I am unaware of a single honourable action for his electorate of Gerard Batten in persuit of his own direct ambitions!

This is the odious fellow who seemingly supported Tom Wise’s criminality and sought to prevent Peter Baker a defence when he was dishonestly persecuted by Derek Clark MEP aided by the corrupt fantasist Douglas Denny!.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.Hi,

you will be pleased to note that I have4 now developed the page of links, as shown at the head of this blog.

You will note that I have also included the links of ‘JUNIUS’ as I have found them to be accurate and bearing well informed comment over a prolonged period.

As ever I stand by the many and varied comments and facts I have provided over the years and to date not a single posting I have made has EVER been shown to be consequentially inaccurate on any material way – should ANYONE find I have made an inadvertant error they are requested to contact me as soon as possible so that I can make any minor correction which is felt is needed.

You will note my entry of

Tuesday, 6 July 2010

#0048* – UKIP‘s Gerard BATTEN IN A CAT FIGHT – No Surprise There Then! Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable! The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque in POWER& the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Hi,I may well think that Gerard Batten UKIP MEP is little better than an excrecence with no manners, no charisma, little personality, no understanding of Justice and far better suited to running a telephone shop for BT than acting to represent ANYONE.Gerard Batten is unreliable, untrustworthy and clearly dishonest.Gerard Batten is a self serving creep without loyalty, integrity or morality – a Racist, anti Jewish, anti Muslim, anti Homosexual, pro EU membership supporter of UKIP’s membership of the Pan EU Political Party EFD group.Gerard Batten is a contemptible little man who has done next best to nothing to move Britain one iota closer to leaving the EU.You will note Gerard Batten openly colluded in the utterly corrupt selection process of UKIP leadership, of which he is a part, relative to the dishonest and corrupt selection of UKIP potential MEP candidates – he even employed the liar Michael McGough to promote the corruption.Batten’s only independent claim is that he had a member of his staff do a re-write of the Government Pink Book on expenditure ie the cost to Britain of EU membership – The fiirst one he had produced was in 2006 and he has publish an update annually – here is the latest one as advertised on his web site CLICK HERE So I guess his staff have managed to produce two! That slime like Batten disgust me and represent nothing that I value about these United Kingdoms may possibly have dawned on you, but he does deserve the right to defend himself against a very personalised attack by a fellow MEP.Nothing like a good cat fight and who better to be involved than Gerard Batten and Mary Honeyball of Labour they are a fairly well matched pair with so much in common!SECONDS OUT SECOND ROUND:

Mary Honeyball Labour MEP

– Tells lies about Gerard Batten MEP

Mary Honeyball Labour MEP for London for reason known only to her has chosen to tell lies about me on her website the misnamed, ‘The Honeyball Buzz’ (who exactly is she trying to kid?). I am flattered that she sees UKIP as such a threat (as she should) and that she needs to attack me, but telling lies about me personally is not the way to do it. I have asked her nicely to take down the lies and write a retraction. She has ignored my request.

I am advised that what she says is libelous and actionable but that the only people who make money out of libel actions are libel lawyers. Therefore I will counter to her lies with the truth, and respond by telling some truths about her.

I won’t waste any time responding to her political criticisms since they are the product of her politically correct, one dimensional and simplistic perspective and not worth the trouble. But I will deal with some of the specific lies she tells about me.The lies.She says about me, ‘he… does not pay his taxes’. This is a lie. I have been paying taxes on PAYE since 1972 solely in the UK. I have always paid every penny in tax that that I was ever liable for.

She says about me that she exposed that ‘I was covering up my financial records’. This is a lie. I have carefully complied with all the rules, regulations and requirements of the European Parliament in full and on time.

If Mary is referring to my signed and blank Financial Declaration published on the European Parliament website, it is blank because I don’t have any financial interests to declare. Unlike her I don’t have to declare the use of a free tram pass in Strasbourg, free rail travel in Belgium, and free parking in City Airport – because I don’t use them. However as she is obviously taking advantage of whatever is going free I expect she assumes everyone else is doing the same.

She says that I am ‘not keen on people of different races mixing’. This is a lie. It is based on her deliberate misrepresentation of serious articles I have written on the doctrine of political multiculturalism (which I don’t believe in). I have many constituents, acquaintances, friends and family of different races who can demonstrate her lie is just a pathetic attempt to smear me.

She says it is a ‘UKIP proposal to cut back public spending by killing prisoners’. Another lie. Again based on a deliberate misrepresentation of a speech I made on the death penalty in South Korea. I do believe in the return of the death penalty in the UK for some crimes, but it is personal view not UKIP policy. I can make a serious case explaining why I am in favour of it – could Mary make a serious case to the parents of the victims of paedophile murderers why she is not? I doubt it.

Mary is “absolutely useless” says colleague.Mary Honeyball holds her seat only because of positive discrimination. In 2008 the Labour Party’s selection rules said that if the first candidate on the list was a man the number two had to be a woman. That is why a hard working and conscientious sitting Labour MEP (Robert Evans) was passed over so that Mary Honeyball was elevated to number two. She doesn’t hold her seat because she was the best candidate but because she is a woman. She gives positive discrimination a bad name and that is an insult to all men and women who expect to succeed on merit.

No wonder that one of her Labour MEP colleagues confided to me in desperation over a coffee that she is “absolutely useless”, and that she only achieved her position second place on Labour’s London list “because she is a woman”.

Mary Honeyball’s record compared to Gerard Batten’s and her own Labour colleagues.In her first five year term (1999-2004) Mary only managed to speak in the Parliament a total of 12 times.

In my first term (2004-2209) I managed to speak a total of 184 times. During that period Mary managed only to speak only 17 times. What exactly was she doing during the monthly Strasbourg sessions for five years? Going on tram rides using her free pass perhaps? Composing lies for her website? Who knows?

Since we were both re-elected in June 2009 I have spoken 30 times but Mary has only managed to speak once, and on a subjected related to Italy. She is the worse performing Labour MEP in the Parliament. At the time of writing (1st April 2010) her Labour colleagues have spoken an average of 12 times each to her once. And I have spoken more times than any one of them.

Prior to the European elections in June 2009 the Open Europe think-tank rated all sitting UK MEPs on their record for openness and transparency. Gerard Batten was rated 9th out of 78, Mary Honeyball only managed 35th place.

Labour has the nerve to criticise UKIP?There is a lot more I could say but just to finish off, it is a bit rich for a representative of the rotten to the core Labour Party to criticise me and UKIP.

The criminal incompetence of Gordon Brown has brought Britain to the edge of bankruptcy after thirteen years of criminal mismanagement of the economy.

Labour took us in a war in Iraq on the basis of lies. Meanwhile Tony Blair, the man who told those lies is now lining his pockets with millions of dollars made as a result of the connections he made while in Downing St; all this while some of our bravest young service men and women are returning home dead and maimed. But if you speak out be careful, under Labour’s terrorist legislation they have criminalised a young woman just for reading out the names of the war dead at the Cenotaph.

Labour has deliberately given us unlimited and uncontrolled immigration in order to create a problem that is not meant to have a solution in the name of ‘diversity and multiculturalism’. They have damaged the education system to such an extent that hundreds of thousands of children now leave school unable to read, write or count properly. Crime is now out of control in many parts of Britain.

Soon to be out of work ex-Labour MPs and cabinet ministers ply their dubious services like “cabs for hire” prepared to sell whatever knowledge or influence they think they have to the highest bidder.

Worse than that many prominent Labour MPs including some Cabinet Ministers and Gordon Brown were first installed in safe seats in the 1970s and 1980s by Labour Party organisers now known to have been working for the KGB. This is a matter of historical record and a book on the subject by Russian political historian Pavel Stroilov will be published shortly. Some of Mr Stroilov’s work in this vein has already published in the Spectator magazine and he recently revealed the communist agenda of the Unite Trade Union in its bankrolling of the Labour Party (Daily Mail 24th March 2010).

It should not therefore be surprising that the Labour Party and Government no longer able to serve the Soviet Union are now dedicated to betraying Britain to the European Union. In the most cynical political move ever they reneged on their 2005 election manifesto pledge to hold a referendum on the European Constitution/Lisbon Treaty.

So while I try to remain on polite and friendly terms with my political opponents in the European Parliament my readers might understand why I don’t take kindly to being personally attacked with lies by a lazy, nonentity of a political place-woman representing an incompetent, corrupt and traitorous political party.

Tuesday, 3 November 2009

UKIP leadership election: Gerard Batten

So why has Gerard Batten decided to run for the leadership?

In the past he has described the position as “a poisoned chalice” and has repeatedly resisted calls for him to stand.

He is clearly not that interested in the job as his website makes absolutely no mention of his leadership bid. Indeed, the latest news entry refers to the Irish getting ready to vote on Lisbon! See:LINK

He is also yet to publish his election statement and where is his presence on the UKIP members forum?

The only site we can find devoted to his campaign is a blog entitled ‘Vote Gerard Batten’. The sub-heading reads ‘Leading the campaign to make Gerard our leader. Forget the rest and vote for the best’.

The site has to be seen to be believed. One entry invites you to make a Gerard Batten badge while another complains that the other candidates will steal Batten’s ideas if he publishes them! Yeah, right!

But perhaps we are being rather harsh. Clearly ‘Tim’ is doing his best to salvage a lost cause.

So what is Batten really up to?

Gerard has been critical of Farage for a long time. He rightly regards Farage as a liability and has often said that UKIP would be better off without him. There is certainly no love lost between the two with Farage usually describing Batten as “that f***ing BT salesman”. Indeed, he hates Gerard almost as much as he hates Nikki Sinclaire!

Farage wants Lord Pearson to succeed him as leader. He wanted a coronation. The last thing he wanted was an election!

It has to be said that Alan Wood, Gerard Batten, Mike Nattrass and Nikki Sinclaire are currently not names to mention in front of our beloved Nigel!

I am sorry to let the cat out of the bag but Gerard is not really serious about leading UKIP.

His decision to stand was largely motivated by a desire to p*ss off Farage and his favoured successor.

1 comments:

Hi, Do not forget Gerard Batten colluded in the orchestrated cover-up of Tom Wise’s criminality. Do not forget that Gerard Batten never missed an opportunity to lie about me due to his embarrassment in being shown to be without morality with regard to Tom Wise. Do not forget that Gerard Batten colluded with Derek Clark MEP & the corrupt Douglas Denny to pillory and orchestrate a Kangarroo Court ensuring Peter Baker was denied a fair hearing by blocking the ONLY valid witness. Do remember that Gerard Batten is associated with Mike McGough who is a proven liar and cheat. Do remember Gerard Batten permitted the publication of a private letter from John Wise permitting the bullying and lies of the vile Mike McGough on the internet. Do remember that Gerard Batten failed to do ANYTHING to address the corruption of the MEP selection process and the returning officer’s report. Do remember Gerard Batten did absolutely nothing publicly to support his staff member Lynda Robson in her Official Complaint as per Returning Officer’s exposure of corruption and dishonesty. Gerard Batten has not so much as murmered to block association with racists, xenophobes, anti Jewish, pro violence, sexually intolerant colleagues in the Farage Pan EU Political Party/group. This man is indisputably unfit for leadership or as an MEP. Regards, Greg L-W.

Tuesday, 3 November 2009

UKIP leadership election: Gerard Batten

So why has Gerard Batten decided to run for the leadership?

In the past he has described the position as “a poisoned chalice” and has repeatedly resisted calls for him to stand.

He is clearly not that interested in the job as his website makes absolutely no mention of his leadership bid. Indeed, the latest news entry refers to the Irish getting ready to vote on Lisbon! See:LINK

He is also yet to publish his election statement and where is his presence on the UKIP members forum?

The only site we can find devoted to his campaign is a blog entitled ‘Vote Gerard Batten’. The sub-heading reads ‘Leading the campaign to make Gerard our leader. Forget the rest and vote for the best’.

The site has to be seen to be believed. One entry invites you to make a Gerard Batten badge while another complains that the other candidates will steal Batten’s ideas if he publishes them! Yeah, right!

But perhaps we are being rather harsh. Clearly ‘Tim’ is doing his best to salvage a lost cause.

So what is Batten really up to?

Gerard has been critical of Farage for a long time. He rightly regards Farage as a liability and has often said that UKIP would be better off without him. There is certainly no love lost between the two with Farage usually describing Batten as “that f***ing BT salesman”. Indeed, he hates Gerard almost as much as he hates Nikki Sinclaire!

Farage wants Lord Pearson to succeed him as leader. He wanted a coronation. The last thing he wanted was an election!

It has to be said that Alan Wood, Gerard Batten, Mike Nattrass and Nikki Sinclaire are currently not names to mention in front of our beloved Nigel!

I am sorry to let the cat out of the bag but Gerard is not really serious about leading UKIP.

His decision to stand was largely motivated by a desire to p*ss off Farage and his favoured successor.

1 comments:

Hi, Do not forget Gerard Batten colluded in the orchestrated cover-up of Tom Wise’s criminality. Do not forget that Gerard Batten never missed an opportunity to lie about me due to his embarrassment in being shown to be without morality with regard to Tom Wise. Do not forget that Gerard Batten colluded with Derek Clark MEP & the corrupt Douglas Denny to pillory and orchestrate a Kangarroo Court ensuring Peter Baker was denied a fair hearing by blocking the ONLY valid witness. Do remember that Gerard Batten is associated with Mike McGough who is a proven liar and cheat. Do remember Gerard Batten permitted the publication of a private letter from John Wise permitting the bullying and lies of the vile Mike McGough on the internet. Do remember that Gerard Batten failed to do ANYTHING to address the corruption of the MEP selection process and the returning officer’s report. Do remember Gerard Batten did absolutely nothing publicly to support his staff member Lynda Robson in her Official Complaint as per Returning Officer’s exposure of corruption and dishonesty. Gerard Batten has not so much as murmered to block association with racists, xenophobes, anti Jewish, pro violence, sexually intolerant colleagues in the Farage Pan EU Political Party/group. This man is indisputably unfit for leadership or as an MEP. Regards, Greg L-W.

Let us hope this makes my consistent contempt for the odious little self serving fellow over many years abundantly clear and it would seem to be mirrored by many others – one need only note how few votes this vile little man received when he put himself forward as a candidate for Mayor of London or even more embarrassing was his achievement in the UKIP leadership election when he put himself forward.

It seems he is now finding himself in competition from his own UKIP Party political Organiser for London who I gather is funded by The EU as Batten’s staff member yet he manoveurs to oust Batten, it seems, in his own quest to ride high on the hog on the EU Gravy Train with snout in trough – a cause Batten has dedicated his actions to for many years, would that he had made some consequential efforts for the electorate towards the Leave-the-EU cause without his own self interest seeming all pervading.. .

UKIP TRIES to deny Racism for years!Racism & bullying is at the core of UKIP!Not so much the BNP in Blazers but more a choice of The BNP on Zimmer frames or in Nappies!

