JSCocoa only works on the iPhone simulator for now, it won’t compile on the iPhone because libffi isn’t there. And I’ve read the Python guys are having trouble with getting libffi to create functions at runtime.

@tr0y and jdalton
That’s easier said then done when you’re on “the outside” due to politics (e.g. building on Mono and .Net)
Regarding purchasing place, I don’t think an LGPL licensed free of charge library would ever have that type of pull unless some “rich uncle” would be willing to fix it. (That’s a HINT BTW)
.
I have sent in *tons* of news to the ajaxians, like when we released this one; http://ra-ajax.org/samples/Viewport-Calendar-Starter-Kit.aspx
But unfortunately it doesn’t matter even if I bend space and time since I’m on .Net/Mono which seems to be the “wrong political choice” for the CNNs of our sector… :(
.
@Dion (and crew)
You guys have helped me out earlier, and I am very thankful for that. And I am sorry for “blowing the whistle” like I do here.
Though when you have something which scientifically easily can be *proven* to be the *definitely-by-far* best Ajax library. At least on the .Net stack. Possibly also regardless of language too. And you get *one* article there must be something wrong…
.
I remember you did an article of ExtJS running on Wii…
Well Ra-Ajax runs on Wii, iPhone, WindowsMobile (Opera), Nokia (Opera), SonyEricson, Linux, FF, Chrome, Safari, IE, “whatever”. In addition Ra-Ajax is less then 20KB of JavaScript while ExtJS spends 1 minute just loading the screen every time I click a link. Ra is *L*GPL Ext is GPL and commercial. Plus the latest focal area of Ext LLC (ExtGWT) is basically xerox-copying my ideas of “no JavaScript Ajax” and still they’ve got like 100s of Articles and Ra-Ajax have like *ONE* that hurts – not to mention that it is probably not in the best interest of the world…
Especially considering that Ra-Ajax is FREE while ExtJS at least have been accused of (not by me though!) actually tricking the world with bait and switch which if is true even beats the FUD and EEE techniques of MSFT…
.
Now what is so wrong with .Net and Mono that makes it impossible to write about Ra-Ajax? Should .Net developers be forced into choosing Silverlight just because you guys don’t want to promote .Net libraries at all…?
.
If Ra sucked I wouldn’t mind staying in the “cold”, but it doesn’t! Ra rules BIG TIME!
I’ve sent in news which beats about 70% of every single news article you guys have had here. *Ever*…!
And I know, because I still follow you guys…
Still ZIP…!
Maybe you guys wouldn’t have dropped like 80% at Alexa.com if you didn’t stop writing about Ajax for .Net about a year ago…?
You guys are loosing it, and the reason is because you’re not embracing more than a fraction of the world…! Embrace *everything* (which is Open Web) and help get Open Web out there and see your Alexa ratings soar up again…
Fact is according to Alexa ra-ajax.org is soon to be bigger than you guys. That’s *weird*…!

@Thomas:
.
I’m not here to jump on you again or anything, but I see this site as being primarily focused on JavaScript news and the technologies that affect it (evidence given by the numbers on the top left of this page). You push your Framework with the primary focus on not using JavaScript at all. On that alone I think you stick out like a sore thumb to a number of people.
.
Also inflammatory claims of being the *best* ajax library is hardly a fact so much as an opinion. Your framework is Domain Specific to the .NET framework as you had said and that probably turns off a few others as well. Not all web developers work in Microsoft shops, nor use Visual Studio as their main IDE, I’ll venture a guess that not even a majority do (in which I may be wrong on this point but I’ve never seen anything close to reliable statistics).
.I’ve sent in news which beats about 70% of every single news article you guys have had here. *Ever*…!
.
If you posted more of that news on your website you may get more traffic. When I peruse your site (which I do once a week), there is nothing sticking out to me saying “Holy sh**, that’s so awesome, I’m going to sell my house and use Ra-Ajax!!!1!!!one!!!”.
.
Give a better presentation, allow people to offer feedback, and you wouldn’t have a need for Ajaxian and the people here wouldn’t need to derail post after post on the same old argument again and again.

@TNO
Brilliant words, need some time to digest them, but will re-read again in a day or two and “re-think”…
Thank you :)
.
Regarding your “number one” comment there are several metrics you can measure on, codesize, codecomplexity, cross browser workings, speed etc…
I’ve found Ra-Ajax to run in circles around everything else I’ve seen on every single metric I’ve heard of, but I agree “the best” is open to subjective opinions…

ThomasHansen: You should consider a different marketing strategy for your home cooked library. Your shameless plugs in pretty much every ajaxian post are gettting tiresome. If the library was any good it would’ve catched on by now, stop spamming the place.

@lovejs
“If the library was any good it would’ve catched on by now”
Remember BetaMax vs. VHS…? ;)
.
“stop spamming the place”
I am trying to keep my comments relevant, and I think I’m succeeding. Sure I mention Ra a lot, but when I mention it I mention it in a context where I think it makes sense…