DSS has succeeded in demoralising judges, says Akintola

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Adeniyi Akintola, has lamented that the Department of State Services (DSS) has succeeded in demoralizing judges and the legal profession in the country.

He said the administration of justice has been affected by the move against the judges by the DSS and that it is a challenge affecting the legal profession. He condemned the action and describe it as unconstitutional and illegal.

The SAN further said that resolution by the Senate to amend laws establishing the DSS with some security outfits in the country is an ignorant move because there was no law regarding the DSS to begin with.

He however commended the Senate’s move to invite the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami (SAN) and the Director-General of the DSS, Lawal Musa Daura, to defend their actions in what the house described as a ‘draconian manner’ in which the DSS invaded the residences of the judges and arrested them.

Akintola stated that the DSS had long been overstepping its bounds and the Senate had done nothing about it. He recalled that during the administration of Olusegun Obasanjo, the DSS tore down the house of Mike Adenuga. He said a monster has been created in the DSS and Nigeria has found itself in a state of quagmire.

He explained that according to CAP 74 of the Laws of the Federation 1986, the State Security Service (SSS) was only provided for and the DSS is an illegal body.

“We are under democratic governance where the rule of law prevails. The question we should be asking ourselves is: do we have such thing as DSS in our statute books? The answer is no.

“The organisation known as the DSS is an illegal body that is not recognized by the constitution or act, CAP 74 of the Laws of the Federation 1986 that addressed the extablishment of national security agencies. There is nothing in the laws that refer to DSS. It is an illegal body”.

He further said that only the Armed Forces Act was amended by President Olusegun Obasanjo. He said no other amendment has been done for other auxiliary agency. In the case of the SSS and National Intelligence Agency (NIA), they are directly responsible to the president.

“Let’s assume the DSS can take the position of the SSS, the SSS replaced the NSO in 1986 and the transition supported by an Act. Section 2:3 stipulates the functions and duties of SSS on the internal security of Nigeria, in other words, the DSS is unknown to law,”he said.

The senior lawyer stipulated that the Act provided for the Defense Intelligence Agency, National Intelligence Agency and the State Security Service with their duties spelt out under Section two explaining the functions within Nigeria against any crime concerning national security and the protection and preservation of all known military classified matters concerning national security.

According to Akintola, the entire country, including the president, is bound by the rule of law and not martial law. Nigeria, he said is under a constitutional government and even the President is bound by oath to abide by the, “constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and other extant laws”.

The approach adopted by government was faulted as contravening provisions of laws on the fundamental human rights of Nigerians where the security agency has been known to break down doors and into people’s homes. He said the constitution of institutions must be respected in the country to avoid a complete breakdown of law and order.

He further stipulated that the DSS overreached and usurped the powers of the National Judicial Council (NJC) constitutionally mandated to handle matters of disciplinary actions against judges.

“The organizations empowered to fight corruption in Nigeria was outlined as the Independent Corrupts Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC), the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Special Fraud Unit (SFU) of the Nigerian Police Force which are all under the control of the National Security Adviser (NSA),”he said, adding that the DSS has been over reaching.

Akintola said the former NSA, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), who has been in the custody of the DSS since December 2015 did not use the details of the illegality of the DSS because he probably is not aware, explaining that the EFCC and ICPC has clear mandates to fight corruption.

He said there are a lot of ignorant persons being prosecuted and there are half-truths being spoken on-air by ignorant commentators. He gave an example of a lawyer who spoke about certain actions that can be taken under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), which has not been domesticated in many states in Nigeria.

“In states like Rivers, Sokoto and Kano, ACJA cannot be applied because it has not been domesticated there. Nigeria has been so unfortunate to have been running government of illiterates, by the illiterates for the enlightened,”he stated, adding that most of Nigerian leaders, are either economic illiterates, political illiterates, legal and social illiterates, where a public officer would speak before thinking and would speak before checking the law.

To enable commenting and other interactive features, please switch to the more advanced .

MR.TWITTTER

He sounds more like an immoral legal luminary on a self-advertorial crusade or probably an agent to one of the arrested judges.EFCC,ICPC & others,take note!

Folake Vaughn

Are the judges expecting sympathy? Not from me! They have been untouchables for too long! Let the Law be followed, giving them the necessary protection they are entitled to as citizens of this country, but not impunity to continue selling justice for money.
I am certain that some judges are honest. Probably many. But those who are corrupt should answer for their deeds. Nigerians need the protection of the Law, which is blind except to facts, not to money.

absam777

As a SAN, this lawyer can never be sound, because he is part of the problem. His logic of argument is flawed. Hear he: “Let’s assume the DSS can take the position of the SSS, the SSS replaced the NSO in 1986 and the transition supported by an Act. Section 2:3 stipulates the functions and duties of SSS on the internal security of Nigeria, in other words, the DSS is unknown to law,”
Does the change of name make an organisation illegal? The SANs love to preach the Rule of Law but refuse the Enforcement of Law. Corruption is a security issue. Period.

Mr. A

So has the law been followed in this matter, I ask? It’s ok now until it’s your turn.

barriga bello

No surprise. Go down memory lane – like father like son. Akintola is a name embeded in controvercial political mess. Consider many doors, homes, families, and organizations have been destroyed by security agencies under the name of “sting operation” The penetrating question is – where were “Mr. Taku jr. and others while these were ongiong? Now the “rooster has come home to roost” and Mr. Taku jr. and co. are fuming in the mouth and shouting foul. Nonsense. George Orwell was on point – “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” Like it, hate it or both (it is prerogative)

infinity2020

You just took the words out of my mouth. Nigeria needs to make some SANDS to face the firing squad at the bar beach