Near-death experiences are real and we have the proof, say scientists

Near-death experiences are real and we have the proof, say scientists

Jeanette, a 43-year-old student nurse from Eastbourne, had a near-death experience in 1979 when she was just 18-years-old. It was triggered
when a blood clot in her leg broke up into seven pieces and clogged the main vessels in her lungs, starving her body of oxygen. The doctors were
certain that she would die. She did – but then returned to tell the tale. Read more

scientist are giving near death experience a serious look and it has turned skeptics into believers! some very interesting stories in this article
from people describing light fixtures and objects only visible from the ceiling to people blind from birth able to see in there experience with death.
a lot of scientist now believe the mind and brain are two different things (no news flash there lol)

Originally posted by Memysabu
I dont believe it at all.
Chemicals left over cause the experience.

Brain activity does not cease at the second of death.

According to modern medicine all of these patients were effectively dead. Their brains had shut down and no thoughts or feelings were possible. There
was certainly no possibility of the complex brain activity required for dreaming or hallucinating.

How do you explain that then?.

No brain activity, meaning not only not enough to have lucid dreams or hallucinations, no brain activity at all.

what about the blind being able to see and describing it, or the ones that can describe things on top of light fixtures and shelfs,or people who have
no brain activity for many minutes but can tell the doctors what they were saying in there time of death.its easy to write something off without any
research into it.

Their discovery is very real, and they came to a very good conclusion. Mind and brain are not the same thing.

The brain is a concentration of cells higher than anywhere on the body, BUT all cells have a mind of their own. The mind is everywhere, but because of
that high concentration in the brain, you tend to think your mind is in your head, which is false.

When your brain dies, your mind does not die at all. It just transferes to another state of being, no loger connected to the physical attributes of
the body. This is why NDE feel like you deconnect with your body, but you're still there alive.

Do they connect those little electromagnetic sensors to your head every time you enter the emergency room?

I don't think so....

So yeah they were effectively dead but that was what the electrocardiogram was revealing.

So in most cases of NDE's I doubt the doctors can say the brain was effectively dead. Unless the patient's body is being thoroughly monitored.

-

I believe NDE's are real, but the question is it all just last remnants of brain activity or if you are entering another state of being.

[edit on 9/11/2008 by kingsnake]

So you are quoting most cases of induced coma post infarct?
Or are you speaking specifically about this article of the topic of this post?
Most cases of induced coma including a lucid NDE are not even quoted in the above topics article.
This is a specific program.
Where is your figures or links to these most numbers you quote?
Many of the cases in this specific article, if you would take the time to read it and stop looking like a dyslexic brainwashed fool, do include the
testing of brain activity during the event.

Originally posted by Interestinggg
Many of the cases in this specific article, if you would take the time to read it and stop looking like a dyslexic brainwashed fool, do include the
testing of brain activity during the event.

In medical terms they were “flatliners” or unconscious with no signs of brain activity

According to modern medicine all of these patients were effectively dead.

Except that they weren't, hence 'near-death'.

Wrong. 'NDE' can mean someone was clinically dead, but revived. It is then referred to as 'near'-death because the state was temporary in nature,
whereas 'death' is normally understood as a permanent state.

'Temporary death experience' would be an accurate description in some cases. It is just not a phrase that has caught on.

The unwillingness of some people to open their minds to the possibility their preconceptions are wrong simply does not lend itself to getting to the
bottom of a matter.

Thousands of people have provided evidence of very real consciousness when brain activity has ceased to register on electronic devices, not to mention
people blind from birth finding they could see, or sights and conversations being observed/heard subsequent to a person's near death/death.

There is a lot of evidence out there for those with an honest, open, enquiring mind. Here's just one other thread which addresses the same topic, for
instance:

Raymond Moody is also a solid provider and investigation in this matter.

Interesting read on a possible link to our conception of "soul" and "light" on the one hand and quantumphysical conceptions on light and
information on the other hand is this link
I will translate a snippet out of the article which is in German .

"There are some physicst that have something to say -about NDE and ghostllike appearances- these matters. Lately the Viennese quantumphysicist Prof.
Anton Zeilinger caem with the experimental result which seem to corroborate similar effects in our reality. And also quantumphysicist prof.Hans-Peter
Duerr, formerly leader of the Max Plack institute in Munich, represents this opinion that Dualism of the smallest particles does not only is
represented in the subatomic world, but is allpresent.
The dualism between body and soul is for them just as real as the wave-particle dualism of the smallest particles, so the fact that LIGHT can choose
one form or the other, electromagnetic wave or lightparticle. There must be a quantumcode that reaches through all living and dead matter from here to
the big bang. Consequently Duerr believes in Existence after death"

My own analysis on the subject is focussing on the aspect which follows out the exeperiment of Bell in 1982 (in which light seems to be in two places
at the same time at the moment it is created [the light "knows" where is has to be to exist (detected) even if the space on the subatomic level is
incomprehensible large and such information can logically not be available to the created light "particle"]) In a sense information seems to be
allpresent at that level.

Theories concerning Remote Viewing that are concerned with the information space/time paradox, which I will formulate as "How can we know something
which is happening at another place/time or in another mind while we are physically and electronically shielded from it and only being supplied with
the coordinates of the place? , seem to point in the same direction in my opinion, which is : a timeless grid that is within and outside us and
connects us as human beings and only can be comprehended at this point as light/information independently of the space/time continuum."

Which of course be awesome.

Could it be that our consciousness in a way can stay or hold on/exist in that timeless grid and eventually travel further into unknown regions?

According to modern medicine all of these patients were effectively dead.

Except that they weren't, hence 'near-death'.

Wrong. 'NDE' can mean someone was clinically dead, but revived. It is then referred to as 'near'-death because the state was temporary in nature,
whereas 'death' is normally understood as a permanent state.

'Temporary death experience' would be an accurate description in some cases. It is just not a phrase that has caught on.

The unwillingness of some people to open their minds to the possibility their preconceptions are wrong simply does not lend itself to getting to the
bottom of a matter.

Thousands of people have provided evidence of very real consciousness when brain activity has ceased to register on electronic devices, not to mention
people blind from birth finding they could see, or sights and conversations being observed/heard subsequent to a person's near death/death.

There is a lot of evidence out there for those with an honest, open, enquiring mind. Here's just one other thread which addresses the same topic, for
instance:

Can you answer why many people are revived from death and have no NDE.Someone described it to me as simply waking up after a sleep...ie no
tunnels,lights outer body experiences.So if this a natural phenomena that happens to the conscious,then why do these people not have NDE's...im
pretty sure they have a conscious.Or could it be certain levels of chemicals released that vary person to person due to body chemistry therefore some
people have NDE's and others do not? It is interesting though...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.