I generally disagree with most of what New York Times columnist David Brooks has to say be it his history of being an apologist for conservative misogyny to his deference to religious extremist. But on rare occasion he gets things at least partly right. A case in point is his column yesterday where he argues that the GOP is facing a Joe McCarthy moment. While he casts about for solutions to the problem, he unfortunately fails to recognize that much of what has brought the country to its current status is the failed GOP policies that he has all too often supported and the GOP obstructionism that has prevented President Obama to take more decisive action to address the nations ills. More efforts at furthering the interests of the obscenely wealthy, vulture capitalists and Christian extremists is not going to achieve the aims Brooks claims to support. Here are highlights:

Donald Trump now looks
set to be the Republican presidential nominee. So for those of us appalled by
this prospect — what are we supposed to do?

Well, not what the leaders of the Republican Party are
doing. They’re going down meekly and hoping for a quiet convention. They seem
blithely unaware that this is a Joe McCarthy moment. People will be judged by
where they stood at this time. Those who walked with Trump will be tainted
forever after for the degradation of standards and the general election
slaughter.

The better course for all of us — Republican, Democrat
and independent — is to step back and take the long view, and to begin building
for that. This election — not only the Trump phenomenon but the rise of Bernie
Sanders, also — has reminded us how much pain there is in this country.
According to aPew
Research poll, 75 percent of Trump voters say that life has gotten
worse for people like them over the last half century.

This declinism intertwines with other horrible social
statistics. Thesuicide ratehas
surged to a 30-year high — a sure sign of rampant social isolation. A record
number of Americans believe the American dream isout of reach. And for millennials,social trust isat historic lows.

Trump’s success grew out of
that pain, but he is not the right response to it. The job for the rest of us
is to figure out the right response.

I was surprised by Trump’s success because I’ve
slipped into a bad pattern, spending large chunks of my life in the bourgeois
strata — in professional circles with people with similar status and
demographics to my own. It takes an act of will to rip yourself out of that and
go where you feel least comfortable.

Up until now, America’s
story has been some version of the rags-to-riches story, the lone individual
who rises from the bottom through pluck and work. But that story isn’t working
for people anymore, especially for people who think the system is rigged.
I don’t know what the new national story will be, but
maybe it will be less individualistic and more redemptive.

We’ll probably need a new
definition of masculinity, too. There are many groups in society who have lost
an empire but not yet found a role. Men are the largest of those groups. The
traditional masculine ideal isn’t working anymore. It leads to high dropout rates,
high incarceration rates, low labor force participation rates. This is an
economy that rewards emotional connection and verbal expressiveness. Everywhere
you see men imprisoned by the old reticent, stoical ideal.

We’ll also need to rebuild the sense that we’re all in
this together.

I would add that we need a new empathy for others who don't look just like us or think just like us - something that is anathema to the Christofascists and white supremacists and vulture capitalists within the Republican Party. As for redefining masculinity, perhaps Brooks ought to spend more time around gays.

Funding to address Flint, Michigan's lead poison laced water supply is languishing in Congress, blocked by Republicans - who, in my personal view do not give a damn about the victims since most are African American. Similarly, funding to address the Zika virus menace to women and their unborn babies and other vulnerable Americans remains dead in the water thanks to Congressional GOP intransigence. But Republicans do have time to introduce and push for passage of legislation that would undercut President Obama's executive orders prohibiting anti-LGBT employment discrimination. It's behavior typical of the GOP's Obama derangement syndrome and its also typical of the GOP controlled Congress which has been the worse do knowing Congress in generations. The GOP ignores the needs of average Americans while pandering to the wealthy and religious extremists. A piece in the Washington Post looks at this new GOP effort to authorize anti-LGBT discrimination and to grant special rights to right wing Christians. Here are highlights:

The measure, introduced by freshman Rep. Steve Russell
(R-Okla.) at 12:30 a.m. as the House Armed Services Committee prepared to pass
the defense bill, would require the government to give religious
organizations it signs contracts with exemptions in federal civil rights law
and the Americans Disabilities Act.

Those laws do not ban
discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. So the
legislation would effectively override the executive order President
Obama issued in 2014 prohibiting federal contractors from such
discrimination.

The amendment provides an
exemption for “any religious corporation, religious association, religious
educational institution or religious society” contracting with the government.
It quickly prompted heated exchanges between Russell and committee Democrats,
who said it was purposefully unclear.

The measure, approved 33-29 on a mostly party-line vote
at 2 a.m., could signal that the backlash in numerous states against
LGBT anti-discrimination laws is now moving to Congress.

Stacy said that defeating the
amendment on the House floor and in the Senate is now one of Human Rights
Campaign’s top priorities. By late Thursday, a coalition of 42 civil
rights groups called the Coalition Against Religious Discrimination had sent
the committeea letter opposing the
amendment.

It “would authorize
taxpayer-funded discrimination in each and every federal contract and grant,”
the letter said of the measure. “The government should never fund
discrimination and no taxpayer should be disqualified from a job under a
federal contract or grant because he or she is the ‘wrong’ religion.”

Stacy said the language in
the amendment also would apply to organizations that receive federal grants.
“If the government says, we’re going to fund a homeless shelter, they can
refuse to hire an LGBT person to staff it even if 40 percent of the people
they’re serving are LGBT,” he said.

