Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Saturday, 31 August 2013

They’re working through their “list of suspects”, about to
interview “many persons of interest”; are actively “probing new leads” and,
apparently, the “hunt is making good progress”.

Thus far, Scotland Yard has stopped short of stating that
Madeleine McCann will be home for Christmas, as was once famously decreed on
television by the EARLIER hired help, METODO 3, but there's time yet.

That ridiculous assertion aside, there’s little to separate the
Yard’s apparent lines of inquiry from the other, concocted avenues of
investigation, as pursued by the seemingly innumerable private detective agencies placed in the employ of the parents of the most famous missing child
of all time.

In case you’ve forgotten, METODO 3 were the Spanish
Detective Agency drafted in by the McCanns to usurp the Polícia Judiciária, the official
investigators into the case of missing Madeleine, once
the Portuguese authorities started turning their attention to the McCann’s
themselves.

Funded by many hundreds of thousands of pounds from kind
donors to the ‘Looking for Madeleine’ Fund, (along with other resources), this
small time Spanish debt collection agency came up with some BIG time fables:-

From the swarthy vagabonds of Morocco, to the foothills of
African drug hideouts; from Arab paedophiles to the bustling streets of Bosnia;
our intrepid heroes were, seemingly, hot on the trails of Madeleine’s
“abductors”, flying from one destination to the next.

Once it transpired, however, that the several hundred thousand pounds
lavished on the company had returned, precisely NOTHING, and critics in the press were starting to question their veracity, their services were
dispensed with, or at least limited, from around mid 2008.

The Spanish hotshots were last heard of being uncomfortably
embroiled in illegal Political espionage, phone tapping allegations, drug
smuggling and money laundering.

Not to be deterred by one charlatan, however, the McCann’s then turned to what was described as an un-named
“secret” AMERICAN detective agency, composed of, (according to the Telegraph),
"ex- FBI and CIA agents who were offered a contract of £500,000”.

“These really are the big boys." A ‘friend’ of Kate
McCann was quoted as saying.

This particular company, eventually metamorphosing into and revealed to
be Oakley International, was headed by Kevin Halligen, a man now enjoying notoriety
for being imprisoned for fraud on a huge, multi-million Dollar scale.

Big boys, indeed!

There has, in total, been an estimated SIX firms of private
detectives/agencies/mercenaries, etc involved in the search for Madeleine.

It has been alleged that several of them were involved in
intimidating witnesses or paying for individuals to make false “sightings”;
i.e.; to allege that they had seen the little girl or someone closely
resembling her at some specified location or another.

Of course, at present, those allegations cannot be
categorically proven.

What CAN be proven, however, is that amongst the very many
stories, sightings and escapades that these detective agencies profess to have
been involved in, not ONE of
them has a single iota of credibility or evidence to substantiate them.

Stories that generated a great many column inches and
broadcast news reports in the Media.

Not ONE of
them has a single shred of tangible evidence to support them.

But NOW,
seemingly, that is all about to change.

For NOW,
after investigations conducted by the Portuguese Police, (along with the Leicestershire
Police), and the detective agencies listed above, the McCann’s have procured
the services of the Metropolitan Police’s infamous SCOTLAND YARD, surely THE
vanguard of investigative agencies everywhere.

Quite how the
Met became embroiled in this is a story all on its own, of course.

Ostensibly
commissioned to undertake a “review of the case so far" by Premier David
Cameron, as an act of kindness to the McCann’s, (an act which is without
precedent whatsoever in the annals of Police or political history); this
actually only came about when pressure was exerted by the Rupert MURDOCH press,
via correspondences between former News International Chief executive Rebekah
Brooks, Cameron and Home Secretary Theresa May where Brook allegedly THREATENED,
(or “persuaded”, as Brooks herself confessed to the Leveson report), to ensure
that MAY and others in the Cabinet got bad front-page Press unless the review was ordered:-

Brooks: "I was certainly part of a strategy to launch a
campaign in order to get a review for the McCanns," Brooks says, disputing
that it was a "threat".
Leveson: "Give me another word for it, would you?"
Brooks: "Persuade?"

