In regards of the thread, related to the lurppis being a convicted cheater in the eyes of Custodia.
He began a witchhunt stating that emilio should be banned off e-sports, then if people were to apply same logic. Lurppis got accordingly to him "wrongfully" convicted by the Custodia Anti-cheat client.
So, who would you trust, an anti-cheat that has been commercially developed, or his word of mouth?