ACLU Files 13 Lawsuits For Records Related To Trump's Travel Ban

An ACLU representative speaks with Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., during a protest at Dulles International Airport in Virginia on Jan. 29, 2017. The ACLU is suing for documents related to implementation of the president's travel ban.

Bill Clark
/ CQ-Roll Call, Inc.

The American Civil Liberties Union announced on Wednesday that its affiliates had filed 13 coordinated Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, demanding government documents related to implementation of the president's executive orders on travel and immigration.

The organization seeks records from local offices of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Department of Homeland Security — records the ACLU says it first requested on Feb. 2. The ACLU says "the government has failed to substantively respond."

The lawsuits seek information from 13 local CBP offices – primarily in cities with international airports "where there were reports of some kind that we wanted to get information about, and we wanted to get it from the people handling it on the ground," says Gabriela Melendez, political communications manager for the ACLU.

The ACLU says the agency has a long history of not complying with FOIA rules.

The civil liberties group sent a letter to then-CBP Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske in July 2016, complaining that often "FOIA requesters receive no response whatsoever. Those who do receive a response are frequently told (erroneously) that no records exist, or they are provided with incomplete responses and/or overbroad and unlawful redactions that are contrary to the FOIA statute, case law, and implementing agency regulations."

In a statement to NPR, ACLU said that those frustrations persist under the new administration. "CBP continues to treat the Freedom of Information Act with contempt," it says. "CBP routinely fails even to respond to FOIA requests and flouts its transparency obligations by forcing federal court intervention to pry loose information which the public is entitled to."

The ACLU says each lawsuit seeks "unique and local information" about how CBP implemented Trump's executive orders at specific airports and points of entry "in the midst of rapidly developing and sometimes conflicting government guidance."

Melendez says the ACLU doesn't know what it will uncover in the documents it seeks. "The number one goal is transparency and getting to the bottom of what happened," she says.

As NPR's Sam Sanders reported in March, the ACLU has raised more than $80 million since Donald Trump was elected on Nov. 8. It's part of a wave of "rage giving" among the progressive and vocal "Resistance" to the Trump presidency.

Related Content

As the Trump administration considers steps to implement what the president has called extreme vetting of foreigners at the border, one aspect of security screening has already been amped up.

The number of people who have been asked to hand over their cellphones and passwords by Customs and Border Protection agents has increased nearly threefold in recent years. This is happening to American citizens as well as foreign visitors.

President Trump's updated executive order, the one restricting travel from six Muslim-majority countries, is blocked for now.

But administrators at Northeastern University in Boston aren't taking any chances.

"We're in a state of limbo," says Mike Armini, who oversees government relations. "We don't quite know what's going to happen next, so we've advised them to stay here," he says, talking about the 250 Northeastern students from those six countries.

President Trump’s revised travel ban has been dealt another setback Thursday — from a federal court in Maryland. This after a federal judge in Hawaii ordered Wednesday night that the travel ban targeting six majority-Muslim countries be put on hold, just hours before it was to take effect.

Ask any veteran lawyer about her worst fear, and you'll hear this: the client who digs a hole for himself — and then keeps on digging.

The challenge of defending a difficult client is once again in the news this week as the Justice Department has struggled to convince federal judges that President Trump's executive order, imposing limits on travelers from six majority Muslim countries, is not, in fact, a ban on Muslims.

President Trump's second attempt at a "travel ban" was supposed to go into effect Thursday. Instead, the central components of the executive order have been blocked by judges on opposite sides of the country.

In both cases, the judges relied heavily on public statements from Trump and his advisers to conclude that the order — despite being "facially" neutral on religion — was designed to target Muslims.