The
biggest wireless announcement of the year was AT&T's proposed purchase of
T-Mobile that would make it the largest carrier in the U.S. While the merger is
expected to get the green light by regulators, some in the industry think that
the merger is bad for the industry.

Sprint is working hard to get the merger blocked and is pulling out all of the
stops to accomplish its mission. Not only does Sprint think that its survival
is at stake, but the company wants everyone to believe that the purchase of
T-Mobile by AT&T will be disastrous for the industry and consumers. Sprint CEO Dan Hesse is working to find any way possible to block the purchase from
having Sprint's own engineers tell AT&T how it could increase its capacity
to hiring lobbyists and courting other CEO's to stand against the deal.

Many think that the only thing Sprint can hope for is to force the FCC and
other regulators to impose conditions on the purchase that would make it better
for Sprint. Sprint CEO Dan Hesse said, "Clearly, purely, we want to win
and block the merger. This one poses real risks."

The issue for Sprint as a company is that the merged AT&T/T-Mobile carrier
and Verizon could make
Sprint unable to compete for new devices and on price, ultimately
forcing the company out of business. Hesse has already admitted that Sprint's
survival as an independent is in doubt if the purchase goes through.

Hesse continues, "The industry just won’t be as innovative and as dynamic
as it has been. It’ll gum up the works when everything has to go through these
two big tollbooths, one that’s called AT&T and one that’s called
Verizon."

While Sprint and Hesse argue against the deal, AT&T says that the merger
would be better for consumers. The purchase would allow AT&T to make more
investments in networks and future technologies according to AT&T. AT&T
General Counsel Wayne Watts said, "Their arguments about prices going up
just defy economic logic. We’ve had wireless transactions multiple times over
the last ten years and prices have gone one direction: they’ve gone down."

Many note that while AT&T has promised it will use the purchase to improve
wireless broadband access, there is no way to force a company to stand up to
promises made. The only way to enforce promises would be for the Justice
Department to place conditions on the merger and if they conditions aren't met
AT&T could be taken to court.

Many
believe that Sprint's concerns are being heard by the decision makers.
Whether or not they are enough to block the sale remains to be seen. The FCC
and Congress are
grilling AT&T on the purchase looking for any possible downside to the
buyout.

Comments

Threshold

Username

Password

remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Dan didn't forge anything, but he and his producers didn't do enough to investigage the source of the documents. They just ran with it. Fox does this every day, and later mentions that their source was mistaken - after the damage is done.

Nice try. Rather himself even asserted that, and I quote, "that "the material" had been authenticated by experts retained by CBS." When in fact no such authentication had been done. They knowingly used forged documents, they continued to defend the stories validity TWO WEEKS after the documents authenticity was called into question.

It was a completely manufactured hatchet job from start to finish. No other possible conclusion can objectively be drawn.

To say "Fox does this every day" is a criminal allegation that you're going to have to back up. If they did this every day, we would know about it, people would be fired and lawsuits would be filed.