~Sorin Cerin: „Love“

Does this mean that we, the people of this world that lost our Sacred Self and with it the Divine in us, moment upon which the Original Sin was born, we were destined to such a tragic end?

Once again my answer is yes. It is true, we were destined to such a tragic end and this end can NOT even be a lesson taught by the true God that is the Creator Factor and the Unique Accidental one.

This is not a lesson that the human beings could teach us, because it would mean that God is a creation of extreme Evil and made us, as a sadistic, in order to live a life of needs, anxieties and eventually absurd. I say absurd because no matter how much we believe when children that life is almost eternal, no matter how much we would live our lives as if we were eternal, we are nothing else but passing shadows of sufferance, in a passing world. Everything passes even what we wouldn’t want to, like our beloved ones, for instance, but they are passing too in this absurd world of sufferance.

If our existence here is not a bitter lesson God or the Creator Factor and Our Unique Accidental one taught us, what is it?

Can we know what this world is?

To find out what this world is, shall we have to know first who the God that made it is?

We shall have to find out what this world is and who the God that made it is. Once we solve this equation, we shall find out if the God that created this world is a sadistic or if he wants to taught us a lesson that we will never forget or if, quite the contrary, the fact that we see world this way is due merely to us and to our own choice that we have foolishly made, precisely because gave us the Free Will.

Despite all that, before we can reach the Free Will, we shall have to solve some other unknowns, as Will, because Will is one of the promoting principles of the Free Will of this world and I have written in other philosophical texts about the fact that Man not only can he not possess Will but he doesn’t even have Liber Arbitru in order to chose among his possibilities, but among his possibilities of obeying an exterior choice, I Say now here.

Subsequently, we are beings that belong to the Logical Coefficient 2, so we cannot find more that one opposed to Good, namely Evil, as to Evil we can only oppose Good.

This forces us from the beginning to limit ourselves to these possibilities that are accessible to us as human beings, but that we haven’t decided. If we only knew at least another opposite of Good except Evil our world would have another meaning thus becoming a different world from the one we feel, see and understand. Then even devils would have an opposite to them that wouldn’t be exclusively God, as the opposite of God wouldn’t consist of the Devil alone.

Once we orient towards the mainly co-axiological logic, we shall have to find out if our world is a lesson to us or a game of a reality independent of us and of the Creation.

For this we will have to see what Creation is.

Creation is one of the Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language, along with Matrix Words as Knowledge, Beginning, End and Origin and all of these five define the group of Matrix Words with attributive functions.

Concluding, the group of Matrix Words with attributive functions is formed only by the five Matrix Words.

The End will have as attribute Beginning, Beginning will have as attribute Origin, Origin will have as attribute Creation and Creation will have as attribute Knowledge, but this will be in fact the Mirror in which the Matrix Word of love will be reflected in order to create the Image of Creation, namely Destiny.

Why Love? Because Creation has knowledge for attribute, but Knowledge cannot fulfil its purpose as Mirror without a certain Matrix Word to be reflected in this Mirror, that is true knowledge and not the Image reflected by the Mirror, but only the Mirror itself.

Creation cannot be reflected into Knowledge because it would mean that Knowledge will reflect Creation and subsequently it will be known, which is impossible too, because it’s not the Mirror that Knows but its Image, and thus the result would be the Image of Creation.

This is impossible, because every Image is an Illusion and creation cannot be subject to a Destiny, along with this Illusion.

On the other hand, Destiny is the chain of the Accidental Occurrences that succeed only one Accidental Occurrence.

If Creation were this Accidental Occurrence, this would mean that everything that is created only existed once when Creation as Matrix Word meant the evolution of Everything, and of the pluralism in it including the infinity of worlds and realms, fact that cannot identify Creation as Matrix Word to a Unique Accidental Occurrence.

Moreover, an Image of Creation in the Mirror of Knowledge is in fact Non-Knowledge, as only the Image reflected by this Mirror is Knowledge, this would mean that Creation included could be subject to a Destiny that has an Image, or, even more that that, it would mean that it is fake, because Image is an Illusion and that Absolute Truth hides behind this Illusion as a Mirror of that Knowledge precisely or as Mirror that reflects Knowledge.

We cannot admit, under any circumstance the fact that Creation could be this Image of Knowledge because it would be fake and Creation cannot be fake.

