Mons. Philippe DelhayeSecretary General of the
International Theological Commission

The Holy Father's apostolic journeys throughout the whole world are a
providential and modern form of the cooperation between the Petrine
primacy and episcopal collegiality. The 1985 Synod made note of this in
a most auspicious and pertinent manner (FinalReport, II,
C, 4). Pope John Paul II's third pilgrimage to France, particularly in
the region of Lyon and Savoie, was characterized by the celebration of
the memory of the martyrs and other saints of these regions. The
collection of his liturgical celebrations and teachings forms a
spiritual treasure from which not only the Christians whom the Holy
Father visited but also all the members of the Catholic ecclesial
communion must profit. In order that each one's reflection may prove
truly beneficial, it is undoubtedly opportune to promote a meditative
reading of these texts and to focus attention on the more important
themes. This is what we would like to do as far as the great figure of
St Irenaeus is concerned, taking as our point of departure the
remarkable address of the Holy Father during his visit to the "Facultés
Catholiques de Lyon",

1. The great figure of St Irenaeus

First of all, who is Saint Irenaeus? What was the course of his life?
What are his writings to which the Holy Father referred in particular?

Irenaeus was born in Asia Minor about the year 125. He was still a
young man when he met Polycarp of Smyrna, who represented a generation
which had known the Apostles chosen by Christ, especially Saint John.
"He, the Lord's disciple, the very one who had rested on his breast
(Jn 13:23, 21:20), himself published a Gospel while he was living at
Ephesus in Asia" (AdversusHaereses [AH] III, 1, 1).
In the eyes of Irenaeus, this Gospel, like those of Matthew, Mark and
Luke, is essentially a witness to the Paradosis,to the
tradition which the Spirit had entrusted to the Apostles and their
successors, the bishops. We shall speak of this again later, but for the
moment, we most note that Irenaeus sees himself in continuity with
Polycarp, John and the Apostles and with Jesus himself.

Irenaeus followed Polycarp to Rome in 154 or 155. There he met Pope
Anicetus (155-166), the Christian philosopher Justin and Hermas the
moralist. Irenaeus provides this testimony concerning the Roman
apostolate of Polycarp: "When he had come to Rome under Anicetus,
he turned a great number of people away from the heretics (Christian
Gnostics) and led them back to the Church of God by proclaiming that he
had received from the Apostles just one single and sole truth, that
which had been transmitted by the Church" (AH III, 3, 4).

Who were these Christian Gnostics who were taking advantage of the
Romans' infatuation with Eastern religions? According to Valentinian,
Basilides and Marcion the most extreme dualism was the truth of
salvation. On the plane of sense experience, man is enclosed in the
flesh and the cosmos which are evil creatures of the secondary god who
is the "demiurge". Fortunately, above this world of the "aeons"
and of the cosmos, there is a Supreme God who is not a creator and who
is purely spiritual. This Supreme God had sent the Saviour, Christ, who
had not truly assumed a body of flesh or experienced death; all of that
was a phantom appearance. On the contrary, the truth is that Christ has
undertaken to save men by giving them a superior and secret knowledge (gnosis).
The words attributed to Jesus apparently have only one single obvious
meaning. In reality, they have another hidden meaning. Only those who
have been initiated, the "spirituals", are able to interpret
them by bringing in from elsewhere other logia such as in the
"Gospel of Thomas". The essential point lies in the
recognition of the inescapable struggle between evil and good, between
matter and spirit. It is necessary to bring as many men as possible to
the state of spirits divested of all contact with the flesh.

This philosophical-religious interpretation of Christianity had
reached Vienne and Lyon, the first dioceses of Gaul, Greek in origin,
where Irenaeus went and where he was ordained a priest. At the time when
the persecution of 177 was preparing to break out, Irenaeus was sent on
a mission to Pope Eleutherius (175-189) at Rome. It was there that he
learned of the persecution at Vienne and Lyon, the memory of which—like
that of so many other events concerning Saint Irenaeus—is preserved in
the Ecclesiastical History (book V) of Eusebius of Caesarea
(260-340).

