If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Sandusky (and Dorothy) Future

"State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. filed the suit in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Thursday, arguing that the homeowner's policy issued to the retired Penn State assistant football coach does not cover claims for injuries covered by intentional acts."

Mike Dawson @MikeDawsonCDT 3m
Just saw Dottie #Sandusky after having lunch in Bellefonte. Tearing up, she said, "I love my husband" and "he is not who they say he is."

Let me preface this by saying that I work for PSU and have been livid since last fall. I'm amazed I still have a job. And not had a stroke.

As to Dottie - I think there's something seriously wrong with her. Beyond covering up hideous crimes. She has a genuine mental defect, IMO. I'd like to see what a licensed psychiatrist would say after interviewing her.

I don't know if she was always this way or if living with the predator messed her up - and neither excuses her behavior - but something seems terribly terribly off.

It appears that she separated from reality decades ago and she's not coming back. It's disturbing but fascinating.

There's no reason for anyone to stand by the kind of statements she continues to make, given all of the concrete evidence and live victims.

(Shout out to V2! Glad you stepped out!)

I'm wondering if she could be a danger to herself or others. She doesn't appear to understand reality. It's kinda scary.

Nothing is sacred, no one gets a pass.That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence ~ Hitchens

Let me preface this by saying that I work for PSU and have been livid since last fall. I'm amazed I still have a job. And not had a stroke.

As to Dottie - I think there's something seriously wrong with her. Beyond covering up hideous crimes. She has a genuine mental defect, IMO. I'd like to see what a licensed psychiatrist would say after interviewing her.

I don't know if she was always this way or if living with the predator messed her up - and neither excuses her behavior - but something seems terribly terribly off.

It appears that she separated from reality decades ago and she's not coming back. It's disturbing but fascinating.

There's no reason for anyone to stand by the kind of statements she continues to make, given all of the concrete evidence and live victims.

(Shout out to V2! Glad you stepped out!)

I'm wondering if she could be a danger to herself or others. She doesn't appear to understand reality. It's kinda scary.

A lot of older women who have been married for many years, like Dottie, live in a land of butterflies and unicorns where their pedophile husbands are falsely accused or were simply seduced by perverted teens and children. I've known many women like Dottie that fit that. She has had many years to create a image of an ideal marriage that she really believes. Anyone who challenges that is simply wrong.

...........Amendola said Sandusky has asked county jail officials to remove him from what is effectively solitary confinement.

"He continues to believe that the truth will come out at some point, and that he'll get another trial or another opportunity to establish his innocence," Amendola said.............

Amendola said he expects sentencing will occur in September, although a date has not been set. Sandusky, who did not testify on his own behalf during the trial, has been writing a statement to read to Judge John Cleland at sentencing that will address all 10 sets of charges.

"Whether he winds up doing it despite what I tell him, is going to be up to him," Amendola said. "It's his life."............

Also Wednesday, Cleland struck from the record a filing made by Sandusky co-counsel Karl Rominger last month that challenged an order by the judge designed to figure out if lawyers were leaking information to the media. Cleland's order on Wednesday, citing rules of legal procedure, gave Rominger three weeks to file a new version.

Rominger had argued Cleland's demand for a sworn statement listing all material he obtained from prosecutors and gave to third parties would violate protections for attorney work products. A call seeking comment from Rominger was not immediately returned.