This blog was created for Niles Animal Hospital & Bird Medical Center by Peter S. Sakas DVM in an effort to provide information & discussion about animal related issues. It may move into some eccentric directions on occasion if the mood strikes me as I get more comfortable in this form of communication. I am open to suggestions & comments about the blog. Also view our hospital website www.nilesanimalhospital.com or Facebook page Niles Animal Hospital and Bird Medical Center.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

I had written a blog some time ago, 9/18/11 (http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=6018430237930848742#editor/target=post;postID=7795776760108965644), where I posted an article I had written about the question whether animals have souls. Father Murphy and I held a conversation about it and although we "disagreed" he gave me a very thoughtful and respectful answer. The blog/story had generated interest, being picked up by the Chicago Catholic News and other sites. It is a very interesting question and through the years I have heard a multitude of opinions and explanations.

I now have an "update of sorts" and it addresses the question whether animals go to Heaven.

A few weeks ago my wife and I were having dinner in the church rectory with three of the priests from the parish. Being in the company of these men of the cloth, I related the story about my discussion with Father Murphy about animals having souls and his responses to me.

Father Mair, the retired pastor of the parish, then responded to me. Father Mair has a kind, loving nature about him and an easy going demeanor. He is beloved by the parish. He told me that Father Murphy never really liked dogs and everyone laughed at that revelation. He then went on to tell us the way he handles the question when asked if animals do animals go to Heaven. He said that if you have loved your pets then they will be part of your Paradise and will be in Heaven with you. How can it be Paradise if you are not with the ones you have loved in life?

Father Mair's word really do ring true. For those of us who love our animal companions, it would not be Paradise without them. I still contend that they do have souls, however, but if they do not, it will not be Heaven without them so they will still be there.

There are all sorts of stories and poems about how pets in WILL be in Heaven and I will share a few, one about a dog angel, a tribute to a deceased cat, and finally a classic story based on a Twilight Zone episode (with a link to the actual episode on youtube).

A Little Dog AngelHigh up in the courts of heaven today
a little dog angel waits;
with the other angels he will not play,
but he sits alone at the gates.
"For I know my master will come" says he,
"and when he comes he will call for me."

The other angels pass him by
As they hurry toward the throne,
And he watches them with a wistful eye
as he sits at the gates alone.
"But I know if I just wait patiently
that someday my master will call for me."

And his master, down on earth below,
as he sits in his easy chair,
forgets sometimes, and whispers low
to the dog who is not there.
And the little dog angel cocks his ears
and dreams that his master's voice he hears.

And when at last his master waits
outside in the dark and cold,
for the hand of death to open the door,
that leads to those courts of gold,
he will hear a sound through the gathering dark,
a little dog angel's bark. Noah M. Holland

(A great quote, that is so true is, "A dog is the only one of God's creatures who loves you more than they love themselves.")

Not to leave out cats.....

SHADOW'S SONG (on the death of a cat)
I'm not gone...not
really.
I haven't gone away...I've only gotten bigger.
My eyes, so bright, now shine among the stars.
My voice sings with the wind in winter, as I leap
And dance among the tree tops.
I stalk the blown leaves in autumn, and brush the
Flowers gently in the spring.
I come to you in dreaming, on feet grown dreamtime soft,
And lay my cheek against yours, and whisper:
"Peace be with you."
Someday we will play again together, you and I, among the stars.
'Til then, fear not to love, for your love gave my life meaning.
And I return that love to you...a hundredfold...a thousandfold...
Forever.

"No Dogs In Heaven"

An old man and his dog were walking down a hot, dusty road
lined with a beautiful white fence on both sides. As they walked along, the old
man and his dog became very thirsty and tired.

Soon, they came to a gate in the fence where, on the other
side, they saw a nice grassy, wooded area surrounding a cool clear pool of
fresh water. "Just where a thirsty 'huntin' dog and a man would like to
rest!" thought the old man. But there was a sign over the gate that read
"No Dogs" so they walked on.

Further on, they came upon a man in flowing white robes
standing just inside a strong iron gate across a path that led to a beautiful,
sunny meadow with a cool clear stream running through it.