Whoever, however or whatever, the astonishing fact remains
that the McCann’s have managed to enlist the services of what has, for many
years, been widely regarded as one of the finest Police forces in the world
after the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom was “persuaded” to order them to
undertake an “investigative review” of their case.

As I type
this, the current state of affairs is this:-

Operation
Grange, as Scotland Yard’s undertaking is called, is moving from a “review”
inquiry to an “investigative” inquiry, headed by Detective Chief Inspector Andy
Redwood of Scotland Yard’s Homicide and Serious Command.

The McCann’s
themselves are said to be “satisfied”, “grateful” and “delighted” for the Met’s
involvement, and to “warmly welcome it”, presumably not least for the fact that
Redwood states he rejected the "conspiracy theories" about the
parents' involvement and was focusing on "a criminal act by a
stranger."

Redwood has also been quoted as saying
“We continue to believe there is a possibility that Madeleine is alive”.

How this investigation will unfold can only remain to be
seen.

For the record, and not for the FIRST time, I want to put my
position on this case in print:-

I have NO idea what happened to Madeleine McCann in Praia da
Luz in May 2007.

I wasn’t there.

Furthermore, the testimonies of those that WERE there widely
contradict each other, as a consequence of which it is impossible to derive an
accurate picture of what happened.

What I WILL say is that I believe, having studied the
available Police files, Rogatory statements and contributory documentation,
witness statements and testimonies, including those made by the McCann’s themselves,
(as well as those of their friends); that the events, circumstances and situations
that they describe, and which they and their seemingly endless entourage of
wealthy Lawyers, business friends, Politicians and PR companies continue to
insist happened; cannot possibly have occurred.

Additionally, evidence unquestionably exists which suggests
a cover up or, at the very least, an obfuscation of the facts relating to the
missing girl.

Furthermore, I also firmly believe that, were anyone else to
undertake the same studies, they too would arrive at the same conclusions.

That is NOT to say that I believe that the McCann’s murdered
their daughter or that they were complicit in any one of the innumerable
theories that proliferate on the internet.

Just that, like many unsolved cases, the Madeleine McCann
case invariably poses more questions than answers.

And at the risk of FURTHER repeating myself, my main,
overriding angst with this case is not that those questions remain unanswered;

It’s that they aren’t being asked.

I should ALSO like to place on record that I have very
little faith in Scotland Yard’s “investigation”. It is clear from the Press
quotations made by DCI Redwood that he intends to pursue the fabricated or
redundant avenues of investigation as previously pursued by the agencies listed
above.

Of course, it may well be that Redwood's men conduct a THOROUGH, proficient, professional and far-reaching investigation.

In which case I will be MORE than willing to accept the Yards’
findings PROVIDED they can answer, and provide credible evidence and answers for, the
following:-

When was Madeleine McCann abducted when, according to the
testimonies and statements of the McCann’s and their friends, there was NO real
‘window’ of opportunity for her abduction to have taken place?

HOW was Madeleine abducted when the only conceivable, (and
purported), method, was via a window far too small to pass through, especially
if carrying a child?

Why is there NO forensic evidence of any abductor?

Why is the only purported evidence of an abduction, (Jane
Tanners sighting of a ‘man’), contradicted by two other witnesses, INCLUDING
Gerry McCann himself, and why has Tanner’s description of that ‘man’ changed on
several occasions?

How and why has Operation Grange chosen to ignore the overwhelming
evidence of the Enhanced Victim Recovery, (EVR), dogs which points to
cadaverine and other suspicious fluids/substances being present in the McCann’s
holiday apartment, as well as on many of the McCann’s personal possessions and
in their hire car, and ONLY IN THOSE PLACES?

