Russell “Texas” Bentley

Pages

Thursday, August 17, 2017

My second Twitter has been shut down after a campaign of targeted harassment (which is prohibited by Twitter policy) by pro-nazi propagandists like @GlasnostGone and @discjocke52.
My first account, under my real name was shut down just after I reached 1,000 followers. My second, under the pseudonym "Texac" was shut down after I reached 700 followers. Twitter is supposedly a forum for free speech and the exchange of ideas, however, in reality it has proven to be just another Western propaganda outlet and an instrument for the suppression of free speech.

Here is the appeal to Twitter about my account suspension -

Here's a bit more information about my account suspension. Please see below.
(CLICK ON IMAGES FOR BETTER RESOLUTION)

Twit
1 - Please note that @discjocke52 thanks @GlasnostGone for the TARGETED
HARASSMENT to shut down my Twitter account. Also, please note - DEATH
THREAT comment from @Mike_412.
I live in Donbass, near the front lines in the Donbass War, and I have literally been shot at by Ukrainian snipers. Michael Brourman's comment is literally an incitement to murder.

Twit 2 - Please note
@discjocke52 mentions the TARGETED HARASSMENT campaign orchestrated by
himself and @GlasnostGone that shut down my crowdfunder for publication
of a book. This TARGETED HARASSMENT organized on Twitter cost me
$7,000. Though I made numerous complaints about it, you allowed it to
continue, which caused me real economic damage and emboldened these
propagandists to carry out another TARGETED HARASSMENT campaign to get
my Twitter account suspended.

Twit
4 - These are just SOME of my complaints lodged against @GlasnostGone
and @discjocke52 for TARGETED HARASSMENT AND INCITING VIOLENCE AND DEATH
THREATS. There are, of course more, but these were all that I could fit
in the screenshot.

I am sure I would have made many more
complaints, but @GlasnostGone blocked me from seeing his tweets. Your
response was to allow the harassment and threats to continue.

Twit
5 - Do you understand that @GlasnostGone and @discjocke52 are
supporters of genuine nazis and murderers? If you do not support the
neo-nazis who marched in Charlottesville and murdered one person, how
can you aid and embolden those who support REAL nazis in Ukraine who
have murdered thousands, and who directly incite others to murder me?

Twit
6 - @GlasnostGone, emboldened by your inaction, continues with another
campaign of TARGETED HARASSMENT against Patrick Lancaster's fundraiser
for human aid. This is also, of course, another attempt by @GlasnostGone
to stifle free speech, based on lies, non-sequitur insinuation and
inuendo. And you allow it.

Where is your
sense of decency? Where is your sense of fair play? Where is your
respect for free speech? Why do you allow these pro-nazi
propagandists to continue their targeted harassment and literal death
threats against me and shut down my account?

These
nazi supporters continue their campaigns of targeted harassment as we
speak. They have now targeted Patrick Lancaster's (@PLnewstoday)
fundraiser. You allow them to abuse Twitter (which is supposed to be a
forum for free speech) and to use it to suppress free speech,and
you continue to allow them to make death threats and spread provably
false pro-nazi propaganda. These proven liars are afraid of being
exposed by the truth, so their main focus is to silence those who tell
it. And it appears you connive with them in this.

It is hard to
escape the conclusion that you are either criminally negligent, true
hypocrites with double standards, or actually complicit in the support
of genuine nazis, attacks on free speech, and incitement to murder. If
this is not the case, please explain why my account is suspended and
these nazis continue their campaigns of threats and targeted harassment
against free speech on Twitter.

