Every guy in pickup is encouraged to take photo-op opportunities with hot girls whenever possible.

This is done largely for the reason of pre-selection: if girls see you in photos with other girls, they will assume that you’re a fun, sociable prize that lots of women want to get their paws on.

That is pre-selection theory in its simplest breakdown.

It is sort of a cheat code to attracting women.

Girls whom you would’ve picked up, merely wants to know/see that you’re a guy whom they can feel safe around.

If chicks are comfortable enough to be taking photos with you, then you must be somewhat of a safe guy, right?

Wrong.

However, that is how a woman’s brain rationalizes it.

She judges if you’re a safe guy to be around by whether you surround yourself with other women or not.

By appearing in numerous photos with numerous women, you give her that reassurance- that you’re a safe individual who is accepted by other women.

The opposite of the pre-selected guy is the loner.

Which girl is attracted to loners?

None!

How come?

Loners are weird and cannot be vouched for in order for the girl to discern whether he [the loner] is a safe chap or some serial killer in waiting.

Therefore, women deem loners as unattractive and unsafe.

She isn’t sure about him.

This is why when you’re in a nightclub or any nightlife environment, you want to be chatting up or chatting to various people: be they the bartenders [males and females], old ladies, drunk guy, etc.

This build “Social Proof”.

It let’s people around you know that you’re safe…even though you may very well be a serial rapist or some shit.

Perception is all that matters! And people will perceive you ‘safe to be around’ once they see others in your presence, conversing with you and so forth.

Hence, this is where the routine of “taking photos with women” comes in silently handy.

You get to show women that:

1.) You’re safe [social-proofed]

2.) You’re pre-selected

Ok, so let’s get to Will Beck from Canada, a pick-up associate of mines, who’s a big-name coach in the pick-up industry.

This brings me to another aspect apart from pre-selection and social proof: Eliminating Flakes and girls standing you up on the would-be first date.

Truth is: flaking is inevitable.

As long as women have emotions and a mind, flaking [indecision] is just something that every guy will have to face.

Women stand guys up on dates and flake primarily because of indecision pertaining to the guy and the date itself.

In conjunction with indecisiveness and indecision are nerves and anxiety.

You know that terrifying feeling in the pit of your stomach guys, when it comes to making that 1st phone call after getting a girl’s number?

Well that’s the exact anxiety-filled feeling a woman gets upon meeting up with a guy for the 1st time [D2 for instance].

She’s nervous, anxious, scared, jittery and unsure about herself…which all manifest in the form of flaking and the girl standing you up.

She doesn’t logically intend to do it [stand you up]. Just that these jittery feelings and emotions are talking her out of it- no different than when you’re contemplating making that phone call, and nervousness talks you out of it.

In essence; you flaked on the girl by delaying that call and electing to not call her at all when you knew it was the right moment!

Therefore, now you understand why women stand guys up and why they act flaky towards meeting up and so forth.

Now, what does this all have to do with taking photos with girls whom you’d picked up as what Will Beck advises here?

The girl having taken photos with you, gives her the impression [psychologically] that:

1.) She already knows you

2.) You’re safe

When the girl whom you’d picked up can go through her smartphone and see herself with you [via photo], it not only gives her the impression that she knows you already, but it helps to kill the nervousness factor which is bound to pop up in any future date proposal.

You won’t seem as much of a stranger to her.

Humans only get that weird and jittery feelings when around someone whom we don’t know.

This is akin to what we feel when going to a job interview to meet with people whom we don’t know.

Had the interviewers been someone we were familiar with, then the nervousness factor would not be as great if at all.

Hence, you want to give the girl the impression that she already knows you, thus there’s no reason that she should become panicky at the thought of meeting up, coming to your place or going for a drink/date.

One such way to achieve this is by always seizing the opportunity to take photos with the women whom you’d picked up.

This’ largely why I almost always take pics with the girls I pull.

It isn’t for show!

Surely I enjoy having pics of women in my media archives in order to reflect on the quality of chicks I pull. But that is just the psychologically gratifying part for me and not the greatest reason.

As for making this happen; it is very simple guys.

Upon picking up the girl (getting her #), you simply say to her: Let’s take 1 of those lame selfies for memory!

Whichever way you put it, there isn’t much to object to.

Most girls will nonchalantly oblige to taking some pics with you as long as you own it and not come off as if you’re nervous while pitching the proposal.

