This blog is for parents interested in education and the 11 Plus Exam for children in the UK. We provide comment, tips and advice for parents with children studying for the 11 Plus Exam.

Search This Blog

Thursday, March 01, 2012

Eleven Plus Intelligence

Spearman, back in 1904, wrote on `General Intelligence’. He was writing well before the eleven plus emerged
– but some of his observations seem to be relevant even today.

He felt that the first part of intelligence was to do with
mental activity - as shown at school. He was concerned with the relationship
between subjects. The eleven plus also
revolves round examining a relatively narrow field of reasoning ability.

Then Spearman was concerned with school order. He looked at
the difference between a child’s rank at school and the child’s age. He was
concerned with absolute rather than relative differences. A boy who was 20th
in the examination and 22nd by age would be placed just above one
who was 15th in the examination and 16th by age. The
former was two better than the latter who was only one better. If eleven plus
parents think that this is unfair – then listen to some eleven plus stories!

The third kind of intelligence was to do with the general
impression produced upon people. Teachers, for example, used to classify
children as being `bright’, `average’ and `dull’. No politically correct
teacher would dare to go down this route today. Would, however, opinions of
grandparents be excluded?

The fourth and last sort of intelligence was to do what is
known as `common sense’. Does an examination candidate really need to be able
to have common sense? A child with oodles of common sense would probably do
very well in an eleven plus examination!

What Spearman did was enter all the results into a great and
complex equation. He tried to eliminate irrelevant factors. In the end Spearman
wondered if there was something like a General Sensory Discrimination and a General
Intelligence. He thought that there was common fundamental function which
unified intelligence.

In the end, way back in 904, he felt that measuring mental
activity depended on: