Prosfilaes has only been here a year, but he has been a boon to the community already. Most notably, and perhaps most visibly, in regards to our discussions of copyright violations, where he has providing very concise and clear information. He's also provided interpretation of copyright law, as well as doing research on renewals.

I believe that with the administrator tools he will prove to be even more useful to us. Therefore, I'd like to nominate him for adminship. Jude(talk) 09:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Amazingly Due and I had the same idea at a similar time. This is an excellent nomination. Prosfilaes has been participating in community discussions, both politely and considerately, additionally he is pretty good with the mop and bucket around patrolling, so I heartily believe that we should offer Prosfilaes the tools to allow him to empty the bucket and dry the mop. -- billinghurst (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I accept this nomination. I recognize Spangineer's concerns, and acknowledge that I have been known to get snippy when annoyed. I also recognize that adminstratorship demands a higher standard, one that I believe I can rise to.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support as common (de)nominator. -- billinghurst (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support. Are you two trying to beat me to the nom. now? John Vandenberg(chat) 10:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Regretfully oppose—This comment and a few similar exchanges leave a bad taste in my mouth. I opposed Eclecticology's reconfirmation because of incivility, and unfortunately I feel the need to oppose this nomination for the same reason. --Spangineerwp(háblame) 14:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that link's broken--it's currently showing up as something on the US Declaration of Independence... Jude(talk) 07:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)