North Shore Community Foundation

Mission

To improve the quality of life on the North Shore for all residents by accepting donations, responsibly administering assets and disbursing investment yields to support areas of need in the community

Most Meaningful Change

The foundation organizes a major fundraising event each year. Over the past six years we have raised more than $700,000, with roughly half going to a variety of community projects and the other half invested in endowment funds that have grown substantially and are now contributing annually to local social needs.

To improve the quality of life on the North Shore for all residents by accepting donations, responsibly administering assets and disbursing investment yields to support areas of need in the community

Organization Description

Community Foundation

Other Description

Did not answer

Approximate Size of the Population Serviced

200,000

Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents)

Did not answer

Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents)

20

Total Board Members

13

Financial Information (in U.S. Dollars)

Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year

$366,876

Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year

Did not answer

Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year

$305,970

Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year

$177,468

Does Organization Have an Endowment

Yes

Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year

$2,454,191

Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years

Significant improvement

Priorities and Achievements

Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization

Community leadership

Played an important role

Philanthropic gifts

Played an important role

Grassroots activism

Played a centrally important role

Inadequate government services

Played a slight role

Changes in the political environment

No role

Changes in the economic environment

Played a slight role

Government initiative funding

Played an important role

Foundation initiative funding

Played a centrally important role

Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding

Played a slight role

Favorable legal or fiscal policies

Played a centrally important role

Time Spent Working in Following Areas

Neighborhood

Fair amount of time

Locally

Lots of time

Regionally

Lots of time

Nationally

None

Internationally

None

Rate Importance of the Following Functions

Grantmaking

Centrally important

Having local people as leaders in the organization

Centrally important

Seeking local donations

Centrally important

Having a gender balance in the organization

Important but not central

Board reflective of community diversity

Slightly important

Building an endowment

Centrally important

Serving donor needs

Centrally important

Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community

Slightly important

Building inclusion and trust in the community

Important but not central

Pursuing equity

Slightly important

Accountability to local people

Centrally important

Raising money for grantmaking annually

Centrally important

Community development

Important but not central

In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas

Arts and culture

Little

Education

Fair amount

Environment

Little

Health

Fair amount

Human and social services

Lot

Human rights

Little

International relations

Not at all

Religion

Not at all

Economic development

Little

Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community

Not at all

Information technology

Little

Strengthening local or regional government

Not at all

Housing

Little

Children

Fair amount

Water

Not at all

Alternative energy

Not at all

Disaster relief

Not at all

Advocacy with authorities

Not at all

Job training

Not at all

Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years

Convening for issues of local concern

Rarely

Promote collaboration between grantees

Rarely

Promote understanding of public policy

Rarely

Training/capacity-building for local organizations

Rarely

Advocacy

Rarely

Loaned staff

Rarely

Research

Rarely

Community needs assessment

Rarely

Leadership development

Occasionally

Internships

Never

Providing space for local organizations

Never

Access to information technology

Never

Publishing/knowledge sharing

Never

Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served

Poverty

Getting better

Crime

No change

Trust among different sections of the community

No change

Equitable distribution of resources and services

No change

Social position of marginalized groups

Getting worse

Responsiveness of authorities

Getting better

Appropriateness of public policies

No change

Value of community assets

No change

Quality of the environment

No change

Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community

Getting better

Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems

No change

Networks and links between different parts of the community

Getting better

Gender equity

No change

Charitable giving through the community foundation

Getting much better

Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving

Getting better

Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years

Poverty

A few small achievements

Crime

Do not work in this sphere

Trust among different sections of the community

A few small achievements

Equitable distribution of resources and services

A few small achievements

Social position of marginalized groups

Some important achievements

Responsiveness of authorities

Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement

Appropriateness of public policies

Do not work in this sphere

Value of community assets

Work in the sphere but no measurable achievement

Quality of the environment

A few small achievements

Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community

A few small achievements

Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems

Some important achievements

Networks and links between different parts of the community

A few small achievements

Gender equity

A few small achievements

Charitable giving through the community foundation

Some important achievements

Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving

Some important achievements

Active Partnerships

Formal community associations and groups

Little

Informal associations of citizens

Little

Non-governmental organizations

Little

Local government

Lot

National government

Not at all

Universities

Little

Schools

Not at all

Businesses

Lot

Partnerships and External Aid

Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work

National association of grantmakers

Helpful

Regional association of grantmakers

Helpful

Global Fund for Community Foundations

Neither helpful or unhelpful

Particular foundation

Neither helpful or unhelpful

Other organization

Neither helpful or unhelpful

Involvement of Local People

Regularly survey local people about our programs

No

Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work

Yes

Local people control what our organization does

Yes

Have local people represented on our board

Yes

Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do

No

Actively engage local people as volunteers

Yes

All of our board is composed of local people

Yes

Account to local people about our successes and failures each year

Yes

Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further

Increased funding

Very important

Better legal or fiscal environment

Important

More volunteers

Important

Access to advice or technical assistance

Important

Better local culture of giving

Very important

Stronger civil society

Neither important nor unimportant

More responsive authorities

Important

Other

Did not answer

Most Meaningful Change

Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years

The foundation organizes a major fundraising event each year. Over the past six years we have raised more than $700,000, with roughly half going to a variety of community projects and the other half invested in endowment funds that have grown substantially and are now contributing annually to local social needs.

