... [John F.] Kennedy placed the
limitation of the nuclear arms race at the center of American foreign
policy. . . . Israel's nuclear enterprise was in direct contradiction
with the principles of his policy.... The correspondent for Ha'aretz in
Washington during the Kennedy and Johnson presidencies, Amos Elon, filed
a report saying that in a background talk with James Reston of The New
York Times, Kennedy had said that in nuclear matters [Israeli Prime
Minister David] Ben-Gurion was a "wild man."

—Israeli historian Michael Karpin The Bomb in the Basement: How Israel Went Nuclear and What That Means for the World (in Michael Collins Piper's The Golem)

The murder of American President John F.
Kennedy-brought to an abrupt end the massive pressure being applied by
the U.S. administration on the government of Israel to discontinue the
nuclear program. [In Israel and the Bomb, Avner] Cohen demonstrates at
length the pressures applied by Kennedy on Ben-Gurion ... in which
Kennedy makes it quite clear to the Israeli prime minister that he will
under no circumstances agree to Israel becoming a nuclear state. The
book implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether
Israel would today have a nuclear option.

"The Letters of John F. Kennedy",
by Martin Sandler | Historian Martin Sandler presents a collection of
President John F. Kennedy's personal correspondences. The letters
include Kennedy's private notes and political communiques, from letters
sent to his parents from boarding school to secret missives to Soviet
premier Nikita Khrushchev during the Cold War. Martin Sandler speaks at
the John F. Kennedy Museum in Hyannis, Massachusetts. Buy the author's
book from: Amazon | Barnes And Noble | Indiebound

I'll
tell you one thing: I found articles - not tripped in publications but
in very sophisticated publications - saying, "Forget Lyndon Johnson,
forget the CIA, forget Fidel Castro---Mossad killed JFK because they
were upset by what he had done to Ben-Gurion." So you see, we drop a few
bombs like this in this book, unproven ...(Historian Martin W. Sandler, Author of The Letters of John F. Kennedy, lecture at the JFK Museum; Nov 16, 2013, CSPAN2 | BookTV @51 min : 21 sec)

----Excerpts from the last few pages of the book mentioning Israeli nukes (p.333-341):

In March 1992, Representative Paul Findley of Illinois, wrote in the
Washington Report on Middle Eastern Affairs, “It is interesting. . . .
to notice that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy
assassination, Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned.” Two years later in his book Final Judgment, author Michael Collins Piper actually accused Israel of the crime. Of all the conspiracy theories, it remains one of the most intriguing.

What is indisputable is that, although it was kept out of the eye of
both the Press and the Public, a bitter dispute had developped between
Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion who believed that his nation's
survival depended on it attaining nuclear capability and Kennedy who was
vehemently opposed to it. In May 1963, Kennedy wrote to Ben-Gurion
explaining why he was convinced that Israel's pursuit of nuclear weapons
capability was a serious threat to world peace.

May 18, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister:I welcome your letter of May 12 and am giving it careful study.Meanwhile, I have received from Ambassador Barbour a report of his
conversation with you on May 14 regarding the arrangements for visiting
the Dimona reactor. I should like to add some personal comments on that
subject.I am sure you will agree that there is no more urgent business for the
whole world than the control of nuclear weapons. We both recognized this
when we talked together two years ago, and I emphasized it again when I
met with Mrs. Meir just after Christmas. The dangers in the
proliferation of national nuclear weapons systems are so obvious that I
am sure I need not repeat them here.It is because of our preoccupation with this problem that my Government
has sought to arrange with you for periodic visits to Dimona. When we
spoke together in May 1961 you said that we might make whatever use we
wished of the information resulting from the first visit of American
scientists to Dimona and that you would agree to further visits by
neutrals as well. I had assumed from Mrs. Meir's comment that there
would be no problem between us on this.We are concerned with the disturbing effects on world stability which
would accompany the development of a nuclear weapons capability by
Israel. I cannot imagine that the Arabs would refrain from turning to
the Soviet Union for assistance if Israel were to develop a nuclear
weapons capability--with all the consequences this would hold. But the
problem is much larger than its impact on the Middle East. Development
of a nuclear weapons capability by Israel would almost certainly lead
other larger countries, that have so far refrained from such
development, to feel that they must follow suit.As I made clear in my press conference of May 8, we have a deep
commitment to the security of Israel. In addition this country supports
Israel in a wide variety of other ways which are well known to both of
us. [4-1/2 lines of source text not declassified]I can well appreciate your concern for developments in the UAR. But I
see no present or imminent nuclear threat to Israel from there. I am
assured that our intelligence on this question is good and that the
Egyptians do not presently have any installation comparable to Dimona,
nor any facilities potentially capable of nuclear weapons production.
But, of course, if you have information that would support a contrary
conclusion, I should like to receive it from you through Ambassador
Barbour. We have the capacity to check it.I trust this message will convey the sense of urgency and the
perspective in which I view your Government's early assent to the
proposal first put to you by Ambassador Barbour on April 2.Sincerely,John F. Kennedy

In his reply to Kennedy, Ben-Gurion defended his country's
development of a nuclear reactor for both peaceful and military purposes
and suggested a time when Dimona would be ready for inspection.

Kennedy was far from satisfied with Ben-Gurion's reply, particularily
his attempt to stall any inspection in Dimona. In secret private
conversations with the prime minister and in the following letter,
Kennedy pressured Ben-Gurion for earlier and more frequent inspections
of the nuclear site.

16 june 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister:

I thank you for your letter of May 27 concerning American visits to
Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona. I know your words reflect your most
intense personal consideration of a problem that is not easy for you or
for your Government, as it is not for mine.

