Working for the Clintons HELL I FORGOT ALL THIS STUFF-IF TRUE‏ Irmende MENDEZ

Hell I’m glad they are not my friends, they have a small cemetery all of their own.Thu, May 23, 2013 12:15:50 PM Subject: Fwd: Working for the Clintons HELL I FORGOT ALL THIS STUFF-IF TRUE

Working for the Clintons HELL I FORGOT ALL THIS STUFF-IF TRUE

The “stuff” is coming out of the woodwork now.

Just a quick refresher course ‘lest we forget’ what has happened to many “friends” of the Clintons.

1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the air Traffic controller commited suicide.

5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.

7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the WhiteHouse. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas

10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..

11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.

13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.

14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.

15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.

29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

32 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.

33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD

35 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.

36 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds

37 – Sgt. Brian Hanley

38 – Sgt. Tim Sabel

39 – Major General William Robertson

40 – Col. William Densberger

41 – Col. Robert Kelly

42 – Spec. Gary Rhodes

43 – Steve Willis

44 – Robert Williams

45 – Conway LeBleu

46 – Todd McKeehan

Quite an impressive list!

Pass this on & let the public become aware of what happens to friends of the Clintons!

HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT?

…SURELY YOU JEST!!

Who had Ambassador Stevens Killed and How the Petraeus Affair Factors In

There is the reason for an event and there is the real reason behind the event. Sixty percent of all married men cheat on their spouse. The more money they make and the more power a man possesses, the more opportunity for cheating.

I have swamp land for sale, in Florida, for anyone to purchase if they are naive enough to believe that David Petraeus, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), resigned solely based upon having an extramarital affair with the biographer-turned-mistress, Colonel Paula Broadwell. How did the affair compromise Petraeus’ position as CIA director? The FBI has concluded that it did not.

The media has suggested that the affair began in 2006. So, the ignorant American public is supposed to believe that David Patraeus was vetted by the FBI, the Secret Service and the rest of the Obama goon squad and they did not discover the affair until AFTER Ambassador’s Steven’s murder? How convenient is that? This doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the CIA’s and the FBI’s vetting practices now does it? Let me be clear again about this outrageous set of facts. The most powerful and presumably thorough intelligence agency was unable to detect Patraeus’ affair during the vetting process? America, this is what you are being asked to believe!

It is abundantly clear that the extramarital affair excuse is just one more piece of excrement piled upon a growing mountain of Oba-manure perpetrated by this administration in order to cover up the fact that they had Chris Stevens murdered by the very terrorists that Stevens was running guns to on behalf of the CIA.

Does Adultery Get One Fired?

Let’s examine this event through the lens of common sense. Adultery is indeed a violation of the Military Code of Justice and senior command officers have indeed lost their careers over their sexual indiscretions. However, David Patraeus is no longer a command officer in the military and would not be subject to these prohibitions. And the adultery prohibition is rarely enforced, even in the military, and when it is, it is used as a matter of political expediency in order to get rid of an undesirable.

Janet and David A Tale of Two Tails

Rumors persist that the way to get promoted in the Department of Homeland Security is to “provide services” to one’s superiors, especially for Homeland Security Director, Janet Napolitano. So if it is permissible for Janet to be serviced in exchange for a promotion, then why should David be any different when it comes to giving an exclusive to your mistresses’ journalistic desire to become his biographer? Yet Janet is on the verge of being promoted to Attorney General, despite her indiscretions and resulting law suit. Conversely, Patraeus is out of a job. But wait, the believability of this cover story gets worse!

According to New York Times best-selling author, Aaron Klein, whom I have interviewed on my talk show, Hillary Clinton is a lesbian who surrounded herself with lesbian aides and staffers when she was the First Lady and she continues to do so as the Secretary of State. And as the Mail Online points out, why did it not seem to matter to Hillary that her husband chased anything that wore a skirt? It is because she is a serial lesbian who has had multiple affairs.

Take Attorney General, Eric Holder, his actions, related to the topic of sex, are the most reprehensible of them all. Brandon Darby, previously an FBI informant, is speaking out on the Department of Justice’s hesitancy to assist victims of human trafficking, in particular they are refusing to help children who have been victims of sex crimes. The obvious question is, who is Holder protecting? This inaction on the part of Eric Holder is far more reprehensible, and represents a greater violation of the public trust than do the actions of Hillary Clinton and Janet Napolitano.

When one considers the fast and furious sexual life-styles of the senior cabinet members of the Obama administration, it is impossible to swallow the fact that Patraeus was sacked because of an affair.

The Patraeus dismissal based upon an extramarital affair is a cover story, plain and simple.

The Rats are Jumping Off the Ship

I do not care what people do in their private lives behind closed doors. I do not care if Clinton and Napolitano are lesbians. My feelings hold true for the President, the Director of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State or the director of the CIA. However, when a fake cover story is concocted to cover up the murder of an ambassador, as it was with Chris Stevens, then it is everyone’s business.

Many of the rats of the Obama administration are jumping ship in the aftermath of the murder of Ambassador Stevens and this explains why Patraeus was fired as CIA director. Patraeus is gone for the same reason that Hillary Clinton will soon be gone. Clinton is gone for the same reasons that Eric Holder is contemplating leaving.

Congressional Hearings Regarding the Death of Stevens Begin Soon

If Petraeus was subpoenaed before Congress in his role as CIA director, he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. If Hillary Clinton is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, in her role as Secretary of State, she cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. And if members of the Obama administration begin to incriminate themselves for their dirty deeds which resulted in Stevens’ death, then they implicate Obama.

