The background history of this case goes something like this:
In the 1960s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada's most eastern province
was also Canada's poorest. Fortunately, Newfoundland had a river
in Labrador with great hydroelectric potential it wanted to develop and
sell the power to the New England States. Unfortunately, the only
way to get the power to market was to build a power line through
Quebec. So the Newfoundland Government set up a company called NALCOR
to develop the project and negotiate a 'deal' with Hydro Quebec--and
NALCOR was financed by the Rothschilds -- Alarm bells now should ring!

Anyway here's the deal they signed in 1969, when energy was
cheap with oil at two dollars a barrel: Newfoundland would sell the
power to Quebec for $10 million dollars a year, and Quebec would sell
it to the US--and the deal was signed for 60 years. It seemed
like a good deal at the time; however, a few years later, the energy
crises hit and Quebec made billions off the deal while Newfoundland,
Canada's poorest province, got screwed. Quebec makes a billion
dollars a year while Newfoundland only gets ten million!

Needless to say, the people of Newfoundland came to resent and
even hate Quebec for this injustice. In 1988, the Newfoundland
government even tried to challenge the contract in the Supreme Court of
Canada but the court ruled in Quebec's favour.

All through it all, Quebec's line is that a contract is a
contract--especially since they already resented Newfoundland for being
granted ownership over Labrador based on a decision of the British
Privy Council in 1929(the same Privy Council that gave the Northern BC
coast to the US)--Quebec believes they really own Labrador

and that THEY got screwed in 1929.

Now recently, the Premier of Quebec, alluded that it might be
possible for Newfoundland to get some justice by suing Hydro Quebec in
a Quebec Civil Court, and Newfoundland has decided to take the bait,
which in my view, could be the beginning of the end of Canada.

The judge in Quebec's Court will be facing a very major
dilemma: He could rule that the case was already decided by Canada's
Supreme court; hence, Quebec is in the right.

But if he does this, Quebec is acknowledging Canadian
authority, and it could inflame the separatist movement in the next
provincial election.

However, if the the Judge rules in Newfoundland's favour,
which is very likely to happen, then all of Quebec may want to separate
from Canada. they'll elect a separatist government and a third
referendum will be held and be successful this time. (The last
referendum in 1995 only lost by less then one percent)

So there you have it: use this issue to make Quebec voters
believe they got screwed by Canada, and within five years they vote to
secede. When Quebec leaves Canada, the country is then
geographically cut off from the four eastern provinces. Richer
western provinces like BC and Alberta will then separate, Ontario will
separate, and the remaining provinces will probably end up as American
states, with the three richer ones soon to follow for the sake of unity
and military protection.

And the suit is being launched by NALCOR--a Rothschild
financed conglomerate!

Does this mean the Rothschilds were screwed by Quebec too?

No, Definitely not, it was part of their greater plan--what's
a hundred billion a year when you already own half the world?--for all
I know, they probably also financed Hydro Quebec--they probably own
both companies and using them in their little chess game, like in 1914,
and 1939etc, etc..It's not a bad deal for them since they already own
the whole pot,

it's just a bad deal for Newfoundland, and possibly for
Canada.

......and a comment..........

Vic said (March 2, 2010):

They do want Canada to break up - Ben Fulford says the oil
companies are paying Harper to break up so that they can grab the oil
from Oilberta -- Harper didn't mind when Quebec declared it was a
country inside of Canada.