m-stane and tren cycle

I have a bottle of each. My question is what is better. Basically the difference would be start mstane week 1 and tren week 3 or tren week 1 and mstane week 3. I have done research and read logs and some people start tren first and add mdrol and some i have seen kickstart with mdrol and add tren.

the more and more i read i was thinking about doing mstane weeks 1-4 and adding in tren for weeks 3-6 which is option 2. What caught my attention was that with mstane ending in week 4 and still having 2 weeks of tren left that will help solidify the gains from the stane while maybe even leaning out and getting stronger on the last 2 weeks of tren only. Any opinions?

i would want to get in, and get out with those compounds, thats why I recomended it 4 weeks with both together.

Agreed.

Psalm 34:10 - "The lions may grow weak and hungry, but those who seek the Lord lack no good thing."EvoMuse Representative |[email protected] | Inspire to EvolveLockout Supplements Representative; Use code anabolic05 at lockoutsupplements.com

3 days?? Lol you. After the first week start to
complain. Give it some time. I think either option one or option two. Tren and mdrol the first 4 then finish with mdrol to keep the gains. Getting of the tren will allow your body to start to recover faster sooner since tren is a known product to cause shut down. Many people run 6 weeks of tren though. Idk. I like what the guys above were saying about option one, but I would prolly run option 2.

Im on day 11 of option 2 and am up 10 lbs. I'm at 3500 and starvIng throughout the day still. I have went from 185-195 in 11 days and feel and look amazing. My question is if I'm still starving and I'm like 700 calories over maintenance already should I up them or if I'm gaining at 3500 keep it there?

I would say option 2. it gives more total time on which will allow for more time for muscle growth, maturity, etc. Short cycles tend to gain a ton of weight and than lose a ton of weight, not too much of it holds.