I saw some softare a while ago that supposedly analyzed the previous drawings and the algorithm used but can't find it now.

Anyone know of such a system?

Thanks

Analyzing the Previous Drawing no Problem .. Any good software from Lotto Pro to Gail Howards " Smart Luck " can due that for You ..But , a software that can find the right algorithm ?? Never heard or seen such a Software !! Good Luck in your Search ..

Analyze enough previous drawings and put all those results together and you've got an algorithm. Then if it produce a winning combination in a group of combinations small enough that you can afford to play them all then you've got something.

* you don't need more tickets, just the right ticket * * your best chance at winning a lottery jackpot is to buy a ticket * "I will magically reveal the winning numbers after the drawing"

Defunct E.O.L. (Entertainment On Line) Lottery Tracker and Wheeler used Cumastat to review about 8 prediction methods to determine the weight of each toward the next draw. Not only didn't it work very well, if you deleted the last draw and tested the strongest recommended methods they failed to predict the winning numbers within a sizeable reduced field.

There was another program, also defunct that tested the last draw against thousands of simple predictions methods like one up from the previous draw, the top ten winning systems for the previous draw generally failed to provide winning numbers unless you played so many it was pointless. In back testing the program could always find a system that would have won, problem was that system never won in the next draw as far as my testing could tell.

hello,meskhov,past performancehas no impact onanything for thefuture,because of therandomnessof the game, youcanconfidently predictonly a partof the resultThe repetition ofakeyevent isthe probability, but the totalcontrol is impossibleDue to the largenumber ofconbinaçoes,mathematicswill always be60%and 40%randomVaryingthis percentage,

Defunct E.O.L. (Entertainment On Line) Lottery Tracker and Wheeler used Cumastat to review about 8 prediction methods to determine the weight of each toward the next draw. Not only didn't it work very well, if you deleted the last draw and tested the strongest recommended methods they failed to predict the winning numbers within a sizeable reduced field.

There was another program, also defunct that tested the last draw against thousands of simple predictions methods like one up from the previous draw, the top ten winning systems for the previous draw generally failed to provide winning numbers unless you played so many it was pointless. In back testing the program could always find a system that would have won, problem was that system never won in the next draw as far as my testing could tell.

BobP

Not only didn't it work very well, if you deleted the last draw and tested the strongest recommended methods they failed to predict the winning numbers within a sizeable reduced field.

garbage-ware.

In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

Defunct E.O.L. (Entertainment On Line) Lottery Tracker and Wheeler used Cumastat to review about 8 prediction methods to determine the weight of each toward the next draw. Not only didn't it work very well, if you deleted the last draw and tested the strongest recommended methods they failed to predict the winning numbers within a sizeable reduced field.

There was another program, also defunct that tested the last draw against thousands of simple predictions methods like one up from the previous draw, the top ten winning systems for the previous draw generally failed to provide winning numbers unless you played so many it was pointless. In back testing the program could always find a system that would have won, problem was that system never won in the next draw as far as my testing could tell.

BobP

they failed to predict the winning numbers within a sizeable reduced field.

That seems to be a fault in most prediction software even when they point a player in the right direction.

For example in the last MM drawing the lowest number in the winning combination was #1 and it was in the first position of the sorted combination. Most prediction software would probably predict the lowest and first number in tonight's sorted winning combination will be higher than #1 since of the 55 times that #1 was in the previous 711 winning combinations after the last matrix change was only followed by itself five times and the rest of the times was followed by numbers in the range of 2-29 with #2 being the most popular. The range of 2-29 is not a manageable field size for players playing only a few lines and while the most popular numbers often repeat, they do so less than 50% of the time. As you can see this type of analysis isn't very helpful to the average player.

* you don't need more tickets, just the right ticket * * your best chance at winning a lottery jackpot is to buy a ticket * "I will magically reveal the winning numbers after the drawing"

they failed to predict the winning numbers within a sizeable reduced field.

That seems to be a fault in most prediction software even when they point a player in the right direction.

For example in the last MM drawing the lowest number in the winning combination was #1 and it was in the first position of the sorted combination. Most prediction software would probably predict the lowest and first number in tonight's sorted winning combination will be higher than #1 since of the 55 times that #1 was in the previous 711 winning combinations after the last matrix change was only followed by itself five times and the rest of the times was followed by numbers in the range of 2-29 with #2 being the most popular. The range of 2-29 is not a manageable field size for players playing only a few lines and while the most popular numbers often repeat, they do so less than 50% of the time. As you can see this type of analysis isn't very helpful to the average player.

As predicted, the first and lowest number was between 2 and 29, but the field was so wide knowing that didn't help much.

* you don't need more tickets, just the right ticket * * your best chance at winning a lottery jackpot is to buy a ticket * "I will magically reveal the winning numbers after the drawing"

However it doesn't use algorithms with the traditional means everyone here will jump in and say they don't work. Traditional algorithms indeed do not work because they attempt to tackle the prediction problem with elementary approaches such as hot/cold/due, delay patterns, statistics, AI or whatever. Also of course numbers do not have memory and prediction does not work under the concept of numbers having memory and this is the reason the above methods do not work and the belief it is impossible to make a prediction; they rely on numbers having memory for these approaches to work! I have already users who have won good money using this system, one particularly over the last 10 draws, he has won 4 4-hits and 2 5-hits in his 6/49 game (he plays a wheel of 12 numbers) and he is of course very excited with that performance. As you can see, there is a big distribution of opinions regarding if lotto draws can be predicted or not. Myself I say they can be predicted up to an extend and the reason I developed GAT Engine, my proof is the regular wins observed by my users. If you ask these users, their opinion is it can be predicted only if you have the right mechanism to do so. Others who try to approach the subject via hot/cold/due, statistics, AI etc will say it can't be predicted because they attempt to analyse properties that aren't in the lotto draws in first place.