Are we going to face problems of deflation?

Nowadays we keep on reading that global economies such as US and Europe will face severe problems of deflation due to recession. Fed fund rate in the US is between 0.00-0.25% or 25 bp (100 basis point = 1%). Inflation in these countries is close to 0. With the falling interest rates in India will we too face similar situation?

Deflation is a “sustained” fall in the general price level of goods and service below zero percent inflation. It results in an increase in the real value of money — a negative inflation rate. It is just opposite of inflation, which is the general increase in the price level of goods and services. When the inflation rate slows down (decreases, but remains positive), this is known as disinflation. Disinflation is a substantial drop in the rate of increase of the price level. Deflation should not be confused with temporarily falling prices; instead, it is a sustained fall in general prices.

With the passage of time, the “real price” of any good or service is characterized by above equation. Hence, if it is positive inflation or normal inflation, real price decreases over a period of time. However, if inflation is negative i.e. deflation, real price increases with time. Alternatively, the term deflation was used by the classical economists to refer to a decrease in the money supply and credit.

Causes of deflation

1. Deflation is caused by the fall in aggregate level of demand i.e. there is a fall in how much the whole economy is willing to buy, and the going price for goods. Because the price of goods is falling, consumers have an incentive to delay purchases and consumption until prices fall further, which in turn reduces overall economic activity – contributing to the deflationary spiral. (As we can currently see that buyers believe real estate prices will fall further, thus delaying their purchase decisions. This in turn has reduced the demand for the real estate properties which in turn has reduced the construction activities. Thus, general economic activities such as cement production etc are down.)

As demand and economic activity falls, investments fall as well because corporate do not want to invest in increasing capacity as there is no demand. This leads to further reduction in aggregate demand. This is the deflationary spiral i.e. a situation where decreases in price lead to lower production, which in turn leads to lower wages and demand, which leads to further decreases in price. An answer to falling aggregate demand is stimulus, either from the central bank, by expanding the money supply, or by the fiscal authority to increase demand such as reducing interest rates or giving money to corporate or people at significantly lower rates.

2. In monetarist theory, deflation is related to a sustained reduction in the velocity of money (It is the average frequency with which a unit of money is spent in a specific period of time. Velocity affects the amount of economic activity associated with a given money supply) or number of transactions. This is attributed to a dramatic contraction of the money supply, perhaps in response to a falling exchange rate, or to adhere to a gold standard or other external monetary base requirement. In the present scenario it appears to be one of the prime reasons for growing fears of deflation.

3. Deflation also occurs when improvements in production efficiency lower the overall price of goods. Improvements in production efficiency generally happen because economic producers of goods and services are motivated by a promise of increased profit margins, resulting from the production improvements that they make. Competition in the marketplace often prompts those producers to apply at least some portion of these cost savings into reducing the asking price for their goods. When this happens, consumers pay less for those goods; and consequently deflation has occurred, since purchasing power has increased.

4. Deflation may be caused by a combination of the supply and demand for goods and the supply and demand for money, specifically the supply of money going down and the supply of goods going up. Historic episodes of deflation have often been associated with the supply of goods going up (due to increased productivity) without an increase in the supply of money, or (as with the Great Depression and possibly Japan in the early 1990s) the demand for goods going down combined with a decrease in the money supply.

Indian scenario – Last few years we saw massive boom in all the sectors. There were huge demands for real estate properties, IT services, Cements, Food products etc. Our economy was growing in excess of 9% and mood was upbeat. Everybody thought this growth will continue forever. Hence, corporate invested heavily in building capacity, developers invested billions of dollars in launching new projects etc. Suddenly the boom busted due to financial crisis. People lost jobs, interest rates went up through the roof and demand plunged. There was a huge mismatch between supply (more) and demand(less). This led to price correction – real estate saw over 40% drop in prices, commodities went down by over 70% and so on. Moreover, due to global financial crisis, there is acute shortage of liquidity in the market and hence less flow of money in the economy. People are holding back to their investments as well as consumption; thus, reducing velocity of money. Does it sound like symptoms of deflation?

Effects of deflation

1. Deflation leads to decrease in prices of good and services, increasing value of money. While an increase in the purchasing power of one’s money sounds beneficial, it can actually cause hardship when the majority of one’s net worth is held in illiquid assets such as homes, land, and other forms of private property.

2. Deflation raises real wages, which are both difficult and costly for management to lower. Moreover, falling prices and demand discourages corporations from investing. This frequently leads to layoffs and makes employers reluctant to hire new workers, increasing unemployment.

3. Deflation often follows a period of nearly zero interest rates. When the central bank has lowered nominal interest rates all the way to zero, it can no longer further stimulate demand by lowering interest rates. This is the famous liquidity trap. When deflation takes hold, it requires “special arrangements” to “lend” money at a zero nominal rate of interest (which could still be a very high real rate of interest, due to the negative inflation rate) in order to (artificially) increase the money supply.

