Your wrath is irrelevant. Grammatically, their or his is correct. Her is not, unless all possible referents are female. His has historically been used when the gender of the referent is unknown.

We wouldn't have this problem if certain overzealous crackpots hadn't confused grammatical gender with sex. The problem is even further exacerbated by using gender (historically a purely linguistic term) as a euphemism for sex.

Wlerin wrote:
We wouldn't have this problem if certain overzealous crackpots hadn't confused grammatical gender with sex. The problem is even further exacerbated by using gender (historically a purely linguistic term) as a euphemism for sex.

I totally agree - indeed I'd go further and add in the confusion of the person with the role they hold. So guildmaster is my role (gender masculine) not my sex (female) thus I am not the guildmistress which has a whole bunch of other connotations and we won't go there

But anyway - that's all irrelevant to the confusion of the prepositions in the countdown to the speed server, which was the important bit (and is fixed).

Wlerin wrote:No bases of this player are present in regions where you have fleets or bases, or in regions recently visited by your fleets.

Best I can come up with. The problem is that the third qualifier violates parallelism, and so needs to be in a separate list from fleets and bases.

None of this player's bases are present in areas where you have fleets, bases or in regions recently visited by your fleets.

Should not have two "or" in the same sentence like that and the comma is in the wrong place.

There's nothing wrong with my comma >:U

Or my 'or' for that matter. They are two separate lists. Or rather, one is nested within the other (hence the comma).

I do like what you did with the start of the sentence, though it's still not quite there.

And all that said, the whole thing is far too wordy. I'm not sure the reason no bases are visible needs to be included here, for example. It could just say something like "No bases currently on record."

Also, don't be changing regions to areas. Regions has a very specific meaning in this context.

Wlerin wrote:No bases of this player are present in regions where you have fleets or bases, or in regions recently visited by your fleets.

Best I can come up with. The problem is that the third qualifier violates parallelism, and so needs to be in a separate list from fleets and bases.

None of this player's bases are present in areas where you have fleets, bases or in regions recently visited by your fleets.

Should not have two "or" in the same sentence like that and the comma is in the wrong place.

There's nothing wrong with my comma >:U

Or my 'or' for that matter. They are two separate lists. Or rather, one is nested within the other (hence the comma).

I do like what you did with the start of the sentence, though it's still not quite there.

And all that said, the whole thing is far too wordy. I'm not sure the reason no bases are visible needs to be included here, for example. It could just say something like "No bases currently on record."

Also, don't be changing regions to areas. Regions has a very specific meaning in this context.

Ok actually you're right about it being far too long.

How about:
This player has no bases where you have fleet, bases or regions visited recently.