It was necessary to rebuild the Church of God which was at Lyon.
Irenaeus returned to Gaul where he succeeded Pothinus and thus became
the second bishop of Lyon-Vienne. Not only did he assure the presence of
Christ the preacher and shepherd at the crossroads of the Three Gauls,
but at the same time he carried out the composition of his masterpiece
which is cited today under the title of Adversus Haereses (Against
the Heresies). The actual title expresses more clearly the double
movement of Irenaeus' theology and polemic. It is called Detection
and Refutation of the False Gnosis.Local traditions mention
the influence of Saint Irenaeus in the young Churches of Valence,
Besancon, Autun, Dijon and Langres. Theodoret calls Irenaeus "the
apostolic man who enlightened the West", "the one who
enlightened and educated the Celtic nations".

Irenaeus' final appearance on the level of the universal Church took
place during the second phase of the controversy over the date of the
celebration of the Christian feast of Easter. Certain Churches of the
East had come to celebrate the Easter festival on the 13th of the month
of Nisan. Polycarp had brought Pope Anicetus to tolerate this usage
(155). Pope Victor was more rigid and wanted to bring the "Quartodeciman"
Churches to observe the common practice. He excommunicated Polycrates of
Ephesus, the leader of the movement. Irenaeus wrote to Pope Victor to
champion the cause of diversity. As far as be was concerned, the Bishop
of Lyon agreed with the Roman tradition, but he thought that a diversity
of tradition did not endanger faith which, of itself, demanded unity.

How did the Bishop of Lyon's earthly life end? It is generally held
that Irenaeus was martyred in 202 during the persecution of Septimius
Severus which was particularly severe in the area of Gaul around Lyon.

2. The great Tradition

We come now to Saint Irenaeus' study and example of which the Holy
Father spoke at Lyon. This method contains essentially two points
(Pontifical Address, n. 3): respect for Apostolic Tradition and a
knowledge of the doctrines of each age. In this, John Paul II has shown
himself once again as the Pope of the Second Vatican Council. Indeed,
the Council cites texts of Saint Irenaeus fourteen times. With the
exception of Saint Augustine, this is the greatest frequency with which
a Father of the Church is cited.

That which the Pope and the Second Vatican Council have asked first
of all of Saint Irenaeus is a witness to the "great
Tradition", that which embraces both the Scriptures and the
authentic teachings of the Magisterium (Dei Verbum, n, 9).

Many people were speaking of the "two sources of
Revelation" and were not hesitating to tone down the testimony of
Sacred Scripture. Today, the situation is rather the reverse. Some
theologians are not far from the Scriptura sola and make light of
the teachings of the Magisterium, even when they are expressed in the
Ecumenical Councils. Nevertheless, Dei Verbum (n. 10) is as
explicit as can be: "Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture
constitute the sacred deposit of the Word of God entrusted to the
Church".

Saint Irenaeus was without doubt the first theologian to construct a
system where the harmonization of the inspired written texts and the
tradition of the Magisterium was explicitly and continually affirmed.
For the Bishop of Lyon, it is the preaching of Christ which holds first
place. He spoke openly without recourse to the secrets of gnosis. Christ
taught all the mysteries of the Kingdom of God openly. The Apostles, the
disciples and multitudes of listeners heard Christ and repeated his
words and gestures. "To the Apostles and the disciples, Jesus has
explicitly given the power to bring men to rebirth in God; he said to
them, 'Go, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit' (Mt 28:18-19)" (AH III, 17,
1). A Church such as that of Rome was founded first of all by the
preaching of the disciples, but more especially by that of Peter and
Paul, who were for it the authentic witnesses of Tradition. Peter
preached his gospel there; it is only after his death that Mark wrote it
down. The same holds true for Paul, whose gospel teaching was taken down
by Luke (AH, III, 1, 1). The witnesses of the second generation, viri
apostolici,continued this transmission of the oral tradition
in the office of episcopoi and presbyteroi (inthe
primary sense of the terms). The Tradition which comes from the Apostles
is thus preserved in the Church through the "continuous line of
bishops, their successors, to whom they passed on their own mission of
teaching" (AH III, 3, 1; cf. Dei Verbum,n. 7). By
his grace God accepts them and preserves them "perfect" and
"without reproach in every instance" (AH III, 3,1).

