"We can't even make a consistent prognosis of her fate, including... whether she is alive or dead."
UPDATE JANUARY 2010 THE MCCANNS COULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH CHILD KIDNAPPING AND TRAFFICKING (Pt Prosecutor giving evidence in an ongoing case in Portugal where the McCanns are demanding ONE MILLION POUNDS IN DAMAGES FROM THE OFFICER WHO INVESTIGATED THEM!!!

31 Aug 2008

Very interesting choice of picture for Diario to use with the article below. They do say you have to speculate to accumulate and this looks to me like a load of printing Gerry had done, did he use his Mastercard for that, knowing he would be well reimbursed. Let us not forget this couple used the Fund monies to pay their mortgage, that seriously smacks of fraud and also a couple whose finances are not exactly in good order. Clearly one would normally expect such a couple to have several thousand pounds in reserve and definitely not need to be dip into a fund ostensibly to find their missing daughter. Remember Gerry's furious remark that they were ultimately being forced to use the Find Maddie Fund, to find Maddie!! given the PJ were only looking for her body. Gerry McCann has another criminal trait I have noted that is not an endearing one either, a clear sense of entitlement, he says what is going to happen, what the agenda is and then reacts with fury when the Police are far too intelligent to agree with him! That sly smug look is omnipresent and she clings to her stage prop, reeking of eau de corpse, not nice Kate, time to tell the truth! The report below gives me cause for concern. It is understandable that the PJ wanted to know about cash withdrawals, use of his Mastercard and the amount of time spent on his mobile by Gerry McCann both before and after the disappearance of Madeleine. I do not think it was at all "disproportionate" for the PJ to want details of the transactions on Gerry's Mastercard for a period of six months. On the contrary in a major criminal investigation apparently involving fraud or financial problems being the motivation for murder it would be perfectly normal for police to scrutinise all financial transactions for a period of years, let alone months.

What are the British Police and the Home Office about? On the one hand there are so many indicators that they are taking this seriously and wish to pursue the McCanns. I particularly took heart when reading the comments of the barrister for the Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police in the High Court action the McCanns commenced demanding disclosure of all files held by LP in an action they themselves apparently started within days of Madeleine disappearing making her a Ward of Court. The barrister stressed that this case was very much still under investigation and there were operational reasons for not disclosing such details to the McCanns. But on the other hand this report is another example of where there does seem to be a clear failure to co-operate with Portuguese Police which does seem to have motivated them to abandon their own enquiry. I think there are two ways of looking at this, one there is a cover up by British authorities and a clear denial of relevant information to the Portuguese. I know a lot of people favour this view. The second is that in the UK serious investigations are dealt with in an extremely confidential way, information is not leaked to the newspapers, unless it is a strategic measure in relation to certain information to further the enquiry, generally where a direct appeal to the public is being made for help and information. Therefore there may have been concern that ultimately, whatever we disclosed to the Portuguese authorities could either be revealed to the McCanns and the general public via the Portuguese press or, ultimately, via the opening up of the investigation as has now happened. Have we therefore deliberately held vital information back to further our own enquiry into the conduct of the McCanns? Increasingly, I feel this is a very real possibility. I have read that the specialist Economic Crimes Unit at LP have also been investigating this case. This is very pertinent to the facts of this case and IMO always has been. It has been abundantly clear from a very early stage that amassing large amounts of money are very important to the McCanns and that they used Madeleine as a marketing logo employing a number of firms specialising in this area to further that aim, like Mr Halligen for example. He has no expertise at all in finding missing children does he. The McCanns are clearly worried that his name has come out in the press and the fact that this man has apparently been "axed". It would seem he was not assisting in protecting the McCanns' image at all and therefore he had to go! Quite why that is of so much concern to their DG pal remains a mystery but I have a view as to why he may be involved and so concerned. In fact it would seem, even seeking to placate Mr Murat for the wrong done to him by the false accusations.... of paedophilia, something the apparent supporters of Kate and Gerry McCann do not think we should be discussing on here. Well that clearly tells us something. However, I sometimes wonder whether they really are on Kate and Gerry's side. Their blogs are such sick and sinister places with the comments filled with hatred, venom and very perverse thinking which would not occur to a normal person. Could they really be trying to demonstrate, by association what Kate And Gerry are really like, as they so accurately portray : sinister, sick and evil!

JUSTICE FOR MADDIE, NO MATTER WHAT ROUTE THAT MAY TAKE, IF IT MEANS EXPOSING CORRUPTION THAT IS WHAT WE CONTINUE TO DO!

Request for research on the accounts of Gerry is disproportionate British authorities saw no reason to justify research bank to the father of Maddie

The Portuguese police have asked the British authorities to investigate the collaboration of Gerry McCann bank accounts under the disappearance of Maddie. However, this request was considered excessive by the British authorities, since they covered a period of six months. Initially the authorities requested a clarification to the public prosecutor Portuguese, who best explained the reasons for the request: to identify whether there was some unknown reason behind the disappearance of Maddie and whether there is any individual or individuals responsible for their disappearance. The English authorities did not accept the request for clarification of Portugal and, in its letter of reply, sent the June 16, voicing concern about the reasons that led the authorities to request information on banking operations for six months, the credit card of Martercad Maddie's father. The counting of this period of time began to April 1, about six weeks before the disappearance of the child. Despite the official explanation of the Portuguese authorities, British police also took into account an unofficial explanation provided by the research team which visited England. At the time the police said Gerry McCann from Leicestershire which had been seen to raise cash in machines and talk to the phone. The Portuguese police wanted to know whether this action could be related to the disappearance. Kennah Francs, head of UK Central Authority, explains that after weighting in the application of coercive measures, the office, sees no reason to grant the permit requirements, whereas the request is not justified and seem disproportionate. The British authorities seeking clarification new to Portugal, however, this is not sent and the case is filed just over a month later. Without evidence that the couple McCann has committed any crime, the MP decided to close the case. On July 21, Kate and Gerry, along with Robert Murat, views raised the status of accused.

25 Aug 2008

The above is further details of what Kate and Gerry told the Police which Atardi found, thanks:-)) All carefull worked out on the covers of Madeleine's story books no doubt, they knew she would not be needing those any more :-((((

-----

Hearing Gerald Patrick McCann The hearing takes place the day after the disappearance of Madeleine, 04/05/2007 at 11.15. It begins by explaining the fact that Gerry is British and, therefore, did not understand Portuguese, either spoken or written. Under what is called an interpreter "jury" name: Natalia. Its function is to translate accurately, the language of the declarant to the country's official language, words, feelings, images, phrases and verbal family used. To avoid any misinterpretation ... In 1994, Gerry McCann had already visited Portugal. He stayed in an apartment on the outskirts of Albufeira. The desire to know Portugal was due to the fact that the country is known for its excellent conditions for golf. The trip is now conducted by the suggestion of a friend David Payne who reserved the OCEAN CLUB, after making an investigation on the Internet, for the declarant, his wife and the rest of the group. Altogether, a group of nine adults and eight children including child Madeleine disappeared. The group consists of people that the declarant known for some 5 or 6 years. They travelled in two separate groups. One composed of declarant, his wife Kate and their three sons, David Payne and his wife, his two sons and his mother-in-law. This group came from the local airport from Leicestershire and another group from London, comprising four adults and three children. The meeting point was the Oceania Club in Portugal. The declarant's group arrived at 14:30 on April 28 with provenance of Faro airport by a small bus to the airport services. The other group came the same day at 13:00. After "chek in" the declarant, his wife Kate HEALY, his daughter Madeleine and her pair of twins two years, and SEAN Amelia, settled into an apartment G5A. The apartment consisted of two beds in the first room, plus two others in another room, where the company provided two cradles, in addition to the bathroom and kitchen. GERALD Kate and slept in one room and on the other, slept her three children including twin beds in the "baby" and Madeleine in a normal bed. The remaining bed was empty. Between April 28, arrival date and time when it disappeared Madelei the declarant indicates not have noticed anything unusual except that a morning of May 3, Madeleine asked his dad, Gerald, why had not the ido room while the twins crying. The declarant had not heard anything and did not move up the room. It was the first time that Madeleine had this kind of comment. In regard to the facts routine reads: On Sunday, took the breakfast, between 07:30 / 08:30 at the bar of the Ocean Club a few metres away from the apartment. In the following days due to the remoteness of the bar, began to buy food at the supermarket located in the same artery that the apartment. After breakfast the children remained in a nursery club called "Club Kid" where they engaged in various activities such as painting, collage and so on. this until 12h30, under surveillance for several employees at a ratio of one supervisor for every three children. At 12h30 iban parents looking for children and lunch at the apartment after making purchases of supplies. After lunch, at approximately 13.30, children stayed near the pool club, supervised by parents, for about 45 minutes while playing and got the sunscreen. After this time, children were returning to the "Club Kid" until around 17h00. Time to which dinner, at the bar, under the supervision of parents. After dinner of 17h00, parents gave them a bath and before preparing them for the night, leaving some time in an area of games annex to the tennis courts, always under the supervision of parents. About 19h30 / 20h00 children slept until morning routines that described above is restarted. While the children were in the "Kid Club", GERRY playing tennis with Kate, past or were "jogging". Yesterday (Note: Day of the disappearance), after the daily routines, Madeleine and the twins were sleeping in their beds at 19h30. Parents stayed in the apartment was relaxed and drinking a glass of wine until 20h30. Having found that children slept, parents, accompanied by other adults, headed towards the restaurant "tape" about 50 meters where all had dinner together. As usual, every half hour and because the restaurant was near the apartment, the declarant or his wife iban to check whether children were well. 21h05 Thus, at 21h05, the declarant entered the apartment with the help of his key because the door was closed, and headed toward the room of children, found that the twins Madeleine and were well. Then went to the toilet a few moments. He left the apartment and crossed a person with whom he had played tennis and started a small conversation, then returned to tape. 21h30 At 21h30, a friend MATT (group member) went to his apartment where they were their own children and went through the declarant's apartment through a sliding door that was always open and located on the side of the house. Entered into an apartment, saw the twins and found that Madeleine was okay. Everything was normal, blinds were closed and the door of the room was among open as ever. Then MATT back to the restaurant. 22h00 At 22h00 Kate went to check on children. Entered into an apartment through the door with the help of your password and saw that the door of the room was completely open, the window was also open up the blinds and curtains open. The doors were closed except the rear as mentioned earlier. Faced with this situation, Kate found that the twins were in their respective bed unlike that Madeleine had disappeared. Having looked carefully at the apartment, his wife, frightened and dismayed, went to the restaurant to warn the declarant of the disappearance. Immediately the group headed towards the club and searched all facilities, pool, tennis and so on. As well as an apartment, with the help of employees of the Ocean Club, and at the same time, contacted authorities. 21h10/21h15 He wants to emphasize that one element of the group, Jane, around the 21h10 / 21h15, when going to his apartment to see her children, saw about 50 metres into the artery that goes to the club, a person carrying a Children in pyjamas. Jane may clarify this situation better. Madeleine As regards to Madeleine, is described as of Caucasian race, skin white, 4 years (12/05/03) and about 90 cm in height. Delgada, dark blond hair, smooth and even shoulders. Left Eye blue and green the right however, that, with a brand of brown. It also has a small distinctive badge on your skin, brown, on his left leg. You have no scar. When disappeared, wearing a white pajamas with some pants with floral motifs and whose top had short sleeves, mainly coloured pink with a drawing of blue and ash with the inscription "Eeyore." As regards to the girl's personality is extroverted, hyper active, he can talk, cunning with a great ease of connection with other children. She never would go with a stranger. The declarant is not suspected and no one finds no reason for this act, has no enemies, neither he nor his wife. His daughter does not suffer from any illness and does not take any medicine. The declaration authorizes that a reading of his mobile phone. Apart from Kid Club, and the apartment were only once to the beach with Madeleine and the twins but during a very short time, because weather conditions were unstable. It only took an ice cream and returned to the apartment. Apart from what has been said, Madeleine and other children's Kid Club went to the beach, five minutes walk from the club for an hour. This output was organized by the company itself. Monitoring and organization were in charge of the club, the declarant and his wife were not present.

24 Aug 2008

Brian Kennedy, what exactly is he paying for personally and why? What does he have to hide? How can he make decisions about the Find Madeleine Fund?

Hi all, as will be seen from the three articles below, we now have a remarkable volte face from Kate and Gerry McCann in relation to instruction of private investigators to find Madeleine. Presumably in order to shield Kate and Gerry McCann we are told the decision to axe them was taken by Brian Kennedy who is underwriting the fund. If the Fund consists of public donations and under the control of a board of directors how can Brian Kennedy be making the decisions and why would he do that?

