Say a little prayer for Lahore

The only thing as incredulous as the recent announcement by the Government of Punjab — it intention to construct a highway through the heart of Lahore — was the recent statement of the CEO of Fashion Pakistan Week that their glorified display of clothes was a “gesture of defiance towards the Taliban.”

Our fashion industry is as much of an industry as the Holy Roman empire was holy, Roman or an empire. Our designers are talented without doubt; but to suggest that parading scantily clad men and women down a runway behind the bunkers and barricades of a five-star hotel in Karachi is an act of defiance is, well, really stretching the limits to which the “security situation” can make a fool out of us. The foreign media took to the sound bite like a starving man to a steak and now, once again, Pakistan is portrayed as two-dimensional: a country teeming with brave designers, fighting Islamic militancy. My friend and critic Faiza S. Khan said it perfectly in her column at openthemagazine.com:

“One designer lamentably laid claim to being ‘a very brave woman’ for displaying her clothes on a catwalk at a five-star hotel in a country where women have been known to be murdered, maimed, mutilated and on occasion buried alive, where girls’ schools are routinely attacked and where, even at the best of times, women’s rights, outside of a tiny income bracket, are limited at best. Another designer called it an act of defiance in the face of the Taliban, glossing over the fact that fashion shows do, in fact, take place with some regularity in Pakistan, and if one must intellectualise this, then it could more honestly be described as a display of affluence in the face of a nation torn apart by the gaping chasm between rich and poor. Why the foreign media can’t ask Pakistani designers questions about their work and why they, in turn, yield to the temptation, like Miss Universe, of providing a sound bite on world peace is beyond me.”

Over the weekend, the Chief Minister of Punjab announced that he was allocating Rs3.15 billion for a project to widen Lahore’s Canal Road. The decision can only be described, at best, as a reckless adventure and, at worst, a catastrophe waiting to happen.

In 2006, the Traffic Engineering and Planning Agency (TEPA) of Lahore Development Agency (LDA) proposed to widen the Canal Bank Road, purportedly to reduce traffic congestion in the city. Because the project was over Rs50 million, the provisions of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act,

1997 kicked in and TEPA was constrained to engage the National Engineering Services Pakistan (NESPAK) to carry out an environmental impact assessment (EIA) of the project. This was done and the EIA was presented to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA), Punjab, in a public hearing where hundreds of Lahoris gathered to protest against the decision to deprive the city of one of its last surviving environmental heritages: the 14 kilometres of green belt that line the canal and make the street one of the most unique avenues in the world.

The EPA, Punjab approved the EIA but before the project could go any further, the Lahore Bachao Tehreek (an umbrella organisation of dozens of grass-root NGOs as well as WWF-Pakistan) challenged the veracity of the EIA as well as the approval granted to it by the EPA, Punjab. The case remains pending before the Lahore High Court.

The announcement by the mhief minister, giving the go-ahead for the project “after completion of design”, raises some important points. First, it is clear that the project approved by the CM is not the project that the TEPA had originally proposed in 2006. For one thing, the cost of this new project is nearly five times the cost of the original design. Also, according to news reports, the new project is set to incorporate new features along the Canal Road (like “beautifications” which, I must hastily point out, in the context of roads means nothing).

What this means is that the Government of Punjab cannot use the EIA approval granted to the original TEPA project. According to our laws which, the last time I checked still apply to everyone including the government, road projects in excess of Rs50 million must have an EIA carried out and should be approved by the EPA.

But the observance of legal and procedural formalities is not the primary concern that most Lahoris have about the road widening project. It’s an open secret that the Government of Punjab is operating on overdraft. In such a situation, it would seem bizarre that the provincial government would choose to spend Rs3.15 billion — nearly 10 per cent of the allocations it made last year to the three heads of health, public health and education — on one road in one city of the province.

