From Guantánamo, Shaker Aamer Tells His Lawyer Disturbing Truths About the Hunger Strike

2.4.13

As part of my coverage of the huge, ongoing hunger strike at Guantánamo, I’m delighted to make available the full text of a statement (actually an affidavit) made by Clive Stafford Smith, the director of the London-based legal action charity Reprieve, based on a phone conversation that Clive had on March 29 with Shaker Aamer, the last British resident in Guantánamo, whose story has been a focus of my work for many years. See here, here and here for reports made available to me by Shaker last year, and see here for an e-petition to the British government calling for renewed action to secure Shaker’s release — and here for an international petition.

As I have been reporting for many weeks (see here, here, here, here and here), the hunger strike began two months ago, in response to the renewed ill-treatment of the prisoners and their despair at ever being released, after President Obama promised to close the prison and then failed to do so, even though 86 of the remaining 166 prisoners — including Shaker — were cleared for release, at least three years ago, by an inter-agency task force that the President established shortly after taking office in 2009.

Shaker’s testimony, via Clive (and available here via Reprieve), adds important, and disturbing new information about the hunger strike, and the behavior of the authorities, as well as providing numbers — Shaker told Clive that there are “130 prisoners total on hunger strike in the whole prison,” and that, “Of the 66 prisoners in Camp V, 45 are recognized as being on strike, though more actually are doing it.”

I am an attorney licenced to practice law in the State of Louisiana, as well as the United States Supreme Court and various other inferior US courts. I have been licenced to practice law since 1984.

I am currently the director of the London-based legal action charity, Reprieve. I am a dual US-UK national. I have been representing prisoners in Guantánamo Bay since 2002, when I was working in Louisiana. I continue to represent a number of prisoners there.

On Friday, March 29, 2013, at approximately 11am EST, I spent ninety minutes on an unclassified phone call with my client Shaker Aamer, whose Internment Serial Number is 239. We spent most of the phone call on the subject of the hunger strike.

Shaker gave me a detailed chronology of what is happening. I set forth my notes on our conversation on this subject below. When I use quotes, that is my best reconstruction of what Shaker reported being said, but it is clearly not verbatim. I regret that I have not, given the time constraints, been able to check my notes and my memory with my client, but I am confident that my notes are as accurate as I could reasonably manage.

I should note that I concentrated on matters that took place after my last call with Shaker, which took place on March 1, 2013.

February 6th: The incident with the Qur’ans began the current problems at the prison.

February 7th: The hunger striking began.

February 15th: They came to Shaker’s block in Camp V. (Note that I am generally not allowed to identify cell locations on a call such as this.) They FCE’d him (this means that they conducted a ‘Forcible Cell Extraction’, which is the current euphemism for sending in what has been known as the ERF, sometimes called the Emergency Reaction Force). They FCE’d the two others there also. They FCE’d all three men during prayer time. All three were injured in the FCE assault. One of the three was rendered unconscious and was taken to the hospital, where Shaker understands that he remained unconscious for four days. He is still in the hospital today.

March 12th: They came again to Shaker and FCE’d him during prayer time.

March 15th: The sleep deprivation began. The guards on the night shift began a concerted effort to make sleep difficult.

March 18th: The sleep deprivation got much worse. Shaker was moved to another block, with another person who has been a striker for many years. Shaker was placed in the first cell on the block which is designated for disabled prisoners, and has not been used for several years. It is only a few feet from where the guards use the toilet, shower, eat and so forth.

The female psych who calls herself ‘Helena’ came to see Shaker. He had just been moved to the noisy cell, and she asked him whether he planned to “harm himself.” He does not talk to those among the psychs who are only taking part in the abuse, so he did not initially respond to her. However, she went on to say that guards had reported that he wanted to harm himself. Shaker did reply then, as he did not want this excuse to be on the record for further abuse of him. “I have a wife and kids and I expect to be released sometime in the near future as I have been cleared for more than five years. It is not me who wants to harm me, but the Administration that is harming me.”

Shaker lodged a complaint with her about being in the new cell, as it is made for a disabled person (“I am not disabled yet”), and is too noisy for sleep. He pointed out that if the guards were genuinely concerned about him self-harming, there was an observation cell half way down the block with a plexiglass door where they could monitor him 24 hours a day, and where he might be able to get some sleep.

‘Helena’ said to Shaker that this was “not my business.” Shaker replied that it clearly was — he was being abused and denied sleep. She has not returned since that time.