I welcome your strong reaffirmation that the Dimona will be devoted
exclusively to peaceful purposes. I also welcome your reaffirmation of
Israel's willingness to permit periodic visits to Dimona.

Because of the crucial importance of this problem, however, I am sure
you will agree that such visits should be of a nature and on a schedule
which will more nearly be in accord with international standards,
thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona
project.

Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of
visits we and you have proposed. If Israel's purposes are to be clear
to the world beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which
would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer,
another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I
am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty
than that which you have proposed. It would be essential, and I take it
that your letter is in accord with this, that our scientists have access
to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex,
such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and
that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.

Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this
matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and
internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will again
have your most sympathetic attention.

Sincerely,

John F. Kennedy

On June 16, 1963, Ben-Gurion, who had been Israel's leader since its
inception in 1948, resigned from his office. Many believed his
resignation was due in great measure to his dispute with Kennedy over
Dimona. In a letter to Ben-Gurion's successor, Levi Eshkol, Kennedy left
no doubt as to what the U.S. response would be if "we were unable to obtain reliable information"
about the intent of the Dimona project, a threat that according to one
conspiracy theory lead to Israel's role in Kennedy's assassination.

July 4, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister:

It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you
assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our
friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that
I am writing you at this time.

You are aware, I am sure, of the exchanges which I had with Prime
Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits to Israel's nuclear
facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May
27. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a
problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for
mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister's strong reaffirmation that
Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the
reaffirmation also of Israel's willingness to permit periodic visits to
Dimona.

I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of
office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates
my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations,
arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion's May 27 letter, as to the nature and
scheduling of such visits.

Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of
visits we and you had proposed. If Israel's purposes are to be clear
beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best
serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another
visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure
that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that
which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be
essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion's letter was in accord
with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona
site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication
facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be
allotted for a thorough examination.

Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this
matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and
internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have
your most sympathetic attention.

Sincerely,

John F. Kennedy

New Book of Kennedy Letters Supports Thesis:JFK Opposed Israel’s Nuclear Aspirations“Threat” in president’s personal correspondence to Israeli leaders cited by respected author
By Richard V. London

Pro-Israel
agitators are in a frenzy. A forth-coming book—the first ever
collection of the late President John F. Kennedy’s correspondence—dares
to suggest the theory that Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad,
played a part in JFK’s assassination “remains one of the most
intriguing” of the many scenarios relating to that crime. The book cites
AFP correspondent Michael Collins Piper’s out-of-print underground
best-seller, Final Judgment, as the source of that allegation.
Entitled
The Letters of John F. Kennedy —and scheduled for November release by
Bloomsbury (a “mainstream” publishing house)—the new 352-page volume was
edited by respected historian and television producer Martin W.
Sandler. Sandler put together this work with the cooperation of the
Kennedy Presidential Library at Harvard. But the tome is already under
attack, even prior to publication.
Having obtained advance copies and
discovering Sandler’s references to Piper’s thesis, influential
pro-Israel propaganda voices—such as National Review (founded by ex-CIA
operative William F. Buckley Jr.) and The Washington Free Beacon, edited
by the son-in-law of neoconservative power broker William
Kristol—promptly launched an Internet cannonade savaging Sandler and
Piper.
Here’s what was considered so outrageous: In the final chapter
of the book—after noting the multiple theories surrounding JFK’s
death—Sandler reprinted nine pages of undeniably contentious
correspondence between JFK and Israeli Prime Ministers David Ben-Gurion
and Levi Eshkol, pointing out that JFK was convinced, in Sandler’s
words, “that Israel’s pursuit of nuclear weapons capability was a
serious threat to world peace.”
As if highlighting these little-known
letters were not enough, Sandler inflamed Israel’s partisans by his
candid introduction to that selection of letters, writing:

In March 1992, Rep. Paul Findley of Illinois wrote in The Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs, “It is interesting [to note] that in all
the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel’s
intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned.” Two years
later in his book
According to author Martin W. Sandler, Israel’s
Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion (left) and Prime Minister John F.
Kennedy were at bitter ends over Israel’s desire to develop a nuclear
arsenal of mass destruction. Final Judgment author Michael Collins
[Piper] actually accused Israel of the crime. Of all the conspiracy
theories, it remains one of the most intriguing.
What is indisputable
is that although it was kept out of the eye of both the press and the
public, a bitter dispute had developed between Israeli Prime Minister
David Ben-Gurion, who believed that his nation’s survival depended on
its attaining nuclear arms capability, and Kennedy, who was vehemently
opposed to it.

Noting that Ben-Gurion quit his post
in what Sandler notes “many believed . . . was due in great measure to
his dispute with Kennedy,” Sandler reprints a July 4, 1963 letter to
Levi Eshkol (Ben Gurion’s successor) in which JFK warns American
“commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized” if
the United States felt it was being denied “reliable information on a
subject as vital to peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the
nuclear field.”
Sandler comments that this letter from JFK was a
“threat” that “according to one conspiracy theory, led to Israel’s role
in Kennedy’s assassination.”
The book closes several pages later,
reprinting friendly letters to and from Kennedy’s widow in the wake of
JFK’s murder, which—although Sandler doesn’t say this—resulted in a
180-degree turn about in U.S. policy toward Israel, giving Israel the
opportunity to assemble its nuclear arsenal unimpeded.
What makes
this volume so difficult for Israel’s advocates to contend with is that
the editor cannot be dismissed as a “fringe writer” or “conspiracy
theorist.”
A former professor of history at Smith College and at the
University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Sandler is author of some 80
non-fiction books on a wide variety of historical topics, a number of
which were published by the Library of Congress as part of its “Young
People’s American History Series.” A five-time winner of television’s
Emmy award, Sandler was co-creator of the popular “This Was America”
series (with William Shatner) and executive producer of such acclaimed
documentaries as “American Image” (with Hal Holbrook), “American
Treasure” (with Gene Kelly) and “The Entrepreneurs” (with Robert
Mitchum).

