We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By closing this message, you
are consenting to our use of cookies.

Pupils in UK special schools “treated differently” again, following the removal of standardized assessments

24th February 2020

No national progress routes for children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities study shows

Following the recent withdrawal of standardized assessments, children with intellectual disabilities at special schools in the UK are again being treated differently to children at mainstream schools, says a new study from researchers at The Open University.

Published in Disability & Society, the peer-reviewed research shows there is currently no national progress levels for children with severe or profound intellectual disabilities – meaning teachers have no standardized way of tracking the development of students in both academic and non-academic learning areas.

As in many countries, the intellectual and academic progress of pupils at UK schools is assessed using standardized, nationwide tests given at specific ages (for primary school pupils in the UK, these tests are given at age seven and 11). But these tests are not suitable for pupils with severe intellectual disabilities being taught in special schools, as these pupils will be operating far below the levels being tested.

Because pupils with severe intellectual disabilities should still make progress over time, their progress needs to be assessed just like pupils in mainstream schools, both to determine what kind of continuing support they need and to show at what level a pupil is working if they change schools. Until recently, the progress of children with severe intellectual disabilities was determined via standardized assessments known as Pre-National Curriculum Performance Levels, or P-levels, which were specially designed for pupils working below the level of the standard tests and assessments.

In 2016, however, a review of P-levels concluded they were no longer fit for purpose, because they were too restricted and limited to assess the complex difficulties associated with many children in special schools. This caused the UK government to discontinue P-levels for all but pupils with the most profound intellectual disabilities and instead ask special schools to develop their own assessment programmes.

According to lead researcher Elizabeth Smith, although this move did allow schools to tailor their assessments to the specific needs and abilities of their pupils, it has also created lots of problems and placed extra burdens on the schools. She and her colleagues argue that these downsides have not been properly considered.

“While some teachers welcome the chance to re-organise or design a new curriculum and associated assessments, many teachers are left perplexed and exasperated by the fact that they have no statutory guidelines or framework to work with and are expected to create their own,” says Smith.

“And if schools are creating their own assessments, how can they ensure these systems are not just viewpoints or opinions but are valid assessment frameworks grounded in theory? With each school creating their own assessments, it will also be difficult for them to know at what level a pupil joining from a different school is working at.”

Smith and her colleagues further argue that the abandonment of P-levels shows that special schools and their pupils are still viewed and treated very differently. “This would never happen in mainstream schools, so why are special schoolteachers being left to cope with all this extra work without the time and resources to do so?” she says. “Despite governments’ policies promoting equality amongst all children and the need for inclusion of all, children in special schools are again being treated as ‘other’.”

Books contacts

A 425-million-year-old millipede fossil found in Scotland is the world's oldest known fossil of an insect or arachnid. Researchers have published their exciting new findings in Historical Biology [Read more...]

3

1

3 days ago

We are excited to announce have integrated into their #manuscriptsubmission processes with . More here: [Read more...]

0

0

5 days ago

Does #pregnancy affect #memory? This article, in the news, compared control participants with those in their third trimester of pregnancy to find out... #Neuropsychology [Read more...]

1

2

9 days ago

What can modern scientists, looking for a #COVID19 vaccine, learn from Edward Jenner? This article looks at the history of smallpox
and vaccination
[Read more...]

0

1

9 days ago

How will #sports be after #COVID19? This article examines role of the media and how it affects sports #socialmedia #golf [Read more...]

2

0

10 days ago

A recent study of people in Singapore who had contracted SARS in the early aughts found they retain “significant levels of neutralizing antibodies” for nine to 17 years after initial infection [Read more...]

0

0

11 days ago

This study found that shields worn by a test subject within 1.8 metres of a cough reduced inhaled influenza virus by 92%, although this protective effect reduced after the cough had dispersed for 30 minutes [Read more...]

2

0

17 days ago

This new research shows that people believe they're less likely than others are to fall for online scams. The cybersecurity study has significant implications as we increasingly work remotely during #COVID19 pandemic [Read more...]

0

1

17 days ago

The number of Asian Hornets, Vespa mandarinia, is on the rise in North America. This study shows just how potentially lethal they are with 30 to 50 people dying each year in Japan alone [Read more...]

0

0

18 days ago

Looking at 315,000 children, this new study out today suggests that childhood obesity raises bladder cancer risk. The findings could help scientists improve their understanding of what triggers bladder cancer [Read more...]