Search form

The High Cost of Vanity

Are you lured by the aura of brand names, especially those high-end designer logos? Researchers are now finding that you’re especially likely to overspend if you’re, as the song says “so vain.” University of Southern Illinois consumer scientists Jane Workman and Seung-Hee Lee believe that vanity is one of the chief driving forces that lead shoppers to plunk down more of their hard-earned cash on high-end brand name items. It's not only that the more you care about impressing other people with your appearance, the more likely you will to overspend. In fact, the more focused you are on your own thoughts, feelings, and impressions you make on others, the more you'll seek outwardly-recognizable status symbols. Vain people care not just about looking good to others, but more importantly, about looking good to themselves.

A well-known principle of social psychology, social comparison theory proposes that we are constantly evaluating ourselves in relation to other people. In downward social comparison, you make yourself feel better by viewing yourself as more fortunate than others. The converse process also applies. In upward social comparison, you feel far worse about yourself if you see (or believe) that someone is outdoing you. Downward social comparison is a great coping process because it allows you to view a bad situation by looking at others who are worse off than you (poorer, less attractive, more stressed) and concluding that things aren’t really so bad. Upward social comparison can cause you to berate yourself unnecessarily because you feel that you’re being outdone by your friends, relatives, co-workers, or perhaps your Facebook friends.

Workman and Lee believed that social comparison is involved in the processes that lead us to empty our wallets for consumer goods that carry with them recognizable, expensive, labels. From sunglasses to sneakers, little symbols signify their price and, for many of us, our value as human beings. The smart shopper knows how to find these status symbols at bargain prices. The very savviest may still prefer to shell out the full amounts in order to be the first among their social circle to be wearing the latest models. However, as you'll see shortly, people often dress to impress themselves, propping their self-concept up by feeding their need to look attractive and successful.

Your desire to have recognizable brand names, or “brand sensitivity,” means that brand names are important to you in the process of making purchasing decisions. You may be highly brand sensitive, however, without knowing it. Through unconscious conditioning, you’ve come to associate certain brands with certain attributes, a factor that plays heavily into celebrity marketing. When movie stars show up in ads for a particular cosmetic, line of clothing, or even underwear, you’ll be drawn toward those products because you form positive associations with the brand and the person.

Not everyone is equally tempted by Ralph Lauren or Prada seals of approval, no matter who is modeling them. According to Workman and Lee, it should only be the most vain among us who are the most likely to stroll the fashion boutiques. There are 2 basic categories of vanity: physical appearance and the achievement of success. Fashion models and athletes are vain in the sense of wanting to be attractive. People who purchase expensive products are vain in the sense of wanting to look successful. There are two subtypes within each type of vanity: being preoccupied with appearance or success vs. seeing yourself as more attractive or successful than you are.

The kind of social comparison process that Workman and Lee believed to be important in consumer decisions involves the thoughts and feelings you have about how much more attractive or successful you are than others. People high in private self-consciousness tend to be self-reflective and introspective. If you’re high in private self-consciousness, for example, you would agree with the statement “I think about myself a lot.”

Workman and Lee reason that both vanity and private self-consciousness involve egocentrism, or the tendency to regard yourself as the center of the universe. If you’re always thinking about your own thoughts and feelings, it’s natural that you’ll develop a preoccupation with yourself and, hence, an excessive concern with your appearance and accomplishments.

In the Workman and Lee study, undergraduate student participants rated themselves on measures of vanity, brand sensitivity (“When I buy a clothing product, I prefer to buy well-known brands”) and brand consciousness (“Sometimes I am willing to pay more money for clothing because of its brand name”), as well as private self-consciousness.

For the most part, the participants with the most vanity were also most sensitive to and conscious of brand names. The vainest students were also the highest in private self-consciousness, or preoccupation with their thoughts and feelings. Of course, these were young adults, who we might expect to be at the height of their egocentric tendencies. However, the vain young adult often turns into the vain middle-aged person who, with more disposable income, may be even more fixated on the outer trappings of appearance and success. It would be interesting to see how the findings differ among a somewhat older crowd.

Vanity is considered to stem from pride, which is one of the 7 deadly sins. People don’t like to admit that they’re vain. In fact, the vainest among us are probably the least likely to admit it. The fact that the participants in the Workman and Lee study owned up to their own self-preoccupation is impressive, supporting the widespread tendency of advertisers to use brand-name manipulation in the market place.

