Physicists find clues to the origins of high-temperature superconductivity

Figure showing the conversion between incoherent and coherent electron correlations in the cuprates’ non-superconducting and superconducting states, respectively. Credit: Li et al. Published in Nature Communications.

Ever since cuprate (copper-containing) superconductors were first discovered in 1986, they have greatly puzzled researchers. Cuprate superconductors have critical superconducting temperatures—the point at which their electrical resistance drops to zero—of up to 138 K at ambient pressure, which far exceeds the critical temperatures of other superconductors and is even higher than what is thought possible based on theory.

Now in a new study, researchers have discovered the existence of a positive feedback loop that gratly enhances the superconductivity of cuprates and may shed light on the origins of high-temperature cuprate superconductivity—considered one of the most important open questions in physics.

The researchers, Haoxiang Li et al., at the University of Colorado at Boulder and the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, have published a paper on their experimental ARPES (Angle Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy) results on high-temperature cuprate superconductors in a recent issue of Nature Communications.

As the researchers explain, the positive feedback mechanism arises from the fact that the electrons in the non-superconducting cuprate state are correlated differently than in most other systems, including in conventional superconductors, which have strongly coherent electron correlations. In contrast, cuprates in their non-superconducting state have strongly incoherent "strange-metal" correlations, which are at least partly removed or weakened when the cuprates become superconducting.

Due to these incoherent electron correlations, it has been widely believed that the framework that describes conventional superconductivity—which is based on the notion of quasiparticles—cannot accurately describe cuprate superconductivity. In fact, some research has suggested that cuprate superconductors have such unusual electronic properties that even attempting to describe them with the notion of particles of any kind becomes useless.

This leads to the question of, what role, if any, do the strange-metal correlations play in high-temperature cuprate superconductivity?

The main result of the new paper is that these correlations don't simply disappear in the cuprate superconducting state, but instead get converted into coherent correlations that lead to an enhancement of the superconductive electron pairing. This process results in a positive feedback loop, in which the conversion of the incoherent strange-metal correlations into a coherent state increases the number of superconductive electron pairs, which in turn leads to more conversion, and so on.

The researchers found that, due to this positive feedback mechanism, the strength of the coherent electron correlations in the superconducting state is unprecedented, greatly exceeding what is possible for conventional superconductors. Such a strong electron interaction also opens up the possibility that cuprate superconductivity might occur due to a completely unconventional pairing mechanism—a purely electronic pairing mechanism that could arise solely due to quantum fluctuations.

"We experimentally discover that the incoherent electron correlations in the strange metal 'normal state' are converted to coherent correlations in the superconducting state that help strengthen the superconductivity, with an ensuing positive feedback loop," coauthor Dan Dessau at the University of Colorado at Boulder told Phys.org. "Such a strong positive feedback loop should strengthen most conventional pairing mechanisms but could also allow for a truly unconventional (purely electronic) pairing mechanism."

Surprisingly, the researchers also found that they could describe their experimental results using a semi-conventional quasiparticle-like approach, despite the fact that cuprate superconductors behave so differently than other materials.

In the future, the researchers plan to investigate whether this positive feedback mechanism can be integrated into other materials, perhaps leading to new kinds of high-temperature superconductors.

"We can look for similar positive feedback loops in related materials, and can also use the newly developed ARPES-based techniques to probe the details of the electronic correlations in even greater detail," Li said.

Related Stories

(Phys.org) -- Condensed-matter physicists the world over are in hot pursuit of a comprehensive understanding of high-temperature superconductivity, not just for its technological benefits but for the clues it holds to strongly ...

Superconductors are the holy grail of energy efficiency. These mind-boggling materials allow electric current to flow freely without resistance. But that generally only happens at temperatures within a few degrees of absolute ...

The debate over the mechanism that causes superconductivity in a class of materials called the pnictides has been settled by a research team from Japan and China. Superconductivity was discovered in the pnictides only recently, ...

Superconductors made of copper-oxide ceramics called cuprates are capable of conducting electricity without resistance at record-high temperatures—but still only at about one-third of room temperature. They also require ...

(Phys.org)—A team led by SLAC and Stanford scientists has made an important discovery toward understanding how a large group of complex copper oxide materials lose their electrical resistance at remarkably high temperatures.

Recommended for you

In microelectronic devices, the bandgap is a major factor determining the electrical conductivity of the underlying materials. Substances with large bandgaps are generally insulators that do not conduct electricity well, ...

Since the early 20th century, nearly all of Earth's glaciers have been retreating or melting. Glaciers cover 10 percent of the planet's land area and contain 75 percent of our fresh water. Moreover, the water from melting ...

Researchers in Eindhoven have developed a new type of low-energy, nanoscale laser that shines in all directions. The key to its omnidirectional light emission is the introduction of something that is usually highly undesirable ...

A pair of researchers, one with the Public University of Navarre, the other with the University of Bristol, has developed a system of holographic acoustic tweezers that can be used to manipulate multiple objects simultaneously ...

In order to evaluate a material's ability to withstand the high-radiation environment inside a nuclear reactor, researchers have traditionally used a method known as "cook and look," meaning the material is exposed to high ...

This article is fascinating. This is the first thing I have seen that could actually allow not only the discovery of entirely new superconductor families but eventual development of much better superconductors.

It is important to notice that improving current superconductors is not just about raising their critical point. It's also about reducing their susceptibility to magnetic flux, and making them more structurally robust, so they don't break when made into wires or magnets.

Puzzling, how can one figure this in terms of causality without a very close model; or more specifically, in order to enumerate close, model the flow desired and locate the atomic structure and state, or something very close. Sounds pretty simple, why not define a crystal, a metal, or molecule, such that one electron per atom or molecule or interface doesn't care where it is, i.e. very little potential required to move it in any direction throughout the solid. Are liquids on the table, how about gas, gas and metal, or gas, metal, and liquid? If we don't know what we are doing; then, what are you doing? Easter Egging it? Hot and cold, specific potential? ... In other words, this would be a state of specific matter, like Transparency, it's the same thing, but only the field centers, so .. where are the centers? v We can make anything transparent, it just depends on 1 plane, i.e. minimal.

Typically, rise in temperature is a rise in vibratory moments of the nucleus. I would not suspect electronic action until much "later", that would be shared ionization and di-ionization in an ordered manner throughout the matter. Can the nucleus be polarized, held to any plane, ... juz say'n.

Temperature is one "thang" but ... anyway, curiouser and curiouser. So the electron sharing is transparent, i.e seamless, therefore a defined flow. Hmmmm

Johann F. Prins has realized this model when he observed diamond samples, which were subject of doping by oxygen ion implantation (for getting low temperature discharge cathodes for LED displays). Some electrons were attracted to surface of diamond by oxygen holes beneath it and they formed a superconductive phase there - at free air and at room temperature. But he wasn't aware, that similar mechanism http://www.superc...ltra.htm there.

@Hyperfuzzy: the attraction of electrons to an insulator surface eliminates their motion in direction perpendicular to it. I think, that if we would choose a sufficiently robust insulator, we could create a https://i.imgur.com/1N9dv5s.gif etc...

Think, when your feet in shoes and socks rub against the carpet and you touch an un-grounded metal doorknob; how do you draw and arc, i.e. 3 x 10^6 V/m * 1*10^-3 M, to enable a 1 milli-meter arc, or more. So why do you say there is no perpendicular motion? What if you only need the field?