Again & again they fall foul of employment laws, abuse laws and blatant racism or anti homosexual stances!

Whether they like it or not they are judged by their associates and behaviour!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
Hi,

probably one of the greatest acts of folly on the part of UKIP so called leadership has been to link UKIP with racists, xenophobes, anti Jewish and violent anti homosexuals in Continental politics forming the damaging and repugnant Pan EU Political Party EFD Group

Be minded of UKIP’s track record of racism and that includes the obscene extremism of Christian evangelism and some of the Baptist cults and sects from House to the Satanic Mormon cults.

Some may remember the clear and undeniable activities of Tony Bennett with his vile and intolerant campaigning against Muslims – to be fair he was eventually removed from UKIP

Then there was Jeffrey Titford and his connection with extremists with Mike Nattrass prior to their days with UKIP.

Bloom’s praise of the killing of Green peace activists in New Zealand were ill considered & the Court decision against him and Farage were further damaging to UKIP’s credibility!

Next we saw UKIP’s puppet leader the idiotic Malcolm Lord Pearson and his anti Islamic extremism and dishonesty as featured and exposed by The News of The World!

Association with The Swinton Circle by Farage, Tom Wiseand others has done little to enhance UKIP credibility! Nor Farage’s efforts to negotiate with The BNP:

Now we have the dedicated fundamental extremism of Gerard Batten!

One has to wonder who on UKIP NECthought it was a good idea to have Batten colluding with Sam Solomon and not just consorting with but he has written the foreward to the odious and extreme:

A Proposed Charter of Muslim UnderstandingBy Sam SolomonForeword by Gerard BattenUK Independence PartyMember of the European Parliament for London1st Edition – December 2006Revised Edition – April 2007

Seemingly distributed via Gerard Batten’s UKIP office and no doubt at the expense of UKIP Funds, which he is entitled to. Funds that were allocated for the use of UKIP and to further the Leave-The-EU aims of UKIP!

One is forced to speculate as to whether Harold Batten was the printer and what that was billed out as

Whatever your superstitions or beliefs I can not believe that even UKIP is stupid enough to have endorsed Gerard Batten’s evil and divisive racism be that on colour, creed or views!

A Proposed Charter of Muslim UnderstandingAffirmation

I, the undersigned, as an individual, or as an official representative
of an organisation, accept in principle the need to re-examine and
address the meaning and application of certain Islamic texts and
doctrines; and that the issues identified in the Proposed Charter of
Muslim Understanding represent the basis for further discussion of
these issues.
I affirm my belief in:
1. The equality of all human beings, before God and the law
2. Equal rights for women, in principle and practice
3. The rejection of coercion, intimidation and violence in the
name of religion
4. Religious freedom and rejection of the persecution of those
who convert from one faith to another
5. Tolerance of other religions, and their believers, and the
rejection of religious teachings that discriminate against
others on the basis of their religious beliefs.

One has to wonder who and what degree of malevolence was required for someone to believe this garbage has any place in British politics – You will note the fanciful assumption that religion is a plausible concept on which any sane individual could legislate!!

Can one rationally believe that ANY of this childish drivel has any part in a campaign to Leave-The-EU – Here is more nauseating clandestine material being published under cover by Gerard Batten it would seem – One must wonder who exactly he sees to be his master and surely even UKIP would not subscribe to this racist prejudice:

Gerard Batten MEP

CONFIDENTIAL

DRAFT

Dismantling Multiculturalism

Policy Discussion Document

10th February 2011

Multiculturalism has failed

Multiculturalism depends on the proposition that all cultures, cultural beliefs, customs and practices are equally valid. Mass immigration into many western countries for the last forty years or more has brought with it some cultures and cultural practices that are alien to western cultures and liberal, democratic political systems. Instead of taking a robust attitude against these alien practices western countries have mostly adopted an attitude of appeasement and cultural relativism. Western Governments have been terrified of criticising or standing up against these practices for fear of being branded ‘racist’ or ‘Islamaphobic’.

Most European and Western countries are multi-ethnic societies and is no reason why people of difference racial and ethnic origins cannot live together peacefully; but to do so requires emphasising those things we have in common rather than those things that separate us. It requires that all citizens living in a given state have broadly the same allegiance, loyalty and belief in a common set of public and political institutions and the acceptance of one legal system. Multiculturalism does precisely the opposite: it creates different and competing groups within one public and political space and is a recipe for division and conflict.

Many European and Western countries have adopted a policy of state-sponsored multiculturalism, designed to preserve and enshrine the beliefs and cultural practices of migrants and to protect and advance them by law and public subsidy. The objective was that the policy of multiculturalism would help absorb and integrate vast waves of migrants from foreign lands. In that it has conspicuously failed – as now has been publicly attested by figures such as Trevor Philips Head of the Race Relations Commission, President Angela Merkel of Germany, President Sarkosy of France, and latterly Prime Minister David Cameron of the UK, to name just four.

However from the point of view of those groups that use multiculturalism to promote their own separate interests it has and is succeeding and they have a vested interest in seeing it continue.

Private Multiculturalism Good: Public Multiculturalism Bad.

A clear distinction must be drawn between private and public multiculturalism. The private practice of religious and cultural beliefs, customs and traditions should be precisely that – private. We can all enjoy the private practice of different cultures and beliefs and share them with our friends and neighbours. That is a good and positive thing that can help bring people together.

The public policy of state-sponsored multiculturalism is quite another thing and it has created an increasingly more fractured, divided, contentious and uneasy societies. It cannot go unsaid that the biggest beneficiaries of this public policy of multiculturalism are Islamic fundamentalist and extremists who use it to extend their own power and influence in order to bring about their long term goal of an Islamic or Islamic dominated state in each one of those countries where they settle. Multiculturalism also undermines those moderate Muslims who wish to embrace Western values but see power and influence being extended to their extremist co-religionists.

Islamic fundamentalism is the cuckoo in the Western multicultural nest. We can either address it now or be destroyed by it in the course of time.

Dismantling Multiculturalism

This short paper is not a detailed history, analysis and critique of multiculturalism and its failure. It is taken as a given that it has failed and has to be dismantled. The points below are suggested policies that could be adopted by political parties and governments of any political colour and in any country in the world that wishes to preserve and promote common western liberal democratic values. The points below are specifically aimed at Britain but can adapted as required.

Policy Suggestions

Recognise that Christianity is the cultural heritage of Britain and affirm the secular nature of government and public institutions. This should be recognised by an exception for the Church of England as the historically established church but bishops should be removed from their positions in the House of Lords and the Monarch should lose the power (exercised through the Prime Minister) to appoint the Archbishop of Canterbury.

A commitment to end the policy of state-sponsored and funded multiculturalism by local and national government.

A commitment to promote a common public culture, expressed in a common language (excluding existing historic regional differences), one legal system and one set of political institutions – none other should be formally recognised by the state.

There must be equal application of the law. There can be no separation of people based on religious practices in public places, e.g. in swimming pools and hospital chapels.

There must be one language used in national and political institutions and publicly funded places (excluding historical differences such a Welsh in Wales or Gaelic in Scotland). In England only English must be displayed in public buildings such as local and national government offices, universities, colleges, schools, hospitals, clinics etc.

Repeal the Act of Parliament that recognises Sharia law in some tribunals, (e.g. for family law, child custody, inheritance etc). Sharia law must be given no official recognition or legal status whatsoever.

Repeal the Act (???) that gives official recognition to Islamic Banking. There must be no financial or banking regulations based on religious law.

Repeal those Acts (???) which give recognition to polygamous marriage for tax or social security and benefits purposes. There must be no official or legal recognition of polygamous marriages.

Stop all government funding to organisations that promote religious fundamentalist or extremist views, e.g. the Muslim Council of Britain, the Quilliam Foundation, the Union of Imams & Mosques in the UK and Ireland etc. Any organisation that requests public funding must be required to sign and actively abide by a Code of Conduct (see Appendix I).

Social Security and benefits payments can only be claimed in English where the recipient has been living in the UK for 12 months or more. For those who have entered the UK and do not speak English subsidised English classes must be made available.

No granting of planning permission to religious organisations that: do not abide by and actively practice a Code of Conduct (see Appendix I); are funded from outside the UK unless they have a special dispensation from the Home Secretary, such dispensations should discretionary and will only granted where it can clearly be shown where the money originates from, and where it can be demonstrated that it is not from extremist sources, or is intended to promote religious fundamentalist or extremist views.

Repeal the Religious Hatred Act (???). The promotion of hatred or violence against individuals or groups is catered for under the normal criminal law. No religious belief system or ideology may be protected from criticism by law.

Ensure that the law on forced marriages and female genital mutilation is rigorously enforced.

Religious schools should only be allowed where they can sign and show actively to abide by a Code of Conduct (see Appendix I).

Repeal the Act of Parliament that gives exception for ritual slaughter for religious reasons. These are outmoded and barbaric practices that have no place in the 21st century or n the light of humane animal welfare policies.

Something on the funding of universities???

Enact a law of face coverings in public places. (see Appendix II)

END

Appendix I

Code of Conduct

To be added as per existing ‘Affirmation’

Appendix II

Face Coverings Policy

To be added later a per existing ‘burka and face coverings policy’.

One must wonder what twisted mind outside of Nazi Germany would believe this acceptable or even moral – Herman Goerring would be proud of Gerard Batten’s efforts and many will remember Nigel Farage & Mark Croucher‘s collusion to exploit their BNP friends like Buster Motram who was a family friend of Nigel farage’s whom he had personally sponsored within UKIP as with his own Election Agent from The National Front!

Nigel Farage was set to not just orchestrate his own Crystal Nacht to seek to rid himself of his enemies (those who believed in probity and that ALL were answerable to the members and the rule of law) – Their own Reichstag Fire was in place and when triggered by Farage at an NEC meeting the low grad clowns on the NEC like puppets jumped through every hoop placed before them.

The result of this ‘Night of The Long Knives’ was the removal of Dr. Eric Edmond & Dr. David Abbott from the NEC despite their undeniable elected status. The removal of honest men made way for more sycophantic and dishonest puppets – the likes of the fantasist Douglas Denny, the odious and idiotic Mick McGough and others – now UKIP has the misfortune of the Tory reject and the image of sleaze that the risible Niel Hamilton brings as his main contribution to his own very personal ambitions!

Little wonder that Gerard Batten is in trouble with The Courts and facing an Industrial Tribunal with the expectation of some staggeringly bad publicity for UKIP that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the aim to Leave-The-EU. It seems that Gerard Batten may well find himself facing some of the best legal brains in the field of Human Rights and Race Relations, for more details CLICK HERE.

I am seriously sick and tired of the toe rags and excrement that UKIP fields to lie and berate those who seek to expose the corruption and clean up UKIP.

Lets for a change look at the lies of Nigel Farage – as presented here in his embarrassing performance on BBC Hard Talk where he repeatedly lies on point after point, where he fails utterly to convince.

Very little of what Nigel Farage says in this video is true. As of course the informed will know whilst the gullible will be stupid enough to believe anything!

The selection process of Ashley Mote was without a doubt shoddy, and Farage merely put him in place removing David Lott as number two (a wise move when you consider the idiocy and dishonesty of David Lott, had UKIP checked on the facts regarding Ashley’s pending Court Case!) just as without democratic input Farage PLACED the dishonest and discreditted Marta Andreasen as his number two displacing Steve Harris when she was a proven liar and an inelligible candidate!

Similarly Farage colluded in the corrupt process that place the dishonourable and untrustworthy liar David Bannerman as lead candidate and thus MEP!

Farage goes on to claim that Tom Wise was sacked immediately his criminal behaviour was known and Farage claims the credit!

Farage NEVER sacked Tom Wise – Farage’s puppet Douglas Denny did everything in and beyond his power and authority to lie and defame others to protect Tom Wise. Tom Wise remained a UKIP MEP sitting with the UKIP group until he RESIGNED long after his criminality was exposed just as he continued to be a UKIP member until after his membership ran out in the last February of his tenure of office just before the elections – some 4 years after his criminality was exposed.

Further Farage’s staff solicited him to renew his membership and also asked him for donations – this is Farage’s staff, Farage NEVER having made a donation of substance in 18 years!

Tom Wise was aided and abetted in his criminality seemingly in exchange for a sum of several £1,000s which he GAVE to Farage from the money he stole to settle Nigel Farage’s debts with Lindsay Jenkins!!

Unlike Nigel Farage – Never once in my life has ANYONE established that I have EVER told a material lie or set out to deceive anyone, yet the scum gathered around this serial liar Farage constantly seek to defame and lie about me.

You will note also that in this video clip Nigel Farage lies about the £2 Million he boasted of receiving – he has NEVER to this day provided remotely transparent accounts and nor have UKIP.

Many will remember Farage’s idea of transparent accounts is to pay a chum £6,000 to write up a set of accounts for his OFFICE in a converted barn that is provided free of charge by a gullible patriot, with a staff of 3 working out of the office and their salaries paid by The EU nowadays previously there was a book entry of £211,000 expenses out of just over £400,000 that went through the account as declared!

£211,000 for sundry expenses!!!! For Steve Harris, David Samuel-Camps and the girl servicing in the kitchen that sure is a hell of a lot of paper towels

Then we see Farage desperately trying to lie his way out of the criticism of John West – do bear in mind it was that slut Annabelle Fuller who, as an employee of Farage posted John West’s video on You tube in flagrant disregard for data protection or common decency – as to non credible and litigious do remember UKIP aka Nigel Farage lost every single case John West brought.

Interestingly Leading Councel when asked for his opinion on this particular video and the dishonest and defamatory remarks made regarding John West advised against litigation as although he would almost certainly win it was very unlikely that damages would be adequate to cover costs as Farage would not be seen as consequential and thus to be defamed by him would be inconsequential in the eyes of the law. It was amusing to hear a leading QC or repute describing Farage as irrelevant and not considered credible – hardly surprising I guess in view of his irrelevance in politics.

Do not forget that Nigel Farage’s employee, for it is he who controls ALL of the mainline staff in UKIP Mark Croucher, aided and abetted by the then deputy leader of UKIP Paul Nuttall and the press officer Clive Page who set out with the dishonest aim of preventing me from publishing the truth and the facts about UKIP and its corruption by the likes of Tom Wise, John Moran, Derek Clark, Douglas Denny, David Bannerman, Mick McGough, Mark Croucher, David Lott, Stuart Agnew, Marta Andreasen and other sordid individuals and the like – UKIP lost that Court case too having used Mark Croucher as the ‘front man’.

In flagrant disregard for British justice to this day UKIP have not acquitted their debt honourably and have reneged on their debt to me of around £12,500 just as the low life and liar Mark Croucher has shown contempt for British Justice with the aid of UKIP and has failed to pay the Courts £8,500 as awarded.