Patriots
seem to have reached a “consensus” and decided Lyndon Johnson was the
mastermind of the JFK assassination: LBJ launched the conspiracy and
covered it up, utilizing renegades in the CIA, the military, the FBI and
the Secret Service.

Under
no circumstances—so patriots say—was there involvement by Israel’s
intelligence service, the Mossad. The fact of numerous intimate Mossad
connections (at multiple levels) to the conpiracy—not to mention JFK’s
bitter dispute with Israel over its nuclear weapons program—is not
considered relevant (or ever even referenced).

Now
that my book, Final Judgment—documenting Israeli involvement (alongside
the CIA) in the crime—is out of print, I am able to reflect candidly
upon all of this, since no one can now accuse me of “hawking” my book.

A
forceful proponent of the theme that “LBJ Killed JFK” is Alex Jones,
who loudly touted Barr McClellan’s book Blood, Money and Power, which
actually claims Lee Oswald was one of the gunmen who killed JFK.

(An
AFP reader once called Jones’s radio program and mentioned Final
Judgment, but Jones shouted him down, and Jones’s guest slammed the book
as “anti-Semitic” and to be ignored.)

The response to Final Judgment has been complex and interesting.

A
top Council on Foreign Relations figure—Christopher LeFleur (then U.S.
ambassador to Malaysia)—tried to bribe booksellers in Malaysia not to
distribute Final Judgment (or my other books), but they wouldn’t be
compromised.

A
lot of self-described “white nationalists” rejected the book since they
didn’t like JFK’s racial policies. Others were angry a black
nationalist wrote the introduction to the book.

Some critics of Israel wouldn’t endorse the book because they were afraid of being called “conspiracy theorists.”

A
pro-Arab magazine (quite hostile to Israel) refused to accept
advertising for Final Judgment because, the editor said, it might upset
“those [expletive deleted] defamation groups,” referring to the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an intelligence and propaganda arm of the
Mossad.

For
its part, the ADL orchestrated energetic campaigns to suppress the book
and deployed violent thugs from the Jewish Defense League to disrupt my
speaking engagements and threaten my life.

The
ADL actually said college students were not mature enough to hear my
thesis, although, of course, the ADL did consider those kids old enough
to join the U.S. military and die in wars to ensure Israel’s survival.

JFK
“research” groups denounced me or refused to even mention Final
Judgment, despite the fact it sold far better than some more widely
publicized JFK assassination books.

Deb
Conway from the assassination information group known as JFK Lancer
vowed to join pro-Israel groups in picketing one of my lectures.

Probe’s
Jim DiEugenio—who claims a “WASP plot” was behind JFK’s
death—maliciously misrepresents Final Judgment (perhaps because his
publishers were funded by a family who bankrolled Israel’s nuclear
arsenal).

But
I did get some good endorsements from historian Eustace Mullins,
ex-Pentagon official Col. Donn de Grand Pre, author William Gill,
researcher Brian Quig, Hollywood screenwriter Bill Norton and a powerful
nod from former high-rankng State Department official Herbert L.
Calhoun.

But don’t forget: “LBJ Killed JFK.”

——

Michael
Collins Piper is a world-renowned author, journalist, lecturer and
radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi,
Japan, Canada and, of course, the United States. He is the author of
Final Judgment, The New Jerusalem, The High Priests of War, Dirty
Secrets, My First Days in the White House, The New Babylon, Share
the Wealth: Huey Long vs Wall Street, The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within,
Target: Traficant and The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb.

Dual Loyalty
By Victor Mallet REVIEWS OF TWO BOOKS: The Samson Option: Israel,
America and the Bomb by Seymour Hersh, and Dangerous Liaison: The
Inside Story of the US-Israeli Covert Relationship by Andrew Cockburn
and Leslie Cockburn

A Special Relationship
By David Schoenbaum. Review of DANGEROUS LIAISON The Inside Story of the
U.S.-Israeli Covert Relationship. By Andrew Cockburn and Leslie
Cockburn.

In
Bed With the Israelis? DANGEROUS LIAISON: The Inside Story of the
U.S.-Israeli Covert Relationship, By Andrew and Leslie Cockburn
September 01, 1991 | Dan Raviv | Raviv, a
CBS News correspondent based in London, is co-author of "Every Spy a
Prince: The Complete History of Israel's Intelligence" (Houghton
Mifflin.)

The
truly nauseating thing about this whole issue is that the men of the
LIBERTY who cooperated in writing this book have given their imprimatur
on something which in the end is going to result in their murderers
getting off scott-free. Not coincidentally, the author of this book also penned a work* whereby the assassination of JFK–proven slam dunk to have been an Israeli operation from top to bottom by the irreplaceable Michael Collins Piper in his book Final Judgment–was
actually the handiwork of–drum role please–the same Lyndon Baines
Johnson who is now being blamed for the attack on the LIBERTY.

aanirfan.blogspot.com | From 9/11 to 11/9David Israel has explained the 2016 US Presidential election: From 9/11 to 11/9 - Trump's victory is how Western Civilization regrouped By David Israel for The Jewish Press. David Israel points out: In 1900, things may have seemed peaceful. But by 1914 there was a World War. In 2000, things may have looked peaceful. But people should not have had 'romantic delusions'. On 9/11, there was the attack on the Twin Towers. People had 'to retool for crueller, bloodier times'. On 9/11, 2001, there was 'the unprovoked onslaught of blood thirsty Muslims on one of the cultural jewels of Western society.' Only on 11/9, 2016, with the election of Donald Trump, 'did the West finally get the message, realizing there were dangerous beasts out there that needed to be put down'. The Trump supporters, 'seeing that the traditional political leadership was not prepared to carry out the mission, picked a leader'. In the above analysis, David Israel is giving the game away. The Zionists put Trump into power. We point out the following:

In 1914, an international cabal manipulated public opinion in order to start a war. One of the aims of the cabal was the break up of the Turkish empire and the removal of Palestine from that empire.

