“Currently, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants every year, with more than 70 percent coming to the country through the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an UNLIMITED relatives to the U.S. In the next 20 years, the current U.S. legal immigration system is on track to import 15 million new foreign-born voters. Between 7 and 8 million of those foreign-born will arrive in the U.S. through chain migration.” JOHN BINDER

The lifetime costs of Social Security and Medicare
benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s executive
amnesty would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage Foundation
expert Robert Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained in advance
by Breitbart News.

Rector, a senior research fellow at
Heritage, is slated to speak on the costs of Obama’s executive amnesty Tuesday
before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. He will testify to
the high entitlement costs of granting legal status to millions of illegal
immigrants.

Based on Rector’s calculations, which
assume that at least 3.97 illegal immigrants would apply for and receive legal
status under Deferred Action for Parents of U.S. citizens and legal permanent
residents (DAPA), and that the average DAPA beneficiary would have a 10th grade
education, the costs would be immense.

Specifically, in 2010 dollars, the
lifetime costs of Social Security benefits to DAPA beneficiaries would be about
$1.3 trillion.

He further estimates that DAPA
recipients would $7.8 billion each year once they have access to the refundable
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the refundable Additional Child Tax Credit
(ACTC). Further, the retroactive costs of the EITC and ACTC— current IRS policy
will allow amnesty recipients to claim up to
three years of tax benefits for illegal work — Rector expects to be as high
as $23.5 billion.

The Heritage expert notes that DAPA
eligible families are already able to claim certain welfare benefits — such as
food stamps, Medicaid, and Women, Infants and Children program (WIC) — on
behalf of their U.S.-born children.

“The average DAPA eligible family
already receives around $6,600 per year in means-tested welfare benefits, prior
to Obama’s executive action. (The aggregate cost is around $13.4 billion per
year.)” his testimony reads.

And while DAPA recipients are not
eligible for Obamacare, Rector argues that future legislation could eventually
make such DAPA-eligible families able to get coverage under Obamacare — at a
cost of $14 billion annually.

“On average, the combined cost of
means-tested welfare benefits currently received, the EITC and ACTC cash, and
potential Obamacare benefits would come to $17,800 per year per DAPA family,”
Rector’s testimony reads. “The aggregate cost would be over $35 billion per
year.”

In terms of what DAPA eligible
individuals would contribute in tax payments once they are “on the books,” Rector
estimates that “Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) and federal income
tax revenues would increase by about $7.2 billion per year.”

“Nonetheless, the increase in tax
revenue would be equaled or outweighed by the increase in EITC and ACTC cash payments,”
the testimony concludes. “The value of total means-tested welfare benefits
received by DAPA eligible families exceeded the value of FICA and federal
income tax payments made by those families before the executive action and will
continue to do so after the action as well.”

Rector further assumes that the
granting of executive amnesty “will encourage increased illegal immigration in
the future, imposing further costs on taxpayers.”

"The amnesty alone will be the largest
expansion of the welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector,
a senior analyst at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary
Committee field hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to
hit their peak around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very
narrow time horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If
even a small fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on
Medicaid, you're looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year.”
(CALIFORNIA ALREADY PAYS OUT $25 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS ON THE
STATE LEVEL ALONE AND NOW LA RAZA CONTROLS THE STATELEGISLATURE AND ARE VOTING FOR EVEN MORE)

Obama’s State of Delusion

22 January 2015

“The delusional character of Obama’s State of the Union address on Tuesday—presenting an America of rising living standards and a booming economy, capped by his declaration that the “shadow of crisis has passed”—is perhaps matched only in its presentation by the media and supporters of the Democratic Party.”

“The general tone was set by the New York Times in its lead editorial on Wednesday, which described the speech as a “simple, dramatic message about economic fairness, about the fact that the well-off—the top earners, the big banks, Silicon Valley—have done just great, while middle and working classes remain dead in the water.”

Border Patrol Agent: We are Punished for Reporting Illegal Alien Groups of More Than 20

WASHINGTON, DC — A U.S. Border Patrol agent from the Rio Grande Valley Sector in Texas told lawmakers today that his fellow agents are punished for reporting illegal alien groups of more than 20. “Agents who repeatedly report groups larger than 20 face retribution. Management will either take them out of the field and assign them to processing detainees at the station or assign them to a fixed position in low volume areas as punishment,” Border Patrol agent Chris Cabrera told a Senate panel. “Needless to say Agents got the message and now stay below this 20 person threshold no matter the actual size of the group.”

