Last month, Abdel-Magied even used the ABC to proclaim Islam as “the most feminist religion”. Forget Saudi Arabia. Forget the niqab. Forget what the Koran actually says. LIAR!

The ABC’s apologetics became even more absurd a week later, when Keysar Trad, president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, confirmed on The Bolt Report that the Koran instructed men to beat disobedient wives.

To be fair, he insisted that this was a “last resort”.

But this startling contradiction of Abdel-Magied’s claim that Islam was “feminist” was ignored by every one of the ABC’s current affairs shows and main radio presenters.

Meanwhile, the ABC’s news website carried no fewer than four more stories attacking Christianity and Catholics.

Other Left-wing media, including The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, and Guardian Australia, also refused to report Trad’s comments, even though federal ministers were condemning them.

These journalists would seemingly rather protect Islam from scrutiny than protect women from a beating.

At least the ABC’s head of editorial policy, Alan Sunderland, admitted in a Senate hearing that the ABC’s lack of reporting “wasn’t good enough”.

Both claims are false. As I’ve explained in a recent column, there is no proof anywhere of either allegation, meant to portray mainstream Australia as riddled

with vicious racism.

Yet not a single Canberra reporter called Shorten out. I assume most thought his vile falsehoods true.

Likewise, virtually no journalist or politician dares acknowledge there is no proof, either, of the “stolen generations” — the 100,000 children the Human Rights Commission claimed were stolen from their parents by officials just because they were Aboriginal.

To this day, not a single activist has met my challenge to name even 10 such children, yet we have the “stolen generations” now being taught in schools.

The Way I See It.......the Leftist element infesting Australia use this as a way to poison any love of this country.

What a way to teach Muslim children th using this ais country is contemptible, and to teach non-Muslim Australians it’s not worth defending.

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

By David Horowitz
As I predicted in "Big Agenda"
– my bestselling book about President Donald Trump's plan to save
America – the Democrats and their media accomplices have declared
all-out war on the Trump White House.

Under the guise of "resistance" – as though the Trump were
the head of an occupying army rather than an elected president – they
have set out to destroy his administration.
They are not "sore losers," as many had surmised when their
hysterical attacks on Trump as an American Hitler began. They are an
army of saboteurs bent on destroying the government the voters
preferred. Traitors is a more accurate word.

Their general, Barack Obama, is an unrepentant radical who
abused the office of the presidency when he was in power, and as
ex-president is now leading a war to overthrow his successor.

With the election over, the Democratic Party is now in the
hands of the Bernie Sanders-Tom Perez-Keith Ellison-Barack Obama radical
left. Abetted by a corrupt media, funded by the anti-American
billionaire scumbag George Soros (below), egged on by Obama's corrupt attorney general,
Loretta Lynch claimed Gen. Michael Flynn as their victim. With the help of a collusive press, the left has launched vile and
violent demonstrations in the streets, rancid witch-hunts in the halls
of Congress

posing as "confirmation hearings," and treasonous
intelligence leaks, which have already claimed Trump's National Security
Adviser

Their next target, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is already
in their crosshairs, the object of character assassinations by DeadShits Sens.
Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and other Democrats,
and by their disgraced and disgraceful media accomplices.

Find out Obama's next attack on Trump – More Info in "Big Agenda" – See More Here
For none of this would have been possible without the active
collusion of The Washington Post, The New York Times, and the media
networks that have promoted the false narrative of an alleged collusion
between the Trump campaign and the Russians to fix the election.

There is zero evidence of such collusion but plenty of
evidence Obama and his cohorts have disregarded the Constitution and the
law to spy on reporters they do not like, to use the IRS and other
government agencies to take down their opponents and undermine the
democratic system.

As I explained "Big Agenda: President Trump’s Plan to Save America,"
the source of this civil war mentality is a profound rejection of the
American idea. This is the idea we are equal citizens regardless of our
origins, and we are accountable as individuals for what we do.
The left's creed – identity politics – is an anti-American,
racially charged determination to reject individual accountability and
individual freedom, and to establish in their place group privileges,
and racial/gender hierarchies.

These hierarchies are based on the malicious premise that
whites, heterosexuals, and males are oppressors and – in the words of
the Democratic platform – America is a society governed by "systemic
racism," which needs to be fundamentally transformed.

