When Jim asked me to do this gig, he made it clear that I could touch on controversial issues but that he was principally looking for some techie/geeky/nerdy gossip or rocket science. So while I may get to the former outside of technological settings, here's a meager whiff of both at once in four parts. (Wnd with all the usual formalities that I have no financial interest in any of the companies to which I refer other than an online acquaintance with the creator of #1 as a longstanding user and customer.)

The best* VNC solution for MacOS X when connected remotely is...* With a few caveats (and bones thrown to both Apple and Microsoft...

1. Does your Mac sometimes seem to run out of memory?

I've owned a Mac since 2005, but I've been using UNIX full-time since about the thirteenth year in the Unix Epoch (about 1983). I bought myself an iBook/G4 for my 50th birthday on a whim but also because I was fed up with XP and Linux even if each got the job done in its own way.

And while my iBook/G4 is still running strong (though only with MacOS 10.5.x), I also acquired (OK, I won an online contest at MacWorld.) an Intel-based iMac around 2008 and have kept it updated with the latest OS (now Snow Leopard, 10.6.x). I've been very happy with my Macs (other than a hardware problem in the iMac last year that is a long story in its own right), and I and have largely stopped using Windows (other than on other family computers) and only use Ubuntu-flavored Linux on my late dad's machine when at my mother's house.

But here's the thing: All of these machines had shown a strange propensity to gobble up system memory over time. I don't have any exotic apps running -- mainly just browsers, mail, word processing, videos, music, etc. -- so why does memory disappear as reflected in the Activity Monitor even if I close all these apps?

I'm not going to get into the esoterica of virtual memory, MMUs (Memory Management Units), swap space, etc. Nor am I going to sing the praises of vanilla UNIX over Linux over MacOS X over Microsoft products. Nor am I going to tell one of the many headaches that we experienced over fifteen years of running a business helping people build distributed applications that ran 24/7 for 365 days a year (and no, they don't get Feb 29 off). I hope to write about this later in a more conceptual post about software robustness.

Simply put, your machine works in a "virtual" memory space that is bigger (much bigger) than the physical memory made of silicon chips. The electronic data in the CPU has to access data in the physical memory, so when that gets filled (or even gets close to that), your system automatically moves stuff onto pieces of the hard disk called "swap" ... and stuff is moving in and out of swap all the time.

Get it? And for now, here's a trick that readers with Macs might try if they have seen this phenomena and wonder what's up:

So, what's going on here? Well, the "du" command is for "disk utilization"; when you run it "normally", you get back the number of bytes being used on the device (so in this case, your main disk). The options "-sx" don't really do anything except that the "x" ignores file systems that are mounted to your principal one that is at "/" (you don't need to traverse them) and the "s" is simply to give you a total only for "/", the root of your machine's main system disk.

And so all that's happening is that the "du" process is traversing all your files on your system disk to see how many bytes are actually being used by real files; however, to do this reasonably accurately, it attempts to "clean up" the file space of extraneous "inactive" blocks, though it can only do that if it is run as the administrator.

Now, system mavens might tell you that there is no difference between an "inactive" block of system memory and a "free" block ... but OK, I'm neither going to start a debate nor will I explain the way that fixed sized block of system memory are managed on the disks via a tree of inodes ... well, I'm not going to start.

Don't believe me? Here's what I just did on my iMac (on which I'm writing this...):

Yes, I only have 2 GB in this iMac ... and as we say in French, "et alors?" (or "so what?" with a sneer). This problem is classic, it will creep up on you even if you have 8 GB in your machine, it is not specific to MacOS X, though that's what I'm familiar with here and I have not found a better solution yet.

As an aside, I do not remember when or where I discovered this trick because I certainly did not invent it all by my lonesome; on the contrary, I found it in an afternoon when I discovered that a nightly reboot no longer did the job. So thanks to the forgotten forum with its phantom freebies that get the job done!

It's perfectly true that the improvement in performance is often marginal; put another way, your machine will continue to run just fine when you have more or less exhausted the "free" memory because it will "swap" memory in-and-out of the hard disk as your applications progress -- but the reality is that over time this will become increasingly cumbersome.

