Im starting to have my doubts about Rock vs Cena 2. The whole build up to Rock vs Cena was "once in a lifetime". This would go against everything they promoted it as. "Twice in a lifetime" doesnt quite sound as catchy does it?

Todays WWE mentioning something they said almost a year ago? They'll act like they never said once in a lifetime and go straight to the phrase Swagger used. THE BIGGEST REMATCH IN HISTORY!

"....or...you can just call me the soon to be crowned KING of this company!
DEAN AMBROSE is taking over the world! As of right now forget what you think you know about this industry,
because Dean Ambrose is about to blow the DOORS. OFF. EVERYTHING! SO WELCOME TO THE FUTURE!!!!"

I know but it would be pretty stupid. I, for one, would not be as excited to see Rock vs Cena 2 as I was Rock vs Cena 1. It just seems stupid to have the same match at the same PPV 2 years in a row. I know Austin vs Rock had 3 (I think), but they were the hottest feud at the time. Nowadays Rock barely shows up. There would be less time to build up to the match.

And to take away more excitement, it would be pretty obvious that Cena wins.

I know but it would be pretty stupid. I, for one, would not be as excited to see Rock vs Cena 2 as I was Rock vs Cena 1. It just seems stupid to have the same match at the same PPV 2 years in a row. I know Austin vs Rock had 3 (I think), but they were the hottest feud at the time. Nowadays Rock barely shows up. There would be less time to build up to the match.

And to take away more excitement, it would be pretty obvious that Cena wins.

yeah, it would be like HHH VS Taker for the third time. I feel a majority don't want to see it, especially if the outcome is not what they want it to be, you know...DAT HEEL TURN.

Oh yeah I never even thought of that. A Cena heel turn would make it interesting (although it would still be the same Rock vs Cena at the end of the day). What about Punk? Don't you think there is any chance that there will be a triple-threat? Rock vs Cena vs Punk ... that is a match worth watching.

Oh yeah I never even thought of that. A Cena heel turn would make it interesting (although it would still be the same Rock vs Cena at the end of the day). What about Punk? Don't you think there is any chance that there will be a triple-threat? Rock vs Cena vs Punk ... that is a match worth watching.

Oh for sure, because other than Ryback, I have no clue who Punk would be occupied with come Mania if he doesn't have the belt.

Ryback will be involved big in some way at Wrestlemania, perhaps with Punk for the belt? Hopefully he's up against Big Show or something or Sheamus and not involved with any of the big guys. I'd love Austin/Punk at 29, but it's a money match and I don't think WWE would be stupid enough to put it on the same card as Rock vs. Whoever.

I'm think if it is Rock/Brock and Taker/Cena, maybe they can have Punk/Sheamus for the WWE Title. Ryback would enter the World Title picture and I'm not sure who he should face. Show won't be World Champion that long imo. Ryback/Ziggler might be sort of a repeat of Sheamus/Bryan feud from WM28. If Triple H returns he's going to be in one of the big matches (I hope not with Lesnar), so maybe he faces Punk. So much can change in the early months of 2013 and we probably will not know what's going down for sure until the Raw after Elimination Chamber in February.