RELEVANCE: Does the paper address issues related to aspects of human-level intelligence, complex cognition, or similar topics related to cognitive systems?

3 Related to highly related - a factor in accepting the paper2 Marginally related - a factor in rejecting the paper1 Not related - sufficient basis for rejecting the paper

NOVELTY: Is this work novel? Do the authors present a problem or approach that extends or clarifies the capabilities of cognitive systems, or increase our understanding of their operation, in substantial ways?

4 Very novel - a strong factor in accepting the paper3 Somewhat novel - a factor in accepting the paper2 Marginally novel - a factor in rejecting the paper1 Not novel - a sufficient basis to reject the paper

CLAIMS: Does the paper make clear claims about its contribution to cognitive systems? Such claims can take many forms, but they should be stated unambiguously in accessible language.

3 Clear claims - a factor in accepting the paper2 Vague claims - a factor in rejecting the paper1 No claims - a sufficient basis to reject the paper

EVIDENCE: Do the authors present convincing evidence that supports their claims? Such evidence can take different forms, but it should lead a reasonable person to conclude the claims are correct.

4 Very convincing - a strong factor in accepting the paper3 Somewhat convincing - a factor in accepting the paper2 Not convincing - a factor in rejecting the paper1 No evidence - a sufficient basis to reject the paper

CLARITY: Does the paper's writing and organization present its ideas to readers effectively? Can moderately informed readers understand the main contributions?">

4 Very effective - a strong factor in accepting the paper3 Somewhat effective - a factor in accepting the paper2 Not ineffective - a factor in rejecting the paper1 Not effective - a sufficient basis to reject the paper

Publication in the journal Advances in Cognitive Systems

If this paper is accepted for oral presentation at the conference, do you think it should
also be invited for publication in the online journal, Advances in Cognitive Systems?

Invite paper for the journalDo not invite

Review

Please provide a detailed review, including justification for your
scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless the program committee chairs
decide not to do so.

Confidential remarks for the program committee

If you wish to add any remarks intended only for program committee members, please
write them below. These remarks will only be seen by the program committee members
having access to reviews for this submission. They will not be sent to
the authors.

If the review was written by (or with the help from) a subreviewer,
add information about the subreviewer (first name, last name and email) below.