What on earth do you say, when you have run out of violin superlatives?

Here in San Francisco we are fortunate to experience in fairly rapid succession the world’s great violinists, especially the young ones rising. (And sometimes the older ones falling: Pinchas Zukerman’s recent rough and scrapie visit with the Royal Philharmonic was disappointing—a soaring career tumbling for the nets). But it has generally been a feast: James Ehnes, Simone Lamsma, and now Norwegian violinist Vilde Frang, just to name a few. Given the level of excellence these days, it is sometimes hard to pick a winner and know what winning means. All are remarkably good. But I’ll go out on a limb here.

Vilde Frang, who played her Davies Hall debut last night, is simply the greatest violinist I have heard since Heifetz. It is as clear as that, and I’ll stand by these words. In the 1970s, partial to refined playing and beauty of tone, I championed Kyung Wha Chung for similar reasons: a smallish, fleet tone, light vibrato and a subtle musical approach. Wonderful as she was, the sheer ease of every note Vilde Frang plays on her 1709 “Engleman” Stradivarius surpasses anything I ever heard from Chung. I have never experienced before a violinist with such a perfectly gorgeous and even satin tone, light but rich, such intuition for getting meaning out of a breathless pianissimo, and an equivalent ability to project power when needed without the slightest sound of scrape or effort.

The Prokofiev Second Violin Concerto has its pitfalls, especially the temptation to widen vibrato in the first movement’s romantic second theme. It can “overthrob” the listener. But not here. Vilde Frang managed a slight hesitation at the beginning of the phrase which carried the deepest nostalgia soaring over a simple and effortless vibrato—as Heifetz might have—except for his being a fundamentally cold personality in a way Frang is not. And despite the passion here, Frang managed to make the entire concerto a jewel of elegant design and inspiration. In this she was admirably assisted by Yuri Temirkanov and his burnished St. Petersburg Philharmonic. They were clearly on the same page. No ugly sounds.

Indeed, though this review begins somewhat backwards, I should hasten to say that the evening was characterized by stunning refinement from all quarters. The Soviet Union did its orchestras no favors for many decades, recording them in such a brash and electrocuted manner as to make it nearly impossible for a listener to think “refined” and “Russian” in the same breath. But the St. Petersburg Philharmonic was Mravinsky’s patrician orchestra and Temirkanov, Music Director now for twenty-six years, has maintained the tradition. With a rich and dark string tone, velvety winds and western sounding brass (i.e. minus blare and vibrato), the ensemble resembles nothing so much as the Dresden Staatskapelle in its beauty of tone. St. Petersburg has a darker sound than our own SF Symphony, but despite an enormous foundation on ten double basses, remains transparent and flexible.

Indeed, I sensed throughout the evening a wonderful sense of reverence in all quarters. Clearly, the orchestra thinks of itself as an institution. And it behaved like one, coming onstage all of a piece. The only dissonance was the disturbing and anomalous resemblance of the Concertmaster to television actor Michael Landon! But Yuri Temirkanov, himself looking ambassadorial, presided more than he conducted, adjusting his glasses repeatedly with the timeless serenity of a pope. Leading without baton, Temirkanov cued when necessary from the score, with a less annoying version of Gergiev’s finger fluttering. But mostly heleaned forward with palm graciously extended, as though to hold the door for an important guest. His eyes twinkled with humor and his body language was proud but deferential. It was a bit like the President of Tiffany’s presenting a jewel case to an important customer in closed session. Pride combined with aristocratic dignity. It was all the conducting the orchestra really needed.

The evening didn’t exactly begin with dignity. There were pickets outside the hall demonstrating about Ukraine. And just before the first note of Rossini was played, a young woman draped in red white and blue stood up from just above the trombones and screamed something to Temirkanov about women. (Despite numerous female players in the orchestra, Temirkanov has gotten himself in hot water with some pre-feminist remarks. Best to utter cliches these days about the “Russian soul” than to take a stab at the female soul, say I).

