Thursday, February 28, 2008

TAIPEI—On February 25 at the presidential inauguration in Seoul, South Korea, representatives from Taiwan were not allowed to enter the ceremony. On February 26, Mr. Ma Ying-Jeou, the Kuomintang presidential candidate, strongly condemned Beijing's iron fist behind the incident. Ma considered Beijing's attitude extremely rude and unhelpful to its relationship with Taiwan. Regarding to the incident that happened to Wang Jin-pyng, president of the Legislative Yuan, and Mark Chen, National Security Secretary General, Ma expressed his regret. On the other hand, he strongly condemned Beijing, "This is too much!" Ma didn't understand why Beijing had to object and stop a friendly action as such. He commented that Beijing's move was very rude to the people of Taiwan. Ma said that Wang represented the will of people in Taiwan as the president of the legislature and it is extremely inappropriate for Beijing to humiliate him under such a circumstance. Ma also commented, "I don't think South Korea should be subjected to such pressure (from Beijing) either."

Why do the countries of the world so often let Communist China tell them what to do and what to not do?I'm sick and tired of those SinoCommunist bullies! This appeasement must end!

Hosted by Polish Congress Canada, the meeting was attended by such dignitaries as Secretary of State Hon. Jason Kenny, Pavel Vosalik, ambassador of the Czech Republic in Canada and Piotr Konowrocki, consul general of Poland in Toronto. The meeting included an invitation to Kenney to designate land for the monument, which is to be erected in Ottawa, and a call for the creation of an international committee to facilitate the realization of the project. In delivering the opening speech, Kenney singled out a gentleman in the audience from North Korea, "arguably the most brutal regime in the world today." "Your presence here tonight reminds us, when we speak of the victims of communism… we don't speak simply about the victims of before, but more importantly we speak about the victims of the present who live today in prisons, in Gulags, in re-education camps; who suffer from persecution, imprisonment, torture, and still sometimes murder. "We owe it to those people to make this project, this dream, a reality."

Big-business abortion pusher "Planned Parenthood", founded by Margaret Sanger, herself a Nazi, anti-Black racist and a believer in genocide who is on record as desiring to eradicate the Black population, has been caught in what appears to be evidence that its founder's horrendously, murderously evil ideology is shared by the business itself today.

A student-run magazine at UCLA has revealed an undercover investigation in which representatives of Planned Parenthood, the nation's abortion industry leader, admitted willingness to accepting a financial donation targeting the destruction of an unborn black baby.

Ah... also... willingness to conceal the rape of a minor. Oh, the Left will excuse that, as long as those doing the concealing of this terrible crime are "providing women with a 'right to choose'". Being an abortionist is automatic absolution in the eyes of the Far Left, I guess...

Now she's told WND she hopes the taped responses of Planned Parenthood officials in seven states reveal to her local UCLA community and the nation at large the racist leanings of the organization.

"Students on campus are shocked and saddened that such a huge organization would have racist leanings in the present day," she told WND. "They are surprised to hear thetruth about [Planned Parenthood founder] Margaret Sanger, and how the African-American community is being hurt by abortion.

According to Bryan Fisher, executive director of Idaho Values Alliance, Planned Parenthood, which gets an estimated $200 million annually from U.S. taxpayers, has located nearly 80 percent of its clinics nationwide in minority neighborhoods, and about one-third of all abortions are performed on blacks, even though they make up only 13percent of the population.

Is the so-called "Planned Parenthood" racist? Does it have an agenda of reducing what it may consider "inconvenient" minority populations?

Why isn't this getting greater coverage beyond YouTube and the internet? Whither the MSM? Where's the outrage? I mean, this is BIG and horrendous.

Does the Left really care? Or is the Left racist, genocidal, for its dogged support of this sort of thing?

Really, do we willingly fall for the Big Lie that abortion is supposedly about "helping women in need" rather than about two things mainly: Making big money and getting rid of inconvenient minority populations?

This is horrible. Appalling. It must be stopped. Racism must be stopped. The torture-to-death of unborn human beings must be stopped.

We stopped the Holocaust, didn't we? Then we said "Never Again".

Well, it's happening again.

Don't expect Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to care. I seriously doubt that they'd, being Leftwing extremists, care more about their own community than about protecting the abortion industry and abortion itself. But I hope they prove me wrong and take a stand. Don't forget that Leftwing extremists will rationalize anything and everything to ameliorate their blatant hypocrisy. Just watch them betray the Black community by refusing to take on "Planned Parenthood" as a mortal enemy of all Blacks everywhere in America. Don't expect them to try to shut down "Planned Parenthood" and bring the racists to justice.

After all, for the Far Left, the most important ideology of theirs is abortion, which is nothing less than the torture to death of unborn human beings. Abortion is even more sacred to them than stopping racism, I predict we'll witness.

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT "PLANNED PARENTHOOD" AND THOSE WHO SUPPORT THIS GREEDY, RACIST ORGANIZATION

What’s really going on here is that Soharwardy is simply upset at the hostile P.R. he’s received since filing his complaint. All over the world – from CNN to the National Post to a thousand websites, people are calling Soharwardy as they see him: a censor, intolerant of others, using a secular government agency and public money to enforce an Islamic fatwa. I may be getting pummelled in human rights “court”, but Soharwardy is getting pummelled in the court of public opinion.