Thus it is that the Church is one by the faith proclaimed by the
bishops, the successors of the Apostles (AH IV, 10, 1) as well as by the
Eucharist which they celebrate in memory of the one Lord (AH IV, 17, 5).
This unity could be demonstrated by taking up the succession of the
legitimate bishops in each of the local Churches. Irenaeus outlines this
demonstration for Smyrna, his native city. As we have said, he knew
Polycarp (AH III, 3, 4). Polycarp "had been instructed by the
Apostles—especially John and had lived with many of those who had seen
Our Lord"; "it was furthermore by the Apostles that, in the
Church of Smyrna and in Asia, Polycarp had been made bishop". It is
not necessary, however, to trace the universal apostolic succession to
come to a realization of the primacy of the Church's unity in one
authentic faith. There is a shorter and surer way to reach the
"great tradition" of the Apostles and bishops: It is that of
the Church of Rome,

3. The Church of Rome, a privileged witness to Tradition

Indeed, for Saint Irenaeus, there is a centre and a guardian of
ecclesial unity. It is the Church of Rome, "very great, very
ancient, known to all... founded and established by the two most
glorious Apostles Peter and Paul" (AH III, 3, 2). They had already
had twelve successors, and it was during the reign of Pope Eleutherius
(175-189) that Irenaeus wrote the third book of his Adversus Haereses
(III, 3, 3). Among the successors of Peter, the third, Clement,
intervened at Corinth to remind that Church of the authentic apostolic
tradition: "For with this Church (of Rome) on account of the more
powerful authority of its foundation (or: "on account of its more
excellent origin, propter potentiorem principalitatem"),every
Church must be in accord, that is, the faithful everywhere, in which
Church (of Rome) the Tradition which comes from the Apostles is always
preserved more than by the faithful everywhere" (AH III, 3, 2). A
few pages further, in an attempt at what we today would call biblical
theology, the special authority of Peter is again emphasized by Irenaeus.
He highlights in particular the testimony of Peter regarding the
divinity of Jesus the Saviour and his attitude of authority in the young
community at Jerusalem (AH, III, 12, 1-7). Irenaeus does not ignore the
"incident at Antioch" (Gal 2:11 ff.) but keeps it in its
proper perspective of a pastoral adaptation to the situation (AH III,
12, 15). He forcefully emphasizes Paul's submission to Peter and to the
other members of the apostolic college (AH III, 13, 3) as well as the
complementary role of Paul with regard to Peter. The witness given by
all the Apostles to Christ the Son of God and only Saviour is unanimous
and fundamental. Peter, however, has a special place there in the same
way that his successors will have in the episcopal college which is the
successor to the apostolic college. There is a remarkable continuity, it
must be noted, between the teaching of Irenaeus and that of the Second
Vatican Council on this subject (cf. Lumen Gentium, n. 22; Nota
Praevia).

If the communion of faith to be believed and lived must be perfect
between the Bishop of Rome and the other bishops, it is not necessarily
the same for all the other aspects of the Church's life. The authority
of the See of Peter, John Paul II rightly noted in his address, does not
imply a uniformity of all liturgical, canonical and cultural customs.
"This sense of the unity of faith and of the Church does not
prevent Irenaeus from making a distinction between what must be
unanimous, bound to the identity of the apostolic faith, and that which
arises from a legitimate diversity on account of customs, cultures and
sensibilities". The most typical example of this pluralism of
coherence is indeed the Bishop of Lyon's breadth of view and his
intervention in the second phase of the controversy concerning the
celebration of Easter, about which we spoke above. Who knows if in that
Irenaeus was not recalling the indulgence which his teacher Polycarp had
already shown in 155? What is essentially important is the principle
which the Holy Father has taken from Irenaeus: "The difference in
practice with regard to the fast established the unanimity of
faith" (Address, n. 3). In this diversity of customs which, in his
own opinion, went against an apostolic liturgical tradition, Irenaeus
desired above all to see a secondary question which, in spite of the
error of fact, attempted to retain the best possible of that which had
bound together the Apostles in the question of the doctrine of
salvation. Faith and the respect for the "Great Tradition"
were the same in the two disciplines. On both sides, Christians were
protesting against Gnostic Christology in affirming that the Word had
truly become flesh, that he had died and arisen in his bodily state.
What was essential was to celebrate Christ as the Son of God, the
Saviour, true man and true God.

