Very welcome suggestions, Antoine!
On 18 Jan 2011, at 11:48, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Ooops it's perhaps a bit too late, I was travelling these past couple of days :-(
>
> But perhaps you can still send the call to other lists: I'd have thought of the open-bibliography@lists.okfn.org, public-xg-socialweb@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org: the less library-specific, the more serendipity :-)
I've sent to these lists just now.
Everyone should feel free to forward onwards, or to suggest other places we can send this call.
>
> Re. Monica's doubts, I think her idea to try and reach to the museum community is excellent, final dot. Cases that would be museum-specific would still be worth for libraries to spy on!
I agree! Is anyone on MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK? Forwarding there, and to other museum-related lists would be helpful. Are there listservs associated with the Museums and the Web conference series?
-Jodi
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
>> Thanks, Monica! :) I've added these to our list, and we'll ping you about requesting a UKOLN blog post (and posting to the museums computer group--are you on that listserv?) when we send this out Monday or Tuesday.
>>
>> Other listserv ideas/publicity venues, anybody?
>>
>> -Jodi
>>
>> On 14 Jan 2011, at 08:12, Monica Duke wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jodi Schneider wrote:
>>>> Hereâ€™s our draft call for use cases for the "social and emergent" cluster:
>>>> * What listservs should we send this? So far, we envision sending
>>>> this to:
>>>> o ASIST, code4lib, public LLD list, AOIR
>>>
>>> If we would like to reach the cultural heritage sector (in the UK at least) I would suggest
>>> 1) a post on the cultural heritage blog
>>> http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/
>>> (I can't guarantee that the request will be posted but I can ask)
>>> and/or
>>> 2) The museums computer group
>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=mcg
>>>
>>> However, with both of these, I would say there is a small risk that the 'library' angle may be missed i.e. we just get museum people responding without necessarily addressing integrating the library angle, or possibly that the 'linked data' side isn't that well known and we get 'social web' responses. Although see this discussion on the MCG list, about open data, in which linked data does at least get a mention:
>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=MCG;e9711de7.1011
>>>
>>> Monica
>>
>>
>