Accelerate Assad’s Departure

Demonstrators protesting against Syrian president Bashar al-Assad march through the streets after Friday prayers in Amude on November 11. A poster depicting President Assad dumped in a litter bin reads "Keep it clean," (Courtesy Reuters).

Today’s conventional wisdom in Washington is that Bashar al-Assad’s departure is “inevitable.” Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs Jeffrey Feltman used that phrase when testifying last week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. To be sure, the Arab League’s vote to suspend Syria clearly isolates Damascus regionally, and that should not be discounted. But it is not going to lead Bashar al-Assad to step down immediately. To the contrary, expect even greater regime brutality in the period ahead.

Still, there are a number of steps the United States and the international community can take to raise the probability of Assad’s departure from Syria. On the diplomatic front, a contact or “friends of Syria” group should be established to help bring together the now anti-Assad Arab League with other concerned countries, including Turkey, Europe, and the United States.

Moreover, the international community should not be deterred by Russia and China’s October 4 veto of a Security Council resolution that would have lambasted Syria for its human rights record. China has since demonstrated greater receptiveness to criticizing Syria, though Russia remains solidly behind Damascus. But would Moscow veto an arms embargo on Syria? Such a move would be an embarrassment for Russia in the international community.

And then there is the International Criminal Court. Indicting top members of the regime, with threats of more indictments to come, could help to “incentivize” other members of the security services to break from Assad, lest they too fall prey to international jurisdiction.

The international community should do more to encourage the Syrian National Council (SNC) which is, unfortunately, divided and disorganized. That is not surprising, given its relative youth—it only recently formed—and Syrian government efforts to divide them. But left to its own devices, the SNC will not be able to reach out to the significant minority groups that remain fearful that a post-Assad Syria will offer no protections for them. As much as many within the Christian, Alawite, Druze, and Armenian communities may dislike Bashar, many of them remain fearful of the day after. The SNC must do more to assure those communities that there is a future for them in Syria after Bashar.

On the economic front, broad-based sanctions are clearly having an effect on the Syrian economy. It is not clear who they are hurting the most, however. Do broad sanctions increase the dependency of ordinary citizens on the regime, as was the case in Saddam’s Iraq? Or will they lead—eventually—to so much malaise that people will take to the streets? A more effective tool seems to be the designation of individuals who are most critical to supporting the regime economically. Already some seventeen individuals and eighteen entities have had sanctions levied against them. There should be more, so as to encourage fence-sitting supporters to break from the regime.

Finally, Western officials should not proclaim that all NATO considerations of Syria are off the table. NATO chief Anders Rasmussen told reporters recently that NATO “has no intention (to intervene) whatsoever. I can completely rule that out.” U.S. ambassador to NATO, Ivo Daalder, reiterated this before the Atlantic Council last week, saying that NATO has had “no planning, no discussion, and no thought” of action in Syria. This all may be true. But broadcasting it only provides unnecessary comfort to Bashar al-Assad. Ambiguity is a key tool in international politics. Instead of bold proclamations against the use of military force, hinting at possible sanctuaries and no fly zones could be helpful, especially should the Arab League call for it. And if no military action is indeed possible, then best to say nothing.

Removing Bashar al-Assad from power will not be easy. He still commands a strong and loyal army, and enjoys support from the business elite in Syria’s two largest cities, Damascus and Aleppo. So far, these cities have remained largely outside the unrest and killings sweeping large swathes of Syria. Finally, he retains the support of many in Syria, especially among its heterogeneous minorities who fear the day after his departure. Prying away these various pillars of his support will not be easy. But the Arab League’s move toward suspending Syria just provided a large regional boost toward Bashar’s hoped-for downfall.

what the poster said ; even Assad`s photo is too dirty to be thrown into the dump, so keep the dump clean.

Posted by evelyn leopoldNovember 18, 2011 at 2:56 pm

Just fyi, Syria is not a state party to the ICC so Assad can’t be tried there UNLESS the Security Council adopts a Chapter 7 resolution to that end. Ironic, isn’t it. EL

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

Name *Email (will not be published) *Website

* RequiredComment *

About This Blog

Middle East Matters explores the intersection of U.S. foreign policy and Middle East developments with special focus on Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, and Palestine.

New Independent Task Force Reports

India now matters to U.S. interests in virtually every dimension. This Independent Task Force report assesses the current situation in India and the U.S.-India relationship, and suggests a new model for partnership with a rising India.

Rates of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries are increasing faster than in wealthier countries. The report outlines a plan for collective action on this growing epidemic.

The authors argue that the United States has responded inadequately to the rise of Chinese power and recommend placing less strategic emphasis on the goal of integrating China into the international system and more on balancing China's rise.

Campbell evaluates the implications of the Boko Haram insurgency and recommends that the United States support Nigerian efforts to address the drivers of Boko Haram, such as poverty and corruption, and to foster stronger ties with Nigerian civil society.