It is also true that you can simply reboot your machine to get the same effect; on the other hand, you do not actually need to quit all processes to recover some of the inactive memory, but it works better that way (for me, at least).

Have at it. And while I'm 99.999% confident you cannot hurt anything by following this procedure at any moment, especially if you quit all non-system programs, I guarantee nothing (because someone, somewhere, will find a way ... or think they have).

P.S.: This procedure is particularly "useful" on older machines like my iBook/G4 that take forever to restart. I was not sure it was worthwhile to post until Mr. Fallows indicated to me that he has seen similar issues on his high-falutin' new MacBooks, but I don't know if he ever tried it and so look forward to his feedback someday.

This one is a headache that I have been trying to solve for a few months, and for reasons that will become clear at the end of my explanation, I made things "doubly" worse for myself last week.

My youngest son has been using a Compaq CQ50 for homework and teen stuff for almost two years now, and everything was fine until about four months ago when the wireless router at my mother's home kicked the bucket and I replaced it with a Belkin 300N. My iBook, my other son's Lenovo S10-T, my mom's desktop with a Netgear 802.11g, our two iPod Touchs, and my Motorola phone with WiFi all work fine.

But the CQ50 with an up-to-date version of Microsoft Vista will connect just fine to the router but the router will not establish a connection to the Internet via the cable modem, the message in the network map being "Unidentified Device in Network".

So here's the kicker: Last week, when I took my mother to Arizona to stay with my sister, I discovered that my sister's network (on which she works from home) was terribly slow. The reason being that she was still using a very old router that could only support 10 Mb/sec. She also had an only slightly less old 802.11b wireless router that I gave her a long time ago (i.e., two years), but I didn't realize she (or "a friend") had hung it off the older router. So, what do I do? Rather than simply ditch the older router and use the less old wireless one for everything, I decide -- wonderful brother that I am -- to get her a brand new 802.11g router. I went to Target and, of course, purchased the Belkin 300N that I discovered on sale only to return back to discover that her work laptop is (no suspense here) a newer version of the Compaq CQ50! Same problem except that I was only staying two nights and, as such, took her laptop with me to attempt to fix back in Massachusetts (and while she does not travel much, thank goodness the football season is over [wait 'til next year...] and the spring training is only starting [Go Sox!] because I think she uses it principally for fun and work in front of the television during game breaks).

For the adventurous (or compassionate) Windows junkies out there, let me be clear:

- Wireless connections from the CQ50 to the Internet via the Belkin work fine with Ubuntu 10.10. (I have a USB-based version that I use on family computers so as to not install too much of my own stuff.)

- I have looked in the forums and found plenty of references to this problem, a fair number of recipes from which I've made a few attempts, but as of now without avail. I'm not going to fill up this space even more than I already have with the various approaches that I've already tried because none have worked and I cannot just replace Vista on either of these machines because she uses a specific VPN for her work network and my son has both games and school VPN software that does work with Linux -- and in any case, it should work and I'm going to crack this nut!

So, this is the one geekish Hail Mary that I am sending to Jim Fallows' readers in the hope that someone has seen this problem and found a solution. If you have any thoughts, please send them along -- and for what it's worth, I intend to solve this puzzle during Winter Break next week and will report back, one way or the other.

When I won the iMac, I quickly realized I was torn between the comfort of MacOS X on a much faster machine versus my now acquired habit of using the iBook anywhere in the house as well as when out. I had not used Virtual Network Computing (VNC) much in the past, but I found and installed the then-free version of the beta of JFVNC on my oldish iBook, enabled Apple Remote Desktop (ARD) on the iMac, and quickly discovered that via 802.11g WiFi brought me a more responsive experience on the iBook that I would have with the laptop itself.

The reason that I tried JFVNC -- or even knew about it -- is a bit convoluted and nerdy but related, in short, to another product from the same developer: ScreenRecycler. It's simply a MacOS app that allows one to recycle an old computer running any flavor of VNC by creating an extra screen in the host Mac's display space. Use your imagination.

