I use the word possibilities because, as a seasoned journalist I understand how the media operates when it comes to covering negative abortion related stories: they don’t. I am probably dreaming that this new study revealing yet more fallout from abortion will see the light of day on-line, on the air, or in print in secular news circles. The pattern of a media blackout on certain topics continues regularly. Just this week, ABC News all but ignored what one would think would be a major attention grabber: an additional 43 lawsuits filed by dioceses and other Church related organizations over the HHS mandate requiring employers to cover contraception and sterilization in their insurance plans.

I hope I am pleasantly surprised, but in case I am not, I am asking everyone to share this story now for the good and well-being of all the women in your life. This new study comes from China, yes China. China’s been making headlines lately regarding the case of blind Chinese human rights activist Chen Guangcheng who recently sought asylum in the United States. Chen has been speaking out against China’s one child and forced abortion practices for years. As a result, he has been tortured and imprisoned and his family threatened. Despite his efforts to protect women and unborn children, the secular media have mostly described him as a “human rights advocate”. Little or no attention is given to the pro-life focus of his work. And now just days after he arrives here in this country this new study is released; a study conducted in China that shows more evidence of an abortion-breast cancer link.

The report, published in the Asian Pacific Journal of Breast Cancer Prevention, concluded that ‘compared with women who had no history of induced abortion, women with a previous induced abortion had a significant increased risk of breast cancer.” For older women there was an even higher breast cancer link.

The story angles and tie-ins are obvious. Here we have one of the most well known pro-life and human rights advocates on American soil. What does he stand for? Why did he have to seek help from the United States? He defended women who wanted their children and tried to stop the forced killing of their children in the womb. Wouldn’t it make perfect sense to follow up the latest developments in the case of Chen Guangcheng with a story, however brief, on this new study from China?

I’m not the only one who wants to shout “hello is any one listening?” The report has also caught the attention of Janet Morana, co-founder of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign. Silent No More is a ministry that reaches out to post abortion men and women and allows them, if they choose, to share their stories.

“This is a perfect time for a study that finds an abortion-breast cancer link to come out of China, while the world’s attention is still focused on the fate of forced abortion protester Chen Guangcheng. Perhaps it is time for an honest assessment of how this common surgical procedure-sold to American women and forced on unwilling Chinese women-is actually hurting all women.”

Speaking of studies, reports and surveys dating back more than 30 years show those working in most of our major newsrooms support legalized abortion. In a perfect world, a reporter’s opinion shouldn’t matter unless they are writing for the Op-Ed page. As Janet Morana said, it is indeed a perfect time but the world we live in along with the majority of the media, is far from perfect. So the possibilities of such an abortion related story getting coverage are unfortunately somewhere between slim and none.

So let’s make this study the news it ought to be. Spread the word: Guangcheng has arrived and so has further confirmation of a link between abortion and breast cancer.

One thought on “Another Study Links Breast Cancer & Abortion”

Are you sure it’s a link between abortion and breast cancer, and not a link between not-breastfeeding and breast cancer?

I am by no means an endocrine expert, but considering that the uterus and the breasts are on completely opposite ends of the human trunk, as it were, I see no reason that one should affect the other in such a way, UNLESS the reason abortion matters to breast cancer rates is because an ended pregnancy means there will be no lactation and no breastfeeding. Because even a pregnancy of two months’ duration is going to cause changes in the breast tissue.

If this *is* about lack of breastfeeding, then why aren’t you going after all the women who choose to dry up and use formula?

And if you don’t *know* whether it’s truly about lack of breastfeeding, and you *really* care about women’s lives, why aren’t you trying to find out?

You keep using that word, “feminism.” I do not think it means what you think it means.

P.S. The infant adoption industry? NOT FEMINIST. If your agenda is to provide it with more salable material, SHAME ON YOU.