By far the most secret and least accountable operation of the federal government is not, as one might expect, the CIA, the DIA, or some other super-secret intelligence agency. The CIA and other intelligence operations are under control of Congress. They are accountable: A Congressional committee supervises these operations, controls their budgets, and is informed of their covert activities.

The Federal Reserve, however, is accountable to no one; is has now budget; it is subject to no audit; and no Congressional committee knows of, or can truly supervise, its operations. The Federal Reserve, virtually in total control of the nation’s monetary system, is accountable to nobody.

America’s Founding Fathers held a deep distrust of centralized banking. Before long, we may find out why, first-hand, for ourselves.

I’m still trying to get my head around what the hell is going on, but best I can tell is that Colonel Klink, social climber that he is, has somehow lifted himself from an obscure commandant of Stalag-13 to the very highest levels of the American military industrial complex.

Seriously though, I’ve spent a good chunk of the last two days trying to get a better handle on what’s really happening. As someone who, until just about a week ago, knew virtually nothing of American or international finance, I’m the first to admit that I have no idea what I’m talking about. That said, here’s my take on it all; oddly enough much of which can best be summarized via this tiff between Naomi Klein and Andrew Sullivan:

I think they both might just be right. Certainly an administration that relies on shock doctrine to achieve it’s goals could leverage a generation of Americans raised on the concept of credit as money — after all, “Life takes Visa” doesn’t it? — to engineer a self-imposed financial disaster.

What if the current administration colluded with the likes of Goldman Sachs to setup mortgage packages that were difficult to trace and, more importantly, doomed to fail.

What if these mortgages were promoted as part of an ownership society, a get-rich concept sold to an American public that grew up on credit and believing in the words of Gordon Gekko: that somehow greed “will save that malfunctioning corporation called the USA.”

In other words, what if the current administration set out with the intent of producing a — this — disastrous event as a means of furthering an agenda?

As it only transfers deltas between source and destination files, rsync is a great backup tool when working with uncompressed data. The structure of compressed data, however, can change drastically between backups, defeating the benefits of rsync. I’d read somewhere recently, however, that bzip2’s “blocking” design might make it a viable compression to use with rsync. Ran an ad hoc experiment this morning to check this out.

Uncompressed Data

Here are the results from rsync’ing an uncompressed MySQL database with a few minor record changes.
total: matches=1634 hash_hits=2136 false_alarms=0 data=21227
sent 6.73K bytes received 9.92K bytes 6.66K bytes/sec
total size is 2.69M speedup is 161.44

Nice. Only about 7K transferred. Roughly the size of the change.

bzip2 Compressed Data

And here are the results from rsync’ing the same MySQL database, compressed in advance with bzip2.
total: matches=596 hash_hits=17533 false_alarms=1 data=876602
sent 876.99K bytes received 7.73K bytes 353.89K bytes/sec
total size is 1.64M speedup is 1.85

Woah! What amounts to about a 7K change is resulting 10x the data transfer.

Which makes sense, as — digging into the details of bzip2 — I see that the bzip2 algorithm chunks data in 100K – 900k blocks. So I suppose that using bzip2 might make sense if you have an incrementally growing data store that adds about 100K of data between backups; and where the older data rarely, if ever, changes. Barring that, to achieve the benefits of rsync, uncompressed data is probably the way to go.

That said, there seems to be a version of gzip with an --rsyncable switch for Debian. The BeezNest has a great article on this here.

Yes, while I’m for saving the planet and all, I think that the makers of planet-friendly, biogegradable, flushable gDiapers should have a large warning on the box: May cause toilet to explode at 3am.

Granted, it’s my fault for not reading the instructions. But then again, I’m a guy. A guy with a baby. Like I’m going to read diaper instructions. If not a warning, the gDiaper people should at least be guy-conscious/guy-friendly and include a picture on the box indicating that the included swizzle stick is for helping the diaper break apart in water; not for ramming vast quantities of diaper down the nether regions of the toilet.

A simple drawing of an angry diaper-prodding guy with a big slash through it would suffice.