To make a long story short (and I can hear anyone who got this far thinking "boy, can this guy ever talk..."), I know all the alternatives exist, including the ARD client that I could purchase from Apple -- and I know there are open source solutions that are free -- but I've been using JFVNC for about two years and am very satisfied for many reasons of which I will share the first three that come to mind:

a) It seems like I am sitting at the iMac b) The ability to create secure tunnels with SSL or SSH allows for remote use c) The developer is very helpful and responsive to issues

Give it a try (in any case, that's free!)

Note: I have had quite a few e-mail discussions with Patrick Stein in Germany, the developer of JFVNC, about his product and other software ideas and in fact, I was interested in pursuing a project with him but he's one of those lone-wolf types who seems quite happy =- and successful =- on his own. All power to ya!

4. The best* VNC solution for MacOS X when connected remotely is...

... found at www.LogMeIn.com because its basic version is now free!

Now, if one wishes to do everything that I do with JFVNC but your connection will be from outside your home or office network, a little problem called network address translation will pop up when you come knocking at your door of the address supplied by your ISP. There are ways around this that allow one to make a direct connection from client to host as I do (and am doing at the moment) with JFVNC; however, it can be a headache.

So the alternative is to use a service list www.GoToMyPC.com or www.LogMeIn.com that acts as an intermediary (you all have gotten advertisements from both companies, for sure). They work by allowing your host and target machines to both connect via a third environment that they offer and that establishes secure tunnels on both sides.

But to be frank, I don't use either; however, when I had just started writing this post yesterday, an e-mail arrived that indicated that the basic service of LogMeIn -- a VNC client without file access, etc. -- was now free! I discovered that I still had their server on my iMac but that it had not been turned on for 751 days, which makes sense because that's about when I started using JFVNC, so I updated it from LogMeIn and tried it. It works fine but is rather slow. This is understandable because it seems to be a Java-based solution, but since I don't really need it, I'm going to leave it there. But if it looks interesting, give it a try (and in fairness, that goes for GoToMyPC, too.)

* With a few caveats (and bones thrown to both Apple and Microsoft)

Now, I've written all this and am wondering if I have provoked a flood of nerdy hate mail to Jim's inbox at The Atlantic... so to nip it in the bud, please read on (it's not long):

1) I know that Apple has a perfectly good VNC client in Apple Remote Desktop...

... but it was not free for my iBook/G4 and I was (and still am) frugal.

For what it's worth, the developer of JFVNC has confirmed my simple testing with the ARD client on my iMac (connecting it to the iBook) in which I've discovered it is faster for remote connections than is JFVNC.

2) Microsoft has a very good remote computing solution in Windows Terminal Services...

... but it is not available for free for my iMac. There is a commercial product available from AquaConnect, a relatively young company that licensed the WTS server code from Microsoft and ported it to MacOS X. I guess I just don't see the point if JFVNC fills my needs...

3) ... which leaves me with only one unrequited desire that Apple Remote Desktop does not fulfill (and so JFVNC is inadequate): the audio from my iMac is not accessible on my iBook.

There is a long conceptual discussion that I had considered including in this post about the pros and cons of opensource versus proprietary software, the advantages and disadvantages of working with big and small software companies, etc...

... but I've already had my fill and will leave it there.

That said, I might change my approach to remote computing one of these days...

... but first, I'm going to get these Vista-based laptops to work (and yes, it's as much a challenge as a tightfisted attempt to avoid buying Windows 7 or new laptops, such are the times).

Edward Goldstick is a veteran of the high-tech, software, defense, and energy-technology worlds in the U.S. and France.

About the Author

James Fallows is a national correspondent for The Atlantic and has written for the magazine since the late 1970s. He has reported extensively from outside the United States and once worked as President Carter's chief speechwriter. His latest book is China Airborne.

Most Popular

Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing policy. Until we reckon with our compounding moral debts, America will never be whole.

And if thy brother, a Hebrew man, or a Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee. And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty: thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy winepress: of that wherewith the LORD thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him. And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the LORD thy God redeemed thee: therefore I command thee this thing today.

