There have been few build-ups to the Jukskei derby between the Bulls and Lions in recent times that have drawn as much anticipation as the imminent contest between the two sides at Ellis Park this weekend.

Tensions within the International Cricket Council (ICC) took a nasty turn this week with its president Mustafa Kamal threatening to expose "mischievious" deeds by some of the cricket governing body’s officials.

The 39-year-old actress first started dating the 'Blurred Lines' hitmaker, whom she officially divorced last month, when she was just 14 years old and she believes she's been forced to grow up since ending their nine-year marriage in 2014.

Britain’s Cameron rejects press law after hacking scandal

British prime minister David Cameron has rejected the idea of a law to regulate the British press, risking a split in his government after an inquiry advised legal backing for a watchdog to police the sometimes outrageous conduct of newspapers.

Save & Share

Related News

Opposing an independent regulator enshrined in law will delight the
British press ahead of the 2015 election but may raise concern inside the
coalition government that Cameron lacks the mettle to stand up to media barons such as Rupert Murdoch.

Cameron said he was wary of writing press regulation
into law, a snub to the inquiry he ordered in July last year after public
outrage at revelations that one of Murdoch’s tabloids hacked the phone messages
of a 13-year-old murder victim.

“The issue of principle is that for the first time we would have crossed
the rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land,” Cameron told parliament, watched from the gallery
by victims of phone-hacking who have campaigned for tougher rules to police Britain’s
recalcitrant media.

“I’m not convinced at this stage that statute is necessary,” Cameron said, just hours after Lord Justice Brian
Leveson reported on his inquiry which laid bare the cosy ties between British
leaders, police chiefs and press barons.

Presenting his 1 987-page report opposite the House of Commons, Leveson
said he had no intention of undermining three centuries of press freedom but
that the press had at times “wreaked havoc with the lives of innocent people”
and was sometimes guilty of “outrageous” behaviour.

Leveson said it was essential that there should be legislation to
underpin a new independent, self-regulatory body for the press that would be
scrutinised by the broadcast regulator Ofcom and have the power to impose fines
of up to 1% of turnover up to a maximum of one million pounds ($1.6 million).

“The ball moves back into the politicians’ court: they must now decide
who guards the guardians,” Leveson said.

The behaviour of Britain’s
tabloid press has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years. While British
newspapers were unwilling to report on King Edward VIII’s affair with
American divorcee Wallis Simpson in the 1930s, their conduct has since become
much less restrained in the battle for readers.

As competition intensified, the tabloids turned on the private lives of
the royal family, culminating in feverish coverage of Princess Diana, hounded
by paparazzi as her marriage to Prince Charles collapsed.

At one point in the early 1990s, a government minister warned the
tabloid press that they were “drinking in the last chance saloon”. At about the
same time the Press Complaints Commission was set up, a self-regulating
watchdog now deemed to have failed.

“I know of no organised profession, industry or trade in which the
serious failings of the few are overlooked or ignored because of the good done
by the many,” Leveson said.

‘Last chance saloon’

While Cameron
rejected immediate legislation, the leader of the opposition Labour Party said
he supported Leveson’s proposals as did Cameron’s coalition partner, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg.

“There can be no more last chance saloons,” said Labour leader Ed
Miliband, opening up the prospect of possible defeat in parliament for Cameron if Labour joined forces with supporters
of tougher rules inside the coalition parties.

In a sign of a split at the very heart of government, Clegg said
legislation was the only real way to establish a new self-regulatory body for
the press.

“Changing the law is the only way to give us all the assurance that the
new regulator isn’t just independent for a few months or years, but is
independent for good,” Clegg said.

Victims of phone hacking say the raucous media has been given no less
than seven chances to reform in the last 70 years but Leveson said the British
press had at times displayed a “reckless disregard for accuracy”.

Leveson heard evidence from a host of celebrities including Harry Potter
author JK Rowling, singer Charlotte Church and ordinary people who told the
inquiry how they had been harassed, bullied, and traumatised by the press.

Hacked Off, an organisation set up to represent victims of press abuse,
said it welcomed the Leveson report but warned Cameron’s opposition risked neutering the recommendations.

“The prime minister has not done his job. His failure to accept the full
recommendations of the report is unfortunate and regrettable,” said Brian
Cathcart, a former Reuters journalist and founder of the Hacked Off campaign.

“In tearing out from this report the element of scrutiny on the
self-regulator, he (Cameron)
has left us with only a self-regulator. That is where we were before. That is
where we have been for 60 or 70 years.”

Ultimately, Cameron
took a political decision: powerful ministers in Cameron’s party and the majority of the press have said they were adamantly
opposed to any form of legislation as they see it as an erosion of press
freedom.

Lord Guy Black, currently the head of the body which funds the current
discredited, self-regulatory system, said there was no need to subject the new
body to a statutory regime.

“Any form of statutory press control in a free society is fraught with
danger, totally impractical and would take far too long to implement,” he said.

‘Too close’

Leveson said the relationship between the cream of Britain’s
political elite and the press was too close and said he was concerned by
lobbying.

The 63-year-old judge warned that the close ties formed between the
government and Murdoch’s News Corp over the aborted takeover of BSkyB was
concerning and had the potential to jeopardise the $12 billion bid.

“We are keen to play our full part, with others in our industry, in
creating a new body that commands the confidence of the public,” said Tom
Mockridge, chief executive of Murdoch’s British newspaper arm, News
International,

“We believe that this can be achieved without statutory regulation — and
welcome the prime minister’s rejection of that proposal,” Mockridge said in a
statement.

Leveson offered little in the way of direct criticism of individuals,
ammunition for those who hoped it would condemn Cameron for his links to Murdoch’s media empire. Nor did he say there had been
any deal between the two.

He said there was no credible evidence of bias on the part of senior
minister and Cameron
ally Jeremy Hunt in his handling of the BSkyB takeover, but said the close ties
allowed a perception of favouritism.

Inquiry hearings embarrassed Cameron by exposing his close ties to executives at Murdoch’s British newspaper
empire, notably former top lieutenant Rebekah Brooks, who is facing criminal
action over phone-hacking and other alleged illegal actions.

Brooks appeared in court earlier on Thursday accused of making illegal
payments to public officials.

Four prime ministers including Cameron were quizzed in great detail about their links to newspaper owners,
especially Murdoch, who himself endured two days of grilling, during which he
denied playing puppet-master to those running the country.