How to help

Manycompassionatefriends, relativesand acquaintanceshave turnedto variousauthorities and agenciesto helpus in the face of our current tragedywith our children. Anyone canhelpand anyhelp is needed, and it isnot insignificant.

Ifyou enjoy writing, you can write letters tooneorall of the followingauthorities. One can sometimesalready clearexpress hisopinionwith 3 sentences. Do not think, “Icannot change anythinganyway“! Please do not besilent;talk toyourneighborsorfriendsabout it!

So ifyou want to writean opinion in favorof our children, below can be found afterthe addresses of the newspapers(only examples) andthe decision makers at variouslevels. You canwrite something about individual familiesyou knowpersonallyand/orforthe community at large. We would be happy about it, get a copyofyour letterandif you agree(please clearlytell), we wouldpublishyour letterwith your initialson our website, as oftenletters to the editorhave simplynot been published when they in our favor.

We would liketo thankall of you whosupport us, again!

From the families of the Twelve Tribes.

Below these addresses are the proper numbers to write on any letters concerning individual families.*

*Using these numbers is important, because as we reported on April 17…”Recently, we learned to our dismay that all these letters to the offices and courts were not taken into consideration for the simple reason that no document number was written upon them.”

The respective file numbers of the families

Amtsgericht Nördlingen

Preliminary Hearings

Main Hearings

Hennigfeld

001 F 432/13

001 F 551/13

Krumbacher

002 F 435/13

002 F 586/13

Markeli

002 F 439/13

002 F 611/13

Müller

002 F 446/13

002 F 602/13

Periskic

002 F 430/13

002 F 576/13

Pfeiffer

002 F 441/13

002 F 612/13

Remmache

002 F 445/13

002 F 606/13

Schott

002 F 436/13

002 F 604/13

Schüle

002 F 440/13

002 F 607/13

Stark

002 F 437/13

002 F 609/13

Wetjen

002 F 433/13

002 F 608/13

Amtsgericht Ansbach

Preliminary Hearings

Main Hearings

Pingen

1 F 976/13

1 F 1015/13

Serrano

1 F 971/13

1 F 1011/13

Tlapak N.

1 F 973/13

1 F 1013/13

Note that the families in Klosterzimmern were divided between two judges, splitting the alphabetical listing of their last names in half. . . and not simply equally dividing the whole group into two equal or nearly-equal sizes. So one judge had one family and the other judge had ten families. It’s baffling why this was done, but the effect of it was to keep some parents from their children for a long time, because the parents could not see their children, typically, until after the case had come up in court.