LinuxWorld mentions that the BRM organisors are making a paper ballot on all the 900 comments. It seems that the BRM organisors are "robbing national delegations of the opportunity to propose their own modifications".

LinuxWorld mentions that the BRM organisors are making a paper ballot on all the 900 comments. It seems that the BRM organisors are robbing national delegations of the opportunity to propose their own modifications:

The committee must find some way to deal with all 1,100 comments by Friday night — although that may not mean discussing them individually. Three proposals are apparently on the table for disposing of comments unresolved at the end of the meeting: to accept ECMA's recommendations without modification, to reject ECMA's recommendations and leave the draft unchanged on the unresolved matters, or to conduct a paper ballot on each.

While the third of those options sounds the most democratic, it robs national delegations of the opportunity to propose their own modifications, say those involved. Yet allowing delegations to submit other options to a paper ballot after the meeting is itself fraught with complications, as there is no guarantee of a majority vote — and then no meeting in which to reach consensus.

The purpose of this robbery might be to avoid any fix to the standard. MS-ECMA have not proposed any changes, and this robbery is designed to get the message that the BRM have fixed some issues.

And all the King's horses and all the King's men
couldn't put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

ECMA376 is such a huge mess that I doubt anybody can "fix" it.
What it needs is thorough redesign and a rewrite, not a quick fix.

"Hey, you forgot the yeast. And the salt. And most of the flour."
"No, we have it all right here."
"It was supposed to go in the bread, and it's already baking."
"Yes, we know. Don't worry, we'll add it later. Thanks for your comment."