VIDEO - BREAKING: Jeff Sessions Confirmed Attorney General
VIDEO - Elizabeth Warren On Why Republicans Attempted To Silence HerXenophobia
in American Politics: The “Know Nothing Party” of the 1850s and the
Trump-Pence Neo-Fascist Republican Agenda for 2017 Le phénomène Trump n'est pas sans rappeler le mouvement
"Know Nothing" américain fin 19e siècle début 20e (je suis évidemment
pas le premier à faire ce lien). Doté
d'un journal et d'un parti, leur ligne était la haine anti-immigrés. On
se souvient de ce parti haineux xénophobe et radicalement
anti-immigration comme d'un parti protestant, anti-catholique
(anti-italien, anti-irlandais) et anti-juif. Mais c'était pas du tout
antijuif en réalité, puisque le juif Lewis Charles Levin (1er juif au
Congrès américain) dirigeait le journal du mouvement en plus d'être l'un
des fondateurs et Leaders du mouvement... Mais pourquoi donc personne
n'en parle? Encore le nom juif, ce nom maudit qui impose la chappe de
plomb! Rien à voir avec la rectitude politique tant décriée par les trumpiens, les soraIiens, les Martineau et les Bock-Côté!https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Charles_Levinhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_Nothing
Lire cet extrait de Piper (The New Babylon, ch 7): When there was a great panic in 1837,
Rothschild agent Belmont negotiated large loans from the Rothschilds
on behalf of the U.S. debtor banks.“ In other words” according to
Birmingham, “he was able, thanks to the hugeness of the Rothschild
reservoir of capital, to start out in America operating his own Federal
Reserve System.” (And this long before the official establishment of
the Federal Reserve System in 1913!) (*)
_________
(*) During this period that there was extensive emigration by Roman
Catholics into the United States—particularly from Ireland—and the
truth is that well-settled Jewish interests saw this as a danger. In
fact, one of the leading bigots in America leading the fight against
immigration into the United States—particularly Irish Catholic
immigration—was a prominent Jewish American, Lewis Charles Levin.
Although history often tells us that the “Know Nothing” movement—the
Native American Party—was “led by Protestants” and “aimed at Catholics
and Jews,” the truth is that Levin—a Jew—was not only one of the
party’s founders but also an editor of its national organ and one of
the first Know Nothing members elected to Congress! In fact, Levin was
the first Jew elected to the U.S. Congress. Yet, Jewish literature
today never mentions Levin’s preeminent role in the anti-Catholic
agitation of America’s early years. Born in 1808 in Charleston, South
Carolina, which—as students of the Jewishcontrolled slave trade
know—was the Jewish population center of the United States for many
years, long before NewYork City emerged as such, Levin later moved
north, as an attorney, to Philadelphia where he published and edited
the Philadelphia Daily Sun. In 1844 he was elected to Congress from
Pennsylvania on the American (“Know Nothing”ticket) and held that post
for three terms until defeated for re-election in 1850. Levin died
ten years later. The fact that Levin was one of the pioneering
anti-Catholic agitators on American soil is interesting, to say the
least, since history books have been careful to “edit” the record as
far as Levin’s role in the Know Nothing movement is concerned. Levin’s
career has been consigned to the Orwellian “Memory Hole.” Instead we
always hear how both “the Protestants” and “the Catholics” have been
so hostile to “the poor Jewish immigrants fleeing persecution.”
_________

(FLASHBACK) Neocons and the truth: Bitter enemies to the end, By Glenn Greenwald Here's Ledeen yesterday, writing in National Review's Corner (h/t sysprog): Time to Attack Iranian Terror Camps? [Michael Ledeen] So says John Bolton, and he's right. As you know, I have been proposing this for years. I always thought it was only a matter of time before we were compelled to take this action, which is a legitimate form of self-defense. And while we're at it, we should do the same thing to the Syrian camps as well. It isn't "sending a message," it's acting to protect our guys by fighting back in the proxy war the mullahs have been waging since 1979. Faster, please?

(RAPPEL)Prêts pour une guerre contre l'Iran diabolisé?Are the Iranian Election Protests Another US Orchestrated ‘Color Revolution’? By Paul Craig Roberts, June 9, 2009 (...) A few days previously, the Telegraph reported on May 16, 2007, that Bush administration neocon warmongerJohn Bolton told the Telegraph that a US military attack on Iran would “be a ‘last option’ after economic sanctions and attempts to foment a popular revolution had failed.”

(FLASHBACK) The boys who cry “Holocaust” The same neocon hawks who lied us into Iraq are using the ultimate argument-stopper to push war with Iran By Gary Kamiya (...) To listen to the neocons and hawks, you’d think Hitler was about to send the tanks over the Polish border. Former U.S. ambassador and Dr. Strangelove impersonator John Bolton said, “The only alternative now is the potential for a pre-emptive military strike against their military program, either by the United States or Israel. Diplomacy has failed. Sanctions have failed.” For Bolton, Iran is the second coming of Nazi Germany: “If the choice is them continuing [towards a nuclear bomb] or the use of force, I think you’re at a Hitler marching into the Rhineland point … We’re still in 1936, but not for long.”