For this, Creation determined as its attribute the Mirror of Knowledge that is its Absolute Truth or Non-Knowledge and also determined an attribute that can be owed to other functional characteristics of the Matrix Words too, along with the attributive and disjunctive functionality, namely a functionality that determines an extra attribute of Creation, besides Knowledge, thus defined as an incipient attribute, followed by the Love attribute, Matrix Word that is Our Creator Factor and Unique Accidental one and that left its trace in the Mirror of Knowledge, and all we see as Creation is nothing else than Love reflected into Knowledge. If we accept (though we don’t) that Our Creator Factor and Unique Accidental one isn’t Love, but an attribute of Creation that would be part of this Creation, even if we accept that the world that surrounds us is the Image of that Creation reflected in the Mirror of Knowledge, than it would mean that Creation too is an Intended Occurrence too, which cannot be true because if it were intended it wouldn’t exist anymore, it wouldn’t evolve and would hide behind a Destiny. Whereas Creation is neither an Accidental Occurrence, nor an Intended one, because it does not happen as Our Creator Factor and Unique Accidental one that arises as an attribute of creation along with the Mirror of Knowledge. On the other hand, the disjunctive functions of the Ubnique and Accidental one act for each Matrix Word and is does the same for the five Matrix Words of the attributive functions I have just mentioned. In this case, is the End Unique and Accidental, just as the Beginning, or as the Origin, or Creation?

In the philosophical sense and not only, the term and meaning of Accidental becomes similar to Knowledge only for those that come in contact with it. The sense of Accidental that the End implies, that attributively determines Beginning, as I have written in another work, is completely different Accidental compared to the one I speak of that appears in space-time interval, for instance.

This means that the accidental of the Beginning will not be a temporary “happening” and not one of something that by ending Begins, having an attribute in the Beginning, but it will first be an End with a shade of Infinite continuum, that defines itself through an eternal continuity, but without placing the definition of the Occurrence under the influence of the Unique and Accidental Infinite Continuum, but under that of the Uniqueness within diversity that cannot be neither Accidental nor Intended but only random.

The two Matrix Words with disjunctive functions of the Unique and Accidental one from the point of view of the Universal Pure Language define the Uniqueness of the whole Universal Pure Language that becomes Accidental only compared to the its Uniqueness, to what gives the Accidental one the Uniqueness status, thus reducing itself to this Uniqueness that is defined precisely though the other Matrix Word of Uniqueness.

This doesn’t mean that two Matrix Words can unite in case they both have the same meaning in reference to the Universal Pure Language because even if they have the same meaning in reference to this Universal Pure Language, they have different meanings when referenced to the structure of this Universal Pure Language, which offers them a random status that differentiates them depending on the signifiers they determine and to which they refer to. This confers them a different status to the two Matrix Words that interact, thus having a conjectural characteristic.

Beginning will have a certain signifier in reference to Uniqueness and to Occurrence as Creation, for instance, will have a completely different signifier. If Beginning that is Unique can reflect an Unique that has Begun, the same Beginning in reference to the Universal Pure Language, it will define a Matrix Word that eternally begins precisely though its Accidental Uniqueness, where both Matrix Words, the beginning and the Accidental have the same meaning and the Accidental Uniqueness of the Beginning doesn’t it mean the reverse of the medal, namely a continuous Non beginning that is the starting position in order to always begin?

It can be seen how changing the signifiers and signified objects’ positions are in the current state of co-axiology.

The same thing happens regarding Creation, where we cannot speak of a Unique and Accidental Creation unless it is referenced to the Image of Knowledge, but even then only through its second attribute that is the Matrix Word of Love.

It is very simple to explain why we cannot speak of a Unique and Accidental Creation, precisely because the Matrix Word of Creation is a Matrix Word in the infinity of Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language.

This can no longer give Creation the appearance of being Unique and Accidental not even if it refers to its self, nor to the rest of infinite Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language, because these too would imply that they have been created or determined or subject to a certain evolution.

It is as clear as possible that any signifier concerning evolution necessarily requires space and temporality or something similar that implies a certain phenomenon of this evolution and certain dialectic.

Not only is this not so, but in co-axiology evolution can have a form of significance of the signifiers of the infinite continuum or of the Pure Expression of the Universal Conscience.

Thus both evolution and the significances of the signifiers of each of them are random and can only be determined conjecturally.

It’s not for nothing that we named these determinations of the signifiers in question as universal forms of expression, because there we ignore Knowledge, even if hypothetically, and we try to place it in its position of Matrix Word of the Universal Pure Language but from another infinite set of such Words.

The Creation we consider Unique and Accidental is one of the Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language inside of which not only it isn’t Unique and Accidental anymore, but is included in the Infinite Continuum and in the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience formed by the expressions of the entire infinity of Matrix Words, and among these infinities of Expressions there is one that belongs to Creation.

