Remember how Goldman Sachs promised to sift through all its email for the word "muppet," after Greg Smith's allegation that workers referred to clients with that put-down in his notorious New York Times op-ed? Nearly three weeks later, Gasparino followed up, finding that all but 2 percent of the mentions of "muppets" referred to the movie, and the rest were employees making fun of each other. So, if you're a Goldman Sachs client, it's a good bet no one called you "muppet" behind your back.

Dealbreaker had a good laugh at Gasparino's crusade for the truth about muppet usage, which in fairness was pretty funny as he "breathlessly" tweeted his progress: "While a lesser journalist would have been content to take the source at his or her word, Charles Gasparino is no such journalist. He get kept digging on this one and now, amazingly, has more to add," Dealbreaker's Bess Levin wrote Wednesday. She's clearly being sarcastic, but the first few seconds of Gasparino's report did update viewers on a story they might've forgotten.

Disappointingly, instead of revealing what Goldman Sachs employees said about the Muppet movie or giving hilarious examples of them ripping on each other, Gasparino spent the rest of the segment rehashing Smith's book deal and how he would spend his $1.5 million fee in a Bankok sex club. Sigh. Bring on the Gasparino mocking, after all.

Everyone has someone on their holiday shopping list who’s impossible to buy for. For the second year in a row, we asked Atlantic readers to describe their someone, and brainstormed a few perfect gift ideas for them.