"'Scuse me Sir," said the old man, "My dog and I
have been on this road all day. Mind if we come in and sit in the shade for
awhile?" "Of course!" The man said. "Come on in and rest.
You look thirsty and tired." The old man said, "We sure are!"
and started through the gate with his dog.

The gatekeeper stopped him. "Sorry, you can come in but
your dog can't come with you. "You see, this is Heaven, and dogs aren't
allowed here. He has to stay out here on the road." "What kind of
Heaven won't allow dogs?" said the old man. "Well, if he can't come
in, then I'll stay out here on the road with him. He's been my faithful
companion all his life and I won't desert him now."

"Suit yourself," said the gatekeeper, "but I
have to warn you, the Devil's on this road and he'll try to sweet talk you into
his place. He'll promise you anything, but dogs can't go there either. If you
won't leave that dog on the road, you'll spend all Eternity on the road with
him. Better if you stay here."

"Well, I'm stayin' with my dog," replied the man and
he and the dog walked on. Gradually, the fence became more and more faded and
rundown until they finally reached a spot where the boards fell away completely
leaving a gap. Another man dressed in old, ragged clothes sat just inside the
broken fence under a shady tree.

"'Scuse me Sir," said the old man, "My dog and I
have been on this road all day. Mind if we come in and sit in the shade for
awhile?" "Of course!" The man said. "Come on in and rest.
There's some cold water here under the tree. Make yourself comfortable."

The old man paused, "but what about my dog? Can he can
come in, too? The man up the road said dogs weren't allowed here, and they had
to stay on the road." The other man answered, "Well, you look pretty
tired and thirsty. Would you come in here and rest if you had to leave that
dog?"

"No sir!" the old man replied, "A glass of cold
water and some shade would be mighty fine right about now but I won't come in
if my buddy here can't come too. I didn't go to Heaven because my dog couldn't
come with me, so I sure as how ain't about to go to Hell without him neither."

The man smiled and said, "Welcome to Heaven, and bring
your dog!" The old man exclaimed, "You mean this is Heaven? And my
dog can come with me? Then why did that fellow down the road say they weren't
allowed in Heaven?" The man replied, "That was the Devil and he gets
all the souls who are willing to give up a life-long companion for small
comfort because they think it will make their lives a little easier."

The man continued, "They soon find out their mistake, but,
then it's too late. The dogs come here, the fickle people stay there. God
wouldn't allow dogs to be banned from Heaven. After all, He created them to be
man's companions in life, why would he separate them in death?"

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Think of the media circus and all the things that were said of Whitney Houston when she died
and Michael Jackson when he died.

This hero died with barely anyone's
notice.

These members of the "Greatest Generation" are dying with hardly a notice. Their sacrifices helped keep us safe and made this the great nation that it is...in a way it is ironic that in their declining years they have seen what has happened to our country that they worked so hard to protect and preserve.

May God Bless them and their families.....we owe them a debt of gratitude.

"Shifty" By Chuck Yeager

Shifty volunteered for the airborne in WWII and served with Easy

Company of the 506th Parachute Infantry
Regiment, part
of the 101st

Airborne Infantry. If you've seen Band of Brothers on HBO or the

History Channel, you know Shifty. His character appears in all 10

episodes, and Shifty himself is interviewed in several of them.

I met Shifty in the Philadelphia airport several
years ago. I didn't

know who he was at the time. I just saw an elderly gentleman having

trouble reading his ticket. I offered to help, assured him that he was

at the right gate, and noticed the "Screaming Eagle," the symbol of

the 101st Airborne, on his hat.

Making conversation, I asked him if he'd been in the 101st Airborne

or if his son was serving. He said quietly that he had been in the

101st. I thanked him for his service, then asked him when he
served,

and how many jumps he made. Quietly and humbly, he said "Well, I
guess I signed up in 1941 or so, and was in until
sometime in 1945 ..."

at which point my
heart skipped.

At that point, again, very humbly, he said "I made the 5 training

jumps at Toccoa, and then jumped into Normandy . . . do you know

where Normandy is?" At this point my heart
stopped.