This is Obama’s potential Watergate moment. If Clinton reveals before Congress that, as the senior official that oversees diplomatic security, that she denied Stevens’ requests for extra security and that she, Holder, Patraeus and Obama watch drone footage for nearly seven hours as Stevens and his party were murdered and that these senior level Cabinet officials blocked AFRICOM Commander, General Hamm, and the Commander of Carrier Task Force 3, AdmiralGayouette from rescuing the Stevens contingent, and then had both men arrested when the tried to disobey orders and rescue Stevens in violation of these executive orders from Obama administration.

Dead men tell no tales in this Middle East version of Fast and Furious. This also explains why Patraeus had to be sacked. He was the link between Stevens’ gun running and al-Qaeda since Stevens’ gun running was a CIA operation conducted under the purview of Petraeus. This account is partially confirmed by Council on Foreign Relations member, Dr Steve Pieczenik, as states that Stevens was running guns and missiles into Syria. You remember the missing hand held stinger missiles that went missing in the NATO invasion of Libya last year? Those would be the ones! Can you imagine the public’s further outcry when al-Qaeda operatives begin brining down American commercial airliners with these weapons. Even Biden would not be able to pardon this motley crew!

How Will the New World Order Spin This?

Only a month before the election, I thought Obama’s reign of terror was over. However, in the month before the election, the economic outcome appeared brighter for the first time in years. The housing market showed signs of rebounding. The stock market appeared stronger and the banks were actually talking about loosening credit.

The George Soros voting machines came into play. The military’s vote was compromised. All the stops were pulled out to extend the heinous tyranny of Obama by the global elite. Why? The very simple and obvious reason is that with Benghazi-Gate, the elite can pull Obama’s strings in any direction they want. If Obama gets out of line, the global elite will topple his presidency and the aforementioned Obamanites will go to prison for a very long time.

What will the next four years look like in America? Well, under the existing conditions, with Obama’s very freedom riding on the whims of the globalists, the future of America looks bleak as Obama is completely compromised.

I do not look for Obama to complete the four years of his term. I predict that the globalists will use Obama for all they can get and then they will implode his presidency. The resulting lack of confidence will destroy this country and we could very easily de-evolve into a civil war which fits nicely into the globalists agenda of totally destroying America.

17 thoughts on “Who had Ambassador Stevens Killed and How the Petraeus Affair Factors In”

First, the mainstream media is not going to give us anything truthful so we can stop reading their articles on what happened to our ambassador in Libya or the general(s).

It’s the Internet with websites (like this one) that will furnish the truth after we weed out the more unprofessional blogs that just speculate. Sadly, the Obama administration will focus it’s power at restricting the Internet to the point that truth on any issue will never be given out. Great article. Thanks.

The final stinky slinky hidden fact here is that Ambassador Stevens and many of those assigned to that CIA installation from where the gunrunning and ArabSpring staged events were directed was Gay same as bammaO and Rahm and most of that whole Chi town thug crew.

This had to be kept secret and Gay agents were sent in as they were vulnerable they would toe the line to protect careers and privileged positions where they ahd free rein to play in a modicum of privacy at least away from American intolerance.

So the bammaO and his henchmen/people all went along with the agenda set up by those banksters in “The City” in London who are hellbent on total global ownership of all lands and peoples under an international martial law.

This whole thing is a part of the “uprisings” by “rebels” who arre paid mercenaries hired by cia/mossad to pretend to be citizens of the targeted nation and ‘rebe; supplied with money,drugs and weapons by CIA/Mossad and the major HQ of those supplies came from the CIA installation at Benghazi.

many ME nations AND Russia all knew this and decided it was time to end the fake “embassy’ front and stop the gunrunning into Syria which nation the banksters plan to hand over to the Muslim Brotherhood while they suck it dry and have one more nation near the borders of Russia from whereto send missles into Russia.

Now that bammaO is sooo compromised and all his admin cohorts he is scheduled to meet with PUTIN and he better bend over and grab ankles.

This is too dirty to comment on. Hillary could have been busted for illegal procurement of a firearm which she took across state lines and it later was used to murder Vince Foster and compromise Hillary.This was over 15 years ago.The FBI told all of us witnesses to “keep our mouths shut” because there were many people around Bush41 and B Clinton being murdered and they could not protect us. The FBI needs to be disbanded along with the CIA. Too many thugs.The sons of bitches worshipping J Edgar Hoover pictured in his red nighty are the channels to the morale decay and resultant failure of the U.S.

This is a very good piece. Something is up and it cannot be good. The American people seem to be completely brain dead. Cowardice reins supreme. Your ignorant neighbor is your real enemy. America is coming apart at the siems.

No mention of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta? I had read that Panetta and David Petraeus were in consultation during the attack on the quasi-consular location of the traveling Ambassador Stevens & Company. They made their way to a “safe house” whose whereabouts were relayed by locals to the attacking persons almost immediately. Even so, folks might have been secure and safe within those confines, had the attackers not decided to pour diesel fuel into the grated windows and ignite a thickly smoking fire, as seen in the videos. The chaos and disorder of the leadership and authorities in the City of Benghazi due to the aftermath of the revolution, meant no fire trucks, no local police, and an all around lack of communication and coordination. American officials did not want to foment another Mogadishu, Somalia like “Black Hawk Down” incident, and so made the hard and fast determination not to send more Americans into the center of an urban center in turmoil, with no clear outlines. As it turned out, the City of Benghazi’s residents turned out in the following days, in dismay and in support of our Ambassador Stevens, to root out those militias who had partaken in the attack and demise of the four Americans, including the Ambassador. As for General Petraeus resigning as C.I.A. Lead, it might well be that coming from the professional military of high morale as he did, he was appalled at the immediate and continued sniping and partisanship in the wake of another American foreign policy tragedy, this being one of many. Alleging that the Obama Administration deliberately intended the death of the Ambassador or anyone else for political purposes is both silly and slanderous, and utterly reprehensible. The opportunistic conduct of those who use the gun running death on the Mexican border, or this Ambassador’s death, in a bid for political advantage, plays the American People for fools I think their conduct and choices show the poor character of Republican leaders. I am personally reminded of the way some people jump onto crime stories to promulgate their ill-advised legislative views and agendas. Such conduct dishonors the memory of the three Americans and Ambassador Stevens. They lost their lives in Libya serving our interests to bring order to a chaotic, changing situation much like the early days of our own United States and its founding.

