Juanita Broaddrick transcript NBC Dateline report conducted January 20, 1999, Bill Clinton rape allegation, American Thinker: Where is the Coverage of Juanita Broaddrick?, Hillary Clinton’s role in The Clintons’ War on Women

Juanita Broaddrick transcript NBC Dateline report conducted January 20, 1999, Bill Clinton rape allegation, American Thinker: Where is the Coverage of Juanita Broaddrick?, Hillary Clinton’s role in The Clintons’ War on Women

“the Democratic Party overlooked the ethical red flags and made a pact with Mr. Clinton that was the equivalent of a pact with the devil. And he delivered. With Mr. Clinton at the controls, the party won the White House twice. But in the process it lost its bearings and maybe even its soul.”…Bob Herbert, NY Times February 26, 2001

“I think that it was Hillary all the way. I think that she’s the mean-spirited one. She’s the ideologue, she’s the flaming left-wing socialist liberal. She’s a bad person with a criminal mind.”…Jerry Falwell

“My Next Leak Will Ensure Hillary’s Arrest”…Julian Assange

Most of you are aware of Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades before, during and after the presidency.

You are probably most familiar with the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal and Bill Clinton’s lying under oath which led to his impeachment.

You may not be as aware of Hillary Clinton’s decades old involvement in suppressing these stories, intimidating the women involved and lying about her support of rape victims.

I intend to inform you.

American Thinker, on August 1, 2015 posed an important question.

“Where is the Coverage of Juanita Broaddrick?”

“The liberal media feeding frenzy about a quarter-century-old alleged marital rape involving GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, and former wife Ivana, has a fury that was strangely absent when Bill Clinton was credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick in a Little Rock hotel room in 1978 when William Jefferson Clinton was attorney general of Arkansas.

Ivana says her alleged “rape” never happened, Juanita Broaddrick says hers did. So why aren’t Hillary and Bill being peppered with questions about it as Donald and Ivana are? Perhaps because unlike liberal nemesis Trump’s case, Clinton’s more credidble story is now considered “old news”.”

“Juanita Broaddrick’s story is a credible one, and one of the many “bimbo eruptions” that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton handled during her husband Bill’s presidential campaign As Linda Tripp, confidante of former Clinton intern Monica Lewinsky, told the Daily Mail how Hillary both enabled and covered up Bill’s many dalliances:

Tripp said: ‘His political success was largely dependent upon Hillary. He owed her a great deal. As is widely acknowledged, Hillary took care of all the ‘bimbo eruptions’ of which there were thousands in order to present to the world an electable candidate.

‘In this endeavor she was ruthless. She destroyed women so that their stories never saw the light of day.’

Juanita Broaddrick’s story was one that saw the light of day when in January 1999, a month after Bill Clinton’s impeachment in the House, she agreed to be interviewed by NBC’s Lisa Myers.”

The MSNBC transcript link has apparently been scrubbed. Therefore I have resurrected the transcript with the original NewsMax link to it.

From MSNBC and the NBC Dateline report conducted January 20, 1999.

“She became known as Jane Doe Number 5. Her story was well known to independent counsel Ken Starr, to House impeachment managers, to Washington insiders and Capitol Hill reporters. A month ago, she gave an interview to NBC News correspondent Lisa Myers. Since then NBC News has been carefully investigating this story — combing through state records, court documents and newspapers, cross-checking dates and events, talking to more than 80 people, and repeatedly requesting information from the White House.

LAST WEEK, as NBC News continued its investigation, Jane Doe Number 5 went public with her extraordinary allegation — that she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton 21 years ago. To some this is an old and unprovable accusation that should never have been circulated to begin with. To others it’s a story that must be told. Is she to be believed? Or is Jane Doe Number 5 the latest weapon in a relentless political war against Bill Clinton?

Juanita Broaddrick: “It’s important to me to tell what happened. I don’t know how people are going to take this. I don’t know what they’re going to think after all these years and months why I’ve come forward.”

Jane Doe Number 5 is 56-year-old Juanita Broaddrick, a successful businesswoman who has been the subject of intense political and media speculation. Rumors about Broaddrick’s story have been floating around Arkansas and Washington for years, known to both Clinton haters and supporters.

Broaddrick was pulled into the Paula Jones case, she met with investigators for the House Judiciary Committee and was interviewed by Ken Starr’s investigators. And though what she told Starr remains sealed it was seen by 40 members of Congress before the impeachment vote in the House. Later House Republican Whip Tom Delay publicly urged senators to find out what Jane Doe Number 5 had to say before deciding the fate of the president.

As the whispers about her grew, Broaddrick found herself hounded by the media — and she says she was the subject of gossip and half truths on the Internet and in the tabloids.

Juanita Broaddrick: “All these stories are floating around. Different stories of what really happened, of what people think happened and I was tired of everybody putting their own spin on it.”

The Broaddrick story became public last week, and since then her story has appeared in print, on radio and TV.