At the end of the day, when it comes to seeing the girl again, she won’t be saying to herself, “Who is this random-stranger guy that I never actually been around”?

Share post with friends!!

Like this:

Today, I did a little body-language exercise while sitting at the pier.

There was a girl whom I met seated about 25 yards away with her back facing me.

Here’s the actual photo of the seated girl.

All the while, she wasn’t aware of my presence since I sat at an angle which was outside of her view range. She would’ve had to look back in order to see me there.

While sitting there, I took mental note of her entire body language and posture:

“Back somewhat hunched over and down (while peering into her smartphone)”,

“Hair a bit disheveled at the sides as the wind blew her hair out of perfect formation”,

“Her shoulders slightly dipped downwards following the posturing of her arched back”,

“Her feet and legs somewhat stiffened”,

“The small of her back just where the buttocks meets the lower back was well covered but a slight gap as her panty was revealed a bit because she was hunched over somewhat”.

I took mental observation of these factors while scanning her body and posture unbeknownst to her.

Now, the trick is, was to see if her current-lax posturing will remain the same if she notices a guy [me] checking her out from the rare periphery.

This is absolutely the first time I would’ve done this random body-language exercise.

One dilemma faced me though: I had to get her to look back in order to know/see that I was there since I was seated about 25 yards in back of her as depicted in the actual poor-quality photo below [she’s in the orange top].

I tried everything from sneezing, coughing loudly, tapping on the table/bench that I was sitting on, talking loudly as I pretended to be on a phone call. :twisted:

Nothing gave!

She kept her face forward peering into her device.

Alas!

As if by devine intervention: an 8-wheel oil truck passed and blew its loud horn which got the attention of the girl…so she instinctively look towards the sound coming from the truck which happened to be in the direction I was sitting.

“Bam”!

Our eyes met for a nanosecond as she looked away once our eyes met!

I also waved hi to her.

That is all I wanted; for her to know that there was a guy [me] seated somewhere who happened to lock eyes with her.

This’ an actual photo I took at that exact moment.

Ok, so now that she was aware of my Alpha presence, would her body language be altered in any way significantly or ever so slightly?

I asked myself.

Instantly, she propped herself up!

Straightened her back!

Lifted her shoulders!

Accentuated her overall upper body!

Her lower back was revealed more!

Her body language became fixed and sexier. “Fixed” in the sense that she’d straightened out her posture. “Sexier” in that she accentuated her flanks, preened her hair back into position and assumed a position which gave me a better view to her boobs from the poor vantage point at which I was seated.

In other words: she then knew I was checking her out, thus she wanted to present herself in the most attractive way given the circumstance.

On a deeper level, this is akin to a mating ritual in the animal kingdom.

The female accentuates her physical attributes in order to attract possible mates.

This is why whenever a girl notices an attractive guy around who’s likely to check her out, she preens herself, her clothing, straighten her tight dress in order to present a more attractive view, she props up her breasts to appear more full and buoyant and so forth.

These are classic body-language cues and giveaways you will have noticed once you begin to take note of them by actually checking women out.

If she finds you attractive [energy or looks] and sex-worthy; she will put herself on display for you!

Contrarily, if she doesn’t particularly like your energy thus isn’t attracted to you; she won’t give much of a fuck and she’ll actually do the opposite and try her best to repel your stares in hopes to turn you off [this part is done consciously].

As a caveat here, if you want to know whether a girl has the hots or not for you, check out her body language.

They will always give her away!

Note: this is done on a subconscious level by the girl.

In other words; she isn’t even aware of her own body language giving her away.

Moreover, she isn’t consciously aware of the cues and signs that her body gives off towards the men whom she likes.

With this chick from today’s experimentation, her body language [positioning] indicated interest and attraction.

Not surprising, she got so into it that about 5-10 minutes later once she realized that I was checking her out, she laid herself down on the bench, knees cocked in the air and boobs facing upwards where I can now get a full view of them as if she were lying on the beach!

Was she suddenly doing all of this because of me?

Yes!

In order to get my attention even more.

These ‘subtle’ signaling often go unnoticed by guys whenever they are in the presence of women.

From now on, I want you to be aware of these things.

Make it your business to go sit at the park, beach, restaurant, on the bus, etc. and just observe the women around you.

Observe their movements, body language, arm position, legs positioning, their shoulders, what they do with their hands, do they straighten their hair, slick down their dresses and adjust their fitted wear?

Observe these things one day!