His column in the Herald was an exercise in damage control, trying to recast himself as a reasonable man who accepts our freedoms. But the very night his column was published, he told CBC’s The National why he really dropped the complaint against me: not because he has some epiphany about freedom, but because “people were looking at Ezra Levant as a martyr of freedom of his speech ... taking this into a different direction that I did not want.” Soharwardy started this human rights circus, but he never thought he’d come across as the clown.

Soharwardy might want to forget about all this, but I don’t. I’ve instructed my lawyers to sue him for the tort of “abuse of process”.

When the complainant in a two-year censorship exercise admits the whole thing was just an ill-considered lark, such a suit is not just about recouping my losses.It’s about holding a little tyrant, and the government agency he hijacked, to account, and having grown-ups -- that is, real judges in real courts -- tell them that what they’ve been doing is morally and legally wrong.

Story here. h/t: NationalNewswatch.comHe could've taken on the role of Al Gore in the Global Warming Scam very easily.He could make Bill Clinton look like a puny amateur when it comes to bullshit.He can't heal anyone.How do I know? Trust me; I know. He didn't heal me; I still can't hear a thing. Thanks for nothing, you big fat fake fraud!The guy's no different from a politician who uses tax dollars for personal enrichment. And like such politicians, he doesn't deliver on his promises. Remember the Liberals? They promised to heal us of the affliction known as "GST". They didn't heal us. Just like Hinn doesn't heal anyone.Hope they shut him down.If he wants to make money by bullshitting guillible, desperate people, then maybe he should've entered the Democratic Presidential Nomination race!And... WTF is up with his hair? Looks like a hat!

WASHINGTON – Despite a congressional mandate banning the sale of commonincandescent light bulbs by 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency iswarning that their compact fluorescent replacements are not safe to useeverywhere.

The EPA says breakage of the energy-saving, mercury-containing CFLs cancause health hazards, especially for children and pregnant women, suggesting useof the bulbs over carpeted areas should be avoided. If bulbs break over carpetedareas, the cleanup may require cutting out pieces of the carpet to avoid toxicexposures.

(...)

For the Maine study, researchers shattered 65 compact fluorescents to testair quality and cleanup methods. They found that, in many cases, immediatelyafter the bulb was broken – and sometimes even after a cleanup was attempted –levels of mercury vapor exceeded federal guidelines for chronic exposure by asmuch as 100 times.

In a new Maine study, mercury vapor released by the bulbs exceeded eventhose higher levels.

(...)

Soon-to-be released results of tests conducted by the state of Maineconfirm earlier states' findings suggesting that under certain conditionsmercury vapor released from broken CFLs can pose a health risk. As a precaution,states such as Vermont are now suggesting removal of carpeting where breakagehas occurred when there are infants and pregnant women present. Other statessuch as Massachusetts are likely to recommend that CFLs not be placed infixtures subject to breakage in areas frequented by sensitive populations.

Problem: Does anyone believe that the average person will be careful? I observe average people every day and find that they aren't, that they're in denial, that they delusionally believe that they're safe, that nothing bad will happen. They, even when they actually areinformed about dangers and necessary precautions, simply don't care and will do whatever's most convenient, putting themselves and others at risk.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.Meteorologist Anthony Watts compiled the results of all the sources. The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C -- a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years. All in one year time. For all sources, it's the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down. Scientists quoted in a past DailyTech article link the cooling to reduced solar activity which they claim is a much larger driver of climate change than man-made greenhouse gases. The dramatic cooling seen in just 12 months time seems to bear that out. While the data doesn't itself disprove that carbon dioxide is acting to warm the planet, it does demonstrate clearly that more powerful factors are now cooling it.

And don't forget that it hasn't been proven that there's any causal relationship between so-called "greenhouse gases" and temperatures across the world. Circumstantial observations are just that: circumstantial, and must be seen as such, rather than used as dogmatic "proof" that certain gases actually somehow cause the planet to warm. Sure, there's theory to explain how it might be, but still it's only theory awaiting conclusive scientific proof. Further, it also hasn't been demonstrated that temperature fluctuations of small amounts are linked to any extreme weather phenomena.Sorry, but the case hasn't been made to scare me about "global warming/climate change". Far as I'm concerned, it's really just another international socialist plot. Such plots are easy enough to carry out as long as the mainstream media plays along, plus a bunch of unethical scientists agree to agree on a policy position allegedly based on "sound science" and reliable data.The question also must be asked: Did the IPCC simply make up the data, or manipulate it somehow in order to fit their worldview and agenda? How can we be certain that they're not pulling a fast one on us?Why must we trust scientists any more readily than we trust politicians, used car salesmen, dictators, judges, lawyers, etc.? Never forget that all people are corruptible, potentially. And some are more easily corrupted than others, particularly when we consider peer pressure, financial pressure, greed and moral and ethical relativism. It's really easy to rationalize lying and doing wrong. So we must question the IPCC. After all, the IPCC is a creature of the evil, immoral, unethical United Nations, which is effectively controlled by nations run by those who do NOT have humanity's, nor the planet's, interests at heart.

If we pay for this guy to have his weewee cut off and get boobies and all that, then there's no predicting what else we'll end up paying for for convicted murderers in prison.

Sorry, but I find it impossible to have any sympathy here. Poor guy will just have to swallow his pride and simply accept himself the way he was born.

If he wanted a sex change operation, then he shouldn't have killed anyone. If he hadn't killed anyone, then he could get a job and save up or borrow money so that he can say bye-bye to Little Bobby and hello to Little Boobies.