Your analysis of Hamm and Gayouette taking military actions to intervene in the assassination of Stevens to cover his CIA operations is remarkable—along with BO and HC watching the download. I missed the MSM mention of it. It arouses flashbacks of the attack on the USS Liberty with the recall of airborne naval fighters to their ships to prevent aid to fellow sailors under attack.

There’s been another rumor floating….that there was a ‘set-up’ arrangement for the muslim brotherhood to ‘kidnap’ the ambassador (himself) and then hold him (alive and well) for an ‘exchange’ involving release of the U.S. held ‘blind sikh’ who fathered and arranged the 9-11 highjackings and attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. No explanation in the rumor for a ‘motive’ behind this sikh release, other than perhaps placating the imams over there, allowing them to get a ‘buddy’ back. But the ex-Seals and the CIA folks on detail in Benghazi were the ones who realized this caper was crap and refused orders to ‘stand down’, deciding instead to protect themselves and try to defend the ambassador. They wound up taking 80 or so of the attacking brotherhood folks to meet their 77 virgins before heavier weapons were brought in to snuff the Americans. The brotherhood thought they’d been double-crossed because there was supposed to be NO defense. So they took it up a notch. Ditto a couple of weeks later, when Hilley supposedly was involved in a plane crash at an airfield just inside Iran, where she ‘may’ have been going to ‘recover’ the deal that went south — to release the blind sikh by negotiating directly with Ahmadinejad at that airfield site. But the brotherhood, still ticked about being ‘sold out’, instead shot at Hilley’s Beechcraft being driven by an Army Colonel, with six Seals on board as ‘security’, to get even with the Benghazi mess. The Colonel crash-landed and Hilley was badly injured and a couple of the Seals were killed. Hilley was triaged on-site, then airlifted home with head injuries and deposited in a hospital, where varying stories of bad colds, life-threatening blood clots, exhaustion, and other things forced her to resign and to avoid testifying at the Congressional hearings. Perhaps she came very close to getting snuffed on this little secret mission herself and now feels that ‘early retirement’ back to one of the Clinton residences in Arkansas might be a safer way to live longer. Or maybe the deal struck with BHO about letting him run in 2008 instead of her has timed out, and the Bill & Hillary duo now want to reposition themselves to start the inevitable 2016 campaign. It’s all very ‘black’ and the American people are totally unaware of the sick drama and intrigue that’s become a euphemism for U.S. ‘foreign policy’. Oh, for JUST a little sun to be shown in the dark places!!

House Judiciary Chairman to Newsmax: Holder Should Resign

Wednesday, 29 May 2013 12:52 PM By Jim Meyers and Kathleen Walter

Rep. Bob Goodlatte is leading a Judiciary Committee probe of Attorney General Eric Holder’s actions regarding the targeting of reporters. And he tells Newsmax he is “very concerned” about Justice Department efforts to “harass the news media.”

The Virginia Republican also reiterates his call for Holder to step down, a demand he first made two years ago during the Fast and Furious controversy. Elected in 1992, Goodlatte has been chairman of the House Judiciary Committee since January.Story continues below video.

