Ground Zero EMT: Told Building 7 Was to Be Pulled

I'm glad to see more people coming forward all the time, but I think the true perpetrators of this crime will have died of old age before the truth
does come out.

Ground Zero EMT: We Were Told Building 7 Was to Be "Pulled"

A New Jersey EMT has gone public on how emergency workers were told that Building 7 was going to be "pulled," before a 20 second demolition
countdown broadcast over radio preceded its collapse. The ground zero rescue worker also blows the whistle on how he witnessed multiple underground
support columns of the WTC towers that had been severed before the buildings imploded. Snip
In his enthralling testimony, the EMT goes into graphic detail of how he and others personally witnessed a plethora of explosions at all points of the
buildings before their collapse.

"There were explosions. There were flashes. There was molten metal running down the I-beams of the basement levels like lava flows. I've never seen
anything like it. Yes, planes hit the buildings - anybody who says otherwise is a moron. But the explosions - the rapid, symmetrical, sequential
explosions - they happened," states 'Mike'.

He explains how he and others were in the basement of one of the towers helping injured victims when he saw "One of the huge steel and concrete
support pillars with an 8 foot section blown out of the center of it." Looking around, Mike saw other support columns that were in the same
condition, prompting rescue personal to ask "how could someone have rigged all these explosives?"

A New Jersey EMT has gone public on how emergency workers were told that Building 7 was going to be "pulled," before a 20 second demolition
countdown broadcast over radio preceded its collapse.

Perhaps of even more interest, the EMT relates the fact that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47
story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be
"pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

Why then aren't others coming forward? Until they do I would have to say that this particular EMT might just eb looking for his 15 minutes of
fame.

Originally posted by mecheng
Why then aren't others coming forward? Until they do I would have to say that this particular EMT might just eb looking for his 15 minutes of
fame.

Yeah, I hate to say this but I'd like this much better if others came forward and confirmed it as well. If the story is true then this will probably
happen over time.

What I wonder is why the countdown to its implosion was broadcast over their radios. Hadn't they already just been told to move away, that it was
"coming down soon"? Sounds like an unnecessary risk to me.

Originally posted by bsbray11
What I wonder is why the countdown to its implosion was broadcast over their radios. Hadn't they already just been told to move away, that it was
"coming down soon"? Sounds like an unnecessary risk to me.

The U.S. govt. cares about them, thats why they decided to broadcast it over their radios.

He explains how he and others were in the basement of one of the towers helping injured victims when he saw "One of the huge steel and
concrete support pillars with an 8 foot section blown out of the center of it." Looking around, Mike saw other support columns that were in the same
condition, prompting rescue personal to ask "how could someone have rigged all these explosives?"

If the basement sub structure of the building was blown, or cut to cause a collapse, why did the building collapse from the top down instead of the
bottom up like all controlled demolitions?? That doesn't make any sense. And no, he wasn't talking about bldg 7 in that quote, it specifically
states he was in one of the towers helping injured.

"There were explosions. There were flashes. There was molten metal running down the I-beams of the basement levels like lava flows. I've never seen
anything like it. Yes, planes hit the buildings - anybody who says otherwise is a moron. But the explosions - the rapid, symmetrical, sequential
explosions - they happened," states 'Mike'.

Like lava flows? WOW. This coincides with MUCH evidence we already have.

yes you are all foaming at the mouth...but you know what the problem is?

[B]nobody can trace who this guy really is.[/B]

He didn't give his real name, so therefore he can't be traced and he story can NEVER be verified.

Considering this info is comming from PRISON PLANET of all places..i don't trust it one bit. PP is a propaganda website, it's NOT real news. If we
had a real name, we could trace him and find when he was working and all that...but this is just like "ok take my word for it i was there"..and
that's not enough from an non credible source, about something that needs serious, truthful, and compelling evidence to be belived by anybody who is
to smart for this 9/11 conspirocy crap.