That UKIP has now been in British politics for 18 years and that it has firstly never had a leader of any competence, leadership skills, professional ability or fundamental Officer Quality – merely a succession of jumped up Corporals of no gravitas and less competence is sad – that in 18 years it has not a single achievement of note based upon its own merit or ability merely success at getting elected in foreign elections considered correctly to be of absolutely no consequence – The ONLY achievement to date!

Britain is neither an inch nor a centimeter closer to leaving The EU as a direct result of UKIP and in 18 years it hasn’t even come up with a plan as it has no vision, hasn’t devised a strategy as it has no clear aim and has no tactics for lack of communication and training!

UKIP in 18 years has failed totally to devise even the simplest of workable exit and survival strategies and can arguably be shown to be further from influence at local or national government level due to the damage it has done itself with its lies, childish name calling, cheating and crass behaviour. Not to mention serial fraud and dishonest attempts to defame its legitimate critics.. .

Is UKIP TERMINALLY TAINTED by EFD Associates & PEPPs OR can it be Cleaned-Up?

Cleaned-Up sufficiently to be taken seriously as a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem by the Ethical Majority in Britain!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

To Check Details use Links in text & ALSO The >Right SidebarUKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS<

Hi,

in considering UKIP, The EFD and Pan EU Political Parties one would do well to consider the quote of a dedicated long term member of UKIP in discussion of UKIP’s partner on The EFD‘s comments Mario Borghezio‘s comments when he said of the violent Norwegian Christian nutter & spree killer Anders Breivik:

“One hundred per cent of Breivik’s ideas are good, in some cases extremely good. The positions of Breivik reflect the views of those movements across Europe which are winning elections.”

It is a disgrace that UKIP are associated with such people.

He is quite right and this highlights one of the potential catastrophic outcomes of UKIP, or any genuinely patriotic party, following the money and being lumped in with the comments of vile Nationalists be they British, as with The BNP, EDL, Zionism (under a guise of Friends of Israel) or the like.

Yet more astonishing is that a party can stand for votes and clamour and expound on being patriotic and not at all like these Parties mentioned, yet join with even more odious foreign partners for self enrichment!

Interestingly UKIP loudly (currently) bans ex members of The BNP & UKFirst Party, due to their racism, and in UKFP‘s 9about whom UKIP knew astonishiongly little as proven by their idiotic belief that I would have been a member or associated with Peter Cole or its other founders for whom I had utter contempt, particularly in the light of their association with Tom Wise – (an association which was clandestine and unknown by Robin Page, Petrina Holdsworth & John West I believe! Also probably others involved such as Trevor Coleman) – UKIP’s case seemingly being for daring to stand in British elections to oppose the racism and association of UKIP with such groups as The EFD to clean-up the party and make it electable yet are banned from joining UKIP!

It is notable UKIP leadership claque wave these rules arbitrarily when it suits them, as with John Petley of UKFP who was reintroduced as an employee of Prof. Tim Congdon and conveniently UKIP overlook the fact that an ex UKIP elected NEC member is the registered owner of The UKFirst Party (by the way he is African by ethnic origin!), having driven him out of UKIP – is this clandestine racism on UKIP’s part?

So it would seem UKIP is happy to support vile racist, anti Jewish, anti homosexual advocates of murder when it suits them, especially when it pays its own corrupted leadership and its parasites!

Is UKIP now a spent force that has betrayed its electorate, its Country, its values for a grubby claque of charlatans who are enriching themselves as they feed at the EU Troughs and would seem to be a part of the problem with no serious role in the solution?

This may not be a popular question for UKIP, but clearly it is they who have provided the need for it to be very clearly answered, and that they have so desperately undermined their own credibility, not just by association with the scum of EU Politics in The EFD Group but by whom they have employed and empowered – so many low lifes like Mark Croucher, Mick McGough, Hugh Williams, Annabelle Fuller, Marta Andreasen, Malcolm Pearson, Gawain Towler, Stuart Agnew, David Bannerman, Derek Clark and the like all proven liars and cheats they clearly command nor deserve respect in any field, least of all political.

And any doubters should simply read today’s email from the Chelmsford office:

To: ukipeastadmin@intamail.com Cc: dcbdcbuk@yahoo.co.uk ; stuart.agnew@btconnect.com Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Eastern Counties Newsletter In a message dated 14/03/2011 10:18:45 GMT Standard Time, ukipeastadmin@intamail.com writes: Dear All Due to European Parliamentary rules the Eastern Counties Newsletter will now have a new format. The colour newsletter will include articles about the work of the MEPs and about the EU itself. We can no longer include party material in the actual newsletter. However, a separate black and white risographed page will be included for branch events. If you would like any notices of meetings or branch events included in the next edition, can you please ensure that they are sent to my email address, lisabuckle@ukip.org, or by post to the Chelmsford office, by Friday 1st April 2011. Many thanks, Lisa BuckleUK Independence Party 145 New London Road Chelmsford Essex CM2 0QT

And this is what Martin Harvey – a leading UKIPPER in the East – had to say in his email response to Buckle:

I am amazed to find the East in such a state that it cannot fund a newsletter to its members who have put so much effort into campaigning to get two MEP’S elected, and also to have had such great success at last years General Election, and are already campaigning for local elections. If you go ahead and publish a newsletter confined ONLY to EU matters, all it will do would be to brainwash some members into thinking ‘Ever closer to the EU IDEAL’.please scrap the idea and come up with something that is to do with UKIP as a National UK Party, but even more important something to do with the forthcoming Local Elections,

regards Martin Harvey.

P.S. Since when did UKIP have a MANIFESTO that committed us to follow EU Parliamentary Rules ?

End of emails.

Now you know why Agnew has been placing EFD adverts in the East Anglian press. See: LINK

UKIP could have easily continued to publish an Eastern Counties newsletter. The funds are available. Agnew and Bannerman have more than enough money to finance one!

To blame EU rules is a pathetic excuse. Do they really expect UKIPPERS to fall for that? Mr Harvey has every right to be angry in his email. UKIP is slowly morphing into a new pan-European party as per Farage’s instructions.

So why bother with boring local branch matters?

And thanks to Ms Buckle for confirming that UKIP is committed to obeying EU rules!

We must have missed that bit in the UKIP manifesto!

Nevermind – we hear Nikki SINCLAIRE has a 16 page colour News Letter currently due!Paid from her salary we gather!No doubt her transparent accounting will show the costs!

When I received this message I believed it was worth publishing the same FACTS and spoke with Junius & Tim to ensure the maximum number of members and press were made aware of the betrayal of Britain by UKIP.

We checked The Manifesto and it is correct to say NO WHERE does it say anything about UKIP will obey EU rules to help it grow!

Even Tom Wise UKIP MEP produced coloured News Letters at his expense in UKIP’s name and mailed out to UKIP members until he went to prison for his theft of public money!

I’m sure Tory Central Office could provide another PR company to do something on a professional basis for Agnew & Bannerman and produce a Newsletter as well..

To QUOTE Ian Gilman re: Tom Wise UKIP MEP jailed for his criminality for 2 years – you may make what you will of Ian Gilman’s statement regarding Tom Wise and UKIP leadership corrupion amongst its leadership and their parasites in betrayal of the many decent members:

The case of the corrupt and jailed former police officer and UKIP M.E.P. Tom Wise Esq. again raises its head.

In October 2005; I was the only NEC member to attempt to do something about Mr. Wise following publicity and gossip about his activities. I was systematically blocked and prevented.

Minutes from that NEC should show my perhaps twenty minutes of effort on behalf of the members who we claimed to protect.

Abuse was heaped upon me together with shouted requests that I must be “shut up”.