Holder recently testified before the committee that targeting journalists was “not something I’ve even been involved in.” But it’s now been reported that Holder personally sanctioned a search warrant labeling Fox News correspondent James Rosen a co-conspirator in leaking national-security secrets. In an exclusive interview Wednesday with Newsmax TV, Goodlatte discusses his probe of Holder. “We are sending a letter today– myself and the chairman of the Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations Subcommittee — asking him to explain how his answers to the committee conflict with the actions that he appears to have taken with regard to Mr. Rosen, and we will withhold judgment on what the attorney general’s actions constitute until we give an opportunity for him to explain himself. “But it is quite concerning.” The Judiciary Committee also has been investigating disclosures that the Justice Department secretly obtained telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press. “Subpoenas were issued there which appear to have been overbroad both in terms of the number of reporters whose phone-call records were sought as well as the length of time, 60 days, that was involved in that,” Goodlatte says. “[And we have] some questions about the attorney general’s involvement in that, where he said that he recused himself and turned over that responsibility to Deputy Attorney General James Cole. “We have already sent a letter to Mr. Cole asking him a series of questions regarding how that matter took place. Now we are pursuing it further with regard to the Fox News matter with Mr. Rosen, and we have sent a letter to the attorney general asking him to explain how the information that we have regarding the search warrant with Mr. Rosen conflicts with his sworn testimony before the committee. “We are very concerned about the Justice Department targeting reporters and using what could be overbroad investigative tools to harass the news media, and we want to make sure they are following the rules. But we are also concerned that Mr. Holder has again contradicted himself and we want to know why that is. We’ll wait for an answer to that before we decide what our next step is in terms of committee hearings.” Sen. Lindsay Graham has called for an independent special counsel to investigate the IRS and Justice Department scandals. But Goodlatte believes a select committee or independent special counsel would “sidetrack” the ongoing investigation. “The fact of the matter is, if we find sufficient information to justify getting this off on the separate track and delaying the investigation while a special select committee or a special counsel is appointed, we will do that,” he says. “But at this point in time it’s important that the committees involved — and it’s not just the Judiciary Committee, but with regard to the IRS, it’s also the Ways and Means Committee and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee — that we continue to pursue this investigation aggressively and look into the matter, and if we were to sidetrack to get to a select committee, that will slow down this process. “There will be a decision made later on about whether or not we need to take a different course with regard to these investigations.” Asked if Holder should resign, Goodlatte responds: “Last year in the last Congress I co-sponsored a resolution calling for him to step down, and he has still not complied with the subpoena that was given to him with regard to the investigation of Fast and Furious. “The result of that is that his noncompliance, his having been held in contempt of the House of Representatives, all indicate to me his unwillingness to take responsibility for the actions in this Justice Department, his inability to provide leadership. “Therefore it is very concerning to me, and I see nothing that would change my opinion from two years ago that he should step down.” Goodlatte also is working on immigration-reform legislation in the House. He tells Newsmax: “We are taking a step-by-step approach. We appreciate the effort that is ongoing in the Senate. We have a broken immigration system and it needs to be fixed, both in the sense of enforcing our immigration laws and in finding the appropriate legal status for those who are not lawfully present in the United States today. “We also want to make sure that we’re doing everything possible to improve our legal immigration system because we think it could work much better from the standpoint of the national interest of the United States and American citizens in creating jobs and growing our economy. “We are hard at work. We have introduced three bills in the House Judiciary Committee dealing with various aspects of immigration reform. The Homeland Security Committee has introduced and passed out of the committee a fourth bill dealing with border security. “Next week we will introduce in the Judiciary Committee a fifth bill dealing with interior security, because the problem is not just at the border: 35 to 40 percent of the people who are not lawfully present in the United States entered the country legally on visitor visas, business visas, student visas, visa waivers, etc., and simply overstayed their visa. “So fixing the issues on the border does not by any means completely solve the problem. In fact, some would argue that the biggest problem we have right now is the lack of enforcement in the interior of the country. “We are also continuing to work on the issue of what the legal status of people not lawfully present in the United States should be. I do not support a special pathway to citizenship. That would give people who entered the country unlawfully an advantage over people who have been attempting — in some cases for many, many years, — to lawfully immigrate. “Figuring out what the way forward is in terms of enforcing our immigration laws; adding new enforcement measures; making sure that no president of the United States, not just President Obama, but no president can flip a switch and determine not to enforce the immigration laws as they pertain to millions of people who are not here lawfully; and making sure we do not undertake something that will cost the taxpayers of this country huge sums of money, are all matters that we are working our way through, one step at a time.” Regarding the immigration-reform bill in the Senate, Goodlatte says: “The biggest concern I have is that long before they ever give anybody a pathway to citizenship, they almost immediately give a legal status to people before they have in place the measures that would assure that we don’t have a repeat of what happened in 1986, when 3 million people were given an easy pathway to citizenship and the enforcement measures never were seriously implemented — employer sanctions and other things. “Now we have new measures like E-Verify, which is a voluntary system we want to make mandatory for every employer. That would be implemented under the Senate rule after they’ve given legal status to millions of people. “We’ve got to make sure that if we are going to change the legal status of millions of people, we don’t have another tidal wave of people coming into the country after them.” Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/eric-holder-Fox-News/2013/05/29/id/506914?s=al&promo_code=13A72-1#ixzz2UiLr05Vo Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

US ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens gives a speech on August 26, 2012 at the US embassy in Tripoli. Stevens was killed in an attack on a consulate building in the Libyan city of Benghazi on Sept. 12, 2012 (MAHMUD TURKIA/AFP/GettyImages)

WASHINGTON — In the months leading up to his death, U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, worried about what he called the never-ending security threats in Benghazi and mentioned his name was on an al Qaeda hit list, a source familiar with his thinking told CNN.

American intelligence officials are investigating, but Matthew Olsen, the National Counterterrorism Center director, said Wednesday that it was unlikely that Stevens and his security team were killed by random protesters.

“I would say, yes, they were killed in course of terrorist attack on our embassy,” Olsen said at a Senate Homeland Security hearing.

Washington tried to distance itself from the uproar, making it clear that it did not sanction the film. But more than a week of protests have rippled from Morocco to Malaysia, spurring U.S. officials to increase security at diplomatic missions and demand other governments to take action.

On Thursday, Libyan and U.S. officials will attend a memorial service in Tripoli for the slain Americans.

Here are the latest key developments in the fallout from the anti-Islam film, and cartoons published in a French satirical magazine featuring a figure resembling Mohammed:

French magazine runs cartoons of Mohammed The French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo added to the fiery debate between freedom of expression and offensive provocation on Wednesday.

The magazine, which is known for outrageous humor, published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the Prophet Mohammed.

Iranian students demonstrated in front of the French embassy in Tehran on Thursday, the semiofficial FARS news agency reported.

But so far, there has been no violence reported as a result of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

Still, France will close embassies and schools in about 20 countries on Friday, the main Muslim day of prayer, as a precaution, the French foreign ministry said Wednesday.

It is already boosting security in some locations, including its embassies, and police vehicles were parked outside the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo late Tuesday.

In the past, Muslims in many countries have taken to the streets after Friday prayers.

Any depiction of Islam’s prophet is considered blasphemy by many Muslims. France has the largest Muslim population in Western Europe, with an estimated 4.7 million followers of the faith.

The Charlie Hebdo cartoons are not labeled Mohammed, but several, including one that appears to show a man’s naked rear end, could easily be interpreted as being depictions of Islam’s prophet.

On Thursday, the Paris prosecutor’s office said a group called the Syrian Association of Freedom filed a complaint against the magazine for inciting hatred. The magazine itself turned to the prosecutor’s office, asking for an inquiry after its website was hacked.

Meanwhile, the German satirical magazine, “Titanic,” will publish an issue lampooning Islamaphobia next week, with a depiction on its cover that could be interpreted as being the prophet Mohammed.

