The issue I have with this is that the purpose of an 802 WG’s Study Group is to create a PAR (and CSD). This is not a study group for that purpose, but for a bunch of other admirable
purposes.

It is reasonable for a WG’s Study Group to be able to write a PAR and CSD in 6 months, and the IEEE-SA rules mention that figure. I’m not sure it is reasonable for the group this
proposes to be limited the same way. The obvious rejoinder is that I was there and voted to approve the study group, so I should have said my piece then. Nevertheless, I believe we should discuss at the next EC meeting the purpose of this group and determine
whether it fits within the definition of a WG’s study group, or needs to be called (and follow the rules for) something else.