(RAPPEL) 2010: Un nouveau puissant lobby sioniste s'impose
Jose Maria Aznar ---- John Bolton ---- Alejandro Toledo ---- Dore Gold
"Powerful New Lobby Group Set in Motion", by Michael Collins Piper(...)• John Bolton,
former U.S. ambassador to the UN and a key figure in “neo-conservative”
circles including the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs,
founded by the aforementioned Stephen Bryan.

(FLASHBACK) Gingrich: A Likudnik Manchurian Candidate In an important and already “controversial” article in The Daily Beast, Wayne Barrett writes: If elected, Gingrich would be the first American president to emerge from the dark think-tank world born in the Reagan era that gave us the Iraq War and lusts now for an Iranian reprise. A Likudnik version of the Manchurian candidate, Newt has spent much of his post-Congress life in the grasp of warrior colonies like the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), the think tank where he became a senior fellow two months after he stepped down as speaker in 1999, remained until he declared for president last May, and worked at times alongside Dick and Lynne Cheney, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Michael Ledeen, and Paul Wolfowitz, the first Bush battalion to euphemistically land in Baghdad, self-dispatched well before 9/11.

(FLASHBACK) The “very scary” Iranian Terror plot 14 Oct 2011 Iranian Muslims in the Quds Force sending marauding bands of Mexican drug cartel assassins [LOL!!!!!!!!!!!]onto sacred American soil to commit Terrorism — against Saudi Arabia and possibly Israel — is what Bill Kristol and John Bolton would feverishly dream up while dropping acid and madly cackling at the possibility that they could get someone to believe it.

Former Mafia-linked figure describes association with Trump
On the 24th floor of Trump Tower, in an office two floors below Donald
Trump, Felix Sater was trying to revive his career. The Russian-born
businessman had already done a stint in prison for stabbing a man in the
face with the stem of a margarita glass, and he was now awaiting
sentencing for his role in a Mafia-orchestrated stock fraud scheme — all
the while serving as a government informant on the mob and mysterious
matters of national security. But Sater and his business partners had
an idea: They would build Trump towers in U.S. cities and across the
former Soviet bloc. Sater pitched it to Trump, who gave Sater’s company
rights to explore projects in Moscow as well as in Florida and New York.

Real Estate Executive With Hand in Trump Projects Rose From Tangled Past
It is a classic tale of reinvention, American style. Born in the
Soviet Union in 1966, Felix H. Sater immigrated with his family to
Brighton Beach when he was 8 years old. At 24 he was a successful Wall
Street broker, at 27 he was in prison after a bloody bar fight, and at
32 he was accused of conspiring with the Mafia to launder money and
defraud investors.(...) Mr. Sater was born in the Soviet Union, the son
of Rachel and Mikhail Sater, according to public records, court
testimony and the federal indictment. He has said his parents, who are
Jewish, moved first to Israel, then to Baltimore and finally to New York
in the early 1970s to escape “religious persecution.”

The Power Behind Sarah Palin, Michael Collins Piper:
"Perhaps more disturbing was the revelation that the sordid political
operative Dick Morris (...) was a key player in laying the stage for the
until-then-obscure Palin’s introduction to the GOP. Morris was among
another group of neocons—associated with the National Review magazine—who landed in Alaska on their own cruise just shortly after the Kristol-Weekly Standard clique held court. The New Yorker
said that “according to several accounts . . . no connection made that
day was more meaningful than the one struck between Palin and Dick
Morris.” It is interesting the New Yorker should unveil the Palin-Morris connection resulting from the National Review stop-over in Alaska: S.I. Newhouse, publisher of The New Yorker, was a longtime and intimate friend of Morris’s cousin, devout pro-Israel political operative and “mob lawyer” Roy Cohn, who was also a close friend of National Review founder William F. Buckley, Jr. As far back as the mid-1950s—working with Cohn—Buckley
was a godfather of the modern-day neoconservative movement, a
transmogrification of the old-line Trotskyite communists (for strategic
reasons) into a “new” brand of “conservative internationalism” in
opposition to traditional American nationalism."

THE JUDAS GOATS: The Enemy Within, By Michael Collins Piper, p.162-163
What follows is the text (...) of a sworn statement that Hooker
executed on September 30, 1954 outlining his findings about the
role of the self-styled “American Jewish League Against Communism”
and how it was manipulating then Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy’s efforts to
investigate communism in high places in the American system. The
affidavit reads:

(...)
Mr. Marks stated that a lot of Jews called McCarthy an anti-Semite but
little did they know that "he is the best friend the Jews ever had." [Hooker noted of McCarthy that "Eventually they destroyed him anyway when he started calling up Jewish Communists later on."—MCP.] Marks
went on to say that "other investigations might have turned up Jews and
McCarthy had been given credit for them, but that if we traced the
record back, we would find that McCarthy actually did not call up a
single Jew in that period when the heat was on the Jews." He later
qualified these remarks by saying that "while McCarthy was operating as a
temporary subcommittee under the Truman administration, he did not call
up any Jews ; that when he once got himself elected as the chairman of
the permanent investigating committee, in the new administration, he
then began to call witnesses "as they came." [That is, whether the witnesses were "Jewish or not," according to Hooker—MCP.]
Mr, Marks continued: "But that doesn't make much difference now because
he accepted our own men to work right with him. For example, he
accepted as his top man next to him our man

Roy Cohn, left, which was arranged through another of our men, George Sokolsky."
If memory serves me correctly, Marks stated that Julius Kahn was also
their man on the McCarthy committee, but who was now on the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee. He definitely stated that David Schine was
NOT with the AJLAC but that he was put there by "another group which I
don't know about." Mr. Marks went on to say that "not only is McCarthy
under our control but so are Jenner and Velde, who also took our men to
work right with them. Benny Mandel and Robert Morris represent us on the
Jenner Committee." He mentioned Robert Kunzig as "their man" for Velde.
Marks also stated definitely that Professor Louis Budenz was under "their control" and one of "their men," and that he was working to take the "heat" off the Jews. [Budenz was a well-known "ex-communist" who became a leading figure
in the so-called anti-communist movement, key elements of which had come
under the control of the Zionist and Trotskyite elements. Hooker's
revelations explain why—MCP.]

