Tuesday, April 29, 2014

We
are now in the midst of a season of greatly heightened Satanic ritual,
so stay on guard. The season of preparation has just past, where the
victims chosen for sacrifice have been abducted and prepared. The Grand
Climax extends from 4/26 to 5/1, and the rituals actually continue
through 5/3. 4/30 is Walpurgisnacht, Roodmas Day or Beltane Eve, the
greatest Witches Sabbat. May 1 is May Day, Beltane or Walpurgis Day.

Tuesday the 29th, there will be an annular solar eclipse that will add
substantially to the Adversary's provisioning of this season as it is
leveraged by Occult ritual.

Yesterday, the big event was
in Rome where both Popes held a double canonization at the Vatican,
sponsored by corporate interests. Their event was broadcast globally in
3D High Def projection from their 13 (rebel-lord-beast) cameras
stationed around St. Peter's Square. It included a Mass with Eucharist,
which I've just written about. I exposing that ritual as a baptism and
anointing of the beast that celebrates the implicit 13th day of the 1st
month. (When Will the Lawless One be Revealed? Ninth Installment)
The mark of the beast symbol surrounding the obelisk was filled with
and surrounded by a million worshipers. Truly, a MASS ritual.

"Public
displays in the modern era are rare. The last one was in 2010. The next
one wasn't supposed to be until 2025, but Pope Francis caught the
faithful off guard in December when he moved it up to next year,
authorizing a three-month public exhibition that will begin April 19." (Showing of the shroud of Turin)

This
past Saturday night, after the checkered flag waved ending the NASCAR
Cup race in Richmond, VA (Virginia is for Lovers), two drivers had a
fight. The driver of car #9 punched the driver of car #13 in the left
eye. "Mears wore sunglasses for most of Sunday's event, but it was clear the punch left a gnarly bruise and swollen left eye." (source)

The
13 rebel-lord-beast as Horus, who rules with two eyes, i.e. Harmerty
with his left eye darkened. The left eye was darkened by #9, which is
the single digit number of the beast transformation. The transformation
manifested in the black eye. The driver of #9 is Marcos Ambrose. “Mark
us” with the mark of the beast. Ambrosia - nectar of the gods. He gave
the other driver the mark, transforming him with a darkening of the left
eye into Horus. The driver of #13 is Casey Mears. Double Code 33. C is
the 3rd letter and M is a rotated 3 so CM ~ 33. Casey ~ KC and K is
11th letter and C is 3rd, so KC ~ 3*11=33.

Mears, the meaning of
the name is someone who lived near a boundary, or pond - the beast seen
rising from the sea. The car's main sponsor is Geico and a picture of
their mascot is featured on the car's hood. It's a gecko, a lizard and
reptile, of the serpent family. This one talks and walks upright and
acts like a human, so it's a beast. The sponsor's schtick with the gecko
is a confusion of identity, Geico ~ gecko so there's the (messianic)
identity swap.

Friday, April 25, 2014

We are trading one form of slavery for another.

What I am saying is that all we Americans are trading one form of
slavery for another. All of us are in some measure slaves of the
federal government. Through their oppressive tactics of telling the
ranchers how many cows they can have on their land, and making that
number too low to support a ranch, the BLM has driven every rancher in
Clark County off the land, except me. The IRS keeps the people of
America in fear, and makes us all work about a third or a half of the
year before we have earned enough to pay their taxes. This is nothing
but slavery from January through May. The NSA spies on us and collects
our private phone calls and emails. And the government dole which many
people in America are on, and have been for much of their lives, is
dehumanizing and degrading. It takes away incentive to work and self
respect. Eventually a person on the dole becomes a ward of the
government, because his only source of income is a dole from the
government. Once the government has you in that position, you are its
slave.

I am trying to keep Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream alive. He was
praying for the day when he and his people would be free, and he could
say I’m free, free at last, thank God I’m free at last! But all of us
here America, no matter our race, are having our freedom eroded and
destroyed by the federal government because of its heavy handed tactics.
The BLM, the IRS, the NSA--all of the federal agencies are destroying
our freedom. I am standing up against their bad and unconstitutional
laws, just like Rosa Parks did when she refused to sit in the back of
the bus. She started a revolution in America, the civil rights
movement, which freed the black people from much of the oppression they
were suffering. I'm saying Martin Luther King's dream was not that Rosa
could take her rightful seat in the front of the bus, but his dream was
that she could take any seat on the bus and I would be honored to sit
beside her. I am doing the same thing Rosa Parks did--I am standing up
against bad laws which dehumanize us and destroy our freedom. Just
like the Minutemen at Lexington and Concord, we are saying no to an
oppressive government which considers us to be slaves rather than free
men.

I invite all people in America to join in our peaceful revolution to
regain our freedom. That is how America was started, and we need to
keep that tradition alive.

(this article is, imo, a very important summary of the ridiculous posturing by the Western Banksters in Ukraine, trying their best to drag us into direct conflict with Russia . . howeverthe writer seems to be hopelessly lost in the thinking that socialism is the answer to capitalism . . when all we have ever needed is a Free Market . . Capitalism & Socialism are one and the same . . a few cruel Banksters at the top, and death and misery for the 99% . . .)

By Bill Van Auken

April 24, 2014 "ICH"
- "WSWS"
-
Does Washington want a war with Russia? A review of
recent US actions surrounding the crisis in Ukraine
clearly poses what would have once seemed an
unthinkable question. The Obama administration is
playing a very dangerous game of Russian Roulette.

In the last 48
hours, the Pentagon has announced the deployment of
US paratrooper units to Poland and the three former
Baltic republics of the Soviet Union—Estonia, Latvia
and Lithuania—bringing US troops to Russia’s very
border. Another American warship has been dispatched
to the Black Sea and more US forces are slated to
deploy to Ukraine itself this summer under an
exercise known as Operation Rapid Trident.

These
military moves by Washington are unfolding in the
context of an acute crisis within Ukraine that,
thanks to the machinations of Washington and its
puppets, threatens to erupt into full-blown civil
war.

Less than
one week after signing a joint statement with
Russia, the US and the European Union in Geneva
pledging to end all violence in Ukraine and disarm
illegal groups, the US puppet regime in Kiev has
ordered its military to carry out an
“anti-terrorist” crackdown against the restive
Russian-speaking population in the country’s
industrial southeast. To that end it has dispatched
not only troops, tanks and warplanes, but also armed
thugs from the neo-fascist Right Sector.

The Putin
government in Moscow, which has desperately searched
for an accommodation with Washington, appears to be
waking up to the deadly seriousness of the
situation. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
warned in an English-language interview with the
state-run RT television channel Wednesday that his
government would treat an attack on Russian citizens
in Ukraine as an attack on Russia itself. He raised
as a precedent the August 2008 offensive launched by
the government of Georgia on Russians in South
Ossetia, to which Russia responded by intervening
militarily to repel Georgian forces.

The
implication that the Russian government would carry
out a similar intervention to stop Ukrainian troops
from slaughtering Russian-speaking civilians in the
Donbas region should be treated with the utmost
seriousness.

In the
interview, Lavrov also observed, referring to the
actions of the government in Kiev, that “the
Americans are running the show in a very close way.”
This is indisputable. The regime itself is the
product of a protracted American intervention in the
country’s internal affairs, with some $5 billion in
so-called “democracy promotion” funding pumped into
Ukraine since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in
1991.

