Search This Blog

Friday, March 7, 2014

Palin crotch sniffer Joe Sheppard is retiring

This will be the last post for this site and my Governor Palin commentary site "Palin4president2016"After
6 years of activism for the conservative point of view, and especially
having had the honor of discussing Governor Palin I am retiring. I have
had a lifetime of political activity at various levels, an have been a
published author on political economy, a president of a political party I
well know that there comes a time when the field should be left to
those who are younger.I
don't regret a moment of my spirited support for Governor Palin and in
another age, and in a young mind and body, my support for George
McGovern! I was right then and am right now as history showed and will
show.I am dedicating my time to promoting my wife's new book; LINK: "The Shining Hours" and
am undertaking a work of my own which experience has shown has to have
full dedication. As for Governor Palin, I made it clear that this site
was always about promoting her as the GOP nominee but, if circumstances
or her own decision precluded that, the title of this blog could just as
well be "Palin in The Presidency 2016" as it is her ideas and ideals
that are at the core of my support which ideals transcend the person. I
set this out some time ago in a post reproduced below. I
will leave the two sites up as I note that many people search for and
read the older articles, and there are some university studies that show
Governor Palin was a plus for the McCain campaign which can be of value
to rebut critics.To
the +700,000 people of goodwill who viewed the two sites my sincere
thanks and to those, and of course to Governor Palin and her family I
extend my best wishes and regards*********************************************************************************Palin-ism In the PresidencySubsequent
to the Los Angeles Times major article proposing Sarah Palin as "the
Cure" for the GOP and it's suggestion that Palin may be an ideal
candidate for 2016there have been howls of derision from the left.That is
to be expected in Los Angeles of course, the unexpected however was the
article itself. Amongst the huge number of leftist criticisms was a
recurring theme that has been running for two years now. It has numerous
variants, but in sum if runs along these lines "Palin is an egotist/She
will drag out the "will she won't she" run game for four years whilst
getting suckers to send her money" and suchlike.Leaving aside that the decision to run for president is a momentous one, not only for a candidate but for their family.As Palin
knows, probably more than anyone. A merciless and unfair blowtorch is
immediately focused on the candidate and anyone associated with them.
Thus if Palin takes a long time to come to a decision, only
a poltroon would condemn her for that.The arrogance of the left is such that they consider that anyone who supports Sarahpac financially is a dumb sucker.Obviously
Palin supporters are well aware she may not run when they send money to
Sarahpac. They do know that the money will go towards supporting
candidates for office that Palin approves of. They also know it will not
go towards "supporting Palin's extravagant lifestyle" and other such
childish leftist idiocies.Those
who support Palin obviously would like her to run, but we obviously know
that she may not.When we support her, in the media, or financially, or
on the ground when her chosen candidates run we are supporting
Palin-ism. Obviously we would like to see Palin-ism put in to effect by
Palin herself, but if that is not to be, then seeing it effected by
people she supports will also do. For us it is money and time well
spent.The leftist cynics can simply go to hell.I addressed this matter before the Los Angeles Times article and reproduce it below as a supplement to the new commentary above.

This
site is not absolutely about Sarah Palin regardless of the Blog title.
Of course I, and I am sure a massive number of others, judging by her
Facebook followers being over 3 million, would wish her to run in 2016.But
Palin is only one person, and a person with massive family commitments,
especially with Trig of course. It may be that she has developed a
taste for the freedom from financial constraints and from media
criticism worries, and is happy to enjoy the rest of her life in comfort
and ease.If
so, good for her. Surely nobody else in public life has endured the
slings and arrows of outrageous leftism over the last four years and
would be entitled to such a respite as her skills and endurance has
gained for her.There
are of course many options for public involvement open to her. She will
be in demand as public speaker for some time yet as an historic figure
at least.The
currently Dem. held Alaskan senate seat is up for election in 2016, and
of course she can continue endorsing and campaigning for candidates she
considers it important to do so. Her influence as an endorser is
undiminished as e.g Ted Cruz in Texas will testify.But
even if none of these options appeal to her (which I doubt) this blog
would change from Palin4President2016 to "Palinism In The Presidency
2016". No matter how great or influential and correct a person's
political, social and economic ideas and ideals are, they will outlive
their originator if they have lasting value.The
"common sense conservatism" policies that Sarah Palin espouses and
exemplifies, are lasting if not timeless and will be her legacy no
matter what her personal future holds. An outline of what she, and this
site stands for areAT THIS LINK

Hey Joe my blog has been up for just over three years and I have close to 1,000,000 visitors. And that is ONE blog. Your blogs have been up for six years and between the two of them only 700,000 visitors? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

$carah has ideas? Apart from grifting, I wish he would name ONE. His wife should be ashamed of him, so openly worshipping another woman like this. Maybe he will move on to someone with substance - like Kim Kardasian!!

I guess it's fine with him that she supported ONE candidate with ONE measly $5000 check while she spent 100 times that on postage? Yeah, Joe, we're all wrong that she spends your money on herself. All wrong that she never intended to run, and it had nothing to do with "massive family commitments." And poor persecuted Sarah, who never says a mean or nasty word about Democrats, does she? God, this guy is as deranged as she is. And I hope his wife isn't using him as Editor of her book.

Sheppard wasn't a fun punching bag anymore. All of the remaining bots have also had the air punched out of them. What could they do? Blame the left and elites for Sarah's stuffed bra, embarrassing heels, and dirty wigs?