ATTACKING ANOTHER RESPECTED POSTER

If only Martin Smith were courageous enough to come out and tell us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about his dealings with (a) the McCanns' private investigators and (b) DCI Andy Redwood (and about his relationship to Robert Murat) , we would understand a whole lot more about important matters relating to Madeleine McCann's reported disappearance.

Who the HELL does he think he is, issuing demands to witnesses in a criminal case? It is NONE OF HIS BUSINESS.

No-one has to help him and his ilk 'understand' anything. Because it is NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS, they're just a bunch of sex-obsessed prodnoses on a backwater internet hate site.

Re: SMITHMAN 2 - What can account for the 17 remarkable similarities between Tannerman and Smithman?Post Tony Bennett Today at 7:58 pm

Newintown wrote:

My goodness, I can't believe your post, you leave me lost for words.

Do you really believe that someone who could be a witness to a criminal act has any loyalty to tell you or anyone else on this forum or elsewhere on the internet "to come out and tell us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth".

This is real life TB, not a game show, or "Big Brother".

On your high horse, again, Newintown?

Or high up there on your 'moral high ground'?

Have you considered the possibility that perhaps this whole expensive Operation Grange 'investigation' could be a charade, a kind of sinister 'game' being played to conceal some very unpleasant truths?

Examine all the Smiths' actions (and inactions) and statements for more than a few minutes, and the inconsistencies, contradictions and puzzles mount up rapidly.

And that's before we even consider whether the Smith did produce, or could have produced, two e-fits of two different men.

Whether I'm right or wrong about 'Smithman' or anything else to do with case, my record surely shows that I'm playing no game.

In fact I think I'm analysing a very sinister 'game' being played by others.

That's a turn up for the books, I thought you were always right about Smithman and nobody could sway you otherwise.

Have I touched a nerve? Have you been reading Cristobell's forum??

I think you play games all the time TB, for instance nobody knew you were "admin" but it has now come to light that you are, which undoubtedly is a shock to some members on this forum.

I stick to my belief in the Smiths' sighting, you can call all of the family liars, that's your choice, but people are beginning to question why you are so determined to call them liars, isn't that playing into the hands of the McCanns??????????

Re: SMITHMAN 2 - What can account for the 17 remarkable similarities between Tannerman and Smithman?Post admin Today at 8:29 pm

Tony is NOT admin. I never said he was.

Translation into non-hounder - Bennett has the keys to the admin panel but the site's in Havern's name.

This appears to be a myth, unless you or someone else can provide a link.

In any case, none of the Smiths actually mention this alleged 'report' in their police statements or in any of their numerous interviews with various newspapers.

On the contrary, the Smiths come up with various unconvincing excuses for not reporting their sighting for 13 days, like: 'Oh, we only just found out the exact time she was supposed to have disapperaed

Hounder:

Me again

Do you have an agenda for dissing everything and anything the Smiths said or saw as many people on the internet are beginning to wonder who's side you're on?