How the Colonists Broke Away from the British

The colonists were in every right waging war and breaking away from the British. Not only was this justified but it was about time that they stood up for themselves and actually took action against the British. For instance, the colonist had no say in any governmental matters when it came to the British. They had every right to come apart and take over their own government. Moreover, they were being taxed an absurd amount of money for everything they did. Furthermore, why should the colonists be forced to pay for a war that they didn't even fight? It was time to take control. Additionally, Britain’s policy of salutary neglect, or a healthy ignoring of the colonies, gave them the chance of gaining more independence in their trade practices which made them want to become completely sovereign. Lastly, in the social aspect there was a separation of 3,000 miles between Great Britain and America, which led to a sense of self sufficiently and independence in the colonist.

Document 2 supports the idea that the colonies were vindicated in breaking away from Britain. The policy of mercantilism, the belief that colonies were established for the benefit of the mother country, played a major role in the colonies endeavor for freedom. The excerpts from, Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, by John Dickinson found in document 2 object the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts. The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 requiring a tax stamp on printed material, from newspapers to wills. In 1767 Parliament passed the Townshend Acts which taxed imports. Document 2 reveals the opposition of internal taxes, where producing revenue is the only objective. Dickinson specifically opposed those acts but there were many more influencing a revolution. Such as the Navigation Acts which forced colonists to trade with Britain and its possessions. Parliament imposed customs duties, or tariffs, to enforce the regulations. This act along with the Sugar Act caused smuggling among the colonies, importing...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...conflict called the Seven Year's War ended in resounding victory for the British Empire, which smashed its European rivals to emerge from the conflict as one of the largest and most powerful empires in world history. During the war the British and Americans became a unifying force standing side by side, but short while later they were the ones in conflict with one another. England was left with an even larger debt, from the French and Indian War, than what they had started with. To compensate Britain started to heavily tax the colonies which lead to many events such as the Boston Massacre and boycott of British goods. But in this time period it was always England changing older policies and colonists complying with them. The colonists never strongly pursued the idea of independence, only to become a larger more representative force in England. The British were truly the revolutionaries leading up to the Revolutionary War, rather than the colonists, as seen by England's significant change on America's trading/taxing policies, and the colonists strong will to stay with old tradition until the very last moment.
Eager southern farmers were speculating land grab, once the Seven Year's War was over, wanting to expand their plantations to the backgrounds of Kentucky and Tennessee. But England afraid of increased costs due to conflict with...

...Yes, the colonists were justified in waging war and breaking awayfrom Britain.
Thomas Whately, advisor to George Grenville, the British chancellor of the Exchequer, was correct by saying in Document 1, "We are not yet recovered from a war solely fought for their protection." Whately was referring to the French and Indian War (1754-1763). This war indeed cost Britain much, and I do believe the colonists were greatful. However, Britain, after 1763, did not allow the colonists to move west. The colonies were increasing by becoming crowded. New taxes angered them as well. Not being represented in Parliament was tyranny. "Taxation without Representation" was the battle cry. The Stamp Act of 1765 started it all. Every paper, from playing cards to legal documents were taxed. Document 2 refers to this tax as well as the Townsend Act which required the colonists to pay a tax on all British goods. According to Document 2, this taxes purpose was for simply "Levying money upon us". Still, this tax like the Stamp Act, was levied without representation in Parliament. Colonists boycotted British goods in favor of their own manufactured goods. The 13 colonies were gradually becoming aware of self-government. Men like Patrick Henry and John Dickinson considered these taxes unconstitutional. They voiced their opinions...

...
Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking awayfrom Britain ?
The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they tried all diplimatical options that they had by sending letters. When they didn’t work then they had no other means but to declare war.
It was said and is very true, that the British gave a lot to the colonists and we see such helpings as in the French and Indian war. The British gave up a lot of troops and money and numerous others in fighting that war that the least that the colonist could do is to pay the taxes. Well they do have a good right to say that since they were the contributing factor in the colonists being safe from the French and Indians. The people in the end should go about daily lives and pay the normal taxes but you do have to draw the line somewhere.
The American colonists...

...
History is written by the victors. Since America won the Revolutionary War, United States history explains and interprets the war and its causes from an ethnocentric view. Had the war been won by the British, the views would be quite different. Both countries often threaten the other; at other times they were conciliatory. The causes for the Revolutionary War are well documented from an American perspective. But what about the British perspective? This paper will assess and analyze the causes of the Revolutionary War from the British viewpoint.
Encouraged by successful wars in the Americans, Africa, and India, English leaders imagined a new sort of empire. Instead of the freely governed commercial organization of the past, they promoted centralized supervision by Parliament. Responding to resulting American displeasure, Lord Halifax declared, the colonists feel "entitled to a greater measure of Liberty than is enjoyed by the people of England."
In Britain, the French and Indian War created a vast debt. This impelled King George III and his administrators to further the English fiscal and military state of the colonies. Parliament swiftly substituted salutary neglect -- that had emphasized trade and local self-government -- with the imperial system -- that focused on taxation and regulation. English generals and colonial leaders differed on military policy. The...

...
British Colonist’s Pathway to U.S. Citizen
British Americans traveled far and wide with hope for a better tomorrow. Hope for owning land, growing crops, achieving wealth was on the forefront of the colonist’s minds. British men and women left behind old lives and not so great previous living arrangements to better their lives for generations to come. While the King was invested to conquer and acquire wealth and new territory. This in itself began the very process that started it all. The first colonists gained citizenship because of poor Leadership and a hope for a better life.
Many instances and circumstances and peoples choices went into the correlation of the steps that it took for the colonists to fight for their rights and lives to mean something to have freedom true freedom not just living to fill the pockets of greedy ruler ship. That they themselves could attain what we call the American dream. I believe this is one of the biggest accounts that had to take place was to insight people to want better. Not to settle for less than they deserve. Not to live under the regime of a tyrant but to live under civil liberties that we today get to enjoy and partake in.
The United States went into rebellion in 1775, declared independence as a formal entity in 1776, and ended the Revolutionary War in 1783, which is when it might be said that we became free from...

...Going broke is a very tedious and cumbersome activity, which requires constant vigilance and tireless effort. Although many have accomplished this feat on their own, many of us require some form of guidance. This serves as the quintessential handbook of how to get broke; it shall be called The House of Cards Insolvency Process Guide. To begin, it is critical to limit the term broke as financially bankrupt. Although at times broke can refer to moral emptiness or may even be used to describe both pecuniary and personal ruin, we limit our definition strictly to fiscal failure.
Before we delve into the step by step guidelines on achieving one’s bankruptcy, certain foundations are suggested to be laid out in order to facilitate the process. The presence of these enhancers produces better and faster results 85% of the time. Overindulgent and over-dependent family members are essential in producing fiscal degradation due to their unmatched capacity to raise costs – unnecessary costs in particular. Credit cards are recommended as the payment mode of choice for all transactions down to purchasing a bottle of water. Visa credit cards are advised, due to the many travel-points one can earn from frequent use. You can get a free trip to Anywhere-But-Here as soon as your bank account reaches $ -1.00. Visa also gives you the benefit of choosing what Font and Font Size your Bankruptcy Letter will be...

...breaking awayfrom Great Britain?
America had every right, mind and aspect, to throw off the almost inexorable chains of Great Britain. Not only declaring war against the British was justified, but it was the only choice America had. From the very beginning, (when the colonists first migrated to America) the colonists were displeased with Great Britain's law-makings and government. When diplomatic options and agreements with Great Britain failed, America realized it was time to act and retaliate. The colonists' disagreements with Great Britain's law-makings, the specific unforgettable conflicts/events the colonists had with Great Britain, and the great desire for individuality, and freedom of rights of the colonists ultimately led to the declaration of war, the American Revolution.
One of the reasons that fueled America's rage that ultimately led to the American Revolution and the breaking awayfrom Great Britain was Great Britain's government and law-makings such as the Stamp Act of 1765. This act was passed mainly because Britain had amassed large war debts from wars like the French and Indian War. According to the Stamp Act, "American colonists were required to apply tax stamps to all official documents, including deeds, mortgages, newspapers, and pamphlets." This act was intended to...

...to pay the debt as per mercantilism. The colonists were furious because they believed they had nothing to do with the war and were just dragged in; hence they should not have to help pay the debt. The British military measures and the restriction of civil liberties were really important factors in prompting the Americans to rebel in 1776, although the Parliamentary taxation prompted them to rebel the most.
First, Parliamentary taxation prompted the Americans to rebel the most. The Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, and the Townshend Duties were the primary taxes and duties that ultimately led the colonists to rebel. The Sugar Act of 1764 was a tax designed to eliminate French and Spanish trade by raising duties on molasses. The act was designed with the intent of raising money to pay one-fifth of the military expenses in North America brought on by the French and Indian War. The Sugar Act raised the tax on molasses and sugar from the amount they initially taxed in the Molasses Act of 1733. The tax came to be because Britain not only wanted to make up for the money she had been losing to the Triangular Trade, but also in order to make money for the crown. The significance of the Sugar Act is that it infuriated colonists over the increased tax on imported sweeteners. The Stamp Act of 1765 was a tax on all printed works. It forced Americans to have a stamp affixed to newspapers, all legal documents, and even...