In two studies, findings showed that the extent to which a woman was relationally attached (i.e. felt close to the other members of her group) was sufficient to explain the group’s importance to her. In contrast, men’s ratings of group importance depended upon the extent of both relational and collective attachment (i.e.attached to the group identity).

Men perceive the bigger picture. Women primarily perceive their feelz. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing… until the scope of women’s influence extends beyond their immediate childcare-recruiting social group to the scale of a nation, with all that entails (e.g., border control).

One interesting consequence of women’s lack of interest in a group’s collective identity is that it may lead to important sex differences in group-related outcomes. For example, if women value a group based only on their attachment to individual members of that group, then their group membership may be less stable than men’s. Prentice et al. (1994) suggest that groups with strong common identity attachments may last longer because their existence is less contingent on good relations between current group members. It is possible that this extends to individual group membership as well. The importance that men place on a group’s identity may result in greater longevity and stability in the face of changing group membership. If common bonds dissolve, men may remain in a group for its sense of common identity, whereas the group would lose all value for women.

What is the practical meaning of this? Women care mostly about close people, their “circle” , and not about larger groups based on common identity. If her lover is from another group, then she will (most likely) no longer care about her original group (her ethnicity).

Women are more trusting of foreigners and friends who are not from their ethnicity. In contrast, men are less trusting of foreigners and friends who are not from their ethnicity.
Among children and adolescents, female play-groups tend to emphasize interpersonal interactions (relatives, friends), while male play-groups emphasize teams and large groups (tribes).

Basically, women are loyal only to close people who directly benefit them. Men, in comparison, are also loyal to people with common identity (their own tribe).

Loyalty is a mostly alien concept to women. They JUST DON’T GET IT.

Thus, we can expect any ethnic group with large female influence and female leadership to self destroy, as the female leadership will not care about preserving their own ethnicity or group cohesion, leading to the feminised group opening their borders, accepting anyone in, and eventually becoming a minority in their own country.

Mutter Merkel is a childless spinster. That alone should have disqualified her from running a country.

This could also be observed in the real world. All currently feminised groups have open borders policies and are becoming minorities in their own countries. Sweden, the most feminised country on the planet, took more refugees per capita than anyone else. In contrast, less feminised ethnic groups (Eastern Europeans, Muslims, Israeli Jews, East Asians) have closed borders and are more openly nationalist and xenophobic.

Like I’ve written before, feminization of culture and politics can be beneficial to the stability of a nation when it’s exploited during high T times to mitigate the worst excesses of rugged, expansionist, lassez faire, free-for-all masculinity. But those times are rare and brief. When societal feminization hits an inflection point of weepy vaginatude, and establishes itself deep into every institution’s nook and cranny, the result is Death of the Nation… invasion by migrant foreigners, gibsmedats are far as the eye can see, and glorification of the feminine vices at the expense of the masculine virtues.

The results of this study are interesting in that they somewhat contradict tangential studies of the online dating market which have found that women, especially White women, prefer to date same-race men. In fact, White women, if those OKCupid data analyses are to be believed, are the most racist group of prospective daters.

Maybe these conflicting findings can be reconciled by understanding that online dating market environments like OKCupid are evolutionarily atypical, aridly calculating simulacra of the real world contexts in which women sift through potential mates. Online, women have to fill in profile information explicitly asking for mate preferences, but in the hustle and bustle of the meat market women are buffeted by an extraordinary array of male mate value signals (Game) that affect their choices.

Online, a White woman, given time to mull it over in her head, will state a preference for White men, but offline (aka 99.99999999999999% of the time in which human interaction evolved) her choices will be susceptible to the frothy currents of social spindrift, and in that environment she’ll choose whichever intimate relations — native or migrant — best satisfy her immediate needs.

PS Women’s differently evolved group cohesion strategy partly explains why White wives vote more like their Republican husbands than like their Democrat single lady friends. Once married, a woman’s husband is her MOST INTIMATE relation, which means she will adopt her husband’s views as her own as her prime feminine directive subconsciously instructs her to do.

Looks like the Khalifa of Arabischland wants her people (the real ones) to either general strike her out of office or lynch her from the nearest lamp post or mass-emigrate elsewhere.
Here’s hoping she gets her wish, one way or the other.

Ah, Finland….how we will miss you when you’re part of Eurabia.
If I recall them correctly – and I’m sure I do – Finnish girls have nothing to worry about from the Russkies, they’re some of the most gorgeous anywhere.
A little shy at first, but VERY friendly thereafter.

