31 December 2003 — Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web and director of the

World Wide Web Consortium

(W3C), will be made a

Knight Commander, Order of the British Empire

(KBE) by Queen Elizabeth. This was announced earlier
today by Buckingham Palace as part of the 2004 New Year's Honours list.

The rank of Knight Commander is the second most senior rank of the Order of the British Empire, one of the Orders of Chivalry
awarded. Berners-Lee, 48, a British citizen who lives in the United States, is being knighted in recognition of his "services to
the global development of the Internet" through the invention of the World Wide Web.

"This is an honor which applies to the whole Web development community, and to the inventors and developers of the Internet, whose
work made the Web possible," stated Berners-Lee. "I accept this as an endorsement of the spirit of the Web; of building it in a
decentralized way; of making best efforts to keep it open and fair; and of ensuring its fundamental technologies are available to
all for broad use and innovation, and without having to pay licensing fees."

"By recognizing the Web in such a significant way, it also makes clear the responsibility its creators and users share," he
continued. "Information technology changes the world, and as a result, its practitioners cannot be disconnected from its technical
and societal impacts. Rather, we share a responsibility to make this work for the common good, and to take into account the diverse
populations it serves." For more information see:

ISOC is a global not-for-profit membership organisation founded in 1991 to provide leadership in Internet-related standards,
education, and policy issues. We are dedicated to ensuring the open development, evolution and use of the Internet for the benefit
of people throughout the world. Our education initiatives, for example, have helped bring Internet connectivity to virtually all
developing countries over the last 12 years.

ISOC is the organisational home of the

Internet Engineering Task Force

(IETF)—an open consensus-based group
responsible for defining Internet protocols and standards. Through our participation in WSIS 2003 we aim to increase understanding
and awareness of what is important in order to develop and maintain the Internet's stability, open nature and global
reach.

The Internet has come of Age

In many countries, the Internet has become a mass medium. This has brought with it reflexive pressure on policy makers to regulate
it as if it were radio, television, or other mass media. While Governments naturally seek to address their citizens' interests
regarding online privacy, spam, Internet security, intellectual property protection, the price of Internet access, and the digital
divide, our position is that better use of technology, and broad participation in today's Internet coordination processes, not
Government regulation, are the most effective and appropriate ways to satisfy these concerns.

The biggest barrier to the Internet fulfilling its immense potential could turn out to be misinformed and inappropriate
intervention in the way in which the Internet's technologies, resources and policies are developed, deployed and coordinated. The
Internet Society can help provide guidance here.

What is the nature of the Internet?

The Internet is a modern distributed communications medium. No one is in charge of the Internet and yet everyone is in charge.
Unlike the antiquated system of national telephone network monopolies, the global Internet consists of tens of thousands of
interconnected networks run by Internet Service Providers, individual companies, universities, Governments, and other institutions.
Some of these are global in scope, others regional or local. Hundreds of different organisations and thousands of different
companies make decisions every year that contribute to how the Internet develops.

These varied entities, together with the users of the Internet and the developers of Internet technologies and applications, have
specific needs for coordination. Collaborative processes that are critical for the future stability and evolution of the Internet,
and which should not be modified arbitrarily or abruptly, satisfy these needs.

Coordination, not Governance

It is misleading to use the term "Internet Governance" when the Internet is clearly not a single entity to govern. It is more
useful to refer to "Internet Coordination." The multiple facets of the Internet require different types of coordination, each
calling for specific competencies and sensitivities to balance the needs of the Internet user community globally and locally.
Specific Internet Coordination activities are taking place globally at three levels:

Coordination of the definition of Internet standards

Coordination of the availability and assignment of Internet resources

Coordination of the policies preventing misuse of the Internet

This coordination is best performed by the existing set of organisations using proven processes. Because of the diverse nature of
these activities, it is unrealistic to expect a single body— Government or otherwise—to take on all these roles
effectively.

