At Aerograffix, we were contacted recently by a Community Worker for a new graffiti prevention project. Initially, I (Ainslie) was excited, as I thought the project sounded exciting, exactly what Brisbane needed, BUT….after three scheduled meeting attempts, and waiting for over an hour for a ‘catch up over coffee’ I realized my meeting with the Community Worker was overrated.

The worker wouldn’t tell me what was required or expected of Aerograffix. There was no mention of where any of the projects would happen, or even if a mural would be created. When I specifically asked what services we would be required to deliver, I wasn’t given a straight answer. I was told, we would have to go to community meetings. Fair enough, given that it is a community project, it’s only fair that the community decides on what would be most suitable. I told the Community Worker that myself and Christian would be willing to go to meetings, but, since we operate as a business, we would have to act as one and therefore, charge for any further services provided. I said we were more than willing to come to the table, we just needed something on the table to come for, so to speak. It was clear, the Community Worker wanted someone to work for free. Again, fair enough if someone is starting their career or when budgets are tight, but I did a little digging. It turns out this is a part of a $150,000 project in Brisbane, which was given out of a 3 million dollar fund from the Federal Government. If a project is to attract industry professionals, then it is necessary to have the right funding to do so.

A few days later, I received an email, informing us at Aerograffix that the Durack Guides Hall was going to be re-painted as a part of the Walls and Colours project, as it required rebranding. This is the same Durack Guides Hall which Christian painted in March 2007 which required very little maintenance and was a successful project. In the same email, I was informed that Christian could not be paid if he wanted to be involved in the rebranding and repainting process.

Sure, I understand budgets are tight, and I completely understand that Aerograffix doesn’t need to be involved with every mural project in Brisbane, but…

How is it ‘in the sprit of community’ to paint over one mural with another? And why call us out to a meeting, not telling us any information about some ephemeral community project for which there apparently is no budget for?

Long story short, this is another example of BCC completely missing the mark with graffiti prevention and working with industry professionals.

Below are pictures of the existing murals which were completed in 2007.

Update on 2013-10-02 06:15 by sauce

So, there has been no response from BCC, Visible Ink or any other community agency associated with the Walls and Colours project. Thus far twosites have been ‘vandalised’.

We’ve had plenty of personal support, and kind words from mates, family and friends, but that doesn’t stop the mismanagement of funds. We’ve also had a few quiet words with other people and nothing seems to be balancing.

Aerograffix has since been contacted by IYS (Inala Youth Service) as they wish to use Aerograffix for the ‘rebranding’ of the Durack Guides hut. We’ve followed this up and offered to paint this wall for free, however this has been rejected as the site is reserved for the Walls and Colours project. We were informed by the Community Worker from Visible Ink, the only way Aerograffix could be involved with this site would be as a participant in the workshops. Which, as a professional artist, is nothing short of insulting.

At one stage, Visible Ink, had pictures of the existing mural on their website which were uncredited, which is just a blatent breach of copywright. They have since removed all but one image, which still goes uncredited.

Most importantly, we find it bizarre that out of ten murals (Specifically, one site which Christian has painted previously) which were suposedly a part of a $150,000 project, Aerograffix would be systematically excluded.

In light of recent events, we thought a follow up including email correspondences.

Hi Ainslie,

Thanks for meeting me last week. Throughout the meeting it seemed like we work differently and have different requirements which at this stage makes me inclined to continue working with the Brisbane artists who have a similar approach to my own.

I would also like to inform you that the project aerograffix did with the Durack Guides in DJ Sherrington park in Inala will need to be replaced. The Hut has changed lease owners and therefore it can no longer be called “Durack Guides.” Unfortunately, we will be painting over that mural.

I wish you all the best with your future endeavours!

Thanks

Community Worker

Dear Community Worker,

This is just to re-cap what we discussed at our Wednesday meeting this week. Christian is a professional aerosol artist and has over a decade of professional experience in creating murals all over the East Coast of Australia. He has a well established profile in Brisbane and you can view his website for examples of his work.

At the Sauce Studio we can provide workshops for aerosol art enthusiasts (aged 12+ for safety reasons) either on-site or in-house. Christian can also act as a consultant and provide advice and information regarding the sub-culture of hip hop, aerosol art and young people. The Sauce Studio is a professional art business and must act as one, and therefore, we must charge for services delivered. I appreciate that working in the community development industry funding is tight and there are many other requirements with project delivery, however, neither Christian or myself are in the position to be able to attend further meetings in Brisbane without a fee. There are only so many projects we can be involved in without economic return. I would also expect that a Brisbane City Council initiative which is funded federally should have the funds to deliver a project in it’s entirety. If this is not the case, then I suggest any such project requires further funding and planning if it is to attract industry professionals.

I am also concerned about the existing mural at the Durack Guides Hall. Aerograffix has not been informed that the site requires any maintenance from the buildings owner/user and I would like to question the need for another artist to repaint this site. As Aerograffix is the original artist, it wouldn’t be in the spirit of working with the community to paint over this mural for the sake of spending funding associated with your project. If I was informed during our meeting this was the case, then I would have raised my concerns with your methodology at the time.

You specify that you wish to continue to work with artists who have a similar approach to your own, and I appreciate that you have every right to do so. However, as Christian is a professional mural artist and has over a decade of experience in working with councils and community organisations, I find it remarkable that your working style would be so dissimilar that Christian would not be suitable for this project. Since your initial enquiry took three appointments and I was left waiting for over an hour, I suggest your enquiry was not genuine, and you were seeking information on behalf of your organisation. Again, I appreciate you have every right to seek further information about community projects, but since you were unable to tell me what was required of Christian, when I specifically asked about what you would expect of our organisation to provide for your project, I assert this meeting was a tokenistic box-ticking exercise.

I understand completely that there are other aerosol artists and I do not seek to undermine their work or capabilities. However, I don’t think it is appropriate to paint over another mural as a part of a graffiti prevention project. This type of action is not working with the community, and as I discussed in our face-to-face meeting, this type of action does not foster a culture of support, nor appreciation for legitimate aerosol artists. I also assert that by not divulging any information about the requirements for this project you are organising or not providing an ‘Expressions of Interest’ (or any other specific form of application) your are not acting in a manner that is fair, transparent or in the interests of the wider community and the existing stake holders.

Thank you for your time,

Ainslie Rose

Hi Ainslie and Christian

Thanks for your email. I acknowledge from our conversations that Christian is a professional artists with extensive experience in painting murals.

Because of the objectives and outcomes of the project, I do require a community development approach to the work. This means that I do not know what the project would look like or what my requirements or expectations from Christian would be. From a community development approach the local community partners would make the decisions around the structure and approach taken towards the project. Therefore I do not know what my expectations from Christian would be. This is decided in partnership with everyone. The artist is viewed as 1 of these partners and would need to understand that “working together” approach, which require extensive flexibility and respect.

The Durack Guide Hut belongs to Brisbane City Council and like I explained the lease arrangements has changed with Inala Youth Service and the local youth service network GYPSES taking over the lease. Repainting and re-branding the hut is part of the process for the local young people to create ownership over the space. I plan to work with local artists, local young people and the local community to develop the process and outcome for this. If Christian is interested to be part of the conversation he is welcome, however it is a community development approach and I would want to ensure enough conversations take place to create a shared value base to ensure we work in unity with the community. Unfortunately I can’t pay Christian for this time.

Again, thanks for your time and I would like to apologise for the accident on the Pacific Highway that made me run late.