This is just a simulated bomb exploding at Naval Station Everett in Washington State on October 25, but the Navy's tweeting that impending budget cuts represent live-fire fiscal bombs. Photo: U.S. Navy

Navy Tweets How Budget Cuts Will Sink Its Fleet, Ground Its Planes

This is just a simulated bomb exploding at Naval Station Everett in Washington State on Oct. 25, but the Navy's tweeting that impending budget cuts represent live-fire fiscal bombs. Photo: U.S. Navy

If automatic Pentagon budget cuts go through as scheduled next week, the Navy is going to grind its major operations practically to a halt. Or at least that’s the message it’s sending on social media.

The Navy’s top public-affairs officer, Rear Adm. John Kirby, tweeted out an updated plan Tuesday for how the Navy absorbs billions of dollars in budget cuts scheduled to take effect on March 1. The deployments of 10 destroyers will be cancelled, including seven tasked with missile defense. Four aircraft-carrier air wings will be “shut down.” The Navy will “Reduce Investment in ships, aircraft, weapons, R&D” by $7.75 billion. Should a crisis break out somewhere in the world in 2013, only one aircraft carrier strike group will be available for deployment.

Turns out the aircraft carriers are just the beginning of the Navy’s expected woes. There will be “immediate coverage gaps” in multiple military commands worldwide, according to the Navy plan. No amphibious ready groups will be prepared to go into crisis zones. The Marines’ version of the F-35 stealth fighter won’t go into flight testing on the USS Wasp. There won’t be any Navy operations in South America. And all of this is on top of the Navy’s recent announcement that it expects to build fewer surface ships than it had planned for years.

It’s debatable how much this Navy planning is intended to pressure Congress and President Obama to work out a deal averting the cuts ahead of the March 1 deadline. At least one commentator thinks the Navy’s public cries of impending penury are inappropriate. “The Navy could have cut back other, less-sensitive deployments or acquisition programs,” Ralph Peters wrote in the New York Post last week. “But the Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chose to embarrass the White House and pressure Congress. He should have been fired.”

As Sam LaGrone of the U.S. Naval Institute wrote for Danger Room last week, the Navy’s making a specific gamble with its deployment cuts and their impact on short-term naval readiness. It’s sacrificing what it does in the near-term in order to preserve its long-term, high-budget shipbuilding plans, which take years to come to fruition.

But the Navy’s social-media plan already is. It took the unusual step of tweeting its budget documents shortly after sending it to Congress. Congress is out of session this week — indicating that Navy is diving into the blue waters of public opinion to save its money.