I'm new here and could really use your help. I've just inherited this sword from my father who purchased it in a small antique shop in England. He was told it's a medieval broad sword. I can't find any identifying marks or stamps so I'm really not sure how to tell if this is true.

It's quite heavy and would require two hands to use it in a battle, it measures 47" in total length and has a 38" blade.

I've included some photos and can post more if you like, any info or advice is greatly appreciated.

I remember the last time I went to Toronto with my family and on the same day we visited the Royal Ontario museum we had dinner at the Medieval Times dinner and tournament show. While we waited in line I looked around the lobby and it was decorated wall-to-wall with swords of this EXACT model. I saw them later in the gift shop and asked if they sold them but unfortunatly they said no as sopposedly they capped their goods at $500 and that model was valued higher and were bought in mass by the show owner.

Hey even though its an early wall hanger its a decent quality one and in my opinion one of the most attractive models as well , not a bad purchase to say the least just hopefully your father didnt spend to much thinking it was an original or anything like that.

Below is a pic of a sword that I assume is the original the models are based from but im not honestly to sure as it doesnt really look like a genuine medieval/rennaisance sword to begin with but hey I could be wrong.Attachment: 14.28 KB

Below is a pic of a sword that I assume is the original the models are based from but im not honestly to sure as it doesnt really look like a genuine medieval/rennaisance sword to begin with but hey I could be wrong.

Below is a pic of a sword that I assume is the original the models are based from but im not honestly to sure as it doesnt really look like a genuine medieval/rennaisance sword to begin with but hey I could be wrong.

Not that long ago, these were the three most commonly reproduced supposedly medieval swords (and might still be). That these ones were done so often is I think due to Spain having been the world capital of replica medieval swords at the time. From left to right, these are Tizona and Colada, traditionally attributed to El Cid, but of doubtful authenticity (this Tizona is not to be confused with the also commonly reproduced Tizona cup-hilted rapier). The third, the starting this thread, is supposedly a sword of Charles V (or Carlos V); I don't know about the authenticity of the original.

Searching Google or Google Images will bring up very many different versions of these. Once you see how common these are as reproduction swords, you won't wonder why some people will pronounce them as modern replicas instantly on sight. The "original" Tizona sold for a sizable sum, and is unique, so you're not likely to see it in an antique store. Nor the other originals. If it looks like these, it's certainly a replica.

Another common one is a sword that's sold as the sword of Alfonso X or San Fernando / Saint Ferdinand / Ferdinand III. (There is/was a famous sword of Ferdinand III, but it's different (see here).)

In these days, with lots of non-Spanish swords and post-Braveheart, the Wallace sword, or rather, what is sold as the Wallace sword, is a common replica. The usual replica isn't a replica of the "original" Wallace sword, but iirc Deepeeka does a genuine Wallace replica.

Many of these replicas are the most dire sort of wallhanger - soft zinc alloy fittings, poorly welded on thin rat-tail tangs, etc., and some (but not very many) are better made."In addition to being efficient, all pole arms were quite nice to look at." - Cherney Berg, A hideous history of weapons, Collier 1963.

Yes its true the swords featured in the pic above are reproductions, the famous reproductions of El Tizona and Colada swords, along with the charles V sword. In hindsight it was kinda silly of me to think the Charles sword in the pic could possibly have been original while the others were not.

It makes me wonder, were's the original Charles V sword? If the original El Tizona was unique, does the Charles V sword even resemble its own reproduction? Food for thought and a question that probably should be asked on its own thread I soppose.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum