15 Mar 2013

Dilip Datta’s latest deal is the
most novel so far and suggests how skilfully the Ashram finances and properties
are being diverted and subverted by the Trustees. On the face of it there are two
apparently unconnected events: 1) Ratnadeep Datta and his wife bought another plush
house in Pondicherry, and 2) an Ashramite was assigned a new house in the
Ashram. Nothing strange apparently until you realise that the Ashramite was the
same person who sold the house to Ratnadeep Datta and his wife Jyotsna and that
the sale of the house was at a price far below its market value. Now the
skeletons come tumbling out!

Let us review the sequence of events
as they occurred:

On 13.13.1974
one Michèle Mercier, a French citizen living in the Ashram, purchased a plot of
land of 1800 sq.ft. and later built a large three storeyed building named
“Abhiseka” situated at 9, Padmini Thottam, Kuruchikuppam, Puducherry 605012.

She lived there
all of these years even after she was formally admitted into the Ashram as a
permanent Inmate. It is a large house, more than sufficient for an entire
family to live in, and certainly more than enough for one person. But having no
income, and with maintenance costs increasing, she found the house too big to manage.

In 2009, she
approached the Ashram Trustees with the offer to donate the building to the
Ashram in exchange for a smaller house closer to the Ashram main building.
Instead Dilip Datta allegedly made a counter offer: she could sell the land to
his son for a low price, and keep the money while still getting herself premium
accommodation assigned from the Ashram! She readily agreed.

Dr Dilip Datta,
head of the Ashram’s medical section, told her that Huta D Hindocha (the
Mother’s confidante) was quite ill and would not survive much longer, and
promised to assign Michèle her house as soon as she passed away.

Miraculously
and to the great consternation of “Dr Death”, Huta continued to live against
all medical odds. Several times she was hospitalised in a private hospital in
critical condition, but each time she bounced back miraculously and returned to
complete the work assigned to her by the Mother. Throughout, Huta refused to go
to the Ashram Nursing Home because of her dangerous experience with Dr Dilip Datta.
(A few years earlier, “Dr Death” had wrongly diagnosed her as having pneumonia
and gave her heavy doses of wrong medication for three months that broke her
health for good. She never recovered from that wrong treatment and refused to
have anything to do with Dr Dilip Datta after that.)

Finally, in early
October 2011, under pressure of other doctors of the Ashram, Huta agreed to
shift to the Ashram Nursing Home. Once more in the care of “Dr Death”, she did
not return alive.

Even while Huta
was receiving treatment in the Nursing Home, Dilip Datta gave the go ahead to
his son for purchase of Michèle’s house. But Michèle Mercier had been
disappointed too often. She wanted some guarantee for her interests to be
protected. What if, she asked, Huta did not die now? What if, after completing
the sale, she was not given the house that she wanted? Dilip Datta agreed that
she could sell half the house to begin with and transfer the other half after
shifting to her Ashram assigned premium accommodation.

On 12th
October 2011, while Huta was struggling for life at the Nursing Home, Michèle Mercier
signed the sale deed transferring 50% of the “undivided share” of her property
to Dilip Datta’s son Ratnadeep Datta and his wife in a sale deed that is
unprecedented and quite anomalous. (More of that later.)

On 17th
November 2011, Huta D Hindocha passed away in the Ashram Nursing Home.
According to her Will, her body was brought back to her house and kept on her
bed, surrounded by the Mother’s Treasures and her life’s work done under the
Mother’s guidance. Dilip Datta and Ratnadeep Datta were not among those who
came to see her off.

A few months later,
Michèle came to Huta’s house and demanded that the house be handed over to her.
She said, “I have been waiting for this house for the last 5 years!”

So what is wrong with the sale deed
by which Dilip Datta’s family has purchased Michèle’s house? Plenty! This deed
of sale does things no one in her right mind would accept – it binds Michèle to
complete loss of privacy and loss of control of her entire house even while
selling only half of it. It prevents her from selling the other half of her
house to anyone else except Dilip Datta’s family members. It allows Ratnadeep Datta to own the entire house for good while only
paying for half of it and that too at a price well below market rates! Strange,
wouldn’t you say? [extract -- read full article below]

DattaGate: Exposing the Corrupt
Trustees of the Ashram!

The question has often been asked:
why are the present Trustees of the Ashram so keen to protect and promote
corruption in the Ashram affairs? The answer is simple: because the Trustees
are part of the corruption and derive personal benefits! But, people ask, what
do they need money for? What would they do with the crores that they have
allegedly siphoned off from the Ashram’s finances? In this article we explore one
of the many novel ways in which Dilip Datta, Trustee of the Ashram, has been
siphoning Ashram funds to benefit his immediate family members.

The Ashram Trust holds vast
properties in Pondicherry, and since the Trustees keep all Ashram affairs
hidden from the Ashram resident Inmates, they can get away with surreptitious
sales of the Ashram’s lands and properties. There have been many land scams in
the last 15 years in which the Trustees sold off Ashram lands purchased by Sri
Aurobindo and the Mother (or received by them as gifts) for the Ashram’s needs
and future security. Each time Ashram land is sold off over 50% of the sale
price is alleged to be received by the Trustees in cash and used for their personal
benefits. The Ashram resident Inmates
and devotees do not know that land has been sold until the deed is irreversibly
done, and then also only by word of mouth. They watch helplessly as the
Trustees are breaking up all that the Mother and Sri Aurobindo worked to build,
and as the future security of the community is rapidly eroded.

But because the Trustees are now
under the scanner of the Government having started a legal battle with the Government
of Puducherry with regard to their corrupt practices, they are more careful,
less blatant in their corruption. But the sale of Ashram land and property
continues unabated, but now in increasingly novel forms of corruption. DattaGate
is a case in point. Read on.

From Refugee to Trustee

Dr Dilip Datta was practising
medicine in Assam where he had developed the dubious reputation of “Dr Death”
for the large numbers of deaths from medical negligence under his watch. Eventually
the law caught up with him and he was charged with criminal cases of medical
negligence with arrest and imprisonment allegedly imminent. His reputation
shattered, he sought out new lands where he could live anonymously in comfort
and his children would get a free and secure education. It was thus that he
came to settle in the Sri Aurobindo Ashram in the early 1980s, and his children
received free education in the Ashram school. He kept a low profile and
ingratiated himself to Manoj Das Gupta over the years having identified him as
a growing power centre. Eventually he received the reward for his personal
loyalty by being nominated as Trustee of the Ashram in a closed door session of
the Trust Board. The meteoric rise of his family fortunes began from that point
– from a lower middle class family without finances his family today allegedly
owns under various names, large properties in Pondicherry and Chennai worth in
excess of Rs 20 crores.

Earlier Dilip Datta was limiting use
of his influence as a doctor in the Ashram to only help his children get jobs.
His daughter and elder son had thus found themselves convenient jobs abroad.
But as a Trustee, Dilip Datta began to use the influence of the Ashram Trust
Board to seek special favours for his entire family. As the benefits accrued,
he sought more. Meanwhile his younger son, Ratnadeep Datta, who had joined the
Indian Army and was doing well, was asked abruptly to leave his natural calling.
Dilip Datta allegedly pulled strings through the Ashram’s connections and
managed to get his son discharged from the Army on health and other specious
grounds. Ratnadeep took up employment in a private business in Pondicherry and
along with his wife and her extended family became the front for Dilip Datta’s
shady dealings.

As an example, in 1999 a local Tamil
newspaper of Pondicherry published a “Personal” email of Dilip Datta to a
Mumbai businessman, seeking to invest an amount “50 lacs to 75 lacs” in Indian
Oil Company deposits for 16% interest. Here is an individual who has so much
money to invest that he does not even know how much he wants to invest! At that
time the amounts involved were so large that, like an institutional investor,
he was actually demanding his terms on the interest! Where does a middle class
family man, jobless for 20 years and unable to pay for his children’s
education, get so much money suddenly! (A copy of the email as published in the
newspaper is attached.)

Datta Family Buys Another House

But Dilip Datta’s latest deal is the
most novel so far and suggests how skilfully the Ashram finances and properties
are being diverted and subverted by the Trustees. On the face of it there are two
apparently unconnected events: 1) Ratnadeep Datta and his wife bought another plush
house in Pondicherry, and 2) an Ashramite was assigned a new house in the
Ashram. Nothing strange apparently until you realise that the Ashramite was the
same person who sold the house to Ratnadeep Datta and his wife Jyotsna and that
the sale of the house was at a price far below its market value. Now the
skeletons come tumbling out!

Let us review the sequence of events
as they occurred:

On 13.13.1974
one Michèle Mercier, a French citizen living in the Ashram, purchased a plot of
land of 1800 sq.ft. and later built a large three storeyed building named
“Abhiseka” situated at 9, Padmini Thottam, Kuruchikuppam, Puducherry 605012.

She lived there
all of these years even after she was formally admitted into the Ashram as a
permanent Inmate. It is a large house, more than sufficient for an entire
family to live in, and certainly more than enough for one person. But having no
income, and with maintenance costs increasing, she found the house too big to manage.

