Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

Search This Blog

Tired of US “aid” (exploitation), Africa and Global South look to China

How
much can Raytheon, Mastercard, Nokia, Monsanto and the like be
trusted to invest in long-term outcomes in the global South? When you
see the actors behind U.S. ‘aid and development’ in Africa, is it
any wonder that African leaders would look for any other partner to
work with?

by
Jim Carey

Part
4 - China will drive African prosperity and security

The U.S.
will attempt to create an idea that China is somehow “preying” on
African nations (as if the West would never!), but it seems genuinely
that this isn’t’ the case. What is really happening is that
Africa is choosing to work with China and this, in turn, means that
the U.S. stake in the continent is reduced and replaced by Chinese
interests.

Concerns
about the declining U.S. role in the continent are even surfacing in
the U.S. military, which feels China will throw off “anti-terror”
operations in Africa by stabilizing the continent and pushing U.S.
security interests out. The U.S. military has expressed concern about
this for years and now their fears seem to be playing out, as China
increases security cooperation with partner states and has even built
its first military base in Africa, just miles down the road from a
U.S. base in Djibouti.

However,
the big subversion of U.S. interests that is still forthcoming is the
upset victory of Chinese investment over U.S. capital. Not only is
China investing more money in Africa, Chinese projects and investment
have proven to be much more popular than U.S. involvement in African
countries.

In 2015,
Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a new era of “win-win”
development in Africa that would allow investors to “do good
while doing right,” and it now seems to not only be paying off
for the firms involved but also for the people of Africa. It should
come as no surprise that Africans are rejecting U.S. aid and
investment — which is often highly conditional or implemented with
violence, while China works as an honest broker respecting African
nations’ preservation of sovereignty and self-determination.

The U.S.
continues to combat this freedom of the African partners by labeling
it as “Chinese influence” and putting out “news” stories of
“Chinese interference,” such as the one behind China’s alleged
involvement in the recent coup in Zimbabwe that ousted President
Robert Mugabe. According to U.S. sources such as CNN, China was
guilty of facilitating the coup by Mugabe’s ousted Vice President
because they didn’t do anything to stop it.

How CNN
sees this as interference is unclear, but it demonstrates a general
feeling among the U.S. elite that China is somehow cheating and that
a major reason Africans prefer Chinese partnership to that of the
U.S. can’t simply be Beijing’s respect for their partners’
sovereignty and internal affairs. However, this seems to be the
reality. If the U.S. doesn’t figure that out soon, it is likely to
be left in the wake of progress emanating from Beijing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

globinfo
freexchange Why it
took so long for the Western mainstream media to 'discover' the war
in Yemen and the war crimes committed by the Saudi coalition in full
co-operation with the US? One
might think that the humanitarian disaster there - caused also by the
blockade of goods for the relief of the civilians - has become so
obvious, condemned multiple times by the UN, that the media finally
forced to speak about it. In
previous article
we attempted to explain the 'unexplained phenomenon' and the fact
that CNN surprisingly returned to the issue to openly condemn the US
support to the Saudi coalition atrocities against civilians in Yemen. Yet,
despite that the Saudi regimes have been, traditionally, the best
allies of the Western neocolonialists, this time, the US had serious
reasons to overthrow the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman
(MBS). And, surprisingly enough, at the center of this underground
conflict lies an attempt by the US to privatize Aramco, Saudi
Arab…

failed
evolution Nancy
Pelosi's speech after Democrats took the House in recent US elections
was not just a huge disappointment. Many progressives became furious
about her empty speech, which was full of the most obsolete political
generalities and cliches. But it
was not just that Pelosi didn't want to committ that Democrats will
fight for specific issues - in favor of the vast majority of
Americans - that returned in the political debate by Bernie Sanders
and the progressive movement. She
actually 'gave the finger' to the progressives straight and clear. If you
don't believe it, just check her own words: “... we will strive
for bipartisanship. [...] we have a bipartisan marketplace of ideas
that makes our democracy strong ...” Translation:
‘We will do business as usual. The bipartisan dictatorship will
remain strong and under the control of the plutocratic elite. Nothing
will change, don't bother.’ That's
all you need to know. Here is
another evidence that the c…

NSA
wants to take its battlefield targeting alert system that they used
to kill people in Iraq and in other war zones and implement it
globally, so that they can target anybody anywhere.globinfo
freexchangeSuzie
Dawson, asylum-seeking journalist and current
President of the Internet Party of New Zealand, is being targeted by
New Zealand intelligence agencies as a result of her activism in the
Occupy movement and against the TPP, among other causes. Dawson
spoke with Jimmy Dore and made some astonishing revelations coming
from Edward Snowden that were very little known. Here are the most
impressive: According
to the NSA, it takes a whole village for them to spy on the UN.
That's a direct quote they worked with the State Department and the
CIA to spy on and monitor and infiltrate the United Nations. The NSA
was literally planning a system of global control. They refer to it
in their documents as the global network and they want that spying
network to cover the entire globe. They actua…

globinfo
freexchange In late
August, we identified
an effort by Politico (rather sloppy), to present Joe Biden as the
most suitable leader for the Democratic party, based on the fact that
he could beat Donald Trump. The
sloppiness of the effort was proved by the way in which Biden was
promoted against Bernie Sanders, despite that the latest was beating
Trump with the same percentage, according to Politico's poll. It was
CNN that came now with another poll to contribute to this pro-Biden
operation and actually verify the title of our article back then.
That is, corporate Democrats will promote Joe Biden against Bernie
Sanders. Indeed, as usatoday
reports: Former
Vice President Joe Biden holds a wide lead over the other potential
candidates to challenge President Donald Trump in 2020, a CNN survey
found. About a third of respondents named Biden as their choice to
carry the Democratic banner in the next presidential election (33
percent), while Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders cam…

