I was hoping for some help, I was referred to this article which has been presented to me as a source proving the gas chambers.I am skeptical, as always I will read this article thoroughly and ponder. Perhaps someone here could shine some extra light on it for me. Thanks! http://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-hist ... port.shtml

It's debunked in this thread, enter Cracow above in 'search this topic'.

You cannot allow the discomfort created by conditioning to guide your analyses. As with all the other forms of crimespeak, you must engage it, preferably in public, you will get used to it. First it will be hard, but with time it will get easier (it is also great fun to watch the indoctrinated respond). Somebody needs to be the first one to scream “the emperor has no clothes“. Then, once one person does it, the others realize that it is safe and more follow. The key thing here is not to allow ideological “sacred cows” to roam around your intellectual mindspace and limit you in your thinking.

Yes, I have seen 'The Chemistry of Auschwitz' several times, and am familiar with the '....reports'. I quickly scanned the article that was given, and I noticed a few names and a few charts from memory; figured honestly it would be an easy target. Thanks for the help and effort, much appreciated.

Thanks for this information. I was trying to discuss this issue on Facebook, putting on a few movies from David Irving from you tube, just to promote discussion. I was unceremoniously kicked out of FB. So I thought I would come here.

The great advantage about telling the truth is that nobody ever believes it

NSDAP wrote:Thanks for this information. I was trying to discuss this issue on Facebook, putting on a few movies from David Irving from you tube, just to promote discussion. I was unceremoniously kicked out of FB. So I thought I would come here.

Hello there.Yes, that is what the aptly described "usual enemies of free speech" do when they know their unsustainable beliefs will be exposed in debate.If the facts actually supported their curious beliefs there would be no reason for censorship, debate would then be welcomed.

Certainly the 'Nazi gas chambers' scenario is a great place to start when examining the harebrained "Holocaust".The complete inability of these alleged mass murder weapons to do what the mythology states means 'game over'.B.

Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.

- The massive numbers of so called "survivor$" are living testimony to the fraudulence of the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers'.- The mere fact that there are endless "survivors" when it's claimed that 'the Germans tried to kill every Jew they could get their hands on' blows away the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers'.- If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask Revisionists such dumb questions like "so then, what happened to them?"