'Effective-Schools' Efforts Taking Root in the States

Although the "effective-schools" movement is a relatively recent
phenomenon, virtually all 50 states have developed school-improvement
strategies that are consistent with elements of that research, a new
survey by the Education Commission of the States (ecs) has found.

The survey was conducted in May and June of 1982 by Allan Odden and
Van Dougherty, researchers with the nonprofit, Denver-based consortium.
(See Databank this page.) They drew also on an earlier study of the
same topic, conducted by the Rand Corporation.

In their report, "State Programs of School Improvement: A 50-State
Survey," the researchers identified seven broad areas in which many
states had created programs, most within the last five years:

Improving the skills and training of teachers, administrators, and
other members of the "education workforce";

Creating new statewide curricula that focus on basic skills but
cover other academic topics as well;

Developing new school-accreditation standards;

Creating broad school-improvement programs, sometimes by identifying
successful schools and using them as models;

Developing new tests for students and new ways to use the test
results; and

Involving parents and community members in public education.

The efforts range from comprehensive, multifaceted approaches to
narrower, highly specific programs. California, Colorado, and
Connecticut, for example, have started programs in all seven areas;
Delaware, Maryland, Missouri, and Pennsylvania also have relatively
wide-ranging programs.

Other states, such as New Mexico, have focused on testing both
students and teachers. Mississippi and several other states have chosen
to work through improved accreditation systems, the researchers
report.

Although markedly diverse, many states' efforts have common themes,
the researchers found. And, they note, the three general
characteristics that apply to most states' programs are consonant with
the "effective-schools" research carried out in the 1970's.

First, schools, rather than individual classrooms or entire
districts, are the "unit of education improvement," according to the
survey. Second, many state programs require clear academic goals that
focus on basic skills. Local curricula are then shaped to match the
goals.

And finally, many programs involve collecting data on students'
achievement over time. These longitudinal data are used to identify
students' weaknesses and to modify curricula.

Although diverse in content and design, the school-improvement
programs have similar origins, according to the researchers. Demands by
the public for better education, they say, probably constituted the key
impetus. As an outgrowth of these "accountability pressures," 38 states
have created minimum-competency tests for students, according to the
survey.

But the improvement efforts seem also to be secondary effects of
other changes that occurred during the 1970's, the researchers suggest.
The "years of debate and policy analysis related to school-finance
reform" strengthened many state agencies' capacity for policy analysis
in general, according to the report.

"The next logical question after the enacting of expensive
school-finance reforms was the payoff to the state in terms of better
education quality," the researchers write. "Policy initiatives related
to education improvement often followed."

The exigencies of administering complex federal and state programs,
many of which were initiated within the last 10 years, may also be a
factor in the development of the school-improvement plans.
Administrators have grown more sophisticated and now deal with issues
of program quality as well as with the fiscal and administrative
aspects of the programs, according to the survey.

The report (No. 182-3) is available for $3 from the Publications
Desk, Education Commission of the States, Suite 300, 1860 Lincoln St.,
Denver, Colo. 80295.--sw

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.