I told him "yes, I know exactly where Normandy is, and I know
what

D-Day was." At that point he said "I also made a second jump
into

Holland , into Arnhem .." I was
standing with a genuine war hero ...

and then I realized that it was June, just after the anniversary of

D-Day.

I asked Shifty if he was on his way back from France , and he said

"Yes... And it's real sad because, these days, so few of the guys
are

left, and those that are, lots of them can't make the trip." My
heart

was in my throat and I didn't know what to say.

I helped Shifty get onto the plane and then realized he was back in

coach while I was in First Class. I sent the flight attendant back to

get him and said that I wanted to switch seats. When Shifty came

forward, I got up out of the seat and told him I wanted him to have

it, that I'd take his in coach.

He said "No, son, you enjoy that seat. Just knowing that there are

still some who remember what we did and who still care is enough to

make an old man very happy." His eyes were filling up as he said it.

And mine are brimming up now as I write this.

Shifty died on Jan. l7 after fighting cancer.

There was no parade.

No big event in StaplesCenter .

No wall-to-wall, back-to-back 24x7 news coverage.

No weeping fans on television.

And that's not right!

Let's give Shifty his own memorial service, online, in our own quiet way.

Please forward this email to everyone you know. Especially to the
veterans.

Rest in peace,
Shifty.

Chuck Yeager, Maj. General [ret.]

P.S. I think that it is amazing how the "media" chooses our
"heroes" these days...

CFA: Vet bills for your pets increasing

Tax on medical equipment passed along to consumers

PROVIDENCE,
R.I. (WPRI) - The Affordable Care Act is intended for humans, however,
we've learned that a tax on certain medical devices for veterinary
equipment may be passed on to your pets.

Because medical
equipment and supplies will be going up in cost, the extra expense will
be passed on to the customers. But why the price increase? It's part of a
new 2.3% federal excise tax on certain medical devices that just went
into effect. The tax will help fund the Patient Protection Program and
the Affordable Care Act, intended for people, not pets. Manufacturers
pay the tax, but a recent survey found more than half plan to pass it
along, something most veterinarians can't afford.

Medical devices
used only on animals are exempt, but items like IV pumps, sterile
scalpels, and anesthesia equipment, which are duel use devices, as in
they can be used on both humans and animals, will be taxed.
Veterinarians fear higher prices could have animals owners holding off
on medical care, or vets postponing the purchase of new devices.

The
American Veterinary Medical Association represents 82,000 vets. At this
point, they don't know how much this new tax will indirectly cost them,
and they're waiting to hear from device makers.

"Congress never
intended for this tax to impact veterinarian medicine and unfortunately
it has, and I think that's very unfortunate that medicine is subsidizing
human health care", said Dr. Mark Lutschaunig of the AVMA.

Congressional
sources, who worked on the Affordable Care Act, told us lawmakers tried
to exclude vets from being impacted by the dual use medical taxes, but
it was too complicated.

Vets say if your pet is sick or acting
strangely, don't delay care, that could just cause medical problems to
get worse. If you're concerned with the cost of vet care, be sure and
talk to your vet about payment plans or other financial options.

Nature's Variety, Kasel recall pet treats and food

Two companies announced separate recalls on Wednesday of pet food and dog treats. Kasel Associated Industries is pulling
a wide variety of dog treats over salmonella contamination. The recall
covers a wide variety of treats, from chicken jerky to pig ears to
hearts of lamb, produced in its plant in Denver between April and
October last year. The items were sold in Target, Costco, Sam’s Club and
through its website.

A Kasel official said the Colorado Department of Agriculture found
salmonella in its chicken jerky, prompting a recall of that product in
September. The Food and Drug Administration investigated, urging the
company to issue the wider recall.

CHILTON, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Kaytee Products is recalling several bird treats and greens items due to
possible contamination of Salmonella from parsley flake
ingredients supplied to Kaytee by Specialty Commodities, Inc., an
outside supplier to Kaytee.

Product and product lots that do not appear on the list
above are not subject to this recall.

No human or pet illnesses have been reported to-date. The recall
notification is being issued based on a recall letter dated February 11,
2013 from Specialty Commodities, Inc. The above-referenced Kaytee
products were originally manufactured as early as June 12, 2012. While
Kaytee has not had any positive Salmonella results on finished
product to suggest possible contamination, we are initiating this recall
in accordance with FDA guidelines. Kaytee is taking immediate action to
remove the potentially affected product from all retail stores and
distribution centers.

Salmonella can affect animals eating the products and there is a
risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products. Pet owners
should thoroughly wash their hands after having contact with these
products and clean any surfaces that were exposed.

Healthy persons exposed to Salmonella should monitor themselves
for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomit, diarrhea or
bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and fever. In rare circumstances,
infection with Salmonella can result in more serious ailments,
including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye
irritation, and urinary track symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these
symptoms after having contact with these products should contact their
physician or healthcare provider.
Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have
diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have
only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infection but
otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or
humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product(s) and has these
symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Consumers who have purchased the above-referenced Kaytee products with
the referenced “Best Before” dates are urged to contact Kaytee Customer
Service representatives.

A letter and instructions will be forwarded to all Kaytee customers.
Kaytee Customer Service representatives and company veterinarians are
responding to inquires through the 1-800-Kaytee1 (800 529-8331) phone
number and will answer any questions regarding pets that have been fed
the product. Pet owners can also visit the Kaytee website for more
information http://www.kaytee.com/.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Nature’s Variety Recalls Instinct Cat and Dog Food For Plastic Pieces

Nature’s Variety is recalling one batch of Instinct® Raw Organic
Chicken Formula for dogs and cats because clear plastic was found in
some of the bags which may pose a choking risk to pets. The source of
the plastic has been identified and the issue has been resolved. There
have been no reports of harm to pets, but a consumer complaint alerted
the company to the problem.

The products are Instinct Raw Organic Chicken Formula Medallions in 3
pound bags with UPC number 7 69949 60137 1; Instinct Raw Organic
Chicken Formula Medallions in 27 pound cases with UPC number 7 69949
70137 8. Also recalled are Instinct Raw Organic Chicken Formula patties
in 6 pound bags with UPC number 7 69949 60127 2; and Instinct Raw
Organic Chicken Formula patties in 36 pound case with UPC number 7 69949
70127 9. All products have a “best if used by” date of 10/04/13. You
can see all of the product labels at the FDA web site.

Discontinue use of this product. Contact a veterinarian if you have
concerns about your pet’s health. You can obtain a refund or exchange by
returning the product in its original packaging or bringing proof of
purchase to the retailer. For questions and more information, call
Nature’s Variety Consumer Relations team at 1-888-519-7387 Monday
through Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm CT.

Dogs understand human perspective, say researchers

Dogs are more capable of
understanding situations from a human's point of view than has
previously been recognised, according to researchers.

They found dogs were four times more likely to steal food
they had been forbidden, when lights were turned off so humans in the
room could not see.

This suggested the dogs were able to alter their behaviour when they knew their owners' perspective had changed.

The study, published in Animal Cognition, conducted tests on 84 dogs.

The experiments had been trying to find whether dogs could
adapt their behaviour in response to the changed circumstances of their
human owners.

It wanted to see if dogs had a "flexible understanding" that could show they understood the viewpoint of a human.

Dog's understanding
It found that when the lights were turned off, dogs in a room
with their human owners were much more likely to disobey and steal
forbidden food.

The study says it is "unlikely that the dogs simply forgot
that the human was in the room" when there was no light. Instead it
seems as though the dogs were able to differentiate between when the
human was unable or able to see them.

Juliane Kaminski carried out the research into how dogs are influenced by human circumstances

The experiments had been designed with enough variations to
avoid false associations - such as dogs beginning to associate sudden
darkness with someone giving them food, researchers said.

Dr Juliane Kaminski, from the University of Portsmouth's
psychology department, said the study was "incredible because it implies
dogs understand the human can't see them, meaning they might understand
the human perspective".

This could also be important in understanding the capacities
of dogs that have to interact closely with humans, such as guide dogs
for the blind and sniffer dogs.

Previous studies have suggested that although humans might
think that they can recognise different expressions on their dogs'
faces, this is often inaccurate and a projection of human emotions.

"Humans constantly attribute certain qualities and emotions
to other living things. We know that our own dog is clever or sensitive,
but that's us thinking, not them," said Dr Kaminski.

"These results suggest humans might be right, where dogs are
concerned, but we still can't be completely sure if the results mean
dogs have a truly flexible understanding of the mind and others' minds.
It has always been assumed only humans had this ability."

Climbing trees, chasing mice, showing off to the ladies . . . four legs were always handy for Caffrey the cat. Then tragedy struck. When Caffrey was three, the handsome grey Persian was run over by a car and lost his left hind leg. Oh
well. Not to worry. He happily carried on with three, thanks to a
£3,500 series of operations that stitched up the damage and made the
best of his front left paw, which was also injured in the crash.

Strong-willed: Caffrey the black Persian cat who
walks and leads a normal life - despite only having two legs, both on
the same side

Still going strong: Caffrey has had a tough life, yet still continues to battle on through life

Fighter: Caffrey has defied all logic by managing to survive on just two legs

For the next ten years or so,
he coped so well it was easy to forget his disability. But four months
ago he developed a malignant growth on the repaired front leg. His
owner Sue Greaves, 58, couldn't bear to have him put down or put him
through the pain of chemotherapy with no guarantee of success.

So she pleaded Paul Harris
reports 'He doesn't seem bothered at all' for option three – amputating
the leg, leaving him with only two, both on the right side. When
her vet sought opinions from four colleagues, all said it shouldn't be
done. They insisted he would be unable to walk and his life would not be
worth living.

Caring: Caffrey with his best friend and neighbour Ashleigh Tyler

Pain: The unlucky moggie was forced to have his leg amputated recently, which left him with no limbs on one side

Well, Caffrey, take a bow. And a run around the garden. And just for good measure, try a ballet-style pirouette. Although
he was expected to spend weeks recovering at home in Woking, Surrey,
within days he had achieved near perfect balance – helped by next door
neighbour Ashleigh Tyler, eight, who joined the campaign to nurse him
back to health. And less than two months after the £4,000 operation, he is skipping along like a cat on a hot tin roof. 'Everyone
who sees him is astonished at what he can do,' Mrs Greaves said. 'He
doesn't seem bothered at all by having only two legs.'

Whereas people and other animals can simply move their eyes to follow
an object or use peripheral vision to scan a room, owls must turn their
heads for the same effect. These birds
have fixed eye sockets, which means their eyeballs can’t rotate,
forcing them to stretch their necks—a seemingly supernatural feat.
“In the case of birds, their systems are designed to handle that
amount of movement,” said Eric Forsman, a wildlife biologist for the U.S. Forest Service, who was not part of the study. “The tissue, the blood vessels are designed to flex—things don’t just snap.”

Turning Heads
Owls are more flexible than humans because a bird’s head is only
connected by one socket pivot. People have two, which limits our ability
to twist, Forsman added. Owls also have multiple vertebrae, the small
bones that make up the neck and spine, helping them achieve a wide range
of motion.

Yet, even with these skeletal advantages, a bird’s body shouldn’t be
able to withstand such extreme levels of movement. In people, a spinning
head would cause all kinds of internal bleeding and breakage.

For the new research, the Johns Hopkins team obtained 12 dead birds
from educational centers and created 3-D images of the animals’ blood
vessels and bones. The scientists also injected the carcasses with dye
and liquified red plastic to preserve their arteries before dissection,
according to a summary of their research on the U.S. National Science
Foundation website.

The team discovered owls have backup arteries, which offer a fresh
supply of nutrients when blood vessels get closed off by rapid turning.
Their arteries also swell to collect any excess blood created in the
process.

Eerie Ability Not Unique
It’s a powerful adaptive trait, Forsman said, but it’s not unique. Plenty of birds have a similar ability to look behind them. Red-tailed hawks, for example, are almost as flexible as their nocturnal cousins.

