Agender – Someone who does not identify with any sort of gender identity. This term may also be used by someone who intentionally has no recognizable gender presentation. Some people use similar terms such as “genderless” and “gender neutral”.

As in your guess is as good as mine.

Androgyne/Androgynous – someone who neither identifies with, nor presents as, a man or woman. Being “androgynous” can refer to having both masculine and feminine qualities. This term has Latin roots: Andro- meaning “man” and -gyne, meaning “woman.” Some androgynes may identity as “gender benders”, meaning that they are intentionally “bending” (or challenging/transgressing) societal gender roles.

Michael Jackson, Prince, David Bowie, Boy George. Yeah, I get it.

Bigender- someone who identifies as both a man and a woman. A Bigender identity is a combination of these two genders, but not necessarily a 50/50 combination, as these genders are often felt – and expressed – fully. Similar to individuals who identify as gender fluid, bigender people may present as men, as women, or as gender-neutral ways on different days.

Like a psychological hermaphrodite.

Gender Fluid- someone whose gender identity and presentation are not confined to only one gender category. Gender fluid people may have dynamic or fluctuating understandings of their gender, moving between categories as feels right. For example, a gender fluid person might feel more like a man one day and more like a woman on another day, or that neither term is a good fit.

Gender fluid? WTF, just go with the flow…

Gender Questioning- Someone who may be questioning their gender or gender identity, and/or considering other ways of experiencing or expressing their gender or gender presentation.

Questioning. That probably means neither your genitals nor your brain help provide an answer. You are so fucked.

Gender Variant- an umbrella term that refers to anyone who, for any reason, does not have a cisgender identity (which includes the trans* umbrella). Others acknowledge issues with this term as it implies that such genders are “deviations” from a standard gender, and reinforces the “naturalness” of the two-gender system. Some prefer the terms “gender diverse” or “gender-nonconforming.”

Depending on their mood, they can “deviate” to some kind of variation.

Genderqueer- Someone who identifies outside of, or wishes to challenge, the two-gender (i.e., man/woman) system; may identify as multiple genders, a combination of genders, or “between” genders. People who use this term may feel that they are reclaiming the word “queer”, which has historically been used as a slur against gay men and women. This term is used more often by younger generations doing the “reclaiming” and less often by slightly older generations who may have personally experienced the term “queer” as a slur.

It’s queer alright.

Neither- Not putting a label on one’s gender.

No labels. So no one can tell what the fuck you are.

Neutrois- An umbrella term within the bigger umbrella terms of transgender or genderqueer. Includes people who do not identify within the binary gender system (i.e., man/woman). According to Neutrois.com, some common Neutrois identities include agender neither-gender, and gender-less.

There isn’t an umbrella big enough to cover that pile of incoherent bat-shit crazy nonsense.

Non-binary- Similar to genderqueer, this is a way of describing one’s gender as outside the two-gender (i.e., man/woman) system and/or challenging that system.

Outside of the two biological human sexes on earth…something from outer space.

Other- Choosing to not provide a commonly recognized label to one’s gender. When used by someone to describe themselves, this may feel like a freeing way of describing (or not specifically describing) their gender. The term “other” should not be used to refer to people whose gender you can’t quite understand or place.

As in “none of the above”. I can just imagine.

Pangender- “Pan” means every, or all, and this is another identity label such like genderqueer or neutrois that challenges binary gender and is inclusive of gender diverse people.

“I can be anything to anyone at anytime”.

They’ve come up with 51 of these things so far, and I’ll bet that more will be added to satisfy some fruitcake who thinks it’s not inclusive enough. The Left has gone to ridiculous lengths to accommodate the fringe that has become part of their mainstream.

Leftwing rag Politico dutifully gave Holder a forum for an exit interview, which he used as an opportunity to whine, grandstand, and bloviate about the big bad racists who characterize his failures, crimes, and abuse of office as the fault of the percentage of melanin in his skin. When their argument fails, they throw the race card.

MIKE ALLEN: Now, there clearly have been times more recently since then when you have felt disrespected on Capitol Hill. How much of that do you think relates to race?

