SSPX Disrupts Kristallnacht Ceremony

A Woman attending the Kristallnacht ceremony tries to remonstrate with the protesting SSPX members

Each year in Buenos Aires, before he assumed the papacy, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio joined his good friend Rabbi Abraham Skorka to lead the annual gathering of Catholics, Jews and Protestants in the Metropolitan Cathedral which commemorates Kristallnacht; the pogrom of Nazi-led mob violence in 1938 when at least 91 Jews were killed and 30,000 were arrested and incarcerated in concentration camps. Jewish homes, hospitals, and schools were ransacked, as the attackers demolished buildings with sledgehammers. Over 1,000 synagogues were burned (95 in Vienna alone) and over 7,000 Jewish businesses destroyed or damaged. It was the event that launched the genocide that killed 6 million Jews. The name Kristallnacht comes from the shards of broken glass that littered the streets after Jewish-owned stores, buildings, and synagogues had their windows smashed.

This year's gathering took place last Tuesday, and a small group of SSPX attempted to disrupt it by shouting the rosary and the "Our Father", and spreading pamphlets saying that "followers of false gods must be kept out of the sacred temple."

Archbishop Mario Poli

Buenos Aires Archbishop Mario Poli, named by Francis to replace him as Argentina's top church official, appealed for calm as others in the audience rose up to repudiate the protesters, who were quickly thrown out by police.

"Let there be peace. Shalom,"Poli then said, urging everyone to take their seats.

"Dear Jewish brothers, please feel at home, because that's the way Christians want it, despite these signs of intolerance," Poli said. "Your presence here doesn't desecrate a temple of God. We will continue in peace this encounter that Pope Francis always promoted, valued and appreciated so much."

Although SSPX members concerns about hosting an interfaith service in a cathedral/consecrated space are perhaps understandable, or at least theologically arguable, the fact that they stormed the Cathedral, behaved in a horrendous manner and made ridiculous remarks (i.e. that Jews worship a different God...a statement that contradicts the Catechism) is the real issue here.

Far from bringing to light any possibly legitimate concerns regarding non-Catholic use of consecrated Catholic space, the behavior of the involved SSPX membership can only serves to alienate themselves from the rest of the Church and sow dissent, strife and anger on all sides.

Rabbi Skorka, who co-wrote a book of dialogues with Bergoglio seeking common ground between Judaism and Catholicism, described the incident in an interview with Radio 10 on Wednesday:

Rabbi Skorka with Jose Bergoglio

"The cathedral was full, with people standing, prepared for a profound act of introspection, when a group of about 40 people began to recite from the Christian liturgy, the 'Our Father,' and began to hand out little pieces of paper saying that Jews were blaspheming the place,"

Skorka said protesters made cutting comments like "the Jews killed Jesus." He said one Jew confronted them, saying, "My grandmother died in Auschwitz," to which an activist replied, "Do you believe that lie?"

For the record, Catholic doctrine explicitly states that the Jews are not collectively responsible for Jesus' death, see CCC 597, f.

The Rev. Christian Bouchacourt, the South America leader of the Society of Saint Pius X, said on Wednesday that the protesters belong to his organisation and that they have a right to feel outraged when rabbis preside over a ceremony in a cathedral.

"I recognise the authority of the pope, but he is not infallible and in this case does things we cannot accept," Bouchacourt said in an interview with Radio La Red.

"This wasn't a desire to make a rebellion, but to show our love to the Catholic Church, which was made for the Catholic faith," Bouchacourt said."A Mass isn't celebrated in a synagogue, nor in a mosque. The Muslims don't accept it. In the same way, we who are Catholics cannot accept the presence of another faith in our church."

*A huge CRINGE at that comment*. Seriously, Catholics should do intolerant things because Muslims do them? This is your justification? I've been to Muslim Mosques before and met Imams and worshippers; friends and people willing to welcome us into their prayer community. I have been at a Mosque for prayer as well. I have also been to the Synagogue in Southend on many occasions. I consider I have made some excellent friends there who have taught me much about my own faith. I have documented here some of my understanding of this, and the realisation that the mere existence of Jewish people today constitutes a powerful proof of the reality of the Covenant.