Monday, August 14, 2017

I have
recently interviewed a former member of the OSCE SMMU (Ukraine)
mission in Donbass and Ukraine. He served as an OSCE Monitor in the
field in Odessa, LNR and various other locations on both sides of the
contact line from March 2014, until his retirement from OSCE in
2017. He was a member of the US military for 30 years serving in
Special Forces for 16 years, and also previously served in Ukraine,
the Middle East, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Bosnia /Serbia areas on
programs for Border Security and Cooperative Threat Reduction US
State Department's Bureau of International Security and
Non-proliferation from 1999 to 2014. Though he currently wishes to
remain anonymous, I have personally confirmed his identity and CV. He
is for real. In this interview, I will refer to him as "KOT".RB -
Please tell us about when you came to Ukraine / Donbass, your mission
here, and how long you worked with the OSCE here.KOT -
I must preface my remarks by noting that what I say is based on my
personal observations and analyses, and does not speak for anyone
else. I agreed to this interview in view of the vast amount of
inaccuracy and distortion of what has actually happened and is going
on in Ukraine. The responsibility of what has happened there, and
also its solution ultimately lies squarely with the UA government,
and no one else.I have
spent a total of over six years in Ukraine, the last time having been
since March 2014, as one of the first members the OSCE Special
Monitoring Mission, Ukraine. I was initially assigned to the Odessa
Team. I was present and a full witness (observer) to the 2 May 2014
Odessa massacre: both on Cathedral Sq. and later at the Trade Union
Bldg.After
"Minsk-2" I was transferred to Lugansk, where I spent the
next two years on the rebel side of the "contact line",
until my recent retirement this year. RB -
Please tell us about what you witnessed in Odessa on May 2nd, 2014.KOT
- Based on my observations,
this "event" was carefully
planned and executed by the government, with a completely prepared
cover story. The “Maidan” side was far to well prepared,
equipped, rehearsed, and outfitted to come to any other conclusion.
There were a number of reports submitted on what actually happened,
but those that contradicted the official government line were
effectively suppressed along with any manner of accurate analysis of
its consequences (which certainly continues to this day). In
Odessa, traditionally a Russian speaking area, and never historically
a part of Ukraine (Khrushchev administratively assigned to the
Ukrainian SSR in 1954, by “Executive Order”), the suppression of
all opposition started in March 2014, and reached a critical point by
2 May 2014. The
government brought in a large number of western UA nationalists –
well armed, equipped, trained & rehearsed. Some of these were
also planted in the “anti-Maidan” ranks. On2
May, the anti-Maidan faction planned a
rally. Some of them had sticks and shields, anticipating possible
”nationalist” attempts to break up their rally. About 100 of them
assembled on Alexandrovsky Prospect (1100 hours) and marched to
Cathedral Sq. where they encountered a well set-up blockade of
nationalists on “Grecheskaya Str.”; the nationalists outnumbered
the anti-Maidan (AM) group by at least 5 to 1 (this was observed, but
denied by the UA government). About 100 riot police accompanied the
AM and as the nationalists advanced, tried to block them from
engaging. The nationalists had weapons, firearms, grenades, and a
huge number of stones. The AM had little to nothing – this was a
trap, and the AM’s found themselves encircled and barraged with
grenades (concussion), and a rain of stones. The AM started to answer
only by picking up what was thrown at them. In addition, they also
desperately tried to rip apart parts of the sidewalk to get something
to throw back.The
police tried to block the encirclement, in which they were also
trapped, and a number of police were serious injured and debilitated.
The police acted civilly, and with passive blocking tactics, not
using force or weapons, but they were not able to stop the onslaught,
and about six people were killed at that location. Nationalist
re-enforcements were brought in on government vehicles, including
fire trucks; most were in black uniforms. In the course of coming in,
if they thought anyone “looked suspicious” they would dismount,
chase and batter the individual, then continue to the conflict area.However,
most AM’s were able to get away – many went to the Trade Union
Building (in back of the main train station). There was another AM
rally under way there (this was their traditional meeting place and
they had set up a small tent complex catering to AM demonstration –
two days earlier, this was attacked and all tents were burned and
destroyed by the nationalists).The AM
ralliers were warned of the impending nationalist attack there, and
were “advised” to take refuge in the building. However, that too
was a trap, and the upper two floors (of 5 floors) were blocked off
by the nationalists. Once the attack started the lower floors were
subjected to “Molotov cocktails”, two snipers sere observed (by
other witnesses with military backgrounds) at the shrub line of the
park picking off AM’s near windows of the building. Many AM’s
trying to jump out of the burning building once the “cocktail”
fires ignited the interior, were beaten to death by pipe-wielding
nationalists. The official total of AM casualties was 46, but
unofficially the rumors went as high as 300 (there were also rumors
that there were bodies of AM protesters previously killed and piled
in the building basement to be burned) Note: The latter rumor was
neither observed or confirmed. The locals tried to call the fire
dept., but the Fire Brigade did not show up for several hours despite
being only 500m away.At
around 1900 hours, the nationalists set up a mass party near
Cathedral Sq. with a rock band, massive truck-mounted audio
equipment, UA flags, and held a drunken celebratory bash (observed). That
night, the area was cordoned off and only official vehicles and crews
were allowed in, removing bodies.The
wounded AM’s were taken to hospitals, which were subsequently
attacked by the nationalists throughout the night intending to
“finish” the job. Relatives locked themselves in with the wounded
to prevent nationalist access. None
of the local people questioned, said they recognized any of the
nationalists as being from Odessa. By morning the bulk of the
nationalists were gone. Only the Odessa based “Self-defense”
groups remained.The
Trade Union building forensic investigation was conducted very
superficially, with the building being “open to the public” the
next day – with hundreds of visitors – totally destroying “crime
scene” integrity.As
events unfolded, all of the UA TV stations carried a well-prepared
scenarioized reporting – all stations, the same, the same story,
clearly, fully worked out beforehand – the uniformity and nature of
reporting consistent – and not in the least resembling what was
going on or subsequently happened.The Odessa journalists
decided to conduct their own investigation – without making
accusations, but making all possible facts available for the public
record. They examined thousands of videos, interviewed hundreds of
witnesses and participants (they counted on witness candor that would
be missing in police or SBU interviews). Their findings were not
allowed to be published. The
official investigation placed the blame exclusively on the AM group.
The government brought in investigators from Kiev – the chief
investigator made the statement that this was going to be a short
investigation: one side was completely “untouchable” he said.
Charges were brought against only the AM (victim) side, as starting a
disturbance with bodily injury consequences. Most have still not gone
to trial and are still being held by the government. Those AM’s who
did go to trial were often attacked upon entry to the courthouse, and
also in the courtrooms themselves (as were witnesses perceived to be
“for” the AM’s). The police did little to stop this activity. Throughout
this, the police stated that they did not have the authority to act,
or to interfere with “Self-defense” force functionaries. These
groups were armed with firearms and conducted active para-military
recruiting and training in the city and environs. (The police
themselves were in a difficult situation, to be addressed later.)After
the main suppression of opposition at Cathedral Sq, and the Trade
Union building, all subsequent opposition activity was pursed and
eliminated: newspapers not touting the government line, TV and radio
stations, groups, etc. were forcibly closed, and often burned out. At
this time, no one with AM sentiments speaks out publicly and many
people in Odessa claim to avoid anyone who speaks Ukrainian, fearing
possible nationalist reprisals. There were a number of “Self-Defense”
groups organized in the Odessa area, who monitored and controlled any
“AM” or anti-government civil, non-violent activity.Note:
I was witness to all of this personally, including many of the
subsequent interviews, etc.There
is much more detail and a lot there. The reason I describe this, is
that the Donbass folks considered the Odessa events and their
aftermath to be a telling indication of what might happen to them,
and still do (I discussed this with some of the LNR officials).I
had considerable contact with some of the LPR officials who were
particularly interested in what had occurred (and was still
happening) in Odessa - as an important indication of what they might
expect on their territory, should UA forces be allowed into LNR.

