Students supporting professor after inconsistencies in sex assault report surface

CU - Boulder formalized its intent to dismiss Professor David Barnett last week.

"Barnett never, ever told me who he thought was guilty or innocent, or who he thought was right or wrong,” a student close to the case said. “He just noticed inconsistencies in the report."

Several students have stepped forward to defend Barnett.

Last week the University of Colorado formalized its intent to dismiss Philosophy Professor David Barnett, claiming his independent 38-page report inappropriately suggested an alleged sexual assault victim had “promiscuous habits.”

However, things could be shifting in the professor’s favor as a witness present the night of alleged assault—a friend to both the alleged assailant and victim—came forward in Barnett’s defense.

"That [Barnett] has retaliated or smeared the name of [the victim] is false."

Philosophy student Kyra Rehman says Barnett approached her to discuss the testimony she provided to the Office of Harassment and Discrimination (OHD) regarding his former mentee, the alleged perpetrator. She says they only discussed the OHD’s findings and her testimony.

"At no point did Barnett make any judgments on anyone involved in the case," Rehman told the Daily Camera. "Our conversation was purely related to ODH and the way they handled this."

The two shared similar concerns regarding inconsistencies between the ODH’s findings and their depiction of her testimony.

"Barnett never, ever told me who he thought was guilty or innocent, or who he thought was right or wrong,” Rehman said. “He just noticed inconsistencies in the report."

Rebecca Chan, a doctoral student in the Philosophy department, said she felt the university was exaggerating its claims against Barnett.

"That [Barnett] has retaliated or smeared the name of [the victim] is false," said Chan.

Chan says she felt comfortable going to Barnett with personal and professional advice and believes he even helped “save” a student who had suicidal intent.

CU has emphasized the importance of keeping the case details confidential among employees. It says it rarely undertakes such processes and is taking the allegations very seriously.

"The BFA [Boulder Faculty Assembly] is committed to making sure all faculty have the opportunity to have their cases appealed as outlined by the regents' (policies) and we support the process being followed in this specific case,” said BFA chairman Paul Chinowsky.

Maggie Lit is an Outreach Manager at the Herald Group. Prior to this role, Maggie was a reporter covering liberal bias and abuse for Campus Reform, and also wrote for The Daily Caller and Radio America. During her time in college, Maggie produced content for politically conservative news outlets including The Daily Caller, Radio America, and CBS Denver.

A student at Florida State University (FSU) has become an Internet sensation for her rap videos and artistic works about menstruation, rape culture and feminist issues, all funded by the school’s grant money.

“The history of police violence against black people is as long as the history of policing itself; arguably, the first organized police forces in the US were slave patrols in South Carolina," the syllabus says.

“The procedure is the same as we have done in the past with the addition of arming the students with a canned food item. We realize at first this may seem odd; however, it is a practice that would catch an intruder off-guard.”

"Eventually, I figured it might be interesting to explore a day in my life in Barcelona: American Privilege Edition. I woke up and ate a couple Ritz crackers I bought last night. Check. Turned on the radio and jammed to the new Taylor Swift song. Check."

“Abbate, of course, was just using a tactic typical among liberals now. Opinions with which they disagree are not merely wrong, and are not to be argued against on their merits, but are deemed ‘offensive’ and need to be shut up.”

CampusReform.org is a project of the Leadership Institute. The Leadership Institute is a non-partisan educational organization approved by the Internal Revenue Service as a public foundation operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. The Leadership Institute does not endorse, support, or oppose candidates or proposed legislation. The Institute has an open admissions policy; all programs are open to the public. Contributions to the Leadership Institute by individuals, corporations, and foundations are tax deductible.
WEB25