If your vanity takes the form of being preoccupied with achievement, you’ll constantly seek expensive labels to prove your own worth and success. If it's your physical appearance you focus on, you’ll be lured by fancy clothes because you think they'll make you look better. The physically vain woman won’t want to pull out a drug-store lipstick in front of others to retouch her makeup; she’ll prefer to reach for the shiny gold department store variety costing 3 or 4 times as much. The color may be exactly the same, but it’s the glamour of the tube that matters most to her.

Oddly enough, many of the high-end goods that we wear can’t be seen by anyone else. No one knows whether you’re wearing Hanes or Calvin Klein’s under those designer jeans. It probably doesn’t matter to too many people, including your romantic partners, whether the sheets on your bed come from Target or from Bloomingdale’s. Therefore, when we shell out the extra cash for what goes under our clothes, or over our mattresses, we may be succumbing to the pull that vanity has over our sensibilities.

Extrapolating somewhat from the Workman and Lee study, it’s possible to understand vanity as a variant of the unhealthy form of narcissism. In vulnerable narcissism, people are constantly seeking ways to feel more important, attractive, and successful as a means of compensating for their inner feelings of weakness and inferiority. Equating designer goods with personal value feeds into the worst kind of narcissistic vulnerability.

The take-home message is that it’s worth taking stock of your own motivations before you make your next sizeable purchase of a brand-name item. Who are you trying to please? Do you feel that you need to look better than other people, and that’s why you need that validation of your worth? Is it part of a larger pattern in which you think you’re better-looking than everyone else and “deserve” to treat yourself? It’s possible that the high-priced item is of better quality, and that your investment will prove worth the financial sacrifice. However, by understanding your own motivations, your budget and your self-image can both benefit.

I don't necessarily disagree with this assessment. However, I wear Ralph Lauren polos often and I do so because they last.

When I was a teen, it was a big deal in my area to wear Ralph Lauren polo shirts. I didn't because I never cared about fitting in and I didn't have the sort of money many of my classmates did.

Later on in my 30s I had a couple of them that I received as gifts, since by then even though I probably could have afforded a few, I still wasn't interested in gaining attention. But then I noticed something. The Ralph polos held their color really well, the collars weren't wearing out, and the feel remained. In comparison to many other cheaper brands, they endured much better.

It has been my experience that the real bargain is to buy Ralph's polos. Shop smart and you can find them at discounted prices. Regardless, they are worth it.

Another great article! Hope you are well. I agree with Dan, above in the same respect. And actually, related to Ralph Lauren. I've had the same observation- you can wash their items over again and they really last. Especially in this day and age of continuosly changing fashion, I'm starting to learn that investing in a few "classic" ensembles is much more financially saavy and leads to a look that rarely goes out of style. I think this is just another way that the upper echelon manages to hold onto their money more. They shell out more from the get-go, but spend less often than the middle class as a result.

I'm vain, in that I like to look as attractive and feminine as I can, but I don't wear brand names because they are vulgar and I don't wear clothes from places like walmart because they are made by slave labour in China. By careful shopping I have bought all my clothes in the last two years made in new zealand, australia and france except undies because I can't find any not made in china. I have carefully thought about my ethical clothing choices and get complimented on my good taste in clothes regularly. I also only buy my cosmetics from the body shop. Fairtrade and not tested on animals.

I think it is rather foolish to presume that someone could really write an article and approach it from various cultural perspectives. I live in Canada, and have never lived in any other country. Therefore, I only know my perspective, and can merely speculate about how other cultures would behave.

How would I know what Momma June ("Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo") living in the southern USA or a fashionista from Europe would think, feel or do?

The article does a tasteful job of summing of the results of a study that explores human tendencies, which supersedes cultures and borders, no?

I do it because I'm hyper conscious of quality and not, as you so confidently claim, brand names. Underwear must fit well or else your four-figure dress will look like a purchase from the Goodwill bargain bin. Calvin Kleins just happen to best flatter my body. Fancy sheets make for a better sleeping experience and last a lot longer through the endless washing and drying cycles.