“There are lots of advantages to being able to look over your
shoulder and see something coming—if you’re trying to avoid predators or
detect prey,” he said. (Watch a video of an owl hunting prey.)

Owls might not be distinctive within the animal kingdom, but they do
have the corner on Hollywood horror flicks. With their bulbous eyes and
haunting calls, these birds can swivel their way from one thriller to
the next.

Bats Host More Than 60 Human-Infecting Viruses

Many animals harbor viruses that can jump to other species, but bats
may be in a class of their own when it comes to carrying zoonotic
(human-infecting) viruses. Bats are reservoirs for more than 60 viruses
that can infect humans, and host more viruses per species than even
rodents do, new research shows.
"There seems to be something different about bats in terms of being able to host zoonotic infections," study researcher David Hayman, a wildlife epidemiologist at Colorado State University (CSU), told LiveScience.

In recent years, bats have received a lot of attention for their
virus-hosting abilities. They've been shown to carry a number of harmful
infections, including rabies and viruses related to SARS (severe acute
respiratory syndrome). Moreover, research suggests bats may be the original hosts of nasty viruses such as Ebola and Nipah, which causes deadly brain fevers in people.

This impressive track record left Hayman and his colleagues wondering:
Are bats somehow special in their ability to host zoonotic viruses?

Bats vs. rodents
To find out, the researchers compared the virus-hosting abilities of
bats with those of rodents —which are also known to transmit various
zoonotic viral pathogens — by compiling and analyzing databases of every
virus identified in the animals. They found that rodents host 179
viruses, 68 of which are zoonotic; bats, on the other hand, harbor 61
zoonotic viruses, with 137 viruses in total. Though rodents carry
slightly more human-infecting viruses,
bats host more zoonotic viruses per species — on average, each bat
species hosts 1.79 zoonotic viruses, compared with rodents' 1.48 viruses
per species. [10 Deadly Diseases That Hopped Across Species]

"It doesn't seem like a lot," said study co-author Angie Luis, a CSU
disease ecologist. "But when you consider that there are twice as many
rodent species as there are bat species, it's highly significant."
The researchers also looked at different factors that could help
explain bats' surprising zoonotic viral richness. One factor stood out:
sympatry, in which multiple species of an order of organisms inhabit the
same geographical area. Bat and rodent species were more likely to host
multiple viruses if their habitat ranges
overlapped with the ranges of other bat and rodent species,
respectively. And though rodents experience more range overlaps than
bats (due to their greater number of species), the effect of sympatry
was almost four times stronger for bats.

Compared with rodents, "adding one more bat species to another bat
species' range will have a greater effect on the number of viruses it
has," Luis told LiveScience. Essentially, bats share their viruses more
than rodents do, a fact that's especially evident when one examines the
number of host species each virus has. Each bat virus, on average,
infects 4.51 bat species, while each rodent virus infects only 2.76
rodent species. This greater sharing of viruses likely results because
bats typically live in very close quarters with millions of other bats,
Luis said. Physical and genetic similarities between different bat
species may also help the viruses spread more easily.

In addition to sympatry, certain life-history traits appear to affect
the number of viruses a bat species has. Bat species that live longer,
have greater body masses, smaller litter sizes and more litters per year tend to host more zoonotic viruses, the scientists found.

Public health concern?
"I think it's a very interesting study, the first of its kind," said
Jamie Childs, azoonotic disease epidemiologist at Yale University, who
was not involved with the research. "It confirms in many ways the
importance of bats as reservoirs for viruses."

But while the study is a good first step, it "vastly underestimated the
number of viruses bats host," Childs told LiveScience. Recent research
looking at bat guano suggests there are a number of viral agents we
don't have much information on, he said. [Tiny & Nasty: Images of Things That Make Us Sick]

Underestimation or not, the study highlights the public health concern
of bat viruses, Childs said. Though humans don't often come into direct
contact with bats, they can catch their viruses through contact with
infected domesticated animals, including horses, cattle and cats. The
majority of human rabies outbreaks have been linked back to bats, and
transmission of the Nipah and Hendra viruses have resulted in large
outbreaks with lots of fatalities, he said. Even outbreaks of the Ebola
and Marburg viruses, which don't often kill a lot of people, catch the
attention of the worldwide community.

