If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Over the past few years staff members here at The OutPost Forum have developed connections with an international network of individuals from several sectors within the Military Industrial Complex. We stay in touch with a number of these people we have met and become friendly with because we have interests in common, not because they can "do something for us". When
...

As you may have read in my previous post, A Diamond Shaped UFO Over Manhattan – September 17, 2011, I closed out case 32025 as an “Unknown”. Unbeknownst to me at the time, MUFON’s Texas STAR Team (Strike Team Area Research) was also conducting an investigation into my case. I found out about it when I read the article by Frank Coffman in the April, 2012 issue of the MUFON eJournal, titled “Part 3: Rectangular Object
...

When the United States Air Force published its first report on the Roswell incident in July 1994, reactions ranged from general acceptance among the mainstream media, to outrage and disbelief from the UFO community. The USAF investigation had been initiated by an enquiry from New Mexico State Representative Steven H Schiff to the General Accounting Office (GAO) (1). The final document, entitled; The Roswell Report: Fact Versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert, (2) was co-authored by Col. Richard L. Weaver, USAF and 1st LT. James McAndrew, USAFR.

The complete report is now widely available online and has been the subject of intense debate for many years. Charges of “whitewash” or “cover-up” are commonplace, and for many the Mogul hypothesis does not offer a satisfactory explanation for much of the available witness testimony. Col. Weaver, now retired, has kindly agreed to answer a few questions and address some
...

I've been involved in alien abduction research since 1994. Over the years I've gained some insights which I think help explain the dynamics in the phenomenon. Below I'll first give the nutshell version of eight of my current ‘working hypotheses' with regard to Alien Abductions. Then, I'll elaborate shortly on each of the items.

Existence of a treaty – The US Government has had contact with extraterrestrial civilizations, and this resulted in a treaty with a consortium of aliens.

Content of the treaty – Part of the treaty was a deal in which technology was exchanged for the right to abduct, on the condition that the people were not harmed, and returned without any memory of the event. Lists of people who had been abducted had to be handed over. Other aspects involve the permission to have bases on US soil, as well as an exchange program.

US Military involvement – Somewhere along the line, it became clear that things went wrong, which resulted in a change in MO, where the USG would be more actively involved in the abductions, in order to make sure that they had some control or at least a clearer view on what was going on. The result of this is that many abductees remember seeing military personnel working together with aliens.

RE-ABS – Apart from this, but for the same reason, i.e. to get a clearer picture of what is going on, the Military abducts abductees and questions them. (MILABS, type 1 – also labelled ‘RE-ABS').

Intruders – They found out that apart from the aliens with whom a treaty was made, other aliens had started engaging in abductions, too, outside of the control of the USG.

If some unidentified flying objects (UFOs) are related to intelligent visitors from elsewhere, what is the impact on national security and global security? This is a question that may have faced U.S. and international officials at least since the World War II era.

Wartime security and secrecy procedures probably would have been implemented in such a case. The alleged
...

UFO DISCLOSURE: ARE "DUMBED-DOWN" APPROACHES NEEDED FOR FUTURE WHITE
HOUSE UFO PETITIONS?! / WILL ADDRESSING THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR --
POLITICIANS WHO ARE TERRITORIAL WHEN KEEPING THEIR OWN SECRETS -- REALLY
WORK BETTER?! –
By Steve Hammons, Joint Recon Study Group, Viewed on Sunday, December
11, 2011

Petitions to the White House asking for the release of more information
about unidentified flying objects (UFOs) have stirred up controversy,
curiosity and hope for improved public understanding about the UFO
phenomena.

Some observers seem to think the petitions are dumb, especially if they
associate UFOs with some kinds of intelligent beings from elsewhere.

Another concern is that asking for the truth from politicians is often
not successful, no matter what the topic may be.

Additionally, the high classification and secrecy about the subject
could be related to legitimate
...