Originally posted by sensfan
If the basement sub structure of the building was blown, or cut to cause a collapse, why did the building collapse from the top down instead of the
bottom up like all controlled demolitions?? That doesn't make any sense. And no, he wasn't talking about bldg 7 in that quote, it specifically
states he was in one of the towers helping injured.

If the core structure was severed, the inside would fall first and drag everything with it. This would in turn make the outer columns collapse from
their weekest part (the impacted columns). Thus would essencially make it look like the building started to collapse at the impacted floors. We
never got to see what was happening inside the building. We only got to see the outside of the structure fail. Just my opinion on how it could have
been done to look like it failed at the impacted floors.

I think I'll believe this 'source' over you any day of the week. There are countless other bits of self evident proof out there anyways.. like the
moltem metal spewing out of the towers (ON VIDEO) before they collapsed.

I'm watching this story and trying to get more information about this EMT but I'll be paying no more attention to you spawn.. nice try though and
I'm afraid it's you foaming at the mouth..

Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars
I'm watching this story and trying to get more information about this EMT but I'll be paying no more attention to you spawn.. nice try though and
I'm afraid it's you foaming at the mouth..

Perhaps of even more interest, the EMT relates the fact that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building
7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to
be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

The problem with this is that after "hundreds" of others were told that it was about to be pulled, and over five years, he's the only one coming
forward (as far as I know) with this story. I find that hard to believe!

Why then aren't others coming forward? Until they do I would have to say that this particular EMT might just eb looking for his 15 minutes of
fame.

I don't know anything about this guy, but perhaps people don't want to come forward because they're afraid. Just look what happened to two
prominent politicians, Curt Weldon and Cynthia McKinney, who even had the balls to ask tough questions.

Originally posted by Spawwwn
yes you are all foaming at the mouth...but you know what the problem is?

[B]nobody can trace who this guy really is.[/B]

He didn't give his real name, so therefore he can't be traced and he story can NEVER be verified.

Considering this info is comming from PRISON PLANET of all places..i don't trust it one bit. PP is a propaganda website, it's NOT real news. If we
had a real name, we could trace him and find when he was working and all that...but this is just like "ok take my word for it i was there"..and
that's not enough from an non credible source, about something that needs serious, truthful, and compelling evidence to be belived by anybody who is
to smart for this 9/11 conspirocy crap.

this story is trash.

He's keeping himself anonymous to protect his life. You would probably do the same.

Real news is not going to report this story. That's why we have these websites that WILL report them.

Whatever theory you subscribe to about why the WTC buildings came down, there are two glaring problems with this story:

1) Without some way to verify this man's story, it doesn't prove anything. I could claim, with equal credence, to have been at Ground Zero and seen
demons prying the supports loose with their pitchforks.

2) If a 20-second countdown to detonation had been broadcast over radio, as this fellow suggests, I can guarantee you that by now, somebody would've
found a transcript, a tape recording, or police-band scanner output with at least some of that countdown on it.

I couple years back(when I still had cable tv) I watched alot of the WTC specials. There was this lone chemist/bomb expert/? that gathered remains
from the WTC sites and found traces of the explosive resin used in some type of bomb/explosive. He said the traces he found do not come from jet fuel,
anything airplane related or anything that should be around the buildings.

Sorry I don't have any sources to link to. He was on some news station for a few minutes.

Two more ground zero emergency rescue personnel are on the record as stating they were told Building 7 was going to be brought down on 9/11 hours
before its symmetrical implosion, completely contradicting the official explanation of accidental collapse.

Let's hope more people have the courage to come forward! They can't silence them all if there truely were "hundreds" of them.

edit: Here's more...

SINGH: "After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down... I heard that they were going to bring it
down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage... by noon or one o'clock they told us we need to move from that triage site up to Pace
University a little further away because Building 7 was going to come down or be brought down."

HOST: "Did they actually use the word "brought down" and who was it that was telling you this?"

SINGH: "The fire department. And they did use the words 'we're gonna have to bring it down' and for us there observing the nature of the
devastation it made total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent controversy over it I don't know."

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.