Archive

The former breadbasket of Africa Rhodesia is now one of the worst countries on the continent. America helped the Niggers take over the country and kill the white farmers. Now look at the condition it is in. Hello Obama. Goodbye White America. Welcome poverty. Thank the Jews.

If you want to see hell on earth, go to Zimbabwe where the madman Robert Mugabe has brought the country to such a state of ruin that medical care for most of the inhabitants has all but ceased to exist.

Life expectancy in Zimbabwe is now the lowest in the world: 37 years for men and 34 for women. A cholera epidemic is raging. People have become ill with anthrax after eating the decaying flesh of animals that had died from the disease. Power was lost to the morgue in the capital city of Harare, leaving the corpses to rot.

Most of the world is ignoring the agony of Zimbabwe, a once prosperous and medically advanced nation in southern Africa that is suffering from political and economic turmoil — and the brutality of Mugabe’s long and tyrannical reign.

The decline in health services over the past year has been staggering. An international team of doctors that conducted an “emergency assessment” of the state of medical care last month seemed stunned by the catastrophe they witnessed. The team was sponsored by Physicians for Human Rights. In their report, released this week, the doctors said:

“The collapse of Zimbabwe’s health system in 2008 is unprecedented in scale and scope. Public-sector hospitals have been shuttered since November 2008. The basic infrastructure for the maintenance of public health, particularly water and sanitation services, have abruptly deteriorated in the worsening political and economic climate.”

Doctors and nurses are trying to do what they can under the most harrowing of circumstances: facilities with no water, no functioning toilets and barely any medicine or supplies. The report quoted the director of a mission hospital:

“A major problem is the loss of life and fetal wastage we are seeing with obstetric patients. They come so late, the fetuses are already dead. We see women with eclampsia who have been seizing for 12 hours. There is no intensive care unit here, and now there is no intensive care in Harare.

“If we had intensive care, we know it would be immediately full of critically ill patients. As it is, they just die.”

Mugabe’s corrupt, violent and profoundly destructive reign has left Zim-babwe in shambles. It’s a nation overwhelmed by poverty, the H.I.V./AIDS pandemic and hyperinflation. Once considered the “breadbasket” of Africa, Zimbabwe is now a country that cannot feed its own people. The unemployment rate is higher than 80 percent. Malnutrition is widespread, as is fear.

A nurse told the Physicians for Human Rights team: “We are not supposed to have hunger in Zimbabwe. So even though we do see it, we cannot report it.”

Mugabe signed a power-sharing agreement a few months ago with a political opponent, Morgan Tsvangirai, who out-polled Mugabe in an election last March but did not win a majority of the votes. But continuing turmoil, including violent attacks by Mugabe’s supporters and allegations that Mugabe forces have engaged in torture, have prevented the agreement from taking effect.

The widespread skepticism that greeted Mugabe’s alleged willingness to share power only increased when he ranted, just last month: “I will never, never, never surrender … Zimbabwe is mine.”

Meanwhile, health care in Zimbabwe has fallen into the abyss. “This emergency is so grave that some entity needs to step in there and take over the health delivery system,” said Susannah Sirkin, the deputy director of Physicians for Human Rights.

In November, the primary public referral hospital in Harare, Parirenyatwa Hospital, shut down. Its medical school closed with it. The nightmare that forced the closings was spelled out in the report:

“The hospital had no running water since August of 2008. Toilets were overflowing, and patients and staff had nowhere to void — soon making the hospital uninhabitable. Parirenyatwa Hospital was closed four months into the cholera epidemic, arguably the worst of all possible times to have shut down public hospital access. Successful cholera care, treatment and control are impossible, however, in a facility without clean water and functioning toilets.”

The hospital’s surgical wards were closed in September. A doctor described the heartbreaking dilemma of having children in his care who he knew would die without surgery. “I have no pain medication,” he said, “some antibiotics, but no nurses … If I don’t operate, the patient will die. But if I do the surgery, the child will die also.”

What’s documented in the Physicians for Human Rights report is evidence of a shocking medical and human rights disaster that warrants a much wider public spotlight, and an intensified effort to mount an international humanitarian intervention.

Some organizations are already on the case, including Doctors Without Borders and Unicef. But Zimbabwe is dying, and much more is needed.

