Literary Masterpieces

Literary Masterpieces
Adrienne Johnson
University of Phoenix
December 09, 2013

A literary masterpiece is a piece of work that can withstand the test of time. What this means is that a particular piece of literary work can still be able to provoke a person’s thoughts and capture the interest of the readers all throughout the years that have passed, despite everything that goes on in the world around us and all of the current events that have and will take place. The topics and themes of these literary works will always hold true to their original purpose that was intended by the author and yet they will still connect with the people, as they originally did. For the purpose of this paper, I will explain what I expect literary masterpieces to be, I will explain the qualities that I expect them to have prior to completing the English 106 course, the experiences that I have personally had with literary masterpieces, as well as the contexts in which these experiences have taken place. I expect literary masterpieces to be written in an old fashion style. The reason that I expect this is because literary masterpieces are something that can withstand periods of time, therefore they were written at a much earlier time, and most likely the way that one speaks and writes at that time will differ from the way that people speak and write in today’s day and age. Although I expect some literary masterpieces to be dull and even painful, simply because they were written at a time that I am not necessarily familiar with an cannot relate too, I also expect them to be somewhat pleasant and beautiful, because after all, these literary masterpieces were written at a much earlier date but are still able to provoke our thoughts and capture the interest of the people today. Therefore this must mean that the literary masterpieces are pleasant and maybe even considered to be fun. Throughout all of my high school years, and even in the...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...﻿Loren Blanton
Professor Nenna
ENC 1102
7/12/14
Literary Analysis on Tabula Asiae
In the essay, “Tabula Asiae”, written by Michael Ondaatje, is a myriad of mythical imagery that describes old portraits of Ceylon. The descriptive details used throughout the nonfiction work is captivating and aids in describing Ondaatje brother’s wall, which is located in Toronto. The nonfiction piece of writing is a personal essay, which contains multiple personal experiences. There are to forms of nonfiction prose that are evident throughout Ondaatje’s essay; a slice of history and a sense of place. A slice of history provides rich content for the essay by providing historical facts and data about the island on the map. Without historical data about Ceylon, the reader would not be able to fully understand the map portraits that were lined up on the wall. A sense of place on the other hand, allowed Ondaatje to present a picture of Ceylon, by using sensory details that described the specific location. By using a slice of history and a sense of place, Ondaatje’s essay provides the reader with a clear understanding of the portraits of Ceylon.
According to Ondaatje, his brother’s wall in Toronto is covered with false maps. The maps are old portraits of Ceylon. Since the maps are described as portraits, they are considered to be artistic representations rather than records. (Hoye) The pieces of art are results from sightings, glances from trading vessels, and the theories...

...whether it can help readers lead better lives and improve their understanding of the world.
 Answer these questions:
&#61692; What ideas does the work contain?
&#61692; How strongly does the work bring forth its ideas?
&#61692; What application do the ideas have to the work's characters and situations?
&#61692; How may the ideas be evaluated intellectually? Morally?
TOPICAL/HISTORICAL
 Stresses the relationship of lit to its historical period
 Investigates relationships of this sort, including the elucidation of words and concepts that today's readers may not immediately understand.
 Common criticism is that in the extreme, it deals with background knowledge rather than with lit itself.
NEW CRITICAL/FORMALIST
 Focuses on literary texts as formal works of art, and for this reason it can be seen as a reaction against the topical/historical approach.
 Most brilliant in the formal analysis of smaller units such as poems and short passages.
 Discussions of point of view, tone, plot, character, and structure are formal ways of looking at lit from this point of view.
STRUCTURALIST
 Stems from the attempt to find relationships and connections among elements that appear to be separate and discrete.
 Attempts to discover the forms unifying all lit
 Important because it enables critics to discuss works from widely disparate cultures and historical periods.
 Furnishes an ideal approach for comparative lit and the method also enables...

...Literary Criticism
What comes to your mind when you hear the word “criticism”? Nowadays, most people look at criticism as something negative and personally, it has a negative connotation to me. Multimedia (for example, television, radio, etc.) has often depicted criticism as an antagonist. On reality TV shows, say, a singing competition, there is usually a panel of judges who criticize the contestants' performances particularly focusing on its fine points and flaws (more on the latter) and the audience usually “boos” the judges when they get antagonized by their criticisms. Also, people get nervous whenever they are given criticisms. For example, a student on a consultation day will most likely fidget when the instructor would give comments on an important term paper they were to submit for finals. Even if this kind of criticism is not necessarily destructive, it just gives this queasy, uncomfortable feeling whenever we hear it.
In fact, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines criticism as “an act of criticizing usually unfavorably.” This just shows that in the language of people (particularly those who speak English) “criticism” has evolved into something which has a negative connotation, when in fact it stemmed from something harmless. The English word “criticism” was derived from the French word “critique”, and in turn “critique” has roots from the Latin word “criticus” which means a judge, decider, or critic. The early English meaning of “criticism”...