Why deflation is bad?

While shoppers see falling prices as a good sign, economists see it as a threat to the economy or nation. Deflation hurts the economy much more than inflation. In fact a small positive inflation is good for the economy because it suggests growing demand as well as healthy economy. However, in deflationary conditions consumers postpone expenditure, because they think prices will decrease further. This decreases demand in the economy which badly affects firms, who then scale back production and investment plans, leading to job losses, further affecting purchasing power and demand, which leads to a downward spiral in the economy.

We will now take a look at the most infamous deflation in the history of modern world.

Deflation in Japan

Deflation in Japan started in the early 1990s. The Bank of Japan and the government tried to eliminate it by reducing interest rates, but this was unsuccessful for over a decade. In July 2006, the zero-rate policy was ended. There were several reasons for deflation in Japan which are explained below:

1. Bust of Asset price bubble: There was a rather large price bubble in both equities and real estate in Japan in the 1980s (peaking in late 1989). When assets decrease in value, the money supply shrinks, which is deflationary.

2. Insolvent companies: During the boom time (1980s) Japanese banks lent aggressively to companies and individuals that invested in real estate. However, when real estate values dropped, people were not able to pay back these loans to banks. The banks tried to collect the collateral (land or properties), but this wouldn’t pay off the loan because their prices had fallen significantly. Banks delayed their decision to foreclose these loans hoping asset prices would improve. These delays were also allowed by national banking regulators. This continuing process is known as maintaining an “unrealized loss”, and until the assets are completely revalued and/or sold off (and the loss realized), it will continue to be a deflationary force in the economy. Improving bankruptcy law, land transfer law, and tax law were suggested by leading economists as methods to speed this process and thus end the deflation.

3. Insolvent banks: Japanese banks had a larger percentage of their loans as “non-performing” i.e. they were not receiving any interest payments on them, but have not yet written them off. With high non-performing loans or assets, they were unable to lend more money; thus, their earnings declined significantly and risk of insolvency increased many a fold.

4. Imported deflation: Japan imports Chinese and other countries’ inexpensive consumable goods, raw materials (due to lower wages and fast growth in those countries). Thus, prices of imported products were decreasing with the rise of economy of scale in China. Domestic producers had to lower their prices in order to remain competitive. This decreasing in prices of domestic products over a period of time led to deflation.

5. Fear of insolvent banks: Japanese people were afraid that banks might collapse so they preferred to buy gold or (United States or Japanese) Treasury bonds instead of saving their money in local bank accounts. Thus less money was available for lending and therefore economic growth. This meant that the savings rate depresses consumption, but did not appear in the economy in an efficient form to spur new investment.

Deflation alarms in the US?

With the fed fund rate at a historic low (0.00-0.25%), there is a growing fear of deflation in the US. Many economists believe that USA could face short term period of deflation. With the bust of housing bubble, acute shortage of credit and falling consumption, USA has more or less similar conditions that were prevalent in Japan in early 1990s. However, I believe there are some basic yet crucial differences.

Firstly, Japanese companies were far more dependent on commercial banks for financing than are today’s U.S. multinationals, which have stockpiles of internal capital as well as broader access to capital markets. Moreover, US Treasuries are still considered as the safest investments in the world. This keeps the flow of money into the US economy.

Secondly, Bank of Japan’s exceptionally poor monetary policymaking was a big reason for the country’s protracted problem. The central bank’s failure to lower interest rates in the early 1990s ultimately drove the economy into a deflationary death spiral. They were just too slow and conservative to react to the situation. However, US Fed has been quite aggressive and proactive in taking sound monetary decisions and ensuring that they do not repeat those mistakes. In 1992, for example, amid negligible inflation and a comatose economy, the Bank of Japan’s key interest rate was still nearly 4%. In contrast, after the tech bubble burst in the USA, the Fed quickly slashed its benchmark rate to 1 %. Also, the current fed rate is between 0.00-0.25%.

Thirdly, though both USA and Japan faced housing trouble and mortgage crisis, Japan’s central bank was too slow to act. The country’s banks hid their bad loans beneath opaque corporate structures rather than absorb the losses. But rather than write off the loans, Japanese banks extended additional credit to borrowers, allowing them to at least make minimal interest payments. Those made banks look healthier than they were, at the cost of impairing the flow of credit to new businesses. However, American banks have been forthcoming in absorbing the losses on their books and writing off loans. This has given fed a clear picture of true losses and subprime crisis in the economy.

Having said that I believe the US economy may bleed for some time and enter a period of deflation. However, that period would be short lived and not as prolonged as that of Japanese economy in 1990s. As per an estimate, avoiding a long period of deflation and recession might cost the US a staggering $3 Trillion.

