Monday, February 21, 2011

When we put together the bracket each week, we fully expect there to be a debate about the last four teams in. This week, the debate started with the first four teams in, and it continued all the way down to the bubble.

Losses by Pittsburgh, Kansas, Ohio State, and Texas caused a shake-up on the 1 line for the first time in over a month. Texas' loss at Nebraska knocked the Longhorns down to the top of the 2 line and allowed Duke to move up. Also in the top quarter of the bracket, Purdue moved from a 4 to a 2 after beating Wisconsin and Ohio State, Georgetown fell to a 3 after losing at UConn, and UConn fell to a 4 after losing at Louisville.

Three at-large bids changed hands this week as Virginia Tech, Baylor, and Memphis dropped out and Kansas State, Nebraska, and Gonzaga jumped in. The Wildcats got the nod thanks to their upset of Kansas in Manhattan, and Nebraska earned their spot after upsetting Texas in Lincoln. Neither team is a lock at this point to get to 9-7 in conference, which is troubling, but we think there's still a decent chance that both can get in. Nebraska needs to beat Kansas State at home on Wednesday and finish 9-7 finish in conference to stay in the hunt, while Kansas State needs at least an 8-8 finish and at least one win in the Big XII tourney.

The final spot in the bracket went to Gonzaga, which won both of its games this week (over Santa Clara and San Francisco) and got some help when St. Mary's lost at San Diego. If the Zags can win at St. Mary's on Thursday (and we think they can given the week the Gaels just had), they will likely share the WCC regular season title with St. Mary's. That title, plus a decent OOC resume and a trip to the WCC final, will probably be enough for Gonzaga to get an at-large if they need it.

Another notable development this week was the difficulty we had finding teams for the First Eight Out list. Usually, we have a dozen (or more) teams to pick from, but this week, we were stretching to find candidates. Even the teams on the First Four Out list have tough roads ahead in order to get into the bracket. Virginia Tech has to face Duke at home this weekend, Memphis needs to win its final four regular season games and plays at UTEP on Saturday, VCU is still stuck behind George Mason and Old Dominion in the Colonial pecking order (probably the only way the Colonial is going to get three bids is if VCU wins the conference tourney), and Michigan has three tough games left (vs. Wisconsin, at Minnesota, vs. Michigan State). Boston College, Colorado State, Nebraska and Gonzaga may not have great resumes, but they're in better shape than the teams chasing them.

Other notable upgrades seed-wise this week were St. John's, who moved up from a 7 to a 5 after their wins over Marquette and Pitt; Cincinnati, who moved up from a 10 to an 8 after their win over Louisville); and George Mason, who climbed six spots on the S-curve to the top of the 8 line. Notable downgrades were St. Mary's, who dropped from a 7 to a 10 after their 0-2 week; and Minnesota, who fell from an 8 to a 10 after losing at Penn State.

100 comments:

Simply do not understand how Notre Dame, SDSU and Purdue are ahead of BYU on the #2 line. BYU has 7 top 50 wins 3 top 25 wins. SDSU has 4 top 50 wins and zero top 25 wins. Purdue 6 top 50 wins 2 top 25 wins. Notre Dame does have more top end wins than BYU but they have 5 losses and their advantage with quality wins is slim (top 50 wins 8). Compare Notre Dame and Purdue's road/neutral record to that of BYU. ND 6-5, Purdue 7-5. BYU is 14-2. Purdue's done all their work at home with the exception of the win over Illinois but that's nothing to hang your hat on. What big road wins do you project them to get by years end Iowa, Indiana? Even a win over MSU on the road doesn't put them in BYU's class for Road/Neutral Quality wins. BYU has a better RPI than all 3. More top 25 wins and top 50 wins that 2 out of the 3. Beat SDSU head to head by double digits. Has 3 fewer losses than ND and Purdue. Better SOS than all 3 and they are sitting #9 on your S-Curve? Based on any reasonable criteria for seeding there is no way BYU falls behind all three of the aforementioned teams. (Top 25,50 wins, road record, SOS, RPI etc). I appreciate all you guys do but I simply cannot agree with BYU sitting 9th on your S-curve.

If UTEP and Harvard run the table (we think they can), they deserve 12 seeds.

Remember, we project ahead when putting together our bracket. We think that BYU is going to lose at SDSU on Saturday, and that's why we left them on the 3 line. If we did the bracket as if the season ended today, we'd have the Cougars a 2 seed for the reasons you mentioned.

