Checked the signing and m5.Docs look good w/ proper versions.Ran on six node cluster.Wrote 10M rows.Verified they were all there.Did it again killing a node and they were still there when all came backand MR job completed.

> Friendly reminder to please have a look at this release and vote.>> Thanks.>> -- Lars>>>> ________________________________> From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:10 PM> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.8 release candidate is available> for download>>> The 1st 0.94.8 RC is available for download at> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.8-rc0/> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328>> Like the previous point releases, 0.94.8 is a primarily a bug fix release.> This RC has 45 issues resolved against it, contributed by 22 individuals.>> The full list of changes is available here:> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and> vote +1/-1 by May 30th on whether we should release this as 0.94.8.>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdFNYanpaVUpad0NwV01qWlNRbTlwbUE#gid=0> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so> that we can gauge the coverage)>> Thanks.>> -- Lars>

-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.8 release candidate is available for download

Downloaded the file (non-security version);Checked the signature;Checked the archive;Checked the changes.txtChecked the documentation (Seems to be missing the style sheet);Ran the tests locally, passed.Results :

Did not got a chance to deploy it on my cluster and ETA seems to beend of day today... will not have time before Sunday.

So +1 from what I was able to test so far.

2013/5/30 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> +1>> Checked the signing and m5.> Docs look good w/ proper versions.> Ran on six node cluster.> Wrote 10M rows.> Verified they were all there.> Did it again killing a node and they were still there when all came back> and MR job completed.>> St.Ack>>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:25 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look at this release and vote.>>>> Thanks.>>>> -- Lars>>>>>>>> ________________________________>> From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:10 PM>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.8 release candidate is available>> for download>>>>>> The 1st 0.94.8 RC is available for download at>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.8-rc0/>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328>>>> Like the previous point releases, 0.94.8 is a primarily a bug fix release.>> This RC has 45 issues resolved against it, contributed by 22 individuals.>>>> The full list of changes is available here:>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and>> vote +1/-1 by May 30th on whether we should release this as 0.94.8.>>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdFNYanpaVUpad0NwV01qWlNRbTlwbUE#gid=0>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so>> that we can gauge the coverage)>>>> Thanks.>>>> -- Lars>>

-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.8 release candidate is available for download

testConcurrentMetaScannerAndCatalogJanitor(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestMetaScanner):Split daughter regiontestConcurrentMetaScannerAndCatalogJanitor,b\x7F\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF,1369898569267.c14ad7c819b83a6c627d344a9bd2184f.cannot be found in META.

testConcurrentMetaScannerAndCatalogJanitor(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestMetaScanner):Split daughter regiontestConcurrentMetaScannerAndCatalogJanitor,b\x7F\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF\xFF,1369898569267.c14ad7c819b83a6c627d344a9bd2184f.cannot be found in META.

Yes, our jenkins running 0.94.6 also sees green light nearly all of thetime. I did not inspect the failures to see whether they are environmentalor due to flakiness. There is bunch of work that went into fixing thosetests in trunk, maybe we should start backporting those.

Basically did the following-> Ran the testcases with hadoop 1. Did not get any failures.-> Started the 0.94.8 with hadoop 1 in distributed mode.-> Ran load test tool and multiple writer and reader threads.-> Scanned the data.-> Killed the RS and again restarted it.-> did some flushing and compactions.Logs looked clean.

Things came up fine. So with this basic testing +1 on the RC from my side.