But much of what you may have read or heard is incomplete. While NBC News was investigating this story and seeking comment from the White House, our work became the subject of much speculation.

Tonight, you’ll see what we were able to learn and you’ll hear from Juanita Broaddrick herself — a woman who remained silent for two decades and who admits she has lied under oath about this story in the past but now says she wants to tell the truth.”

“Myers: “Had you, that morning, or any other time, given him any reason to believe you might be receptive?”

Broaddrick: “No. None. None whatsoever.”

Myers: “Then what happens?”

Broaddrick: “Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip (she cries). Just a minute… He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. (crying) And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen (crying) but he wouldn’t listen to me.”

Myers: “Did you resist, did you tell him to stop?”

Broaddrick: “Yes, I told him ‘Please don’t.’ He was such a different person at that moment, he was just a vicious awful person.”

Myers: “You said there was a point at which you stopped resisting?”

Broaddrick: “Yeah.”

Myers: “Why?”

Broaddrick: “It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to ‘Please stop.’ And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip.”

Broaddrick also says the waist of her skirt and her pantyhose were torn.

Juanita Broaddrick: “When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says ‘You better get some ice on that.’ And he turned and went out the door.”

Myers: “On your lip?”

Broaddrick: “Yeah.”

Broaddrick estimates Clinton was in her room less than 30 minutes.

Myers: “Is there any way at all that Bill Clinton could have thought that this was consensual?”

Broaddrick: “No. Not with what I told him, and with how I tried to push him away. It was not consensual.”

Since Hillary is running for the presidency, her role in the Broaddrick saga and other Slick Willy debauchery is extremely relevant.

More of that will be presented here in coming weeks.

From the book “The Clintons’ War on Women.”

“Hillary Clinton is running for president as an “advocate of women and girls,” but there is another shocking side to her story that has been carefully covered up—until now. This stunning exposé reveals for the first time how Bill and Hillary Clinton systematically abused women and others—sexually, physically, and psychologically—in their scramble for power and wealth.

In this groundbreaking book, New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone and researcher and alternative historian Robert Morrow map the arc of Bill and Hillary’s crimes and cover-ups. They reveal details about their actions in Arkansas, during Bill Clinton’s time in the White House, about who really ordered the deadly attack on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, during Hillary’s tenure as secretary of state, about their time at the Clinton Foundation, and during Hillary’s current campaign for president.

This is the first book to shed light on the couple’s deeply personal violations of the people they crushed in their obsessive quest for power. Along the way, Stone and Morrow reveal the family’s darkest secrets, including a Clinton family member’s drug rehab treatment that was never reported by the press, Hillary Clinton’s unusually close relationship with a top female aide, and a stunning revelation of such impact that it could strip Bill Clinton of his current popularity and derail Hillary’s push to be the second Clinton in the White House.

Anyone who cares about the future of the United States will want to read this tell-all, exposing the appalling, unvarnished, and ugly truth about the Clintons”

“It’s a horrifying true story of rape, intimidation, cover-up, drugs, greed and power.”

“The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.

Hillary Clinton’s core agenda is a quest for power, even while she presents herself as champion of women’s issues, Stone says.

“If Hillary intends to build her campaign around an appeal to women, her campaign is built on quicksand,” said Stone. But “Hillary is a life-time abuser of women and her advocacy on women issues rings hollow,” he said.”

12 responses to “Juanita Broaddrick transcript NBC Dateline report conducted January 20, 1999, Bill Clinton rape allegation, American Thinker: Where is the Coverage of Juanita Broaddrick?, Hillary Clinton’s role in The Clintons’ War on Women”

““She’s a life-long abuser of women. She denigrates, degrades and threatens those women who are unlucky enough to be the sexual assault victims of her husband, and that number, you know, is in the hundreds,” Stone said exclusively to Breitbart News.”

“I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don’t let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed, and we’re with you.”
HILLARY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

CW……….
………….in reality she should have kicked the Slick Willy really hard at least twice on his privates. It would have guaranteed that he would NEVER FORGET IT, and might well have left the other women alone for fear of getting kicked again. Her story re-enforces everything that most of us already know about the SOB. If she nailed him twice in a row it is more than probable that he would have needed emergency surgery to repair his balls…..(.but if there was a lot of physical damage he might have ended up CASTRATED), which might have saved the others from him. He does a real viscous attack on women, but I can’t help wonder what he would have done if he was confronted by a really pissed off husband who was Clinton’s size and weight. I have a gut feeling he would have RUN AWAY, most of his type are afraid to go one on one with their own gender. Such people are really just YELLOW SLIMY BASTARDS.

A friend of mine sent this to me today…thought I would share it with you !

From a Pastor – thoughts on Donald Trump

Is Trump good for America? I mentioned Sunday that I would speak on this next week. Unfortunately, I felt I was shoehorning this topic into my planned message. To properly present what I want to speak on Sunday, I may have to leave the Donald out of it! Let me take a minute for those that wonder and give some thoughts.