Immediately after the release of the files on 22 July you will see the third article from the Liverpool Echo announcing their private investigators will take over from where the PJ left off and of course we had endless hype about this from their spin doctor, Clarence Mitchell. Then in the Telegraph as recently as 13 August it is announced the McCanns have instructed an American firm to lead the hunt. But now, just a couple of weeks later they announce this firm has been axed. Clarence told us the Fund only had £500,ooo left but now it seems that is one of the reasons being offered for this firm to have got the chop, but it also says the firm have drained £500,ooo!

Well I would like to put forward another reason. The McCanns only like private investigators who pursue their bizarre agenda, that Madeleine is alive and can be found, in spite of the police concluding 'it is inevitable Madeleine died in the apartment on 3 May'. So the compliant Mr Marco stayed the course without offending against Gerry's agenda even after his ridiculous outburst last December which had he genuinely been on the trail of Madeleine would have quite obviously either led to her death or further concealment.

As ever, we are getting conflicting stories from Team McCann, did they hire the American investigators six months ago or did they hire them just a few weeks ago as the two earlier reports clearly suggest. Did the American investigators tell Gerry something he just did not want to hear, we think you are responsible based on our enquiries and there are no leads to follow from the PJ file in relation to any abduction. I am thinking it just has to be something like this for such a complete turnaroud in the space of a couple of weeks. They told us in these stories they would never stop looking for Madeleine, but apparently on the decision of someone who is not even a director of the fund, do precisely that a few weeks later. Why is there all this confusion about the role of Brian Kennedy and what he is paying for? If the money for the investigators was coming out of the fund as the article suggests how can he conduct a review and axe them? Why is Mr Kennedy involved at all, what does he have to hide? I am going to keep asking this question and I would really like to know what the police wanted to talk to him about, exactly, but I suspect I can keep waiting for the time being. Rest assured there is something seriously wrong here!

The McCanns have half a million pounds to "look for Madeleine" donated by the public for that precise purpose but they are not spending that money doing so any longer it would seem and have wanted to make this decison very public although shielding themselves from blame for actually making it. Why all the sickening lies from Clarence Mitchell ...our private investigators will be following up every lead etc. I predict that something big has happened (involving the police investigations) and the McCanns are running very scared. Seeking donations from the public and frittering their money on private investigators who are clearly never going to find poor Madeleine is a very serious criminal offence. I do not blame the Americans for getting out!

The fund for finding Madeleine now has only £500,000 left in its coffersA team of private investigators working behind the scenes to find Madeleine McCann has been axed after being paid £500,000 from publicly donated funds.The Find Madeleine Fund quietly engaged the services of a US-based company which was awarded the lucrative six-month contract earlier this year.The company, Oakley International, which boasts former British security service and FBI contacts, was hired to monitor the Madeleine Hotline, carry out detective work and review CCTV footage of possible sightings of the missing girl around the world.A source revealed that the company had also spent resources in an attempt to infiltrate a paedophile ring in Belgium.However, the company’s contract will now not be renewed. The Mail on Sunday has learned that double-glazing tycoon Brian Kennedy, who has been underwriting the fund’s search for Madeleine, has conducted a review of the agency’s work and has become unhappy with the progress it was making.The deal was abruptly ended following a meeting last week after the fund brought in independent monitors to assess how the money was spent.The cost of employing the agency - run by a Briton, Kevin Halligen - has drained the Madeleine fund and there is now less than £500,000 left.The development is likely to dismay the thousands who gave to the appeal, and raise questions about how the fund has been administered.Mr Kennedy, who owns Sale Sharks rugby club, was said to be ‘angry’ because he believed Oakley’s bills, estimated to be more than £80,000 a month, were too much for the results they achieved.A source said: ‘There is a sense that they were meaning well but hadn’t got as far as they should for the money involved.'Brian Kennedy thought their work was far too pricey and wanted to know where the money was being spent. He wasn’t satisfied with their answers and the contract was not renewed.‘Madeleine’s parents, Gerry and Kate, have been kept informed all along and agree with the decision. A lot of people were asking questions about where the money was being spent.’

Kate and Gerry McCann agree with the decision to drop Oakley InternationalOakley International won the contract after an introduction by another company, Red Defence International (RDI), based in Jermyn Street, Central London.Listed as being involved with both companies was Mr Halligen, 47, a communications expert. He is given as the ‘contact name’ for Oakley International Group, a company registered in Washington DC as the manufacturer of search and navigation equipment.The company says it has annual sales of £33,000 and only one employee, who appears to be Mr Halligen.The address given for the company is 2550 M Street NW Washington, which is the downtown office of Patton Boggs, one of the largest and most powerful law companies in America.A source at the law firm said last night that the lawyer who represented Mr Halligen was unavailable for comment.RDI, formed in 2005, bills itself as ‘an experienced provider of crisis prevention, management and expertise’. It claims to have a presence in Washington DC and Virginia and representation in the Middle East, Africa and Central America.

Brian Kennedy, who has underwritten the search for Madeleine, is dissatisfied with the agency's workHowever, its latest set of accounts is two months overdue and it faces being fined by HM Revenue & Customs.Among the main players working on the McCann contract were Mr Halligen and Henri Exton, 57, who headed the Greater Manchester Police undercover unit until 1993. He then worked for the Government before moving into the private sector.One day after a crisis meeting last week with the Madeleine fund administrators, Mr Halligen resigned as a director of RDI.Mr Exton, of Bury, Lancashire, has the Queen’s Police Medal and an OBE. During the Seventies and Eighties his work included uncovering organised crime rings and recruiting supergrasses.He also infiltrated football gangs, at one stage becoming a leader of the Young Guvnors, who followed Manchester City, and was forced to take part in organised incidents to preserve his cover.Previously, the McCann fund had employed a Spanish detective agency called Metodo 3. However, the fund lost confidence in them, especially after they announced they would find Madeleine by last Christmas.She had disappeared from the resort of Praia da Luz, Portugal, on May 3, 2007, nine days short of her fourth birthday.A spokesman for the McCanns said yesterday: ‘Kate and Gerry, the fund and their backers have always sought to employ the very best people and resources in the ongoing search for Madeleine.‘Kate and Gerry, via the fund and the backers, continue to employ many such resources and it is true that Red Defence and Oakley were part of those resources.‘I simply will not comment on any personnel, financial or operational details whatsoever.’No one could be reached for comment at Oakley International or Red Defence International.Mr Kennedy, estimated to be worth about £250million, became involved after being moved by the plight of the McCanns during the period they were made formal suspects – arguidos – in Madeleine’s disappearance. Portuguese prosecutors dropped the couple’s arguido status last month.The 47-year-old made his money in double-glazing and home improvement ventures with companies including Everest windows. His Latium Group business empire has an annual turnover of about £400million.

------------------

Madeleine McCann's parents hire US private investigatorsMadeleine McCann's parents have hired a US private investigator firm made up of former CIA and FBI agents and special forces veterans as part of a renewed push to find their missing daughter, it was reported.

By Aislinn Simpson Last Updated: 8:47AM BST 13 Aug 2008The team are said to be taking over primary responsibility for the investigating into Madeleine's disappearance, although the Spanish firm Metodo 3, which has until now spearheaded the search, will continue to follow up information from Spain and Portugal.The news comes shortly after Portuguese police shelved the case and released a 30,000 page dossier detailing their investigation.The dossier has revealed thousands of potential sightings of the three-year-old following her disappearance from the family's rented holiday apartment in Praia da Luz in the Algarve on May 3 last year.The US firm, which has not been named, is said to have been offered a £500,000 six-month contract by the Find Madeleine Fund, which has received donations from several wealthy benefactors and wellwishers around the world.However, according to previous reports, there is only £500,000 left in the fighting fund.A friend of Kate and Gerry McCann said of the hiring: "It was felt that a truly international firm was now needed to lead the inquiry. These really are the big boys."Last month, the couple, both doctors from Rothley in Leicestershire, had their status as suspects in the Portuguese police inquiry lifted.The release of the police dossier revealed that police tried to elicit a confession from Gerry McCann by telling him that conclusive DNA evidence that been found linking his daughter to a car the family hired after her disappearance.The dossier also included details of sightings around the world, including in the Caribbean, Belgium and Holland.-----------------

Liverpool Echo, presumably printing just what the McCanns want them to print..

Madeleine McCann: Private detectives take over searchJul 22 2008

Yesterday’s announcement that the inquiry is being shelved is a milestone, but not the kind the McCanns wanted.But they have privately expressed dissatisfaction with the Portuguese police for some time and pursued their own investigation.The couple felt the search for Madeleine had stalled while they were at the centre of the inquiry.This is one of the main reasons why they have since September employed their own private investigators to look for their daughter.Now the police have stopped actively investigating Madeleine’s disappearance, these detective agencies will lead the worldwide hunt for the missing child.At present they are not short of resources - the McCanns have several wealthy backers and a “fighting fund” with a healthy balance.And these private detectives will receive a major boost when the family’s lawyers gain access to the Portuguese police files this week.This will give them both an idea of what has been ruled out and many new avenues for investigation.Mr and Mrs McCann have vowed that they will never give up looking for Madeleine.

22 Aug 2008

Contradictions of Kate and Gerry Young said details on the different night when the child disappeared. Parents zangaram (argued I think!) up the night before the disappearance of Maddie and Kate slept in the child's bedroom By: Claudia Lima da Costa / and Patricia "Lawyer of McCann sees no reason to prosecute State " (better shut up then Clarence or do you know better than the lawyers??) Kate insists she never touched the windows but only her fingerprints..They do not want to explain why they argued and Kate slept alone on 2 May, I have a feeling it would be to do with all those bruises she was sporting and his interest in others (adults) /himself more than her!

"Maddie: the tracks unfulfilled The McCann gave contradictory versions about the facts of the night of the disappearance of Madeleine, in particular, regarding some details of his daughter. Also a zanga(argument) on May 2 is described by the couple in a different way. The behaviour of parents was examined by the Judicial Police, that a certain height, in the course of research, qualifies as strange.

One of the main contradictions in the testimony of McCann, which took place in early September, is the way the daughter was lying down that night: Kate ensures that left Madeleine obscured, under the blankets. (The pictures of Maddie's bed do not seem to show that it had been slept in, it is just turned back) In turn, Gerry gives a contrary information: when was seeing children, before leaving for dinner, says that he saw Madeleine lying on the left side, totally destapada: lying on top of colcha with manta and with the plush turn .

Never mexeu in the window: fingerprints contradict The fingerprints contradict the testimony of Kate McCann: the mother ensures that never opened even saw the window blinds of the fourth Maddie raised from the day we arrived at the Praia da Luz, however, the only fingerprints found in the window are Kate. The sleep habits of the Madeleine are not counted by parents equally. Gerry said in testimony that the date of disappearance, the child slept well. However, in 2006, created the habit of twice a week, agreed by the 23h-24h and go to their parents' room. In turn, and despite assume that the daughter had problems with sleep, Kate ensures that it raised between 2 am and 3 am. The zanga of Kate and Gerry Kate will not have liked the way it dealt with Gerry on May 2, on the eve of Maddie disappear. This was acknowledged and described by the six days in September, when it was heard in the Judiciary of Portimao. On May 2, after dinner at Tapas, the group of friends Tuesday will be directed to the bar in the same area of restoration. Allegedly Gerry ignored Kate and she does not like. You have chosen to sleep in one quarter of children in retaliation. While admitting that even if deitou next to the husband, turned out to raise and spend the night in the fourth of the children. It is recalled that the possibility of there having been a zanga between the couple is placed by Gonçalo Amaral, the first time that vai apartment to the beach of Light, May 4, and is facing the layout and details of the rooms, which describes in his book "Maddie the truth of lies". Gerry after day September 7, confirmed the incident and admits that the night before the disappearance, Kate slept in the child's bedroom, held in bed to the window. However, says it is unable to specify the reason, suggesting only that the blame would usually resonate. The strange behaviour of McCann The inspector appointed to liaison between Police and the Judicial couple McCann describes, in the process of the case 'Maddie' strange behavior of parents, especially after the diligence of dogs British experts, who identified the corpse in apartment odor. There are complaints about the PJ give more importance to other avenues than the possibility of abduction: the reaction of Kate, when it is notified to come to the Judiciary in September, was even questioning whether the PJ was not being pressured by the government to stop with the investigation, and that their parents and journalists would think of the situation. Or even the stubbornness of Gerry deliver in this inspector letters and e-mails, which received from people with mental capacities and mediums, with information on the disappearance of Maddie, and that he had selected. Without evidence that the couple McCann has committed any crime, the MP decided to close the case. On July 21, Kate and Gerry, along with Robert Murat, views raised the status of accused.

