Will leave the comments for you all if you wish on these recorded documents from public records.

NOTE: It appears these were done by pro se individuals.

YOUMUSTCONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY.

REPEAT:

DO NOT try this without consulting an attorney.

Excerpt:

WHEREAS TRUSTOR/GRANTOR STATES AND DECLARES that, in recognition of certain pertinent facts not limited to the fact that the Mortgage contained NO SIGNATURES showing an acceptance of the document by any other party, the above-described Mortgage is, at best, an unconscionable contract and, for that reason alone, said, Mortgage is not an enforceable instrument; and since no other party signed th document, no party would have standing to assert that said party has been damaged in any way, or that a “default” occurred, or that a “breach” occurred; AND…

Folks! If this is a patriot, pro se, sovereign “stab” at trying to create a dissolution of agency between MERS and the actual mortgagee, you are likely to find the ire of the judge in your jurisdiction when this all plays out. It may also have a lot to do with whether a judge regards a quiet title action as having any merit because of this recordation. Believe me, it will be used against you in court! Consult an attorney before taking some idea like this and running with it.

I’ve been tempted to find out what would happen if I added my name to a copy of the stamped blank note assignment, as it was sent with the note after my QWR. I want to fill in the blank, copy it again and present it in court to remind the judge how easy it is to mislead about being the noteholder when a copy is used. I have a LOT of money in my home already, the foreclosing bank has none. Yet it can take my home on a COPY of the note and alleged assignment, despite mountains of evidence of fraudulent paperwork regarding assignments. On my alleged assignment there is no date, nor an address or other identifying personal information of the person signing for the previous lender.

Why are judges not REQUIRING the original notes and assignments since knowing that the banks’ attorneys got caught falsifying these documents, committing fraud on the court? Copies should be allowed only if proof of destruction by natural disaster. Seems to me that would help prevent massive case backlog.

Are the “do overs” making it through the second time around?

If I were a judge, they wouldn’t get a flash of time in my court if they deemed it okay to come back later and try to fix the fraud.