RB
- Why didn't the OSCE make an honest report about the Odessa
Massacre?

KOT
- As you might know, OSCE is
by no means the "objective" observer it purports to be, but
is highly biased in favor of the current UA regime. You have no doubt
heard Mr Hug's many statements. They do not reflect the actual
situation; Mr Hug reflects that bias, and no one else is allowed to
make public statements, except for AMB Apakan, the Chief Monitor, as
very fine man, but responsible for the higher level of SMMU
activities.A. Hug
himself is the Only authorized person to issue public statements, the
rest of the teams are strictly forbidden to do so. He (and his
principal minion, the Head of Reporting) is the front of the org..
The "spin" they provide does not represent a balanced
position and, I feel, does not represent true observations and
reporting from the field in the correct perspective. Some
people have accused OSCE SMMU of being “agents”; this is not the
case – certainly not in any significant manner (I was one of them,
in the field and in “acting” leadership, and you can take that
for what it is worth). Perhaps there are some who are "agents",
or, say, close to it, but I do not know of any. There
are many good people in the OSCE, believe me, and many of those good
people are also frustrated by how their reporting is spun, or
sometimes ignored. I could tell you many stories of how we (Odessa
and Lugansk Monitors) fought with OSCE HQ in Kiev, in getting the
right info, the right balance, the right perspective - that
"objectivity" they tout so often.We
losteverytime;
some of our team leaders either quit, or were essentially forced out
due to this. One
time, about two years ago, I heard in the news that Russian Foreign
Minister Lavrov asked to see the "raw" data, (field
reports) and then conduct his own analyses - this of course, was not
allowed, but I was somewhat surprised that he never repeated the
demand - it would presentan
entirely different picture of what is actually observed and reported
from the field vs. what finally comes out of OSCE Kiev.You
made mention of OSCE not reporting on clear evidence of heavy weapons
impact “cratering”. OSCE Monitors send their “crater analyses”
in the daily patrol reports, including the assessment of the type of
weapon used and where it was located – patrols also report on
all explosions , both heard and observed: their direction, distance
and possible origin. That data is submitted to OSCE Kiev, but there,
again, only selected parts are actually “published” - i.e.
made public; this is a highly selective process controlled by the
likes of the head of reporting. Untoward items are not printed under
the pretext that they are not sufficiently “triangulated”
i.e. Triple-checked –which
they are, since that is one of the underlying principles in accurate
reporting–
we do not deal in speculation or conjecture, but corroborated facts
and actual observations. Even though we “triangulate prior to all
submittals, we have often been requested to do it again, and again.
This is not easy. Again, do not confuse some
good accurate field reporting, with what is screened out and does not
make it into Kiev issued reports – there is a difference, sometimes
a big one. Several Team Leaders including myself (acting) often
challenged “problematic” incomplete or inaccurate reporting, to
no avail – we never received either retractions, or corrections.
Many monitors left due to dissatisfaction with Kiev, and the futility
of dealing with them. Some time back, Kiev has instituted a careful
Team Leader “selection process”.

