Note: You are not logged into the forums. You will need to log in to post.-- If you do not have an account with us, you will first need to register (click here) before you can log in.-- If you already have an account, just click a "What's New?" button, and you will be prompted to log in.-- If you have any questions or need help, please click the various Help and FAQ links above and in the site header to learn more.

He was pretty bad today, even with the ridiculous awarding of the Player of the Game given by Fox Sports. That horrible screen pass should have been a pick 6 and that would have lost us the game. He's lucky his errors were not costly today, but they will be later on. This was not a good game by LT. His passes were all over the place.

Gonna have to go ahead and disagree with your assessment. He had a couple of bad throws, but for the most part he was pretty much on the money. For the impartial observers from the Fox broadcasting crew to name him Player of the Game... I think that says a lot. Our running game was going nowhere so Logan Thomas put our offense on his shoulders and moved the ball well enough to keep a potent ECU offense off the field. As for whether that pick-6 that wasn't would have lost us the game, I submit that it would not have lost us anything if our kicker could hit the broad side of a barn. (It's nice how the what-if game works, ain't it?)

*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*. *.*.*.*.*.*

I just wish we would STOP with the zone blocking read option crap and line up in the I, put a hat on a hat and run the tailback behind the fullback through a designated gosh-danged hole. There is NO REASON why this program shouldn't be able to find 5 fat guys who can move some people out of the way and clear a lane for a back to get through!

You titled this thread using aggressive and combatitive language and then act suprised when people react in kind. It's fascinating.

LT was fine today, he wasn't great and he wasn't bad. He was what he pretty much always is.

I objected to people responding to my post as if they hadn't read it, not because they were aggressive. If you aren't going to do a poster the courtesy of actually reading their post, why bother responding?

Gonna have to go ahead and disagree with your assessment. He had a couple of bad throws, but for the most part he was pretty much on the money. For the impartial observers from the Fox broadcasting crew to name him Player of the Game... I think that says a lot.

What it says, pretty much, is there was no other choice. Neither team had a back or receiver who stood out, and their QB threw 3 picks and fumbled in the end zone. Logan played pretty well on a day when both offenses pretty much sucked - or both defenses played lights out - or our offense sucked and our defense played lights out.

"Upon examination, it was clear that the spine of the PATT wasn't fully formed and, therefore, quite easy to snap." - Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species"

Your subject line is a troll, then you act deliberately obtuse when it gets the intended response. One doesn't need to be clever to state the obvious

Originally Posted by lawhokie

I objected to people responding to my post as if they hadn't read it, not because they were aggressive. If you aren't going to do a poster the courtesy of actually reading their post, why bother responding?

The problem is that "player of the game" is kind of a specious concept to begin with. The Hokie DL was the real "player of the game," but you have to give the nod to only one person.

Originally Posted by Baltimore Hokie

What it says, pretty much, is there was no other choice. Neither team had a back or receiver who stood out, and their QB threw 3 picks and fumbled in the end zone. Logan played pretty well on a day when both offenses pretty much sucked - or both defenses played lights out - or our offense sucked and our defense played lights out.

You're only as good as who surrounds you. He still had a few errant passes back then, the difference is receivers dropping balls and continuing routes. These guys don't keep running to get open or fight for the ball, heck they hardly catch it when he drops it in the numbers. He also lacks a running game and people key in on the pass.

Originally Posted by lawhokie

Do you remember 2011? Was LT 'not a very good QB' in 2011? Really? Then we had 2012, a disaster by all accounts, and Stiney was fired as OC because he was terrible. Now we have a QB with a new OC with half a brain, so let's see what happens when you play all freshmen at WR and RB. Only the most critcal, myopic fan could ignore the big picture here.

You're only as good as who surrounds you. He still had a few errant passes back then, the difference is receivers dropping balls and continuing routes. These guys don't keep running to get open or fight for the ball, heck they hardly catch it when he drops it in the numbers. He also lacks a running game and people key in on the pass.

My god the excuses never end. Everyone will see the truth when draft day rolls around