Module 3, section 3.2

How does the "legal right" DRP substantively differ from the "community
objections" DRP?

Commentary. The proposed process for the "legal right" DRP appears to
have a proposed cost two orders of magnitude less than the proposed cost
for the proposed process for "community objections" DRP. The choice of
proposed vendors may explain a difference in pricing, but if the
underlying process is not two orders of magnitude different in
complexity, than the difference in cost has no justification other than
the vendor choice.

If th "legal right" DRP involves forming judgements on questions of
"substantal" (opposition) and "likelihood" (detriment), how is two
orders of magnitude of cost difference commercially reasonable for the
cost of forming similar judgements for "community objections"?