March 19th: Adel Hakeemy (ISN 168) from Tunisia, also a Reprieve client, attempted suicide. He was being held where Shaker “used to be” (I understood this to be Camp V Echo, which is the most abusive of all the cell blocks in the camp — Shaker has detailed the mistreatment unique to this block in our earlier conversations). Hakeemy was taken to hospital and only returned on March 28th. He has been brought back to Camp V Echo again, which is obviously the worst thing they could do with a detainee who has been self-harming. Shaker asked that we get something done about this as soon as possible.

Shaker lodged an official complaint with the OIC [officer in charge] about the sleep deprivation. He pointed out that he suffers from tinnitus and that they have known for many years that he is a very light sleeper and has sleeping problems. There are 12 empty cells in the block, so he could be moved to any of them and the noise problems would be at least reduced. However, as of March 29th, there has been no response to his complaint.

Shaker reports that there is a new “Code Matrix” being used in the camp (i.e., Code Yellow means that someone has collapsed from the hunger strike, Code Snowball means that someone is committing self-harm, Code Orange Crush is where there is a open door for some unauthorized reason, and Code Matrix is apparently what they are using to avoid cameras and FCE teams). The evil impact of these codes is that the guards rush in and assault people without the normal cameras that are used with the FCE team (which, in theory at least, record what is done to the detainee).

One prisoner was subjected to the new Code Matrix for being “in possession of a bottle of water” and was beaten up without cameras.

There is also a new practice that has been brought in which involves using a dog leash on the detainees. Normally, they would have the hand and leg shackles (which are still in use) and the hands would be held by a guard from behind as they walk (or, more generally, push) the detainee along. But now they are attaching a cloth dog leash to the waist chain, clipping it on as they might an animal. A Sergeant tried to make Shaker a victim of a Code Matrix today when Shaker refused to have a dog leash, and be treated like an animal. However, in the end they backed off and went for the FCE team.

The authorities have begun a concerted campaign to FCE prisoners in a more abusive way. Shaker had been conducting the non-violent protest that he has done for many months (sitting in the Rec yard and asking to stay there for a week as a protest against the fact and conditions of his confinement; on this day, Shaker added the demand that he should be moved out of the noisy cell as well). This non-violent protest is essentially the only protest available to Shaker. For the months gone by, the FCE has been done the regular way, but they have now started a new method, which is being applied to all prisoners except those being taken to hospital.

The new FCE method is as follows: they no longer use the board, but they have six large people who come into the area where the detainee is and shackle his feet, and his hands behind his back. They then lift him up “like a potato sack” and simply carry him to where he is being taken (in Shaker’s case, through six or seven doors, about 150 yards to his cell). This is excruciatingly painful, particularly because of Shaker’s long-term back injuries (which were originally caused by mistreatment by the US in Bagram Air Force Base).

Two Generals came to visit Camp V. (Shaker believes, but cannot be sure, that one was Gen. John F. Kelly, currently head of Southcom.) There was an entourage with them. Just before they arrived, an ambulance pulled up outside the camp, with doctors, nurses and a stretcher. They were in civilian clothes. They had all sorts of equipment, including an oxygen tank.

They loaded a man with a light beard who was not a detainee on the stretcher. He had no cuffs, but was just strapped down to the stretcher so that he would not fall off. They carried him out to the ambulance in full view of the generals, and drove off towards the hospital. This was all an act for the generals to try to impress them with how good everything was. (Shaker believes that, if challenged, the authorities would state that this was a normal thing — perhaps a training operation.)

Shaker reports that visitors are coming by the camp every two or three days, as there is a concerted effort to convince people that treatment is fine. In truth, in the daytime it is much quieter, as it is mainly at night that the worst abuses happen.

“The Night Shift are back on ‘Miller Time’ [what Shaker calls the behavior and strategies of General Geoffrey D. Miller, in 2002-03]. They are stomping up and down the tier, talking, singing (one woman in particular), doing the garbage, banging the doors which are hydraulic and make a very loud slamming noise 20 or 30 times a night, dragging chairs around, crashing about with the ice chest. They have brought a big fan back to make noise.”

It is clear to Shaker that there are particular orders for the Night shift to do all this. For example, only the Night Shift does not use the board; the Day Shift still does. Shaker demanded why they were not using the board to carry him after what the doctors had said about his back. He was told that there was no rule requiring them to use the board.

Shaker has a good relationship with some of the guards, and NCOs have told him that they do not want to do it but they have to.

