First edition published
30 May 2010Last updated 24 June 2012
Editor's Notes and other commentary provided
by William
B. Fox, unless otherwise indicated

Contents

Update References,
Misc Other ArticlesAppendix I: Dr.
Lothrop Stoddard describes Nordics and Alpines in Chapter
I of Racial
Realities in EuropeAppendix II: Group
vs. Private Property, a Brief OverviewAppendix III: Bernie
Madoff: A Recent Financial World Poster Boy of High Level
Jewish EvilAppendix IV: American
History and Genuine Nationalism, Tribalism and Nationalism,
Nationalist Axioms and Decision Rules, Nationalism and the
Ideological SpectrumAppendix V: Walt
Disney and The ChosenAppendix VI: The
Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance, and the
Neanderthal-Troll ConnectionAppendix VII: Part
III - The Deluge On the Dikes, Chapter
XI, The Inner Dikes from The
Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy
by Lothrop Stoddard, A.M., Ph.D. (Harvard)An
interesting account about how the importation of low cost
alien labor can boomerang against an indigenous population.Appendix VIII:A Final Note: Nothing Is So Serious
That We Still Can't Get Some Laughsor Other
EntertainmentAnd now for a joke about Iceland
and its 2010 volcanic eruption...and a lead on a hot Icelandic
female singer.

2010-01-08 To
The People Of Iceland - Say NO! To Icesave by
Hans J. Lysglimt explains from libertarian perspective how
governments and EU often act for own interests at expense
of video. This is the epic moment where the people of Iceland
decide ont heir destiny. If they say "No," then
EU will fall, and will strengthen the power of the people
at government expense. The government and financial system
is rotten to the core. Iceland should become the Hong Kong
of the Arctic area. Have free currency, to include use of
gold.
2009-03-16 Trailer
for movie Dreamland. A feature length documentary
about "the exploitation of the Icelandic nature that
leads to the crash of the economy. Based on a book by Andri
Snær Magnason, Dreamland - a Self Help Manual for
a Frightened Nation." Dreamland home
page. [Editor's Note: A 3 Dec 2009 Film
Review by Cecily Layzell gives me the impression
that the film takes a very leftist view of Iceland's economic
problems, blaming a vague notion of "corporate exploitation."
There appears to be no mention of Mossad-CIA subversion, economic
hit men, Jewish infiltration, and other important sociological
factors. Often it is more "the men who make the system
than the system that makes the men." Questions such as
who own the equity in the projects, who comprises
the power elite, the quality of the business plans
(do they provide a likely return on investment or instead
reflect costly boondoggles that simply drive up overall indebtedness?),
where the money is coming from, and other agendas
(such as the desire by George Soros and other Rothschild confederates
to turn Iceland into a global banking leader of speculative
finance) must be honestly explored before one can intelligently
discuss the development of hard industries like aluminum smelting,
geothermal, and hydropower in Iceland. In Part
4 I explain why I favor the development of hard industries
for Iceland as its best (or "least bad") option,
provided that most control is retained by Icelandic (Nordic)
nationalists and most benefits accrue to Icelandic shareholders,
Icelandic workers, and the Icelandic people. The main problem
with Iceland's industrial projects between 1990's and first
decade of the 21st century is that many of them constituted
a counterfeit form of industrial development promulgated by
alien peoples who do not have the best interests of the Icelandic
people at heart. Apparently many of them also lacked a healthy
sentiment to protect the natural environment for all future
generations. As a final comment, when a documentary makes
too many lies by omission by not explicitly identifying plutocratic
Jewish subversives like George Soros and the Rothschild crime
family, its risks becoming a "limited hangout" operation
that can actually benefit globalist malefactors,
who will only repeat their destructive exploitation of various
peoples and their natural environments around the world until
somebody finally stops them. However, I have not evidence
that the documentary filmmakers for Dreamland deliberately
lied by omission. It is quite possible that it was hard enough
for them to make a documentary exposing how the Icelandic
government took on huge debt and suffered other hazardous
consequences (according to John Perkins, author of Diary
of An Economic Hit Man, in his 27 Aug 2010 interview
with Mel Fabregas of the Veritas Show, download Here)
to finance aggressive development of the aluminum industry]
2008-10-07 Iceland
Collapse Disaster, a farmanntv video narrated
in English by Norwegian Hans J. Lysglimt

2002-12-25 Medieval
Iceland and the Absence of Government by Thomas
Whiston, Mises Daily. A very important point for understanding
the character of the Icelandic people is the fact that their
ancestors achieved one of the most stable and longstanding
libertarian and republican societies in history.
2004 Patterns
in Time and the Tempo of Change: A North Atlantic Perspective
on the Evolution of Complex Societies by Kevin
P. Smith, from Evolution of Complex Societies. In Continuity
or Change: The Role of Analytical Scale in European Archaeology,
edited by James Matthieu and Rachel Scott, pp. 83-99. British
Archaeological Reports, International Series 1261, 2004. "Between
1175 and 1250 AD, medieval Icelanders transformed their society
from a network of decentralized simple chiefdoms into a unified
proto-state. Uniquely, a vast corpus of vernacular writing
- much written by the chieftains themselves - describes actors'
ideologies, histories, motivations and understandings of the
processes involved. .."

Wikipedia Articles
I have a lot of problems with the editorial slant of Wikipedia.
For example, it has edited articles to support the government
version of 9/11, and delisted
my article about Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup by Tom
Chittum. In my Mission
of Conscience Trilogy, at the beginning of many chapters
I quote what I call "the Wikipedia version of reality"
regarding various terror bombings as an example of "establishment
propaganda" --which I later contradict with evidence
of Mossad-CIA involvement later in each chapter. I take the
attitude that Wikipedia is dominated by trolls who support
Mossad-CIA and the rest of the military-industrial complex.
All this having been said, Wikipedia still has a lot of good
facts and background. Therefore, I link to the article below
provided that the reader understands my caveat:

The
Paris Club Referred to by Birgitta Jonsdottir
in her Alex Jones interview, according to Wikipedia "is
an informal group of financial officials from 19 of some of
the world's biggest economies, which provides financial services
such as debt restructuring, debt relief, and debt cancellation
to indebted countries and their creditors. Debtors are often
recommended by the International Monetary Fund after alternative
solutions have failed. It meets every six weeks at the French
Ministry of the Economy, Finance, and Industry in Paris."clubdeparis.org
Paris Club official web site. "The origin of the Paris
Club dates back to 1956 when Argentina agreed to meet its
public creditors in Paris. Since then, the Paris Club
has reached 413
agreements with 87
different debtor countries. Since 1956, the debt treated
in the framework of Paris Club agreements amounts to $540
billion."

IMF
home page at imf.org/
2007-12-09 Creature
from Jekyll Island ...IMF Part
4. G Edward Griffin Interview about UN scam, IMF, Global Agenda,
etc. July 2009.In video with G. Edward Griffin "Mr.
Griffin explains how the IMF (International Monetary Fund),
an agency of the United Nations, distributes taxpayers' money
that strengthens third world dictators." Libertarian
Property and Privatization: An Alternative Paradigm
by Kevin A. Carson "Privatization of state property,
as it is actually carried out is just another form of state
capitalist subsidy. In the first state, transnational capital
promotes infrastructure projects in Third World countries
that are essential to returns on Western capital in those
countries, as a way of subsidizing foreign investment there
at the expense of native taxpayers. Next, the resulting debt
load is used to discipline the country's government into carrying
out policies favorable to Western capital. And finally, under
the "structural adjustment" regime imposed by the
IMF and World Bank, the country is forced to sell assets (previously
paid for in the sweat of the native producing classes) to
Western capital at pennies on the dollar. Sean Corrigan ably
described the phenomenon in an article for LewRockwell.com":

2010-06-22 The
Meaning of "Austerity" by The Corbett
Report
2001-10-10 The
Globalizer Who Came In From the Cold, Joe Stiglitz:
Today's Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics by Greg Palast.
"This leads, predictably, to Step-Three-and-a-Half: what
Stiglitz calls, `The IMF riot.' The IMF riot is painfully
predictable. When a nation is, `down and out, [the IMF] takes
advantage and squeezes the last pound of blood out of them..'"

Alda Sigmundsdóttir:icelandweatherreport.com
Alda Sigmundsdóttir's blogposts
in The GuardianIceland's
bizarre Icesave referendum 8 Mar 2010: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
A recent Icelandic referendum on repaying the Icesave debt
was little more than political theatre of the absurdIceland's
fight for press freedom 16 Feb 2010: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
New legislation that proposes turning the island into a protective
'haven' for media could allow investigative journalism to
flourishThe
people of Iceland have spoken 16 Nov 2009: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
Icelanders gathered at a national assembly to brainstorm and
plan a future vision for the country. Will their wishes become
policy?McDonald's,
gone from Iceland 27 Oct 2009: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
It's farewell golden arches as Reykjavik's franchise-holder
ditches a brand that symbolises where Iceland went wrongRocking
Iceland's world 2 Apr 2009: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
Britain has filed a claim to the seabed around Rockall. Are
Icelanders bothered?At
last, Iceland's coalition collapses 26 Jan 2009: Alda
Sigmundsdóttir: Now the government has crumbled we
need all five parties to unite to restore our credibility
with the rest of the worldA
sinister email 23 Dec 2008: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
I seem to have made the Central Bank of Iceland feel uncomfortableMaking
a drama out of a credit crisis 19 Nov 2008: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:David
Oddsson, head of Iceland's central bank, surely can't hold
on much longer. He's rewriting history, but has nowhere to
hideExtortion
– or the only route to take? 18 Nov 2008: Alda Sigmundsdóttir:
Icelanders have mixed feelings when it comes to accepting
a loan from the International Monetary Fund

Dr.
Lothrop Stoddard provided a valuable overview of Nordic and
Alpine peoples of Europe in Chapter I of Racial
Realities in Europe, Copyright 1924, Charles
Scribner's Sons. The following is an extract::

...Down
to the fall of the Roman Empire, Germany was almost wholly
a Nordic land. Today it is mainly Alpine in race. Only in
Northwestern Germany is the population still predominantly
Nordic in blood. This change has come about through a long
series of wars, migrations, and other conditions that have
favored the Alpines at the Nordics' expense. It has also
profoundly changed the character of the German people. Compare
the solid, well-disciplined, docile German masses of to-day
with the restless, fiercely individualistic Teutonic tribes
that surged across the Roman world and turned Britain into
a Nordic Anglo-Saxon land!The
attitude of the present German people illustrates a trait
characteristic of Alpines generally -- the tendency to accept
the rule of masterful minorities. Left to themselves, Alpines
rarely build strong, enduring states, at least of any considerable
size. Whether this is due to lack of initiative and imagination,
or to still other defects, it is undoubtedly the case. The
Alpine manages

[page 15]

his local affairs well enough. With his strong
group feeling, he evolves village and regional organizations
that work smoothly. But beyond that his political sense
falters. The Alpines thus tend to form small political units,
which unite with difficulty and are more likely to be at
odds with one another. This is one of the chief reasons
why the Balkan peoples, who are of course mainly Alpines,
are always quarrelling and fighting among themselves.On
the other hand, where Alpines are under the guidance of
strong masters they can be disciplined into powerful states.
Russia is a notable example. The early Russians, who like
the other Slav tribes, were practically pure-blooded Alpines,
were divided into many groups at chronic odds with one another
and thus an easy prey to their neighbors. So intolerable
did this situation become that they actually invited in
foreign rulers, sending the following message to some Nordic
Scandinavian chiefs:"Our
land is great and has everything in abundance, but it lacks
order and justice. Come and take possession and rule over
us."The
Scandinavians came, established a strong government, and
laid the foundations of the mighty Russian Empire. From
that day to this Russia has been ruled mainly by persons
of non-Alpine blood. The present Bolshevik government is
no exception to the rule. Very few of its members spring
from the Alpine peasant masses."Peasant"
is in fact the term which best describes the typical Alpine.
Whether in France, South Germany, Poland or Russia, the
type is fundamentally the same. On the contrary, there are
no such peasant masses in