16 Aug 2008

Happy 4th Birthday to Madeleine - there just are no words to express this macabre spectacle really, are there? Was it the thought of the scene below and what fame and riches it could bring him that gave Gerry McCann such pure joy? Plain evil.

JUSTICE FOR MADDIE !

Could these be the trousers the PJ refer to, with the death scent on them? Kate looks very unwell in this pic..

The McCanns in the early days in PDL, clearly devastated over the loss of their daughter but comforted by the Paypal donations flooding in and their "online shop".

Gerry loudmouth McCann, wishes the worst for his daughter within just a few hours of her er apparently being snatched by a network of paedophiles. The files reveal a British tourist overheard him actually saying this on his mobile. Was he out looking for her, no of course not, he was glued to his mobile setting his sickening money spinning schemes into action. Was Kate out looking for her, no she was not as she confessed in the original interview with Jane Hill, BBC. She sat on her bed on her mobile and of course they had to prepare a script of what each member of the TAPAS would say, again, as she told Jane Hill, they were very busy. How weird Gerry just happened to have some large prints of Madeleine handy to give to the police at 2 am, where did those just come from!! But no doubt the best for the gruesome twosome as they seek to cover her death and rake in a load of cash with their disgusting claims. Even 15 months later, the couple from hell, who simply have no shame, persist with their repulsive claims. Of course he does not wish to comment on the clear evidence that Madeleine died in their apartment, well why not Mr Loudmouth? Why don't you blog about that, we would all be keen to hear your comments/.

This report also mentions details of concerns being expressed in the investigation about David Payne having an unnatural interest in children. I remain absolutely convinced the British Police and all other agencies working on this case will not be filing this case. I believe they have quite naturally taken over this serious investigation from the Portuguese authorities and a great deal of the information they gleaned from the investigation has not been made public, for very good reason, because it continues to be investigated. I say this to the McCanns, you know your daughter is dead, we know your daughter is dead and we are sick of your lies and cashing in on her death. It is time to start telling the truth or just shutting up and crawling under a stone, where you belong.

JUSTICE FOR MADDIE!

Viv x

Correio de Manha

August 16, 2008 - 00:30 am Research: PJ followed track of 150 paedophiles Prime suspect was in Iraq The disappearance of Maddie on May 3, 2007 the Judicial Police led to hundreds of clues linked to paedophilia. The officers followed the steps of 150 paedophiles and perpetrators of crimes of a sexual nature, without, however, could establish a link between the disappearance of the child and a sexual predator. The first suspect to be followed by PJ early in the investigation was a sexual abuser of children, nationality English, fled the UK in 2005, with links to a bar located at 150 meters from where the fourth Maddie disappeared. However, the PJ to establish contact with his stepfather, who would tell investigators that the couple was in Iraq. The English authorities confirm this information and track would be abandoned. At the beginning of research, the British newspaper 'The Sun' reported that the Algarve is a refuge for paedophiles British, living in the region 130. Some came to be being interrogated by the PJ. Also a couple English suspicious about the relationship of David Payne (friend of McCann) with children, but only in October is that the British deliver information to the PJ, leaving nothing proved a link on the doctor. In the same month, following the operation 'Predador', experts from PJ observe the faces of hundreds of children on sites for paedophiles looking for a runway. GERRY EXPLICA DESAPARECIMENTO WITH PEDOFILIA A few hours after Maddie had disappeared in Praia da Luz, Algarve, her father, Gerry McCann, said in a telephone conversation that the girl English, then in three years, had been the victim of a kidnapping by a network of paedophiles. Gerry's words were later told by another English citizen on vacation in Ocean Club to Judicial Police. The tourists heard the call without that if Gerry saw their presence. PROTECTED DATA POLICE INGLESA REFUSAL The British police chose to maintain the confidentiality of the list of paedophiles referenced in the process. PRIVACY PRESERVADA The disclosure of the identities was considered an intrusion of privacy. Nothing was proved against a paedophile involvement of ears. NEW INTERROGATÓRIO Some British newspapers gave yesterday to preventing the prosecutor to a new interrogation to McCann. PRESS SKY NEWS Gerry McCann launched new call on the authorities to deliver data to help find his daughter. 'THE SUN' Official notes that research has found that the more likely it is that Maddie is dead.

10 Aug 2008

This is the area behind the sofa in the McCanns apt - given that firstly a very excited Eddie had signalled cadaver odour (also in the McCann bedroom near the wardrobe and the patio outside their bedroom, to a lesser extent flower bed underneath the patio - remember Rebelo's officer jumping up and down on this) secondly Keela signalled blood, the tiles were very carefully removed by a FSS officer and taken to the lab in Birmingham for analysis. As we know the result of those tests were that the blood found was indicative of it being Madeleine's but not conclusive. See my second post below as to what Goncalo has to say about this, clearly both dogs would not signal so clearly if Madeleine's corpse had not been there, stringent checks were made to see whether anyone else died in the apt - negative. Therefore the clear assumption was made by the expert present that Madeleine died there. It was because of British intervention the McCanns were made suspects after the PJ asked for our specific forensic assistance.

As is usual in case where a child has been abducted the McCanns were allocated a British Police Liaison Officer. Some, including myself, may not be surprised to read that by the 14 May the Liaison Officer was saying to Kate McCann "where is Maddie". Particularly following the release of the PJ files we are increasingly coming to see Kate McCann for the petulant, rude and arrogant person she is. She lost her temper and this Liaison Officer lasted just a week! But then again liaison officers are provided to parent victims as in the case of Holly and Jessica, clearly this liaison officer realised they were anything but victims. They strode around smiling and laughing, holding press conferences, jogging and playing tennis. Using Madeleine's image, as Gerry so accurately said, as a good marketing ploy. Marketing is done to raise cash. This is what has always enraged me about this couple, they went against police advice and put her life in danger to sell her, clearly knowing she had already lost her short life. Being responsible for the death of your child is quite bad enough, cashing in and making money out of it to defend yourself and improve your lifestyle is quite another, it is grotesque, as are all the ridiculous claims about sightings in Amsterdam and nearby Belgium. I reproduced last night day 34 of Gerry's blog, 6/6/07 where he points out that managed to fit in a visit to their dear friends in Amsterdam who were campaigning vigorously on their behalf. They still are, but as Docmac has just demonstrated by providing a link to comments on Virgin, the public have just about heard enough of this couple's ridiculous and shambolic lies. It seems they even want to go back on TV again, on Crimewatch, I will be telling the BBC what I think if they allow them to do this and would urge others to do the same!

I would also stress again this article in Correio de Manha confirms the British Police are most certainly not on the side of Kate and Gerry McCann. We just need to be patient! They changed the type of officer they wanted out there from a Liaison Officer to support a couple of rogues to Mark Harrison an expert in homicide detection techniques sent to help net a couple of rogues. We used technology and spared no expense. We do not care about the costs in such a case. Please remember that.

Viv x

August 10, 2008 - 00:30 am Research: Experts asked where was Maddie Police annoyed the English McCann The parents of Madeleine McCann desentenderam with the English police the early days after the disappearance of the girl. On May 14, Kate Healy proved to be shocked and frustrated with the British official liaison to the family. The cause of disagreement have arisen when researchers asked where Kate was his daughter. Police officers from the United Kingdom with the mission to provide support for the McCann family are professionals with specific training in abductions and kidnappings. Its task would be to give support to McCann, establish a bridge with the Judicial Police and work together with other British agents installed in the Algarve. At its presence in Portugal, the investigations indicated the thesis of kidnapping as the most consistent. According to the former coordinator of the process Gonçalo Amaral, liaison officers from the family "did not come to last more than one week in their duties", after the disagreement with the family. The difficulty of communication between the couple and the researchers never was, however, officially communicated to the Judicial Police. The withdrawal of Portugal for the specialists in kidnappings and abductions occurring two months before the same British authorities suggest the Judicial Police greater attention in view of the child's death on the spot, a possibility which until then was a secondary level of research. For Portugal is then sent the forensic expert Mark Harrison, adviser for national searches of all the police agencies of the United Kingdom to the level of homicides and missing persons. It is Mark Harrison who recommends the use of dogs to detect smell the corpses. Interpol SEGUIU MORE THAN EMC PISTAS IN BELGIUM In Belgium, 107 people claim to have seen Maddie. However, Interpol in Brussels had not revealed any success in the collection of evidence leading to the child hostage. Also in the squad from Leicestershire, where they live the McCann in June last year, the detective John Hughes drew a little encouraging result for searches. Meanwhile, the Spanish private detectives reported that the Method 3 will prosecute the British newspapers that accused the Mafia. The Spaniards say now that their participation in the search was "low". STRONG MEANS HIGH-TECH British spared no efforts in using technology to find Maddie. TASK PORTUGAL In PJ of Portimão, the British mounted a room of research known as Task Portugal. PROFILE OF RAPTOR Several British experts collaborated to trace the profile of possible raptor. USE OF DOGS Dogs Englishmen had already participated in over 200 operations. PRESS 'MIRROR' Official reports that Portuguese police have attempted to do surveillance at the house of McCann, but judge refused the request. 'THE SUN' Apparitions of girls similar to Maddie again arise in Belgium.

4 Aug 2008

The PJs log of the contents of McCann hire car. Proof if any were needed that someone, or maybe two is an alcoholic!

I cannot figure out what the horrible thing is that looks like a blood bag! Who carries rice crispies in the boot!!

PJ carefully logged stains to floor and walls of McCann apt.

Is this the one the nanny supposedly printed! Or was it sly Gezza at home circa 20.5.07 on his paint pro kit! Maddie does look a real good marketing ploy there, I think! Check out the spiky fringe, whoops Gezza!

Within a few days of 3.5.07 a 69 year old design engineer, Mr Fleck, a man with a good eye for detail, I am sure, gave this e-fit picture of a suspicious man he saw hanging around the McCann apartment just before Madeleine disappeared. He says he had short dark hair, strong athletic build and aged 30-40, height about 5'8". I agree with everyone on the 3 Arguidos this is Gerry McCann and I am frankly flabbergasted the McCanns seem to be carping this image was not released! If we can think, hang on a minute that looks and sounds just like Gerry McCann then you can bet your bottom doller that's what the PJ thought too. No wonder they did not release it to the world or to the McCanns!! As I believe Goncalo has confirmed the McCanns were always under suspicion and rightly so! There is another e-fit said to be a ringer for OB but it seems to me this could be another witness again describing Gerry although it is not such a striking likeness. Anyone who actually saw OB could not have failed t notice his striking height and there does not seem to be mention of this, we keep hearing the same over and again, including from Jane Tanner, short dark hair aged 30-40, 5' 8" in other words, Gerry McCann. I have always said his behaviour in calling that woman to the table at 9.30 was quite deliberate. IMO at this stage OB was missing and had taken over and Gezza was making sure he was not in the frame, but the thing is now we have yet another witness who saw him in addition to Smith. As we know from the Barry George case though such identification evidence is not good enough, there were nine people in that case who put George at the scene but this evidence was trashed by the defence, even in broad daylight some witnesses account were shaken. In this only one person saw Gerry carrying Maddie and he did not say it was Gerry until September when he saw him getting off the plane on TV, carrying Sean. The other man seeing him hanging around would not be good enough to corroborate this. So many pointers but just not quite enough at this stage to actually get them, but they will!

Gerry normally combs his hair across the front leaving no fringe but on this pic and the really evil one to the right you can see that sometimes he is not so groomed leaving that short spiky fringe. Maybe someone who got a lot of alcohol down them and had a lot of adrenaline flowing would not be quite so careful about the comb. I know he is an immaculate and fussy man as a rule. Rigid timekeeper etc, it fits his personality.

Well, if the McCanns thought the allegations against them were suddenly going to stop, just how wrong they were! Another example of how the McCanns staged Madeleine's "abduction".

PJ believes that McCann changed evidence The Judiciary Police has no doubt that the parents of Maddie changed the provision of furniture and objects from the apartment where Maddie disappeared the night of May 3, 2007, in the Algarve, thus manipulating the scene of the crime to better justify the thesis of abduction which has always advocated.

and as though that were not bad enough of course 0n 1 August Correio gave us those 48 questions that Kate refused to answer:

Kate McCann - defensive, petulant, arrogant and rude. Not exactly a woman searching for her beloved child, is she?

She just wanted to "increase the political pressure" on those who sought to investigate her..

