Breaking the chains, winning the games, and saving Western Civilization.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

The eyes have it

Look at the the look in the white girls' eyes as they take in the invaders in their burqahs. They know. For all the moral posturing and the virtue-signaling about diversity and vibrancy and multiculturalism they will parrot, they know. And they are afraid.

They are waiting for men to defend and protect them. But they will not respond to you until you demonstrate that you will stand up for the West, that you will stand up for them and their children.

86 comments:

"Look at the the look in the white girls' eyes as they take in the invaders in their burqahs. They know. For all the moral posturing and the virtue-signaling about diversity and vibrancy and multiculturalism they will parrot, they know. And they are afraid.

They are waiting for men to defend and protect them. But they will not respond to you until you demonstrate that you will stand up for the West, that you will stand up for them and their children."

I gave the same look to a couple of those black letterboxes today. Repulsive. I felt like I could sense other people's anger with them as well. Or maybe it was just confirmation bias from all the Islamic attacks in Europe. Mine was real though.

Those Islamic women have to stink. Warm weather and covered from head-to-toe in black; good grief, no wonder Muslim men are angry all the time! Their ladies smell like a laundry room hamper and probably have pit and cooter hair.

I live in a conservative area. You're seeing a handful of hijab wearers here and there within two square miles of the our local den of inequity alias the regional university. Per Nara, no one says anything but in your gut are the undeniable desires of expression: Revulsion and the need to yell, "Get the fuck out of here." The heart and the gut know, and so does the brain until the political pickling has turned it to mush.

Cosmic karma.... These are the very same women who sold the West out. There are few reasons to defend them, and even fewer children. As long as these women control society, it is unlikely that a defense will be forthcoming.

Only a Career Cuck would 'stand up' for the Western matriarchies. Ain't fighting for the right of the daughters of Barry Soetoro and Donald Trump to continue in rule. While wearing black bikinis. But thanks anyway.

The nastiest stuff being done to women in the Caliphate are being done by women. Not joking here. The all women's Al-Khansa acts a gendarme whose writ is enforce sharia on other women. The most common punishment they dish out is biting. Think about that for a moment or two.

Here's the thing that 99% of people don't get about the Islamists...It's Muslim women who are the fountainhead of it all.

Only a Career Cuck would 'stand up' for the Western matriarchies. Ain't fighting for the right of the daughters of Barry Soetoro and Donald Trump to continue in rule. While wearing black bikinis. But thanks anyway.

One of the premises for blogs like Alpha Game is that culture, at the family and national level, falls to men to establish. It's always on men to check the behavior of women, including excluding them from polite society for their nonsense.

Men are sitting behind the wheel. Whatever happens, whatever is said, whatever is agreed to, only Men can steer a straight course for society.

Some of the Deltas here need a better script they sound like they are going the Way of the Donut and Big Jar of Lotion Way. Them little bitches are waiting for a conquerer at least one of her own tribe

WS Lind noted the state's legitimacy derives from security. Women will lead the 4GW to find men, trade sex, protected or otherwise, for protection. The state has its limits. Protecting women is beyond them (retribution is not, but is not guaranteed to occur, be effective, or severe).

Your women are disgusting. It is impossible to find a white woman who is chaste. They walk naked in the streets. Your ancestors would have been ashamed, 50, 100 years ago. The way European women dressed in those times resembles the Muslim women far more closely than it resembles the publicly naked white women you depict here. You know all of the foregoing. You have no control over your own women. The rate of premarital sex in the U.S. is over 95%. Marriage is already meaningless in your society. The majority of your children are born out of wedlock.

@ deti Taking what you want when you want it is like an oasis for a women's parched libido. That is what distinguishes sexually attractive men from those who aren't. The key is to do it with confidence and charm. When I was young I was an omega. However, during that period in time, women ( some very attractive) would be initially attracted to me . My problem is that my lack of confidence with them would often sabotage everything rather quickly. It wasn't till I became older when it all made sense. Despite my weird omega traits there was a tendency on my part to unapologetically do whatever I felt like doing - even with women. . This would often get me in trouble in all areas: school, church home but in hindsight I realized that it also elicited attraction.

