Photographers into audiovisual footage welcome the headphone port. It’s an invaluable feature that lets you monitor audio quality as you shoot. The 6D II doesn’t have a built-in headphone port.

The flash sync port lets you connect off-camera flash units. It’s a priceless feature for those who shoot using creative lighting techniques. There’s also an external flash shoe but no built-in option.

Another advantage the Canon 5D Mark IV has is its additional card storage slot. The extra storage is essential in this case as 4K movies can take up a significant amount of space.

The EOS Mark IV’s CMOS sensor has 15% more pixels than the 6D Mark II (30MP vs 26MP). Its LCD screen is bigger as well and has over 50% higher resolution, but that’s not all.

Canon’s Mark IV has 61 focus points to the 6D Mark II’s 45. The viewfinder accuracy is also slightly better as is the color depth, low light ISO, and the camera’s dynamic range.

Canon 6D Mark II Advantages

Canon EOS 6D Mark II is a quality digital-SLR camera that costs a lot less than the 5D Mark IV above. So, is it a fitting alternative for those at the prosumer level? Well, it has a better battery to start.

You should experience around 1200 shots in ideal conditions on a fully-charged battery. That’s a whopping 300 shots more per charge than the 5D Mark IV’s 900.

Another advantage is the lighter camera body. The EOS 6D Mark II’s body weighs in at 765g which is 125g lighter than the 6D’s 890g. The lenses you mount define the ultimate shooting weight though.

This digital camera has an articulating touchscreen LCD display which gives it another brownie point. Creative photography often requires shooting at unusual angles and the tiltable screen helps a lot.

The Canon 6D Mark II also has Bluetooth connectivity. Being able to wirelessly transfer footage saves moving the memory card between devices. It’s a simpler process, too.

Shooting in low-light situations without flash requires a higher ISO. It also gives us more exposure control either by changing to a faster shutter speed or using a wider aperture, depending on the need.

ISO settings can help to freeze action or create a wider depth of field (DOF) in low light. The EOS 6D Mark II has a max ISO of 40.000 to the EOS 5D Mark IV’s 25.600. That’s a difference of 56%.

This camera beats the 6D Mark II with four additional cross type focus points. It also boasts a 15% larger sensor pixel area. Both models have RAW support for better image quality.

This may not be the Canon 5D Mark IV, but so far it’s a fantastic cheaper alternative. Keep reading to see all the major differences between these two popular products.

Canon 6D Mark II Disadvantages

This Canon camera doesn’t have built-in image stabilization (applies to both models). Of Canon’s 244 native lenses there are 65 options with the optical stabilization feature for the EF mount.

You won’t find 4k video or photo mode with the Canon 6D Mark II. This is only a concern for those who want to extract decent quality photos from high-quality video.

Another disadvantage with this camera is the slow autofocus with third-party lenses. It’s a particular problem with the Sigma brand according to user feedback.

The absence of a flash sync port will come as a disappointment to some of you. There’s no built-in flash either so you have to physically mount a Speedlight whenever you need flash photography.

The last grumble is that there’s only a single card slot. Still, the 6D Mark II is not as memory-hungry as the Canon 5D Mark IV 4K. They obviously have to reserve some features for the costlier models.

]]>https://photophique.com/canon-5d-mark-iv-vs-canon-6d-mark-ii/feed/010 Best DSLR Cameras for Video Recording & Filmmakinghttps://photophique.com/best-dslr-video-recording/
https://photophique.com/best-dslr-video-recording/#respondFri, 16 Mar 2018 21:20:44 +0000http://photophique.com/?p=5251More and more videographers are choosing to ditch the heavy cinema rig and starting to use DSLRs for their film projects instead. The choice makes sense. Many DSLRs currently on the market are packed with features that used to be exclusive to cinema-quality models. Our investigation of the market revealed that there are a host…

Spotlight: The 3 Best DSLR Video Cameras

The Best DSLR Video Camera

Canon 5D Mark III

If you know your way around the DSLR market, then you probably aren’t surprised that this renowned powerhouse from Canon topped our list of videography cameras.

When it was released, professional photographers and videographers were unsure if the Mark III could possibly surpass the incredible performance delivered by its predecessor, the Mark II.

They quickly found that it could. The Mark III produces photos and videos that burst with lush, colorful detail.

It also features a range of advanced video-recording features that filmmakers will find handy—all for far less than you can expect to shell out for a professional cinema rig. Pair this beauty with a DSLR video tripod, and you have one monster of a video recording setup.

What to Look for in a DSLR Video Camera

Whether you’re investing in your first video DSLR or making the leap to a higher-priced model, there are a few key technical elements you can’t afford to ignore. We’ve compiled a handy list of must-haves below:

An (ideally) full-frame sensor with 1080p or 4K recording capabilities (the former is a must-have, the latter is only now becoming standard)

What to Expect When Spending More

With the huge leaps that image processing has made in the last few decades, most DSLR users will find that even a mid-range model suits their needs. Seasoned videographers, however, might desire more advanced features from their camera.

Cameras that run at a higher price point usually start with a heavier-duty sensor and processor, giving you more pixels and speed with which to work. They usually pair those features with a greatly expanded dynamic range, sometimes reaching into territory normally reserved for cinema cameras.

Videographers can also expect a better video quality, since some newer DSLRs now offer crystal-clear 4K recording.

In recent years, more expensive DSLRs have also acquired an impressive range of videography features, incorporating zebra striping, auto-ISO adjustments, and a variety of inputs and outputs to support all your gear.

Rankings & Reviews

In this section, you’ll find a fuller explanation of each camera’s specs.

Ready to make a larger investment in a videography powerhouse? Meet Nikon’s biggest player in the world of DSLR videography: the D5.

This camera missed out on our top three list because of its hefty price tag, but it’s one of the savviest purchases that aspiring filmmakers can buy. It feels like shooting on a cinema camera—and a much more expensive one, at that.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers love the D5, and particularly praise its performance in low-light and action scenes where other cameras often fail.

It earned high marks for its autofocus system, with several reviewers humorously commenting that they found it difficult to work to trick the D5 into “missing” the subject.

What’s good?

Videographers will love the D5’s specifically film-tailored qualities, such as simultaneous external and internal recording, zebra striping, and auto-ISO adjustment to move smoothly from scene to scene.

What could be better?

While it’s an incredible value for the included features, the D5 is still a huge investment that might be out of reach for many DSLR videographers.

A few reviewers also report that images taken at a low ISO suffer from minor luminance issues.

What reviewers say about it

They were also big fans of its articulated LCD display, which they reported comes in handy when shooting fast-paced situations or changing settings on the fly.

What’s good?

The D750’s 51- point autofocus system is one of the most nimble out there, and additional features like simultaneously recording compressed and noncompressed 1080 video and zebra striping specifically tailor to the needs of videographers.

If you’re a fan of manual controls, you can toggle the ISO and exposure. And if you prefer a more hands-off approach, then the dual Auto ISO and Power Iris systems enable seamless transitions from scene to scene.

What could be better?

However, a few reviewers took issue with the D750’s autofocus system, which on average runs slower than some of Nikon’s heftier models.

Its smaller body also sometimes struggles to support larger Nikon DSLR lenses, which may pose an issue for video rigs.

Wrap Up

All in all, we think that the Canon 5D Mark III is the best choice for the videographer who wants superb performance, superior build quality, and optimum usability.

If you’re invested in the Nikon system or the 5D just isn’t a good fit, then check out the D810. It’s a stunning piece of equipment with specs far above what you’d expect at its price point. Filmmakers who are in the market for a less expensive camera can always fall back on the high-performing Canon 80D, which consistently impressed us with its ease of use and beautiful image quality.

Hopefully this buying guide has helped you determine which video DSLR might best suit your needs!

]]>https://photophique.com/best-dslr-video-recording/feed/0Nikon D7100 vs Nikon D5300https://photophique.com/nikon-d7100-vs-nikon-d5300/
https://photophique.com/nikon-d7100-vs-nikon-d5300/#respondWed, 14 Mar 2018 15:17:51 +0000https://photophique.com/?p=11829Today’s review compares the Nikon D7100 vs Nikon D5300, two heavyweights in the entry-level DSLR range. As the successor to the D5300, it makes perfect sense to compare these two. If you’re debating whether to buy the D7100 or D5300 you may be wondering, is it worth spending the extra money to buy the D7100?…

]]>Today’s review compares the Nikon D7100 vs Nikon D5300, two heavyweights in the entry-level DSLR range. As the successor to the D5300, it makes perfect sense to compare these two. If you’re debating whether to buy the D7100 or D5300 you may be wondering, is it worth spending the extra money to buy the D7100? Are there other features which the D5300 has which the D7100 doesn’t?

To be fair, both are great cameras and most photographers would be thrilled to have either one, depending on your needs. Though, you may be swayed to one or the other. Let’s take a closer look at each camera and see how they measure up against each other.

Both cameras have almost identical sensors which deliver fantastic results. Not exactly the same but they have similar specs. The D7100 has a 24.1MP sensor while the D5300 has a 24.2MP sensor. Both sensors are CMOS and the format is APS-C (DX format).

Both cameras have gone without the optical low-pass filter which the earlier Nikon cameras had, resulting in sharper photos when using high-end Nikon lenses. However, the D5300 wins in sensor comparison because of its Expeed 4 image processing engine. The D7100 uses an Expeed 3 engine.

One big advantage for the D7100 is a better autofocus system. Its 12 extra focusing points bring it up to 51 vs the D5300’s 39. The D7100’s AF system uses the Multi-CAM 3500DX, which along with providing these extra focusing points gives it a better distribution. This allows the camera to work with F8 lenses, while the D5300’s Multi-CAM 4800 only works with lenses up to F5.6.

However, despite these higher numbers, the difference is only marginal in testing and only really shows in low light conditions or with fast-moving subjects. If you tend to shoot in low light, or with fast objects like in sports photography, then the D7100 is the better choice.

Another advantage of the D7100 is its built-in auto-focus motor. Why is this important? Well, it allows you to have AF functionality with older lenses. Older lenses don’t have AF built into them like modern lenses. Not an issue if this is your first camera, but it’s something to consider if you have any older lenses.

The D7100 also packs a better viewfinder. 100% coverage and 0.94x magnification versus the D5300’s 95% coverage and 0.82 magnification. A better viewfinder makes it much easier and more comfortable to compose your shots.

Lastly, the D7100 has a stronger build with environmental sealing to protect it against rough conditions, and increased functionality from its extra SD card slot.

Nikon D7100: Disadvantages

Heavier weight

Slower processing engine

Weaker ISO sensitivity and range

No rotatable LCD screen

No built-in Wi-Fi or GPS

As mentioned, the D7100 has a slower image processing engine (Expeed 3 compared to Expeed 4 on the D5300). A stronger processing engine means less time to wait between shots, something that becomes more important as pixel count rises. Expeed 4 allows 1080P at 60fps while Expeed 3 only allows 1080P at 30fps.

A better processing engine also effects ISO range and sensitivity. With the D5300’s Expeed 4 engine you get less noise, a higher dynamic range, and a higher ISO range (12,800 vs 6,400). Twice what the D7100 can do!

All these are important factors for any photographer and the main reason why some will choose the D5300 over the D7100.

Another issue people will have with the D7100 is the fixed LCD screen. It is now common and practically expected that the LCD screen should be rotatable to allow easier low angle shooting or selfie shots. Something like this is almost essential when shooting video. So, if you’ll be practicing videography, he D5300 looks like the better choice for you.

Nikon D5300: Advantages

As was already covered, both cameras have very similar sensors. In good light with a quality lens, both cameras may perform the same by most measures. Although, the D5300 has a slightly higher pixel count, it’s hardly enough to count as an advantage.

What really puts the D5300 ahead of its rival is it’s Expeed 4 image processing engine. With a stronger processing engine comes faster performance when shooting continuously. You also get: a higher ISO range, a higher dynamic range, better video shooting and greater noise reduction in images. If you tend to shoot a lot of photos continuously as well as video, as anyone in sports photography certainly would, the D5300 is the way to go.

