Friday, 30 November 2012

KKKanada is proving that they can stand on their own as world class imperialists and bullies, and do not need to take the lead of assholes like the u.s.a. The recent vote on Palestinian "statehood" is a case in point. This country's government is one of nine to vote against the Palestinians, with 138 voting in favour. Of course, if the Tibetans were to make the same type of move, the canadian government would greet it with enthusiasm. But I guess you have to have some simpleton former cia dupe pretending to be wiser than the rest like the dalai fucking lama, to get canada's support. Meanwhile, the "democratic" governments of the world bray and bark on and on about human rights, but still want to take advantage of the giant sweatshop known as china. Fucking hypocrites and assholes. No doubt there will be liberal douchebags crying on and on about the "embarrassment" this is to fucking kkkanada, but it's actually not embarrassing. The government does not represent me, but the ruling class of rich motherfuckers and multinational corporations that control this, and every country. Fuck them. Good bye.

A majority of countries on Thursday voted in favour of the Palestinian Authority's bid to have its status in the UN upgraded to state recognition.

The Palestinian Authority is now a non-member observer state. It was previously a non-member observer. The new status will allow it access to some UN international agencies and to sign treaties.

“Sixty-five years ago on this day, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 181, which partitioned the land of historic Palestine into two states and became the birth certificate for Israel," said Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president. He was greeted by the General Assembly with standing applause and uncharacteristic whistling.

“The United Nations General Assembly is called upon today to issue a birth certificate of the reality of the state of Palestine.”

Canada, U.S. vocally oppose vote

Only nine countries voted against the Palestinian Authority's bid to have its status in the UN upgraded to state recognition.(CBC News)

Canada voted against the bid, along with the U.S. and Israel.

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird was in New Yorkto oppose the move by the Palestinians to have their status upgraded in the UN, and presented Canada's concerns directly before the world body.

“We cannot support an initiative that we are firmly convinced will undermine the objective of reaching a comprehensive, lasting and just settlement for both sides. It is for these reasons that Canada is voting against this resolution," said Baird. "We will be considering all available next steps.”

There has been speculation that Canada will ask the Palestinian delegation in Ottawa to leave or not renew its $300 million in aid to the Palestinian Authority over five years.

Deepak Obhrai, Baird's parliamentary secretary, said Canada has not made any decisions about its future interactions with the Palestinian Authority.

"Whatever decision we take will be a very responsible decision," he said. "Our goal is to achieve peace in the region."

Paul Dewar, the NDP's foreign affairs critic, said he was deeply disappointed with Canada's vote.

A Palestinian man shouts slogans during a Thursday rally in the West Bank city of Ramallah after the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly decided to upgrade the Palestinian Authority's observer status.(Marko Djurica/Reuters)

"[Baird] left us with this veiled threat for the Palestinians," he said. "And the question for the Conservatives is: how is that going to advance peace?"

NDP leader Tom Mulcair said his party supported the Palestinian Authority's request for enhanced status within the UN.

"We understand that if we want the peace process to move forward, we’ve got to start seeing concrete steps like this one," he said.

Canada's vote was expected by the NDP as Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said Canada favours a two-state solution in the region.

"That will not be accomplished in reality unless and until the Palestinian Authority returns to the negotiating table and is able to get a comprehensive peace agreement with Israel.… So we encourage them to do that and we will not support any other shortcuts or any other ways of trying to arrive at that solution without such a peace agreement," he told reporters on Wednesday.

The U.S. also voted against the bid, and Ambassador Susan Rice, the country's permanent UN representative, tweeted shortly after the vote: "Today's unfortunate & counterproductive resolution places further obstacles in the path to peace."

In her explanation of her country's position, Rice said, "Long after the votes have been cast, long after the speeches have been forgotten, it is the Palestinians and the Israelis who must still talk to each other and listen to each other and find a way to live side by side in the land they share."

Vote 'won't change anything,' Israel says

While people in the West Bank celebrated and Palestine's chief negotiator called Palestine a country under Israeli occupation, Israel said the UN vote does not change anything.

"Regrettably, it won’t serve the cause of negotiations," said Jonathan Peled, an Israeli government spokesman. "And it sends the wrong message … It sets unnecessary illusionary aspirations for the Palestinians as it won’t change anything on the ground.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday the UN General Assembly's recognition of an independent state of Palestine will not advance the Palestinians' quest for a homeland.(Gali Tibbon/Associated Press)

Peled said despite 138 countries voting in favour of granting Palestinians non-member observer state status, “there is a growing understanding … there is no other alternative than for direct negotiations."

Some of the nations that voted for the motion echoed Peled's belief in their explanations of their vote.

"We look upon this resolution as an appeal for the resumption of direct negotiations and as the keystone supporting a two-state solution, whose prospects are fading," read Switzerland's explanation.

Prior to the vote, the Palestinians said they need UN recognition of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem to be able to resume negotiations with Israel.

The non-member observer state status could also open the way for possible war crimes charges against Israel at the International Criminal Court. The U.S. and Israel have both threatened retaliation if the Palestinian Authority pursues that approach.

With files from the CBC's Tom Parry, David Common and The Associated Press

Tuesday, 27 November 2012

Canadian Aid Money Supports Mining Companies in Developing Countries

(Ottawa, November 8, 2012) Mining critics are calling yesterday’s parliamentary committee report on the use of Canadian aid money to support mining companies’ interests in developing countries “ a wholesale handover of CIDA to the private sector.”

The report, by the Conservative majority House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, proposes to reconfigure CIDA to better serve Canadian corporations as they go abroad, starting with the mining sector.

The report prioritizes public-private partnerships, such as controversial projects with multi-million dollar mining companies that are already being piloted in countries such as Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Peru, as an “important tool of [CIDA’s] development programming.”

“This committee report doesn’t just tie Canadian aid to mining interests, it would actually restructure CIDA to better serve the interests of the corporate sector,” says MiningWatch spokesperson Catherine Coumans. “Aid money is meant to address poverty, not to promote the commercial interests of Canadian mining companies. Nor should it subsidize the obligations of mining companies to provide benefits to affected residents and rehabilitate damaged environments.”

In addition to CIDA partnerships with mining companies, the committee recommends:

• that CIDA consider offering loans and utilizing “other financial instruments” to support corporations,• the promotion of revolving door exchanges between CIDA and the private sector to enhance the agency’s ability to serve Canadian corporate interests, and• that CIDA engage in changing institutions, regulations, policies, and democratic oversight in developing countries to foster Canadian investment, particularly “in developing countries with significant natural resource sectors.”

Where CIDA has already been providing technical support on mining law and adminstrative reforms in other countries, its track record has been to weaken state controls, privatize state industry, and reduce royalties, taxes, and other measures to capture economic benefits in order to attract foreign investment.

“Rather than directing resources and political pressure towards stripping down the legal framework in other countries, the Canadian government should oblige Canadian mining companies operating overseas to meet strong environmental and human rights standards, including respect for free prior and informed consent,” says Coumans. “The government should also ensure that people who have been harmed through the activities of a Canadian company have access to justice in Canadian courts.”