[page 16]

Scandinavia or the British Isles. Why? Because
there is no Alpine blood. Scandinavia is almost purely Nordic,
and the British Isles are either Nordic or Mediterranean
in race. The total absence of Alpine blood in the British
Isles is undoubtedly one of the chief reasons for the high
qualities of its inhabitants.For
despite the Alpine's many solid virtues, it seems to be
the least gifted of the three European stocks. Its type,
as already stated, is the peasant. In cities the Alpine
tends to be lower middle class -- what the French call petit
bourgeois. The effect of Alpine blood upon a nation, though
steadying, is also leveling, if not depressing. Compared
with either Nordics or Mediterraneans, the Alpine is a passive
element. The Alpine race has contributed little that is
truly great to politics, art or ideas. Yet its tenacity,
endurance, and vitality favor its steady growth, and wherever
it has a foothold it appears to be increasing at the expense
of the Nordic and Mediterranean elements.Let
us now consider the third great European stock-the Nordic
race. The Nordics seem to have originated in Northeastern
Europe, though the shores of the Baltic Sea have been the
racial centre since very early times.They
are a distinctly northern stock, inured to cold and storm;
but they do not thrive in hot, sunny southlands. They also
seem to take naturally to the sea. The outstanding characteristic
of the Nordic race is its restless creative energy. In this
peculiar quality it surpasses not only the other European
stocks but also all the other branches of mankind. The Nordics
are assuredly the most masterful breed that the world has

[page 17]

ever seen. For thousands of years they have
poured forth from their northland homes in conquering waves
over Europe and many parts of Asia as well. The Aryan invaders
of India were Nordics; so were the ancient Persians; while
the Greeks and Romans of classic times contained much Nordic
blood, at least among the ruling classes.Always
and everywhere the Nordics have been a race of warriors,
sailors, pioneers, and explorers. Unlike the Alpines, with
their slow mass migrations and peaceful penetration, the
Nordics have ranged far and wide, often in small numbers,
but winning their way by their fierce energy and great fighting
power. Conquering peoples sometimes vastly superior in numbers,
the Nordics have settled down as an aristocratic ruling
class, and they have usually known how to perpetuate their
rule because of their high political ability. Political
ability is one of the Nordics' chief gifts, which they display
both in ruling others and in ruling themselves.The
Nordic is at once democratic and aristocratic. Among his
own kind he is democratic. Profoundly individualistic and
touchy about his personal rights, neither he nor his fellows
will tolerate tyranny. None of the primitive Nordic tribes
had despotic rulers, while modern constitutional government
was developed by the Nordic English and has not been really
successful except among peoples with a strong strain of
Nordic blood. Where the Nordic establishes himself among
other races he is instinctively aristocratic. Feeling himself
the ruler and the superior, he prides himself on his race
and seeks to guard the purity of his blood. Throughout Europe

[page 18]

to-day the old aristocratic class tends to
be of Nordic origin. Even in countries where the Nordic
element has been mainly bred out of the population what
little Nordic blood remains is found chiefly concentrated
in the old upper-class families.Nothing
better illustrates the persistence of race qualities than
the way in which Nordics have everywhere shown the same
striking traits. From the dawn of history to the present
day they have acted very much the same. Look at the Nordic
Aryan invaders of India as described in the old Sanscrit
scriptures! Those first Nordics to appear upon the stage
of history entered India nearly 4000 years ago. Yet the
family likeness is unmistakable. Tall, fair; hard fighting,
yet jovial; loving good food, drink, fresh air, and exercise;
chivalrous toward their women; despising the little dark
negroid aborigines as monkeys, and setting up a rigid color
line -- how like our Anglo-Saxon pioneers! This description
of the ancient Aryans shows us merely one of the many Nordic
stocks that have racially perished. For not only in Asia
but also in Southern and Eastern Europe, Nordic elements,
once numerous and powerful, have either entirely disappeared
or today survive as mere lingering traces with scant significance
in the national life of the countries where they are found.
Only where Nordics have thoroughly occupied a country, expelling
or overwhelming the previous inhabitants, has the racial
conquest been prominent. The best European examples of this
are England and Scotland. The Anglo-Saxon invaders turned
both countries into Nordic lands, the former Mediterranean
population almost disappearing

[page 19]

In Wales and Ireland, on the contrary, the
Nordics never became more than a conquering aristocracy,
so that in those countries the old Mediterranean element
still forms the mass of the population.The
greatest expansion of the Nordic race has in fact occurred
outside Europe -- in the United States, Canada, Australia,
and New Zealand. Here the few aborigines of very primitive
types were quickly eliminated and populations of practically
pure Nordic type were established, since the pioneering
settlers were overwhelmingly of Nordic stock. The only exception
was the settlers of French Canada, who were mainly Alpine
in race. Whether these Nordic conquests will be racially
permanent is of course impossible to say. In the United
States especially, recent immigration has brought in floods
of Alpine and Mediterranean blood, and unless immigration
from Southern and Eastern Europe is restricted and kept
restricted the racial character of the American people will
be rapidly and radically altered. In Canada the French element
is showing the usual Alpine characteristics -- clinging
to the soil, sticking together, and slowly but surely enlarging
its racial area. However, in all these lands the Nordic
element still forms the bulk of the population and can,
if it so elects, secure its racial future.On
the continent of Europe Nordic race prospects are not so
bright. Everywhere save in Scandinavia -- where it forms
virtually the entire population -- the Nordic element seems
to be rapidly on the wane. Old handicaps, like war and migration,
which have penalized the race in the past have been supplemented
by new handicaps, like industrialism and city life, the
upshot being a steady decline

[page 20]

of the Nordics in favor of the Alpine and
Mediterranean elements.It
is really startling when one looks back into history and
sees how the Nordics have diminished racially in Europe
during the past 1000 years. Their heyday was the fall of
the Roman Empire. At that time and for centuries thereafter,
both Western and Central Europe were strongly Nordic. The
Alpine and Mediterranean elements were either reduced to
serfdom or driven into the more mountainous and infertile
regions.Since
then, however, the tide has been running the other way.
War has been a terrible scourge to the Nordic race. In the
numberless wars that have raged in Europe the Nordics have
done most of the fighting and suffered most of the losses,
while the age of discovery and colonization that began with
Columbus still further thinned their ranks in Europe, since
it was adventurous Nordics who formed the overwhelming majority
of explorers and pioneers to new lands. Perhaps even more
serious blows have been dealt the race by the conditions
of modem life.A
century ago Europe began to be transformed from an agricultural
to an urbanized, industrial area. Countless cities and manufacturing
centres grew up, where men were close packed and were subjected
to all the evils of congested living. Of course, such conditions
are not ideal for any stock. Nevertheless, the Nordic suffered
more than any one else. The Nordic is essentially a high-standard
man. He requires healthful living conditions, and pines
when deprived of good food, fresh air, and exercise. So
long as Europe was mainly agricultural the Nordic usually
got these things. In fact, in cool Northern

[page 21]

and Central Europe an agricultural environment
actually favored the big blond Nordic as against the slighter,
less muscular Mediterranean, while in the hotter south the
Nordic upper class, being the rulers, were protected from
field labor and thus survived as an aristocracy. Under modern
conditions, however, the crowded city and the cramped factory
weed out the Nordic much faster than they do the Alpine
or the Mediterranean, both of which stocks seem to be able
to stand such an environment with less damage to themselves.
It is needless to add that the late war and its aftermath
have been terrible blows to the Nordic race.This
rapid decline of the Nordic stock in Europe is a very serious
matter. The Nordic's great energy, political ability, and
high level of intelligence are vital to Europe's prosperity
and progress. The peculiar qualities of the Nordic intellect
are just the ones which today would be most missed. One
of the Nordic's most valuable traits is his adventurous
curiosity. This makes him preeminent not only as a pioneer
and explorer but also as an inventor and scientific investigator.
The Mediterranean probably excels the Nordic in music and
the fine arts. But in the intellectual fields the Nordic
excels the Mediterranean and vastly outstrips the Alpine.
Our modern scientific age is mainly a product of Nordic
genius. Deprived of that genius, it would rapidly decline.
It therefore seems as though those nations which possess
most Nordic blood will tend to be the most progressive as
well as the most energetic and politically able. Important
assets, these, for the future! Let us now take a brief survey
of the present racial

[page 22]

make-up of the European nations, based upon
the latest scientific estimates that have been made. Our
survey will shatter many old notions that used to prevail
when race was confused with matters like language and culture.
For example, it used to be thought that France, Italy, and
Spain were all members of a Latin race. We now know that
there never was any such race and that these three nations
differ widely in racial make-up...

I
provide additional discussion of Dr. Lothrop Stoddard and
his works in my "Libertarianism
vs. Nationalism" web page. For more of Stoddard's
Racial Realities in Europe carried at America First
Books, the following is a table of contents:

"Group
property," is a very common mode of ownership in the
U.S. across all levels of society, but that does not necessarily
mean that Americans who engage in it are "communists,"
"socialists," or "collectivists." Various
forms of "group property" include government property
holdings in military assets and national parks, "commons"
areas jointly owned by condominium owners, and indivisible
claims on corporate assets owned by common stock holders.
A
disadvantage of the "group property" mode of ownership
is often called the "tragedy of the commons" in
academic literature, where selfish individuals have an incentive
to overhunt or overgraze for themselves the use of a scare
resource at the long term expense of everyone else. "Group
property" also tends to reduce a long term sense of stakeholdership
that give people an incentive to invest themselves into making
property improvements. A
famous example from American history is the first Virginia
colony at Jamestown, that initially insisted on group ownership
of just about everything, except wives. The incentive to work
became so poor that Capt. John Smith had to admonish "If
you don't work, you don't eat." Later, as Dr. Murray
Rothbard observes in Conceived in Liberty, things
turned around dramatically when settlers were given private
property incentives. That solution was particularly appropriate
for a frontier situation where arable land for the taking
seemed unlimited. A
disadvantage of the private ownership mode is that it cuts
off open public access to ones own property. While this may
increase incentives for owners to make improvements on their
own property, it may also reduce forms of opportunity and
meritocracy for everyone else. Private property regimes may
also make it easier for too much control to wind up in the
hands of undesirable people who seek to plunder society rather
than support the long term public welfare.I
was a real estate broker for ten years, and used to make my
living by analyzing and negotiating all the various rights
included within specific properties. After all, a real estate
property is nothing more than a "bundle or rights."
As usual, it pays to "do your homework" and "look
under the hood" and "kick the tires," because
the particular rights that come bundled with particular properties
can be very different. For some real estate properties, the
legal owners have so many encumbrances on their effective
rights that the "private property ownership" mode
can be more trouble than it is worth. This can include the
right of the state to impose onerous taxes on ones property,
its enforcement of zoning ordnances that prohibit one from
making desired improvements, and its ability to grant public
easements or exercise "eminent domain" in ways that
wreck ones ability to achieve "quiet enjoyment."
Once
someone examines the various pros and cons of different types
of property ownership for different situations, I think they
will arrive at the same conclusion that I have, namely that
there is no form of property ownership --whether "group"
or "individual" -- that has all the answers for
all situations.Last,
but not least, there is usually a deep sociological and political
dimension behind modes of property ownership that one also
needs to look at. Quite often it is "more the men who
make the system than the system that make the men." Both
modes of group or individual property ownership have been
used by psychopaths, predators, or parasites throughout history
to ruthlessly exploit society. Sometimes "group property"
regimes actually operate behind the scenes more like "private
property" regimes and vice versa. It is often too simplistic
to compare "private property" and "group property"
as stand-alone intellectual constructs. You also need to examine
the political agendas of various groups in society competing
for power who are trying to manipulate these things. For
example, in many communist countries, the leaders who run
the top bureaucracies, military, and secret police typically
enjoy more de facto rights and privileges over "group
property" than their counterpart elites typically enjoy
in "private property" countries. A
big problem with any "group property" regime is
that there is usually always someone who acts an "overseer"
over a particular group property system. That person, whether
he is a government bureaucrat, national park director, communist
party hack, city official, or a military officer, can be every
bit as corrupt or abusive as a private property owner.All
considered, since I am fearful that "absolute power corrupts
absolutely," and because I also prefer private incentive
systems, I tend to be biased towards decentralized forms of
property control as the least bad option, which means I tend
to be biased in the direction of private property systems
compared to the group property approach. For Nordic peoples
like the Icelanders, I can also argue that it has the advantage
of being more "natural" and consistent with their
own peculiar longstanding evolutionary patterns. However,
I would not advocate automatically trying to apply the Icelandic
approach to property ownership to other societies around the
world with very different cultural and evolutionary experiences
and social problems to deal with.