These
efforts culminated in the fomenting of a right-wing
opposition movement to destabilize the
Russian-aligned government of President Viktor
Yanukovych by means of street violence. When a deal
was brokered between the opposition and Yanukovych,
Washington ensured that it was scuttled and the
elected president overthrown by fascist paramilitary
forces.The prime
minister of the regime brought to power by the
February 22 fascist-led coup, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, was
handpicked by US officials, who affectionately
referred to him as “Yats.”

The point
person for this operation has been US Undersecretary
of State for Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, a
former chief security adviser to Vice President Dick
Cheney and the wife of Robert Kagan, the founding
chairman of the Project for a New American Century.
She has brought to Ukraine and to Russia itself the
same policy of aggressive war that was implemented
in the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The way in
which Washington calls the shots has been
demonstrated in an even more sinister fashion with
the launching of the first abortive
“counterterrorist” operation in the Donbas in the
immediate aftermath of a covert trip to Kiev by CIA
Director John Brennan, and then its resumption in
the immediate aftermath of this week’s visit by Vice
President Joseph Biden.

From start
to finish, the Ukraine crisis has been instigated by
US imperialism. Every action Washington has taken
has been directed at exacerbating and intensifying
this crisis. The longer this crisis goes on, the
clearer it becomes that US policy is directed not so
much at Ukraine as at Russia itself. Ukraine, it
would seem, is meant merely to provide the pretext
for a war with Russia.Short of
that, it would be used to force a humiliating
capitulation by Moscow that would only set the stage
for redoubled aggression aimed at Russia’s
dismemberment and transformation into a powerless
semi-colony.

Presumably,
those in the White House and the Pentagon believe
that such a conflict would stop short of a nuclear
war, but who knows?

The threat
of a US war on Russia is also apparent in the flood
of war propaganda being unleashed upon the public.
Vladimir Putin is being subjected to the same kind
of demonization previously reserved for Saddam
Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi, while the State
Department and its faithful scribes at the New
York Times serve up “photographic evidence” of
Russian troops in Ukraine that has all the
authenticity of similar “proofs” of Iraq’s “weapons
of mass destruction.”

What
underlies the US war drive? In the run-up to the
Ukraine crisis, Washington had grown increasingly
incensed by Moscow’s role in blocking US war plans
against both Syria and Iran, not to mention Putin’s
granting of asylum to NSA whistleblower Edward
Snowden. Earlier, there was the fiasco that Moscow
dealt Washington in the US-backed 2008 war launched
by Georgia against South Ossetia. The events in
Ukraine suggest that US imperialism has embarked on
a strategy to eliminate Russia as an obstacle to its
drive to assert hegemony over the Middle East and,
more broadly, the landmass of Eurasia.

There are
also internal factors driving Washington to war.
Social contradictions within the United States have
reached a dangerous intensity. Masses of working
people continue to bear the brunt of the capitalist
economic crisis, even as Wall Street recoups its
losses from the 2008 collapse and grows richer than
ever. More and more fingers are pointing at the
super-rich as the party responsible for
unprecedented social inequality and misery in
America.As so often
in the past, war provides an external outlet for
internal social pressures and the danger of domestic
unrest. Under conditions of overwhelming popular
hostility to military intervention, one thing is
certain: a war with Russia would rapidly lead to the
shredding of the Constitution, the abrogation of
democratic rights, the outlawing of political
opposition and a massive escalation of police state
measures.

The
greatest danger would be to underestimate the threat
of war. Even if it is averted or postponed in the
immediate instance, the profound contradictions of
the imperialist system make the catastrophe of a
nuclear Third World War not just a danger, but an
inevitability, outside of the working class
mobilizing its strength internationally in a unified
movement to put an end to capitalism.

(This article sat in one of my browsers for several days . . it is very dark and most of this kind of info, even if true, will be very difficult to 'prove' to a skeptic . . that said, I had about decided not to post it, and closed the browser window . . Then, for some reason, I wanted to look at it one more time, so I did several searches, and would find links, but EVERY ONE of them had been removed, no longer existed . . I searched for the original writer on the Examiner, Judy Byington, and all of her articles are gone . . I was able to find this copy of the article on a cache, so for the sake of trying to preserve a history of the article, I am posting it . . read it or not . . believe it or not . . it is information, and your choice what to do with it . . )

This
article was based on today's exclusive interview with Kevin Annett of
the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State on this
week's litigation in the Brussels Common Law Court of Justice. Five
judges and 27 jury members from six countries including the USA,
considered evidence on over 50,000 missing Canadian, US, Argentine and
European children who were suspected victims of an international child sacrificial cult referred to as the Ninth Circle.

Two adolescent women claimed that Pope Francis
raped them while participating in child sacrifices. Eight eyewitnesses
confirmed the allegations according to evidence presented this week at a
Brussels Common Law Court of Justice. The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice rituals were said to take place during the Springs of 2009 and 2010 in rural Holland and Belgium.

Pope Francis was also a perpetrator in satanic child
sacrifice rites while acting as an Argentine priest and Bishop
according to records obtained from the Vatican archives. A prominent
Vatican official and former Vatican Curia employee obtained the sealed
documents for use by the court. This was not the first time satanic
activities were suspected to be at the Vatican according to this ABC news story.

Another witness was set to testify that they were present during Pope
Francis' meetings with the military Junta during Argentine's 1970's
Dirty War. According to the witness, Pope Francis helped traffic
children of missing political prisoners into an international child
exploitation ring run by an office at the Vatican.

Evidence of a Catholic Jesuit Order document called the "Magisterial
Privilege" was presented in court by the Chief Prosecutor. The record
dated Dec. 25 1967 was said to show that every new Pope was required to
participate in Ninth Circle Satanic ritual sacrifices of newborn
children, including drinking their blood.

"Documents from Vatican secret archives presented to court clearly
indicate that for centuries the Jesuits had a premeditated plan to
ritually murder kidnapped newborn babies and then consume their blood,"
the Chief Prosecutor told the five international judges and 27 jury
members. "The plan was born of a twisted notion to derive spiritual
power from the lifeblood of the innocent, thereby assuring political
stability of the Papacy in Rome. These acts are not only genocidal but
systemic and institutionalized in nature. Since at least 1773, they
appear to have been performed by the Roman Catholic Church, Jesuits and
every Pope."

Two witnesses claimed that as children they were at child sacrifices
with the former Pope Joseph Ratzinger. Since at least 1962 Ratzinger
participated in child sacrifices as a member of the Knights of Darkness
according to the Vatican records presented at court. Ratzinger was an
S.S. Chaplain's assistant at the German Ravensbruck Concentration Camp
during World War II. The children to be killed were supplied from
prisoners at the death camp. The Nazi Waffen S.S. Division Knights of
Darkness was established by Hitler in 1933 and embraced ancient pagan
occult beliefs in human sacrifice.

Dutch Therapist-ritual abuse survivor Toos Nijenhuis testified of her witness to child sacrifice in this video.
"Survivors of these rituals describe newborn babies being chopped to
pieces on stone altars and their remains consumed by participants" the
Chief Prosecutor said."During the 1960's the survivor-witnesses were
forced to rape and mutilate other children and then cut their throats
with ceremonial daggers."

According to witnesses Pope Francis, former Pope Joseph Ratzinger,
Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Pachon and Anglican Archbishop of
Canterbury Justin Welby were participants in the Ninth Circle Satanic
child sacrifice cult rape and killing of children. Evidence also could
link to cult ceremonies UK High Court Justice Judge Fulford, members of
the British Royal Family including Prince Phillip, Dutch Cardinal
Alfrink, Dutch Queen Wilhemina, her family and consort King Hendrick,
Belgian Royals and Bilderberger founder Crown Prince Bernhard.