But is there anything we can do to prevent future outbreaks of bat viruses?

Childs doesn't think so, given how the infections spread and the number
of different species the viruses can jump to. "It's very hard to
control the emergence of these infections with humans," he said.

Hayman, on the other hand, thinks that studying the interactions
between bats, humans and domestic animals could be helpful. "We should
to be looking at what we are doing to make bats come into contact with
humans and domestic animals, and try to mitigate that," he said.

The study was published online recently in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook & Google+.

Monday, February 4, 2013

There was a news item in the February 2013 issue of the Veterinary Practice News, discussing how the Chinese have turned a deaf ear to the United States pleas to cease production of chicken jerky treats.The Chinese government also rebuked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for issuing warnings to pet owners about feeding the treats to pets.

In a letter, U.S. Representative Jerry McNerney (California) urged the Chinese government to "consider halting production of these jerky treats until the FDA can determine whether or not the products contain tainted material." The Chinese government responded that "from the perspective of the Chinese side, there may be something wrong with the FDA's investigation guidance."

The FDA began warning pet owners about the dangers of Chinese-produced jerky treats in 2007, after receiving a large number of reports of adverse reactions. It seemed as though things subsided as the complaints decreased in late 2009, but by 2011 the reports of adverse reactions increased again, prompting another warning by the FDA. In early 2012, the FDA's warning was expanded to include not only the chicken jerky treats, but also duck and sweet potato products.

The FDA tested samples for Salmonella, metals, furans, pesticides, antibiotics, mycotoxins, rodenticides, nephrotoxins, other chemicals, and poisonous compounds. They also tested the nutritional composition, in order to determine the amount of glycerin in the treats.

The FDA inspected several Chinese facilities that manufacture the jerky pet treats but found no evidence that those treats were linked to the illnesses. The Chinese government refused to allow the FDA to take samples to the U.S. for testing.

My advice to pet owners is not to use any of these treats which are manufactured in China. Granted, you may have been using them and your pet may not have had a reaction. But with so many cases of adverse reactions occurring nationwide, are you willing to take a chance? In human and pet products alike there have been problems with some of the Chinese products, so exercise caution. Know where the products are manufactured. If at any time you notice that your pet is having changes/problems when given a jerky treat, discontinue their use. To play iy safe when purchasing jerky treats or rawhides for your pets, make sure that they were manufactured in the U.S.A.

I am also not a fan of pig ears, pig snouts, chicken feet, bully or pizzle sticks. I had written a blog about the dangers of bully/pizzle sticks a few days ago. These types of products are greasy, too high in calories and can be a source of bacterial contamination!

Please be cautious and watch for signs of abnormalities anytime you use these types of treats if you insist on using them.

A salmonella outbreak linked to pet hedgehogs has sickened 20 people in
eight states, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).

All the patients were infected with a strain of bacteria called Salmonella typhimurium. Fourteen of the ill people reported direct contact with hedgehogs, the CDC said.

The outbreak began in December 2011, and has continued into 2013. So
far, four people have been hospitalized, and one has died. Many of the
affected have been children, the CDC said.

Washington state has reported the most cases, seven, followed by
Michigan, Minnesota and Ohio, which have each reported three cases.
Other states that have reported infections are Alabama, Illinois,
Indiana and Oregon.
Although the most common source of salmonella infections is food poisoning, animals can spread the disease as well. Besides hedgehogs, salmonella outbreaks have also been linked to pet turtles.

To reduce the risk of infection, it's important to wash your hands
after handling hedgehogs, or anything the animals come in contact with,
the CDC said. Adults should supervise children around hedgehogs and make
sure the youngsters wash their hands after touching the animal or
anything the hedgehog has been in contact with.

The report will be published this week in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Pass it on: Twenty people have fallen ill from a salmonella outbreak linked to hedgehogs.