A HOUSE DIVIDED: Why asking Congress to perfrom two often contradictory jobs--legislating
and overseeing--is asking for trouble.

David Segal

The Washington Monthly, Jan/Feb, 1994

CONGRESS AT WORK, A DOSE OF REALITY

THE
ONE THING YOU CAN BE SURE YOUR COBGRESSMAN STANDS FOR IS THAT OF GETTING ELECTED.--P.J. O'Rouke, from "The Parliment of Whores".

The account of how Congress through its appropriation power and use of committees runs our bureaucracy and guides
the production of contractors is revealed in the example of McDonnell Douglas C-17, the giant military cargo transport plane.
Over and over gain on programs such as "60 Minutes" we learn of Congress failures in the area of supervision. David Segals
article exposes its mechanism.

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF FAILURE

Conflict: 1. Each branch of the military
is seeking a bigger chunk of the federal budget. They thus exaggerate the need, effectiveness, and costs of weapon systems.
Since they don't control the purse strings

2. Like the military, contractor also exaggerate the costs and effectiveness
and delivery date of the system they are developing.

3. Congressmen have objectives which are inconsistent with their
role of regulating the working of government

OPERATIONS AND CONFLICTS: a. Many of those on the committee have
a vested interest in funding programs good for the industry they are regulating, because that industry is a major employer
in their district/state.

b. Those who lobby for an industry as well as individual corporations are permitted to make
substantial election contributions. Those who pay the piper select the tune.

c. Congressmen are more concerned with
getting into the press than performing their oversight duties.

d. Hearings resemble product commercials, rather than
investigation of expenditures.

e. Peer pressure to get along.

f. Back scratching; VIZ., I vote for your bill,
you vote for mine.

g. Industries are permitted to make donations to them for reelection, to given them plane tickets,
honoraria, and other gifts.

h. As long as a single committee is supposed to provide funding and oversight, then any
exposure of abuse smears themselves (who do the funding).

The political realities give Congress a different agenda.
There are 247 committees and 127,000 staff employees. Each Congressman sits on several committees. Most of the efforts of
this staff has little to do with exposing and correcting the problems connected to the function of the particular oversight
committee.

Given that over half of the work time a Congressman spends is in activites related to getting votes, there
is little time left for the several committes they belong to, other than attending their meatings and reading prepared statements
into the record (JK's addition).

Since the military does not control the purse strings, they tend to work with the
contractors in their deceptions rather than to expose them, for to expose them could result in the cutting of funding for
a weapons system.

Congress role should be to obtain the best possible armament for the percentage of the federal budget
so allocated, and in particular to serve the best interests of all the people within the traditionally established limits.

Things have changed since the World War Two. The press is much less interested in exposure of abuse in government--measured
by television news content. Exposing abuse is thus not nearly so effective in producing name recognition, as it was in Truman's
time. And being not so effective entails that as per reelction the rewards are much less.