I have another post [1] where I ask why whitelisting a site would cause other traffic to be blocked, but maybe the real question is whether or not this particular feature supports whitelisting IPs.
This is the feature I tried to implement to solve my whitelisting needs:
Content Filter Configuration on RV320 and RV325 VPN Router Series
[1]: https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-routers/why-does-content-filter-gt-allowed-domains-on-rv32x-block-sites/m-p/3702360
[2]: https://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=4231
... View more

Needed to Whitelist a Cloud App's Server IP addresses on our office network connected to Cisco RV325 Gigabit Dual WAN VPN Router. This network has been running without incident for over a year and was configured by someone else.
We needed to whitelist these IPs and the FAQ for this unit says [1],
12. [...] Content filtering can blacklist and whitelist access to websites according to keywords and Uniform Resource Locators (URLs).
Sounded like what we need. Followed the instructions for Whitelisting found here, Content Filter Configuration on RV320 and RV325 VPN Router Series [2]
Firewall > Content Filter
Accept allowed domans (enabled)
Added the IPs
Now, after only adding the IPs, various web pages are unreachable and display this message:
"This URLs or Page has been blocked"
There are no blocked sites. Only added the positive rule.
What did adding IP addresses to Accept allowed domans trigger to cause other sites to also be blocked??
EDIT: Fix title; add screenshot
[1]: https://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=aac7ec4e34624230b200b36d8461c77f_h_5364.xml&pid=2&respid=0&snid=3&dispid=0&cpage=search
[2]: https://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=4231
... View more

Please describe what is necessary for me to convert the running-config of my Dino 871W from the entry router to a bridge router? The current running-config was used when the router was directly connected to a Cable Modem.
Now, I'm using the Cable Co.s Wifi Router, but I'd like to cascade one of the ethernet ports to the 871W for wired connection to a few new sandbox servers. I need these servers to serve the LAN only (not the WWW).
The layout is,
WWW -->
Cable Modem -->
Router 1 (DLink from Comcast) wireless and ethernet -->
Router 2 (Cisco 871W) ethernet traffic.
From what I gather, I need to
- set the addresses to the same subnet (192.168.1.255)
- modify the 871 running-config (maybe the FastEthenet4 section?) to 'bridge'
- Port forward from DLink to 871
How am I doing?
... View more

Helo, I'm still really interested in solving this problem. Anyone able to help? PS> Sorry about the "correct answer" thing, I accidentally clicked this and then tried to click it off. This ended up giving me three incorrect "correct answers"!
... View more

This is frustrating. I can find detailed instructions for something like the 806 router [1], but this doesn't workout on the 831 router. Previously, when I've asked for assistance on this unit (before I bought an 871W and gave up for my personal use) one thing was people were giving me commands which didn't apply to this unit--no wonder I got it for $15 on ebay ! But this darn thing worked once.
drizzledrazzle#show ip int brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Ethernet0 10.10.10.1 YES NVRAM up up
Ethernet1 10.0.20.105 YES DHCP up up
[1]: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/broadband-cable/cable-modems/19268-router-behind-cm-19268.html
... View more

Here's another example config from a tutorial site for an 806 behind another router. [1] This is similar to my configuration.
Does it matter that my internal ip is 10.0.0.0 and the external ip from the current network is 10.0.0.0 as well? Should I change this to 192.168.0.0 or 10.10.10.0? Is this a possible conflict?
Fact is the router is getting DHCP from the external network and my internal NAT is assigning IPs, but they're just not connecting.
From the 806 example, there is this line:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 66.108.112.1
!--- IP address 66.108.112.1 is the next hop IP address, also called
!--- the default gateway. Your Internet service provider (ISP) can tell you what IP address to
!--- configure as the next hop address.
I've replaced with this, simply because the external, which I receive at Ethernet1 is dhcp, and I don't know what it's going to be.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet1
What am I missing here?
1: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/broadband-cable/cable-modems/19268-router-behind-cm-19268.html
... View more

I changed #2 to no effect. Here's the output for #1,
#sh ip ro
Default gateway is not set
Host Gateway Last Use Total Uses Interface
ICMP redirect cache is empty
Looking how to solve this...
... View more

This blog post suggests there's some problem with DHCP logging. I followed the link and its describing some kind of applet installation. All over my head. http://blog.ipspace.net/2009/10/dhcp-client-address-change-detector.html This cisco page describes turning on logging here. Is this what you recommended? Is this the minimum which won't log too much (all I want is the DHCP)? https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/24661/how-configure-logging-cisco-ios#Configuration_Overview:
... View more