Yet, the question that arises is why Creation appears in the contextual frame of the five Matrix Words with attributive functions under the disjunctive auspices of the Unique and Accidental?

The answer consists of the fact that through reference only to the functionality of the five Matrix Words and only in such a order, Creation really becomes unique compared to the End that thus determines a Beginning where this Unique Creation has its Origin, Creation that becomes Accidental NOT in reference to the Mirror of Knowledge that is Non-Knowledge, with its Absolute Truth, but compared to the Accidental Uniqueness of Love that reflects in the Mirror of Knowledge that is Non-Knowledge thus leading to the Image that reflects in this Mirror of Knowledge, image that will always have a precedent in the Accidental Uniqueness of Love that is Our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one, for which creation of which it is an attribute becomes absolutely Accidental and Unique.

I have remembered this Matrix Words because they eternally define out world in time and space. If we perceive the world through another Logical Coefficient, along with time and space there would also be other opposites of it.

Returning to the Matrix Words that I have just remembered, that are part of the Universal Pure Language forming a reference to the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience through the fact that the Universal Pure Language is made up of a infinity of Matrix Words that form in their reflection an Unitary Whole that is the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience. Only seeing through the Logical Coefficient 2 we perceive such a structure because through another Logical Coefficient alongside the Universal Pure Language, there are other forms resembling to this one that don’t define only the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience, centred on the axiom Everything is in Every ones and Everything is in the Whole that defines the relationship between the Universal Pure Language and the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience, but would be a completely different axiom with other factors that would define that axiom along with the Universal Pure Language and the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience.

In this case, we should admit that our limit of the Logical Coefficient 2 of our world allows us to see the world just as this Logical Coefficient 2 depicts it or in other words, just as much as we can see through the key hole of this Logical Coefficient 2.

Thus the Universal Pure Language is made up of an infinity of Matrix Words where each such Matrix Word is a Number in this infinity and each such a Number is an Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one! The meaning of Our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one, this is why we live in a world of Knowledge.

If knowledge disappeared from this world then the world would disappear with it too.

The animals, the plants that have sensing abilities and Knowledge abilities too belong to this world only if we reference them to us as such, but compared to other realities, namely the one they are the closest to they are not mere animals or plants, but completely different representations.

The “closest” Matrix Word by functionality criteria, so from the point of view of the function they underlie are, as I mentioned in other philosophical works: the Matrix Word End that determines the Matrix Word Beginning that determines on the same functional attributive coordinate the Matrix Word Origin, that precedes Creation that becomes the determinant of Knowledge.

These are the five Matrix Words of the attributive functions because each such Matrix Words has as an attribute the next Matrix Word.

These five Matrix Words that I have defined in my works as belonging to the attributive function are each subject to the disjunctive function of the Unique and of the Occurrence, thus every such Matrix Word is Unique and Accidental, but is a Unique and Accidental Factor as well, while compared to the infinity of our worlds, only Our Creating Factor is Unique and Accidental.

Why is the Creating Factor Unique and Accidental to the infinite worlds of Knowledge?

The answer consists of the fact that the creational attribute of the World of Creation is precisely Knowledge, and the disjunctive function confers to Knowledge, compared to Creation, the Unique characteristic of recognising Creation as Unique and Accidental. Despite that, does Our Creating Factor belong to other worlds or to other Universes besides our worlds and our Universe, one it is a Creator? My answer is a decided No, because our Creating Factor is the Unique and Accidental attribute of Creation through which this Creation makes Knowledge perfect and Knowledge is our world.

The Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one as an attribute of Creation, as Purpose of this Creation is the one through which Creation defines the infinite Worlds of Knowledge, being the only one through which Knowledge becomes only one Occurrence because of the disjunctive functions of the Unique and Accidental One, it is Knowledge in all its worlds and what this Unique Occurrence of Creation reflects regarding Knowledge that perpetuates continuously is Destiny, that no longer is either an Unique or Accidental, but an Intended Occurrence, so Destiny.

For more common understanding, the Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one represents Knowledge as a whole, being defined only through its Uniqueness that is thus the only Accidental One, so the Unique and true Knowledge defined through our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one.

All that is not Unique Occurrence in Knowledge is Destiny, because the Unique Occurrence is defined through the Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one.

May wonder why there is still Destiny as a type of Knowledge outside true Knowledge that is our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one?