4. Fidelity to "Tradition"

In speaking as he did of Saint Irenaeus, the Pope did not only wish
to celebrate a great personage of the Church if Lyon or merely to thank
the scholars of Lyon who have made the author of Adversus Haereses famous*and have drawn inspiration from him for theirown
work, John Paul II also wanted to trace some lessons which concern all
contemporary theologians.

The first of these instructions, it seems to me, concerns above all
positive theology and the relations between exegesis and theology. It is
not a question of history alone, but of the penetration of the profound
inspiration of the Sacred Scriptures in the manner of Saint Irenaeus:
"The exegete and the theologian must bring into play the clear
relationship which extends from the Old to the New Testament. This
relationship constitutes a deposit of the Christian faith"
(Address, n. 4). The Pope ascertained with joy that "this theme is
currently the object of a renewed consiousness" (ibid.). He desired
new efforts in order better to grasp the continuity of the People of
God, to understand the Gospels and Saint Paul, to contribute to a
rapprochement between Christians and Jews. Another type of clear
relationship desired by John Paul II is that which regards exegesis and
Scripture: "Today as yesterday, exegesis must lead to theology and
theology must take its point of departure from a continual and updated
return to the Scriptures read in the Church" (Address, n. 4). In
reading Adversus Haereses,a theologian of the 1950s was
not too certain whether he was dealing with a study in theology or a
work of exegesis. This is because the theology of the l6th and 17th
centuries had separated exegesis and theology. This problem did not
arise at the time of the Fathers nor in the glorious 13th century.

Saint Thomas and Saint Bonaventure, the two great theologians of that
century, drew from the same doctrine for their scriptural commentaries
(the object of their courses) and the syntheses, the Summae,which
they composed on other occasions.

This exegetical-theological synthesis found one of its most beautiful
realizations in Saint Irenaeus as well as in many other Fathers of the
Church. The Scholastics carried it on in their own way. On the other
hand, it has been progressively abandoned since the 16th century and the
intrusion of certain modern philosophies into theology. These doctrines,
and most especially the "rationalist spirit", wished to go
beyond the "threshold of transcendence". Like the Gnostic
systems, they "pretended to answer the question of the how of the
divine actions" (Address, n. 5). Irenaeus, according to the Pope,
understood that it was necessary to stop at the "why" and
apply it to the History of Salvation (ibid.). For Catholic theologians,
it is not a question of building monuments of speculative thought, of
constructing an inviolable metaphysics. The point of departure of
authentic theology is the History of Salvation (creation, sin,
incarnation, redemption, divinization) such as it is presented by the
Apostolic Tradition, which is expressed in the authentic Magisterium
progressively unveiling the sacred writings in communion with all the
faithful who follow Christ. The point of arrival is the meaning of the
divine plan of the Covenant. This synthesis gathers together all the
given elements scattered through the sacred books and the acts of the
Magisterium in order to "emphasize God's liberty, the liberty of
his superabundant love". What Irenaeus did in "a new and sound
synthesis", ought to be continued by exegetes and theologians today
thanks to a better knowledge of the texts and documents of Tradition and
keeping in mind the needs of their contemporaries.

As we invoke this communion of thought which goes from the Eternal
Christ to the unfolding of the history of ideas and philosophies, we
arrive at the second major trait of Irenaeus' theology which the Pope
desired to emphasize in his address to the Academic Community of the
Catholic University of Lyon.

5. Creative inventiveness in theology: the knowledge of contemporary
ideologies

After he had reminded the professors and scholars of the demand for
"a profound, demanding and delicate sense for the living tradition
of the faith", the Holy Father remarked that Saint Irenaeus was
nevertheless a man of his times and that he felt the necessity to give
an inventive character to his teaching (Address, n. 4). It must be the
same for the theologian today "who furthermore must not forget the
world in which we live, its legitimate requests, the currents of thought
abroad in it which often bear truths that must be recognized, but also
intellectual temptations and even blindness. He must be aware of the
obstacles or the prejudices which certain ideologies impose on the act
of believing" (Address, n. 4). Indeed, Saint Irenaeus renders the
discourse of faith "pertinent with regard to the now requests
placed by culture" (Address, n. 4).