Viv x

Research: What the inspectors wanted to know the PJ The 48 questions that remained unanswered September 7, 2007. Kate McCann entered the Judicial Police of Portimão in the morning and interrogation had been to night. It was heard as a witness, but the tension in the air was clear. For the first time, popular concentrated to the door of the premises of PJ and murmuravam words of defiance against the couple. That day the CM noticiara that the dogs had detected the odor of corpses clothes of the mother of Maddie. A proof that the authorities wanted to use as a trump card in a hearing that only the next day changed direction after the PJ not see clarified their doubts. Kate began by answering all the questions, but to be formed defendant left to speak. Remeteu to the silence, in the company's lawyer, provocatively and accepted all the suggestions. Less than 48 hours later, Kate and Gerry travel to England with the twins, leaving behind the investigation to the disappearance of their daughter, which has now had four years. Garantiram after we return if it were necessary - which they never did, but had not been formally intimados to return - and are no longer defendants for suspected involvement in the concealment of the body of the child. Today the CM shows him the 48 questions that Kate did not want to respond in questioning and reflecting the concerns of researchers. More than a year after Maddie disappear, many of these questions remain unanswered. APUPOS FOR THE COUPLE MCCANN The way Kate and Gerry McCann of the premises of PJ of Portimão marked a turning point in the relationship of popular with the couple: the curious who passed on the street apuparam mother and father of Maddie, particularly criticising the "absence of visible suffering" of Kate. It also marked the foreign press presence in large numbers. PASSA PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC NOW FROM tomorrow As from tomorrow the whole investigation to the disappearance of Madeleine will be made available to defendants, witnesses, lawyers and journalists, because it is a case of manifest public interest. The process, which was filed on July 21, will also be accessible to the general public, a situation that will allow real scrutiny of the work done by the Judicial Police. This decision, which ultimately was surprised because it is a case involving a child, has only just been announced, after the Portuguese lawyers of the family McCann, Carlos Pinto de Abreu and Rogerio Alves, have requested the Court of Portimão priority in access to the file . Already last Wednesday had asked the court to all parties who had previously requested the consultation on file to leave a CD in office since the process will be provided in digital format. The archival research to the disappearance of the girl, occurred on May 3, 2007, in the Algarve, precipitated the lifting of the secrecy of justice, which had been extended until precisely the month of August. APONTAMENTOS OF KATE MCCANN "All policemen dressed informally and smoking. There was demonstrated sympathy. It was far from reassuring." -- May 4 "Left message to Gordon Brown to call us to increase the political pressure." -- May 23 "How do you dare to insinuate that our daughter could be in danger for our cause?" -- June 17 NOTES KATE: SENTADA ON BED The Judicial Police was asked to Kate during the searches on the night of the disappearance was sitting in bed, Maddie without moving. Do not been answered. PRESSÕES: GONÇALO AMARAL The former coordinator of the event, Gonçalo Amaral, account in the book 'The Truth Lie of' the pressures incurred during the investigation, confirmed by Kate in their notebooks. PORTIMÃO: JUDICIAL The process focused on the Judicial Police of Portimao. The interrogation of September 7 forced the special security measures outside the building. 48 THE QUESTIONS OF WHAT TO JUDICIAL KATE NO RESPONDEU 1 - On May 3, 2007, by 22:00, when entered the apartment, which saw, as he did, where sought, which manuseou? 2 - An inside the closet of the room of the couple? (said he did not respond) 3 - (Views two photos of the closet of his room) may describe its content? 4 - Why the cortinado behind the sofa opposite side of the window (whose photo he was shown) is mexido? Someone went behind that sofa? 5 - How long did it take to search the apartment after the detection of the disappearance of her daughter Madeleine? 6 - Why said from the outset that Madeleine had been kidnapped? 7 - On the assumption that Maddie had been kidnapped, that the twins left alone at home to go to Tapas to raise the alarm? So because the alleged raptor could still be in the apartment. 8 - Why not asked the twins, at that time, what had happened to the sister or why not asked them later? 9 - When the alarm has in Tapas specifically what I said and what the words? 10 - What happened then to the alarm in Tapas? 11 - Why was tell their friends instead of shouting balcony? 12 - Who contacted the authorities? 13 - who participated in the search? 14 - anyone outside the group, in the minutes following, was to learn of the disappearance of Maddie? 15 - Some nearby it offered aid after the disappearance? 16 - What does the expression "we let her down"? 17 - The Jane said you have seen a man with a child that night? 18 - How were contacted authorities and that police force was warned? 19 - During the searches, and already with the police presence, where local Maddie was sought, how and in what way? 20 - Why is not the twins agreed during the search or when they were in the upper deck? 21 - For those who telephoned after the facts? 22 - Ligou for SKY News? 23 - I knew the danger of turning to the media because it could influence the raptor? 24 - asked the presence of a priest? 25 - What is the method of disseminating the face of Madeleine, where photo, if other? 26 - It is true that during the search was sitting in bed, Maddie without moving? 27 - What is your behaviour that night? 28 - It sleep? 29 - Before the trip to Portugal made any comment on a pressentimento or a bad omen? 30 - What is the behavior of Madeleine? 31 - Maddie suffered any illness or taking medication? 32 - What is the relationship of Madeleine with brothers? 33 - What is the relationship of Maddie with brothers, friends and colleagues of school? 34 - On your life, in how many and which hospitals worked? 35 - What is your medical specialty? 36 - Trabalhava shift in emergencies or other services? 37 - Trabalhava daily? 38 - In a time no longer work? Why? 39 - The twin children have difficulty in sleeping, are irrequietos and this causes him intranquilidade? 40 - It is true that at certain times felt desperate for the behaviour of their children and that the left much intranquila? 41 - It is true that in England came to mind Madeleine surrender the custody of a family? 42 - In England, gave medication to children? What kind of medication? 43 - In the self you were shown films of inspection cinotécnica, as a forensic, where you can see the mark by these indications of odor on the human body and blood also traces of human and only human nature, and all comments the expert responsible. After viewing, and after signalling the odor of corpses in his room next to the closet and behind the sofa against the window of the living room, said he could not explain anything more than has already stated? 44 - also noted, the dog detection, human blood behind the sofa, said he could not explain anything more than has already stated 45 - Assinalado the smell of corpses from the rented car that one months after the disappearance said he can not explain anything more than already said? 46 - Assinalado human blood in the trunk of the vehicle said he can not explain anything more than has already stated? 47 - Faced with the result of collecting DNA from Maddie, whose analysis was carried out by a British laboratory, behind the sofa and the tailgate of the vehicle, said he can not explain anything more than has already stated? 48 - took some responsibility or intervention in the disappearance of her daughter? Question that said: Are you aware that failure to respond to questions calls into question the research, which seeks to know what happened with your daughter? He said that yes, if the research does so.