When I first heard that DT was entering the race last year, I told my wife that I felt that it was a good thing for the party and America. I knew that he was not a “saint,” but I knew that he would be like a bull in a china shop. He is a disruptor and I believe America could use a fresh thinker especially in the political arena. I didn’t think he would get the nomination, but felt it would shake up politics as usual. I was correct on the shaking up part. : )

Lance Wallnau likens him to a biblical Cyrus. Someone who is dynamically used of God even though not perceived by many as a God follower. God has used many people in history that I would probably not like or agree with. I’m not sure I would have liked the disciples, or David, or Moses. Somehow, God did not seem compelled to consult with me! : )

I have always liked Winston Churchill. He is seen as one of the greatest national leaders in the 20th century. Last year, I had the privilege of going through the War Museum in London. Winston is a key feature. His life is controversial. He was not always celebrated as a great leader. He was a bombastic, cigar smoking, at times crude, even misogynistic leader. It is alleged that he told off color stories to his children before bedtime!

A woman once told Churchill once that he was disgustingly drunk. His response was “My dear, you are disgustingly ugly, but tomorrow I shall be sober and you will still be ugly!”

There are many websites that discuss the outlandish comments and activities of this great world leader. He had exactly what was needed to stop Hitler at the Channel, to rouse a nation to never give up and to partner with America to find final victory in Europe. You wouldn’t want him as your pastor, maybe not even your father, but he was the right leader for that moment in England’s history. Such a brazen man that would go up to the roof of his quarters in central London and smoke cigars as Hitler’s air force bombed all around him. I’m not sure I would have voted for him….but he was the right man.

I think it would be awesome to have a righteous leader, that understood the intricacies of the economy, health care, defense, immigration, with great sensitivity to religious institutions, a heart for the poor, a vision for the future. If that leader was a praying person, formidable in the word of God and loved the local church, I would rejoice! I do not think that is the choice we will have in November.

Instead….we will look for someone who is imperfect, yet will fit the times we are living in. Particularly, that ‘whoever’ we vote for, it will be someone who might possibly have the opportunity to appoint up to three supreme court justices. That could shape our culture in America for the next 30 years…radically. The America of our grandchildren could be very different….and that may not be good. We cannot stay still. A non-vote is a passive vote for a direction we may regret.

So….is DT good for America? I honestly believe that he has been already. He has shaken the political system. Do his comments offend me? At times. Do I agree with all he says? Not at all. Is he a “Cyrus” that is being raised up by God to preserve America? Time will tell.

This I know. I will vote for the best chance for America. I will pray for our leaders as I have already. In the end….God will continue to be my source and my hope. I do believe that God has had a hand in America’s history. I hope He also will have a hand in its future.
——————————————————————————————-

oldsoldier80…….
………you presented the first realistic portrayal of Sir Winston Churchill that I have read in many years, and you do indeed have your facts correct, at least in compliance with what I learned about him decades ago. He was a rather BRASH person if you will.

OFF TOPIC BUT IMPORTANT…….
…………the US swimmers who demonstrated their stupidity in Rio are a very poor representation of the Olympian Spirit, and a equally poor representation of the US. I believe that they should be banned from ever again participating in the Olympic games.

Again…..OFF TOPIC BUT IMPORTANT……….
……..with respect to George Soros many people do not know that as a youth he was a NAZI COLLABORATOR. He [passed critical information to the Nazis where people were hiding. Yes he was only a child then but he was nonetheless a NAZI COLLABORATOR………..and it is more than probable that he was responsible for the murders of untold numbers of innocent people by the Nazis.

Oh yes … Churchill was very brash…but he got the job done….Patton was also very brash and he also got the job done….Doug-out Doug played Emperor, but he got the job done too.

As a student of serious history (that was one of my major studies in college/ the other was political science), I have noticed that regardless of the time period our country is in, someone always ‘rises to the occasion’….steps forward and takes the bull by the horns…..sometimes that bull gores them, sometimes the bull goes down……but the play is always made…it will be made in our time now.

We are in such a period of time in our history right this moment as I write. We are at the most serious “crossroads” we have ever faced, but that crossroads is not being portrayed to the public correctly…..it is being whitewashed by a ‘bought and paid for media’ that has sold their very public trust out after being given a status none other holds within our Constitution.

That of the ‘Fifth Estate’….the guardians of freedom of press and all other freedoms, to tell the truth and nothing but the truth…..that fifth estate has now become nothing but a governmental mouthpiece. that is non deserving of any protection under the Constitution….but they still have it, not from the people, but from the very government for who they work.

History never repeats itself…but it sure does seem like it does. There is always a “Man of the Hour” who is willing to put his life on the line because he sees the dangers facing our nation. Mr. Trump has become such a man.

I only hope and pray he lives long enough to put all these weasel bastards who have ‘barganed and sold’ this country out ….under the jail, or better yet before a firing squad.

Keep the Faith, old friend…..the final curtain hasn’t come down yet……and it ain’t over till the fat lady sings her swan song !!!