Coordinating Internet standards

The IETF under the umbrella of the Internet Society, is one of the oldest and most successful Internet coordination processes.
Other organisations are also involved in Internet-related standards, including the IEEE, the W3C and the ITU.

Many of the protocols at the heart of today's Internet (for example, TCP, IP, HTTP, FTP, SMTP, Telnet, PPP, POP3, the DNS protocol
etc.) were developed through IETF standards activities. The results of the IETF are well engineered and practical open protocol
standards that are trusted and open to global implementation with little or no licensing restrictions—they are freely
available on the Internet, without cost, to everyone.

The strength of the IETF process lies in its unique culture and talented global community of network designers, network operators,
service providers, equipment vendors, and researchers. They all openly contribute their individual technical experience and
engineering wisdom in an environment that fosters innovation and the open exchange of ideas. This process, which is open to anyone,
helps quickly identify and articulate problems of common interest. It also helps build the trust required to make the further
investments necessary for a protocol to be usefully implemented and deployed. Ultimately, however, it is the Internet users
themselves that determine whether or not a protocol is valuable and useful enough for widespread use. Here the IETF track record of
producing useful, widely deployed protocols is unrivaled.

Coordinating Internet resources: The Internet Registry System

There has always been a need to manage the allocation of Internet resources such as the unique addresses that identify devices
connected to the Internet (IP addresses), generic top-level domain names (for example,

), and the systems that translate domain names into IP addresses
(for example, the

Domain Name System

or DNS).

This coordination activity has been handled by long-standing, not-forprofit membership organisations such as the

Regional
Internet Registries

(RIRs) and

top-level domain

(TLD) registries.

More recently, coordination at a global level has been supported by the

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers

(ICANN). Established in 1998, ICANN is also a not-for-profit organisation. Business, technical, non-commercial,
academic, governmental and end-user communities participate in ICANN.

These organisations are a meeting point for bottom-up, consensual, industrial self-regulation by the groups and individuals that
use their services and resources.

Coordinating policies preventing misuse of the Internet

As we have seen, organisations such as the RIRs, TLD registries, ICANN and the IETF all have very specific roles. It is neither
within their charters, nor within their capabilities, to take on responsibility for all areas of Internet
Coordination—particularly that of preventing inappropriate use of the Internet. For example, areas such as "cyber crime" (for
example, fraud and child pornography) require coordinated global attention by lawmakers—and not by those responsible for the
equitable coordination of the underlying Internet infrastructure. Security matters also need to be addressed by organisations
providing Internet access (not only by standards developers), and intellectual property issues may best be handled by
organisations such as the

World Intellectual Property Organization

(WIPO).

In discussions about these broader Internet policy issues there is cooperation between all the organisations mentioned above. ICANN
for example works with WIPO to implement its

Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy

(UDRP). And the Internet
Society, with technical advice from the IETF, works with Governments and policy makers to explain the effects and possibilities of
new Internet technologies.

The way forward: Make your voice heard

Existing consensus-based processes have given us the Internet and have successfully coordinated its phenomenal growth: thousands of
new networks, new policy procedures, new top-level domain names, new protocols etc. All of them constantly balance the needs and
stability of today's Internet with future demands.

An open debate is now needed to move towards common, globally acceptable policies, processes and technologies to prevent misuse of
the Internet. Governments have a vital role to play here as a concerted effort on the part of the Internet community,
non-governmental organisations and Governments can help strengthen and extend today's successful coordination
processes.

The successful continued development of the Internet for the benefit of everyone can be ensured by participation in these proven
processes rather than by attempting to create new untested mechanisms that are inappropriate to the unique characteristics of the
Internet.

The Internet Society remains dedicated to providing information and orientation about Internet structures and processes. We
encourage broad participation in the activities of each of the organisations involved in Internet coordination. For more
information on ISOC, visit:

Cisco, Cisco Systems, and the Cisco Systems logo are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. in the USA and certain other
countries. All other trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of their respective owners.