Hey dumbass. You have a duty to your fellow countrymen and not more immigrants cause grandad was an immigrant. Jesus you’re a dumb fuck faggot. This is why Voxday doesn’t trust immigrants and he’s 100% right. “I was an immigrant so we should let in more immigrats” If you went to dinner that a friend invited you to and brought 8 other friends cause “I was invited it’s only right I invite everyone” You’d be ridiculed as the piece of shit that you are

TSW, that’s just ridiculous. There’s nothing hypocritical about opposing foreigners illegally entering your country just because you had ancestors who entered legally.

You seem to be implying that people have a duty and loyalty to countries that their ancestors come from over the country that they were born and raised in. Unfortunately there are a lot of people who agree with you.

There is a YUUUUGE difference between a few High IQ/Beautiful White women from White countries and a bunch of illiterate goat-f-ckers and cannibal Africans*. For example, one rapefugee raped an eight year old (White) boy in an Austrian public swimming pool, explaining it was “an emergency rape” because he hadn’t had sex in two months.

*In 2006, the governments of ECOWAS united to beg their citizens to please not kill and eat pygmies, as it would not in fact give them magic powers. Two years later they issued the same communique regarding Albinos.

Working out is good for you; running a marathon every day is suicide. There is such a thing as moderation.

We’ve noticed.
Had his grandfather been from Ghana, mom from the Philippines, first wife from Papua New Guinea (unlikely, but humor me….), second wife from Pakistan…..he wouldn’t be runnin fo’ no Prez, yo, he be runnin’ from da HEAT, YO!
Nomsain?

Just finished watching Trump’s rally in Carmel, IN. High energy! Relaxed, cracking jokes, blowing kisses to the audience, praising the guys that trolled Cruz earlier today, slowly starting on Hillary too. He knows that it’s over and IN tomorrow will be the final nail in GOP’s coffin.

This explains white women, and even Latin and Asian women. But what about black women? They won’t date outside the tribe for nothing. I know there’s the element of insecurity, considering they’re widely recognized as the least attractive women on the planet, but there’s something more to it. They’re more tribal than anyone else.

Jewnnifer Manjawnniston’s Jew is really showing as she ages. Hideous beast. Jewish People just named her most beautiful woman.

Lolzozoz.

Same Tribe that praises Bruce Jenner and pretends to think faggot detectives’ right to enter girls’ bathroom is number one news story now, right now, after Trump has made the backlash from normals clear.

I wrote a longer response but it got sucked into the black hole. In short, the J3ws all have some degree of mental illness (which explains their over fascination with psychology). Of course, no studies of that will produced by J3ws who will not show the ‘chosen ones’ in a bad light, or by non-J3ws out of fear of being labelled anti-s3m3tic and effectively blackballed from working in the profession again.

I believe the educated black women, who have decent jobs, would (and do) date outside of their (evolutionarily dead-end race). The ghetto black women do not for good reasons: (1) they have lower IQs and are more primal. I would not call what they do with black men “dating”. It is more like jungle mating behavior. Totally dysfunctional. (2) Black women in the hood realize that blacks are very in-group, and that light-skinned blacks (especially those who are clearly 1/2 breeds) become targets for violence and bullying in the black community because, in general, they are more attractive (including having much nicer ‘hair’) and more intelligent. They may have even participated in such violence and bullying. Knowing that the chances are high (as they usually are, too) that they and their spawn will most likely stay in ‘da hood’, why create a target for such violence.

“Esssra Klein: You said being a democratic socialist means a more international view. I think if you take global poverty that seriously, it leads you to conclusions that in the US are considered out of political bounds. Things like sharply raising the level of immigration we permit, even up to a level of open borders. About sharply increasing …

Bernie Sanders: Open borders? No, that’s a Koch brothers proposal.

Esssra Klein: Really?

Bernie Sanders: Of course. That’s a right-wing proposal, which says essentially there is no United States. …

Esssra Klein: But it would make …

Bernie Sanders: Excuse me …

Esssra Klein: It would make a lot of global poor richer, wouldn’t it?

Bernie Sanders: It would make everybody in America poorer —you’re doing away with the concept of a nation state, and I don’t think there’s any country in the world that believes in that. If you believe in a nation state or in a country called the United States or UK or Denmark or any other country, you have an obligation in my view to do everything we can to help poor people. What right-wing people in this country would love is an open-border policy. Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour, that would be great for them. I don’t believe in that. I think we have to raise wages in this country, I think we have to do everything we can to create millions of jobs.

You know what youth unemployment is in the United States of America today? If you’re a white high school graduate, it’s 33 percent, Hispanic 36 percent, African American 51 percent. You think we should open the borders and bring in a lot of low-wage workers, or do you think maybe we should try to get jobs for those kids?

I think from a moral responsibility we’ve got to work with the rest of the industrialized world to address the problems of international poverty, but you don’t do that by making people in this country even poorer.