1 Aug 2008

Well guys I think this report confirms those sightings do not have a lot of credence for the PJ and will put set aside as they say for further investigation, which I guarantee is ongoing!This I predict will be what really hangs the McCanns, fraudsters get carried away with their over-zealous efforts to con and manipulate and as we now know, this is also coming directly from Kate McCann and has done since the very outset. fOR gER1NUIPC-201/07.0 GALGS4th BrigadeInspector João CarlosDenouncer/Offended – Judiciary PoliceDenunciated/Arguidos - Robert James Queriol Evelegh Murat,identified and questioned at pgs. 1170, 1947 and1959.*Gerald Patrick McCann, identified andquestioned at pgs. 2569.*Kate Marie Healy, identified and questioned atpgs. 2557.Witnesses/Persons inquired – see IndexType of Crime – UnknownTime and Place – Between 21H05 and 22H00 of the day 3 May of 2007,at the G5A apartment, located at the touristic resort ‘Ocean Club’, Vila daLuz, Lagos.Apprehended Objects – see Index (all the apprehended objects weregiven back to the owners by means of term)Examinations done – see Index2***Final Report****Introduction*These documents relate to an occurrence which describes thedisappearance of a minor of British nationality, Madeleine Beth McCann,daughter of Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, on the date withthree (almost four) years old.According to the Time and Place, the facts occurred on the day 3 of May of2007, in a temporal hiatus, understood to be between 21H05 and 22H00(being certain that after 17H30, only Gerald and Kate had contact withMadeleine) at the resort named ‘Ocean Club’, located in Vila da Luz, Lagos,place, where the minor’s family, along with seven other persons, withwhom they had a friendship relationship, where enjoying some holidays,with the duration of one week.The arrival of the group from England, at national territory, via Faro’sairport, took place on the 28 of April 2007.They travelled in two separate groups, since they live in different locations.The trip from the airport to the place of Luz was done in a mini bus,provided by the resort management company ‘Mark Warner’.3Upon check-in, they were placed into several apartments, all located inblock G5, next to each other, which was an imposition, or at least asuggestion, made by the entire group.They were all lodged in the ground floor, except the PAYNE family (David,Fiona and Diane Webster), which was lodged in the first floor.The MCCANN family was given apartment G5A, which is located on theleft end of the residential block (seen from the front) and therefore, it canbe said, the most accessible one and with facilitated visibility from theoutside.This is a group where seven of the elements are medics, from variousspecialties, which adds to the fact that all of them have under-age children,which accompanied them. The MCCANN family was composed of theparents, as well as MADELEINE and the twins SEAN and AMELIE, thesebeing two years old, at the date of the facts.This trip was organized by the PAYNE family, namely by the male elementof the couple, DAVID ANTHONY PAYNE, who had knowledge, as a user,of the tourist resorts that belong to the “Mark Warner” company.The group shared among themselves a friendship that existed before thistrip, based on professional relationships and other holiday trips.It is pointed out that this was the first time that the elements of the groupwere on holidays at this resort on national territory for the first time, andthat the group’s will to carry out the trip was planned approximately onemonth before it took place.4On the other hand, nothing indicates that any of the participants had anyprevious connection to Vila da Luz or that there resided or stayed anyperson related to them.The group’s daily routine implied their movement, for dinner, to the TapasRestaurant, which is located at the resort (although outside of the specificarea of the apartments and without permitting a complete visual control ofthe latter), while their underage children remained alone – supposedlyasleep – in their apartments while the dinner was under way.According to the group’s common version, the checking of the children wasdone through regular visits by the adults to the apartments, with an –approximate – spacing of half an hour, with the exception of the children ofthe PAYNE couple, that possessed a technological system of self control,via intercommunication (“baby listening”).Constitution of the group:DAVID ANTHONY PAYNE – apartment 5H (first floor)FIONA ELAINE PAYNEDIANNE WEBSTERRUSSEL JAMES O’BRIEN – apartment 5DJANE MICHELLE TANNER5MATTHEW DAVID OLDFIELD – apartment 5BRACHAEL MARIAMMA (sic) JEAN MANPILLYGERALD PATRICK McCANN – apartment 5AKATE MARIE HEALYThe aforementioned persons were interviewed carefully and in great detail,on various occasions (see index), with the intention to collect all therelevant elements that could help the investigation to uncover the truthregarding the facts.The analysis of the grouping of these inquiries emphasized the existence ofimportant details which were not entirely understood and integrated, whichneeded to be, from our viewpoint, tested and compared together[concatenated] in the actual location.As such, a concrete understanding of the lack of synergy of some aspectsof elevated relevance should be attempted through a processed diligencevia the reconstitution of the facts, which, due to a lack of collaboration ofseveral relevant witnesses, was not able to be accomplished, in spite of allthe force brought by the authorities.Further ahead, in this report, the necessity of this diligence will be betteranalysed.6* * *The investigation, during more than 13 months, followed all the credibleindices related to different hypotheses and, in an impartial manner,continued to analyse, correlate and synthesize them, looking for anexplanation for the happenings of the night of 3 May 2007.Assuming that the minor’s disappearance was due to the acts of thirdparties, the PJ explored various lines of investigation, not excluding anyhypothesis considered plausible or hypothetically acceptable.From the documentation, you will observe that during the investigationvarious possibilities were contemplated.As such, consider:1. abduction, for sexual exploration or other (e.g, later adoption, childtrafficking, organ trafficking), without homicide;2. abduction, followed by homicide with (or without) hiding of thecorpse;3. accidental death, with later hiding of the corpse;7The Hypothesis 1 and 2 were considered in the double notion of the illicit ofabduction (if that happened) that could have had occurred due to feelingsof revenge by theKidnapper(s) towards the parents (intended abduction) or by taking merelythe opportunity of the child being at a vulnerable situation (opportunityabduction).As a remote hypothesis, the possibility of the minor leaving the apartmentby her own means was explored – that would be highly unlikely physically– and after, because of an accident or by a third person intervention, shewould have disappeared.* * *As to the present report, and for a better understanding, it will be dividedin to 5 major areas, to know:- Generic diligences for the localization of the minor, entwined in the mainbody of the Inquest, done by the Judiciary Police, the Maritime Police andthe G.N.R.;- Thematic Appendixes, in a total of nine (sub-divided into 55 volumes)referred to the pgs. 3528-a, whose creation allows to complement the mainbody of the processes and to follow up all the information received andtreated;- The suspicions about ROBERT MURAT, and his status of arguido;- The Cadaver Dogs Units searches and the subsequent establishment ofthe parents of the British minor, GERALD MCCANN and KATE HEALY asarguidos;8- The forensic and laboratorial exams, done at the Forensic Science Serviceand at the National Institute of Forensic Medicine, from now on designatedas the FSS and INML, correspondingly;Even though there is this division in to sub groups, the present report willbe done by order of occurrence or information, without the obstacle ofjoining by themes, when the chronological order it is not sufficient.* * *As stated before, it was done a presentation of the intervenients in theprocess and a brief introduction of the facts. Following, we will do a moredetailed explanation, where, likewise, the various intervenients will matchand the actions done by them will take on a procedural relevance.* * *Relative to the appendixes, in a total of nine, where divided thematically asstated:Appendix I – Forensic Exams – where all the exams and forensics thatwere carried out by scientific and technical entities, specifically those whoare destined to the detection, collection and traces analyses that could leadto the understanding of what happened and to the discovery of the culpritsin the disappearance of the minor.9Appendix II – Analysis of communications – where all the inventory,analysis and pertinent correlations, which were possible and eventuallyrelevant about the communications and movements that were made before,during and after the facts, were made;Appendix III – Inspections, canine, maritime and air searches –where the specific diligences that were carried out in an attempt tophysically locate the minor, especially in the surrounding areas, aredescribed;Appendix IV – Searches/apprehensions, direct exams,delivery/deposit of goods – where the set of diligences that were directedon goods or items that could eventually be connected to the disappearanceare listed;Appendix V – Supposed sightings and localizations – where the newsthat had some credibility and signalled the alleged presence of the child invarious locations worldwide, as well as the hundreds of diligences that werecarried out to confirm or dismiss them, are listed.As it is known, the disappearance of the British minor, under thecircumstances that were described, implied the action of diverse entities,with special relevance for the intervention of the Polícia Judiciária, which wasjoined by other forces of criminal police. In parallel, this disappearanceconcentrated an unmatched dynamics from the media, both national andforeign, namely and with more emphasis in the United Kingdom, which filled,for days in a row, their news at prime time with live transmissions from10Praia da Luz, and special programmes that were dedicated to the issue.On the other hand, the parents of the minor redoubled their efforts tomake the most diverse contacts and appeals, releasing pictures ofMADELEINE, at the same time that the British Authorities opened aspecialised and permanent contact line to receive all the information inconnection with the disappearance, as well as information coming fromInterpol and similar police agencies.This activity (dissemination of information), apart from news provided bythe media, was aimed at obtaining, in the shortest possible time,information that would aid the investigation in 2 different ways:finding MADELEINE alive and retrieve data about the circumstances of herdisappearance and about a potential criminal involvement by a third party,having to that end been requested the committed cooperation of thepopulation.This collaborative approach resulted in many leads being passed onto thepolice, by the most diverse sources and by the most unusual means, mostof them made directly to the police.From 04/05/2007, the day after the event, initially at an enormous rate,thousands of sightings were reported to the police, from everywhere inPortugal and the most diverse foreign countries, from neighbouring Spainto the distant Indonesia and Singapore, being the missing minor"recognised" in the most diverse locations and companies to the extentthat she is suposedly seen on the same day in places 4000 Km apart.11Some of the information did not merit, due to the circumstancessurrounding it, the least credibility, leaving those, at the other extreme,which required a more solid and effective systemization and treatment.Those which, by their geography and time-space relevance, seemedcredible were thoroughly explored and included in the documentation andthis appendix.There remains a large, diffuse stain of supposed sightings and localizations– some receiving notable emphasis, such as those in Belgium and Morocco– which had few, vague, discordant, incompatible or incongruent elements,which deserved a treatment with a view towards their infirmação or setaside for the future, should solid elements arise, which all are hereinincluded;Appendix VI 1 – Information/Lists of Suspects of Sexual Crimes –where you will find a detailed reviews, from the perspective of thepossibility of encountering correlations with suspects with sexual motives;Appendix VI 2 – Diligences and Exploration of Information relatedto the aforementioned – in which, in conformity with that alreadyexpressed and in order to provide a better consultation, were gathered theinformation collected about residents in the surrounding areas – temporaryand permanent – as well as a listing of local crime (break-ins and others)and crimes of a sexual nature. The information provided came to this Policeby individual knowledge, through British authorities or by other sources;Appendix VII - Letters Rogatory – outlining the diligences performed,at the request of the Portuguese judiciary, in foreign countries;12Appendix VIII – Transportation, Movement and Location ofSightings – in this appendix are collected and analyzed the informationrelated to possible means of transportation/flight, by land means (road—trains), sea and air. Also explored were information related to the deliveryof photographs from individuals in the area for holidays and obtained bythe Police, along with various hotel chains, whose examinations yieldednothing useful;Appendix IX – Juridic ActionsIn addition, and in spite of its irrelevance, there were meanwhile added 22“dossiers” with notifications of a speculative or clearly incredible nature,such as psychic visions or divinations, which will not be included with thedocumentation, but which you will find carefully organized, in theeventuality that they may need to be consulted in the future.* * ** DEVELOPMENT *The present documentation originated from a process elaborated by thisPolice, having received notice of the disappearance of a minor of British13nationality of three years of age. The occurrence was communicated by theGNR at 00h10 on 4 May 2007.According to that police force, the disappearance would have occurred at22H40 (later on it was verified that the detection and the subsequent alarmof the same, in reality happened, between 22H00 and 22H10 of the day 3 ofMay of 2007, in one of the apartments of the tourist resort ‘Ocean Club’,located at Vila da Luz, Lagos, where a family composed by a couple and 3children under aged were staying.Topologically, the apartment is composed by two bedrooms, a kitchen, aliving room and a bathroom, with easy access to the street, from the boththe front and the back, where there is a small balcony and a sliding door.At the time of the disappearance, the children were alone in the apartment.However the couple, during dinner, went two times to the same, one ofthose times being the one where the mother (KATE) noticed that her oldestdaughter was no longer there alerting all for that fact.Aware of this fact, the police squad went to the place, to initiate the relevantinvestigative steps, at that moment.Immediately they proceeded with the identifications of the progenitors,GERALD MCCANN and KATE HEALY, as well as of the disappeared minor,MADELEINE BETH MCCANN, born on the 12 of May of 2003, in the UnitedKingdom. Besides MADELEINE the couple has two more children, twins, withtwo years old, at the time of the facts, who were also staying in the same14bedroom from where the child disappeared.Informally, GERALD MCCANN said that he was on the resort since the 28 ofApril 2007, on vacation, for a period of time corresponding to a week. Theday after their arrival, 29/05/07, they started doing their meals at the‘Ocean Club’ restaurant, which is distanced a few meters away from theapartment, with the company of three other couples, who had also travelledwith them.Specifically to what is relative to the day 3, he alleged that:- they woke up around 07H30, had breakfast in the apartment, goingout at around 09H00;- soon after, they left their children at the nursery, until 12H30;- around 14H30, after lunch, they put their children back at thenursery, this time until 17H00;- at 17H30 they did the children’s hygiene, and settle them in theirrespective beds by 19H30, all in the same bedroom;- at 20H30, the couple went out to the restaurant;- at 21H05/21H15 the father went to check the children, noticing thatall was normal, the window and the blinds were closed, however thedoor to the room seemed more opened than when he had left;15- at around 9.20 p.m., a friend from the group, JANE TANNER, whenheading for her apartment, noticed an individual who carried a child inhis arms, walking down the road. She described him as aged 30 to 40,with dark hair and wearing light coloured trousers;- at 9.30 p.m., it was the time for another friend, MATTHEWOLDFIELD, to go to the MCCANNS’ apartment to check on thechildren, but he only saw the twins, given the fact that he did notenter the room. In order to see MADELEINE’S bed, he would have togo inside. He detected nothing out of the ordinary;- at around 10 p.m., when KATE went to the apartment she verifiedthat MADELEINE had disappeared, and that the window and shuttersof the bedroom were open.Apart from that, and according to what was established within theinvestigation in the meantime, the witness MATTHEW OLDFIELD assumesthat, at around 8.55 p.m., he went near the outside of the window of thebedroom where MADELEINE was sleeping – a window that was closed – inorder to verify if there was any noise in the inside that might indicate thatthe child was not asleep. He heard nothing, therefore concluding thateverything was well.Due to its relevance, on that very night the Maintenance Director, SILVIABAPTISTA, was asked for a list of the resort’s guests and the check outs onthe 3rd, as well as the identification of the crèche workers, where thechildren stayed during the day.16It should be emphasized that the entire apartment had been searched andrummaged by an undetermined number of people, with the contaminationthat it brings and the difficulty that it raises for the collection of residues.On that very night, the surroundings of the apartment, and Vila da Luzitself, were intensely searched through, both by the GNR members and bymembers of the public.Concerning that and other searches on subsequent days, the proof is givenby the report that was written by the GNR from pages 3491-a to 3525-a,with the latter being a cartographic remission. The same procedure wasmade by the Maritime Police, according to the report from pages 3867 until3885.On page 06 the air registration of the luggage pertaining to the MCCANNfamily was appended, as well as the passport that belongs to the missingminor.From pages 12 to 23, we can observe the photographic coverage of thelocation of the facts, which were collected on that night, as well as a layoutof the apartment.On page 26 the report that was written by the GNR can be found, on page30 the photograph of the minor that was given by the parents, taken froma memory card and revealed on a printer that belongs to one of thenannies, as will be seen further on, and the press communication, on pages33-B.It should be pointed out, in terms of the media knowledge and divulgation,that witness RACHEL MAMPILLY, at around 2 a.m. on the morning of the174th, assumes to have contacted the official British television BBC, throughsomeone that she knew, reporting the disappearance and asking for it tobe broadcast.First thing in the morning on 4 May, and already within the framework ofheavy media coverage, an interview of the entire group took place, pages34-83, interrogations which were repeated later.From pages 86 to 118, there are included details relative to the identity ofthe nannies (CATRIONA BAKER and STACEY PORTZ) and all the officialsof the establishment, with the two that dealt with the MCCANN childrenbeing heard informally; nothing unusual having been reported by them,they were formally interviewed again later.In subsequent days, with the participation of over a hundred researchersfrom the PJ, the enormous collection of diverse notifications about thedisappearance was reviewed, having been already completed innumerablecontacts resulting from the ongoing processing of information.The collection of notifications was transmitted by a wide variety of sources,coming to the PJ by various means, requiring the installation of apermanent police post within the Luz village.The result of such efforts is found in the documentation and the variousappendices, having been spent thousands of hours of work in itscompletion.It should be noted, also, the receipt of an enormous quantity of fantastical18notifications, devoid of any credibility, which forced the research intoconstant and considerable clarification efforts, all the more important as itwas known that time was of the utmost importance in the fundamentalgoal of finding the missing girl.