Comments on: Google The Publisherhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php
Thoughts on the intersection of search, media, technology, and more.Thu, 17 Nov 2016 05:16:00 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.1By: Winx Oyunuhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4414
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:59:58 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4414information such as number of transactions prices, both absolute quality so far on any channel nice projected.
]]>By: Douglas Lavinhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4413
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:57:05 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4413John, Journalists are taking a lot on the chin these days, but please don’t call Sharon Waxman, ex of the NYT and the WashPost “a woman who managed to get into a party” — if you are quoting from her, it would be nice if you googled her, she is quite well known. Love your site. Best, Doug Lavin
]]>By: caligulazhanghttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4412
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:14:52 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4412We provide include: North America (NAFTA), South American countries, the EU 27 countries, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Russia and other 248 countries and regions in a variety of Customs bill of lading data, import and export trade (Statistics) data. http://www.customs-data.com.cn
Competitive Intelligence Global Trade System (GT) data contains a large number of buyers and sellers information such as number of transactions prices, both absolute quality so far on any channel (for example, B2B, event, etc.) suppliers and buyers to study the information and products in the the positioning of the global market to provide authoritative and accurate data and reports!http://www.customs-data.com.cn/JOBOS-PR/
]]>By: geewhizhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4411
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:11:08 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4411Google stopped sticking to their guns a long time ago. Eric Schmidt really needs to stop the nonsense about not being a publisher because he loses credibility each time he says it. They own Knol. They own YouTube. They own Google Finance.

This argument is stupid. They are a publisher!

]]>By: JGhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4410
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:46:24 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4410Isn’t owning YouTube enough to classify Google as a publisher? Much of the content is available exclusively on YouTube. And because Google hosts and serves this original content, isn’t it a publisher already?

Google even commissions the content in a quid pro quo manner: It pays the content creators in the form of free bandwidth. While not a “traditional” commission, don’t tell me that isn’t a form of payment to the content creators. It is.

Why are we still waffling about this issue? Is it only because Google continues to deny what is already obvious? Don’t we know better by now?

]]>By: ajolie1http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4409
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:10:03 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4409In so many ways Google is the modern day MS: just sit back, see what works then embrace and extend. (It also has the cash cow like MS.) Google’s motto might be “Don’t Be Evil”, but when it comes to dominating the market the real motto is “Just Do It, Damn It; and #uck the motto”.
]]>By: Tim Raleighhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4408
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:51:41 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4408While I agree that the result of Google’s activities look like “publishing” it appears that they are not getting sucked into the same cost vortex that traditional publishing companies such as the NYTimes have. I think it would be more accurate to say that Google is creating a more personalized and sophisticated aggregator which I believe is the best way to leverage its competitive advantage (intellectual knowledge, technology, position) to increase market share. Eric Schmidt’s comments indicate (at least from my point of view) that they do not see themselves as a publisher, (commissioning content) at least in the traditional sense of the word. Ironically the more personalized the content the hard it is to manage (estimate and price) the inventory and to package to advertisers. It will be interesting to watch Google solve a problem that other “online media” companies have failed at.
]]>By: Chuckhttp://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4407
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:56:25 +0000http://battellemedia.com/archives/2009/04/google_the_publisher.php#comment-4407This is a great post John!

The link and article to thewrap.com was really interest. Was a surprise to see something like that on that site.