Cutting across the Chicago Architecture Biennial: the Myth-Making of New-Territories / M4

The Chicago Architecture Biennial marked one of the few times that New-Territories has presented publicly as François Roche and Camille Lacadée, rather than this avatar. Credit: New-Territories

Despite its economy of presentation – just text and video, nothing flashy or interactive – the installation #mythomaniaS at the Chicago Architecture Biennial offers a density of thought at once alluring and abstruse. In this, it well conveys the concerns and formal strategies of its slippery authors, the Bangkok-based French-born collective currently known as New-Territories, but also M4 (MindMachineMakingMyths), formerly R&Sie (a near homophone of heresy in French), and occasionally François Roche and Camille Lacadée.

A set of monitors plays several of their mesmerizing and visually-lush videos that were made in collaboration with some of the most influential artists of the day, including Pierre Huyghe and Carsten Holler. Filmed across the world, from Bangkok and its environs to the snow-covered Swiss Alps, they should be read as “architectural scenarios,” something like provocations or insinuations of possible ways of relating to a context. “Environments and paranoia as symptoms of an inner condition, in a constant exchange between narrative and emergence,” states an accompanying text. Visually, these videos tend towards a particular repertoire of techniques; chiefly, vignette-like blurred edges that induce a febrile sensation in the viewer.

At their best, Roche and Lacadée have a unique ability to conjure new worlds into reality. Populated by feral children, shy robots, and Tourette’s patients, their films probe the boundaries between the fictive and the real, the human and the nonhuman, the rational and the irrational. There is an abiding concern – perhaps one that verges on a fetishization – for psychopathologies and illness. All of this also makes its way into their architectural practice. Or, rather, their built practice merges with their video work, experiments with robotics, essays and other writings. New-Territories / M4 are squarely positioned in the (sizable) camp of Chicago Biennial participants who would likely prefer to forever banish the refrain “Is it architecture?”

And really, the question is moot when discussing the work of such capable trans-disciplinarians. New-Territories / M4 invoke nearly every concern at the cutting edge of contemporary architectural thinking – from post-humanism to globalization to emerging economic structures to robotic technologies – without indulging in that debilitating tendency of architects to claim a single issue as their signature concern. Yet they also don’t suffer from the inverse problem; their purview is large, but their research remains focused. It seems that they place the prescription to single-issue thinking itself near the top of their (long list) of rules to be broken, which would also probably include any normative definition of architecture. “The ‘forbidden’ is reintroduced as a possible, and what was rejected as an improper ingredient within our computer graphic idealization of the world is coming back…” they write.

Unfortunately, the two fragments I have quoted are among the few that are likely legible to those without at least some exposure to late 20th century continental philosophy. This isn’t necessarily a problem in itself – experimental academic writing has its place, including in the architectural sphere – unless you’re an architect whose self-styling as heretic is tethered to an anti-authoritarian position. Both during the opening week (in the interest of full disclosure: specifically during an event hosted by Archinect, over the course of an interview I conducted) as well as more recently on Facebook, Roche and Lacadée decried the “hygienist strategy” of the Biennial curators and participants, their “bio-politics, greenish-color and bottom-up slumy romanticism.”

Let it be said, such an internally-generated critique felt largely, and noticeably, lacking at the Chicago Biennial. I applaud New-Territories/M4 for their willingness to bite the hand that feeds. Auto-critique and – to be frank – outright antagonism have historically been, and continue to be, vital to a discipline that is more likely to dislocate a shoulder patting itself on the back then notice – let alone admit to – its own bad behavior. And, without getting into particularities I can’t (or am not equipped to) handle here, their criticism likely had its merits. But I doubt many were able to parse it.

In short, Roche and Lacadée employ a verbose, often-inscrutable prose of the post-Deleuzian variety: full of hyphens, neologisms, and other linguistic ‘becomings.’ I suspect that today, rather than signal towards the radical, emancipatory potentials of the philosophies it mimes, this writing style tends to primarily evoke pretension, academicism, and general elitism. It’s a mode of writing that has been thoroughly institutionalized by three to four decades of manhandling and mistreatment by art gallerists and architecture thesis candidates.

Unfortunately, for at least a few visitors to the Biennial, this will foreclose a wonderful encounter with one of Roche and Lacadée's strange worlds, let alone an archi-political revelation.

7 Comments

The CAB looks like the perfect storm of opportunistic artists and link bait curators. Verges on borderline unethical when there are architectural issues to discuss. Remember folks, design is art with a purpose, not an end in itself. Repeat that with me....

On the morning of the day that Patrick Schumacher called Francois Roche "the ultimate tragic clown", thank you for this article, Nicholas, which definitely helps me place the call and response between these two in context. Excellent write-up.

I don t think they are politics in sense of old system of confrontation, face to face, the dominant-dominated infatuations and discourses. Check the LOG#25 "reclaimingresistanceresilence" mixing mathematics, operaism (philosophy) and masochism. Their ran at Chicago, in direct live (https://soundcloud.com/archinect/mini-session-9-new-territories), before the Patrick Jealousy nervous poo, about the taste of the arts as principle of exclusion, specifically in the situation of the social center down town, quoting Pierre Bourdieu, didn't seem so much in-appropriated ; As the refusal to be in the Digital Archaeology event, by denying to be categorized through a niche, despite the historical direct profit_Niches they denounced openly_""from fetishism neoliberal or Libertarian geek facing carnival of left side activism as a symmetric story telling entertainment""_. Is is a symptom they are last month on Acadia and Chicago, and each time as an anomaly of curating. The supposed intentional weakness of their Chicago presentation (near the toilet) seems also to be questionable. Just a text, just information of what they are doing since few years, no installation, just a book 'mythomaniaS' about their anthropo-technics? "it s not question to do political movie but to do movie politically", said Godard, in a research of format more than self-complaisance and literal content. Well, to be continued>>>

Nov 21, 15 10:25 pm

Block this user

Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?