Hi, I would like to suggest the addition of defining a 'hot' folder / directory in OpenDocman. The idea should be that this particular folder is checked when an admin user is logging in and that the adminuser can be taken to a screen where it can process each file in that hot folder after which the concerning file is moved to the main storage. This way users can create their own ways for automating file additions from different places to this hot folder.

I myself created a webdav connection from my server to a cloudprovider and have a cronjob running every 5 kins which copies files from that provider to my local disk (and this location would then become my 'hot' folder). I also saw the request for ftp access to Opendocman. With my suggestion this would be easily done as well.

Hi, I would like to suggest the addition of defining a 'hot' folder / directory in OpenDocman. The idea should be that this particular folder is checked when an admin user is logging in and that the adminuser can be taken to a screen where it can process each file in that hot folder after which the concerning file is moved to the main storage. This way users can create their own ways for automating file additions from different places to this hot folder.

I myself created a webdav connection from my server to a cloudprovider and have a cronjob…

If a user without 'reviewer' access, edits a document; they cannot make any more changes until it has been reviewed.
If the department's 'reviewer' is out of the office, the document is unavailable to everyone.
One also can't give everyone in the department 'reviewer' access, or they can see all of the department's documents.
There are 3 issues:
- A 'non-reviewed checked-in' document is unavailable for viewing by everyone; including the last approved revision.
- A 'reviewer' can see all department documents, regardless of their file permissions. They should only be able to review documents where they are the 'owner' or have 'view' access
- A document can't be 're-checked-out' before an approval by the department 'reviewer'.

If a user without 'reviewer' access, edits a document; they cannot make any more changes until it has been reviewed.
If the department's 'reviewer' is out of the office, the document is unavailable to everyone.
One also can't give everyone in the department 'reviewer' access, or they can see all of the department's documents.
There are 3 issues:
- A 'non-reviewed checked-in' document is unavailable for viewing by everyone; including the last approved revision.
- A 'reviewer' can see all department documents, regardless of their file permissions. They should only be able to review documents where they are the 'owner'…

Physical copies of digital documents need some way to be secured. I suggest a QR code to be generated for a particular version of a document, and printed somewhere on the physical copy. The QR code should contain an obfuscated link to the digital copy, which allows a person to verify that the physical copy has not been tampered with. (Other than the addition of the QR code.)