[2009 oct] MRI
Studies: The Brain Permanently Altered From Infant Circumcision by Dr. Paul D. Tinari Ph.D.A
neurologist who saw the results to postulated that the data indicated that
circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the victim's brain
associated with reasoning, perception and emotions. Follow up tests on the
infant one day, one week and one month after the surgery indicated that the
child's brain never returned to its baseline configuration. In other words, the
evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised
infant was permanently changed by the surgery........Not only could we not
publish the results of our research, but we also had to destroy all of our
results. If we refused to comply, we were all threatened with immediate
dismissal and legal action.

CENSORSHIP. 1947 - EPILEPSY
STUDY. HARRY ANSLINGER’S CONCERN
Today [for all practical purposes] it is against the law to do any
medical research on Medical Cannabis in this country. And has been so probably
since the days of Harry Anslinger. HOW? --- To quote another section of this
book (on why Medical Cannabis will never be legalized) :
. . . The narc's have a very long history of repressing / ignoring the truth. .
. . There are numerous other ways the narc's have of assuring that Cannabis NEVER
gets FDA approval. HOW?
You want to do medical research [6] on Cannabis, you FIRST
have to get a permit from the Drug Police. Of which, they simply don't give out.
In fact, since the passage of the control substances act (1970), all the way
up until California passed Prop-215 legalizing Medical Cannabis under their
state laws, NONE were issued. According to Chemical Heritage Magazine:
"Today, American researchers who wish to obtain legal
cannabis for scientific study must apply to the National Institute on Drug Abuse
(NIDA), which maintains a government-funded, 1.5-acre marijuana farm in Oxford,
Mississippi. Compared with street marijuana, however, the government's plants
are low in cannabinoid content, and some researchers have also complained of the
institute's slow and seemingly arbitrary decisions. In 1994 Donald Abrams, a
professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, proposed
to study the effects of smoking cannabis on HIV-related weight loss, but his
application was rejected by NIDA, even though it had been approved by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration. When he then resubmitted his proposal, this time
emphasizing the drug's potential negative effects, NIDA not only approved the
study but also provided him with nearly a million dollars in funding. Another
researcher, Lyle Craker of the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, applied to
the Drug Enforcement Administration in 2001 for the right to grow cannabis for
research purposes as a way of sidestepping these potency and access issues.
For three years he heard nothing, until a federal court ordered the Drug
Enforcement Administration to respond. They said no, so he sued them. That
case is still under way. "
. . . . . The chill affected researchers as well as
clinicians. Medical journals published dozens of studies before the tax act but
few after its enactment. As researcher Lester Grinspoon noted, " virtually
no medical investigation of cannabis was conducted for many years " as a
string of additional laws, including the 1951 Boggs Act and the 1970 Controlled
Substances Act, further deterred research." --- T. Geller - Chemical Heritage
Magazine.
Which is a nice way of [saying] -- NO WAY IS IT EVER GOING TO BE RE-LEGALIZED.

Quotes"To protect herbalists from persecution by the Company of
Physicians and Surgeons. Company of Surgeons in London, minding their own
gain, and doing nothing for the profit or ease of the diseased, have sued,
troubled and vexed honest persons (herbalist) ... Said persons have not taken
anything for their pains and skill...Surgeons have small cunning, yet take great
sums of money and do little for it." - Act of Parliament, 1512 AD. Appendix 2,
chapter 2. p.2.

"Samuel Thomson (1769-1843, herbalist) so upset New Hampshire
doctors that they persuaded the state legislature to pass a law specifically
naming him, not for practicing medicine 'illegally' ('the usual charge with
which to charge non-allopathic practitioners') but to prevent him (from) healing
people without charging them." - Donald Law, A Guide to Alternative Medicine.

As you know, even though we have the First Amendment in the
Constitution, the FDA has negatedthe First Amendment
when it comes to free speech in health care ever since about the ‘40s and ‘50s.That’s why if you pick up your bottle of vitamins in your local natural
food store, let’s say you pick upa bottle of Vitamin
E or something, all it says is “supports cardiovascular health.” Because if they
wereto put on there that Vitamin E has been found in
this scientific study over here to cut the rate of heartattacks by this percent, even though the research is true, they could be
hauled up by the FDA on thegrounds of making an
unapproved claim. The FDA doesn’t care whether it’s true or not, they just carewhether they’ve approved it.
And so, fish oil, for example. Everybody knows, and all the major medical
journals have published itin the last two years, that
taking enough fish oil every day cuts your risk of sudden cardiac death by 50percent or more, and yet if anybody put that on a label of a fish oil
bottle, they would be out of businesstomorrow, I
guarantee it...........here’s another little inside truth, not
secret, but truth. It gets printedevery once in a
while and I’ve seen it online. In the mid 1990s, at someone’s cardiology
convention,the Annual Convention of the American
College of Cardiologists or something, one of the speakersasked that particular audience, “How many of you recommend Vitamin E to
your patients?” Andapproximately 25 to 30 percent of
the doctors there raised their hands—remember this is conventional,that’s pretty good. And, “How many of you take Vitamin E yourself?”
Better than half of the roomraised their hands!
............Here’s a research article from Finland, or from Scandinavia
anyway, it mighthave been Finland. A whole bunch of
kids, starting at age one, were started on 2000 units (andwe’re told by the FDA that’s going to kill them if they’re one year old)
of Vitamin D, and thatwas maintained for a few years,
and there’s a control group that didn’t get any Vitamin D. Andwhen they finally looked at all the statistics, the number of new cases
of type-1 diabetes—juvenilediabetes—had been reduced
by 80 percent!An exclusive
interview with pioneering physician Dr. Jonathan Wright http://downloads.truthpublishing.com/DrWright.pdf