Crime must not pay. Not even for sexually-delusional murderers.

There's, for example, people in genuine need of medical attention who aren't getting it any time soon because of a shortage of funds and so on. Why the hell would anyone think that some convicted murderer's desire to trade his willy for a pussy is more important than urgent diagnosis and treatment for, say, cancer?

BRUSSELS—Brussels risks sacrificing European jobs with its plans to cut industrial greenhouse gas emissions, the euro zone's big two economies France and Germany said on Monday. Europe should lead by example but must not "change the competitiveness of our economy and our companies" by adopting tougher pollution measures than in other parts of the world," said Herve Novelli, France's junior minister for industry.

This is the same basic position as Canada has. It makes sense: Why shoot ourselves in the foot with this crap while China under the horrible Communists doesn't have to do the same? It's nothing less than a recipe for the economic destruction of the Free World! With no real guarantee that doing so will prevent any climate change whatsoever!Are you willing to lose your job just because some greedy extremists tell you that doing so will "save the planet"? Not me.Here's an interesting French idea:

France wants the Commission to introduce what would serve as a "carbon tax" against imports from countries that do not agree to cut their greenhouse gas emissions.

Hmm... how about a carbon tax on Chinese imports, then? Surely the Left can sign onto this idea?Let me tell you: The world won't sacrifice the almighty buck at the altar of Climato-Fascist ideological dogma. Not going to happen. Just watch virtually nothing happen but talk, talk, talk. Even Al Gore won't change the way he lives. Nor will David Suzuki.

Story here.Is this the first you heard of it? It's the first I heard of it. Whither the mainstream media? Too excited over a funny yet irrelevant picture of Obama in a turban? Talk about priorities!Emphasis mine.

Keynote speeches from David Kilgour, former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific, and Australian senator Andrew Bartlett marked the commencement of the "International Forum: Human Rights in China and 2008 Olympics" at Taipei's Grand Hyatt Hotel on February 21. Over 100 political figures and human rights activists from 12 countries gathered to deliberate on how to motivate global powers to boycott the Beijing Olympics. (...)Mr. McMillan-Scott's recorded speech stressed that the Chinese communist regime is the most infamous human rights violator in the world today, and the Olympics should not become a propaganda tool to cover up its wrongdoings. McMillan-Scott added that people should not sit by while this regime continues its severe behavior, especially its continued persecution against Falun Gong. McMillan-Scott likened the Beijing Olympics to the 1936 Berlin Olympics. He pointed out that the Beijing regime attempted to gloss over their crimes using the Olympics just like Hitler to disguise the Nazi's massacre of the Jews. He emphasized that people should no longer remain indifferent and allow the recurrence of the history, or tolerate Beijing's manipulation upon the public opinion of the world. David Kilgour talked about the Chinese communist regime's anti-humanity crime of organ harvesting from thousands of live Falun Gong practitioners. Kilgour also touched upon the regime's support in the slaughter of 400,000 of Sudanese in Darfur. He said Beijing's persecution against Falun Gong and other religious groups goes against the Olympic Charter just as the Nazi regime had. "We must bring the Chinese communist regime to obey the Olympic Charter," he remarked. Australian Senator Andrew Bartlett said the world should not evade China's human rights infringement due to the country's economic strength. He urged that, as world citizens, people need to speak out for the victims of human rights violation before the arrival of the Beijing Olympics.

It's sad that, even for the supposedly-against-the-almighty-buck-Left, money is more important than human rights. It's sad also that Leftists prefer comforting lies and omissions to the truth. I guess the Left, while paying lip service thereto, doesn't care as much about human rights in general, so it prefers to simply nurse its two current areas of focus: the promotion of homosexuality and Islam, while people are being slaughtered all over the world, including in China, for simply being different and inconvenient.Not only does the Left have a problem with ignoring human rights abuses worldwide, so does the entire Free World. Not to mention the Islamic World and the Communist World.Why is the world leaving the Chinese Communsits, as well as other evildoers, alone, while they commit atrocity upon atrocity every day against different, inconvenient people?Is the relentless, zealous promotion of homosexuality and Islam really more important than protecting people from being tormented and murdered for no reason other than being different, dissident, inconvenient?

Here's an example of the wit and wisdom of this shining representative of the Religion of PeaceTM:

u think ur funny by posting the message i sent you buddy you live in olds and i aint scared to com ther i hav your fuckn adress ok ill com ther and kick the shit out of you keep on posting this shit i dont give a flying fuck anymore you hav pushed me to far buddy you guys are enjoying talking about me buddy i swer to god you would never say that shit to my face cause your a lil pussy bitch wait till i com see you in olds with 50 lebs

"Lebs"? That slang for lesbians? Whatever.and another...

sereousle u hav noooo fuckn clue what you got your self into get anybody u want no one is gonna stop me from kickn the fuck out of you tell the whole world i dont give a fuck if i go to jail or not any more you pushed me around too far n im fed up with this bs and this talking u guys are doin about me like i said google up the last name jeha and tell me wat u get buddy wat ur in olds thats wat 45 min away from me i dont care ill drive downther just to prove to u that i aint all talk like you fucks and if your a man you will unblok me so i can leave comments o i odnt care anyways do wat u want but wen u c me pulln up to your house buddy you better b running cause wen i get a hold of you im gonan kick the fuck out of you

