Gaming Guru

Do Casino Dealers Shuffle Enough to Randomize the Cards?

Computer-automated shufflers were tested at bridge tournaments in the
early 1970s. Players reportedly were quick to notice, and gripe about, the
highly variable distributions of cards in the hands they received. These
folks weren't just imagining things. But the problem wasn't with
computerization. It was with the manual procedures to which everyone was
accustomed.

Experience with manual shuffling conditioned bridge players to expect
lots of hands with three or four cards of each suit. The machines were
dealing startlingly less-evenly distributed combinations. Scrutiny
showed that during play, cards get bunched and collected by suit in sets
of three or four. Manual shuffling didn't break up the clumps and
randomize the cards especially well, so new deals retained vestiges of
this regularity. In contrast, the computers delivered hands having wider
variances.

The same basic dilemma arises in casino card games. Standard edge
calculations presume random drawing from a deck or shoe. But, cards tend
to get clustered and set aside in characteristic ways as the action
unfolds. The question therefore arises: do the common manual shuffles
adequately mix the cards, or do remnants of the ordering remain from
previous play? And, if the latter, do any or all of the three following
possibilities pertain? 1) Solid citizens may unconsciously develop
instincts to optimize their play other than by rules that presuppose
randomness. 2) Bettors may become more successful at anticipating cards
to be drawn than expected by chance. 3) Card games may exhibit hot or
cold phases more extreme or frequent than the laws of probability
suggest.

Mathematicians have examined how thoroughly a stack of cards must be
shuffled to be randomized in an operative sense. In what are generally
considered the two classic analyses, the researchers reached somewhat
different conclusions depending on how they defined randomness. In both
cases, though, only "riffling" (splitting the stack roughly into halves,
and "fanning" the piles together to interleave the cards) was employed
for the shuffle.

The first of these studies measured randomness in terms of the
probability that card sequences could be predicted after a shuffle from
a knowledge of their prior order. Predictability remained high for small
numbers of riffles, then dropped off sharply. The conclusion was that
cards became randomized abruptly, for most practical purposes, after
seven riffles for one deck, 11 for six decks, and 12 for eight decks.

The second of the investigations modeled randomness more abstractly, in
terms of information theory. The "entropy" or uncertainty of a totally
random deck was measured by the number of ways it could be arranged.
Repeated riffling arithmetically increased uncertainty from zero to the
maximum value. This approach yielded no sharp cut-off. Moreover, the
point where the cards could be deemed effectively randomized was lower
-- after five riffles for one deck and eight for six and eight decks.

Not as many riffles are needed for blackjack or minibaccarat than
predicted by shoe size alone, because there are only 10 different
elements -- nine occurring four times per deck and one 16 times.
Possible arrangements are accordingly fewer than when each card is
unique. The information model gives the entropy for six decks in these
games as 931 bits; that of 312 distinct cards is 2,140 bits. At eight
decks, the respective figures are 1,250 and 3,025 bits. Actual numbers
of possible arrangements are astronomical: 16 followed by 279 zeros for
six-deck blackjack or minibaccarat shoes and 21 followed by 643 zeros
for 312 distinct cards.

How many riffles do they do at your favorite casino? It's usually no
more than four. And, the coarseness and consistency of the interleaving
has an impact. However, statisticians say casinos rarely randomize the
cards. Can this phenomenon be exploited? I'll leave this, for now, lest
you think we're into superstition. Which, strictly speaking, we are.
Still, it pays to contemplate the counsel of the shufflers' Shakespeare,
Sumner A Ingmark:

A theorist is oft a preacher,Experience, an awesome teacher,
Wise bettors won't spurn either feature.

Casino City is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control.
Warning: You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a
Casino or placing a wager. There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the world with Internet access and
hundreds of different games and gambling opportunities available on the Internet.
YOU are responsible for determining if it is legal for YOU to play any particular games or place any
particular wager.