My answer is this: Knowledge is characterized through reflection and mirroring by excellence, terms such as the “The Mirror of Knowledge” have been often mentioned in many of my works. Even if the Matrix Words reflect one into each other in an infinite interdependence, in fact, that refection cannot be what for we, people reflection means, namely: mirroring. Because our world is a world owed to the Matrix Word of Knowledge, we cannot see the interdependence of the other Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language any other way than as mirroring because this is how Knowledge can perceive it. Consequently, we cannot claim that the Matrix Words would mirror each other, but we cannot contradict it either. This is owed to the fact that once we live the Illusion of Life and we perceive the distorted image of the way God or the Unique and Accidental Primary Event are reflected in this world, we cannot claim this in not like this, nor say it is. What we can say is that we know it to be different. Despite all that, every Matrix Word of the Universal Pure Language is reflected in the other one because they are all One, one Universal Pure Expression as One are all, i.e. that Expression is the result of all the meanings of this infinity of Matrix Words. The ability of Creation of creating an image of itself that it continuously reflects created Destiny, which is not genuine Knowledge but its image.

Once the Unique Occurrence is known, its image is perpetuated in and through Knowledge thus becoming Destiny! This way, Destiny is Illusion being a virtual image of a Primary Event, image that reflects depending on the Logical Coefficient through which it is received. Thus, Destiny is a image of Knowledge, and the worlds that are in the realm of Destiny are not in the least real, but they are imaginary worlds, completely unreal, a game of the Illusion of Knowledge just as our world is, where this dream that is our own Life, which I have defined as Illusion of Life, is the most important.

All that happened and all that will happen in the Universe of our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one took place long before they real occurred. What we see as an historical development of the evolution of our world is nothing else than a pale image reflected by the quality of what Knowledge is, but it is also possible that it would be completely the opposite, because our image reflected in the mirror of Knowledge is reversed image, as a screw that looked at in a mirror threads in the other way. Would this mean that we see and do what we should not? Does it mean that the true world of the Logical Coefficient 2 is totally reversed compared to our world that is thus reflected because of the mirror of Knowledge?

No matter how much we would like to explain the fact that Knowledge is not based on reflection or mirroring we cannot do that. Creation appears as a product of Knowledge and of course, of our Destiny, that becomes finite as it is an Illusion. Anyway, there would not be Creation if we would look at it through other Matrix Words not because it is not a part of our destiny or our illusion, but, above all, because it cannot be the development or the product of a concept. Creation cannot be created through a dialectical process. Creation cannot be developed, nor subject to a evolution or involution scale. Creation can only be confirmed or infirmed by the Primary Event that appears as a lack of the Semantic.

I have often heard the term “phenomenon” addressed to Knowledge. Many speak of the phenomenon of Knowledge.

Is Knowledge truly a phenomenon?

First of all, we human beings cannot know what a phenomenon really is, nor if Knowledge can be a phenomenon because we do not know the Absolute Truth and consequently, we cannot accurately know this.

Through phenomenon we understand first of all an Event that has a Beginning or that can replace a certain Intervention. From this point of view, for us human beings Knowledge is a phenomenon because we Know through a Beginning or a space-time development.

If we did not recognise the existence of this world through the space-time development, could we still Know?

The answer consists only of the alternances we can associate to Knowledge, both divergent and convergent, but especially of the applications in the posts of which Knowledge can be a part.

Regarding our world and our way of perceiving Knowledge, I first used in my works the term “Semantic”, and meanings of this Semantic, that exists only if these meanings can be referenced to a benchmark that could define them.

I first named this benchmark the “lack” from “something” and I defined that “something” as the Meaning, so the Semantic.

This Lack from the Semantic, once referenced to it determined half of the lack, because the other half melted in the Semantic or the result of these two was both Lack and Semantic, term I called Periodic, the one that is half meaning of the Semantic, half Meaning of its Lack.
<!–
D([“mb”,”\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eThis Periodic or Partial, as I named it, is the one responsible of the Primary Event from the worlds of Knowledge and for the continual perpetuation of this Event, but, attention, its perpetuation determines its reflections in all the other Events that follow it, so none of it is Accidental, nor Unique, but they belong to Destiny, being the image infinitely reflected of the Primary Event. \u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eThis leads to defining the worlds of Knowledge as worlds of Images and not of the consistent reality of these images.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eOur Creating Factor has set its print on the Primary Event, as a functional attribute of Creation that defines Love. \u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eThis print Our Creating Factor left on the worlds of Knowledge or of the Matrix Word of Knowledge is called Love, being the one that determines Knowledge, as it will define in its turn its different worlds compared to those of Knowledge. \u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eWe see how Love, despite the fact that it becomes an attribute of Creation and it should become the fifth Matrix Word of the attributive functionally ones , is not like this leaving its place to Knowledge, that has the quality of being a result of the attributive functionality, and Love only that of print of this attributive functionality.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eAll this is owed to the fact that the worlds of Knowledge are imaginary, illusion worlds that reflect a certain illusion and not a matter of fact.\u003cspan\u003e \u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp style\u003d\”text-indent:0.5in;text-align:justify\”\u003e\u003cspan lang\u003d\”EN-GB\”\u003eThis image of Knowledge is determined with the help of Love that implicitly becomes a Matrix Word along with its own worlds and Universes, as well as Knowledge, except that Love has the quality of Primary Intervention, of Print of the Primary Event that will come after Knowledge. “,1]
);