AG. HOLDER: It’s hard to say. You know, hard to look into people’s minds, you know, their hearts.

MIKE ALLEN: But were there times when you thought that was a piece of it?

AG. HOLDER: Yeah, there have been times when I thought that’s at least a piece of it. I think that the primary motivator has probably been political in nature. I’ve not been a person who’s been reluctant to express my own views about certain things, and, you know, that’s kind of who I am, it’s the way I was raised, it’s how I’m wound, and I think that probably generated, you know, the greatest part of the criticism, the unfair treatment that — that I think I’ve got.

MIKE ALLEN: Now, the piece of it that was racial, how did that make you feel?

AG. HOLDER: Yeah, it’s not something that I focused on an awful lot because, you know, the reality is I have a job to do — I had a job to do, and, you know, the criticism is going to come whatever its source. You can’t let it deflect you from, you know, keeping your eyes on the prize.

MIKE ALLEN: How much of the criticism of President Obama is infected with race?

AG. HOLDER: Hard to tell. You know, I certainly don’t think that that’s the primary thing that happens in Washington. I think there are, you know, fringe people around the country.

MIKE ALLEN: More than fringe.

AG. HOLDER: Well, you know, I mean, fringe people around the country who will say, you know, racially based things, but I think, you know—

MIKE ALLEN: But the non-fringe, the other people who criticize this president or have a beef with this president — like, how often do think race is part of that?

Yeah, damn thatfringe. They want the limited government, Checks and Balances, individual liberties, and freedoms outlined in the Constitution. They also want government officials held accountable for their actions. How racist.

Obama used race as a major part of his campaign platform in both elections. It’s a staple of his regime. We’re supposed to ignore that tactic when it’s used at their convenience. His supporters voted pigment and rhetoric over substance. They installed a corrupt, petty little tyrant who should be in Leavenworth for his crimes. Point that out, and they’ll spew accusations of racism. He’s hated because he’s black.

Like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, he never missed an opportunity to exploit trumped-up racial tension for political gain. When race riots broke out in Ferguson Missouri, he made a trip down there with a gallon of gasoline.

Every time Netanyahu wants to strike at the Iranian threat, notably its nuclear weapons facilities, the Obama regime has fits. In this case, the mutherfucker actually made a threat against the only ally America has in the Middle East. No wonder Israel is pissed.

In a report that’s likely sending shockwaves through the region, Middle Eastern news agencies are picking up a Kuwaiti newspaper’s report that Obama actually threatened to shoot down Israeli war planes if they attacked Iran to stop its nuclear program.

Al-Jarida, an independent newspaper owned by a former president of the Kuwaiti parliament, reported that the Israeli government had made plans to attack Iran because it suspected the Obama administration had reached an agreement with the ayatollahs, according to the Israeli news site Arutz Shiva.

Citing “well-placed sources,” Al-Jarida reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his top advisors had decided take military action, if necessary, to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The Israelis had not only developed a plan, but even engaged in experimental flights to make sure they could elude Iranian radar defenses, the report said.

However, the report said, an Israeli minister told Secretary of State John Kerry about the plan and Obama threatened to shoot down the Israeli plans before they could reach Iran. The planes would have to cross Iraq to reach Iran from Israel.

Unbelievable as a U.S. strike on Israeli planes might be, if the report is true, it wouldn’t be the first time it’s been suggested in high circles, according to the Daily Caller.

In 2008, Zbigniew Brzezinski who was national security advisor to Jimmy Carter and campaigned for Obama, told the Daily Beast in an interview that the U.S. military could stop any Israeli attack on Iran.

“They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq,” he said at the time. “Are we just going to sit there and watch?”

Fuck yeah, Brzezinski. Not only that, but we should help them out with the fucking flight plan.

The SCOAMF’s latest claim was that Iran won’t make nuclear weapons because it’s ‘contrary to their faith’. Last I checked, their “faith” proscribes an agenda of using any means at their disposal to kill Christians, Jews, and the ‘infidel’.

This embarrassing sack of shit is the most ignorant tool to ever occupy the White House.