However, it’s worth noting that the real-world benefits of all this may not be so apparent. In testing, both cameras seem very comparable, so it really depends on how often you push things to the extreme with low light and fast shooting.

For ISO, the D5300 is well above the D7100: 12,800 compared to 6,400. When set to ISO 100, both cameras are nearly identical in image quality. Although the higher range of the D5300 seems like the better choice, don’t discount the D7100’s better AF system which will influence how your final shot looks.

The rotating LCD screen is a big plus for the D5300. This makes it far easier to shoot at low or awkward angles. It’s a small feature, but one that can be almost indispensable once you get used to it.

Nikon D5300: Disadvantages

Smaller, less comfortable viewfinder

No auto-focus motor

No environmental sealing

No headphone port

Lower LCD resolution

The D5300 may have a higher ISO range than the D7100 and the Expeed. However, the LCD screen, while at least having the advantage of being rotatable, has a lower resolution compared with the D7100. 1,037K dots vs the D7100’s 1,229K dots (18% lower). There’s also the fact that the viewfinder is a bit smaller and more uncomfortable than the D7100. Better coverage and magnification on the D7100’s viewfinder make the camera much easier and more comfortable to use in the field.

The lack of an auto-focus motor will also be an issue if you have (or, ever buy) older lenses. You’ll still be able to use lenses without built-in AF, but you’ll be restricted to manual focus – something to consider if you already have a collection of older lenses.

Finally, the lack of environmental sealing on the D5300 makes it more prone to weather damage in adverse conditions. With care, the D5300 should be fine, but you’ll just have to be more careful if the weather ever takes a turn for the worse.

Verdict

So, which DSLR should you choose? The answer depends on your shooting style. The D5300 is the better choice if you’ll be shooting a lot of video or continuous still shots. It’s also generally cheaper, making the camera easier on your budget.

The D7100 is the model to buy if lens options are important to you. The more advanced AF system will make it easier to get clearer shots, even in low light conditions. While the lower ISO count may seem a detractor, the improved AF system makes up for it.

In summary, both cameras are superb and would be great additions to any photographer’s kit. Which you choose or prefer will depend entirely on your needs.

]]>https://photophique.com/nikon-d7100-vs-nikon-d5300/feed/010 Best Travel Tripods for DSLR of 2018https://photophique.com/best-dslr-travel-tripods/
https://photophique.com/best-dslr-travel-tripods/#respondWed, 14 Mar 2018 14:30:47 +0000http://photophique.com/?p=5053Your bags are packed for that great vacation you’ve been looking forward to for a long time. But when you pack your photography bags, don’t forget to keep a travel tripod handy. Every photographer knows that a good tripod can make or break a shot—and you certainly don’t want to be without one when that…

Your bags are packed for that great vacation you’ve been looking forward to for a long time. But when you pack your photography bags, don’t forget to keep a travel tripod handy. Every photographer knows that a good tripod can make or break a shot—and you certainly don’t want to be without one when that perfect moment comes along!

There are many travel tripods on the market today, but not all of them will give you good quality for your money — and none of them is better than MeFOTO’s Globetrotter model.

The Globetrotter works wonderfully in the field, its durable frame and clever adjustability features

Its features outpace many travel tripods that sell for two or three times the price, and rave reviews testify that it works like a charm in even the most challenging of outdoor shoots.

The Best Travel Tripod for DSLR

MeFOTO Globetrotter

MeFOTO’s adaptable yet sturdy model is a home run across the board. Its rich features and usable design handily earned it a place at the very top of our list.

This highly affordable, lightweight model is easy to set up, yet locks firmly in place to ensure your equipment is secure and steady throughout shooting. Afterwards, it’s light enough to hook to a backpack or throw in a carryon bag.

The Globetrotter can capably accommodate any camera setup, from an amateur’s small rig to a heavy professional DSLR with a large zoom lens. And its many adjustability features allow you to position for the perfect shot every time.

All in all, there’s no better choice on the market today in terms of overall value and quality. You can’t go wrong with this one!

The Backpacking Tripod

Manfrotto BeFree

If value for money is your most important consideration, you’ll probably want to take a serious look at this offering from Manfrotto.

First off, this sleek model looks great. You can be sure that you’ll always look professional in the field.

But the BeFree has more than just looks. It’s also highly adjustable, accommodating a medium-weight camera at several different shooting heights with ease.

Plus, it collapses quickly into a portable package that’s lightweight enough to be carried all day without putting stress on your back. It won’t break the bank, but it will certainly revolutionize your photos!

What to Look for in a Travel Tripod

Ideally, a good travel tripod should last you for years—and vacations—to come. But in order to choose a model that will stick around far into the future, you’ll need to think about a couple of key features:

Load capacity: Not every travel tripod can handle the same amount of equipment. Make sure that the model you purchase can comfortably accommodate the camera you intend to use.

Compactness: This is one aspect of design that’s particularly important in a piece of travel equipment. If you intend to carry your tripod in a backpack or on a plane, make sure that it will fold up small enough to do so.

Height: You’ll also want to make sure that your tripod extends to a tall enough height to accommodate the kind of shots you want to aim for.

Materials: Carbon fiber or aluminum? Each has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, so consider which material will best suit your needs.

What to Expect When Spending More

A travel tripod will usually set you back considerably less than a studio model, but some still cost a fair amount more than others. Depending on your situation and intended use, a larger investment may be well worth it. You’ll want to be on the lookout for a few areas in which more expensive models usually excel.

First of all, a more expensive tripod will generally be made with better quality materials. Expect to find titanium and carbon fiber in place of basic aluminum, as well as sturdier fixtures. You’re also paying for adjustability—a pricier tripod will be able to adapt to more difficult terrain and accommodate more diverse shooting styles.

Those higher-quality materials will also ensure a better shooting experience. You can expect a more expensive travel tripod to provide more stability, so your shots will always come out crisp and clear.

For many photographers, it’s worth investing a significant amount of money for a travel tripod. No other single piece of equipment can improve the quality of your shots outside the studio, so consider your purchase with care!

Rankings & Reviews

In this section, we’ll be detailing exactly what we did and didn’t love about each travel tripod on our list.

We’ll be looking at elements like quality of materials and design, compactness when folded, weight, sturdiness, and more.

Which travel tripod earned the most points in our book? Without a doubt, the answer is MeFOTO’s Globetrotter.

This lightweight but dependable tripod won us over with its blend of great value, fantastic build quality, and awesome adjustability features. It truly satisfies in every category, making it a great option for any photographer on the go.

What you really want in a travel tripod is flexibility without a compromise in stability, a balance that the Globetrotter manages to nail perfectly. It keeps your camera secure while still facilitating fantastic shots.

If you’re in the market for a travel tripod that delivers premium professional results without the hassle or huge cost of a pro rig, then you can’t go wrong with this offering from MeFOTO.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers were full of praise for the capable Globetrotter, reporting that it handled heavy professional rigs with ease, even in more extreme settings.

It also earned high marks for general build quality. Reviewers say that the Globetrotter’s aluminum frame and sturdy fastenings gave them a rock-solid performance in the field without weighing them down.

Many reviewers were quick to praise the Globetrotter’s amazing value, saying that they had shot with similar products for ten times the cost.

What’s good?

For starters, the Globetrotter is built on a very sturdy design. Its durable titanium and rugged frame will stand up to windy days on the beach with ease.

It’s also insanely adjustable, with a 360-degree panning mechanism that can quickly accommodate panoramas, while the legs can be locked into two different positions to facilitate shooting in cramped spaces.

Unlike lesser tripods, however, that adjustability is only there when you need it. If you need a rock-solid shooting surface, the Globetrotter’s Anti-Rotation system locks its legs into place. Shoot with confidence every time!

Plus, the Globetrotter is incredibly lightweight despite being able to support a professional DSLR rig (or even your beginner DSLR setup). Able to stand up to arduous hikes or an all-day wedding, this tripod is ideal for adventure and event photographers alike

What could be better?

The Globetrotter’s adjustable ball joint occasionally breaks, and some of its smaller adjustment knobs can be sticky.

In addition, those highly adjustable legs come at the price of some stability, which shows during more extreme conditions.

It’s also a bit heavier than some of the entries on this list because of the materials used, so don’t invest in the Globetrotter if a light weight is at the absolute top of your list.

How does it compare in value?

For the price, the Globetrotter offers remarkable performance. It’s sturdy, highly adjustable, and puts out clear shots every time.

All these features mean that it’s a step up in cost from the most inexpensive travel tripods, but for that extra money you get a product that will stand up to serious use for years to come.

You can get many of the same features and results with professional rigs that cost upwards of a thousand dollars. At considerably less than half that cost, the Globetrotter really is a steal.

How has it improved?

Many of the features that set the Globetrotter apart from the rest of the competition are patented MeFOTO innovations, so you know you’re getting the ultimate in thoughtful, quality design.

In particular the Anti-Rotation system in each leg, which prevents slippage and instability, is a huge improvement over previous models from MeFOTO.

It’s also more durable than other models, supporting an impressive 26 pounds of equipment.

In the market for something a little more high-end? Then look no further than the Gitzo GT1542T.

Its name might be a bit of a mouthful, but this powerful model from Gitzo delivers across the board in quality, ease of use, and sheer practicality.

Comparable in stability and durability to tripods from Gitzo’s more rugged Mountaineer Series, the GT1542T offers premium features and performance, all wrapped up in an incredibly compact package.

Plus it clocks in at a very manageable weight, far less than many of the models on this list. Perfect for the photographer who flies frequently and wants to avoid those pesky extra weight charges!

What reviewers say about it

The GT1542T is a huge success with reviewers, who almost unanimously praise its lightweight, compact frame and impressive practicality for extended trips.

Reviewers also raved about the Gitzo’s lightweight construction and easy, quick setup and teardown.

All in all, the GT1542T comes highly recommended from hobbyists and professionals alike. Many even report that this small travel model has entirely replaced their larger full-time rig.

What’s good?

Where the G1542T really excels is in the realm of compactness and clever design. You’re investing in a product that can accompany you anywhere: in a backpack, on a plane, or out to a long, taxing shoot.

The G1542T is capable of folding up to a much smaller size than most other full-size tripods because of its unique design. Once the ball head folds up to nestle inside the collapsed legs, minimizing space inefficiencies.

In addition, the G1542 also employs Gitzo’s Ground-Level Set shooting technology, enabling you to snap away even in low-level shooting conditions. This tripod certainly won’t stand in the way of a perfect shot!

What could be better?

Like many other more expensive tripods, the GT1542T does not come with an included ball head, so you’ll need to supply that on your own.

It also comes up lacking in the stability department when certain adjustments are made, according to some reviewers.

Additionally, it does fall on the pricier end of the spectrum. If you’re in the market for something cheap and cheerful, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

How does it compare in value?

All of these full features and excellent materials do come at a premium price. Though the GT1542T is considered a mid-range option, it still bumps up against more professional rigs in overall cost.

We still believe that it’s well worth the investment, especially if you travel frequently and need something that will hold up to difficult conditions while consistently delivering perfect performance.

All in all, even with its higher price tag, the GT1542T is still an incredible value in terms of quality and dependability.

How has it improved?

One massive improvement that Gitzo has made in their mid-range travel tripod series is to introduce the light carbon fiber frame in place of weighter aluminum. That means that you’re getting the same stability in a more manageable package.

With its easy-fold frame and retractable ball head, the GT1542T is far more compact than previous Gitzo models.

So if you’re looking for a travel tripod with a range of cool and useful features, then you can’t go wrong with this one.

This powerful offering from Manfrotto is an ideal travel companion for amateurs and pros, offering support for rigs up to 9 pounds.

It earned a well-deserved place on this list for its extremely affordable blend of comfort, accessibility, and resilient construction.

The BeFree is also refreshingly affordable, with a price tag that comes in far below most equipment of comparable materials and features. You can get great performance without compromising on budget!

If you’re looking for the ultimate bang for your buck, then Manfrotto’s highly capable mid-range setup could be your best option.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers concur that the BeFree is a superior choice for extended trips, providing all the support and portability necessary for long days in the field.