Appendix
III

Bernie
Madoff:
A Recent Financial World Poster Boy of High Level Jewish Evil

Former
NASDAQ chairman Bernie Madoff is so totally psychopathic that
he even bilked his own Jewish co-tribalist Elie Wiesel for
millions, not to mention the Teamsters Union and NY Mets (see
victim list here,
PDF format). The total take of his thievery is estimated at
$50 billion. The article "Elie
Wiesel says he can't forgive Bernie Madoff,"
CNN.com, February 27, 2009 indirectly comments on the kick
in the groin that was also given to Iceland:

NEW
YORK (CNN) -- Elie Wiesel, the Nazi concentration camp survivor
who went on to win the Nobel Peace Prize, showed little
inclination this week to make peace with accused swindler
Bernie Madoff, whom he called "one of the greatest
scoundrels, thieves, liars, criminals.""Could
I forgive him? No," the 80-year-old told a panel assembled
Thursday by Conde Nast's Portfolio Magazine at New York's
21 Club to discuss Madoff, whose alleged victims included
Wiesel and his foundation, The Elie Wiesel Foundation for
Humanity."To
forgive, first of all, would mean that he would come on
his knees and ask for forgiveness," the Auschwitz survivor
said. "He wouldn't do that."Madoff,
70, is accused of running a Ponzi scheme that may have cost
investors up to $50 billion. He faces one charge of securities
fraud in connection with an international scheme that has
cost some investors their life savings and could land him
in prison for up to 20 years.Wiesel
said a wealthy friend who has known Madoff for 50 years
introduced them. The two men met twice over dinner, and
Wiesel checked with financial experts whom he trusted before
investing all of his and his wife's personal money.Then,
once Madoff had gained his trust, Wiesel invested all $15.2
million that his foundation had amassed, he said."We
thought he was God, we trusted everything in his hands,"
the Boston University humanities professor said.Wiesel
put his friend's loss at $50 million.Wiesel
rejected the suggestion that "affinity fraud,"
the tendency for people to trust others of similar background,
played any role in leaving him vulnerable to Madoff. Both
men are Jewish."It's
not the Jewishness in him, it's the inhumanity in this man
who simply believed he can go around depriving people of
their livelihoods. What he has done to certain people, it
breaks my heart," he said."At
the end, he went down to swindle thousands and thousands
of people, and hurt thousands and thousands of people. Take
our little foundation. My wife takes care of 1,000 Ethiopian
children in Israel. What he does to them -- we were going
to open a third center in Jerusalem. We cannot do it now.
What [he has] done to others, to hospitals, to educational
institutions, my God! Didn't he think?"

It
is quite possible that Weisel and other co-tribesman will
eventually get reimbursed by either Israel or the U.S. Government.
In addition, as the American Jewish author Jack Bernstein
observed in his classic work "Life of An American Jew
in Racist, Marxist Israel," Israel is one of the most
racist countries on the planet, where even white American
Jews who immigrate to Israeli may still not be "Jewish
enough" to marry certain elite Jews who can prove no
goy blood going back for eternity. It is quite possible
that both Wiesel and the Israeli government work with the
Ethiopian children for purely cosmetic "controlled opposition"
reasons, giving them a pretext to stand up and wave their
arms and shout "Who says we are racists?" Meanwhile,
Israelis continue to routinely torture and murder thousands
of Palestinians. Wiesel and the Israeli government are probably
secretly glad that they now have a pretext to no longer insert
more colored kids into Jerusalem. Iceland
suffers from a form of naïveté that afflicts Nordic
peoples everywhere. They tend to project their own characteristics
on to others. They assume that because they feel like being
rational, fair, and honest, that all other peoples are the
same way. Most Nordic people have absolutely no concept of
the depth of crookedness, intrigue, and depravity of Jews
like Bernie Madoff, Mossad-CIA, or Jewish society in general.
They usually do not understand these things until it is too
late, after these people have been allowed to infiltrate Nordic
society, take control, and do their damage. The
following are some sample Madsen reports that give us the
sense that the Icelandic banking crisis could simply be re-titled
"Madoff and Mossad Come to Iceland:"

January
12, 2009 -- Is Madoff the tip of a money laundering pyramid
in Israel?The
U.S. District court for the Southern District of New York
seems intent on keeping ex-NASDAQ chairman and $50 billion
Ponzi scheme swindler Bernard Madoff confined to his Upper
East Side Manhattan luxury home and not in a federal lock-up.
Two judges in the New York federal circuit, Theodore Katz
and Ronald Ellis, have ruled that Madoff should stay in
his town house and out of prison.Attorney
General Michael Mukasey, whose son Marc Mukasey of the law
firm Bracewell & Giuliani represents Frank DiPascali,
one of the Madoff cronies, once served on the federal bench
with Katz and Ellis in New York. Katz was appointed by George
H. W. Bush while Ellis, an African American, was appointed
by Clinton.WMR
previously reported that Madoff is suspected of transferring
much of his ill-gotten gain to Israeli banks, including
one, Bank Leumi, that Madoff associate J. Ezra Merkin bought
from the Israeli government when Ariel Sharon was Prime
Minister and current Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was Finance
Minister.Almost
forgotten in the Madoff scandal is another scandal in which
Morris "Moshe" Talansky, a New York businessman,
admitted that he gave Olmert $150,000 in cash contained
in envelopes. The scandal forced Olmert to announce that
he was stepping down as Prime Minister but not before he
launched a genocidal attack on Gaza.Las
Vegas billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who is a major donor
to the Republican Party, has also given generously to Likud
chief and Prime Minister-hopeful Binyamin Netanyahu, who
hopes to succeed Olmert as Prime Minister.Madoff,
Talansky, Merkin, Olmert, Netanyahu, Adelson, one-time top
GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his associate Adam Kidan,
Rahm Emanuel, and all their comrades in Washington, Tel
Aviv, Jerusalem, London, Ottawa, and Paris brings to mind
the Hebrew saying "ba'al ha'mea ba'al ha'dea"
or "the one with the money calls the shots" or
even more telling, "he who has the gold makes the rules."

February
10, 2009 -- Who's behind Madoff?...One
of the investors in Madoff's scam was, according to the
published list of Madoff "victims," was the Bank
of New York (BONY) and a contrivance called the "Alternate
Investment Service." BONY was the subject of a previous
detailed WMR report on the activities of the Russian-Israeli
mob:

"Forest Hills has been identified
by the FBI as a major center for both the Russian-Israeli
Mafia and Mossad and it is a place where the two interests
often cooperate. In 2002, OPERATION SPIDERWEB, a joint
FBI-EUROPOL operation, resulted in the arrest of 20 Russian-Israeli
dual citizens on charges of money laundering. The laundering
primarily involved the Bank of New York (BONY), the Russian
bank Menatep, and an 'Internet bank' called the European
Union Bank. More importantly, the money laundering network
also included Benex, a firm connected to Bill Clinton-pardoned
Mossad figure Marc Rich, who still resides primarily in
Switzerland. ... Benex's office was located on Queens
Boulevard in Forest Hills in the same building where Grigori
Loutchanskyheadquartered two of his companies. Loutchansky
is a Latvian-born Israeli who laundered billions through
his Vienna-based NORDEX firm. National Security Agency
(NSA) signals intercepts have reportedly yielded intelligence
on Loutchansky's role in the smuggling of nuclear materials.
Loutchansky also was closely linked to Clinton's 1996
re-election campaign through New York real estate magnate
and Democratic donor Sam Dombs. ... Forest Hills was also
the hometown of international diamond dealer Yehuda Abraham,
convicted in a plot to smuggle surface-to-air missile
launchers from Russia into the United States, mere four
months after 9/11, and launder the proceeds from the deal
through Malaysia. The network was discovered to have links
with the Viktor Bout weapons smuggling network and money
laundering facilities linked to 'Al Qaeda' Southeast Asia
affiliate Jemaah Islamiyah. Abraham, an Afghan Jew, was
linked not only to Mossad but to the Saudi Royal Family."

...WMR
has learned from a U.S. intelligence source in the Middle
East that much of the $50 billion scammed by Madoff is now
in Israeli banks and other financial contrivances established
to secretly launder the ill-gotten loot. The Madoff Ponzi
scheme may also be linked to the revelations by former Liechtenstein
LGT bank employee Heinrich Kieber of secret off-shore accounts
held by tax-evading politicians and businessmen in the United
States and other countries, as well as the Clearstream entity
in Luxembourg that involved allegations of a slush fund
used to finance the political ambitions of France's neocon
president, Nicolas Sarkozy, and other right-wing politicians.Harry
Markopolos, a former investment manager-turned-investigator,
recently told the U. S. House Financial Services Subcommittee
that the SEC failed to take action against Madoff when Markopolos
repeatedly warned the regulatory agency of the Ponzi scheme
activities of Madoff, a former chairman of NASDAQ. The hearing
at which Markopolos testified was chaired by Rep. Gary Ackerman
(D-NY), whose 5th congressional district adjoins the 9th
congressional district of Forest Hills and Rego Park, a
nexus for Russian-Israeli mob activity in the New York City
area...

March
13, 2009 -- BULLETIN. SPECIAL REPORT. No conspiracy charge
by feds against Madoff is covering up links to domestic
and foreign intelligence...WMR
spoke to a former close aide to Madoff who related how he
handled a number of transactions personally for Madoff.
The source said that Madoff was running a special type of
"pump and dump" scheme. The source said that Madoff
would "pump money out of the system and dump it out
to another place." When asked what that "other
place" was, the source replied, "Israel."The
source believes that no conspiracy charges were brought
by the federal government against Madoff because it is the
government and not necessarily Madoff that is trying to
protect his "network and superiors."...The
source said..."Bernie was operating a "pump and
dump" scheme for a domestic and foreign intelligence
agency." Asked to name the domestic agency, the source
replied, "CIA." Asked about the foreign agency,
the source claimed it was "the Russia-Israeli mob operating
with Mossad."

