People ignorant about science – like Donald Trump – are more likely to distrust vaccination

Despite debate about the safety of childhood vaccines among some
groups in the public, an overwhelming majority of Americans (82%) support
requiring children attending public school to be vaccinated for measles, mumps
and rubella (MMR), according to a new Pew Research Center survey.

Some 73% of Americans see high preventive health benefits from
the MMR vaccine and 66% believe there is a low risk of side effects from the
vaccine.

Overall, 88% believe that the benefits of the MMR inoculation
outweigh the risks.

Yet, several groups express more concern about the safety of the
MMR vaccine, including parents of young children.

About half (52%) of parents
with children ages 4 or younger say the risk of side effects from the MMR
vaccine is low, while 43% say the risk of side effects is medium or high.

By comparison, 70% of those with no minor-age children say the
risk of side effects is low, while 29% say the risk is medium or high. As far
as potential benefits, 60% of parents with children 4 or younger say the preventive
health benefits of the MMR vaccine are high, compared with 75% of parents with
school-age children (ages 5-17) and 76% of people with no children younger than
18.

"In addition to parents of young children, this analysis
finds that adults under age 30, blacks and people with lower knowledge about
science topics see a higher risk of side effects or lower preventive health
benefits from this vaccine," said lead author and Associate Director of
Research Cary Funk.

"Public health benefits from vaccines hinge on very high
levels of immunization in the population, so it's important to understand which
groups hold reservations about the MMR vaccine," Funk said.

The survey finds that public views of medical scientists and
their research related to childhood vaccines are broadly positive, though
mixed, regardless of parent status, race, ethnicity and experience using
alternative medicine. The data:

73% of U.S. adults believe that medical scientists should have a
major role in policy decisions related to childhood vaccines.

55% say they trust information from medical scientists a lot to
give a full and accurate picture of the health effects of vaccines, 35% trust
medical scientists some and just 9% have no or not too much trust in medical
scientists. People are less trusting of other groups about this issue -- just
13% trust information from pharmaceutical industry leaders about the health
effects of the MMR vaccines a lot.

52% of Americans say scientists' research on childhood vaccines
is influenced by the best available scientific evidence most of the time, and
55% say such research is influenced by scientists' concern for the best
interests of children's health most of the time.

47% say medical scientists understand the health effects of the
MMR vaccine very well, 43% say they understand this fairly well and just 10%
say medical scientists do not understand this at all or not too well.

55% believe that "almost all" medical scientists are
in agreement that the MMR vaccine is safe for healthy children, while 28% say
that more than half of medical scientists agree about this.

"This survey looks in-depth at people's views about
vaccines to explore which groups have more reservations about the MMR vaccine
and whether or not those views are connected with people's trust in medical science,"
said Funk.

"One of the striking findings in this study is that parents
of young children express more concern about the safety of the MMR vaccine.
Yet, like other Americans, they hold broadly positive views about medical
scientists and their research on childhood vaccines."

The data show there are some generational differences in these
views, with adults younger than 30 less likely to see medical scientists in a
positive light.

People who are generally less knowledgeable about science are
much less trusting of medical scientists and see higher risk and lower benefits
from the MMR vaccine.

There are generational differences in views of the MMR vaccine
and trust in medical scientists.

Seniors, ages 65 and older, support a school-based requirement
for the MMR vaccine rather than leaving the decision up to parents by a margin
of 90% to 8%. By comparison, 77% of adults ages 18 to 29 support a school-based
requirement, while 21% of this group says parents should be able to decide not
to have their children vaccinated even if that may create health risks for
others.

Younger adults, ages 18 to 29, are a bit less likely than older
age groups to say medical scientists understand the health effects of childhood
vaccines very well and to perceive strong consensus among medical scientists
that the MMR vaccine is safe.

Some 47% of adults ages 18 to 29 think the best evidence
influences research findings on childhood vaccines most of the time, compared
with 60% of those ages 65 and older.