In particular, the BeFree received praise for its compact frame and easy adjustability features, which helped many people get great shots even in traditionally difficult shooting situations.

It was also popular for its durability, with many reviewers commenting that it has entirely replaced their heavy-duty backpacking rigs.

What’s good?

The BeFree certainly lives up to its name! It’s the perfect size for folding up and tucking into a carry-on bag or backpack, and weighs in at far less than most other models of its size and capability.

Another very useful feature is the quick release head, which holds your camera body safely while you’re shooting and loosens with a few easy adjustments when you’re finished.

The BeFree’s newly patented leg angle selectors also provide for the ultimate in adaptability, letting you readjust to several different positions until you get that perfect shot.

It’s also great to look at, with a premium brushed metal finish that gives the whole piece an air of quality and professionalism. Both you and your shots will look fabulous!

What could be better?

A few reviewers were less than satisfied with the BeFree’s balance, reporting that it needs a bit of counterweighting to handle heavier rigs.

Its smaller ball head also doesn’t manage panorama shots well, since it lacks the smoothness in adjustability of some other models.

In addition, its legs don’t have the same advanced locking mechanism as some pricier models, so you’ll need to be more aware when setting up your rig.

How does it compare in value?

This is by far the most inexpensive of our top three picks, yet still delivers a comparable level of performance and versatility. You can easily use the BeFree to get the same stability and crisp shots that you’d achieve with pricier models.

You can expect to make some sacrifices in the areas of material quality, but for the impressively low price we still believe this capable model is one of the best values on the market today.

How has it improved?

Over the years, Manfrotto has made a name for themselves in quality travel photography equipment. The BeFree includes many of the features that have made this brand a hit with the pros.

The BeFree’s most useful new feature is probably its quick release system, which allows the whole rig to be folded down much more quickly than previous models.

Manfrotto’s patented leg angle adjustors are also a welcome development, adding a range of versatility to the model, while the new leg locks also provide increased stability.

Another entry that delivers premium quality at a slightly higher price point, we believe that the GoTravel is one of the best offerings from BENRO’s tripod line.

It has a range of useful features, including a , that you won’t find in any other models listed here. So if you’re looking for a unique design with a few awesome perks, be sure to give the GoTravel a look!

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers rave about the GoTravel’s manageable weight and flexibility options. Many reported success with both the tripod and monopod functions, and said that the latter allowed them to work in tighter spots where a tripod wouldn’t do the trick.

It also earned praise for its highly unique monopod capabilities, with several reviewers offering that they

What’s good?

Its quick-flip center column allows you to make minute adjustments to angling and position, while its steel spiked feet keep it anchored in the ground to ensure a stable shot every time.

A layer of thick, cushy rubber surrounds the legs, making it easy to grab and comfortable to carry for long distances.

Additionally, the GoTravel can easily morph from tripod to monopod with a few simple adjustments, a feature that gives you even more flexibility and is hard to find in many pricier models.

What could be better?

Unfortunately, even at its higher price point, the GoTravel kit does not include a ball head.

However, some of its less essential fixtures fall on the flimsier side, so you’ll need to exercise caution with elements like the column lock.

Here’s a lesser-known model that we think deserves a bit more recognition. With a solid aluminum body and impressively high load capacity, this offering from Sirui is a strong contender in the travel tripod market.

What reviewers say about it

Of all the travel tripods on this list, this Sirui got some of the most unequivocally positive results.

Reviewers absolutely loved its lightweight construction, and reported that it held up well on all kinds of shoots, from long overseas vacations to adventure shoots in the mountains.

What’s good?

Spiked feet, collapsible lightweight frame, and a quick-collapse center column, and included ball head and carrying pouch—what’s not to love?

The T2205X also pulls its weight incredibly well, accommodating a surprisingly large weight for a piece of equipment so portable.

It’s very well-made, plus its classy brushed finish looks fantastic out in the field.

What could be better?

Though it’s sturdy, the T2205X isn’t the most compact tripod on the market.

If you absolutely need something that will fit into a tight backpack or suitcase, then you may want to shop elsewhere.

We think that this charmingly-named model from 3 Legged Thing satisfies a sweet spot in the market: halfway between amateur and professional, it provides a perfect stepping stone for the growing photographer.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers were full of praise for the Rick’s quick leg-locking system and portable yet rigid carbon fiber body. They also loved the collapsibility function, which allows the tripod to stash easily in a backpack or camera bag.

However some also commented that the rig was a bit too wobbly for their tastes, and that the included ball head doesn’t accommodate heavy zoom lenses well.

What’s good?

With a smooth 360-degree panning head and quick release plate, the Rick offers a premium in adjustability and ease of use without sacrificing anything in terms of

Its ParaLock leg mechanism and durable grips also provide an extra layer of stability in difficult conditions.

What could be better?

While on paper this tripod can accommodate a lot of weight, you will lose out on stability and balance when mounting heavier equipment.

The Rick also occasionally falters in extreme shooting conditions. It’s not adventure photography level equipment, so keep that in mind when purchasing.

Ready to make a more significant investment in pursuit of the ultimate in portability and strength. This higher-end option’s incredible load capacity makes it a perfect choice for even the largest rigs.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers had high praise for the Grand Turismo’s light weight and easy folding design, saying that it easily facilitated long shoots and bulky equipment.

It also includes a comfortable carrying case and extra short center column, which is great for low-level work.

To top off the list, here’s something a little different: this tabletop travel tripod from RetiCam. You never know when you’ll need to shoot in extremely close surroundings, and in times like those a tabletop mount can be incredibly useful.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers had high praise for the RetiCam’s stability, saying that it provided plenty of support for most DSLRs or mirrorless cameras.

They also loved its compact frame and the included carrying case.

What’s good?

This offering from RetiCam is fantastic for those times that you need additional stability but don’t have the space to set up a full tripod rig.

Its durable aluminum frame provides a good deal of stability, while a 3-way tilt head lets you adjust for the perfect shot.

What could be better?

You’ll get what you pay for with a table tripod: a lightweight, easy-to-use accessory that can add some stability to some shoots.

It is certainly not in the same category as many of the heavy-duty travel tripods on this list, but it’s great when you need a small, handy piece of equipment.

Wrap Up

In conclusion, we believe that the MePHOTO Globetrotter is the best choice for professionals and hobbyists alike. It’s simply the best combination of value, build quality, and excellent performance.

You’re hardly at a loss for fantastic alternatives, though. If you’re an avid traveler ready to sink some serious cash on a professional quality model, then the Gidzo GT1542T can provide a wealth of adaptability, even on the go. Photographers looking for a more affordable option can always opt for the Manfrotto BeFree, which delivers an impressively wide range of features that will make your photos the best they can possibly be.

Hopefully, this list has helped you to choose the best travel tripod for your next big vacation!

]]>https://photophique.com/best-dslr-travel-tripods/feed/0Best Lenses for Canon T6ihttps://photophique.com/best-lenses-canon-t6i/
https://photophique.com/best-lenses-canon-t6i/#respondMon, 12 Mar 2018 15:28:00 +0000https://photophique.com/?p=12059Most upper-entry-level photographers want a camera that feels great in the hands and is easy to use. This affords you focus on taking awesome photos and videos without a single worry about your camera. It’s there, doing its thing. No problems. The Canon T6i DSLR is a model that meets these needs. This guide looks…

Most upper-entry-level photographers want a camera that feels great in the hands and is easy to use. This affords you focus on taking awesome photos and videos without a single worry about your camera. It’s there, doing its thing. No problems.

The Canon T6i DSLR is a model that meets these needs. This guide looks at the 6 best lenses for Canon T6i cameras across a range of optics. Some of the choices on this page may surprise you.

The Canon EOS Rebel T6i/750D is a popular choice with enthusiastic amateurs through to semi-pros. Its body is compact and lightweight which makes it a great travel companion too. This is also a great choice of DSLR for serious vloggers, vacations, and pet photography – among other purposes. It’s also a reliable backup camera for semi and professional photographers.

The sleek functional appeal helps to keep this model a bestseller. The 24.2 MP CMOS (APS-C) sensor, EOS Full HD Movie mode, and high-speed continuous shooting are some of its best-selling features.

Maybe you chose it for the built-in Wi-Fi and NFC. There are all kinds of practical reasons to love this model. Those professional looking stills and videos are just moments away with the right lenses.

My six lens choices are a 50mm standard prime, a 100mm macro, and a 14mm ultra-wide-angle prime. The final three picks include a telephoto zoom, a superzoom, and an all-in-one.

Samyang/Rokinon may not be a name everyone’s familiar with. And the cost of this lens is comparable with a Sigma (not ART) and Canon 50mm equivalent. Try not to let that put you off.

I chose the Rokinon 50mm f1.4 standard prime for a number of reasons. It’s a great value all-round lens for astrophotography, portraits, and landscape photography. It’s also well-built and made-to-last.

There’s a manual aperture ring that’s easy to use. Heck, you can even see the aperture blades inside the glass. After some experimenting I found it to be at its ultimate performance around f4 and higher.

This is an all-manual focus lens which is something that will appeal to you or it won’t. Not having electronics and automation means it has to stand out with image quality and build. I think it does.

What this lens lacks on features it makes up for in design, construction, image quality, and value.

What Reviewers Say

Most written reviews for the Rokinon 50mm f1.4 standard prime lens are favorable. A lot of shared reviewers report how they got more than they could have hoped for with a lens at this price range.

For some, this is the first all-manual lens they’ve ever owned. Almost everyone agrees that it’s no big deal once you get used to it. That’s something I tend to agree with, but then I started out all-manual.

The gripes get lost between the compliments about ease-of-use, sharp images, and impressive video, etc. Some find the included lens cap awkward but that’s a high-class problem and easy to resolve.

A few folks have written about the lens weight saying how it’s on the heavy side. At 19 oz. they’ve got a point considering the 50mm focal length. Even so, it’s not something that would put most people off.

What’s Good

The Rokinon 50mm has a fast f/1.4 aperture which is great news for low-light photographers. It’s also good for creating wonderful creamy out-of-focus backgrounds and handheld photography.

The circular bokeh effect is enhanced thanks to the curved 8-blade diaphragm. It’s an improvement on older lenses that have six non-rounded blades. They just can’t produce the same beautiful results.

This lens also sports a specialized Ultra Multi-Coating (UMC). The UMC does a pretty good job of improving light transmission. It helps to reduce the dreaded lens flare and ghosting too.

The Internal Focusing or IF provides close focus up to 17.7″. It also means there’s no change in the lens’ length or rotation. It’s a welcome feature for orientation-sensitive filters like polarizers.

What Could Be Better

At 19 oz., the Rokinon 50mm F1.4 is quite heavy for a fixed standard prime lens. To put that into some perspective the native Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens is just over 10 oz.

Weight is an issue for photographers who go on long shoots. The positive side is that heavier lenses often mean superior build quality compared to lighter ones. The build of this product is very good.

Despite being a third-party lens the price tag for the Rokinon 50mm F1.4 is comparable to the Canon. And remember, there’s no autofocus either. It’s still a worthy competitor but it won’t sway everyone.

The razor-sharp images and beautiful bokeh impressed me, but then this is a Canon lens after all. It’s an excellent choice for your Canon T6i if you do lots of macro work but it’s a good all-rounder as well.

However, if you want a portrait lens first and a macro second there are better choices. In this case look to the 85mm f/1.2L II or maybe even the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS.

I did some testing with close-up jewelry shots with the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS. The results blew me away. It produced beautifully focused shots with depth of field (DOF) control exactly as I needed it.

The EF 100mm also sports Canon’s latest hybrid IS or Image Stabilization (more on that shortly). I like the way this lens feels too which is similar to all products in the L series.

I always look out for those unavoidable flaws. They include vignetting, chromatic aberration, and distortion. I’m pleased to report all these things are minimal with this quality prime macro lens.

What Reviewers Say

There are lots of people with plenty to say about the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro. Most of what reviewers write is over 90% in favor of the lens. There’s one major gripe that I’ll get to shortly.