Shaker is also concerned that they are doing all they can to cover up who is committing the worst abuses. The number system was instituted seven years ago or so in order to allow the prisoners to report abusive soldiers. Various strategies are being used to prevent this now. Although he got the number of one person (the 300 lbs man), by and large he cannot get the numbers of FCE teams as they are wearing white coveralls that obscure their numbers. The guards are also changing their numbers and recycling old numbers from the past.

Shaker reports hearsay (it was said by the Colonel to one of the other prisoners — who does not want his name reported for fear of reprisals) that the Colonel said: “I will bring this camp to how it was in the old times. I’ve got kids at home and I know how to deal with kids.” Shaker is worried for the Colonel’s kids, as there may be a need for social services to check on how they are being treated. [The Colonel is, presumably, Army Col. John Bogdan, who took over as the commander of Joint Task Force Guantanamo’s Detention Group in June 2012, and is blamed for the aggressive cell searches that triggered the hunger strike].

During the visits by outsiders, even in the day time, there are various strategies being used to cover up what is happening. Normally, Shaker reports, the food that was not used was left outside. Now, it is being put in the insulated containers in the block, to hide the fact that the detainees are refusing to eat it. This may, he thinks, also be done to make the smell of food lure more prisoners to go back to eating. Then all the unused food is thrown in the trash, so that the civilians who make it get the food containers back empty, and again cannot report on how much is not being eaten.

The Colonel has ordered other abusive tactics. Shaker understands (and the detainees believe) that the Colonel was deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan before coming to Guantánamo Bay, and is therefore taking a tough attitude, because that is what they apparently did there. He is only issuing half-isomats (three feet long rather than six) and so forth.

March 20th: Shaker complained to the medical corpsman about his abuse on March 19th, and so today he was carried on a board, since the medical officers said that the new method of FCE’ing was not permissible with Shaker because of his back injury.

March 21st: Today, and at all times since, they have reverted to the new method, and have refused to use the board. Indeed, today they introduced a new abuse on top of this. When the FCE team came in to get him, a particularly large soldier, who weighed about 300 lbs, kneed him in the back and held Shaker down with his full weight on top of him. This caused bruises on his back and hands. Shaker showed these to the corpsman, who said he would write it down and follow it up. However, nobody came to see him about his new injuries and nothing has been done.

March 22nd: This abusive FCE was repeated, with the 300 lb soldier. Again he was bruised by the man, and he took down the soldier’s number. This time, they held his hands and his legs, both crossed over, and the man pushed down until Shaker heard a cracking sound in his own back.

Shaker was not permitted to give me the soldier’s number on an unclassified call.

When Shaker sought medical treatment for this injury, he was offered Tylenol. “This is not a reasonable response for that kind of injury,” he said to me.

March 23rd: Shaker began refusing to go out of his cell, as he is very worried about being paralyzed in the same way as the Egyptian and the Syrian [identity unknown], who were paralyzed by the beatings that they got in Guantánamo Bay. (Note: the Egyptian was Sami al-Laithi, ISN 287, represented by Reprieve, who was paralyzed when beaten in the hospital.)

March 25th: At 14:05 today Shaker was visited by ‘Dr. Cordelia’, who is one of the pleasant medical personnel. She said he was now recognized as a striker, though they had refused to accept that before. She told him the impact of the strike, reading off a piece of paper about how his kidneys might fail, he might go blind, he might cause permanent brain damage, and so forth. She said that he needed Thiamine, medication for his muscle spasms, and nutrients like honey and Ensure.

Since March 25th, Shaker has been visited by a doctor or a nurse every day. However, they are doing nothing. He has lectured them all on how they are violating their medical ethics by taking part in the gratuitous mistreatment of the prisoners, but they have told him that they are following “orders from on high.”

March 29th: 04:00 they did a Code Matrix on one of the skinniest hunger strikers (now 107 lbs) who had a Tupperware box with him. He had tea in the box and they did a Code Matrix call on him. In the end, rather than be beaten up he gave it over to them.

09:15 With his phone call, they did not tell Shaker the night before as the rules require. They told him only at 9:15am that they would be coming immediately for him. As a result he had not been able to prepare to tell counsel about the details of what was going on. However, there was an “operational delay” in the call — which Shaker reported as being a flat tire on the van — which allowed him time to gather his notes up and prepare to speak with counsel.

“Last night was one of the worst,” Shaker reported. A Hispanic female was singing much of the night. The noise from next door in the toilet was constant and loud. Shaker got almost no sleep.