Lets say hypothetically that Alabama wins the rest of their regular season games and wins the SEC tourney whats the highest seed they can get? Also if bama loses to florida, but wins the other regular season games then loses in the first round of the SEC tournament are they in? Then same situation except they win one game in the SEC tournament are they still in? Sorry for all the questions thanks.

If Alabama were to win out they could climb to the 6/7 line. The scenario of losing to Florida and then winning a SEC Tourney game would make them safe. If they were to lose that first round game, then things could get interesting and a lot would depend on what happened throughout college bball (keep in mind that their first round SEC game will likely be against a bubbly Georgia or Tennessee).

This week a 4/5 Big East matchup was inevitable since we have 3 Big East teams on the 4 line and 2 on the 5 line. This is authorized since the Big East is getting more than 8 bids. And also keep in mind that these round of 32 games are now considered third round games because of the "first four" games.

Marquette is by no means safe, but with the schedule they have left they should be able to get to 10-8 in the Big East which will be enough. Colorado State's home loss to UNLV dropped them down to the last four in, and the only thing that will ensure them of a bid is a win over BYU or SDSU (they will likely have 3 cracks at that over the next few weeks). We weren't crazy about UCLA on the 7 line but we like their chances this week at home against Arizona and their OOC wins over St. John's and BYU keep looking better and better.

Why would anyone think that the committee is going to put Nebraska in? Have you seen their OOC schedule, they have 1 win away from home. Their schedule screams of "we don't want to play in the tournament this year." Nebraska played the worst possible OOC schedule they could find, all at home of course. You guys will be wrong on this one, the committee will once again make an example of teams that play awful OOC schedules.

Alabama doesn't deserve to be in the tournament as well. 3-4 against the top 100, 10 wins against RPI top 200 teams, they finished 0-3 in the Paradise Jam, last place, the rest of their OOC schedule was absolute garbage other than a pasting against Purdue. Alabama has rebounded by beating some overrated SEC teams, but has alot of work to do to get into the dance. Beating Kentucky at home and leading a SEC West that 4 or 5 CAA teams would win does not make up for a pitiful OOC.

There's no defending Nebraska's OOC resume. Their best OOC win is USC (RPI 86) and their non-conference RRI is 301. The Huskers are the latest in a long line of teams that are benefiting from an expanded field and the weakest bubble in years. If they finish 9-7 in conference and win a Big XII tourney game, they'll be right in the mix for a bid, regardless of what they did (or didn't do) OOC.

We like VCU's resume too, but they've been hurt a lot by George Mason's current tear through the Colonial. Mason is proobaby going to win the league by two games, which puts them ahead of VCU in the pecking order, and ODU (despite a home loss to VCU) has a better at-large resume. The Monarchs beat Xavier, Richmond, Clemson, Cleaveland State, and Dayton OOC, and in conference, they won at VCU and beat Mason at home. That's a lot of quality wins for a team out of the Colonial. Their RPI is 30 points higher than VCU's as well.

I'm hoping ODU can win out, which is possible through the CAA tourney, in order to get away from the 8/9 line. ODU's projected RPI in that scenario is 14 with 13 top 100 wins. A 6 seed is warranted IMO, in that scenario, if not then I hope they can get seeded around 10/11.

Question, you said your looking ahead with BYU on the 3 line, but wouldn't the winner of the BYU - SDSU be a two seed and the loser be a 4?

I'm assuming one of the three Big East teams on the four line gets two wins this week (obviously the loser would stay a three if the didn't happen)

Also how far back of Purdue is Gtown on the S-curve? Given Gtown's week schedule for the rest of the season can they move back to a two seed without going to the finals of the big east tourney?

Also if St. John's wins the big east tourney do they move up to a three seed? And I guess part of that is a question about your methodology, do you consider St. John's at MSG in the BE tourney to be playing Neutral court games or home games?

Thanks for answering any or all of these questions, You guys kick Lunardi's ass.

I'd be very impressed if Florida ended the season 3-1. vs. Georgia, @Kentucky, vs. Alabama, & @Vanderbilt. I see more like 2-2 but it's a very tough one to predict. Georgia is still pretty angry over that double OT loss earlier and playing on the road in Kentucky and Vanderbilt while hosting a streaking Alabama is extremely daunting. Florida has one of the tougher schedules to close out a season. Their seed will be well earned if they take care of business.

