The more we learn about Reichskanzlerin May, the more we’re convinced that she’s Angela “Luder” Merkel in drag.

Recently, she announced, while kissing the arses of the genocidal regime in Zimbabwe II, er, South Africa, that she was absolutely fine with seizing farmland from whites “as long as it’s done in a legal way.”

We know that the plight of the remaining whites in South Africa isn’t terribly interesting in this country, after all you can’t be racist against whites, right?, but it’s not exactly a new thing. As soon as Nelson “Flaming Necklace” Mandela and his terrorist goons got to power, rape, murder and theft committed against whites became the order of the day. Those of us who do pay attention to things going on in the far abroad know this. Stories of white children raped and murdered while their families were forced to watch before being murdered themselves weren’t exactly uncommon.

So the announcement of the new South African Junta that they were going to change the constitution of South Africa to allow for taking away land from white farmers, specifically white farmers, without compensation which, in civilized nations (but we’re talking about Africa here, so never mind) is called “theft”, was really no surprise to us.

Sadly, neither was Frau Führerin May’s full-throated support of it.

In a statement on Tuesday, Mrs May said: “The UK has for some time now supported land reform. Land reform that is legal, that is transparent, that is generated through a democratic process. It’s an issue that I raised and discussed with President Ramaphosa when he was in London earlier this year. I’ll be talking about it with him later today.”

When one side holds all the votes, then anything they want to do can be made “legal”, can’t it? After all, they’re the ones writing or changing the laws to fit their purpose, aren’t they?

Like, say, the Nuremberg Laws forbidding Jews to marry Germans, own businesses and only G-d knows how many other things. Hey, they were passed through the “democratic” process post-Nazi takeover of the German government, weren’t they? Perfectly legal. Even the wholesale genocide of Jews after the Wannsee conference was, according to German law at the time, perfectly “legal.”

So we can only assume, based on SS-Luder May’s own statement, that she really doesn’t have a big problem with the Holocaust. It was legal, after all, under German laws enacted by a democratically elected German government and yes, Virginia, the NSDAP DID come to power through entirely legal and democratic means. And then they changed the laws so that they never could lose that power again.

Yet no sane person would ever, EVER suggest that the fact that everything they did after that was perfectly legal under German law made it even remotely RIGHT.

Or else the Nuremberg trials would have basically been a scam. After all, under May’s standard, you can’t really prosecute people for having done something that was legal when they did it, can you?