Frauds were explained that would cause the Inland Revenue and Police to investigate and jail numerous UKIP members if revealed, and I being perhaps ‘jointly and severally liable’ for matters that I knew nothing about decided to step aside. Why after all; should I be responsible for others crimes as described ?

I was a volunteer for 15 years who asked for and took nothing from ukip, only satisfaction that I and others believed that we were doing our duty by our country and its history.

Please refer to the thread last August ‘ Bloom blast for shoplifters’ to understand much that I am writing about. It will prevent repitition. Mr . Denny provoked the defence of my position.

In attempting to actually discipline Mr. Wise who had for example destroyed the legitimate NEC approved ‘UKIP Wine World ‘ (conceived by me to assist paying our General Election debts of £ 93,000) from which no monies can be identified despite Mr Wise describing his importation and storage of 1,000 bottles of fine wines ( a commercial quantity ) perhaps from The Lebanon and his friends vineyard then sales via ukip meetings and membership lists; I was opposed with such venamence as to realise that I had no place any longer at that table.

Further; the dark threats emanating from that meeting indicated that eventually matters affecting the volunteer membership , many of whom were/are pensioners and our funds would legitimatly cause some to be jailed or fined.

With the close association that Mr. Wise had with Beds police as described by him; why did they not immediately hand over to another force the case which broke in 09/05 and concluded in 11/09 !

I will now quote directly from the file as originally constructed / evidence bagged and numbered and signitures upon a legal statement identifying its existance for identification. Later as far as I understood it should have all been contained within the file named Regina v Thomas Harold Wise. This will be held by Beds. police, C.P.S., Southwark Crown Court and I gather The Justice Dept. The Home Office and aparently Number 10 Downing Street.

“Wise explained to ***** all about his frauds /embezzlements of public money…..”

“Wise had not only explained his frauds, he then explained that he is safe from prosecution”

“Wise claimed to have lots of contacts within Bedfordshire Police, including “high up contacts “, whatever that means “

Wise, stated *****, claims to enjoy protection and will not be prosecuted.”

“Wise claimed to have met and talked with The Chief Constable of Beds. “

“Wise claims to have visited Beds Police H.Q. and spoken with those who would investigate him and to have been assurred that he will not be investigated “.

” ***** invoked the social life/circle of Wise who enjoys a drinking / eating circle of greedy sycophants who probably patronise The Ship public house in Linslade, Leighton Buzzard Beds ( Wing Road in fact maybe 200 yards around from his house ) . Excess of indulgance evidently being the motivating factor. “

“Wise likes to invoke the fact that he is a former police officer “

“Wise gave to former Detective Superintendent Trevor Colman of Devon and Cornwall Police a statement early in 2006 admitting everything yet is confident that he cannot be prosecuted”

Thus in fact Mr Wise evidently labourd in the belief that he was immune.

We are told that she is ‘partnered’ and that her ‘partner’ was found employment there too.

Her partner was a police officer in Beds.

Her partners father is explained as a previously a Beds police Superintendant.

He is married to the previous Chief Constables Secretary.

The Chief Constables secretary has hourly and daily access to The Chief Constable who the reader will see from the above direct quotes from the file as originally constructed is described as rather too close to the defendant.

Nothing is implied by the above, only reported facts are written. Without Prejudice.

Why, oh why did Beds Police not hand this case over to another force ?

Surveillance by me due to concerns about my own security and legal position in a corruption case that had odd aspects to it involved the Ship Road, Wing Road areas of Linslade and divers areas around Leighton Buzzard. Woburn Road , Kempston Beds. areas too and those working there too formed part of my investigative personal protection.

Threats to me and criminal damage and tracing of; with two nasty telephone calls to my then recently widowed mother ( different telephone area to me ) alarmed me too.

Given everything supplied to Beds. police ,

Where is the wine world monies generated by Mr Wise ?

Where were its first bankings ?

Were there any onward transfers / sharing of that money ?

Where has the treasurer accounted for that money ?

Was the auditor satisfied with the accounting, and Electoral Commissioners too ?

Why immediately upon being offered the Wise case did Beds police Chief Constable not declare not only the forces interests in matters but the Economic Investigation Unit’s association too ?

What was the role of Detective Inspector Shane Roberts ?

Please name all officers friendly with or within the circle of Mr Wise, to include the drinking/dining set as described and on file ?

Did any officer have to move departments/ accept transfers tempoary or permanent during this case ?

Was any police officer/retired officer or police authority employee in the habbit of buying wine from Mr Wise ?

What is the import licence number of Mr. Wise’s wine business ?

Which bonded warehouse, and owned by whom stored the wine imported as decsribed by him ?

Was customs VAT paid on the wine, and to which office ?

When a complaint was made to Beds police about the case (not me ) why again was an internal officer Det. Insp. Green given the job, an outside force surely should have looked at this ?

When a complaint was made to Beds police authority and Miss Stephany McMenamy (described as completly out of her depth) why did she not refer it to an outside force ?

Why then were (by now) three, yes 3 investigations concerning former police officer Mr. Wise retained within Beds and not referred out to completly neutral officers where Mr Wise could never ever make claims of friendship and perhaps forms of influence; or friendships made through an interest in wine. ?

I went to another police force who became so concerned about matters that they ” called for the papers” that is the Wise file in order to read and understand it.

At a later meeting a Detective Inspector changed his attitude to me , having read the file and brushed me off with ” not in the public interest ” to pursue this, despite the intimidation of my mother and myself,. Did he actually mean not in the interest of police officers careers ?

As I explained to him, that intimidation never prevented me doing my duty and presenting evidence to a court, and seeking to protect UKIP members and their funds. Why was he now so scarred ?

Why have requests under the Freedom of Information Act affecting this case from two police forces been blocked ?

Why do those forces appear to collude and use the same letters ?

Why were police officers identified by Mr Wise not interviewed/cautioned and statements taken?

Were witnesses warned by the police about the claims of closness made by Mr Wise placed upon file in evidence bags and the liklihood of trouble if they persisted with their evidence ?

Were all statements taken of a professional quality admissable in court, or was theredisquiet about the effot put in to produce evidence that witnesses could sign for and stand in court under oath ?

Why has it been reported and circulated ( I can only repeat that explained to me ) that as he entered court Mr Wise Mr Wise was heard to say to his fellow defendant ‘ dont worry your pretty little head about this case deary, I am a friend of The Chief Constable’

Why then, if the reports are anywhere near accurate was the case not stopped and immediately referred to the Police Complaints Commission and another police force ?

Why have all attempts to obtain documents about this case been blocked and thus civil actions prevented ?

During the 4 year 2 month enquiries were Mr Wise’s computer systems properly opened and contents thoroughly investigated ?

Lord Ted Willis liked to talk about ‘The Long Arm of the Law, but perhaps here Ancient Greece that gave to us the Demos that we fought and gave so much to preserve can play a part.

The Hydra is my metaphor, the ghastly many headed beast perhaps adequatly reflects the many aspects of corruption that pervades matters. How sad..

The original can be found amongst the very questionable and largely dishonest ramblings hosted by Anthony Butcher on his Forum in accord with the instructions of UKIP leadership.

I can confirm most of what Ian Gilman is claiming based upon my own involvement during the period in question and my direct involvement in seeking to bring Tom Wise to Justice and thus to jail.