Documentation of The Canada Gazette Issue No. 232, December 26
1942, Ottawa was also presented to court. Evidently and unfortunately,
the Canadian government and Privy Council Office in London granted to
the Dutch royals, exception from all criminal, civil and military
jurisdiction. What would make these global leaders exempt from justice?

The Chief Prosecutor presented alleged links between the British, Dutch
and Belgian royal families to disappearances of Mohawk children at
Canada's Church of England's Brantford Ontario Indian residential
school. In 2008 a child mass gravesite was discovered at the Mohawk
School. An ITCCS dig by archeologists was shut down when remains of a
small child was uncovered.

Since then over 30 child mass grave sites
have been located at Indian residential schools across Canada. The
Catholic and Anglican Churches, United Church of Canada, Canadian
government and Crown of England have refused ITCCS' repeated requests
for excavation of the mass grave sites.

"This week conclusive evidence was presented that the Catholic Church is
perpetrating ongoing crimes against children," the Chief Prosecutor
stated. "The Catholic Church is the world's largest corporation and
appears to be in collusion with governments, police and courts
worldwide."

The Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult was said to operate at
Roman Catholic cathedrals in Montreal, New York, Rome and London
according to evidence filed in court. Witnesses claimed child sacrifices
took place at Carnarvon Castle in Wales, an undisclosed French Chateau
and at Canadian Catholic and Anglican Indian residential schools in
Kamloops, British Columbia and Brantford, Ontario. The Ninth Circle
Satanic child sacrifice cult was believed to use privately owned forest
groves in the US, Canada, France and Holland.

Yesterday the five international magistrates adjourned court for two
weeks and considered continuing in closed sessions. This week's closed
court was held in an undisclosed location due to notification that the
Vatican had released a Jesuit "hit squad" to disrupt proceedings.

For those
of you familiar with the White Hats Reports, you’re aware that we have
suspended publishing reports, and more importantly, failed to release
report #48 as promised. I have been asked about that on numerous
occasions in the recent weeks and months and feel perhaps I should
address it here.

Our
objective with these reports was primarily to continue the exposure of
the withholding of the World Global Settlements (WGS) funds, the Wanta
Funds, the CMKX debacle and the various other financial frauds
perpetrated by the cabal on well meaning individuals. The primary focus
was to let the cabal know that we KNEW and also to connect some dots for
others (law enforcement, world leaders, etc) in the optimistic sense
that they would respond in some positive way. Informing the general
public at large was secondary to the main objective.

History
will dictate whether the reports have had or will have any effect on the
cabal’s stranglehold on humanity. I sincerely hope they do but I may
not live to see that day. Our intent was always to expose the fraudulent
financial system as it is the foundation for the cabal’s control of our
lives. We are/were not partisan in any way as we exposed both parties
in the US political arena in addition to cabalists in other countries.
Our agenda was simple… to put pressure on the cabal and others in the
desire to see change occur for the good of the people and all humanity.

As our
readership grew, we began to see a change in the way we were perceived.
It appeared that some were under the impression that we were constantly
stating opinions and not reporting facts. This was and still is, amusing
to us, as the complete lack of knowledge and understanding of the
“game” did not prevent many from voicing opinions based on… their
opinion. As I stated previously, the objective of the reports was not to
convince the public of their authenticity but to put pressure on the
cabal.

From the
beginning, we were getting feedback through various sources that our
reports were hitting the mark in terms of getting the attention of both
the cabal and world leaders all around the globe. The exposure was
constant and steady and in most cases, in real time as some reports
detailed events that had occurred a day or two prior. All the while we
were walking a fine line between exposing the truth and exposing
operatives who risked everything to get us the information. In so doing,
we had to keep in mind the method of exposure had to protect the
ongoing flow of future information by not revealing the sources and/or
methods.

I suppose
the birth of report 48 occurred on February 16, 2012 when Lord David
James of Blackheath courageously stood up in the House of Lords and
delivered his speech exposing the $15 trillion dollar fraud perpetrated
by the Federal Reserve, the US secret government, the criminal banking
system and the corrupt politicians who are paid to look the other way
when we the people of the US are put further in debt to support the
slave status we’re all part of.

We then
issued two reports in the next week which detailed not only the
origination of our group but also included a copy of one of the SWIFTS
for authentication. (See White Hats report #36 and #37 at http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/).
The historic significance of this event, Lord James’ speech, cannot be
underestimated. For the first time, the very essence of the cabal’s
misdeeds, the financial system, was exposed for all to see. And what was
the response?

Total silence.

Not one
mainstream media outlet reported on the story. Not one investigation was
started to look into the matter as Lord James implored his colleagues
to do. And not one peep from the public for demanding an investigation
and response to why $15 trillion of their money that happened to get
transferred overseas to some obscure entity named Pureheart Investments,
LTD.

Not one.

We had
begun investigating Pureheart before Lord James’ historic speech in the
House of Lords but once reports 36 and 37 were released, we were deluged
with various individuals and entities reaching out to us in an effort
to assist in the exposure of the real story behind Pureheart. Out of
this, report #48 was born. The deeper we went down the trail, the more
bizarre and mind blowing it became. For us, who’ve seen our share of
bizarre and mind blowing, it was something deeper… more sinister, than
we’ve ever experienced. Through this process, we were able to gather
documents and information which related to Pureheart’s formation,
history, alliances, key players and most important of all, their
objectives. This set us on a path that took us out of the realm of the
financial system and into the world of black projects, secret deals with
foreign countries touted by the whore media to be our enemies, advanced
technology and alien contacts.

Bits and
pieces of this story had been exposed over the years. The Black Eagle
Trust, the Five Star Trust, the Russell Trust, Operation “Hammer”,
Yamashita’s Gold, and Confessions of an Economic Hitman are just a few
of the dots that could now be connected to the secret/shadow government.
As we investigated the origins, we were able to follow it through to
the present day and Pureheart.

Pureheart
is the conduit for pilfering money out of the financial system and
taking it down that dark hole into the abyss, only to resurface in
several different places, all for the advancement of the cabal’s control
over humanity. Black projects, false flags, payoffs and bribes to
politicians and public officials, blackmail, murder, assassination,
satanic rituals, agreements with off-worlders and numerous and ongoing
crimes against humanity. The denial of access to the secret technology
that the masses pay for but the cabal utilizes in order to better
control us and systematically take away our sovereign rights.

The
origins of Pureheart trace back to GOT, SA (Global Oil Traders), two
Saudi kings, Lucky Luciano and the five originators of the secret
government (hence, the Five Star Trust) Bush, Sr., Edward Lansdale,
William Colby, Roberto Ferrara aka Lorin Rosier and Richard Armitage.
Ferrera faking his own death and recreated as Lorin Rossier, living in a
safe house in Europe with an underground tunnel system that allows him
to come and go without being surveilled. A corporate attorney (former)
of Pureheart who reached out to us giving us information and claiming
the cabal possessed technology advanced 10,000 years of what is in the
public domain.

A compelling story, to say the least.

Pureheart
is a GSE which stands for Government-Sponsored Enterprise. Other
examples of a GSE are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FICO. I guarantee if
you look up the purpose and function of GSEs, it won’t tell you that
they were created by Congress to steal trillions of dollars of US
taxpayer’s money for crimes against humanity. And that’s EXACTLY what
Pureheart does and has been doing for many years.

But I digress.