One of the most controversial and frequently-viewed reports I’ve ever seen was posted on the Libertarian Socialist News website (http://www.overthrow.com/). The report, entitled “Whites Have Bigger Cocks Than Blacks“, has been the subject of much levity and even a certain amount of derision, particularly amongst more “highbrowed” people. Yet this essay, week after week, month after month, was the most viewed essay on the Overthrow site.

However, when the host kicked Overthrow off its server a couple of weeks ago, I was concerned that this report might become lost forever. Consequently, I captured the cached version, archived it here, and sat on it, waiting to see if the Overthrow site would be completely resurrected.

And to date, the site has not been completely resurrected. Since it is uncertain when Bill White will completely resurrect the site in its fulness, and restore all the old reports, I am re-posting the original essay, along with pertinent links and an analysis of the information (note that Bill White never posted a source link in the original).

Whites Have Bigger Cocks Than Blacks
Scientific Study Proves It

7/10/2005 7:21:13 PM
Discuss this story in the forum
LSN Staff

Science — A scientific study has proven that white men have bigger cocks than blacks, despite lies about black sexuality perpetrated in Jewish mass media and pornography.

According to the study, published in a Canadian scientific journal, white men’s average cock length is 6.4″, two tenths of an inch longer than black cocks, which are an average of 6.2″ long. Hispanic cocks are an average 6″ long, and East Asian cocks are an average of 5.6″ long.

For decades, whites have had to listen to the insulting and false derision of Jewish propaganda claiming that African barbarians have giant cocks that somehow make white women attracted to them. While very few white women are actually attracted to blacks, and most of those who are are mentally, emotionally, or physically defective in some way, this myth has been eagerly propagated by Jewish entertainment media, Jewish movies, Jewish music, and, most importantly, Jewish pornography.

Like all Jewish myths about black “superiority”, such as alleged black musical ability, alleged black dancing ability, alleged black sports ability, and alleged black entertainment ability, the myth of giant black cocks has been proven to be a racist lie designed by Jews to psychologically undermine white society.

To unsubscribe, you must go to the website and fill out the form in the upper left hand corner — the one that says “unsubscribe”.

Commentary: It is questionable whether there is a consistent correlation between race and penis size. A Google web search of the phrase “race+penis size” reveals that different surveys and references yield different results.

According to Sizesurvey.com, their findings support Bill White’s conclusion:

Since the release of the fifth edition, the number of Black and Hispanic participants has not substantially increased. Because of the continued low sample sizes therefore, the results reported below concerning the aforementioned groups must be considered tentative, pending a larger number of responses.

Surprisingly, it would appear from Figure 5 (posted above left), that contrary to popular myth, Black males have shorter erect lengths than their Caucasian counterparts. However, due to the small sample size and large variation in lengths, this “difference” is not statistically significant. The average flaccid length among Blacks however was 93.8mm (3.7″) compared to 87.7mm (3.4″) for Caucasians, which may be responsible for the impression that Black men have greater erect dimensions. Again, I emphasize that these observations must remain tentative.

There was a significant difference in length between Caucasians and both Hispanic and East Asians (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean or Vietnamese descent). Whereas with Hispanics, such a difference was limited to erect length only, with East Asians all five measurements were statistically lower in comparison to Caucasians. Although part of this difference may be due to the shorter stature of East Asians, height matched comparisons with Caucasian subjects nevertheless failed to alter this finding.

And a survey cited on the Answers.google.com website also seems to validate Bill White’s conclusion. While I could not find the specific scientific journal he cited, the numbers cited below correlate precisely with what White published in the original article. Consequently, he must have been referring to Masters & Johnson:

“This couldn’t be further from the truth. Based on a number of surveys (most notably Masters and Johnson), of thousands of men of many different races, white males actually have the largest penises. White males averaged an erect penis length of 6.4″ while black males averaged 6.2″. Hispanic men averaged 6.0″ and finally east Asian men bring up the rear with a meager 5.6”.

However, the Coolnurse.com website tells a different tale. According to their research, blacks are largest at 6.89 inches, followed by whites at 6.22 inches, Hispanics at 6.15 inches, and Asians at 5.33 inches.

Consequently, there is no consistent consensus on this issue. And that’s precisely what Wikipedia has to say about it – no correlation. However, in a sense, this does validate one of the other points that Bill White made in his original essay – that lurid tales of black sexual prowess and black “supercocks” were clearly exaggerated. Whites may not have bigger cocks than blacks, but blacks don’t have bigger cocks than whites, either.

Although Asians, for some reason, seem to come up short in nearly every survey.