Work blog + UK supreme court | The Guardianhttp://www.theguardian.com/money/work-blog+law/uk-supreme-court
Indexen-gbGuardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. 2015Sun, 02 Aug 2015 18:55:14 GMT2015-08-02T18:55:14Zen-gbGuardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. 2015The Guardianhttp://assets.guim.co.uk/images/guardian-logo-rss.c45beb1bafa34b347ac333af2e6fe23f.pnghttp://www.theguardian.com
Sharing employment will only lead to an intergenerational struggle for workhttp://www.theguardian.com/money/work-blog/2012/apr/27/discrimination-at-work-work-and-careers
Job sharing is a nice idea, but a recent court judgment means employers can now get rid of older workers on the grounds of helping younger ones get into work<p>It would seem unnecessary to point out the paradox of five justices of the supreme court, average age 69 and each able to retire at 75, telling the rest of us we <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2012/apr/25/age-discrimination-employers-retirement-dates" title="Money: Age discrimination ruling allows employers to set retirement dates">shouldn't necessarily expect to keep our jobs beyond our 65th birthday</a>.</p><p></p> <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/money/work-blog/2012/apr/27/discrimination-at-work-work-and-careers">Continue reading...</a>Discrimination at workWork & careersMoneyUK supreme courtLawEmployment lawFri, 27 Apr 2012 10:59:10 GMThttp://www.theguardian.com/money/work-blog/2012/apr/27/discrimination-at-work-work-and-careersPeter Dazeley/Getty ImagesIn with the new: younger workers will be just as desperate for work as their older counterparts. Photograph: Peter Dazeley/Getty ImagesPeter Dazeley/Getty ImagesIn with the new: younger workers will be just as desperate for work as their older counterparts. Photograph: Peter Dazeley/Getty ImagesRichard Alcock2012-04-27T10:59:10Z