Cataline Sergius indirectly makes a good point. This particular battle is between women, not men. But it's not fear as Vox suggests, it's envy. The envy of women who have little for women who have much. They may not like the burqah but they sure as heck are wondering what it's like to have such a powerful Master.

This picture shows why the White White West has lost its moral authority. It's the culmination of female privilege that began in Europe in the 1500's, about the time of the Protestant Refornation, when the first Bibles that could be read by the white commoner were being published. The white races, the Northern and Western Europeans, have travelled a more or less unbroken cultural path since then, systematically untethering women from their needed masters. Today, they have the freedom to do what they want, where they want and when they want, without regulation, moderation or censure. And obsequious men give it to them, mostly at their own expense. When she wants more, always more, he gives more, and more.

Men of moral substance do not, will not, and should not fight for sluts who make sport of rejecting them. They do, will and should fight for women who treasure their purity.

And so does God.

White men of the West, the only way to survive the coming the coming night is to take charge of your women. Be pure in body mind and soul yourselves, then clothe your women in modesty, teach them, rebuke them and correct them. Raise your daughters in purity and faith. Prune back the jungle around and tend your garden. Then you can come to the table with your theories about race and moral authority.

If you keep the blatant moral hypocrisy going, Sharia Law will soon become a reality wherever the scenes in the picture occur. It's not right, and it's certainly not inevitable, but it is as real and present a danger as SJW convergence. The women in the picture are surely feeling it. Trump can't stop what is already here. Guns will not help you, as the enemy fights by stealth and with bombs and is raising up men who are far more willing than you to die for their cause. Western hypocrisy just gives them wings.

Acknowledge your unworthiness, repent, be forgiven, then do better for Christ's sake. It's your only defence against the enemy.

Well, on one hand its best to remain clothed for ones spouse in that he should be the only one to see you, if he is ok with your wearing what you want then many of us would take off those miserable suits and hit the ocean buff. I dont have time to return to the 3rd century for a religion that I cannot consent to or be accepted into, I'm white therefore jislam will never do for me.

Bob, if you'd talk with them as young single women who dont know their way in life whom are trying to download vitamin d via sunlight, they'd talk with you, dont be embittered, young woemn or all woman are kinda crazy and childlike in their mindsets when single-I dont know though -

The gamma men are just wrecks, I have a gamma at the gym who wont stop and I just ignore it and coexist but similar to jisazalm I cannot even coexist with the gamma on a headtrip, totally embarrassing in that all we are all doing is working out. However, I return to a point where I just evade the men and not invade their weight room, I just go else where versus stomaching a defeatist prick gamma punk. Fed up with gamma, Fed up with all this morbid ugly fashion.

Lucien, darling, those whom are chaste stateside or abroad have access to clothing optional beaches, its about vitamin d and be free from uncomfy swimsuits to swagger into the water bare with few people watching, inf fact, if you'd go to the clothing optional beaches from 5am to 7am many women are there with little clothing. Cool water reduces swelling, cools the body, reduces pain that young women under 45 experience.

Other men know what I mean, and surely you do to - rethink or dont swiftly slut shame the chaste or the celibate but its your free speech.

Today was I was doing yoga in pants and sports bra where few could see me in 90 to 100 degree heat, its tantric to detox via sweating.

I only count two women in the picture who are doing something that is physically difficult, requires determination and mental toughness, and does not make them look sexually desirable, regardless of how this comes across to all the other women in the picture.

I'm sure there's some attention-drawing at work, but compared to what they're going through every moment in that hot sun, I think it's much more likely that they're doing it for their men and they're doing it for God.

Which women in that picture do you think would be most-qualified to carry fifty or seventy pounds worth of equipment five miles under the same temperatures because you personally need that equipment? I know which ones I would pick.

