Matter: Jeff Sukkasem Birth Certificate ............................................................................................................................ 1 Passport Photo ............................................................................................................................. 2 Letter from Mostow to Johnson (9-4-07) ................................................................................ .3 Guardianship Order ...................................................................................................................... 4 Letter from Bowers with Report ................................................................................................ 5 Letter from Weast to BOE (8-25-08) ......................................................................................... 6 BOE Decision and Order ............................................................................................................... 7 PHLO Letter to Bresler (11-19-08) ............................................................................................. 8 PHLO Letter to Grasmick (11-19-08) ......................................................................................... 9 PHLO Letter to DeGraffenreidt (11-21-08) .............................................................................. 10 Letter from Asst. Attorney General to PHLO (1-12-09) .......................................................... 11 PHLO Letter to Mostow (1-30-09) .......................................................................................... 12 PHLO Letter to Mostow (3-10-09) ............................................................................................. 13 Signed Affidavit of Legal Guardian ............................................................................................ 14 Letter from Mostow (3-27-09) ................................................................................................... 15 Letter from members of MD Gen. Assembly to Weast (5-13-09) ........................................ 16 PHLO Letter to Mostow (6-4-09) .............................................................................................. 17 Signed Statement from Legal Guardian ....................................................................................... 18 PHLO Letter to Bowers (6-11-09) ............................................................................................... 19 Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6COU'NTYof SAN:TA CLARA PUf5UC HEALTH 222Q, MOORPARK AVE., SAN JOSE, CALlFqRNIA 95121;1 .1· , : ," .' ' " ,~'(I , '. "CERTIFIED COpy 6F VITAL RECORDs Scl'ATIlOF CA;~~~ ,} -ss ' SECD ! ,_ COtJ'NTY-OFSAN'TACLARb' DATE ISSUED -, , Ttll~!s a true at\geX~fQproaucUonqflhe doc-umept OffiCi~~;n;jlls.lered~nd placed ~LJ):~~U·H() on file In lfi&VrtA~ R"CO~'SECTI~N, DEPAflTME'N1 OF l'.YBI:te-HEAL'tH. , MAl;\,.n tN~.,, FEN'S "T,m H!";f IB , , HEAlTH~Sle:~~~~STAAR , ' TW~ CQ~Y,~i.'Yl!lid :\!'!)~~~~lpr¢p~re<:\Qn en~""a'Y.ed1)onler ilj~[!layi.!\~ se;il ~dili~t1)!'!'< o:f:~~!lt~~r<i~ .• ' __ ~~_~~. ____ ~~~~~,~~~.·~~c~~ ___ ~ __ Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Tbe Yrn'I'tti-1T ftj ~'!tr/( 1)(li/(. ,"'1);,'<".'1/\!rlh'i jJ(T"br /'IJf/lJolr Nil wb,w: if {Nfl)' ,"!!!I(CUi jrJ jn'n,JiI (lj :J.k ~ ',,!h'cT SfdJr't W/IlH."r! /h'i"';J, (I) iii/f..\" wiJ/y"r/d,·idY or hillt!rtlil:"{' aut! 1/1 ~d.\l' {'l'/n,d 10 giel' ,,/I Id 11 jltl ,rit! dial /ily,f,'Oir<l" I." tI(' IrriJ,"t:r iNH}(:;-If t/{tJP!1J /M$,','/NJJ'I, .'{l1I> dffl,,;,1i :lith-r,' /ll"Il!N"/i"!If /~'giril!lt:L NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED S\l(J1-,~fl~ /.~om ( Apul\t(.~ SUKKA:sEM G:!'.':~~FI!S! PrCjlC{!'ls-ltt0tlilUU& 711860800 Niltil):1<lH1,y /t~a!!()rklIM /1'4aehmalld#r\ U~ITED STATES Of AM"ellr,A Dam of birth! .[I~te·.dB milssant:4;h~CI:~ ;j(tjtaCiltwi:ll~ : : 21 NOIt>t9.l!4.':,'':·:'''' ,;',' ,; , PR;:!! cl b;1Iw'{Ueu'.g~,;1}Ill~hlice)\~' de ·lla£lmbr.lb~· ' CAUFO!'tNlJ,\,'I1I'~A . .. ~. oijl'-"'f~~,j"';I<il>' :~~;j~:: "'c' .; .;~~t;. " "!: IrotillJ1(~ti1:~'i?~ucll{iIl' oej);,<in{e ' Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Mrs. Boonyawee Johnson 10949 Deborah Drive Potomac, MD 20854 Dear Mrs. Johnson: ''"'''O>lUvU''.y Compliance Office Montgomery County Public Schools 850 Hungerford Drive, Room 200 Rockville, Maryland 20850 (301) 315-7324 September 4, 2007 Rc: Jeff-8ukkasem The Residency Compliance Office has denied your request for a tuition waiver for the following reason(s): Parents are currently in Thailand Student is here for school purposes Documents submitted documents do not justify a tuition wavier If you wish to appeal this decision, you may do so within 10 days by submitting your request along with new documents to this office. If you wish to appeal at a higher level, you may do so by calling 301-279-3997 to schedule a or by writing to: Mr. Lan'y Bowers Chief Operating Officer 850 HUngerford Drive Rockville, MD 20850 Please do not hesitate to call our office if we can be of further assistance ASM:sv.'P Copy to: Financial Registrar File Sincerely, ()",:V:;;-~~~'[J~ Anita S. Mostow, Ed.D. Residency Compliance Office Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Q MCPS ~ MOJTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC ~~~~?~~ ~ 301-279-3997 April 25, 2008 Ms, Kanya Amornpimonk-lll -Re: Jeff Sukkasem Dear Ms. Amompimonklll: On March 26, 2008, you met! with Mrs, Elaine B. Lessenco, hearir,g officer for tuition waive:' appeals. I have designated to :!vIrs. Lessenco the responsibility of meeting parents/guardians who are appealing tuition w9ivers. FolloWing the hearing, Mrs. Lesle'nco provides me with information and recommendatIons, A copy of her report is enclosed" I" I I have reviewed Mrs, Letsenco,s report, concur with her findings, and adopt her recommendations. I am deny'ng your request for Jeff to attend North Bethesda Middle School on a tuiti on-free basis. The D partment Df Financial Service has been advised of my decision, If you wish to pay the reqClired . uition, you may contact Mrs. Lessenco at 301-517-5981, and she wil! assist you in locating scfuools that have available space for Jeff. Once the availability of space has been determined, YiU will need to contact the Department of Financial Services at 301-279-3628, and that office will work .out a payment schedule with you. After the initial payments are made, you may enroll Jeff ,iI, i If you wish to appeal m( dec~sion, you may cio so by wtiting to Ms. ;:-.:Jancy Navan'o, president, Board of Education, 850 HUJlgerford Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850, within 30 of