Twitter CEO apologizes to leftists for eating at Chick-fil-A

Left-wing hysteria over a wildly popular fast food restaurant deserves to be mocked for the dated, over-the-top, knee-jerk reaction, says a conservative activist.

“I think this whole situation is bizarre, frankly,” Peter Sprigg, of the Family Research Council, says after the CEO of Twitter apologized about eating at Chick-fil-A.

Jack Dorsey tweeted about saving money with the Chick-fil-A app, which he likely considered an innocuous gesture on the social media website, but the left-wing social justice warriors came knocking on his Twitter door.

That’s because Chick-fil-A is considered “hate chicken” by the Left after its CEO opined in 2012 that he believed in biblical marriage. That suggestion enraged the Left, which has been enraged ever since and denounces Chick-fil-A, and its chicken sandwich apologists, when the opportunity arises.

A story by Eater.com. describing how Chick-fil-A poised to jump to third place among restaurant chains, had to point out the Atlanta-based chain has a “history of supporting homophobic organizations” in a story about its popularity and success.

You Might Like

Dorsey, in fact, literally apologized for eating there and stated that he “forgot about their background.”

The backlash against Dorsey, says Sprigg, shows the level of hostility that rises when there is even the hint that someone doesn’t approve of homosexual activism.

“The ironic thing is these critics of Chick-fil-A are living in the past,” he tells OneNewsNow. “They are about five or six years behind the times because after the peak of publicity in 2012, (Chick-fil-A) actually backed off on their financial support for pro-family organizations. And they reached out to the director of Campus Pride, the organization that first started the boycotts of Chick-fil-A, and he became friends with Dan Cathy, who is the CEO at Chick-fil-A.”

So the ongoing outrage against Chick-fil-A, even you even believe it’s deserved, is outdated, Sprigg says.

19 Comments

Sheese. Being forced to grovel to the SJW Mafia, for daring to eat somewhere they dislike. What next? Being dictated to about what clothes companies you can buy from, and if you get caught wearing something not from one of those select groups, you get publicly flogged!????

I think that Dorsey should go out on the street by Chick-Fil-A and gag himself and puke everything up just to show the homo/lez, queer people that his stomach is in the right place. In order to show that his heart is in the right place with the homo/lez, queer people, he will have to suffer a heart attack. If he wanted to convince the homo/lez, queer people that he was one of them, well……………….., and that’s it…..

Only reasons it can be “sin” to eat at Chick-Fil-A:
* You own one or more Mickey-D, BK, Wendys, … franchises — example for your customers
* You’re on a really strict diet, which disallows fast-foods (of course, that also disallows Mickey-D, BK, Wendys, …)
* You’re eating fast-food a lot, and it’s murdering your budget (latter definitely, and former likely, inapplicable)

Well, i’ve known someone who worked for Carl’s Jr who DID get smacked by the bosses, for getting caught eating at a competitors fast food joint.. I’ve also heard of people who worked for Coke or Pepsi, who got done, for being caught drinking a competitors drink while at work..

“That’s because Chick-fil-A is considered “hate chicken” by the Left after its CEO opined in 2012 that he believed in biblical marriage.”

The key takeaway here is that Lefties hate the Bible. They hate Chick Fil A because the owners love Jesus. But then they pretend like that recent anti-Bible bill in CA won’t be used to burn Bibles. Yeah, right.

John 15
[18] If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
[19] If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
[20] Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.
[21] But all these things will they do unto you for my name’s sake, because they know not him that sent me.
[22] If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.
[23] He that hateth me hateth my Father also.

1. I eat at Chic-fil-a every chance I get. (HEY DAN CATHY!!! TORTILLA SOUP IS YEAR ROUND FOOD!!! I DEMAND IT BE BROUGHT BACK FORTHWITH!!!)
2. No one will ever shame me into not eating there.
3. Marriage is the union between a single man and a single woman for the purposes of procreation. Any other iteration simply is NOT a marriage.
4. Off topic but related I will never use made up or false words to “identify” someone. The most I’ll grant is not call you idiot. At least to your face.

3. Marriage is the union between a single man and a single woman for the purposes of procreation. Any other iteration simply is NOT a marriage.

So if either the man or the woman is infertile, they should be prevented from marrying?

Abraham was married to the infertile woman Sarah for decades before God blessed them with a child. Should Abraham have looked for another woman until such time as Sarah could have children and only marry her then? She was 90 at the time.

Jacob’s wife Rachel was barren and desperately wanted a child.

Samuel’s mom was barren and desperately wanted a child.

I think I need to see a biblical reference for getting married purely for the purpose of procreation.

Recent Comments

"“costs are going to go up for the wealthier, costs are going to go up for the corporations,” and “costs are going to go down for the hard working individuals.”
We heard this all before. Then our costs tripled. Remember Obamacare.
Maybe Warren can afford this but I can't.
As a matter of fact I would like her to pay back the cost..."Comment by stanparrish
Posted in Elizabeth Warren’s gasp-worthy slap at the rich

"Finland had a 2 year trial with 2000 participants to collect data that ended in 2018. The trial was set to stop after 2 years, so stopping when it is supposed to, doesn't qualify as doesn't work. What other western country has tried it?
Friedman was probably the most influential free market economist of the last hundred years. I first read..."Comment by darby
Posted in Andrew Yang: $120,000 universal basic income for 10 families