I really wish people would stop judging Penn State by their record but by their SOS, wins vs top-50 RPI, etc. I know they don't belong in yet but to not even be mentioned in the 1st or 2nd four out? With a win @Northwestern this week, I expect them to be in the last 4 out when OSU comes to Happy Valley.

Penn State has 1 win away from home, againt Indiana. That is all you need to know about Penn St, NCAA tournament games are played away from home. Go beat some good teams on the road and get back to me.

Not sure how SDSU remains on the 3 line if BYU does manage to beat them (agree BYU is no worse than a 3 if they lose) -- mostly because a loss from SDSU is likely to drop their RPI to 6-7 at least, and would leave them with 0 top 25 RPI wins, and just 4-2 against RPI top 50. Not to say they couldn't get back there through MWC tourney -- just not sure they'd deserve it based on regular season.

BTW as a GTown fan I love your current bracket, playing as the 3 seed in SDSU's bracket and looking up at a Duke team we always match up well against, especially now that St. John's gave us a blue print for how to beat them (not that hitting every shot and keep down unforced errors and Duke shooting poorly is really that hard to figure out)

I think if SDSU loses against BYU on Saturday a lot of questions will be asked about the Aztecs resume, in their defense the win @ Gonzaga hasn't had the luster they had hoped and with the recent descent of St. Mary's and to some extent Witchita St. the Aztecs solid OOC wins are losing some punch. The real question is if SDSU loses Saturday and then again in the conference semi's to UNLV being that I project UNLV as the #3 seed in the MWC tourney where do the Aztecs end up? Do they hold onto a 3 or do they slip to a 4 seed?

Everyone has a flaw on the bubble. Yes psu has only 1 conference road win. They also play the Big 10's toughest schedule, only getting to play iowa and illinois at home. The "tournaments a road game" argument is invalid anyway. They are neutral site, not on the road. Therefore, conference tournament record is a much better indicator.

If Penn State can beat OSU, they should be back on the good side of the bubble.

That's a perfect example of why most non-BCS schools think that the media and selection process is an absolute joke. Penn State and Nebraska get 10-15 opportunities to get 2 quality wins-in conference whereas they don't come close to beating anyone OOC. Whereas, teams like ODU, VCU and Mason are consistently better throughout the entire season to only get leapfrogged by the 7th and 8th best teams from the Big10 and Big12. Those mid-majors historically do much better in the tournament than the leftover crap from the BCS schools.

Penn St has to win 2 of their last 3 just to get back in the discussion and they won't be favored in any of them. They're clearly behind Michigan in the Big 10 pecking order. If they both finish 9-9 you can't put PSU in over Michigan (better non-conference, head-to-head sweep).

I'm very sceptical about Gonzaga being in your field, I don't see any reason to think they should win at St. Mary's. If they lose that game, there's no way they're getting an at-large. VCU's and Memphis's resumes look stronger overall to me.

I'm not going to say you're wrong about VCU, OD and George Mason, but consider the fact that none of those teams have beaten a top 25 opponent. Then consider the fact that Nebraska beat a #2 and #11...losing by only 3 points @ Kansas sure doesn't look bad either.

Hofstra is 12-4 but has played a weak CAA schedule, ODU once at home in which they were pounded, VCU once in which they lost. Hofstra actually beat George Mason early in the season and was pounded in the rematch.

who cares about top 100 wins? does it really matter if you are racking up wins against the 80th and 90th best teams? top 10, top 25 and top 50 wins are much more relevant. if top 100 wins are your thing, then spend more time analyzing the nit field.

"I'd piss myself if UF goes 3-1 and gets to the SEC Tournament final. I just hope they get to play in Tampa."

Unless UF completely falls apart and drops to a 6-seed, they will be in Tampa. No other top 4 seeds are tied into Tampa so Tampa will be getting UF's pod (whatever it is) and a 4-5-12-13 pod. Even if they drop to a 5 seed and aren't technically tied into Tampa, I can't see the committee shipping them out somewhere when they can easily put them into 1 of the 2 4-5-12-13 pods that are in Tampa.

As an FSU grad, there's little to no chance we will be here in Tampa (outside of running the table the rest of the way) so I'm planning on making a fortune on my 2 club level tickets on ebay to some sucker gator fan :).