All
of this underscores an important point I make in my discussion
of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopatholgy in my mutualism
vs. parasitism article, namely that the great Achilles
Heel of the Jewish people is that their whole culture is so
heavily geared towards guile and collectivism that they lack
adequate checks and balances to prevent the worst psychopaths
from rising to the top. In
fact, this is the point made by Rabbi Lewis Browne in his
classic work Stranger Than Fiction written around
1924, namely that Jews have always been plagued throughout
their very long and sad history by false messiahs who rise
to the top and then lead fellow Jews to a bad end. In
contrast, with their strong traits of individualism, rationalism,
and other libertarian tendencies, the Nordic peoples have
historically ranked among the the least likely to let false
prophets and would-be tyrants get out of control. This incorporates
the fact that Germany stopped being a majority Nordic country
in the 17th century, as noted by Lothrop Stoddard in Appendix
I above, and therefore Adolf Hitler's "Fuhrer Dictatorship"
had more in common with the imperial Roman Empire that Hermann
the Cherusci fought against in 9 A.D. (mentioned earlier)
than with the indigenous folkways of his own Nordic tribe.

Appendix
IV

An
overview of the topic areas: "American
History and Genuine Nationalism, Tribalism and Nationalism,
Nationalist Axioms and Decision Rules, and Nationalism and
the Ideological Spectrum:"

Nationalism
Background

Americans
started off on a weak footing. In The End of Kings:
A History of Republics and Republicans, William Everdell
observes that the whole right hand side of the British political
spectrum was missing in the colonies at the time of the
American Revolution. In Albion's
Seed, by David Hackett Fischer, we learn about
how America already pushed the envelop of "ethnic diversity"
during this era. The publisher summary states:

This
cultural history explains the European settlement of the
United States as voluntary migrations from four English
cultural centers. Families of zealous, literate Puritan
yeomen and artisans from urbanized East Anglia established
a religious community in Massachusetts (1629-40); royalist
cavaliers headed by Sir William Berkeley and young, male
indentured servants from the south and west of England built
a highly stratified agrarian way of life in Virginia (1640-70);
egalitarian Quakers of modest social standing from the North
Midlands resettled in the Delaware Valley and promoted a
social pluralism (1675-1715); and, in by far the largest
migration (1717-75), poor borderland families of English,
Scots, and Irish fled a violent environment to seek a better
life in a similarly uncertain American backcountry.

There
were also German Lutherans in Pennsylvania, Dutch in New
York, religious refugees, political dissenters, Catholics,
and underclasses of indentured servants, criminals, and
black slaves and black freed men. Most of these groups had
experienced serious problems getting along with each other
over the centuries back in the Old Country. The
closest that America has ever come to what I consider "genuine
nationalism" on an ideological level took place at
the colony or state level prior to the American Revolution.
Certain colonies came very close to exercising full sovereignty
rights, to include the power to independently make war,
issue their own money, and control the flow of people and
goods across their borders. Up until the French and Indian
War, the British government was typically "out of sight,
out of mind." There was also strong ethnic rootedness
within each colony. For example, according to Dr. Ralph
Raico at mises.org, most of the population increase from
1700 to 1776 came from several generations of large families
in America and not immigration. The Cousin's Wars
by Kevin Philips describes how most New Englanders could
trace an ancestor who fought for Parliament during the English
Civil War. I
view the steady growth of the federal government since the
1770's as generally trending Americans in the philosophical
direction of Zionist-friendly, pro-imperial New World Order
values that go against "genuine nationalism."
This is because in the long run, imperialism, like internationalism,
is the enemy of nationalism. Imperialism by definition means
stitching together different "natural countries"
or "nationalisms" by force to create an empire.
(In contrast, a voluntary group of independent nations is
called a "Confederation," "Commonwealth,"
"League," or "Compact of States" but
certainly not an "Empire.") To prevent secession,
empires typically wage various forms of overt or covert
war against manisfestations of "nationalism" in
the provinces. The
willingness of the Federal government to act increasingly
"imperialist" towards its member states was indicated
by such flash points as the "Kentucky
Resolutions" crisis of 1798, the Hartford
Convention of 1814-1815, and the South
Carolina nullification crisis of 1832-1833. It was also
indicated by the increasingly anti-States Rights Supreme
court decisions starting with the John Marshall Court, as
discussed in Dr. Kevin Gutzman's Politically Incorrect
Guide to the U.S. Constitution.The
lid on the genuine American nationalist coffin was slammed
shut for good during the War Against Southern Independence,
which physically smashed States Rights for Southern States.
The final nails in the coffin came with the creation of
the Federal Reserve banking System and income tax in 1913,
according to lectures by Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo at Mises.org.
America had effectively become a globalist, internationalist,
super power riding horse ripe to get hijacked by Zionists.
The first great hijacking of foreign policy took place when
American Jews brought America into WWI on the side of Britain
in exchange for the Balfour Declaration promise by the British
government that it would open up Palestine, which it did
not yet possess at the time of its promise, to mass Jewish
immigration. What
makes a discussion of American nationalism even more complicated
is the fact that beginning in 1861, the U.S. Government
became a de facto "neo-Jacobin" imperial establishment
that had more in common with the government of Napoleon
Bonaparte than Thomas Jefferson. "Neo-jacobinism"
means a "centralizing" federal central government
that enforces liberal-egalitarian ideals top-down, whereas
Thomas Jefferson believed in "true federalism,"
where populist values are exerted from the grass roots,
and the states must always be stronger than the central
government to keep it in check. Rather than clarify this
issue, most Washington D.C. politicians since 1861 have
made their living shamelessly using the libertarian rhetoric
of Jefferson to deceive their constituents, while backstage
feeding at the trough of big government in every way possible.
Adding
even more to the confusion, a number of Mises Institute
lecturers use the term "nationalist" to describe
the polices of Henry Clay and his so-called "American
system" that advocated aggressive use of protectionist
policies in the 19th century to provide more revenues for
the federal government. In my view, the real "nation"
in America history existed mainly on a state level that
once formed the original united States of America (note
use the small "u" in "united," as in
the original Declaration
of Independence), whereas in their view, the "nation"
consists of a collection of vassal states directed by the
Federal government of the United States.There
is yet another major area of confusion I need to address.
An important motivation for the American War of Independence
was a desire by colonists to lift the prohibition by the
English government against westward expansion across the
Appalachian Continental divide. Prior to the Revolution,
George Washington was a major land speculator in this forbidden
territory, as was Daniel Boone and many other American heroes.
The Battle of the Great Kanawha (or Pleasant Point), was
fought in 1774 near thousands of acres owned by George Washington.
This took place where the Kanawha River of West Virginia
meets the Ohio River. About a thousand American militia
from Virginia defeated an equal number of Indians in a struggle
for control of the Ohio Valley. Many historians view this
as the first real battle of the American Revolution. In
The Winning of the West, Teddy Roosevelt called
it a huge inspiration for the War of Independence, because
it showed colonists how they could go man-to-man with the
Indians and win without British assistance. Common Sense
by Tom Paine, which played in important role in igniting
the American spirit of independence, specifically explains
how Americans could gain access to the natural resources
of an entire Continent that would make them a great power
in their own right.An
important reason why the Articles of Confederation got scrapped
in favor of the U.S. Constitution in 1787 was to create
a more centralized federal government that could more easily
fund a federal army to conquer and consolidate Indian tribes
that stood in the way of Western expansion. America leaders
also wanted to preempt the British, Spanish, French, and
Russian empires in grabbing land all the way out to the
Pacific. Last,
but not least, the "dual sovereignty" nature of
the the original U.S. Constitution is a tremendous source
of confusion in any discussion of "genuine nationalism."
On
the one hand, the U.S. Constitution expresses the principle
of state sovereignty, that is, States Rights and "true
federalism" through the original selection of Senators
from state legislatures to the U.S. Senate, like appointing
ambassadors to a foreign country or to a supranational organization
like NATO or the UN. On
the other hand, the U.S. Constitution also affirms federal
sovereignty over the people, or "federal supremacy,"
though the direct election of representatives to the U.S.
House of Representatives. When people elect representatives
directly to a governing body, this implies that they fall
directly under its own sovereign jurisdiction. In contrast,
when they want to express independence from a governing
body, they typically have their elected representatives
walk out and instead send ambassadors as representatives.
As an example, following the American Revolution, it would
have been unthinkable for Americans to hold popular elections
to elect representatives to go to London and participate
as voting members of the House of Commons, since America
was now an independent nation. In 1861, it became unthinkable
for any of the Confederate States to continue sending Congressmen
to Washington, D.C.Rapid
westward ultimately tipped the balance of power into the
hands of "federal supremacism" and away from the
states. The expansion opened up the floodgates of European
immigration from many different nationalities in order to
rapidly populate the new territories, drive up real estate
values, and fend off European imperial powers. At the same
time, all traditional forms of European nationalism that
involve an identification with a specific tribal culture
oriented towards an indigenous culture, religion, ethnic
group, and land base generally went flying out the window,
as American pioneers intermarried with people of other European
ethnicities and hopped from land holding to land holding
as they moved further West. America became like a hot growth
company that is more focused on making quick mergers and
acquisitions to keep its growth story going and its stock
price climbing than building a coherent corporate culture
or creating standardized internal systems. The urge for
these things usually comes later once markets mature, the
hot growth stops, and the company now has to undergo a "shakeout"
to improve efficiency in the face of greater competition.
America
was a "dual rhetoric" nation during the hot growth
period leading up to the War Against Southern Independence
(1861-1865). On the one hand it preached the libertarian
ideals of the limited republic that had evolved from relatively
stable colonial conditions east of the Appalachians. Americans
leaders preached states rights and warned about federal
power and imperial foreign entanglements. They also expressed
concern about the long term danger to civil liberties created
by standing armies. On
the other hand, the fast Westward expansion created a de
facto imperial government. The U.S. maintained a large professional
army to conquer and hold down Indian territories. Immigrants
to lands west of the Appalachians increasingly looked to
the federal government as their protector rather than their
state governments. The
multi-ethnic, fast-conquest, politically centralized American
social model became very similar to that of imperial Rome.
Ancient Rome once made citizens of a wide variety of former
nationalities and ethnic groups. At various times, as many
as half the soldiers in the Roman imperial army were former
German and Celtic tribesmen. When Americans burst over the
Appalachians beginning in the 1770's, they also began a
metaphorical journey from the social structure and demographics
of medieval libertarian Iceland to that of ancient imperial
Rome. To
gain another important historical perspective, books like
The End of Kings: A History of Republics and Republicans
by William Everdell help show us how republics tend to go
through historical life cycles. Initially, republican forms
of government tend to be formed to solve the problem of
tyranny, that is, how to replace rulers who prove themselves
corrupt, vicious, or incompetent without going through a
bloody overthrow, and on top of this, how to instill more
"rational process," "transparency" (honesty),
and predictability (preservation of private property rights)
in a governing body. As
time goes by, various political factions often try to enfranchise
more people either to outflank their opposition, build their
power base, or buy the loyalty of new subjects as a successful
republic expands it territorial bounds to incorporate new
lands and peoples (the story of the Roman Republic, various
Grecian city states, and British Commonwealth). However,
as more people become enfranchised, the quality of the overall
electorate tends to become more vulgar, dumbed-down, petty,
and selfish. Over time, the politics of "rational process"
that characterized the early phase of the republic gets
replaced with the "politics of envy." In this
increasingly vulgar environment, more psychopaths float
to the top, and increase their "nesting" in top
governmental positions, bringing with them the "politics
of special privilege." All this in turn leads to escalating
politics of "pork barrel" and "wealth redistribution."
Eventually republics tend to collapse under the weight of
massive corruption at the top, overbearing taxation and
regulation, as well as increased incompetence, reduced vigilance,
and general laziness among the general electorate. While
the "limited republic" created by American Revolutionaries
was seriously "at risk" up until 1861, Abraham
Lincoln's War slammed the iron door on it for good. The
doctrine of States Rights was, the only effective deterrent
against unlimited federal power growth (as noted by Thomas
Jefferson and James Madison in their Virginia and Kentucky
Resolutions of 1798). All white racial and ethnic roots
to nationalism were also effectively turned on their head
during the Reconstruction Era when in many Southern states
whites were no longer allowed to vote, and their legislatures
were run by illiterate former Negro slaves. A totally psychopathic
Jewish carpetbagger even served as South Carolina's governor
(See "Franklin
J. Moses, Reconstruction's Most Infamous Scalawag"
by Michael Collins Piper). As
the final coup de grace, millions of Jews flooded into New
York City in the late 1800's, who proceeded to gobble up
control of major media and set up the central bank in 1913.
Viewing this from the perspective of a predator vs. counter
predator ecological model, America's declining WASP majority
had already become badly brainwashed by neo-Jacobin ideology
and badly fragmented by "melting pot" policies.
It had already been heavily penetrated by the rise of CAtholic
political machines in the big cities, and the enfranchisement
of former Negro slaves. The WASP "immune system"
was now so heavily degraded that it effectively lacked the
capability to arrest the long decline of the Nordic percentage
of the white population that began in the mid-19th century.
It
was now full throttle on the "politics of envy"
and the "politics of special privilege." America
was headed towards the completely Orwellian, neo-Jacobin
scientific dictatorship, where Americans are told they are
free, but in reality they have become serfs and slaves,
and Americans ostensibly fight for "democracy"
in Iraq and Iran while the Nordic demographic decline accelerates
stateside, paralleled by the equally alarming decline of
the white middle class in general. America continues to
transition into the perfect police state at home, complete
with vote-fraud elections. The Jewish "contribution"
to America has been to push Americans even further away
from their northern European libertarian roots, well beyond
their de facto imperial Roman social model, and now into
a police state control grid and propaganda matrix that is
arguably even worse than all the ills associated with ancient
Babylon. By
the late Robber Baron Age, America was effectively ruled
by a ghastly marriage of "Predator," that is,
de facto Robber Barons and carpetbaggers who support unlimited
federal government, and "Alien," that is, Zionists
who employ evil Jewish genius at deception to keep the masses
perpetually bamboozled while serving Jewish interests at
their own expenses. Please see my Preface
to Book III of my Trilogy for more on "Predator
vs. Alien."All
this is bad enough for Americans living in America, but
it got even worse for the entire planet in the 20th century
when America became a springboard for Jewish intrigues to
spread Jewish Marxism around the planet. As an example,
Jacob Schiff, the Jewish plutocrat based in New York City,
played a key role in financing the Bolshevik Revolution,
to include sponsoring the steamer trip by Leon Trotsky,
father of the Red Terror, and several hundred Jewish revolutionaries
from New York City to Russia in 1917. American Jews surrounding
Woodrow Wilson played a key role in dragging America into
WWI as part of the Jewish Balfour Deal, which prolonged
the war, and so weakened Europe that America wound up setting
the stage for the rise of Fascism, Nazism, and Bolshevism.
American Jews and close Jewish allies ranging from Armand
Hammer to David Rockefeller played also played key role
in keeping the Soviet Union alive. (See The Money Masters
video embedded in Chapter
33). Americans
smashed Germany twice in the 20th century, once regarded
as a traditional bulwark of Western Civilization in Europe.
More recently, America bombed Serbia for its nationalist
policies. Certain American leaders have openly declared
European nationalism an ideological enemy, and have even
openly supported massive non-European immigration into Europe.
In
many respects, Iceland's destabilization comes from living
under the shadow of neo-Jacobin, Zionist-dominated America
and Britain, much like the way former Canadian Minister
Pierre Elliot Trudeau once complained about having to share
a bed with the American "elephant." Many
traditional American conservatives also complain about having
the Zionist "elephant" in their own living room
that no one dares notice.

