U.S. Army Bans DJI Drones

An August 2 memo cites ‘increased awareness of cyber vulnerabilities’ with drones from China’s market-leading DJI.

The U.S. Army has ordered troops to stop using consumer drones made by Chinese manufacturer DJI, according to an Aug. 2 memo seen by Defense One and confirmed by two Army officials.

“Cease all use, uninstall all DJI applications, remove all batteries/storage media from devices, and secure equipment for follow on direction,” reads the memo from Lt. Gen. Joseph H. Anderson, the Army’s deputy chief of staff for plans and operations.

Said one Army soldier about the decision, “I wonder how DJI camera stabilizers (which have no memory) can send information back to mainland China.”

DJI drones “are the most widely used non-program of record commercial off-the-shelf UAS employed by the Army,” the memo says.

They’ve also been the world’s most popular consumer drones for several years running, according to the German-based analytics firm, Drone Industry Insights.

DJI products have not proliferated across the Army and onto the battlefield the way more tactical UAVs like Pumas or Switchblades have – both made by U.S. manufacturer Aerovironment.

But, the Army’s Aviation Engineering Directorate has already “issued over 300 separate Airworthiness Releases for DJI products in support of multiple organizations with a variety of mission sets,” according to the memo, which amends existing Pentagon guidance on the domestic use of unmanned systems, finalized in February 2015.

The decision might cause no more than a small headache for units using DJI products – including the 10 or so Fort Hood public affairs soldiers who are licensed remote pilots, according to one Army official.

But it is still a headache of inventory and secure storage, since it covers “any system that employs DJI electrical components or software including, but not limited to, flight computers, cameras, radios, batteries, speed controllers, GPS units, handheld control stations, or devices with DJI software applications installed.”

The memo “could have a huge impact on DJI,” said Brett Velicovich, a former Army intelligence soldier who now runs Expert Drones, a consumer drone firm in Alexandria, Va.

But the unnamed security vulnerabilities could affect the U.S. military — and not just those stateside.

“There are U.S. special operators in Syria using DJI products,” said Velicovich. “So I get it. I’m glad [the Army is] finally doing something about this.”

DJI accounts for at least 70 percent of the commercial unmanned aircraft vehicle market. In recent months, its Phantom series of UAVs has drawn the attention of hackers who’ve been able to break into and manipulate the drone’s GPS software, punching holes in the “geofences” that sought to keep the drones out of no-fly zones.

But hackers aren’t the only ones who can manipulate the drones long after they’ve left the factory floor, been plucked from a store shelf, and flown around the world. In May, DJI officials told users to register their drones with the company — or else the UAVs would suffer cuts to speed and range, even the ability to stream video.

The company claimed it was part of a plan to upgrade its geolocation data to make its UAVs safer. (For what it’s worth, the two references cited in the Army memo — one a classified Army study — were produced just days after DJI’s May 22 announcement; and one month after DJI added portions of Iraq and Syria to its geofence system.)

But it was a wake-up call to many in the industry, Velicovich said: “If they can turn off our drones, what else can they do with those things?”

SHOULD READ

SHOULD READ

A quick overview of any Video Management System (VMS) platform will reveal a myriad of options to provide sustained operational status. Primary and secondary databases, redundant and co-located recording platforms, and critical service fail-over. The evolution of VMS platforms lend themselves to sustaining critical operations and in some cases delivering five-nines of availability for live and archived video.

Single Post

I have mentioned in this space before that I have the opportunity to travel a lot and that this has afforded me an excellent view into how airports are run. But my perspective is not limited to their inner workings. In fact, from my office here in Montreal, I can see the O6L and 24R runways at the P.E. Trudeau airport. This means that, every once in a while, I get to watch these feats of engineering and technology move through the air. And I am reminded of the incredible precision required to get so many planes safely through take-off and landing every day. At the same time, I also know that any disruption on the airfield —no matter how small— can delay flights or threaten security.

Single Post

Open up any tech publication and you'll find new and innovative ways that artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are permeating every aspect of our lives. This week alone, one company announced that it was battling fraud using AI and another is analyzing Twitter feeds to find romantic matches. So why are AI and machine learning getting so much buzz in security?

Single Post

Dedrone, the market and technology leader in airspace security, announced that its team of Echodyne Corporation, Squarehead Technologies and Battelle, won first place at ThunderDrone’s “Game of Drones” outdoor demonstration at Nellis Air Force Base and AFWERX enclave, June 18-20. Hosted by AFWERX, Team Dedrone bested five other teams in the last of three ThunderDrone rapid prototyping events focusing on countering small, unmanned aerial drones. Team Dedrone successfully demonstrated the capabilities of a layered detection, tracking, classification and mitigation solution that defends protected airspace against aerial drone threats.

Single Post

It’s time for the Fifth Annual Physical Security and Video Surveillance Market Influencers Nominations. Nominate yourself –or that influential market leader– that others should listen to and take note of their subject matter expertise and industry foresight. Security.World will take nominations through July 31st, 2018.

Resolution terms may be used to describe the size of the image captured at the camera, transmitted over a wire, displayed on the screen, or recorded on the hard drive. CIF, QCIF, 2CIF, 4CIF, and Megapixel are common terms for resolution. When comparing megapixel camera specifications you may notice pixel …