Shaker has lost 32 lbs as of today. This is necessarily an estimate as he is not being accurately weighed, but he considers himself an accurate judge of his own weight after the hunger strikes he has been on. His hand is shaking almost permanently because of the hunger strike.

Shaker has been badly punished for joining the strike. He has been denied various things that were ordered for medical reasons including his second isomat (for his back), his blanket (for arthritis), his knee brace (for his knee injury), his back brace (for his back problems), and the pressure socks that are meant to help with the edema in his feet. He even went ten days without being allowed a toothbrush.

He has also been denied the medically ordered second bottle of water. In Camp V (as compared to Camp VI, where apparently bottled water has been cut off altogether) there is a new rule that they are only allowed one bottle at a time — whether they are using it for coffee, for washing for prayer, or drinking.

All the spices that Shaker had collected were thrown out; apparently there is a policy of throwing out the spices that detainees got through the ICRC.

There is currently a policy of nobody in authority talking to prisoners about their complaints. Shaker has asked to see the OIC, the AOIC, and so forth, but none will come, as the NCO reports them as saying it is not their responsibility.

As of March 29th, Shaker reports that there are 130 prisoners total on hunger strike in the whole prison. Of the 66 prisoners in Camp V, 45 are recognized as being on strike, though more actually are doing it (Shaker was only recently recognized himself). Shaker reports that 15 of them have blood sugar levels below 40 mg/dl. There is one prisoner with a blood sugar level of 17 mg/dl. Seven detainees are in hospital.

The authorities are playing with the prisoners’ weights. They use the big scale now, and they weigh the prisoner with shackles, and often immediately after they have drunk a lot of water. They hide the weight reading from the prisoners, so there is no saying what is written down, though they sometimes say what it is. Shaker reports various ‘miracles’: With one prisoner, who weighed 127 lbs last week and has not eaten in the interim, they said he was 140 lbs.

Shaker understands that one detainee is reportedly 85 lbs; another 107 lbs; and a third 117 lbs.

Shaker estimated that he is 158 lbs, down from around 190 lbs when this began. “You can see the bones in my chest. My body has taken a lot of shock.” He is taking two or three spoons of honey a day to try to ameliorate the worst impact of the strike on himself, as his body had suffered a great deal of damage over the past eleven years.

Between six and ten detainees are ‘falling down’ every day. They are told that this is because their blood sugar levels are between 20 and 40 (mg/dl). If this happens, they are being strapped to the board, and told that they have to take a mixture of honey and water. They may be left on the board for several hours until they agree to take the honey and water. They are using this method rather than the tube and the chair.

Prisoners are being mistreated in gratuitous ways, in addition to the mistreatment of Hakeemy (ISN 168). For example, the paralyzed Syrian has been denied his wheel chair for 6 weeks now. He is being isolated in Camp V Echo and he is there without his chair.

Notwithstanding this, Shaker reports that the detainees are more together than ever they have been, as they are determined to fight the abuse they are suffering through a non-violent hunger strike.

While I would obviously prefer that Shaker Aamer should be permitted to testify to the facts that he related to me himself, the foregoing is as accurate an account as I am able to produce from my notes of my conversation with him about the current state of the hunger strike in Guantánamo Bay, and the unfortunate response by the authorities to it.

Thanks, Amy, Clark, Tenzin and everyone who has liked and shared this – and so swiftly. It really is of great importance. Amy, you’re correct to express disbelief that it doesn’t have people out in the streets protesting about the manner in which the prisoners are being treated. What’s depressing is that, although activists know this, the ordinary man or woman in the street doesn’t, as you point out, Clark, so that they are still led to believe the “worst of the worst” propaganda that was pumped out by the Bush administration. Sadly, while people were able to accept the horrors of Abu Ghraib when they were first revealed nine years ago, too many people who should know better have erected barriers in their minds to prevent themselves from seeing the truth about Guantanamo.

Dog leashes around waists, playing with weights, gratuitous cruelty, arbitrary brutal forced cell extraction, sleep deprivation, where to begin? Prison authorities can’t say they’re doing this to break prisoners for “intelligence”, b/c most of these men are cleared or never charged. So I have to assume they’re doing this to break the hunger strikers.

