The Choe Hui-seop (39) MBC sports plus baseball commentator explained on the child rearing expenses non-provision dispute. “the content that it goes wrong in relation with the divorce of the recent I and allowance for cost of bringing up a child is known and his exact fact is trying to be explained in fact” the luck were taken off and Choe Hui-seop expressed Choe Hui-seop position through the report material on 18th. Choe Hui-seop and former Miss Korea Yoomi Kim got the end of last year divorce by mutual agreement after getting married last December 2010. 2 people are putting one children on the subgenual. He had been paying ” the expense of bringing up a child. But it didn’t become the whole wife and contact recently and the child and reception became difficult. It was the situation where each other emotional deposit remains. It was not contacted to the situation where it is unable to meet the child and about several times didn’t transmit the child rearing expenses and it explained. After that, it emphasized because Choe Hui-seop finished the consultation on the issue of child support. This problem was satisfactorily discussed through the organ adjusting ” recent child rearing expenses conflict and He is the situation where it delivers altogether the presently unpaid child rearing expenses. The child and reception problem was satisfactorily agreed, it revealed. After Choe Hui-seop was divorced from Yoomi Kim, this day specialty in entertainment media dispatch reported as sons and daughters foster expenses non-provision to be registered as the 76th in ‘the Baedeuppadeoseu (Bad Fathers)’ list. ‘Baedeuppadeoseu’ is the site introducing the one’s history of the dad that doesn’t give the child rearing expenses. As to Choe Hui-seop, the joining an organization retired from the U.S. Major league in KIA in 2007 in 2015 after being rough. It is playing an active part as MBC sports plus commentator from June, 2016. The following is Choe Hui-seop official position speciality. Hello. It is Choe Hui-seop. The content that it goes wrong in relation with my divorce and allowance for cost of bringing up a child was trying to be known recently and it is reported and the explanation is trying to offer his exact fact in fact. While being busy, it makes a hassle and is truly sorry for individual my work. Only, it thought to be the situation where it is needed to the whole wife and it breaks with me to catch directly the truth going wrong up to all children. I had been getting the year-end divorce by mutual agreement in 2017 and after the expense of bringing up a child has been being paid. But it didn’t become the whole wife and contact recently and the child and reception had the thing which becomes difficult. It was the situation where the mutual emotional grudge remained. It was not connected in the situation where it is unable to meet the child and about several times didn’t transmit the child rearing expenses. This problem was satisfactorily discussed through the organ adjusting the child rearing expenses conflict recently and it is the situation where it delivers altogether the presently unpaid child rearing expenses. The child and reception problem was satisfactorily agreed. But the text in which this part was known in the wrong way and which censured me and which it criticizes in one related Internet Cafe was noticed. In order to accomplish like the child rearing expenses and on reception ago through the person who the whole wife is helpful in the organization of mediation so far in the future, the conversation was amiably finished. It asks to refer to this kind of detail. Thank yousource : [http://news.tf.co.kr/read/entertain/1733378.htm, 2018/09/19 00:00:01]