Eye contact isn’t necessary and it is the least.

You don’t need to gain EC from a girl in order to tell if she’s aware of your presence.

Focus on the body language!

Now, I need to make this crystal clear: I am NOT suggesting that you do this every single time you’re out and about.

You should take a day or an hour or so out of a day to run this observational experimentation.

You don’t want to be the creepy guy sitting around checking out women without actually approaching them.

During the exercise, try to exhibit normal as possible body language on your part.

Over time you’ll become more aware of the subtle signs women give off with their body posturing.

Oh- on a final note, don’t particularly focus on the quality of the girls in whom you’re observing.

If you’re riding a bus with all elderly women on it; still run your observations!

With the girl pictured in this post, since I didn’t quite see her face, she was probably unattractive for all I know…and is on the bigger side.

Doesn’t matter!

This is all experimentation to get you accustomed to reading body language.

Like this:

A day ago while attempting to pick up a girl over Facebook [as I usually succeed in doing], the following interaction ensued:

Arguable the best and most creative rejection attempt ever!

Sure I knew she wasn’t a tranny after I’d checked out her profile and pics prior to contacting her. But boy oh boy; this has to be the most ingenious rejection attempt I ever came across in my entire life of game: :lol:

I’ve had girls tell me that they are gay or bi-sexual, but never transsexual…as in they were born a man. :shock:

At the end of the day, this is no different than a girl telling you she has a boyfriend just to see if you’d buy it and self-reject.

Obviously, the girl did admit that she was screwing around and it was done because guys were annoying her…likely needy pests sending her novels worth of messages and flooding her inbox.

Girls will often seek clever ways to try to reject you, whether they’re interested or not.

1.) Women are just too docile and are afraid to offend and hurt others [very contradictive…I know]. This is why girls are notorious for giving guys fake phone numbers. Rather than say “No” to the guy and hurt his feeling, they will elect often times to give him a fake number just to cushion the pain somewhat.

2.) On the semi-positive end, women need to go around the bush in order to avoid looking slutty and easy. So social pressure often times force women to have to cloak their true intentions within coded language.

Check out this screenshot of a convo between a married chick and me whom I’d picked up about 2 months ago [my text in blue. Hers in gray].

My text in blue. Hers in gray

Now, quite naturally, you may say to yourself, “And…so…I didn’t see anything there”!

“I’m not really a texting persons”

That is a hint there…very significant though you might have missed the importance of such an innocuous comment.

That comment of hers within her broader text, depended on context and existential factors, can either be a positive or negative [for me].

If a girl tells you that she isn’t a texting person, she’s either trying to communicate to you that she doesn’t want to talk to you, i.e. she isn’t interested.

On the other hand, it may also indicate the opposite: that she is in fact interested but really isn’t a texting person.

Moreover, if she sends you such a message as this girl did in my case, you will have to exercise social intelligence to discern whether it in the negative or positive: she likes you or not.

A way in which to discern this [likes me- likes me not] is to simply take an overall glance of the vibe.

If the girl is acting a bit standoffish or cold, then it may be wise to assume that she isn’t quite into you at the moment.

If for whatever reason you surmise that she’s into you, then a comment like, “I’m not the texting type”, should be interpreted in the positive.

Now, the positive hint in such a comment can be interpreted as:

A.) The girl saying that she would rather hear you voice and chat over the phone opposed to texting [as in my case]

B.) The girl saying that she would rather meet up face to face and talk

Most guys unfortunately never get the hint since we men are oblivious to the fact that women operate in cryptic ways, and their words are somewhat like double entendre [open to 2 different interpretations].

With that being the case, from henceforth, if a girl says to you [for example: through text] that she doesn’t do the phone thing, i.e. she doesn’t text or talk on the phone much, always assume in the positive that she’s dropping a hint to mean that she’s hoping to meet up and chat instead.

Always assume the hint in the positive opposed to the negative.

Girl over the phone or text says that she’s hungry: assume that she’s dropping a hint for you to pick her up a snack and go hang out with her.

Surely I don’t advocate spending on women because it’s lame and puts you in the provider frame. But if it means getting a step closer to her bedroom or doorstep; by all means, you should grab her a snack and go see her.

She’s not going to directly expose herself unless she’s someone whom you’d known for a while.

If she does want you to “come over”, she’ll be more stealthy than that.

She has to be cryptic about it!

Her reputation leans on it!

