i yet tried omni now but using waves wallet and it is growing its portfolio and adding more and more coins to its portfolio and you can also sell your hold coins in wallet as they have trading platform in their wallet.

How about automated distribution? ETH may have smart contract with automated distribution. Omni and Waves seems to require a cabinet with manual distribution and accounting of incoming payments? However, in terms of hacks, cabinet seems a safer solution for collection in diversified coins.

I would vote for waves. It is so simple and simple people are majority. I did not try OMNI but Ethereium is of course a very professional platform. Now it comes the question if ICO creating should be something simple for most users of cyptocurrency or it should be complicated so only programmers know what to do?

ETH will always be supported by all the ICO based on its platform and all the ICO that are yet to come. It has its issues, mainly from network congestion and possible difficulties switching to PoS but overall it is supporting by a huge portion of the alt community which won't let it die.

Survivability is one of the most important factors for an ICO as otherwise they would have to transition their tokens to another platform over the long run. Omni and Waves are good platforms but they aren't guaranteed to survive long term.

I have only tried once and that was waves tokens, i would say that it's good platform but I agree that eth can be better despite the fact that I have never tried (not omni also)Go to eth, it will be better.

I would like to open a discussion on pros and cons of the competitive platforms for token issuing: ETH, Omni and Waves. Any suggestions?

I see Omni advantage in dividends, however ETH has deeper market and more followers.

WAVES and ETH are good in issuing tokens but I like waves better. Even if ETH has more investor support, I just simply liked WAVES UI and it's built in exchange, wavesdex which is already in the wallet. That way users of a certain token can convert it into bitcoin and back easily without needing to send it to another exchange's wallet. Sometimes ETH tokens are more prone to hacks I think than waves issued tokens.

i yet tried omni now but using waves wallet and it is growing its portfolio and adding more and more coins to its portfolio and you can also sell your hold coins in wallet as they have trading platform in their wallet.

I do the same, I never try omni and never heard before. What is omni? What 's the feature of the coin, where is listed in exchanger, is the platform like etherium and waves. I have used and stored my token and coins in eth and waves but Omni " Never". I want to know.

both waves and eth never heard of omni but waves have DEX which ethereum do not have but ethereum have a large base which waves doesnt have in my opinion both are good platform and most people would probably prefer ethereum than waves

I would like to open a discussion on pros and cons of the competitive platforms for token issuing: ETH, Omni and Waves. Any suggestions?

I see Omni advantage in dividends, however ETH has deeper market and more followers.

dividend will never be implemented until the platform will have the main source to encourage the profit and distributing it to the investor. I think the ethereum is comparable with the waves platform but not sure for the omni. Iconomi can be a good example for you about the implementation of the dividend.

Forward thinkers should look at Xtrabytes. The platform will run any programming language but more importantly has none of the scaling and security problems of ETH. The last thing a big company needs is ETH screwing up in the future. XTRABYTES is bullet proof. Its due to become open source soon.