Sunday, June 5, 2016

The irrelevancy of the United Nations -As US-facilitated lawlessness abound, can the United Nations play any meaningful role in promoting a semblance of international law?

As US-facilitated lawlessness
abound, can the United Nations play any meaningful role in promoting a
semblance of international law?

Sooner or later, the people of
Greater Eurasia, particularly within the core nations of Russia, China and
India may demand a governmental reappraisal of their UN memberships. What does
the UN do? Prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, which, failed in the
case of Pakistan, North Korea and possibly Saudi Arabia? Prevent the emergence
of Western-backed transnational jihad from the Mujahedeen-era to present-day
Syria and Iraq? Prevent Western-backed regime changes and colour revolutions?

Even neutral UN drafts are
conveniently reinterpreted by the US to satiate its geopolitical bloodlust.

Between 2012 and 2015, the UN
Security Council (UNSC) passed eight resolutions concerning Syria. Although the
wording of each was neutral, the US and its allies mendaciously depicted them
as a “unanimous” international condemnation of Damascus. Resolution 2209 (2015)
was particularly noteworthy: While the envoys of Russia and China condemned the
use of chemical weapons in Syria, both avoided blaming any party before formal
investigations were complete. The US ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power,
however had no hesitation in blaming Bashar al-Assad’s culpability in the
official draft. Later, an 85-page
UN report issued on Dec 13, 2013 acknowledged that chemical weapons were
indeed used – against Syrian “soldiers and civilians!”

In the meantime, up to 500,000
Syrians have been killed, many of them via beheadings, crucifixions and
immolations. More creative execution methods include RPG firing squads and freezing
deserters to death. How can the Islamic State afford such sadistic
extravagance?

The Syrian human toll does not
include the rapes, enslavement and forced conversions perpetrated on the Yazidi
and Christian minorities. While this article is being read by someone,
somewhere, some minority Syrian girl is being caged, raped in captivity or sold
off by terrorists propped by Greater Eurabia.

A US-led UN resolution is therefore
tantamount to a national Siren Song. Blood inevitably flows, lives will be
snuffed out and targeted nations will be ruined. (Luckier nations like Cuba and
Iran only get sanctioned). It doesn’t matter that the stats are pretty
incriminating. If the US had militarily intervened in 30 nations in the past 30
years, all 30 of them would be showpiece basket cases. One study
claims that the US had “killed More Than 20 Million People in 37 ‘Victim
Nations’ Since World War II” while yet another shows that the US has been at
war 93% of the time – 222
out of 239 years – since 1776!

In the final analysis, one should
ask: As a pan-Eurasian institutional and arbitration complex takes shape, is
the post-WWII UN model relevant anymore? Extract from Eurasia View