"Double Trouble Elephants:" The Zionist
elephant "up-elephants" even the American elephant

Today,
America under the Zionist neo-cons is knocking itself out overrunning
Muslim lands in Central Asia like it is running some kind of
Wild West Indian campaign. Worse yet, ethnically mixed, "melting
pot" Americans transfer their tribal instincts to create
some kind of "tribal daddy" out of the U.S. Government,
even though it is manipulated behind the scenes by neo-Jacobin
psychopaths and Zionist lunatics. Rather than feel a healthy
and natural sense of authentic European folk tribalism, most
brainwashed white Americans surrender their loyalties to the
control of "Alien" and "Predator" just like
the perverse manner in which baby monkeys learn to obtain "contact
comfort" from chicken wire and terry cloth "mothers"
rather than real mothers in psychological experimentation laboratories.
In
summary, while American "nationalism" is a very strange
ideological animal by traditional European standards, there
are still some healthy tribal instincts left inside even the
most brainwashed white Americans that will never completely
go away. America may be down, but it is not totally out. In
fact, I believe that America's anti-nationalist leaders are
pushing on a spring, and that some day nationalism will come
roaring back in North America just like it did after the fall
of communism in the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia.
I provide additional comments on this topic in the Publisher's
Preface that I wrote to the 2007 ebook edition of Civil
War Two: The Coming Breakup of America by Thomas W. Chittum.In
my view, nationalism is essentially an effort to incorporate
as many aspects of tribalism as possible into the modern nation-state.
The word "nation" comes from the Latin word "nacio"
or birth. Historically, a tribe is like a collection of extended
families, all related by common heredity and culture.Many
nationalists tend to view the tribe as the most stable and desirable
foundation for the political unit we call a "nation"
or "state." They also tend to view competition between
tribes as a a natural and inevitable aspect of the human condition.
As the British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith observed in A
New Theory of Evolution, the tribe has been the most basic
social unit among most peoples throughout most history and evolution.
Dr. Norman Hall, author of the landmark article "Zoological
Subspecies In Man," suggested that tribalism has an instinctive
or genetic component in human behavior.Nationalists
tend to view the racial and ethnic homogeneity that tends to
go with tribalism as a strength. They also accept chivalrous
competition between tribal groups as a positive force for evolutionary
development, analogous to the way small business competition
fosters innovation and better products. A
corollary to this line of reasoning is the idea that when a
stable tribal group tries to incorporate alien peoples into
a larger political entity and wield them together by force,
it acquires "risk factors" and sources of instability.
On the one hand this empire building process may enable the
leaders of the core tribal group to acquire direct control of
more land and resources, but on the other hand the attempt to
stitch together disparate peoples also creates more sources
of internal friction and instability. If the alien peoples are
more lazy and stupid,they may dilute the quality of the overall
population. If the alien peoples are better at mafia tactics,
they may eventually usurp ones own government. America's
globalist-internationalist regime today views tribal competition
as a source of divisiveness, war, and unnecessary social friction,
except when it comes to Zionism. They ignore how Third World
illegal immigrants have reduced the overall productivity level
of the formerly 90% white population, except when it comes to
Israeli immigration policy that excludes non-Jews. One
suspects that deep down inside, Zionists do not object to tribalism,
because they are among the greatest tribalists on the planet.
One suspects that what they really do not want is any tribal
competition. If
I were approaching the topic of "nationalism" from
the viewpoint of an artificial intelligence computer programmer,
my "decision logic" might look like the following:

Important axioms:

As ethnic-genetic distance increases between tribal groups,
the chances that one will act like a predator or parasite
towards the other increases. As ethnic-genetic distances
decreases, the chances of mutualistic and altruistic behavior
increases.

Societies become increasingly unstable and likely to fission
apart as a dominant ethnic group falls below 75%. Stable
societies require that one cohesive ethnic group retain
at least a 90% demographic presence and control of strategic
bases.

Tribalism reflects an innate social instinct and a form
of group altruism. It is as healthy, natural and desirable
form of social competition, and will never be eradicated.
Wise statesmen try to work with it rather than ruthlessly
suppress it.

An important clue for the kind of society that reflects
the most stable, healthy, and natural social environment
is what has existed for hundreds of years. This is analogous
to the way in which unpackaged, unprocessed, natural foods
tend to be much more healthy than that highly refined foods
with chemical additives. Similarly, when Panda bears stop
mating in zoos, the first thing that zoologists try to do
is recreate their natural environment as much as possible,
which might include creating more space and bamboo groves.
Similarly, Nordic peoples have spent most of their evolutionary
history in homogeneous small fishing villages and family
farms, that is a strong indication a multi-racial, multi-cultural
society run by an alien people like Zionists could be very
unnatural and toxic for them.

(a) Maximize the revitalization,
enhancement, and maintenance of indigenous culture and religion
to maximize tribal solidarity and cohesion
(b) Maximize "charity begins at home" or in-group
reinvestment of instinctive altruism within ones tribal group.
.
(c) Maximize tribal control of strategic bases, minimize alien
control
(d) Maximize the tribal basis of the modern nation-state.
View expansionism beyond ones own tribal base as risking the
accumulation of potentially destabilizing factors.
(e) Minimize ethnic-genetic distance in the process of building
core economic, political, and social alliances. Start with
minimal ethnic genetic-distance first and build outward from
there.
(f) Maximize economic and political self-sufficiency. Minimize
dependency on alien groups.
(g) If thrust into an imperial policy (using coercion to hold
together other tribes and "nationalisms") minimize
anti-tribalism to reduce risk of retaliation.
(h) If submerged within an empire, form a nation within a
nation as much as possible, with an eye towards eventual secession
and restoration of full sovereignty rights when appropriate
conditions emerge.

Given
this background on the topics of tribalism and nationalism,
and genuine nationalism and American history, let us now consider
how "nationalism" fits into the "genetic"
side of the ideological spectrum:

Environmental
(leftist)

Genetic
(rightist)

"Y"
axis

Central-
ized
(more
top
down)

"x" axis

Environmental
Centralized
Neo-Jacobinism, "Modern Liberalism," "Liberal
Fascism"
The U.S. Government today
Part of Friedman,
Gissurarson and
Oddsson "neo-con" Ideology

Anarcho-libertarian
philosophies in the lower left hand quarter are usually obsessed
with eliminating any restrictions that stand in the way of maximizing
short term business growth and profiteering . They take the
view that humans are infinitely programmable blank slates (environmentalism)
and dismiss genetic differences that can give rise to predatory
or parasitic behavior by foreign groups. They usually do not
care about flooding ones own country with the cheap labor of
alien peoples who may some day get the vote and then sweep their
own people out of office and impose alien values. They are willing
to make quick bucks by outsourcing strategic industries, even
if this costs them the manufacturing and agricultural independence
over the long run required to defend against unexpected enemies.
In
contrast, nationalists are much more concerned about retaining
control of the strategic bases of their society such as government,
leading corporations, media, and the military. They also tend
to value intangibles such as shared language, culture, and ethnicity
that help people circle the wagons against unexpected predators
and parasites. Lastly, they are more finicky about distinguishing
potential "enemies" from "friendlies" in
advance to avoid getting ambushed by them.In
Chapter
6 of my Trilogy I explain how all these elements
must pull together:

The
elements that political leaders must pull together in order
to achieve sovereignty on a national level are analogous to
the McKinsey “7-S” factors for small company success
detailed in the bestseller In
Search of Excellence by Peters and Waterman. They
involve a combination of intangible as well as tangible elements
that must reinforce each other in order for a group to function
effectively in a competitive world.

