Comments On: New San Francisco archbishop was Prop 8 architect
by Dan Schreiberhttp://archives.sfexaminer.com/sanfrancisco/new-san-francisco-archbishop-was-prop-8-architect/Content?oid=2201964
Comments On: New San Francisco archbishop was Prop 8 architect
by Dan Schreiberen-usCopyright 2016 The San Francisco Examiner. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The San Francisco Examiner readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The San Francisco Examiner.support-sfexaminer@desert.net (The San Francisco Examiner Webmaster)Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:01 -0800Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:15:00 -0800Foundationhttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
Posted by
gg]]>
Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:34:38 -0800The San Francisco Examiner
Posted by
SexyMamaSF]]>
Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:11:14 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
Posted by
Geri]]>
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:41:25 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
@proud_bay_man: In its infancy? Do you mean like in the book of Genesis?

Posted by
Geri]]>
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:39:18 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
Posted by
Toddpearsonsf]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:06:05 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
@Phil E: Please do your homework next time so another classmate does not have to embarrass you in front of the entire class. Passes dunce cap. Homework for next week: educate yourself on the word marriage and it's lack of the institution of religion in it's infancy.

Posted by
proudbayman]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:44:17 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
Posted by
proudbayman]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:41:20 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
@Inis_Magrath: The label is precisely whatâs causing anunnecessary conflict, as far as the objections to gay marriage are concerned. Proponentsof 8 are objecting to gay marriage generally speaking, on religious grounds,which is the issue.
Posted by
Phil E]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:47:47 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
@Phil E: The word marriage is not a religious term, it is a civil law designation of a legal status. This is not a fight over a "label."
Posted by
Inis_Magrath]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:22:11 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
to constitute a religious term on the grounds that itâs specified by theirreligious tenets, I think they should be welcome to it so long as that isseparate from state enforcement. The fight for the label, "marriage" isproblematic for both sides for many, with (many, not necessarily all) proponentsof 8 being guilty of special pleading with regard to church and state, iedemanding state enforcement of a law on religious grounds and (many) opponentsbeing overly concerned with labels rather than equality.
Posted by
Phil E]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:27:03 -0700The San Francisco Examiner
Posted by
google-0fc90b08e6ec02dd3bd4733dd46756f0]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:15:48 -0700The San Francisco Examiner