Sounds like a member of the KKK or a Skinhead, doesn't it?Of course. How dare anyone expose a Muslim for spreading hatred and contempt against a Jewish person? You tell truth about me? How dare you? A lowly Kaffir dares diss a superior Muslim? Unacceptable! I wage jihad against you, Infidel!!!! How dare you say "Hey, don't do that; that's wrong!" When I attack Jews!This anti-Semitism sounds a whole lot familiar. Imagine the vile filth a KKKer would spew against a Black person for exposing the KKKer as a hater. Imagine a Nazi's response to a Jew who exposed his hatefulness... Same thing here. This is a hater, hater, hater... Are you listening, Richard Warman and Warren Kinsella? Go get the hater, boys! Haul 'er before the Human Rights Commission! Deny her a fair trial just like you denied all those other folks! Take her money away and keep some of it for yourself as a reward for your self-perceived righteousness in crushing haters wherever they are, taking away their rights in the process... Get 'er, boys! Hate must be eradicated no matter what the cost, right? What are you waiting for? Hate is hate, right? Right? Or does it depend on who's doing the hating? Ok for some to hate but not for others?Not to mention the promises of violence... this is also a criminal matter.How nice, eh? Such hatred being spewed. Such violence being promised. Oh, yes, and such atrocious command of the English language. What an articulate, well-educated, well-adjusted, tolerant individual.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Diane Gramley, a pro-family activist in Pennsylvania, says it's hard to comprehend why a public school principal is being criticized for wearing a Boy Scout uniform during a television segment.Gramley is president of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania, and she is talking about the fact that homosexual activists in the Keystone State are blasting apublic school principal simply because he is a Boy Scout leader. Robert Wheeler,principal at Cleveland Elementary School in Allentown, recently appeared on thePBS show Tempo, dressed in his Scout uniform.Wheeler was featured on the program, which concentrated on the good works done by the Boy Scouts of America. In addition, other Scouts who attend the school were shown wearing their Scout uniforms. But the president of an organization that claims the Scouts practice discrimination by prohibiting homosexuals to be leaders said the school should not support the Scouts and should never have allowed them inside the building in their uniforms.Gramley says the demands are absurd and outrageous. "This is a [kindergarten] through fourth-grade school, so we're talking about little kids," she explains. "And some of these activists don't even want the little boys to be permitted to wear their scout uniforms to school on the day that they meet after school, in the school building. It's hard for me to comprehend."

The homosexual fascists who would be so assinine to condemn the Boy Scouts are hypocritical. They aren't saying, "The school should not support the Muslims and should never have allowed them inside the building in their uniforms". May I remind everyone that Islam is murderously intolerant of homosexuals and never allows them to become imams and other Islamic leaders, at least knowingly?The Boy Scouts are good. They don't have to be forced to endorse ideologies in which they strongly disbelieve as a matter of values stemming from Christianity, which is protected under the constitution. They cannot be required to make openly "gay" individuals leaders in their organizations if it's against their values. If they can, however, be forced to do so despite their constitution's guarantee of freedom of religion, etc., then Muslims can and must also be forced to make homosexuals imams and other kinds of leaders. But as long as the homosexual fascists leave the Muslims alone, I say, leave the Boy Scouts alone, you cowardly bullies!Geez... if the homosexuals want to form their own scouting organization, let them. Then they can lead as much as they want within their organizations.Besides, do you think the homosexuals would be tolerant of people inside their organization who were openly non-condoning of homosexuality? Do you think they'd make non-condoning-of-homosexuality people leaders in a homosexual scouting organization? Sure they would, and so would the Muslims make homosexuals imams!You know, this is another example of homosexual extremists persecuting Christians. After all, the Boy Scouts uses Christian values and belief in God as fundamental values. Therefore the homosexual militants are being intolerant, Christianophobic, hateful... isn't that nice?For heaven's sake! If "gays" don't want to join the Scouts, they don't have to! No one's forcing them to! What's happening here is clearly that the homosexual fascists want to tell the Scouts what they have to be and not be. This is unconstitutional.After all, nowhere in the American constitution does it say anything about homosexuality or even sexual preference.For this to change, then the Constitution would have to be changed according to the specific processes prescribed therein. Why not respect the Constitution? Oh, that's right; extremists find it inconvenient, therefore they ignore it or lie about what it supposedly says or doesn't say.

The war continues, with Liberal Fascist Richard Warman lobbing a threat of legal action against freedom fighter Ezra Levant...

Warman and his friends at the CHRC aren’t hitting me with a human rights complaint – not yet, anyways. But he is threatening me with the most bizarre defamation lawsuit I think I’ve ever encountered.

(...)

As a defamation lawyer, I know that Warman’s complaints are baseless. So, other than the nuisance and cost of defending the suit – the “maximum disruption” that Warman promises – there’s nothing to fear. For me, at least.

But what about for Warman? Until now, he could beaver away on his human rights complaints while I railed harmlessly in the media. I had no impact on him, other than on his ego. But now he’s changed that. He’s decided to lock himself into a formal legal process with me, in a real court, with real rules – not the loosey-goosey kangaroo court where he used to work.

Before, he could ignore me; now he has to answer my questions about his conduct under oath; now he has to disclose documents touching on the many matters at hand – everything from e-mails to files on his hard drive. “No comment” and “that’s confidential” don’t work in an examination for discovery.