Components
of the famous “McKinsey 7-S” paradigm; and
a comparison of corporate and nationalist applications

·Strategy:Game plan for building a competitive advantage
over competitors.Nationalist
version:Coordination
of foreign and domestic policy to optimize economic growth,
military strength, citizen prosperity, and national self-sufficiency.

·Structure:Degree of centralization vs. decentralization
in management hierarchy, importance of staff vs. line
officers Nationalist version:Degree of government size and intervention
in economy compared to the size of entrepreneurial infrastructure
and private ownership.

·Systems:Standard operating procedures, incentive
systems, and the use of data processing automationNationalist
version:Political, business, military academic processes
for selecting and promoting talent and systematically
handling operations

·Shared Values:"Superordinate goals" that
transcend immediate profit-loss concerns and provide unifying
long term vision and long term loyalty Nationalist
version: Interplay of shared religion, culture, heritage,
and ethnic-genetic interests that promote patriotic sentiment.

·Staff: Special problem-solving capabilities and
degree of leadership depth provided by broader management
team Nationalist
version:Various form of institutionalized excellence,
degree of globally competitive brain trust

·Skills: the actual skills and competencies of the
employees working for the company. Nationalist
version:General
educational level and competencies offered by work force.

A
good thought experiment to understand how the pieces of
the “sovereignty” jigsaw puzzle must come
together in order to achieve success might involve a scenario
where you are part of an oppressed group that suffers
under an intolerably evil imperial government.How does one go about organizing a separatist
movement and alternative government that eventually forms
an independent state that is liberated from the evil overlords
forever?Obviously
one needs money and other forms of economic power to buy
weapons and supplies.One needs a shared culture and values to motivate
fellow patriots to work together and risk their lives
for the cause. One needs to control ones borders to keep
imperial troops or spies and infiltrators out.One needs like-minded people manning the
strategic bases of ones rebel society, such as major media,
major corporate positions, and ones shadow provisional
government.One will probably need supplies from foreign
powers, just like when Americans went to the French for
aid during the American Revolution.(Conversely, the Confederacy failed in large measure
because if failed to gain the support it expected from
France and Britain
, and was further defeated by Russia
’s fleet support of the Union Navy). Another
approach besides using thought experiments is to examine
historical examples of viable “resistance communities”
and try to deduce their characteristics.Here are some examples:

a) New Englanders
at the time of the American Revolution, pure WASP’s,
descended from Puritans and pro-Parliament side of English
Civil War.Most
able bodied males were members of local militia (“Minutemen”).
Long historical ethnic memory, extensive family ties.
b) Watauga settlement, eastern Tennessee , during the American Revolution.Provided “over mountain man” militia
that played key role in defeating British at King’s
Mountain.Simultaneously
defeated Cherokee tribes and produced first governors
of Tennessee and Kentucky
. Most able bodied males were members of local militia
and had long historical ethnic memory and extensive family
ties.
c)Mostly
WASP settlers in Texas who beat the Mexican Army and ran the LoneStarRepublic
in the 1840’s.Strong pioneer culture and militia tradition.
c)Sunni and
Shiite Moslems fighting Americans in Iraq,
Pashtuns fighting Americans in Afghanistan .Very strong tribal, ethnic, and religious
bonds. Long historical religious and ethnic memory.Extensive family ties.
d) Irish who fought the Irish War
of Independence (1919-1921). Very strong tribal, ethnic,
and religious bonds. Long historical religious and ethnic
memory.Extensive
family ties.

We
might ask, what are some of the characteristics that make
these groups effective in resisting a foreign invader,
infiltrator or occupier?First,
the fact that they have strong ethnic, racial, and cultural
ties and a long shared history is a huge plus.After all, one of the rules of Right Wing 101 is
that the more people have in common on these levels, the
more likely they are to work together as mutualists and
altruists; conversely the less they have in common, the
more likely they are to feed on each other as predators
or parasites.Mossad-CIA
has tremendous funds to buy people off plus an impressive
assassination capability.A community needs all the cohesion and sense of
joint purpose it can muster to handle this unique threat.Second,
viable resistance communities tend to have strongly conservative
values. This supports the self-discipline required to
avoid taking bribes and the vision required to invest
in the long term survival of ones family and future generations.In
this regard, political leftism and pro-open homosexuality
activism are negative indicators, since these viewpoints
typically promote self-indulgent lifestyles that disrupt
normal procreation, family ties, and long term loyalty
to an ethnic community.Think
it through, and I think you will agree that achieving
full blown popular sovereignty rights implies the right
to (a) to issue your own currency (b) raise your own military
forces and decide when and where to make war (c) control
your own borders (d) put your own people in charge of
the strategic bases of your society (e) engage in separate
diplomacy and alliances (f) run your own police and courts
so that you are the territorial monopolist on force within
your own territory (g) control adequate wealth and other
economic power to be competitive in the world and (h)
maintain core values, to include an indigenous culture
and religion that supports the cohesion, distinctiveness,and will to survive of your society.The
process of trying to pull (a) to (h) together so that
outsiders can never again put their boots in your face
is called “nationalism.”This is what America’s internationalist Zionist
power elite has been working so furiously behind the scenes
to destroy for the average American –while helping
themselves like pigs at the troth to further Jewish nationalist
(or criminal Zionist) objectives.“De-nationalization” is what
they have been trying to do to us when they have erased
our borders with Mexico and other Third World countries, subordinated
our foreign policy to Israel , outsourced our main industries,
attacked white heritage and ethnic consciousness, and
undermined family values.

Appendix
V:

Walt Disney

Please
see the 14 July 2010 article posted at rense.com titled "Walt
Disney's War With Hollywood's Jews."The
following is a different article extracted from "Disney
Calumniated" in the magazine Instauration September
1997, first reproduced on page
one of the Stormfront thread, titled "Walt Disney
and His Conflict With the Jews." I have reproduced it
verbatim below without editing out some typographical errors.

A
few years ago, Instauration made a brief mention
of Jewish writer Marc Eliot's book, Walt Disney. Hollywood's
Dark Prince, a scurrilous attack upon a White Majority
genius. Having just finished the book, I can assure you that
it is indeed as bad as Instauration's reviewer indicated.
Eliot's contempt for his subject is palpable on every page
as he castigates Disney both as a man, and as the guiding
creative spirit behind a superior film studio. This denigration
is eventually carried to absurd lengths. At one point Eliot
implies that Disney had an unnatural relationship with an
adopted daughter. At another, he calls Disney a right-wing
fanatic, accusing him of being a spy for the FBI and betraying
his friends and associates. Since, as far as I know, Disney
was never so defamed while he was alive, these assertions
resound with the hollowness of fabrication somewhat akin to
stories whispered in the men's room between disgruntled employees.
Where Eliot really goes overboard in casting slurs upon the
filmmaker is when he makes aspersions regarding Disney's forebears
in order to turn him into, of all things, an Hispanic. In
this case, since the "biographer" could not produce
a single shred of evidence, the I ie expired in his gullet.
Disney's antecedents were Norman French-the name was originally
d'isigny-who went with William the Conqueror to England in
1066 and remained as farmers. A desire to worship as Protestants
eventually drove them to the New World and inculcated them
with a strong sense of Christian fundamentalism. Eliot uses
this as a weapon against Disney, "psychoanalyzing"
his "phobic behavior, obsessive handwashing, heavy drinking,
and sexual inadequacies," as well as his "lifelong
anti-Semitism." The last, of course, was by far the most
grievous of all Disney's supposed sins.

The
real cause of this vitriol, what really flenses Eliot's soul,
is what Disney achieved in an industry almost totally in the
possession of Jews. That a goy "hick" like Walt
Disney, the "all-American hayseed" from a Missouri
farm, could amble out of the sticks, thumbs in overalls pockets,
straw in teeth and beat a swarm of cosmopolitan Jews at their
own game was intolerable. It was rather like the fellow who
invented poker losing everything he owns to some yokel he
had taught to play the game. Make no mistake about it, entering
the entertainment industry, particularly motion pictures,
in the 1920s meant nothing less than going head to head with
entrenched Jews and all the terrifying prospects such an undertaking
entails.

Behind
his back, Jews called Disney a "bumpkin." Such luminaries
as Carl Laemmle, George Winkler and Charles Mintz did their
best to steal his studio the way they stole his popular character,
Oswald the Lucky Rabbit. After what Jews had done to him and
continued trying to do to him, did Eliot really expect Disney
to fling his arms around the Chosen whenever they sidled up
to him? Eliot is all too typical of the "we're always
right, you goys are always wrong" Jew who simply cannot
see himself as Gentiles do.

Disney
was also aware of how Jews used him. On and off Jews lauded
Disney for his contributions to motion pictures. This was
anything but altruism on their part. Following a series of
sex and drug scandals in Hollywood in the 20s and fearing
a Christian-prompted government intervention, Jews had scrambled
to set up the Hays Office to oversee the industry's morals.
The heads of the major studios had realized they had gone
too far in overstepping the bounds of propriety and decency
They would either police themselves or be policed by the hated
goys. in 1922 they installed Majority member Will Hays as
the cleanup man, thereby heading off a federal crackdown on
Jewish anti-social excesses in filmdom. What they had been
getting away with prior to this was the "anything goes"
climate of today or, in the Jewish vernacular, "letting
it all hangout."

Despite
extreme Jewish financial enrichment during the so-called "Roaring
Twenties," the times were still not propitious for Jews
to be rubbing Christian noses in kosher detritus in an overwhelmingly
Christian country. Knowing this, Jews feared the backlash
of fundamentalist Christianity against their anti-Christian
values and rampant materialism. Today, with the U.S. government
virtually led around by the nose by Jews, they sneer at the
merest suggestion of .censorship." Meanwhile the cinematic
filth excreted from Southern California poisons the entire
world. The Hays Office has been dead since Jews and their
liberal allies on the Supreme Court killed it in 1957. It
had served its purpose and was no longer needed. Jews were
so firmly in the saddle, they felt secure enough to promote
any form of obscenity, and proceeded to do so.

Disney
was the token Gentile in the industry who was always held
up as the role model, the example of all that was best and
brightest (and cleanest) in Hollywood, even as he was ridiculed
and slandered by these same studio executives as they lounged
in their fancy private clubs. Yet author Eliot contends that
Disney was largely motivated by blindly irrational anti-Semitism.
I wonder if Eliot would concede that maybe, just maybe, anti-Semitism
is understandable, even justified, in such a situation? I
rather doubt it.

One
special aspect of Disney's relationship with a Jewish dominated
profession needs mentioning. Eliot doesn't go into much detail
concerning it, for obvious reasons, but always there was the
burning envy and the attempt to emulate and downright steal
what Disney had created on film - the sheer originality of
his work. When he refused to be bought out or put his expertise
to work for them, they decided to overwhelm him with their
own product.

To
examine a classic example of this "copycat" mentality,
consider the following: after Disney's stunning success with
Snow White in 1937, the first-ever full-length animated feature
(Eliot refuses to concede even this ground-breaker to Disney,
insisting that someone else had done a long cartoon several
years before), Jews determined to beat him at what he did
best. Under Max Fleischer (born in Vienna in 1883), the Fleischer
Studio in Miami created a Disney rip-off entitled Culliver's
Travels, an animated version with goofy characters of the
Swift satire. Utilizing the talents of business manager Sam
Buchwaid, director Willard Bowsky, story man lzzy Sparber,
and head animators Seymour Kneitel and Myron Waldman, Gulliver's
Travels was rushed into production to catch the overflow from
the success of Snow White. Premiering in 1939, it was immediately
and unfavorably compared with the Disney classic. With Tin
Pan Alley tunes like It's a Hap-Hap-Happy Day by songsmiths
Sammy Timberg and Al Neiberg, not exactly a couple of Irishmen,
and one dimensional characters, the film was panned by even
the most hydrophobic Judeophiles. Small wonder, since it had
"Disney Impersonator" stamped all over it. And Walt
himself, the "hayseed," as usual had the last word-a
rarity, indeed, in 20th-century Jewish Gentile relations:
"We can do better than that with our second-string,"
he is reported to have commented after viewing the Cultiverflick.