Esssra Klein: Then what are the responsibilities that we have? Someone who is poor by US standards is quite well off by, say, Malaysian standards, so if the calculation goes so easily to the benefit of the person in the US, how do we think about that responsibility?”

Interview is from last July, but again it shows how Trump can portray himself to Bernie supporters as the only remaining candidate with the same anti-globalist position as Bernie does in this interview.

At the same time, Esssra’s unctuous cant shows how little libs differ from neocons who absolutely will not stop until the US is dragged down to third world living standards, either out of ideological lunacy or because they want another Gulfstream or both. Forget Megyn Kelly; Trump should get Klein to interview him. I’m sure all the people trying to make ends meet while under attack from both above and below are just dying to be lectured by Wesley Mouch about muh responsibilities to Malaysia.

That interview with Sanders was last July. He no longer holds those views (you can’t in the modern Democratic Party). Sanders came out for de facto open borders in one of the Dem debates; Wet foot/Dry foot. If they get here, they can stay. And if they have family here, they can stay.

It is simple. Scratch a Neo-con and you quickly find the Trotskyite underneath. Most are “reformed democrats” who “saw the light” and understood the need for a “strong military”. Translation being they were communist that weren’t Stalinist, hiding out and dragging the Democrats leftward. They also (after 1948) wanted to shore up Israel, which meant the need for funds into the military industrial complex. With the fall of the Berlin Wall, they worked to revive Trotsky’s dream of world revolution, changing the label to democratic revolution…. which has worked out so wonderfully that it has further bankrupted the USA (paving the way for more socialism amongst the pseudo-intelligentsia that graduate from the corrupted halls of edumacation and the imported rabble from the various places we have brought democratic revolution too).

Black women are notorious for being the most masculine of all women, which is why they are the least attractive; flip side being Black men the most attractive. Your average Black woman has IMHO more testosterone than your average NE Asian man, certainly more aggressive, more stupid, more prone to violence, particularly when it is obvious violence is a losing proposition for her.

See: The Williams “Sisters” for the masculine archetype of Black women.

I have found that black women (I am talking women who have 3/4 black genes or higher) who have some attractive features often have very ugly features that outweigh any sexual attraction to them. For example (and I usually always notice this), when I see a black woman who has a pretty face (more smooth, pleasant features), they usually have those ugly, shiny, spotty and or hairy-ish legs, or disgusting ape-like feet. That is very off-putting, to say the least.

Women are loyal to 1 thing only: their own womb.
And ever more steered by pop culture and anti-social media.

I would refrain from using online so-called ‘dating’ as a reference point to anything.
The same thing I said about it years ago is still true, perhaps more than ever:
Virtually all of the attractive profiles are either fake or 9 time zones away – or both, usually both – and the profiles that may actually be real & local are precisely the type of people who have always given personal ads a bad name.
They couldn’t get a date at gunpoint.

Problem is these white women will expect white men to support them and their brown babies. And, the govt will enforce it.

Giving the vote to women was a very big mistake. But, look, nothing lasts forever. Go with the flow. Western culture is committing suicide. Bail out. You don’t owe anybody anything. If you think spreading your DNA is important, that’s just your hormones controlling you. Go look at the fossils in the Natural History Museum and think. Living well is the only thing that’s important. Let society go to hell if it wants.

Why is this important? Because she’ll have 242 electoral votes just by recapturing all 19 of the usual Democratic states. Add Florida, a battleground state, and she’s reached 271. Boom, game over. Hello, Madame President.

I’m no fan of Hilary, but will take great schadenfraude in watching Drumpf’s incoherent, malignant, rage-filled, invective-laced political implosion.

I think we will see a LOT of very, very long journalist faces on election night, some of them in tears, and it might start early when Trump takes NY, NJ and PA.
It’s game over at that point and The Media mighty feel like collectively leaping from the 358th story of 1 Broadcast Plaza.
MA will, however, remain staunchly Dem, writing in Bernie’s name, crossing out Hillary’s.

“Yet no poll has ever shown that Americans want more open borders. Quite the reverse. By a huge majority—at least 60 percent—they want to rein in immigration, and they endorse an observation that Senator Alan Simpson made 20 years ago: Americans “are fed up with efforts to make them feel that [they] do not have that fundamental right of any people—to decide who will join them and help form the future country in which they and their posterity will live.” But if the elites’ and the advocates’ idea of giving voting rights to non-citizen majorities catches on—and don’t be surprised if it does—Americans could be faced with the ultimate absurdity of people outside the social compact making rules for those inside it.”

Reading the article right now. I had no idea our immigration situation was so insane. Illegal immigrants have been dictating our immigration policy to us for decades, thanks to Clinton. Unbelievable. These faggots screaming outside Trump rallies are just the latest in a long line of hateful, anti-white bigots trying to force themselves on us.

