Development of a Vision-Based Particle Tracking Velocimetry Method and Post-Processing of Scattered Velocity Data

dc.contributor.advisor

Dabiri, Dana

en_US

dc.contributor.author

Paul, Micah Philip

en_US

dc.date.accessioned

2012-08-10T20:35:53Z

dc.date.available

2012-08-10T20:35:53Z

dc.date.issued

2012-08-10

dc.date.submitted

2012

en_US

dc.identifier.other

Paul_washington_0250O_10176.pdf

en_US

dc.identifier.uri

http://hdl.handle.net/1773/20280

dc.description

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2012

en_US

dc.description.abstract

In this thesis, a new vision-based hybrid particle tracking velocimetry (VB-PTV) technique is described and methods of processing randomly scattered velocity data investigated. The VB-PTV technique uses a feature matching method from computer vision theory which relies on the principles of proximity, similarity, and exclusion, meaning that it seeks to match one feature to one feature in subsequent images, and it favors matches which are close to one another and "look" similar. By constructing a matrix which takes these principles into account and performing singular value decomposition, a straightforward method of matching is developed which can give accurate matching results in a wide variety of flows. PIV velocity information is used to provide guidance to the matching algorithm. In addition, matches are made iteratively and validated by an outlier detection scheme. When this method is tested on synthetic images it results in matches which are typically reliable more than 98% of the time. A simple modification to the principle of proximity is introduced which reduces the PTV method's errors in highly shearing flow, as well as improving performance in general for various flow types. Finally, a natural neighbor-based interpolation technique is investigated for use in estimating flow derivatives using scattered velocity data. This interpolation method is compared with other existing techniques in terms of accuracy, sensitivity to noise, computational efficiency, and spatial resolution. It is found that the natural neighbor interpolation is less accurate than RBF and kriging interpolation methods, and more sensitive to noise, despite the use of a denoising technique.