Created attachment 93208[details]
MHT to DOCX by WinWord-2007
I saved the Web page as an MHT archive. I converted the MHT file to the DOCX file using WinWord-2007 (see an attachment). I opened the DOCX file using LibreOffice-4.2.0; 4.1.5 and saw the bug:
The large part of the table cell’s content is lost. Table cell, located on the tenth page of the document, contains an image whose size is equal to the page size. All information of the cell, located after this big image, is lost.
I checked the operation of such programs: OOo-3.1.1; LibO-3.5.7, 3.6.7, 4.0.6; AOO-4.0.1. All of these programs open the DOCX file correctly, not making this mistake.
This is a loss of information and regression to old programs, so the status is critical.

Please stop adding your own bugs to MAB - there are policies in place about what MAB is and you have been asked already once to not do this.
You are missing a lot of information on the bug report, you don't tell us if it's a regression, no QA person is involved, etc ..., etc... I am removing the three bugs you put on the MAB.
Also it is highly suspicious that one email address has confirmed all of your bugs - I'm not accusing but if every one of your bugs is confirmed by the same email address it begins to look like you setup a second account just to say "confirmed" or that you are guiding a friend through confirming and that doesn't verify that this bug is has all the needed information. Here you have MOST but you are still missing some key things:
What OS are you using?
also
In this case what wold be useful is a PDF created from MS Word so we can actually see what it's supposed to look like.
Lastly - even if there is loss of data - that doesn't mean it's a MAB - we need to verify that on a very simple test case MANY USERS would see the problem - a single test case is not sufficient. Additionally, there are still other things that QA would do before putting it on MAB list.
If you want to learn about QA policies I encourage you to join the chat and actually become a contributor instead of pushing your own bugs to a list that you don't know how we use it. Thanks for your understanding

Created attachment 93251[details]
PDF (WinWord-2007 + FoxitReader-6)
(In reply to comment #2)
> Also it is highly suspicious that one email address has confirmed all of
> your bugs - I'm not accusing but if every one of your bugs is confirmed by
> the same email address it begins to look like you setup a second account
> just to say "confirmed" or that you are guiding a friend through confirming
> and that doesn't verify that this bug is has all the needed information.
> Here you have MOST but you are still missing some key things:
>
> What OS are you using?
>
> also
>
> In this case what wold be useful is a PDF created from MS Word so we can
> actually see what it's supposed to look like.
--
1. I put the ‘new’ status only when all my 4 computers confirm the error.
Each computer has two operating systems (not VMs): Windows XP (32 or 64 bit) and Lubuntu 13.10 (32 or 64 bit).
2. I write their messages after the forum discussion (http://www.forumooo.ru). So you very quickly received confirmation from one of the members of this forum.
3. I do not need a second mail address. I have it. Verify this by asking the administrator my old mail address of my registration.
4. Older programs have a different number of pages? Do not pay attention to it, because they have other bugs that were fixed at different times.
The text reading error begins after the tenth page. Tenth page contains a large image inserting in the cell. It is possible that subsequent text separated by tabs.
-
P.S. Sorry for my bad English. No time to correct the text by three on-line translators and dictionaries.

Thanks for the details :) Just in the future let QA confirm - if you think it's a really nasty bug just email the QA list and someone will check it out. Also do not put your own bugs on the MAB ever - even QA doesn't do this as it just looks bad, we need an independent and non biased person to determine if the bug belongs there. In this case, if it's just a single complex document displaying the problem then it probably does not but a bibisect would be quite helpful here so I am requesting one.

Hmm, so the above fix sounds quite unrelated: I also tried to bisect this on master, just to be sure I end up at the same commit -- but it doesn't look like that:
$ git bisect good
503b248127a92b9ad190e05f6a1d50574183cd47 is the first bad commit
commit 503b248127a92b9ad190e05f6a1d50574183cd47
Author: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
Date: Wed May 22 19:50:22 2013 +0300
Update bundled boost to 1.53.0
Modify our patches as necessary to match the updated boost sources. Drop
patches for which corresponding (or even identical) changes already are
present. Add a new boostsystem static library and use it in two places.
Change-Id: Ib59558feb56dab87a69c91b38caca8e7a9e9a22e
:100644 100644 973ebc518f66adbead4340bb103228753366a8f1 0be205470fea50bab321b4d928d87b67e7e14ffd M RepositoryExternal.mk
:040000 040000 afc5a1e28ad42c82add7bf8e2519f53a5799bba3 bff62dccaa36479a5479124c3c563cca1a5075d8 M boost
:100644 100644 38466abe0b786109a74eca55abe4af53a83ab43d 50ecc7f1354db563380bb6f3b0331cd874fcc63b M download.lst
:040000 040000 b9855320305f7b5a9237595699714013ef3bba6f db336173fdf6f8407ecc4c93971066d12a94bcca M liborcus
:040000 040000 ac42d27b96eb50784fcf145ec4fb6b8829eea68f 868c5c67851f1188f3a3b9375c5571f9f8a38b28 M sc
I suppose writerfilter simply relies on some ordering boost doesn't guarantee, but it happened to work (by luck) before the 1.53 upgrade, and since then it's broken.

(In reply to comment #15)
> Miklos Vajna committed a patch related to this issue.
> It has been pushed to "libreoffice-4-1":
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/
> ?id=364682a19713169b374d949d0fc34d105a2be5d4&h=libreoffice-4-1
>
> fdo#74357 DOCX import: fix nested tables anchored inside tables
>
>
> It will be available in LibreOffice 4.1.6.
>
> The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
> information about daily builds can be found at:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
> Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
I do not see changes in LibreOfficeDev-4.1.6.0.0+
(ID: 97197e881d609404288eaa903fa7db2c3b0c70b, Win-x86_9-Voreppe, 2014-02-27_09.25.03)