God is Lonely XII: A.C.L.U. is a Vexatious Litigant Against the People?

On November 9, 2016, one day after the election, the A.C.L.U. promptly asserted via its twitter account of its litigation intentions against the people.

This tweet asserted as a fact that President Trump’s promises to the people were unconstitutional. The A.C.L.U. is not a judge or a court of law. Further, after eight long years of former President Obama’s unconstitutional actions, the people, justifiably, voted to reverse those actions in compliance with the people’s Power of Attorney. And as the A.C.L.U. errantly propagates potential legal concerns as unconstitutional, while assuming a role as an organizer against the people, the organization is giving a helping hand to errantly incite disrupting protests.

Certainly, protesting is a constitutional right. However, following the recent legal matters of the A.C.L.U. against President Trump’s executive orders regarding immigrants, which remain pending in court, Black Lives Matter asserted at a protest in Seattle that they need to start “killing people,” and “killing the White House.” Among other things, BLM’s threats were animalistic, nasty, and downright from the devil’s mouth

BLM’s felony threats are not in isolation. It’s part of a manufactured and false belief system across the entire liberal spectrum. And in support of an indoctrination of the people, the A.C.L.U.:

Immediately threatened to sue the people; and

Errantly propagated potential legal concerns as unconstitutional; and

Aided in organizing efforts in support of the errant propagation.

Isn’t it reasonable then to question that these things may lead to an errant belief by other people? This is essentially brainwashing which is abuse. There’s everything wrong, and nothing right in the filth, hatred, and violent words spoken by BLM in Seattle; it is hate, hate, hate, and hate; and it is the epitome of intolerance and nastiness.

Past presidents banned radical immigrants so it’s nothing new. Why is the A.C.L.U. so impassioned now against the people and President Trump? There’s an appearance that it’s personal. The A.C.L.U’s role in aiding the organizing efforts for disrupting protests in airports around the country is an inference in support of it being personal. Is it all from a predisposition resulting in a veiled threat to “see you in court.” If affirmed, the A.C.L.U. is a vexatious litigant against the people and President Trump.

If it’s personal and hate, the image below shows the A.C.L.U. had also paid Twitter to promote it. But did the opposition party moneyman, George Soros, pay for this? The people believe that Soros committed treason, among other things. The people won’t accept blood money from George Soros. This advertisement is not an oath of the people; and the people are in support of President Trump protecting them.