Staffer Martina Werner said the Titanic issue will take on film and politicians making political capital on Islamaphobia, with a cover from an old movie poster.

Asked if it is supposed to depict the prophet Mohammed, Werner answered: “Well, that lies in the eye of the beholder.”

Capitol Hill briefings The White House will roll out some of its top officials Thursday to brief members of the House and Senate about the past week’s violent developments across the Middle East and Afghanistan.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, intelligence chief James Clapper and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be on hand for the briefing.

“Innocence of Muslims” was an obscure Internet video until September 11, when rioters, seizing on it, breached the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. Protesters also attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. The film mocks Mohammed as a womanizer, child molester and killer.

Libya has taken steps to arrest those responsible for the consulate attack, bringing in dozens for questioning over the weekend, Libyan officials have said.

The exact number of arrests was unclear. One Libyan official said those arrested included suspects from Mali and Algeria as well as al Qaeda sympathizers.

In recent days, protests against the film have been on the wane, but thousands turned out for a demonstration in Beirut, Lebanon, on Wednesday, waving Hezbollah flags and yelling, “America is an enemy of God.” The United States considers Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

On Thursday, Iranian demonstrators gathered in Tehran’s Palestinian Square to protest the film, shouting slogans against the United States and Israel and “those who insulted the holy prophet,” said the state-run Iranian news agency IRNA.

Rushdie bounty raised

In the midst of the unrest, an Iranian imam in a little-known organization has raised the bounty on British novelist Salmon Rushdie to $3.3 million — a half a million dollar increase.

“The death sentence issued against Salman Rushdi was meant to dry the roots of anti-Islamic plots, and now by carrying out that sentence the sequence of these anti-Islamic plots could be uprooted and these days are the best time to do that,” Hojatoleslam Hassan Sanei said, according to iran’s Mehr News Agency.

Rushdie has effectively been under an Islamic death sentence since 1989 when Iran’s then-leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini first issued a fatwa, after Rushdie’s book, “The Satanic Verses,” was declared blasphemous and sparked protests throughout the Muslim world.

His new book “Joseph Anton: A Memoir” is an account of the firestorm surrounding the book and the death threats against him.

Sanei’s organization, the 15th of Khordad Foundation, made news when it first offered a bounty for Rushdie, but in recent years had fallen out of the public eye.

Film Lawsuit

In Los Angeles, one of the actresses in “Innocence of Muslims” is suing the producer of the film, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, claiming she is a victim of fraud, invasion of privacy and misappropriation of her likeness.

Cindy Lee Garcia filed a 17-page complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court Wednesday, which also names YouTube, the video-sharing website on which the video is posted, and its parent company, Google.

Garcia says Google caused her irreparable harm by refusing to remove the content from their site.

Last week, Garcia told CNN she had been unaware that the filmmaker dubbed over the dialogue in the movie and inserted anti-Islam sentiments.

The producers’ representations that he “intended to make an ‘adventure film’ and that plaintiff would be depicted as a concerned mother, were false,” the suit claims.

“Defendant … made an anti-Islam propaganda film, in which plaintiff is falsely made to appear to accuse the founder of the Islamic religion of being a sexual deviant and child molester.”

“Ms. Garcia has lost her job, her privacy, and has suffered extreme distress over Nakoula’s acts,” according to the lawsuit.

According to the complaint, YouTube privately informed Garcia it will not voluntarily remove the content of the video. Attorney Armenta said that on Thursday, she will seek an emergency temporary restraining order against Nakoula and YouTube, asking that the content be removed permanently.

Garcia claims since the film’s backlash, she has received death threats and unable to visit her grandchildren out of fear that they will be harmed.

Attorney General Eric Holder Snubbed By New York Times and Associated Press

Following the Justice Department (DoJ) announcement this week that it intended to invite the Washington bureau chiefs of national news organizations to an off-the-record meeting, in order to discuss new guidelines for subpoenas of reporters, Attorney General Eric Holder finds himself snubbed by the New York Times and Associated Press (AP).

Both organizations are objecting to the closed-door arrangement, insisting that any such discussions should be on record.

Following revelations that the DoJ had obtained two months of phone records of AP reporters and editors, The Attorney General has initiated an outreach campaign, aimed at the national media. A Justice Department official told Politico’s “Playbook” ”The A.G. realizes that things might have gotten a little out of balance, and he wants to make changes to be sure the rules fully account for the balance between the First Amendment and law enforcement.” He went on to say ”Attorney General Eric Holder will hold meetings with several Washington bureau chiefs of national news organizations in the next two days as part of the review of existing Justice Department guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters.

The series of meetings, which was announced by President Obama last Thursday, are scheduled to take place over a number of weeks and will be attended by Attorney General Eric Holder himself. A wide variety of media outlets are being invited to attend; including print newspapers, wire services, radio and online news organizations. It appears, however, that the Attorney General has been turned down by both the New York Times and Associated Press.

Politico received a statement from AP spokesperson Erin Madigan which said ”We believe the meeting should be on the record and we have said that to the Attorney General’s office. If it is on the record, AP Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll will attend. If it is not on the record, AP will not attend and instead will offer our views on how the regulations should be updated in an open letter. We would expect AP attorneys to be included in any planned meetings between the Attorney General’s office and media lawyers on the legal specifics.”

The New York Times (NYT) had already rejected the idea of the meeting, due to its off-the-record nature. The NYT statement by executive editor Jill Abramson said ”We will not be attending the session at DOJ. It isn’t appropriate for us to attend an off the record meeting with the attorney general. Our Washington bureau is aggressively covering the department’s handling of leak investigations at this time.”