Thanks, Mui. That’s a good, succinct recap of the abuses mentioned by Shaker, and clearly what’s happening is an attempt to break the hunger strike. it’s also important for people to recognize that similar abuses have been part of the authorities’ arsenal throughout Guantanamo’s history, not just during the official torture years (2002-04), and now, but whenever prisoners, singly, or in small numbers, or in other large hunger strikes (like the huge hunger strike in 2005), resisted their oppression. It’s similar to how all US prisons operate, of course, but it’s important for everyone to remember that when the authorities talk of the Guantanamo prisoners, there has been no acceptable, transparent or fair process to determine whether these men had any connection to terrorism (beyond a handful actually accused of terrorism) or of taking up arms against US forces. They haven’t had trials. They haven’t been convicted. They haven’t been sentenced in a court of law. The supposed evidence has not been adequately tested.

Yes, Mui, that was the only point at which I smiled. Laughed, actually. Shaker has retained his sense of humor. I am full of admiration for his stamina, but it is not enough to just admire him. He must – must – be released. The excuses for not doing so are as disgraceful as disgraceful can be.

There’s no way that the Tories in charge of the sinking ship that was the UK care one jot about the Guantanamo prisoners, Mui. We have a home secretary – the moral quagmire that is Theresa May – who joked about how great it was to get rid of five terrorists to America when Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan (British citizens) were extradited with Abu Hamza and two other men – not only prejudicing any chance they might have of a fair trial, but also showing thorough race and religion-based disdain for the lack of a reasonable case against Babar and Talha in particular.
And then, immediately after extraditing five Muslims, she refused to extradite two white men.
Some of us are looking for access to the administration, Mui, trying to find a sympathetic ear. It’s not proving easy, but we must persevere. And the more people recognize that Obama’s inertia – however understandable it may or may not be – is absolutely unacceptable, the more pressure we create.
Men who may have done nothing, who in some cases clearly did nothing, who have never been tried, and who, in 86 cases, were told that the US government had no wish to hold them forever, are being held forever, are being brutalized, even tortured, to stop their hunger strike, even though that hunger strike is a recognizable and understandable cry of despair.
On what basis is any of that even remotely acceptable?

Thanks, Mui. I like your optimism. I must admit it was unexpected! As for Theresa May, the human settlement has not been created, and nor can it be, where she does not look like a racist monster. It is what she is.

If Colonel Bogdan was the Colonel who said “I will bring this camp to how it was in the old times. I’ve got kids at home and I know how to deal with kids,” perhaps someone should contact the Child Protective Services where his kids are, and have them determine whether he is a fit parent.

I don’t know if I mentioned Robert Rapley’s book before, “Witch hunts: From Salem to Guantanamo”. There are important parallels between those old style witch hunts and how the captives are treated.

When DCI George Tenet was interviewed on 60 minutes it sounded to me as if he saw himself as a kind of designated vengeance extractor, rather than a sober, rational intelligence chief.

Back in 2005 I saw a brief (20-30 seconds) clip of an interview the BBC did with a young guard at Guantanamo. Maybe, in an attempt to humanize the place camp authorities authorized guards to be candid.

Anyhow, I remember him telling the BBC that the main frustration of being a guard was that guards weren’t really allowed to retaliate against the captives the way they would like. I guess he expected the BBC interviewer to say something sympathetic, in reply. As there is about five seconds when he doesn’t say anything. Then, in an angrier and more defensive tone, he said, “Half of these guys killed a US soldier.”

Of course Omar Khadr was the only captive explicitly accused of attacking a US soldier, and 90 percent of the captives saw their first soldier when bounty hunters or Pakistani security officials handed them over.

This comment bugged me, and a month or so later I checked, to see how many US soldiers had been killed in Afghanistan. It was only 192 at that point. So, his claim that half of the captives killed a GI was shockingly unbelievable.

When the Colonel said he was going to return the camp to the old times I think this implied he was going to build up the guards’ morale by lying about how dangerous the captives were.

Lying to the guards, about how dangerous the captives are, to keep up their morale, turns the guards into designated vengeance extractors, and the whole camp into one big Milgram experiment.

Maybe the Colonel had served at Guantanamo under Miller, as a more junior officer?

As to whether the Colonel was Bogdan, I think it is possible it may not have been. If I am following the transfers accurately, the camp commandants cycle through at one per year, and with the exception of Miller, they are all one-star flag officers. The Colonels who command the Joint Detention Group are all senior, possibly their last gig before retirement. And they serve multi-year gigs. The guards are on shorter gigs, 6 months, or one year, and are rotated in and out on a battalion basis, with their own C.O., who I think would be a Colonel or Lieutenant Colonel. So, it is possible the child abusing Colonel may be the C.O. of the new guard battalion.

But it is more likely it is Bogdan, who seems to have been prepared to have been highly misleading before the Military Commissions about whether the captives’ meeting with their lawyers were being actively monitored.