Of course, Warman, like radical Imam Soharwardy, may well pussy out and withdraw his complaints, or, perhaps, just like comrade Kinsella, not even bother to pursue his threatened action at all.

If it goes ahead, well, Ezra's not alone. We're behind him all the way!

JERUSALEM – The board of a nonprofit organization on which Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.

The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group.

With ties like this, how on earth can someone be acceptable to Americans? Of course, at this point, he appears to be acceptable just to Democrats...

With ties like this, at least the Republican opponent will have ammunition to use against this unknown individual without any declared intentions.

What is Obama's agenda?

We don't know. He isn't saying. He just keeps chanting, "Change, change, change".

Doesn't surprise me one bit.Story here. Read it all for full information.

An undercover survey of more than 100 mosques and Islamic schools in America has exposed widespread radicalism, including the alarming finding that 3 in 4 Islamic centers are hotbeds of anti-Western extremism, WND has learned.The Mapping Sharia in America Project, sponsored by the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, has trained former counterintelligence and counterterrorism agents from the FBI, CIA and U.S. military, who are skilled in Arabic and Urdu, to conduct undercover reconnaissance at some 2,300 mosques and Islamic centers and schools across the country."So far of 100 mapped, 75 should be on a watchlist," an official familiar with the project said.

Many aren't homegrown. They're actually foreign-controlled:

Many of the Islamic centers are operating under the auspices of the Saudi Arabian government and U.S. front groups for the radical Muslim Brotherhood based in Egypt.

Those mosques which are foreign-controlled are apparently trojan horses. Apparently the Saudis and other Islamic supremacist-imperialists use money from our buying their oil to set up mosques in our Free World countries to indoctrinate/brainwash Muslims to hate people who aren't Muslim, to be intolerant, supremacistic and to prepare to take over non-Muslim countries eventually.It's part of the whole worldwide Islamization movement of radical Islam.The bigoted, prejudiced, myopic and hateful Far Left is looking for imaginary boogeymen in Judaism/Israel, in Christianity and in "white" people, all of whom they delusionally, wrongly suspect of "conspiring to impose their views/race on all". I contend that this is a result of enemy propaganda and infiltration, particularly from the KGB of Russia, and it's been decades in the making. Proof? Here's the proof!Not only that, the communist enemy has facilitated the Islamist trojan horse against us.

Though not all mosques in America are radicalized, many have tended to serve as safe havens and meeting points for Islamic terrorist groups. Experts say there are at least 40 episodes of extremists and terrorists being connected to mosques in the past decade alone.

Again, read it all.There's more shocking detail as to what was discovered undercover.Of course, the Left and radical Muslim propagandists will denounce these findings. It's automatic.The threat is grave and real. The enemy, radical Islam, is patient, methodical, systematic. Their goal transcends their mortal lives, meaning that they'll pass the baton to future generations to continue with the Islamization movement if need be.After all, we've been under attack from imperialist Islam for many centuries...Note to Leftist bloggers (with special emphasis on one in particular, one whose initials, based on either his real name or a phony name, are "D.B.", who knows very well that I'm referring to him) and others hellbent on discrediting those of us who dare to post truth (which they propagandically label "hatred") and analysis: I've decided to ignore you. I will not bother to lurk about your blogs any longer to see what nonsense you say about what I post. After all, you're single-mindedly hellbent on silencing all who dare to differ from you, no matter how much proof they provide that they're right.

Story here.Imagine that. Young men. Trying to meet girls. On Valentine's Day. In Saudi Arabia. I didn't make this up.Incredible. Not only is homosexuality an offence requiring the death penalty, but you can get arrested for just being heterosexual, too!WTF, is it that in Islam EVERYTHING is illegal? Seems that way!Oh, and they also banned Valentine's Day, also banning the sale of roses. Holy shiite! Roses illegal on Valentine's Day!

They were accused of wearing "indecent clothing and playing loud music and dancing" to attract the attention of the opposite sex

Members of the commission, known as the Muttawa, patrol public areas to ensure the kingdom's brand of ultra-conservative Islam is enforced, and this includes strict segregation of the sexes.

Segregation! Hear that, Left? Time to get outraged! Take to the streets and burn Saudi and Islamic flags and all that crap! Burning the American and Israeli flags is illogical to the max and actually encourages the Islamofascists to become even more intolerant and brutal all the time by letting them off the hook. Indeed, that's "progressive". That's what "progressives" want. I don't understand why the Left prefers to condemn America, Israel, Judeochristianity, etc. but not Islam, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. Let alone China and communism. How can "progressives" justify this inconvenient truth about themselves? Oh, I see. They don't have to justify as long as they deny, deny, deny... and call us "racists" for daring to speak the inconvenient truth!There's a big undertone of intolerant hatred directed towards Christianity also, judging what the Kingdom's Grand Mufti said while connecting Valentine's Day to Christianity, also calling Christianity "pagan".You know, why doesn't the Left, instead of pushing the Climate Change Scam, force our governments to take concrete measures, including setting legally binding deadlines, for ending all purchases of Saudi and other Islamofascist-nation-produced oil? Hey, Al Gore, do a movie! Hey, UN! Commission an International Panel on Islamic Oil to reach a "consensus" that we have to stop buying Islamic oil or else face catastrophe!F'n Saudi Islamofascists!