Less than 20 per cent of Lahoris have access to cars. For the vast majority of the over eight million people who try and live and work in this city, transport and mobility are dependent on motorcycles, cycles and what is euphemistically referred to as “public transport” (there are less than 1,000 buses that ply the city’s streets). Ever since the previous tenure of Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, when the Punjab Road Transport Corporation was shut down, neither this nor the PML-Q government of Chaudhary Pervaiz Elahi have spent a rupee on public transport, which, by the way, is the only way to reduce traffic congestion in a city. Now we are told that a seriously broke government is about to spend billions of rupees it doesn’t have on a road it doesn’t need for people who don’t want or use it. Remarkable indeed.

In a presentation made by NESPAK on August 31 this year, the various options of widening the Canal Road were presented to the CM. According to NESPAK, all the road widening projects would “fail” by 2020 — meaning thereby that if the government didn’t do something to invest in public transport, and soon, the billion-rupee road widening adventure is, at best, a 10-year frolic. Is the Government of Punjab serious? Does the chief minister not know that, according to the Punjab Economic Survey of 2005 carried out by the Planning and Development Department (P&D), over 50 per cent of Punjabis live in slums? Who is this road being widened for?

All too often our politicians harbor the mistaken belief that infrastructure development is the only thing that will make our cities “modern”; that infrastructure is the only thing that will attract the foreign investment necessary to bring economic prosperity to a developing nation. But where are the examples of the success of this model? Our own urban Guru, Arif Hasan, in his brilliant essay “The world class city concept and its repercussion on urban planning in the Asia-Pacific region” demonstrates that our preoccupation with a modern city is also the root of our urban decay. But who in the government reads? Oh, save a little prayer for Lahore.

From The News, 13 November 2009 (http://www.thenews.com.pk/editorial_detail.asp?id=208278)

7 Comments so far

This time inshallah this road will be expanded… for those who like trees on the expense of human-beings, costly fuel, time and money can move some where where there are lots of tree… i will suggest Sawat

@virk: Your claim that by not widening the canal road, ‘human beings’ are being negatively affected is an outrageous overstatement. Have you even read the environmental assessment of cutting down so many trees and removal of a thriving mini-ecosystem in the heart of Lahore? Or have you thought about positive effects if this mammoth amount of funds are spent on establishment of an eco-friendly mass transit system spanned over buses, trams or even the much delayed Lahore Rapid Mass Transit (LRMT)…?

Rafay, how do we educate the educated like virk? The Word ‘Ignorant’ in English language sounds and feels quite harmless, but translated in our language as ‘Jahil’ it turns into the most demeaning epithet. No offence inteded Mr Virk, you are out of touch with reality.I suggest you go and watch Al Gore’s Academy award winning movie to start with. And then search the web for Enrique Panalosa and what he has to say about solving traffic problems.

Widening the road is not the answer. I understand why people like Virk feel it should be expanded – anyone who’s driven on the canal in the afternoon on a weekday should be able to understand why some people feel that way. There’s always this tremendous constant traffic jam, it’s deeply frustrating.

However, widening the road isn’t the answer because, as the article states, within ten years, the road would require “re-widening”. Chopping off all those trees effect human beings ya know.. we don’t have alot of acid rain here yet, but chop off all the trees and fill that space with cars, and you’d see how quickly that changes.

A better short-term solution would be, to widen some of the canal road’s tributaries, so people can take alternate routes. In the long run, we desperately need a mass transit system. I’d like to find out what the logic was, behind this govt’s shutting down the proposed underground met system for Lahore.

We as a culture need to come up with wholesome solutions, that are developed after taking all important factors under consideration. Far too often, we come up with “solutions” that create new problems, like chopping off trees. What’s next… chopping off our legs when they hurt? That’d definitely solve the leg-pain problem forever.

About Al Gore’s film though, I’d like to suggest you watch Fall of the Republic, The Obama Deception, and The Great Global-Warming Swindle. They’re all available on Google Video and bitTorrent. They offer an alternate conclusion to the one offered by Gore.

Guys, guys, calm down… Global Warming is just a “myth”. No need to panic, we need bigger roads exactly where there are signs of biodiversity. As far as polar ice melting, that is just “quddarat ka khel”…