Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Was there sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict of guilty of the charge of Endangering by Fire or Explosion?
Did the trial court err in permitting the State to file Notice of Habitual Offender status at a late date in the proceedings?
Was the jury's verdict inconsistent and should not stand?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether sufficient evidence existed to find the defendant guilty of endangerment by fire?
Whether the procedures used by the trial court to find the defendant is a habitual criminal offender complied with the law?
The trial court did not err in having the jury decide the defendant was a habitual offender.
The verdict form used by the trial court appropriately gave instructions to the jury as to what they must find.