Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Key war on terror architect Douglas Feith has now confirmed Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Wesley Clark in admitting that the so-called War on Terror is a hoax.

In fact, starting right after 9/11 -- at the latest -- the goal has always been to create "regime change" and instability in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Lebanon so as to protect Israel. And the goal was never really to destroy Al Qaeda.

Three weeks after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, former US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld established an official military objective of not only removing the Saddam Hussein regime by force but overturning the regime in Iran, as well as in Syria and four other countries in the Middle East, according to a document quoted extensively in then-under secretary of defense for policy Douglas Feith's recently published account of the Iraq war decisions. Feith's account further indicates that this aggressive aim of remaking the map of the Middle East by military force and the threat of force was supported explicitly by the country's top military leaders.

Feith's book, War and Decision, released last month, provides excerpts of the paper Rumsfeld sent to President George W Bush on September 30, 2001, calling for the administration to focus not on taking down Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network but on the aim of establishing "new regimes" in a series of states...

***

General Wesley Clark, who commanded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization bombing campaign in the Kosovo war, recalls in his 2003 book Winning Modern Wars being told by a friend in the Pentagon in November 2001 that the list of states that Rumsfeld and deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz wanted to take down included Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia [and Lebanon].

***

When this writer asked Feith . . . which of the six regimes on the Clark list were included in the Rumsfeld paper, he replied, "All of them."

***

The Defense Department guidance document made it clear that US military aims in regard to those states would go well beyond any ties to terrorism. The document said the Defense Department would also seek to isolate and weaken those states and to "disrupt, damage or destroy" their military capacities - not necessarily limited to weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Where does Israel come in?

Well, the Asia Times article continues:

Rumsfeld's paper was given to the White House only two weeks after Bush had approved a US military operation in Afghanistan directed against bin Laden and the Taliban regime. Despite that decision, Rumsfeld's proposal called explicitly for postponing indefinitely US airstrikes and the use of ground forces in support of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance in order to try to catch bin Laden.

Instead, the Rumsfeld paper argued that the US should target states that had supported anti-Israel forces such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

***After the bombing of two US embassies in East Africa [in 1988] by al-Qaeda operatives, State Department counter-terrorism official Michael Sheehan proposed supporting the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance in Afghanistan against bin Laden's sponsor, the Taliban regime. However, senior US military leaders "refused to consider it", according to a 2004 account by Richard H Shultz, Junior, a military specialist at Tufts University.

A senior officer on the Joint Staff told State Department counter-terrorism director Sheehan he had heard terrorist strikes characterized more than once by colleagues as a "small price to pay for being a superpower".

And if "terrorist strikes" were a "small price to pay for being a superpower"- and that is the reason that the U.S. government refused to disrupt the alleged planners of the 9/11 attacks - doesn't that add weight to the claim that the U.S. government intentionally allowed the 9/11 attacks to occur? In other words, doesn't this statement by a senior officer of the Joint Chiefs of Staff tend to prove that 9/11 was intentionally allowed to occur as the "New Pearl Harbor" which would allow America to act like "a superpower" and re-make the Middle East in its own (and Israel's) image?

This is not an unreasonable question, especially given that Feith, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and most of the other key architects of the "war on terror" were part of the Project for a New American Century and its plea for a "New Pearl Harbor" to justify expansion of American militarism and regime change in the Middle East.

And remember that many of the key members of PNAC and architects of the "war on terror" had previously created the "Clean Break" strategy for Israel, which called for a policy of war and regime change against Israel's enemies.

The war on terror was never intended to be about fighting terrorism. As even Newsweek and a top U.S. military advisor have now admitted, the war on terror is a hoax.

It appears that the War on Terror fraud is still going to be flashed in front of our faces from time to time—just to remind us that our inalienable right to not be searched and seized without probable cause, our right to face our accusers, or our right to be innocent until proven guilty are still on hold while the authorities fight the evil terrorist.

The latest reports—which claim that four black mentally challenged Moslems attempted to blow up synagogues and shoot down military aircrafts—read like a skit out of the old Dave Chappelle show. My favorite part was when one of the men, during the court hearing, told the judge that he had recently smoked marijuana but was “clear-headed enough to understand the proceedings.” I swear you cannot make this stuff up! This guy is ready to die for Islam and kill innocent people in the name of Allah—yet he smokes grass? These men didn’t even change their names to Moslem names.