When we
assembled all the data… the notes of meetings, the joint venture
contracts with other countries, the various documents relating to
solicitations, the notes of conversations and the vetting of most of it,
we came to the conclusion that it would be a major expose’ of the
cabal. And I don’t use the term major lightly. Its one thing to talk or
write about it, it’s entirely another to provide proof in the form of
documents numbering in the hundreds of pages.

The
discussion of releasing 48 spanned several days and weeks with
consideration given to every conceivable response and repercussion. Pros
and cons weighed and debated… sometimes heatedly… before reaching the
conclusion in favor of delaying the release. We were fully cognizant of
putting many people in harm’s way, including ourselves. The vast number
of documents we received and contacts from information sources after
Lord James’ historic speech was truly overwhelming. The cons were first
and foremost our own safety and the safety of others involved directly
and indirectly. We could decide to jeopardize ourselves and our families
but we couldn’t make that decision for other people. Due to the nature
and extreme sensitivity of the documents, the list of
leakers/whistleblowers who assisted with this effort would be a very
short list, easily narrowed. Another factor on the con side of things
was the issue of possibly jeopardizing other phases of actions being
taken at the time and are ongoing. Another factor—I’m not sure whether
it’s pro or con—has to do with the fact that world leaders, politicians,
etc., already knew about most of the info contained in 48. So in that
regard, no new information would be provided other than perhaps some
details or deals that not all were aware of.

In my
mind, the apathy of the general public was the critical con factor that
made the decision not to publish 48 a no-brainer. It seems no one
thought… or understood… that the $15 Trillion fraud exposed by Lord
James in February of 2012 impacted every taxpaying Amerikan. Most don’t
know the Federal Reserve is a private corporation of cabal bankers that
make the rules for themselves in the banking world without limitations.
Most don’t understand that Federal income taxes are, in fact, interest
payments on the debt of the out of control government. Most don’t know
the dollar bills in their pockets are not cash but debt with the cabal
given the freewheeling authority to print dollars ad infinitum because
the Amerikan citizens are the collateral on the debt. Most don’t realize
the reason an illegal alien is allowed to hold the office of President
is because the US is a corporation and they have no such restrictions
(being a US citizen) on corporate officers. And most don’t realize that
the political parties are two sides of the same coin and have long ago
sold us out to their financial contributors and corporate benefactors.

And even
the ones who know all of the above are not doing enough. Just knowing
isn’t enough… action needs to be taken or nothing will change. Perhaps
it hasn’t dawned on everyone that the cavalry isn’t coming, the ET’s
aren’t going to intervene and save us and no religious idols/icons are
going to wave their hands and all will be good again.

The
deafening silence after Lord James’ speech was evidence that our
reports, at least from the reading public’s standpoint, had become
nothing more than episodes in an ongoing drama serial that were mere
entertainment. Like a Robert Ludlum spy novel or a Jerry Bruckheimer
action movie.

If your
house is on fire and you’ve been informed it’s on fire and you do
nothing about it, what’s the point of having a smoke detector?

Now… this
is not to say that at some appropriate point in time in the future, 48
won’t be released. Every precaution has been taken to preserve both the
integrity of the report and security of the documents. I have been
informed that our reports have made an impact and changes are occurring
for the better as a result. Personally, I see very little sign of that
but I remain hopeful. I do know the cabal has been seriously challenged
on their plans and agenda but I’m not convinced we’re going to be any
better off trading one type of tyranny for another.

Apologies
are extended to those of our readers who were not given an explanation
after the ill advised and ill conceived publicity and build up
surrounding the release of report 48. Hopefully this will put the issue
to rest, at least for the time being. However, I’ll provide this link to
a report one of our colleagues put out that gives an overview of what
we discovered. There are hundreds of pages of documents that back up the
information contained in this report.

On the 16th of February, 2012, in the House of Lords, one courageous
man, akin to Churchill attempting alone to warn of the Nazis threat to
peace, Lord James of Blackheath, showed the vision, integrity, and
fortitude to stand up, be counted, and expose to the House of Lords, the
stark evidence of Global Fraud, which he so eloquently stated “there
may have been a massive piece of money-laundering committed by a major
Government who should know better.” Also, in his words, “a major
American department has an agency which has gone rogue.” This is a scam
of major size and a key to the recovery of the money needed to
immediately boost America’s economy, stabilize the EU and fund the
Global Settlements.

Lord David James of Blackheath

Lord James invited The House of Lords to assess the implications of his
concerns and requested a full inquiry. While MI6 played around the
edges, focused Treasury minds have still not commenced with the thorough
investigation needed, nor has the UK Treasury or Foreign Office
stood-up and sought to establish the truth. Lord Sassoon missed the
whole point by passing it off with a presumption that, if the Gold
claimed was bogus, it was just a scam from Wilfredo Saurin. He
purposely overlooked the real issue; money raised against gold that does
not exist is fraudulent. Sassoon should know that grandstanding can
make or break careers.

The consequences of what Noble Lord James was seeking to expose are far
reaching. He was offering a key to the Pandora’s Box of the
uncontrolled Cabal and corrupt US agency, with activities carried out
not in the interests of Sovereign protection, but for the usurping
interests of corrupt banking, political and agency greed. The extent of
the fraud may be too great for State Agency staff to understand, as
Sassoon has shown by failing to look into it, so perhaps someone needs
to help them all understand our real dangers and risks. This may help a
significant group of international leaders and governments to finally
grasp what has been and still is happening. What follows will expand
consciousness of this very nasty reality to focus on the key issues and
to assist prosecution.

The “agency” Lord James previously raised concerns about in the House of
Lords, which he prudently referred to as Foundation X, is in fact the
Pureheart Investment operation run by General Lorin William Rossier and
assisted by dubious Chief Attorney Marlon McCall. This “agency” is
claimed by McCall to be a subsidiary of Homeland Security, a fact
supported by the UN and Homeland codes interjected into their SWIFT
transfers for the identified 15 Trillion USD raised by FRAUD, with no
Congressional awareness, oversight or permission. Why is the US
Congress not getting this? 15T USD was heisted on YOUR watch
Congressman Issa! Where is our Standards Committee now?

Lord James had originally been approached by Marlon McCall, in turn
linked with Sandip Goyal and the notorious Asian Con Man Wilfredo
Saurin, with dual intent.

Wilfredo Saurin

On one hand, they were seeking to offer a too-good-to-be-true 6 billion
pounds loan to Her Majesty’s Government, which they had on deposit at
HSBC. They also sought Lord James’ assistance to get HSBC and others to
acknowledge the 15T USD, which had been wired previously by JP Morgan,
on behalf of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, via HSBC, for further
credit to the Royal Bank of Scotland, for the Pureheart account, now
sequestrated by rogue RBS bankers. Poetic justice prevails, as scammers
got scammed by the Bankers.

The LWR, GOT S.A., and Pureheart Investments, appears to be a vehicle
operated in conjunction with the US Fed, Treasury, and selective US
Agencies, with even UN complicity as shown by the attached SWIFTS. All
these entities were cross-compromised by McCall having spent eight weeks
in the hospital, preventing the Agency from playing its full role in
the US Debt ceiling crisis in August 2011, where the 15T USD debt
shortfall was miraculously solved out of thin air utilizing this
fraudulent operation.

