Former South Carolina GOP Head tweets that 17 year-old cheerleaders with big breasts are 'hot'

Former South Carolina GOP executive director Todd Kincannon sent out another creepy tweet. Apparently, he likes 17 year-old cheerleaders with big breasts. But, it’s cool says Todd because it’s legal. Todd is the creator of the TGDN hashtag, one that works in collaboration with some of his followers to censor leftists on Twitter.

.@drfeelgooddo And yes, I think 17 year old high school cheerleaders with double Ds in yoga pants are hot. And in SC, they’re quite legal.

Or maybe he’s into guys, which is cool. We don’t judge others at FreakOutNation. He does mention dicks a lot though. Mike Prysner is an anti-war activist who has been to war. But in fairness to Todd, he is probably distracted by fantasies of giving some guy a blowjob. Yes, I can say that. Again, on Trayvon Martin, he said he would, “suck dick for drug money.”

Conover was Commander of Jade Helm 15 during the failed takeover of the South. She's also one of the biggest arseholes on Twitter. At night, she can be found drinking Conservative tears while pulling off the wings of flies just because she can. She writes for other sites, too. She's an awful person but she doesn't like to brag about that.

You’re the one acting so defensive of your precious party. And you’re reading WAY TOO much into my statements, which smacks of desperation. You’re hardly an example of being perfectly psychologically well-adjusted, with your cult member-like behavior. You’re as bad as a Scientologist.

That Guy

What the fuck is wrong with you? You’re so far off the subject that’s it’s kind of funny to watch. It’s like an implosion. Do go on.

Simply asserting “You’re so far off the subject that’s it’s kind of funny to watch.” doesn’t make it so. I’m more on-topic than you are, as you simply make things up. Your idea of being on subject is simply bleating “Republicans ba-a-a-ad; Democrats good!” like a sheep.
“That would be you. Let me hold a mirror up for you.” as a reply to my reply to someone else which was “You’re the one acting so defensive of your precious party.” was stupid, as I made fun of both parties, and don’t belong to any party, because I’m not stupid enough to actually believe in the promises of any mainstream political, let alone that they’re “the good guys” and that the other mainstream political party is “the bad guys”. That’s just simple-minded and stupid. Which explains your simplistic, naive thinking. Looks like you’re the one who needs to “look in the mirror”.

Sally

Gee George. Find one example of a Democratic congressman who uses this kind of language and tweets it to the world? Just one. Dare you.

Jim Hubbard

He has a lot of misplaced anger. He would do well to get professional help to find a healthier outlet for it.

The difference between a liberal and conservative sex scandal is that only the conservative has railed out against the exact behavior he is guilty of. That is the definition of hypocritical.

Perfect example is the family values, “pro-life” Tennessee Republican Representative that was just re-elected to office even though it became public that he’s had multiple extramarital affairs (with patients), impregnated one mistress and then taped himself calling her on the phone to pressure her to get an abortion, and also took his now-ex-wife to get two abortions during their marriage. But he runs as a “pro-life” candidate (as was his wife) and the Republican base voted him back into office.

So your defense is that because the left has low standards that makes it okay, as we shouldn’t expect anything BUT sex-scandals from them? Although to be fair, the Republicans just adopt “the moral life” rhetoric to cover up for their deliberate corporate pandering, which would otherwise be intolerable to most people who aren’t oligarchs.

That point would only be valid if the shamelessly-partisan cheerleaders for everything left and Democrat were to be in favor of them being forced to resign, but the fact is, too many of them weren’t, yet think this man should be forced to resign, which he should; he’s a liability to any governing body that is supposed to look after the welfare of the people and have their confidence. To want one official but not another ousted for similar misdeeds is the height of partisan “team-player” hypocrisy.

That’s scummy. However; this would be the subject of a lot of apologist-behavior and evasive “OMG who cares! We need to talk about creating jobs!” if this were a leftist politician. So all the leftist hypocrites can stop bitching about it now.

“Well, you’re either truly ignorant or wholly dishonest.”: Says the person who sees me make this statement regarding this man’s actions “That’s scummy”, then somehow misinterprets or willfully distorts the intent of my statement as “defending” his behavior.

