A South African television channel has fired a recruitment agency after a vacancy was advertised as a “whites-only” job.
M-Net said that it had axed the agency, Ambient Recruitment, after the recruiters allegedly subcontracted a consulting firm that posted the advert, Channel24 reported.
The vacancy notice, for a commissioning editor role at M-Net, stated that the firm was “specifically looking for a White, English speaking commissioning editor as this role is for someone who will produce soapies and programs in this specific demographic.”
The television channel sent letters of termination to Ambit Recruitment on Sunday and demanded that Kandhi Consulting—the firm that allegedly placed the advert—apologize and remove the advert from all its platforms.Newsweek has reached out to both Ambit Recruitment and Kandhi Consulting for a comment.South African President Jacob Zuma has called for a radical speeding-up of the process of black economic empowerment, including the controversial policy of expropriating white-owned land without compensation.
Neighboring Zimbabwe implemented land reform policies in 2000 that saw white-owned land seized and distributed among black citizens—many of whom were close to President Robert Mugabe—with several white farmers being killed in the process.
Western nations and international bodies like the International Monetary Fund imposing crippling sanctions on Zimbabwe, and the land reform program was widely believed to have contributed to the country’s economic crash in the late 2000s.
– Newsweek: Only White Should Apply: South Africa TV Network Fires Recruiters After Racist Job Ad Posted.

Sunday Times: From Russia with Love: How Putin had a hand in Cabinet Reshuffle: Warned Zuma about Nuclear Deal hours earlier – How Vladimir Putin helped Zuma reshuffle his cabinet

A team acting on orders from Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly met President Jacob Zuma just before his surprise cabinet reshuffle. Several ministers were removed or transferred to new departments in the reshuffle – including David Mahlobo being made the new minister of energy. According to the Sunday Times, Putin’s team told Zuma to “speed up and conclude a multibillion-dollar nuclear deal with Russia”. Hours after the meeting, the cabinet reshuffle took place. “Their visit was to deliver what many of us believe to be the final warning to the South African authorities. This group does not normally leave Russia. These are members of the military, the police, and the intelligence,” a source told the newspaper. “Mahlobo was chosen by the Russians.”
– My Broadband: How Vladimir Putin helped Zuma reshuffle his cabinet – Report.

Elon James White: 19 Oct 2017: 22:42 hrs: So we live in a world where the president is cold, heartless, tactless, and a liar but is defended no matter what he does. Holy crap.
» Retweet of BuzzFeed News: 19 Oct 2017: 21:29 hrs: Gen. Kelly defends Trump’s call to the widow of a fallen solder: “He’s a brave man, a fallen hero. He knew what he was getting himself into” pic.twitter.com/x2FrwQWKoD [Buzzfeed: Gen Kelly Knew What He Was Getting Himself Into]

Elon James White: 20 Oct 2017: 21:30 hrs: That 5 star general can go fuck himself. Military achievement doesn’t negate using power to shit on Black women.
» Retweet of Elizabeth: 20 Oct 2017: 21:27 hrs: @elonjames And now the press secretary is saying that “criticizing a 5-Star General us highly inappropriate “.

Tygae IG Factual v Interpretive Reality Caveat:

No interpretation implied in any Tygae Infographic is stated as a fact. Any interpretation implied of another persons motives could be anything from 001% upto 100% correct or incorrect. Until confirmed; they are only working hypothesis interpretations; NOT FACTS. Reminder: Factual Reality is founded upon FACTS: if overt: what happened, who said what, who did what to whom, how and when. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. Interpretive Reality is founded upon the INTERPRETATION OF FACTS: if the whom, when, how or what act is not factually unequivocal; because it is partially covert and hidden, then a combination of smaller evidentiary facts combined can enable an interpretation of 'how'; 'when'; 'who' and/or 'what'. Generally speaking when we consider 'why' the observed individual overtly or covertly did or said what and how and when; we enter into subjective interpretive reality. [Excerpt: EoP RH IQO]