Tuesday, July 29, 2014

"All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States (U.S. Const. I §1).... The Congress shall have Power... To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization (§8).... [The President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed (II §3)...."

S

ee? The "laws" are what His Man-Caused Disastersness™, Baracrook Øtyrant, is supposed to faithfully execute. Not any "rule."

So Congress can pass any comprehensive "rule" for reforming Demmigration® immigration it wants. His Lawlessness™ can even sign it. That doesn't mean he has to faithfully execute or enforce it.

Make no mistake: The Constitution says it's merely a rule, not a law. Therefore, it won't be enforced. Period. Full stop.

At least that's how His Constitutional Law Professorness™ sees it. He's been absolutely clear about that.

Apparently, Congress's strict prohibition against a president using the Internal Revenue Service to punish and harass his political enemies, and effectually abridge their free-speech rights before federal elections, is considered by His Dictatorshipness™ a "rule," too. Same with its prohibition against IRS officials destroying relevant evidence, such as "scratched" and "recycled" hard disk drives and all their back-ups, while Congress is investigating their abuses.

No doubt, His Enemy-Aider-and-Comforterness™ feels any "punishment" or "attainder" of treason, such as when a president unilaterally gives America's mortal enemies their top leaders back in exchange for a deserter defector who materially helped them kill our Troops, constitutes a lowly rule of Congress as well.

Evidently, His Keep-Your-Doctorness™'s own so-called Affordable so-called Care so-called Act also must be chock-full of these optionally enforceable "rules."

See how many things a president doesn't have to enforce once he deems each of them a "rule"? Yes he can get away with just failfully executing those.

“Rules are meant to be broken, and the laws don’t apply to everybody.”