I've asked y'all to stop doing this. A revolver is a pistol. A semi-automatic is a pistol. One is a revolver, one is a semi-automatic. I showed y'all the dictionary definition of "pistol" and while back, and it does not distinguish between revolvers, semis, single shots, etc.

Look, if the .38 special was worth a tinker's damn, Glock would make a handgun chambered for it. Since you can't get a Glock in that caliber, it must be no dang good. Who ever heard of anyone getting killed by a wimpy little .38 special, out a revolver, of all things.

I've asked y'all to stop doing this. A revolver is a pistol. A semi-automatic is a pistol. One is a revolver, one is a semi-automatic. I showed y'all the dictionary definition of "pistol" and while back, and it does not distinguish between revolvers, semis, single shots, etc.

It's very annoying.

You missed the point of my comment....I'll let you figure it out.

__________________
Never waste time deciding between two guns....buy both of them.

Look, if the .38 special was worth a tinker's damn, Glock would make a handgun chambered for it. Since you can't get a Glock in that caliber, it must be no dang good. Who ever heard of anyone getting killed by a wimpy little .38 special, out a revolver, of all things.

Well if a .22 can kill someone, a .38 special easily could...and not everyone loves glock either.

Look, if the .38 special was worth a tinker's damn, Glock would make a handgun chambered for it. Since you can't get a Glock in that caliber, it must be no dang good. Who ever heard of anyone getting killed by a wimpy little .38 special, out a revolver, of all things.

Glock doesn't have the technology to make revolvers.....

__________________
Never waste time deciding between two guns....buy both of them.

Sorry if I misconstrued your comment . . . it's just that's one of my major pet peeves. It makes me want to grab the person who does uses those terms and pistol-whip them. Or revolver-whip them, whatever the case may be.