How can we be certain that our eyes do not deceive us, as they so often do? How can we be sure that what our senses tell us is actually real? And how can we trust anyone that simply dismisses such enquiries, when others wholeheartedly believe they already know the truth? In short, we cannot.

When we trust, we are taking a leap of faith. We extend a curtesy to a stranger that may be our salvation as much as they may be our undoing. If it goes horribly wrong, you can be certain that you’ll be reminded of the fact often enough… If it doesn’t, many will make certain that you know it should have done. On reflection, one cannot win nor lose, only learn from experience.

When circumstances feel as if they’re turning into the surreal, like the current political situation…We can be guaranteed that our intuition will lead the way to the truth, as long as we don’t live in a world of wishful thinking. No matter, for as long as we cannot see our internal and external reality for what it is, we may never realise the truth… In fact, our view of reality is more likely to shatter into countless pieces than be reconciled with the bigger picture.

Although we may never truly know anyone, we cannot spend our lives in distrust for something that has happened or might happen. We must learn to live in the present moment, if we wish to know the truth about our multi-dimensional reality, in which time is a mere sequence of moments interpreted by our consciousness. On a deeper level, time represents change. (In Sanskrit, they even share the same word.) This leads us to the question, how can something feel real, when in truth it is not?

Our senses can trick us into believing almost anything. Therefore, it is our responsibility to apply critical thinking to discern the real from the unreal. That being said, there is a simple rule, when questioning reality: If it is finite, it cannot be infinite. (Its source may be, but the object and/or subject is not) This rule of thumb makes things easier, but it can still be very confusing when putting theory into practice. In other words, that which is real cannot be manifest in relative existence, outside of the realm of self-realisation. Conversely, that which is unreal cannot be manifest in the absolute, or ultimate, reality.

For what it’s worth, religion may guide you in your search for deeper meaning, but it cannot lead you to enlightenment via a path that has been taken by others. Only a handful of practices are common denominators shared by all enlightened spiritual teachers, which are deep contemplation, meditative concentration and gratitude. The path to self-realisation is uniquely tailored to you. You cannot walk it in the footsteps of another or in honour of an ideal that was corrupted long ago.

Beyond ego and appearance, we are all one in heart, mind and spirit…We originate from the same source. Regardless of our religious traditions or personal beliefs, we share a universal spirit that has its roots in pure consciousness.

Religion has become an all-encompassing system that functions in all essence like a corporation. The Vatican, for example, is an arms stockholder and a bank with great influence in the corporate community. Our modern representation religion has strayed far from its intended purpose…It no longer serves as a voice of reason or compassion, but detachment from the people that it serves. Corruption in any institution can only take hold, if organised elements within it act on delusional beliefs that do not benefit the greater whole. Although many religious scriptures are hardly embodiments of peace or provide more than a handful of useful principles, not all of them have been edited, suppressed or destroyed. Some still offer guidance toward understanding a higher power…an essence that existed prior to this multi-verse.

Featured

“Can you step back from your own mind and thus understand all things? Giving birth and nourishing, having without possessing, acting with no expectations, leading and not trying to control: this is the supreme virtue.” (Lao Tzu)

We are a diverse, multi-cultural world. We are all a part of a global community that we all help shape…We are one people that cannot be separated by religion, colour, creed or race.
You may worship as you choose, but as soon as you infringe on the religious freedom of others, there’s hell to pay… Equality is a two-sided coin. That means Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Christians and Muslims have to respect each other with equal measure. There is no ‘one true religion’…There are only paths to self-realisation. Paths that we should be able to choose freely ourselves, according to what resonates deep within us.

Islam does not differentiate. Like the Christians of old or the Sith…Islamics deal only in absolutes. Since the religious system abandoned concepts that allow critical thinking and independent judgement, it has become a religion of genocide. An archaic, outdated system that still strives to take all things for themselves and rewrite our history to make it theirs.

How long can a religion based on femicide last? How long until there’s only a few hundred thousand women? How long until there’s just a handful? In every religious state, women are prized possessions. Yet, in those that view them as second class citizens, a large majority of women are kills before they even reach the end of puberty. In more civilised areas, they are given to suitors as children and are simply discarded or divorced once they are too old for their acquired tastes. Generally, this happens between the age of 15-16. Approx. 4-6 years after they were forced into a sexual relationship.

In 2013, men outnumbered women on the planet by roughly 58 million, according to the World Bank. In January 2015, men outnumbered women by 60 million. In fact, China has around 50 million more men than women, and India 43 million. This accounts for 76% of the male surplus worldwide. Russia have it totals up as a global excess of 60 million. Countries in the Arabian peninsula are the most unbalanced. (Qatar was is of the most extreme examples, with women making up less than one in four of the population)

Only one year later, this dynamic has radically changed. One year later, men now outnumber women by approx. 110 million, as a result of millions of unnecessary deaths, involving women. (Due to the lack of statistical data in certain countries, this number represents a gross estimate of how the global population has changed from the end of 2015 to the beginning of 2016) This radical shift has many contributing reasons, such as the preference of men over women, which leads to gender selective abortions and female infanticide. However, the root cause behind this worsening gender imbalance, as a whole, is femicide (which includes honour killings, executions, massacres, stonings, beheadings etc.)
In Arab countries, men heavily outnumber women as a control factor. The protocols that women are not permitted to leave their homes unaccompanied were originally intended for the use of religious scripture during wartime. It has no use outside of the Jihad, which leads us to my next point. During an Islamic takeover, women represent the future generations of the enemy. The customs of radical Islam is to rape and kill or force women to breed in captivity. Regardless of their skin-colour or country of origin, the freedom of women is at great risk with the rising influence of Islam over the West.

Before the migrant crisis, every second murder of a woman (in Germany) was committed by a spouse. Every fourth women is suffering from or experienced domestic violence… The migrant crisis is bringing all of this to light by showing us where we are headed, if we do not get our priorities straight. Yes, women have equality in the West, but we still earn less…Our vote is ignored just as intently as that of a man. Worse yet, we are abandoned even by our gender.
Each time we stand up for the religious freedom of Islam, as women, we are betraying our own kind. In other words, we dishonour and disrespect the heritage of every woman, who has come before us. Women, such as Curie and Nightingale, made astonishingly great strikes for womankind, and how have we repaid them? By taking all the freedom that we have fought for, and using it to abolish our democratic rights!