Pureheart is an unregulated and covert operation of the US Government,
with possible links to the Revenue Sustainability Fund (RSF), which
funds should have been utilized by the Fed /Treasury to prepare the way
for the imminent Global Settlements, which continue to be blocked by the
self-interests of the Rothschild’s, Bush’s, and the Heritage Funds.
These funds, once released, would help prepare the way for the critical
and necessary re alignment of all major global trading currencies, but
most importantly, the consolidation of substantial sovereign debts owed.
The world’s biggest problem is lack of economic stability, which we can
begin to solve by taking this money and paying the Settlements.

In some areas the RSF has been using Pureheart for several years as a
means of clandestinely distributing large volumes of dollars into
sovereign economies as a means of maintaining the image of stability.
However, this has been a double edged sword, which will be addressed
later.

What took place was, in effect, a massive money laundering scheme. The
US Treasury had run dry, so they defrauded the global monetary system by
illegally creating additional money, which was subsequently stolen. WE
NEED TO DEMAND THIS MONEY BACK AND PAY THE GLOBAL SETTLEMENTS. There
is enough incriminating evidence to hold them all accountable. The
scale of collusion defies belief, yet it happened and still continues.
Congress and the House of Lords need to establish a Joint Task Force to
immediately recover this money, and in one swift action, rebalance the
world’s economies.

Pureheart functions with no direct oversight and with investigating
parties being told “hands off” by key Central Banks, the Treasury, and
by major intel agencies. In an operation created by Pureheart,
utilizing the notorious Wilfredo Saurin, the well-known international
fraudster; a scam was set up to wire a total of 15T USD in three
separate tranches of five trillion dollar SWIFT transfers from the
Federal Reserve to the account of LWR, GOT S.A., Pureheart Investment to
HSBC London, for further credit to Royal Bank of Scotland Global Plc.
The attached SWIFT transfers and confirmations reveal the smoking gun,
including the SWIFT regarding the bogus gold. This was a very
sophisticated cross-agency and bank criminal operation known and
colluded to at the highest level. All the money can be traced.

On the 20th of April 2009, the first tranche of five trillion
dollars was wired using USD SWIFT transfer N: 400930153. The onward
transfer from RBS to RBS Group used SWIFT transfer No: 8163708748 with
confirmatory tracking and onward SEQUE 851962 at 4.53pm.

On the 27th of April 2009, the second tranche of five trillion
dollars was made USD SWIFT Transfer No 4319901756. Confirmatory tracking
SEQUE 924573 at 1.28pm.

On the 4th of May 2009, the third tranche of five trillion USD SWIFT
Transfer No 1186308258. Confirmatory tracking and onward SEQUE 259043
at 2.14pm

On the 11th of May 2009, a 50 billion Euro transfer was made by
SWIFT Transfer No: 4027105584. Confirmatory tracking and transfer SEQUE
275903 at 2.25pm. (This was later to be pursued for release from HSBC
by no other than the Fed Chairman himself coming out of the woodwork.)

April 20, 2009

Now, an interesting scenario occurred when they transferred this
“created money,” where asset backing was needed to balance the books.
They realized they had a serious compliance shortfall problem backing up
the history of funds. They needed to cook-the-books fast to give a
credible asset to justify raising the cash. So, on the 20th of May
2009, operating in conjunction with Wilfredo Saurin, they wired SKR’s
(Safekeeping Receipts) from the Bank of Indonesia (BI) for an alleged
gold bullion transfer of 750,000 metric tons. It was of course bogus
and fraudulent. Attached is the issued SWIFT Transfer No 4200754365.
Confirmatory tracking and transfer SEQUE 194743 was also issued at 10:21
am. You will discover coincidentally from the BI SWIFTS, the sum
amounts to the 15T USD needed to underpin the US Fed fraud.

This was all predicated by Saurin against the back up account of
Yohannes Riyadi, which only holds 700 metric tons of gold, and can never
be moved. We have and hold copies of the real Bank of Indonesia
custodial records and full Deputy President Confirmation of Riyadi’s
account on a special Fed Bank of Indonesia sub platform. Saurin has
operated against Riyadi’s account for years, entrusted by Riyadi to act
responsibly, but Saurin has caused him untold damage. The entire chain
of this money was a lie, a fraud, and a scam. This means that 15T USD
of falsely created money has been issued, traded, and laundered through
the banking system making huge profits. To whose benefit? How much
profit was made and where is it now? We want it back with taxes levied,
and in good hands helping the world.

The Fed’s accompanying instructions for the transfer of these funds, all
personally authorized by Mr. Benjamin Bernanke, included instructions
to utilize part Euro funds already lodged with HSBC for the Pureheart
account. This was the delay in processing this 50 Billion Euro portion
of the transfers, perhaps “fees for the boys,” which caused Mr. Bernanke
to fly to the UK and personally walk through the execution of this
transfer. This may possibly have been with the knowledge of Lord
Stephen Green, who was the Chairman of HSBC at that time. Euro funds
later appeared, perhaps as pay offs, in the accounts of fraudsters
Sandip Goyal and Wilfredo Saurin for assisting in executing this fraud.

When challenged about Saurin’s role, and imminent risk of arrest for his many scams, Marlon
McCall openly stated that Wilfredo Saurin is a Federal Reserve Bank of
New York protected agent, and will not be arrested as he is being
protected by Homeland Security and the Fed as a managed agent. That
explains a lot! Anyone issuing fraudulent US dollars is
typically tracked down anywhere on the planet by the US, yet Saurin is
always the Teflon man. On one hand, Saurin appears on Fed warning
sites, including many Asian media warnings of his many crimes and fee
scams; but on the other hand, the FED deals and colludes with him. What
shameful duplicity.

The deal offered by Pureheart to the UK to try to get these funds repatriated was as follows:

One third was to go to the US Treasury.

One third was to go to Pureheart. To whom and for what purpose?

One third was to go to the UK for “services rendered in providing shelter for these funds for two years.”

There has been a systematic failure by collective authorities to address
this issue. Since obstructionist cover-ups continue, we must do the
following immediately:

Seize back the first one third with five trillion USD right now for US economic needs

Give nothing to Pureheart, and instead the second 5 Trillion USD comes back to the US

Use the last third to stabilize the UK and the EU

Identify the vast profits which will have now been made from these
funds, recover it, and pay the Private and Global Settlements.

Set up a Congressional Task Force and go after this money

This week, the walking wounded lame duck Royal Bank of Scotland, which
assisted in fronting this fraud, is repaying its government bailout loan
of 163 billion pounds (think 250 billion USD). The Bank only made a
declared trading profit of 1.2 billion pounds. This is ‘Madoff Style’
accounting. So clearly, vast amounts are hidden ‘Off Balance Sheet’ for
one set of books, and ‘On Balance Sheet’ for another. The US Fed, US
Treasury, UK Treasury, and Bank of England need to set up an URGENT recovery team to find this money. Her Majesty’s Government holds the key to unlocking and exposing this vast fraud.

McCall was crying - the Brits had frozen him out. What a turn around.
For almost a century the Fed Scammers raided the planet, and now the
Brits have pulled their pants down for 15T USD.

This 15T USD would easily have made over 50T USD in inter-bank trading.
Look at the taxes missed on those profits – approximately 20 Trillion
USD. The RBS Board is liable for criminal prosecution as are many
others. The Bank of Indonesia has serious questions to answer here as
well. JP Morgan helped initiate this Fed scam and HSBC helped launder
it. We call for a joint Congressional, UK Lords, and Treasury Task
Force to go after it all. In one swoop, we stabilize the EU, UK and US
economies. Once released, the Global Settlement money will go towards
funding infrastructure projects, creating jobs, increasing revenues, and
reducing crime, thus reducing despair, creating hope and providing
opportunity. Wilfredo Saurin and Sandip Goyal are flagged on many
sites. Why do they have HSBC and Credit Suisse Bank accounts? Who
cleared them?

