John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out there that dont need
>> tons of patches applied just to fulfill basic requirements for a MTA.
>
> No, there are not.
There are certainly many others that don't need patches to fulfill basic
requirements for an MTA, but whether they are better or not is
irrelevant for us, given Qmail's level of widespread adoption. There's
no discussion that there are still many people interested in having it
available.
After all, it's not like it's a 100 line C program with 10 totally
compatible alternatives... unfortunately! :-)
Cheers.
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]