How many women have died to protect the freedom of all women? Not as many as are about to once again.

Historically, each time men outnumber women across the globe, there are socio-economic repercussions. What accounts for this current growing imbalance is the surplus of young, unmarried male migrants. Not to mention that Islamic leaders across the world are encouraging 4+ children. Countries, in which contraception and childlessness are punishable offences, greatly contribute to this massive population growth by adding to numbers that are already unsustainable.

Hypothetical: A friend of mine asked me about a week ago, “what would happen if radical Islam were to take over the planet?” The global number of women would be significantly reduced within less than a year. During the first year of a religious takeover, the casualties would be extremely high. Millions, if not billions would easily lose their lives for being outnumbered from the beginning. In the second, there would be a period of coercing conformity. Again, millions would die for either failing to do so, being unable to and from general maltreatment. Religious commitment can be very much like a compulsion… It wouldn’t matter if they knew that they’d be killing the last woman on Earth, they wouldn’t be able to help themselves. It’s that obsessive compulsive nature and lack of forethought, which could drive the number of (men and) women down to less than a million in very short time. Not to mention the global institutionalisation of peadophilia as well as underage marriage that’d contribute to the death of billions annually. If that level of femicide continued unchecked on a global scale, in less than 3 generations, there would only be a handful of women left…until the point where the majority of men could spend an entire lifetime without ever having laid eyes on a woman.

As stated in one of my earliest posts, an overwhelming majority of women under Sharia Law do not reach the end of puberty. Often they do not reach an age, at which their body can handle pregnancy. Simply because some women menstruate at a younger age does not mean their bodies are equipped to deal with pregnancy. Maturing is a complex process for men and women alike. In fact, the rate of complications is astoundingly high. That notwithstanding, the earliest age to facilitate a pregnancy with a manageable success-rate is 14, but the death-toll in medically unequipped countries is considerable in comparison to the West. As a side-note, in a rape culture, medical services are more equipped to deal with underage pregnancy. Considering the number of 14 year olds that abort or carry the child to term in the United Kingdom is the highest in Europe already without an unrestricted migrant flow.

BenefitsFraud: All over the world, pensioners receive payments without the need to attend the. Jobcentre or Welfare offices on a weekly basis. As decent as that may be for an elderly lady with only one decent working hip, there’s only one problem: Anyone can sneak in, dispose of the body and keep cashing the checks…And this is exactly what has been happening few and far between. Contrary to popular belief in Western societies, as the age of a sex offender goes down the age of the victim goes up. This often does not apply to crimes of opportunity.

ChildAbduction: Since the surge of economic migrants, the number of attempted and actual abductions on playgrounds, school properties and the open road have risen exponentially. Do not let your child or teenager go out on their own! And even if you accompany them, anticipate trouble. The current locations to beware of are playgrounds, schools, swimming pools, beaches, hiking paths, mountain walkways and other family destinations.

Younger and older generations need to pull together avert more hate crimes aimed towards women. We are mothers, wives, sisters and daughters…and we need to stand together, because deserve the right to be safe inside our homes and step outside our front door without fear of victimisation…without becoming a target of cultural gender-bias.

Why do all the feminists and anti-feminists either fall silent on the migrant crisis or embrace economic migrants without consideration of the tangible consequences. Is it hateful to close your door to an extortionist, sex offender and/or religious fanatic? No, it is common sense.

It has been a well known fact for many years that we live in a rape culture. However, the migrant crisis has changed the situation to our disadvantage. It has highlighted how exposed women are to sexual misconduct on a daily basis.

What happens when an invading force with an obvious gender bias and known history of genocide expands their territories? History repeats itself. After the war-crimes committed on every single minority known to mankind, white genocide was only a matter of time. That notwithstanding, this article not about our karma. Every culture is at risk. Our very heritage is threatened with extinction from three sides.

Jihad: Despite the endearing efforts of the West to keep the peace by opening their doors and their hearts to the migrant population, no country can sustain the vast numbers that are currently residing and/or successfully head for Europe. Only a small number of families manage to escape for a better life… The large majority of the migrants are single, young men between the ages of 18-25. An army that propagates faster than any other since contraception according to Sharia Law is punishable by death, one might say.

Elite: War of any kind means good business and hefty profits for ‘someone’, particularly if they sell to both sides and purchase the real estate after a bloodbath. However, at least when the cogs of war are manipulated in such a fashion, one may almost have a fighting chance. What we are currently facing is an army, while knife and gun bans are enforced on a trial or permanent basis. The deck is visibly stacked against our favour at each and every turn.

Nature: The Sixth Mass Extinction is creating severe resource shortage. However, our damaging resource production and its unequal distribution is only one factor contributing to civilisation collapse. Temperature fluctuations, natural disasters and so forth.

Throughout recorded history, entire countries have faced shortages of women, which often led them to seek opportunities elsewhere. At times, women were permitted to choose, such as with the Spartans. On other occasions, women were simply raped and forced to breed in captivity. This commonly occurred, when there were underlying reasons behind the before-mentioned lack of women: (1) rare gender-focused disease that ravaged the region (2) preference of boys over girls, hence female offsprings often met a premature death (3) violence & genocide

For example, before Siciliy was invaded, they were a fair-haired and fair-skinned people. After countless women were raped and impregnated, following the invasion, fair-skin, dark hair and blue eyes became a prominent genetic trait from that region. Just like the Spanish exterminated the Tainos, raping the black and Indian women, creating Latinos.

The history of violence against women is a long one, yet there is only one course of events that keeps repeating itself over and over again. Each time, countries under Islamic Law face a massive shortage of women, as a result of executing their own before they have children, they are forced to expand their territories. It should be noted a significant portion of women are killed before they even reach the end of puberty.

“In politics, if something doesn’t go the way you want, shoot someone. It works every time. Just like it did with the London Riots…Just like it’s working now. As long as there’s a patsy, no one cares who’s actually behind it all.”