TO OUR LEADERS: DO THE JOBS YOU WERE
ELECTED TO DO! GET THIS MONEY BACK NOW! STOP TALKING, START ACTING.
IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THE ROGUES INVOLVED.

Sunday, April 20, 2014

April 4, 2014Vincent Freeman is a molecular
biologist and artificial intelligence scientist who has worked on
classified programs at some of the top-50 defense contractors. He has
also conducted genetic and biological analysis for the National
Institutes of Health (NIH). Vincent is currently volunteering his time
as a senior consultant to the Carnicom Institute, a non-profit research
organization whose goal is to identify and expose covert geo-engineering
and bio-engineering. Vincent will discuss his current project that
involves 'reverse-engineering' the fundamental structural biology
involved in the 'chemtrails' pathogen. He is working closely with
Clifford Carnicom to accomplish this task. Vincent will explain the
biological evidence they have and explain the eerie properties of cross
domain bacteria, a type of genetically engineered bacteria/nanomachine.
In the second hour, we'll discuss Morgellons disease and how the
population is already exposed and infected regardless of whether they
have symptoms or not. He explains how infection can be proven via
multiple scientific methods and what can be done to inhibit Morgellons
growth. Also, Vincent discusses where CI is going in terms of research.
Later, we discuss the evidence of covert bio-engineering and
nanotechnology and how it works, as well as how these factors might play
into the trans-humanist agenda.

Recreating The Resurrection

The Resurrection Mural, is a 40 foot by 12 foot oil on canvas mural by acclaimed artist, Ron DiCianni.
Commissioned by The Museum of Biblical Art, this mural took over two
years to create and involved movie studios to make a life size tomb,
family members to assist with costumes for the models, and countless
hours of prayer.

While the mural itself is breathtakingly beautiful, its
purpose goes much deeper than just merely art. The Resurrection of Jesus
Christ is the single most important occurrence in human history. This
mural brings people in and lets them experience the moment in which
Christ conquered the grave and stepped out of the tomb.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Saturday, April 19, 2014

The BioInitiative Working Group says evidence for health risk from
wireless tech is growing stronger and warrants immediate action. The
Group released a mid-year update covering new science studies from 2012
to 2014.

New studies intensify medical concerns about malignant brain tumors from
cell phone use. “There is a consistent pattern of increased risk for
glioma (a malignant brain tumor) and acoustic neuroma with use of mobile
and cordless phones” says Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD at Orebro
University, Sweden, according to studies released in 2012 and 2013.
“Epidemiological evidence shows that radiofrequency should be classified
as a known human carcinogen. The existing FCC/IEEE and ICNIRP public
safety limits are not adequate to protect public health.”

The BioInitiative reports nervous system effects in 68% of studies on
radiofrequency radiation (144 of 211 studies) in 2014. This has
increased from 63% in 2012 (93 of 150 studies) in 2012. Studies of
extremely-low frequency radiation are reported to cause nervous system
effects in 90% of the 105 studies available in 2014. Genetic effects
(damage to DNA) from radiofrequency radiation is reported in 65% (74 of
114 studies); and 83% (49 of 59 studies) of extremely-low frequency
studies.

Mobile
wireless devices like phones and tablets are big sources of unnecessary
biological stress to the mind and body that can chip away at resilience
over time. The Report warns against wireless in schools. Schools
should provide internet access without Wi-Fi.

"It is essentially an unregulated experiment on children's health and
learning. Microwave from wireless tech disrupts thinking – what could be
worse for learning? Technology can be used more safely with wired
devices that do not produce these biologically-disruptive levels of
microwave radiation" said Cindy Sage, Co-Editor of the BioInitiative
Report.

Government reviews on health impacts of wireless radiofrequency
radiation from the European Union and Australia continue to be
inconclusive largely because they require certainty before issuing
warnings. The FCC review of health impacts from wireless technologies
is still underway, but has not affected the federal push for wireless
classrooms.

(this is a very well done and simple explanation of the predicament we are in, and really the ultimate answer to it . . many people, including me, realizes that so much/all of the laws, actions and beaurocracies being used against the people are unconstitutional . . but do not really know "why" or "how" they are unconstitutional. . . . as well as the snakes everywhere who put themselves out there as "patriotic" and "conservative" on the radio, tv, etc, and get a following (Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Mark Levine, etc, etc) that ultimately are working for the globalists, whether they realize it or not . . the answer is to NOT CHANGE the Constitution, but to enforce it . . which would eliminate practically ALL of the tyranny . . simple, but very, very difficult . . . )

For
100 years, the federal government has usurped powers not delegated to
it in our Constitution.

What
should we do about it? Should we reclaim our existing
Constitution and put an end to the usurpations?

Or should
we “modernize”the Constitution by delegating to the federal
government the powers it has usurped – so as to legalize what is
now unconstitutional?

Mark
Levin begins “The Liberty Amendments” by saying he doesn’t
believe the Constitution requires “modernization through amendments”.
But he then proposes a series of amendments, six of which modernize our
Constitution to delegate to the federal government most of the
powers it has usurped during the last 100 years.

And
each of his six amendments does the opposite of what its title promises
.I’ll show you.[1]

Levin’s
amendment to “limit the federal bureaucracy” [p 99-100 of
his book]

George
Washington’s cabinet had four members: Secretary of State, Secretary
of War, Secretary of the Treasury, and Attorney General. Those functions
are authorized by our Constitution.[2]

But
today there are numerous agencies in the Executive Branch of the federal
government. Where is the constitutional authority? What Article, Section,
and Clause authorizes the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy,
Labor, Transportation, HHS, HUD, DHS, EPA, SBA, etc., etc., etc.?

There
is no constitutional authority! Accordingly, all these agencies are unconstitutional
as outside the scope of the powers delegated in our Constitution.

Well
then, a person who wanted to “limit the federal bureaucracy”
would demand that these agencies be closed,and their functions returned
to the States and The People, right?

But
Mark Levin doesn’t do this. Section1 of his amendment legalizes
all these agencies.It says:

“All
federal departments and agencies shall expire if said departments and
agencies are not individually reauthorized in stand-alone reauthorization
bills every three years by a majority vote of the House of Representatives
and the Senate.”

As long
as Congress periodically “reauthorizes” the agencies–
they remain.

Levin’s
amendment thus changes the constitutional standard for whether an executive
agency lawfully exists from whether it carries out an enumerated
power [as in Washington’s Cabinet] to whatever the President
wants and Congress agrees to. Do you see?

Now
look at Section 2 of Levin’s amendment to “limit the federal
bureaucracy.” It says:

“All
Executive Branch regulations exceeding an economic burden of $100 million,
as determined jointly by the Government Accountability Office and the
Congressional Budget Office, shall be submitted to a permanent Joint
Committee of Congress, hereafter the Congressional Delegation Oversight
Committee, for review and approval prior to their implementation.”

Article
I, §1, of our Constitution says only Congress may
make laws.[3]
But since Woodrow Wilson, executive agencies in the federal government
have been churning out regulations which govern all aspects of our lives.
These comprise the now gigantic Code of Federal Regulations.

All
these regulations are unconstitutional as in violation of Art. I, §1![4]

Well
then, one would expect that a person who wanted to “limit the federal
bureaucracy” would demand the repeal of existing regulation sand
an end to all future rulemaking, right?

Not
Levin!Section2 of his amendment legalizes all existing regulations
and the rule making process. Levin’s “fix”
is merely to form a congressional committee to review certain regulations
before they are imposed on the American People.

And
so,federal executive agencies will continue to churn out millions of pages
of regulations – but now, they will be constitutional
because Levin’s amendment makes it all lawful.

Do you
see? Levin’s amendment legalizes the status quo and does
the opposite of what he claims.

Levin’s
amendment “to limit federal spending”(p 73 -74)

Our
Constitution limits federal spending to the enumerated powers.
If you go through the Constitution and highlight the powers delegated
to Congress or the President, you will have a complete list of the objects
on which Congress may lawfully spend money. That is how our
Framers controlled federal spending. It is the enumerated
powers which limit spending – not the amount of revenue
the federal government generates or the size of the GDP.Do you see?

The
reason we have a crushing debt is because for 100 years, the federal government
has ignored the limits –already set forth in the Constitution -
on its spending.

Well
then, a person who wanted to “limit federal spending” would
demand that Congress begin to downsize the federal government and restrict
spending to the enumerated powers, right?

But
Levin doesn’t do this. Section 1 of his amendment legalizes
all the spending which is now unconstitutional as outside the enumerated
powers. It says:

“Congress
shall adopt a preliminary fiscal year budget no later than the first
Monday in May for the following fiscal year, and submit said budget
to the President for consideration.”

Levin’s
amendment thus legalizes the unconstitutional status quo where the President
and Congress adopt a “budget” and spend money on whatever
they put in the budget! Levin would permit Congress and the President
to lawfully spend money on whatever they
want – spending which is now unlawful because our Constitution
doesn’t authorize it.

Furthermore,
Levin’s amendment does nothing to control
federal spending. While Sections 3 & 4 of his amendment pretend to
limit spending to revenues or to a percentage of the GDP; Sections6 &
7 permit Congress to suspend the spending limit and continue to raise
the national debt.[5]

Levin’s
amendment “to limit federal taxing” (p 75)

Our
Constitution doesn’t permit the federal government to levy taxes
so that Congress and the President will have the funds to spend on whatever
they want.

“The
Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defense and
general Welfare of the United States …” [and] “To
borrow Money on the credit of the United States;”

Immediately
after clauses 1 & 2 follows the list of enumerated powers
we delegated to Congress for the Country at Large.[6]

Add
to this short list of enumerated powers, the “housekeeping
powers” itemized elsewhere in the Constitution (e.g., the census);
the salaries authorized by Art. I, §6, cl. 1; Art.II, §1, next
to last clause; Art. III, §1, cl. 1, and others on the civil list;
and you see the purposes for which Congress is authorized to levy
and collect taxes, borrow money, and spend money, for the Country at Large.[7]

So!
Congress should not be levying taxes except to generate revenue
for its constitutional functions. If Congress restricted
its spending to those few powers delegated in the Constitution, the federal
government would need very little money from us.

One
would expect that a person who wants to“limit federal taxation”
would demand that the federal government stop taxing to raise money to
spend on unconstitutional purposes, right?

Not
Levin! While his amendment limits the federal income tax to 15% of income
– it institutionalizes the present practice where Congress lays
& collects taxes for any purposes whatsoever.[8]

Levin’s
amendment “to protect private property” (p 137)

The
federal governmenthas no lawful authority to own land
for any purpose other than those enumerated in the Constitution: Article
I, §8, next to last clause, permits the federal government to own
the District of Columbia [which was not to exceed “ten Miles square”],
and Places purchased with the Consent of the State legislatures for the
erection of forts, dock-Yards, and other needful buildings (e.g., federal
courthouses, post offices) to carry out the enumerated powers.

The
federal government has no lawful authority to own national parks,
grazing areas, forests, and such.[9]

And
the federal government has no lawful authority to restrict peoples’
use of their own land. Now here in our Constitution did we delegate that
power to the federal government! Accordingly, all federal laws and regulations
(EPA,etc.) which pretend to restrict an owner’s use of his land
are unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated.

Furthermore,
the States’ and local governments’ powers
of eminent domain and other “takings” of private land are
addressed in their own State Constitutions and laws. This
is NOT a federal issue!

But
Levin’s amendment “to protect private property” changes
all of the above. It says:

“When
any governmental entity acts not to secure a private property right
against actions that injure property owners, but to take property for
a public use from a property owner by actual seizure or through regulation,
which taking results in a market value reduction of the property, interference
with the use of the property, or a financial loss to the property owner
exceeding $10,000, the government shall compensate fully said property
owner for such losses.”

Levin’s
amendment:

Changes
the constitutional standard for federal ownership of lands from
carrying out an enumerated powerto what ever someone
in the federal government deems a “public use”
[which can be anything];

Legalizes
what are now unconstitutional holdings of lands by the federal government
– such as grazing lands;

Legalizes
“takings” by regulation – restrictions via regulations
on the use of private lands - by all levels of government;

Takes
from the States and The People their retained powers over eminent domain
and regulatory takings, and makes it a federal issue under the control
of the federal government;[10]
and

Provides
that as long as a taking does not reduce the value of the property
by more than $10,000, the governments don’t have to pay the property
owner one red cent. So! If your local or State or federal government
takes some of your land, or restrict its use by regulation,Levin’s
amendment requires compensation to be paid if the “taking”
exceeds $10,000. If the government decides that your loss is less than
$10,000, you eat the loss. The amendment legalizes government
theft of private property.

Levin’s
amendment “to protect the vote” (p 183-184)

Before
our Constitution was ratified, the States qualified & registered voters.
Qualifications were set forth in their State Constitutions, and requirements
differed from State to State. This power was expressly retained
by the States with Art. I, §2, cl. 1, U.S. Constitution.[11]

The
four voting amendments reduced this retained power of the States, and
delegated to the federal government power to stop States from
denying suffrage to citizens on account of race (15th Amendment),
sex (19th Amendment), failure to pay a tax (24th Amendment),
or age for citizens eighteen years of age or older (26th
Amendment).

Except
as restricted by these four amendments, the States retain their pre-existing
power to set qualifications for registering citizens to vote, as long
as they do not deny it on account of race, sex, failure
to pay a tax, or age for those 18 years or more. States remain free to
deny registration on other grounds –
such as conviction of a felony or illiteracy. And of course, States retained
power to restrict voting to citizens!

But
the retained powers of the States to set voter qualifications for registration
were diminished far beyond the scope of the amendments, due to usurpations
by the federal government, and because the States forgot that
they retained at Art. I, §2, cl. 1 most of their original power to
qualify & register voters.

So!
What should we do about non-citizens voting? Here is a novel idea: The
States should man up and reclaim their powers retained by Art.
I, §2, cl. 1; tell Eric Holder to take a hike; require all
currently registered voters to provide proof of citizenship; and refuse
to register new voters unless they provide proof of citizenship. Enforce
the Constitution we have!

But
Section 1 of Levin’s amendment “to protect the vote”
says:

“Citizens
in every state, territory, and the District of Columbia shall produce
valid photographic identification documents demonstrating evidence of
their citizenship, issued by the state government for the state in which
the voter resides, as a requirement for registering to vote and voting
in any primary or general election for President, Vice President, and
members of Congress.”

Levin’s
amendment (it has 5 Sections) rewards the federal
government for unlawfully forbidding States from requiring applicants
to prove they are citizens, by transferring more power over voter qualifications
& registration to the federal government.[10]

But
Levin’s amendment does even more harm than vesting in the federal
government a power it already usurped - it ushers in a national
ID card. Who thinks the feds won’t dictate the contents of the card
and keep copies? [Do you really think a national ID card is a
great idea?]