//–>

This Periodic or Partial, as I named it, is the one responsible of the Primary Event from the worlds of Knowledge and for the continual perpetuation of this Event, but, attention, its perpetuation determines its reflections in all the other Events that follow it, so none of it is Accidental, nor Unique, but they belong to Destiny, being the image infinitely reflected of the Primary Event.

This leads to defining the worlds of Knowledge as worlds of Images and not of the consistent reality of these images.

Our Creating Factor has set its print on the Primary Event, as a functional attribute of Creation that defines Love.

This print Our Creating Factor left on the worlds of Knowledge or of the Matrix Word of Knowledge is called Love, being the one that determines Knowledge, as it will define in its turn its different worlds compared to those of Knowledge.

We see how Love, despite the fact that it becomes an attribute of Creation and it should become the fifth Matrix Word of the attributive functionally ones , is not like this leaving its place to Knowledge, that has the quality of being a result of the attributive functionality, and Love only that of print of this attributive functionality.

All this is owed to the fact that the worlds of Knowledge are imaginary, illusion worlds that reflect a certain illusion and not a matter of fact.

This image of Knowledge is determined with the help of Love that implicitly becomes a Matrix Word along with its own worlds and Universes, as well as Knowledge, except that Love has the quality of Primary Intervention, of Print of the Primary Event that will come after Knowledge. Love reflects in Knowledge as it is not in the least in its evident reality Knowledge.

Love is just like our Creating factor who’s creation consists of the print it leaves on the Primary Event, which is the Lack from Semantic, so from all the infinite possibilities that could have become a certain being, possibilities that would have never turned into it hadn’t been for this Lack in them that is the Print of the Primary Event, so of the Unique Occurrence that is the base of Knowledge. .

These qualities of Knowledge are also those who define the fact that the five Matrix Words with attributive functionality “stop” at this level of Knowledge and do not go “further” unless it is under the protection of other functionalities.

I have recalled the attributive functions of the Matrix Words, End, Beginning, Origin, Creation and Knowledge but also the disjunctive ones, namely Unique and Accidental.

Love, because of the disjunctive function of Creation is Unique and Accidental, but it cannot be a part of its attribute once it is replaced by Knowledge neither can it be an intermediary Matrix Word between Creation and Knowledge because Love does not determine Knowledge through its attributivity, as the attribute of Love is not Knowledge, but through its complement to the process of Knowledge, as the Print Love leaves is the one that is a part of the first print of the Matrix Words of Knowledge just like a game of puzzle, allowing the attributivity of Creation to remain at the imagistic level of Knowledge.

Thus, besides the Matrix Words with disjunctive and attributive functions we also have Matrix Words with complementary functions or all completely different functions, but all the Matrix Words possess the conjunctive function according to the analogy of Everything, through which they are a whole and a whole is everything.

The number of the functions of the Matrix Words is infinite, just as the number of Matrix Words is infinite.

Knowledge is nothing else than a Matrix Word that is based on Instinct. Despite that, Knowledge is a Matrix Word that is wrapped in the Matrix Word of Love, being in fact the mirroring of this Matrix Word of Love precisely because the evolution of Knowledge is made through the eternal Print of the Matrix Word of Love, based on which we continuously determine the Primary Event and with it a whole range of events that come after the Primary Event.

Shall we ever be able to admit that once our Creating Factor is Love, so it is represented by the Matrix Word of Love, it becomes the Beginning of this Primary Event, it implicitly becomes its End, and Beginning and End find themselves in Creation, but also in the Love that is a result of Creation, but not of its attributive function?

Consequently, the Primary Event determined or defined as the print of the Matrix Word of Love is at the Beginning of this Event as well as at its End which implies that Our Creating Factor that is Love becomes both the Beginning and the End of these infinite worlds of Knowledge, or better said, Love wraps the infinity of the worlds of Knowledge through the fact that it is at the Beginning and at the End, even if Beginning and End are eternal because of the Primary Event.

