In Depth

In a case of first impression involving a mother who ingested rat poison in an attempt to kill herself and her unborn child,
one Indiana Court of Appeals judge felt that if the feticide statute is applied to women’s prenatal conduct, it might
lead to a “slippery slope” in which a full range of a woman’s conduct while pregnant could fall under the
feticide statute.

Bei Bei Shuai got pregnant during an affair with a married man, and when he ended their relationship, she decided to ingest
rat poison to kill herself and her 33-week-old fetus. Both she and the fetus originally survived, but the baby had to be delivered
by emergency C-section and died days later. The coroner concluded that A.S. died of “intracerebral hemorrhage due to
maternal Coumadin ingestion.” Coumadin is a variant of an ingredient found in rat poison.

The state charged Shuai with felony murder and Class B felony attempted feticide. Shuai’s request for bail was denied,
as was her motion to dismiss. Whether or not the murder and feticide statutes can be applied to a woman in this situation
is one of first impression.

The appellate court unanimously agreed in Bei Bei Shuai v. State of Indiana, No. 49A02-1106-CR-486, that the trial court erred in denying
Shuai’s request for bail. While evidence was presented to show she ingested rat poison with the intent to kill herself
and her child, Shuai also presented evidence to support alternate explanations for the hemorrhage that led to A.S.’s
death. The COA remanded for a determination of bail.

The judges split with regards to dismissing the charges against Shuai. The charging information said Shuai, on Dec. 23, 2010,
knowingly killed her fetus that had attained viability when she ingested the rat poison and caused A.S. to be born in distress
and subsequently die. Shuai claimed A.S. didn’t die on Dec. 23 because she was born alive and died on Jan. 3. When she
died, she was no longer a fetus and now a human being.

The state argued that even though A.S.’s birth changed her from a “viable fetus” to a “human being,”
it was Shuai’s actions that caused her death and the date she took the rat poison doesn’t matter.

The majority held that the charging information isn’t defective and that the feticide is not ambiguous as applied here.
The plain language of the statute encompasses Shuai’s alleged actions and she doesn’t have immunity from prosecution.

Judge Patricia Riley dissented because she believed the charges should be dismissed. The facts show that on Dec. 23, Shuai
didn’t kill a viable fetus, and the state didn’t provide evidence that Shuai did anything to endanger A.S. after
her birth. She disagreed with the state’s contention that the categories of “viable fetus” and “another
human being” as defined in the murder statute, can be used interchangeably with the focus on Shuai’s actions,
not A.S.’s legal status.

“By arguing that A.S.’s legal status as a viable fetus and as a human being are interchangeable, the State disregards
legislative reality and impermissibly attempts to enlarge the murder statute,” she wrote. “In light of Indiana's
long-standing statutory and case law history, I conclude that it was never the intention of the legislature that the feticide
statute should be used to criminalize prenatal conduct of a pregnant woman. Rather, the statute should only be applied to
third-party conduct which endangers or harms a non-viable fetus.”

Conversations

0 Comments

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or
hateful.

You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.

Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content
are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.

No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are
relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.

We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag
a post simply because you disagree with it.