They may not like the burqah but they sure as heck are wondering what it's like to have such a powerful Master.

Actually, most Western girls I know despise Arab men. As I mentioned above, their religion is intrinsically Gamma, and the behavior of their men bears this out.

Which women in that picture do you think would be most-qualified to carry fifty or seventy pounds worth of equipment five miles under the same temperatures because you personally need that equipment? I know which ones I would pick.

How do you know the women in the picture wearing burqahs are Arabs? The burqah is Muslim attire, it's not limited to Arabia.

Muslim women do not wear the burqah for the sake of men. They do it in submission to their Master, whoever that is. Could be a man, could be fear of their Muslim sisters, but more likely it's the Feminine Imperative, acknowledging the greater power.

This is a very complicated, non-binary subject. I wouldn't call all these western women sluts....I imagine it's not easy having to look good publically parading around in their underwear to establish social respectability among their own competitive sex, and to land the attention of suitable mates from my (male) sex. They're responding to the world and the norms they were born into. Likewise I don't automatically consider Muslim women to be inherently modest for covering-up and "protecting" us poor, weak men from the feminine charms of their faces, hair, and bodies, any more than I can imagine Superman not occasionally smirking as he masquerades as Clark Kent (not a comic book guy, but the metaphor is the best I can come up with for now). I also have no doubt that Muslim women manipulate their men just as readily as other women have done everywhere throughout history. I've also read that it's Muslim women who are almost entirely responsible for reprehensible abuse and traditions against their subordinates, like submitting their daughters to female genital mutilation. The women push for that, not the men. And it's not much of a stretch for women to submit to a strong will...I get the idea that even Hillary enjoys playing dress-up and wearing a head-scarf when she was in Afghanistan, etc. My own devout Christian mother was more than willing to put on a head covering herself when she visited the Holy Land two years ago and wanted to tour the Dome of the Rock. The Muslim men didn't want her there though so it didn't happen.

All I know is that A) after marriage(if I should be so lucky as to ever find and land a woman worthy of the trouble) i would forbid her from wearing a bikini in public, and B) I would kill or die trying to prevent an male from the "religion of submission" from subjugating my wife, sisters, or daughters into the cult of their pedophile prophet.

Pardon my sloppy writing and overabundance of the word "I". It's very late here and there's no time for proper editing. If the West falls though, it's our fault, and the fault of our fathers and grandfathers who gave women what they said they wanted rather than what they needed. It's nearing the time of open war on feminists, white knights, and all hostile invaders.

My take on the girls' reactions, left to right: disgust/contempt, disgust and fear, disgust/contempt. There's a range of three emotions there, and none of them are positive.

Western women don't want to be in burqahs. They want to look alike in other ways, via matching bikinis. It's jarring for them to see the people they invited in not take up their fashion and customs. It's like inviting someone new to your house and realizing suddenly that they are nothing like you. All they hope for is for the man of the house to kick them out as soon as possible--by force, if necessary.

To you commenters who are proudly declaring you won't fight. OK, you're angry with the general worthlessness of young Western women today. Fine. The problem you have is the fight is coming to you anyway, regardless of those women.

The brutal reality is that as men you will only have the same three choices you've ever had when your lands are being invaded:

1. Fight, whether by combat, work, or at the very least, tacit support, on the side of your tribe.

2. Join the invading enemy.

3. Go hide in a hole, facing the reality that the invaders may kill you anyway because you're still -their- enemy, and that whichever side wins, they might see you as worth less than the space you currently take up.

Your options do not include sitting off in some self-proclaimed noble huff. Or rather, not without consequences. And if you're one of those 'I have no nation' types, you've already shown where you stand.

I was in Dubai a couple years ago. There was a European gal in front of me in that mall by the Burj Khalifa that was wearing a miniskirt that was borderline acceptable by western standards. The burqa-clad natives were giving the same stinkeye the women in this photo are giving them.