Over years of working with chronically and/or terminally ill clients has taught me this without question…We are all responsible for the way we die, for the friends that guide us along the way and our enemies that may hasten our demise. We are the creator of our own life in the way that we conduct ourselves. We often forget that we created and shaped this world according to a particular vision, but images change. We change. At times, what we create backfires and end up with the exact opposite result.
The fact is that we cannot win against nature. We cannot contain, compartmentalise or eradicate it, we must learn to live with it. Our survival depends upon it in more than a thousand ways. Pollution has a death toll that amounts to billions. Cancer, cardiopulmonary obstructive disease, cardiovascular disease and many other conditions are only a byproduct of a deeper root cause: Terra-Forming (this includes automated and genetically modified food production in controlled environments)
It is an old concept that was recently re-termed as ‘geo-engineering’, it implies that the chemicals in the atmosphere, lands and the oceans can ultimately change a planets physical nature. Altering the nature of other plants to support human life has been an ongoing thought since space exploration became a physical reality. However, what this means for us is far less conventional. That which was once lush and green with fresh air becomes an accumulation of toxic fumes that cannot escape and are not absorbed with oceans too acidic to touch or nourish any plant life that we’d recognise.Reality-Check: During the California drought, residents were miles from water, thirsting to death, while the wealthy minority of the state received lorry-loads of brand-label bottled water. Even evaporating the water would not have removed the pollutants in it, making it too toxic for consumption. This is just an example of what happens during a drought in the modern world. Without an ample supply of food and bottled water, which is never guaranteed when there’s a global shortage, the life-expectancy of the average person drops fast.
In comparison to other celestial bodies, our atmosphere is becoming similar to that of Venus. A rather neglected planet, perhaps even ironic with mankind’s history of suppressing feminine qualities. With 93% of carbon dioxide, some nitrogen, and very little water vapour (00.3%), it serves as the perfect atmosphere for other forms of life. Simply nothing humanoid.

Engineering Planetary Environments

Facing the reality of our situation, we could terra-form other environments or we can fix our own. No alien species will want humans out there, we dissected their people and stole their technology, so postponing that idea isn’t really an option. It’s the only rational choice, we have…Not that it’ll stop some people from trying.
That notwithstanding, an empty, habitable planet would be hard to come by, even outside of our solar system. Mars would only come close to being habitable, if we altered the trajectory of ammonia-rich asteroids that exist in the outer solar system to hit Mars and release ammonia.
“Ammonia probably would last less than a century in the atmosphere, meaning that the impacts would have to continue to be effective. Given that each impact would have a thousand times the energy release of the largest bomb ever exploded, this could be problematic. One possible way around this is that there are bacteria that produce ammonia out of nitrogen and water. If the ammonia atmosphere were set up once and the bacteria put in place, a self-sustaining ecosystem might be possible.”
Collisions with asteroids or comets will provide liquid water via their impact, but the primary purpose of the continued bombardment would be to raise the temperature of Mars by about 4 degrees. However, ammonia rich asteroid collision and use of bacteria to grow a self-sustaining ecosystem that can sustain human life would still be the slower route. One that we could not accomplish before mass extinction.
So, we have gone the full circle back to the problem of the sixth mass extinction. How can we reverse the damage? In practice, we can only do so much. We could re-freeze the ice-caps, but our primary concern is the continued fossil fuel usage and natural DC field disruption. Those two are the lynchpins of pollution. Without them, we are a new level of technology that no longer requires to use of money or weapons.

Hemp for the Planet & Marijuana for the Spirit

Marijuana was America’s number one analgesic for 60 years before the rediscovery of aspirin around 1900. From 1842 to 1900 cannabis made up half of all medicine sold, with virtually no fear of its high. In 1973, the possibility existed that once the active ingredients in cannabis (such as THC Delta-9) were isolated and correct dosages established, cannabis could become a miracle drug. Twenty-nine years would pass, however, before American scientists could begin to even look into cannabis medicine again.
“Our current fossil energy sources also supply about 80% of the solid and airborne pollution which is quickly poisoning the environment of the planet. (See U.S. EPA report 1983-96 on the coming world catastrophe from carbon dioxide imbalance caused by burning fossil fuels). The best and cheapest substitute for these expensive and wasteful energy methods is not wind or solar panels, nuclear, geothermal and the like, but the evenly distributed light of the sun for growing biomass.” (Emperor Wears No Clothes)
Hemp stems are 80% hurds (pulp byproduct after the hemp fibre is removed from the plant). Hemp hurds are 77% cellulose – a primary chemical feed stock (industrial raw material) used in the production of chemicals, plastics and fibre. Depending on which U.S. agricultural report is correct, an acre of full grown hemp plants can sustainably provide from four to 50 or even 100 times the cellulose found in cornstalks, kenaf, or sugar cane.
It is public knowledge that we are a couple of years away from using up all the fossil fuel that we have located thus far, changing over to hemp kills two birds with one stone, as it could tackle the resource shortage globally in a single year, but only if we can modify the temperature, which leads us to our next point.

