Fans and artists alike are currently more than a little a displeased by the “Big Pool” method with which streaming services calculate how artists get paid. Here we explore an alternative method of calculating these royalties dubbed the “Ethical Pool Solution” which would allow listeners to direct royalties only to the artists that they actually listen to.

Subscription services are one of the few secular trends in the current economy that is not yet reactive to trade wars or interest rates.Subscription services are found in many areas of the economy, but music drives some of the big ones like Spotify, Amazon and especially the razor-and-razorblades plays like Apple.But per-stream royalties do not come close to making up for the CD and download royalties they cannibalize. Not only do subscription retail rates need to increase, but it’s also time for a major change in the way artist’s streaming royalties are calculated from what is essentially a market share approach to one that is more fair.

Artists’ dismal streaming royalties on music subscription services are largely based on a simple calculation:A per-stream payment derived from a share of the service’s revenue prorated by number of streams.Artists get a portion of a service’s monthly revenue (at least the revenue the service discloses) based on a ratio of your plays to all the plays.Your plays will always be a lot smaller than the total plays.(This is essentially what Sharky Laguana referred to as the “Big Pool.”)

It also must be said that stock analysts and venture investors always—always—blame “high” royalties for loss-making in music services.This misapprehension ignores high overhead such as Spotify’s 10 floors of 4 World Trade Center or high bonus payments such as Daniel Ek’s $1,000,000 bonus paid for failing to accomplish half of his incentive goals stated in the Spotify SEC documents.

Of course all these machinations happen behind the scenes. Fans are not aware and it’s virtually impossible for any label or publisher to tell an artist or songwriter what their per-stream rate is or is going to be.

Simply put, if a fan pays their subscription and listens to 20 artists in a month, that fan likely believes that their subscription is shared by those 20 artists and not by 200,000 artists, 99.99% of whom that fan never listened to and probably never will, similar to Sharky’s “Subscriber Pool.”

This is why some artists like Sharky Laguana (and their managers) have begun arguing for replacing the status quo with “user-centric” royalties that more directly correlate fan listening to artist payments. I have a version of this idea I call the “Ethical Pool.”

How Did We Get Here?

How in the world did we get to the status quo? The revenue share concept started in the earliest days of commercial music platforms.These services didn’t want to pay the customary “penny rate” (as is typical for compilation records, for example), because a fixed penny rate might result in the service owing more than they made–particularly if they wanted to give the music away for free to compete with massive pirate sites.

Paying more than you make doesn’t fit very well with a pitch for a Web 2.0, advertising driven model:All you can eat of all the world’s music for free or very little, or “Own Nothing, Have Everything,” for example. It also works poorly if you think that artists should be grateful to make any money at all rather than be pirated.

Revenue share deals for big stakeholders have some bells and whistles that leverage can get you, like per-subscriber minimums, conversion goals, top up fees, limits on free trials, cutbacks on “off the top” revenue reductions, and the percentage of revenue in the pool (50%—60%-ish). Even so, the basic royalty calculation in a revenue share model is essentially this equation calculated on a monthly basis:

(Net Revenue * [Your Streams/All Streams])

Or ([Net Revenue/All Streams] * Your Streams)

In other words all the money is shared by all the artists.

Sounds fair, right?

Wrong.First, all artists may be equal, but on streaming services, some are more equal than others.Regardless of the downside protection like per-subscriber or per-stream minima, the revenue share model has an inherent bias for the most popular getting the most money out of the “Big Pool.” (This is true without taking into account the unmatched.)

And of course it must be said that the more of those artists are signed to any one label, the bigger that label’s take is of the Big Pool.So the bigger the label, the more they like streaming.

Conversely, the smaller the label the lower the take.This is destructive for small labels or independent artists.That’s why you see some artists complaining bitterly about a royalty rate that doesn’t have a positive integer until you get three or four decimal places to the right.Why drive fans away from higher margin CDs, vinyl or permanent downloads to a revenue share disaster on streaming?

Yet it increasingly seems that we are all stuck with the nonsensical streaming revenue share model.

Do Fans Think It’s Wrong?

There’s nothing particularly nefarious about this—them’s the rules and rev share deals have been in place for many years, mostly because the idea got started when the main business of the recorded music business was selling high margin goods like CDs or even downloads.Low margin streaming didn’t matter much until the last couple years.

It was only a question of time until that high margin business died due to the industry’s willingness to accept fluctuating micropennies as compensation for the low-to-no margin streaming business.(I say “no margin business” because the costs of accounting for streaming royalties may well exceed the margin—or even the payable royalty—on a per-stream basis when all transaction costs are considered as Professor Coase might observe.)

So understand—the revenue share model is essentially a market share distribution.Which is fine, except that in many cases, and I would argue a growing number of cases, when the fans find about about it, the fans don’t like it.They pay their monthly subscription fee and they think their money goes to the artists they actually listen to during the month.Which is not untrue, but it is not paid in the ratio that the fan might believe. Fans could easily get confused about this and the Spotifys of this world are not rushing to correct that confusion.

Here’s the other fact about that rev share equation: over time, the quotient is almost certain to produce an ever-declining per-stream royalty.Why?

Simple.

If the month-over-month rate of change in revenue (the numerator) is less than the month-over-month rate of change in the total number of streams or sound recordings streamed on the service (the denominator), the per-stream rate will decline over those months.This is because there will be more recordings in later months sharing a pot of money that hasn’t increased as rapidly as the number of streams.

As the number of recordings released will always increase over time for a service that licenses the total output of all major and indie labels (and independent artists), it is likely that the total number of recordings streamed will increase at a rate that exceeds the rate of change of the net revenue to be allocated. If there are more recordings, it is also likely that there will be more streams.

So streaming royalties in the Big Pool model will likely (and some might say necessarily will) decline over time.That’s demonstrated by declining royalties documented in The Trichordist’s “Streaming Price Bible” among other evidence.

Share:

Get The Best Industry News, Data, Insider Commentary And More, Delivered Right To Your Inbox.

Despite all the controversy, a Kentucky radio station plays "Baby, It's Cold Outside" non-stop for hoursover the past weekend. John Legend told The Hollywood Reporter that hosting the Oscars is a "thankless job" but hasn't ruled out the possibility. The inescapable Cardi B markets herself to a new demographic - seniors - teaching them to dance during the latest "Carpool Karaoke." To celebrate Keith Richard's 75th birthday, USA Today has compiled a list of his "quirky quotes" over the years. To celebrate the song's 50th anniversary, Princess Cruises recruited performers like Aloe Blacc, Jack Johnson and Corinne Bailey Rae to perform "Sittin' On The Dock Of The Bay" by Otis Redding. Here it is: the Weezer "Saturday Night Live" skit:

Reigning Miss USA Sarah Rose Summers, who is attending the pageant competition in Thailand, noted on social media (alongside Miss Columbia and Miss Australia) that Miss Vietnam and Miss Cambodia do not speak English and the backlash has already begun. REO Speedwagon is donating proceeds from its upcoming Jan. 12-13 performances at the Kavli Theatre at Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza to those affected by the shooting at Thousand Oak, Calif.'s Borderline Bar & Grill (the show will include musical guests with ties to the area Richard Marx, Five For Fighting’s John Ondrasik, and Eddie Money). Neo-Nazis, likely in town for a rally, beat up an African-American DJ at a Seattle bar and were arrested for a hate crime. Tour buses for 98 Degrees, in town for a show, had to be moved from a Norwalk, Conn., Stop & Shop parking lot and all hell broke loose.

Honestly, this is unacceptable. Whenever 98 Degrees comes to Connecticut they should be treated like the kings they indisputably are. I'm sorry Nick. Please come back soon. https://t.co/BwsKIUSoU6 via @TheHourNews

Our friends Runaway June have released the video for their Christmas contribution "Sleigh Ride."

Despite all the controversy, a Kentucky radio station plays "Baby, It's Cold Outside" non-stop for hoursover the past weekend. John Legend told The Hollywood Reporter that hosting the Oscars is a "thankless job" but hasn't ruled out the possibility. The inescapable Cardi B markets herself to a new demographic - seniors - teaching them to dance during the latest "Carpool Karaoke." To celebrate Keith Richard's 75th birthday, USA Today has compiled a list of his "quirky quotes" over the years. To celebrate the song's 50th anniversary, Princess Cruises recruited performers like Aloe Blacc, Jack Johnson and Corinne Bailey Rae to perform "Sittin' On The Dock Of The Bay" by Otis Redding. Here it is: the Weezer "Saturday Night Live" skit:

Reigning Miss USA Sarah Rose Summers, who is attending the pageant competition in Thailand, noted on social media (alongside Miss Columbia and Miss Australia) that Miss Vietnam and Miss Cambodia do not speak English and the backlash has already begun. REO Speedwagon is donating proceeds from its upcoming Jan. 12-13 performances at the Kavli Theatre at Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza to those affected by the shooting at Thousand Oak, Calif.'s Borderline Bar & Grill (the show will include musical guests with ties to the area Richard Marx, Five For Fighting’s John Ondrasik, and Eddie Money). Neo-Nazis, likely in town for a rally, beat up an African-American DJ at a Seattle bar and were arrested for a hate crime. Tour buses for 98 Degrees, in town for a show, had to be moved from a Norwalk, Conn., Stop & Shop parking lot and all hell broke loose.

Honestly, this is unacceptable. Whenever 98 Degrees comes to Connecticut they should be treated like the kings they indisputably are. I'm sorry Nick. Please come back soon. https://t.co/BwsKIUSoU6 via @TheHourNews

CelebrityAccess provides unparalleled, detailed information on over 50,000 Entertainers, Speakers, Celebrities, and their representatives, as well as, hundreds of thousands of records for venues, agents and managers, including their direct phone numbers and email addresses. Members can also instantly access FREE Box Office Scores, dates of live bands on tour, artist avails and news archives.