23 February 2008: Dallas, Texas police officer Donald Strong* could not believe what he was hearing – an order issued by the United States Secret Service to “stand down” at a Wednesday rally at the Reunion Arena where Democratic presidential candidate Barak Obama was to address a crowd of nearly 20,000 people. “About 90 minutes before the start of the event, an order was issued to stop the most basic protective security procedures. We had the manpower - it didn’t make sense,” stated the officer.

(...)

“I felt that there was something wrong with the order [to stand down] but I was told not concern myself, that it was being handled. But it was not being handled. When I continued to voice my concern, I was told to ‘stay out of it,’” stated the officer, who added that he fears going public with the information could jeopardize his job. Although the rally went forth as planned without incident, Officer Strong believes that there is something else – something more nefarious going on. “The manpower was there – it was not an issue. Why would we be told to stand down? It made no sense. There needs to be an investigation [of this incident] and the individual who ultimately issued the order needs to be identified. I’ve been a cop too long not to know that there is something bigger going on here.”

Don't ask me what I make of all this. You'll have to make your own analysis! Also of interest: Not-seen-before-by-myself, graphic footage of assassination indicating JFK was shot twice, once in chest/shoulder or back area, then in frontal right side of head. I don't know whether this has been on TV, as I never saw it, but it's the most graphic, clear and full-color footage I ever saw. Warning: graphic, shocking. Watch at your own risk.

To put this in perspective, with advance apologies to any offended ethnic groups: How would Americans react if Latino gangs started ambushing police and killing government officials in California, and after a few years the U.S. sent in the troops because the gangs were outgunning the police force; following this, the gangsters started claiming atrocities—and so Russia and China bombed California and Washington in response to the “atrocities”; the foreign powers then occupied California for eight years while the gangs killed or expelled most of the non-Latinos in “revenge attacks,” then backed a declaration of independence for California as a Mexican-majority state that may just unify with Mexico?The current state of affairs is a product of a concerted, single-minded, bipartisan American effort to turn Serbs into an enemy as the U.S. tries to make friends of its enemies in the region, always at Serbian expense. “Will Russia now become the leader of the Europeans who resist the Islamization of their continent?” Thomas Landen asks in the Brussels Journal. He notes that Moscow has called on the UN to annul independence, and a UN vote may be the only thing to save us from a new world war over this Balkan province, ignored by the media and public for eight years as insignificant, despite the Balkans’ history for setting off world wars.“Indeed,” continues Landen, “what will Russia do if the 16,000 NATO ‘peacekeeping’ troops in Kosovo attack the Serbian army when it attempts to recover its breakaway province? If Russia intervenes, then 2008 might become the year that war broke out between Russia and NATO. America, the EU, Europe’s immigrant ‘youths,’ and Osama bin Laden would find themselves on one side, fighting Russia, China, and those Europeans who resist Islamization on the other."Who could have envisioned such a sorry state of affairs on September 12, 2001? The answer is: anyone who noticed that our Balkan policies didn’t change following 9/11. We are now several years post-9/11, yet our government is creating Muslim states in Europe and is about to engage the United States military against European Orthodox Christians who don’t want to live under Muslim rule.(...)This week merrymakers in Pristina waving Albanian and American flags shouted “KLA! KLA!” – the supposedly disbanded, heroin-financed “rebels” who trained in terrorist camps. “What is the point of fighting Islamism in Iraq,” asks the Brussels Journal’s Landen, “while at the same time one creates a free haven for Islamists on the European continent?” He adds, “The Jerusalem Post reported in 1998 that the [KLA] was provided with financial and military support from Islamic countries,’ and had been ‘bolstered by hundreds of Iranian fighters or mujahedin [some of whom] were trained in Osama bin Laden’s terrorist camps in Afghanistan.’”

The study found that cat owners may be less likely to diefrom heart attack, stroke or other types of cardiovascular disease.

(...)

They found that, over a 20-year period, those participants who had never owned a cat had a 40 per cent greater risk of death due to heart attack and a 30 per cent higher risk of death to due to any sort of cardiovascular disease than current cat owners or those who had previously owned a cat.

(...)

The researchers conclude that "cats as pets may represent a novel strategy for reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases in high-risk individuals."

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Once again, geopolitics trumps PR. The bad news is that the Communists remain deadly serious about their geopolitical aims. The good news is that the Olympics won't be nearly as beneficial to them as we initially feared.

Because of polling numberswhich suddenly don't look as good for the Librano$$$ as they did a little while ago.Funny how the Liberals are gung-ho when the polls favor them, but as soon as the polls go against them, they suddenly drop a load, put their tails between thier legs and scurry away sheepishly...This particular poll also shatters the hard-to-believe spin the MSM has been giving us for quite awhile now.Read it for yourself. And understand why the Liberals will either vote for the government's legislation, sit on their hands or scurry en masse out of the House. Because they don't want to face an electorate that doesn't want to vote for them.Canadians are saying that Conservative's the way to go.And they really aren't worried about the environment or the economy anywhere near as much as the MSM has been claiming they are.

More young Canadians are using guns in assaults, robberies and homicides, even as Canada's overall rate of violent crime involving firearms remained stable in 2006, Statistics Canada reports.The rate of young people aged 12 to 17 accused of a firearm-related offence rose 32 per cent between 2002 and 2006, driven primarily by robberies, the Statscan study said. In 2006, 1,287 youths were accused of a violent offence involving a gun.Canadian police services reported just over 8,100 victims of violent gun crime, accounting for 2.4 per cent of all victims of violence. Other types of weapons were used more often: Knives accounted for 6.2 per cent of violent victimizations; clubs and other blunt instruments were used against 3 per cent of victims, the report said.Ron Melchers, a professor of criminology at University of Ottawa, said the spike in youth gun crime is a result of people getting involved in serious criminal activity at a younger and younger age, primarily in Canada's large urban areas.

