Pages

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

This is a re-post from the ...Ad for Obama Records blog. I listened to this broadcast, last weekend and join them in suggesting it. I.O. also suggests we find out more about Mario Apuzzo and his eligibility action, Kerchner v. Obama (also logged in TRSoL and documented here). Lead plaintiff, Charles Kerchner is also on the program. Let us learn more about Mr. Kerchner, too. I.O's blessings to all who stand up for the necessity of constitutional integrity.

The initial interview is with Stephen Pidgeon, attorney for the Broe v Reed eligibility case, apparently stalled at this moment, after being denied by the Washington state Supreme Court. Mr. Pidgeon has important announcements about the evils of proposed "hate crimes" legislation.

Politics and current events with Momma E taking your calls and defending the truth. There will be an Attorney that will give us some updates on what he is going to do to continue the fight against Obama. I am going to keep the first Attorney's name quite until the Show. The last Guests will be the lead Plaintiff in the Kerchner v Obama case that was just filed on the 20th and his Attorney Mario Apuzzo!! Click here to listen.

6 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Thanks.I wanted to hear this one.He was on longer than I had heard.Blogtalk player has static since they changed things last month,but default player works.But then you get stuck with thumbnail pics you have to delete.

Steve was on an entire segment and didn't abruptly hang up as we were led to believe.Glad he mentioned the calling for repentance.Barry is moving swiftly,and we are going to pay dearly if we remain silent of state sanctioned filth and slaughter.Don't know much about Apuzzo,except he has spent much time in long posts trying to help Orly.Can't find archive of 1-25 show where Ed made new promise.Post link in open thread if possible.In fact,you could bump that thread to the sidebar at top right for easy access.

Mario Puzzo's Military suit just had a motion to dismiss regarding, once again, the "Standing" issue. Why does “injury in fact” have to be “injury to one’s person?” The law is clear that an injury can be to one’s constitutional rights.

I am not even a lawyer and I am certain that I could come up with a creative way to get around this “Standing Issue.”

Please read this post and maybe there is something that can help YOU and other attorneys come up with some creative legal maneuvers by using the Department of Justice’s “How To Prosecute Election Fraud Manual” against them: http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-the-attorney-general

More sections may apply that may offer Puzzo and other attorneys a creative way of overcoming the "Standing" issue.

In the Conspiracy Against Rights. 18 U.S.C. § 241, Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States” under color of law.

Section 241 has been an important statutory tool in election crime prosecutions. Originally held to apply only to schemes to corrupt elections.

Section 241 does not require that the conspiracy be successful, nor any PROOF of an overt act.

Section 241 embrace conspiracies intended to injure because an injury does NOT really even need to occur?

Why does an “injury have to be a physical injury?” Why can’t it be injury to one’s mental and emotional state? Why not an injury to one’s confidence in government?

I don’t understand why this doesn’t matter apply to these cases and why attorneys continue to do the SAME THING over and over again seem to expect to have DIFFERENT results?

Thanks for update Jean.We have been injured and should have standing.Back in the day...the Kings had only 40 days to address redress of grievances and provide a remedy to the people.These days we are serfs that beieve we are still free.All the planks of the Communist Manifesto were eased into our system over the course of seven decades.

I agree, and for those of you who don't know what you are talking about in regard's to the Planks of Communism, please read this blog post: http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/is-communism-already-happening

I am not stating that section 241 will be the winning arguement, like I said, I am not even an attorney, and for that reason, sometimes, someone like me, may be able to see things that others don’t or may be able to offer a suggestion that a skilled attorney can run with.

The DOJ manual on how to prosecute Election Crimes and Fraud is 384 pages. There is a link to it in my original post, which is a letter that I had sent prevously sent to the DOJ and FBI regarding this matter.

My only purpose in bringing this up at all, was to stress that point, that the attorneys that are filing these lawsuits have to “start thinking out of the box.” The arguments that are being used, continually seems to fail, case after case.

This reminds me of a story I heard long ago. It was the story of a truck that was stuck under an overpass and a number of engineers were called in to figure out how to get the truck out. The truck was completely wedged under the overpass and the top part of the truck was partially crushed.

The engineers began to scratch their heads, one suggested that they would should bring in equipment to lift the overpass, another suggested that the top section of the truck would have to be cut off. Then a little boy riding his bike came up to the scene and informed the engineers that if they let the air out of the truck’s tires, the truck would fall lower than the overpass and it could be rolled out. And, presto, the problem of the stuck truck was solved, by a little boy that was looking at the problem with a fresh set of eyes.

I am not trying to belittle or minimize the legal work that is being done or the legal arguments that are being made. I am only trying to look at the legal arguments with a “fresh set of eyes,” and make observations that may help someone try a “new approach.” Something that could make the “lightbulb” go on in someone’s head, so they start to think “outside of the box.”

