I see why you're a Trumpster, you sound just like him. NOW for a little surprise son, maybe I for once agree with you. Ever thought about the fact that dozens of individuals are being investigated as we speak, including Trump's son-in-law, a mental challenge for you, if you're POTUS and the FBI, Central intelligence etc. states to you that they have significant evident that the Russians are hacking our electronic infrastructure, what would you do if the purported incidents were originating from the Trump Tower besides lie in your response?

To add to your wild spin of spying just for the sake of spying, lets indulge you a little. A Black man had the audacity to run for POTUS and the people had the audacity to vote for him.....I'll be "whipped if he didn't win that DAGGONE thang" Now Tommy, remember the back room deals involving key Republicans who were not only surprised but very incensed that Obama won. Don't think for a moment that these same individuals didn't ILLEGALLY wiretapped Obama's personal life looking for anything and everything to impeach this man, unlike Trump, the loud mouthed fool stated in front of millions of viewer, please Mr. Putin, hack Hillary's E-Mail, yes the fool invited the FBI and the CIA as well to get involved.Too bad that logic fails you and Trump. Maybe your ignorant POTUS is aiming his "ignorance" at the wrong entity.

After Donald Trump claimed President Obama had tapped Trump’s phones prior to the 2016 election, a congressman from California, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), tweeted if that’s true, if Trump’s phone calls were tapped, Trump is in “deep sh*t” and may want to lawyer up because that would mean a federal judge would have found probably cause of a crime. A little later in the day, Lieu also tweets that Trump’s admission will be the catalyst to a congressional probe.

After Donald Trump claimed President Obama had tapped Trump’s phones prior to the 2016 election, a congressman from California, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), tweeted if that’s true, if Trump’s phone calls were tapped, Trump is in “deep sh*t” and may want to lawyer up because that would mean a federal judge would have found probably cause of a crime. A little later in the day, Lieu also tweets that Trump’s admission will be the catalyst to a congressional probe.

You are actually this stupid, and to think, I believed that you were feigning stupidity. You gave us the law, no president can illegally tap a private citizen's personal life but in your own buffoonery you once again played a Trump, if a security agency suspects illegal activities, they in turn inform the Commander In Chief and Court Justice of said activities, where does it go from there son? I know, everyone just sits on it like the Trump administration wish could happen now.

I feel the need to clarify my statement, the correct pronunciation is Comedy of errors but I choose to invert it due to the fact that Tommy attempts to create a diversion by going to a "headline making announcement" only to have another error in judgement which is becoming all too comical.

In actuality, millions of people knew that Trump was under surveillance, one of the reason he got 3 million votes less than Hillary, the only surprise? the fool received more electoral and it may come to light as well that Russian interference stole those.

I wish I were a fly on the wall at Trump's Florida home at this present time, imagine the screaming, profanity, fist pounding, hair flying, a** reaming and to think, that's directed at the maids serving his dinner before Jeff Session arrive for his own personal meeting.

During the Vietnam War there was a popular slogan: "Suppose they gave a war and nobody came?"

On Saturday, President Donald Trump posed a new question: Suppose the commander-in-chief declared a massive political scandal — and nobody cared?

It was an explosive allegation that raised immediate questions about both the Obama administration's behavior and the status of investigations into Trump associates' relationship to Russia, which the intelligence community has accused of a hacking campaign to aid Trump politically.

And then ... not much happened.

The White House didn't outwardly treat the president's public accusations against a former president as particularly urgent business either. As of Saturday evening, his staff had not put out any follow-up statements.

Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis said neither Obama nor any White House official ever ordered any surveillance of Trump or any U.S. citizen, but did not address whether such surveillance had occurred.

In ordinary times, such an accusation would send both parties and the White House scrambling into action with demands and counter-demands for an immediate investigation. But Trump is not an ordinary president and the initial response from his own side was so muted as to barely be audible.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker Paul Ryan did not respond to requests for comment Saturday, although Ryan told Fox News on Friday that he did not think the Obama administration surveilled Trump's campaign aides.

The other side didn't seem too compelled to respond either. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, the ranking Democrat of the House Intelligence Committee, called Trump's claim "outlandish and destructive" in a statement.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California, issued a single tweet calling Trump "Deflector-in-Chief" and reiterating her call for an independent commission. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, gave no public comment at all as of Saturday evening.

What happened? They had seen this movie before. First, the president issues an incendiary claim. Then, a firestorm erupts. When the smoke settles, it becomes clear the president was making a charge without evidence to back it up, often by parroting a sympathetic commentator or a fringe supporter.

The president's past eruptions often followed a difficult news cycle. The current questions swirling around Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who had recused himself from any investigation involving the Trump campaign after failing to mention conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, clearly fit the bill.

In short, it was business as usual. But the fact that this pattern had become so established, so normal, was on its own a shocking moment in American politics.

LOL, so true, the "cryer in chief" worries more about the media than foreign dictators. Mr. thin-skinned hides in his winter resort, screaming because he has been exposed in regard to his lies, cheating and unethical affairs while the country deals with increased anti Semitic acts and protesters clashing on the streets. Remember that state address on Tuesday? after all the debacles and stumbles since then, who can remember what he said?