In 2009, she
approached the Ashram Trustees with the offer to donate the building to the
Ashram in exchange for a smaller house closer to the Ashram main building.
Instead Dilip Datta allegedly made a counter offer: she could sell the land to
his son for a low price, and keep the money while still getting herself premium
accommodation assigned from the Ashram! She readily agreed.

Dr Dilip Datta,
head of the Ashram’s medical section, told her that Huta D Hindocha (the
Mother’s confidante) was quite ill and would not survive much longer, and
promised to assign Michèle her house as soon as she passed away.

Miraculously
and to the great consternation of “Dr Death”, Huta continued to live against
all medical odds. Several times she was hospitalised in a private hospital in
critical condition, but each time she bounced back miraculously and returned to
complete the work assigned to her by the Mother. Throughout, Huta refused to go
to the Ashram Nursing Home because of her dangerous experience with Dr Dilip Datta.
(A few years earlier, “Dr Death” had wrongly diagnosed her as having pneumonia
and gave her heavy doses of wrong medication for three months that broke her
health for good. She never recovered from that wrong treatment and refused to
have anything to do with Dr Dilip Datta after that.)

Finally, in early
October 2011, under pressure of other doctors of the Ashram, Huta agreed to
shift to the Ashram Nursing Home. Once more in the care of “Dr Death”, she did
not return alive.

Even while Huta
was receiving treatment in the Nursing Home, Dilip Datta gave the go ahead to
his son for purchase of Michèle’s house. But Michèle Mercier had been
disappointed too often. She wanted some guarantee for her interests to be
protected. What if, she asked, Huta did not die now? What if, after completing
the sale, she was not given the house that she wanted? Dilip Datta agreed that
she could sell half the house to begin with and transfer the other half after
shifting to her Ashram assigned premium accommodation.

On 12th
October 2011, while Huta was struggling for life at the Nursing Home, Michèle Mercier
signed the sale deed transferring 50% of the “undivided share” of her property
to Dilip Datta’s son Ratnadeep Datta and his wife in a sale deed that is
unprecedented and quite anomalous. (More of that later.)

On 17th
November 2011, Huta D Hindocha passed away in the Ashram Nursing Home.
According to her Will, her body was brought back to her house and kept on her
bed, surrounded by the Mother’s Treasures and her life’s work done under the
Mother’s guidance. Dilip Datta and Ratnadeep Datta were not among those who
came to see her off.

A few months later,
Michèle came to Huta’s house and demanded that the house be handed over to her.
She said, “I have been waiting for this house for the last 5 years!”

So what is wrong with the sale deed
by which Dilip Datta’s family has purchased Michèle’s house? Plenty! This deed
of sale does things no one in her right mind would accept – it binds Michèle to
complete loss of privacy and loss of control of her entire house even while
selling only half of it. It prevents her from selling the other half of her
house to anyone else except Dilip Datta’s family members. It allows Ratnadeep Datta to own the entire house for good while only
paying for half of it and that too at a price well below market rates! Strange,
wouldn’t you say?

The Ashram’s Loss is Datta Family’s Gain

Let us look at the specifics of the
Sale Deed:

The market value for the house is about
1.5 crore Rupees. But Ratnadeep Datta has purchased half the property for only Rs
35 lakhs, a throwaway price by market standards!

Ratnadeep Datta promises to buy the other
half of the house after 3 years, in return for which Michèle Mercier
immediately gives him entire possession of her house.

But the property will be worth much more
by the time 3 years are over, so how much will Ratnadeep have to pay by October
2014? The Sale Deed is completely silent on this! This is unheard of in any
transaction. Have you ever heard of a sale in which half the property is sold
with a promise to buy the other half in 3 years without specifying the
remaining payment? For the buyer it amounts to exposing himself to blackmail as
the seller can then demand any price on a whim!

So why did Ratnadeep agree to such a
dangerous purchase? Because the sale is for an “undivided half” of the house.
That means there is no boundary line which separates Michèle’s personal space
from Dilip Datta’s family space. In other words Dilip Datta’s family can walk
into any part of Michèle’s house and demand that she share the space with them.
Because of this one detail, it is the seller, Michèle Mercier who is exposing herself
to risk of blackmail by Dilip Datta’s family!