...﻿While attending my course on “War and Literature”, and listening to the conversation, I found myself struck by an intellectual question presented by another student. This student asked, “When does paradox become hypocrisy?” Immediately afterwards I wrote the response, “A good war is a war that teaches it’s mistakes without one having to live with them.” At first I didn’t know if I had truly responded to the question. I analyzed both the question and response carefully through the literary devices and found myself satisfied with the responses standing.
When analyzing the response I first had to return to the question. “When does paradox become hypocrisy?” Referring to this question I had to ask if my response held a paradox. “A good war is a war that teaches it’s mistakes without one having to live with them.” Considering that a paradox is a statement that seems self-contradictory, and that “a good war” is the introduction to the response, suggested that “a good war” is a paradox.
However, why is it that “a good war” is a paradox? War can best be defined as active hostility. Good can also be best defined as being well behaved. Considering these definitions and the response, “a good war” would certainly be a paradox because active hostility is contradictory to being well behaved. However, most would assume that “a good war” was the responses paradox, and to assume otherwise would be insulting to someone’s intellect. So then one has to ask how it is so...

...﻿Marxist Literary Criticism
Karl Marx was a German philosopher, economist and sociologist as well as a political revolutionary. He, with the aid of Friedrech Engels, published theCommunist Manifesto in 1848. In the manifesto, Marx identified three social classes in his theory: The Aristocracy which refers to the small number of land owners who have control over the economy of the country, the Bourgeois class which refers to the high class people who have control over the industrial sites and factories and they rooted from the Aristocratic class that was influential before the industrial revolution, and finally the working class (Proletarian) who are victimized in the factories by the Bourgeois class. However, in the nineteenth century, the Aristocracy was already replaced by the Bourgeoisie class due the Industrial Revolution that happened earlier. Marxist literary criticism is based on the Marxist theory which is meant to be used in analysis of literary texts in order to see how economy and matter affect the personality and behaviors of the characters within the literary text (Hall: 78).
Marxist criticism suggests that these economic social classes will have their ideologies reflected in the literary textual representations, thus, it is important for critics to be fully conscious of these classes and their ideologies in order to give a fuller and authentic description or analysis of the texts that they...

...Solidad Reyes’ view on Literary History, Literary Theory and Literary Criticism
In an attempt to solve different problems and issues in Literary Studies such as the effects of major trends to modern Philippine Literature, role of the audience and critics in studying text, three areas of literary study was explained, literary history, literary theory and literary criticism and their integration to Philippine Literature. Each area was explained based on their individual roles or impacts in the study of Philippine Literature.
The first area discussed was literary history, stating that among the three, this area is mostly used or studied by various scholars. Reasons for this are very obvious, history a big part of everything. Through the study of literary history, their view of the texts published in modern day will be affected. Even the content of present texts are very much affected, examples of these would be collections of autobiographies of past individuals and other recollections of various past events. Literary history also tries to put the reader to a particular period in time, specifically from the past.
The study of this area also changed the standards of critics, which led to the stricter reviewing of old text as to whether or not they are going to be considered or given the label of Philippine Literature...

...Literary Criticism
Critics throughout the years agree that F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby is one of his most renowned accomplishments in his entire career. Although there are a few who believe this novel was like one of his previous ones. It portrays not only his understanding of the Jazz Age of being happy and having money but also the loss of traditional. Some critics found his novel entertaining, “a real attention grabber”, while others found it a bit negligible.
In 1942 Alfred Kazin a highly respected American Literary critic wrote that it was Fitzgerald's understanding of the character Gatsby that enabled him to depict so skillfully his tragedy and, even more consequently, the illusory nature of the American dream(Twentieth Century Literary Criticism Vol 14 151). Fitzgerald always saw life as a glamour, even though he could pierce that glamour to write one of the most moving of American tragedies in The Great Gatsby(TCLC 151). Kazin was not the only critic who thought highly of Fitzgerald's book. Others believed that The Great Gatsby compared to his previous novels, was by far one of his best books.
Other critics ,along with Frederick J. Hoffman, throughout the years wondered how Fitzgerald managed to write such a successful novel. In 1951 Hoffman wrote,
“The time Fitzgerald spent in the writing of The Great Gatsby was also devoted to a carefulexamination of his weaknesses and a consolidation of whatever formal...

...Assignment 2
Literary Analysis Essay
In- Class Assignment
500+ words
27-28 July
15% Week 4
Literary Analysis Essay
• What is it?
– Analyzes literary text. How?
• By tackling any number of aspects of the content such
as the:
–
–
–
–
Aesthetic
Technical
Linguistic
Thematic (economic, political, philosophical, sociological,
psychological, etc.)
• It concentrates and uses the text (not real life) as its
base.
Literary Analysis Essay
• Why do we write them?
– To help cement our understanding of the text
through the creative process of writing.
– To help me, the teacher, understand what you
have gleaned from the text;
– And how you have reacted to the themes and the
details of the text.
Literary Analysis Essay
• How do we write them?
– There are many ways…aspects. This is the beuty of literature!
and no single correct one as long as you prove your point and
built your argument on evidence, implication, elaboration ,
analysis of the text .
– You will be given a question or proposition regarding a theme
or aspect of the text.
– Some examples of questions include:
• How does Dickens’ portrayal of children differ in Great Expectations
from the depiction in Oliver Twist?’
• ‘”Macbeth is a victim of circumstance.” Discuss.
Literary Analysis Essay
• How do we write them?
– When analysing a literary text, it is important to
grasp the main themes.
– So, it’s not only the text we...