That episode was handled with quick security action, snickers from the audience and ironic applause from Temirkanov, as the demonstrator was ushered out the nearest double doors. If anything, the listeners were in better humor because of it. It broke the ice for the Barber of Seville overture, which I have never heard done better, all velvet and quiet power.

When Vilde Frang came onstage, a tall and beautiful light brunette, the effect she made was subtly understated. There is a tendency to wow with a bright dress, and many a young female violinist brings gasps to the audience with her mere entrance from the wings. But Frang dazzled with an elegance to match that of the orchestra. The dress she wore was in muted tones of turquoise and rose and seemed inspired by the sort of curtains you might find in an 18th century manor house. Her appearance blended perfectly with the elegant tapestry of sound and one’s awareness of it as something precious and historical. And similarly, her behavior onstage was enjoyably reserved, when she was’t playing—a soft smile perhaps—but no narcissistic dancing, swaying or swooning. The audience went crazy, anyway, as well they should have.

I was sitting next to two concert-trotting British ladies of a certain age, as we got ready to hear the Rachmaninoff. They didn’t know the piece, so I suggested they would wonder at first where the piano was, but then be ravished by the slow movement with its romantic clarinet melody. And so it was. Temirkanov ably avoided the first movement’s sense of sameness with heartfelt rubato in the more emotional moments. And a fine clarinet player and skilled timpanist helped bring the rest of the piece alive. Except for the nostalgic moments, it was a perfectly straightforward rendition.

At the close, after addressing the crowd’s roar from all directions, Temirkanov quietly applauded the listeners. But once again, I thought, he did so in a subtly deferential way. Gennady Rozhdestvensky, in the Russian manner, would have gesticulated widely to the audience with his arms ready to embrace and swept them repeatedly towards his chest, as though raking in chips from a roulette table and asking for more! It is the sort of gesture that reminds one of Soviet bluntness—Khrushchev’s shoe banging at the United Nations…But Temirkanov did no such thing. He doesn’t trade in ego, it seems. He might as well have been Bernard Haitink.

Steven Kruger is a former classical concert agent. For a number of years he supervised the roster of conductors at Shaw Concerts in New York City, representing such artists as Sir Andrew Davis, Sir Neville Marriner, Rafael Fruhbeck De Burgos, Jose Serebrier and Robert Shaw.

Born in New York City in 1947 to a German immigrant father and an American mother, Kruger is a descendant of 19th century Bach biographer Philipp Spitta. He was educated at Phillips Exeter and Princeton, and received his degree in Philosophy, but turned to music administration after a brief career as a military officer and as a stockbroker.

Early in his exposure to music, Kruger developed a special fondness for the British Symphonists, and as a concert agent was able to play a part in the revival of such composers as Elgar, Delius, Walton, Bax and Vaughan Williams during the late 1970s.

He continues today as an advocate for these and other 19th and 20th century neo-romantic symphonic composers, such as D’Indy, Magnard, Korngold, Schmidt and Tubin, who were at one time eclipsed by the mid-century fashion for academic music. Now living in California, Steven Kruger reviews selected concerts in Davies Hall by The San Francisco Symphony and international visiting orchestras. Since 2011, he has written program notes on demand for the Oregon Symphony, including their recent CDs, “Music for a Time of War” and “This England”. He contributes a regular CD review column to New York Arts twice a month called A Crop of Recordings and is a masthead reviewer for Fanfare, America’s most serious remaining hardcover journal devoted to recorded music.

Related

Related Posts

2 Comments

William CarraganMarch 6, 2014 at 19:00

A great review. But Heifetz did not have a fundamentally cold personality; he just looked that way, and he personally resisted being characterized as cold. I heard him perform the Chaikovsky concerto at Tanglewood in 1949, and I was old enough to sense the warmth in his playing. It’s like Beethoven: looking grim as death, but full of the joy of life. After your account, I can’t wait to hear Vilde Frang!