Will India face deflation?

Let’s examine Indian economy vis-à-vis Japanese economy of 1990s. In the last five years BSE exchange went up from 5,000 to 21,000, an increase of 400% while real estate prices in Indian witnessed an increase of over 300%. This is phenomenal increase in prices and asset prices looked highly inflated. After the global financial crisis, Indian stock exchange plunged by over 60% and real estate values dropped by almost 30-40% in less than six months. Some welcomed this fall while majority believed Indian global dream is finally over. The mayhem still continues with stock prices and real estate prices further going down.

Compare this with that of Japan – In the five years before its 1989 peak, the Nikkei (Japanese stock exchange) stock average rose 275%. Property prices became so inflated that the tiny spit of land surrounding the Imperial Palace in central Tokyo was briefly worth more than the entire state of California. At the time, Japan’s seemingly unstoppable rise inflamed fears among Americans that the United States had slipped into permanent economic inferiority. When the bubble finally busted in late 1989, stock and property prices nose-dived in tandem. In less than three years, the Nikkei stock average fell 63% from its peak of 38,916. It didn’t hit bottom until April 2003 and a total decline of 80%. Do these two stories sound similar? Yeah they do!

Inflation figures for the last week was 3.92% which is far less than the peak rate of 12% less than six months back. Are we going into a period of negative inflation or deflation? We are currently in a state of disinflation which is a decreasing value of inflation as the inflation rate is still positive. However, this may lead to a situation where downward price movement continues and we enter a period of deflation. I believe this is highly unlikely because we are a growing economy with very young population. Moreover, we are not an export oriented economy and hence do not depend too much on external demand. Our economy is mostly driven by domestic demand and consumption, which is somewhat insulated from other countries and global events. We still have lot of room to maneuver our policies to regenerate demand and spending. Yet, with the growing globalization we too run a risk of deflation if our monetary and fiscal policies are not handled well.

How deflation can be avoided?

To counter deflation we have to revitalize our growth story, reignite demand and create confidence among people. Compare to the inflation rate, 3.92%, lending rates in India are still close to 10%, which is quite high. Unless lending rates do not come down people won’t buy properties, automobiles or other consumer goods. Moreover, corporate won’t be able to borrow money to launch new innovative projects, spend on infrastructure or build capacity. Thus, to create demand and investments, government as well as RBI has to bring down this lending rate by implementing ways to reduce cost of borrowing funds.

Hence, only monetary policy won’t be sufficient to tackle this menace; fiscal policy too has to play a significant role here. Government has to be more aggressive in implementing reforms and speeding up infrastructure spending. Let us hope better sense will prevail among our political class.

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Are we going to face problems of deflation?”

This article is good to read. But what I understood by this recession India will grow more than 4% atleast where whole world will grow 1%. So we are second largest economy after china. Only fiscal defecit will create a problem for us which one can see its impact post election. What i believe that US is heart of world You can not ignore US. As per my estimate US economy will change after second half 2010 untill In india there will not be any flow by FII. India is just weak up call. Real estate prices have gone so much that atleast Middle class can not afford so this recession will create lots of opportunity who thinks india story on the prospects of 2014. I will so much pessimistic upto june 2010 at India we will see most worst scanario in our life as we have ever seen. But If you have long term call on Indian story than we will see mother of bull market at 2014-15. So it is welcome recession and and its great golden opportunity at 2010 who has to buy stocks, real estate or any thing else they can buy at 2010 we will not see any specualtion in india regading real estate up to 2012. We will see market will start stabilise at 2010.

The views expressed correctly summarises the prevailing conditions. The recent fall in the inflation rate to 3.39% and the reduction of the GDP growth rate for the last quarter of 2008 further confirm that we are heading for the deflation from disinflation. The econimists are expecting this to happen within the second quarter of 2009.

The fall in GDP data publised o Friday clearly indicates that the two stimulus packages could not have desired effect on the pace of economy. Further, the interest rates for the real consumers (read SME and small to micro borrowers) is still quite high and mostly non available!
The flow of credit to the agriculture sector can give a very encouraging push to the economy but our politicians have created a very bad habit and expectations in this caegory of borrowers not to repay in anticipation of waivers.

With the elections round the corner, any real move to give real thurst to the ailing economy only meets disastrous populastic moves by the government like the hike in DA of Central Govt. employees which will certainly be followed by all the state governments causing further strain of around 20,000 Crores at National level. The government has hardly left any room for the new government to take measures for the econmic recovery by seriously increasing fiscal deficit to over 11% of the GDP which is enouh to keep the FDI away.

We can only wish that the politicians control their intentions for perpetual position in power at the cost of Nation because, only if the nation is healthy, they will be ruling.