Knowledge is in the realm of Love because of its complementary function, which means that the Matrix Word of Knowledge is implicitly perceived by us as the image of the Matrix Word of Love but a mirrored image, so a reversed image or at least different if not distorted of the Matrix Word of Love into Knowledge. Thus the new world we live in shows itself to us.

Why of the Matrix Word of love and of another Matrix Word I have explained it in other of my works.

The Universal Pure Language is formed of an infinity os uche Matrix Words, where every part of it is Creating and Unique Factor, so an infinity of such Unique and Creating Factors where everyone of them develops its own infinity of worlds and Universes, where every such Creating and Unique Factor is itself one of the number of the infinity it fits in.

All the Matrix Words form the Universal Pure Language that has an Unique Expression of its Universal Conscience.

This Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience is not defined only by each Creating Factor and Unique Accidental on, but also by the forms of Universal Expression that belong to groups or associations of several Creating Factors and Unique Accidental ones, that can be combinations or other associative forms which determine a certain degree of awareness of the Expression form concerned, as any other awareness besides Knowledge achieves the meaning and definition as Forms of Universal Expression.

Take, for instance, Uniqueness or Logic. They both have a certain MEANING within Knowledge even when in the worlds where they are Matrix Words, their meanings are different, so Logic as Matrix Word has a completely different meaning from what we know of Logic, just as Uniqueness does.

This way we can look at a certain word from the point of view of Knowledge and from that of its status as Form of Universal Expression.

Moreover, this infinity of Matrix Words is defined within an Infinite Continuum, and the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience becomes an Unique Conscience of this Infinite Continuum, precisely because of the Asemiotic Phenomenon, term I first used within Coaxialism. Why have I named it Coaxialism and not some other way? It is because any means through which we can conceive the world is coaxial, but also everything we know about the world, its phenomenon or characteristics as well as on that can be inside and outside this world, subjective or objective is nothing else but coaxial. We know the world through the Logical Coefficient 2 but we cannot deny the fact that the world can also be known through other Logical Coefficients but not by us. All these Logical Coefficients become coaxial through their own infinite number, coaxial to an infinite where they are all One, as one is in all. There will be more axis of Knowledge, in this case that will eventually unite through infinity, becoming coaxial. And the Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language are also coaxial through their reference to infinity, because there is an infinity of such Matrix Words, that infinity that describes the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience. Even the most distant frontier of my philosophy determined by the Intangible Forms that are beyond Everything, beyond anything we could imagine, not only as a concept, phenomenon or thing, but as a possible intervention, through hazard or Occurrence, they are coaxial to the development of hazard and Occurrence, to the events that happen through the infinity of the Matrix Words. How are the Intangible Forms coaxial to all of this? Through their mere reference to this coaxial axis. Yes, but a simple reference to a coaxial axis of the Intangible Forms doesn’t mean that they are coaxial themselves, some will say. Even if they are not coaxial themselves, they become it by reference, by changing the meaning or the Asymptotism in Tangentiality and vice versa, precisely because of the references. Such a reference is made on several axis of which many are coaxial themselves, and even the fact that we would consider the coaxiality of a coaxial axis as axiality, any reference and infinite congruence determines the coaxiality of any axiality.

The Asemiotic Phenomenon is defined, but not exclusively, as an opposite of the term of Semiotics that was defined as a mixture of pragmatics, semantics and syntax.

Semiotics cannot be plausible for a coaxiological solution because it is focused on the relations man-sign, signs-significant, which is not in the least true because the Semantics of Semiotics can achieve a meaning, precisely through the Lack of a part of itself that determines the partial or the periodicity and implicitly the reference to the title of Understood and partially Not understood, etc.

All these prove the fact that we cannot accept that everything reduces to the meaning of man, not the fact the signs were always in sight, and they were neither created nor determined, but they would have existed eternally, being that true as to give us that Knowledge of them and we, humans, would Know the Absolute Truth. This is not the case.

The signs are nothing else than arbitrary stakes through which we human try to define ourselves based on our Logical Coefficient 2 and thus identify the world we are in and that we form, as we neither knew this world, nor would it exist, because the world cannot exist independently from us, as we cannot exist independently of our world.

Thus, Semiotics is long outdated and according to Coaxialism, its place is taken by Asemiotics, that is not merely an opposite as the Logical Coefficient 2 of Semiotics, but wants to be more that that, an structuring of ideas that could generalise not only a infinite range of opposites of current Semiotics, but also a whole vision of the structuring of these opposites according to certain functional and structural characteristics of the opposites.