The Industrial Complex

The only way to reverse climate change is to re-model the industrial complex from its roots upward. Although this is often a rather brutal, long-winded process, whether it follows legal perimeters or not. However, there are only a finite solutions to this problem that have or will not be provided by the individuals responsible.
Islam: The Islamic faith is currently attempting to destroy the Western industrial complex, yet this will come at the price of lives and freedom, if they manage in time…I doubt mass extinction would quench their thirst for the blood of the infidel. All the men were taught is war, all the women were brainwashed into is submission. Society could crumble around them, for them that changes nothing. There can be no peace in such a religious state, only mindless obedience. Yet, that has never stopped the cogwheels of war from churning into place.
Moreover, in their eyes, climate change is punishment for not covering more to their faith…For not building more mosques…For the ‘evil’ ways of the West. The excuses are endless. It is such a shame that their ignorance prevents them from seeing that we have always used developing countries to do our dirty work. We don’t build factories that pollute the air on our doorstep, we exploit other countries to do it on our behalf. (Like we hired their people to commit atrocities in the name of terrorism, so leaders can implement policies against the people with their permission)Non-Violent Resistance: There is no such thing as non-violent resistance. The act of resistance itself, even in defence, appears invasive to others. That applies regardless of the methods used. I have not seen one peaceful protest that did not devolve into violence. The influence of just a handful of people in the crowd is enough, then the herd mentality takes over. All of a sudden, you are standing in a street as shops are robbed, torched and riot cops are closing in. I have not seen one hunger strike that did not result in nutrient deficiencies. I have not seen one close attempt at changing the world that did not involve threats of assassination or financial ruin. So, don’t think for a second that resistance is easy. Resistance invokes aggression in those that don’t share your views…Whose life almost depends on you sharing theirs, because not to share theirs represents a threat to their world-view. (Please see http://www.aforcemorepowerful.org/resources/nonviolent/methods.php)Boycott Fossil Fuels: Fuel poverty is everywhere and it will continue to grow…It will continue to change our environment and our atmosphere. Whether we can own up to it or not, the lack of plant life with this much methane and CO2 is poisoning us.Boycott Mainstream Media: Every news article has its purpose. It’s not only to inform but to shape public opinion by the way it informs you of a certain thing. For example, by using the word “victim”, the broadcasting service is more likely to inspire sympathy. Every image and every story is carefully selected to manipulate the masses through propaganda, but they often show their hand through that which remains unreported. More importantly, although there may be millions of news providers, but they are all my owned by 6 corporations on a global scale.Boycott Pharmaceuticals/Vaccinations: Big Pharma has a long history of being addictive and chemically synthesised. We no longer live in a day, where anyone can walk down to the pharmacy and pick up the cleaner version of cocodamol. We can no longer see or even use the plants that once cured us, unless we cultivate them ourselves. (Besides, they’re going extinct, which makes it rather difficult to treat anyone when doing so would drive us and them into extinction sooner or later.) Nowadays, we have to worry about rat poison in medication, or the fact that a simply jab may turn our child into a drooling, non-verbal autistic. Moreover, we abuse the medication that we still produce from plants. Opioids were often used in combination with cannabis, then the individual would be weaned off heroine or morphine through marijuana by passing the nastier aspects of withdrawal. A method favoured by the Native Americans and other shamanic and/or indigenous cultures.Ban Processed Food/Water: Toxic chemicals, including excess fluoride, GMO and over 30’000 additives and preservatives, are associated with long-term health consequences. Unless you eat fully organic, or grow your own, the probability is that you’re affected by the consequences. These free radicals are not merely addictive, most of them are carcinogenic, so think about making your own oven-baked fries from fresh potatoes before stopping by McDonald’s, Burger King or any other Fast Food Joint. That shit will fuck you up and get you hooked enough not to care.Use Environmentally-Friendly Tech: Although there may be ‘no evidence’ linking mobile phone use to cancer but we know the towers cause it, so it’s not much of a stretch to suspect the lethal effects of modern technology. Disease is a natural byproduct of D/C field disruption in humans, if exposure is prolonged. Over time it becomes not only hereditary but continues long after the next level of technology has been released to the public 30-40 years after its been patented.Forcing The Release of New Technology: As this is a rather vast subject, I will be writing a separate piece on the matter. – What if I told you that you could have grown up with holograms, flying craft and hydroponic gardens like you’ve never seen them? You may call me crazy but what’s life without a little fun. There’s only one rule when it comes to the research developments of the elite and the universe as a whole: if you can imagine it in your mind, it exists. Anything is possible, even your own worst nightmare probably exists somewhere. All of our personal hells can be found if we look hard enough. That notwithstanding, we can equally create a sustainable paradise of equality, harmony and global peace by removing poverty, religious laws, disease, wealth and resource inequality. We have the technology to do so now, but one would never guess with the current state of affairs. There’s no profit in such a world, but in ours it is all there is. To the point, there are several ways to accelerate the release of technology, but each one leaves no other choice than radical change:Money: By purchasing the next level of technology, a new model is released. It’d take billions to drive the releases to a point, where a changeover takes place…And there are always repercussions when you hijack someone else’s timeline. Everyone that has tried is pretty much bankrupt, dead or sold out under pressure.Space-Travel: Apart from covertly reconstructing the Vimanaika in the back-garden shed, civilian attempts to construct craft and head into space generally end in bankruptcy, unless they never make it to the news. Richard Bransons famous attempt to launch paying customers into the stratosphere were equally placed on hold for ‘unexplained’ reasons that are in truth either related to off-planet military projects, aliens or both….Which leads us to our next point:Aliens: By confirming the existence of extraterrestrial life or evidencing first contact happened years ago, one may easily trigger a global evolution in technology. Gods are no longer powerful, non-physical entities, they are revealed aliens that have visited before…This would include unveiling the impact of keeping stolen alien technology hidden and concealing the actual history of the human race.Pyramid Networks: Unburying secrets cities may be risky, but there’s rumoured to be one in the euro-tunnel, if you feel like taking a glimpse and spend life in prison. The only underground networks that are not sealed to the public, inaccessible or guarded are those of our ancestors…And many entrances to known tunnel systems in England are being filled with concrete. It should be noted that the majority are located on MoD territory, where trespassers are prosecuted. (They also own all of England’s high ground, son feeling from city-wide floods would be an interesting experience that might end with being shot on sight in a state of nationwide emergency)

The idea of the Anglosphere is an important element of British Euroscepticism. Ben Wellings and Helen Baxendale show that calls for unity of purpose between English-speaking peoples offer Eurosceptics an alternative political community to the European Union, and one that aligns history, culture and politics more closely than does Britain’s membership of the EU. Although the Anglosphere does not yet constitute a viable political alternative to Britain’s EU membership, articulating it helps Eurosceptics imagine a UK outside the European Union.

The rise in Euroscepticism within the Conservative Party after 2010 was preceded by a decade of discussion about the existence of the so-called ‘Anglosphere’ as a viable alternative to the UK’s membership of the European Union. Amidst all the searching for Swiss or Norwegian models for Britain’s relationship with the EU, some Eurosceptics advanced the Anglosphere in response to criticisms about the lack of an alternative vision to European integration.

Euroscepticism and the Anglosphere

Speaking in the debate on the Maastricht treaty in 1992, the Conservative Minister for Europe, Tristan Garel-Jones posed the question that always caused some awkward silences amongst British Eurosceptics: ‘Can the anti-federalists, the Euro-sceptics and little Englanders offer a positive alternative?’

Reflecting on this in The Spectator, Tim Congdon floated a response: the English-speaking peoples or what was increasingly being referred to as the ‘Anglosphere’. From the late 1990s, exponents of the ‘Anglosphere’ idea argued that the English-speaking nations are distinguished by a set of institutions and characteristics that the other advanced nations of Europe ultimately lack: a common law tradition, respect for private property, continuous representative government, and a culture that nurtures civil society and entrepreneurial enterprise.

Emerging in the late 1990s, the Anglosphere idea is, in essence, a proposal for an international organisation that accommodates and celebrates the history, culture and institutions that many hard Eurosceptics believe make Britain different from the continent. It is, in short, a mutual political association that variously includes the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, the English-speaking Caribbean islands and Singapore, all dedicated to free trade and greater military and security cooperation that could constitute, in Robert Conquest’s words, ‘a centre of hope in the world … around which peace, cooperation, and democracy can develop’.