ELABORATING WITH DETAIL ON A PRESS ARTICLE ABOUT UKIP!!SHOWING A FEW EXAMPLES of UKIP LEADERSHIP CORRUPTION!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

here is an article from the press covering UKIP, which is increasingly unusual as they slide from sight in complete irrelevance having done virtually nothing of note for Britain but a great deal to enrich a small claque of mostly low lifes:

LET’S face it: the record of the three main parties on expenses claims leaves a lot to be desired. Not like the smaller parties, for example, the UK Independence Party, of course. They have a spotless record on corruption don’t they? They don’t even have any MPs, after all. Surely their reputation must be spotless? Well, actually, no.

Take UKIP leader Nigel Farage. Just to reiterate what I said in my recent letter (UKIP’s credibility record is ridiculous, November 29), Farage claimed £2 million of taxpayers’ money in expenses and allowances on top of his £64,000 salary as an MEP. Is this illegal? No. Is it ethical?

Well, I’ll leave it to you readers to decide for yourself.

Two UKIP MEPs, meanwhile, Tom Wise and Ashley Mote, have actually broken the law and been jailed. Wise is, as I mentioned before, still in jail after being sentenced for false accounting and money laundering last year.

The official UKIP line is that the party distanced itself from Wise as soon as the matter arose, although according to some accounts the party initially fully supported Wise and he only ceased to be in UKIP when his party membership lapsed naturally. Mote, meanwhile, received a nine-month prison sentence after being found guilty of benefit fraud. Incredibly, even after this, he was allowed to remain as a UKIP MEP.

According to AT Dudgeon’s letter of November 25 (Knavery of ruling elite is exposed) UKIP are “committed to full disclosure and the rooting out of corruption”. In the light of the above facts, how on Earth can anyone believe this?

A brief correction or two for Chris Halam who quite reasonably seems a little out of touch with the detail.

Ashley Mote did NOT commit any crime whilst either a candidate for UKIP or an MEP – he was brought in as a candidate by Nigel Farage who believed his new found chum would boulster his own vote in the South East ensuring he was returned as the lead candidate.

Although David Lott, Farage’s long term friend and co worker was number two candidate he was unceremoniously dumped by Farage seemingly as he was convinced, as his intellectual superior and a far better speaker, Ashley Mote would get more votes to ensure Farage’s position.

Farage did the same in the last election dumping Steve Harris in order to elevate his own position by having the Spaniard Marta Andreasen tell a pack of lies about how she was sacked from her position as a departmental accountant and book keeper in Neil Kinnock’s employment – sacked when she proved unable or unwilling to do her job and when it was found she had misled her employers with her CV having failed to tell the truth as to how the OECD had suspended her without pay until she left!

Putting a Spaniard into a South East British seat when she lives in Barcelona and has never been a British resident and is a consumate liar and fraud is the sort of dishonest action UKIP is regularly involved in as far as Direct democracy is concerned UKIP’s policy is clearly ‘Sod Democracy I Direct’! as made abundantly clear if you CLICK HERE or go to other source data CLICK HERE you can also view the Judgement from the Court Case that found against Marta Andreasen if you CLICK HERE and follow the links in context or go directly to the Judgement HERE

Ashley Mote’s offence was a financial overclaim on state support resultant from ERM – long before his involvement with UKIP.

As for Tom Wise and his association with Lindsay Jenkins you may find the facts if you CLICK HERE of some help. The source documents show clearly the signatures of Jenkins & Wise that were used as the instruments of fraud resulting in money laundering for which Tom Wise was sentenced to two years in prison but served only from November to May to then be released to enjoy the fruits of his criminality and of course his bloated EU MEP pension.

Nigel Farage took no meaningfull action against Tom Wise when he knew of his criminal activities and it was about 3 years later that Tom Wise’s membership ran out and despite approaches from UKIP he refused to renew his membership immediately prior to the EU election as he knew he had all he might be likely to get from UKIP & The EU as an MEP.

Mr. Dugeon’s letter to which Chris Hallam refers is of course utter self serving bunkum and fundamentally dishonest – consider the fact that Nigel Farage did all he could to shelter his doxy Annabelle Fuller when she was caught criminally in breech of the Data Protection Act, he took no action against Mark Croucher when the Courts found against him, further Farage continued to employ Croucher.

It is worthy of note that Gawain Towler was formally de-sel;ected by UKIP but reinstated despite his utterly inappropriate sexual behaviour by Farage.

There are of course many other examples of outright dishonesty and rank hypocracy from UKIP leadership and the scum gathered as their praise singers and parasites as most articles on this blog seeking to Clean-Up the party to make it electable show.

It is sad that to date we, the true supporters of the principles and beliefs of UKIP’s informed membership have spectacularly failed to CleanUp the Party as the public are aware as shown by the risible 3.01% of the public who voted for UKIP in the General Election.

Nikki SINCLAIRE’s Accounts Make An Example For UKIP’s Trash!Perhaps Marta Andreasen Could Take Lessons and avoid The Courts Branding Her A Liar every time!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

I had a feeling that it might be unwise to publish this singular example of efforts at transparency and probity of just one MEP ahead of The Sunday papers 😉

To be fair since her election to the EU farce Nikki Sinclaire has kept or at least has had help to keep records as accurate as possible for publication to her electorate to show where her income and expenses have been spent, squandered (we all make mistakes!!) or invested.

She is the ONLY UKIP MEP to ever place on record, in public, fully auditted accounts.

Many will remember the promises made by Nigel Farage on his own behalf and that of HIS Party that all elected officers and representatives would account their expenses and income – to date well into his third term on the gravy train all we know in terms of honouring the promise is a pack of outright lies.

We have discovered through no accounting made public that he has made well over £2,000,000 over and above his expenses, we have discovered that he pays his wife from funds available to HIS Party some £30,000 a year,

We have ascertained that his office in Lymington in one year alone failed to plausibly account by virtue of a £6,000 payment to an auditor for over 50% of its income a sum spent on ‘Other Expenses’ of £211,000,

We have ascertained that a sum of £250,000 was paid by Farage into an off shore account titled Farage Educational Trust.

We well remember the claim that the various Ashford scams were described as ‘The most profitable thing UKIP had ever done’ yet we are informed by the then Party Chairman that less than 15% but more than 10% of the money garnered through this very profitable activity ever reached UKIP.

We know and have the account details for a sum of £250,000 paid into a private bank account from this income.

We have shown that not only was the fund raising excercise subsequent to Ashford, Ramsgate, based on Ashford and thus no doubt equally successful was not only not transparently accounted but the Treasurer at the time the duplicitous and untrastworthy Spanish MEP Marta Andreasen claimed to have no knowledge of the income let alone expenditure!

We do not know whether the credit card income of Ashford laundered through Graham Booth’s now defunct hotel facility was ever included in The Ashford money or was surplus to the 10% or so that ever found its way to UKIP possibly making even more of a liar, fraudster and theif of David Bannerman than we all know him to be.

Obviously one could go on with further gross breeches of trust, fraud, money laundering and the like – however to date Nikki Sinclaire is the ONLY UKIP MEP who has made public auditted accounts – to be fair Mike Nattrass now that he has left the scum that for the racist backbone of UKIP as members of The EFD has presented accounts, though as yet unaudited.

We noted that despite £1/4 Million Pounds of public money being taken to mount a Petition by David Lott, Nigel Farage & Mark Croucher – no petition EVER materialised despite further fund raising yet shortly after David Lott moved to bigger premises and Mark Croucher, having told everyone how broke he was, bought the leases on TWO pubs which due to his incompetence went bust – trying to refinance himself he obtained the help of UKIP to try to bankrupt me but when he lost in Court and was admonished by The Judge and ordered to pay costs the duplicitous dishonourable piece of filth in true UKIP style showed complete contempt for British justice.