"We
can solve well over 90% of the all chronic diseases with simple,
inexpensive natural therapies."---Dr. Mercola

"The FDA 'protects' the big drug companies
and are subsequently rewarded, and using the government's police powers
they attack those whothreaten the big drug
companies. People think that the FDA is protecting them. It isn't. What
the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it is doing are as different
as night and day." -Dr. Herbert Ley - Former U.S. FDA Commissioner

You can see the allopaths suppress vaccine criticism right
before your eyes on Wikipedia.
Eg: one deleted the Assemblage Point
page

[Media March 2006] MHRA
forbids Sweden to reveal Strattera suicide dataThe British Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
has forbidden Swedish authorities to reveal Strattera suicide data. A release in
Sweden of data about suicides and suicide attempts from Eli Lilly's Strattera is
said to hurt the relations between the two countries.

"The use of drugs is world wide and sanctioned by
powerful drug
interests, the professional associations and governments. It seems not to matter
that huge numbers of patients are being denied their chance for full recovery......
niacin has not been fenced in and the treatment has indeed been trampled on for
the past 40 years by the galloping hordes of professional establishments, the
American Psychiatric Association, governments, the FDA , the National Institutes
of Mental Health, and by nearly every health-professional organization. It is a
wonder that there are any orthomolecular doctors at all." ---Abram
Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D.

"The surgeons. They controlled medicine, and they
regarded the X-ray as a threat to surgery. At the time surgery was the only
approved method of treating cancer. They meant to keep it the only
approved method by ignoring or rejecting any new methods or ideas. This is why
I was called a 'quack' and nearly ejected from hospitals where I had practiced
for years." - Dr. Emil Grubbé. Dr. Emil Grubbé, ...discovered...X-ray
therapy (for cancer) in 1896...X-ray was not recognized as an agent for treating
cancer by the American College of Surgeons until 1937...Dr. Grubbé...still was
not recognized as late as 1951." - Herbert Bailey, Vitamin E, Your Key
to a Healthy Heart.

During the course of Dr.
Ivy’s trial, a letter was read into the court record written by a doctor
from Indianapolis. The doctor stated in his letter that he was treating a
patient who had multiple tumors, and that a biopsy of the tissue had shown
these tumors to be cancerous. The doctor said that he had obtained
Krebiozen from Dr.Ivy’s laboratories and had administered it, but that it
had done absolutely no good. When called to the witness stand, however, the
doctor’s answers were vague and evasive. Under the pressure of
cross-examination, he finally broke down and admitted that he never had
treated such a patient, never had ordered the biopsy in question, and never
had used Krebiozen even once. The whole story had been a lie. Why did he
give false testimony? His reply was that one of the FDA agents had written
the letter and asked him to sign it. He did so because he wanted to help
the agency put an end to quackery.In September of 1963, the
FDA released a report to the effect that Krebiozen was, for all practical
purposes, the same as creatine, a common substance that was found in every
hamburger. To prove this point, they produced a photographic overlay
supposedly showing the spectograms of Krebiozen and creatine superimposed
over each other. These were published in Life magazine and other segments
of the mass communications media as “unimpeachable proof” that Krebiozen was
useless.When Senator Paul Douglas
saw the spectrograms, he was suspicious. So he asked Dr. Scott Anderson,
one of the nation’s foremost authorities on spectograms, to make his own
study. Using standard techniques of analysis, Dr. Anderson identified
twenty-nine differences between the two substances. There were sixteen
chemical and color differences. The version released to the press by the
FDA had been carefully moved off center until there was a maximum
appearance of similarity, but when restored to the true axis, the two
were as different as night and day.[Chapter 1] THE WATERGATE SYNDROME

Between 1992 and 1996, FDA
prohibited companies that sell folic acid from telling women of childbearing age
that .4 mg of folic acid daily before pregnancy could reduce the incidence of
neural tube defects (including spina bifida and encephaly) by 40%. FDA’s
censorship contributed to a preventable 10,000 neural tube defect births.Between 1994 to 2000, FDA
prohibited companies that sell omega-3 fatty acids from telling Americans that
those fatty acids found in fish oil could reduce the risk of coronary heart
disease by as much as 50%. FDA’s censorship contributed to a preventable 1.8
million sudden death heart attacks. Between 2000 and the present, FDA prohibits companies
that sell saw palmetto extract (the fruit of the dwarf American palm tree) from
telling Americans that saw palmetto reduces enlarged prostates and relieves
related symptoms. Approximately 50% of all men age 50 and older suffer from
enlarged prostates and are denied access to this information. Between 2000 and the present, FDA prohibits companies
that sell glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate from telling Americans that those
dietary ingredients treat osteoarthritis and relieve osteoarthritic pain and
stiffness. Approximately 20 million Americans suffer needlessly from
osteoarthritis.StopFDACensorship.org - FDA
and Health Freedom Protection Act