the date of this letter. LAB:sn Enclosure Copy to: Dr. Weast Dr. Lacey Dr, Brown Mrs. Ltssenco Dr. MaslOW ~1r. SUhmer -----.. ----'--" Sincerely, ~~B~ Chief Operating Officer ,....Ms. Akpan Drive + Rockville'. l'Aaryland 20850 Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6April 23, 2008 MEMORAJ:'.l'DUM 1 To: Mr. Larry A. B wers, Chief Operating Officer From: }Subject: Elaine B. Lessero, Hearing Ofl:1cer Tuition Waiverf)~peal: JeffSu:<kasem; DOB: 11121/94; North Bethesda!Middle School; Grade 7 On Wednesday, March 26, 2098, I met with Jeff Sul<kasem, Ms. Zionne Akpan, his attorney, and :vis. Kanya Amompimonkul, his guardian petitioner, regarding their appeal of the denial of a tuition waiver. Ine Residency Comnliance Office had sent a letter of denial, dated September 4, 2007, because Jeffs parents a:-e resicib.nni ts of Thailand. The Residency Compliance Office determined that the student is here for school p~oses; and the documents submitted do not justify a tuition waiver. I At our meeting, Jeff reported tllat he had come to Montgomery County, Maryland, from Thailand, in Mareh 2007, in order to go to school here. He reported that his mother could not afford to send him to school in Thailand. He ~tated that he has one sister, who is 17 years old, attending schoo: in Thailand. Jeff further reporteli that he had spent tinle visiting Thailand from June until August 2007, and has been a resident in this county since that time. I Ms. Akpan reported that Jeffslparents a:-e divorced, and that leffs mother has physical custody of his sister, who spends time w!th both parents. Jeff's father is employed; his mother is not and spends her time eating for her lelderly mother, who is not well. Ms. Akpan reported that Jeff was born in the United States wh~n his parents were living here, and that Jeff attended school in California from Kindergarten tfough Grade 4. He at~ended school in Thailand for Grades 5 and 6, but did not do well because oflr..nguage and cultural dlfficultles. Ms. Al<pan provided a copy oil the Petition for the Appoi1ltment of a Guardian of the Person Minor, which has been filed with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland. I noted that guardianship alone would nj' be sufficient to grant a tuition waiver, since there must be a documented crisis that would revent the child from living with his biological parent. Ms. Akpan stated her belief that a tuition .alver should be granted for Jeff on the basis of the family's financial difficulties, and Jeffs cultural tfflculties. I explained that there was no pocumentation of the family's financial situation that would allow Montgomery County Public S~OOIS (MCPS) to waive tuition. In addition, I explained that Jeffhad done sufl:1ciently well in scho I in Thailand for the International Student Admissions Office to recommend his placement in rade 7. I provided copies of the MCPS Policy JED, Residency, Tuition, and Em'oliment, and egulation JED-RA, Residency and Tuition, which clarify the school I Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Mr. Larry A. Bowers system's position with respect case until documentation of 2 April 23,2008 tuition waivers. Ms. Akpan requested that I delay my report on the situation could be obtained from Thailand. Nearly a month has elapsed I met with Ms. Akpan, Ms. Amompimonkul, and Jeff, regarding their tuition waiver appeaL I am concerned that Jeff has not been in school since he 81Tived in the United Slates in March 2007. However, since no information has been received to document a C11Sis tnat would prevent Jeff ftom living with his parents in Thailand, I recommend that a tuition waiver be denied in this case. I EBL:sn Copy to: Dr. Weast Dr. Lacey Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6MEMORANDUM Office of the Superintendent of Schoo Is MONTpOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Rockville, Maryland August 25, 2008 To: Members of the J?oard of Education Subject: ',nyD. W"",I, ,up,"nt~d~~ Board Appeal 2008-1 4-Jeff Sukkasem Fron: Zionne Akpan, Esq. is appealinle denial of a tuition waiver on behalf of Ms. Kanya Amompimonkul, who was approved as Jeff Su' sem's legal guardian by the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, on April 21, 2008, 'th the proviso that the appointment of a guardian should not be considered a waiver oftuition. Mrs. Elaine Lessenco, hearing Efficer, met with Ms. Akpan, Ms. Amompimonkul, and Jeff on March 26, 2008. Her report to . Larry A. Bowers, chief operating officer, dated April 23, 2008, recommended denial of a t\lition aiver because there was no documentation of a crisis that would justify a waiver of tuition. l\.1r, Bowers 1ccepted this recommendation in his letter to Yls. Amompimonkul dated April 25, 2008. In her letter of June 12, 2008, Ms. Akpan appealed to the Board of Education and forwarded documents from Jeff, mother regarding her rationale for requesting a tuition waiver. The documents forwarded from Thaihjnd had been scanned and were so difficult to read that clear copies were requested, as Ms. Akpan had s~ggested in her letter. several telephone calls and electronic messages, no clear copies have been received. I With the opening of the new school year, I would like to resolve this case. It is my belief that the documents forwarded, as best as ~ can read them, do not document a crisis that would prevent Jeff from living with his mother and attending school in Thailand. Jeff's mther's monthly salary of 4700 baht is about average in Bangkok, according to the Thai National Statistical Office. Jeff's mother's letter reiers to her financial situation, but also emphasizes Jeff's desire to live and study in the United States, where he is more comfortable with the langpage and the culture, It is my opinion that there is insufncient documentation of a crisis that would warrant a tuition waiver. I believe that this is a matter of Jeffs desire to live and to study in the United States. Therefore, I recommend that the Board of E~ucation uphold the decision of the chief operating officer to deny this appeal. I LAB: etc Copy to: Mr. Bowers Dr. Lacey Dr. Brown Mrs. Lessenco Dt. Mostow rvtlr. Sumner 1\.1js> Akpan Mis. Amompimonkul Ms. Bresler Mr. Clancy Ms, King Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6I BEFORE TIlE BOA~ OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNW IN THE MATTER OF I BOE APPEAL NO. JErF SUKKA.8EM : 2008·14 I DECISION AND ORDER This matter is an appeal of a denial of a tuition waiver for Jeff Sukkasem. Jeffs parents, who are divorced, ltve in Thailand. Jeff was born in the United States at a time when his parents lived herf and Jeff