]]>By: Joey Beninghovehttps://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2010/05/28/the-ruby-rails-life-my-rails-3-stack-part-2/#comment-134
Joey BeninghoveFri, 28 May 2010 14:15:11 +0000/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2010/05/28/the-ruby-rails-life-my-rails-3-stack-part-2.aspx#comment-134@Derick,
Yeah, I had no idea about the "let" and "subject" keywords either until I saw Larkowski's presentation. Also need to check out the Shoulda matchers which look pretty handy too.@Derick,
Yeah, I had no idea about the “let” and “subject” keywords either until I saw Larkowski’s presentation. Also need to check out the Shoulda matchers which look pretty handy too.
]]>By: derick.baileyhttps://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2010/05/28/the-ruby-rails-life-my-rails-3-stack-part-2/#comment-133
derick.baileyFri, 28 May 2010 14:00:04 +0000/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2010/05/28/the-ruby-rails-life-my-rails-3-stack-part-2.aspx#comment-133DUDE... why didn't i know about that type of rspec syntax?! I've been doing the simple "describe" and "before" blocks for a really long time... that let stuff and context stuff you're doing looks awesome! will definitely help clean up my albacore tests with that. :)
DUDE… why didn’t i know about that type of rspec syntax?! I’ve been doing the simple “describe” and “before” blocks for a really long time… that let stuff and context stuff you’re doing looks awesome! will definitely help clean up my albacore tests with that.
]]>