Aims to defend the basic inherited Judao/Christian tone and fabric of Australian society at the national level (culturally not doctrinally). Aims to use persuasion and information to eliminate the threat of political Islam. Will engage in activism to prevent the expansion of any illegal activity aimed at expanding Islamic influence, and will seek to influence Law in pursuit of those aims. We will also highlight the threat of Green/Socialist undermining of Aussie society and Law.

koala-1

The Pen is mightier than the sword, but the Pen must sometimes move the sword against corruption if the corrupt are not moved by the pen.. An idea without an implementer is useless. "The Rulers do not carry the sword in vain"Rom 13:4

Friday, January 24, 2014

Jewish Sarah Silverman mocks Jesus and America!

I only say this because it's factual.. "Yet another Jew" is trying to destroy and undermine our culture.'
If it was only the occasional person, you would not notice it so much, but the leaders of the pack, the creative creatures who seem to have the most impact.. are, it seems, invariably Jewish.

Sarah Silverman is clearly a woman bereft of social conscience, and seems fixated on mocking the middle and mainstream America that is Christian. (albeit many are nominal).
Silverman has made an advertisement that seeks to derail the 'pro-life' movement's beliefs and undermine ideas that are contrary to her warped world view.

By invoking a 'plasticine' Jesus character, she puts words in his mouth that suit her own social and political agenda and she plays the part of a female being 'advised' by Jesus about when life starts.

The major point I wish to make here, is that Silverman would never dream of insulting and mocking Muhammad Islam's child abusing so called prophet. Why? Most likely because she retains the desire to live a long life. So, we should ask the question...'why' does she mock and ridicule Jesus the Christ and in so doing, insult, offend and humiliate on national TV their faith?

One can only conclude that Silverman has some kind of atavistic hatred for Christians, for Christ and for decency. She picks on the vulnerable Christian because she knows two things in her power base. Firstly she must know that seldom to Christians become violent in the defense of their faith. Secondly, being Jewish, and most likely feeling somehow separate from the 'goyim' gentile Americans, and having the media clout of Hollywood and the vast majority of Media outlets in her (Jewish) corner, and knowing that National Geographic, Discovery and other cable channels have repeatedly and relentlessly forced documentary after documentary down our viewing throats, that portray the Jews as victims and the "whites" as evil murdering capitalist tyrants.

Perhaps Silverman thinks she is safe from the unveiling of her Jewish background? She figures that people will be too scared to mention it for fear of being labelled "anti semitic". Not on my watch that's for sure!

This is not a coincidence, nor is it an isolated issue. Even the content and selection and emphasis, and the omission of vital information in most if not all of these pro semitic documentaries is structured to invariably portray the Jews only as victims and without any guilt whatsoever.
I put it to your reason, that when a group of people who share the same race and culture, organize themselves so as to promote their own interests at the expense of all others, then we have an organized, racist campaign at work.

Do you think I'm being a bit over the top here? Read on!

Dr Noel Ignatiev ...Jewish History professor formerly of Harvard wrote "Abolish the white race, by any means necessary" He is quoted in the Harvard magazine "Crimson" as saying this:

"Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white
males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social
construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed—not ‘deconstructed’ but
destroyed."

Or we could visit the 'adult' Industry and see what Jewish professor Nathan Abrams has to say about Jewish involvement in it: "Triple Ex-thnics". I tried to link to that journal article, but it seems to have been removed. (too volatile?) Not surprised it was amazingly confronting, but the essential facts and many others are found here.

Silverman should show us her real bravery and do a "Muhammad" version instead of taking cheap shots at humble Christians who leave it to the wrath of God to deal with such people as her.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Our Mission-Background.

History is marked with pivotal moments.

BATTLE for ROMEFor the Romans it was the appoinment of Fabius Maximus as temporary dictator in the face of repeated defeats by Hannibal of Carthage. Army after Roman army had been outwitted and slaughtered by Hannibals better tactics. Now he was at the gates of ROME itself. The decision to appoint Fabius saved Rome. He did not confront Hannibal face to face, but embarked on a geurilla war, scortched earth and attrition. Eventually Hannibal had to simply 'go away' because to stay would mean starvation for his army. Rome, was saved.

BATTLE OF TOURS 732In this battle, the rampaging Muslims from Spain sought to take over France. They slashed and burned their way through the Pyranee mountains and into Frankish territory, but were met by a much smaller but well trained and disciplined army of only infantry... led by Charles (The Hammer) Martel.The Muslims were driven away, soundly defeated, and France was saved.

BATTLE of VIENNA 1683 After a long Muslim siege and invasion, their hordes ended up at the gates of Vienna. The last major stronghold of European civilization was set to be swallowed by the ever advancing merciless Islamic juggernaut.over a hundred thousand Muslim soldiers were poised to strike. Jan III Sobieski, with his Polish cavalry came at the last moment.. "here comes the cavalry" and the Muslim Turks were sent packing never to return.....until now, by stealth and immigration and fertility rate.

Now... the time has come for those who can see the past, predict the future and process current events in that light, who can then choose strategies to influence the social order in the interests of all that is decent, pure and enduring. No such mission occurs in an ideological vacuum, it must have a source an underlying ideology. This blog is of the view that new people make good societies, not new systems. Some systems are more viable than others. Plato covers these in his 5 regimes. Rousseau tried his hand at it in his Social Contract, Robispierre tried it with the French Revolution, Marx thought he had the final answer, Hitler tried his final solution, and they all fell apart. If you begin with a flawed idea, you will end with a disfuntional society. The Enlightenment was in reality the endarkenment, opening human minds to so called 'reason'. But even then, Kant's view of what enlightenment is, was just one of around 50 contemporary viewpoints. No matter what else people think, there is only ONE viewpoint or 'law' so to speak which works. "Do for others as you would have them do for you"..it covers everything, except one. That 'one' is the source of motivation to do just that. If humanity is left to itself, the might is right. The one who has the authority for loving your neighbout is none other than He who said "Hear oh Israel".