@NathanOliver She get is from api and its not closed or delete, she reports in chat within 10s, I do not think it is worth the api call to then check it every 30 s if deleted or closed.... but I will think about it.

Anyway, I just wrote an answer that basically restates what another answer said, except that when I started writing my answer, that one wasn't there yet. The thing is, it took me a while to figure out the code. Is that still fine, or should I self-delete?

@PetterFriberg you're entering the territory of "If that comment was lying around, it wouldn't bother anybody. But if somebody writes a bot to scrape all comments and sees it, it should probably be flagged"

Actually, could I get someone to glance over this and make sure it's not insubstantial? (It's from my bot's account; I'm trying to give it enough rep to make sure that it won't suddenly disappear from chat if it gets downvoted, like, twice. Or gets an answer deleted or something.)

> This bounty question is not a programming question, but a question about the wording in Apple's Human Interface Guidelines about UI wording. I cannot vote to close this question due to the bounty attached. – JAL yesterday

> declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it

@JAL I think I should've mentioned in the Town Hall, that to reduce unwarranted flags, we should add an alert when someone clicks "flag". "Is this really, I mean, really, hurting anybody else's feelings other than you? Then flag."

@TIPS self-deleted. Answer basically said "this is a request for an off-site resource, so it should be closed." Someone downvoted and commented that this wasn't actually a request for an off-site resource