The question is misleading. I voted for who I wanted them to take but not at #3. And I really doubt the best QB choice at #3 is worth #3. Personally I would prefer a tradedown. And NO I don't want the Bears to take a QB at #3. IMHO it would be a wasted pick. Answer this question then if you feel differently. Which QB would you want to draft #3 to be your starting QB day #1? My answer would be none of the above. Which is why you don't draft a QB at #3. #3 pick should be a day one starter at whatever position they are qualified for.

The question is not misleading at all. I have no clue what you see that is misleading.

If the Bears are absolutely dead set on the idea of taking a QB at 1-3, who would you prefer?

It's pretty simple and straightforward. Nothing about what you, or anyone else, would do with the pick, other than taking a QB. Not a tradedown...not a defensive guy...a QB. It's not misleading, and it's not difficult.

Its not guaranteed the Bears take a QB at #3. I hope they arent foolish enough to do that. If they did I would hope they take the worst one. However for the sake of stupidity.....the one with the best chance of being successful it would be Watson. I just believe he can be had a lot later. My stupid guess is it really is going to depend on what SF does at #2. I think that if SF takes a QB it will start a run. It might scare the Bears into taking one at #3.

I wish somebody will trade up to #3 where we still get an instant starter. If we didn't have so many positions of need and QB were the only big need, I'd say take the best QB and hope and pray we don't draft an Osweiler or Garoppolo. I am just not enamored with this QB draft class.