Cabrera is the vice president of the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) Local 3307, a union for border agents. He testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee on behalf of NBPC.

The border agent told lawmakers that the Obama administration is misleading the American people by manipulating border security data.

Cabrera also told lawmakers that the 6 out of every 10 illegal aliens who attempt to cross the southwest border into the United States are not apprehended.

“Ask any line Agent in the field and he or she will tell you that at best we apprehend 35-40% of the illegal immigrants attempting to cross. This number is even lower for drug smugglers who are much more adept at eluding capture,” he said.

U.S. Border Patrol is a component of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency. CBP operates under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

“If you ask this question of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or senior management at Customs and Border Protection (CBP), they will tell you the border is secure,” testified Cabrera. “They may even point to statistics and metrics showing that the Border Patrol is 75% effective in apprehending illegal immigrants and drug smugglers.”

“I want to be crystal clear – the border is not secure,” he continued.

The Rio Grande Valley Sector is one of the busiest corridors for illegal cross-border activity.

That total includes 476 illegal aliens (23%) who had re-entered the United
States after previously being deported, federal officials said Monday at a joint press conference by ICE and the Department of Homeland
Security.

*

Of the 2,059 criminals arrested, 1,013 -- almost half -- had been convicted
of more than one crime; and 1,036 had been convicted of a felony, including
voluntary manslaughter, child pornography, robbery and kidnapping.

*

Of the total 2,059 criminals arrested, 58 are known gang members or
affiliates, and 89 are convicted sex offenders.

*

An additional 912 illegal aliens were arrested for multiple
"significant misdemeanors," mostly repeated convictions for driving
under the influence.

“The summary of the proposal read: “Eliminates constitutional protections for vested pension and retiree healthcare benefits for current public employees, including teachers, nurses, and peace officers, for future work performed.”

THE OBAMA PLAN: AS GENERATED FROM THE ASSAULT OF DETROIT BY OBAMA’S CRONIES: CUT PENSIONS, AND WAGES AND BUILD THE MEX WELFARE STATE AT THE SAME TIME!

WHILE OBAMA HAS BILLIONS FOR MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS, HE HAD NOTHING TO HAND DETROIT BUT HIS LOOTING CRONY BANKSTERS!

“The assault on pensions enjoys the bipartisan support of the entire political establishment, all the way to the White House. Behind the scenes, the Obama Administration played a decisive role in pushing through the Detroit bankruptcy.”

OBAMA IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MEXICO ELECTS OUR PRESIDENTS. DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, TWO-THIRDS OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL AND BANKSTER PROFITS AND CRIMES SOARED AS DID FORECLOSURES THESE BANKS CAUSED!

The dismal jobs situation in the United States is not merely the product of abstract economic forces, but the direct result of the policy of the ruling class, led by the Obama administration, in response to the economic crisis. Since the collapse of 2008, the government has devoted itself to bailing out the banks, then initiating a policy through the Federal Reserve of funneling hundreds of billions of dollars into the stock market.

The assault on the working class continues. While preparing to spend billions of dollars on a new war against Syria, the federal government has rejected any financial assistance to Detroit, where an unelected emergency manager has thrown the city into bankruptcy in order to impose wage cuts and layoffs on city workers, while decimating pensions and other benefits. This is seen as a model for cities throughout the country.

CRONY CAPITALISM...the rise of Barack Obama and the fall of America!

OBAMA'S ASSAULT ON AMERICA -WHY WALL STREET, ILLEGALS, CRIMINAL BANKSTERS and the 1% LOVE HIM, AND THE MIDDLE CLASS GETS THE SHAFT TO PAY FOR HIS CRONY CAPITALISM

CEO pay is higher than ever, as is the chasm separating the rich and super-rich from everyone else. The incomes of the top 1 percent grew more than 11 percent between 2009 and 2011—the first two years of the Obama “recovery”—while the incomes of the bottom 99 percent actually shrank.

Meanwhile, Obama is pressing forward with

his proposal, outlined in his budget for the

next fiscal year, to slash $400 billion from

Medicare and $130 billion from Social

Security…

A Question of Citizenship… IN MEXIFORNIA,
ILLEGALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN LEGALS!