The myth/lie: "If
it works (and can be proven to work) orthodox physicianswill use it and call it conventional medicine."
The reality: Orthodox physicians are allopaths and they don't use
non-allopathic/Cartel medicine.

The truth about cures without drugs is suppressed, unless it suits the
purpose of the censor to garble it. Whether these cures are effected by
Chiropractors, Naturopaths, Naprapaths, Osteopaths, Faith Healers,
Spiritualists, Herbalists, Christian Scientists, or MDs who use the brains they
have, you never read about it in the big newspapers.---Hans Ruesch

The Illuminati are sitting on technology and knowledge that could bring about
almost a virtual paradise, but they are hoarding this
technology and knowledge, and suppressing it....After
you read this chapter and are aware that the secrets of cranial manipulation
could rescue children with cerebral palsy, and some of the children with Down
syndrome, you too will cry with this author at the needless suffering that the
Illuminati have perpetrated upon mankind in their quest for total domination of
this globe.8: THE SCIENCE OF BODY
MANIPULATION & PROGRAMMINGDeeper Insights into the
Illuminati Formula

"While writing the story of Gerson, I couldn’t help feeling it
was too shocking to believe. The friends with whom I discussed it became almost
angry in their denial that anything of the sort could happen in this day and
age. It developed that we were all naïve…there had been dozens of lone
scientists…who had been stamped out of existence and driven to spending their
last days in solitude and bitterness."—S.J. Haught (Dr. Max Gerson, Censured for
Curing Cancer).

" It became obvious to me that their effort and thrust was not towards
making people better. It was an effort to hook those people, to make 'em dependent upon
that psychiatric business. Repeat business ... repeat ... repeat ... repeat. I decided
that I wasn't "into" that kind of situation."----Lt. Col Chris Christensen
(Ret.) http://www.tir.org/metapsy/wildcat.htm

While thousands of dollars per patient are spent on HIV/AIDS research,
only a few dollars are spent on heart disease, cancer, mental illness,
suicide prevention or road trauma.The funding paradox reaches epidemic, almost farcical proportions in
developing countries where Western AIDS workers spend their days dispensing
advice and condoms to a population dying for want of potable water, adequate
sanitation and nutrition, and antibacterial, antitubercular and antimalarial
medicines - in a word, dying of poverty.The Yin & Yang of HIV by Valendar F.
Turner

"Remaining silent about the destruction of nature is an
endorsement of that destruction."--Redwood Mary (a.k.a. Mary Rose)

"The
pharmaceutical "business with disease" is the largest deceptionand fraud business in human history. The product "health" promised bydrug companies is not delivered to millions of patients. Instead, the"products" most often delivered are the opposite: new diseases andfrequently, death.While the promotion
and expansion of diseases increase the market ofthe
pharmaceutical investment industry - prevention and root causetreatment of diseases decrease long-term profitability; therefore,they are avoided or even obstructed by this industry.The survival of the pharmaceutical industry is dependent on theelimination by any means of effective natural health therapies. Thesenatural and non-patentable therapies have become the treatment ofchoice for millions of people despite the combined economic, politicaland media opposition of the world's largest investment industry."
--Dr Rath MD

"Perhaps the greatest evil of immunization lies in its diversion of public
attention from true methods of disease prevention. It encourages public authorities to
permit all kinds of sanitary defects and social problems to remain undressed, particularly
in schools. It ignores the part played by food and sunlight and many other factors in the
maintenance of health. It exaggerates the risk of diphtheria and works upon the fear of
parents. The more it is supported by public authorities, the more will its dangers and
disadvantages be concealed or denied." M. Meadow Bayly, M.R.C.S., 1944

The great myth/lie: Robert S. Holzman MD
wrote: "If it works (and can be proven to work)
orthodox physicians will use it and call it conventional medicine."
(Alternative medicine is non-allopathic medicine)

"Physicians, who were anxious to get rid of the most damaging indictment
yet preferred against vaccination. This they, sought to accomplish, as far as possible, by
ignoring it altogether."--William Tebb (ch 9, Leprosy
& Vaccination)

"1935 The Pellagra Incident. After
millions of individuals die from Pellagra over a span of two decades, the U.S.
Public Health Service finally acts to stem the disease. The director of the
agency admits it had known for at least 20 years that Pellagra is caused by a
niacin deficiency but failed to act since most of the deaths occured within
poverty-striken black populations."---A
History Of US Secret Human Experimentation