About this Blog

This blog provides a forum for discussion of therapeutic technique, including cognitive behavioural and psychodynamic technique. The focus of the blog is on psychotherapeutic technique and issues in the room rather than case or theoretical discussions.
At the bottom of each post is a comments section. Feel free to make any comments you like.
Please remember this blog is a public forum.

Your Host

Chris Allan is a clinical psychologist and Director of the Psychology Clinic at the University of Wollongong. He has a strong interest in both cognitive and psychodynamic therapies and an ongoing fascination in the interaction of technology and psychology. His interests are varied and include martial arts, playing guitar, cooking, chess, clothes, poetry and computer gaming. He is married with two children two dogs and a budgie.

Email Update

Contact

Site Meter

This Site

Easy and Cheesy: Simple Techniques from the Happiness Research

I like the happiness stuff, how can you not. It is simple, positive and easy to apply. Sometimes I like a break from all the deep stuff that demands so much more from me both as a person and a therapist. It has certainly seen rapid growth both in research and commercial exploitation.

I must admit I find some of the research confusing. I remember reading a New Scientist article (can’t find the link now) on happiness indicating that most of your happiness is genetically determined, around about a whopping fifty percent. The next biggest contributor off the block at two per cent (yes only two per cent) was marriage. This is actual marriage (ring on the finger stuff) not just living together.

At the same time there is some compelling research on the use of very simple techniques that appear to make significant differences to both people’s levels of depression and their perceived levels of happiness. This research challenges those therapeutic ideas that the harder and deeper the work the longer lasting and more real the change. Marty Seligman and others published a good review, in the American Psychologist, on the current state of happiness research with a focus on demonstrating the utility of some very specific and simple techniques. They identify two techniques as being particularly effective over the long term (six months).

Three good things in life: Participants were asked to write down three things that went well each day and their causes every night for one week. In addition, they were asked to provide a causal explanation for each good thing.

Using signature strengths in a new way: Participants were asked to take our inventory of character strengths online at Authentic Happiness and to receive individualized feedback about their top five signature strengths. They were then asked to use one of these top strengths in a new and different way every day for one week.

This signature strength exercise has similarities with some of the values based exercise from the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as well as some of the behavioural activation techniques.

The outcomes for these techniques are graphed below. Remember participants only did the exercise for one week.

We found specific interventions that make people lastingly happier, and we believe this study holds implications for the future of positive interventions and perhaps for clinical interventions. We operationalized and compared five happiness interventions to a placebo control in a sizable random-assignment experiment, and found that two interventions—writing about three good things that happened each day and why they happened, and using signature strengths of character in a new way made people happier (and less depressed) up to six months later....

The paper goes to acknowledge the limitations of the research (well educated, white, mildly depressed sample) but adds a plea for these techniques to be considered as adjunct to normal therapy.

We cannot resist the speculation that happiness exercises may prove therapeutic in depressive disorders. It is important to note that these interventions also reduced depressive symptoms lastingly, and in other studies we are finding that this effect is massive. Typically in the therapeutic endeavor, we tackle disorders head-on: We teach anxious people to relax, depressed people to argue against depressing thoughts, people with conflict to gain insight into the sources of conflict, and people with obsessive–compulsive disorders to find out that disasters do not ensue if they do not perform their rituals. In fact, an unspoken premise of all talk therapy is that it is beneficial to talk about one’s troubles and to overcome them by confronting them. We see positive interventions as a supplement to therapy focused on troubles, another arrow in the quiver of the therapist. Psychotherapy as defined now is where you go to talk about your troubles and your weaknesses; perhaps in the future it will also be where you go to build your strengths.

I read a book called "Feeling Good" from a clinical psychiatrist at the Philadelphia School of Medicine. He also had a website once.

I was hospitalised with depression and followed his (or rather his associates) cognitive techniques - identifying negative thinking, tracking your illness and doing something positive about it.

I found his recommendation of "rating" your daily activities on a scale of 1-5 on how well you felt before, and crucially, *after* you performed chores, reading, radio listening, etc. to be highly effective. That's because nearly 8 times out of 10 you feel much better about doing things afterward. The act of writing things down was tedious at first, but has amazing effects on mood over time.

My psychiatrist has over 20 years of clinical experience, and tells me that in any case people can have rational bases for depression. Perhaps it's just a matter of getting yourself feeling good about what you actually do! Having said that though, I still take anti-depressants as back-up. Just a small dose of course. But "Feeling Good" is a very popular text with me.

I must admit I find some of the research confusing. I remember reading a New Scientist article (can’t find the link now) on happiness indicating that most of your happiness is genetically determined, around about a whopping fifty percent. The next biggest contributor off the block at two per cent (yes only two per cent) was marriage. This is actual marriage (ring on the finger stuff) not just living together.

To be honest, this article made me understand the genuineness. I understood many things, Related to the topic. I keep on wondering why people keep on wondering so much on the topic. People should start reading your blog in order to get maximum information on the stuff. Things will become more significant after reading your articles. The way these article are full of information and the comments posted show the popularity of your posts.

I do not know if is possible search to the happiness, I'm no sure, one example that it is possible is the story of Cris Garner in the movie "The Pursuit of Happyness" but I think that somepeople can get a bad message in the movie because it is like this "if get money , get happiness!" 22dd

Your blog is outrageous! I mean, Ive never been so entertained by anything in my life! Your vids are perfect for this. I mean, how did you manage to find something that matches your style of writing so well? Im really happy I started reading this today. Youve got a follower in me for sure!

Hi, I found your blog and read a couple of the posts here. I’ve to say that your blog post are very informative. Your blog have benefited me in many ways and I want to say thank you! I will be comming back often.

Thanks for this post! People should start reading your blog in order to get maximum information on the stuff. Things will become more significant after reading your articles. The way these article are full of information and the comments posted show the popularity of your posts.