Worse still. Since
Ratnadeep owns an undivided half of the house, no one else can buy the other
half from Michèle without getting into
serious conflict with Datta’s family. In
other words only a member of Dilip Datta’s family can or will buy the other
undivided half of the house! In fact if Ratnadeep refuses to buy the other
half within three years, Michèle has no option except to wait until Datta’s family decides to buy, at whatever price they choose to
buy at. And if they offer far less than Rs 35 lakhs, or even nothing at all for
the other half, she will be forced to accept.

In fact a local
lawyer suggests that this is a device by which Ratnadeep Datta will end up
buying the entire house without paying anything more and evade the high stamp
duty that the full payment would entail, and also evade the high income tax and
property tax that it would involve. By all normal standards, this would be
treated as an illegal transaction and could land both sides in jail.

So why would Michèle Mercier submit herself to such a dangerous arrangement?
Precisely because she has been promised a complete new house for free by Dilip Datta
in his capacity as Trustee of the Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust. The transfer of
her house to Datta’s family is left incomplete until she is given her new house
by the Ashram Trust at which point she will sign off the other half of her old house
to Datta’s family! Even if she does not get the amount due to her from Datta’s family (at whatever
price – revised or unrevised) she would still be the sole occupant of a plush
independent house exclusively designed and decorated for her by the Ashram’s
construction department, and she would be living in a property which is worth
far more than the house she has sold off.

In either case, at whatever price, and
whether the final transaction is completed or not, Michèle still keeps her free
cash of Rs 35 lakhs while getting a large house of higher value fully furnished
and decorated to her tastes and instructions! In other words, Michèle Mercier remains
the winner all along in this risky-looking arrangement.

So who loses? If Dilip Datta’s family
gains property worth 1.5 crores for a mere 35 lakhs, and if Michèle gets a new
redecorated house worth much more along with excess cash for free, then someone
has to lose along the way right? Who is the loser here? You guessed right: it
is the Sri Aurobindo Ashram which loses everything! It is the Ashram which ends up paying Michèle Rs 35 lakhs while
giving her free premium accommodation. Or, looking at the situation another
way, it is the Ashram which ends up gifting away a Rs 1.5 crores 3-storey house
to Dilip Datta’s family. Whichever way
you look at it, Dilip Datta as Trustee of the Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust has
stolen a large premium house from the Ashram and given it away to his son for
free! It is the Ashram which is the loser all the way and in every way, and it
is Dilip Datta as Trustee who is directly responsible for causing enormous loss
to the Ashram as an institution.

Even worse. As if this loss to the Ashram
is not enough, after giving away the Ashram’s cash and house to Michèle for
free, Dilip Datta orders the Ashram’s construction service to renovate and redecorate
the entire house at further expense to make it comfortable to suit Michèle’s
personal fancies! But this is the very same house on which the Ashram spent large
sums just a few years ago to prepare it for Huta to stay and work for preservation
and publication of the Mother’s Treasures. (More on that later.)

It is alleged by land brokers of Pondicherry
that Dilip Datta’s family members have bought properties worth twenty crores in
Pondicherry and Chennai. From where have they got so much money? The eldest son,
Sanjeev Datta, did not even have a decent job for the last five years. Vinay Sharan
(Dilip Datta’s son-in-law) was unemployed until recently when Dilip Datta used the
Ashram Trust’s “recommendation” to get him a job in France in the company owned
by the husband of Devasmita (sister of Peter Heehs’ girlfriend). Ratnadeep Datta
is the only one who has a regular job in an IT firm, but his current income is
very far from enabling his family to buy so much real estate in Puducherry. So,
from where has all the big money come from? The local grapevine says that these
unlimited funds come from the offerings of the millions of devotees of Sri
Aurobindo and the Mother from all over India and the world sent to the Ashram
Trust. A substantial part of these
offerings is converted by the Trustees into unaccounted cash and is invested
through their proxies. Check the assets of these people, inquire into the
source of their funds and many more skeletons will come tumbling out of the
cupboards of the DisGrace Office of the Ashram Trustees.

This cosy arrangement between the
Trustees and their relatives is designed to cheat the Ashram and steal Mother’s
property to hand it over to private family and business interests, to the detriment of the Mother’s work and the reason for
which She created the Ashram. And this is just one of several equally painful
cases of serious theft by the present Trustees in the last decade.

The Mother’s Ashram

Could things have been done differently? How would responsible and
honest Trustees have behaved in the matter? In the same way as we should all be
behaving with the Mother and for the Mother:

Michèle already had a large house to herself, so the Ashram does not need
to provide housing for her. If at all she wanted a smaller house, closer to the
Ashram, she could have transferred her house to the Ashram for the Mother’s use
and for other Ashram Inmates to live in while she was shifted elsewhere. The
Ashram would have benefitted all the way.