If she does want you to come over, she will hint at it and hope that you’ll catch it.

If you don’t catch it, you subsequently lose value in her eyes and she will lose interest in you as someone who’s lacking in the social-intelligence department.

Note: most guys get rejected along the way due to this.

Even if they manage to pick up the girl and get her number, they soon after blow themselves out and tank their chances by not being able to see hints and to seize their opportunities.

Chicks will reward you for executing and demonstrating social awareness and being able to read subtle cues.

They will punish you and reject you for failing to do so. So, when the house wife said to me that she isn’t the texting type and she prefers to talk, I seized the opportunity to later on suggest we meet up and talk.

My text in blue. Hers in gray

As expected: she was up for it!

I passed the test by being able to read between the lines, hence my attraction in her eyes soared through the roof because of this 1 play in the game.

Remember the girl whom I’d hooked up with 3 days ago…when I was unable to maintain an erection? :(

Same can be said of that situation as it pertains to hints and subliminal messages.

First off: look at the time stamp of these texts…remind you that she had texted me first out of the blue.

If a girl texts you after 10 PM- out of the blue- chances are- she’s bored and open to the suggestion of meeting up/hooking up.

However, if you don’t firstly initiate the “I want to come over” text: she won’t!

With this chick, the simple fact that she had texted me at that hour, was a clear enough indication for my Jedi-mind that she wanted to hook up. So I took that as a hint and a subliminal message and seized the opportunity to initiate some sex talk which led her to say “Come over”.

That [hooking up] would not have materialized if I didn’t read between the lines [girl texted me out of the blue…after 10 pm].

How many instances like these have you encountered and failed to read the hidden message behind the message?

This is a very common occurrence. And I’m going to go out on a limb to say that this is the biggest reason [failure to read signs and seize opportunities] why guys get friendzoned in the 1st place [inability to read signs], and also the biggest reason why guys fail to sleep with girls who initially liked them whom they’d managed to pick up.

Everything boils down to one’s ability or inability to read hidden messages women put out there, and also one’s ability or inability to survey the dynamics in order to discern the bigger picture from an innocent and innocuous occurrence.

At the end of the day, I want to implore you to take nothing lightly!

Girl initiates the texting?

Assume that she wants to hook up!

Make her prove to you that this isn’t the case [obviously without asking her directly]!

Whenever you’re engaged in texting with a girl, always be aware of hidden agendas and hidden messages to the negative or positive.

Share post with friends!!

Like this:

Why do I now censor names and faces in screenshots…particularly of Facebook chat conversations which I take screenshots of in order to illustrate real-world points for you guys?

To be honest, I don’t see why guys make a fuss about censorship material [namely names].

To play devil’s advocate, I do understand why guys are skeptical about material that are completely censored.

It adds an element of “he has something to hide”.

In my case however, I had no qualms with posting screenshot conversations while leaving the girl’s names and faces un-blurred.

I really hated having to waste time uploading screenshot photos to a censoring app in order to mask the girl’s name and face, so I rarely ever did it.

Why have I started to blur shit nowadays?

Three reasons:

1.) To protect the girl’s identity as much as possible (which is a given)

2.) To cover my ass in case the girl happens to stumble upon my blog and see herself in a compromising position and then sees me as a grand asshole…which I have no problem with since I embrace the villainous persona

3.) Trolls & Haters

Of the 3 reasons that I censor names and faces in my text-logs, the third is the most substantial.

A while back, I picked up, seduced and banged an East-Indian chick [living here in the islands] in stunning fashion. So much so that I felt that the pick-up itself was worthy of a lengthy article and breakdown for advisory purposes for my ardent followers. So I took some screenshots of the pickup [through Facebook] and included them in the article.

East-Indian HB

Nothing new there.

Since the screenshots were originally taken from Facebook messenger, it hinted to the fact that the girl and I were likely friends on Facebook…and we were…and still are.

About a day later, some hater of mines and quasi-troll, actually contacted the girl through Facebook and tried to sabotage things between the girl and me. :mad::(:mad: Since I wasn’t censoring anything at that time, the girl’s full name and profile pic were visibly displayed in the screenshots, giving some weirdo easy access to stalk the hottie and to attempt to fuck me over in the process by blowing cover.

Little did he know, I had already been given the nod of okay from the Indian HB, and she was cool with me posting our text chats to my blog if it meant teaching guys how to connect with women over text [I love when a woman can see the greater cause].