This collectivist, racial creed is the heart and soul of
today's Democratic Party and its allies in the mainstream media. It is
the inspiration for the war Democrats have declared on the newly elected

government of Donald Trump.

In his inaugural address, Trump addressed the war in uncompromising but thoroughly American terms."Through our loyalty to our country, we will rediscover our
loyalty to each other. . . . When you open your heart to patriotism,
there is no room for prejudice. . . . Whether we are black or brown or
white, we all bleed the same red blood of patriots, we all enjoy the
same glorious freedoms, and we all salute the same great American flag."The Way I See It........this is the American creed, and it is the voice of the American people who elected Trump in November 2016.

Monday, April 10, 2017

One
of America's oldest Islamist enemies, Omar Abdel Rahman, popularly
known as the "Blind Sheikh," died February 18 in a U.S. federal prison
after nearly a quarter century behind bars. Though he did incalculable
damage to our security during his illustrious career, he also taught us
three valuable lessons, even if we're reluctant to fully apply them.

First, Abdel Rahman showed us how devastating an impact the arrival of just one unvetted Islamic militant can have.

This piece of Islamic-filth, Abdel
Rahman, was an esteemed scholar of Islamic jurisprudence before becoming
spiritual leader of Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, a violent offshoot of
Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood, during the 1970s. In 1981 he was jailed for
issuing a fatwa authorizing the murder of Egyptian President Anwar
Sadat. Released three years later, Abdel Rahman played a major role
recruiting mujahideen networks fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan
and has often been credited by Osama bin Laden with inspiring al-Qaeda.

Abdel Rahman showed us how devastating the arrival of just one unvetted Islamic militant can be.

Despite
being on a U.S. terrorism watch list, Abdel Rahman entered the United
States in 1990 after obtaining a tourist visa from the U.S. embassy in
Sudan. The State Department soon realized the mistake and tried to
revoke the visa, but Abdel Rahman successfully fought deportation.

Why a known terrorist and sworn enemy of the United States was granted legal resident status is unclear. Some attribute this to a "tragicomedy of errors by American immigration authorities," while
others maintain the CIA helped secure his residency status because it
thought it could keep an eye on him and obtain useful information.

The
second lesson Rahman can teach us is about surveillance. After being
insufficiently vetted, Abdel Rahman began preaching at three mosques in
New York and New Jersey, attracting a growing body of recruits and
directing them to plot a spree of terror attacks on New York City
landmarks ranging from the United Nations to the Lincoln and Holland
tunnels.

Abdel Rahman was insufficiently surveilled both before his arrest and after imprisonment.

These activities eventually brought Rahman into the FBI's crosshairs (owing to the courageous informantEmad Salem), but

Emad infiltrated the Blind Sheikh's terrorist cell.

not in time to detect and stop the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that left six dead including a pregnant woman.

In
October 1995, a federal jury convicted Abdel-Rahman of numerous
conspiracy counts pertaining to World Trade Center attack and these
foiled plots and sentenced him to life in prison.

Having
been insufficiently surveilled before his arrest, Abdel Rahman was then
insufficiently surveilled after imprisonment. Though the terror
mastermind was subject to a Special Administration Measure (SAM) that restricted his contact with the outside world to legal counsel, the FBI did not begin eavesdropping on Abdel Rahman's conversations with his radical leftist lawyer, the ugly scumbitch Lynne Stewart (photo below) and their handpicked translator until 2000, after it came to suspect
(correctly) that he was in communication with IG leaders abroad.

Lynne
Stewart, who passed away March 7, left us her own lesson: Never
underestimate the willingness of radical leftists to become knowing
dupes of religious reactionaries (provided they're Muslim).

Through messages passed by Stewart (later convicted for her crimes) to and from IG liaisons, Rahman transmitted directives
to and received reports from terror operatives abroad. He reportedly gave the order for a 1997 attack in Luxor, Egypt, that killed 62 people, mostly foreign tourists.

The
third lesson that Abdel Rahman can teach us is that the criminal
justice system is the wrong instrument for handling international
terrorist cases, especially those with high-profile defendants.

Escaping
the death penalty for a lifetime in prison, Abdel Rahman became a
powerful symbol and inspiration to Islamists everywhere. Bin Laden
issued numerous calls for Muslims to avenge their "sheikh."

The criminal justice system is the wrong instrument for handling international terrorist cases.