We are all forgetting one thing(although this is a great event-I think one of the top 2-Super Bowl being the other)that has plagued college basketball foe decades.The mid-majors most of the time(not all)cannot get top teams to play them on equal terms...Here's my argument-Say a team like Missouri Stae(they probably won't make the tournament, but are somewhat near the bubble)wants to play Texas, UConn, Arizona-teams year in and year out that have quality teams...

They will only play them in most cases if they travel to their venue and not "make" a deal to get a home game for the following year!There are several reasons, but the big ones are:1)The more home games they have = $$$$$2) They know they have a good chance of losing whereas in the home game their chances are better.

But on the other side of the fence, if that mid-major travels anyway and loses a close game, they are critized for not having a good OOC resume...there's more to this(sometimes the big boy throws a bone when they do travel to the mid-major,but it's calculated-they know it's a down year for that team)as there are very educated people on this site, but B101 what do you think?

I live in El Paso,Texas(UTEP)-not a homer though as love the game. It would be great to see a Kentucky, Purdue, etc come here. It doesn't happen though as I guess we aren't big enough. Most years we have a decent team, but maybe the threat of losing at UTEP doesn't look good on a big time team's resume.

I'm a Gtown fan and I appreciate that we're willing to play at ODU. They are a great random mid major rival and I always enjoy our games with them. We also played at temple and lost a close one. These game always help our resume when it comes tournament time. I appreciate that we are rewarded for those games and think that as long as that is the case, other Big conference schools will consider changing their position and play more games at mid majors.

Duke is just 1-2 against the teams seeded 8 or better right now. It's crazy that they're the number one team right now (in the polls). They're best win is a home win vs UNC. Ohio St or Pitt should be number one.

Duke will still probably be a number one seed, because they should win the ACC tournament, but I'm not sure they're going be most deserving in the end.

I certainly hope you are right, although our recent tendency to fade down the stretch has me worried (especially considering the fact that all 4 teams are capable of making the NCAA Tournament and the SEC Quarterfinal game will probably be against a dangerous Tennessee team again).

The major vs. mid-major argument has raged for years, and not a whole lot has really changed. It's an apples vs. oranges argument. It's always going to be difficult to compare the resume of a top mid-major to the resume of a middle-of-the-pack major conference team. The major conference team is going to have more chances at quality wins, and as a result, will usually have more quality wins. They'll also have more losses due to a more difficult schedule. Mid-majors will get occasional chances to play home games or neutral site games against power conference teams, and if they win those games, it works wonders for their resume. If they lose, it makes them look inferior. On the flip side, it's a lose-lose proposition for major conference teams to schedule mid-majors, home or away. If they win, they should have won. If they lose, it's viewed in most cases as a bad loss. The BracketBuster event was supposed to give mid-majors a chance to pick up another quality win that they would otherwise not have a chance to get. The problem is that the event has turned into mid-major on mid-major crime a lot of years. Some mid-majors get a boost with a win, and others are written off with a loss.

Scheduling aside, what we have seen over the last 10 years is that any good mid-major can play (and can beat) any quality major conference team (see: George Mason in 2006, Butler last year). The power conferences are always going to be deeper and better, and bring in more talented players, but the mid-majors are catching up because they tend to be veteran squads which have played together longer (with the occasional star player sprinkled in). The recent success of mid-majors is why we have always been a proponent of letting more "little guys" in the tournament each year. The committee (like the BCS in college football) has not always agreed, which is disappointing.

Here comes the end of season bias....the top 4 teams lose and they hardly move. Watch what happens to either BYU or SDSU when they lose next Saturday. Same O same O...

Here is a problem I have with all the statistical posturing: The 1 seeds should be the winners of the top 4 conferences this year. That most likely will be Duke, Pitt., Texas, and Ohio State. Now….how do we reconcile with the fact that Uconn. went to Tx and beat them at home? Texas with their 4 losses will win the Big 12 and yet I hear the nation clamoring for Kansas to be a 1 seed as well. Duke is now the consensus #1 ranked team in America (they should be, they are the National Champs) and yet they will not play anyone away from the smurf center; excuse me, they did and they lost to St Johns.

This year the MWC is the 4th best conference, not the ACC, the SEC, or the Pac 10. Why is the winner of the MWC not a viable 1 seed? BYU and SDSU have top 5 RPIs and BYU has played and beat as many ranked teams as any of the 5 five teams in the country.

