Donald Trump’s Tomahawk Attack on Syria Is An Absurdity

No Evidence that Assad Was Behind Gas Attack in Syrian Village

Launching 60 cruise missiles against the Syrian government before an independent investigation can prove who exactly was behind the gas attack in Syria was foolish and played into the hands of the global warmongers.

By Matthew Raphael Johnson

President Donald Trump threw away a great deal of support by ordering a cruise missile attack on Syria April 7. Obviously, Assad would have had no interest in using internationally banned chemical weapons in a war that he has already won, well aware of the inevitable American response.

The attack on Sharat air base in Homs province was launched from U.S. ships in the Mediterranean. Three Syrian soldiers were killed, and the base was destroyed.

Worst of all, ISIS and other radical groups now have a new lease on life thanks to Trump buying into the international warmongers’ desire to topple the stable government in Syria.

One need not be a military strategist to realize that either the Syrian government is unhinged or the original chemical attack story was a lie.

The U.S. government warned the Russian military personnel at the air base prior to launching cruise missiles, in order to avoid a more serious incident, but Russia has still taken this as an act of war. Russian leader Vladimir Putin made the obvious statement that the attack was a form of unwarranted aggression.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that no evidence was ever offered that the Syrians would have made such an impulsive move in a war they had already won. The Foreign Ministry in Moscow stated:

The very presence of U.S. troops and other countries in Syria without the consent of the government or the UN Security Council is a blatant, explicit, and unwarranted violation of international law. If before it was due to the task of combating terrorism, now it is an attack on Syria proper. U.S. actions taken today will further destroy the Russian-American relationship.

In 2013, both Russia and the U.S. came to the conclusion, after substantial inspections were conducted, that Syria did not possess chemical weapons. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, attached to the UN, was in charge of the inspections.

The pro-U.S. Iraqi puppet government has confirmed that the terrorists alone possessed these weapons.

To the extent any gas was released, it was because the Syrian Air Force bombed a weapons depot that contained chemical weapons. The Russian Foreign Ministry stated:

In recent years, the organization [for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons] has inspected almost all the objects that were or could be related to the military-chemical program in Syria. As for Idlib, terrorists were engaged in the production of toxic substances that they stuffed into roadside bombs for use in Syria and Iraq. . . They turned a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons by terrorists in Iraq, as officially reported by [the pro-American government in] Baghdad. They dismiss the application documents of logged chemical weapons by terrorists in Aleppo. . . . There is no doubt that the U.S. military action is an attempt to divert attention from the situation in Mosul, where as a result of actions, including the U.S.-led coalition, killing hundreds of civilians and the growing humanitarian catastrophe (April 7, translation mine).

Questions about the alleged attacks abound. Feras Karam, an anti-Assad journalist, wrote on April 3 of his upcoming campaign to cover Syrian airstrikes on rebel-held villages and the use of chemical weapons, and said chlorine gas would be used. Further, Dr. Shajul Islam, a physician working in Khan Sheikhoun where the alleged gas attacks occurred, reportedly received shipments of gas masks several days earlier. Pictures have emerged showing volunteer rescue workers, the Syrian “White Helmets,” handling corpses allegedly from the attack without the protective gear required by normal protocol, because sarin easily penetrates the skin. It kills by breaking the contact between the brain and the lungs, rendering the victim unable to breathe.

This author claims no expertise in military aviation, but the consensus seems to be that Russian SU-22 jets’ custom bombs cannot be filled with any chemical weapons, as they are fully stuffed with their own explosives. The mechanism required to make the dormant gas functional is large and can only fit into a few types of warheads. However, the jets that allegedly gassed this area were SU-22s, flown by Syrian pilots.

ISIS is known to have used gas in the past, though far from the only ones to do so. The Daily Mail has obtained video showing experiments with gas being conducted on rebel bases throughout Syria. Even worse for the Americans, the CIA-controlled “Voice of America” has admitted that Jaysh al-Islam, the coalition of Islamist and Salafist units involved in the Syrian civil war, previously used chemical agents against Kurds in Aleppo. Therefore, as the Syrians handed over any old stores of chemical weapons to the UN in 2013, the rebels increased their stockpiles.

