Remember everyone got a shield this round who voted and some people got extra damage for using items like a photon or Q's special pain pill.

Heyneck carried over 2 damage from missing the vote in round 8

*You will note that Rabb didn't vote. That is what the debate between JCM and myself was. It was whether or not he should go home for skipping a vote. But we have set a precedent by not killing off no votes immediately. For several people I think it was good we didn't. If Rabb had gotten any kind of votes he would have gone home. But he hadn't missed a vote before and got absolutely 0 votes this round. That ended up being the deciding factor on ghwk going home instead. Dr. Bronc didn't vote either but he died no matter what.

Hey man - this is wrong for me. Q gave me something I could hang on to next round. I did you use my torpedos this round to take out that darth vader from Baltimore.

I got totally screwed, not by phaser fire but by a ****ing debate. With 3 votes. Who ever was arguing for me you suck at it. If you were arguing against me then you are a steaming turd. And the guy who doesn't vote lives on. This is some sad sad **** right here.

Ok BS let me know how I can help.

I'm gonna go kick some puppies and kittens.

Actually - Heyneck was supposed to have some carry over damage from prior non voting rounds. I think this was another miscalculation. Ghwk stays.

Some technical difficulties are preventing us from posting the rules for the next round. It may go up in the morning. Stay tuned....

That being that you got off the vote wrong. When you get offf, get it right.

Heyneck had carry over. It was posted earlier. He was a non-voter in like 3 rounds. He and ghwk tied in votes last round... does a non-voter really carry the same weight as a legit contributor. I know Apa doesn't like ghwk... and I hate the fact that every time I type his name my computer autorcorrects to gawk. but Apa. Comeone man! Heyneck and Ghwak have the same deals, but heyneck had some longevity in being a non-entity and that **** was carrying over right? Dude didn't vote last two rounds.

I'm sorry falconer is gone. He could have been whily. But he would have known I am right. Stevern We have differences, but you know I am right. These mods have spent too much time in the clsooroom and haven't got it correct here.

That being that you got off the vote wrong. When you get offf, get it right.

Heyneck had carry over. It was posted earlier. He was a non-voter in like 3 rounds. He and ghwk tied in votes last round... does a non-voter really carry the same weight as a legit contributor. I know Apa doesn't like ghwk... and I hate the fact that every time I type his name my computer autorcorrects to gawk. but Apa. Comeone man! Heyneck and Ghwak have the same deals, but heyneck had some longevity in being a non-entity and that **** was carrying over right? Dude didn't vote last two rounds.

Your ****ing b****ing Irish is tired. I am looking into it. I interpreted the rules that from round 8 forward any non voter got a 2 point penalty. But that it didn't accumulate. I have a text to JCM for his clarification. I did fin the miscalculation though and it applied to his votes. His new adjusted tally this round USING my criteria is 7 votes. If his damage accumulated the vote would go to 9 and it would be a tie. I think the tie breaker should be participation. But I will wait for JCM to weigh in.

By the way I also am the one who argued my ass off for ghwk to stay.

I don't make the rules of the game up. I just track the votes. I have complained about how many voting options there are now for several rounds. It makes tallying tedious, and quite frankly the amount of ****ing b****ing you guys do makes it not ****ing worth it.

So shut the **** up, sit tight, and we will see how this plays out in the morning.

Your ****ing b****ing Irish is tired. I am looking into it. I interpreted the rules that from round 8 forward any non voter got a 2 point penalty. But that it didn't accumulate. I have a text to JCM for his clarification. I did fin the miscalculation though and it applied to his votes. His new adjusted tally this round USING my criteria is 7 votes. If his damage accumulated the vote would go to 9 and it would be a tie. I think the tie breaker should be participation. But I will wait for JCM to weigh in.

By the way I also am the one who argued my ass off for ghwk to stay.

I don't make the rules of the game up. I just track the votes. I have complained about how many voting options there are now for several rounds. It makes tallying tedious, and quite frankly the amount of ****ing b****ing you guys do makes it not ****ing worth it.

So shut the **** up, sit tight, and we will see how this plays out in the morning.

Ah my good sir, then please accept my apologies for insinuating you don't argue a case well. JCM on the other hand is still a steaming turd.

One step closer to dancing on bmore's grave. Ah the sweet irony if another vote goes all to hell for him.

If I am beamed aboard with DB4L and Steven, I would like to change my torpedo vote to Bmore Manning. If that can be played.

Thank you sirs!

