the MKII & M9.
The 1911 is a great gun. The drawback is the Mags. There hard to find. I had three HC mags my son lost one in the woods, i sold the other two.
It seems the mag release button can be pressed by mistake causing the mag to fall out. Someone said to file down the release button. I think he's going to sell it as is.
I only see a few 14rd Mags online around $48 each.

The M9 is also i very nice gun. 24rd mags are readily available for around $35 each. The mag release button is harder to hit by mistake.
He has the non tac M9 due to the use of this holster http://www.ebay.com/...=item461152deb5

I need help deciding on which pistol to order. I have boiled it down to the ATP, M9 Tac, and the 1911 Mk II.

Let it be known that I have held IRL versions of each pistol and I am fine with the grip of all three, however, I also realize that the ATP will not feel all that much like a real glock due to the design changes. I simply want input on which of the three wins in the categories of accuracy, durability, and reliability.
FPS probably needs to stay in the 330 range, but I think all three stay around that.

I was about to write the M9 off the list, but a different post noted that it was a very well refined model seeing as how old it was, so I am reconsidering. Just tell me which of the three you think is the best and why.
EDIT: Thinking about it now, I might just have to get the ATP because I can buy a 48 round mag for it...

its gonna come down to price. Ive ruled out the 1911 (sorry!) because of a lack of high cap mags for it.
If i can get the ATP auto locally for a good price, then i will go with that. if i cant, i may decide to order either the ATP, M9 tac, or ATP auto used. when buying used, you never know what will be the best deal, so it will likely come down to whatever i can find...

its gonna come down to price. Ive ruled out the 1911 (sorry!) because of a lack of high cap mags for it.
If i can get the ATP auto locally for a good price, then i will go with that. if i cant, i may decide to order either the ATP, M9 tac, or ATP auto used. when buying used, you never know what will be the best deal, so it will likely come down to whatever i can find...

I prefer the ATP, but that's because the M9, as nice as it is, is too big in my hand. Price wise, the ATP wins hands down. Just add in an enhanced metal spring guide and call it a day. It's my go to field sidearm.

probably gonna attempt to get the ATP before looking at M9 deals, as the atp is 0.8 pounds lighter than the M9...
welp... another look at the m9, i like how it has more conventional features like a manual safety, exposed hammer, decocking lever, etc...

just gonna try to go to an airsoft store and hold both. if i cant it will just come down to price.

found an airsoft store, but they only had the 1911 mk IV and the cz...
gotta say, im leaning towards the m9 tactical, but i dont know of any good holsters for it (serpa doesnt make a holster for one with a rail, only for the older version)

if you know of any good m9 tac holsters, i would appreciate a link for them...

m9 serpas are made for the version without a rail (its more common in real handguns)
i kinda want the railed version, so i would prefer to find an alternate holster rather than buying the non railed version

well now i really dont want the m9 because of the exposed barrel...
1911 is back into comparison, and from what it felt like i might just buy that and forget about the high cap mags...
yeah, gonna have to do that. i know that real glocks are safe without an exposed hammer and such, but i wouldnt feel comfortable without at least some form of manual safety...

the airsoft store i went to was selling the mk IV for like 180 dollars, not sure why. that is way too expensive since i can order it online for like 150...
gonna have to find the correct holster, but there are like 3 different serpas for 1911s so im sure one of them will work.

i think the holsters are all the same. Our MKII & USP Compact are Tacs the M9 is not.
The only problem i had was the USP compact Tac, It would not fit in a USP Compact serpa holster.
Not because of the slot/rail The front sight is taller on the USP compact Tac so you can aim over the mock suppressor.

I ordered the regular USP compact front sight from KWA for a few bucks. Change out the tall sight for the regular front sight, now it fits inside the serpa holster fine.

blackhawk makes two different holsters for real steel 1911s, one for the commander style and one for the govt. style.
from picture comparisons, it looks like the commander is the mk II and the govt. is the mk IV.
when i get it, i will try to buy the govt for the mk IV and return it if it doesnt quite fit.

blackhawk makes two different holsters for real steel 1911s, one for the commander style and one for the govt. style.
from picture comparisons, it looks like the commander is the mk II and the govt. is the mk IV.
when i get it, i will try to buy the govt for the mk IV and return it if it doesnt quite fit.