DanRules - have you been keeping an eye on the filters? Are the large amount of plays due to using a 3 game threshold instead of 4 - just wondering why so many plays this year - and along with that way more C game losses

DanRules - have you been keeping an eye on the filters? Are the large amount of plays due to using a 3 game threshold instead of 4 - just wondering why so many plays this year - and along with that way more C game losses

There have only been 4 plays that had the 3 game spread, all in early May. We suffered a loss on the Bos/Tex series that started 5/3. Bos was a V69. We won on the A game in the other 3 series - 5/3 on KC at home vs ChiSox, 5/6 on AZ at LAD and 5/9 on AZ at home vs Philly.

I'm thinking about ditching ATL and doubling up on STL. After a loss they are 77.8% likely to win and they are 62.8% likely to win at home every time. I would chase them 4 easily.

Atlanta barely qualifies as it is. I'm going to wait to see if their entire OF is still injured or not. The Sox qualify as one of the temas I'm betting against post ASB so I'll be playing that regardless, but maybe less than my normal amount. We'll see.

Dan - do you happen to have this years YTD or +/- units record? cuz I've been changing my units and don't have the full stats butt I know I'm up for a few units - just curious what's the official record...

Dan - do you happen to have this years YTD or +/- units record? cuz I've been changing my units and don't have the full stats butt I know I'm up for a few units - just curious what's the official record...

I've done the same thing. If you bet each series to win 1 unit and bet less than 1 unit when a team was an underdog (x to win 1 unit) the losses would be 40.41 units, so overall you'd be up 30.59 units based on 71 wins.

There will be some variances based on what lines you get compared to mine, rounding or if you bet 1 unit to win more than 1 on the underdogs. The Boston series was all underdogs so instead of losing 7 on that, I lost a little under 5.

I'm very happy that we are still at a decent gain even with 4 losses. I'm not liking that 16% have gone to a C game.

I have created a Google doc spreadsheet for the RPI MLB system. I've added the 2013 plays to date. I've also started to add the 2012 plays. Start of the 2012 year up to the all star break. I think the spreadsheet should be publicly visible. I'll add more 2012 plays and maybe get back to 2011.

1. In 2012 the forum started on April 30. They lost 2 series right from the start. So they said, let's start over with the first series of May. I think this is fraudulent. If you publish an "official" play, then it needs to count. No mulligans. I've included the now officially deleted plays from 2012. Also, the forum from 2012 is a pain to follow. Far too much bickering about things other than the RPI system. It was difficult to sort out. Also, they made at least one error, which I have corrected. IMHO, the 2013 forum is much easier to following. Thx.

2. For me there is one key measure above all else to a system's success: ROI. 2012 up to all star break is 6.24% 2013 is 10.46%. I usually consider 10% the cut off point for blindly following a system. Anything under 10% is too risky to follow without additional handicapping. Right now 2013 RPI is right at that 10% cut off point. I have followed the RPI system in prior years and I think 2012 was a bad year. Years prior to 2012 did much better.

3. Big difference between 2012 and 2013 plays. A lot more in 2013 that in 2012. 2012 first half had 79 games (45 series), 2013 had 114 (75 series).

I have created a Google doc spreadsheet for the RPI MLB system. I've added the 2013 plays to date. I've also started to add the 2012 plays. Start of the 2012 year up to the all star break. I think the spreadsheet should be publicly visible. I'll add more 2012 plays and maybe get back to 2011.

1. In 2012 the forum started on April 30. They lost 2 series right from the start. So they said, let's start over with the first series of May. I think this is fraudulent. If you publish an "official" play, then it needs to count. No mulligans. I've included the now officially deleted plays from 2012. Also, the forum from 2012 is a pain to follow. Far too much bickering about things other than the RPI system. It was difficult to sort out. Also, they made at least one error, which I have corrected. IMHO, the 2013 forum is much easier to following. Thx.

2. For me there is one key measure above all else to a system's success: ROI. 2012 up to all star break is 6.24% 2013 is 10.46%. I usually consider 10% the cut off point for blindly following a system. Anything under 10% is too risky to follow without additional handicapping. Right now 2013 RPI is right at that 10% cut off point. I have followed the RPI system in prior years and I think 2012 was a bad year. Years prior to 2012 did much better.

3. Big difference between 2012 and 2013 plays. A lot more in 2013 that in 2012. 2012 first half had 79 games (45 series), 2013 had 114 (75 series).

4.

game 1 2012 WL=18-27 2013 WL=48-27

game 2 2012 WL=20-7 2013 WL=15-12

game 3 2012 WL=4-3 2013 WL=8-4

In 2012 game 2 was a huge success. In 2013 it looks like game 1.

5. 2012 road vs home plays, 16v 26h.

2013 road vs home plays, 28v 37h.

4 games series with extended plays 2012 VH=2-1 2013 VH=5-5.

6. 2012 avg play -141, 2013 avg play -150.

Wow, that is some fine work my man. Thanks for posting this. I will check out the spreadsheet tomorrow when all the rum from the Red Rock is out of my system.

18+ and BeGambleAware. Activities offered by advertising links to other sites may be deemed an illegal activity in certain jurisdictions. Viewers are specifically warned that they should inquire into the legality of participating in any games and/or activities offered by such other sites. The owner of this website assumes no responsibility for the actions by and makes no representation or endorsement of any of these games and/or activities offered by the advertiser. As a condition of viewing this website viewers agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from the viewer’s participation in any of the games and/or activities offered by the advertiser.