Behold the legacy of "progressivism" and "liberalism".You know, the Left argues that crime "isn't getting worse", that there's "not more" crime.Well, I say to the Left, one victim is too many.Our agenda must become to aim to create a crime-free Canada. Sure, no crime at all is impossible, but the value behind the anti-crime stance of Canadian society must be made clear and unmistakable. Being against crime and imposing tough consequences upon lawbreakers, particularly violent ones, must become one of our key values... and frequently be spoken of as such.Liberalism/socialism/secular humanism doesn't do a bloody thing to reduce crime. Therefore let's do what we know works, even if it means actually taking even kids, by force, off the streets to prevent them from going around shooting people anymore. What's preferable, taking a child into secure custody, preventing him/her from going out at all without official escort, all the while reeducating, reindoctrinating the child in proper attitude and social behavior... or simplistically saying, "Don't do that again. Here's some hugs. Here's some very, very quick, one-size-fits-all, socialist-prescribed 'rehabilitation'. Now get out of here." and then hearing that they've gone and shot and killed an innocent with a Desert Eagle they bought off of some terrorist sleeper cell member or some Hells Angels member on the street?As for releasing them to their parents, well, not all parents are law-abiding, not all have values, not all care worth a shit about their kids or about other people, so, in such cases of irresponsible parents, the kids oughtn't be released back to them, for that'd do no good, unless, however, we force the parents to learn to become responsible and then actually prove they're responsible or else lose their kids.The Left has its own "ideas" of how to deal with crime, including youth crime. But they've had decade after decade after decade to demonstrate that their way of doing things actually works. And it doesn't. We know this. For example, Rudy Giuliani proved that cracking down and taking criminals off the streets reduces crime, something his Leftist mayoral predecessors never did.Canadians have, after all, a Charter right to safety and security of the person. For the state apparatus to allow violent thugs and scumbags to roam the streets with banned weapons is to violate this right. If the state apparatus isn't going to crack down on the bad people with the guns, then at least restore the Charter right of the law-abiding by allowing them to become licenced to carry handguns for self-defence and defence of others against crazed, off-meds gunmen who walk into public places and shoot everyone in sight.

The wonderfully tolerant world of Islamonce again demonstrates why it's so popular with the Far Left.And Saudi Arabia demonstrates that it's a shining example of progressivism in human rights and all that stuff.Imagine that. A woman. Goes to Starbucks. And has a coffee. And sits at a table with a man. A man. A woman. Alone. Drinking coffee. With a man. In Saudi Arabia. We didn't make this up. Choose your Saudi Arabia.Next thing we know, they'll imprison and torture foreigners on deliberately false charges... oh, wait! They already have!And chop off those dirty, un-Islamic fags' heads... as Allah forbids faggotry! If Allah is against it, gotta persecute people for doing it... Inshallah!But...Nothing to see here, says the Far Left. Further, the Far Left says, "How dare you! Spreading hate against the peaceful, tolerant, progressive people of Islam! What did they ever do to anyone who's different? Racist! Bigot!"Defending fundamentalist, literalist Islam and intolerant, hateful, harmful fundamentalist, literalist Muslims, as the Far Left does all the time, is no different than defending white supremacists. Except that the Islamists are a far, far greater threat today to humanity than are the white supremacists, who've been so effectively marginalized and persecuted with extreme prejudice as to be a very minuscule threat in comparison.Why not marginalize radical Islamists, rather than submit to them and take the Peoples' tax dollars to build public footbaths for them and so on? It worked to marginalize and persecute the white supremacists... it'll work for Islamic supremacists. The only difference between the two kinds of supremacists is that one side happens to believe in the Koran and takes it literally.It's time to hunt Islamic supremacists and bring them to justice with exactly as much zeal as we've used and continue to use against white supremacists.Whither Richard Warman, then? Warren Kinsella? What, are their heads firmly stuck upside each others' ani?And just check out the attitude of the following Islamic fascist/apologist for Islamic fascism in the comments there:

It's their way of life. Women don't seem to be oppressed, the public don't seem to want to rebel ( unlike for example, IRAN) . They see it logical that women arent shÃ¢gging and flirting with random blokes- let the country live life how they want. If the public want it bad enough, then it's okay for the west to help and fuel the fire, but lets not take the micky cos they are so different to uschetas patel, croydon, surrey

Obviously one of those many Islamic fascists living in Britain. Likely grew up there, judging from the accent. Women not oppressed? Oh, really? "Let the country live life how they want"? You mean be intolerant, torturous, murderous, xenophobic? Yep. That's good stuff. Nice, tolerant, progressive, non-hateful guy, eh? And naturally the Leftists will agree with him: "Muslims 'have the right' to do whatever they want however they see fit to whomever they want, as Allah wills it... and don't you dare tell me they're intolerant, you dirty hater, or I'll file a complaint against you with the Human Rights Commission!"

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Dazed, confused and clueless: Liberal "leader" Stephane Dion thinks that the economy is in bad shape, believing the unsupported media sensationalism and accuses the Harper Conservative government of dropping the economic ball, without backing up his accusation.