On the heels of the AP phone records scandal came the additional revelation that the Justice Department had also issued a warrant to search a personal email account of Fox New reporter James Rosen, as part of a separate investigation. When questioned by a congressional committee about his involvement with the seizure of AP phone records, Holder had stated “with regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something I’ve ever been involved in, heard of or would think would be wise policy.” The Justice Department later admitted, however, that the Attorney General had been directly involved in discussions regarding the warrant for James Rosen’s email account.

With questions still lingering over Operation Fast and Furious – which resulted in Holder being held in contempt of Congress – and the subsequent probes into the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attack, the IRS targeting of Conservative groups and now DoJ investigations of the press, the federal government finds itself in full damage-control mode. The New York Times and the Associated Press have both been very supportive of the current administration. For them now to snub the Attorney General will be perceived as an additional embarrassment for both Holder and President Obama. http://guardianlv.com/2013/05/attorney-general-eric-holder-snubbed-by-new-york-times-and-associated-press/

Trump: Americans ‘Desperate for Leadership’

By Todd Beamon

Donald Trump declined to say on Wednesday whether he was running for president in 2016 but said that “people in this country are desperate for leadership.” The billionaire businessman told Neil Cavuto on Fox News: “Whether it’s me — or, frankly, let it be somebody — but somebody has to come along and straighten out this country. We’re in trouble.” The New York Post reported on Monday that Trump has spent $1 million to research his political standing in certain states. He told the Oakland County Republican Party’s Lincoln Day Dinner in Michigan last week that it was “highly unlikely” that he would seek the White House in 2016. “I’m looking at a lot of different things,” Trump told Cavuto. In particular, he said he wants to acquire more properties and upgrade his Doral Golf Resort in Florida. Trump said he told the Michigan group that he hoped that President Barack Obama was more effective in leading the nation. “I’d be very happy if the president did a great job,” Trump said. “Before I am a Republican, I am an American. I want this country to be great again. It’s not going to be great again.” He said the research effort for 2016 grew out of concerns by “a group of people who hate seeing the United States being ripped off and taken advantage of by virtually every country in the world. “We used to be the smart ones, and we’re no longer the smart ones,” Trump added. “We’re like the dummy — and it’s very sad. “I have a large group of people who want to see this stop. We can’t just keep doing it. We’re a debtor nation. Our airports are falling apart. Our roads and bridges are falling apart.” He declined to speculate on who might receive the Republican nomination for president in 2016, though he noted that oft-mentioned New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was “a friend of mine, and I like Chris.” When Cavuto asked whether Trump would not run if Christie did, the entrepreneur responded: “It’s just too early to see what happens. We have a have a long way to go. You’re talking about a long way out. I want to see this country be great again.” Trump would not run as an independent, however. “I’m a Republican. It’s a lot better to do it and keep the two-party system. It really seems to have worked, but it hasn’t been working so well lately. “The two-party system is good,” he added. “It’s very, very tough running as an independent, extremely tough.” On the international front, Trump cited the Obama administration’s failure to deal effectively with Syria, noting that Russia planned to send advanced air-defense missiles to Damascus to fend off a no-fly zone under consideration by the White House. “Russia is putting all sorts of weapons there to shoot down our planes,” Trump said. “This is just crazy. What are we doing? What are we doing as a country? We don’t even know who we’re fighting for.” Regarding China, Trump called America’s relationship with Beijing “a total disaster.” Chinese President Xi Jinping is to visit the United States next month and meet with Obama in California. “They’re not our friends,” Trump said. “I’m not knocking China. I’m saying I wish our people were smart so we can compete with China — because, right now, we are not competing with China.” He cited how the country manipulates its currency by artificially strengthening the American dollar to make Beijing’s currency — and, thus, its exports — comparatively cheaper. “What they do with the manipulation of their currency — though brilliant; nobody’s ever done it better — China is taking total advantage of the United States,” Trump said. “And they’re making us look like fools.” Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Trump-2016-Presidential-Bid/2013/05/29/id/507010?s=al&promo_code=13A8F-1#ixzz2UmQfzoRc Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

WND EXCLUSIVE

Historian: Obama helping resurrect Ottoman Empire?

Pattern seen in ‘Arab Spring’ interventions began in Balkans in 1990s

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Corsi’s latest book is the forthcoming “What Went Wrong?: The Inside Story of the GOP Debacle of 2012 … And How It Can Be Avoided Next Time.”

NEW YORK – Is Obama helping advance a grand plan by Turkey, with the support of Germany, to restore the Ottoman Empire, the Islamic caliphate that controlled much of southeast Europe, Western Asia and North Africa for more than six centuries?

Kaplan, a historian with a doctorate from Cornell University, specializing in modern Europe, says history suggests a possible partnership between Turkey and Germany, which has seen influence over Turkey as a means of influencing Muslims worldwide for its own interests.

He asks why the U.S. government “would actively promote German aims,” including the destruction of Yugoslavia in the 1990s and the re-creation of the Ottoman Empire through the “Arab Spring.”

Kaplan points to Obama’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, the ultimate victor in the “Arab Spring”; the U.S. backing of radical Islamic “rebel” groups in Libya with ties to al-Qaida; and current support for similarly constituted radical Islamic “rebel” groups in Syria aligned with al-Qaida.

Each of these U.S. military interventions occurred in areas that were under the Ottoman Empire.

Bring back the Ottoman Empire?

Kaplan sees a similarity between the Clinton-era attacks against the Serbs and the Obama administration hostility to well-established regimes in Libya and Syria.