Varied
were the motives of the League’s founding, but one of them was
self-protection. . . . Many of the intellectuals in America were Jewish.
During the New Deal some had achieved high position. Moreover, Karl
Marx himself was the son of a Jew who later became a Christian. To adopt
the sane position, to resist unfair smears and the attempts of bigots
to portray the Jew as pro-red, might only make people mad. Better to go
on the offensive against the Communist menace itself. Such was the
attitude of some Jews—or at least the excuse they offered their
friends—as national hysteria built up in 1948. The possibility of the
anti-Communism attack turning into a persecution of the Jews was very
much on the minds of the government officials charged with prosecuting
the alleged atom bomb spies, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. For that reason
a Jewish judge was chosen, and the prosecuting staff selected to try
the case was composed of Jews. One of their members was Roy Cohn.
More than concern for the Jews was involved in the formation of the
League, however. Anti-Communism offered both political and business
opportunities. The League was formed at the home of Eugene Lyons, a
right-wing author of note.Taking part in the first meeting were other
right-wingers, including Louis Waldman, Lawrence Fertiz, Isaac Don
Levine, and George Sokolsky. The prime mover was Alfred Kohlberg who,
along with Lewis Rosenstiel, supplied most of the funds.

The
unexpected defeat of Dewey in 1948 upset a good many people, and made
it necessary for the American Jewish League Against Communism to revise
its program. It needed a new political figure behind whom it could
rally. Coincidentally, the league had come into possession of a
one-hundred page FBI report on Communist influence on government. The
report was originally leaked to an intelligence officer in the Pentagon
with instructions to pass it on to leaders of the league . . . We have
the word of none other than Roy Cohn that the secret FBI document was read, and conferences held, in New York and Washington. As Cohn put
it, “a small group” took “upon itself the responsibility of getting the
story across to America.” The League decided it should approach a
senator rather than a representative. At a meeting in Washington in
November 1949, a special committee of the league “sifted carefully
through the roster of United States senators for one who might
successfully undertake the task of educating his fellow Americans.” They
narrowed the list down to four possibilities, all Republicans. In turn,
each senator was given a look at the FBI report. Each was urged to go
on the warpath. Each was promised financial support. The first three men
on the list refused. The fourth took the document home and read it
carefully. Next morning he called a member of the League and told him he
was “buying the package.” That fourth senator was Joseph McCarthy.

THE JUDAS GOATS: The Enemy Within, by Michael Collins Piper, p.169
All of this, of course, is not to say that McCarthy was not sincere in
his motives, but he was very clearly being manipulated by forces that
were far beyond his comprehension. And the fact that his chief
“advisor” was the ubiquitous Roy Cohn, who continued to play a
major role as a Zionist “fixer” (at the same time doubling as an
organized crime lawyer) points precisely toward those forces that were
guiding McCarthy toward ultimate destruction.

Les intérêts Rothschild derrière Donald Trump, par Michael Collins Piper
In his memoir, Trump proudly described how in 1987 he bought his first
casino interests when he purchased 93 percent of the voting stock in the
Resorts International (RI) gambling concern. What Trump didn’t say was
that RI was controlled by a clique of sordid, international big-money
elements in alliance with the Jewish crime syndicate which was, in turn,
collaborating with the CIA and Israel’s Mossad in an array of
inter-connected money-laundering operations. The casinos laundered money
for the CIA and the Mossad. In return, these agencies used their
influence to ensure the mob remained protected from interference by law
enforcement.Trump- American Hero Or Zionist Messiah?

Haredim look to Trump as a pro-Israel, traditionalist tough guy — emphasis on ‘guy’
NEW YORK (JTA) — American Jews are likely to vote for Hillary Clinton
in November, but American Jewry’s fastest-growing community is likely to
go the other way. A solid majority of haredi Orthodox Jews will vote
for Donald Trump, say experts and Republican operatives in the haredi
enclave of Borough Park, Brooklyn. While poll data isn’t available on
the fervently Orthodox vote, observers say the haredim are attracted by
Trump’s hawkish foreign policy, pugnacious personality and image as a
successful businessman. It doesn’t hurt that he’s a man. “When you’re
fighting a war, you want someone who’s tough, who’s going to be on your
side,” said Heshy Friedman, a business consultant in Borough Park who
founded the group Jewish Democrats for Trump. “I don’t think he means
things literally. You need somebody who borderlines on going crazy.” The
haredi community in New York City and in the state has supported
Democrats in the past. Both Mayor Bill de Blasio and Gov. Andrew Cuomo
have courted the haredi vote by ensuring social services for the poor
and promising not to intrude in communal affairs. Borough Park’s state
assemblyman, Dov Hikind, is a conservative Democrat. But unlike American
Jews in general, who have overwhelmingly voted Democrat in national
elections for a century, the haredi community has shifted Republican in
the past couple of decades as its numbers have grown, according to
Samuel Heilman, who has studied the community for decades as a
sociologist at Queens College of the City University of New York. The
haredi move rightward parallels a similar move among all American
Orthodox Jews, who include the less insular modern Orthodox community. A
recent poll of Florida Jews found that Orthodox voters there back Trump
by a 3-to-1 margin. “The haredi community clearly leans toward the
Republican Party,” said Hikind, who is undecided in the presidential
election. “Mostly it’s been Republican because of the sense that
Republicans are much closer to Israel, much friendlier to Israel.”
Haredim vote Republican, Heilman said, both to distinguish themselves
from less observant Jews and because they identify with the party’s
social conservatism. (...) Friedman, who also campaigned for Republican
presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, has been making the policy
case for Trump in Borough Park. A flier he posted in synagogues around
the neighborhood lists four reasons to support Trump: opposition to Iran
obtaining a nuclear bomb; support for Israeli West Bank settlement; his
pledge to nominate a conservative Supreme Court justice; and his
opposition to Syrian refugees entering the country. Friedman changed his
license plate to “TRUMP 17” in honor of the candidate’s would-be
inauguration year, and believes there is a “silent majority” of haredi
Jews who are too bashful to voice their support for Trump. He says
support for Trump is especially strong among young haredim, who use the
internet and have access to right-wing websites. “You have a whole new
generation of yeshiva kids who are right wing,” he said. “[Democrats]
are trying to destroy the religious community. These people have an
agenda, and when they start the fight, there’s always a reaction.”

