I am a daily reader
of your content. Thank you for all your good work. I wanted to email this
because I found it extremely odd. It has to do with this plot about 6
individuals conspiring to shoot U.S. soldiers in Fort Dix, New Jersey.

I have attached both
articles in .pdf format for your info, and they are both time stamped
(Do an "info" on it if you have Macs; view "properties" if you have Windows.)

The first article
does not mention the word 'Islamic' at all. I am not alleging anything
here, other than it being extremely odd. I have never seen an article
change that quickly. With no editorial comment from CNN explaining this
change (e.g., "We earlier reported erroneously that..." or some
other editorial excuse).

I thought I pass it
on to you all.

Ben Zavala08 May 2007

*****

Note: The CLG is not
alleging any cover-up or conspiracy on the part of CNN. The significance
of the emendation to the original article is subject to numerous interpretations.
It could be that CNN forgot to mention this aspect in its first report.
It could be that they gained more information later. Or, it could be that
they decided to emphasize the "Islamist" aspect of the group in a news
meeting, so that they could help support the government's claim about
terrorism and the 'war on terror.' --CLG Editors

'The
guys sort of led them on.' Informants
scrutinized in Fort Dix case10
May 2007 He railed against the United States, helped scout out military
installations for attack, offered to introduce his comrades to an arms
dealer, and gave them a list of weapons he could procure, including machine
guns and rocket-propelled grenades. These were
not the actions of a terrorist, but of a paid FBI informant
who helped bring down an alleged plot by six Muslim men to massacre U.S.
soldiers at New Jersey's Fort Dix. And those actions have raised questions
of whether the government crossed the line and pushed the six men down
a path they would not have otherwise followed. One defense attorney on
the case, Troy Archie, said no decision has been made on whether to argue
entrapment, but based on the FBI's own account, "the guys sort of led
them on."

'For 16 months,
the FBI infiltrated the group... We [an FBI informant] provided the weapons.'
--U.S. Attorney, Christopher Christie, "On the Record with Greta
Van Susteren," 08 May 2007 [If an FBI informant provided the weapons,
the *FBI informant* is the terrorist. --LRP]

Prosecutors:
video store clerk's tip was key to foiling Fort Dix terror plot 09
May 2007 A video store clerk is being credited with tipping off authorities
to six foreign-born Muslims[?] accused of planning to assault
the Fort Dix army base and slaughter U.S. soldiers with automatic weapons
and rocket-propelled grenades. The unidentified clerk alerted authorities
in January 2006 after one of the suspects asked him to transfer a video
to DVD that showed 10 men shooting weapons at a firing range and calling
for jihad, or holy war, prosecutors said. After the video clerk's tip,
investigators said they infiltrated the group with two informants and
bided their time while they secretly recorded the defendants. The
six were arrested Monday night trying to buy AK-47
assault weapons, M-16s and other weapons from an FBI informant,
authorities said. It was not clear when the alleged attack was to take
place.

FBI
Discovers [Is Part of] Fort Dix Terror Plot
08 May 2007 The FBI "uncovered" a terror plot to kill soldiers
at Fort Dix Army Base in New Jersey and has arrested six suspects. The
ring of suspects is on its way to the federal courthouse in Philadelphia.
The feds call them six 'Islamic radicals' and say they were plotting to
attack the Fort Dix Army Base in New Jersey. The FBI says they had been
living in Cherry Hill, New Jersey and had them
under surveillance for a year, after being tipped
off by a video store [LOL!] where the suspects had taken
a training video to be copied.