If I “truly do come off as a teenaged boy”, then you truly do come across as someone who presents himself as a “grown man” who is “more mature” in his behavior, who either is cognitively-impaired enough to actually think I was “defending” this man’s actions despite saying something about him that he would no doubt see as an obvious attack on his behavior and a condemnation (and hardly those of a “team-player”, probably even a “liberal”), or someone that knows better than to do what he does by deliberately twisting my words to make them attempt to be stating the exact OPPOSITE of what I said, but does it anyway.

No, get rid of them both. But don’t act like you weren’t butt-hurt about Weiner getting ousted. You know you were.

t

My friend got a dick pic from him, and it wasn’t that girl, so apparently this is a thing with him. The tweets above are just the tip of the reprehensible iceberg, the worst is when he harasses black people who disagree with him as “spearchuckers.”

I’m not conservative; haha. I’m not stupid enough to have the lopsided thinking that conservatives and leftists have, as I’ve grown past that old out-dated dichotomy. You’re the one who’s insecure, and typical of a leftist hypocrite, you engage in ad hominem attacks and snarky quips against people you disagree with, just like the rest of your ilk, all because they point out your hypocrisy, then try to act as if you’re somehow “more mature” despite this. Obviously, you’re the one who is insecure in your ideological bent, since you have to resort to such disingenuous tactics. Why is it so many left-wingers act like that?

ScottColbert

No, you’re just an idiot neither side would want supporting them. Crawl back in your home troll.

You’re just butthurt ‘cuz I made fun of your side, yet you can’t paint me into a corner, so you’re lashing out in frustration with your one-line quips. I’m just not stupid enough to take a side, because I know that BOTH sides suck; you obviously aren’t smart enough to realize this. Stop crying.

Sally

George, I assume you share you thoughts on right wing blogs too, or are you so ‘past’ the two party system that you only attack Democrats? “The rest of your ilk” appears to me to mean that you only do attack the left. And nice try, buddy, but the ‘conservatives’ attack us all the time using the same arguments you do. I have a sister like you. She claims to hate all government, but her attacks on mostly on liberals. And she loves Loser Liar Sarah.

Right-wing blogs are too easy to attack as too many are written or defended by old, out-of-touch reactionaries, and attacking them is like taking candy from a baby. They get enough attacks as it is, that the job’s already being done for me. Too many Democrats and leftists are full of unwarranted self-importance in thinking they are right about everything, and that everyone else not like them is wrong, because they don’t attacked adequately enough, as the people arguing against them are mostly too old, and being a left-winger and a Democrat is trendy amongst impressionable children. It’s the more widespread delusion, therefore is the bigger threat, thus the greater of 2 evils. Weren’t you people just crowing about the difficulties the GOP’s encountering. Sounds like my work is already done for me. So you’re saying that everyone should just be a left-winger and a Democrat, because it’s the absolute path to truth? Sounds like a cult, only political instead of religious, with the same unquestioning blind loyalty, intolerance for other points of view, and excessive credulity among its adherents to all of the claims that leftism and the Democratic Party make about their ability to create a utopia. I don’t like “Loser Liar Sarah”; as you call her; I think she’s an idiot. Not liking a lot of the nonsense espoused by one party or by the left, does not make one a member of the opposite party, or a lover of everything on the right.

“And yes, I think 17 year old high school cheerleaders with double Ds in yoga pants are hot. And in SC, they’re quite legal.”
And if a left-wing politician said something like that; you’d all immediately become apologists for him, and try to use the “what people do in their bedrooms is their own business/who cares; it’s the economy stupid; fuck morality!” I think it’s reprehensible, but at least I’m CONSISTENT about thinking that it’s reprehensible; whether a left-winger OR right-winger does it. You hypocrites are okay with it when a left-winger does it. That’s because of that political cult of leftism you belong to.

No, actually we wouldn’t. I certainly would not excuse this coming from any politician and I don’t know a single liberal that would. What you are doing is trying to defend the indefensible by merely suggesting that the other guy does it, too. What about you is so flawed that you would make any attempt to defend this guy considering his actions? Do politics matter that much to you? They don’t to me. There is a line and this kind of behavior crosses that line, period.