Those with high science knowledge and higher incomes are
especially likely to see high preventive health benefits of the MMR vaccine and
to support school-based MMR vaccine requirements.

91% of those with high science knowledge (based on a nine-item
index across a range of science topics) rate the preventive health benefits of
the MMR vaccine as high.

By contrast, 55% of those with low science knowledge
say the health benefits are high.

People with high science knowledge are more likely than those
low in science knowledge to trust medical scientists and their research.

About three-fourths (73%) of those high in science knowledge
trust information from medical scientists about the effects of the MMR vaccine
a lot, compared with 40% of those low in science knowledge; 72% of those with
high science knowledge think the research findings on vaccines are influenced
by the best available evidence most of the time, compared with 34% of those
with low science knowledge on a nine-item index.

People with higher family incomes ($75,000 or more) are more
inclined than those with lower family incomes to see high health benefits and
low risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine. Those with higher family incomes
are especially strong in their support for a requirement that all children be
vaccinated against MMR in order to attend public schools.

Groups with more concern about the MMR vaccine include those who
have used alternative medicine and blacks. But political groups hold similar
views on childhood vaccine issues.

The 8% of Americans who report never using over-the-counter
medications for cold or flu symptoms and the 20% of Americans who have used
alternative medicine instead of conventional treatment are more concerned about
the risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine.

These groups are comparatively more likely to think that parents
should be able to decide whether or not to vaccinate their children even if
that decision means increased health risk for others.

Blacks (56%) are less inclined than whites (79%) to see the
preventive health benefits of the MMR vaccine as high. More blacks (44%) than
whites (30%) see the risk of side effects from the MMR vaccine as medium or
high.

Republicans (including Republican-leaning independents) hold
roughly the same views as Democrats (including those leaning Democratic) about
the health benefits and risk of side effects of the MMR vaccine.

However, political conservatives are slightly more likely than
either moderates or liberals to say that parents should be able to decide not
to vaccinate their children -- though seven-in-ten or more of all three
ideology groups support requiring the MMR vaccine for all schoolchildren
because of the potential health risk to others. A 61% majority of Americans
give the media positive marks for their coverage of issues related to the MMR
vaccine.

Half of Americans say they follow news about childhood vaccines
very (13%) or somewhat (37%) closely.

Most Americans see reports of conflicting health studies as part
of the march of research progress.

Fully 74% of adults say conflicting news reports about disease
prevention are understandable because "new research is constantly
improving our understanding," while 23% of adults say such research
"cannot really be trusted because so many studies conflict with each
other."

Most Americans who have visited a health care provider in the
past year say they felt listened to and that the provider "really cared
about their health and well-being."

84% of those who have been to a health care provider in the past
year for an ailment felt their provider "really cared about their health
and well-being" and 80% say they got all the information they needed for
further treatment and at-home care.

Only 23% of this group reports feeling rushed by their health
care provider and just 15% felt confused about the instructions they received
for further treatment or at-home care.

30% of Americans say they "just ask a doctor for
advice" when it comes to making decisions about treatment for a serious
health problem, while 68% say they do their own research, either to check for
other treatment options (21%), to understand potential side effects for a
recommended treatment (9%) or simply to learn more about the recommended
treatment (36%).

These are among the key findings from the new report, which is
based on a nationally representative survey conducted May 10-June 6, 2016,
among 1,549 adults, 18 years of age or older, living in all 50 U.S. states and
the District of Columbia. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4.0
percentage points.

Thought for the day

Nothing funny about tired Saturday Night Live on Fake News NBC! Question is, how do the Networks get away with these total Republican hit jobs without retribution? Likewise for many other shows? Very unfair and should be looked into. This is the real Collusion!

Individual One’s tweet at 4:52 AM - 17 Feb 2019 after a long, hard day of playing golf at Mar-A-Lago on Day Two of our “national emergency.”

Information and Feedback

If you were looking for the Charlestown Democratic Town Committee website and ended up here, try this.