@Jetpack-guy: I nearly banned you because I was so shocked when I read this!

Janina wrote:

Let's see... does anybody know My Girl? I hate this movie, but I know some really love it.

OH MY GOD THE BEE STINGS! I don't think I've ever cried so much at a Macaulay Culkin movie, before or since.

Oh yeah same here. That is one of the saddest things I've ever seen...I cried my eyes out when he dies! I love that movie though...

Anyways, I rank Shrek the Third a 4/10.The jokes weren't that great, the dialogue wasn't great either.I feel they could have made it better if they spent more time on it.Personally, I felt they shouldn't have made sequels to Shrek because the original was the best one.

007: Goldeneye

And I don't really care if you think I'm strange, I'm not gonna change, and I don't give a damn about my bad reputation! -Joan Jett, Bad Reputation 1980

It's a been a while since I saw it, but I remember it as a really good movie. I don't usually think much of James Franco, but his performance in this was probably his best. And it has some really intense scenes,

Dear god, The Thing (2011) was horrible. They say it was a prequel, but it turned out to be an incredible shitty remake of a classic. I probably wouldn't dislike it so much if they hadn't cheaped out of some real nice practical effects, and gone for some of the shitiest and lazy CGI in a non straight to DVD release. 3/10

Really?! Personally I look at it as more of a visual biography of the band, by the band, and that's probably why I love it so much. Plus I saw it in theaters and seeing Morrison on the big screen will do something to you.

Dogzilla wrote:

(500) Days of Summer?

I really liked that movie. It was real sweet. Zooey Deschanel (before she became annoying) and Joseph Gordan-Levitt were great in it. 7.5/10

Really?! Personally I look at it as more of a visual biography of the band, by the band, and that's probably why I love it so much. Plus I saw it in theaters and seeing Morrison on the big screen will do something to you.

Part of the reason I was rather disspointed with the movie was the fact that Jim's drug and alchohol abuse is common knowledge, especially to a fan of The Doors, and yet it seems to be the basic plot of this movie. The narrator mentions his drug and alchohol abuse repitively for about 80% of the movie. It would be much better if the movie focused more on the talent and charisma of Jim and the rest of the band, rather than Jim's addictions. Also, the film could have used more interviews from people who personally knew Jim and the band.

Part of the reason I was rather disspointed with the movie was the fact that Jim's drug and alchohol abuse is common knowledge, especially to a fan of The Doors, and yet it seems to be the basic plot of this movie. The narrator mentions his drug and alchohol abuse repitively for about 80% of the movie. It would be much better if the movie focused more on the talent and charisma of Jim and the rest of the band, rather than Jim's addictions. Also, the film could have used more interviews from people who personally knew Jim and the band.

Well like I said, the film seems to be more of a bio. pic of the band, not just a documentary. And Jim's drug and alcohol use was a major part of his and the band's talent and charisma. It had its ups and its downs. But whatever, man. At least you gave it shot, man.