Therefore, the girl was already aware of my post.

However, the troll being oblivious to this and on a mission to wreck my future chances of having sexual relations with this girl, went the extra mile to contact the Indian girl on Facebook to tell her that some guy [Kenny] had written an article about her in a not-so-flattering light.

Now, the girl having already known the deal, shrugged it off.

Upon the realization that the girl wasn’t budging and wasn’t throwing a fit, the troll then decided to net-stalk the girl, sending her crazy messages to her inbox, creeping her the fuck out, posting to her wall [remind you she has a husband], making the girl very uneasy as would’ve been expected. :shock:

In the end, the girl remained a good sport in spite of the risks that faced her: the husband discovering that she’s had an affair with some random guy she met through Facebook.

Anyway, so the net-stalking troll had threatened to message her husband and blow the cover on the affair…fortunately for her- he never did succeed.

From that incident, I realized how practical it was to cover my ass, though there’s no risk involved for me…besides an enraged husband trying to kill me for screwing his wife. :(:(

All in all, I learned a valuable lesson from that 1 situation. So that is why I take precautionary measures to censor faces and names as much as possible.

Like this:

I am often asked by curious folks, primarily viewers of my Youtube uploads, “Why do you exclusively pick up black girls”?

Fair enough question when it’s not coming from trolls but people who are genuinely curious.

I pick up girls of all races and nationalities.

My preference however, are black girls and East-Indian women.

Being a black guy, raised among black girls, quite naturally [and by osmosis], my attraction and preference would’ve likely been for black girls. So I do prefer black girls, just as any Caucasian male would likely prefer white chicks, Arab men would prefer Arab women, etc.

If you’ve been following my stuff for any time now, you would know that I currently reside in the Eastern Caribbean…where I was born actually [Antigua].

Just by sheer numbers and demographics alone [blacks being the vast majority in the Caribbean islands], there is bound to be a drastic edge towards black girls.

I mean- it is a sheer fucking numbers game.

It’s like being a black guy living in Russia and not expect that his options in women would heavily favor white women since they are the overwhelming majority…by a landslide.

In the Caribbean islands: same dynamics as any predominantly white region [but favoring blacks].

Hence, even if I had a preference for white or Asian women, they are limited in the Caribbean.

Sure the numbers of Chinese immigrants [from nearly a century ago] is vast. But still not big enough for consistent pickup if one were to only sarge Asian women in the Caribbean [and by the pick-up term “Sarge”, I mean to pursue women].

All in all, I am basically working with what I have at my disposal and what is available to me.

If I were in Latvia, I would hunt white tail…though I prefer black tail.

If I were living in Saudi Arabia; Arab ass would be the likely meal on my pickup menu…by sheer demographics and numbers.

It makes no sense to be living in Tokyo, Japan while hunting for white or black chicks.

The numbers just aren’t there to put up a significant enough lay count to even write about.

Therefore, you work with whatever the environment gives you as far as girls go.

My current region gives me sexy-ass black girls; so I wisely take them, opposed to sitting around waiting for my “ideal type”…just to use a reference here!

In closing: 70% of my street pick-ups and lays are centered around black girls, 25% around Latinas, and the remaining 5% consisted of whites and Asians.

The white girls whom I do pick up, almost always happen to be tourists, vacationers, off-shore campus students, drifters and transient types. But I would have to go to touristy spots on island in order to pull white girls…and I find that to be a huge waste of time.

Online however, I pick up a fair amount of white girls as designated bangs for whenever I travel.

When I’m back home in New York City [my 2nd home], I hardly ever game there since I’m only there for a day or 2 then back out the country.

On a final note, some guys seem to believe that I am incapable of gaming white chicks, so that is why I stick to gaming and bedding black girls to whom I’m accustomed.

Well- my many photos and videos slap that argument dead in the face!

Girls are girls.

There is no such thing as white girls are harder, Asian girls are easier, black girls are bitchier, women of this or that region is harder, bla, bla, bla!

Doesn’t exist!

Such fallacious drivel was created and propagated by mental-masturbating losers who haven’t gotten a clue as to what it is to consistently date or to interracial-date.

Guys on the ground like myself who have actual experience in picking up thousands of women, can tell you that there’s no such thing as difficult women by either race, ethnicity, nationality or religion.

On a fundamental level, all women are the same!

Sure there are cultural differences and variants, but those are just the superficial matters and not the core of a woman’s being.