Denial of CENVAT Credit - No manufacturing activity is done - Held that:- Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the benefit to the respondent on the ground that once the duty has been paid on the final product, the same should be treated as reversal of the ineligible credit taken on the inputs and there is no requirement for insisting the assessee again to pay/ reverse the cenvat credit. I find that the observations of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) are in conformity with Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Cr .....

ny Central Excise Duty on removal of final product. However, since the final product has suffered duty, reversal of credit taken by the Respondent on the inputs will not result in any loss of Revenue to the Government exchequer. - no infirmity in the impugned order - Decided against Revenue. - Excise Appeal No. E/2947/2009-Ex(SM) - Dated:- 3-6-2015 - S K Mohanty, Member (J) For the Appellant : Mr G R Singh, DR For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir Malhotra, Adv ORDER Per S K Mohanty The Revenue is in a .....

been paid on the final product, such payment should be treated as reversal of ineligible credit taken on the inputs and the assessee cannot be called upon to pay the credit once again. 2. The Revenue has challenged the impugned order on the ground that the input on which cenvat credit has been taken by the Respondent and the final product manufactured in the factory are the same and not distinct and identifiable commodity. According to the Revenue, since no manufacturing activity have been carri .....

vi vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II reported in 2004 (171) ELT 24 (Tri. Mum) to justify his stand that in absence of any manufacturing activity, the credit taken on the inputs are not permissible and as such the same is required to be reversed. 4. Sh. Sudhir Malhotra, the Ld. Advocate appearing for the Respondent submits that the credit taken on the disputed goods have been utilized for clearance of the finished products from the factory and such utilization of credit is in conformit .....

mp Scheule & Somappa Ltd. vs Commr. of C. Ex. Bangalore reported in 2005 (191) ELT 1085 (Tri. Bang.). 5. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for both the sides and perused the records. 6. In the impugned order, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the benefit to the respondent on the ground that once the duty has been paid on the final product, the same should be treated as reversal of the ineligible credit taken on the inputs and there is no requirement for insisting the assessee again to pa .....