Thousands Of Missouri Inmates Whose Paroles Were Revoked May Be Entitled To Relief, Judge Rules

Many parolees have been sent back to prison for technical violations of their parole, without benefit of due process.

Big Stock

Originally published on March 1, 2019 3:53 pm

Missouri will have to reform its parole policies after a federal judge ruled in favor of thousands of current and former parolees who sued the state, claiming those policies are unconstitutional.

Many parolees have been sent back to prison for technical violations of their parole such as crossing a state line, missing a parole appointment or losing a job because their employer found out about their criminal record.

The state has “created a procedural vortex from which people on parole cannot escape and are at continual risk of being rearrested and reentered into the prison system,” the lawsuit stated.

In an uncommonly succinct seven-sentence order Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Bough in Kansas City sided with the plaintiffs and granted them summary judgment.

The order is “extremely significant,” said Megan G. Crane, an attorney with the MacArthur Justice Center in St. Louis, which filed the lawsuit in August 2017. “It is a recognition by the federal court that the Missouri Department of Corrections and Board of Parole is in clear violation of the Constitution for the procedures and policies they use for the parole revocation process.”

The suit alleges that the Missouri Department of Corrections and its Division of Probation and Parole have blatantly disregarded U.S. Supreme Court decisions establishing procedures to protect parolees’ due process rights.

The corrections department did not return a call seeking comment. The Missouri Attorney General’s office, which defended the suit, did not offer a response to Bough’s ruling.

Missouri pressures inmates to waive hearings, often doesn’t provide them with lawyers they’re entitled to and presents them with a blizzard of paperwork so confusing they sometimes don’t know what violations they’re accused of committing, according to The Marshall Project, a nonprofit news organization that focuses on criminal justice issues.

In court filings, Missouri conceded that it has failed to provide parolees with minimal due process safeguards. Crane said that because the state conceded liability, “the court wasn’t required to say much more, given that the violations were so blatant and so pervasive.”

She said Missouri acknowledged that even when parolees are deemed to be mentally ill or incompetent, the state does not provide them with legal counsel.

The practical effect of Bough’s ruling will be to require Missouri to fashion a remedy to cure its constitutional violations. What precisely that will be remains undetermined.

“That is a question that's yet to be answered," Crane said. “It is on the state to fully remedy their many constitutional violations. We look forward to a remedial plan from the state that provides counsel and due process protections to which parolees are indisputably entitled very soon.”

Amy Breihan, another attorney with the MacArthur Justice Center, said in an email that Missouri has been operating “an unconstitutional parole revocation system for some time now, resulting in the unjust reincarceration of thousands of people.”

“Now that we have a judgment in hand we hope to promptly move forward with implementing changes to ensure not another parolee is returned to a Missouri prison without being guaranteed their rights to due process,” she said.

Breihan told KCUR in January that about 6,600 Missouri parolees went through the revocation process in 2017. At least 90 percent had their parole revoked and were sent back to prison.

“A lot of these individuals who are being sent back to prison without due process have mental health issues. They have addiction issues and those are not being addressed,” Breihan said.

“They're just being re-incarcerated and their lives and their communities are continually disrupted. It’s not a central focus of the case, but I think it's important to think about why these folks are being sent back to prison and how it is impacting their lives and their ability get back on steady ground.”

Parole revocations are handled by the state parole board. Missouri is one of 14 states in which meetings and records are closed to the public, according to The Marshall Project.

The Marshall Project said that in 2016, the Missouri corrections department’s inspector general reported that a member of the parole board and a staffer had made a game of parole board hearings. They would choose a “word of the day” like “hootenanny” or “armadillo” and earn points by making unsuspecting inmates repeat it.

Dan Margolies is a senior reporter and editor at KCUR. You can reach him on Twitter @DanMargolies.

Related Content

The first time Michael Milton helped buy somebody’s freedom, he didn’t expect it would be so simple.

He filed some paperwork, handed over cash and waited. Several hours later, the 19-year-old for whom Milton posted bail walked out of the St. Louis City Justice Center. The teenager had spent three months behind bars because he didn’t have $750 to make bail.

Once a month, Jocelyn Garner steps off a bus and walks into a dimly lit waiting room in the Dutchtown neighborhood of St. Louis. Her name is called, and an office worker jots down her personal information and asks if she’s staying out of trouble.

The visits take less than five minutes and cost her $30. Her payments go to Eastern Missouri Alternative Sentencing Services, a private company based in St. Charles that tracks and monitors people awaiting trial in St. Louis. She’s made these trips since September.