Anyway, to answer your question. Yes and No. In different societies, there are different perceptions of good or bad. In some societies, it is completely unacceptable for a lady to be alone with a guy without supervision. So, is that lady 'bad'. No.

But if some guy is a serial murderer or rapist. If someone stomps over the weak and helpless for their own personal gain, i don't care what society you belong to, that is evil. Nobody has to tell us...we just know in our hearts that it is.

Nobody taught me to be good or bad. I am what I am. If you are my friend, if you earn my friendship...I would die for you. That's just who I am. :)

We aren't inherently "good" or "bad" when we are born, those terms are terms we have made up and have no bearing on our nature when we are born. Of course we are shaped by society, not just society though, we have certain aspects, such as our morality traits in our nature, we are naturally social animals, we can also inherit certain diseases which affect our lives etc. Those are just some examples. But its not just nature or nurture its a mixture of both. Though we created society due to our nature. But in regards to how we are affected it comes down to both.

pretty much, its nurture vs nature, experiences shape what kind of person someone will be. example no one is born racist, a baby will play with anyone of any color but it's not until they get older and learn the hatred from their parents who learned it from theirs and so on

Humanity is inherently evil with a small capacity for doing "good" every now an then. If anything society leads us from the path of "chaotic evil" to the position of "lawful evil" if we are lucky. It is the best we can hope for.

I understand that good and evil are just words slapped onto concepts but think about bringing up a kid. You have to tell them not to hit and tell them to share and what not. It appears to me that traits generally deemed as negative are inherit in a child while traits that are normally referred to positive have to be cultivated and conditioned.

I don't think were born good or evil. I believe we are born a blank slate with a slight disposition towards being naughty lol.

Good and evil are false concepts. There is nothing inherently evil and nothing inherently good. There are things we can justify in this world and things we cannot. And what I can justify is different from what you can justify. Nothing is absolute.

I'd say the only thing man is born with is curiosity. Whether its the curiosity to see whats beyond what the eye can see in the sky or the curiosity to eat the forbidden fruit, all humans are naturally curious.

People aren't blank slates, people aren't inherently good, people aren't inherently evil, people aren't easily generalized. People don't fit into these neat pre-conceived boxes with nothing in between.

At the end of the day, we're animals. The same way a lion cub would kill a mouse to survive, I'm sure humans would too, without the society and education we have today, we would be like cavemen, doing whatever we could to make sure we see the next sunrise.

Society, our parents and the people around us shape our lives and how we perceive things on a day to day basis.

Survival is all there is when you go to the basics. Almost everything in the world can be explained through it, including us.

I really like Hobbes' idea of Man's nature. He basically says Man is a brutish creature who will come in conflict with one another eventually whether it's for land or food or simply ego, therefore, man invents government and laws to give them checks and balances, and keep them from killing one another.

“--dissolute condition of masterlesse men, without subjection to Lawes, and a coercive Power to tye their hands from rapine, and revenge” would make impossible all of the basic security upon which comfortable, sociable, civilized life depends. There would be “no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; and which is worst of all, continuall feare, and danger of violent death; And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short.” If this is the state of nature, people have strong reasons to avoid it, which can be done only by submitting to some mutually recognized public authority, for “so long a man is in the condition of mere nature, (which is a condition of war,) as private appetite is the measure of good and evill.”

For the people who keep saying and voting for "Blank slate". How are you defining this?

I think they're saying that good and evil are concepts, thus one can't be born good or evil, but rather they are born with the capacity to do both, depending on how they are raised and the morals that are instilled in them.

For the people who keep saying and voting for "Blank slate". How are you defining this?

I think they're saying that good and evil are concepts, thus one can't be born good or evil, but rather they are born with the capacity to do both, depending on how they are raised and the morals that are instilled in them.

I don't believe that humans can be "blank slates" in the truest sense of the term. We all have instincts and drives which arise from our biology that come hard-wired into our composition. A "blank slate" would seem to imply a kind of innocence or mindlessness or "pre-programmed" state of being.

I feel that the title question is an incomplete set of options. It might be better to re-state it as:

Are human beings inherently evil?

Are human beings inherently good?

Are human beings born as "blank slates"

Of course this requires some agreement upon the definitions of "good", "evil" and "tabula rasa"...

Perhaps substitute "selfless" for "good" and "selfish" for evil. Either way it would seem that human beings are somewhere on a spectrum between those options. I personally feel that we lean towards the "selfish".

This is the endless nature vs nurture debate, I'd say it is a combination of both. We are born with a various perspective but our experiences further define it. As for the good thing that is another monster, that varies from culture to culture or person to person.

I don't believe that humans can't be "blank slates" in the truest sense of the term. We all have instincts and drives which arise from our biology that come hard-wired into our composition. A "blank slate" would seem to imply a kind of innocence or mindlessness or "pre-programmed" state of being.

I feel that the title question is an incomplete set of options. It might be better to re-state it as:

Are human beings inherently evil?

Are human beings inherently good?

Are human beings born as "blank slates"

Of course this requires some agreement upon the definitions of "good", "evil" and "tabula rasa"...

Perhaps substitute "selfless" for "good" and "selfish" for evil. Either way it would seem that human beings are somewhere on a spectrum between those options. I personally feel that we lean towards the "selfish".

Being "good" is simply another way of saying being "moral". Being moral is another way of saying that you conform to the rules that benefit society and community.

Humans by their nature (along with many other animals) have an instinct for social behavior and community, which is a large part of survival and why we're still here as a species. Hence, we are inherently good. It's just part of our DNA and how we have evolved. Of course this doesnt apply to everyone, but to the species as a whole, yes.