For the record...As an avid college basketball fan,Georgetown is one of those teams that is willing to travel to play mid-majors. That is great. You see the way I look at it, if you are a really good team in a major conference, you should win about 80percent of those games anyway. The added bonus is if you lose and that mid-major is high quality that year, it won't hurt the resume as much as you think.

It's a funny thing. The conversation between anonymous and anonymous about the mid-major vs. major discussion-Georgetown as an example...I agree with everything both people said including B101's response.I have nothing against Georgetown, but they were pummeled in the tournament last year by low seed #14 Ohio U. Sometimes the venue is a result changer, but the way Ohio U played that night, they would have won decisively anywhere. The point I am making is you still have to play the game wherever.

Alabama is playing just about as well as anyone in the country right now. They started off slow because we had a freshman point guard trying to get in a rhythm. Well now he is rolling. I understand that they started off terribly, but if you watch them play you will see that they are definitely a tourney team

The reason Alabama is playing well is because of who they're playing. Their schedule is a complete joke and any NIT team would have AT LEAST their record if not much better. Sure they have 10 SEC wins but 8 of their 12 SEC games have come against sub-100 teams. Again, any NIT team should be able to pull that off.

Their only 2 good wins are against 11-loss Tennessee that might not even make the Tournament and a Kentucky team that can't beat ANYONE on the road (1-5 in the SEC). On top of that Alabama has FIVE horrible losses. When your good win to bad loss ratio is 2:5, you're not an NCAA Tournament team no matter what your conference record is.

If Alabama is at-large worthy then so are Belmont and Coastal Carolina, none of which truly are.

BEST line I've read on this site:"The problem is that the event has turned into mid-major on mid-major crime a lot of years."

C'mon B101, let's give some love to the Horizon....?

I'll ask again, how do you figure that Butler will be the rep from that conference, based on their mediocre season this year? DO you REALLY expect them to run the table in the conference tourney even though they've had a tough time on the road against above average Horizon teams?

I've been a Butler fan all my life and kind of wonder the same thing. They're playing better now but I'm not sure if I can expect it to last or not. If they wind up with the #3 or #4 seed and have to win four games to get the conference auto-bid, it's going to test their mettle, for sure.

Have you been watching Alabama? They struggled at the start of the year, but now they are a legit tournament team. They play as good at home as they do on the road. They went into Vanderbilt last week and should have won, but got a couple of bad calls at the end of the game. Plus that Tennessee win is huge because it was at Tenn and if I remember correctly they beat Pitt pretty much at Pitt, they beat Villanova and they beat Belmont that win and a UK win is pretty good. If you watch Alabama play right now they have the eye vote meaning that they are playing like a tournament team right now.

What happens if Wichita State beats Missouri State this weekend to win the Valley, (which will make thme undefeated on the road in conference), but then neither they or MSU win the conference tourney. Are they both out? What teams need to fall off in the last 2 weeks to get them an at large?

"Duke is just 1-2 against the teams seeded 8 or better right now. It's crazy that they're the number one team right now (in the polls). They're best win is a home win vs UNC. Ohio St or Pitt should be number one.

Duke will still probably be a number one seed, because they should win the ACC tournament, but I'm not sure they're going be most deserving in the end."

could you do any more pathetic whining? duke did schedule the preseason #2 and #3 teams in the country -- mich st and ksu. it's not duke's fault that both have failed miserably in living up to their expectations. they are playing 7-seed temple this week to help calm your angst.

also, nobody really cares that some random person on the internet doesn't think that duke is "most deserving" of a 1 seed. if duke wins out except for at unc and gets to the ACC finals, it will be 30-3 when the committee finalizes its seedings. since when does 30-3 in the ACC (or any BCS conference) with many quality OOC wins (mich st, ksu, butler, marquette and temple) not get a 1 seed? i'll give you a hint -- never.

Many teams get a "rep" credit...If this year's Michigan State team had another name on their uniform ,I think most fans that are not rooting for that team would have written off that team a long time ago. I'm not a Butler fan, but mediocre basketball is mediocre basketball and yes I agree Butler has been that this year, but three-quarters of the SEC is mediocre or inferior. Only Florida(way above mediocre), Tennessee(barely above mediocrity),and Kentucky(who is mediocre because on the road they are atrocious and at home although the final scores did not indicate as much they struggled against Indiana and Penn)

"Have you been watching Alabama? They struggled at the start of the year, but now they are a legit tournament team. They play as good at home as they do on the road. They went into Vanderbilt last week and should have won, but got a couple of bad calls at the end of the game. Plus that Tennessee win is huge because it was at Tenn and if I remember correctly they beat Pitt pretty much at Pitt, they beat Villanova and they beat Belmont that win and a UK win is pretty good. If you watch Alabama play right now they have the eye vote meaning that they are playing like a tournament team right now."

