so this seems almost like a law of karma, which causes things to bounce back to natural balance in a manner of speaking.

would you please explain a bit or two...of your views about karma?

also this reminds me about how body and mind reacts to extremes, as opposites can be experienced as the same.

Karma is like Newtons Law - for every action exists a positive or negative reaction.

It might not be today or tomorrow or the next week, but it will come back around eventually.

And there I was thinking you couldn't stoop any lower...
You don't get it, do you? Your ego blots out everything, it's hard to watch.

What does it mean, every action causes a reaction, is just that. No reward or punishment, just development.
To compare a natural law to an invention of a hierarchy based suppressing society is indeed mind blowing and probably the sign of what an 》¿⊙#
you are.
₩♧☆|~ like no other member of ATS. You're really the d&%$#@×÷ EVER and yet you think you're so wise it is just rank.

karma means the opposite for me, the point being, we should be IT, each one of us in our own way!
Learning being the point, that is the only thing it matters in our life and until we do not learn what we need to, we will be stuck in my
opinion...until life shows us, whether we want it or not because sometimes we can be very stubborn or blind due to attachments and clinging to wrong
views.

karma means in a way - every action counts, every thought and emotion...nothing is separated and everything is related to cause and effect and
conditioned to something other...at least this is how it seems to me from relative point of view.

if you would like to read about it, i am implying also the twelve links of causation from buddhist perspective.

just to emphasize - it means self responsibility, conviction and self effort to learn spreading inner light around us in any way or form...moment.

so this seems almost like a law of karma, which causes things to bounce back to natural balance in a manner of speaking.

would you please explain a bit or two...of your views about karma?

also this reminds me about how body and mind reacts to extremes, as opposites can be experienced as the same.

Karma is like Newtons Law - for every action exists a positive or negative reaction.

It might not be today or tomorrow or the next week, but it will come back around eventually.

And there I was thinking you couldn't stoop any lower...
You don't get it, do you? Your ego blots out everything, it's hard to watch.

What does it mean, every action causes a reaction, is just that. No reward or punishment, just development.
To compare a natural law to an invention of a hierarchy based suppressing society is indeed mind blowing and probably the sign of what an 》¿⊙#
you are.
₩♧☆|~ like no other member of ATS. You're really the d&%$#@×÷ EVER and yet you think you're so wise it is just rank.

Hello Chuckster.
If you are outside of time: is the majority of Mankind inside time? If so: please describe the difference between the two.
-
Do you experience vibrations and frequencies, the same as other humans?

originally posted by: Nothin
Hello Chuckster.
If you are outside of time: is the majority of Mankind inside time? If so: please describe the difference between the two.
-
Do you experience vibrations and frequencies, the same as other humans?

Peace.

You know those people that seem like they glow with joy, happiness, kindness and are down to earth? Literally they radiate energy it's insane to even
consider the notion, it's like a vibrational frequency that they emit and you just want to stick around it. All humans have the built in mechanism
when it comes to vibrations and frequencies, they know something is wrong before it goes wrong. Some are just more accustomed to the ability to
physiologically and psychologically observe and sense energy, it's in built it's there and everyone has it, some just use it more and better than
others.

Majority of mankind is inside time yes, to be outside time is all I can say really really weird your perception fractures. Picture staring inside a
mirror and you see yourself staring into the same mirror, while other you is staring at another you inside another mirror and the loop goes on. Same
goes for backwards notion of the past, which ever you that you are now is merely a perception of another you. At a stage it nearly drove me insane
and it actually proves the logical explanation why one can not predict the future to 100% accuracy.

As the time line dilation between the subject you of the perceived origin may see one thing, while the other you of the parallel origin is
experiencing the same thing but with additional details. The closest accuracy that I was able to ever achieve was 60% barely even scratching the
surface of the 50% most times, it is also the reason why I haven't cheated my way at winning the lottery.