It goes without saying that such an attitude of inventiveness and
dialogue has a preliminary condition: The Christian theologian must not
only know the Christian and Apostolic Tradition, he must realize
"that one cannot respond to a religious ideology without knowing it
well. That is why, before refuting such an ideology, he must gather
information and understand it" (Address, n. 4).

Saint Irenaeus was convinced, in fact, that if Gnosticism was able to
spread among the Christians, it was because no one had taken the trouble
to study it seriously. No one was able to offer a pertinent response. He
therefore dedicated the first part of his work to an exposition of the
systems of Ptolemy (AH I, 1-9), of Mark the Magician (AH I, 11-21) and
of Valentinian (AH I, 23-28). In the following books, in which he
engaged in his polemic and re-established the authenticity of the Lord's
teaching, Irenaeus took up the exposition of the non-Christian errors in
detail. The trustworthiness of his information was elsewhere confirmed
by the writings of Clement of Alexandria and of Origen. The breadth and
exactness of his information received even clearer recognition when, in
1943, a Gnostic library in Coptic was discovered buried in the sands at
Nag-Hammadi in Upper Egypt.

It may perhaps be said that this information and this loyalty are
taken for granted in a theologian, above all after Vatican II. Indeed,
the Council insisted on contact with all cultures, all currents of
thought and on dialogue with thinkers of every school and of every
ideology (cf. Gaudium et Spes, nn. 3, 40, 92; AdGentes,nn. 11, 16, 34, 41 etc.). Certainly it is no longer a question of
principle today. However, if the Holy Father recalled this instruction
for openness and inquiry, is it not because some former apologetic or
"ghetto" reflexes run the risk of acting again against certain
things which one would fear to see "trouble the faithful"? The
priests of the generation which made its ecclesiastical studies before
the Second World War cannot but recall certain cases of ostracism with
regard, for example, to the thought of such a spiritualist philosopher
as Bergson; or again the difficulties which, in certain centres of
studies, prevented the students in the years preceding the Council from
becoming acquainted with currents of thought so different as Personalism
and Marxism. Certainly, one does not venture into such ideological
fields without trustworthy guides! But was this not at the time a
necessity for preparing future priests to face contemporary systems, for
helping them to make a distinction between the false and the acceptable?
Was there not a lack of this inventiveness which the Holy Father
extolled at Lyon?

6. Seeking the truth everywhere

How does one approach the reading of contemporary authors? The Holy
Father sanctioned several stages: Seeking the truth wherever it may be
found, rectifying and perfecting it, being on guard for Christian
authenticity.

According to John Paul II, in applying to our age the lessons of the
life and the methods of Saint Irenaeus, "the theologian, faithful
as he may be to Tradition, cannot however forget the world in which we
live, its legitimate demands, the currents of thought abroad in it which
often bear truths that must be recognized" (Address, n. 4). The
Pope does not ignore the necessity of a critical reading demanded by the
authenticity of the faith, but he emphasizes first of all that which
draws together, the authentic institutions to be favoured and the need
to correct.

Here likewise, we find again the spirit of Vatican II, notably of Gaudium
et Spes and of Nostra Aetate.The Church does not
forget that there are in the world before her very many errors and
defects. She refuses, however, to be hypnotized by them. It is necessary
also to consider what the Fathers have called the Semina Verbi,the Preparatio Evangelica, the traces of the grace which is
active in every person (Gaudium et Spes,n. 22).

The Apostles, notably Saint Paul, had an acute awareness of Christian
authenticity. Their vision above all was of Jesus, and of Jesus
crucified (I Cor 1:23). This did not prevent Paul at the Areopagus from
making use of the commonly held Greek religious sentiment. In the Letter
to the Philippians (4:8-9) he does not hesitate to praise the moral
values which the pagans recognized: "Everything which is true,
everything which is noble, just, pure, worthy of love, of respect,
everything which is virtuous and worthy of praise". He sees in
this, however, above all an authentic good of the Christian tradition
preached by the Apostles and blessed by God.