In a 1998 interview from the bowels of his cavern hideaway in Afghanistan, bin Laden held
the USA "responsible for its attack on that symbol of Islam, Sheikh Omar
Abdel Rahman."

Bin Laden's successor, another piece of Islamic-Shit, Ayman al-Zawahiri, urged Egyptians to kidnap Americans in order to trade for him.

The Way I See It........while the debate over Donald Trump's pledge to "keep radical Islamic terrorists the hell out of the United States"
rages on, the press, Congress and the American people would do well to
remember the life and lessons of Omar Abdel Rahman.

Saturday, April 8, 2017

Society frowns on physical and emotional abuse disguised as discipline, yet the modern hands-off approach to raising and educating children isn't working either.

Where once kids were caned for misbehaving in class, these, days they are praised for simply turning up to school. We've gone from one extreme to the other.

In the decades leading up to the 1995 banning of corporal punishment in Queensland government schools, were children more inclined to respect, if sometimes fear, their teachers? Did they feel similarly about police officers and others in positions of authority, including parents and grandparents?

In trying to atone for past abuses that invariably arose when an angry adult meted out too much ''discipline'', we've become too soft on kids.In trying to become our children's friends, we've blurred the lines that must exist if young people are to learn respect for others and take responsibility for their actions.

I hear some principals find it's not the kids - its the parents who refuse to buy into their children's learning. If homework isn't done or behavior is unacceptable, mum or dad either shrug it off or tell the school it's their problem to fix.

A teacher friend at a private primary school says parents refuse to believe their little darlings could do anything wrong. The teachers are picking on their child.

It gets worse. Last year the Queensland government took the unprecedented step of introducing a Respect Our Staff campaign after 150 parents were banned from schools because of violence or threats of violence. It's not surprising, given such brilliant role modeling by these types of ignorant filth that in the same years 174 teachers received compensation after being assaulted by students.

Child psychologist Dr Michael Carr (below) says the trend of ''wussifying''children has reached the point of ridiculousness. We have created ''a wave little princes and princesses who know no boundaries and never hear the word 'NO'. We see their tantrums in airports, restaurants, and shops and they are often pacified with an iPad or phone game,'' he says.New research from Harvard University says narcissism is bred early as adults fail to admonish children and instead shower them with hollow praise. This leads young people to think they are better than everyone else, and that rules or social mores do not apply to them. This cannot end well.

Here we are in 2017, with a generation of young Australians struggling on many fronts. As acedemic standards slip against international benchmarks, violence is on the rise. Figures from the Criminology Institute shiow teenagers aged 15 to 19 are the nation's most dangerous people, carrying out the greatest number of bashings, robberies, abductions and sexual attacks.

At the same time, suicide rates among 16 to 24 year olds are at their highest in 10 years. In most cases the wussifying reaches a tipping point where these children can't accept the world is not the way they want it and they are not the center of attention to maintain their high degree of self-esteem.

Some people blame the obsession with social media and there is evidence that it breeds narcissism and an inflated sense of self at the expense of the wellbeing of others. But I believe it is not one thing,

but a combination of factors that shapes the way children develop.

In the past, as now, parents and educators play pivotal roles, but so does community culture. If society does not value respect and acceptance of personal responsibility, how are kids expected to do so? I am not suggesting a return to the days when children wre beaten for misbehaving but we have to find the right measure of tough love that teaches kids that failure and disappointment are growth opportunities.

The Way I See It.......effective discipline doesn't require physical punishment but it does require setting boundaries and enforcing limits. It means teaching children that Life doesn't always go their way, and that's OK.

About Me

I live up to my name and speak frankly and for the silent majority so as to counter-balance the leftist, political correctness that pervades my country. I do not hold any legitimate racist feeling against anyone but I will always try to put crossed-referenced information on current events in a proper perspective that will allow for better understanding and discussions among people. My use of colourful language only adds to getting my point across. It's still a free country as far as I can see.
To put more it directly:
Freedom of speech is the paramount freedom. Without it, we struggle to exercise our other freedoms. With it, we can fight for those freedoms. It may be offensive, insulting and make some governments uncomfortable, but if this is the price to be paid for living in a society where all claims are open to question, then it is a price worth paying.
Feel free to join the I.P.A., the Institute of Public Affairs to help preserve the ideal of freedoms we are now enjoying.
Please note: Feel free to make a comment if you find it interesting and/or entertaining.