Frankly your vote should be entirely invalidated because you did not follow the round directions and told me to use 2 phasers at Heyneck when the round stated 3, so I applied 3. You were beamed up to DB4L's ship so I applied your photon torpedo at Bmoremanning.

I think the confusion lies within the photon torpedo from Q or the photon torpedo carried over.

And quite frankly ghwk. Your vote should be invalidated. When I get ****ty ass votes that do not follow directions and make my ****ing job (voluntary job that is) harder. I pray you guys are taken out. This **** does not help:

Quote:

Whatever s**t I have left throw at bmoremanning

I had to dig through 3 rounds of votes to apply "whatever you had left"

So I just checked again and in doing so, I just caught a second error as I applied ghwk with a torpedo penalty, but I should not have. So take away 3 points and he only has 6 damage.

So actually Heyneck may very well go home. But I don't want to make the final answer because I don't make the ****ing rules, I just get b****ed at for them because I have to track them.

And quite frankly ghwk. Your vote should be invalidated. When I get ****ty ass votes that do not follow directions and make my ****ing job (voluntary job that is) harder. I pray you guys are taken out. This **** does not help:

I had to dig through 3 rounds of votes to apply "whatever you had left"

So I just checked again and in doing so, I just caught a second error as I applied ghwk with a torpedo penalty, but I should not have. So take away 3 points and he only has 6 damage.

That results in a 3 way tie for 4th most votes. I go back to my argument that a non-active player should go home instead. But hey I don't make the ****ing rules, I just get b****ed at for them because I have to track them.

So whatever JCM ****ing wants to do he can do. I don't care.

Ah sorry APA your job sucks btw and I don't ever want it. Yes that is exactly what I sent and if you want to invalidate it then please do. I thought it was easy because I had 3 phasers and 6 torpedoes which I thought you were tracking on your abacus or whatever the heck you are using. I guess I never would have thought you'd trust us to give you an accurate throw weight.

If I play on I'll give you better info. JCM if my future is up to you please disregard the turd label. Unless you still vote no. In that case I will go hunt for a jpg.

It is not that I don't track it. It is that I get b****ed at to get the vote out and if I take more than 20 minutes it gets worse. I have everything saved from every vote and PM but the reason JCM asks for the vote to be specific is so I can easily apply what you have and then cross check it.

When you say "whatever I have left" I have to go back and tally up leftovers and THEN cross check everything. Instead of just tallying up what you say against what I have tracked.

The spread sheets get so big because of the options, so much so that I have to make a new tab for each round of voting. It just becomes too cumbersome if I did it all on one sheet. It actually is so much easier when the PM is formatted to the specific category. Because I can just go down the spreadsheet and fill in that area. I have check cells set up but it goofed with ghwks torpedo count.

I am feeling pretty ****ty right now about screwing up the vote. Given the damn twists and turns and voting options and gifts, I was pretty pleased with my tracking, until tonight.

The fact that an error in my tracking led me to say a person was off the game when they shouldn't have feels pretty bad. But it gets damn frustrating how ungrateful you guys can be. Especially when I see four posts in a row from Irish.

It is not that I don't track it. It is that I get b****ed at to get the vote out and if I take more than 20 minutes it gets worse. I have everything saved the reason JCM asks for the vote to be specific is so I can easily apply what you have and check it.

When you say "whatever I have left" I have to go cross check everything. Instead of just tallying up what you say against what I have tracked.

The spread sheets get so big because of the options, so much so that I have to make a new tab for each round of voting. It just becomes too cumbersome if I did it all on one sheet. It actually is so much easier when the PM is formatted to the specific category. Because I can just go down the spreadsheet and fill in that area. I have check cells set up but it goofed with ghwks torpedo count.

I am feeling pretty ****ty right now about screwing up the vote. Given the damn twists and turns and voting options and gifts, I was pretty pleased with my tracking, until tonight.

The fact that an error in my tracking led me to say a person was off the game when they shouldn't have feels pretty bad. But it gets damn frustrating how ungrateful you guys can be. Especially when I see four posts in a row from Irish.

Ok game mode off here, I think it been a great game and I want to throw some props to you and JCM for hosting while the rest of us sit around and shoot off our mouths. Reminds me of when I coached little league, now soccer which I don't know **** about, and all the other parents contributions amount to a pile of comments and that's it.

So all the **** I throw at you and JCM from my point has just been to make the game more fun and give folks something to read. Nothing personal and I'll keep those to a minimum and just direct to the other spacers.

As far as making a mistake it couldn't have come at a better time in terms of Bmores gloat fest, so no worries on my part at all. I love karma when it spins my way.