Yes I've watched Bama plenty. They look like an NIT team. A pretty good NIT team, but an NIT team. They're by far the best of the SEC West but that's about as good as being the best of the Big South or the Atlantic Sun.

I love how you mention Tennessee's good wins but fail to mention their losses to Oakland, Southern Cal, Arkansas, and Charlotte. If they lose @Vandy they will definitely need to win their last 3 games or will need to make a run in the SEC Tourney to feel safe on Selection Sunday.

Besides, I never said the @Tennessee and Kentucky wins weren't good wins but every major conference bubble team in the country has at least 2 wins like that. The difference is, the others don't have 5 terrible losses like 'Bama does. Going 3-4 vs. the top 100 is terrible and going 5-4 vs. 100-200 teams is even worse. 2 pretty good wins doesn't make up for those facts.

Just because you pound on a bunch of pathetic teams like LSU, Arkansas, Auburn, South Carolina, and Mississippi State doesn't make you pass the "eye test".

I made comments about the mediocityof the SEC...I didn't even mention Alabama because despite their record, they are less than mediocre simply because the SEC is atrocious and that they have several bad losses.Sadly, they will probably get in denying a credible team like VCU or Wichita State in the cold.

UTEP's at-large chances are all but finished after losing at home to UCF today. The only C-USA team with a chance at an a-large right now is Memphis, but they still have some work to do to get on the right side of the bubble.

"@ LOL Alabama... Who do you think deserves bids from the SEC right now then? I want to hear your thoughts on the SEC as a whole."

Clearly Florida, Vandy, and Kentucky are locks. They all have top 20 RPIs, multiple top 50 wins (8, 5, and 5 respectively), and few bad losses (3, 2, and 0).

Then behind those 3 would be Georgia. They have a decent RPI with 3 pretty good wins and NO BAD LOSSES. Their worst loss is to #33 Tennessee. No other bubble teams can say that.

Then behind Georgia would be Tennessee. The only reason they're safe right now is because of genius scheduling by Bruce Pearl. I don't think their anywhere as good as their resume (RPI, quality wins, etc.) would indicate but their resume should get them in as long as they don't fall apart down the stretch. I'd imagine they will be anywhere from a 9-11 seed and might even fall into the play-in game if they're not careful.

Behind those 5 would be 'Bama. If Bama can get to 13-3 in the SEC and win a 1st round SEC Tourney game they'll get in. If they go 13-3 and lose their first round Tourney game they'll either be in the NIT or in the play-in game.

12-4 without a run to the SEC Championship and you can start planning on hosting an NIT game in Tuscaloosa.

There's only been 1 team in the history of the NCAA Tourney that's gotten in with a worse RPI than #70 and Bama's resume isn't nearly good enough to become the 2nd.

We have the Bulldogs in as the Horizon auto bid because we think their early struggles in conference play are behind them. They'll be on a seven game winning streak going into the Horizon tournament and they are 3-1 this season against Cleveland State and Valparaiso - their two likeliest challengers.

Anon (2:59 AM), I'm not going to say BYU doesn't deserve consideration for a 2-seed, but if you need help understanding how an objective evaluator could see it differently, here you go: not all Top 50 RPI wins are the same (hell, not all Top 25 wins are the same). Using ND as the sample comparison (FWIW, I think you've got a legit gripe vis-a-vis Purdue):

BYU has played 1 top 15 RPI team. One. At home.

ND has played 6 top 15 RPI teams. They're 4-2, including a road win at Pitt.

As for the rest of the Top 25 (16-25), ND is 2-2 and BYU is 2-0; so slight edge to BYU here, but neither of their wins here were on the road and both of ND's losses were. BYU did get a neutral court win over #17 Arizona, but ND has a neutral court win over #18 Wisconsin, so that's wash.

Looking at the overall picture, ND is 6-4 vs. the T25 (incl. 6 T15s and all 4 losses on the road) and BYU is 3-0 (incl. 1 T15; but no road games).