Trump is in bed with certain Russians?
Felix Sater is Russian. Trump's friend Felix Sater launched the Fort
Lauderdale Trump Tower. courthousenews Felix Sater's father "is a
Russian Organized Crime boss." Donald Trump made $90 million dollar
profit on a Palm Beach mansion he sold to Dmitry Rybolovlev who is a
Russian Mobster, who was indicted for rubbing out his chief business
rival in what Russian news agency TASS called a “contract hit.” Donald
was pocketing $90 million of dirty cash from the Russian Mob. Donald
Trump, Dirty Money, and the Filthy Rich in Palm Beach. Giuliani, who
is backing Trump Michael Collins Piper, at American Free Press,
December 2007, writes about ' rudy giuliani godfather of the russian
mob' According to Piper: Giuliani closed down the local, mainly
Italian-American, mafias. This allowed certain foreign mafias to take
over. These foreign mafias were mainly Jewish and mainly from Russia
and Israel. "Several of Trump's businesses outside of Russia are
entangled with Russian financiers inside Putin's circle."

Jews Around the World Drift to the Right
HAARETZ – In his 1989 book “Modernity and the Holocaust,” the
Jewish-Polish sociologist Zygmunt Bauman discussed the extraordinary
role Jews played in the emergence of Western modernity. At the beginning
of the 20th century, the Jews were considered to be the
standard-bearers of revolutionary Bolshevism, but at the same time
representatives of establishment liberal democracy. In economic terms,
the Jew was considered to be socialist and capitalist alike, and also
stirred resentment for belonging to a rootless elite or, alternatively, a
filthy barbarian rabble. This perceived duality was an element in the
rise of modern anti-Semitism. However, according to Bauman, that
situation no longer applies toward the end of the 20th century.[Entretien exclusif] La vision géopolitique d'un identitaire européen
Europe-Israel Au cours de diverses discussions tenues sur le réseau,
il est apparu que la position défendue par tel fervent défenseur de
l’Europe était partagée par des intervenants se présentant comme juifs.
L’un d’eux a suggéré que soit écrit un petit texte à l’intention de ceux
de son entourage. Political correctness harms Jews Op-ed: As long as political correctness prevents journalists and
politicians from reproaching intellectual, communal and religious
leaders for promoting and tolerating anti-Zionist Jew-hatred, Jews will
have their hands tied while being exposed to relentless assaults as
representatives of Zionism.Pro-Trump Group Releases Bizarre ‘Islamic States Of America’ AdTrump Reportedly Considering White House Post For Anti-Muslim Activist Who Called Joseph McCarthy ‘Spot On’How Did Donald Trump Happen?
America has always oscillated between these two tendencies. The
libertinism of the 1960s and 1970s led to the conservatism of Ronald
Reagan. And now the multiculturalism of the President Obama years has
led to the nativism of Donald Trump. The black president is followed by
the racist one. It’s tragic, but it’s not new. Or even surprising.VIDEO - Racists Emboldened By Trump VictoryTrump seeks to calm protests, tells racist supporters to ‘stop it’
In first televised interview after election, president-elect also tries
to reassure his backers on gun rights, abortion, immigration