Whilst I admire orthodoxy and commitment to Jesus and his Church, and often articulate my concern for the lack of orthodoxy amongst Catholics today, this story clearly hi-lights the line where dedication becomes dangerous. Where single-mindedness becomes closed-mindedness. The SSPX people who did this stuff are a disgrace and an embarrassment and nothing, no amount of mitigating evidence can contextualise that fact away. I repudiate them completely and feel sad that they felt what they were doing here was Catholic and that it was justified somehow.

What happens when we, the laity, start ignoring bishops and popes? What happens when we ignore the hierarchical structure handed down from the Apostles? Surely when we think we know better than Holy Mother Church, we become simply another faction, screaming for attention, and ignoring the action of the Holy Spirit? It's not always easy, but obedience is part of being Catholic.

How much damage has been done to the cause of sane Traditionalism by this madness? Consider that Pope Benedict XVI entered into a dialogue with the SSPX, indulged them even, giving them Summorum Pontificum and tried to bring them into the fold and these anti-Semitic ingrates responded with contempt because it wasn't perfect enough for them. Think seriously, why would any bishop, confronted with an embittered nucleus of isolationists like this possibly conclude that wasting a lot of time on mollifying them should be at the top of his 'to do' list? These are the people who are screaming about Pope Francis and being listened to by Rorate Caeli and company, and unsettling solid Catholics, and I won't have any truck with it. I'll make up my own mind thanks very much, and events like this are the evidence I will use to evaluate who deserves to be listened to and who does not. My allegiance will always be to Jesus Christ and His body-- The Church.

Popular posts from this blog

The legend reads:<<Oi Frankie, you have emasculated Congregations, suspended priests, decapitated the Order of Malta and the Franciscans of the Immaculate, ignored Cardinals...But where is your mercy?>>

Christians faced with the ravages of Bergoglio...Roma e' tappezzata - Rome is carpeted!

A source told me that the posters near the Vatican have already been covered up; but they ARE ALL OVER ROME!!

Newman, Letter to the Duke of Norfolk, Diff., II, 279-280

Here I am led to interpose a remark;—it is plain, then, that there are those near, or with access, to the Holy Father, who would, if they could, go much further in the way of assertion and command, than the divine Assistentia, which overshadows him, wills or permits; so {280} that his acts and his words on doctrinal subjects must be carefully scrutinised and weighed, before we can be sure what really he has said. Utterances which must be received as comin…

A few of days ago I posted about a new book called The Dictator Pope which has been really causing a stir as it claims to be the inside story of the most tyrannical and unprincipled papacy of modern times.

Now this was first posted on One Peter Five, which I love, but some criticise because it is a site critical of progressive catholic attitudes and modernism. Anyway some people these days dismiss certain sources because they tend to contradict their own agenda. I don't, as I have said here numerous times before, we are all parts of the body of Christ and that body has many parts (cf. 1 Cor 12). If I agree with everything someone says, I'm probably reading my own blog. We all get it wrong sometimes.

Anyway, I was concerned initially that this would be seen as a diatribe against the pope with an agenda. This would make the contents easier to dismiss.Almost read “The Dictator Pope”, of course it is all libelous gossip, the Church is not a dictatorship, is it? — raymond blake (@r…

Vaticanista Marco Tossati reports that even the faithless men who put Pope Francis on the throne of St. Peter are losing patience with his laissez faire, "make a mess" approach to being pope.

In his article on the AAS inclusion of the Buenos Aires directives, he remarks:
A cardinal of great renown, a former diplomat, who has served an impressive career at the head of Congregations and in high offices in the Secretariat of State, is said to have reproved the Pope for his actions [as Pope], saying to him essentially, “We elected you to make reforms, not to smash everything.” News of this conversation — if it can be called a conversation — has spread through the Vatican, because it took place at a high decibel level, which carried through the fragile barrier of the doors and walls. The cardinal in question was one of those who supported the candidacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio in the conclave of 2013.Gloria.tv reports that this is most likely the Argentinian Leonardo Sandri, the…