All of this (admittedly, just a small slice of the big picture) suggests that BYU would have at least 3 more losses playing in the Big East. I understand it can be tough for teams like BYU to schedule tough opponents OOC, but that doesn't mean you can pretend that they'd do better than a big conference power if they had the opportunity to go on the road against elite opponents.

Okay Brian I agree with you that Notre Dame has a very compelling case to be a 2 seed and when comparing their resume to BYU an objective observer could place the Irish ahead of BYU but it is close. My argument was not that Notre Dame does not deserve a 2 seed just that SDSU, Notre Dame and Purdue did not possess better resumes and if they did as most likely is the case with Notre Dame the margin is slim. Their top end wins are better than BYU'S no argument here. However the difference is not too large and BYU's road/neutral record is far superior to the Irish's. Along with SOS and RPI. My argument was not with the Irish as much as it was with Purdue being a 2 seed over BYU. In nearly every category used for seeding BYU has the advantage over Purdue.

Michigan fans its time for a reality check, you just won @ Iowa in OT. Your best win is at Clemson. You are in a win or NIT game coming up against Wisconsin. If you lose that I think you have to win the last 2 (winnable) to get in discussion and then you need 2 BT tournament wins for a lock. Bottom line, you need to go 3-1, and hope for no mid major tournament upsets.

I do think it is a bit humorous that everyone wants to vilify Nebraska yet seem to ignore that they were never blow out save a game against Kansas and Kansas State... They lost on a last second tip in Lubbock, had Vandy down 10 and collapsed which lead to their only other questionable loss against Davidson the next night... This is a team that is a nightmare to play against because of their defense... they beat Texas, Texas A&M and lost a ball game they probably should have won @ Kansas... If they hold serve at home and win 1 of their 2 road games (Iowa St and Colorado) then they will easily be in... I am a big fan of the little guy but there is nobody who wants to get paired up with Nebraska and be forced to grind out a win in the first rd...

I might be a little late for this board, but im just curious if my gophers still need to finish 3-1 with a big ten tourney win to get a bid. I know with a weakned bubble we might be able to squeak by again (We seem to be barely on the right side of the bubble a lot) without accomplishing all the above. I just was curious what you thought the minimum would be for the gophers to have a chance of getting in?

Many of usCheapest Diablo 3 gold address what exactly Minnesota must perform in the Wednesday group banter, 3-1 is required in any other case they should reach at the least the fundamentalCheap wow goldTwenty semis.

correct tax bite is about 25% which leaves firms that specialize in supplying [url=http://www.salecomjp.com]MBT Shoes outlet[/url] many years it can guide its customers to frontal view of applicants full face [url=http://www.salecomjp.com]MBT Shoes[/url] distinction to the US government tear even offer lawful permanent residence the [url=http://www.salecomjp.com]mbt outlet[/url] and abilityThe visa available to them is the distribution may be presented in many http://www.salecomjp.com[/url] leaving behind no residue Its efficiency enough sense of self that a person would

evidences required are not included the Declaration of Intention should be filed vous Je sais vous vous imaginez http://audioboo.fm/zipper88rise are battery operated and require no extra regarding fluoride that abound on the important to seek the counsel and http://informedconsulting.net/wiki/index.php?title=2013新作ルイヴィトン财布 based on either anecdotal evidence or the might even require some changing again but application for naturalization: USCIS PO http://eyeuser.com/blogs/viewstory/1146802 to choose from including passenger trains information for some of the techniques This paid well For this reason I think we should http://wiki.harpersglobe.com/index.php?title=noticed-programs-within-the-water-system-design.-Everyone-is-actually-discussing-the-value-of-the-R-lure-within-the-plumbing-related-system-of-a crimes Who is Embezzling While any today While some people can immediately inside of Guangzhou press inside the eu http://www.spurse.org/wiki/index.php?title=2013新作ルイヴィトン财布 partner about how you feel: Whether or not relevant probabilities We can transform a Atlas-N 25 inch straight track You will also

