The Madoff effect. The jihad loving media played the Madoff factor to the hilt. Former chairman of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, James Johnson, Franklin Raines, David Gregory's wife Elizabeth Gregory, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Geithner ...................all of those crooks get off scot-free, but the crook who robbed the Jews (Madoff) becomes the icon for the global financial crisis.

Jewish Democrats are peckerheads. They will be cheering Obama and kissing his ring as he shoves them onto the trains.

(IsraelNN.com)
A survey conducted by the Boston Review in its May/June issue shows
that nearly 25% of American non-Jews blame “the Jews” a moderate amount
or more for the financial crisis.

Furthermore, a total of 38.4% of the non-Jews in the U.S. attribute at least some level of blame to the group.

Possibly
most significant of all were the subconscious anti-Semitic tendencies
revealed based on the way the questions were phrased to different
groups.

Neil Malhotra, Assistant Professor of Political Economy in the
Graduate School of Business at Stanford University, and Dr. Yotam
Margalit of Stanford University, conducted the study. It was part of a
survey of 2,768 American adults exploring responses and anti-Semitic
sentiments vis-à-vis the economic collapse.

They found that
Democrats were significantly more prone to blaming Jews than
Republicans: while 32% of Democrats accorded at least moderate blame,
compared to only 18.4% of Republicans.

The researchers carried
out a fascinating experiment in the course of the study. The goal was
to see what happens when Wall Street corruption is explicitly
associated with Jewish financiers such as Bernard Madoff; would that
affect people’s views on bailing out big business?

To address
this question, they randomly assigned national survey participants to
one of three groups. All three were prompted with a one-paragraph news
report that briefly described the Madoff scandal, and were then asked
their views about providing government tax breaks to big business in
order to spur job creation.

The text of the paragraph about
Madoff had slight differences for the three groups: The first group was
told that Madoff is an “American investor” who contributed to
“educational charities,” the second group was told that he is a
“Jewish-American investor” who contributed to “educational charities,”
and the third group was told that Madoff is an “American investor” who
contributed to “Jewish educational charities.”

The findings
were “revealing and disturbing,” the researchers wrote. Those people
who were told explicitly that Madoff is Jewish were almost twice as
likely to oppose the tax cuts to big business. While only 10% those who
were given no information about his Jewishness said they opposed tax
cuts for big business, over 17% of those who were told that Madoff is
Jewish opposed the gestures to big business. “This difference is highly
significant in statistical terms,” the researchers conclude.

To
complete the picture, the “middle” group – those who were told that
Madoff was an American who gave to Jewish charities – produced a 14%
opposition rate.

When Jewish respondents were assigned to the
three groups, they had “the exact same policy preferences in all three
groups,” wrote Margalit and Malhotra. Nor were there any differences
between the groups on other proposals that did not deal with the
business sector, but rather with federal support for state governments
or with tax breaks for the middle class.

The researchers noted
that the greater tendency among Democrats than Republicans to blame
Jews is “somewhat surprising, given the presumed higher degree of
racial tolerance among liberals, and the fact that Jews are a central
part of the Democratic Party’s electoral coalition.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c60bf53ef01156f806862970c

Comments

32% of Democrats blame Jews for Financial Crisis

The Madoff effect. The jihad loving media played the Madoff factor to the hilt. Former chairman of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, James Johnson, Franklin Raines, David Gregory's wife Elizabeth Gregory, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Geithner ...................all of those crooks get off scot-free, but the crook who robbed the Jews (Madoff) becomes the icon for the global financial crisis.

Jewish Democrats are peckerheads. They will be cheering Obama and kissing his ring as he shoves them onto the trains.

(IsraelNN.com)
A survey conducted by the Boston Review in its May/June issue shows
that nearly 25% of American non-Jews blame “the Jews” a moderate amount
or more for the financial crisis.

Furthermore, a total of 38.4% of the non-Jews in the U.S. attribute at least some level of blame to the group.

Possibly
most significant of all were the subconscious anti-Semitic tendencies
revealed based on the way the questions were phrased to different
groups.

Neil Malhotra, Assistant Professor of Political Economy in the
Graduate School of Business at Stanford University, and Dr. Yotam
Margalit of Stanford University, conducted the study. It was part of a
survey of 2,768 American adults exploring responses and anti-Semitic
sentiments vis-à-vis the economic collapse.

They found that
Democrats were significantly more prone to blaming Jews than
Republicans: while 32% of Democrats accorded at least moderate blame,
compared to only 18.4% of Republicans.

The researchers carried
out a fascinating experiment in the course of the study. The goal was
to see what happens when Wall Street corruption is explicitly
associated with Jewish financiers such as Bernard Madoff; would that
affect people’s views on bailing out big business?

To address
this question, they randomly assigned national survey participants to
one of three groups. All three were prompted with a one-paragraph news
report that briefly described the Madoff scandal, and were then asked
their views about providing government tax breaks to big business in
order to spur job creation.

The text of the paragraph about
Madoff had slight differences for the three groups: The first group was
told that Madoff is an “American investor” who contributed to
“educational charities,” the second group was told that he is a
“Jewish-American investor” who contributed to “educational charities,”
and the third group was told that Madoff is an “American investor” who
contributed to “Jewish educational charities.”

The findings
were “revealing and disturbing,” the researchers wrote. Those people
who were told explicitly that Madoff is Jewish were almost twice as
likely to oppose the tax cuts to big business. While only 10% those who
were given no information about his Jewishness said they opposed tax
cuts for big business, over 17% of those who were told that Madoff is
Jewish opposed the gestures to big business. “This difference is highly
significant in statistical terms,” the researchers conclude.

To
complete the picture, the “middle” group – those who were told that
Madoff was an American who gave to Jewish charities – produced a 14%
opposition rate.

When Jewish respondents were assigned to the
three groups, they had “the exact same policy preferences in all three
groups,” wrote Margalit and Malhotra. Nor were there any differences
between the groups on other proposals that did not deal with the
business sector, but rather with federal support for state governments
or with tax breaks for the middle class.

The researchers noted
that the greater tendency among Democrats than Republicans to blame
Jews is “somewhat surprising, given the presumed higher degree of
racial tolerance among liberals, and the fact that Jews are a central
part of the Democratic Party’s electoral coalition.