Thanks, arcticredriver. Great comments as usual.I haven’t read Robert Rapley’s book, but I believe the witch hunts are a powerful analogy for what has happened since 9/11 to prisoners seized in the “war on terror.”
Great stats on the deluded rationale for treating prisoners in an inhumane manner, and one that I think prevails from the military (where people are told not to question authority) to the American public in general (also told, essentially, not to think independently).
As for Bogdan, I think it’s him. he’s been in the job since last June, I believe.

A live stream would be great, Clark. I also hope to visit the US again this year. I only normally visit in January, for the anniversary of the opening of Guantanamo, but I think I deserve some warmer weather! I have friends and colleagues on the West Coast, so if you know of anyone who might contribute to a plane ticket, maybe we could get a visit organized.

If I remember well, Obama did promise to close down Guantanamo and get everyone there through the Justice System during his 1st mandate. Frankly that type of treatment is barbaric even for cattle, let alone human beings.

Obama promised to close the prison, Myriam, although he didn’t specifically promise to get everyone through the justice system. Rather, he set up an inter-agency task force to review the prisoners’ case, and to advise him whether they should be tried or released – or, alarmingly, whether they should be held indefinitely. After that, obstacles were raised, both by the President himself, and by Congress, but he needs to find the courage and the will to revisit his promise, and to make good on it – first of all by releasing the 86 men cleared for release but still held.
I also agree with you, Myriam, that the treatment of the men is barbaric.

Thanks, Louise. Far too many people trust that those in power have their best interests at heart, when it’s simply not true. Those in power are in the service of the banks and corporations, one of whose interests is the business of war. People need to become aware of the creeping advance of fascism over the last 12 years, but I don’t know what it will take to wake them up to it. Perhaps when some other “enemy” is treated as disgustingly as the Muslims rounded up and used as experiments in horror since 9/11.

[…] Reflecting on this, on how pretty this country is, there is one thing that really makes you sad, what U.S. did to them, how they destroyed their whole history and what they left behind… Thinking of Guantanamo Bay. U.S., U.S. … stop spreading your evil everywhere. Shut this detention camp down ! There is a need for all of us to react… The prisoners there have been on hunger strike for many days now … You can read this article on that subject : From Guantánamo, Shaker Aamer Tells His Lawyer Disturbing Truths About the Hunger Strike […]

[…] There is a need for all of us to react… The prisoners have been on hunger strike for more than 50 days “in response to the renewed ill-treatment of the prisoners and their despair at ever being released, after President Obama promised to close the prison and then failed to do so, even though 86 of the remaining 166 prisoners — including Shaker — were cleared for release, at least three years ago, by an inter-agency task force that the President established shortly after taking office in 2009″ as stated by Andy Worthington in the following article From Guantánamo, Shaker Aamer Tells His Lawyer Disturbing Truths About the Hunger Strike […]

Thanks also to everyone who has liked and shared this. It has 725 likes right now, which is very encouraging. Through the men at Guantanamo laying their lives on the line, we are seizing the initiative on Guantanamo from those with power and influence who thought they had consigned the prisoners to oblivion.
Plus, if you want your voice to be counted, please join the “Close Guantanamo” campaign that I run, and that I helped to establish last year. Just an email address is required: http://www.closeguantanamo.org/Join-Us

Thanks again, Elizabeth. I’m thinking that it’s probably time to try and initiate a petition to President Obama formalizing the three requests we made at “Close Guantanamo” in February, asking President Obama to:
1: Lift the ban on releasing any of the 56 cleared Yemenis from Guantanamo, imposed in January 2010.
2: Appoint a new person to deal specifically with closing Guantanamo, to find new homes for the cleared prisoners in need of assistance.
3: Take the fight to Congress to stop treating the cleared prisoners as pawns in a cynical game of political maneuvering, and to clear the way for all 86 cleared prisoners to be repatriated or safely rehoused in other countries.
If anyone out there has any ideas for who to approach – or experience in this sort of campaign – and you want to help out, please get in touch!

[…] as the warden, he is in charge of the guards). See, for example, this parenthetical statement in an Andy Worthington post describing information he got from Shaker Aamer’s attorney: The Colonel is, […]

Leave a Reply

Investigative journalist, author, campaigner, commentator and public speaker. Recognized as an authority on Guantánamo and the “war on terror.” Co-founder, Close Guantánamo, co-director, We Stand With Shaker. Also, singer and songwriter (The Four Fathers) and photographer. Email Andy Worthington