What the majority of reviewers share in common is how this is the perfect walk-around lens. And although it has multipurpose use it comes into its own as a quality portrait and macro lens.

People who take a lot of photos in all kinds of situations love it. They praise this macro/medium telephoto prime lens for its quality build and versatility.

A few find it a little heavy. Still, that’s the price we have pay for exceptional build-quality, weather sealing, and IS, etc. Another “major” frustration is how the autofocus tends to hunt at times.

What’s Good

The image quality is superb. You won’t find many photographers who disagree with the crisp sharp results. And although the autofocus can be a little slow its motor is still smooth and quiet.

A silent motor is a must-have when shooting ultra-close-up macro shots of living things like insects.

The image stabilization (IS) is effective and thus invaluable. It allows you to shoot without a tripod or other support and maintain sharp focus using shallower depths of field (DOF).

Despite the demand for IS a lot of lenses don’t have it. It’s one way to keep costs down. It’s the same with other ‘extra’ features on lenses like dust proofing and weather sealing.

The Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro has weather sealing and IS. I wasn’t brave enough to take my borrowed lens out into the pouring rain so I’ll give Canon the benefit of the doubt for now.

What Could Be Better

The AF on this lens has a tendency to hunt to find its focus. Hunting is something that irks photographers who just want to get on with the business of taking photos. It’s worse in low light.

The 22 oz. weight is not untypical for a lens in this category but some still complain it’s hefty. I found it well-balanced on the Canon T6i. It’s probably more of a problem mounted on other models.

Lens weight is also contingent on the photographer’s physical build and hand size. It’s also more of an issue for handheld photographers who go on long shoots.

The final gripe is the cost. I think it offers excellent value all things considered but some budding amateurs disagree. The premium price tag is a steal for more experienced photographers, though.

For less than $300 the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ultra-wide angle lens is a real bargain and works great with your Canon T6i. It’s not perfect compared to costlier alternatives but it’s perfect for what you pay.

A lot of modern photographers are not familiar with manual lenses. I can promise you it doesn’t take long to get used to them. Manual lenses also put you in full control and that’s a good thing.

The absence of electronics doesn’t bother photographers who are into astrophotography and the like. Needless to say, this 14mm F2.8 ultra-wide lens is a winner with folks shooting at the stars.

The manual focus ring is smooth to the touch; in fact, the entire lens has a quality feel to it. As for the image quality, there’s a little vignetting at wider apertures but photos are generally clear and sharp.

There’s no major chromatic aberration to worry about. And the lens’ multi-layer coating does a great job at reducing distortion, ghosting, and flares. It really takes some beating for a budget option.

What Reviewers Say

Reviewers tend to love this ultra-wide-angle lens which is one of the reasons it made my list. There’s a lot of praise for the overall image quality. It’s a particular favorite with nightscape photographers.

There’s more to this lens than its astrophotography benefits. It’s a beautiful piece of glass for taking those amazing wide-angle landscapes too. And it produces tack sharp results across all apertures.

Although this is a manual focus lens there are very few complaints. It’s easy to use and the manual focus ring is gentle and smooth.

There are some gripes about awkward focusing. These tend to be from those who are used to auto features and have perhaps written their reviews in haste. At least that’s the impression I got.

What most people agree on is the amazing price tag. For just under 300 bucks (at the time of writing) the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ultra-wide-angle lens exceeds most reviewers expectations.

What’s Good

This lens has a Minimum Focus Distance (MFD) of just 0.9 ft. The MFD lets you produce truly creative 115° angle close-up shots with dramatic results.

Images are tack sharp for a lens at this price. And only a very critical eye would notice the five stops of vignetting in the far corners from f2.8. It’s not overly noticeable to most others.

Another noteworthy point is the lens’ design and build. The actual barrel is quite small but with a big front element. Then there’s the even bigger fixed—and rather beautiful—hood.

It’s a good looking ultra-wide angle lens despite its basic exterior construction. It has a good weight for its size and a nice quality feel in the hand.

I looked at a lot of lenses in this category during my research and the Samyang easily offered the best value of any of its rivals—in my opinion.

What Could Be Better

We live in a world where many photographers demand auto features. This means the all-manual Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ultra-wide lens loses some brownie points with a few photographers.

Staying with the “manual” point, it feels like a long way (turn) from minimum focus to infinity. It’s one of those niggling things for people who shoot a lot of photos at varying focal ranges.

And finally, expect a little flare and ghosting to occur. Still, this is something to expect with a lot of wide-angle lenses that have large front optical elements.

My closing thought on this lens is that you gain a lot more than you lose.

The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM is a good choice for anyone who needs a quality telephoto zoom for everyday photography. This one replaces the older EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 USM IS.

I found the performance throughout the zoom range impressive. I didn’t detect any significant drop in image quality at 300mm either. We can’t say the same for a lot of consumer lenses in this class.

The minimal CA and light fall-off are no cause for concern. The max aperture is somewhat limiting though. That’s too bad if you want that all-out blur effect that’s so popular in close-up portraiture.

I like the build quality but as an all-season photographer, I’d like to have seen a seal around the lens mount. Weather-proofing and other types of protection are crucial features for some of us.

The above point is no minor detail for anyone who likes to get out and about in all weathers. Putting that aside, the lens is still an excellent contribution to Canon’s mid-range DSLRs, including our T6i.

What Reviewers Say

The EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens is another quality optic from the giant Canon. It sells well too, and that means there are plenty of user reviews to chew over.

You’ll find lots of write-ups that congratulate Canon on this general purpose zoom lens. They’re right too. Photographers, beginnerand experienced, love most of what this lens offers for a product in its category and price range.

Let’s not forget that no one forces buyers to write anything online. But with this puppy people can’t help but shout about the sharp images, quality build, ease-of-use, and value for money.

I’m serious—some of these reviews are as long as featured articles. The only gripes I came across were a little AF hunting, a noisy Ultra Sonic Motor (USM), and occasional trouble locking the focus.

What’s Good

The Canon EF 70-300mm is incredibly sharp across its focal range. It’s not total perfection but it’s pretty darn good for a telephoto zoom. It certainly meets the expectations of most shutterbugs.

This weather-sealed lens has a pro-grade build quality and sits nicely in the hand. The focus ring is silky smooth and the lens is smaller and lighter when compared to Canon’s 100-400 L.

At 22 oz. this is no lightweight. However, the 3-stop image stabilization means you don’t have to reach for the tripod each time you take a shot. It’s not the quietest system but it’s not too noisy either.

The autofocus is also fast thanks to the Ultrasonic Motor (USM). AF speed is an important buying factor for a lot of photographers. The USM isn’t perfect, though, as I point out in the next section.

The lens comes with Super Spectra and Fluorine coatings. These prove particularly useful in the field if there’s a lot of dirt and dust around. They’re no substitute for a decent microfiber cloth though.

What Could Be Better

There’s no such thing as the perfect lens for all photographers but there are perfect lenses for individuals. This one checks a lot of boxes but it has some notable drawbacks. A noisy USM is one.

Another issue—not uncommon to Cannon EF-lenses—is that the AF has a tendency to hunt. It’s doesn’t do it all the time but it’s particularly annoying in low light situations and with low contrast images.

The last gripe is a minor one that I came across quite a lot. The lens cover is on the cheap side and tends to pop off when you least expect it. My advice would be to simply buy a quality replacement.

Sometimes we just need an all-in-one lens to make shooting more about photography and less about equipment. My choice in this category for the EOS Rebel T6i is the versatile EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6.

There will always be compromises with a lens in this class but this one checks a lot of the right boxes. There’s image stabilization, built-in AF, internal focusing, and zoom lock among other features.

For an Auto Focus (AF) Superzoom, this one exceeds a lot of expectations but it’s not all good. I found the focus ring to be a little insensitive. That could have just been my hire lens, I’m not sure.

I could nitpick but I won’t. After all, this is an all-in-one lens and that means compromises on most fronts. The important thing is that it does what it says on the box and produces nice results.

The EF-S 18-135mm is heavier than a lot of smaller lenses but lighter than some telephotos. On the whole picture quality is nice—really nice—and the lens is smooth, quiet, and a joy to work with.

What Reviewers Say

Canon’s EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS gets a lot of user feedback. Most who write comments understand that it’s an all-in-one product and so expect it to fall short on prime lenses.

Reviewers like this one as it goes wider and reaches further than some other walk-around options. The image stabilization is another popular feature thus making it a great traveler’s choice.

Outdoor photographers love the range as it saves them from hauling around a separate wide-angle and telephoto. That’s the real appeal of a lens in this category. There are a few negative reviews though.

You won’t find too many moans on the quality front but some all-day shooters find the lens a little heavy. Another common gripe is the slow AF especially when light levels fall.

What’s Good

This lens delivers sharp focus across its optical range, especially in the central frame. The autofocus is fast, quiet, and smooth which is particularly reassuring when shooting video with your Canon T6i.

You won’t come across many complaints about the build. The plastics are good quality and there’s a snug-fitting metal mount. The lens is robust too and will stand up to moderate bumps and bangs.

The 4-stop IS or internal stabilizing works great. This adds further to the lens’ walk-around appeal. And there’s a nice wide focusing ring to assist the full-time manual focus when you need it.

Also worth a mention is the bokeh effect which is surprisingly good for an all-in-one lens like this.

What Could Be Better

No lens is without a few weaknesses and that includes native optics. The size and weight of this one cause some issues for inexperienced photographers who are not used to larger lenses.

Another common flaw is how the AF lags somewhat in low light situations. Sadly, this is not an unusual problem with many AF mechanisms across a range of otherwise high-quality lenses.

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS STM doesn’t have any weather sealing. That’s a real shame considering its popularity among outdoor photographers.

And finally there’s a little CA and vignetting at 18mm but not enough to sway buying decisions. Stopping down tends to clear any of these issues up quite nicely.

]]>https://photophique.com/best-lenses-canon-t6i/feed/010 Best Backpacking Cameras of 2018https://photophique.com/best-backpacking-cameras/
https://photophique.com/best-backpacking-cameras/#respondMon, 12 Mar 2018 14:45:45 +0000http://photophique.com/?p=5051Every adventure photographer knows how difficult it can be to find the perfect backpacking camera. It seems like they’re either too heavy to carry comfortably, or they’re too small to use easily, or they just don’t produce the kind of image quality that you’re looking for. Thankfully, recent years have produced many cameras that do…

Every adventure photographer knows how difficult it can be to find the perfect backpacking camera. It seems like they’re either too heavy to carry comfortably, or they’re too small to use easily, or they just don’t produce the kind of image quality that you’re looking for. Thankfully, recent years have produced many cameras that do admirably well on the trail, from large DSLRs to capable point-and-shoots and solid mirrorless systems in between.

What to Look for in a Camera for Backpacking

Buying a backpacking camera can be a tricky. You’ll generally want to look for the same kinds of features you would look for in a normal camera, but extensive outdoor use means you’ll want to think about a few special considerations as well. Here are some of the most important things to look for:

Image Sensor and Megapixels: The combination between these two factors is what makes a great photograph, so keep an eye on both when you’re choosing a camera.

Size and Weight: Think about where you’ll be keeping your camera—most likely around your neck or in your pack. That means you’ll want something that is a manageable weight and won’t take up a ton of space in your gear.

Speed: Having a fast camera is especially important out on the trail, where a few seconds might make the difference between a great shot and a missed one. Choose a camera that sets up and operates quickly.

Weatherproofing: You’re going to run into some rain and dust on the trail, so look at a camera’s resistance to the elements.

Affordability: Every photographer’s budget is different, so choose what’s right for you. Most of the cameras on this list come in above $500—some are high-end point-and-shoots, while some fall on the lower end of the DSLR market.

Build Quality: Obviously, you want to invest in a camera that will stand up to the test of time as well as the elements. A durable metal or strong plastic body and quality lenses will keep your camera working for years to come.

What to Expect When Spending More

If you’re serious about your nature photography, then you’ll probably want to consider making a bigger investment in a camera. For the higher price tag, you can expect your camera to come prepared for more rigorous shooting and deliver higher quality results.