Fleischer
tried to shift the blame onto Paramount Pictures, the Fleischer
Studio's controlling company, also monolithically Jewish,
for having pushed it into something it had no stomach for.
Following a second disastrous foray into feature-length animation,
Mr. Bug Goes to Town (1941), Paramount foreclosed on Max and
Dave Fleischer (it was over money, remember) and took over
the studio that had lamentably failed to become "another
Disney."

Little
wonder that Eliot's pages seethe with venom and vitriol at
the arrogance and success of this upstart Gentile "hick."

782

Why Walt Disney Is No Friend of Jewry

In
the November 1997 issue, Zip 113 gives an interesting sidelight
concerning Hollywood's animosity towards Walt Disney, who
certainly returned this lack of affection in full measure
and was quite well known for his scarcely concealed anti-Semitism.
Viewed from an objective vantage point, however, such anti-Jewish
feelings on Disney's part are quite understandable. In 1928,
Disney's cartoon distributor, one Charles B. Mintz, concocted
a scheme to lure the artist away from his successful "Alice"
series in order to create a new one which Mintz would legally
control. Disney and his brother, Roy, had no idea that Alice
was still as popular as ever and that Mintz had lied when
he told them exhibitors refused to screen the series any longer.
Mintz held the Disney "bumpkins" in such contempt
that he actually expected the brothers to willingly turn over
to him both their new creation and their entire studio.

Wait,
Roy and their staff, convinced by Mintz that a rabbit character
would be able to replace Alice, worked round the clock to
develop "Oswald, the Lucky Rabbit."

They stole Wait's rabbit

The
Oswald series was then peddled to Carl Laemmle, head of Universal
Pictures, a studio Jewish to the marrow. The public went wild
over Oswald, thanks to Disney's genius, while Mintz and Laemmle
raked in the shekels. The two shysters formed an informal
partnership to merchandise the Oswald character without Wait's
knowledge, consent or financial participation.

In
February 1928, Walt traveled to New York to meet Mintz. Following
an affable Astor Hotel lunch, during which he went out of
his way to show deference to the youthful Disney, Mintz ushered
Wait into his office and got down to the Tribe's favorite
pastime. His demeanor changed instantly from friendliness
to cold intensity as he laid it on the line. Disney would
take an immediate $500 per cartoon cut, a not inconsiderable
amount in 1928. The alternative was for Mintz to take over
production of all Oswald cartoons with the active assistance
of Disney's own staff! Perhaps the hardest part for Wait to
take was the loss of his creation, for Mintz had slyly set
things up not only to acquire the Rabbit, but all marketing
rights.

Stunned,
Walt stood there wordless. We can well imagine his state of
mind as he faced a man he had trusted completely. It is easy
to envision the "hick" from a Missouri farm recalling
all the stories of Jewish treachery and perfidy he had heard
in his Midwestern upbringing.

It
doesn't take much to imagine the raging antiSemitism which
was born in Walt's heart that instant, amid a scene indelibly
fixed in his brilliant mind. instead of giving vent to his
emotions, however, he mumbled something about "thinking
it over," and excused himself.

Believing
he had Disney at his mercy, Mintz made what he felt was a
magnanimous offer. At the next day's meeting he told Wait
that a sense of "compassion" compelled him to make
a "concession"--the newly formed Mintz Agency would
pay production costs and salaries for all subsequent Oswald
cartoons. All Mintz asked in return was a mere 50% ownership
of Walt Disney Studios!

Having
played the goy gull long enough, Disney made the smartest
decision of his life. He signed over everything to Mintz except
his beloved studio and caught the next train back to Los Angeles.
On the way, Wait made a solemn vow that he would never again
permit himself to fall into the grasping tentacles of the
kosher crowd. It was an oath he would keep till his death.
Shortly afterward, with a few deft strokes of his artist's
pen, Disney stole Oswald back from those who had Disney turned
his rabbit into a mouse suckered him. The result? A big-eared
mouse that would keep a Gentile studio on top of its Jewish
competition for 60 years.

But
this wasn't the end of it. In their book, Cartoon Confidential
(Malibu Graphics Pub., 1991), authors Jim Korkis and John
Cawley describe how Disney fired back at his tormentors every
time the opportunity arose. He would purposely inject anti-Semitic
scenes in his cartoons, well aware they made Jews squirm.
There was the added satisfaction of knowing that in these
pre civil rights days, Jews could do nothing about what was
obviously a guaranteed constitutional right:

In the original animated version of The Three
Little Pigs

(1933), there is an unflattering Jewish peddler
caricature that the wolf assumes in an attempt to trick the
pigs. Today, viewers will not find that scene because that
section was reanimated in later years by the Disney staff
to eliminate that offensive moment and the wolf is now merely
a brush salesman. (p. 37)

It
is not surprising to learn that these "revisions"
occurred after Jews took over the Disney studio. But Korkis
and Cawley mention one scene from an early Disney cartoon
which, at the time of writing, had not been expurgated: "Sharp-eyed
viewers can still see a very brief glimpse of a Jewish caricature
mouse in The Brave Little Tailor (1938), a caricature that
was repeated in the comic strip version of the story."
(p. 37)

The
authors also let us in on a humorous example of Jewish political
correctness when they discuss the pains which Jewish film
studios, which used to poke fun mercilessly at blacks, have
taken to clean up the old cartoons for today's TV audiences:

If you look carefully at this old Disney cartoon,
you can see a swastika

Chuck
Jones and his crew at MCM took the old Tom and Jerry theatrical
shorts that featured Mammy Two Shoes, the African-American
maid who was only seen from the knees down, and had to animate
new white legs over her chubby black legs. Phil Roman, one
of those who did the new legs, remembers that, "We were
brought in and spent days rotoscoping and reanimating the
legs so that they would be thin and white, not thick and black.
When we asked what they would do about the (ethnic) accent,
they told us they were going to put a funny Irish voice in.
We guessed it was all right to make fun of the Irish!"
(p.36)

782

Other Disney References:
2006-12-03 `Walt
Disney' by Neal Gabler, New York Times

Appendix
VI:

The
Revenge of the Neanderthal, Ethnic-Genetic Distance, and the
Neanderthal-Troll Connection

The
following are some sample articles that explain the Neanderthal
background of Jews, raising the question about whether Jews
are simply continuing a race war "by other means"
that has been going on for tens of thousands of years between
Neanderthals and Cro Magnon Man. For a complete list of articles,
please visit the Table
of Contents of the May/June 2010 special issue of The
Barnes Review.

REVENGE
OF THE NEANDERTHAL by Willis A. Carto,
"The truth about the Neanderthal is a historical web
that is finally being untangled. . . ."

PARTING
THOUGHTS: THE ETERNAL CONFLICT by George Kadar,
"...The 20th century in the Western world can be rightfully
called the "Century of the Neanderthal" and it is
up to us to stop this process."

The ethnic-genetic
distance concept:

Throughout
history people have tended to practice the axiom that as ethnic-genetic
distance decreases, the chances for altruistic and mutualistic
behavior tends to increase. Conversely, as ethnic-genetic
distance increases, the chances of predatory or parasitic
behavior also tends to increase, all other things being held
equal. See the article "Zoological
Subspecies in Man" by Dr. Raymond Hall which explains
how this behavior is not only common among homo sapiens,
but virtually all other mammalian species. Therefore, this
behavior is the instinctive result of evolutionary forces
common throughout nature. If
one knows where to look, one can find anthropologists like
the late Sir Arthur Keith who wrote A New Theory of Evolution
that explained why "tribalism," or the maintenance
of "Evolutionary Breeding Units," is adaptive social
behavior for natural environments. The
most unnatural environments created by man are typically
cities. Interestingly enough, for over 2,500 years, the Jews
have been one of the most urbanized peoples on this planet.
Not surprisingly, it is common to hear people who have come
to know the Jews well in big cities (as I have) criticize
them as being one of the most "unnatural" peoples
on this planet, heavily divorced from "healthy instincts"
(Jews are typically overly represented in highly perverse
social and political organizations, ranging from the North
American Man-Boy Love Association to the Communist Party;
the British historian Arnold Toynbee called them a "fossil
civilization;" Jews are over-represented around the world
at the highest levels of organized crime, and make up the
majority of traitors caught spying against America) and are
strongly attracted to ideological manipulation as an end itself
(the "brokerage mentality" described in Winning
Through Intimidation by Robert Ringer; see also The
Painted Word by Tom Wolfe about how Jews like modern
art more for its ideological statement than anything to do
with aesthetics). See "The
Scam of Modern Art" by Willis Carto and my own discussion
of Jewish criminal totalitarian psychopathology in my mutualism
vs. parasitism article. While
Jews are famous for being extremely tribalistic among their
own kind, they tend to encourage the exact opposite behavior
among gentiles. In fact, Jews tend to encourage unnatural
relationships among gentiles both in terms of unnatural divisions
and unnatural alliances. They encourage unnatural divisions
by supporting feminism, which encourages animosity between
men and women, and Marxist class warfare, which stirs up unnecessary
strife between people of shared race, ethnicity and nationality.
Jews also like to promote unnatural alliances by encouraging
interracial marriage, multi-racial immigration, miscegenation,
and homosexuality. Once
Jews are allowed to thoroughly work their influence on a gentile
society, it's social fabric is typically severely ruptured
on all levels. Its overall level of social and economic efficiency
tends to decline to Third World levels. This seems to be the
story of America in the last few decades.The
following are some key articles on the ethnic-genetic interest
concept:.

Interestingly
enough, even Jewish-controlled sources like the New York Times
host articles that explain Jewish genetic similarities among
each other, and distance from gentiles, such as "Studies
Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity" by Nicholas
Wade, NYT, June 9, 2010:

The
shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish
community are related to one another as closely as are fourth
or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10
times higher than the relationship between two people chosen
at random off the streets of New York City, Dr. Atzmon said.

Ashkenazic
and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry,
with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys
find. The two communities seem very similar to each other
genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated
for so long.