RB
- Can you give a specific example?

KOT -
More than one. One example was a Kiev reported 49 “Grad” systems
south of Debaltsevo – this was not in our reports – as “acting”
team leader at the time, I checked all reports, and also immediately
dispatched a patrol to corroborate – needless to say we could not
find anything of the sort in that area. When challenged, Kiev said
that it was “probably” based on satellite imagery; when I asked
that this be provided, they refused. When I asked why we were not
immediately tasked top confirm and “triangulate”, I was ignored –
the report stood – also a statement to that effect made in a high
profile TV statement by A. Hug.Another
earlier example, our detailed reporting of the 2 May 2014 events in
Odessa (of which, I was in the middle), and the follow-on activities
and events were highly redacted and often not published in Kiev
reporting – there was a great deal in those reports, but this was
never published by OSCE HQ in Kiev.

RB
- What can you tell us about the situation in areas abandoned by UAF
units during their retreats in 2014/2015, particularly about
minefields left behind?

KOT
-We reported as much as possible
on the existence and locations of mine fields: both old and new. In
the area of Biryukovo, Dolzhanskiy, Mariyevka, Zelenopolye, all the
way to Donetsk Oblast (Chervoniy Zhovten [UA for Red October]) and
Dyakovo – this is an area along the southern half of LNR.The
area is not only heavily mined (local farms in almost every village
have trucks, tractors, combines, etc. that have hit mines left by
retreating UA forces sitting in yards: some with accompanying
casualties, some luckier. De-mining
is a constant activity for the LNR forces. There were/are several UA
“combat engineering” (sapper) units in the area (primarily in
Rovenkiy). The std. TO&E for a post soviet unit (BN) is in the
range of 2000 AT mines, about 4000 AP mines and 4-6000 smaller
“booby-trap” mines. When these UA units withdrew, most of this
was not taken – they withdrew in disorder and too quickly due to
being seriously hammered by LNR forces. Many mines were emplaced in
the area, primarily in civilian farm regions, and not military
objectives. The mines were emplaced at random, indiscriminately with
no records, or markings, etc. Even civilian objects, such as barns
were said to have been “booby-trapped”.There
was a UA “combat engineering” unit based in Zelenopolye, where
LNR sappers still find and destroy ordinance and mines. The LNR
sapper units down there take casualties because of out-dated (WW II)
de-mining equipment – modern mines are tough to pick up with those
older technologies, and the sappers down there had appealed to us for
better equipment to clear (their projection) the roughly 40K mines.
OSCE could not help – in fairness this fell outside of the
legitimate Mandate (note: there were suggestions and proposals to get
some degree of reconstruction [and clearing] assistance: schools,
hospitals, and the like, but it never materialized). Honestly, I do
not know if these proposals were ever presented for discussion at the
OSCE HQ Council in Vienna.Along
with de-mining, the local farmers and sappers would occasionally
stumble across mass graves of UA soldiers.

RB
- Mass graves?

