Saturday, 2 May 2020

A Step Closer to Justice, an article that never should have to be written.

"Some" NSW Police are either very lazy or are just plain incompetent and there is a lot more to this story than indicated in the High Court Ruling article link below.

When a known fraud, already with a very similar complaint against them for making false allegations causing an investigation of a local doctor can walk into the very same Police Command and make another set of false allegations causing an investigation and the issuing of an AVO and the matter ends up in the highest court in Australia you know our system of law is very broken.

There are very many similar cases of falsely obtained DVO/AVO's against men, usually sort by partners of jilted lovers. In this case an AVO sort on false evidence was an attempt to stop articles appearing all over social media and other press about a fraud by the name of Roselyn Singh.

Roselyn Singh's false accusations to Police end up in the High Court

There are literally pages of content about this fraud by various writers and publishers including Datatheft.

The constable who took the complaint from Singh did not even bother to check the unrecorded "private calls" she showed as evidence of harassment, the email address used to send the harassing emails, the times and dates given as evidence of physical harassment or to even check a previous fraud report she was alerted to that was with detectives in her own command.

In that report was the very same email address and false identity Singh had set up to make false allegations against a Sydney doctor. A cursory glance at that report would have at least raised a red flag. A simple phone call could have avoided the huge expense of this absolute debacle ending up in the High Court.

Even a check on the private calls - origin phone number, which Police have "immediate" access to would have at the very least raised some suspicion as to the veracity of Roselyn Singh's false claims.

In the evidence that set off a series of court cases all the way to the High Court Singh had claimed she received an email however it went into her junk folder. She said she found it after being alerted to it by her employee. Police naturally asked her to produce this email. She didn't, because she couldn't, there was no email sent to her for it to land in the junk mail in the first instance. And again Police did not check the origin number of the harassing calls on a private number she claimed to receive. On Singh's word they proceeded with an arrest with absolutely no validated evidence.

Police also lied when indicating Singh's victim had said he was interstate. Upon ringing Police after a neighbour had alerted him Police were looking for him he stated, to the "woman" constable who he was put through to when asked where he was, "I am camping with my family" to which came the reply, "come to the Police station immediately or we'll send a Police car to pick you up". He arrived at the Sydney Police Station at around 5pm that same day.

Remember these actions, including a previous arrest after turning up at his home at 8am on Bathurst race day with three squad cars and 6 uniformed Police to drag him away were done on the insistence of senior Police officer without a single shred of validated evidence. They knocked on every door in his block of units before reaching his door, the last one in the block.

Is our legal system broken or do we just have a whole bunch of very incompetent power hungry self serving wallopers keen to get a few notches on their belt. This whole mess started because a woman constable "refused" to check the validity of serious accusations made by a known fraud. How do we know she "refused" to look more closely?

A complaint about the matter was made directly with the Police Commissioner. The matter should then have been independently considered however that didn't happen. The matter was handed back to the very same constable who took the false complaint from Singh. She then rang the victim of Singh's false claims and told him she was proceeding with the complaint. When asked was she going to at least look at the fraud report that had been with Detectives for over 6 months about Singh's false allegations against the Sydney doctor using a stolen identity, she said "no" and hung up.

Who paid for this injustice to reach the High Court? You the tax payer.
Is Singh now being investigated for making false claims causing an investigation? At time of publishing the answer is a resounding "No". There has been no response to any communications with Sydney City PAC about Singh.

We will be writing to the NSW Police Commissioner to seek an explanation as to why a false allegation case that reached the High Court does not require at the very least an investigation into Singh's role in the matter and why there was no "independant enquiry" following a complaint about the constable instigating an AVO on totally unveriffed evidence that turned out to be absolutely false.

Roselyn Singh has lifted her fraud game to new heights. The next feature (coming soon) on Singh covers her attempts to rip off the NSW Govt. for $15,000,000.00
If you have a story about Roselyn Singh or any of her many alias's and company's contact us.