What manner of cuckery is this. Fight? That ship has sailed a long time ago friend. I fight for my survival and nothing more. Let the white knights and cucks do the fighting (They actually won't do anything fighting, violence is not in their vocabulary).

And lmao at all the comments posted, I think for men to fight today, specifically white men they'd have to be given three late in their teens virgins, otherwise they won't give a fuck.

Maybe I haven't been reading that closely, but I haven't seen anyone say that they'd refuse to fight the invaders. More like they don't consider the women in this picture to be reason enough on their own.

Which one of these girls is mine and has declared herself so in word and deed (such as bearing my children). I'm gonna fight for her and my kids. Random girls who all voted for Obama and will be voting for Hillary? They're on their own.

Which one of these girls is mine and has declared herself so in word and deed (such as bearing my children). I'm gonna fight for her and my kids. Random girls who all voted for Obama and will be voting for Hillary? They're on their own.

@ PA (read your post)I understand (as a former white-knight) the instinctual desire to want to do something, but white-knighting must stop if things are to get better. If girls think they can continue to get something (i.e. protection) for nothing, then nothing is what they are going to give. I already have a wife and children (boys) who depend on me. I'm trying my best to raise my boys to have a "redpill" mentality. To value and protect what is theirs. There's no place for white-knighting in the curriculum.

Instead of talking maybe people should do something. Maybe people should form something like a neighborhood watch for areas that have lots of Muslims. Volunteers in gtouos of four can cruise around in cars in modlim areas. Groups of four can patrol placed like the site in the picture above on foot. If the women in the photo saw four saw four men on their side keeping an eye in things it might have reassured them.

Two bulls standing on a hill, the younger bull turns to the older bull and says, "Look down in the valley a herd of cows, let's run down and there and fuck one of them." Older bull turns to the younger bull with a bemused look on his mature face and says, "Let's walk down there and fuck them all."

Then you got the fappers here who ran off the hill away from the valley and had their balls chopped off and called themselves virtuous.

Riffing off what Nat said above, make some friends, improve yourselves and then be the bulls who bull their way thru a crowd of heifers, one of them at sometime will stand for you.

How do you know the women in the picture wearing burqahs are Arabs? The burqah is Muslim attire, it's not limited to Arabia.

@UnknownMost of the time, Muslim women keep their faces uncovered. The walking tent is limited mainly to Arabia, Afghanistan, and ISIS territory. Unsurprisingly, those are the epicenters of cousin marriage and goat- and boy-rape.

@Stg58/Animal Mother--""Sounds like Death Head has no plans to be fruitful and multiply."--"What girl would want you guys who are whining and complaining? You're compounding your original lack of attractiveness."

Even though a clueless tramp like you is dumb to connect the dots, these pathetic attempts to use shame, induce guilt and the obvious veiled manipulation DO NOT WORK ANYMORE!!

I don't give a flying fuck if some rotund mattress back whore like you thinks I'm "attractive" because we both know that's an impossible task to achieve for any man today. I have zero interest in saving some lazy, spoiled, selfish, neurotic and overly entitled fat sow decreeing that I can only be considered "attractive" if I will fight the horde for a disease ridden cunt as penance for her lifetime of deceit after she gleefully welcomes the savages in.

You will become nothing but chattel and a self propelled blow up doll for the 3rd world scum, so your cries of agony will be music to my ears. As you lay beaten and bloody face down in the snow abandoned and starving.... I will laugh and relish in your richly deserved suffering.

Oh golly, some little shit stain is yapping about how manly he is based on a fucking fictional character in a movie, then has to explain it as if that makes him special, well color me shocked!

I don't care what some loud mouthed no nothing wanker like you thinks, especially one who hasn't the slightest clue about the real world. You're just not quite swift enough to figure out that a little retard who doesn't know a fucking thing about me isn't that intimidating, you're actually a sad joke with that twaddle.

Go clean the sand out of your pussy, find a hug box, or go cower in your precious safe space, makes me no never mind because you'll still die for some worthless trollop just the same.

