Armed only with the keys on her keyboard, our Superhero/Villain roams the WEbook site, day and night, night and day, policing entries for punctuation, syntax, grammatic correctness, and general readability.

Many contributors are delighted with the editorial suggestions offered by our fearless feedbacker, realizing that her constructive criticism is aimed at helping them develop their writing muscles.

These writers view Relentless Reviewer as superhero, not villain.

Other WEbookers view posted feedback, other than a “LOL” or a smiley face, as an unwarranted intrusion into their vast creative genius. These “writers” view rules of sentence construction as mere suggestions, and are averse to making revisions, even when obvious mistakes are pointed out. They aren’t trying to improve their writing skills, or hone the craft of story-telling. Instead, like magpies, happy to hear themselves cawing, they post first-draft submissions, and allow unwary readers to stumble repeatedly over glaring errors, claiming to be too busy and/or important to proofread their work.

These WEbookers view Relentless Reviewer as villain, not superhero.

Relentless Reviewer accepts that her reputation will vary from person to person, project to project, and even day to day. She acknowledges that she has as many reputations as she has readers, and none is correct.

Even with immense super powers, she cannot please ALL of the people ALL of the time.

Rather than getting caught up in the opinions of others (which are based more on who they are, than on who she is), Relentless Reviewer focuses on the reputation that matters most . . . the one she has with the relentless reviewer in her mirror.