A
Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Tuesday,
August 10, 2010

Trust
Republicans to go too far. They take a good idea -- such as the notion that the
federal government should enforce immigration laws, and states should be able
to help -- and then drive it into the fringes. Witness a Fox News interview in
which Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., declared, "We should change our
Constitution and say if you come here illegally, and you have a child, that
child is automatically not a citizen."

Graham
has supported a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He opposed the
new Arizona immigration law. So why would he advocate repealing part of the
14th Amendment -- which, by the way, exists because the Grand Old Party wanted
to stop efforts to keep freed slaves from becoming citizens?

Graham's
right about this much: Illegal immigrants have taken advantage of the law. The
Dallas Morning News reported Sunday that 60,000 babies are born annually in
Texas to illegal immigrants. Last year, these "anchor babies"
accounted for 16 percent of the state's births.

But
it's not clear how many illegal immigrants are coming here to have babies as
opposed to having babies in America because they are here.

Then
there's the recent Washington Post story about "birth tourism" and
affluent expectant mothers paying offshore consultants a $14,750 fee to obtain
tourism visas that allow them to give birth in the United States and win U.S.
citizenship for their babies.

No
one likes to see adults game the system. In June, pollster Scott Rasmussen
found that 58 percent of voters say a child born to an illegal immigrant should
not automatically become a citizen of the United States.

But
there are better ways to deal with those abuses. Direct the State Department to
deny visas to would-be birth tourists. Keep the heat on employers who knowingly
hire illegal workers. The new Arizona immigration law is designed to achieve
"attrition through enforcement." Deport more adults who, unlike
children, knowingly break the law.

But
some Republicans want to keep going. Rep.
Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is arguing that the 14th Amendment does not and never did
confer automatic birthright citizenship.

Section One states, "All persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"There are two elements, birth and
subject to the jurisdiction," Chapman University Law School Dean John C.
Eastman told me. "For about 50 years, we've just assumed birth was all you
needed." But a review of the original debates and early court cases
demonstrates a recognition that parents had to "show allegiance." If
they broke federal law, they "never qualified" as being under U.S.
jurisdiction.

This
is where the argument gets dicey. Eastman has argued that a child born to a
Saudi in the United States on a temporary student visa was not under U.S.
jurisdiction, as the father had not declared allegiance to America. Eastman's
answer is to let people come here to study or work, but as something less than
guests.

This
path could turn a melting pot nation into an empire of the native born and
law-abiding foreign workers who never have a chance to belong. Think Old
Europe. Think Saudi Arabia.

But don't think

TURNING
YOUR PENSION OVER TO THE ILLEGALS? They already have your job!

By Kevin Martinez 17 March 2015

Chuck Reed, the former Democratic Mayor of San Jose, is planning to reintroduce a ballot measure that would eliminate constitutional protections for public employee pensions in California, Reuters reported last week.

Starting in May, Reed and a coalition of businesses and politicians will begin the process of gathering enough signatures to place a measure on the 2016 ballot that would allow the state to slash CalPERS, the $300 billion state employee retirement fund which manages the pension obligations of more than 3,000 state and local agencies.

LA RAZA-OCCUPATION and LOOTING in MEXIFORNIA…. shocking!

“Californians bear an enormous fiscal
burden as a result of an illegal alien population estimated at almost 3 million
residents. The annual expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services
for that population is $25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of
about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S. citizen.”

“Until the dishonesty
and tactical bluster cease, California is at serious risk of becoming a Third
World entity, and the longer Democrats are in power, the more businesses will
continue to flee the state, the more wealthy taxpayers will relocate and the
more our standard of living will continue to decline.”

Opinion

California
must stem the flow of illegal immigrants

The
state should go after employers who hire them, curb taxpayer-funded benefits,
deploy the National Guard to help the feds at the border and penalize
'sanctuary' cities.
“Illegal immigration is another matter entirely. With the state budget in
tatters, millions of residents out of work and a state prison system strained
by massive overcrowding, California simply cannot continue to ignore the strain
that illegal immigration puts on our budget and economy. Illegal aliens cost
taxpayers in our state billions of dollars each year. As economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal
immigrants impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions
of dollars."

Low-Income Workers Fleeing California

Wall Street Journal reporter Allysia Finley on low-income
people fleeing California, in addition to the rich.

