At least tell us what your corroborating evidence (i.e. OUTSIDE the Bible) for the soul being there on conception is, rather than when brain waves can first be detected. Besides, considering that the penalty in the Tanakh for causing an abortion against the mother's will better matched that for second degree manslaughter than first degree murder, I'm not so sure your lawgiver really agrees with you about abortion being a subset of murder.

And if this is about euthanasia...er, is suicide necessarily quite the sin you think it is? I'm presuming that the person in question went through plenty of counseling first...

RationalWiki sayeth unto us: "Broadly speaking, the fallacy does not apply if there is a clear and well-understood definition of what membership in a group requires ("no honest man would lie like that!"). " And, uh, they're right, and applicable here. Being pro-life means opposing murder, so murderers are not pro-life.

When the principle of pro-life places the mother at risk, and effecftively kills her, does that negate the stance of pro-life?
By definition anyone pro-life must be against any kind of preventable or unecesary death. However, given the complications that can occur during pregnancy and childbirth situations can arise where a choice must be made between mother and child. How does the pro-life philosophy handle this situation.

(to my understanding most are more than happy to let the mother die in favour of the unborn. However, that still violates the principles of pro-life)

Near as I can tell most pro-choicers condemned that murder, I know I did. And to the best of my knowledge, this is the only known murder of a pro-lifer for his stance. Most pro-choicers I know condemn violence in any way shape or form.

Whereas many "pro-lifers" were dancing in the street after Tiller's murder, as well as other doctor's murders and clinic bombings, advocate killing women who have had abortions, and love to use the term "justifiable homicide".

@Wehpudicabok
Regarding 2:
Depends IMHO, on how broad your definition of life is.
Strictly speaking every cell within your body is alive. Even cancer cells, or any bacteriae that cause diseases.
Of course regarding body cells (including the cells that form a fetus) it cannot be called sentient life or life that would be independently viable (unless maybe grown by researchers in specialised nutrient solutions).

When my mother was pregnant with my sibling, her doctor told her that if medical complications arose during the pregnancy, his priority would be to save the fetus, not her. How the fuck is that "pro-life"? I'm really sick of that term for these hypocrites.