Right!!! In Poland par example there are some "anty racist" jewish organisations branding "Racist" or "Nazi" everybody who dares to say a word
against Gaza massacre. They prepare some black lists...for new Zionist concentration camps maybe...
And by the way Askenazy Jews are not Semitic race...and the Palestinians and most of "terror supporting Islamists" are

This thread was just moved into this forum, at my request, where I hope it will receive some attention.

The suggestion here is that many words, not just anti-Semitism, are part of the reason some differences seem irreconcilable.

Another abused word, in my opinion, is “settlements.” Why not call these what they are, colonies? Colonization is supposed to be against
international law but seems fine by America as long as Israel calls their colonies, settlements.

Please add any misused words you can think of in the Mid-East debate, and/or comment on the abused words I have raised for discussion. Thanks.

I too agree that this incorrect term needs to stop being used. "Anti-Jewish" makes a LOT more sense.

if you read a bit further you will see:

However, the Canaanites and Amorites also spoke a language belonging to this family, and are therefore also termed Semitic in linguistics,
despite being described in Genesis as sons of Ham (See Sons of Noah).

The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern people originating in southwestern Asia, including Akkadians, Canaanites,
Phoenicians, Hebrews, Arabs, and Ethiopian Semites.

Oh dear! Even Wiki is distorting facts to attend to the needs of zionism.

There is no such thing as an Ethiopian Semite. Ethiopians are predominately Hamites including the Falasha Jews transported to Israel in the 1990s as a
publicity stunt. What the first thing the Israelis did? They conducted conversions because they did not even recognise their Jewishness.

In 1985, Rabbi David Bleich published a rather mean-spirited responsum in which he argues that the Falashas are not to be considered Jewish, and must
undergo conversion after an appropriate period of instruction.

Furthermore, the Wiki definitions refers to tribal designations of an ancient period of history that no longer exists. It is like me refering to the
French as Gauls, the Scots as Picts and the Italians as Lumbards.

These kinds of convoluted and redundant terminologies only serves to propagate zionist mythology and deliberately clouds reality and the the
inconvenient presence of Semitic Palestinians.

Are these gentle looking folk more Semite than the Palestinians? The fact is that all the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews are the
ancestors of the Palestinians and a large portion of the Arabs. The Palestinians are the descendants of these ancients.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.