attended school in California from kindergarten through Grade 4. Jeff atte9ded school in "lbailand for grades 5 and 6. Jeff has since returned to the United States and is now living with Ms. Kanya Amornpimonkul, who was appointed as his guardian. Jeff, who is now 13 years old, resides with Ms. Amornpimonkul in BetThesda. I The Residency Compliance Office denied the request for a tuition waiver. The compliance office cited as reasons for the denial that Jeffs parents currently reside in Thailand, that Jeff is in Mobtgomery County for purposes of attending school, and that the documents submitted do1notjustify a tuition waiver. Through an attorneJ, the decision of the Residency Compliance Office was appealed to Mr. Larry A. ~owers, chief operating offIcer, acting as the designee of the superintendent. Mr. Bowe~s referred the matter to Ms. Elaine B. Lessenco to act as a hearing officer to prepare aad submit a report to him with recommendations. As palt of her review, Ms. Lessenc4 met with Jeff, Ms. Zionne Akpan, his attorney, and Ms. AmornpimonkuL Acprding to Ms. Lessenco, Jeff stated that he had come to Montgomery County from Thailand in March of 2007 in order to attend school here. He stated that his mother could not afford to send him to school in Thailand. His attorney reported that Jeffs parents fe divorced and that Jeffs sister resides with Jeffs mother. Jeffs mother is not employ~d and spends her time caring for her elderly mother. Jcffs father is employed in Thail~d. The attorney also submitted a petition for appointment of Ms. Amornpimonkul as g ardian (which was later granted by the Circuit Court of Montgomery County). The attorney asserted that a tuition waiver should be granted for Jeff on the basis of his famJ;"s financial difficulties and Jeffs cultural difficulties when he attended school in Thaili d. In her report, Ms. 4essenco stated that she explained that the appointment of guardianship alone is not srfficient to grant a tuition waiver and that there must be a documented crisis that wo~ld prevent the child from living with his biological parent. She states she further eXPlajned that there was no documentation in this case of a family financial situation that wo Id warrant a tuition waiver. Jeffs attorney requested that Ms. Lessenco's report be dlayed until documentation of the financial situation could be obtained. In her report, da~ed nearly a month after the conference, Ms. Lessenco stated , Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6that she still had not reeeived any documentation of a financial crisis, and recommended that the tuition waiver be denied. By letter of April 25, 2008, Mr. Bowers informed Ms. Amornpimonkul that h]. concurred with Ms. Lessenco's findings and adopted her recommendation that the tui! on waiver be denied. By letter dated June 2, 2008, through her attorney, Ms. Amornpimonkul (whose petition for guardianship had by this time been granted) appealed the decision of the chief operating officer to the BOafd of Education. In that appeal, the attorney reiterated the basis for the earlier request. ~he stated that Jeff had been born in California but moved to Thailand with his parents a~er the third grade. Jeff attended school in Thailand but had difficulty because of the la9guage and cultural differences. According to the attorney, Jeff had to repeat the third Igrade in Thailand. The attorney stated that Jeffs parents divorced and his mother beqame his primary caretaker. Jeffs sister also lives with the mother, as does the matern~l grandmother. The attomey represents that the maternal grandmother has serious health problems that require Jeffs mother to care for the grandmother. I The attorney asserts Ithat Jeffs mother has financial problems that prevent her from taking care of Jeff in~ight of her other obligations. The attorney attached several documents that she contend. support the argument of financial hardship (the documents were later resubmitted in a ore legible form). I In response, the supdrintenctent contends that the documents do not document a crisis that would prevent ~eff from living with his mother and attending school in Thailand. The superintendent asserts that Jeffs father's salary is about average in Bangkok, according to the Thai National Statistical Office. The superintendent also notes that the letter in support oft\le request for a waiver also emphasizes Jeffs desire to attend school in the 1.1 .S. The superintendent states his belief that the matter is one of a desire to live and attend school in thelUnited States, and, thus, not suitable for a waiver oftuition. The matter was corlsidered by the Board of Education in closed session on September 9, 2008. Afterf:.conSideration of the materials submitted by the parties, the Board concluded that the m tter could be decided without the conduct of an evidentiary hearing, referral to a hearin examiner, or oral argument. The Board finds th1t the denial of the waiver of tuition in this matter was appropriate. Under Policy J~D, ReSidency, Tuition, and Enrollment, qualified SChool-age individuals who have establiShed bona fide residence in Montgomery County are to be admitted free to Montgome y County Public Schools. Bona fide residence is defined as ones "principal residence, naintained in good faith, and does not include a residence established for convenience or the purpose of free school attendance in the Montgomery County Public Schools." Jeff Sukkasem -2-Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Policy JED also prov~des that " ... a qualified student residing with a courtappointed guardian who has ian established bona fide residence in Montgomery County shall be presumed to be a reirident student provided that the guardianship was obtained for reasons concerning the child and not for the primary purpose of attending school or for the convenience of the pet'sons involved." , In this matter, the Bo~rd finds that the evidence in the record establishes that the guardianship and, consequel:\tly, the student's residence in Montgomery County, was established for the purpose of attending school in the United States, and more particularly, in Montgomery[ County. The record contains numerous references to the desire to have the student re~ume and continue his education in this country. Moreover, the record does not demonstrlate a financial or other crisis that requires the student to live with his court-appointed guardian in Montgomery County. While the student apparently was in the custody of his m~ther in Thailand, the student's father appears to have steady and gainful employment in t1~at country. The Board also obse'es