UKIP have a moral debt to me of £12,500 which they lack the integrity to pay – Mark Croucher has a legal debt of £8,500 + the additional costs I incur in obtaining the money plus I believe a reasonable interest and I understand there is no limit to the costs incurred if legal nor statute of limitations. UKIP leadership its staff and parasites really are scrofulous filth just look at them and the way people like Denny, McGough, Skeptyk, Croucher, Clarke, Tom Wise, Reeve, Malcolm Wood, David Bannerman, Stuart Parr, Stuart Agnew, Gawain Towler, Baron and the rest of these nasty self important little creeps behave in public endlessly bringing UKIP into disrepute – what an odious dishonourable crew!.

I also note that in one quarter alone Nikki Sinclaire donated to UKIP more money than Farage has ever donated to UKIP!

You will note on close inspection that Sinclaire has spent ALL of her expenses on legitimate expenditure and has PERSONALLY funded a market over spend of her expenses as largely invested in The Petition and Constituency work from her private purse.

I appreciate this may be paultry over the years relative to the amount some MEPs in UKIP have invested in themselves and campaigning to get themselves onto or back onto the Gravy Train or elected to an office they would rather hold. Having worked for The Party for some 16 years it would seem that Sinclaire has not spent money on her own campaigns to get elected but rather on campaigning to Leave-The-EU.

A rather different situation to the other MEPs including those who are already Multi Millionaires!

As the end of the year approaches and as my office are preparing the paperwork for an an audit. This exercise has been made difficult due to a substantial amount of paperwork being stolen from my office at a similar time to an ex member of staff also leaving.

It dawned on me that I have not made available the first year figures.

The figures below relate to July 09 to June 2010 incl`

General Expenditure Allowance First six months have been audited

Received £44,131.42

Spent £66,084.77

Overspend £21,953.35

Travel to and from the Parliament I have used the exchange rate of 1.17

€33,921.81 / £28,993

Distance Allowance received €9,263.50 / £7917.52

Daily Subsistence allowance

102 days @ €298 = €30,396 / £25,979.49

Article 22 allowance (extra travel anywhere in the world) This allowance is worth €4,148 pa. I have not claimed from this allowance. I did travel to Cuba for four days on a ongoing investigation regarding EU expenditure at a cost in excess of £2,500. I have personally funded this.

Article 23 allowance (Travel within member state) I have claimed £4,732 for the above period.

From 1st April this year I have been entitled to my ´4000 budget` worth €3604.66 per month From July to March I cannot account for as Nigel Farage MEP controlled this budget on my behalf. I did not receive a single penny nor was I informed (despite several requests) of the expenditure.

You will find other account details on Ms. Sinclaire’s web site I believe see: CLICK HERE

Let us hope that her accounts reflect well in The Press relative to MEP’s incomes and abuses expected on Sunday.

I gather there have been some difficulties in presenting these as accurately as possible in the light of a dishonest staff member who sought to capitalise on a position of trust who is currently under investigation by OLAF and who was for a time denied access to handling of money prior to their departure. It is believed and understood by The EU authorities that there would seem to have been an attempt to use false accounting to entrap Sinclaire for the personal gain of said individual and when said individual departed a report was made to the Police regarding missing material!

Interestingly this information was ‘conveniently’ supplied to the media some 8 months later to seek to damage Sinclaire and the work she is doing to acquit her duty to her electorate and to strive to leave The EU, amongst other ways by The Petition as featured CLICK HERE.

Surprisingly despite the dishonesty and abuse by Nigel Farage, The Harrassment based on her sexual orientation as an homosexual by Godfrey Bloom and others, the time wasted by other MEPs still in UKIP ensuring they squander their ‘Lunch Money’, the gutter snipe Croucher searching the sewers he inhabits for any damaging material to ingratiate himself with Farage, The dishonesty lies and dishonourable behaviour of the then puppet leader Lord Pearson, the criminal instructions of Christopher Gill to gain access to and steal material from her office.

Sabotaged, sneered at and regularly abused by UKIP Leadership, dishonestly and corruptly debarred from use of UKIP style, pernicious removal from General election roll subsequent to considerable donations to Party Funds to assist in the election across the country.

Endless underhand and overt attacks on the members forum by an ex staff member encouraged by others, defamatory and distasteful comments from the pond life that are UKIP’s praise singers on Anthony Butcher’s squalid forum such as filth like Skeptyk with over 1400 postings none of any constructive value all seemingly seeking to attack anyone who shows UKIP leadership to be venal, corrupt, racist, dishonest and liars – mostly written in the style of Mark Croucher, Annabelle Fuller and similar filth that have been the constant contacts in the press office – hence clearly the party seems to have more lies on the Television and radio from Farage about having sacked Tom Wise or in attack on his own associates or discussion of the size of or deficiency of his genitals and the frequency he displays them and how much he can or has drunk than a single solitary item showing competence or gravitas, progress or effort of ANY meaningful benefit.

Or the serial denigration of Baron von Idiot who admits he knows nothing much of UKIP yet serially attacks Sinclaire in the most tasteless and cowardly manner.

There is little doubt that UKIP has been hugely damaged by the postings and behaviour of the trash of UKIP like Skeptyk, Baron, Denny, Stuart Parr, McGough and the other filth seeking preferment in UKIP sheltered in cowardly anonymity in their support once on the staff it seems!

It would be hard to imagine a more unpleasant collection of people to hold office or responsibility in any administration as they industrial;ise the process of theft and louch behaviour beset with their dishonorable and endless betrayal of the values of these United Kingdoms for their personal gain.

UKIP has proved catastrophic for the EUroRealist movement and even the EUroSceptics of any self respect or integrity in the main find them hard to stomach – Whilst the peoples of Britain would seem to present some 75% who would wish to disassociate from most of the EU project and a majority would wish to leave all together UKIP musters 3.01% of the vote as no one of any stature or reputation will go within a country mile of them!

UKIP are just the sweepings of those with adequate greed but no principles that any other parties would wish to associate with save the racist, anti Jewish, Holocaust denying, sexually intollerant, Nazi praising, violent xenophobes of The EFD – now we note Farage is prostituting the party to secure his position and income by wooing the Polish extremists! One wonders how much of UKIP’s 4000 account £76,000 per MEP in the EFD group will be used to bribe them let alone the travel money from the 6000 budget and the rest will go where exactly – at least Sinclaire receives hers and accounts for it and we must presume Farage will have to accurately account for the £76,000 a year he was receiving on her membership up until she quit his sordid and corrupt group WITH, YES WITH Lord Pearson’s PROMISE she would not be penalised for her principled stand.

Yet still Sinclaire is doing more than every single UKIP MEP in The EFD Group it would seem save Godfrey of course who is seeking points for himself but failing to tell the people of Witby the truth! I note he makes much of signing petitions for the Witby Fleet – when will he be honest enough to tell them neither he nor the whole of the British Government will make one wit (Witby) of difference.

Before Britain joined The Common Market / EEC Witby had around 120 fishing boats working full time and fully crewed in its fleet and a flourishing fish market – so what is the Fleet Godfrey that you are making much of saving?

Yes Godfrey 4 part time boats! You must be so proud to tell the people of Witby that you are of some relevance – when will you tell them the truth? But of course just think of the benefits of NOT telling them – you can go on collecting €400 a day lunch money for being just passing flatulence – an irrelevant irritant on the arse of EUrope.

Why not get some lessons from Sinclaire rather than just make a fool of yourself licking Farage’s backside and befouling the name of Britain with your drunken whoring and childish behaviour.