How does Scotland Yard propose to assert that those dogs
were WRONG, when they have hitherto NEVER being wrong where their services and skills contributed to
solving very many cases investigated by many Constabularies across the UK and
elsewhere?

Given the above, how and why does DCI Redwood “continue to
believe there is a possibility that Madeleine is alive”?

Any 'investigation' or 'inquiry' that omits to address these few key questions can not be called either.

Moreover, it would be a whitewash.

Even WORSE, I do not rule out Scotland Yard “solving” this case.

It has
been my fear for some time that some unfortunate miscreant will “confess” to
the abduction and murder of Madeleine. Perhaps, as I have hinted at in previous
blogs, one of those now deceased perverts or convicted paedophiles that the
tabloids like to point the finger of suspicion at will be deemed to have made
an irrefutable "deathbed confession".

Even IF, (and I would genuinely and whole-heartedly rejoice along
with everyone else were it the case), Madeleine McCann were actually FOUND
alive and well, I would still assert that those questions above are valid and
demand credible answers.

“SPUDGUN, you’re an evil, depraved NUT!”

Just one on the many regular, abusive emails/tweets that I
receive on a daily basis.

“Who do you think you are, questioning or doubting the
integrity of Scotland Yard. Are you THAT stupid and arrogant to think you’re
better than them”?

Actually, no, I don’t purport for one second to be the equal
of Scotland Yard, or any OTHER investigative body, for that matter.

“This case has been the subject of the most careful
investigation by experienced detectives ... No additional evidence has come to
light. I therefore consider no further investigation is required."

John
Yates, Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner, commenting on being asked to
look further into PHONE TAPPING, just 2 years before almost SIX THOUSAND
victims were revealed to have been tapped, along with the sale of information
to Journalists often with the complicity of the Met Police, and 3 years before Brian
Paddick, a former Acting Assistant Commissioner, took the stand at the Leveson
inquiry to describe what he termed a general "culture of cover-up" at
the Met.

How about Ray Adams, former Scotland Yard Commander who had tangible,
established links to the Brink’s Mat Gold Bullion robbery and well known faces
such as Kenny Noye and Clifford Norris, father of David Norris, convicted for
the murder of Stephen Lawrence?

Or for obfuscation and cover ups at their very finest, have a look at
the murder of Daniel Morgan whose family are still awaiting justice for his
brutal murder. By the Yard’s own admission, there is:

“Clear acknowledgment….that
police corruption was, if not at the heart of the case, a contributing factor”.

From the murder and cover up of Blair Peach in 1979, through the cases of
Damilola Taylor, Jill Dando, Jean Charles de Menzes to name but a FEW, up to the
killing of Ian Tomlinson at the G20 Summit protests.

All these cases illustrate corruption, and sometime complicity, duplicity
and invariably a COVER up by the Metropolitan Police.

So you will have to excuse me if I don’t share the same confidence as
others in the Scotland Yard ‘investigation’.

Above all else, I am abundantly aware that this is a
review/investigation the McCann’s desperately wanted. An outcome that, by her
own admission, Rebekah Brooks campaigned for on the McCann’s behalf by using
what was alleged to be “threats; what she preferred to call “persuasion”.

Such an investigation, if, or rather WHEN, it concludes that Madeleine was indeed, abducted by persons known or unknown, will serve as the official SEAL of approval; a final act of authoritative intervention, designed to STOP the theorising, the conjecture, the questions and the doubts.

In the light of that belief, it is difficult to see how Scotland Yard could
come up with anything that contradicts what ‘Team McCann’ purports to be the
official chain of events surrounding Madeleine’s disappearance.

15 comments:

Hello Janosch. Yes, I have already read that. Unfortunately, I'm afraid I don't share your faith and trust in Jane Tanner, nor in Kate McCann's description of how she found the apartment windows. Or indeed, in much ELSE they describe or attest to in their statements.

