Comparisons to Europe in "Of Cannibals"

In his essay "Of Cannibals," Michel de Montaigne relies heavily on the
technique of comparing and contrasting Western society with a band of
natives that practice cannibalism. He criticizes what he sees as social
flaws -- "treachery, disloyalty, tyranny and cruelty"-- and expresses outrage
at society's acceptance of these "ordinary vices." (5)

His arguments are logical and eloquent. At times he is brutally direct
in his social critique. His initial comments seem more metaphorical and not
so pointed. When Montaigne says, "really it is those that we have changed
artificially and led astray from the common order that we should rather call
wild," he is referring to what he thinks of as the Western world's
adultrated values. (2) He then goes on to contrast his society with native
life. He lists the vices of his people that are absent in the natives'
culture: "there is no sort of traffic, no knowledge of letters, no science
of numbers, no name for a magistrate or for political superiority, no custom
of servitude, no riches or poverty, no contracts, no successions, no
partitions, no occupations but leisure ones, no care for any but common kin,
no clothes, no agriculture, no mental, no use of wine or wheat." (3) In
their culture, "the very words that signify lying, treachery, dissimulation,
avarice, envy, belittling, pardon - unheard of." (3) Rather, they are a
culture that values "valor against the enemy and love for their wives"- in
other words, honor and familial devotion.

As the essay continues, Montaigne's words grow overtly harsher and his
argument more complex. He debunks the former assumption that natives are
completely innocent and pure, when he reveals the reason for their
cannibalism: "This is not, as many people think, for nourishment... it is to
betoken an extreme revenge." (4) He uses this appalling knowledge to
illustrate how much worse his own culture is, by describing the torture
Westerners inflict on their own enemies, adopting the natives' view that
Westerners are "much greater masters than themselves in every sort of
wickedness" (4). He lambasts his people, saying, "So we may well call these
people barbarians, in respect to the rules of reason, but not in respect to
ourselves, who surpass them in every kind of barbarity." (5)

Reading Questions

What function do the Atlantis and Aristotle examples serve to further
Montaigne's argument against Western notions of barbarism? Why does he
include them so early in the piece, before he touches on his main
points?

What are Montaigne's motives for his explanation of "clever people" and
their tendency to alter facts to better support their arguments? (2) Does
this revelation/admission help or hinder his credibility as a wisdom
speaker?