In
Chapter 14: "Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and Claims
of Jewish Superiority" of his book Jewish Supremacism,
Dr. David Duke provides insight into how Jews reflect enormous
genetic distance from white gentile populations. Jews are
able to compensate for these differences to some extent by
engaging in various forms of behavioral and superficial genetic
adaptive mimicry:

...The
first thing I found was information on the set of genetically
borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish
community, such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly
indicated a genetic variance specific to the Jewish population
and illustrated a genetic difference from the Gentiles.
Soon I found scientific papers dealing precisely with the
issues I sought. [footnote 628, 629] Genetic
researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing similarity
between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North
Africa, the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely,
they found sharp differences between Jews and non-Jews from
those same countries. [footnote 630] In
studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma-
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the
Jews that it may be said that, in general, blood group data…support
the relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities.
[footnote 631]Now,
here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and geneticists
-- the same groups who chronically preach to us that there
are no great differences between Blacks and Whites -- boldly
assert that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive
and relatively homogenous! They argue that some differences
exist between the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim (the main
ethnic division among Jews), but that essentially Jews are
a single people with a limited genetic resemblance to the
European populations among whom they dwell. [foonote
632]

•
In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977 by Bonné-
Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one by Karlin, Kenett, and
Bonné-Tamir in 1979, found when using fourteen polymorphic
loci, no significant difference in Jewish populations from
Iraq, Libya, Germany, or Poland. They estimated that the
genetic distance between Gentiles and Jews living in the
same area is three to five times

[Top of page] 330 [chapter title] JEWISH EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY

greater than for
Jews living in the different nations studied. In the 1977
study, the researchers state “not much admixture has
taken place between Ashkenazi Jews and their Gentile neighbors
during the last 700 years or so.”[footnote
633, 634]

•
Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of dermatologlyphic
data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are much more
similar to Sephardim (Middle-Eastern and European Jews)
than they are to the non-Jewish Eastern Europeans. [footnote
635]

•
Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis on 25
morphological characteristics, estimated that Jews in Russia
were six times more distant from Russians than Russians
were from Germans. They also found the Jews to be completely
separate from the twenty-four other ethnic groups studied
in Russia, Germany, and Poland.
[footnote 636]

•
Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year-old
Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer,
Smith, and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco,
Kurdish Iraq, and Eastern European countries. They found
more likeness between the widely scattered Jewish populations
than for the Gentile groups living near them. The ancient
Jewish skeletal group turned out to be far more similar
to the three Jewish populations than for every non-Jewish
group studied except for one, an Arab Druse group from the
11th century. [footnote 637]

One
researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by
saying that there was probably at least three times more
genetic difference between an average Jew in France and
his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average French
Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle East. The
Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that
Jews were that genetically different from all Europeans.
I knew a few Jews who were indistinguishable from the potpourri
of other European-Americans. From their appearance, it seemed
impossible that there was three times more genetic difference
from us than from Jews in remote regions of the world. But,
the research proved that a wide genetic difference existed
between Jew and European. I wondered why they did not seem
that dramatically different in their appearance. Fritz
Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance
to the European populations did not mean that their genes
were similar.638 He suggested that their similar external
resemblance could have emerged from the natural selection
of genes within the Jewish gene pool. These genes could
simply be a small cluster of genes that lay dormant in the
Jewish pool or that were introduced by limited genetic mixture
with Gentiles, and which then were selectively favored by
the social environment. Genes that caused a greater corporeal
resemblance to that of the Gentile host could have favorable
results in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, as well as
social advancement leading to reproductive success.

[Book title] JEWISH SUPREMACISM
[top of page] 331

By
a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies
not closely related, come to resemble one another without
narrowing their genetic distance. A very small set of genes
influencing appearance within the Jewish population could
thus be favored, causing a greater similarity of appearance
to the Gentile population while not narrowing their overall
genetic alienation from their host population. Over many generations,
the external resemblance to Gentiles could increase while
the parts of the brain that affect behavioral tendencies and
abilities could be unaffected. According
to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have come
to more resemble their hosts in their external appearance
while at the same time becoming even more distant in their
mental and behavioral characteristics. Whatever the questions
of physical appearance, there seemed little doubt that Jews
are indeed very different from Europeans and that they had
maintained that genetic difference for a very long time. I
also ran across a number of popular sources arguing that high
Jewish-Gentile intermarriage rates would end their genetic
distinctiveness from European Gentiles. As in so many other
matters dealing with the Jews, there is a wealth of information
on the issue, an underlying reality that is very different
from popular perceptions.

Jews = Hybridized Neanderthals
= Troll Relatives?

Interestingly
enough, quite a few sources on the Internet explain how it
is very likely that Troll mythology among northern European
peoples evolved from pockets of Neanderthal peoples that were
later overtaken by immigrations of Nordic and Celtic peoples.
Hence, the recent attacks on Iceland via Zionists such as
the Rothschild-controlled City of London, George Soros, and
Goldman Sachs might be viewed as a "Troll attack"
on a Nordic nation.

...In
the genre of paleofiction, the distinguished Swedish-speaking
Finnish paleontologist Björn Kurtént has entertained
the theory (e.g. in Dance
of the Tiger) that trolls are a distant memory
of an encounter with Neanderthals by our Cro-Magnon ancestors
some 40,000 years ago during their migration into northern
Europe. Spanish paleoanthropologist Juan Luis Arsuaga provides
evidence for these types of encounters in his book, The
Neanderthal's Necklace. The theory that Neanderthals
and Cro-Magnons occupied the same area of Europe at the
same time in history has been theorized based on fossil
evidence. Other researchers believe that they just refer
to neighboring tribes. The problem with this theory is that
neither Neanderthals or Cro-Magnons existed in this part
of Europe during the ice-age. Most of Scandinavia was covered
by a large glacier and the area was not occupied until much
later.

My
response to the "problem with this theory" cited
by this author above is that Ice sheets have advanced and
retreated multiple times over the last 50,000 years. There
could be pockets of Neanderthal tribes that survived even
into the historic era throughout northern Europe, just as
there are tiny pockets of somewhat blond-haired and blue-eyed
peoples who have survived in various places in Central Asia
in places like Afghanistan (for example in Nuristan)
and Iran even though the original populations have been repeatedly
overrun and colonized by alien peoples. Lastly, people can
import mythologies with their migrations from other geographic
areas. For example, the Jan/Feb
2007 Barnes Review carried an article "The
Baltic Origins of Homer’s Epics" which argued that
"Here is compelling evidence that the events of Homer's
Iliad and Odyssey took place in the Baltic and not the Mediterranean.
Reveals how a climate change forced the migration of a people
and their myth to ancient Greece and identifies the true geographic
sites of Troy and Ithaca in the Baltic Sea and Calypso’s
Isle in the North Atlantic Ocean—following Homer’s
own geographic descriptions."'

Signs
of Neanderthal man unearthed in Finland by Juha Valste and
Antti Halkka

Pages
4-11

For
a long time, the oldest known signs of people in Finland post-dated
the latest Ice Age, making them less than 10,000 years old.
Now, at Susiluola, in Kristiinankaupunki, western Finland,
stone implements and signs of fire have been discovered which
are around 120,000 years old. These indicate that people have
existed here during the Eem interglacial warmer period between
two ice ages. All the human forms as old as these in Central
and southern Europe have been Neanderthals.

Tales
have long been told about Susiluola (it’s name - for
some obscure reason - means "wolf cave" in Finnish).
The old folk were convinced that Susiluola had been inhabited
by mankind sometime during the Stone Age. Recently, a curious
local inhabitant was given permission to excavate the cave.
The National Board of Antiquities had no money to fund this
operation, no available staff, and in fact little interest
in the project.

Digging
deeply into the cave floor deposits, amateur geologists soon
unearthed blackened stones and roughly made stone implements.
They immediately abandoned their project, gracefully making
way for a thorough professional scientific examination of
the cave strata. Thus far, the site has yielded approximately
30 stone implements and over a hundred fragments produced
during their shaping. There are no rock types in the area
from which it would be an easy job to manufacture weapons
and tools. Some of the artifacts have been carved from red
shale.

There
are many layers in the deposits on the cave floor, some of
which constitute original floor surfaces, whereas others have
been built up from stones and earth transported there by either
water or ice. Pollen and spores from trees and other kinds
of plants have been found in the strata associated with human
occupation. These sub-fossils tell us that the climate 120,000
years ago was rather warm, in other words similar to what
it is today.

Susiluola
represents the first Neanderthal dwelling site that has even
been found in Fennoscandia.

Not
unnaturally, it has caused a sensation among anthropologists
and geologists in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

The
Wikipedia article on "Trolls"
(as of May 2010) has the following interesting comment:

Many
of the fairytale and folklore descriptions of "Trolls"
are similar to characteristics of Neanderthal people. Neanderthal
people overlapped with us (Homo Sapiens) for 30,000 to 50,000
years.

...Hawaii
is a good example. This mid-Pacific archipelago was brought
under white control by masterful American Nordics, who established
Anglo-Saxon institutions and taught the natives the rudiments
of Anglo-Saxon civilization. The native Hawaiians' like the
other Polynesian races, could not stand the pressure of white
civilization, and withered away. But the white oligarchy which
controlled the islands determined to turn their marvelous
fertility to immediate profit. Labor was imported from the
ends of the earth, the sole test being working ability without
regard to race or color. There followed a great influx of
Asiatic labor - at first Chinese until annexation to the United
States brought Hawaii under our Chinese exclusion laws; later
on Filipinos, Koreans, and, above all, Japanese.The
results are highly instructive. These Asiatics arrived as
agricultural laborers to work on the plantations. But they
did not stay there. Saving their wages, they pushed vigorously
into all the middle walks of life. The Hawaiian fisherman
and the American artisan or shopkeeper were alike ousted by
ruthless undercutting. To-day the American mechanic, the American
storekeeper, the American farmer, even the American contractor,
is a rare bird indeed, while Japanese corporations are buying
up the finest plantations and growing the finest pineapples
and sugar. Fully half the population of the islands is Japanese,
while the Americans are being literally encysted as a small
and dwindling aristocracy. In 1917 the births of the two races
were: American, 295; Japanese, 5,000 ! Comment is superfluous.

Clear
round the globe, the island of Mauritius, the half-way house
between Asia and Africa, tells the same tale. Originally settled
by Europeans, mostly French, Mauritius imported negroes from
Africa to work its rich soil. This at once made impossible the
existence of a white laboring class, though the upper, middle,
and artisan classes remained unaffected by the economically
backward blacks. A hundred years ago one-third of the population
were whites. But after the abolition of slavery the negroes
quit work, and Asiatics were imported to take their place. The
upshot was that the whites were presently swamped beneath the
Asiatic tide here mostly Hindus. To-day the Hindus alone form
more than two-thirds of the whole population, the whites numbering
less than one-tenth. Indeed, the very outward aspect of the
island is changing. The old French landmarks are going, and
the fabled land of "Paul and Virginia" is becoming
a bit of Hindustan, with a Chinese fringe. Even Port Louis,
the capital town, has mostly passed from white to Indian or
Chinese hands.Now
what do these two world-sundered cases mean? They mean, as an
English writer justly remarks, "that under the British
flag Mauritius has become an outpost of Asia, just as Hawaii
is another such and under the Stars and Stripes." (Viator,
"Asia contra Mundum," Fortnightly Review, February,
1908.)...

Appendix
VIII:

A Final Note: Nothing Is So Serious That We
Still Can't Get Some Laughs or Other Entertainment

A
joke gleefully repeated since the volcano erupted relates
that Britain "wanted cash, but because the Icelandic
alphabet contains no letter C, they got only ash."Another
quip goes like this: "When Iceland's economy died,
its final wish was that its ashes would be spread across
Europe."That
humor is one way Icelanders are dealing with the shock
of turmoil in their formerly stable country -- and with
finding themselves in the unfamiliar position of being
cast as villains abroad.One
joke perfectly catches the absurdity of tiny Iceland,
which doesn't even have a standing army, going out to
bully the world."You
mess with Iceland?" goes the gag, in full Mafioso
mode: "We shut down all your airports."

The "V" in the TV min-series might
also signify a "Viral" globalist loan shark
invasion that seeks to destroy countries like Iceland,
Greece, and Ukraine: "We're from the City
of London, the IMF, Goldman Sachs, the U.S. Fed ......and
we're here to help you leverage to the max, get rich
quick -- and if all this fails -- work it out through
crippling and enslaving austerity measures ... Come,
oh ye little nations, and be our New World Order and
New
Babylon slave masses!"