"The Zionist movement, created by the Jewish big
bourgeoisie at the end of the 19th century, was born with a decidedly
counterrevolutionary purpose. From the founding of the World Zionist
Organization in 1897 to the present, Zionism, as ideology and political
practice, has opposed the world revolutionary process.Zionism
is counterrevolutionary in a global sense in that it acts the world over
against the three major forces of revolution: the socialist community,
the working class movement in capitalist countries and the movement for
national liberation.Zionist counterrevolution began by making
inroads in the European working class movement. In the early years, when
the growth of monopoly capitalism and the expansion of reactionary
tendencies that accompanied the establishment of the imperialist phase
of capitalism demanded the unity and solidarity of the proletariat, the
Zionists focused on dividing the working class.They propagated
the thesis that all non-Jews were, and would always be, anti-Semites;
asserted that the only possibility for the Jewish masses’ well-being and
justice was to emigrate to the “promised land”; and defended class
collaboration, thus diverting the Jewish proletariat away from the
struggle for their real emancipation and dividing and weakening the
working class movement. It’s not fortuitous that in czarist police
archives one finds documents calling for support for the Zionist
movement as a way of stemming the tide of proletarian revolution.Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote at the time in his
diary:“All our youth; all those who are from 20 to 30 years old, will
abandon their obscure socialist tendencies and come over to me.”However, the efforts of Zionist counter-revolution could not hold back
the wheels of history.The victory of the Great October Socialist
Revolution in Russia ushered in a period of transition from capitalism
to socialism on a world scale. The first victory of the proletariat, the
premise of future victories, was a heavy blow to Zionism.Most
of the money that filled Zionist coffers came from Russia, where czarism
had humiliated and oppressed the Jews for centuries. Russia provided a
million immigrants for the Zionist colonization of Palestine. When the
Russian Revolution liquidated the exploitation of man by man, it also
destroyed the basis for Zionism in the Soviet Union.Leninist
policy on the national question toppled all Zionist myths that the Jews
could not be fully incorporated, with equal rights, into society and
destroyed all the racist claims on the inevitability of anti-Semitism.
The Zionists never did, and never will, forgive the Soviet state and its
Leninist Party, not so much for cutting off the money flow from Russia
and for the loss of workers for the colonization effort, but because the
Bolsheviks implemented a correct policy that incorporated the talents
and efforts of the Soviet Jews into the tasks of building a new society
and thus demonstrated the class origins of discrimination and
anti-Semitism, breaking with the past and providing a genuine solution
to the Jewish problem, a solution which was not and could never be a
massive exodus to Palestine.Zionist counterrevolution took on an
anti-Soviet thrust. Before October 1917 the Zionists collaborated with
Kerensky. Later they supported all the attempts at counter-revolution
and enthusiastically participated in the different white “governments”
set up in different parts of the country during the Civil War [in
Russia].They were active in all the moves against the Soviet Union from
abroad, and their powerful propaganda machine spread a spate of lies
about the first workers’ and peasants’ state in the world.Not
even the Soviet victory over German fascism, which saved so many Jewish
lives, made the Zionists change their anti-Soviet stand.With the
outbreak of the cold war the Zionists collaborated in all the
subversive and diversionary activities against the USSR and other
socialist countries. The secret services of the Zionist state of Israel
coordinated their spy activities with the CIA. Zionist agents played an
active role in the counter-revolutionary attempts in Hungary and
Czechoslovakia.Today Zionism seconds the hypocritical
anti-Soviet campaign on presumed violations of the human rights of Jews
in the Soviet Union and does all it can to put pressure on Soviet
citizens of Jewish origin so they will leave their true homeland and go
to Israel.This effort by Zionist counter-revolution can only lead to new
failures. And to complete the picture there is the Zionist
counter-revolutionary action against the national liberation movements.Soon after World War I, Zionist settlers penetrated into Palestinian
territory, acting as the spearhead of British imperialist interests in
opposition to the Arab peoples’ hopes for independence. Their role was
clearly spelled out by the prominent Zionist leader Max Nordau in a
statement to the British authorities:“We know what you want from
us: that we defend the Suez Canal.We must defend your route to India
which passes through the Middle East.We are ready to take on that
difficult task. But you must allow us to become powerful enough to carry
out that task.”And, as a matter of fact, the Zionists became a
power and succeeded in establishing their own state in 1948: the Zionist
state of Israel. Now their task is to defend oil routes, protect all
the interests of U.S. imperialism and block the advance of the Arab
revolution.Backed by tremendous amounts of imperialist economic
and military aid, the Zionists are constantly acting against national
liberation movements.At one time it was their mission to
penetrate African and Asian independence movements, guarantee that the
newly independent states followed paths acceptable to imperialism, that
they not stray from the confines of neo-colonialism. Israel offered
courses, advisers, all sorts of aid.But the ploy wasn’t very
successful. Israel’s increasing role as imperialism’s policeman in the
Middle East, its racism and avowed expansionism made the young African
and Asian nations see the dangers of Israeli “aid,”the treachery of
Israeli foreign policy.Nevertheless, the Zionist state took up a
new role in the struggle of world reaction against progress. It went
beyond the geographical confines of the Middle East, established
friendly ties with all reactionary regimes and began to supply arms,
equipment and advisers to those who were trying to suppress national
liberation struggles.The Israeli armaments industry specialized
in designing and producing all sorts of weapons for urban and rural
anti-guerrilla warfare.The South African racist regime, the
dictatorships of Guatemala and El Salvador, and the fascist Pinochet are
among the best clients of the Israeli armaments industry.Israeli arms sales in 1978 were estimated at $400 million.One of their best clients was the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza.Zionist counter-revolution was present in Somoza’s Nicaragua in the
form of Galil guns and Pull-push planes, but they couldn’t stop the
victory of the Sandinista revolutionaries.This is a symbol of
our times: neither the machinations of Zionist counterrevolution, nor
Israeli arms, can hold back the victorious march of the peoples of the
world." (Nov 4, 1979 edition of Granma, official newspaper voice of Castro's government.)

Why Not a Probe of ‘Israel-gate’?
As Official Washington fumes about Russia-gate, Israel’s far more
significant political-influence-and-propaganda campaigns are ignored. No
one dares suggest a probe of Israel-gate, says Robert Parry.

High Court considers home demolition for Jewish extremists
Discussions held in light of a petition filed by family of Mohammed Abu
Khdeir calling for the demolition of his murderers' homes; state lawyer
argues policy not warranted as a deterrence measure, while family
attorney cites 'double standards.'

The main reason for the new anti-Semitism
Op-ed: It’s neither Israel’s stand towards terror, nor the fact that it
won’t give up all lands claimed by the Palestinians. The real reason
for the growing hatred towards the Jewish state is pure jealousy. (Ils vont me faire crever de rire ces gens-là!!)

The KGB's Middle East Files: The fight against Zionism and world Jewry
Break-ins, forgeries, creating front organizations and even planting
bombs – all means were justified in the battle that the Soviet
intelligence agency waged against the Zionist movement, the emigration
of Jews from the USSR and the world’s major Jewish organizations.
Classified documents now reveal that the agency’s leaders saw Zionism as
a real threat to the Soviet empire, and did everything in their power
against it.