I'm enjoying this conversation but I have to go home soon. You know, the 6:20 thing, can't break a law of the universe...

Seriously, you are offering some criticism I've been wanting to hear for some time now. It's not so much that I believe the things I'm saying as much as I can't find what's wrong with them. I'd like you to ponder on a particular issue, which embodies the essence of my argument:

You cannot create a dichotomy that separates science from the rest of our experience

But I can! I can argue that you need language to do and experience science, but you don't need language for most of our interaction with the world.