My only pupose in writing the original comment is to ask, “If we let air out of the tires, could we make a better case?”

Free to Post

You are free to post original I.O. articles, written by Arlen Williams, on other sites, in their entirety or good context, linking to this site. New entries may not be frequent, but articles are meant to be significant. Some entries may become updated.

About Investigating Obama

The campaign for America to understand Barack Obama goes on. Facts are documented in the original articles, via Web links to valid sources. Factual dots are connected with historically informed reason. Original postings may not be frequent, but are intended for value. The views and statements expressed by Investigating Obama contributors, and in quotations and citations, and linked sites are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Investigating Obama and Arlen Williams.

If you want to know how this blog came to be, you may wish to read, "Investigating Obama?"Believe Barack Obama, when he says he wants to fundamentally transform America and to change the world.

Pray and work effectively, for an authentic America, for all Americans, and a free world. Consider what others have sacrificed for these.

PS: I know movement politics very well. Dedicated activists with shared motives, goals, and objectives coordinate their activities. They communicate regularly and operate together in their roles, or movements do not move. "History is the history of conspiracy," whether for good or ill.

The Word of God is Against Socialism and Marxist Lies

Ecclesiastes 3:9-15

What profit has the worker from that in which he labors? I have seen the God-given task with which the sons of men are to be occupied. He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also He has put eternity in their hearts, except that no one can find out the work that God does from beginning to end.

I know that nothing is better for them than to rejoice, and to do good in their lives, and also that every man should eat and drink and enjoy the good of all his labor -- it is the gift of God. I know that whatever God does, it shall be forever. Nothing can be added to it, and nothing taken from it. God does it, that men should fear before Him. That which is has already been, and what is to be has already been; and God requires an account of what is past.

Larry Grathwohl spoke of his work as a federal
investigator assigned to penetrate Bill Ayers' and Bernardine Dohrn's Weathermen -- the bombings and the deaths -- and a new possibility for prosecution. Also discussed: the entire Marxist network in America, right up to Barack Obama.

Notice about Comments

It has been my privilege that I.O. has received many excellent comments. However, I do not have time to address arguments posted by a few perpetual arguers.

If I.O. refers to you and you decide to comment, that is very fair and appreciated. Otherwise, posts which flout the evidence about Barack Obama provided by I.O. and are not found to be helpful, are subject to deletion.

"You are welcome." ;-) AW, I.O.

To the Hillary Voting PUMA's

America needs you. The overriding political contest is now between Americanists and anti-Americanists (Marxists, Islamists, racists, etc.).

Thank you for sticking to your guns (and religion ;-) in opposing the insurgency represented by Barack Obama and his comrades.

I hope you may accept that America was founded upon our Creator endowed rights and that chief among these is the Right to Life. I hope you will not be uncomfortable with those who point out some unfortunate similarities between HRC and BHO.

You are welcomed with open arms. Please help us keep them -- ammunition, too.

(And please don't be put on the spot. I may write a note down here for conventional party folk and independents, too.)

To Those of Deviant Views, Philosophy & Character:

To the Marxists, racists, and bigots who read this page, or who link to it -- to any with a un-American attitude of whatever kind -- you are welcome to read and you are welcome to repent of the sins of these defiled views. Seek the light, while it shines for you.

To Anyone Out There Who May Be Considering Bad Behavior

Do not be a fool. We still have a Constitution we must fight for, by constitutional means. In our nation, a criminal act for political motive is a further attack upon the Constitution and our own American principles. We may defend ourselves and our castles. We must not give away the moral high ground.

Repeal, Replace, Renew, Restore -- and Repent

“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.”- Vladimir Lenin1,2,3

Individual freedom is the only freedom - I.O.Stand strong against the authoritarian and totalitarian tyrannies of Marxism, fascism, Islamism and every one-world government ideology -- whether from Moscow, Brussels, Rome, Mecca, Beijing, or New York.

Under God, We Sovereign American People stand for government only as We have mandated in our Constitution and for the overriding principles of our Declaration.Further, we must repent of sloth in allowing organized efforts, that are anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property rights, and anti-American in their very denial of individual responsibility to God, to dominate American education, media, and now, finance, manufacturing and commerce.

Obama has followersI.O. has compatriots

Obama's Progenitor in Neo-Marxism, Saul Alinsky, on "Change"

There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary CHANGE must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward CHANGE among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution. To bring on this reformation requires that the organizer work inside the system, among not only the middle class but the 40 per cent of American families - more than seventy million people - whose income range from $5,000 to $10,000 a year (in 1971).