Excluding regulation of biofuel greenhouse emissions related to land-use changes, or of any greenhouse emissions from other agricultural activities

Allocating $5 billion to the Advanced Energy Project tax credit

Stabenow says her amendment is aimed at protecting small businesses. A written statement from Stabenow was quoted in the Kalamazoo Gazette:

"My amendment is a common-sense approach that allows protections from carbon pollution, determined by scientists and public health experts, to continue being developed while providing businesses the support and incentives they need as they reduce pollution, generate new clean energy technologies and create jobs."

The position Stabenow is taking pits her against her usual supporters - environmental groups.

David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council wrote on his blog that Stabenow's amendment, like an amendment from another Democratic Sentator (Jay Rockefeller - D-WV), would eventually lead to a repeal of the EPA's authority:

History shows that once enacted, delays are easily extended for many years. So like the Rockefeller amendment, the Stabenow amendment is a tactic for effectively repealing EPA’s authority to set carbon pollution safeguards for most industries.

Some Senators, like their colleagues in the House, are calling for an outright repeal of EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

Republican Senator Mitch McConnell from Kentucky has introduced an amendment that completely stops the EPA from using the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

It's not the first attempt to keep the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.