There are too many variables and too many parallel notions that may merge with your current state resulting in an altered result to the originally
perceived outcome. This is also the problem with time travel and why in the future it's going to cause a lot of problems, although we will be able to
achieve the notion of time manipulation (even though it would not be manipulation more of going with the stream). We will not be able to properly
allocate the correct timeline to have enough impact on the current timeline, thusly rendering us as one would say "Trying to put together an IKEA
cupboard in pitch darkness".

So, Yes time travel is possible, but allocating and calculating the correct co-ordinates of the right timeline are astronomically impossible.

On, occasional basis we also have a process called the merge, where two parallels merge with one another thusly creating a paradox. It is the very
same paradox humans know as Deja Vu when two parallels with similar events merge they experience time lag, you know what is going to happen and yet
you have no slightest notion as to why. Also for a smoother transition one of the 2 parallels alters the event details ever so slightly, basically
fine tuning and adjusting the transition of time. The architecture of time and the principals that go with understanding it are very limited for our
current linguistics, all I can say that at this moment our thesis and understanding of time are nothing but a theoretical concept. A human based
concept lacking in the vast potential applications that it can yield.

So, Yes time travel is possible, but allocating and calculating the correct co-ordinates of the right timeline are astronomically impossible.

I am not the first person to discuss it, but for whatever reason reading it in these pages in conjunction with some of the threads in this discussion
forum made me consider the idea from a different perspective. I love language, and consider language to be one of our primary methods of manipulating
reality. I tend to dissect language when words are presented to me. What is interesting about the statement "nothing is real" is that while it is
clearly a statement of words, it is also a mathematical statement:

0=R

Where "R" is "real" or "reality". In this format, the mathematical statement is for the most part the same as the verbal statement. However, with the
equation something deeper is revealed. "R" represents a variable concept, arguably what "reality" essentially is. 0, however, is a constant
value...the lack of value or nil. This suggests that "reality" is in fact a non-state, a state of emptiness. All other concepts...all other values,
thus become "unreal". Having value negates the "reality" of item or event in question, according to the equation 0="R".

But, let us take the statement "nothing is real" a step further. The word "nothing" is actually a contraction of two words, "no" and "thing", each
with a distinct meaning. "No" is essentially "anti", "non", "none", or the reversal of some state. "Thing" is essentially a variable has yet to be
defined, but is a variable in a state of being. Mathematically, the equation changes:

-X=R

Where "X" is the variable concept "thing" and "R" is the variable concept "reality". A deeper concept reveals itself. "Thing" is a state of being.
"Reality" thus becomes the state of non-being. Any other state of being becomes "unreal"...a delusion of perception.

Lets consider some other philosophical arguments regarding "reality".

R=>0<

This is meant to represent the idea that "reality is everything", but my keyboard lacks an infinity symbol. This idea of course creates a paradox; for
"reality" to be everything, it would need to also be everything that is "unreal". All concepts, delusions, imaginings, become "real" and all
definition becomes pointless. We would thus find that:

>0

To recap about at which upon reaching the highest level the ability to create a universe is achievable then consider the possibility that our own
universe was conceived in such a manner. This notion is so compelling to me that it began my life's journey as a magi many years past. I once had the
privilege of communication with a highly intelligent, but malevolent entity from Universe B. It claimed to me that it created this universe simply
because it could and hinted that it could make it cease to be if it so wished. That's the short version and I will not go into detail what else it
claimed for it greatly unsettled me. However I establish contact again a few years from now. You see all my knowledge concerning this comes from the
future. I'm just waiting to catch myself up. We all are.

All the thoughts, images and behaviors which we attach to ourselves are of a false reality and with such a realization one becomes 'awake', thus
personal integrity is maintained because all the actions that proceed from that are pure in intent. And besides, the Molly alter is under guarded lock
and key and is self programmed meme-hack of my mind. l am permitted to say no more about Molly so please don't ask.

but even just making this thread is you implying that you have more enlightening information then others, why would that be?

To who's perception would that be? To me I'm just like anyone else but merely someone who decided to pay attention instead of being glued to a screen.
To others I would be seen as someone who is more enlightened or supernatural etc.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.