Suggest an Update

Submit any additional information, updates or changes to your profile. Completed sections are indicated with a green check mark. Submissions will be emailed to your foundation’s contact email for approval before being published. Thank you for taking time to suggest an update!

Your Name

Your Email

Special Instructions / Comments (optional)

Identifying Information

Organization

Address 1

Address 2

City / Town

State / Region

ZIP / Postal Code

Country

Continent

Map Address (If Different)

Map City / Town (If Different)

Map State / Region (If Different)

Map Zip / Postal Code (If Different)

Map Country (If Different)

Phone

Email

Website

Organization Leader (Name, Title)

Primary Contact’s Name

Primary Contact’s Position

Foundation at a Glance

Year Founded

Mission Statement

Organization Description

Other Description

Approximate Size of the Population Serviced

Total Paid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents)

Total Unpaid Staff (Full-Time Equivalents)

Total Board Members

Financial Information (in U.S. Dollars)

Organization’s Total Income in Last Fiscal Year

Organization’s Gifts Income in Last Fiscal Year

Organization’s Total Expenditures in Last Fiscal Year

Organization’s Grantmaking Budget in Last Fiscal Year

Does Organization Have an Endowment

Value of Endowment (or Financial Reserves) as of the End of Last Fiscal Year

Change in Financial Status Over Last Three Years

Priorities and Achievements

Factors that Played a Role in the Origins of Your Organization

Community leadership

Philanthropic gifts

Grassroots activism

Inadequate government services

Changes in the political environment

Changes in the economic environment

Government initiative funding

Foundation initiative funding

Bilateral or multilateral initiative funding

Favorable legal or fiscal policies

Time Spent Working in Following Areas

Neighborhood

Locally

Regionally

Nationally

Internationally

Rate Importance of the Following Functions

Grantmaking

Having local people as leaders in the organization

Seeking local donations

Having a gender balance in the organization

Board reflective of community diversity

Building an endowment

Serving donor needs

Acting as a fiscal intermediary for the community

Building inclusion and trust in the community

Pursuing equity

Accountability to local people

Raising money for grantmaking annually

Community development

In the Last Year, Extent to Which Programming and/or Grantmaking Involved Work in the Following Areas

Arts and culture

Education

Environment

Health

Human and social services

Human rights

International relations

Religion

Economic development

Conflict resolution/bridging different parts of the community

Information technology

Strengthening local or regional government

Housing

Children

Water

Alternative energy

Disaster relief

Advocacy with authorities

Job training

Nongrantmaking Services Offered to Community in Recent Years

Convening for issues of local concern

Promote collaboration between grantees

Promote understanding of public policy

Training/capacity-building for local organizations

Advocacy

Loaned staff

Research

Community needs assessment

Leadership development

Internships

Providing space for local organizations

Access to information technology

Publishing/knowledge sharing

Main Trends Over the Past Year in Geographic Area Served

Poverty

Crime

Trust among different sections of the community

Equitable distribution of resources and services

Social position of marginalized groups

Responsiveness of authorities

Appropriateness of public policies

Value of community assets

Quality of the environment

Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community

Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems

Networks and links between different parts of the community

Gender equity

Charitable giving through the community foundation

Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving

Extent to Which Organization Can Claim Tangible and Measurable Achievements in the Past Three Years

Poverty

Crime

Trust among different sections of the community

Equitable distribution of resources and services

Social position of marginalized groups

Responsiveness of authorities

Appropriateness of public policies

Value of community assets

Quality of the environment

Number of people and organizations working to change and improve their community

Levels of innovation and risk taking in addressing community problems

Networks and links between different parts of the community

Gender equity

Charitable giving through the community foundation

Number of people and organizations involved in philanthropic giving

Active Partnerships

Formal community associations and groups

Informal associations of citizens

Non-governmental organizations

Local government

National government

Universities

Schools

Businesses

Partnerships and External Aid

Other Institutions Helpful to Our Work

National association of grantmakers

Regional association of grantmakers

Global Fund for Community Foundations

Particular foundation

Other organization

Other Institution

Involvement of Local People

Regularly survey local people about our programs

Local people are engaged in the delivery of our work

Local people control what our organization does

Have local people represented on our board

Have regular sessions where local people advise us what our programs should do

Actively engage local people as volunteers

All of our board is composed of local people

Account to local people about our successes and failures each year

Assistance in Overcoming Main Difficulties Faced in Developing Organization Further

Increased funding

Better legal or fiscal environment

More volunteers

Access to advice or technical assistance

Better local culture of giving

Stronger civil society

More responsive authorities

Other

Most Meaningful Change

Most Meaningful Change that Organization Has Helped to Bring About in the Last Three Years