“A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995 that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong 18th Street Gang in southern California is illegal; police officers say the proportion is actually much greater. The bloody gang collaborates with the Mexican Mafia, the dominant force in California prisons, on complex drug-distribution schemes, extortion, and drive-by assassinations, and commits an assault or robbery every day in L.A. County. The gang has grown dramatically over the last two decades by recruiting recently arrived youngsters, most of them illegal, from Central America and Mexico.”

Pics of hot Black chicks are hard to come by, simply because…there aren’t very many of them.
Which is one of the biggest reasons why you hardly ever see a non-Black guy with a hot Black girl, be it in real life or in media-pretend-land.

Agreed, Wolfie. The last time that I was in an Old Navy was a year or so ago, and I could not find anything that I liked (even on the clearance racks) worth buying. Very low end, low quality goods made for the “Walmartian”-type shoppers. The ranking of affiliated companies, from bottom to top, is Old Navy —> The Gap —> Banana Republic. The prices and quality go up, as well.

The cucks complain about Trump’s anti-free trade message and decide that the reason why the message of Conservatism Inc. is losing is that because they haven’t been screaming about how great free trade and free markets are loudly enough:

Have any of these geniuses ever deigned to consider that it was the large hordes of Third World people being imported since the 1965 immigration act that was passed that are voting communist that is really the problem here?

Multi-lateral trade deals like NAFTA and TPP have long since outlived their usefulness, as they have become Rube Goldberg contraptions of cronyism and secret side deals for elite special pleaders. We need to return to the era of bilateral deals and “Most Favored Nation” status for those select countries where free trade is mutually beneficial. Historically, this has meant countries with equivalent standards of living, labor costs, and the rule of law.

An aside to CH: “feminization of culture and politics can be beneficial to the stability of a nation when it’s exploited during high T times to mitigate the worst excesses of rugged, expansionist, lassez faire, free-for-all masculinity.”

When, in your estimation was the last time this happened? The Christian amelioration of the warrior culture of Dark Age Europe comes to mind, but how about other examples?

Women very often are like leafs in the wind, blown from one place to another without knowing any direction, the just “enjoy the fly”. It is one reason why a strong man is a big advantage for a women, if she can overcome her ego and confess her natural needs.

Having grown up in her part of the world, I know women like Frau Merkel very, very well indeed.
Dried up, sour, stiff as a board intellectual harpies, reared on a combination of very thoroughly German post-war guilt complexes, post-Marxist ideology and the naturally occurring German sense of owning the world (which the aforementioned guilt complexes tell them is BAD).
IIRC, she was also Stasi-connected (Staatssicherheitsdienst, the East German version of the KGB), so she’s got quite a bit of sadistic torture chamber coursing through her brittle veins.
How they were fooled into voting someone like that into the chancellorship, I’ll never know.
No, wait, I do….
(sigh)

Interesting. This brings to mind her rather extreme reaction when President Bush put his hands on her shoulders from behind at some international conference. Kind of a douche move by W. but, damn, she really freaked.

I’ve explained my observation a number of times: look at the babies and little kids young white moms in Capitol Hill are toting around: white like her. Look at Walmart in Roanoke, Virginia. Guaranteed to see fat white mom with nappy headed kids. It’s paradoxical, as are many things in life, as whites in DC are some of the few in the nation who join blacks in voting Democrat (although at a 75% rate, not 95%). In Roanoke and other economically depressed and demoralized locales where the black college football players are their biggest source of inspiration, they vote solid Republican and will back Trump in the general election by huge margins. I don’t get. I wish it made more sense. I wish we had place that wasn’t stuck up, yet appreciated the finer things in life, appreciated the value of in-group mating, and was impervious to the charge of “racism”.

This actually is in line with my own observations. I was invited into a countercultural network by women (unsurprisingly, the more attractive women), and am accepted by the women — even the lesbians — but have little to nothing to do with the males. And I’m sure they know my political leanings. Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to find a group containing conservative girls that isn’t involved with some church I don’t want to join.

The results of this study are interesting in that they somewhat contradict tangential studies of the online dating market which have found that women, especially White women, prefer to date same-race men. In fact, White women, if those OKCupid data analyses are to be believed, are the most racist group of prospective daters.

Not really.

Whatever their attitude toward foreign men, hypergamy and masculinity drive white women into staying with white men for actual mating. Asian men might be able to compete on a hypergamy basis, but they usually can’t on a masculinity basis. Black, Muslim, and Hispanic men typically have the opposite problem. Hence white female race-mixing being considerably lower than what one would expect given the cultural and political circumstances.