PS: I DO so hope, Janosch, you're not still threatening and abusing certain good friends of mine in Spain ? :-)

Eh, eh, eh...Crack detectives! Only if that means they hitting the crack(drugs), lol! It could well be the case, only someone under the influence of "something" would come up with the theory that Madeleine is being held in a hellish lair just 10 miles from Praia da Luz, as he told the Belfast Telegraph in 13/09/2009, but curiously is O.K. with leaving her there till this day, no searches done!

And...for those who have maligned and defamed the PJ (portuguese police) over the Mccann case ("bungling cops", "sardine munchers" and other similar "gems"), those who acclaim the "superiority" and "integrity" of the "infallible" british police, I suggest searching information on the Nicholas Bento case, which also involves the FSS, a BIG blunder, which brought on Mr. Bento a conviction of a life sentence for a crime he did not commit.

Excellent posting Spudgun! Factual, informative and persuasive. It helped me sustain my views about what is most likely to have happened to Madeleine.

Oh! By the way, ignore that anonymous who wrote "you are wrong" comment. He is referring you to a blog run by a self-styled university graduate who tries to enforce the theory the child was abducted with somewhat logical but poorly differentiated and distorted arguments.

The graduate bases his theory on the PJ Files and (put your seat belts on!) on the book "Madeleine" written by Kate McCann!!!

He completely ignores G. Amaral's theory but then, given the Spaniards' highly prejudiced views of their independent Portuguese neighbours, that is quite understandable (...)

Likewise, the graduate ignores the mis-en-scene, the ideological and political context, the reputation management, the lies, the contradictions and the U-turns of the eternal suspects; all in all, the most relevant and telling bytes.

I would not be surprised to find the graduate is on the payroll of Clarence Mitchell's Burson-Marsteller reputation management E-fluentials and/or Crowdverb departments!

------------------------------------------------

;) There is a new e-book just out! Recommended reading to all graduates!

the murat rear garden was excavated thoroughly, with real experts, which birch is not, and nothing relevant was found. about amaral, he only wanted dirty fame and fortune at the expenses of innocents. this amaral is a fraud, a liar, a corrupt freak.

Thank you for a good round up of events as it is at today. And for the explanation, how I remember it about the Brooks|Cam|May saga.

Vindication comes at a high price. But nothing will ever change the decision the McCanns and friends made with regard to child care arrangements, no matter how big the dollop of RATIONALISATION\PROJECTION

"about amaral, he only wanted dirty fame and fortune at the expenses of innocents. this amaral is a fraud, a liar, a corrupt freak."

No wonder you leave such comments without giving your true name. It is very easy to sling mud anonymously without giving any supporting evidence for allegations. Such statements are completely worthless.

On second thoughts I would estimate that a large percentage of comments favourable to the McCanns "official version" of events are made by Burson Marsteller's operatives as part of Burson-Marsteller's "e-Fluentials" and "Crowdverb" strategies for reputation management.

Some of these are pretty obvious, others not so obvious (for obvious reasons!).

For details of Clarence Mitchell/Burson-Marsteller reputation management strategies "google out", as I just did:

(a) Reputation management(b) E-fluentials(c) Crowdverb

Gosh! I am told Clarence Mitchell is now a candidate for the Conservative Party! Is that so?

Eh, eh, eh...this Janosch character is something else! He's made a video to "prove" how Madeleine indeed could have been abducted in less than one minute through the bedroom window. LOL! What a joke! The man lifts the shutters a few inches, slides the window pane (which was conveniently UNLOCKED, go figure!), pulls the cord and lifts up the rest of the shutter, and then: TCHAM TCHAM THCHAM TCHAMMM, he DOES NOT enter the room to lift Madeleine out of her bed, navigating around the twins cots, as any "abductor" would have to, but instead, he stays outside the window, puts his arm inside the room and he picks up a PILLOW (supposedly Madeleine) from the floor and VOILÀ! Madeleine's got abducted under less than a minute! Or...wait a minute...shouldn't it be "a pillow was abducted in less than a minute"...''?!