— Deuteronomy 15: 12–15

Besides the crime which consists in violating the law, and varying from the right rule of reason, whereby a man so far becomes degenerate, and declares himself to quit the principles of human nature, and to be a noxious creature, there is commonly injury done to some person or other, and some other man receives damage by his transgression: in which case he who hath received any damage, has, besides the right of punishment common to him with other men, a particular right to seek reparation.

Writing used to be a solitary profession. How did it become so interminably social?

Whether we’re behind the podium or awaiting our turn, numbing our bottoms on the chill of metal foldout chairs or trying to work some life into our terror-stricken tongues, we introverts feel the pain of the public performance. This is because there are requirements to being a writer. Other than being a writer, I mean. Firstly, there’s the need to become part of the writing “community”, which compels every writer who craves self respect and success to attend community events, help to organize them, buzz over them, and—despite blitzed nerves and staggering bowels—present and perform at them. We get through it. We bully ourselves into it. We dose ourselves with beta blockers. We drink. We become our own worst enemies for a night of validation and participation.

Even when a dentist kills an adored lion, and everyone is furious, there’s loftier righteousness to be had.

Now is the point in the story of Cecil the lion—amid non-stop news coverage and passionate social-media advocacy—when people get tired of hearing about Cecil the lion. Even if they hesitate to say it.

But Cecil fatigue is only going to get worse. On Friday morning, Zimbabwe’s environment minister, Oppah Muchinguri, called for the extradition of the man who killed him, the Minnesota dentist Walter Palmer. Muchinguri would like Palmer to be “held accountable for his illegal action”—paying a reported $50,000 to kill Cecil with an arrow after luring him away from protected land. And she’s far from alone in demanding accountability. This week, the Internet has served as a bastion of judgment and vigilante justice—just like usual, except that this was a perfect storm directed at a single person. It might be called an outrage singularity.

Forget credit hours—in a quest to cut costs, universities are simply asking students to prove their mastery of a subject.

MANCHESTER, Mich.—Had Daniella Kippnick followed in the footsteps of the hundreds of millions of students who have earned university degrees in the past millennium, she might be slumping in a lecture hall somewhere while a professor droned. But Kippnick has no course lectures. She has no courses to attend at all. No classroom, no college quad, no grades. Her university has no deadlines or tenure-track professors.

Instead, Kippnick makes her way through different subject matters on the way to a bachelor’s in accounting. When she feels she’s mastered a certain subject, she takes a test at home, where a proctor watches her from afar by monitoring her computer and watching her over a video feed. If she proves she’s competent—by getting the equivalent of a B—she passes and moves on to the next subject.

During the multi-country press tour for Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation, not even Jon Stewart has dared ask Tom Cruise about Scientology.

During the media blitz for Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation over the past two weeks, Tom Cruise has seemingly been everywhere. In London, he participated in a live interview at the British Film Institute with the presenter Alex Zane, the movie’s director, Christopher McQuarrie, and a handful of his fellow cast members. In New York, he faced off with Jimmy Fallon in a lip-sync battle on The Tonight Show and attended the Monday night premiere in Times Square. And, on Tuesday afternoon, the actor recorded an appearance on The Daily Show With Jon Stewart, where he discussed his exercise regimen, the importance of a healthy diet, and how he still has all his own hair at 53.

Stewart, who during his career has won two Peabody Awards for public service and the Orwell Award for “distinguished contribution to honesty and clarity in public language,” represented the most challenging interviewer Cruise has faced on the tour, during a challenging year for the actor. In April, HBO broadcast Alex Gibney’s documentary Going Clear, a film based on the book of the same title by Lawrence Wright exploring the Church of Scientology, of which Cruise is a high-profile member. The movie alleges, among other things, that the actor personally profited from slave labor (church members who were paid 40 cents an hour to outfit the star’s airplane hangar and motorcycle), and that his former girlfriend, the actress Nazanin Boniadi, was punished by the Church by being forced to do menial work after telling a friend about her relationship troubles with Cruise. For Cruise “not to address the allegations of abuse,” Gibney said in January, “seems to me palpably irresponsible.” But in The Daily Show interview, as with all of Cruise’s other appearances, Scientology wasn’t mentioned.