that, although the petition for guardianship was granted, the order specifically states hat it will not be considered a waiver of tuition that may be assessed by MCPS. For the foregoing re sons, the decision of the chief operating officer is hereby affirmed. In a public session immediately following the closed session, the Board of Education voted to affirm t decision of the chief operating officer for reasons set forth in this written decision and rdef. September 2008 Stcph· Abrams Jeff Sukkasem -3-Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6JeffSukktlsem "~A~j0}~_ ~~ ~AI& f{;) (9n0.2JL Patricia B. O'Neill -4-Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6(301) 424-5777 Patrick Hoover Law Offices www.hooverlaw.com 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Practicing in Maryland & Washington, D.C. _ Of Counsel: David C. Gardner ~------------~-November 19, 2008 Judith S. Bresler, Esq. 10715 Charter Drive, Suite 200 Columbia, MD 21044 Re: JeffSukkasem 11,/21/94 Dear Judith Bresler, This letter is meant to bring to your attention that we have recently been hired by Jeff Sukkasem. He is a U.S. Citizen and resident of Montgomery County but was denied public school entitlement by his high school and the MCPS Board of Education on appeal. I would like to discuss the facts with you surrounding this fascinating legal case regarding our new young client. We intend to later supplement this letter with a legal authority memorandum to outline our client's position. Please let us know if there are any forms or fees to perfect our appeal for our client's denial of public school entitlement. Sincerely yours, PATRICK HOOVER LAW OFFICES ?t\M~.~~ Patrick J. Hoov PJHfcc Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6(301) 424-5777 Patrick Hoover' Fax: (301) 2'17-9297 ~':··maH: info@hooverlaw.com Law Offices www.hooverlaw.com 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Practicing in Maryland & Washington. D.C. _ Of Counsel: David C. Gardner ~------------~-November 19, 2008 Nancy S. Grasmick, Ph.D. Office of State Superintendent State Department of Education Nancy S. Grasmick State Education Building 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD 21201-2595 Re: JeffSukkasem 11..1 21/94 . Dear Nancy Grasmick, This letter is meant to bring to your attention that we have recently been hired by Jeff Sukkasem. He is a U.S. Citizen and resident of Montgomery County but was denied public school entitlement by his high school and the MCPS Board of Education on appeal. We were recently retained and are now taking over the case from previous counsel. We will be corresponding with Montgomery County Public Schools to get a copy of the file proceedings. This letter is to note our client's intention to attend public schooling as a Montgomery County resident. We intend to later supplement this letter with a legal authority memorandum to outline our client's position. Please let us know if there are any forms or fees to perfect our appeal for our client's denial of public school entitlement. Sincerely yours, PATRICK HOOVER LAW OFFICES ~~:~ PJHfcc CC: Judith S. Bresler Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Phone: (301) 424-5777 Fax: (301) 217-9297 E-mail: info@hooverlaw.com Web: www.hooverlaw.com Patrick Hoover Law Offices 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Practicing in Maryland & Washington, D.C. C Of Counsel: David C. Gardner November 21, 2008 James H. DeGraffenreidt, Jr., President Maryland State Board of Education State Department of Education 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD 21201-2595 Re: Appeal for client: leff Sukkasem 11121/94 Dear Mr. DeGraffenreidt: My office has recently been retained by a young man of 14, living for some time here in Montgomery County, Jeff Sukkasem. Jeff is a U.S. Citizen an(j legal resident of Montgomery County, yet he Was denied enrollment in his local public school by MCPS at all levels, including the Board appeal filed on his behalf through prior counsel. This unbelievable decision was made in spite of his being a resident in Montgomery County. Our young client has therefore been effectively denied the free public school education to which he is entitiled, for a period of several months at this point. This letter is to inform your office that we are noting our appeal to the State Board of Education and that we intend to supplement this letter with a following memorandum oflegal authority to outline our client's position at law and under the facts of the case. We will be also be corresponding with Montgomery County Public Schools to get a copy of our client's file proceedings, something I have been unable to accomplish despite repeated attempts to do so through prior counsel in the matter. Please let us know if there are any applicable deadlines, forms or fees to perfect our appeal from our client's denial of his public school educational entitlement. Sincerely yours, PATRICK HOOVER LAW OFFICES ?~~:~ Patrick J. Hoo~ PJH/cc CC: Judith S. Bresler Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Maryland State Board of Education 200 ST. PAUL PLACE I BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21202 I (410) 576-6465 January 12,2009 Patrick J. Il()u\er. J ':squire Patrick [IO\er L..l\\ OJ'iices 600 Jefferson Pia/.a. Suite 308 Rockville, MD 20852 Rc: Jeff'Sukkasem v. Montgomery County Board of Educalion Dear Mr. Iloover: I am writing on hehalf of th<: Maryland State Board or Education in response to your request for an appeal10 the State Board that was received hy n:gular mail on January 5, 2009. Pmcedun.:s of the Maryland Stat<...' Huard ulTducation require that a written appeal be forwarded tP the Slate Board of Education within 30 days or the local board's decision and include the rolhiwillg ini()rmation: the partics 10 the appeal; a copy or the decision from which an appeal is being taken irthe copy is available; and a statement of the facts and issues upon which the appea; is based. A copy ofCOM1\R 131\.01.05.01 which contains all the regulations concerning c1ppeals to the Slate Board of Education is enclosed. Your letter of appeal does not contain the required statement of the facts and issues upon which you base the appeal. Please provide the udditional information by Thursday, JanuaIY 22, 2009, or 3U days li'om the cblc urthe local hoard's dedsion, whichever is later. ! hope this inroll11ution is helpl'ul to you. Enclosun: c: State Board File .Iud\ Bresler. j·<.;quirc u:\s!\:\ l'l.A.C( )' \\ : I; ):\ : .\ ;\ I'!) I ',,,\! ,,1{ c\.j1'v1urdn )(1\\ukka:";"'\tl. 'j\ !