The white women on the picture are probably all childless and single. Most of them don't even have husband candidates, let alone husbands, because they don't want any. They want to still "have their fun", "find themselves" etc. They'll either become spinsters, or have one child, maybe two, in their early 30s.

The only men who'll conceivably have any interest and sense of obligation to protect them are the fathers, or more precisely, sires, of their children.

These women probably lack any mental concept of the "West" as well. They don't know what it is.

"One of the premises for blogs like Alpha Game is that culture, at the family and national level, falls to men to establish. It's always on men to check the behavior of women, including excluding them from polite society for their nonsense.

Men are sitting behind the wheel. Whatever happens, whatever is said, whatever is agreed to, only Men can steer a straight course for society."

You're expecting the fulfillment of a complete fantasy. To rise up as a collective countercultural force in order to bend all women to their will is something men have never done. That's not how the "patriarchy" worked. What average men did in fact do throughout the ages was to assume responsibility for their female relatives, wives and daughters, as long as they were permitted and expected to do so by their own parents, the mothers of the women in question, and the entire culture and society around them. Most men have never done anything in their lives that wasn't explicitly permitted and expected by other women - their mothers, female relatives and potential wives.

It was never men who checked the behavior of women. That's a recent tradcon myth. Women's behavior is always checked by other women: her mother and her female peers, the herd. If any man checks her behavior, it's normally done with the permission of her mother and her father (if the former agrees to it), and the permission of his own parents. In other words, any male "checking" that takes place is indirect, and depends on female permission.

(Of course, women's behavior was also checked by the lack of reliable contraceptives, safe abortion and female economic independence.)

This still applies. Society, culture, women and parents no longer permit any man to check the behavior of any woman, so it's no longer done. Most men are beta, and only do anything if women allow it and want it. They don't seek to seize control over women on their own. This has never been done.

""They are waiting for men to defend and protect them. But they will not respond to you until you demonstrate that you will stand up for the West, that you will stand up for them and their children."

But only if you are sexually attractive."

And what incentives does a sexually attractive Western man have to risk his livelihood and life picking a fight with Muslim immigrants, feminists, leftists, the entire current political system? None. He has pussy on tap. He isn't even expected to financially support the women he's fucking, because those women all work or receive some sort of welfare. He's not invested in any type of Western cultural renaissance, whatever that is supposed to be. What does he have to gain by fighting? If he wants to fuck some white woman but some Arab guy takes her as his own, he'll just find some other white woman to fuck without much effort.

The funny thing is that everyone knows this already. Just look at any alt-right site, red pill blog, tradcon site, feminist site, or any mainstream medium that discusses male-female relations. Do any of them address the alphas, do any of them even talk to alphas? No. All that content is directed at betas. Betas are given advice, they are implored to do this, do that, stop doing this, stop doing that. Why? Because nobody assumes that you can get alphas to do anything. They have access to women, they get their balls drained - why should they make an effort to do anything difficult? Everybody knows betas are the only social group willing to make sacrifices, to assume risks.

What's up with the people who come here with bad ass names? Deaths Head, Hell's Hound...and then advocate running away. You can take that approach all you want, but Islamic war is coming your way. And there is not neutral ground. Your skin is your uniform. I hope you're not really a 300 pound basement dweller.

And what incentives does a sexually attractive Western man have to risk his livelihood and life picking a fight with Muslim immigrants, feminists, leftists, the entire current political system? None.

@Deaths HeadYou're an idiot. Even if you did have all the pussy on tap you would want (and quite honestly, you don't strike me like the type who does), would you really want to be regularly dodging scum trying to kill you on a daily bases, and dealing with a tyrannical, bureaucratic, utterly corrupt government that is constantly trying to rip you off?