Guest

So you’re saying no single leftist (which “liberal” is merely a euphemistic code for, these days, as what passes for liberal” these days is hardly liberal or tolerant in the way that name implies) would do this? That’s an old argument. “No one like me would condone or excuse that!” Whatever. Just because no o

So you’re saying no single leftist (which “liberal” is merely a
euphemistic code for, these days, as what passes for liberal” these days
is hardly liberal or tolerant in the way that name implies) would do
this? That’s an old argument. “No one like me would condone or excuse
that!” Whatever. Just because no one YOU know would do that, does not mean NO leftist would do that EVER. I’m not defending this politician’s action; I said they were reprehensible. Or did you forget? (conveniently) Politricks apparently mean a lot to you, more than pointing out people’s hypocrisy does to me, if you have to resort to these tactics, or are so defensive of leftists’ “Gotcha” tactics and hypocrisy that you try to claim that I am for this guy’s sleazy statements.

Despite South Carolina’s screwed up law that makes it legal to bed down a 17-year old girl, I do not agree with this and would never put this into the category of “what people do in their bedrooms is their own business”. When it involves two consenting adults, it become their business alone. 17-years old is not an adult.

Do you really need this explained to you or are you here to argue just for the sake of argument?

I don’t agree with it either, but it is the law so legally they are an adult capable of consent (no matter how stupid that law is), and there are leftists who would argue in favor of this politician if he were a leftist; stop acting like they are all somehow magically virtuous by mere virtue of their leftism; you’re showing your bias. I would change this law if I were in a position to do so, as I don’t agree with it either.
Do YOU need the state laws of consent or leftist apologist behavior and self-serving hypocritical criticisms of their opponents explained to YOU; or are you just going to keep make excuses for leftist hypocrisy?

“Or maybe he’s into guys, which is cool. We don’t judge others at
FreakOutNation. He does mention dicks a lot though. Mike Prysner is an
anti-war activist who has been to war. But in fairness to Todd, he is
probably distracted by fantasies of giving some guy a blowjob. Yes, I
can say that. Again, on Trayvon Martin, he said he would, “suck dick for
drug money.”
It’s not that we’re making fun of him for possibly being gay…it’s just…. he’d be gay. (which anyone being gay you secretly find to be contemptible, but are willing to hold your noses for if it results in more votes for leftist politicians). The trying to imply someone’s homosexuality to insult someone while claiming that you “have no problem with it” is an old tactic of the left, a disingenuous one at that, which reveals more about you than it does about him. It’s gay-baiting, which among the left is hypocritical, but to be expected from leftists, since they are hypocrites just like religious fanatics, since politics is just a substitute for religion, and requires a lot of blind faith for its similarly preposterous claims. He shouldn’t be talking that shit about Trayvon; that’s just wrong, and gratuitous. But the only reason I see leftists even raising the issue is the fact that it’s a right-winger saying it, and because blacks tend to vote Democrat. Without the motive of self-interest to animate left-wingers, the issue would never get raised.

Leftists are the ones projecting when they make attempt to gay-bait by insinuating an opponent is homosexual, since they’re the ones who are “gay-positive”. Stop with your amateurish arm-chair psychology attempts; they’re an old leftist tactic and transparently obvious. You dumbasses always think no one will see through you when you fart out your one-sentence dismissals of someone dissecting your lying bullshit. The reason you keep it to one sentence is, you know you’re full of shit and that your argument is faulty, and you want to get the last word and create the impression that you’re the one who’s “right”, and that you somehow won the argument. I must’ve put an itch pretty far up your ass to have you talking that shit.

Remember, its only bad when a Liberal does it. If a Conservative does it, then its fine and needs to be protected. Remember what happened with Representative Wiener?

Brian

This is pretty much in common with his track record, and so many of his followers defend him no matter what. It’s quite sad. He’s been accused of doing the same thing Wiener did, he’s used Native American slurs, called children in Head Start dumb, made stereotypical comments about black people, Made a crude reference to blacks and the Louisiana Super Dome during the Super Bowl, and now this. And you know what? He won’t backtrack for it. In his world he can say whatever comes to mind and still not be a bigot. Such is right wing logic