For a start, a more expensive camera will have higher build quality, and will stand up better to the stresses and strains of serious outdoor work. It will also, on average, have a larger image sensor and more megapixels—that means that your pictures will look crisper, have more detail, and achieve a better color balance. They’ll also have better lens options. More money might buy a slimmer point-and-shoot, but expensive DSLRs tend to be larger and heavier—so they might not be your best option.

Generally, a larger investment in a camera will pay off in the long term, especially if you’re planning to take that camera on long hikes and into dangerous conditions. Choose wisely, and you’ll gain an adventure companion for years to come!

Rankings & Reviews

We’ve put together an extensive list of what we loved and didn’t love about each individual camera below.

You’ll find ratings based on image quality, megapixel count, performance in the field, durability and navigability, price, and more!

Plus it comes in at a highly competitive price for its class. All in all, the Alpha a6300 is the perfect choice for the adventure photographer who needs top-of-the-line performance in an extremely portable package.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers have plenty of praise for the Alpha a6300, with several reporting that it offers equal or better performance than their DSLRs with half the weight.

Many reported that the camera feels sturdy and well-built in the hand, and adapts well to shoot movies or stills with ease.

Overall, reviewers were unanimous about one thing: the a6300 captures astonishing photographs. They were consistently impressed by their images’ clarity, vibrancy, and detail.

What’s good?

A robust, ergonomic magnesium body with a sturdy hand grip means that you’ll always have a firm handle on this camera. That makes it perfect for action shoots.

One of the Alpha a6300’s most striking features is its autofocus. It’s actually one of the fastest in the world, and its lightning-quick acquisition and advanced exposure tracking ensure that you’ll be locked onto your subject at all times

Plus, an impressively large sensor packed with megapixels is sure to produce exactly the kind of images you’d expect from an Alpha series: clear, bright, and rich.

Subject tracking is a breeze with the 2.4 million-dot Tru Finder system, which mimics the immediacy of an optical viewfinder—there’s one of those, too, if you prefer to stick to the old school.

It’s tech-savvy, too, with built in wi-fi for file transfer and a tilting 3-inch LCD screen, which make viewing and sharing those awesome travel photos easier than ever!

What could be better?

Overall, our biggest problem with the a6300 is the interface. It’s clunky and unintuitive, and the plethora of buttons and knobs is intimidating.

The LCD screen isn’t touch-sensitive, and some of the ergonomic design choices have sacrificed usability.

Another factor to consider is the price. The Alpha a6300 comes in at close to what you’d spend for a DSLR, so do some comparison before you purchase.

How does it compare in value?

This camera definitely isn’t cheap. It’s actually more expensive than some comparable DSLRs, as mentioned above.

But if you’re in the market for a truly suitable backpacking camera, then going mirrorless might be your best bet. The Alpha a6300 is lighter and more durable than those comparable cameras

All in all, we think that the a6300’s consistently stellar image quality and speedy performance in the field make it well worth the cost.

How has it improved?

For the last few years Sony has been at the forefront of the mirrorless camera market, delivering exceptional products that push the boundaries of the system.

A particularly notable improvement for the Alpha a6300 is its speedy autofocus, which is one of the best ever designed.

It’s also more technically competent than past models, with wi-fi compatibility and an impressive subject tracking system. If you’re looking for a fantastic bridge camera for hitting the trails, this could be the one!

Looking for image quality to rival the pros? If you’re in the market for a backpacking-ready DSLR, you can’t do better than the Nikon D7200.

A DSLR designed to appeal to both professionals and hobby photographers alike, the D7200 does a fantastic job of balancing affordability, performance, and size—which makes it ideal for

We were wowed by its impressive autofocus system, superior image quality, and intuitive, useful features.

If you have space in your pack for this gem, then don’t hesitate—it’s one of the best Nikon has on the market today.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers rave about the D7200’s awesome image quality. Photos taken on the D7200 are bright yet balanced, crisp, and full of color.

They also had great things to say about its build quality and durability, saying that it had held up admirably to every shooting test.

Nearly all the reviewers said that the D7200 had performed above and beyond their expectations based on its price, and that it rivals much pricier cameras in terms of quality,

What’s good?

The D7200 is a worthy addition to Nikon’s line, offering many of the features that have made the brand legendary all wrapped up in a very affordable package.

A powerful 24-megapixel CMOS sensor delivers exactly what you would expect from a high-end Nikon: detailed, lush images with very low noise or interference.

Advanced ISO settings and low-noise priority mean that it’s ideal for low-light and night photography as well, making it the perfect choice for those awesome night sky shots.

Plus, its high-speed frame rate and huge continuous shooting capacity make it a natural choice for action photography. And with built-in wi-fi sharing, you won’t need to wait to broadcast those awesome shots to the world!

It has incredible battery life too, averaging over 1100 shots on a single charge.

What could be better?

Though it’s overall a fantastic camera, the D7200’s tech capacities could definitely be better.

The wi-fi and near field communication systems are unreliable at times, which can be a hassle.

It’s not ideal for video either, with a sluggish live view autofocus and a lack of independent aperture control.

How does it compare in value?

Priced as it is, the D7200 is an absolutely great value. It delivers performance to rival much more expensive full-frame cameras.

It’s weatherproof and durable as well, so you can have confidence that you’re investing in an outdoors companion for years to come.

We believe that this is the best DSLR you can purchase for backpacking at such a reasonable price point.

How has it improved?

Nikon has done a wonderful job at tailoring their distinctive system feature to suit such a lightweight, portable model.

The D7200 fixes a few issues from previous models. It has a much faster frame rate and a stronger, brighter dynamic range.

Technological features—such as wi-fi and a meatier sensor and battery—are also welcome improvements.

If you’re looking for a camera that’s ultra-light and portable but doesn’t sacrifice quality, then a point-and-shoot might be your best option. This offering from Ricoh is a fantastic choice.

The GR II is consistently regarded as one of the highest quality point-and-shoots on the market. Plenty of pro nature photographers carry this as one of their main cameras, an impressive achievement for such a compact piece of equipment.

It’s packed with features and performance to rival the big guys, including a gigantic image sensor and a gorgeous 28-35mm lens.

Plus, the GR II is insanely affordable, easily halving the price of our two other top picks. That makes it a winner in our book!

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers are unanimous that, with regard to features and image quality, this is the best point-and-shoot body they’ve ever used.

They particularly praised its ergonomic build, incredibly lightweight design, and great image sensor, saying it put out images as good as their DSLRs.

Many pros have opted to carry this hardy little camera as a second body, or even as their primary tool.

What’s good?

This simply one of the best point-and-shoots out there, bar none—but its durability and light weight make it ideal for the backpacking photographer as well.

With 16 megapixels and an APS-C sized, DSLR-level image sensor, the Ricoh turns out incredibly beautiful images that are high in color detail and low on noise.

An anti-aliasing design and a beautiful quick focus lens give your photos the treatment they deserve. Plus, the focal range is absolutely ideal for nature and landscape shots.

It shoots 1080p HD video as well, so you’ll always have a range of capture modes at your disposal.

And all this in a compact, sensibly weatherproofed package that comes in far below $1000!

What could be better?

Ricoh has incorporated wi-fi capabilities into the GR II, and while that’s good in concept the sharing options are thin and the interface is confusing.

It’s also not as full-featured in terms of adjustability as some other models on this list, so consider that before purchasing.

In addition, some reviewers were also less than enthusiastic about its build quality, saying that some parts seemed flimsy.

How does it compare in value?

This is, by far, the most inexpensive camera in our top three, but it’s certainly not a small investment.

However, if you want a point-and-shoot that can compete with DSLRs as far as image quality, this is the one for you.

The GR II’s sensor is larger than any other camera of its size and weight on the market today. You just won’t find the same level of image quality from other point-and-shoots, and that makes it well worth the higher price tag.

How has it improved?

Ricoh is a smaller brand, but they’ve worked hard to expand the features and capabilities of their higher-end line.

In particular, we like the GR II’s new anti-aliasing design and HD video capabilities, which do a great job of making this camera viable for a wider range of users.

It’s also lighter and slimmer than previous models, with an ultra-sleek casing and durable grip. If you want DSLR results from a point-and-shoot package, the GR II might be right for you.

If you’re ready to take your trail photographs to the next level and willing to invest in a quickly-expanding mirrorless line, then take a look at this offering from Sony.

An excellent addition to the Alpha line, it delivers the powerful performance of more expensive models in an accessible body.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers said this was one of the best travel cameras they’d ever used! It rivals much larger and more expensive cameras in terms of overall image quality.

They also loved the tight, durable body design, the ultra-responsive viewfinder, and fast autofocus, saying that these features proved invaluable on challenging shoots. Welcome news for the photographer on the go!

What’s good?

One of the a6000’s best features is its Exmor 24 megapixel sensor, which produces images on par with high-end DSLRs.

We also love its speedy continuous autofocus system—which is one of the fastest ever produced—and its rich, high-contrast viewfinder that helps you snag the perfect shot.

Video and low-light shots aren’t a problem either, thanks to full HD movie mode and an impressive ISO range.

What could be better?

Since the power zoom lens and other features use up a lot of power, the a6000’s battery life is disappointingly short.

It also stumbles a bit in high contrast shooting scenarios, so it’s best to watch the exposure carefully.

If you’re really prepared to take the plunge, consider investing in the EOS 6D. An impressive DSLR in its own right, it’s also light enough to take on the trail.

What reviewers say about it

The EOS 6D is a perennial hit with reviewers. They love its spectacular image production, smooth, solid handling, and great autofocus system.

Plenty of professionals and hobbyists alike will testify to this being their favorite camera ever—a ringing endorsement!

What’s good?

With a class-leading CMOS sensor, 11-point autofocus, and exceptional image quality across its entire ISO range, the 6D is remarkably adaptable. It shoots well anywhere, anytime.

Plus, its magnesium body and durable shutter design guarantee that the 6D will be by your side for many, many shoots.

One new feature that we particularly love is the EOS 6D’s smartphone and tablet compatibility, which allows you to control the camera remotely from another device. That’s a godsend for nature photographers.

What could be better?

The bottom line is: the 6D is heavier than you might want while hiking or backpacking. It’s big and complicated too, so don’t expect to whip it out quickly.

There isn’t a built-in flash either, which means you may need to carry around another piece of equipment.

Ready for a camera that gives you big brand performance in a tiny package? Then meet the PowerShot G16, a capable model from Canon that

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers had high praise for the G16’s incredibly durable yet portable body, saying that it feels great in the hand, and was easy to slip into a backpack or bag.

They also loved its speedy autofocus.

What’s good?

We love the G16 for its sophisticated CMOS sensor, its speedy processor, and the Canon HS system that gives you crisp shots even in low light.

The 5X optical zoom and range of creative shooting modes let you customize your shots on the go—and when you’re done shooting, you can easily upload them to your smartphone using the Canon Image Gateway software.

The G16 also shoots full HD 1080p video, at a quality that far surpasses what you’d expect from its size.

What could be better?

Since the G16 is a smaller and cheaper model, it doesn’t have as large a sensor or as many megapixels as many of the cameras on this list.

Its menus and interface are also a bit sluggish and difficult to navigate, so it’s not for the technologically challenged.

Wrap Up

In conclusion, we believe that the Sony Alpha a6300 is simply the best backpacking camera on the market today. It has everything you could possibly need: top-notch build quality, a lighting-fast autofocus system, and a sensor that delivers rich, crisp images no matter the conditions.

For the photographer who’s looking for a full-featured DSLR and doesn’t mind a bit of extra weight, the Nikon D7200 is the best choice on the market. Its fantastic battery life, capable image sensor, and rugged build make it ideal for the busy nature lover. You might also want to take a look at the Ricoh GR II, a rugged diamond in the rough that can stand up to the trail without ever scrimping on performance. It’s perfect for the photographer who wants to travel light without giving up superior performance.

The backpacking photographer has a range of fantastic camera options available to them on today’s market. Hopefully, this list has helped you to figure out which backpacking camera is right for you!

