If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

When I learned to shoot a handgun, it was with a double action revolver. I found that I learned more, and improved in my abilities more via dry firing than any live firing. Sight alignment and trigger control are essential and they are hard to master with the noise and recoil of the weapon distracting you. One knows exactly where the sights were when the hammer falls without the blast and recoil of live ammo. I am an old PPC shooter and know of no successful shooters who did not spend hours dry firing. To this day, if I am shooting poorly, a session dry firing helps.

Not withstanding any of the above, any trigger time is better than none. Practice with inexpensive ammunition that is light in recoil is better than none, and probably better than overpractice with heavy recoiling ammo where one develops soreness, tendonitis or a flinch. Practice doesn't make perfect....perfect practice does.

I fired over 10k rounds of .22 before getting a CF pistol. Time well spent. If you cannot group with a .22, you will do a lot worse with a CF.

My opinion is far too many people use full power loads too soon in their training. I load mousephart loads for my fiancé so she can work her way up. Another good reason for a revolver.

I agree. The question I was exploring in the video, however, is whether using a 22 pistol will help maintain/enhance defensive shooting skills for an experienced shooter. I completely agree that a rimfire is the best option for training a new shooter.

A hand gun in 22 lr. as close to your chosen firearm as you can get will most certainly improve your skill. Dry firing in your guns where appropriate is an even bigger plus.

As a matter of necessity I do revolvers .... besides two legged coyotes I also am concerned with apex predators. As a result I chose to use 44 Mag and later added a SRH in 480 Ruger. I also have 38/357 and 41 Mag revolvers but count the largest calibers as the “business” cartridges.

For all my revolver work I rely on a K22 Smith & Wesson and run through my paces, switch up to centerfire and run up the power ladder with them. I never shoot the heavy stuff long enough to feel like I am beating myself up.

I stopped shooting paper targets long ago. Instead I seek out reactionary targets. My favorite is the lowly golf ball, cheap .... mostly free, long lived with the larger calibers and plentiful.

Let me debunk a favorite wive’s tale: If you train in DA .... you can defend in DA with the large calibers and stiff loads.

as for recoil management in fast action probably not that much, while you still can practice the fundamentals ,the basics regarding grip,stance,steady aiming, trigger control .....all those things you also want to master with the bigger bores as well .

now,the .22 can't mimick the recoil of the larger calibers, consecutive shots with a .22 can't reproduce the energy felt through centerfire handguns , then in that regard the practice time invested into the real thing can't be substitued by the rimfire ; shooting fast and accurately is one thing with a ruger MK 22-45 ; it requires much more efforts as recoil and muzzle flip increases .simple math.

That's more or less what I was saying in the conclusion to my video. There is definitely marksmanship value in practicing with the .22, but it can't replace practicing with your actual defensive pistol/ammunition.

Rimfire won't replicate the recoil or muzzle blast of the centerfire counterpart. It will aid and assist in gear (gun/holster) manipulation and clothing wear and selection. Most importantly it will help you to attain and maintain the fundamentals.

If you are a shooter and not a handloader (sounds sickening I know) then a rimfire is a great option due to ammo cost.

Any real trigger time helps. If you have a .22 counterpart to your SD gun, even better. I personally think you will benefit most in the draw and first shot practice, as it's all different noise and recoil wise after that.

I take my heavy recoil in measured doses. Two cylinders full double action out of my Mountain Gun of bear loads and my fundamentals are frazzled if I go beyond that.

I get the bulk of my trigger time from the lowly 22 lr in a k frame and switch up to light 44s in the MG and advance to higher loading. At the end I generally run one cylinder of the “good stuff” and call it good.

Considering the importance of a quick first round centershot, training with a 22 of the same model/characteristics as your defense gun is execelent practice. Agree with others here, still finish up with some quality practice eith full loads. Focus on QUALITY practice. See my siginature...

“You don’t practice until you get it right. You practice until you can’t get it wrong.” Jason Elam, All-Pro kicker, Denver Broncos

While I own my share of autoloaders, my 'go-to' guns are all revolvers and my favorite 'trainer' is a 4" S&W M17-4. Sights, trigger, and balance are the same as my 586 and sufficiently close to my Ruger MC. Don't shoot it as much these days 'cause I can load .38 Spls for less than I can buy .22s locally.