From
David Harvey's A
Brief History of NeoliberalismPart
3 - The corporate-backed institutions behind the rapid and artificial
ideological transformation of the American society in favor of
neoliberalism In the
US case I begin with a confidential memo sent by Lewis Powell to the
US Chamber of Commerce in August 1971. Powell, about to be elevated
to the Supreme Court by Richard Nixon, argued that criticism of and
opposition to the US free enterprise system had gone too far and that
‘the time had come –– indeed it is long overdue –– for
the wisdom, ingenuity and resources of American business to be
marshalled against those who would destroy it’. Powell argued
that individual action was insufficient. ‘Strength’, he
wrote, ‘lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and
implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of
years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort,
and in the political power available only through united action and
n…

globinfo
freexchange Greg
Wilpert of the RealNews, spoke with Brian Mier, editor for the website Brasil Wire,
about the recent developments after right-wing extremist Jair
Bolsonaro won the presidential election in Brazil. Mier
revealed astonishing details on how the neoliberal-fascist complex in
Brazil (fully backed by the US), undermined and destroyed the most
popular leaders of the Workers' Party (PT), Lula da Silva, Dilma
Rousseff and even Fernando Haddad, in order to bring Jair Bolsonaro
to power. The
purpose of this slow motion coup was what has been always for the US
empire, especially in Latin America: to secure and broaden the
absolute domination of the US and the Western corporate monopolies
and destroy any Leftist resistance against the neoliberal status quo. As Mier
explained: On the
eve of the Supreme Court decision - which ruled on whether Lula
should be imprisoned or not, exceptionally, in a moment when his
appeals were still going on, contrary to hundreds of other
poli…

globinfo
freexchange In a
recent interview at the Greek channel, Crete TV, the former Greek
Minister of Finance, Yanis Varoufakis, made some interesting
revelations. Among other things, he actually confirmed what the blog
thought until now to be an exaggerated far-right conspiracy theory.
He essentially confirmed that George Soros intervenes directly to
political leaderships, substituting political institutions in Europe
and elsewhere. Varoufakis
said that, on June, 2015, George Soros tried to contact Alexis
Tsipras via his own ‘channels’. In the interview, Varoufakis
claims that he had no idea what Soros wanted to talk about. As
Varoufakis also writes in his book Adults in the Room: My Battle
with Europe's Deep Establishment, for years he has been falsely
portrayed by the pro-troika establishment and the anti-Semitic Right
as Soros’s stooge in Greece. Yet,
Soros’s message to the Greek prime minister, Alexis Tsipras, came
as a perverse vindication. ‘Fire Varoufakis! Europe cannot
affo…

globinfo
freexchange I
got news for you. The entire Arab world is dysfunctional right now.
Completely dysfunctional. And I think it has the potential to be a
giant Yemen. A giant human disaster area. Guess
who said that, and most importantly, why he said it:

For a
moment we thought that a miracle was about to happen. We thought that
Thomas Friedman would become one of the few exceptions that would
declare regret for supporting the Iraq war, in a self-criticism short
'crisis'. You know, the war that was based on big lies and opened
Pandora's box for the Middle East chaos. But no. It was too good to
be true. As Ben
Norton of the Real
News
explains: For the
past two years, many leading pundits have been portraying Mohammed
bin Salman (MBS) as essentially the savior of the Middle East, if not of
the world. Thomas Friedman is probably the most egregious example.
But Thomas Friedman is a powerful New York Times columnist, a
so-called expert on the Middle East. And he, of c…

globinfo
freexchange Another
suspicious poll came out to promote various establishment options
against Bernie Sanders. As the Hill
reports: President
Trump trails Michelle Obama, Oprah and Sen. Kamala Harris
(D-Calif.) by double digits in potential 2020 presidential races,
according to a new poll. Trump
also trails several other female candidates in potential races,
although by slimmer margins, the Axios poll conducted by
SurveyMonkey found. The
poll shows Trump trailing by 13 points to Obama among registered
voters polled, by 12 points to Oprah and by 10 points to Harris.
He's also down by 9 point to Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) among
registered voters surveyed, by 6 points to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
(D-N.Y.) and by 5 points to his 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton. The
closest race would be between Trump and Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(D-Mass.), the poll found. Warren has a 2-point lead among
registered voters, according to the poll. The poll
includ…

From
David Harvey's A
Brief History of NeoliberalismPart
1 - Construction of political consent across a sufficiently large
spectrum of the population How was
neoliberalization accomplished, and by whom? The answer in countries
such as Chile and Argentina in the 1970s was as simple as it was
swift, brutal, and sure: a military coup backed by the traditional
upper classes (as well as by the US government), followed by the
fierce repression of all solidarities created within the labour and
urban social movements which had so threatened their power. But
the neoliberal revolution usually attributed to Thatcher and Reagan
after 1979 had to be accomplished by democratic means. For a shift of
this magnitude to occur required the prior construction of political
consent across a sufficiently large spectrum of the population to win
elections. What Gramsci calls ‘common sense’ (defined as ‘the
sense held in common’) typically grounds consent. Common
sense is constructed out of long-standing pr…