On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 07:41:21PM +0000, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:17:48 -0200, José Romildo Malaquias <romildo@urano.iceb.ufop.br> pisze:
>> > But this is not relevant to my question. Removing the instance
> > declaration
> >
> > instance C Integer where
> > ty _ = "Integer"
> >
> > from the program (so that there is no instance overlapping now)
> > does not help.
>> In this case your instance would be the only one possible (any other
> would overlap) and it could be equally well written as a plain function.
Any instance for a no-Num type will not overlap:
instance (Num a) => C a where
ty _ = "NUM"
instance C Char where
ty _ = "CHAR"
and the overloaded function cannot be written as
a plain function.
> Actually Haskell 98 has more severe restriction than non-overlapping
> instances. The instance head must be a type constructor applied to
> as many distinct type variables as needed to let the kinds match.
> "instance Foo [Int]" is as non-standard as "instance Foo a".
I am not understand the restriction well. I verified that
both Hugs and GHC, when using extensions, accepts
"instance C [Int]", but only Hugs accepts
"instance (Num a) => C a".
Where is this issue presented in a simple way easily
understandable by regular Haskell programmers? Any pointers?
Romildo
--
Prof. José Romildo Malaquias <romildo@iceb.ufop.br>
Departamento de Computação
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Brasil