Certainly it is very often necessary to correct the propositions
which one encounters. To the extent possible, this will be done from
within, as the example of Saint Irenaeus suggests. The papal address (n.
5) made a discreet allusion to the anthropological doctrines which the
Gnostics borrowed from the major Greek philosophies. Through them there
was spread the Platonic dualism which made the body the prison of the
soul; a doctrine which is the distant ancestor of all the anti-humanism
of certain schools of thought and spirituality, from Manichaeism to
Jansenism. Saint Irenaeus (AH V, 6, 1), for all that, does not escape
from the body-soul duality; he presents them as complementary elements
of the Christian person, all the better unified to the extent that this
person is governed by grace. "It is the mingling and union of all
these things", he writes, "which constitute the perfect man.
That is why the Apostle, in explaining himself, clearly defined the
perfect and spiritual man, the recipient of salvation when he wrote to
the Thessalonians: 'May the God of peace make you holy in such a way
that you may reach full perfection and that you may be preserved whole
and entire, spirit, soul and body, irreprehensible for the coming of the
Lord Jesus' (I Thess 5:23). They are thus perfect who at the same time
have the Spirit of God always with them and keep themselves without
reproach with regard to their souls and with regard to their bodies;
that is to say, who keep faith with God and practise justice towards
their neighbour".

7. To be on guard for Christian authenticity

The theologian faithful to the Revelation of Christ transmitted by
the Apostolic Tradition will not only have to correct the false
interpretations which the people of his time give regarding the human
vocation and divine love.

It will be necessary for him to find in the inexhaustible riches of
Christ (cf. Eph 3:8) the means with which to promote an authentic
encounter between God and man. The duty of the theologian is to be on
guard for "Christian authenticity" as was Saint Irenaeus
(Address. n. 5).

Indeed, "The Gnosis which Irenaeus had to combat appears to us
today as a series of works which has already been overcome", the
Holy Father noted. But it remains a type of thought and deformation
which is almost eternal. It can even be said that these processes of
thought are found in a striking manner in certain intellectual
tendencies of our time It was a "para-Christianity whose danger
Irenaeus saw". Then, as in our own day, it was a question of
"using Revelation" and of "interpreting it from a very
particular point of view". In extreme cases, some people have
recourse to the "familiar formulae of the Christian Creed in order
to justify a doctrine contrary to the faith. In this sense, the Gnostic
temptation is always an obstacle for the Church" (Address, n. 5).

The Pope immediately demonstrated what he had said by making use of
two recent examples. True, he did it with his usual tact, but that did
not impede either the firmness of his intention or the clarity of his
exposition. The first example was taken from the "idealist
Christology", which has recently been the object of some remarkable
critical studies.

John Paul II stated (Address, n, 5): "The attempt at an
interpretation of Christianity by philosophers such as Hegel was indeed
a manner of emptying the Christian faith of its substance by
interpreting the humiliation of the Son of God as the loss of identity
of God and the abolition of the abyss between God and his
creature".

The example which the Holy Father also drew from certain contemporary
exegetical tendencies was obviously nor aimed at the great majority of
Catholic scholars, This tendency is relatively limited. It nevertheless
illustrates the danger which is always present of a certain Gnostic
tendency which the Pope presented in this manner: "Today, too,
there exists, in a manner widespread among certain Christians, the
temptation to give an interpretation of the Bible determined by
presuppositions foreign to the faith, which attempts to bend the faith
to a system constructed outside it, all the while preserving the
familiar formulae of the Bible or of Christian doctrine in support of
those heterogenous ideologies" (Address, n. 5). How can one not
think of certain politicized interpretations of the "Magnificat",
of the preferential choice in favour of the poor, the spirit of service
is opposed to the libido dominandi,which have flourished
in certain presentations of the "theologies of liberation"? In
the background, can not an attentive reader find Marxism taken not only
as a means of sociological analysis but as an ideology to be realized
for rendering present and active the Kingdom of God? The two
"Instructions" of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith have fortunately opened many eyes. Once again, after the, example
of Saint Irenaeus, sound theology has joined fidelity to Tradition to a
sense of inventiveness.

In the name of the faith and of the message of the love of Tradition,
in communion with the present difficulties of many thinkers and pastors
in the face of a social injustice which is ever greater and better
known, contemporary theologians understand better the human and
Christian doctrine on the right use of material goods, on the duty of
austerity for some and of non-violent struggle for others, Taken
according to an authentic inspiration, "liberation theology"
is united with the concern of Vatican II, of the Pope and of many other
witnesses to Tradition for the necessity to understand
"humanization", development and human progress as elements of
the redemptive work of Christ in the recapitulation of all things by
Christ... Another lesson which Saint Irenaeus gives us.

