Merger Camps Making Push in Home Stretch

As next month's historic merger vote nears, the leaders of the
National Education Association are making an all-out effort to persuade
their members to vote in favor of uniting with the American Federation
of Teachers--at the same time that NEA members who oppose a merger are
coordinating efforts to defeat it.

With so much interest in the upcoming vote, Bob Chase, the president
of the NEA, held a press briefing here last week to discuss the voting
process and the "principles of unity" that would govern the creation of
what is being called the United Organization.

Critics of the merger framework, meanwhile, are trying to drum up
support for an alternative resolution should delegates defeat the
principles.

Delegates to both unions' national conventions, to be held in New
Orleans, must approve the principles by two-thirds majorities for talks
on a constitution and bylaws to proceed.

Mr. Chase said merger supporters don't yet have the votes they need,
but neither do merger critics."We are confident that we will in fact
get that two-thirds vote," he said. "We are working hard at it."

The board of directors of the 256,000-member California Teachers
Association has endorsed the principles, Mr. Chase said. The CTA's
support is considered key, because California represents 12 percent of
the NEA's total membership.

Territorial Turbulence

But the national leadership's efforts are being clouded by a
controversy in Puerto Rico, touched off by the recent passage of a
collective bargaining law in the U.S. commonwealth.

The Federacion de Maestros de Puerto Rico, the 9,600-member AFT
state affiliate on the island, circulated cards to school employees
asking them to designate it as the exclusive representative of
education workers, according to the NEA.

The challenge to the 22,000-member Asociacion de Maestros de Puerto
Rico, an NEA affiliate, came at a sensitive time. The teachers' unions
operated under a "national no-raid agreement" from Jan. 1, 1997, to the
end of last month. It was meant to discourage such challenges, once a
routine feature of teacher unionism, in states with collective
bargaining.

But the agreement did not apply to Puerto Rico or
non-collective-bargaining states in cases where no one organization had
been designated to represent teachers, union officials say.

"We don't believe that the difficulties existing right now are in
anyone's interests," Mr. Chase said of the situation in Puerto Rico. He
added that the NEA affiliate there also has been active in trying to
gain representation rights.

The two national unions plan to send a team to Puerto Rico to try to
smooth over the dispute.

"There are accusations back and forth both ways," Sandra Feldman,
the president of the AFT, said in an interview last week. "This is
exactly the kind of conflict we're trying to avoid with the
merger."

Up or Down

Mr. Chase and other NEA officers have been traveling the country
this spring to answer members' questions about the principles. The AFT
has not followed suit.

Negotiating teams spent "literally thousands of hours in the last
four to five years" to reach the principles, Mr. Chase said. The unions
have moved "closer together from a philosophical perspective" in that
time, he added.

An NEA-AFT Joint Council, created last fall, is working on issues of
teacher quality, school infrastructure, and safety and discipline. The
unions plan to hold a conference here Sept. 25-27 on teacher quality,
for example.

To spread the word about the principles of unity, the NEA has
prepared a six-page flier that includes a chart showing current NEA and
AFT policies and how they would be handled in the United Organization.
The flier will be included in the packets given to the 11,000 delegates
to the union's Representative Assembly when it convenes next month.

After debate July 4, the NEA delegates will vote yes or no on the
principles of unity the next day. They cannot be amended from the floor
or voted on separately.

The NEA also has a World Wide Web site on unity-- www.nea.org/unity --that includes
questions and answers and a discussion area where members are posting
their reactions. An NEA Unity Information Center responds to questions
from delegates or members about the principles.

Gutting the NEA?

In the other camp, elected NEA officials have met twice to
coordinate strategy to try to defeat the principles of unity. They
include state presidents from Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, and
New Jersey, along with the president of the Buffalo Teachers
Federation, the biggest NEA local in New York state. New York is the
only state where the NEA's presence is overshadowed at the state level
by the AFT.

Robert Haisman, the president of the Illinois Education Association,
has submitted a "new business item" for consideration at the NEA's
Representative Assembly should the vote on unity fail, according to
Philip Rumore, the president of the Buffalo union.

The item calls for the unions to establish a permanent no-raid
agreement and joint committees to work on issues of common interest,
stopping short of a merger.

Mr. Rumore has circulated a paper outlining the dissenters'
objections to the principles among state leaders, members of the NEA
board, and the local affiliates that belong to the National Council of
Urban Education Associations, a caucus within the NEA.

While supportive of the concept of merger, Mr. Rumore said the
principles of unity include compromises on core issues--such as voting
procedures and governance arrangements--that would "completely gut" the
NEA.

"This is David versus Goliath," he said of efforts to defeat the
principles of unity. "The whole leadership of the NEA and their finest
PR people are lining up to shove this thing down our throats."

Read a statement made Feb. 11,
1998, by Bob Chase, president of the National Education Association, at
the National Press Club on the first anniversary of the launch of his
"new unionism" initiative.

Read a January 1998 joint statement, "Teacher Unions Report
Substantial Progress Toward Merger," from either the AFT or the NEA.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.