KOT -
In the Zelenopolye area, for example, the locals said they saw
several UA trucks fully laden with bodies heading into the fields
when they were withdrawing. They were able to find some of the
bodies, but not all. Mass graves were also found near Dolzhanskiy,
and also near Krasnodarskiy and Izvarino border crossings. All
bodies in those graves had been stripped by the UA to be “sterile”,
i.e., no papers, dog-tags, or any other manner of identification. The
bodies were simply dumped into a pit and buried – often this would
not be well done and some of the graves were found by dogs rummaging
about for food.We
tried to set up (in cooperation with LNR) a system of returning the
bodies but found both resistance and denial of any such bodies from
LNR territory by the Kiev authorities. Returning them for the most
part was not successful; the UA side would find many excuses to make
the process difficult or not to accept the bodies.In
all, part of the problem lay in the fact that the UA forces lost far
more people than they ever admitted to, and were faced with the
problem of embarrassing admissions. But more likely, also the
necessity to take responsibility for the casualties, and pay for
them: family care and reparations, etc. They did not seem to want to
spend the money on their fallen boys.

RB
- So the UA was not interested in recovering the bodies of their
fallen soldiers. What was their attitude towards live UA POW's
captured by LNR forces?

KOT
-In 2014/5 in Sverdlovsk, I often
spoke with an Ataman Gaidei (Aleksander Nikolayevich). He was holding
500 UA POW’s and said that it took forever to reach UA authorities
to get a return exchange going –the
UA side was simply not interested.The
exchange eventually happened afterover
six months of negotiations (OSCE was not involved in this
particular process), The UA side returnedtwentyLNR
Cossack troops in exchange (there really were not that many taken
captive), butsix of themcame
in boxes of about one cubic foot – i.e. tortured and mutilated
beyond measure. Gaidei said that he returned all of his POW’s with
“all of their fingers”, but had he seen what happened to some of
his people, he might have considered changing his approach to POW’s.Just a
brief Post-script on the Gaidei (Sverdlovsk AOR) POW exchange. The UA
side did such a poor and obviously disinterested job in moving toward
an exchange, a number of UA servicemen said, “the hell with them”,
and stayed with Gaidei and LNR as fighters.

RB
- So UA authorities were not interested in their POW's or their
fallen soldiers. What about UA soldiers wounded in the "ATO"?

KOT
- When I was still in Odessa,
prior to my transfer to Lugansk, I stopped by the Odessa Military
Hosp. to check on the wounded who were being returned from the “east”
to various hospitals around the country for long-term treatment. The
Odessa Hospital was a good one, and there were many soldiers there. I
interviewed a tank crew – all wounded to varying degrees – nice
young men, what you would expect of a decent soldier. They told me
the story of how they were treated (with a lack of concern from UA),
but more importantly, they recounted how over the three months of
treatment in Odessa, their military files kept changing, diluting
their service from combat, to rear duty, to some manner of reserve.
The boys were very sad, in relating howtheir
government wanted them to “disappear” and were manipulating their
files/records so they would not have to take care of them.One
of the soldiers needed a prosthetic lower leg – and that would take
another six months to a year to heal – the soldiers were doubtful
that this would be taken care of properly. I was
transferred to Lugansk shortly after that, and could not follow up to
see what eventually happened to the tank crew.

Monday, July 24, 2017

I woke up this morning to Sam Bright's BBC hit piece on Donbass journalists who use crowdfunding to support their work. It was not unexpected, but it was worse than I expected. "Worse" in the sense that it was even more pathetic, biased and misleading than I expected. But there are some important lessons about propaganda, freedom of speech and of the press, and how "presstitutes" like Bright, King, and the BBC have become the absolute antithesis of what they pretend to be.

Sam Bright is a freelance writer affiliated with the BBC, which is a state-run propaganda outlet controlled by the British government. Bright is also the journalistic buttboy of a pro-nazi propagandist named Alex King, who produces provably false misinformation on a Youtube channel and Twitter. Bright and the BBC have both sold any pretensions they ever had about having anything related to journalistic integrity by publishing this bogus piece whose only purpose it try to cut funding to real independent journalism in Donbass, which counters the outright lies of propagandists and bullshit artists like King, Bright and the BBC.

King, who also funds his "work" through donations, was recently perturbed by a successful crowdfunder I am doing to publish a book about my first 6 months in Donbass, as a soldier in the Novorussian Armed Forces. So he complained to Indie Go Go, the platform I am using to fund my book. They laughed him off, so he got his mindless minion followers on Twitter to start complaining to Indie Go Go that I'm a "terrorist", "child-killer", "Russian mercenary" and "in Ukraine illegally".
All bullshit, of course, and Indie Go Go wasn't buying. They laughed , the campaign continues.
Enter buttboy Bright and the BBC.

