Seems like all the good will Warner Brothers engendered from their sneak peek at Ben Affleck under the cowl has been squandered away with the reveal of the dumbest superhero movie title in the history of dumb superhero movie titles.

I guess they took my advice? Because they did drop the “VS” and just went with a “V” instead. Now, the internet has already made every conceivable “Batman and Superman in court” joke it could make — because the internet’s got jokes — but the issue remains: someone in the braintrust at WB Pictures actually signed off on that title.

Ya know, maybe the “V” in question isn’t supposed to be “Vs.” Maybe it’s the roman numeral for five, and that Batman V Superman is really the fifth movie in the Nolanverse franchise? I mean, Affleck’s supposed to be playing an older, established Batman after all. Maybe he really is supposed to be Bale’s Batman. I already laid out how to connect The Dark Knight trilogy and Man of Steel before. Even if this were the case — and it clearly isn’t — it doesn’t really help.

Beyond the utter ridiculousness of the title — seriously, just go to the movie’s official website and gawk at how awful that URL looks in your browser — there are other problems. ComicsAlliance has already pointed out many of them here. The main issue I have with it is that Superman gets second billing in his own movie! Remember, this is supposed to be a sequel to Man of Steel.

But the subtitle Dawn of Justice (which is also V corny, BTW) doesn’t hide the fact that this movie is less sequel to Superman than prequel to Justice League. Truth be told, most DC fanboys have been salivating at the idea of a full blown JLA movie for years. The fact that we’re finally getting one should make us all jump for joy. Unfortunately, it’s just clear that the folks ultimately charged with bringing the League to the big screen just don’t get it.

The architects of the DC Cinematic Universe. Ugh.

The other thing that irks me about the title? Where the hell am I supposed to put the blu-ray on my shelf?! I keep my discs in alphabetical order — but made exceptions for The Dark Knight and Man of Steel, which are with the Batman and Superman movies, respectively. So should this go with the B’s or the S’s? It’s still, ostensibly, the sequel to Man of Steel, so it should follow that, right? That’s the real reason why I wanted the title to be Man of Steel: Dark Knight.

I had kind of hoped they would stick with the Superman bynames and make the second one “Last Son of Krypton” or some variation thereof where we could deal with the aftermath of MoS, but considering that Batman can play the early side of being a last son (of Wayne).

speaking as a comic nerd with a very limited budget, may I suggest that you save your money. Don’t buy the blu-ray. Forget being a completionist. Buy a blu-ray of a series you actually like or a movie that maybe didn’t get a big global release. or if you got Netflix watch some of their cool exclusives.

not sure if AMC’s “Into The Badlands” is on Netflix. but they have lots of other good series I heard positive reviews from friends and online sources I trust.

I suggest Zatoichi: The Blind Swordsman 2003 version. We had one copy at our library that I rented, enjoyed, but could not afford a copy myself. Suggest titles of diverse films, books, comics for your local libraries.

Maybe even donate some copies or buy extras, particularly for children library or places that serve low income populations.

I hope y’all keep reviewing, analyzing, loving comics, films, etc. But I also hope the next movie you see makes you much happier than Batman vs Superman.

PS my tentative nerd title was “Fall of Superman” (back when I thought it might be connected to Nolan Batverse in some way. for the parallel or pun contrasting Dark Knight Rises (Batman) to another hero (Supes) falling from grace and losing his principles.