(17-07-2012 12:28 AM)fstratzero Wrote: You have to provide better evidence.

Not buying your young one a pet is really no big deal.

Either Katie was teaching Suri how to act, or she is setting-up Tom Cruise to pay for a dog walker. NYC, people like Katie and Suri cannot be expected to walk their dog as often as the dog needs to be walked; and besides that people like Katie and Suri cannot be expected to pick up their dog's shit when they do walk the dog in the city - maybe once, or twice for public relation, but beyond that it is beneath their dignity - don't you think?

Humanism - ontological doctrine that posits that humans define realityTheism - ontological doctrine that posits a supernatural entity creates and defines realityAtheism - political doctrine opposed to theist doctrine in public policy
I am right, and you are wrong - I hope you die peacefully

(17-07-2012 12:28 AM)fstratzero Wrote: You have to provide better evidence.

Not buying your young one a pet is really no big deal.

Either Katie was teaching Suri how to act, or she is setting-up Tom Cruise to pay for a dog walker. NYC, people like Katie and Suri cannot be expected to walk their dog as often as the dog needs to be walked; and besides that people like Katie and Suri cannot be expected to pick up their dog's shit when they do walk the dog in the city - maybe once, or twice for public relation, but beyond that it is beneath their dignity - don't you think?

Because Tom or Katie, multi-millionaires, can't afford a dog walker?

You know, I've seen a lot of bad trolls over the years but this is just plain lazy.

No, I'm saying that Katie is setting-up Cruise to pay for the dog service, by forcing him to be the parent who buys the dog. Where as Katie wants to be as economical as possible with her end of responsibility.

Katie and Suri, and subsequently Tom, cannot be expected to walk their dog as often as need be because when they go out of the house it requires some amount of a security detail, and that security detail is probably not going to pick up the dog shit, unless they get extra compensation. And chances are, being millionaires and possibly because of some promises Tom has made, because of his Scientology teachings, he probably has made promises like, "the best dog trainer for a dog for Suri . . ."

Let's try to get our forum master, Stark Raving, to maybe give us some details considering he is a dog training expert. Certainly he would suggest that the best thing a person can do for a dog is have it properly trained and cared for. I would think that with Tom Cruise, and his use of Scientology, would inform him to understand that, compared to Katie and Suri's who would probably have a less than sophisticated appreciation of the need for expert training and care.

Humanism - ontological doctrine that posits that humans define realityTheism - ontological doctrine that posits a supernatural entity creates and defines realityAtheism - political doctrine opposed to theist doctrine in public policy
I am right, and you are wrong - I hope you die peacefully

I bet they're going to get Suri a puppy, and a dog trainer for the puppy.

Humanism - ontological doctrine that posits that humans define realityTheism - ontological doctrine that posits a supernatural entity creates and defines realityAtheism - political doctrine opposed to theist doctrine in public policy
I am right, and you are wrong - I hope you die peacefully

No, I'm saying that Katie is setting-up Cruise to pay for the dog service, by forcing him to be the parent who buys the dog. Where as Katie wants to be as economical as possible with her end of responsibility.

Katie and Suri, and subsequently Tom, cannot be expected to walk their dog as often as need be because when they go out of the house it requires some amount of a security detail, and that security detail is probably not going to pick up the dog shit, unless they get extra compensation. And chances are, being millionaires and possibly because of some promises Tom has made, because of his Scientology teachings, he probably has made promises like, "the best dog trainer for a dog for Suri . . ."

Let's try to get our forum master, Stark Raving, to maybe give us some details considering he is a dog training expert. Certainly he would suggest that the best thing a person can do for a dog is have it properly trained and cared for. I would think that with Tom Cruise, and his use of Scientology, would inform him to understand that, compared to Katie and Suri's who would probably have a less than sophisticated appreciation of the need for expert training and care.

No, let's ask Stark to just delete this pointless, foolish thread.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.

(17-07-2012 03:58 PM)Stark Raving Wrote: Let's leave stark out of it all together.

Yeah, what's the problem - it's not like I am asking you to perjure yourself.

You are an expert on dogs - what are the best recommendations you could make for people contemplating owning a dog, besides recommending that they not take on the responsibility?

Humanism - ontological doctrine that posits that humans define realityTheism - ontological doctrine that posits a supernatural entity creates and defines realityAtheism - political doctrine opposed to theist doctrine in public policy
I am right, and you are wrong - I hope you die peacefully