Face Facts. Barack Obama Is The Islamic-Fascist Stealth Candidate.

Like this:

Related

Responses

You have no facts.

Even if Obama’s mother had become an indonesian citizen (for which there is no evidence), and renounced Obama’s American citizenship on his behalf (for which there is no evidence), he would still be entitled to American citizenship, unless he failed to establish a permanent residence in America before the age of 25, which he did.

Section 349(a) of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, Title III, Chapter 3, which would have been in effect when Barack Obama moved to Indonesia and later returned to the US, states:

“From and after the effective date of this Act a person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by — (1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application, upon an application filed in his behalf by a parent, or duly authorized agent, or through the naturalization of a parent having legal custody of such person: Provided, That nationality shall not be lost by any person under this section as the result of the naturalization of a parent or parents while such person is under the age of twenty-one years, or as the result of naturalization obtained on behalf of a person under twenty-one years of age by a parent, guardian, or duly authorized agent, unless such person shall fail to enter the United States to establish a permanent residence prior to his twenty-fifth birthday: ….”

and Section 355 states:
“A person having United States nationality, who is under the age of twenty-one and whose residence is in a foreign state with or under the legal custody of a parent who hereafter loses United States nationality under section 350 or 352 of this title, shall also lose his United States nationality if such person has or acquires the nationality of such foreign state: Provided, That, in such case, United States nationality shall not be lost as the result of loss of United States nationality by the parent unless and until the person attains the age of twenty-five years without having established his residence in the United States.”

“To be eligibile a person must be willing and able to prove eligibility.”
Where is that written in the constitution? or in any relevant law or court decision?
Say I launched a lawsuit that claimed that Obama was ineligible because he’s secretly an alien from Mars. I don’t provide any evidence for this, I just say that if he doesn’t show up in court to prove it, it shows he’s not willing or able to prove it. is that reasonable?

David Icke will tell you that George W Bush is ineligible to be president because he’s a giant lizard. Does GWB have to drop everything and submit to scientific tests in order to show he’s willing and able to prove that he’s not a giant lizard?

Don’t be stupid man. If you seek eligibility to, lets say, get into Australia. Well you need a passport and a visa. But if you show up and refuse to show your passport and your visa then you are not eligible. Doesn’t matter if they POTENTIALLY all check out. You are not eligible.

Matters could not be otherwise.

Hence if someone wants to get into Australia its pointless people saying YOU CANNOT PROVE HE HASN’T GOT A VISA AND A PASSPORT. Thats just silly. Grow up.

So therefore its just a fact that to be eligible you must be both willing and able to prove it. Well Obama isn’t willing. Nor is he able. So he’s stonewalling. And he appears to have enough foreign backing that he might well be able to pull it off.