Thus Asemiotics includes more realms and asemitoical determinants than the ones I have so largely described in Antichrist, Being and Love.

What I would like to underline in this work is the inherence of the existence, of the Asemiotical Phenomenon to which the convergence and divergence that takes place between the Infinite Continuum and the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience is owed.

This Asemiotical Phenomenon is precisely interdependence, the way it connects relations, between the Infinite Continuum and the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience, because the Asemiotical Phenomenon protects the functionalities of both of them ths creating a causal connection between the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience and the Infinite Continuum that can determine itself only this way and generate one another, namely Everything in Every ones and Every ones into the Whole.

In the Coaxiological Logic I asserted that the Asemiotical Phenomenon is defined by the Asemiotical Function based on the Suggestive-Distributive Convergent and on the Suggestive-Distributive Divergent that defines in its turn the functionality of the Logical Function that consists of Non-intervention.

The characteristic of the Asemiotical Phenomenon is determined by its functionality, namely the asemiotical function, fact that proves that precisely the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience and the Infinite Continuum interact determining each other, through the Assemiotical Function that characterizes the Asemiotical Phenomenon that defines the functionality of the Logical function.

The Logical Function is determinant of the Asymptotism of the Intangible Forms, structuralized on Intervention and Non-intervention, precisely with the help of the Logical Function through the convergence and divergence of the Asemiotical Phenomenon on the Infinite Continuum and implicitly on the Unique Expression of the Universal Pure Conscience.

The Intangible Forms are somewhere above the functionalities, but their intervention, acknowledged through their mere presence, even though the term of presence is incorrect because it implies existence, when we cannot speak of existence at that level because even existence is a Matrix Word from the Infinity of Matrix Words of the Infinite Continuum that our world of Knowledge perceives as a presence, while Existence could not be a presence in its genuine reality, but something completely different.

Because of that, Coaxialism has the task of defining and determining through its application a value or non-value system, of new values or of a completely different nature on the relation between Knowledge, related through the Logical Coefficient 2 of man, that that is related through other superior Logical Coefficients and through other stages that surpass the Logical Coefficients and Knowledge related by the Matrix Word of Knowledge or the Forms of Matrix Expression.

Only this way can Coaxialism approach structures and systems of the infinite Universes within us and outside us.

This us that emphasizes the inside and outside is only valid for the human beings that think and understand this world based on the Logical Coefficient 2, because if understanding the existence of this world based on another superior Logical Coefficient, both the inside and the inside would be differently defined as beside these two opposites others would exist depending on the number of the Logical Coefficient concerned.

This is why what we know of religion is nothing else than an image as mistaken as the one we have on the world that surrounds us.

Coaxialism tries to make applications as closest as possible to what the religious essence should be, but also the human religion according to certain application without claiming for any reason that what it advocates through its applications is the Right Path or that it would discover who exactly God is and what the right religion that should be followed is.

Coaxialism, just as its auxiliary, the Logical Function, of which coaxiological Logic can tell more, or the Asemiotical Phenomenon, how many denominations as these one are made as a scaffold that helps the mason work suspended near a wall.

Coaxialism wants to know this wall of the great Universes that surround us without ever claiming that they speak the truth in one way or another, because Coaxialism also claims that Man can never know neither the Absolute Truth nor the Absolute Knowledge because he lives the dream of its own Illusion of Life.

Coaxialism does nothing else than renovating in one way or another that wall of Non Knowledge around man, but he does not renovate with true Knowledge or with reality, but emphasizes what real Knowledge is compared to the dream of Non Knowledge and of the Illusion of Life in the world we live in.

To speak of saints or demons, of Good or Evil in this world is just like sayng that one knows at leas the smallest and the most insignificant truth about the world it lives in or about one’s own existence.

Many are those to whom this life seems true, and to others is seems false. If they all want to believe in biblical stories or of any other nature they can do it. Human nature is predisposed to fiction. This is how we see such a nature. Do we really know what fiction is?

Why was I born here?

It was only to die here?

This was God’s Will, most people will say, understanding through it Destiny’s Will.

Maybe this answer is one of the closest to coaxiological truth and not in the least to Absolute Truth to which no one, among people, ever had or will have access as long as Man will exist!

