Were you aware that abortions are now at their lowest levels since 1973? Amen to that?

"The number of abortions have declined substantially in most states since 2010, regardless of the number of restrictions palced on access to abortion.
Among the groups most active in promoting the restrictive laws is Americans United for Life. Its president, Charmaine Yoest, suggested that the broad... show more "The number of abortions have declined substantially in most states since 2010, regardless of the number of restrictions palced on access to abortion.

Among the groups most active in promoting the restrictive laws is Americans United for Life. Its president, Charmaine Yoest, suggested that the broad decrease in abortions reflected a change in attitudes among pregnant women.

‘‘There’s an entire generation of women who saw a sonogram as their first baby picture,’’ she said. ‘‘There’s an increased awareness of the humanity of the baby before it is born.’’

If you know anyone that is going to have an abortion please let them get a sonogram so they can see the baby. They will know it is a life. We can win this war!

Wonderful. If a group can convince women to decide to not have an abortion, more power to them. What is counter-productive is the notion of overturning Roe v. Wade. Abortion should be the choice of the woman involved and her health care professional. It is not the place of government. Whether or not you believe life starts at conception is immaterial.

Also, work on a legal definition for the start of life. That would reap more benefits.

Teen pregnancy rates are way down, too, so it's not that pregnant women are convinced not to have abortions by having restrictions. Fewer women are getting pregnant because effective birth control is more readily available, and in most of the US you can still get good sex education.

Contraceptive and sexual education can do that, teen pregnancy rates in the Bible states are high... just to get some context there.
States with the abortion rights figures demonstrate that restrictive laws are not needed to reduce the number of abortions significantly. That can be achieved, by helping more women obtain affordable, effective contraception, including long-lasting options such as IUDs and hormonal implants....the article mention that but some religious answerer just choose their favorite candy... honesty and humble are not supposedly cheered in your theist realm? or they cherry pick those out?

An army of Christians can topple the laws of governments and nations... States with the abortion rights figures demonstrate that restrictive laws are not needed ...read the same article you link, I wont dare to think that you are dishonestly or bias for Poseidon sake....

This is very sad news indeed. Obviously we need to step our efforts with Planned Parenthood to be sure more useless feeders (low income minorities) are being aborted. We have to keep the numbers of the useless feeders low, like weeds in a garden. You racist cons probably think fewer abortions are good thing because you are so racist!
Go Yanks!

However, to be honest, it may very well be that people are simply using morning-after and week-after drugs more that kill the child conceived, and liberals, who are literally just about the only ones actually doing abortions, don't count those as abortions.

Remember, that whole thing. They tried to say that it's not abortion when the child hasn't implanted into the uterine wall yet.

Liberals live in a world of delusion where they use words instead of reality to convince themselves. They call a child under the age of birth a fetus because they think that the word fetus somehow magically changes what the child is.

They refuse to call it abortion because the child never implanted in the uterine wall and technically started the pregnancy, therefore it magically changes what week-after and morning-after pills actually do, which is kill the conceived child not yet reached the uterine wall.

It's the exact same thing they do with every reality that contradicts them. They are literally the polar opposite of the liberalism of our founding fathers and Lincoln's day Republicans, yet they think that because they call themselves liberals, it makes them magically just like the founding fathers or Lincoln's day Republicans.

Even though liberals are progressing us into an age of government having all of the power again, like they did before the Revolution, into a day where some are treated special, like they do with blacks, into a day where some are legal to murder, like with children under the age of birth, or popular consensus today is under the age of 24 weeks in the womb, into a day where religion is controlled and regulated by government, into a day where people are not allowed to disagree with accepted establishment norms, i.e. the left wing, into a day where we trust the government and be grateful to the government for all we have,

They still think that because they call themselves "progressives," which traditionally means the exact opposite of all of that, that means that they are somehow better and "progressing" towards a better day with more freedom . . . . somehow.

Of course they are these damn idiot unmarried women under 20 have found out the child is a gold mine to them. o suggesting an abortion but some damn birth control especially after I am supporting the 3rd one and another on the way!