The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.

Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?

Lehman Brothers gets a bail out

Would the 2008 financial crisis have spread as far and as wide if Lehman Brothers were bailed out. As their failure started the ball rolling and the dominos falling.

Bailed out by who is the question ? Some USG org

Question then becomes what if there are others. How many bailouts is USG to cope with here. Where to draw the line. They did eventually do it. Just wondering whether acting sooner would have helped or not.

or did it all happen too fast to act and in the end what transpired was the only option.

Here's the timeline, as indicated by financial institutions borrowings from the Fed. Bear in mind that the data go back to January 1919, and average about $350 million, with almost nothing ever over $1 billion, even during the S&L crisis.

Basically, no. The financial crisis did not start with Lehman and had grown progressively worse for years. We had been trying to address this with various one-off bailouts and expansions of Federal Reserve lending programs, but we continued to run into more crises, progressively larger and progressively faster.

AIG was running out of cash the same time as Lehman, for instance.

Bailing out Lehman would have been another one-off bailout which would NOT have solved the fear behind the financial crisis. We needed a large package for the ENTIRE financial system. That means TARP, the bank stress tests, and the various lending programs the Fed implemented. For the ENTIRE financial system.

In retrospect, we should have let Bear Stearns fail. We weren't going to get TARP unless the entire system was about to collapse, and it was bound to happen sooner or later. Might as well get the pain done earlier.

Reading the Bernanke memoir, a system-wide approach would have not been politically feasible. Came at the wrong time politically. According to Ben, they would've saved Lehman too, but they really didn't have the authority, because Lehman was fundamentally insolvent. The taxpayers would have lost billions of dollars lending into an unknowable black hole. They would've absolutely lent money had Lehman any assets to justify the loan.
They publicly stated that they Lehman fail because they thought if they said "we couldn't save Lehman" would've provoked instantaneous market collapse.

Last edited by GVChamp; 11 Jun 16, at 18:31.

"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood"-Otto Von Bismarck