That's correct. The media keeps misusing the term to exclusively mean "anti-Jew", yet whenever a Jew clearly expresses dislike for Arabs he is really being as "anti-Semitic" as the most radical Arabs who dislike Jews.

Location: In the Socialist Republic of Canuckistan wherein the betrayal of our white race is in full swing.

Posts: 35,602

Re: Effective use of terms: Example, Anti-Caucasian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alejandro

Nor is ‘anti-Semite’ equivalent to ‘anti-Jew’. The majority of the world’s Semites are Arabs, whom the Jews perceive as their enemies and thus as anti-Semites. Yet ‘anti-Semite’ has worked for the Jews in a way that ‘anti-Jew’ never could have done. Let us learn from them and employ ‘anti-Caucasian’ to our benefit.

It is what most people in the English speaking world perceive that counts. Jews have monopolized the term "anti-semitic" as being anti-jewish. Remember, the other semites are all cattle in a jew's mind and don't count.

We are currently fighting a war of words. These words and their connotations
are supremely important. People must be reached first by rapport and feeling, and then by logic. Most of us here are the ones that can run through the logic first anyway, the percent of the population that consists of the "free-thinkers" as Nick Griffin says in his Euro speech (if I remember correctly.) The majority of people need to "understand" emotionally before they are receptive in any way to logic and rationality. This has been why a great deal of intelligent movements have fallen short, because they could convince the mind but not the heart.

To convince the heart, emotionally-charged words need to be used. For a good analysis of this, we can simply watch our "clever" friends the Jews. They blatantly argue for their own thinly-veiled racial self-interest, yet the majority of people symphasize with them and look over the crimes of the Jew against them, because it would be "racist" for them to talk about that. They use the trick of creating double standards, by changing the way words are used to create a common "background" for the logic.

To win, we must learn all the strategies of the Jew and then turn them around to the good of our people. A sword is a sword; a gun is a gun; words are just words; the way they are used serve as the qualifiers as to whether they are good or not.

So, we must examine the strategy of the Jew and admit where he has done well in creating excellent tactics and then turn it to our advantage. And then, using our creativity we must create our own tactics to ensure our victory.

Anti-semitism is a very effective word. You can't really turn that word around, and even more precisely it confuses many people. Is it religious, or is it racial? The jews use it to best benefit themselves, in whatever context they need.

Unlike jew-hater, this term cannot be turned around. There is a suboconcious connotation of a "jew that hates" to this term that many would use to say "people who hate jews."

In an argument we could say, "I'm certainly not a jew-hater, but you're definately a JEW-hater!"

Clever isn't it..?

Here is what I posted to ideology on this topic:

--

Why don't jews use the term jew-hater?

Well people call us "white haters," meaning "white people who hate" right?

Instead of meaning, "people who hate white people."

Almost seems like they did that on purpose..... So, we can't use the term "white-hater"....

Hmm, I bet alot of white people turned that term, "jew-hater" around and said that the white people weren't "jew-haters" but the jews were "jew-haters."

Oooh, do you get it now? Clever Clever..

Anti-semitism can't be turned around in an argument; "something-hater" can. Even though the word isn't specifically talking about semites it cannot be turned around.

Lets coin the new term, Anti-Caucasian for those who oppose and discriminate against the white people.

For the act of discriminating against the white race, Anti-Caucasianism.

Guys, we need this to catch on fast; the power of this would be enormous if this term became common vernacular.

Welcome to your media arsenal our newest "ultimate weapon."

--

The war in Iraq is Pro-Israeli, Anti-American, and Anti-Caucasian!

You're given the idea a voice; you've identified it. Anti-caucasian. It carries
the idea that it is wrong to abuse and manipulate white-people. It turns all the money that the Zionists have used on the word anti-semitism right around, and puts the power in our ballpark. Not only does it dull and weaken the most powerful weapon in their arsenal, it gives rise to the powerful idea that, "Whites have rights."

Get the general idea? We need to use terms that not only have a clear and effective RATIONAL meaning, but also a clear EMOTIONAL meaning. Also, we need effective terms that are nearly impossible to slander.

An example of slander:

Someone mentioned in ideology that a better term would be anti-Arayan.

This is a bad term to use, why? Because it has already been slandered. We are fighting this war to win. Caucasian is a term that is difficult or nearly impossible to slander. Also, it hasn't been historically slandered. It would seem just wierd for someone to say "Evil" caucasians. It's a very technical word. It doesn't have the connotations to the average man of "Evil" and "Hitler" and "Genocide." Of course those terms have nothing to do with the word Aryan, but the world Aryan is used specifically to brainwash people. We need to avoid it in our discourse with the public. Using the term "Master Race" is also a killer. Even "Master Race" has "Evil" connotations because no one wants to be "Enslaved." (Universally Disagreeable) Everyone agrees that killing and slavery are in general "Evil" or give them "Bad" feelings. So, because their feelings about slavery and killing are "Bad" they feel that Aryan is "Bad." I don't think Hitler meant it in that sense, but most people "Feel" that is what it means. We have to use what people "Feel" is ok before we can even talk to them. We need rapport then everything else will fall into place. Eventually they can truly learn that Aryan simply means "the noble people,"; we can tell them that after they have been freed from their indoctrination!

If we use terms that make people feel "Good" or that are connected to "Good" things like love and children and honor and justice, etc, we make our cause "Acceptable." Then not only will they listen to our logic, they will absorb it and even learn to rationalize for it because it feels good for them. This is simply human nature. With most people, ideas come from feelings. The feelings choose what ideas are accepted or rejected. Today, this same strategy is being used to destroy our people.

We must use these tactics to a noble end, to help our people flourish.

We're doing this! We're going to win; it's only a matter of fate and time.

What about anti-gentile? Caucasian also technically includes Jews and Indian Dravids.

There's two words we must kill off and replace and thats "political correctness". We need something that ridicules PC the way it deserves to be ridiculed like "semitically correct". Personally I like SC and wish it was in much wider use. Anyone have anything better?

Multiculturalism: Ethnic cleansing of Caucasian areas, or simply replace it with Ethnic cleansing, a term given a very negative connotation that can be used very effectively against multiculturalism.

Affirmative action: Anti-Caucasian or Anti-Gentile discrimination

Diversity: Rather than changing the word around, we should change the meaning around. White Pride can be said in the name of diversity, and it would be pure DISCRIMINATION and PREDJUDICE to say otherwise.

Another point to this, if we keep on using the words Anti-Caucasianism and Anti-Caucasian for our purposes, eventually people will understand the term exactly in the context we have been using it. The context will filter in to all the other uses. Eventually on dictionary.com it will have another definition for caucasian.
.

Good point. Arabs are semites but Jews have turned the word around to mean opposition to Jews.

__________________

"All that has been done on earth against "the noble," "the powerful," "the masters," "the rulers," fades into nothing compared with what the Jews have done against them; the Jews, that priestly people, who in opposing their enemies and conquerors were ultimately satisfied with nothing less than a radical revaluation of their enemies' values, that is to say, an act of the most spiritual revenge." - Friedrich Nietzsche

I'd like to point out another word that can be used effectively is "heterophobe" - as in the opposite of a homophobe. Anyone that throws the "homophobe" label on you would be floored to be called something(heterophobe) with the same(almost the same) emotional/negative meaning as homophobe. It makes them look bad with that label and would totally throw them off.