-'d Sinccn:iy, J at'kic La Flandra Assistant Attorney General \1aryland State Department of Education Affirming Equal Opportunity in Principle and Practice Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Phone: (301) 424-5777 Fax: (301) 217-9297 E-mail: info@hooverlaw.com Web: www.hooverlaw.com Patrick Hoover Law Offices 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Practicing in Maryland & Washington, D.C. C Of Counsel: David C. Gardner January 30, 2009 Dr. Anita S. Mostow Montgomery County Public Schools 850 Hungerford Drive Rocbville, MD 20852 Re: My Client: Jeff Sul"basemj Age 14 Dear Dr. Mostow, SENT BY FAX, ENtAIL AND REGULAR POST I am writing to re-acquaint you with the basic facts of my 14 year old client, Jeff Sul"l"asem, and on his behalf, I once again ash that your office review the file in this case and reconsider Jeff's application to enroll in his local public school here in Montgomery County. The basic facts remain the same as those you may find in the file when originally investigated by your office, however, at this point, Jeff has been living continuously in Montgomery County with no interruption; he has received no support from his parents in Thailand and he has been not attended any school, public or private, in the nearly two years in which he has been living in our community, since he first sought tuition waiver and enrollment in MCPS. Your file will also reflect and you may recall that Jeff is a U.S. citizen living with his guardian in Montgomery County. I can provide affidavits of uninterrupted and continuous residence in the county, should this be necessary. Thanhfully Jeff's guardian is yet providing him with basic shelter and care, but for all intents and purposes, he been legally abandoned by his parents who remain in Thailand to my Imowledge and refuse to provide for the tuition required of your office for this young man. Therefore, the regulations asserted in the original application by MCPS requiring a showing of hardship, parental inability to care for my minor client, are at this point entirely inapposite in the case of Jeff Subhasem. As such, it is now high time for MCPS to move quicbly to do all that is necessary to complete what I'll call the re-investigation or other administrative red tape involved in mal"ing its speedy determination of tuition free public school eligibility. Plainly, no 14 year old, and certainly not this 14 year old, can be expected to provide MCPS with tuition absent help from a responsible adult. His guardian, who is a single wor]"ing mom with another child of her own, is entirely unable to provide the tuition required by your office, nor is she legally obligated to provide for private tuition for her ward. Jeff is literally a boy without a school, something very lil"e the better l"nown Man Without a Country written by Edward Everett Hale, in the Atlantic Monthly in 1863. I am available to speab with you or to meet with you, as is Iny client at your earliest opportunity. For the record, I spohe yesterday with the principle's staff at Cabin John Middle school, Jeff' 8 local 8chool, Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6and was once again told that I would have to contact your office for a determination of eligibility before my client would be allowed to attend school. I am in hopes that a further review of my client's enrollment request, now that it is plain he is not going away and I assert, the responsibility of MCPS to educate, just as MCPS does for so many other undocumented children living in our towns and communities, will at this time with the passage of years, be favorably considered. Jeff Sul<kasem has by now been living in Montgomery County continuously for almost two years time. It has been two years since he first applied for enrollment in MCPS. He has not returned to his parent's residence in Thailand; received support from his parents, nor has he been enrolled in any school since coming to live in Montgomery County. Surely, by this time MCPS will realize that for all intents and purposes Jeff has been legally abandoned by his parents and is now a bonafide resident child" grandfathered" into the posture of eligibility for free county public school enrollment. please reply at you earliest opportunity. Jeff will be turning 16 in another few months and he has no time to waste. Accordingly, I asl< that your office expedite this matter and proceed with all speed. PJHI cc CC: Judith Bresler Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6info@hooverlaw.com wININ.hooverlaw.com March 10, 2009 Patrick Hoover law 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Practicing in Maryland & Washington. D.C. C Of Counsel: David C. Gardner Dr. Anita S. Mostow Montgomery County Public Schools 850 Hungerford Drive Rockville, MD 20852 Re: My Client: JeffSukkasem; Age 14 Dear Dr. Mostow: I would like you to reconsider your decision regarding my client, JeffSukkasem, in his application to receive a tuition-free education in Montgomery County~ Maryland. Please contact me as soon as you are in receipt of this letter at my office phone number 301-424-5777. This request is made also on behalf of Jeff's guardian, Kanya AmornpimonkuI. I have no doubt that you will recall our lengthy telephone conference several weeks past in which I promised to pin down the issues of any frequent international travel to and from Thailand by my client, the question of any financial support made to provide help to JeffSukkasem and/or his guardian from any outside sources, including his parents, and lastly, the question of my client's and his guardian's ability, if any. to finance private school education for my young client. I am sorry it has taken me so long to respond, but I am now in the position to fully refute any suggestion that Jeff Sukkasem has engaged in frequent international traveL Furthermore, I am also in the position to refute the allegation that my client or his guardian has ever received financial support from any third party. Enclosed, please find the affidavit of Kanya AmornpimonkuI, who states, under the penalty of peIjury" that neither she nor her young ward, my client, has ever received financial support and that she is also unable to afford private education for my client. Finally, I also enclose a copy of Jeff Sukkasem's passport, in which it is clear that he has not travelled out of the United States, his home country, since September of2007, which is hardly the regular international travel to and from his parent's home that would certainly call into question his bona fides. Please contact me upon receipt of the enclosed documents. I will gladly show you the original passport proving my previous assertion. I expect a response in the near future as my young client has not been in school for far too long. Thank you for your consideration regarding this case and my client, Jeff Sukkasem. Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Sincerely yours, PATRICK HOOVER LAW OFFICES ~:~ Patrick J. Hoov PJHJ cc CC: JeffSukkasem Enclosure( s): Affidavit of Kanya Amompimonkul Copy of JeffSukkasem's Passport Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6AFFIDA VIT OF KA:'l'YA AMORNPIMONKUL 1, Kanya Amornpimonkul, a person over the age of eighteen, of sound mind and hav lng personal knowledge of the facts contained herein, state the following: I. My name is Kanya AmornpimonkuL J am a family friend and the legal guardian of fourteen year old Jeff Sukkasem as ordered by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland on the 21 st of April, 2008 . 2. I reside at .. ••••• " North Bethesda, IVID 20852. 3. JeffSukkasem is a United States Citizen, who was born and raised in the State of Caliiornia, by his natural parents, Oran and Sarita Sukkasem. 4. When he was approximately eight years old, Jeff and his family moved to Thailand. Jeff remained there until March 2007, when Jeff, alone, returned to the United States of America and settled in Montgomery County, Maryland, where he lived for a short time with the Johnsons. 5. JeffSukkasem no longer lives with his parents, Oran and Sarita Sukkasem, who are currently divorced and continue to live in Thailand. 6. Instead, as of September 2007, Jeff has been living in my home and under my care. Neither I, nor Jeff, have ever received any monetary support from either of his parents, or any other source. 7. Since his return to his home country, the United States, on September 2007, Jeff Sukkasem has been unable to attend school due to the denial by Montgomery County Public Schools, in regard to waive tuition in our report for Jeff's schooling. 8. Jeff Sukkasem has not left the United States of America, the State of Maryland, or Montgomery County since September 2007, except for some few and rare occurrences in which he travelled within the Metropolitan region. 9. Without a tuition waiver, neither I, nor Jeff, have the means to afford private education whcrc Jeff may continue his schooling. 10. Jeff Sukkasem is a permanent member of my home in Montgomery County with no financial ties to any other person will to care for his needs. I SOLEMNLY AFFIRM UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE CONTENTS OF THE FOREGOING AFFlDA VIT ARE TRUE. Date Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Patrick J. Hoover, Esq. Residency Compliance Office Montgomery County Public Schools 850 Hungerford Drive, Room 200 Rockville, Maryland 20850 (301) 315-2003 March 27, 2009 600 Jefferson Plaza, Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Re: JeffSukkasem Dear Mr. Hoover: This is in response to your letter dated March 10, 2009. As you are aware, your client was denied, by this office, a tuition waiver to attend a Montgomery County Public School. Your client has appealed this decision on two other levels, to the Chief Operating Officer and at the Montgomery County Board of Education. At both levels it was determined that in order to attend a Montgomery County Public School, Jeff would have to pay tuition. It is unfortunate that Jeff has not continued his education, but the documents that have been presented to date to our office do not qualify him for a tuition waiver. We will be happy to assist his guardian in finding a school that will accept him as a paying student if she so desires. Please contact me if you have any further questions about our procedures. Copy to: File Sincerely, (j,~j./h(e'1::t;.J' Anita S. Mostow, Ed.D. Rcsidency Compliance Unit _ 1 2009 Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6:}! _L": ::~'£: ':.\·:1.L>~,.'~~ .:.". J!~e,\·~c.1":· J~,.LG~,:J ~:_ V:,:."jx< .F~lCK Dr. Jen'Y "Vcas;: \iCPS Superintendent 0~D Hm:geriord Drive Rochilk.}"lD 20BSO DcaT Dr \\,'ci:st: I6TH LEGISLATIVE DlSTRICT MONTGOME.RY COlJNTY 'May 13, ::009 ''v Hi.:.~r ;;<:u"t. 0(;;,<, Building 11 Blade.1 :irr!tt. S',:re 2 E",; :\",;ap<'i"," :'\,br},a;rd 2)-;0: .tlC-8-41-3124· 301-8:;!)~~~'L~~:; BDG-o.192 .. i!21 r,:'\T. JL~'4 \'1.'-: han." recc:ved the enclosed email from Janis Sartucci regarding J .. S and enrollment in North Bethesda \!iddle School. WouJd you please look i)1io ~his matter and prnvlde us '''''ith a complete report. \\e p.ppre(.:iate your assistance 'Nith this constituent concern. Bes! regards Sincerely. -"'"'") /') 1 ~~tf£L ;#M ~~ Brian E. Frosh W'lIliam A. Bronrott \Viiliam Frick :\\-A B:CWF rSCLilcs Enciosllrc Document hosted at nv~~1'J http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Phone: (301) 424-5777 Fax: (301) 217-9297 E-mail: info@hooverlaw.com Web: www.hooverlaw.com Patrick Hoover Law Offices 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 Practicing in Maryland & Washington, D.C. c Of Counsel: David C. Gardner June 4,2009 Dr. Anita S. Mostow Montgomery County Public Schools 850 Hungerford Drive Rockville, MD 20852 Fax: 301-279-8549 Re: My Client: Jeff Sukkasem; Age 14 Dear Dr. Mostow: SENT VIA E-MAIL, FAX AND REGULAR MAIL It is clear to me at this point that we have come to an impasse about Jeff Sukkasem's eligibility for a tuition-free education in the Montgomery County Public Schools. While I will continue to pursue every avenue to obtain for my client the tuition-free education for which his guardian, like every other taxpayer in the county, has already paid, I appeal to you at this time to allow Jeff to enroll in school immediately and allow this tuition dispute to continue independent of Jeff's ability to gain an education. Indeed, his enrollment is required by Maryland state law and is supported by Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) Regulations. Section lILA. of the MCPS Regulations JEA-RB states as follows: All qualified students whose parents/guardians have bona fide residency within a school area must be accepted for enrollment unless excused from school attendance according to the provisions of Section 7-30 I (Compulsory Attendance Law) of the Annotated Code of Maryland or Section 7-305(d)(5) (denial of enrollment to a student who is currently expelled or suspended from another school system). Enrollment of students will be considered temporary until such time as the records show there has been no expulsion. According to MCPS Regulation JEA-RB, Section II.A., a "qualified student is defined as "a student 5 years old or older and under 21." "Bona fide residency" is established by a parent or guardian, according to Section ILF if the residence "is one's actual or true residence, maintained in good faith, and does not include a temporary residence or superficial residence established for convenience or for the purpose of free school attendance in the Montgomery County Schools." Clearly, Jeff is a qualified student, since he is 14 years of age. Just as clearly, Jeff's legal guardian, Kanya Amornpimonkul, has long established bona fide residency in Montgomery County, where her natural-born son attends Montgomery County Public Schools for that very reason. Therefore, Montgomery County Public Schools' own regulations require that Jeff, a resident of Montgomery County whose legal guardian is a bona fide resident of Montgomery County, attend the appropriate school in his area. Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6The MCPS Regulations are in keeping with state law regarding compulsory attendance. Specifically, the Annotated Code of Maryland, Education Article, Section 7-301 states that every child residing in Maryland shall attend a public school unless he is receiving his education from another source. As you know, Jeff Sukkasem has been residing in Montgomery County for nearly two full school years without receiving any formal schooling, either private or public. This exceptional 14 year old boy has been tutoring himself by spending his days in a public library, creating a situation directly contradicted by Maryland state law. His current legal guardian has now twice attempted to enroll Jeff in public school, but MCPS have prevented her from complying with state law by turning him away. State law requires Jeff's attendance in school, but the MCPS's actions have hindered him from getting an education. Finally, I would point out that whether or not Jeff is allowed to attend school, I will continue to insist that Jeff has the right to attend MCPS without paying tuition. If your office continues to deny Jeff a free education, I will again appeal to the Montgomery County School Board, arguing that Jeff, as a US citizen and legal ward of a Montgomery County resident, must be allowed this education. I am willing to appeal to the Maryland State Board of Education and will resort to court action ifnecessary to get this young man the education to which he has a right. This process has the potential of leaving Jeff unschooled for months and years to come if your office does not allow him to attend school immediately. Jeff's guardian, unsupported by Jeff's parents, does not have the means to educate him through private means, leaving Jeff to continue the solitary self-education he has been pursuing for the past two school years. He will continue to be not only a student without a school, but a symbol of a governmental bureaucracy too intransigent to make appropriate decisions for the benefit of the greater societal-and state constitutional -goal of providing an education for its residents. I once again ask you to reconsider your decision not to allow Jeff Sukkasem to attend his local Montgomery County Public School free of tuition. However, barring that, I ask you to allow Jeff to enroll in school immediately according to MCPS Regulations so that he can continue his education in earnest while the tuition dispute continues. Please contact me upon receipt of this letter so we can discuss enrollment procedures for Jeff. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely yours, PATRICK HOOVER LAW OFFICES ~~.~~ Patrick J. Hoov , PJH/sg CC: Jeff Sukkasem Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Jun 04 09 01 :01 p Patrick Hoover 301.217.9297 p.2 Statement from Legal Guardian of Jeff Sukkasem I am K~l1ya Amompimonkul, the legal guardian of Jeff Sukkasem. It is part of my job as guardian to ensure leff attends school and does not violate truancy laws. I live and pay taxes in Montgomery County. and I send my natural child to Montgomery County Public Schools. Because I am a resident of Montgomery County. I believe leffshould attend Montgomery County Public Schools tuition free, just as my son does. Jeff is a United States citizen, 14 years cf age. He is most fluent and comfortable in English. He was born in California and attended school there for most of his childhood. He has lived with me for nearly tvm years and is covered by my health insurance. Jeft's birth parents live in Thailand and do not contribute to his financial and physical wellbeing. Two years ago Jeff's parents sent him to the United States to live first with another guardian and then ·with me. They did this because they could not afford to care for him properly in Thailand and could not therefore ensure a proper upbringing and education there. Jeff's father is a police officer in Bangkok with a modest salary, and he is divorced from Jeff's mother, who cared for Jeff until he was sent back to the United States. She is currently unemployed and spending all her time and resources caring for a sick parent. Jef't's birth famUy'sfinancial situation, however. is irrelevant. They sent him to Maryland two years ago and will not or cannot pay for him to return to Thailand. Jeff has, for all intents and purposes, been abandoned into my care. \Vbilc Jeff's mother does contact him once or mice a week, she does not send money. Since the Montgomery County Public Schools have previously denied his reqnests to attend school tuition free in Montgomery County, and since I do net have money to pay tuition, Jeff has spent the past two school years attempting to educate himself in the local public library. He has few friends and has no meaningful way to meet other children his own age. He is isolated and frequently feels lonely. This situation has become a crisis for Jeff. Jeffhas for nearly two years been a resident of Maryland. He is a bright child and has previously shown promise as a student. I am. his guardian, a resident of Montgomery COtuIty, and I believe Jeff should be accorded the right to attend the tuition-free public ::in~~ Date b 1510 q \) NOmriZed __ ,~~f~~~~~~ __________ _ frttl C~;tl/t~~.., '<'-'<It' ; x, lu I; /£6 6 J..z c, MAGUETTE MAREME GROGAN NOTARY PUBLIC MONTGOMERY CO. MARYLAND Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6Phone: (301) 424-5777 Fax: (301) 217-9297 E-mail: Patrick Hoover Law Offices Phoover@hooverlaw,com Web: http://www, Hooverlaw,com 600 Jefferson Plaza Suite 308 Rockville, Maryland 20852 June 11, 2009 Mr. Larry Bowers Montgomery County Board of Education Chief Operating Officer 850 l1ungerford Drive Rocl~viJle, MD 20850 Re: Mv Client: Teff Sul~l~asemi Age 14 Dear Mr. Bowers: Practicing in Maryland & Washington, DC • Of Counsel: David C, Gardner SENT VIA REGuLAR MAIL The purpose of this letter is to note an appeal