I have been waiting for Michael Schiavo to make the
correction on his PAC/Blog site, but as of this writing, he still hasn't. So
what is up with that? Not his style to admit he made a mistake? Oh well...
heaven forbid anyone might expect him to admit he was wrong and apologize
for allegedly spreading untruths.

Michael hopes his little site will influence voters? And
on this little site -- during an election period -- he appears to have made
false statements about Marilyn Musgrave, a candidate in Colorado? "But just
minutes after taking my seat, I noticed a flurry of activity around my seat
including about four uniformed police officers who were - I would learn
later - called in by Musgrave staffers and asked to remove me from the
building."

He further states, "After the police talked with
obviously irritated Musgrave staffers and the debate organizer, the Musgrave
campaign complained that my seat, next to the timekeeper, was inappropriate
because - get this - Marilyn Musgrave would have to look at me. In an effort
to appease the Musgrave camp, the debate organizers moved the timekeeper to
the other side of the stage - about 15 seats away."

I'm really not sure how Michael could allegedly mistaken
one officer for four, but this I am sure of... if there was a "flurry of
activity" around my seat, I would be hearing something about something that
was going on. I would NOT be sitting there in "Duh-Land", and tuned out as
to what people were saying around me. (It might be me that might want to
move.) I find it difficult to believe that Michael would be either,
especially when this entire situation was obviously a "setup". What else
could one call it?

A seat was saved "intentionally" next to the time keeper?
Saved for Michael by Marilyn Musgrave's opponent's personnel? Yep, I would
call that a setup in the making. Would also call it very hard to not listen
if something was then going on that I thought was related to the setup. I'd
just have to hear what they were all saying, especially if the flurry of
activity was around my seat. Tune up the ears and fine-tune the attention
span! I would definitely be focused, focused, focused!... but he was not? He
just sat there with an oblivious smile on his face?

Another thing I read that Michael supposedly wrote is,
"It's crystal clear that Marilyn Musgrave not only can't admit she's wrong,
she can't even face the consequences of her own actions. She must believe
that if she runs away fast enough or surrounds herself with enough people
who tell her she's great, it never happened."

This kind of sounds to me like Michael is talking about
himself, since he has failed to address the incorrectness of his statements
regarding what took place at the debate. Maybe it should be, "It's crystal
clear that Michael Schiavo not only can't admit he's wrong, he can't even
face the consequences of his own actions. He must believe that if he runs
away fast enough or surrounds himself with enough people who tell him he's
great, it never happened."

But know what? It
did happen! Michael said and what Michael said does not apparently fit with
what was reported by others involved. Curious how familiar that sounds.
Curious, indeed!

Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer
and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture
movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.