Irving's Use of Ambiguity

In that same biography one finds undisguised antisemitic passages,
but it is left ambiguous whether they refer to Goring's or to
Irving's outlook. A story is told there of a 'benefactor' who lets
Goring's parents and their son live with him in his sumptuous castle.
But the man's generosity is deceptive: he keeps a suite of his own
right next to rooms assigned to Goring's mother. Surprise, surprise:
the interloper is a Jew! And added to the sexual stereotype there is
a financial one: the later Nazi chieftain's pomposity and greed are
explained by
Irving as having arisen from Goring's erstwhile
closeness to this Jewish 'stepfather'!

Similarly, in Hitler's War the chapter 'Clutching at Straws' has
Hitler and his Foreign Minister Ribbentrop arm-twisting Hungary's
Regent Horthy to gain compliance with the policy of extermination:

The Nazis found it intolerable that eight hundred thousand Jews
should still be moving freely around a country im the heart of
Europe--particularly just north of the sensitive Balkans. For
many months Germany had applied pressure for the Hungarian Jews to
be turned over to the appropriate German agencies [!]<54> for
deportation to 'reservations in the east.' It was argued that so
long as they remained, they were potential rumor mongers,
purveyors of defeatism, saboteurs, agents of the enemy secret
service, and contact men for an 'international Jewry' now
embattled against Germany.

By creating an ambiguity of voices--who speaks here, Hitler,
Ribbentrop or
Irving? --the impression is given that Hungary's Jews
were in fact nothing less than saboteurs and enemy agents. If only
they had had the opportunity to be saboteurs! If only that imaginary
power of 'international Jewry' had been able to shield them against
Hungarian Fascist gangs hunting them for
Eichmann's 'resettlement'
machine! If only they had not needed the Swedish diplomat
Wallenberg, with his brave and ingenious stratagems, to hide those he
could, and even to pull some of them off
Auschwitz-bound cattle cars!

Irving's Use of Innuendo

The same chapter continues, with the Führer and his chieftains
developing their crazed visions of Jewish evil incarnate:

Events in Poland were pointed to as providing an ugly precedent:
there were reports of Jews roaming the country, committing acts of
murder and sabotage. The eviction of the Jews ordered by Hitler
had recently been intensified in Himmler's order that even those
Jews left working for armament concems ... were to be housed
collectively in camps and eventually to be got rid of as well. In
Warsaw, the fifty thousand Jews surviving in the ghetto were on
the point of staging an armed uprising with weapons and
ammunition<55> evidently sold to them by Hitler's fleeing allies
as they passed westward through the city. Himmler ordered the
ghetto destroyed and its ruins combed out for Jews, saying 'This
is just the kind of incident that shows how dangerous these Jews
are.'

Where is
Irving's evidence for 'weapons and amrnunition evidently
sold to them by Hitler's fleeing allies'? There was in fact no such
sale nor could there have been. Jews planning the uprising were
penned down in the ghetto and faced enormous obstacles trying to
obtain any weapons at all, even light ones, even from the Polish
underground armies. This kind of innuendo runs through much of
Irving's history.

Irving Alters the Sequence of Events

In the Goring chapter 'Sunshine Girl and Crystal Night' there is a
scandalous inversion of the actual events, making it seem as if the
murder of vom Rath had been in response to Poland's closing its doors
against Polish Jews, rather than in response to Nazi Germany's having
expelled to Poland thousands of former Polish Jews. Here is
Irving's
version of the events:

Nobody wanted Europe's Jews. When Jews who had emigrated from
Poland began to flood back there in alarm, their own Warsaw
government passed a law designed to keep them out. A furious
Polish Jew stormed the German embassy in Paris and pumped bullets
into the ambassador's deputy, an impulsive action that was the
beginning of the Jews' long journey into darkness, because a
vengeful speech by Goebbels triggered a pogrom throughout Germany
and Austria--a dusk of agonizing screams, of arson, and of
shattered shop windows that would go down in history as 'Crystal
Night.'

The New York Times reported these events as follows:

the violence
was unleashed after the assassination of Ernst vom Rath, Third
Secretary of the German Embassy in Paris. The killer was a teenaged
Polish Jew, Herschel Grynszpan. He said that he was avenging the
treatment of his parents in Germany. 'Being a Jew is not a crime,'
Grynszpan told police in Paris. 'I am not a dog. I have a right to
live and the Jewish people have a right to exist on this earth.
Wherever I have been, I have been chased like an animal.

Those terrible words--Nazi Germany did hold that being a Jew was a
crime in itself--are not reflected in
Irving's statement. Herschel
Grynszpan's elderly parents were among the thousands who were dumped,
without food or shelter, in beginning winter weather in no-man's-land
between Germany and Poland.

Germany deported thousands of Polish Jews to Poland on October 28.
Vom Rath was shot on November 7. The nation- wide '
Kristallnacht'
pogrom was unleashed on German and Austrian Jews November 9-10,1938.

Irving omits the fact that the expulsion of Polish-born Jews,
resident in Germany, had preceded Poland's closing of her border.
Beginning his paragraph with 'Nobody wanted Europe's Jews' he
implicitly justifies not only Nazi Germany's dastardly act, but
simultaneously also Poland's.<56>

This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and
to combat hatred.
Any statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.

As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may
include on this website materials, such as excerpts from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and
provides them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers of these pages to condemn racist
and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.