Most of the big names in futurism are men. What does that mean for the direction we’re all headed?

In the future, everyone’s going to have a robot assistant. That’s the story, at least. And as part of that long-running narrative, Facebook just launched its virtual assistant. They’re calling it Moneypenny—the secretary from the James Bond Films. Which means the symbol of our march forward, once again, ends up being a nod back. In this case, Moneypenny is a send-up to an age when Bond’s womanizing was a symbol of manliness and many women were, no matter what they wanted to be doing, secretaries.

Why can’t people imagine a future without falling into the sexist past? Why does the road ahead keep leading us back to a place that looks like the Tomorrowland of the 1950s? Well, when it comes to Moneypenny, here’s a relevant datapoint: More than two thirds of Facebook employees are men. That’s a ratio reflected among another key group: futurists.

Members of Colombia's younger generation say they “will not torture for tradition.”

MEDELLÍN, Colombia—On a scorching Saturday in February, hundreds of young men and women in Medellín stripped down to their swimsuit bottoms, slathered themselves in black and red paint, and sprawled out on the hot cement in Los Deseos Park in the north of the city. From my vantage point on the roof of a nearby building, the crowd of seminude protesters formed the shape of a bleeding bull—a vivid statement against the centuries-old culture of bullfighting in Colombia.

It wasn’t long ago that Colombia was among the world’s most important countries for bullfighting, due to the quality of its bulls and its large number of matadors. In his 1989 book Colombia: Tierra de Toros (“Colombia: Land of Bulls”), Alberto Lopera chronicled the maturation of the sport that Spanish conquistadors had introduced to South America in the 16th century, from its days as an unorganized brouhaha of bulls and booze in colonial plazas to a more traditional Spanish-style spectacle whose fans filled bullfighting rings across the country.

The Wall Street Journal’s eyebrow-raising story of how the presidential candidate and her husband accepted cash from UBS without any regard for the appearance of impropriety that it created.

The Swiss bank UBS is one of the biggest, most powerful financial institutions in the world. As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton intervened to help it out with the IRS. And after that, the Swiss bank paid Bill Clinton $1.5 million for speaking gigs. TheWall Street Journal reported all that and more Thursday in an article that highlights huge conflicts of interest that the Clintons have created in the recent past.

The piece begins by detailing how Clinton helped the global bank.

“A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts,” the newspaper reports. “If the case proceeded, Switzerland’s largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlement—an unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.”

An attack on an American-funded military group epitomizes the Obama Administration’s logistical and strategic failures in the war-torn country.

Last week, the U.S. finally received some good news in Syria:.After months of prevarication, Turkey announced that the American military could launch airstrikes against Islamic State positions in Syria from its base in Incirlik. The development signaled that Turkey, a regional power, had at last agreed to join the fight against ISIS.

The announcement provided a dose of optimism in a conflict that has, in the last four years, killed over 200,000 and displaced millions more. Days later, however, the positive momentum screeched to a halt. Earlier this week, fighters from the al-Nusra Front, an Islamist group aligned with al-Qaeda, reportedly captured the commander of Division 30, a Syrian militia that receives U.S. funding and logistical support, in the countryside north of Aleppo. On Friday, the offensive escalated: Al-Nusra fighters attacked Division 30 headquarters, killing five and capturing others. According to Agence France Presse, the purpose of the attack was to obtain sophisticated weapons provided by the Americans.

The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. Here’s what that means for its strategy—and for how to stop it.

What is the Islamic State?

Where did it come from, and what are its intentions? The simplicity of these questions can be deceiving, and few Western leaders seem to know the answers. In December, The New York Times published confidential comments by Major General Michael K. Nagata, the Special Operations commander for the United States in the Middle East, admitting that he had hardly begun figuring out the Islamic State’s appeal. “We have not defeated the idea,” he said. “We do not even understand the idea.” In the past year, President Obama has referred to the Islamic State, variously, as “not Islamic” and as al-Qaeda’s “jayvee team,” statements that reflected confusion about the group, and may have contributed to significant strategic errors.