Even if nonwhite immigrants start randomly killing natives on a massive scale, which is a slim possibility, their likely targets won't be sexually attractive native men. They don't represent a threat. They're mostly just using native women for casual sex, which is the same thing Muslims are doing. There's no conflict of interest. The average Western alpha isn't involved in any political issue, and he doesn't care that much about his government at all. In all likelihood, he looks down on anti-government activists as whiny, loser betas.

Moreover, it's one thing to fight for self-defense, and an entirely different thing to rise up to defend the "virtue" of native women, and their children, if those exist at all.

Nope, I have a Jaguar, never liked trucks that much, always liked sedans better.

A little FYI for the rest of you pathetic attention whores that have no fucking clue like the other retards, you can all go right ahead and shove that pussy up on the pedestal all you like. Go die for all the tramps who sold you out, I really don't care, and I also don't give a fuck what stupid delusions you come up with to justify your bullshit posturing.

Trying to use shame or guilt to get me back on the plantation won't work, so refusing to fight for a culture and society of whiny bitches that hold me in such utter contempt isn't "idiotic" VFM #7634, but you're as dumb as the rest so that simple concept is outside your grasp too.

Even if nonwhite immigrants start randomly killing natives on a massive scale, which is a slim possibility, their likely targets won't be sexually attractive native men. They don't represent a threat.

@Hells HoundSorry, bonehead, but they do represent a threat, and in fact, sexually-attractive men are among their top targets. It's just that they prefer to jump you when they outnumber you 10 to 1 since they're cowards. You may not care if your town is overrun with human trash, but eventually, it'll bite you in the arse.

@Deaths HeadI meant Hells Hound that last time. Your handles are quite similar, after all, complete with your inability to use apostrophes properly.

You lack the brains to figure out every town is already "overrun" by the 3rd world trash and it's getting worse every day, and it already bit us in the ass, leg, arm, nose, shoulder, face, and fingers a few decades ago.

Now as far as speaking the late "Eliot Rodgers"... Sad case. Other such souls need to be shown the thorough solid Love of Christ and His SALVATION.

Anyone who claims to be a Christian, ought not make a continual habit of "cursing" or speaking in a haughty, prideful, heathen-like spirit.

It's never a "good thing" to talk down on unsaved, unrepentant believers who have died in their sins (God knoweth).

Other than that, yeah, no man is "obligated" to fight for the continuation of Western Civilization if he does not want to.

It's a choice. Fight or not and do something else. Self-preservation is key.

Thus, it really comes down to who's on GOD'S SIDE and who's just "floating in the world" without a team: God or Satan?

If anyone is on GOD'S SIDE; we know we have a Kingdom worth fighting for. If you're just an unsaved person living in this dystopia of the End Times with no ultimate hope or future to look forward to working for; you are right not to fight.

I don't fight for western civilization or "women"; I fight for CHRIST and HIS KINGDOM! Amen!

Smh... I understand the deceptive craftiness that is at display here by the elder men "shaming" the young men of Western Society to "man up" and go to war to fight for the "women" and "Western Civilization" that is (and needs) to be destroyed for a New Rebirth; but the sheer hypocrisy and cold callousness into "shaming" young men to fight for a nation that doesn't respect or value them is NOT the right and effective way to appeal to the disillusioned young men of this age. I know this upfront.

It's an INSULT to my face. Really boils my blood in anger when the receiving end is not coming out of a place of Love; but out of the projector's own slyly disguised self-interest.

No one cares what you say, unless they know you care about them as a person. I don't care what anyone says *if* they don't care for me at all as a fellow human-being in compassion and love first. Just telling me I'm obligated to "do something" and not giving a "rat's b-hind" about me as a person and my well-being; I already know you are telling me to do something for YOUR SELF-INTEREST for YOUR AGENDA, for YOUR OWN SELF-CENTERDNESS. Own it. People just "using people" as a thinly-veiled attempt to "hide" their own selfish intentions.

I stand for Christ and He ALONE. I'm not fighting for and dying for any woman or women for the sake "they are women"; they benefit merely as a byproduct NOT the Purpose for the actions I undertake. Amen.