The most damning piece of evidence against the System’s view is that, just a week ago, the American government officially stated that “regime change” was no longer an option. Then, the gas attack occurs on a town that could have been cleared out easily by ground forces.

Assad has won this war, and is now focused on rebuilding internally and externally. To use gas at this juncture goes against all logic.

15 Comments on Donald Trump’s Tomahawk Attack on Syria Is An Absurdity

Donald Pinocchio Trump, the puppy dog of the Zionist fake Jewish Banking Oligarchs had no qualms in licking the feet of Chinese President Xi Jinping, since the Oligarchs are afraid of China, they love to attack little countries like Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Laos, Cambodia, Beirut, Grenada, Panama, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria.
However, the Oligarchs are scare sh-tless of China, which has a population of 1.386 billion souls, a highly trained Fighting Force of 1.6 million, and a huge Nuclear Arsenal.
Russia, China’s number one ally is not far behind with its nuclear arsenal.
So, Oligarchs beware, you will not escape.
Think, which is greater the eagle or the dragon?

Do we at LEAST sue the Manufacturing companies to get a refund for the 39% FAILURE rate? How about an investigation? Sure, it’s OK cause they were just “conventional” deadly weapons, but what happens if the’re ‘safe’ little nukes?

We don’t need their oil, and we don’t want their drugs. We don’t have any money to fight Unconstitutional wars or wars in general. The effect of these wars will be the economic destruction of our own country.

It cannot be undone. I’m getting too old for this crap.
“Worst of all, ISIS and other radical groups now have a new lease on life thanks to Trump buying into the international warmongers’ desire to topple the stable government in Syria.” AFP
Well now, all you conservative, water-cooler, Monday morning quarterback cowboys out there, it looks like you’ve got a new shoot-from-the-hip leader in town who is rapidly becoming unre-electable.
Too bad. He showed such great promise for rescuing America from the Globalists and has probably blown it by trying to MAGA in the wrong way by doing what he criticized Obama for doing in Libya and Bush in Iraq — regime change without purpose that destabilized a prosperous country that posed no danger to the U.S. He’s doing it all over again in Syria.
This isn’t minor stuff. He broke a major campaign promise. What happened to his non-intervention promise?
Why did he do this after all of the good he has already done just with his executive orders? Who was he listening too?
When I heard about the strikes I was shocked, appalled and VERY, VERY DISAPPOINTED.
Is he just another damned neo-con?
The first clue was the cutbacks to other countries in foreign aid while still sending the annual $3,000,000,000.00 welfare checks to Israel.
Is he going to look like a warmongering buffoon later on after the UN investigation is complete, or is he already a war mongering Globalist puppet?

There was a plan to overthrow all these countries before 911. 911 was to motivate the U.S. into fighting another countries wars. Syria and next Iran. See General Wesley Clark : Wars were planned-seven wars in five years!

As soon as I heard the network news about this, I figured it had to be yet another false-flag attack designed to put the blame on yet another legitimate leader that the NWO wants to topple. This was so obvious I don’t know how Trump could have fallen for the classic trick. I can no longer support him until he gets rid of the warmongering neocon influences that apparently surround him.

Sad to see Trump following the CIA agenda after vowing to work with the
Russians. The two greatest tragedies to befall the USA were the FED and the
CIA, both passed by well intentioned Democratic presidents who both realized
their grave error after the fact (Wilson and Truman)

The President that was supposed to make a change in how our government operates is following in the footsteps of those that have gone on before him, attacking a foreign country without any provocation or proof they did what it claims it die!
When the Trump began changing his mind and his stance on various issues I said to my son, and others, President Trump is following in the footsteps of all politicians, telling you one thing when running for office and doing something different, sometimes the exact opposite of what he said. He is unstable and cannot be trusted to keep his word “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” (James 1:8).