But he's basically saying that all of the NFL owners have colluded against him and are refusing him employment due to his political leadership and stance on violence towards people of color.

That seems to be what he is saying, yeah.

It's possible that he is right, I guess.

Or it could just be that the NFL owners are kind of risk averse. While they could agree with his sentiments, they can also see him as being kind of disruptive and risky to manage the public messages effectively.

Which perhaps would come under a type of political discrimination complaint rather than a collusion complaint. Dunno.

Or it could just be that the NFL owners are kind of risk averse. While they could agree with his sentiments, they can also see him as being kind of disruptive and risky to manage the public messages effectively.

Which perhaps would come under a type of political discrimination complaint rather than a collusion complaint. Dunno.

Team owners have a right to look at his divisionistic rhetoric, and his worn history.. Like they would any employee.