"Prosecutions Submissions in Respect of Confidential Material Relating to the
Tadic and Kovacevic
Cases" filed on 26 January 2001 ("Motion for Relief"); and

"Prosecutions Request for Indication of a Trial Date" filed on 23 March
2001 ("Request for a Trial Date");

NOTING the "Response to Prosecutions Request for Indication of a Trial
Date" filed on 2 April 2001 by the accused Brdjanin ("Brdjanin");

CONSIDERING that neither Brdjanin nor the accused
Talic (Talic) have responded to the Motion for Relief and that Talic has
not yet responded to the Request for a Trial Date;

NOTING the "Decision on Prosecution Application" dated 2 April 2001, in
which the Chamber found that the prosecution had complied with its disclosure obligations
with respect to the confidential trial transcript in the Prosecutor
v Tadic of the witness numbered 7.47 in this case;

CONSIDERING that this finding adequately addresses the request made in paragraph
18(1) of the Motion for Relief;

CONSIDERING FURTHER that it is not appropriate for the Chamber to address the
request made in paragraph 18(2) of the Motion for Relief;

CONSIDERING HOWEVER that the following requests made in paragraph 18 of the Motion
for Relief remain to be addressed:

[t]he confidential trial transcripts of Prosecution witnesses in the Tadic case not be disclosed to the Defence and the
Accused in this case, until an appropriate showing has been made that the identity of a
witness is material to the defence.

[t]he Registry be ordered to prepare redacted versions of the confidential trial
transcripts of defence witnesses and confidential exhibits [in the Tadic case], redacting those parts of it which will
reveal the identity of any witness who gave evidence on a confidential basis, and serve
those redacted versions on the Defence. The confidential trial transcripts of defence
witnesses and confidential Defence exhibits in the Tadic
case, not be disclosed to the Defence and the Accused in this case, until an appropriate
showing has been made that the identity of a witness is material to the defence.

confidential Prosecution exhibits in the Tadic
case which would disclose the identity of witnesses who testified on a confidential basis,
not be disclosed to the Defence and the Accused in this case, until an appropriate showing
has been made that the identity of the witness is material to the defence.

PURSUANT TO Rule 54 and Rule 65ter of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence;

HEREBY ORDER that by 17 April 2001 at the latest:

Brdjanin and Talic shall file responses to the Motion for Reli

ef, and in
particular the requests made by the prosecution in paragraphs 18(3)-18(5) thereof; and

Talic shall file a response to the Request for a Trial Date.

Done in both English and French, the English version being authoritative