Rideau Hall ruckus: Canadians divided along political lines over Governor General’s performance in first year

by Ian Holliday | October 11, 2018 8:30 pm

One-in-four believe Julie Payette is “adjusting” and will eventually settle into her role

October 12, 2018 – After weeks of critical news stories[1] that prompted Governor General Julie Payette to apologize for how her office’s work has been perceived in its first year and reiterate her commitment[2] to the job, a new public opinion poll from the Angus Reid Institute finds Canadians with an opinion about the matter are more polarized about a traditionally apolitical figurehead and institution than might be expected.

Relatively few are following the news about Payette’s performance closely, but those who are tend to hold more negative views of the Governor General.

While most are unsure how to rate Payette’s performance as the Queen’s representative in Canada after 12 months in the role, the Governor General today enjoys little of the implicit goodwill the institute recorded[3] for her initial nomination to the post last year (at the time, 55% approved of her appointment).

Instead, those who have an opinion on the former astronaut are divided along political lines, with past supporters of the Conservative Party of Canada especially inclined to say she is doing a bad job (41% do) and that she is poorly suited to her current position (47%). Past Liberal and New Democratic Party supporters are less likely to have an opinion on Payette, and those who do have an opinion are more evenly divided.

More Key Findings:

Overall, one-in-four Canadians (25%) say Payette “is adjusting and will eventually settle into the role of Governor General.” Most are either uncertain (46%) or skeptical that she is a good fit for her position (29%)

Asked whether they believe the Governor General is doing a good job or a bad one, most Canadians (57%) are not sure, with the rest divided evenly between good (22%) and bad (21%)

Payette enjoys more favourable views in her native Quebec, where one-in-three (33%) say she is doing a good job, compared to 18 per cent who say she is doing a bad one. In every other region, those saying “bad job” outnumber those saying “good job” at least slightly

INDEX:

Good job or bad? Most Canadians can’t say

Relatively few confident Payette will settle into role

Low awareness helps drive uncertainty

Significant issue or overblown?

Good job or bad? Most Canadians can’t say

Julie Payette’s term as Governor General began with controversy. In a November 2017 speech, she took a mocking tone[4] when describing debate about creationism and climate change. Critics pointed out that – regardless of the merits of her arguments – they served to undermine the role[5] of the Governor General as an impartial embodiment of the state, politicizing what is supposed to be a non-political role.

More recently, criticism of Payette has centred on her lighter-than-average schedule[6] and reports that she dislikes the spotlight[7] that comes with the job.

The findings of this poll suggest some justification for fears about the role of Governor General becoming politicized.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appointed Payette, and those who voted for his Liberal party in 2015 are more likely to say she is performing well than poorly, though not by a huge margin. Those who voted for the opposition Conservatives, meanwhile, are more than two times as likely to perceive Payette’s performance in a negative light as they are to view it in a positive one:

Overall, despite the recent spate of bad publicity, most Canadians (57%) are uncertain about Payette’s performance as Governor General. Those who have an opinion are split fairly evenly:

It’s possible that right-of-centre voters would be more inclined than most to be displeased with any Trudeau-appointed Governor General, but the depth of their displeasure with Payette is both new and notable.

When the Angus Reid Institute asked about Payette’s nomination to the post in August 2017, past Conservative voters were among those most likely to disapprove of her nomination, but it was only one-in-four (25%) who did so. Nearly half (47%) of past Conservatives approved of her nomination.

Related – Most Canadians approve of nomination of Julie Payette to be Governor General[8]

While the two questions are different, the results suggest an erosion of trust in Trudeau’s chosen Governor General over time.

Regionally, Payette is better received in her home province of Quebec, where those who feel she’s doing a good job outnumber those who feel she’s doing a bad one by almost two-to-one. In every other region, this pattern is reversed, with more rating her performance as poor than good:

Relatively few confident Payette will settle into role

A question raised – either explicitly or implicitly – by much of the reporting about Payette’s first year in her vice-regal appointment is whether her struggles in the role are part of the adjustment period[9] experienced by many governors-general in the past, or an indication of some deeper misalignment between the post and the person who fills it.

Asked to weigh in on this question, a plurality of Canadians (46%) are unsure, and those with an opinion are again split along political lines. Nearly half (47%) of past CPC supporters say Payette is “poorly suited to the role of Governor General,” while fewer than one-in-five (18%) say she will settle into the position:

Again, Payette enjoys the most support in Quebec. More than one-in-three there say she is adjusting to her role, while fewer than one-in-four say the same in every other region of the country:

Low awareness drives uncertainty

The large number of Canadians who express uncertainty about Payette’s performance corresponds with the relatively small number of Canadians who are engaging with news stories about the Governor General.

This subject scores a 26 on the ARI Engagement Index, which measures how strongly the topics of ARI polls are registering with the public. This topic is tied with the issue of changes to net neutrality laws[10] south of the border for the lowest score recorded on the index in 2018. For comparison purposes, an “average” news story would score a 50 on the index (see notes on methodology at the end of this report).

As might be expected, those who haven’t been paying attention to news stories about Payette’s performance are more likely to be uncertain about it. Those who are paying the most attention, on the other hand, are the most likely to have an opinion, either positive or negative.

On whether Payette is doing a good job or a bad one, those who are seeing a lot of media coverage are divided:

On whether she is likely to adjust to the role, however, these most-engaged Canadians are more skeptical. Almost six-in-ten (57%) say Payette is poorly suited to the position of Governor General, compared to just 31 per cent who say she is going through an adjustment period.

Those who are disengaged from the story, again, are overwhelmingly unsure:

Significant issue or overblown?

Asked whether they feel Payette’s performance as Governor General is “a significant issue worthy of public discussion” or an issue that has been blown out of proportion by the media, Canadians are again divided, with three-in-ten choosing each side of this face-off and 41 per cent uncertain, as seen in the graph that follows.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, those paying the most attention to the issue are most likely to say that it has merit, while those who are just scanning the headlines are more inclined to see coverage of Payette’s first year as much ado about nothing:

The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.

For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here[11].