* * *Resuming the factual description, it is noteworthy that from pages 119 andforward, the witness JEREMY WILKINS, affirmed that he saw an individualwith a strange appearance and behaviour. This was eventually confirmed tobe a guest, who participated in the searches, page 124.From pages 127 and following, relates the the sighting of a child, with a facesimilar to MADELEINE's, in a gas station. When the images from the gasstation were shown to the parents, they peremptorily affirmed that they didnot represent their daughter.On page 134, is reported a situation, once again resulting from physicalsimilarities with MADELEINE, later verified as not being the child. Inaddition, an attempt was made to locate an individual referred for sexualabuse of minors, later coming to verify that at the relevant time period, hewas no longer in Portugal.19There was a inquest to DENISE BERYL ASHTON, pgs. 136, which reportedthe presence of two individuals, who she could not identify or recognize,which, alleged that they were conducting a petitioning in behalf of achildren’s institution, which would be fraudulent. Despite that this situationtook place on the day 03 May, we could not relate it with the disappearanceof the British minor, nor the description corresponds to the sketchwidespread in the media by the press officer of the MCCANN couple, issuethat will be addressed next .From the Pgs. 140 to 144, it was reported an alleged sighting of the minor,which, after several diligences, was proved, again, to be another child.A witness, DEREK FLACK, heard at page 200, reported the presence of asuspect, who was allegedly looking at the target apartment, near a whitetruck, pages 145 and following pages. It was not possible to identify thisperson, despite having been made a portrait-robot, page 205. However, webelieve there are very strong possibilities of being construction workers –who were there making small works - a gardener (pgs. 973), orBARRINGTON NORTON (pgs 833), inquired at page 704. The latter is aregular of Praia da Luz, engaged in the activity of musician on the streets ofthe town. Nothing was found relevant to the investigation.From the page 161 to 197, NUNO JESUS, reported a situation connectedwith his daughter, with clear similarities with Madeleine, which was thevictim of an alleged attempt to kidnap (qualified by himself) by a Polishcouple, whose registration of the hire car and used in national territory, heprovided to the police. They were approached when going back to theirnative country, nothing was detected that could incriminate them, pages 21420to 216. The car and the place where they had enjoyed their holidays wasanalysed in a laboratory, but once again without incriminating resultsIt was near the report at page 148, where it’s described the approach doortodoor taken in 443 houses, all of them in Praia da Luz, which isdemonstrative of the gigantic work that would be carried out. Such approachincluded the physical entrance, with the agreement of the inhabitants, inmany just to verify completely the eventual presence of traces of the minordisappeared.LANCE PURSE, inquired at page 208, did equally a sketch of an individual,page 210, which possessed similar characteristics similar to the one relatedby another witness, who also didn’t identify himself.At pages 211 and 212, it is reported another occurrence relative to anindividual referenced for sexual abuse of minors, who, after the approach ofthe same, nothing of relevance was brought to the present investigation.“Mutatis mutandis”, [literally "changes changed", from Latin, in this instancesomeone who changes constantly of mood], relative to a guest from thefemale gender, who revealed a odd behaviour, but with no vector ofcorrelation to the disappearance of MADELEINE MCCANN.At page 220 the hearings of the resort employees started, from therenothing resulted as being relevant or useful for the investigation at course.From the hearings there were no elements collected which allowed to followany line of investigation.21Inquired Mark Warner employees: -----22232425Also several G.N.R. Military, belonging to various areas, patrols andbinomials (sic) were heard in declarations - list of names26In the path of the diligences of localization, it was requested the entryregistrar of the Marina de Lagos, place who does not have a system tocollect images, usually called by CCTV, page 290.27Information was also collected that the road known as A22, usually knownas “Via Infante de Sagres”, does not have images available either, tomatch the period of time that would be of interest.Diligences were carried out to try to locate and discover the routines ofindividuals that are related to criminal practices of a sexual nature, pages293 to 300, 448 to 451, 452 and 453; nothing was discovered that couldbe characterized as relevant.From pages 309 to 311, and because it could be important, we mentionedthe only register of a repair that was carried out in the apartment that wasused by the MCCANN family, without major relevance.* * *The situation concerning the first suspect, ROBERT MURAT, will now beapproached, thus following a line of the succession of the facts, withoutprejudice of returning to the description of occurrences further ahead.A few days after the facts took place, suspicions were raised concerning anindividual that resides approximately 100/150 metres away fromapartment 5A, identified as ROBERT JAMES QUERIOL EVELEIGHMURAT.These suspicions arose initially due to the formulation by a Britishjournalist, who found the special commitment and curiosity of MURAT inthis case to be strange, which had reminded her of another [case] that had28taken place in the United Kingdom with similar outlines and where theguilty persons had actively participated in searches.The reasons for said suspicion are duly listed within the information that iscontained in the process, on pages 308, 328, 442, 461, 957, 960, 961 and986 to 1000, being certain that they ended up being reinforced, some timelater, by elements of the holiday group that asserted, contrary to whatMURAT said, that he had participated in the searches on the evening ofthe disappearance.In an initial phase, before the investigation was deepened, this individualgathered the conditions to be pointed out as a suspect. The conditions thatare intrinsic to his suspect status, can be analysed, as stated before, onthe routine reports that were mentioned above.In order to confirm or dismiss the suspicions about ROBERT MURAT,searches and telephone surveillance were requested, pages 995 to 1013,both on the suspect and on the individuals with whom he directly orindirectly interacted, namely with whom he met almost daily andmaintained telephone contacts.Despite the exhaustive and methodical investigation into MURAT and thepersons close to him, no elements whatsoever were collected to relate himto the crime that was under investigation, and it should be noted thatcontrary to what witnesses within the group stated concerning hishypothetical participation in the searches on the night of thedisappearance, other witnesses (like SILVIA BAPTISTA and elements ofthe GNR) asserted that they had not seen him during those diligences.29Beyond the communication interceptions and forensic exams of thecomputers belonging to them, which pointed to nothing useful, severalsearches were also performed in the suspect’s home, as mentioned earlier,with cino-technical assistance and exploration of the subsoil, bothphysically and by technological detection means, which also did not allowfor the collection of exact evidence.Be aware that, in relation to the utilization of very advanced technologicalmeans, in the area of the detection of strange bodies in the subsoil orenclosed [walled in], these were performed specifically by technicians fromAveiro University, using equipment that allowed a detailed search of thearea.This [research] continued in the same way in relationship to all the vehiclesof the group, with no results.The homes and vehicles were examined in great detail by the ScientificPolice Laboratory, without finding any relevant vestiges.The analyses of the telephone and electronic communications (reports inappendix II) and the resultant correlation, had the same results.In the interrogation headquarters, the suspect denied any involvement withthe process. The interviews with all the elements, with personal andprofessional relationships with ROBERT MURAT, also did not deliveranything of value as evidence.30In truth, in the unfolding of the searches, several objects wereapprehended, for later analysis, without having obtained any incriminatingevidence, which you can better observe in Volume V of the documentation,where the processual pieces related to the searches are found.* * *Returning to the sequence of information which has some relevance relatedto finding the minor, there came forth information about the presence of asack [bag] near a cliff in Ponta da Piedade, Lagos, pages 316 to 327, whosecontents revealed nothing of importance.Page 463, reveals information related to an individual who spoke inCastellean, whose involvement was not able to be discovered.Pages 524 to 531, 740 to 749, provide information about supposed sightingsof the minor, all of them disparate amongst themselves.On page 800, the interview with TASMIN MILBURN SILENCE is presented,who saw on two occasions and on several other days, an individualobserving the apartment from which MADELEINE disappeared. A photo-fitwas created based on the witness' indications . . . diligences were performedwhich led to the identification of MICHAEL ANTHONY GREEN, who was thetarget of diverse diligences without incriminatory results, pages 632 to 726of Volume III, Appendix VI. Beyond this individual, there were otherdiligences performed at this level, also without useful results for theinvestigation, as is explained throughout Appendix VI.31Still on Appendix VI, pages 504 and in the following, it was investigated asituation relative to two individuals, NEIL BERRY and RAJINDER BALU(complementary inquests requested in the letter rogatory), specificallyrelative with the first one, whose information was crossed with the aboveaforementioned witness, TASMIN SILENCE, namely to what concerns thephoto-fit, having this one made clear that it was not that same individual.This occurrence was targeted due to an information given by an employee ofthe resort, pages 504 and 505 of the Appendix VI, where a somewhatpeculiar situation was reported, supposedly to do with NEIL BERRY.However, in spite of the diligences done, inclusive in the letter rogatory,nothing was established that connected him to the disappearance of theBritish child.At the pages 801 and the following, an information was worked relative to asighting done by a professional taxi driver.Also relative to the individuals who do this type of professional work andwho have their headquarters in Praia da Luz, page 818, we talked with thembut nothing of relevant for the process was determined.At the pages 820 to 822, an information from the maritime police wasadded, creating several diligences, however had no results.From the page 825 to 830, we added a report of the G.N.R. police action.Nothing of pertinent value was deducted.For the analyses and dismissal of eventual relevant situations, traffic reports32were requested in the places considered of higher interest, page 823,relatively to the days 2, 3 and 4th of May of 2007, and that was object of ahighly detailed analytical report (see Appendix II), though without criminalconclusions.At page 835, a report of a diligence done in a gipsy camp was done, nothinguseful was gathered.At page 848 and following and from pages 856 to 857 a synopsis of theinterrogations done to the resort employees was made.At page 859, it’s related a situation eventually suspicious which leads tonothing of interest for the process.At page 868, an occurrence is reported (about a couple who had anargument, where is mentioned the disappearance of a child), afterinvestigation this did not lead to relevant elements.From page 870 to 883, it was done the reconstitution of the places outsidethe nursery, where the British child and her nanny went.At page 884 and the following, it was added the lophoscopy [study offingerprints] report where only finger traces of KATE HEALY were found,namely on the window’s frame who would have been opened at the time ofthe disappearance, and at page 967, another report describing the sametype of exam, this time without any match, though the diffusion done at anInternational and national level, page 1470. Later on we verified that thattrace wasn’t of author (sic), page 1480.33On pages 886 and following, a typed report can be observed, which waselaborated by the holidaying group after a detailed joint meeting, that recallsthat steps that were made on that evening, describing the facts both in timeand space.On page 993, there is a report listing the apartments that were subject tosearches, with special attention on blocks 4 and 5.On pages 983 and 984, the preservation, for visualization purposes, ofimages from several petrol stations was requested, but nothing out of theordinary was observed, page 3191.On pages 1101 and following, several pieces of information from Interpol arelisted, alerting towards supposed sightings of the minor, in several Europeancountries, but absolutely nothing was found.Diverse information concerning other suspects of crimes of sexual abuse ofminors and paedophilia, page 1246 and following, which, after due analysis,did not contribute with anything of interest for the investigation.On page 1398 there is an answer to the question from page 1400, informingthat there are no other images from the GALP station, apart from those thatwere already delivered.34On page 1592, a divulgation, appealing to the person who on the 3rd ofMay 2007, at around 9.30 p.m., in Praia da Luz, transported a child in hisarms, to identify himself, in order to dismiss the situation that wasnarrated by witness JANE TANNER.Further on this issue, the testimony of MARTIN SMITH was considered,pages 1606 and following, reporting the sighting of an individual carrying achild, in one of the streets that lead to the beach. It was said that the childcould be MADELEINE McCANN, although it was never peremptorilystated. Some time later, the witness alleged that, by its stance, theindividual who carried the child could be GERALD McCANN, which wasconcluded when he saw him descending the stairs from an airplane, pages2871, 3991 and following and 4135 and following. It was established thatat the time that was being mentioned, GERALD McCANN was sitting atthe table, in the Tapas Restaurant.The workers that carried out construction works in Vila da Luz were heard,pages 1650 and 1651, who did not detect anything strange, during theirworks of excavation and placement of plumbing (also see pages 3983 to3987), although they carefully verified, on the day that followed thedisappearance and before they started the works, if there was a bodyhidden next to said works.From pages 1811 to 1827 we appended two lab tests and thecorresponding reports, which turned out to have no evidential interest forthe process.On pages 1846 and following, a situation of fraud was reported, concerning35misleading and fraudulent information relating to the whereabouts ofMADELEINE McCANN. This individual, who was the author of the fraud,was detained, and confessed to know nothing about the facts, afterdetailed and pertinent diligences were carried out by the authorities of theNetherlands, within the frame of a Rogatory Letter. The main report, whichcomprises the diligences that were requested and carried out by the DutchPolice can be found in the corresponding appendix.On page 1897, a Spanish journalist was heard, who was to haveinformation about the alleged abductor. Once again, nothing was suppliedthat allowed for the substantiation of such suspicions.An attempt was made to obtain identification elements from users ofcomputer equipment in two establishments in Luz, which was not possible,as explained on page 1900.On page 2006 and forward, is found the report of an identical occurance toone that had happened in Holland, coming to be found to pertain to, onceagain, untrue information about the child. With the prestigiouscollaboration of the Spanish authorities, Grupo de Sequestros de Madrid, itwas possible to identify the couple responsible for the false information,with only the male being detained under the auspices of an outstandingdetention mandate.* * *36Now the question related to the performance of the British dogs will becovered, along with the consequent quality assumed by the parents ofMADELEINE, once again with the ability to revisit the description later inthe report.In this way, from pages 1989 and following, one can read the full report byMARK HARRISON, whose specialty is the search for missing people orhomicide victims, including catastrophe scenarios. He provided the use ofcanines, specialized in the detection of vestiges of human blood and humancadaver odor.This is an inspection technique commonly used in the United Kingdom,frequently with positive results, consisting of the utilization of two especiallytrained dogs.One of the dogs is trained to detect cadaver odor and the other to detectvestiges of human blood, with existing knowledge that their prior usage hadresulted in significant results, principally in the detection of vestiges, whichhad then been, later, confirmed in the laboratory.After a positive joint meeting with the British police, it was decided to usethis capability and a large number of objects and locations were examined,with these diligences being recorded in films which are included in thedocumentation (appendix III).In some of these locations and objects, the animals exhibited the behaviourof identification and “signaling”, including:371 - Apartment 5A, of the resort ‘Ocean Club’, place from where thechild disappeared.- cadaver odour dog:*in the couple’s bedroom, in a corner, close to the wardrobe;*in the living room, behind the sofa, close to the lateral window of theapartment;- blood dog:* in the living room, behind the sofa, close to the lateral window of theapartment (exactly as it was signalled by the cadaver odour dog);2 – Area of the backyard, close to the apartment 5A:- cadaver odour dog:* in a flowerbed, commented by the dog handler the lightness of the scentdetected;3 – Apartments where the rest of the elements of the group stayed* NOTHING was detected by any of the dogs;4 – House of the MCCANNs at the date of the inspection [secondapartment]* NOTHING at the house, was detected by any of the dogs;385 - In the area of Vila da Luz* NOTHING was detected by any of the dogs;6 – In the clothes and belongings of the Family MCCANN- cadaver odour dog:* in two pieces of clothing belonging to KATE HEALY* in a piece of clothing of the minor MADELEINE* in the plush toy, possibly belonging to MADELEINE (it was detectedcadaver odour, when the plush was inside the residence – at the dateoccupied by the family)7 – In the vehicle used by the MCCANN family- cadaver odour dog:* signalled the key of the vehicle;- blood dog:* signalled the key of the vehicle;* signalled the interior of the vehicle’s boot;8 – In the vehicle used by a friend of the family, who stayed in thesame resort, matching some of the holiday days.39* NOTHING was detected by either dog;9. In all the vehicles that were used by arguido ROBERT MURAT andpersons that are close to him;* NOTHING was detected by either dog.