To add
insult to injury, Levin’s amendment doesn’t even prohibit
non-citizens from voting – it merely requires citizens
to get an ID card before they can register to
vote. Non-citizens are not required to get ID cards. The supreme Court
(which will now lawfully have judicial power over this issue)
will decide whether aliens can vote.

Levin’s
amendment “to promote free enterprise” (p 117)

In Federalist
No. 22 (4th para) and Federalist
No. 42 (11th&12th paras), Hamilton & Madison explain the original
intent of the “interstate commerce” clause: It is to prohibit
States from imposing tolls &tariffs on articles of merchandize as
they are transported through the States for purposes of buying and selling.
Until the mid-1930’s, this was widely understood. Here is a
full proof of the original intent of that clause and the story of
how the supreme Court usurped power over interstate commerce.

The
original intent of that clause is still the supreme Law of the Land![12]
So the States must man up and enforce that original
intent. They must ignore - nullify - all pretended federal laws, regulations,and
judicial opinions which are contrary to that original intent.

Levin’s
amendment “to promote free enterprise” says:

“SECTION
1: Congress’ power to regulate Commerce is not a plenary grant
of power to the federal government to regulate and control economic
activity but a specific grant of power limited to preventing states
from impeding commerce and trade between and among the several states.”

“SECTION
2: Congress’s power to regulate Commerce does not extend to activity
within a state, whether or not it affects interstate commerce; nor does
it extend to compelling an individual or entity to participate in commerce
or trade.”

Section
1 broadens the powers of the federal government from
prohibiting States from imposing tolls &tariffs on articles of merchandize
as they are transported through the States for purposes of buying and
selling, to prohibiting the States from doing
anything which “impedes” commerce and trade
between and among the States.

Many
things can be said to “impede” commerce and trade. And who
will decide what “impedes” and what doesn’t “impede”?
Five judges on the supreme Court.

Section
2 mentions two instances where Congress’ power to regulate Commerce
does not extend. This is dangerous because of the legal
maxim, Expressio
Unius Est Exclusio Alterius (the expression of one thing is the exclusion
of the other).

Accordingly,
Congress’ power to regulate commerce would extend to other instances.
Which ones? We don’t know - the supreme Court will decide –
on a case by case basis.

Conclusion

Levin’s
amendments legalize - make constitutional - the very abuses they purport
to correct, nullify the natural rights of the people, and fundamentally
change the constitutional design.

Even
though our Constitution is not being enforced, it still declares this
federal government lawless! The true rule of law is still on our side,
but not for much longer if we foolishly allow our Constitution to be re-written.

Endnotes:

1.
Telling the Truth about a person’s proposals isn’t “demonizing”
him. People angrily reject valid criticism of Levin’s proposals
because they have made an idol of him. If their loyalty were
to Truth - instead of to their idol - they would want to be set straight.2.
Article II, §2, and:

“…the
power ‘to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to
pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare
of the United States,’ amounts to an unlimited commission to exercise
every power which may be alleged to be necessary for the common defense
or general welfare.”

“Had
no other enumeration or definition of the powers of the Congress been
found in the Constitution, than the general expressions just cited, the
authors of the objection might have had some color for it…But what
color can the objection have, when a specification of the objects
alluded to by these general terms immediately follows, and is not even
separated by a longer pause than a semicolon? … Nothing is more
natural nor common than first to use a general phrase, and then to explain
and qualify it by a recital of particulars. But the idea of an
enumeration of particulars which neither explain nor qualify the general
meaning … is an absurdity…” [boldface mine]

So!Article
I, §8, cl.1 is merely a “general expression,” the meaning
of which is “ascertained and limited” by the clauses which
“immediately follow” it.In other words, clauses 1 & 2
grant to Congress the power to raise money; and clauses 3-16 enumerate
the objects on which Congress may appropriate the money so raised, thus
limiting clauses 1 & 2. Do you see?

8.
Levin’s amendment also corrects – on behalf of the feds -
the following: When the 16th Amendment was ratified, “income”
apparently didn’t include “wages.” Accordingly,
it would be unconstitutional to force people to pay “income”
taxes on “wages” - and such would thus be a proper object
of nullification by States. But Levin’s amendment legalizes the
status quo and rips this remedy from the States.9.
When our Constitution was ratified,the new federal government acquired
(from its predecessor) the Western Territory (Federalist
No. 7, 2nd & 3rd paras, and Federalist
No. 43 at 5.) over which the new federal government was delegated,
by Art. IV, §3, general legislative powers.As the Territory was broken
up into new States, the general legislative powers would expire and sovereignty
[except as to the few powers delegated exclusively to the new federal
government] would be transferred to the new State.10.Amendments to the Constitution generally increase the
powers of the federal government: They usher in implementing
federal statutes & executive agency regulations, and judicial power
over the issue is transferred to the federal courts. Art III, §2,
cl.1, says, “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases …
arising under this Constitution …” Do you really not see?11.
Article I, §2, cl. 1, says:

“The
House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second
Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in
each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the
most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.” [boldface
mine]

So!
Whoever votes in elections for their State House, is eligible to vote
for members of the federal House of Representatives. See also Federalist
No. 57 (5th para) & Federalist
No. 52 (2nd para).

12.
Article VI, cl. 2, the “supremacy clause”, states that only
our Constitution, federal laws made “in Pursuance”
of the Constitution, and Treaties made “under
the Authority of the United States”, shall be the supreme Law
of the Land. Supreme Court opinions are NEVER part of the supreme
Law of the Land! But we have wrongly made them the
only Law of our Land.

Publius Huldah
is a retired attorney who now lives in Tennessee. Before getting a
law degree, she got a degree in philosophy where she specialized in
political philosophy and epistemology (theories of knowledge). She
now writes extensively on the U.S. Constitution, using the Federalist
Papers to prove its original meaning and intent. She also shows how
federal judges and politicians have ignored Our Constitution and replaced
it with their personal opinions and beliefs.h E-Mail: publiushuldah@gmail.com

Sheeple

The Black Sheep tries to warn its friends with the truth it has seen, unfortunately herd mentality kicks in for the Sheeple, and they run in fear from the black sheep and keep to the safety of their flock.

Having tried to no avail to awaken his peers, the Black Sheep have no other choice but to unite with each other and escape the impending doom.

What color Sheep are you?

.

100627

Follow by Email

"Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" Galatians 4:16

Current Featured Video

Guy confronts George H. W. Bush: "Murderous, Zionist Piece Of Sh*t"

The Gulag Archipelago

In America, it's time to recall the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst; the cursed machine would have ground to a halt."

GEORGE ORWELL QUOTE FOR ALL TIMES

"At any given moment there is an orthodoxy, a body of ideas of which it is assumed that all right-thinking people will accept without question. It is not exactly forbidden to say this, that or the other, but it is not done to say it. Anyone who challenges the prevailing orthodoxy finds himself silenced with surprising effectiveness. A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing, either in the popular press or in the high-brow periodicals."
George Orwell, 1945

urupiper2 G+

The Dilemna

This blog hopefully will describe my journey toward being a full-time trader of futures contracts, mainly of the E-Mini S&P 500 futures contract (ES), and since August 2008, mainly the Euro/USD Currency Futures.

I have also lately decided (in Nov. 2008) to start posting mainly videos and commentary regarding my faith and world view of the rapid changes we as a country, and the world as a whole, have started to experience since our latest Presidential Election in the U.S