I don't Recall the Left Denouncing Hate Crimes from Leftwing Groups...

More lies. She did not advocate riots and bloodshed. She is talking about protests which are our constitutional rights. Remember when Martin Luther
King organized the march in Selma? Remember who was being injured and bleeding on those marches? It wasn't the cops.

More lies. She did not advocate riots and bloodshed. She is talking about protests which are our constitutional rights. Remember when Martin Luther
King organized the march in Selma? Remember who was being injured and bleeding on those marches? It wasn't the cops.

Regarding Sanger, her birth control clinics were put into place only to help poor women who were BEGGING for knowledge on how to prevent unwanted
pregnancies. She never forced anyone into her clinics - women from poor neighborhoods were lined up outside the door by the hundreds in the early
days. She filled a very important need.

Also, she was NOT a fan of abortions, per her 1938 autobiography. She advocated prevention instead.

So in the massive crowd of protestors below...some guy got shouted at? Some guy got hit with a sign!?? and someone threw some rocks??

A self proclaimed Nazi and avid Trump Supporter ran people over in Charlottesville and killed a woman.
The organizer of that hate rally has since stated she was a pig that deserved to die.
And posters on this thread have echoed the sentiments.

Trump only managed to muster that their was some violent people and good people on both sides...
A statement David Duke has applauded along with other Neo-Nazi's..

Hey you left out "the black panthers" during obama we had the "Blm" and black panthers, am I right? Is it two different groups, or the same people?

None the less I totally agree. Obama and Clinton called for uprising and violence. Sooooo many times obama, "the abomination" is what he is --could
have came on the air and asked for a stop to the violence and uprising. But Noooooo he didn't because this is what their wanting! They want a race
war, or civil war they don't care they just want it!

People are too stupid to see what their doing and just do it! Blind, everyone's blind!

So in the massive crowd of protestors below...some guy got shouted at? Some guy got hit with a sign!?? and someone threw some rocks??

A self proclaimed Nazi and avid Trump Supporter ran people over in Charlottesville and killed a woman.
The organizer of that hate rally has since stated she was a pig that deserved to die.
And posters on this thread have echoed the sentiments.

Trump only managed to muster that their was some violent people and good people on both sides...
A statement David Duke has applauded along with other Neo-Nazi's..

Either stop the BS or own how you feel.

Again, if you chose to characterize as what happened in boston as one person getting shouted at, that your right.

I feel the evidence speaks for itself.

It was tragic that that girl was murdered by a racist scum bag. Nothing at charlottesville or boston even comes close to that.

That doesn't mean we can't condemn violence from all sides when we see it though.

The media and others calling the boston protest a victory for love over hate, and screaming at anyone trying to caall out both sides violence in
charolettesville only emboldens that side to commit more violence.

Using the NAACP as an appeal to authority fallacy is nothing at all like purchasing a consumer product.

RE: Byrd...the only real account is his own. He claims to have left in 1943, 3 years after founding his chapter by recruiting 150 people to join him.
But in 1945 he was still publicly stating his disdain for african americans, when he spoke out against desegregation in the military.

Pointing to a press release is an appeal to authority? Well, strictly speaking probably so, but then, every reference or citation is therefore the
same "appeal" and therefore ... kind of invalidates the concept of a fallacy, eh?

But let's take you as the "authority" on Byrd. So ... he was, according to you, still making racist comments in 1945.

Yes... I am in COMBAT with P.C.semantics in general but it is difficult to define civilian's populist factions ,MARXIST doesn't for instance cover
terms like aiding and abetting enemies or even really goes so lo as to take advantage of the dumber elements of our urban sprawls ,like the term
PROGRESSIVE or Prog...why?

Yes... I am in COMBAT with P.C.semantics in general but it is difficult to define civilian's populist factions ,MARXIST doesn't for instance cover
terms like aiding and abetting enemies or even really goes so lo as to take advantage of the dumber elements of our urban sprawls ,like the term
PROGRESSIVE or Prog...why?

Well, it's a logical loop.

You stated that only PROGS are absolute collectivists ... but by lumping all "PROGS" together, you're creating an absolute collectivist comment ...
which is either false, or makes you a PROG.

a reply to: Gryphon66
THAT is what a socialist resistance Alinsky deflection says, to Constitutional values for the purpose of undermining them,alone.
NOT a semantic break down of what was said by college reading levels:...as I determined, the subject (Progs) and the adjectives BASED on MY
interpretation of the subjects chosen language.
But you MISS a great deal so I don't really EXPECT much.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Gryphon66
THAT is what a socialist resistance Alinsky deflection says, to Constitutional values for the purpose of undermining them,alone.
NOT a semantic break down of what was said by college reading levels:...as I determined, the subject (Progs) and the adjectives BASED on MY
interpretation of the subjects chosen language.
But you MISS a great deal so I don't really EXPECT much.

Goodness at the buzzwords. "Socialist" and "Alinsky" and so forth ... undermining "Constitutional principles"?? And a semantic breakdown, LOL, is
that a dance? Pointing out what you said is undermining the Constitution? Wow.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.