Hotel CCTV Video of 9/11 Pentagon Explosion... And NO Plane!

This video of Pentagon explosion on 9/11, was taken by a CCTV Hotel camera in Arlington near the Pentagon. During the frames and the explosion there
is no Plane or Boeing 757. This is cctv video seized by the FBI released by the US District Court of Eastern Virginia.

Hmmm.....

How many times do you seen the planes that struck the Twin Towers?
And... How many times do you seen the plane that struck the Pentagon?

The video seems to have captured the non-impacted side of the building, so maybe the plane is shielded by the building? It is hard to tell if it is a
plane moving along or just traffic. My question is, if the video shows the wrong side of the building, why confiscate it? That is just fueling the
conspiracy theories.

After taking another look, even if the video is filming the wrong wall, there is no way a huge jet couldn't be seen. Plus the video seems to be
edited, the black car goes backwards after going forward. No trusting it after the feds got a hold of it.

The Pentagon is behind the overpass. That's why you don't see what causes the explosion. I'm not saying a plane hit the Pentagon, I'm just
explaining why this video isn't evidence of anything other than an explosion at the Pentagon.

This thread is going to be HUGE.
Even though it's on the opposite side,
we should still see a plane right?
Unless the airliner was lower than the height of the Pentagon
for the last mile of its flight. Good Ol Dave will be here shortly.

And I can see why the FBI went ahead with the court ordered
release, this won't raise an eyebrow from the average casual viewer.
Now they can say "See, we've released two ( of what ? 20+ cameras )
videos now."
Neither show a plane.

Originally posted by filosophia
The video seems to have captured the non-impacted side of the building, so maybe the plane is shielded by the building? It is hard to tell if it is a
plane moving along or just traffic. My question is, if the video shows the wrong side of the building, why confiscate it? That is just fueling the
conspiracy theories.

After taking another look, even if the video is filming the wrong wall, there is no way a huge jet couldn't be seen. Plus the video seems to be
edited, the black car goes backwards after going forward. No trusting it after the feds got a hold of it.

edit on 26-11-2012 by filosophia
because: (no reason given)

There was no plane wreckage discovered at the Pentagon dude...WAKE UP ALREADY!

Watch the second playthrough in full screen. You can see what appears to be the tail of a plane moving along the road, and almost exactly as it
disappears off the road, the explosion occurs.

Will do. Thanks for that.
I'm reviewing again.

Ok I see something but it's a can of worms either way.
An unexperienced pilot flying an extremely sophisticated 757 feet above the ground
at 500 miles an hour? or is it a drone or missle?

All I know is if I'm in an accident in any intersection
in just about any town I'll have at least 4 different views
recorded on video in much better quality.
But at the Pentagon in a major metropolitan city we get this?
It's a bit odd. If there is a plane, the FBI should pick from their lot of videos
and show one.

There is something moving toward the building, and you can see part of that above the building before the explosion. However, I personally think that
whatever it is is moving too slowly to be a jet, and you would see more of the jet than that. It would have to be almost taxiing along the ground at
hundreds of miles an hour for it not to be visible, and that just isn't plausible to me.

I'm not saying there was no plane, and I'm not saying there was. It just doesn't make much sense at all.

I have to ask though, if someone went to all the trouble to get planes packed with passengers hitting the towers for all to see, and they want to
claim that one hit the Pentagon, why NOT just do the same at the Pentagon?

Why would they use real jets in one incident, and then risk their story being totally destroyed by using something else at the Pentagon? It makes no
sense to do that.

I am adamant, after all that I have seen and read about the incidents, that three planes hit three buildings, and one was taken down in a field. What
I argue about is who was behind it, who ALLOWED IT to happen for their own needs, and who covered up what in the aftermath.

IMO, Mossad did this to force the USA into Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran... They did this to create mass hysteria against their Islamic enemies, and
some in the US allowed it to happen in order to make a hell of a lot of money for themselves.

There are just FAR too many things about these events that do not make any sense. There is too much evidence to show that some in the US (in senior
positions) knew something was happening, and that some very wealthy people made a hell of a lot of money off the back of this too.

Always follow the money and always see who benefits the most.

Incidentally, Bin Laden was a US asset for many years. Isn't it just a little strange that a man who made a career through the support of a
government would suddenly go solo? No, he just switched who he was working for.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.