The Anglosphere idea has proven attractive to prominent British Eurosceptics. Margaret Thatcher, David Willetts, John Redwood, Daniel Hannan, David Davis, Norman Lamont, Liam Fox, Bill Cash, Michael Howard, and William Rees-Mogg all wrote or spoke in support of increased cooperation across the Anglosphere, with their ideas often published or promoted in Conrad Black’s and Rupert Murdoch’s media outlets.

Britain, Europe and the English-speaking Peoples

Although sentimental ties to the Commonwealth and the wider English-speaking world never went away, the Commonwealth could not provide a viable alternative to Europe in the mid-1970s. But this context changed. As such, Eurosceptics in Britain have questioned Britain’s accession to the Common Market.

Writing from Melbourne in 2013, Boris Johnson spoke of the ‘historic and strategic decision that this country took in 1973’ in which ‘we betrayed our relationships with Commonwealth countries such as Australia and New Zealand’. This betrayal was the product of specific historical circumstances – domestic, European and global – that no longer pertained. Johnson argued that:

When Britain joined the Common Market, it was at a time when the establishment was defeatist, declinist and obsessed with the idea that we were being left out of the most powerful economic club in the world. In those days – when olive oil and garlic had barely appeared on the dining tables of Britain – it was assumed that in order to be “internationalist” it was enough to be European. Well, it is now perfectly obvious that that is no longer enough – and that we need to seek a wider destiny for our country.

The attraction of such arguments was that they appeared to make historic and cultural sense. The Anglosphere suggested that progress could be reconciled with the restitution of a historical wrong and a future for Britain outside the EU imagined amongst a community of English-speaking peoples sanctioned by the past relationships and shared culture. Thus a political choice that seemed expansive in 1973 was perceived as parochial forty years later.

A renewed emphasis on long-standing and stable (if somewhat taken-for-granted) political relations with Commonwealth countries chimed with calls for a political re-orientation away from Europe after 2010. For example, speaking in Sydney only days before David Cameron’s Bloomberg speech on the EU in London, William Hague argued for closer political cooperation between Britain and Australia, exemplified by the on-going ‘five eyes’ intelligence cooperation, the regular ministerial-level meetings inaugurated in 2006 under the name of AUKMIN and the diplomatic and consular cooperation in emerging countries that were already well established.

European Integration and the Anglo-British Past

The strong sense of British difference from the continent that animated many Eurosceptics and Anglosphere enthusiasts was firmly rooted in a particular understanding of Britain’s past, making the Anglosphere the other side of the Eurosceptic coin. John Redwood neatly encapsulated the centrality of this history to hard Eurosceptic thought:

Britain is at peace with its past in a way that many continental countries could never be… We do not have to live down the shame that many French people feel regarding the events of 1940-44. We do not have to live…with the collective guilt that Germany feels about the Holocaust… We do not wake up every morning like Italians to wonder who might be in government today and which government ministers might be charged with corruption tomorrow.

Such a rendering of the past is redolent of the dominant British historiography of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, which uncritically celebrated Britain’s constitutional and imperial achievements and the collective exceptionalism of the English-speaking peoples to be found in David Cameron’s ‘favourite book,’ Our Island Story, by Henrietta Marshall.

In this understanding of the past, the unique British inheritance that makes further integration into Europe undesirable to hard Eurosceptics is the very same inheritance that unites the Anglophone world, rendering deeper cooperation and closer association not only eminently possible but highly desirable. In this way, with the ‘Special Relationship’ at its core, the Anglosphere’s proponents contend it would constitute a more authentic and robust standard-bearer for Western values than a weak and crisis-ridden EU could ever hope to be.

Conclusion

Even advocates of the Anglosphere Association are happy for it to remain just an idea: a gratifyingly provocative retort to the likes of Tristan Garel Jones. An institutionalised Anglosphere Association is unlikely to be realised anytime soon. But the practicalities and prospects of the Anglosphere as a functional entity are not really the main point of interest here. Anglosphere enthusiasm is significant first and foremost for what it says about a certain strand of hard British Euroscepticism and its conception of Britain’s identity and place in the world.

“Germans’ anti-Semitic beliefs about Jews were the central causal agent of the Holocaust. The conclusion of this book is that anti-semitism moved many thousands of “ordinary” Germans, and would have moved millions more, had they been appropriately positioned, to slaughter Jews. Not economic hardship, not the coercive means of a totalitarian state, not social psychological pressure, not invariable psychological propensities, but ideas about Jews that were pervasive in Germany, and had been for decades, induced ordinary Germans to kill unarmed, defenceless Jewish men, women, and children by the thousands, systematically and without pity.” (Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing)

Evil exists in countless forms. At times, we perceive an object or subject as evil as a result of our ignorance towards others and our environment. Venting, for example, is a form of energy transfer that maintains our own limitations, in which we burden others with negative energy after unconscious negative pressure peaks to the degree at which its release can no longer be delayed. Although venting in itself isn’t evil, it is a part of a repetitive cycle, after which unconscious negative pressure continues to accumulate. Similar forms of release are obtained through the execution of violent acts, such as serial rape or serial murder. Similarly, each time the pressure is released in a ritualistic manner, the degree of release is reduced, hence the period of time between violent acts shortens gradually.
In the example of verbal venting, the individual typically does no harm, but often deflects blame and responsibility or ingratiates themselves with an air of powerlessness, regarding a particular problem or situation on a re-occurring basis. The persistent lack of release often sets a cycle of escalating stress and tension in motion, until release occurs. More often than not, individuals around the “venter” are affected considerably more, when no release can be found. In addition, these individuals are rarely the cause of the problem or participate in its perpetual effects. However, the mere fact that they are in proximity of the venter makes them a possible target for irrational criticism, excessive hostility and even the misuse of authority. If a co-worker is involved, employees are often able to formally complain or refuse to work with the individual in question. However, from personal experience, the individual in question is more often than not in a position of power, which is greater than that of the person that has handed in a complaint of some kind against their behavioural tendencies. In fact, many employees would never dare complain against their superiors, no matter how dire the circumstances, as it would worsen their employment status and would most likely result in their redundancy. Is that evil? The truth is that evil is widely misunderstood, due to the fact that it is very much linked to perception. Evil and corruption are concepts that are the subjects of philosophical and political debate and speculation, which may never reach an official verdict for various reasons. But from a moral perspective, to experience evil could be the effect of a cause that has already happened or is yet to become manifest. Similar to the cause for becoming or expressing “evil”.