(in a total of ten vehicles, the cadaver odour dog and the blood odour dogonly signaled the vehicle that belonged to the MCCANN family, which wasrented on the 27th of May)On the locations and the pieces that were marked and signaled by the blooddog, forensics tests were performed, especially at a reputed Britishlaboratory (Forensic Science Service – check Appendixes I and VII – FSSFinal Report) but also, some of them at the reputed National Institute ofForensics Medicine (check Appendix I), whose final results did notcorroborate the canine markings, which is to say, cellular material wascollected that was not identified as pertaining to anyone specific, and it wasnot even possible to determine the quality of that material (v.g. whether itcould be blood or another type of bodily fluid).But during a first scientific approach (pages 2617 and following), thepossibility of a match between the DNA profile of MADELEINE and some ofthe collected residues (among which those that existed in the Renault Scenicthat had been rented by the McCANN couple were abundant) was raised; amatch which, as can be verified in the aforementioned final report from theFSS, failed to be verified, after the execution of long and complex testing.40On pages 2461 and following, the translation of the comments that weremade by the dog handler, during the inspection actions, was appended.Based on the action of the canine team and the aforementioned initialscientific approach, which revealed the possibility of the existence of acadaver inside the apartment and in the vehicle that was used by theMCCANN family, and in order to allow for GERALD McCANN and KATEHEALY to see their position within the process safeguarded, they were madearguidos, in face of the mere possibility of their involvement with thepossible cadaver. During the questioning as arguidos, they denied anyresponsibility in the disappearance of their daughter.It may be questioned that KATE HEALY was not immediately made anarguida, but rather inquired, as a witness, and only afterwards, followingsaid inquirition, did she assume that quality.Therefore, the constitution of KATE HEALY as an arguida was made whenshe was confronted with concrete elements that might lead to herincrimination, a fact that, within the terms of the penal process law, wouldofficiously force that constitution.Returning to the description of the pieces of the process, on page 2294,there is a note of the delivery of four (04) photographs, which were printedby an employee of the resort, AMY TIERNEY.41Page 4193, she clarified that the photographs were made on her ownprinter, which allowed her to use photographic paper and cut to size(10x15), which in this way, reduced any suspicion related to her possession,on the part of the parents.Nonetheless, before her interview, the photographs were examined, asrelated on pages 4155 and following, and pages 4197, in which it is allegedto not be possible to determine with complete confidence if the printer iscompatible with the photographs, but it seems to us, by the laboratoryresults (merely indicative) that these photographs were printed there.On pages 2305, 3195 and 3212 is the detailed report, relative to thelaboratory exams done on the apartment from where the disappearanceoccurred, which took place on 4 May 2007.On page 2327, is the report of the exams of the home and some of thevehicles of ROBERT MURAT and, on page 2348, the report of the exam ofthe car belonging to SERGEY MALINKA, an individual of interest given hisrelationship with ROBERT MURAT, not having been uncovered, however,anything of a criminal nature.On pages 2360 to 2371, is the report of the vehicles belonging to LUÌSANTÒNIO, with whom, also, ROBERT MURAT had an acquaintance.Nothing suspicious was found.On page 2383, is the report of the exam done in the apartment retained bythe Polish couple and, on page 3230, the detailed report of the exams doneon the vehicle rented by the McCANN couple.42All of these exams, for now, allowed nothing to be inferred relative to theexact understanding of the facts.On page 2396, is a file, which was attributed an inquiry number, whichalludes to a supposed sighting. This occurrence was duly discarded, afterseveral diligences, outlined from pages 2739 to 2762.On page 2412, is the interview with PAMELA FENN, who relates severaldetails, of which, though not clarifying the facts, are elucidating. PAMELAFENN lives on the first floor of the residential block, above the apartmentoccupied by the McCANN family. She related that, on 1 May 2007, two daysbefore the disappearance, at about 22h30, she heard a child crying, whichby the sound was MADELEINE. The child continued weeping for one hourand 15 minutes, until the parent’s arrival (she heard the door sounds), atabout 23h45. This witness places in cause the allegation (by the parents) ofthe daily routine of visits every 30 minutes to check the children who hadbeen left on their own.She also added to the files, that her niece, CAROLE, on the morning of 3May 2007, had seen an individual observing the child’s apartment. Thisindividual was not identified, but could have been a gardener. An interviewwith CAROLE was requested in the Letter Rogatory submitted to the UKauthorities, with nothing relevant having been discovered.43On pages 2426 and following, the forensics report was attached,concerning the residues that were collected on several locations, withresults that did not attain the desired purpose, which was to establishelements that conducted to the author or authors of the facts.From pages 2771 to 2869, the final report was added, concerning theaction of the canines and the searches, carried out by the British experts.A new occurrence was explored on pages 2876 and following, concerning acrematorium, where according to the press, the cadaver of the Britishminor could have been placed. The crematorium was closed and sealed,according to what is explained in the aforementioned report.On page 2897, the copies of the contract for the vehicle that was rented bythe McCANN family were requested, and added from pages 2900 to 2937,as well as the registers from anterior rentals, including the last user, whowas heard on page 2997.On page 2945 and following, some situations concerning movements bythe McCANN couple and episodes involving the press and privatedetectives are reported.On page 2962, the holiday group’s flight data is added, in its entirety.On pages 3148 and following, the sighting of an individual with a strangebehaviour, though not substantially founded, who sometimes wasmotionless and other times spoke on the phone from a cabin, is mentioned.44That individual, according to witness statements from pages 3150 to 3156,had some similarities with the figure that was described by JANETANNER, page 3157. Nothing was established that could relate him to thefacts.All the garbage bins that exist in the Vila da Luz and surroundings, in atotal number of 188 (one hundred and eighty eight), were searched andinspected, yet nothing relevant was found, page 3183.According to what is documented in the process, on the afternoon of the3rd of May, the group, with the exception of the McCANN family, were in abar next to the beach, named “Paraíso”, and the images from the videosurveillance system were appended, pages 3266 to 3273, which did notsupply any further clarifying elements.On pages 3893 and following, several inquiritions that came from theBritish Authorities, and the corresponding translations, were added, with aninformative character.On pages 3922 and 3923, a summary of the financial situation of thegroup, constituted by nine persons, can be found.On page 3924, due to the tight connection with the McCANN couple, thepriest who practises in Praia da Luz, Father JOSÉ PACHECO, wasquestioned, but did not add anything relevant for the investigation to theprocess.On pages 3928 and following, another summary of the sequence of events,45executed by the holiday group, was added.The report on page 3998 and the inquirition on page 3459-a refers to twotelephone communications that were received on the night of the facts byKATE HEALY, from a bar that is located in Vilamoura. It was possible toverify that it was a common friend/client between both.In the same perspective that motivated the appending of the registries ofusers of the vehicle that was rented by the couple, the appending of theregister of occupants of apartment G5A was carried out, page 3417-a.The wife of the Anglican Priest, SUSAN HUBARD, was questioned, as shehad a relationship of some proximity to the McCANN couple, during theirstay in Portugal. Once again, nothing that can be reputed as important wascollected.On page 3418-a YVONE MARTIN was questioned, who offered someinformation, which, despite its pertinence, did not show any relevance,pages 3421-a and following.Information was collected from a Spanish detective agency, named“Método 3”, which was hired by a British citizen, to benefit the McCANNcouple. This contact was solicitated by this agency, and the informationthat was given was subject to analysis and dismissal by this Police, pages3434-a and following. It revealed itself, all of it, as speculative and withoutfundament, focusing particular attention on ROBERT MURAT.From the tests and inspections that were carried out, a biological residue46was collected which supposedly carried identificative value. Faced with this,the same residue was sent to Interpol, in order to be compared with thecompatible databases, page 3467-a.Following the aforementioned canine action, after the constitution and thequestioning under arguido status of GERALD McCANN and KATE HEALY,these would end up abandoning the national territory, returning to theUnited Kingdom, where the remaining elements of the group already were.From this moment on, it became necessary to request from the Britishauthorities the performance of a set of diligences, that had the purpose ofhelping to clarify the facts and to establish what type of crime had beencommitted, as well as the responsibility of the corresponding authorship,pages 3528-a and following.Therefore, from page 3705-a to page 3792-a the Rogatory Letter isappended, that was elaborated by the Public Ministry, based on what hadbeen reported by the Polícia Judiciária, and from page 3795-a to page3822-a, a second rogatory letter, this time elaborated the solicitation ofarguidos GERALD McCANN and KATE HEALY.From pages 3928 until 3931 the statements from a witness, who helpedduring the searches for the child and who decided to give a voluntarystatement, were appended. It did not point out anything of substantialrelevance.From pages 3932 to 3937, another witness alleged that she had seenGERALD McCANN, in Avenida Descobrimentos, in Lagos, near an ATM47terminal, at around 2.26 p.m. on the 7th of May 2007. According to thewitness, the father of the minor was talking on the phone, saying “don’thurt Madeleine, please”. She was not peremptory in affirming that it wasGERALD McCANN. It seems unlikely to us that it was GERALD, given thefact that on that day, he only activated antennas in Praia da Luz, adding tothe fact that, at around 2.16 p.m., he activated an antenna in the centre ofPraia da Luz, which we consider to make it impossible that he was presentin Lagos ten minutes later.On pages 3943 and forward, is the request for a comparison of the DNA forMADELEINE McCANN, with the genetic profile of a child’s cadaver foundon the coast of the USA, victim of a homicide. It was verified that theywere incompatible.From page 3948 to 3964 an intercalar report was elaborated, giving anaccount of the diligences meanwhile performed and the results obtained, aswell as explanations of the same.* * *Now in an advanced phase of the investigation, pages 3965 to 4113, therearises, related to the private investigation developed by the McCANNcouple, and publicly announced by their spokesman, CLARENCEMITCHELL, the alleged existence of a suspect, which, supposedly, wasundertaking a collection in Praia da Luz, at the time of the disappearance.A fotofit was created of this individual by a witness – GAIL COOPER – whosaw him, page 3979.48From the beginning and immediately, this was compared with the photo-fitfrom JANE TANNER, and despite hers not having a face, page 3977, shealleged they were the same person, with an approximately 80% certainty.In order to assess the credibility of the description and of the drawing, it isimportant to highlight that the witness GAIL COOPER, was heard for thefirst time and in a very detailed fashion [emphasis in the report], by theBritish authorities (see page 3982), then affirming that she saw this persononly one time , in a collection done at the door of the residence she wasoccupying during her holidays.However, a few months later, in a new deposition, the same witnessaffirms that she saw this individual three times (one of which he waswatching, in a strange way, the children at the Paraíso Restaurant), duringher stay in Luz, information which she did not supply at the time of herfirst deposition to the police in the UK.With the publication of this portrait, a myriad notices about sightings of thisindividual arose, most from the UK, but also from Portugal (see pages4130).All of this information received due treatment and evaluation in regards tocredibility, of which nothing has come until now, in spite of innumerablepersons approached, supposedly of similar appearance with the “suspect.”49Apart from other investigative actions, said persons were photographedand their mobile phones crossed with the antennas that were activated inVila da Luz, during the period that is comprehended between the 2nd andthe 4th of May 2007, without any connection resulting from it.On page 4116, a situation that was related to an individual who had beenreferenced for sexual abuse of minors was explored, whose inquiry wasunder process in this Department. There was no information whatsoeverconcerning his involvement in the present investigation, yet, as it referredto a sexual crime against minors, several diligences were carried out,whose result, for this case, was fruitless.On pages 4147 and following, an information was received, and duly takencare of, concerning a new supposed sighting of MADELEINE McCANN. Itwas once again verified that it was a child that resembled her.On pages 4163 to 4165, the situation that involved the abduction andmurder of a minor of gipsy ethnicity, in the city of Huelva, Spain, wasconsidered and duly correlated with the disappearance of MADELEINEMcCANN. After several contacts were established with the investigationthat was ongoing in the neighbouring country, it was concluded that theoccurrences are disparate among themselves.From pages 4167 to 4182, the forensics report from the National Institutefor Forensic Medicine was appended, whose conclusions do not allow forsignificant advances in the investigation, but which identify severaldifferent haplotypes, some of which match intervenients in the process andothers without any identificative value.50Immediately, the question concerning the differentiating value of somehaplotypes [haplotype (Greek haploos = single) is a combination of allelesat multiple loci that are transmitted together on the same chromosome]was raised, namely concerning JANE TANNER, page 4175, which waslocated in a residence in Burgau, which, in our understanding, would not beviable and logical, or to say the least, would be very strange. Therefore, inorder to clarify this situation, a clarification was requested from thatInstitute, pages 4320 and following, which, in its reply, is peremptory instating that there are haplotypes that are identical among each other, in apercentage that is still significant, pages 4325 to 4328. This means thatthe hair that was found inside that residence, while possessing the samehaplotype as JANE TANNER, belongs to someone else.Still within the area of collection, treatment and analysis of residues, theidentification of a stain on the cover of one of the beds in MADELEINE’sbedroom (not the one she slept in), which raised some suspicions, shouldbe pointed out.Duly analysed, the stain configured a biological residue (saliva) thatbelonged to a child – CHARLIE GORDON – that had been on holidays,earlier and with his parents, in the same apartment.On pages 4200 and following and pages 4204 to 4212, two events werereported, which once again, were subject to treatment, and theirimportance to the ongoing investigation was immediately dismissed.* * *51Summarising the diligences that are reported in the process and that werecarried out or coordinated by the PJ, the following should be mentioned:- de factum preservation of the location (despite the fact that it hadalready been rummaged by countless persons), several collectionsand exams on the existence of possible residues, as well as acircumstantiated photographic report;- installation, within the first 24 hours, of an extensive operationalscheme, including the participation of several police forces and civilprotection services, in a total of over 130 elements;- reinforcement, within the next 24 hours, of said operationalscheme, with the mobilization of over 300 elements from policeforces and public entities;- the operational mechanism that was implemented on the terrainincluded, among others, and as soon as possible, the installation ofposts to control the roads and the southern terrestrial frontier withSpain, the usage of canine detection teams, the usage of exceptionalsearch and rescue means– aerial, terrestrial and maritime -, alerts and broadcasts all over thecountry and abroad. Just as an example, it is mentioned that duringthe following weeks and in permanence, two helicopters, four shipsand several off-road vehicles were used, apart from airplanes andprivate ships;52- in the same manner, the investigative operations were coordinatedwith the specific search operations, and hundreds of diligences werecarried out, like the identification and hearing – both formally andinformally – of citizens, the execution of door-to-door searches in theresidences and tourist resorts of Vila da Luz and surrounding areas,the identification and search of vehicles, and searches on the terrain,in an area that was initially of 15 square kilometers, and then wasprogressively enlarged until 30 square kilometers (where specialattention was given to locations like wells, passages, tunnels, damsand lakes);The magnitude of this operation exceeded, right from the first moment, thedimension that is commonly used in similar cases, a fact that was madepublic, having been notoriously and widely publicized by the media.On the following days, over 700 persons that might possess any relevantinformation about the disappearance were formally and informallyquestioned, the PJ having used, for that task, over 100 employees fromseveral departments in Portimão, Faro and Lisbon, which worked on aconsecutive basis of 24 hours per day.Equally, all the locations where images that could be related to the casemight exist, were consulted (like, for example, restaurants and petrolstations) and telephone lines from the permanent services of thedepartments in Faro and Portimão were made available, and a mobilepolice post was installed in Vila da Luz for the collection of information.53Beyond the already mentioned identifications and domiciliary door-to-doorsearches, the identification, contact and interview with known suspects inthe area that had previously been connected to sexual criminality overminors was carried out.Also, regarding the missing child’s parents, the PJ was careful to scheduleperiodic meetings with them and to designate an Official Liaison to thefamily as support for a permanent relationship, with the accompanimentand active collaboration of the Royal British Consulate in Portimão.Shortly after the beginning of the investigation, continuous relationshipswere created with the Leicestershire Constabulary which sent, in support,various of their members to Portugal, having, equally, the PJ sendingemployees to the UK.It is emphasized, specifically, that the level of cooperation and ofunderstanding between the PJ and the Leicestershire Constabularyachieved, always, very high levels, united in the common pursuit of themissing child and the truth.As such, the Portuguese authorities engaged an enormous and expensivepanoply of technical and human resources, in the attempt to discover themissing child and the understanding of the explanation of thedisappearance.The PJ never disregarded any information or credible elements – as will beseen in this criminal process – that could have led to the realization of thedisappearance, and there have been completed, during these months,54more than 2000 diligences, formal and informal, in this regard.As an example, we refer to the international cooperation, especially withSpain, the Netherlands and the UK which led to the detention andidentification of individuals who tried to introduce deceptive informationabout the hypothetical destination or location of the child.All of the information with any major or minor level of credibility wasexplored, nationally and internationally, by the PJ, with special relevancegiven to dozens of supposed sightings or localizations of the child, most ofwhich, in fact, were widely publicized in the press.The PJ, as in probably no other investigation in Portugal, withheld no effort,in the sense of providing exceptional technical means, manpower andfinancing towards the discovery of the child and the determination of thetruth of the facts, having been completely accompanied in this effort by theLeicestershire Constabulary, the police department headquartered in thecity of Leicestershire, from where most of the elements of the holidaygroup are from.As another example, just the scientific exams alone cost many tens ofthousands of euros.Addressing now, and specifically, the question relative to the diligenceknown as the “reconstitution of the facts” (Article 150º of the Penal ProcessCode), which was not performed due to the refusal of some of the integralmembers of the holiday group to return to our country (as documented in55the Inquiry), the same would have clarified, duly and in the location of thedisappearance, the following extremely important details, amongst others:. The physical, real and effective, proximity between JANE TANNER,GERALD McCANN and JEREMY WILKINS, at the moment whenthe former passed them, and which coincided with the sighting of thesupposed suspect, carrying a child. It results, from ourunderstanding, as unusual that neither GERALD McCANN norJEREMY WILKINS did not see her, nor the alleged abductor, despitethe small dimensions of the space;. The situation that concerns the window of the bedroom whereMADELEINE slept, together with the twins, which was open,according to KATE. It would be necessary to clarify whether therewas a draft, due to the fact that movement of the curtains andpressure under the bedroom door are mentioned, which wouldeventually be clarified through the reconstitution.. The establishing of a timeline and of the effective checking of theminors that were left alone inside the apartments, given the factthat, believing that said checking was as tight as the witnesses andthe arguidos describe it, it would be, to say the least, very difficultthat the conditions were reunited for the introduction of an abductorin the residence and the posterior exit of said individual, with thechild, namely through a window with little space. It is added that thesupposed abductor could only pass that window holding the minor ina different position (vertical) from the one that was visualized bywitness JANE TANNER (horizontal).56. What happened during the time lapse between 5.30 p.m. (the timeat which MADELEINE was seen for the last time by a person thatdiffers from her parents or siblings) and the time at which thedisappearance is reported by KATE HEALY (at around 10 p.m.).Concerning the result of the diligences that were requested from the Britishauthorities, as earlier mentioned, despite the fact that they were almostcompletely carried out, nothing new was added to the process and,consequentially, to the investigation.The questioning of the holiday group merely corroborated what had alreadybeen established during the investigation, without any detail that couldhave been reputed as especially relevant being brought forward.In conclusion, it results from everything that has been done, despite theefforts that were made and all investigation lines being explored, that it isnot possible to obtain a solid and objective conclusion about what reallyhappened that night, and about the present location of the missing minor.On the other hand, it should be referred that this investigation moved itselfunder conditions of exceptional media exposure, with the publication ofmany “news” of imprecise, inexact or even false contents, which did nothelp, in the least, the discovery of the truth and created, many times, aclimate of unusual commotion and of lack of serenity.Therefore, as we do not envision, at the present moment, the execution of57any other diligence within the process that might produce any useful resultfor the process, I submit it to your consideration, for you to determinewhatever you may see as convenient.* * C O N C L U S I O N * *Portimão, 20th of June 2008

