Topic Summary

Posted by: Till Schönborn

I have the amd a10-4600m with the 7660g 2gb. In the comparison it showed skyrim on this setup on medium getting 29fps at 1366x720.However I can play it on high with 55-60fps easily. I'm very confused. Perhaps they have several texture mods they forgot to disable? I've only hit the sub 30fps line when trying to play on ultra. This seems Intel biased.

Hi,

you can verify all our benchmarks using the guides and videos provided in the game checks.

Posted by: Bias

This website is obviously Intel biased and it's nowhere more evident than in their description of AMD's Bulldozer architecture, in which they call cores not real cores due to them being in modules. The Core 2 Quads were also two modules of two cores, bet they won't say they aren't real quad cores due to sharing resources. The lists on this website should be taken as guides, not as absolute measure as the bias is thick and horrible.

Posted by: Typical AMD customer

I have the amd a10-4600m with the 7660g 2gb. In the comparison it showed skyrim on this setup on medium getting 29fps at 1366x720.However I can play it on high with 55-60fps easily. I'm very confused. Perhaps they have several texture mods they forgot to disable? I've only hit the sub 30fps line when trying to play on ultra. This seems Intel biased.

Posted by: darrell

Posted by: a

any serious gpu review will nowadays include frame rate variance. i think notebookcheck could be biased in favor of intel, because frame rate variance is intel's weakness and they are the only review site which does not show frame rate variance results.

Posted by: TheinsanegamerN

"Interesting that they compared the A10-4600 and not the A10-5800 or A10-6800. Coincidence... I think not. In another review I saw, those chips were beating the i7-4770K chip in gaming by 20-30% in framerates...." show me where you can find a laptop with a 5800k. ::)this is comparing the NOTEBOOK processors, desktop chips are not included for a reason.

Posted by: TimMc

Interesting that they compared the A10-4600 and not the A10-5800 or A10-6800. Coincidence... I think not. In another review I saw, those chips were beating the i7-4770K chip in gaming by 20-30% in framerates.

Posted by: Hræsvelgr

prices don't make sense..cause the grafic is included to the different processors and the price depends, on where you buy. And be sure.. no one will tell you, how much they have to pay directly to intel

Posted by: firejdhdhdhhdhdhdh

Posted by: Redaktion

There is more in it than you think. Intel has always focused on its CPU technology which has made it the undisputed leader in the market. But the GPU has always been the foster child receiving very little love until the introduction of Ivy Bridge. We will see if the latest Haswell chips with the HD Graphics 4600 can compare to the best AMD offers on its APUs.