On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 12:11:39PM -0400, Jay Carlson wrote:
> > Actually I'm trying to kill this entire naming problem by getting all
> > patches back to the respective maintainers. Result: no pending patches
> > for cvs binutils, only tiny ones for glibc-current and egcs-current.
>
> What's going to happen to glibc 2.0.6? I suspect the embedded people are
> going to be stuck using it until we figure out how to trim down the binary
> size of 2.2.
Which why I guess we still have to maintain it for a while or even come
up with some alternative small libc.
Ralf