“The summary of the proposal read: “Eliminates constitutional protections for vested pension and retiree healthcare benefits for current public employees, including teachers, nurses, and peace officers, for future work performed.”

THE OBAMA PLAN: AS GENERATED FROM THE ASSAULT OF DETROIT BY OBAMA’S CRONIES: CUT PENSIONS, AND WAGES AND BUILD THE MEX WELFARE STATE AT THE SAME TIME!

WHILE OBAMA HAS BILLIONS FOR MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS, HE HAD NOTHING TO HAND DETROIT BUT HIS LOOTING CRONY BANKSTERS!

“The assault on pensions enjoys the bipartisan support of the entire political establishment, all the way to the White House. Behind the scenes, the Obama Administration played a decisive role in pushing through the Detroit bankruptcy.”

OBAMA IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MEXICO ELECTS OUR PRESIDENTS. DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, TWO-THIRDS OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL AND BANKSTER PROFITS AND CRIMES SOARED AS DID FORECLOSURES THESE BANKS CAUSED!

The dismal jobs situation in the United States is not merely the product of abstract economic forces, but the direct result of the policy of the ruling class, led by the Obama administration, in response to the economic crisis. Since the collapse of 2008, the government has devoted itself to bailing out the banks, then initiating a policy through the Federal Reserve of funneling hundreds of billions of dollars into the stock market.

The assault on the working class continues. While preparing to spend billions of dollars on a new war against Syria, the federal government has rejected any financial assistance to Detroit, where an unelected emergency manager has thrown the city into bankruptcy in order to impose wage cuts and layoffs on city workers, while decimating pensions and other benefits. This is seen as a model for cities throughout the country.

CRONY CAPITALISM...the rise of Barack Obama and the fall of America!

OBAMA'S ASSAULT ON AMERICA -WHY WALL STREET, ILLEGALS, CRIMINAL BANKSTERS and the 1% LOVE HIM, AND THE MIDDLE CLASS GETS THE SHAFT TO PAY FOR HIS CRONY CAPITALISM

CEO pay is higher than ever, as is the chasm separating the rich and super-rich from everyone else. The incomes of the top 1 percent grew more than 11 percent between 2009 and 2011—the first two years of the Obama “recovery”—while the incomes of the bottom 99 percent actually shrank.

Meanwhile, Obama is pressing forward with

his proposal, outlined in his budget for the

next fiscal year, to slash $400 billion from

Medicare and $130 billion from Social

Security…

A Question of Citizenship… IN MEXIFORNIA,
ILLEGALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN LEGALS!

A
Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Tuesday,
August 10, 2010

Trust
Republicans to go too far. They take a good idea -- such as the notion that the
federal government should enforce immigration laws, and states should be able
to help -- and then drive it into the fringes. Witness a Fox News interview in
which Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., declared, "We should change our
Constitution and say if you come here illegally, and you have a child, that
child is automatically not a citizen."

Graham
has supported a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He opposed the
new Arizona immigration law. So why would he advocate repealing part of the
14th Amendment -- which, by the way, exists because the Grand Old Party wanted
to stop efforts to keep freed slaves from becoming citizens?

Graham's
right about this much: Illegal immigrants have taken advantage of the law. The
Dallas Morning News reported Sunday that 60,000 babies are born annually in
Texas to illegal immigrants. Last year, these "anchor babies"
accounted for 16 percent of the state's births.

But
it's not clear how many illegal immigrants are coming here to have babies as
opposed to having babies in America because they are here.

Then
there's the recent Washington Post story about "birth tourism" and
affluent expectant mothers paying offshore consultants a $14,750 fee to obtain
tourism visas that allow them to give birth in the United States and win U.S.
citizenship for their babies.

No
one likes to see adults game the system. In June, pollster Scott Rasmussen
found that 58 percent of voters say a child born to an illegal immigrant should
not automatically become a citizen of the United States.

But
there are better ways to deal with those abuses. Direct the State Department to
deny visas to would-be birth tourists. Keep the heat on employers who knowingly
hire illegal workers. The new Arizona immigration law is designed to achieve
"attrition through enforcement." Deport more adults who, unlike
children, knowingly break the law.

But
some Republicans want to keep going. Rep.
Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is arguing that the 14th Amendment does not and never did
confer automatic birthright citizenship.