8. The 'value' of man, the work of God

Once again, there is found in Saint Irenaeus the concern to bring to
the fore and to bring together the greatness and the love of God and the
dignity and potentiality of man. Moreover, here is perhaps the profound
reason for the attention which has been given him for the past fifty
years in theology as well as in spirituality. It is thus useless to
oppose the Fathers of the Church to other Doctors. We have seen through
the centuries the dangers which arise from the interminable battles
between different theological schools. It cannot be denied, however,
that the Church in our day has felt the need to react against the false
interpretations of certain post-Augustinian elements which had developed
through the course of history. The contempt for man, his incapacity to
live an authentic dignity, the total weakness attributed to man, the
obsession with sin and concupiscence were still deep-rooted tendencies
at the beginning of this century against which many wished to react
without knowing too well how to do so. How was it possible to attribute
an authentic value to man, a just autonomy in the responsibilities which
are his own without breaking the relation of the creature vis-à-vis
God, without granting him a complete autonomy? Complete autonomy was the
temptation of atheistic Marxism. Respect for God too often appeared as
contempt for human existence, which was sacrificed to the purely
eschatological aspect of the Kingdom of God.

In one sense, it can be said that the profound significance of the
great conciliar documents such as Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et
Spes isthe will to overcome this false dilemma and to
eliminate the last effects of Jansenism. It is not due to chance if each
of these two conciliar Constitutions harks back to the doctrine of the
recapitulation of human history in Christ. Certainly—and we shall say
so—Saint Irenaeus is there, too, the witness of the Roman tradition of
Saint Paul, and he is not the only one. This does not take away from the
fact that historically he has given to this theological doctrine an
importance and a sense which are his own. It is to Book III of the Adversus
Haereses (16, 6; 22,1-3) that Lumen Gentium (n. 13)
refersin order to say: "This character of universality
which adorns the People of God is a gift from the Lord himself whereby
the Catholic Church ceaselessly and efficaciously seeks for the return
of all humanity and all its goods under Christ the Head in the unity of
his Spirit". As for the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (n.
57, 4), it refers to Adversus Haereses (111, 11, 8)in
order to justify the promotion of culture in the general sense of the
search for human values when it states: "As a consequence (of
culture) the human spirit, freed from the bondage of material things,
can be more easily drawn to the worship and contemplation of the
Creator. Moreover, man is disposed to acknowledge, under the impulse of
grace, the Word of God,who was in the world as 'the true light
that enlightens every man' (Jn 1:9), before becoming flesh to save and
recapitulate all things in himself".

9. Recapitulation in Christ according to St Paul and St Irenaeus

Before the Council, Pius X's pontifical motto, Instaurare omnia in
Christo,was often cited according to the translation which
the Tridentine Vulgate gave of this passage of the hymn which opens the
Letter to the Philippians (1:10). The Neo-Vulgate has returned to a
greater fidelity to the original text: recapitulare omnia in Christo.
Many ideas and images come together under this presentation of
Christ as the Head of humanity. For the sake of brevity, let us say that
it is above all a question of two essential themes. For different
reasons and, moreover, to different degrees, Christ is the Head of all
men and of Christians in particular. He imparts to them the values of
creation and of divine adoption. He is the Head who guides and directs,
who causes humanity to live and develop. Under a second aspect, the
image is concerned more with the idea of gathering, of joining together,
of enrichment in universal fraternity.

In section 6 of his address at Lyon, the Holy Father presented a
synthesis of this theology of recapitulation according to Saint Irenaeus.
There is nothing to be added. I shall therefore content myself here with
placing again before the eyes of the reader one of the expositions by
which Saint Irenaeus demonstrates in the work of Christ, the Head of
humanity, the redemption and the surpassing of all values and all hopes,
the pardon of all failures and of all sins.