The Liberals are scrambling to do damage control to try to distract us from the Harper Conservatives' recently reminding us that the Liberals have made so many billions of dollars worth of promises that it'd be impossible to keep them without plunging Canada deeply into deficit and running up the debt again.So they make unfounded accusations of the government somehow doing nothing to keep the economy on solid footing, doing nothing to prepare us for possible recessionary pressures. Really, do they expect the reasonable person to just take their word for it without any specific reasons offered as to why to believe them?I'd also remind Canadians that we don't believe in corporate welfare, but we see the Liberals and other Leftist parties demanding welfare handouts to industry! Now, we know that this isn't the way to go, certainly not in the long run. Corporate welfare does nothing to make the Canadian business environment more competitive, nothing to make this an attractive country in which to do business, nothing to spur productivity, nothing to reduce the taxation and red tape burden on business. At least the Harper Conservatives have actually been working on this file, and have already put into place phased reductions in corporate tax rates.The Liberals have nothing to offer. Nothing to say to convince Canadian voters that they'd be better than, or even anywhere near as good as, the Harper Conservatives have been, and the Harper Conservatives have been great, not that one would be reminded of precisely how by the mainstream media, which appears to not want to give the Conservatives rightful positive coverage, in terms of, for example, ensuring national unity, keeping the economy strong and making it stronger, keeping their promises, cutting taxes, undertaking to rebuild the military and restoring Canada's standing in the world by being a real leader in foreign affairs.We've got a great thing going with the Harper Conservatives. Why on earth would we vote to end that in favor of something we know full well will only screw everything up all over again? Come on; if you were unsure until now, give your head a shake and face reality: The Harper Conservatives are really, really good, and deserve our vote to stay the course, to keep up the good work to keep Canada becoming ever-greater. Remember, the best is yet to come!

18 February 2008 It was around midnight on Tuesday, February 5, 2008 when a series of at least three explosions ripped through Jacob’s Lube & Citgo gas station, convenience store and deli at the corner of Busch and North Boulevards in Tampa, killing 22 year-old Palestinian immigrant Farid I.A. KARAKRA. The station was closed for business at that hour, raising questions about what KARAKRA was doing at hisbrother-in-law's automotive repair shop in the middle of the night.According to law enforcement sources and published reports, KARAKRA, a/k/a Farid YUSIF, went to the station after visiting with some friends at the Al-Aqsa Coffee House, a Middle Eastern coffee shop and popular hangout for Muslims, especially Muslim students who attend the University of South Florida. Investigation indicates that KARKRA left the coffee shop around 11:30 p.m. Tuesday, traveling from 10819 56th Street to Citgo at 901 W. Busch Boulevard in Tampa. Within the hour, he would be dead from the burns he suffered in the explosions and subsequent fire. According to residents living near the gas station, the explosions were so large that the concussions shook houses in the area. Valiant attempts to rescue the screaming KARAKRA were made by Alonzo Browne, an employee of a donut shop located across from the station, and by Tampa Police Tampa Officers Ed Croissant and Cpl. Jim Thompson who arrived shortly after the explosions. The heat from the fire following the explosions was so intense, KARAKRA could not be saved. He was ultimately removed from inside the gas station by Tampa Fire personnel, but KARAKRA had already expired. (...)Publicly, law enforcement officials have yet to comment on the cause of the explosions. Rumors that forensic examiners investigating the blast site found traces of a certain compounds “not indigenous to” or normally found at automotive service stations have not been publicly confirmed. Nonetheless, this law enforcement source confided to thisinvestigator that trace evidence collected from the scene has been analyzed “bythe feds.” While the results of those tests have not been released, this sourceis reporting that trace evidence tested positive for the presence of an explosive material, but declined to identify the material to avoid potentially compromising the ongoing investigation.(...)As suggested by the law enforcement source speaking to this investigator, don’t expect much information to be made public by federal authorities working on this case. As with most such cases, news about this case will eventually be absorbed into the fabric of an impotent media combined with public malaise about potential terrorism activities inside the U.S.

It could be a truly bizarre coincidence, but we can't afford to dismiss these similar-circumstance explosions of recent days as such.It appears that it's possible that huge explosions are being deliberately set off at times during which there'd be little or no innocent casualties. It's possible to hypothesize that these are some sort of tests, with few or no innocent casualties taken so as to minimize also the attention and news coverage of the incidents...Again, also, we witness the continuing pattern of the authorities declining to provide us with information on what was found. And the mainstream media's utter lack of interest in pursuing the incident in the name of informing the public.(Oh, and a special message for certain Far-Leftist bloggers obsessed with gigglingly ridiculing me and my postings, may I remind you guys that you are supportive of the likes of Richard Warman, who poses as a racist online in order to entrap people and haul them before the "Human Rights" Commission, taking away their rights and profiting off of them in the process... and Warren Kinsella, who hunts imaginary Nazis/white supremacists in boys' bathroom stalls, posts a hoaxical photograph of a supposed Holocaust-survivor numerical ID "tattoo" and brags about it all on his blog? Why support those guys in their delusional obsession with imaginary scary extremists while ridiculing my actual-fact-based postings, with my reasonable hypotheses, analysis and pattern-recognition-reminders between incidents? Who's the obsessed? Who's the delusional? I'd suggest it's you!)