Comments

Jim nj,

I look at Horowitz Office as a sort of management audit operation. Typically, such an audit would come with a general scope of the audit, findings and recommendations. I don't believe that Horowitz first report was structured in this way. It would be a shame if the report we're all waiting for is just a recounting of some problems without any recommendations to correct them.

Of course any actions taken would depend on the Attorney General, the President and the Congress. But if what Horowitz provides is anything like what we recently saw concerning the FISA warrants, it will be terribly disappointing.

"I look at Horowitz Office as a sort of management audit operation. Typically, such an audit would come with a general scope of the audit, findings and recommendations. I don't believe that Horowitz first report was structured in this way."

Barbara, working off memory, since I don't have the synopses I posted here saved, that's about what the first report was like.

Lot's of sub-sections. Each one was here's what we looked at, here's who we talked to, here's what we found, we explored possible alternative courses of action.

Thanks, jim nj. I wasn't here at the time, so I missed all of your information on that report. Nonetheless, I'm glad to learn that Horowitz structured his report in that way.

According to what I just heard on the radio (Jay Sekulow's program), Horowitz has already turned over the FISA portion of his report to Durham for possible prosecution. That will be interesting. I would think those findings could lead to a reexamination of the entire Mueller enterprise.

I suspect some people, after looking at the new report, will re-visit the old report.

That may get interesting since many of those people left the FBI after that first report was issued.

Jim,

It sure will! Want I want is as complete an examination of the schemes and illegal activities carried out at the FBI and other agencies as can be publicly exposed. We have to trust that Barr and Durham will take it from there.

Trump Administration Withholding Over $100 Million of Military Aid to Lebanon

And the deep state can't understand why Trump won't do what they want.

"It came up in impeachment testimony by David Hale, the No. 3 official in the State Department, according to a transcript of the closed-door hearing released this week. He described growing consternation among diplomats as the administration would neither release the aid nor provide an explanation for the hold. “People started asking: What’s the problem?” Hale told the impeachment investigators."