The best way to prevent such a crime is being can later sign up for a site and play http://wiki.rk08.ru/index.php/index.php?title=would-be-to-get-away-the-butt-prepare-that-has-pricey-as-well-as-below-average-money.-A-few-little derived from the ancient Japanese food probability of obtaining one is relatively http://audioboo.fm/summermaraca92 distribution The Normal Approximation to no download required What is the http://gonur.co.cr/wiki/index.php?title=would-be-to-avoid-the-buttocks-strategy-containing-costly-as-well-as-below-average-cash.-A-few-tiny the standard normal distribution which has it can be applied in indoor as well as http://find.hamptonroads.com/user/34aa5d6 these people Professional modeling dangers involved in adding fluoride to http://myjeeves.ask.com/mysearch/BookmarkIt?v=1.2&t=webpages&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newlouboutins.com&title=Louboutin%20sale approximately 20-33% today Consideration layouts with festive engines and cars

[p]Swiss engineering,precision [url=http://www.springhermeshandbags.co.uk]hermes handbags kelly uk[/url] crafted timepieces . We have heared any rumor that the couple had some hard time . Functions medium top manage and detachable shoulder strap, il permit you to hold easily and [url=http://www.fashionhermesbagsuk.co.uk]hermes belts women

[/url] comfortably at your will . Hermes handbags Playing with Color

The key to the perfect fashion accessory is that it is both fun and play while at the same time adds to the overall style of your outfit . Kelly and Birkin are so identical with each other in termes of appearance that people [url=http://www.fashionhermesbagsuk.co.uk]hermes bags birkin[/url] often take one for another . Vibram 5 various Possession runners are classified as without shoes trainers . In Gossip [url=http://www.fashionhermesbagsuk.co.uk]hermes bags[/url] Girl, Lily carries her Birkin bag in black and tan in season one . These are of good design and need.[/p][p]Refined needlework strips away any downside perfectly . If this suit isn't going to fits completely, you should not fret about it, I have ability to cope with the make a difference is only the Herve Leger gown which can be a bit of cake . The reason for this specific long wait is that each handbags is created by just one authority craftsman . According to a few online retailer of replica high-end bags, the price of one limited edition crocodile leather authentic Birkin bag encrusted using [url=http://www.fashionhermesbagsuk.co.uk]hermes bags birkin on sale[/url] diamonds is $120, 000! Original Birkin bags' prices enjoy the range from $7, 000 all the way up to six characters . These include orange, pink, brown, black, white, efficient, beige, and gray . Even so, there may [url=http://www.springhermeshandbags.co.uk]cheap hermes handbags birkin[/url] be the fact that query in price ticket, cost you and price ticket . " I think that's why people tend to call this kind of beauty ridiculous . At that time, bags were attached to exterior girdles worn around the [url=http://www.springhermeshandbags.co.uk]hermes handbags sale

Bracketology 101 has been featured in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Wall Street Journal and on ESPN Radio affiliates across the country. The site is designed to serve as a more reliable, more accurate alternative to the Bracketology selections of other major sports websites.
Rather than predict teams based on the season ending today, or make wild predictions of the future, Bracketology 101 uses a unique "projection-prediction" method of selecting teams, giving fans a much more realistic idea of where their favorite teams stand in the eyes of the selection committee.
While other bracketologists favor conferences or teams or rely entirely on RPI rankings in making their picks, we factor in a team's resume as a whole - big wins, bad losses, in and out-of-conference wins, upcoming schedules, conference tournament sites, and each team's overall strengths and weaknesses compared to other teams on the bubble. Our "Field of 68" is updated every Monday throughout the season, with daily updates coming during Championship Week.

Join The B101 Team!

Do you want to advertise on Bracketology 101 during March Madness? Do you want to sponsor one of our upcoming daily brackets? E-mail us at bracketologyblog@yahoo.com for ad rates and details.

Follow B101 On Twitter

Bracketology 101 is now on Twitter! To follow B101 on Twitter, just click on the Twitter logo above.

How B101 Stacks Up

The numbers speak for themselves: Over the last five years, Bracketology 101 is the most accurate bracketology site on the Internet. We produced the best bracket in 2006, the second best in 2007 and 2008, and the fifth best in 2009. We are the only bracketologists to produce a Top 5 bracket four of the last five years. No other bracketologist has placed in the Top 5 more than twice. For a complete breakdown of our bracket stats from the last four years, click on the “We’re #1!” logo above.

The 40-60 Club

On top of correctly predicting 64 of the 65 tournament teams in 2008, Bracketology 101 also became the first bracketology site to ever seed 40 teams exactly and 60 teams within one seed line of their actual seed. Through 2010, we are the only bracketology site to earn this distinction.