of Dr. Anita Mostow's recent decision regarding my client, Jeff Suld~asem. Dr. Mostow's office recently determined, upon referral from the International Students Admissions Office (ISAO), that Jeff should not be allowed to enroll at Bethesda Middle School or at any other school within the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) system. She made her recent decision despite the following facts: (1) Jeff's legal guardian, Kanya Amornpimonl~ul, is a bona fide resident of Montgomery County whose natural born son attends Montgomery County Public Schools; (2) Jeff is a US citizen whose natural parents live abroad and do not support him financially; and (3) Jeff has been compelled contrary to the Maryland truancy statute -to stay home from school for the past two school years and study on his own. Dr. Mostow has made it clear that she will not permit Jeff to enroll unless he first agrees to pay tuition. On Monday, May 18, Jeff and his legal guardian, Ms. _Amornpimonl~ul, attempted to enroll at Bethesda Middle School, providing all required documents. Jeff was told he would be enrolled pending placement exams, and he and his guardian were referred to the ISAO. This was ostensibly because Jeff has not attended school in the United States (nor in any other country, for that matter) in the past two years, mal~ing him an "international student" by MCPS's definition. The ISAO assigned Jeff an appointment to take the placement exams on Tuesday, May 26. When Jeff arrived on May 26, no tests were administered, and Jeff was not enrolled at that time. Instead, he and his guardian were told that his case would be referred to Residency Compliance Services (RCS). I then spoke to Dr. Mostow in that office, who indicated that Jeff would not be allowed to enroll or attend school tuition free. Since Jeff's legal guardian is a bona fide resident of Montgomery County, and since Jeff clearly has no other option for formal schooling, he should be permitted to attend MCPS on the same Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6tuition-free basis as any other resident of Montgomery County. Jeff is a United States Citizen, born and raised for most of his life in the United States. While Jeff spent approximately two years in school in Tllailand, wl1ere his natural parents currently live, he is clearly not an international student and should not be considered as such by the MCPS. In addition to being a US citizen, Jeff speal~s Huent Englisl~ and does not speak his natural parents'language Huently. Meanwhile, his legal guardian resides and pays taxes in Montgomery County, where her natural son attends school tuitionfree. Jeff's natural parents provide no financial support and have financially abandoned him to Ms. ".A..mornpimonkul's care. Ms. Amornpimonl~ul does not have the financial ability to pay tuition at MCPS or any private school, nor should she be required to, since she is a bona fide, taxpaying resident of Montgomery County. Because Jeff's natural parents do not support him and because his legal guardian cannot afford school tuition, Jeff has been forced to keep up with his studies during the past two school years by going to the public library and studying from whatever books he is able to find there. This is an unacceptable situation, especially given the Maryland statutory requirement that every child in the state must attend public school unless alternative provisions are made for an education from another source such as private school or home schooling. See Annotated Code 0/Maryland, Education Article, Section 7-301. Even if MCPS continues to dispute Jeff's residency, MCPS regulations and Maryland law require Jeff to attend school while the dispute is pending. Section IILA. of the MCPS I~egulations JEA-RB states as follows: All qualified students whose parents/guardians have bona fide residency within a school area must be accepted for enrollment unless excused from school attendance according to the provisions of Section 7-301 (Compulsory Attendance Law) of the Annotated Code of l\1aryland or Section 305(d)(5) (denial of enrollment to a student who is currently expelled or suspended from another school system). Enrollment of students will be considered temporary unLil such time as the records show there has been no expulsion. According to MCPS Regulation JEA-I~B, Section I1.A., a "qualified student is defined as "a student 5 years old or older and under 21." "Bona fide residency" is established by a parent or guardian, according to Section ILF if the residence "is one's actual or true residence, maintained in good faith, and does not include a temporary residence or superficial residence established for convenience or for the purpose of free school attendance in the Montgomery County Schools." Clearly, Jeff is a qualified student, since he is 14 years of age. Just as clearly, Jeff's legal guardian, Kanya Amornpimonkul, has long established bona fide residency in Montgomery County, where her natural-born son attends Montgomery County Public Schools for that very reason. Tl1erefore, Montgomery County Public Schools' own regulations require that Jeff, a resident of Montgomery County whose legal guardian is a bona fide resident of Montgomery County, attend the appropriate school in his area. The MCPS Regulations are in keeping with the state law regarding compulsory attendance, as cited above. Jeff Sukl:<asem has been residing in Montgomery County for nearly two full school years without receiving any formal schooling, either private or public. This remarl~able 14 year old boy has been tutoring himself by spending his days in a public library. His current legal guardian has diligently attempted to enroll Jeff in school, but MCPS have prevented her from complying with state Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6law hy turning him away. In short, state law requires Jeff's attendance in school, hut M CP Shave hlocked his required attendance. I have contacted your office to arrange a hearing regarding this matter. In the meantime, I request that you review the enclosed documents and allow my client to enroll in school immediately according to MCPS Regulation JEA-RB, Section IILA. as stated ahove. Jeff has heen out of school fOJ: too long and must he allowed to join his peers immediately. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely yours, PATRICK HOOVER LAW OFFICES ?~~. Patrick J. Hoover PJH/aca Document hosted at http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=3ac7ba67-8cea-4ee9-b97c-1e6664bfcbe6

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

- hide

Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.