Virtues have to be protected and maintained. “Evil prevails when good people fail to act”, therefore inaction could be considered a vice, as it prevents the preservation of good. In my professional opinion, anyone is capable of anything within the right circumstances. Rigid morals are difficult to maintain without hypocrisy and/or deeply conflicing ideologies that will inevitably collide. In the modern world, living according to the law does not necessarily mean that one lives ethically or in harmony with one’s surroundings. For example, Greenpeace activists that promote clean living and equality for animals or bomb vacant oil rigs but still heat their own homes with fossil fuels may be perceived in a wide variety of ways by the overall populous. Tabacco, Firearm, Fast Food and Big Oil CEO’s could be perceived as evil, although they are not personally responsible for the consequences of the consumption their products. Although they are not the cause of the problem, they represent darker aspects of free will, which constitutes the wilful addiction to degenerative, highly addictive chemical additives and preservatives. In the greater scheme, they are merely facilitators for a wide range of destructive human impulses. Also, they ensure their immediate survival on an economic and social scale, while compromising their long-term survival on an evolutionary scale, without consideration of the moral implications.

Since the beginning of recorded history, mankind has used psychological reasoning to discern the cause of evil…the cause of violent crime. It is the connectedness of communities and nations that led to the conception of rule and law. Yet, that underlying greed for power was never far behind to hijack its success for the misuse of authority.
More often than not, I am open about my distrust in governments and disbelief in a truly democratic vote in modern society. However, I am not fearful or otherwise emotional as I trust in the process of life. I trust in the fact that any living being is able to alter the course of history. Nothing in existence is absolutely evil or absolutely good. In a dualistic universe, the corrupt politician with a penchant for school boys donates thousands to charity on a regular basis. We are all capable of positive action. It is our thoughts, words and actions that can be considered evil, but our pure essence is beyond description and beyond verbally expressed reach.

Furthermore, the the modern world, it is more financially viable and socially seductive to engage in morally questionable actions. Personally, I have never fully understood the need for power, as the responsibility and potential (for expansion) always resembled a rather great burden that people often do not appreciate, since it encompasses a limited amount of discipline, restriction and self-control, which constrains their current forms of expression. From a wide variety of former employers to choose, some were more comfortable in their position of power, but none were willing to go out of their way to bond with their employees. In a manner of speaking, they were disposable groups of socially segregated individuals that could be replaced at the drop of a hat. This perception will ultimately face a moment, in which they tables are turned. Although they view others as replaceable, their ego often prevents them from perceiving themselves as such, until they are able to rise above their current station instead of being lowered down the social ranks due to redundancy or other reasons for unemployment. Evil begets evil in an endless cycle of evil and reformation for one single reason: Every single individual is good at something, however, there will always be someone that is more capable. In other terms, every predator and every creative genius ultimately meets their match. We are all ultimately confronted with our own misgivings and limitations for the sake of our own evolution. In fact, times of war and perpetual violence fuel creative innovation to cease the fighting through either mass destruction or peace efforts.

For all intents and purposes, I do not believe in a life-review between lives. I believe that the subconscious mind forms a symbolic representation of what they know is yet to come. (In the form of karmic contracts) However, it is highly probable that any karmic contract can be altered, extended or shortened in exchange for something of moral and/or spiritual worth. On a separate notes, order and chaos are only opposites, due to our radically opposing perception of them. Good and evil, chaos and order are means to the same end. They are states of being and perception that become incorporated into our personality due to conditioning and prolonged exposure to them. It is stated into the Vedic texts that cause and effect are one, which in moments of self-actualisation transcend one’s perception of space-time. Once Samadhi is achieved, cause and effect are stated to remain as one, including the irreversible alteration in one’s perception in space-time, often accompanied by the siddhis.
In my professional opinion, our public understanding of true evil is limited by our own emotional and predatorily nature. Humans rarely perceive themselves as the more virulent or cancerous species upon the planet, yet we are. The exact number of mass extinctions caused by humanity is most likely unknown, however, what is known is that they have risen into the billions. We may consider ourselves as morally superior, yet we no longer know ourselves. The majority of the species eats meat regularly, yet we weep and cry out with disgust, if we are asked to slaughter, skin and gut the animal ourselves. Are they evil for the participation in the extinction of countless species? Is the belief in violence in itself a form of evil? Are we considered evil by the standards of other species in the known universe? Conclusively, we consider an object or subject to be evil due to ignorance and lack of understanding as well as empathy. Unfortunate events that may appear to a source of great evil and suffering may in actuality reveal itself as the creator of profound compassion and revolutionary ideas that shape many future generations yet to come. Evil denotes negativity or negative expression and actions. It is commonly defined as immoral and unpleasant, and as a part of a supernatural force. As we already know, everything has a supernatural force with its own needs and desires. In other terms, evil may just be a negative exchange that in the long-term encourages the transformation of consciousness as a whole toward a greater goal, such as unification of the one mind beyond the point of return.