They have now published an article that has exactly nothing to do with English news, and is filled with lies from the title to pretty much every other sentence in the article. And the most important thing to consider is the motivation and timing of this tripe that they try to pass as "news".

This article by Bright and the BBC, at the behest of King, is an actual attack on freedom of speech and of the press, and an attack on the truth, by presstitutes who pretend to be journalists, but who are, in fact, propagandists and liars who are trying to suppress the truth. Because what they sell is lies...

Alex King, of London, got his start on Twitter with the "Free Savchenko" campaign. Nadiya Savchenko is a convicted murderer of two Russian journalists in Donbass, a rabid psychopath, neo-nazi, and more of a man that King and Bright are, combined. And King was demanding "Justice" for his heroine. But justice was not to be. Less than 2 years after her conviction, she was released by Russia in a prisoner exchange for Donbass P.O.W's. Two years for two murders? Ask yourself if that's justice...

King now begs his 3,000+ followers for money "to buy satellite images that "prove" the Russian Army invaded Ukraine". Never mind the facts, that the EU, Ukrainian government officials and even the ICJ in the Hague have stated openly and conclusively that NO "Russian invasion" has occurred. King still gets money from his idiot "followers" to finance his obviously false propaganda. But I think he doesn't get much. He thanked one of his credulous and imbecilic donors for sending 10 English pounds by saying "With 100, I could do more". LOL. My book fundraiser has averaged about $1,000 a week for the past 6 weeks, King is begging for the equivalent of $130. Begging.
And conniving to shut down my widespread and successful support. With help now, of the BBC.

The crowdfunder to publish my book is in no way illegal. What King and his flunkies and followers say - that I'm a "terrorist", "mercenary", "criminal", "child-killer", "paid by Moscow", these are all lies. And yet what they, and now to its eternal shame, the BBC, have done is try to shut down funding, not just for me, but for all the independent journalists who do not sell the same BS they do about the neo-nazis in Kiev and the war in Donbass.

This is a literal attack on free speech, freedom of the press, and the truth, by lying scum who call themselves "journalists", but are in reality the embodiment of the word "presstitutes". They sell lies for money, and try to cut off grassroots funding to people who are risking their lives on the ground, to report the truth. If people didn't support us and our work, they would not send us money to continue. But they do, of their own volition. And these nazis want to shut them down. Shut YOU down.

The goddamned BBC requires Brits to pay a TV license fee every year. It is mandatory. What I and other journalists here are doing is getting support from people who know we are telling the truth. Ours isoptional, yet many people do it, for thousands of dollars. Because they respect and appreciate our risk and our work. And the Truth. What the BBC, King and Bright are doing is to try to stifle the truth, and suppress freedom of speech and of the press, to prevent people who support us from being able to do so. This is The Big Lie, writ large. "Minitrue". And they (King, Bright, BBC) are doing it, not me.

The goddamned BBC gets $4.8 Billion USD per year, to publish their tripe and lies. I am trying to raise $9,000 USD to publish a book of my firsthand experiences that counter their lies. And the BBC is now working with, and for, professional liars and pro-nazi propagandists like Alex King to shut me down. There's a lesson here, for those who want to learn it.

If you support freedom of speech, freedom of the press, if you support The Truth, you can contribute to my crowdfunder to publish my book. There are 9 days left, and I'm at $5,528. 61% of my goal. The best way to stick it to professional liars like King, Bright, and the BBC is to support those who expose their lies and their campaigns to suppress Truth andfreedom of thought, speech and press.

Cowards hate the brave, fools hate the wise, and liars hate the Truth. THAT is the deal here.
It's us or them, and it's up to you to figure out which is which. And which side you're on.

Graham Phillips and Donbass Rose are journalists I trust, support and respect here in Donbass. I am ready to work with them at anytime to counteract the pro-nazi propaganda of scum like King, Bright and the BBC. King, Bright and the BBC are threatening the RIGHT of people to support our work.

Don't let this attack go unanswered. Do your part. Support the Truth and freedom of speech against those who are its enemies. Pitch in if you can.

Make a statement for Truth and freedom of thought, speech and press. Let's turn these clown's attempt to suppress freedom of the press into a lesson for them. Let's thank these professional liars for publicizing my crowdfunder. This is Journalistic Judo, let's turn their power against them.
Pitch in if you can. For the Truth. It's a rare commodity these days...