He writes:

Since the mid-1990s the United States has intervened militarily in several internal armed conflicts in Europe and the Middle East: bombing Serbs and Serbia in support of Izetbegovic’s Moslem Regime in Bosnia in 1995, bombing Serbs and Serbia in support of KLA Moslems of Kosovo in 1999, bombing Libya’s Gaddafi regime in support of rebels in 2010. Each intervention was justified to Americans as motivated by humanitarian concerns: to protect Bosnian Moslems from genocidal Serbs, to protect Kosovo Moslems from genocidal Serbs, and to protect Libyans from their murderous dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Kaplan observes that neither President Clinton nor President Obama ever mentioned the reconstitution of the Ottoman Empire as a justification for U.S. military intervention.

The U.S. offered other reasons for intervening in Serbia, including a desire to gain a strategic foothold in the Balkans, to defeat communism in Yugoslavia, to demonstrate to the world’s Muslims that the U.S. is not anti-Muslim, and to redefine the role of NATO in the post-Cold War era.

Recurring pattern

At its height in the 15th and 16th centuries, the Ottoman Empire stretched from its capital in Turkey, through the Muslim-populated areas of North Africa, Iraq, the costal regions of the Arabian Peninsula and parts of the Balkans.

Kaplan points out that since the 1990s, “each European and Middle Eastern country that experienced American military intervention in an internal military conflict or an ‘Arab Spring’ has ended up with a government dominated by Islamists of the Moslem Brotherhood or al-Qaida variety fits nicely with the idea that these events represent a return to Ottoman rule.”

In these conflicts, Kaplan sees recurring patterns employed by Clinton and Obama to justify U.S. military intervention:

Each U. S. military action in Europe and the Middle East since 1990, however, with the exception of Iraq, has followed an overt pattern: First there is an armed conflict within the country where the intervention will take place. American news media heavily report this conflict. The “good guys” in the story are the rebels. The “bad guys,” to be attacked by American military force, are brutally anti-democratic, and committers of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Prestigious public figures, NGOs, judicial and quasi-judicial bodies and international organizations call for supporting the rebels and attacking the regime. Next, the American president orders American logistical support and arms supplies for the rebels. Finally the American president orders military attack under the auspices of NATO in support of the rebels. The attack usually consists of aerial bombing, today’s equivalent of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’ gunboat which could attack coastal cities of militarily weak countries without fear of retaliation. The ultimate outcome of each American intervention is the replacement of a secular government with an Islamist regime in an area that had been part of the Ottoman Empire.

Kaplan cites a recent report published by John Rosenthal in the online Asian Times that discloses reports prepared by the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, attributing the massacre in the Syrian town of Houla on May 25, 2012, to the Syrian government.

Rosenthal linked the conclusions of the BND regarding the Houla massacre to the policy of the German government to support the Syrian rebellion and its political arm, the Syrian National Council.

Recalling that Germany invaded Serbia in both World Wars I and II and actively sought the destruction of Yugoslavia in the Cold War era, Kaplan wonders if the administration’s joining with Germany in the bombing of Libya, and possibly Syria as well, is an effort to help Germany fill its foreign policy objective of restoring the Ottoman Empire.

Kaplan notes that the Obama administration’s foreign policy requires it to downplay the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida terrorist threat to U.S. national security.

Al-Qaida defeated, or embraced?

In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama spoke at a campaign event in Las Vegas one day after the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack, proclaiming, “A day after 9/11, we are reminded that a new tower rises above the New York skyline, but al-Qaeida is on the path to defeat and bin Laden is dead.”

On Nov. 1, 2012, CNSNews.com reported that Obama had described al-Qaida as having been “decimated,” “on the path to defeat,” or some other variation at least 32 times since the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. It was a theme Obama repeated last week in his counter-terrorism policy speech at the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C.

Obama also has advanced a narrative expressing U.S. acceptance of Islam.

In a joint press availability with Turkey’s President Gul at Cankaya Palace in Ankara, Turkey, on April 6, 2009, Obama repudiated U.S. history since George Washington, declaring the U.S. is not a Christian country: “And I’ve said before that one of the great strengths of the United States is – although as I mentioned, we have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation; we consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.”

Yet, despite Obama’s attempt to establish a narrative in which Islamic terrorism is not a threat to U.S. national security, evidence abounds that the radical Islamic rebels responsible for opposing Gadhafi in Libya and Assad in Syria have extensive ties to al-Qaida.

In September 2012, WND also broke the story that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight the Syria regime, according to Egyptian security forces.

In December 2012, WND reported top level al-Qaida operatives are functioning with impunity in Libya under a NATO-established provisional government.

In February 2013, WND reported that the U.S. special mission in Benghazi was used to coordinate Arab arms shipments and other aid to rebels in Libya who are known to be saturated by al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist groups.

On May 14, 2013, WND reported the attack that killed Stevens and three other Americans was an al-Qaida revenge killing that took place one day after al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri called for retaliation for a U.S. drone strike that killed a top Libyan al-Qaida leader.

Formed by Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida is a Sunni Islamic organization, whereas the Assad regime in Syria has been arguably a client state of Iran, the only nation in the Middle East in which a majority of the Muslims are Shiites.

The conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims dates back to the founding of Islam when a split took place over who should succeed Muhammad, when he died in AD 632. Sunnis comprise about 75 to 90 percent of the world’s Muslims.

The Muslim Brotherhood that has come to power in the African Islamic states following the “Arab Spring” is a Sunni Islam-dominated organization that opposes the Shiites in Iran on religious grounds.

On Jan. 3, 2013, WND reported that the Muslim Brotherhood has penetrated the Obama White House, with several American Muslim leaders who work with the Obama administration identified as Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have significant influence on U.S. policy.

On Feb. 10, 2013, WND reported President Obama’s nominee to head the CIA, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago in Saudi Arabia.

Arguably, the Obama administration’s policy of siding with the rebels in Libya and Syria may reflect the aim of isolating Shiite-dominated Iran from the rest of the Islamic world.