James Cromitie, 55; David Williams, 28; Onta Williams, 32; and Laguerre Payen were all charged with conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction within the United States and conspiracy to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles. But as always, the FBI and CIA reportedly guided these men and provided them with the explosives. If these guys were infiltrated, and the authorities new of their intentions, why allow them to go through with the whole charade? The CIA is holding people in Guantanamo Bay and other parts of the world without any charges. They are holding people that they have secretly kidnapped. Why didn’t they kidnap these retards and hold them in a secret prison? I will tell you why. It is because this farce was purposely intended for you to see.

It is so obvious that these guys are nothing but retarded patsies. When using the word “retards”, I mean it literally. Payen's lawyer said he was "intellectually challenged" and on medication for schizophrenia. Another person said “He has a very low borderline IQ”.

According to the Associated Press, these guys new very little about Islam. The AP article states that their statements about Islam were constantly being corrected by the assistant Imam of the mosque they attended.

Plus, these men were all convicted felons with a rap sheet a mile long. This “created theater” appears to be another ploy to name the American public as the real terrorist. I guess Arab terrorists are out of style. First they claimed that al-Qaeda was recruiting blonde-haired blued white folks. Now, in an attempt to keep things fair and not be called racist, I guess al-Qaeda figured they would recruit black folks as well.

Perhaps al-Qaeda figured it was bad enough to be called terrorists; they didn’t want to also be called racist. Hence, to be fair, they gave these black guys a go at it. Also, remember Jose Padilla? Yep, al-Qaeda also recruits Latinos.

Blacks, whites, and Latinos make up about 95% of the total population of the United States. If things go according to plan, in a few years the typical American face will be the stereotypical terrorist. Now how do you like them apples?

It appears that the War on Terror fraud is still going to be flashed in front of our faces from time to time—just to remind us that our inalienable right to not be searched and seized without probable cause, our right to face our accusers, or our right to be innocent until proven guilty are still on hold while the authorities fight the evil terrorist.

The latest reports—which claim that four black mentally challenged Moslems attempted to blow up synagogues and shoot down military aircrafts—read like a skit out of the old Dave Chappelle show. My favorite part was when one of the men, during the court hearing, told the judge that he had recently smoked marijuana but was “clear-headed enough to understand the proceedings.” I swear you cannot make this stuff up! This guy is ready to die for Islam and kill innocent people in the name of Allah—yet he smokes grass? These men didn’t even change their names to Moslem names.

James Cromitie, 55; David Williams, 28; Onta Williams, 32; and Laguerre Payen were all charged with conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction within the United States and conspiracy to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles. But as always, the FBI and CIA reportedly guided these men and provided them with the explosives. If these guys were infiltrated, and the authorities new of their intentions, why allow them to go through with the whole charade? The CIA is holding people in Guantanamo Bay and other parts of the world without any charges. They are holding people that they have secretly kidnapped. Why didn’t they kidnap these retards and hold them in a secret prison? I will tell you why. It is because this farce was purposely intended for you to see.

It is so obvious that these guys are nothing but retarded patsies. When using the word “retards”, I mean it literally. Payen's lawyer said he was "intellectually challenged" and on medication for schizophrenia. Another person said “He has a very low borderline IQ”.

According to the Associated Press, these guys new very little about Islam. The AP article states that their statements about Islam were constantly being corrected by the assistant Imam of the mosque they attended.

Plus, these men were all convicted felons with a rap sheet a mile long. This “created theater” appears to be another ploy to name the American public as the real terrorist. I guess Arab terrorists are out of style. First they claimed that al-Qaeda was recruiting blonde-haired blued white folks. Now, in an attempt to keep things fair and not be called racist, I guess al-Qaeda figured they would recruit black folks as well.

Perhaps al-Qaeda figured it was bad enough to be called terrorists; they didn’t want to also be called racist. Hence, to be fair, they gave these black guys a go at it. Also, remember Jose Padilla? Yep, al-Qaeda also recruits Latinos.

Blacks, whites, and Latinos make up about 95% of the total population of the United States. If things go according to plan, in a few years the typical American face will be the stereotypical terrorist. Now how do you like them apples?

Please Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to workPlease Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to workPlease Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to workPlease Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to workPlease Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to workPlease Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to workPlease Enable Javascript for this Oil Price widget to work