"The Word of God, the Only Son, has always been present to
humanity. According to the Father's pleasure, he has united and mingled
himself with the work which he had formed. He became flesh. This Word
made flesh is Jesus Christ, Our Lord. It is he who suffered for us, who
has been raised for us, who will return in the Father's glory in order
to raise all flesh, to reveal salvation and to apply the rule of just
judgment to all who will be subject to his power. There is, thus, only
one God, the Father, as we have demonstrated; and one Christ Jesus, Our
Lord, who has passed through all 'economies' and has recapitulated
everything in himself (Eph 1:10). In this 'everything' man is also
included, this work formed by God. He thus also recapitulated man in
himself; invisible he became visible, indiscernible he became
discernible, impassible he became passible, the Word made man. He
recapitulated everything in himself in order that, just as the Word of
God has the primacy over the supercelestial, spiritual and invisible
beings, he might also have it over visible and corporeal beings,
assuming this primacy in himself and setting himself up as Head of the
Church (Eph 1:22) in order to draw all to himself at the proper
time" (AH III,16, 6).

What paths for research are not to be found here for theologians
rightly concerned to mark out better the harmony between the creation
and the divinization of man, between the spiritual life and implantation
in the cosmos and in time, between the Incarnation and the Redemption!
We are far from the disharmony and the lack of consistency of numerous
theological manuals of a former time.

10. Conclusion: man fully alive and turned towards God

It is not only in the doctrine of recapitulation by the grace of
Christ that Saint Irenaeus wanted to situate the true value of man,
which was denied by the Gnostics. He was careful to note the intrinsic
dignity of man, let us even say the relative autonomy of the creature
capable of freely orienting himself. Certain contemporaries of ours
thirty years ago were gladly spreading about the ambiguous formula:
"The glory of God is man fully alive".

In fact, this formula was truncated and ended up making the Bishop of
Lyon say the contrary of that which he had taught. Man's life is for him
the glory of God provided that man remains in contact with his Creator.
Shortly after the Council, some theologians and some historians such as
Père do Lubac had already protested against this false interpretation.
The Holy Father did just as much with the tact which distinguishes him.
In his address at Lyon (n. 2), he recalled the authentic and complete
text of Saint Irenaeus: "The glory of God is man fully alive, and
the life of man is the vision of God. If the revelation of God through
creation already brings life to all living beings on the earth, how much
more will the manifestation of the Father by the Word bring life to
those who see God" (AH IV, 20, 7).

Thus the life of the Christian, in faith as in future vision, is
essentially knowing and being known. This is one of the fundamental
texts of Christian personalism. The disciple of Jesus is not an isolated
being. In order to exist, in order to act, he must know the Christ and
his Father and be known by them. Nothing is taken away from human
values; they are merely taken up and transfigured. In this, Irenaeus, as
the Holy Father said (Address, n. 2), "has been at the same time
the theologian of God and of man".

In order to grasp the profound sense of this personalism, it is
perhaps necessary to note here the resonance of certain Johannine texts
into which Irenaeus had been initiated in a special way by Polcarp who,
as we have said, had known the Apostle himself. One would be tempted to
say that there is a more profound sense of knowledge, gnosis in the
primary sense of the word, in Johannine theology. May I, in conclusion,
cite three texts of the Beloved Disciple which give us the full meaning
of this Johannine knowledge? In Jesus' farewell prayer are found these
words addressed to the Father: "Give eternal life to all those whom
you have given to me. Eternal life is this, that they may know you the
only true God" (Jn 17:3): "I have made your name known to them
and will make it known again, so that the love with which you have loved
me may be in them and that I may be in them". This love is a truly
dynamic one as the First Letter of Saint John says (1 Jn 2:3): "by
this we know that we have knowledge of him, if we keep his
commandments".

To the false Gnosis there is opposed the authentic knowledge of God
and of man in the reciprocity of love. It is this which is the profound
meaning of Saint Irenaeus' message.

____________________________

* It is to be noted that the prestigious
collection of patristic texts Sources Chrétiennes began at Lyon.
The ten volumes of the collection dedicated to Saint Irenaeus were
presented to the Holy Father on the occasion of his visit to the
Facultés Catholiques at Lyon. Return

Taken from:
L'Osservatore Romano
Weekly Edition in English
9 February 1987, page 6

L'Osservatore Romano is the newspaper of the Holy See.
The Weekly Edition in English is published for the US by: