If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I didn't make it a paragraph in before I recognized that turd for what it was. Seriously, keep preaching to your choir, because that insanely biased bullshit won't affect anyone's perspective. Did it echo what you want to hear?

I didn't make it a paragraph in before I recognized that turd for what it was. Seriously, keep preaching to your choir, because that insanely biased bullshit won't affect anyone's perspective. Did it echo what you want to hear?

Lol. I'm not surprised you couldn't make it through an entire paragraph.

I didn't make it a paragraph in before I recognized that turd for what it was. Seriously, keep preaching to your choir, because that insanely biased bullshit won't affect anyone's perspective. Did it echo what you want to hear?

I'm pretty sureness DD will not make it past the newspaper name before coming to his conclusion on this.

i have to wonder though, if coal appears to be on the way out because of the regulations that are being rolled back? Will removing the regulations enable a revival of coal? I'm sure the regulations added cost and requirements that made using coal less attractive for energy producers. Will this change that?

I'm pretty sureness DD will not make it past the newspaper name before coming to his conclusion on this.

i have to wonder though, if coal appears to be on the way out because of the regulations that are being rolled back? Will removing the regulations enable a revival of coal? I'm sure the regulations added cost and requirements that made using coal less attractive for energy producers. Will this change that?

Yeah, if it isn't in Breitbart DD wont make it past the masthead. I don't think the rollback matters much, because as every article points out, utilities are planning on a 50 year horizon. Nobody thinks this rollback will last past Trump, and nobody is going to make an investment decision based on something that may be so transitory, and contrary to what many states are requiring, or what is economically feasible.

i read the other day that the entire coal mining industry employs fewer people than Arby's.

Yeah, if it isn't in Breitbart DD wont make it past the masthead. I don't think the rollback matters much, because as every article points out, utilities are planning on a 50 year horizon. Nobody thinks this rollback will last past Trump, and nobody is going to make an investment decision based on something that may be so transitory, and contrary to what many states are requiring, or what is economically feasible.

i read the other day that the entire coal mining industry employs fewer people than Arby's.

Do you want to know what happens when a government commits to "green" and "renewable" energy?

I'm pretty sureness DD will not make it past the newspaper name before coming to his conclusion on this.

i have to wonder though, if coal appears to be on the way out because of the regulations that are being rolled back? Will removing the regulations enable a revival of coal? I'm sure the regulations added cost and requirements that made using coal less attractive for energy producers. Will this change that?

No. It is because more and more people are moving to solar and using net metering to reduce their bills. That means less money from utility companies. They need to evolve or die.

No. It is because more and more people are moving to solar and using net metering to reduce their bills. That means less money from utility companies. They need to evolve or die.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But renewable sources are more expensive to establish and maintain than legacy coal and gas plants. Rocky Mountain Power makes me pay more if I want the power I use to somehow magically come from only renewable resources. If power companies want to be profitable with shrinking margins due to independent sold use, it doesn't make sense for them to give up on cheaper, legacy sources unless regulations forces them to, or the government into subsidizes or incentivized renewable sources.

But renewable sources are more expensive to establish and maintain than legacy coal and gas plants. Rocky Mountain Power makes me pay more if I want the power I use to somehow magically come from only renewable resources. If power companies want to be profitable with shrinking margins due to independent sold use, it doesn't make sense for them to give up on cheaper, legacy sources unless regulations forces them to, or the government into subsidizes or incentivized renewable sources.

It is more expensive in the short term, but much cheaper in the long term. They are looking 50 years down the road here.