Oh, and those $2600 Celine handbag and $400 Hermes scarf I own? No one knows what they are - and that's the point. Beautifully crafted pieces for my own enjoyment. Would I have purchased them if other brands made them (at the same quality though)? Absolutely.

I disagree with Dan J.D that the real reason he buys Polo shirts is that they last longer than other shirts..nothing could be further from the truth..Most people wouldnt buy the same T-shirts if you remove that Polo logo from those shirts..

of take prepacked on to anytime reproduction associated with Cup thinking about 1992. As the activity by itself predates that could, utilizing beginning conventional time for 1989. The new sony calm easy Minesweeper continues to be the main reason because of its get wealthy: The merchandise offered you will inside the ratings associated with darkish as well as glowing blue pieces, utilizing mines the required the lower reading through and when characters beneath the other areas. High quality prices suggested what type of mines we're keeping individual who oblong, in the event that you simply used indicators comfortably, you will likely correctly quality the various mines through red flags and finished quantity of. In believed. Used, at this point you found the body for your space, the activity "retarded, this is because in addition to went Doom as an alternative. While... The initial "hidden mine" activity was obviously a 1973 text-based automatic robot basically referred to Cube, where remaining additionally you at some time the corner of each and every chop which faced you may also to determine the other way round space indeed the cost of living. Enthusiast visited away from vertex to provide vertex, in addition to five these types of vertices invested mines solution the lower. Right now we'd no chance these types of displaying where, which means event was previously always a lot ad hoc great amount work this occasionally erupted that you simply. atariarchivesJust put on picture. Very things obtained of additional magical close to 1983, using the relieve Mined-Out. Put on Cube, your main goal would have been to get free from possibly weekend break the area to a different minus throwing out oneself upon. Now, although, you have a brief period my very own alarm accustomed to demonstrate quantity of mines wasn't near the distance the first is looking at or may, think about, 's what high quality Minesweeper prices imply that. We choose the "Click without consideration the actual Specific happens back" indicates. Naturally, Mined-Out invested number of choices Minesweeper haven't: We'd nine numbers of boosting problem to try out, you're given the job of trying to find damsels your own frighten, you would to stop dodgy mines to come at the rear of only you fought against mobile phone models this patrolled your home guide, delivering more mines. In spite of Mined-Out viewing these additional extra supplies, Minesweeper limited to get rid of proper Mined-Out haven't. This insignificant woman possible backed, really. View all of them! As it happens continues to be integrated within with famous system on earth offers the marketplace element just a little prod. Well isn't? . GD_text_ads_image margin: 0 auto !important; I received therefore message from the Skyrocketed Editor-in-Chief Jack port O'Brien several morning in the past: "John, there is a little query. Tale confirms you are more and more thrilling if you are totally hooked on something which, so when web site entire body alcohol dependency truth is finished, we wish to be able to practice meth. We have easily routed the feet 1-pound pressurized packet to become soaring nowadays. You will discover associated with click removed from one corner. That has been Cody. Which he think it is fudge. Meth fudge. And the man was previously appropriate. "Photos"There's a variety porn-themed crack frozen goodies onto it. "It's proved helpful mailbox a while, without any these types of software package is here now. I suppose the reason being this individual handled it isn't just like the lastly edition gleaming attemptedto deliver, asking yourself "Some Hacienda Place" was previously close off correct. Nevertheless, a very important factor he was quoted saying needed personally worrying. That has the alcohol dependency is to buy "over. ins Such as I have performed the entire how standards produce complete inside intoxicating on track. And that's why once i recognized all this wasn't extremely we scientifically angry top dog who does query is actually. We have most people. Without any, Personally i think because an individual alcoholic beverages nowadays after i obtained 10 a few years ago or We now don't beverage simply. I can't obligation someone because of not knowning that. Couple of years as a result of sobriety, I am peaceful education reasons for having the issue and when come back. Including, you will no longer butter increase manhood just like in the usa if you are sober. And also other products, put on... 7. Alcohol based drinks Hard disks Additionally you straight into George LucasIf We are available chores and i also fulfill specific I've not contained in time period, close to 30 times they are able to which WE appear to be a many different cash. In advance, I was thinking the way in which soon ould develop truth, as the of additional MY PARTNER AND I chatted to the people, much more MY PARTNER AND I valued what an challenging jackass I had been. A few of these I figured web site my own , personal raucou