Mohammed Emwazi, recently identified as the infamous ‘Jihadi John’ featured in several videos showing the beheading of hostages by ISIS, was a member of a terror cell linked to failed attacks on London’s Underground subway system in 2005.

Emwazi’s ties to terror groups have been laid out by the British government in court papers that show that he was known to that country’s security services as early as 2011. The documents were first disclosed by two British newspapers, The Observer and The Sunday Telegraph.

According to the documents, the Kuwaiti-born Emwazi was described as a “person of interest” to MI5, Britain’s domestic counter-intelligence and security agency. Officials say he was a member of a cell formed in 2007 to recruit fighters for al-Shabaab, a Somalia-based terror organization linked to Al Qaeda. The network was believed to have at least a dozen members.

The documents also show that at least one other member of that cell spoke by phone to Hussein Osman, who was part of a group that attempted to bomb London’s subway on July 21, 2005. The planned attacks were scheduled to take place exactly two weeks after four men blew themselves up on board trains and a bus, killing 52 people and injuring 700. However, in the case of the July 21 terror attack, the explosives never went off. Osman, a native of Ethiopia was later sentenced to life in prison.

Meanwhile, the Telegraph, citing Kuwaiti security sources, reported that Emwazi had become more radicalized after meeting a longtime Al Qaeda operative, Mohsin al-Fadhli, in 2007. The encounter reportedly convinced Emwazi to convert from Shiism to the Sunni Islam favored by members of both Al Qaeda and ISIS. Al-Fadhli, the onetime leader of the Al Qaeda-linked Khorasan Group in Syria, is believed to have been killed in a coalition airstrike in Syria sometime last year.

The Telegraph also reported that Emwazi also met Khalid al-Dossary, a Saudi national currently serving a life sentence in a Texas federal prison for attempting to construct an improvised explosive device.

All the information coming out about the backgrounds of these muzzie terrorist thugs, clearly proves that many of them are not the poor, uneducated, impulsive dolts that Obama portrays.

Investigators said Thursday they have recovered 32,000 emails in backup tapes related to the Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative organizations.

Though they don’t know how many of them are new, they told a congressional oversight committee that IRS employees had not asked computer technicians for the tapes, as directed by a subpoena from House oversight and other investigating committees.

That admission was in direct contradiction to earlier testimony of IRS Commissioner John Koskinen.

“It looks like we’ve been lied to, or at least misled,” said Rep. John Mica, R-Fla. at a congressional hearing Thursday evening…

IRS Deputy Inspector General Timothy Camus, who testified alongside Inspector General J. Russell George, said his organization was investigating possible criminal activity. He did not elaborate, other than to suggest a key factor is whether documents were intentionally withheld.

The emails were to and from Lois Lerner, who used to head the IRS division that processes applications for tax-exempt status. Last June, the IRS told Congress it had lost an unknown number of Lerner’s email when her computer hard drive crashed in 2011.

At the time, IRS officials said the emails could not be recovered. But Camus said investigators recovered thousands of emails from old computer tapes used to back up the agency’s email system, though he said he believed some tapes had been erased.

“We recovered quite a number of emails, but until we compare those to what’s already been produced we don’t know if they’re new emails,” Camus told the House Oversight Committee.

For a long time all the incriminating emails were buried by IRS officials seemed to have vanished into thin air, but they knew where they were. Turns out they were magically found where, by law, they were supposed to be stored as backup.

Neither Camus nor George would describe the contents of any of the emails at Thursday’s hearing.

As if we don’t know what the contents are.

Though the IG’s office is looking at possible criminal activity, Washington, D.C.-based attorney Patrick O’Donnell said the Justice Department would have the final say on whether anyone at the IRS would face charges.

This crime goes all the way up to Obama.Under his direction, the IRS didn’t have any trouble defining his preference of sympathetic leftwing groups over Tea Party/GOP organizations. Any request from groups with “patriot”, Tea Party”, or “conservative” in their name was automatically placed at the bottom of the pile or discarded entirely. IRS employees testified to that fact, and much more.

All this fucking bluster by the GOP during hearings over the numerous violations of the law and the constitution by the Obama regime won’t mean a goddamned thing unless they get off their asses and start issuing warrants and criminal charges.