We were born here because of Destiny that is probably, a reversed image of what we really are, that is the one before us, because we are always before us precisely due to the image of Destiny and to the fact that the Occurrence is us and we exist here, even through the dream the Illusion of Life gave us, this is owed to the fact that this image of Occurrence that we are was created by the true Occurrence that we brought us into being, and that Occurrence is Unique and Uniquely Accidental, and it is precisely through this Unique and Accidental Occurrence we become a part of Divinity, being one and the same with our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental One.

We are One in the Whole and Whole in One.

We leave in a world with Destiny, a world where everything that happens is just an image of what happened only once!

Because all that happens after the Unique Occurrence through which the Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one defines itself is a Intended Occurrence precisely because it has precedent and any Intended Occurrence is the image of the Unique Primary Occurrence reflected in one of the words of the Universal Language, and this image is Destiny. Our God is such a word of the Universal Language. Every word of the Universal language is Unique and Accidental. Only the words of the Universal Language can be like this. These reflect each other determining Destiny of the Intended Occurrences. Even Destiny with the meaning we know can be a Matrix Word of the Universal Pure Language. The difference is that not what destiny represents the way we know that can be a Matrix Word, but what it defines in its situation as Unique and Primary Event compared to all the other Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language, just as all the other Matrix Words of the Universal Pure Language are Unique and Accidental Events for each of all the others. Thus Destiny is perceived as destiny by our knowledge in this world of knowledge based on the bivalent logic, or the perception of the Matrix Word Destiny by the Matrix Word Knowledge, respectively of the bivalent logic is what we know about Destiny, but this is merely the perception of that Matrix Word and not what it really means neither in its own Self nor in reference to other Matrix Words. Even the Matrix Word of Knowledge, compared to other Matrix Words, means something completely different than what we know to be Knowledge, just as Knowledge in its own Self of Matrix Word has a completely different meaning. The fact that the Matrix Word Destiny seems thus to be known to us, and in fact it means something different is owed to the incidence of the Primary Event of our own Matrix Word that is our God, Primary Event that thus reflects in what we know the Matrix Word of Knowledge is, and this reflection is under the incidence of what we know about Destiny and thus defines the Matrix Word Destiny perceived through this incidence by our bivalent Logic.

Our God is the word of the Universal Language called Love, because when true Knowledge is missing we don’t have will either, and what remains from the three components of our conscience that are the cognitive, the volitive and the affective? Is it not only affectivity, love? God is Love because we are love? Why don’t we know? Because Man will never know neither Absolute Truth nor Absolute Knowledge, and any other truth cannot reflect Knowledge because it will be a lie. We cannot speak of pieces of Absolute Truth that would be revealed to us partially, because any fragmentation of the Absolute Truth is a Truth different from it, another Truth.

Any Occurrence that has a precedent cannot be a new Occurrence, no matter how different it would seem compared to the first Occurrence or to the Primary Occurrence through which our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one is defined.

Why can it not be an Unique Occurrence again if it is an Occurrence compared to the Primary Occurrence through which the Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one would be defined?

This is owed to the fact that any Occurrence even if it seems different in content compared to a preceding Occurrence, cannot be a Unique Occurrence, because as Occurrence it was preceded by the Primary Occurrence that is Unique. So it cannot be unique from the point of view of its status.

Once it is not unique from the point of view of its status, namely the Occurrence status, it cannot be Unique neither from the point of view of its content, because that content too is an Occurrence as it is an Accidental content.

The fact that the content as such is Accidental means that its occurrence is not accidental, because from the point of view of its status the Occurrence that reflects the content cannot be Occurrence, because it had a precedent in another Occurrence, namely the Primary Occurrence that is in fact the Unique Accidental Occurrence.

Thus, content too will receive the characteristics of the Occurrence, as a Intended Occurrence.

Being an Intended Occurrence, it will automatically become the Image of the Primary Occurrence, the Unique Accidental Occurrence of our Creating Factor and Unique Accidental one.

By becoming this image, it means that the content I was speaking of is nothing else that a DESTINY!

Mihai Eminescu: „The Dacian’s Prayer“

When death did not exist, not yet eternity,
Before the seed of life had first set living free,
When yesterday was nothing, and time had not begun,
And one included all things, and all was less than one,
When sun and moon and sky, the stars, the spinning earth
Were still part of the things that had not come to birth,
And You quite lonely stood... I ask myself with awe,
Who is this mighty God we bow ourselves before.

Ere yet Gods existed already He was God
And out of endless water with fire the lightning shed;
He gave the Gods their reason, and joy to earth did bring,
He brought to man forgiveness, and set salvation's spring.
Lift up your hearts in worship, a song of praise enfreeing,
He is the death of dying, the primal birth of being. >>>>>