Steven Kruger(Post author)March 6, 2014 at 20:10

So called “objective” musicians like Toscanini, Szell and Heifetz, I agree, may not have been cold personalities to those who knew them well. I am aware, for instance, that Szell resented accusations that he did not love the music he conducted. And Toscanini was full of fire and emotion–indeed to the point of abusing his players. But all three left some very straight-faced performances of music in which others found more flexibility, “pushme-pullyou” and natural nostalgic sentiment. There is nothing more fleetly elegant than Heifetz performing in the Arensky Trio. But in terms of warmth and rhapsodic intuition, other violinists may seem more forthcoming.

Support New York Arts. All donations are tax deductible through Fractured Atlas.

We can't bring you the reviews, articles, and interviews the arts deserve or our new program of interdisciplinary concerts, performances and exhibitions without your support. Please donate generously. The Arts Press (parent organization of New York Arts) is a sponsored project of Fractured Atlas, a non-profit arts service organization. Contributions for the charitable purposes of The Arts Press must be made payable to Fractured Atlas only and are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.
Please send contributions other than those made online, i.e. by check, to Michael Miller, Publisher, The Arts Press, 127 East 91st Street, New York New York, 10128. Checks should be made payable to Fractured Atlas, with The Arts Press in the memo line.

Hans Knappertsbusch was one of the most renowned Wagner conductors who ever lived. His recordings of Parsifal, especially, are near-legendary among confirmed Wagnerians. It was thus with some excitement that I opened a new 3-CD set from Orfeo, consisting of the first release ever of any performance of Lohengrin conducted by the conductor sometimes known […]

There have been dozens of capable, and more than capable, recordings of Lohengrin. Among the most-often praised are the Sawallisch/Bayreuth (1962), Kempe (1963), Solti (1985), and Abbado (1991). Recording a major Wagner opera involves heavy costs that a record company may be unable to recoup. Hence the appeal of recording a concert performance. This CD […]

I have been a fan of Kelly Galvin ever since her wonderful performance as Madame de Tourvel in Dangerous Liaisons with Shakespeare and Company, years ago. The detail alone in Ms. Galvin's performance was stunning. Even more impressive now is her direction of Kate Hennig's The Last Wife, produced by WAM Theatre in Shakespeare and Company's Bernstein Theatre. The simple set […]

The late Donizetti masterpiece, L'assedio di Calais (The Siege of Calais) is a rarity indeed, even in Europe. Four years after the first performance, l’assedio was not performed again until 1990. One hundred and eighty-one years after its premiere in 1836, this Glimmerglass production marked the American premiere. During its composition, Donizetti had struggled with […]

Wordpress themes are rather like cars. They begin to look old, then parts nobody but the admin sees start to fail. One can refurbish them and update them until they stop working together. The Berkshire Review for the Arts has had the same theme since 2009. The company that built its foundations went out of […]

A tip for our readers: How to get the most out of New York Arts and The Berkshire Review for the Arts.

What if I hate reading on computer screens, even tablets?

We get occasional inquiries from readers about whether we plan to launch a print edition of our arts journals. The answer is that we've given it some thought, and we're still thinking about it.

It is not only our older readers who object to reading them online. There are even some millennials who would rather read from paper. One of our readers got the simple idea of using the sites as sophisticated tables of contents. She prints out each article on three-hole paper and files them in a loose-leaf album. I've devoted a lot of time to finding the very best print and pdf facility there is. Just click on one of the icons at the top right of the article and print!

Click here to make your tax-deductible donation to The Arts Press, publisher of New York Arts and The Berkshire Review. Or click on the notice in the sidebar. The Arts Press is a sponsored project of Fractured Atlas, a non-profit arts service organization. Contributions for the charitable purposes of The Arts Press must be made payable to“Fractured Atlas” only and are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.