Who was behind the destruction of the WTC steel?
September 24, 2010
By: Chris Bollyn
My forthcoming article focuses on the Mossad-run network behind
the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade
Center. I have found that the network that arranged for the
destruction of the steel - critical evidence from the crime
scene - was organized by Israel's Mossad and their Zionist
agents, the real culprits behind the false-flag terrorism that
changed the world.

The towers were well built structures that used more steel than
today's skyscrapers. The debris contained about 300,000 tons of
steel that was hastily dispatched by a New York City official to
two Zionist-controlled scrapyards in New Jersey - before it
could even be inspected by engineers. These Jewish-owned
scrapyards then shipped the steel - hard evidence from the crime
scene - to Asian smelters where it was melted down far from the
prying eyes of U.S. investigators. Why was this allowed and who
was behind it?

An organization called the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now
(NYC CAN) is calling for the public to demand that the district
attorney of New York County investigate and prosecute those
responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the crime
scene. This is from their open letter/petition of June 23, 2010
to the district attorney's office:

Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau

Dear Sirs:

Over the last three weeks you have been informed about the
overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center Building 7 was
demolished with explosives. I trust that you understand the
serious implications of this crime and that you are resolved to
prosecute the guilty parties. To provide a critical
steppingstone in your investigation, I would like to bring to
your attention the widely documented – and widely protested –
destruction of physical evidence (structural steel) at the crime
scene, which I contend is prosecutable pursuant to Article 205
of the New York Penal Code, § 205.50 Hindering Prosecution.

“[A] person ‘renders criminal assistance’ when, with intent to
prevent, hinder or delay the discovery or apprehension of…a
person he knows or believes has committed a
crime…he...suppresses, by any act of concealment, alteration or
destruction, any physical evidence which might aid in the
discovery or apprehension of such person or in the lodging of a
criminal charge against him;”

I will present publicly available information on the destruction
of physical evidence from the World Trade Center site, below my
signature, in four sections entitled:

1. Official acknowledgement of the destruction of physical
evidence from the WTC.
2. Control of the WTC cleanup.
3. The decision to destroy the physical evidence.
4. The continued destruction of evidence despite public outcry

The supporting documentation provided in this letter/petition
from NYC CAN includes the following:

“In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the
deployment of the [FEMA Building Performance Assessment Team
(BPAT Team)], a significant amount of steel debris—including
most of the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the
rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the
recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S. Some of the critical
pieces of steel—including the suspension trusses from the top of
the towers and the internal support columns—were gone before the
first BPAT team member ever reached the site. Fortunately, an
NSF-funded independent researcher, recognizing that valuable
evidence was being destroyed, attempted to intervene with the
City of New York to save the valuable artifacts, but the city
was unwilling to suspend the recycling contract.”
- Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, March 6,
2002

“[T]here is so much that has been lost in these last six months
that we can never go back and retrieve. And that is not only
unfortunate, it is borderline criminal.”
- Joseph Crowley, U.S. Congressman, 7th District, New York

“[O]n September 28, the New York Times learned that the city was
recycling the steel. When the Times contacted Kenneth R. Holden,
commissioner of the Department of Design and Construction, he
said that no one from the investigative team had asked him to
keep or inspect the steel. The ASCE, it turned out, had faxed a
request, but to the wrong fax machine. Late that afternoon,
after reporters shuttled the correct fax number to the ASCE,
Holden said that a request had finally reached him."

Commissioner Kenneth R. Holden and his wife Frances McGuire.
Holden was given an award in 2002 by the AIA New York Chapter
after he had overseen the criminal destruction of the steel from
the World Trade Center. Why was he being awarded when he should
have been arrested?

By September 28, the DDC is publicly known to have been aware of
the BPAT’s request for the steel to be saved, however, the
decision to recycle the steel stood.

Of course, Mayor Giuliani – previously a U.S. Attorney – and the
DDC had to be fully aware of the illegality of destroying the
physical evidence prior to their decision to recycle the steel.
Their refusal to desist from recycling the steel when asked by
the investigative team to do so – still less than three weeks
into the cleanup effort, with hundreds of thousands of tons of
steel still salvageable, and relatively negligible revenue from
selling the steel not an issue because there was virtually
unlimited federal funding for the cleanup effort – strongly
suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and
motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they
knew had taken place...

Calls to halt the recycling fell on deaf ears. According to
Times reporters Glanz and Lipton:

“Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written
and oral requests for comment over a three-day period about who
decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision
might be handicapping the investigation. ‘The city considered it
reasonable to have recovered structural steel recycled,’ said
Matthew G. Monahan, a spokesman for the city's Department of
Design and Construction, which is in charge of debris removal at
the site”

Why didn’t the city simply stop recycling the steel? Again, the
outright refusal of city officials to desist from recycling the
steel strongly suggests their contravention of the law was
deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a
crime they knew had taken place.

I strongly support the NYC CAN petition to prosecute those
behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World
Trade Center. My forthcoming article will reveal the key people
involved in the terror network behind this crime.