In fact, in the early
days of the Ashram it was the norm that whoever joined the Ashram as disciple
of Sri Aurobindo would give everything that they owned to the Guru, Sri
Aurobindo and the Mother. Nothing was left that was one’s own.

Today, when the
present Trustees have replaced the Mother’s rule by the Trustees’ personal
ego-rule, this norm has been perverted so that people sell off their property
for personal benefit and then further demand that the Ashram give them extra
benefits! Or, they give side benefits (a.k.a. “kickbacks”) to the Trustees in
order to gain from the Ashram’s resources. This is only possible because the
present Trustees do not care for the Mother and Sri Aurobindo, and use them merely
as figureheads to get donations which they can loot and divert to their family
and business interests. This is the root cause of why the Trustees continue to support
and promote to Peter Heehs in his abuse of Sri Aurobindo.

The right thing for all those who love the Mother and Sri
Aurobindo is to refocus their loyalty upon the Mother and refuse to serve the
perverse whims and fancies of these corrupt Trustees, and instead demand that
these Trustees step down before they bring the Ashram to ruin. It is our responsibility
to protect the Ashram’s interests in Service of the Mother, and not to serve
the Trustees’ perverse interests.

Mother’s Treasures in Danger

And what of the house that was
prepared for Huta and for the Mother’s work? What is happenning to the Mother’s
Treasures which Huta was curating, organising and publishing? It is alleged
that the Trustees have ordered all her things to be taken away. Manoj Das
Gupta, the Managing Trustee, reportedly said “Huta was troubling the Mother” and
hence he has no interest in preserving the paintings and correspondence of Huta
with the Mother! A perverted mind can never know the value of the Mother’s work
with Huta.

It was the Mother who trained Huta over
18 years for the Savitri and other
painting series which Mother said were Her paintings executed through Huta’s
hands. In each case, the Mother led Huta into the direct spiritual experiences
embodied and expressed in these paintings. All of this is documented in the
Mother’s rich, diverse and detailed correspondence with Huta. And then there
are all the objects that the Mother used which she gave to Huta with specific
instructions. All of these things and more comprise “Mother’s Treasures” that
Huta was publishing and curating as part of the work given to her by the Mother.
Mother’s work still continues in Huta’s house, but now under grave threat of
harm from the Trustees’ business interests.

Dilip Datta’s personal
gain is Mother’s loss. It is for us to choose if we will stand up for the
Mother’s Work, or if we will sit quietly and let the Trustees continue their
crimes and allow them to destroy Mother’s Work.

Attached is a copy of the first few
pages of the sale deed of the Datta family transaction with Michèle Mercier
providing incontrovertible evidence of Dilip Datta’s latest crime. Also attached is a copy of his personal email dated May 25,
1999 as published in a Tamil newspaper.

2 comments:

The details of the land and real estate squabbling will shock any right thinking person-more so if it happens at a spiritual centre and worse still- if the dramatis personae happen to be the powers that hold the reins.A trustee needs to uphold the trust of the sadhaks, in the light of the life and work of the Masters who give them the sustenance- material and spiritual. If the proverbial norm of caesar or his wife are not above the needle of suspicion, then the consequences are likely to be catastrophic. One cannot but remind those who sully the image of the Ashram by such conduct - the Decree of the Master in 'The Hour of God'::"In the hour of God cleanse thy soul of all self-deceit and hypocracy and vain self-flattering that thou may look straight into thy spirit and hear that which summons it. All insincerity of nature, once thy defence against the eye of the Master and the light of the ideal, becomes now a gap in thy armour and invites the blow.Even if thou conquer for the moment, it is worse for thee, for the blow shall come afterwards and cast thee down in the midst of thy triumph."Do the people who are given to misusing the position of trust given to them by the silent majority, ever wake up, before "the hour of the unexpected"? The majority of spiritual seekers would pray for better and saner sense to prevail, before it is too late.

I would not be surprised if there is a similar fishy deal with Peter Heehs with the Ashram Trust because of which he gets such unstinting support from Manoj Das Gupta. There was already at one point of time a leaked email of Heehs about "Money Matters" going about on the Net. All this talk of neutrality and freedom of speech would be then merely a cover-up for a secret transfer of cash! There should be a thorough investigation of all foreign contributions to the Trust.

About this website

All posts are copyright (c) their respective authors and may not be used outside this website without prior permission.Abusive or disrespectful posts will be deleted immediately. In case of complaints please write to rtlosa@gmail.com. This site is in Beta phase. Please send in your feedback to help us to improve it.