Bereavement is difficult to come to terms with at any time. However, sudden, violent and traumatic deaths are often even harder to accept. It is often accompanied by complicated grief.
– Approximately 765 individuals are victims of homicide in the UK every year.
– Approximately 1,500 women and 4,500 men commit suicide in the UK every year.
– Approximately 2,000 individuals are killed in motor vehicle accidents in the UK every year.
– Cardiac Arrest is the highest cause of sudden death and the second cause of death, apart from cancer.
“A recent study of ancient remains has found that cancer is a man-made disease fuelled by the excesses of modern life. Tumors were rare until recent times when man-made environmental pollution and chemical-laced nourishment were introduced into the food supply.”
Tap water in most countries contain harmful chemicals. Mexico for instance contains more heavy metals, whereas the United Kingdom and the United States have more advanced chemicals that cannot even be removed through filtering (without a carbon filter, which is illegal inside the UK) or boiling. Unsurprisingly, the legal air filters are built in such a way that they cannot be converted into water filters.
We have become accustomed to ingesting poison through our way of life. Conscious everyday choices not only kill the planet, we murder ourselves without being aware of it. Although these chemicals result in countless modern diseases, which perpetuates an outdated system to govern society, they also serve to suppress human evolution and prevent gene expression. As diseases gradually embed themselves deeper in the genetic code through biochemical engineering via chemtrails, food and water and so forth, the nature of the attacks suggests that there is only no way to get away from it. It’s in the air, the ground, the supermarket. Even money contains traces of it through human contact. In the ancient times, the monks that sought to escape societal conventions fled into the mountains. Nowadays, all high ground in the United Kingdom is owned by the Ministry of Defense. In the United States, most mountains are run by the federal government. The National Parks are owned and maintained by the federal authorities also, yet they still have the highest child disappearance rate in the entirety of the United States. There is no way to escape and evade the current threats that society is facing. JFK wisely remarked that “When a peaceful revolution is impossible. A violent revolution is inevitable.” By the time the masses will comprehend the urgency of the global situation, it will be too late. That is how the game was rigged. To distract and divert humankind for as long as necessary, until we no longer serve a purpose and our lives have become superfluous, merely to make a profit. Instant gratification will become our undoing, as a species, since we do not comprehend the consequences of our actions.
War propaganda will serve as a distraction, whilst another war is slowly brewing. The War on Terror, which was merely a ruse to bleed the Middle East’s fossil fuels dry. Peace is a decision. It is an action towards creating harmony. To right a wrong. To correct an injustice. To be afraid of terrorism and bombings simply amplifies our fear of death, as we are confronted with our own mortality, resulting in the inability to cope with reality rationally. The time has come attain emotional freedom. To become part of profound social change and create a new world, in which democracy is a reality rather than a game of numbers. With every passing day, we are sacrificing liberty for a false sense of security. Safety is an illusion. We only feel as safe as we think we are. But in good time, our own mortality will catch up with us.
A US study at the Boston Medical Center and the University of California San Francisco on behalf of The Collaborative on Health and the Environment (CHE) confirmed that “More than 80,000 chemicals have been developed, used, distributed, and discarded into the environment over the past 50 years.” The CHE study known as “Chemical Contaminants and Human Disease” reported “Pollution has been connected to about 200 human diseases, from cerebral palsy to testicular atrophy, and more than 37 kinds of cancer. Even as the disease-rate intensifies, a New York Times article reports Americans’ shunning traditional medicine in favor of $27 billion spent on alternative therapies last year.”
For the last 50 years CIA and US Military biological warfare research focused on the Dengue fever. “As early as the 1950s, the army’s Fort Detrick in partnership with the CIA launched a multi-million dollar research program under which dengue fever and several addition exotic diseases were studied for use in offensive biological warfare attacks. A University of Illinois international law professor Francis Boyle charged the Fort Detrick work would include, acquiring, growing, modifying, storing, packagingme and dispersing classical, emerging and genetic engineered pathogens. Those activities, as well as planned study of the properties of pathogens when weaponized, are unmistakable hallmarks of an offensive weapons program.” (Related Literature: Wanted For Bio-Terrorism, Genocide and Conspiracy To Commit Mass Murder)
How do the pharmaceutical and chemical industrial complexes continue evade prosecution? Lack of Evidence.
“There is a high index of suspicion that an unexpected apparently natural death may be iatrogenic due to the medicines administered before death. The true adverse effects induced by drug interactions are rarely known in the medical community, especially relating to the extremes of age on the potency of drugs. These are biochemical deaths and as such are difficult to prove at post mortem examination, especially if the forensic pathologist has not been made aware of the identity of drugs administered before death. There are far too many Physicians in all corners that continue to use unnecessary drugs without the full awareness of the mechanisms whereby they can become lethal. Iatrogenic causes of death are easily the number killer of humanity worldwide. Iatrogenic causes of death are easily the number killer of humanity worldwide. When any death occurs, the coroner will list the specific cause of death (i.e. heart attack) but never the “cause of the cause” (i.e. statins). Yet the “cause of the cause” is the single most important factor creating illness and death in our society today. The hidden killers that evade detection to protect profits and expand disease are the biggest threats of all.”
It’s not paranoia, when all scientific evidence points to one single conclusion: Genocide out of simple greed and lust for power.
Those individuals do not live within society. You’d never see them in the supermarket or on the television. These are the rich that own greenhouses in remote locations that were purposefully designed and built for them. In the recent years they have becoming sloppy in their approach to disguise the truth in the media, whilst the masses are becoming more relentless in uncovering the truth.

Fact 1: We are destroying the planet simply by following our daily routine.

Fact 2: Our opinions are being manipulated by social engineering.

Fact 3: Those that run and control society are above the law

Fact 4: Those that are above the law control the economy, using the media and politics as a means to coerce conformity and inflict suffering to gain global submission and implement a much more extensive system of control.

Tennessee Williams once stated, “We are sentenced to solitary confinement within our own skins.” In order for an attachment to be formed, the individual has to perceive themselves as being separate from the object or suject. Buddha taught that seeing oneself and everything else as seperate from oneself is a delusion. Furthermore, he viewed it as a delusion, which is the deepest cause of suffering. Meditation represents a means of detaching from sensory perception and opening oneself to the cosmic consciousness that we are all a part of. There is nothing to attach to, as you already are everything. The beggar on the street. The young soldier risking his life in Kiev, as a result of corporate warmongering. The paedophile priest with more sodomised child corpses in his closet than the high powered CEO. A starving child in Africa. Even the corrupt politician and charity owner, stealing millions out of corporate accounts. Evil prevails when good men do nothing. Idleness, ignorance, aversion and the addiction to preference are also considered to be an unwholesome character trait in Buddhism.

