Negotiators from 195 nations are haggling in Paris over a
planned universal accord to slash greenhouse-gas emissions that trap the Sun's
heat, warming Earth's surface and oceans and disrupting its delicate climate
system.”

"Britain and other rich countries face demands for
$3.5 trillion (£2.3 trillion) in payments to developing nations to secure a
deal in Paris to curb global warming. Developing countries have added a clause
to the latest draft of the text under which they would be paid the “full costs”
of meeting plans to cut emissions."http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/environment/article4637269.ece

"The night saw an ugly brawl as US Secretary Of State John Kerry threatened that developed countries would walk out of the agreement if they were asked to commit to differentiation or financial obligations. “You can take the US out of this. Take the developed world out of this. Remember, the Earth has a problem. What will you do with the problem on your own?” he told ministers from other countries during a closed-door negotiation on the second revised draft of the Paris agreement."

ISSUES THAT HAVE DELAYED AGREEMENT

Should developed countries have a legal obligation to pay for climate change

Should developing countries, that do not have historical responsibility for emissions, also contribute to the fund

Should burden-sharing be based on current economic capabilities or a combination of historical emissions and current economic capabilities

Should the actions of developing countries be linked to the provision of finance and technology or should they be treated at par with developed countries going forward

Should there be a periodic review of delivery of finance and technology by developed world or not

Should the long-term goal be to keep global temperature rise below 1.5 degree by the turn of the century or should it be somewhere between 1.5 degree and 2 degrees

Should poor and vulnerable countries continue to hold the right to file for damages against permanent loss caused to them because of climate change.

"Reacting to second version of the draft, Adriano
Campolina, ActionAid Chief Executive, said, "In the closing hours of the
Paris talks we have been presented with a draft deal that denies the world
justice.

"By including a clause for no future claim of
compensation and liability, the US has ensured people suffering from the
disastrous impacts of climate change will never be able to seek the justice
owed to them."http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/.../50136956.cms...

So here are some of the ironies and hypocrisy of climate alarmism movement.

Irony/hypocrisy 1: more alarmism, more extortion for
climate money, more anger and disappointent.

Irony/hypocrisy 2: more hatred of fossil fuel, more use
of fossil fuel with thousands of airplane flights to reach Paris from tens of
thousands of climate negotiators + hangers on.

Irony/hypocrisy 3: many planet saviours hate nuclear
power, then they go to France, enjoy uninterrupted electricity while France is
the #1 nuke-dependent country in the planet. In 2013, 76% of its total
electricity output came from nuke.

The planet is fine, it does not need self-proclaimed "planet saviours" and just undergoing the old and tested climate cycle of warming-cooling-warming-cooling, endlessly, with or without humans and their SUVs.

The planet's inhabitants though need to be spared and saved from those climate charlatans whose goal in spreading climate alarmism is more government, more global ecological and energy central planning. Alarmism now simply digs its own contradictions and problems.