What Did Happen to Madeleine McCann

Professor David Barclay, Prominent Forensic Investigator told Martin Brunt of Sky News:There are two options:1) She came to harm at the hands of friends or familyor2) She was taken by a passing paedophileHe went on.. both are really unlikely, but we know she is gone

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AGAINST US, DID YOU HEAR THAT?

WHERE WERE YOU MUMMY/NASTY BLOGGERS

HOW TO POST

Click on one of date archive tabs to the right (the little diamond things) and a list of posts will come up under that date i.e. click 2011 then click July, then click on the post you want to read, this will put the post and all the comments on the main page. Then scroll to the bottom and click add a comment.

If the post is on the main page, just click on the heading and it will bring up comments under that post, again, just click add a comment at the bottom.

Don't have nightmares

THE MCCANNS TOOTHY AND DELIGHTED GRIN

AS THEY PROMOTE THEIR MONEY PEDDLING MADDIE BOOK JUNE 2011 NEVER TOO LATE FOR A GOOD CASHIN

From the Portuguese Police File - seen by a witness loitering with intent....

What a great e-fit Gerry

WHOOPS GERRY'S MASK SLIPPED

HE FOUND IT AGAIN..GERRY THE EVANGELIST

WITH A BEATIFIC GRIN OUTSIDE THE WHITEHOUSE SOFTLY HUMMING "WE'RE IN THE MONEY" C. July 2007 when dreams and fantasies were at their zenith

12.5.07 ECSTATIC ON MADDIES BIRTHDAY AS TENS OF THOUSANDS ROLL IN .... £260 PER HOUR

THE SAME DATE THE FUND WAS CREATED, YES MADDIE'S BIRTHDAY

.After a single dose of COCAINE there may be enlarged (dilated) pupils & pale cool skin...

and here is another one

a dead ringer for Gerry's mate Russell O'Brien, Missing from the table when Maddie went missing No wonder the McCanns wanted to release another load of e-fitups

Nanday enjoys wrecking my plant

but I love him!

LAST IMAGE OF MADELEINE ACCORDING TO KATE MCCANN TAKEN ON THE MORNING OF TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007

THAT NIGHT MADDIE WAS SOBBING PITIFULLY DADDY DADDY, TWO NIGHTS LATER THEY REPORT HER MISSINGTemperature at the time only about 17-20, so how come that "sunburn"? Is it fake suntan cream hiding bruising to her arm but they could not be bothered to do her legs. Notice the pure white hand, very odd! Even more odd, why feature the red dress picture, made up and aged about two and ignore this genuine last pic? This couple even lied and said she only answers to Madeleine when know she actually answers to Maddie. Who believes they actually want her to be "found"?

My view in Brief..and the best post to this blog IMO

Viv, regarding Mrs Fenn on the night Madeleine was crying for over an hour, which stopped when she heard the parents return. As we have said before, could someone have been leaving, but could someone have been leaving with Madeleine. Perhaps Madeleine was drugged, which would account for the crying to stop suddenly, and removed.

This blog does not pursue any agenda, I do not pretend to be Pro or Anti McCann and I most certainly do not sell books or ask anyone for cash, it is just my search for the truth the way I see it and an answer to all the lies and spin we have to endure on this case - often pure and deliberate rubbish that is written by many on blogs and forums to mask the truth brainswash people to believe the unbelievable and of course, cashin.

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence the McCanns were involved in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, but there is no satisfactory evidence that confirms she died in the apartment. As the Portuguese Prosecutor has just pointed out, they could have been charged with kidnapping and trafficking Madeleine. Goncalo Amaral has behaved in an unconventional way for an ex police officer to expose Kate and Gerry McCann and there is no doubt that as parents, there is something incredibly unconventional about them!

People see what Gerry McCann wants them to see, but which cannot be proved against him, it is his mirage to feed his Fund. Maybe a few police officers, early to the case, also saw it his way. But what he, his friends and his wife really did will be their undoing.

Justice for Maddie, The Twins and all exploited and abused little children whether they are dead or alive.

Detailed procedures on how UK investigate Complex Child Abuse Cases

Followers

Search This Blog

SCARY HUH!

Too much pupil Gez...

ANOTHER LUDICROUS GAFF

It is true that we have requested a meeting with the prime minister to show him the strength of our case, to explain Kate and Gerry's innocence and yet all we've been offered is a medium-level-consular meeting, which we rejected.