Comments about ‘Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say’

We who question are routinely told that extraordinary claims require
extraordinary evidence all the while being told not to question the
extraordinary events of 9/11the unprecedented explosive disintegration of three
steel framed high rise buildings even though there is lacking in the official
explanations any credible evidence for this being a chance result of two plane
imapcts, let alone *extraordinary* evidence of this. Indeed, the NIST admits
that it did not conduct a single test on the debris from the world trade center
for traces of explosives or incendiaries like thermite even though these are
prescribed in fire investigation manuals as essential to rule out arson. Why on
earth not?

The Deseret News - a once respectable
institution - publishes the ravings of this crackpot without even BOTHERING to
get an opposing view? No attempt to point out how absolutely insane all of this
nonsense is?

I'm canceling my subscription tomorrow. I had
subscribed to the paper version more to support the Deseret News than to read it
- I still read it mostly online. But I absolutely cannot support an institution
that puts out such bilge any longer.

Remember the animated
video the media showed over and over again to all the sheeple to explain the
fire streaking upward seen by huundreds of eyewitnesses [including other
pilots] was the doomed plane lurching upward as a result of lost weight in
the front?

The laws of THIS universe don't work like that.
Longitutinal Stablity. The wings would have folded instantly with that nose off,
weight gone, and hundreds of thousands of tons of instant asymmetrical
aerodynamic drag.

BTW, most people have long since forgetten that the
"Video" was produced by the CIA., and NOT the NTSB nor the FBI. Go back and look
at the credits. The CIA - our governement's Masters of cloak & dagger.

And at the time of 9/11 George Stephanopoulos commented on ABC during the live
broadcast "..and my time at the White House was used in the aftermath of the
Oklahoma City bombing. In the aftermath of the TWA Flight 800 bombing..." -
oops, gaff!!!~

In regard to all of the derogatory comments made here about those who believe
this is a cover up, it really begs the question... "If this is all such obvious
lunacy, why are you spending your time reviewing it?".

To those of
you who are part of the cover up, remember this beautiful and apt quote "There
is no pillow so soft, as a clean conscience". Maybe you should try it some
time.

heh... I see the nutjob deniers are really busy on this site. They DENY that
its an inside job. When evidence suggests other... They DENY prior explosions
when evidence suggests other... One person above called them shills... a more
apt term might be 'shrills', as they yell and scream 'Don't look folks!!" Prof.
Jones, in my opinion does follow any one line of reasoning as to 'who did it'.
He distanced himself from that several years ago when it became clear that
certain persons were out for personal gain. He now persues a strict point of
'what was there and why' research, and I applaud him for it.

I wonder how many people here attacking the 9/11 Truth Movement actually know
what the official explanation is for the destruction of WTC1,2? If they did know
they would probably stop believing in it, because most people don't want to
admit they believe something so stupid.

None of comments here have
addressed the findings of the paper. All the arguments have merely been moral
outrage and personal incredulity. This appears to be the only "evidence" the
believers in the official conspiracy theory have.

Thanks for the fair handed reporting on the excellent paper by professor Jones,
et al.

Ive noticed that many of the people speaking negatively about
the these scientists, or the journal they chose to publish their work, etc have
not actually addressed any of the points made in the paper.

Thank you for publishing this extremely important work that Dr Jones is doing.
The vitriolic reactions by Truth deniers are understandable. No-one likes being
lied to and worse realising that they have fallen for the lie. They remind me of
the crowd watching the naked Emperor in the fabled tale, who vilify the young
boy who dares to speak the truth. It makes them confront their own
foolishness.The facts are there for all to see if you wish to look.

For those of you who believe the government's account of what transpired on
9/11, ask yourself this revealing question: Where are the media interviews with
Boston Logan, Newark and Dulles airport employees where those employees describe
their impressions of the 19 hijackers?

The answer to that question is
that there were no such media interviews, because the 19 hijackers weren't at
those airports.

Thank you so much Dr. Jones and crew for this breakthrough moment in 9/11
research. The anti-truthers are indeed showing their desperation now.

"Absolutely Shameful": Rather than cancel your subscription tomorrow, I
suggest you renew it. In the past, mainstream media outlets have almost always
ridiculed 9/11 truth, and in doing so has always resorted to insults, ad hominem
arguments and straw man fallacies. In other words, a fair look at both sides is
what all the OTHER papers are guilty of, not Desert News. The simple fact is,
residue of high grade explosive material has been found here, and frankly, there
is no opposing view to that. The "opposing view" you wish the article had
presented would have essentially been the equivalent of "I'm Dr. Smith and I
disagree with Dr. Williams. I boldly assert that 2 + 2 = 5." Because that's
what we're talking about here.

For those new to this topic, I suggest
you google the following [fill in the blank]'s for 9/11 truth:
Architects & Engineers, Pilots, Veterans, Political Leaders, Medical
Professionals. Finally watch the new film "Core of Corruption" (on google) for
the best compilation of evidence yet.

Superb work, Prof. Jones! The conclusion is irrefutable - unreacted
explosivesare found in the dust of the WTC. There is no otherexplanation other than the towers were brought downby explosive
demolition (after all).

The "debunkers" have nothing to offer -
except to deny. Unless they can publish a peer-reviewed account
refuting the nano-thermite, the 9/11 Truthmovement has won the debate.

Press for a new investigation, insist on subpoenapowers, find the
suspects, have them questioned assemble a grand jury, and begin prosecuting.

I believe that they should look into the design of those three buildings to find
out what made two of them explode and disintegrate and the three of them fall
straight down. If Doctor Jones is wrong then a lot of lives and mess could be
saved during earthquakes.

Wow | 5:49 p.m. April 7, 2009 This is Responsible reporting. Not printing
this article puts us at greater risk for continuation of dishonestly started
wars in the Middle East.

It appears that approximately a million
people have been killed by us in Iraq alone. It should be known if this is being
done for a "justifiable" reason or not. Further, for the sake of national
security, we need to know if our government has been honest about 911 and the
recent wars in the Middle East.

Do you really want a (U.S.)
government that might be willing to enable a "911" in our own country?"

No, I do not want a government capable of committing a "9-11" in our country,
but then again, WHO SAYS WE'VE GOT ONE?????????????