Democrats accused Russell of trying to mask what his
amendment would really do: Allow federal contractors to discriminate
against LGBT employees.

“The way this amendment is
written, it doesn’t matter if you are a religious organization,” said Rep.
Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the committee’s ranking member.

“You can basically be a private
contractor and this just gives you the right to discriminate if you decide you
just don’t want to do business with gay people or with anybody else for that
matter on a discriminatory basis within a protected class.”

It is far past time that all religious exemptions be eliminated. Outside of their own houses of worship and in organizations that receive no taxpayer funding whatsoever, the modern day Pharisees need to be compelled to comply with non-discrimination laws like every other citizen. The undeserved special rights need to end. As for Rep. Russell, I wonder how long it will be before we learn that he's cheating on his wife, been found in bed with a boy, has been implicated in molesting young girls, or involved in criminal corruption. Those most concerned about what goes on in other people's bedrooms are the ones you need to be worried about.

While Christian Right extremists and the Catholic Church hierarchy consistently try to depict LGBT individuals as sexual predators who lurk in restrooms and other places seeking to molest children, these claims, like so much that comes from the lips of these "godly folk" are lies. The truth is something very different, including the fact that most child molesters are heterosexual males. And in the context of the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal, having been raised Catholic and been an altar boy in the 1960's, I would argue that much of the abuse was due not to the alleged homosexuality of abusive priests, but rather the near psychotic obsession with repressive views on sex and sexuality within the Catholic clergy that created truly emotionally and psychologically disturbed individuals. The requirement of priestly celibacy only intensifies such dysfunction. Indeed, it took years of therapy for me to overcome the brainwashing I received as a child and youth growing up Catholic. A piece in Chicago Tonight looks at the true profile of sexual molesters in the context of Dennis Hastert's admitted abuse of some of his students. Here are excerpts:

Former U.S. House Speaker Dennis Hastert is going to
prison for violating federal banking laws.

But at his sentencing yesterday,
Hastert acknowledged that he sexually abused students during his time as a
wrestling coach in far west suburban Yorkville.

Hastert's high-profile disgrace has renewed
questions about the nature of sexual predators and what parents and communities
should know about them.

Char Rivetteis
the executive director of the Chicago Children's Advocacy Center, which
coordinates the efforts of child protection staff, law enforcement
professionals and medical experts in dealing with an average of more than 2,000
child sexual abuse reports each year.

“In general, a common profile is
that the perpetrators are known to these children. Over 90 percent of children
who are sexually abused are abused by someone they know,” Rivette said. “It’s
not rape by a stranger, it’s generally someone who has developed a relationship
with this child, and usually their parents also, and who creates scenarios and
contexts within which they can successfully groom and find situations where
they can act out against these children.”

According to Rivette, Hastert
might not fit the description of an outright psychopath or pedophile. But his
apparent state of denial at Wednesday’s sentencing is common for an abuser.

“Obviously Hastert was a coach, a
teacher, a citizen of the community and he had to know that deep-down what he
was doing was wrong and harmful and inappropriate,” she said. “Yet he was still
compelled to do these things, so he must have come up with rationalizations to
just kind of get him through this and allow him to do this without the guilt,
without the shame, without the understanding that what he was doing was harming
these children.”

When it comes to the survivors,
Rivette said, it’s also common for them to not speak out and to feel shame or
guilt.

“If you are able to disclose and someone believes you,
it’s a big key to actually getting trauma treatment and actually moving on. If
you don’t, what I see is a lot of emotional struggles throughout life, a lot of
inability to form healthy relationships as an older adult, really a lot of
struggles with substance abuse,” she said.

But Rivette said the good news is
that we’re getting better at addressing these issues in the wake of the
Catholic Church sex abuse scandal and now Dennis Hastert.

To stop sexual abuse of children, the first step is knowing who the predators are and not falling prey to animus based lies or psychotic sexual dogma. It is also important to recognize that all too often the real predators are the very ones seeking to demonize and stigmatize others. I don't think it is a coincidence that sexual abuse by conservative Christian clergy is common despite all of their rantings against sex and sexuality. The more they condemn something, the more likely they are to be the ones engaging in it or fantasizing about it.

A bill that would ban so-called conversion therapy nationwide has been introduced into the U.S. Senate. Get ready for a lot of bleating by and sheets of flying spittle from Christofascists who believe that their "religious freedom" includes the right to subject their LGBT children to psychological - and sometimes physical - abuse in the form of "ex-gay" conversion therapy. Flocking to their banner will be countless Republicans, especially in the House of Representatives only too happy to shamelessly prostitute themselves to the anti-science, anti-knowledge knuckle draggers. These individuals are only too happy to sacrifice the lives of LGBT youth for their own short term political gain. A piece in The Advocate looks at the bill's introduction. Here are article highlights:

A
companion bill to the House's Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act — an effort
to ban LGBT "conversion therapy" introduced
last yearby
California congressman Ted Lieu — was introduced in the Senate on
Thursday.

Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Patty Murray, of
New Jersey and Washington State, respectively, are behind the Senate's version
of the Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act. If passed into law, the bill would
consider all efforts to change someone's sexual orientation or gender identity
an "unfair or deceptive act or practice" under the Federal Trade
Commission Act. Such efforts, sometimes called "reparative" or
"ex-gay" therapy, have been denounced as ineffective and harmful by
every major medical and mental health organization in the United States.

Considering
so-called reparative therapy a form of "medical malpractice," the FTC
would be tasked with monitoring and ending such practices nationwide. The
bill's House version would allow private citizens to file federal lawsuits
against any practitioners engaging in "conversion therapy" and
charging money for their services.

The federal effort to ban "ex-gay" services follows
in the wake of several states making the practice illegal, includingNew Jersey,Oregon,Illinois,Washington, D.C., andCalifornia. The Therapeutic
Fraud Prevention Act would go further than the bans in these states by banning
the practice in its entirety, where the statewide bans only prohibit licensed
therapists from using the debunked practice on minors.

The
damaging effects of so-called conversion therapy garnered national attention in
2014, when the suicide note of 17-year-old Ohio trans girl,Leelah Alcorn, went viral, detailing
the harm she suffered under the “Christian” therapist she was sent to by her
parents to “cure” her of being transgender. A petition on the government’s We
the People platform calling for a nationwide ban, to be called“Leelah’s Law,” garnered more than
100,000 signatures, prompting a response from the White House where
the administration expressed its “concern” over
the use of the discredited treatment. Shortly thereafter, theU.S. Surgeon General issued a public
statement condemning the practice.

This February, a coalition of LGBT groupsfiled a groundbreaking federal complaint
with the FTC, alleging that practictioners of so-called conversion
therapy were guilty of fraud.

I and others have repeatedly said that the rise of Donald Trump is something that was created by the so-called Republican establishment which for decades now, especially over the last 15+ years, has used calls to racism, homophobia and other forms of hatred to dupe voters into voting for a party's whose agenda is diametrically opposed the the economic interests of those voters. Moreover, in order to win short term electoral victories, every kind of right wing extremist - nasty, ignorance embracing people my Republican grand parents would never have affiliated with - were welcomed with open arms into the GOP. Now, the so-called establishment has lost control of the monster that it nurtured and unleashed on the nation. A column in the New York Times looks at the phenomenon and contrasts it with the Democrat experience. Here are excerpts:

Both parties make
promises to their bases. But while the Democratic establishment more or less
tries to make good on those promises, the Republican establishment has
essentially been playing bait-and-switch for decades. And voters finally
rebelled against the con.

First, about the Democrats:
Their party defines itself as the protector of the poor and the middle class,
and especially of nonwhite voters. Does it fall short of fulfilling this
mission much of the time? Are its leaders sometimes too close to big-money
donors? Of course. Still, if you look at the record of the Obama years, you see
real action on behalf of the party’s goals.

Above all, you have the Affordable Care Act, which has
given about 20 million Americans health insurance, with thegains biggestfor the poor, minorities and low-wage
workers. That’s what you call delivering for the base — and it’s surely one
reason nonwhite voters have overwhelmingly favored Mrs. Clinton over a
challenger who sometimes seemed to dismiss that achievement.

Maybe you think Democrats
could and should have done more, but what the party establishment says and what
it does are at least roughly aligned.

Things are very different among Republicans. Their party
has historically won elections by appealing to racial enmity and cultural
anxiety, but its actual policy agenda is dedicated to serving the interests of
the 1 percent, above all through tax cuts for the rich — whicheven Republican votersdon’t support, while they truly loathe
elite ideas like privatizing Social Security and Medicare.

What Donald Trump has been doing is telling the base that
it can order à la carte. He has, in effect, been telling aggrieved white men
that they can feed their anger without being forced to swallow supply-side
economics, too.

Yes, his actual policy proposals still involve huge tax cuts
for the rich, but his supporters don’t know that — and it’s possible that he
doesn’t, either. Details aren’t his thing.

Establishment Republicans have tried to counter his
appeal by shouting, with growing hysteria, that he isn’t a true conservative.
And they’re right, at least as they define conservatism. But their own voters
don’t care.

If there’s a puzzle here, it’s why this didn’t happen
sooner. One possible explanation is the decadence of the G.O.P. establishment,
which has become ingrown and lost touch. Apparatchiks who have spent their
whole careers inside the bubble of right-wing think tanks and partisan media
may suffer from the delusion that their ideology is actually popular with real
people. And this has left them hapless in the face of a Trumpian challenge.

Probably more important,
however, is the collision between demography and Obama derangement. The elite
knows that the party must broaden its appeal as the electorate grows more
diverse — in fact, that was the conclusion of the G.O.P.’s2013 post-mortem.
But the base, its hostility
amped up to 11 after seven years of an African-American president (who the
establishment has done its best to demonize) is having none of it.

The point, in any case,
is that the divergent nomination outcomes of 2016 aren’t an accident. The
Democratic establishment has won because it has, however imperfectly, tried to
serve its supporters. The Republican establishment has been routed because it
has been playing a con game on its supporters all along, and they’ve finally
had enough.

And yes, Mr. Trump is playing a con game of his own, and
they’ll eventually figure that out, too. But it won’t happen right away, and in
any case it won’t help the party establishment.

Even as North Carolina continues to be slammed economically for the passage of North Carolina GOP backed HB2, Alabama Republicans, most notably Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, refuse to acknowledge that it is their own bigoted, backward, ignorance embracing beliefs that are the root cause for their current legal woes. Indeed, Alabama has regressed and become far more backward politically than it was when I lived there in the late 1970's and early 1980's. Once again, the catalyst for the descent into lunacy has been the rise of Christofascist in the Republican Party. A piece in The New Civil Rights Movement looks at the whining of Judge Moore - who in my view belongs in a mental institution - and his equally deranged lawyer, Mat Staver. Here are highlights:

On WednesdayLiberty Counselfounder and CEOMat Staverstood before the cameras and droned on
in support of his client, Alabama Chief JusticeRoy Moore. Moore
is under attack by the Southern Poverty Law Center and others for his
actions surrounding the Supreme Court's marriage decision and his instructions
to Alabama magistrates to not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The
SPLC filed a complaint.

Staver, and later at the podium,
Moore claimed the complaint was "politically motivated." At stake:
whether or not the complaint leads to official ethics charges by
the Judicial Inquiry Commission of Alabama.

But it was their other language
and attacks that were especially revealing and offensive.

Staver referred to one of the
people who filed the complaint against Moore as an
"admitted transvestite."

Moore slammed his
critics as "atheists, homosexuals and transgender
individuals." At one point he referred to a trans woman as
"her," but "corrected" himself, calling her,
"him."

At another point, Mooresaid “transsexualism is a known mental
illness,” or was, until 2013, and suggested it still should be classified
as such.

“We’re in a serious time in our
country," Moore told the few reporters who attended his press conference.
"We are at a time in our country when people who just a few years ago
would have been ascribed a mental illness, a mental disorder.

Moore claims that despite publishing an order directing
Alabama magistrates to not issue marriage licenses to same-sex
couples, “There is nothing in writing that you will find that I told
anybody to disobey a federal court order. That’s not what I said.”

That will be for Judicial
Inquiry Commission of Alabama to decide.

What I find ironic is is the fact that in many ways Alabama was more moderate when George Wallace (who I had the opportunity to meet) was governor than it is now under all the "godly" Republicans. If you want proof that Christofascists are a threat to good government, look no farther than Alabama and North Carolina.

As Virginia's population becomes more urban - with urban areas being much more liberal than the hinterland regions - the Republican Party of Virginia has done all it can to block the restoration of voting rights for felons who have done their time and paid their fines. In the vast majority of states the restoration of voting rights happens automatically. Not so in Virginia. Why? Because convicted felons in Virginia are disproportionately members of racial minorities - minorities that tend to vote liberal/Democrat. Indeed, Virginia Republicans even opposed former Governor Bob McDonnell's effort to restore voting rights - one of McDonnell's few progressive acts - because even a small increase in minority voters might tip some districts from the GOP column to that of Democrats. This GOP concern is heighten by the reality that the population of the urban cities and counties of Northern Virginia, greater Richmond, and Hampton Roads now exceeds that of the rest of Virginia combined. It was no surprise, therefore, that the Virginia GOP went ballistic over Governor McAuliffe's executive order that restore voting rights to thousands and thousands of former felons, many of who are now productive members of society and good citizens. As the Virginian Pilot reports, Congressman Bobby Scott - who is my representative and who the husband and I know - blasted the bigotry of Virginia Republicans. Here are story excerpts:

U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott struck hard Wednesday at
Republicans who accused Gov. Terry McAuliffe of trying to help the Democrats
win the presidency when he issued an executive order last week restoring voting
and other civil rights to 206,000 felons.

State Republican leaders have
said McAuliffe’s executive order last week that allows felons who have served
their sentences and probation to vote, run for office or serve on juries was a
way to register more voters for Democrat Hillary Clinton in the November
presidential election. They also objected to his restoring rights to those who
committed violent crimes.

Scott, an attorney and civil
liberties expert, argues the governor is correcting a suppression effort that
goes back 115 years.

“The right to vote is a right.
It’s not a privilege. You have Republicans who at every opportunity are trying
to deny people the right to vote,” he said in a conference call with reporters.

He noted Virginia’s ban on felons
voting originated in the early 1900s as part of a package of new state laws
designed to suppress blacks. Those restrictions, including the now-banned
literacy tests and poll taxes, at the time had forced the removal of 85 percent
of black voters from the rolls.

McAuliffe’s order could return to
the voting rolls as much as 20 percent of the state’s black population that
have felony convictions, Scott said.

“If there is such an advantage to
Democrats, it means the Republicans were enjoying a huge advantage all these
years because they could deny 20 percent of the African American population the
right to vote,” the Newport News Democrat said.

Virginia remains one of four
states that strip voting rights from felons for life after their convictions.
Before McAuliffe’s action, felons could get the right restored only by
individually applying to the governor. Governors, both Republicans and
Democrats, have restored rights to thousands in recent decades.

The mindset behind Massive Resistance in the 1960's is a live and well in some factions in Virginia, especially the Republican Party of Virginia which has become increasingly racists and homophobic since I resigned from the party many years ago. I should note, however, that the growing racism and religious extremism directly corresponds with the rise of the Christofascists in the Virginia GOP.

GOP demagogue in chief, Donald Trump, gave a "major foreign policy speech" today and, given Trump's batshitery to date, many are describing Trump's positions as "nonsense." Lord knows what some allies of America must be saying. A piece in Salon looks at Trump's purported positions and how they track the views of his knuckle dragging supporters. Here are excerpts:

Donald Trump today completed one of the presidential
rites of passage – he gave The Big Foreign Policy
Speech. Because he’s Trump, expectations were set abysmally low and,
because he’s Trump, he still failed to clear them. The speech was notably
un-Trumplike in that it was pre-prepared and delivered with the assistance of a
teleprompter, but it also somehow managed to retain the incoherence and
inconsistency that are the hallmarks of Trumpian discourse.

The whole thing was
plagued with internal contradictions. One of his key points was the idea that
America’s allies “are beginning to think they can’t depend on us,” and his
primary piece of evidence was the nuclear agreement with Iran and our
unwillingness to walk away from it. Had we actually walked away from the Iran
deal, we’d havealienated all the
critical allies who helped us negotiate it, which might lead them to
believe they can’t depend on us. And, just a few moments after endorsing the
retroactive abandonment of multilateral Iran negotiations, Trump said our “friends
need to know that you will stick by the agreements that you have with them.” He
claimed to have a plan for defeating the Islamic State, but refused to divulge
it because “we must as, a nation, be more unpredictable.” Shortly thereafter he
said the “best way” to achieve our foreign policy goals “is through a
disciplined, deliberate and consistent foreign policy.”

For these reasons
and because hemispronounced the names
of a couple of countries, Trump was resoundingly mocked, especially
byconservativesand Republicanswho still can’t come to grips with the
fact that Trump will, in all likelihood, be their presidential nominee. But
here’s the fun little secret about Trump’s speech – in most respects it wasn’t
that different from the nonsense the “acceptable” Republican presidential
candidates served up.

His speech was
peppered with criticisms that America has become weak, our military is falling
apart, our international alliances are breaking down, and our enemies no longer
cower in fear of us. You’ll find the same exact themes in the foreign policy
speeches of Marco Rubio, seen by many inside the GOP as a foreign policy
wunderkind, whotalks aboutthe “deterioration of our physical and
ideological strength” that “has led to a world far more dangerous than when
President Obama entered office.”

The running theme of Trump’s speech is that there’s
nothing wrong with American foreign policy that can’t be fixed with a little
toughness and “strength.” How will Trump best China? With “strength.” How will
he get the better of Russia? Yet more “strength.” This is a standard-issue
Republican position – Rubio andJeb
Bushand pretty much
every other Republican presidential contender reduced their foreign policies
down to a question of showing greater “strength” than Barack Obama, usually by
telegraphing their eagerness to use more military force than the president has
been willing to. Trump also endorsed thenow well-worn criticismthat Obama refuses to use the magic
words “radical Islam.”

Keep all this in
mind when you see Republicans or even mainstream reporters complaining that
Trump’s speech shows that he is “unserious” about foreign policy or put forth a
foreign policy vision that doesn’t make sense. They’re attacking Trump because
he’s Trump and he’s an obvious dolt, but they’re deliberately sidestepping the
fact that much of what Trump said reflects in the incoherence and unreality of
“respectable” Republican politicians when it comes to foreign affairs.

With the math more or less insurmountably against him, Bernie Sander's campaign is struggling to go on after yesterdays drubbing in four out of five states. Indeed, there are reports that he is cutting staff as he tries to find a path forward. So where does that leave Sanders and his supporters? A piece in te New York Times makes the case that Sanders has set a large part of the agenda for Democrat party going forward. Sanders may have lost the nomination fight, but his ideas and the issues he championed will likely live on. Here are column highlights:

At this point, Bernie
Sanders is the figurehead of a living idea and a zombie campaign.
The issues his campaign has raised are likely to resonate
with the progressive left for decades, if not forever, but his path to becoming
the Democratic nominee is now narrower than a cat’s hair.

It’s over. He knows it and we know it. TheNew York Times reportedon Wednesday that Sanders “is planning
to lay off ‘hundreds’ of campaign staffers across the country and focus much of
his remaining effort on winning California.”

And yet he continues to carry the
torch and keep the flame alive so that his supporters — or more appropriately,
the supporters of the causes he has advanced — have an opportunity to cast
protest votes in the few remaining contests.
He has gone from leading a revolution to leading a wake.

I think people have mischaracterized the choice being
made between Sanders and Clinton. It is not necessarily a clean choice between
idealism and pragmatism, between principle and politics, between dynamism and
incrementalism — though all those things are at play to some degree.
But to me, it is more about where we peg the horizon and
how we get from here to there.

The ideals are not in dispute. What’s in dispute
is whether our ideals can be reasonably accomplished by a single administration
or a generation.
Sometimes you have to cut deals to reach ideals. That’s politics.

Now, you could argue that our politics are broken, as
Sanders has, and you would be right. Moneyed interests — that of industries and
individuals — have far too much influence. Our two-party system is heavily
skewed to favor establishment candidates, although Sanders’s success and Donald
Trump’s offer strong evidence that the party apparatuses are not inviolable.

What requires less debate is the often-repeated refrain
that Sanders’s supporters are the future of the Democratic Party. In state
after state, often whether he won it or not, he carried youth vote by wide
margins.
[

P]art of it is what
Harry Enten pointed out on Friday:
The Democratic electorate turning out in 2016 has been a lot more liberal than it
was in the last competitive Democratic primary, in 2008.”

Enten explained:

It wouldn’t be surprising to see the moderate/conservative portion of the Democratic
primary electorate become a minority in the next 10 years. It’s the youngest
Democrats who are more to identify as
“very liberal.” It could very well be that someone matching Sanders’s
ideological outlook will be more successful down the road.

First we have to see what comes of the general election,
in a contest that at this point seems to pit Clinton against Trump. Although
current polling shows Clinton with an overwhelming edge, making political
predictions seven months in advance is a fool’s errand.

[W]hile current polling favors Clinton, history does not.The last time a Democratic president
succeeded a multi-term Democratic president was when Harry Truman succeeded
Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1945.

However the election breaks in November, the Sanders
coalition — largely young, liberal and white — will not likely be satisfied.
Either Clinton will win, and it will simply feel like a lesser of two evils, a
subsuming of a righteous cause into a waffling contrivance; or Clinton will
lose, and the Sanders coalition will feel vindicated that the wrong Democratic
candidate won the nomination.

Either way, the cause lives.
Universal health care becomes no less attractive. Neither does free public college, or campaign finance reform, or a more pacifist foreign
policy.

The Democratic Party, for better or worse, is likely to move further toward progressive purity in
Sanders’s wake. This may backfire, and encourage a nominating process that
pushes otherwise moderate and widely attractive candidates to adopt increasingly
extreme policies that make them nearly un-electable, as has happened with the
Republican Party.

That, to me, seems to be at least part of the Democratic
Party’s future. Whether that is a utopian or dystopian future, only time will
tell, but the reckoning is coming. This, I believe, will be a fixture of the
Sanders legacy: Drag a center-left party further left — whether one calls that
True Left or Extreme Left.

This week is the 83rd year of Virginia's Historic Garden Week which is put on by garden clubs across the state that utilize the proceeds to restore and maintain historic gardens across the Commonwealth. Today was Hampton's day to shine as homes and gardens in historic Ft. Monroe - now a National Landmark - were open for public tours (provided one bought a ticket) for the first time ever. For the husband and I, the event is an annual ritual during which we typical host a number of the husband's clients and we get to see a who's who of Hampton/Newport News society and business leaders. While very traditional in many ways, both cities are surprisingly gay friendly, and with the husband being the hair stylist/salon owner of choice for many, we are always warmly received. Indeed, it is a great marketing/networking event. And the homes - many dated from the 19th century and turn of the 20th century on so-called General's Row were amazing to say the least (the commanding general's residence with its view across Chesapeake Bay is pictured above). Among those doing the tours were both garden club devotees and former military service members who came back to see how the general officers had lived in stately splendor. Here are highlights from the Daily Press:

"We know visitors will enjoy looking at
the beautiful flower arrangements in the five houses on tour. We hope they will
visit The Casemate Museum, Chapel of the Centurion and Old Point Comfort
Lighthouse, as well.

"And, The Marketplace, in the
former Arsenal Building, will offer artwork, garden accessories, home décor,
jewelry and clothing for sale."

As you walk
along Fort Monroe's sidewalks, or stand inside the bayside bandstand, you can
just imagine yourself living the life that so many military personnel enjoyed
during their assignments at the scenic fort. Now that the property is no longer
a major military command, the site is taking on its own brand of community for
the families who occupy residences where generals and colonels once lived [one can lease homes and other housing options] .

"Additionally, everything is walkable at
Fort Monroe. Residences are close to beaches, office spaces for work,
restaurants, Hampton Community Center, YMCA fitness building, marina, soccer
and ball fields, churches and the opportunity to walk the top of the fortress.
Additionally, the retail portion of Phoebus is just over the bridge and also is
in easy walking distance."

Historic Garden Week in Virginia, April
23-30, features 250 private homes and gardens open for public tours statewide.
Sponsored by the Garden Club of Virginia — gcvirginia.org — since 1929, the
annual event raises funds for the restoration and preservation of public
gardens at historic sites, including Monticello, Mount Vernon and Montpelier.

The garden club
estimates the cumulative economic impact of the country's only statewide home
and garden tour for the past 45 years is $425 million, according to a news
release. The event attracts 30,000 visitors, and includes local residents and
out-of-state tourists.

Below are a few more photos - and yes, I did pick up a couple new clients while enjoying the event. After the festivities, our group decamped to the Hampton Yacht Club for Cosmos and dinner.

As noted recently, Republicans at both the state and federal level have sought tom demonize transgender individuals as would be sexual predators seeking to molest women and young girls in restroom facilities even as they have appealed to a federal judge to be lenient on admitted sexual molester Dennis Hastert, former GOP Speaker of the House - a man who was once second in line for the presidency in the event of the death or incapacity of the president and vice president of the United States. Thankfully, the judge ignored these hypocrisy filled calls for leniency and Hastert was sentenced to 1 5 months in prison. In truth, he should have been sentenced to at least a five year prison term, especially since he admitted to his sexual molestation of one of his students. Here are highlights from The New Civil Rights Movement:

Dennis Hasterthas just been sentenced in a hush
money case involving his past sexual molestation of teenaged boys while he was
a wrestling coach decades ago. A federal judge, calling the former Republican
Speaker of the House a "serial child molester," sentenced him
to two years of supervised release and 15 months jail time – not for his
actions of sexual abuse, but for evading bank reporting requirements and making
false statements to federal authorities.

In sentencing Hastert, Judge Thomas M. Durkin of the
Northern District of Illinois also said the former Speaker should participate
in a sex offender treatment program, CNNreports.

"I'm
deeply ashamed to be standing before you here today," Hastert said in court
during his sentencing. "I know I'm here because I mistreated some of my
athletes as a coach."

The court received dozens of letters of support from former [GOP] colleagues of Hastert, including one from Tom Delay, the former Senate Majority
Leader who is now an anti-gay Christian activist.

"He is a good man that loves the Lord," DeLay wrote
to the judge. "He gets his integrity and values from Him. He doesn't
deserve what he is going through. I ask that you consider the man that is
before you and give him leniency where you can."

Right Wing Watchreportsthat
"days after the Supreme Court delivered its landmark marriage equality
decision, DeLay claimed that he knew of 'a secret memo coming out of the
Justice Department' that would legalize '12 new perversions,' including 'having
sexual with little boys.'"

Sadly, I suspect that Hastert is but the tip of the ice berg when it comes to anti-LGBT Republicans who are either serial adulterers, seeking gay sex "on the down low" ore sexually molesting minors. Hypocrisy and disingenuous lies are now a hallmark of today's GOP.

I nearly did a post based on a spoof in Patheos that pretended that Iceland had declared Christianity to be a public health hazard. Sadly, while I believe the premise of the spoof piece to be true, the scope is too limited. It should apply to all religion, or certainly the conservative variety. As a piece in The Daily Beast reports, in Bangladesh, Islamic fundamentalists are on a killing spree murdering free thinkers, the educated and, naturally those who are LGBT and/or support LGBT rights. Anyone who threatens compliance with their interpretation of the ravings of a man who would nowadays likely be declared to be mentally ill and certainly not be revered. Modern knowledge and intellect are the enemies of not just American Christofascists, but their similarly hate and fear filled cousins who cling to Islam and prefer a revival of a Medieval mindset rather than let go of the myths they cling to. Here are article highlights:

There really is no other way to put this. Free thinkers in
Bangladesh are being serially hacked to death in their homes. An infamous hit
list appeared in 2013 naming 84 “atheist bloggers.” By the end of 2015 there
had beenseven such murder sacross
the country, and, tragically, this past week alone claimed three more victims.

Rezaul Karim Siddique, a professor of English at Rajshahi
University in the country’s northwest, was set upon outside his house as he
left for work. Siddique founded a literary magazine calledKamolgandharand wanted to start a music school in
his village as a way to involve his students in extra-curricular activities.
But instead he died where he fell, succumbing to severe wounds after he was
hacked in the back of the neck by cowards on a passing motorbike.

Only two days later, U.S. embassy employee Xulhaz Mannan,
who was one of Bangladesh’s top gay-rights activists and editor of the
country’sonly LGBT magazine,Roopbaan, was
murdered by machete in his home. His friend, another gay rights activist Tanay
Mojumdar was also killed. Xulhaz and Tanay were behind the annual “Rainbow
Rally,” held April 14 on the Bengali New Year.

The so-called “Islamic State in Bangladesh” hasclaimed
responsibilityfor the killing of Professor Siddique. Its media mouthpiece,
calledAmaq, stated ISIS
fighters “assassinated a university professor for calling to atheism in the
city of Rajshahi in Bangladesh.”

And despite the Bangladeshi government’s rejection of
this claim, ISIS English-language magazineDabiqcarried an interview earlier this
month with their purported leader in Bangladesh, Abu Ibrahim al-Hanif, whoclaimedthat the country had become its
base of operations in South Asia.

Whether or not ISIS was behind this attack is secondary.
The effect is the same. Jihadist terrorists are systematically hunting down
leading free thinkers in Bangladesh—one by one—and hacking them to death.

It is “open season” on atheists in Bangladesh.

And though Professor Siddique’s daughter, Rizwana Hasin,
hassaidthat her father was not in fact an
atheist, among jihadists that definition is incredibly broad.

Anyone who advocates liberal secularism, free inquiry,
arts and culture, is considered an “atheist” or “apostate.” Anyone who
“supports” or “sides” with atheists, supports freedom ofreligion as well asfromreligion, and anyone who maintains the
primacy of free speech, including and especially the human right to
“blaspheme,” is deemed an atheist, whether they declare themselves to be or
not.

So beleaguered is this minority that you can be put to
death for atheism in no less than 13 countries around
the world. In 39 countries the law mandates a prison sentence for blasphemy,
and six of these are Western countries.

Saudi Arabia [America's false ally] has evendeclaredbeing an atheist a terrorist offense.
Nobel Prize Nominee and Amnesty International Prisoner of ConscienceRaif Badawistill languishes in jail there
“accused” of atheism.

Meanwhile Bangladesh’s best-known blogger, Imran
Sarker—who led major secular protests in Dhaka against Islamist leaders in 2013—saidthat he had received a death threat on
Sundayfrom a U.K. numbersaying he would be killed “very soon.”

By visibly killing off dissenters in such a public way,
extremists seek to scare us all into silence. The targeting starts with
atheists and “blasphemers,” but almost always moves on to the sexually diverse,
liberals, secularists, and minority sects—Muslim or otherwise—that rely on such
pluralism to flourish.

The killers’ aim is to elicit our fearful compliance,
like Charb’s super-surveillance camera. Those who murder in the name of the
Master of the Universe lay claim to what came before life, what comes during
life and what is to come after life.

No totalitarianism can be more total than that claimed in God’s
name. This is why no resistance is more urgent than that waged to protect the
right to our own individual conscience. For ISIS, we are all atheists.

Make no mistake, there are right wing Christians who would be only to happy to engage in similar bloodshed - e.g., "preachers" who call for the execution of gays. Moreover, if one knows history, Christianity has left a huge trail of blood of those murdered for being "heretics" or non-believer. Religion is a curse on mankind.

Republicans have been taking demagoguery to new levels for some time, be it through dog whistle racism, the current attacks on transgender Americans, and of course through fanning the flames of Christofascists seething homophobia. Then there is, of course, all of the GOP demagoguery surrounding climate change - or should I say, the GOP claims that it doesn't exist. But despite all of these appeals to hate and ignorance, Donald Trump has out done other Republicans when it comes to appealing to the ignorant and bigoted. Kathleen Parker has once again fled the GOP reservation - or what has become the know nothing reservation of the GOP base. In a column in the Washington Post she looks to the classical philosophers of Greece's golden age to illustrate that Trump is a demagogue to be feared and one who would be loathed by the Founding Fathers. Here are excerpts:

Plato, who was Aristotle’s mentor, thought otherwise —
that rhetoric, or the art of persuasion, in the wrong hands was dangerous and
likely to be abused to appeal to people’s base motives. He foresaw the
unethical, dishonest uses that a skilled but immoral speaker could put his
persuasive powers to, with credulous people eager to believe or buy whatever he
was selling.

Which brings us unavoidably to
Donald Trump, as if you hadn’t guessed.

We at least owe Trump thanks for bringing these two
ancient philosophers out of history’s woodwork and back into the conversation.
Trump also has inspired reconsideration of rhetoric’s rightful place in the
classroom, where it was once considered an essential component of “a
gentleman’s” education.

One such
classroom can be found at the University of Virginia School of Law, where I was
recently a guest lecturer. What better time to be reviewing rhetoric’s ancient
rules and modern applications than during a presidential election that features
one of the most blazing examples of unsavory rhetoric . . . .

So, the question for today’s class: Is Trump the huckster
that Plato predicted would someday organize an angry mob into a proud army of
anti-intellectual patriots inoculated to facts and reason?

Why, yes! But don’t take my word for it. Consider instead
the appraisal of U-Va. law professor Robert Sayler, who has co-written a book
with Molly Bishop Shadel, “Tongue-Tied America,” as a template for
would-be high school rhetoric teachers. Using Aristotle’s aforementioned
framework, Sayler divined the Greek philosopher’s answer to the question:
“Trump’s buffoonery and unhinged chatter reduces to utter catastrophe.”Let us count the ways.

First, in the matter of ethos, or
earning the trust of one’s audience, Trump is as big a prevaricator as he
accuses “Lyin’ Ted” Cruz of being.PolitiFact gave Trump its2015 award for the most fibs. In distrust do
us part.

Second is pathos, which Sayler
defines as the sparing appeal to emotions. For The Donald, another “F.” Says
Sayler: “Trump routinely rages, flush-faced, anger-spewing, sputtering, especially
when challenged.” Hehas spoken of people leaving his rallies “on
stretchers” or deserving a “punch . . . in the face,” while promising to pay
assailants’ legal fees.

Third and last, Trump also flunks logos. Channeling
Aristotle, Sayler opines that Trump’s logic, common sense and factual
argumentation are “a minefield of chaos.” Rather than advance positive
proposals, Trump spends most of his time railing against what he opposes: the
Geneva Conventions, NATO, world trade, the United Nations, the president,
“experts” and, of course, “the establishment.”

Otherwise, he
operates in a substance-free zone of narcissistic fantasy. “They love me,” he
insists. “I could standin
the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters.”
. . . . Trump, concludes the professor, is a world-class demagogue and
blunderbuss.

It is also highly unlikely that Trump supporters give a
hoot. Plato, Aristotle and Sayler are all elitists, aren’t they? But what
should be plain to everyone else is that the study of rhetoric is essential to
an educated populace, lest rising generations fall prey to future demagogues
and the perilous fates that await the unwitting.

One must not forget that Trump is the creation of the GOP establishment that he now threatens to destroy. Conscious decisions were made to elect Christofascists and white supremacists onto local county and city committees and to allow the infiltration of the base by the ignorant. There's a reason so many Americans no call themselves "independents" - any thinking, moral person found the GOP to be hostile territory and felt compelled to flee the insanity. Trump and his followers who embrace ignorance and bigotry must be defeated as must the GOP in its current incarnation.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.