Network Working Group Peggy Karp
Request for Comments: #247 MITRE
NIC 7688 12 October 1971
Categories: Policy, Telnet
Related: #226, 236, 239, 233, 237
Obsoletes: #226
Proferred Set of Standard Host Names
In RFC #226, BBN's TENEX list of Host names was set up as a strawman
set of standard Host names. Comments received since then (an RFC
actually generated comments!!!) have influenced me to propose the
following general rules for forming Host names.
The Host names will be 8 characters in length. The general form is
'-' will be at most 4 characters, formed as follows:
(a) Use the keyword in the site name, if not more than
four characters, e.g., NASA Ames, Case Western
Reserve. ---- ----
(b) Use the standard acronym, if not more than four
characters, e.g., UCLA, RADC, NBS.
(c) If a standard abbreviation exists, use it, e.g., Ill.
(d) If none of the above apply, use the first four letters
in the site name, e.g., Burr, Mitr, Harv.
(e) If none of the above is acceptable to the site, the
technical liaison should select the site mnemonic.
will be at most 4 characters of the form .
Examples of mfg. # are:
IBM 360 2 digit model number
IBM 370 3 digit model number
PDP 1 - 2 digit model number
Burroughs 4 digits
CDC 4 digits
etc.
[Page 1]
RFC #247
will be used when more than one machine of the same
type is located at a site (e.g., 2 PDP-10s at MIT, at SRI, and
at BBN).
Limiting to 4 characters does not permit distinctions
to be made between machines with 4 digit mfg. #s. I expect
the situation will be handled in an ad hoc manner by the NIC if
it arises.
TIPs are identified as 'TIP' rather than by '316'. If a Host
is not to be permanently addressable, the machine is identified
as 'TEST'.
A list of Host names, formed according to these rules, is
attached. Alternate Host names should be provided, as
suggested by Jon Postel (RFC #236). RFC's 206, 233, and
236 present lists with 4-character alternate names. The
Technical Liaison should select the alternate name for his
site and communicate the selection to the NIC.
The preceding rules and the attached list of Host names are
subject to the approval of the NWG. Hereafter, the list will
be generated and maintained by the NIC in cooperation with
the Technical Liaison at each site, as suggested in RFC #237.
Comments should be addressed to Dick Watson.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ]
[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]
[Page 2]
RFC #247
Attachment 1
NETWORK ADDRESS STANDARD NAME
--------------- -------------
1 UCLA-7
65 UCLA-91
2 SRI-10NI
66 SRI-10AI
3 UCSB-75
4 UTAH-10
5 BBN-516
69 BBN-10A
133 BBN-10B
6 MIT-645
70 MIT-10DM
134 MIT-10AI
7 RAND-65
71 RAND-10
8 SDC-75
9 HARV-10
73 HARV-1
137 HARV-11
10 LL-67
74 LL-TX2
138 LL-TSP
11 SAIL-10
12 ILL-11
76 ILL-6500
13 CASE-10
14 CMU-10
15 BURR-6500
79 BURR-TEST
16 AMES-67
144 AMES-TIP
145 MITR-TIP
18 RADC-645
146 RADC-TIP
19 NBS-11
147 NBS-TIP
148 ETAC-TIP
21 TINK-418
22 MCCL-418
23 USC-44
151 USC-TIP
152 GWC-TIP
25 NCAR-7600
153 NCAR-TIP
158 BBNX-TEST
[Page 3]
RFC #247
Attachment 2
An Implementation Scheme
If the standard Host names are formed according to the proposed
rules, the following implementation scheme, suggested by Steve
Crocker, can be used.
Map into an 8-bit number, S and
map into an 8-bit number, M,
where
S + M = Network Address.
S and M can be selected such that specification of
alone could cause a default to the "primary" Host at
the site. Note that this scheme depends on a unique
designator for each IMP.
Some examples:
If the "primary" Host at UCLA is the 91, let
UCLA -> S = X'41'
7 -> M = X'40'
91 -> M = X'00'
then for
UCLA-7, S + M = X'01' = 1 base 10
UCLA-91,S + M = X'41' = 65 base 10
and
UCLA alone = X'41' = 65 base 10
If the primary Host at BBN is TENEX System A, let
BBN -> S = X'45'
516 -> M = X'40'
10A -> M = X'00'
10B -> M = X'C0'
then for
BBN-516, S + M = X'05' = 5 base 10
BBN-10A, S + M = X'45' = 69 base 10
BBN-10B, S + M = X'85' = 133 base 10
and
BBN alone = X'45' = 69 base 10
The primary Host for each IMP would be designated by the
site and such information disseminated by the NIC.
[Page 4]