Every action has side-effects. Society entered a state of stagnation in the 90’s and is purposefully being kept that way. Any evolution from here on out would break the system. And would you not do anything and everything to protect your way of life?
That which provides you comfort? Or that which you feel you cannot live without?
When you build your entire bloodline around a lie, it is kill or be killed. Yet, these psychopaths prefer a slow death, but they also thrive on knowing more about their targets than they do themselves. Expressions of the genes, which ultimately determine personality, provides detailed insight on every single human being on this planet. There’s no honour in making profit. The more distracted and overwhelmed we are by our personal problems, the less likely we are to focus on global problems. The more likely our opinions are swayed by emotional concepts, the less likely we are to follow through with our main objectives. We are nothing but a tool to them. The means to an end. The genetic manipulation of the species and terra-forming of the planet.
The inhibition of the psychic potential of the species is a vital part of the plan. Since China produced its Superpsychics, more and more individuals are beginning to believe in the existence of psychic abilities. And that is a danger that cannot be controllers by those in power. Those that hold their own armies of psychics. Ultimately, every tool can be utilized for positive and negative purposes.
For every individual that runs from danger, there is another that runs towards it. To understand the true nature of ourselves is to understand the true nature of the universe. Death cannot erase such deeply rooted knowledge. The Buddhist concept of reincarnation differs from the others in that there is no eternal soul, spirit or self, only a stream of consciousness that links life with life. Energy cannot be destroyed, it is merely transformed. The overall amount of energy within the universe is never altered. However, the actually process of becoming again is known as “punarbhava”.
The flames of desire burn within us all. To make a decision and stick to it requires force of will and inner strength, which takes time to develop. Our thoughts, words and deeds carve our fate in stone.
We live in a society where it has become too much hassle to feed the poor and it is easier to turn a blind eye and linger in silence. Death lives at our doorstep and we are blind to it.
The men and women of the modern world should exercise their constitutional right to defend themselves. We are afraid and feel helpless because we have not trained ourselves to withstand adversity, to think clearly and act rationally when our life is threatened. We prefer to dial 911, waiting for the situation to go away, instead of confronting the situation head on, which may cost us our life. When our life is threatened, we are reminded of what we still want to do and what we are throwing away through what seems like bold action. It takes courage to stare in the face of adversity. But in a moment of kill or be killed. That is all there is. To act or die. In the end, you cannot lose anything. Legally, the difference between getting life for murder and being released for self-defence is the justification for the kill. To fight the war in other countries, so we do not have engage in battle in our streets and inside our homes. But those other countries are another human beings home. Those in power are investing billions in creating a problem and providing the solution. There’s hardly any difference between the methods used by terrorists and patriots. “The best defence is a good offence.”, as they say. Yet, you always run the risk of collateral damage or targeting an innocent. Conversely, we have all made mistakes that could warrant our own death due to the judgement of another, whether we admit to it openly or not. There is no such thing as coincidence. The multi-verse is a complex construct that is based upon the law of cause and effect. However, within a dualistic universe, one extreme has to be accompanied with the existence of the other. Concentration camps, for instance, used to be a method of relocation first applied by the British in Africa. The troops were unaware that the rivalries of the tribes over territory had been so intense that simply leaving them in one room resulted in genocide. The British then retaliated with genocide. Although most remember the usage of the camps from World War 2, very few connect the Sandy Camps, which were under martial law and prohibited any media coverage from inside the camps. This was mostly due to countless assaults, rapes, and most likely the odd disappearance or two that was never truly investigated or even reported. History repeats itself, when humankind fails to learn the lesson behind their past. As a species, we are easily distracted and easily fooled by those that guarantee us vague promises that they cannot fulfil by association.

By patenting all alternative energy technologies, when the switch eventually occurs, the sources of energy will be sources of income for corporations controlled by predetermined individuals. A one world banking state will only be the beginning. A one world police and military state. DNA Fingerprinting at birth, birth-tax and birth-licencing. We are no longer born free. We are slaves to a system, in which, if we are not financially viable, we are disposable. Banks earn most of their money by giving out loans. When a loan is issued, the bank digitally produces currency that they charge you interest on. The increasing corruption of the system leaves only two options, space colonisation or depopulation. As we are prohibited from colonising space due to our sociopathic and psychopathic tendencies as a species and we are too greedy at this point in time to make our resources infinite, we are doomed to suffer mass genocide. Truth be told, we have all sold our souls for the lives we lead. We are still guided by false religious dogmas that inform us that nothing, except Dinosaurs, existed before the flood and anything or anyone that says differently simply disappears without a trace. One of our greatest wars is our own history. We are spending billions on erasing our own history to disguise the truth. They like us to believe that land does not change when it moves through the seas. When landmasses collide, they rise and sink. India’s lost cities, for instance, the geological formation of the Himalayas was created by tectonic plates of India and Asia colliding, resulting in numerous ancient cities being buried underwater. It is also highly likely that a part of Japan itself disappeared into the ocean at that point in time. The end result of the current shift of the tectonic plates will result India moving further upward. It is quite safe to assume that Australia and Africa in about a billion years would join become one landmass. Africa originally separated from South America and America from Europe. Our planet has been undergoing massive physical changes since its creation. The tilting of the planet is also taking effect, the strain of the celestial body in space would alter along the sphere. If one takes into consideration the gravitational forces of our planet, the gravitational forces of our own planetary system, the change in position of our solar system within the galaxy (which undergoes a shift every 1.5 billion years). We are on the waves of the galaxy, as it may. If one takes into consideration all the above, then the species can understand that which it requires to do in order to survive and it only leaves two options: To expand or to cull its own. The more you detach yourself from the outcome, the bigger the picture becomes. As the culling process has already begun, the decision has been made, yet it has not been made by the people. In retrospect, theologically speaking, the bigger you see, the more you can achieve. That generally means, if you spend day by day solely thinking about your personal needs. “I need new earrings.” or “I need a drink”, for example, your life is dictated by your personal needs. If you begin to perceive the bigger picture, you begin to think “I need the next step of humanity.” “I need next evolutionary step for humanity.” When you begin to think for the species, not merely yourself, you begin to detach yourself from the self. The next stage is to think not of our species, but all species on Earth. We do not live in balance with our surroundings. The stage following that involves the scientific evidence of alien life and the exploration of planetary bodies. All life within the galaxy should be taken into consideration. If you think planetary bodies, the destruction of Earth would cause catastrophic gravitational disruptions within our solar system, which in turn could result in the collapse of the sun. The inevitable collapse of the sun will ultimately transform it into a massive black-hole, capable of gradually swallowing the Horses Head Nebula.
In conclusion, A pro-survival mentality would, in essence, include two aspects that are vital for the survival of the human race. The down-sizing of the species and the expansion into space, yet both require a measure of balance within the hearts and minds of the species, which we do not possess just yet, but could be established within less than a decade of intense psychological remodelling. To put bluntly, no one likes the feeling of an extraterrestrial peadophile, raping your children and eating them. We are still ravishing the resources of our own planet simply as a means to creature wealth and profit, what would stop us from doing the same to other planets within the solar system, until there is nothing left and we have sealed our own fate.