In this series we’ll take a fresh look at resources and how they are used. We’ll go beyond natural resources like air and water to look at how efficiency in raw materials can boost the bottom line and help the environment. We’ll also examine the circular economy and design for reuse — with an eye toward honoring those resources we do have.

While changes at home can’t solve the many environmental crises we face today, they can sure help. Through this series, we’ll explore how initiatives like curbside compost pick-up, rebates on compost bins, and efficient appliances can help families reduce their impact without breaking the bank.

Despite decades -- centuries even -- of global efforts, slavery can still be found not just on the high seas, but around the world and throughout various supply chains. Through this series on forced labor, sponsored by C&A Foundation, we’ll explore many different types of bonded and forced labor and highlight industries where this practice is alive and well today.

In this series we examine how companies should respond to national controversy like police violence and the BLM movement to best support employees and how can companies work to improve equality by increasing diversity in their ranks directly.

Compost is often considered a panacea for the United States’ tremendous food waste problem. Indeed, composting is a much better option than putting spoiled food in a garbage can destined for a landfill.

Maybe we should just file this one from the continuing fracking saga under the “just do as I say, not as I do” file.

But it’s still pretty delicious: According to various news reports, including the Wall Street Journal, Rex Tillerson, ExxonMobil’s chairman and CEO, is part of a lawsuit seeking to block construction of a 160-foot water tower adjacent to his and his wife’s Bartonville, Texas home. The tower will supply water to a nearby hydraulic fracturing site.

Tillerson and his neighbors contend the tower is illegal and will create “a noise nuisance and traffic hazards,” in part because it will supply water that is needed for the fracking project. Fracking, which requires heavy trucks to haul and pump massive amounts of water, unlocks oil and gas from dense rock. It is widely cited as at least a mid-term answer to U.S. energy output needs, and one that’s supposedly less environmentally harsh than oil drilling and extraction.

Fracking also happens to be a core part of ExxonMobil’s core business these days.

But apparently the joys and benefits of fracking become another story entirely when the project is in your backyard or down the street: A story about property values, noise and traffic, even when you are the CEO of a company that is the biggest natural gas producer in the U.S.

After all, Tillerson’s $5 million property value might be harmed by the tower. Though his name is on the lawsuit, a lawyer representing him said in the WSJ article that Tillerson’s concern is about the devaluation of his property, not fracking specifically. Maybe there’s a distinction there somewhere.

As the ExxonMobil CEO, Tillerson has criticized fracking opponents and proponents of better fracking regulation. “This type of dysfunctional regulation is holding back the American economic recovery, growth, and global competitiveness,” he said in 2012. Natural gas production “is an old technology just being applied, integrated with some new technologies,” he said in another interview. “So the risks are very manageable.”

The Bartonville water tower has been controversial and the subject of permit disputes for several years. Last November, Tillerson addressed the town’s council, telling officials that he and his wife, Renda, settled in Bartonville to enjoy a rural lifestyle and invested millions in their property after satisfying themselves that nothing would be built above their tree line, according to the council’s audio recording of the meeting.

Allowing the tower in defiance of town ordinances could open the door to runaway development and might prompt him to leave town, he said. “I cannot stay in a place,” he said, “where I do not know who to count on and who not to count on.”

That sounds a little threatening, but why should we count on intellectual honesty from ExxonMobil’s head guy–isn’t consistency the hobgoblin of little minds?

2 responses

Taking about intellectual honesty….no one said this water tower is for fracking. We all approved it when it was permitted to be 36 ft tall. The private water company decided they would build a 160 ft tower in violation of their permit and zoning. The only person that said this was for fracking was the misleading author of the WSJ article who asked the lawyer if it was about fracking. The lawyer said no. But here you are, claiming it is. Do you have a link to where the Crossstimbers water company states they must have 160 ft water tower for fracking? The city is suing because it is in violation of code and permit; the private water company says they can build whatever they want because they are a utility. The second lawsuit is for personal damages to the landowners around the property. We have zoning laws for a reason. Just like Arlington Virginia has zoning laws restricting height. Just like other cities have development restrictions to prevent massive housing developments. You assume because we do not like the height, its because of fracking. You assume that one water tower approved at 36 ft cannot be used for fracking but a 160 ft water can.