]]>https://photophique.com/best-backpacking-cameras/feed/0Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5200https://photophique.com/nikon-d5300-vs-nikon-d5200/
https://photophique.com/nikon-d5300-vs-nikon-d5200/#respondFri, 09 Mar 2018 14:00:10 +0000https://photophique.com/?p=11822Today’s comparison compares the Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5200. How does the D5300 measure up against the D5200 and what are the key differences and similarities between the two entry level DSLRs? As with most camera upgrades by Nikon they’ve focused on small adjustments and improvements rather than a full overhaul. Newer models can generally…

]]>Today’s comparison compares the Nikon D5300 vs Nikon D5200. How does the D5300 measure up against the D5200 and what are the key differences and similarities between the two entry level DSLRs?

As with most camera upgrades by Nikon they’ve focused on small adjustments and improvements rather than a full overhaul. Newer models can generally be regarded as better than their predecessors but there will always be some tradeoffs. Is the higher price tag for the D5300 worth it? Let’s take a look and see how they stack up against each other.

Nikon D5300: Advantages

Released just a year after its predecessor, the D5300 is slightly smaller and lighter than the D5200. This makes it both lightweight and compact as a midrange camera. Photographers with large hands and/or longish fingers should find it very comfortable with its deep grip and rubberized thumb rest.

While it still uses the same 24.2MP sensor as the D5200 (just 0.1MP higher) the imaging processor has been upgraded from Expeed 3 to Expeed 4, giving it greater ISO sensitivity, noise reduction and image sharpness. The lack of an anti-aliasing filter also results in even sharper photos.

What really sets it apart from the D5200 is in the extra features. The D5300 is the first Nikon DSLR to feature built-in Wi-Fi and GPS connectivity. Previous models had to rely on optional add-ons. The Wi-Fi functions allow the D5300 to easily pair with any iOS or Android smartphone and easily edit and post your photos on social media.

The built-in GPS allows you to log location information such as longitude, latitude, and altitude in the images EXIF data. Something which can be used when uploading to image sharing sites such as 500px.com.

The rear LCD screen has been slightly improved from 3-inches to 3.2-inches and 921,000K dots resolution to 1,037K dots. Other than that, the screens are identical with the same side facing hinge and anti-glare coating.

When looking at ISO, the D5300 shows a good balance between noise levels and detail retention. Erring on the side of more chromatic noise rather than sacrificing detail. Noise levels are more than acceptable up to ISO 1600 and become progressively more noticeable from there, becoming effectively useless at ISO 3200.

Video record times and resolution are completely identical on both models at 1080p. Both also have the option of adding an external stereo microphone.

Nikon D5300: Disadvantages

Few direct controls

Lack of anti-aliasing filter means more susceptible aliasing effects

Both DSLR’s suffer from similar disadvantages such as no image stabilization, no panorama mode, no touchscreen and no top-down display. The most frustrating problem, for both cameras, is the lack of direct controls. There is no dedicated button for changing ISO or exposure, instead, they must be selected through the Fn button, something which can be problematic when timing is important.

No touch screen is provided for either camera which is something many photographers have come to expect in cameras these days, particularly for things such as exposure compensation and AF point placement.

Another downside, depending on how you look at it, is the lack of an anti-aliasing filter on the D5300. This makes each image sharper than its predecessor but also means it’s more prone to aliasing effects.

Burst mode tends to slow down when used on its highest quality 14-bit RAW images. Also, no jack is provided for headphones and the GPS has been reported as being less accurate than some of its competitors.

Nikon D5200: Advantages

When the D5200 first came out in 2013 it was a step well above its predecessors in the midrange department. Despite having an almost identical build and feel as its predecessor the D5100, it featured an upgraded 24.1MP sensor, just 0.1MP behind the D5300. Its Expeed 3 processing engine also gave it a higher ISO range than the D5100, once which has now been superseded by the D5300’s Expeed 4 engine.

In most respects, it’s virtually identical to the D5300 but many differences are apparent on closer examination such as the slightly smaller LCD screen and lower resolution of 920K dots. Just like the D5300, the LCD screen is hinged at the side, allowing it to be folded out from the left side of the camera and folded inwards to protect it when not in use.

For ISO sensitivity, the D5200 handles noise reduction well until ISO 800. After that, it gets progressively worse until peeking out at ISO 3200. Although, all similar cameras such as the Sony SLT, Canon EOS T4i, and Nikon D5300 have the same problems.

The use of an anti-aliasing filter means you get less foreign objects appearing on screen, known as moire. This is somewhat a good thing but it means a loss in sharpness, something which can present a problem when printing large or cropping tight.

The D5200 has two burst modes. When set to Continues High (CH) the camera can shoot as fast as 5 fps. At Continues Low (CL) it shoots at 3 fpm. A rate which goes down in both modes when shooting in RAW. In testing, it tended to do better than the D5300 in holding out for longer before slowing, though the result was too inconsistent to be certain.

Nikon D5200: Disadvantages

No built-in Wi-Fi

No built-in GPS

Anti-aliasing filter causes less detail in photos

Slightly smaller LCD screen size and resolution

Lower ISO tolerance and noise reduction

Weaker processing engine

The differences between both cameras may not be apparent on the surface but a quick test and evaluation reveal the striking differences. Granted, these are differences that may not make a big difference to photographers that only capture in JPEG and post on social media. For higher level photographers, though, these differences stand out.

The lack of any built-in Wi-Fi or GPS also puts it below its successor in usability. Although their video shooting capabilities were the same you have to deal with a slightly smaller LCD screen and resolution quality.

The anti-aliasing filter is becoming an outdated way of dealing with moire and now is only regarded as causing a loss of detail. Later version cameras now deal with it through a higher megapixel count.

Both cameras still have similar problems such as few direct controls or image stabilization. For midrange cameras, this is hardly surprising but even the Sony SLT A57, a camera in the same league, has neither of these problems.

Verdict

It’s pretty clear that the better camera is the D5300. As a successor model, it took everything good about the D5200 and upgraded it. A faster processor engine, larger LCD screen, slightly increased megapixel count and other helpful features make the D5300 the smarter buy.

The D5200 is still an effective camera, and at the time represented a big jump from the previous D5100. But now, it’s been materially superseded by a newer Nikon model.

]]>https://photophique.com/nikon-d5300-vs-nikon-d5200/feed/010 Best Shotgun Microphones for DSLR of 2018https://photophique.com/best-shotgun-microphones/
https://photophique.com/best-shotgun-microphones/#commentsFri, 09 Mar 2018 13:45:47 +0000http://photophique.com/?p=5052If you’re interested in taking the plunge into DSLR videography, then the best single investment you can make is a shotgun DSLR microphone. Going external has many benefits: most in-body mics provide negligible sound quality, and don’t let you control many settings, so opting for a shotgun mic can give you more control Of course,…

If you’re interested in taking the plunge into DSLR videography, then the best single investment you can make is a shotgun DSLR microphone. Going external has many benefits: most in-body mics provide negligible sound quality, and don’t let you control many settings, so opting for a shotgun mic can give you more control

Of course, there are many shotgun microphones on the market today. From all the ones that we ranked, the VideoMic Pro from Rode was our favorite. The VideoMic Pro earned rave reviews for its functionality and intelligent construction.

It has a range of great, usable features that come in handy during a range of shooting situations. With the Rode VideoMic, you’re sure to find a great companion for all your video work.

What to Look for in a Shotgun Microphone for DSLR

Range: Each shotgun microphone has a different range, so choose the one that suits the kind of shooting you plan to do with it.

Accessories: Many shotgun mics come with a few audio enhancement accessories, so check out the package to see what kind of deal you’re getting.

Battery Life: No one wants to stop every hour to change their mic’s battery, so invest in a shotgun microphone that will give you the battery life your projects need.

Size and Weight: You don’t want a heavy, bulky piece of equipment constantly weighing your camera down, so take size into account.

Build Quality: Really look at the way the shotgun mic is put together. You want quality materials and sturdy construction.

What to Expect When Spending More

There’s a huge price range among shotgun mics, running from under fifty dollars for a cheaper mid-range model into the thousands for professional rigs. If you work with video often, then a more expensive microphone may be worth the investment.

First off, a higher quality shotgun microphone will get you much more advanced performance. You’ll get longer battery life, a more secure shock mount system, and a higher degree of adjustability and range. You can also expect more extra included accessories with pricier packages—like fur muffs, foam windscreen, and longer connector cables. Plus, all those pricier materials will make for a sturdier body, and a sturdier body means less interference from camera shake and vibration.

It’s sometimes worthwhile to invest in a more expensive shotgun microphone, especially if you shoot video frequently or simply want to step up your videography game. You won’t believe the increase in quality that you’ll get over in-body mics or cheaper models!

Rankings & Reviews

Below, we’ll be detailing some of the things that we like—and don’t like—about each shotgun microphone we ranked.

You’ll see rankings for qualities like range, size and weight, ease of use, build quality, and battery life.

Of all the shotgun DSLR microphones that we tested, this one was far and away our favorite.

A higher-end model from Rode’s extremely popular VideoMic line, the Pro offers a plethora of awesome features without detracting from its ultimate goal: delivering absolutely stellar audio.

Ultra compact and lightweight, with a sturdy mounting system to reduce transference, the VideoPro excels at providing rich, crystal clear audio in less than ideal conditions.

In reality, the choice is simple. If you’re in the market for a shotgun mic that’s intuitive to use and delivers consistently excellent performance in the field, this is your best bet.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers were full of praise for the Pro’s practical performance, saying that it captured professional quality audio even in difficult conditions like crowded events and outdoor settings.

It earned high marks for general build quality, its light weight, and its overall compact design. Many reviewers reported that the Pro does a great job at masking out both atmospheric and camera motor noise.

Overall, the VideoMic is a hit among event videographers, filmmakers, and hobbyists alike.

What’s good?

For starters, the VideoMic Pro features incredible durability in a lightweight and manageable package. It’s also easy to use right out of the box.

An innovative new shock mounting system as well as a 2-step high pass filter work to reduce background noise, ensuring that you get clear, interference-free audio every single time.

And with its broadcast-quality condenser capsule, which captures audio from the front while filtering out noise from the sides and rear, theVideoMic focuses on exactly what you’re focusing on.

To seal the deal, the Pro can operate for 70 hours on a single 9-volt battery, giving you the freedom to shoot for days without interruption.

What could be better?

Our only complaint about the VideoMic Pro has to do with the quality of its materials, which are lower in places than you’d expect at this price point.

In particular, the battery door is a bit flimsy and requires some caution to operate without breaking it.

Its mic jack cable is also thinner and weaker than we’d like. If you’re not prepared to take proper care of your equipment, then the Pro isn’t for you.

How does it compare in value?

For the price, the VideoMic Pro truly is one of the best deals currently on the market. It’s on the higher end of Rode’s product line, but its features and performance completely justify the cost.

You could spend a similar amount on other shotgun mics for your DSLR, but few deliver the same crisp, clear audio that you’ll get from the Pro.

You can get similar results from professional equipment that runs at many times the cost—in our book, that makes the VideoMic Pro a steal!

How has it improved?

Rode has done a great job of expanding their ever-popular VideoMic line, and the Pro is a fantastic step into the higher end of shotgun mic performance.

Its most marked improvement is in its shock mounting system, which is more efficient than ever and does a superb job at minimizing transference and background noise.

Plus, the Pro now includes a lightweight, durable premium cable that improves audio quality while reducing transference from camera shake.

If you’re looking for a sturdy, dependable shotgun mic that can shoot for weeks on end and still deliver premium quality audio, then the MKE 400 might be your best bet.

What reviewers say about it

The MKE is a huge success with users, who report that it coaxes clear, undistorted audio from DSLRs that have less than stellar on-board mics.

They also raved about the MKE’s small footprint in comparison to other models on the market, saying that it was useful without being intrusive or bulky.

All in all, the MKE 400 comes highly recommended from pros and amateurs alike. Everyone has great things to say about its build quality, impressive battery life, and ease of use.

What’s good?

One of the MKE’s most useful features is the inclusion of two separate recording modes for long and short distances. It’s easy to toggle the mic’s sensitivity based on proximity to your subject, so you’ll never be stuck just out of range again.

With a rugged mic jack cable and all-metal housing, the MKE is built to stand up to any conditions you can throw at it.

An integrated shock mount does a great job getting rid of any noise in the background or off your camera, while a foam shield protects the mic from wind and other outdoor elements.

In addition, the MKE 400 has absolutely fantastic battery life: running 300 hours on one AAA battery, it beats all the competition for longevity.

What could be better?

Like many of the other shotgun mics on this list, the MKE does suffer from breakage issues in some parts of its body.

The rubber connections of the shock mount and the windshield are weak spots, so be prepared to exercise extra care with those parts.

Additionally, many of these parts are difficult to replace if they break. As with any piece of camera equipment, you’ll need to be cautious with the MKE 400.

How does it compare in value?

Coming in at about the same price as the Rode VideoMic Pro, we think that the MKE delivers a similar performance.

What you get with the Sennheiser is improved battery life and more durable build quality, both important assets for the videographer who shoots day in and day out and still expects stellar performance.

All in all, we think that the MKE’s many features and impressive quality set it far above its competition in value.

How has it improved?

Some massive improvements that Sennheiser has added to the MKE 400 include its battery life and switchable sensitivity, two features that greatly increase the mic’s general functionality.

With its ultra-sleek metal body, the MKE 400 is also much more compact and lightweight than previous similar models, so you get similar performance without the bulk.

If you’re in the market for a rugged, impressively functional DSLR mic, then give the MKE 400 a shot—it’s one of our favorites out there.

This nifty little offering from Sharkk earns a place in our top three for its incredible value for money.

Compact and extremely usable, the Sharkk impressed us with its blend of affordability, adjustability, and ease of use.

It’s perfect for the DSLR user who’s just starting to dip their toes into videography and wants to see a fantastic improvement for a very reasonable investment.

You won’t get a better quality, more durable mic at this price point. So if you’re looking for the ultimate bang for your buck, go with the Sharkk.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers concur that the Sharkk is a wonderful value, with many offering praise for its significant improvement over in-body DSLR audio recording.

In particular, the Sharkk received praise for its solid audio quality, its great minimization of distortion, and its stylish look.

It was also popular for its ease of use, with many reviewers reporting that it’s very easy to install and operates simply and efficiently.

What’s good?

The Sharkk has a simple but elegant design that gives it a professional look, but it’s also very sturdy and tethers securely to your camera.

With an adjustable pickup pattern, you can toggle to 90 degree mode if you’re looking to capture audio off a specific subject, then back to 120 degree mode when you want to pick up ambient sound off a scene.

Its Mid-Side audio system picks up sound easily and naturally, so you’re sure to always get professional results.

And since it’s fully compatible with Nikon, Canon, Pentax, and Olympus systems, it’s sure to fit into your rig with no problem.

What could be better?

The Sharkk’s biggest weakness is its lack of some of the more advanced mounting features you might find on other shotgun mics.

It’s also very small, and its range isn’t as extensive as the pricier models on the market.

So if you’re looking for professional-level performance, then you may want to opt for a more expensive piece of equipment.

How does it compare in value?

This is the least expensive of our top three picks, by a mile. But we still believe that as far as value is concerned, the Sharkk offers a high enough level of quality to put it on par with more expensive models.

For the low price, the Sharkk doesn’t have some of the same advanced features of the other shotgun mics on this list, and it’s much smaller.

But if you’re looking for something affordable that will give you great results, it’s definitely worth a look.

How has it improved?

Sharkk is well known for offering quality products at bargain prices, but they’ve stepped up their game with this microphone.

In particular, we love the Sharkk’s adjustable pickup patterns. It really does make it easy to tailor the mic’s performance to your shooting situation.

Manfrotto’s patented leg angle adjustors are also a welcome development, adding a range of versatility to the model, while the new leg locks also provide increased stability.

Portable and easy to use, this offering from Rode is a winner in the lightweight category. Though you’ll sacrifice some features, it’s the best choice for the DSLR videographer who needs to travel light and fast.

What reviewers say about it

Of all the shotgun mics on this list, the GO got some of the best reviewer feedback overall.

Reviewers were full of praise for the GO’s sturdy construction, incredibly light weight, and affordable price tag. They also loved the shock mount, saying that it provided fantastic stability.

What’s good?

The GO really does live up to its name. It runs on stored power rather than batteries, so just charge it up overnight and you’re good to shoot all day long.

Plus, the integrated Rycote shock mount isolates the GO from all the pesky bumps and vibrations that could potentially ruin your audio.

Rode doesn’t make a lighter, more compact shotgun mic, so if you’re looking for a high-quality product that won’t weigh you down—then this is it.

What could be better?

All that portability comes with a price: the GO just isn’t going to give you the same results as some of Rode’s more expensive products.

In particular, the GO suffers in proximity to electronics because of its lack of a electromagnetic field.

Packed with features and extras yet still coming in at under $100, we think this bargain from Polsen is an absolute steal. It’s small enough to be convenient, but efficient enough to be the only shotgun mic you’ll need.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers absolutely loved the VMS-1080! In particular, they praised its durability and compatibility with a range of cameras.

They also liked the Polsen’s adjustable high-pass filter, which they said offered a great deal of flexibility in different kinds of shooting conditions.

What’s good?

With a matched pair of stereo condenser capsules and a switchable high-pass filter, the VMS-1080 comes well equipped to capture exactly what you need to capture and filter out exactly what you don’t.

In addition, its impressive collection of extras—a foam windscreen, shock mount, and fur wind cover—you’ll be able to easily minimize background noise.

What could be better?

Unlike a lot of shotgun mics on this list, the Polsen doesn’t have an in-body shock mount: it’s an add-on. That could be a problem when shooting in difficult conditions.

It’s also significantly heavier than many other mics, so if traveling light is a priority this may not be the one for you.

Yet another offering from Rode! This sleek, ultra-compact model is perfect for capturing everything from interviews to sports.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers had high praise for the VideoMicro’s Rycote shock mount, reporting that it did an excellent job handling bumps and camera vibrations.

They also praised the general audio quality, saying that it was natural and crisp. Many reviewers noted that the VideoMicro is one of the smartest audio investments they’ve made.

What’s good?

With a professional-looking compact body and an innovative shock mount, the VideoMicro is one of Rode’s most easy-to-use models. Regardless, it delivers consistently excellent audio without ever getting in the way.

It’s also very durable. An aluminum casing resists the weather, while the rugged shock mount stands up to any bumps and scrapes.

What could be better?

The VideoMicro doesn’t do a great job of filtering out camera motor noise, so consider that when making your purchase.

It’s also a directional mic, so it won’t capture the audio from an entire scene well.

This offering from Neewer is also a fantastic option. With a durable construction and plenty of accessories, the NW-597 produces solid audio on a budget.

What reviewers say about it

The NW-598 was well-received, with most reviewers saying that it provided decent quality audio, and that the included accessories were very effective at reducing ambient noise.

Reviewers also responded positively to the Neewer’s reasonable price, which is well below most models on the market.

What’s good?

The NW-598 does a generally good job of balancing audio, giving you a clear, focused sound that’s perfect for interviews.

Plus, the included windscreen muff helps to minimize ambient noise so you can focus on the audio that really matters.

What could be better?

Unfortunately, the lower price point comes with its own cost. The Neewer is much heavier and bulkier than most other models, and its audio isn’t in the same class as some of the higher-quality options on this list.

To top off the list, here’s another extremely affordable mid-range model. Though it comes in at a much cheaper price than other models, it still delivers a wide range of features and a very solid performance.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers had high praise for the Beeiee’s shockproof design, saying that it does a good job of filtering out camera noise.

They also loved its metal shell design and polished, professional appearance.

What’s good?

With a sensitivity adjustment feature and low frequency attenuation, you can always tailor the Beeiee’s performance to your shooting situations.

What could be better?

The Beeiee doesn’t have the build quality or the sturdiness of many pricier models, and it does suffer from some buzzing and hissing.

For the price, however, it’s still a fantastic buy!

Wrap Up

In conclusion, we believe that the Rode VideoMic Pro is the best shogun mic you can currently buy for your DSLR. It has all the features you could possibly need, delivers incredible performance, and wraps everything up in a compact, portable, and very affordable package.

If the Rode doesn’t suit your needs, however, you have plenty of other excellent options. In particular, the Sennheiser MKE 400 is a fantastic choice for the adrenaline junkie or travel videographer who prioritizes ruggedness and longevity in their equipment. Sharkk’s Beginner Camera Microphone also fits the bill perfectly for beginning videographers who want a quality piece of equipment without a very large investment.

Hopefully, this list has helped you to choose the best recording mic for your next video shoot!

]]>https://photophique.com/best-shotgun-microphones/feed/1Nikon D3300 vs Nikon D3200https://photophique.com/nikon-d3300-vs-nikon-d3200/
https://photophique.com/nikon-d3300-vs-nikon-d3200/#respondWed, 07 Mar 2018 17:50:10 +0000https://photophique.com/?p=11812Nikon is well known for incrementally improving their existing cameras rather than doing a complete overhaul with each new launch. This is something that is easily seen with the D3300. When comparing the Nikon D3300 vs Nikon D3200 the differences are subtle but noticeable. Compared to the D3200, the D3300 comes with more than a…

]]>Nikon is well known for incrementally improving their existing cameras rather than doing a complete overhaul with each new launch. This is something that is easily seen with the D3300. When comparing the Nikon D3300 vs Nikon D3200 the differences are subtle but noticeable.

Compared to the D3200, the D3300 comes with more than a few new improvements. As to which is better? That certainly goes to the D3300. But, if you’re on a budget, the D3200 is still a worthy camera for the beginner photographer.

To explain why we’ll be breaking down the differences between each camera and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each. As you’ll see they may look and seem very similar at first, but as they say the devil is in the details.

Nikon D3300: Advantages

On first comparing the specs between the D3300 and D3200 you’ll see that they both have the same 24.2MP APC-C sensor and the same 11-point AF setup. It’s easy to assume, then, that photos would come out the same with both – but the D3300 comes with one important difference.

With the 3300, Nikon has removed the optical anti-aliasing filter. This filter is installed in DSLR cameras to reduce optical aberrations – unwanted objects appearing on images that feature repetitive detail patterns. While anti-aliasing filters can reduce this effect, the downside is a loss in sharpness. It’s now common for most manufacturers to remove this filters in favor of optimal sharpness, relying instead on a higher megapixel count to cope with unwanted effects.

The improvements don’t stop there. The D3300 also comes with a new Expeed 4 image processing engine, which allows for a higher ISO sensitivity and faster shooting rate. While the D3200 featured a maximum ISO of 6400, the D3300 goes up to 12,800. The DSLR also comes with a few new automatic flash modes

Other new features include the option to attach the Nikon GP-1 module to a socket on the side of the camera so you can geotag your images. You also get a few new shooting modes such as Rangefinder mode, Mirror Lockup (though only for sensor cleaning, not when shooting) and Panorama mode which easily stitches several images together for one sweeping panorama.

Other than all that, most of the camera remains the same from the D3200. An 11-point AF setup, a 3-inch 921K-dot rear screen, and a 420-pixel RGB sensor metering system. All features that previous owners of the D3200 will find very familiar.

Nikon D3300: Disadvantages

A slight difference that previous owners of the D3200 will notice with the D3300 is the kit lens. It’s been redesigned to reduce the size and make it more compact. Nikon claims that the new lens is 30% smaller and 25% lighter than its predecessor. This is certainly a good thing, but the fact that they’ve chosen to keep the 11-point AF system means it still carries some of the disadvantages of the D3200.

When you’ve got plenty of light it doesn’t present a problem, but in low light it can be tricky to work with. If you’re shooting landscape and want the focus point on the edge of the screen, you’ll need to switch to manual focusing. The ring on the kit lens is quite small and fiddly, so if you tend to use manual focus a lot you’d be better getting a different lens.