Section One states, "All persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"There are two elements, birth and
subject to the jurisdiction," Chapman University Law School Dean John C.
Eastman told me. "For about 50 years, we've just assumed birth was all you
needed." But a review of the original debates and early court cases
demonstrates a recognition that parents had to "show allegiance." If
they broke federal law, they "never qualified" as being under U.S.
jurisdiction.

This
is where the argument gets dicey. Eastman has argued that a child born to a
Saudi in the United States on a temporary student visa was not under U.S.
jurisdiction, as the father had not declared allegiance to America. Eastman's
answer is to let people come here to study or work, but as something less than
guests.

This
path could turn a melting pot nation into an empire of the native born and
law-abiding foreign workers who never have a chance to belong. Think Old
Europe. Think Saudi Arabia.

But don't think

TURNING YOUR PENSION OVER TO THE ILLEGALS? They already have your job!

Driven solely by profit considerations, Shell, ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron and the other companies neglect infrastructure repairs, refuse to hire full-time workers and exploit the present workforce to the point of exhaustion, indifferent to the explosions, fires and environment damage that result with alarming regularity.

Tens of millions of workers in the US and around the world—who have suffered eroding living standards even as corporate profits and the stock markets hit record highs—support the fight of the oil workers. Once again, however, the greatest obstacle to the unification of the working class has proven to be the pro-capitalist and nationalist trade unions, which sabotaged the strike and are now seeking to impose the dictates of corporate management and the Obama administration.

The work that the 400 SCE IT employees do isn't disappearing,
instead it and their jobs are being taken over by foreign guestworkers here on
H-1B visas.

A Question of Citizenship… IN MEXIFORNIA,
ILLEGALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN LEGALS!

A
Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Tuesday,
August 10, 2010

Trust
Republicans to go too far. They take a good idea -- such as the notion that the
federal government should enforce immigration laws, and states should be able
to help -- and then drive it into the fringes. Witness a Fox News interview in
which Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., declared, "We should change our
Constitution and say if you come here illegally, and you have a child, that
child is automatically not a citizen."

Graham
has supported a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He opposed the
new Arizona immigration law. So why would he advocate repealing part of the
14th Amendment -- which, by the way, exists because the Grand Old Party wanted
to stop efforts to keep freed slaves from becoming citizens?

Graham's
right about this much: Illegal immigrants have taken advantage of the law. The
Dallas Morning News reported Sunday that 60,000 babies are born annually in
Texas to illegal immigrants. Last year, these "anchor babies"
accounted for 16 percent of the state's births.

But
it's not clear how many illegal immigrants are coming here to have babies as
opposed to having babies in America because they are here.

Then
there's the recent Washington Post story about "birth tourism" and
affluent expectant mothers paying offshore consultants a $14,750 fee to obtain
tourism visas that allow them to give birth in the United States and win U.S.
citizenship for their babies.

No
one likes to see adults game the system. In June, pollster Scott Rasmussen
found that 58 percent of voters say a child born to an illegal immigrant should
not automatically become a citizen of the United States.

But
there are better ways to deal with those abuses. Direct the State Department to
deny visas to would-be birth tourists. Keep the heat on employers who knowingly
hire illegal workers. The new Arizona immigration law is designed to achieve
"attrition through enforcement." Deport more adults who, unlike
children, knowingly break the law.

But
some Republicans want to keep going. Rep.
Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is arguing that the 14th Amendment does not and never did
confer automatic birthright citizenship.

Section One states, "All persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"There are two elements, birth and
subject to the jurisdiction," Chapman University Law School Dean John C.
Eastman told me. "For about 50 years, we've just assumed birth was all you
needed." But a review of the original debates and early court cases
demonstrates a recognition that parents had to "show allegiance." If
they broke federal law, they "never qualified" as being under U.S.
jurisdiction.

This
is where the argument gets dicey. Eastman has argued that a child born to a
Saudi in the United States on a temporary student visa was not under U.S.
jurisdiction, as the father had not declared allegiance to America. Eastman's
answer is to let people come here to study or work, but as something less than
guests.

This
path could turn a melting pot nation into an empire of the native born and
law-abiding foreign workers who never have a chance to belong. Think Old
Europe. Think Saudi Arabia.

But don't think

TURNING YOUR PENSION OVER TO THE ILLEGALS? They already have your job!