The logical expectation would be that a recreated Ottoman Empire headquartered in Turkey would be a Sunni organization, reflecting the Sunni-dominance in Turkey.

As the organization’s website explains, “Gatestone Institute conducts national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts – analyzing, strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible recommending solutions.”

Dem: Ex-IRS chief lied to Congress

By Jordy Yager – 05/18/13 10:41 AM ET

Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.) said the former Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commissioner appointed by President George W. Bush lied to Congress under oath when he told lawmakers last year that the agency did not give special attention to certain groups. Following the House’s opening investigative hearing into the IRS’s revelation that it gave extra scrutiny to conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, Crowley was asked if he believed Douglas Shulman lied to Congress.

“I think Mr. Shulman did,” said Crowley in an interview with Fox News. “My understanding is that it was common knowledge if they were going after political groups back then.”

Crowley was referencing a 2012 House Ways and Means Committee hearing in which Shulman, in response to questions from Rep. Charles Boustany (R-La.), held that the IRS was not targeting specific groups applying for tax-exempt status.

“There’s absolutely no targeting,” said Shulman at the time.

The encounter raised suspicions for Boustany as well, who recounted the incident during the same interview with Crowley.

“He said, absolutely not. He categorically denied it,” recalled Boustany on Friday. “But he was aware of what was going on during this time frame because we know that [a] senior technical advisor had already been sent out to Cincinnati to investigate what was going on and to report back.”

Shulman completed his five-year term as IRS chief in November of last year. He was replaced by Steven Miller, whom President Obama asked to resign this week after the IRS scandal erupted.

Shulman is expected to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee next week.

Republicans have focused some of their attacks on Sarah Hall Ingram, the director of the Affordable Care Act’s office within the IRS. Ingram previously served as the head of the office in charge of facilitating applications from tax-exempt groups at the IRS during the time that has recently come under question.

But Crowley said Ingram was not in the IRS office overseeing the tax-exempt status applications, but actually left six months before anyone at the agency found out that the decisions were being made to focus on conservative groups.

Boustany objected to Crowley’s contention, however, saying that Congress needs to get more information about what Ingram did and did not know at the time.

“I have real concerns and we have to pinpoint and get more information about what her role was in all of this, there’s no question about it. Because this whole idea about the IRS getting expansive powers under Obama-care is deeply troubling in light of what we know now.”

Boustany said he also wants Congress to dig deeper into communication between the Treasury Department and the IRS commissioner from June, 2012, arguing that it could possibly link the White House to the agency’s actions, which appear at this time to be isolated within the IRS.

“We know communication was had with treasury and if so, and of course with the chief counsel, general counsel of Treasury,” said Boustany. “I have to wonder if it went higher than that. We don’t know that yet. That’s what we’re looking for.”

Crowley said that more hearings should be held and that the Obama administration should help ensure that every document Congress has asked for is retrieved.

But he also maintained that the IRS inspector general, another Bush appointee, determined that the White House was not aware of the agency’s taboo approach to the tax-exempt status applications.

The IRS’s inspector general told lawmakers on Friday that the Treasury Department was told about its audit of allegations of unfairly targeting conservative groups as early as June 2012. The White House holds that it did not learn about the mismanagement practices within the IRS until the IG report was released last week.

To implement agenda 21 from the UN it is a treason to the USA constitution and to we the people, we know what you are doing.

Now to the people I encourage you to watch this 9 minute video so you can get an idea of what is coming to you, your family,

and you friends. If America wants to be free again we have to get rid of the UN. I will be in Washington with my freedom bell on July 4th to demand

our rights, our constitution, and our liberty from the government and back to the people.

jfernandez3333, warrior of the constitution.

· THIS IS A STORY OF SHAME, HUMILIATION, AND TORTURE THAT I RECEIVED FROM DHS.‏ Alonso, Francisco To: Lazaro R Gonzalez (lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com)

From: jose fernandez [mailto:fernjose@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:16 PMTo: jose fernandezSubject: THIS IS A STORY OF SHAME, HUMILIATION, AND TORTURE THAT I RECEIVED FROM DHS.

On October 10th 2011, as I was coming to the states from another country, when I passed by immigration the DHS sent me to the place that we call the fish tank where they put everybody that they have to clear. In this place you become a sheep or a cow, you cannot speak, you cannot move, and you can be held there for hours, since I know my rights I started complaining, to make a long story short they took me to an office where one of the DHS very strong officers said I was going to be arrested, so I put my hands behind me and he grabbed my hands and he kneed me very hard in my lower back, Then he kept kicking me, by the second kick I shit my pants. As he was kicking me he shouted not to move as I was screaming to him “I’m shitting my pants from the pain.” The pain was horrendous and the humiliation was indescribable, Under these circumstances I had to eat my pride and stay calm or I would be beaten worse, they took me to a cell with glass walls, and they tied my hands to a bench, while I still have shit in my pants, after a little while they came back, trying to apologize, the young guy who broke my back told me that he took it easy on me because I wasn’t resisting. Recently I found out I had a vertebrae broken, I have another dislocated vertebrae, and a hernia pinching my two nerves, all of this courtesy of DHS department from the Miami airport, if anybody thinks that this is not torture, I challenge them to try this experience. Since that time I have became a handicap and a half-crippled man. That is what the DHS did to me, I ask DHS next time to give me water boarding, at least the next day I wont be a cripple, like I am now. The evidence is on the videos of the security cameras on October 10th 2011 from 3:00 PM to 8:00 PM. The other part of the evidence, is in my back, which I can hardly move and I haven’t been able to do anything without being under pain. If DHS have anything to re-approach on this you are welcome to put an investigation on this case, but remember that without any doubt I would take water boarding which is supposed to be torture instead of experiencing what happened to me again. I have not shared this story before and I did not share it for sympathy.