In terms of image quality, the D3300 is a little disappointing. At ISO 400, color noise begins to creep into the shadow areas, which is surprising since you shouldn’t really notice noise until ISO 800. Once you do reach ISO 800, noise becomes quite noticeable in the midtones and even more in the shadow areas. The D3300 does come with a noise reduction system to combat this, but that comes at the cost of reduced sharpness.

Nikon 3200: Advantages

The Nikon D3200 may be aging, but it still holds up as a great entry level DSLR. Previous users of the D3100 will see a drastic improvement in its sensor, 24.2MP compared to 14.2MP, and its image processor, Expeed 3 compared to Expeed 2. This puts it in the same league at the D3300 with the exception of the image processor (Expeed 4 on the D3300).

For those who are new to DSLR’s, the D3200 comes with some very helpful features to get you started. An improved ‘Guide mode’ provides illustrative advice on what settings to choose along with shooting advice, all posted on the side of the screen. The idea is to give beginner DSLR users practical advice on how to get the most out of every situation.

While this is no substitute for some training on technique, the Guide mode does present some helpful advice for those who’ve never handled a DSLR before. Once you got the hang of its basic settings you can then make the switch to its more advanced modes like aperture priority, shutter priority or even full manual.

For a DSLR, the D3200 is not especially heavy and the build quality in on par with other DSLR’s in the same price range. However, the seals do not have weather or dust proofing so care needs to be taken when using it in adverse conditions.

The high image quality means you can print big or crop small without much loss in detail. Its light metering is exceptionally accurate and thanks to its large APS-C sensor you can capture a wider dynamic range than with previous models.

Where the D3200 really shines against the D3300 is in noise control. Between ISO 100 and 800 images come out especially clean. Noise does start to creep in between ISO 1600 and 3200, especially at the shadow areas, but you can still get good results. After ISO 3200 things start to go downhill fast which can only be expected with an entry-level DSLR.

Nikon D3200: Disadvantages

Guide mode will only ever take you so far

No internal AF motor

Some minor issues with monitor control

Both the D3300 and D3200 are quite similar in some of their disadvantages such as no Wi-Fi connectivity, no image stabilization, no top-deck display and no tilt-swivel screen. The D3200 also has a lower Expeed of 3 compared to 4, meaning a slightly reduced ISO sensitivity and shooting rate.

The Guide mode is also quite limited in what it can do which is both a strength and a weakness. Meaning that it’s easy to follow and helpful in basic situations, but won’t be much help in more difficult lighting or shooting styles.

This is also the case with the menu layout, easy to use but basic. First time DSLR users will have no trouble finding their way around, but it’s lacking in customizable features that are found in more sophisticated DSLRs.

Verdict

Usually, when one camera model follows another it’s expected to be an improvement over its predecessor. That is certainly the case between the D3200 and D3300, but not on every point. The higher image processor of the D3300 means you have a far higher range of ISO usage and a faster 5fps on continuous shooting mode. Couple this with sharper photos and extra settings, such as panorama mode, and it’s a nice step up from its predecessor.

However, despite having more ISO sensitivity and sharper photos, it’s the D3200 which has better noise reduction. If you often shoot on a high ISO this is worth taking into account as the D3300 was surprisingly noisy past ISO 800.

All taken together though, the D3300 is the better camera. If you can afford the extra cash it’s well worth it, but the D3200 is still a worthy DSLR in its own right.

]]>https://photophique.com/nikon-d3300-vs-nikon-d3200/feed/010 Best Wrist Straps for Your DSLR of 2018https://photophique.com/best-dslr-wrist-straps/
https://photophique.com/best-dslr-wrist-straps/#respondWed, 07 Mar 2018 17:30:49 +0000http://photophique.com/?p=5055You’re probably used to carrying your camera around your neck. The neck strap is the most common way to secure a DSLR, and while it’s certainly a great way to keep your camera secure, it’s not the only one. Recently, wrist straps have been gaining popularity as a more comfortable, less hazardous way to secure…

You’re probably used to carrying your camera around your neck. The neck strap is the most common way to secure a DSLR, and while it’s certainly a great way to keep your camera secure, it’s not the only one.

Recently, wrist straps have been gaining popularity as a more comfortable, less hazardous way to secure a camera. They’re perfect for adventure and sport photographers who are always on the go, but work well for anyone who needs to keep their camera secure and accessible all the time.

There are a lot of fantastic, inexpensive DSLR wrist straps out there today, but we particularly loved the durable Cuff model from Peak Design.

It offers tough build quality and every feature you could possibly need in a wrist support strap, while looking great and not breaking the budget. Overall, the Cuff is the best value out there.

What to Look for in a Wrist Strap

If you choose your wrist strap carefully, it can give you support for years to come. But that requires doing some research and knowing what you’re looking for. With that in mind, here are some of the most important features you should be on the lookout for:

Durability: This is the most important element of a camera strap, by far. You need something that is well constructed and won’t break down over time.

Bulkiness: You don’t want to be handcuffed to an ungainly, cumbersome piece of equipment, so choose something strong but streamlined.

Comfort: Since the strap is sitting up against your skin, you’ll want to find something that feels comfortable and non-abrasive there.

Materials: This relatively inexpensive strap will be holding up thousands of dollars worth of precious equipment, so look for materials that are up to the task.

What to Expect When Spending More

Most DSLR wrist straps are fairly inexpensive, so you won’t have to worry about breaking the bank. However, you may want to spring for a more expensive model if you have a higher-end camera to support.

To begin with, a more expensive strap is generally going to be made from higher quality materials. Expect neoprene or leather in place of cheaper nylon. A larger investment will also buy you either a more durable, heavy-duty strap or an ultra-lightweight one, depending on your needs. You can also expect to find more intelligent construction, with features like quick-release locks and more advanced support structures.

It may be very worthwhile for you to invest in a higher-quality wrist strap, especially if you do a lot of shooting outdoors or in other hazardous conditions. You don’t want to be carrying around a pricey camera on a cheap, flimsy strap. A few extra dollars could mean the difference between a small inconvenience and a major disaster.

Rankings & Reviews

In the rankings below, we’ll be breaking down exactly what we did and didn’t love about each of the wrist straps.

We’ve ranked them for durability, comfort, size and weight, flexibility, and cost.

Streamlined and incredibly comfortable, built from materials that will stand up to any test, the Cuff is ready for the toughest challenges you can throw its way.

If you’re in the market for a wrist strap that you can trust to secure your gear without hampering your shoot, then you can’t go wrong with the Peak Design Cuff.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers loved the Cuff’s unobtrusive, low profile design, saying that it provides perfect support without weighing down the hand or getting in the way.

It earned high marks for its build quality, ease of use, and clever design. Reviewers were particularly impressed that they could easily manage the Cuff one-handed!

All in all, the Cuff is vastly popular for its full-featured usability and performance. A few reviewers even say that they’ve used it in place of a standard shoulder strap.

What’s good?

The Cuff is easy to snap into place—with just one quick click of its Secure-Lock buckle, your camera is instantly tethered onto your wrist.

Once it’s in place, the seatbelt-strength material keeps your camera firmly attached to your wrist, while an adjustable cinch allows you to customize its fit to your hand.

And with durable Dyneema anchors that automatically alert you to wear and tear on the Cuff, you can trust that it’s giving your camera the support it needs. Plus, it’s compatible with nearly every camera out there.

When not in use, the Cuff stores easily and unobtrusively as a bracelet. You’ll never be left without it when that perfect shot appears!

What could be better?

We don’t have many complaints about the Cuff, but its size could potentially be an issue for some users.

While the Cuff is typically storable as a bracelet, it may be too tight to do so comfortably if you have wider wrists, so keep that in mind.

In addition, that secure fit might be overly snug during normal operation as well, for users with large hands.

How does it compare in value?

For its price, the Peak Design Cuff is one of the best values on the market. Its durable materials will stand up to a lot of abuse, so you’re making a great long-term investment.

Plus, the Cuff comes with Peak Design’s lifetime warrantee, so even if something does go wrong you’re still covered.

It’s a little pricier than some of the entries on this list, but still incredibly affordable. And if you’re looking for real quality, it’s the best that there is.

How has it improved?

Peak Design has approached the structure of the Cuff very thoughtfully, and that time spent on design pays off.

The biggest improvement over past models is the redesigned quick-release locks. Since they cut down on operation time drastically, they’re a fantastic addition to this model.

In addition, the secure anchoring mechanism is unique among other wrist straps, and really enhances our confidence in the Cuff’s performance. s

Need a wrist strap that can stand up to tough conditions without letting up on performance or comfort? Consider this offering from Rapid Fire.

It’s priced below many of the wrist straps on the market today, but still delivers dependable performance due to its high-quality materials.

You’ll never have to worry about an accidental drop again with the Heavy Duty’s durable construction and secure locking mechanisms.

No matter what your camera or subject may be, the Heavy Duty offers premium performance at a bargain price.

What reviewers say about it

The Heavy Duty is a hit with reviewers everywhere, who love its quick release mechanism and sturdy, ultra-light design.

Reviewers also raved about the Heavy Duty’s adjustability, saying that it gave them the comfort to shoot exactly how they wanted to.

They praised the construction and materials as well. The comfortable neoprene earned high marks for its cushioning properties and resistance to stretching.

What’s good?

One of the most useful things about the Heavy Duty is its adaptability. You get two connection heads for the price of one: a heavyweight strap for your DSLR, and a slimmer one for GoPros or point-and-shoots.

Its Quick Release mechanism is specifically designed to increase wrist mobility, so you’ll always be able to maneuver for that perfect shot.

Plus, the Heavy Duty’s durable neoprene adapts to your wrist for ultimate comfort while still giving your camera the support that it needs.

It even comes with a bonus microfiber cleaning cloth that’s safe to use on all your lenses and other equipment!

What could be better?

Similarly to the Peak Design Cuff, the Heavy Duty has some issues with size.

Make sure to double-check its measurements before purchasing, because a few reviewers reported that it fit a little too snugly across their wrists.

Other than that, we don’t have too many negative things to say about the Heavy Duty.

How does it compare in value?

Even though it’s in our top three, this strap is still one of the most inexpensive entries on this list. We think that says a lot about the Heavy Duty’s value for money.

With its high-quality materials and excellent design, the Heavy Duty delivers exactly what you want from a wrist strap without the hefty price tag.

At well under $20, the Heavy Duty is a total steal. It blows away all the competition at its price point.

How has it improved?

Rapid Fire has done an admirable job crafting an excellent product at a very reasonable price point. This isn’t the cheap, flimsy strap of the past.

After-market straps used to be notorious for their weak connection heads, but the Heavy Duty’s features really live up to its name. They’re sturdier than past models—and you get two of them!

If you’re looking for a wrist strap that delivers a pitch-perfect balance between value and dependability, then this model does a better job than almost anything else out there.

To top off the list, here’s another extremely affordable mid-range model. Though it comes in at a much cheaper price than other models, it still delivers a wide range of features and a very solid performance.

What reviewers say about it

Reviewers had high praise for the ProMaster, enjoying its extensive length and cushioned, comfortable strap.

However, some were displeased with its size, and said it was smaller than they anticipated.

What’s good?

With an Easy Clip lock that holds your camera securely in place and a wide, comfortably thick strap that holds snugly to your arm, the ProMaster does a good job of

It has a longer strap than most of the entries on this list, which could come in handy if you’re looking for something a little more low-key.

What could be better?

As mentioned above, the ProMaster still fits some wrists a little too snugly despite its length.

Wrap Up

In conclusion, we believe that the Peak Design Cuff Is the best wrist strap on the market for your DSLR today. It’s slim without being flimsy, strong without being bulky, and functional without getting in the way of your shoot.

If the Peak Design doesn’t suit your needs, however, you won’t be at a loss for other stylish, functional options. The Rapid Fire Heavy Duty is also a fantastic option for the photographer who doesn’t want to be encumbered by a large or inflexible strap. It’s adjustable, lightweight, and surprisingly tough. The Black Rapid doesn’t disappoint either. With its extreme light weight, cushy neoprene construction, and streamlined silhouette, it’s perfect for the active nature photographer.

We hope that this list has helped you to decide which of the many excellent DSLR wrist straps on the market today will best suit your needs!